The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 04/23/2019 Item # 9A 9 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA I "'! REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: (JI Normal Legal Advertisement ® Other: (Display Adv.,location,etc.) ********************************************************************************************************** Originating Dept/Div: Bayshore Gateway CRA Person: Debrah Forester Date: 03/7/19 Petition No. (If none,give brief description): Public Notice for Collier County Redevelopment Plan Amendment Petitioner: (Name&Address): Bayshore Community Redevelopment Agency 3570 Bayshore Dr unit 102 Naples,Fl 34112 Name&Address of any person(s)to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed,attach separate sheet) Hearing before: XX BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appearing at least 10 days before hearing.)Ad to run no later than March 11,2019 BCC Regular Meeting March 26, 2019 Newspaper(s)to be used: (Complete only if important): To appear in NDN X Naples Daily News ❑ Other ❑Legally Required Proposed Text:(Include legal description&common location& Size):Notice of Public Hearing-Collier County, Florida regarding Community Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Plan Update. Companion petition(s), if any&proposed hearing date:N/A Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? ® Yes ❑ No If Yes,what account should be charged for advertising costs: Please charge to PO 4500191796 Reviewed by: Debrah Forester 03/7/2019 Division Administrator or Designee Date List Attachments: (1)Notices of Public Hearing DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Administrator. Note: If legal document is involved,be sure that any necessary legal review,or request for same,is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Administrator. The Administrator's office will distribute copies: ❑ County Manager agenda file: to ®Requesting Division ® Original-Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office,retaining a copy for file. *********************************************************************************************************** FOR CLERK'S OFFICE US ONLY: Date Received: j 2 i-9 Date of Public hearing: �'up'"11 Date Advertisedt3''I(Q'-1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: NeetVirginia <Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 2:29 PM To: Minutes and Records Subject: FW: Legal Ad Public Notice March 11 Attachments: AD BCC Public Hearing NOTICE OF COLLIER COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CHANGE 2.docx; Legal Ad March 11 Request.docx From: ForesterDebrah Sent:Thursday, March 7, 2019 5:50 PM To: NeetVirginia <Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BelpedioJennifer<Jennifer.Belpedio@colliercountyfl.gov>; GarciaShirley<Shirley.Garcia@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Legal Ad Public Notice March 11 Hi Dinny, attached is a request for an legal ad we would like published on Monday, March 11, 2019. I know that is right around the corner. I did meet with Jennifer today and we discussed it. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks so much. Debrah Debrah Forester, AICP Collier County CRA Director 3570 Bayshore Drive, Unit 102, Naples, FL 34112 239-331-3266 239-285-8270 "HOW ARE WE DOING?" Please CLICK HER! to fill out a CUSTOMER SURVEY. We appreciate your feedback! Co er County .40", 07 IMMOKALEE IS:iy.M.rc iaecw.ay Triontk(RA•NayJi.s Hcauifie,cinn MSTL CRA Counl�+Corr Community Haid nijn c'rnA ti1S1'l Redeyefgpmerx Agency Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 9A NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT AND MODIFICATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Any person who decides to appeal any The Collier County Board of County decision made by the Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing during Commissioners with respect to any matter the Regular Meeting being held on Tuesday, considered at this hearing will need a record March 26, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of of the proceedings and may need to ensure County Commissioners Chamber, 3299 that a verbatim record is made, which record Tamiami Trail E., Naples, Florida 34112 for the includes the testimony and evidence upon purpose of considering and adopting an which the appeal is to be heard. Amendment to the Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan. Any person with a disability requiring auxiliary aids and services for this meeting may call the Generally, the scope of the Plan as amended Collier County Facilities Management Division, and modified, is an update to the vision, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail E., Suite 101, policies, and projects instituted by the Naples, Florida 34112, or (239) 252-8380 with Community Redevelopment Agency Board and requests at least two business days before the provide a time certain for completing all meeting date. redevelopment financed by tax increment revenue,. Board of County Commissioners will Collier County Community Redevelopment Areas consider adoption of a Resolution titled: Collier County Florida Immokaleo CRA A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COLLIER Community RaaavabpmentArea COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AS AMENDED AND MODIFIED, TO PROVIDE A TIME CERTAIN FOR COMPLETING ALL !ow_YAHO e — — REDEVELOPMENT FINANCED BY ?lil , INCREMENT REVENUE, THAT SUCH TIME 11M-7- CERTAIN CERTAIN SHALL OCCUR NO LATER THAN 30 YEARS AFTER THE FISCAL YEAR IN ! °'n''°"`"A; WHICH THE PLAN IS AMENDED AND S' ts MODIFIED PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, CHAPTER !� � P0141,1.';0 163, PART III, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND : �.., PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ° �'^ j;1'•' , • ' e a• A complete copy of the proposed Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Plan as amended and modified, and the proposed Resolution can be obtained from the Collier County Clerk of the Courts, 3299 Tamiami Trail I E, Ste 401, Naples, Florida, 34112 and the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA office, 3570 Bayshore Dr. Ste 102 Naples, Fl 34112. Ph. (239)643-1115 and the Immokalee CRA office, 750 South Fifth Street, Immokalee, FL 34142. Phone (239) 867-0026. All interested persons are invited to appear at the meeting and may be heard with respect to the Plan and Resolution. 9A 1. Attachment A AMENDMENT-MARCH 2019 • COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN • BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE IMMOKALEE Community Redevelopment Area a Community Redevelopment Are • • Collier County Community Redeveldfrnent Agency it4,... .-,,1,., .. -..:-., Gzu oro • IMMOKALEE CRA . . Daysfio Gateway Triangle CRA.Bayslwre Beiruti(icatiori MSTU — Haldeman Creek MSTU . i The Place to Call Home! 1.�41:11111 Sk.,MT r.:J -..-,» �iJ ! rj;R "'-'71— ( °IMMOKAL ECRA BOUNDARY Sw m_n 4T'r ! d:i i + IrIM1fM E F10RIDA pi ..'ri.1,--fX\7- 3L s.4iI- • 7- , I r F7,1:7, 1 , , 1 , r,I I:1 r 1 I J i I a I i . .iF' L t• l , i 1: i 1 _ 111 i' ; - J ,, ■- r 't 4. I . r , I r 1 r.1 ■, I . , „ 1 . . ,� _ I !I �, list ! • i C ii ; 1_ I I e pwil ��•'•,� t +N�[..) a ai n x r r r rl11r ala e.) ■ Ir ■ ■y // I; a : :i a x • r a- a ! a n x ; a l ■ a ■ ■ 1 x ?? 1 it I i i 1 �. 1 { a •■. 7; 7 a a t�i : ._T__ !—_i_ , } • r1 y7*iii 1r 1 :w ('_, m ■ Ali - lq' r +,, 1 I il H -Ifs'J 1 -4 24 { S S + �,; r 1 n 11 r I ► t' ■ - 11 , h a r y 1 - �,lir " 41 ,V...,,....,,4:........4.•yw r " 11-f- . 1 • !a-._ r•a . f. c J S i{3 M x x N ■ a a a Y Th!^i5 -,':'.1":1'!.,-..:1—...1;, 1'1 ti a 3 �1 s i �x , D I 1 : n 1 n 1 '1.;)--•',,,';',••••S 6rs l v� �,,.r,, 'i':?,1t r • tY�r a, 3=:. O 31yl- IIIOAAEEE,F1OA1- 's a - x n a r , 1 a a• ,Iiii l x I r l x , a F to r ,_-.:•1-t1-...-...‘:,y .7 . [ w.. r1's - x 1 ;TV EZEWV 1 ■ a ! x 1 ■ a a I a , a x i ■ a • • Adopted June 13,2000. • First Amendments March 20.19' . . 9A RESOLUTION NO. 2019- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AS AMENDED AND MODIFIED, TO PROVIDE A TIME CERTAIN FOR COMPLETING ALL REDEVELOPMENT FINANCED BY INCREMENT REVENUE, THAT SUCH TIME CERTAIN SHALL OCCUR NO LATER THAN 30 YEARS AFTER THE FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THE PLAN IS AMENDED AND MODIFIED PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, CHAPTER 163, PART III, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida enacted the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969,which is presently codified in Part III of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (the"Act"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, a redevelopment plan must be adopted by the governing body to initiate redevelopment activities within the redevelopment area; and • WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2000-82 declared the need for a Community Redevelopment Agency and authorized the preparation of a Redevelopment Plan for the Bayshore Gateway study area; and WHEREAS,the Board,by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-83 established the Board of County Commissioners as the Community Redevelopment Agency to carry out redevelopment activities; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-181 adopted the Community Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS,the Board of County Commissioners has not approved an overall update to amend the Community Redevelopment Plan since the adoption of Resolution No.2000-181; and WHEREAS,the Collier County Planning Commission("Local Planning Agency") conducted a formal review at a public hearing on March 21, 2019 and submitted its recommendations to the Community Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, the recommendations from the Local Planning Agency were considered by the Community Redevelopment Agency at a meeting on March 26, 2019 and reviewed for inclusion into the CRA plan, as appropriate; and 1 C.){ 9A WHEREAS,the Community Redevelopment Agency on March 26, 2019 voted to recommend approval of the amended CRA Plan and transmitted it to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, IN REGULAR SESSION DULY ASSEMBLED ON THIS 26th DAY OF MARCH 2019 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: I. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan (Attachment "A") meets the requirements of Section 163.360, Florida Statutes. II. Finds, determines and declares that the notice requirements of Section 163.346 and 163.361(3), Florida Statutes and the public hearing requirements of Section 163.361(2), Florida Statutes, have been met. III. Finds, determines, and declares that the Plan Amendment conforms to the Collier County Growth Management Plan. IV. That the Plan Amendment to Collier County Community Redevelopment Area Plan is hereby approved and directs the CRA to proceed with implementation of the Plan Amendment. IL This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2019, after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA By: By: , DEPUTY CLERK WILLIAM L. McDANIEL Jr, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legality: Jennifer A. Belpcdio Assistant County Attorney \�\ 2 `�.J 9A Attachment A AMENDMENT-MARCH 2019 COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE IMMOKALEE Community Redevelopment Area Community Redevelopment Area el.eatz4/4;4 14-1., 310190-14. Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency IM OKALEECRA Bayshorc Gateway Triangle CRA.Bayshore Beautification MSTU Haldeman Creek MSTU i The Place to Call Home! i t 1 . 4,i u.p,-�r - IMMOKALEECRA BOUNDARY iAl A ; ' e Mt . "WALKKOWA , I # iia JI rrl I- j1te w . a !ti l.17..r 1. _. n :. A , x- r, , z u a ...„ ! .: t._, . ZA1MElF 1v1.1: .. y.... S '� tl I s., • ' , Ill Pi !, II1 ,',...±:--7. , 1 t •I a •, n i *., "P ',""-In..;41 1 'I 1�1k.} .,%.! 'f .. F 6 , q n F x Ax Y .. , AI: x i `4 F M.. W�, -\,uV YeR.O I iyy( _ I ,.a rY ,___,,r..,„.„,:„..,. ,...,„,_-,-1, IL rYa bilk. "..(.1';�,• \J d90NA1tE.flO , Tt Al d. 1 4 ',i� 9&w �. .1 4 : . 3 , . ,. r: r a 4.____ 1 f � i r 7 W f .. Y / Ei1rnN4�N\9K+stAL ties. 4 i -frr yt_... � J I N I � x.r..L■ �1._� Y n tl :1 n I Adopted June 13, 2000 First Amendment: March 2019 - • A Collier County Redevelopment Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION 1 PLAN OVERVIEW SECTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION 1.2 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT 3 SECTION 1.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 SECTION 1.4 CONFORMANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS 5 SECTION 1.5 THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7 SECTION 1.6 DURATION, MODIFICATION AND SEVERABILITY OF PLAN 9 SECTION 2 FINANCIAL PLAN SECTION 2.1 FUNDING SOURCES 10 SECTION 2.2 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES 11 SECTION 3 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT ELEMENT 12 SECTION 4 IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN SECTION 4.1 INTRODUCTION 13 SECTION 4.2 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT 15 SECTION 4.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 19 SECTION 4.4 COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES 26 SECTION 4.5 REDEVELOPMENT AREA CHARACTERISTICS AND ANALYSIS 28 SECTION 4.6 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS ASSESSMENT 31 SECTION 4.7 REDEVELOPMENT GOALS 35 SECTION 4.8 PHASE I -REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 35 SECTION 4.9 FUTURE PHASES 39 SECTION 4.10 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT STATEMENT 41 SECTION 4.10 PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURES 42 SECTION 4.11 VALUATION 47 SECTION 5 BAYSHORE/GATEWAY REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5-E-1 5.01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5-E-1 5.02 GOALS 5-E-1 5.03 CONCEPTUAL PLAN DIAGRAM 5-E-4 5.04 CHARACTER AREAS 5-E-7 5.05 FOCUS OF REDEVELOPMENT 5-E-9 5.06 FUNDING, PROJECTS& INITIATIVES 5-E-10 5.07 2000&2019 PLAN COMPARISON 5-E-14 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5-1-1 5.1.1 VISION 5-1-1 5.1.2 PROCESS 5-1-1 5.1.3 PLAN ORGANIZATION 5-1-1 5.2 BACKGROUND 5-2-1 5.2.1 CREATION OFA CRA AREA 5-2-1 9A 5.2.2 2000 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS AND PROJECTS 5-2-1 5.2.3 BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE CRA 2018 PERSPECTIVE 5-2-9 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK&ELEMENTS 5-3-1 5.3.1 CONCEPTUAL PLAN DIAGRAM 5-3-2 5.3.2 LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN 5-3-7 5.3.3 PUBLIC SPACE, PARKS, &OPEN SPACE 5-3-26 5.3.4 DEVELOPMENT 5-3-31 5.3.5 TRANSPORTATION, CONNECTIVITY, &WALKABILITY 5-3-42 5.3.6 INFRASTRUCTURE 5-3-59 5.3.7 PROCESS 5-3-66 5.3.8 CHARACTER AREAS 5-3-67 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5-4-1 PRIORITIZATION OF PROJECTS& INITIATIVES 5.4.1 5-4-1 FINANCING PLANNING 5.4.2 5-4-1 PROJECTS & INITIATIVES PRIORITIZATION 5.4.4 COORDINATION & PARTNERSHIPS 5-4-17 5.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5-5-1 5.5.1 OVERVIEW OF RELEVANT STATUTES 5-5-1 5.5.2 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5-5-1 5.5.3 ACQUISITION, DEMOLITION/CLEARANCE, & IMPROVEMENT 5-5-1 5.5.4 ZONING& COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGES 5-5-1 5.5.5 LAND USE, DENSITIES & BUILDING REQUIREMENTS 5-5-1 5.5.6 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT 5-5-5 _ 5.5.7 SAFEGUARDS, CONTROLS, RESTRICTIONS &ASSURANCES 5-5-5 5.6 TAX INCREMENT&MSTU ESTIMATES TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 5-6-1 5.6.1 5-6-1 MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNITS(MSTUS) 5.6.2 5-6-2 5.6.3 UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS 5-6-12 SECTION 6 RELOCATION PROCEDURES 102 FIGURES FIGURES 1 COLLIER COUNTY MAP-2004 2 FIGURES 2 IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARIES-2004 14 FIGURES 3 IMMOKALEE FUTURE LAND USE MAP 24 FIGURES 4 IMMOKALEE SUBAREAS 36 APPENDIX Appendix A Resolutions and Trust Fund Ordinance 9A _ I. 2000-82-ESTABLISHMENT OF CRA AREA AND FINDING OF NECESSITY AND BLIGHTED CONDITIONS REPORT II. 2000-83-ESTABLISHING THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY III. 2000-181-ADOPTION OF 2000 CRA PLAN IV. 2004-179- EXPANDING IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARY V. 2004-384-EXPANDING IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARY APPENDIX B IMMOKALEE EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP APPENDIX C BAYSHORE/GATEWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS MAPS-2000 APPENDIX D GATEWAY TRIANGLE STORMWATER MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM-2000 APPENDIX E BAYSHORE/GATEWAY ESTIMATED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT VALUE-2000 APPENDIX F 2012-2025 FUTURE LAND USE MAP 9A Section 1 PLAN OVERVIEW Section 1.1 Introduction The Collier County Redevelopment Plan (CRA Plan) is a guide for the physical and economic revitalization and enhancement of the designated redevelopment areas. This plan, with its specific components, has been formulated in close cooperation with the members of each community and is based on the objectives identified by community members in a series of public workshops. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency consists of two areas designated by the Collier County Board of County commissioners as redevelopment areas under the authority of Florida Statutes, Chapter 163, Part III, Community Redevelopment Act. The two areas depicted on Figure 1 as amended, were identified by the presence of one or more conditions of blight as defined in the statutes. These findings are contained in Section 1.2 and further specified in the Appendix A and component section for each area. The redevelopment program in Collier County provides the authority granted by the statutes, the means to achieve growth management objectives, by redirecting growth to areas where urban services currently are provided or are needed but currently inadequate, encourages revitalization of once viable neighborhoods and business districts and encourages the provision of affordable, good quality housing within centers of urban concentration. The Collier County Growth Management Plan policies provide the rationale for the establishment of redevelopment areas in the county and recognizes the redevelopment plan adopted for each component area. In addition, each community has formulated their own specific objectives. Each component section describes the history and process of community involvement in each respective community. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency approved an expansion to the lmmokalee Community Redevelopment Area boundary in 2004 (Resolution 2004-179 and Resolution 2004-384). In 2018, the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency approved a contract with Tindale Oliver Design to gathered data, perform technological analysis and seek public and agency input in order to draft an amendment to this redevelopment plan that would lay out a framework of goals, objectives, and strategies to continue the redevelopment efforts in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area. In 1969, the Florida State Legislature established Chapter 163, Part III, enabling local units of government to declare a need for a Community Redevelopment Agency and outlines the powers available to carryout community redevelopment and related activities. The overall goal of the legislature was to encourage local initiative in downtown and neighborhood revitalization. The Florida Legislature has made amendments to the enabling legislation over the years. This Plan recognizes those amendments. Figure 1 — Updated Map 1 L. T w Q W N rieW p LL J Cr .) • W 0 0 11 6Z NS \ i r".-• N N ezHSKik.�'� y K 4# J h O il'R~ JOAla OlOS36S6Al8OlOS36 �_ �" 1� t-1.44;--. L' dr, I N 0A18 S38ASA18S0V133A 3 RS to f 03,v4v 44. ,Y ILI JI \ i•1 ,P iht remote, 0A19 23311109' C tr' N 0k18 NV901 mco CD o i O •a i ON NOISONIAl1 tr ^�` � C3 a d L N 023:JN`llt3d 1`30d23R/ „!. 2.0ft /Ars I }o 3 r mw0 O MEy04 . _ .Z el V GVtiF OF _ CJ Lu a E E a7- w w 0 a0LL 2 9A Section 1.2 Findings and Conditions of Blight In 1969, the Florida State Legislature established Statue 163.00 enabling local units of government to set up Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRA). To assist in redevelopment efforts, these local agencies were mandated to establish Redevelopment Trust Funds, which would serve as the depository for tax increment revenues. The overall goal of the legislature was to encourage local initiative in downtown and neighborhood revitalization. In 1984, the Florida Legislature amended Section 163.335 to include five primary objectives: 1. To address the physical, social, and economic problems associated with slum and blighted areas (F.S. 163.335 (1)); 2. To encourage local units of government to improve the physical environment (i.e. buildings, streets, utilities, parks, etc.) by means of rehabilitation, conservation or clearance /redevelopment(F.S. 163.335(2)); 3. To convey to local community redevelopment agencies the powers of eminent domain, expenditure of public funds, and all other general police powers as a means by which slum and blighted areas can be improved (F.S. 163.335 (3)); 4. To enhance the tax base in the redevelopment area by encouraging private reinvestment in the area and by channeling tax increment revenues into public improvements within the area (F.S. 163.335 (4)); 5. To eliminate substandard housing conditions and to provide adequate amounts of housing in good condition to residents of low or moderate income, particularly to the elderly (F.S. 163.335(5)). To be designated as a redevelopment area, the area must meet the criteria outlined in Chapter 163.340 of the Florida Statute. The area in Collier county were designated as Blighted"which is defined as the following: "Blighted Area" means either: (a) An area in which there a substantial number of slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions; 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land; and 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities; or roadways, bridges, or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. 3 A On March 14, 2000, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners made finding of conditions of blight and adopted Resolution 2000-82 and adopted Resolution 2000-83 establishing the Community Redevelopment Agency. Both of these resolutions are contained in Appendix A. Section 1.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Collier County Growth Management Plan provides land use designations, which describe the intent and allowable density and intensity of appropriate uses for future development. The Growth Management Plan was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in 1989 and has been amended several times since the original adoption. This section identifies the goals, objectives and policies that apply to both redevelopment areas. The goals, objectives and policies that apply to each area specifically are included in Section 4 — Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan and Section 5— Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan. This amendment recognizes that the Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan will be amended following the adoption of the updated Immokalee Area Master Plan currently going through the public hearing process. Both the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area and the Immokalee Redevelopment Area are located in the Urban Designation as identified on the Collier County Future Land Use Map Appendix F. As stated in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan: Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general portions of Collier County: areas with the greatest residential densities, and areas in close proximity, which have or are projected to receive future urban support facilities and �-- services. It is intended that Urban Designated Areas accommodate the majority of population growth and that new intensive land uses be located within them. Accordingly, the Urban Area will accommodate residential uses and a variety of non- residential uses. The Urban Designated Area, which includes Immokalee, Copeland, Plantation Island, Chokoloskee, Port of the Islands, and Goodland, in addition to the greater Naples area, represents less than 10% of Collier County's land area. The redevelopment plan allows for detailed planning that will encourage the coordination of activities as outlined in Objective 4 of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 4: Continually refine the Future Land Use Element through detailed planning in order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development, housing and urban design. Policy 4.8 recognizes the adoption of the redevelopment plans for each component area: Policy 4.8: The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for existing commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses, modifications to development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage redevelopment. Such redevelopment plans may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Board on June 13, 2000; it encompasses the Bayshore Drive corridor and the triangle area formed by US41 East, Davis Boulevard an Airport-Pulling Road. The Immokalee Redevelopment Plan was adopted ti 4 9A by the Board on June 13, 2000. Other specific areas that may be considered by the Board of County Commissioners for redevelopment include, but are not necessarily limited to: a. Pine Ridge, between US41 North and Goodlette-Frank Road; b. US 41 North in Naples Park; and c. Bonita Beach Road between Vanderbilt Drive and the west end of Little Hickory Shores #1 Subdivision. The Immokalee Community is governed by the entire Growth Management Plan which includes the Immokalee Area Master Plan (reference FLUE Policy 4.3), a separate element of the Growth Management Plan adopted in 1991 and significantly revised in 1997 and 2007. The Master Plan contains land use designations and policies applicable to the Immokalee area. Significant amendments to the Immokalee Area Master Plan are under review. A review of the land use designation and policies that apply for each area is contained in the individual component section of this document: Section 4— Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan and Section 5— Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan. Section 1.4 CONFORMANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS Chapter 163, Part III of the Florida Statutes authorizes the creation of Community Redevelopment Agencies and the development of Community Redevelopment Plans. The legislation focuses primarily on the creation of Community Redevelopment Agencies, the powers granted to them and specific criteria of the development of Community Redevelopment Plans. As part of a Community Redevelopment Agency's formation, a Community Redevelopment Plan is created which provides the framework for effective redevelopment of the Community Redevelopment Area. The Community Redevelopment Plan is a comprehensive document that provides the details for redevelopment of the area, including an extensive analysis required by Florida Statutes. In accordance with Florida Statues, the governing body, in this case the Board of County Commissioners, may make subsequent changes, amendments or updates to the Community Redevelopment Plan upon recommendations of the Community Redevelopment Agency. Modifications to the plan require a public hearing process and appropriate public notification. The Community Redevelopment Act requires redevelopment plans to be consistent with the comprehensive growth management plan. This plan is as a whole consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. This plan establishes a vision for the community as a whole, the component areas and its neighborhoods. The CRA's vision will not be achieved overnight or even in the next five years. This plan is intended to provide a framework for policy decisions and public improvements over the next thirty years. For the purposes of this plan, "encourage" means to support, recommend, endorse or seek approval of any project, action, program or activity and can also mean to provide incentives and allocate funds, assets and resources, including participation by staff, employees, contractors, consultants or others if approved by the Collier County Agency (CRA) and allocated through the standard operating and procurement guidelines adopted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners. 5 9A `,,, This plan contains provisions that contemplate actions to be taken by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), including various agencies, departments or boards of the County. While the BCC has adopted this Plan, any recommendations requiring further BCC action will be taken separately to the BCC to approve and authorize implementation of any such actions. The Private Sector The Redevelopment Plan cannot be implemented without the predominant participation of the private sector. The role of the private sector is to evaluate the effectiveness of an investment risk in the Redevelopment Area and to pursue development opportunity consistent with the Redevelopment Plan. 6 9A Section 1.5 The Community Redevelopment Agency The management structure established to undertake formal redevelopment activities within the Redevelopment Area is the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Act, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners declared itself the CRA. The CRA is a legal entity, separate and distinct from the Board of County Commissioners. The Community Redevelopment Agency will use any and all methods of implementing the plan as authorized by law. The CRA will exercise the powers conferred by statute to take action within the Redevelopment Area such as will result in economic revitalization consistent with the Plan. The Board of County Commissioners has the following powers: • The power to determine an area to be slum or blighted or a combination thereof; to designate such area as appropriate for a community redevelopment project; and to hold any public hearings required with respect thereto. • The power to grant final approval to Community Redevelopment Plans and modifications thereof. • The power to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds as set forth in Section 163.385, Florida Statutes. • The power to approve the acquisition, demolition, removal or disposal of property and the power to assume the responsibility to bear loss as provided in Section 163.370, Florida Statutes. Community Redevelopment Agency Authority This Plan will be undertaken in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969. The County and the CRA may use any and all methods of achieving revitalization of the Redevelopment Area as authorized by law. The following sections generally describe the available development actions. Property Acquisition The Act authorizes the County and the Redevelopment Agency to acquire real property in the redevelopment area by purchase, condemnation, gift, exchange or other lawful means in accordance with this Plan. The County and CRA may acquire real property within the redevelopment area as may be necessary for public improvements. These acquisitions will provide sites for public facilities, eliminate unsafe conditions, removing non-conforming uses, or overcome diversity of ownership and faulty lot layout which prevent redevelopment and contribute to the perpetuation of blight in the area. Whenever possible, the designated property will be acquired through negotiation with current owners. The property will be acquired through standard Community Redevelopment Agency procedures. In those instances where negotiation does not result in a mutually satisfactory agreement, the properties may be acquired by eminent domain proceedings and just compensation awarded in accordance with Chapter 170, Florida Statutes. Areas for potential land acquisition and relocation (if necessary) are indicated in the component sections of this plan. When necessary, as plans are further specified in Phase I (2001-2005) particular parcels will be identified for acquisition where applicable. Such plans will be subject to approval by the CRA Board. The following provides the policies which would govern acquisition, disposition, or relocation activities. 7 9A Land Acquisition Plan and Program A land acquisition program will be designed to meet the goals and objectives of the redevelopment plan, while minimizing disruption of the neighborhood fabric to be retained and reinforced and minimizing acquisition costs. A land acquisition program could consist of the following components: • Right of Way Acquisition • Commercial Project Acquisitions • Residential Acquisitions for Major Projects • Residential Acquisitions for Infill Demolition, Site Preparation and Public Improvement The County and the CRA may each demolish, clear or move buildings, structures and other improvements from real property in the redevelopment area which it has acquired and as may be necessary to carry out the purpose of this plan. In addition, the County and /or the CRA may construct or cause to be constructed streets, sidewalks, curbs, utilities, lighting, open space, plazas, landscaping, water elements, and other amenities deemed necessary to implement this plan. The County and CRA may change portions of the redevelopment area to be devoted to public uses, public improvements, and infrastructure. Disposition Policy The CRA is authorized under the Act to sell, lease, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any interest in real property. To the extent permitted by law, the CRA is authorized to dispose of Real Property by negotiated sale or lease. All real property acquired by the CRA in the redevelopment area shall be sold or leased for development for the fair value to further the purpose of this plan and as determined pursuant to 163.380 (2), Florida Statute ( 2018). The CRA may reserve such powers and controls through disposition and development document with the purchasers or lessees of real property from the CRA as may be necessary to ensure that development begins within a reasonable period of time and that such development is carried out pursuant to the purpose of this plan. Interested developers will submit proposals in accordance with Section 163.380, Florida Statues. Selected developers will be required to execute binding disposition agreements with the CRA which will safeguard that the provisions of this plan be implemented. The property may be transferred for fair value subject to the disposition agreement and other conditions or covenants necessary to ensure that the purpose of redevelopment will be effectuated. The disposition of all publicly owned or assembled land will be subject to objective and clearly defined standards and procedures which will assure timely re-uses and improvements to property in accordance with the plan and its development controls. Guidelines may include but are not limited the following activities: • Site Re-Use Guidelines • Preferred Redeveloper Designation • Competitive Private Developer Selection • Terms of Property Conveyance 8 9A • Development Controls and Design Review • Residential Relocation • Commercial Relocation The CRA's Relocation Procedures are described in Section 6 of this Plan. Section 1.6 Duration, Modification and Severability of the Plan The 2000 plan was approved with a 30-year time frame. The 2019 amendment will extend the term of this plan to 2049 as allowed by Section 163.387(2)(a), Florida Statutes. From time to time during the term of this plan, the CRA may amend or modify this Plan. The provisions of this Plan are severable, and it is the intention of the County and the CRA to confer the whole or any part of the powers, goals, objectives and actions herein provided for and if any of the provisions of this Plan or any action implementing any provisions of this Plan shall be held unconstitutional, invalid or void by any court of competent jurisdiction, the decisions of said court shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions of this Plan. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the County and the CRA that this Plan would have been adopted and implemented had such unconstitutional, invalid or void provision or action not been included herein. 9 9A Section 2 FINANCIAL PLAN A viable financing program for redevelopment requires a strong commitment from the public and private sector. The key to implementation the public actions called for in this plan is attracting private market investment and the additional ad valorem tax revenue it produces. To carry out redevelopment, the CRA will use all available sources of funding from local, state and federal government and the private sector. It should be noted that the following Financial Plan is intended as a guide for funding redevelopment activities in the Redevelopment Area. Flexibility is essential. The timing, cost and tax revenue impact of private investment is, at best, a projection based upon existing knowledge. Interest rates, construction costs, and national economic conditions will vary and cause revisions in investment decisions. Section 2.1 Funding Sources Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area will require a substantial financial investment on the part of the Community Redevelopment Agency. As provided for under the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, the principal source of funding for the Redevelopment Agency will be through the mechanism of Tax Increment Financing. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) realizes the incremental increase in property tax revenues resulting from redevelopment and uses it to pay for public improvements needed to support and encourage new development. TIF is designed to allow local government to finance, over a term of years, front-end costs involved in the redevelopment of blighted areas. By using this tool a local government can develop and adopt a redevelopment plan, repave or reroute streets, provide other public improvements and open space, provide housing, provide redevelopment assistance or incentives and acquire property within the redevelopment area for redevelopment. Eligible activities, under current law, include but are not limited to, the acquisition of land and improvements, relocation of displaced residents, demolition of deteriorated structures, site preparation, infrastructure improvements plus housing and commercial development and other activities implementing this plan. Use of Tax Increment Revenues Under Florida legislation, increment revenues can be used for the following purposes when directly related to redevelopment: $ Administrative and overhead expenses incidental to a redevelopment plan. $ Redevelopment planning and analysis. $ Acquisition of real property in the redevelopment area. $ Clearance and preparation of redevelopment sites, and relocation costs. $ Repayment of indebtedness and payment of expenses incidental to indebtedness. $ Development of affordable housing within the redevelopment area. $ Development of community policing innovations. $ Construction streets, utilities, parks, public areas, parking garages, and other improvements necessary to carrying out the redevelopment plan. 10 9A The greatest single source of funding for the Community Redevelopment Agency will come from tax increment revenues determined by growth in certain real property tax revenues within the Redevelopment Area. For the purpose of calculating the amount of tax increment revenues the frozen tax base is the final 1999 tax roll. Projected tax increment revenues for each component area is included in the Component sections of this Plan. Section 2.2 Other Funding Sources To make the most effective use of Tax Increment Revenues, the CRA and the County will use other County, State and Federal funding sources as appropriate and available to carry out the provisions of this plan. The Financial Plan assume that funds for the public expenditures identified in the Redevelopment Plan will be obtained from several sources in addition to Tax Increment Financing. Advances and Loans The Community Redevelopment Agency shall have the power to borrow money and accept advances from any source, public or private, including the County for any lawful purpose in connection with the redevelopment program. Tax Increment Revenues or any other funds deposited into the Redevelopment Trust Fund, which are not otherwise obligated shall be available for repayment of such loans or advances. Tax Increment Revenue Bonds When authorized by the Board of County Commissioners, the CRA may issue redevelopment revenue bonds, notes or other obligations to finance the undertaking of any community redevelopment project activity, including the payment of principal and interest upon any loans and retirement of bonds or other obligations previously issued. The security for such bonds may be based upon the anticipated tax increment revenues and such other revenues as may be legally available. Grants The Community Redevelopment Agency may apply for local, state or federal grants that may be applicable to implementation of the redevelopment goals outlined in this Plan. Tax Increment revenues may be used to match grant dollars if necessary. 11 9A Section 3 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT ELEMENT Since the redevelopment area contains low- and moderate-income housing, Section 163.362(3) Florida Statutes requires that the redevelopment plan contain a neighborhood impact element which... describe in detail the impact of the redevelopment upon the residents of the redevelopment area and the surrounding area in terms of relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilities and services, effect on school population, and other matters affecting the physical and social quality of the neighborhood. The structure of the Redevelopment Plan was specifically organized to minimize housing and residential neighborhood impacts while emphasizing neighborhood enhancement, particularly in those areas containing affordable housing stock. The intensive redevelopment activities recommended in the plan concentrate on existing commercial and semi-industrial areas. Each component section contains a Neighborhood Impact Element. 12 9A Section 4 COMPONENT SECTION-IMMOICALEE REDEVLOPMENT AREA PLAN . i • °YyZr f a ? �.: t y • - 1 yx. COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY • • • • Section 4.1 Introduction The Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan has been formulated in close cooperation with the people of V Immokalee.and is based on the objectives identified by community members in a series of public workshops. This area plan is a guide for the physical and economic revitalization and enhancement of the Immokalee Community. This area plan capitalizes on the existing Main Street project, the federal Enterprise Community designation,the Regional Airport Industrial Park and Lake Trafford to create a • catalyst for revitalizing the community and improving the housing stock. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed boundaries for the redevelopment area. Immokalee has long been considered isolated from the coastal county both in location and demographics. Immokalee's development is based on its agriculture resources,which resulted in Immokalee becoming the leading producer of winter vegetables in the United States. However, as the economics of agriculture changed the social problems associated with low wages, an unskilled labor force, and a transient multi-cultural population grew. One of the results has been a lack of reinvestment into the area. The economy of rural Southwest Florida has been and continues to be based primarily on agriculture, which has not kept pace with job growth throughout the state of Florida. Rural Florida continues to have lower earned income, higher unemployment,lower property values and fewer opportunities for employment. Regionally, the major economic contributors are retirement, tourism, construction, agriculture and the environment. Although tourism has a major impact on the regional urban economy, the Immokalee Community has yet to reap the benefits. The Immokalee Community was designated as a Federal Champion Community in 1994, a Florida Main Street area in 1996, and a Federal Enterprise Community in 1999. During the application process for the • Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community grant a series of community meetings were held with several hundred community residents attending. Based on the community input and the consensus reached at • these meetings a Strategic Plan was written. The Plan identifies four areas of concern: • 1. Accessibility and Appropriateness of Education and Training 2. Diversification of the economic base and availability of higher wage jobs 3. The availability of decent and affordable housing 4. Community Image and pride The Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan incorporates the goals and strategies identified in the Enterprise Strategic Plan as the basis for the redevelopment plan. • • • • • • . . 13 • 9A li f- rN ll -. N N M r r r A X A i U n 1� N r ,- N tO ill N M N r A N • ei. H M Or ,_ N N M O � N� ' 1t1 Z _e 1,� N 7 — I 11 o�pD pp a a N A ems- N h p ~ O co m n m o, M n l " 3' ^- M co r ' N N r ,1..� N N M r,. ,. a� '1, __ {r�fy�-gyp 'W r M 10 co N V N N i N f `� N N co iii +I._. - —7--- Q MO I G , N N �` _ �' _ ,. N N M ZQi _,P 1 _. Q y� Blesis=st sp` r Co AO',•• 7 1 r N N r!03a O' N N tD cNi `. W Nezas 13HtN — — —__i___ ii. pp WW N 00 r �•` N I V W 1i'r--A - , i 0 W - -. g Z. - , •:-.1' $ r . ov _ , ,, 0._..., _ eN- r 'x eSH ` — r r N M O r �" N N C -. -- _ _ ____—O--- - 1- ('1 t 2 r pW — n N ' r r N NM ,- i .-- —_-_____ _______ — M rOa X .'N / a . N N // Iti— 1 Q Ol m N N M V a, N M Q _ eci r. N .. .__\'474 giN M N e0 O E O — U../ to r- -• . n — LU ail co W .. _ --- — - tom_-�_.__�-. �, / l r hor z g . if. g 11 ' i , 1,„...., 1 E v, ,--14N I- E — a o a F4: •* .-v —T— N I�t r—N—_'1—_M- 14 • as •Section 4.2 ' FINDINGS.AND CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT Blighted Area las defined in Section 163.340(8), Florida Statutes] means either: • (a) An area in which there are a substantial number of slum, deteriorated or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety,-morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; The lmmokalee Redevelopment Area is characterized by a defective or inadequate street layout. Most lmmokalee residents walk or bicycle to work, school and shopping. Few adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities are available throughout the lmmokalee study area. Problems Include: Inadequate street layout and design Lack of shoulders and guardrails along streets adjacent to deep and wide drainage swales Poor access to Commercial and Industrial parking and access problems - Few sidewalks available for a predominately pedestrian population A general lack of neighborhood connections to each other The major arterial roadways are State Road 29, lmmokalee Road and New Market Road (SR 29A). State Road 29 is a two-lane facility that widens to four lanes through the small downtown area. The four-lane segment is called Main Street and is the focus of redevelopment and economic revitalization. It is the only segment with on-street parking and sidewalks on both sides. The two-lane segments of State Road 29 north and east of Main Street are two lanes with no sidewalks. • New Market Road Is a two-lane facility with 100 feet of right-of-way and no sidewalks, paved shoulders, or turn lanes. -The remaining right-of-way and truck parking is limestone. Vegetable and fruit packing houses and the State Farmers Market are located along this street. Trucks are encouraged to use this street as a bypass road to avoid thedowntown area and to pick up goods for transport. The roadway is in poor condition and maintenance costs are high due to damage by trucks dragging limestone on roadway. Although many people walk or bicycle to work in this area, pathway facilities are unavailable. • lmmokalee Road intersects with SR 29 at the beginning of Main Street. North of Main Street it narrows to two lanes and has a sidewalk on the west side only. Major problems exist along many of the local roads. There are few sidewalks. Typical local street • widths are less than twenty feet required in the Collier County Land Development Code and open stormwater systems are adjacent to roadways without paved shoulders or guardrails. For example, south of State Road 29, along 9`h Street, there are deep, wide drainage ditches on both sides of the • roadway. There are no sidewalks and. no guardrails to safeguard pedestrians and motorists. The roadway width is eighteen feet and there are not enough rights of way to construct pathway facilities without converting the open swales to a covered stormwater system. • 15 • . i lri addition, many residential neighborhoods are not linked to one another and most of the commercial areas are not linked to one another. The immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park lack adequate water and sewer service and stormwater management facilities to sufficiently handle the projected future development. County Road 846 that leads to Airpark Blvd. is a two-lane facility with narrow lanes and no paved shoulders. This facility does not adequately address the projected increase in truck traffic due to the future development of the airport and industrial park. • • 2'. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness: The majority of commercial lots are zoned General Commercial District(C-4) or Heavy Commercial District(C-5). In the C-4 and C-5 zoning district a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet, with a width of 100 feet for commercial development is required. Many of the commercial lots in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for commercial development. Some do not meet either of the lot width or lot square footage requirements. Existing buildings are frequently non- conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, setbacks, and buffers. The RMF6 zoning district has a minimum requirement of 6500 square feet with a width of 60 feetfor a single family development; 12,000 square feet with a width of 80 feet for a two-family development; and 5,500 square feet per unit with a width of 100 feet for a three or more family residential development. The majority of lots are non-conforming and rebuilding on these lots may require the owner to seek a variance from the development standards. In the South Immokalee area over 50% of the platted lots are non-conforming. The majority of these lots are zoned C-4 or RMF-6. A majority of the mobile home parks in the Immokalee community were developed in the 1970's and do not meet the minimum standards and permitted densities.The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a width of 60 feet for residential.development in the VR and MH zoning districts. It is common in the immokalee Community to have intensive commercial uses located adjacent to residential uses without adequate buffering between the uses. 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions: According to 1990 Census Data, 1.2 percent of Immokalee'area households lack complete plumbing for exclusive use. In the entire county, this figure is 0.2 percent. In occupied housing units in Immokalee according to the 1990 U.S. Census, 6.8 percent of the owner occupied units and 16 percent of the renter occupied units had more than 1.51 or more persons per room. This figure is .03 for the entire County reflecting a greater degree of overcrowding in the Immokalee area. - Based on the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study, there were a total of 4,957 housing units of those 1,282 or 26% are in need"of rehabilitation. In the immokalee study area, 19 unsafe buildings and 4 non-secure structures were identified from January 1998 to February 2000. • Sidewalks are almost entirely absent from the redevelopment area. • 16 • 9A • • There is a lack of street lighting in the most of the residential neighborhoods. Wide and deep open swales are present in the South Immokalee neighborhoods. They accumulate stagnate water and trash. The disposal of garbage in the Immokalee area is a problem. Lack of adequate dumpsters for the mobile home parks and commercial establishment's results in a serious litter problem. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District covers approximately 27 square miles and most of the Urban area of Immokalee. However, the geographic area served by the district is considerably smaller. Additional treatment plants and distribution lines will be needed to serve the entire community. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District is under a consent order from the Department of Environmental Protection due to insufficient handling of their effluent. The spray fields are inadequate. No new sewer hook-ups can be permitted unless the District can show.a reduction of flow to the system. There are a few separate collection systems that were permitted prior to the creation of the district. Those systems need to be upgraded and included within the district's authority. An example is the Baker Street area ,which is on a separate collection system. There have been three reported failures since 1997 where raw sewage was deposited on the ground. 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements: Surface water management problems are present within the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the roads are unpaved and poorly drained. In South Immokalee where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide. 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land: For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area. For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities or roadways, bridges or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow - into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The residential neighborhoods lack connection to one another. V In a primarily pedestrian community, there is a lack of an integrated sidewalk system connecting . residential areas with commercial establishments. There is no public transportation system. . The commercial lots along Main Street and First Street.lack adequate parking facilities. • 17 • • 9A • New Market Road does not adequately address the needs of the semi-trucks and trailers that transport the farm products out of the area. Heavy truck traffic on local streets intrudes residential neighborhoods and has had a negative impact on commercial redevelopment activities. SR 29 does not provide the number of lanes needed to adequately serve the Immokalee Regional Airpgrt and Industrial Park. • Housing Affordability las defined in Section 163.355 (8) F.S.J means: An area in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly. A housing unit is considered affordable if the monthly payments do not exceed 35 percent of the monthly income for principal, interests, taxes, and insurance. According to the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study 36 percent of the households with a mortgage and 40 percent of renter occupied households pay more . than 35 percent of their income for housing. According to the study of those persons making less than $10,000, 72 percent pay more than 35 percent of their income to rent. The median household income in 1990 according to the U.S. Census Bureau was $15,170. Forty-five percent of the population in Immokalee is below the poverty level. • The population growth, as well as high seasonal farm labor population, has produced a critical demand for housing according to the 1999 Empowerment Alliance of Southwest Florida Strategic Plan. There is a shortage of low and moderate income'housing in the Immokalee Community . — CONCLUSION OF FINDINGS OF BLIGHT It is the conclusion of this study that the Immokalee study area clearly has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout,faulty lot layout, unsafe or unsanitary conditions, and deterioration of a site or other improvements as set forth in Chapter 163 for designation as a blighted area and that rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of the lmmokalee study area is necessary and advisable in the furtherance of the public interest of residents of Collier County. • • • • • • 18 • 9A• . • • Section 4.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN Policy 4.2•of the Collier County Growth Management Plan supports redevelopment efforts in Immokalee as stated below: Policy 4.2 A detailed Master Plan for the Immokalee has been developed and was incorporated into this Growth Management Plan in February, 1991. The Master Plan addresses Natural Resources, Future Land Use, Public Facilities, Housing , Urban Design, Land Development Regulations and other considerations. Major purposes of the Master Plan shall be coordination of land use and transportation planning, redevelopment or renewal of blighted areas and elimination of land uses inconsistent with the community's character. • The Immokalee Redevelopment Area mirrors the area included in the Immokalee area Master Plan. The lmmokalee Area Master Plari (LAMP) was adopted by the Board of County in•1991 as a separate element of the Growth Management Plan due to the unique character of Immokalee. A separate Future Land Use Map was also adopted for Immokalee and is presented'in Figure 3 . The land uses available in the Immokalee area listed below. • Some inconsistencies with allowable residential density and land use exist where areas where platted years ago or mobile home parks were allowed to accommodate the large migrant population. There are several situations where residential is interspersed among commercial and industrial uses. The Planning-Services Department is currently conducting an analysis of the mobile home parks'and will be recommending amendments to the 1MAP to accommodate existing mobile home parks that are not consistent with the !MAP. The following section describes land use designations.shown on the lmmokalee Master Plan Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Residential Designation This designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential land uses including single-family, duplexes, multi-family, and mobile homes, which does not preclude seasonal,temporary and migrant • farm worker housing. 1. 'Low Residential District • The.purpose of this designation is to provide for a low-density residential district. Residential dwellings shall be limited to single-family structures and duplexes. Multi-family dwellings shall be permitted provided they are within a Planned Unit Development. Mobile home development shall be permitted in the form of mobile home sub-divisions or parks and as a mobile home overlay as defined by the Land Development Code. A density less than or equal to four(4) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted. 2. . Mixed Residential District The purpose of this designation is to provide for a mixture of housing types within medium density residential areas. Residential dwellings shall include single-family structure, multi-family dwellings, individual mobile homes, and duplexes on a lot by lot basis. A density less than or equal to six(6) dwellings units per gross acre is permitted. -- 19 • 9A • • • 3. High Residential District • The purpose of this designation is to provide for a district of high-density residential development, Residential dwellings shall be limited to multi-family structures and less intensive units such as single family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. Mobile homedevelopments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as defined in the Land Development Code, A density less than or equal to eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted. . • 4. Nonresidential Uses Non--residential uses permitted within the residential designation are limited to those uses that are compatible and/or support the residential character of the area. The allowed uses include: parks, open space and recreational uses, churches, libraries, cemeteries, public and private schools, day-care centers and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code. • Commercial Designation The designation is"intended to accommodate a variety of commercial land uses including neighborhood oriented commercial uses, commerce center uses, general highway commercial and commercial development within Planned Unit Developments. Migrant Labor Camps are also permitted within the Commercial designations. 1. Commercial District The purpose of this designation is to provide for retail,office,transient lodging facilities and highway commercial that serve the needs of the traveling public generally C-1 through C-4 Commercial Zoning Districts as identified in the Land Development Code. These commercial uses must be located on a major arterial or collector roadway. 2, Neighborhood Center District • The purpose of this land use classification is to provide for centers of activity that serves the needs of the surrounding neighborhoods. The centers should contain a mix of neighborhood-oriented uses such as day care center, parks, schools, and governmental activities. Other development criteria that shall apply to all neighborhood centers includes the following: a. To achieve a neighborhood character, these centers are encouraged to be anchored by elementary schools, neighborhood scale parks, and/or churches. • b. A center should be limited to 80-120 acres in size, and will serve a population ranging between 5,000 to 7,500 people,or accommodate a service area of one (1)mile radius. c. The Neighborhood Centers should be no closer than one(1) mile. d. Non-residential uses shall be at least 20% of the size of the Neighborhood Center. e. Residential development within the designated Neighborhoods Centers shall permit a maximum density of twelve (12)units per gross acre. - Residential dwelling units shall be limited to multi-family structures and less intensive units • such as single-family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. Mobile home developments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as defined in the Land Development Code. 20 9A ' I • • f. Commercial development shall be permitted within a Neighborhood Center provided all of the following criteria are met; • - I • 1. Commercial uses shall be limited°to barber and beauty shops; drug stores; deli; meat market; bicycle services; restaurant; dry cleaning;veterinary clinics; medical offices; laundry facilities; any other convenience commercial uses which is compatible in nature with the foregoing uses. The Collier County School Board will • be notified of any proposed use to avoid conflict with the nearby schools; and 2. No commercial use shall be permitted within a1/4 mile of an existing school property line within a Neighborhood Center; and 3. Access to the commercial development must in no way conflict with the school traffic in the area; and 4. The design of any proposed commercial development must take into consideration • the safety of the school children; and 5. The projects within the Neighborhood Centers shall encourage provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments; and 6. Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments; and 7. Projects directly abutting residentially zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a -- 50 foot setback and landscape buffer; and 6. Projects shall provide a 10 foot wide landscaped strip between the abutting right-of-way and the off-street parking area. From time to time new Neighborhood Centers may be proposed. No two centers may be closer than one mile from each other. New Neighborhood Centers would require market justification and must meet size, spacing and use criteria expressed earlier. 3. Commerce Center-Mixed Use District The purpose of this designation is to createa major activity center that services the entire Immokalee Urban Designated Area and surrounding agricultural area. The Mixed-Use District shall function as an employment center and shall encourage commercial and institutional uses. Uses permitted within this Sub-district shall include shopping center, governmental institutions, middle or high school, Community Park and other employment generating uses. Other permitted commercial uses shall include transient lodging facilities at 26 dwelling units per acre. The appropriate zoning districts include C-1 through C-4 as identified in the Land Development Code. In considering new commercial zoning, priority shall be given to protecting existing residential uses. Residential development is permitted within the mixed-use Sub-district at a maximum density of twelve (12) units per gross acre. Residential dwellings shall be limited to multi-family structures and less intensive units such as single-family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. Mobile home developments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as defined in the Land Development Code. • 21 9A The mixed-use district will be controlled via a series of performance standards that address issues of buffering, noise, signage, and lighting, architectural compatibility, and lot size, parking and landscaping. 4. Planned Unit Development Commercial District Commercial development shall be permitted within a Planned Unit Development provided the following size and development criteria are met. There are three(3) categories for PUD Commercial. The commercial component within a PUD will be allowed to develop up to the maximum acreage specified in the table below: CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY 11 CATEGORY III PUD Acres 80+ 160+ 300+ Maximum Commercial Acres 5 acres 10 acres 20 acres Permitted Zoning C-2 C-3 C-2, C-3 &C-4 In addition to the above criteria, the following standards must also be met: • • a. Commercial zoning shall be no closer than one(1) mile to the nearest commerce center and no closer than one mile from the nearest PUD commercial zoning of ten acres or greater in size; • i b. The configuration of the commercial parcel shall be no more frontage than depth unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners; C. Commercial zoning or development shall be no closer than a"/4 mile from the nearest existing elementary school boundary; and d. No construction in the commercial designated area shall be allowed until 30% of the project has commenced construction unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. Non-commercial Uses In addition to those mixed-uses permitted within the Commercial Designations, uses such as parks, open space and recreational uses, churches, libraries, cemeteries, public and private schools, day-care centers and those essential services as defined in the Land Development Code are permitted. 5. Residential/Tourist District The purpose of this District is to provide centers for recreational and tourism activity that utilizes the natural environment,as the main attraction. The centers should contain low Intensity uses that attract tourists and residents while preserving the environmental features of the area. Uses permitted in this district include, passive parks, nature preserves; wildlife sanctuaries; open space; museums; cultural facilities; marinas; transient lodging facilities including: hotel/motel, rental cabins, bed & breakfast establishments, campsites, restaurants; recreational vehicles; sporting and recreational camps; low- intensity retail; single family homes; agriculture; and those essential services as defined in the Land Development Code. Residential development is permitted at a density of less than or equal to four(4) dwelling units per gross acre. Transient lodging is permitted at a maximum density of eight (8) units per acre. Rezones are 22 • encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The minimum acreage requirement for a PUD shall be two (2) contiguous acres. 0 industrial Designation This designation is intended to accommodate a variety of industrial land uses such as industrial, .Commerce Center- Industrial, and Business Parks, 1. Industrial District The purpose of this designation is to provide industrial type uses including those uses.related to light manufacturing, processing,storage and warehousing, wholesaling, distribution, packing houses, recycling, high technology, laboratories, assembly, storage, computer and data processing, business services, limit commercial such as child care centers, and restaurants and other basic industrial uses but not including retail, as described in the Land Development Code for the Industrial and Business Park Zoning Districts. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district, including offices, retail sales, and structures which are customarily accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to permitted principal uses and structures are also permitted 2. Commerce Center -Industrial District The purpose of this designation is to create a major Activity Center that serves the entire lmmokalee Urban Designated Area and surrounding agricultural area. The Industrial District shall function as an employment center and shall encourage industrial and commercial uses as described in the Land Development Code for the Commercial (C-1 through C-5), industrial and Business Park Zoning Districts.- Higher intensity commercial uses including packing houses, industrial fabricatioh operation and • warehouses shall be permitted within this District. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district, including offices, retail sales, and structures which are customarily accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to permitted principal uses and structures are also permitted. 3. Business Park District Business Parks are intended to include a mix of industrial uses and offices designed in an attractive park-like environment with low structural density where building coverage ranges between 25%to 45% and where large landscaped areas provide for buffering and enjoyment by the employees and patrons of the Park. Business Parks shall comply with the following: a. Business Parks shall be permitted to develop with a maximum of 40% commercial uses, of the type identified in"c" below, to reserve land within the industrially designated areas for the intended industrial uses and to ensure compatibility. b. Access to arterial road systems shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Management Policy and consistent with Objective 7 and Policy 7.1 of the Traffic Circulation . Element. c. Commercial uses shall include, and shall be limited to, uses such as offices, financial institutions, cultural facilities, and fitness centers/facilities, and shall only be permitted within those areas zoned Business Park or Planned Unit Development within the Industrial • Designation. , d. Business Parks must be a minimum of 35 acres in size. The Planned Unit Development and/or rezoning ordinance document for Business Park projects shall contain specific language regarding the permitted non-industrialuses and development characteristic guidelines consistent with those stated above. 0 Non-Industrial Uses In addition to those industrial uses permitted within the Industrial Designation, uses such as those essential services as defined in the Land Development Code are permitted. 0 • • 23 9A r Y$ W • 4 f f • • f 4 a f • • > • j aq 4 4 4 4 • • 4 • • ♦ � O 1 • • • • • f i • • i q M • f f f • 1 / f f a i (� CC • • i $ 4 . , W k 33 14 4 > i f 1 , w C y yy �' i p YY • f a • f f J h 1 illE q Y.Y P; i, 5ii F §§ lq 5 i !Dooaoo . o inns a. NLIPoC7 11 . • r / • 1 / 6E 1 il, -, H - "i dW IlkSa 3- t i 'I Q 1 W II( _ • • sg mz � — - 111111 ' t_- • goo W < . • • �I a 1:`i u��ro ai J • aaawa' N 44 e W ' • ' `,\*` ` ' '•gym R � I f • > ^' W • y VOA `®�'�•��k. �`sN),\,,, • W,0<✓v_�`�\W`h 1 > 1 > ' > > > 4 4 141"_ 1111k SU mal k.skM. W \ \\ l`J 11 w \'\ Mer gq o - MI 1 li 4 IIP I le , 1 • 4 • > al 0 ) 4404404 - • f f 1P i i • • 4 f 1 1 1 • I > i i . 44444 > t + , r r > ► 1 4 1 • • • • • • 1 . • • ♦ • 1 • 1 1 • • • 1 • • • 44 f • • •r • 1 • i • • 1 0 $ 1 • 1 • 1 i • ♦ ♦ f f 1 1 i ♦ • • • • �•nn a 1 1 • • 1 • • 1 • / • 1 •Y • • •f ' 1 • • 1 • • 4 i 1 4 1 4• ' ' ' • ' ' ' • • ' N • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e C$ /y • i • 1 • • • • • ♦ • 1 • 1 i i Pg Kt+Q •i • • • • • • • • • 4 • • • 1 • „i4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I p a 4I 3p 4q • • • • • • • 1 • • • • 1 1 • > • 1 f f 1 1 f • 1 • 1 1 • • 1 ., 41 / ii-1- 1 �' �'u l5 6 • 1 • f • • • • ♦ 1 • • / / • / Y i- - • 1 f 1 $ 4 1 • • / • • 1 f • 1 59t7 1 I24 scvi • ) q • The TAMP, in addition to the general intent of the land use categories, the LAMP specifies a number of developments and redevelopment oriented goals, objectives, and policies, which directly or indirectly relate to the redevelopment of the area. The objectives that are applicable are listed below: Objective 11.2: By2005, improve the physical appearance of the commercial building stock by 10% in the Main Street Program area. • The CRA Plan is specifically designed to achieve the intent this objective in TAMP. Designation as ' Florida Main Street laid the foundation for a Community Redevelopment program in this community. The Main Street Program area is targeted for Phase I improvements. OBJECTIVE 11.3: ' Encourage innovative approaches in urban and project design, which enhance both the environment and the visual appeal of Immokalee. • OBJECTIVE 11.4: - Provide land use designations, criteria and zoning that recognize the needs of that significant portion of lmmokalee's population,which is primarily pedestrian in nature. • The Immokalee Overlay District has been adopted in the Collier County Land Development Code. The overlay is currently divided into six sub-districts, The purpose of this overlay district is to establish criteria suitable for the unique land use needs of the Immokalee Community. This plan supports the continued development of criteria in each sub-district to encourage redevelopment in the areas identified. The plan further acknowledges the need to provide design and flexible development standards in Immokalee OBJECTIVE III. 1: Collier County shall promote the conservation and rehabilitation of housing in Immokalee neighborhoods. OBJECTIVE 111.2: Collier County will respond to the housing needs identified in the housing study of Immokalee by county initiatives,which will reduce the cost of housing development for low and very low-income households. OBJECTIVE: 111.3 By January 1998 the County will have in place a pilot plan of innovative programs and regulatory reforms to reduce the costs of development and maintenance of safe, healthful; and affordable housing for low and very low income households in Immokalee. The Immokalee Redevelopment area plan proposes a comprehensive approach to encouraging the replacement of mobile homes; revitalization of existing housing stock; the provision of home ownership. opportunities; and encouraging infill development to strengthen viability of existing neighborhoods. • Goal VI and its related objectives and policies provide the framework for the connection of transportation issues and commercial revitalization. The interconnection of bike paths and sidewalks is included in the redevelopment plan for Phase I funding. The development of a loop road is identified in Phase II funding as well. This loop will have a positive impact on improving the Main Street area as well as improving truck movements through the town. r• 25• • - A '1 r GOAL VI: The Future land use pattern shall be supported by a network of roads, pedestrian ways, and bikeways that maintains Immokalee's small-town character, yet achieves efficient and safe traffic movement. • Objective VI.1: The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, motorized and non- • motorized vehicles. Goal VIII and related policies addresses one of the main objectives of the redevelopment area plan to improve the economic conditions of the area be encouraging new development and redevelopment. The redevelopment area plan specifically addresses the development of the lmmokalee Regional Airport and the industrial park. The recruitment of new industrial and warehousing uses to the Industrial Park are • strongly encouraged. The plan proposes to provide assistance-to recruit new businesses to the Airport through assistance in the permitting process, and economic assistance. In addition, the plan recognizes the need to increase code enforcement and sheriff patrols in the area. Goal VIII: Enhance and diversify the local economy of the Immokalee Community Policy VIIl.1.2: The Community Development and Environmental Services Division and the Airport Authority shall promote the development of the Immokalee Airport and surrounding commercial and industrial areas as set forth in the Immokalee Airport Master Plan. Policy VII1.1.3: Develop and initiate a program in 1997 to promote the incentives ofEnterprise Zone designation. . Policy V111.1.4: The Community Development and Environmental Services Division will coordinate with the Collier County Sheriffs Department on investigating and pursuing any funding opportunities available under the Safe Neighborhood Act to assist with enhancing the Immokalee community. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles shall be encouraged in all development standards. Section 4.4 COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES The Immokalee Community has a long history of community pride and activity. The first permanent settlers in Immokalee were recorded in 1872. The community received its current name"Immokalee" meaning "my home (in Seminole)in 1897 with the naming of the first post office. Lacking sufficient transportation to other commerce centers Immokalee remained isolated from the coastal towns and developed as an agricultural hub. Immokalee became the leading produce of winter vegetables in the United States. Due to the agricultural employment opportunities, the area has become ethnically mixed, as farm workers from Haiti,.Guatemala, and Mexico have made this area their home. Its ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity pose significant challenges since different groups often have different values, priorities, and even aesthetics. The cynical nature of agriculture creates major challenges in many aspects of the community including housing, workforce skills, economic pressures from Increased global competition and weather conditions. Nevertheless, the residents of this rural community have worked together to meet their challenges. In 1994, the community came together to prepare a grant application for the first round of the Federal Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community initiative. A strategic Plan was written based on community 26 • • 9A • input. Unfortunately, the community did not get selected as an Empowerment Zone or Enterprise Community. However, the work that went Into the planning process was not forgotten. In 1996, the • community applied for, and received, designation as a Florida Main Street area. This program was very successful in bringing technical resources to the community and provided direction on how to move - forward on a long awaited goal to improve the physical condition of the downtown area. This group was instrumental in,preparing for the second round of Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community grants that . were announced by the Federal government in 1998. Five community meetings were held, each with over 100 participants. The Strategic Plan that was developed through this community process Is the • basis of the Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan. • An lmmokalee Community Redevelopment Advisory Committee will be appointed following plan adoption to monitor the implementation of the redevelopment area plan. There are_ four main areas of concern identified by the community. The goals and objectives are listed below: Economic Development Goal • Diversify the economic base of the community by focusing on agricultural production, processing and research; industrial development including manufacturing, distribution and aviation services; and nature tourism. Objective: Increase Small Business Start-Ups And Expansions Objective: Develop Nature Tourism Objective: Recruit New Businesses To immokalee And Airport Objective: Nurture Entrepreneurial Business Development and Retention Objective: Expand Research Opportunities in the Health Care Industry -- Objective: Encourage renovation of structures and infill development in the Main Street Program Area. Objective: Increase public transportation opportunities through the community and to outlining areas. . Objective: Develop a loop road to serve the truck traffic • Housing Goal To Provide Safe,Affordable Housing To All Zone Residents Objective: - 'Ensure That Land Is Available At Or Below Market Rate To Build Affordable Housing. Objective: Develop a Public/Private Housing Initiative For New Construction For Both Ownership And Rental For Low,Very Low And Moderate Priced Housing. Objective: Improve the Condition of Owner-Occupied Homes through Rehabilitation and Eliminate • Substandard Housing Through Code Enforcement Activities. Objective: Improve the condition.of Rental-occupied housing through rehabilitation and code enforcement activities. Objective: Create incentives to replace existing mobile homes with upgraded mobile or manufactured • homes. Community image Goal . To-Enhance The Image And The Perception Of The Community As A Safe, Friendly, Family Oriented Small Town. Objective: Maximize Current Recreational Activities. Objective: Create Recreation/Cultural Opportunities In Cooperation With Business, Existing Youth Development Programs, And Schools, Objective: Develop Cadre Of Volunteers To Serve the community Objective: Create Community Based And Neighborhood Based Beautification Projects. • ii • 27 9A • • • • • Objective: Increase The Number Of Cultural Activities To Celebrate Community Spirit, Objective: Create an incentive program for litter Control And Neighborhood Cleanups. • Objective: Create a Code Enforcement Program that is not complaint driven. • Objective: Increase Community Policing activities in the community. Objective: Provide safe and convenient movement of pedestrians throughout the community ' Objective: Develop a program to improve dirt lots in the Main Street area that will eliminate the dust and dirt that accumulates in the downtown area. Section 4.5 REDEVELOPMENT AREA CHARACTERISTICS AND ANAYSIS ' The following provides an analysis of the existing conditions of the Immokalee Redevelopment area. • - Figure_ provides a map of the proposed redevelopment area boundaries. A diagram of the existing conditions is provided in the form of a large fold-out map contained in the Appendix B of this document. The map indicates current`zoning, parcel lines, parks, schools, public facilities, and streets. No change is proposed to existing public open space in the Immokalee Community. Redevelopment Area Characteristics Located in northeastern Collier County, the Immokalee Community is located approximately 45 miles from the County seat of Naples. This rural un-incorported area is primarily agricultural. There is one major roadway—Immokalee Road or CR 846-Into the community from Naples. State Road 29 provides access into the Community from the northern counties of Lee and Hendry. Although there are approximately 16,764 acres of land within the redevelopment area, 60%is currently in agricultural use. -The remaining land is a mixture of residential, commercial and industrial uses. The estimated 1998 permanent population of lmmokalee is 17,806. However, the population'nearly doubles during the winter months due to the agricultural industry. This increase occurs when the harvest season for vegetables and citrus is at its peak. The 1998 projected peak season population for Immokalee is 32,929. The lmmokalee population is considerably different from Collier County as a whole. The 1990 median age in Immokalee is estimated at 21 while the Collier County median age is estimated at 41. In 1990, 65% of Immokalee's population was of Hispanic Origin,which may be of any race, in comparison to 8% of the remainder of Collier County's population being of Hispanic Origin. The • 1990 Household Median Income in Immokalee.was $15,170 in comparison to Collier County's median household income of$34,001. According to the 1990 U.S. Census 45% of the population was below • poverty level. Housing Stock • - There were 5,166 units reported by the Bureau of the U.S. Census in 1990, only 18% were vacant. Within the total number of units occupied in Immokalee the average person per household rate for owner occupied units is 3.86 and the rate for renter occupied units is 3.57. The number of mobile homes/trailers reported by the 1990 Census is 1805. According to the Census the bulk of housing was constructed between 1970 to 1988. Seven percent of the existing housing stock was built prior to 1960. • The 1994.1mmokalee Housing Study reported 1,282 housing units in need of rehabilitation or demolition. Sixty percent of the units in need of rehabilitation were mobile homes. A large portion of the housing stock is used to house the migrant farm population. Overcrowding and deteriorated structures have been sited by the Florida Health Department that monitors migrant camps. 28 • The dwelling units are primarily.cinder block homes with some wood framed houses built by Habitat for Humanity. There are several multi-family apartment complexes. Commercial Stock South Immokalee consists of older small commercial buildings, The Main Street Corridor has'a few vacant structures, some of which are in need of rehabilitation or demolition. Newer commercial development has occurred along SR29. This new development is primarily strip highway commercial. , The Plan identifies developing specific standards for this corridor as part of the Immokalee Overlay • District. New Market Road is a mixture ofindustrial packinghouse facilities and small older commercial building:This area is also scheduled to have an Overlay developed to meet the specific needs of this commerce center. Employment Opportunities Most of the County's agricultural production occurs in and around Immokalee. The largest employment sector is in agricultural. Individuals working on farms are substantially below those working in other jobs. In 1986, the average weekly wage of a person working in agriculture was $102 as compared•to those in the retail trade sector that earned an average of weekly wage of$209. A large number of the residents of Immokalee travel to Naples to work in the service, construction or landscape industry. The majority of professional people who are employed in Immokalee live outside of the area. In 1996, the five largest employers in Immokalee are: Collier County Schools(1,089); Six-L's Packing (600); Seminole Indian Casino (306); Marion E. Fether Medical Clinic(170) and N.T. Gargiulo (98), • -- There are a large number of small retail establishments scattered throughout the community to serve the migrant population who are primarily pedestrians. • Land Use Characteristics=General Existing South Immokaee The South Immokalee area is approximately 300 acres with 77% of it developed. It is a primarily a mixture of residential land uses containing 81% of the land area; There is a concentration of mobile homes located west of South 1St Street and East of South 9th Street. The remaining area is commercial with 17% and industrial with one percent. The residential uses located west of South 1st street are. considered non-conforming uses. There is a small percentage of commercial development in the residentially zoned area. These uses are also considered non-conforming. The majority of lots within this area are non-conforming as well. Rebuilding on these properties may require the property owner to seek a variance from the development standards of the zoning district or to aggregate property to meet the regulations. The majority of buildings in this area where in built in the 1970's. The highest concentration of criminal activity in the community takes place in this area. There are few streetlights • and few internal sidewalks. Large open swales exist along the neighborhood streets. The Neighborhood Park located in this area provides minimal recreational opportunities. Main Street Program Area • The Main Street area is anchored by the Seminole Indian Casino at the'South end of town and the historic Roberts Ranch site on the west end of Main Street. The Main Street Boundaries include theland adjacent to CR846 (First Street) and SR29 (Main Street) . It is primarily commercial property that has been under utilized. The main intersection (First and Main Street) has two prime commercial corners vacant. Older residential and mobile homes are found abutting commercial development with little or no buffering. Commercial zoning along with a mixture of mobile home, older single family and multi-family '29 • Y H • units. The housing in this area is in serious need of rehabilitation. There are no sidewalks on the local streets north or south of Main Street and open drainage ditches are present. The Immokalee Beautification Committee has recently completed the streetscape along this corridor, which includes street lighting and street furniture. The Main Street program has been offering a Façade Grant program as an incentive for renovations to take place. To date five businesses have participated. Many of the buildings need more'that just a façade improvement. There are several parking lots that are not up to code and result in creating dust and dirt along the corridor,which makes it more difficult to maintain the landscaping. Several buildings are vacant. • New Market Road - New Market Road is the east-west connector in the community. It serves as the main corridor for truck traffic corning to and from the agricultural packinghouses. Much of the existing right of way is used for - truck parking and outdoor sells of vegetables during the harvest season. During the winter months this is a hub of activity. The area is zoned commercial from Glades to Charlotte Street and the residential from Glades to SR29. The residential units along new market road are newer and built on larger lots than those in South lmmokalee. Truck Traffic through the residential area has a negative impact on maintaining the value of the area.There are few streetlights and sidewalks in the residential sections of the area. Immokalee Drive Immokalee Drive is a two-lane facility that runs west of SR29 to 1st street. There is a mixture of mobile home parks, single and multi-family structures. The Collier County sports complex and Immokalee High School and Middle School is located along this corridor. Several older mobile home parks that do not meet current standards are found along this corridor. There is limited street lighting or sidewalks along the local streets that intersect Immokalee. SR 29 Corridor This four-lane facility has been developed with highway commercial uses and is the main shopping area in the community. There is a mixture of new and old development along this corridor. The one grocery chain that is opened in the community is located in an older strip shopping center at the corner of Lake Trafford and SR29. Although a large number of residents do not have vehicle sidewalks are not available on both sides of the street and may not be continuous. Lake Trafford The Lake Trafford area consists of the largest fresh water lake in.Florida south of Lake Okeechobee, The lake is an integral part of the regional drainage and wetland systems, and coastal estuarine systems. Economic and,environmental enhancement of the lake necessitates the removal of an estimated 8.5• million cubic yards of organic sediment from the lake to restore the lake's depth and bottom configuration to its quartz sand bottom; and reduce by as much as one half the nutrient enrichment to the lake. This nutrient enrichment results in proliferation of aquatic plant growth, periodic algae blooms, and fish kills. The Lake restoration project should begin in 2000.The goal of the project is to improve, restore, and enhance the tourism attractiveness of Lake Trafford. Recreational fishing, bird watching, and photography can draw a significant number of visitors to an area. The Lake Trafford Marina currently operates the only small concession stand on the lake.The marina sells bait, rents small boats, and --provides airboat tours of the lake. There is a County owned park, boat ramp and pier at the end of Lake Trafford. On the north side of the lake is a 2000-acre, privately held ranch. The ranch does limited cattle and oil production. There is an older recreational vehicle park next to the marina. • Airport and Industrial Park -_ The Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park consists of over 1000 acres. There is a pre- • approved master site development plan for the first Phase of development consisting of approximately 44 30 9A • • acres. The Airport Authority offers many incentives to businesses to locate in the industrial'park. It is a • designated as a Foreign Trade Zone, Florida Enterprise Zone and a Foreign Entrepreneurial Investment Zone. There is water and sewer available for phase I. A 10,000 square foot manufacturing incubator was opened in 1998 and is completely leased out. It has been difficult to recruit a business to open in this location given the poor housing conditions and lack of amenities in the community; A drag strip has opened at one end of the Airport and has been successful in drawing drivers and spectators. Farm workers Village Farm workers Village is located approximately 1.8 miles from the center of the community. The Village is - owned and operated by the Collier County Housing Authority. There are 576 units built and 35 units 'planned but not yet built. The Village contains a small convenience store,.day care, and playgrounds. The first phase of the development occurred in 1974 with 150 units. All the units are cement block. There is no public transportation available between the village and the commercial core of the community. Village Oaks Elementary School is located across from Farm Workers Village across SR 29.. A raised pedestrian bridge across SR 29 provides access between the village and the school. Section 4.6 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (AREA WIDE) • STREETS The roadway network east of SR-29 in the lmmokalee community is primarily composed of local roads, which are configured in a traditional grid pattern. The area west of SR-29, North of Main Street could be. best described as an incomplete roadway network. The Lake Trafford Road corridor contains an incomplete grid pattern, although the framework for one exists. Lake Trafford,which is beginning to experience periods of severe congestion, could be greatly improved if improvements were made to complete a basic grid network and widen this two-lane facility to accommodate boats and recreational vehicles. Eustis Avenue in South lmmokalee provides east-west movement between 9t' Street and First Street (CR-846). It continues approximately 1,500 feet East of First Street serving a small residential area. If Eustis Ave were extended to SR-29, it would provide an east-west alternative,and further support the grid concept. Bethune Avenue and south 9th Street deadline in the south lmmokalee area. • • The major arterial roadways are State Road 29, lmmokalee Road and New Market Road (SR 29A). • State Road 29 is a two-lane facility that widens to four lanes through the small downtown area. The four- - lane segment is called Main Street and,is the focus of redevelopment and economic revitalization. It is the only segment with on-street parking and sidewalks on both sides. The two lane segments of State Road 29 north and east of Main Street are two lanes with no sidewalks. Trucks are encouraged to use New Market Road as an alternate to Main Street to avoid the downtown area. • New Market Road is a two-lane facility. with 100 feet of right-of-way -and no sidewalks or paved shoulders. Remaining right-of-way and truck parking is limestone. Vegetable and fruit packing houses • and the State Farmers Market are located along this street. Trucks.use this street as a bypass road to avoid the downtown area and to-pick up goods for transport. The roadway is in poor condition and maintenance costs are high due to damage by trucks dragging limestone on roadway. Although many people walk or bicycle to work in this area, pathway facilities are unavailable. A loop road was purposed . in 1991 during the preparation of the lmmokalee Master Plan.. The road would provide relief to the ' downtown and neighborhood areas from trucks hauling produce to and from the packing houses. • 31 9A , • First Street(CR 846) intersects with SR 29 at the beginning of Main Street. It is four lanes south of Main Street with sidewalks on both sides. North of Main.Street it narrows to two lanes and has a sidewalk on the west side only, ' • Major problems exist along many of the local roads. There are few sidewalks. Typical street widths are less than twenty feet and open storm water systems are adjacent toroadways without paved shoulders or guardrails-. For example, south of State Road 29, along 91h Street, there are deep, wide drainage . ditches on both sides'of the roadway.There are no sidewalks and no guardrails to safeguard pedestrians . and motorists. The roadway width is eighteen'feet and there are notenough rights of way to construct pathway facilities without converting the open swales to a covered stormwater system • SEWER AND WATER .Public potable water and wastewater•services are provided by the lmmokalee Water and Sewer District. This district was created by a special act of the Florida Legislature. The District covers roughly twenty- seven square miles. Until 1989, special districts were largely autonomous and had little interaction with local governments: Beginning in 1991,each independent special district is required to submit an annual report to the appropriate local government. WATER . • • While some households draw their potable water from private wells the vast majority of the Immokalee residents receive water from the lmmokalee Water and Sewer District. Although the district boundaries extend 27.square miles, the actual service area is.much smaller. SANITARY SEWER • Wastewater treatment is also provided by the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. The central wastewater collection,treatment and disposal system was designed in the late seventies and was constructed and in operation by 1982. The system which is comprised of 80 miles of sewer pipe, 34 lift stations, and a 2.5 MGD treatment. The district owns 640-acre spray field and irrigates approximately 350 acres with treated effluent. However, the Immokalee Water and Sewer District is under a consent order from the Department of Environmental Protection due to insufficient handling of their effluent. The spray fields are inadequate. No new sewer hook-ups can be permitted unless the District can show a reduction of flow to the system. There are a few separate collection systems that were permitted prior to the creation of the district. - Those systems need to be upgraded and included within the district's authority. • Additional treatment plants and distribution lines will be needed to serve the entire community. DRAINAGE -. Both man-made and natural drainage systems'collect and transport surface water run-off which occur during and immediately following rainfall.' The two major facilities can function independently of one another or in combination. Due to the relatively flat topography of Immokalee, drainage occurs in sheet flow pattern within a very.shallow but wide depression classified as a slough. Man-made facilities in Immokalee are typically large open swales. - Surface water management problems are present within-the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the,roads. are unpaved and poorly drained. In South Immokalee,where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide Surface water management problems are present within the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include 32 9A • • localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within , the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the roads are unpaved and poorly-drained. in South immokalee where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide. ENVIRONMENTAL The Freshwater Marshes habitat around immokalee is connected to the slough/swamp system known as Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary and together the two habitats serve two primary purposes as primary • • water storage areas and drainage ways for surface flow. Undeveloped marshes should be preserved as part of the natural protection areas. - - Immokalee has good,groundwater availability with good development potential of the water table aquifer. There are lands identified on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map as environmentally sensitive areas. This designation is for informational purposes only; it doesn't constitute new development standards and has no regulatory effect. ELEVATION There is not a flood map for the Immokalee community. Therefore, none of Immokalee is in a Flood zone as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Administration. The immokalee Community as a whole is one of the highest points in the County. OPEN SPACE There is significant vacant land in the Immokalee Community. However, the majority of itis in/or has been in agricultural production. Most of the parcels are large and under one ownership. The cost of small parcels of land within in the community is considerable higher than comparable parcels in surrounding communities. However,there are opportunities for open space amenities. In terms of recreation use, the.lmmokalee community has six park facilities within the Study Area. Two are relatively passive parks containing picnicking facilities, benches, and observation areas. One is • located next to the Airport(5 acres) and the other is at Lake Trafford (2.3 acres).•The remaining parks, Immokalee Community Park(23 acres) on Immokalee Drive adjacent to the High School, South Immokalee Park (3,2 acres)which houses the American Legion building and a baseball field, Tony Rosbough Park(6,8 acres) off of Little League Road has two baseball fields, and the Immokalee Recreation/Aquatic Facility (14 acres) located at the Immokalee Middle School site has a-swimming pool and is considered a community park. There is a total of 54 acres presently in recreation use. In addition, the schools in Immokalee have their own recreation areas for physical education programs and interscholastic sports programs. Children under 14 years old comprise a significant percentage of immokalee's total population: 29% or 3,186 people, according to the 1990 Census. Recreation facilities are necessary to meet the needs of this population. •COMMUNITY FACILITIES - PUBLiC SAFETY • The Immokalee Community is served by the Immokalee Fire Control District. an independent fire district. The service encompasses 215 square miles. There are two fire stations. One station is located on Carson Road and the other is situated on New Market Road. Emergency Medical Service is provided by,the County EMS department and has a station located on First Street(CR846). • • 33 • 9A , • The Collier County Sheriff's Department provides police protection to the community. In 1994 a new immokalee substation was built at the Government complex in Immokalee. In 1996, there were 52 employees at the substation including road patrol and support staff. A community--policing program was initiated in 1996. Due to the young age of the population in the redevelopment there are several elementary schools in the area, along with a middle school and high school IMMOKALEE SERVICE AREA SCHOOLS (1) Early Childhood School: The Learning Center • - (2) Elementary Schools: Highlands; Lake Trafford, Pinecrest, Village Oaks (3) Middle Schools: Immokalee Middle (4) High Schools: Immokalee High (5) Adult Education: Bethune Education Center • There is one County operated Library in the area Health Care • There is not a hospital in the community. There is the Marion E. Feather Health Clinic that is affiliated with the Collier Community Hospital. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 34 9A Section 4.7 Redevelopment Area Goals Develop a circulation pattern for the community, which will provide safe and efficient access throughout the community. This network would Include a loop road to provide the separation of commercial truck traffic from tourist designated places and residential developments. Enhance the physical appearance of properties within the Main Street area. Provide opportunities for adequate, safe, and affordable housing. Encourage the development of both affordable rental and home ownership through rehabilitation and new construction. Develop a program to address the replacement of existing old mobile homes with newer mobile home units or module homes. Provide opportunities for capturing the tourist trade by creating eco-tourism opportunities at Lake Trafford, Peppers Ranch, and Roberts Ranch. Create adaptive development standards in each of the subdistricts identified in the lmmokalee Overlay District to permit flexibility and incentives for redevelopment and development. Encourage neighborhood stability through the implementation of additional streetlights, sidewalks, and landscaping throughout the community. Improve the drainage system throughout the community and improve the appearance and function of the • open drainage swales through out the community. • ' Diversify the economy by encouraging the recruitment of businesses to the lmmokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. Improve both the landside and airside facilities at the lmmokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park to meet the future demands for all forms of aviation and business development activities. • Section 4.8 PHASE I -REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES Achieving the goals of the lmmokalee Redevelopment Plan begins with a'focus.on South lmmokalee, • Main Street, New Market Road and the lmmokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. The Plan focuses on Phase I activities (Year 1-5) and becomes more general into the future. Since planning is by . nature an evolutionary process, each phase of activity attempts to build upon the successful outcome of earlier phases. Figure 6 identifies the areas of concentration during Phase I. Based on the analysis and the redevelopment goals the following activities were identified for.each of the redevelopment subareas in Phase I: . South lmmokalee . Prepare a Stormwater Master Plan for the area that identifies alternatives to the open drainage swales • located throughout the subarea and begin implementation. • 35 9A . Figure 4 ' • • i. . i S 917 i I S Lb W • 1tI __ W 0 m • �X {t 0 ,� ___CO t; w zd., co {_ w ci S :5 1 :. .,„--1 /'• c• I 1h /i r vi r; . in ' IP c0 • N . iitiV N t NlIN J _ WN CO n6 ' V) s W f r i J,* �.a 6 Lit aa¢ N D .. 4I0 1.1.10.ON MII111 09'W3 • • ijj N 41Im Ili 11. C) — - -iz•a s itW ii,.'111( to oo- N.W i � o k a e 11. 0 o ff. l . : — t:. • . q_., .N its z ________a_ • NIII ! + W Eat N .� • a Nico n X o � iit • (- + • S 9b .L S Lb 1 • 36 • 9A I Develop a streetlighting plan for the area and begin to install streetlights In"hot spots" as identified by the Sheriff's Department as high crime areas. Support the development of single family homes on the along the old Atlantic Coastline Railroad Right of Way by developing approved housing plans that meet the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Criteria and Traditional Neighborhood Design that are cost effective. Coordinate with the Collier County Housing Authority to develop these homes. Evaluate the current placement of commercial uses within the neighborhood, approximately from Boston Avenue south to Bethune Avenue and from 16th Street SE west to Ninth Street, Develop a program to encourage private property owners to renovate or demolish existing structures. Provide a rehabilitation'or replacement of substandard housing within the neighborhood. Property may need to be acquired with in this subarea for the implementation of housing and economic development initiatives. Establish or coordinate with an existing non-profit corporation to promote neighborhood revitalization program including housing rehabilitation, land assembly, credit counseling and home maintenance. Promote the development of the One-Stop Career Center as a community focal point. Evaluate the need for neighborhood parks in the community and develop them as appropriate. • Main Street Program Area Develop a program to eliminate the dust that accumulates along Main Street and in the landscaped medians. The program may include placement of sod or resurfacing parking lots. • Leverage the Main Street Facade program to encourage the private sector to renovate, demolish, or construct buildings within the Main Street Program area, • Develop a Main Street Business Association to work on coordination and implementation of the redevelopment program. • Develop a trash incentive program that will provide an incentive to pick up and properly dispose of empty containers and trash within the community. Property rrlay need to be acquired within this subarea for commercial or residential development. Provide interconnection of sidewalks from the local streets perpendicular with Main Street to Main Street. Support the development of the Robert's Ranch Historical site as a tourist destination and a living museum. Encourage the development of appropriate,uses and buffers on the remaining portion of the home site. Provide for the rehabilitation or demolition of substandard housing. • Coordinate with a non-profit corporation to coordinate marketing efforts to attract compatible businesses to the Main Street Area and improve the physical appearance. • • 37 • 9A Develop a revolving loan fund for business start ups or expansion for businesses locating any where in• the community. • . New Market Road • Based on the Immokalee Transportation Study, identify the alignment for a loop road that will serve the industrial uses along New Market Road and relieve the western portion of New Market Road from truck traffic. Support expanding the uses of the State Farmers Market to allow for resale activities and encourage upgrading the facade of the facility to make it more user-friendly and a tourist destination. Develop incentives to diversify the agricultural production and expand production'to higher value crops. Encourage commercial infill and rehabilitation through flexible development standards and incorporate them into the Immokalee Overlay District, New Market Subdistrict. Lake Trafford Encourage the continued development and improvement to the Lake Trafford Marina and park to bring • tourists into the area. Develop Pepper's Ranch and Preserve into an eco-tourism destination, promote transient lodging facilities and restaurants for this area. Revitalize the neighborhoods adjacent to Lake Trafford Road through a comprehensive housing improvement project that will include increase code enforcement, economic incentives for replacement • and rehabilitation of mobile homes and the development or rehabilitation of single and multi-family • structures. Install additional streetlights and sidewalks to increase safety in the area. lmmokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park • Expand the Service Center at the Immokalee Manufacturing Incubator to other businesses in the community Market the Foreign Trade Zone and Industrial Park. Develop sites, provide infrastructure;make lease payments, pay principal and interest on debt, buy equipment and ahy other items needed to re-locate or retain businesses in the Industrial Park. Provide infrastructure and participate in the cost of other facilities in the development of a motor-sports racing complex at the Airport. Develop standards for controls, restrictions and covenants for the lease of land and for land development regulations. Provided needed infrastructure improvements when necessary to recruit new businesses or to expanded existing businesses at the Airport/Industrial Park. • • • • 38 • • 9 • •• Neighborhood Revitalization/Housing Programs Establish a process to foreclose on properties that have tax liens and make that land available for • affordable housing Develop incentives for the construction of new affordable housing in the community including reduced permitting fees, land costs, and processing time. Coordinate with Code Enforcement,the Sheriffs Department and the Department of Revenue to enforce existing codes and develop new regulations that are appropriate to the needs of the community. Maintain, enhance or develop neighborhood parks throughout the community that are safe and convenient for the residents. • Section 4.9 Future Phases Phase II - Years 5-10 • • Continued emphasis on economic development and public/private partnership to redevelop the Main • Street Program area and the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. Neighborhood Revitalization will continue and expand into the areas located off of lmmokalee Drive and SR 29 The following activities are planned for Phase II: •- Continue active marketing of the community as a touristdestination. Activities could include assistance with land acquisition, public/private ventures for building improvements, and other marketing incentives. • Continue to support and coordinate with the lmmokalee Beautification MSTU efforts and support the expansion of the MSTU boundaries to include the rest of the community • Expand commercial rehabilitation grant to all other areas, • • Continue land assembly for the development of new affordable housing • Continue to install streetlights and sidewalks and shade trees throughout the community. • Complete the construction of the Lobp Road and other roadway improvements as needed to provide . the alternative truck route, moving the trucks out of Main Street. • Coordinate with the Parks and Recreation Department to maintain and improve open space and • recreation opportunities in the community. • Coordinate with Farrmworkers Village to develop programs that move tenants from renter housing to home ownership. • • • • 39 • • 9A Phase Ill —.Years 10-20 • Emphasis will be stabilization of neighborhoods and the economic vitality of the community. The . .following activities will be undertaken: • Continue land assembly for the future development of affordable housing and economic • development. • • Continued commercial rehabilitation for all areas. - i • Continued marketing of the area as a tourist destination. • Continue infrastructure improvements including roads, drainage, sewer and water expansion, and sidewalks • Continue neighborhood revitalization in all areas. • • • • • • • •• • • • • 4O • • • .A • • •Section 4.90 Neighborhood Impact Statement The structure of the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan was specifically organized to have a positive impact on housing and residential neighborhoods by providing incentives to rehabilitate and replace unsafe housing:The intensive redevelopment activities recommended in the plan concentrate on existing • commercial and semi-industrial areas including the Immokalee Regional Airport/Industrial Park. • With the specific objective of enhancing the existing residential neighborhoods of the area, the • Immokalee Redevelopment Plan recommends a comprehensive approach to revitalizing neighborhoods. The emphasis in the Plan is to provide incentives to property owners to renovate or replace substandard housing. In addition to housing the following other improvements are recommended: - Connecting local streets to improve internal circulation. - Stimulating development of additional housing on vacant lots • - improving stormwater management - Improving sewer service to neighborhoods - Improving interconnections between neighborhoods and commercial developments . Improving trash collection in neighborhoods - Providing pro-active code enforcement - Installing streetlighting and landscaping to promote pedestrian activities - Develop neighborhood parks that will provide recreational activities • General Impacts: Since the provision of supportive services to existing residents and the additional low • and moderate income housing in the area are primary objectives of the plan, the overall impacts of the proposed redevelopment program are expected to be positive, with few negative impacts anticipated. The proposed direct redevelopment activities are anticipated to displace a minimal amount of residents of affordable housing. It is anticipated that residents that may be temporarily displaced will have a better quality product to choose from due to the redevelopment efforts, Relocation: As stated above, the proposed redevelopment activities were specifically developed to minimize residential relocation. For any relocation that is required, this plan contains a proposed relocation policy that will provide supportive services and equitable financial support to any individuals or families that are subject to relocation o Traffic circulation: The proposed street improvements in the community were conceived with the specific intent of reducing the negative impacts of inappropriate through traffic. The loop road is intended to reduce truck traffic in the New Market neighborhood and the Main Street area. Thereby improving the area. There should be minimal need for any relocation to build the loop road. • Environmental quality: - Water, Quality: The proposed redevelopment activities and the proposed stormwater master • plan for the Immokalee community will serve to enhance stormwater quality in the area. The • redevelopment activities will pipe and cover the open swales which are nuisance and health concern in the neighborhoods. • -Availability of community facilities and services: A primary objective of the redevelopment plan is increased delivery of all types of community services. Therefore, the impacts of the proposed program should be positive. The primary community facility in the area is the Shadowlawn Elementary School. The proposed activities should have no negative impacts on the school. 41 . . 9A i Section 4.10 Program of Public Expenditures This section focuses on the public sector investment costs and sources of funds to carry out Phase I improvements for the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan. Discussion of the mechanisms for managing and packaging capital investments and the CRA redevelopment financing strategy is provided in Section 2 of this plan. The program of public expenditures (see Table One)summarizes the public expenditures to be made in the lmmokalee redevelopment area. The Table identifies the projects, total costs(when available), local appropriations, and other potential sources of funding including Tax Increment Revenues. • The Plan does not include specific allocation of tax increment revenues. Instead, the plan identifies tax increment revenues as a potential source of funding for redevelopment projects. The dollar amount for each project will be determined at a later date. Costs and funding sources will be refined with input from the Immokalee Redevelopment Advisory Committee and the program of public expenditures amended by CRA Board action when appropriate. TABLE One ' Proposed Publicly Funded Capital Projects and Other Proposed Projects Project Name Total TIF Local Source Local Capital Projects Cost Funds lmmokalee Football/Soccer $ 110,000 $110,000 AdValorem/Impact _ Fees Robert's PUD/North 11th St. $ 170,000 $170,000 Gas Tax lmmokalee Stormwater Master Plan $ 580,000 Grants Sidewalks - $ 367,000 $367,000 MPO lmmokalee Mobility Study $ 25,000 • $25,000 MPO South lmmokalee - Stormwater Management Improvements TBDLMSBU/grants Streetlights - TBDL MSTU/grants ' Land Acquisiton TBDL Grants Commercial Rehabilitation TBDL ' Grant, Main Street Housing Development TBDL Grants Permitting/Development Fees • TBDL . Marketing TBDL Grants Main Streef Program Parking Lot Improvements TBDL MSTU/grants Commercial Rehabilitation TBDL - Grants Trash Incentive Program - TBDL Grants 42 9A TABLE One-continued . Project Name Total TIF Local Source Funds Land Acquisiton TBDL Grants Permitting/Development Fees TBDL . Sidewalks TBDL Grants/state/local Enclose drainage swales TBDL Grants/state/local/MSB U Roberts Ranch Historic Site TBDL Grants/state/local/fed • Marketing 9 TBDL Grants New Market Road - Loop Road Construction TBDL Impact Fees/Grants/Gas Tax Renovation to.State Farmers Market TBDL Grants/state Zoning Overlay -AdValorem Lake Trafford Marketing • TBDL AdValorem Land Acquisiton TBDL Grants Permitting/Development Fees TBDL Grants Housing Development TBDL Grants Housing Rehabilitation TBDL Grants Streetlights TBDL Grants Sidewalks TBDL . - Grants Neighborhood Revitalization Land Acquisiton TBDL Grants Permitting/Development Fees S TBDL • Grants Infrastructure Improvements TBDL Grants Landscaping TBDL Grants Park improvements TBDL Grants • • • 43 i . 9A • i ' • Table One Continued Immokalee Regional Airport&Immokalee Regional Park Project Name Total TIF Local Source Rehabilitate Runway 9-27 Lights $ 175,000 $35,000 Replacement and refurbishing of runway lights along Runway 9-27 • _ Construct Taxiway- Phase I $ 162,500 $32,500 Construction of taxiway from . . . . runway system to new t-hangar building. _ + Taxiway Phase II $ . 162,500- $32,500 Construction of taxiway from runway system to new t-hangar • building. Environmental Mitigation $ 55,000- $ 11,000 : Remove wetland from proposed taxiway and t-hangar development area and mitigate for environmental impact. Bulk Storage Hangar $ 400,000 $200,000 Construct a bulk storage/maintenance hangar. T-hangar Building $ 500,000 $250,000 Construct a t-hangar building with taxilane. Bulk Storage Hangar $ 460,000 - $230,000 • Construct a bulk storage I maintenance hangar. . T-hangar Building $ 455,000 $227,500 • _ Construct a t-hangar building with taxilane. T-hangar Building $, 509,000 $254,500 • Construct a t-hangar building with taxilane. 44 . 9A • • • Table One Continued Protect Total Cost TIF LOCAL SOURCE FUNDS T-hangar Building $ 475,000 $237,500 Construct a t-hangar building with taxilane. Conceptual ERP $ 350,000 $70,000 Rehabilitate Runway 18-36 $ 600,000 $120,000 - Rehabilitate runway 9-27- $ 600,000 $120,000 Rehabilitate Runway 18-36 to address safety issues. Expand Apron $ 350,000 $70,000 Rehabilitate Runway 9-27 to address safety issues. - -Expand aircraft parking demands to meet parking Demands. Emergency Generator $ 100,000 $20,000 Acquire and install emergency generator. U:S. Customs Facility $ 230,000 $46,000 Construct a U.S. Customs Facility and aircraft apron. Runway Extension - Design and DRI $ 250,000 $12,500 Phase Design and permit extension of Runway Runway Extension-Construction $ 1,750,000 $87,500 Construct extension of Runway Taxiway Phase Ii $ 162,500 $32,500 ' Construction of taxiway from runway system to new t-hangar building. Manufacturing Incubator Phase II $ 480,000 $48,000 Construct a manufacturing assembly, wet processing bay and bonded storage facility. - • 45 9A Table One continued Projects Total Costs TIF Local Source Funds Aiprak Boulevard Extension $ 179,000 $ • 17,900 • Extend roads and all utilities Including, but not limited . to, water main, sanitary sewer line, underground three-phase electric, telephone service and drainage swales along the entire length of road extension. industrial Site Improvements $ 480,250 $ 48,025 Fill, grade and install primary drainage system on various airside and landside sites for future Development. $ 8,885,750 $2,202,925 Motor-sports Racing Complex infrastructure Master plan project and construct restrooms, showers, campground facilities and spectator parking. . • • • 46 9A Section 4.11 • • Valgatiori The current tax base of the lmmokalee area, is based on tax assessment data from the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office is provided on the table below. The tax increment projections proposed are based a conservative three percent increase in taxable property values for the years 2000-2010. The three-percent is based on general historic and economic observations in the community. TAX DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS IMMOKALEE FROZEN COUNTY-WIDE Annual Cumulative YEAR TAXABLE VALUE TAX BASE INCREMENT MILLAGE Tax Increment Tax Increment 1999 $148,127,153 $148,127,153 $0 4.0261 $0 $0 2000 $152,980,141 $148,127,153 $4,455,732 4.0261 $16,997 $16,997 2001 $157,569,546 $148,127,153 $9,045,137 4.0261 $34,503 ' $51,500 • 2002 $162,296,632 $148,127,153 $13,772,223 4.0261 $52535 $104,035 2003 $167,165,531 $148,127,153 $18,641,122 4.0261 $71,108 $175,143 2004 $172,180,497 $148,127,153 $23,656,088 4.0261 ' . $90,238 $266,381 2005 $177,345,912 $148,127,153 $28,821,503 4.0261 $109,941 $375,322 2006 $182,666,2897$148,127,153 $34,141,880 4.0261 $130,236 $505,559 2007 $188,146,278 $148,127,153 $39,621,869 4.0261 $151,140-. $656,699 2008 $193,790,666 $148,127,153 $45,266,257 4.0261 $172,671 $829,370 2009 $199,604,386 $148,127,153 $51,079,977 4.0261 $194,848 $1,024,218 2010 $205,592,518 $148,127,153 $57,068,1091 4.0261 $217,690 $1,241,908 Scenario Assumptions of Immokalee CRA: 1. Frozen Tax Base—Assumes the Community Redevelopment Plan is adopted in June 2000. 2. The County-wide Millage Rate is based on FY99/00 Genera Revenue Rate of 3.5058 and the Unincorporated Rate of.5203. 3. A 3%Annual Growth Rate is applied to years 2001-2010. 4. Annual Tax Increment is 95% of Total Tax Revenue. • • • 47 • V, 9A #3e011,4402 Creativity in Bloom SECTION 5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan First Amendment March 2019 111 jilll t . c , i4/ / ;.- !‘'4':-*: } 4 77 la �`r q v,4 �: !{ .y . k STOP . t _ K �` f _gip _ 411/ 1 Pte. • • . . . . rl' ,` - yf.. 2. r • . . . • . . . • . . �� lindale . . , .. ...,... ..., ,,. . ,, ,...___ / . --zip„, .., :_____ ... '' a Oliver design 411 „ • 1110 Prepared for Prepared by Tindale }<OIiver design w h March 2019 Cover Photo Sources:Zyscovich Architects; Google.com-Marys Palacios 9A K TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 ' - 5.0 Executive Summary 5-E-1 5.0.1 Executive Summary 5-E-1 5.0.2 Goals 5-E-1 5.0.3 Conceptual Plan Diagram 5-E-4 5.0.4 Character Areas 5-E-7 5.0.5 Focus of Redevelopment 5-E-9 5.0.6 Funding,Projects& Initiatives 5-E-10 5.0.7 2000&2019 Plan Comparison 5-E-14 5.1 Introduction 5-1-1 5.1.1 Vision 5-1-1 5.1.2 Process 5-1-1 5.1.3 Plan Organization 5-1-1 ° ' ' °a 5.2 Background 5-2-1 5.2.1 Creation of a CRA Area 5-2-1 w 4 p 7'7; 5.2.2 2000 Redevelopment Plan Goals and Projects 5-2-1 5.2.3 Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA 2018 Perspective 5-2-9 . i„„,ii" 5.3 Planning Framework&Elements 5-3-1 5.3.1 Conceptual Plan Diagram 5-3-2 el �: 5.3.2 Land Use&Urban Design 5-3-7 5.3.3 Public Space,Parks,&Open Space 5-3-26 5.3.4 Development 5-3-31 5.3.5 Transportation,Connectivity,&Walkability 5-3-42 5.3.6 Infrastructure 5-3-59 5.3.7 Process 5-3-66 5.3.8 Character Areas 5-3-67 4 44 5.4 Prioritization Plan 5-4-1 5.4.1 Prioritization of Projects&Initiatives 5-4-1 V ;• .i. r. ._ , ,, ... , -* 5.4.2 Financing Planning 5-4-1 5.4.3 Projects&Initiatives Prioritization 5-4-5 if --i_ ' ' -_ 5.4.4 Coordination&Partnerships 5-4-17 - ' 5.5 General Requirements 5-5-1 5.5.1 Overview of Relevant Statutes 5-5-1 5.5.2 Consistency with the County's Comprehensive Plan 5-5-1 .,s ` 5.5.3 Acquisition, Demolition/Clearance,&Improvement 5-5-1 5.5.4 Zoning&Comprehensive Plan Changes 5-5-1 .. ..„-,,til*,-;':::..c.,,,,---- 5.5.5 Land Use, Densities,&Building Requirements 5-5-1 5.5.6 Neighborhood Impact 5-5-5 5.5.7 Safeguards,Controls, Restrictions,&Assurances 5-5-5 ' .,,. 5.6 Tax Increment&MSTU Estimates 5-6-1 5.6.1 Tax Increment Financing 5-6-1 5.6.2 Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTUs) 5-6-2 5.6.3 Underlying Assumptions 5-6-12 . ,vfl 9A g?' 3 _ bn This page is intentionally left blank. �o- yrg ii Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 • . .,...._,,, , -EXECUTIVE SUMMARY � ,. .. , . , .., , , u,..„,,,„, ii , . ___ _. ____ _ _ , • , � ^ ....',,,',--,,..,_-' ....„._ , . „.._'''.": --''''',...,,',.._ ,...,.. 1 , ,..,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,.„0„ , : .. , . .„,„:„.,,.,,.... , „ ,, .,...,,,_„,,,,, . ..... ..;,,,„,......„.„„,,_., : ro + I ' 11____ ,, . , , ,, ..,., ,,, ., . , . v 3 s s � ___ .._ , ., . ..„.... ... . ...... _ .. , . . . ..... _____ . . _ ,,,,.,. ., „.._ig.- r_,,-----„--.--_;,,:,_ _ - ...„, .. , i: 1711.r• ,..,,_. ';',',..,,,, .,,,,, l 6 - 9 \'' ,.. ..-' . ,.- . at *s s -t .. , ....„:A f,.. •,,'-.i'';-.. . L � SJw t '. .. ` T 9A 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 -- 5.0.1 Executive Summary 5.0.2 Goals The Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area The main goals of the Plan include: Plan amendment provides an updated vision and Land Use & Urban Design approach for the redevelopment of this component area (see Map 5-ES-1)for the next 30 years. Promote a defined, harmonious, and urban visual and land use character tailored to the CRA area, cultivating The Plan brings together information gathered from its unique artistic and cultural identity. technical analysis,fieldwork observation, and public and agency outreach (documented in further detail in Public Space, Parks, & Open Space a separate Assessment Memo). From these efforts and Ensure accessible, activated, and well-maintained the resulting themes identified, an overarching vision public spaces, parks, and open space. emerged for the future of the Community Redevelopment Agency(CRA) and this component Development area: Foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability and prosperity for community members. t�. Promote quality of life and economic vitality with a Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability $a mixed-income, urban, Ensure safety, comfort, and convenience for various multi-modal community that welcomes visitors, methods of transportation within and connecting with the CRA area. cultivates the area's artistic and cultural identity, uplifts unique local destinations,and finds balance Infrastructure 4 with the natural environment. Provide effective infrastructure that preserves environmental and neighborhood design quality • through coordinated improvement planning and funding. The Redevelopment Area Plan lays out a framework of goals, objectives, and strategies organized thematically Process in support of this overall vision, along with a list of Carry out CRA area planning and implementation projects to carry out the framework.This plan is meant efforts to engage and serve the various communities to provide a palette of options, generated by the within the CRA area. technical analysis,fieldwork observations, and public and agency outreach,that the CRA can further explore. Consequently, not all of these suggestions will Figure 5-ES-1 provides a Concept Diagram focused on necessarily be carried through to full implementation. location-specific capital improvement projects, Full implementation of approaches and projects will be followed by a list of non-location-specific capital based on further study of capacity, technical improvements projects and a description of non- capitalprojects(e.g., plans, studies, grantprograms). °' feasibility, and public priorities. 5-E-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 Map 5-ES-1:Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Study Area 4 NA ,„ ,..!.-A„DAV IS BLVD ._ ,'.., �. — , KIRKWOOD AVE 1 LW WOOD AVE Z '---- r to 1 .. _ 1 ,92/ p O aig i qj - Q cc iu 1 : . ... v • ,). yr ' ti Aw . _ Sugden �. Regional ..° Park r City,of 7 r vlrt " Napless THOMASSON DR KAREN DR I - Napies East Naples Conemunity ' Botanical vlu ,j Pari (: - Garden 4 :c Bayview ' - 0 CRA Boundary i"-„,::::4,,,,..-...1..:.Y.--.' z'. i -. II Collier County Government Center a�4�r. '`' ANDREWS AVE ii,.,:.:;: ` . i i& �__•--- City of Naples within CRA ytu Ido vlu s31t[ 'alt- . . a Park r x&:; ;� 1� , ..•._' o ..,. �.. itLcw _4. Wetlands . __ _ v) ' ' _j City of Naples alu Jr == ,_ sc , �allr --414 --, -r. :: »lu f- ..altr slld oib _ ., #. ylt n{ y3rr .. 4y Q a4 la' as` Jl '. _. �.. _: r ;.fr-...7_,:..,3:. .... illintiNalESI r ,'u mkt °..: r. :.