Loading...
CCPC Agenda 04/18/2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 4/10/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 April 18, 2019 9: 00 AM Mark Strain - Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice-Chair Edwin Fryer - Secretary Patrick Dearborn Karl Fry Stan Chrzanowski, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. April 2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 4/10/2019 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes A. March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised 1. ***This item is being continued from the April 4, 2019 CCPC meeting.*** PUDR PL20180002020: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2009-21, as amended, the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples Residential Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 10± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD; by amending the PUD document to revise a Development Standard Table footnote relating to setbacks; to increase the minimum required preserve area for the PUD; to update the Master Plan to label the additional PUD acreage as a Residential/Golf tract and show additional preserve area on that tract; to revise the PUD legal description; to add a deviation relating to environment; to modify development commitments relating to planning and environment; and by providing an effective date. The property to be added to the PUD is located just west of Collier Boulevard, approximately two-thirds of a mile north of Immokalee Road, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, with the entire PUD consisting of 1,668.3± acres. [Coordinator: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] April 2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 4/10/2019 2. PL20170000768: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as the Baumgarten MPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 400 multifamily and/or townhouse residential dwelling units and up to 140 hotel/motel rooms and up to 370,000 square feet of commercial land uses at the southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard, in Section 26, Township 48, Range 26, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 55.66+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner, AICP, PLA] B. Noticed 10. New Business 11. Old Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn 04/18/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 5.A Item Summary: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes Meeting Date: 04/18/2019 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst – Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Name: Judy Puig 04/10/2019 9:09 AM Submitted by: Title: Dept Head - Growth Management – Growth Management Department Name: Thaddeus Cohen 04/10/2019 9:09 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 04/10/2019 9:09 AM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 04/18/2019 9:00 AM 5.A Packet Pg. 4 March 21, 2019 Page 1 of 52 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida, March 21, 2019 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Mark Strain Karl Fry Edwin Fryer Karen Homiak Joe Schmitt ABSENT: Stan Chrzanowski Patrick Dearborn ALSO PRESENT: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Manager Jeffrey Klatzkow, County Attorney Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney Tom Eastman, School District Representative 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 2 of 52 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. BOSI: Chair, you have a live mike. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thanks, Mike. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to the March 21st meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. If everybody will please rise for Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Will the secretary please do the roll call. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Eastman? MR. EASTMAN: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Chrzanowski? (No response.) COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Fry? COMMISSIONER FRY: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'm here. Chairman Strain? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Vice Chair Homiak? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Schmitt? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Here. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mr. Dearborn? (No response.) COMMISSIONER FRYER: Chair, we have a quorum of five. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Stan and Patrick have notified me they had other engagements they had to go to, so they're excused absences today. And for today's meeting, I scheduled other things to happen this morning, so I'll be leaving at break. I didn't expect this to take too long. So whether we're through it or not, I still have those other commitments now. So I will leave at breaktime. Which takes us to the addenda to the agenda. Are there any changes? And, staff, we've got two items. One's going to be continued when we get to it. MR. BOSI: No other changes, Chair. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Planning Commission absences; our next meeting is April 4th. Does anybody know if they're not going to make it to that meeting? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Then I'm the only one. I will not be here. MR. SCHMITT: I will not be here. I've got to go to Texas that week. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I'll be on vacation that week, so Karen will be running the meeting on April 4th. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm going on the 4th. Uh-oh, Bosi's going to stack the deck. I can see him now. MR. BOSI: Yeah, we have two petitions. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. I usually don't announce until I'm sure the decks can't be stacked, and there's only two relatively minor petitions. MR. BOSI: Yeah. The 10-year water supply. It's the adoption. You've already heard it once at transmittal. And then the Esplanade PUD amendment; relatively minor. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. Okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Chairman, excuse me. Before we get into our agenda item, I wanted to 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 3 of 52 make -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was on approval of minutes. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'm sorry. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Go ahead. You were thinking -- did you want us to bring up something now or before we get into that agenda item? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Just before we get into the agenda. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Let's go through the rest of the agenda first then. Approval of minutes. We were electronically distributed February 21st, 2019, minutes. Any changes, or is there a recommendation of approval? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Move approval. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Made by Ned. Seconded by? COMMISSIONER FRY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Karl. All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 5-0. That takes us to the BCC report and recaps and, Mike, I think you mentioned there isn't any. MR. BOSI: There was no land-use items on the 12th agenda. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And Item 7 is chairman's report. I've got something new necessarily to talk about today. 8 is consent agenda. We have no consent items. The first public hearing is a request to continue. Is it this item you want to talk about, Ned, or the next one? COMMISSIONER FRYER: No, sir. It's really neither one. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, then, what did you want to mention? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. On Monday the City Council at the City of Naples unanimously voted to authorize the city's Planning Advisory Board to reach out to us and propose a joint workshop. And I know that Mike has been contacted by his counterpart, Robin Singer, within the city, and that the matter has to go to our BCC, of course, but I wanted to let this commission know that that's in process. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does anybody want to know this board's position on it, or is that just something the city's deciding to go forward with and -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, the city has asked for such a meeting. I think it would be entirely proper for us to weigh in. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, then at some point we ought to add it to a discussion under new business for that possibility, but definitely not until after the Board of County Commissioners even wants to have that a consideration, since they operate under a completely different code than we do. I'd sure want to understand the parameters, and I'd like to see the Board of County Commissioners know what the agenda's about before we go into things that are political and not related to this board. Tom? MR. EASTMAN: Yeah. That was my question, to know if there was any particular issues that they wanted to discuss at the joint meeting and they gave any indication of reasons for having the joint meeting -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: I can tell you what I -- MR. EASTMAN: -- specifically. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I can tell you what I know; that the Planning Advisory Board has, for a long time, wanted to become more involved in the subject of the planning. About 90 percent of their work is rezone work. And they're aware that we do much more along the lines of planning, and I think they would like to learn 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 4 of 52 more about how we do what we do and how we approach the subject, and I also know specifically that they would like to have perhaps, well -- a presentation from our chairman, perhaps an abbreviated one. I think your regular one goes about an hour. But they are aware -- they've seen your You Tube presentation and would welcome an opportunity to hear from you on general subjects of planning. The other point that I think is of interest to them is that, as it happens, the so-called "D" downtown redevelopment district of the City of Naples almost butts up directly to our Gateway Triangle redevelopment district. And so there's a question whether there could be some positive outcomes from collaboration as we continue to plan for what is to happen in that area. That's about all I know about it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I did see an email that I forwarded to Mike, and it was copied to me by somebody. And I suggested that we not go there until the Board acknowledges that's where they want us to go. I'm real concerned about political agendas that are outside the purview of this panel, and I don't want to get into that on a joint meeting in any possibility whatsoever. So from that perspective I'm concerned. And I do appreciate the other panel wanting to talk with us but, again, I want to make sure the elected officials are comfortable with that before we go there. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Of course. I think there's a sense on the part, certainly, the leadership of the City of Naples that it would behoove all of us, both the city and the county, to cooperate and collaborate more; that there would be positive outcomes for each jurisdiction in doing that. And I think this was a first step -- or seen by them as a first step of having greater collaboration. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Was there any thought that just the two boards ought to meet together? COMMISSIONER FRYER: They did last year. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. I mean, they're the ones that set the policies, standards, and endorsements that the rest of us have to follow. We certainly can't do that. And I've always looked for the direction from the Board to move forward with what this panel does. And I was a little dismayed that it started without the two boards talking about it first before it even got down to our level, but we'll have to see where that goes when our board discusses it, so... COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, all I'm doing is reporting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's fine. Anybody else? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: My only comment is before such a meeting take place, there's clearly defined goals and objectives, and those goals and objectives would have to be approved by the Board. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would agree with you. And we also ought to look at scheduling it right now. We're going into our off season, and everybody in a couple weeks is going to be leaving town. For those people that are interested in the kind of subjects that would be brought up, we might want to consider a time when they're here. Maybe after September, in the fall, but that's something we can talk about in scheduling. ***So with that, we'll move on to our first advertised public hearing, and this is a request for a continuance. It's 9A1. It's Item PL20180002552, and it's a 10-year water supply that they're requesting a continuance to April 4th. Is there a motion to approve that continuance? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Make a motion to approve. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Made by Joe, seconded by Karen. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 5 of 52 (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 5-0. ***The next item and the only item remaining on the agenda is Item 9A2. It's the amendment to the Collier County Redevelopment Plan. This item is actually a review of the visioning statement that was just recently completed or drafted for the Immokalee CRA -- the entire CRA, which does include Immokalee and Bayshore, although most of it pertains to Bayshore. So with that in mind, I'd like to ask our staff to give us some kind of guidance as to what this document does or does not do and what we're really here to be looking at today in relationship to this document. MR. WEEKS: Good morning, Commissioners. David Weeks of the Comprehensive Planning staff. Deborah Forester, the director of the CRA, will be, as I understand it, making the presentation this morning, and she can walk through the statutory provisions within Chapter 163.360 of Florida Statutes, and I believe it's her intent to walk through it step by step. That statutory provision identifies what a redevelopment plan is, what it is to include, what it is to address. The point I wanted to make right up front to the Planning Commission is that a redevelopment plan is not a regulatory document. Most of the actions that this body are involved in pertains to land development petitions, whether it's a rezone petition, a variance, Comprehensive Plan amendment, Land Development Code amendments. All of those are regulatory in nature. A redevelopment plan is not. And it may provide the support information that would -- that would support an amendment to our Comprehensive Plan and/or Land Development Code, but in and of itself, a redevelopment plan is not a regulatory document. I just wanted to stress that point. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And then just to clarify, then, so the language we're seeing here broken down in like a policy format, like 5.3.1 or something like that, that is not the language that necessarily is going to find its way into the GMP. MR. WEEKS: Not necessarily. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And at the time the language gets into a codified situation for the GMP and then subsequent to the -- subsequently to the LDC, we will see that language in the normal routine process that we do to review such language? MR. WEEKS: Correct, as part of an advertised public hearing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So this language we're seeing today is not binding? MR. WEEKS: Correct. Now, one -- the very first item under Chapter 163.360(2), I think it is, is that the redevelopment plan must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan, and that would be -- to me that seems to be the most specific point for the Planning Commission to address. Again, as Deborah walks through, you may have other comments or questions about the statutory provisions, but that's the very first one, and that's the one that is paramount, and that's the one that this body is used to dealing with in looking at plan amendments and all sorts of zoning and other Land Development Code petitions. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you review this plan, David? MR. WEEKS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What's your official title? MR. WEEKS: Growth Management manager. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And how long have you been doing that? MR. WEEKS: Under that -- under various title -- I've been here about 33-and-a-half years, about 25 or so of that -- 28 of that has been in Comprehensive Planning. So I've been involved in Comprehensive Plan reviews of both amendments and petitions for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan for about 28 years. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Were you involved in the Comprehensive Plan changes that resulted in the original 2000 visioning statements that the CRA started with? MR. WEEKS: I had some peripheral involvement in the redevelopment plan itself. I was directly involved in the amendment to establish the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle overlay, and I had some involvement in the Immokalee Master Plan back in 1991 as well. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 6 of 52 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I noticed the staff report. So just not to be too redundant, but you and, I'm assuming, Mr. Bosi reviewed this; you both signed it. So that means you find it consistent with your history and experience and expertise with the Growth Management Plan? MR. WEEKS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else have any questions of David? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Who's making the presentation on the part of this plan then? MR. BOSI: I believe the CRA executive director, Ms. Deborah Forester. MS. FORESTER: Good morning. For the record, Deborah Forester, Community Redevelopment Agency director. Thank you for giving us the opportunity today to present to you this amendment to the Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan. As David mentioned, I wanted to just walk through a little bit of what the statute requires. So we are under Chapter 163, Part III, which is the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, and it has been amended, of course, over the course of the last 30, 40 years. But the CRA's intent is to address blight, and blight is defined in that chapter, and it regards a number of factors, and those factors can include inadequate infrastructure, such as sewer and water capacity, lack of sidewalks. It can also talk about lot sizes that are not appropriate to the current standards today. So what we are required to do under the statute is to create a finding of necessity. So back in 1999/2000, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to look at the CRA statute and to see if our two areas qualified for the finding of necessity. The statute also provides guidance on what has to be included in the redevelopment plan, and it also provides authority for a Community Redevelopment Agency. It also identifies what the duration of a CRA can be. And, currently, under the current statute, our CRA, because it was established prior to 2002, could remain in existence for up to 60 years, and that purpose is to use a mechanism called tax-increment financing that some of you may be aware of, and that helps to fund the projects that are identified in the redevelopment plan. So let's talk a little bit about Collier County's Community Redevelopment Agency. Because we're not a charter county we can only have one agency, but we can have several component areas. So back in 2000 the Board adopted by resolution the "Finding of Necessity Report" which is included as an appendix in this amendment. It also created the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency which, by statute, is a separate legal entity, but the Board of County Commissioners sits as the governing board. It also established local advisory boards so that they could make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners sitting as the CRA on how to proceed with implementation of the redevelopment plan. And today I have several members from our advisory committee in the Bayshore/Gateway area. I want to thank them for coming today and also for their involvement over the past year on looking at the amendment, providing input and direction to staff and our consultant. And then, again, we adopted by resolution the redevelopment plan back in 2000. And we have Section 4 which deals with the Immokalee redevelopment area, and Section 5 which deals with the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle redevelopment area. Back in 2000 this plan was presented to the Planning Commission. You-all at that time found it consistent with the Growth Management Plan. And at that time, according to statute, it could have a duration of 30 years. You can allow for an additional duration if you do an amendment to that plan or a modification to that plan. So just briefly how TIF works, back in 2000 the Board also adopted an ordinance, Ordinance 2000-42, which established the trust fund. And at that time the trust fund established our base tax value. So that was geared on the tax value back in 2000 for Immokalee and for the Bayshore/Gateway CRA. Every year that incremental increase from that base value gets put into a trust fund. We have two separate accounts. Immokalee has their funds, and the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle has their funds. And this chart just shows you the increase in tax increment that's been received over the past 18 years. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 7 of 52 So what can tax-increment funds be used for? One, they have to be identified in the plan and, two, they can be both capital and noncapital. So for capital, of course, we have the infrastructure. We can do beautification landscaping; we can also do public amenities and facilities. Noncapital, we can pay for staff, administrative costs. We can do plans and studies to get to the point that we're actually doing infrastructure improvements, and we can also provide grants to both residential and commercial property owners within the CRA, again, to eliminate blighted conditions. So today we're here to talk about the amendment to the overall Collier County redevelopment plan. The proposed changes, Section 1 are basically cleanup because we have not done an amendment to this plan since 2000. We also recognize that the Immokalee boundary expansion that occurred in 2004, those maps were not updated into the redevelopment plans. We're taking this opportunity to include that boundary expansion map in an updated Future Land Use Map for the Immokalee area. And we're also suggesting that the duration of the CRA be extended to another 30 years, which currently is allowed under statute. Section 4 which is briefly, again, just updating the Immokalee redevelopment area plan with maps, and then we did some figures and the appendices were updated to provide a historic overview of what's occurred over the last 18 years. So the bulk of our plan amendment is in Section 5. We are actually requesting that we replace the entire section with a new section that focuses on the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle redevelopment. And with that, I'd like to introduce Evan Johnson, who is with Tindale Oliver, who has been working with us over the last year to provide you an overview of the updated plan. MR. JOHNSON: Good morning, everyone. As Deborah mentioned, my name is Evan Johnson. I'm with Tindale Oliver in Tampa. And I'm going to walk you through the work we've been doing on the update to Section 5 of the county's redevelopment plan specific to the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle. So I think it's important to -- as Deborah mentioned, you-all had approved the 2000 -- the original redevelopment plan back in 2000 and found that consistent with the Growth Management Plan. So what I wanted to do was walk you through some of the -- what that plan did back in 2000 and maybe what our plan is doing in comparison to that, what we've done to refresh, since this is an entire removal and replace. So the 2000 redevelopment plan had a series of catalyst projects that it identified. It included finding ways to encourage and incentivize hotel/restaurant/office in the Triangle area as well as the flex office warehouse, looked at doing the town center, a town center concept of the Gulf Gate Plaza, as well as creating an entertainment center near the intersection of Bayshore and Haldeman Creek. It also had something called neighborhood focus initiatives, which were very much more clean and safe, small-scale residential interventions to make sure that, you know, you're improving some of the neighbor level assets as well. Other items that it identified, stormwater master plan for the Triangle, the Haldeman Creek dredging plan, making sure that it got dredged periodically, roadway improvements, as well as potentially Botanical Garden support. As you may know, the Botanical Gardens relocated since this plan was adopted, still in the CRA, but had moved, and that was part of the vision back in the 2000 plan. It also talked about urban design and what should be done in the focus that -- in the future with the urban design zoning elements, architectural. It chose an old-style Florida cracker architecture, if you will, as kind of the preferred style for new construction, smaller front setbacks, parking in rear, more traditional look and feel, and I think if you go around today, some of the newer stuff fits within that mold. In there it also identified some specific landscaping, streetscape improvements, as well as gateway designs, which are basically like entry signage. You'll see on the corner of U.S. 41 and Bayshore there is that signage element that was put in as a result of this plan. Some of the progress that we've made, that you-all have made, the county has made since 2000, include -- well, if you've been in and around Haldeman Creek, it is quite the entertainment center these days. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 8 of 52 Naples Steel and Naples Plaza has been developed. There's a new a hotel being constructed now. There's been quite a bit of residential, though most of this has occurred recently. And we're seeing that as -- continues particularly with single-family and some multifamily. With the relocation of the Botanical Gardens, there was a series of density pool units that were captured within the CRA, and these were to give some incentive bonus units elsewhere within the CRA following certain criteria. The plan discusses that as well. Roadway and infrastructure improvements as well as the acquisition of the 17-acre property in about the middle of the CRA where the Botanical Garden used to be, which is still vacant but they're looking at -- the CRA is currently looking at potential catalyst developments. So with the new plan, since we did -- it had been so long, it made a lot more sense just to kind of remove and replace. So what we've done is we've refreshed through a public involvement process, stakeholder interviews, and a variety of means. We've updated the vision statement. We've tweaked that focus to adopt more of an arts and culture focus that has evolved, that Bayshore arts district has been evolving since the adoption of the 2000 plan, and we wanted to grab onto that and make that part of the identity. We've refreshed the goals and objectives and reorganized by theme. We've created character subareas and have some specific recommendations related to each one of those subareas. We've identified branding and marketing and communications projects. Again, going back to those neighborhood focus initiatives, some clean and safe programs, whether that be enhanced code enforcement or other grants and incentives to improve housing, and also we talked about a public arts grant program within the 2019 plan. Some of the infrastructure and transportation contributions, we've talked about complete streets throughout this document, and we've identified specific types of improvements that we think would be appropriate on some of the both neighborhood streets as well as some of your collector streets, whether that be Bayshore or Linwood or any of those. We've got some concepts we've put into the plan and, as Deborah mentioned, this is not regulatory. This is -- we've worked with county staff up to this point but, obviously, further discussion was going to have to happen for implementation and design moving forward. In the updates to the neighborhood improvement, the neighborhood focus initiatives, again, looking at land-use compatibility, neighborhood infrastructure, whether it be stormwater, streetlights, streetscaping, improved sidewalks, those types of things. And then, finally, we updated the catalyst projects. We've created some -- or at least processed and had public discussions about ideas for not only the mini-triangle area and how to help transition from some of the new development that's coming in to some of the more traditional residential and warehouse and flex space. We've also talked about the 17 acres, and we had some specific discussions; we had a community survey about what the community would like to see in that space as it moves forward, looking to bring a new development in. All right. So I'm going to spend a few minutes -- and I won't read all this word for word because I know you all have gone through the plan document, and I'll be glad to talk as long as you want if you have any questions. But this is the refreshed vision statement for the entire plan. And, really, the key is it's about quality of life, economic vitality, encouraging mixed income, urban and multimodal. And what multimodal means is just the ability to get around, whether it be via transit, whether it be via Uber, whether it be via walking on improved sidewalks, bike infrastructure, those types of things. We have a land-use goal focused on defined, harmonious, and urban visual and land-use character with that artistic and kind of cultural arts identity. So how do we -- the thought process that the CRA and the community will be, you know, thinking about moving forward is how do we integrate arts into our all of what we're doing from a land-use component, whether that be public art, murals, art studios, those types of things. I think it needs to be forward in the conversation and has been for some time now with the overlay, but I do think that would be an area where that will be further 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 9 of 52 refined moving forward. Just some example imagery from the CRA. Some of the newer architecture near by. This last image -- I don't know if you can see my mouse -- that's actually in the City of Naples, but we liked the scale and the look and feel of that for some of the more urban areas along Bayshore. We thought that was an appropriate look to kind of mimic. From a public art and gateway, so on the left here -- on my left, on your left as well, that's the existing gateway signage at Bayshore and Tamiami. On the right is just one of a few concepts that we had come up with and that are in the plan for potential refresh of that using the new logo and identity. Currently, there's a lot of nautical themes with some of this signage, and I think there will be a discussion of what do we -- how much of the nautical versus the arts do we want to integrate. So that will be something the CRA and the advisory committee -- I know they're already talking about it. And, actually, I did want to mention, it's -- the CRA endeavor is not just the community, the executive director of the CRA, but she also manages the staff of the MSTU for the Bayshore beautification, which is also going to be integral to anything that happens within the CRA, because they are focused on, you know, streetscape, public realm beautification. So it's a partnership. I don't know how she wears that many hats, but she does. Another item that has come up many times throughout public involvement was just dealing with land use designing transitions, and I think this is what Commissioner Strain was asking about earlier. While not regulatory as a plan now, ultimately, at a future public hearing, there may be recommendations related to the code coming to you to address some of the changes that have occurred since the overlay was adopted. So that will be something in the future that you-all will take a closer look at from a regulatory standpoint. From public spaces, we have -- Bayshore CRA has excellent parks near by, not parks necessarily in the CRA, but you're adjacent to and abutting Sugden in East Naples, which are amazing assets; improving the connections to those, and maybe finding opportunities for some spaces within the CRA itself over time. It was part of this goal. As you can see on the right here, there is -- the stormwater pond on the north in the Triangle, we showed a concept of possible capital improvements to make that a little bit more of a passive park to create a little green space in the north. Right now it is there, but it's not -- you can't tell, should I use it? Can I use it? I know people use it for various purposes. But we made a recommendation in the mid term, I think, if not long term, to really look at making that a bit of a passive park for the neighborhood. More of a neighborhood-scale park for those folks up there. We want to foster and guide private development. Well, this is a big part of what a CRA does is incentivize and invest. One of the main purposes of a CRA is to not only reduce and remove blight but to also look to create a return on investment for itself. When you're funded by a tax increment, it's not a tax; it's increasing property values. So the CRA is looking to bring private investment in in hopes that they can continue to kind of create this cycle of investment in the community. We've had some discussion about some of the main private development sites that may provide opportunities. We talk about some potential incentives that should be considered by the advisory committee. They will be deliberating these moving forward once the plan is adopted. Transportation and walkability, we've already talked about that, that idea of multimodal, safe ability to walk, bike, take transit. We talk in the plan again about those complete streets, which streets would we like to improve, what elements are missing, and can we get them in potentially. So we've made some recommendations about that. We've also talked about parking and the need for the CRA to become more actively involved in parking, which they are very much so. They are in the process of working on a parking lot improvement now. And then we've got, you know, services such as your circulator services, like Slider. We've got one in Tampa as well downtown, all electric cars and vehicles to get people around; park once and go to multiple locations within the area. This is just an example of one of the complete street graphics that are -- you'll find in the document itself. This is actually a Linwood section for some of the commercial areas near, like, upper Naples, where there's an 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 10 of 52 opportunity to create some parking on street as well as a sidewalk. Currently there isn't much of a sidewal k out there because it's older industrial and warehouse. This would be a complete-street concept for a neighborhood street. Again, for streets like Jeepers and some of the smaller neighbor streets not really necessarily want to spend a whole bunch of money investing in, say, a sidewalk because they're dead-end streets, but maybe there's a way to kind of delineate some pedestrian space versus automobile space. So we used some examples we found from around the country to show how that might look. From an infrastructure standpoint, again, environmental and neighborhood design quality through coordinated improvement planning and funding. Infrastructure ultimately is going to have to be a close coordination between the CRA and the county departments that are in charge of capital improvements and investment over time. CRA cannot afford to do it all itself. No matter how much TIF it gets, it really needs to be in concert with county work. So, ultimately, this is a coordination process that could address -- the CRA's been quite active in doing some stormwater improvements at the neighborhood level. Also, as you see on the left here, that's a stormwater slash parking improvement in front of one of the new houses there. That's, like, a turf block with a drain where you can park on it to try to solve a couple problems there. So this will be an ongoing discussion that the CRA's involved with. I know that they continue to work on small-scale stormwater and water improvements in coordination with the City of Naples as well since the city does operate most of the distribution system in the CRA. And then, finally, goal related to process. So, ultimately, as we -- we had great participation. The advisory committee is probably tired of seeing me. Usually I come down, we spend two hours together, and then I leave. We've done that a few times now. So -- but I do -- we did notice that not only with the advisory committee, but there is this need to kind of make sure that we're all -- we're doing a better job of reaching out to all types of participants within the community as well as the county departments and so forth. So we've got some -- just some recommendations related to that process as well. Just showing you some examples. If you didn't believe me, that is actually me in that picture. I was there talking to people and discussing. We had topical advisory committee and stakeholder group meetings. So just making sure that we kind of formalize some of the process. We maybe try to expand a little bit of the outreach, whether it's a -- how are we reaching out to rental communities versus just homeowners. You know, there's a number of condos, but there's also a number of apartments, and how do we bring those different communities to the table as well moving forward. We had conversations with the school district on a couple of occasions just to get a sense of what their students are saying and the experience of their students, the local schools in the area. And so I think having them occasionally interfacing with the CRA would be also beneficial to the overall community. So we talk about that in the plan as well. This is the conceptual diagram, which you are required by statute to have a graphic, a conceptual diagram that kind of identifies what the capital investment projects will be. So you do this in a very summarized way. So this graphic within your plan shows what -- and has corresponding pages with capital improvements listed on it. It talks about the complete streets. It talks about the various other things we've already covered. The character areas, as we noted, we have seven of them identified so far, of which we have started to -- we've talked a little bit about the types of, say, land use and development issues that may be apparent in each of these districts and what that might mean moving forward when somebody comes back with a code amendment, with a plan-amendment discussion in the future. So from a next-step perspective, well, we're here today to make sure that the Planning Commission finds that this plan is consistent with the GMP. Our next step is to go to the CRA, which is the BOCC, sits as the CRA, for their approval. Ultimately, we're planning on doing that next week, depending on if there's no significant changes here today; that will be coming up. We'll go -- both the CRA board and the BCC has to hear the item, so we will be getting their approval on 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 11 of 52 both counts even though it's kind of a "take your hat off and put your other hat on" process. And, ultimately, we will be back. I will be back on April 18th to talk to you-all. This is a tentative date. I don't know if this has actually been booked, but it's what we've tentatively put on our calendars to talk about some of the ideas that we have for amendments to the overlay, and that's a little bit more into that regulatory discussion. It will not be coming in ordinance form. It's just recommendations in a memo but, ultimately, that will be a little bit more detailed discussion about, you know, setbacks and uses and those types of things. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't mean to interrupt your presentation, but I've just got clarification, since you're on that point. The Land Development Code is implementation of the Growth Management Plan. MR. JOHNSON: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The visioning statement here is anticipating changes to the Growth Management Plan. MR. JOHNSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So the GMP changes should probably be more fine tuned as to what specificity this vision statement's going to have on that before we go into possibly LDC language, because I don't know how we'd correlate the LDC language to the potential changes you're talking about as a result of this new vision plan. MR. JOHNSON: If I may -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. MR. JOHNSON: -- I will say that from a GMP perspective, there are some -- and I believe, actually, in the memo that we've put together for recommendations, we do touch a little bit on areas in the GMP that may need to be revisited. But, ultimately, it's not wholesale revisions on the GMP. So I do believe that we can have a conversation about that memorandum and those recommendations absent of knowing exactly what the future changes will be as just a discussion point. Ultimately, somebody will need to come back, whether that be another consultant or staff, and bring those codified at a future date. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Because the way that reads, it looked like you were actually going to have recommendations ready for us to review. It's going to be another more of a vision idea of how the LDC language would evolve as a result of what we're doing today. MR. JOHNSON: Yeah, potentially evolve, yes. And it is a fairly detailed memo, and we can get as much in the weeds as you want, or we can talk about it. But, ultimately, it's just -- this is after we reviewed the code and had our discussions with the public. These are some of the items that we feel, moving forward, you-all will need to address, and that's what we wanted to kind of -- it's a place to start with that discussion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. MR. JOHNSON: No problem. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you have anything else for your presentation? MR. JOHNSON: No, sir, just any questions from you-all. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And just before we start out, I always defer to my other panel members first for their discussion. Just so everybody knows, I had meetings with you and other members of staff in which I had a lot of clarification provided to me on this. I don't believe everybody else here had that accessibility. So I will not have many comments at this point. You've all adequately explained everything. I do have two or three items left as a result of our discussion on just two pages that I would want to discuss. MR. JOHNSON: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But I don't know how we're -- I'm going to turn to the panel first to first see -- and, Tom, did you have something you wanted to add? MR. EASTMAN: Yes, I had a question regarding sidewalks. I believe in one of the slides that you showed you had a street without a sidewalk. MR. JOHNSON: Uh-huh. MR. EASTMAN: And I think sidewalks are good, especially when we're getting a chance to redevelop an area. Could you explain why sidewalks were excluded from the street plan? MR. JOHNSON: Sure, sure. So what we've -- what we talked about as we started -- you've got this main roadway or two main roadways, say Thomasson and Bayshore, and you have a number of neighborhood-level 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 12 of 52 streets without a lot of right-of-way, not a lot of pavement, that are just dead ends. There's a couple of them that have, like, access points into the parks, which, absolutely, those already have sidewalks, and there have been some sidewalk improvements on some of the larger ones of those streets, but there are a number of streets where, just from a strategic planning cost-management perspective, we don't necessarily think that the traffic volumes would necessitate the extra drainage additions that you would have to take care of with putting a sidewalk in as well as, you know, other provisions. So all we've suggested in the plan was there may be some streets, some of these neighborhood dead-ends streets, that you could use another approach which typically has been done in other places, is creating kind of a shared bike/pedestrian space and add some lighting and improve safety dramatically over what's there now without necessarily spending maybe infrastructure dollars that are -- you know, you're competing always between priorities. So that was our approach to doing that. Yes, sir. MR. EASTMAN: In these areas where you're not doing the sidewalks, is there open swale drainage? MR. JOHNSON: Typically -- I can't speak for every single street but, for the most part, yes. MR. EASTMAN: It seems if multimodal is a big factor, then sidewalks should be of paramount importance or at least rise to that level -- MR. JOHNSON: Right. MR. EASTMAN: -- and putting sidewalks, maybe piping drainage where you have swales, maybe less insects and, certainly, I think, would increase the property value and create a safe area for peo ple to walk. We have a high population of senior citizens who probably don't want to walk right next to the road. It seems like sidewalks are really, really important. MR. JOHNSON: And we have -- I believe in our capital plan we have an assumption built in in both short term, mid term, and long term for as yet unspecified sidewalk improvements, because we couldn't just call out every single -- this is a 30-year vision of where we want to go. So I absolutely -- I agree that sidewalks are very important. I think our solution or our potential approach was just to show you that you might not need to -- you could remove improve safety significantly without necessarily putting a sidewalk on every single one of these little side roads. But I hear you, and I think the CRA advisory board -- I think the last time visited with them they were debating and discussing sidewalks and where it's appropriate and where we need to focus, so it will still be a major part of the conversation, and we've allocated money to that effect from a sidewalk perspective. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. What I'd like to do and where I was going to go is see what the panel would like to do as how to approach this document. I've only got two pages in questions, so for me it's rather simple. But I know from the rest of you, there may be lengthy discussions. I don't want the whole meeting wrapped up in just one person's discussions. So I think we ought to break it down by page sections. Possibly we go every 50 pages, then there's -- and the problem with that is we've all got different pages. Karen uses a different process than I do, and I use a different process than the rest of you. So you've got over 700 pages, I only have 629, and I'm not sure how many Karen has because hers are in print form. So we'll just have to go by volume, I guess. Maybe 50 pages at a time, and when I get to my end, I'm done. I'll have mine answered, and you guys can go on for your unknown pages after I have my 629 pages completed. So with that, let's start with the first 50 pages. Does anybody have any questions? Joe? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah, I have a question basically, on -- well, it's on the -- and -- well, it's on the executive summary. MR. JOHNSON: Okay. If it will help, I'll just go ahead and open up a PDF if you think that -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, yours -- yeah, you can try. I mean, what we find out is yours may not be matching any of ours at all either, so we'll just have to do the best we can. MR. JOHNSON: That works. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: On the executive summary, and it's where it says "fiscal impact," and this was really for the staff. It's probably for Mike Bosi and Dave Weeks. It says there's no fiscal impact directly imposed by the adoption of the updated Community Redevelopment Plan. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 13 of 52 Though factually correct, it's also implied factually incorrect. For every dollar of TIF that is, well, sent into the -- as was described, into the trust fund, that is a direct dollar-to-dollar loss to the General Fund and the Unincorporated Fund, Fund 111 and 001. And the Board should clearly understand that there is a fiscal impact, and that impact is a loss of revenue to the county in the General Fund that has to be made up by the rest of the public and the county. So it's -- it is -- there is a fiscal impact. Any CRA has a fiscal impact, and that should be pointed out clearly in the -- in identifying the potential impact of -- even the extending of the CRA, it does create a long-term loss -- MR. JOHNSON: Sure. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- to the General Fund that has to be made up elsewhere, or the Board just accepts it as a loss in their budgeting process. MR. JOHNSON: So making sure that -- sorry. So making sure that maybe that language is modified a bit to more clearly explain? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. I think maybe Deb Forester or the staff would clearly have to make sure the Board understands there is a direct correlation for every dollar that goes into the -- MR. JOHNSON: That is held in the trust fund. Would not be -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Held in a trust fund is money lost in the General Fund, and it has to be made up elsewhere in the budgetary process, or not made up. That's a budget decision that's a direct impact on 001 and Fund 111. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is that it on the first 50? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No, I have more, but, I think -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, why don't you get done -- we'll just move across the panel. And why don't you get done with yours first, and then we'll go to the next, and we'll come back again for the next 50. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm on page -- it's Page 3 of the -- Section 1.1, Page 3 point -- the fiscal and social economical impact. Basically, we're stating that Bayshore/Gateway is still considered a blighted area; is that correct? MR. JOHNSON: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And to eliminate -- and back in Paragraph 5, it says, to eliminate substandard housing conditions and to provide adequate amount of housing. Can you explain what -- how you classify substandard housing and what do you mean by substandard housing? Is this housing that should be condemned? Is this housing that is subjectively substandard? What do you mean by that? MR. JOHNSON: So the statutes as far as substandard buildings and structures is the actual language that's used. That could mean a variety of things, and typically it -- looking at whether it could be structures that need to be condemned. It could be -- you have a situation in Bayshore where you have a number of mobile homes that are in very, very poor condition and predate any modern safety standards, right? And those would be situations where that would be a substandard structure within the district. We look at code enforcement data as well, typically. We did not do a finding of necessity for this, but that is the original document that documented all of these issues. But, you know, obviously, we've done windshield surveys, we've gone around, we've taken photos; we've done a lot of documentation of conditions. So, typically, that would be something where you could have existing single-family residential with -- where it's worn out, physical conditions are poor, it's got a number of code-enforcement issues related to the structure. You can also have more obvious ones, which you do have a number of, which could include things like the mobile homes that are in really poor condition. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. But the CRA's been in -- basically, in existence for 18 -- almost 18 years. MR. JOHNSON: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And then it goes on to say on that same page, a blighted area, and it means either the areas that is a substantial number of slum deteriorated and deteriorated structures and conditions which endanger life, property, and by high fire and other causes, and it goes on to state basically a blighted area. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 14 of 52 The visioning statement seems to indicate that the entire area is still deemed a blighted area even though there's been significant improvements over the last 18 years. MR. JOHNSON: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And, in fact, it implies that it ought to -- there's some areas where it says that the CRA footprint should be increased. That sort of implies that the last 18 years have been a failure. MR. JOHNSON: Oh, I would disagree with that. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, I know you disagree with it; of course, you do. But your document is stating that the area's still blighted when, in fact, 18 years, there certainly has been some significant changes, especially in areas along 41. MR. JOHNSON: No. And I agree that there have been significant improvements, particularly in the last several years. Say the second half of that 18-year span, there's definitely been significant improvements. And what you're seeing now is you're seeing actually where the private market is investing more in individual homes and lots, probably more so than it's done certainly since 2000, and there's been an increased interest. And I think that we need to celebrate the fact that there has been a lot of progress, that it is becoming a place that -- where what we said we were going to do back in 2000 we are starting to be able to do, though it has taken some time. But that doesn't mean that blight has been completely eradicated within the area of the CRA. And so from a statutory standpoint, if it is a blighted area and it's been designated as such and these conditions still exist, then it would continue to be designated that way by just the fact that it's a CRA. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. I don't agree with you, but that's fine. MR. JOHNSON: When you look at any -- when you look at any CRA, I think there's always a mix. I mean, these are areas that will have areas that are very problematic. But once redevelopment starts to occur, certainly you see improvements, and the design of a CRA is to use those new developments to continue to fund improvements in the more problematic areas. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Section 1.5, and this is on Page 7, you use a term "diversity of ownership." Removing nonconforming uses who are (sic) overcome diversity of ownership. Can you explain what the intent there is? What is the diversity of ownership? MR. JOHNSON: So, again, that's the statutory language. That section you're reading from, those are the different criteria that the statutes require you to look at to establish a CRA in the beginning. And so a diversity of ownership could mean that you have a number of -- we could have a number of small commercial sites that are owned by multiple entities that have issues of title that make aggregation of properties or redevelopment problematic. That could be a diversity of ownership. You could have -- because oftentimes, particularly with redevelopment, it's going to require taking properties that were maybe of standards in the 1960s and bringing them up to a modern development standard, and that typically requires more land, more parking, more stormwater, all of those things that come along with new development. So a diversity of ownership can range to mean anything from issues with title in the fact that we don't know who owns it or how to acquire it. I know after the last recession, there were a lot of issues related to foreclosures and zombie properties, for lack of a better term. That definitely would be considered problematic when you're talking about redevelopment, encouraging development. But it also can just mean we've got a ton of really, really small commercial parcels that are maybe substandard, maybe don't meet what would be considered a highest and best use or a better use within the community, and how we go about aggregating those or incentivizing to aggregate those over time. That could also be considered a diversity of ownership. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Section 1.5 -- and this plan is asking -- the first paragraph, the amendment will extend the terms to 2049, and that is a goal that's being stated but, of course, that would have to be a separate action for the Board. This plan just identifies it as a goal. MR. JOHNSON: Correct. Now -- sorry. I thought I heard Deborah coming behind me. MS. FORESTER: So right now this plan says to extend it to 2049. That's the 30 years. We are going to be having this conversation with the Board when the Board considers the adoption of this plan. And they have a 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 15 of 52 variety of options that are going to be presented to them. They could go with the 30; they could not extend the life at all; they could find a happy medium. So our plan and the projects that we've identified go out the 30 years, if you look at our capital projects. So that fiscal impact that you mentioned earlier, all of that is going to be discussed at the Board level because that is their responsibility, to determine the length of the CRA. So while this plan currently says it goes out 30 years, at the adoption hearing the Board may very well say that they don't want to do that or they want to change that number to a different number. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But the plan does not actually codify the extension? Doesn't that have to be a separate action of the Board? MS. FORESTER: No. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No. MS. FORESTER: This is the plan. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So if they approve this plan, they actually approve the extension of the CRA? MS. FORESTER: Right. But, again, that fiscal impact will be discussed at the Board level from their budgeting perspective. I don't believe it has an impact on the Growth Management component as you're reviewing it today. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Interesting. Mark, do you want me to keep on going? I don't know if anybody else had any questions. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Fifty pages. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Fifty pages, all right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I mean, do you have -- Joe, if you've got -- I didn't expect anybody to have a lot of questions, but if we want to move to others and come back to you, that maybe will work, too. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Page 10, in use of tax incremental revenues, develop affordable housing within the redevelopment area. How much affordable housing has been developed using tax incremental financing in the last 18 years? MR. JOHNSON: I don't know if we've used any for the purposes of developing affordable housing. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's in the plan. MR. JOHNSON: Well, it's in this plan, yes, sir. MS. FORESTER: And, again, I think the option here is we're providing a menu. So right now the statute encourages us to look at making sure we have a mixed-income neighborhood, and that's providing housing for a whole variety of the workforce and the elderly. So what this plan does is say that if the Board should choose to help to fund affordable housing in the area, they could, because it's identified as one of the menu options. So that would, again, require us to come back to the Board of County Commissioners, the CRA, and say we are going to take these funds, and we're going to do this agreement with a private developer or whoever to do that. So this -- again, we're trying to create sort of an overall vision and a menu of opportunities here. And everything that's listed does not mean we will do it, but it's a plan. And what the plan also does is it requires us to come back every five years, review that plan with the Board of County Commissioners and the CRA board and see if they want to revise it. So they always have that opportunity. Because we are a county CRA, they could certainly make changes whenever they chose to do that. So today we're just trying to provide you an array of choices that can then be further decided at a future date with the Board of County Commissioners and the CRA advisory committee also making recommendations to that board. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Just -- and that language seems to be somewhat contradictory to the other goals within the CRA, but that's the reason I asked the question. I mean, there are -- if it's an objective to use TIFF money for affordable housing, I think you need to identify in more detail how you're going to do that, or if it's a goal, or is it just some lofty suggestion in the plan? Because there is a diversity in housing. That's why I asked the question about diversity of housing. And 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 16 of 52 my impression was, well, we want to eliminate what others may deem blight or some may seem to indicate that is affording housing. You know, there's mobile home parks there and other areas down in there, and some people find that very affordable. Others consider that blight. MS. FORESTER: We want to provide safe housing. I think that's the key. And so some of those older mobile homes to talk about a replacement program where we can still provide affordability but in a safer environment. And, you know, I want to correct the statement that we've never provided any funding for affordable housing, because the CRA over years has had a residential grant program, so there was a sweat-equity program. If somebody wanted to come in and assist with improving their conditions, that was available. We haven't been funding it over the last couple of years just due to funding. But I believe as we move forward that residential grant program will probably come back in, and that will be funded with the use of tax-increment dollars. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. I wanted to raise the issue. I'm going to ask one question, and then I'll defer to other staff for a while or other members of the Board. But the next several pages all include discussion of Immokalee. My only general question is we went through the Immokalee Master Plan. I didn't look at any of this language addressing Immokalee. I would assume at some time the language within this CRA will be amended to sync with the Immokalee Master Plan. MS. FORESTER: What we're hoping to do -- and, again, they're two separate documents with two separate, sort of, goals. So as you're going through the Immokalee Area Master Plan, we want to get that completed, and then we will go back and look at Section 4 of the redevelopment plan to look at updating that to make sure it is consistent with that new Immokalee Area Master Plan. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Because, again, I didn't go through any of that at all. MS. FORESTER: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. I'm up to Section 5, and I'll defer to other members of the Board, because I do have some questions in Section 5 as well. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Section 5 of the first 50 pages? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, I'm on -- it takes me to Page 47 of the plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I just wanted to make sure I need to come back to you if we've still got to finish the first pages. That's all I'm trying to get through. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. I'll stop, because I'm up to Section 5 of the document. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Karen, did you have anything you wanted on the first 50? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I'm not sure what the first 50 is. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, in the end, when we get done today, if you have any questions, I'll just ask you, and you can go through. I notice you didn't tab anything, but we'll just do the best we can. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: No. It's all concerned with Bayshore and -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: -- basically, housing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ned, yours? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Chairman, if you're leaving at 10:30, do you want to go first? Would it make more sense? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You're telling me you've got -- it's going to take more than -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: It might. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Wow. Yeah. I just have two quick questions, since I have gone through this in detail before coming here. I just don't have a lot of questions left, and you guys were nice enough to help me the other day in the questions I did have. If you turn to future land-use densities. It's on Page 5-3-6 of your document. MR. JOHNSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's Page 101 of my document. MR. JOHNSON: 5-3-6 helps me out. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 17 of 52 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. And I've only got two questions, and then I'm done for today, and I'll to leave it with my board to -- MR. JOHNSON: I'm there. I pulled it up on my computer. It's a little easier. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: On the table you have there, you have future land uses, and it says in the second one down, "Redevelopment overlay, properties with access to U.S. 41, East Bayshore, Davis, west side of Airport-Pulling Road." In there you have densities where you talk about 12 UPAs from the density pool. The last sentence says, "The mini-triangle catalyst site east of Davis/U.S. 41 intersection is an exception with a maximum 70 dwelling UPAs." Now, there are a variety of plans on record for the Bayshore CRA. We have a mini-triangle designation on one plan. We have a mini-triangle subdistrict which was created for part of the catalyst area, and then we have the mini-triangle catalyst project, which is the entire properties at the point, including the county's property and the piece in front. MR. JOHNSON: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But you're saying here that the 70 dwelling units have been awarded to the mini-triangle catalyst site. Do you really mean that, or do you mean the mini-triangle subdistrict? MR. JOHNSON: So when this was written, the focus was on the county's ownership. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You need to read -- you need to rewrite it in there, because the way this -- MR. JOHNSON: Right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What you've written covers -- MR. JOHNSON: The entire -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- on the maps the whole triangle -- the whole mini-triangle, and you don't mean to do that. I'm sure you don't. It had an MPUD there. MR. JOHNSON: And that was specific to the PUD at the time that we had reviewed it for the county's ownership, not for the point. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The property in the point never had applied for 70 units per acre. MR. JOHNSON: Correct, correct, right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So you can correct that paragraph? MR. JOHNSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And then there's a little Footnote 1 next to the -- after Airport Road under your future land use, and that Footnote 1 says the following: "According to Collier County Growth Management staff, this definition is interpreted broadly to mean properties that can gain access to the roads, whether directly, (access point on the road) or via one or more other roads. It is not viewed narrowly to mean have an access onto the road. As a result, the definition encompasses all properties in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle overlay except those east of Airport Road." Why don't you just say that instead of a footnote that's going to make the whole thing kind of hard for people to figure out without understanding what county staff has interpreted this to mean? MR. JOHNSON: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Basically say everything in Bayshore. MR. JOHNSON: Yeah. We came to where we should -- we could have started with that, sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So that -- on that page, those are the two points I'm suggesting that -- MR. JOHNSON: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- are clarified. Then the last comment I have is where you've reproduced the Immokalee language. We know from the master plan that came through here two weeks ago that the districts in Immokalee have dramatically changed in what they can and can't do. You have a low residential, mixed residential, high residential, nonresidential, commercial, industrial and all the rest, yet that language remains the same. Now, Immokalee's one step ahead of Bayshore in regards to changing their on-the-ground uses by the Comprehensive Plan, yet their language hasn't changed. Can you tell me why we've got you going in doing it step 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 18 of 52 by step as it probably should have been done versus Immokalee coming in and changing a master plan without changing their vision statement in the redevelopment plan? MS. FORESTER: It's sort of like a chicken-and-an-egg situation here. So you can do it a variety of ways. So Immokalee, because they have been working on that area master plan for a long time as you know, they proceeded with that. So we can't do the redevelopment plan until they finish that. In the Bayshore district, before I came back, the community decided it was time to update their redevelopment plan. So we're doing it this way. So the statute doesn't really provide too much guidance that you have to do one before the other, so -- but we didn't want to go in and really touch Section 4 of this plan that deals with Immokalee until after they get the master plan approved. So we will come back and do that hopefully in 2020. But for right now we just tried to do some basic updates. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So what you're saying by the way we're looking at this today is the redevelopment plan that currently exists for what you want to do in Bayshore is inconsistent with the vision plan -- that vision plan that we're now seeing today because the new vision plan -- well, both of them will be consistent with the GMP. Is that what you're saying, the current vision plan and the new vision plan? MS. FORESTER: Yes, current will be consistent with the Growth Management Plan today that we have for Bayshore. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So do you consider the new Immokalee Master Plan that's going through the system right now to be consistent with the visioning plan? MS. FORESTER: The current visioning plan as -- I don't -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Look on Page 315, and you'll see the practical application. The information that I'm finding here under consistency with the Growth Management Plan in the Immokalee section talks about the districts that we just changed in the Immokalee Master Plan that now would make that master plan inconsistent with these districts. How does that work? MS. FORESTER: I think you could go ahead and change the Growth Management Plan without impacting their redevelopment opportunities. And then once that Growth Management Plan is changed, then we will come back and we will clarify this. But you can't -- you don't have to stop redevelopment to occur because you're making changes to the Growth Management Plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I'm not suggesting we stop redevelopment from occurring. I'm suggesting that the redevelopment that's occurring now should be consistent with this vision statement that was adopted as part, by this board and others, as being consistent with the GMP but now the GMP that you've wrote is not consistent with that previous vision plan. MS. FORESTER: I think the changes -- again, we haven't focused on Immokalee, but when they referenced the Growth Management Plan in here, there had been other changes done. If you recall, in 2000, they were going through a number of growth management items in Immokalee. So -- and, unfortunately, we weren't updating the redevelopment plan as things were changing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So are you saying that you have a vision plan that was amended for Immokalee that would have been consistent, then, with the master plan that we've processed last week or two weeks ago? MS. FORESTER: I haven't looked at that in close proximity with this redevelopment plan. I'd have to sit down and look at that. But today we're not proposing to make any real changes to the Immokalee plan and, unfortunately, because of the way we are organized, I guess, as a CRA, with one plan, two component areas, we're doing it in sections. So today we're doing Bayshore/Gateway. Next year we'll do the Immokalee. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let me read a section to you in the statute. Section 163.360(2)(b). The plan should be -- "The plan shall be sufficiently complete to indicate such land-use acquisition, demolition, and removal of structures, redevelopment, improvements and rehabilitation as may be proposed to be carried out in the community redevelopment areas," then it's a comma, "zoning and planning changes, if any, land uses, maximum densities, and building requirements." The Immokalee Master Plan that we reviewed doesn't meet those requirements because of the zoning changes proposed that are part of the plan that's attached to the document you're asking us to review today even 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 19 of 52 though it's not Immokalee that you're focusing on today; it's Bayshore. My concern now is, how is -- when I met with you, you hadn't given me 629 pages to read. Unfortunately, I did read the full 629 pages since then. Now that Immokalee is clearly different than the plan that was produced that this board reviewed two weeks ago, I still don't see how that plan can proceed without first changing the context of the redevelopment agency's vision statement to be consistent so the plan and -- is consistent with the vision statement and the vision statement is consistent with the GMP. I don't know how you're getting there now that I've read this. MS. FORESTER: And I'll have to spend some time comparing what's in here and what the new Immokalee Area Master Plan is and that we can be prepared by the time it comes back after transmittal to look at those issues. And then at that time we can certainly look at making any modifications that's required in this redevelopment plan if there's a conflict between the two. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are we being asked today to -- when we improve this, is it going to be approving the CRA's redevelopment plan for both sections of the CRA, Immokalee and Bayshore? MS. FORESTER: It's to adopt -- or to make a recommendation to adopt as the changes are presented to you today. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So we are de facto, then, accepting the documents today even though we know they may not be consistent -- well, I can tell you they aren't consistent with the plan that we've previously reviewed for Immokalee. MS. FORESTER: The plan that you have reviewed is not adopted yet, correct? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So you're going to hold adoption off until this gets corrected? MS. FORESTER: We can if that's the direction of the Board, and I think that's what I'm suggesting that we can do is we can look at the Immokalee Area Master Plan, look at this redevelopment section for Immokalee. The advisory committee for the redevelopment area has put that on their priority list to look at making the changes to the redevelopment plan. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That was my comment: All of Section 4 in this document is the old plan, and none of it's been amended, and it all has to deal with Immokalee. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So we're approving the old plan even though it's not consistent with the plan we just reviewed last week. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And your suggestion is we -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Except the new master plan is in there, correct, Deborah? I'm seeing a new master plan for Immokalee in the package with the old plan crossed out. MS. FORESTER: No. The Immokalee plan is in there. It's not being crossed out. The only changes that were made in the Immokalee section had to do with the Future Land Use Map and the boundary map. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Correct. But you're putting in the new Immokalee Area Master Plan in the package. I can't tell you what page I'm on, but I'm after the references to the -- well, it's in Section 4.3, and it's after page -- your next page is after 23. You've got a crossed-out Immokalee Future Land Use Map and a new map. MS. FORESTER: Yeah. And that is the existing map today. That is what is adopted and is on your website as the Future Land Use Map for Immokalee. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: But Figure 3 is not the current -- the next page, Figure 3 -- because this page has got an X on it, and then -- I mean, I can put it on the visualizer if you want to know what I'm talking about. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The only -- the Immokalee Master Plan they have in here is the one we're currently using today, not the one that went through us two weeks ago, because it wasn't adopted yet. MS. FORESTER: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Figure 3 -- yeah, Figure 3 is the current plan. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: That's the current plan? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's the current plan, yeah. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: It's got the crosshatching, so I thought it was the new one. Okay. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 20 of 52 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. MS. FORESTER: That's the one that I believe is the current plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You've got to use the mike. MS. FORESTER: Sorry. I believe that's the plan that is today. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It is. My -- and I'll just leave it for research. I mean, we have not -- you're asking us to now go through the transmittal process subject to possibly changes as a result of now making -- changing the Immokalee section to make consistent with a plan that is ahead of the vision statement. I'm not -- for adoption. Now I don't know what apple cart that's going to upturn, but I'm a little concerned about taking things out of step like that. I like the way you've done Bayshore. Honestly, if we started out with the bottom rung of the ladder and understood how the ladder -- how we're moving up the ladder, it would have been easier for us to understand that Immokalee Master Plan. It wasn't done that way in Immokalee, unfortunately. I think Bayshore is doing it the right way, so I don't have any problem with your Bayshore process. But it has brought a question in now as to how we're doing the Immokalee in comparison. So I'll leave it at that. That was a statement. Somehow it's going to have to work its way through by the time we move forward. Maybe the Board will want to weigh in on it; I don't know. MS. FORESTER: And I will do that. I will look at it. I think probably when this plan was written in 2000 -- and I can take credit or concern about that, is we probably put too much detail about what the Growth Management Plan said. That wasn't really necessary in this redevelopment plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And when you get into it, Deborah, if you call me before we come to the next meeting, we might be able to save a lot of people's time. I don't mean to take up people's time on issues I'm focusing on, so... Okay. That's the only two questions I had. And, Ned, if you want to go forward. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you for the time. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Thank you. My first question is general in nature, and it has to do with what our proper role is as the Planning Commission. And I understand that under the statute there's a reference to running this through us for consistency with the Growth Management Plan. Is that the extent that it is permissible or desirable for us to review this? MR. BOSI: Yes. The Planning Commission is being asked to review this plan for consistency with the GMP. COMMISSIONER FRYER: And that's all we're being asked to do? MR. BOSI: That's all you're being asked to do. You can make comments. You can provide suggestions. You can have evaluations of any of the strategies that are within there based upon your own individual experience, but those would just be in terms of trying to improve a plan in a way that you think would be a positive effect. But the only action that we're asking you to do is review it for consistency with the current GMP. COMMISSIONER FRYER: And so if we limited ourselves in that way, that would be the end of it for us. We wouldn't see it again, would we? MR. BOSI: That would be the end of your review of this redevelopment plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But it comes back in the form of the GMP and the LDC. MR. BOSI: Well, there will be future actions that would -- at a separate time that would be implementing some of these -- some of these proposals, whether it be the LDC amendments, whether it be the GMP amendments. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll also see it on adoption, won't we, Mike? This will come back on adoption. MR. BOSI: This is not a Growth Management Plan. This is not a regulatory action. This is -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I didn't -- MR. BOSI: -- support documentation for the redevelopment plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then I'm a little confused because I thought Deborah just stood up and 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 21 of 52 said we're going to see it again on adoption, so what we do today we can see come back and have another bite at the apple. I didn't understand why she said it, but I accepted it. MR. BOSI: The Immokalee Area Master Plan will be coming back for adoption, which is a Growth Management Plan, which is following the state process. This is a simple one-off in terms of review of the redevelopment plan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So this redevelopment plan goes into the process, is done, then we build the CRA changes to the GMP, if any. They come back to us, and that's the meat and nuts and bolts of the language, and then the LDC will follow, and then that language will be rewritten to whatever extent needed. Does that help? COMMISSIONER FRYER: It helps me understand, but it doesn't satisfy me, and here's why: And the County Attorney has many times said to us that the Growth Management Plan is our plan in the first instance and that we are, under statute, the local planning agency. This vision document will, down the road, assuming it is adopted, then be pointed to as justification for amending the GMP and the LDC in order to be consistent with this document which, to me, makes it a very, very important document. And so for us to just have one look at it, recognizing that the CRA advisory board has looked at it -- and I think that's good, and that it may go back to the CRA advisory board. But I've got a lot of concerns about this thing that you're going to hear about later this morning, and particularly if this is our only bite at the apple. MR. KLATZKOW: It doesn't have to be. I mean, if you want to see it again, you ask staff to bring it back again. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Well -- so am I correct that our role doesn't need to be confined to consistency with the current GMP? MR. KLATZKOW: Your recommendation's going to be whether or not it's consistent. As far as the discussions and everything else that goes, you're free to ask whatever you want. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Thank you. So I think where I'm going to personally be coming to, when the time comes to vote, subject to or depending upon how the answers to my questions come out, is that this does come back to us. I'm glad to focus on consistency with the GMP, but this brings me to my second point. Actually, the first point I was going to make was well made by Commissioner Schmitt about the budget that -- when you create a TIF, you're basically removing funds from the General Fund, and somehow it has to be either made up for or will result in an LOS change, I guess, in other parts of the county. And I'm not saying whether that's bad or good. It's just a fact. That's money that's out of the General Fund. And so that point was well made, and I second it. Now, the thing that is of concern to me here, and it's a little bit aligned with the Chairman's concern about getting carts before horses, and this has to do with the relationship of this document to the current GMP. In my personal opinion, having been on this board for two years and a little bit, two years and some change, I've seen -- I personally have been frustrated about how we find ourselves limited by provisions of the GMP that may hav e not been fully tested or validated, and now we're being asked to endorse a vision plan that deals directly with some of these problematic issues, or at least they're issues that are problematic to me such as the concept of a TCMA bonus. I've also felt that that has -- if that has been validated, I have not seen the validation. I think that an argument can be made that it should be a penalty rather than a bonus for TCMA additional housing units being granted. I remain open minded about that, but I'd like to see some validation before we then start, you know, changing our vision statement on the assumption that points like that have been validated. Another one is having to do with complete streets. In some areas I think that's a good idea, but even in this report -- and I can find the page for you if you don't remember it, but there was a concession in your report that the concept of complete streets will result in more traffic congestion. Do you recall saying that? MR. JOHNSON: I could -- certainly language like that -- I don't remember the page it was on, but -- 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 22 of 52 COMMISSIONER FRYER: We'll come to it. But I'll find it, and I'll point it out to you. But it's the concept that I want to talk about right now. MR. JOHNSON: Okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Because, for instance, if you were to constrain the East Trail by means of making it a so-called complete street, you're going to be taking geography away from automobile roadway, and that is already a very busy street. It's a street where there's frequent congestion. Now, if we were doing that, we'd be doing it in the name of alternate forms of transportation: Bicycles, pedestrians, and the like. Again, has that been validated? Has that concept been validated for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, or is it just a general concept sort of aspirational in nature that complete streets are kind of good everywhere? MR. JOHNSON: So I think there's -- I mean, from our perspective and what we've done for the purposes of the plan, there have been discussions related to 41. We didn't validate any specific information related to them. That was much more aspirational, and, of course, that would require, you know, close coordination with DOT and any type of long-term conversations. As far as internal to the CRA itself where these are county roadways and so forth, again, we didn't do validation. There have been some concepts recommended in the past. We thought that some of those concepts made a lot of sense and they were consistent with what we were hearing from the community, so we wanted to make sure, as Deborah pointed out, that they're part of the potential menu of pursuits that the CRA could undertake over the next 30 years. COMMISSIONER FRYER: But the concept of complete streets is pervasive in your report. MR. JOHNSON: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Pervasive. MR. JOHNSON: Absolutely. COMMISSIONER FRYER: And I can see some good aspects of it in certain areas, but I don't think one size fits all, and particularly in a community -- well, in many communities in Southwest Florida where you have elderly people who are less inclined, I think, to be riding bicycles. MR. JOHNSON: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRYER: You have very young people who are driving automobiles and riding bicycles. Having -- in my judgment, on a busy roadway like the East Trail, having automobiles and bicycles and pedestrians all together on the same platform, I think that's dangerous. It may work on Bayshore, but I certainly can't see it working on the East Trail or some of the larger streets. So that's two of the three concerns I had. Then the third concern that I have about the GMP -- and here we're trying to tailor solutions or adjust our vision in a way that would match important aspects of the GMP. One of the aspects in there that is important but I find the way the GMP currently handles it is very troublesome, and that has to do with what we're able to do and what the Board of County Commissioners is able to do with respect to developments -- proposals that come in on nearby streets that are going to be deficient within five years. There seems to be very little we can do in those circumstances. And so to summarize my general concerns, they are that we can -- we're dressing up a vision plan here to give effect to certain aspects of the Growth Management Plan that I don't believe have been yet fully validated, and I have some specific concerns, but that's my -- that and the budget point that Commissioner Schmitt made were my two general points. I don't know if you want to take a break now, and I'll come back page by page or what. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Probably, if you're going to do that, let's take a break for 15 minutes and come back at 10:40. (A brief recess was had, and Chairman Strain left the boardroom for the remainder of the meeting.) MR. BOSI: Chair, you have a live mike. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Thank you. Okay. I think we'll just go through Bayshore Section 5. They're both -- whatever pages they are, I have two packets. They both have the same Section 5 in them. So if you want to go page by page, if that's how you 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 23 of 52 want to -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: I do, and I think Commissioner Schmitt's going to hit one. My first one is going to come after his, I think, at Page 5-E-6. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. But I just want to -- MR. JOHNSON: Oh, yeah. I just wanted to ask if I have a second to say something. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: I just wondered at what point -- there were some -- some people have left. If there's the CRA people here who want to speak from Bayshore, if we want to hear from them first or -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: I was hoping that we did have some people here from the advisory board. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: There are some. They are -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'd like to hear from them. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: And you have speakers slips. MR. BOSI: Yeah, we have two speaker slips submitted. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Just two? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Go with that first. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: I'd like to hear from them. MR. BOSI: The first speaker we have is Al Schantzen followed by Donna McGinnis. MR. SCHANTZEN: Al Schantzen. I'm the newest member of the CRA board. And I appreciate the opportunity, the opportunity to speak. I'm here to support changes in the plan especially when it comes towards the -- one of the concerns a member mentioned was on the blight side. Other than the full process and everything, as I sit back and observe what's going on here, I was looking to have more feeling for the whole process and everything. So, basically, I'm here to support anything that we can do to help with decreasing the blight in my neighborhood, and I appreciate the opportunity to speak. But that's about all I have at this time. Any questions, I'm okay. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: As far as, how do you classify "blight" in your neighborhood? And where do you live? MR. SCHANTZEN: I live on Canal Street, which is off of Bayshore. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: On Canal Street. MR. SCHANTZEN: And it has to do with a lot of indigents and vagrants that are in the area, and the drugs and stuff like that come into the area and are kind of rooted in ways that the plan and the activity -- working with the county agencies and the sheriff are focused to fight these problems and making them stay focused to fight and combat and clean up, including working with property owners that aren't always cooperative that have these properties that sometimes facilitate them and also working with the sheriff's attorneys and the County Attorney on giving the tools to the law enforcement and Code Enforcement to properly go about and combat these issues. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: How does this CRA deal with that? Because everything you've said has to do with political will, political direction, and, of course, community involvement with the other agencies within the county, whether it's the Sheriff's Office, Code Enforcement, or other issues, but the CRA specifically, the only way they can deal with blight, at least in this document, is, of course, through maybe community meetings but also in dealing with the zoning and overlays, and what it really means is we're going to convert what is -- you want to use the word "substandard housing." We're going to try and buy up those substandard housing and build what is deemed to be adequate housing. I don't know. That's the only thing I could see that the CRA is going to do to solve your problem. MR. SCHANTZEN: In with it also becomes money available to do the outreach and help the residential areas improve with those landlords, go in partnerships with these landlord, they improve their properties. The mobile homes types thing is working with the property owners and replacement and things, taking funds and programs available. In the Florida Statutes that creates the CRA, I read that there is different programs that are within the capability of the CRA to do. And I'm here to support anything that can be coordinated locally, and identified, which we have been doing with our regular CRA meetings and stuff with the outreach with the sheriff and Code 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 24 of 52 Enforcement, very informative and very positive in nature of working towards those objectives of taking some of the problem areas and going -- focus more residential in the problem areas than towards the commercial environmental which, in itself, is starting to flourish and go. You just need to grab and tag the residential in the lower income housing element into it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. You answered my question. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I have a question. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Thank you, sir, for advocating for your area, and your area is important to us, too, and we want to do what can be done to help out in that way, and that's the whole thrust of the redevelopment plan. We want to get it as good as possible. First point you just made was about crime and drugs, vagrancy and the like. I was surprised not to see -- well, I don't think I saw a single reference in this consultant's report, at least not any that took it in significant detail, that perhaps that's where we should be spending more money on law enforcement, perhaps, streetlighting. There are other conventional and high technology ways of reducing the kinds of problems that you just mentioned, and so I was surprised that that is either not at all treated in here or maybe was mentioned but certainly not with much emphasis. But what would your view be on more law enforcement infrastructure of that kind? MR. SCHANTZEN: Okay. In my preview of the document and working with the document, like I says, I wasn't on board the -- as a member when this got made. I just -- my first board meeting is coming up. But through the process of reading this, I do see where they do address the blight and the community outreach and different things. In fact, they've already started doing some things they have not done in the past with the community outreach and stuff, which made me very active in the situation. With the streetlightings and stuff like that, they also have that going in. And as stated, this is a menu for -- of what we would like to see happen in our area of -- generalized a lot of things and some of them are pointed. One of the things that as a CRA board member, I -- and my opinion is asked for or what my priorities are out of this menu list of what we work towards, and that's the steps on the near term, one to three years, five to whatever, and going out 30 is what you basically look at, what you would like to try and accomplish and what the priorities are that you want the CRA to work towards and apply the funds to in the near term, mid term, and long term. Keeping focus on this and also things that externally come in via development or other suggestions. And so the blight and the vagrant and a lot of crime issues or whatever are, with me, a very short term looking for solutions in the short term, which there's different aspects of what's in here and, per the Florida Statutes that created the CRA, let us do. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Let me, if I may, if you accept for a moment as a premise my belief that there's hardly anything in here about law enforcement and technology and resources -- law enforcement infrastructure, would it be fair to say that you'd prefer to see more done and spent in that area? MR. SCHANTZEN: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Now, my next question has to do with what are being called complete streets. You're familiar with that concept? MR. SCHANTZEN: Yes, I am. COMMISSIONER FRYER: There were some pictures in the consultant's report, and pretty much in each case the -- to create the complete street will involve taking geography away from automobile lanes. Now, on some streets in East Naples that could be a very good idea and could promote the objectives that we're all seeking to promote, but in others I think it could create some serious issues: Traffic congestion being greater, safety hazards. If you do have more pedestrians and bikers in close proximity to automobiles, that's worrisome. Now, I agree -- Mr. Eastman's gone, but I agree with his point with sidewalks, but the pictures that we saw are pretty elaborate illustrations of bringing automobiles and pedestrians and bicyclists in close proximity. What is your view of having more complete streets in this area? 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 25 of 52 MR. SCHANTZEN: Nothing happens in a vacuum in this. I've been involved -- I've lived in this residence for 30-plus years, and I've been to the neighborhood meetings as a resident during the process of wanting to do different things. They take the community's input and adjust; in other words, they're not just going to simply come out and say take 41 and choke everybody off on 41 to do this elaborate plan. That wouldn't fly with the residents, and so it's unlikely that it would move that much further ahead. And on the same point, when it's decided that we want to look at something down a dead-end street of doing, say, your sidewalk or your swales and stuff like that, in coming through and redoing all your swales with sidewalks and everything on some of these dead-end cul-de-sac streets, you're actually taking away the character of that street. So the amount of foot and bicycle traffic that you get on a block long going down to a cul-de-sac or a dead street with no access to nothing else down there except other residential streets, putting in a sidewalk is kind of like just put a sign at the end saying "sidewalk ends here," which doesn't make any sense to anybody, and I really wouldn't want to see one of those signs on my street saying -- the government telling me that the sidewalk ends here. I think I could figure that out. And that's the same thing with choking roads down -- like thinking of going from four lanes on Bayshore down to two lanes. Well, that won't fly because the residents don't want it. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Let me follow up on that point, because that was exactly the street I was going to mention next. Is it fair for me to assume, then, that you and your neighbors, property owners down there, would not like to see the consequences of complete streets on the heavier trafficked streets? MR. SCHANTZEN: No. Well, you when use the term "complete streets," it's kind of an all-encompassing thing, because what you end up with actually is a modification for that area that you're looking at, taking into consideration other things. One of the things they're doing now is Thomasson down there towards the pickleball courts and stuff and with a roundabout going in. And this whole process has taken a very, very long time to get to, and that particular street or area needs a lot of help and a lot of things taken into consideration to get there inclusive of the pickleball courts becoming the world, you know, focus. So all this information comes in to help design what you're trying to accomplish, and taking a particular street or a particular thoroughfare, it's going to take a lot of input from the public and from the residents in that area and input from the Transportation Department and everybody else before everything comes to fruition. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Are you going to be able to stay around for a while, sir, because I've got more questions? But I think the lady behind you, maybe I should ask some of her as well. MR. SCHANTZEN: You want me to go over to the side? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Unless somebody else wants to ask you a question. COMMISSIONER FRY: May I ask a question also? You said you've lived in that area for 30 years? MR. SCHANTZEN: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: What trend have you seen in terms of -- we're talking about the conditions of blight. What trends have you seen over the last 18 years since this initial current CRA was implemented in terms of improvement? More the same? Has it gotten better, worse, or stayed the same? MR. SCHANTZEN: Oh, could I tell you stories. I could tell you stories after stories, from the start, from the day I moved in to now. Positive, continuous. We have our dips because we get different times of year and everybody else comes and they bring their relatives to stay in the woods and stuff. So, I mean, it's Whac -A-Mole. They're playing Whac-A-Mole, you know -- I mean, that's just the nature of the beast, and what it is is coming up with a solution to solve the beast, period. But I have seen, working with the CRA, your local Sheriff, Code Enforcement, the different departments, absolute -- and the commissioners, working with the Board of County Commissioner people, positive, very much positive improvement. But the people that we're dealing with have learned they have constitutional rights, and we have to bring 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 26 of 52 our combat to a different level within the realm of the law, because now some of those tools that these people had are no longer useful, and being creative in that aspect besides with the arts and stuff like that. We're being very creative there. We need some of the energy on the other thing, too. COMMISSIONER FRY: So you're joining the board, the CRA board, correct? MR. SCHANTZEN: Yes, I am. COMMISSIONER FRY: So how do you look at this document, this vision statement? Do you look at this as a menu and a charter that then facilitates your efforts to be able to choose what you want to do and prioritize that and come back through the process to effect change? MR. SCHANTZEN: Yeah, and also some of the things that we get focused in here that we would like or should or could do, I can understand needing the process to go to the Land Development Code change, stuff like -- things that need a little bite to it regulatory-wise or pattern-wise to narrow it down towards where we want to go. I look at the document as it's a moving piece of paper, moving document, and when it was created in 2000, the document was -- original document was created in 2000, it was created by a lot of people with a little background in the area that -- now there's a lot of people with a lot of background in this document, that through the process -- because I actually sat in the audience through public comment while this document was being made as a nonmember and watched the process and watched the input from the community in order to update this document. So the original document was a good document to start with. The CRA is good towards what it was accomplishing, but the priorities of the people and stuff like that, the committee members dictate what happens in the CRA, whereas, I mean -- and then they bring that up to the Board of County Commissioners and stuff. And you guys are reviewing the idea, so to speak. COMMISSIONER FRY: Is there anything glaringly missing from this vision in your opinion? MR. SCHANTZEN: Glaringly? COMMISSIONER FRY: Yeah. MR. SCHANTZEN: Like you say, there's areas where some things are spoken only a little bit of, but being mentioned is as big part to me -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Is enough. MR. SCHANTZEN: -- as -- I kind of look at it as marketing. Sometimes you market this because you think that's where everything wants to go, but you mention and give courtesy to this. But just the mere mention of courtesy of this gives you the right to go there. COMMISSIONER FRY: Gotcha. All right. Thank you. MR. SCHANTZEN: All right. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. Thank you. MR. BOSI: The next speaker is Donna McGinnis. MS. McGINNIS: Good morning. Thank you for the opportunity to be here. My name's Donna McGinnis. I'm president and CEO of Naples Botanical Garden. And we just wanted to be here today to thank you for the investment of time in taking a look at the Bayshore CRA proposal, the plan that you have in front of you for the budget to develop this plan, for a process that really listened to those of us who live and work around the area, and to our colleagues on the CRA advisory board, a group that's worked really hard and gained a lot of citizen input to put it forward. So a lot of people have invested a lot of time in it, and Deborah for her leadership, and the county's staff, too. It really has been an impressive process and one that we're excited to see happening. On Bayshore, we have really engaged businesses and organizations. Obviously, we have really engaged citizens that live there, but I think those of us that are running businesses or organizations are very collaborative. We've excited to see something like this, and it gives us a framework to work with each other. So, you know, we want to send business to each other, we want to build the economic impact of Bayshore and the good that it can do, and this really helps us to do that. At the Botanical Gardens -- so we're very different than what is in the original plan when we were on the 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 27 of 52 other 17 acres. So just as a reference point right now, the Botanical Garden this year will reach attendance of about 250,000 visitors, we've got an annual operating budget of $10 million and more than 100 staff. So we really are proud of that, but we also realize we're an anchor in Bayshore. Having a plan like this is going to be helpful to us as we strategically look at our next investments in programming for the citizens, in capital developments that we do on our campus, on the next things that we want to do to serve the county, to serve the city, to bring visitation into our area. So having something like this is going to be helpful as we go forward and strategize how the Garden is going to continue to grow. We expect our audience to continue to expand, but what we want to make sure we're doing is -- what we're doing is doing it in a way that is really going to leverage an add-value. So thank you again for taking a look at it. We're very supportive of it and excited to be part of it going forward. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Thank you. Is there anyone else that wanted to -- okay. MR. SHERMAN: My name is Mike Sherman. I'm a member of the advisory board. I'm a resident in the area, actually in Windstar, but I'm also somebody who has, as a retired real estate executive, taken on a -- call it hobby -- somewhere between hobby, philanthropy, and business to create a series of homes on one of the streets in Bayshore. So I've had kind of an interesting time working my way through understanding the political side of this as a member of the advisory board but also living with trying to develop individual small homes in the area. Al said, it's a mix of different things. A lot of focus has been taken on complete streets. Complete streets to me was a way of focusing on bringing upgrades to an area. The blight issue in this case is that 18 years ago -- by the way, the CRA has invested relatively little during these 18 years because of a 10-year recession. If you think about how the money has developed in this thing, the recession had a huge impact. There's been very little money flowing from the CRA in the last 10 years. And only in, really, the last five years have we had real success, and most of that success has come because the CRA has focused the activity in the area and shown a vision of what could be. Businesses like mine building homes, like Rebecca Maddox's retail enterprises at 360 Market and now the Celebration Park, the food truck park. The CRA has been very important to us in an aspirational sense. But if you were to go to Rebecca and ask her how much money the CRA has put directly to her, it's, you know, probably a quarter of 1 percent of her investment of time and money and so on. But it has been very important that there was a commitment by the government and by the neighborhood to make itself something different and better and special, and that's affected me greatly and, in fact, we're having success. Some of your comments concern me because success has a way of saying, okay, well, you've had enough of your success now. We really are just beginning to have that success. And if you dig under the obvious pieces of the success and you look at a report like this, they'll take a picture of one small success. One of my homes was in there. It's a somewhat atypical structure in this neighborhood when you go down there. It's more than somewhat atypical. It's quite atypical. So as we're having these little successes, if you go down there yourself and walk these streets, you won't have any trouble finding blight. You won't have any trouble finding the problems that Al runs into. These neighborhoods underneath are still struggling with economic distress and various types structures that are unsafe and worn out and so on, and the neighborhood needs this focusing power; so one of my points, I guess, that I felt compelled to speak on. The other one is kind of the idea of streets and what you brought up about cars and pedestrians and streets. And on Bayshore itself, our biggest problem, frankly, is it was -- Bayshore is designed as a highway. It's not a highway. It shouldn't be a highway. It should be a village center. And it shouldn't be a place where people go fast. But with a street that's designed with four lanes, two each way, people travel at 50 miles an hour on that. That's not a safe way to travel. We don't have that heavy a level of cars on the street and probably never will. And to the degree we make a highway out of it, all we're doing is opening up a highway for the residents of the 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 28 of 52 Isles of Collier Preserve, 1,500 homes that's right adjacent to us, to use that street as another way of getting to 41 or downtown and to go fast; and all of us go too fast on that street because of the design of the street. So there's some real needs to kind of try to look at that area as to what it is evolving into, which is another neighborhood in the urban center of Collier County and a kind of unique and different one. So I hope you will look at these documents as somewhat aspirational but also understand that there is an evolution happening, but it is a long way from being some kind of roaring success. It is exciting to us, and we will spend a lot of time focusing on those successes. But go down on those streets and see what this idea of conglomerating people into a focused idea is hugely important to getting this place to be what it can be. That's my point. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Thank you. Anybody else? MR. GUTIERREZ: Good morning. Maurice Gutierrez. I'm currently the chairman of the advisory board. I've lived on Bayshore since '78, so the changes are always positive. The challenge of when you use the word "blight" is, I think, a little bit misconceived because when you use the term "mobile homes," you think of a mobile home community like Moorhead Manor. It's gated. It's a community. But what we have endured through non-zoning compliance over the years is we have actually 40-foot-by-90-foot lots with mobile homes from the '50s across the street from C5 commercial warehousing. Now, that's really difficult to find anywhere else in the county other than possibly Immokalee. Again, those are areas that were initially developed so long ago, then they went to sleep. In the 18 years that I've been involved with the CRA as a member, everything to the north has been developed, yet nothing in our neighborhood has. So you've got to ask, how can that be? That's easy. All that was vacant land. Much easier to develop vacant land than to redevelop. So in the years we've been trying to eliminate blight we go in and buy certain properties that were identified by the Sheriff's Office as drug havens; buy the property, demolish the site, and hopefully give an incentive to a developer to bring in something current. If this would not have evolved, I would tell you Bayshore would be a very different place today. Bill Neal initiated the CRA concept with the commissioners back when he created or helped create the CRA, and that vision played through because of -- those who were here will recall; Bayshore was one lane with a wooden bridge. I noticed a concern about streetscapes and complete streets. There has been an attempt to reduce Bayshore to one lane, and I'll tell you the community, as they have always done at our meetings, let us know, as well as I feel the same way, that's going backwards. We're not going to reduce traffic by increasing density. We're not going to reduce the flow of people by allowing more development. But to one of your questions that was asked about, show me an example of where increased density has changed our areas. Look at Mattamy Homes; they're currently building, developing in a site that was dilapidated rental housing, which was called Cantamar (phonetic). It's got nice lakes. We're not happy it's gated but, unfortunately, we can't control properties that we don't own. We do own mobile home lots that have been purchased for redevelopment, and we try to work with developers, but it's really difficult when they're busy elsewhere in the county. Particularly in the last 10 years, as was mentioned earlier with the financial impact, we were really hurt. I will note that the previous commission was more in favor of disbanding us than supporting us. So I'm really happy to work with the current commissioners because they don't share that vision of, oh, God, the CRA's not working, let's get rid of them because we need the money, and that's ultimately what it was. We've tried to be really cost conscious with the dollars that we have spent. And despite the individual infill properties that we have bought to eliminate blight in those areas, the two big ones were the Triangle and the 17 acres, which we are continuously focusing on developing. And I think those will be our signature pieces. But I will say that in the redevelopment of our area, we have found it's more important to make sure we get it right than hurry up and do it. Because the way it was was wrong, and we're trying to correct that wrong within the existing rules, Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan, and sometimes it's really 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 29 of 52 difficult to tell the developer, oh, you know, we can offer you an incentive to build on a small lot. Oh, but, by the way, the guidelines won't let you build anything. But, come on, give us ideas. So that whole redevelopment challenge is constantly with us. And until you get away from the main street and look at where the dead-ends go and what's there, you realize, unfortunately, for our neighborhood, how neglected property owners have profited and ignored the full-time residences (sic) that occupy our homes. But the other challenge is everything there was built before the '70s, pretty much. On my personal street, which is only 16 lots in length, on -- that's a dead-end, it's water access. My home was built in '68. There's a home that was built, cost 1.3; so the diversity is there. But also, we have really nonconforming code issues, because on my waterfront street, we have three lots consisting of 16 efficiency units that is a cash cow for the owner. We have tried to get him to come on board, change what he does because of the availability of the waterfront and, yet, all they're interested in is to rent by the week, skate paying taxes, claiming they have a six-month-plus-one-day lease, and it's really difficult to battle that kind of engrained mentality. And I have found by chairing this board and being on the committee how many residents come out to us at our meetings to say, I need help, I need assistance, I need a way to alter what's going on; where if we wouldn't be here, I don't believe there would be very many positive changes on Bayshore. As far as main Bayshore is concerned, there's a reason Pelican Bay Boulevard is two lanes -- is four lanes with a median. I like to think we're the same way, because it really makes a statement. And I don't feel the property owners or our board would ever consider reducing that four-lane to two, because that's kind of going backwards for accessibility. And we know the growth is in our backyard, because there's nothing left to the north. So we are now front and center and in a microscope, and hopefully we're setting the stage for investors to come in with ideas that are going to benefit our neighborhood. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Vice Chair, question. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I want to ask you, sir, about bicyclists and pedestrians. It's sort of demographics kinds of questions at present. Who are the people who are riding bikes now? Are they people who are commuting to work? Are they kids going to school? And what about the pedestrians? Who are they? And what are the age groups? And do you find -- this is a compound question, I'm sorry. But do you find that the commercial interests in that area are being as well served by bicyclists and pedestrians as they are or would be by automobile traffic coming in to patronize the stores? MR. GUTIERREZ: On your first point, I think it's very diverse from pleasure, retirees, workers. We see it, unfortunately -- we have taken the steps, I think the only neighborhood in the county that actually designated a painted bike lane. We worked with FDOT on that, and we're very familiar with when we attempt to do something, the county's position of we're not an FDOT road, but we want to follow FDOT standards. Having said that, the redesign of Thomasson will include a designated painted green bike lane for bicycle/pedestrians but, as you can ask the sheriffs who attend our meetings every month, everybody uses the bike lanes in the opposite direction, which is hazardous for drivers, but fortunately maybe 90 -- maybe 80 percent of all our streets in our district -- and I'll speak more on Bayshore than the Triangle -- are dead-ends. So owners that live there are aware of this. So it isn't that we have a constant flow of traffic out of the side streets that would then lead to more accidents and a safety issue. I'm personally very familiar, when you pull out, you better look right to see the guy going the wrong way. And it's a battle I don't think we'll ever win, but we try to designate the area for bicycle commuting by doing the FDOT standard of the bike lane. COMMISSIONER FRYER: In your experience down there -- you're really an expert in that area -- if there were more bikes and fewer automobiles, how would that serve the business interest; poorly or well? MR. GUTIERREZ: I think it's going to increase both pedestrian and bike traffic, but it's going to improve 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 30 of 52 in a way where, as development comes in, I'd just as soon, from my house, walk to Celebration Park and, shortly, to the new brewery than drive, because it's a couple of blocks away. Bicycling, the same way. But we have really not been able to capitalize on the commercial district. Again, old neighborhood, small lots. The CRA this year took the initiative to buy a vacant lot on Bayshore to turn it into a public parking area so that these businesses that are projecting to come here won't be turned away because the Growth Management Plan says you need X number of parking, and they now can't meet that because of the square footage of the property. So we hope to continue allowing those new businesses not to be restricted that way and give them the opportunity like the City of Naples has done with their parking garages where businesses can take those parking spaces as parking credits and allow development to occur. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That's all the questions I have, Chair. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Anybody else? (No response.) MR. GUTIERREZ: Thank you. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Thank you. Anybody else like to speak or -- (No response.) CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. So we want to go through this document; how about section by section? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm fine with that. I think we -- my questions went all the way through section -- to Section 4, and if we want to start at Section 5 then -- CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Section 5 is what we'd be -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- and go through page by page, we can ask questions. I think Section 4 is clear that it's the old -- it's the original Immokalee plan which is never -- it needs to be updated, so that's an issue. But we'll address that when we discuss voting for the approval. So I would recommend we start at Section 5 and just go page by page. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Section -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I guess to make it clear -- CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: -- 5.0. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm on the -- we can go by the plan page or the packet page. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Plan page. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Plan page, okay. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: So that's 5-E-1 to start Section 5, executive summary. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No questions. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: First page, and the next page is a map. Then there will be another conceptual plan diagram. Is there anything? COMMISSIONER FRYER: My first question is going to come at Page 5-E-6. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: My first question is 5-E-9, so 5-E-6. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER FRYER: First of all, I guess this is more for the consultant than staff, and it has to do with projected costs -- well, costs -- let's take it at large. How much money is in the till right now? I take it that 1999 was the base year for the TIF. How much money has been accumulated to this date? MS. FORESTER: I have to get that pulled up. I know the current year TIF that they received in 2018 was 1.5 million, and it has gone up and down over the course of the last 17 years, because their first TIF came in in 2001. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Do we have a total? MS. FORESTER: Yeah. So the total that they've received is $20 million. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. So that money is in trust? MS. FORESTER: The money has been spent. So in the redevelopment plan, you can't just keep it. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Twenty in and 20 out? MS. FORESTER: Basically. We have some in reserves in escrow to assure that we are paying off our 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 31 of 52 debt that we have accumulated. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Now, the budget, was it like 60-something million projected out; is that a correct number? I'm trying to do this from memory. MR. JOHNSON: For the entire 30 years? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yeah. MR. JOHNSON: The 30-year period? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I think that's -- yeah. MR. JOHNSON: I think it's more than that. MS. FORESTER: I think it's 1.4 million -- or 154 million. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. So that's -- that is, what, the present value projected out, or just dollars? MR. JOHNSON: Those would just be dollars. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Now, of that amount, the 150 million, how much of those dollars are noncapital costs? MR. JOHNSON: Let me get my calculator out here. All right. So there we go; better. I pulled up my table here. So the total noncapital costs that we had put in the budget for the 30-year period was $69 million. COMMISSIONER FRYER: So 69 of 150 something. MR. JOHNSON: Of 154-. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. And the balance would be for capital projects. MR. JOHNSON: Uh-huh. COMMISSIONER FRYER: All right. I saw about 15 or 20 different iterations of these costs throughout your document, and they weren't identical. MR. JOHNSON: Okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: They were largely consistent, but they were not identical. And so it seems to me it would be a good idea if we had one iteration that you cross-referenced or repeated, if necessary, so that we could see what that was. And on it -- I mean, a lot of it was what I would call soft costs; master planning, staffing, marketing and communications, funding, public art funding, other noncapital costs that -- so if you look at the nature of these costs, to me the amount seems excessive, and I would suggest strongly that we re visit that and redirect more of the money to the capital costs, if possible. MS. FORESTER: I just also want to clarify in those soft costs we were just talking about neighborhood focus initiatives. So any community policing activities, staff time that is addressing additional code enforcement, that could all come out of that. That also includes grants that go to the residents and the business owners within that community in order to improve the blighted conditions. COMMISSIONER FRYER: You might want to reword it then. But just the way it's been presented, it seems to me that an excessive amount of money has been set aside for what I would call soft costs. But if you're including law enforcement money or lighting or technology or things to improve on that, I think this would be more presentable if it were referenced in here; at least it would for me. MR. JOHNSON: May I also make a point? Back to your earlier, the actually pre-break discussion, one of the -- probably the largest expenditures within the noncapital side has -- really fits within probably what you were mentioning about validation. Because this is an aspirational document which provides a menu of potential options and directions, ultimately anything that requires validation or detailed planning is going to need to be funded, and so that detailed planning, that design, you know, that analysis that needs to occur in the future would have to be undertaken by the CRA, or at least the CRA would like to be able to undertake that, so that's why we set aside a significant amount of money over time for those purposes, whether it be transportation, complete-streets related safety, any of those items as well. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Understood. My personal opinion, and that's all it is, would be that I'd like to see more study done to support where you're going to be recommending complete streets, a study that isn't generic but a study that has to do with the actual street in question, whether it's Bayshore or Thomasson or another street, because, you know, I think it's fairly debatable, particularly when you can see it -- and I believe you 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 32 of 52 have -- that complete streets is going to result in more congestion, that there has to be a positive tradeoff that you're going to be getting in return for accepting -- MR. JOHNSON: Absolutely. And a couple points would be there is one street that was noted as a potential to reduce lanes, and that was Bayshore, and that's the only one within the plan document that was part of a recommendation that said a reduction of lanes, actual travel lanes. And as has been mentioned by some of the folks who spoke today, Maurice and others, that is very much something that, from further discussions as we've -- even through the plan development process, is nothing -- if it ever occurs, is not going to occur anytime in the near future. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, I agree, and there was -- there was a difference of opinion, legitimate differences of opinion expressed by the speakers. So I strongly suggest that when you come in, if the recommendation is complete street for Bayshore, that it be supported by empirical information that deals directly with conditions on Bayshore. MR. JOHNSON: Absolutely. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Of what the consequences, intended and unintended, would be. MR. JOHNSON: Absolutely. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. My next question goes to 5E7, and that is the first place where Windstar is referred to. And as Commissioner Schmitt mentioned, I, too, was startled when I saw a suggestion that the redevelopment area be expanded. It seems to me that Windstar should be pulled out of the area; that it should be potentially contracted. Because of success that's been achieved, that would be a place where I think we could pat ourselves on the back and say, you know, that's not a blighted area anymore and should come out. MR. KLATZKOW: Except that when you start taking out the prosperous areas of a CRA, you wind up having no TIF left. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Oh. MR. KLATZKOW: Think of -- think of a TIF almost as an investment fund where you're trying to take the money, invest it in an area, have that area now no longer be blighted, but then you're taking the income you're capturing from that area, from the TIF, to then go to another area in the CRA and bring that area up. Now, sooner or later, if you follow that, the entire area will no longer be blighted and you will no longer need the CRA. But if you start taking out the areas that you've already expanded economically, you financially handicap the entire CRA. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I understand that. My only question, though, would be that if we were to extend this for 15 years or 30 years, would the more affluent neighborhoods, then, just continue to be, you know, well, frankly, burdened with the tax? MR. KLATZKOW: There's not an additional tax. COMMISSIONER FRYER: But it's a set-aside for the area, so I guess they would -- MR. KLATZKOW: They're not burdened by an additional tax. MR. EASTMAN: They're actually benefiting -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, the rest of the county is burdened. MR. KLATZKOW: Yes. MR. EASTMAN: But their immediate neighborhood is being improved right down the street, and their neighbors -- their neighboring properties are being improved, so they're actually benefiting. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I get that concept and -- CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: It's actually -- if you've lived here for 30 years -- I don't know. Did you ever see Kelly Road? COMMISSIONER FRYER: No. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Well, you would understand and you wouldn't be questioning so much, I don't think, if you do, because it wasn't a nice place. It was full of prostitutes and drugs and one -lane road. The reason why this started in the first place is because of Windstar. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yep. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: They wanted the area improved. They wanted the road. They want the 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 33 of 52 landscaping. This is something that they wanted changed. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'm not taking a position on it. I was just looking for explanation, and I think I've gotten that. My next question is on Page 5-E-9, but you want to go first, Joe? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. My question on 5E9 under Section 5, Windstar, you tabbed this sentence, complete streets MSTU improvements along major community roadways. Those roadways that are cited are not part of Windstar. Now, they're the -- they impact Windstar because of the approach to Windstar. MR. JOHNSON: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So what's the intent of identifying it under that -- under Windstar? MR. JOHNSON: Well -- and, frankly, from this particular section where you're talking about -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And that does correspond to the map above it. MR. JOHNSON: So Windstar being a master planned community that has its own private infrastructure within the development itself, there weren't any discussions necessarily about putting CRA money on to making improvements within Windstar itself, but going to that idea of the value added of making sure that the entries, the roadways, the commercial district and all of that leading to Windstar was improved, that was what that was discussion about. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. I think you just need to clarify, because that sentence really should be under 6 and just say -- and just clarify. The intent, just as you said, this is -- the major objective for the Windstar area is to make sure that the streets approach into Windstar are what you want in the CRA to promote economic growth and development or redevelopment. Just a comment. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mine, on the same page, is just a request for a status report, and perhaps Mr. Bosi would be the best one to ask. With the mini-triangle and Davis, there were two segments there, the Triad project, which I guess has gone back to square one, and then one -- was it the Starkey interest -- that came before us. Could you bring us up to date on those two segments? MR. BOSI: They are currently in agreement in terms of access to the property, which there was a debate over. But right now they are in the process of evaluating whether the Trio project would be subject to a floor area ratio. There's an appeal that's currently being processed by the county. So right now both of those projects tend -- seem to be within a holding pattern from moving forward until some of these other questions in terms of applicability of some of the zoning regulations are sorted out through the process. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Thank you. I then go to 5E10. No, that's been answered already. Never mind. And my financial questions on 5E11 have been answered. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm up to 14, so I'll defer till 14. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. And that question has been answered. Oh, reference on -- I guess it was -- well, on 14, but go ahead, Joe. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: My only question, I did not recognize the term "Naples Steel." Was that a former site of Naples Steel, or is that an existing facility? MR. JOHNSON: That's the former site that is now -- I don't remember -- Woodgate Suites Hotel, I think, is what that was. So it's referred to as the Naples Steel site in the previous plan, the 2000, and we talk about how that's now been redeveloped in this new -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I would just clarify in this that is no longer Naples Steel, because I think they're relocated, if I recall. MR. JOHNSON: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And I came here in 2002, so I just didn't recognize the site. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I go to 5-3-37, so... CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Do you have anything else? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: The next page, the town center, of course, a significant issue there with 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 34 of 52 the Gulf Gate Plaza. You just discuss all those. The only issue I have is where it says entertainment center and Haldeman Creek. It's the 60 (sic) Market, need for commercial parking has emerged as an issue. I have to question how did 360 Market get approved without the sufficient parking? I mean, sort of the -- we have requirements for development. That's a rather new development, and it's very limited parking. COMMISSIONER FRY: You mean Celebration Park? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No, it's called 360 Market. COMMISSIONER FRY: That's the restaurant to the south of Haldeman Creek. The food truck park is called Celebration Park to the north which has very limited parking, which I know that's a site that's very limited in parking. But 360 as a restaurant has its own full parking lot. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Adequate parking? MR. JOHNSON: Yeah. COMMISSIONER FRY: But Celebration Park is just the new development just north. It has eight food trucks. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, it says, need for commercial parking has emerged as an issue in this area. So are we talking about the restaurant, then, or -- CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Food truck. MR. KLATZKOW: We're talking about the food truck park, which has been far more successful than originally thought, so it has far more traffic needs than was originally planned for. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Lots of traffic. MR. BOSI: And just as a sidenote, this commission will be hearing a parking exemption for an off-site parking lot for that food -- for the food truck park in the future. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. We have -- clearly have clear requirements for parking requirements in redevelopment, and this now is saying we now have to add additional parking for something that -- 360 is a new market, is it not? MR. JOHNSON: Yes, it is, and they do have a new parking lot. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, you cite here that it needs parking. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: It was a restaurant before. It was the Tipsy Seagull. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That was the tipsy Seagull, right. (Simultaneous speakers speaking.) MR. JOHNSON: I think in general we're speaking more generally for that area, and there are, you know, as new commercial developments are coming in, some of them may be reusing existing buildings with existing parking lots without doing a full redevelopment of an actual building. And so in those instances, what we're suggesting is that we know that as a commercial note this is becoming a challenge and that the CRA should be more proactive in helping to address it. And I think that's one of the reasons why they're working on a parking lot right now. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: All right. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I go all the way to 46, Joe. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: That's a good number, 46. COMMISSIONER FRYER: 5-3-46. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm on Page 17. Just a general statement, and I didn't -- I know you lay out under Bayshore Drive landscaping there is an MSTU. MR. JOHNSON: Uh-huh. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And I believe in the plan -- I'd have to go back and look -- that you clearly delineate the revenue -- MR. JOHNSON: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- supported the MSTU versus the CRA. MR. JOHNSON: Right. And that's very much something that -- I mean, last, I don't know, a month ago, I think, there was a joint meeting between the MSTUs and the CRA advisory boards, and there was this 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 35 of 52 discussion about, you know, coordination. And throughout this plan, what we realized is that, from public involvement and stakeholder discussions, there's a lot of shared interests, of course, between these different entities. And so, ultimately, we're not necessarily saying the MSTU's going to do anything. We're just saying that there is this revenue source and that the CRA and the MSTU should definitely coordinate to share those revenue sources because the MSTU has in its purview to make some improvement that would also be consistent with what the CRA could do. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. And the MSTU clearly is a -- they're a self-tax -- they're taxing themselves -- MR. JOHNSON: They're taxing themselves. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- to support the streetscape and beautification. MR. JOHNSON: Uh-huh. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. I think that's an important distinction. MR. JOHNSON: Absolutely. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. We're five -- Section 5-1, and I'm paging through this. That's a lot of background. Just a general statement, 5-2-1, the Gulf Gate Plaza and town center, significant issues, of course, for redevelopment, but that -- that's, again, enticements in locating someone who's going to invest in coming into that property and redeveloping it. MR. JOHNSON: Absolutely. And just as a side, we talked to the owner of that plaza as well to kind of discuss their model and how they're doing and what their vision might be. So that's going to be a longer-term conversation, as it's been since 2000. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: On Page 5-2-2, unsanitary and safe conditions, disproportionate lack of plumbing. Can you explain, is that a code issue? Is it -- it's not the lack of sufficient fire-suppression issues, but this is a lack of plumbing. I mean, do we have structures there that are deemed uninhabitable because they don't have sufficient plumbing? COMMISSIONER FRYER: It's hydrants, isn't it? MR. JOHNSON: So there is an issue of -- first of all, this is word-for-word taken from the original finding of necessity, so it's not necessarily something that we determined ourselves. This was from the ori ginal founding document. However, there is an issue of -- particularly on some of the residential streets, the fire-suppression issues. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, I understand that issue. MR. JOHNSON: So that would fit into a plumbing issue of -- that the CRA can invest money in, and they have been coordinating with the City of Naples on that. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, I would call that more of an infrastructure issue, but okay. MR. JOHNSON: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: The next statement, poor drainage of local roads. Of course, I think that should be a priority of the TIF and, you know, that's something -- both a priority of the TIF, but it's an issue throughout the county in regards to stormwater, stormwater management. MR. JOHNSON: Uh-huh. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Just a general statement. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Anything else? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm paging down through. I'm all the way to page -- I mean, there are -- in some of the pages you continue to cite affordable housing. I just want to make sure you're consistent in your thoughts. I'm not going to get into that. Page 5-2-7, this is -- again, were initiatives of the 2000 plan, which you cite. You talk about streetlighting and traffic calming, park connections. These are all still standing requirements, are they not? Wetland and flooding considerations, of course that's a requirement. Any structure there now has to meet FEMA standards and base flood elevation requirements. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 36 of 52 (Simultaneous speakers speaking.) MR. JOHNSON: Yes. I think the issue here is just to say that based on, you know, these neighborhood focus initiatives from the 2000 plan, we -- the CRA will continue with that type of work throughout the residential communities. There's a lot of discussion about the commercial areas and so forth, but there's a lot of work that needs to be done and a lot of older areas within the residential that you can still invest in, so... COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Next page, Triangle stormwater management. And you make a recommendation that you update the stormwater management plan for the entire CRA. Is there a separate stormwater management plan for the CRA? MR. JOHNSON: There is a master plan that was completed. I don't remember the year off the top of my head. I want to say it was 2006 or 2007. We did talk with county staff a little bit about that plan, and what we agreed to was -- because that plan, while it does serve as guidance, wasn't necessarily something that the county was utilizing to aim projects or target projects. So what we talked about with them was let's revisit that. The CRA should revisit that with them to make sure that it's consistent with their direction now so they can kind of connect those two, integrate those two. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: It's in the appendix. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. I know it's in the appendix. But, you know, this is, of course, an issue in the county. They want to have a stormwater tax. MR. JOHNSON: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: There's sufficient issues with stormwater. One would argue that that should be part of the General Fund and funded -- it's a political decision. MR. JOHNSON: Sure. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But the CRA can certainly tax itself to solve this problem. Of course, it's -- you would have to -- or the -- you'd have to create an MSTU or some other entity to solve the problem which, again, puts the burden on the property owners in that area, or you make it a priority of the CRA to fund it. MR. JOHNSON: It is. The way we have framed it in this document is we have set aside money for the purposes of completing the updated study, and that would be in much more coordination with the county, public works folks -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Stormwater. MR. JOHNSON: -- stormwater folks just to make sure that we are all on the same page with the types of projects we need and where those projects are and get updated cost estimates. But I do think it's the CRA's intent to -- wherever possible to try to find funding, whether it be through TIF or whether through -- they've been using CDBG. We've done grant applications to make stormwater improvements. That's something the CRA staff has been doing. Now that there is some more TIF and there may be -- there hopefully will continue to be actual TIF on a regular basis, that money will be available for those types of improvements as well. So I think it's a question of coordination first with the county to make sure that you're on the same page with the folks who are actually spending the capital dollar. And if there are things that the CRA can be doing and they can agree to after working with the county, then the CRA can step up and make those decisions and spend that money. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. Then it will become a decision. Because you'll compete with everybody else in regards to this -- (Simultaneous speakers speaking.) THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry. You guys are talking over each other. I can't get you when he's talking. MR. JOHNSON: Go ahead. I'm sorry. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You'll compete with everyone else in regards to the stormwater -- MR. JOHNSON: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- priorities. If you want to solve the problem, you can solve it separately and tax yourselves to fix the issue. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 37 of 52 MR. JOHNSON: Or through the use of TIF funds or grant applications or other funds that might be available, yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. I'm up to 5.3. I don't know, Ned, if you have anything. That's Page 5-3-3. I'm toggling through. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: He doesn't have anything till 5-3-47, so... COMMISSIONER FRYER: Forty-six. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, man. Okay. Let me go down there and see. All the rest of the stuff is good stuff here. Page 5-3-14, just Strategy 1, and it says "innovative land uses." It says, "Coordinate with Collier Growth Management and Zoning Divisions to pilot innovative land uses." And the bullets down below, those are all the -- what you believe we need to do for innovative land uses. MR. JOHNSON: Some potential ideas for innovative land use and zoning strategies, I think, is what we were referring to. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Flexible parking regulations. Is that -- MR. JOHNSON: Could that be something that -- you know, maybe there's an off-site parking lot or something like that to ease the burden of an individual use versus having to provide all the parking on site, if that's available. And those would be regulations that would come back to you-all in the future. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. These are all -- would be -- MR. JOHNSON: Things that could come -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- definite impacts on the LDC or GMP, especially consideration within the coastal high-hazard area. Ned's all the way up to 47. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Six. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: On Page 24, design treatment and attributes. It just talks about the major gateway intersection and, of course, it discusses the MSTU. Again, that's -- you're implying there coordination with the MSTU and funding for the various improvements. MR. JOHNSON: Absolutely. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. No other comment there. Page 528, I have a real problem with the statement, expansion of the CRA area to include -- the parks to the east should also be evaluated since it may facilitate making connections and other improvements. I would say, why not just extend the CRA all the way down to Collier Boulevard? You know, it's -- this is a general statement saying not only do we want to keep the CRA, not only do we want to extend the lifetime of the CRA, now we want to expand it. MR. JOHNSON: And there was a discussion -- and I think this language -- and there's probably one other place in the plan where it was mentioned as a possibility for consideration in the future of potential expansion, and that was something that came from discussions with the advisory board, not to just include the parks, but maybe some of that residential to the east as well. And all the plan does related to that is say you should consider -- it should be put on your list of potential things to talk to the Board of County Commissioners about in the future. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. That's a political decision. MR. JOHNSON: Right, absolutely. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I just -- I mean, it says -- and you show pictures of the pickleball site and some of the others, and it's sort of -- again, my statement is, I could say I want to extend it all the way from Radio Road to down to, whatever, to 41, and all the way out to Collier Boulevard. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Well, I think that was more to connect Sugden. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah -- oh, I understand what they're doing. They want to connect Sugden, but... I'm on Page 33. Streamline and clarify the development process. There's a second bullet, relationship of various applicable codes to each other: LDC, fire code, and building code. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 38 of 52 MR. JOHNSON: So there have been a lot of discussions within -- whether we're talking to staff or stakeholders throughout the process that -- particularly as it relates -- less to, say, building code, fire code, more to the Land Development Code and, particularly, how the overlay works. There's still a little -- it's still a little ambiguous in the wording as it exists today. And there has been some confusion just as to which rules apply when. And so all we're saying there is if and when you come back with any type of specific regulatory recommendations, that -- make sure that we try to clarify the language as much as possible as to which code or rules apply at what geographic location and when. Because the overlay does allow flexibility, which is great, but also for somebody who doesn't spend a lot of time in -- you know, working in Collier, it is a little ambiguous, and you can interpret it in a lot of different ways, so... COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's an issue with every development in the county. You have the LDC, you have the fire code, which is a state code, and the building code, which is a state code. MR. JOHNSON: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So you understand that. MR. JOHNSON: And I would say most of the -- truthfully, most of the issues brought up during this -- the conversations we've had had to do with -- actually within the plan in the code itself, so there would be things that you might have purview over because you do have the overlay. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: The fire review is now an integral part of the -- MR. JOHNSON: The site plan review and -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- site plan review process. When I was in the county, it was controlled separately, but now it's part of Growth Management. MR. JOHNSON: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I have to assume it's improved the process somewhat; I hope. That was a big issue. The next Strategy, 2, of course, dedicated staff. Is there a -- does the CRA get priority in review process? I can't remember. Is there some -- any kind of -- like if it -- like, we have expedited review for affordable housing. Does CRA get expedited review as well? Is there something in the code? MR. BOSI: There's no specific fast-track program for a CRA review. If it met one of the qualifications for -- you know, for affordable housing then, therefore, if it was in the CRA, it would still gain that. But there's nothing specific to the CRA where they gain any priority in terms of reducing reviews times. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But in the next sentence they say, establish a formal role for the CRA in the development review process. You're adding another step. You're -- MR. JOHNSON: Oh, yes, correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Now you're asking the CRA -- is that the CRA board? Advisory board? MR. JOHNSON: Or just staff, right. So we feel that this is something that -- and when I return -- well, one of the times when I return to talk to you-all, in April we'll be talking about some of the more specific observations that we see in the code that we think that you may want to consider revising in the future, right? A little bit more detailed. So, kind of, this is your generalized statements, and then we're going to come back in a few weeks and say, and this is what we meant from a more detailed -- but nothing to pass, just recommendations in our review. So, ultimately, there's been a -- there's been a lot of discussion about what is the role of CRA staff in the review of a site plan or a development; is it -- they don't have a formal seat at development review as far as, if it's a rezoning they don't -- you know, they don't provide comment. They often do -- are provided the site plans themselves, and they do comment at some level, but it's not a formal part of the process. So we think that's important to iron out a little bit more, because I think whether it's the CRA staff just getting a designated person from, you know, Growth Management to be designated to CRA issues. Maybe that's something to add to somebody's job; not to add anything to somebody's job, but -- or maybe it's, hey, how do we get CRA staff more engaged in certain types of projects. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 39 of 52 COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But the overlay will clearly define review requirements, whether it's in the LDC or other criteria. MR. JOHNSON: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I just bring up the point, if you're going to have someone in the CRA review this -- MR. JOHNSON: It could add -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's been done informally in the past. It's usually -- MR. JOHNSON: It still is. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- meeting with the CRA informally, and then it goes through the submittal and review process. MR. JOHNSON: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: If you -- if that's what you want, that's fine. It's just -- it's just another step. So it's -- MR. JOHNSON: Understood. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's not a -- it adds not to expediting the process. MR. JOHNSON: I didn't say it was all -- there weren't any conflicts in some of the recommendations but, yes, that is one that definitely needs to be ironed out, and we just want to make sure it was recognized. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: On Page 34, Strategy 5, you, again, evaluate concepts of expanding the CRA. Just clarify -- ask that you -- make sure you clarify to the Board that that's a thing you want to do. The other issue is going -- under Strategy 5, impact fee offsets or payments over time. Been an issue discussed throughout the county, and it's just a good thought, just that there are legal issues. And my days in the county, we used Tindale Oliver for our impact fee studies, and you understand the legalities. MR. JOHNSON: I'm pretty sure you still do. Not me personally. But I'm pretty sure they're still involved. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. And there are legalities issues in regards to the dual rational nexus and all the other things, okay. And I am all the way down to page -- we're moving along here. Page 40. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, still me. Under the mobile home upgrade program, this is under Strategy 2. And under the SHIP, just so the other board members clearly understand, there's not what you call a lot of money in the SHIP program, and it's a pretty competitive process. I'm looking at -- I'm trying to read my notes here, if I can -- MR. JOHNSON: And I just wanted to clarify those are existing programs that we just wanted to make sure that you understood they're out there. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, yeah, they're out there. MR. JOHNSON: Yeah, by the county. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And there's a lot of competing resources. And I believe this year there was only a total of about $1.8 million and probably 50 to 60 applicants. Everything from mortgage assistance, homeowner assistance, SHIP. That was only $400,000. So those -- it's not going to -- the SHIP is not going to solve the problem. MR. JOHNSON: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You're going to have to subsidize -- and then just for the members of the public, you're going to have to subsidize that with other -- other -- with TIF, because the SHIP is fairly competitive, and there's a committee that reviews and then recommends to the Board. Because you have here, coordinate with Collier County Community and Human Resource Division for mobile home upgrade and replacement which would -- again, would be part of the SHIP process. MR. JOHNSON: Sure. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And it's going to be a very limited amount of money. MR. JOHNSON: And I think we've had multiple conversations with them regarding -- just to get a better 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 40 of 52 understanding of how they do what they do and as well as their, you know, housing master plan that they've been working on and all of that. And I absolutely agree with you, I think there's some approaches that they use that even if SHIP dollars weren't involved, maybe the CRA could actually follow some of the ways in which the housing folks have done their work, because they've got processes in place, they've got vendors that could help with some of those, you know, how to improve a mobile home or replace it or something like that. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, it's simply an application process. They identify the SHIP money, and it's an application process, and you compete against everyone else in the county asking for this limited amount of money in SHIP. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. I think we're almost to you, Ned. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: What page? CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Forty-six. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, we're cranking. I'm past 46 already, so go ahead, Ned. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Thank you. On Page 5-3-46, .11 at the bottom at the left references this road diet concept, and it ties in directly with complete streets. It's my understanding that the proposal of complete streets now is only going to be consider it for Bayshore; is that right? MR. JOHNSON: I mean, that's it -- that's the recommendation for any of these streets at this point is we, specifically in their noncapital recommendations, ask -- basically say that before any decision's made, a study should be done, as you mentioned, to make sure that it is a legitimate approach and it doesn't cause more issues with traffic or whatnot. So it is a recommendation, and it would need to be studied further before any action was taken. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I thought the focus had narrowed down to Bayshore, but there are other streets that you would be considering and looking at? MR. JOHNSON: Not specifically for lane reductions. Bayshore's the only one that would be reducing. Now, a complete street, though, could just be like what we said on Linwood which is same lanes but we've got room to put in a sidewalk, we've got room for some streetlighting, those types of improvements, which are different than taking a lane. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. Well, I guess -- maybe I'm repeating myself, but just to make this record, you know, for any street that is to be put on a diet or made complete, there should first be a careful study of the reference to impact to residents, to businesses, and automobile traffic as well as public-safety issues, bicyclists and pedestrians, and those are just the ones that I can think of, because you could make the situation considerably worse. I just -- with respect to this lane diet thing, a situation that had evolved in the City of Naples was that there was a city proposal to have a lane diet on 9th Street North, the North Trail, running from the four corners up to the beach hotel golf course, and the residents were totally in opposition to that for a variety of reasons. So it was taken off the table, but then FDOT has come back in, so I'm told, and they may be proposing to do that themselves, overriding the city. And I don't know whether that could also happen in the county on the East Trail, but I think that would be a very bad situation. MR. JOHNSON: Understood. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mike, do you know of anything of that nature? MR. BOSI: I know the Florida Department of Transportation is moving forward initiating a complete-streets program trying to promote the concept where it can. So in regards to anything specific, I don't know, but I do know that they have initiated, within the past year, a renewed commitment to trying to implement the complete-street policies where applicable in the various jurisdictions throughout. They're out meeting with the municipalities, counties as we speak talking about this initiative and what's going to be coming from it, but I don't have any specifics as to, you know, where it would apply. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I guess if FDOT takes it over, there's probably nothing we can do about it, but I believe -- 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 41 of 52 CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: It's their road. COMMISSIONER FRYER: -- it would lead to a horrible result on either the North Trail or the East Trail, in my personal opinion. MR. JOHNSON: I was just going to say, if that's okay, as far as DOT's process moving forward -- I don't work for DOT, but I have had conversations with District 1 regarding their program, which is -- Collier's included in. Ultimately, what they're going to be looking for is what is the -- if the community is coming to them wanting a certain type of treatment, then they've started to develop a process to evaluate their roads in a different way that may allow for some of those changes. So, ultimately, they've got this new process. It's a new way of looking at roads. But they don't -- at least in my discussions with them, they do not want to do something that the community has not put a plan together and said we really would like to do this, so -- at least in my conversations. I can't speak for -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: In the case of the City of Naples, they are well aware that the city fathers and the residents opposed it vehemently. MR. JOHNSON: I can't speak to that case. Just more generally. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. I go, then, to Page 56. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah, I'm on Page 56 as well, but go ahead. COMMISSIONER FRYER: The Strategy No. 1 at the top says alternative transportation methods: Golf carts, electric shuttles, other neighborhood electric vehicles, shared and/or automated -- autonomous vehicles, waterbound. I mean, is this realistic in the near term or even in the intermediate term? MR. JOHNSON: Well, I mean, I certainly think that things like the electric carts, the circulator carts, are realistic in the near term. I mean, that's something that's already happening in downtown Naples where you can call them, they come to you, they pick you up, it's free or it's a minimal charge, and it can take you between key places downtown. COMMISSIONER FRYER: So this would be something that would be like CAT? MR. JOHNSON: I wouldn't say it would be like CAT. This is usually a -- and at this point, as far as I know, CAT is not running any of these types of service, but it would be like an on-demand circulator. COMMISSIONER FRYER: But it would be offered by the county as opposed to private people buying government carts and electric? MR. JOHNSON: I would say not necessarily. Usually the way it's -- and if you want to go ahead and speak to that. MR. BOSI: I was going to say, normally those are run by private initiatives, and those initiatives, they provide advertising and different things while those people are on those shuttles, and that's how they help fund those initiatives. MR. JOHNSON: But they would be approved through that local government. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That's all I have on that page. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But they would be fully DOT compliant? MR. JOHNSON: Yeah. If they're going to -- they have to be -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah, licensed and all the other requirements. MR. JOHNSON: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Down in Objective 3, and this is under Strategy 1, improved parking. We talked about that. But reduced design requirements for parking. Just, again, be careful what you ask for; just so you know what you're asking for in parking garages. MR. JOHNSON: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Bold issue. I guess the going price today per space is somewhere between 15- and $20,000. MR. JOHNSON: Up to 30-, depending on where you're at, yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Per space. MR. JOHNSON: Yeah, absolutely. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 42 of 52 MR. JOHNSON: And I think, again, this will be -- this may be a code issue, depending on -- it's just something for consideration because of the uniqueness of some of the properties in Bayshore. Maybe you could provide more parking if you didn't have the same landscape requirements in Bayshore as you did elsewhere; things like that that you may want to look at that you can get some more spaces out of some of these smaller lots. So that was generally the intent. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Next page -- this is a contentious issue. The transportation concurrency exemption areas, and this is a statement -- exception to meeting transportation concurrency standards. Again, be careful what you ask for. Residents clearly need to understand that when we exempt traffic requirements, they're going to put up with traffic congestion. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Amen. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I don't know how else to say it. I mean, we have traffic concurrency. We've implemented checkbook concurrency. We have all these things, and if -- one of the most contentious and hot issues in this county is traffic. And, of course, it's not like the East Coast, I mean, but people here who have been here for a while -- so be careful what you ask for. MR. JOHNSON: Well -- and our reference here was to the existing policy that does exist, and we were just stating that the CRA would be -- in many ways, their strategies reinforce some of the strategies that are in the TCMA now. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: But they are very controversial. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Very controversial. MR. JOHNSON: I could understand. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Page 58, proposed design for narrower travel lanes. I understand clearly what you're asking for and required -- just clearly that when this does take place that the residents clearly understand the impact that this is going to have, and it may reduce the speed on Bayshore, I mean, really. Just a visual thing, but there are other unintended consequences as a result of it, so... Okay. I'm on Page 59. We already talked about stormwater building design. Okay. Then I'm up to 61. This is a repeat -- coordinate with jurisdictional government, but this is a repeat of the stormwater master plan. You've talked about it. It's clear. I just need -- again, stress the interface with the county staff as what you're stating here, and, of course, it becomes competitive with all the other funding requirements. That doesn't say that you can tax yourself to solve some of the problems, but that's an issue. Strategy 5, placing utilities, underground, again, another issue. Always -- that's been discussed for years in the county; just incurring the cost and who pays for it. MR. JOHNSON: Absolutely; right. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Do you have any more? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I have a couple more. The first of the two is at Page 5.5.1, so I have nothing up to that point. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: What page was that on then? 5.5 -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: 5.5.1. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm breezing through here. Just to understand, under -- on Page 5 point -- or 5-4-5, the note that you are, in this plan, asking specifically for the TIF fund to go out through 2060, 42 years, the plan. I don't understand this now. You want to extend it 30 years out to 2048, but you're asking for TIF funding out to 2060? MR. JOHNSON: Let's see. Well, okay, so -- and this would be something that probably needs to be clarified in the language. So the 2060 date is the statutory maximum. That's the sunset date in the statutes now, which is it's a 60-year maximum for the CRA to exist. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MR. JOHNSON: But any given modification can only extend 30 years. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: All right. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 43 of 52 MR. JOHNSON: So we're asking for the 30-year extension and, ultimately, you could go all the way out to 2060 from the statute's perspective. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MR. JOHNSON: So that needs -- I will clarify that a little bit, though. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Just make sure you clarify that then. Thank you. On Page 5-4-7, last bullet there on the page, I already talked about it, but the commercial parking garage on Bayshore. Again, planning the site, identifying, and identifying the costs. You say, Ned, you're on 5-4 -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'm at 5-5-1. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Dash 1. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. The -- 5-5-1, you -- at the end of this page you interrupt yourself in mid sentence to insert a table, and the table consists of three pages, and then you pick up -- you pick up on -- finish the sentence on Page 5.5.5. Is that really what you meant to do? MR. JOHNSON: We probably can move that around a little bit and -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: It seemed like a non-sequitur. MR. JOHNSON: Yeah. I wouldn't call that an intentional thing. I think that was just a formatting snafu. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Then I do have some substantive questions. I think they're my last ones on 5-5-5. At the top, under 5.5.6, neighborhood impact, multimodal transportation, as of right now there is housing available at lower income levels yet this may be due to lower structural quality based on findings from the background analysis for the redevelopment area plan. As improvements are made in the area, there is a potential risk of property values rising to make housing substantially less affordable. I think this is a point of concern. And let's take, for instance, the mobile home people, I guess, in south Bayshore. MR. JOHNSON: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Is it your sense that -- and I realize that their structures are more precarious and they're more vulnerable to, say, a hurricane, but the quality of life down there, they're not complaining or in terror or in fear, are they? Aren't they -- I drove through there a few days ago, and it seemed to be, I mean, fairly vibrant for what it was. MR. JOHNSON: I would only say that it -- I mean, it varies greatly street to street. I think that, ultimately, what this was trying to say was, we need to be cognizant of the fact that future success by encouraging new private investment, et cetera, will have an impact -- potentially a negative impact upon them because it may increase development pressures, increase property values, et cetera. So from a -- the statutory neighborhood impact discussion is really about the folks who live there now who may be mal-affected by rising property values, new development. Are we putting strategies in place to address them? And the way we do that is through, we've got grants, we talk about possibly helping with replacement housing, those types of things. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, I'm glad that you raise that, because I think it's a real issue. You might consider placing more emphasis on that tradeoff, because you will potentially end up displacing people and making it too expensive for people to continue living where they're currently living, and both of those things, I think, need to be thought about in the planning process. Then my last comment is this one that I've been referencing before. It's at the bottom left of 5-5-1. It says, "With more urban-style development and multimodal improvements, traffic circulation may change. There may be increased congestion on roadways and at major state road intersections in making them safer for non-automobile modes." Again, I'm glad you raise that. I think that's a very -- it's a very important consideration -- MR. JOHNSON: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRYER: -- that -- I don't believe there's an easy answer to it. And at the very least -- and you've already agreed with me on this, I think. But before we put a complete street in, there needs to 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 44 of 52 be -- particularly one that reduces the automobile lanes and increases the proximity of pedestrians and bicyclists to motor vehicle -- you've got to really look at it from various different perspectives to be sure that it really is the right thing to do. MR. JOHNSON: And I think that any one of these studies will need to address and educate on the tradeoffs. Ultimately, one of those studies on a potential complete street needs to come through the advisory board and others, and we talk frankly about the tradeoffs. Maybe you're providing parking but maybe at the same time you're increasing some congestion, particularly during season. And those tradeoffs need to be discussed, absolutely. COMMISSIONER FRYER: The advisory board is the right place to start with that, because those are the folks who are living down there. I hope we're also going to be part of that process, too. MR. JOHNSON: Well, certainly from any regulatory change you would be. I would leave the rest up to staff. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Or Land Development Code. MR. JOHNSON: Or Land Development Code or, yeah, GMP changes. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Those are all the changes I have. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: On -- at the end of Paragraph 5.5.6 on that same page, I would just add words there where you cite water-quality impacts, "can be evaluated through existing" should be "state, federal, and county process," because you have Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. You have water quality certification requirements -- MR. JOHNSON: Management district. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- under the ERP, Section 402. So there are requirements that -- and just -- it just is not the county. MR. JOHNSON: Sure. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: The state and feds are clearly involved in that. I don't think -- I know in the next section you go in great detail on TIF and graphs. All that is clear. I don't think I have any other questions. I know that's -- CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Amazing. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- amazing, but... MR. JOHNSON: This is my first time in front of the Planning Commission, so you'll have to tell me if that's a good thing or a bad thing. I don't know. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, I took over for Mark today. He always asks all the questions. That's all I have. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. Anybody else? Go ahead. COMMISSIONER FRY: I have some conceptual questions, not so much page by page. MR. JOHNSON: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRY: But Chairman Strain opened the meeting pretty much with trying to clarify why we're reviewing this, what our mission is here today, and it was said that we are here to review to ensure GMP consistency. MR. JOHNSON: Correct. COMMISSIONER FRY: And so I guess this question really is for staff and for our county attorneys. Is the significance of this document, if approved, moving forward, in your opinion, are we, by approving this, committing ourselves to anything that would not be changeable when these specifics come back to us through GMP amendment or LDC amendments? MR. BOSI: No. This is strictly a support document to reference strategies that could be implemented within the regulatory process at a later date. And it's also utilized -- well, not temporarily, but one of the secondary portions of it is really utilized to support grant applications as well, to frame how the area is treating the redevelopment, how one individual strategy will fit within to a particular grant application and how that supportive information is viewed as a positive or another checkoff towards successfully completing a grant application in the individual reviews when they rank them. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 45 of 52 COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. Evan? MR. JOHNSON: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: The specific use of this document significance to the CRA, to the board members that are here moving forward, I mean, I'm -- from the conversation so far and some very well-stated concerns and just issues by fellow commissioners, I'm looking at this -- or my conclusion is that this is really a charter. It's kind of a prioritized roadmap, a menu for your agency board in order to prioritize and decide what is the low-hanging fruit, what do we go after specifically. MR. JOHNSON: Right. COMMISSIONER FRY: And in that respect, you know, I'm inclined to say, you developed it, it looks like a great step forward. So I'm always wondering, you know, to what extent do we just let progress take place versus do we need to air significant concerns and, you know, potentially hold up the process. But it is -- it's a charter. It's a roadmap -- MR. JOHNSON: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: -- correct? It's not a -- it's a nonbinding document in terms of this board and any future options that we might have. MR. JOHNSON: Correct. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. Complete streets has been discussed a lot today. And just in terms of clarification, complete streets, is it simply a holistic way of addressing street design or potential changes to a street that would take into account lighting and safety and pedestrian and multimodal application, traffic flow, safety overall? Is it a mandate for any kind of a specific outcome for how a street is designed? MR. JOHNSON: It is not necessarily -- I mean, it can be a mandate if your county adopted a mandate to do just a certain type of complete-street design. I think your definition, though, is right on with what it is. It's really about a more holistic way of looking at your public right-of-way, your streets, and how can we do a better job of accommodating multiple users, different types of users. COMMISSIONER FRY: Within that footprint? MR. JOHNSON: Within that footprint. COMMISSIONER FRY: Within that footprint? MR. JOHNSON: Exactly. COMMISSIONER FRY: So in the case of Collier County, we have not -- have we adopted a complete streets as a mandate in our street design? MR. BOSI: We have not adopted a mandate towards where every component of complete streets has to be implemented within to our transportation design plans, but we have adopted a provision that we recognize the concept of complete streets and, where applicable, we will apply them to the specific design plans that eventually will be reviewed and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. But moving forward, the CRA board would come up with -- focus on which streets to focus on, work with the county, develop those designs, and it may -- Bayshore was the only street that actually had a -- even a potential for a reduction of lanes, a diet, so to speak, but that would all still be subjective in the future as to what makes sense for a given road segment? MR. JOHNSON: Absolutely. COMMISSIONER FRY: Correct. Okay. Funding, I'm curious how with these funds that come in through the TIF, the MSTUs, how exactly is the decision made on how to allocate the funds, what to spend the money on? MS. FORESTER: We have a work plan that we bring forward to the Board usually on an annual basis, and we're leaning towards looking at it in a five-year time frame. So the Board of County Commissioners, sitting as the CRA, approves the budget every year, and then they also approve -- every time we have to go through procurement at those certain levels, we follow the county standard procurement process. COMMISSIONER FRY: But the recommendations all are the product of the CRA -- 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 46 of 52 MS. FORESTER: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: -- board? MS. FORESTER: The advisory board reviews our work plan, they make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners, sitting as the CRA, who has the ultimate authority to spend the dollars. COMMISSIONER FRY: So, in effect, the neighborhood itself -- I mean, this area itself is really promoting the top-priority changes according to what's important to them at the time -- MS. FORESTER: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: -- within the program? Okay. Another funding question. When a road improvement -- now, let's say Bayshore is having changes made to it. You know, we've spoken about how the TIF funds come off the top of the General Fund so that, you know, anything additional above the base from 2000 now goes into the TIF -- this trust fund, let's say a project is done on Bayshore. Normally it would have been done with county funds, General Funds, I would assume. Now you've got CRA funds and you've got county funds. How is that project paid for? Is it a sharing of those funds? MS. FORESTER: The statute does state that if there's anything already in the adopted capital improvement projects that the county is paying for, TIF dollars can't be used to circumvent those already approved capital projects. COMMISSIONER FRY: Cannot or -- MS. FORESTER: Cannot. In the adopted plan as of today. But in the case of -- let's say Thomasson Drive where we are now working on a major project there, we are adding to above what the county normally did. So we're putting in a roundabout, we're putting in the sidewalks. So all of those are being paid from the MSTU, who is doing that. In the future there may be some additional partnerships with the CRA and the TIF. So we're really providing maybe additional services or in the fact we want to do something before it happens at the county basis. Paving roads; we've got a whole list of roads in the Bayshore area that need to be resurfaced or brought up to county standards. The CRA may choose to say we would like to do that now because we want it done sooner than what the county's rotation system would provide. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. Very helpful. We've spoken a lot about the 17-acre parcel. I didn't see details in the plan. I just was curious, what exactly is that property now, and what potential top-priority uses are there for that parcel? MS. FORESTER: Evan did an extra piece when he was doing this on the 17 acres to get public input. We actually did a survey of the community. I think we had over 900 people respond to the survey and what their top priorities were. So we definitely saw sort of a shift from doing a residential-intensive development there to something that was going to provide more open space, the connection to Sugden Park. Some type of performing arts or cultural facility was also identified there. We also saw that they were more interested in what the outcome would be as opposed to the price we receive for that property. So right now we are going to be having continued conversation with the Board of County Commissioners sitting as the CRA at our joint workshop on April the 2nd and hopefully have some discussion on what we will do next. COMMISSIONER FRY: Is that all undeveloped land currently? MS. FORESTER: Yes, it is all vacant. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. The Haldeman Creek entertainment area, does that encompass -- it's shown on the map, but I would assume that encompasses Celebration Park, 360 Park, and then some areas to the north and south? MS. FORESTER: And the other side of Bayshore. So we have some vacant properties right there by the bridge. So those we know are currently, I think, recently purchased, so there will be some new activity going there. So that Haldeman Creek entertainment district was identified in 2000. So now we're seeing it as coming about, and so we're working strategies to make sure it can be implemented correctly. COMMISSIONER FRY: So it's ways to take advantage of the unique nature of having the waterway 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 47 of 52 going through that area? MS. FORESTER: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. I saw earlier in the -- one of your early slides, rectilinear block design. I wondered -- I'm not quite sure what that is. I wonder if you could clarify. MR. JOHNSON: I said that in one of my sides? Let's see. COMMISSIONER FRY: And if it's not important -- I know it's not critical, but I don't know if that implies some kind of architecture specifically. MR. JOHNSON: No, no. Yeah. What was that? I'm sorry. MR. BOSI: No. It's just -- it's your classic grid, rectangular blocks that form a grid -- (Simultaneous speakers speaking.) COMMISSIONER FRY: A grid structure, a geometric -- okay. Thank you. You -- there was mention of character areas, and so I wondered if you could clarify the importance of -- characterize these different areas. Let's say, like, different kind of neighbors that you want to apply their own individual zeal and flavor, but what is the significance of those when it comes about to GMP amendments, LDC items that might come before us, if any? MR. JOHNSON: Well, I think, ultimately, when we identified the character areas, we saw this as -- with the exception of Windstar, which is -- we've kind of talked about as a unique place. We saw it as places that could be emphasized in any future LDC or GMP amendments. If you think about to the north in the Triangle, you've got a Shadowlawn district, which is really this residential core, and it has specific land-use pressures and development pressures and issues that would need to be addressed with, and we want to make sure that if you're going to think about updating your code, that maybe we focus, hey, you've got 41, you've got the triangle -- the mini-triangle going on. There's going to be a lot of pressure. There's going to be a lot of transition issues. There may be some specific regulations that you want to put in place in those areas. So that's generally how we address the character areas. Another one would be down on Bayshore just talking about -- something that came up again and again and will need to be addressed in any type of code update would be the fact that, yeah, you don't have a lot of depth. You've got small commercial parcels, and yet you've got this demand now for some restaurant and entertainment and things like that that will have a bit of a parking demand, that may need a little bit more of a footprint, more developments like the brewery and less, you know, tiny, small restaurants over the future. So you may need to address that in how do we allow for further transition or maybe a little bit more depth in certain areas. So that's kind of how we approached the idea of the character areas. COMMISSIONER FRY: So it's not so much a look and feel of that neighborhood. It's adjacent geographic, contingent geographic areas that really have similar characteristics that you want to apply -- MR. JOHNSON: Correct. COMMISSIONER FRY: -- a holistic planning approach to each area; is that it? MR. JOHNSON: We basically looked at based on parcellization, based on current uses and said, you know what, this is kind of your -- this is how the character areas kind of pan out. In moving forward, you're going to need to think about how the plan and the code address these specific areas and make sure that you're protecting the things that you want to protect and you're encouraging the thing you want to encourage. COMMISSIONER FRY: There was mention of five-year reviews at some point in your presentation. MR. JOHNSON: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: Have those been conducted since 2000, or is that a future concept that they will start to be conducted every five years from now on? MS. FORESTER: I don't believe there was much review over the 18 years to actually look at where we were. So that's why we put it into that plan, because we do think it is important so we continuously improve the document. COMMISSIONER FRY: I would agree. I think 20 years is -- a lot of changes happen in 20 years. Five would be much better for a fine-tuning horizon, I think. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 48 of 52 MR. JOHNSON: And I would just add to that, the nature of your redevelopment plan with two chapters, four and five, related to two different areas. If you think about five years, it's much easier to make smaller edits versus, you know, remove and replace. I think that's going to work a lot better from an operational standpoint. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. I might have one more. Let me just check. That's it. Thank you. MR. JOHNSON: Thanks for your time. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. Deborah, go ahead. MS. FORESTER: I was just going to say maybe for clarification for where we are hoping to go now is we heard the comments about the density issue on the mini-triangle as far as consistency with the current Growth Management Plan, and then we heard a number of concerns that you had for clarification for understanding of the impact that the fiscal piece will have, as well as the complete streets. So I'm wondering in your motion today if that would be to have the plan consistent with the two changes that was referenced by Mr. Strain before he left and then a comment sheet that we can bring forward to the Board on your other concerns and comments. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. We're just -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: I remain -- sorry. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: We're just being asked to determine whether this is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That's -- CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: And we have had all the comments, and I guess they've made a list of them. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, I don't feel comfortable being constrained in that way. I don't know about Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, I don't know how we can vote on this being consistent with the Comprehensive Plan when nothing in the Chapter 4 is consistent with what we went through amending the Immokalee Master Plan. That's my confusion. I'm asking to approve something that is consistent. I guess it would be consistent with the existing Comp Plan. MR. WEEKS: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: The Immokalee Master Plan, which will eventually amend the Comp Plan, you'll have this come back and amend the entire Chapter 4? MS. FORESTER: Yes, or parts of it, whatever it needs to be. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So for all intents and purposes, Chapter 4 is consistent because it's consistent with -- CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: It's not changed. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- with the current plan. MS. FORESTER: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well, am I the only one who is uncomfortable limiting us to conformity with the Growth Management Plan? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, I mean, I have issues, but they're all political issues. And the statement to extend the CRA time frame is not part of the GMP, is it? I mean, it's a goal. It's in this plan. So if I say yes to this plan, am I actually consenting to agree that the CRA dates should be changed? MR. KLATZKOW: You are welcome, in part of your motion, to say that we are in disagreement with extending the plan. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's what I asked. Okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: My concerns -- if I can be more specific, and Commissioner Fry mentioned, this, the charter or the roadmap, I think, is what this visioning document becomes. And one interpretation of a charter is it's sort of a senior document or a document that you would then use to address the more junior documents. And I'm concerned that something comes back that -- where you would say, well, this was in the vision plan that you approved, and so we're just trying to implement that now with changes to the GMP or the LDC. I know I've spoken a fair amount today about my concerns, and I guess to the extent that anybody wants 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 49 of 52 to know about them, they're a matter of public record, but I would rather they be dealt with now and see if we can't come up with a motion that deals with them. And my concerns -- and let me just state them. Mark has his concerns that he stated. I'm also worried about the fact that we'll lose hold of this document the way the progression has currently been recommended; that, indeed, the CRA advisory board will get another look at it, which is a good thing, but as far as we're concerned, we're going to be done with it under the current staff recommendation, I believe. And I think it needs -- I think it does need to come back to us on some of these points. For instance, I think the concept of law enforcement has been shortchanged in that consultant's report. The very first speaker made a good -- made some good points about indigence, vagrants, drugs, crime, and the like. And so to me that points up a need to identify and make expenditures in the area of law enforcement. So I think there needs to be a little more emphasis, if not initial mention plus some emphasis about needs for law enforcement in here. The complete streets and road diet matter, I think we've come to a meeting of the minds, at least orally today, but before any street were narrowed or in any way changed that would -- in a fashion that would likely bring about more traffic congestion or closer interactivity, automobiles, pedestrians, bicyclists, you've got to look at the impact of that, and there has to be a study that is specific to the street, not something that's pulled out of a textbook of general application like we see with these traffic impact st udies, but something that would say, okay, in the case of Bayshore we've looked at this, the impact to residents is going to be this, the impact to businesses is going to be this, the impact to automobile traffic will be this, and public safety for the bicyclists and pedestrians has been analyzed, and we believe the impact will be this. Also, the soft costs, the nonstructural or noncapital costs, I think that could be -- I think you could go back to the drawing board on that and, for instance, throw in some more about law enforcement and also more clearly specify that before a complete street were authorized, there would be this study and there would be a soft cost associated with that study. And, finally, I agree that the 30-year extension is too long. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: So you want it to come back with changes before you -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: I do, but if -- I recognize that if we vote 3-1, it's not going to go forward, and I'm not prepared to do that at this point. If I don't have any other support up here, I've made my record. If, you know, anybody wants to adopt these points, they can, but -- so my question is, is there any support from my fellow Planning Commissioners to bring this back? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Make a statement. My only concern -- well, not my concern, but the issue here is, do we find it consistent? This is not GMP language. MR. JOHNSON: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Anything out of this will come back as an amendment to the GMP and subsequent LDC. MR. JOHNSON: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I have to conclude that the plan was developed by the residents; it was recommended and supported by the residents. I would make a motion -- and we'll see where this goes. I'll make a motion that we find it consistent with the GMP subject to the following exception: That the plan not be extended, that it stay as written, and so it will sunset in 2030; is that correct? The CRA would sunset? MS. FORESTER: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: A 30-year, or is it 2029? MS. FORESTER: It was adopted in 2000, so it would have a 30-year -- MR. JOHNSON: I think it's 2030. MS. FORESTER: 2030. It was adopted in 2000, so 30-year time frame, so that would be in 2030. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I think it's too early to make any type of a recommendation to extend it. That can be done five years from now, because there is a significant fiscal impact, and that is a fiscal impact associated with loss of revenue to the General Fund. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 50 of 52 So with the exception of the statement that the Board approve or at least that the goal that says that the 2019 amendment will extend the term of this plan to 2049 as allowed in Section 163.387(2)(a) Florida Statute, I do not support that extension, but from regard with the plan, other than the issues that Ned brought up and that has been brought up by other commissioners and myself, I think we've given you clear guidance. I would make a recommendation subject to the statements I just made that we consider it consistent with the Comp Plan with the understanding that any amendments will be coming back certainly as Comp Plan amendments and related to Land Development Code amendments. So that's my -- CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Motion? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- motion. COMMISSIONER FRY: I'll second it to move it forward, and then I'd like to make a comment, if I may. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. Go ahead. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That is, staff is -- staff and the consultant are to be commended for working so closely with the CRA advisory board, and that's the main reason why I'm not going to stand in the way of this thing moving forward. And I can support limiting our recommendation to the fact that it is consistent with the GMP, as the statute requires. I also agree with Commissioner Schmitt that now is not a good time to consider extension. That can be a discussion for later. The final thing I will say, though, is, you know, when these -- when these GMPs -- amendments come back and LDC amendments come back and people stand up in front of us and say, well, now, this is part of the visioning process that you approved, I'm going to remember. So that's all. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: You will. COMMISSIONER FRYER: That's all I had to say. COMMISSIONER FRY: Did we get an official interpretation from our legal team that we do not open ourselves up to that? MR. KLATZKOW: This is an aspirational document. Aspirations change. COMMISSIONER FRY: I would ask, in terms of the time frame, I'm not sure why 30 years was approved in 2000 or why 30 years is now the de facto standard, but what is the -- are there any impacts to limiting it to 2030 as has been suggested here? MR. KLATZKOW: The advantage of increasing a CRA is bonding. So if you have a 30-year lifespan on the CRA, you can put out 30-year bonds. If your CRA is expiring in five years, now you're into the short-term commercial note market. That's the primary advantage of extending it for 30 years. COMMISSIONER FRY: So I'm not an expert in the area of those types of bonds, but is that -- how restrictive is that of the success and the capability of it if we shorten the time frame of those bonds? MR. JOHNSON: Well, I mean, as far as specific bonding, if the CRA decided to do that, ultimately it's a -- how much money -- how much revenue will you have to project to pay off the bond. So it's a timing of if it's a 10-year bond, 15-year bond, which at this point it's a, what, 20, I think, or 15 or whatever. So at that point it's a different -- it's a different ball game. Typically, it really will just depend. I mean, ultimately, you've set in a base year for your TIF collection for your increment collection, and that base year is the 2000. So as property values continue to increase over time, you know, we will have recessions again, things will slow down, hopefully not as crazy as it was a few years ago, but there will be ups and downs. But, ultimately, that base year of 2000 provides you a -- the CRA a significant opportunity to bring in TIF money, you know, and that continues to grow through the course as long as the CRA exists. So whether that's 2039 or '49 that -- or 2060 some day, that would be the primary advantage. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. Well -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I need to amend my motion specifically in regards to the Bayshore/Gateway extension. I have no problem with extending the Immokalee CRA. I clearly understand the need there. So I want to clarify that I don't automatically -- I don't agree with the automatic extension of the Bayshore/Gateway, so... 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 51 of 52 COMMISSIONER FRY: I'd accept that as the seconder. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But I clearly recognize that's a political decision that our commissioners will make, and you certainly can make that petition before the Board. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I have one more comment, too. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Sorry. That is that a very good point was brought up about the bonding cost. And since we're not going to see this again, I hope that when it goes in front of the BCC sitting as the CRA you'll be able to quantify that and tell them exactly what the cost difference is going to be depending upon how long it is extended, because that could be a driver for the ultimate decision-makers. MS. FORESTER: And at this point in time we're not suggesting that we're going out for a bond, but we will raise that issue as one of the reasons why the extension could possibly benefit the area. Right now the CRA has gone under a commercial loan program in order to get the funds they needed to acquire some of the property previously. COMMISSIONER FRY: I echo Commissioner Fryer's sentiments that, in my opinion, I'd just like to see the right decision made on the time frame and don't feel that we have enough information here to know what that horizon should be. So when you go before the Board of County Commission, hopefully you can state your case and lay out things besides bond costs that might affect a judicious decision on how long that time frame is. But I would support the amended motion also. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. There's been a motion and a second. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Opposed, like sign? (No response.) CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: That's it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I would like to commend Terri for hanging in there, because we went 43 minutes past a break. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: It must be because of you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Thank you, Terri. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Okay. We have no new business. No old business. Public comment? (No response.) CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: No. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Move to adjourn. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Motion to adjourn? Second? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I second. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: All those in favor? COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: We're out of here. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) March 21, 2019 Page 52 of 52 ******* There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:43 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION _____________________________________ MARK STRAIN, CHAIRMAN ATTEST CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER These minutes approved by the Board on ____________, as presented ______ or as corrected _______. TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC., BY TERRI LEWIS, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. 5.A.1 Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes (8596 : March 21, 2019, CCPC Minutes) 04/18/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.1 Item Summary: ***This item is being continued from the April 4, 2019 CCPC meeting.*** PUDR PL20180002020: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2009-21, as amended, the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples Residential Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 10± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD; by amending the PUD document to revise a Development Standard Table footnote relating to setbacks; to increase the minimum required preserve area for the PUD; to update the Master Plan to label the additional PUD acreage as a Residential/Golf tract and show additional preserve area on that tract; to revise the PUD legal description; to add a deviation r elating to environment; to modify development commitments relating to planning and environment; and by providing an effective date. The property to be added to the PUD is located just west of Collier Boulevard, approximately two - thirds of a mile north of Immokalee Road, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, with the entire PUD consisting of 1,668.3± acres. [Coordinator: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 04/18/2019 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: James Sabo 04/01/2019 2:09 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 04/01/2019 2:09 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Camden Smith Review Item Completed 04/01/2019 4:34 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Review item Completed 04/02/2019 3:36 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 04/02/2019 4:18 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 04/03/2019 2:25 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 04/04/2019 5:11 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 04/05/2019 12:07 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Review Item Completed 04/09/2019 2:07 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 04/18/2019 9:00 AM 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 57 AGENDA ITEM 9.A.1 This item has been continued from the April 14, 2019, CCPC meeting. Attached is the complete packet. PUDR-PL20180002020: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2009-21, as amended, the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples Residential Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 10± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD; by amending the PUD document to revise a Development Standard Table footnote relating to setbacks; to increase the minimum required preserve area for the PUD; to update the Master Plan to label the additional PUD acreage as a Residential/Golf tract and show additional preserve area on that tract; to revise the PUD legal description; to modify development commitments relating to planning and environment; and by providing an effective date. The property to be added to the PUD is located just west of Collier Boulevard, approximately two- thirds of a mile north of Immokalee Road, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, with the entire PUD consisting of 1,668.3± acres. [Coordinator: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Cover Page-9.A.1-PUDR-PL20180002020-Esplanade Golf & County Club of Naples RPUD-4-18-2019 meeting (8510 : PUDR PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 1 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: April 18, 2019 SUBJECT: PUDR-PL20180002020 ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owners: Agent: Maxine Hatcher and Dawn Hatcher 4190 Broken Back Road Naples, FL 34119 Applicant: Taylor Morrison Esplanade Naples, LLC. 551 N. Cattleman Road #200 Sarasota, FL 34232 Alexis Crespo, AICP Waldrop Engineering, P.A. 28100 Bonita Grande Drive #305 Bonita Springs, FL 33901 Richard Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich, Koester 4001 Tamiami Trail N. suite 300 Naples, FL 34135 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone 10.0± acres of land from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district to be added to the existing Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples RPUD for a 1,668.31 acre project; and, the additional density of 37 single-family dwelling units. The property is comprised of two 5 acre parcels owned by Hatcher. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 10.0± acres to be added to the existing 1,658-acre PUD known as Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples RPUD. The property is located north of Immokalee Road and west of Broken Back Road (future Collier Boulevard C.R. 951) in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (see location map, page 2). The proposed Master Plan is included as Attachment B. AGENDA ITEM 9.A.1 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 2 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 9.A.1.bPacket Pg. 60Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 3 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting a rezoning of 10.0± acres from Rural Agricultural to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for the purpose of adding lands to the existing Esplanade RPUD and adding residential units, and simultaneously reducing the total number of approved dwelling units from 1,233 units to 1,184 units. The applicant intends to amend Ordinance number 14-36, which is the Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples RPUD (formerly Mirasol) to add the 10 acres. Additionally, the developer intends to amend the PUD document to modify the permitted uses, the development standards, developer commitments, and the Master Plan document. The applicant proposes to extend the existing Torre Vista E. right-of-way toward the south and develop the adjacent property, which abuts the western boundary of the Tree Farm PUD and is southwest of the Esplanade east-side entry and exit gate. The Master Plan and legal description are proposed to be updated related to the new boundaries and respective buffer requirements. The required buffers for the amendment parcel are detailed on the proposed Master Plan. The surrounding PUD projects with approved acreage, dwellings units and densities listed here: Addies Corner – 23.33 acres – 250 units – 11.45 DU/A Heritage Bay – 2,652 acres – 3,450 units – 1.3 DU/A Ibis Cove – 96.50 acres – 416 units – 5.5 DU/A Laurelwood – 78.00 acres – 465units – 5.96 DU/A Olde Cypress – 538.1 acres – 1,100 units – 2.1 DU/A Richland – 150.3 acres – 650 units – 3.1 DU/A Terrafina – 637.00 acres – 850 units – 1.3 DU/A Tree Farm – 58.84 acres – 281 units – 4.78 DU/A Woodland Park Sub, unrecorded plat – agriculture/residential uses Esplanade – 1,658.30 acres – 1,233 units – 0.74 DU/A A density map of the surrounding PUD projects and the respective densities for each project has been included as Attachment C. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Vacant undeveloped, zoned RPUD Esplanade Golf and Country Club 0.74 DU/A South: Blue Landscape Nursery, zoned A, Rural Agricultural East: Vacant undeveloped, zoned Tree Farm PUD West: Single-family residential homes, zoned RPUD Esplanade Golf Club 0.74 DU/A 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 4 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 Aerial Map (County Property Appraiser) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The ±10.0-acre subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). A portion of the total Esplanade property (455.5 acres in Section 22, inclusive of the 10.0-acre addition) is designated Urban (Urban-Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict), the remainder of the property (1,212.8 acres in Sections 10 & 15) is designated Agricultural/Rural (Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands), as identified on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The FLUE Consistency Review memo is included as Attachment D. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 5 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Transportation Planning staff reviewed the application and found this project consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). There is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units, and there is no additional traffic generation for this proposed development. Additionally, operational impacts will be addressed at time of the next development order (SDP, SDPA or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, or amendments are sought. Therefore, the subject amendment can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 909.65 acres of existing native vegetation, 545.8 acres of required native vegetation (909.65 acres X 60 percent), and 965.66 acres of provided native preserve (on site). STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. Drainage: The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and/or platting (PPL). Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the RPUD petition to address environmental concerns. The 10-acre addition will result in a 0.8-acre preserve provided within the 10-acre addition. The preservation requirement has been met with 965.66 acres of provided native preserve (on site). No listed animal species were observed on the property. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 6 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 Landscape Review: The landscape buffers depicted on the Master Plan are consistent with the LDC requirements. The buffer types will be based on the type of development proposed at time of platting or SDP. To ensure that the LDC required buffer is provided, the buffers for the PUD extension have been labeled as “Buffer per LDC.” School District: At this time, the school district has not provided a staff report section. It is anticipated that at the time of site plan or plat, the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity within the concurrency service area the development is located within and adjacent concurrency service areas such that the level of service standards are not exceeded. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional water service area and the north wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District. Water and wastewater services have already been established within the existing development, and the petition proposes no increase in residential units. Therefore, the Public Utilities Department has no objection to the proposed 10 - acre addition or to the other proposed changes, which would have no impact on public utilities. Zoning Services Review: Zoning Division staff has evaluated the proposed uses related to their intensity and compatibility. Also, we reviewed the proposed development standards for the project. The Zoning Division also evaluated the location of the project and the potential traffic generation. The proposed single-family residential project is located approximately ½ mile north of intersection of Immokalee and Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) and directly abuts the existing Esplanade PUD. The proposed 10-acre addition parcel is an existing single-family residential house and is part of a nursery agricultural use. Nearly all of the adjacent neighborhoods are zoned and developed as PUD projects and are detailed with densities and acreage in the project description section. The adjacent PUDs were developed with somewhat higher densities but appear visually similar because the Esplanade preserve area is very large. The approved preserve area for Esplanade is 965+ acres. In 2014, the applicant amended the former Mirasol PUD and added 19.7 acres to allow construction of 112 additional dwelling units. The total number of approved dwellings units increased from 1,121 to 1,233 units. The density changed marginally from 0.72 to 0.74 DU/A. Importantly, Ordinance 14-36 required that the 112 dwelling units approved must be located on the 19.7 acre amended parcel. However, the developer, Taylor Morrison, constructed only 47 dwelling units on the 19.7-acre parcel, which they call the “Dillilo” project. The current proposal is to reduce the total number of approved dwelling units from 1,233 to 1,184. The applicant has proposed to amend Developer Commitment G. Planning to construct a maximum of 34 single- family detached dwelling units on the 10-acre amendment parcel. The commitment was discussed at the second NIM on February 27, 2019. As proposed, the density at Esplanade will be reduced and decrease from 0.74 DU/A to 0.71 DU/A. Most of the surrounding abutting PUD projects have similar lower density, although none less than 1.0 DU/A. The exceptions are Addie’s Corner and Tree Farm PUDs. Addie’s Corner was approved at 11.45 DU/A and is directly abutting to the Esplanade parcel. Tree Farm PUD was approved at 4.78 DU/A and is directly abutting the proposed Esplanade 10-acre expansion parcel. There is 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 7 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 somewhat higher density across Immokalee Road. The Laurelwood PUD was approved at 5.96 DU/A, and the Ibis Cove PUD was approved at 5.5 DU/A. While the applicant has requested additional residential units, the density and intensity of the development appears to be reasonable and has been found consistent with the GMP. The applicant has proposed to amend the development standards to allow a rear setback dimension of zero feet from lake maintenance easements. Additionally, the applicant has proposed to amend the Developer Commitments to allow the location of the required 0.8-acre preserve to be approximate, and the location would be determined at the time of Site Development Plan approval. The proposed amendment requires the 0.8 acres to be located within the proposed 10-acre parcel expansion of the PUD boundary. The Zoning Division finds these requests to be reasonable. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: (Zoning Division staff responses in non-bold). 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Zoning Division staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and finds that the uses and property development regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area. The Public Utilities Division further states the water and wastewater services have already been established within the existing development, and the petition proposes no increase in residential units. Therefore, the proposed amendment has no bearing on utility system capacity. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office and demonstrate unified control. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the petition and analyzed it for consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. They have found the proposed amendment to be consistent with the GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 8 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 buffering and screening requirements. Staff finds that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers, including the maintenance building buffer. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. There is no deviation from the required usable open space as submitted. Compliance with approved standards would be demonstrated at the time of SDP. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Compliance with all other applicable concurrency management regulations is required, including but not limited to plat plans or site development plans. The Public Utilities Division further states that Collier County has sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity for water and wastewater service to the project. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. For the proposed single-family residential use, there is adequate supporting infrastructure to accommodate this project, including Collier County Water-Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains. Adequate public facility requirements will be addressed when future development approvals are sought. The Public Utilities Division further states that the area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including Collier County Water-Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate to accommodate the 10-acre addition. The scope of any system improvements will be determined at the time of SDP or PPL permit review. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. There are no deviations proposed in the request to rezone to RPUD. However, there are changes proposed to the list of developer commitments. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 9 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 proposed change in relation to the following when applicable.” Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below: (Zoning Division staff responses in non-bold): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff has determined the petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern related to surrounding properties is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this report. The proposed single-family residential uses will not likely change the existing land use patterns in the area. Nearly all the surrounding PUD’s are developed with a similar residential pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is zoned Rural Agricultural with RPUD residential uses surrounding the property. The application is to rezone to RPUD, which would not create an isolated district. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed RPUD boundaries are logical and appropriate. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not specifically necessary. However, the applicant believes the rezoning is necessary to accommodate the construction of similar style residential housing to that which already exists at Esplanade. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change is not likely to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The existing neighborhood is residential, and the proposal is to expand with additional residential dwellings. However, at the NIM, the attendees stated that they would not support the proposed rezoning to PUDR unless the developer provided a solution to the lack of available parking at the clubhouse and restaurant parking lot. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 10 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 The Transportation Division states that the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. It is not anticipated that the rezone request to RPUD will create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage for this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County environmental staff will evaluate the stormwater management system and design criteria at the time of SDP or PPL. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed rezone to RPUD is not likely to reduce light or air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. Property value is affected by many factors. It is driven by market conditions and is generally a subjective determination. Zoning alone is not likely to adversely affect the property values. Generally, market conditions will prevail. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Most of the adjacent property is already developed as residential use. The approval of the rezone request from A to RPUD is not likely to deter development activity of surrounding property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed rezone to RPUD complies with the GMP and is found consistent, then it is consistent with public policy and the change does not result in the granting of a special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is determined to be consistent with public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning, however, it is 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 11 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 effectively landlocked by the Tree Farm PUD. Additionally, the applicant cannot use the property as they have proposed without rezoning to RPUD and getting approval for the proposed density. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The Zoning Division staff determination is the proposed uses are not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The application was reviewed and found compliant with the GMP and the LDC. The Zoning Division staff does not review other sites related to a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the proposed rezone request to RPUD would require significant site alteration. The site is residential on the north portion and agricultural use on the south portion. The site would be cleared and developed similar to the 2014 rezoning that added 20 acres. The development standards would be applied during the SDP and plat process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project must comply with the criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF) and must be consistent with applicable goals and objectives of the GMP related to adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by Comprehensive Planning staff for consistency with the GMP as part of the amendment process, and they find it to be consistent. The Public Utilities Division further states that the activity proposed by this amendment will have no adverse impact on public utilities facility adequacy. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is not seeking any deviations from the requirements of the LDC. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PUDR-PL20180002020; Esplanade Page 12 of 12 Revised: April 1, 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on December 5, 2018, 2018, and on February 27, 2019, both at 6:00 PM, at St. Monica’s Episcopal Church 7070 Immokalee Road Naples, FL. For further information, please see the NIM Summary information in the backup material. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on April 3, 2019. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Division staff recommends the CCPC forward petition PUDR-PL20180002020 Esplanade Country Club of Naples rezone and amendment to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: A) PUD Ordinance B) Proposed RPUD Master Plan, Esplanade C) Density Map, Esplanade D) FLUE Consistency Review E) Backup Materials Esplanade 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PRI]I'ARED B\': C.J SABO. AICP. PRIN('IPAL PI-ANNER ZO DIVISION ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED B\': R A YI\,{O .B OWS, ZONING MANACER ZONING ISION _ ZONING SERVICES SECTION 3.t{ t1 DATE 3-uz't\ DATE /-l.=7F<i'Zz- 11 MICHAEL BOSI. AICP, DIRECTOR ZONING DIVISION ZONING SERVICES SECTION APPRO\:ED B\': 4-.r--..-- S FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANACEMENT DEPARTMENT DATE -S-7 DATE 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Final Revised Staff Report Esplanade PUDR 4-1-19.docx (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Attachment A. Ordinance - 032619 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) R]G R/G N I B. 6e 3 PROJECT LOCATION MAP R/G V77i SPECIAL NOTES ACREAGE SUMMARY: NATIVE VEGETATION SUMMARY: _-jin; L L Ll EAE TTJIITMTT'rN(it\rfRtN(i l I I l - (L- !L L I q 77ata lt (L/ )nL ) R/G L R/G lL-R/G \ R/G \L?,' IJ (: .t=- I 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Attachment B. Master Plan001 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) A A PUD RPUD PUD A-ST PUD A RPUD E A PUD PUD GCPUD PUDPUD AA PUD RPUD PUDA PUDPUDAA PUD RSF-3 RPUD MPUDAA PUDAPUDMPUDCPUDRPUDRSF-2 A A A ARPUD RPUD C-3 Immokalee RD Collier BLVDLogan BLVD NDocument Path: C:\GIS\Data Request\GIS Request\Density Map\Esplanade Golf and Country Club Density Map.mxd Map Date: 3/8/2019 Growth Management DepartmentOperations & RegulatoryManagement Division I 0 1,200 2,400600 Feet Heritage BayDensity: 1.3 Density: 1 per 5 ac. SUBJECT PROPERTY:ESPLANADE G&C CLUB0.74 d.u. per acre GROSS DENSITY UNITS PER ACRE (UPA)ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB ANDSURROUNDING PROPERTIES (PL-2018-2020) Density: 1 per 5 ac. Allura RPUD Addies CornerDensity: 11.45 Ibis CoveDensity: 5.5 Olde CypressDensity: 2.1 LaurelwoodDensity: 5.96 RichlandDensity: 3.1 TerrafinaDensity: 1.3 Tree FarmDensity: 4.78 Bent CreekDensity: 3.2 Heritage GreensDensity: 2.1RIGASDensity: 3.1 ParklandsDensity: 2.5Quail WestDensity: 0.6 Longshore LakeDensity: 1.77 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Attachment C. Esplanade Density Map (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Page 1 of 4 Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: February 13, 2019 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PUDR - PL20180002020 - REV 3 PETITION NAME: Esplanade Golf and Country Club (formerly known as Mirasol) RPUD Rezone REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting to rezone the entire ±1,658.03-acre Esplanade Golf & Country Club Unified Residential Planned Unit Development (Unified RPUD) and also rezone and add a ±10.0- acre parcel to the PUD. The rezone of the ±10.0 acres zoned “A” (Rural Agricultural District) to a unified RPUD will not allow for the development of additional residential units beyond the 1,233 units, the maximum previously approved, and therefore, the currently approved density of 0.74 DU/A (1233DUs/1658.03a = 0.744) will decrease very slightly with this zoning action (1233DUs/1668.03a = 0.739). The additional 10 acres will be developed with undeveloped units currently available within the RPUD. Submittal 2 modified the Master Plan Exhibit C2 and the application, and now includes an Affidavit of Authorization. Submittal 3 modified the Master Plan Exhibit C2. The petitioner is also requesting to amend the following PUD Sections: B. Development Standards – Remove Footnote 1, F. Developer Commitments – Remove G.2., Revise Legal Description and revise the RPUD Master Plan – including boundary. LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side of Immokalee Road , approximately ¼ mile west of Collier Boulevard, in Sections 10, 15, and 22, Township 48 South, and Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The ±10.0-acre subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). A portion of the total Esplanade property (455.5 acres in Section 22, inclusive of the 10.0-acre addition) is designated Urban (Urban-Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict), the remainder of the property (1,212.8 acres in Sections 10 & 15) is designated Agricultural/Rural (Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands), as identified on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Policy 5.1 in the Future Land Use Element states, in part, “All rezonings must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan.” 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Attachment D. Consist Review PUDR-PL2018-2020 Esplanade (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Page 2 of 4 Staff reviewed the proposed land uses for consistency with the Urban Designation. Adding the ±10.0 acres to the Esplanade Golf and Country Club Unified RPUD for the development of a portion of the maximum 1,233 residential units previously approved with Ordinance #14-36 is consistent with the GMP. Relevant to this petition, the Urban Residential Subdistrict allows residential development at a base density of four (4) dwelling units per acre, subject to the Density Rating System provisions (this portion of the PUD is eligible for certain density bonuses but none are sought or needed to achieve the requested density); recreation and open space; and earth mining and related processing uses. The proposed amendment would increase the amount of the PUD designated Urban Residential from 445.5 acres to 455.5 acres, thus increasing the maximum allowed density on the portion of the PUD located in the Urban Residential Subdistrict (Section 22): Eligible density for property within Section 22 of approved PUD: 445.5 acres x 4 DU/A = 1,782 units Eligible density for property within Section 22 of proposed PUD amendment: 445.5 acres + 10.0 acres = 455.5 acres x 4 DU/A = 1,822 units The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands allows for a base density of one (1) dwelling unit per five (5) acres; golf courses subject to specific standards; and, earth mining and related processing. The existing portion in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District is eligible for a maximum of 242 units: Eligible density for property within Section 10 and 15 of approved PUD: 1,212.8 acres x 0.2 DU/A (1 DU/5 acs.) = 242 units With the requested land addition, the entire RPUD - Urban Residential and RFMUD Neutral Lands combined - is eligible for up to 2,064 DUs. The existing RPUD permits 1,233 DUs. The applicant is not requesting an increase in the maximum number of residential units with the additional 10.0 acres. The proposed PUD amendment would permit 1,233 residential DUs to be developed in Sections 15 and 22. If density blending is not utilized, then the maximum number of dwelling units allowed in Section 22, located within the Urban Residential Subdistrict, and in Sections 10 and 15, located within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, are to be developed within their respective District/Subdistrict. Specific to the Esplanade RPUD, Section 5.1(g) of the Density Rating System allows for density blending between the portions of the PUD that straddles between, and only within, Sections 15 and 22. The proposed PUD amendment seeks to utilize the Density Blending provision of the Density Rating System of the FLUE which reads as follows (each provision is followed by staff’s analysis in bold): 5. Density Blending: This provision is intended to encourage unified plans of development and to preserve wetlands, wildlife habitat, and other natural features that exist within properties that straddle the Urban Mixed Use and Rural Fringe Mixed Use Districts or that straddle Receiving and Neutral Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. In the case of such properties, which were in existence and under unified control (owned, or under contract to purchase, by the applicant(s)) as of June 19, 2002, the allowable gross density for such properties in aggregate may be distributed throughout the project, regardless of whether or not the density allowable for a portion of the project exceeds that which is otherwise permitted, when the following conditions are met: 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Attachment D. Consist Review PUDR-PL2018-2020 Esplanade (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Page 3 of 4 1. Density Blending Conditions and Limitations for Properties Straddling the Urban Residential Sub- District or Urban Residential Fringe Sub-District and either the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral or Receiving Lands: (a) The project must straddle the Urban Residential Sub-District or Urban Residential Fringe Sub-District and either the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral or Receiving Lands; (Condition met. The total project area straddles between the Urban Residential Sub- District and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands.) (b) The project in aggregate is a minimum of 80 acres in size; (Condition met. Condition 5.1(g) specifically provides for Section 15 only to utilize Density Blending. The project lands in Section 15 and 22 total 1,090.1 acres.) (c) At least 25% of the project is located within the Urban Mixed Use District (Condition met. Condition 5.1(g) specifically provides for Section 15 only to utilize Density Blending. Therefore, the cited minimum applies to the aggregate lands of the Esplanade RPUD located in Sections 15 and 22 only. The project acreage in the Urban Mixed Use District is 455.5 acres, which is 41.8 percent of the acreage in those two Sections). The entire project is located within the Collier County Sewer and Water District Boundaries and will utilize central water and sewer to serve the project unless interim provisions for sewer and water are authorized by Collier County; (Condition met. Sections 15 and 22 are eligible for Density Blending and are within the Collier County Water and Sewer District boundaries and subject to the “Availability Letter” issued by the Public Utilities Division at the time of SDP.) (d) The project is currently zoned or will be rezoned to a PUD; (Condition met. The subject petition is for the Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples RPUD.) (e) Density to be shifted to the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District from the Urban Residential Subdistrict is to be located on impacted lands, or it is demonstrated that the development on the site is to be located so as to preserve and protect the highest quality native vegetation and/or habitat on-site and to maximize the connectivity of such native vegetation and/or habitat with adjacent preservation and/or habitat areas; (Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to the Environmental staff.) (f) The entire project shall meet the applicable preservation standards of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. (These preservation requirements shall be calculated upon and apply to the total project area. Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to the Environmental staff.) (g) Section 15 (Township 48 South, Range 26 East), which straddles the boundary of the Urban Residential Subdistrict and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, is designated Neutral, and is in the approved Esplanade RPUD, may utilize this density blending provision, subject to the above criteria. (The existing Esplanade RPUD Conceptual Master Plan Exhibit “C2” – and the proposed Master Plan for Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples - depicts development only in Sections 22 and 15, and thus density blending would be utilized for properties located in Section 15.) 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Attachment D. Consist Review PUDR-PL2018-2020 Esplanade (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Page 4 of 4 FLUE Policy 5.6 (shown below in italics) followed by staff analysis in bold text. FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition.] FLUE Objective 7 and Related Policies: As the existing RPUD was recently reviewed and the proposed additional acreage is very small and only proposed to continue to develop the previously approved 1,233 residential dwelling units, staff deemed it unnecessary to review FLUE Objective 7 and related Policies regarding Smart Growth principles. CONCLUSION This rezone petition may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section PUDR-PL2018-2020 Esplanade PUDR R3.docx 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Attachment D. Consist Review PUDR-PL2018-2020 Esplanade (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 1 of 11 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s)______________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant/Agent: _______________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: __________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. To be completed by staff 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 2 of 11 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to the ________________________________ zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________ Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________ Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: •If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; •The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and •The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use Other: ________________ RPUD 1123 3 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 3 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 4 of 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade G&CC of Naples RPUD PL2018002020 Evaluation Criteria Page 1 of 5 ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD EVALUATION CRITERIA PUD REZONE CONSIDERATIONS (LDC SECTION 10.02.13.B) a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The RPUD is currently approved for 1,233 dwelling units at a gross density of 0.74 du/acre. The proposed amendment does not request to increase the density with the addition of the 10 acres in the RPUD boundary. The additional 10 acres will be developed with unused units currently available within the RPUD. The RPUD was deemed compatible with surrounding land uses and suitable for residential development pursuant to the most recent amendment approved per Ordinance 14-36, which also added acreage to the RPUD in close proximity to the project area. The proposal to add 10 acres of Urban-designated lands into the RPUD boundary to allow for residential uses and supportive infrastructure will not impact these findings. The immediate area along Immokalee Road has undergone extensive urban development and has has experienced major additions in terms of community and essential services in recent years. Collier Boulevard extension being one of the most recent changes to have taken place. A full range of utility infrastructure exists in the area and is available to service the RPUD. Public services also exist in the immediate area consisting of fire, schools and existing and planned commercial uses. Necessary educational facilities exist in the immediate area, and include: Laurel Oak Elementary, Oakridge Middle School, and Gulf Coast High School. North Naples Fire and Golden Gate Fire have a station within 1.5 miles fo the site and there is also parcel dedicated for public uses within the Heritage Bay Development of Regional Impact located 0.5 miles east of the Property. The RPUD is located adjacent to Activity Center #3, which contains approximately 771,000 square feet of commercial uses including a government center parcel. There have also been roadway improvements including the CR 951 extension. The project is compatible with the surrounding area throught the internal arrangement of tracts, the placement of required landscape buffers, lakes, and significant open space and preserve areas. To the south of the Property, south of Immokalee Road, lie the residential communities of Laurel Lakes and Ibis Cove, which are developed at densities of 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade G&CC of Naples RPUD PL2018002020 Evaluation Criteria Page 2 of 5 5.96 du/acre and 5.5 du/acre, respectively. The Pebblebrooke Lakes Community is also located south of Immokalee Road and is developed with 3.1 du/acre, along with activity center commercial uses. To the west of the Property lies Olde Cypress, a residential golf course community developed at 2.1 du/acre, as well as Terafina at 1.3 du/acre, and Parklands at 2.5 du/acre. To the east lies Tree Farm MPUD, which is approved at 7.22 du/acre with activity center commercial uses. Further east of Tree Farm lies the Heritage Bay DRI, a residential golf course community as 1.3 du/acre with activity center commercial. Some scattered residential homes are adjacent to the east and west of the Property along Nursery Lane, Rose Blvd., and Broken Back Road. No changes have occurred in this area since the last approval that would raise compatibility issues. Furthermore, the Applicant is not requesting an increase in density or number of approved dwelling units. The 10-acre addition will be developed with unused density approved for the overall RPUD. The Tree Farm MPUD directly to the east of the 10-acre addition is approved for residential uses and serves as further evidence of the residential development pattern in the immediate area. The ornamental landscape nursery to the south will be screened from the proposed residential uses through landscape buffers. Therefore, based upon the nature of surrounding uses, the established development pattern along Immokalee Road, and the existing levels of public infrastrcture to service the proposed RPUD, the Property is suitable for the addition of the 10-acres as proposed through this application. Moreover, the project will ensure the existing land area within the County’s Urban-designated is not underutilized from a public infrastructure standpoint, thereby upholding sound planning principles. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not toe be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The subject property is under Unified Control by Maxine Hatcher and Dawn Hatcher, who has authorized Taylor Morrison Esplanade Naples, LLC to file this application, as demonstrated by the Covenant of Unified Control included in the application. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy or 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade G&CC of Naples RPUD PL2018002020 Evaluation Criteria Page 3 of 5 other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that subdistrict, policy or other provision.) FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 5.2: All applications and petitions for proposed development shall be consistent with this Growth Management Plan, as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. The RPUD is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as follows: Policy 5.4: New developments shall be compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding land uses as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04- 41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). The RPUD’s compatibility with surrounding land uses was reviewed and approved as part of the original PUD, which was most recently amended per Ordinance 14- 36. As described above, the surrounding land use pattern is largely comprised of residential and mixed-use developments at urban levels of density and intensity. The proposed addition of 10 acres of land into the RPUD via this application will not impact the project’s compatibility with these established land uses. Specifically, the 10 acres abuts the Tree Farm PUD to the east, which contains residential uses in the areas that are directly adjacent to the proposed addition. The ornamental landscape nursery to the south will be screened from the proposed residential uses through landscape buffers. Policy 5.5: Encourage the use of land presently designated for urban intensity uses before designating other areas for urban intensity uses. This shall occur by planning for the expansion of County owned and operated public facilities and services to existing lands designated for urban intensity uses, the Rural Settlement District (formerly known as North Golden Gate), and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, before servicing new areas. The RPUD is located within the Urban and Rural Fringe Mixed Use (RFMU) Neutral Lands boundaries. These areas are designated for expansion of the County owned and operated public facilities. The 10+/- acres proposed for inclusion are designated Urban Residential. This amendment will allow for infill development on a parcel of land intended for urban densities and served by public facilities. Policy 5.6: Permit the use of clustered residential development, Planned Unit Development techniques, mixed-use development, rural villages, new towns, satellite communities, transfer of development rights, agricultural and conservation easements, and other innovative approaches, in order to conserve open space and environmentally sensitive areas. Continue to review and amend the zoning and subdivision regulations as necessary to allow and encourage such innovative land development techniques. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade G&CC of Naples RPUD PL2018002020 Evaluation Criteria Page 4 of 5 The RPUD is a residential project incorporating Planned Unit Development techniques, such as clustered development patterns, which result in significant habitat protection. The proposed amendment will serve to locate the density of clustered residential uses within the development footprint, continuing the substantial preservation areas within the overall RPUD. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Per the attached PUD Master Plan (Exhibit “C”), the RPUD will connect to Immokalee Road, and the Collier Boulevard/CR 951 extension. The 10 acres proposed for addition to the project will be accessed via the internal roadway network. The amendment will not result in any new external access points to the RPUD. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. This RPUD has internal access roads to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby arterial roads. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The RPUD proposes a variety of dwelling types, ranging from single-family detached to multi-family, which vary in price in accordance with this policy. Moreover, the existing recreational components, expansive areas of open space, and requisite sidewalks and multi-use paths ensure a walkable community. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT The RPUD is consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as follows: Policy 6.1.2.: Native Preservation Neutral Lands: A minimum of 60% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 45% of the total site area shall be preserved. The newly proposed RPUD boundary is comprised of 1668.3+/- acres, of which approximately 909.6+/- acres are considered existing native habitat. As shown on the PUD master plan, the project provides 545.8+/- acres of on-site native habitat preservation, which meets the above requirement. Furthermore, this acreage does not exceed 45% of the entire site (45% of 1668.3 acres, or 750.7 acres). 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade G&CC of Naples RPUD PL2018002020 Evaluation Criteria Page 5 of 5 Existing Native Habitat = 909.6+/- acres (from 903.8+/-acres) Required Native Habitat = 545.8+/- acres (from 542.3+/- acres) Provided Native Habitat (on site) = 545.8+/- acres (from 542.3+/- acres) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The internal proposed uses are not subject to this amendment. No additional uses are being proposed. The approved uses mirror those uses approved in neighboring communities, such as Olde Cypress and The Quarry. Moreover, the request does not modify the approved density. The approved density is well below the surrounding approved densities, thereby ensuring external compatibility. The proposed 10-acre addition to the RPUD boundary has no impact on this finding, and will allow for continuation of the residential development pattern in this area. Additionally, the project will provide external buffers to meet or exceed the LDC’s buffering requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD provides significant on-site preserve areas as described in detail above. Additionally, landscape buffers, lakes and recreational areas are proposed, which will meet the LDC’s definition of useable open space. Per the proposed PUD master plan, the project will provide preserve and useable open space well in excess of the GMP and LDC requirements. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. As outlined in the enclosed application, all required public infrastructure is available and adequate to service the proposed RPUD. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. While the RPUD boundary is expanding by 10+/- acres, there are no additional units being requested. The RPUD is located in an area of the County specifically intended for expansion, as evidenced by the adjacent activity center and surrounding land use pattern. The appropriate faciliities and infrastructure exist to accommodate the 10+/- acre addition to the RPUD boundary. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The project will continue to conform to all applicable PUD regulations. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 5 of 11 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will not receive further processing and an application “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”. Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 9 of 11 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre-application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Checklist continues on next page 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 10 of 11 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if Amending the PUD Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet:  Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses  Exhibit B: Development Standards  Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code  Exhibit D: Legal Description  Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each  Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION  Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00  PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00  Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00  Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00  Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade G&CC RPUD PL20180002020 Cover Letter/Request Statement Page 1 of 3 September 10, 2018 Mr. Ray Bellows, AICP Zoning & Land Development Review Department Community Development & Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Esplanade Naples RPUD Rezone Application (Hatcher Property Addition) PL20180002020 Dear Mr. Bellows: Enclosed for your review is the Application for PUD rezone for the Esplanade Golf & Country Club Residential Planning Unit Development (“Property”). Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc. is requesting to add 10+/- acres, currently zoned Rural Agricultural (A), to the RPUD boundary, and modify development standards, commitments, and the PUD Master Plan. The existing RPUD consists of 1,658.3+/- acres, and was most recently amended per Ordinance 2014-36. Lands within the current RPUD boundary are designated within the Urban Residential Subdistrict and Rural Fringe Mixed Use (RFMU) Overlay Neutral Lands per the Collier County Future Land Use Map. The additional 10+/- acres are entirely within the Urban Residential Subdistrict. BACKGROUND/PROJECT HISTORY: The Property was originally rezoned in 2001 from Rural Agricultural with ST Overlay to a Planned Unit Development per Ordinance 2001-20. In 2009, the Property was rezoned to RPUD to allow for 799 dwelling units, 36 golf course holes, 780+/- acres of on-site preserve, and additional off- site preserve, thus repealing Ordinance 2001-20. In 2012, the RPUD was amended to add 95+/- acres of land, reduce the development footprint, and increase on-site preserve areas. The amendment was unanimously approved pursuant to Ordinance 12-41. In 2014, the RPUD was amended to add 19.7+/- acres of land, increase the unit count from 1,121 units to 1,233 units (an increase of 112 units). Since the 2012 approval site development has commenced, including the construction of roadways, utilities, lakes, golf course, and the amenity site. Per the latest PUD monitoring report 489 units has been developed within the RPUD. REQUEST: Taylor Morrison Esplanade Naples, LLC (“Applicant”) is requesting approval to rezone the 1,758.3+/-acre Property from RPUD and Rural Agricultural to a unified RPUD to allow for the addition of 10+/- acres into the existing RPUD boundary. The Applicant is also requesting associated revisions to the PUD document approved per Ordinance 14-36. The Applicant is not requesting an increase to the number of dwelling units or permitted density, and the Applicant is also not requesting and further deviations from the Land Development Code (LDC). 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade G&CC RPUD PL20180002020 Cover Letter/Request Statement Page 2 of 3   Specifically, the Applicant is requesting to modify the following sections in the PUD document:  Modify Exhibit B, “Development Standards”, to amend Footnote 1, relating to architectural bank treatments on lake designs;  Modify Exhibit C2, “Master Plan”, to include the 10+/- acres of land into the project boundary and designate for residential uses;  Modify Exhibit D, “Legal Description”, to also include the 10+/- acres of land;  Modify Exhibit F, “Developer Commitments”, to amend Commitment G.2. to allow for the additional dwelling units added per Ordinance 2014-36, to be located anywhere within the RPUD. The requested modifications are attached within the proposed PUD document in strikethrough/underline format. The RPUD’s compatibility with surrounding land uses was reviewed and approved as part of the original PUD, which was most recently amended per Ordinance 14-36. The surrounding land use pattern is largely comprised of residential and mixed-use developments at urban levels of density and intensity. The proposed addition of 10+/- acres of land into the RPUD via this application will not impact the project’s compatibility with these established land uses. The Tree Farm MPUD directly to the east of the 10-acre addition is approved for residential uses and serves as further evidence of the residential development pattern in the immediate area. The ornamental landscape nursery to the south will be screened from the proposed residential uses through landscape buffers. ENVIRONMENTAL: A total of 909.64+/‐acres within the overall 1,668.3+/- acre project are considered native habitat preserve, of which 545.8+/‐acres are proposed for preservation. Therefore, the RPUD will continue to meet the LDC and GMP requirements for the preservation of 60% of on‐site native habitat. Per the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. no state or federal listed species were observed on-site or within the Project’s vicinity. INFRASTRUCTURE: The subject property will be accessed via the existing main entrance on Immokalee Road and via the Collier Boulevard extensions, as depicted on Exhibit “C” RPUD Master Plan in the PUD document. No changes to the project’s external access points are proposed through the amendment. As outlined in the Letter of No Impact/Traffic Impact Statement prepared by JMB Transportation Engineering, the request to add 10+/- acres to the PUD boundary will not have an impact on traffic conditions. The request does not propose additional dwelling units or points of vehicular ingress/egress. Potable water and sanitary sewer for this project will continue to be provided by Collier County Utilities (CCU). Utility services are available from an existing water main and force main running along Collier Boulevard. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade G&CC RPUD PL20180002020 Cover Letter/Request Statement Page 3 of 3   CONCLUSION: In summary, the Applicant is proposing to add 10+/- acres to the approved RPUD boundary and modify the PUD document to address the additional acreage and clarify various conditions. As outlined in the attached application, the RPUD is consistent with the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP). Per the Pre-Application Meeting Notes, the following items are enclosed for your review: 1. A check in the amount of $14,775.00 for the PUD Rezone Application Fees; 2. Submittal cover letter detailing the purpose of the rezoning request; 3. Completed PUD Rezone Application including Evaluation Criteria; 4. Pre-application meeting notes; 5. Owner Affidavit; 6. Covenant of Unified Control; 7. Approved Addressing Checklist; 8. Warranty Deeds; 9. List Identifying Parties of the Corporation; 10. Boundary Survey (signed and sealed); 11. Project Aerial; 12. Letter of No Impact/TIS prepared by JMB Transportation, Inc.; 13. Environmental Report and FLUCCS Map; 14. Basic Drainage Plan Exhibit prepared by Waldrop Engineering; 15. Proposed PUD Document; 16. PUD Conceptual Site Plan (24”x36”and 8.5”x11”); and 17. Entire submittal documents on CD-ROM. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239) 405-7777, extension 2207, or alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. Alexis V. Crespo, AICP, LEED AP Vice President of Planning Enclosures cc: Drew Miller, Taylor Morrison Esplanade Naples, LLC Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester Tim Hall, Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Jim Banks, P.E., JMB Transportation Engineering 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Print Tax Bills Change of Address   Parcel No 00190040200 Site Address 4200 BROKEN BACK RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34119 Name / Address HATCHER, DAWN L P O BOX 111646 City NAPLES State FL Zip 34110 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres  *Estimated 3B22 000100 067 3B22 22 48 26 5 Legal 22 48 26 N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 5 AC OR 1526 PG 243 Millage Area 222 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Cd 1SG S 10 8 12 Property Summary Property Detail Sketches Trim Notices Page 1 of 1Details 11/16/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/recorddetail.html?sid=884207832&Map=No&FolioNum=00... 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Print Tax Bills Change of Address   Parcel No 00187520005 Site Address 4190 BROKEN BACK RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34119 Name / Address HATCHER, MAXINE I 4190 BROKEN BACK RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34119-9705 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres  *Estimated 3B22 000100 014 3B22 22 48 26 5 Legal 22 48 26 S1/2 OF N1/2 OF W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE 1/4 Millage Area 222 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Cd 10 8 12 Property Summary Property Detail Sketches Trim Notices Page 1 of 1Details 11/16/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/recorddetail.html?sid=884207832&Map=No&FolioNum=00... 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 1 of 8 Memorandum To: James Sabo From: Alexis Crespo cc: Drew Miller, Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc. Rich Yovanovich, Coleman, Yovanovich, Koester, P.A. Date: January 22, 2019 Subject: Esplanade Naples Golf & Country Club Rezone (PL20180002020) Neighborhood Information Meeting Synopsis Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Collier County Staff conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on Wednesday, December 5, 2018. The meeting was held at 6:00 p.m. at the St. Monica’s Episcopal Church at 7070 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida 34134. The sign-in sheets are attached as Exhibit “A” and demonstrate 47 residents were in attendance. Handouts were distributed providing the project overview and development regulations. The handouts are attached as Exhibit “B”. Alexis Crespo (Agent) conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and Staff, and an overview of the proposed RPUD rezoning application, including the location of the 10-acre addition, allowable uses, and access. She also outlined the rezoning process and opportunities to provide input at public hearings. Following the Consultant’s presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the consultant team questions regarding the proposed development. The following is a summarized list of the questions asked and responses given. The following comments were asked by attendees. The Applicant’s representatives’ responses are shown in bold. Question/Comment 1: How many homes will go in that area?  Response: Anywhere from 37-76 homes could fit [on the 10-acre addition], but we don’t know an exact number at this time. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 2 of 8 Question/Comment 2: If the number of homes on DiLillo [parcel] was between 40-42 how can you double that (number of units) on half the size of land?  Response: DiLillo is developed with single-family homes. A coach home product type is allowed per the zoning and could result in more units being developed on this property. Question/Comment 3: Declarations discuss side entry homes, are there any of that [dwelling type] going on these 10 acres?  Response: That product type is currently allowed by zoning, so it is a possibility. Question/Comment 4: But twice the number of units on half the property [could actually fit]?  Response: Coach homes are on other side of Esplanade Blvd. at the Bellano community. A Bellano type product done would hit that number. Question/Comment 5: Original concept for ESP was 1,121, now up to 1,123 the density is important relative to doors and lifestyle, original concept was 2/3 single-family and 1/3 multi-family, seems with condos going in on Montelanico Loop, are we shifting away from this and getting closer to half and half.  Response: The current plan on this 10-acres are 52-foot lots like on the DiLillo parcel. That is what we are site planning and moving forward with now. Things change with the market. We had originally planned on all condo products around Montelanico Loop, and over time that changed too. Question/Comment 6: Can we see what this master plan looks like? Can you put on your website what the plan is?  Response: We currently show a rendered master plan on the website, but we cannot put very specific details on the website because it changes so much. The market may slow down, and we need to maintain flexibility. Currently the site plan for the additional 10-acres is for single-family. Question/Comment 7: Does Taylor Morrison intend to inquire the landscaping property to south of the 10-acres?  Response: There is currently no discussion on that. It is not for sale that we know of. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 3 of 8 Question/Comment 8: More condos and multi-family dwellings, shouldn’t you have to go through the residents that bought? I bought because it had less amount of multi- family and now there’s more multi-family. We’re the ones that bought in there and now we’re being squeezed out. The developer needs to go through us, not through the county.  Response: Your concern has been documented. Question/Comment 9: This is putting pressure on infrastructure, we’re not even built out and fitness classes are full and so is parking, and now we’re adding more to that? We bought because we thought it was higher scale and now all the condos, are these new dwellings going to be golfing members too?  Response: No, these will be just like Dillilo, but we reserve the right to mix in the community if the market changes. Our intention at this point would be non- golf members just like DiLillo, but it’s still too early to commit to that right now. Question/Comment 10: How many doors are occupied to date?  Response: Upwards of 700. Question/Comment 11: So, 1,233 can be built?  Response: The PUD is approved for that many units. Through this rezone, that number is not changing. We’re adding more land area (10-acres) to spread out the units and reduce the overall density. Question/Comment 12: Where on this 10 acres are these 1,233 units going? Or where in the community?  Response: We do not have a final site plan today for the build-out of all the units, but we do reserve the right to those units. Question/Comment 13: Is TM planning on enlarging the clubhouse?  Response: Amenities going in at other communities within Esplanade. We’ve had issues with programming that we are going to address. The learning center and culinary center going in for permitting now and will be finished soon. Question/Comment 14: How many rooms does the culinary center hold?  Response: We do not have that number yet. We are delivering what we promised and we’re excited about what we are offering. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 4 of 8 Question/Comment 15: Hosting a follow up meeting to be scheduled in January. Question/Comment 16: If the intention is to build 52-foot homes, will you eliminate some condos and coach homes being built now?  Response: We have a plan and as we sell the plan changes yearly. No plans to eliminate what is being built now. Question/Comment 17: When do you make that commitment [to build 52’ lots on 10-are addition]? At a public hearing people won’t be happy not knowing and you won’t get the cooperation if you don’t commit to single-family.  Response: There is no proposed increase to density. We’re adding 10-acres so the 1,233 units can be spread out. The 10-acre addition helps with that. Question/Comment 18: [TM is] not adding 10 acres unless the county approves it, and unless they don’t object to the residents saying no. Flexibility not good for the home owners, good for TM to manipulate where houses go, are you looking for us as homeowners to back you up on this, but I’m not hearing it’s great for me.  Response: Same density on same acreage, adding 10 acres because we’re selling more 52s, 62s, and 72s and you can control who is coming in there and can have a comfort level with that. You’re getting a Taylor Morrison quality product. Question/Comment 19: Infrastructure in center of community will not handle any more people. Parking is terrible.  Response: Working through those issues. Parking in progress. We could and can have the same number of units on the current property. Issues don’t change by adding 10 acres. Question/Comment 20: Where is the space for this new parking? Destroy the integrity of the community for the mix of SF and MF because you have the ability to do it isn’t fair to residents.  Response: Understood. Question/Comment 21: How will they have access to neighborhood?  Response: Torre Vista. Question/Comment 22: Anything happening with U turn on Immokalee? 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 5 of 8 Question/Comment 23: Larger CDD because of that now too correct? Who will cover cost?  Response: It will be added to density. Association pays for it. Gets turned over to Collier County. Question/Comment 24: I was told max was 1,121, how did it grow?  Response: In 2014, when DiLillo was added, is when it went up to 1,233 units. Question/Comment 25: Why isn’t sales center giving true information?  Response: We will follow up on that. Question/Comment 26: Forms showed 1,121, should have been fixed then, such as a reduced assessment. Things aren’t linked.  Response: Taylor Morrison is not being disingenuous, in real estate, buyer preferences change, people want single-family then two years later people want multi-family. They need flexibility. Question/Comment 27: Amenities were not finished.  Response: We’ve document that and we’re working on it. Question/Comment 28: Taylor Morrison is concerned about themselves more than residents. Question/Comment 29: Pro shop and culinary center are taking too long.  Response: We’re working on it. Question/Comment 30: We are the residents and owners we want people to like where we live, we’re not getting answers. Question/Comment 31: I came here 3 years ago, I was told clubhouse would be available. Still not started. When will it be started?  Response: I agree, and we understand there’s frustration out there. We’re finishing as fast as we can. Question/Comment 32: Reading what a CDD is – as a realtor. Taylor Morrison took out a tax-free bond to cost building amenities, pools, clubhouses, tennis courts, we are paying 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 6 of 8 tax of bond, they are not releasing it. That’s the answer we got.  Response: It’s not a money thing. It’s wrong information. We are setting a developer meeting to go through plans. Question/Comment 33: Are they taking out more loans?  Response: It is possible. They go with the lot they don’t add to your loans. 2 residents will be on board. Question/Comment 34: When can we get definitive answers?  Response: Schedule for amenities, mid-January, can’t give a firm answer because it does depend on sales. Getting ready to start construction. In 6 months this will be a moot point. Question/Comment 35: Here’s a solution for parking, allow trail fees for golf carts.  Response: Not sure yet, but valid point. Question/Comment 36: At developer meeting have the number of closed homes, number of contracts, and what ratio looks like now under contract, so we know what that ratio is.  Response: Ok, thank you. Question/Comment 37: Haven’t heard one answer.  Response: Tonight’s meeting was about the application we filed for 10 acres. Question/Comment 38: Suggestion on zoning, everything is fluid, trust is an enormous issue here. Yes, better to have what you know, yes, it’s Taylor Morrison. Astonishing that Taylor Morrison credibility with this community is so low. Coming in asking for our input, but not connecting dots with answers.  Response: It is not going un-noted, we are connecting the dots. Question/Comment 39: Wasn’t sure if sense in room was to support or oppose and still trying to anticipate that. If answers come forward. Post that online, let us have information that you follow through on. That might increase support.  Response: Many issues will be noted at developer meeting. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 7 of 8 Question/Comment 40: At Taylor Morrison you talk to 10 diff people you get 10 diff answers. Teach them to say I don’t know.  Response: Understood. Question/Comment 41: When will there be a determination on what is going to be built. You already know the financial positives.  Response: We intend at this point of time 52’ lots. More surety of that will be after zoning when construction plans are filed with county that shows lots. Hopefully through zoning process, you’ll get notification, and then our engineers get started on the construction plans and that shows exactly what is being built. Question/Comment 42: What will you do with condos? We don’t want condos.  Response: A lot of people do want condos. Question/Comment 43: Intended to start construction before others are finished?  Response: No, timing wise not how it will play out. Likely by beginning of 2020 with existing tracts. Question/Comment 44: So, you’ll start after that?  Response: Not necessarily. Question/Comment 45: Need additional permitting to build amenities on that 10 acres?  Response: No matter what we will need permitting. Question/Comment 46: Don’t you know what you’re going to put in the rest of the property?  Response: Looking to add 62s in an area we had 52s, gives us an opportunity to mix. Question/Comment 47: Do you have same flexibility on that property?  Response: Yes. Question/Comment 48: What are plans for Tree Farm? 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 8 of 8  Response: Residential and commercial near CR951. Some areas will be mixed use. Question/Comment 49: What insurance do we have you won’t do this again? [Come back and develop]  Response: If we ever wanted to add more land or increase density we will file application and you will be notified through the public hearing process. Question/Comment 50: Any new amenities on the docket?  Response: Maybe add some more pickleball. Question/Comment 51: Who knows size of amenity? No one knows. Seems like there’s no planning or thinking ahead. There were no further questions or comments. Ms. Crespo thanked the attendees for coming and noted that their contact information is available for those who wished to reach out with any further questions. The meeting concluded at approximately 7:15 p.m. The meeting was recorded per the CD attached as Exhibit “C”. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 130Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 131Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 132Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 133Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 134Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples (RPUD) Neighborhood Information Meeting Wednesday, December 5, 2018 ~ 7070 Immokalee Rd. ~ St. Monica’s Episcopal Church Project Information Sheet Current Zoning: Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) & Rural Agricultural (A) Proposed Zoning: Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Current RPUD Boundary: 1,658.3+/- acres Proposed RPUD Boundary: 1,668.3+/-acres (increase by 10 acres) Future Land Use: Urban Residential Subdistrict & Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay (No Change) Approved Density/Uses: 1,233 dwelling units @ 0.74 du/ac; residential and golf uses Proposed Density/Uses: 1,233 dwelling units @ 0.70 du/acre; residential and golf uses 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Development Standards  PERMITTED USES AND STANDARDS Single Family Detached Zero Lot Line Two Family And Duplex Townhouse *12 Multi- Family Dwelling *12 Clubhouse/ Recreation Buildings *6 Principal Structures Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per lot or unit *3 2,000 SF 9,000 SF n/a Minimum Lot Width *4 50’ *7 40’ *7 35’ per lot or unit *7 20’ 90’ n/a Front Yard Setback 2* 20’ *2 *7 20’ *2 *7 20’ *2 *7 20’ *2 20’ *2 25’ Side Yard Setback 5’ *11 0 or 10’ 7.5’ *8 7.5’ *8 10’ or 1/2 BH for structures exceeding 35 feet *5 5’ Rear Yard Setback *1 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 0’ Setback From Golf Course 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 20’ Setbacks from Preserves 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ Maximum Zoned Height *10 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 50’ (5 stories not to exceed 50’) *9 50’ Actual Height *10 45’ 45’ 45’ 45’ 65’ 75’ Floor Area Min. Per Unit (S.F) 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 750 SF n/a Distance Between Principal Structures 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 20’or ½ SUM of BH for structures exceeding 35’ *5 15’ or .5 BH whichever is greater *6 Accessory Structures Single Family Detached Zero Lot Line Two Family And Duplex Townhouse Multi- Family Dwelling Clubhouse/ Recreation Buildings *6 Front Yard Setback*2 SPS *7 SPS *7 SPS SPS SPS SPS Side Yard Setback 5’ 0 or 10’ 5’ 5’ 10’ or 1/2 BH for structures exceeding 35 feet *5 5’ Rear Yard Accessory Setback *1 5’ 5’ 5’ 5’ 10’ 5’ Setback From Preserves 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Distance Between Accessory and Principal Structures on Same lot 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ Distance Between Accessory and Principal Structures on Same lot 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ Maximum Zoned Height *10 SPS SPS SPS SPS 35’ 35’ Actual Height *10 SPS SPS SPS SPS 45’ 45’ Front Yards for all uses shall be measured as follows: If the parcel is served by a public road right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). * 1 – Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lakes and open spaces. Setbacks from lakes for all principal and accessory uses may be 0 feet provided architectural treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from the Collier County Engineering Division. 0’ principal and accessory setbacks are permitted from lake maintenance easements and landscape buffer easements. *2 - Single-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage driveways may reduce the front yard requirement to 10 feet for a side entry garage. Multi-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and provide for guest parking may reduce the front yard to 15 feet. This reduction shall not result in an approval to impede or block the sidewalk. Front loaded garages shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk. *3 - Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 square feet for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet. *4 Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. *5 - Building distance may be reduced at garages to half the sum of the height of the garages. *6 Although neither setbacks nor separation between structures are applicable to the clubhouse and other recreation structures locate don a clubhouse tract, neither the clubhouse nor any other recreational structure shall be located closer than 25 feet from any residential or preservation boundary *7 – The use of flag lots is allowed to provide maximum flexibility in subdivision design and may vary from the minimum lot widths. However, neither the minimum lot area, nor the minimum distance between structures may be reduced. *8 – Zero foot (0’) setback for internal units. *9 Inclusive of under building parking *10 Buildings shall not exceed three stories within 1,250 feet of Immokalee Road. *11 5’ side yard setbacks shall apply to lots equal to or less than 70’ in width. Lots greater than 70’ in width will provide 6’ side yard setbacks. *12 Maximum length of buildings shall not exceed 300 linear feet. BH = Building Height SPS = Same as Principal Structure Notwithstanding the foregoing; none of the footnotes shall operate as a deviation from the Land Development Code unless they are listed as deviations on Exhibit E. None of the footnotes operate as deviations from the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances.       9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 140Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 141Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 142Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 143Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 144Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 145Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 146Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 147Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 148Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 149Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 150Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 151Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 152Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 153Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 154Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 155Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 156Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 157Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 158Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 159Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 160Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 1 of 5 Memorandum To: James Sabo, AICP From: Alexis Crespo, AICP cc: Drew Miller, Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc. Richard Yovanovich, Coleman, Yovanovich, Koester, P.A. Date: February 27, 2019 Subject: Esplanade Naples Golf & Country Club Rezone (PL20180002020) Second Neighborhood Information Meeting Synopsis Taylor Morrison and their consultant team conducted a second Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on Wednesday, February 27, 2019 to discuss the Esplanade Naples Golf & Country Club PUD Rezone (PL2018-2020). The meeting was held at 6:00 p.m. at the St. Monica’s Episcopal Church at 7070 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida 34134. The sign-in sheets are attached as Exhibit “A” and demonstrate 52 residents were in attendance. No handouts were distributed. Alexis Crespo (Agent) conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and Staff, and an overview of the proposed RPUD rezoning application, including the location of the 10-acre addition, allowable uses, and access. She also outlined the rezoning process and opportunities to provide input at public hearings. Key updates provided included Taylor Morrison’s commitment to limit development in the 10-acre addition to a maximum of 37 single-family detached units. Following the Agent’s presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask questions regarding the proposed development. The following is a summarized list of the questions asked and responses given. The Applicant’s representatives’ responses are shown in bold. Question/Comment 1: What is in this particular parcel (pointing to landscape nursery south of the 10-acre addition)?  Response: A landscape nursery is located on the parcel. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 2 of 5 Question/Comment 2: Is the number of permitted homes on the DiLillo [parcel] affected after the transfer of units to the 10-acre addition?  Response: The number of permitted homes on the DiLillo parcel remains the same even after the transfer of units. We are not increasing the number of units permitted by the zoning today. Question/Comment 3: Will the undeveloped 10-acre parcel in the project area be developed in the future (referring to the landscape nursery parcel)?  Response: For Taylor Morrison to develop that 10-acre parcel, they would have to follow the planning process, including public hearings. It is not in their plans currently to purchase this property to include in the Esplanade community. Question/Comment 4: Will we be able to use the wellness center and other amenities?  Response: All amenities will remain open during the process of building the proposed residential units. Future residents of the 10-acre addition would be able to use the Esplanade community amenities. Question/Comment 5: Will there be enough parking (at the amenities) after the buildout?  Response: The amount of parking available has already been reviewed and permitted. The parking lots are designed to accommodate the use of the building, the amount of people. We have many Esplanade communities with the same types and size of amenities and the parking is sufficient at these communities. We understand the concern, and we are currently adding more golf cart parking at the amenity campus, and we are reviewing where we could relieve additional parking pressure. Question/Comment 6: Could you show us a site plan with the parking spots?  Response: We have a community meeting on March 12th and we will bring images detailing where and how the parking would be accommodated during the construction phase. Question/Comment 7: Where would the proposed temporary parking be located?  Response: We will be working with all the parties involved and with the community to find the optimal place for the temporary parking spots. Question/Comment 8: Were there any additional parking studies done for the additional units being proposed? 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 3 of 5  Response: The use of the building determines the amount of necessary parking, not the increase or decrease of the residential units being proposed. Additional units are not being requested through this application, so the PUD rezoning does not affect the amenity parking. Question/Comment 9: Additional concerns were expressed over the amount of proposed amenity parking and the proposed residential units.  Response: When you review the numbers of the amount of units developed, and the amount of units permitted in the RPUD, the addition of this 10 acres would provide the land area to build an additional 16 residential units to the community overall. Even with this additional 10 acres we will not build all of the units permitted by the zoning. We will be working with the community over where to locate additional parking. Question/Comment 10: Could additional property be annexed or converted for additional parking spaces?  