�,...a;Sv r ! Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-E-2 it 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 This page is intentionally left blank. :,... 3 { 4 I 'a 1 J i pp 3 5-E-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 ■rei a.......�,...e..,,.,..: ..,,. ,..,.».,...,,.«..,.,..,«...,.... >......,.-,<... ...m..,w..,..o- ,......m,.r.n:a. ,u,._- :.......,,�, ....,.��sw,w._w:..:aswr.uw.c,..,,,c.,x. ...x +<Ks..x. w,.,x.i..,>.0 aroe.avm<**A**Z.rr smus.'.ay..am .44W.�4**y.s,6. .riG;n.SO,%a4x.A'\4M*t#b'-'3urv#'ad�.�ATt#4"-R9,64aa"n .:.'L 4*t'd•i"�84 . re, ' ". P Q 0 v (D •o to CO■ • m -, O -5 rt ' c•D O v N •^ 0 m 7 ° O n E r* CD — ro Q° in 0 n --I v, 0.. .� . (DD • S20 -co •n c -0 C FY, ei.. rD Iv N N Q., vQOro 7 v, O r-F 22Q L-7. � z cnrt61. D o- N 7'-' Ot0 -o O 0 f+ IMMO. n Q_ 0". Q 0' DJ -0 '0 o" (D ' FO O = 47' -t v N -0 --2 (D `<i, rt rr 7 7 v Do a .,.., C 1tiii. „ _._______ . T.:. , , ..,„ . _______.,„,,, , c.,.., q rs „:,. , 4.. . ,,......1 ,:„: , no iz, _, ,,, ..?„,.,. .... A. , - F,s.- .., .1 DABLV l 44 .A �O , a . ' I I a° ..V,n I . . I.. g 41r4' . , `'�' : ;,` 1 ''' '/1--- ;-f: z ihb a _, e k Pt: ' loisoil ''' N, di!: , ' rrf, o i 1 l • < '7 --.r--.- or..... _v0 3 0I r cri LA713 1 ,-- 4 t ; 1 \ 1 I ! \-- .\\N \\\ X\ W40 z. o - — : aJ 11 \• •fl NOV 1 07,. j cz, , i„ , ..........:*„.. ...: ,z,44,,,,f, ,,c,,, ,,,„-. , „s„ = { _. 1 , 5 :......:. , ,,.. ..., 6_ .\ •\ \ \ , ,:, 01„,. ..\\N\.,,,-:\;,\\ 1 —ri / ; :::: .- o o a \ . �� __\\' ,,\_. Ca I 1�_1.._� cx4 a) Q ,44. . ,_ ` cv`\"•(- -, \\\\\ kO& i 's TT-NAVE ' I � o� ��'s \s4 s Cip \ Cri / 1 ,\ \ . a \ ra ! 1 ll : ,r, rD 1 , .` a ' \-\„ \ i _ � • 1'V `: co .... \ cc\1li '/�\. ?l - Sugden o AR\B� khk• :. ` Regional r, o � - ` D Park t co ! �� mowswilw * , . \ N \ , :--, 13 \--, kil ‘ I ti' E. ' 11 .._,:, _ .... 6-) 1 0 .,:f ,. ,-) . ,i..c s . ' o o • �V• • '. m THOMASSON DR (rD _I-11 1._� ' O • 7E1 . \\NO”' ik • ■ • .,,.. yak 1 -I�„ \ �Ni East Naples.:_:•. ••.__ D ti a \ \ Nii \ \KAREN'DR a Community ',(,f a.. �� f : _. Naples . \ _ - ■ '. Alez '.41 �_ l 1 •' 7 r _ • .,••\;Ga dem '' 0.1 1T1 ,' 0 al 1 iiii = Ba v ew r CI , . \. :_ , ._..•,-..._. ,. rata c) 71 o Y C31 - .::::..1 --h of v 4 1. ,.. C .�\-, vi. , ;r-dr _ I, p- on P \ • * • yi ' s. � �df'1 N N (<p n. Q —4 chi 4' Ell ED21111MC613 -:: '. wit _ ''..,_ - tk... r1 1 m . m o n k m c c a�„.. \\\NANk. �J - Ort° a o Al W 'fIL:'. •. ..._ tilt! ; --t 0 Q- =� � ya � n o � ab ,'.• '._ Atte. I 1�ft (D � � CD OOg m �,31ir f: nc tilt =-, -. .. ,.,.ems 'S O m a) m - -4114‘. _=_.: a) Ul S 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY n 14 This page is intentionally left blank. 5-E-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 f 5.0EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E 9A Location-Specific Capital Projects Land Use&Urban Design Projects 0 Gateway Intersection Design A. Davis Blvd/Airport Pulling Rd Improvements B. Davis Blvd/Shadowlawn Dr C. Davis Blvd/US 41 D. US 41/Bayshore Dr E. Thomasson Dr/Dominion Dr F. Us 41/Osceola Ave Development 0 Development Projects A. Development of Multi-Purpose Facility/Structure Public Space,Parks,&Open Space Projects 0 Parks improvements A. Triangle Retention Pond Improvements Transportation, Connectivity,&Walkability Projects 4 Complete Streets(Major) A. Linwood Ave—Phase I B. Shadowlawn Ave C. Bayshore Dr—Us 41/Thomasson Dr D. Thomasson Dr/Hamilton Ave E. Commercial Dr F. Kirkwood Ave/Kirkwood Ave Connection G. Pine St Connection GOComplete Streets&Trails A. Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail (Neighborhood) B. Jeepers Dr C. Linwood Ave—Phase II D. Republic Dr E. Danford St F. Bay St G. Bayshore Dr—Thomasson Dr/Holly Ave 6 Parking A. Surface/garage parking—Mini Triangle area U B. Surface/garage parking—Bayshore area C. Car/boat parking—Bayview Park area © General Road Engineering A. Pine Tree Dr Standard Improvements B. Andrews Ave C. Woodside Ave D. Holly Ave E. Palmetto Ct �ructure'Pro`s`' Infrastructure A. Underground/Relocate Overhead Utility Lines—Linwood Ave and Commercial Dr B. Underground/Relocate Overhead Utility Lines—Bayshore Dr 5-E-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —Draft March 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 Non-Location Specific Capital Projects Project Type Project Name Public Space,Parks,&Open Space A. Pocket Park Land Acquisition&Development B. General Parks Improvements f C. Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements Development p A. Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust Transportation,Connectivity,& A. Sidewalk Gap Improvements Walkability B. Bicycle Infrastructure C. Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements D. General Multi-Modal Improvements Infrastructure A. Water Main and Fire Suppression Upgrades B. Stormwater Improvements C. Upgrade Sanitary Sewer Lines Non-Capital Projects • General market study/economic profile Projects and initiatives that are not capital • Bayshore Drive Complete Street technical investments include a variety of plans, studies, and feasibility grant programs in support of redevelopment or capital • Bayshore Drive Complete Streets pilot project project planning throughout the CRA area.These non `- capital projects and initiatives include: • Triangle retention pond improvements CRA operating expenditures and administrative • Micro enterprise and arts incubator updates • CRA boundary expansion yt Land Development Code updates Grants and funding programs, including: Development support for catalyst development sites • Residential improvements grants/loans Master planning for: • Commercial façade improvements • Stormwater improvements • Wall and fence funding for areas with incompatible uses • Arts and culture-oriented development and redevelopment efforts • Public art funding • Implementation of Complete Streets projects • Economic development incentives • Community safety and clean-up • Mobile home replacements • Branding • Community Land Trust housing construction • Marketing and communications • Other affordable/workforce housing investments • Water and fire infrastructure improvements Other non-capital expenditures that may arise in the Feasibility studies, including: future and are not yet identified Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-E-6 5.8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 A 5.0.4 Character Areas The Redevelopment Area Plan framework can be tailored to different sub-areas depending on their specific character, needs, and opportunities. Map 5-ES-2 lays out these different sub-areas, or"Character Areas" with accompanying descriptions. fillMini Triangle/Davis Shadowlawn z.� • The Mini Triangle, including CRA-owned • Primarily a residential neighborhood with mix parcel, is a major commercial redevelopment of apartments/duplexes and single-family opportunity and Focus Development Node homes around Shadowlawn Elementary • Corridor commercial along Davis • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Y�. • Linwood Avenue another potential area for Intersection (asterisk),a gateway between redevelopment. north and south sections of CRA area Airport Pulling 4 amiami • Mix of corridor commercial, larger big-box • Corridor commercial and residences, style retail, and County Center including two major malls, Gulfgate Plaza and s` • Part of area currently designated as an Courthouse Shadows) Activity Center in Future Land Use Map • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area 6 Windstar North Bayshore x.. • Residential is primarily condos and single- • Focus Corridor along Bayshore Drive with family homes in gated communities neighborhood commercial (including Haldeman Creek Entertainment Center near • Includes golf course designated as a commercial use Creek) • Mix of multi-and single-family residential • Focus Intersection at Bayshore/Thomasson with planned roundabout South Bayshore • CRA-owned Focus Development Node(17- ' • Primarily single-family residential Acre Site) neighborhood with Naples Botanical Garden • Wetland considerations for development • ■ ■ ■ Focus Corridor . W: Focus Development Node/Intersection 5-E-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 ,..._ Map 5-ES-2:Character Areas 1 g g ......., A N - -- -- `"""''''- CO:g BLVD , f: •KVVOOD girAg a - 1 LINWOOD AVE • – rg ' tt ‘, , .,, ,... . ..4, 2 i. - .....i. 4,-..4 _k14 * .... ......... _ ,i I . soki_ ,..../ . 3.• i 1 - .. 1 ,,, i -- , 1 r ss‘ , T 4 ,J., - - * .. . ;...,, , -- BAR''" Gtil '----7-7.---- ‘ ', 6 i .....- ,.., _ - . ' f cr Sz b .• - - , . 4,,,--• .4:: Qc5) 6 - Park t,-----, mes'•Cr'C -'...'.7:7• S , THOMASS(* -_ _ , > p.iltpi,,,i:. KAREN ....: -• - -. '.-J. `-. '.-7:.-1._ ' '- Ci.:i-Jiirlit'IlfrV;-7-::---'--:7'...•-,--7: w '-‘:.,,:-.7-9'.'4 a , Botanical 1 - Garden , ii,.; . lik.:7::*11#•:'7.-i:2744/:::::::•:tif:iii--ii.N.4iff•• dpiii. - ;ii: •"";•--'4k 41-...1 .::-,.'s*.. .'-'1.!;-:*-.......-.::-:;.' i . . . B a 4V ieW , '.‘:f..-f"4.g--14-:.:44•-••••• .-- "" ' ... 7, . ANDREWS AV ::....:-.4t 0 CRA Boundary -:-"-iike:".E7i:-.111(:. * •: •.:',..,ii El Park ,,. - i-:. _.:- . ....":!.;,-' '`-'il Wetlands T ; --:-4- [• 1 City of Naples .., -- ...' ....._..._.. 7.-2.:•:-::- .--- : !, -N*e. 1-••••::-::'44(5'...::_.:-.I. ..*;7:. :-4.e.-.:=...4, . . . Cii,:..tk..74.....:: *...it.:•Nsk,,.......-*.`k...N.1: ke:-1!-•.-44'.;17,::::0............ .....,,,.--',;; ;;:sl:tkfrr-, i, A.',.fi''''rf--•-.'Nyiii-Ilif...'.-.4 '="''' .;1: ::.t":'."."- .,-:::,: 4(4 .::',-.;.-.--:L..'....,!* 1-.. ',i'.t•.:-::2'.-..4::,:LT . '-....:.---..:!--=....;...-- & ___ ,., '''"' _-....-.'Z-,-';;;*.e....7.•_:.-:.14:.;,,,nke 5-E-8 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5.0 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9A • Infill development on vacant residential lots ,k, 5.0.5 Focus of Redevelopment f • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets The following provides a focus of redevelopment for each Character Area based on the specific • Complete Street improvements along Shadowlawn Drive characteristics described in Map 5-ES-2 and the most relevant redevelopment strategies. 3. Airport Pulling 1. Mini Triangle/Davis • Transitions between residential neighborhoods and commercial development • Urban-style mixed use commercial • Eventual street enhancements, particularly redevelopment, including capitalization on the p y ' Mini Triangle as a catalyst development site and connectivity across Airport Pulling Rd urban-style parking solutions • Commercial facade improvements • Park development at retention pond site 4. Tamiami �;' • Complete Streets design and commercial • Connectivity to Downtown Naples via US 41 redevelopment along Linwood Ave and other ;; • Redevelopment of Courthouse Shadows nearby commercial roadways; pedestrian scale #:` street design between Mini Triangle, Linwood • Tenant opportunity and site improvements for Ave,and the proposed retention pond park walkable design at Gulfgate Plaza • Improved access to Mini Triangle development 5. Windstar .•.- from US 41, Davis Blvd,and Linwood Ave • Complete Streets and MSTU improvements along • Multi-modal connectivity: major community roadways, including Bayshore Drive,Thomasson Drive, and Hamilton Avenue • Across Davis Blvd 3 • Between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, • Access to Bayview Park 1 proposed retention pond park, and 6. North Bayshore eastern Triangle neighborhood • Corridor commercial development along Bayshore • To Downtown Naples potentially via Davis Drive, including Haldeman Creek Entertainment Blvd, US 41, and Gordon River Bridge Center near Creek and creative parking solutions improvements • Larger redevelopment opportunities of 17-Acre • Additional infrastructure improvements: sanitary Site and Del's 24 property sewers, electrical, stormwater • Arts and culture-oriented development 2. Shadowlawn • Transitional elements between corridor • Residential structural enhancement and upgrades commercial and residential areas along Bayshore • Avoidance of incompatible uses Drive and Thomasson Drive Development of vacant residential lots Transitional elements between different uses 5-E-9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9Af EXECUTIVE SUMMARY -5.0 `-- • Complete Street design along Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive, including Bayshore Drive/ 5.0.6 Funding, Projects, & Thomasson Drive roundabout Initiatives • Neighborhood Complete Streets and trails The Redevelopment Area Plan also provides a • Connections between Sugden Regional Park and comprehensive list of capital projects and non-capital CRA area initiatives in support of the vision with a prioritization • Water main and fire suppression upgrades plan and recommendation for allocated funding . • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets Table 5-ES-1 summarizes projected revenues for various funding sources operating in the CRA area, 7. South Bayshore including Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTUs)that • Mobile home and single-family home residential are funding sources independent of Tax Increment improvements, upgrades, affordability Finance (TIF). • Development of vacant residential lots This Plan does not obligate any funding to any projects listed.This Plan provides a guide and list of both • Access to Bayview Park f" capital and non-capital projects that tax increment • Connections between CRA and uses to the east, revenues can fund if approved by the CRA and including East Naples Community Park allocated through the standard operating and • Wetland,flooding, and site preparation procurement guidelines adopted by the Collier County considerations for development Board of Commissioners.The Plan sets a framework based on current conditions but also allows for • Roadway improvements to meet County flexibility in the phasing of projects based on funding engineering standards opportunities and community priorities identified in • Neighborhood Complete Streets annual work plans and capital improvement project lists. Figures 5-ES-2 through 5-ES-4 summarize the funding breakdown by timeframe and type of project/ initiative. Note that non-capital projects include studies, plans, and grant programs.Table 5-ES-2 provides an overall summary of TIF revenues and costs with surpluses and shortfalls noted for each time period (note that some projects are programmed at a deficit because other funding partners or sources are anticipated).Table 5-ES-3 shows CRA project costs that may also be eligible for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds, indicating the potential benefit from MSTU coordination. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-E-10 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 A Table 5-ES-1:Revenue Projection Summary Short Term Total Mid Term Total Long Term Total Fund Revenue Total (1-5 Yrs) (6-15 Yrs) (16-30 Yrs) Tax Increment (TIF) $10,831,197 $39,256,457 $104,330,124 $154,417,778 Bayshore Beautification MSTU $7,403,290 $20,956,845 $48,857,829 $77,217,964 Haldeman Creek MSTU $644,865 $1,831,442 $4,277,648 $6,753,955 Total $18,879,352 $62,044,744 $157,465,601 $238,389,697 5-E-11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMAR9 A I 5.0 Figure 5-ES-2:Short-term costs by project type Public Space, Parks, &Open Space, Land Use& Urban Design, $120,000, 1% $1,050,000, 4% P Development, $1,000,000, 4% i Non-Capital, Transportation, $12,315,280 ,49% Connectivity,& Walkability, $7,010,896, 28% Total Short-Term Costs(1-5 Years): Infrastructure, $25.0 million $3,525,695, 14% - Figure 5-ES-3:Mid-term project costs by type Public Space, Parks, &Open Land Use& Urban Space,$1,233,855, 2% Design, $86,250, 0%._ Development, $3,250,000, 6% Non-Capital, $21,449,912 , 37% Transportation, Connectivity,& Walkability, $25,279,039, 44% Total Mid-Term Costs(6-15 Years): Infrastructure, $57.9 million $6,634,549, 11% Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-E-12 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9A Figure 5-ES-4:Long-term costs by project type Public Space, Parks, &Open Land Use& Urban Space,$1,851,909, 2% Design, $0, 0% Development,$0, 0% if Transportation, Connectivity,& Walkability, $20,913,286, 28% Non-Capital, $36,150,171 ,49% 1 Infrastructure, Total Long-Term Costs(16-30 Years): $15,569,356, 21% $74.5 million Table 5-ES-2:Summary of CRA Project Costs and Projected TIF Revenues TIF Funding Summary Total Overall Short-Term Mid-Term Long Term (1-5 Years) (6-15 Years)1 (16-30 Years)2 Total Capital Costs-North of US 41(Triangle) $42,665,594 $4,916,110 $11,505,545 $26,243,939 Total Capital Costs-South of US 41(Bayshore) $44,859,243 $7,790,481 $24,978,149 $12,090,612 Total Capital Costs $87,524,836 $12,706,591 $36,483,694 $38,334,552 Total Non-Capital Costs $69,915,363 $12,315,280 $21,449,912 $36,150,171 Total TIF Revenue $154,417,778 $10,831,197 $39,256,457 $104,330,124 Difference -$3,022,421 -$14,190,674 -$18,677,149 $29,845,401 Overall period costs increased by 15%to account for annual increases 2 Overall period costs increased by 30%to account for annual increases Table 5-ES-3:Summary of MSTU-Eligible Costs and Projected MSTU Revenues MSTU Funding Summary Total Overall Short-Term Mid-Term 1 Long Term 2 (1-5 Years) (6-15 Years) (16-30 Years) Total Capital Costs-MSTU-Eligible Projects $13,973,502 $4,121,297 $5,321,297 $4,530,908 Total Right-of-Way MSTU Revenue $77,217,964 $7,403,290 $20,956,845 $48,857,829 Difference $63,244,462 $3,281,993 $15,635,548 $44,326,921 Overall period costs increased by 15%to account for annual increases 2 Overall period costs increased by 30%to account for annual increases Note:Projects are considered MSTU-eligible based on those that align with accepted uses of Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds according to Ordinance No.2013-68 5-E-13 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMAF9. A T..5.0 5.0.7 2000 & 2019 Plan Comparison Table 5-ES-4 assists in comparing the 2000 Plan to the amended Redevelopment Area Plan, showing a status update for the various areas and initiatives identified for Tax Increment Finance(TIF)funding in the 2000 Plan, as well as how the Redevelopment Area Plan update responds to the identified initiatives. Note that two additional redevelopment sites, Naples Plaza and Naples Steel, were identified for private redevelopment without TIF assistance (now Naples Bay Club/Cottages at Naples Bay Resort and Woodspring Suites, respectively). While the 2000 Plan has a strong orientation around these sites and initiatives,the updated Redevelopment Area Plan is oriented around general themes of: Land Use and Urban Design; Public Space, Parks, &Open Space; Development;Transportation, Connectivity, &Walkability; Infrastructure;and Process.As a result, the amended4. Redevelopment Plan contains additional considerations that may not stem directly from the 2000 Plan, including but not limited to: a. • A focus on the CRA-owned 17-Acre Site west of Sugden Regional Park for catalyst redevelopment • A focus on arts and culture in the CRA area redevelopment vision • Connections to nearby parks • Land use transitions between incompatible uses and densities/intensities • More comprehensive infrastructure improvements Table 5-ES-4:Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan 2000 Plan Projects Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Catalyst Redevelopment Projects Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and `. larger Triangle area with associated improvements (primarily roadway,infrastructure,and land use Triangle-Hotel/ Parcel at apex currently vacant;CRA-owned transitions)and incentives identified that are generally Restaurant/ property under contract for sale and supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan(see Office received PUD zoning for Mixed-Use project. Sections 5.3.2,5.3.4,5.3.5,and 5.3.6);general development support is also funded in the non-capital projects(see Section 5.4) Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements (primarily roadway, infrastructure,and land use Triangle—Flex Current mix of commercial and industrial transitions)and incentives identified that are generally Office/ uses. supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan(see Warehouse Sections 5.3.2,5.3.4,5.3.5,and 5.3.6);general development support is also funded in the non-capital projects(see Section 5.4) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-E-14 b 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 A Table 5-ES-4(continued):Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan 2000 Plan Projects Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Catalyst Redevelopment Projects(Continued) Identified as an opportunity for new tenancy in Gulfgate Plaza currently has tenants;consideration second floor space and to incentivize optimal Town Center needs to be given to type of establishments tenant mix and walkable design;Courthouse J desired for this space.A small business incubator (Gulfgate Plaza) Shadows is another large commercial space might be a good use for vacant office on second providing a redevelopment opportunity(Section floor. 5.3.4) Three60 Market has been established west of Recommendations made to evaluate LDC Entertainment bridge and south of creek;food truck park changes to facilitate commercial development Center recently opened on north side of creek under such as that in the Bayshore area (Section (Haldeman same ownership as Three60 Market. Need for 5.3.4);commercial parking solutions explored Creek) commercial parking has emerged as an issue in this area. (Section 5.3.5,Section 5.4) Neighborhood Focus Initiatives CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood Focus Initiatives. Neighborhood enhancement focused on structural upgrades, ... The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: • New general housing and affordable housing limiting uses incompatible with the • Rehabilitation of affordable housing redevelopment vision,transitions between _ • Neighborhood gateway features uses/intensities,infill development on vacant • Traffic calming by closing part of Linwood lots,addressing flooding/drainage,and • Extension of Pelton Ave to Linwood for complete streets/transportation improvements s, improved internal circulation that will address streetscape elements such as Shadowlawn lighting and traffic calming.These Current status: ": The Shadowlawn improvements delayed due to improvements will likely require strategic recession,warranting prioritization of current property acquisition and demolition of study and improvement implementation approach structures for redevelopment.Other relevant x` for area. However,some stormwater planning and initiatives include gateway design and improvements completed for area(see General a ;, coordination with County sheriff,code Infrastructure Improvements section below). enforcement,and housing agencies to address quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See section 5.3 for more information. ,A. C,t 5-E-15 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 A "='5.0 Table 5-ES-4:Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan 2000 Plan Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Projects Neighborhood Focus Initiatives(Continued) The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood • Landscaping and beautification along Focus Initiatives. Redevelopment focus for this Bayshore Drive neighborhood split into North and South.North focus: • New affordable housing commercial/catalyst site development,parking,arts • Rehabilitation of market-rate and and culture,transition between residential and affordable housing • Botanical Gardens relocation commercial, residential infill,comprehensive street • Design of new neighborhood park and improvements that will address elements such as connection to Sugden Park site streetlighting and traffic calming, park connections • Sabal Bay development(pending legal (Sugden Regional Park).South focus:residential QEF actions) upgrades and affordability,residential infill,park access Bayshore Current related efforts include: (East Naples Community Park, Bayview Park),wetlands/ • Beautification and roadway flooding considerations,roadway standards.These improvements planned for Hamilton Ave improvements will likely require strategic property and Thomasson Dr,funded by the acquisition and demolition of structures for Bayshore Beautification MSTU. redevelopment.Other relevant initiatives include • Additional stormwater planning and , additional street/transportation improvements to improvements completed for area (see General Infrastructure Improvements address elements such as lighting and traffic calming, section below). as well as coordination with County sheriff,code • Residential units have been built; enforcement,and housing agencies to address quality , substandard housing has been and supply of housing and streetlighting.See Section demolished. 5.3 for more information. Y" if $r. ti S Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-E-16 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 A -....- Table 5-E5-4(continued):Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan 'r 2000 Plan Projects Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response General Infrastructure Improvements Need for stormwater improvements identified jt for entire CRA area,so planning and improvement efforts have included both ,, Triangle and Bayshore neighborhoods, Triangle including the following: Stormwater • Stormwater plan created for Gateway Recommendation made to update stormwater , ; Management Triangle residential area in 2009 and for management plan for the entire CRA area (Section Plan Bayshore MSTU area in 2011. 5.3.6) • Karen Dr stormwater improvements completed in 2017. • Pineland Ave stormwater improvements completed. Last major dredging project was in 2006. Depth assessment will be conducted for creek, Haldeman and capital reserves currently being Recommendation made to coordinate the capital Creek and accumulated for future maintenance or improvements of the MSTUs,including that used to dredge efforts.Advisory Board voted to °' Canal System increase millage rate to create dredging plan maintain Haldeman Creek,in a Capital Improvements Dredging Plan when major dredge will be needed;the Plan(Section 5.3.7). millage increase to 1 mil was approved at the final budget hearing on September 20,2018. Roadway Improvements " US 41 Zoning Resurfacing and certain safety improvements Recommendation to coordinate on future Overlay and currently programmed in FDOT Transportation improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a Improvement Program. community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets Landscaping Pimprovements along this corridor(see Section 5.3.5). Davis Boulevard Resurfacing project beginning as part of FDOT Recommendation to coordinate on future Streetlighting Transportation Improvement Program improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets and Zoning projects. improvements along this corridor(see Section 5.3.5). Overlay • Roundabout will be put in at Bayshore Recommendation included to make Complete Streets and Thomasson as a Bayshore comprehensive roadway improvements along Bayshore Bayshore Drive Beautification MSTU project. Drive and evaluate opportunity to underground Landscaping • Bayshore Dr needs to be considered for „! streetscape and roadway updates via the overhead utilities(see Section 5.3.5,Section 5.3.6,and Bayshore Beautification MSTU. capital funding in Section 5.4). Other TIF-Funded Projects Botanical Gardens is now located southwest Specific planning tasks included for the 17-Acre Site of the Bayshore Drive/Thomasson Drive Botanical that highlight in particular connections to Sugden intersection.The CRA currently owns the Gardens Regional Park and a performance space(see Section 17.89-acre site("17-Acre Site")west of Support Sugden Regional Park;the site is targeted for 5.3.4 and capital and non capital improvements in catalyst development. Section 5.4). 5-E-17 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 ' A INTRODUCTION ,,,,,,,, , , ,_., ,.,,, , ,,,,.,. „, . .,..,......,„.,,,.:„,..„,„.c.,, ,„.... ..„,,,,,,„,.....,_...,,,,,:„:„z,,, ,,,,,,ii,,,,„,,,, , , _______-_ ___ „,,,,c....„..,„2, , ., _,,,, ,„„„„„„,_,,,, . ,„„ , , , „.,„_„„„„„,,,,...„,,„, , ,,,,„ _ . „„,,,,.„,,,,„„„..„„,„„,, r..1. ,,,,,,,,,,tta,_,._,,,,r,...,,,:,,,,_,..,,. ., , „, , ,,,,„:.„:,...... , , , , _:;, ...,„,........_,:„. ..,,:i..p.,..„2...:,;....:,:_„.„..„1„,,,,,„,,,,... ...„. . ,,.,,.,,,,,,„,. . .,,,,,,,...,,,„,,„.:,...:,.,„,_.„,_," Ott§ g, . zl I. .. L , . .,........,_, ,., _ ... ,,,,,,,,.‘,..„..4 , _ .., w .... _ . _., ,..._ .. ?, , ,:-. ',+ ji v. ..,,,s, ,: . ,..„:::::„ ... .._. i _____. „.._. , ,_,,,,... ,,,,,,, ,, , ,_ ... ' ...„,,,,,, . _ ,.. ..,,,„. _ . .., a _ i 3 z � t € '+ • r . R m a r411....-.1.`14-1 ` " ( <� v,., dF 3 5 • 1 ,. . , :. .. .„.....:,,, . .. 7 ate- �, ' r -,-,---._----_,_ -____----:-.,-..-4,.7.-.--cs�. 51 ; INTRODUCTION 9A k 5.1 .1 Vision 5.1 .2 Process The 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan provides an The technical analysis involved in the Redevelopment updated vision and approach for the redevelopment of Area Plan process included a review of the existing the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area in Collier plans related to the CRA area, as well as spatial and County(see Map 5-1-1).The Plan brings together quantitative analysis of data related to the CRA area. information gathered from technical analysis, The study team also conducted fieldwork to collect fieldwork observation, and public and agency outreach additional information and "ground-truth"findings in (documented in further detail in a separate the data.The public and agency outreach consisted of Assessment Memo). From these efforts and the stakeholder and agency meetings and calls,two public -. resulting themes identified, an overarching vision workshops, and a boat tour of Haldeman Creek and emerged for the future of the CRA area: adjacent canal areas. Figure 5-1-1 illustrates the complete planning process. Promote quality and economic vitality with a mixed-income, urban, ‘1,. .1 ...„1 Plan Organization multi-modal community that welcomes visitors, The remaining sections of this Plan cover the following topics: cultivates the area's artistic and cultural identity, uplifts unique local destinations, and finds balance Section 5.2: Background—historical overview of �-' 4 the CRA area, including the original 2000 CRA Plan with the natural environment. and status update , ' • Section 5.3: Plan Framework& Elements— „a ..6.'•"i'.01,4,.- .....0-4.1.-.-....•-•-4........sr*"'y,5-6-....-•ol,-•_i"1•"i. framework of goals, objectives, and strategies \I< related to redevelopment in the CRA area, with This vision provides the guidance for the overall . = supporting information on existing conditions, framework and projects laid out in this Redevelopment Area Plan for furthering the opportunities,and approaches for carrying out revitalization of the CRA area.This Plan is meant to I. strategies % ' provide apalette of options, generated bythe • Section 5.4: Prioritization Plan—information on �� p � technical analysis,fieldwork observations, and public revenues; capital project funding and phasing; and and agency outreach,that the CRA can further planning, administrative, and regulatory initiatives explore. Consequently, not all of these suggestions will �' Section 5.5:General Requirements—information necessarily be carried through to full implementation. on additional regulatory requirements for the CRA Full implementation of framework strategies and `` Plan and conclusion projects will be based on further study of capacity, • technical feasibility, and public priorities. • Section 5.6: Tax Increment& MSTU Estimates— provides methodology and underlying assumptions for tax increment and Municipal Wiz, Service Taxing Unit(MSTU) revenues. 5-1-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A INTRODUCTION , 5.1 ._ pi- ,_.-1 I ----7- --' -DAVIS-BLVD ...., -.. - -- ----, KIRK WOOD AVE cc 0 = Ir•- L1:WOODVE z — --, I - -9,4 < 2 ''i.t.-17.• I *44 '----- ' - '-'-'' ai 2.- = cc s::-......::::_;-, I ,,,,, „,..„-- 7„.....____„. •"b .i. . , . . . „ . X, • , i . - -'' 1 , . 1. , .. 1-. . ..1 -- ,. i s--_, • .. , ../ . , . . • , lAt,„:,..:,':•,:".1z-• • BARRETAVET , • ‘, s• •, I'iII.II,:---...',,:y.,.,„..tgI,I'I•fr'0,,,,,II.,:,,14,i-,4,,,,f_1,...4.,:.,- (c, N; I•--j ...,0 r.„......._....i..........-----, ,..„ ) -- 4 i --') ItT....7.,,, ...:,. : ( p cc 411.1%. .,,::::: , 0 ,., - - 0 iii , Sugden - • ,. /9" < Regional L- - .. , \ „ Park . . . . . _ . . -..•-..1'' co .. - . .,. --1 " I . 1 sv. er , -,,, , • - t ----------------- Citof --r-r L-11 II 4,,i,-: z_..,...'.:: 1..., -, • -- , Naples I THOMASSOON DK.— - -- ----- ,i,,,,,,,...,,•-,,,,.-- -%... ... "..-, 113• 1<„A REN DR ., Naples East Naples-1:l----•"4----------•------- / ' I"--•'---- '....., . ... , -•:•=_,, ,, i , ,:,,^-------, „ 3-4. , A Communit --,BOtanical ...,.Park -, ,.---....• - -,..,..-- -7.:,.--.;..... -- -•-••-,•-• ... 11••-',,"4"ail , 1 ._• J..1 --Gardp • •- -•••.• -^--,..,--,-- 4&,•••.-.7.•-">mg.-.::::::--1.44,:,,•:::::-...-*?,.,-„,--=_-_-4..?„.. 1' ...,..;-: 7-sk.--::ele.-71-1--,vgad...*-•,.* Bayview , - 1 -- • __.1 , -• --:- 1--• ;',,,k,„:-..,.......:-•.::::-.7.;..cii,...::•-•7.--c•,-7:,- :Site'• P2 rk I i 4.e. -..::-4..14.':.4.1 7:. 511: 9. '..-:::::. i ; C:1 CRA Boundary ... ..,, . - 1 .-.5.-.2*.fk.,.., - - 'I -,-- .'.."...N14.4•A!:-- .: __ : - .... kr'''- --- •'Alt,• ' * ; - :::::44 "'- .-- • • *4.-::- IIII Collier County Government Center _....i.F::.:".';1& :77- iff.. _:,• AN D REWSAVE :::-...i, , , • City of Naples wither CRA -va:•,-.: ..-..• . ,.._ ----, , *.i ,7.?"',??..'' * Ife-:: -.: *:- 7F"*ItA Y.,:4' . .... 44:;:-..:,', - Park ,'41.7;Jie,::::,;::--S.,.-1-.,- "74ff.'...".1.7 . ....: _ .T.., ::.,,i.,7 :..-C11q.•:-`.F.--*1'.f.-_-;_. 4."-",.*-.7:...7* 'fa,-44,."..,..14.-*ie. t Wetlands ''..1'..:.;.'-f".-'-::::"›.4.ie -. ... .::: :"..;..:;:f'4:'..L4,r: 1.1 City of Naples !,;','' .-'-';',.-.'. •'-'=;;:--1.;. ---_-.---.,„/,..-'-:::::: 7-•*:•-.••••44;-.,...,1---7-,.--;-1; •;..??-ri,t, ..4-:_..:::: 1,te;:...--.:.---..-,-...,---•i1:,*I? -7-'......„ *ff.••••-*• , ----•/:--• •-•--Pli'.--44?"---- - •• ' t-1; samei 1,- IMF- .-:.• _ -... - 1, ,.....7.: •Alf,..c:::.,,, ..,....-•-= 4,0--,.1! •. . • Mae - •r 1 , 11(.:* Map 5-1-1:Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Study Area / •\., Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Are Plan—Draft March 2019 / 5-1-2 5.1 INTRODUCTION 9 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Event No.of People 2 Public Workshops 80+ Feb-June 2018 5 Stakeholder 50+ Meetings Assessment Technical Analysis 4Agency Meetings 20 Fieldwork Public Outreach 6 Stakeholder 10 Fiscal Analysis&Capital Planning Interviews/Tours June-Sept 2018 Plan&Amendments Preparation Draft Updated CRA Plan t Draft Comprehensive Plan&Zoning Amendment Recommendations i ` F Community forum i Oct 2018-Jan 2019 ;;;;,* .t, Plan&Amendments Approval Updated CRA Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan&Zoning Amendment Recommendations Review Figure 5-1-1:Planning Process b,. 5-1-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9 <, , . BACKGROUND .. , , . . .. ... ., yx . • ... a , , S _ m. 0 , . .. . .. ,,, .. _ ,, ,. . ... . , .:c , , .. /....,. = X F * ` > 6 ' \ 4,-. r,.-, ! 4..... .... . .., .,. tir � ' i a s .V « !`- # u°p 0 f ` j '-. .74.: 1 .,„ ',,,„ /1-,:\,,,,,:. ....,. , _...- -' # - V - rel : ll + # s �' .,, _ - ,,,, , .' 4114 - '''A .. , ., _ , , , . ., . , . -, ,i, , .. , , :, 4 F 4. � f M t J , 5 • 2 , , ,. ,,,,,,, :::„.„,..„.„,_,.,..::::::.:2,.:42,_.,. _, .. , ,,_,,. ., . ,.. B. P BACKGROUND 9A 5 21 Creation of the CRA In addition to the Land Use Plan,the 2000 Plan provided an Urban Design Framework to illustrate the Area following: The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area is located 1. Primary areas anticipated to undergo significant primarily in unincorporated Collier County to the change via redevelopment or infill development, V17"I;;'' southeast of the cityof Naples(a small portion of the receive improvements via neighborhood :'f''-#41' area is in the city of Naples;see Map 5-1-1). It is near improvement strategies, or remain as stable and the popular destinations of Downtown Naples and planned development areas Q coastal beaches and is bisected by US 41, a major -A----\,,: regional thoroughfare.This corridor defines two major 2. Basic site design conditions recommended to ,, implement the vision defined in the public �, ; �., sub-areas within the larger CRA boundary--the ikiv �� outreach process Gateway Triangle community north of US 41 and the Bayshore community south of US 41 (see Map 5-1-1 3. Primary corridors and areas recommended for *, ,. for CRA area and Resolution 2000-82, Exhibit A at end landscape/streetscape improvements in support ' ': of this document for a legal description of the CRA of the vision defined in the public outreach ,tea- boundary). The primary areas anticipated to undergo significant N .` The CRA was created in 2000 under the jurisdiction of change included: 1 '' Collier County to facilitate the physical and economic • Triangle area approximately defined by US 41, revitalization and enhancement of the community. Its Davis Blvd, and a line based on the projected creation was based on documenting conditions of alignment of Pine St to the north of US 41 blight in a Finding of Necessity study, as required by Florida Statute 163.340.Table 5-2-1 provides an • Naples Plaza (southwest of Davis Blvd and US 41 f overview of the findings. intersection) and adjacent properties • Gulfgate Plaza as a Town Center • Commercial uses on Naples Steel properties kf@�� 4 5.2.2 2000 Plan Goals and (along US 41) and other properties on Gulfgate N • Residential uses south and west of Gulfgate Projects pM • Infill: 4The 2000 Plan laid out visual concept goals and • corresponding redevelopment projects to improve Multiand single-family residential in conditions in the CRA area.The projects were planned Shadowlawn neighborhood • Commercial uses for Haldeman Creek (,{ ` , out in phases over a 20-year time span. Map 5-2-1 wi shows the overall Land Use Plan illustrating generaltrt4Z:'pAiAW entertainment center wov land uses and significant activity centers.The Land Use • Mixed multi-family and commercial uses itait Plan suggested a basic regulatory framework that along Bayshore Drive north of Lake View .v would guide Future Land Use Map and zoning (Lakeview) Dr • Residential and commercial at Bay Center amendments to support the redevelopment of the e area (Bayshore and Thomasson) area. 5-2-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A BACKGROUND 5.2 Main Issue Sub-Issue Specific Locations Mentioned Inadequate street layout and • Shadowlawn Dr design (including sub-standard • Thomasson Dr street widths) • Most local streets • Davis Blvd • Airport Rd Commercial parking problems • Bayshore Rd • US 41 Predominance of defective or Lack of streetlights along major • Major arterials inadequate street layout • Most local streets arterial and most local streets ' ,; 1* • Davis Blvd • Shadowlawn Dr Lack of sidewalks • Bayshore Rd south of Thomasson Rd • Most local streets Lack of neighborhood connections • Residential neighborhoods • US 41 Commercial lots • Davis Blvd Faulty lot layout in relation to size, • Between Pine St and US 41 adequacy, accessibility,or Built density far below approved • RMF-6 residences in Gateway usefulness density Triangle area Not meeting lot standards in at • RMF-6 residential properties least one respect • Bayshore area residences Disproportionate lack of plumbing Unsanitary or unsafe conditions Disproportionate overcrowding 2 unsafe structures Lack of sidewalks and streetlights Poor drainage of local roads, z",w Deterioration of site or other surface water management improvements problems Lack of right-of-way for improvements along Shadowlawn Dr No public transportation provided Other problems in CRA area Housing affordability noted as an issue in the county and as an issue that could get worse in the CRA area Table 5-2-1:Findings of Blighted Conditions in CRA Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-2-2 5.2 BACKGROUND 9 A • Other opportunities in the Medium character) suppressed to design of sign's Intensity residential area of Land Use Plan background and surrounding landscape planting The public outreach of the 2000 Plan defined the • Pathways—representing sidewalk set back from establishment of a Neighborhood Focus Initiative as a curb by distance greater than width of walk and programmatic objective.The aim of such a program with planting materials and low pedestrian £< was "to coordinate the direction of a variety of public lighting provided between walk and curb and quasi-public services to enhance major residential • On Street Parking—representing street with portions of the project area."The primary narrow planted median and use of angle parking neighborhoods for improvements specified in the interspersed with planting areas on both sides of 2000 Plan included: street • Bayshore • Landscaping—representing street with • Shadowlawn landscaped median and landscaping and The primary areas for stability and planned decorative lighting fixtures on edges development with low-intensity residential included: • Public Spaces—representing pedestrian area with • Windstar palms and large pool with water jet fountain • Sabal Bay(Hamilton Bay) development In terms of landscape and streetscape improvements, the design framework focused on: Site design standards included: • Treatments for major roadways, including: • Roof patterns reflective of Old Florida • architectural style Davis Blvd • Placement of buildings close to street to support • Airport Pulling Rd pedestrian activity • US 41 • Use of rectilinear block pattern to strengthen • Bayshore Dr predominant established character of area • Thomasson Dr ; • Placement of parking to rear of development sites Significant gateway intersection designs at The following lays out items covered by the visual intersections of the above streets as well as: preference statement from the public outreach effort • Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis and North of US 41 of the 2000 Plan, which supported the design standards: • Linwood Ave at Airport Pulling Rd • Buildings—representing an "Old Florida" or • Pelton Ave north of US 41 "Cracker" style with covered porches, metal roof, • Intersection proposed at time of Sabal Bay's main and dormers east/west street with Bayshore Dr • Signage—representing low, monument-style sign with business logogram (representative sign or 5-2-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A BACKGROUND „ 5.2 —f`Y I , r-----1= i,........,„,,, 1 I; i ISL_ E3efiNzNaDis —.�. aen I EiSdi,VOSUWMCOrMil '. 2 M r C Neighborhood - -• 41 - 1 Co'Iier County C.ammirz:lnn Cour County Plenning . ith+dv r . ` ILLUSTRATION wk '` tf Flevelopment Plan 1s. �.'} Land Use: - I s "r"} NI ` ` Town Center/Node IL' l :151 - - r Det+elopment ji Naples [ , i I._ ActMty Centers Steel Site I - I i � Region& Maier Moda-ate ` ceits,entoninnwt s { c.,r. sIN - I saltt.n , Irill IIIV, III Town Center ce«tt z `ti{ Bayshore Commercial Neighborhood Ej Entertainment/ p': Avow Law Ps rwrmme^tel Ps* , .0 Mixed Use Ii w f Windstar •* r'`�-s,,i2 ;� OlT�ei Comma-de! 1 .-- _ - OMioe/Warehouse A4102.15&twat and Irk Pio* 11+r.rWlC-04--w ..... ' `'._.t.. _ MnckJm intensity f Laj Reeldentia r- - " ' .. : ) T ci Law Intenmrly 1 Kaeltstm2+yoMn� - • 1 Botanical Garden 1 . - llvebn Lake Perk _ 1:, Bayshore Neighborhood Il Government Orme ini".1 II Sabal Bay I V A sr��.ar ��'''' re.�.M.r r+.. } Map 5-2-1:Land Use Plan from 2000 CRA Plan Note:Additional labels have been added to clarify location of certain sites and neighborhoods. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-2-4 9A 5.2 BACKGROUND Table 5-2-2 provides a status update for the various areas and initiatives identified for Tax Increment Finance (TIF)funding in the 2000 Plan, as well as how the Redevelopment Area Plan update responds to the identified initiatives. Note that two additional redevelopment sites, Naples Plaza and Naples Steel,were identified for private redevelopment without TIF assistance (now Naples Bay Club/Cottages at Naples Bay Resort and Woodspring Suites, respectively). While the 2000 Plan has a strong orientation around these sites and initiatives, the updated Redevelopment Area Plan is oriented around general themes of: Land Use and Urban Design; Public Space, Parks, & Open Space; Development;Transportation, Connectivity, &Walkability; Infrastructure; and Process. As a result,the updated Redevelopment Plan contains additional considerations that may not stem directly from the 2000 Plan, including but not limited to: • A focus on the CRA-owned 17-Acre Site west of Sugden Regional Park for catalyst redevelopment • A focus on arts and culture in the CRA redevelopment vision • Connections to nearby parks • Land use transitions between incompatible uses and densities/intensities • More comprehensive infrastructure improvements 2000 Plan Projects Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Catalyst Redevelopment Projects Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements Triangle-Hotel/ Parcel at apex currently vacant;CRA-owned (primarily roadway,infrastructure,and land use Restaurant/ property under contract for sale and transitions)and incentives identified that are generally Office received PUD zoning for Mixed-Use project. supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan(see Sections 5.3.2,5.3.4,5.3.5,and 5.3.6);general development support is also funded in the non-capital projects(see Section 5.4) Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements Triangle—Flex (primarily roadway,infrastructure,and land use Office/ Current mix of commercial and industrial transitions)and incentives identified that are generally Warehouse uses. supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan(see Sections 5.3.2,5.3.4,5.3.5,and 5.3.6);general development support is also funded in the non-capital projects(see Section 5.4) Gulfgate Plaza currently has tenants; Identified as an opportunity for new tenancy in second consideration needs to be given to type of floor space and to incentivize optimal tenant mix and Town Center establishments desired for this space.A walkable design;Courthouse Shadows is another large (Gulfgate Plaza) small business incubator might be a good commercial space providing a redevelopment use for vacant office on second floor. opportunity(Section 5.3.4) Table 5-2-2:Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan 5-2-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 91 BACKGROUND "5.2 yr? 2000 Plan Projects Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Catalyst Redevelopment Projects(Continued) " Three60 Market has been established west of Recommendations made to evaluate LDC Entertainment bridge and south of creek;food truck park recently changes to facilitate commercial development Center opened on north side of creek under same ` such as that in the Bayshore area (Section (Haldeman ownership as Three60 Market. Need for 5.3.4);commercial parking solutions explored Creek) commercial parking has emerged as an issue in this area. (Section 5.3.5,Section 5.4) Neighborhood Focus Initiative ; CRA will generally aim to continue these The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: Neighborhood Focus Initiatives. Neighborhood • New general housing and affordable housing enhancement focused on structural upgrades, • Rehabilitation of affordable housing limiting uses incompatible with the • Neighborhood gateway features redevelopment vision,transitions between uses/intensities, infill development on vacant ,,, • Traffic calming by closing part of Linwood lots,addressing flooding/drainage,and • Extension of Pelton Ave to Linwood for complete streets/transportation improvements 1,.4 Shadowlawn improved internal circulation that will address streetscape elements such as lighting and traffic calming.These improvements will likely require strategic -` Current status: property acquisition and demolition of X' The Shadowlawn improvements delayed due to structures for redevelopment.Other relevant ,x_ recession,warranting prioritization of current initiatives include gateway design and study and improvement implementation approach coordination with County sheriff,code for area. However,some stormwater planning and enforcement,and housing agencies to address improvements completed for area (see General Infrastructure Improvements section below). quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See section 5.3 for more information. s' Table 5-2-2(continued):Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan ! (001111111111144N Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-2-6 5.2' BACKGROUND 9 A "' 2000 Plan Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Projects Neighborhood Focus Initiatives(Continued) The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: • Landscaping and beautification along CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood . Bayshore Drive Focus Initiatives. Redevelopment focus for this • New affordable housing neighborhood split into North and South. North focus: ` • Rehabilitation of market-rate and commercial/catalyst site development, parking,arts affordable housing and culture,transition between residential and • Botanical Gardens relocation commercial,residential infill,comprehensive street • Design of new neighborhood park and improvements that will address elements such as connection to Sugden Park site streetlighting and traffic calming, park connections • Sabal Bay development(pending legal (Sugden Regional Park).South focus:residential actions) upgrades and affordability, residential infill,park access Bayshore (East Naples Community Park,Bayview Park),wetlands/ flooding considerations, roadway standards.These Current related efforts include: improvements will likely require strategic property • Beautification and roadway improvements planned for Hamilton Ave acquisition and demolition of structures for and Thomasson Dr,funded by the redevelopment.Other relevant initiatives include ` Bayshore Beautification MSTU. additional street/transportation improvements to • Additional stormwater planning and address elements such as lighting and traffic calming, improvements completed for area(see as well as coordination with County sheriff,code e,-. General Infrastructure Improvements l p enforcement,and housing agencies to address quality � � section below). and supply of housing and streetlighting.See Section 014.0-j'., • Residential units have been built; i;#40-43 substandard housing has been 5.3 for more information. ' iv demolished. r< Table 5-2-2(continued):Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan , a ems : F.tet , 04-444A4 4 0;544 004 5.2_7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9Asr4 BACKGROUND ;A2 2000 Plan ` Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Projects General Infrastructure Improvements _. Need for stormwater improvements identified for entire CRA area,so planning and , improvement efforts have included both Triangle and Bayshore neighborhoods, Triangle including the following: Recommendation made to update stormwater .. Stormwater • Stormwater plan created for Gateway gym. Management Triangle residential area in 2009 and for management plan for the entire CRA area (Section Plan Bayshore MSTU area in 2011. 5.3.6) • Karen Dr stormwater improvements completed in 2017. • Pineland Ave stormwater improvements 3 completed. Last major dredging project was in 2006. Depth assessment will be conducted for Haldeman creek,and capital reserves currently being Recommendation made to coordinate the capital Creek and accumulated for future maintenance or improvements of the MSTUs,including that used to dredge efforts.Advisory Board voted to Canal System maintain Haldeman Creek,in a Capital Improvements increase millage rate to create dredging plan Dredging Plan when major dredge will be needed;the Plan(Section 5.3.7). -,:„, millage increase to 1 mil was approved at the final budget hearing on September 20,2018. I Roadway Improvements 4`` Recommendation to coordinate on future US 41 Zoning Resurfacing and certain safety improvements 7; Overlay and currently programmed in FDOT improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets Landscaping Transportation Improvement Program. improvements along this corridor(see Section 5.3.5). .. Davis Recommendation to coordinate on future Boulevard Resurfacing project beginning as part of FDOT improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a h.. Streetlighting Transportation Improvement Program community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets and Zoning projects. improvements along this corridor(see Section 5.3.5). 1 Overlay . • Roundabout will be put in at Bayshore ,_. and Thomasson as a Bayshore Recommendation included to make Complete Streets comprehensive roadway improvements along Bayshore Bayshore Drive Beautification MSTU project. Landscaping • Bayshore Dr needs to be considered for Drive and evaluate opportunity to underground streetscape and roadway updates via the overhead utilities(see Section 5.3.5,Section 5.3.6,and ` Bayshore Beautification MSTU. capital funding in Section 5.4). Other TIF-Funded Projects Botanical Gardens is now located southwest Specific planning tasks included for the 17-Acre Site of the Bayshore Drive/Thomasson Drive Botanical that highlight in particular connections to Sugden , intersection.The CRA currently owns the Gardens Regional Park and a performance space(see Section Support 17.89 acre site("17 Acre Site")west of 5.3.4 and capital and non-capital improvements in pp Sugden Regional Park;the site is targeted for . , �, Section 5.4). �. catalyst development. ...*'- Table 5-2-2(continued):Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-2-8 9A 5.2 BACKGROUND 4 - Section 5.2.3 and Sections 5.3 and 5.4 provide more • Stimulating investment and capitalizing on information on these additional considerations and their development opportunities while also providing basis. support and protections for existing residents • Navigating various perceptions of and visions for the area and incorporating arts and culture into the 5.2.3 Bayshore Gateway vision; marketing this vision Triangle CRA 2019 h Perspective , , _. , iT . Many of the challenges and efforts identified in the ' ' 2000 Plan are still relevant today.The following are il some of the major ideas emerging from the Redevelopment Area Plan update process,which provided the basis for the goals, objectives, and strategies underlying the framework(see Section 5.3) Transition between higher-density multifamilyhousing and lower-density single-family housing for this Redevelopment Area Plan: j • Improving the compatibility of uses and appearance of the public realm • Transitioning between suburban and urban : I1144 „ — development style , r ��E II -- ` .. • Balancing regional vs. local transportation needs �j �.. . and related transportation safety concerns along !if:major roadways; incorporating a focus on multi- modal transportation • Developing in the context of natural conditions and .F hazards (wetlands, Coastal High Hazard Area, flooding), including how to address increased Artistic and cultural elements of the CRA area include murals density/intensity l • Capitalizing on the valuable assets of the area or nearby, including parks, natural areas such as the canal system and Naples beaches, proximity to Downtown Naples,and tourism while also creating j j public spaces that can be claimed by the community ; 5.2.9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK a ELEMENTS . .. ,, . . . ,, . _ . , „.e., „. .... ,....,. .,,. .,...,. ....6,..":. 4 t' r •; • i. *+... ' -L 3 � if--4510,1, 4*: ::::: � Ji��•,,,e. , �,e, r ,if-_* ek. 3 s.r t 4 i • =-- • �c71.:;#,11%••,;',.:•, ' F .. - ♦ . /♦esaaa®aeaaato �aa000aseea4J. ......*****\ ..... a ♦�oao, „Ali",,,,,..,,,x..,-„,„,,,,, •*. k. .:„,,,„,,,,4÷.........,..„,.....,... .,,,..0,4,.. . , ..„.. .. 0. . ♦ s :- >_ V °eve `♦,.�<yL♦v�:°� 4 yaa♦aS e f e s ♦ :',4 Ya t +♦t 6 `�'.'h a a" / n ae 'ea ea ,t 4.* 4aaaie d ataoa e tr3,,,,,.. Se o4ab,.,°' d + 4tOMe . 4e♦eeeieef♦saea� fifaeoeese♦:eao♦eoe aeefeeiosi♦sfs♦aa • ®� r a 4 • e♦ , 5 • 3 ._ ,,,......tammaim,.. ......awne.mmormasestr , _. . _ ,.. ,‘_. '^QFC { { 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A i ggi L This page is intentionally left blank. i gi gi1 j i 5-3-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 • • • zt a.;"s`'..*^., `"5 '' '','' r-" 2 s,"",'''' _ °,,, "''. •••••'. %"_. '4 .• %';* : •' "n Y' ,, „• ";. ..n."..•, :•"••'•..""M'x ...,...,7'..••'•M.eat•' '°*,r':..-P,i.fr.- 5., 77,4.;a ,- - >.„.,..^*.., -7 � a Cr) 'O o 5n0 ns C,3 S -p 6O v n_ v au v ,--Di O Q (D. Q_ O7 -d O D 6D ■ •Ov rt - oh CM 6 CD� N C o• -• a c,' N C - v N 0 — Q !� ii/ ■• 1— , rt Q < ru v — 0 �. � C E1 D a CM rD C O o _, ( — n v c • n 20 3 -, n rD -. Ent Z CA w m p o O < ao Z_ vim, S v O � x. CDD 2° 0 O < Op N -h O Z Z C V' O '- Oh cn m v rD rr n O 0 v rt O rt _i O (D * < a0• -p 3 ' m -0 ,rt = C) rD -o rr o a C - Da) rD rD CI ' i 0) rpt -p3 -, 0- T- -p .-,- C n v -5 CD D- o ° a- 3 6 N °7- -, a) O f� > D3 rr DJ 3 < 3 _ N _ rt -- CU In 7v 1:1 v N Q Q -6 (n N C � S C n1 rD 0 W (D 3 co O n) H D <' (pi, - V O Q C w -' 0' 0 -s SO 7 n 00• p d cp' CD Cn rD -, nJ rD G • W O p� v'CC�i (D fl- C rD - On °i r1'•.Di S 3 rD 0 CD 0 7 S Q G. Q O ul N n Q _TI � X p' -, 3 L• -i, C- o O 2, -z C rD C W 00 C 7 (n Ip O n rCr O (.1 F Vii d- Q- (n cn C -p N 20 O -z 7- C C r+ r1 p d0 rD P (7) r-r n D N `° -0 rDD rr r� o Q° v D n VI O r” Q rr ? cn Q vl W rD r a rn Z N LP or DD DAVIS BLV I '� iy 90 n w t i = -# 0 ri r 11, � ' '1 Ii '', 3 T,. . " g r - d d r, j �� o i� I.71 �1 0 ._ria }L__h0. \ 4 M — , r 7,3,_ Ill 4, 1 1 7,17L IL,... ,,I ` .4-a '» ' 1 -� I :-.9: ._ > ., a f - G i Iw Z \� S �c 1 as '• .' 2 .' - �� cr . . _ r; - k • , \k\ i \ ilk .. . , °? G :- \ t ' '' TT`AVE '� , ,, °: .\ N. \ ` • ` N COlit-__` ,,, . ,,' 8 .i) - ' ' ‘‘ 7 \ C5-1 i 1 a • ' \ glIt ..,. ... \�`� 1`� Sugden f - \ _. co �Slq °' .4 ` R•E L - ` , Regional N •• �- rl �O VD ct- ' ..At, �� Park o Ili ._ , ,1 1= 4. ....., ,,,,, -' p ro ' DJ _hi ii.. ) : ' -� ' ' "�\ rri - -. � THOMASSON a, � 011 • rn ro -� 4 3 0 K `\ Nh. ` `� East Naples _ n wlirs ' \ \ \KAREN'DR` Community,; =4. ■ - — As, \ Naples ‘‘ 1,- \\.\\ • -"'; 'p m ,. \\s\ii..., P o k.\' ''t-. - Botani�\ - `1;cr ■ C.71 4 Gacden� �� - - o -o 1— K Bayview ' ♦ -.S ti,,.. .. .-;s , + v CD C D aiO y 4 C7 ` -, < • .. T _�1+. 41 O 'Nk4:4,\14,_ '' iN- 33:„ \ . . -. C! nD oIl< �1 p_ .,‘\ ,,N,44t,„ 1,.. _ co m ' n (._:. a . �I-k o > > , ° O ( 1441,4:4 GcCU ..•, - rDa 7, 0C n d z. y „ < rh D i i ,_ . . ._,, . :, ••• "At\:=2 ,kk,c:4k, ..:1414A. :1,..,:e.-7........:.., , ,. • , z. , ; , ,1 , , , .• ..< _.. . . 1 5, $ co F.. i - O ul c m W A. I ar,a 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9A This page is intentionally left blank. 5-3-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —Draft March 2019 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9A Location-Specific Capital Projects Land Use&Urban Design Projects 0 Gateway Intersection Design A. Davis Blvd/Airport Pulling Rd Improvements B. Davis Blvd/Shadowlawn Dr C. Davis Blvd/US 41 D. US 41/Bayshore Dr E. Thomasson Dr/Dominion Dr F. Us 41/Osceola Ave Development 411 Development Projects A. Development of Multi-Purpose Facility/Structure Public Space,Parks,&Open Space Projects Parks improvements A. Triangle Retention Pond Improvements Transportation, Connectivity,&Walkability Projects 4 Complete Streets(Major) A. Linwood Ave—Phase I B. Shadowlawn Ave C. Bayshore Dr—Us 41/Thornasson Dr D. Thomasson Dr/Hamilton Ave E. Commercial Dr F. Kirkwood Ave/Kirkwood Ave Connection G. Pine St Connection QComplete Streets&Trails A. Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail (Neighborhood) B. Jeepers Dr C. Linwood Ave—Phase II D. Republic Dr E. Danford St F. Bay St G. Bayshore Dr—Thomasson Dr/Holly Ave 6 Parking A. Surface/garage parking—Mini Triangle area B, Surface/garage parking—Bayshore area C. Car/boat parking—Bayview Park area General Road Engineering A. Pine Tree Dr Standard Improvements B. Andrews Ave C. Woodside Ave D. Holly Ave E. Palmetto Ct rill Infrastructure A. Underground/Relocate Overhead Utility Lines—Linwood Ave and Commercial Dr B. Underground/Relocate Overhead Utility Lines—Bayshore Dr 5-3-4 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan —Draft March 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 9 4 ` -- Non-Location Specific Capital Projects Project Type Pry Name Public Space, Parks,&Open Space A. Pocket Park Land Acquisition&Development B. General Parks Improvements C. Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements Development A. Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust Transportation,Connectivity,& A. Sidewalk Gap Improvements Walkability B. Bicycle Infrastructure C. Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements • D. General Multi-Modal Improvements Infrastructure A. Water Main and Fire Suppression Upgrades B. Stormwater Improvements C. Upgrade Sanitary Sewer Lines �.Y Non-Capital Projects • General market study/economic profile Projects and initiatives that are not capital • Bayshore Drive Complete Street technical investments include a variety of plans, studies, and feasibility grant programs in support of redevelopment or • Bayshore Drive Complete Streets pilot project capital project planning throughout the CRA area. These non-capital projects and initiatives include: • Triangle retention pond improvements CRA operating expenditures and administrative • Micro enterprise and arts incubator ;. updates • CRA boundary expansion Land Development Code updates Grants and funding programs, including: ; Development support for catalyst development sites • Residential improvements grants/loans =«. Master planning for: • Commercial facade improvements • Stormwater improvements • Wall and fence funding for areas with • Arts—and culture-oriented development and incompatible uses k� redevelopment efforts • Public art funding ;, • Implementation of Complete Streets projects • Economic development incentives • Community safety and clean-up • Mobile home replacements • Branding • Community Land Trust housing construction • Marketing and communications • Other affordable/workforce housing investments • Water and fire infrastructure improvements Other non-capital expenditures that may arise in the Feasibility studies, including: future and are not yet identified ,.w Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-5 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9A Future Land Use Densities The following table shows Future Land Use densities corresponding to designations on the Concept Map(Figure 5-3-1). Note that certain projects in the Redevelopment Overlay are eligible for additional units from a pool of 388;these units are referred to as"density pool units" below.Also note that the entire CRA area lies in the Coastal High Hazard Area, which deducts one unit per gross acre(UPGA)from the eligible base density of four units per acre (UPA)and does not permit rezones for mobile home development. Future Land Use Densities A. Mixed Use—Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Overlay =z; Mixed Use Activity Center B. Residential—Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Overlay; 16 UPGA for area outside of overlay Redevelopment Overlay- 12 UPA via density pool units (with cap of 97 density pool units per project); Properties with access to US 41 limits apply for projects that do not comply with the requirements for this East/Bayshore Dr/Davis Blvd density increase.The Mini Triangle catalyst site (east of the Davis Blvd/US 41 (84)/west side of Airport-Pulling Rdl intersection) is an exception,with a maximum 70 dwelling UPA. Residential only: 8 UPA via use of density bonus pool (with cap of 97 density Redevelopment Overlay— pool units per project). Eligibility requires that the project: Properties having frontage on 1. shall be a Planned Unit Development(PUD) one or more of Bayshore Drive, 2. shall be a minimum of 3 acres Davis Boulevard,Airport- Pulling 3. shall be redevelopment of a site Road (west side only) or US 41 4. consist of all market-rate units East2 Limits apply for projects that do not comply with the requirements for this density increase. Urban Residential Subdistrict Maximum residential density determined through Collier County's Density (outside Redevelopment Rating System, but shall not exceed 16 UPA except in accordance with Overlay) Transfers of Development Rights in the Land Development Code. To facilitate hurricane evacuation and protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation designated area, residential densities within the Subdistrict shall not exceed a maximum of 4 UPA, except as allowed in the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict Density Rating System to exceed 4 UPA through provision of Affordable (outside of Redevelopment Housing and Transfers of Development Rights, and except as allowed by Overlay) certain Future Land Use Element Policies under Objective 5 in the Growth Management Plan. New rezones to permit mobile home development within this Subdistrict are prohibited. Rezones are recommended to be in the form of a PUD. 'According to Collier County Growth Management staff,this definition is interpreted broadly to mean properties that can gain access to the road(s), whether directly(access point on the road)or via one or more other roads;it is not viewed narrowly to mean have an access point onto the road(s).As a result,this definition encompasses all properties in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay except those on east side of Airport Road. 2According to Collier County Growth Management staff,such properties must literally have frontage on(abut)one or more of the specified roads. 5-3-6 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9I PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 '"'" 5.3.2 Land Use & Urban Design .. The Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code (LDC) provide tools to shape land use and urban design, which have a direct impact on the built environment of an area.This section highlights existing conditions related to various land use types, as well as u' ways to promote a defined, harmonious,and urban visual and land use character tailored to the CRA area, cultivating its unique artistic and cultural identity. ..• O GOAL k ' Promote a defined,harmonious,and urban visual and land use character tailored to the CRA area, cultivating its unique artistic and cultural identity. PO E£ .ix { ' I . Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-7 5•3 _ PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A ['''-' 0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing Residential Land Use Characteristics The CRA area has 3,814, dwelling units according to Florida Department of Revenue 2017 data.These units include a range of housing types from mobile to larger single-family to multi-family homes(see Map 5-3-2 and corresponding images).This diversity of types,when coupled with a range of price points,can accommodate a diversity of residents living in the community.Currently,streets such as Jeepers Drive(picture 3 below)show areas of transition between larger residential and smaller residential,as well as between smaller single-family residential and multi-family on nearby streets.The vision set forth in the Redevelopment Area Plan aims to guide these transitions towards the desired built environment character laid out for different sub-areas(see Section 5.3.8). . r "� r '‘,.;kit.-.:-;,. � �� 11 s'c'T S41. ,. • / - _.. — — _ .�-.•r _ . Mobile home Single-family housing L.. { 3 4 , , d Fr ' -,. ..:iiainni;iiiiuu ,,.. ,_ ME g ik y t' our, k- - r Small single-family near large new singlefamily with guest house Gated community housing 5 x 6 - , , tffig...7., .,.....,_ .-.--.. .i,zr,-....-.-,..,,,--_-_,..., ) . t.1.040110/ -1'--,- - -- ' - :— 1 ' ..i 1 - - 'i""'�'y; . j6 £ 1'i � • jti ___-,_fes-��_ r s_ A :. ;, yyy<. .. -...Nie-;' - ... .- Small multi family housing Multifamily housing 5-3-8 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 L HI 11� � . - v a.�.I 11u : ■ 1:■:r'° A f.,,`p��■III III 1 1 u u DAMS BLVD �) KIRKWOOD AVE "l"��■u' _, f14■//!1191■' k. Q ■■1I '1111911111 _,. i +1 ,j .. I ! 919 111. +1 L�INWSOOD=AVEII i 2 la -. —� ,.1r 3-, ,� i _.. 11111111 ix? 1 i 1' `' lti�ii! .;� O ■111/1'O �.-rJ - �— -',--3-..•,:.... 'Ll - 4. / f ,,'.i/q. a u ri. I, Irc w Ir ,i` �l/°T,Q�T .■/N1, Q t t �`\�� ' ; ) 4, jr--N,K N L. 64• mi irivi I ,...1F1----) ,,. I i ___ 1 i F_I__L_L_, •• Iltill i • ir , 1. ...,., ,_ — ,r—i----,J•3111 Ito, .... i ; 1 �I haul iliiuliiili//■ i-,,,,../ imam ` )j ,_ ,...c- mil .. z �� 41,..... t ' ' ,itu R / a r. j r' �C3 ��mar uunill■/� '.�, r•.'.ti i 44 „,,,,,I,,,,..1,,.:.-4.&:.....: _.. M I li., �-7 iii ear 1911 ' I... -- !'- .;_A, a uu I:■ 11111 illi■al■ 14 -alu _ # Jr. ty.Q urn �/ r r it ilium r--\\ , vJ r- -a imaiilm=a ' i �� t" iii TP ,1 uuuml—c nnuamt ■ 1111■1 ' .r ,IIIIIII/119■/1 1 euuummumxa _..._. .___....... .&.-ry lauuuuInnui CC •••ff l.•'I •i. 111u1111:311 0 4 1. r _uIln ;• (/1111 li , O , i 'X----:1114-16.f� I=i} _ Sudden . gR Regional o nr„ 8c 3 !dual$ Park • D ,naafi■ y.„ Q menu _ - inn I 1 "iv- ,-1,-- • 4 THOMASSON DR.. - ___l. I 1..._._ i —_ e" \� I 111111111•1111111111 ,! �•7'� 1 • ■�Illllfl/■Illllllllla --�---n- - Z s.. O KAREN DR.n • i �.. n vzoa3 , Q `. ` 11 �r •• { yJu -- ,...„„,..,..„4.,....s.:.7::::..7.4g...7.,--,,r,li.-r,..- .4,.... _, x[[ Ba .view -I/III/IIIIlliiil i•' II 1'IIII IIIII:: ::,< Fark 1/ suit 11111 E-` IA■ .--,--:-..: 7,...... d, -.". I Single Family Res dental e�'` e .. ...'X u. El Mobile Home > l ..,,,k;.:7-.......:. _:__ t..‘:::...•.-Q:•:. 1¢ I 11111111111/��11� """-' Mua�Family Resi enha �1 :::vau *_ tilut .:. :.`.: ::ed ::',alui:i-- "._._ jai `ANDREWS�AVE='>•_'::.:7:=_ P Properly Parcel - _ '.._•�.!-... �:. n��L11iWllllllllll''�-�:.,.N11r4 ID CRA Boundary ':_::71 .. -.4!16": M•IIIIIIMIMMIlin a, - _.1” II .. Park .:3c. !e.'•- ,iww _ I! " e Wetlands a;• U _-_ 111!. r,...;;.._. Ir..' L -;:. 11 _. ,II 11111 .- --- L. Cit of Na des ktlri fila `' ,_ 1.7:::__Wit .=nk4 , ..:'Ulu.`.. _ .._._. ._.. ._ l .��. �• �>r•,:_'_:'.. .... :_._]ILC:::_::'•.]'lUf.:." a�(,s .'^ 11�[G.::':",. • ' 4Y- •-a.r,•. 1]}.. .'�1{ llltr' �lU,: J 4]Ik: lu :: • :-:.:----lllu. : }�Jir � :.Ir r-{. d ..U::Mle__.r;. r. _:-10/:,.".._._ ... .:. »tu.::- . i :. uc ., i^ ' Map 5-3-2: Existing Residential Land Use Characteristics;Data source:2017 Florida Department of Revenue tx ' Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-9 4-, 9 A , PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ,,,,;, . 0 EXISTING CONDITIONS o. Existing Commercial&Industrial Land Use Characteristics 4 4 . , As with housingtypes,there are a range of commercial types in the CRA area (see Map5-3-3 and corresponding 41 Yp g YP p g images). Many commercial sites include on-site,street-facing surface parking.The area contains two major mall-style rVis- commercial spaces,Gulfgate Plaza and Courthouse Shadows. Uses range from restaurants and retail stores to heavier uses such as auto services. Industrial uses are also present in the Triangle area and northwest of Sugden Park. .,,,,,,,,,,,,\ iil , , . d IF i. 1.* ' New neighborhood commercial on Bayshore Drive—Three60 Market Mall commercial—Gulfgate Plaza IIIi ....„ , `0 3 4 g �' :u.V y� y.9,.yc, -i-, , ff by A ,:t.4•44., •s - 4 �. - :,- -..1---,t'-- .. Mall commercial—Courthouse Shadows Linwood Avenue commercial pypa g4yr n , F $` 5 s • , .. ,_. , ,, ' . it � , .. --0 �a Multi-story strip commercial Vertical mixed-use 5-3-10 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9 A# PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 I "---i WOOD AVE It k . ! 1.?4Ig - ' :41.4 INWOODAVE '.----, ap • �i -l p O L 79 u � c c, 4.: lig �� 1-,------. ti_.... L 11 I I 901 �� t f Y tit I, , RD I S I i , 1 ' . it , , .../ : ' 4.L at 3 C 1 I ; _v � ion , , 01 _. BARRETTAVE ` l, ,_, 4 tri t o J-, x c, W/N a II 4,41Sugden p DSTAR m , Regional O 8ZV0 A b _22,1 — Park •'rt ; i THOMASSON DRR=- _.____ w i Z ■ O KAREN DR-- -'• Vacant Non-Residential 1 g Naples East Naples .Commercial Community,= a ,1z Botanical — k. •Industrial ,;t„. :Garden - Park .Institutional _,;A? Bdy 1N • ` iw - Naples Botanical Garden Park ■ a a i .County -r g, al A ;.i*'.;.:a:.� .State . ( .'----.,:-.7.::. '. ..__:•. A R pi Utility/Other :.. '- . • _ k 11.Naples :-.11r.. .:7:: a ;.'._ DEWS VE t, ji �a - "'acs.' rA _••;.7.......--e::::.;: ; 4b PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9A 4 ,s 0 EXISTING CONDITIONS i-11* RiiA Existing Community-Oriented Uses , Community-oriented uses support community-building and provide services via government,faith-based,non-profit, and other entities.The Redevelopment Area Plan aims to preserve and enhance these uses.Government �� establishments in the area include the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area office,a Naples Fire Rescue station,and r the County Center(see Map 5-3-4 and corresponding images).Schools in and near the area include Avalon Elementary, Shadowlawn Elementary,and The Garden School of Naples(a Montessori school).There are also various arts-oriented ,c: spaces, places of worship,and non-profit service providers. Evaluating locations for a libraryor other public meeting �� f` space can also facilitate the addition of community services and spaces. wF vit 1 2 k\� ` ` �� k�e� i1111".. �. .1. v`• } rte' _ ( i f) M` ' z kBayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Office Avalon Elementary School 3 = .- 4 k JUDY&JOHN HU HON t -, - 'ww, ), THEATRE — P • 1R S i'zc irk ,.., Opera Naples East Naples Baptist Church I ,Y. Greater Naples Fire Rescue—Station#22 Catholic Charities 5-3-12 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 1 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 •-•,-..5-:,..,...1.....,,,,, ,,,,..:Ltr.,1,•1 Nj11 ,111111111111 MO I AVIS BL " A .-, alinlini,114 V A „ =if . 'AVE ' k--- 4)- ... ! -, !--!'.,____', IP noIPLIN OOD AVE zt 7 : , ..._ „ • at L 1 1'',AP,4 r ...t. • \/- ... '-- - • ! ‘. Itac :'RI • , . 0 , . I 6 1 - ' 1'':.:::J' : ..,;.,. :-., o „.1 -'..••••:'.Cii.. 1----1, ' . , 1 ,. /16 -H no ', I i L •• :, , ..!, ..• , c...., D F.' ....- ‘, _ P BARRETT AVE 1 1 m, , ,) „ X,....., • A ..- .. l'iii,vp a St,ili 4- . Regional 7,,:. . ----, NI/(11--- Park .,iv--.•-_.,., ,D.:,,, .:>. -;:.- \ ; .tie..::E-r• ';;;,i .z.T. ,,,, :::-."4.4; • ,_.... ,,..I , ., •v,:z7.::-. '-s,-, . or . . - i - L,- , 1 THOMASSON DR - -- '--. - .1. al I I. ,; 'z .: :.: KAREN DR-• a ,.pi. ..i. lin._._;Vacantommercial Non-Residential Naples . -unity 7 owl --..,,,,,.. Botanical - m Industrial , I.e.:, .:;:t:,,Garden LZ-1".%) 'I'. IN institutional , - I . .. •- , . •' -. 1 ---,4?- '-‘3.y.,, ',i,;--->,.. .:L:.::'.:: :.: Naples Botanical Garden BayvieW .' ,', .. . :-,-,.; -.- -..7-..':.:-.1. Park ;;-- r i Illir ":•`;-'''' ----'-'. r.;1:4, - ",.1,1:' i4t.:..- -.141-:4 _•County .2.--s-;:•. , .r.f•..;:•:::,i.,-:•,1...-7..:: •••„;.::.: ,,,•:,.:;., •:;4_,..;,...:..„.:::•• =state ,..,...., "•4: . -:,.."..,,s1k.-.T.: :: _:. .44'. --.., . ._.- :AC .....-... „..,a.,-' -7,-,.i,11‘;,.... 11111 Naples ANDREWS - Ak:.:::- - -...---:•....'. ;;IZ. Nir,,-: I5'.f,:':: AVE7's:•:-.41:7-7"-7:-.;: n Utility/Other Le,.„...._.,,... ! ... 4c?.-::::: -* 4 ..:, !'' -'''''' .;i:i.l''': - .4.e"‘P'!..4(-::: ID CRA Boundary ...z-a-,:..1ta-. •:::: .4:-:±j):: 1111 Park Alte..:.7:: :44: .44kC•:.:-JA**..:1' "- ;7'Wetlands •*.'"' Wetlands i • ... 7•••••:-.??&\-‘,. .:-' '''....•..--.7. 7.-;.'---•• 44.:,.:,,Z.::::::-f :.. :: z 1 ......::::.,t1k....=......,),,..... ' • ., ,f,.. • - :7 1!,4 - ...$);ke :1'..-;•.---;*:."-::''.N.il.,;';"f,L: ;:;.....:..---. ...: ;--- INEMMICUlillIM NAiie ,. 4'';;':::4; -;;;-•:;"-? --At.---1.,.1!--j. 'Ak:*-.-.4,..AL .,.., , ii•'.-t-k,-74.k-Z.::,,,'---,-'.•,„„. ,:' ,ij•,‘,..-,-,-,..!.....: .----•,--- • sb-..•-,.... ,..'• .••-:.:::..i_.,. .......„,,.. -,4,....:.72:•_,,,::.;:. ,,_._-_•-•-, ,„,.. „T.:,,_-'-7 41.e. '7:.••••:•:-..,::7-..:-...-. . .:.-.:....'.7:- .: ,..:,•'•• '-',4;..,::411/. 7.--::?.'Ng& -sic' .. L., . _2. 4. r; ,,-,. .1:1.1:.•ti)r. ; :: ;,1,-,; -; :4-;.:::7 NIti...:::.:..-----------N*-i---- -. • -- Map 5-3-4: Community Oriented Land Use Characteristics with Non-Residential Existing Land Use;Data source:2017 Florida Department of Revenue 5-3-13 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A Objective 1: Promote urban-style development. • Strategy 1:Coordinate with Collier County Growth Management and Zoning Divisions to pilot innovative land use and zoning approaches to promote more urban-style development in the LDC.These approaches might include: • Increasing mixed use designations • Focus increased densities/intensities along improved roadways(with consideration of Coastal High Hazard Area restrictions) • Roadway design standards to support multi-modal transportation (see Section 5.3.5) • Reduced building setbacks • Zoning for live/work spaces • Zoning and incentives for accessory dwelling units • Flexible parking regulations • Strategy 2: In awarding density pool units, establish eligibility requirements and/or performance metrics that promote these urban approaches. �s 4 f , x 5-3-14 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 3 9A ' PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS53 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A.. Character Images I ��,�� .. 1 :-,f WO i j y{ y `l ! �`rV," '7.'" k f. ^�. ti . ,..._ Jii. .:,„...,,, .....„ ..,.. 44 , . f 1 i a Local Mix Uses e � I _ e �,:;-.11,_„'"1,1071", �. e 3 )1 ' 4'I. i '1 0:0,, ,. ., _ ...„.„ ”,.,,„ „. „. .,...„._ , ..,., .. .,.., G i ,.. .,.., ,.. ,.. _, _ .„.._ iC--1 ,, ., a , H 0 N. I I *4 :Iltfitt,_!.,,,,...,,,-4, ' _. , .-., ty• .., Promote use of quest houses(shown here in back of main house)as a way to provide additional density and potentially address Local multi-family housing styles affordability Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5_3-15 5.3,t PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 4A Objective 2: Achieve consistent land uses in the CRA area and sub-areas. • Strategy 1: Use sub-area ("Character Area")characteristics (see Section 5.3.8)to guide land use vision in the CRA area. • Strategy 2:Amend the LDC to limit heavy commercial and V manufacturing/warehouse/storage uses throughout the CRA area;evaluate incentives to encourage transitions away from '' heavy commercial and manufacturing/warehouse/storage uses. • Strategy 3: Identify elements in the LDC to create clear transitional areas and land use buffers between uses that are incompatible (see Figure 5-3-2); coordinate buffers with related improvements, such as landscaping improvements via the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. • Strategy4: Provide funding through CRA-funded grant programs for transitional structures(e.g.,walls and fences) between incompatible uses. Provide guidance in the program guidelines to coordinate with related elements, such as design standards and Bayshore Beautification MSTU improvements. • Strategy 5: Provide clear guidance in the LDC for new and emerging uses to ensure consistency with the respective Character Areas. Ns k. k�w 5-3-16 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9a PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION "-' Land Use Transition Types 14 N,`,,I,54`,4 There are four main types of land use strategies to transition between differing land use types(Figure 5-3-2). t Factors affecting use of any given type might include characteristics of the particular site or the general Character Area. BUILDING sf ,. ...1 .. .°.�. a i mi._tr.r... r n., . ,, 1,.. i +�..i _ _ ,, ,,,, 4. , i 8 .. 11.1).___L I w Residential C{.rtirUUC':i rift' PARKING LOT/LANDSCAPE imisme ow v -....,.., - . . .„., . .1., aqiirf,,,,, 1 1. ,,,,,, ,,,,I r.,,,r1 r - r - - - t 7 ' ' ' gl lila 0 0 _-_-_,_-_--, __ ,. ! -LI-,- f , , Residential Landscape Buffer/Parking Lot Mixed-Use/ GREEN/OPEN SPACE ( �� a toy ... . r : :1 r 1"...1.1 - I II -a 1111 i. tr.ilil r. ....- .0 - --r• Residential Natural Features Public Square Mixed-Use/ i INTENSITY OF USE I 7 z - n r4 s:r:on -__ ....0 , 1 r • p, ;14-13 -,fit , , ,1 ' ;.- lif 41* , _ ' r.:74 r-r _ 1 aa,, ,, - ; 6 Residential Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use! Commercial Figure 5-3-2:Land Use Transition Types Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-17 5.3 ,< PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 0 RECOMMENDATIONS Needed Land Use Transitions; Uses Elements to facilitate transitions can be helpful where there are dissimilar uses,built forms,or development styles. Strategies range from land use buffers(e.g.,gradual transition in density/intensity,open space buffers;see Figure 5-3-2), physical barriers(e.g,walls,fences, landscaping),or limitations placed on uses incompatible with the area's land use vision. Map 5-3-5 shows the generalized base zoning districts, highlighting areas with use boundaries that might benefit from transition strategies.The highlighted areas are described further below. Focus:transition from interior residential area of Triangle to the major commercial corridors surrounding it Strategies: • Put in place land use transition areas of lighter commercial or multi-family residential near single- family residential areas • Promote use of physical barriers/buffers between heavier commercial uses and residential uses • Limit heavier industrial and commercial uses in the Triangle area Focus:transition from commercial to residential and between different residential densities Strategies: • Establish land use transition areas to transition from commercial and denser multi-family along Bayshore Drive to moderately dense multi-family residential to single-family residential 4 '. Focus: put in place transition strategies to mesh new development coming online with existing uses Strategies: • Establish land use transition areas tti 5-3-18 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 on. _.n i I -- I �� KIRKW00 o GM3 /..._..._.....__ 1 1 �i 7 t° �1 aOD'AVE 11 nq z lanaHu.,.., �� i ; 31idniMNlaa D 7: •'1 a I lilt . r sell %I ,. �II �� H I iii ----1111 ' 1 . , u �' Li,,,,,,, 0 i `' _ 1 ,-...--1-C-1 fl- 1 ll I 2Y lt.. ` I � I it f x � �" El.:,,...._ _. '''-''' 4 .,„ i . E \ 1 . I,...•-• ,..„.'s4r je.„- ke5 , , _ -.'cle:„.",:it.'ie t..., l....__,......„ ,..„ B_AT.,tii 1 k 10),----,y/ 1 e u t IRO I \........" z '`S-- A[ . it min 7 -� `•' 7.. ;Q� 1.11 salmi ) ��`- e ,, 4 tin, t. i \•\; 7' 111111 ( i f ..- Q w/NOSF 4` Sugden qR, - Regional _*77 co , 1/, I Park — \ r 1 ar 3 ,. 11 -i Q 41i i`I^' ,12 1 i' .Commercial Z e► uKAREN;DR° -=" city of Naples '{ 1 a • es •, ` , is.EastNaples '' Mobile Home , s p *el, I ¢ Botanica Community MPUD 1 C _ oflt- Park PUD i _ r Residential Multi-Family Park _�: Ba view' , l t+A , ': Res.PUD MU Res.Subdist Single-Family Residential :milt !a .111111 ,�, ' Village Residential r. " 7 1 ®meANDREWS AVE' r Property Parcel h_.. •;ttu: rai1a1111111111111111i1 gat• E3 CRA Boundary i'Ilipll?JI7P!�Illlii `-- .: - l ...,�_� ..._. - Park Wetlands vttlis•„eu i i,rui � - F € ` ` `'f _j City of Naples vJ . 4r• .4 'ilk*:._:• :.__ ' ..__. 4' 2"'' 4 -Site.-::.'4ide.Ai.-- '14*.'1':*-`4A, lf.'.!.!'.St.y S1tEt . '4.4'... ,1,,,r....., -=1t ={: vttr -._. ?.r uta ::'?SYr_._.•.. c- .?? _ ulii 2 to Map.5-3-5: Needed Land Use Transitions with Base Zoning Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-19 9 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS li • y EXISTING CONDITIONS Needed Land Use Transitions: Building Heights Identifying boundaries between different existing zoned building heights can indicate areas where land use transition approaches may be helpful. Map 5-3-6 shows the applicable Mixed Use Overlay Districts that provide more detailed design standards for the CRA area with highlighted transition areas from Map 5-3-4 and maximum zoned heights of buildings in the table below. Note that there are exceptions for certain structures in the code(e.g.,church spires, antenna). PUD sites are governed by zoning in their respective ordinances. mr=, Maximum Zoned Height of Building in Feet Mixed Use Overlay Mobile Civic& Designation House Rowhouse Apartment Mixed-Use Commercial Home institutional BMUD-NC 42 42 42 56 56 42 BMUD-W 42 42 42 56 56 42 z,, BMUD-R1 35 35 35 35 BMUD-R2 35 35 35 35 BMUD-R3 35 30 35 35 35 s BMUD-R4 35 35 GTMUD-MXD 42 42 42 56 56 42 I GTMUD-R 35 35 35 35 • ■ a ■ I Needed Transition Area 4 0 5-3-20 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 .5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A i _ I -----, i N I' . 5 BLVD------1,31r----- ----------------) -- - •** .----------------:: • A KIRKWOO 1 ...... I . ..1-- -‘_....._.... LINW OD ZA . / ---1 1 • ,e ,11.-4 -' . : , I I- I ••NW 7::.,..:• 1 1 144,.- • _--C.3 —7: ika / • L. ---..........., ,-----. I ) 1 - • 3 . 1 I _J.. 1 1,-- 'cV --I f '..„:—FT. • I 1 ----I Ill _1 11 -, -— .. . . . . ..1._ Li.: i -----)------c,.__,-- , ) , -f......,=A; 1 '4.. 4 ....... _i_.....„ .:-:-:,.1:\ , i , ....it_- - - -\,,•4 q . .".... , , : ) ' k, BARRETTaa \/ 'E.::.... dp •0 , _ ,,,„, f• 1._______E: ..\ 'SP‘2's 1 1 4 Z , mom se z cc , ....- Ilk . rA I ,ac _ ..,,.. A- , .• Sug d,e..,n >- 10Regiona..l ,- Park •,,i'tic..:::: co ..-::,..-.*.:.:7.'e*.•.:*,.-::::.:::-::::-Y:..:.'....:: Q t t it -- If _ ._ \..., \ ‘4. PI, sial a • ........ ''':::?-`11.4g. ....:-• THOMASSON OR III 0 CRA Boundary Mia i -::::. \\Ite.• ib - - Park ....„ •-• z l -.1::-.:,..)11,/.-'..'-.:::. •••'' 0 Ar . -KAREN 0:;:i ' --,t,_ ZONING ,..•:.4::.....:*.. /----JI EastiNip I L- I.PUD- -- Naples II, „Auk, - 2.`•-• Community •r, I 1 Botanical . Garden 0, RMF-6 rib: 711111"". ''= Ili BMUD-R1 -.-., Sr. , ,-7-• .'.- I BMUD-R2 Bayview- :t------ :':•43..A.k. Park 1 C a l'-"4„.. -- ---1 BMUD-R3 1 BMUD-R4 .•:-:.-:':1 ••:---• ,--..:...*lk" - ...........• BMUD-NC ,...1*(71A I • ,.. •---- ".'Aire ' 4i)--:-•:.4'7: ff.:.\4.::::: ANDREWS AVE--*:::-. ,*-7•":f:.7?-fee- -:::•--.....:11•:::::--.P`' . : .el'ff::-- I• "*"..' ':":.-*•• 4-' 4"''.---41e-.:'..... ...::.:r*';'.'::-::..- . 1-rilge 17f4i.e- Ill GTMUD-MXD (.:e....:C.i.-..::. 1::.:It'±.;:q((.::.:::::i...:.;. -ii *H•:::::ii,:-.. ..`'.. 4L.-. ;12...: -;,..- *:4 _. /''''2 ,r.:-;`?.„iti,-7 .4.k.:-::::: --- [ City of Naples •-•• •- • 7 •..._'. .1i,.:::::;:.-,--• 7 *..;T:. '•'1.7.-: ::,•::: .1.t ..;';:::, -• ...- , ,, ••4c.-.::::Nilk:. Mite ' .- - --.4'.'.- -44,7:.,•-"•:*•. ,--h4(e: . r.... .::----.., -:-.. ,7.-:'51k t ,.. ,_•:7 , ,, .: ..'...::.'.:7-.,:.4.91:.::-..'ei:'-:__ -- 1:!....• -'..:!•....-.:: :.(i.., -,1,....:,...:...::7-7..:2.4c.. ..:,..,..:. .: . ...,...`-•:::: .:.....,• =-:;:. ':;----1,1 • C-.7-"..niliF::.....;•'Aii;.- --*'-di:-.•:•::'.'Ate''..->.-tli.-,--.-2'.' Map 5-3-6: Mixed Use Overlay Districts in the CRA Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-21 9A 5.3 a` PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS t • Strategy 6: Evaluate opportunities for arts-oriented filli ADDITIONAL INFORMATION code flexibility that will incorporate existing arts activity such as gallery space. Character Images for Design Style Objective 3: Achieve a consistent design A number of buildings in the CRA establish a modern ,ftcharacter in the CRA area and sub-areas architectural style that the CRA can promote in public that cultivates the area's unique artistic and realm design;there are a number of residences with a k. cultural identity. more traditional Florida style that the CRA can also s • Strategy 1:As part of a CRA-specific Arts and promote.Art that is incorporated into private Culture Plan (see Section 5.3.4, Objective 1, development, but visible in the public realm, can also Strategy 5), develop a comprehensive design contribute to the community character conveyed in approach for the public realm with reference to the physical environment(see the character photos on specific Character Areas.The approach might the facing page). In addition to architectural style, sign consider: styles can be considered as part of public realm design. • Architectural styles, including resilient Figure 5-3-3 provides potential sign design options for designs that better manage natural the Bayshore neighborhood of the CRA area, reflecting �_ the style of existing infrastructure.The CRA can hazards such as flooding • Transitional elements between Character promote a more modern design for the Triangle area kit Area designs, building mass types, etc. in the commercial areas targeted for redevelopment. (see Section 5.3.8) 'w k, �fi: • Design considerations for gateway/focus intersections a • Design considerations for public art • Identification of public art opportunities and incentives • Design considerations for streetscape ' improvements in coordination with the Bayshore Beautification MSTU Master Plan • Design considerations for CRA-funded grants for façade and other exterior kms: improvements • Incorporation of urban-style development design standards (see Section 5.3.2, Objective 1) • Airport Zone height restrictions • Strategy 2: Fund a commercial facade grant program for exterior improvements to commercial buildings not targeted for major redevelopment. esty 5-3-22 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS €'-f vooetga 420 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ` . "" fi .,.. k"" �c s�.>. . +. '41''''''.:'"III-I'74,''''-'--2,-.:- .11-1-.I'.'5 Pr :!:7'.iFtf'''TeL lip • \-„, *MOM 4 3r' .�.w.wlt le;� Z '$" raa jrP'Y " ' ., . Modern design of Ankrolob Brewing Co.(Source:Hlevel Modern design of The Garden School(Sources Carbon Architects,http://hlevel.info/project/ankrolab_bre) Architecture/Planning/Sustainability,http:// r wing_co� www.davidcorbon.com/the-garden-school/f a,' r"r"` Local residence with modern design style ti '�P' Epi ir ,,,tm w _tii ,, :: . 1 ri,t_l___;_ ,,,::- ;14 \„,,:14.„,.............:..., .,‘„,„......4„4.,..„,,:f., . , i , _ . . ,,,,„.......„,„:„....„,.........4„,. .*_....:4100 .....,„, .. _, , , _ . :...4:,. ..,..4,...1..kr:.,..... .. ... . . ... ,.. .., ,..,..,..,,„....„...„........,. . „ ,.. . 4. Ili --4' Opera Naples with modern design style Local residential design Local residential design \--- go 'vim' _ f # RIgi f � `-@ �F u `- 1.4. a451 h r,' -` ° r Local residential design Local residential design Art in the public realm on Bayshore Dr —-- �. , r u , -*F nErvonst VS B I , - wrxnreaxrao-wz nrwv:rre.r., <xn�•ru.. • .• lesiO�verl Tindale Oiiyer Figures 5-3-3:Sign Design Examplesf: x ' - Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-23 i 9 A ,04 :; PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 0 RECOMMENDATIONS a e m e e e e e e e e e e e e e a s e e a e m e m e.N „a:<r i r c s; Design Treatments&Attributes Public realm design in the area is important given the emphasis on arts-oriented development and input from public outreach efforts indicating architectural style as a way of building a sense of place and community.The Bayshore Beautification MSTU has contributed significantly to the design of the southern portion of the CRA area with streetscape improvements including lighting,flags,landscaping,and the design of the Bayshore/Thomasson roundabout.The CRA should coordinate with the MSTU for further improvements, including the design of major gateway intersections that can include signs and public art(see Map 5-3-7 for opportunities). Note that gateway intersection opportunities north of US 41 would not qualify for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds,yet the northern Triangle area can explore the creation of its own MSTU to fund these and other types of improvements(see Section 5.3.7,Objective 3,Strategy 2). t ; w` ' '.0, ''''- ' 4 . ‘1 A Existing gateway design near US 41 and Bayshore Drive Ihillit 0Iv �� te... 1 ,, ii: 3. , ` k yflag, yBayshore Drive lighting,bike lane,landscaping,pavement $ treatments ■ ■ ■ a MSTU Improvements r *fze f }► .iii ,, Gateway Design Opportunities 1 , i Bayshore Drive/Thomasson Drive roundabout rendering 5-3-24 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 r . .. — I , I DAVIS., -' ' •uII I I II7■. I I! �1I iii 1 ` _... --� .- __ A ',� `�� uu nmu ■KIRKWOOD-AVE LINWOOD AVE ,, 'C7 '-u--"-' �,y i IIII■Z 11■glll t11111ii ~� ��, �' yJ� 1 ____ j?IIII■IIIIIIIIIIIII v.-1, __ _- i Vii"' °rua ► ,a ea, E ¢ • • c i ; ■uue VT". I.: II! 'ii ?i� ®i%■H _-UAtf I I ' , ..ij T9 O emu z r._ _. _ ,t; -. 0 IMIllii y_ •;-"i.Vlig.....:ftyl i 1 Li..j1F---r ■ �)FJ p..-.-a f .I Y �I II■ � j — ir , -r- {f � _ ��^�' 1 Fief-.HI ... \ � �' INIIINIIIINUIINI .� M.wyC l i ,. t L (` Mit 111■■INI� IN! 14 - 1 MIS ., .. _A— • #I 1 » r "!ii li uix \�' .�nnn-� I ';. ii-. ,i. n 710 Iii-- • IGldi Ilr 1: avi U,ir17 u le .A111111:I • I ... 7.---'4:-'...".. w .—___-�I ulna : 1 :. '-- _ '4:- %V :%/ILT.u.1 i/•.'......Ixlll�lx■ E 1, 1.1":--1:' _. �./ •II'ilI1� tib • = \ 1t ,>� Ulfi- �P ■Iul■n■ 11111111111 _ .v" numr . ummil11 —, ■111■■�IIiIINI1= ,T �"•'... uxu�■I...... 7�II11■1111 1 J[ - :aftlllltll.1l■I■■1 unununnunauuu - - 3:. �` ,sr IIIIIIII •q■NII uuueuuuuuu�u. 1111p►‘.` 2 i ® m.. 111111111111111111 o '= /` `` W Lr ./ ""ac w/Np = Sugden • STgR > Regional • bl/ Park alk 4 p's:iiTT---r-i--)I �0 cot• mammal., , �. • !" H miitantl U L•yy6c• ,•..:: �,� �lil■11111 :� rk..' 3Ji t ■111W THOM�ON �', tic 1 • HIhllt111stlllllxiii '7,a: - ulrr▪! i''�� . i � � 'IIIIIII I■Imlllllix --'�-" / V 4; / zo w KAREN DR° '?�_r'. \, .-k•.� Nap n a �. � �'r Q Botanic . :-' ` . ..Ni. # � s rl a 1 . i- _ 4,Gar`den• 1 • -- itu ▪ i-.Jar f Bayview .1RII 3 �' .- ■■Iltlllll■x111 1111■\®�■ j.L Y r a .- Park 3.., • s, 9 1!•• .. .: a ,nnaulic 13 r,_=____-_,,,:7-._i_ '•J!:,_:Yc UL[ _ y 111111111111■■ ill :-_•: j `, saJ. ..:•. .._.ice-.«_•._.. . REWS AVE' ` _ J Iu: ND r Parcel ',c1/5'...::::..--,,:;*: • 11x.1 MlNnmgn 'L r property * ,; = IIgH 13111 i1fA11111..44 '= :=?.. CRA Boundary r # .' 3.11.- !• y ,i• °"- Ut OIIIIIIIIIIHI auw:`':' , i .,_;. pp • ands " - o niiivi mir ---,al• i r _ r.:Wetlands al a\lu.:�_. ... :i' �, t._...:__: CJ City of Naples - k. _- �..._.. ....._.hilt.:::_:',•�:. .: ... •-r••... .... _: vl�i iii=.:lt. .:.::.7.:F2-4(.-....:".71:, Mie ` vlu t• "-UI[t .__.•,••_._ * _ vlu 6lc Map 5-3-7: Design Treatments&Attributes Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-25 9A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS , 5.3.3 Public Space, Parks, Objective 1: Increase access to parks and public gathering places in the CRA area. & Open Space • Strategy 1:Coordinate with Collier County Road l'`+ Public space, parks, and open space types of land use Maintenance Division and Parks& Recreation that serve an important community-building purpose Division to increase the number and quality of with particular design considerations given the variety bicycle and pedestrian connections 1) between of activity they can support.This section focuses on the Bayshore Dr area and neighboring County how to ensure accessible,activated,and well- parks, including Bayview Park, East Naples maintained public spaces, parks,and open space. Community Park, and Sugden Regional Park and 2) running north/south from neighboring County parks to increase accessibility to the Triangle area C.) GOAL (see Section 5.3.5, Objective 1, Strategy 6). rt • Strategy 2:Coordinate with Collier County Road ,. Ensure accessible, activated,and well-maintained Maintenance Division and Parks& Recreation public spaces,parks,and open space. Division in conjunction with Thomasson Ave and Hamilton Ave MSTU improvements to evaluate opportunities for 1) maintaining car and boat parking at Bayview Park and 2)operational maintenance at Bayview Park. 4 -C • Strategy 3:Coordinate with Collier County Public Services Department to evaluate opportunities for d. ;. a park and/or public meeting space (e.g., library) h 1 in the CRA area. • Strategy 4:Create a site-specific park plan for the existing retention pond in the Triangle area. �4 • Strategy 5: Evaluate opportunities for"pocket --2 'C parks" (very small neighborhood park spaces). ' " : • Strategy 6:Coordinate with Collier County Parks& 404, ' �'=rt e `` Recreation Division on any general parks - improvements related to CRA development/ X= redevelopment sites and efforts, including the 17- Acre Site(see Section 5.3.4). z Pedestrian connection between Bayshore neighborhood and Sugden Regional Park that can serve as an example for additional connections Objective 2: Support events in park spaces geared towards the CRA community. , • Strategy 1:Coordinate with Collier County Parks& Recreation Division to promote park spaces as -- *kms venues for CRA community events. 5-3-26 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 y' V •:OOaOOetCOPOOO.OOOeCOCOCOOOOCCOOOCC*•OOOOOO.O•eOaeaeees 0 . RECOMMENDATIONS Park and Connectivity Design .irig il Concepts , , } a,� , The potential park design concept '� J ` shown in Figure 5-3-4 for the Triangle 7!_, stormwater retention pond is based on :,, « . previous planning and design efforts for ' r �� the pond,with more consideration 41 -A A - given to increasing visibility to enhance Y i11e; ` safety in the pond area (a concern ..y mentioned during public outreach). '.' ! - The rendering includes a consideration for identifying sites for consolidated t public parking,which may take the form41*' - of a garage. irT y �4 4� GATE WAY TRIANGLE PATH • �°`" re3 .,, 1 .i . 4- '' *. r N 0 XiP O * i „‘„,-,74.4i ✓, *2 Tra tE ▪ Pa0n4ir+Brfdpe 9 t ▪ Pienie Area x ”' t i c 4 � c 3_ Potential POYlnq 7 ,. D; a� ' ti Falun Part :,:::::: * < $3i +sem",0 Ne ! - s No NI- - 5 ! 31,:,,dlWt „ . 1 : « '''''''''.'' ilii., \lics *ttPvfA ,,.. .,orokk., . „ ",, , „ ,,.. , ,, ' slit- ' - i to j=� i 3 0841 k AERIAL PLAN ,g,-,--,' colt, Gateway Tem**Pa" Tindale<OIiveC Count?' V3V418 Resign \ Count?' .rte....►.... Figure 5-3-4:Potential Triangle Storm water Pond Design Concept tf e a Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-27 9A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS EXISTINGCONDITIONS ......................�e......�...es....e.........s.a The Redevelopment Area Plan e idparks dcommunity , oppoparks and capitalizing on opporturtunitiesupdattoprocess build a senseentified of placeanandopen community.spacesas Parkimportant accesscocan be improved by , providing better connections toopportunities for new parks(such as at the Triangleassetsretention providing event spaces and pond and small pocket parks). Expansion of the CRA area to include the parks to the east should also be evaluated since it may facilitate making connections and other improvements.See Map 5-3-8 for existing parks and opportunities. 2 'Cs d • % Vii ; ! a Sugden Regional Park:County park that provides inland water access East Naples Community Pork:County park that houses 38 pickleball courts for and water retreat on programming.Image source:Collier County sports tourism and local recreational use;hosts the annual US Open Pickleball Championship and other pickleball tournaments.Image source:Collier Parks&Recreation Division County Parks&Retreat on Division "a. ',-y rr66_,°'eu ` r a e _, gra. .' is Bayview . and the Gulf of MexPark:County park that providesicoaccess to Haldeman Creek, g over Noples220,Botanical000visitors Gardenper year.:anonAlso-profit 170cludes acremeet botanicalng gardenspaces. with the local canals, in . 7 6.',',4*,!;.:6 ' h '„ ilak ',:.i t'16,,,,6 666::4'i.661,',4,-..#14r..4g . 41 �` ' t ori` rw�r� Haldeman Creek and Canals:provide access to the Bayshore Drive pork Opportunity, atStormwater Pond:potential for design,traffic funds periodic dredging and maintenance. 5-3-28 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 1Iii ' I l _ 111 11111, , N Vii i I I l �H DAVIS_BLVD immix— 1. A �.._ �111�- tlrI�VJI_ - � � i KIRK-WOOD-',VE I rr--- n mnunm■m� \ <- t .1 LINWOOD=AVE Ills zZII I1III I� i��10 -----i - I -V',711110'■F:77,,,:ill. _�,itlll III I hill .. .- @iv V. au■ : --11111 J in 111 A cc ,. .Z-1i mum .,_� 111' , nil, .__ �4 X447- iI < ii. . gin -, _� T 1.6 a ir i , i :: iii is 41111...., •4 { _ 1 . ..... ail ili III nap Ng• 111 r r 0 \ Li. / ..... •s " 4 ''°',', 1 -r'�- 1111 • 41 i /rt.), ; 1 1 nannun. im. = \ \✓ '1"...7.4... • / C '5% V - 44 Inn 'd,.. e51 1 I _. for-7' :ri tit - ...''S''. - in■I•n■ IIII HL' -< rte, BARRETT'AVE �' w � Ia�u„„ I■I�lu - ;: -- ■//1111111■Illllilu t ! _ / V �r �P� \ /111■/■11■111111= - , �: 1i11■I■u■111111■. IIIIIIIIIII■11■1■�1 1 i nu 1 u�,., _.[__.._ .. .. �S- x�-, 11111111aaliNN111 • ._,_, awulm -� ii"lI ? " 0 4 .rt.1912 pIII i \,,,,„/ _ I�_AMU♦1�;� r�, MUUMUU 91� r ', IIIIu111111111111111 '''''':'''4:„ `' a, +,�{ p 1 v, C/ STAR _.� �nuuullulillll■■ �' \B IIS9PU1111111U1,1! 1:.:J nNn r f i' ____ \ t . � aii �,_, ■[ 1�ni{riuu _ vlu ; yi ��aTHOMASSON DR ., 4 11/11111 ~\ .:•.:.',....g. ¢ unuunnmm n , -- �,z. z nnnumnu■uw ?'‘N.", .,,' O KAREN DR° 1 - I— u a� % - Na es , �T7; 31 ck - / / �� A Bayvite Paiew_,.., ■III■IIIIOIIIIIII. �", II I;Oulul .: ._ `I//1111isiiii1_ ■1■11. 1!1'■ w ? '. ,' 1 17...„:.........44.....4,..:•:4§4: :.^--Qlt! SSI. ■it :i111911111iti i 7 : :::: •r 11111111111111 �Ill� i lt,s- ..�•' .:',:: ::":::-42--":::::7 .:. .. :> r __....:. Nim , - 'ala- - ANDREWS-AVE r:_,ala,:::: I I Property Parcel :•-,.,..-7.,.ltr I t vltr.., • q' 3111-.:'I'1J/ _.a • :IHIuuII iiI I tll _: D CRA Boundary �_ -;:`2•:•: ..:.::"U '• ytju 'all? Park etc ' ! 1 7111111111/Ills u 1-`" ..-t.,.4::::". ,1. :ilu $ ..I 7.7 '- adu -.:: -.Wetlands i 111 � tt . :: it .j� i.._._.-4.f:::::. I [J City of Naples _ Calc 1 � -I,fi :.:r._. 1 1 .. :.. sl :72 i fele 1..... lu r la1 5;,. Calc sauA /saw v1M lr * *N .::ialtr _:alv.i-t.••:, .1.;*:;..::: .__,.,,: _,-.. , NU[c.._._ ._.uVi''''''.-4l' ':F_ '.. Map 5-3-8: Parks&Open Space Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-29 ° 9A 5.3 y PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 3: Ensure a clean and well maintained public realm. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with the Collier County Sheriff's Office, Collier County Code Enforcement Division, service providers in the CRA area, and residents and business owners in the CRA area to develop a proactive community safety and clean-up strategy(inclusive of private property along the canal network) with an aim at reducing reliance on case-by-case enforcement.This effort should focus on residential properties and coordinate with the Community Standards Liaison pilot program of the Collier County Community& Human Services Division. • Strategy 2: Identify and document a strategy for canal maintenance in the right-of way, including seawalls and mangroves, in coordination with the Haldeman Creek MSTU Advisory Board. Table 5-3-1 indicates the amount of parks and open space that are in and bordering the CRA area. Designation Location Acreage Estimate Total publicly-owned £' open space within CRA Retention pond site 6.48 (northern Triangle area) (includes pond) area Additional open space orBotanical Garden green space in the CRA 168 (non-profit owned) area Total open space/green 174.48 space in CRA area • Bayview Park 6.27 Park space adjacent to • East Naples Community Park 120 CRA area • Sugden Regional Park 173.27 Total park,open,or green space within or 347.75 adjacent to CRA area Table 5-3-1:Amount of Parks and Open Space. Source:2017 Florida Department of Revenue and Google Earth calculation c, 5-3-30 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 4A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3A Development Development and redevelopment can improve the quality and aesthetics of the built environment, as well as generate tax revenue and benefits to property owners through increased property values.This development and redevelopment activity also needs to include protections for existing community members who may face burdens from the increase in property values, such as increased costs for renters.This section provides an approach to foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability and prosperity for community members.Also documented are more specific planning and visioning efforts for two key development opportunities, at the Mini Triangle and 17-Acre sites. Q GOAL i Foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability and prosperity for community members. , i.1-4„•41.4.1.1.,#414.1.4114.*4,44,414 4-.!-4.t4 4-4144.41,411.l-41,-A...h*.i.4-4_i Ili-4.-i 41.1I a ' 4"041f'. Y ,' ” 11 li v°y, 0,_ , Mini Triangle site rendering excerpt;Source:Zyscovich Architects Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-31 9A ii 5.3;`'I PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS i 1 l Objective 1: Improve the marketing, • Consider prior arts and culture planning efforts, such as those related to the Bayshore Cultural branding, and communication approach for District(Resolution No 2008-60). the CRA area. • Incorporate an inventory of existing artistic and • Strategy 1:Create a branding strategy for the CRA cultural features of the community to elevate. area to establish a community vision and • Include a comprehensive public realm design character.This strategy should coordinate with approach for the CRA area and sub-areas (see the Arts and Culture Plan and the Market Study Section 5.3.2, Objective 3, Strategy 1). for the CRA(see Section 5.3.4, Objective 1, • Consider housing needs and economic incentives Strategy 5 and Section 5.3.4, Objective 3, Strategy related to arts and culture-oriented development 1). (see Section 5.3.4, Objectives 3 and 5). • Include administrative needs of implementing the • Strategy 2: Create a marketing and plan (e.g., an arts committee, additional staff). communication strategy for the CRA area to • Coordinate with countywide arts and culture communicate vision and character with effective strategic planning efforts. tools (e.g., website, social media, branding materials).This strategy should coordinate with the comprehensive design approach developed for the CRA area (see Section 5.3.2, Objective 3, Strategy 1), as well as improved communication efforts between the CRA and the community(see Section 5.3.7, Objective 1). • Strategy 3: Provide CRA administrative materials (e.g.,Advisory Board agendas, budgets, annual reports) in an accessible and easy-to-understand way. i • Strategy 4:Coordinate with the Collier County Tourist Development Council, Collier County Parks & Recreation Division, and other jurisdictions to promote the CRA area and its local business and commercial establishments as part of tourism development efforts in the area.This should include coordination with Collier County Parks& Recreation related to East Naples Community Park master planning and pickleball sports tourism. • Strategy 5: Create an Arts and Culture Plan for the CRA area to incorporate into the overall CRA area vision.This effort should: 5-3-32 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS '. 5.3 Objective 2: Streamline and clarify the [� � � � m _ development process1,1k, , r ,sirr 3 ,01► .-, ___L____ _ __ &, ., _. • Strategy 1:Coordinate with Collier County Zonings Division to clarify LDC requirements related to development in the CRA area, particularly related to: ' •.'ts � �c4 1,;-1t. >t „. ' • Relationship of overlay zoning to base g _ > . zoning ” R . _11- �;, • Relationship of various applicable codes to f k each other(e.g., LDC,fire code, building ; code) • Allowable uses US Open Pickleball Championships at East Naples Community Park. • Strategy 2:Coordinate with Collier County Zoning Source:Collier County Parks&Recreation Division,https:// . www.facebook.com/CollierParks/photos/ R Division to evaluate approaches to streamline and 0.852037184807466 1073741827.118036328207559/19606389606 A 13944/?type=3&theater shorten the development review process. Approaches might include: o • Dedicating County staff to review projects within the CRA area and expedite themN. through the development process. 1 . • Improving coordination and communication 11, ., between entities overseeing applicable '1 �< Nap _- --ieS a 1 _ - codes (e.g., Zoning, Fire Marshall). ,f1:1, ' i • Identifying opportunities to increase , if reliance on defined criteria for development1 approval (as opposed to discretionary .,. '". . approval) 1 • Encouraging design-build approaches. Existing artistic features,such as murals,should be considered in the Arts and Culture Plan • Strategy 3: Establish a formal role for the CRA in the development review process to facilitate — development of projects in the CRA area. . Alt ....:_:,...,,...„2-',',_-;j----.""._ P a:, Clearer LDC guidance would help new uses such as microbreweries ^« ° Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 ,. 5-3-33 9A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS imHI Objective 3: Incentivize desired types of Objective 4: Capitalize on current and potential real estate and development development. opportunities. e • Strategy 1: Conduct a market study, including information on owners of second homes,which is • Strategy 1: Facilitate tenancy, development, and not captured in typical data sets, to determine redevelopment, particularly for opportunities si what development will be supported in the CRA along US 41, Linwood Ave and neighboring non residential areas, and Bayshore Dr,through area. incentives and communication efforts (see • Strategy 2: Identify incentives and targeted Development Assistance and Incentives assistance (see Development Assistance and Examples). Incentives Examples)for a range of development and redevelopment, including consideration of • Strategy 2: Continue to facilitate existing catalyst the following types of development and additional project opportunities on the Mini Triangle and 17 desirable development supported by the market Acre sites(see Map 5-3-10)to strengthen and stud Y: solidify development interest in the CRA area. Efforts might include assisting with coordination • Local neighborhood commercial of property owners in target areas, negotiating establishments desired amenities to be incorporated into • Social enterprises and business proposed development, and providing incentives opportunities for those with tenuous (see Development Assistance and Incentives livelihoods Examples). • Larger catalyst development projects • Arts oriented development • Strategy 3: Evaluate alternative funding opportunities, such as private funding and • Strategy 3: Evaluate and amend as needed current donations,for capital projects. grant program offerings to reflect new incentives and assistance approaches from Section 5.3.4, • Strategy 4:Assess development opportunities for Objective 3, Strategy 2. the Activity Center area, including the Courthouse Shadows site. • Strategy 5: Evaluate concepts to expand the CRA boundaries. Considerations might include the incorporation of new development opportunities, such as areas along Thomasson Drive, and the incorporation of County parks. 5-3-34 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Development Assistance and Incentives Examples among the Bayshore Drive businesses, the Mini • Density/intensity increases Triangle are property owners, and the property =` • Impact fee offsets or payment over time owners along Linwood Avenue and Kirkwood • TIF rebates and TIF money for infrastructure Avenue. • Land acquisition through CRA for targeted needs, such as parking and stormwater infrastructure, and to facilitate redevelopment • Tenant attraction and relocation support • Micro-enterprise incubator and technical assistance support in partnership with other local entities Potential Partnership Opportunities for Micro-Enterprise Incubator Incubators can provide workspace and assistance to micro-enterprises, particularly small businesses, looking to get their start in the CRA area.The CRA could potentially partner with existing efforts or collaborate on new efforts to support the work of incubators. For example,the Naples Accelerator (https://naplesaccelerator.com/) provides office space and amenities and connections to local economic resources to assist its member businesses.There may also be interest from other local entities, such as St. Matthew's House, in partnering to start a new incubator. Such partnerships can bring together organizations to pool capacity and funding to carry out incubator efforts and can also be used to support artists and arts-oriented development, a key aspect of the CRA's vision. Other Partnership Opportunities:Business Associations The CRA encourages businesses operating in the area to f, form associations and business districts to coordinate development efforts and potential funding tools such as MSTUs.Such associations can also serve as important partners to the CRA in its implementation of �ro development assistance and incentives. Areas where these associations might be particularly beneficial are Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-35 3 35 1111111111111111111111111111111111•1111- -11111111111111P, 5.3 I PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Development and Redevelopment Potential Figure 5-3-5 provides a general indication of the development opportunities in the CRA area, showing vacant land acreage and the corresponding number of vacant parcels by land use type that could potentially be developed and indicating that most of the vacant acreage is residential. Map 5-3-9 indicates where these parcels are located. As the map indicates, the parcel sizes can run fairly small, so assembly may be a consideration for developers.The background analysis for the Redevelopment Area Plan also indicates a sizable number of parcels with structures, • particularly single-family and mobile homes, that might benefit from upgrades to improve their structural condition.These efforts should take into account any potential increases in prices and costs when units are upgraded to avoid pricing out residents who find the new price and cost points unaffordable. 1 109 acres (389 parcels) Total Vacant Acreage: 186 ,- 41 acres ti (62 parcels) 36 acres* (4 parcels) J4 0 acres 0 acres Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Governmental Figure 5-3-5:Vacant Land Acreage Distribution by Land Use Type. 1. *Note:A 32.5-acre parcel northwest of the Bayshore/Thomasson intersection is coded as Vacant Institutional but is owned by Mattamy Naples LLC.(Source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue) :a, 1 v a 1, 1 5-3-36 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 1 9 il': 1 , 1.3— -- PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS , 5 .........,__ .... .,‘„„,,,, .. MII I I 0r!. 1.' N IIIMI illral I. No aa IMMO nq -4'' -- ill --- ---7---- A - - ix 111111.111 liAil 1 iiiimm.„ •.. , - IIN• iniztsrinArt astir • ,_ k,,,, r, - ,,,,:w1tr64,0,-,4,411.,..11-•LINWOODAVE i"nr's Clz illifgialliiiiiiiiiiiiiittilliZ IIIII— - ' ' 1' Ill' '' ,,•••7.•:::;''''',.' ' 4 ?„ 'sal: L eir 'sdatitit,u*,,,,,..:f 1...1 4111111111!HIN:11 ' EN I'''',Viiiii*Sfir-IN 5 In Juin P-- i miler 4,4%,`.4, );iiiikirR1111 IP !.. _ NMI l- -•N94.1 .'''- •••• $.404',•,- 'IIIII1111i1--k. 0 takl ., I 4,0 14,/ „„illiliill Ell 0 , ni WM -'' 6uez . ...2.. M II .,- I -- 4 [.. ...11 NI ''... 2 1....w•g.- .: - , . , - I is 2=rn11 Bo . ....in lw ini ni"s. . iir , ,.4. I ...a ,iii: • 4* .. I - .. ----,ImmiLl•ll IllIti 1.. •1111111 it II_ ,.. , - ..17 `79 i '.' ... • ---1•7 "1 ' •,(7.711 f , It:: * "•,. 1 ..:' .,.1 -,4; ,: ' .. ' •r44‘,.."1 LIS= % .'. / -.,1.. : 61 ..r .. ...3.',. . .,4, .Q,„:\ „ ,, ' ..-- . , --t---'-' iiLii .:-i_I , .. _ I' ' ..] Li.i.z.-.-...4y 7.1 -- ---,-yi'i,:i'),,,ii,,-,---- ii,_..- ,.4 ,/ - - -• : ' 4 LLI E ';;---i."'.----.2,- - ,, ' I K.., u ,- . ':ILI"RiliirLi l 1 , 1 \ ailing ,1 \''. iiisimn '-,--, , _ 1 1 •„,_._-----„..,...,-----4,.. 14./ . -\'' , BARRETT-AVE- Iii, A 1____/ :., ---:-: -,'---7' meuelilittleiriliiinius.,'- ' 1 t ) f----,-,\), Str -- t 11...eale., .— . , W • Hig ilstanimmi Ulniplifilil- 1 Inittrutifsinoj1$1141.1111111r10 • ..i.'-'.., ":" '.' .-' ' ' a-' 61,itP.,„ tatittiiinnattilta cc lamas allletea -- -`fi..1.' ".:,-,:r P. •`.' .•':',,,, t''',-, 1-11111:11,Ill172-0?-1S,17,#•-ii" ' ...--- s , ..:,:.• 111111111 111111 ,', ----'-', ....:' cc. ,k -:i_i:', / , .. i vl..,... .•.: , •>"11.- .i.,..''. .--- ,--- \ .. \ "k8,. --------• C° nt/111i1Mt II. ---' *.0; fillinir kVb00141111.15. • - --------., ,..",•,•._.' _ " - IIIIIIIIIIiii IP,x i Hits .,.. ..,-. /r IrAirt:/.101 11111 \ . 'W'',',‘,',,I,',-,,V,,,:',.,v r al ar,T-',-'2,11111,usi.tm I 7-*".t.N..114,.., At'''.."":4::1,0:9ele ''''.'"-"*.. •,- .' " 1141--;:: iil-,) 4 t__ •. . __... .:_ •. ,.. _ • •-• . ,•,. ••• ••-,11..,„•,„1.1„,,,,„....,....„._ i. . •,, •_\ .1.1 :lei arm, , . - . i -"-1;'. ,,,,-e sy f;:l . i , . "-7-1- ' • i it- r . ---,- _-:I ,-, ' L'''',.-""! "..,' k. t- ----" - THO •SSONI DR'- > ..r.,, - ''' Li : • 111111011 ""....., i ..;. ..:.." ,,•Eill11-11111111111111ilnlini „, :2::41111K.,71'± :; ''''''''''' Mi...1:11111:111i:1111:i .:''”'-all' . 11 :-Y* \ . - ,.. ' KAREN DR .,. \It'? ,, •, ..7., ..,i1 ' .. ,i, . . ,,,, rall,t'LD- ...._.''•:.1 ,., .. , . ,._., 1,,2,,,, ',0,1,,,Ve-4,-t., r A1.4;t:.....4'• 'qIi -pi 'sy''"-•••• '-•'" < .6f.j0)., ,,,,,,-4,, r-, .A' .,. - i--4... L j CRA Boundary ", 10,-......tr-Ttr. -. . ....,... 17i..,y; Property Parcels Bayview- I ,--J,1-zw '4,,-z,W,t ;,,,,, I l Mil ,... •.. .--- ... ,... ---,-, , '',4•':• ' ummilllEgitill I ".7:i- .....-,,...f::::,,g.-... L ..,Non-Vacant Parcel ,,Ite....., Park ) '-4-Y..-"IL-a '.- ., MI= '" • tf*. '''k.'''.4 Vacant Parcels I - - -' `1'--... "--,*: i ..' '?4,..:7:::-;.':i: 1"""Hilliii"1" El Vacant Residential .'',,,k,. :Al,:1.'..1 if.;". .,14.-.':.....,-,-4 ke, . --; ;O1*-4444414NDREWS-AVE*-:-...-::...40:-..4:-21,1-72:1-',..;1LIII Vacant Commercial ' --- ''''' -.1-!,7,-;,.*: Vacant Institutional • ...% -..' i . ::.:,...2-."-.',--..• .-:::: ...:,,,..--. inisautitqftrit. ,..„,.-,,,.r-....--....--7..r.,..,*.-- 1111 .'„ ,, - . * ',Ak " ::-4e':.,.41•.-1 "."4,Wetlands '''''''''''''•'1 ,,„. st-1:*_,,:•,47.- • In11111tillintenteen''-."...,,,,- ,.,,'-.,' ,,. .1......- ,, „_ds.,,,,, :‘,.-- _ , , ,.1.,•:, :::,_:--•; ”'-'''''''' '4 '--' ' _,,-.:••''.w. '' •-z - iortill-lit1011•2'''', '''''''''''_,,':'--'.''7' 1:-.::::-.7.'-‘-:-,-:--- C._]City of Naples '-'1.d.,:'" - `-',1',- '''''??..' it:,•-•' :.,' ",aii.,--7,1-••••_..4.f.'.....7'll .--..'... .-.•::- tee '-- .4 ::'1 Ail?---;'.-- ,..7:-.....:,:' 72,.,_-:9-ir•:i....,,- ' . _ Af.,• ::-..•,,,-. : ':" 1'• -N1t4'.-::::.::Jiiit:.._ • -,,,,16:'''''--.4'...-' ' :::i •'"•44e•'':'''.----,::: 44" - u,.„„_ ..:7 7::;.-ate:7......- .- MMEthilierineldaNnagri.gie ..- ..,7 . i,,,,.. .":*..*..V.W. '... -'..".- . Zr:'"?:-'-. . --,' S3.!. 11,,:',IL..44.: ''''.'''..Vf'1- ' - ..---- , -- - Map 5-3-9:Vacant Land Parcels in CRA Area.Note:Vacant institutional land northwest of Bayshore Dr/Thomasson Dr intersection is coded as Va- cant Institutional but it owned by Mattamy Naples LLC.(Source.. 2017 Florida Department of Revenue) _ ... Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-37 A mi 5.3A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS £ee Development&Real Estate Opportunities The CRA can facilitate development, redevelopment, and tenancy of vacant spaces through incentives and improvements to the surrounding areas. Map 5-3-10 and corresponding images show some of the key opportunities in the CRA area; note that the Mini Triangle site and the 17-Acre Site contain parcels currently owned by the CRA. 1 . M .may ya *� ,,,-.4111....- mow.. t Linwood Avenue commercial corridor redevelopment Courthouse Shadows redevelopment 4 is ;w G ° , V -- ,s Gulfgate Plaza office tenant opportunity Bayshore Drive commercial corridor redevelopment(including Halde- man Creek Entertainment District near Creek) Z v 5 1. -.-:-.7::-.7:,7-.---,=:,,i--, BAIT �`�� E kL E.ga_cpIES 41E11 q�`___E=H0T FQ�R ✓ ¢> aP Del's 24 redevelopment opportunity 5-3-38 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 4 5.3 N � = A ''M VD. �.�.. ` v_ M / M I n I 1 1 LINW00D AVE �� Triangle i L 1 �`"�«„). { 'S nig i ,�. j L Site �i9 !1 1l s - yr '` A,Ai 3 til` ; , r if r 1 H� � ,49 i l a r_ a! w ,¢w Ir , 0 1 �� l SSP z ` Q� BAF z T AVE L. N t r-.,,; 444,441 i J1s j 17-Acre ':f" Sugden } miiiiiiiiiiiliallitfr7 Regional Site Park pc gCl/ .. �G �`� Q 4, .) ;y .; I \ • 1 i T :: i' ITHOMASSON )z I ._ ... O K PEN DR- i �-^-1 Vacant Non-Residential SL_.I I ,. S}� Botanical �s '. +' .Commercial Q 4,,,,.._ Botanicai a - ' Industrial ;p 2 .ns s - i J _;Garden , ;. - r• .Institutional Bayview z ,t Naples Botanical Garden P' ■1 Count Park )r. 1k: :1tA v ! y .. :'.�- tlu. " f_stlz „i;-2,',„' I.: :: }!t.•;�;::_ .State -. s...14.kl _ _..'''J'''' t .,,,:t-,,- l'.11 _ , , ? r;il& Naples _�I.i: '' -^.- ANDREWS AV .."-::,...----74(it.-7.-7: utilityfOther .. s * 0 CRA Boundary J c �. , t ! CPaityrkI .1 G. ! t : - Wetlands nfds. , I b —,. Naples I[.. attt;.: 'Y”"L':_ �..l.G:• :.._al l t< . blt:_Q ".:i.�'.�:Ji't:_•_.:_...:a.lc-.l. aJt.r:r .— illilfligkell f: y_. ] te'� _ ...a • i • . I• 4 !(.(:A ,�, :. ':1-•. , .; ,,..1;-:',1,..._:_:.-.-:;:al ,..4'..1.-.7.fcam.--.- .. .ki - •,it -i . t. v3; t Map 5-3-10:Development&Real Estate Opportunities with Non-Residential Existing Land Use;Data source:2017 Florida Department of Revenue Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-39 g, 5.3 I PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A I fiI Objective 5: Incorporate protections in de- 41) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N velopment efforts to enhance existing °! community character and support existing Collier County Mobile Home Upgrade Program CRA area residents. Collier County Community& Human Services Division • Strategy 1: Establish assistance programs and currently oversees a program that uses State Housing incentives to protect and enhance existing corn- Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) program funds to replace munity-oriented uses and local neighborhood mobile homes with more sturdy single-family modular , commercial and single-family neighborhoods off homes in response to hurricane damage. In Everglades the main corridors.Assistance and incentive dis- City,these homes are elevated on stilts.The Bayshore tribution might account for building age, struc- Gateway Triangle CRA may be able to refine this pro- tural quality, and means of property owners. gram to meet the needs of the community to encour- • Strategy 2: In coordination with the Collier Coun age replacement with a more suitable building type for ty Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, pro- the area. mote strategies to maintain current affordable housing availability in the CRA while improving Residential Renovation&the FEMA 50% Rule baseline quality conditions. Strategies to consider The FEMA 50% Rule requires that any existing building include: within an identified FEMA Flood Zone will have to be upgraded to meet current flood standards if improve- • Community land trust ments are made that are in excess of 50%of the struc- • Coordinating with Collier County Corn- ture value. When determining structure value, only the value of the improvement itself(exclusive of land munity& Human Services Division for p value) mobile home upgrades and is considered. During the building permit review pro- ments with alternative unit types(see replace- cess, the County will require anyone located within a flood zone to go through a review process to ensure Housing Assistance and Incentives Exam- that proposed improvements are not worth in excess of - pies) 50%of the building value. The CRA may consider devel- • Residential renovation loan/grant pro- oping partnerships/grants to assist in replacing struc- gram tures to encourage bringing existing buildings up to i code and maintain affordability. • Encouraging use of Collier County's im- k pact fee deferral program for income- restricted units (see Housing Assistance Impact Fee Deferral for Income-Restricted Units and Incentives Examples) Several cities and counties in Florida, including Collier County, impact offer im act fee incentives for affordable and/ or workforce housing. In Collier County, for-purchase and rental units for households with incomes less than tr 120%of median income in the county qualify for impact fee deferrals. Deferrals are equivalent to up to 3%of the prior year's total impact fee collections, a cap insti- tuted to minimize revenue lost through the program. 5-3-40 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 t PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS9 A ' 4F; The County also limits to 225 the number of rental units receiving deferrals. Impact fees are deferred for owner- occupied units until the owner sells, refinances, or moves out of the home, at which time fees are due with interest. Rental unit fees are deferred for a 10-year pe- riod. Historically,this level of deferral has allowed the program to defer impact fees on approximately 100f homes per year.A pilot program for payment of impact fees by installments collected through property tax bills .. (as an alternative to making the entire payment up- front)was also planned for the Immokalee CRA area. The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA could support or A_ replicate the County's program to defer fees in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area;this approach could also be used to incentivize other types of desired development, as well. i Case Information Source: Tindale Oliver(August 2017),Impact Fee Incen- tives for Affordable/Workforce Housing. it it s., F- '5 t Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 i 5-3-41 9A 5:3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3.5 Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability Having a variety of transportation options that are easy and desirable to use are important for all who live and work in the CRA area.Transportation systems not only cater to local needs between the CRA area and places such as Downtown Naples and local work- places, but also to more regional traffic moving through the CRA area on major roadways. In light of the various needs, this section aims to ensure safety, comfort,and convenience for various modes within and connecting with the CRA area. Cs GOAL Ensure safety, comfort, and convenience for various modes within and connecting with the CRA area. .4, , , • 1esa* ._ I i . . _ 4. dye --.- Kr 5-3-42 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 1: Increase safety, comfort, and elements on,for example, Complete Streets, the Vision Zero effort to eliminate bicycle and connectivity for active transportation modes pedestrian fatalities, and roundabouts. (e.g., walking and biking). • Strategy 5: Based on input from temporary • Strategy 1:Create a strategy to implement discrete installations from Strategy 4, move forward with transportation improvements and more vetting of Bayshore Dr road diet concept scenarios comprehensive Complete Streets corridor and traffic analysis. improvements. • Strategy 6: Evaluate opportunities for a north/ • Strategy 2:The effort undertaken for Strategy 1 south bicycle and pedestrian connector in the should include development of a sidewalk master eastern Bayshore area with connections to Sugden plan with inclusion of the following: Park and East Naples Community Park(see Section • Visibility assessment related to landscaping 5.3.3, Objective 1, Strategy 1). • Consideration of connections to neighboring parks (see Section 5.3.3, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Objective 1, Strategy 1 and Strategy 6 in this section) What are Complete Streets? • Coordination with roadway and Streets that "serve the transportation needs of infrastructure improvements planned and/ transportation system users of all ages and abilities, or approved for implementation, including including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, those that may stem from this motorists, and freight handlers. A transportation Redevelopment Area Planning process or system based on Complete Streets principles can help other agency planning and implementation to promote safety, quality of life, and economic efforts (e.g., County and CRA stormwater development."-FDOT, Completing Florida's Streets, master planning). http://www.ficompletestreets.com/files/FDOT- • Strategy 3: Identify opportunities to coordinate CompleteStreets-Brochure.pdf transportation capital improvements with County/ MPO improvements along major arterials. • Strategy 4: Pilot transportation improvements, such as elements of Complete Streets corridor improvements, elements of Bayshore Dr road diet (traffic lane consolidation), reduced turning radii at intersections to slow traffic, and additional pedestrian crossings, with temporary installations. These efforts should incorporate community input and feedback to gauge response to more urban- style development and any particular concerns to address or opportunities on which to capitalize. These installations can be incorporated into community events that include educational Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-43 9A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......»........®..00e.................................. Existing Transportation Conditions Map 5-3-11 highlights existing transportation conditions identified by fieldwork. Roadways in the CRA area range from large arterials carrying regional traffic to small neighborhood streets,many of which dead-end throughout the CRA area.During fieldwork,cyclists were noted on the sidewalks of larger arterials such as Davis Boulevard and Airport Pulling Road,and many bikes were parked at Gulfgate Plaza off of US 41.The MPO and FDOT also identified Airport Pulling Road and US 41 as high bike/pedestrian crash corridors.Relative to other streets,Bayshore Drive has a number of improvements,including bike lanes,sidewalks,and transit shelters,yet it still experiences a lack of parking.There are limited pedestrian connections to parks from streets off Bayshore Drive;one connection is at Republic Drive.Note that these existing conditions are a general,preliminary assessment,with more detailed measures of existing conditions such as trip counts and traffic modeling anticipated as part of follow-up strategy–and project-specific evaluation prior to a decision to implement. 1 . Divided arterial with street fronting parking Cyclist on sidewalk of arterial 4 13,, p py•ta .. . w w' m , A 1 t f a[ ( tet. "t 4' Bayshore Drive with sidewalks and bike lanes Bus shelter at Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive 5 ,R 6 mizt 1 $ . > 3 ', i" `,� - - - y iY , w . __ - - -- . y� i Dead-end neighborhood street Pedestrian bridge to East Naples Community Park 5-3-44 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9 , q PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS .. 5.3 .., ....,., ,,.:-..., . . ., .....1 N I I : .,, _..... A , —... DAVISIBLIVID i. 9-1 KIRKWOOD AyE 1 . , 2 ,-----i- :I"...t.,..m.„..._„.. .,.., , ......,.. LI ca .......___...J, • 7 464 LINWOOD-AVE ± 1---- 6 < I - ,,........,..-,- - . . — a- r 1 0 0 .4(1...,•... ;— , --L-. I "-'1.4•1 II , < = /4cc 14.,4 \ I ,,,p, v., ,.._ .7c : 1 ' ''\"-/' IT''''''' I e ,- 1 -J „ 0.... Il . .,. 5 ........., , 2t4gr I', .'"'.I. `1'.--;•t: - ii ‘S' ..,- 3 I I I l',\ / \.-• BAR R ETT-AVE---- i \ \ ! -...:44,•' '',.:1 •i="" 4 , -::I -:...: .c. .Z... I , , I F.2 I -..?, Li cc 1 ... 4 i egioSugd ''''4en \ $- ,i`44, ,\'',l.,' -----N,\ 11 li 1111 1' ..- 4 ':::....... A THOMASSON DR \, S / -'<10 ,_!,- aa East taless4-j, _ „ Npes: „ __. : ,_ ' 3otnkal . 6 communft -- Roadway Classi f--,c., ati on i .., ,...4., .,,„. .... Garden , ''''''.--Park,,” :-'4 PsomiHighway -..,. - _ .., • .,.,..,.•• ego Major Arterial •- Baytnew 7..,,,,:t '' '''!,!..;. .'..- '"., s-.....1, , .--- --r .:.. •. .....Minor Arterial I A& '-::- -- .."M N),kf-.'"''.4:6(•..'1' ..-- -44".:."----1 —Collector -,st..,- .1 1-es,,-...;....:sale:......-- ,4i-i,,-. le AV:7.1---..'''' •-- ..' — Other ' -- ;1,- -'''-l',JE s.::.:_s_-:.7,j-fie.7::.'.".4.s:-- 1'4...7: .-7;• AN D R EWS-AVt.,:',7,:::.*,..,E,......;',1,.::: 1 ..." 14/./14"::-::-`),-11,; ..•.-.."'"'':::*Lk ?'......:: ..'-'.::.41e..1.-.::''' "..4.4,1:-(.*:..:,',....,..." 0 CRA Boundary ._ .,-;:-..,. -4:::,,,--. .....*:....f.:.:±.-:-,41_-...;1, r,-- .::::: :',,,k--.-:-.. Park .''. q.c.f.-:-.:-.-..:...,t*f.r.-*..-**:.-!-::::-.Alef',-*.. w - .i Wetlands ....,..4e•':' ::.:;:'.:.. ..,.::::::::.. . , .,.,.,,..i,,.-„„:.._„.,,,,,:ii.,..4....-.., . :________......:.04, .*...::.:: ._,:„.„.....s.,0i4,.........„,...,,,,_.. _ -Al2::...-L.'4k 2.--. .77...-...i:;:.4:‘''.-;I:.:.: - -•::- ..- ::::44.:0.;4::'-••"•;:,,*:: . -:--11:- .. .&.:.:::--,,, .:L:.:::::;i..*:::::::-.;-,; ....i::.7.ii--'Av.:.:...:1::-;:i; . . ... ZiEdidieraiMitiNEEN Mile 7.7:7::.:ge.: !,.L ,..gfio 7.......-A.q.:.',....".4 Re- 4..-.4,?. :-.::-.4e-:--' ' ..:-'-',..-1.tte-'-•,.:a.s"-sk ,.t.:......)....... .:.:,-,-,.-',.4.ii N)f. -1:'..1:::::.f::-:- ...::. .- ,,I,.;,y..4:,.,:.:.:,„,::,-:.-..-4,,,...ys.,:.,i.':.-':',.,---- _-, Map 5-3-11: Existing Transportation Conditions with Roadway Classifications .... ' .., Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 / 5-3-45 9A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS I +R ExisTINGc ONDmoN a•®s•+e+o +ee..• Fieldwork,discussions with CRA staff,public outreach,and specific project recommendations from the 2018 Blue Zones Project/Dan Burden East Naples Discovery Report informed location-specific,discrete transportation needs and considerations in the CRA area (Map 5-3-12). Many of these needs and considerations will be addressed through Complete Streets projects recommended in this Redevelopment Area Plan.Other transportation improvements such as addressing sidewalk and bike infrastructure gaps,providing parking infrastructure,and providing wayfinding signs will be addressed through separate project recommendations. Note that"Major Corridors"are designated based on $ highways, minor arterials,and major arterials in the area. "Needs Corridors"are designated where needs identified are e generalized along the length of a roadway segment(related needs are those where labels intersect the corridor on Map 5-3-12). Bicycle&Pedestrian Traffic Curb extensions Traffic circulation along corridor, including 101 intersections 0 General bike accessibility 410 Traffic calming Pedestrian crossing(s) 0 Connect street 4 Bike lanes General connectivity, walkability Parking 6 North/south connectivity Commercial parking East/west connectivity Parking including boat parking 8 Sidewalk(s) 9 Wayfinding 10 Lighting Road diet(lane reduction) Major Corridor ■ ■ ■ ■ Needs Corridor 5-3-46 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9 A ' PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ,..';,'--5.3 1„ _X, , , mmie, , in Er-- ,,,. iu_ -..,. , N t--Mirlilr 1 2 DAVIS BLVD in ,./ril . . . ... )11, . . ,, 3t�o® 'r Ai I U ggi.ggi, • I t-P "Ir 11"1000- . 1 411, 4 8 1 1 1 „- U E. A Fl .br edwillik. Y1111111111111 - d. .1i11111.1.Illffill co,II .,. Ill 1....1 =1 , . , 1-- - 2 Miligh, „ ilbt 19 5 • =, 2 inffir1/4. 2.,„ el ttmiluild til )\ 3 .,,,c- •-,,,,,, 4% , I Le. ''' 1 .1 D ' i: tte01:4;!:•...••::.:•• .9 -1i: 44c: • Awe/ . L.......„ * ei,,,-,'ATY•.r 11. ars,.-., ii---Nr -.Ns - 2 (/ I .- ,., . , ... I I 1 • • -p ll j 11'a"...'...-.7,..itos-•, m„,•\ Ii 1I, -.- rA r. 2 \ 1e 1 ) 11 . \ .11Ai 1 f I , ..._. , ,t-4411.,,,2;2 1 .41 et,i el / t l''• s•,!. ctlft...-4/4 i tee- -.1g . ._!". ii,. r- 7/ I 4111 F'g''''-• 4. .4111111 jail 2 ,,... , now ,............, I \ --, 1..likigiii. 1 .., ..),:: 5 -......,::. ...-.:--- EFEragg 4 misionsirm : f i . , , N, , , 4k: S. N'',,r- . musisiiiin I l''6 I 4 -- , — immananh,, 41111115111111- ' . / /fr „ t ,., „:-., , ,„,..,.. 11,16,,,,, .,.., 6..uulmr,llme, 1 S'›/ --.7-' mitithr IITI:cc im”, V..=itg I ,, ,--„„- '':'" -'.TilliliraffilliriTh\r ”''''' '''' =71 *tit;gi 111 \ L.-- _ „ ....! 1/46-s---71'-, -, = - ,-.,.uciaing.„-7-. .::-..--'2'-;-:_] \ C,3 --.„....- rn----,_„._,V84' ' - n iiii,-.11= 7 .,,„:,., , ig. si- — - 0 ‘ sum........., ,,,. - ......., ....„ .# , \ ,•11(-, '7-7 '-21 ..ici :: Illn alai fr, ' ;"=•'-,•: 1- , +i il-!-211 ti , I 1 i .-...:- \ ; , ,, J, ,_— PIIIIMIlr ' 1 H 1 •14... . .'- is _...., r 1 I .11.,111,11.,.. 941%"rig 7 ___ . ,,,,,,, -,.......„ 1, ...,-- ,- , 'MASSON DR 111111111115-41111 ) ; \\ " -' -Ask --_:::•).:Lf.:: -- - 161111111111111111111111111 .-: ..--,, mg ▪ 5--":.;`'Ci I'' Eq; INN1-miiiimiatafflaiii / ., •:-ki .11'1 I't:. -I4•::,.- ;_,* . ,.. - AF-EN DR it II II . .:: .' --- r 49.1.,NPoi, '4;-eati, :r..NItg...,:s.,_-. •,-.:..........F:.:. --,A.,,,...•-•-.7..:,-..„..-''! , Garden iff4 41116% 't . .;I:fe....it.,:-- '-,)$ .•-••••,::."It•*•:::::17..'"''''',.,t.:::-::;ee'r-:-• 1,' 111,11 MI Bayv,ew'2- : ,71q.,7_ ...,,,1 1 .:,;,. '- ,‘''',.',.:• 1"; al i ini Ma- .-- ,`I:.: ::::;•:::::::::--"91 ,fr, ..-:,..,..:::--- .....•4,4' .7:-t•ti:•,7-,,;Th, • •• t r -t ,,. i IIIIIIIMEil 'ttl!,:.;1t; i *..4'•-yzi''''''..*Cr:-*--•:-4: Pa rk ,.... '1,.." . ... 8 ..... . . -, 2 ....' '--: ,...,t....,..,..„,.... ,, -.,:,......"2„:„._,..., ..,_„.„...„..„..-„„,,,,-..:7-..... ,„,.,.;,,„ .__. . 1111111111111111111111'.4 si-,-;,,: kyli,;;;7' g'--' ."''' " '• V- ,.-.1.1:. Y,..::::A , DREWS-. ' ::::Nii.r. :7 1'r.':::::")'4'...:.7:2.*f.::2:1...,: *:. :AIM, IIIIIIIIIIIME ▪ S•1:14'.:1.:: :::'•• ...mummumm 7 F.-;;31.44-::...;',. "P.r:PAeBrioYuPnadraceryl, --.16.:.1144.: 1......At:::r.-‘. Ti -7- f.C:' 'VW .4'';‘)P1Park . - 'i I ... ' - INI,E,E1511tVine 7.-_,-....:4 72: :.:Wetlands ,.-,.,,ii,' :.f.'.-'2.-•.-.:;-. ----, .:,, .,:, .-.- .,_.------ .,..-- --- - •Iiiitittimiiiiiii,_., ,..,..„....... _..,, ._:. .4-,:-.-.-......- At?(.,,:: -::: ,- •4. .-..1.,ii'i,"-:..... :.::::'. Elipilinti.........;-..'.V.1&„.... [j City of Naples .. ......,.. ..- 1, . ‘,,,k.- -• 4.o: ..:::: -‘,54-: : : t---::Ej.44,.71.*:.: 'etf....-.!:•• • t,••••.:., "" : t I Mile (-... •i:.. .i7.4.:.:::-":, ...^1. .. ,,,.!i....i. . ,4,,,, . 31-4... , -,-;- ••:••• -:!' •`:..'. '''''•::".,:,•,''Tf'':':":,j;. ...:.: ''' ....,..s.." ' .",t44.'...;.',.:7-:..'4,....,..l' -::: f....*: " 12::::-::,:::;:-..-::,:::*...;1,..,...,.-:-.:,:: . • ,.-,4.,-Nge25-t-,t -'"-::•-511.24 5 .4f. -- ,-,;/---- Jr:,,,,-..-..--,„ Map 5-3-12: Transportation Needs&Considerations 5-3-47 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 ' 4A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS _ .11 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Regional&County Transportation Projects The projects shown in Map 5-3-13 are those identified in the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's Fiscal Year 2017/18 to 2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program (which also features the Collier County five-year program) and the trail recommendations from the Comprehensive Pathways Plan update process.These projects will thus be overseen by regional and county transportation agencies.The full set of recommendations from the Comprehensive Pathways Plan,once finalized,should also be considered in conjunction with transportation planning and improvements led by the CRA. FDOT TIP Projects ■••••• • US 41 resurfacing • US 41 signal timing improvements • Davis Boulevard resurfacing ii;111 County TIP Projects • Davis Boulevard/Airport Pulling Road intersection improvement 1 MPO Pathways Plan Proposed Trail Improvements • Naples Bay Greenway(Sun Trail) Major Corridor Nei 5-3-48 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS , 5.3 5, ‘.. 1 . , ,,,-.- , lifiralll 1A11114- - vimr- 2 -,--1 -1"-- , , - - DAVIS BLVD . - - - ; ....',.:1 , , A rg 1,r11111"4"ri ' WO O.D 7A:11'-F , -: 1111111111111111111111,_ .- ..____,(k ,,,. . , cr If ----1'- . , „.... ., , . , , / A,..! ,,,,.•.:, 1.• .. .. _ ______, - )1," 0 I 111 1111Id i ,_ ft 1-. . LI NWOp D-AVE inillrzAi j14113tf-lifNlt-'--- l't=i -- 4, - III/P-Ii.°41,1114:111111411110111 III illu%, mg 5 Hi 1 '-i-Flat• 511611[19‘ L.. -A ' 1 i .44p, 0 MUM ci- ..--:,-; ,i';'7.;:i ; so 7-- *it:, &,.,'111111111T LP C3 ialiall 1E 1::::----1 // ,r4 0,, ' ‘..7.- < BMIII = , ite,..::::::2-, ! .", 'Ell I Nil el- ' • :-., r-- ; 1111---`"'Er'1•3; E '' -.) ...-i ',' r"----.. 1EZ um al'ISE E. 'cr t..,i .._.) HEIL N.Ea _.i."F.• . . --- Illii Wallit‘ tall r-,•'•=ran. NM , . , ------------- 1 : 11 Hai -- Fri 2 ; 1 . 1-.------1:' ;I "'1144E1 II, r 0 ; / , .,.. _:.,...„. 4• IN' -- 1 ' "di 4715 1 1 IA gm nil ' '' '1"I ' - 1 =•nu 7 , , ,....... ,, ' • \--- f 1 ''"'--kiiimimminiii )III I ,MIL . i.,, 1'____ _... umenuovis ' i I . ki•' ' r !.1: 1_ ;III 1 lon: 4 4r- ,,.:-- „."-,,s.,4, 1 AN ,_ am ,,,, . i, i 1 ll.,ut f ' LAMM . \\‘:..' 1. ‘ 1 06,... Ifft 1 '' -r' \ - :-gg .. - !gm:I 6:gg :- gggg;giggi gg g-ggg Cr ., _ ,g { ) r ::•. - ..'4' -. --:::::1 `j -1-0jj 1 j3H L.-,.-a • L. .--' '''''- '''.. ‘..)4.1 :1::%:, -7.'-i--.-,!-, •i. :-...41.42:1.,L, ce, 7 ---, •. .„, ,;,_. • ,...............„,_ i \ . ---i,---,„ ,, ,, .1111glin ! ,, . _„ , , ,, unimmit ....,..... .......<7-N-- ik y 1 -IP,liumnsi-M i' 1:11,--AVE iiiiim 1 ' ,,,,,..-6,= ..,,,.• ,, 1/4, ', I I SEM. ',R7'-ll-,• --•Ai, ,,‹) 1 IIIIIIIIIINIIIIIll 1 ir, ; ! \e„ , 1111115111111111111 r , ___ . ....._____..._., . . I:, „. 4 ' '77 i '-e ' ' IMIMAIMI CC II II .7..,,, 1 I 4.1 IIMMINNE:wsum------- -----'---- - ----- - \ ,zzcz i I cc- _ / - A 'MMIMM ---- - ,"-."--' c'E \szi7,-.------- _- . winiummtvii! ../, ,,,, . , .' - \ .__,. 1 --- E-- 11 '-'...__,.- - 1 , - ,...,,..*...,.. , , ,....:- „.,,,, ,,„. „, . '\ . ...1 ‘1011.61 \\ 1"1* . 1 1 .ly i' ‘.;;;.:. . .. I 1 '... WillEPOrt 0 L,•.„, ''' ..'741L'.1...i: ''• ''' &( .-' . TH°MASSON DR - ' 1 --- ------ NN, •.;7 7.:.— „„.23%,2'*.' > 21 ''''' I ' 11111Ihnd ,, 441 . e-''' = 131111111111111111 ...„.ik: 7 \ \ - :‘.1.!2:-;,,lc„'.i;e. ,---, ti .„,,'';-,,,,,:cyh__,a.,,c •cC—\REN DR': - ;-4..... i f ..\-,.._ .- m .., .. .1 'itc.13LML;j123-In•. ------- / / %-i--- ‘1.. ‘– .. 4' 4, g4 ::' ,,,-.7.-4;c:"::' ril —.. ,,, ..,..i-citv.*.E.74.4., ,sw.4.-.7.4....L.:;;;;4. ,-.,1 :,-,,' .inl.im , -., :.':.,...4:1;,,_.--..'--.-.;;•'-',,, -- .- --. r.„----•:" .;::`,,g(e.s. ...., BaYview .-g -,imiiiiMmts g g . •• lionnimint: gg:g g LT,l'higgiv, II 1-7:1; -7-.-''" gg,g ggggft.gig.'"7-''''''?:----.14,..ci,, LaJ-•*,..-,,),16;:At 1"7>*:,•::I.4,7NO .:-.'.2-414e'.. ........ -- •-„•;.,:::,F.t.:,.._ , PP rk - 7.-: '.. ."!;!'r CC •::':',i;-,..1:;:' 1......7 117:',:. . :.•tY..'f:.. :ilk ••,. t.f.7: .V.:JOOMIlinl• .,, .. ,,.= ... .4....... i...._,:.,,,t4.....,..._..... ''Cl-- r.: ...= : 7. . j.j2 ..ce H11111111111111111111 4;:.....:. co Le j -- y DREWSAVE::::iii-7.*:.:.:-:::- 1 1 pro rt -94.&•.7.-•---,..'N114,::' . (,.-----'..2..# d,-, .7.-:• ...... - Lil ansmnimmi -;;;,..kL'4\k .—." Cl 4.2--...‘t.,,... : :... •:::::::_fh*.e.•;;T:a: 4:.-17.•. f.• z.-...– i Lipz. milimyipH4 7.7.:;,!..,:.•:.Hig: U CRA Boundary ._. . ._. . ......... 4.',,•••13i.V..:-*1-. .17.".„-k4.,. III ..`"..- -' --- , . ... --• ''' '''''''' PAIM„,,--4-'111""n” 3 imil ....VVetlands , • --- - At. .:*„A F:-:'.......'Ai!''',.....:7 . ,,,,,Jill lc i gif:4-.-_-.• .... LT City of Naples ..;:,-.:.•.- ..... , 7'....-44.......:-... .v.e.:MIL I.: *. ..._. .._ '''::::-: , ----..." :,,,___:- .„- • • ' .. ...-. , \-!Y,-:: -.. •-*:-; . -.„-:....-:;.:•":51.1*a',..,....gr:g..,..=.•• .. -- MI 7 .•!. 7 . Stik:gAtg g......gv ..- --.4.*.:.•;-T_' •?).1., .kionittesuakeikon.gie . e , ' ....• ---=,,.-„,,,„ ---•...•--'--7.7 Au:, Map 5-3-13: Regional&County Transportation Projects ... Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 - 5-3-49 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A 644 04004440004004*.S 04 06600 O•*••e O•••44 t 005445504 fld 0004 FIn4.111,•f."1 (' eaa:ilbte ClratItt"P'"'"'"" '( r:! Complete Streets is an approach to comprehensive corridor improvements tailored to the size and land use context of the corridor.This approach can address many of the major needs and considerations identified in Map 5-3-13,including traffic calming,sidewalks,bike lanes, lighting,wayfinding,on-street parking,and landscaping.Complete streets improvements can also be coordinated with other infrastructure improvements,such as water main,fire suppression,and drainage upgrades. The CRA can take the lead on Complete Streets projects,focusing on the streets listed below categorized. Fieldwork,staff discussions,public outreach,and prior planning efforts informed which streets were targeted for these improvements. Map 5-3-14 shows recommended projects for neighborhood streets and busier corridors("Major Complete Streets"). Suggested improvements for Major Complete Streets corridors may include changes to the roadway for vehicles(such as the addition of on-street parking).Neighborhood Complete Streets&Trails recommendations focus primarily on improvements for pedestrians,cyclists,and other active transportation(see the remainder of Section 5.3.5 for examples of suggested improvements).Connectivity in terms of destinations and network connections was a key consideration in selection and prioritization of these projects.Note that the length of the bicycle and pedestrian trail will depend on considerations such as available right-of-way;the Section 5.4 capital planning provides an estimate for a section between East Naples Community Park and Sugden Regional park.Also note that the Kirkwood Avenue"connection" between Pine Street and Shadowlawn and the Pine Street"connection" between Davis and Linwood refer to proposed roadway extensions that that do not have existing right-of-way. 40 Major Complete Streets 4111 Neighborhood Complete Streets&Trails • Linwood Avenue—Phase I • Bay Street • Shadowlawn Drive • Linwood—Phase II • Bayshore Drive(north of Thomasson Drive) • Danford Street • Thomasson Drive • Hamilton Avenue • Commercial Drive • Jeepers Drive • Kirkwood Ave/Kirkwood Ave Connection to • Republic Drive Shadowlawn Drive • Bayshore Drive(south of Thomasson Drive) • Pine Street Connection • Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail AllimmisOk Major Corridor 5-3-50 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ', 5.3 , „.... ...... -...,. 1 i I Mil , /1 1 ----e--- , . ,f ,,„ , , ,,..., N :1----•'''-----I -2----------,,-- KIRKWOOD AVE 9 1 kj rgir'—'4111Ali i 1 ' — 1 !arm,, ' ; ,...— ---11--- --' i 410 1 `I.Q71 ai ..... _, ... limn el ,=, , 1- -"" - '''''''' 1 L--- • 4 --. [ L- t 2 .• — .........._:::-:r, 1i1 ;t -_, ..mu Lj 04,' ulT g ' ¶TY-IT m 4,„„ .1. ,,....,_,, , . -, . -,r [ . . .: . . i bh.. M`- 1 1 5 - 1 T).. .i'd n . IMMIlli a=11.! Mil -, , - 1 ill I pm *to Fa=-.0 SIII H :Ii• ... ... i , i---1-t----- so 64‘6„:111 :: i -...-1-.i fr.-E.:ill .---.111„7111, \,,,. ...In! 1 . , / _./ .. I Ili_ 11111, aim I Ilk 4 ''' ''' 11111 111111111 1111 U. ' 7 0--- i 1. \ iii.6.......... .A :A.t* tt I ., [ u it: -4 a-4 is v212.g .ft. . 4 ,... ,,, _ .1,..,-,„ a imir. ,,4k F. :1•. ! / ..: L-..i_i "ii.,-i i .. \ , 1111:1: i „./..„ "'""'49' E.Lii nil .. .tt. . .CNN. IN, f 1 --- 't•-t.,..::T.t.--.-7.., ,..- .,?'..V,',. /22'1 .'t' \”.7,, T'-''' •t, IS. 4k9ii. 1 At. ..!,-- \ '-'. .. ....... . , ,CC !, ,--)\:" -,---,--ir 1---37 -... . '1 ,..,....le -.---. 1.. .-),-, i 1 ---- ' ---,. ., .-__ '. '.:,/ I.. ,..'Lj'• ( ...N>jk. .;1,.. t 1 T , ,,R.,,E......,,,:. -------- /c.„,ci. rL3 4 i. ,11111111111111101111r -').'''':' :.:: -e-''! ' — ------- i \--- •-,,„,", , , i---• I -"i'• ' '''1'.-' \l''' ' mill: BA. :AVE- ' `. 7 % \ Ni: I--I • -'''-''''' .1:-• ''' ./.i ---•'<rc, \ ' 1111111111111 • -' IRV ..--.T:,'%; t7 ...t.,,vttQ t t saimmunuin , 1 r }....:\ , - ' \-- '.'- -; 111111111111111111 4 i /7 .' i ,z. — -nommomm cc 1111111111111116. ' I ! maammail =I-1.); mamaitiamanallft /7' •,- Itt'''ttt'Nt tt, ,s:;.,-, _alikitkit_aamiiaa cual p...h..",..1-7„," . , ., ,.--.. - •Auta,„0, c,,,,,,,,,zz•s ummmum 2 _ --' ' -,,g.i . -...„„, , \ , .. _ , ' - ..---c-c------1/1,///-D---- Sugden 0 / , . _rRegional .,\ .,...., \84,--------_, r", '7' t-e'' cm Park \ obi°t It-ammo— .0 ____, , u,. f _ — : . \ . .,...;., .,--.,•• -..., JEEPERS 4.,.(1,.11...: li 4...z.-4 . ....74,:;.4 S ItiV44illiif !I < I-- I ' EiC.) ! _______ 1 '.;i g -,....,,,inian ,I .7-0. . 1 4--:.... 7: -.-:..:1 -!. .1 THOMASSON DR - ' . ------.ILd ,---,-------- --,! . -.:-.4...,.T..::, ,s ,,I,,.-.''..... ...,= ..1., -, •groothat, E-....,..-!..;,-,;,.m0111 11111.11_... : -.*: . ` "' ' 1;'''''- EL ainumummuunul 'N/ • i ].,...,-,go_-- ,\..., •I'...-'_1,''.'::::4?-..-'1:- ../.-::::, ="'t. .,:f.:'-"'::::i::'"izzib3. '''... REpUOLIC DR . IMIEMIB3%.1,--::::7'... ' '...,.•p; I!...r.DANFORD ...1-1 2 ,:.i;i..i,",:..:-.:........-,.7'4B zy......4-4r,_4 13veW- ctamP4 q T! i ; •;$-Ik:.'lii !..-"::"4.1,1ft:.•*-.2...-tt:a.kx-,-..-!a-*1•? ..4.7A.U. ......7 • ......:5,...._ BAY ST • ; .,.. -,,,=, ._ liiiM11111111111111101111 i .iL.:•;:.:;:7".. •L"-•::,::-,:.t-fr.,......„:" "--.. ......•."•-• .. ....,,.... AMMER 4/1.-.2 41,,re .19t114-,... ...J.,-...._.19k4, ....4c, ...i:::744.e..:::;.::::- :....-- 4'...: 1 i Property Parcel •-,....,...----t i•-•:•.:- -49,•t.:::t Nt =MIL:r.INUDOIRMEOWINSillitil .-A14; ': -...--•••...:::-4'.-f.: .......::t•• rundillitumiquift, -:,.}-?::.... .. ri CR A Boundary .ic.:::::::7i: :: ..;)14' ' ,2'. .;7-. ''..."' . .. .w.....i...,.......- islk/...,.... MB Park sl u., .qt-'",:;:-..1..:'... 4.1...slk,i Hama si,-. _ -:: - ...1.•.-- IMEIRA„......„ • Wetlands -..."'.*.c\-i14:•-•- f,T. ....-.,f_,„._... '7. • -:'..i, ' ••••;11,1 -•: =-:'::...,4Z!...... . -..,-1 •..ii.w :9 '*14.,. [j City of Naples ..t ''' ' '' •...,. ;'k 7-::' ',1(:...Til ,Ilk•....:.".7- •-:,:-;jk-:-....',11e,::7::il.if.:::F:::,'-1 ::..:.:::::.44:.•::::., • -:,;':'''' -;.-_••Srli.c.:.:.:-.7.:7.;,,„/. -44...:i 1::"•::":"..-...'i;J A/4:7±.:: t.L.7.::. MI= -111119121111 Mlle A -.: • • -'.44,.. /..'•-•..i-.'.'1'.f..:- '•,-r• ','"'-..f'*::-.. .,''':".1..L.. . ..g'::.".: ...4:•::7'',..4 ,i14, •.: "... i.744.•--YN*....Z . . -.:;::•::-::*::.: .:- ....7/..."•...•.L.J, .. Map 5-3-14: Potential Complete Streets Projects .•. . .= -...,:,, ,,v,,,,:`,..,..y,.. . ,,,:..i Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 . 5-3-51 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Character Images for Complete Streets Improvements and Connections The following images illustrate Complete Streets elements from prior planning efforts for Bayshore Dr and Complete Streets improvements elsewhere. BAYSHORE DRIVE CENTER 2 FAST MYEST ROW LNE ROW LRE ! oplc _' 24' : 24 r 7' 20' 20',. T— i C t 55' 4' 11' '1 ; } 11 _ d` 35' S.5' i I ,FL. 1 ii*Th 1 I 1 I -, -"" i F PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION TWD LANE ROAD WITH PARALLEL PARKING,BIKEUWES AND SIDEWALKS DESIGN SPEED 4 30 MPH Potential cross section for Bayshore Dr road diet,as proposed in Trebilcock's 2017 Parking Needs Analysis.Existing cross section is four-lane road with bike lanes and sidewalks Complete Streets improvement * examples(Left image source: _ __ _ , ti Wikimedia Commons) .. , y' These efforts and examples inspired the renderings of possible transformations for Linwood Ave, Bayshore Dr,and Jeepers Dr(shown in Figures 5-3-6 through 5-3-9)suggested as part of this Redevelopment Area Plan update effort. As corridors for potential commercial redevelopment,the Linwood Ave and Bayshore Dr renderings highlight an emphasis on ample sidewalk space along the landscaping and storefronts. Linwood Ave might promote a more modern design style for lighting z Of. and streetscape features as shown in Figure 5-3-6 and potentially further inspired by the modern style images on page 5-3- 22.Bayshore Dr might retain the existing style of streetscape elements in the lighting and signs.These renderings can provide a starting point for Complete Streets designs of other busier corridors(see"Major Complete Streets'on Map 5-3- 49),with the Linwood Ave design particularly suited as a basis for the suggested re-designs of Commercial Dr and Kirkwood _ Ave. As a less traveled residential street type,Jeepers Dr shows how people biking,walking,and playing can share the street SVi space with cars accessing residences.Given that many streets dead-end and do not allow for through traffic,more simplified pedestrian infrastructure may be promoted over formal sidewalks. For example,the pedestrian space in the w,e < < 5-3-52 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 T>_, 9 ti PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 rendering might be indicated with road paint.The swales have also been retained for water quality considerations,but incorporate vegetation to improve the visual appearance of swales.Porouspavement mayalso be an option for the areas P g p pp P where swales are represented,which might require different maintenance costs (an aspect that would be addressed with a more detailed follow-up design evaluation as noted below). Lighting in provided on one side given the limited road space, 7,� similar to improvements made on Lunar St in the CRA area.This type of design might serve as a starting point for the re- design of other neighborhood Complete Streets projects(see Map 5-3-49). Note that these proposed cross sections are only intended for general,initial illustrative purposes;final designs would need to account for a more detailed study and analysis of factors including engineering considerations,impacts, mitigation 10,1 needs,and potentially the increase of alternative transportation methods(see Objective 2,Strategy 1 of this section for examples). For example,a follow-up analysis of a lane reduction proposal on Bayshore Drive would need to account for impacts to Level of Service standards on the roadway and on connecting roadways such as US 41,air quality,freight and evacuation routes,and a variety of other factors. It would also study whether additional easements would be needed or desired for a re-design. Piloting temporary versions of these improvements also provides a way to vet the design.This plan accounts for this follow-up analysis need and piloting with budgeted items for a Bayshore Drive technical feasibility study,a Complete Streets Implementation Plan that would provide a next-level feasibility analysis for these projects,and a Bayshore Drive pilot project with opportunities for additional pilots as part of the"other" non-capital projects budget item(see Section 5.4 for more information). F'eta z \,k 5Mea v\M,a„' k�1 \� ^i� ' k A 44 /111111V. limmummmommimmic SIDEWA_K CD PARKING f BUFFER TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE PARKING i BUFFER CG SIDEWALK 8 9 -- IT ti 9' 8' 2' 2' 8ocotkr ' TWO LAN: AA CTION WITH SIDEWALKS AND PARALLEL PARKING:SCALE 114 e„� s TindallegiOliver ��+- wo,e....,. »w...esv...e.......no...�...�.....a....w.Tmw�.e�..w.�,. design Figure 5-3-6:Potential Cross Section of Linwood Ave Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-53 5.3x` PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS A ' f ,. . � ms , 1.F,,, " , * f- pa F ; � . , 1 aC5aY '4„ TtF s .41111111111. i."'... i : .-.1 , ._--'' ''.- 1111)I • V 3; .,a..f4 .,... _,ter .... .111; ; A'-'''.5Y''',.5.5'.7'.57.7-57:57.'r.< .5,;......-^---.111.11111"-.-. -r�_ sa..., , `a- 5%a ' 7:: LANDSCAPE SIDEWALJL PARKIND BIKE TRAVEL LANE LANUSCAPEU MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE BIKE PARKING SIDEWALK (ANDSCAPE LANE UWE Vanes __ Sb'—a.3' e' S' t:' _ Zp' I 11' S' - e 3'.--59' # »15'CC 1.5'CG•- �IANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE WE. -o-: 33: \ c,„ g Bim• SECTION WITH MEDIAN,BIKE UWE PARALLEL PARKING AND SIDE WALKS AND SCALE: i/b`•t' ` Tindale>-Oliver �ilT/4Hfy, Q'17t10fb d P s i R -,i;.... cfi Figure 5-3-7:Potential Cross Section for Bayshore Dr � "" y s` t �, 1 ��is 4 s, ', J t i ' v J 'a.. �F m aft � d< • v T .. +,' b♦ ,,,,,,-„,,,,,t4,�a 3,4 BIOSWALE TRAVEL LANE BBLEePEO BIOSWALE LANE pyo; p' 14' -- G. SO' 41 �.% ea' 4 :i 4 cc'] SECTION WITH BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN LANE AND BIOSWALES:SCALE LN'•1' jeepers „�,,, Tindale:-Oliver ..445.44,.."-444 w+..a.•n.,w<+-....,...o..+a..a.....,.,+.r..•.rw�.�...,n...5..J.. ,....<.�........ d e s i g n Figure 5-3-8:Potential Cross Section for Jeepers Dr 5-3-54 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 C , , , . t 1 1 I i • 1 • 1 I /' ! i I I I • a, 1 1 !; i 81OSWALE TRAVEL LANE BIKE/PED BIOS WALE 20' I, t1' -I- LANE'I. 2{Y ] .,.. - ,, 60, Cott ONE LANE PLAN WITH BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN LANEANDBIOSWALES SCALE tt8'�,'County Tindale> Oliver Jeepers Drive ...r,,.►..... 911712°18design 'AIMM+bw�M�Mp+^+wseraxt�uadwwsw ar nv...r app,r'<a r.,4"...ay aa*v^NY na++.../wea+..a s»em.+xnm. Figure 5-3-9:Potential Aerial Rendering for leepers Dr Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-55 9A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 2: Increase and enhance alternative vehicle mode options within and connecting with the CRA area. • Strategy 1: Evaluate opportunities for alternative transportation methods (e.g., golf carts, electric shuttles, other neighborhood/electric vehicles, shared and/or autonomous vehicles, bikeshare, water-borne transportation), including considerations for partnerships with neighboring communities. • Strategy 2: Coordinate with Collier County Public Transit& Neighborhood Enhancement Department for transit service and facilities improvements(e.g., more frequent service and transit stop shelters). • Strategy 3: Evaluate option to expand Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA)to include entire CRA area. Objective 3: Improve parking options in commercial areas. • Strategy 1: Evaluate parking concepts for the Bayshore Dr and Mini Triangle/Linwood Ave commercial areas, which may include: • Shared parking with shuttle service, particularly to meet peak-season demand • Reduced design requirements for parking • On-street parking as part of the Bayshore Dr road diet • Parking garages • Parking mitigation fee (development pays for construction of public parking in lieu of providing parking spaces) • Considerations for changes in alternative transportation methods such as those noted in Objective 2, Strategy 1 of this section. 5-3-56 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 '_ l.„; PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS '' :ate r 401100. V ,.,,. 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) Policy 5.4 of the Transportation Element in the Growth Management Plan created the South US 41 TCEA.This designation allows commercial and residential developments an exception to meeting transportation x concurrency standards, which relate to the timing and programming of necessary transportation facilities to ensure they are generally provided in a timeframe comparable to the development. (see Policy 5.3 of the Capital Improvement Element for more details). The strategies developers can use to obtain the exception are intended to reduce trips or miles traveled in single-occupancy vehicles, such as incentives and amenities to promote ` transit, carpooling,telecommuting, walking, and biking.This Redevelopment Area Plan reinforces these strategies : by promoting mixed-used and urban land use types that support alternative transportation (see Section 5.3.2). Objectives 1 and 2 of this section also promote improved facilities for walking, bilking, and transit use. A potential ", option to further align the redevelopment efforts of the CRA and the goals of the TCEA is to expand the TCEA to include all of the CRA area, expanding the exception applicability to further encourage alternative transportation. , 5TH AVE 5 - -_ __- ___ __+ _�.. Now DAVIS BLVD - - fa --__ i11111101billiM:: rte.. - t�, *F _ - I , - - �?, -.,....-.„1.-_c k - Public Commercial Residential Total Acres _ - 92.96 540.58 429.49 063 0 1 . 3 o . I } N. i 8.74% 50.85% 4041% 100% -- 1 1 — -- , Czi --- 41 H o S 71OMA5SONDR -i P RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD 7-7-1:::: P \ I ". 0 OAS-0:1 9.3 0.6 0' -,-P IIMI >•�Miles --- F GIS IMPP4 xs at m YAW,MCP -1"- .i. 41 Vow Pwks 1:33c6p eoumry TR-4 c3 er*ado....rnn :p, oma ;,, ,,, South US 41 Transportation Ali Parcels Count e1595(100%),&onof eves=,LIE,03(1oa%) Va<rt Cows 229(14.4%X Sup o/scam.116AI(108%) ,, —b'dtinaay Rwan Non-VsoM count-1186 f85.8%):Sup M sons.sM.82(6#I%) , —ppm Concurrency Exception Area(TCEA) ��. South US 41 TCEA (Source:Collier County Growth Management Plan,Transportation Element,Map TR-4) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-57 5.3:kr PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A Objective 4: Improve transportation connections with Downtown Naples. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with the City of Naples to explore and partner on transportation improvements and approaches serving both Downtown Naples and the CRA area noted in Objective 2, Strategy 1 of this section. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study This study,completed in 2017, included a recommendation for an improved bicycle and pedestrian pathway on the Gordon River Bridge(5th Avenue/US 41)that connects Downtown Naples and the Triangle area.The proposed design calls for narrower travel lanes and removal of the road shoulder to increase the bicycle and pedestrian pathway to 14 feet on either side of the bridge. If implemented,the responsibility for carrying out the project would be FDOT. t jail till .11A I ` — _ .__�� Proposed typical section for Gordon River Bridge bicycle and pedestrian improvement from 2017 Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study (Source:City of Naples,https://www.naplesgov.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/streets amp stormwater/project/3351 city council presentation 201710 final revisions.pdf) T') rta xv Tv' E 4 'Sm e. Awa 5-3-58 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS X5.3 '1;,,. =a� 5.3.6 Infrastructure Objective 1: Ensure that infrastructure Infrastructure can be key to facilitating development, provided will effectively achieve its primary , '..,- providing rproviding the services communities need to function. purpose without significantly compromising ',..i: Certain infrastructure, such as for stormwater environmental and neighborhood design management, is particularly important in the CRA area, which grapples with natural environmental quality. factors including storms and flooding but also • Strategy 1: Develop a stormwater master plan for benefits from a healthy natural environment due to comprehensive infrastructure improvements that quality of life factors and tourism.As a result, the incorporates consideration for the following: ;. framework for this section aims to provide effective • Flood plain designations, including FEMA infrastructure that preserves environmental and flood designations and Coastal High neighborhood design quality through coordinated Hazard requirements , improvement planning and funding. • Building and site plan design to respond to flooding . • Primary, secondary, and tertiary `/ GOAL infrastructure improvements (both short- a „ I and long-term) 7,..Provide effective infrastructure that preserves • Potential for a bicycle and pedestrian environmental and neighborhood design quality pathway in easement of north/south along ditch Regional coordinated improvement planning and drainage Sugden Re Tonal Park • Shared maintenance and maintenance funding. funding between County and CRA -I: • Water quality gid.. ....................-a........:...........,.........-......-a.' • Use/design of right-of-way areas on local �t streets, including an evaluation of turf block(see page 5-3-58) • Innovative techniques to pilot in CRA area, P: including green infrastructure • Strategy 2: Coordinate stormwater infrastructure planning with design of new parks (see Section �. 5.3.3, Objective 1). .7 • Strategy 3: Integrate green infrastructure improvements into landscaping and drainage improvements, including those funded by the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 -r 5-3-59 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A t ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Green Infrastructure Examples Green infrastructure aims to reduce stormwater runoff and = .. r x treat it closer to its source while providing environmental, social,and economic benefits.The following examples create surfaces or collection structures that allow stormwater to " ` infiltrate the underlying or surrounding ground.They also can help manage stormwater flows and improve water quality of # ; runoff and often can be combined with vegetation and - "" landscaping. "' �� • Infiltration basin/retention pond—shallow basins or ponds that collect stormwater and can allow it to Kissimmee Lakefront Park rain gardens(Source:City of Kissimmee, infiltrate the underlying ground https://www.kissimmee.org/Home/Components/News/ News/2208/263?backlist=%2F) • Permeable pavement—pavement that allows water to flow through and infiltrate the underlying ground • Rain garden—shallow planted basins that allow water to infiltrate the ground ....� 7 xixix a • Bioswales—vegetated or soft-lined channels that collect and convey,slow,and clean water and let it infiltrate into ` the ground • Vegetated planter boxes and bulb-outs—infiltration areas with raised edges that can be incorporated into roadway design features • Tree plantings . ' Vegetated infiltration area in roadway bulb-out in Palmetto,FL at 10th Ave W and 5`h St W(Source:Google Maps,https:// www.gooale.com/maps/@27.5151522,- 82.575633,3a,60y,118.29h,75.57t/data=!3m611 e1!3m4! l sl a h qGi vzSzL DetQ43h5HQ q!2e 0!7i 13312!816656) w a„ . t4* r P, • e r Fs me ' m + a^,,',-y ,.. *Y' '* „' ?' r` a a t s C` lip"' Retention pond amenities in Tampa at E Dr Martin Luther King Jr.Blvd and N 19th St(Source:Google Maps,https://www.google.com/maps/@27.9815571, 82.4391844,3a,60 y,90t/data=!3m6!lel!3m4!IsQJ3u13LDTa tc2Vr7pk(flq!2e0!7i13312!8(6656) 5-3-60 s Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS „ 5.3 i< C ' -7 ,_:._ .� Objective 2: Coordinate with other jurisdictions and government entities for infrastructure planning and funding. • Strategy 1: Identify additional funding opportunities to supplement capital { improvements funds (e.g., grants). l4;` Il`iill l, Strategy 2: Document the project prioritization '� = strategy to upgrade water lines and fire I t suppression systems in coordination with the City x_ F ".- iy1 of Naples. a, Turf block,shown in the right-of-way area immediately bordering the • Strategy 3:As part of the stormwater master plan ti street in the photo above,has been used in certain developments in the (Objective 1, Strategy 1 of this section), Bayshore neighborhood to allow for use of right-of-way space for park- ing.This option should be evaluated as part of the right-of-way design coordinate with Collier CountyStormwater considerationsinthestormwatermasterplanupdate. Management to integrate CRA stormwater infrastructure planning with County stormwater planning efforts. I • Strategy 4:As part of the stormwater master plan effort (Objective 1, Strategy 1 of this section), coordinate with Collier County Zoning Division to : create right-of-way design guidelines for development that coordinate with Complete a Streets concepts for neighborhood streets. • Strategy 5: Coordinate with Collier County agencies and utility providers to identify and improve other infrastructure including sanitary sewer lines, roadways that fail to meet minimum standards, and electrical utilities identified to be : placed underground or relocated. 1it, i 1. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-61 9A 5.“ PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS e EXISTING CONDITIONS Infrastructure—Stormwater, Roadway Engineering,Sanitary Sewer, Electric Stormwater and flooding are major challenges in the CRA area, requiring special attention be paid to stormwater management projects.The CRA has already overseen a successful drainage improvement project on Karen Drive,and moving forward,will coordinate with the County Stormwater Management Section. Map 5-3-15 shows where further stormwater management improvements are needed based on public outreach.Additional needs should be identified through an updated stormwater master plan for the area.Other identified infrastructure needs on the map include upgrading certain roads to meet County standards,upgrading capacity of sanitary sewer infrastructure in certain areas, and placing underground or relocating overhead electric utilities in certain areas. 411 Need for culverts for flooding, Retention pond area improvements needed—lighting, security, barriers/gates to direct car traffic, pump improvements for flooding issues 4111 Flooding issues and need for drainage Flooding issues and need for drainage on side streets off of Bayshore Drive. Note that Pine Tree Drive, Andrews Avenue, and Woodside Avenue have been identified as below County standards 4 (involving for example sufficient right-of-way, drainage, paving, or similar elements) in Resolution 2011-097.These streets should be a focus in stormwater and infrastructure planning to bring them up to standards. a Flooding issues and need for drainage on Holly Avenue. Holly Avenue also identified as below County standards and in need of road engineering improvements (see Item 4 above). 6 Palmetto Court identified as below County standards and in need of road engineering 6 improvements (see item 4 above). Upgrades needed to sanitary sewer capacity in the Triangle area to support new development. Opportunities to place overhead electric utilities on Linwood Avenue and Commercial Drive underground or relocate them. �.a 5-3-62 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A , 53 E D N gIIIIIIIIIII.i. 'Ill Li DAVIS BLVD ■ ---["'. ■■■lli_.1 1 1111/l I r• tr��11A1■ - / --_ . : KIRKWOOD AVE i ^ 4 ?'- En2 _ �! ■I.IR ♦:40. .,a 1La Nil, -.. ,t� .: 14 �(' ‘1-1 . I TI /� -`/ j aFiI -----1 I I 1 ni 6 - ru v ,- 1 Li f-s\ ' \), 1 1 LA11111110‘10.2111 gm' 1 y I ~ 1 .i 1�mi ii— .1 11'..:\ 1 L a ll ' 'ling frJIUfflI' • v 1dI_ iiiiirm L r• ►,.. a mini i� ■ .,,Ili:sl ll s 1 ,.... 2 1 J 44rlr Ut r jluuilei^ /IIaI/ r' JJ IIIa111illallllla111. • I Q' •11u1■111 lot!!1111 I �. -- - BARRETTAVE ____......c,71: luuo maul �..J \ �a uullnl■nlnn� IR ( i' f -�.\\ at, 1 P \•, _ ■iiii/aluuuii= + y d -!',1 UII 111 1 1 i nulunuin Iniinn -_�__.1 .'1',1,---f "`. m �r 1 �u''�' i ccI < � -1 a 7; r w g Q 444V unununuulu! , .!rl1�/r Oma` ■IIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIae `�*•^' — a?; ,Ie W IWIf 1 _. situ �- 1' i t lint, ' a MOIL ---- tfGIt/11111 _ _ Y �a l 'OMASSON DR —.. — !,:,‘ W4) N. 6 III r ▪L,▪h �,Y' rv? • Z ■:iiuUll.1/Iiiiiii llil •.,we �` r•'� 7 O KAREN DR�� .> 1 `s - }- ' :� � •" Nap es D I �Botanica � �� llnnl :vlu-„' i sy Bayview 1 1 1111;LII p •-_ . •,71tr Park u/liUl nhII: ,' ` nal•--R1 111 tT .:,::;:?,±f,;74,,, ;I .. ---: ::: )kr wu.:_ ufu .> At 1 1 ,' A. .i.. :- '' , 1111A X11 u• --•/ \lr- •_. :7:: a 4.„.„,,,...vlNiti tr ., ▪ 1uANDREWS AVE . ._. ! ___ .,�,�•• !�" ^. atlala■IIIIIIIUU yy� __- Property Parcel hlr _" 41: ' wiitili113IUiil111111I1. .7 . . CRA Boundary :S 1 i, i .�;"• y 1 Park 01/ I '1dt` 5 IIannI I' I kammamaising ,__ xiu Wetlands t :4k ?t"' •4;:y.:.:- - -. J City of Naples »li ,,,,Ti,,,, : �.,. • ::::---• .. .:_- sir! ,rr` _ 'Jl` i ;-:•.ill&. Y� o, r. \l J: ( al(c.: __: > tllf/ �: Qp..1S6c »a 4 ._.. aux:':1,.,Biu'":..' : l4"., _ .'.,:;...sU he auk ,Yl i- -: .9!-.'.'-:. !-!,,,-,...-:•:.,41,.' ::. ...y1u Yet "sxlu . ?_:.1 r_ iIi adu \Ylti �_ _ C.' Ir Vu -...: ,Q.,...,7.;:.....14';*., a. Map 5-3-15: Infrastructure Needs-Storm water,Roadway Engineering,Sanitary Sewer,Electric Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-63 i 5.3 ` PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A 0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Water Infrastructure The City of Naples provides water and water infrastructure for the CRA area,which also supports fire suppression systems such as fire hydrants.The fire suppression infrastructure can influence the insurance ratings for an area.On a scale of 1 to 10(with 1 being the best),the CRA area currently has an Insurance Service Office(ISO) rating of 4. according to the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District. In practice,the District typically assigns ratings of 4,9,or 10. The City is currently in the process of upgrading neighborhood water lines to support hydrants for fire suppression. Areas highlighted in red on Map 5-3-16 indicate water mains that do not meet the standard fire flow requirements determined by the City of Naples' potable water model.These mains have potential for replacement to upgrade for fire flow improvements. However, note that other sections of the water mains in the CRA area are older and will need to be replaced eventually. There is continued interest on the part of the CRA to identify and obtain grants to complete this work in partnership with the City of Naples. ) 5-3-64 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS x:5.3 1, , i i r I • (�� 7 Ju IDu�1�, A dv. Np �Kl a ,c•,-,.?.'D.o'VE. ' .:1 • LS= /lei �'`` ' �� t . •, oitun . ,,,,„ ::_il 1 ):i i L�NWOODjAVE : . :=. . , ari -.. . di 1 a'-t .y,4„.,fiT la,,, - 'S i5aanal ,. .. . ' Areas highlighted in red i1. , 9lft .. o i a1 indicate water mains that f*°`'aT ,- i ': flg-z.....-u1i u� L-Q do not meet the standard ' <<' ' S: �'1 fire flow requirements l# _ ' [11w 77-' - �; determined by the City of R:,�:,, �' , , Naples' potable wateri i ,1 i s ��lit,„'. 4° 7,1.1 ,-.,..,.,,ii 'F. model.These mains have ; is/issitlliiii ,.. 's • \ Y; 1ws - • potential for replacement ,'` -- I - �, i R to upgrade for fire flowt:ifallit P 1. 1. i. , , t,,,,, .7 ,doshimprovements. However !_. r `-p , a ..... 'r',_ _ , note that other sections of ,1 `'` `u a �. ■ l, the water mains in the CRA Ir. ! .7'/iu >ori a g Q�IniT/n ui s, is c''�`1 I 1i� area are older and will til P ,�„ 17- 11 n r'��' 1 i e saM.t ' iB tsX need to be replaced even- . 1--, ' titkiiiNit iii_l1� "P ,� Vitillileitirt�€ I tually. tlrlrrrrtrltlt / ■irR•' • ��. ' ilrltrilli/t#hitt i�l{umLl6uui 11 ,,,, .. . '+ slittrttlltri!'Birt€t iaiurav/uen 3. ... . ---',"'..:.;',-.-,17r0 '3%, ,atilit itfaat.=Y3I.. ,l., / "'ilti� .iuL.i .- dill,,,.._, "fir,. _o,i ',j .,"T ` AIL cC'... Np }__ Sugden o TAlR' ¢ Regional -� Q'• k6141,-,-,---- 1r111,1!1 171 ,tir6 11 Park :I/ Z� n i i,, Attr ! 7 ..ff - ' .�1" 4 � -LTHOMASSON OR r " 0% < '. KARENIDR� � `'°' iii. ",,,g,/,- 4! _s Naples •EastiNaples f .__.. �'"� -r'� ¢ � Botanicol r� ' Community � '"' _ l Izr N,, r =,, 40 til -, .• r .,. •. Bayview+ • ,, , r1 ,g (u i -, Pari s •1•ti 1 [ _]Property Parcel ). - -- u; ', '''.-:*4.,: ?' S 4 a CRA Boundary ,� /Ili_,itliiiniilrttlr l 'L". - i91Ur6e1111//r.Ur7. • Water Hydrant •ir .,i r ---....7.....-.:-,,,„-- —water Service Line vu ic, . >u; l ANDREWS AVEAVE 4:'� �.� x phiiii,1is111(Itii 111z.4$,:-.-4,4...-:: —.Pressurized Water Main ,nn.: I!!I/i dill iI,IIIA Uk: t �1L•. ,i t 4 Park L. v v�-�- L i qlt 1ill111t(tn,iun :`_Wetlands alk " . liiii.iiiiIhi idIiliii' .._.,. t Cit of Naples p ,. 114f s.- • s.,, 'aJ ._ .- �,J y �� I .fir , l _5 ras a ___ r'. y1Gr. � ds 2a"• a�4.. l ,i;•-:',.:., � �Sli4' l -:..- .. � ,`� � ; C; �� ; Map 5-3-16: Water Infrastructure Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-65 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A 5.3.7 Process Objective 1: Improve approaches and tools The substance of the CRA's planning and for communicating with communities in the aF implementation is important, as is the way it carries CRA area and the general public. out this planning and implementation. In view of the • Strategy 1:As part of the marketing and diversity of communities living and working in the CRA communication strategy(see Section 5.3.4, area, this section lays out a framework to carry out Objective 1, Strategy 2), evaluate communication CRA area planning and implementation efforts to mechanisms and tools that will most effectively engage and serve the various communities within the communicate with the various communities in CRA area. the CRA area. • Strategy 2: Coordinate with schools and other CGOAL community partners to improve outreach and communication between the CRA and harder-to- reach populations. Carry out CRA area planning and implementation • Strategy 3: Provide multi-lingual communications efforts to engage and serve the various and materials. communities within the CRA area. • Strategy 4:Create a CRA-specific Capital Improvement Plan to identify, prioritize, and •-•••*m••••••• •••••••••••••*'•*••• •••• effectively communication near-term capital improvements . Coordinate with MSTUs operating in the CRA area for relevant capital improvement projects. Objective 2: Ensure a targeted and balanced distribution of CRA planning and implementation efforts. • Strategy 1:Account for both need-based and geographic considerations in the distribution of planning and implementation efforts. =, • Strategy 2: Identify street blocks for targeted comprehensive improvements, with a focus on blocks that have already received some improvements and consideration for balanced distribution of these targeted blocks throughout the entire CRA area. `4. 5-3-66 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A 5.3 • Strategy 3: Update rules and procedures for the CRA �. Advisory Board for legal consistency and with consideration given to a balanced distribution of planning/implementation efforts and diverse representation. Objective 3: Coordinate with MSTUs in the area and explore opportunities for new MSTUs. P. • Strategy 1: Incorporate Haldeman Creek and Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory Boards into planning and implementation processes for CRA improvements. • Strategy 2: Explore the option of creating an MSTU for capital improvements in the Triangle area north of US 41. 5.3.8 Character Areas In addition to a diversity of communities in the CRA area, there is also a diversity of built character. This section tailors the thematic goals, objectives, and strategies of the previous sections to specific character areas within the CRA area as a whole. The character areas numbered on the Map 5-3-17 are defined by the land use characteristics discussed in the preceding maps. Key focus nodes, intersections, and corridors within the character areas that have potential for redevelopment are noted on the map with the asterisks and dotted lines. For each Character Area, a brief description is provided as well as a focus for redevelopment efforts to prioritize framework elements for each area. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-67 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A cjRECOMMENDATIONS •.•• ......•......•.•..4...®0a*...*ma**.***9F.®a,...tr*0, Mini Triangle/Davis0 Shadowlawn • The Mini Triangle, including CRA-owned • Primarily a residential neighborhood with mix parcel, is a major commercial redevelopment of apartments/duplexes and single-family opportunity and Focus Development Node homes around Shadowlawn Elementary • Corridor commercial along Davis • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus • Linwood Avenue another potential area for Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between redevelopment. north and south sections of CRA area 4 i Airport Pulling .�� Tamiami i • Mix of corridor commercial, larger big-box • Corridor commercial and residences, style retail, and County Center including two major malls, Gulfgate Plaza and • Part of area currently designated as an Courthouse Shadows) Activity Center in Future Land Use Map • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area t 6 , 0 Windstar North Bayshore • Residential is primarily condos and single- • Focus Corridor along Bayshore Drive with family homes in gated communities neighborhood commercial (including • Includes golf course designated as a Haldeman Creek Entertainment District near commercial use Creek) • Mix of multi-and single-family residential • Focus Intersection at Bayshore/Thomasson Mkwith planned roundabout South Bayshore • CRA-owned Focus Development Node (17- • Primarily single-family residential Acre Site) neighborhood with Naples Botanical Garden • Wetland considerations for development ■ ■ ■ ■ Focus Corridor .j,Focus Development Node/Intersection 5-3-68 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 Q A t 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 7 c! < N BLVD ; i _ 5 A . •KWOOD r — - LINWOOD AVE 1 aur r 7 0 lir 1R 141/ - k, `'. i 1 _. to 1 U4 :/` r 41 f 4 I ' "".' illk, * w. 1 1t % !' 4 r , ,reg v -r / ,/.---7'7' L al: V \ — 1+ :-IP� > f lf. l i . . , 4:0 3. ec 14///Vas, 3.' 3 Sugden 'qR a Regional O 811/) m ,. Park 1;:, ' Lir, ,i--.....,',"--,'-''' - .,., : 1 �, 1N1 )RfzSCf O KAREN CQ, vJtr �. , .'� J sv tk'rt a.t.-{)gra j, Syk,... awes " � 1�� __ ¢ �> Bots cal �Q t u r �" ,atm A i z . andn , L iyviewss. w Park z i Alu:.:::::-.1,- 511Ct 4 vlic•. 'al[t •_ 7 ANDREWS AV,.....,:.72,...* 0 cagy Boundory , e, .Per r 31ATy ...::i. • :. rWetlands ': , 4 @t [j ctr of Na eaJr y LP"' Map 5-3-17: Character Areas Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-3-69 5.3 PLANNING G FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ;�F • Infill development on vacant residential lots . q.f(4r1a.,> 1 ;133) „31 )a3. • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets The following provides a focus of redevelopment for • Complete Street improvements along Shadow- each Character Area based on the specific characteris- lawn Drive tics described for Map 5-3-17 and the most relevant strategies. 3. Airport Pulling • Transitions between residential neighborhoods 1. Mini Triangle/Davis and commercial development Urban-style mixed use commercial redevelop- ; ment, including capitalization on the Mini Triangle • Eventual street enhancements, particularly con- ,,.1'.• nectivit across Airport PullingRd as a catalyst development site and urban-style Y P parking solutions • Commercial facade improvements • Park development at retention pond site 4. Tamiami • Complete Streets design and commercial redevel- • Connectivity to Downtown Naples via US 41 opment along Linwood Ave and other nearby • , commercial roadways; pedestrian scale street de Redevelopment of Courthouse Shadows sign between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, and the • Tenant opportunity at Gulfgate Plaza proposed retention pond park 5. Windstar i. • Improved access to Mini Triangle development • Complete Streets and MSTU improvements along ,, from US 41, Davis Blvd, and Linwood Ave major community roadways, including Bayshore • Multi-modal connectivity: Drive,Thomasson Drive, and Hamilton Avenue .fit' • Across Davis Blvd • Access to Bayview Park • Between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, pro- 6. North Bayshore posed retention pond park, and eastern • Corridor commercial development along Bayshore z Triangle neighborhood Drive, including Haldeman Creek Entertainment • To Downtown Naples potentially via Davis District near Creek and creative parking solutions 4 Blvd, US 41, and Gordon River Bridge im • LargerP redevelopmentopportunities of 17 Acre provements Site and Del's 24 property • Additional infrastructure improvements: sanitary • Arts and culture-oriented development sewers, electrical, stormwater • Transitional elements between corridor commer- 2. Shadowlawn cial and residential areas in along Bayshore Drive • Residential structural enhancement and upgrades and Thomasson Drive • Avoidance of incompatible uses • Development of vacant residential lots • Transitional elements between different uses • Complete Street design along Bayshore Drive and 5-3-70 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS b5.3 l y.r Thomasson Drive, including Bayshore Drive/ Thomasson Drive roundabout • Neighborhood Complete Streets and trails • Connections between Sugden Regional Park and CRA area • Water main and fire suppression upgrades • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets 7. South Bayshore • Mobile home and single-family home residential , improvements, upgrades, affordability • Development of vacant residential lots • Access to Bayview Park • Connections between CRA and uses to the east, including East Naples Community Park • Wetland,flooding, and site preparation considera- tions for development • Roadway improvements to meet County engineer- ing standards • Neighborhood Complete Streets v Wit Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 _5-3-71 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A ttt�t Y3` rr raR eF, This page is intentionally left blank. xF r 1 5-3-72 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 ... PRIORITIZATION PLAN . . ,f` °5�" x e "° t 2 is n kt,� A° s, `,.,\, r s ra ,,.. fi 'a t t . ' xa t„ + �R € as \a a F J „,,',A,.,,,4'4",„„.44.42- 0,,s',1Ia na baa- .s z � s Al'"='':;�.. � .:. ��<� '�,-. :� c'u5� �€ � �' is c�� s��^,* a'� �€� c�yLA4 �k' , :;` .sa ,,f;,,:,,+.. € ” S, eta-. to A° a s ay .. a a�� :�Y€ "�'' �Ra� �, �aAa �°y a � �,`,� °a 'sa�o-�� a e ��a°a ': tae�°��" .. . �• - „ ��?"�.�,,. �� i •; Ah.A s ,.,.w. 5� Sanki 0V . S lip �y tip:. 'ti t1 �,, / k ' ' -'''.>-?:,‹ .....,--''',,-'. --.... ' — .° ,','...,..s..- , -,- - ° °- . / ') 1' 1 ' I(4::!/'.4(':rf:',''''te,,,,,:i''''''''''.1-11-':..''''''''''.': f'-' �a x r I yah. r j{k. - (Z 7 i 7 I r e r ..ay as f ' f ' 5A .., ..,,, , . . „. . . :,,,,..i.,:„. .,. ., .„,.. .. . ..,.... . ., .. .4 ' f + - p PRIORITIZATION PLAN 9A 5.4.1 Prioritization of Projects 5.4.2 Financing Plan & Initiatives The primary funding source for the CRA is Tax Increment Financing(TIF) revenue generated by the The CRA will need to evaluate and implement or property within the CRA area.The Bayshore Gateway coordinate on a number of capital improvement Triangle CRA area is able to use County ad valorem tax projects and planning, administrative, and regulatory revenues generated above the base-year amount(the initiatives to carry out the framework of goals, increment)to apply to projects and initiatives objectives, and strategies presented in Section 5.3. identified in this Redevelopment Area Plan. Since these projects and initiatives cannot be Figure 5-4-1 shows the historic revenue trends and evaluated and carried out all at once,this section projected revenues through 2048 based on a low presents a prioritization plan in terms of amount of growth scenario that follows the County's historic funds programmed and project/initiative timing.A key growth trends with a 4.8%assumed growth rate, a consideration for prioritization is the amount of medium growth scenario that assumes a 5.2%growth funding available for these projects and initiatives, rate, and a high growth scenario that assumes a 5.7% discussed more in Section 5.4.2. Other prioritization growth rate. For more information on the criteria to consider that were primarily highlighted in development of growth scenarios, methods of the public outreach process include: revenue calculation, and detailed revenue tables, see • Funding availability from dedicated or outside Section 5.6. sources(aside from CRA funds) Certain parts of the CRA area are also designated as • Magnitude of anticipated impact and multiplier Municipal Service Taxing Units(MSTUs),which utilize effects an additional ad valorem tax for specific purposes. Whether planning has already been undertaken or The CRA can evaluate the opportunity to coordinate completed with the MSTUs to provide eligible projects proposed in this CRA plan. Other considerations that received sizable positive responses during the public outreach process The Bayshore Beautification MSTU,created in 1997, included: applies to most of the CRA area south of US 41 (see Map 5-4-1); revenues from this tax are focused on • Project timing considerations independent of streetscape and right-of-way improvements(including prioritization (e.g., Haldeman Creek dredging right-of-way maintenance),with some additional should account for timeframe of sediment build- provisions for use of funds on other public realm up,a stormwater master plan should be improvements in the MSTU area. Figure 5-4-2 shows completed before stormwater improvement projected revenues through 2048 using the same projects) growth scenarios developed for the TIF revenue • Ability to address health/safety concerns calculations(see Section 5.6 for more information and detailed revenue tables). Additional considerations recommended by the project team based on the Redevelopment Area Plan A Haldeman Creek MSTU (see Map 5-4-2)was created update process include: in 2006 for maintenance dredging and navigational marker maintenance within the MSTU boundary. • Degree of need Figure 5-4-3 shows projected revenues through 2048 • Geographic distribution of projects in the CRA using the same growth scenarios developed for the TIF area revenue calculations(see Section 5.6 for more information and detailed revenue tables). • Priorities identified during public outreach for the Redevelopment Area Plan Other potential funding sources that may be identified to supplement the funds above include grants and funding from partnerships(other agencies and private 5-4-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 N -DAVIS BLVD— a4 �_-- ----_ KIRKWOOD AVE a 7z LINWOOD AVE '' V 44, i J C VZIrti AIL 1 b. N 4IS C;ty:ofCL.,-..:' c Naples :— Q`` BARRETTj � - V it ii.-4;iiii S a iii/A44 Sugden 44-1 0 Srq� P Region al ... , ,_. .. �0Park�Z04,44 `: .2-r a .. , ..,_,... , ,',. ..1 THON1ASSON a Oyu KAREN _ do �ayv ew ' 1~ -t Park a 0 u /* a a' - t zi CRA 8oundcary a ANDREWS AVE "aesyshoi.Bsautillutioe M5t11r . Park t } Ott fie Wetland* s scc L:City of Naples :'j ▪ ` — :4 ▪ 0 4f � .� e r ; � net tri Map 5-4-1:Bayshore Beautification MSTU Area Note:includes a boundary extension on Thomasson east of the CRA boundary that was pending approval during the development of this Redevelop- ment Area Plan. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-4-2 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 9 A 514,000,000 2018: Base 512,000,000 Year 511,752,573 $10,000,000 10,030,748 $8 891 934 $8,000,000 56,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 2039 2041 2043 2045 2047 —Low —Medium --High Figure 5-4-1:CRA TIF Revenue Scenarios 55,000,000 $4 699 730 $4,500,000 .,.: , , „ $4,222,189 $4,000,000 • " 53,963,431 $3,500,000 ..•*^•""-' $3,000,000 $2,500,000 52,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 2039 2041 2043 2045 2047 —Low —Medium —High Figure 5-4-2:Bayshore Beau.f cation MSTU Revenue Scenarios $450,000 $400,0005411,760 5370,004 $350,000 $347,031 5300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 5100,000 550,000$50,000 $0 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 2039 2041 2043 2045 2047 —Low —Medium ---High Figure 5-4-3:Haldeman Creek MSTU Revenue Scenarios 5-4-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 3.4 rit... ..1. 1 DAVIS BLVD PA y� AKIRKWOOD AVE x LINW00D AVE z j v 8s4 ° 40 1401 i s' Ak 41 i , N1790 City-of '1 �� ;` A , Naples r Napl i BARRETT AVE cc CC - « 0 ,T, '.., Sugden xiSugden or °sf,4� o` a Regranal 4 .,. *' 841/6?t :4' :' Park THOMASSON DR D. z z 0 KAREN OR y • i r ? tut ,k "- 3 is 3 .; i b �v „ k slrr H- •• _ a . • tBaYwev a • ierg i ,we i Park v ° i - • o- ' ;� --' u: ANDREWS AVE,- C,CRaea�nt y t ;. ., r. ' .. .' ! n' Park anCreek MSTU s. Park litr ,, k .Y{t »: * 1. 4, 1 'fid Nkdands I .. 44; 'J cry of NaPNs a mak' s slkr '---...'..--4:-:•,(4,-;--,-.•.4 x _ - i J_ F tiak ...' Grp : - _... ,f,, •=. .ate, ,lu . 44 e Map 5-4-2:Haldeman Creek MSTU Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-4-4 5,4, ` PRIORITIZATION PLAN funders).There may also be opportunities in the 30-year plan period for various funds operating in the future to take on additional debt to pay for capital CRA area (including MSTUs). Note that following the projects with a plan for repayment. More information successful sale of the Mini Triangle property on coordination and partnerships, including those for funding opportunities, is discussed in Section 5.4.4. anticipated in the first five years, it is expected that the CRA will have additional funds of$350,000 available that are currently being held in reserve due 5.4.3 Projects & Initiatives to loan requirements. Figures 5-4-4 through 5-4-6 summarize capital and Prioritization non-capital project costs for different increments of Based on available funding and prioritization the 30-year plan period,followed by Tables 5-4-2 considerations, the following sets out the phasing for through 5-4-4 which provide a detailed list of projects recommended projects and initiatives with and initiatives.Table 5-4-5 compares projected descriptions. Note that the sunset date for the TIF revenues to estimated costs to show deficits and Trust Fund is in 2060(42 years), while the funding surpluses. Note that the capital planning includes a timeframe for this plan is for 30 years through 2048 . built-in deficit to indicate where other agencies would Additionally,this plan should be re-evaluated regularly likely help fund projects or other revenue sources (e.g., every five years)to keep it relevant and updated might be sought. Regarding maintenance costs, ii if redevelopment circumstances evolve. maintenance of standard capital improvements is anticipated to be provided and funded by relevant This Plan does not obligate any funding to any projects County agencies, while maintenance for capital listed.This Plan provides a guide and list of both improvements above and beyond County standards capital and non-capital projects that tax increment are anticipated to be funded by the CRA. revenues can fund if approved by the CRA and allocated through the standard operating and Short Term (1-5 years) procurement guidelines adopted by the Collier County Capital Projects Board of Commissioners. Projects may require 0'4 • Linwood Ave Complete Street Phase I—major additional vetting and piloting to better understand Complete Street improvement between ji technical feasibility, impacts, and broader County Commercial Dr and Wild Pines Ln including on- implementation priorities prior to approval for street parking, lighting, sidewalk widening, and implementation.To this end, planned projects include any additional needed infrastructure technical feasibility studies and pilot projects.As a improvements result, this capital and non-capital funding plan is a Thomasson Dr and Hamilton Ave Improvements— subject to change as it is re-evaluated. Additionally, Bayshore Beautification MSTU anticipated to fund the Plan sets a framework based on current conditions project, but any shortfall could trigger partnership but also allows for flexibility in the phasing of projects with CRA funding portion based on funding opportunities and community Republic Dr Complete Streets Improvements— priorities identified in annual work plans and capital neighborhood level Complete Streets �s improvement project lists. improvements between Bayshore Dr and East Table 5-4-1 summarizes projected revenues for the Naples Community Park, including lighting, 5-4-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLANS .AS•4 possible sidewalk expansion, any necessary • Gateway Intersection Design Improvements at US drainage improvements, and an improved 41/Shadowlawn Dr/Bayshore Dr—sign ~; pedestrian bridge connection to East Naples improvements in the right-of-way and median Community Park areas with an opportunity to showcase public art s • Danford St Complete Streets Improvements— • Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements in CRA area neighborhood-level Complete Streets —signs to address branding and bicycle/pedestrian : improvements between the end of the roadway movement e" and Hamilton Ave • Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Program—program • General Parks Improvements in Bayshore Area— to address gaps in the pedestrian and bicycle general item to address connections to parks and infrastructure networks that are not addressed . amenities, including any associated with the 17- through Complete Streets improvements Acre Site and Sugden Regional Park • Other General Multi-Modal Improvements—for • Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood additional multi-modal amenities(e.g., bus Initiatives General Improvements—general item to shelters) F address capital improvements from Community • Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/ Safety&Clean-Up Strategy and Neighborhood Improvements Focus Initiatives; may include projects identified • Sanitary Sewer Line Upgrades in Triangle Area—to y based on neighborhood interest to coordinate with increase capacity the Sheriff's Department and Code Enforcement to • Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades—to educate and provide small capital improvements address infrastructure age and flow requirements • Land Acquisition for a Community Land Trust—may Non-Capital Expenditures support maintenance of current affordable housing . Ongoing Operating Expenses for CRA, including availability in the CRA area while improving staff and administration costs baseline quality conditions; may also support • Process Improvements—updated bylaws for CRA housing for artists Advisory Board �a. • Bay St Complete Street Improvements— • Land Development Code Updates-based on neighborhood level Complete Streets recommendations from CRA Plan Update �` improvements between Hamilton Ave and the end . Mini Triangle Development—funding for incentives of the roadway and other needed support for the development of • Surface Parking Lot in Bayshore Area—to increase the Mini Triangle available commercial parking • 17-Are Development—funding for incentives and ,;. • General Road Engineering Improvements on Pine other needed support for the development of the :, Tree Dr and Andrews Dr—to bring these roadways 17-Acre Site. upto minimum Countystandards Gateway Property Development—funding for • Jeepers Dr Complete Street Improvements— potential incentive in support of the project at the neighborhood Complete Streets improvements apex of Davis Boulevard and Us 41. between Bayshore Dr and Sugden Regional Park, • Stormwater Master Plan Update—identify primary, including walk lane striping, upgraded bioswales, secondary, and tertiary improvements needed in lighting, and a pedestrian connection to Sugden the CRA area with a prioritization plan 1k Regional Park Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-4-6 9 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 9 A • Arts and Culture Plan for CRA Area with exterior façade and structural x' • Complete Streets Implementation Plan improvements • Bayview Parking Study—concepts and outreach in • Wall & Fence Funding—for transitional coordination with Parks & Recreation Division structures between incompatible uses • Community Safety&Cleanup Strategy—strategy to • Public Art Funding—for public art pieces and events address code enforcement issues and community • Economic Development Incentives Program—for �: safety economic development incentives related to • Branding Strategy Section 5.3.4 of the Redevelopment Area Plan i. • Marketing and Communication Strategy— • Bayshore Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study Mobile Home strategies to communicate outcomes from the Replacement Fund -for transition of A ' branding effort and connect with the various mobile homes to modular homes or other ` . communities in the CRA area (including hard-to- appropriate structures reach groups) with updated tools including the • Community Land Trust Housing Construction website, e-blast templates, marketing materials, • Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments etc. • Market Study/Economic Profile Mid Term (6-15 years) • Bayshore Dr Pilot project—for Complete Street Capital Projects implementation • Triangle Retention Pond Improvements- i. • Water& Fire Update Strategy—documentation of implementation of passive park improvements at what mains and hydrants will be updated and the pond site with any necessary drainage and phasing connectivity improvements • Triangle Retention Pond Feasibility Study—finalized • Land Acquisition for Two Pocket Parks (small design and engineering for passive park neighborhood parks) improvements • Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood • Other Non-Capital Operations and Study Initiatives General Improvements Expenditures—may include a study to expand the • Land Acquisition for a Community Land Trust -' CRA boundary, non-capital costs associated with • Surface Parking Lot in the Mini Triangle area to Community Safety 84 Clean-Up Plan, non-capital support commercial uses %r£' costs from Neighborhood Focus Initiatives, or other • Development of Multi-Purpose Facility/Structure— * expenditures that may arise in the future and are may occur on currently CRA-owned 17-Acre Site; a not yet identified. potential uses of the facility/structure may include • Grants and Programs a CRA office and/or arts/incubator space • Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail-along Sugden • Residential Grant/Loan Programs—for structural improvements to single-family Regional Park Drainage Ditch to provide north/ homes south connectivity g • Commercial Parking Garage on Bayshore Dr- • Commercial Facade Program—for areas , that are not a major focus for commercial possibly on surface lot included in short-term redevelopment but that can be enhanced capital projects for commercial parking F 5-4-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN • Bayshore Dr Complete Street—major Complete Non-Capital Expenditures Street improvement between US 41 and �4 P Ongoing Operating Expenses for CRA Thomasson Dr, including possible lane reduction, • Land Development Code Updates on-street parking, and any additional needed • Bayshore Dr Technical Feasibility Study—for infrastructure improvements P Complete Street implementation • Kirkwood Ave Complete Street—Complete Street • Microenterprise and Arts Incubator Study—for �° improvement potentially similar to Linwood Ave concepts and implementation, which could include Phase I with potential Shadowlawn Dr connection an arts focus and/or arts space •%. • Commercial Dr Complete Street—Complete Street • Other Non-Capital Operations and Study improvement potentially similar to Linwood Ave Expenditures—other expenditures that may arise _.' Phase I in the future and are not yet identified • Linwood Ave Complete Street Phase II— • Grants and Programs - neighborhood Complete Street improvements • Residential Grant/Loan Programs—for between Wild Pines Ln and Airport-Pulling Rd structural improvements to single-family • Shadowlawn Dr Complete Street—major roadway homes Complete Street improvement between Davis Blvd • Commercial Facade Program—for areas and US 41, including lighting and any additional that are not a major focus for commercial needed infrastructure improvements P redevelopment but that can be enhanced ', , : • Gateway Intersection Design Improvements— with exterior facade and structural signage and potential public art opportunities for: improvements • Davis Blvd/Airport-Pulling Rd • Wall & Fence Funding—for transitional • Davis Blvd/Shadowlawn Dr structures between incompatible uses • Davis Blvd/US 41 • Public Art Funding—for public art pieces • Thomasson Dr Dominion Dr / and events ,4 • US 41/Osceola Ave • Economic Development Incentives • General Road Engineering Improvements—to bring Program—for economic development the following roads up to minimum County incentives related to Section 5.3.4 of the standards: Redevelopment Area Plan • Woodside Ave • Mobile Home Replacement Fund -for • Holly Ave transition of mobile homes to modular .. • Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Program homes or other appropriate structures • Other General Multi-Modal Improvements • Community Land Trust Housing • Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades—to Construction i, address age and flow requirements g q Other Affordable/Workforce Housing • Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/ Investments Improvements il • Undergrounding Utilities along Bayshore Dr— between US 41 and Thomasson Dr, coordinated 0. with the Complete Streets project and Bayshore Beautification MSTU Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-4-8 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 9A Long Term (16-30 years) • Other Non-Capital Operations and Study Expenditures—other expenditures that may arise Capital Projects in the future and are not yet identified • Bayshore Dr Complete Street Improvement • Grants and Programs between Thomasson Dr and Holly Ave— • Residential Grant/Loan Programs—for structural neighborhood-level Complete Street, including any improvements to single-family homes drainage improvements and connections to • Commercial Facade Program—for areas that are potential Naples Bay Greenway Sun Trail not a major focus for commercial redevelopment improvements but that can be enhanced with exterior facade and • Commercial Parking Garage in Mini Triangle Area structural improvements possibly on Surface Lot included in Mid Term • Wall & Fence Funding—for transitional structures Capital Projects—to address commercial parking between incompatible uses needs • Public Art Funding—for public art pieces and events • Pine Street Connection—between Davis Blvd and • Economic Development Incentives Program—for Linwood Ave economic development incentives related to • Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Program Section 5.3.4 of the Redevelopment Area Plan • Other General MultiModal Improvements • Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments • Land Acquisition and Development of 4 Pocket Parks(small neighborhood parks) • Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements • Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades—to address infrastructure age and flow requirements • Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/ Improvements • Underground/Relocate Overhead Utility Lines— Linwood Ave and Commercial Dr • General Road Engineering Improvements—to bring the following roads up to minimum County standards: • Palmetto Ct • Undergrounding Utilities along Bayshore Dr— between Thomasson Dr and Holly Ave, coordinated with Complete Streets project and Bayshore Beautification MSTU Non-Capital Expenditures • Ongoing Operating Expenses for CRA • Land Development Code Updates 5-4-9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 Short Term Total Mid Term Total Long Term Total Fund Revenue Total (1-5 Yrs) (6-15 Yrs) (16-30 Yrs) Tax Increment Financing(TIF) $10,831,197 $39,256,457 $104,330,124 $154,417,778 Bayshore Beautification MSTU $7,403,290 $20,956,845 $48,857,829 $77,217,964 Haldeman Creek MSTU $644,865 $1,831,442 $4,277,648 $6,753,955 Table 5-4-1:Summary of Projected Revenue Estimates Total Short-Term Costs Total Long-Term Costs (1-5 Years): (16-30 Years): $25.0 million $74.5 million Public Space.Parks.&Open Pub%Space,Parks,&Open Space, ,4,'d Use&Urban Design,$120,000,1% 51,050,000,4% Land Use&Urban Space,51,851.909,2% DenOr,S0,0% _..Development$O, ,.;. Development, 0% $1,000,000,4% , 2f 913;.91',.25 ..,... 1ur.C.ap.ef. .,..1.0.111..-193% Figure 5-4-4:Short-term costs by project type Figure 5-4-6:Long-term costs by project type Total Mid-Term Costs (6-15 Years): $57.9 million Publ.Space,Parks,&Open Land Use&Urban Space,$1,233,855,2% Design.$86,250,0=4 Development $3,250,000.6% T,1``Dot tat on, Connect Lvalkab,.9. 575,279,039,4495 094''..43. Figure 5-4-5:Mid-term project costs by type Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-4-10 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN :, 9 A ?' North of US 41(Triangle) '• . Mid-Term ✓. Land Use&Urban Design Projects Total Short Term(1-5 Years) i Long Term(16-30 Years) (6-15 Years) $: Gateway Intersection Design Improvements Gateway Sign-Davis Blvd/Airport Pulling Rd $17,250 $17,250 Gateway Sign-Davis Blvd/Shadowlawn Dr $17,250 $17,250 Gateway Sign-Davis Blvd/US 41 $17,250 $17,250 ll �:: Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements Wayfinding Sign Improvements $52,500 $52,500li Sub-Total $104,250 $52,500 $51,750 $0 Mid-Term Public Space,Parks,&Open Space Projects Total Short Term(1-5 Years) tm Long Term(16-30 Years)2 r4's: (6-15 Years) ,, Park Improvements 1 1. Triangle Retention Pond Improvements $752,605 $752,605 ,, , Land Acquisition for Pocket Parks(2 parks) $918,750 5431,250 $487,500 Development of Pocket Parks(2 parks) $169,705 $169,705 �)- Public Space Improvements , Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood $75,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 ' Initiatives General Improvements c rc' Sub-Total $2,916,060 $25,000 : $1,208,855 : $682,205 Transportation,Connectivity,&Waikability Projects Total Short Term(1-5 Years) Mid-Term(6-15 Years)' Long Term(16-30 Years)2 ,y; Complete Streets-Major Linwood Ave.(Phase I) $1,925,186 $1,925,186 Shadowlawn Drive-Installation of Streetlights $379,500 $379,500 Commercial Drive $1,750,961 $1,750,961 '''' Kirkwood Ave./Kirkwood Ave Connection $2,003,588 $2,003,588 Pine Street Connection $2,299,326 $2,299,326 Complete Streets&Trails-Neighborhood Linwood Ave.(Phase II) I $2,046,4481 I $2,046,4481 `a" Parking Surface Parking Lot-Land Acquisition $862,500 $862,500 = Y/ Surface Parking Lot-Mini Triangle Area-excludes land '•` acquisition cost $351,290 $351,290 Commercial Parking Garage(possibly on surface lot)- $12,374,050 512,374,050 ��.,. Triangle-excludes land acquisition cost .r. General Mutli-Modal Improvements 4 General Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements $2,747,555 $430,622 $932,931 $1,384,002 Other General Multi-Modal Improvements $862,500 $250,000 $287,500 $325,000 a , Sub-Total $27,602,904 $2,605,808 $8,614,718 $16,382,379 Table 5-4-2:Capital Improvements Project Matrix-North of US 41(Triangle) :a> � k r4; !, ^t 5-4-11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-Draft March 2019 L, PRIORITIZATION PLAN 9A . Infrastructure Projects Total Short Term(1-5 Years) Mid-Term t Long Term(16-30 Years)' t' {6-15 Years) s Other Infrastructure Improvements Upgrade Sanitary Sewer Lines $1,000,000 $1,000,000 a` Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/Improvements $5,825,000 $250,000 $575,000 $5,000,000 Fix Underground Utility Lines-Linwood Avenue $931,913 $931,913 Underground Utility Lines-Commercial Drive $247,443 $247,443 Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades $4,038,023 5482,801 5555,222 $3,000,000 Sub-Total $12,042,379 $1,732,801 $1,130,222 $9,179,356 Total North $43,665,594 $4,916,110 $11,505,545 $26,243,939 overall period costs increased by 15%to ace r a �,�s Overall period costs increased by 30%to account`or annual increases Table 5-4-2(continued):Capital Improvements Project Matrix—North of US 41(Triangle) 1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-4-12 I 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 9A South of US 41(Bayshore) Mid-Term Land Use&Urban Design Projects Total Short Term(1-5 Years) 1 Long Term(16-30 Yea raj' (6-15 Years) Gateway Intersection Design Improvements .r Gateway Sign Improvements at US 41 and Bayshore3 $15,000 $15,000 i Gateway-Thomasson Dr/Dominion Dr; $17,250 $17,250 Gateway US 41/Osceola' $17,250 $17,250 Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements Wayfinding Sign Improvements3 $52,500 $52,500 Sub-Total $102,000 $67,500 $34,500 $0 Mid-Term Public Space,Parks,&Open Space Projects Total Short Term(1-5 Years) ' Long Term(16-30 Years)" (6-15 Years) Park Improvements Land Acquisition for Pocket Parks(2 parks) $975,000 $975,000 Development of Pocket Parks(2 parks) $169,705 $169,705 General Parks Development/Improvements $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Public Space Improvements Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood $75,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Initiatives General Improvements Sub-Total $2,219,705 $1,025,000 $25,000 $1,169,705 Development Projects Total Short Term(1-5 Years) Mid-Term(6-15 Years)' Long Term(16-30 Years)1 Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust $1,000,000 5500,000 $500,000 Development of Multi-Purpose Facility/Structure $2,250,000 $2,250,000 Sub-Total $3,250,000 $500,000 $2,750,000 $0 Table 5-4-3:Capitol Improvements South of US 41(Bayshore) 5-4-13 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 Mid-Term Transportation,Connectivity,&Walkability Projects Total Short Term(1-5 Years) 3 long Term(16-30 Years)2 (6-15 Years) Complete Streets-Major Bayshore Drive Complete Street—between US 41 and Thomasson' $2,875,000 $2,875,000 Thomason Drive and Hamilton Improvements3 $500,000 $500,000 Complete Streets&Trails-Neighborhood Bicycle and pedestrian trail along Sugden drainage ditch' 5394,073 $394,073 Jeepers Drive Complete Street Improvements3 $491,849 $491,849 Republic Drive Complete Streets improvements' $506,849 $506,849 Danford Street Complete Streets' $689,329 $689,329 Bay Street Complete Street Improvements3 $491,849 $491,849 Bayshore Drive Complete Street-Thomasson Dr/Holly Ave' $2,600,000 $2,600,000 Parking Surface Parking Lot at Bayshore and Coco $351,290 $351,290 Commercial Parking Garage(possibly on surface lot)— $11,377,525 $11,377,525 Bayshore Drive General Road Engineering Standard Improvements General Road Engineering Improvements—Pine Tree Drive' $346,649 $346,649 General Road Engineering Improvements-Andrews Drive' $346,649 $346,649 General Road Engineering Improvements-Woodside $398,647 $398,647 r- Avenue General Road Engineering Improvements-Holly Avenue' $398,647 $398,647 General Road Engineering Improvements-Palmetto $221,905 $221,905 Court' General Multi-Modal Improvements General Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements3 $2,747,555 $430,622 $932,931 $1,384,002 Other General Multi-Modal Improvements3 $862,500 $250,000 $287,500 $325,000 Sub-Total 525,600,317 $4,405,088 $16,664,322 $4,530,908 Table 5-4-3(continued):Capital Improvements South of US 41(Bayshore) 5, as Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-4-14 µz 5.4 1 PRIORITIZATION PLAN - 9 A FI Infrastructure Projects Total Short Term(1-5 Years) Mid-Term (6-15 Years)' Long Term(16-30 Years)` Other Infrastructure Improvements IStormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/Improvements3 $5,150,000 $250,000- $2,300,000 $2,600,000 Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades $6,317,221 $1,542,894 $1,774,328 $3,000,000 Underground Utility Lines-Bayshore Drive $2,220,000 $1,430,000 $790,000 Sub-Total $13,687,221 $1,792,894— $5,504,328 $6,390,000 Total South $44,859,243 $7,790,481 $24,978,149 $12,090,612 1 Overall Capital Costs Total $88,524,836 $12,706,591 $36,483,694 $38,334,552 Non-Capital Costs Total $69,915,363 $12,315,280 $21,449,912 $36,150,171 Total Costs $158,440,199 $25,021,871 $57,933,606 $74,484,723 'Overall period costs increased by 15%to account for annual increases 2 Overall period costs increased by 30%to account for annual increases 3 Potentially MSTU-eligible project;requires coordination and approval of Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory Board. Table 5-4-3(continued):Capital Improvements South of US 41(Bayshore) i j 1 5-4-15 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 Q A PRIORITIZATION PLR I Non-Capital Expenditures(Studies,Plans,Other) Operations and Studies Project Total Short Term Mid-Term ,. , (1-5 Years) (6-15 Years) (16-30 Years) z_ Process Improvements-updated bylaws for CRA Advisory Board $25,000 $25,000 Staff and Operating(salaries,benefits,rent,etc.) $53,625,363 $7,110,280 $14,714,912 $31,800,171 Land Development Code Updates-based on recommendations from CRA Plan Update $100,000 $25,000 $25,000 $50,000 Mini Triangle Development Support $500,000 $500,000 17-Acre Development Support $500,000 $500,000 Gateway Property Support $100,000 $100,000 Stormwater Master Plan Update $200,000 $200,000 Arts and Culture Plan for CRA $75,000 $75,000 Complete Streets Implementation Plan $50,000 $50,000 Bayview Parking Study-concepts and outreach in coordination with Parks&Recreation $25,000 $25,000 Division Community Safety&Cleanup Strategy to address code enforcement issues and community $15,000 $15,000 safety. Marketing,Branding and communication strategy-website update,a-blast templates, «, marketing materials,etc. $50,000 $50,000 Market Study/Economic Profile $50,000 $50,000 Bayshore Drive Technical Feasibility Study $40,000 $40,000 Bayshore Drive Pilot project $15,000 $15,000 Water&Fire Update Strategy-document what mains and hydrants will be updated and - $50,000 $50,000 phasing Triangle Retention Pond Feasibility Study $25,000 $25,000 Microenterprise and arts incubator Study for concepts and implementation $20,000 $20,000 Other non-capital operations and study expenditures 5750,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 F� Grants and Programs } Project Total Short Term Mid-Term 1 long Term (1-5 Years) (6-15 Years) (16-30 Years) 2 Residential Grant/Loan Programs-for structural improvements to single-family homes $750,000 $125,000 $250,000 $375,000 Commercial Facade Program $1,500,000 $250,000 $500,000 $750,000 Wall&Fence Funding-for funding transitional structures between incompatible uses $750,000 $125,000 $250,000 $375,000 Public Art-funding for public art pieces and events $450,000 $75,000 $150,000 $225,000 Economic Development-funding for economic development incentives listed in Development Section $750,000 $125,000 $250,000 $375,000 Mobile Home Replacement Fund $1,500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 k Community Land Trust Housing Construction $4,800,000 $1,800,000 $3,000,000 Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments $3,200,000 $250,000 $1,000,000 $1,950,000 Totals $69,915,363 $12,315,280 $21,449,912 $36,150,171 'Overall period costs increased by 15%to account for annual increases 2 Overall period costs increased by 30%to account for annual increases Table 5-4-4:Non Capital Expenditures Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-Draft March 2019 5-4-16 5- 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN '';...al Short-Term Mid-Term Long Term TIF Funding Summary Total Overall Z (1-5 Years) (6-15 Years) (16-30 Years) Total Capital Costs-North of US 41(Triangle) $42,665,594 $4,916,110 $11,505,545 $26,243,939 Total Capital Costs-South of US 41(Bayshore) $44,859,243 $7,790,481 $24,978,149 $12,090,612 33' Total Capital Costs $87,524,836 $12,706,591 $36,483,694 $38,334,552 2. Total Non-Capital Costs $69,915,363 $12,315,280 $21,449,912 $36,150,171 L Total TIF Revenue $154,417,778 $10,831,197 $39,256,457 $104,330,124 Difference -$3,022,421 -$14,190,674 -$18,677,149 $29,845,401 1 Overall period costs increased by 15%to account for annual increases 2 Overall period costs increased by 3D%to account for annual increases Table 5-4-5:Summary of CRA Project Costs and Projected TIF Revenues • 5.4.4 Coordination & Partnerships 4, Many of the items listed in the Section 5.3 framework and capital and non-capital projects listed in this section require the CRA to seek approval from and coordinate with other agencies and entities,which may include planning and process approval and/or coordination and identifying opportunities for shared funding. Coordination also includes instances in which another agency or entity oversees a project or initiative directly with the CRA assisting. As mentioned in Section 5.4.3,the framework and projects identified in this plan are suggestions to be further vetted prior to approval for implementation.This includes review and approval from relevant County staff and elected officials. Planning and implementation may also include broader coordination with agencies. Examples include coordination with the Collier MPO to share local needs that might inform a state roadway improvement, as well as coordinating with other Collier County agencies on topics such as Land Development Code changes, park access, community safety, transit and transportation, and stormwater.The CRA also has opportunities to coordinate with the City of Naples on transportation planning and water main upgrades.This type of coordination might involve design review for projects led by the CRA and setting up meetings coinciding with regular planning and project cycles prior to finalized design phases. Key planning cycles for coordination include the Transportation Improvement Program planning by the MPO and capital improvement planning for Collier County. When working with agencies to identify shared funding opportunities as a part of these planning and implementation processes, it is important to recognize existing funding commitments, as well as limitations on 'f ' the use of funds. For example, road impact fees in Collier County must be used for capacity expansion, such as adding a new road or new lanes to an existing road. Aside from government agencies, the CRA may also have opportunities to partner with local entities such as private firms and non-profits to realize some of its strategies and projects, as well as seek private sponsorships Examples include potentially partnering with the Naples Accelerator, St. Matthew's House, and/or the United Arts Council on a business/art incubator idea.There may also be opportunities to partner with companies such as Slidr for alternative vehicle transportation in the area. Coordination and funding opportunities may also be identified as part of private development projects. 5-4-17 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A PRIORITIZATION PLAN Lastly, as mentioned at the beginning of this section, the CRA should look for opportunities to coordinate with the MSTUs operating in the area to implement capital improvements.Table 5-4-6 shows the costs for projects in the CRA prioritization plan that may qualify for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds and compares them to the projected revenues for the MSTU. The comparison shows that the money available would cover these project costs with a sizable amount of funds remaining for other MSTU projects. Note that the MSTU Advisory Board would need to approve any process or funding • coordination. MSTU Funding Summary Total Overall Short-Term Mid-Term 3 Long Term i (1-5 Years) (6-15 Years) (16-30 Years) Total Capital Costs-MSTU-Eligible Projects $13,973,502 $4,121,297 $5,321,297 $4,530,908 a. Total Right-of-Way MSTU Revenue $77,217,964 $7,403,290 $20,956,845 $48,857,829 Difference $63,244,462 $3,281,993 $15,635,548 $44,326,921 'Overall period costs increased by 15%to account for annual increases 'Overall period costs increased by 30%to account for annual increases Note:Projects are considered MSTU-eligible based on those that align with accepted uses of Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds according to Ordinance No.2013-68 Table 5-4-6:Summary of MSTU-Eligible Costs and Projected MSTU Revenues sk x YS" �V y�. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-4-18 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 9 7 A A ggF��w: £i l s fit°£ ,i. k, This page is intentionally left blank. v: �$f fit Lam. 5-4-19 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9A s..$ GE I A', .... ^^� r {P a 1 m omyy, .,, . ' .� } • d! t %•- ;h- .,..,. ....,... . „,iA»... wig ' ` .' a^r w . • ,... , �' r k 5 • 5f . ; F ' ��av r r R z ' h d e r b w ) p �'� ,.- a „+; 4-� A OW N4ip- GENERAL REQUIREMENTS "rte :. 5.5.1 Overview of Relevant development and providing identified needed public �;, uses. If a property is designated for acquisition,the « process must comply with County requirements and/ �� Statutes , or State statutes. f ��..t; Community Aii: redevelopment areas are created on the tifO �. basis of a finding of blight or slum conditions, as noted The Redevelopment Agency is authorized to demolish, , clear,or move buildings, structures, and other in Section 163.355 of Florida Statute.Table 5-2-1 l provided detailed blight conditions for the Bayshore improvements from any real property acquired in the `K° Gateway Triangle CRA area, summarizing information redevelopment project area,subject to obtaining oifft from the 2000 Plan.Table 5-5-1 shows how the necessary permits. framework in this Redevelopment Area Plan addresses The CRA may also engage in or assist in site o ; the main blight factors identified. Related capital and preparation improvements on properties it already *V non-capital projects can also be found in Section 5.4. owns or properties it acquires in the future to w, facilitate development. Other improvements include In addition, sections 163.360 and 163.362 of Florida Statutes contain specific requirements for community general infrastructure and streetscape improvements . redevelopment plans.Tables 5-5-2 and 5-5-3 provide that indirectly support development.See Section 5.4.3 „*.,:x for overview of the requirements from these statutes those improvements that are planned for the CRA and the location in this Redevelopment Area Plan to fund.All of these improvements are subject to where the relevant information can be found to satisfy obtaining necessary permits. iiiPi- these requirements. Section 1.5 further outlines the Agency's authoritiesr that governs this area. �fE 5.5.2 Consistency with the i 5.5.4 Zoning & Comprehensive o County's Comprehensive Plan01e4 ' This Redevelopment Area Plan sets forth a vision for Plan Changes Hlthe CRA area centered on fostering more urban-style No Growth Management Plan or Land Development o tioidevelopment, including multi-modal corridors, mixed Code changes were brought through an approval use projects, and building out to allowable densities. process as part of this planning effort, and no Land P The Collier County Growth Management Plan largely Development Code or Comprehensive Plan changes supports this vision with the Bayshore Gateway are being adopted with the adoption of this a Triangle Redevelopment Overlay provisions and the Redevelopment Area Plan. However, recommended 'V-_Y. Activity Center designation.The Mixed Use overlays changes will be brought for initial consistency review gv provided in the Land Development Code further by Collier County staff and the Collier County Planning r3 support these efforts. Development and Commission following adoption of this plan. Ilk redevelopment are thus largely intended to be completed within the provisions of the Growth 5.5.5 Land Use, Densities, & WManagement Plan as they exist now or indicate where elit future amendments may be needed in order to carry Building Requirements IA out implementation of action items. As noted in Section 5.5.4, no Land Development Code or Comprehensive Plan changes are being adopted OW'r 5.5.3 Acquisition, Demolition/ with the adoption of this Redevelopment Area Plan. Consequently,the Redevelopment Area Plan will *Eta: -; Clearance, & Improvement follow the land uses, densities, and building In the future,the Redevelopment Agency maychoose requirements provided in the Growth Management 4406 to pursue a program of property acquisition and/or Plan and the Land Development Code for the time consolidation to realize the redevelopment objectives. being. However, recommended changes will be These objectives might relate to facilitating private brought forth for initial consistency review by Collier , 5-5-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019I GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 9 A Main Issue Relevant Plan Section(s) Predominance of Section 5.3.5 addresses street design primarily with Complete Streets initiatives; defective or inadequate there are additional improvements for addressing bicycle and pedestrian gaps, street layout commercial parking need, and additional bicycle and pedestrian connections. Section 5.3.4 focuses on specifically on facilitating private development. As part of Faulty lot layout in these efforts,the CRA can acquire property to merge lots and make them more relation to size, easily developed. Additionally, Section 5.3.2 lays out examples of multi-family adequacy,accessibility, residential that provide examples to achieve higher residential densities where or usefulness approved densities are not realized. Sections 5.3.3 and 5.3.4 contain strategies to address structural upgrades and public realm clean-up and improvements.Sections 5.3.2 and 5.3.4 also address residential Unsanitary or unsafe types and approaches to affordability that can address overcrowding. Section 5.3.5 conditions °sem highlights lighting and other transportation safety improvements, particularly for cyclists and pedestrians. Deterioration of site or other improvements Section 5.3.6 focuses on infrastructure improvements, including those for (drainage and surface stormwater. water management) Other problems: Lack of right-of-way for4,` Section 5.3.5 includes improvements for Shadowlawn Drive. Shadowlawn Drive improvements Other problems: Lack of Section 5.3.5 includes a coordination strategy for public transit in the CRA area. public transportation Other problems: housing Section 5.3.4 includes example strategies to address housing affordability issues. affordability ,.• Table 5-5-1:Sections of Redevelopment Area Plan that address blight conditions y Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-5-2 5. 9 A GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Section 163.360,F.S. Requirements Relevant Redevelopment Area Plan Section Conformity to the Growth Management Plan Section 5.5.2 Zoning and planning changes Section 5.5.4 Section 5.3.1, Maps 5-3-5 and 5- Land uses, maximum densities, and building requirements 3-6, Section 5.5.5;for general considerations to guide these requirements, see Section 5.3.2 Land acquisition, demolition, clearance and site preparation, redevelopment, improvements, and rehabilitation proposed to carry out Sections 5.4.3 and 5.5.3 the Redevelopment Area Plan Affordable housing provision Section 5.3.4-Objective 5 Table 5-5-2:Section 163.360,F.S.Requirements for Redevelopment Area Plan 1 a x 5-5-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 9 A GENERAL REQUIREMENTS C Section 163.362, F.S. Requirements Relevant Redevelopment Area Plan Section Legal description of CRA area boundaries and reason behind establishing Resolution 2000 82, Exhibit A at end of this document and such boundaries Resolution 2000-83 Approximate amount of open space to be provided shown by diagram and Section 5.3.3-Table 5-3-1 and in general terms Map 5-3-8 Property intended for parks and recreation space shown by diagram and in Section 5.3.3-Map 5-3-8 general terms Street layout and property intended for streets shown by diagram and in general terms Section 5.3.5-Map 5-3-14 Section 5.3.1, Maps 5-3-5 and 5- Limitations on the type, size, height, number, and proposed use of 3-6, Section 5.5.5;for general buildings shown by diagram and in general terms considerations to guide these requirements, see Section 5.3.2 The approximate number of dwelling units shown by diagram and in Section 5.3.2 Map 5-3-2 general terms Replacement housing and relocation Section 5.3.4, Section 6 Property intended for public utilities shown by diagram and in general Section 5.3.6-Maps 5-3-15 and 5 terms -3-16 Section 5.3.1-Map 5-3-1, ¢ Section 5.4.2; additional details Property for public improvements of any nature shown by diagram and in in Section 5.3.2 Map 5-3-7, Section 5.3.3-Map 5-3-8,Section general terms gyp= 5.3.4-Map 5-3-10,Section 5.3.5- Maps 5-3-12 and 5-3-14, Section 5.3.6-Maps 5-3-15 and 5-3-16 a Neighborhood impact element describing impacts on residents of CRA area and surrounding areas in terms of relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilities and services, Section 5.5.6 effect on school population, and other matters affecting the physical and , social quality of the neighborhood Publicly funded capital improvements to be undertaken in the CRA area Section 5.4.2 Safeguards, controls, restrictions/covenants Section 5.5.7 Replacement housing for relocation of displaced persons from housing Section 6 facilities Section 5.3.2, Section 5.3.4- "`'`" Residential use element Objective 5 Projected costs of redevelopment Section 5.4.3 Redevelopment Area Plan duration and time certain for redevelopment Section 1.6 financed by increment revenues Table 5-5-3:Section163.362,F.S.Requirements for Redevelopment Area Plan 4k4ap r'„ Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-5-4 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS stag.. F:a • County staff and the Collier County Planning existing Collier County process to assess and mitigate Commission. for Level of Service changes. . Regarding environmental quality,water quality is a key t 4 consideration for stormwater management ssvSs 5.5.6 Neighborhood Impact improvements.Water quality impacts can be evaluated itS sits sthrough existing Collier County processes.Additionally, - The Redevelopment Area Plan focuses on improving this Redevelopment Area Plan encourages green A '' structural quality of buildings, compatibility of uses, infrastructure techniques that may help rovide certain and urban design, as well as promoting more urban- levels of localized water treatment and ground t.S31, style development and multi-modal transportation.As infiltration prior to arriving at major collector sites. of right now, there is housing available at lower income „. levels,yet this may be due to lower structural quality siissisq - based on findings from the background analysis for the Controls, 7 5 5 Redevelopment Area Plan.As improvements are madeSafeguards, in the area,there is a potential risk of property values Restrictions, & Assurances to make housing substantially less affordable. 40, Consequently, protective measures are being Redevelopment activities identified in this considered to maintain the affordability of these units Redevelopment Area Plan will not be initiated until tattf while improving their quality(see Section 5.3.4, they are found to be consistent with the Collier County ` � Objective 5).Temporary relocation of residents in Growth Management Plan and applicable land ii'ssfss<, lower quality units may be required to make building development regulations.The Community ` ., improvements. Redevelopment Agency,working collaboratively with An additional consideration for lower income County agencies, may propose amendments to the 'sfsfctshouseholds with improvements to the CRA area is the Growth Management Plan and the Land Use Development Code, including design criteria, building ,1111111 availability of community facilities and services.These heights, land coverage, setback requirements,special r– uses may also risk displacement if property values �` increase ra idl or dramaticall This Redevelo ment exceptions,traffic circulation,traffic access, and other p y y p development and design controls necessary for proper Area Plan includes provisions to support community development of public and private projects. oriented uses that include these facilities and services sfs ;, so that they can remain a part of the community(see To leverage the increment revenues, Collier County Section 5.3.4, Objective 3,Strategy 2). may consider non-ad valorem assessments. For With more urban style development and multi modal example, during the Redevelopment Area Plan update process,the County was working on a stormwater .iiiimprovements,traffic circulation may change. There utility fee that, if adopted, would apply to the CRA area. may be increased congestion on roadways and at major The imposition of special assessments for capital 4,f state road intersections in making them safer for non improvements and essential services is covered by well automobile modes and pursuing catalyst development 'stIf settled case law and specific statutory provisions x � : � opportunities.Any development would need to go `�� " authorizing collection of non-ad valorem assessments *. through the existing Collier County process to assess on the same bill as ad valorem taxes.Such provisions and mitigate for Level of Service changes on roadways. i require extraordinary notice to all affected property £`,, E Ensuring low-cost transportation alternatives may also support affordable mobility for lower income owners. sem; households and community members. Issues concerning restrictions on any property acquired Stsis Regarding impacts on other facilities, such as schools, for community redevelopment purposes and then f returned to use by the private sector will be addressed s any new development would need to go through the N 5-5-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS9 A on a case-by-case basis to ensure all activities necessary to perpetuate the redevelopment initiative :. are advanced in a manner consistent with this Redevelopment Area Plan and any amendment to it. Such restrictions or controls would be expected in the form of covenants on any land sold or leased for private use as provided for in the Community Redevelopment Act, Section 163.380, F.S. To assure that redevelopment will take place in conformance with the projects,objectives and strategies expressed in this Redevelopment Area Plan, the Redevelopment Agency will utilize the regulatory mechanisms used by the County to permit development and redevelopment within its jurisdiction.These mechanisms include but are not limited to the Growth Management Plan;the Land Development Code;adopted design guidelines; performance standards;and County-authorized development review, permitting, and approval processes and any other adopted codes, standards, and policies. xYi $8 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-5-6 9A 5.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS k. w y:, This page is intentionally left blank. gi gyp' 5-5-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 I.:. TAx iNcREmENT 1 MSTU ESTIMATES It A') \ „... -,..,--- - ---:. ',,, tS;At i.t4A A ;:. //, , .., pit,t,„ , titits........,....,s.s\-:,t. .,:H. .., , 0 1,.. '-'7ti''-.---A.,--". ill" iiill I ,,.,,,,,..,....•,,.,,,,,,,,,_ .i • . .„,„„„„„,,„„„...,,,,,, ...,...__ .. ,. ........... , ... : , ... ,.. ..,..,... ,....,,,,, ..:„..,,,,,....,,,,,,,,..:::.• ...,0,,„ , ...„. ....,,.:, , l ' ''" ' ,� kyr ` � 4-,,,,,,----,�� }r ,r f --:'''. . ';',":;*--', -..;;4) -'-' ''''''' -- '-;;,,..-''''-"-- \ '.: Ir*: ' -'-' -' .'-' ''''''-- r.. i - ,- : ' ' ' i '"'. - *N. ' r 7 f' t Eif �� it + . .. - pi. , t : 'øiiii,ii - !:;..:(!,.. i : ' Ili Ili 1 Am no , 1; 1 1 I.!i 1 ill I .. I I it 1111111111 1 11 5 • 6 ,r s .,' f ,/ , i i �' is $ fi „ - . :0, ..., . . , , x tifit4 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 A 5 61 Tax Increment Financing Taxable Value"for each county in Florida. The values li'lliprojected by EDR were used for each CRA tax increment The Redevelopment Area is dependent upon the use of scenario with the low,medium, high growth scenarios itt1 increment revenue financing for funding. Using this starting in 2025. For projection purposes past 2025,three : method,the County froze all taxable values within the different scenarios were developed that reflect different Redevelopment Area at the 2000 rate to establish a base future growth rates for taxable values in the i,' collection amount. Millages are applied through the General Redevelopment Area. Additional details for each scenario Fund(001)and the Unincorporated Area General Fund are presented below and in Tables 5-6-1 through 5-6-3. (111).The future taxes collected(associated with tax base kl r e> r and property value increases)are placed into a separate Scenario#1 account and designated for specific uses.The funds can be Ad valorem revenues associated with the increment dedicated to transportation or general improvements,or revenue financing for the Redevelopment Area were 14i; dedicated placed in the general fund with the base ad valorem estimated using the projected growth of the taxable values revenues. �,, # for residential and non-residential developments. The The analysis is based on the historical tax roll data obtained average taxable values were indexed annually based on the from the Florida Department of Revenue(FDOR)and positive correlation between population growth and taxable population projections for Collier County obtained from the value increases discussed previously,along with the ' `- Bureau of Economic and Business Research(BEBR). Specific historical growth trends of taxable values in the p Redevelopment Area, byland use. Based on these per increases in the tax base are shown in terms of expected p t development and its value.This expected development is projections, if the current millage is held constant(3.5645 based exclusively on past patterns of activity adjusted for mils for fund 001 and 0.8069 mils for fund 111),the ad c o anticipated community redevelopment activities within the valorem taxes used for the Redevelopment Area fund are E .p Redevelopment Area.These programmatic assumptions estimated to generate approximately$92.9 million between t = 2018 and 2040. offer a baseline for comparison with future potential x q4?.' , development. ' Additional growth scenarios are presented in this report For this analysis,the Bayshore CRA's current millage rates that reflects more aggressive growth rates in taxable values rI.fplanning and revenues.Although more aggressive than the 'IVA, have been used,and were held constant over thepotentialg gg horizon. growth rates in Scenario#1,these scenarios still present k4 revenue projections that can reasonably be obtained.Since rr'l As for the structure of the revenues which may accrue,only 1976,the taxable value for residential property in Collier s �r e; the taxable value(s)net of the base year taxable value is County has averaged a 10 percent annual increase,and considered in calculating current or future increment commercial property has averaged a 9 percent annual Z revenues. increase.Within the CRA,taxable values(all property)have The general procedures used to calculate available averaged a 5 percent annual increase. a revenues are shown in the following calculations: AgtScenario#2 ` • Assessed values,including new construction— Scenario#2 reflects increased growth rates that are :7-'1:0't Exemptions or exclusions=Current taxable values. consistent with the historical growth rates in taxable values Nrif t • Current taxable values—Established base year taxable for the entire CRA area.This scenario estimates slightly values=Net valuations subject to applicable higher taxable value growth than Scenario#1,with a jurisdictional millages. projected average annual taxable value growth rate of 5.2 percent(as opposed to Scenario#1 at 4.8 percent).As CRA • Net valuations x by applicable millages=increment properties are redeveloped,it is reasonable to assume that revenues. Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment taxable values will increase at or above historical growth Act,Section 163.387,F.S.,the maximum revenue rates. Using these higher annual growth rates,the Scenario available to the Redevelopment Trust Fund will be 95 �t #2 increment revenue financing option would generate , percent of the calculated increment revenues. approximately$96.6 million between 2018 and 2040. 4.,,r: .e Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic& Demographic suss; Research(EDR)Revenue Estimating Conference. The conference produces detailed projections of the"County 5-6-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6 9 A Scenario#35.6.2 Municipal Service Taxing Additionally,an optimistic growth rate scenario was developed.Scenario#3 has increased growth rates that are Units (MSTUs) more than Scenarios#1 and#2, bringing the average growth rate for all land uses more in line with the There are two MSTUs that overlap with the CRA area– recent growth rates of the entire county seen over the the Bayshore Beautification MSTU and the Haldeman last few years.This scenario projects the growth in Creek MSTU.The Bayshore Beautification MSTU was taxable values for all property to average created to provide certain streetscape and right-of-way improvements in the CRA area generally south of US approximately 5.7 percent,annually. Using these rates, 41.The Haldeman Creek MSTU was created for the increment revenue financing option generated approximately$103.9 million between 2018 and 2040. maintenance dredging and navigational marker maintenance. Projected revenues for these two MSTUs For each of the following scenarios,the following are based on the same scenarios described for the TIF apply: calculations above(see Tables 5-6-4 through 5-6-6 for • Projected total taxable value of all properties Bayshore Beautification MSTU and 5-6-7 through 5-6-9 within Redevelopment Area. Projected growth for Haldeman Creek MSTU). Note that revenues stem rates by land use are consistent with historical directly from millages(as opposed to an increment growth rates observed between 2000 and 2017 difference with a base year as in the case of the TIF within Redevelopment Area.All figures rounded to revenues). nearest thousand. • Difference between total taxable value (Item 1)for each year and base year(2000). • For projection purposes, millage rates are assumed to remain the same through 2040. • Increment revenue by year(Item 2), divided by 1,000, multiplied by total millage rate, and reduced by 5 percent for budgeting purposes. 1 Nib Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-6-2 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 A Taxable Mirage Revenuers} Year Tax Increment(L) Value") Fund 001 Fund 111 Fund 001 Fund 111 Total 2017 $663,687,689 $375,606,583 3.5645 0.8069 - - - 2018 $701,076,000 $412,994,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,271,907 $287,923 $1,559,830 2019 $761,806,000 $473,724,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,398,514 $316,583 $1,715,097 2020 $810,239,000 $522,157,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,604,163 $363,136 $1,967,299 2021 5861,111,000 $573,029,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,768,170 $400,263 $2,168,433 2022 $914,322,000 $626,240,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,940,437 $439,259 $2,379,696 2023 $970,752,000 $682,670,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,120,624 $480,048 $2,600,672 2024 $1,062,117,000 $774,035,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,311,711 $523,305 $2,835,016 2025 $1,109,715,000 $821,633,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,621,098 $593,341 $3,214,439 2026 $1,158,389,000 $870,307,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,782,278 $629,828 $3,412,106 2027 $1,208,139,000 $920,057,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,947,102 $667,139 $3,614,241 2028 $1,258,967,000 $970,885,894 3,5645 0.8069 $3,115,569 $705,275 S3,820,844 2029 $1,310,871,000 $1,022,789,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,287,687 $744,237 $4,031,924 2030 $1,363,851,000 $1,075,769,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,463,448 $784,025 $4,247,473 2031 $1,417,909,000 $1,129,827,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,642,853 $824,637 $4,467,490 2032 $1,473,043,000 $1,184,961,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,825,908 $866,075 $4,691,983 2033 $1,529,253,000 $1,241,171,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,012,607 $908,338 $4,920,945 2034 $1,586,541,000 $1,298,459,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,202,949 $951,427 $5,154,376 2035 $1,644,905,000 $1,356,823,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,396,942 $995,341 $5,392,283 2036 $1,704,346,000 $1,416,264,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,594,579 $1,040,080 $5,634,659 2037 $1,764,863,000 $1,476,781,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,795,862 $1,085,645 $5,881,507, 2038 $1,826,457,000 $1,538,375,894 3.5645 0.8069 $5,000,790 $1,132,035 $6,132,825, 2039 $1,889,128,000 $1,601,046,894 3.5645 0.8069 $5,209,364 $1,179,250 $6,388,614 2040 $1,952,876,000 $1,664,794,894 3.5645 0.8069 $5,421,585 $1,227,291 $6,648,876 2041 $2,017,700,000 $1,729,618,894 3.5645 0.8069 $5,637,453 $1,276,157 $6,913,610, 2042 $2,083,601,000 $1,795,519,894 3.5645 0.8069 $5,856,965 $1,325,848 $7,182,813 2043 $2,150,579,000 $1,862,497,894 3.5645 0.8069 $6,080,124 $1,376,365 $7,456,489 2044 $2,218,633,000 $1,930,551,894 3.5645 0.8069 $6,306,930 $1,427,707 $7,734,637 2045 $2,287,764,000 $1,999,682,894 3.5645 0.8069 $6,537,380 $1,479,874 $8,017,254 2046 $2,357,971,000 $2,069,889,894 3.5645 0.8069 $6,771,476 $1,532,867 $8,304,343 2047 $2,429,256,000 $2,141,174,894 3.5645 0.8069 $7,009,216 $1,586,684 $8,595,900 2048 $2,501,617,000 $2,213,535,894 3.5645 0.8069 $7,250,607 $1,641,328 58,891,935 2049 $2,575,054,000 $2,286,972,894 3.5645 0.8069 $7,495,641 $1,696,797 $9,192,438 Total $134,681,939 $30,488,108 $165,170,047 Table 5-6-1:Scenario#1 Projected TIF Revenues Notes: 1. Source:Scenario#1 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 4.8%.Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic&Demographic Research(EDR)Revenue Estimating Conference. 2. http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/conferences/advalorem/index.cfm 3. Taxable value for each year(Item 1)less the base year taxable value of$288,081,106 4. For each fund,the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the millage,divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections(i.e.,the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from 2017 to 2018 5-6-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-Draft March 2019 9A TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES x,5.6 ITaxable Miltage Revenue(3) Year Tax Increment") Value") Fund 001 Fund 111 Fund 001 Fund 111 Total 2017 $663,687,689 $375,606,583 3.5645 0.8069 - - - 2018 $701,076,000 $412,994,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,271,907 $287,923 $1,559,830 Via. 2019 $761,806,000 $473,724,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,398,514 $316,583 $1,715,097 2020 $810,239,000 $522,157,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,604,163 $363,136 $1,967,299 2021 $861,111,000 $573,029,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,768,170 $400,263 $2,168,433 2022 $914,322,000 $626,240,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,940,437 $439,259 $2,379,696 2023 $970,752,000 $682,670,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,120,624 $480,048 $2,600,672 2024 $1,028,659,000 $740,577,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,311,711 $523,305 $2,835,016 2025 $1,086,938,000 $798,856,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,507,800 $567,694 $3,075,494 2026 $1,146,540,000 $858,458,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,705,149 $612,368 $3,317,517 2027 $1,207,463,000 $919,381,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,906,978 $658,056 $3,565,034 2028 $1,269,707,000 $981,625,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,113,280 $704,757 $3,818,037 2029 $1,333,274,000 $1,045,192,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,324,055 $752,470 $4,076,525 2030 $1,398,162,000 $1,110,080,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,539,311 $801,198 $4,340,509 2031 $1,464,372,000 $1,176,290,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,759,039, $850,938 $4,609,977 2032 $1,531,904,000 $1,243,822,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,983,244 $901,692 $4,884,936 2033 $1,600,757,000 $1,312,675,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,211,926 $953,459 $5,165,385 2034 $1,670,932,000 $1,382,850,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,445,082 $1,006,238 $5,451,320 2035 $1,742,429,000 $1,454,347,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,682,713 $1,060,031 $5,742,744 2036 $1,815,247,000 $1,527,165,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,924,822 $1,114,838, $6,039,660 2037 $1,889,387,000 $1,601,305,894 3.5645 0.8069 $5,171,404 $1,170,657 $6,342,061 2038 $1,964,849,000 $1,676,767,894, 3.5645 0.8069 $5,422,462 $1,227,489 $6,649,951 2039 $2,041,632,000 $1,753,550,894 3.5645 0.8069 $5,677,997 $1,285,335 $6,963,332 2040 $2,119,738,000 $1,831,656,894 3.5645 0.8069 $5,938,006 $1,344,193 $7,282,199 2041 $2,199,165,000 $1,911,083,894 3.5645 0.8069 $6,202,494 $1,404,066 $7,606,560 2042 $2,279,913,000 $1,991,831,894 3.5645 0.8069 $6,471,456 $1,464,951 $7,936,407 2043 $2,361,983,000 $2,073,901,894 3.5645 0.8069 $6,744,891 $1,526,849 $8,271,740 2044 $2,445,375,000 $2,157,293,894 3.5645 0.8069 $7,022,802 $1,589,760 $8,612,562 2045 $2,530,089,000 $2,242,007,894 3.5645 0.8069 $7,305,190 $1,653,684 $8,958,874 2046 $2,616,125,000 $2,328,043,894 3.5645 0.8069 $7,592,055 $1,718,622 $9,310,677 2047 $2,703,482,000 $2,415,400,894 3.5645 0.8069 $7,883,397 $1,784,574 $9,667,971 2048 $2,792,161,000 $2,504,079,894 3.5645 0.8069 $8,179,212 $1,851,538 $10,030,750 2049 $2,882,161,000 $2,594,079,894 3.5645 0.8069 $8,479,503 $1,919,515 $10,399,018 Total $144,609,794 532,735,489 5177,345,283 Table 5-6-2:Scenario#2 Projected TIE Revenues Notes: I. Source:Scenario#1 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 5.2%.Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic&Demographic Research(EDR)Revenue Estimating Conference. 2. Taxable value for each year(Item 1)less the base year taxable value of$288,081,106 3. For each fund,the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the millage,divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections(i.e.,the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from 2017 to 2018 N. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-Draft March 2019 5-6-4 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES A A Taxable MiRage Revenue" Year Tax increment(2) Valuel'1 Fund 001 Fund 111 Fund 001 Fund 111 Total • 2017 $663,687,689 $375,606,583 3.5645 0.8069 - - 2018 $701,076,000 $412,994,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,271,907 $287,923 $1,559,830 2019 $761,806,000 $473,724,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,398,514 $316,583 $1,715,097 2020 $810,239,000 $522,157,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,604,163 $363,136 $1,967,299 2021 $861,111,000 $573,029,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,768,170 $400,263 $2,168,433 2022 $914,322,000 $626,240,894 3.5645 0.8069 $1,940,437 $439,259 $2,379,696 2023 $970,752,000 $682,670,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,120,624 $480,048 $2,600,672 2024 $1,054,119,000 $766,037,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,311,711 $523,305 $2,835,016 2025 $1,119,750,000 $831,668,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,594,015 $587,210 $3,181,225 2026 $1,187,573,000 $899,491,894 3.5645 0.8069 $2,816,260 $637,520 $3,453,780 2027 $1,257,587,000 $969,505,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,045,927 $689,510 $3,735,437 2028 $1,329,792,000 $1,041,710,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,283,014 $743,180 $4,026,194 2029 $1,404,190,000 $1,116,108,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,527,520 $798,529 $4,326,049 2030 $1,480,778,000 $1,192,696,894 3.5645 0.8069 $3,779,452 $855,559 $4,635,011 2031 $1,559,559,000 $1,271,477,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,038,800 $914,268 $4,953,068 2032 $1,640,531,000 $1,352,449,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,305,574 $974,658 $5,280,232 2033 $1,723,694,000 $1,435,612,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,579,767 $1,036,727 $5,616,494 2034 $1,809,049,000 $1,520,967,894 3.5645 0.8069 $4,861,380 $1,100,476 $5,961,856 2035 $1,896,596,000 $1,608,514,894 3.5645 0.8069 $5,150,416 $1,165,906 $6,316,322 2036 $1,986,334,000 $1,698,252,894 3.5645 0.8069 $5,446,874 $1,233,015 $6,679,889 2037 $2,078,264,000 $1,790,182,894 3.5645 0.8069 $5,750,751 $1,301,804 $7,052,555 2038 $2,172,385,000 $1,884,303,894 3.5645 0.8069 $6,062,052 $1,372,274 $7,434,326 2039 $2,268,698,000 $1,980,616,894 3.5645 0.8069 $6,380,771 $1,444,423 $7,825,194 2040 $2,367,202,000 $2,079,120,894 3.5645 0.8069 $6,706,913 $1,518,252 $8,225,165 2041 $2,467,898,000 $2,179,816,894 3.5645 0.8069 $7,040,475 $1,593,761 $8,634,236 2042 $2,570,786,000 $2,282,704,894 3.5645 0.8069 $7,381,459 $1,670,950 $9,052,409 2043 $2,675,865,000 $2,387,783,894 3.5645 0.8069 $7,729,867 $1,749,819 $9,479,686 2044 $2,783,135,000 $2,495,053,894 3.5645 0.8069 $8,085,693 $1,830,368 $9,916,061 2045 $2,892,598,000 $2,604,516,894 3.5645 0.8069 $8,448,939 $1,912,596 $10,361,535 2046 $3,004,251,000 $2,716,169,894 3.5645 0.8069 $8,819,610 $1,996,505 $10,816,115 2047 $3,118,097,000 $2,830,015,894 3.5645 0.8069 $9,197,698 $2,082,094 $11,279,792 2048 $3,234,133,000 $2,946,051,894 3.5645 0.8069 $9,583,212 $2,169,363 $11,752,575 2049 $3,352,362,000 $3,064,280,894 3.5645 0.8069 $9,976,142 $2,258,311 $112234453 Total $161,008,107 $36,447,595 $197,455,702 Table 5-6-3:Scenario#3 Projected TIF Revenues Notes: 1. Source:Scenario#1 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 5.70%.Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic&Demographic Research(EOR)Revenue Estimating Conference. 2. Taxable value for each year(Item 1)less the base year taxable value of$288,081,106 3. For each fund,the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the millage,divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections(i.e.,the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from 2017 to 2018 5-6-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-Draft March 2019 9A TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6 Tax Year (FY) MSTU Valuation BudgetingProjectedProjected r Adjustment Revenue 2017 $520,652,265 95% 2018 $556,395,962 95% 2.3604 $1,247,651 2019 $591,115,003 95% 2.3604 $1,325,504 2020 $625,527,320 95% 2.3604 $1,402,670 2021 $660,034,619 95% 2.3604 $1,480,048 2022 $694,831,419 95% 2.3604 $1,558,076 2023 $730,024,175 95% 2.3604 $1,636,992 2024 $765,674,832 95% 2.3604 $1,716,934 2025 $801,819,577 95% 2.3604 $1,797,984 2026 $838,478,945 95% 2.3604 $1,880,188 2027 $875,663,295 95% 2.3604 $1,963,570 2028 $913,375,780 95% 2.3604 $2,048,136 2029 $951,615,129 95% 2.3604 $2,133,883 2030 $990,376,372 95% 2.3604 $2,220,800 2031 $1,029,652,374 95% 2.3604 $2,308,872 2032 $1,069,434,646 95% 2.3604 $2,398,079 2033 $1,109,713,336 95% 2.3604 $2,488,399 2034 $1,150,478,225 95% 2.3604 $2,579,809 2035 $1,191,719,137 95% 2.3604 $2,672,287 2036 $1,233,425,692 95% 2.3604 $2,765,809 2037 $1,275,588,082 95% 2.3604 $2,860,353 2038 $1,318,196,940 95% 2.3604 $2,955,898 2039 $1,361,243,853 95% 2.3604 $3,052,426 2040 $1,404,721,160 95% 2.3604 $3,149,919 2041 $1,448,622,279 95% 2.3604 $3,248,362 2042 $1,492,941,782 95% 2.3604 $3,347,743 2043 $1,537,675,538 95% 2.3604 $3,448,053 2044 $1,582,820,738 95% 2.3604 $3,549,286 2045 $1,628,375,926 95% 2.3604 $3,651,438 2046 $1,674,341,360 95% 2.3604 $3,754,510 2047 $1,720,718,577 95% 2.3604 $3,858,505 2048 $1,767,510,764 95% 2.3604 $3,963,431 2049 $1,814,722,965 95% 2.3604 $4,069,298 Total - FY 2018-49: $82,534,913 Table 5-6-4:Bayshore Beautification MSTU Scenario#1 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-Draft March 2019 5-6-6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 A Tax Year (FY) MSTU Valuation Budgeting Millage Projected Adjustment Revenue 2017 $520,652,265 95% 2018 $564,585,635 95% 2.3604 $1,266,016 2019 $606,549,761 95% 2.3604 $1,360,115 2020 $647,828,592 95% 2.3604 $1,452,678 2021 $688,973,702 95% 2.3604 $1,544,941 2022 $730,242,846 95% 2.3604 $1,637,482 2023 $771,769,450 95% 2.3604 $1,730,600 2024 $813,623,294 95% 2.3604 $1,824,453 2025 $855,837,738 95% 2.3604 $1,919,113 2026 $898,423,883 95% 2.3604 $2,014,608 2027 $941,377,891 95% 2.3604 $2,110,927 2028 $984,686,255 95% 2.3604 $2,208,041 2029 $1,028,328,725 95% 2,3604 $2,305,904 2030 $1,072,280,092 95% 2.3604 $2,404,459 2031 $1,116,512,185 95% 2.3604 $2,503,645 2032 $1,160,994,826 95% 2.3604 $2,603,392 2033 $1,205,696,625 95% 2.3604 $2,703,630 2034 $1,250,585,657 95% 2.3604 $2,804,288 2035 $1,295,630,050 95% 2.3604 $2,905,295 2036 $1,340,798,359 95% 2.3604 $3,006,579 2037 $1,386,060,036 95% 2.3604 $3,108,073 2038 $1,431,385,662 95% 2.3604 $3,209,711 2039 $1,476,747,194 95% 2.3604 $3,311,428 2040 $1,522,118,310 95% 2.3604 $3,413,168 2041 $1,567,474,241 95% 2.3604 $3,514,873 2042 $1,612,792,344 95% 2.3604 $3,616,493 2043 $1,658,052,037 95% 2.3604 $3,717,983 2044 $1,703,234,847 95% 2.3604 $3,819,300 2045 $1,748,324,458 95% 2.3604 $3,920,408 2046 $1,793,306,734 95% 2.3604 $4,021,275 2047 $1,838,170,219 95% 2.3604 $4,121,876 2048 $1,882,905,417 95% 2.3604 $4,222,189 2049 $1,927,505,168 95% 2.3604 $4,322,199 Total - FY 2018-49: $88,625,142 Table 5-6-5:Bayshore Beautification MSTU Scenario#2 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget 5-6-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-Draft March 2019 9A TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6 Budgeting Projected Tax Year (FY) MSTU Valuation Millage Adjustment Revenue 2017 $520,652,265 95% 2018 $570,657,837 95% 2.3604 $1,279,632 2019 $618,846,476 95% 2.3604 $1,387,689 2020 $666,424,041 95% 2.3604 $1,494,376 2021 $714,013,673 95% 2.3604 $1,601,090 2022 $761,898,751 95% 2.3604 $1,708,467 2023 $810,218,308 95% 2.3604 $1,816,817 2024 $859,037,223 95% 2.3604 $1,926,288 2025 $908,377,891 95% 2.3604 $2,036,928 2026 $958,236,209 95% 2.3604 $2,148,730 2027 $1,008,590,342 95% 2.3604 $2,261,643 2028 $1,059,406,499 95% 2.3604 $2,375,592 2029 $1,110,642,628 95% 2.3604 $2,490,483 2030 $1,162,251,104 95% 2.3604 $2,606,209 2031 $1,214,180,327 95% 2.3604 $2,722,654 2032 $1,266,376,232 95% 2.3604 $2,839,697 2033 $1,318,783,498 95% 2.3604 $2,957,214 2034 $1,371,346,270 95% 2.3604 $3,075,079 2035 $1,424,008,878 95% 2.3604 $3,193,169 2036 $1,476,716,929 95% 2.3604 $3,311,361 2037 $1,529,416,999 95% 2.3604 $3,429,534 2038 $1,582,057,896 95% 2.3604 $3,547,575 2039 $1,634,590,626 95% 2.3604 $3,665,373 2040 $1,686,968,643 95% 2.3604 $3,782,825 2041 $1,739,148,306 95% 2.3604 $3,899,831 2042 $1,791,089,012 95% 2.3604 $4,016,302 2043 $1,842,753,405 95% 2.3604 $4,132,153 2044 $1,894,107,627 95% 2.3604 $4,247,309 2045 $1,945,121,181 95% 2.3604 $4,361,701 2046 $1,995,767,160 95% 2.3604 $4,475,268 2047 $2,046,022,279 95% 2.3604 $4,587,959 2048 $2,095,866,709 95% 2.3604 $4,699,730 2049 $2,145,284,528 95% 2.3604 $4,810,543 Total - FY 2018-49: $96,889,221 Table 5-6-6:Bayshore Beautification MSTU Scenario#3 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-Draft March 2019 5-6-8 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 n Budgeting Projected Tax Year (FY) MSTU Valuation Millage Adjustment Revenue 2017 $106,705,344 95% 2018 $114,144,177 95% 0.7348 $79,679 2019 $121,367,536 95% 1.0000 $115,299 2020 $128,526,521 95% 1.0000 $122,100 2021 $135,704,827 95% 1.0000 $128,920 2022 $142,942,896 95% 1.0000 $135,796 2023 $150,262,704 95% 1.0000 $142,750 2024 $157,677,032 95% 1.0000 $149,793 2025 $165,193,225 95% 1.0000 $156,934 2026 $172,815,346 95% 1.0000 $164,175 2027 $180,545,373 95% 1.0000 $171,518 2028 $188,383,756 95% 1.0000 $178,965 2029 $196,329,988 95% 1.0000 $186,513 2030 $204,382,850 95% 1.0000 $194,164 2031 $212,540,650 95% 1.0000 $201,914 2032 $220,801,394 95% 1.0000 $209,761 2033 $229,162,805 95% 1.0000 $217,705 2034 $237,622,632 95% 1.0000 $225,742 2035 $246,178,462 95% 1.0000 $233,870 2036 $254,827,995 95% 1.0000 $242,087 2037 $263,568,960 95% 1.0000 $250,391 2038 $272,399,253 95% 1.0000 $258,779 2039 $281,316,833 95% 1.0000 $267,251 2040 $290,320,002 95% 1.0000 $275,804 2041 $299,407,206 95% 1.0000 $284,437 2042 $308,577,110 95% 1.0000 $293,148 2043 $317,828,658 95% 1.0000 $301,937 2044 $327,161,143 95% 1.0000 $310,803 2045 $336,574,094 95% 1.0000 $319,745 2046 $346,067,305 95% 1.0000 $328,764 2047 $355,641,019 95% 1.0000 $337,859 2048 $365,295,793 95% 1.0000 $347,031 2049 $375,032,438 95% 1.0000 $356,281 Total - FY 2018-49: $7,189,915 Table 5-6-7:Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario#1 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget 5-6-9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-Draft March 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATED ,5.6 Budgeting Projected Tax Year (FY) MSTU Valuation Millage Adjustment 2017 $106,705,344 95% .4: 2018 $115,835,723 95% 0./348 $80,860 2019 $124,558,218 95% 1.0000 $118,330 2020 $133,140,017 95% 1.0000 $126,483 2021 $141,695,436 95% 1.0000 $134,611 2022 $150,277,871 95% 1.0000 $142,764 2023 $158,914,679 95% 1.0000 $150,969 2024 $167,620,097 95% 1.0000 $159,239 2025 $176,400,756 95% 1.0000 $167,581 2026 $185,258,652 95% 1.0000 $175,996 2027 $194,192,721 95% 1.0000 $184,483 2028 $203,199,877 95% 1.0000 $193,040 2029 $212,275,571 95% 1.0000 $201,662 2030 $221,414,344 95% 1.0000 $210,344 2031 $230,610,047 95% 1.0000 $219,080 2032 $239,856,126 95% 1.0000 $227,863 2033 $249,145,751 95% 1.0000 $236,688 2034 $258,472,054 95% 1.0000 $245,548 2035 $267,828,164 95% 1.0000 $254,437 2036 $277,207,234 95% 1.0000 $263,347 2037 $286,602,686 95% 1.0000 $272,273 2038 $296,008,161 95% 1.0000 $281,208 2039 $305,417,647 95% 1.0000 $290,147 2040 $314,825,418 95% 1.0000 $299,084 2041 $324,226,118 95% 1.0000 $308,015 2042 $333,614,832 95% 1.0000 $316,934 2043 $342,987,111 95% 1.0000 $325,838 2044 $352,338,908 95% 1.0000 $334,722 2045 $361,666,688 95% 1.0000 $343,583 2046 $370,967,365 95% 1.0000 $352,419 2047 $380,238,358 95% 1.0000 $361,226 2048 $389,477,595 95% 1.0000 $370,004 2049 $398,683,455 95% 1.0000 $378,749 Total - FY 2018-49: $7,727,527 Table 5-6-8:Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario#2 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-Draft March 2019 5-6-10 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 A Tax Year (FY) MSTU Valuation Budgeting Millage Projected Adjustment Revenue 2017 $106,705,344 95% 2018 $117,093,425 95% 0.7348 $81,738 2019 $127,106,206 95% 1.0000 $120,751 2020 $136,994,758 95% 1.0000 $130,145 2021 $146,888,010 95% 1.0000 $139,544 2022 $156,844,298 95% 1.0000 $149,002 2023 $166,892,038 95% 1.0000 $158,547 2024 $177,044,257 95% 1.0000 $168,192 2025 $187,305,175 95% 1.0000 $177,940 2026 $197,673,490 95% 1.0000 $187,790 2027 $208,144,221 95% 1.0000 $197,737 2028 $218,709,954 95% 1.0000 $207,774 2029 $229,361,500 95% 1.0000 $217,893 2030 $240,088,574 95% 1.0000 $228,084 2031 $250,880,014 95% 1.0000 $238,336 2032 $261,724,194 95% 1.0000 $248,638 2033 $272,609,257 95% 1.0000 $258,979 2034 $283,523,220 95% 1.0000 $269,347 2035 $294,454,148 95% 1.0000 $279,731 2036 $305,390,372 95% 1.0000 $290,121 2037 $316,320,528 95% 1.0000 $300,505 2038 $327,233,622 95% 1.0000 $310,872 2039 $338,119,195 95% 1.0000 $321,213 2040 $348,967,293 95% 1.0000 $331,519, 2041 $359,768,601 95%� 1.0000 $341,780 2042 $370,514,490 95% 1.0000 $351,989 2043 $381,196,966 95% 1.0000 $362,137 2044 $391,808,847 95% 1.0000 $372,218 2045 $402,343,563 95% 1.0000 $382,226 2046 $412,795,427 95% 1.0000 $392,156 2047 $423,159,430 95% 1.0000 $402,001 2048 $433,431,416 95% 1.0000 $411,760 2049 $443,607,996 95% 1.0000 $421,428 Total - FY 2018-49: $8,452,093 Table 5-6-9:Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario#3 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget 5-6-11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-Draft March 2019 9 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6 C 5.6.3 Underlying Assumptions The following charts show underlying population and tax value trends that inform and contextualize the revenue projections calculations presented in this section. Figure 5-6-1 shows that the rate of population growth for Collier County has decreased sizably since 2002/2003,with a more gradual decrease projected out from 2017/2018 for the next few decades. In terms of historic tax value growth rates since 2000, Figure 5-6-2 shows that there was an increase during the lead up to the recession,followed by a drop during the recession itself. In recent years,the rate has gradually risen. Given the sizable changes during the lead-up to the recession and the recession itself,the model used to generate TIF projections was matched to longer historical trends in County taxable values,from the 1970s through 2003/2004. historical taxable value for Collier County. Figure 5-6-3 shows the historical trend used for guidance in blue;this trend is continued for comparison to projection calculations(shown by the grey line through 2044).The orange line indicates historic data that was excluded from the historic trend basis since it 1141-441 was considered an anomaly. Annual Population Growth Rate(2000-2045) 4.5096 — Collier County 4.0096 . _ .n.,: State of Florida 3.50% VAira 3.00% 2.50% Yv 2.00% .. ~+ 34 F1 FY 4 1.00% 0.50% - 0.00% OO Qt O OO Os O ey N M Q •n �D h ,y N N N N M Nf M M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^d 0 No `cd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ,;"1 N N N N N N N N N I Figure S-6-1:Population Growth Rate Trends and Projections(2000-2045) Source:BEBR,Volume 51,Bulletin 180,January 2018 ' te Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 5-6-12 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 A lE yf 50.0% .�` 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% :AAde,ego doo 0.0% - 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 - •8 2009 2010 2+ 10'1.2 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 -10.0% iv* { 4011i 4110 a„ -20.0% ‘'At -30.0% ��Couniy TaxVal% —w CRA TaxVai% Figure 5-6-2:Trends in Tax Value Growth Rates(2000-2017) Source:Florida Property Valuations and Tax Databook&EDR Ad Valorem Revenue Estimating Conference j:. 5350,000000,000 y 67,809,839.760-717,793,067.39x.6,145,364,420,48 =0.95 5250,000,000000 $200,000,000,000 $iso,00000o0aa £' $ioo,000,o02o00 550,000,030.000 19/61978198019821984I,41,1988 I r)019921994199b1998200010)iI0012006.41,8)0101G1)101,1)0161018)01010)1101A/0)62018)03U)0J22014201610382040)072)4144 Figure 5-6-3:Historic and Projected TIF Revenue Trend Comparison Source:Florida Property Valuations and Tax Databook&EDR Ad Valorem Revenue Estimating Conference 1 5-643 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 �. TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATE A Conclusion With the recovery from the recession of 2008,the CRA area isoised for revitalization via investment, P development, and redevelopment. With this update, the CRA will be able to continue the general mission of '`,.\ redevelopment that it set out when the Bayshore Gateway Triangle redevelopment area was first created in 2000. The CRA can move forward with the more detailed planning and evaluation for the suggested implementation items of this Redevelopment Area Plan with the guidance of the overall vision, allowing for change and also protecting and enhancing what defines the area and makes it unique. der;, •n, ri r 45 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—Draft March 2019 e 5-6-14 9A 3 2Ps Creativity in Bloom al Tindale io ' > OIiver design 9A . • Section 6 • Relocation Procedures • Relocation of residents and businesses displaced, as a result of property acquisition by the CRA will follow procedures, which fulfill the intent of the law and objectives stated below.' Collier County uses the Florida Department of Transportation relocation policy as a guideline which is based.on.the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Assistance Act of 1970 of the U.S. Federal Government. • In those cases in which.acquisition and relocation are to be utilized,-the following'general policy and guidelines shall apply unless the CRA chooses to adopt a separate relocation policy from time to time for • a specific project. Displacement Policy and Guidelines: • "Displacement" means the involuntary movement: except temporary relocation, of a household from a dwelling'unit resulting from its acquisition, rehabilitation, or demolition, ora code enforcement activity. Relocation benefits will be received, on a'uniform basis, by displaced families or persons following the guidelines of this policy. Activities which result in displacement action or in which,displacement may occur shall take into account options and effects to minimize displacement whenever possible. Policy Applicability This policy and guidelines shall be used for redevelopment activities as a Local Displacement Policy, only when comprehensive treatment (an area which is effected by social, economical, and capital 'improvements as well as rehabilitation) in a target area is used. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS •Designated Target Areas: Relocation benefits are available to eligible households residing in dwelling ,units located in redevelopment target areas only when comprehensive treatment is used. Occupancy Requirements Owner/Occupant: A-person will be considered an owner/occupant if he/she actually owned and occupied the dwelling unit for not less than 180 consecutive days immediately prior to the Minimum Housing:Code .Inspection of the dwelling unit.. • -Tenant: A person will be, considered a tenant if he/she lawfully occupied the rental dwelling for not less than 90 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing Code Inspection of the dwelling unit. Purchaser/Occupant: A person will be considered a purchaser-occupant if he/she occupied the dwelling • unit for not less than 180 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing Code Inspection of the dwelling unit under a bona fide, written Agreement for Deed. • Business: The occupants, for not less than 90 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing '• Code inspection, of the dwelling in which the business is located. Written Notice: Determination of Displacement • A person or business will be considered displaced as a result of redevelopment activities only if the ' displacement move occurs as a result of and after receipt of a written-notice of eligibility for displacement • benefits. Adequate time will be provided to the displace to locate suitable.temporary or permanent • housing. . 102 • • 9. A Relation of Displacement Payments to Income and Assets • Displacement payments are not to be considered as income-or for determining eligibility of a person or • business under housing assistance programs. Displacement payments are not to be considered as assets for determining eligibility for H.U.D. or other public housing programs. Condition of the Replacement Dwelling as a Criterion for Payment • When the replacement dwelling selected by the displace does not meet the local minimum housing code, the Community Redevelopment Agency has a responsibility for providing continuing assistance to facilitate the claimant's move to a replacement dwelling that meets the local minimum housing code. BENEFITS AND ASSISTANCE Displacement Policy: Minimizing Impacts • Relocation payments and assistance will be made on a uniform basis to all those eligible without regard to race, color, religion, handicap, sex, age or source of income. Persons or businesses eligible for benefits and assistance are cautioned not to make any move before receiving approval from Collier County. This provision must be strictly adhered to inasmuch as unapproved moves,could result in denial of benefits and assistance. Benefits to be provided will be made as established in this relocation plan • and all payments made under this policy shall be deemed appropriate by Collier County. Project or program activities shall be planned and carried out in a manner that minimizes hardship to site • occupants. • Persons or businesses to be displaced shall be afforded the opportunity of participating in the formulation of relocation plans and shall be provided full information relating to program or project activities which may have an impact on the residents and businesses of the project or program area. Arrangements shall be made to provide relocation assistance in accordance with the needs of those to be displaced, including social services counseling, guidance assistance, and referrals, as well as housing counseling. Relocation shall be carried out in a manner that will promote maximum choice within the community's ' total housing supply; lessen racial, ethnic, and economic concentrations; and facilitate desegregation and racially inclusive patterns of occupancy and use of public and private facilities. Services to Minimize Displacement Impacts: ' Services shall be provided to all persons and businesses being displaced to assure that the relocation process will not result in different or separate treatment on account of race, color, religion, sex, age, or source of income. Eligible persons and businesses shall be fully informed at the earliest possible date as to the availability of relocation payments and assistance, and tile eligibility requirements, as well as the procedures'for obtaining such payments and assistance. . Direct personal interviews will be utilized to determine the extent of the need of each-eligible person and business for relocation assistance. - Displacement Housing Benefits: Redevelopment Condemnation/Demolition, and Rehabilitation A family person or business displaced under this Section is eligible for a displacement benefit for a comparable replacement dwelling as determined by family composition or business. Owner/occupantwho elect to purchase a replacement dwelling are eligible for a maxim m payment of $15,000.00. - • • 103 • • 9A Tenants are eligible for a displacement housing payment of up to $4,000.00 rental assistance, or down . payment assistance. • Owner/occupants who do not elect•to purchase another housing unit are eligible for a replacement housing payment equivalent to four years rental assistance, but not to exceed $4,000.00. Computation of rental assistance payments shall be based on the current Fair Market Rents. Moving Expense and Dislocation Allowance Families and persons permanently vacating their dwelling because of Condemnation/Demolition or Rehabilitation activities are eligible for a one time moving expense allowance of up to $500.00 to help • defray costs involved in displacement. Businesses: The occupant of the dwelling is eligible for a moving payment of up to $10,000.00 to relocate the business to a decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling. Finality of Payment The total approved amount of a relocation payment is not subject to later computation except to correct an error or to implement findings on review in accordance with established procedures. Temporary Displacement Benefits . Temporary Displacement Benefits, when authorized, shall be fully documented and approved by the Administrator of Community Development and Environmental Services. Temporary benefits shall discontinue upon issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Approved costs in connection with a temporary displacement include: 1. Actual reasonable moving cost to and from temporary accommodations which must be located within Collier County. These costs can be one of the following: • a) Actual invoice cost of a certified moving contractor. b) A$300.00 total allowance if a self-move. c)' A $100.00 total allowance if displacement does not involve household furnishings. 2. Actual reasonable cost of renting or sharing a temporary dwelling excluding deposits and installation charges. Temporary housing accommodations can be one of the following depending . upon the composition of the displaced household and available accommodations: a) A dwelling reserved.exclusively for temporary relocation housing. b) Other adequate housing. c) A motel, only when displacement is less than 15 days. • • 3. Actual reasonable costs for storage of furniture that cannot be housed in the temporary unit, • not to exceed the benefit period for temporary housing. 4. Businesses are not eligible for temporary displacement benefits. . • In all cases, the temporary displacement dwelling must be inspected and approved by the Community Redevelopment Agency as decent, safe, and sanitary. DOCUMENTATION,ASSURANCES, AND SERVICES • • • • • • 104 1 - 9A Displacement Plan Implementation • . •• i • The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency is. the assigned administrative implementing agency for displacement and shall use the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Handbook 1371.1, Relocation Assistance and Real Property.Acquisition, for assistance and guidance in implementing this policy. Equal Opportunity .in carrying out displacement actions, the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency shall take ' of trnative actions to provide displaced families, Individuals and businesses maximum opportunities in selecting replacement dwellings within the community's total housing supply. Affirmative Action shall take . place to lessen racial, ethnic, and economic concentrations; and facilitate desegregation and racially inclusive patterns of occupancy and use of public and private facilities. •. Notification of Availability of Payments • As soon as it is ascertained that a family or business displacement is imminent, the Community Redevelopment Agency shall provide them with written,notification of the specific types of relocation payments for which the displace is apparently eligible and the estimation of the benefits that may.be received. . Housing Referrals Current and continuing information wipe provided on the availability, prices of comparable tales and rental dwellings. Assurances will be provided that, within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, there will be available comparable decent, safe, and sanitary replacement dwellings meeting the Collier County Minimum Housing Standards, equal in number and available to eligible . . persons and businesses who will be displaced. Supportive Services Necessary advisory services will be provided to eligible persons and businesses, such as counseling and referrals with regard to housing, financing, employment, training, health, welfare and other assistance in order to minimize any hardships incurred. - - . Each eligible person shall be assisted in completing any required applications and forms. RELOCATION PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS r Case File Records: Case file records shall be maintained for each displaced person/ family or business. Record keeping standards shall follow the HUD Relocation Handbook as guidance. . • • • • �.:. . 105 • . 9A Management Control System: A Management Control System shall be established to identify the size and composition of the • . displacement/relocation workload. Management Control Standards shall follow the HUD'Relocation Handbook as guidance. . • Opinions of the County Attorney Opinions of the County Attorney concerning legality of actions or procedures shall be sought and incorporated•as required. Notices and Correspondence Notices'to affected parties and decisions shall be in writing or a part of a written case file record. Written records shall be kept in accordance with Collier County policy. Procedural Guidance and Standards HUD Handbook 1376.1, Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition shall be used as guidance • • for procedures and standards for displacement activities. APPEALS PROCEDURE • A formal appeal procedure has been established and maintained for use by displaced persons and businesses seeking administrative review of agency determinations in connection with displacement payments and/or adequacy of replacement housing. Appeals•of•this Displacement Policy must be presented in writing. The Community Redevelopment . Appeals Panel consisting of the Administrator of the Community Development and Environmental Services Division and one resident property owner of affected area appointed by the County Manger is assigned the administration of appeals of the Local Displacement Policy. Timing for Initiating Appeal An appeal concerning eligibility for, or the amount of, a displacement benefit shall be filed within six months after the Community Redevelopment Agency's notification to the person of its determination of a displacement case. An appeal alleging failure to provide appropriate housing referrals or to properly inspect the replacement dwelling shall be filed not later than six months after the person's displacement. • Appeal The appeal may include any related statement of fact or other material. Assistance to Person Making Appeal If a person or business is unable to prepare a written appeal, the Community Redevelopment Agency shall offer them appropriate assistance and notify them of other available sources of assistance. • Scope of Review of Written Appeal: • . The Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel shall consider a person's or business' written appeal, regardless of form. In deciding the appeal, the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panelshall • consider: ' 1) All applicable rules and regulations;• • • •2) All pertinent justification and written material submitted by the person making the appeal; and • 3) All material upon which the Community Redevelopment Agency based the determination(s) being • appealed and any other available information that is needed to insure a fair and full review of the appeal. '106 • - 9A • • However, the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel must ensure that the person making the appeal has had reasonable opportunity to review any such materials and information on which an adverse ruling on the appeal may be based. . . • Request for Additional Time • If a person or business makes a request for additional time to gather and prepare information for a written appeal, the person or business must be granted 30 days additional time, in addition to the time limits established by this policy. This request must be documented by the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel. Determination and Notification after Written Appeal • Within 30 days after receipt of information submitted by a person or business in support of their appeal, _ the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel shall make written determination on the appeal and furnish the person with a copy. The written determination shall include, but need not be limited to: 1) The Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel's decision upon review of the appeal; • •2) The factual and legal basis upon which the decision is based, including any pertinent explanation; • 3) If any payment or other relief to the person or business is granted, a brief statement on how this will be provided; • 4) If the relief requested is not granted, a statement of the person or business right to appeal to the County Commission within 30 days. • • • • • • • • • I • • • - I If 107 • 9A APPENDIX A 12 C 1 9A RESOLUTION NO.2000- 82 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; MAKING FINDINGS; FINDING BLIGHTED AREAS EXIST IN THE COUNTY; FINDING THE REHABILITATION, CONSERVATION OR REDEVELOPMENT OF SUCH AREAS IS NECESSARY IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST; FINDING A SPECIFIED AREA TO BE A BLIGHTED AREA AND A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT WITH OTHER RESOLUTIONS AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has received and considered a report and presentation by County staff and consultant which identified conditions within the boundaries of Collier County In the areas identified,described and depicted on Exhibit"A"attached hereto and made a part of this resolution(the"Area"); and WHEREAS,after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions In the Area and has received and considered such other evidence of the conditions in the Area as have been presented to It,the Board of County Commissioners desires to proceed In accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part III,Chapter 183,Florida Statutes,to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can be accomplished in the Area and that certain actions are appropriate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present in the Area; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The Board of County Commissioners does hereby find: (a) Based upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Board of County Commissioners,the following conditions exist In the Area: 1. Conditions are present in the Area that are detrimental to the sound growth of the county and which substantially Impair or arrest the growth within the 9A 12 c 1 Area,and present conditions and uses in the Area are detrimental to the public health, safety,morals and public welfare;and 2. There is a predominance of inadequate or defective street layout; and 3. There is faulty and inadequate lot layout in relation to size, adequacy,accessibility,or usefulness;and 4. There are unsanitary conditions as such relates to the conditions of the sanitary system and there are unpaved and deteriorating roadways resulting in unsafe public conditions;and 5. There has been a deterioration of site and other improvements; and 6. There is a diversity of ownership or defective or unusual • conditions of title,which prevent the free alienability of land. (b) The notices required by Section 163.348,Florida Statutes(1999), have been timely published or mailed in accordance with said statute. (c) Action must be taken Immediately to prevent further blight and deterioration and to protect and enhance public expenditures previously made In the Area. Section 2. finding of Necessity. The Board of County Commissioners, based upon evidence presented to it and in the public record, does hereby find that one or more'blighted areas"(as defined in Section 183.340(8), Florida Statutes),exist within Collier County, Florida, and, further finds that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area or areas described is necessary In the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County,Florida. Section 3. Community Redevelopment Area. Based upon the facts presented to it and contained in the public record,the Board of County Commissioners does hereby find the Area(as hereinbefore defined)is a"blighted area"(as that term is defined in Section 163.340(8),Florida Statutes(1999),and that such area constitutes a ) 9A 12 C "community redevelopment area" as defined in Section 163.340(10), Florida Statutes (1999). Section 4. Conflicts• All resolutions and parts of resolutions In conflict with any of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed, provided, however,nothing herein is Intended nor should be applied to affect,repeal,alter,amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a'blighted area for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act. Section 5. Severability. If any section or portion of a section of this resolution, including any part of the exhibit, proves to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional,it shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity,force,or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Should either area constituting part of the Area or part thereof shall be severed from the Area and the remainder shall constitute the Area for purposes of this resoluttion. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon Its passage and adoption. Section 7. This Resolution adopted after motion,second and majority vote this /LI day of Dv.pi& ,2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS .. DWIGHT 8.BROCK.CLERK COLLIER • ORIDA L . BY: Ai►ter ••• Attest ai to Cha rt.at ,s TIMO ONST � E,C i R s t goiltur4•only. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY David C.Weigel County Attorney 9A 1 � C 1 EXHIBIT A BAYSHOREAGATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTION BEG SW CNR SECT 2,TWP 50, RNG 25, N 630',E 662', S 427', E 200', N 270', E TO THE E R/W LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE, S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10, SUNSET SUB, E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6,SUNSET SUB,S 92', E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55, BLK A, ROCK CREEK PARK, N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10, BLK B, ROCK CREEK PARK, E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2,TWP 50, RNG 25, S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12,TWP 50,RNG 25, E 870', S 773', W 200', S 735',W 200',S 990', E 460',S 330', E 972', S 1174', SWLY 481', NWLY 523',W 95', SWLY 730'TO THE NELY RNV LINE U.S.41, CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY RNV LINE U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U.S.41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W R/W LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, W TO THE W RNV S TO THE N R/W LINE OF WEEKS AVE,W 761', N 1355', LINE OF PINE STREET, N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2,BLK K, INOMAH SUB,W 100', N TO THE N RAN OF WASHINGTON AVE,CONT NWLY AND WLY ALG NLY RAW LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2, BLK C, INOMAH SUB,W TO THE W RAN LINE OF FREDRICK ST, N TO NE CNR LOT 9, COC-LEE-TERRACE SUB,W TO THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 11,TWP 50, RNG 25, N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2,TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. AND BEG SE CNR SECT 23,TWP 50, RNG 25, N ALG THE E SECT LINES OF SECT 23 AND 14, TWP 50, RNG 25,TO E 1/4 CNR SECT14,TWP 50, RNG 25,E TO THE SE CNR LOT 6, CREWS SUB, N TO THE S LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK,E TO THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAW LINE OF U.S.41 TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W RAN LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N RAW LINE OF WEEKS AVE,W 761', N 1355',W TO THE W RAW LINE OF PINE STREET, S TO THE S RAW LINE OF MANGROVE STREET,W TO THE NW CNR LOT 14, BLK F, HALDEMAN RIVER SUB. S TO THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, SWLY ALG THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14,TWP 50, RNG 25, S ALG THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14 AND 23,TWP 50, RNG 25, - TO THE SW CNR OF SECT 23,TWP 50, RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR OF SECT 23,TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. 9- A BAYSHORE / GATEWAY 7RMNOLE REDEVIZOIMIT lEts • _ _ _...... _ ,....v1-,7 al lllllll lir, 11101 iiiiii I)iiiiiii 1117 . , 41111111 Illiff 14.1: :,,11,,:l .1,1.-.Z....1 iii 15:0:i , WM=i r :2 4.- Evvg.111_1.,:. .or,1011471111111187411111:- :11.1iIII:L ,.: ..--..i"Faf'"1. 1 0:ellii;''',1‘.-ilrit'n:iiiikr4r1111 --,_ ..J,.ittl.:,i.1,,,, td,.. —•,,, div i.-J,.-__ • •1,1, 1101,1,11 11 . ...." .,',.f ..'.":r.il..,TT•# .fOrt Ligqiii • POP 1111m ,,... Z ..• .....!ii'i.22. s. n i — ii 1E . ., siiiimtz 4-. ,..1„,.. ir ... 1 .1 IBM= :::: IIIIIMIIIRU1 LI'j:i'1 Lt 7 .:Mai.. . ‘,......1 Gal MIN MM.;IIIIIMii t . q.. MAI,L. - . ,,, ,,,,. :1 L...- .11 t 1.21P4,1 1.111111101 R. ',r.11 •••••••M=Ii,11i 7.1441.11017:7.11.rL1:11:1''' 1 jalliMillVf ir.,:--- =---..... 47--111111111111 *.'I1:041.111111 7••••••'• I law ...*:#4 ‘"' Pi-il•li i . •1 1 --...,F,!_.,,,,,,, 401,....irlei t-. .__ ..,,,11111111, ,..,/, ,r111!X 01F11 ,111 Nigr t .._ __ _a" . 111.,,-!1....t,',,,..7.4 #'omit..,i..7 III'• • I 1 -, ___ : „,E i',,,-',:: 1 I21? ' 11 ) 1.I.,:<`4 T.,,-,,-,• 1..3-.1...,..„. 'II, -• --,. -, ..,,,I,..j lxvi!..iziiirii:.1: .It 1111.11!1 i woo eilMs 4 itl'fill'l PIP% " "I ' t''h.1.1'1.•ill;ii al."-kir iiilill 17AZiN1111-11! ) i i i' , I 1111111 El Lill' ma.. iii tt.h'''A tf-.... r...ie.115L' - - 1/(1441:i t i .1 1 011110,!14.11~ il;ilt 5' 1 -..E re p 4,14, 1 Viiil 1 ,:iiiiii i..ii. 11 . , ;I.,. • ii. Ilr"--" ,, v ;....., 7.- ..g =/ i , - 'f'.-,- kg r";•-,,--„,-,,-: E.. :r.r.,ak amilb, ir , --.. / •::',1*,.!„.,; :..‘'. :77,7'. ,i.- 7b,' — .•- - "MIT.... , i 1 :r-oiliTirrro =,,r. rir,]).,.• -. I.,-.,:- 1,,.....„--, . 4 ...... ,::, .., I' , .ii',7,.11,!..r, =1, lit,,. ..: t.c. ;......, 1_15_,....(5-411,,ttli.0 1... .611. I la. IE..7,,. ,, 44.4„7,10 ; IV ... A ...,,,o Illiiiminiz mu 1.111111 1111111111111‘3•• 4r ,r,.**V,.''';1'.t. :••...j..1 i11;11V+1 =ii."';IP7114,1-=.4,1 11.1111a: 1,.,_,i,,_ ,y r Ta . L 10 , , ,,1 iiiiimiiiiik,, 111 .. 'A ll'ill - '' V-L'741. 11111111111111111k ,,4.., ,J,l'o11111111. b., , 1111111111.L i ,,4, -hl -I .9.- •.lki P1.,,.4 li . T•414,1 4 4,1,11 riI1111.1•<",•\\:C .... t , r) \I itil11:1B13°..". ' ....,,,,k ..i. Es _ --.,,,,;',.\ .11111111111 i i i it•":=4:.' — . • ••.. - '7.1111.1.I11,11.11,014 11.1 1 oi t•SAIll',. • ‘.4•41L ,.•-"‘'/,'"- IS :II/1'111111 I Hi.li ,;-ii;'.0 :11i11111111011111 ••-•• :Willi Iiiiiiiiii l• ', • • •-... 71!..41--411' I = 1 1 ilirglili - I 4.4 .....--) .... 1'011111H I 111116.011111 IILIPI:• Na7./i'.,4 ............ „„,.....0 - ,.111,11111111,11111: :111 1111111111111,, :011111 lid 11111= 1,11111i 111111."1,1,- 4 r 1 L CT 7: i o--- , # 0............_ 4..") , 0•••••11,11......... 0_... - p.................. 1--- I: 0.....IMO* • 7 13 rum or ; .4 ... ..............- ... 9A 1. 2C1 JMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTION BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25,TWP 46, RNG 28,THENCE E ALG N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30,TWP 46 RNG 29,THENCE E ALG THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30,29,28,27,AND 26 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25,TWP 46, RNG 29,THENCE S ALG THE W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW'AOF SW'/4 SEC 25,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SW'/4 OF SW'/4 SEC 25,THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W OF NW'/4 OF SEC 36,TWP 46. RNG 29,THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF THE W%OF NW%SEC 36,THENCE W TO THE W'/4 CRN SECTON 36,THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 36 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1,TWP 47, RNG 29,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6,TWP 47, RNG 30,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6,THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE W TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1,TWP 47, RNG 29,THENCE W TO THE S'/4 CNR SEC 1 AND THE N ' CNR OF SEC 12,TWP 47,RNG 29,THENCE S TO THE S '/4 CNR SEC 12 AND THE N'/s CNR OF SEC 13,TWP 47,RNG 29,THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THE W'/4 CNR SEC 13 AND THE E'/4 CNR OF SEC 14,TWP 47, RNG 29, CONT W TO THE W CNR OF SEC 14 AND THE E'''A CNR OF SEC 15,TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15.THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 16 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 16,TWP 47,RNG 29,THENCE N ALG THE W LINE OF SEC 16 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9,TWP 47,RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 5,TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6,TWP 47. RNG 29, AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1,TWP 47,RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE E'/CNR OF SEC 1, THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD.THENCE ALG THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY, NLY, NWLY,WLY, SWLY TO THE INTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46, RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 35,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 25,TWP 46, RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B. 9A I T465 t 1 2 C l 475 , i 1 .1 1I n r- . 1iii -r1 N • • • 1::' iiR 1 1 1 u 11111P . 1-- ' ZI ilii! Il ri 1 , a _ LA OMB 1 ' V y• I 0 a ii1 It ... et n ■,„ 'd .li w Ssx2, MallEIF,r, .”. M . M.no% n.) I Q 11111 74..AC ID �./. i: m NP m C "MI / 3r w ry m cn O( ' 40 Z . ell M .n IW N I I • J V i w I o 1 m .. m m -- I I I T47S I T•468 f 9A coire c ty FINDINGS OF NECESSITY AND BLIGHTED CONDITIONS 0.1.1.111111.111 ‘. „. .,...r — Ti' ' a .4. T 1 + /\ M ___.......... . -- l* , _ , , .411 -- „1-ii..; er 4. 'etx' _ , , -It - r l BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA .occ) ir._ 9A Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION Page 1 II. STATUTORY DEFINITION Page 1 III. BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE FINDINGS OF CONDITIONS Page 2 • IV. IMMOKALEE FINDINGS OF CONDITIONS Page 8 MAPS Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Page 7 Immokalee Redevelopment Area Page 13 9A I. INTRODUCTION The first step in creating a Community Redevelopment Agency(CRA) is a"Finding of Necessity"or a finding that one or more geographic areas in a municipality has conditions of"slum or blight", and that there is a need to rehabilitate, conserve and redevelop that area. Accomplished by Resolution of the governing body, this finding means that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment or combination thereof is necessary. On January 11, 2000 the Board of County Commissions directed staff to prepare a Finding of Necessity for two areas with in Collier County: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle and Immokalee. This report details the Findings of Necessity"for the above referenced areas. II. STATUTORY DEFINITION OF SLUM AND BLIGHT IN CHAPTER 163.340 Chapter 163.340 of the Florida Statute defines slum and blight as the following: "Slum Area" means an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, which by reason of dilapidation, deterioration,age, or obsolescence; inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces; high density of population and overcrowding; the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes; or any combination of such factors is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality,juvenile delinquency, or crime and is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. "Blighted Area" means either: (a) An area in which there a substantial number of slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions; 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land; and 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities; or roadways,bridges, or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The following sections detail the findings of blighted conditions in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle and the Immokalee areas that justify making a finding of Necessity for blighted conditions as outlined in Chapter 163, Florida Statute: 9A Ill. BAYSHOREIGATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA FINDINGS OF BLIGHT CONDITIONS Bighted Area jas defined in_Section 163.340 ($.L Florida Statutesl means either; (a) An area in which there are a substantial number of slum, deteriorated or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; The Bayshore/Gateway Redevelopment Area is characterized by a defective or Inadequate street layout. These problems include: inadequate street layout and design; Commercial parking problems; Lack of streetlights along major arterial and most local streets; Lack of sidewalks; and Lack of neighborhood connections. 0 In the Bayshore/Gateway Redevelopment area there are three major collectors, Bayshore Road and Thomasson Drive and Shadowlawn Drive. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum of 100 feet of right of way for collectors. Shadowlawn Drive bisects a residential community with an elementary school and several churches. It is located in the Gateway Triangle area and is a two-lane collector with 11 foot wide lanes. The right-of-way width of Shadowlawn Drive varies from 55 to 70 feet. Shadowlawn Drive does not have sidewalks or bike lanes and does not meet the 100' minimum right-of-way standard. Thomasson Drive is a two-lane facility. The roadway width is twenty feet which does not meet the County's standard of a twenty-two foot minimum width for collector roads. There are no sidewalks along Bayshore Road from Thomasson Road south to its terminous. The commercial areas are located on Davis Boulevard (SR 84), Airport Road, Bayshore Road and US 41. Davis Boulevard, Airport Road and US 41 are the area's major arterials. All are characterized by inadequate off-street parking and no available on-street parking. Along these early-established commercial corridors many businesses were constructed prior to the establishment of development standards for parking. The parking problem has worsened along Davis Boulevard and US 41 due to roadway widening from four to six lane facilities. On-street parking Is no longer available on Davis Boulevard and some of the parking area along US 41 was acquired for the recent road widening of that facility. In some cases, parking lots are oriented in such a way that vehicles must back out into traffic. Most of the commercial areas are not linked to one another so there are no shared parking opportunities. ,-2[cJ 2 /H 9A Davis Boulevard has no streetlights creating a compromised nighttime travel condition. There is very little nighttime pedestrian activity and some businesses have taken measures to secure their properties with bars on windows and chain link fences along the perimeter of their properties. The residential neighborhoods are not linked to one another. The typical local street width is 18 feet in the area. The County standard for local roads is 20 feet. There is no street lighting or sidewalks on most local streets. 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility,or usefulness: The majority of land zoned for commercial development within this area is zoned General Commercial (C-4)and Heavy Commercial (C-5). Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet with a minimum width of 100 feet. Most of the commercial lots in the area do not meet the minimum size of width required for commercial development. The lots accessed off of US41and Davis Boulevard have been reduced in size as a result of road widening projects of these two arterials. The C-4 and C-5 zoning district requires a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet, a side yard setback of 15 feet; and a 15 feet rear yard set back. The majority of buildings are located on or near the lot line,with no buffer. in addition, the entire commercial lots located between Pine Street and US41 were platted years ago when minimum standards were not applied and do not conform to most of today's standards. • The majority of the land zoned for residential development in the Gateway Triangle area is zoned Residential Multiple Family—6 district (RMF-6).The area consists of 359 acres of which 125 acres are zoned residential. There are 402 residential dwelling units within this area. The actual residential density Is far below the approved density for the area,with 1 unit per 3 aces developed instead of the 6 units per acre allowed. The average age of the housing stock is 45- 55 years old. The RMF-6 zoning district has a minimum requirement of 6500 square feet with a width of 60 feet for a single family development; 12,000 square feet with a width of 80 feet for a two-family development; and 5,500 square feet per unit with a width of 100 feet for a three or more family residential development. Most of the residential properties in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for residential development. Some do not meet either of the width or lot square footage requirements. Some of the buildings are non-conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, and setbacks. In the Bayshore neighborhood there is a mixture of residential zoning. The majority is RMF-6 and Residential Single Family-4 district(RSF-4). There are also Mobile Home(MH)and Village Residential district(VR)zoning within the area. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet with a width of 70 feet for interior lots and 75 feet for corner lots for residential development in the RSF4 zoning district. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a width of 60 feet for residential development in the VR and MH zoning districts. /o2(C) 3 . 1� 94 Most of the residential lots in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for residential development. On average the lots in these areas are forty to fifty feet wide. Most of the buildings are non-conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size,and setbacks. 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions: According to 1990 Census Data, 0.10 percent of Bayshore/Gateway Triangle area households lack complete plumbing for exclusive use. In the entire county, this figure is 0.02 percent. In occupied housing units across the county for 1990,only 0.03 percent of the units had more than 1.51 or more persons per room. This figure for the Bayshore/Gateway area is 3.0 percent, reflecting a greater degree of overcrowding in the area (1990 Census). In the Bayshore/Gateway study area, 2 unsafe structures identified from January 1998 to February 2000. Sidewalks and streetlights are almost absent from local streets within the redevelopment area. 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements: Most of the local roads are poorly drained. Properties and roads are frequently flooded. 0 Surface water management problems are present within the entire Bayshore/Gateway study area. These problems include localized flooding and direct discharge of stormwater run-off into Naples Bay. Significant and frequent flooding throughout the Gateway area is attributed to low elevations and inadequate stormwater management systems. Bayshore experiences the same problems. The entire Bayshore area, east of Bayshore Road , south of Haldemann Creek experiences the same significant and frequent flooding. South of Thomasson Drive, many of the local roads are unpaved and are poorly drained. 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land: For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area. For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities or roadways, bridges or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The residential neighborhoods lack connection to one another. The current right of way along Shadowlawn Drive is inadequate to provide needed Improvements and acquisition of additional right of way would negatively impact the community. /I.(CJ 4 /6 9 A . I The commercial lots lack adequate parking facilities. There is no public transportation provided within the study area. The local streets do not meet the County standards of right—of-way width, pavement width, or placement of sidewalks. Housing Affordability(as defined in Section 163.355(8)F.SJ means; An area in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, Including the elderly. There is a great demand in the County for affordable housing. According to the Florida Association of Realtors,the Naples MSA is the least affordable community in the State. In 1996,the median sales price for a single family home in the MSA was $180,000. In addition, only 31% of all dwelling units sold In 1995 were under$99,000. While there are opportunities for obtaining affordable housing In the Bayshore/Gateway Traingle Redevelopment Area, the average 1999 sales price for a single family home was $108,267. The current trends predict that acquisition and rental prices will continue to rise. According to Kiplinger's Personal Finance it is projected that within the next ten years home values in Naples are expected to grow by 75.1 percent. CONCLUSION OF FINDINGS OF BLIGHT It is the conclusion of this study that the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle study area clearly has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout, unsafe or unsanitary conditions, and deterioration of a site or other improvements as set forth in Chapter 163 for designation as a blighted area and that rehabilitation,conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof,of the Bayshore/Gateway study area Is necessary and advisable in the furtherance of the public interest of residents of Collier County. • APCCJ S /7 9a DAYSHOREAGATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEG SW CNR SECT 2,TWP 50, RNG 25, N 630', E 662', S 427', E 200', N 270', E TO THE E RAN LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE, S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10, SUNSET SUB, E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6, SUNSET SUB, S 92', E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55, BLK A, ROCK CREEK PARK, N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10, BLK B, ROCK CREEK PARK, E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12,TWP 50, RNG 25, E 670', S 773', W 200', S 735',W 200', S 990', E 460', S 330', E 972', S 1174', SWLY 481', NWLY 523',W 95', • SWLY 730' TO THE NELY RAW LINE U.S.41, CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY RAW LINE U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAW LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W RAN LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N RAN LINE OF WEEKS AVE,W 761', N 1355', WTO THE W RAN LINE OF PINE STREET, N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2, BLK K, INOMAH SUB,W 100', N TO THE N RAW OF WASHINGTON AVE, CONT NWLY AND WLY ALG NLY RAW LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2, BLK C, INOMAH SUB, W TO THE W RAN LINE OF FREDRICK ST, N TO NE CNR LOT 9, COC-LEE-TERRACE SUB, W TO THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 11,TWP 50, RNG 25, N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2,TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. AND 50. BEG SE CNR SECT 23. TWP RNG 25ANI THE E SECT LINES OF SECT 23 AND 14, TWP 50. RNG 25. TO E 1 CNR SECT14.TWP 50.RNG 25.E TO THE SECNR LOT 6, CREWS BUB. N TO THE S LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK. E TO THE SWLY RAW LINE OF U.S. 41. NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAW LINE Of U.S,41 TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W RAN LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE. S TO THE N RAN LINE OF WEEKS AVE.W 761'. N 1355'. W TO THE W • 13IW LINE OF PINE STREET. S TO THE S RAN LINE OF MANGROVE STREET.W TO THE NW CNR LOT 14. BLK F. HALDEMAN RIVER SUB. S TO THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, SWLY ALG THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK TO ITSINTSECT WITH THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14. TWP 50. RNG 25. S ALG THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14_AND 23. TWP 50. RNG 25, TO THE SW CNR OF SECT 23.TWP 50. RNG 25. E TO THE SE CNR OF SECT 23.TWP 50, • • 6 • 0 /D 9 A : • BAYSHORE / GATEWAY TRIANGLE RBEVELOMBIT AREA . ____ • • . _i -.3—/ .-. .., 1-A muting;e...----. - f--•....- _ .............-A., . •• ••. • .11 WO Lth •-•_,„=VAL=•. ._7=, ./... ..... ••••••• .„!..0.•••• ..,77„...../.• ... . • •••• . .7.. ,• ; --1-1191-1,14"11349E—"-rosm 5--!dr att."!Ilia.r114.16.,.•-•-•. . ...-=•.. ....'" • . . I-ill( . 0•L011 LI I 11•14111111.1111. ' •...:..-.... .7,...----. .. -. It •••-r-r----•-• 'ilk . --: • •„. .., • • 11=---....„:7-.__-_. .:,... • — '174.=• ...... ••• ......,. • -./1011..114_411. • I •. est r-..... .,1,11•3t7711F. rj. _ •••• . -_,1 ,.• - W9---, 1 '(T1.-- Il .,.,•%.1.,,,r,„d•,.. . ...0 -- i• • ,• •,,,, ,.... _ 0 ... " ?''' - •:::,,, • isi — INKIIIIIMili411111 -..• D.44 .=:),:e .".--A._ %44:: . :•-:•: 4..• er= sturei • ulabed1118131: • : •a wo. rim'...- . ' • —_,_____—.,....L• _ _,..- .. „L, -. .......A ''' sumbome ____... •• •fl'•- MOM •IN '•••T JR. ' •. -.7.-„-;:---. , if?,c• ..... • 7 c•,,li i, - • .........Nr. .,.: m . i-'-a ,---- .-47-c. . — ..3,,,,;.4,,,,:h_.__....• zz__ _ ,-.-:-..,-..........L.f.-..• 11111Er,;„11•4011 i(i,*,••,,• jpici;..-_._it ' 1,. ` 1!...,./ s•I.,,;._-alas,....... 7r......., !!..!"311.Erie.HI V+. •,„:1,,,, woo--;,i.iga ipi. .gr. ',9 •I i ! / .--.-•-•, , •-•-.... .:;-...z ,,-1:_• ilai-111.,..,• -. til=14-- •. -- mtia.F-',..;4.•.". ..'ff-, '_., •- . -u.sr.fr I I, I s.,,--.--• /----, • .., •-....p , 4•41 II. ir "" .1"• ...-• ' klki si :4....... .. RI. :,_•...,.. 1;4 MID!: tallt 1 li I ,L',... Albc.........•-?, .•gt. __ 7•••••••••••••••••••, . . i '. ••E'9.11,., . 'C''•• i 1 : _. - G-7 : -...... ,_, -6,VI II"•_ 11111kilii Ilw .. ---- .••,,V1 ,.1: - Ei- /W-ritrvt. 1 b:I ri- Ili• - VII '''''''-- . ,..., ,,,---—I—I:I f-,--t-., n'ii gi .1 .lik ••• - _,-ri:" _,.. ,J lit,t1tift..--64://..a. (,' = , . a Ea •I = 1 II.1 P..'1,11 i- •• r4/,....- '-1 ,r/.....1• M: '....... ,r; '...------,—,,,s,--n ice _ _ , .ini urz,,, ' , --it -:"...-/7` •.- '•.•113.1 If .z.; 4. •--,-.• .47- , • ian:.•.-1... ...:. •. == . •-- i . ..•••.•••• Z-••-•=.• /- TZ.••-•.....rs- \• ! --U7 4 ":" •.-- ••'.4-• : . ---4....7.3r:. .-=.`s• • -'''''..:--) ' --:•--'NA ' .„-17.-4.--•-.,..,-• r _...... --:. .--------__, \)„..... 0‹ ....== -••••*- *". ..--- . • .... . S.\ ......• . -- . . .-* rii vs-.' • )7,4%.....4.i..... ',-. • - 4,. -• ........_ /: 4,--.= - -- -.=:.:,.I, ,., ..,___„, .. -t,:...- -L... -,-,--iiiii. .. - •••• 0 \t-:,--. • „...- .•••• - . , i I, - .,.•••--*....:.:, . - '- Tr., . - ..., ,.- ... - .47 ---***--- ''.4. 1-•.‘4.4.--- -,-- '-te.-A \„r. ---_-..--, _ .., _ fQ ,.,.----, . i•.--",-...-", --. C ,w,...„.,..„,,....,.. ,,,,,,,, .ii!,,r_,,.. .,... •I.. 1.; .1..#t . .fr ....;,-1‘../\! :: i...nt 11•4.1. ..1.11-,,itn,__,_-'1-:._ ::: r..41;,,,,, 40r/ 4 1." •....\I '"i. .•7.111r anro.. - t:-..y 1 I,..-_,-....1.- -.4 .EZ.2E4.•:;••-•;• e..t. j > ,•••.. ''''.1. ' '--r.^..;t•' ! ' as.. . .4.1 -1-- Pr ...g.L....)a ',Z, .,,,,,/ ' - - _ ti-....1 1 MBle— 4" - • ...• . 17, 0-,..••••Ns. . .• 1 ‘ ,...r.1, r • • 1 IOW tlI.Z.11.1111.1a1= -.•f IP •• :• . Z..„ •• l''' F ilP1111V411111111111 . OMNI . =a ,.. ' ,;; 41 `..',•..--IV .7,7_77 . •• 1. • 1 .,„ . „..,., .„.."4.0.0.• iii•uuturAllinniF, ' .% ..\!... ./. ..‘,/-•- . .-... • / 'Ns'''. ./.704' - • . - : 4t1t it/11411104.4W lkil .- ,_. . , ../e.t..' • :•• . . .V..„.••• r. ..,-,-. • ors .. ___'-',.. -.V - " ....:5 . -• •______... ._. .-.. .....,,,....:,...„.,... ., .,: -r-rt _r-_, .....,•,-_ '' V.-, NID •..' 41,,,, 1,.1 -1:-1---:1 ..-------• \ • • ....--- - -I...' ."•,., • • ,.. •••24---- - --..., , .------„-z----------...„,-4.,,. •, .... .74 : ^X?:..----• -- —.. . _,..N. - k' .---;•.7„^-- •,-- ks..7-.---'-'•<. --4 1:t=t,.. '-''.••• '''. • .• /• • •• . -•-.,„ .., -7.- A ,__ I . ..... • ., • • . . ,,,..... .__._:„...,...... ...,.. . .‘1. . \• '••• • ...---. • . . r •-••:: -tamic. —I_ •-=7-• -=t ---,117:- - ......._.: ____ , _.- ''..P .„ . _,......_.._••--- - •..-..-- ......,....., MR . ._......., j': ,........-...---,-,gjw-.-.—.....-, .y ,=• ,-„, . t ..,,,,,,,.. , :„..401,4,7 i ri..:-/P•Alr , .. .. •••••• • 1;1111111Itili1111,11111 I 1111111111 .,4.- . •••1•4• a•If. • ;I, ''•••.'"7. .- I „............-.-.1 • •••••••,C*,..-.• , .. !•• • • 17:-. '1„..ut, 1 . %.4...1-1 .•' ; . . . • -- .• . . • • &41211. :::;;;: •„I4 . .... . ....... L .._• .. • , • • /,' • Limince1311e-• •''f ,. 4 IV. *or ....... 'LAND OS IlDIND • • 0— .0........ 1 i 0—.....•11.•••••• .. . (CP)A • I0 ..........• . ... ... .. • . I 0''•'. 5:A..%''',..31.•3148Ittr....1.1:4".' / 7 /9 • 9A IV. IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA • FINDINGS OF BLIGHT CONDITIONS Blighted Area(as defined in Section 161340 L8). Florida Statutes)means_eithelq (a) An area in which there are a substantial number of slum,deteriorated or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; The immokalee Redevelopment Area is characterized by a defective or inadequate street layout. Most Immokalee residents walk or bicycle to work, school and shopping. Few adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities are available throughout the immokalee study area. Problems include: Inadequate street layout and design Lack of shoulders and guardrails along streets adjacent to deep and wide drainage swales Poor access to Commercial and Industrial parking and access problems Few sidewalks available for a predominately pedestrian population A general lack of neighborhood connections to each other The major arterial roadways are State Road 29, Immokalee Road and New Market Road (SR 29A). State Road 29 is a two-lane facility that widens to four lanes through the small downtown area. The four-lane segment is called Main Street and is the focus of redevelopment and • economic revitalization. It is the only segment with on-street parking and sidewalks on both sides. The two lane segments of State Road 29 north and east of Main Street are two lanes with no sidewalks. New Market Road is a two lane facility with 100 feet of right-of-way and no sidewalks, paved shoulders, or turn lanes. The remaining right-of-way and truck parking is limestone. Vegetable and fruit packing houses and the State Farmers Market are located along this street. Trucks are encouraged to use this street as a bypass road to avoid the downtown area and to pick up goods for transport. The roadway is in poor condition and maintenance costs are high due to damage by trucks dragging limestone on roadway. Although many people walk or bicycle to work in this area, pathway facilities are unavailable. Immokalee Road intersects with SR 29 at the beginning of Main Street. North of Main Street it narrows to two lanes and has a sidewalk on the west side only. Major problems exist along many of the local roads. There are few sidewalks. Typical local street widths are less than twenty feet required in the Collier County Land Development Code and open stormwater systems are adjacent to roadways without paved shoulders or guardrails. For example,south of State Road 29, along 9`h Street,there are deep, wide drainage ditches on both sides of the roadway.There are no sidewalks and no guardrails to safeguard pedestrians and motorists. The roadway width is eighteen feet and there is not enough right of (C) 8 09n • 9A way to construct pathway facilities without converting the open swales to a covered stormwater system, In addition, many residential neighborhoods are not linked to one another and most of the commercial areas are not linked to one another. The Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park lacks adequate water and sewer service and stormwater management facilities to sufficiently handle the projected future development. County Road 846 that leads to Airpark Blvd. is a two-lane facility with narrow lanes and no paved shoulders. This facility does not adequately address the projected Increase in truck traffic due to the future development of the airport and industrial park. 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size,adequacy, accessibility,or usefulness: The majority of commercial lots are zoned General Commercial District(C-4)or Heavy Commercial District (C-5). In the C-4 and C-5 zoning district a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet, with a width of 100 feet for commercial development is required. Many of the commercial lots in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for commercial development. Some do not meet either of the lot width or lot square footage requirements. Existing buildings are frequently non-conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, setbacks, and buffers. The RMF6 zoning district has a minimum requirement of 6500 square feet with a width of 60 feet for a single family development; 12,000 square feet with a width of 80 feet for a two-family development; and 5,500 square feet per unit with a width of 100 feet for a three or more family residential development. The majority of lots are non-conforming and rebuilding on these lots may require the owner to seek a variance from the development standards. In the South Immokalee area over 50%of the platted lots are non-conforming. The majority of these lots are zoned C-4 or RMF-6. A majority of the mobile home parks in the Immokalee community were developed in the 1970's and do not meet the minimum standards and permitted densities. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a width of 60 feet for residential development in the VR and MH zoning districts. It is common in the Immokalee Community to have intensive commercial uses located adjacent to residential uses without adequate buffering between the uses. 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions: According to 1990 Census Data, 1.2 percent of Immokalee' area households lack complete plumbing for exclusive use. In the entire county, this figure is 0.2 percent. In occupied housing'units in Immokalee according to the 1990 U.S. Census, 6.8 percent of the owner occupied units and 16 percent of the renter occupied units had more than 1.51 or more persons per room. This figure is .03 for the entire County reflecting a greater degree of overcrowding in the Immokalee area. Based on the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study,there were a total of 4,957 housing units of those 1,282 or 26% are in need of rehabilitation. 4r(C) 9 • d/ 9A In the Immokalee study area, 19 unsafe buildings and 4 unsecure structures were identified from January 1998 to February 2000. • Sidewalks are almost entirely absent from the redevelopment area. There is a lack of street lighting in the most of the residential neighborhoods. Wide and deep open swales are present in the South Immokalee neighborhoods. They accumulate stagnate water and trash. The disposal of garbage in the Immokalee area is a problem. Lack of adequate dumpsters for the mobile home parks and commercial establishments results in a serious litter problem. The lmmokaiee Water and Sewer District covers approximately 27 square miles and most of the Urban area of Immokalee. However, the geographic area served by the district is considerably smaller. Additional treatment plants and distribution lines will be needed to serve the entire community. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District is under a consent order from the Department of Environmental Protection due to insufficient handling of their effluent. The sprayfieids are inadequate. No new sewer hook-ups can be permitted unless the District can show a reduction of flow to the system. There are a few separate collection systems that were permitted prior to the creation of the district. Those systems need to be upgraded and Included within the district's authority.An 0 example is the Baker Street area which is on a separate collection system. There have been three reported failures since 1997 where raw sewage was deposited on the ground. 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements: Surface water management problems are present within the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the roads are unpaved and poorly drained. In South Immokalee where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide. 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land: For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area. For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities or roadways, bridges or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The residential neighborhoods tack connection to one another. • 10 9A . In a primarily pedestrian community, there is a lack of an integrated sidewalk system connecting residential areas with commercial establishments. There is no public transportation system. The commercial lots along Main Street and First Street lack adequate parking facilities. New Market Road does not adequately address the needs of the semi-trucks and trailers that transport the farm products out of the area. Heavy truck traffic on local streets intrudes residential neighborhoods and has had a negative impact on commercial redevelopment activities. SR 29 does not provide the number of lanes needed to adequately serve the immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. Housing Affordability[as defined In Section 163.355 (8) F.S J means An area in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly. A housing unit is considered affordable if the monthly payments do not exceed 35 percent of the monthly income for principal, interests,taxes, and insurance. According to the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study 36 percent of the households with a mortgage and 40 percent of renter occupied households pay more than 35 percent of their Income for housing. According to the study of those persons making less than $10,000, 72 percent pay more than 35 percent of their income to rent. The median household income in 1990 according to the U.S. Census Bureau was$15,170. Forty- five percent of the population In Immokalee is below the poverty level. The population growth, as well as high seasonal farm labor population, has produced a critical demand for housing according to the 1999 Empowerment Alliance of Southwest Florida Strategic Plan.There is a shortage of low and moderate income housing in the Immokalee Community CONCLUSION OF FINDINGS OF BLIGHT It is the conclusion of this study that the Immokalee study area clearly has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout, unsafe or unsanitary conditions, and deterioration of a site or other improvements as set forth in Chapter 163 for designation as a blighted area and that rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of the Immokalee study area is necessary and advisable in the furtherance of the public interest of residents of Collier County. • • 11 9A MMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28,THENCE E ALG N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30,TWP 46 RNG 29,THENCE E ALG THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30, 29, 28, 27,AND 26 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25,TWP 46, RNG 29,THENCE S ALG THE W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW'A OF SW 'A SEC 25, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SW'/OF SW 1/4 SEC 25, THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W %2 OF NW'A OF SEC 36,TVP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE . SE CNR OF THE W'/:OF NW'A4 SEC 36,THENCE W TO THE W CRN SECTON 36,THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 36 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1,TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6,TWP 47, RNG 30,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6,THENCE W TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1,TWP 47, RNG 29,THENCE W TO THE S %CNR SEC 1 AND THE N CNR OF SEC 12, TWP 47, RNG 29,THENCE S TO THE S CNR SEC 12 AND THE N '/ CNR OF SEC 13,TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THE W CNR SEC 13 AND THE E CNR OF SEC 14,TWP 47, RNG 29, CONT W TO THE W'/CNR OF SEC 14 AND THE E '/4 CNR OF SEC 15, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 16 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 16,TWP 47, RNG 29,THENCE N ALG THE W LINE OF SEC 16 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9,TWP 47, RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 5,TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6,TWP 47, RNG 29, 0AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE E% CNR OF SEC 1, THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD,THENCE ALG THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY, NLY, NWLY, WLY, SWLY TO THE INTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO - THE NW CNR OF SEC 35, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B. is • li 12 01 9A 59p► 1 I 5it? 1 I w _ _ ..._ ... . a o ' M a C _ . x I I I ..wmaiiimimil Lomme- . I .r I I. > g ..:.- x- oC ; kd f , . I'm • \. _ .•or I --= Z O . 1 l` OWI Ai moi 1: :a .. ti.dammimm ! I I I. r_ MINImss.. in k7 " /\/ ij a a.5 4 �r�i "s 1 . p. . _ , yT ii, 0 , 1 p , lii � - z - -°� ! • IS I � -S W , '• W �__' D. Al _ z co • • • 591► 1 I S L V 1 ,�/ 13 p' 12 c 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-83 9 A A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RELATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; DECLARING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO BE THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF ADVISORY BOARDS FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA;PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT WITH OTHER RESOLUTIONS AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has adopted a resolution finding the existence of one or more blighted areas in the unincorporated area of the County and further finding that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment or combination thereof, in such areas is necessary in the interest of the public health,safety,morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County,Florida;and WHEREAS, to carry out and implement the redevelopment powers and actions contemplated by Part ill,Chapter 183,Florida Statutes,within such areas,it is necessary that a community redevelopment agency be created;and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to serve as the community redevelopment agency and have advisory boards consisting of citizens and property owners in the areas providing advice to the Board concerning the redevelopment of the areas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findinas. The foregoing recitals are hereby adopted and Incorporated herein to the same extent as if they were set forth In this section. Section 2. pedaration of Board of County Commissioners as Community }tedeveloumentAoencv. As provided in Section 183.357(1), Florida Statutes (1999), the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,does hereby declare itse9 to be the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency as an additional duty of office, and does further declare that all the rights,powers, duties, privileges, and Immunities vested by Part III, Chapter 189, Florida Statutes(1999)in such a community redevelopment agency are hereby vested In the Board of County Commissioners, subject to all responsibilities and liabilities imposed or incurred. Section 2. Seoarate Least Entity. The members of the Board of County Commissioners are the members of the Community Redevelopment Agency,but the members constitute the head of a legal entity, separate, distinct, and independent from the Board of County Commissioners. Section 3. Creation of Advisory Boards. There are to be created, under separate resolutions by the Community Redevelopment Agency, advisory boards for each component 1.� C 1 9A area of the community redevelopment area In the unincorporated area of Collier County,which shall be composed of citizens, residents, property owners and business owners or persons engaged in business in the area, as provided in the resolution of the Community Redevelopment Agency providing for the appointment of such members. The duties and responsibilities of such advisory boards shall be set forth in the resolution of the Community Redevelopment Agency. Section 4. ConQjcia. All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with any of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repeated. Section 5. Severability. If any section or portion of a section of this resolution proves to be invalid,unlawful,or unconstitutional,it shall not be held to Invalidate or impair the validity,force,or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Section S. )effective Date.Thls resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. Section 7. This Resolution adopted after motion,second and majority vote this IL/14 day of 11(111..,2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF • . • •" ' SIONERS OWIt3tA ' .BROCK,CLERK COWER a NW,FLORIDA i ' TIMOT Or.CONST �j E,C' ERMAN • •f ... 4ttikt.•s $:oto Chairman's hiil,aiturft'onIy. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY 6 )424/_, David C.Weigel County Attorney 2 9A 12C 1 Resolution No.2000-181 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; MAKING FINDINGS;ADOPTING A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; AUTHORIZING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the County Commission adopted Resolution 2000-82 on March 14, 2000, finding the existence of blight conditions In two areas In the unincorporated area of Collier County,as more particularly described In that resolution(such area being referred to herein as the"Community Redevelopment Areal;and WHEREAS, a Community Redevelopment Plan as contemplated by Part Ill, Chapter 183, Florida Statutes(1999),has been prepared which addresses the redevelopment needs In the Community Redevelopment Area;and WHEREAS, on May 18, 2000, the County's Planning Commission, as the County's Local Planning Agency for purposes of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act,determined the proposed community redevelopment plan is in conformity with the County's comprehensive plan for the County as a whole and recommended the County Commission approve the proposed plan;and WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency on May 23, 2000 approved the proposed community redevelopment plan and recommended it to the County Commission;and WHEREAS, a copy of the proposed community redevelopment plan was submitted by the Community Redevelopment Agency to the County Commission, as the governing body of Collier County,Florida,and to Big Corkscrew Fire District; East Naples Fire District;Immokales Fire District;Collier County Board of County Commissioners; and the Collier County Mosquito Control District, as taxing authorities which levy ad valorem taxes on taxable real property contained within the geographic boundaries of the Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS,the notices required by Section 183.348,Florida Statutes(1999),have been published and mailed as required therein. and a public hearing regarding the proposed community redevelopment plan was held. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: 12C 1 9A • SECTION 1, Jncorporatlnn Recitals. The Board of County Commissioners finds, declares and determines that the matters set forth in the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as a part of this Resolution. SECS 2. finding of Conformance with Comprehensive Plan. The County Commission hereby finds, determines and declares that the proposed community redevelopment plan for the Community Redevelopment Area attached hereto as Exhibit W(the "Community Redevelopment Plan" conforms to the general comprehensive plan of Collier County as a whole. SECTION Sr Findina of Adeauacv of Recreational Padgtieee.The County Commission hereby finds, determines and declares that the Community Redevelopment Plan gives due consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreational areas end facilities that are • desirable for neighborhood improvement,with special consideration for the health, safety,and welfare of children residing in the general vicinity of the are covered by the plan. SECTION 4, finding of Relocation. The County Commission finds that a feasible method for the relocation of families who will be displaced from the community redevelopment area in decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling accommodations within their means and without undue hardship to such families is contained in the Community Redevelopment Plan. ECT1ON lot Finding of Maximum Opportunity.The County Commission hereby finds that although the Community Redevelopment Plan contemplates most Improvements will be undertaken by the County or the CRA, the Community Redevelopment Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the County as a whole, for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the community redevelopment area by private enterprise to the extent contemplated by said plan. SECTION 6. Adgotion of Community Redevetoomenj Plant. The County Commission does hereby adopt the Community Redevelopment Plan as the community redevelopment plan for the Community Redevelopment Area and authorizes and directs the Community Redevelopment Agency to proceed with the implementation of the plan. SECTION 7, Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval by the County Commission. • • 2 • • 12C 1 9A SECTION 84 This Resolution adopted after motion,second and majority vote this „1„I„day otni-.• ,2000. • ATTEST: . .• OF f TY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT C.8Rt3O0LERK COLLIER OUNTY,FLORIDA4#611.111f)' • 4114 TIMOT V.CONSTA INE,CHAIRMAN -Attest•as t0•ClitireIIII's •stetitw'"Os: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY LAAA.4;ft—Z. David C.Weigel County Attorney • 3 1 9A RESOLUTION NO.2004- 170 1 F • A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.FINDING A BLIGHTED AREA TO EXIST AND EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. WHEREAS,on March 14, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (Board) adopted Resolution No. 2000-82, finding a specified area of Immokalee to be blighted and creating the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area;and WHEREAS,on March 26,2004, the Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board met and recommended expansion of the boundaries of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area(Area),as set forth In Exhibit A(Expanded Area);and WHEREAS,on April 13, 2004, the Board received and considered a report and presentation by County staff identifying current economic oonditions and considered the applicability of various economic incentives within this Expanded Area;and WHEREAS, after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions In the Expanded Area and having received and considered such other evidence of the conditions in the Expanded Area presented to it, the Board now desires to proceed in accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part Ill, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can be accomplished In the Expanded Area and that certain actions are appropriate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present in the Expanded Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The Board of County Commissioners, consistent with § 163.355,Fla.Stat.(2003),does hereby find: (a) Based upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Board that the following conditions exist in the Expanded Area proposed to be added to the existing Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area: 1. Past conditions continue to be present in the Expanded Area that are Page 1 of 3 9A detrimental to the sound growth of the County and which substantially impair or arrest the growth within the Expanded Area,and present conditions and uses In the Expanded Area are detrimental to the public health,safety,morals and public welfare;and 2. There is a faulty and inadequate lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility,or usefulness in the Expanded Area;and 3. The aggregate assessed values of real property In the Expanded Area for ad valorem tax purposes have failed to show any appreciable increase over the past five years;and 4. There are inadequate and outdated building density patterns in the Expanded Area;and 5. There are unsanitary and unsafe conditions in the Expanded Area;and 6. There has been a deterioration of site and other improvements In the Expanded Area. (b) The notices required by Section 163.346 and Section 163.361 (3), Florida Statutes(2003),have been timely published or mailed in accordance with said statutes. (c)Action must be ta+ken immediately to prevent further blight and deterioration and to protect and enhance public expenditures previously made In the Expanded Area. 4 Section 2. Finding of Necessity. The Board of County Commissioners, based upon the evidence presented to it and in the public record with respect to the conditions found In Section 1 (a),above,finds that a"blighted area"as defined in Section 163.340 (8),Florida Statutes,exists within the boundaries of Collier County in the area identified, described, and depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution (the Expanded Area), and further finds that the rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such Expanded Area described is necessary in the Interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County,Florida. Section 3. Community Redevelopment Area. Based upon the facts presented and contained in the public record, the Board of County Commissioners finds the Expanded Area constitutes a "community redevelopment area" as defined in Section 163.340 (10), Florida Statutes (2003), and hereby adds the Expanded Area to the Immokatee Community Redevelopment Area. Section 4. Conflicts. All resolutions and parts of resolutions In conflict with any Page 2 of 3 9A 1 ?'F of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed, provided, however, nothing herein is intended nor should be applied to affect, repeal, alter, amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a "blighted area" for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act,specifically including Resolution 2003-82. Section 5. Severability. If any section or portion of a section of this Resolution, Including any part of Exhibit A.proves to be invalid, unlawful,or unconstitutional,it shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity,force,or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Should any area constituting part of the Expanded Area be severed from the Expanded Area by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall constitute part of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area for purposes of this Resolution. Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective Immediately upon adoption. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this day of .2004. Afi^ ,^+j BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ` T E:BIft7cK,CI OF COLLIER OUNTY,FLORIDA c.44:24,B Att.es a to.:CkaalitilF By: �n signatUc gals. DONN FIALA,Chairman �• oveQ to forma legal sufficiency: Patrick . ite Assistant County Attorney it"„a Page 3 of 3 94 • EXHIBIT A , , F . . (Sheet I of 2) 1 I Existing&Proposed Community Redevelopment Area • R2EE R20E ' R30E N It u II n o N n Il II N N p It w n 14 n Y 11 n tl 11 II tI h z �y�71w it el owe . f. n_ l . 1 1. `. •`I 11 ailri •1 7 n ■ tt N 1 ` n • �In 11 4•, ,�Propo�ed CRA llt! WIni A11 nI , .�� Y 1 N II ttI- s• ♦•♦ • / 1/ C� 1 it T. It I1 II I1 , I a It ,II II .1 M N n n .l IT II 1 TI MtnbM KIJy ! I 1 N iw/ N - a C*ETannry C vaYI1Wn+IAe Exhibit A ..�.e ► „ . Z‘\Anne b d Added b Comnrlly K$dtltXtININ AIM •••• ---- +-.ry.y,+...+w"..•t.wr r. } • I I . ! I • 1 4 9A F EXHIBIT A (Sheet 2 of 2) Description of the Expanded Areas of the Immoka(ee Community Redevelopment Area(Area) In addition to the area described in Exhibit A of Resolution 2000-82,the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area shall be expanded to include the following areas: Township 46 South,Range 28 East,Sections 26, 27,34 and that portion of Section 35 not already included in the Area;Township 47 South,Range 28 East, the northern halves of Sections 2 and 3;Township 47 South,Range 29 East, Sections 7 and 8;Township 46 South, Range 30 East, Sections 30 and 31;and Township 46 South, Range 29 East,those portions of Sections 25 and 36 not already included in the Area. . vu,w.I�•.•..• .v.<., c.a�r rYaYuo ,'1111U1cK1411 KC.I.UKUS t''Abb 19b 94 BA ( RESOLUTION NO.2004- 354 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OP COWER COUNTY,FLORIDA,FINDING A BLIGHTED AREA TO EXIST, AND EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. WHEREAS, on March 14, 2000,the Board of County Commissioners of Cotler County. Florida (Board) adopted Resolution No. 2000.82, finding a specified area of Immokalee to be blighted and creating the immokelee Community Redevelopment Area (Area).and WHEREAS, on May 25. 2004. finding adjacent portions of the Immokalse Community Redevelopment Area to be blighted, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2004-179,expanding the boundaries of the Area;and WHEREAS,on October 27,2004.the Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board met and recommended further expansion of the boundaries of the Immokatee Community Redevelopment Area,as sat forth in Exhibit A (Expanded Area);and WHEREAS.on December 14.2004,the Community Redevelopment Area Board received and considered a report and presentation by County staff identifying current economic conditions within this Expended Area;and �•.. WHEREAS, after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions in the Expanded Area and having received and considered such other evidence of the conditions in the Expanded Area presented to it,the Board now desires to proceed In accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part Ili, Chapter 183, Florida Statutes, to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can be accomplished in the Expanded Area and that certain actions are appropriate end necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present In the Expanded Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OP COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The Board of County Commissioners, consistent with § 183.355.Fla.Stat.(2003),does hereby find: } (a) Based upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Page 1 of 3 . .. . .-- .....w.«... .+... ..._��....r , nva. yr 8A ,+ 9A Board that the following conditions exist in the Expended Area proposed to be added to the existing fmmokalee Community Redevelopment Area: 1. Oast conditions continue to be present in the Expanded Area that are detrimental to the sound growth of the County and which substantially Impair or arrest the growth within the Expanded Area,and present conditions and uses in the Expanded Area are detrimental to the public health,safety,morals and public welfare;and 2. There Is a faulty and inadequate lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility,or usefutness to the Expended Area;and 3. The aggregate assessed values of real property in the Expanded Area for ad valorem tax purposes have failed to show any appreciable increase over the-past five years;and 4. There are inadequate end outdated building density patterns in the Expanded Area;and 6. There are unsanitary and unsafe conditions In the Expanded Area. (b)The notices required by Section 163.346 end Section 163.381 (3), Florida Statutes(2003),have been timely published or malted in accordance with said statutes. (c)Action must be taken immediately to prevent further blight and deterioration and to protect and enhance public expenditures previously made In the Expended Area. Section 2. !mitre of Necessity. The Board of County Commissioners, based upon the evidence presented to it end in the public record with respect to the conditions found in Section 1 (a),above,finds that a"blighted area"as defined In Section 163.340 (8),Florida Statutes,exists within the boundaries of Collier County in the area identified, described, and depicted on Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and made a pert of this Resolution(the Expanded Area),and further finds that the rehabilitation,conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such Expanded Area described Is necessary in the Interest of the public health,safety,morals or welfare of the residents of Colter County,Florida. SectIon 3. Qpmntunity Redavelopa}gnt Area. Based upon the facts presented and contained In the public record, the Board of County Commissioners Ends the Expanded Area constllulea a -community redevelopment area"as defined in Section 163.340 (10). Florida Statutes (2003), and hereby adds the Expanded Area to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, Page 2 of 3 I0/)U £JUJ .L .<.! £. (‘,..711,404GPO I',1IMIJIG.'1 MEW 1[Gt,ufl)7 rmum up A A 8A .... Section 4. Conflicts. All resolutions and parts of resolutions In conflict with any of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed, provided, however, nothing herein Is Intended nor should be applied to affect, repeal. alter, amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a "blighted area" for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act.specifically Including Resolution 2000.82. Becton 5. Severability. If any section or portion of a section of this Resolution, including any pert of Exhibits A and B,proves to be invalid,unlawful,or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to Invalidate or Impair the validity,force.or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Should any area constituting part of the Expanded Area be severed from the Expanded Area by a court of competent jurisdiction.the remainder shall constitute part of the immolotlee Community Redevelopment Area for purposes of this Resolution, Section S. Effective Date. Na Resolution shall become effective Immediately upon adoption. This esoluton adopted after motion, second and majority vote this // y of /)edan/ 1.2004. ATTEST.,,•sOCMD BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIO, :firgiCILT•ierdt OF COLLIER OUNTY.FLORIDA 13 el" 0410 tie • r: 'r"►3 n Tr. By: ''�r p' t i •" ' s s DONNA IATA,Chairman c'•• * foM legal sufficiency: Sr, 4111 trick L. h Assistant County Attorney Ibm�M o 12.1t1-64 Dols RK'0 1"'•110J 4 601414 Papa g of 3 L.4.4,50/it UW 1b:17 •L:iyl746g1 8 M1NUI9 ES AND RECORDS PAGE 09 , H • • ` ----------o----------------i---e-rs-F q ,,\\ S�\ �x �p Ian g N- \ n, w C' e i!r( srt•✓ \ ..... 1041\t&.. .tip -•��•` ` Cm 1 4.4 ri wo,„f • ziartuit f 1 e 4:#44 -,z Er-!.---,---iiiiin _ I :z /5,, ... ......y., mi • . -,..,kiii, :s cg I ir ' 11 1 �. T" .4 . h• -- A o 1 . ;i,---ttd- 'it- ::a'Jt 1 w � . CII :g 1 -1I; C' 4 C" jr � IC AH " }r I g / g g � 'j� c...4-CL.-..c...4-CL.- 1i 11 la 11 l 1 i ..._1 1 ',0,..„ ss% a Ise $ 4 4" 414 i r • NX �R tri �* g- 1 c.,.01/2005 16:25 2397748408 MINUTES AND RECORDS PAGE 9 A 8A EXHIBIT B Peecription of the Expanded Areas of the Im anokalee Community Redevelopment Area In addition to the area described in Exhibit B of Resolution 2000-82, the Initaokalee Community Redevelopment Area shall be expanded to include the following areas: The southern halves of Sections 2 and 3, Township 47 South, Range 28 East; and the portions not already included in the Redevelopment Area of Sections 12, 13, and 14, Township 47 South,Range 29 East. 9A .00212244,4 ORDINANCE NO. 2l]o0-42 CM ge 11i ` AN ORDINANCE OF COLLIER COUNTY, 41; 11 1 1 t b' FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING A qt. REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; .c4 >ittty PROVIDING FOR THE FUNDING OF A REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND FOR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; DETERMINING THE TAX INCREMENT TO BE DEPOSITED IN THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; ESTABLISHING THE BASE YEAR FOR DETERMINING ASSESSED VALUES OF PROPERTY IN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA FOR TAX INCREMENT PURPOSES; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT BY TAXING AUTHORITIES IN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; APPOINTING THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AS THE TRUSTEE OF THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; EXEMPTING CERTAIN SPECIAL DISTRICTS FROM THE ANNUAL REQUIREMENT TO APPROPRIATE INCREMENT REVENUES TO THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND AND D C7 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE F y' PREPARATION OF AN INTERLOCAL _t AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTING EACH SUCH g:;: EXEMPTION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVER .12.a • ..,. DATE. ;,;; m u) �o y WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-82 adopted by ttfir nCoity Commission of Collier County,Florida(the"County Commission")on March 14,2000,it was determined that one or more blighted areas exist within Collier County.Florida,and that the rehabilitation,conservation or redevelopment,or a combination thereof.of such area is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County;and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-83 adopted by the County Commission on Mardi 14, 2000, the County Commission created the Community Redevelopment Agency of Collier County,Florida(the'Agency");and • WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-10 adopted by the County Commission on June 13, 2000, the County Commission adopted a community 1 9A redevelopment plan (the "Plan") for the community redevelopment area as fully described in that Resolution and in Exhibit"A"attached hereto and made a part hereof (the"Community Redevelopment Area");and WHEREAS, In order to plan and implement community redevelopment within the Community Redevelopment Area It Is necessary that a redevelopment trust fund be established and created for said area as provided In Section 163.387, Florida Statutes(1999)(the"Act");and WHEREAS, it is appropriate and reasonable for certain special taxing districts to be exempted from the requirement to make an annual appropriation of "increment revenues"to the redevelopment trust fund being created by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, notice of the County Commission's intention to create a redevelopment trust fund has been published in a local newspaper of general circulation and maNed to all"taxing authorities"(as hereinafter defined)in accordance with Section 163.346,Florida Statutes(1999); NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA: SECTION 1. There Is hereby established and created, In accordance with the provisions of the Act,a Community Redevelopment Trust Fund(the"Fund")for the Community Redevelopment Area,which fund shall be utilized and expended for the purposes of and in accordance with the Plan, Including any amendments or modifications thereto. Including any"community redevelopment."as that term is defined in Section 163.340(9).Florida Statutes(1999),under the Plan. SECTION 2. The monies to be allocated to and deposited Into the Fund shall be used to finance "community redevelopment"within the Area according to tax Increment revenues attributed to the Area, which shall be appropriated by the Agency. The Agency shall utilize the funds and revenues paid Into and earned by the Fund for community redevelopment purposes as provided in the Plan and as permitted by law. The Fund shall exist for the duration of the"community redevelopment"undertaken by the Agency pursuant to the Plan to the extent permitted by the Act. Monies shall be held 2 9A in the Fund by Collier County,for and on behalf of the Agency,and disbursed from the Fund as provided by the Agency. SECTION 3. There shall be paid into the Fund each year by each of the "taxing authorities,"as that term is defined in Section 163.340(2),Florida Statutes(1998) except for those special districts exempted from such requirement, levying ad valorem taxes within the Community Redevelopment Area, a sum equal to ninety-five percent (95%)of the Incremental increase in ad valorem taxes levied each year by that taxing authority, as calculated in accordance with Section 5 of this Ordinance and the Act, based on the base tax year established In Section 4 of this Ordinance(such annual sum being hereinafter referred to as the"tax Increment"). SECTION 4. The most recent assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of property prior to the effective date of this Ordinance shall be the assessment roll of taxable real property in Collier County, Florida, prepared by the Property Appraiser of Collier County, Florida,and certified pursuant to Section 193.122, Florida Statues (1999) reflecting valuation of real property for purposes of ad valorem taxation as of January 1. 1999 (the "base year value"), and all deposits into the Fund shall be in the amount of tax increment calculated as provided In Section 5 hereof based upon increases in valuation of taxable real property from the base year value as reflected on the preliminary assessment roll of taxable real property In the community redevelopment area In the unincorporated area in collier County, Florida, prepared by the Property Appraiser of Collier County, Florida.filed with the Department of Revenue pursuant to Section 193.1142,Florida Statutes(1999). SECTION 5. The tax increment shall be determined and appropriated annually by each taxing authority, and shalt be an amount equal to ninety-five percent (95%)of the difference between: (a)That amount of ad valorem taxes levied each year by all taxing authorities on taxable real property located within the geographic boundaries of the Community Redevelopment Area;and (b) That amount of ad valorem taxes which would have been produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for all taxing authorities,upon the total of the assessed value of the taxable real property in the Community Redevelopment Area as shown upon the 3 9A assessment roll used In connection with the taxation of such property by all taxing authorities,prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 6. All taxing authorities shall annually appropriate to and cause to be deposited In the Fund the tax increment determined pursuant to the Act and Section 5 of this Ordinance at the beginning of each fiscal year thereof as provided In the Act. The obligation of each taxing authority to annually appropriate the tax increment for deposit in the Fund shall commence immediately upon the effective date of this Ordinance and continue to the extent permitted by the Act so long as any indebtedness pledging"Increment revenue"is to be paid and so long as the Plan Is in effect. SECTION 7. The fund shall be established and maintained as a separate trust fund by the Agency so that the Fund may be promptly and effectively administered and utilized by the Agency expeditiously and without undue delay for its statutory purpose pursuant to the Plan. SECTION 8. The governing body of the Agency shall be the trustees of the Fund and shall be responsible for the receipt,custody,disbursement,accountability, management,investment and proper application of all monies paid Into the Fund. SECTION 9. Pursuant to Section 163.387(2)(d),Florida Statutes(1999), the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,as the governing body of Collier County, Florida, does hereby exempt the following special districts from the annual requirement to appropriate"increment revenues' and cause that amount to be deposited In the community redevelopment trust fund created by this ordinance: East Naples Fire District;Collier County Mosquito Control District;Big Corkscrew Fire District; and Immokalee Fire District. The appropriate County officials and consultants and advisors to the County and the CRA are hereby authorized and directed to prepare in conjunction with each such special district an interlocal agreement establishing the conditions of the exemption, including the period of time for which the exemption is • granted. SECTION 10. Any and all ordinances or resolutions or parts of ordinances or resolutions In conflict herewith are hereby repealed. 4 SECTION 11. lf any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or 9 A unenforceable for any reason,such holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this Ordinance,which shall remain In full force and effect. SECTION 12. The Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, Is hereby authorized and directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to each of the taxing authorities and to the Property Appraiser of Collier County,Florida. SECTION 13. This Ordinance shall take effect Immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County the 13 day of June,2000. ATTEST: • ` = BOARD OF • • •�' ' TONERS f••DUIIQHT C.MACK-,CLERK COWER C•• TY,FLORIDA •.•••., • 4W: _ TIMO 'ONSTA . r, ,Lf+rfi _ tttr�e**kali tt •= t?Jt y. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY This ordinance flied with the Sg�etory of tote's Office tM ..1t. day of_ a pnD and acknowledgement of that Min received this day David C.Welgel owwy County Attorney 5 9A EXHIBIT A BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTION BEG SW CNR SECT 2,TWP 50,RNG 25,N 630'.E 882.S 427',E 200',N 270'.E TO THE E RNV LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE,S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10,SUNSET SUB,E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6,SUNSET SUB,S 92',E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55,BLK A,ROCK CREEK PARK,N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10,BLK B,ROCK CREEK PARK,E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2,TWP 50,RNG 25,S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12,TWP 50,RNG 25,E 670',S 773', W 200',S 735',W 200',S 990',E 460',S 330',E 972',S 1174',SWLY 481',NWLY 523',W 95', SWLY 730'TO THE NELY RMI LINE U.S.41,CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY RIW LINE U.S.41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U.S.41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W R/W UNE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE. S TO THE N R/W LINE OF WEEKS AVE.W 761',N 1355',W TO THE W RNV LINE OF PINE STREET,N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2,BLK K,INOMAH SUB,W 100',N TO THE N R/W OF WASHINGTON AVE,CONT NWLY AND WLY ALG NLY RNV LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2,BLK C,INOMAH SUB,W TO THE W RAN LINE OF FREDRICK ST,N TO NE CNR LOT 9.COC-LEE-TERRACE SUB,W TO THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 11,TWP 50,RNG 25,N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2,TWP 50,RNG 25 AND THE POB. AND BEG SE CNR SECT 23,TWP 50,RNG 25,N ALG THE E SECT LINES OF SECT 23 AND 14, TWP 50.RNG 25,TO E'''A CNR SECT14,TWP 50,RNG 25,E TO THE SE CNR LOT 8.CREWS SUB,N TO THE S LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK,E TO THE SWLY RMI LINE OF U.S.41,NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U.S.41 TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W R/W LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE,S TO.THE N RNV LINE OF WEEKS AVE.W 761',N 1355',W TO THE W RNV LINE OF PINE STREET,S TO THE S RAN LINE OF MANGROVE STREET,W TO THE NW CNR LOT 14,BLK F.HALDEMAN RIVER SUB,S TO THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, SWLY ALG THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14,TWP 50,RNG 25,S ALG THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14 AND 23,TWP 50,RNG 25, TO THE SW CNR OF SECT 23,TWP 50,RNG 25,E TO THE SE CNR OF SECT 23,TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. ..• 9 A 1 • BA YSHORE / GATEWAY MARE RIZIEVEIOMEIIT AREA .. .. .. - • -, ,.I., A.m.! -..,.,,_....;,;...,..-.T:•-!. , !..,..,,,,i;,,T ,:-..!.1 : Ol 11.1111111-1i I h7-:(f,-h .-,_, I,',___.-I-::::ii•,,11 ': ',:i:.,.:1 f ' ',.:i • , ,,.:....,....,1,, E , .,,,,,f,,,: .4.. . , ,, , ....1e111 .1117,;4:Ziunil .,.r, ,!..___I j•_1.,'Ll't'll'/!.7. I jiljJfeijjjjtit,i j . • ,, :.,,,...,'i:i:.•E i'EE t'-'-."11,411.11111/ _1 ...-c- , nl Vi,-:1:..,,,,,,:' c.11,•, ,,__1 J I r, •11 .____AII,J ' '-J-. 1114 1.H(.'!.!..4 :' 71.-.17111111111.1';1':A.111 in .; ; 111111111111;:Ang I ifiEgillil MI Ir."mm, :'....r,111FL . i ..e. 16... inirrIllilisioranimm., . . —. la MI Iliiilig : '..,_,_ 111!1;41:# '1 -i:::1---- Eli 7, ,1-.-,.illf,imen•-::+,: 1114M71„rf • ift„ k iqr.'''-- -.='_1.''' '.Lr. ' L' '_ "L''. _'! ... 1.0.11 mg, .__.%, .7_.= mil...MI-, '•,,, ',-., iingilligin 1,r,..•i , 11,..7:7::'7.1 11'i Ey' --"-.' 10:12":- Efi . ..1....•.6.1----- f ,•••-• 141 ,-, - pun,_ ..a.,..111 „..i p ,... ,,, - --7:777;•:-.,`.".gl1:1:::1:1.itinallit'.;§ II ip\s... I...,.., .-1---,--!-----'1 ''•.. -4'......" *4.7, 6 •,,t.1411 i•FT ' ''''•'''' • II he/Al...2-1 .';''' -:-.'• ):. '"' :or:--,i r'i,•:,:r.:',.. -70 1!',z11:41:,':!.1 i 'I 1 •-• !t_.- !--'/"!....!":-'1 111011- '. -11111; :,::!..•!,'11. 'i;i'll,-,:.71i I 1" 2t1*\---V- ' 11'.- %•%:' _•I_Nri,i-r:77-.'::114'"IV'Irl:i! i , ;1,,.....„,,L..;„,.. ,._,.... ..:: . y--..,2_14..__ mum i pi ,...1,,,,,...T.__ ,I li',_DIA Villy!•-'7.:"; ,......7.0; 14 L. - /1-27,*94 l' AriPij 1_ 11--Iter; • i'-'It-i\s v.! ---m-.4,„-i'lv,, i,„ I 4 ,..._,, , .. ., ,,404:::::,':.„.-ri-,',.-;:::,,,,-T::,-_:,„:..,_,...,i7,7--..,,:•AW;;-,- 7 T 117. - !.1,'.;,,, ! .,' .• :1/..--. *Apr e- , ....ip ( i ,': .,,..4 .,T,„ 77--. ;,,,,„-],-, Allr ra- ,-, -,...,- .." A%1 IIIIIMIlitifiglir1111F- -:, 4 ,1 '' *. —141i P'4,,,;"';C,'-*:•.• .j"-...;,,,,jj,:',r-',..+,!::i7'7-71'. ' iL • , '' smith 1:0:t. 'Or:00 .,1. Ali 111!"2.N.IP\ \NW - it-crinT717,1•:1-L'ir -.. :;,,,:L7.-.,7". AV!,;..2...)ts.,..o.., -.. in' i' 4:.,..:::.% '1.2i.'`,. -',.':'.' ",*t*IN 40 . __,_._..,. .___,A.4.• ,,-.7 ' ';:-:....=•!._,J1 74,:••.;ii;i•'''"J......'..................... - MMIMIIIIII.;1:t:':,=.7.:f:."...!".•:;r1;;;:::!'.......',:l....:;::.-`.‘Zill. IMP. . 0. j ..klut,•11,...M I ti, 1111111111111i ilk.A..,",iri any anti: .......9 L,1,.r.iirrl,,:_ msxmosasor-"ii111.4•1/1111 -. ---- li ••• 11.1111111111111111111111' 111111.1.111111111.1.1 I ...., 1. • //:// i0•••••• i . i 13................ , (3.,,,..„,„„...... 1 0•••••••••••• .• - O.. • • .ei• M1"21%.4954Wit.- 1 . . • .........._ Q • JMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTION BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25,TWP 48,RNG 28,THENCE E ALO N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30,TWP 46 RNG 29,THENCE E ALO THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30,29,28,27,AND 28 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25,TWP 48, RNG 29,THENCE S ALG THE W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW'/OF SW'A SEC 25,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SW 1A OF SW/.SEC 25,THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W'/a OF NW%OF SEC 36,TWP 46,RNO 29,THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF THE W i4 OF NW'A SEC 36,THENCE W TO THE W%CRN SECTON 38,THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 38 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1,TWP 47,RNO 29,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6,TWP 47,RNO 30,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6,THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6.THENCE WTO THE SW CNR OF SEC 8 AND THESE CNR OF SEC 1,TWP 47,RNO 29,THENCE WTO THE S%CNR SEC 1 AND THE N'''4 CNR OF SEC 12,TWP 47,RNG 29,THENCE S TO THE S'''A CNR SEC 12 AND THE NY.CNR OF SEC 13,TWP 47,RNO 29,THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THEW Y.CNR SEC 13 AND THE E'/,CNR OF SEC 14,TWP 47,RNG 29, CONT W TO THE W' CNR OF SEC 14 AND THE E'/+CNR OF SEC 15,TWP 47,RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15,THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 18 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 18,TWP 47,RNG 29,THENCE N ALO THE W LINE OF SEC 18 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9,TWP 47,RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 5,TWP 47,RNG 29, THENCE W ALO THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6,TWP 47,RNG 29, AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1,TWP 47,RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE E%CNR OF SEC 1, THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD,THENCE ALO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY,NLY,NWLY,WLY,SWLY TO THE INTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46,RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 35,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 25,TWP 46,RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B. _ __._.. i $ In . II s tri �� m w at rat Pn N M i R 1 �� 3 N hN W t 11 j 1 .m.........--_ j r Z v , J f g h N 17 4. 1!1111. Q i, 1 o ••• g 1 a co �. r= ■ 01#4,,toe .=.. .. .. • ..- II hilik I tot:,..---1 rf 7►f #44.11IF i■ Ill 11111111211 Mill i 1111= ac i I N y— an co 1 i1 p II iit biI N I 11 '1 1 Z—....e=tr U, mmW N O N It N V j I S 9tr L I SAtri • 1 1 1 1 i 1 • • 911 •1 1 • r i I 1 • STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) • I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2000-42 rr Which was adopted by the Board of County CommissioW a _ NL to t the 13th day of June, 2000, during Regular Session. tri o in WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Boards! c viT1 County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 14a day of June, 2000. - • DWIGHT E. BROCK :' Y' y Clerk of Courta)and Clei c�.,:•1 ' • Ex-officio to Board of ' ''�•)l,> ?` ' County Commis anere "E By:Karen Schoch, ,,: ; Deputy CleYZc' . ;• . ....• 9A APPENDIX B S9S, 1 I SLb1 9 A w w O ' O M inX CY o •i — / — i ILiiimew i 4 IIS{IA. ' ' < 1. VIII / 1-1-I t F iy . , .4i/ Ai r Y �/'� 1.; .W.,._,__1 o Z 1 • wo 4 1 W W , • pr y ��., VIII 111 II OQ O �� ^ .,1 M I r�II W U w w0 g ,r.r, 1 W All /i• � 11•r 0 C _—_� r 1fir:—y^-cl'`�1:Prt s... ... . —= Ili_ w = W X lil t ®rr V I iki.i �1 )i' �' ICr1� III 1��■ lig `'' S0;414 1 It igs i ,� I iii II MillibliNifidg VII -Hurl•"rgiiiiirri'• .-. I , in: 111 �rm.+ < I MINIMA:: 1111�o. r t W I li lig r 9 • r W m NM Ce li-J Ot 1 i Nil N a 1I P CC Q' d Ct r a S9ir1 I SLbI 9A APPENDIX C . I 1;113 ' If lit ' • - .... .(... ' 4-- Ill lilii!!! 1 i .4 Z • It' , fit-II! �i ;! , Ili i li1i} .... '.. ..aw_ I �; iiIpIij1iit1 •• . \-: -:" 1,,ii,''. 1 Iii to •i.':' i r •.�ei � �.g .:fr lid •' t • ' ~ ;; .. .._ . i i.:" :.,:- : I ,;;;;.. i.1:71-..-.....„,---. \'' --,\;§,Til-7--;f-—. . ,,.; ., .. i • . , , J.,,,,.. 1. 1 \ ; 1 :,: •ii 41. oi +, _.. , i I N1 , tin it M flitY i ,• ,r:.,.,,..1:-.:..4 I \\ ,. trio-tit ihipii , 'i1.' .-t ' ,....,S:.\•,...,%-\ '4. . . t 'Pr• \�'n.:: .:,,tom l< 111"::::11:!...1.• . w: . i• •-waw `' � \ \L__-y: ' -__ - 111. II..-luL N. -- \:I .1,:, S t 9 j. • *4 1(I 4 :1i11111111111111! 1 I fli 1 i III /1....---.11...11:-.1;1::;•la 1 II 5 Irli 311 ' I li I I ti- . 2' — , i ,_ H,..* 1(11 1 -. i 1 I r ‘.., 1 11 t ..I *IF:. III... ...:......L . ... ... •,,-;11,0.:-...: • .{. '''''' lit t* --ii..,:ft Fr: II k Ili 1 i ' tai •``fir. ..' ::.:-:::: . a '4-: fl; / 1 I ! 1 '° f I 1(1II,1111IIII 0 ci * IfillftVi ia,.. (.3 I 1 DI li x. fttti !1 • � V ' r' 1 . r•im 53 al*131) . • ....__ ..... _ . 9 ! ,. ____..., iiitilitiri. • ce-18 ! Jr:7---, .., .. • plifili I , ,.. ii ,..,,,.,:1,...,..„.....i.....,.___ k I------;m1---------:;---7-1-7.-,:',...--,11,611 3.-i--z ;--.;-1 ... . II11111 - . :...1r-- ....:.T.,72.2.'::::,-,..:.-..:::t.L.:-:..::,-..ft I li !; If 2.11, ;lir ti ...... -- • -—-(- -: :-:....,•_::._,—.7.- -:•:._i :.-,,I (t • -2:::::)] ,r.i., ' lir"...-N----1."--1.----: ir 4 \-.--.....:_•-,,...........-...:::-.,_. , - - ,....A.. --. e. .\; , ,--,. / . g ..). j 415-/- " 11111 .-4 /-•,..,.‘.2.,':...'•::,,`, 1.,.......,./ *--,-. \.,N.\( I.. 7.f!--zt..I. U. • ..,j ,.....Z I I I . _ .. f' 1 Ilf l _,..., __El ---:- • • ; ,i),___, , 1 d il / , , • <:-.1\ >,-.. Ili 1 ••.'N-',- ------- :::-''''' (I • ' ,./ '. I la ; I i -- V) \ - ')-- -\ N.-"--., (,,.,.:\--------- _::::,__-.:_,- -_-_:::, • _. ..., ,-, ,....• f --,-,..:::,..,0-•-; . ,.....:) 1 ....._, , • ! ifi 1 -----,------- .,1 , i 1 j i / _____ _ ,sic.1_11:j I . . .:.1 IIIIIIII It 1 1 k \ :.:.:::...1!-•/----.'-':''-''-..:-..1..,--'... I: _ f f ...,,,, 4-- .•..____, V il it. ii-- - . , 1 i , • , -74-66C.'"•--'-P ' • ,---1 i Y.-1.LI. -....A ;1 1 if II ii ....._ 1, , ..,_...1..r.3 II. q 1 -' 1 ! it '0 11 fi ,•-; if:-'•-• ,,' -11 p ;i'•_=-1.1. i ....________.;.. I ' 1 ' If '! 1' ' Si I. r ,• I I t i q N...A\N-N I . , 1 , 1 i; .:11 1 p - , . , . ,. i li ..... ... . I'll .: N./1%( .;.X11:11:'--X. .:1-k-:: l.:.,‘,;,'7. .. .k.c.XXX.;•74k.......- 1 4' ' • / :I • , ' . !i: L...,. Cmat!..1! i. —../ ' - 11111 1 li'l . i •' 4 ! ; i L - • i ;% ._ - ":;:•::,-:_-.`11 i . . il!. --...- I/ , 0.. . . , if fl. ..11:15Ear..:::::: -;-..4 ----TI ..::-: It II. a 1 i II It/ .) II. : ' tel if - I/I 11 i *II ii I w .. r's • a I 1 --ti fl 1ff • 11, ?fill! 1 •' 11"lit . ....:. It , 111: % iiiiiii 1 \ I ft. z _ - 11,11 i ill it I T._pi ) 1 , ii_ i • ..> ,,,,, x.,.:.::...... . .„„ __11. g \- .._ ..! !::z.t ..., _.... .. ........., • 6 i I OPT . . i •• a ' r 1-2,-:::,\.. (k i if IF i ..L...1,- / ,:-.. wK-) 1 1 fi.41 I • • •!.- ,! 1 :i 1 ,.i. ";•-•::,,, , ..- ••,A 1 • ..-.:!....,......-- •-• — " ._ .. iffifir lif 1 ° ill * 11111111 t Ig1111 11 -1 - o N r & g 2 gt Pi ifif IJI f ,„ II lit of ill a 4 1 '19 gr'9 1 at I I 1 le s. la it a L...co z 31 0 66 pi @ 0: I ilf L is 4 w' c, f 1 I B o * a 1 _ 1 E a 1 8). 1 1 11111 Q. .... Gt, g II 2 B 1 tit a .... .... 8, . a c=rp 0 igr 'WA • .• • - . 9A ' R •V tilt! iii. a.I ; iiiiir ., - -.,,' ... - -. - - el$1 • 111111111111 i r t 1 '1,1 • • r '' ii i! :r , . a.:, r.1 j,; N. ��.. - , I' i. i I, j % G. 1111•1111111f PI/11111f 1/11111i1 /11 I I I ° i II til $ iiiII1EIll111II ; . ill ! I ill i . :, :pia, If i 11141 ! 4 (44. ; ii ,g, . g Er) 1 Oil -'11 1'14 1 wri g ,..q g & P. I 2 4 i I C) T. a I. @ a -sq PP E 1111 0 Ft et— glif • a a 13 .4 -... Igt , I 1 r-. .66 I R cel. i 1 1 9A APPENDIX D • •• • 'APPENDIX D- Gateway Triangle Stormwater Master Plan - 2006 9 A • • • GATEWAY TRIANGLE CONCEPTUAL STO.RMWATER'MASTER PLAN •• TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Section 3..0 • . Alternative No. 3A • Alternative No. 3A is a variation of Alternative No, 3 'developed in 1998 for the Gateway Triangle Conceptual Stormwater Master Plan. Alternative No. 3A is based on the future land uses established in the new Bayshore and Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan. Alternative No.3A also includes projects that are currently under design to address existing problem areas. • For areas undergoing complete redevelopment, permitting will require provision of an onsite stormwater management system to attenuate.the 25-year, 3-day storm event. In addition, water quality improvements are required.The developer of the redevelopment areas will be required to construct a stormwater management system.Thus, improvements by the County are not required for the areas that Will be completely redeveloped. Areas that are assumed to have new stormwater management system built as part of redevelopment are described below. • • The area west of Commercial Drive defined by US-41 and Davis Boulevard is designated a moderate activity center which includes a. hotel, restaurants, offices and other commercial • uses. Complete redevelopment of this 14.8-acre area is assumed. M The area bounded by Davis Boulevard, Commercial Drive, US-41 and the Linwood Outfall Ditch is designated office/warehouse, This 25-acre area could either undergo complete redevelopment or existing users may remain in upgraded facilities. Improvements for this area will be identified for the case bf upgrading existing facilities instead of complete redevelopment. • The Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan identified two potential stormwater pond sites in the ' redevelopment areas. The ponds are located at the westernmost point of the Gateway Triangle adjacent to US-41 and Davis Boulevard acid between Linwood Avenue and Francis Avenue west of the Linwood Outfall Ditch. Actual stornnwater pond locations will be determined during the design phase of the redevelopment. The Gateway Triangle east of the Linwood Outfall Ditch is projected to undergo restructured development. Restructured development does not include complete redevelopment. Thus, . developers will not be required to provide comprehensive stormwater management systems. • Redevelopment provides the opportunity to create detention areas and regrade the site to improve drainage conditions. Restructured development does not create open areas for stormwater detention nor does it allow for elevating structures. Restructured development limits stormwater management improvements to providing detention in open areas and working within the existing topographical constraints. Stormwater management improvements in the restructured development areas will be made to • address existing drainage problem areas, The drainage problem areas in the restructured . d 1 development area are listed below. s• _ LK/0.W029S 29166.RT.RFP • • 34 • 9A • • • • Gateway Triangle• conceptual Stormwater Master Plan • • Technical Memorandum • I ■ Kirkwood Avenue—Only if the area does not undergo complete redevelopment. •• ■ . Property fronting Davis Boulevard north of Wild Pines Apartments.- 11 The Linwood Outfall Ditch,especially property on Manorca Drive adjacent to the ditch. • ▪ Pelton Avenue at the intersection with IJS-41. In addition to the improvements reconunended to address problem areas,additional maintenance and rehabilitation of the existing stormwater management system•is recpmmended for the restructured development area. Additional maintenance will restore the hydraulic capacity of the stormwater management system. Additional hydraulic capacity will decrease the duration 9f flooding since the water can be conveyed more quickly through the system. Rehabilitation only will not significantly decrease the frequency of flooding, except perhapt in cases where flooding • • is minor and caused by a clogged catch basin, pipe or swale. Additional maintenance and • rehabilitation will allow the existing system to operate at its maximum capacity, which will provide'the highest level of service for the existing system. The specific maintenance activities are provided below. • 1. I.egrade swales every two years — 36,000,feet per year including the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 31,500 feet per year excluding the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch. 2. Mo9r and clean sales once per month—36,000 feet per year including the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 31,500 feet per year excluding the area between Commercial Drive and.the Linwood Outfall Ditch. • 1. Clean pipes and catch basins one additional time per year--75 catch basins including the • area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 55 catch basins excluding the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch. • • The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Study includes identification of one site for storrawater retention within the Shadowlawn Neighborhood Focus Initiative. This site is the ' property recently acquired by the County for use as a stormwater detention site. The project has been named Pond 2A. A piping network will convey the runoff.to Pond 2A, an approximate 2.5-acre proposed stonnwater detention pond located adjacent to the Linwood Outfall Ditch."Discharge from the pond will be through an overflow structure into the Linwood Outfall Ditch. During low flow • conditions stonnwater will be routed to the detention pond. Piping is provided for higher flow • - conditions to discharge into the storm sewer on Commercial Drive. The County has purchased the detention pond site and the project is under desigin. This project includes 13 catch basins, 1950 linear feet(lt)of 24"RCP and 450 If of 18"RCP. The project Includes construction of the • Pond 2A detention pond and improvements to the Linwood Outfall Ditch. • Kirkwood Avenue west of Avondale Drive is a major problem drainage area. A storrnwater management system including additional catch basins and piping connected to a detention pond are recommended to improve drainage conditions in this area.Nine catch basins are proposed to • collect runoff. Storm drains'will include approximately 1100 If of 15" RCP, 450 If of 18"RCP • . and 350 If of 24" RCP. These quantities do not include catch basins and'storm sewers that are included in the Kirkwood Extension project. • I •Gwwoaxi4293-:1166•xt:REr 3„2 • • 9A • Gateway Triangle • { l Conceptual Stormwater Master Plan • • Technical Memorandum 1 • • Parcels that•front an Davis Boulevard north of Wild Pines Apartments have drainage problems, especially at Naples Rent-All.The northern half of the parcels drain to Davis Boulevard while the southern half originally drained to the Linwood Outfall Ditch via overland flow. The Wild Pines Apartments were constructed with a perimeter berm. This berm impedes the southerly overland flow from the parcels fronting on Davis Boulevard.An extension of the catch basin and storm. sewer system on Kirkwood Avenue.is recommended to address this problem area. The Kirkwood Extension project will require 5 catch basins,4 manholes, 125 If of 15"RCP, 166 If of 18"RCP and 411 if of 24" RCP.Drainage easements are required for this project. This project has been designed and should be bid by May 2000. • Pelton Avenue is another drainage problem area, specifically near the intersection of US-41. A system of catch basins and pipes is recommended to address problems in the area by diverting a significant part of the basin drainage away from the Pelton Street/US-41 intersection into an • existing drainage ditch that connects to the US-41 system.This project requires 12 catch basins and approximately 1500 feet of piping ranging in diameter from 15" to 24". Improvements may be needed in the existing drainage ditch. • . Drainage problems are reported along the Linwood Outfall Ditch.A particular problem area is a low-lying home on the west end of Manorca Drive. Improvements to address this problem include expanding the Linwood Outfall Ditch. Widening of the ditch will provide greater storage volume. In addition, berming the ditch may help • - alleviate flooding on Manorca Drive. Figure 2 shows the proposed improvements.Table I provides a conceptual capital cost estimate. Table 2 provides a conceptual O&M cost estimate. • • • • • • • • • i, LKAVORw61914.1166•RT.Ak.!• 3-3• } • I 1 • • 9A • • • • • • � TABLE 1 . , • • • • ALTERNATIVE NO.3A . CONCEP'T'UAL CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE' • Estimated" Estimated Project Construction • Project • Cost(S) Cost(S) • Detention Pond 2A and Piping 410,300 535,000 Kirkwood Avenue 144,400 190,000 (West of Avondale) • • • Kirkwood Avenue Extension 78,0004 89,800' • Pelton Avenue • 122,700 160,000 • Linwood Outfall Ditch • . 49,800 65,000 • TOTAL 805,200 1,039,800 Ii Notes: • ii • Property costs are got included. • • 2 Itemized construction cost estimate is provided in the appendix. a Estimated project costs includes 15%contingency, 12%engineering and 3%admin. 4 Detailed construction cost estimate based on design drawings is included in appendix. S Estimated project cost includes estimated construction cost and actual engineering cost. • • • • • • • t`v 3-4 9A , ' • . • • • • TABLE 2 • • ALTERNATIVE NO.3A CONCEPTUAL O&M COST ESTIMATE • • • +rateway Triangle Gateway Triangle' •East of Commercial Drive East of Linwood Cost(s) Outfall Ditch . Cost(s) ' Regrade Swales • First two years • 84,000 73,500 • Subsequent years 21,000 18,500 Mow&Clean Swales 18,000 15,500 • Clean Pipes&Catch Basins. 17,000 12,500 TOTAL ANNUAL COST — First two years 119,000 101,500 1 Subsequent years 56,000 46,500 ••• • • • • • • • • • uovicu Uoss.11166•riramp 3«5• • • • • • • ' . . . �� ' ' • . •. ' ' �� ! ° � � . . . . ` . ^ . . . � . . ____ ' . , . '- ( ' ' ` ' ' . ' , ~- � . . ' . , . ' ' . � . ' ' ' ! ^ ' ' | . . . . ^ . . . . ' ' | i . ' | ' . . ' . . . ' ' . . . ' ` ' • . ' . , , . . . . . . . . . . . �� ^��~`~~�~~ ~~ ' ~ | / ' / ' . . ' � ` , . . . � / . ' . . . . . . ` . � . . ' ' ^ ' ! . . � . ' ' '. . . j ' � . . . ' ' } . . ' ' ' . i . . . ' . . . . . ' ^ ' ' . . . ~~ . • , . . . . . . . • . � . i . . . � «�- . � . . ^ . . . . ' . . . • ,_-. . _ ' . ~ -- -~ ' - ' ' . . . 9A • • . • Table 1 Detailed Cost Estimate-AlternatIve 3A Rounded Unit Construction Project Project Description Quantity Units Cost($) Cost•($) Cost($) Cost($) Kirkwood Ave.(West of Avondale) 24" RCP • 350 If 90 31,500 18"RCP 450 if 75 33,750 • 15" RCP 1100 If 65 71,500 Manholes 0 as 2000 0 • Catch Basins 9 ea 850 7,650 . • Subtotal 144,400 187,720 190,000 . Kirkwood Ave.Extension 78,000• Person Ave. • 24• RCP 400 if 90 38,000 ' 18"RCP 500 If 75 37,500 15" RCP 600 If 85 39,600 s Catch Basins 12 ea 850 10,200 • . Subtotal • 122,700 159,510 160,000 • Linwood Outfall Ditch" Excavation 4150 cy 12 49,800 84,740 65,000 Detention Pond 2A and Piping 24" RCP • 1950 . If 90 175,500 • 18"RCP 450 11 75 33,750 Manholes 1 ea 2000 2,000 • Catch Basins 13 ea . 850 11,050 • Excavation-Pond 13,000 cy 12 158,000 • Excavation-Ditch 2,500 cy 12 30,000 Discharge Structure 1 ea 2000 2,000 Subtotal 410,300 533,390 535,600 GRAND TOTAL 950,000 * Refer to project cost estimate • *" Based on 850 ft ditch excavated 5 ft deep with 35 ft width • • • • • • • • • • i 9A Kirkwood Avenue Extension . Drainage Improvement Project Opinion of Probable Construction Cost •• Unit item Unit Price Quantity' Cost • Standard Manhole,Type P.8 ea 1960 4 7840 Catch Basins • index 233(Type 0) • ea 3400 . 4 13800 Index 232 (Type D) da 1726 2 3450 15"RCP if 37.5 128 • 4800 . • 18"RCP If 46 168 7470 24"RCP If 80 411 24680 240 Snout e5 300 6 1800 Concrete Cradle en 200 3 60Q Roadway Restoration asphalt sy 5 327 1635 . Umerocic base course sy 8.5 327 2126 • Asphalt Overlay • sy 3 • 854 1982 Sodding sy 1.25 .250. 313 Seeding • sf 0.12 820 98 { Connection to existing pipe ea 200 1 200 • 1 Mobil.,Demob.,Bonds,eta. Is 3700 1 3700 Subtotal 74253 • Contingency at 5% 3713 • i • TOTAL 77$86 • f •• ' • . • . •1 w7. _9 A , . . tg 2 Ipi g r Q g • . . r1 • 0 • LW) / 0 A /�' yr At IIIIF : 1 1 , 7A.D11, ,. 1. . ri14 I • I I l• . 2iiti . 1 . . 1 14..., oli &I''-1 if +wMu orucv oz'a:ot.w..Aa DRi u +atlsilatlsets\n 94 APPENDIX E gq �,,of 1 9.14114 ' , • • f. ; : : 1.14 M 11”111 1 ; . . . i . 1 < : I 4442CC4 4i1g1 "ig4i . . 28 Z • E! t ! ; . : t • • L i i 11106111111 / ! : ! LJr . i • Il LTIIiHi ' ' ' ' üu _ : ' lipid , . . r " J = III t I 11M ii OflDIww f 11. fi § [ , COi 1 I If IA I . . . _ 1 II 8 I r I 1 < • . 1; !art� o fR" j LLI 1 : ! iffilli , iii •• n : I_ . ; i ' i i . Ili co ‹ . • m ; ii I .. , I � IJ 1 - LIIJ .oil- wig. t11111111111 ' . . • W I , Il a a 1' �y • , r .. f .-oiii0tIlli,. N . b r.•.�-_ .�- r 0 . • t ! . . . . • . ' . 9 A • • N - • 1111”111Ngil m 1 • 1 . 1 j 1 , -• , . 1 , . i • i 1PTOn °1011101,11W " if ' ; : l • , • 1 1 1 1 1 ! f 1 ° != ` 4110111. 9495- P . _1 18P , 16. 1g114 . . = • • •iirl.4001M511N Ifil$ 5141,g . L . ' 1 41110_ 1°1MR.! ,! gelgt i • i i , t 1-: ' ;. t t t . t 11 i f .. i i ; 07704i411WAlidflO IN- 01 1 i I. 1 F11101g17: 1T ' • P 1 ñ _ • : illi . 1 / 11§'. 1 ; ' ' , a • illiiP44ei ' ' , . L 1 : . $ gels ' �3 . Li ' . • - = Llt401171. o.RE141. illa i . , ! i i. : II • • i L a • ., i Z • I 1 1 ! - 4. wa. 1 I I . 1 , 11< lid . Hiji i ��idliiiii , I. . • 94 • F 1 . ii. 1 .,1 .. . . - . 11401"ibiiJJiiiJi H ' VOR17411i1 i 1 1 .. . .. . 1111011M011 : , , . . ; . ; • . • . 1 " __________, . 111iNSUAggIMmg1111 . . . . . . . • , • - - - H13fratiiliVgimill tii : : . 71 ; ! ri . . 1 r_ ” . 11 :. : li . ! i . . . . ii lips Apro. 1111 I Ii . II ; I i . . : ! : VW latROMIlill ! - t W II , : HIC111114115 ,414f11 )/1 il ! It .1H1 r ; I . . . 1 .... i 1 . 1 1 ! • ..._.„........ gm 5 ,11 ! "11" 11 11111011410;11-1111 ; ! . . . . 1 i 1 z3 . . I . . . . . I X111 ' : I I . a ki qIIIPI ! WiLial I I 11 i .• . 6. 1 kl-wiirigisrgrrip'411 . -It I ! 0 ii.. : 1.11 „ 1 1 .1?-( --:. Ih 'lljiprtip -Pii -gr I 1. 1 1 . : ' WI ; 4 . YmM ► 11 JH '. • . i . ► i 1 94 APPENDIX F 4A T46S ( T47S I T48S I T49S I T5OS I T51S I T52S 1 T53S i R R R„R o£of'x !..:<r ie 6 ,a�d°wd a. i a 6.6=aga a s 31� 3J S l f j^ l '11 1 JL !l [ L [� _®0 i3 i 8x ba .� =7 w 5 a eSaW. 000a�a�aga a;oga a yy . L 3 t 1 IIS 1 ., ib - iU� Jig . CI`ii a w 111 ! I IJ /V ti i ii ;II J I M HI/ lIIOlII1H ImIND ' ii ii N � jg 11111 1w ' 1 ! ! € i l111 iiif 1 I ;iii, CYi l 111J1giolDila i ,1' i I'' 1 'IAd hr 1I I i(' n w I.JV(!16 a.� III § IIIIII [11)ill. b w Q M / — fri II w w ce te — 1 , . , W --10: 1 ) , , ,, 1,.2 --, N kv W11 tu i Ilii '1017 — =1i'''1':1111'1 i a iw ps' m111[111111� 1 N a . : i � ( . .,oft4 $— L I FiC5W . \i all > , i iiS � C,�\ 3 d, P HA - o X i� X• i ra a • I T46S I T47$ I T48S I 149S I T50S I T618 I T52S I T53S 9A • Acct #068839 March 12, 2019 Attn: Legals Naples News Media 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 Re: CRA Notice — Notice of Plan Change Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Saturday, March 16, 2019 and send the Affidavit of Publication, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500191796 9A NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT AND MODIFICATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN the Plan and Resolution. The Collier County Board of County Any person who decides to appeal any Commissioners will hold a public hearing decision made by the Board of County during the Regular Meeting being held on Commissioners with respect to any matter Tuesday, March 26, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in the considered at this hearing will need a Board of County Commissioners Chamber, record of the proceedings and may need to 3299 Tamiami Trail E., Naples, Florida 34112 ensure that a verbatim record is made, for the purpose of considering and adopting an which record includes the testimony and Amendment to the Collier County Community evidence upon which the appeal is to be Redevelopment Plan. heard., Generally, the scope of the Plan as amended Any person with a disability requiring auxiliary and modified, is an update to the vision, aids and services for this meeting may call the policies, and projects instituted by the Collier County Facilities Management Division, Community Redevelopment Agency Board and located at 3335 Tamiami Trail E., Suite 101, provide a time certain for completing all Naples, Florida 34112, or (239) 252-8380 with redevelopment financed by tax increment requests at least two business days before the revenue,. Board of County Commissioners will meeting date. consider adoption of a Resolution titled: Collier County Community Redevelopment Areas A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT Collier County ori AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AS CanmunHyR wvelopmentArea AMENDED AND MODIFIED, TO PROVIDE A TIME CERTAIN FOR COMPLETING ALL REDEVELOPMENT FINANCED BY \lit; INCREMENT REVENUE, THAT SUCH TIME P - 13 4�,0 • CERTAIN SHALL OCCUR NO LATER THAN "'^° 30 YEARS AFTER THE FISCAL YEAR IN • G $ WHICH THE PLAN IS AMENDED AND MODIFIED PURSUANT TO THE iNwsherema COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, CHAPTER 163, PART III, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN N Y , •; EFFECTIVE DATE. , . V it A complete copy of the proposed Collier County a• Community Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Plan as amended and modified, and the proposed Resolution can be obtained from the Collier County Clerk of the Courts, 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Ste. 401, Naples, Florida, 34112 and the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA office, 3570 Bayshore Dr. Ste 102 Naples, Fl 34112. Ph. (239) 643-1115 and the Immokalee CRA Office, 750 South Fifth Street, Immokalee, FL 34142. Phone (239) 867-0026. All interested persons are invited to appear at the meeting and may be heard with respect to Ann P. Jennejohn 9A From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 3:41 PM To: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: Notice of CRA Plan Change Attachments: CRA Notice - Notice of Plan Change (BCC 3-26-19).doc; CRA Notice of Plan Change (BCC 3-26-19).doc Good Afternoon, Please advertise the attacked, which includes a wrap, ovt Saturday, March 16, 2019. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn .,,'..,,• Senior Deputy Clerk `9. $ Office:239-252-8406 11 1 Fax:239-252-8408(if applicable) Ann.Jennelohn@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court &Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tamiami Trail,Suite#401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com 1 9A Ann P. Jennejohn From: NDN-Legals <legals@naplesnews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:38 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: RE: Notice of CRA Plan Change Attachments: ND-2249633 (2).pdf External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Please review. Thank you ! From:Ann P.Jennejohn<Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 12, 2019 3:41 PM To: NDN-Legals<legals@naplesnews.com> Subject: Notice of CRA Plan Change Good Aftervtoov►, Please advertise the attached, which includes a map, on Saturday, March 16, 2019. Thavik you! Ann Jennejohn $�,.. •..,� Senior Deputy Clerk Office:239-252-8406 Fax:239-252-8408(if applicable) Ann.Jenneiohn@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court &Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tamiami Trail,Suite#401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com Please visit us on the web at htta://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/ nWmCORoWVSGOvQYoh22WP-?domain=collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent.If you are not the intended recipient,you must not copy,distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. 1 � a NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT AND MODIFICATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN The Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing during the Regular Meeting being held on Tuesday, March 26, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber, 3299 Tamiami Trail E., Naples, Florida 34112 for the purpose of considering and adopting an Amendment to the Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan. Generally, the scope of the Plan as amended and modified, is an update to the vision, policies, and projects instituted by the Community Redevelopment Agency Board and provide a time certain for completing all redevelopment financed by tax increment revenue. Board of County Commissioners will consider adoption of a Resolution titled: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AS AMENDED AND MODIFIED, TO PROVIDE A TIME CERTAIN FOR COMPLETING ALL REDEVELOPMENT FINANCED BY INCREMENT REVENUE, THAT SUCH TIME CERTAIN SHALL OCCUR NO LATER THAN 30 YEARS AFTER THE FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THE PLAN IS AMENDED AND MODIFIED PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, CHAPTER 163, PART III, FLORIDA STATUTES;AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A complete copy of the proposed Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Plan as amended and modified, and the proposed Resolution can be obtained from the Collier County Clerk of the Courts, 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Ste. 401, Naples, Florida, 34112 and the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA office, 3570 Bayshore Dr. Ste 102 Naples, FL 34112. Ph. (239) 643-1115 and the Immokalee CRA Office, 750 South Fifth Street, Immokalee, FL 34142. Phone(239)867-0026. All interested persons are invited to appear at the meeting and may be heard with respect to the Plan and Resolution. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at this hearing will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure that a verbatim record is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be heard. Any person with a disability requiring auxiliary aids and services for this meeting may call the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail E.,Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112,or(239)252-8380 with requests at least two business days before the meeting date. Collier County Community Redevelopment Areas R FEEL.- ND-22.903 ❑ PROOF O.K.BY: 0 O.K.WITH CORRECTIONS BY: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY•SUBMIT CORRECTIONS ONLINE ADVERTISER:BAYSHORE GATEWAY CRA PROOF CREATED AT:3/13/2019 1:40 PM SALES PERSON: Gloria Kennedy PROOF DUE:- PUBLICATION:ND-DAILY NEXT RUN DATE:03/16/19 ND-2249633.INDD SIZE:3 col X 9.25 in Ann P. Jennejohn 9 From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:43 PM To: NeetVirginia; GarciaShirley; ForesterDebrah Subject: CRA Display Notice running March 16, 2019 Attachments: ND-2249633 (2).pdf Good Afternoon, Please review the attacked notice that will run this Saturday, for a hearing by the Board of County Commissioners March 26, 201.Q. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn �,,,,,w„� Senior Deputy Clerk 0` , Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408(if applicable) • Ann.Jennelohn@CollierClerk.com fry'',•+^'"* Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court &Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tamiami Trail,Suite#401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com From: NDN-Legals<legals@naplesnews.com> Sent:Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:38 PM To:Ann P.Jennejohn<Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: Notice of CRA Plan Change External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Please review. Thank you ! From:Ann P.Jennejohn<Ann.Jennelohn@collierclerk.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 12, 2019 3:41 PM To: NDN-Legals<legals@naplesnews.com> Subject: Notice of CRA Plan Change Good Afternoon, 1 9A Ann P. Jennejohn From: Belpediolennifer <Jennifer.Belpedio@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:53 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn; NeetVirginia Cc: ForesterDebrah; GarciaShirley Subject: FW: CRA Display Notice running March 16, 2019 Attachments: ND-2249633 (2).pdf Approved. Thank you very much.Jen From: NeetVirginia Sent:Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:47 PM To: Belpediolennifer<Jennifer.Belpedio@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: CRA Display Notice running March 16, 2019 For your approval. Dinny Virginia A. Neet, FRP Office of the Collier County Attorney Telephone (239) 252-8066- Fax(239)252-6600 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.com> Sent:Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:43 PM To: NeetVirginia<Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov>; GarciaShirley<Shirley.Garcia@colliercountyfl.gov>; ForesterDebrah <Debrah.Forester@colliercountyfl.Rov> Subject:CRA Display Notice running March 16, 2019 Good Afternoon, Please review the attached notice that will run this Saturday, for a hearing by the 13oard of County Commissioners March 26, 2019. Thank you! • Ann P. Jennejohn 9 A From: ForesterDebrah <Debrah.Forester@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:55 PM To: BelpedioJennifer;Ann P.Jennejohn; NeetVirginia Cc: GarciaShirley Subject: RE: CRA Display Notice running March 16, 2019 Thanks so much! Debrah Best Regards, Debrah Phone 1239.331.3266 Cell 1239.285.8270 From: BelpedioJennifer Sent:Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:53 PM To:Ann P.Jennejohn<Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com>; NeetVirginia <Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: ForesterDebrah <Debrah.Forester@colliercountyfl.gov>; GarciaShirley<Shirley.Garcia@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: CRA Display Notice running March 16, 2019 Approved. Thank you very much.Jen From: NeetVirginia Sent:Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:47 PM To: BelpedioJennifer<Jennifer.Belpedio@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW:CRA Display Notice running March 16, 2019 For your approval. Dinny Virginia A. Neet, FRP Office of the Collier County Attorney Telephone (239) 252-8066 - Fax(239)252-6600 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Ann P.Jennejohn<Ann.Jennelohn@collierclerk.com> Sent:Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:43 PM To: NeetVirginia<Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov>; GarciaShirley<Shirley.Garcia@colliercountyfl.gov>; ForesterDebrah <Debrah.Forester@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject:CRA Display Notice running March 16, 2019 1 9A Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:55 PM To: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: RE: Notice of CRA Plan Change Approved, please publish Saturday, March 16, 2019. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn t.,,,,r}r. Senior Deputy Clerk ��' Office: 239-252-8406 Fax: 239-252-8408(if applicable) • Ann.Jenneiohn@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court &Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tamiami Trail,Suite#401 Naples, FL 34112-5324 www.CollierClerk.com From: NDN-Legals<legals@naplesnews.com> Sent:Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:38 PM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: Notice of CRA Plan Change External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Please review. Thank you ! From:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 12, 2019 3:41 PM To: NDN-Legals<legals@naplesnews.com> Subject: Notice of CRA Plan Change Good Afternoon, Please advertise the attached, which includes a 1 9 A NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT AND MODIFICATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN The Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing during the Regular Meeting being held on Tuesday, March 26, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber, 3299 Tamiami Trail E., Naples, Florida 34112 for the purpose of considering and adopting an A Amendment to the Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan. Generally, the scope of the Plan as amended and modified, is an update to the vision, policies,and projects instituted by the Community Redevelopment Agency Board and provide a time certain for completing all redevelopment financed by tax increment revenue. Board of County Commissioners will consider adoption of a Resolution titled: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AS AMENDED AND MODIFIED, TO PROVIDE A TIME CERTAIN FOR COMPLETING ALL REDEVELOPMENT FINANCED BY INCREMENT REVENUE, THAT SUCH N TIME CERTAIN SHALL OCCUR NO LATER THAN 30 YEARS AFTER THE FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THE PLAN IS AMENDED AND MODIFIED GD eta PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, CHAPTER 163, PART III, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. n A complete copy of the proposed Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Plan as amended and modified, and the proposed Resolution can be obtained from the Collier County Clerk of the Courts, 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Ste. 401, Naples, Florida, 34112 and ,e the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA office, 3570 Bayshore Dr. Ste 102 y Naples, FL 34112. Ph. (239) 643-1115 and the lmmokalee CRA Office, 750 South Fifth Street, Immokalee, FL 34142. Phone(239)867-0026. All interested persons are invited to appear at the meeting and may be heard with respect to the Plan and Resolution. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at this hearing will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure that a verbatim record is made.which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be heard. Any person with a disability requiring auxiliary aids and services for this meeting may call the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail E.,Suite 101,Naples,Florida 34112,or(239)252-8380 with requests at least two business days before the meeting date. Collier County Community Redevelopment Areas haw Caul, r M tiy_' 1111. -.-1 X Abb. „�- Xb'llYLli 9A àtpLrat ' k1itll N NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed.Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na- ples,in said Collier County,Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida,each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida,for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BAYSHORE GATEWAY CRA 2249633 Notice of CRA Plan C 4500191796 Pub Dates March 16,2019 ial Cit (Sign ture of affiant) I ,M*" . KAROLEKANGAS I Public-State of Florida Sworn to and subscribed before me ` •' Con otGG1226041 • `�° .;�'� ' My Comm.WirsJul 29,2021 This March 18,2019 i •..,e }?� eawethvigh moan 0 (Signature of affiant) (/ 34A 1 SATURDAY,MARCH 16,2019 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Islamic State suicides NOTICE OF PROUN MUNT AND REDEMODIVELOPMENT A A TO THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT 7 AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN show peril of final battle The Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing during the Regular Meeting being held on Tuesday,March 26,2019,at 9:00 Philip WW1 ASSOCIATED PRESS =-y+ .. a.m.in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,3299 Tamiami Trail ti " , E.,Naples,Florida 34112 for the purpose of considering and adopting an OUTSIDE BAGHOUZ,Syria—The 1` „..rr-�,,r,,�-.. ”:r '.5 Amendment to the Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan. three Islamic State fighters emerged �`K:sii. ,.+M ;,YGenerally,the scope of the Plan as amended and modified,is an update to from the group's last bastion meastern a the vision,policies,and projects instituted by the Community Redevelopment Syria on Friday acting as though they r. c '� .t Agency Board and provide a time certain for completing all redevelopment wanted to surrender,but when they •: -„,.r-x- reached the U.S.-backed forces that - �.,. II d financed by tax increment revenue. Board of County Commissioners will have them surrounded they blew them- .,.=1. consider adoption of a Resolution titled: selves up,killing six people. Fighting around Baghouz,Syria,the A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY The attacks underscored the strg- last area held by the IS,has slowed REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AS AMENDED gles faced by the Kurdish-led Syrian out of concern for civilians and pris- Democratic Forces as they try to flush aner3.DELIL SOULEIMAN/AFP/GE1TY IMAGES AND MODIFIED,TO PROVIDE A TIME CERTAIN FOR COMPLETING ALL the extremists out of a tent camp in REDEVELOPMENT FINANCED BY INCREMENT REVENUE,THAT SUCH eastern Syria built over a labyrinth of TIME CERTAIN SHALL OCCUR NO LATER THAN 30 YEARS AFTER caves and tunnels-all that remains of SDF said a large number of civilians THE FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THE PLAN IS AMENDED AND MODIFIED a self-declared caliphate that once and hostages were holed up in the IS- PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, sprawled across large parts of Syria and held territory. CHAPTER 163,PART III,FLORIDA STATUTES;AND PROVIDING FOR AN neighboring Iraq. This week, the SDF resumed its EFFECTIVE DATE. SDF spokesman Mustafa Bali tweet- push, but reduced pressure due to ed that the six killed were among doz- strong resistance from the extremists A complete copy of the proposed Collier County Community Redevelopment ens of civilians fleeing the 15-held area and the surrender of hundreds of IS Agency Redevelopment Plan as amended and modified, and the in the village of Baghouz,on the east fighters and family members. proposed Resolution can be obtained from the Collier County Clerk of bank of the Euphrates River.He said Amed said there are no negotiations the Courts, 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Ste.401, Naples, Florida, 34112 and several other people were wounded,in- underway to secure the prisoners're- the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA office, 3570 Bayshore Dr. Ste 102 eluding three SDF fighters.The attacks lease. Naples, FL 34112. Ph. (239) 643-1115 and the Immokalee CRA Office, took place at or near a crossing point An SDF statement said hundreds of 750 South Fifth Street,Immokalee,FL 34142.Phone(239)867-0026. where evacuees are searched. IS fighters and their families surren- Thousands of civilians have left the dered Thursday.Bali tweeted that a All interested persons are invited to appear at the meeting and may be heard IS-held area in recent weeks and some new group of IS fighters surrendered with respect to the Plan and Resolution. fighters have surrendered.But the ex- Friday,without giving further details. Any person who decides to appeal a y decision made by the Board of tes are still putting up fierce resin- No one knows how many hard-core County Commissioners with resoect to any matter considered at this tanantte,,and the SDF said it has slowed its fighters,including foreigners,are still operations out of concern for civilians inside. hearing will need a record of the Proceedings and m 4 need to ensure and scores of prisoners held by the mil- SDF commanders have stopped that a verbatim record is made,which record includes the testimony and itants. speculating when the battle may finally evidence upon which the aooeal is to be heard Friday's attacks underscore how be over.Already some 25,000 people Any person with a disability requiring auxiliary aids and services for this risky the operations are,and how it can have left Baghouz, thousands more be difficult for forces to tell civilians than were originally believed inside. meeting may call the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at from combatants. Commanders say they don't know how 3335 Tamiami Trail E.,Suite 101,Naples,Florida 34112,or(239)252-8380 with An SDF official who goes by his nom many more may still be left. requests at least two business days before the meeting date. de guerre,Ciyager Amed,said IS mili- On Friday the situation was mostly tants are still holding some 300 prison- quiet as aircraft flew over the area con- Collier County Community Redevelopment Areas ers,both civilians and SDF fighters, trolled by IS. 7” adding that their fate is unknown. The capture of the last pocket still The militarycampaign to uproot the held byIS fighters in Baghouz would _ _ , P � P gh Frh militants from the eastern banks of the mark the end of a four-year global cam- ---- Euphrates River began in September, paign to end the extremist group's hold . -- pushing them down toward this last on territory in Syria and Iraq-a self- corner —- in Baghouz,near the Iraqi bor- declared caliphate that at the height of �1 I , der.The military operation has been the group's power in 2014 sprawled __- halted several times since Feb.12 as the across nearly a third of both countries. b.v. _-- NEAL •)MMUNITIES A IN PREMIERE NAPLES LOCATIONS r-. .,. :. a,€ Rin L_LHI fiilI,LE IIvE 0;., 100107111111°7711111111111111111Z s [J,LL-.P A_N UUL UPI I UN l r, 4b11 .i _ �aL_ ' rr_ - � N 1! ,, . ,.. _ . __... , , •._ . . . ,..._„:,:..,. _,,..t.,..-__,,_.___ _ . •• ., .. . • _..... ,. . • _ _ ,..:,____-, ---_:. _ . '--, __ yyp� ,„,,t-c.„,,;-------. ....... �, j _ ,„ . ,...0 ".� ,� , f MM"• +r. ...-:. ® ... . _Jam.' r. n s s » viiiiii if Y Ill 4 ' bA VA' ,. 1 \VALON MARQ ,��l i RICHMOND OF NAPLES I PARK Located near downtown Naples and Situated on 40 acres and adjacent to several A new community in the fastest growing area convenient to white sand beaches.Minutes preserve areas,Marquesa Isles features of North Naples,offers luxurious carriage from the area's finest shopping,dining and well-appointed twin villa homes,located homes.Each beautifully appointed with large, just minutes from Naples'premier shopping destinations while offering beautiful coastal- area,5th Avenue South,offering world- outdoor living spaces which offer everyday inspired carriage homes and the chance to class shopping,gourmet restaurants and opportunities to catch the beauty of a Naples make the most of the Florida lifestyleentertainment optionssunset or sunrise. Carriage Homes from$289,990 1 Villa Homes from$335,990 Carriage Homes from 5288,990 CALL FOR MORE INFORMATION VIEW FLOORPLANS,DETAILS AND MORE AT: 239.347.0763 NEALCOMMUNITIES.COM 2 Please_ee a Neal W—muneies SANS Manager arra re Purchase arreeme"I.tens for dead-and nor rwxneake--.muss corn ie ad trnal Daiwa,S Neal Commonin nor.4 nests reserved 9A neo Bk1iIll rwø NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed.Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na- ples,in said Collier County,Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida,each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida,for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised edt roms an person, or corporation do sa any commission or refund for the purpose of securing this Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 2243024 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA 4500190197 Pub Dates March 20,2019 March 27,2019 ALL ®tea/► (Sign ture of affiant) _,. KAROLEKANGAS I . Wary Public-State ofFlmMa Sworn to and subscribed before me Commission 166126041 This March 27,2019 i "4 BooY�a xwirpaw pno (Signature of affiant) (v/ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, Notice is hereby given that you are entitled,at no cost to on April 9,2019, in the Board you,to the provision of certain of County Commissioners assistance. Please contact Meeting Room, Third Floor, the Collier County Facilities Collier Government Center, Management Division,located 3299 Tamiami Trail East, at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL., the Board of Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112- County Commissioners (BCC) 5356, (239) 252-8380, at least will consider the enactment two days prior to the meeting. of a County Resolution. The Assisted listening devices meeting will commence at 9:00 for the hearing impaired A.M.The title of the proposed are available in the Board of Resolution is as follows: County Commissioners Office. RESOLUTION NO.2019-____ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS W.L.MCDANIEL,JR., OF COLLIER COUNTY, CHAIRMAN FLORIDA, TO DISCLAIM, RENOUNCE AND VACATE THE CRYSTAL K.KINZEL,CLERK COUNTY AND THE PUBLIC By:Martha Vergara, INTEREST IN A PORTION OF Deputy Clerk THE 30 FOOT COUNTY UTILITY (SEAL) EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN March 20&27,2019 No.2243024 O.R. BOOK 1364, PAGE 1030 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BAYSHORE DRIVE AND THOMASSON DRIVE, IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. (PETITION VAC- PL20180003286) A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman,a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 9 A THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is placed on the agenda. All completed routing slips and original documents must be received in the County Attorney Office no later than Monday preceding the Board meeting. **NEW** ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines#1 through#2 as appropriate for additional signatures,dates,and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exception of the Chairman's signature,draw a line through routing lines#1 through#2,complete the checklist,and forward to the County Attorney Office. Route to Addressee(s) (List in routing order) Office Initials Date 1. 2. 3. County Attorney Office County Attorney Office JAB 2/26/4 9 5�15�1� 4. BCC Office Board of County bA Commissioners \N•Y5/ 56\kct 5. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office 5h 5111 :°40 ek( PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the Executive Summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above,may need to contact staff for additional or missing information. Name of Primary Staff Debrah Forester CRA 239-331-3266 Contact/Department Agenda Date Item was -4{948- Agenda Item Number 9A and Approved by the BCC y`23VC\ Type of Document Resolution(9A) Number of Original 1 Attached _ �Pt ✓ 5 Documents Attached PO number or account n/a number if document is to be recorded INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark"N/A"in the Not Applicable column,whichever is Yes N/A(Not appropriate. (Initial) Applicable) 1. Does the document require the chairman's original signatu STAMP OK 2. Does the document need to be sent to another agency for addit sign es? If yes, NA provide the Contact Information(Name; Agency;Address;Phone)on an attached sheet. 3. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be JAB signed by the Chairman,with the exception of most letters,must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. 4. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's NA Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board 5. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the JAB document or the final negotiated contract date whichever is applicable. 6. "Sign here"tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's JAB signature and initials are required. 7. In most cases(some contracts are an exception),the original document and this routing slip NA should be provided to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is input into SIRE. Some documents are time sensitive and requirz forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines! 8. The document was approved by the BCC on 4/9/19 and all changes made during the JAB meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the changes,if applicable.= 9. Initials of attorney verifying that the attached document is the version approved by AB the BCC,all changes directed by the BCC have been made,and the document is ready for the Chairman's signature. I:Forms/County Forms/BCC Forms/Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04,Revised 1.26.05,Revised 2.24.05;Revised 11/30/12 9 A RESOLUTION NO. 2019-7 5 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AS AMENDED AND MODIFIED, PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, CHAPTER 163, PART III, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida enacted the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, which is presently codified in Part III of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, a redevelopment plan must be adopted by the governing body to initiate redevelopment activities within the redevelopment area; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2000-82 declared the need for a Community Redevelopment Agency and authorized the preparation of a Redevelopment Plan for the Bayshore Gateway study area; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-83 established the Board of County Commissioners as the Community Redevelopment Agency to carry out redevelopment activities; and WHEREAS, the Board, by its approval of Resolution No. 2000-181 adopted the Community Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS,the Board of County Commissioners has not approved an overall update to amend the Community Redevelopment Plan since the adoption of 2000-181;and WHEREAS,the Collier County Planning Commission("Local Planning Agency") conducted a formal review at a public hearing on March 21, 2019 and submitted its recommendations to the Community Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, the recommendations from the Local Planning Agency were considered by the Community Redevelopment Agency at a meeting on March 26, 2019 and reviewed for inclusion into the CRA plan, as appropriate; and 1 9 A WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency on April 23, 2019 voted to recommend approval of the amended CRA Plan and transmitted it to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, IN REGULAR SESSION DULY ASSEMBLED ON THIS 23rd DAY OF APRIL 2019 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; that: I. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan (Attachment "A") meets the requirements of Section 163.360, F.S.; II. The Board hereby finds, determines and declares that the notice requirements of Section 163.346 and 163.361(3), Florida Statutes and the public hearing requirements of Section 163.361(2), Florida Statutes have been met; III. The Board hereby fines, determines, and declares that the Plan Amendment conforms to the Collier County Growth Management Plan; and IV. That the Amendment to Collier County Community Redevelopment Area Plan is hereby approved and directs the CRA to proceed with implementation of the Plan. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 2.3 rak day of `\ 2019, after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By _\ A - a� ( e) By: C• Attest as to GhatinMAUTY OL W LIAM L. signature only. • HAIRMAN Approved as to form and legality: Jenmfer A. Bel io 5 Attorney l 19 Assistant County s 2 +i ' 9I I Attachment A AMENDMENT—MAY 2019 COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE IMMOKALEE Community Redevelopment Area Community Redevelopment Area �, , ' Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency G'zP. " y, �, Blvm. M OKAY EE CR Dayshorc Gateway Triangle CRA.Bayshore Beautification MSTU Haldeman Crcck MSTU i The Place to Call Home! l - I 1.. I::d i.A. A ��v�;T.T.,,��,r.�,a�y 1 ,�V I :, � IMMOKALEE CAA BOUNDARY f4 to �T, 1- , HIMOAALEE,FLORIDA ! ,",, 4 7 { A'tr` f I 1 1 r I I : 1 1 1 s 1 1._...1 1 A w a Jl. � 1 cev1 r d nv 1 v ! a I' I ._. 1 .'__„....��0 I , 11 4 t' 4,"'' I i r M1 '1 n ._.. n 1 N ,1 i s n �1 a 1 c 11▪1., `r4'd v !I d 1 i -- • �r {�� W/e +k�I+ � u . : 1 r• 1 l u n v d t o a n ` 1 � cela ' n n 1 1 I �r 1iJs yp _�'>} � ' f 1 t}ltiti ' ti ) 21 .'... n f n ' a : A z r y7 I1T 'i, 241 , n - rhip i 4' 'yY 3 e. f k�r ;' . ): e1 ( Ir.� I. ' r t 1 1 , . ' [:, ) �, r ,'a 1 i marl .it '�, n• r 1 I .:1..1 ..: a n 11 II I Y t. . n I1 , .1 ro ,' i v n n I 88 R 2 t � 111.4f/! ..ifr3 � 4M* i 1 4 -'. ' ' . 6°t 6b. ,Itatpa. �r n .t. a ` e ! n n .. nix n , nln n 1n C I I wfr, ,` #'A'. ; \ T+I. b :.. ` 4[Rt11L. i� P6.......a�lw.wr M 1 yI731 !: t 1 ' ComuMIM"CAEF,ROAWA I ! h s n t s 9 1� t [ �y, I F � 1; :,� N a k n A n tl n 1 7 1 i y.} irdiN GmyMlapn1A11 .d; .1 „..i. y 1 v :+ -1 1 .v-. v a ■ a >?" n a n ,. x n u••.•:i n j a i. f 'vN?d :A•by• f, ...:1--- �.J; ;br .A 1. .4 - Jn... a A��M: i�1Y ':'rY..`�'f'r /A`,:w: .-: ''a, * '.{' h�_yY. Adopted June 13, 2000 First Amendment: May 2019 - 9 A Collier County Redevelopment Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION 1 PLAN OVERVIEW SECTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION 1.2 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT 3 SECTION 1.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 SECTION 1.4 CONFORMANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS 5 SECTION 1.5 THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7 SECTION 1.6 DURATION, MODIFICATION AND SEVERABILITY OF PLAN 9 SECTION 2 FINANCIAL PLAN SECTION 2.1 FUNDING SOURCES 10 SECTION 2.2 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES 11 SECTION 3 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT ELEMENT 12 SECTION 4 IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN SECTION 4.1 INTRODUCTION 13 SECTION 4.2 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT 15 SECTION 4.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 19 SECTION 4.4 COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES 26 SECTION 4.5 REDEVELOPMENT AREA CHARACTERISTICS AND ANALYSIS 28 SECTION 4.6 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS ASSESSMENT 31 SECTION 4.7 REDEVELOPMENT GOALS 35 SECTION 4.8 PHASE I -REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 35 SECTION 4.9 FUTURE PHASES 39 SECTION 4.10 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT STATEMENT 41 SECTION 4.10 PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURES 42 SECTION 4.11 VALUATION 47 SECTION 5 BAYSHORE/GATEWAY REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5-E-1 5.01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5-E-1 5.02 GOALS 5-E-1 5.03 CONCEPTUAL PLAN DIAGRAM 5-E-4 5.04 CHARACTER AREAS 5-E-7 5.05 FOCUS OF REDEVELOPMENT 5-E-9 5.06 FUNDING, PROJECTS & INITIATIVES 5-E-10 5.07 2000& 2019 PLAN COMPARISON 5-E-14 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5-1-1 5.1.1 VISION 5-1-1 5.1.2 PROCESS 5-1-1 5.1.3 PLAN ORGANIZATION 5-1-1 5.2 BACKGROUND 5-2-1 5.2.1 CREATION OF A CRA AREA 5-2-1 9 A 5 2 2 2000 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS AND PROJECTS 5-2-1 5.2.3 BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE CRA 2018 PERSPECTIVE 5-2-9 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK&ELEMENTS 5-3-1 5.3.1 CONCEPTUAL PLAN DIAGRAM 5-3-2 5.3.2 LAND USE& URBAN DESIGN 5-3-7 5.3.3 PUBLIC SPACE, PARKS, & OPEN SPACE 5-3-26 5.3.4 DEVELOPMENT 5-3-31 5.3.5 TRANSPORTATION, CONNECTIVITY, &WALKABILITY 5-3-42 5.3.6 INFRASTRUCTURE 5-3-59 5.3.7 PROCESS 5-3-66 5.3.8 CHARACTER AREAS 5-3-67 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5-4-1 5.4.1 PRIORITIZATION OF PROJECTS& INITIATIVES 5-4-1 5.4.2 FINANCING PLANNING 5-4-1 5.4.3 PROJECTS & INITIATIVES PRIORITIZATION 5-4-5 5.4.4 COORDINATION & PARTNERSHIPS 5-4-17 5.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5-5-1 5.5.1 OVERVIEW OF RELEVANT STATUTES 5-5-1 5.5.2 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5-5-1 5.5.3 ACQUISITION, DEMOLITION/CLEARANCE, & IMPROVEMENT 5-5-1 5.5.4 ZONING & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGES 5-5-1 5.5.5 LAND USE, DENSITIES & BUILDING REQUIREMENTS 5-5-1 5.5.6 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT 5-5-5 5.5.7 SAFEGUARDS, CONTROLS, RESTRICTIONS &ASSURANCES 5-5-5 5.6 TAX INCREMENT& MSTU ESTIMATES 5-6-1 5.6.1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 5-6-1 5.6.2 MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNITS(MSTUS) 5-6-2 5.6.3 UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS 5-6-12 SECTION 6 RELOCATION PROCEDURES 102 FIGURES FIGURES 1 COLLIER COUNTY MAP- 2004 2 FIGURES 2 IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARIES-2004 14 FIGURES 3 IMMOKALEE FUTURE LAND USE MAP 24 FIGURES 4 IMMOKALEE SUBAREAS 36 APPENDIX Appendix A Resolutions and Trust Fund Ordinance 9A I. 2000-82-ESTABLISHMENT OF CRA AREA AND FINDING OF NECESSITY AND BLIGHTED CONDITIONS REPORT II. 2000-83-ESTABLISHING THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY III. 2000-181-ADOPTION OF 2000 CRA PLAN IV. 2004-179- EXPANDING IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARY V. 2004-384-EXPANDING IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARY APPENDIX B IMMOKALEE EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP APPENDIX C BAYSHORE/GATEWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS MAPS -2000 APPENDIX D GATEWAY TRIANGLE STORMWATER MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM -2000 APPENDIX E BAYSHORE/GATEWAY ESTIMATED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT VALUE-2000 APPENDIX F 2012-2025 FUTURE LAND USE MAP 9 A Section 1 PLAN OVERVIEW Section 1.1 Introduction The Collier County Redevelopment Plan (CRA Plan) is a guide for the physical and economic revitalization and enhancement of the designated redevelopment areas. This plan, with its specific components, has been formulated in close cooperation with the members of each community and is based on the objectives identified by community members in a series of public workshops. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency consists of two areas designated by the Collier County Board of County commissioners as redevelopment areas under the authority of Florida Statutes, Chapter 163, Part III, Community Redevelopment Act. The two areas depicted on Figure 1 as amended, were identified by the presence of one or more conditions of blight as defined in the statutes. These findings are contained in Section 1.2 and further specified in the Appendix A and component section for each area. The redevelopment program in Collier County provides the authority granted by the statutes, the means to achieve growth management objectives, by redirecting growth to areas where urban services currently are provided or are needed but currently inadequate, encourages revitalization of once viable neighborhoods and business districts and encourages the provision of affordable, good quality housing within centers of urban concentration. The Collier County Growth Management Plan policies provide the rationale for the establishment of redevelopment areas in the county and recognizes the redevelopment plan adopted for each component area. In addition, each community has formulated their own specific objectives. Each component section describes the history and process of community involvement in each respective community. The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency approved an expansion to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area boundary in 2004 (Resolution 2004-179 and Resolution 2004-384). In 2018, the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency approved a contract with Tindale Oliver Design to gathered data, perform technological analysis and seek public and agency input in order to draft an amendment to this redevelopment plan that would lay out a framework of goals, objectives, and strategies to continue the redevelopment efforts in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area. In 1969, the Florida State Legislature established Chapter 163, Part III, enabling local units of government to declare a need for a Community Redevelopment Agency and outlines the powers available to carryout community redevelopment and related activities. The overall goal of the legislature was to encourage local initiative in downtown and neighborhood revitalization. The Florida Legislature has made amendments to the enabling legislation over the years. This Plan recognizes those amendments. Figure 1 — Updated Map 1 9 A ...____ T n W Ce z p 0 i -J s , v 0 0 R I 0 E w sZ aS �� 11 r '0 N BZaS jig <N ti N Lj 4- Alb,. @ r _ N CMG O1OS3O S Onla O1OS3O �� . 17J g . h".y`y N Onl8 S3OdlOa3n3 S OnlB S30VlJa3nd ., l apJ t e R N �f , CD w A 0'o '6 c$ N,,,,, g Q m t_; Z W w, J o E w \ pma aan�fp \ a r��tr. a Q iii NOAIaNV'•pl o #--171141111 . d O ....• 8 m N Ud Ua NOl.ONinll i1. — """' N ON ON 11nd 1.OdSIV y 0.40.. a 01 •>, 11WVINIV K_,�a,M1 ---'�- z a LOl S.i0f"•wJ'1' ��133"" x._ Z fir=� W U m w U 0 MEx�Go - cN m 0 To E & — — oz U E GULF p a E E O 6.7w 0 ' J a C.D� 2 9 A Section 1.2 Findings and Conditions of Blight In 1969, the Florida State Legislature established Statue 163.00 enabling local units of government to set up Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRA). To assist in redevelopment efforts, these local agencies were mandated to establish Redevelopment Trust Funds, which would serve as the depository for tax increment revenues. The overall goal of the legislature was to encourage local initiative in downtown and neighborhood revitalization. In 1984, the Florida Legislature amended Section 163.335 to include five primary objectives: 1. To address the physical, social, and economic problems associated with slum and blighted areas (F.S. 163.335 (1)); 2. To encourage local units of government to improve the physical environment (i.e. buildings, streets, utilities, parks, etc.) by means of rehabilitation, conservation or clearance /redevelopment (F.S. 163.335(2)); 3. To convey to local community redevelopment agencies the powers of eminent domain, expenditure of public funds, and all other general police powers as a means by which slum and blighted areas can be improved (F.S. 163.335 (3)); 4. To enhance the tax base in the redevelopment area by encouraging private reinvestment in the area and by channeling tax increment revenues into public improvements within the area (F.S. 163.335 (4)); 5. To eliminate substandard housing conditions and to provide adequate amounts of housing in good condition to residents of low or moderate income, particularly to the elderly (F.S. 163.335(5)). To be designated as a redevelopment area, the area must meet the criteria outlined in Chapter 163.340 of the Florida Statute. The area in Collier county were designated as Blighted" which is defined as the following: "Blighted Area" means either: (a) An area in which there a substantial number of slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions; 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land; and 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities; or roadways, bridges, or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. 3 A On March 14, 2000, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners made finding of conditions of blight and adopted Resolution 2000-82 and adopted Resolution 2000-83 establishing the Community Redevelopment Agency. Both of these resolutions are contained in Appendix A. Section 1.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Collier County Growth Management Plan provides land use designations, which describe the intent and allowable density and intensity of appropriate uses for future development. The Growth Management Plan was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in 1989 and has been amended several times since the original adoption. This section identifies the goals, objectives and policies that apply to both redevelopment areas. The goals, objectives and policies that apply to each area specifically are included in Section 4 — Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan and Section 5 — Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan. This amendment recognizes that the Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan will be amended following the adoption of the updated Immokalee Area Master Plan currently going through the public hearing process. Both the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area and the Immokalee Redevelopment Area are located in the Urban Designation as identified on the Collier County Future Land Use Map Appendix F. As stated in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan: Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general portions of Collier County: areas with the greatest residential densities, and areas in close proximity, which have or are projected to receive future urban support facilities and services. It is intended that Urban Designated Areas accommodate the majority of population growth and that new intensive land uses be located within them. Accordingly, the Urban Area will accommodate residential uses and a variety of non- residential uses. The Urban Designated Area, which includes Immokalee, Copeland, Plantation Island, Chokoloskee, Port of the Islands, and Goodland, in addition to the greater Naples area, represents less than 10% of Collier County's land area. The redevelopment plan allows for detailed planning that will encourage the coordination of activities as outlined in Objective 4 of the Growth Management Plan. OBJECTIVE 4: Continually refine the Future Land Use Element through detailed planning in order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development, housing and urban design. Policy 4.8 recognizes the adoption of the redevelopment plans for each component area: Policy 4.8: The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for existing commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses, modifications to development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage redevelopment. Such redevelopment plans may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Board on June 13, 2000; it encompasses the Bayshore Drive corridor and the triangle area formed by US41 East, Davis Boulevard an Airport-Pulling Road. The Immokalee Redevelopment Plan was adopted 4 9 A by the Board on June 13, 2000. Other specific areas that may be considered by the Board of County Commissioners for redevelopment include, but are not necessarily limited to: a. Pine Ridge, between US41 North and Goodlette-Frank Road; b. US 41 North in Naples Park; and c. Bonita Beach Road between Vanderbilt Drive and the west end of Little Hickory Shores #1 Subdivision. The Immokalee Community is governed by the entire Growth Management Plan which includes the Immokalee Area Master Plan (reference FLUE Policy 4.3), a separate element of the Growth Management Plan adopted in 1991 and significantly revised in 1997 and 2007. The Master Plan contains land use designations and policies applicable to the Immokalee area. Significant amendments to the Immokalee Area Master Plan are under review. A review of the land use designation and policies that apply for each area is contained in the individual component section of this document: Section 4 — Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan and Section 5— Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan. Section 1.4 CONFORMANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS Chapter 163, Part III of the Florida Statutes authorizes the creation of Community Redevelopment Agencies and the development of Community Redevelopment Plans. The legislation focuses primarily on the creation of Community Redevelopment Agencies, the powers granted to them and specific criteria of the development of Community Redevelopment Plans. As part of a Community Redevelopment Agency's formation, a Community Redevelopment Plan is created which provides the framework for effective redevelopment of the Community Redevelopment Area. The Community Redevelopment Plan is a comprehensive document that provides the details for redevelopment of the area, including an extensive analysis required by Florida Statutes. In accordance with Florida Statues, the governing body, in this case the Board of County Commissioners, may make subsequent changes, amendments or updates to the Community Redevelopment Plan upon recommendations of the Community Redevelopment Agency. Modifications to the plan require a public hearing process and appropriate public notification. The Community Redevelopment Act requires redevelopment plans to be consistent with the comprehensive growth management plan. This plan is as a whole consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. This plan establishes a vision for the community as a whole, the component areas and its neighborhoods. The CRA's vision will not be achieved overnight or even in the next five years. This plan is intended to provide a framework for policy decisions and public improvements over the next thirty years. For the purposes of this plan, "encourage" means to support, recommend, endorse or seek approval of any project, action, program or activity and can also mean to provide incentives and allocate funds, assets and resources, including participation by staff, employees, contractors, consultants or others if approved by the Collier County Agency (CRA) and allocated through the standard operating and procurement guidelines adopted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners. 5 9 A This plan contains provisions that contemplate actions to be taken by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), including various agencies, departments or boards of the County. While the BCC has adopted this Plan, any recommendations requiring further BCC action will be taken separately to the BCC to approve and authorize implementation of any such actions. The Private Sector The Redevelopment Plan cannot be implemented without the predominant participation of the private sector. The role of the private sector is to evaluate the effectiveness of an investment risk in the Redevelopment Area and to pursue development opportunity consistent with the Redevelopment Plan. 6 9 A Section 1.5 The Community Redevelopment Agency The management structure established to undertake formal redevelopment activities within the Redevelopment Area is the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Act, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners declared itself the CRA. The CRA is a legal entity, separate and distinct from the Board of County Commissioners. The Community Redevelopment Agency will use any and all methods of implementing the plan as authorized by law. The CRA will exercise the powers conferred by statute to take action within the Redevelopment Area such as will result in economic revitalization consistent with the Plan. The Board of County Commissioners has the following powers: • The power to determine an area to be slum or blighted or a combination thereof; to designate such area as appropriate for a community redevelopment project; and to hold any public hearings required with respect thereto. • The power to grant final approval to Community Redevelopment Plans and modifications thereof. • The power to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds as set forth in Section 163.385, Florida Statutes. • The power to approve the acquisition, demolition, removal or disposal of property and the power to assume the responsibility to bear loss as provided in Section 163.370, Florida Statutes. Community Redevelopment Agency Authority This Plan will be undertaken in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969. The County and the CRA may use any and all methods of achieving revitalization of the Redevelopment Area as authorized by law. The following sections generally describe the available development actions. Property Acquisition The Act authorizes the County and the Redevelopment Agency to acquire real property in the redevelopment area by purchase, condemnation, gift, exchange or other lawful means in accordance with this Plan. The County and CRA may acquire real property within the redevelopment area as may be necessary for public improvements. These acquisitions will provide sites for public facilities, eliminate unsafe conditions, removing non-conforming uses, or overcome diversity of ownership and faulty lot layout which prevent redevelopment and contribute to the perpetuation of blight in the area. Whenever possible, the designated property will be acquired through negotiation with current owners. The property will be acquired through standard Community Redevelopment Agency procedures. In those instances where negotiation does not result in a mutually satisfactory agreement, the properties may be acquired by eminent domain proceedings and just compensation awarded in accordance with Chapter 170, Florida Statutes. Areas for potential land acquisition and relocation (if necessary) are indicated in the component sections of this plan. When necessary, as plans are further specified in Phase I (2001-2005) particular parcels will be identified for acquisition where applicable. Such plans will be subject to approval by the CRA Board. The following provides the policies which would govern acquisition, disposition, or relocation activities. 7 9 A Land Acquisition Plan and Program A land acquisition program will be designed to meet the goals and objectives of the redevelopment plan, while minimizing disruption of the neighborhood fabric to be retained and reinforced and minimizing acquisition costs. A land acquisition program could consist of the following components: • Right of Way Acquisition • Commercial Project Acquisitions • Residential Acquisitions for Major Projects • Residential Acquisitions for Infill Demolition, Site Preparation and Public Improvement The County and the CRA may each demolish, clear or move buildings, structures and other improvements from real property in the redevelopment area which it has acquired and as may be necessary to carry out the purpose of this plan. In addition, the County and /or the CRA may construct or cause to be constructed streets, sidewalks, curbs, utilities, lighting, open space, plazas, landscaping, water elements, and other amenities deemed necessary to implement this plan. The County and CRA may change portions of the redevelopment area to be devoted to public uses, public improvements, and infrastructure. Disposition Policy The CRA is authorized under the Act to sell, lease, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any interest in real property. To the extent permitted by law, the CRA is authorized to dispose of Real Property by negotiated sale or lease. All real property acquired by the CRA in the redevelopment area shall be sold or leased for development for the fair value to further the purpose of this plan and as determined pursuant to 163.380 (2), Florida Statute ( 2018). The CRA may reserve such powers and controls through disposition and development document with the purchasers or lessees of real property from the CRA as may be necessary to ensure that development begins within a reasonable period of time and that such development is carried out pursuant to the purpose of this plan. Interested developers will submit proposals in accordance with Section 163.380, Florida Statues. Selected developers will be required to execute binding disposition agreements with the CRA which will safeguard that the provisions of this plan be implemented. The property may be transferred for fair value subject to the disposition agreement and other conditions or covenants necessary to ensure that the purpose of redevelopment will be effectuated. The disposition of all publicly owned or assembled land will be subject to objective and clearly defined standards and procedures which will assure timely re-uses and improvements to property in accordance with the plan and its development controls. Guidelines may include but are not limited the following activities: • Site Re-Use Guidelines • Preferred Redeveloper Designation • Competitive Private Developer Selection • Terms of Property Conveyance 8 9 A • Development Controls and Design Review • Residential Relocation • Commercial Relocation The CRA's Relocation Procedures are described in Section 6 of this Plan. Section 1.6 Duration, Modification and Severability of the Plan The 2000 plan was approved with a 30-year time frame. From time to time during the term of this plan, the CRA may amend or modify this Plan. The provisions of this Plan are severable, and it is the intention of the County and the CRA to confer the whole or any part of the powers, goals, objectives and actions herein provided for and if any of the provisions of this Plan or any action implementing any provisions of this Plan shall be held unconstitutional, invalid or void by any court of competent jurisdiction, the decisions of said court shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions of this Plan. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the County and the CRA that this Plan would have been adopted and implemented had such unconstitutional, invalid or void provision or action not been included herein. 9 9 A Section 2 FINANCIAL PLAN A viable financing program for redevelopment requires a strong commitment from the public and private sector. The key to implementation the public actions called for in this plan is attracting private market investment and the additional ad valorem tax revenue it produces. To carry out redevelopment, the CRA will use all available sources of funding from local, state and federal government and the private sector. It should be noted that the following Financial Plan is intended as a guide for funding redevelopment activities in the Redevelopment Area. Flexibility is essential. The timing, cost and tax revenue impact of private investment is, at best, a projection based upon existing knowledge. Interest rates, construction costs, and national economic conditions will vary and cause revisions in investment decisions. Section 2.1 Funding Sources Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area will require a substantial financial investment on the part of the Community Redevelopment Agency. As provided for under the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, the principal source of funding for the Redevelopment Agency will be through the mechanism of Tax Increment Financing. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) realizes the incremental increase in property tax revenues resulting from redevelopment and uses it to pay for public improvements needed to support and encourage new development. TIF is designed to allow local government to finance, over a term of years, front-end costs involved in the redevelopment of blighted areas. By using this tool a local government can develop and adopt a redevelopment plan, repave or reroute streets, provide other public improvements and open space, provide housing, provide redevelopment assistance or incentives and acquire property within the redevelopment area for redevelopment. Eligible activities, under current law, include but are not limited to, the acquisition of land and improvements, relocation of displaced residents, demolition of deteriorated structures, site preparation, infrastructure improvements plus housing and commercial development and other activities implementing this plan. Use of Tax Increment Revenues Under Florida legislation, increment revenues can be used for the following purposes when directly related to redevelopment: $ Administrative and overhead expenses incidental to a redevelopment plan. $ Redevelopment planning and analysis. $ Acquisition of real property in the redevelopment area. $ Clearance and preparation of redevelopment sites, and relocation costs. $ Repayment of indebtedness and payment of expenses incidental to indebtedness. $ Development of affordable housing within the redevelopment area. $ Development of community policing innovations. $ Construction streets, utilities, parks, public areas, parking garages, and other improvements necessary to carrying out the redevelopment plan. 10 9 A The greatest single source of funding for the Community Redevelopment Agency will come from tax increment revenues determined by growth in certain real property tax revenues within the Redevelopment Area. For the purpose of calculating the amount of tax increment revenues the frozen tax base is the final 1999 tax roll. Projected tax increment revenues for each component area is included in the Component sections of this Plan. Section 2.2 Other Funding Sources To make the most effective use of Tax Increment Revenues, the CRA and the County will use other County, State and Federal funding sources as appropriate and available to carry out the provisions of this plan. The Financial Plan assume that funds for the public expenditures identified in the Redevelopment Plan will be obtained from several sources in addition to Tax Increment Financing. Advances and Loans The Community Redevelopment Agency shall have the power to borrow money and accept advances from any source, public or private, including the County for any lawful purpose in connection with the redevelopment program. Tax Increment Revenues or any other funds deposited into the Redevelopment Trust Fund, which are not otherwise obligated shall be available for repayment of such loans or advances. Tax Increment Revenue Bonds When authorized by the Board of County Commissioners, the CRA may issue redevelopment revenue bonds, notes or other obligations to finance the undertaking of any community redevelopment project activity, including the payment of principal and interest upon any loans and retirement of bonds or other obligations previously issued. The security for such bonds may be based upon the anticipated tax increment revenues and such other revenues as may be legally available. Grants The Community Redevelopment Agency may apply for local, state or federal grants that may be applicable to implementation of the redevelopment goals outlined in this Plan. Tax Increment revenues may be used to match grant dollars if necessary. 11 9 A Section 3 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT ELEMENT Since the redevelopment area contains low- and moderate-income housing, Section 163.362(3) Florida Statutes requires that the redevelopment plan contain a neighborhood impact element which... describe in detail the impact of the redevelopment upon the residents of the redevelopment area and the surrounding area in terms of relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilities and services, effect on school population, and other matters affecting the physical and social quality of the neighborhood. The structure of the Redevelopment Plan was specifically organized to minimize housing and residential neighborhood impacts while emphasizing neighborhood enhancement, particularly in those areas containing affordable housing stock. The intensive redevelopment activities recommended in the plan concentrate on existing commercial and semi-industrial areas. Each component section contains a Neighborhood Impact Element. 12 9 A ! "` Section 4 COMPONENT SECTION-IMMOKALEE REDEVLOl'MENT AREA PLAN W }1 :rY ;fI fir.„ I J}',St C i. l'' f ;.+ ii, {fp�;'El \n t J�ISa}, y ky,r �'rt j,(. y i i'0'eM l 3 k�St J 1 'y ,{ • C i 8 xl '64. 4 4 4 t b y6 ,r am rll r S• ki S • a , i' Y^x 2,f"„z' rixa.u"" '' :''Z'l'J xa Y l p s+ I yro' ' SJ" i.'''ra'r;''','4,,r' µ SS ,' ,li s 1a t s d x fi - + ., • z ~c Y � ti v xw s x-l 4 r :(,$• J.L '"i y:✓�"yc ,•{.1, dz fx-, n r iJ i.,,,,y{J^ A a t t+,J,, i" _r r ' t r{ /}�„�7Ei Ir*t f Y Y ' ' M'' � '',,,,l', i 1. e ,kf' }.t, F, : •r. 4 ;.t: '� f :i .„. + 4, f 7aa f(er 4 1� F u r',,'' fin'i ,t X ii 1" '114, ::,,f v;;;aIf'''.7r+ fly yf 1 ,.1, [r �,..- a w � +'s."i'�,�;rcS.t�lf€�Y Pd,�'.. �1$�ci"+,il'. y. S f ' ,. , ,, i„Jr,. , .., „, , , ,;., .,. „..-,._ . ,. , . .;, :t.. �' T !:T� l'r'xiR er 1 E a. ! J �PA�.+, - .1, .' X.1. ,i *ti Pr J,�'' ti4+n y/ 1 tJ dt - t J'M,4xr i i z ;-.'w. l F ?'7.7 r tr -, ha�`f si t F J I 1 t J T J t + A • , _ gJ1 s y S J ,. x sS.'s 1' 9,', sy •' t t +, . .R ilk dt rai'i a • s ' J , if}!k r�Ik + . - � 4at ,�Hnh4di P w t • .. COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1,-,'`— 9A .• Section 4.1 Introduction • The lmmokalee Redevelopment Area Plan has been formulated in close cooperation with the people of Immokalee and is based on the objectives identified by'community members in a series of public workshops. This area plan is a guide for the physical and economic revitalization and enhancement of the Immokalee Community. This area plan capitalizes on the existing Main Street project, the federal Enterprise Community designation, the Regional Airport Industrial Park and Lake Trafford to create a • catalyst for revitalizing the community and improving the housing stock. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed boundaries for the redevelopment area. _ Immokalee has long been considered isolated from the coastal county both in location and demographics. Immokalee's development is based on its agriculture resources,, which resulted in Immokalee becoming the leading producer of winter vegetables in the United States. However, as the economics of agriculture changed the social problems associated with low wages, an unskilled labor force, and a transient multi-cultural population grew. One of the results has been a lack of reinvestment into the area. • The economy of rural Southwest Florida has been and continues to be based primarily on agriculture, which has not kept pace with job growth throughout the state of Florida. Rural Florida continues to have lower earned income, higher unemployment, lower property values and fewer opportunities for employment. Regionally, the major economic contributors are retirement, tourism, construction, agriculture and the environment. Although tourism has a major impact on the regional urban economy, the lmmokalee Community has yet to reap the benefits. The Immokalee Community was designated as a Federal Champion Community in 1994, a Florida Main Street area in 1996, and a Federal Enterprise Community in 1999. During the application process for the • Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community grant a series of community meetings were held with several hundred community residents attending. Based on the community input and the consensus reached at these meetings a Strategic Plan was written, The Plan identifies four areas of concern: 1. Accessibility and Appropriateness of Education and Training 2. Diversification of the economic base and availability of higher wage jobs 3. The availability of decent and affordable housing 4, Community Image and pride The Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan incorporates the goals and strategies identified in the Enterprise Strategic Plan as the basis for the redevelopment plan. • • 13 9 A . , r ,- „ N N CI r , r N N M 0 ._.....f _.._........ ....... —_ __._ U —.�.... W N r N N M N r tom- N N N O N N 3Or N _ i NN , ir r r 4 M t COto N gVI i a, ea N N r O N O Lfl co N N r, If O N °O • O CD Ps atQ .:� •♦ N- CO M M • N in N • A P v't CD N N M ry _. -..-._.... . — __ r.-. . ... .. . fir_.._ T� N r ...- N N f t bT r H N M r Q , } J I1 i .�{{ Q ) O r N `+"� ems+ N N M r = a --- Y T. _ N mO 1 ;r42/ r cn I W J NBZ US LS Hhly, r QQ�]] SAL P 0 W — — --Ip �QLL ILI CD CO CD 1 O r r r N N i--I1~ 11 t�� , r N N CO U 2 H r111 Nin n4 rN m N N M Y m �'_ M Q 0 'n.. t N N 1N•1 co JI r CO r N �l E M m ' ;,. { N r Fj l 0 uO r I M .... �/ CO COr ,.:N 14 9 A • • • Section 4.2 FINDINGS.AND CONDITIONS OF BLIGHT • Blighted Area Cas defined in Section 163,340 (8), Florida Statutes' means either: • (a) An area in which there are a substantial number of slum, deteriorated or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following • factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: • 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; The Immokalee Redevelopment Area is characterized by a defective or inadequate street layout. Most Immokalee residents walk or bicycle to work, school and shopping. Few adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities are available throughout the Immokalee study area. Problems include: Inadequate street layout and design Lack of shoulders and guardrails along streets adjacent to deep and wide drainage swales Poor access to Commercial and Industrial parking and access problems Few sidewalks available for a predominately pedestrian population A general lack of neighborhood connections to each other The major arterial roadways are State Road 29, Immokalee Road and New Market Road (SR 29A). State Road 29 is a two-lane facility that widens to four lanes through the small downtown area. The four-lane segment is called Main Street and is the focus of redevelopment and 'economic revitalization. it is the only segment with on-street parking and sidewalks on both sides. The two lane segments of State Road 29 north and east of Main Street are two lanes with no sidewalks. _ New Market Road is a two-lane facility with 100 feet of right-of-way and no sidewalks, paved shoulders, or turn lanes. -The remaining right-of-way and truck parking is limestone. Vegetable and fruit packing houses and the State Farmers Market are located along this street. Trucks are encouraged to use this street as a bypass road to avoid the downtown area and to pick up goods for transport. The roadway is in poor condition and maintenance costs are high due to damage by trucks dragging limestone on roadway. Although many people walk or bicycle to work in this area, pathway facilities are unavailable. Immokalee Road intersects with SR 29 at the beginning of Main .Street. North of Main Street it narrows to two lanes and has a sidewalk on the west side only. Major problems exist along many of the local roads. There are few sidewalks. Typical local street widths are less than twenty feet required in the Collier County Land Development Code and open stormwater systems are adjacent to roadways without paved shoulders or guardrails. For example, south of State Road 29, along 91h Street, there are deep, wide drainage ditches on both sides of the • roadway, There are no sidewalks and no guardrails to safeguard pedestrians and motorists. The roadway width is eighteen feet and there are not enough rights of way to construct pathway facilities without converting the open swales to a covered stormwater system. • • 15 9 A • • • In addition, many residential neighborhoods are not linked to one another and most of the commercial areas are not linked to one another. The Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park lack adequate water and sewer service and stormwater management facilities to sufficiently handle the projected future development. County Road 846 that leads to Alrpark Blvd. is a two-lane facility with narrow lanes and no paved shoulders. This facility does not adequately address the projected increase in truck traffic due to the future development of the airport and industrial park. 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness: The majority of commercial lots are zoned General Commercial District(C-4) or Heavy Commercial District (C-5). In the C-4 and C-5 zoning district a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet, with a width of 100 feet for commercial development is required. Many of the commercial lots in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for commercial development. Some do not meet either of the lot width or lot square footage requirements, . Existing buildings are frequently non- conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, setbacks, and buffers. The RMF6 zoning district has a minimum requirement of 6500 square feet with a width of 60 feet for a single family development; 12,000 square feet with a width of 80 feet for a two-family development; and 5,500 square feet per unit with a width of 100 feet for a three or more family residential development. The majority of lots are non-conforming and rebuilding on these lots may require the owner to seek a variance from the development standards. In the South Immokalee area over 50% of the platted lots are non-conforming. The majority of these lots are zoned C-4 or RMF-6. A majority of the mobile home parks in the Immokalee community were developed in the 1970's and do not meet the minimum standards and permitted densities. The • Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a width of 60 feet for residential-development in the VR and MH zoning districts. It is common in the Immokalee Community to have intensive commercial uses located adjacent to residential uses without adequate buffering between the uses. 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions: According to 1990 Census Data, 1.2 percent of Immokalee' area households lack complete plumbing for exclusive use. In the entire county, this figure is 0.2 percent. In occupied housing units in Immokalee according to the 1990 U.S. Census, 6.8 percent of the owner occupied units and 16 percent of the renter occupied units had more than 1.51 or more persons per room. This figure is .03 for the entire County reflecting a greater degree of overcrowding in the Immokalee area. • Based on the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study, there were a total of 4,957 housing units of those 1,282 or 26% are in need"of rehabilitation. In the Immokalee study area, 19 unsafe buildings and 4 non-secure structures were identified from January 1998 to February 2000. Sidewalks are almost entirely absent from the redevelopment area. • •16 • • 9 A There is a lack of street lighting in the most Of the residential neighborhoods. Wide and deep open swales are present in the South Immokalee neighborhoods, They accumulate stagnate water and trash. The disposal of garbage in the Immokalee area is a problem. Lack of adequate dumpsters for the mobile home parks and commercial establishment's results in a serious litter problem. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District covers approximately 27 square miles and most of the Urban area of Immokalee. However, the geographic area served by the district is considerably smaller. Additional treatment plants and distribution lines will be needed to serve the entire community. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District is under a consent order from the Department of Environmental Protection due to insufficient handling of their effluent. The spray fields are inadequate. No new sewer hook-ups can be permitted unless the District can show.a reduction of flow to the system. There are a few separate collection systems that were permitted prior to the creation of the district. Those systems need to be upgraded and included within the district's authority. An example is the Baker Street area, which is on a separate collection system. There have been three reported failures since 1997 where raw sewage was deposited on the ground. 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements: Surface water management problems are present within the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the roads are unpaved and poorly drained. In South Immokalee where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide. 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land: For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area. For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities or roadways, bridges or public transportation facilities incapable of handling'the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The residential neighborhoods lack connection to one another. In a primarily pedestrian community, there is a lack of an integrated sidewalk system connecting residential areas with commercial establishments. There is no public transportation system. The commercial lots along Main Street and First Street lack adequate parking facilities. • 4l 17 • 9A . New Market Road does not adequately address the needs of the semi-trucks and trailers that transport the farm products out of the area. Heavy truck traffic on local streets intrudes residential neighborhoods and has had a negative impact on commercial redevelopment activities. SR 29 does not provide the number of lanes needed to adequately serve the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park, Housing Affordability [as defined in Section 163,355 (8) F.S.1 means: An area in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly. A housing unit is considered affordable if the monthly payments do not exceed 35 percent of the monthly income for principal, interests, taxes, and insurance. According to the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study 36 percent of the households with a mortgage and 40 percent of renter occupied households pay more . than 35 percent of their income for housing. According to the study of those persons making less than $10,000, 72 percent pay more than 35 percent of their income to rent. The median household income in 1990 according to the U.S. Census Bureau was $15,170. Forty-five percent of the population in Immokalee is below the poverty level. The population growth, as well as high seasonal farm labor population, has produced a critical demand for housing according to the 1999 Empowerment Alliance of Southwest Florida Strategic Plan. There is a shortage of low and moderate income housing in the Immokalee Community CONCLUSION OF FINDINGS OF BLIGHT It is the conclusion of this study that the Immokalee study area clearly has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout,faulty lot layout, unsafe or unsanitary conditions, and deterioration of a site or other improvements as set forth in Chapter 163 for designation as a blighted area and that rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of the Immokalee study area is necessary and advisable in the furtherance of the public interest of residents of Collier County. • • 18 9A • Section 4.3 CONSISTENCY WITH THE COLLER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN Policy 4.2'of the Collier County Growth Management Plan supports redevelopment efforts in lmmokalee as stated below: Policy 4.2 • A detailed Master Plan for the lmmokalee has been developed and was incorporated into this Growth Management Plan in February, 1991. The Master Plan addresses Natural Resources, Future Land Use, Public Facilities, Housing , Urban Design, Land Development Regulations and other considerations. Major purposes of the Master Plan shall be coordination of land use and transportation planning, redevelopment or renewal of blighted areas and elimination of land uses inconsistent with the community's character. The Immokalee Redevelopment Area mirrors the area included in the Immokalee area Master Plan. The lmmokalee Area Master Plari (LAMP) was adopted by the Board of County in 1991 as a separate element of the Growth Management Plan due to the unique character of Irrimokalee. A separate Future Land Use Map was also adoptedfor Immokalee and is presented'in Figure 3 , The land uses available in the Immokalee area listed below. Some inconsistencies with allowable residential density and land use exist where areas where platted years ago or mobile home parks were allowed to accommodate the large migrant population. There are several situations where residential is interspersed among commercial and industrial uses, The Planning-Services Department is currently conducting an analysis of the mobile home parks'and will be recommending amendments to the IMAP to accommodate existing mobile home parks that are not consistent with the IMAP. The following section describes land use designations.shown on the lmmokalee Master Plan Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Residential Designation This designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential land uses including single-family, duplexes, multi-family, and mobile homes, which does not preclude seasonal, temporary and migrant farm worker housing. 1. Low Residential District The.purpose of this designation is to provide for a low-density residential district. Residential dwellings shall be limited to single-farnily structures and duplexes. Multi-family dwellings shall be permitted provided they are within a Planned Unit Development. Mobile home development shall be permitted in the form of mobile home sub-divisions or parks and as a mobile home overlay as defined by the Land Development Code. A density less than or equal to four (4) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted. 2. Mixed Residential District The purpose of this designation is to provide for a mixture of housing types within medium density residential areas. Residential dwellings shall include single-family structure, multi-family dwellings, individual mobile homes, and duplexes on a lot by lot basis. A density less than or equal to six (6) dwellings units per gross acre is permitted. 19 9A ' • • • 3. High Residential District • The purpose of this designation is to provide for a district of high-density residential development, Residential dwellings shall be limited to multi-family structures and less intensive units such as single family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. Mobile home developments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisipns or parks as defined in the Land Development Code, A density less than or equal to eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted. 4. Nonresidential Uses • Non-residential uses permitted within the residential designation are limited to those uses that are compatible and/or support the residential character of the area. The allowed uses include: parks, open space and recreational uses, churches, libraries, cemeteries, public and private schools, day-care centers and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code. • Commercial Designation The designation is'intended to accommodate a variety of commercial land uses including neighborhood oriented commercial uses, commerce center uses, general highway commercial and commercial development within Planned Unit Developments. Migrant Labor Camps are also permitted within the Commercial designations. 1. Commercial District The purpose of this designation is to provide for retail, office, transient lodging facilities and highway commercial that serve the needs of the traveling public generally C-1 through C-4 Commercial Zoning Districts as identified in the Land Development Code. These commercial uses must be located on a major arterial or collector roadway. 2. Neighborhood Center District The purpose of this land use classification is to provide for centers of activity that serves the needs of the surrounding neighborhoods. The centers should contain a mix of neighborhood-oriented uses such as day care center, parks, schools, and governmental activities. Other development criteria that shall apply to all neighborhood centers includes the following: a. To achieve a neighborhood character, these centers are encouraged to be anchored by elementary schools, neighborhood scale parks, and/or churches. b. .A center should be limited to 80-120 acres in size, and will serve a population ranging between 5,000 to 7,500 people,or accommodate a service area of one (1) mile radius. c. The Neighborhood Centers should be no closer than one(1) mile. d. Non-residential uses shall be at least 20% of the size of the Neighborhood Center, e. Residential development within the designated Neighborhoods Centers shall permit a maximum density of twelve (12) units per gross acre. Residential dwelling units shall be limited to multi-family structures and less intensive units such as single-family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. Mobile • home developments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as defined in the Land Development Code. • 20 9 A • • f. Commercial development shall be permitted within a Neighborhood Center provided all of the following criteria are met; 1. Commercial uses shall be limited to barber and beauty shops; drug stores; deli; meat market; bicycle services; restaurant; dry cleaning; veterinary clinics; medical offices; laundry facilities; any other convenience commercial uses which is compatible in nature with the,foregoing uses. The Collier County School Board will • be notified of any proposed use to avoid conflict with the nearby schools; and 2. No commercial use shall be permitted within a mile of an existing school property line within a Neighborhood Center; and 3. Access to the commercial development must in no way conflict with the school traffic in the area; and 4. The design of any proposed commercial development must take into consideration the safety of the school children; and 5. The projects within the Neighborhood Centers shall en`bourage provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments; and 6. Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments; and 7. Projects directly abutting residentially zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 50 foot setback and landscape buffer; and 8. Projects shall provide a 10 foot wide landscaped strip between the abutting right-of-way and the off-street parking area. From time to time new Neighborhood Centers may be proposed. No two centers may be closer than one mile from each other. New Neighborhood Centers would require market justification and must meet size, spacing and use criteria expressed earlier. 3. Commerce Center-Mixed Use District The purpose of this designation is to create a major activity center that services the entire lmmokalee Urban Designated Area and surrounding agricultural area, The Mixed-Use District shall function as an employment center and shall encourage commercial and institutional uses. Uses permitted within this Sub-district shall include shopping center, governmental institutions, middle or high school, Community Park and other employment generating uses. Other permitted commercial uses shall include transient lodging facilities at 26 dwelling units per acre. The appropriate zoning districts include C-1 through C-4 as identified in the Land Development Code. In considering new commercial zoning, priority shall be given to protecting existing residential uses. Residential development is permitted within the mixed-use Sub-district at a maximum density of twelve (12) units per gross acre. Residential dwellings shall be limited to multi-family structures and less intensive units such as single-family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. Mobile home developments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as defined in the Land Development Code. • 21 9 .A The mixed-use district will be controlled via a series of performance standards that address issues of buffering, noise, signage, and lighting, architectural compatibility, and lot size, parking and landscaping. 4. Planned Unit Development Commercial District Commercial development shall be permitted within a Planned Unit Development provided the following size and development criteria are met. There are three (3) categories for PUD Commercial. The commercial component within a PUD will be allowed to develop up to the maximum acreage specified in the table below: CATEGORY I CATEGORY II CATEGORY III PUD Acres • 80+ 160+ 300+- Maximum Commercial Acres 5 acres 10 acres 20 acres Permitted Zoning C-2 C-3 C-2, C-3 &C-4 In addition to the above criteria, the following standards must also be met: a. Commercial zoning shall be no closer than one (1) mile to the nearest commerce center and no closer than one mile from the nearest PUD commercial toning of ten acres or greater in size; b. The configuration of the commercial parcel shall be no more frontage than depth unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners; C. Commercial zoning or development shall be no closer than a '/4 mile from the nearest existing elementary school boundary; and d. No construction in the commercial designated area shall be allowed until 30% of the project has commenced construction unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. Non-commercial Uses In addition to those mixed-uses permitted within the Commercial Designations, uses such as parks, open space and recreational uses, churches, libraries, cemeteries, public and private schools, day-care centers and those essential services as defined in the Land Development Code are permitted. 5. Residential/Tourist District The purpose of this District is to provide centers for recreational and tourism activity that utilizes the natural environment as the main attraction. The centers should contain low Intensity uses that attract tourists and residents while preserving the environmental features of the area. Uses permitted in this district include, passive parks, nature preserves; wildlife sanctuaries; open space; museums; cultural facilities; marinas; transient lodging facilities including: hotel/motel,,rental cabins, bed & breakfast establishments, campsites, restaurants; recreational vehicles; sporting and recreational camps; low- intensity retail; single family homes; agriculture; and those essential services as defined in the Land Development Code. Residential development is permitted at a density of less than or equal to four(4) dwelling units per gross acre. Transient lodging is permitted at a maximum density of eight (8) units per acre. Rezones are 22 9 k • • encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUB). The minimum acreage requirement for a PUD shall be two (2) contiguous acres. Industrial Designation This designation is intended to accommodate a variety of industrial [and uses such as Industrial, Commerce Center- Industrial, and Business Parks. 1. Industrial District The purpose of this designation is to provide industrial type uses including those uses related to light • manufacturing, processing, storage and warehousing, wholesaling, distribution, packing houses, recycling, high technology, laboratories, assembly, storage, computer and data processing, business services, limit commercial such as child care centers, and restaurants and other basic industrial uses but not including retail, as described in the Land Development Code for the Industrial and Business Park Zoning Districts. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district, including offices, retail sales, and structures which are customarily accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to permitted principal uses and structures are also permitted 2. Commerce Center -industrial District The purpose of this designation is to create a major Activity Center that serves the entire lmmokalee Urban Designated Area and surrounding agricultural area. The industrial District shall function as an employment center and shall encourage industrial and commercial uses as described in the Land Development Code for the Commercial (C-1 through C-5), Industrial and Business Park Zoning Districts. Higher intensity commercial uses including packing houses, industrial fabricatioh operation and warehouses shall be permitted within this District. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district, including offices, retail sales, and structures which are customarily accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to permitted principal uses and structures are also permitted. 3. Business Park District Business Parks are intended to include a mix of industrial uses and offices designed in an attractive park-like environment with low structural density where building coverage ranges between 25% to 45% and where large landscaped areas provide for buffering and enjoyment by the employees and patrons of the Park. Business Parks shall comply with the following: a. Business Parks shall be permitted to develop with a maximum of 40% commercial uses, of the type identified in "c" below, to reserve land within the industrially designated areas for the intended industrial uses and to ensure compatibility. b." Access to arterial road systems shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Management Policy and consistent with Objective 7 and Policy 7.1 of the Traffic Circulation Element. c. Commercial uses shall include, and shall be limited to, uses such as offices, financial institutions, cultural facilities, and fitness centers/facilities, and shall only be permitted within those areas zoned Business Park or Planned Unit Development within the industrial Designation. . d. Business Parks must be a minimum of 35 acres in size. The Planned Unit Development and/or rezoning ordinance document for Business Park projects shall contain specific language regarding the permitted non-industrial.uses and development characteristic guidelines consistent with those stated above. Non-Industrial Uses In addition to those industrial uses permitted within the Industrial Designation, uses such as those essential services as defined in the Land Development Code are permitted. • 23 f A 1� . • r • • • • • • • • • • / Y/ W + i • • • • • • • • + • • .), yyy7 IX • • • • • f • —�, W 6• y W♦A� 8 g 9 • • • • . J I 9 _gG yq gg ild 1 e 4@ pYi(k ): . , -- d rf z..U., 4. 5 7 7, !r. w N w,.- 1.11 i .(/' • go 8 o • wok Amike Z 10 f / We ._i._.•- J J , * II♦�!I et*V4 4Acri 1 „Ale III Ill 17.1000tvoiL.,...m%x ,, ,f, ru 3 #0•''' ,N,Nozgrel ‘7,...,. , e •*Ad." I .. * • 4 • \ 7-- immirdiaogs0 jam W ir Q MI , 0 � - 2 ig • • i C i • 9 ) i V • o • • . • • • ir I • • • . f • f • • > • s f s • • • s s . i .611 f ! Gill ♦ + + • • • i i • f i • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ •CO ♦ 1 • •♦ * i f ♦ • . ♦ • ♦ • f 9 g N ♦ . ♦ • i • . • ♦ ♦ • ♦ • • . g R Ag re. a * ♦ • . • • • + . ♦ • • • . • v 3 N 8 3a 3ii • f i i • • • f • • • s • • i © Sa¢y p • • • • • • • • ♦ ♦ • • • • • • 8 I S 9V 1 1 24 s Lb 1 • 9. A ' The TAMP, in addition to the general intent of the land use categories, the 1AMP specifies a number of developments and redevelopment oriented goals, objectives, and policies, which directly or indirectly relate to the redevelopment of the area. The objectives that are applicable are listed below: Objective 11.2: By2005, improve the physical appearance of the commercial building stock by 10% in the Main Street Program area. The CRA Plan is specifically designed to achieve the intent this objective in TAMP. Designation as ' Florida Main Street laid the foundation for a Community Redevelopment program in this community. The Main Street Program area is targeted for Phase 1 improvements. • OBJECTIVE 11.3: Encourage innovative approaches in urban and project design, which enhance both the environment and the visual appeal of Immokalee, OBJECTIVE 11.4: Provide land use designations, criteria and zoning that recognize the needs of that significant portion of immokalee's population,which is primarily pedestrian in nature. • The Immokalee Overlay District has been adopted in the Collier County Land Development Code. The overlay is currently divided into six sub-districts, The purpose of this overlay district is to establish criteria suitable for the unique land use needs of the Immokalee Community. This plan supports the continued development of criteria in each sub-district to encourage redevelopment in the areas identified. The plan further acknowledges the need to provide design and flexible development standards in Immokalee OBJECTIVE III. 1: Collier County shall promote the conservation and rehabilitation of housing in Immokalee neighborhoods. OBJECTIVE 111,2: Collier County will respond to the housing needs identified in the housing study of Immokalee by county initiatives, which will reduce the cost of housing development for low and very low-income households, OBJECTIVE: 111.3 By January 1998 the County will have in place a pilot plan of innovative programs and regulatory reforms to reduce the costs of development and maintenance of safe, healthful, and affordable housing for low and very low income households in Immokalee. The Immokalee Redevelopment area plan proposes a comprehensive approach to encouraging the replacement of mobile homes; revitalization of existing housing stock; the provision of home ownership opportunities; and encouraging infill development to strengthen viability of existing neighborhoods. Goal VI and its related objectives and policies provide the framework for the connection of transportation issues and commercial revitalization. The interconnection of bike paths and sidewalks is included in the redevelopment plan for Phase I funding. The development of a loop road is identified in Phase II funding as well. This loop will have a positive impact on improving the Main Street area as well as improving truck movements through the town. t:i 25' A GOAL VI: The Future land use pattern shall be supported by a network of roads, pedestrian ways, and bikeways that maintains Immokalee's small-town character, yet achieves efficient and safe traffic movement. Objective VI.1: The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, motorized and non- motorized vehicles. Goal VIII and related policies addresses one of the main objectives of the redevelopment area plan to improve the economic conditions of the area be encouraging new development and redevelopment. The redevelopment area plan specifically addresses the development of the immokalee Regional Airport and the industrial park. The recruitment of new industrial and warehousing uses to the Industrial Park are strongly encouraged. The plan proposes to provide assistanceto recruit new businesses to the Airport through assistance in the permitting process, and economic assistance. In addition, the plan recognizes the need to increase code enforcement and sheriff patrols in the area, Goal VIII: Enhance and diversify the local economy of the Immokalee Community Policy VIII.1.2: The Community Development and Environmental Services Division and the Airport Authority shall promote the development of the Immokalee Airport and surrounding commercial and industrial areas as set forth in the Immokalee Airport Master Plan. Policy VIII.1.3: Develop and initiate a program in 1997 to promote the incentives ofEnterprise Zone designation. . Policy VII1.1.4: The Community Development and Environmental Services Division will coordinate with the Collier County Sheriff's Department on investigating and pursuing any funding opportunities available under the Safe Neighborhood Act to assist with enhancing the Immokalee community. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles shall be encouraged in all development standards. Section 4.4 COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES The Immokalee Community has a long history of community pride and activity. The first permanent settlers in Immokalee were recorded in 1872. The community received its current name"immokalee" meaning "my home (in Seminole) in 1897 with the naming of the first post office. Lacking sufficient transportation to other commerce centers immokalee remained isolated from the coastal towns and developed as an agricultural hub. Immokalee became the leading produce of winter vegetables in the United States. Due to the agricultural employment opportunities, the area has become ethnically mixed, as farm workers from Haiti,.Guatemala, and Mexico have made this area their home. Its ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity pose significant challenges since different groups often have different values, priorities, and even aesthetics. The cynical nature of agriculture creates major challenges in many aspects of the community including housing, workforce skills, economic pressures from increased global competition and weather conditions. Nevertheless, the residents of this rural community have worked together to meet their challenges. In 1994, the community came together to prepare a grant application for the first round of the Federal Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community Initiative. A strategic Plan was written based on community • 26 • 9 A • input. Unfortunately, the community did notget selected as an Empowerment Zone or Enterprise Community. However, the work that went into the planning process was not forgotten. In 1996, the community applied for, and received, designation as a Florida Main Street area. This program was very successful in bringing technical resources to the community and provided direction on how to move forward on a long awaited goal to improve the physical condition of the downtown area. This group was instrumental in_preparing for the second round of Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community grants that were announced by the Federal government in 1998, Five community meetings were held, each with • over 100 participants. The Strategic Plan that was developed through this community process is the basis of the Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan. An Immokalee Community Redevelopment Advisory Committee will be appointed following plan adoption to monitor the implementation of the redevelopment area plan. There are four main areas of concern identified by the community. The goals and objectives are listed below: Economic Development Goal • Diversify the economic base of the community by focusing on agricultural production, processing and research; industrial development including manufacturing, distribution and aviation services; and nature tourism. Objective: Increase Small Business Start-Ups And Expansions • Objective: Develop Nature Tourism Objective: Recruit New Businesses To Immokalee And Airport Objective: Nurture Entrepreneurial Business Development and Retention Objective: Expand Research Opportunities in the Health Care Industry Objective: Encourage renovation of structures and infill development in the Main Street Program Area. Objective: Increase public transportation opportunities through the community and to outlining areas. Objective: Develop a loop road to serve the truck traffic Housing Goal To Provide Safe,Affordable Housing To All Zone Residents • Objective: - Ensure That Land Is Available At Or Below Market Rate To Build Affordable Housing. Objective: Develop a Public/Private Housing Initiative For New Construction For Both Ownership And Rental For Low, Very Low And Moderate Priced Housing. Objective: Improve the Condition of Owner-Occupied Homes through Rehabilitation and Eliminate Substandard Housing Through Code Enforcement Activities. Objective: Improve the condition_of Rental-occupied housing through rehabilitation and code enforcement activities. Objective: Create incentives to replace existing mobile homes with upgraded mobile or manufactured homes, Community Image Goal . To-Enhance The Image And The Perception Of The Community As A Safe, Friendly, Family Oriented Small Town. Objective: Maximize Current Recreational Activities. Objective: Create Recreation/Cultural Opportunities In Cooperation With Business, Existing Youth Development Programs, And Schools, Objective: Develop Cadre Of Volunteers To Serve the community Objective: Create Community Based And Neighborhood Based Beautification Projects. 27 9 A • • Objective: Increase The Number Of Cultural Activities To Celebrate Community Spirit. Objective: Create an incentive program for litter Control And Neighborhood Cleanups. Objective: Create a Code Enforcement Program that is not complaint driven. • Objective: Increase Community Policing activities in the community. Objective: Provide safe and convenient movement of pedestrians throughout the community Objective: Develop a program to improve dirt lots in the Main Street area that will eliminate the dust and dirt that accumulates in the downtown area. Section 4.5 REDEVELOPMENT AREA CHARACTERISTICS AND ANAYSIS • The following provides an analysis of the existing conditions of the Immokalee Redevelopment area. Figure_provides a map of the proposed redevelopment area boundaries. A diagram of the existing conditions is provided in the form of a large fold-out map contained in the Appendix B of this document. The map indicates current, oning, parcel lines, parks, schools, public facilities, and streets. No change is proposed to existing public open space in the Immokalee Community. Redevelopment Area Characteristics Located in northeastern Collier County, the Immokalee Community is located approximately 45 miles from the County seat of Naples. This rural un-incorported area is primarily agricultural. There is one major roadway-- Immokalee Road or CR 846-into the community from Naples. State Road 29 provides access into the Community from the northern counties of Lee and Hendry. Although there are approximately 16,764 acres of land within the redevelopment area, 60% is currently in agricultural use. The remaining land is a mixture of residential, commercial and industrial uses. The estimated 1998 permanent population of Immokalee is 17,806. However,:the population nearly doubles during the winter months due to the agricultural industry. This increase occurs when the harvest season for vegetables and citrus is at its peak. The 1998 projected peak season population for Immokalee is 32,929. The Immokalee population is considerably different from Collier County as a whole. The 1990 median age in Immokalee is estimated at 21 while the Collier County median age is estimated at 41. In 1990, 65% of Immokalee's population was of Hispanic Origin, which may be of any race, in comparison to 8% of the remainder of Collier County's population being of Hispanic Origin. The 1990 Household Median Income in Immokatee.was $15,170 in comparison to Collier County's median household income of$34,001. According to the 1990 U.S. Census 45% of the population was below poverty level. • Housing Stock There were 5,166 units reported by the Bureau of the U.S. Census in 1990, only 18% were vacant. Within the total number of units occupied in Immokalee the average person per household rate for owner occupied units is 3.86 and the rate for renter occupied units is 3.57. The number of mobile homes/trailers reported by the 1990 Census is 1805. According to the Census the bulk of housing was constructed between 1970 to 1988. Seven percent of the existing housing stock was built prior to 1960. • The 1994.1rnrnokalee Housing Study reported 1,282 housing units in need of rehabilitation or demolition. Sixty percent of the units in need of rehabilitation were mobile homes. • A large portion of the housing stock is used to house the migrant farm population. Overcrowding and deteriorated structures have been sited by the.Florida Health Department that monitors migrant camps. 28 • A The dwelling units are primarily cinder block homes with some,wood framed houses built by Habitat for Humanity. There are several multi-family apartment complexes. • Commercial Stock South Immokalee consists of older small commercial buildings. The Main Street Corridor has few vacant structures, some of which are in need of rehabilitation or demolition. Newer commercial development has occurred along SR29. This new development is primarily strip highway commercial. , The Plan identifies developing specific standards for this corridor as part of the Immokalee Overlay District. New Market Road is a mixture of industrial packinghouse facilities and small older commercial building:This area is also scheduled to have an Overlay developed to meet the specific needs of this commerce center. Employment Opportunities Most of the County's agricultural production occurs in and around Immokalee. The largest employment sector is in agricultural. Individuals working on farms are substantially below those working in other jobs. In 1986, the average weekly wage of a person working in agriculture was $102 as compared-to those in the retail trade sector that earned an average of weekly wage of$209. A large number of the residents of Immokalee travel to Naples to work in the service, construction or landscape industry. The majority of professional people who are employed in Immokalee live outside of the area. In 1996, the five largest employers in Immokalee are: Collier County Schools(1,089); Six-L's Packing (600); Seminole Indian Casino(306); Marion E. Fether Medical Clinic(170) and N.T. Gargiulo (98), • • --- There are a large number of small retail establishments scattered throughout the community to serve the migrant population who are primarily pedestrians. • Land Use Characteristics=General Existing South Immokaee The South Immokalee area is approximately 300 acres with 77% of it developed. It is a primarily a mixture of residential land uses containing 81% of the land area, There is a concentration of mobile homes located west of South 1st Street and East of South 9th Street. The remaining area is commercial with 17% and industrial with one percent. The residential uses located west of South 1st street are. considered non-conforming uses. There is a small percentage of commercial development in the residentially zoned area. These uses are also considered non-conforming. The majority of lots within this area are non-conforming as well. Rebuilding on these properties may require the property owner to seek a variance from the development standards of the zoning district or to aggregate property to meet the regulations. The majority of buildings in this area where in built in the 1970's. The highest concentration of criminal activity in the community takes place in this area. There are few streetlights and few internal sidewalks. Large open swales exist along the neighborhood streets. The Neighborhood Park located in this area provides minimal recreational opportunities. Main Street Program Area • The Main Street area is anchored by the Seminole Indian Casino at the/South end of town and the historic Roberts Ranch site on the west end of Main Street. The Main Street Boundaries include the land adjacent to CR846 (First Street) and SR29 (Main Street) . It is primarily commercial property that has been under utilized. The main intersection (First and Main Street) has two prime commercial corners vacant. Older residential and mobile homes are found abutting commercial development with little or no buffering. Commercial zoning along with a mixture of mobile home, older single family and multi-family • '29 9 A • • units. The housing in this area is in serious need of rehabilitation. There are no sidewalks on the local streets north or south of Main Street and open drainage ditches are present. The Immokalee Beautification Committee has recently completed the streetscape along this corridor, which includes street lighting and street furniture, The Main Street program has been offering a Facade Grant program as an incentive for renovations to take place. To date five businesses have participated. Many of the buildings need more'that just a façade improvement. There are several parking lots that are not up to code and result in creating dust and dirt along the corridor, which makes it more difficult to maintain the landscaping. Several buildings are vacant. New Market Road New Market Road is the east-west connector in the community. It serves as the main corridor for truck traffic coming to and from the agricultural packinghouses. Much of the existing right of way is used for truck parking and outdoor sells of vegetables during the harvest season, During the winter months this is a hub of activity. The area is zoned commercial from Glades to Charlotte Street and the residential from Glades to SR29. The residential units along new market road are newer and built on larger lots than those in South Immokalee. Truck Traffic through the residential area has a negative impact on maintaining the value of the area.There are few streetlights and sidewalks in the residential sections of the area. Immokalee Drive Immokalee Drive is a two-lane facility that runs west of SR29 to 1st street. There is a mixture of mobile home parks, single and multi-family structures, The Collier County sports complex and Immokalee High School and Middle School is located along this corridor. Several older mobile home parks that do not meet current standards are found along this corridor. There is limited street lighting or sidewalks along the local streets that intersect Immokalee. SR 29 Corridor This four-lane facility has been developed with highway commercial uses and is the main shopping area in the community. There is a mixture of new and old development along this corridor. The one grocery chain that is opened in the community is located in an older strip shopping center at the corner of Lake Trafford and SR29. Although a large number of residents do not have vehicle sidewalks are not available on both sides of the street and may not be continuous. Lake Trafford The Lake Trafford area consists of the largest fresh water lake in.Florida south of Lake Okeechobee. The lake is an integral part of the regional drainage and wetland systems, and coastal estuarine systems. Economic and environmental enhancement of the lake necessitates the removal of an estimated 8.5- million cubic yards of organic sediment from the lake to restore the lake's depth and bottom configuration to its quartz sand bottom; and reduce by as much as one half the nutrient enrichment to the lake. This nutrient enrichment results in proliferation of aquatic plant growth, periodic algae blooms, and fish kills. The Lake restoration project should begin in 2000. The goal of the project is to improve, restore, and enhance the tourism attractiveness of Lake Trafford. Recreational fishing, bird watching, and photography can draw a significant number of visitors to an area. The Lake Trafford Marina currently operates the only small concession stand on the lake.The marina sells bait, rents small boats, and -provides airboat tours of the lake. There is a County owned park, boat ramp and pier at the end of Lake Trafford. On the north side of the lake is a 2000-acre, privately held ranch. The ranch does limited cattle and oil production. There is an older recreational vehicle park next to the marina. Airport and Industrial Park • The Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park consists of over 1000 acres. There is a pre approved master site development plan for the first Phase of development consisting of approximately 44 30 9 A • • acres. The Airport Authority offers many incentives to businesses to locate in the industrial.park. It is a designated as a Foreign Trade Zone, Florida Enterprise Zone and a Foreign Entrepreneurial investment Zone. There is water and sewer available for phase I. A 10,000 square foot manufacturing incubator was opened in 1998 and is completely leased out. it has been difficult to recruit a business to open in this location given the poor housing conditions and lack of amenities in the community; A drag strip has opened at one end of the Airport and has been successful in drawing drivers and spectators. Farm workers Village Farm workers Village is located approximately 1.8 miles from the center of the community. The Village is owned and operated by the Collier County Housing Authority. There are 576 units built and 35 units planned but not yet built. The Village contains a small convenience store, day care, and playgrounds. The first phase.of the development occurred in 1974 with '150 units. All the units are cement block. There is no public transportation available between the village and the commercial core of the community. Village Oaks Elementary School is located across from Farm Workers Village across SR 29. A raised pedestrian bridge across SR 29 provides access between the village and the school. Section 4.6 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (AREA WIDE) STREETS The roadway network east of SR-29 in the Immokalee community is primarily composed of local roads, which are configured in a traditional grid pattern, The area west of SR-29, North of Main Street could be best described as an incomplete roadway network. The Lake Trafford Road corridor contains an incomplete grid pattern, although the framework for one exists, Lake Trafford, which is beginning to experience periods of severe congestion, could be greatly improved if improvements were made to complete a basic grid network and widen this two-lane facility to accommodate boats and recreational vehicles. ' Eustis Avenue in South Immokalee provides east-west movement between 9th Street and First Street (CR-846). it continues approximately 1,500 feet East of First Street serving a small residential area. If Eustis Ave were extended to SR-29, it would provide an east-west alternative•and further support the grid concept. Bethune Avenue and south 9t Street deadline in the south Immokalee area. • The major arterial roadways are State Road 29, Immokalee Road and New Market Road (SR 29A). State Road 29 is a two-lane facility that widens to four lanes through the small downtown area. The four- • • lane segment is called Main Street and.is the focus of redevelopment and economic revitalization. It is the only segment with on-street parking and sidewalks on both sides. The two lane segments of State Road 29 north and east of Main Street are two lanes with no sidewalks. Trucks are encouraged to use New Market Road as an alternate to Main Street to avoid the downtown area. New Market Road is a two-lane facility. with 100 feet of right-of-way and no sidewalks or paved shoulders. Remaining right-of-way and truck parking is limestone. Vegetable and fruit packing houses • and the State Farmers Market are located along this street. Trucks use this street as a bypass road to avoid the downtown area and to-pick up goods for transport. The roadway is in poor condition and maintenance costs are high due to damage by trucks dragging limestone on roadway. Although many people walk or bicycle to work in this area, pathway facilities are unavailable. A loop road was purposed in 1991 during the preparation of the Immokalee Master Plan.. The road would provide relief to the downtown and neighborhood areas from trucks hauling produce to and from the packing houses. 31 9A . First Street (CR 846) intersects with SR 29 at the beginning of Main Street. It is four lanes south of Main Street with sidewalks on both sides. North of Main.Street it narrows to two lanes and has a sidewalk on the west side only, Major problems exist along many of the local roads. There are few sidewalks. Typical street widths are less than twenty feet and open storm water systems are adjacent to roadways without paved shoulders or guardrails_. For example, south of State Road 29, along 9'h Street, there are deep, wide drainage . ditches on both sides of the roadway. There are no sidewalks and no guardrails to safeguard pedestrians and motorists. The roadway width is eighteen feet and there are not enough rights of way to construct pathway facilities without converting the open swales to a covered stormwater system • SEWER AND WATER Public potable water and wastewater services are provided by the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. This district was created by a special act of the Florida Legislature. The District covers roughly twenty- seven square miles. Until 1989, special districts were largely autonomous and had little interaction with local governments. Beginning in 1991, each independent special district is required to submit an annual report to the appropriate local government. WATER . While some households draw their potable water from private wells the vast majority of the Immokalee residents receive water from the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. Although the district boundaries extend 27 square miles, the actual service area is much smaller. • SANITARY SEWER Wastewater treatment is also provided by the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. The central wastewater collection,treatment and disposal system was designed in the late seventies and was constructed and in operation by 1982. The system which is comprised of 80 miles of sewer pipe, 34 lift stations, and a 2.5 MGD treatment. The district owns 640-acre spray field and irrigates approximately 350 acres with treated effluent. However, the Immokalee Water and Sewer District is under a consent order from the Department of Environmental Protection due to insufficient handling of their effluent. The spray fields are inadequate. No new sewer hook-ups can be permitted unless the District can show a reduction of flow to the system. •There are a few separate collection systems that were permitted prior to the creation of the district. Those systems need to be upgraded and included within the district's authority. Additional treatment plants and distribution lines will be needed to serve the entire community. DRAINAGE Both man-made and natural drainage systems collect and transport surface water run-off which occur during and immediately following rainfall.' The two major facilities can function independently of one . another or in combination. Due to the relatively flat topography of Immokalee, drainage occurs in sheet flow pattern within a very shallow but wide depression classified as a slough, Man-made facilities in Immokalee are typically large open swales. Surface water management problems are present within-the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the roads are unpaved and poorly drained. In South Immokalee,where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide Surface water management problems are present within the entire Immokalee study area. These problems include 32 • 9 AA localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within • , the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the roads are unpaved and poorly drained. In South Immokalee where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide, ENVIRONMENTAL The Freshwater Marshes habitat around Immokalee is connected to the slough/swamp system known as Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary and together the two habitats serve two primary purposes as primary • water storage areas and drainage ways for surface flow. Undeveloped marshes should be preserved as part of the natural protection areas. • Immokalee has good.groundwater availability with good development potential of the water table aquifer. There are lands identified on the lmmokalee Future Land Use Map as environmentally sensitive areas. This designation is for informational purposes only; it doesn't constitute new development standards and has no regulatory effect. ELEVATION There is not a flood map for the Immokalee community, Therefore, none of Immokalee is in a Flood zone as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Administration. The Immokalee Community as a whole is one of the highest points in the County. OPEN SPACE There is significant vacant land in the Immokalee Community, However, the majority of it is in/or has been in agricultural production. Most of the parcels are large and under one ownership. The cost of small parcels of land within in the community is considerable higher than comparable parcels in surrounding communities. However, there are opportunities for open space amenities. In terms of recreation use, the.Immokalee community has six park facilities within the Study Area. Two are relatively passive parks containing picnicking facilities, benches, and observation areas. One is located next to the Airport (5 acres) and the other is at Lake Trafford (2.3 acres). The remaining parks, Immokalee Community Park(23 acres) on Immokalee Drive adjacent to the High School, South Immokalee Park (3,2 acres) which houses the American Legion building and a baseball field, Tony Rosbough Park (6,8 acres) off of Little League Road has two baseball fields, and the Immokalee Recreation/Aquatic Facility ('14 acres) located at the Immokalee Middle School site has a.swimming pool and is considered a community park. There is a total of 54 acres presently in recreation use. In addition, the schools in Immokalee have their own recreation areas for physical education programs and interscholastic sports programs. Children under 14 years old comprise a significant percentage of Immokalee's total population: 29% or 3,186 people, according to the 1990 Census. Recreation facilities are necessary to meet the needs of this population. • COMMUNITY FACILITIES • PUBLIC SAFETY The Immokalee Community is served by the lmmokalee Fire Control District. an independent fire district. The service encompasses 215 square miles. There are two fire stations. One station is located on Carson Road and the other is situated on New Market Road. Emergency Medical Service is provided by the County EMS department and has a station located on First Street(CR846). 33 9 A • • The Collier County Sheriffs Department provides police protection to the community. id 1994 a new Immokalee substation was built at the Government complex in Immokalee. In 1996, there were 52 employees at the substation including road patrol and support staff. A community-policing program was initiated in 1996. Due to the young age of the population in the redevelopment there are several elementary schools in the area, along with a middle school and high school IMMOKALEE SERVICE AREA SCHOOLS (1) Early Childhood School: The Learning Center • (2) Elementary Schools: Highlands; Lake Trafford, Pinecrest, Village Oaks (3) Middle Schools: Immokalee Middle (4) High Schools: Immokalee High (5) Adult Education: Bethune Education Center There is one County operated Library in the area Health Care There is not a hospital in the community. There is the Marion E. Feather Health Clinic that is affiliated with the Collier Community Hospital. • • 34 9A • • Section 4,7 Redevelopment Area Goals Develop a circulation pattern for the community, which will provide safe and efficient access throughout the community. This network would include a loop road to provide the separation of commercial truck traffic from•tourist designated places and residential developments. Enhance the physical appearance of properties within the Main Street area. Provide opportunities for adequate, safe, and affordable housing. Encourage the development of both affordable rental and home ownership through rehabilitation and new construction. Develop a program to address the replacement of existing old mobile homes with newer mobile home units or module homes. Provide opportunities for capturing the tourist trade by creating eco-tourism opportunities at Lake Trafford, Peppers Ranch,.and Roberts Ranch. Create adaptive development standards in each of the subdistricts identified in the Immokalee Overlay District to permit flexibility and incentives for redevelopment and development. Encourage neighborhood stability through the implementation of additional streetlights, sidewalks, and landscaping throughout the community. Improve the drainage system throughout the community and improve the appearance and function of the open drainage swales through out the community. Diversify the economy by encouraging the recruitment of businesses to the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. Improve both the landside and airside facilities at the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park to meet the future demands for all forms of aviation and business development activities. • Section 4.8 PHASE I -REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES Achieving the goals of the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan begins with a'focus.on South Immokalee, Main Street, New Market Road and the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. The Plan focuses on Phase I activities (Year 1-5) and becomes more general into the future. Since planning is by nature an evolutionary process, each phase of activity attempts to build upon the successful outcome of earlier phases. Figure 6 identifies the areas of concentration during Phase I. Based on the analysis and the redevelopment goals the following activities were identified for each of the redevelopment subareas in Phase I: South Immokalee Prepare a Stormwater Master Plan for the area that identifies alternatives to the open drainage swales located throughout the subarea and begin implementation. i 35 . . . 9 A , , . . . . , . . Figure 4 • • S 9V i S Lb 1--- I w .=,,,,,,, — Q 2 W — —---- m 0 • PO j CD /.., G`iV ;A- IEJ g W a • VI ze '.; 0 g 8 / _.... , n n r t$r ;. to . eQk CV CVA ' 19� ■ m 4j / —— gt 00 . j . . • Ycrlll o . in cat M Vil • �1; ,.r Nib ' , to . ----, iNru 4,...f � 0 m ® � I �I r�I tr 33 i' a . ate. 11111 to 1 •4 �.. • LU P. a14 g. W cv t -- -- to coN. �g: Fn4• ® CD ^ co 4, iS i Uj y -- N w • . W 03 a (o ;;in. ' w r I 1 N r'` IN i i �`) ( •'• f� J a.• • • 5 9V 1 I S CL 1 1 • .. 36 • • 9 A . i Develop a streetlighting plan for the area and begin to install streetlights In "hot spots" as identified by the Sheriff's Department as high crime areas. Support the development of single family homes on the along the old Atlantic Coastline Railroad Right of Way by developing approved housing plans that meet the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Criteria and Traditional Neighborhood Design that are cost effective, Coordinate with the Collier County Housing Authority to develop these homes. Evaluate the current placement of commercial uses within the neighborhood, approximately from Boston Avenue south to Bethune Avenue and from 16th Street SE west to Ninth Street. Develop a program to encourage private property owners to renovate or demolish existing structures. • Provide a rehabilitation or replacement of substandard housing within the neighborhood. Property may need to be acquired with in this subarea for the implementation of housing and economic development initiatives. Establish or coordinate with an existing non-profit corporation to promote neighborhood revitalization program including housing rehabilitation, land assembly, credit counseling and home maintenance. Promote the development of the One-Stop Career Center as a community focal point. Evaluate the need for neighborhood parks in the community and develop them as appropriate. • Main Street Program Area Develop a program to eliminate the dust that accumulates along Main Street and in the landscaped medians. The program may include placement of sod or resurfacing parking lots. Leverage the Main Street Facade program to encourage the private sector to renovate, demolish, or construct buildings within the Main Street Program area. Develop a Main Street Business Association to work on coordination and implementation of the redevelopment program. Develop a trash incentive program that will provide an incentive to pick up and properly dispose of empty containers and trash within the community. Property may need to be acquired within this subarea for commercial or residential development. Provide interconnection of sidewalks from the local streets perpendicular with Main Street to Main Street. Support the development of the Robert's Ranch Historical site as a tourist destination and a living museum. Encourage the development of appropriate,uses and buffers on the remaining portion of the home site. Provide for the rehabilitation or demolition of substandard housing. Coordinate with a non-profit corporation to coordinate marketing efforts to attract compatible businesses to the Main Street Area and improve the physical appearance, • 37 9 A • Develop a revolving loan fund for business start ups or expansion for businesses locating any where in the community. • New Market Road Based on the Immokalee Transportation Study, identify the alignment for a loop road that will serve the industrial uses along New Market Road and relieve the western portion of New Market Road from truck traffic. Support expanding the uses of the State Farmers Market to allow for resale activities and encourage upgrading the façade of the facility to make it more user-friendly and a tourist destination. Develop incentives to diversify the agricultural production and expand production'to higher value crops. Encourage commercial infill and rehabilitation through flexible development standards and incorporate them into the lmmokalee Overlay District, New Market Subdistrict. Lake Trafford Encourage the continued development and improvement to the Lake Trafford Marina and park to bring tourists into the area. Develop Pepper's Ranch and Preserve into an eco-tourism destination, promote transient lodging facilities and restaurants for this area. Revitalize the neighborhoods adjacent to Lake Trafford Road through a comprehensive housing improvement project that will include increase code enforcement, economic incentives for replacement and rehabilitation of mobile homes and the development or rehabilitation of single and multi-family structures. Install additional streetlights and sidewalks to increase safety in the area. lmmokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park Expand the Service Center at the lmmokalee Manufacturing Incubator to other businesses in the community Market the Foreign Trade Zone and Industrial Park. Develop sites, provide infrastructure; make lease payments, pay principal and interest on debt, buy equipment and any other items needed to re-locate or retain businesses in the Industrial Park. Provide infrastructure and participate in the cost of other facilities in the development of a motor-sports racing complex at the Airport. Develop standards for controls, restrictions and covenants.for the lease of land and for land development regulations. Provided needed infrastructure improvements when necessary to recruit new businesses or to expanded existing businesses at the Airport/Industrial Park. • • 38 •• 9 A . . • Neighborhood Revitalization/Housing Programs Establish a process to foreclose on properties that have tax liens and make that land available for affordable housing Develop incentives for the construction of new affordable housing in the community including reduced permitting fees, land costs, and processing time. • Coordinate with Code Enforcement, the Sheriffs Department and the Department of Revenue to enforce existing dodes and develop new regulations that are appropriate to the needs of the community. Maintain, enhance or develop neighborhood parks throughout the community that are safe and convenient for the residents. Section 4.9 Future Phases Phase II - Years 5-10 Continued emphasis on economic development and public/private partnership to redevelop the Main Street Program area and the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. Neighborhood Revitalization will continue and expand into the areas located off of Immokalee Drive and SR 29 The following activities are planned for Phase II: •- Continue active marketing of the community as a tourist destination. Activities could include assistance with land acquisition, public/private ventures for building improvements, and other marketing incentives. • Continue to support and coordinate with the Immokalee Beautification MSTU efforts and support the expansion of the MSTU boundaries to include the rest of the community • Expand commercial rehabilitation grant to all other areas. • • Continue land assembly for the development of new affordable housing • Continue to install streetlights and sidewalks and shade trees throughout the community. • Complete the construction of the Lobp Road and other roadway improvements as needed to provide . the alternative truck route, moving the trucks out of Main Street, • Coordinate with the Parks and Recreation Department to maintain and improve open space and • recreation opportunities in the community. • Coordinate with Farrmworkers Village to develop programs that move tenants from renter housing to home ownership. • • • • 39 • 9 A Phase III -Years 10-20 • Emphasis will be stabilization of neighborhoods and the economic vitality of the community. The . .following activities will be undertaken: • Continue land assembly for the future development of affordable housing and economic • development, . • Continued commercial rehabilitation for all areas • Continued marketing of the area as a tourist destination. • Continue infrastructure improvements including roads, drainage, sewer and water expansion, and sidewalks • Continue neighborhood revitalization in all areas. • • i 1 • • 40 • 9 A • • Section 4.10 Neighborhood Impact Statement _ The structure of the lmmokalee Redevelopment Plan was specifically organized to have a positive impact on housing and residential neighborhoods by providing incentives to rehabilitate and replace unsafe housing:The intensive redevelopment activities recommended in the plan concentrate on existing commercial and semi-industrial areas including the lmmokalee Regional Airport/Industrial Park. With the specific objective of enhancing the existing residential neighborhoods of the area, the • lmmokalee Redevelopment Plan recommends a comprehensive approach to revitalizing neighborhoods. The emphasis in the Plan is to provide incentives to property owners to renovate or replace substandard housing. In addition to housing the following other improvements are recommended: - Connecting local streets to improve internal circulation. - Stimulating development of additional housing on vacant lots - Improving stormwater management - Improving sewer service to neighborhoods - Improving interconnections between neighborhoods and commercial developments -' Improving trash collection in neighborhoods - Providing pro-active code enforcement - Installing streetlighting and landscaping to promote pedestrian activities - Develop neighborhood parks that will provide recreational activities General Impacts: Since the provision of supportive services to existing residents and the additional low and moderate income housing in the area are primary objectives of the plan, the overall impacts of the proposed redevelopment program are expected to be positive, with few negative impacts anticipated. The proposed direct redevelopment activities are anticipated to displace a minimal amount of residents of affordable housing. It is anticipated that residents that may be temporarily displaced will have a better quality product to choose from due to the redevelopment efforts, • Relocation: As stated above, the proposed redevelopment activities were specifically developed to minimize residential relocation. For any relocation that is required, this plan contains a proposed relocation policy that will provide supportive services and equitable financial support to any individuals or families that are subject to relocation ® Traffic circulation: The proposed street improvements in the community were conceived with the specific intent of reducing the negative impacts of inappropriate through traffic. The loop road is intended to reduce truck traffic in the New Market neighborhood and the Main Street area. Thereby improving the area. There should be minimal need for any relocation to build the loop road. a Environmental quality: • - Water. Quality: The proposed redevelopment activities and the proposed stormwater master plan for the lmmokalee community will serve to enhance stormwater quality in the area. The redevelopment activities will pipe and cover the open swales which are nuisance and health concern in the neighborhoods. • -Availability of community facilities and services: A primary objective of the redevelopment plan is increased delivery of all types of community services. Therefore, the impacts of the proposed program should be positive. The primary community facility in the area is the Shadowlawn Elementary School. The proposed activities should have no negative impacts on the school. 41 9 A • Section 4.10 "` Program of Public Expenditures This section focuses on the public sector investment costs and sources of funds to carry out Phase improvements for the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan. Discussion of the mechanisms for managing and packaging capital investments and the CRA redevelopment financing strategy is provided in Section 2 of this plan. The program of public expenditures (see Table One) summarizes the public expenditures to be made in the Immokalee redevelopment area. The Table identifies the projects, total costs (when available), local appropriations, and other potential sources of funding including Tax Increment Revenues. The Plan does not include specific allocation of tax increment revenues. Instead, the plan identifies tax increment revenues as a potential source of funding for redevelopment projects. The dollar amount for each project will be determined at a later date. Costs and funding sources will be refined with input from the Immokalee Redevelopment Advisory Committee and the program of public expenditures amended by CRA Board action when appropriate. • TABLE One Proposed Publicly Funded Capital Projects and Other Proposed Projects Project Name Total TIF Local Source Local Capital Projects Cost Funds Immokalee Football/Soccer $ 110,000 $110,000 AdValorem/ Impact Fees Robert's PUD/North 11th St. $ 170,000 $170,000 Gas Tax Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan $ 580,000 Grants Sidewalks $ 367,000 $367,000 MPO Immokalee Mobility Study $ 25,000 $25,000 MPO South Immokalee Stormwater Management Improvements TBDL • MSBU/grants • Streetlights TBDL MSTU/grants Land Acquisiton TBDL Grants Commercial Rehabilitation TBDL • Grant, Main Street • Housing Development TBDL Grants Permitting/Development Fees TBDL Marketing TBDL Grants Main Street Program Parking Lot Improvements TBDL MSTU/grants Commercial Rehabilitation TBDL Grants Trash Incentive Program TBDL Grants • 42 9 .A : _. , . , _ _______, 'TABLE One -continued . Project Name Total T!F Local Source ____ Funds Land Acquisiton TBDL Grants Permitting/Development Fees TBDL SidewalksTBDL Grants/state/local Enclose drainage swales TBDL Grants/state/local/MSB U Roberts Ranch Historic Site TBDL Grants/state/local/fed - Marketing TBDL Grants New Market Road Loop Road Construction TBDL Impact Fees/Grants/Gas Tax Renovation to.State Farmers Market TBDL Grants/state Zoning Overlay AdValorem Lake Trafford Marketing • TBDL AdValorem Land Acquisiton TBDL Grants Permitting/Development Fees TBDL Grants Housing Development TBDL Grants Housing Rehabilitation TBDL Grants Streetlights TBDL 'Grants Sidewalks TBDL . ' Grants Neighborhood Revitalization Land Acquisiton • TBDL Grants Permitting/Development Fees TBDL Grants Infrastructure Improvements TBDL Grants Landscaping TBDL Grants Park improvements TBDL Grants • 43 9 A • • — Table One Continued lmmokalee Regional Airport&lmmokalee Regional Park • Project Name Total TIF Local Source Rehabilitate Runway 9-27 Lights $ 175,000 $ 35,000 Replacement and refurbishing of �~ runway lights along Runway 9-27 Construct Taxiway - Phase I $ 162,500 $32,500 Construction of taxiway from runway system to new t-hangar building. Taxiway Phase II $ 162,500 $32,500 Construction of taxiway from runway system to new t-hangar building. • Environmental Mitigation $ 55,000 $ 11,000 Remove wetland from proposed taxiway and t-hangar development area and mitigate for environmental impact. Bulk Storage Hangar $ 400,000— $200,000 Construct a bulk storage /maintenance hangar. T-hangar Building $ 500,000 $250,000 Construct a t-hangar building with taxilane. Bulk Storage Hangar $ 460,000 - $230,000 Construct a bulk storage/maintenance hangar. T-hangar Building $ 455,000 $227,500 Construct a t-hangar building with taxilane. T-hangar Building $, 509,000 $254,500 Construct a t-hangar building with taxilane. 44 9 A • Table One Continued Project Total Cost TIF LOCAL SOURCE FUNDS T-hangar Building $ 475,000 $237,500 Construct a t-hangar building with taxilane. Conceptual ERP $ 350,000 $70,000 Rehabilitate Runway 18-36 $ 600,000- $120,000 Rehabilitate runway 9-27 " $ 600,000 $120,000 Rehabilitate Runway 18-36 to address safety issues. • Expand Apron $ 350,000' $70,000 Rehabilitate Runway 9-27 to address safety issues. Expand aircraft parking demands to meet parking Demands. Emergency Generator $ 100,000 $20,000 Acquire and install emergency generator. U:S. Customs Facility $ 230,000 $46,000 -- Construct a U.S. Customs Facility and aircraft apron. Runway Extension - Design and DRI $ 250,000 $12,500 Phase Design and permit extension of Runway Runway Extension-Construction $ 1,750,000 $87,500 Construct extension of Runway Taxiway Phase II $ 162,500 $32,500 ' . Construction of taxiway from • runway system to new t-hangar building. Manufacturing Incubator Phase II $ 480,000 $48,000 Construct a manufacturing assembly, wet processing bay and bonded storage facility. 45 9 A Table One continued Projects Total Costs TiF Local Source • Funds _ Aiprak Boulevard Extension $ 179,000 $. 17,900 T Extend roads'and all utilities including, but not limited to, water main, sanitary sewer line, underground three-phase electric, telephone service and drainage swales along the entire length of road extension. • Industrial Site improvements $ 480,250 $ 48,025 Fill, grade and install primary drainage system on various airside and landside sites for future Development. $ 8,885,750 $ 2,202,925 Motor-sports Racing Complex Infrastructure Master plan project and construct restrooms, showers, campground facilities and spectator parking. • • • • 46 • 9 A • • • Section 4.11 'Vaiviatlon The current tax base of the Immokalee area, is based on tax assessment data from the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office is provided on the table below. The tax increment projections proposed are based a conservative three percent increase in taxable property values for the years 2000-2010. The three- percent is based on general historic and economic observations in the community. TAX DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS • • IMMOKALEE FROZEN COUNTY-WIDE Annual Cumulative YEAR TAXABLE VALUE TAX BASE INCREMENT - MILLAGE Tax Increment Tax Increment • 1999 $148,127,153 $148,127,153- $0 4.026f $0 $0 2000 $152,980,141 $148,127,153 $4,455,732 4.0261 $18,997 $16,997 2001 $157,569,546 $148,127,153 $9,045,137 4.0261 $34,503 ' $51,500 ' 2002 $162,296,632 $148,127,153 $13,772,223 4,0261 $52535 $104,035 2003 $167,185,531 $148,127,153 $18,641,122 4.0261 $71,108 $175,143 2004 $172,180,497 $148,127,153 $23,656,088 4.0261 ' . $90,238 $266,381 2005 $177,345,912 $148,127,153- $28,821,503 4.028f $109,941 $375,322 2006 $182,666,289 $148,127,153 $34,141,880 4.0261 $130,236 $505,559 2007 $188,146,278 $148,127,1531 $39,621,869 4.0261 $151,140 . $656,699 2008 $193,790,666 $148,127,153 $45,266,257 4.0261 $172,671 $829,370 2009 $199,604,386 $148,127,153' $51,079,977 4.0261 $194,848 $1,024,218 2010 $205,592,518 $148,127,153 '$57,068,1091 4.0261 ' $217,690 $1,241,908 Scenario Assumptions of Immokalee CRA: 1. Frozen Tax Base Assumesthe Community Redevelopment Plan is adopted in June 2000. 2. The County-wide Millage Rate is based on FY99/00 Genera Revenue Rate of 3.5058 and the Unincorporated Rate of.5203. - 3. A 3%Annual Growth Rate is applied to years 2001-2010. 4. Annual Tax Increment is 95%of Total Tax Revenue. • • • • • • • 47 9 A , .1 . ,\\,,,,,,,s,„ . ,b„, l'IrrsN 2Fi Creativity in Bloom SECTION 5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Plan First Amendment May2019 I.--- : , T j... t 1141 x r 13yj Q,�. s ,t y S yy i'i , _ �� 1 'y �\ ,. s� . ^W �' j r !t A m" ,y' its �' -.,..�.m•*s-.,.-,..2 :` s` V i. r rl J fS!SIOP; �° � of , � y � a� �• �r0 ��.t9 �,rra . 8 e �:: — s u ic t ,,. ,"t^',,''"*.4e0k.e., ..,, 4+4,'',,,p,',,A. '''''. .*'' ' ,,,,'", 1 ,f, , 7014All 14:14‘ . ',....„ • . ,r1 -- - ss' .i.e.,`,. 4 r��FF ii;,,,,,11,-....acv; 1,1111k, ss _- :111 1SJ `+,`�„\ •?''s;„a ,v a,,,ras ; •' to ,)( ,, �[ a , - \\ t. . . . . . . . ,. ,,. ,,,-,,,., , , ../.. . ? "*.- ;;;;er, ,..--*. I P.i i IM, ,„ ,.., , , , , * _Aor ate.. ° lindale hii , t � ew — OIiver design r v.^ to \w, \ \e ti a`\ to • \ \\G\ \ Rr",,."• r�\`� h a , \a Aq ai° 4.';, ,a x " w 'A \ • .h• �\ ? x\„k*`."ret`., N��",,,�'�.`�1 � `4�+"•��`,`., 3 ` . \ • e` " `�A ".:sN 4"`:S "a � G , ,tw\‘, a ,a, `i, �, 4,y „,'a",, ".•\,•• ' ?i,,"a arFS �. 2': c� q , bN l \, \ \' ",%tiZ ,' 'd. ,%'-,,'.4s,•'` i`xa a,'6a\ \4 ,c 5 \ " • " , \ , \,, ;,"•,,",Z` °\ w,,,,4, ,0"' ,,d� w`•'y ,x ,S`a a,Qv�,0\ \ ,`,•,xt�w"` ,. } ' `.,\, �\Z`,,,,:,\, 4�,� ;x\' '\,.: �vax�," ` i •v`' \ a\,,.•,,4'� ••,,\ "4, ` a4, i'R•�Exit'\ l."•vv•s,t ,\ „,N\`," �":rV� w ` aM• AV• ,xs \ \:-,s,k,5,,; bs , , w"` R ;`,\\e \ .,�";v • r, :•a 'iR\ t:,.„ \•, \ * w "°S•'" ,,x " 1$ ,,,,*xy!•a t,"" t� ,, v\� a r.,'t` ' ""a•' � ':" d ,,,,Ns•'r,, aa • , \• .,re\• e\ ,i • \' •,d "4 J „ ,.a . ti•,:0 ."" 'i": y •twt,, �t9 •` , ` " S•\0'qa„ a "• ,,G.le\\4,' <:Z� ,4 a a�N • • ‘,,k'\y s a•�1,�`: \,Ntx,\"xd.•,,4w�h SXare a�,•,w$Aw�.8:v�«;a\C;':"'a,<'\a\vy. st0�;w a'd a,,.A t9 t.\,a`L'a^,:" L"s s ' 0.•i' ,d,•,,,:,x,k P.F A\�,,t,•M�,x•'�, �.,\ak,,, t��`;.i'"S`?qh,\i``oH�\• '`^"t"• ..„, • aea ;,\\, "�a. `q °i\ "\� ` lh v•\`t+\�,,`tq \, \ .i,"�", �\"R 4 ^ w ,` .,•\, W" ,•aA, ` \ `\s\ �•' \'`3`x a 0,w,s";,h\ ;a" y� i4 \wa, „ � ,,',, `�' LiL `�,"�� \.s4 E,";N : ,:• ,4 , * .4* :,x, '�.c"•,• Y� n` ".:�\ � ,,s�, •' C` i z` \;" k" r. 'A\"\6' u y„; `w, °A `�° � \\ , `,R \ Sw e �$, • w •\ Rw"`"a;w VaaYy" ?,a.y vAu �" \aw, .� \ \ .,. `,S . 0F$wat\, si? a \ da;j;,A,t sA d ' i W,NIs> ",`6, , ,ss• A:� A'sk A :"‘,A;•, • ,, h"\ h 4� a \a•", a �"� '�` Ui rx , x g`� . "a..\ k�.`A.' '� Y e $;`, ,. ; ;xxiN",, 4` � `••• Y+ a:`$lq t\ \ „ a'0 \ \ • A - 0 ', ,m x \ . :, ra 1, q \ ` ' \\ s, ,•,° r" x .,t y ',' „ x,t\\ e,\;,x ,e�\ , • • \• " v ;\ gi ,,•,\ , � \ , wa • b 'a, ,"; ,w2," t, ,� , " \ ,1• y ," `;v < ' ",.r a n, Y" * ,r,,,"•,\,, , ;4 ' a,, • ;` `\„iep;`", " S \• � u ^ •,,0 . � , ' y,\ s '.aa axa y,.0s,, \ , `\ rs •"; � .‘ ‘`•'a , \ '\\ :\" " % a3 u,at A;A,`'� ~ \�C � ,`\q•i4w 4N S �\, �'; d i • a y`,a , �` ,xw+ "„ ; `Rie'r \akya ,l,,Tv : ° ahaa PP•,^` ;°'�a ,"'`tea,' �, ,\," s,x\, ,\ I ' d ,:':;'rw\„,q` v e ` ?' :d\;•` '"w• `� " \` c " ��,� � \ e„ h�� ° !"t ''4 'Us\: �• „ • fi" : " ,' ,x+, .`�' �' , ' ? a p : °� rc :\"„ 4 ywwat\ .E?'� a„` \+ ,a�t` V � � P; t ?\ • \' � u ,\ \1 \ `y ;a :• t ,• ` '� ya, ' \ ryy s , „a, , - sV''''"e ` M•';+ s'sa`o"t " t,V, m m, 'r ., : w `>G • ,A• '`• ;\ •• ' ' \ h,` , �a•,� aly •` � a� a, �c'�,\� `\ �, `Rse a :\3; b`;<",a\ •" �� '',� d,,y�r„t",+ .a\ ,,s Y,` . ,t m\\� .. ar x v0 `x, \' '," Z',t,".•`•`\s :\ ", hC ti a , ` ` a '\ a> d ,M ` \ x a a ,)\Z`:t'a <" a,a dt • ,x „`, "\� ,�,,,,''y } p " r a, �"�. 1 ,, ' r\..' wa " \.\t a°` \ '•>>;�`. Fn a` \4 ,v, ,So: h 4414,14,,,,,,„ ;k4. ::41,,•,44 440 ,4\a M'm, '" " •,,,`40, � a ,ehs‘'‘',Ws.}+,.„„+' .„t',, , , is v 4,, . "'$R i :;,a` " " 0, &,\ a" , a' ,,," „y, :, , •,\x.\a\�4 #` R,y da,,' L ' • �m"\ ,M , w , a ' ' xwE a,4 a , \h .h , " bkm ;$ i y y :,,, e , "" e,: "'' "\ w, 4 ,` \i`� ,w '`� \ \ *44 ;,', \. M '„*\ yWs g, ,w .\ " ` • y\ TA'x ,>NO,:•..„` r y ` "t" v\ � �1 � vk , y,,' - ;. , ye M `,, s o\ ,, � k t,.,/4. rA \ ,,A, t2 \ v,i , ',. .,'„ a`,V a. Y:+$\', e }, sso) ""•a, S ` • \ Y ." �, P a r d� . .Y • Q , , ' , S •: •AA•0-0A‘,,, A ,' \ w , , , . `. , s.,. s , `. .' r,\ ,s v ✓ ` ' " S, o\h ,.•\Av‘ < s 'A\"'t '". '\,+� o444- ,"aa\. v , ,\ \ ' t.,i4, a, \• c\ \• ' ' • \\ • . y,\•,, ' .,y , s x\ C „',v q\,a ''aa,a.'"py ,a t'' s"e 'S SS sw,,\a y\k \\aR a -•s,`\ h` \ \",i':"a \ Z 'Ws s � $ ' " y A " 1` �a �a 4 , • w 441` s@`:41, \• a.$ -s i\s "• �,rS`� \. ,,• '"\ A',\", ". "'"Yi '� `e,\ M .etl '","y„" „\\, � ..., aµ Prepared for !.`tom 440044 a ` w 4 \ A �t f w. �� tt'+trttl ,�t i;1, v ha Airw „,,, Prepared by • 444 4 ,„,, h\ lindale ,ito 0 ,..,.,. S ►liv+ r „. design ,,, • May 2019v,'v A. Cover Photo Sources.Zyscovich Architects, , if Google.com-Marys Palacios oriiii ap \;spa\c,`\„�` . 9,,,,,,,,,,:‘,,, :.„:„..,„ .:::: „,,,, ,,,,„,,,,„„:.:„.,,,,,,„,„„„,,,,,,,,‘,,,,,„,,„ , ,„,,,,„„,„,,x,„:„,„„,,,,„,,,,,„„,„,,,„!,,,,,,,,,.„,,..„„...‘„„, A .„,,,i1,40,,,,,,,,,,,,„„,,:,,,„,„,,,,,,,,..,,,,,§,,,,f,„ 5 y a� iN ..e , TABLE TENTS „siatoitoiftztor 5.0 Executive Summary 5-E-1 't '� 14 t 5.0.1 Executive Summary 5-E-1 5.0.2 Goals 5-E-1 ' 5.0.3 Conceptual Plan Diagram 5-E-4 5.0.4 Character Areas 5-E-7 5.0.5 Focus of Redevelopment 5-E-9 5.0.6 Prioritization&Funding 5-E-10 tit 5.0.7 2000&2019 Plan Comparison 5-E-14 5.1 Introduction 5-1-1 5.1.1 Vision 5-1-1 5.1.2 Process 5-1-1 °',°; 5.1.3 Plan Organization 5-1-1 5.2 Background 5-2-1 5.2,1 Creation of the CRA Area 5-2-1 `fib 5.2.2 2000 Redevelopment Plan Goals and Projects 5-2-1 .r Y tt y s 5.2.3 Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA 2019 Perspective 5-2-9 � 5.3 Planning Framework&Elements 5-3-1 ‘ ,, 5.3.1 Conceptual Plan Diagram 5-3-2 1 t 5.3.2 Land Use& Urban Design 5-3-7 @\ 5.3.3 Public Space, Parks,&Open Space 5-3-26 4", 5.3.4 Development 5-3-31 5.3.5 Transportation,Connectivity,&Walkability 5-3-42 4 5.3.6 Infrastructure 5-3-59 y �� 5.3.7 Process 5-3-66 5.3.8 Character Areas 5-3-67 ,_<1 5.4 Prioritization Plan 5-4-1 5.4.1 Prioritization of Projects&Initiatives 5-4-1 Y. , :; 5.4.2 Financing Planning 5-4-1 5.4.3 Projects&Initiatives Prioritization 5-4-5 5.4.4 Coordination&Partnerships 5-4-17 *. �. 5.5 General Requirements 5-5-1 ; 5.5.1 Overview of Relevant Statutes 5-5-1 �1 "<0- 5.5.2 Consistency with the County's Comprehensive Plan 5-5-1 k4 , 5.5.3 Acquisition, Demolition/Clearance, & Improvement 5-5-1 5.5.4 Zoning&Comprehensive Plan Changes 5-5-1 5.5.5 Land Use, Densities,&Building Requirements 5-5-1 5.5.6 Neighborhood Impact 5-5-5 5.5.7 Safeguards,Controls, Restrictions,&Assurances 5-5-5 5.6 Tax Increment&MSTU Estimates 5-6-1 ystYt 5.6.1 Tax Increment Financing 5-6-1 5.6.2 Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTUs) 5-6-2 5.6.3 Underlying Assumptions 5-6-12 i 9 A This page is intentionally left blank. is ii Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 0� 1 C. rot .,may \,\„\,‘,„\, tee ,EXECU, TIVE SUMMARY `tea.,.\ ,+�'•'•r Ye .•' ,e ., /.. �,_,`' - _ � ' 11 "b^• ,` .. i e 1 .ter } hf N' vl' ,� r}. iy$ 9" : `± •' � Rs w u • ?! • '3S. xa'. ' � # lita. irtq» Sys :r V ;fi R .s • 1t1 „ :.i.,.-+",wdd:"•°rti,'�Lj^n�.tom' ,• '"C+,sffi•" -.�- 5 . 0 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9A aK 5.0.1 Executive Summary 5.0.2 Goals The Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area The main goals of the Plan include: Plan amendment provides an updated long-term Land Use & Urban Design vision and approach for the redevelopment of this component area (see Map 5 ES 1). Promote a defined, harmonious, and urban visual and land use character tailored to the CRA area, cultivating The Plan brings together information gathered from its unique artistic and cultural identity. technical analysis, fieldwork observation, and public and agency outreach (documented in further detail in Public Space, Parks, & Open Space a separate Assessment Memo). From these efforts and Ensure accessible, activated, and well-maintained the resulting themes identified, an overarching vision �.; public spaces, parks, and open space. emerged for the future of the Community Development Redevelopment Agency(CRA) and this component p area: Foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability and prosperity for community members. Promote quality of life and economic vitality with a Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability Ensure safety, comfort, and convenience for various mixed-income, urban, methods of transportation within and connecting with multi-modal community that welcomes visitors, the CRA area. cultivates the area's artistic and cultural identity, Infrastructure uplifts unique local destinations, and finds balance Provide effective infrastructure that preserves with the natural environment. environmental and neighborhood design quality through coordinated improvement planning and •,xaa.. .teR,.R.e..,•r,_r•,.,,,,,.z_+�mt t a.:s.�at � funding. Process The Redevelopment Area Plan lays out a framework of Carry out CRA area planning and implementation goals, objectives, and strategies organized thematically efforts to engage and serve the various communities in support of this overall vision, along with a list of within the CRA area. projects to carry out the framework. This plan is meant to provide a palette of options, generated by the technical analysis, fieldwork observations, and public Figure 5-ES-1 provides a Concept Diagram focused on and agency outreach, that the CRA can further location-specific capital improvement projects, explore. Consequently, not all of these suggestions will followed by a list of non-location-specific capital necessarily be carried through to full implementation. improvements projects and a description of non- Full implementation of approaches and projects will be capital projects (e.g., plans, studies, grant programs). based on further study of capacity, technical feasibility, and public priorities. 5-E-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 Map 5-ES-1:Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Study Area ."'1I N � -DAVIS BLVD , 11 A. �'`-,k KIRKWOOD AVE cc ,i • LINWOOD AVE 7 J a •� yr ,jam T — nib � F N,,,,., ,': 90 j.zy:I."-i: -,-, •. , rx ,, I �4 i •- .. a i ,,, 1 ll , „ d - C tiP BARRETT AVE ; Na cc y, w w> cc .. O 8t Wj v=, Sugden D ��Sr4R m B Regional .. m (fro t Park Ciry,oft!2.r_, fi l Naples __I. -;I I,.. u THOMASSON DR... = ‘, 1 ..liii 1 'I4 O „- . r Naples KAREN DR East Naples * .l i ¢ Botanical Community �rli. yLt�: 1 z Park �1�• ;Garden �lAk .c� al w/ uWr . , Bayview • - .ax aka. . , - is - flu .i-.... , CRA Bounds fY '' 1 - . 31li l/t It vft .I .. .:is 4 • Collier County Government Center vku k l uJtr • ANDREWS AVE ` . ° CH of Naples within CRA ait vltt .1� `{...•aUa •v.U.rr ukv CH TT Park a) al 0 t p vlt. :r' V1t .P. vLr :. Wetlands t w., a� v(t akr _j City of Naples at z aI t vU vku 5�1 �' . .:: b. :r.. � .: _- `� vJ,ir ;��..' vlu :: ''�' :: salk _.. " 71 '>� k-'- i �`r glu t d: 3J e lei Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 t 5-E-2 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9A y.� This page is intentionally left blank. 5-E-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 a 4011.0 hp. To g CU 4„1„.‘,N,,,,,,,,,,...--. -„,,,,,„ **L\ 4 8o +r, tom+ g s t] `p " m c a m \ ‘'IN g � a „ � 7 v 0 `o v o u u u 8- p o i, Q e i s I \ ilk Lo ..... ■ `I'Ed �+ sa die I • N ♦ - I 41 u ` —oo HO NOSSVWOH1 iarnia \'' .,.."1".\\r-.< '.04r1=1 4'4*.s -,,,,,,,,,: 4 `7.h'i,'"' P. ' *CO t§, � 1 uapOns \�� •�\ ��\\� m � •� ��.3 '� • \\c i\ ig c \I, \�i ) '\' cL\� \ ,,`. , 4i t F r - h n...Hn is1 fy , I R. iNgt 1:- 6 Q"`� 3 o mat, *_,4 'at I �" 4 n Yr ' E ,art & ,,n y <F a c �9 ,2 < C N tom., C O L v t C ••I a 0 o -. 'a 3 Z .m L 2 >- a v 0° m 0 G N C y 0 cr z �a av - v = a vE � 4.0 0 C o a F Ea, v o « o .F M C. a 2 ,- Y .o a v E = a A L .- "_ a E f0 "' v W w v - E 3 v 0 S ,C C a o N a a �^ ,. o C.) f0 w m v m w .s n _ ° o '' c.a r) " '� w c" o u 2 c c v " w CI1 v 2 o' .6 u; w " ; � 'E `o x O f0 g " ` v u E 2 o v .� @ m ua tl! 0 LLa .� E vai uo `_c o ro a - E m 9 A `; E \ icir.,,, v a m:o. m x; v L`o ° O >- m ° v i r'' 1 1 i e.„,-. s• ,,, 1 k \ L c � > y C ~ L sA A LL O W p 0 ¢ pc a O E CW p Qv L O m° >o f c a Y o \ E T E._ mf 3 o I ° % 0. o . a I Nt v O O « JW o, o ac d`a v ' Uno ° ui 1a1 o vv ` aQ -5, m L c' N -E- W i C cO > L. N > a s CO uK L m c 6Q as9p '^ go' m °' a v o 5 o oamm m O E N L N a U ` ° ` ° v ¢ w 8° H? Z co ° -oLEEE3Nv °u o . o - E '-a I: v` v° E v g'5 > - o ° e o, o 3 > o s E 7 3 0 c T i t ac ° ° >7L - ' 0 = ° '' a - v a m m , ¢ x a > > 3N o00t- o mr ux K v,... W ¢ m u d w LL < d d ci Li d w s W d m v d w ,i l7 d ai li ¢ i U d < on r 'o > a m d cc Ta - _ 0 $ 4 •"' o o - M V c° L 2 otf c E al o w G 9 w w ° in in t o O. a - E E a v v C ', 2 E i a, a m m E t- fA 3 0 ° n a I c G P.' a i E EEp ._ c m 2 0 0 w a 8 8 Cl Q.9 h C n • ay w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w ' Sri O O C > co cu C 0 - 0 ETC O Q C C O V C v pp - c 0 a ocu F 3' n • 3 0 v :_ I- 2 >- N °c Q O L M f0 CO N w F w w X' w w ui 9A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 Non-Location Specific Capital Projects Project Type Project Name Public Space, Parks,&Open Space A. Pocket Park Land Acquisition &Development B. General Parks Improvements C. Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements Development A. Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust Transportation,Connectivity, & A. Sidewalk Gap Improvements Walkability B. Bicycle Infrastructure C. Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements D. General Multi-Modal Improvements Infrastructure A. Water Main and Fire Suppression Upgrades B. Stormwater Improvements C. Upgrade Sanitary Sewer Lines Non-Capital Projects • General market study/economic profile Projects and initiatives that are not capital • Bayshore Drive Complete Street technical investments include a variety of plans, studies, and feasibility grant programs in support of redevelopment or capital • Bayshore Drive Complete Streets pilot project d; project planning throughout the CRA area. These non- capital projects and initiatives include: • Triangle retention pond improvements CRA operating expenditures and administrative Micro enterprise and arts incubator updates Grants and funding programs, including: Land Development Code updates • Residential improvements grants/loans Development support for catalyst development sites Commercial facade improvements Master planning for: • Wall and fence funding for areas with • Stormwater improvements incompatible uses • Arts and culture-oriented development and • Public art funding redevelopment efforts • Economic development incentives , • Implementation of Complete Streets projects • Mobile home replacements '. • Community safety and clean-up • Community Land Trust housing construction • Branding • Other affordable/workforce housing investments • Marketing and communications Other non-capital expenditures that may arise in the = r • Water and fire infrastructure improvements future and are not yet identified Feasibility studies, including: Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-E-6 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I A 5.0.4 Character Areas The Redevelopment Area Plan framework can be tailored to different sub-areas depending on their specific character, needs, and opportunities. Map 5-ES-2 lays out these different sub-areas, or"Character Areas" with accompanying descriptions. Mini Triangle/Davis Shadowlawn • The Mini Triangle, including CRA-owned • Primarily a residential neighborhood with mix parcel, is a major commercial redevelopment of apartments/duplexes and single-family opportunity and Focus Development Node homes around Shadowlawn Elementary • Corridor commercial along Davis • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus • Linwood Avenue another potential area for Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between redevelopment. north and south sections of CRA area 0 Airport Pulling4 p Tamiami • Mix of corridor commercial, larger big-box • Corridor commercial and residences, style retail, and County Center including two major malls, Gulfgate Plaza and • Part of area currently designated as an Courthouse Shadows) Activity Center in Future Land Use Map • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area 0 6 Windstar North Bayshore • Residential is primarily condos and single- • Focus Corridor along Bayshore Drive with family homes in gated communities neighborhood commercial (including • Includes golf course designated as a Haldeman Creek Entertainment Center near commercial use Creek) • Mix of multi-and single-family residential • Focus Intersection at Bayshore/Thomasson with planned roundabout South Bayshore • CRA-owned Focus Development Node (17- • Primarily single-family residential Acre Site) neighborhood with Naples Botanical Garden • Wetland considerations for development ■ ■ ■ ■ Focus Corridor Focus Development Node/Intersection ' 5-E-7 ` : Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 . 9A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 Map 5-ES-2:Character Areas i-)i,V{S BLVD-` ( B4, i'1,-,,v '.)0[)AV'i 1 LINWOOD AVE a Aa a '— t ci cr , . 41 �I — _ . 4 at 1 ,., w • vRL1 r f VE 6la ,. �G � c tIVpST > Sugden qR c Regional I,; m 9.41,,j) N Park sr r a I in THl)N1A)SC -_ , Ll l I ; K/\iLl\ L'( Fast Naples ' a , Naples = Community - Rotanical Y '" Carden Park ,Utz - Payview 1 '._ "R k4 ykr Alk. aUx 3 Park ( a✓ -s! :. vlc alA s2lt al, 4...1- �.. : .. CRA Boundary kJ.a ::'AtU i. - vlur :., I Park ... 4. Wetlands •all �� d.. _. ... .,4,;,, C J City of Naples '' M a. r, xb I .,. 41k si lfe I v- Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 f'5E8 9 A 5,0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Infill development on vacant residential lots 5.0.5 Focus of Redevelopment • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets The following provides a focus of redevelopment for • each Character Area based on the specific Complete Street improvements along Shadowlawn Drive • characteristics described in Map 5-ES-2 and the most relevant redevelopment strategies. 3. Airport Pulling 1. Mini Triangle/Davis • Transitions between residential neighborhoods • Urban-styleand commercial development mixed use commercial ., • Eventual street enhancements,redevelopment, including capitalization on the y Mini Triangle as a catalyst development site and connectivity across Airport Pulling Rd t urban-style parking solutions • Commercial facade improvements • Park development at retention pond site 4. Tamiami • Complete Streets design and commercial • Connectivity to Downtown Naples via US 41 redevelopment along Linwood Ave and other • nearby commercial roadways; pedestrian scale Redevelopment of Courthouse Shadows street design between Mini Triangle, Linwood • Tenant opportunity and site improvements for Ave, and the proposed retention pond park walkable design at Gulfgate Plaza • Improved access to Mini Triangle development 5. Windstar from US 41, Davis Blvd, and Linwood Ave • Complete Streets and MSTU improvements along , • Multi-modal connectivity: major community roadways, including Bayshore "' • Across Davis Blvd Drive, Thomasson Drive, and Hamilton Avenue • Between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, • Access to Bayview Park proposed retention pond park, and 6. North Bayshore eastern Triangle neighborhood • Corridor commercial development along Bayshore �` • To Downtown Naples potentially via Davis Drive, including Haldeman Creek Entertainment Blvd, US 41, and Gordon River Bridge Center near Creek and creative parking solutions improvements • Larger redevelopment opportunities of 17-Acre • Additional infrastructure improvements: sanitary Site and Del's 24 property sewers, electrical, stormwater • Arts and culture-oriented development .` 2. Shadowlawn • Transitional elements between corridor • Residential structural enhancement and upgrades commercial and residential areas along Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive • Avoidance of incompatible uses • Transitional elements between different uses • Development of vacant residential lots 5-E-9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 • Neighborhood Complete Streets and trails date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for • Connections between Sugden Regional Park and the purposes of the capital and non capital planning CRA area effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. • Water main and fire suppression upgrades This Plan does not obligate any funding to any projects • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets listed. It provides a guide and list of both 7. South Bayshore capital and non-capital projects that require approval by the CRA Advisory Board within the initial 11-year • Mobile home and single-family home residential programming period and allocation through the improvements, upgrades, affordability standard operating and procurement guidelines • Development of vacant residential lots adopted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners • Access to Bayview Park if TIF revenues are to be used for funding. Approval by relevant decision-making bodies is required for other • Connections between CRA and uses to the east, funding sources outside of TIF. including East Naples Community Park Projects may also require additional vetting and 7" • Wetland, flooding, and site preparation piloting to better understand technical feasibility, considerations for development impacts, and broader County implementation • Roadway improvements to meet County priorities prior to approval for implementation. To this engineering standards end, planned projects include technical feasibility • Neighborhood Complete Streets studies and pilot projects. As a result, this capital and ; non-capital funding plan is subject to change as it is re- 5.0.6 Prioritization & Funding evaluated. Additionally, the Plan sets a framework based on current conditions but allows for flexibility in The Redevelopment Area Plan includes a prioritization phasing of projects based on funding opportunities plan recommending projects for the period through and community priorities identified in annual work 2030 (11 years after the adoption of the amended plans and capital improvement project lists. Plan), the period for which tax increment financing Figures 5-ES-2 and 5-ES-3 summarize the expenditure (TIF) funding will be available.The remaining project breakdown by timeframe and type of project/ recommendations are included for longer term initiative. Note that non capital projects include implementation post-2030 and will require alternative studies, plans, and grant programs. Table 5-ES-2 funding sources aside from TIF. The Plan provides an compares projected TIF revenues and costs(note that overview of potential alternative funding sources. some projects are programmed at a deficit because Table 5-ES-1 summarizes projected revenues through other funding partners or sources are anticipated, 2030 for various funding sources currently operating including after 2030 when TIF revenues will cease). in the CRA area, including Municipal Service Taxing Table 5-ES-3 shows CRA project costs that may also be Units (MSTUs) that are potential funding sources eligible for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds, independent of TIF (dependent on coordination with indicating the potential benefit from MSTU and approval from the respective MSTU advisory coordination. boards). Note that the MSTUs do not have a sunset Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-E-10 9 A 5.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 5-ES-1:Revenue Projection Summary Short-Term Total SAiiiiRovingl Fund Revenue f (1-11 Years) �, Tax Increment Financing(TIF) $33,790,000 $0 Bayshore Beautification MSTU $20,193,000 TBD Haldeman Creek MSTU $1,762,000 TBD Note: 'The TIF funding will sunset in 2030, so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. The MSTUs do not have a sun- set date and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the purposes of this planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. Figure 5-ES-2:Short-term costs by project type Land Use & Urban Public Space, Parks, & Open Space, Design, $165,000, 0% $1,050,000, 3% Development, $1,000,000, 3% Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability, $6,759,785, 20% Non-Capital, $21,881,116 , Infrastructure, 64% $3,525,695, 10% Total Short-Term Costs(1-11 Years): $34.4 million 5-E-11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9A ,.Q EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure 5-ES-3:Long-term project costs by type Public Space, Parks, & Open Space, Land Use & $3,144,404, 4% Urban Design, Development, Non Capital, $37,500, 0% $4,062,500, 5% $6,735,000 , 8% • anti Infrastructure, $25,909,865, 30% Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability, $45,170,047, 53% Total Long-Term Costs(After 11 Years): $85.1 million Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-E-12 5.0 9A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 5-ES-2:Summary of CRA Project Costs and Projected TIF Revenues 'I..— Short-Term Long-Term TIF Funding Summary Total Overall (1-11 Years) (After 11 Years)1 Total Capital Costs -North of US 41 (Triangle) $44,945,859 $4,709,998 $40,235,861 Total Capital Costs-South of US 41(Bayshore) $45,878,936 $7,790,481 $38,088,455 Total Capital Costs $90,824,795 $12,500,480 $78,324,316 Total Non-Capital Costs $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 Total TIF Revenue $33,790,000 $33,790,000 $0 Difference -$85,650,911 -$591,595 -$85,059,316 Notes:revenues rounded to thousands 'Overall costs increased by 25%to account for annual increases. The TIF funding will sunset in 2030,so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. Table S-ES-3:Summary of MSTU-Eligible Costs and Projected MSTU Revenues MSTU Funding Summary Total Overall Short Term � �..�� (1-11 Years) m 411 Total Capital Costs-MSTU-Eligible Projects $14,261,958 $4,121,297 $10,140,660 Total Right-of-Way MSTU Revenue2 $20,193,000 $20,193,000 TBD Difference $5,931,042 $16,071,703 -$10,140,660 Note:Projects are considered MSTU-eligible based on those that align with accepted uses of Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds accord- ing to Ordinance No.2013-68;revenues rounded to thousands 'Overall costs increased by 25%to account for annual increases 2The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030.However,for the purposes of this planning effort,no projec- tions have been made for years after 2030. 5-E-13 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5.0 5.0.7 2000 & 2019 Plan Comparison Table 5-ES-4 assists in comparing the 2000 Plan to the amended Redevelopment Area Plan, showing a status update for the various areas and initiatives identified for Tax Increment Finance (TIF) funding in the 2000 Plan, as well as how the Redevelopment Area Plan update responds to the identified initiatives. Note that two additional redevelopment sites, Naples Plaza and Naples Steel, were identified for private redevelopment without TIF assistance (now Naples Bay Club/Cottages at Naples Bay Resort and Woodspring Suites, respectively). While the 2000 Plan has a strong orientation around these sites and initiatives, the updated Redevelopment Area Plan is oriented around general themes of: Land Use and Urban Design; Public Space, Parks, & Open Space; Development;Transportation, Connectivity, &Walkability; Infrastructure; and Process.As a result, the amended Redevelopment Plan contains additional considerations that may not stem directly from the 2000 Plan, including but not limited to: • A focus on the CRA-owned 17-Acre Site west of Sugden Regional Park for catalyst redevelopment • A focus on arts and culture in the CRA area redevelopment vision • Connections to nearby parks ° • Land use transitions between incompatible uses and densities/intensities • More comprehensive infrastructure improvements Table S-ES-4:Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan 2000 Plan Projects Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Catalyst Redevelopment Projects Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements Triangle-Hotel/ Parcel at apex currently vacant;CRA-owned (primarily roadway, infrastructure,and land use Restaurant/ property under contract for sale and transitions)and incentives identified that are generally supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Office received PUD zoning for Mixed-Use project. Sections 5.3.2,5.3.4,5.3.5,and 5.3.6);general development support is also funded in the non-capital ..,.. projects(see Section 5.4) Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements a: (primarily roadway, infrastructure,and land use Triangle—Flex , Current mix of commercial and industrial transitions)and incentives identified that are generally Office/ uses. supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Warehouse Sections 5.3.2,5.3.4,5.3.5,and 5.3.6);general development support is also funded in the non-capital , projects(see Section 5.4) ,. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 �' 5-E-14 5.0 9 A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 5-ES-4(continued):Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan 2000 Plan Projects Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Catalyst Redevelopment Projects(Continued) Identified as an opportunity for new tenancy in Gulfgate Plaza currently has tenants;consideration needs to be given to type of establishments second floor space and to incentivize optimal Town Center tenant mix and walkable design;Courthouse desired for this space.A small business incubator (Gulfgate Plaza) might be a good use for vacant office on second Shadows is another large commercial space providing a redevelopment opportunity(Section floor. 5.3.4) Three60 Market has been established west of Recommendations made to evaluate LDC Entertainment bridge and south of creek;food truck park recently Center opened on north side of creek under same changes to facilitate commercial development such as that in the Bayshore area (Section (Haldeman ownership as Three60 Market. Need for 5.3.4);commercial parking solutions explored Creek) commercial parking has emerged as an issue in this area. (Section 5.3.5,Section 5.4) Neighborhood Focus Initiatives CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood Focus Initiatives. Neighborhood enhancement focused on structural upgrades, The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: limiting uses incompatible with the • New general housing and affordable housing • Rehabilitation of affordable housing redevelopment vision,transitions between • Neighborhood gateway features uses/intensities, infill development on vacant • Traffic calming by closing part of Linwood lots,addressing flooding/drainage,and • Extension of Pelton Ave to Linwood for complete streets/transportation improvements improved internal circulation that will address streetscape elements such as Shadowlawn Current status: lighting and traffic calming.These The Shadowlawn improvements delayed due to improvements will likely require strategic recession,warranting prioritization of current property acquisition and demolition of study and improvement implementation approach structures for redevelopment. Other relevant for area. However,some stormwater planning and initiatives include gateway design and improvements completed for area (see General coordination with County sheriff,code Infrastructure Improvements section below). enforcement,and housing agencies to address quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See section 5.3 for more information. 5-E-15 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9A50 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 5-ES-4:Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan * 2000 PIarr Iv ��,� Status ; Neighborhood Focus Initiatives(Continued) The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood r • Landscaping and beautification along Focus Initiatives. Redevelopment focus for this Bayshore Drive neighborhood split into North and South. North focus: • New affordable housing commercial/catalyst site development, parking,arts • Rehabilitation of market-rate and and culture,transition between residential and ° affordable housing • Botanical Gardens relocation commercial, residential infill,comprehensive street • Design of new neighborhood park and improvements that will address elements such as connection to Sugden Park site streetlighting and traffic calming, park connections • Sabal Bay development(pending legal (Sugden Regional Park).South focus:residential actions) upgrades and affordability, residential infill, park access .' Bayshore (East Naples Community Park, Bayview Park),wetlands/ Current related efforts include: • Beautification and roadway flooding considerations, roadway standards.These improvements planned for Hamilton Ave improvements will likely require strategic property and Thomasson Dr,funded by the acquisition and demolition of structures for Bayshore Beautification MSTU. Y redevelopment. Other relevant initiatives include • Additional stormwater planning and additional street/transportation improvements to improvements completed for area (see p p ° General Infrastructure Improvements address elements such as lighting and traffic calming, section below). as well as coordination with County sheriff,code • Residential units have been built; enforcement,and housing agencies to address quality substandard housing has been and supply of housing and streetlighting.See Section demolished. 5.3 for more information. a � • Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-E-16 5 9 A •0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 5-ES-4(continued):Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan 2000 Plan �� ,- k Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Updi ``Response Projects General Infrastructure Improvements :,,„,°`` Need for stormwater improvements identified y� for entire CRA area,so planning and a : improvement efforts have included both :, Triangle and Bayshore neighborhoods, % . Triangle g including the following: Recommendation made to update stormwater stormwater • stormwater plan created for Gateway management plan for the entire CRA area (Section Management Triangle residential area in 2009 and for 5.3.6) Plan Bayshore MSTU area in 2011. .' • Karen Dr stormwater improvements completed in 2017. • Pineland Ave stormwater improvements �� completed. Last major dredging project was in 2006. A„ , Depth assessment will be conducted for creek, Haldeman and capital reserves currently being Recommendation made to coordinate the capital Creek and accumulated for future maintenance or improvements of the MSTUs, including that used to dredge efforts.Advisory Board voted to Canal System increase millage rate to create dredging plan maintain Haldeman Creek, in a Capital Improvements Dredging Plan when major dredge will be needed;the Plan(Section 5.3.7). millage increase to 1 mil was approved at the final budget hearing on September 20,2018. Roadway Improvements y. US 41 Zoning Resurfacing and certain safety improvements Recommendation to coordinate on future Overlay and currently programmed in FDOT Transportation improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a Improvement Program. community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets Landscaping pimprovements along this corridor(see Section 5.3.5). , Davis Boulevard Resurfacing project beginning as part of FDOT Recommendation to coordinate on future improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a Streetlighting Transportation Improvement Program community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets and Zoning projects. improvements along this corridor(see Section 5.3.5). Overlay 4'. • Roundabout will be put in at Bayshore Recommendation included to make Complete Streets and Thomasson as a Bayshore comprehensive roadway improvements along Bayshore Bayshore Drive Beautification MSTU project. Drive and evaluate opportunity to underground ,, Landscaping • Bayshore Dr needs to be considered for streetscape and roadway updates via the overhead utilities(see Section 5.3.5,Section 5.3.6,and Bayshore Beautification MSTU. capital funding in Section 5.4). Other TIF-Funded Projects Botanical Gardens is now located southwest Specific planning tasks included for the 17-Acre Site of the Bayshore Drive/Thomasson Drive Botanical that highlight in particular connections to Sugden intersection.The CRA currently owns the Gardens Regional Park and a performance space(see Section 17.89-acre site("17-Acre Site")west of „_ �.. w� Support 5.3.4 and capital and non-capital improvements in Sugden Regional Park;the site is targeted for Section 5.4). catalyst development. 5-E-17 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 .,. .,., . . 9 A INTRODUCTION :. . , , , , . : , ..,,i„,„,„.,,,.„,s2.,.,.. , , , , . , . . , , ,, ,, : , , , , , „, , ,,, -,, ,,,,..,„„,:, : , ate. ..„,...,,_ ,,,,„„ ,„ , . ,,, „,„. ,,,,,,,,, .„...., _, . ,..• ,,, ,:,,,,:,„,„ „.. ,, :„.., .,, , . : ,... „• ,,,,,„,„„,.. t,. ..,: ,..... .„„ , ... „ ..„„ ,,, , ,! , L , ,.,.,..„. : ..,„ .„,,,,,..:::_ ,. .„,,,,,,,•,,,,,,, , . . sY , , „. . .„ . , , , ,,, , , , ...,,,, ,. . ...: ,, . , t' iti,,, ,,.,,,,, „., -7-,,,,„' .";'64440 i , ,, : . . , . ,, . . ,., t , ,,,,,,,,,... . .,....,..., . i ;',,E, ,,.,,I NA -; 71•'',-.:r ' -:.. . ... ,::::,...',::., a 4 ' ~ �_� +< J .:K:.•qf �}* • • M.R•x rJ;• `r '" .a/'. s 'r1 W ar'. ' Y' ' T. at f .. J rt? r Y. ,t.. ' „ •,.o►W;,g ...._ fi qi, ,,yam., `,7 i .,u�,. d ws� l x •�'� as - , _ ,,m^�^• s x. `,y,fie",_ T. ✓ga �„o i.''.�.. 5 • 1 r + - ..• ..� Y..^'-` s�-'.... i'.�. ..ai Vie..-''..t BK�,' '. -�" 5.1 INTRODUCTION 9 A . .1 .1 Vision 5.1 .2 Process The 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan provides an The technical analysis involved in the Redevelopment updated vision and approach for the redevelopment of Area Plan process included a review of the existing kry- gar" the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area in Collier plans related to the CRA area, as well as spatial and County(see Map 5-1-1). The Plan brings together quantitative analysis of data related to the CRA area. information gathered from technical analysis, The study team also conducted fieldwork to collect fieldwork observation, and public and agency outreach additional information and "ground-truth" findings in (documented in further detail in a separate the data. The public and agency outreach consisted of Assessment Memo). From these efforts and the stakeholder and agency meetings and calls, two public resulting themes identified, an overarching vision workshops, and a boat tour of Haldeman Creek and emerged for the future of the CRA area: adjacent canal areas. Figure 5-1-1 illustrates the *a *aaaaaI**•#*S*******aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa* complete planning process. Promote quality of life and economic vitality with a 5.1 .3 Plan Organizatio mixed-income, urban, multi-modal community that welcomes visitors, The remaining sections of this Plan cover the following topics: cultivates the area's artistic and cultural identity, uplifts unique local destinations, and finds balance • Section 5.2: Background—historical overview of the CRA area, including the original 2000 CRA Plan with the natural environment. and status update ; • Section 5.3: Plan Framework& Elements— a•a a a a-a a a s..s..am*••*****-*'**•*'*••••***a a 0 0.a s'.. framework of goals, objectives, and strategies This vision provides the guidance for the overall related to redevelopment in the CRA area, with framework and projects laid out in this supporting information on existing conditions, Redevelopment Area Plan for furthering the opportunities, and approaches for carrying out revitalization of the CRA area.This Plan is meant to strategies provide a palette of options, generated by the • Section 5.4: Prioritization Plan—information on technical analysis,fieldwork observations, and public revenues; capital project funding and phasing; and and agency outreach, that the CRA can further planning, administrative, and regulatory initiatives - explore. Consequently, not all of these suggestions will • Section 5.5: General Requirements—information necessarily be carried through to full implementation. on additional regulatory requirements for the CRA Full implementation of framework strategies and Plan and conclusion projects will be based on further study of capacity, Estimates— technical feasibility, and public priorities. • Section 5.6: Tax Increment & MSTU provides methodology and underlying assumptions for tax increment and Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) revenues. 5-1-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 INTRODUCTION 5 1 _ - .... n 1 1I 9 A' AKIRK WOOD •-• DAVIS BLVD AVE cc NI 0 i LINWOOD AVE z 8 0-7 7 in ' t' < 0 cc"11---NssNs.1 1:474,7 et"7/1 _ . . tx, I - , 1 lAti 9,' i I I - .,..- 't±./• ....v - -•k( ..S'r BARRETT AVE a .:?'• 84 fro ocr lli, Lu 1/1///v D S-7,1/1) cc o v-, rc ' Sugden • I Regiona ' Park 'S• L..) 4 CitlitOf ; Nap/es , I THOMASSON DR LIJ > \ Z ' I t 0 KAREN DR Naples East Napleslr' Al, .-4',....--- Botanical Community - :.- .-. IL., ,Garden,,,, _ ' 44,,.."- 44; -:-.... ...IV,: . ,;1/ --,, Bayview i - ", `X' ' " si'' - , Park I k. CRA Bouridory . vki 1 _t,2. ..N.k; -"- •,),„ ,k/ ''',46, 11111 Collier County Government CenterANDREWS AVE City f Naples within CRA 1 ,* "'.'"h14e F' ' .''*ite -:._. 4v Park .C1)11:9'.Ate,..'..-'sa_ ' sk' ',lift - '' : v.ta ' :'--...•,,I., [—...]City of Naples ..... , ..iç, '- — — li,, :... . ...-• . :• 0 AP .e ..• ....:j-.4.11 'I:1. • • -:.', -amimommi......4,..... ._j... :;______,_;.;_y_i _1-- ,...1 --:;I, .7.-- ' - -- I, i - 4fd I ;1,, .q,--,,y., - - :44, qf.:-Aii, 1Ate, ...,.. ,,. ifr -'-'"",,,iii.-: :',14 .... '*:_ Map 5-1-1:Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Study Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Are Plan—May 2019 tee 5-1-2 r, 9 A 5.1 ' INTRODUCTION ... `,•'ik:ks\ ,k':,,,‘‘,NV:Vg\sk,'NIss\sA‘4' PUBLIC INtsACAMEN I tyent No.of People. . 2 Public Workshops SO., , 1.., e ,s•,,, s •• • Feb-June 2018 5 Stakeholder . kkIlleNkkOs‘ 'Yksi'll‘ • 50 M . 1 VX'tshr;,•.‘41.4t.N,1*\" eetings e:tee\\tteAtZtr Assessment ;'‘' 4 Agency Meet mg, 20 '''N'''Y'''''''"Vk•s,Nnst" :s,' \s,',, \\A •\k,:l':,, * s<4**4,l',"•Z\tsZiVtA*111., ^,1'.A`"Iklzi., tt 6 Stakeholder 10 se,*•t*;14,4446.00,1iiiiii ',• ,, Interviews/Tours •\ •• : ‘ss,'•k ' • .,,,,,,, June-Sept 2018 Plan&Amendments Preparation i 0* Draft Updated CPA Par e . 1 clia Draft Comprehensive Plan&Toning Amendment Recommendations Comm4r,ty Forum :. • — , ee vve vke " * Oct 2018-Jan 2019 A X X\';,x\ .\,.. sss,, \,,• Plan&Amendments Approval ,,UPdakOqiik Plan Approval e , 'tomprettenehte Plan&Zoning Amendment Recommendations Review Figure 5-1-1:Planning Process 5-1-3 , Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A ... _ „ ��' m, ' „i . ' tyttt.yr it' P yc xu, .r. i 8< ' . t': '\he A t *,* i^° d a a %4 "d ".r<' *, a a , h ,,m 9 � ; li. ,„ ,, „„ • :"', 111.',r. 44..,, ,.41, of rz':;f�, � ,w`'z , f ,„ x?q,h „r tS` ,,,,,,,,:',!!,,,,,:,;,4,0 if,W4s,„„,,,,,5;,..4,010.-,<„;-,,,,,--. -4,,,,d k,,,.,,,,,Al,i(k1,111/4,,.t.,,,,,,,,,•0,,,,, ; i ,!,,N.:; '2,s.,,'44 . as" 1 " Ss !At. ,,a z.o, • ,Vi� x * � r a . a a 4 :, vn� fit ,o l .i ,r ' ?* p s p1, fi f. . ' si „. a w. A " F a .y {}.F � ' lye y M^,.. ev0 ?:„ / • 7 *.A1. %»F '1k R, P� .'AY If,R 4�ddd'''"" ,`UpN ry I' '5p'A4'' F• + y, N',2'W � •' 't.e ....a^. p d -E.a V. A'. "pit *Te.. i. V A. ,teen. §• v °� '�. � �;` � t ,gill t . i. gx& s '' a a 4#thy.{6 •, ,il ,, Ni # t 4. „ x , iz . ‘ qt `r ' '''''' i,:,',.,:r, ,,,,-Pliot, tt'.'''1,, tiP L *" • ` m# a . — K r .. 5 ■ 2 ,� y . ' . , 1' ," a . ^ ' ryam, 5.2 BACKGROUND Ai 9 A .2. Cr eation eation of the CRA CRA area. ,„ In addition to the Land Use Plan,the 2000 Plan Areaprovided an Urban Design Framework to illustrate the following: The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area is located 1. Primary areas anticipated to undergo significant '`'''iit, primarily in unincorporated Collier County to the change via redevelopment or infill development, southeast of the city of Naples (a small portion of the receive improvements via neighborhood area is in the city of Naples; see Map 5-1-1). It is near the popular destinations of Downtown Naples and improvement strategies, or remain as stable and planned development areas coastal beaches and is bisected by US 41, a major regional thoroughfare.This corridor defines two major 2. Basic site design conditions recommended to a sub-areas within the larger CRA boundary--the implement the vision defined in the public ii :: Gateway Triangle community north of US 41 and the outreach process il Bayshore community south of US 41 (see Map 5-1-1 3. Primary corridors and areas recommended for for CRA area and Resolution 2000-82, Exhibit A at end landscape/streetscape improvements in support of this document for a legal description of the CRA of the vision defined in the public outreach boundary). The primary areas anticipated to undergo significant � The CRA was created in 2000 under the jurisdiction of change included: Collier County to facilitate the physical and economic revitalization and enhancement of the community. Its • Triangle area approximately defined by US 41, creation was based on documenting conditions of Davis Blvd, and a line based on the projected blight in a Finding of Necessity study, as required by alignment of Pine St to the north of US 41 Florida Statute 163.340.Table 5-2-1 provides an • Naples Plaza (southwest of Davis Blvd and US 41 overview of the findings. intersection) and adjacent properties • Gulfgate Plaza as a Town Center z • Commercial uses on Naples Steel properties 5.2.2 2000 Plan Goals and (along US 41) and other properties on Gulfgate jests • Residential uses south and west of Gulfgate The 2000 Plan laid out visual concept goals and • Infill: corresponding redevelopment projects to improve • Multi-and single-family residential in �w; conditions in the CRA area.The projects were planned Shadowlawn neighborhood out inphases over a 20-year time span. Map5-2-1 • Commercial uses for Haldeman Creek Y P shows the overall Land Use Plan illustrating general entertainment center land uses and significant activity centers.The Land Use • Mixed multi-family and commercial uses Plan suggested a basic regulatory framework that along Bayshore Drive north of Lake View would guide Future Land Use Map and zoning (Lakeview) Dr amendments to support the redevelopment of the • Residential and commercial at Bay Center „aa 5-2-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 a A BACKGROUND 5.2 Main Issue Sub-Issue Specific Locations Mentioned Inadequate street layout and • Shadowlawn Dr design (including sub-standard • Thomasson Dr street widths) • Most local streets • Davis Blvd • Commercial parking problems Airport Rd • Bayshore Rd • US 41 Predominance of defective or • Major arterials inadequate street layout Lack of streetlights along major • Most local streets arterial and most local streets • Davis Blvd • Shadowlawn Dr Lack of sidewalks • Bayshore Rd south of Thomasson Rd • Most local streets Lack of neighborhood connections • Residential neighborhoods • US 41 Commercial lots • Davis Blvd Faulty lot layout in relation to size, • Between Pine St and US 41 adequacy, accessibility, or Built density far below approved • RMF-6 residences in Gateway usefulness density Triangle area Not meeting lot standards in at • RMF-6 residential properties least one respect • Bayshore area residences Disproportionate lack of plumbing Unsanitary or unsafe conditions Disproportionate overcrowding 2 unsafe structures Lack of sidewalks and streetlights Poor drainage of local roads, Deterioration of site or other surface water management improvements problems Lack of right-of-way for improvements along Shadowlawn Dr No public transportation provided Other problems in CRA area Housing affordability noted as an issue in the county and as an issue that could get worse in the CRA area Table 5-2-1:Findings of Blighted Conditions in CRA Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-2-2 9 A 5.2 BACKGROUND • area (Bayshore and Thomasson) with business logogram (representative sign or • Other opportunities in the Medium character) suppressed to design of sign's Intensity residential area of Land Use Plan background and surrounding landscape planting The public outreach of the 2000 Plan defined the • Pathways—representing sidewalk set back from establishment of a Neighborhood Focus Initiative as a curb by distance greater than width of walk and programmatic objective.The aim of such a program with planting materials and low pedestrian was "to coordinate the direction of a variety of public lighting provided between walk and curb and quasi-public services to enhance major residential • On Street Parking—representing street with portions of the project area."The primary narrow planted median and use of angle parking neighborhoods for improvements specified in the interspersed with planting areas on both sides of 2000 Plan included: street • Bayshore • Landscaping—representing street with • Shadowlawn landscaped median and landscaping and decorative lighting fixtures on edges The primary areas for stability and planned development with low-intensity residential included: • Public Spaces—representing pedestrian area with palms and large pool with water jet fountain • Windstar • Sabal Bay(Hamilton Bay) development In terms of landscape and streetscape improvements, the design framework focused on: �,. g Site design standards included: • Treatments for major roadways, including: • Roof patterns reflective of Old Florida • architectural style Davis Blvd • • Placement of buildings close to street to support Airport Pulling Rd pedestrian activity • US 41 • Use of rectilinear block pattern to strengthen • Bayshore Dr predominant established character of area • Thomasson Dr • Placement of parking to rear of development sites Significant gateway intersection designs at The following lays out items covered by the visual intersections of the above streets as well as: preference statement from the public outreach effort • Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis and North of US 41 of the 2000 Plan, which supported the design standards: • Linwood Ave at Airport Pulling Rd • Buildings—representing an "Old Florida" or • Pelton Ave north of US 41 "Cracker" style with covered porches, metal roof, • Intersection proposed at time of Sabal Bay's main and dormers east/west street with Bayshore Dr • Signage—representing low, monument-style sign 5-2-3 • Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A BACKGROUND 5.2 &---15-711,-,AE-i' i- -----z-ffY [ --- ; 1-7;111) ,.if Tetamaen i i L lr'—''- -1 .. -- i';:-"k,*..,--- .. - , 1 (31/1* ' •- ',... '1 Shadowlawn Reel-,)%Kellopmcoust_ i elworotio —,.. •:',:`,. r It•J '''-- 1 Neighborhood @tUtet7 ... _,......_ ...... . ___.......... _ . .. ........_... .,,.xt; Collier County Commission Ji r:' . 4: Colter Catifity Planning Department . , ,, ., I ,,,, .,,,,; ...li ,i.. ..:.1 ,..,._._. ____L„..._,., J • I '''. , _,_..7 ,1C,,,t,'.ktili_ 1 ILLUSTRAVON VW LI 1 ir '''4N\ .,',„ ' • fo.-„,).,,,,I :4 - 111`4•7;,,i tikrita,„., . - '1" './.,':.:-.41:1 Revelopment Plan 14...... ..2,.- ,..., - ...... ,7...i, :., , 2-.....:-.zi • it-17-a-,i.',-_:_'.1.-,..„!!...,N• .., . .: ' . - ...- . 1 , . . Town Con m..-/Piode -,Nit,, •- 'N!'..' r *I I ,--..,, , , s -, u,. lovvelopment . Naples '- 14, . ,...., -k--.....44-t Activity Centers , . , - '' r Steel Site ..- i ,,. i -- T----4-41 , '.,...„,, ) ..-- , if c.,..: 7- -., ,=..7-*-----, (-Ili,...) it-Ir:_11), • ,:.2 ;!,, ........._- ,_.. ,., ;;--- ,..-, Regional MaJci Moderate --...19 ., f .---4 .- Waldo-matt if \ Town Center C melt p i ' .^, Bayshore \k Comrneratal •) . Neighborhood .l i Entertainment I ,..,,v.4*ii,v4 .... ..„ ...: odwinw 0,0,14117 COrrrne"Cifd I' . , , '/7i ,. 123 ' . Mixed live 1-fotal; Commettier, s','i‘''4,::1 Windstar " Ji' `',1 . .,. iksoi Waal Warehouse LF , 'Av,leli irthcs4 alti jeA;Pt i: LiLmril ' -; i ._ 4.,',7,tg Medium intensity (----- —-- e •- L:- 4'.4 Reeldanara ..et,..i.e..!!, ....... 1 '' ----, :14 ' ir-7, - fib- cp Low Irnerely 1 Realdentat 41a,Ortarrf Botanical Garden; L, - it4M; Avalon Lake Pert r r Bayshore;. . Neighborhood III Government ?. t Mee --.1 Sabal Bay ii, % - 1114 .... ni...m.,.............. ,, r tivolluriook 10.00.1 .............-....- ''' Mop 5-2-1:Land Use Plan from 2000 CRA Plan Note:Additional labels have been added to clarify location of certain sites and neighborhoods. I": ..,, Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-2-4 5.2 9A BACKGROUND Table 5-2-2 provides a status update for the various areas and initiatives identified for Tax Increment Finance (TIF) funding in the 2000 Plan, as well as how the Redevelopment Area Plan update responds to the identified initiatives. Note that two additional redevelopment sites, Naples Plaza and Naples Steel, were identified for private redevelopment without TIF assistance (now Naples Bay Club/Cottages at Naples Bay Resort and Woodspring Suites, respectively). While the 2000 Plan has a strong orientation around these sites and initiatives, the updated Redevelopment Area Plan is oriented around general themes of: Land Use and Urban Design; Public Space, Parks, &Open Space; Development;Transportation, Connectivity, &Walkability; Infrastructure; and Process. As a result, the updated Redevelopment Plan contains additional considerations that may not stem directly from the 2000 Plan, including but not limited to: • A focus on the CRA-owned 17-Acre Site west of Sugden Regional Park for catalyst redevelopment xr • A focus on arts and culture in the CRA redevelopment vision • Connections to nearby parks • Land use transitions between incompatible uses and densities/intensities • More comprehensive infrastructure improvements 2000 Plan Projects Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Catalyst Redevelopment Projects Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements Triangle-Hotel/ Parcel at apex currently vacant;CRA-owned (primarily roadway, infrastructure,and land use Restaurant/ property under contract for sale and transitions)and incentives identified that are generally Office received PUD zoning for Mixed-Use project. supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Sections 5.3.2,5.3.4,5.3.5,and 5.3.6);general development support is also funded in the non-capital projects(see Section 5.4) �rn Specific planning tasks included for Mini Triangle and larger Triangle area with associated improvements Triangle—Flex (primarily roadway, infrastructure,and land use Office/ Current mix of commercial and industrial transitions)and incentives identified that are generally Warehouse uses. supported by the Redevelopment Area Plan (see Sections 5.3.2,5.3.4,5.3.5,and 5.3.6);general development support is also funded in the non-capital projects (see Section 5.4) Gulfgate Plaza currentlyhas tenants; Identified as an op portunity for new tenancy in second Town Center consideration needs to be given to type of floor space and to incentivize optimal tenant mix and establishments desired for this space.A walkable design;Courthouse Shadows is another large (Gulfgate Plaza) small business incubator might be a good commercial space providing a redevelopment use for vacant office on second floor. opportunity(Section 5.3.4) •``.,k` ,„,< Table 5-2-2:Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan • 5-2-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A BACKGROUND 5.2 2000 Plan Projects Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan UO Catalyst Redevelopment Projects(Continued) Three60 Market has been established west of Recommendations made to evaluate LDC Entertainment bridge and south of creek;food truck park recently changes to facilitate commercial development Center opened on north side of creek under same (Haldeman ownership as Three60 Market. Need for such as that in the Bayshore area (Section Creek) commercial parking has emerged as an issue in 5.3.4);commercial parking solutions explored this area. (Section 5.3.5,Section 5.4) Neighborhood Focus Initiative CRA will generally aim to continue these The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: Neighborhood Focus Initiatives. Neighborhood • New general housing and affordable housing enhancement focused on structural upgrades, • Rehabilitation of affordable housing limiting uses incompatible with the • Neighborhood gateway features redevelopment vision,transitions between uses/intensities,infill development on vacant • Traffic calming by closing part of Linwood lots,addressing flooding/drainage,and • Extension of Pelton Ave to Linwood for complete streets/transportation improvements Shadowlawn improved internal circulation that will address streetscape elements such as lighting and traffic calming.These improvements will likely require strategic Current status: property acquisition and demolition of The Shadowlawn improvements delayed due to structures for redevelopment.Other relevant recession,warranting prioritization of current initiatives include gateway design and study and improvement implementation approach coordination with County sheriff,code for area. However,some stormwater planning and enforcement,and housing agencies to address improvements completed for area (see General Infrastructure Improvements section below). quality and supply of housing and streetlighting. See section 5.3 for more information. Table 5-2-2(continued):Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan m�N Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-2-6 9 A 5.2 BACKGROUND Status v :.A y q. v� v� 4 en v ' \`w�v t V�, �v� m t Area Plan Update Response Neighborhood Focus Initiatives(Continued) The 2000 Plan initiative included the following: f • Landscaping and beautification along CRA will generally aim to continue these Neighborhood t Bayshore Drive Focus Initiatives. Redevelopment focus for this • New affordable housing neighborhood split into North and South. North focus: • Rehabilitation of market-rate and commercial/catalyst site development, parking, arts affordable housing and culture,transition between residential and • Botanical Gardens relocation commercial, residential infill,comprehensive street • Design of new neighborhood park and improvements that will address elements such as , connection to Sugden Park site streetlighting and traffic calming, park connections • Sabal Bay development(pending legal (Sugden Regional Park).South focus: residential ' actions) upgrades and affordability, residential infill, park access Bayshore (East Naples Community Park, Bayview Park),wetlands/ flooding considerations, roadway standards.These Current related efforts include: 1 improvements will likely require strategic property 4i` N • Beautification and roadway improvements planned for Hamilton Ave acquisition and demolition of structures for iili and Thomasson Dr,funded by the redevelopment. Other relevant initiatives include Bayshore Beautification MSTU. additional street/transportation improvements to • Additional stormwater planning and address elements such as lighting and traffic calming, improvements completed for area (see as well as coordination with County sheriff,code General Infrastructure Improvements ( section below). enforcement,and housing agencies to address quality , Residential units have been built; and supply of housing and streetlighting.See Section ti! k substandard housing has been 5.3 for more information. demolished. Table 5-2-2(continued):Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan 5-2-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A- BACKGROUND 5.2 2000 Plan ,, Status 2019 Redevelopment Area Plan Update Response Projects General Infrastructure Improvements Need for stormwater improvements identified for entire CRA area,so planning and improvement efforts have included both Triangle and Bayshore neighborhoods, Triangle including the following: Stormwater • Stormwater plan created for Gateway Recommendation made to update stormwater Management Triangle residential area in 2009 and for management plan for the entire CRA area (Section Plan Bayshore MSTU area in 2011. 5.3.6) • Karen Dr stormwater improvements completed in 2017. • Pineland Ave stormwater improvements completed. Last major dredging project was in 2006. Depth assessment will be conducted for Haldeman creek,and capital reserves currently being Recommendation made to coordinate the capital Creek and accumulated for future maintenance or improvements of the MSTUs, including that used to dredge efforts.Advisory Board voted to Canal System increase millage rate to create dredging plan maintain Haldeman Creek, in a Capital Improvements Dredging Plan Plan (Section 5.3.7). when major dredge will be needed;the millage increase to 1 mil was approved at the final budget hearing on September 20, 2018. Roadway Improvements . Recommendation to coordinate on future US 41 Zoning Resurfacing and certain safety improvements improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a Overlay and currently programmed in FDOT community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets Landscaping Transportation Improvement Program. improvements along this corridor(see Section 5.3.5). Davis Boulevard Resurfacing project beginning as part of FDOT Recommendation to coordinate on future Streetlighting Transportation Improvement Program improvements with FDOT to develop and incorporate a community vision for comprehensive Complete Streets • and Zoning projects. improvements along this corridor(see Section 5.3.5). Overlay • Roundabout will be put in at Bayshore Recommendation included to make Complete Streets and Thomason as a Bayshore comprehensive roadway improvements along Bayshore �l Bayshore Drive Beautification MSTU project. Drive and evaluate opportunity to underground Landscaping • Bayshore Dr needs to be considered for streetscape and roadway updates via the overhead utilities(see Section 5.3.5,Section 5.3.6,and Bayshore Beautification MSTU. capital funding in Section 5.4). Other TIF-Funded Projects Botanical Gardens is now located southwest Specific planning tasks included for the 17-Acre Site of the Bayshore prive/Thomasson Drive Botanical that highlight in particular connections to Sugden Gardens intersection.The CRA currently owns the Regional Park and a performance space(see Section 17.89-acre site("17-Acre Site")west of Support 5.3.4 and capital and non-capital improvements in Sugden Regional Park;the site is targeted for � '�• catalyst development. Section 5.4). Table 5-2-2(continued):Status of Key Land Use Areas and Initiatives of the 2000 Plan tea,. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-2-8 5.2 BACKGROUND 9 A t°. Section 5.2.3 and Sections 5.3 and 5.4 provide more • Stimulating investment and capitalizing on information on these additional considerations and their development opportunities while also providing basis. support and protections for existing residents • Navigating various perceptions of and visions for the area and incorporating arts and culture into the 5.2.3 Bayshore Gatewayvision; marketing this vision �.: y Triangle CRA 2019 Perspective �! F k rF a. Many of the challenges and efforts identified in the 0{.u.�. r 2000 Plan are still relevant today. The following are some of the major ideas emerging from the ; + Redevelopment Area Plan update process,which 3 provided the basis for the goals, objectives, and strategies underlying the framework(see Section 5.3) Transition between higher-density multi family housing and lower-density single-family housing for this Redevelopment Area Plan: • Improving the compatibility of uses and appearance of the public realm �� -°g • Transitioning between suburban and urban ooe: , development style • Balancing regional vs. local transportation needs s ; Qy �x+ and related transportation safety concerns along major roadways; incorporating a focus on multi- . modal transportation • Developing in the context of natural conditions and hazards (wetlands, Coastal High Hazard Area, flooding), including how to address increased Artistic and cultural elements of the CRA area include murals density/intensity • Capitalizing on the valuable assets of the area or nearby, including parks, natural areas such as the canal system and Naples beaches, proximity to Downtown Naples, and tourism while also creating public spaces that can be claimed by the community x t 5-2-9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 „,.,.. 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK . a ELEMENTS „,,..,,,,„,s,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,, ,„:„,,,,,"....?i-.'"?.,Pli ,,.:,,:q:.. . ., , : .. ,gym. .. L' _ 7 7 ,, , .f!"+�F .,{ 4 ma :�° e ,'� ;•iii ':.. T}P .gyp, Y r b m w " • .01,04144- .\ . 'ava •!y � 4 44 awl • � �!' ..,kt, ,'v+. •.''s ^•1�"`Y�u...��R� y'� ■ 3 . .oi' . • r��l�llllll�l�� 'iC � ' $"tT*t4*,A''"u: 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9A This page is intentionally left blank. 5-3-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 M LA 8 06 %\ \ a., „,-• N w.N,.....\\NT"."-- 1 !-. r.� ' " =LLB 11111114\0 I\ II ' ;8 -Ili_ s�.'.� a w o `o o a — a a M � : m V a/ \ N 44 (sS 8g cc"L a 21_ fs 1* *CD N csa ' t a • 1 ioui� o�\ us:1PuleN \—� iJ � o� r) y45' V ' ■ t 00 ?{.,a< A;u,nuu„r� ao.N3 A � g > .. _ eafdeN 5$E3 \ " kr, So Liu S1' �y• '�4 j as NOSSVVUUH — ts 7.\% ' ' \\\‘•\\\\ '.4 \'.'-l'(:'4'44 i, 1 ' Nis, . i , , .t- ,4_,,, 1 ',' ..\-:, k \ - ..,.. -,•'.,1 I \v., . ,,,,,\ \ ""3AV.11d \ \\ \\ o\ to —, r I\ °°,�, v \w 1- tdr 1 4 • E it • I i �� ® Q \st Oi ` n a e7 A; �i, 1 4 �`Ik is • � � � t ��t g a t7 fi o E _ 1 n 1: t ;; 4 go �r f me sinus cfl n ,1; to 'C OW u-, t co al ` Na a W ✓ v N ,a ca0 � H > > a, oN a _u, N cc o TO v E F C o j = v m _u t. o Y v m . w 0 a a t, v a c y c a o o N m 2 a ' 7, r L' a F.. i; a v E .0 c v .si. °c ' .1.. , = w a, k+ E = E 5 > E E E o E ro m 3 c s E _a v '°' 2 -, 19 .� t,_ 3 a, y a C M a Oa Y L. a s ,v L 0) � 3 0 C) a, $ E a o w ;_ = v E Y v s cD E a a, « E ° 00 > ?i , o — 0 ., o s c Z O E .2 O 0 C Y ; U Q a� a, 0 co _ O Z L TN T` 03 oL_o m w 3 n o , ai «• 8 00 ,� 10 t i — _ E •▪ Cn L _ w E v a °�° c v °' v °i m a M a o o m v m 3 u > 'm n o 8S?• J0 > o a, a 10 c a o o v ° o , a .E o o a C F. 0 u ° o " a v `o E 9 A ,\ ,\ ,, ,i,„ ,,, E 0 u II I I w L,,t v NG O Y y• o n> c,- v G a w > c v m O a 0 v > L o O, O 3 O o m n n E w o - ' 3 sw>N aE •a a v 00Jm o c E0 .. _ N ° Al> • -Q 2 N 3 F` H -E -2m3 3 v° L., 2 Q 2 d c f > = d c a s oo o H a m L7, o 0 w ° a Eu a 1 I.0 o v v I Amy > v c cc.)1— aOOn arc c m , v c m a = a d Q ¢ ° v Z ' " mN ,, U EN0 NN O -O Va0 .0 N mm y ° ° � c a o < rE3 " ` ° u u a ` wv >- E 0 ° 22 CO mm> vEav n mo o3 -OE Nu uo j `o Nc ' F01 ° i w f+ > t oa n > o Z ac C 'tao ° 1 >a o 0 0 D r- D g � 0 co Hu ,, ,,, m ; ` CC o m m N 4/1 l < 3 x W •0 F. a) 2 op a m u c, u, u_ a a a 0,, 0 u, o & a on u 0 u, u: 0 a cou a co u0 u, 1 a m .o • To C7 m 3 ea o 5 s w CC c w v . M L I,'' 2 0 = E r'ijrn m I in ii iii ii a — 0 0 0 . kt: 01 0 CO 0 A / ti 0 Y N c > c a)_ N ? O_ N To a) c Q O g c u Z c cc W to (o M N H W b4 J ro co w O. .a 0 a, H Co cc a o 0 3 r w > 2 m 4 CC W CD Z_ Z Z Q J O. in; m m 9 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Non-Location Specific Capital Projects Project Type Project Name Public Space, Parks,&Open Space A. Pocket Park Land Acquisition&Development B. General Parks Improvements C. Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements Development A. Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust Transportation,Connectivity,& A. Sidewalk Gap Improvements Walkability B. Bicycle Infrastructure C. Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements D. General Multi-Modal Improvements Infrastructure A. Water Main and Fire Suppression Upgrades B. Stormwater Improvements C. Upgrade Sanitary Sewer Lines Non-Capital Projects • General market study/economic profile Projects and initiatives that are not capital • Bayshore Drive Complete Street technical investments include a variety of plans, studies, and feasibility grant programs in support of redevelopment or • Bayshore Drive Complete Streets pilot project capital project planning throughout the CRA area. These non-capital projects and initiatives include: • Triangle retention pond improvements CRA operating expenditures and administrative • Micro enterprise and arts incubator updates Grants and funding programs, including: Land Development Code updates • Residential improvements grants/loans Development support for catalyst development sites • Commercial façade improvements Master planning for: • Wall and fence funding for areas with • Stormwater improvements incompatible uses • Arts—and culture-oriented development and • Public art funding redevelopment efforts • Economic development incentives • Implementation of Complete Streets projects • Mobile home replacements • Community safety and clean-up • Community Land Trust housing construction • Branding • Other affordable/workforce housing investments • Marketing and communications Other non-capital expenditures that may arise in the • Water and fire infrastructure improvements future and are not yet identified Feasibility studies, including: Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-5 9 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Future Land Use Densities The following table shows Future Land Use densities corresponding to designations on the Concept Map (Figure 5-3-1). Note that certain projects in the Redevelopment Overlay are eligible for additional units from a pool of • 388; these units are referred to as "density pool units" below. Also note that the entire CRA area lies in the sr, Coastal High Hazard Area,which deducts one unit per gross acre (UPGA)from the eligible base density of four units per acre (UPA) and does not permit rezones for mobile home development. • 14ure. and Use Densities A. Mixed Use—Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Overlay Mixed Use Activity Center B. Residential—Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Overlay; 16 UPGA for area outside of • overlay 12 UPA via density pool units(with cap of 97 density pool units per project); limits apply for projects that do not comply with the requirements for this density increase.The Mini Triangle Catalyst Site is an exception with a maximum of 12 UPA and is not subject to the density pool unit requirements.Within this site,there is a Mini-Triangle Subdistrict that was approved through Ordinance No. 2018-23 which amended the Growth Redevelopment Overlay— Management Plan and Ordinance No. 2018-25 which amended the Land Development Properties with access to US 41 Code creating the Mini-Triangle MPUD to allow for construction of up to,with a mix to East/Bayshore Dr/Davis Blvd(84)/ be determined by maximum allowable traffic generation,the following development west side of Airport-Pulling Rdi plan: • 377 multi-family dwelling units • 228 hotel suites • 150 assisted living units • 200,000 square feet of commercial uses inclusive of 60,000 square feet of self- storage and 30,000 square feet of car dealership • Residential only:8 UPA via use of density bonus pool(with cap of 97 density pool units Redevelopment Overlay— per project). Eligibility requires that the project: Properties having frontage on 1.shall be a Planned Unit Development(PUD) one or more of Bayshore Drive, 2. shall be a minimum of 3 acres Davis Boulevard,Airport-Pulling 3.shall be redevelopment of a site Road (west side only)or US 41 4. consist of all market-rate units East2 Limits apply for projects that do not comply with the requirements for this density increase. Urban Residential Subdistrict Maximum residential density determined through Collier County's Density Rating System, but shall not exceed 16 UPA except in accordance with Transfers of (outside Redevelopment Overlay) Development Rights in the Land Development Code. p g P To facilitate hurricane evacuation and protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation designated area, residential densities within the Subdistrict shall not Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict exceed a maximum of 4 UPA,except as allowed in the Density Rating System to exceed 4 (outside of Redevelopment UPA through provision of Affordable Housing and Transfers of Development Rights,and Overlay) except as allowed by certain Future Land Use Element Policies under Objective 5 in the Growth Management Plan. New rezones to permit mobile home development within this Subdistrict are prohibited. Rezones are recommended to be in the form of a PUD. 'This definition is interpreted broadly to mean properties that can gain access to the road(s),whether directly(access point on the rood)or via one or more other roads;it is not viewed narrowly to mean have an access point onto the road(s).As a result,this definition encompasses all properties in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay except those on east side of Airport Road. According to Collier County Growth Management staff,such properties must literally have frontage on(abut)one or more of the specified roads. 5-3-6 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9A 5. PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 3 Urban Design The Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code (LDC) provide tools to shape land use and urban design, which have a direct impact on the built environment of an area. This section highlights existing conditions related to various land use types, as well as ways to promote a defined, harmonious,and urban visual and land use character tailored to the CRA area, cultivating its unique artistic and cultural identity. C) GOAL Promote a defined, harmonious, and urban visual and land use character tailored to the CRA area, cultivating its unique artistic and cultural identity. 4k 4 4 4.4 4 4 4 444 4 44 4 4***4 4*4 4*4 Q 4+4 4 4 4 4 h 4 6 4 R 4 ois :„. 111 ,gyp • • • . Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-7 ts 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Existing itesidential Land Use Characteristics The CRA area has 3,814, dwelling units according to Florida Department of Revenue 2017 data.These units include a l range of housing types from mobile to larger single-family to multi-family homes(see Map 5-3-2 and corresponding images).This diversity of types,when coupled with a range of price points,can accommodate a diversity of residents living in the community.Currently,streets such as Jeepers Drive(picture 3 below)show areas of transition between larger residential and smaller residential,as well as between smaller single-family residential and multi-family on nearby streets.The vision set forth in the Redevelopment Area Plan aims to guide these transitions towards the desired built environment character laid out for different sub-areas (see Section 5.3.8). 1 . 2 � ., ,�[ = �alFi �•� l'AitaliC - ) _ ' Ew caa i 'N- ev �.,,: °,`^ Mobile home Single-family housing 3 ,, 4 7._,.411 . - ,.... ,.. . ; .. „,..,...i., .,---,,,, ,‘,4,,,,Nt,,,_24.1K.\;X'' •4 z:')Ort*l‘i, (. 4: eat L• 1 pp i }��, r � `,.`1' , e „ -o '. _ M1 tennuq,i!!i,lli mii�a N..... ry q � '') ! ,". ,..xa.,.,us"" .mod`�.:�'�' Small single-family near large new single-family with guest house Gated community housing I 5 ' Atori • '1 � Al _ I ' ' "� I. . 3��1ti^ �y{: r ". Small multi-family housing Multi-family housing 5-3-8 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 a 9 Ai s''''',, PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 '''' te4 ?•1•• _..... I.,,,, •,..,......,„,,. ,, num • •••••Li , .111 II—FTFITT 1 11 rIfT.ITELImi N .. ' il '----- . ---1••••••,•••••DAVIS'BLVD.: --J-if•mei , "'"11-------"7"-- A ' iiimbni,m liiii];--11 1 ..,,!i!,;•,,,lai_ . . one ---1 RKWO OD AVE-••:::•.•L•LLLL 1„, '`,-,,,,... ' '' KI •:.,, ::"...•:!,:!:!,,„;:;.::A'• -.le loin •:'.."• •-,,,. ri ' 'um no.-----, „._ . • , .,,,.., . ..,„., ... 2 HI%7;---i i,-4-4,,-•- iiTii)4, / -- - , , lull• cal„:1 1 EWAN ."-.; ' 'T MAE 'u " ' .'',,, a. - I—ie,ii 0 ,IIIIIIII Min Ill a 0 apain 0_ ,- 4 .00 - .. "'ES ,ip;572. it. < 4i Lni Iiii•ollol•.....c.,_ ..:-••••••••.„ , , • '4(‘,„..'[4'...11 Lifil.—. , 1 I'm . . : El- _ • II :m- MN ,•-,,, ptirril : r', •,,4 11----- ' ----- --- il6i ' 10/- ETI_VIE ---, 1Fq-- . --, .11 --- 10 / 1 - I.!' : - '• .-----RI' --: "":21 i . '• '.:-::',/,' J , , ,..„.„. „.,,..., „.;1.:• :_ . .2.......,t: r ••• . .:.• ... , . ,,,,„ .. ,....„)...:?••• .. .,.., _ ..3„,,,t,,,,,vorrlill la] ' ..2.2 . , -p- . . -.1.::• ..j..,./.4:',1',-,r---'1 ,,. i'N<).t, I-- iii., •,•.:••• ••- • :- -,, '•!, • 5 ,c?,,7z- , . ,....:,-,,, 4,„,,,,...:....,-, Li-ya ,, , d„.._ . .. ..„. li .. •,._ AL -,..1 ,. --,14,,•, ,,,, r . ,, L.„.„..„,.....Li. ) i) ,A.--ti: i „.. , , ., ,....) , . . ...„,,, ,,.....„' ..,...'7'1'. r",..%'-'• .., — I IN ... ' y # 'I.&E'7"'"- -Mre''''''''-'...." ,k,.... • .MIL i 'i MU N'', ail BARRE,Eziy „ co•mi • ' :..,,.. ,:•:•=-..• ••;•-• ,R siumun .iiime ii Naa •,,,, 4,1 . . ,- • 111111mrimminifi-•,r.il I fill( 1.1,1 Li- FEligacc ••••••In on Liu L dA,..,,--- ,• 4,01,_4••••14,, a: ''.:'12"i4-.•-1' ''' 16s' 1.,',W8i'. iii n n i IIIIMM.... II Pl:.[4"1.14:„!..„,,-- 'A4• ' ' . '•,,. ;\ ..011_,...e.,-A, „.*e: •- '-'c'' , il '.''. .cne.'•••'"- - '... /111111111111111111111 , -mak_ . .:., , ".•',,l' = ' .4e. Sugden ....., - '•"---"--„,-vv/Af--,,,, „ kn . ...„ . ......„ 4 o : Regional - •••,.. \„. ,_ ‘, . . 0, 1 mim.A vo„„,,,,, „....„--- 3 ,,,, n 11,,,.131 Park '. •. .°- ., . \ ..5., (Er, ' ". .. . -2" - a , , . . .. ... ---„, .._...., ,-.-_-,... ,. 6 , ....„ II, , I , . ..,„...., ‘2..c. , .104 ziT':'•....-.::::,,, . •:L.•••....••:ll I 1 • I. .,,.„ , . :::s,,J./..e. -, 4 . THOMASSONDR - . 1 .,„• "......-.7. Ali,T7. •.k,\ :44,,Vii,•,:f.,;.•,••‘,.,• :111 li 0 L•4 ' iS,!!L ,-1'...•44.....:.7 , x*,110.,#4.V,., ..,„,,,•••:',..-.:f',.•,J.Ir.-,,,1, .,.4,411/1 J'''•-•-;,',14,...-.:.,, 1-0.. ,, '1 4.0 :,',••••70 pwiii v'pity.. •,, ....i,;,-i.0 . •*„ KAREN pp •••••:-,,ast Napl s ... ••'41::•Atff'..", / :LL1. - L•••••-•"' •Naples .7•.;• ..: ' .orn un ty - ------•-•---- --I .,,,, „„ '---,,, "-'-''''• -- a < '''''"' :ota,Ica!' , , . 7 -', •-.., '- ,.• '''''''Par ,-..4k. --- ...... -.';'--.. I4k?'.''.....:::".*.-..---.2.4:(• ---....-,..--..c •••,:,..,, •-•" . „.... ,, •-•1* .! , ;*"....-.,,,,,„ .1 1 IN m ONIGEDOIP 1 ,40,.. 4,-,,i,... ',..ea lin ri .....•,,,...:.:..:::,...--.•••: •:„1,.• Bayinew,.,....A smonmumi III \.:,11,10i1 •••! - • ,,--,::...;:7.;,". [7 Single Family Residential •,,,,,;,, . „- "•').if.e'•:.' ---- Park -.1 I. III IIIII MI6) .. '4 .-.7....--114". 4:f.: ....-::-:-.;17,-,1,-., Mobile Home 44 :;_ ---'''''.1 ... . .::-....4,.....;. 'Ls' rar".11:1`111:11.11111.111/mJ ji.....,...s......:.1(cH-i..7..;r. in.,Mp ulti-eFrtampilayrcReelsidontial I ' -:::::'''11..e'.7:-...4'('' .• ANDREWS.AVE'77:.- tkrE::-:..-1; Li r°P Y ,•,,-,,,,,f' .7':-..... •':'-':-;:l4e.---7.-- 1..u.: i,i7-,,Itk-- .. 0 CRA Boundary ••• L-• ,,...,k4•.:11:'::: Vi•--....•4f.(•.....-.:7 -... _,.• .Niimi nmilim 1 -,..04,.. ..,.......... .., . .::: .\\Ik'7." '''''' . 'A 111111311IMPUIT .:-.........::- .1H., pi park ....',,P. • - I RIM ;ki."-...)''''"W4e' ..., Wetlands - •-:::....., j f Naples :: . , , .. ,,,.„,..., ......„ ....„..---.„-:-.. --------• ani, iti .44(...f:.., L- •City , • ..... .,..„ ........ ...A...,:•:-.-............,,,g..--•••••_, .„.„.. . .... • ,. .......:as m AN Hi, I A I I I 115 g I 4 • ..„...,, 1.001u..... ..... •, mie.,>>..4-•;,,,,:..::::•,..:...E:2.4:f.!,,fr: .-:::‘,-•-• . s ],,,, !•,'•-•••-•..•. ••-•-•-•••• •'' '•••:-- P• ---• 7 • 2 --;,1 At• • I&•:•!).F-••••4•.7;••"••••44,•:•' •••.• ..,.1..:: ...•!. , .. 4., ••• !•.p, -•‘•• : ‘1,!,z• '.r.. ,..:L.:. .".;..........W',.4 :: .--,,,U, . ...t:..:':-7- LI-:'. )14'. ,..•:::"-,'• ---:::--..-i,....:.14.7 1 A 'ale1'• .- llejil--'-- '':-.)gr ''.::::4.77-:.4.4i.*,......:.:44,/. 4:4- -<4's- 'cw." :::•:::'7 A Map 5-3-2: Existing Residential Land Use Characteristics;Data source:2017 Florida Department of Revenue , ,,,o, ,,,, Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-May 2019 5_3_9 .1- 9 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS M M M*M M M M M M m w.w w re w M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M I.M M M M M M M M*M M M w a.. A Commercial& Industrial Land Use Characteristics As with housing types,there are a range of commercial types in the CRA area (see Map 5-3-3 and corresponding images). Many commercial sites include on-site,street-facing surface parking.The area contains two major mall-style commercial spaces,Gulfgate Plaza and Courthouse Shadows. Uses range from restaurants and retail stores to heavier uses such as auto services. Industrial uses are also present in the Triangle area and northwest of Sugden Park. 1 2 . to New neighborhood commercial on Bayshore Drive—Three60 Market Mall commercial—Gulfgate Plaza 3 4 -of ar Mall commercial—Courthouse Shadows Linwood Avenue commercial 5 ` ' t i ..�x�f •.\� 'ak 'ems\�...>=`�0.� .r _ , 1: . CCP Multi-story strip commercial Vertical mixed-use 5-3-10 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 84 WOOD AVE 5 Mill �j qI 41 LU Regional Park Vacant Non KAREN DR -Residential corninunity Industrial Botanical N r en Institutional Ba 7. NOF County State AVE J, Wetlands City of Naples Map 5-3-3: Commercial&Industrial Land Use Characteristics with Non-Residential Existing Land Use;Data source:2017 Florido Deportment cfReve- nue Bayshone Gateway Triangle[RA Area Plan—May 2O19 � 5-3-1I � 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A ,,,:., ..,, $ I CY 1.,1 L3i1I.ONS ass•waO:V&V***<kus•.naw•.a•w•«.s•..•o sw•.•00..4,0e.w,o �•� Existing Community-Oriented Uses Community-oriented uses support community-building and provide services via government,faith-based, non-profit, and other entities.The Redevelopment Area Plan aims to preserve and enhance these uses.Government establishments in the area include the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area office,a Naples Fire Rescue station,and the County Center(see Map 5-3-4 and corresponding images).Schools in and near the area include Avalon Elementary, Shadowlawn Elementary,and The Garden School of Naples(a Montessori school).There are also various arts-oriented spaces, places of worship,and non-profit service providers. Evaluating locations for a library or other public meeting space can also facilitate the addition of community services and spaces. 1 ' 2 A s "' .0 a.....::':', • t • X )tp I.L J :':',f,' ii : _ • , Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Office Avalon Elementary School , , 4 3 w. r � , JUCJY&JOHN :�4 �r< SON 3 ,l ... - o U �c� Sys A Opera Ai kNaples East Naples Baptist Church 6 6 r✓x..., , 4. . LL//{{ k, 1I .I. ,, 4, 3 P+ F _+ .�,— , t ��". F CH Yea !� T •. Coins ,,� t d - •• ,-4e1fi liF Greater Naples Fire Rescue—Station#22 Catholic Charities Lx 5-3-12 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A,, PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 -„ I N Illi 011110111 DAVIS BL ' In •-• ,.• ,........„„-,... s••••(-; MOM!NUPE! I 1 A Vr ‘•N-, KIRKWp D A E - 4 `- or il° 1111 - a' • I , '1•,,‘, LIN OOD AVE. ..,„ NI .. °I 4. i i ,,. i itll Nig - • , , ,,,,„. ,..i ,,,, .....: • I_, , .„ , ,,,,,,,,,,,,, . )...,...,,,A.:-... ,..„.„44,.,...,...„,„ ,„.„ ....... •, , , ,::: ...,...,....• . ..,...:.....,..„ -a- ... . :,,',,,,,,,,,. .„..,. 1,..:;:-.1...".-... -•''7::Ali,;...."' cc li.i..; — ..... ---..i.i.,..,.% „,. s• ` - :. BARRE IT AVE ....... _ .. '7''.".1,',7, I 11111111111111.1 ,„. ji;:::- ., A :'4 0 I ',Vr :he,"'77-)...Y''l LI:J '77-- ,"4Y , -, "ICC .,, ' 1, CC 111/140, >_,.n1111111111 4 ,'!•.' Sugden as ..)7-4„.? < Regional -,- _ t- 4•1-, -... `1 ''' Park •i,, ,,,P'• ..-7, ,..,, ,,c . ..... iu, . .... ;;,' 1 _ .., . „..,.11; i - -•'5314; ,-;'•'',11'l_; -1 HiOMASSON DR ...4,.. II .• \ Z 0 KAREN DR ''-'-'-'‘ 1 1 vacant Non-Residential -.,•".'.'“...'t.,31".e. . 7-0:n -17-1•- Naples East Naples 1 -:::•;.;.."".:.:::;:- • --• • e .... L5ommunity,•-• ...commercial tt:C7-'..-',,... Botanical — im.P industrial ,`• ark •.. • ••,,)ti,,,i...::„. .,,Garden 1' ..',7 . IIII Institutional .tee. I ' •,)::-.:silg.- ,-...u,, •:•4:1. • •"..-7,-,, Naples Botanical Garden BaY,V„te4,-.:,...l, IIII II lf...".... '--.. .. ......_:--.-,.•. rl' .r., ..,„ ,_ Park .1, ::•'•-• - - II county ..... 1, ••4 I II almr- ''YY ''. '"7'llt!..-/: '?e••T--. ?••4-: '''''41':9.' -. '''•'?'''. '.! =State i... -ji;'.:j•;..2. ' -..: sir, .".:',4:2'.'.';',.::''" '''''.f.'',;.!1'. ...::::. , ', ..-.,1. ...;. Naples._ ! '' -T. . ANDREVVS AVE':;11....:.ct4.......---::'1 l ,i utility/other '4-••,' ':-.-:l.',..;•.i . • -•'''..•-,.',-.:.•-..v.14:7-....- .:::',. ...,. ::. db. ....,3„...,...:14: ?Ii.4;- '.: [3 CRA Boundary .. • ' . . . 54?;''''s..* -: '1'... d" 4.. ..- .,,Ik....::......•-44ee, '.!•:• ../.ske::'... •,li- •i, -• 5 :i Wetlands - - ,••.. ..., , .... -- ,,i•••• --- •i':•:•l',,,, -.''..,i,••••• •4- -*--- I-----/•-•"4- ": ` i."'..-. 4: ' . -j...1.,,•"""....: ,.*,....7.-. City st Naples • r "4',„ `,1'.:. ..'''',./-•''.''' j',-- ..:;.' .;,.1.,:-..,4;....d IP ':.C-...z,lc,:.... ,,te,.:.. ' ....::"st.,,•'.+: .•.14-. \''''— '- .j.... '''' ..... b'"'''''-- '""•''... — •,t+7'''•''••••••:::'...7'7.•-s.),I.u. '..'•'.•••..•-•::!:-.:,• r, .r..'. ' Map 5-3-4: Community Oriented Land Use Characteristics with Non-Residential Existing Land Use;Data source:2017 Florida Department of Revenue Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 , 5-3-13 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A Objective 1: Promote urban-style development. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Growth Management and Zoning Divisions to pilot innovative land use and zoning approaches to promote more urban-style development in the LDC.These approaches might include: • Increasing mixed use designations • Focus increased densities/intensities along improved roadways (with consideration of Coastal High Hazard Area restrictions) • Roadway design standards to support multi-modal transportation (see Section 5.3.5) • Reduced building setbacks • Zoning for live/work spaces • Zoning and incentives for accessory dwelling units • Flexible parking regulations • Strategy 2: In awarding density pool units, establish eligibility requirements and/or performance metrics that promote these urban approaches. 5-3-14 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 ..0 Character 0.* 00.00....«.«.««.*.....«..*.....*.*......o..*... ADDITIONAL INFORMATION $..kta' es a� y ?. '..' ''''''A : . ,,,:.'r",,, , p p 'i fi G pia . k�ap ... 8 i' # 1. � y. 1. • yx Naples.Beach and Bay Bealty II. I I. :F p Fj®wry f. �� i:ij .t, . ....i i; ,..-" :. III - -: :. ':;::''''''':: IT4' iallOW 411 *7'1 ,,.,,..",. Local Mix Use 4i` _ **� t* * I.R , 5 41 • •�f :e+! ref > N 1 } i ' -' , I *era, �� : em. aa�� .p,, :4•. `.� k ,..i" -- ....11G`�'`.\y��L \ jai ttn. % .. .t %.lL A .f ,4 d vw3 >a t :.. + • ss .. i 3 • i 3j T9 m . wo'nm` w ! Promote use of guest houses(shown here in back of main house)as a way to provide additional density and potentially address Local multi-family housing styles affordability Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-15 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A Objective 2: Achieve consistent land uses in the CRA area and sub-areas. • Strategy 1: Use sub-area ("Character Area") characteristics (see Section 5.3.8)to guide land use vision in the CRA area. • Strategy 2:Amend the LDC to limit heavy commercial and manufacturing/warehouse/storage uses throughout the CRA area; evaluate incentives to encourage transitions away from heavy commercial and manufacturing/warehouse/storage uses. • Strategy 3: Identify elements in the LDC to create clear transitional areas and land use buffers between uses that are incompatible (see Figure 5-3-2); coordinate buffers with related improvements, such as landscaping improvements via the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. • Strategy 4: Provide funding through CRA-funded grant programs for transitional structures (e.g., walls and fences) between incompatible uses. Provide guidance in the program guidelines to coordinate with related elements, such as design standards and Bayshore Beautification MSTU improvements. • Strategy 5: Provide clear guidance in the LDC for new and emerging uses to ensure consistency with the respective Character Areas. 5-3-16 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 aYdddMA+ka..ddddddd d ddddddd d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d dwXddd**.S 60d0d0 ` AS..di)iIONFYF )N QkMA , F`NS G.F SS 3 F i�P`�5.. 1B !`F EEE iii YYY... Land Use Transition Types There are four main types of land use strategies to transition between differing land use types (Figure 5-3-2). Factors affecting use of any given type might include characteristics of the particular site or the general Character Area. BUILDING � � ; :"E't1 ''. ,**, rri: ritl • 'F ' I re \ , tn. --1, w rn in, Residential Corrtrn, rcial PARKING e LOT/LANDSCAPE et:Lre r -:::. Air, tt ? 111:01 ..'s '1"" ' p """" , ri (o i I , Nt / I i y^ I +r wr we. Residential Landscape Buffer/Parking Lot Mixed-1,ice ° GREEN/OPEN SPACE IOW f/M10.11111100111* E , Aikk .. lc : ' r rag ' ' n' ' g. * o6 , . 4 , .r '! /'esidentiial Nuturull eulures f ublit Square Mixed-tlsei INTENSITY OF USE 1 , ,,,,, ,,, . , , , at or 0 ,,_......... 1, 0 tio 0 ' r-r 1 3 rr-, F . ,T, qa *Er .,,imm, ' . ! I � ,u. Risidentin! Neighborhood ConrrrVrciaf Mixed-1.1ce/ Commercial ' Figure 5-3-2:Land Use Transition Types Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 11' " ��5-3-17 5.3 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS .. @ F < . s S 6 3 Or,m tlP© SP 6 *8 a•3 B Yx":3 . - +r u 4 fl_ ...N <> 9� ti NeededLand Use Transitions: Uses Elements to facilitate transitions can be helpful where there are dissimilar uses, built forms,or development styles. Strategies range from land use buffers(e.g.,gradual transition in density/intensity,open space buffers;see Figure 5-3-2), physical barriers(e.g,walls,fences, landscaping),or limitations placed on uses incompatible with the area's land use vision. Map 5-3-5 shows the generalized base zoning districts, highlighting areas with use boundaries that might benefit from transition strategies.The highlighted areas are described further below. Focus:transition from interior residential area of Triangle to the major commercial corridors surrounding it 40, Strategies: • Put in place land use transition areas of lighter commercial or multi-family residential near single- family residential areas • Promote use of physical barriers/buffers between heavier commercial uses and residential uses • Limit heavier industrial and commercial uses in the Triangle area Focus: transition from commercial to residential and between different residential densities Strategies: 431 • Establish land use transition areas to transition from commercial and denser multi-family along Bayshore Drive to moderately dense multi-family residential to single-family residential Focus: put in place transition strategies to mesh new development coming online with existing uses 41 Strategies: • Establish land use transition areas <4 5-3-18 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ft ...., ._. - laiiii N { ' ., -- ,DAVISiBLVD 1:11 A ,v 1 . , i511;11.W.X13 c'DVAIV/3 ili".0-.4 1 ': sin 1 0 mill ao.,p[2-AvE _z- rir._ . . ilium! „,,,,,....)%41/4404 ,1111!r — , • il 1..- -•,...4f. .1-,::-, '1 ., 4' e '----711.ii It IF 71,-i_i , . i.1,,. 14 1 -.; Jill -.1.,,, .vim._ ills .,,,::::;:,,i, :'' , :•,- -- ./•,, F',. '. '/.40: ...q.,. . ....4..... ...1 L Ati,, ,, -,2--- - -' - ...-.).• layskoi, „,..„, ‘,. .: •:.,i....ay.,...'' t.40.t..T.. ,,,I- it zLji o -rioltp.4_ - ' - 'C'vc - ' .:,,,,'7::,...":: iir41 I'Mini:.•;.4..W• ,_ .... ,-. ,R= • a,...i.r: * ,, i it,' --;...... 4''. Sugden Regional 4.s „ Ottatiiill;‘;, -.L.r.,,r'.',';',",h,•1,1i1!1‘..',:i. Park co - ct- wr :Mr. ,.,.Y ;, ''':72':', -,..7- : '.........*•:. . inimu -1 mi 1 I I t or 7, .11 siril" 3 1111 Commercial w ‘ < '::•,:,.:'A1/2!!,,,.i', , a jOh Z .1- -1.4;g1144Virlrftlirl-ir, ' City of Naples ., :irks'.•.:.;_::1 1 , p •Naples / EastNaples -' Mobile Home ‘.Z;7 Botanical _..—...1.1- Community M MPUD MEN 7"."— - "1- ', G'alit e n .. .</,(i ...Park . 1111 PUD I s • 4 :-.,-. - ',- - -- -nun ii II- 1 -— Residential Multi-Family '• ",i,, 1 im.........., BaYviei'N-•- 1 inn -iiiiiimaiir-'1 '' ::::.,-_ -l. Park iiiiiiIiimiiilli .•..,),. :: Res PUD MU Res Subdist Single-Family Residential •''",......::‘i, ... L i tilts ' .--.. Village Residential i.1,KeTi-,--- .:•.:'-. 1 Property Parcel AN DR EWS.AVE'::.7.._..sktfir..-LT....... - J IIII -I IIIII•niniiiiim .,,,,-:(,:„.,F..... -,,,,..*.. ,.. 0 CRA Boundary ss!':, ..::'-•.SIB 4'".:''J'' Wetlands . . , - ,.. ..... ,.‘„rair!Mill '.1.1.11.-tiill_ntill'17'-11':......',-1C.....,"1!---1,.:1,-..: '' '',,,. - - .ii:ET.::'•7,,17 [—_3 city of Naples ...:-v....v.' T....-- ---•;...1(.,... ."- ,` .,mr.. ' ,_ . ,,, ...w,66 '')4' ' —I, ..s.\(.4..:'Y `',.1'...?..;:ii:F.• . -2•?:'''''''..:v. 4 Mile ;).'..-ii;,ii:•-': -•'1'. 'i,jk -.:!...-,,,,, k,. ‘-... .).‘e..". ...:.., .. .. . ',AL:4 '''!'.• ' -_... ."... t q.!•.‘:'".•.•::..--,1,".!'.1 --'.:7:-:--)..*w. '..'•• :*--:-'-' •''.. ' --' ,:•:-....,.;',-:'• - at ...7... i, ----.:...\1//ll •..:,,i;;-.., „AI( • Map 5-3-5: Needed Land Use Transitions with Base Zoning Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Identifying boundaries between different existing zoned building heights can indicate areas where land use transition approaches may be helpful.Map 5-3-6 shows the applicable Mixed Use Overlay Districts that provide more detailed .. design standards for the CRA area with highlighted transition areas from Map 5-3-4 and maximum zoned heights of buildings in the table below. Note that there are exceptions for certain structures in the code(e.g.,church spires, ' antenna). PUD sites are governed by zoning in their respective ordinances. Maximum Zoned Height of Building in Feet ,, ` Mixed Use i ,� VA,A i a "tea ,C �"w a,� � � � �� ." lligglliBlegpliO Overlay _., eN. .�._ � � � � .� �� Mobile signation House Rowhouse Apartment Mixed Use Comtlrle, tal „,a Home BMUD-NC 42 42 42 56 56 42 gym, BMUD-W 42 42 42 56 56 42 ' BMUD-R1 35 35 35 35 r BMUD-R2 35 35 35 35 BMUD-R3 35 30 35 35 35 BMUD-R4 35 35 , GTMUD-MXD 42 42 42 56 56 42 GTMUD-R 35 35 35 35 ,is �1„ ■ ■ ■ ■ . Needed Transition Area ;i. 5-3-20 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 N i. �DAVIS BLVD KIRKWOO LINW^OD AVE ,._ `..� t .ii mi. / _i m Tq j :uu Is 1 t ! �� f I J w , a ulu BARRET:I-Li 0 .,11, • V • f,_ .', At ilk) ¢� Y A WjN��.�R• Sugden q - _�Q�v -- Regional p B(I • • ••- °� ': t Park s a . — ■ _ ., THOMASSON DR e: � ,• , . 1- ,._ ii' , 0� ECRABoundary+,// "-L z _ -. Park etgit >,r r /�a ,p w .'--K'AREN -='., '^.„' ZONING 7 I •- East Naples , Naples p -- ' PUD Botanical ( lrrti-- Community atu- RMF-6 Garden Park in BMUD-R1 '>M j r y.. r ,j Jz:: ul Bayvlew... _ f lu BMUD-R2 Park i_I {. 5'. BMUD-R3 du 1 sll IIBMUD-R4 - Ju .; 1s f BMUD-NC It ,� �" situ �" ANDREWS AVE vlu , BMUD-w ' II vr< yiJ• 'J[t 531u• vlu _ =ya GTMUD-MXD y a :' ..__ .. N J. ?lit• GTMUD-R k }� i Wetlands �ilr� ultr --- vlv .i ;,:->ur CJ CitY of Naples ,l,t =••• • 1. sl'•: vl ti .> .'' :: _._ ?..•.. ,ala '•.' :. ellli _ U B tt :»ltr -•.:: vl[ ' }le Jb ! :: .•ll.:UI[t '.: A te. l sal2r vltr , :- fit: -. .."T -ub`i aU[c I, :alt ;1.. Map 5-3-6: Mixed Use Overlay Districts in the CRA Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5 3 21 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A • Strategy 6: Evaluate opportunities for arts-oriented ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ADO code flexibility that will incorporate existing arts activity such as gallery space. Character Images for Design Style Objective 3: Achieve a consistent design A number of buildings in the CRA establish a modern character in the CRA area and sub-areas architectural style that the CRA can promote in public that cultivates the area's unique artistic and realm design; there are a number of residences with a cultural identity. more traditional Florida style that the CRA can also • Strategy 1:As part of a CRA-specific Arts and promote. Art that is incorporated into private Culture Plan (see Section 5.3.4, Objective 1, development, but visible in the public realm, can also Strategy 5), develop a comprehensive design contribute to the community character conveyed in approach for the public realm with reference to the physical environment (see the character photos on specific Character Areas.The approach might the facing page). In addition to architectural style, sign consider: styles can be considered as part of public realm design. • Architectural styles, including resilient Figure 5-3-3 provides potential sign design options for designs that better manage natural the Bayshore neighborhood of the CRA area, reflecting hazards such as flooding the style of existing infrastructure. The CRA can • Transitional elements between Character promote a more modern design for the Triangle area Area designs, building mass types, etc. in the commercial areas targeted for redevelopment. (see Section 5.3.8) • Design considerations for gateway/focus intersections • Design considerations for public art • Identification of public art opportunities and incentives • Design considerations for streetscape .;: improvements in coordination with the Bayshore Beautification MSTU Master Plan • Design considerations for CRA-funded grants for façade and other exterior improvements • Incorporation of urban-style development design standards (see Section 5.3.2, Objective 1) • Airport Zone height restrictions • Strategy 2: Fund a commercial facade grant program for exterior improvements to commercial buildings not targeted for major redevelopment. 5-3-22 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 a aaaaaaaaa0aaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaasaaaeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 2.rITON i. 3 FL. SDI . F'sillitiiitisiC.**' ' : . . , ,. , r., t7r.f i., . ;.,,,' - +ta a 1- r, `t'F '� ' rkl x: ., t' g"'3 Local residence with modern design style Modern design of Ankrolab Brewing Co.(Source:Hlevel Modern design of The Garden School(Source:Corban Architects,http://hlevel.info/project/onkrolab_bre) Architecture/Planning/Sustainabllity,http:// wing_co/) www.davidcorban.com/the-garden-school/) 14 Fl.-1 n . . , ., ,,,,,,I.:.:.:„„,:i kk ,,-,, ,, . ;..--,‘ - - ''', Rill . _ . , ',_ , ,..,,,,,,,,,-„...„..,:,. ,,,.4; ' ' . Opera Naples with modern design style Local residential design Local residential design � ts`sr d`" !' Diti, i llflN I tt, . i, .�. r ar: t � wif ' , _ tllx e�96' E,rP _ x.$, '' ,,..0..�` .e. t ' r. Local residential design Local residential design Art in the public realm on Bayshore Dr t' ,+OYWPiMa j 4.51.111114 • }U,N� aw�w m.ww I Ir ., v._ _ - __ S " 3 vm, O t lil Is$, a 3� l�.. / >aa.�aasuw¢.Gaaai .. wl Y .. .,...e 9WbiarilaiaYt l ^5. a_ 1lndale Okver 17- ' Tinaale Oliver Figure 5-3-3:Sign Design Examples .• Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-23 5.3 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS At ;i( Public realm design in the area is important given the emphasis on arts-oriented development and input from public outreach efforts indicating architectural style as a way of building a sense of place and community.The Bayshore Beautification MSTU has contributed significantly to the design of the southern portion of the CRA area with streetscape improvements including lighting,flags, landscaping,and the design of the Bayshore/Thomasson roundabout.The CRA should coordinate with the MSTU for further improvements, including the design of major gateway intersections that can include signs and public art(see Map 5-3-7 for opportunities). Note that gateway intersection opportunities north of US 41 would not qualify for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds,yet the northern Triangle area can explore the creation of its own MSTU to fund these and other types of improvements(see Section 5.3.7,Objective 3,Strategy 2). _mot 1 ;1.,;`,;. 3 „.' .,, ° 3 w ..6. f 'III 'I IIIL .,; "*'. $ s°"' ro,. e_.. E. �" l. Y 4S lea" :a ,e Existing gateway design near US 41 and Bayshore Drive 8 ,f1 a � r � �e ' „ a , , I ,,,,:‘, - ., ::::„,,, ..., .,,,, . ,,,, ., T' i r ce x y,�, ,„, ,, 1,...,,,,,..,,,,..4,:.,,,,,:, .,... ,..,-,..,„., „. ., `, -.'' -''.,-' 'g'''' - .0A. lik,,,,,..,-- „,..1.,.., 1.,,,‘‘„, :2 - . i Ar dab." ,.., -- '47,t!', .''''''.\,,,,,:v„,i-,..*::.,*:::.?4,1!,;:::,,,,I.:::,'E:'''',,,,,',.i,,;',,,,,,),0,14,617,40..:.44‘‘''A',,,,,,,,,,41,,,,,., fr '4 H ..• a Bayshore Drive flag,lighting,bike lane,landscaping,pavement .e 1 i treatments F _ i ■ ■ ■ ■ MSTU Improvements i- ., "„, , 4 Gateway Design Opportunities ` ...,._ .M :, Bayshore Drive/Thomasson Drive roundabout rendering 5-3-24 -.A. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 i PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEME T(iA 5.3 [--. N 'EL-771- I ' • 1 DAVIS I. x i A 0•••- •..NN., ,•• 1 1 , ) 'KIRKWOOD-AVE , 11 ... : : moon 0 Nigel.f.•C ---.Mi/e ,........,... , ., , ,.1,,i.• NE 1 0 milm.cc -7- ,N111 1:11- ° l_l I 1-c•- - '.• . / .1 ._..< cc I.r,.._-_, • 414i, --.L ni ,9e' kk:::- II [---I .,•-,Ili :1 ft- `",7'' 't ...r .re _ I I . ' • .1 ,. , 1 ,:, • ME mil ii '1321 L . I ,•• Fill 'IL -- /7-\ I \ , 1 - . S 'iniumilling MI la , 1i.4 , ,• 2 \I v. , s... , um...in .. ? -FFT1-3 * 'IVU ,,,„,,,,-- I ill )1 iia!,1!1111 ,. __,.._ • • L- /\ JIM 1P l' ' 11"11111111111 BA R -T,,2VB '44 1 '---7';,<•<, 11111MNEN - ''''' E 1 iiiiiiiiiiMillinin ',/'42-'-' d In nonninnmm= •4'' lidiiiiiiiiiiiiisi \,-•.... - _Trunurnirri Thr '•• • 0.1,„,,_•orvax,,,, 1111111tIllnillliiir,H, _VV I I .' w r' 11111111111111 .. .7:- , -.4 ipA 4. , a30m'e -.r 11111111111111111111 .°144..... , --.. cc Sugden , Park '', ..- 7-7,-,n; cp • i ----_-_, . onws Ellin=rii Regional iiiiniiimiltit11.111,1 ,,%0 iv, 44'. .1r4 I ' .'..:;--Aie,-:,• ';',`• 1 "''•,7:7:--' \-1-= --i rS-,-1 irrn .1,..‘ %-",c)' riimmi '77 N. . . THOMASSON DR .:..T- -,.%- , •, -.: ,ite..,, \ • es .-• ,''''''O. A1 1' i . ej4" lliiiiill Lili',:: l 11' -*-.--'''•4:-Y.1..'•- ' z 1,1 ,,,,,,-111111, i;iliiiiiilisi I ' ,..= KAREN " .'"1-'f:."•A-•-lt4•'.11.1-c...%,.....e,,s,'., i---i.',',I,'',,,'',.4,,,,e',,,,,,•,,--'• '; —'a'nl' D.R I " 4, 7 ' Napes E ast'Naples '': • Bo ial 111! ' Community -,.:..':-1,-4.-..)..'4.-- = Ti Park Garden 1- ;7.•.-•.,t7„.,-'''.V-.-d.!."4-...1..0_.'.: -- -f .. , ;,,•--."---.....14.•-„ae„..!t::;',.......a,-V....,..4.et '''''''' 11[3°D L--- ':•'-' • '' ''''''''' d ii iii•im T. .Ad..',.'41' :T.•:... 7..... -----..'--'''.'•- ..,....-','.. .- VV ..... isisumuisilii r .,. _...'.. . •••• -..,;.„..',..... .;'•',,",,,••,, -••...a.ii,,:...),:' . '.:-'",‘*,.T'--.)i.4''-'.• •:-:'.:::::::.„:'',Alt'f.':::::,i;:,;„,..---..::.... Park . Jr< . .. ..‘- . ....:'7.'. .'..i. 'M •- s we f,:,.. - ,, ,', ,x,k ,,--7,ill-1HW!Mini hinin ., ,. -.. --:LI:- ...-;'•,... „..\14:. ..... ,.:,,ii:-:;:\\4:-...-. .0miniiiiNiMill 1,:iw..,.:•,.,.*.„.?•''''me VSISV ,.'1°'"-.'" .4. - ,•,.• - v.NDSEWS-AVE...•.,._.;;;i4'...1'. ni Property Parcel ' - -- , - :--;.. • '•4';,.''''-'.1-..4.1!":1,1::. ..6,..........-....r;I:4'...:..*:::".-.:;:::414,,, :".... ...:”;I:. ,,.., ...... 17,-11.11.611.111114.11,11111.111;1111411 I....-_ . ..,,..... 1:3 CRA Boundary , ,..-,....1„•-•-,..:,,s,,i:,,, ".-I `16 .".-.-sl • 1 •7.-''••-4'-744, a Park 11/ .'''.4.!' '''''''%• ::-•• Ai' .11//,,i,,...... I'‘ palf1141.11111111 ir ' , •• .. -,•-. --42,4.1,,,-. 7•Wetlands , ---,,, • ..... , * .... _. . Is'1 ''.:.-.7:-,:i-h, .'• ,...:•,....,.1.,--...:74.-_,.....:„JiH----,...,*•• •-1-1-1.T.17"1.II-1111.1.:17::::::-.......:4 -:::: 4....i....-::..- 5!:— L'7.-.3 City of Naples 17-,.....-.•-•:-.• ;,:yi. '''' -- •.v.t. - Av: 1taragn1i1-l....1M. 2tle,34 *1 • - :1':::::.:I-.,:::''.2:';::: II,I.:, :,;..--::::•,:-- .--:: ... ...... ... ..... ..-7 -•:# r ....,-.,,-,4.•. 45 4 * i I( 1e sli „ 4".". .-....„ :-...,-,,,v, Map 5-3-7: Design Treatments&Attributes . 5-3-25 l''' , Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 ,i.,'„ A . 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS / 5 3.3 Public space, Parks, Objective 1: Increase access to parks and & public gathering places in the CRA area. ', Open Space • Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Road Public space, parks, and open space types of land use Maintenance Division and Parks & Recreation that serve an important community-building purpose Division to increase the number and quality of with particular design considerations given the variety bicycle and pedestrian connections 1) between of activity they can support. This section focuses on the Bayshore Dr area and neighboring County how to ensure accessible,activated,and well- parks, including Bayview Park, East Naples maintained public spaces, parks,and open space. Community Park, and Sugden Regional Park and 2) running north/south from neighboring County GOA� parks to increase accessibility to the Triangle area ",li,, 0 •.••i i R 4 4 k M 0 A (see Section 5.3.5, Objective 1, Strategy 6). • Strategy 2: Coordinate with Collier County Road Ensure accessible, activated, and well-maintained Maintenance Division and Parks& Recreation Division in conjunction with Thomasson Ave and public spaces,parks, and open space. Hamilton Ave MSTU improvements to evaluate opportunities for 1) maintaining car and boat s . parking at Bayview Park and 2) operational •......, •,..ws..•. w.w._........,•:.•+•R.e s s e..•-..w......w•...w.w.w maintenance at Bayview Park. • Strategy 3:Coordinate with Collier County Public —, !Uri.— 4—,1-1 � " , • Services Department to evaluate opportunities for i ' �w a park and/or public meeting space (e.g., library) in the CRA area. G4I • Strategy 4:Create a site-specific park plan for the ` existing retention pond in the Triangle area. • �, • Strategy 5: Evaluate opportunities for"pocket `� � - \ 9'� parks" (very small neighborhood park spaces). uhey & •\ �� : t • Strategy 6: Coordinate with Collier County Parks & .,,--.,, mn '; N,` �� v.S Recreation Division on any general parks . improvements related to CRA development/ . "`` — redevelopment sites and efforts, including the 17- -- - A Acre Site (see Section 5.3.4). Pedestrian connection between Bayshore neighborhood and Sugden Regional Park that can serve as an example for additional connections Objective 2: Support events in park spaces geared towards the CRA community. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Parks & �';� Recreation Division to promote park spaces as venues for CRA community events. 5-3-26 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Pat'4 ,iligi Connectivity Design a�� x \.oar.A h ae e ,• Concepts The potential park design concept �, i ' " ' y 1.° , , shown in Figure 5-3-4 for the Triangle _ ,, _ , ' A � tt �; y� Linwood Avenue , N , stormwater retention pond is based on e� � =� previous planning and design efforts for t m „ ,., ,A..„,:i. ,,,,,,...,,,,, „, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„„ „ u, the pond,with more consideration o e a � � r;. �� . given to increasing visibility to enhance -_., } i4 4 a 0 t ., gyp. safety in the pond area (a concern mentioned during public outreach). 4 ° = „; Francis Avenue The rendering includes a consideration for identifying sites for consolidated public parking,which maytake the form m."• \ ai ' i" , a �\. p g * . r of a garage. to ' � ,� r 1/4 *\ �\ rraIIhe d 8 s,. �' . wae•trua Brmge �";. vu, Oicnk Aree a 4 ic sae 444, 1,._ Man Avenue m a �+ Potential Parking 9 ora +a \** sti - F,rturc Park ': d t �2 + s "6 a ,..oh '', ,,„ 'in:i.,g.‘„::*'' ' ' ' ' 4 14 , 0#� is �` �c �� Fame x4 `� s,;, ,S'° �� r 7'' + m k 'h `n+ �, ,� vp �3c ,\4 US41 c ; �.�rtA[RST AERIAL PLAN .__. ..........�,_ Oau,way Manilla Path Tindale><Oliverr Coo.ity e,e ..,.........-.-.,.. design Figure 5-3-4:Potential Triangle Storm water Pond Design Concept Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-27 ',)i'I 5.3,' PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS A .„, .„ „ . 'sl ,,,,,, , „ , EXISTING CONDITIONS OOOOOOOOOOOO.....4******AA...A******.r , . Parks& Open Space The Redevelopment Area Plan update process identified parks and open spaces as important community assets, providing event spaces and opportunities to build a sense of place and community. Park access can be improved by providing better connections to parks and capitalizing on opportunities for new parks(such as at the Triangle retention tt` pond and small pocket parks). Expansion of the CRA area to include the parks to the east should also be evaluated since it may facilitate making connections and other improvements.See Map 5-3-8 for existing parks and opportunities.. . . s.. 2 •• .. -,:f Xaz ?'g x '1" ^. r $ W �'\ A� � 7i �R�'W'^ t �' �» yc+teb0e[l Sugden Regional Park:County park that provides inland water access East Naples Community Park:County park that houses 38 pickleball courts for 9 sports tourism and local recreational use;hosts the annual US Open Pickleball ,:•. and water recreation programming.Image source:Collier County Championship and other pickleball tournaments.Image source:Collier 1. Parks&Recreation Division County Parks&Recreation Division 11, : . 1 k so « I y I i .,Y' a .. 1 Bayview Park:County park that provides access to Haldeman Creek, Naples Botanical Garden:a non-profit 170-acre botanical garden with f 1 the local canals,and the Gulf of Mexico. over 220,000 visitors per year.Also includes meeting spaces. 1 - 5 .. 4. ., ...., ,,.:..., . „ -:,.:,:: ..- : y r Haldeman Creek and Canals:provide access to the Bayshore Drive commercial area and the Gulf of Mexico.The Haldeman Creek MSTU Park Opportunity at Stormwater Pond:potential for design,traffic N., � l`l' funds periodic dredging and maintenance. flow,safety,and flood management improvements. 5-3-28 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5•3 N .I I I H I I I I I I I HP ,4 Ihll .� _II DAVIS:BLV,D 84 KIRKWOOIII, 1111 I,I_n 1 r 14.. I 1 I o III8INIC , , 11 , LINWOODIAVEI�iCZ�'Y .u• . , - >— r �vur. 2!/ „Ai'_� 2 I[I l l I IU I '''e {, -— =i i—..,.. 7. , „,, , ,,, .,-- „,,,,, _ : Ito , 111 I _ T. HILL I1 1 � ' . mu- ii,\, „„,, I1. : 1 ju arf j 11IIJ111J i , IH- 94 'T (,I t .- ._ /.Ytt1 _ le _ . , .w.unr 11i�om 1rTrT[ Imin 7z ]IIIIIIIIlIu[IuIlIIlI(11 I ,„ k. 4.-.� BARRETTAVE •• " 1 . I ._•• • to INlligldIL Iffi�llLLII_ 1T El Clie 'L m, \ s 37 m' ' wlN � L Sugden SAR a :Regional T \\BLV'- _�c°,•_IW11UJI— Ll I ' Park 1, 2 altr `l\ s� t MEM '11�'T • 1 .......- HOMASSON DR' - Li, J j Ju �Q �1 1 11l _I llj sap, z .i.`mou1111 I µ Naples_ I_KARENIDR' 1: �p U.r ,r- i O East Naples I _. _..-' )"!\ .'. - Cornmunl .-- „Botanical �--��'J i , ;Garden �r , , Par vlu alc Bayvlew,i,. + o mI:r ' Ci M nit]l]' a..i _ " ,., Park 1 - I'' tr akr .I. ,tile -vkr I 3 11 .b, .. I -- ' I .� - ' 1' --;)lie:„--':':-• ,, I. 1.. ll tiV11111 I b,III 11' ;._. : i;. ANDREWS-AVE :' VIlt v.Urvllt . ali N�.II III 7y�llllll�ll � �_.J Property Parcel �alv - ' CRA o y 71t I r .a.,•• .,,.: y _L.- vkr vlv DParkB _ r _.. ..' I --- n..=:. • . v --- --- /:.::Wetlands _ ar _ . 1:: "...ylu �J City of Naples ..4 __ li I 4 . vlir a1k :: tJ,t� i r� -i- 11af! " ' I ti \Ux .al �� ?btr k.'z tie \y, ,, Map 5-3-8: Parks&Open Space Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 fi 5 3-29 O 0 9 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Objective 3: Ensure a clean and well maintained public realm. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with the Collier County Sheriff's Office, Collier County Code Enforcement Division, service providers in the CRA area, and residents and business owners in the CRA area to develop a proactive community safety and clean-up strategy(inclusive of private property along the canal network) with an aim at reducing reliance on case-by-case enforcement.This effort should focus on residential properties and coordinate with the Community Standards Liaison pilot program of the Collier County Community& Human Services Division. • Strategy 2: Identify and document a strategy for canal maintenance in the right-of way, including seawalls and mangroves, in coordination with the Haldeman Creek MSTU Advisory Board. Table 5-3-1 indicates the amount of parks and open space that are in and bordering the CRA area. Designation Location Acreage Estimate Total publicly-owned open space within CRA Retention pond site 6.48 area _ (northern Triangle area) (includes pond) Additional open space or Botanical Garden green space in the CRA 168 (non-profit owned) area Total open space/green 174.48 space in CRA area • Bayview Park 6.27 Park space adjacent to • East Naples Community Park 120 CRA.area • Sugden Regional Park 173.27 Total park,open, or green space within or 347.75 adjacent to CRA area Table 5-3-1:Amount of Parks and Open Space. Source:2017 Florida Department of Revenue and Google Earth calculation 5-3 30 \ Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 5.3.4 Development Development and redevelopment can improve the quality and aesthetics of the built environment, as well as generate tax revenue and benefits to property owners through increased property values.This development and redevelopment activity also needs to include protections for existing community members who may face burdens from the increase in property values, such as increased costs for renters. This section provides an approach to foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability and prosperity for community members.Also documented are more specific planning and visioning efforts for two key development opportunities, at the Mini Triangle and 17-Acre sites. 0 GOAL Foster and guide private development to enhance community character and provide increased stability and prosperity for community members. e4 - T cM b I I ft � I Mini Triangle site rendering excerpt;Source:Zyscovich Architects Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 � 5-3-31 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 AObjective 1: Improve the marketing, • Consider prior arts and culture planning efforts, such as those related to the Bayshore Cultural branding, and communication approach for District(Resolution No 2008-60). the CRA area. • Incorporate an inventory of existing artistic and • Strategy 1: Create a branding strategy for the CRA cultural features of the community to elevate. area to establish a community vision and • Include a comprehensive public realm design character.This strategy should coordinate with approach for the CRA area and sub-areas (see the Arts and Culture Plan and the Market Study Section 5.3.2, Objective 3, Strategy 1). for the CRA(see Section 5.3.4, Objective 1, • Consider housing needs and economic incentives Strategy5 and Section 5.3.4, Objective 3, Strategyrelated to arts and culture-oriented development 1 1). (see Section 5.3.4, Objectives 3 and 5). • Include administrative needs of implementing the • Strategy 2: Create a marketing and plan (e.g., an arts committee, additional staff). communication strategy for the CRA area to • Coordinate with countywide arts and culture communicate vision and character with effective strategic planning efforts. tools (e.g., website, social media, branding materials).This strategy should coordinate with the comprehensive design approach developed for the CRA area (see Section 5.3.2, Objective 3, Strategy 1), as well as improved communication efforts between the CRA and the community(see Section 5,3.7, Objective 1). • Strategy 3: Provide CRA administrative materials (e.g.,Advisory Board agendas, budgets, annual reports) in an accessible and easy-to-understand way. • Strategy 4: Coordinate with the Collier County s-' Tourist Development Council, Collier County Parks & Recreation Division, and other jurisdictions to promote the CRA area and its local business and commercial establishments as part of tourism development efforts in the area. This should include coordination with Collier County Parks& Recreation related to East Naples Community Park master planning and pickleball sports tourism. • Strategy 5: Create an Arts and Culture Plan for the CRA area to incorporate into the overall CRA area vision. This effort should: 5-3-32 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 111111 Objective 2: Streamline and clarify the )111* ' ► • � development process • Strategy 1: Coordinate with Collier County Zoning Division to clarify LDC requirements related to development in the CRA area, particularly related to: • • Relationship of overlay zoning to base zoning • Relationship of various applicable codes to 'f each other(e.g., LDC,fire code, building code) • Allowable uses US Open Pickleball Championships at East Naples Community Park. • Strategy 2: Coordinate with Collier County Zoning Source:Collier County Parks&Recreation Division,https:// www.facebook.com/CollierParks/photos/ Division to evaluate approaches to streamline and a.852 03 71 84 80 74 66.1 0 73 741 82 7.118036328207559/19606389606 shorten the development review process. 1394a/?rype=3&shearer • Approaches might include: • • Dedicating County staff to review projects 4 41 within the CRA area and expedite them through the development process. • Improving coordination and communication mi G. between entities overseeing applicable4 .1 Na les 570. � codes(e.g., Zoning, Fire Marshall). 7 • Identifying opportunities to increase Ilia lb reliance on defined criteria for development approval (as opposed to discretionary , approval) v��..<. t • Encouraging design-build approaches. Existing artistic features,such as murals,should be considered in the Arts and Culture Plan • Strategy 3: Establish a formal role for the CRA in the development review process to facilitate development of projects in the CRA area. 'ire .; Clearer LDC guidance would help new uses such as microbreweries Bayshore GatewayTriangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-33 Y g 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A Objective 3: Incentivize desired types of Objective 4: Capitalize on current and development. potential real estate and development • Strategy 1: Conduct a market study, including opportunities. information on owners of second homes, which is • Strategy 1: Facilitate tenancy, development, and not captured in typical data sets,to determine redevelopment, particularly for opportunities what development will be supported in the CRA along US 41, Linwood Ave and neighboring non- area. residential areas, and Bayshore Dr, through incentives and communication efforts (see • Strategy 2: Identify incentives and targeted Development Assistance and Incentives assistance (see Development Assistance and Examples). Incentives Examples)for a range of development and redevelopment, including consideration of • Strategy 2: Continue to facilitate existing catalyst the following types of development and additional project opportunities on the Mini Triangle and 17- desirable development supported by the market Acre sites(see Map 5 3 10)to strengthen and study: solidify development interest in the CRA area. Efforts might include assisting with coordination • Local neighborhood commercial of property owners in target areas, negotiating establishments desired amenities to be incorporated into • Social enterprises and business proposed development, and providing incentives opportunities for those with tenuous (see Development Assistance and Incentives livelihoods Examples). • Larger catalyst development projects • Arts-oriented development • Strategy 3: Evaluate alternative funding opportunities, such as private funding and • Strategy 3: Evaluate and amend as needed current donations, for capital projects. grant program offerings to reflect new incentives and assistance approaches from Section 5.3.4, • Strategy 4:Assess development opportunities for Objective 3, Strategy 2. the Activity Center area, including the Courthouse Shadows site. • Strategy 5: Evaluate concepts to expand the CRA boundaries. Considerations might include the incorporation of new development opportunities, such as areas along Thomasson Drive, and the incorporation of County parks. 5-3-34 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS Development Assistance and Incentives Examples among the Bayshore Drive businesses, the Mini • Density/intensity increases Triangle are property owners, and the property • Impact fee offsets or payment over time owners along Linwood Avenue and Kirkwood • TIF rebates and TIF money for infrastructure Avenue. • Land acquisition through CRA for targeted needs, such as parking and stormwater infrastructure, and to facilitate redevelopment • Tenant attraction and relocation support • Micro-enterprise incubator and technical assistance support in partnership with other local entities Potential Partnership Opportunities for Micro-Enterprise Incubator Incubators can provide workspace and assistance to micro-enterprises, particularly small businesses, looking to get their start in the CRA area. The CRA could potentially partner with existing efforts or collaborate on new efforts to support the work of incubators. For example, the Naples Accelerator (https://naplesaccelerator.com/) provides office space and amenities and connections to local economic resources to assist its member businesses. There may also be interest from other local entities, such as St. Matthew's House, in partnering to start a new incubator. Such partnerships can bring together organizations to pool capacity and funding to carry out incubator efforts and can also be used to support artists and arts-oriented development, a key aspect of the CRA's vision. Other Partnership Opportunities: Business Associations The CRA encourages businesses operating in the area to form associations and business districts to coordinate development efforts and potential funding tools such as MSTUs. Such associations can also serve as important partners to the CRA in its implementation of development assistance and incentives.Areas where these associations might be particularly beneficial are Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-35 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEME NTS 9 A to ADDITIONAL IN 't P 1ATlUN Development and Redevelopment Potential Figure 5-3-5 provides a general indication of the development opportunities in the CRA area, showing vacant land acreage and the corresponding number of vacant parcels by land use type that could potentially be developed and indicating that most of the vacant acreage is residential. Map 5-3-9 indicates where these parcels are located. As the map indicates, the parcel sizes can run fairly small, so assembly may be a consideration for developers.The background analysis for the Redevelopment Area Plan also indicates a sizable number of parcels with structures, particularly single-family and mobile homes, that might benefit from upgrades to improve their structural condition. These efforts should take into account any potential increases in prices and costs when units are upgraded to avoid pricing out residents who find the new price and cost points unaffordable. 109 acres (389 parcels) Total Vacant Acreage: 186 ly 41 acres (62 parcels) 36 acres (4 parcels) 0 acres 0 acres Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Governmental Figure 5-3-5:Vacant Land Acreage Distribution by Land Use Type. *Note:A 32.5-acre parcel northwest of the Bayshore/Thomasson intersection is coded as Vacant Institutional but is owned by Mattamy Naples LLC.(Source: 2017 Florida Department of Revenue) ti 5-3-36 \ Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS N i -1 fC- 111 -+-r DAVIS BLVD 84,1 A 1� 4. l ' KIRKWO� D AVE ,� 1j[4- ji LINWOOD AVEI) z [1 .. t �i, T rrlr g_' � '�� .'��'')•Faud—F .c ...I.--,0 *` q a nm 4, 2/l r I .�}- �. { b�L�h 1 =� • -_I a -- . , 1 �y -i • 1 b1L % ..� I -F-TTT� �� [ C . r �! Q "'rllrr Tim ' 1 i .,Y Ai :nil ; W .u.c.il uw --- /w �3nr- C'1 ! :•,Ulf! /V jL l �4' �\. BARRETT.AVE�Iui i P~ L� o6 , .i......'c, Ptre Sugden STgR Regional . ,8( -- r°-m TTIIT.L .' Park�. t-� VO - I 1T711111 1L:i��',.._.• \<.,.---..,, _ 1 ,,,,,,,i \�w THOMASSONDR± i skr a 4 i!i ! t [, N344'J 'z KARENiDR':. �C BotanicalaC . L 1 14 l" Naples' ;* , East Naples .: -... L i _.. ,,� = community n77 _ � ?� Ga den I '2� Park CRA Boundary '" m¢>rz_rs— a Property Parcels 1 Bayview t �C[1't Park • 1i tr on- scan Parcel 1 N V t .alu Vacant Parcels �1, _ , :r.:4),&- •y lieZIIIIIIIM" III d! ala ':- vacant Residential = - � � a s. v � i �� Vacant Commercial ANDREWS•AVE Ate. ,alto ' � ( ... �� _ ,._� �I. Ali,' 1 .Vacant Institutional ��lil 1 IL.IiltlluJ(ll1 `al ;.' i ° I1 L • via. Park F i '1Ltr u ,° �kt/s aLv ° Wetlands a.; • 1GIIII al Ullr t b - ta _ vk l[ of J. IelI11111N1 L. City Naples fir, « f vJu .. iltr y�, ' il!* .._t �1Jte 0.�v.;1�1t! ...:,,Ir .. 11.•. ,1. ` y4 i Me ,ts._,i 1 a �,?. ,I Map 5-3-9:Vacant Land Parcels in CRA Area.Note:Vacant institutional land northwest of Bayshore Dr/Thomasson Dr intersection is coded as Va- cant Institutional but it owned by Mattamy Naples LLC.(Source:2017 Florida Department of Revenue) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5 3 37 k" 9 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS :k5 '-,", t e,If 6', Fi `' "Mate Opportuutilies The CRA can facilitate development, redevelopment, and tenancy of vacant spaces through incentives and improvements to the surrounding areas. Map 5-3-10 and corresponding images show some of the key opportunities in the CRA area; note that the Mini Triangle site and the 17-Acre Site contain parcels currently owned by the CRA. 1 • 2 gi .. W Linwood Avenue commercial corridor redevelopment Courthouse Shadows redevelopment • - 3 ,: ,,,P 4 ,.� . ... _— L, fah - *---' ... • +�A' . Ac.:- ''',iall r,,.., Gulfgate Plaza office tenant opportunity Bayshore Drive commercial corridor redevelopment(including Halde- man Creek Entertainment District near Creek) k ~E . t WIVE•NOi FOOD• BAIT f' '1 [ 1 � ellR friiiIi IF5:4fiii lkla i',...L.L.:„:, ,..,.2,,,,:,is, '1,-.. it' 'iL"'"'-'1, ---- -----ri.'iiiii Del's 24 redevelopment opportunity "tea r 5-3-38 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 .,r..x N all.MI OPP,'Sill T, il iDA11 ' 6�VD 84 /y`.� ( IRKWOOD AVE L Mini 1 1 LINWOOD AVE Z Triangle i Jiii �� r �TI i� Ll[ �T1<�i•_t", ?E¢ --1 3 ma , r �l I n e p ,! - ,� 1 Y 1 `u • i '. i�' U [ co i v1t -„c) BAF s--1-AVE _� elf"'.'" 17-Acreriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiisinipo, iiii ` i- - Sugden Regional ;" Site k. 4.-, m 4�5 Park •b I b " \ f I THOMASSON taut M> . r'�i ` 0 K EN DR `• I 'Vacant Non-Residential P..� - East Naples /,l � ; ; Naples lN.Commercial ¢. Botanical ,Community .Industrial _; ;Garden Park Insnwtional �' ��. 1 � '+Lu' ' i� G-= " t Naples Botanical Garden Bayvlew_.. .tgm ■ .:.- i � � ,i, �County 1:.: Perk i I � a ,fir ��, �st t Ala vl� b Naples l �( _ Ake ,_ .a�sr 47,7 air .: . " ANDREWS AVE ala utility/other i iF tl ,1 5s ...:'adds`r.' L .;1, t is - D CRA Boundary LI. _ , ',U(r i _ f J Park : I i1 t ss �tJ{, ..Jfi. u... : Wetlands gar r 'sIG' .' SJis ,,,,ice „....,.1...:,..---,, > ..� C_J City of Naples ltlyttl.te. l'J ld . *JG ti3�r : .l[ u ' Uer s i, At'? 1e .t• 'llI A. N ,. �• 1.L, ,, ( 'aJ.(t t{ �il,� lx +.. tT_ _ I 0'3 l: i� - , `Ii . t �f -Ake 4 -'f l ..t. J,..• i J •.vw ,file `: .. R!L .`:: -•liUA pie _ "- >kr `MI _ r ' Map 5-3-10:Development&Real Estate Opportunities with Non-Residential Existing Land Use;Data source:2017 Florida Department of Revenue Bay shore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 ,. 5-3-39 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A Objective 5: Incorporate protections in de- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION re velopment efforts to enhance existing community character and support existing Collier County Mobile Home Upgrade Program CRA area residents. Collier County Community& Human Services Division • Strategy 1: Establish assistance programs and currently oversees a program that uses State Housing incentives to protect and enhance existing corn- Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) program funds to replace munity-oriented uses and local neighborhood mobile homes with more sturdy single-family modular commercial and single-family neighborhoods off homes in response to hurricane damage. In Everglades the main corridors. Assistance and incentive dis- City,these homes are elevated on stilts. The Bayshore tribution might account for building age, struc- Gateway Triangle CRA may be able to refine this pro- tural quality, and means of property owners. gram to meet the needs of the community to encour- • Strategy 2: In coordination with the Collier Coun age replacement with a more suitable building type for ty Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, pro- the area. mote strategies to maintain current affordable housing availability in the CRA while improving Residential Renovation&the FEMA 50% Rule baseline quality conditions. Strategies to consider The FEMA 50% Rule requires that any existing building include: within an identified FEMA Flood Zone will have to be upgraded to meet current flood standards if improve- • Community land trust ments are made that are in excess of 50%of the struc- • Coordinating with Collier County Corn- ture value. When determining structure value, only the munity& Human Services Division for value of the improvement itself(exclusive of land value) mobile home upgrades and replace- is considered. During the building permit review pro- ments with alternative unit types (see cess, the County will require anyone located within a flood zone to go through a review process to ensure Housing Assistance and Incentives Exam- that proposed improvements are not worth in excess of ples) 50%of the building value. The CRA may consider devel- • Residential renovation loan/grant pro- oping partnerships/grants to assist in replacing struc- gram tures to encourage bringing existing buildings up to code and maintain affordability. • Encouraging use of Collier County's im- pact fee deferral program for income- restricted units(see Housing Assistance Impact Fee Deferral for Income-Restricted Units and Incentives Examples) Several cities and counties in Florida, including Collier County, offer impact fee incentives for affordable and/ or workforce housing. In Collier County, for-purchase and rental units for households with incomes less than 120%of median income in the county qualify for impact fee deferrals. Deferrals are equivalent to up to 3%of the prior year's total impact fee collections, a cap insti- tuted to minimize revenue lost through the program. 5-3-40 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 The County also limits to 225 the number of rental units receiving deferrals. Impact fees are deferred for owner- occupied units until the owner sells, refinances, or moves out of the home, at which time fees are due with interest. Rental unit fees are deferred for a 10-year pe- riod. Historically, this level of deferral has allowed the program to defer impact fees on approximately 100 homes per year. A pilot program for payment of impact fees by installments collected through property tax bills (as an alternative to making the entire payment up- front) was also planned for the Immokalee CRA area. The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA could support or replicate the County's program to defer fees in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area;this approach could also be used to incentivize other types of desired development, as well. Case Information Source: Tindale Oliver(August 2017),Impact Fee Incen- tives for Affordable/Workforce Housing. hm� Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-41 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A 5.3.5 Transportation, Connectivity, & Walkability x Having a variety of transportation options that are c' easy and desirable to use are important for all who live and work in the CRA area. Transportation systems '' not only cater to local needs between the CRA area and places such as Downtown Naples and local work- . �R , places, but also to more regional traffic moving through the CRA area on major roadways. In light of the various needs, this section aims to ensure safety, comfort, and convenience for various modes within and connecting with the CRA area. .a0,0AP4,00.000111.. C�3 GOAL Ensure safety, comfort, and convenience for various modes within and connecting with the CPA area. i,.,.a...a....-..,.... •!4a.•!!•.*RR,4A#R,#RR4MT..R*# 4 I Y t ,1,,l j.G 9� S 4 I., £�.! R III 5-3-42 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 Objective 1: Increase safety, comfort, and elements on, for example, Complete Streets, the Vision Zero effort to eliminate bicycle and connectivity for active transportation modes pedestrian fatalities, and roundabouts. (e.g., walking and biking). • Strategy 5: Based on input from temporary • Strategy 1: Create a strategy to implement discrete installations from Strategy 4, move forward with transportation improvements and more vetting of Bayshore Dr road diet concept scenarios comprehensive Complete Streets corridor and traffic analysis. improvements. • Strategy 6: Evaluate opportunities for a north/ • Strategy 2:The effort undertaken for Strategy 1 south bicycle and pedestrian connector in the should include development of a sidewalk master eastern Bayshore area with connections to Sugden plan with inclusion of the following: Park and East Naples Community Park(see Section • Visibility assessment related to landscaping 5.3.3, Objective 1, Strategy 1). • Consideration of connections to neighboring parks (see Section 5.3.3, . °"""• (1) ADDITIONAL INFOPMATION Objective 1, Strategy 1 and Strategy 6 in this section) What are Complete Streets? • Coordination with roadway and Streets that serve the transportation needs of infrastructure improvements planned and/ transportation system users of all ages and abilities, or approved for implementation, including including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, those that may stem from this motorists, and freight handlers. A transportation Redevelopment Area Planning process or system based on Complete Streets principles can help other agency planning and implementation to promote safety, quality of life, and economic efforts(e.g., County and CRA stormwater development." -FDOT, Completing Florida's Streets, master planning). http://www.ficompletestreets.com/files/FDOT- • Strategy 3: Identify opportunities to coordinate CompleteStreets-Brochure.pdf transportation capital improvements with County/ MPO improvements along major arterials. • Strategy 4: Pilot transportation improvements, such as elements of Complete Streets corridor improvements, elements of Bayshore Dr road diet (traffic lane consolidation), reduced turning radii at intersections to slow traffic, and additional pedestrian crossings, with temporary installations. These efforts should incorporate community input and feedback to gauge response to more urban- style development and any particular concerns to address or opportunities on which to capitalize. These installations can be incorporated into community events that include educational Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 ,/' 5-3-43 9 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS EXISTING f""fTN4"E "HONS s.....w w........w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w e w w w w e e o v a s e*.o s e a.w e a Existing Transportation Conditions Map 5-3-11 highlights existing transportation conditions identified by fieldwork. Roadways in the CRA area range from large u , arterials carrying regional traffic to small neighborhood streets, many of which dead-end throughout the CRA area. During fieldwork,cyclists were noted on the sidewalks of larger arterials such as Davis Boulevard and Airport Pulling Road,and " , ; many bikes were parked at Gulfgate Plaza off of US 41.The MPO and FDOT also identified Airport Pulling Road and US 41 as high bike/pedestrian crash corridors. Relative to other streets, Bayshore Drive has a number of improvements, including bike lanes,sidewalks,and transit shelters,yet it still experiences a lack of parking.There are limited pedestrian connections to parks from streets off Bayshore Drive;one connection is at Republic Drive. Note that these existing conditions are a general, preliminary assessment,with more detailed measures of existing conditions such as trip counts and traffic modeling anticipated as part of follow-up strategy—and project-specific evaluation prior to a decision to implement. .r , , � eye. . '� a r e r, ; -.. e a , "1 , Divided arterial with street fronting parking Cyclist on sidewalk of arterial 4 „slit , r a, '', t- p4 f Bayshore Drive with sidewalks and bike lanes Bus shelter at Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive .., 5 6 v a �..� 1;4 -<... - Dead-end neighborhood street Pedestrian bridge to East Naples Community Park Bayshore GatewayTriangle CRA Area Plan—May2019 5-3-44 Y g 9 A „:„.., PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 m 'Z_ N DAVIS+BLV',D 8 A ' i ' I 'KIRKWOOD AVE L+ INWOOD-AVE I — 1- O j --I�" \w y4y. .... o . lu _ 1 1 90 1 T , 41 i u J4:10 • . ..,..., .Ir ,auk: 1G, :':a '; l".: �Y. BARRET-T-AVE 4 (,� -.. s.1.t .. ' p LL .i:. / - •— -"tiiN1)STA8 N � - Regional �,l„ " 1... o B�Vp ,1 Park CI,.., a r 1- • w THOMASSON•DR ter __: • > z -.� CDKAREN•DR— ' 1 ��. - /`~�� _ Naples-_ East Naples i s� • _-. - --- Community - Roadway Classification �C ( Botanical' 6 ,fir ;Garden Park . ?i. Highway J , Bayvlew " l v Major Arterial Park Minor Arterial . < al t ulu.. k Local alz ,J/i .... ...sakr Y —L I 'ilxr. __vlu _._ .MI/ :�tlu .J, Other • 1 u N . 1 ANDREWS AVE vlu �� ir:: \1 ': ^du .:i-Uv'.`._ ..:"\V., ' I:, < .sJsr C o�ndary aJC -4Ur ai_c._: �Ult , 4il.r Parkal v�W . ' -'-- ... , _ * *- • • ---- ,Ai- ._.�'�.�1'. ' ....�.'1 If.! :_:-11�!! '_:_•:C:•.r.::'1�! S�.CI. •: 1�.� FF • +*I' of Naples :',... atu .,.. ._, _.Jr�.: - ::'suc ..- •Ji _.:. om .::- � alc 7A. 'av. ._ au' :flu. 7 ' G :: lit! -, u! I. .. . r kI ' ai IJ ' vu ! vu t ‘....‘lie .'4, t.. -- 5t ssU Map 5-3-11: Existing Transportation Conditions with Roadway Classifications Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 d, 5-3-45 9A 5.3 :- PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS rgisilt4GCVNDl BOH a 4O**t. .... ********** *** akd .0&00006,80 ` 06,1*M*s'sxk 0 H:0 Spnific Transportation Needs&Considerations Fieldwork,discussions with CRA staff, public outreach,and specific project recommendations from the 2018 Blue Zones Project/Dan Burden East Naples Discovery Report informed location-specific,discrete transportation needs and considerations in the CRA area (Map 5-3-12). Many of these needs and considerations will be addressed through Complete Streets projects recommended in this Redevelopment Area Plan. Other transportation improvements such as addressing sidewalk and bike infrastructure gaps,providing parking infrastructure,and providing wayfinding signs will be addressed through separate project recommendations. Note that"Major Corridors"are designated based on highways, minor arterials,and major arterials in the area. "Needs Corridors" are designated where needs identified are generalized along the length of a roadway segment(related needs are those where labels intersect the corridor on Map 5-3-12). : Bicycle&Pedestrian Traffic Ali'i,:., �,,� `.; Curb extensions el Traffic circulation along corridor, including intersections 411 General bike accessibility 431 Traffic calming 411 Pedestrian crossing(s) co Connect street 4 Bike lanes iiaiiiiiiimottiiiiiiait Parking .t, ` ;. General connectivity, walkability iiii� North/south connectivity 41:10 Commercial parking East/west connectivity 411 Parking including boat parking 8 Sidewalk(s) 9 Wayfinding 10 ', Lighting 11 Road diet(lane reduction) Major Corridor ■ ■ a ■ Needs Corridor 5-3-46 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 1, i pm N 1 2 DAVIS BLVD — 01. r` A LIN 5 ii° 1'1 .1, likii— \III I�► I iii4�r � r¢IIII 1. O 3 2 1p inw �7Sir1 P . _ N I l In UII / i o 11E=° ,, / IIi., wt i ii— _ I) .^\:cr SV 'I)",': .,' aim"-....r1 r// I. " 'j1� �. .: 1 , ``�1 w 1 ai _ •3 W 9 tit ,11 Ho J_�_ vLu k` /v, al I I S,I:11[1 , Jar Q4' • 1 it : Lc vlv. _ NI i 4 AVE4 .III1l 1..:11 s �P -� mnl�iiiiiiii. ,iiii.uiuu1 .: -I �IIIIIIIII.I nlulll nmuw m mane " _. - ` &De o;ma IIIIIIIII11111�P ',M. II Im-r 1 y�Jr. DUII� :nm aw a n mmmll M P*: - 1i IIIIIIIIIII{AI� I s ` i Q..DVUyDST� H i Sugden qR. a, Regional e C " ll Illlllilill s .1 - <�� -- m IDIIILll7, Park ,altr IiIIII N'' \w DMASSDN DR " - ',�)u �� It l t l l I I I ` - i ,� a' o ' :. Y� AREN DR lr / = L „nF ,stNaples — Naples r i mumty c Botanical i 7 vLr t oa� I = Garden x q a Park w o ♦ tigi� ,l .A1 , �At Bayvlew'.- -i nm" '.I hf i t alu ,i)c ]ll hb • ul .. .T .i 1 I... ,d,�: 3` i Park p ..1. } r }l L _ " .n1 CS't I Ili{in "x— ..yam _ I,S p."" .ak J... - .l(', vlu +'�'�' i.al fi Iv e -,: ,,.1 {I{Inllin��lin _. ,r NDREWS d.�r. pParcel��, � �� ' � � 'limit + QPropertyPa I �'� '� IIIINIifll!In;. CRn Boundary • L4 ._:" v4t. .._ Valli•;;-;.i.e p i vlc w' ' r sa i �kr yalG !Park B 4, ,., J!r yU I '�l AV J£ .� Wetlands • i. al« �In nnIIP". 111 , C_ It to I - al..- _:_ a1it • ' '-... .-L i *' li I City of Naples `xi• ill, It J . al -slu :_:.: b.: 0,3. >ai f - � ... .... Mile Map 5-3-12: Transportation Needs&Considerations Bayshore GatewayTriangle CRA Area Plan—May20195-3-47y g 9 A . 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ADDITIONALIN" Til=, .......d.M...m®m.....®®..eat.P.***.........m...A......$. Regional & County Transportation Projects The projects shown in Map 5-3-13 are those identified in the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's Fiscal Year 2017/18 to 2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program (which also features the Collier County five-year program) and the trail recommendations from the Comprehensive Pathways Plan update process.These projects will thus be overseen by regional and county transportation agencies.The full set of recommendations from the Comprehensive Pathways Plan, once finalized,should also be considered in conjunction with transportation planning and improvements led by the CRA. FDOT TIP Projects • US 41 resurfacing • US 41 signal timing improvements • Davis Boulevard resurfacing County TIP Projects • Davis Boulevard/Airport Pulling Road intersection improvement 0 MPO Pathways Plan Proposed Trail Improvements • Naples Bay Greenway(Sun Trail) ♦ .♦ Major Corridor 5-3-48 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 i i.--.- , 1_ 1LL __I . _ --____ , - L-I r171 - . 111 7-r A .., DAVIS BLVD 4 7 KI RK vv,p 0,1,5`AVE I IL 11,-.11-111 11(jc7, l'an11111,111i, 4 ,nr[-11 1 t----T1-7--r-- ' elilni127= * , __, LINWOLDC2LAKE 4 )N . , L Iffirtz "1 I 11111 cc 111E111 NI cm , . 7 > .4,,,,,_ ,,, ,ii 1 .. . rrl-- - ] .. 4 o .m11 R '.".as ''..---.-. - -_,L. < Inv:a .,i ,,,_ --. ,, ,,,,, R , ,„,- •.. ..-- 1 • ilk —11116 II° NE-- 1 O J 41 21.E :!r.:471114 4 . 8 --1 \11 1, i ' _ 1 . - I i I 4 •, _ 1,nil 2 .4, .....,, ., .. --.-.'1 464- '.--- '" N. . , I 1-1, - , - ' ,i,.....-.. ..,---x-- `411Etli A 'M \ _. .., - - ''-. JAI' i 1,:c .:: .\ .-'' ''-,-, , illi 41 0 ;1+-H"'11"IT' IOU I --IL, ..:,-,....;:y7 / (1..) ,-L .U.111 1,,L__ i :arillinrriu- 4q.t;41: -....,z,4\ -- 1 lir 1 IBA' ET-T;AVE-lliff-T-1J `.„ f . •-, ,.,..T.„. 1 -Li ,...., \ ,i,::,.,...•..., i,.. illELL,I. ..,, I .,._ , .,,.....0 .,1 iiiii,61:: i=„, - 1•1111' IllinILT 2Pqla''cD,,,,, \czei-,cacuf,G, - ;,.•.," ) H -1,-'' 1 'r-'-----------in, , --'----,-cc—• ,,,, or.- L Sugden .iii. Regional 1 , } Will \kV e-----. .11=1111GIEFIED i rEl ',* t._.------ E.:Trarrmirum-u , Park 4st i.•7.i.-i tl''' ',',5:4 w . . -...,:•*.-;- ,,? •• • 1 1 , -.. ,.J././ .a.,... _......,... ,, , ., , 2 t, -.-.7.7...-Ct\l& '111• ...•= r P-' \-.4.THOMASSON DR^ *• . , LL; ...•.. --... , •..,..,), . _ 5 1-1 'Lid1_111 I . fk 7 ' 14.F4 7111-AA:'117.1:1: 0 tit'• • •1 \REfliDF11r `11.East.Naples 4 Naples 111 M i---:_,--- i-:ii,Gommunity -- -/71.-Ici Botanical cd, 7 • ill , Park ,:::7...-,1!:/..7 7L:-:*•-,,,k-'::":7 • , ,3,,,,a11.,___)I ,' Garden al>-i' ; - 7;;:.---- 4,...:•-•.--•-•u.....-..- 1 imi CDELEECO:= ' . Bayview i i -7-71 , a gill - ,I: •': - ,:7 41: :Ty ::., ...:.:.74,,,, ,.....z,..,,>...... ,.., 4, ."---, 1111%1 dill-i 1 - '' --= Park ..i i i . 4 i-,-.-41 ..4.< i . •w ... + ..,)...4.e.:!..4..-,,,,ii., .-iii-.•7'. I .„._. ..-..,t,, iiii-. -i , •, I co . . 0, .-- ,',....7..;:._:-.,-...:01.e, •,.7...t.......:-.---:'*. iii:ii1.'11".....---.. .1//i . mi..ct rirrrrin—rr 1.4 . ;:.: "'_' .. •'"".: N.N14r. :.''.... "'-:::'Alit '...J.',-:- ' ! -......,._.'-'4.....-,...---4e. shlwt 1 hpo <<:: '4.r. j„ r _,,,D. ,_REWS-AVE „•,j.re,.---.........---4-4,.... • si, .. - - . m 1."titritittitr,."-..1,•• 1 Property Parcel , .-.. ---_, •_ •.. 515 ',ale,:•i '..iiiiv ••••• - iii-•' ii .•-•,-... "-- :..-- 'ri ii- 7. -r- III gE 1 MI litN 1.1g;....., ..,......: CRA Boundary , i i-*-.---...:- ,- -, N.*/• ' 14 '.ii'' ----• tk-ii i"-i, . .i ,i.::: ii,.... ...i.i:411. ::.....::•••••:..„--, 1111: " :,..... ••••,• - '1., ...... • Wetlands .r...*. :-1 -i '-'.?14'. '-- '44::; '.."'". ---. ' ---' 'al/ ."' '' i-..". i ',Ms, r • - .:•„.,k• -.-- L_J City of Naples ... ,•- •- -'--_ '•••••-•1t t •I *,-.. ....•* ::: .4.- -• • :::::-.). :"7-, ',..W.e ...it:.-...,.)r.i.:7.--•&W. .:.:.- itk a.'.s?4.0, i•4-4- . .....,., . 1, A. :.::. '.;...14 ....:::;1 ...::-.... ; ‘?4.e.r...:..... , . illEMEIMINE Mile :....'...... . .-.. . -*f•1::.i*.e:.'1'......4q.::: .i* ''2-'.-...N514:c :: **•:;1.7.:Ak, Re.'-4'.:::.).i.,:::-.. . .. .-w:'.. ..,.-',...q, --',,,,tei. .'1, ' - :4 .'..g.....‘,. , •-:* ',."..'.:.:::-..."-:."-4 o.t.'•'- '....'::: -:- ......'-,....-- ‘ii. .4.&,• ......,. . 4,: ,4.,".,.,..'1':',.,.. ..„ ',.--,...!;-"..;„‘ti;:"-......,•'7,:•:••,::"..„ ;. -,--:.;,..,111:„..-.: 1. '. .,.,„ 0 ," ', *. 4ii :. Map 5-3-13: Regional&County Transportation Projects Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 :411'11 1 5-3-49 .„,.. ..,. , ,„r, 5.3 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS s,. .mow ._>P: 9rbb i.�ri xr�';= • '� °�m�a s�a a�e e�m®♦w®� a a��a m m,n�a a:., �- u Potential CRA Complete Streets Projects& Trails Complete Streets is an approach to comprehensive corridor improvements tailored to the size and land use context of the corridor.This approach can address many of the major needs and considerations identified in Map 5-3-13, including traffic calming,sidewalks, bike lanes, lighting,wayfinding,on-street parking,and landscaping. Complete streets improvements can also be coordinated with other infrastructure improvements,such as water main,fire suppression,and drainage upgrades. The CRA can take the lead on Complete Streets projects,focusing on the streets listed below categorized. Fieldwork,staff discussions, public outreach,and prior planning efforts informed which streets were targeted for these improvements. Map 5-3-14 shows recommended projects for neighborhood streets and busier corridors ("Major Complete Streets"). Suggested improvements for Major Complete Streets corridors may include changes to the roadway for vehicles(such as the addition of on-street parking). Neighborhood Complete Streets&Trails recommendations focus primarily on improvements for pedestrians,cyclists,and other active transportation (see the remainder of Section 5.3.5 for examples of suggested improvements).Connectivity in terms of destinations and network connections was a key consideration in selection and prioritization of these projects. Note that the length of the bicycle and pedestrian trail will depend on considerations such as available right-of-way;the Section 5.4 capital planning provides an estimate for a section between East Naples Community Park and Sugden Regional park.Also note that the Kirkwood Avenue"connection" between Pine Street and Shadowlawn and the Pine Street"connection" between Davis and Linwood refer to proposed roadway extensions that that do not have existing right-of-way. Major Complete Streets Neighborhood Complete Streets&Trails • Linwood Avenue—Phase I • Bay Street • Shadowlawn Drive • Linwood—Phase II • Bayshore Drive (north of Thomasson Drive) • Danford Street • Thomasson Drive • Hamilton Avenue • Commercial Drive • Jeepers Drive • Kirkwood Ave/Kirkwood Ave Connection to • Republic Drive Shadowlawn Drive • Bayshore Drive (south of Thomasson Drive) • Pine Street Connection • Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail illimm4jo. Major Corridor 5-3-50 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 .,,,....:.;*:.-...4..i ,.„, 1 r 1 i r ir-rTIT...0- N I 11. ''1.'' '', DAVIS BLVD 11 A rl /,,,,, Ks41,/RK/W1\01 Op:AVE , ' 1 ,,,, 1 filimmil • > LINWOOD AVE -- --:- 1—' - ' .R.c5i 1 2 -,- . .... , : = E,z, ,.."- EifiLi .. L.. _ -_..- . I = '' ' ...1 R I LLJ ,,,,,, , J.1 Din:f—[5 ,, 1- irm I— 1 I '',' 'FL 1 i "fe ' il L7.7c 1 7-9 cc . -IL • .- - " .` — r_ ,..:.... . =6.11 4--- . 1 II- 1V:1---- . 1 4 a N,A /-,\ ' FF11111"1 ii= " 7 i . ic.• --- F--710--;Irr i , , :-.: ,,.,.... _..... ..4. _,.. , tirr_rl __ 1 /10,, L ,,,- ‘ -4ji;;-.::'•...". I"'•.•--"•I•,•,er::.--'<-.-•".'!^"*"....-',s',.y'k•. ' =_ 2 1.,i,',,l•I li „ ' 11I'':..,.•.1./ i _=- :- •- •::: y .,, 11\ _ \P• ' - • i ,,Illi .•,,,, •i'.41(7''::::l'a'- •7/ '.4\ \- III"I BA' TT-rAyE -...:...: :,-....;•-•::. " j MT-Friittt H 444':.:,-•. 4 T.''''' `N.__,i ce I . = ism ecu lift II 1 111111f11 lati -1 I at m "In In.'" \`',,,,, .-_. ,-', oatzfjc‘2,0 P., ‘,4., '•- . ........---.... axby, • - / 11),e.'4"41.0411° ,, , , = 1 ' •cr 'ci3 ti .1 Sugden ••••!• c R •-, \ ‘ c.,) Regional ct \8(1",,---'=""'"'"-• . I r'"1":'• I' II lel JEEPERS Park ; -_ . 0' -'-c - 0 • - - - • , •kli".---. lj'' 40., ...-•,•• 13-,,,.,.1,- • '`,..-\\ I iL , "7 :.--••i Y-"'' ITT , 4,,•,,. Nv.... 7 Qa II k kI THOMASSON DR '' ...;....:::4,,,;.-:::• , L ,. ,.,..,.. :..., hirimat :--.....-..-.-:'...'.-.,-i.:--..9''k.'"E"."l7-:"-.,''. o.- ,, -s .....:• , - ' - -- i z0 • 711 n,- ,:- -: KARFNm•iDn R * 17. NOles REPUBLIC DR..d. :••'East•Naples •4:,!.,"•sl L — Botanical — ommunity -;•.-:-- 2:" ' ...,Park :,....,, • ,.?"•'••:•••'..." VA.'••••"1 ' DANFORD ,;•;;;;•_•-•• ., a e. Garden ' ' '"),:. ', t• . 4e 'sic: • -:"...-"::::•,‘,.),1 •".E.:",At", . ',s,lk..... , ,-- I 2 - ...,-(_ ,i., ,.. ...V.At4,, ‘.1:!..•14#: !'..:,::!^,,y,r Bayviein:V.4,-..1 ii-1;41:11...' 0 ''','.;, . ful-:1 . ..---. „ ,...-::•..r..71,...„::17.,...,..-.:-., 4,..,.. Park J4 ;"lir-in 1 ." L, 1'.'' '"4-44 .., i .- '-;,I,I l''''''Z'••".‘ ,''4•'-',4J5.;'4'''"41.<(•;4,----At& :-..". -e,•'.4..',..-W t• .-----' BAY ST . . ' t::,,,:. '.i,- .. :' ..4 .," s' T' I .• 'Y'..--:',.-:'"::-.44<. 7•••• -:--:"''':.;* :''',"..-...:.'..- _.4i,::".. -- ._ *..".:. •,,J.4, Ii2:,.'!..!:...". 7 ',,,:.' onliiiiiiiii=lia .:.: •"*, -• • • -., li 4,a14,.......'7";:. ' '''x'''''''' 'N DREW S A .,::':..';tfi::7.: r-7,.,...,:.:::,.k.:--:.:.1., .....-•::•.:..„.„-.2...-"i-- " - 1(,,; ,-c.:. ,. . . , j Properly Parcel ;;,..,1c,-,1,r,. ,.• .1., .- ,.•- ',..-- - •.:-,..•,:-.4 .--z- ., .,• 1,41011111011111111111111- ''..:: '4,... , '-"'' '''-s.., -....•..';„,.... -. . .. ,mifigiiimpimimi '"..., ', ,......::: 1:3 CRA Boundary — ---s'•..4:.:::?•• ...:::".: .4/.,!.::::::-'5, r. -..*:....:-:- I .... ._ * ,.4.te -. ..... -`7.;,..a.tte it"'•' ,.---Wetlands . El -4k.•..:-"Vli.,C'''''.'''•:.: 'l-sEr;,•:.';"•-._..• '.:::FAI.(,,,--;:-.-••.`'..• •.:=.;;;. ;:;.:::r'!.•• .:::7 .% ... 14:11&Qt.4.5 ' -1., 4 .::.•;,.,' :2:71'i-;?: k:-.:.:.-, ..- '::•••>4 ...::-.q., ..,-. '..*----ci, ... ..... ...e.,.: 4., - .;-:')'`.: '....".4'*.4::: '...- 7 i',*7'..;........ A ,'.1 ,••••-'As- '515 ' d. '..„,..,-..,4& :-.?''''" •'AI .*1:::' ..,,.. 4- '''-' " ..-::,.,ii,, + ' ' ',,k, '•••• •••••••zi 7- ••• :: _'''''.: . ... . .,,,t,.; -••-••,J•i',. ..-•'• .,,,,,,.;.. ..,.* Map 5-3-14: Potential Complete Streets Projects Or' • , Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 - 5-3-51 9 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ADDITIONALINEi I ;N ........,.a**0*,***04.f144.1;0m*.....� .e•. Character Images for Complete Streets Improvements and Connections The following images illustrate Complete Streets elements from prior planning efforts for Bayshore Dr and Complete Streets improvements elsewhere. SAYSHroNE pRrvE ah,rt!t: I • r3 ti^�.rtit �y,�t w!?.:� " per. 1 24' r 7 20 �,'"° 20' 55' 3 a II .r ''' II. 4' 5'i 7 PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION T'%C LANE ROAD WITH PARALLEL PARKING,& ,.ANES,ANDSDEWALKS DESSGN SPEED=30 JAPh Potential cross section for Bayshore Dr road diet,as proposed in Trebilcock's 2017 Parking Needs Analysis.Existing cross section is four-lane road with bike lanes and sidewalks Complete Streets improvement • ,. • examples(Left image source.' .1-, — a '" Wikimedia Commons) 4.11• • These efforts and examples inspired the renderings of possible transformations for Linwood Ave, Bayshore Dr,and Jeepers Dr(shown in Figures 5-3-6 through 5-3-9)suggested as part of this Redevelopment Area Plan update effort. As corridors for potential commercial redevelopment,the Linwood Ave and Bayshore Dr renderings highlight an emphasis on ample sidewalk space along the landscaping and storefronts. Linwood Ave might promote a more modern design style for lighting and streetscape features as shown in Figure 5-3-6 and potentially further inspired by the modern style images on page 5-3- 22. Bayshore Dr might retain the existing style of streetscape elements in the lighting and signs.These renderings can provide a starting point for Complete Streets designs of other busier corridors(see "Major Complete Streets"on Map 5-3- 49),with the Linwood Ave design particularly suited as a basis for the suggested re-designs of Commercial Dr and Kirkwood Ave. As a less traveled residential street type,Jeepers Dr shows how people biking,walking,and playing can share the street space with cars accessing residences.Given that many streets dead-end and do not allow for through traffic, more simplified pedestrian infrastructure may be promoted over formal sidewalks. For example,the pedestrian space in the • t. 5-3-52 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A - PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 rendering might be indicated with road paint.The swales have also been retained for water quality considerations, but incorporate vegetation to improve the visual appearance of swales. Porous pavement may also be an option for the areas where swales are represented,which might require different maintenance costs(an aspect that would be addressed with a more detailed follow-up design evaluation as noted below). Lighting in provided on one side given the limited road space, . similar to improvements made on Lunar St in the CRA area.This type of design might serve as a starting point for the re- t design of other neighborhood Complete Streets projects(see Map 5-3-49). 4. Note that these proposed cross sections are only intended for general, initial illustrative purposes;final designs would need to account for a more detailed study and analysis of factors including engineering considerations, impacts, mitigation needs,and potentially the increase of alternative transportation methods(see Objective 2,Strategy 1 of this section for examples). For example,a follow-up analysis of a lane reduction proposal on Bayshore Drive would need to account for impacts to Level of Service standards on the roadway and on connecting roadways such as US 41,air quality,freight and evacuation routes,and a variety of other factors. It would also study whether additional easements would be needed or desired for a re-design. Piloting temporary versions of these improvements also provides a way to vet the design.This plan accounts for this follow-up analysis need and piloting with budgeted items for a Bayshore Drive technical feasibility study,a Complete Streets Implementation Plan that would provide a next-level feasibility analysis for these projects,and a Bayshore Drive pilot project with opportunities for additional pilots as part of the "other" non-capital projects budget item (see P' Section 5.4 for more information). ' .,. . . .gym. , ... . N. t."j . as''- M we Sk L^ " s, /� w 7t SIDEWALK CG PARKING/BUFFER TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE PARKING/BUFFER CG SIDEWALK B' 9 -II ...._.............._. _.......___.17' p' - 8 r 2' '' ea colter Two LANE SECTION WITH S�D£WALKS AND PARALLEL PARKING:SCALE 1/R'-ICounty LI oon°°d� lndale:Oliver .M,...,,.,.wwm.,. ,wil.M...,....,»....a..•.....m.«.. .r an R...,n.�..bw��... d e s i g n Figure 5-3-6:Potential Cross Section of Linwood Ave ems" Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-53 9� ‘: 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A . p . . rail fit ,f4... ‘411lik. f t's ° I AN')SCAPI: SIDEWALK PARKIN(, PIKE TRAVEL ANE LANDSCAPED MEDIAN TRAVF.I.I,ANF. BIKE PARKING 1 SIDEWA.K IANUSCAPI- I ANF LANE N1.. 5 0'--•-.1 d' 5' II' - i LANDSCAPE -.1 5 CO 15 CO J -»LANDSCAPE ,m y CE1�'. TWO Tay o I.ANE e Spy* WITH MEDIAN,BIKE LANE.PARALLEL PARKING AND SIDEWALKS AND SCALE 118"•I' County 1L 7e2-91d Tisdale>. Oliver .. ..- ... ......:....,,.,...,., -......,..„....,„.,-,..-......IA o-.•.,,«. .........�....(M....m.�.o...M.(M...K,. d K S i 5 n Figure 5-3-7:Potential Cross Section for Bayshore Dr i 1 i a 1 t x S M 'd � ..... .r a,® t ,W ' ,Kt Al BIOSWALE 'RAVEL_ANE BILK PED • BIOSWALE LANE p'_.. ......._. 14' —B' 20' __..........,, r 6Y ONE LANE SECTION WITH BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN LANE AND BIOSWALES SCALE IN' 1' Co Jeep.n DN., TindaleO ivl County u'v,zald >4 design ,y.mw..,.........,.,..»,,,.,.»..,...„,......,....u..o.�...,w w...a. ........mnew.•A...,.•..•, r d a x i 8 Figure 5-3-8:Potential Cross Section for leepers Dr 5-3-54 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 .,,,,., 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 *, x 4 R !,„s 4 LSiSN"T �, e �� : � . R i t \ Np a. t�. 1 1 S e d'� j1F fyy. i• ,. $. + i f ,.al x .3' } sc .. t _ 1 , �.,' . BIOSWALE TRAVEL LANE BIKE/P£D BIOSWALE LANE 20' 14' e' 2D' � 60 WITH BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN � OWAESSCALE 1B- Ie 4O fiverTndade s i g LANE LANEONE D BI Jeepers Dnve ACA: 911742018 1xa+ � vtne i�'f v y, ev w.^.. ...Orai,.....n..,,..flb,..,'SL",-.., Figure 5-3-9:Potential Aerial Rendering for leepers Dr I Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5 3 55 0 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A I Objective 2: Increase and enhance alternative vehicle mode options within and connecting with the CRA area. • Strategy 1: Evaluate opportunities for alternative A ib' transportation methods(e.g., golf carts, electric shuttles, other neighborhood/electric vehicles, shared and/or autonomous vehicles, bikeshare, water-borne transportation), including considerations for partnerships with neighboring communities. • Strategy 2: Coordinate with Collier County Public Transit& Neighborhood Enhancement Department for transit service and facilities improvements (e.g., more frequent service and transit stop shelters). • Strategy 3: Evaluate option to expand Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) to include entire CRA area. Objective 3: Improve parking options in commercial areas. • Strategy 1: Evaluate parking concepts for the Bayshore Dr and Mini Triangle/Linwood Ave commercial areas, which may include: • Shared parking with,shuttle service, particularly to meet peak-season demand • Reduced design requirements for parking • On-street parking as part of the Bayshore Dr road diet • • Parking garages • Parking mitigation fee (development pays for construction of public parking in lieu of providing parking spaces) • Considerations for changes in alternative transportation methods such as those noted in Objective 2, Strategy 1 of this section. 5-3-56 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A , PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS i . 5.3 rigIaii1 IINFOPMATION a.aa.a.aaaam.ma....®.a..»»......a.a..a...m...°.....m4.. Transportation Concurrency Exception Area(TCEA) Policy 5.4 of the Transportation Element in the Growth Management Plan created the South US 41 TCEA. This designation allows commercial and residential developments an exception to meeting transportation concurrency standards, which relate to the timing and programming of necessary transportation facilities to ensure they are generally provided in a timeframe comparable to the development. (see Policy 5.3 of the Capital Improvement Element for more details). The strategies developers can use to obtain the exception are intended to reduce trips or miles traveled in single-occupancy vehicles, such as incentives and amenities to promote transit, carpooling, telecommuting, walking, and biking. This Redevelopment Area Plan reinforces these strategies by promoting mixed-used and urban land use types that support alternative transportation (see Section 5.3.2). Objectives 1 and 2 of this section also promote improved facilities for walking, bilking, and transit use. A potential option to further align the redevelopment efforts of the CRA and the goals of the TCEA is to expand the TCEA to include all of the CRA area, expanding the exception applicability to further encourage alternative transportation. Vest `((' Si ``,, I -' i� ... DAVIS BLVD _.. �iitt j — - Public Commercial Residential Total Acres . _� - 92.96 540.58 429.49 1063.03 —r = ; I -o=I— 8.74% 50.85% 40.41% 100% i. o A 413r - . - z ' b ,. I - --- ^_ THOMASSON OR . - `.... - - RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD -. V 0 0.150.3 0.5 031 . - _-. �< am — �mm Mlles ----- c.,IxAO W N BETH vANO,AICP ..-_.-. 4 V,.saM Prcrlt CITCEA 6«. TR -4 cm" ^^ '~4. South US 41 Transportation P3 Parcels Count=1596(,6p%);Sun of acxx=106303(100%) r wa V=a.kk.A=e„M�e aaraa VOcant Count 4 229014%).Sun of*cm•116.a1(10.9%) Ns.ua•.a" Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) No VauN Count•1356(856%I.Sum of acres=946.62(69.1%) South US 41 TCEA (Source:Collier County Growth Management Plan,Transportation Element,Map TR-4) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-57 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 9 A Objective 4: Improve transportation connections with Downtown Naples. • Strategy 1: Coordinate with the City of Naples to explore and partner on transportation improvements and approaches serving both Downtown Naples and the CRA area noted in Objective 2, Strategy 1 of this section. ADDITIONALINFORMATION •»•»»»»» »»»»»»»»»»»R»»»»»4»»»» » M& 4 Wa. N &R b F— Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study This study,completed in 2017, included a recommendation for an improved bicycle and pedestrian pathway on the Gordon River Bridge(5th Avenue/US 41)that connects Downtown Naples and the Triangle area.The proposed design calls for narrower travel lanes and removal of the road shoulder to increase the bicycle and pedestrian pathway to 14 feet on either side of the bridge. If implemented,the responsibility for carrying out the project would be FDOT. ` 1a a :. Ana ° l Proposed typical section for Gordon River Bridge bicycle and pedestrian improvement from 2017 Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study (Source:City of Naples,https://www.naplesgov.com/sites/default/h7es/fiileattachments/streets amp stormwater/project/3351 city council presentation 201710 final revisions.odf) 5-3-58 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ` 5.3 5.3.6 Infrastructure Objective 1: Ensure that infrastructure Infrastructure can be key to facilitating development, provided will effectively achieve its primary providing the services communities need to function. purpose without significantly compromising Certain infrastructure, such as for stormwater environmental and neighborhood design management, is particularly important in the CRA area, which grapples with natural environmental quality. factors including storms and flooding but also • Strategy 1: Develop a stormwater master plan for benefits from a healthy natural environment due to comprehensive infrastructure improvements that quality of life factors and tourism.As a result, the incorporates consideration for the following: framework for this section aims to provide effective • Flood plain designations, including FEMA infrastructure that preserves environmental and flood designations and Coastal High neighborhood design quality through coordinated Hazard requirements improvement planning and funding. • Building and site plan design to respond to flooding • Primary, secondary, and tertiary 0 GOAL infrastructure improvements(both short- and long-term) Provide effective infrastructure that preserves • Potential for a bicycle and pedestrian environmental and neighborhood design quality a pathway in easement of north/south through coordinated improvement planning and drainage ditch along Sugden Regional Park funding. • Shared maintenance and maintenance funding between County and CRA • Water quality •.M 4 4 4-•-••4 4:•-4.•4 4 4..•-•4 4 a a a 4 4 4 4.•..♦4 444-...-....4•4 4 4. • Use/design of right-of-way areas on local streets, including an evaluation of turf block (see page 5-3-58) • Innovative techniques to pilot in CRA area, including green infrastructure • Strategy 2: Coordinate stormwater infrastructure planning with design of new parks(see Section 5.3.3, Objective 1). • Strategy 3: Integrate green infrastructure improvements into landscaping and drainage improvements, including those funded by the Bayshore Beautification MSTU. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-59 9A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION .........1,** ^xA R sa R*@ t 8 Y!*****4 A.♦e#Q k♦i 9 M tl@ s P a a e$ 0 0 0 0 0•• Green Infrastructure Exam les P • e *, �, Green infrastructure aims to reduce stormwater runoff andAlli*r ;« i treat it closer to its source while providing environmental, social,and economic benefits.The following examples create A *is> ' surfaces or collection structures that allow stormwater to •i ,..., e w . infiltrate the underlying or surrounding ground.They also can 'se help manage stormwater flows and improve water quality of ^y, ; runoff and often can be combined with vegetation and landscaping. " • Infiltration basin/retention pond—shallow basins or ponds that collect stormwater and can allow it to Kissimmee Lakefront Park rain gardens(Source:City of Kissimmee, infiltrate the underlying ground https://www.kissimmee.org/Home/Components/News/ News/2208/263?backlist=%2F) • Permeable pavement—pavement that allows water to flow through and infiltrate the underlying ground • Rain garden—shallow planted basins that allow water to r« r . , , infiltrate the ground • Bioswales—vegetated or soft-lined channels that collect and convey,slow,and clean water and let it infiltrate into the ground • Vegetated planter boxes and bulb-outs—infiltration areas with raised edges that can be incorporated into roadway design features • Tree plantings - ...- isoi Vegetated infiltration area in roadway bulb-out in Palmetto,FL at 10`h Ave W and 5th St W(Source:Googte Maps,https:// www.gooqle.com/maps/@27.5151522,- 82.575633,3a,60v,118.29h,75.57t/data=!3m6l1e113m4! lslahaGivzSzL DetQ43h5HQa l2e0!7i 13312!8i6656) ■3 • ;• " rTA, �3► �• E ' '�" r '��ttlr•- '. `dr '�.^ i .rr�lt �,wx �e a t r ;v'' L,i rs 4'44 ! \aw'..; ',t, .''\ \c r. ad, " \' "> � ,� '? .‘iy!► " ,a •* '� �w iw v `m^ .wc , . �\ \ em + ,• T4 # " 1 � \° ,\ , ' ° m mom` '.' Retention pond amenities in Tampa at E Dr Martin Luther King Jr.Blvd and N 19th St(Source:Google Maps,https://www.gooale.com/maps/@27.9815571, 1 , „ -82.4391844,3a,60v,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m411s(113u13LDTatc2Vr7pkfflq!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) 5-3-60 • Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENT 5.3 Objective 2: Coordinate with other jurisdictions and government entities for IA infrastructure planning and funding. Strategy1: Identifyadditional funding �. � ' �� :"1•• ' •• " 1,..'.... w•1 . , opportunities to supplement capital ° c improvements funds e. grants). � .'.I�IIhI Il��1�{1111 �, �4 �� (]�� .�� • Strategy 2: Document the project prioritization strategy to upgrade water lines and fire :� - suppression systems in coordination with the City � , - of Naples. Turf block,shown in the right-of-way area immediately bordering the • Strategy 3: As part of the stormwater master plan street in the photo above,has been used in certain developments in the (Objective 1, Strategy 1 of this section), Bayshore neighborhood to allow for use of right-of-way space for park- ing.This option should be evaluated as part of the right-of-way design coordinate with Collier County Stormwater considerations in the stormwater master plan update. Management to integrate CRA stormwater infrastructure planning with County stormwater planning efforts. • Strategy 4:As part of the stormwater master plan effort (Objective 1, Strategy 1 of this section), coordinate with Collier County Zoning Division to create right-of-way design guidelines for development that coordinate with Complete Streets concepts for neighborhood streets. • Strategy 5: Coordinate with Collier County agencies and utility providers to identify and improve other infrastructure including sanitary sewer lines, roadways that fail to meet minimum standards, and electrical utilities identified to be placed underground or relocated. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-61 9 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS pp gay$ e�{yiy 1}3�y� ' $..,t�u�y j $T Es liY i,3i@ i.i ,a dt1f 3`e.g'd P 5i 6i d 6a RPd tl RIo I*4Uow m Q d l,,od Sto F*O Woms0<04t , 4 cloadway Engineering, Sanitary Sewer, Electric Stormwater and flooding are major challenges in the CRA area, requiring special attention be paid to stormwater management projects.The CRA has already overseen a successful drainage improvement project on Karen Drive,and moving forward,will coordinate with the County Stormwater Management Section. Map 5-3-15 shows where further stormwater management improvements are needed based on public outreach.Additional needs should be identified through an updated stormwater master plan for the area.Other identified infrastructure needs on the map include upgrading certain roads to meet County standards, upgrading capacity of sanitary sewer infrastructure in certain areas, and placing underground or relocating overhead electric utilities in certain areas. 411 Need for culverts for flooding, Retention pond area improvements needed—lighting, security, barriers/gates to direct car traffic, pump improvements for flooding issues coFlooding issues and need for drainage Flooding issues and need for drainage on side streets off of Bayshore Drive. Note that Pine Tree Drive, Andrews Avenue, and Woodside Avenue have been identified as below County standards 4 (involving for example sufficient right-of-way, drainage, paving, or similar elements) in Resolution 2011-097.These streets should be a focus in stormwater and infrastructure planning to bring them up to standards. Flooding issues and need for drainage on Holly Avenue. Holly Avenue also identified as below County standards and in need of road engineering improvements (see Item 4 above). l 6 Palmetto Court identified as below County standards and in need of road engineering improvements(see item 4 above). Upgrades needed to sanitary sewer capacity in the Triangle area to support new development. Opportunities to place overhead electric utilities on Linwood Avenue and Commercial Drive underground or relocate them. TN 5-3-62 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 - PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 5.3 . ..., , .._. ... ..... ,,. N A / K'IR-.4KW.-..-2--;-Oj1DD.-.Aj-rVi".--Ep iTAlV"_I,„S IB.!•1L.,4V.LC14]D T..I.... 140fl1.14-11.11184i.j1. .....-.... """. I 41r.rrIrr I - II' 7-71 .' L.--1 4111Ir LINWO" E 1:IA Z .11[11 TEELb.',. • 11 , . '7o....„ 2 ,. _,,,, _T., .,..,, *4,,, .: N 1 c ,. . fl i -,. ..,,,,,,,t, I.mai,.....,4...... , 4 7f 9•• // t • .. . I cr i I • 4.i. . p..1--,ni —114_":4-z . i , s - 1 • ''9<,' 4.-4,44....,..:-.:=--' , 1 '' ' ' I - ..• - I- ,901N- ' .4 , 4 "NI • -- 199 IN. — ., . 7..` , .......1 1. I--;:zi l'::.117.-- ..-. • -- '''',.., ... ",\ );..k' .. . - -frA•t!,,.,.:2'...-,--' ,,, - -1 1 1 f 111-1-177..] -,,\ - ' ..---<\\\ 4__ . r. •."-..,....144 .t:',i;- ,r, ..-. _ __ ,--- ^ \- ' ' .."**..... ''7.. 'cc '•:: '''1111-II, UL' ,.,, .,.. .....;,,, (.1....T.,:w4..---..,7 ,.,,J.)ii ,-... , .rrii-i-ri-rr ! =- '- • ,. ...„ ..... . .' '' 4--::-.\\I&H'''..... 9c.' -- Li.11111_11 i i ' • muumuu mule . , 1,..::.::' '!i'..::-.-:.----....:• .c,? 1 , BARR'ET't .'*.x.'''''•.4 „3.-- \._,, , , ....,,,,... .,-.,,, , 1 Ji:e.. :.--,'t:• , iirilu1 lamemiliiniiilivr1 (ro,67- s- . , •..• -..... . - ag,,,x4c.,^4 f:21‘ , . , ,,,,4,1o., 41':---7 ' •,.._,,,,?rallicoazi e_,..."_.,,,--,.....__..---fry/----,..., I I • '."7- Sugden if) ,r.4: _ C) Stil RA 1 , - Regional , ..', . : -----------cr) 1. , . Park immm...,4 fr p In-AIIIMIIIIIIELIIIIIIII I- . \,,,,,, \ .. .. .,a_tcr.:7:•:::,-4/ ..i..T., ; •I'I -I',4C,"'--''/ " : I - : I i ,,..... .Q... ....r:.:::.....,., 1 :.............. I r,, . ', OMASSON,DR. . , ...',.: 11E111.,., 6 .r._...,........t. .,,,.... ...,,,...kr.;..,,t, ... ..,,........ j(0. o :1f.',-'2''41/Y. ,:,--,,t'..=4„,.---... ,,, :„ , .East P ,4,,•44:.:7'.,,, k,';' .•:,•• - X ', Naples;,...'-,,,,,, L.,,, , ......_,.. Corn',Nnaunlietys'4!:...:'61..,......-..; .....'. :: --',,,, H 4cc ''''sBotanIcal 1 ,., J).-1(11, ,, park ,H,...,.,‘. ....... ..i&Ti,..:....,,,..,1k., LE,51P 0' ."'''...:;::,Z'Gal ifen- ,,-'' - I. tri,----n-- ,- .:::::1:-ni;----,„;, :..",.....:i:sz,.!;":-,- ,i,,,f,"• [2:_______•"-1.%,, ' . '41',..".,:. ‘i:',‘- .,m...4,_ —,— ,, rt-.4 11'[..„:: ,,,i,,:. .:„.... .',Y,' :::•.::!.. z:..,:... -,....,,-' ' = 0,.,, IIIIJID L-.-,-.-,-. ,,:‘,4.;, , ,4*,,.„ ,„,„..,, ,.intu.....7 1 .„., .,._4:,..•*..::.I.::,,:i., Bayview !..1 74iili pig 1,_ ,„,,,,.,,,,,,a-,. . ‘0•0:''.- Park .. ......._ " ''" ft.. . „ ,. ,,,,,utio. 4 ..,:...,..,.:,.:;..,-.-....,-..:.* ::.....:...':':' •• '-'' ,y,14- .__. '''••=-'suei I• --.•------Al-k.---. .---.- • AN DR W ..„.....- --- [ ]Property arc° l IIII : I'. 'Ilf. -"I. ---' ••-• Lill!'piiiipitpairille.1.. '4''''...;...,';'1;:I7.:.:I.::., I:3 CRA Boundary •*7'''''''I ''''', .Y:' 4. . .. . -iTh.- 'hide- :...).:: 7.....:*It? .; .,.....;Wetlands 'ski ..,) -,.:. 7,4 ,..4. ':.--.--::::sxl.q .L :,..-.. - I I k--- ... --...,4, , ... ..;i::.;'..*::::::..:":'!•,,Ni-t-e...---::?..144 ---'•--- ',L.; E- City of Naples -.-. N,',, 'sIte ... '''.4 :72-" • .,.[,..::;:s." 11(,,,,s'7..- ..... 4( .- ''''''...... 1--. - .:,:>)14(.0$...-: • .... ',T,' . -.4.2!'. , `,..411 ',at;'T.-',:‘,Y,,•-.::;.. ' . IMMIIIIIIIIII/ PISMIIMI'lr, Le:•:le---sliet.:•.....:::: 4t((. .: ,,'. '.85.--''‘..."'ll 'tide''7: '. '''':...--. 1: !I4 7 ..!' ''•-•:...-.. '11.''' '''''.7'::'::'''''';.. /A.4:.'1.'.:;;;'''-- '•.. '''''..:' - '' I ih1411!i04014.A:::. '• \I" ....:::,[.. •,V,,...-..;:'-.7 sijW.....-.:-.4g...:::,44/..--.'•-•• -Map 5-3-15: Infrastructure Needs-Stormwater,Roadway Engineering,Sanitary Sewer,Electric .::., Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-63,!','": ..'' •.,:'' 11,:', 9 A 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS The City of Naples provides water and water infrastructure for the CRA area,which also supports fire suppression systems such as fire hydrants.The fire suppression infrastructure can influence the insurance ratings for an area. On a scale of 1 to 10(with 1 being the best),the CRA area currently has an Insurance Service Office (ISO) rating of 4. according to the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District. In practice,the District typically assigns ratings of 4,9,or 10. The City is currently in the process of upgrading neighborhood water lines to support hydrants for fire suppression. Areas highlighted in red on Map 5-3-16 indicate water mains that do not meet the standard fire flow requirements determined by the City of Naples' potable water model.These mains have potential for replacement to upgrade for fire flow improvements. However, note that other sections of the water mains in the CRA area are older and will need to be replaced eventually. There is continued interest on the part of the CRA to identify and obtain grants to complete this work in partnership with the City of Naples. 5-3-64 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 A „.„ PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS9 6.3 L..., jillAill 1111111114— DAVISi VD Bay z, `'i-tr KI' .,"'" ''' ="•VE4 I • I' • `LINW,OODAVEni �z1 }t= fit+ �, 'Vru.,+a,tt�li �l I � �� T •Areas highlighted in red indicate water mains that 17-1 ��Tq ; ,z :1-1 ` do not meet the standard ' fire flow requirements + t ' is 9Q ' determined by the City of I ',1- 't` Naples' potable water • { `� �� _; a a s I .. . t 4,"•. model.These mains have I • potential for replacement I , .1 v _� •• ,� I to upgrade for fire flow F } improvements. However, i l note that other sections of -• c;''' .,,i-, ,,,, j �. the water mains in the CRA , r' �,--- area are older and will vs-.� • s>. RIFF 1 r,A.r h >,>i need to be replaced even �O a ,i° tually. -� �,R t 2 l,.- v. �_ w_ M ,3 �a.. //V�� v Sugden cr STyR`` l a% Regional_ �O ( 7 B »N,y•,r>r G^�i Park D V ' L ,cr I tuna' ''-' '4'.: :.' c'''*-A- 1.1--71 ' , , iti;,,,,,,,,.1,,,,, .Y ...,.✓� TIHOMASSON DR ' �� ; /,3t C • KARENIDR+j -_ t;'" ... F p • ,t�.'.., East Naples '4" t cj� / -I Z Na les -- 1 .'yfp �¢ Botanical Community - 1V.;a , �l S . Garden Park sJ,, . . xu. Bayvlew Park 1 a i{4, , `I ., 1 _..i Property Parcel k'1 1 ❑CRA Boundary �- > - h.mi ni=ir f • Water Hydrant attr 4 lv [ Sit a '.�a ullU ( ' vt le. a ANDREWSAVE —water Service Line +ler ,,; y>� '✓[r ! i i" m g lilt 119 ' ' —....Pressurized Water Main .",,:',.• - .tinitlh IQ ., '''''';';':‘11,,,rL: ! , vlct• , , a i _....Park _ y-. : - ...-. t --- t- reM.5 Li•"- . ! - Wetlands �'yatr. *2l(t r . nn!!4 I. �� I-J City of Naples . �klr ,_ .' �,1 t;. ' E : 1 a Mile ile=J a �i+ de a x r ` ti�l r .: . .1 la. .- �JG.'., _..L. At&. �. Map 5-3-16: Water Infrastructure f . Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 ' 5 3-65 �� 5.3 9 A ..,, PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS ,,,,, '„ .6 Process Objective 1: Improve approaches and tools The substance of the CRA's planning and for communicating with communities in the implementation is important, as is the way it carries CRA area and the general public. at out this planning and implementation. In view of the • Strategy 1:As part of the marketing and s diversity of communities living and working in the CRA communication strategy(see Section 5.3.4, area, this section lays out a framework to carry out Objective 1, Strategy 2), evaluate communication CRA area planning and implementation efforts to mechanisms and tools that will most effectively engage and serve the various communities within the communicate with the various communities in CRA area. the CRA area. • Strategy 2: Coordinate with schools and other ••••••......... Q GOAL ........••••• community partners to improve outreach and communication between the CRA and harder-to- reach populations. ' Carry out CRA area planning and implementation • Strategy 3: Provide multi-lingual communications efforts to engage and serve the various and materials. communities within the CRA area. 1 • Strategy 4: Create a CRA-specific Capital Improvement Plan to identify, prioritize, and i •..•••......•.».•,.4.4.40-..-41.0-4,4,11..1.-•-•..4..41-..•.11,..-•.41.,•••...41,e effectively communication near-term capital 1 improvements . Coordinate with MSTUs operating in the CRA area for relevant capital improvement projects. Objective 2: Ensure a targeted and balanced distribution of CRA planning and a implementation efforts. • Strategy 1: Account for both need-based and geographic considerations in the distribution of planning and implementation efforts. I • Strategy 2: Identify street blocks for targeted comprehensive improvements, with a focus on blocks that have already received some improvements and consideration for balanced distribution of these targeted blocks throughout "1. the entire CRA area. 5-3-66 a Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 � A � PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS k 5.3 • Strategy 3: Update rules and procedures for the CRA f Advisory Board for legal consistency and with consideration given to a balanced distribution of planning/implementation efforts and diverse representation. Objective 3: Coordinate with MSTUs in the area and explore opportunities for new MSTUs. • Strategy 1: Incorporate Haldeman Creek and Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory Boards into planning and implementation processes for CRA improvements. • Strategy 2: Explore the option of creating an MSTU for capital improvements in the Triangle area north ofUS41. Character Areas In addition to a diversity of communities in the CRA area, there is also a diversity of built character. This section tailors the thematic goals, objectives, and strategies of the previous sections to specific character areas within the CRA area as a whole. The character areas numbered on the Map 5-3-17 are defined by the land use characteristics discussed in the preceding maps. Key focus nodes, intersections, and corridors within the character areas that have potential for redevelopment are noted on the map with the asterisks and dotted lines. For each Character Area, a brief description is provided as well as a focus for redevelopment efforts to prioritize framework elements for each area. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-3-67 5.3 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS9 A 0 411 ID Mini Triangle/Davis Shadowlawn • The Mini Triangle, including CRA-owned • Primarily a residential neighborhood with mix parcel, is a major commercial redevelopment of apartments/duplexes and single-family opportunity and Focus Development Node homes around Shadowlawn Elementary • Corridor commercial along Davis • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus • Linwood Avenue another potential area for Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between redevelopment. north and south sections of CRA area 0 4 Airport Pulling Tamiami • Mix of corridor commercial, larger big-box • Corridor commercial and residences, style retail, and County Center including two major malls, Gulfgate Plaza and • Part of area currently designated as an Courthouse Shadows) Activity Center in Future Land Use Map • Borders US 41/Bayshore Drive Focus Intersection (asterisk), a gateway between north and south sections of CRA area 6 Windstar North Bayshore • Residential is primarily condos and single- • Focus Corridor along Bayshore Drive with family homes in gated communities neighborhood commercial (including • Includes golf course designated as a Haldeman Creek Entertainment District near commercial use Creek) • Mix of multi-and single-family residential • Focus Intersection at Bayshore/Thomasson with planned roundabout • South Bayshore • CRA-owned Focus Development Node (17- Acre Site) • Primarily single-family residential 'neighborhood with Naples Botanical Garden • Wetland considerations for development , • , • Focus Corridor Focus Development Node/Intersection n-. rv� 5-3-68 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 ,, 9 A 5. PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS 3 ..mow ? 1 �'�� ',':::9,DAVIS BLVD A �. RKWOOD� er�� 1 LINW00D AVE ' . a cc f T� O �� O vla ' �iq 0 RAF i i41) ...., Ilk 41 10, 4 _ -: .. .- V -, �� . 0� f3ARI • AVE lri- - 1 st•P� a lip O i"I S y vcc ' Sugden , TAR a Regional �i, /kit!) m ( Park .��. ;'. ,'':::::,::11, bI �.w ,A > THOMASS( }w i<ARLN DR' 7ol x air - EastNaples �_. a1 Naples Community Botanical vl . - 11 r Garden Park Bayview' llrc r p Park ) yvI ,Ilu .. UIEr ... vl t l �.� , _ alu la , ANDREWS AVE v,l,>t �CRA Boundary i'r ';'ail[{! '1 --' ' et 1- ii r ,1C 'I,;; [.jAI,city of Naples ,' `*der i )l. ato U+ QQ _ uui vlu - ala i u �G. ,u�r �e az 40 t d ='.. vk -.. Map 5-3-17: Character Areas Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5 3 69 5.3 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS • Infill development on vacant residential lots • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets The following provides a focus of redevelopment for • Complete Street improvements along Shadow- each Character Area based on the specific characteris- lawn Drive tics described for Map 5-3-17 and the most relevant strategies. 3. Airport Pulling �. • Transitions between residential neighborhoods Mini Triangle/Davis and commercial development • Urban-style mixed use commercial redevelop- ment, including capitalization on the Mini Triangle • Eventual street enhancements, particularly con- as a catalyst development site and urban-style nectivity across Airport Pulling Rd parking solutions • Commercial facade improvements • Park development at retention pond site 4. Tamiami • Complete Streets design and commercial redevel- • Connectivity to Downtown Naples via US 41 opment along Linwood Ave and other nearby • commercial roadways; pedestrian scale street de Redevelopment of Courthouse Shadows sign between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, and the • Tenant opportunity at Gulfgate Plaza proposed retention pond park 5. Windstar • Improved access to Mini Triangle development • Complete Streets and MSTU improvements along from US 41, Davis Blvd, and Linwood Ave major community roadways, including Bayshore • Multi-modal connectivity: Drive, Thomasson Drive, and Hamilton Avenue • Across Davis Blvd • Access to Bayview Park • Between Mini Triangle, Linwood Ave, pro- 6. North Bayshore posed retention pond park, and eastern • Corridor commercial development along Bayshore Triangle neighborhood Drive, including Haldeman Creek Entertainment • To Downtown Naples potentially via Davis District near Creek and creative parking solutions Blvd, US 41, and Gordon River Bridge im • Larger redevelopment opportunities of 17-Acre provements Site and Dees 24 property • Additional infrastructure improvements: sanitary • Arts and culture oriented development sewers, electrical, stormwater • Transitional elements between corridor commer- 2. Shadowlawn cial and residential areas in along Bayshore Drive • Residential structural enhancement and upgrades and Thomasson Drive • Avoidance of incompatible uses • Development of vacant residential lots • Transitional elements between different uses • Complete Street design along Bayshore Drive and 5-3-70 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENT9 A 5.3 Thomasson Drive, including Bayshore Drive/ Thomasson Drive roundabout • Neighborhood Complete Streets and trails • Connections between Sugden Regional Park and CRA area • Water main and fire suppression upgrades • Flooding and drainage on neighborhood streets 7. South Bayshore • Mobile home and single-family home residential improvements, upgrades, affordability • Development of vacant residential lots • Access to Bayview Park • Connections between CRA and uses to the east, including East Naples Community Park • Wetland, flooding, and site preparation considera- tions for development • Roadway improvements to meet County engineer- ing standards • Neighborhood Complete Streets 4,11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 . 5-3-71 5.3 9 A PLANNING FRAMEWORK & ELEMENTS This page is intentionally left blank. 5-3-72 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PRIORITIZATION PLAN is \,,,,,,.1, ,„‘, \v,‘ ;V' * ,-; *-.1...1,140r #4,$. ' , f . fl k� s s ,a4 ¢£� '*Apr > i..'v �" • •.- a ` s ` J t, l� P ir r T r . 99pi + 0,t, t ' ..;......,?•••-- - 'Ail) /if;, -;• ,1,-- ' k%- .,,,:*, ,,, p ,,,3,• ... 1, • / 4 � kN'.74p,� � ,,� [ , "*.+ ' ' t‘ dor ' ' "1. - 4- 7ii:**44 - - -- , v v fit ` f+} ,f A , ,,,, y T s s ,* . r a�t fits tj 'r1 'I 4!, '; x.. ::,*, � s / e }. 1 . ,r fi v hr N1/4, 4 , . ,,,. .,,,,„,...,„ ,....,,,,„, ,,,,, „,,,,, ''—`1P- 1'4444 4.4. s'' .* - I'''.4k... .s., 7' „ ,..*: , 2, 5A „,..,.. . fir}} &�,r � r �a A. �'. .., r fez. 7, s'�.�„ `p,e !r ISr*.."r4 d p},b,: , >r "" �• „, n A •l r ^. � 'r S r i t 1 t�; .1 ,f. "'�. R ya.s, y r M x�'.*40 Z ' i �'t R .�_� v!►*.+ti .t,'�a\t»s:^.»as •+`.i�."' t r^ .° ..^.'L�?`f��"": >.°��.... :.:a,,, 5.4 I A PRIORITIZATION PLAN z 5.4.1 Prioritization of Projects 5.4.2 Financing Plan Initiatives An important revenue source over the next 11 years � following plan approval is tax increment financing (TIF) The CRA will need to evaluate and implement or revenue generated by the property within the CRA coordinate on a number of capital improvement area.The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA area is able projects and planning, administrative, and regulatory to use county ad valorem tax revenues generated initiatives to carry out the framework of goals, above the base-year amount(the increment) to apply objectives, and strategies presented in Section 5.3. to projects and initiatives identified in this Since these projects and initiatives cannot be Redevelopment Area Plan. evaluated and carried out all at once, this section Figure 5-4-1 shows the historic revenue trends and presents a prioritization plan in terms of amount of projected revenues through 2030 based on a low funds programmed and project/initiative timing. A key <' consideration for prioritization is the amount of growth scenario that follows the County's historic �; growth trends with a 5.2%assumed average annual funding available for these projects and initiatives, growth rate, a medium growth scenario that assumes discussed more in Section 5.4.2. Other prioritization a 5.6%average annual growth rate, and a high growth criteria to consider that were primarily highlighted in scenario that assumes a 6.0%average annual growth the public outreach process include: rate. For more information on the development of • Funding availability from dedicated or outside growth scenarios, methods of revenue calculation, sources (aside from CRA funds) and detailed revenue tables, see Section 5.6. • Magnitude of anticipated impact and multiplier Certain parts of the CRA area are also designated as effects Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTUs), which utilize • Whether planning has already been undertaken or an additional ad valorem tax for specific purposes. completed The CRA can evaluate the opportunity to coordinate with the MSTUs to provide eligible projects proposed Other considerations that received sizable positive in this CRA plan. responses during the public outreach process included: The Bayshore Beautification MSTU, created in 1997, applies to most of the CRA area south of US 41 (see 7 • Project timing considerations independent of Map 5-4-1); revenues from this tax are focused on prioritization (e.g., Haldeman Creek dredging streetscape and right-of-way improvements(including should account for timeframe of sediment build- right-of-way maintenance), with some additional up, a stormwater master plan should be provisions for use of funds on other public realm completed before stormwater improvement improvements in the MSTU area. Figure 5-4-2 shows projects) projected revenues through 2030 using the following • Ability to address health/safety concerns average annual taxable value growth rate scenarios (see Section 5.6 for more information and detailed Additional considerations recommended by the revenue tables): project team based on the Redevelopment Area Plan update process include: • Low: 3.98% A • Degree of need • Medium:4.18% • Geographic distribution of projects in the CRA • High:4.52% area A Haldeman Creek MSTU (see Map 5-4-2) was created • Priorities identified during public outreach for the in 2006 for maintenance dredging and navigational Redevelopment Area Plan marker maintenance within the MSTU boundary. ''" ",,, Figure 5-4-3 shows projected revenues through 2030 . using the following average annual taxable value 5-4-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 44, PRIORITIZATION PLAN 7 n5.4 KIfaKWOOD AVE I INWOOD AVE 11,E 147/ 16 8( i�,t•. 41 City pf)? 5 , Naples Sugden Regional Park r3arale; • Last Naples BcEtani�al Community i:arders Park Park PRA Boundary Bayshore Beautification MSTU Park VVotlands Li City of Na Wes 5 Map 5-4-1:Bayshore Beautification MSTU Area Note:includes a boundary extension on Thomasson east of the CRA boundary that was pending approval during the development of this Redevelop- ment Area Plan. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-2 5.4 9 A PRIORITIZATION PLAN 2018: Base $5,000,000 Year $4,361,000 $4,500,000 ,v $4,000,000 .ter $4,128,000 yk, $3,500,000 $3,927,000 $3,000,000 ` ,. $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 --- $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 —Low —Medium ---High Figure 5-4-1:CRA TIF Revenue Scenarios Note:The TIF funding will sunset in 2030,so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. 53,000,000 $2,490,000 $2,500,000 52,000,000 , _.�. $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 —Low —Medium -----High a i Figure 5-4-2:Bayshore Beautification MSTU Revenue Scenarios Note:The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030.However,for the purposes of this planning effort,no projections have been made for years after 2030. 1111 $250,000 $218,000 fi $200,000 „..�-^^'"" ,w .-«�*$202,000 $187,000 $150,000 _ ! $100,000 $50,000 $0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 —Low —Medium ---^High Figure 5-4-3:Haldeman Creek MSTU Revenue Scenarios Note:The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030.However,for the purposes of this planning effort,no projections have been made for years after 2030. 5-4-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 9 A 5.4 A KIRK WOOD Av—EDAVIS BLVD--- - 184 1, oc , 0 LINWOOD AVE z — r---7---..1.; N 0 — ''ItitiVONtik4 , cr .,,, ,,, i 0 0 ‘447.51ir I 'Ns, I b n , ! 1 '11"1"o 1 ,,..„ '(it y pi it 1.,„ti I in Naples *I!, ac W I.,.,„,.. . BARRETT AV1 N, or. c...-.) — ,.., cr c x cz 14//ivo ,r, c,,,,rdpfi o 57 cn I,Z) •,c '2. ‘...) ... .. THOMASSON,DR ..,-, , , ..:.: KAREN ft ! . _ Last Naplet, Naples Community Botanical Park 1 (,,1 rcieti 1 Baysmw . . .. Park I 1 f L.r—, j CPA Bovndoisi t-iaidornan Crook MSTU i Park . I Wetlands 1 i L:City of Naples , 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111t.ii, I ' Map 5-4-2:Haldeman Creek MSTU Area Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-4 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 9 A ..,;,.. ,:„.. growth rate scenarios (see Section 5.6 for more and procurement guidelines adopted by the Collier information and detailed revenue tables): County Board of Commissioners if TIF revenues are to • Low: 4.01% be used for funding. Approval by relevant decision- making bodies is required for other funding sources �� • Medium:4.21% outside of TIF. • High: 4.55% Projects may require additional vetting and piloting to `. Note that the MSTUs do not have a sunset date and better understand technical feasibility, impacts, and will likely continue past 2030. However, for the broader County implementation priorities prior to . purposes of the capital and non-capital planning effort, no projections have been made for years after approval for implementation.To this end, planned 2030. projects include technical feasibility studies and pilot i.' Other potential funding sources that may be identified projects. As a result, this capital and non capital j, to supplement the funds above include grants and funding plan is subject to change as it is re-evaluated. fundingfrom partnerships(other agencies andprivate Additional) the Plan sets a framework based on �� p pg y, funders). There may also be opportunities in the current conditions but also allows for flexibility in the ;gig future to take on additional debt to pay for capital phasing of projects based on funding opportunities projects with a plan for repayment; note however that no debt will be taken on for the purposes of future and community priorities identified in annual work ': property acquisition, based on direction from the plans and capital improvement project lists. Board of County Commissioners. More information on Table 5-4-1 summarizes total projected revenues for coordination and partnerships, including those for various funds operating in the CRA area (including funding opportunities, is discussed in Section 5.4.4. p g 41 ; MSTUs)through 2030. Note that following the 5A.3 Projects & Initiatives successful sale of the Mini Triangle property anticipated in the first five years, it is expected that `' Prioritization the CRA will have additional funds of$350,000 Based on available funding and prioritization available that are currently being held in reserve due considerations, this section sets out a prioritization to loan requirements. plan recommending projects for the period through Figures 5-4-4 and 5-4-5 summarize capital and non- 2030 (11 years after the adoption of the amended capital project costs broken down by timeframe and Plan),the period for which tax increment financing type of project/initiative, followed by Tables 5-4-2 (TIF) funding will be available.The remaining project through 5-4-4 which provide a detailed list of projects recommendations are included for longer term and initiatives.Table 5-4-5 compares projected TIF implementation post-2030 and will require alternative revenues and costs. Note that the planning includes a funding sources aside from TIF. The Plan provides an built-in deficit to indicate where other agencies would overview of potential alternative funding sources. likely help fund projects or other revenue sources might be sought, including once the TIF revenues This Plan does not obligate any funding to any projects listed. It provides a guide and list of both capital and cease in 2030. Regarding maintenance costs, non-capital projects that require approval by the CRA maintenance of standard capital improvements is �: anticipated to be provided and funded by relevant Advisory Board within the initial 11-year programming period and allocation through the standard operating County agencies, while maintenance for capital ' 5-4-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A,',,'5A PRIORITIZATION PLAN improvements above and beyond County standards are housing for artists anticipated to be funded by the CRA. • Bay St Complete Street Improvements— neighborhood-level Complete Streets Short Term (1-5 Years) improvements between Hamilton Ave and the end Capital Projects of the roadway • Linwood Ave Complete Street Phase I —major • Surface Parking Lot in Bayshore Area—to increase Complete Street improvement between available commercial parking Commercial Dr and Wild Pines Ln including on- • General Road Engineering Improvements on Pine street parking, lighting, sidewalk widening, and any Tree Dr and Andrews Dr—to bring these roadways '''' additional needed infrastructure improvements up to minimum County standards It,, • Thomasson Dr and Hamilton Ave Improvements— • Jeepers Dr Complete Street Improvements— itt Bayshore Beautification MSTU anticipated to fund neighborhood Complete Streets improvements project, but any shortfall could trigger partnership between Bayshore Dr and Sugden Regional Park, k . with CRA funding portion including walk lane striping, upgraded bioswales, • Republic Dr Complete Streets Improvements— lighting, and a pedestrian connection to Sugden j ., neighborhood-level Complete Streets Regional Park f improvements between Bayshore Dr and East • Gateway Intersection Design Improvements: Naples Community Park, including lighting, possible • Davis Blvd/Airport-Pulling Rd sidewalk expansion, any necessary drainage • Davis Blvd/Shadowlawn Dr li, improvements, and an improved pedestrian bridge • Davis Blvd/US 41 connection to East Naples Community Park • US 41/Shadowlawn Dr/Bayshore Dr—sign • Danford St Complete Streets Improvements— improvements in the right-of-way and neighborhood-level Complete Streets median areas with an opportunity to improvements between the end of the roadway showcase public art ; and Hamilton Ave • Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements in CRA area • General Parks Improvements in Bayshore Area— —signs to address branding and bicycle/pedestrian general item to address connections to parks and movement amenities, including any associated with the 17- • Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Program —program Acre Site and Sugden Regional Park to address gaps in the pedestrian and bicycle # • Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood infrastructure networks that are not addressed Initiatives General Improvements—general item to through Complete Streets improvements address capital improvements from Community p p Other General Multi-Modal Improvements—for Safety&Clean-Up Strategy and Neighborhood additional multi-modal amenities (e.g., bus Focus Initiatives; may include projects identified shelters) based on neighborhood interest to coordinate with • Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/ the Sheriffs Department and Code Enforcement to Improvements educate and provide small capital improvements • Sanitary Sewer Line Upgrades in Triangle Area—to • Land Acquisition for a Community Land Trust—may increase capacity support maintenance of current affordable housing • Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades—to availability in the CRA area while improving address infrastructure age and flow requirements baseline quality conditions; may also support Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-6 ,_ 9 A 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN Non-Capital Expenditures what mains and hydrants will be updated and • Ongoing Operating Expenses for CRA, including phasing staff and administration costs • Triangle Retention Pond Feasibility Study—finalized design and engineering forpassive park • Process Improvements—updated bylaws for CRA g g g Advisory Board improvements • Land Development Code Updates- based on • Other Non-Capital Operations and Study recommendations from CRA Plan Update Expenditures—may include a study to expand the • Mini Triangle Development—funding for incentives CRA boundary, non-capital costs associated with , and other needed support for the development of Community Safety& Clean-Up Plan, non-capital the Mini Triangle costs from Neighborhood Focus Initiatives, or other • 17-Are Development—funding for incentives and expenditures that may arise in the future and are � not yet identified. other needed support for the development of the 17-Acre Site. • Grants and Programs • Gateway Property Development—funding for • Residential Grant/Loan Programs—for ` potential incentive in support of the project at the structural improvements to single-family apex of Davis Boulevard and Us 41. homes •,; • Stormwater Master Plan Update—identify primary, • Commercial Facade Program—for areas secondary, and tertiary improvements needed in that are not a major focus for commercial the CRA area with a prioritization plan redevelopment but that can be enhanced • • Arts and Culture Plan for CRA Area with exterior façade and structural • Complete Streets Implementation Plan improvements m • Bayview Parking Study—concepts and outreach in • Wall & Fence Funding—for transitional coordination with Parks & Recreation Division structures between incompatible uses y= • Community Safety&Cleanup Strategy—strategy to . Public Art Funding—for public art pieces and events address code enforcement issues and community • Economic Development Incentives Program —for safety economic development incentives related to • Branding Strategy Section 5.3.4 of the Redevelopment Area Plan • Marketing and Communication Strategy— • Bayshore Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study strategies to communicate outcomes from the • Mobile Home Replacement Fund -for transition of branding effort and connect with the various mobile homes to modular homes or other communities in the CRA area (including hard-to appropriate structures reach groups) with updated tools including the • Community Land Trust Housing Construction website, e-blast templates, marketing materials, . Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments etc. • Market Study/Economic Profile • Bayshore Dr Pilot project—for Complete Street implementation • Water& Fire Update Strategy—documentation of s m 5-4-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 PRIORITIZATION PLA9 5.4 Long-Term (After 11 Years) and US 41, including lighting and any additional Capital Projects needed infrastructure improvements • Gateway Intersection Design Improvements— i.i. • Triangle Retention Pond Improvements signage and potential public art opportunities for: implementation of passive park improvements at • Thomasson Dr/Dominion Dr the pond site with any necessary drainage and • US 41/Osceola Ave connectivity improvements • General Road Engineering Improvements—to bring • Land Acquisition and Development for Six Pocket the following roads up to minimum County Parks(small neighborhood parks) standards: • Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood • Woodside Ave Initiatives General Improvements •• Holly Ave • Land Acquisition for a Community Land Trust • palmetto Ct `i • Surface Parking Lot in the Mini Triangle area to • Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Program support commercial uses • Other General Multi Modal Improvements • Development of Multi-Purpose Facility/Structure— • Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades—to may occur on currently CRA-owned 17-Acre Site; address age and flow requirements potential uses of the facility/structure may include • Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/ a CRA office and/or arts/incubator space �'., Improvements • Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail along Sugden • Undergrounding Utilities—along Bayshore Dr Regional Park Drainage Ditch to provide north/ between US 41 and Holly Ave, coordinated with south connectivity the Complete Streets project and Bayshore :' • Commercial Parking Garage on Bayshore Dr- Beautification MSTU; Linwood Ave; and possibly on surface lot included in short-term Commercial Dr capital projects for commercial parking ' r • Bayshore Dr Complete Street Improvement • Bayshore Dr Complete Street—major Complete between Thomasson Dr and Holly Ave— I Street improvement between US 41 and neighborhood-level Complete Street, including any Thomasson Dr, including possible lane reduction, drainage improvements and connections to on street parking, and any additional needed potential Naples Bay Greenway Sun Trail infrastructure improvements improvements • Kirkwood Ave Complete Street—Complete Street • Commercial Parking Garage in Mini Triangle Area improvement potentially similar to Linwood Ave n possibly on Surface Lot included in Mid-Term Phase I with potential Shadowlawn Dr connection Capital Projects—to address commercial parking • Commercial Dr Complete Street—Complete Street needs . improvement potentially similar to Linwood Ave • Pine Street Connection—between Davis Blvd and Phase I Linwood Ave • Linwood Ave Complete Street Phase II— neighborhood Complete Street improvements ,' between Wild Pines Ln and Airport-Pulling Rd • Shadowlawn Dr Complete Street—major roadway Complete Street improvement between Davis Blvd Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-8 5.4 9 A PRIORITIZATION PLAN Non-Capital Expenditures • Land Development Code Updates • Bayshore Dr Technical Feasibility Study—for Complete Street implementation • Microenterprise and Arts Incubator Study—for concepts and implementation, which could include an arts focus and/or arts space • Other Non-Capital Operations and Study Expenditures—other expenditures that may arise in the future and are not yet identified • Grants and Programs • Residential Grant/Loan Programs—for structural improvements to single-family homes • Commercial Facade Program—for areas that are not a major focus for commercial redevelopment but that can be enhanced with exterior façade and structural improvements • Wall & Fence Funding—for transitional structures between incompatible uses • Public Art Funding—for public art pieces and events • Economic Development Incentives Program—for economic development incentives related to Section 5.3.4 of the Redevelopment Area Plan • Mobile Home Replacement Fund -for transition of mobile homes to modular 100 homes or other appropriate structures • Community Land Trust Housing Construction • Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments 5-4-9 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 officxzweiimit- art-Term Total Lon Tenn ', Fund Revenue �� y� ,,le kkl 1 11 Years) (After Tax Increment Financing(TIF) $33,790,000 $0 Bayshore Beautification MSTU $20,193,000 TBD Haldeman Creek MSTU $1,762,000 TBD Table 5-4-1:Summary of Projected Revenue Estimates Note:rounded to thousands 'The TIF funding will sunset in 2030,so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030. However,for the purposes of this planning effort, no projections have been made for years after 2030. Total Short-Term Costs Total Long-Term Costs (1-11 Years): (After 11 Years): $34.4 million $85.1 million Public Space,Parks, &Open Space, Land Use& $3,144,404,4% Land Use&Urban Public Space,Parks,&Open Space, Urban Design, Development, Design,$165,000,0% $1,050,000,3% $37,500,0% $4,062,500,5% Non-Capital, ...Development, $6,735,000,8% $1,000,000,3% / , i , / transportation, � � Connectivity,& / / Walkability, ' $6,759,785, nfrastructure, ' 20% $25,909,865,30% Non-Capital, Transportation, ni $21,881,116, Infrastructure, Connectivity,& 64% $3,525,695, Walkability, 10% $45,170,047,53% itid �G Figure 5-4-4:Short-term costs by project type Figure 5-4-5:Long-term costs by project type ss a1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-10 9 A 5.4 ' PRIORITIZATION PLAN North of US 41 (Triangle) Land Use&Urban Design Projects Total Short Term (1-11 Years) Long-Term , • Gateway Intersection Design Improvements Gateway Sign-Davis Blvd/Airport Pulling Rd $15,000 $15,000 Gateway Sign-Davis Blvd/Shadowlawn Dr $15,000 $15,000 Gateway Sign-Davis Blvd/US 41 $15,000 $15,000 Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements Wayfinding Sign Improvements $52,500 $52,500 Sub-Total $97,500 $97,500 $0 Public Space, Parks,&Open Space Projects Total Short Term (1-11 Years) (After 11 Year„ saw\ Park Improvements Triangle Retention Pond Improvements $818,049 $818,049 Land Acquisition for Pocket Parks(2 parks) $937,500 $937,500 Development of Pocket Parks(2 parks) $163,178 $163,178 Public Space Improvements Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood $87,500 $25,000 $62,500 Initiatives General Improvements Sub-Total $2,006,227 $25,000 $1,981,227 Long-"term Development Projects Total Short Term (1-5 Years) (After 11 Years) Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust $1,125,000 $500,000 $625,000 Sub-Total $1,125,000 $500,000 $625,000 Table 5-4-2:Capital Improvements Project Matrix—North of US 41(Triangle) 5-4-11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PRIORITIZATION PLAN .4 Transportation Connectivity, &Walkability Projects Total Short Term(1-11 Years) i ti . .� (After 11 Years) Complete Streets- Major Linwood Ave (Phase I) $1,674,075 $1,674,075 Shadowlawn Dr- Installation of Streetlights $412,500 $412,500 Commercial Dr $1,903,219 $1,903,219 Kirkwood Ave/Kirkwood Ave Connection $2,177,813 $2,177,813 Pine Street Connection $2,210,891 $2,210,891 Complete Streets&Trails-Neighborhood : I Linwood Ave (Phase II) $2,224,400 52,224,400 Parking Surface Parking Lot-Land Acquisition $937,500 $937,500 Surface Parking Lot—Mini Triangle Area-excludes $439,113 $439,113 land acquisition cost I Commercial Parking Garage(possibly on surface lot) —Triangle-excludes land acquisition cost $11,898,125 $11,898,125 General Multi-Modal Improvements General Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure ` Improvements $2,775,449 $430,622 $2,344,827 Other General Multi-Modal Improvements $875,000, $250,000 $625,000 Sub-Total $27,528,083 $2,354,697 $25,173,386 long-Term Infrastructure Projects Total Short Term (1-11 Years) (After 11 Years)1 Other Infrastructure Improvements Upgrade Sanitary Sewer Lines $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/Improvements $7,218,750 $250,000 $6,968,750 Underground Utility Lines-Linwood Ave $896,070 $896,070 Underground Utility Lines-Commercial Dr $237,926 $237,926 "' Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades $4,836,303 $482,801 $4,353,502 ' Sub-Total $14,189,049 $1,732,801 $12,456,248 Total North $44,945,859 $4,709,998 $40,235,861 @r; ' 'Overall costs increased by 25%to account for annual increases Table 5-4-2(continued):Capital Improvements Project Matrix—North of US 41(Triangle) p Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-12 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 9 A Soum sa r ? s ...a<.t"f.U S 41(Bayshore) .,: a � \y th ' '' s s ‘k4s4St; Land Use&Urban Design Projects Total Short Term(1-11 Yeats ,, ,. ‘� fi ,, . Gateway Intersection Design Improvements 4° Gateway Sign Improvements at US 41 and $15,000 $15,000 �.� Bayshore Gateway-Thomasson Dr/Dominion Dr3 $18,750 $18,750 r,,. Gateway US 41/0sceola3 $18,750 $18,750 Street Sign/Wayfinding Improvements Wayfinding Sign Improvements3 $52,500 $52,500 Sub-Total $105,000 $67,500 $37,500 t= Long Term a Public Space,Parks,&Open Space Projects Total Short Term (1-11 Years) 1 (After 11 YearS) Park Improvements Land Acquisition for Pocket Parks (2 parks) $937,500 $937,500 Development of Pocket Parks (2 parks) $163,178 $163,178 General Parks Development/Improvements $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Public Space Improvements Community Safety/Clean-Up and Neighborhood Initiatives General Improvements $87,500 $25,000 $62,500 Sub-Total $2,188,178 $1,025,000 $1,163,178 Development Projects Total Short Term (1-11 Years) Land Acquisition for Community Land Trust $1,125,000 $500,000 $625,000 Development of Multi-Purpose Facility/Structure $2,812,500 $2,812,500 Sub-Total $3,937,500 $500,000 $3,437,500 Table 5-4-3:Capital Improvements South of US 41(Bayshore) 5-4-13 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 • Transportation,Connectivity, &Walkability Projects Total Short Term (1-11 Years) Complete Streets-Major Bayshore Dr Complete Street—between US 41 and Thomasson2 $3,125,000 $3,125,000 Thomason Dr and Hamilton Improvements2 $500,000 $500,000 Complete Streets&Trails- Neighborhood Bicycle and pedestrian trail along Sugden drainage 2 $428,340 $428,340 ditch Jeepers Dr Complete Street Improvements2 $491,849 $491,849 Republic Dr Complete Streets improvements2 $506,849 $506,849 Danford St Complete Streets2 $689,329 $689,329 Bay St Complete Street Improvements2 $491,849 $491,849 Bayshore Dr Complete Street-Thomasson Dr/Holly Ave $2,500,000 $2,500,000 Parking Surface Parking Lot at Bayshore and Coco $351,290 $351,290 Commercial Parking Garage (possibly on surface lot) $9,893,500 $9,893,500 —Bayshore Dr General Road Engineering Standard Improvements General Road Engineering Improvements—Pine Tree Dr2 $346,649 $346,649 General Road Engineering Improvements- Andrews Dr2 $346,649 $346,649 General Road Engineering Improvements-Woodside $433,312 $433,312 Ave General Road Engineering Improvements- Holly 2 $433,312 $433,312 Ave General Road Engineering Improvements- Palmetto CtZ $213,371 $213,371 General Multi-Modal Improvements General Sidewalk/Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements 2 $2,775,449 $430,622 $2,344,827 Other General Multi-Modal Improvements2 $875,000 $250,000 $625,000 Sub-Total $24,401,748 $4,405,088 $19,996,660 Table 5-4-3(continued):Capital Improvements South of US 41(Bayshore) Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-14 5.4 9A PRIORITIZATION PLAN Long-Term .....,„„„:„, Infrastructure Projects "��A a Short Term (1-11 Years) 2 ,,, „e `: (After 11 Years) ..;11 Other Infrastructure Improvements Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades/Improvements2 $5,250,000 $250,000 $5,000,000 Water Line and Fire Suppression Upgrades $7,221,510 $1,542,894 $5,678,617 Underground Utility Lines-Bayshore Dr2 $2,775,000 $2,775,000 Sub-Total $15,246,510 $1,792,894 $13,453,617 Total South $45,878,936 $7,790,481 $38,088,455 Overall Capital Costs Total $90,824,795 $12,500,480 $78,324,316 Non-Capital Costs Total $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 Total Costs $119,440,911 $34,381,595 $85,059,316 1 Overall costs increased by 25%to account for annual increases 2 Potentially MSTU-eligible project;requires coordination and approval of Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory Board. Table 5-4-3(continued):Capital Improvements South of US 41(Bayshore) 5-4-15 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 i 9 A PRIORITIZATION PLAN 5.4 Non-Capital Expenditures(Studies,Plans,Other) Operations and Studies Short Term Long-Term Project Total (1-11 Years) (After 11 Years)' Process Improvements-updated bylaws for CRA Advisory Board $25,000 $25,000 Staff and Operating(salaries,benefits,rent,etc.)2 $16,626,116 $16,626,116 Land Development Code Updates-based on recommendations from CRA Plan $100,000 $75,000 $25,000 Update Mini Triangle Development Support $500,000 $500,000 17-Acre Development Support 5500,000 $500,000 Gateway Property Support $100,000 5100,000 Stormwater Master Plan Update 5200,000 $200,000 Arts and Culture Plan for CRA $75,000 $75,000 Complete Streets Implementation Plan $50,000 $50,000 Bayview Parking Study-concepts and outreach in coordination with Parks $25,000 $25,000 &Recreation Division Community Safety&Cleanup Strategy to address code enforcement issues $15,000 $15,000 and community safety. Marketing,Branding and communication strategy-website update,e-blast $50,000 $50,000 templates,marketing materials,etc. Market Study/Economic Profile $50,000 $50,000 Bayshore Drive Technical Feasibility Study $40,000 $40,000 Bayshore Drive Pilot project $15,000 $15,000 Water&Fire Update Strategy-document what mains and hydrants will be $50,000 $50,000 updated and phasing Triangle Retention Pond Feasibility Study $25,000 $25,000 Microenterprise and arts incubator Study for concepts and implementation 520,000 $20,000 Other non-capital operations and study expenditures $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 Grants and Programs Short Term Long Term Project Total (1-11 Years) (After 11 Years)' Residential Grant/Loan Programs-for structural Improvements to single- $375,000 $125,000 $250,000 family homes Commercial Facade Program 5750,000 $250,000 $500,000 Wall&Fence Funding-for funding transitional structures between $375,000 $125,000 $250,000 incompatible uses Public Art-funding for public art pieces and events $225,000 $75,000 $150,000 Economic Development-funding for economic development incentives $375,000 $125,000 $250,000 listed in Development Section Mobile Home Replacement Fund $1,500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 Community Land Trust Housing Construction $4,800,000 $1,800,000 $3,000,000 Other Affordable/Workforce Housing Investments $1,250,000 $250,000 $1,000,000 Totals $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 'Assumes a 25%cost increase to account inflation and other potential cost increases o o wtn 'Assumes no staff and operating costs after the end of the TIE collection period in 2030 Table 5-4-4:Non Capital Expenditures te...., Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-May 2019 5-4-16 5.4 PLAN 9 A PRIORITIZATION ��• - Short-Term Long- TIF Funding Summary Total Overall (14,f bears) (After ,� Total Capital Costs -North of US 41 (Triangle) $44,945,859 $4,709,998 $40,235,861 Total Capital Costs-South of US 41(Bayshore) $45,878,936 $7,790,481 $38,088,455 Total Capital Costs $90,824,795 $12,500,480 $78,324,316 Total Non-Capital Costs $28,616,116 $21,881,116 $6,735,000 Total TIF Revenue $33,790,000 $33,790,000 $0 Difference -$85,650,911 -$591,595 -$85,059,316 Table 5-4-5:Summary of CRA Project Costs and Projected TIF Revenues Notes:revenues rounded to thousands loverall costs increased by 25%to account for annual increases. The TIF funding will sunset in 2030,so no TIF revenues are shown after 11 years. 5.4.4 Coordination & Partnerships Many of the items listed in the Section 5.3 framework and capital and non-capital projects listed in this section require the CRA to seek approval from and coordinate with other agencies and entities, which may include planning and process approval and/or coordination and identifying opportunities for shared funding. Coordination also includes instances in which another agency or entity oversees a project or initiative directly with the CRA assisting. As mentioned in Section 5.4.3, the framework and projects identified in this plan are suggestions to be further vetted prior to approval for implementation.This includes review and approval from relevant County staff and elected officials. Planning and implementation may also include broader coordination with agencies. Examples include coordination with the Collier MPO to share local needs that might inform a state roadway improvement, as well as coordinating with other Collier County agencies on topics such as Land Development Code changes, park access, community safety, transit and transportation, and stormwater. The CRA also has opportunities to coordinate with the City of Naples on transportation planning and water main upgrades.This type of coordination might involve design review for projects led by the CRA and setting up meetings coinciding with regular planning and project cycles prior to finalized design phases. Key planning cycles for coordination include the Transportation Improvement Program planning by the MPO and capital improvement planning for Collier County. When working with agencies to identify shared funding opportunities as a part of these planning and implementation processes, it is important to recognize existing funding commitments, as well as limitations on the use of funds. For example, road impact fees in Collier County must be used for capacity expansion, such as adding a new road or new lanes to an existing road. 5-4-17 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A-- 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN Aside from government agencies, the CRA may also have opportunities to partner with local entities such as private firms and non-profits to realize some of its strategies and projects, as well as seek private sponsorships Examples include potentially partnering with the Naples Accelerator, St. Matthew's House, and/or the United Arts Council on a business/art incubator idea.There may also be opportunities to partner with companies such as Slidr for alternative vehicle transportation in the area. Coordination and funding opportunities may also be identified as part of private development projects. Lastly, as mentioned at the beginning of this section, the CRA should look for opportunities to coordinate with the MSTUs operating in the area to implement capital improvements. Table 5-4-6 shows the costs for projects in the CRA prioritization plan that may qualify for Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds and compares them to the projected revenues for the MSTU through 2030; note that revenues beyond this timeframe are considered "to be determined" depending on when the projects are implemented.The comparison shows that the money available would cover these project costs with a sizable amount of funds remaining for other MSTU projects. Note that the MSTU Advisory Board would need to approve any process or funding coordination. MSTU Funding Summary Total Overall Short-Term Long erm j ( , �� dears Aft, Total Capital Costs-MSTU-Eligible Projects $14,261,958 $4,121,297 $10,140,660 Total Right-of-Way MSTU Revenue2 $20,193,000 $20,193,000 TBD Difference $5,931,042 $16,071,703 -$10,140,660 Table 5-4-6:Summary of MSTU-Eligible Costs and Projected MSTU Revenues Note:Projects are considered MSTU-eligible based on those that align with accepted uses of Bayshore Beautification MSTU funds ac- cording to Ordinance No.2013-68;revenues rounded to thousands 'Overall costs increased by 25%to account for annual increases 2The MSTUs do not have a sunset date and will likely continue past 2030.However,for the purposes of this planning effort,no projec- tions have been made for years after 2030. 4S sl Sri Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-4-18 5.4 PRIORITIZATION PLAN 9 This page is intentionally left blank. 5-4-19 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A GENERAL REQUIREMENTS , „ „ ,...,.. ... „„ . ., ,,,,,,..„,,, , ., ..., ,,,,,.,,,,,,:,..„,.. .‘, „ \\ ,\ \‘, \, \ \ \:\\\ \'N', •R ,cep`^ "h qw' : " \ A\\ - P \i\`.��`�\\�\\\ *A c. '",»„ \vim., s a ,,� S 1 : Y• \_ .+ :.. �` a �l _ 'S Y 4, +Kc w : i'..4(0 10 Si I I h. .'''l kr\ ' m ry l •f 1 F l ea <. ' ","' stit 4 ___,—,44:4016 400;fir ..,..,,t;.4",:,,,-4,1.;.•..".‘44„.. ,4',•;,,""44-!.'t, '4.-- -)4,.T"Z---" i----. , . ,.„,,,,,p.:,::.,::0:4,..;,,!e04;,.,,,z.,,t,,...4..:,... ciy, ,, , ,..„ . .:...:!..4 .44.4'...^'.Y.'r' ' '..- , r• . 4,v . • M.' * , r,I r E, r errs'►, � •L' , ,. , ..,-:,,, ..,•*".`,. .. ..1:r.i-k- 114.- ',0-. .";-41040:".•:•31. ";- .-: b'. :.,'.$A: ' ' ...;i.''.••‘ ',• • ...'"Afr,.4t '' . ,, . jor ,-IF:-,:;,...-• (-4„, • * ••.. . ;r.. , ;: 4(j, '--''',:',:,iS.-;`411it•- 1,rtv 5 . 5 • � Jr.,' � , t Y. :tit ititi r 5.5 9A GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ` Overview of Relevant development and providing identified needed public uses. If a property is designated for acquisition, the tatuteSi process must comply with County requirements and/ or State statutes. Community redevelopment areas are created on the basis of a finding of blight or slum conditions, as noted The Redevelopment Agency is authorized to demolish, in Section 163.355 of Florida Statute. Table 5-2-1 clear, or move buildings, structures, and other , provided detailed blight conditions for the Bayshore improvements from any real property acquired in the Gateway Triangle CRA area, summarizing information redevelopment project area, subject to obtaining "' from the 2000 Plan.Table 5-5-1 shows how the necessary permits. framework in this Redevelopment Area Plan addresses The CRA may also engage in or assist in site m"I the main blight factors identified. Related capital and preparation improvements on properties it alreadyprojects non-capital can also be found in Section 5.4. p owns or properties it acquires in the future to ` In addition, sections 163.360 and 163.362 of Florida facilitate development. Other improvements include Statutes contain specific requirements for community general infrastructure and streetscape improvements redevelopment plans. Tables 5-5-2 and 5-5-3 provide that indirectly support development. See Section 5.4.3 an overview of the requirements from these statutes for those improvements that are planned for the CRA and the location in this Redevelopment Area Plan to fund.All of these improvements are subject to where the relevant information can be found to satisfy obtaining necessary permits. t these requirements. Section 1.5 further outlines the Agency's authorities that governs this area. 1.4 5.5.2 Consistency with the ,: County's Comprehensive Plan 5.5.4 Zoning & Compre si t, This Redevelopment Area Plan sets forth a vision for Plan Changes the CRA area centered on fostering more urban-style No Growth Management Plan or Land Development development, including multi-modal corridors, mixed Code changes were brought through an approval use projects, and building out to allowable densities. process as part of this planning effort, and no Land The Collier County Growth Management Plan largely Development Code or Comprehensive Plan changes ' supports this vision with the Bayshore Gateway are being adopted with the adoption of this Triangle Redevelopment Overlay provisions and the Redevelopment Area Plan. However, recommended Activity Center designation.The Mixed Use overlays changes will be brought for initial consistency review provided in the Land Development Code further by Collier County staff and the Collier County Planning support these efforts. Development and Commission following adoption of this plan. redevelopment are thus largely intended to be , . completed within the provisions of the Growth 5.5.5 Land Use, Densities, Management Plan as they exist now or indicate where future amendments may be needed in order to carry Building Requirements out implementation of action items. As noted in Section 5.5.4, no Land Development Code or Comprehensive Plan changes are being adopted 5.5.3 Acquisition, Demolition/ q with the adoption of this Redevelopment Area Plan. Clearance & Imt�rovement Consequently, the Redevelopment Area Plan will N follow the land uses, densities, and building In the future, the Redevelopment Agency may choose requirements provided in the Growth Management to pursue a program of property acquisition and/or Plan and the Land Development Code for the time consolidation to realize the redevelopment objectives. being. However, recommended changes will be These objectives might relate to facilitating private brought forth for initial consistency review by Collier ', e mu 4� 5-5-1 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 A . GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5.5 ,‘,,,,,,:::,,,,..,, ,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,.,,„,,,,,,,,,,,‘,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,w,xt: ::tiNly4,,,,,,,,A,,,,Aitgnsvizo ,0gkoosvo, sk ,sq.....,,,,,,„.„,,:s.,,„g„,„,,,,„,,,,,‘,..,,,,,,,„„,,, „,,,,,,„:„.„,*:,,„.,,,, ,,„,,,,,,, \wtkvt:,,\44.1e%upomk4itotu4,tzivo, e Ian Sections) `V " Predominance of Section 5.3.5 addresses street design primarily with Complete Streets initiatives; defective or inadequate there are additional improvements for addressing bicycle and pedestrian gaps, street layout commercial parking need, and additional bicycle and pedestrian connections. Section 5.3.4 focuses on specifically on facilitating private development. As part of Faulty lot layout in these efforts, the CRA can acquire property to merge lots and make them more relation to size, easily developed. Additionally, Section 5.3.2 lays out examples of multi-family adequacy, accessibility, residential that provide examples to achieve higher residential densities where or usefulness approved densities are not realized. Sections 5.3.3 and 5.3.4 contain strategies to address structural upgrades and public realm clean-up and improvements. Sections 5.3.2 and 5,3.4 also address residential Unsanitary or unsafe 4, types and approaches to affordability that can address overcrowding. Section 5.3.5 conditions highlights lighting and other transportation safety improvements, particularly for cyclists and pedestrians. , Deterioration of site or other improvements Section 5.3.6 focuses on infrastructure improvements, including those for (drainage and surface stormwater. water management) Other problems: Lack of '" right-of-way for Section 5.3.5 includes improvements for Shadowlawn Drive. Shadowlawn Drive ,, i improvements Other problems: Lack of Section 5.3.5 includes a coordination strategy for public transit in the CRA area. public transportation ,. Other problems: housing Section 5.3.4 includes example strategies to address housing affordability issues. affordability Table 5-5-1:Sections of Redevelopment Area Plan that address blight conditions Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-5-2 R ....„,. 9A " 55 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS I, Relevant Redevelopment Area i Section 3.360, F.S. Requirements i _ Plan Section e� Conformity to the Growth Management Plan Section 5.5.2 Zoning and planning changes Section 5.5.4 Section 5.3.1, Maps 5-3-5 and 5- 3-6, Section 5.5.5;for general Land uses, maximum densities, and building requirements considerations to guide these requirements, see Section 5.3.2 Land acquisition, demolition, clearance and site preparation, redevelopment, improvements, and rehabilitation proposed to carry out Sections 5.4.3 and 5.5.3 the Redevelopment Area Plan I Affordable housing provision Section 5.3.4-Objective 5 aiu: Table 5-5-2:Section 163.360,F.S.Requirements for Redevelopment Area Plan ' sf 'iq j 4 c - ;i 1. a T 5 5-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9A5 ,GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Relevant Redevelopment Area Section 163.362, F.S. Requirements Plan Section Legal description of CRA area boundaries and reason behind establishing Resolution 2000 82, Exhibit A at end of this document and such boundaries Resolution 2000-83 Approximate amount of open space to be provided shown by diagram and Section 5.3.3-Table 5-3-1 and in general terms Map 5-3-8 Property intended for parks and recreation space shown by diagram and in general terms Section 5.3.3-Map 5-3-8 Street layout and property intended for streets shown by diagram and in general terms Section 5.3.5-Map 5-3-14 Section 5.3.1, Maps 5-3-5 and 5- Limitations on the type, size, height, number, and proposed use of 3-6, Section 5.5.5;for general buildings shown by diagram and in general terms considerations to guide these requirements, see Section 5.3.2 The approximate number of dwelling units shown by diagram and in general terms Section 5.3.2-Map 5-3-2 Replacement housing and relocation Section 5.3.4, Section 6 Property intended for public utilities shown by diagram and in general Section 5.3.6-Maps 5-3-15 and 5 terms -3-16 Section 5.3.1-Map 5-3-1, Section 5.4.2; additional details Property for public improvements of any nature shown by diagram and in in Section 5.3.2 Map 5 3 7, Section 5.3.3-Map 5-3-8, Section general terms 5.3.4-Map 5-3-10, Section 5.3.5- Maps 5-3-12 and 5-3-14, Section 5.3.6-Maps 5-3-15 and 5-3-16 Neighborhood impact element describing impacts on residents of CRA area and surrounding areas in terms of relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilities and services, Section 5.5.6 effect on school population, and other matters affecting the physical and social quality of the neighborhood Publicly funded capital improvements to be undertaken in the CRA area Section 5.4.2 Safeguards, controls, restrictions/covenants Section 5.5.7 Replacement housing for relocation of displaced persons from housing facilities Section 6 Residential use element Section 5.3.2, Section 5.3.4- Objective 5 Projected costs of redevelopment Section 5.4.3 Redevelopment Area Plan duration and time certain for redevelopment financed by increment revenues Section 1.6 Table 5-5-3:Section163.362,F.S.Requirements for Redevelopment Area Plan Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-5-4 5.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 9 A QU REMENTS County,,,,, „„ staff and the Collier CountyPlanningexistingCollier County process to assess and mitigate Commission. for Level of Service changes. Regarding environmental quality, water quality is a key consideration for stormwater management .6 Neighborhood Impact improvements. Water quality impacts can be evaluated through existing Collier County processes. Additionally, The Redevelopment Area Plan focuses on improving this Redevelopment Area Plan encourages green structural quality of buildings, compatibility of uses, infrastructure techniques that mayhelpprovide certain and urban design, as well as promoting more urban q levels of localized water treatment and ground style development and multi-modal transportation. As infiltration prior to arriving at major collector sites. , of right now, there is housing available at lower income levels, yet this may be due to lower structural quality :, based on findings from the background analysis for the Redevelopment Area Plan. As improvements are made 5.5.7 Safeguards, Controls ;, in the area, there is a potential risk of property values � rising to make housing substantially less affordable. Restrictions, & Assurances Consequently, q y, protective measures are being Redevelopment activities identified in this considered to maintain the affordability of these units Redevelopment Area Plan will not be initiated until while improving their quality(see Section 5.3.4, they are found to be consistent with the Collier County r Objective 5).Temporary relocation of residents in Growth Management Plan and applicable land lower quality units may be required to make building development regulations. The Community `' improvements. Redevelopment Agency, working collaboratively with An additional consideration for lower income County agencies, may propose amendments to the households with improvements to the CRA area is the Growth Management Plan and the Land Use ' availability of community facilities and services. These Development Code, including design criteria, building uses may also risk displacement if property values heights, land coverage, setback requirements, special increase rapidly or dramatically. This Redevelopment exceptions, traffic circulation, traffic access, and other Area Plan includes provisions to support community- development and design controls necessary for proper oriented uses that include these facilities and services development of public and private projects. so that they can remain a part of the community(see To leverage the increment revenues, Collier County Section 5.3.4, Objective 3, Strategy 2). may consider non-ad valorem assessments. For With more urban-style development and multi-modal example, during the Redevelopment Area Plan update improvements, traffic circulation may change. There process, the County was working on a stormwater may be increased congestion on roadways and at major utility fee that, if adopted, would apply to the CRA area. The imposition of special assessments for capital , state road intersections in making them safer for non automobile modes and pursuing catalyst development improvements and essential services is covered by well opportunities.Any development would need to go settled case law and specific statutory provisions authorizing collection of non-ad valorem assessments through the existing Collier County process to assess on the same bill as ad valorem taxes. Such provisionsand mitigate for Level of Service changes on roadways. require extraordinary notice to all affected property Ensuring low-cost transportation alternatives may also ; support affordable mobility for lower income owners. households and community members. Issues concerning restrictions on any property acquired for community redevelopment purposes and then d. Regarding impacts on other facilities, such as schools, p p any new development would need to go through the returned to use by the private sector will be addressed 5-5-5 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5.5 on a case-by-case basis to ensure all activities necessary to perpetuate the redevelopment initiative are advanced in a manner consistent with this Redevelopment Area Plan and any amendment to it. Such restrictions or controls would be expected in the form of covenants on any land sold or leased for private use as provided for in the Community Redevelopment Act, Section 163.380, F.S. To assure that redevelopment will take place in conformance with the projects, objectives and strategies expressed in this Redevelopment Area Plan, the Redevelopment Agency will utilize the regulatory mechanisms used by the County to permit development and redevelopment within its jurisdiction. These mechanisms include but are not limited to the Growth Management Plan;the Land Development Code; adopted design guidelines; performance standards; and County-authorized development review, permitting, and approval processes and any other adopted codes, standards, , and policies. 115 �4 I> r!g�� pa � au Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-5-6 5.5 9 A GENERAL REQUIREMENTS This page is intentionally left blank. 5-5-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 4. TAX INCREMENT at STU ESTIMATES !�{HtN� KlkkY u� 14 1 \.t ' l';':\, 444 ''t.4i4 .,4, II , , , ,,s, , . '',s'l c 4 '..r.....k .• if,; ' lks.,42.0 it,,,,,'',,,.t:,1 lt. , ,,t ,, v 7,. $„1,24:1; ,, .,2'4.. ''''' i 0 '0i i s ,t., , ..," , \., ' ,,,,, w . ,, .., ,e, .-....,"...N„4.. . * 4." AL s on w Ii� .i w• i� r . � °: ; '4:I III II I ift I I I i ii i fit I y I illiiiii 4'*'' w 5 . 6 , , ,„ , .,mow ' ;, . .e � ' .f. .: . 14« fiv 1 a w" 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 A ,,,,,,, , „�_, maximum revenue available to the 5.6.1 Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Trust Fund will be 95 percent of The Redevelopment Area is dependent upon the use the calculated increment revenues. fi of increment revenue financing for funding. Using this method, the County froze all taxable values within the Note that the first five years of projected values are Redevelopment Area at the 2000 rate to establish a obtained from Florida's Office of Economic& base collection amount. Millages are applied through Demographic Research (EDR) Revenue Estimating the General Fund (001) and the Unincorporated Area Conference. The conference produces detailed 4 General Fund (111).The future taxes collected projections of the "County Taxable Value" for each (associated with tax base and property value county in Florida. The values projected by EDR were increases) are placed into a separate account and used for each CRA tax increment scenario with the r designated for specific uses. The funds can be low, medium, high growth scenarios starting in 2025. dedicated to transportation or general improvements, For projection purposes past 2025, three different or placed in the general fund with the base ad valorem scenarios were developed that reflect different future revenues. growth rates for taxable values in the Redevelopment .ii Area. Additional details for each scenario are :, The analysis is based on the historical tax roll data Y presented below and in Tables 5-6-1 through 5-6-3. : obtained from the Florida Department of Revenue (FDOR) and population projections for Collier County Scenario #1 obtained from the Bureau of Economic and Business Ad valorem revenues associated with the increment Research (BEBR). Specific increases in the tax base are revenue financing for the Redevelopment Area were shown in terms of expected development and its estimated using the projected growth of the taxable value.This expected development is based exclusively values for residential and non-residential on past patterns of activity adjusted for anticipated developments. The average taxable values were community redevelopment activities within the indexed annually based on the positive correlation Redevelopment Area. These programmatic between population growth and taxable value assumptions offer a baseline for comparison with increases discussed previously, along with the future potential development. historical growth trends of taxable values in the ir ment Area, by land use. Based on these For this analysis, the Bayshore CRA's current millage Redevelopment ii rates have been used, and were held constant over projections, if the current millage is held constant the planning horizon. (3.5645 mils for fund 001 and 0.8069 mils for fund 111), the ad valorem taxes used for the j ' As for the structure of the revenues which may Redevelopment Area fund are estimated to generate accrue, only the taxable value(s) net of the base year approximately$33.8 million between through 2030. ii taxable value is considered in calculating current or future increment revenues. Additional growth scenarios are presented in this report that reflects more aggressive growth rates in i The general procedures used to calculate available taxable values and potential revenues. Although more revenues are shown in the following calculations: aggressive than the growth rates in Scenario#1, these • Assessed values, including new construction— scenarios still present revenue projections that can i Exemptions or exclusions= Current taxable values. reasonably be obtained. Since 1976, the taxable value Current taxable values—Established base ear for residential property in Collier County has averaged Y a 10 percent annual increase, and commercial taxable values= Net valuations subject to property has averaged a 9 percent annual increase. applicable jurisdictional millages. Within the CRA, taxable values(all property) have 4 • Net valuations x by applicable millages= averaged a 5 percent annual increase. increment revenues. Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Act, Section 163.387, F.S., the 5-6-1 \ Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 9 i TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6 Scenario #2 5 .2 unicipal Service Taxing Scenario#2 reflects increased growth rates that are consistent with the historical growth rates in taxable Units STUB) values for the entire CRA area.This scenario estimates There are two MSTUs that overlap with the CRA area — slightly higher taxable value growth than Scenario#1, the Bayshore Beautification MSTU and the Haldeman with a projected average annual taxable value growth Creek MSTU. The Bayshore Beautification MSTU was rate of 5.6 percent(as opposed to Scenario#1 at 5.2 created to provide certain streetscape and right-of-way percent). As CRA properties are redeveloped, it is improvements in the CRA area generally south of US reasonable to assume that taxable values will increase 41. The Haldeman Creek MSTU was created for at or above historical growth rates. Using these higher maintenance dredging and navigational marker annual growth rates, the Scenario#2 increment maintenance. Projected revenues for these two MSTUs revenue financing option would generate use a similar approach as described for the TIF approximately$34.3 million through 2030. calculations above. Note that revenues stem directly Scenario #3 from millages (as opposed to an increment difference with a base year as in the case of the TIF revenues). Additionally, an optimistic growth rate scenario was Additionally, the MSTU growth percentages are based developed. Scenario#3 has increased growth rates that on projected growth for the land use mix in the area, are more than Scenarios#1 and#2, bringing the resulting in different average annual taxable value average growth rate for all land uses more in line with growth rate percentages than those in the TIF the recent growth rates of the entire county seen over scenarios. The percentages used are: the last few years. This scenario projects the growth in taxable values for all property to average Bayshore: �'� approximately 6.0 percent, annually. Using these rates, • Low: 3.98% the increment revenue financing option generated approximately$35.1 million through 2030. • Medium:4.18% • For each of the following scenarios, the following High: 4.52% apply: Haldeman Creek: • Projected total taxable value of all properties • Low: 4.01% within Redevelopment Area. Projected growth • rates by land use are consistent with historical Medium:4.21% growth rates observed between 2000 and 2018 • High:4.55% within Redevelopment Area.All figures rounded to See Tables 5-6-4 through 5-6-6 for Bayshore nearest thousand. Beautification MSTU projected revenues and 5-6-7 • Difference between total taxable value (Item 1)for through 5-6-9 for Haldeman Creek MSTU projected each year and base year(2000). revenues. Note that the project planning in Section 5.4 • For projection purposes, millage rates are assumed showed revenues only through 2030 since this period to remain the same through 2030. had a given timeframe; the tables in this section show projected revenues out to 2048 to give a sense of f• , • Increment revenue by year(Item 2), divided by future revenues, although any long-term post-2030 1,000, multiplied by total millage rate, and reduced funding opportunities would need to be determined by 5 percent for budgeting purposes. based on actual project implementation timing. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-6-2 5.6 9 A TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES , , ,, „, , , , , ,, ,,, ,„, ,„,,,,,, ,,,,„„,,,_,„„,„,„,„„,,,„,„,,,,,„„,„,„„ ,,,:„,,,,,,,,..,:,..,,,,,,,,,,i:,,,,,,,,,,,L, taxable Value Tax Increment . .\,�`oA"�� ' .., �� ; �p �:r'��y��ftind 111 ,.Flii"I+i�001 ,. Fund 1 .�',��A�a� �`�`��„,,`�� 2018 $701,076,000 $412,995,000 - - - - - 2019 $742,976,000 $454,895,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,399,000 $317,000 $1,716,000 2020 $788,668,000 $500,587,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,540,000 $349,000 $1,889,000 2021 $835,148,000 $547,067,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,695,000 $384,000 $2,079,000 2022 $887,089,000 $599,008,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,853,000 $419,000 $2,272,000 2023 $940,889,000 $652,808,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,028,000 $459,000 $2,487,000 2024 $996,947,000 $708,866,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,211,000 $500,000 $2,711,000 2025 $1,047,610,000 $759,529,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,400,000 $543,000 $2,943,000 2026 $1,093,898,000 $805,817,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,572,000 $582,000 $3,154,000 2027 $1,139,554,000 $851,473,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,729,000 $618,000 $3,347,000 2028 $1,186,165,000 $898,084,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,883,000 $653,000 $3,536,000 2029 $1,233,732,000 $945,651,000 3.5645 0.8069 $3,041,000 $688,000 $3,729,000 2030 - - 3.5645 0.8069 $3,202,000 $725,000 $3,927,000 Total $27,553,000 $6,237,000 $33,790,000 Table 5-6-1:Scenario#1 Projected TIF Revenues Notes: 1. Source:Scenario#1 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 5.2%.Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic&Demographic Research(EDR)Revenue Estimating Conference.http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/ conferences/advalorem/index.cfm;rounded to thousands 2 Taxable value for each year(Item 1)less the base year taxable value of$288,081,106,rounded to thousands 3. For each fund,the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the millage,divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections(i e.,the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from 2017 to 2018);rounded to thousands eke 5-6-3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.f_ I�lillage Revenue131 Y'eer: Taxable Value Tax Incrementl2f \,. 2018 $701,076,000 $412,995,000 - - - - - 2019 $742,976,000 $454,895,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,399,000 $317,000 $1,716,000 2020 $788,668,000 $500,587,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,540,000 $349,000 $1,889,000 2021 $835,148,000 $547,067,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,695,000 $384,000 $2,079,000 2022 $887,089,000 $599,008,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,853,000 $419,000 $2,272,000 2023 $940,889,000 $652,808,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,028,000 $459,000 $2,487,000 2024 $996,947,000 $708,866,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,211,000 $500,000 $2,711,000 2025 $1,049,405,000 $761,324,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,400,000 $543,000 $2,943,000 2026 $1,104,810,000 $816,729,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,578,000 $584,000 $3,162,000 2027 $1,162,466,000 $874,385,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,766,000 $626,000 $3,392,000 2028 $1,221,578,000 $933,497,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,961,000 $670,000 $3,631,000 2029 $1,282,147,000 $994,066,000 3.5645 0.8069 $3,161,000 $716,000 $3,877,000 2030 - - 3.5645 0.8069 $3,366,000 $762,000 $4,128,000 Total $27,958,000 $6,329,000 $34,287,000 Table 5-6-2:Scenario#2 Projected TIF Revenues Notes: 1. Source:Scenario#2 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 5.6%.Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic&Demographic Research(EDR)Revenue Estimating Conference.http.//edr.state.fl.us/Content/ conferences/advalorem/index.cfm;rounded to thousands 2. Taxable value for each year(Item 1)less the base year taxable value of$288,081,106;rounded to thousands 3. For each fund,the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the millage,divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections(i.e.,the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from 2017 to 2018);rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-6-4 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 A i ', ;ti Revenue" Taxable Value"' Tax Increment �� \� F 1 „„„. 1t fund 0 1 Fund' 2018 $701,076,000 $412,995,000 - - - - - 2019 $742,976,000 $454,895,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,399,000 $317,000 $1,716,000 2020 $788,668,000 $500,587,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,540,000 $349,000 $1,889,000 2021 $835,148,000 $547,067,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,695,000 $384,000 $2,079,000 2022 $887,089,000 $599,008,000 3.5645 0.8069 $1,853,000 $419,000 $2,272,000 2023 $940,889,000 $652,808,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,028,000 $459,000 $2,487,000 2024 $996,947,000 $708,866,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,211,000 $500,000 $2,711,000 2025 $1,075,710,000 $787,629,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,400,000 $543,000 $2,943,000 2026 $1,138,185,000 $850,104,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,667,000 $604,000 $3,271,000 2027 $1,202,734,000 $914,653,000 3.5645 0.8069 $2,879,000 $652,000 $3,531,000 2028 $1,269,358,000 $981,277,000 3.5645 0.8069 $3,097,000 $701,000 $3,798,000 2029 $1,338,058,000 $1,049,977,000 3.5645 0.8069 $3,323,000 $752,000 $4,075,000 2030 - - 3.5645 0.8069 $3,556,000 $805,000 $4,361,000 Total $28,648,000 $6,485,000 $35,133,000 Table 5-6-3:Scenario#3 Projected TIF Revenues Notes: 1. Source:Scenario#3 projected taxable values for the Bayshore CRA. Average annual growth at 6.0%.Note that the first five years of projected values are obtained from Florida's Office of Economic&Demographic Research(EDR)Revenue Estimating Conference.http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/ conferences/advalorem/index.cfm;rounded to thousands 2. Taxable value for each year(Item 1)less the base year taxable value of$288,081,106;rounded to thousands 3. For each fund,the tax increment for the previous year multiplied by the millage,divided by 1,000 and reduced by 5%. Note that the revenues for each year are offset against the tax increment changes due to timing of collections(i.e.,the revenue for 2019 is based on the tax increment change from 2017 to 2018);rounded to thousands �� 5-6-5y Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 A5., Budgeting Projected Tax Year(FY) MSTU Valuation Millage Adjustment Revenue 2018 $556,396,000 - - - 2019 $591,115,000 95% 2.3604 $1,248,000 2020 $625,527,000 95% 2.3604 $1,326,000 2021 $660,035,000 95% 2.3604 $1,403,000 2022 $694,831,000 95% 2.3604 $1,480,000 2023 $730,024,000 95% 2.3604 $1,558,000 2024 $765,675,000 95% 2.3604 $1,637,000 2025 $801,820,000 95% 2.3604 $1,717,000 2026 $838,479,000 95% 2.3604 $1,798,000 2027 $875,663,000 95% 2.3604 $1,880,000 2028 $913,376,000 95% 2.3604 $1,964,000 2029 $951,615,000 95% 2.3604 $2,048,000 2030 $990,376,000 95% 2.3604 $2,134,000 2031 $1,029,652,000 95% 2.3604 $2,221,000 2032 $1,069,435,000 95% 2.3604 $2,309,000 2033 $1,109,713,000 95% 2.3604 $2,398,000 2034 $1,150,478,000 95% 2.3604 $2,488,000 2035 $1,191,719,000 95% 2.3604 $2,580,000 2036 $1,233,426,000 95% 2.3604 $2,672,000 2037 $1,275,588,000 95% 2.3604 $2,766,000 2038 $1,318,197,000 95% 2.3604 $2,860,000 2039 $1,361,244,000 95% 2.3604 $2,956,000 2040 $1,404,721,000 95% 2.3604 $3,052,000 2041 $1,448,622,000 95% 2.3604 $3,150,000 2042 $1,492,942,000 95% 2.3604 $3,248,000 2043 $1,537,676,000 95% 2.3604 $3,348,000 2044 $1,582,821,000 95% 2.3604 $3,448,000 2045 $1,628,376,000 95% 2.3604 $3,549,000 2046 $1,674,341,000 95% 2.3604 $3,651,000 2047 $1,720,719,000 95% 2.3604 $3,755,000 2048 - 95% 2.3604 $3,859,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $74,503,000 Table 5-6-4:Bayshore Beautification MSTU Scenario#1 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget,projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based(e.g.,millage applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048);rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-6-6 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES g A ,„ s,,,Budgeting Projected �� Tax Year (FY) MSTU Valuation Millage Adjustment Revenue 2018 $564,586,000 - - - 2019 $606,550,000 95% 2.3604 $1,266,000 2020 $647,829,000 95% 2.3604 $1,360,000 2021 $688,974,000 95% 2.3604 $1,453,000 2022 $730,243,000 95% 2.3604 $1,545,000 2023 $771,769,000 95% 2.3604 $1,637,000 2024 $813,623,000 95% 2.3604 $1,731,000 2025 $855,838,000 95% 2.3604 $1,824,000 2026 $898,424,000 95% 2.3604 $1,919,000 2027 $941,378,000 95% 2.3604 $2,015,000 2028 $984,686,000 95% 2.3604 $2,111,000 2029 $1,028,329,000 95% 2.3604 $2,208,000 2030 $1,072,280,000 95% 2.3604 $2,306,000 2031 $1,116,512,000 95% 2.3604 $2,404,000 2032 $1,160,995,000 95% 2.3604 $2,504,000 2033 $1,205,697,000 95% 2.3604 $2,603,000 2034 $1,250,586,000 95% 2.3604 $2,704,000 2035 $1,295,630,000 95% 2.3604 $2,804,000 2036 $1,340,798,000 95% 2.3604 $2,905,000 2037 $1,386,060,000 95% 2.3604 $3,007,000 2038 $1,431,386,000 95% 2.3604 $3,108,000 2039 $1,476,747,000 95% 2.3604 $3,210,000 2040 $1,522,118,000 95% 2.3604 $3,311,000 2041 $1,567,474,000 95% 2.3604 $3,413,000 2042 $1,612,792,000 95% 2.3604 $3,515,000 2043 $1,658,052,000 95% 2.3604 $3,616,000 2044 $1,703,235,000 95% 2.3604 $3,718,000 2045 $1,748,324,000 95% 2.3604 $3,819,000 2046 $1,793,307,000 95% 2.3604 $3,920,000 2047 $1,838,170,000 95% 2.3604 $4,021,000 2048 - 95% 2.3604 $4,122,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $80,079,000 Table 5-6-5:Bayshore Beautification MSTU Scenario#2 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget,projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based(e.g.,millage applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048);rounded to thousands 5-6-7 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 1 5.6 pISMITIF Budgeting Projecteell ,Tax Year (FY) MSTU Valuation Millage lliMavatiitvw Adjustment Revenue atat 2018 $570,658,000 - - - 2019 $618,846,000 95% 2.3604 $1,280,000 2020 $666,424,000 95% 2.3604 $1,388,000 2021 $714,014,000 95% 2.3604 $1,494,000 2022 $761,899,000 95% 2.3604 $1,601,000 2023 $810,218,000 95% 2.3604 $1,708,000 2024 $859,037,000 95% 2.3604 $1,817,000 2025 $908,378,000 95% 2.3604 $1,926,000 2026 $958,236,000 95% 2.3604 $2,037,000 2027 $1,008,590,000 95% 2.3604 $2,149,000 2028 $1,059,406,000 95% 2.3604 $2,262,000 2029 $1,110,643,000 95% 2.3604 $2,376,000 2030 $1,162,251,000 95% 2.3604 $2,490,000 2031 $1,214,180,000 95% 2.3604 $2,606,000 2032 $1,266,376,000 95% 2.3604 $2,723,000 2033 $1,318,783,000 95% 2.3604 $2,840,000 2034 $1,371,346,000 95% 2.3604 $2,957,000 2035 $1,424,009,000 95% 2.3604 $3,075,000 2036 $1,476,717,000 95% 2.3604 $3,193,000 2037 $1,529,417,000 95% 2.3604 $3,311,000 2038 $1,582,058,000 95% 2.3604 $3,430,000 2039 $1,634,591,000 95% 2.3604 $3,548,000 2040 $1,686,969,000 95% 2.3604 $3,665,000 2041 $1,739,148,000 95% 2.3604 $3,783,000 2042 $1,791,089,000 95% 2.3604 $3,900,000 2043 $1,842,753,000 95% 2.3604 $4,016,000 2044 $1,894,108,000 95% 2.3604 $4,132,000 2045 $1,945,121,000 95% 2.3604 $4,247,000 2046 $1,995,767,000 95% 2.3604 $4,362,000 2047 $2,046,022,000 95% 2.3604 $4,475,000 2048 - 95% 2.3604 $4,588,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $87,379,000 Table 5-6-6:Bayshore Beautification MSTU Scenario#3 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget;projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based(e.g.,millage applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048);rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-May 2019 5-6-8 5.6 9 A TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES .‘,.._ ,t,,, s'- Budgeting Projected Tax Year (FY) MSTU Valuation Millage Adjustment Revenue 2018 $114,144,000 - - - 2019 $121,368,000 95% 1.0000 $108,000 2020 $128,527,000 95% 1.0000 $115,000 2021 $135,705,000 95% 1.0000 $122,000 2022 $142,943,000 95% 1.0000 $129,000 2023 $150,263,000 95% 1.0000 $136,000 2024 $157,677,000 95% 1.0000 $143,000 2025 $165,193,000 95% 1.0000 $150,000 2026 $172,815,000 95% 1.0000 $157,000 2027 $180,545,000 95% 1.0000 $164,000 2028 $188,384,000 95% 1.0000 $172,000 2029 $196,330,000 95% 1.0000 $179,000 2030 $204,383,000 95% 1.0000 $187,000 2031 $212,541,000 95% 1.0000 $194,000 2032 $220,801,000 95% 1.0000 $202,000 2033 $229,163,000 95% 1.0000 $210,000 2034 $237,623,000 95% 1.0000 $218,000 2035 $246,178,000 95% 1.0000 $226,000 2036 $254,828,000 95% 1.0000 $234,000 2037 $263,569,000 95% 1.0000 $242,000 2038 $272,399,000 95% 1.0000 $250,000 2039 $281,317,000 95% 1.0000 $259,000 2040 $290,320,000 95% 1.0000 $267,000 2041 $299,407,000 95% 1.0000 $276,000 2042 $308,577,000 95% 1.0000 $284,000 2043 $317,829,000 95% 1.0000 $293,000 2044 $327,161,000 95% 1.0000 $302,000 2045 $336,574,000 95% 1.0000 $311,000 2046 $346,067,000 95% 1.0000 $320,000 2047 $355,641,000 95% 1.0000 $329,000 2048 - 95% 1.0000 $338,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $6,517,000 Table 5-6-7:Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario#1 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget;projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based(e.g.,millage applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048);rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-May 2019 9 A TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 5.6 r��` Budgeting Projected' `y Tax Year (FY) MSTU Valuation Millage Adjustment Revenue tw 2018 $115,836,000 - - - 2019 $124,558,000 95% 1.0000 $110,000 2020 $133,140,000 95% 1.0000 $118,000 2021 $141,695,000 95% 1.0000 $126,000 2022 $150,278,000 95% 1.0000 $135,000 2023 $158,915,000 95% 1.0000 $143,000 2024 $167,620,000 95% 1.0000 $151,000 2025 $176,401,000 95% 1.0000 $159,000 2026 $185,259,000 95% 1.0000 $168,000 2027 $194,193,000 95% 1.0000 $176,000 2028 $203,200,000 95% 1.0000 $184,000 2029 $212,276,000 95% 1.0000 $193,000 2030 $221,414,000 95% 1.0000 $202,000 2031 $230,610,000 95% 1.0000 $210,000 2032 $239,856,000 95% 1.0000 $219,000 2033 $249,146,000 95% 1.0000 $228,000 2034 $258,472,000 95% 1.0000 $237,000 2035 $267,828,000 95% 1.0000 $246,000 2036 $277,207,000 95% 1.0000 $254,000 2037 $286,603,000 95% 1.0000 $263,000 2038 $296,008,000 95% 1.0000 $272,000 2039 $305,418,000 95% 1.0000 $281,000 2040 $314,825,000 95% 1.0000 $290,000 2041 $324,226,000 95% 1.0000 $299,000 2042 $333,615,000 95% 1.0000 $308,000 2043 $342,987,000 95% 1.0000 $317,000 2044 $352,339,000 95% 1.0000 $326,000 2045 $361,667,000 95% 1.0000 $335,000 2046 $370,967,000 95% 1.0000 $344,000 2047 $380,238,000 95% 1.0000 $352,000 2048 - 95% 1.0000 $361,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $7,007,000 Table 5-6-8:Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario#2 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget;projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based(e.g.,millage applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048);rounded to thousands Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-May 2019 5-6-10 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 A „, ,,,.„ Budgeting Projected ` Tax Year (FY) MSTU Valuation Millage Adjustment Revenue 2018 $117,093,000 - - - 2019 $127,106,000 95% 1.0000 $111,000 2020 $136,995,000 95% 1.0000 $121,000 2021 $146,888,000 95% 1.0000 $130,000 2022 $156,844,000 95% 1.0000 $140,000 2023 $166,892,000 95% 1.0000 $149,000 2024 $177,044,000 95% 1.0000 $159,000 2025 $187,305,000 95% 1.0000 $168,000 2026 $197,673,000 95% 1.0000 $178,000 2027 $208,144,000 95% 1.0000 $188,000 2028 $218,710,000 95% 1.0000 $198,000 2029 $229,362,000 95% 1.0000 $208,000 2030 $240,089,000 95% 1.0000 $218,000 2031 $250,880,000 95% 1.0000 $228,000 2032 $261,724,000 95% 1.0000 $238,000 2033 $272,609,000 95% 1.0000 $249,000 2034 $283,523,000 95% 1.0000 $259,000 2035 $294,454,000 95% 1.0000 $269,000 2036 $305,390,000 95% 1.0000 $280,000 2037 $316,321,000 95% 1.0000 $290,000 2038 $327,234,000 95% 1.0000 $301,000 2039 $338,119,000 95% 1.0000 $311,000 2040 $348,967,000 95% 1.0000 $321,000 2041 $359,769,000 95% 1.0000 $332,000 2042 $370,514,000 95% 1.0000 $342,000 2043 $381,197,000 95% 1.0000 $352,000 2044 $391,809,000 95% 1.0000 $362,000 2045 $402,344,000 95% 1.0000 $372,000 2046 $412,795,000 95% 1.0000 $382,000 2047 $423,159,000 95% 1.0000 $392,000 2048 - 95% 1.0000 $402,000 Total - FY 2018-49: $7,650,000 Table 5-6-9:Haldeman Creek MSTU Scenario#3 Projected Revenues Notes:there is a 5%statutory reduction requirement for counties when projecting for budget projected revenue collected the year following the year on which the valuation is based(e.g.,millage applied to 2047 valuation collected in 2048);rounded to thousands 5-6-11 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan-May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES9A 5.6 5.6.3 Underlying Assumptions The following charts show underlying population and tax value trends that inform and contextualize the revenue projections calculations presented in this section. Figure 5-6-1 shows that the rate of population growth for Collier County has decreased sizably since 2002/2003, with a more gradual decrease projected out from 2017/2018 through 2030. f ' In terms of historic tax value growth rates since 2000, Figure 5-6-2 shows that there was an increase during the lead up to the recession, followed by a drop during the recession itself. In recent years, the rate has gradually risen. Given the sizable changes during the lead-up to the recession and the recession itself, the model used to generate TIF projections was matched to longer historical trends in County taxable values, from the 1970s through 2003/2004 historical taxable value for Collier County. Figure 5-6-3 shows the historical trend used for guidance in blue;this trend is continued for comparison to projection calculations (in this case, for the low revenue projections, shown by the grey line through 2030). The orange line indicates historic data that was excluded from the historic trend basis since it was considered an anomaly. Annual Population Growth Rate (2000-2030) 4.50% —Collier County 4 00% --State of Florida 3.50% ._._. p. 3.00% L......-.-.- -. .-...-.. - — 2.50% i 2.00% 7 1.50% ro' a 0.50% 0.00% 8 O O y O O O N m a �n � n oo m O N f V N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N i. �+ S Figure 5-6-1:Population Growth Rate Trends and Projections(2000-2030) Source:BEBR,Volume 51,Bulletin 180,January 2018 x yarn,�ryy Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-6-12 5.6 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 A 50,0% 40,0% it% 30.0% I 10,096 00 0.0% 44.age 40P 20(10 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2(X)/ 8 2009 2010 2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 201 41046 41IP 444-410 .0% -30.0% County 1axV64% CRA Tax Val% Figure 5-6-2:Trends in Tax Value Growth Rates(2000-2017) Source:Florida Property Valuations and Tax Databook&EDR Ad Valorem Revenue Estimating Conference ' • $180,000,000,000 y=60,174,402.16x2-447,131,682.73x+4,078,106,962.70 R2=0.95 $160,000,000,000 s„' $140,000,000,000 $120,000,000,000 `666; $100,000,000,000 ,• $80,000,000,000 $60,000,000,000 • • .• ..,""$40,000,000,000 $20,000,000,000 1976197819801982198419861988199019921994199619982000200220042006200820102012201420162018202020222024202620282030 Figure 5-6-3:Historic and Projected TIF Revenue Trend Comparison for Low Revenue Projection Source:Florida Property Valuations and Tax Databook&EDR Ad Valorem Revenue Estimating Conference 5-6-13 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 TAX INCREMENT & MSTU ESTIMATES 9 A 5.6 Conclusion With the recovery from the recession of 2008, the CRA area is poised for revitalization via investment, development, and redevelopment. With this update, the CRA will be able to continue the general mission of redevelopment that it set out when the Bayshore Gateway Triangle redevelopment area was first created in 2000. The CRA can move forward with the more detailed planning and evaluation for the suggested implementation items of this Redevelopment Area Plan with the guidance of the overall vision, allowing for change and also protecting and enhancing what defines the area and makes it unique. Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Area Plan—May 2019 5-6-14 9 .A Creativity in Bloom lindale Oliver design 9 A • Section 6 Relocation Procedures Relocation of residents and businesses displaced, as a result of property acquisition by the CRA will follow procedures, which fulfill the intent of the law and objectives stated below.• Collier County uses the Florida Department of Transportation relocation policy as a guideline which is based on the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Assistance Act of 1970 of the U.S. Federal Government. In those cases in which acquisition and relocation are to be utilized, the following general policy and guidelines shall apply unless the CRA chooses to adopt a separate relocation policy from time to time for a specific project. Displacement Policy and Guidelines: "Displacement" means the involuntary movement; except temporary relocation, of a household from a dwelling unit resulting from its acquisition, rehabilitation, or demolition, or a code enforcement activity. Relocation benefits will be received, on a uniform basis, by displaced families or persons following the guidelines of this policy. Activities which result in displacement action or in which.displacement may occur shall take into account options and effects to minimize displacement whenever possible. • Policy Applicability This policy and guidelines shall be used for redevelopment activities as a Local Displacement Policy, only when comprehensive treatment (an area which is effected by social, economical, and capital improvements as well as rehabilitation) in a target area is used. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Designated Target Areas: Relocation benefits are available to eligible households residing in dwelling ,units located in redevelopment target areas only when comprehensive treatment is used. • Occupancy Requirements Owner/Occupant: A person will be considered an owner/occupant if he/she actually owned and occupied the dwelling unit for not less than 180 consecutive days immediately prior to the Minimum Housing.Code Inspection of the dwelling unit. . • Tenant: A person will be considered a tenant if he/she lawfully occupied the rental dwelling for not less than 90 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing Code Inspection of the dwelling unit. Purchaser/Occupant: A person will be considered a purchaser-occupant if he/she occupied the dwelling unit for not less than 180 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing Code Inspection of the dwelling unit under a bona fide, written Agreement for Deed. • Business: The occupants, for not less than 90 consecutive days immediately prior to Minimum Housing Code inspection, of the dwelling in which the business is located. Written Notice: Determination of Displacement A person or business will be considered displaced as a result of redevelopment activities only if the displacement move occurs as a result of and after receipt of a written notice of eligibility for displacement • benefits. Adequate time will be provided to the displace to locate suitable temporary or permanent • housing. 102 • 9A • • Relation of Displacement Payments to Income and Assets - Displacement payments are not to be considered as income or for determining eligibility of a person or business under housing assistance programs. Displacement payments are not to be considered as assets for determining eligibility for H.U.D. or other public housing programs. Condition of the Replacement Dwelling as a Criterion for Payment When the replacement dwelling selected by the displace does not meet the local minimum housing coda, the Community Redevelopment Agency has a responsibility for providing continuing assistance to facilitate the claimant's move to a replacement dwelling that meets the local minimum housing code. BENEFITS AND ASSISTANCE Displacement Policy: Minimizing Impacts Relocation payments and assistance will be made bn a uniform basis to all those eligible without regard to race, color, religion, handicap, sex, age or source of income. Persons or businesses eligible for benefits and assistance are cautioned not to make any move before receiving approval from Collier County. This provision must be strictly adhered to inasmuch as unapproved moves,could result in denial of benefits and assistance. Benefits to be provided will be made as established in this relocation plan and all payments made under this policy shall be deemed appropriate by Collier County. Project or program activities shall be planned and carried out in a manner that minimizes hardship to site occupants. Persons or businesses to be displaced shall be afforded the opportunity of participating in the formulation of relocation plans and shall be provided full information relating to program or project activities which may have an impact on the residents and businesses of the project or program area. Arrangements shall be made to provide relocation assistance in accordance with the needs of those to be displaced, including social services counseling, guidance assistance, and referrals, as well as housing counseling. Relocation shall be carried out in a manner that will promote maximum choice within the community's total housing supply; lessen racial, ethnic, and economic concentrations; and facilitate desegregation and racially inclusive patterns of occupancy and use of public and private facilities. Services to Minimize Displacement Impacts: Services shall be provided to ail persons and businesses being displaced to assure that the relocation process will not result in different or separate treatment on account of race, color, religion, sex, age, or source of income. Eligible persons and businesses shall be fully informed at the earliest possible date as to the availability of relocation payments and assistance, and tile eligibility requirements, as well as the procedures for obtaining such payments and assistance. Direct personal interviews will be utilized to determine the extent of the need of each eligible person and business for relocation assistance. Displacement Housing Benefits: Redevelopment Condemnation/Demolition, and Rehabilitation A family person or business displaced under this Section is eligible for a displacement benefit for a comparable replacement dwelling as determined by family composition or business. Owner/occupants_who elect to purchase a replacement dwelling are eligible for a maxim i m payment of $15,000.00. 103 9A ' Tenants are eligible for a displacement housing payment of up to $4,000.00 rental assistance, or down payment assistance. Owner/occupants who do not elect to purchase another housing unit are eligible for a replacement housing payment equivalent to four years rental assistance, but not to exceed $4,000.00. Computation of rental assistance payments shall be based on the current Fair Market Rents. Moving Expense and Dislocation Allowance Families and persons permanently vacating their dwelling because of Condemnation/Demolition or Rehabilitation activities are eligible for a one time moving expense allowance of up to $500.00 to help • defray costs involved in displacement. • Businesses: The occupant of the dwelling is eligible for a moving payment of up to $10,000.00 to relocate the business to a decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling. Finality of Payment The total approved amount of a relocation payment is not subject to later computation except to correct an error or to implement findings on review in accordance with established procedures. Temporary Displacement Benefits Temporary Displacement Benefits, when authorized, shall be fully documented and approved by the Administrator of Community Development and Environmental Services. Temporary benefits shall discontinue upon issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. . Approved costs in connection with a temporary displacement include: 1. Actual reasonable moving cost to and from temporary accommodations which must be located within Collier County. These costs can be one of the following: • a) Actual invoice cost of a certified moving contractor. b) A $300.00 total allowance if a self-move. c)• A $100.00 total allowance if displacement does not involve household furnishings. 2. Actual reasonable cost of renting or sharing a temporary dwelling excluding deposits and installation charges. Temporary housing accommodations can be one of the following depending upon the composition of the displaced household and available accommodations: a) A dwelling reserved,exclusively for temporary relocation housing. b) Other adequate housing. • c) A motel, only when displacement is less than 15 days. • 3. Actual reasonable costs for storage of furniture that cannot be housed in the temporary unit, not to exceed the benefit period for temporary housing. • 4. Businesses are not eligible for temporary displacement benefits. In all cases, the temporary displacement dwelling must be inspected and approved by the Community Redevelopment Agency as decent, safe, and sanitary. DOCUMENTATION, ASSURANCES, AND SERVICES • • 104 1 9 A •Displacement Plan Implementation The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency is the assigned administrative implementing agency for displacemerit and shall use the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Handbook 1371.1, Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition, for assistance and guidance in implementing this policy. • Equal Opportunity .In carrying out displacement actions, the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency shall take ' affirmative actions to provide displaced families, individuals and businesses maximum opportunities in selecting replacement dwellings within the community's total housing supply. Affirmative Action shall take place to lessen racial, ethnic, and economic concentrations; and facilitate desegregation and racially inclusive patterns of occupancy and use of public and private facilities. • Notification of Availability of Payments As soon as it is ascertained that a family or business displacement is imminent, the Community Redevelopment Agency shall provide them with written notification of the specific types of relocation payments for which the displace is apparently eligible and the estimation of the benefits that may,be received. • Housing Referrals Current and continuing information wipe provided on the availability, prices of comparable sales and rental dwellings. Assurances will be provided that, within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, there will be available comparable decent, safe, and sanitary replacement dwellings meeting the Collier County Minimum Housing Standards, equal in number and available to eligible persons and businesses who will be displaced. Supportive Services Necessary advisory services will be provided to eligible persons and businesses, such as counseling and referrals with regard to housing, financing, employment, training, health, welfare and other assistance in order to minimize any hardships incurred. Each eligible person shall be assisted in completing any required applications and forms. RELOCATION PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS Case File Records: Case file records shall be maintained for each displaced person! family or business. Record keeping standards shall follow the HUD Relocation Handbook as guidance. • • • • 105 • 9 A • • Management Control System: • A Management Control System shall be established to identify the size and composition of the displacement/relocation workload. Management Control Standards shall follow the HUD Relocation Handbook as guidance. • Opinions of the County Attorney Opinions of the County Attorney concerning legality of actions or procedures shall.be sought and incorporated'as required. Notices and Correspondence Notices to affected parties and decisions shall be in writing or a part of a written case file record. Written records shall be kept in accordance with Collier County policy. Procedural Guidance and Standards HUD Handbook 1376.1, Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition shall be used as guidance for procedures and standards for displacement activities. • APPEALS PROCEDURE A formal appeal procedure has been established and maintained for use by displaced persons and businesses seeking administrative review of agency determinations in connection with displacement payments and/or adequacy of replacement housing. Appeals'of-this Displacement Policy must be presented in writing. The Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel consisting of the Administrator of the Community Development and Environmental Services Division and one resident property owner of affected area appointed by the County Manger is assigned the administration of appeals of the Local Displacement Policy. Timing for Initiating Appeal An appeal concerning eligibility for, or the amount of, a displacement benefit shall be filed within six months after the Community Redevelopment Agency's notification to the person of its determination of a displacement case. An appeal alleging failure to provide appropriate housing referrals or to properly inspect the replacement dwelling shall be filed not later than six months after the person's displacement. ' Appeal The appeal may include any related statement of fact or other material. Assistance to Person Making Appeal If a person or business is unable to prepare a written appeal, the Community Redevelopment Agency shall offer them appropriate assistance and notify them of other available sources of assistance. • Scope of Review of Written Appeal: The Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel shall consider a person's or business' written appeal, regardless of form. In deciding the appeal, the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel shall consider: . 1) All applicable rules and regulations;. . 2) All pertinent justification and written material submitted by the person making the appeal; and • 3) All material upon which the Community Redevelopment Agency based the determination(s) being • appealed and any other available information that is needed to insure a fair and full review of the appeal. • .106 • • • 9 A • However, the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel must ensure that the person making the appeal has had reasonable opportunity to review any such materials and information on which an adverse ruling on the appeal may be based. . . Request for Additional Time If a person or business makes a request for additional time to gather and prepare information for a written appeal, the person or business must be granted 30 days additional time, in addition to the time limits established by this policy. This request must be documented by the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel. Determination and Notification after Written Appeal • Within 30 days after receipt of information submitted by a person or business in support of their appeal, the Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel shall make written determination on the appeal and furnish the person with a copy. The written determination shall include, but need not be limited to: • 1) The Community Redevelopment Appeals Panel's decision upon review of the appeal; ?_) The factual and legal basis upon which the decision is based, including any pertinent explanation; 3) If any payment or other relief to the person or business is granted, a brief statement on how this will be provided; 4) If the relief requested is not granted, a statement of the person or business right to appeal to the County Commission within 30 days. • • • • • • • 107 9A APPENDIX A 9 A 1. 2 c RESOLUTION NO.2000- 82 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; MAKING FINDINGS; FINDING BLIGHTED AREAS EXIST IN THE COUNTY; FINDING THE REHABILITATION, CONSERVATION OR REDEVELOPMENT OF SUCH AREAS IS NECESSARY IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST; FINDING A SPECIFIED AREA TO BE A BLIGHTED AREA AND A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT WITH OTHER RESOLUTIONS AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has received and considered a report and presentation by County staff and consultant which identified conditions within the boundaries of Collier County In the areas identified,described and depicted on Exhibit"A' attached hereto and made a part of this resolution (the "Area"); and WHEREAS,after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions In the Area and has received and considered such other evidence of the conditions in the Area as have been presented to it, the Board of County Commissioners desires to proceed in accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part ill. Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can be accomplished In the Area and that certain actions are appropriate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present in the Area; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings, The Board of County Commissioners does hereby find: (a) Based upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Board of County Commissioners,the following conditions exist In the Area: 1. Conditions are present in the Area that are detrimental to the sound growth of the county and which substantially Impair or arrest the growth within the 9 A 12 c 1 Area, and present conditions and uses In the Area are detrimental to the public health, safety,morals and public welfare;and 2. There is a predominance of inadequate or defective street layout; and 3. There is faulty and Inadequate lot layout in relation to size, adequacy,accessibility,or usefulness;and 4, There are unsanitary conditions as such relates to the conditions of the sanitary system and there are unpaved and deteriorating roadways resulting in unsafe public conditions;and 5. There has been a deterioration of site and other Improvements; and 6. There is a diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title,which prevent the free alienability of land. (b) The notices required by Section 163.346, Florida Statutes (1999), have been timely published or mailed In accordance with said statute. (c) Action must be taken Immediately to prevent further blight and deterioration and to protect and enhance public expenditures previously made in the Area. Section 2. Finding of Necessity, The Board of County Commissioners, based upon evidence presented to it and in the public record, does hereby find that one or more'blighted areas" (as defined in Section 163.340(8), Florida Statutes), exist within Collier County, Florida, and, further finds that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area or areas described Is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida. Section 3, Community Redevelopment Area. Based upon the facts presented to it and contained in the public record, the Board of County Commissioners does hereby find the Area (as herelnbefore defined) is a "blighted area" (as that term is defined In Section 163.340(8), Florida Statutes(1999), and that such area constitutes a 9 A 12 c 1 "community redevelopment area" as defined In Section 163.340(10), Florida Statutes (1999). Section 4. Conflicts. All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with any of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed, provided, however, nothing herein is Intended nor should be applied to affect, repeal, alter, amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a"blighted area"for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act. Section 5. $everabllity. If any section or portion of a section of this resolution, Including any part of the exhibit, proves to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, It shall not be held to invalidate or Impair the validity,force, or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Should either area constituting part of the Area or part thereof shall be severed from the Area and the remainder shall constitute the Area for purposes of this resolultion. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon Its passage and adoption. Section 7. I This Resolution adopted after motion,second and majority vote this /L 4day of ,2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DW!GHT 6.BROCK,CLERK COLLIER ORIDA • • 4 % ,.b'e • BY: +'„ TIMOT .CONSTA E, C R At test as to Cha man s • sfp tur:•cit]y. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY David C.Weigel County Attorney 9 A 1 � c 1 EXHIBIT A BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTION BEG SW CNR SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, N 630', E 662', S 427', E 200', N 270', E TO THE E R/W LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE, S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10, SUNSET SUB, E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6, SUNSET SUB, S 92', E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55, BLK A, ROCK CREEK PARK, N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10, BLK B, ROCK CREEK PARK, E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12, TWP 50, RNG 25, E 670', S 773', W 200', S 735', W 200', S 990', E 460', S 330', E 972', S 1174', SWLY 481', NWLY 523', W 95', SWLY 730'TO THE NELY RIW LINE U.S.41, CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY R/W LINE U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAW LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W RAN LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N R/W LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761', N 1355', W TO THE W R/W LINE OF PINE STREET, N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2, BLK K, INOMAH SUB,W 100', N TO THE N RAW OF WASHINGTON AVE, CONT NWLY AND WLY ALG NLY RAW LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2, BLK C, INOMAH SUB, W TO THE W RAN LINE OF FREDRICK ST, N TO NE CNR LOT 9, COC-LEE-TERRACE SUB, W TO THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 11, TWP 50, RNG 25, N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. AND BEG SE CNR SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, N ALG THE E SECT LINES OF SECT 23 AND 14, TWP 50, RNG 25, TO E '/.CNR SECT14, TWP 50, RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR LOT 6, CREWS SUB, N TO THE S LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, E TO THE SWLY R/W LINE OF U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W R/W LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N R/W LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761', N 1355', W TO THE W RAW LINE OF PINE STREET, S TO THE S RAN LINE OF MANGROVE STREET,W TO THE NW CNR LOT 14, BLK F, HALDEMAN RIVER SUB, S TO THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, SWLY ALG THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14, TWP 50, RNG 25, S ALG THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14 AND 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, TO THE SW CNR OF SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR OF SECT 23, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. 9 A BA YSI iE / GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELMENT AFT, r. 1 - mC:/NI1lltiff'c nln //.11M v I 1 IWao som •L1:■p�+ .. _ f#�! : h;r 1 ••:1. � �Z� .^_ ring I�1 11101 1-,1■ zultil gimp-- /- ig_` I ►\_ .. %i 4��V Inll-�A/ _- _pull a gmlllll=^I ..'��..1 ' �/f .I, ulytnn,lnhln�it.n.. I/.Iru,l..,IL u 1 n lingait�l mug. p erri = mg amn- 1I �_ ■■li■ill _ :■rrner:Ilaa:ll,nmfllrlNlllKr •'{ _ — -__ `--� / f'{rllllllllinw• 1 ':10m ■ I _ - �..w, �luu mw wnlrr.llr • -•••- j-•••-� �- / i I°Ilnllll� ■1N 11K■11•IIfu 1 1 /1-♦ • •.�11111111':IWIInM�iiiir: 1)11K1 + -� ...AWOL y, �tr..n..l;z ru /fnr•nl_—Iruunn„u JI .� w•.U ur.a. �... � 1� Clm,luuuuuul= rrqq .N.. :•• _ '1ffit NGil=,oky .\— .1an; NMN.NM1 -9l �Iil= 111Er (/ lu.11_w•a, is 1g • t Mq' Ft. . -�=Mll.♦4 •.,�iJ MIMN�fo Li sI nlwll w• ��.��w `^ .l f I�tM?1.,.,', IIONM ill_ �:y�r, �Li�%ii��p.i pn1111 111111�C AI:IyM ` i=.�'r� 1 �.� - -1P;tr:, - ,..,,,-,...„,L„ 1 Pr .931 VIM Illf GIi M� ��I�. �� it? '••ed■! r— u = is. tilitz. I1rMIIII••111.11111111M ■:D °-•�/' ''� (�►�� -�l�,l#M1MIIt1111M11•WNi App I ;ail tit:.;:i:if; , =r�' �y 41 � �� . I, . Ifip ustaieto t.' !!=i 1`,, ' W ) i riiii il- .i.i\�N'llli. i Kt # dloillk ■�� PnliPi i Jl: niuq Estnc:011g y1? 1.1 n.Ir:, .��/}Se" ,,..R[♦♦ 'i� 1 "lflflS•,.lugl'r _nll:'lli7 c �i _1��:�� ♦ i 'a unl,u.,; 51114::IIIIy-- ,j�_,1 q^--_► s 1 i `;_ ��` -L01 w rItll':1111111111111t11� t�`V''' �1� r�►;iQ• nNlulrauunm= _minuunmltol t� (f P[ rls.114iii IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIB � 1111i10i1 \ ,Q III,IInIlI11111111111= `.•• ` I'`3,$) Illllli f.1111111111= _IIIIIIIIIi111111111111 '»'�'t�'� �,�r�, -' 11111{11111111NIIn111L L\ 11111111I1111111iI111: (.n wa \, 111111WIIIIIl1111I111: '��:17::uuri::..;iw..,igilifilmm lt,_ -- -*ix ;►• •.,•\,� �1� III111T1111t11.1111� = � �"J,11: -- iiltlmi,h:1 ilim►.. �_ - I _ u =t-. l 1==1 frftiftI1. -� �, Oluuu/u111 1 at111IN►��y`\:, '+ �1111..r_ _:-,mIIIi,1111111111mIU •1111 NI1M/w��'\, A ,'111111•• ;-^� n I a•1MIIIIIIIIMI. `'`I, slam, I IQ,7 /e^a Irmo anew�' N 1 #MIIMI/t j 1 ' III=S 11'Y,UII.INI\ % \<.� , ;p.m. I '- ?_�..w;l{h7__��= .wn.a♦* •♦. (� K till rr•yll'111q--S� - r . ■-=111ai11Mt \\��;.i :•IMIIIIHM11M11IIM -- )S ,nu�� 1_Sunnuilllnumal 1 1 P� -I -1 11 u�til�h !1// �I• :uwmiltllnlnu i I 1Immn2un�n �iut - II 1111111111 I, "• ,'IIII11111111N11111111► .-111 Illlllllflllllllll• tf•1 NIIIII f 111 /:111111111111111111th mu LL1111n1111t1111mn11n11111U it1 1l �11`anuunlllHlllll?WO USN LiONIID \ 0._.,—_. �\ t___ t, 1 ji 9 A 12 C ° 1 IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREADESCRIPTION BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25,TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE E ALG N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30, TWP 46 RNG 29, THENCE E ALG THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30, 29, 28, 27,AND 26 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S ALG THE W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW '/4 OF SW Y4 SEC 25, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SW '/4 OF SW '/4 SEC 25, THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W% OF NW %OF SEC 36, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF THE W Y2 OF NW '/. SEC 36, THENCE W TO THE W Y4 CRN SECTON 36, THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 36 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 30, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE W TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W TO THE S '/4 CNR SEC 1 AND THE N 1/4 CNR OF SEC 12, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE S %CNR SEC 12 AND THE N % CNR OF SEC 13, TWP 47, RNG 29,THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THE W 1/4 CNR SEC 13 AND THEE '/4 CNR OF SEC 14,TWP 47, RNG 29, CONT W TO THE W Y4 CNR OF SEC 14 AND THE E '/ CNR OF SEC 15, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15,THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 16 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 16, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE N ALG THE W LINE OF SEC 16 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9, TWP 47, RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 5, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6,TWP 47, RNG 29, AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE E '/. CNR OF SEC 1, THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD, THENCE ALG THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY, NLY, NWLY, WLY, SWLY TO THE INTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 35, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B. 9 A T 47 5 I i T 46 5 1 2 C 1 , .f __ f 7 ! D O ni C-----......,., 36111C'. i-T— n.: 1-' ;g M C 1fpi e I f i �S :l N.) r m la ,E =i 0..,• m ....or—_ Hsi_ S.R. 28 1 in =�� ' ' c •■ino ��S'i" co % Q p C.R. 046 M _ ' -4.!- =b N : O m ' ' , n u, ,9111111 Ill I.� e z / -- ).ti a - / .@,-, \ . 23 /....4 ., .., / -0 kIi 3 "Nel 1 lip-----. •s •tip b it (A IV // 11 t... Xi CO I I W W O j I i T 47 5 1 T•46 5 I 9 A Collier County FINDINGS OF NECESSITY AND BLIGHTED CONDITIONS Y tvi et., [1 ' Kati �.�{r C _ : „ • l _ _ : •R, .-. • •raw .' I •.i ~ tea•—.‹,,�i. r , BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA cci /( 9 A Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION Page 1 II. STATUTORY DEFINITION Page 1 III. BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE FINDINGS OF CONDITIONS Page 2 IV. IMMOKALEE FINDINGS OF CONDITIONS Page 8 MAPS Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area Page 7 Immokalee Redevelopment Area Page 13 • • /02(c) / 9 A I. INTRODUCTION The first step in creating a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) is a "Finding of Necessity" or a finding that one or more geographic areas in a municipality has conditions of"slum or blight", and that there is a need to rehabilitate, conserve and redevelop that area. Accomplished by Resolution of the governing body, this finding means that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment or combination thereof is necessary. On January 11, 2000 the Board of County Commissions directed staff to prepare a Finding of Necessity for two areas with in Collier County: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle and Immokalee. This report details the Findings of Necessity"for the above referenced areas. II. STATUTORY DEFINITION OF SLUM AND BLIGHT IN CHAPTER 163.340 Chapter 163.340 of the Florida Statute defines slum and blight as the following: "Slum Area" means an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, which by reason of dilapidation, deterioration, age, or obsolescence; inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces; high density of population and overcrowding; the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes; or any combination of such factors is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, or crime and Is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. "Blighted Area" means either: (a) An area in which there a substantial number of slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions; 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land; and 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities; or roadways, bridges, or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The following sections detail the findings of blighted conditions in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle and the Immokalee areas that justify making a finding of Necessity for blighted conditions as outlined in Chapter 163, Florida Statute: Coal /` 9 A III. BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA FINDINGS QF BLIGHT CONDITIONS )alighted Area [as defined in Section 163.340 j0L Florida Statutes) means either: (a) An area in which there are a substantial number of slum, deteriorated or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use: 1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; The Bayshore/Gateway Redevelopment Area is characterized by a defective or Inadequate street layout. These problems include: Inadequate street layout and design; Commercial parking problems; Lack of streetlights along major arterial and most local streets; Lack of sidewalks; and Lack of neighborhood connections. In the Bayshore/Gateway Redevelopment area there are three major collectors, Bayshore Road and Thomasson Drive and Shadowlawn Drive. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum of 100 feet of right of way for collectors. Shadowlawn Drive bisects a residential community with an elementary school and several churches. It is located in the Gateway Triangle area and is a two- lane collector with 11 foot wide lanes. The right-of-way width of Shadowlawn Drive varies from 55 to 70 feet. Shadowlawn Drive does not have sidewalks or bike lanes and does not meet the 100' minimum right-of-way standard. Thomasson Drive is a two-lane facility. The roadway width is twenty feet which does not meet the County's standard of a twenty-two foot minimum width for collector roads. There are no sidewalks along Bayshore Road from Thomasson Road south to its terminous. The commercial areas are located on Davis Boulevard (SR 84), Airport Road, Bayshore Road and US 41. Davis Boulevard, Airport Road and US 41 are the area's major arterials. All are characterized by inadequate off-street parking and no available on-street parking. Along these early-established commercial corridors many businesses were constructed prior to the establishment of development standards for parking. The parking problem has worsened along Davis Boulevard and US 41 due to roadway widening from four to six lane facilities. On-street parking is no longer available on Davis Boulevard and some of the parking area along US 41 was acquired for the recent road widening of that facility. In some cases, parking lots are oriented in such a way that vehicles must back out into traffic. Most of the commercial areas are not linked to one another so there are no shared parking opportunities. ,2CCJ 2 /4/ 9 A Davis Boulevard has no streetlights creating a compromised nighttime travel condition. There is very little nighttime pedestrian activity and some businesses have taken measures to secure their properties with bars on windows and chain link fences along the perimeter of their properties. The residential neighborhoods are not linked to one another. The typical local street width is 18 feet in the area. The County standard for local roads is 20 feet. There is no street lighting or sidewalks on most local streets. 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness: The majority of land zoned for commercial development within this area is zoned General Commercial (C-4) and Heavy Commercial (C-5). Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet with a minimum width of 100 feet. Most of the commercial lots in the area do not meet the minimum size of width required for commercial development. The lots accessed off of US41and Davis Boulevard have been reduced in size as a result of road widening projects of these two arterials. The C-4 and C-5 zoning district requires a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet, a side yard setback of 15 feet; and a 15 feet rear yard set back. The majority of buildings are located on or near the lot line, with no buffer. In addition, the entire commercial lots located between Pine Street and US41 were platted years ago when minimum standards were not applied and do not conform to most of today's standards. The majority of the land zoned for residential development in the Gateway Triangle area is zoned Residential Multiple Family—6 district (RMF-6). The area consists of 359 acres of which 125 acres are zoned residential. There are 402 residential dwelling units within this area. The actual residential density Is far below the approved density for the area, with 1 unit per 3 aces developed instead of the 6 units per acre allowed. The average age of the housing stock is 45- 55 years old. The RMF-6 zoning district has a minimum requirement of 6500 square feet with a width of 60 feet for a single family development; 12,000 square feet with a width of 80 feet for a two-family development; and 5,500 square feet per unit with a width of 100 feet for a three or more family residential development. Most of the residential properties in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for residential development. Some do not meet either of the width or lot square footage requirements. Some of the buildings are non-conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, and setbacks. In the Bayshore neighborhood there is a mixture of residential zoning. The majority is RMF-6 and Residential Single Family-4 district (RSF-4). There are also Mobile Home (MH) and Village Residential district (VR) zoning within the area. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet with a width of 70 feet for interior lots and 75 feet for corner lots for residential development in the RSF4 zoning district. The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a width of 60 feet for residential development in the VR and MH zoning districts. 3 75 9 A Most of the residential lots in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for residential development. On average the lots in these areas are forty to fifty feet wide. Most of the buildings are non-conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, and setbacks. 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions: According to 1990 Census Data, 0.10 percent of Bayshore/Gateway Triangle area households lack complete plumbing for exclusive use. In the entire county, this figure is 0.02 percent. In occupied housing units across the county for 1990, only 0.03 percent of the units had more than 1.51 or more persons per room. This figure for the Bayshore/Gateway area is 3.0 percent, reflecting a greater degree of overcrowding in the area (1990 Census). In the Bayshore/Gateway study area, 2 unsafe structures identified from January 1998 to February 2000. Sidewalks and streetlights are almost absent from local streets within the redevelopment area. 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements: Most of the local roads are poorly drained. Properties and roads are frequently flooded. CD Surface water management problems are present within the entire Bayshore/Gateway study area. These problems include localized flooding and direct discharge of stormwater run-off into Naples Bay. Significant and frequent flooding throughout the Gateway area is attributed to low elevations and inadequate stormwater management systems. Bayshore experiences the same problems. The entire Bayshore area, east of Bayshore Road , south of Haldemann Creek experiences the same significant and frequent flooding. South of Thomasson Drive, many of the local roads are unpaved and are poorly drained. 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land: For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area. For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities or roadways, bridges or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The residential neighborhoods lack connection to one another. The current right of way along Shadowlawn Drive is inadequate to provide needed improvements and acquisition of additional right of way would negatively impact the community. /1.@J 4 /6 9 ,A The commercial lots lack adequate parking facilities. There is no public transportation provided within the study area. The local streets do not meet the County standards of right—of- way width, pavement width, or placement of sidewalks. Housing Affordability [as defined in Section 163.355 (8) F.S.) means: An area in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly. There is a great demand in the County for affordable housing. According to the Florida Association of Realtors, the Naples MSA is the least affordable community in the State. In 1996, the median sales price for a single family home in the MSA was $180,000. In addition, only 31% of all dwelling units sold in 1995 were under $99,000. While there are opportunities for obtaining affordable housing in the Bayshore/Gateway Traingle Redevelopment Area, the average 1999 sales price for a single family home was $108,267. The current trends predict that acquisition and rental prices will continue to rise. According to Kiplinger's Personal Finance it is projected that within the next ten years home values in Naples are expected to grow by 75.1 percent. CONCLUSION OF FINDINGS OF BLIGHT It is the conclusion of this study that the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle study area clearly has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout, unsafe or unsanitary conditions, and deterioration of a site or other improvements as set forth in Chapter 163 for �-- designation as a blighted area and that rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of the Bayshore/Gateway study area is necessary and advisable in the furtherance of the public interest of residents of Collier County. /0/(c) ( 5 /7 9 A BAYSHOREIGATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEG SW CNR SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, N 630', E 662', S 427', E 200', N 270', E TO THE E RAN LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE, S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10, SUNSET SUB, E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6, SUNSET SUB, S 92', E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55, BLK A, ROCK CREEK PARK, N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10, BLK B, ROCK CREEK PARK, E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25, S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12, TWP 50, RNG 25, E 670', S 773', W 200', S 735', W 200', S 990', E 460', S 330', E 972', S 1174', SWLY 481', NWLY 523', W 95', SWLY 730' TO THE NELY RAN LINE U.S. 41, CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY RNV LINE U.S. 41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U.S. 41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W RIW LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N RAN LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761', N 1355', W TO THE W RAN LINE OF PINE STREET, N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2, BLK K, INOMAH SUB, W 100', N TO THE N RAN OF WASHINGTON AVE, CONT NWLY AND WLY ALG NLY RAN LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2, BLK C, INOMAH SUB, W TO THE W RAN LINE OF FREDRICK ST, N TO NE CNR LOT 9, COC-LEE-TERRACE SUB, W TO THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 11, TWP 50, RNG 25, N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2, TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE POB. AND 50, BEG SE CNR SECT 23. TWP RNG 25, N ALG THE E SECT LINES OF SECT 23 AND 14, TWP 5Q. RNG 25. TO E % CNR SECT14. TWP 50. RNG 2 E T TO THE SE CNR LOT 6. CREWS SUB N TO THE S LI OF HALDEMAN CREEK E TO THE SWLY R/W LINE OF U S 41 NWLY \ ALG THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U_S. 41 TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W RAN LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVES TO THE N RIW LINE OF WEEKS AVE, W 761', N 1355', W TO THEW • R/W LINE OF PINE STREET. S TO THE S RNV LINE OF MANGROVE STREET, W TO THE NW CNR LOT 14, BLK F. HALDEMAN RIVER SUB, S TO THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK. SWLY ALG THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14. TWP 50, RNG 25. S ALG THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14 AND 23. TWP 50, RNG 25, TO THE SW CNR OF SECT 23. TWP 50. RNG 25. E TO THE SE CNR OF SECT 23, TWP 50, / CC) 6 0 /O 9 A BAYSHORE / GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOMENT AREA • • _ , . ---,- :4:),,,!' .7-. --,-4-•-•-•'='.-_-‘--F-.. - - ----z-_a: ,.----1'm m......_...„,..4., .,,, . ..''• •'' __,..r z.,-....:,.......- ___,_.....-..... ' ,',._itb,_.... ... .. -.,.._.-,..:-. ,_. _____...... _ ...,...._______. .. __ '-• -- Z•?:-.:,.. ..:71 .. •"--- - ...._..,..0. ---— — ,_' =-..- 1 s. -',..• "- . ..: -a . ..„, - I' ,'..OH'=r-a• • I-.—,k!...,7.L- II - -4—,.. ,-:-----; . =nimilf11411111,111, ;.7., , ' _. _ .7-. i. ". I, it, •,,• • —_. "---"-airalarc. ^...'.0.-^- ••.._ _ '''.. s''. '' ' . . . 1.11,:ltit, •-- , 11\ N.)s, ..„ • i --•,1 •' . , • - . . . •-• ,. ,_...,.. „1, ''' ,. .-------- .. •',•••• ' .21 ,...,,,,, . / . ,,• ,, .....__A .___. . --,-,... ....__ .....„... . ______4.. : *1141:,-:_.— .P..',,,. • .7.-: :! -- , •-•fit •— ,.... , .. :,,...1,47..., ,___. ,.... • _ ,. , :' " :'.,ill!, = . •.,:s."-i...ii•.1-\:,,•••, 1,. • 1;,..,,.." -......-......Cs,........:,::..-- -,..:z.':7--+.7...:.....z f... --.----1-%.1,-.' Air-I if.'Prig 04.>-.4."' LA • / .-56-, =6"-IN tAl.N4:•••• ' .---11. I ' ,It'''•••-•; VI i li ; ' —• i .. 4., .: -iiierii:.-%,,,i4.1,4^ ",....... . .,• niar.r 1,,i,, .,..„ g i-, • •-•"-' / -----': ' , tiii7rWt s i" a-L•t-t-4- 'ION: • , .!.s."- • j• . 1 01_ 5 '''' 1.c.‹...-..? ; -.:.I. RIZ.H. --:—,--11 i • I • - ,1 1_.,., . . „. , ..., 4.:.. 1a.!. i --- -el' 0.‘ - 111011-'11111 , • ',.1 - ii., ....,:„..7.3,r iri:11...--,---1.-- 1 TE ,-,-,1.I.1 ill kat, _...v,_.,\ IP ilo,. ,17.,. : j, ''' ( )1 :-r - . .-.gi Ill IFf 11 = "sr" .!'' •-••.,(' E- li/11'1/N= • r.-- . - cm 0 II _-, 0. •' ' -- - —1 • „-' m- .- g•/-i• ..'. , y.i.-..--. ,. , - .. -3' .• - L/---) • 1 L-4:-- -3,- . EL,- , , ....._ g.....,. .-1- _., •,.._ _., •—r- .4, • _ \. ' r' - •c --.--':: - _ . ' - '• ,./..Q....,..- - _. \ •-- -14-,,,,fiz•_ :::,Tr •—'/ ,-r."'-—T.,. \- =;IT< -•=•.7_ -----`"1 ‘ifoc • e F4191.-7,— - •\ —,,•— : -,--; • •• •-•-•••:._-:: r .••••• ..... • '" He.•-•••.•.' _• \ ?.... ....1.74 __ ---- -44:-.1.."6"1111M100,4" ....‘ \1.---44-.: '777 ; '• . ..',.1-.? ••••,...........-1.... , . .......,,,g1 Ili. X,. i--,..\ .F.-.5''....-...,-, ...,. -..-Z.• ••••..wi:-.-:: i: \ ....'tt• -,. , • --7-- ; ." p . ) —this. -/ink - al -se, • N /11,,, .. ,ip... ;;10/ a"nalial Illi:'Ali-"r:... ... '...: 'L..M' .4,....... = . iiith,-.. .„,I.:..„,--:•.,p,,„,,.. ' sn,,' ,-,--.-_-_, i.• , , .-• Jt. ! ..,7...— ' , .e ••- — - -,• ..• • _ - , . qui ,...., A. . \ZAN',, -, ' .1 • ,1 , ‘• ' ' • ' '''' 1 , - anr• ...V : ... ' ''.1- tt, J-..1 ' ' • '_.1._ \''.'. /.,../40.,/,-• .. •—. . „........._--..'"-' _....-< -gr....0— '•••• • .: ‘ -..— r —" .. ' '-..--,......ar,..• --' I - -.--I -h-r".' w p .., _ .::..--: •,, ___' —I. ,•••-„ • . ,. -....______--....... -.,• : . . ..._.-4,- •'74 .'. :'''' --. ..,- ... - '-'-'"-"..----•*,- ...7------- --7 •,i-.--ricr. ,... 1 • n .... A%*•-'' •- --- - i _ - „.,.....,-....,.- . .. ..•• • -- 1 •._, •....,:-.._.: -- .-1 ..... - t-P • _-,.. k. _,-_,.._ 7- .----—7141 -- .--- • ............„,A , '.1 I• . 1,.!/. ' i I .•- . . 4:. . 7-,..-----i. „.—t.'i • • ---`"W ; - • . . -. . . . . ......,..;.i, .... • 1 •__;-- -7..' • i...., itimmuNKIMIIIIE: . ..., • LAND MI 12CIND1 0— . 0-,..., .. . . CI----- i • 0 ----•• I. . .. ... . . [0.- • ,.'gg'17:::,•.1:;;;;;11.zi-i--'1.7..1.. .,... I —7r- 71 .9A IV. IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA • • FINDINGS OF BLIGHT CONDITIONS Slighted Area jas defined in Section 163,340 (8), Florida Statutes] means either: (a) An area in which there are a substantial number of slum, deteriorated or deteriorating structures and conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes or one or more of the following factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a county or municipality and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in Its present condition and use: 1, Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; The Immokalee Redevelopment Area is characterized by a defective or inadequate street layout. Most Immokalee residents walk or bicycle to work, school and shopping. Few adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities are available throughout the Immokalee study area. Problems include: Inadequate street layout and design Lack of shoulders and guardrails along streets adjacent to deep and wide drainage swales Poor access to Commercial and Industrial parking and access problems Few sidewalks available for a predominately pedestrian population A general lack of neighborhood connections to each other The major arterial roadways are State Road 29, Immokalee Road and New Market Road (SR 29A). State Road 29 is a two-lane facility that widens to four lanes through the small downtown area. The four-lane segment is called Main Street and is the focus of redevelopment and economic revitalization. It is the only segment with on-street parking and sidewalks on both sides. The two lane segments of State Road 29 north and east of Main Street are two lanes with no sidewalks. New Market Road is a two lane facility with 100 feet of right-of-way and no sidewalks, paved shoulders, or turn lanes. The remaining right-of-way and truck parking is limestone. Vegetable and fruit packing houses and the State Farmers Market are located along this street. Trucks are encouraged to use this street as a bypass road to avoid the downtown area and to pick up goods for transport. The roadway is in poor condition and maintenance costs are high due to damage by trucks dragging limestone on roadway. Although many people walk or bicycle to work in this area, pathway facilities are unavailable. Immokalee Road intersects with SR 29 at the beginning of Main Street. North of Main Street it narrows to two lanes and has a sidewalk on the west side only. Major problems exist along many of the local roads. There are few sidewalks. Typical local street widths are less than twenty feet required in the Collier County Land Development Code and open stormwater systems are adjacent to roadways without paved shoulders or guardrails. For example, south of State Road 29, along 9th Street, there are deep, wide drainage ditches on both sides of the roadway. There are no sidewalks and no guardrails to safeguard pedestrians and motorists. The roadway width is eighteen feet and there is not enough right of (C) 8 �n 9 A way to construct pathway facilities without converting the open swales to a covered stormwater system. In addition, many residential neighborhoods are not linked to one another and most of the commercial areas are not linked to one another. The immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park lacks adequate water and sewer service and stormwater management facilities to sufficiently handle the projected future development. County Road 846 that leads to Airpark Blvd. is a two-lane facility with narrow lanes and no paved shoulders. This facility does not adequately address the projected increase in truck traffic due to the future development of the airport and industrial park. 2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness: The majority of commercial lots are zoned General Commercial District (C-4) or Heavy Commercial District (C-5). In the C-4 and C-5 zoning district a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet, with a width of 100 feet for commercial development is required. Many of the commercial lots in these zoning districts do not meet the minimum width required for commercial development. Some do not meet either of the lot width or lot square footage requirements. Existing buildings are frequently non-conforming with regards to required minimum lot width, size, setbacks, and buffers. The RMF6 zoning district has a minimum requirement of 6500 square feet with a width of 60 feet for a single family development; 12,000 square feet with a width of 80 feet for a two-family development; and 5,500 square feet per unit with a width of 100 feet for a three or more family residential development. The majority of lots are non-conforming and rebuilding on these lots may require the owner to seek a variance from the development standards. In the South Immokalee area over 50% of the platted lots are non-conforming. The majority of these lots are zoned C-4 or RMF-6. A majority of the mobile home parks in the lmmokalee community were developed in the 1970's and do not meet the minimum standards and permitted densities, The Collier County Land Development Code requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a width of 60 feet for residential development in the VR and MH zoning districts. It is common in the Immokalee Community to have intensive commercial uses located adjacent to residential uses without adequate buffering between the uses. 3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions: According to 1990 Census Data, 1.2 percent of Immokalee' area households lack complete plumbing for exclusive use. In the entire county, this figure is 0.2 percent. In occupied housing units in Immokalee according to the 1990 U.S. Census, 6.8 percent of the owner occupied units and 16 percent of the renter occupied units had more than 1.51 or more persons per room. This figure is .03 for the entire County reflecting a greater degree of overcrowding in the Immokalee area. Based on the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study, there were a total of 4,957 housing units of those 1,282 or 26% are in need of rehabilitation. /a?Cc)1 9 9 ,A In the Immokalee study area, 19 unsafe buildings and 4 unsecure structures were identified from January 1998 to February 2000. Sidewalks are almost entirely absent from the redevelopment area. There is a lack of street lighting in the most of the residential neighborhoods. Wide and deep open swales are present in the South Immokalee neighborhoods. They accumulate stagnate water and trash. The disposal of garbage in the Immokalee area is a problem. Lack of adequate dumpsters for the mobile home parks and commercial establishments results in a serious litter problem. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District covers approximately 27 square miles and most of the Urban area of Immokalee. However, the geographic area served by the district Is considerably smaller. Additional treatment plants and distribution lines will be needed to serve the entire community. The Immokalee Water and Sewer District is under a consent order from the Department of Environmental Protection due to insufficient handling of their effluent. The sprayfields are inadequate. No new sewer hook-ups can be permitted unless the District can show a reduction of flow to the system. There are a few separate collection systems that were permitted prior to the creation of the district. Those systems need to be upgraded and included within the district's authority. An example is the Baker Street area which is on a separate collection system. There have been three reported failures since 1997 where raw sewage was deposited on the ground. 4. Deterioration of site or other improvements: Surface water management problems are present within the entire lmmokalee study area. These problems include localized flooding in neighborhoods in the northeast section of the study area. Many local roads within the study area are poorly drained and experience flooding, as well. Some of the roads are unpaved and poorly drained. In South Immokalee where a high concentration of rental units and pedestrian traffic occurs the typical open drainage ditch is 4 feet deep and 15 feet wide. 5. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land: For purposes of this study, data Is unavailable for this topic. 6. Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area. For purposes of this study, data is unavailable for this topic. (b) An area in which there exists faulty or inadequate street layout; inadequate parking facilities or roadways, bridges or public transportation facilities incapable of handling the volume of traffic flow into or through the area, either at present or following proposed construction. The residential neighborhoods lack connection to one another. /2(J i to 9 A In a primarily pedestrian community, there is a lack of an integrated sidewalk system connecting residential areas with commercial establishments. There is no public transportation system. The commercial lots along Main Street and First Street lack adequate parking facilities. New Market Road does not adequately address the needs of the semi-trucks and trailers that transport the farm products out of the area. Heavy truck traffic on local streets intrudes residential neighborhoods and has had a negative impact on commercial redevelopment activities. SR 29 does not provide the number of lanes needed to adequately serve the Immokalee Regional Airport and Industrial Park. Housing Affordability jas defined in Section 163.355 (8) F,S.] means: An area in which there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly. A housing unit is considered affordable if the monthly payments do not exceed 35 percent of the monthly income for principal, interests, taxes, and insurance. According to the 1994 Immokalee Housing Study 36 percent of the households with a mortgage and 40 percent of renter occupied households pay more than 35 percent of their income for housing. According to the study of those persons making less than $10,000, 72 percent pay more than 35 percent of their income to rent. The median household income in 1990 according to the U.S. Census Bureau was $15,170. Forty- five percent of the population in Immokalee is below the poverty level. The population growth, as well as high seasonal farm labor population, has produced a critical demand for housing according to the 1999 Empowerment Alliance of Southwest Florida Strategic Plan. There is a shortage of low and moderate income housing in the Immokalee Community CONCLUSION OF FINDINGS OF BLIGHT It is the conclusion of this study that the Immokalee study area clearly has a predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout, unsafe or unsanitary conditions, and deterioration of a site or other improvements as set forth in Chapter 163 for designation as a blighted area and that rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of the Immokalee study area is necessary and advisable in the furtherance of the public interest of residents of Collier County. • • /, CC. >> 43 9 A IMMOKALEE REDEVELOPMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE E ALG N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30, TWP 46 RNG 29, THENCE E ALG THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30, 29, 28, 27, AND 26 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S ALG THE W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW 'A OF SW '/4 SEC 25, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SWV4 OF SW '/4 SEC 25, THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W '/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 36, TWP 46, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF THE W /2 OF NW % SEC 36, THENCE W TO THE W '/4 CRN SECTON 36, THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 36 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 30, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6, THENCE W TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W TO THE S '/4 CNR SEC 1 AND THE N '/4 CNR OF SEC 12, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE S '/4 CNR SEC 12 AND THE N '/ CNR OF SEC 13, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THE W '/4 CNR SEC 13 AND THE E 1/4 CNR OF SEC 14, TWP 47, RNG 29, CONT W TO THE W '/ CNR OF SEC 14 AND THEE '/4 CNR OF SEC 15, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 16 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 16, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE N ALG THE W LINE OF SEC 16 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9, TWP 47, RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 5, TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6, TWP 47, RNG 29, AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1, TWP 47, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE E '/ CNR OF SEC 1, THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD, THENCE ALG THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY, NLY, NWLY, WLY, SWLY TO THE 1NTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO - THE NW CNR OF SEC 35, THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 25, TWP 46, RNG 28, THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B. 12 9A S 9b 1 I SLVI 0 0 m a _ .X... Ix i 11 — .--- +�K f/! z. ; ,' i Q / F.. — — .1't� p y Z —. W . _ , , . _ W 01 O a cri t . �N �fi _ N2 cc < , te :,p l> a / =p r ^` i•1. W i �-= x —� r: ` — L4 , — W _ J §a i ii V12 f�' -Fri I W _ • W go. IV — t7 1 re _ _ a e . 9 _ ..._ /atL) 1 I S 9to, 1 I S LL► 1 iil I 1'' 13 G''S 9 A 12 c 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RELATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; DECLARING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO BE THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF ADVISORY BOARDS FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT WITH OTHER RESOLUTIONS AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has adopted a resolution finding the existence of one or more blighted areas In the unincorporated area of the County and further finding that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment or combination thereof, in such areas Is necessary in the Interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida;and WHEREAS, to carry out and Implement the redevelopment powers and actions contemplated by Part III,Chapter 163, Florida Statutes,within such areas, It is necessary that a community redevelopment agency be created;and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to serve as the community redevelopment agency and have advisory boards consisting of citizens and property owners in the areas providing advice to the Board concerning the redevelopment of the areas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. findings. The foregoing recitals are hereby adopted and Incorporated herein to the same extent as If they were set forth In this section. Section 2. peclaration of Board of County Commissioners as Community RedevelopmentAaency. As provided in Section 163,357(1), Florida Statutes (1999), the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, does hereby declare itself to be the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency as an additional duty of office, and does further declare that all the rights, powers, duties, privileges, and immunities vested by Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (1999) in such a community redevelopment agency are hereby vested in the Board of County Commissioners, subject to all responsibilities and liabilities imposed or Incurred. Section 2. Separate Legal Entity. The members of the Board of County Commissioners are the members of the Community Redevelopment Agency, but the members constitute the head of a legal entity, separate, distinct, and independent from the Board of County Commissioners. Section 3. Creation of Advisory Bofrds. There are to be created, under separate resolutions by the Community Redevelopment Agency, advisory boards for each component 12 C 1 9A area of the community redevelopment area in the unincorporated area of Collier County,which shall be composed of citizens, residents, property owners and business owners or persons engaged In business In the area, as provided in the resolution of the Community Redevelopment Agency providing for the appointment of such members. The duties and responsibilities of such advisory boards shall be set forth in the resolution of the Community Redevelopment Agency. Section 4. Conflicts. All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with any of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed. Section 5. Severability. If any section or portion of a section of this resolution proves to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity,force,or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Section B. effective Date.This resolution shall become effective immediately upon Its passage and adoption. Section 7. This Resolution adopted after motion,second and majority vote this 1 LJ day of ,2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF C SIONERS -DWIGH'f E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER UNTY, FLORIDA e J1�t D C BY. _ 7'•� • TIMOT .CONSTA NE,C IRMAN .Attest.all :to Chairman's sigrratur*only. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Luie*At 6 )42:e.,g David C.Weigel County Attomey 2 9 I 12C Resolution No.2000-181 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT; MAKING FINDINGS; ADOPTING A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; AUTHORIZING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the County Commission adopted Resolution 2000-82 on March 14, 2000, finding the existence of blight conditions in two areas In the unincorporated area of Collier County,as more particularly described in that resolution(such area being referred to herein as the"Community Redevelopment Area`);and WHEREAS, a Community Redevelopment Plan as contemplated by Part III, Chapter 183, Florida Statutes (1999), has been prepared which addresses the redevelopment needs In the Community Redevelopment Area;and WHEREAS, on May 18, 2000, the County's Planning Commission, as the County's Local Planning Agency for purposes of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Ad, determined the proposed community redevelopment plan is in conformity with the County's comprehensive plan for the County as a whole and recommended the County Commission approve the proposed plan;and WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency on May 23, 2000 approved the proposed community redevelopment plan and recommended It to the County Commission;and WHEREAS, a copy of the proposed community redevelopment plan was submitted by the Community Redevelopment Agency to the County Commission, es the governing body of Collier County, Florida,and to Big Corkscrew Fire District; East Naples Fire District; Immokalee Fire District; Collier County Board of County Commissioners; and the Collier County Mosquito Control District, as taxing authorities which levy ad valorem taxes on taxable real property contained within the geographic boundaries of the Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS,the notices required by Section 183.348,Florida Statutes(1999),have been published and mailed as required therein, and a public hearing regarding the proposed community redevelopment plan was held, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: 9 A 12C SECTION t, Jncorooratlno Recitals. The Board of County Commissioners finds, declares and determines that the matters set forth in the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as a part of this Resolution. SECTION 2, Findino of Conformance with Comprehensive Plan. The County Commission hereby finds, determines and declares that the proposed community redevelopment plan for the Community Redevelopment Area attached hereto as Exhibit"A"(the "Community Redevelopment Plan") conforms to the general comprehensive plan of Collier County as a whole. SECTION 3, Findlna of Adeauacv of Recreational Facilities. The County Commission hereby finds, determines and declares that the Community Redevelopment Plan gives due consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreational areas and facilities that are desirable for neighborhood improvement, with special consideration for the health, safety, and welfare of children residing in the general vicinity of the are covered by the plan. SECTION 4. Finding of Relocation. The County Commission finds that a feasible method for the relocation of families who will be displaced from the community redevelopment area In decant, safe, and sanitary dwelling accommodations within their means and without undue hardship to such families is contained in the Community Redevelopment Plan. SECTION 6t Findino of Maximum Opportunity. The County Commission hereby finds that although the Community Redevelopment Plan contemplates most Improvements will be undertaken by the County or the CRA, the Community Redevelopment Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the County as a whole, for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the community redevelopment area by private enterprise to the extent contemplated by said plan. SECTION ta, Adgoton of Community Redevelopment Plan. The County Commission does hereby adopt the Community Redevelopment Plan as the community redevelopment plan for the Community Redevelopment Area and authorizes and directs the Community Redevelopment Agency to proceed with the Implementation of the plan. SECfQN 7, Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval by the County Commission. 2 9 12C SECTION 8, This Resolution adopted after motion,second and majority vote this 13 day of.a tl. - ,2000, ATTEST: BOARD OF TY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT C.BROOK,CLERK COLLIER OUNTY, FLORIDA / TIMOT .CONSTA INE,CHAIRMAN Attest.as to Cherlaut's tipaiture o'1Iy. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY David C.Welgel County Attorney 3 9 A RESOLUTION NO.2004- 17g 17 F A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FINDING A BLIGHTED AREA TO EXIST AND EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. WHEREAS, on March 14, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (Board) adopted Resolution No. 2000-82, finding a specified area of Immokalee to be blighted and creating the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area;and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2004, the Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board met and recommended expansion of the boundaries of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area(Area),as set forth in Exhibit A(Expanded Area); and WHEREAS, on April 13, 2004, the Board received and considered a report and presentation by County staff identifying current economic conditions and considered the applicability of various economic incentives within this Expanded Area; and WHEREAS, after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions in the Expanded Area and having received and considered such other evidence of the conditions in the Expanded Area presented to it, the Board now desires to proceed In accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part Ill, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can be accomplished In the Expanded Area and that certain actions are appropriate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present in the Expanded Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The Board of County Commissioners, consistent with § 163.355,Fla. Stat. (2003), does hereby find: (a) Based upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Board that the following conditions exist in the Expanded Area proposed to be added to the existing Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area: 1. Past conditions continue to be present in the Expanded Area that are Page 5 of 3 9 A ?F . .. detrimental to the sound growth of the County and which substantially impair or arrest the growth within the Expanded Area, and present conditions and uses in the Expanded Area are detrimental to the public health, safety,morals and public welfare; and 2. There is a faulty and inadequate lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility,or usefulness in the Expanded Area; and 3. The aggregate assessed values of real property In the Expanded Area for ad valorem tax purposes have failed to show any appreciable increase over the past five years; and 4. There are inadequate and outdated building density patterns in the Expanded Area; and 5. There are unsanitary and unsafe conditions in the Expanded Area;and 6. There has been a deterioration of site and other improvements In the Expanded Area. (b) The notices required by Section 163.346 and Section 163.361 (3), Florida Statutes (2003), have been timely published or mailed in accordance with said statutes. (c) Action must be ta+ken immediately to prevent further blight and deterioration and to protect and enhance public expenditures previously made in the Expanded Ares. 4 Section 2. Finding of Necessity. The Board of County Commissioners, based upon the evidence presented to It and in the public record with respect to the conditions found In Section 1 (a), above, finds that a"blighted area" as defined in Section 163.340 (8), Florida Statutes,exists within the boundaries of Collier County in the area identified, described, and depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution (the Expanded Area), and further finds that the rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such Expanded Area described is necessary in the Interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida. Section 3. Community Redevelopment Area. Based upon the facts presented and contained in the public record, the Board of County Commissioners finds the Expanded Area constitutes a "community redevelopment area" as defined in Section 163.340 (10), Florida Statutes (2003), and hereby adds the Expanded Area to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, Section 4. Conflicts, All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with any Page 2 of 3 9A 17F ' - of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed, provided, however, nothing herein Is intended nor should be applied to affect, repeal, alter, amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a "blighted area" for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act,specifically including Resolution 2003-82, Section 5. Severability. If any section or portion of a section of this Resolution, Including any part of Exhibit A,proves to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to invalidate or Impair the validity,force, or effect of any other section or part of this resolution. Should any area constituting part of the Expanded Area be severed from the Expanded Area by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall constitute part of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area for purposes of this Resolution, Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective Immediately upon adoption. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this day of , 2004, ATTESTr +^o.;, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWI.0 T•E.'BF'faCK,CI r OF COLLIER OUNTY, FLORIDA By;' cd.4.4.4, At By: I-m,.ci tEs : to•LhtR � DONN FIALA, Chairman stgnatts of I j. -0 roved. ' •to formg legal sufficiency: Patrick 6. hite Assistant County Attorney irefiln 1 f ,'' ate" ! /287 _ i.. Page 3 of 3 9 ' ?Fq EXHIBIT A , (Sheet I of 2) Existing&Proposed Community Redevelopment Area R28E I R29E l _ R30E N 11 •I It ❑ O 11 11 I 11 II Ir 11 a 11 II 11 l.� I1 11 II I1 11 11 tp =• 1S1'A I 1- • n �---� , • II N n s n x 1 ` n • _ I. : I 1 II • ■.III IP1upa.ad CM Una. t...,l..t.«III...„. •111 Irl,,, A._ Y • nwr [ r H I II 11 11 ` ` 1 1I 411 1 1 1 ... 11 x 11 N n • n 11 Il II 71 » I nbM J Pd ) M .. n-.-- IL 1 It Cu frCounty O Plapawdcornrroq R vxoP14MM/ Exhibit A '+ II \\'Ann.to d Add.d b Camlutry llNMoMprwrll Arlo rrlumnwr.•re.r.r•••...yx,.m,.....^,,.1wr ow or • • • 1 . I 9 A hF EXHIBIT A (Sheet 2 of 2) Description of the Expanded Areas of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area (Area) In addition to the area described in Exhibit A of Resolution 2000-82, the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area shall be expanded to include the following areas: Township 46 South, Range 28 East, Sections 26, 27, 34 and that portion of Section 35 not already included in the Area; Township 47 South,Range 28 East, the northern halves of' Sections 2 and 3; Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Sections 7 and 8; Township 46 South, Range 30 East, Sections 30 and 31; and Township 46 South, Range 29 East, those portions of Sections 25 and 36 not already included in the Area. v., uir•.•.,".., ..,-<.� c�. 'toYGa IrI11vU 1CJ HIVil KtI.UK.UJ t'AUt t?b 9 A ! A RESOLUTION NO.2004- 354 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FINDING A BLIGHTED AREA TO EXIST, AND EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. WHEREAS, on March 14, 2000, the Board if County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (Board) adopted Resolution No. 2000-82, finding a specified area of Immokatee to be blighted and creating the Immokelee Community Redevelopment Area (Area);and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, finding edJacent portions of the Immokelea Community Redevelopment Area to be blighted, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2004-179,expanding the boundaries of the Ares;end WHEREAS,on October 27,2004,the lmmokelee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board met and recommended further expansion of the boundaries of the Immokelee Community Redevelopment Area,as set forth in Exhibit A (Expanded Area);and WHEREAS,on December 14, 2004, the Community Redevelopment Area Board received and considered o report and presentation by County staff identifying current economic conditions within this Expanded Area;and WHEREAS, after having considered the determinations and the facts and evidence of conditions in the Expanded Area and having received and considered such other evidence of the conditions in the Expanded Area presented to It, the Board now desires to proceed In accordance with the authorization and powers granted by Part lit, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, to establish the necessary means by which redevelopment can be accomplished in the Expanded Area and that certain actions are appropriate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present in the Expanded Area, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, Findings. The Board of County Commissioners, consistent with § 163.355, Fla.Stet, (2003),does hereby find: (a) Dosed upon the facts and evidence presented to and considered by the Page 1 of 3 ti, . . ___ -- vv. V 9 A 8A Board that the following conditions exist In the Expended Area proposed to be added to the existing Immokalea Community Redevelopment Area: 1. Pest conditions continue to be present in the Expanded Area that are detrimental to the sound growth of the County and which substantially Impair or arrest the growth within the Expanded Area,and present conditions and uses In the Expended Area are detrimental to the public health,safety, morals and public welfare;and 2. There is a faulty and inadequate let layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility,or usefulness to the Expanded Ares;and 3, The aggregate assessed values of real property in the Expanded Area for ad valorem tax purposes have faded to show any appreciable increase over the-past five years;and 4. There are inadequate end outdated building density patterns in the Expanded Area;and 6. There are unsanitary and unsafe conditions In the Expanded Area, (b) The notices required by Section 183.348 and Section 163.361 (3), Florida Statutes(2003), have been timely published or melted in accordance with said statutes. (c) Action must be taken immediately to prevent further blight and deterioration i and to protect and enhance public expenditures previously made In the Expanded Area. Section 2, Finding of Necessity. The Board of County Commissioners, based upon the evidence presented to it and in the public record with respect to the conditions found in Section 1 (a),above, finds that a"blighted area"as defined in Section 163.340 (8), Florida Statutes,exists within the boundaries of Collier County in the area identified, described, and depicted on Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution (the Expanded Area), end further finds that the rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such Expanded Area described is necessary in the Interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County,Florida, Section 3. g rnrpunity Redevelopment Area. Based upon the facts presented and contained In the public record, the Board of County Commissioners finds the Expanded Area constitutes a 'community redevelopment area as defined in Section 163.340 (10), Florida Statutes (2003), and hereby adds the Expanded Area to the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area. Page 2(e. !O/A01,4VVJ l,+•<J L t rYOY VO I'rlPVUIG) MIYII rCGI,URIJ.D rNUC 9 A BA . . '' Section 4. Conflicts. All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with any of the provisions of this resolution are hereby repealed, provided, however, nothing herein Is Intended nor should be applied to affect, repeal, alter, amend or supersede any previous resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners finding any other area or areas within Collier County to be a "blighted area" for purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act,specifically including Resolution 2000.82. Section 5, Severability. If any section or portion of a section of this Resolution, including any part of Exhibits A end B,proves to be invalid,unlawful,or unconstitutional, it shell not be held to Invalidate or Impair the validity,force.or effect of any other section or part of this resolution, Should any area constituting part of the Expanded Area be severed from the Expanded Area by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall constitute part of the lmmoksiae Community Redevelopment Area for purposes of this Resolution. Section 6. Effective.,Dato. This Resolution shall become effective Immediately upon adoption, This 2esolulion adopted after motion, second and majority vote this /ttsy of _ 2)[(1 ar1j/ ,2004. ATTEST;,,•r.or,trp"q' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ❑WIG : r:PCiC,'tark OF COLLIER OUNTY,FLORIDA B By: I m+.c.� -Qc. n $ DONNA IALA, Chairman _'tirh f``; ,411,rov:' . ;tic •fi?kt legal sufficiency: r#t'% 4 IN,-atrickL. hi e Assistant County Attorney it N 1 .._ " Ipda V•i440 Data j2-4•ot1 Race 1,,,a} ik Page 3 of 3 n '• 7.�.,5G1/LGGO lb: Y:jy!%4HliL MINUIE.5 AND KELURV5 PAGE 9 A .y 11. __..,_. i 4. ,, . .. u la R ,*2 : N CVY I o% pp Q f f R ! pp R- g I- gn "- ' V *r Y ' G U ' NI . \\Ii ''�vi ay N a R: py \I g n (11 I ".•., •, 1lI � ( �LUV Ny Q a N I NY NNry $p TKKK,«._.. n T _ yJ V 4.. .1 _ ..ii. i . ct A / "T..yT— Y Y —H .z> x . a �1 I Ui i-ifl .is' :. .-1j. • y{�q I-... p A .N „` .._„, [45 i PI -L.'"ukTr• Y N fN N l_.,_1....._ Y r O~ a 6 m 1— I g Pi i 4 18 2 N n °nt 9 1 w ;Ir.] I p - p m .- fOrp N n O M O m.- f ♦ c{,,,501/2005 16:25 2397748406 MINUTES AND RECORDS PAGE 19 A 8 A EXHIBIT B Description of the Expanded Areas of the Imnaokalee Community Redevelopment_Area In addition to the area described in Exhibit B of Resolution 2000-82, the Inatnokalee Community Redevelopment Area shall be expanded to include the following areas: The southern halves of Sections 2 and 3, Township 47 South, Range 28 East; and the portions not already included in the Redevelopment Area of Sections 12, 13, and 14, Township 47 South, Range 29 East. • 9 A ORDINANCE NO. 200p-42 cjoN 914 AN ORDINANCE OF COLLIER COUNTY, ".I`` ? 5 FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING A of i4' REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; ttv PROVIDING FOR THE FUNDING OF A REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND FOR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; DETERMINING THE TAX INCREMENT TO BE DEPOSITED IN THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; ESTABLISHING THE BASE YEAR FOR DETERMINING ASSESSED VALUES OF PROPERTY IN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA FOR TAX INCREMENT PURPOSES; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT BY TAXING AUTHORITIES IN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; APPOINTING THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AS THE TRUSTEE OF THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; • EXEMPTING CERTAIN SPECIAL DISTRICTS FROM THE ANNUAL REQUIREMENT TO APPROPRIATE INCREMENT REVENUES TO THE REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND AND yo AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE r r m PREPARATION OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTING EACH SUCH — EXEMPTION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE : `° :- DATE. r o� ry Po ui WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-82 adopted by ttWiCatfrity Commission of Collier County, Florida (the"County Commission")on March 14,2000, it was determined that one or more blighted areas exist within Collier County, Florida, and that the rehabilitation,conservation or redevelopment, or a combination thereof,of such area is necessary In the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of Collier County;and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-83 adopted by the County Commission on March 14, 2000, the County Commission created the Community Redevelopment Agency of Collier County,Florida(the'Agency");and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-/tQ/adopted by the County Commission on June 13, 2000, the County Commission adopted a community 1 9A redevelopment plan (the "Plan") for the community redevelopment area as fully described in that Resolution and In Exhibit"A"attached hereto and made a part hereof (the"Community Redevelopment Area");and WHEREAS, in order to plan and implement community redevelopment within the Community Redevelopment Area It Is necessary that a redevelopment trust fund be established and created for said area as provided in Section 163.387, Florida Statutes(1999)(the"Act");and WHEREAS, It is appropriate and reasonable for certain special taxing districts to be exempted from the requirement to make an annual appropriation of "Increment revenues" to the redevelopment trust fund being created by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, notice of the County Commission's intention to create a redevelopment trust fund has been published in a local newspaper of general circulation and mailed to all "taxing authorities" (as hereinafter defined)in accordance with Section 163.346, Florida Statutes(1999); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA: SECTION 1. There Is hereby established and created, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, a Community Redevelopment Trust Fund (the"Fund")for the Community Redevelopment Area,which fund shall be utilized and expended for the purposes of and In accordance with the Plan, Including any amendments or modifications thereto, Including any"community redevelopment,"as that term Is defined in Section 163.340(9),Florida Statutes(1999),under the Plan. SECTION 2. The monies to be allocated to and deposited Into the Fund shall be used to finance "community redevelopment" within the Area according to tax Increment revenues attributed to the Area, which shall be appropriated by the Agency. The Agency shall utilize the funds and revenues paid into and earned by the Fund for community redevelopment purposes as provided In the Plan and as permitted by law. The Fund shall exist for the duration of the"community redevelopment" undertaken by the Agency pursuant to the Plan to the extent permitted by the Act. Monies shall be held 2 9 A In the Fund by Collier County,for and on behalf of the Agency, and disbursed from the Fund as provided by the Agency. SECTION 3. There shall be paid Into the Fund each year by each of the "taxing authorities,"as that term is defined In Section 163.340(2), Florida Statutes(1999) except for those special districts exempted from such requirement, levying ad valorem taxes within the Community Redevelopment Area, a sum equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the Incremental Increase in ad valorem taxes levied each year by that taxing authority, as calculated in accordance with Section 5 of this Ordinance and the Act, based on the base tax year established In Section 4 of this Ordinance(such annual sum being hereinafter referred to as the"tax Increment"). SECTION 4. The most recent assessment roll used In connection with the taxation of property prior to the effective date of this Ordinance shall be the assessment roll of taxable real property in Collier County, Florida, prepared by the Property Appraiser of Collier County, Florida, and certified pursuant to Section 193.122, Florida Statues (1999) reflecting valuation of real property for purposes of ad valorem taxation as of January 1, 1999 (the "base year value"), and all deposits Into the Fund shall be In the amount of tax increment calculated as provided in Section 5 hereof based upon increases In valuation of taxable real property from the base year value as reflected on the preliminary assessment roll of taxable real property In the community redevelopment area in the unincorporated area in collier County, Florida, prepared by the Property Appraiser of Collier County, Florida,filed with the Department of Revenue pursuant to Section 193.1142,Florida Statutes(1999). SECTION 5. The tax increment shall be determined and appropriated annually by each taxing authority, and shall be an amount equal to ninety-five percent (95%)of the difference between: (a)That amount of ad valorem taxes levied each year by all taxing authorities on taxable real property located within the geographic boundaries of the Community Redevelopment Area;and (b) That amount of ad valorem taxes which would have been produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for all taxing authorities,upon the total of the assessed value of the taxable real property in the Community Redevelopment Area as shown upon the 3 9 A assessment roll used In connection with the taxation of such property by all taxing authorities,prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 6. All taxing authorities shall annually appropriate to and cause to be deposited In the Fund the tax increment determined pursuant to the Act and Section 5 of this Ordinance at the beginning of each fiscal year thereof as provided In the Act. The obligation of each taxing authority to annually appropriate the tax increment for deposit in the Fund shall commence Immediately upon the effective date of this Ordinance and continue to the extent permitted by the Act so long as any Indebtedness pledging"increment revenue"is to be paid and so long as the Plan Is In effect. SECTION 7. The fund shall be established and maintained as a separate trust fund by the Agency so that the Fund may be promptly and effectively administered and utilized by the Agency expeditiously and without undue delay for its statutory purpose pursuant to the Plan. SECTION 8. The governing body of the Agency shall be the trustees of the Fund and shall be responsible for the receipt,custody, disbursement, accountability, management,investment and proper application of all monies paid Into the Fund. SECTION 9. Pursuant to Section 163.387(2)(d), Florida Statutes(1999), the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,as the governing body of Collier County, Florida, does hereby exempt the following special districts from the annual requirement to appropriate "increment revenues" and cause that amount to be deposited In the community redevelopment trust fund created by this ordinance: East Naples Fire District;Collier County Mosquito Control District; Big Corkscrew Fire District; and Immokalee Fire District. The appropriate County officials and consultants and advisors to the County and the CRA are hereby authorized and directed to prepare in conjunction with each such special district an interlocal agreement establishing the conditions of the exemption, including the period of time for which the exemption is granted. SECTION 10. Any and all ordinances or resolutions or parts of ordinances or resolutions In conflict herewith are hereby repealed. 4 9 A SECTION 11. If any part of this Ordinance Is held to be Invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this Ordinance,which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 12. The Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, is hereby authorized and directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to each of the taxing authorities and to the Property Appraiser of Collier County,Florida. SECTION 13. This Ordinance shall take effect Immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County the 13 day of June,2000. ATTEST: ',•`•`, BOARD OF CO LONERS 1'DWIGH7`C..BRQCK,CLERK COLLIER C TY,FLORIDA C . BY: • TIMOT J ONSTA , H Atteit ras h pia Ansan': 31$4ature only. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY This ordinance flied with the $¢ etary of tote's Office the day of tote's , anOf? � � and acknowledgement of that ( Win received thls •V clay David C.Weigel By Nam,clock ➢. County Attorney 5 9A EXHIBIT A BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTION BEG SW CNR SECT 2,TWP 50,RNG 25,N 630',E 662',S 427', E 200',N 270',E TO THE E RAN LINE OF BROOKSIDE DRIVE,S TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 10,SUNSET SUB, E TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 6,SUNSET SUB,S 92', E TO THE NW CRN OF LOT 55, BLK A,ROCK CREEK PARK,N TO THE NW CNR OF LOT 10,BLK B, ROCK CREEK PARK,E TO THE E SECT LINE SECT 2,TWP 50, RNG 25, S TO THE NW CNR OF SECT 12,TWP 50, RNG 25,E 670',S 773', W 200', S 735',W 200',S 990',E 460',S 330',E 972', S 1174',SWLY 481',NWLY 523',W 95', SWLY 730'TO THE NELY RNV LINE U.S.41,CONT SWLY TO THE SWLY R/W LINE U.S.41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U.S.41 TO ITS INTERSECT WITH THE W RNV LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE, S TO THE N R/W LINE OF WEEKS AVE,W 761', N 1355',W TO THE W RAN LINE OF PINE STREET,N TO THE SE CNR OF LOT 2,BLK K, INOMAH SUB,W 100', N TO THE N RNV OF WASHINGTON AVE,CONT NWLY AND WLY ALG NLY R/W LINE WASHINGTON AVE TO THE SW CNR OF LOT 2, BLK C,INOMAH SUB,W TO THE W R/W LINE OF FREDRICK ST,N TO NE CNR LOT 9,COC-LEE-TERRACE SUB,W TO THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 11,TWP 50,RNG 25,N TO THE SW SECT CNR OF SECT 2,TWP 50,RNG 25 AND THE POB. AND BEG SE CNR SECT 23,TWP 50,RNG 25,N ALG THE E SECT LINES OF SECT 23 AND 14, TWP 50,RNG 25,TO E V CNR SECT14,TWP 50,RNG 25, E TO THE SE CNR LOT 6,CREWS SUB, N TO THE S LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, E TO THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U.S.41, NWLY ALG THE SWLY RAN LINE OF U.S.41 TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W RAN LINE OF BAYSHORE DRIVE,S TO THE N RAN LINE OF WEEKS AVE,W 761',N 1355',W TO THE W RNV LINE OF PINE STREET,S TO THE S RNV LINE OF MANGROVE STREET,W TO THE NW CNR LOT 14, BLK F,HALDEMAN RIVER SUB,S TO THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK, SWLY ALG THE N LINE OF HALDEMAN CREEK TO ITS INTSECT WITH THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14,TWP 50, RNG 25,S ALG THE W SECT LINE OF SECT 14 AND 23,TWP 50,RNG 25, TO THE SW CNR OF SECT 23,TWP 50, RNG 25,E TO THE SE CNR OF SECT 23,TWP 50, RNG 25 AND THE FOB, 9 A • BAYSHORE / DATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOMENT AREA .. _ , ...,..:„...,......,„.7._ . V ....1— imic • E- . . 1... x wpm:1.7.:..2114)51:11.... l . anhorg do.:11, gradirfr 1 1 *tett 1 ...-0Tves, wrozollom 1111:111,ICH iiirrhm.,ri ;%;,...14i! - ..A:I ilitrigilinlI111111 WI wi[ri;Qt.:MI*7131Ni 11 '....1:i7-'• ::1 .1......1.: P. )444 kte:1711 7111111 IMMIIIII' . . . - - - ' mir—smi 2ONAIIIIIPittop:irmli im, = mammas=amiiiim F,Ii•; ::',..:':W • 111111111 .‘,..,_, , .. Ni4itri:',..,413:=MEM nimnam Iagijca;=cm k*b.y4i.hall.r•I 1.:::gigg•IN: "..MintirTimmitit.-.‘ 1.14,1.-19411"....rf-NE —r" .-m :', lii Pim=PA IA : ninu -v--7-.7:**0:14,74„igivihirti.. Nisiiqsai 0%. 1_yall fl !Ilitals,14.*„q421:11;r4 ;;;;:i 1=I • lagrasp;„::::;,.•:.4 On ttit.i..*: i".4 r:1. •:,,,-.1 ..---7.. ::716 Mg at iniht,4 Orailili I igNit7; ..ri. :1 5 .2 t•.i kiiiilial. AIR \444 I r; ouulegm. ill-am b:4 ilir AV,4 L ) ! itti, ..a • 1) 1 .... iia.,.,. .. _.....:1 tit...:,,•... .. ;iv !; i-= .4:1.-•••• magnv,":::::::::oz: S, Vilt. ,..1 i..........., ,...,,.)a,i,::::Iirii zilTifir Etimulimmr. IV 440p _so:..-14i94111."0A-7 iliEgf:::::itq, 1.114,43 1111111111111MIL. *,.• - 41 .I:4iii4.,..., ,,..,:r.,,.. i! : ---___ .. , , ....,„k .......mii ,::......7:.......4 k ... .4.mon 11 DI let,4#,‘k ,k A BE cmui....".Irik\fr VI i Eir4i 123---' 3_MINM hi.... • '.0 iihr— I % 4i . " 0,..,...!...... • ...:--r- :......,..., .4 i ill- tan.14. i.,4k II II&mon; IN1111111111;liiiitaii,PC2- ::3::::”1:::::1;"1---1.7.16. 4i4)\ 'sr,,r4a , 1 MMIIIE11111111111 ::= —EC= 1) i . i •r..-7:471.1Fe.:-.:-.1 11.1111/...Az v --- -7 nuiliiisttinos 1111111101111111110:, MIN II:,3 •.....Now.- Fill11:1:111b""t IMMINO=Blibil111111,011f1114111111. _ c.? -- -tioliiminnot ins LAND lat LIVEND i I \ fi 0'•'.. [ - 11 0.•-• ,•,....... ' l' 0- , r r ,* 9 A IMMOKALEE COMMUNLTY REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTIQ 4 BEG AT THE NW CNR SEC 25,TWP 46,RNG 28,THENCE E ALG N LINE SEC 25 TO NE CRN OF SEC 25 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 30,TWP 46 RNG 29,THENCE E ALG THE N LINES OF SECTONS 30,29,28,27,AND 26 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25,TWP 46, RNG 29,THENCE S ALG THE W LINE SEC 25 TO THE NW CNR OF THE SW%OF SW%SEC 25,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF THE SW%OF SW'/,SEC 25,THENCE S TO THE S SEC LINE OF SEC 25 AND THE NE CNR OF THE W%OF NW Y,OF SEC 36,TWP 46, RNG 29,THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF THE W OF NW'/,SEC 36,THENCE W TO THE W'/ CRN SECTON 36,THENCE S TO THE SW CNR SEC 36 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 1,TWP 47,RNG 29,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 1 AND THE NW CNR OF SEC 6,TWP 47,RNG 30,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 6,THENCE S TO THE SE CNR OF SEC 6,THENCE W TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1,TWP 47,RNG 29,THENCE W TO THE S CNR SEC 1 AND THE N Y.CNR OF SEC 12,TWP 47,RNG 29,THENCE S TO THE S CNR SEC 12 AND THE N CNR OF SEC 13,TWP 47,RNG 29,THENCE S TO THE CENTER OF SEC 13, THENCE W TO THE W Y,CNR SEC 13 AND THE E'/+CNR OF SEC 14,TWP 47, RNG 29, CONT W TO THE W'/+CNR OF SEC 14 AND THEE%CNR OF SEC 15,TWP 47,RNG 29, THENCE S TO SE CNR OF SEC 15,THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 15 AND 16 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 18,TWP 47, RNG 29,THENCE N ALG THE W LINE OF SEC 16 AND 9 TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 9,TWP 47,RNG 29 AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 6,TWP 47, RNG 29, THENCE W ALG THE S LINE OF SEC 5 AND 6 TO THE SW CNR OF SEC 6,TWP 47, RNG 29, AND THE SE CNR OF SEC 1,TWP 47,RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE E' CNR OF SEC 1, THENCE W TO THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD,THENCE ALG THE SHORELINE OF LAKE TRAFFORD NELY, NLY,NWLY,WLY,SWLY TO THE INTERSECTON OF THE LAKE TRAFFORD SHORELINE AND THE W SEC LINE OF SEC 35, TWP 46,RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 35,THENCE E TO THE NE CNR OF SEC 35 AND THE SW CNR OF SEC 25,TWP 46, RNG 28,THENCE N TO THE NW CNR OF SEC 25 AND THE P.O.B. _ ______._.._ _ __.... ..._____ 9 5 9 V.J. I S ZV J. • W i i i W m m a o yco M N In 1 I I-. i - • ." n to 1- W, r N r� ti i� a wh. i "llfl ., o N M en aW rag, W O = °•j ' 'If Of ru �i•; J .. • ce •ii'�•�' V:/_ "■ 0o •i'%'�i!" to llll 1W a-v.i!in:,�_ en co I N WooI III g ill Iii en L N N _41 1 W W ea Q N o 5 I 1 N C N M X O N • i d ly ]� J d a o I I f 5 9b 1 I 5 Lb J. 9 A STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2000-42 r rrj G Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissions �4h the 13th day of June, 2000, during Regular Session. m` 1,1 -'O cn r:3 L✓ WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board�_ u'+ 6 m uo County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 14tt day of June, 2000. DWIGHT E. BROCK/ Clerk of Courts'land Ex-officio to Board of .if..' County Commise.8ners' ..�Ji ;,, , • By:Karen Schoch,'' '' , Deputy Cler}c' ' ""' 9A APPENDIX B 9 A S 9t, 1 I S L'17 L HJ HJ o o 1 ro r) IY IY ,I. / JLemaraint. t, A .1 _____ , 1 7 -1 < t h / (-_ N-N 7 AIMININIMMINIIII Vigil III 1 1 z z 0 - .....4. N.).- . Li_I 0 HI l `i _ 11,4',. -,,j.4. it r . - F--- cCIN) , b71*/•410,,,Aimi WI •I I__ < IV '2 ----- . • j,, ,:...,,,, 'AL, ' L N 0 2 n'I.1.....4..a1 r. .1.1.•,, 1 .w.w.a ,., o cL 0 n Y 1i 7...i i i i 4 il t :Ill} 30i 1!---11111111T .,, ' i i 1 0 2 \...... .4..e•.. • ini iiii',..., 0 . -,...v.-A.1,44iU:111.111 tl,TgA • > 0 t J .,:s.S.'iiliNall..74.4111" Ili i... \e‘:;4,i.'`,:•141,1351Mir::::,:irs .1.1E11 :telly. A . no _ ... Li 7 . ,M !gal:Iriell 6 CY .F.,- .-. .., . ma - -- . 11 gitliu•...L:,..„., _ R A - I i hiliali7f kW e,gi Li(f) ig:: .04€'',--,•-lm 1 '6 = tilx _.1_, 8'X ;..L.1 l ----I I 1 I kW il 11115! 1 a 6 81 .g tiggg . Ig i II ___:.1:11 ,, - - MIMI'''. o a giq iv 111ii ' ati = .!iim ill ,0-; 0 F. ' -11:7-1'6 41110 i lin-11111 ,0 —.....„ 1 gi 1 viiiliii.4. IJ 6. ... ._. , "41'Ill 111,1 1116; 10 rallnillgliWaligi z---,,,,zz' < _. 4.11111r . Hi CO r-) N CC 1 1 N CY 03 t 1 0 CY I ! / I,>.< •G LI 1 1 C3 < [i 1 •,...z, i..la.'a i i^a,. = _I c-C 1.,_,... '. & —o 11J Of i. 0- I- S 9/ I I SLI 9A APPENDIX C 9 A .___ 1 , , , _ ., ,, , ,, , , • , .,,_,4.., r .1 , dr , ,i , : , , a, .43. , i 4 ( i 4 ''t ill i 1 1111 I iiii-'111Iii., i___ i ili / -- ll% I 4cl Eli iH !itg.: h , .A• 4ijfljij11` J fit s.�. 1`. [:__ ,. !I N i : t_p-1 1 if It :iga ati ;t2i- r fliii(10 Ili --- . ,i ; Ili ---Pii If( I 1 —7 *1,11 \ ','§.1T--L- r� ' it iliim-,1: .... \\s . iiiiiii 11 lit I, t��111 - _& ,..., � \ jIIIII'EI't ' 1 \k'' ` ' 4._,.. . • 1, 3 , i \ Ill t pit li — i -- * \\, ,[1:,,;___ ,1 ' \.‘. , di li II it;- 7— ...-"Y'- �``•;/ �� I �`\�\ jii IILI 'i II�Li 1.-.,+ ,1111 -- ;II ),'-/ \'') Ill I - !if li ' 11 , <,,, .1 111111 ii -iiii if lq" t i, t 11 att 11 a it t d ii ditcritiv iiitl 333 i r 1.1i! ii I. L4 . 1.1 7' 1111 f'1 ,1 i,1 -1 iti t Hi-- tit i -- ,-- ..,, l'i!ik li li ;_i ri riff' . 1q 1 1:. 1 ,1 t s `tit, Ili 1 B * IiiiiFzi2migkth F 1 1 A '0 6 �, el pi.,a y k i I i ng O N `O act , F Iii i ‘° -1 .Ill -; 4 •-.1,:!!' i ii jP a - o .. 9 A ilitiliii [wit, , (;- r, ,..i, i (it(--- _-:::::,,-Ft.:........,„_____...„ # 1, g — 4141 �1 . '1 I 1--,) Irr,, 1 iait 1,1 .. •? _; isle • st.••r—Oil ' 11. ,, ... .. -... -, . ti Nil _; I� } 1 I" Q Qom. ,\\ \ (r ' .1 -,.r, Z p 1 11,/ ( I \., 17 ilifilltg}I ,.. , / , r- ll3 iff li 3,,,...:-:::-,--,-.;.: ..,, -,42........,...-_.-....._.. i$ ^5 -._ CCif i I 11 1 i !f ' j -fir .'7 1E1 01 CI I i i 41/4) , . . 4 LID ! I ;' I� 11 I►1 �4 ,, ,--, „ !i Pi I 1 I fr i,,1 +,,f1 . ii II ' ' tfill ft ; i • iti[ V I 40.4-' I 'I 1 c�---i 11 F __ ---� — I Q9P,i,, ip� L— 12.1 li 1 . : ..-_-_-_w_a•-•.:=.:::- '"-•.., '`% —11 1:T.-7 i,e_ ,,,-::7 1 Rkk I i 24 i ' I g I 2 i 4 ly.111, Ivo,/ ) 34 g I ; lir ieli / 1 iff[iiii --r—' .,, II li. I -, i 1 _.___,1 1,,,, ,,a.. .a- /1 ' --\ 4 i IN 11 iiLlt lf, lir! I ..\,, 11 '311111 ' '''' '-',....J /12 ! Ill ./ li \l'i F a ; i11 ^` g11' —-i s 1 4,1 d 1 a `\ \, 1 1liii i if! Pi ii i ;.1 0 H * 11-3311 = z ?.(.. s1 ,,,:r4. E 2 Cj UUI fl �3 la El 00 lint ! c4 Ct. e • F . c 'tf Ii1fIiIuhE1UIll.E{ ql Ill 1 WTI c" n gi ii i 14 iti2 _, AH[111111[11 , p r, 4 1 ./ II zS .A /' x !S 4 o i I i ,1 I s • Li t `' r- ' l 1* 1 tt — e , 3 1 100 ifq fp 1 l' 1 IPI p i ! a yr " a I 1 UIUIEIIIIIEII ; it 1 .gr 1 - 0 w1i1iI lID 0 n llU 8 2 O D n p 82 co EJ gI aqii IP V 2 > 1 0 V - w 4.z .-* 'y! ?? ai @ 6D, a. a re4 Fij 1 a t., a rg. ”. a & � csin 11) iluflii a 0 0 A U(cr , I iil Pl. 2 g. g ....0t_ O S Q .D 3 QU Mitt 5 H 9A APPENDIX D 9 •APPENDIX D- Gateway Triangle Stormwater Master Plan - 2000 GATEWAY TRIANGLE CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Section 3..0 • Atternative No. 3A • Alternative No. 3A is a variation of Alternative No, 3 developed in 1998 for the Gateway Triangle Conceptual Stormwater Master Plan. Alternative No. 3A is based on the future land uses established in the new Bayshore and Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan. Alternative No. 3A also includes Projects that are currently under design to address existing problem areas. For areas undergoing complete redevelopment, permitting will require provision of an onsite stormwater management system to attenuate the 25-year, 3-day storm event. In addition, water quality improvements are required.The developer of the redevelopment areas will be required to construct a stormwater management system. Thus, improvements by the County are not required for the areas that will be completely redeveloped. Areas that are assumed to have new stormwater management system built as part of redevelopment are described below. ■ The area west of Commercial Drive defined by US-41 and Davis Boulevard is designated a moderate activity center which includes a hotel, restaurants, offices and other commercial uses. Complete redevelopment of this 14.8-acre area is assumed. The area bounded by Davis Boulevard, Commercial Drive, US-41 and the Linwood Outfall Ditch is designated office/warehouse, This 25-acre area could either undergo complete redevelopment or existing users may remain in upgraded facilities. Improvements for this area will be identified for the case of upgrading existing facilities instead of complete redevelopment. The Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan identified two potential stormwater pond sites in the redevelopment areas. The ponds are located at the westernmost point of the Gateway Triangle adjacent to US-41 and Davis Boulevard and between Linwood Avenue and Francis Avenue west of the Linwood Outfall Ditch. Actual stormwater pond locations will be determined during the design phase of the redevelopment. The Gateway Triangle east of the Linwood Outfall Ditch is projected to undergo restructured development. Restructured development does not include complete redevelopment. Thus, developers will not be required to provide comprehensive stormwater management systems. Redevelopment provides the opportunity to create detention areas and regrade the site to improve drainage conditions. Restructured development does not create open areas for stormwater detention nor does it allow for elevating structures. Restructured development limits stormwater • management improvements to providing detention in open areas and working within the existing topographical constraints. Stormwater management improvements in the restructured development areas will.be made to address existing drainage problem areas, The drainage problem areas in the restructured 1 development area are listed below, LR/..alti 629S 21166.RT,REP 3-1 9 A • • Gateway Triangle. Conceptual Stormwater Master Plan • • Technical Memorandum ■ Kirkwood Avenue—Only if the area does not undergo complete redevelopment. • • . Property fronting Davis Boulevard north of Wild Pines Apartments.- • ■ The Linwood Outfall Ditch, especially property on Manorca Drive adjacent to the ditch. ▪ Pelton Avenue at the intersection with US-41. In addition to the improvements recorivnended to address problem areas, additional maintenance and rehabilitation of the existing stormwater management system' is recommended for the restructured development area. Additional maintenance will restore the hydraulic capacity of the stormwater management system. Additional hydraulic capacity will decrease the duration 9f • flooding since the water can be conveyed more quickly.through the system. Rehabilitation only will not significantly decrease the frequency of flooding, except perhaps in cases where flooding is minor and caused by a clogged catch basin, pipe or swale. Additional maintenance and • rehabilitation will allow the existing system to operate at its maximum capacity, which will provide'the highest level of service for the existing system. The specific maintenance activities are provided below. • 1, Regrade swales every two years — 36,000.feet per year including the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 31,500 feet per year excluding the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch. 2. NOW and clean swales once per month—36,000 feet per year including the area between I. Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 31,500 feet per year excluding the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch. • Clean pipes and catch basins one additional time per year—75 catch basins including the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch; 55 catch basins excluding the area between Commercial Drive and the Linwood Outfall Ditch. The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Study includes identification of one site for stormwater retention within the Shadowlawn Neighborhood Focus Initiative. This site is the ' property recently acquired by the County for use as a stormwater detention site. The project has been named Pond 2A. • A piping network will convey the runoff.to Pond 2A, an approximate 2.5-acre proposed stormwater detention pond located adjacent to the Linwood Outfall Ditch.'Discharge from the pond will be through an overflow structure into the Linwood Outfall Ditch. During low flow • conditions stormwater will be routed to the detention pond. Piping is provided for higher flow • conditions to discharge into the storm sewer on Commercial Drive. The County has purchased the detention pond site and the project is under design. This project includes 13 catch basins, 1950 linear feet(lt)of 24"RCP and 450 If of 18"RCP. The project includes construction of the Pond 2A detention pond and improvements to the Linwood Outfall Ditch. • Kirkwood Avenue west of Avondale Drive is a major problem drainage area. A stormwater • management system including additional catch basins and piping connected to a detention pond are recommended to improve drainage conditions in this area.Nine catch basins are proposed to collect runoff. Storm drains'will include approximately 1100 If of 15" RCP, 450 If of 18" RCP and 350 if of 24" RCP. These quantities do not include catch basins and•storm sewers that are •4..:. included in the Kirkwood Extension project. • •GKI WORK/61,04i 166-R1'•REP 3-2 • 9 A • Gateway Triangle • Conceptual Storm water Master Plan Technical Memorandum Parcels that front on Davis Boulevard north of Wild Pines Apartments have drainage problems, especially at Naples Rent-All. The northern half of the parcels drain to Davis Boulevard while the southern half originally drained to the Linwood Outfall Ditch via overland flow. The Wild Pines Apartments were constructed with a perimeter berm. This berm impedes the southerly overland flow from the parcels fronting on Davis Boulevard. An extension of the catch basin and storm sewer system on Kirkwood Avenue. is recommended to address this problem area. The Kirkwood Extension project will require 5 catch basins, 4 manholes, 125 If of 15"RCP, 166 If of 18" RCP and 411 if of 24" RCP, Drainage easements are required for this project, This project has been designed and should be bid by May 2000. Pelton Avenue is another drainage problem area, specifically near the intersection of US-4I. A system of catch basins and pipes is recommended to address problems in the area by diverting a significant part of the basin drainage away from the Pelton Street/LUS-41 intersection into an existing drainage ditch that connects to the US-41 system. This project requires 12 catch basins and approximately 1500 feet of piping ranging in diameter from 15" to 24". Improvements may be needed in the existing drainage ditch. Drainage problems are reported along the Linwood Outfall Ditch. A particular problem area is a low-,lying home on the west end of Manorca Drive. 4 Improvements to address this problem include expanding the Linwood Outfall Ditch. Widening of the ditch will provide greater storage volume. In addition, berming the ditch may help alleviate flooding on Manorca Drive. Figure 2 shows the proposed improvements. Table I provides a conceptual capital cost estimate. Table 2 provides a conceptual O&M cost estimate. • • • • • • • • • LK/WOAK/61,95.111166-RtRLP 3-3 9 A • . I • • • • ; TABLE 1 • • ALTERNATIVE NO.3A • CONCEPTUAL CAPITAL COST ESTIMATEt • Estimated) Estimated3 • Project Construction • Project Cost($) Cost(S) Detention Pond 2A and Piping 410,300 535,000 Kirkwood Avenue 144,400 190,000 (West of Avondale) • Kirkwood Avenue Extension 78,0004 89,8005 Felton Avenue 122,700 160,000 • 4 Linwood Outfall Ditch • 49,800 65,000 • TOTAL 805,200 1,039,800 Notes: ' Property costs are pot included. 2 Itemized construction cost estlmate is provided in the appendix. 3 Estimated project costs includes 15%contingency, 12%engineering and 3%admin. 4 Detailed construction cost estimate based on design drawings is included in appendix. 5 Estimated project cost includes estimated construction cost and actual engineering cost. • • • 3-4 • • • 9 A • TABLE 2 • ALTERNATIVE NO.3A CONCEPTDAL O&M COST ESTIMATE • • • - Gateway Triangle Gateway Triangle" •East of Commercial Drive East of Linwood Cost($) Outfall Ditch Cost(S) • Regrade Swales ' First two years • . 84,000 73,500 • Subsequent years 21,000 18,500 Mow& Clean Swales [8,000 15,500 Clean Pipes&Catch Basins' 17,000 12,500 TOTAL ANNUAL COST — First two years 119,000 101,500 Subsequent years 56,000 46;500 • • • • • • • • • I • LK/WORK/62041166-MEP 3„5 • , •• i • • 9 A • (• • :• .•• • • � i APPENDIX D 9 A Table 1 Detailed Cost Estimate-Alternative 3A • Rounded Unit Construction Project Project Description Quantity Units Cost($) Cost($) Cost($) Cost($) Kirkwood Ave. (West of Avondale) 24" RCP 350 If 90 31,500 18"RCP 450 if 75 33,750 • 15" RCP 1100 If 65 71,500 Manholes 0 ea 2000 0 Catch Basins 9 ea 850 7,650 Subtotal 144,400 187,720 190,000 Kfrlcwood Ave. Extension 78,000' Pelton Ave. • 24" RCP 400 If 90 36,000 ' 18"RCP 500 If 75 37,500 15" RCP 600 If 65 39,000 Catch Basins 12 ea 850 10,200 Subtotal 122,700 159,510 160,000 Linwood Outfall Ditch *- Excavation 4150 cy 12 49,800 64,740 65,000 Detention Pond 2A and Piping 24" RCP ' 1950 If 90 175,500 18"RCP 450 If 75 33,750 Manholes 1 ea 2000 2,00D Catch Basins 13 ea . 850 11,050 Excavation-Pond 13,000 cy 12 156,000 Excavation-Ditch 2,500 cy 12 30,000 Discharge Structure 1 ea 2000 2,000 Subtotal 410,300 533,390 535,0,00 GRAND TOTAL 950,000 * Refer to project cost estimate '* Based on 650 ft ditch excavated 5 ft deep with 35 ft width 9A . . . . . . . _ . . . .. Kirkwood Avenue Extension . Drainage Improvement Project ' Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Unit Item Unit Price Quantity ' Cost • Standard Manhole,Type P-8 ea 1960 4 7840 Catch Basins • Index 233 (Type G) ea 3400 . 4 13800 Index 232 (Type D) ea 1725 2 3450 15"RCP If 37.5 128 4800 • 18"RCP If 46 166 7470 24"RCP If 60 411 24660 24"Snout ea 300 6 1800 Concrete Cradle ea 200 3 600 Roadway Restoration asphalt sy 5 327 1635 Limerock base course sy 6.5 327 2126 ` Asphalt Overlay • sy 3 . 654 1962 Sodding sy 1.25 .250. 313 Seeding sf 0.12 820 98 Connection to existing pipe ea 200 1 200 Mobil., Demob., Bonds, etc. Is 3700 1 3700 Subtotal 74253 Contingency g 5% TOTAL 3713 • •1 77966 • • I . 9 A . .• . . . . . . ‘ _.........._......____ . , , ...,,,.....,,iiri .( �� 0 off ' x cuo. W�Z 'n S n`I t�.t t o 3' VjU u 67 �I.'� Q1 ' Y j6p. U �( �' S d Q O WW4. O zee. pO U 4 a N . „2; • J . • III L f1 r , o 0 a U 1 ER AIwTi r- - � lI 1 o :n : �' N / i/- te--r- - .a rk �NnuNk1„ Hr �0. Iri • . u, L 6„..+>.,t49 ONlp 9 oz:oz:ot uo/ez/co 160 \l110d36\aoc\99 iaz\sots\n 9A APPENDIX E 9 A . . . , • • . . . . • _ • • • .,.... . : 4 4 el. -IA, R - 0 !A 1 . ; Pi 21 g. $!Igi : : ! - • . ' ! : ' 1 I • i plOig6ThglalC991 “1 -i • N • g iii 24 Fl Fi "1. :2 :21 " ~ st: . F.', 6 zi. 83 Al •• ' d F'l 1 , • i • LiJ ! . 11KAM § 1 §10 §:glirr , . . • . 1 ' • , I D : is Ulfikpil ! MN01 § tl. a . . 4 ill's' '''' .-" "' -- , e1 4 ,-. A 8. • , • • i , • : 1 . < ' > 1 IF-- V °' "I §J §i §, c1 §ilOc'HE:101 § : E . : U & ' M 1 ' § 1 • Z Lli . ig §10 §, c4. §, §. §XORRil a. , dig ,,, - ,4 ,6 - 6 d. 46, ... g ., . • . , : , 0 —1 > , I d - - - . . - ", " - A. 9. LI ' . : ' • w 1 , 0 " 11. 1RWe §10§ 4EARN ' in • fkiligGikq MIEF,AVU . . . . . s . ; i • iTi D . IMR011iiklfi. M. ' ' i ; a . ' 1 [-- D ' ' IRIMR MAIIM 1 1 L.L.0 HI Lii Hii A-- \ < ' V ' I i • T 2 : , P--- cn . 111H ' '1 I 1 . I 1 I < 1 •. i. : !"I: I I f 1, 2' 4:',1 w1 .4:.9! !i8.:.1 "rn8. ••l iit°, :1 15,t : 1 I . i i - • ' I I I h 0 , , I A . : ! • ii lc .121 • a, ' 1 il : : ; : 4 . . 11 RIt ' 0 iliiiiillill 11 i i .i . 1 4 u) . . el: Al 1 - 1R5 I ca . lAtiAgOi, il i a . 1 la • g . ...g u, Lu ill 31H111141111 1 : 1 . 1 ill I ' 1.11 I I I ! I 11 . l'i 1 Iii ' 10iii ' 111 li -1 4111 g : li Oil . - 41 . . c ' r! .. . m ) : 1 ..;_. : T1111 . 1111i1 -J it " " / )1A 1 MI . - i, WI . ig I . . . . . . .... ,...' ,„4., " .., . ....!.E1A .... . . . . U . . • . . • . . . . . ______. .....— . . . . . . • • 9 A • • . . • . ..__ . r,, , iq cg.'; . . • cil NA i N,- oT-T1 i ''', -j—h. : i N 0 t1.1J ,q F i g , • • i • kl ii .9 N 41 g 0. p).1,0 ..---1Ti gi zs-i, H, mr9 4 . " . , ; ' ' • ; . ; I , , i ' • ,, . ; - ...--;--7-; "r , , Es E/ ca. 71 4 -1 'r„ P q '4'.. 7;711,3.1 i ' •I . ' 1 — ,,, _ .1 , . . , - g3 8 `.. - -I N. N, r- 4 6g ,.9.1 • 1 1. • ' 1 : 1 i i i : ; . ; 4 • I I ; Vgi - §, c'l 9 z,•'1-',1 . . , ! ; I . : • • : •ie0 -Is, gt84UVIg , 1 . • ip. §. .,73ii .il ir- gNy- Rp., Ovi 1 ,i I 1 i 1 . — H l • F'I ts - ''''-', .N - 'w gS411Et, N1 §1 ' 1 . : 1 i - , ' ; • • .4.-1 ' 1 li F :4-,1 g,i °I X1 Fil;11 ‘Nii E•1 § F.] t.. 611—, , . . . ' • I sil;-• - --, N '-' n •"" -igl 93 ;i z. .. . . . . ! , • . ---4-----R ! 1 . egge, ?$ •;t: ; - - - 1 4• 1R ,..a N 1 e g cr• r.,./ 7: ^— , " ^ Si g ;-•• 0 t*.. S3 - , • — _,_.__ • 14 nN.g111§1, ?_3v0a -., E. • I , • I . . i Kri gXal. ,IX(§ g' § V2 '• g • . I . : i-- ' . EY & §. .? `::': 201RI., 1 1, kL., 1 ' usF: F: 1 K r, -4 f - g,) M .:?, ' INn • • i. • ! -7- ', 1 ... 0 . • ' . ., .. ; . 1 . -- ,__ _ ' 111 i': r'l 1 ii :-' Ili & ''' il ifl I . : , 1 p., r- 4 43 ' W i--, II 4.ri , • i.... _i_ _ _,_ . . 1 •. _, , 1 • ' . —1-1 _ • in• z . i 7 F . . • 11.1 , : 1 . 1 /: 1 1 6 • , . ' CL. .: li . 11 . < . — '' .' '1 1 *--.. :1 • • • I 1 ) ' 8 g . _Z , 1 , ; _I. •1 — ai),._L- — — III liggRigi4g1 ,‘ il- 4 gLuu . . . _______ ___L_ , ! , FAIN 1 P I, E i-1 il 1 1 mil 1 I . I *.. i J t I _,_ . . • . , . ____ . •. . . . . . . 9 A 1 . . . • . • • . 1 . . , . ., :„... . • 1 . . _.,.. . . . • .1 . . , . 1 • loll II ! 311 ) ' 1 i . . a: li -ii1111 ' f 4 Itil A . iiithd . . . • pl. g. N1 §.1R059Rloir144". . . • - -; sv G ; ' glEJEI I , . I •1 .�• ; • mp•' vl i 1 I ' • ' 1 1 1 1 ( i j 9 ry �,. • i I i I 4 p 11 b �. I[VS i , 1 i '�m yp� g �p�pQ • 1 ( I I w . . e rs2n n lr "sic« al m g ^J Ei fd g k a , , j I ! . x j a , 1 ! 11 ,4 ° M141 .414 I a a.a c'4t § § .fit . I , Y a 1 9 9A APPENDIX F 9 A I T48S I T47S I T48S [ T49S I T5OS i T618 I T525 I T 538 --"I — — iA 'AliAliAgii0fip i .4,2§; 471L1.1 ,ougge,ggqgLg8a 1 1 I i I ! 1 8 f (ti i 11 ; 1111111 1 1 11 / 1 11111 al 1 I p. . 1 / 11j15'd I I h 1 - •I'i I 1 '' 11111111 i 1 i i 1 ii i .4, 1 i i i 1 ., q _ 1 I I '."1 ? i > , , R IS ,- i u i I i 4 . 1 8 4 r" r 1 L. cilloringiLl '' ILI I'LJ 'Elit113111n1 I 0 i i i i i i i 9§g§gol'i'l l'iigiliqgri:1-19'ii'f'1.4.1- . 1 i i rri ri ce I I — 1 I 13 il 1 11 w i 11 i I III 111111 1 1 11 II I I 2 113g-1 i /ti itl.11 Pi '1111 11 •._ 1 $1 1 lo 6 111H111.11111 IIIE i I' 1 ...._ _ ....... ,i II il I i ill . I iil 1 1 1 di I 1 1 Ilillii g i m I I I I i611 01 11/1 P ] 1;I 1111 i 1 1 7 ilillil g ./ i — I I i 11111,11111iIi3i1111111/ 1 i 1111 — ill1 ;g111 Ai 0 01 I!ii II I I ) Ilin . loomm112111111114111111 illillii _ , \Li, _.... . c, I , 1 / IIIz 1 . - ,,,-- ____ _ i ' . , 1 oivft 4.......... .p , i3 11.1 ii , a*/ VI g u, W P, v 1 09 cc '.. I — _ 1 1 1 , i MI 'r 11 Mill' , NI ,, , . \ ..x,7,, `,. . _- illiMiLai; . _ / 1 \, '.1. I.,' '',J, 1 .... h,i / 1 ,:•:•:•:-:.-4.) . ,‘ ,1 ,.,,,, 1.-1- ,t 6,, . w i , / < 1 1 illall 10111 ----1 gla Ll _ fx .,; m c4 '. I fi", 7.,:,1;: ::::K ' „, . 8 g ' 1 1 1 in ; '' ' 1 I - ui cjiqi Ailts r" r, 1 k'Z''' [ '0' ::: '' ' ( ,,, ' LL lob imolai /./41 ,q,;,,,,, 4 ,.,„.._.„ , . w 0 x ...jinn, via . 1 _ c•I w I,- ,q§, E ' pribigriPlikirilttll / '," CL 8 1-1,.... Z ,11111 r-1'lir e,zi,,,,,r, .. ,,,,,-;••• ,,, i6 0 r' i IP w LU D 0E-1 A in ' i For ' '-' .4,-'04•Sk,it`v",--- tl q' ,R,'4 F— _16 - ce M P6 a_ 9 • r it —,:—71-, 0.7571it 't t c G u I f of i I T46S I 1475 I T4BS I T49S I T6OS I 1818 I 762S I T63S COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT Collier County Board of County Commissioners Workshop April 23, 2019 CAO OPINION 1 At the 4/9 BCC meeting, the Board asked if the Immokalee CRA could be extended without extending the life of the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA. On 4/12, the CAO issued an opinion that stated the following: •Once established a CRA continues until terminated by the local government that created it. •In order to finance redevelopment projects using TIF, the CRA must establish a Redevelopment plan, which can be amended any time the Board sees fit. •When amended, the TIF can be extended for up to 30 years (or any other period of time), but can exist no more than 60 years in aggregate. •Barring outside financing obligations, the Board can cease to use TIF for projects at anytime in the Bayshore CRA, while continuing to do so in Immokalee. •If the Board chooses a different duration in TIF for Bayshore, the redevelopment plan update may need to be amended. CRA EXTENSION OPTIONS •Original CRA Redevelopment Plan was approved in 2000 to expend TIF for 30 years –approximately 11 years remain. •Today, the Board needs to provide direction on duration of the TIF for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA and has 3 options: •OPTION 1:Approve the Bayshore plan update and extend the TIF duration for 30 years. •OPTION 2:Approve the Bayshore plan update, but direct staff to amend the project list for another duration of TIF project financing. •OPTION 3:Reject the Bayshore plan update, and continue with the contents of the 2000 plan. •Staff is seeking direction from the Board on TIF duration prior to undertaking the FY20 Immokalee Redevelopment Plan update. 2 TIF REVENUE PROJECTIONS 3 •Initial TIF funding occurred FY01 –through 2019: •Bayshore: $22,631,017 •Immokalee: $8,659,135 •Est. TIF remaining in 11 year current term: •Bayshore: $36,007,237 •Immokalee: $10,410,043 •Est. TIF if extended for the proposed 30 year term (2019-2049): •Bayshore: $154,400,000 -$183,600,000 •Immokalee: $46,200,000 -$54,400,000 $8,659,135 $22,631,017 $46,200,000 $154,400,000 Immokalee Bayshore TIF Revenue 2000-2019 2019-2049 (est.) TOPIC: CRA OFFICE SPACE 4 •March 12 –CRAB terminated proposed leased space at Pineland Ave – directed staff to look into options on Gov Center campus •Several commercial properties are available to meet the needs of BGTCRA •Staff working with Facilities to identify possibilities for on-campus move, limited space currently available •BGTCRA Advisory Board made motion at 4/9 meeting to support locating the CRA offices off of Government Center campus •Long-term plan is to try and locate office space on County-owned 17 Acre site when future direction is decided TOPIC: 17 ACRES 5 •Zoned as the Cultural Arts Village at Bayshore •June 2018: termination of negotiations with Arno, Inc. –BCC directed CRA to wait until Redevelopment Plan Update to further consider option •Community survey conducted Aug/Sep 2018 •Multiple parties still interested in development -Seeking BCC direction on moving forward 17-ACRE SURVEY RESULTS 6 •Cultural arts center and park connections important •Focus on performance arts, theater, gallery 17-ACRE SURVEY RESULTS 7 •Achieving vision important •Interest in TIF, Impact fee, and land donation incentives 17-ACRE CONCEPT 8 •Park connectivity •Pathways •Shared space/use •CRA boundary expansion •Arts: performance, theater, gallery •Non-residential/mixed-use focus •Parking: on-street and garage option •Complete Streets/trail site connectivity •Incentives: •TIF •Impact fee deferment/buy-down •Land donation TOPIC: 17-ACRES 9 •F.S. 163, Section III outlines ways to dispose of CRA-owned land •CRA Advisory Board recommends reserving the property for a performing arts center with CAPA and dedicating remainder to green space •Staff has had discussions with Parks Department on combination of options to purchase/improve land -idea needs refinement •FGCU has a proposal for a research center combined with private development •Multiple private companies would be interested in proposal