Response: Some physical structures that are planned will provide relief for parking by creating walkable amenities and additional parking spaces. Question/Comment 11: How many employees do you need to operate the amenities? Have their parking necessities been considered?  Response: The concern was received and will get back to you with an answer. We have employee parking areas away from the amenities at the golf maintenance facility. Question/Comment 12: Concern regarding current deficit parking, which would get worse by the construction of the proposed residential units.  Response: The concern was noted by Taylor Morrison. Question/Comment 13: Some dining amenities do not have the necessary number of tables and seats, additionally, the parking requirement is too little for the amount of people that come to the amenities.  Response: The capacity of some dining amenities will be expanded through the buildout process. We are working toward finding an optimal parking number. Question/Comment 14: Concern was expressed over the approved deviation relating to amenity parking. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 4 of 5  Response: The concern was received by Taylor Morrison and by Waldrop Engineering. It was explained this was a typical approved deviation for private, on-site amenity parking. Question/Comment 15: It would almost be a certainty that an employee parking lot is needed to satisfy demand. Has that been looked at?  Response: We are working toward locating an optimal spot for additional parking spaces. Question/Comment 16: To whom do you bring this feedback back to? What is the potential for most individuals to attend this type of meeting?  Response: Multiple leaders in our organization will hear the feedback from tonight’s discussion. Taylor Morrison’s leadership team will hear this feedback. Question/Comment 17: Would you consider holding up the proposed timeline for the parcel that is intended for the development of the residential units until the issues that are of concern are addressed?  Response: We will continuously work toward getting the answers to your questions ahead of this meeting. That is our goal. We will meet with you on March 12th on the specifics of amenity timing and parking. Question/Comment 18: Is Taylor Morrison building the amenities to the minimum?  Response: We are not building our amenities to the minimum. We offer great amenities, which are designed to bring the community together. There is no minimum square footage requirement for the amenities. Question/Comment 19: Are the developers focusing exclusively on this project? What is the timeline for our feedback to be incorporated into the new site plan?  Response: The Taylor Morrison group is working on multiple projects at the same time. Although this project is of great importance to all parties involved, a process needs to be followed and permits incorporating feedback take time to be approved. Question/Comment 20: Concern regarding a perceived shortcoming from Taylor Morrison to hear feedback from the community.  Response: The concern was received by all parties involved and the developer and team agreed that there is always room for improvement. Additional actions will be taken to become more transparent to the community. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 5 of 5 Question/Comment 21: A member of the public expressed concern regarding a lack of support for the proposed residential units until some improvements are made that should improve the quality of life of the current residents.  Response: The concern was received, and the developer’s team will work toward creating sustainable improvements to the current proposal after gathering the community’s feedback. Question/Comment 21: A member of the public suggested for an additional developer update in conjunction with the HOA election meeting coming up.  Response: The concern was received, and the developer’s team asked for a specific list that could be worked on, so a possible date could be looked at. Question/Comment 21: A member of the public commented on the need for a sustainable approach that would benefit all the parties involved, including the community and the developer’s team.  Response: The concern was received. There were no further questions or comments. Ms. Crespo thanked the attendees for coming and noted that their contact information is available for those who wished to reach out with any further questions. The meeting concluded at approximately 7:15 p.m. The meeting was recorded per the CD attached as Exhibit “C”. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) February 8, 2019 RE: Esplanade Golf & Country Club Residential Planned Unit Development (PUDR) PL20180002020 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Taylor Morrison Esplanade Naples, LLC is hosting a follow-up neighborhood information meeting regarding the formal application filed with Collier County seeking approval to add 10+/- acres currently zoned Rural Agricultural (A), to the Esplanade Naples Golf & Country Club Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD), modify development standards, PUD commitments, and the PUD Master Plan. The Applicant is not requesting an increase to the number of dwelling units or permitted density, and the Applicant is also not requesting any further deviations from the Land Development Code (LDC). The existing RPUD consists of 1,658.3+/- acres and is generally located north of Immokalee Road and 1/4 mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951). The 10+/-acre addition that is the subject of this request is located north of Immokalee Road and west of Broken Back Road in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to understand the application, get updates from the Applicant, and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday February 27, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. at St. Monica’s Episcopal Church, 7070 Immokalee Rd, Naples, FL 34119. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 405-7777 ext. 2207, or alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. Alexis V. Crespo, AICP, LEED AP Senior Vice President - Planning *Please note that St. Monica’s Episcopal Church does not sponsor or endorse this program. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 1 of 21 NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 SECT TWP RANGE 1186937 ONTARIO LLD 6790 DAVAND DR # 5 MISSISSAUGA, ON CANADA L5T 2G5 22 48 26 1293523 ONTARIO LTD 1035 NELLIE LITTLE CRESCENT NEWMARKET, ON CANADA L3X 3E4 22 48 26 292 FIFTEENTH REVOCABLE TRUST 137 CROSBY BLVD AMHERST, NY 14226---0000 15 48 26 8224 KEY ROYAL CIR 214 TRUST 5091 CHERRY WOOD DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 8234 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE LLC 7998 HELENA COURT AVE MARIA, FL 34142---0000 27 48 26 ABRAHAM, GREGORY R 8761 BELLANO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 ACCINNO REVOCABLE TRUST 7360 LANTANA WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 ADAMS, CURTIS C & DEBRA J 9710 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4660 23 48 26 ADAMS, KENNETH R & LINDA NOREN 8624 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 ADAMS, SELA J 9496 GAILIANO TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 AITKEN, ROBERT J 30 MAIN ST SE BROOKLYN, NY 11201---0000 27 48 26 AJV INDUSTRIES LLC C/O PHYLLIS ANTONALLI 1213 WILLOWGATE ST CHARLES, IL 60134---0000 15 48 26 AJV INDUSTRIES LLC C/O PHYLLIS ANTONALLI 1213 WILLOWGATE ST CHARLES, IL 60174---0000 15 48 26 ALBANESE, ANTHONY & ELISANNE 9159 TRIVOLI TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 ALBERT P GUARINO REV TRUST 210 W HILL ROAD MARLBOROUGH, MA 01752---0000 22 48 26 ALDANA, HAROLD E 8244 KEY ROYAL CIR #636 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 ALLEN, PHILIP B & KELLY A 84 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9757 27 48 26 ALLISON, DECLAN T 8297 KEY ROYAL LANE #316 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 ALVARADO, SILVIE RENE NAVARRETE ALVARADO 97 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 ALVAREZ, JOSE JAVIER 9431 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 AMAR, JULIEN 8532 LAUREL LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 AMATO, SALVATORE CATHERINE RODRIGUES 8288 KEY ROYAL LN APT 1411 NAPLES, FL 34119---6799 27 48 26 AMBINA PROPERTIES LLC 29410 AMBINA DRIVE SOLON, OH 44139---0000 23 48 26 AMISTA F MORGAN TRUST 9259 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 AMLINGER, MARK & HEATHER 11 HICKORY DR ROCKWOOD, ON CANADA N0B 2K0 22 48 26 AMONINI, ANGELO % INTERNATIONAL REALTY CORP 3838 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 416 NAPLES, FL 34103---0000 15 48 26 ANDRES, MARLIN & VICKI 20 WEST 7TH ST NEW ALBANY, IN 47150---0000 22 48 26 ANTONACCI, CHRISTIAN L 111 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9751 27 48 26 ANTONACCI, CHRISTIAN LUIS PATTI ANN ANTONACCI 111 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9751 27 48 26 ARCE, OSCAR A & ADA H 3300 WHITESTONE CIR #108 KISSIMMEE, FL 34741---7742 27 48 26 ARCHBOLD, JAMES M & YURIKO 9605 COBALT COVE CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 ARCHIBALD, GEORGE F & PEGGY 5201 CYPRESS LN NAPLES, FL 34113---7709 22 48 26 ARCHIBALD, GEORGE F & PEGGY J 5201 CYPRESS LN NAPLES, FL 34113---7709 22 48 26 ARIAS, JOAQUIN ANTONIO ESTELA ARIAS 8284 KEY ROYAL CIR #1311 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 ARMOUR LIVING TRUST 20 SHATTUCK PARK RD NORWOOD, MA 02062---0000 22 48 26 ARQIMANDRITI, ELONA VANGJUSH TREBICKA 8297 KEY ROYAL LANE UNIT 336 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 ASPENBURG JR, CARL & JUDITH 9012 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 AUGUSTIN, DEVENEL & GUETCHINE 93 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9759 27 48 26 AVRAMIS, BILL G & ANA M 5937 ASHFORD LANE NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 AZAN, KENNETH N & SHARMAN E 2810 WHITNEY DRIVE SEDALIA, MO 65301---0000 22 48 26 B & J HELLMAN REV LIV TRUST 8687 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 B J WEIGEL & M A WEIGEL TRUST 6709 SUMMIT LAKE DRIVE CINCINNATI, OH 45247---0000 22 48 26 BAILEN, JAMES M -& MARY LOU 9 VENTURA CIRCLE FREDONIA, NY 14063---0000 15 48 26 BAILEN, NICHOLAS D 9479 GALLIANO TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BAKER, DEREK R DAVID R BAKER 8254 KEY ROYAL CIR #713 NAPLES, FL 34119---6808 27 48 26 BALLIACHE, MARTHA LUIS A SEIJAS MORALES 8294 KEY ROYAL CIR #1614 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 BANAS, DONALD 8083 IBIS COVE NAPLES, FL 34119---7749 27 48 26 BARBER, KEVIN 4870 COVERED BRIDGE RD MILLVILLE, NJ 08332---0000 22 48 26 BARBER, KEVIN G 4870 COVERED BRIDGE RD MILLVILLE, NJ 08332---0000 15 48 26 BARKER, ROBERT J & CHERYL J 10721 BUCK DR ORLAND PARK, IL 60467---0000 15 48 26 BARLOW, MARY ANN 8765 BELLANO COURT #202 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BARNETT, ROBERT M & KIM T 8718 WALTON POND CIR BLOOMINGTON, MN 55438---0000 23 48 26 BARRABI, RICHARD P & LAURA L 2423 RUGBY ST EAST MEADOW, NY 11554---3010 27 48 26 BARRETO, CARLA F 8234 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #521 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 BARRIE GRAHAM REV TRUST NICHOLAS DIGIROLAMO REV TRUST 9352 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 BARTHOLOMEW FAMILY TRUST 8671 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BARTOLOTTA, ANTHONY L 8789 GAVANO ST E NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BARTON, BETTY 1128 MAPLE ST TALLMADGE, OH 44278---2554 27 48 26 BARTON, KENNETH L & NANCY L 4903 SCENIC CREEK DRIVE POWELL, OH 43065---0000 15 48 26 BASTAN, LINDSAY 156 KIMBALL STREET PROVIDENCE, RI 02908---0000 27 48 26 BAUSE, MARILYNN 15193 CORTONA WAY NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 27 48 26 BEAUPRE II, RICHARD A LIZBETH K BEAUPRE 8112 NORTHRIDGE DRIVE BRIGHTON, MI 48116---0000 14 48 26 BEERS JR, KENNETH J PO BOX 850102 BRAINTREE, MA 02185---0000 22 48 26 BEKICH, JORY D MEAGAN A WELLS 5284 HEMMINGWAY LANE E #1302 NAPLES, FL 34116---0000 27 48 26 BENDER, THOMAS C & MARY M 8896 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BENJAMIN, DOUGLAS C MARGARET A BENJAMIN 8831 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BENKOVICH JR, JOHN & ANDREA 4344 HOMESTEAD LANE CLARENCE, NY 14031---0000 15 48 26 BENTLEY, ANNIE 2110 ARIELLE DR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 27 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 2 of 21 BENYA, ROBERT G BARBARA KELLY 9492 GALLIANO TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 15 48 26 BERGDALE, LARRY R 9210 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 BERGER, E KURT & LINDA P 677 PRINCETON AVE BRICK, NJ 08724---4859 27 48 26 BERGES, ALVARO & GLORIA 702 HEMLOCK ST ROSELLE PARK, NJ 07204---1704 27 48 26 BERGMANN, CYNTHIA A ANTANAS V STANKEVICIUS 8 CLUBSIDE COURT BURR RIDGE, IL 60527---0000 22 48 26 BERNHARD, KENNETH A & JULIE L 38W216 MALLARD LAKE RD SAINT CHARLES, IL 60175---0000 22 48 26 BEVERLY C ISENBERG TRUST 8818 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BHASIN, ANAND S & RANJANA 9009 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BIGOSZEWSKI ET AL, EDMUND 45 SALVIA CRT LONDON, ON CANADA N5Z 4T3 27 48 26 BILTER, CHARLES A 8297 KEY ROYAL LN APT 321 NAPLES, FL 34119---6801 27 48 26 BISCONTINI, WILLIAM BERNADINE BISCONTINI 8772 BELLANO COURT #104 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BJQ ENTERPRISE LLC 5810 HIDDEN OAKS LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 BJQ ENTERPRISES INC 5810 HIDDEN OAKS LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 BJQ ENTERPRISES INC 5810 HIDDEN OAKS LN NAPLES, FL 34119---6807 27 48 26 BLACK, WILLIAM B & PAULA C 349 HILLCREST AVENUE GROSSE PT FARMS, MI 48236---0000 22 48 26 BLUE LAND HOLDINGS LLC 4175 BROKEN BACK RD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BLUE LAND HOLDINGS LLC 4175 BROKEN BACK ROAD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34112---4961 27 48 26 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34112---4961 27 48 26 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34112---4961 27 48 26 BOCHSLER FAMILY REV TRUST 3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL N STE 416 NAPLES, FL 34103---0000 15 48 26 BOGAN, JEFFREY M & SUSAN L 8669 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 BOGGS, JAMES M & JANICE W 8643 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BOGUSLAWSKI, DAVID H & JANE E 8802 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BOLLENBACK, CASEY JULIAN HALITAJ 8285 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 1232 NAPLES, FL 34119---6815 27 48 26 BOMMARITO, JOSEPH C & DONNA R 8678 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BOND, WARD & IRENE BOX 32069 ARTHUR PO THUNDER BAY, ON CANADA P7E 0A1 15 48 26 BONOMO, JAMES CHRISTOPHER SANDRA JOY BONOMO 9079 SORRENO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BORGESE, CHRISTOPHER F SUSAN M BIANCHI 9443 GALLIANO TERR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BOSSANY, BARBARA B DONNA M BAYER 47 CLEVELAND AVE PARLIN, NJ 08859---1508 27 48 26 BOUCHUK FLORIDA TRUST 9465 LIVORNO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BOURKE, TYLER BUTLER 8768 BELLANO COURT UNIT 103 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BOWMAN, WILLIAM DAVID LAURA BETH BOWMAN 3051 ASHTON RDIGE DR SE ADA, MI 49301---0000 15 48 26 BOXER, FRANCENE M 8188 IBIS COVE CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 BRADLEY, ROBERT & NATALIA 2705 N MERMITAGE AVE CHICAGO, IL 60614---0000 22 48 26 BRADY, JEFFREY L 39 UNION ST FRANKLIN, MA 02038---0000 15 48 26 BRECHER, DAWN D 4830 CHERRY WOOD DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 11 48 26 BRENNAN, ALEXANDRA G 2727 HANCOCK HAMMOCK RD NAPLES, FL 34117---0000 27 48 26 BRESTLE, JON D 8284 KEY ROYAL CIR #1312 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 BROCK, JOE B & DEBRA S 83 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9759 27 48 26 BROWNSTEIN, HY L 9083 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BRUNO HOLDINGS LLC % CARMINE BRUNO 65 SPELLMAN ROAD WESTWOOD, MA 02090---0000 22 48 26 BRUNO, JAMES MARTA CODINA 355 PAINTED WOODS DR WAUKEE, IA 50263---0000 22 48 26 BUCHANAN LIVING TRUST 4517 MIDDLEDALE ROAD SOUTH WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48323---0000 22 48 26 BUDZYNA, JOHN M 4 BASKENRIDGE DR MIDDLETOWN, NJ 07748---0000 15 48 26 BUFFA, JOHN A REBECCA G TENEROWICZ 7909 GLACIER CLUB DRIVE WASHINGTON, MI 48094---0000 15 48 26 BURNS, ANTHONY & HEIDI 8283 ALPINE ASTER CT LIBERTY TOWNSHIP, OH 45044---0000 22 48 26 BURTON, TIMOTHY J & JANE E 8651 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BUXBAUM, ROBERT D & SUSAN 9447 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 BUYSSE, MICHAEL P 1101 SOUTH 4TH ST MARSHALL, MN 56258---0000 27 48 26 CAFFREY JR, JOHN D & LAURA D 15 BARNABY CT E HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788---2424 23 48 26 CAMPBELL JR, HUGH P & ANDREA 32 WATERVIEW DR OSSINING, NY 10562---0000 15 48 26 CAMPBELL, COLIN & PAMELA M 6843 LAKE TRAIL DR WESTERVILLE, OH 43082---0000 22 48 26 CAPPADONA, ANTHONY PETER SANDRA JEAN CAPPADONA 6 CATON ROAD FOXBOROUGH, MA 02035---0000 15 48 26 CARABBA, ADRIANA & CHRISTOPHER 9986 BOCA CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 27 48 26 CARON, BRIAN & DIANA ALICIA WITHROW 8214 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE UNIT 114 NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 27 48 26 CARPENITO, DONNA 9117 TRIVOLI TERR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 CARPENTER, KIMBERLY 9418 TERRESINA DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 CARPENTER, MATTHEW & DEBRA A 8409 HOLLOW BROOK CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 CARROLL, MARK J & TERESA M 86 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9757 27 48 26 CARROLL, THOMAS V & KRISTINE A N2256 CLEGHORN RD WAUPACA, WI 54981---0000 27 48 26 CARTER FAMILY TRUST 34 CHURCH ST DUXBURY, MA 02332---0000 22 48 26 CARUSO, ANTHONY E & DEBORA J 8874 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 CARUSO, RICHARD P & DEBRA S 70 WAKE ROBIN LANE NARWINTON, CT 06791---0000 22 48 26 CARVALHO, FATIMA JOHN M GONCALVES 170 MUIRFIELD CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34113---0000 15 48 26 CARZON, WILLIAM JOSEPH LEISA MARIA CARZON 8903 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 CASBARRO, JOSEPH & GEORGINA 9762 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4660 23 48 26 CASCIANO, MELISSA K & JOHN 98 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 CASHMAN, JERRY S & DEBRA J 8772 BELLANO CT #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 3 of 21 CASTELLANOS, JENNIFER 40 HEDGE LN WESTBURY, NY 11590---0000 27 48 26 CATALDO, ANGELO & CAROLINA MARCO A CATALDO 8288 KEY ROYAL LANE #1414 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 CAVERO, CARMEN SALAS 8224 ROYAL CIRCLE # 235 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 CC ADDISON PLACE LLC 2020 SALZEDO STREET 2ND FLOOR CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0000 22 48 26 CC ADDISON PLACE LLD 2020 SALZEDO STREET 2ND FLOOR CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0000 22 48 26 CECIL, ERIN 8234 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #536 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 CERMINARA, FRANK & SUSAN Y 8644 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 CHA, CAMILLA 8284 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 1322 NAPLES, FL 34119---6813 27 48 26 CHAGNON, EDWARD A & PATRICIA A 77 YVONNE DRIVE DALTON, MA 01226---0000 22 48 26 CHAPMAN, JOHN C 9475 GALLIANO TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 CHARDON, AXEL & EVELYN 4004 TRINIDAD WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---7507 27 48 26 CHARLEBOIS, PIERRE ROBERT SUSAN GAYLE CHARLEBOIS 9368 TERESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 CHARLES T GALVIN TRUST P O BOX 1313 CASEVILLE, MI 48725---0000 15 48 26 CHERVENAK, ROBERT J & LINDA F 112 ELIZA LN MANAHAWKIN, NJ 08050---0000 15 48 26 CHIODO, RYAN A 8611 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 CINDY K LEWIS TRUST 200 LEWIS PARK DR MT ZION, IL 62549---0000 15 48 26 CIPOLLA, FRANK & LAUREN S 9420 BENVENUTO COURT #201 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 CIRO, JOSEPH & ELIZABETH 77 PENNSFORD LANE MEDIA, PA 19063---0000 22 48 26 CLARK, ANTHONY W JANE E KESSLER 8777 BELLANO CT #102 NAPLES, FL 34119---9699 22 48 26 CLARK, DIANE M 550 ROSE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---9754 22 48 26 CLEMENS, RANDY & KAREN 9711 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4661 23 48 26 CLOEZ REYNAUD REV TRUST 8769 BELLANO CT UNIT 201 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 CLYDESDALE, GREGORY ANDREW AMY MARIE CLYDESDALE 109 BURNT PINE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 COFFEY, THOMAS J & BARBARA M 9114 TRIVOLI TER NAPLES, FL 34119---2003 15 48 26 COHEN, GEORGE S & TRINA 8287 KEY ROYAL LN #1522 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 COHEN, MICHAEL E & KATHERINE 9094 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 COIT, HARLAN R & SUSAN J 8664 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 COLAIACOMO, DENISE ALYSSA COLAIACOMO 27061 SUN AQUA LN BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---4738 27 48 26 COLEMAN, MONICA KATE PIERSON % ULSTER FINANCIAL GROUP PO BOX 545 SHOKAN, NY 12481---0000 27 48 26 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 9 48 26 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 22 48 26 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 23 48 26 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 27 48 26 COLLIER COUNTY % OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY STE 800 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 22 48 26 COLLIER PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 110101 COCO RIVER, FL 34108---0000 27 48 26 COLLIER PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 110101 NAPLES, FL 34108---0000 27 48 26 COLLINS, DANA 9425 BENVENUTO COURT #104 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 COLLINS, DANA 9425 BENVENUTO COURT #104 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 COMPOBASSO, JOSEPH M & CINDY A J & K LAPETINA TRUST 9348 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---2007 15 48 26 CONDINA, ROBERT W HOLLY L CONDINA CONDINA FAMILY TRUST 36 MT PLEASANT DR POUGHQUAG, NY 12570---0000 22 48 26 CONNELLY, JEFFREY W & SUSAN D 856 GREENTHORNE BLVD SCHENECTADY, NY 12303---0000 15 48 26 CONNOLLY, NEIL JOSEPH MARY BETH CONNOLLY 238 CARLETTA COURT PARAMUS, NJ 07652---0000 15 48 26 CONNOR, STEPHEN MARIAH A FORTE CONNOR C/O DOHA PO BOX 4490 HOUSTON, TX 77210---4490 27 48 26 CONRAD III, EDWARD J & LINDA D 9046 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 CONWAY, PATRICK J & EILEEN M 1616 MULBERRY DR LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048---0000 22 48 26 CONWAY, RICHARD G & BEVERLY P 55 HAMPTON MEADOWS HAMPTON, NH 03842---0000 15 48 26 COOGAN, PATRICIA E GEOFFREY P KINTGEN 9738 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 23 48 26 COOK, JAY F & NANCY P 9123 TRIVOLI TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 CORREA, FERNEY 35-11 85TH STREET APT 3M JACKSON HEIGHTS, NY 11372---0000 27 48 26 CORSO, THERESA CELESTE LOZZI MICHELE A CORSO 8304 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 1713 NAPLES, FL 34119---6804 27 48 26 CORTEZ, OSCAR R 8298 KEY ROYAL LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 COSCIA, SIMONE F JOSEPHINE A COSCIA 9469 LIVORNO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 COSIMO CORDI REV TRUST 1145 NORTH STREET SUFFIELD, CT 06078---0000 27 48 26 COSSART, WILLIAM J BARBARA H WALDMAN 2209 COLAFAX COURT LEHIGH ACRES, FL 33973---0000 22 48 26 COSTA, CLAUDIO SERGIO A COSTA ROSSANO M COSTA 78 EUGENIA ST NEW BEDFORD, MA 02745---5928 27 48 26 COSTIGANE, ROBERT M CYNTHIA L COSTIGANE 2-700 GLASGOW ST KITCHENER, ON CANADA N2M 2N8 14 48 26 COTTER, MICHAEL G 9684 MONTELANICO LOOP BLDG 13 #204 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 COURTER INVSTMT GULF COAST LLC 14833 INDIGO LAKES CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---4813 27 48 26 COX, BARRY M & JUDITH L 93 BLACK ROCK DR HINGHAM, MA 02043---0000 22 48 26 COX, BRENT W 8075 IBIS COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 CRIFASI III, JACK J 77 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9759 27 48 26 CURRIE, STEPHANIE A 5413 N SHORE PLACE MASON, OH 45040---0000 22 48 26 CURTIS, DIANNE M 9206 RIALTO LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 CURTIS, DIANNE M RICHARD A DAUTILIO 9206 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 15 48 26 CYNKAR REV TRUST 9601 COBALT COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 CZUBACHOWSKI, LOUIS R ROSE ANN M CONTI 234 SANTA ROSA COURT HOLMDEL, NJ 07733---0000 15 48 26 D & H GRKOVICH LIVING TRUST 33 TROTWOOD CT BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089---0000 22 48 26 DALTON/CORMIER TRUST 8814 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 DANEY, KEVIN SCOTT BARBARA MARIE DANEY 9501 LIVORNO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 4 of 21 DANOWSKI, GARY R & KAREN A 200 ASHBOURNE DR WESTLAKE, OH 44145---0000 22 48 26 DARLING, JAMES ALAN KATHLEEN DENISE DARLING 17126 SANTA CRUZ COURT YORBA LINDA, CA 92886---0000 15 48 26 DAVENPORT, ROBERT E KATHERINE L DAVENPORT 9064 THE LANE NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 22 48 26 DAVENPORT, ROBERT E & LYNETTE 9064 THE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---1554 22 48 26 DAVID G & GERALDINE J MAHANEY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 8880 SAVONA COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 DAVID L LANGENDORFER REV TRUST 9026 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---2000 15 48 26 DAVID R & M K STAUFFER JOINT REV LIVING TRUST 8620 AMOUR COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 DAVIS, ALBERTA MICHAEL FABIUS 1613 CORAL BAY DR SHUNIAH, ON CANADA P7A 0G4 23 48 26 DAWOOD, BONY R & NEELOFAR 2014 MOINTAIN PINE DR MECHANICSBURG, PA 17050---0000 15 48 26 DAY, LORNE 5600 W TIMBER OAK CT PEORIA, IL 61615---0000 15 48 26 DE VARONA, MARIA P MARIA DE VARONA 8284 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 1323 NAPLES, FL 34119---6813 27 48 26 DEBBS, KEVIN EDWARD 9684 MONTELANICO LOOP #203 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 15 48 26 DECAMP, ROBERT C & PAULA L 9440 BENVENUTO COURT #102 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 DECIUS, LIONEL & KAITLN 8264 KEY ROYAL CIR #814 NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 27 48 26 DEFREITAS, CAROLIN 8297 KEY ROYAL LN #335 NAPLES, FL 34119---6801 27 48 26 DEKEVICH, FRANCIS & DEBRA 8875 VACCARO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 DELALUZ, JULIO CESAR 8234 KEY ROYAL CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---6798 27 48 26 DENARDI, DEAN & TANYA D 9070 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 DENNIS E VACHON REV LIV TRUST SHIRLEY M VACHON REV LIV TRUST 9282 RIALTO LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 DENNIS F MOROZ TRUST 7 CRYSTAL BEND PO BOX 3 GLEN ARBOR, MI 49636---0000 22 48 26 DENOVA, EUGENE & ROSEANN 48 ROONEY ST CLIFTON, NJ 07011---1043 27 48 26 DESROCHERS, ROBERT LEWIS MARY MELINDA DESROCHERS 9053 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 DIANE CASARETO REV TRUST 8761 BELLANO CT #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 DIBENEDETTO, DARA & ROBERT 9570 COQUINA CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 DICKMAN, STEVEN & ELYSE 173 RT 46 ROCKAWAY, NJ 07866---0000 22 48 26 DINESEN, JESS W 4475 TAMARIND WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 DIRTY LARRYS LLC 2430 VANDERBILT BEACH RD # 346 NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 22 48 26 DIRTY LARRY'S LLC 5051 CASTELLO DRIVE #22 NAPLES, FL 34103---0000 22 48 26 DISTASIO FAMILY JT LIV TRUST 3124 SOUTH 60TH CT CICERO, IL 60804---0000 22 48 26 DOBRYDNEY, GLENN B ROSEMARIE F DOBRYDNEY 9143 TRIVOLI TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 DOCHERTY, DENNIS W 8807 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 DOMBROWSKI, DONALD ROSINA DOMBROWSKI 80 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9757 27 48 26 DONNA M MACLEAN REV TRUST 8757 BELLANO CT #102 NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 DONNELLY, ROBERT C 3 N PINE DRIVE MASSAPEQUA, NY 11758---0000 15 48 26 DONOGHUE, JEAN 9162 TRIVOLI TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 DONOVAN, DOUGLAS R & CATHY J 8775 BIRKDALE DR SUNBURY, OH 43074---0000 15 48 26 DOREY, JAMES A & MEGAN K 101 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 DORSEY, PAMELA F & GERARD E 217 NORTH HIGHLAND AVE #4202 OSSINING, NY 10562---0000 15 48 26 DOUGHERTY, THOMAS & ELENA 9420 BENVENUTO CT #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 DOUGLAS & ELIZABETH SEA TRUST 8005 WINDSWEPT CIRCLE SIOUX FALLS, SD 57108---0000 15 48 26 DOUGLAS WELLS REV TRUST 929 WILTSHIRE COURT SALINE, MI 48176---0000 22 48 26 DP1 PROPERTIES LLC 308 SPIDER LILY LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 DRAGOVITS, CHRIS & LEEANN 215 PRANCER RD EGG HBR TWP, NJ 08234---5938 27 48 26 DROEGE DREINER, DR ANNETTE K RINGELNATZSTR 24 KOEIN GERMANY 50996 15 48 26 DUERI BROTHERS COMPANY 7965 PRESERVE CIR APT 721 NAPLES, FL 34119---6732 27 48 26 DUGAN TR, GLORIA L DUGAN FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST UTD 12/13/01 4259 REDONDA LN NAPLES, FL 34119---7501 27 48 26 DUNFORD, MARK & KATHY 4559 SPRING VALLEY CIR MASON, OH 45040---0000 22 48 26 DURAND, STEPHEN E 313 SPIDER LILY LN NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 27 48 26 DURAN-HILL, DORIS 8271 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #912 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 DURINZI, JOSEPH F & DENISE M 8675 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 ECKSTEIN, VIKTOR JANA ECKSTEINOVA 8757 BELLANO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 EDDA CANTONI REV TRUST 8772 BELLANO CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 EILER, THOMAS W 303 CHESTNUT ST MICHIGAN CITY, IN 46360---6921 27 48 26 EIZAGAECHEVARRIA, JUAN A & ANA 3040 SW 187TH TER MIRAMAR, FL 33029---5848 27 48 26 ELLIOTT, CHARLES LAYTON BOBBI M ELLIOTT 714 WES COUNTY RD 450 S FRANKFORT, IN 46041---0000 15 48 26 ELLIOTT, KEITH M & SHELLEY M 3236 SHORELINE DR OAKVILLE, ON CANADA L6L 5Z1 15 48 26 ELMALEH, ELIE LISA LADOUCEUR 282 MONTEE CORTEREAL GASPE, QC CANADA G4X 6S2 27 48 26 EMANSKI, RICHARD L & JOANN M 9095 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 EMMONS, GREY M & LURIE S 7010 OREGON AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20015---0000 15 48 26 ERNST, MICHAEL F & DEANNE K 2407 RAVENVIEW ROAD TIMONIUM, MD 21093---0000 22 48 26 ERUK ITS LLC 450 ST ANDREWS COURT BROADVIEW HGTS, OH 44147---0000 15 48 26 ESPAILLAT, JOSE A & MERCEDES 400 E 52ND ST NEW YORK, NY 10022---6404 27 48 26 ESPAILLAT, JOSE A & MERCEDES 8297 KEY ROYAL LN NAPLES, FL 34119---6829 27 48 26 ESPESETH, RANDALL 9613 COBALT COVE NAPLES, FL 34120---4665 14 48 26 EUGENE GORSKI JR LIVING TRUST 17270 HIDDEN ESTATE CIRCLE FORT MYERS, FL 33908---0000 22 48 26 EVANICK, TEODORA MICHAEL EVANICK JR 8271 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #933 NAPLES, FL 34119---6817 27 48 26 EVELYN ARELLANO LLC 3620 6TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---0000 27 48 26 F DANIEL CASTE REV TRUST 62 WOODLAND DR PITTSBURGH, PA 15228---0000 22 48 26 FALIVENE, MARIA D 604 PHILADELPHIA BLVD SEA GIRT, NJ 08750---2504 27 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 5 of 21 FARRER, JOHN A & PAULA M 7 BALDWIN LANE HOLLIS, NH 03049---0000 22 48 26 FEDORYKA, MARIA M 8254 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 711 NAPLES, FL 34119---6808 27 48 26 FENECH FAMILY LIV TRUST 20980 SANTIA CT CLINTON TWP, MI 48038---0000 22 48 26 FENOUGHTY, SHAWN W DEANNA MICHELLE FENOUGHTY 1308 GREENSTONE COURT DANVILLE, IN 46122---0000 15 48 26 FERNANDEZ SEGURA, ANGEL BARBARA SORONDO SARZALEJO 46 MAXFIELD DR ORONO, ME 04473---0000 15 48 26 FERRANTI JR, ALBERT A KAREN W FERRANTI PO BOX 422 S GLASTONBURY, CT 06073---0000 22 48 26 FISCHER, BRIAN B 8304 KEY ROYAL CIR #1731 NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 27 48 26 FISCHER, RONALD P & LINDA M 8625 AMOUR COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 FISHER, GALE A & KIRK L 3790 BURNING TREE DR BLOOMFIELD, MI 48302---0000 15 48 26 FITZPATRICK, PATRICIA KYLE 8827 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 FIX, DAVID W & ALAYNE A 8656 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 FL WEST COAST INV LLC 2338 IMMOKALEE ROAD STE 374 NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 FL WEST COAST INV LLC 2338 IMMOKALEE ROAD STE 374 NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 FLAAEN, BRADLEY D & JOYCE C 920 CHAMPIONS FAIRWAY DR ALPHARETTA, GA 30004---0000 22 48 26 FLAMAX LLC 188 HILLCREST RD WATCHUNG, NJ 07069---6006 10 48 26 FLANAGAN, DAVID A & PATRICIA L 15 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE WALPOLE, MA 02081---0000 22 48 26 FLANAGAN, THOMAS M & TARA 328 MINEOLA BLVD MINEOLA, NY 11501---0000 15 48 26 FLEMING JR, ROBERT E 8298 KEY ROYAL LN APT 421 NAPLES, FL 34119---6800 27 48 26 FLOW WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT % JP WARD & ASSOCIATES LLC 2900 NE 12TH TER STE 1 OAKLAND PARK, FL 33334---0000 22 48 26 FLOW WAY COMMUNITY DEVELP DIST % JP WARD & ASSOCIATES LLC 2041 NE 6 TERRACE WILSON MANORS, FL 33305---0000 15 48 26 FOHRMAN, RONALD P & DONNA L 9251 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---2018 15 48 26 FOLEY, TIMOTHY E & KATHLEEN A 9467 GALLIANO TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 FONTDEVILA, ALFONSO & DIANE J 574 CORBEL DR NAPLES, FL 34110---1104 22 48 26 FONTDEVILLA, ALFONSO & DIANE J JOSE A=& ENRQUETA FONTDEVILLA 574 CORBEL DR NAPLES, FL 34110---1104 22 48 26 FORSELL, ANDREW CHARLES MARY LOUISE FORSELL 5 BERKELEY PL FREEHOLD, NJ 07728---0000 22 48 26 FOSTER, ROBERT B & PATRICIA A 9058 SORRENO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 FOUNTAIN, MICHAEL J & JODY B PO BOX 1706 PLATTSBURG, NY 12901---0000 27 48 26 FOWLER, BRYAN KEITH AMANDA SHAW 9678 MONTELANICO LOOP BLDG 14 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 FRANCES, SUSAN 88 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 FRANKLAND JR, JAMES D MARGARET A FRANKLAND 9697 COBALT COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4665 23 48 26 FRASER, KEVIN & TAMMIE 8773 BELLANO COURT #204 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 FRASZKA, TERESA M TADEUSZ IZABELLA MROZEK BARBARA VAN DUSEN 119 ANTRIM CRES LONDON, ON CANADA N6E 1G9 27 48 26 FRED W FAUST REV TRUST 8668 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 FREDDIE GENE BARRETT & NANCY ANNE BARRETT LIV TRUST 8772 BELLANO CT #203 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 GANDEE, ROBERT & LINDA M 8230 HERMITAGE RD CONCORD TWP, OH 44077---0000 22 48 26 GARCIA, PETER M & ERIN K 71 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9759 27 48 26 GARTNER, MICHAEL & COLLEEN 1847 RIDGE ROAD WEST SHANTY BAY, ON CANADA L0L 2L0 22 48 26 GASIMOVA, ALMAZ 6888 DEEPWOOD LANE CLEVELAND, OH 44143---0000 27 48 26 GAYNOR, ROBERT H & SHERRI 23 MEETING HOUSE LANE SOUTHBORO, MA 01772---0000 22 48 26 GELTEMEYER, SCOTT & JULIE 78 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9757 27 48 26 GEORGE, NATALIE 16242 RAVINA WAY NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 27 48 26 GEORGELOS, LOUIS P & LAURA M 8985 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---2001 22 48 26 GERMANO, PETER VICTOR FIABANE 214 LAUREL BLVD LONG BEACH, NY 11561---0000 27 48 26 GERSTEL, LAWRENCE G & KRISTI L 20 QUAKER ROAD SHORT HILLS, NJ 07078---0000 15 48 26 GIAMBRONE, JOSEPH A DEBORAH A GIAMBRONE 7619 ARBOR GLEN DRIVE VICTOR, NY 14564---0000 15 48 26 GILBERT, LARRY J & LINDA R 8765 BELLANO COURT UNIT 204 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 GIUSTINI INVESTMENTS INC 11600 ALBERT HUDON MONTREAL, QC CANADA H1G 3K2 27 48 26 GIUSTINI INVESTMENTS INC 11600 ALBERT HUDON MONTREAL, QC CANADA H1G 3K2 27 48 26 GLEASON, BARBARA J 8756 BELLANO CT #103 NAPLES, FL 34119---9687 22 48 26 GOLDSTONE, CRAIG SHARTIN REBECCA ANN GOLDSTONE 8773 BELLANO COURT #201 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 GOMEZ, CARLOS R AMANDA L FUENTES 8224 KEY ROYAL CIR #226 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 GONZALES, FERNANDO 112 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9758 27 48 26 GORSKI, MARK T & GRACE LYNN 11206 ROCKINGHAM CIRCLE FISHERS, IN 46037---0000 22 48 26 GOSKOLLI, ERNELA & ROLANDI 8298 KEY ROYAL LN APT 436 NAPLES, FL 34119---6821 27 48 26 GOUSSE, GREGORY C & ELAINE R 8757 BELLANO COURT #203 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 GRACE-KELLY LLC 100 ROSE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---9595 22 48 26 GRAEBNER, PAUL A & AMY A 8635 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 GRANT, DANIELLE P 750 PINE CONE LN NAPLES, FL 34104---5408 27 48 26 GRANT, LORI C 5902 BARCLAY LANE NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 27 48 26 GRATKOWSKI II, ROBERT WAYNE LYNN D GRATKOWSKI 2040 PAR DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0515 27 48 26 GRAVES, DEBRA A 207 N SHERIDAN AVE DELAND, FL 32720---0000 27 48 26 GRAY, JOHNNY C & TERRY E PO BOX 519 RUIDOSO, NM 88355---0000 15 48 26 GREEN GOLF REALTY LLC PO BOX 10101 NAPLES, FL 34108---0000 27 48 26 GREEN GOLF REALTY LLC PO BOX 110101 NAPLES, FL 34108---0000 27 48 26 GREENBERG, JOHN P & TAMA B 8757 BELLANO COURT #103 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 GRETCHEN S BECKER REV TRUST 8998 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 GRIEB, TODD J 8828 KEY ROYAL LN #1413 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 GRIEST, BARBARA W 34 MEADOWVIEW LANE MALVERN, PA 19355---0000 15 48 26 GRILLO, DORIS J JEFFREY J BERNS 17 ROZLYN COURT RED BANK, NJ 07701---0000 15 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 6 of 21 GRIMALDI, JOHN F & CATHERINE C 72 SETTLERS COURT BEDFORD, NH 03110---0000 22 48 26 GROSSIUS, GREGORY S 8297 KEY ROYAL LN APT 312 NAPLES, FL 34119---6801 27 48 26 GROSSO, ROBERT & SUSAN S 9013 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 GRUDNIEWSKI, JOZEF & GRAZYNA MONIKA BIGOSZEWSKI KATARZYNA MACLEOD 8285 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 1222 NAPLES, FL 34119---6815 27 48 26 GUSTAFSON, ROBERT A KELLY CALVERT GUSTAFSON 26 MIRAMICHI TRAIL MORGANTOWN, WV 26508---0000 22 48 26 GYURO, JESSE LISA R HOUSTON 100 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 H B & S H GREENFIELD JT/R/T 9445 LIVORNO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 H H & M S DAVIDSON FMLY TRUST 9466 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HADDAD, PAUL L 9774 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 23 48 26 HAIGLER III, JAMES S PO BOX 112288 NAPLES, FL 34108---0000 27 48 26 HALE LIVING TRUST P O BOX 1674 MORRISTOWN, TN 37816---0000 22 48 26 HALLER, THOMAS & CYNTHIA 1731 BEACON DR SANFORD, FL 32771---0000 27 48 26 HANCHARYK, WALTER JOSEPH CAROL GERALDINE HANCHARYK 2909 COULSON COURT MISSISSAUGA, ON CANADA L5M 5S8 15 48 26 HANDTE, GORDON C & CHERYL J 9018 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 HANNON, CATHERINE & KEVIN 8767 GAVANO ST E NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HANSEN, LAWRENCE & CAROL 502 CREEKSIDE DR MCKINNEY, TX 75071---0000 15 48 26 HANSON, RICHARD & TERRY 9063 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 HARDY, JOHN LESLIE CYNTHIA ANNE HARDY 9214 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---2018 15 48 26 HARMON, ELZA & PATRICIA J 9356 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 HARRIS, CATHY 8274 KEY ROYAL CIR #1013 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 HARRIS, JAMES B & JO ANN 9175 TRIVOLI TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 HARRY T BAUERLE III REV TRUST EVELYN D UNDERWOOD REV TRUST 8640 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HARTHMAN, AUSTIN E 5800 ARLINGTON AVE 9-A BRONX, NY 10471---0000 22 48 26 HASAN, NAIM SOFIA MUMTAZ 8629 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HASLETT, PHYLLIS L 6 DOUGLAS DR HOLMDEL, NJ 07733---0000 22 48 26 HATCHER, DAWN L P O BOX 111646 NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 HATCHER, MAXINE I 4190 BROKEN BACK RD NAPLES, FL 34119---9705 22 48 26 HECKLER, MARK A & VERONICA 272 BRUNTFIELD CT VALPARAISO, IN 46385---8010 23 48 26 HENNESSY, ROBERT J & MARY ANN 8891 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HENRY W & MARY A RAISER TRUST 515 NURSERY LN NAPLES, FL 34119---9721 22 48 26 HERNANDEZ-JAMARDO, MARGARITA R 2029 CRESTVIEW WAY #108 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 HETRICK, FRANK M 7241 HANOVER PARKWAY STE C GREENBELT, MD 20770---0000 27 48 26 HILDEBRANDT, MARK R BARBARA J HILDEBRANDT 9497 GALLIANO TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 15 48 26 HINNEN, JOHN & KATHY 8769 BELLANO COURT # 104 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HINTON, THOMAS T KRISTIN M MOTYKA 8887 SAVONA COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HOLLEY, CHARLES C & HEIDI 9230 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 HOROWITZ REVOCABLE TRUST 9074 SORRENO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HOSELTON, DANIEL P & KENDAL 24 NIGHTINGALE DR SPRINGFIELD, IL 62711---0000 15 48 26 HOURIHAN, JAMES P & DIANE M 1551 CENTER RD WEST SENECA, NY 14224---0000 22 48 26 HOUSEL, KEVAN M & JANICE J 8623 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HOWARD, CHANDLER 28 WAKEFIELD LN FARMINGTON, CT 06032---0000 22 48 26 HOWARD, THOMAS H & KERRY L 9134 TRIVOLI TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 HOWENSTINE, DAVID E KATHRYN N HOWENSTINE 6844 COVINGTON CREEK TRAIL FORT WAYNE, IN 46804---0000 15 48 26 HSIA, RICHARD Y PEIFANG ZHANG 21640 EAST BRIARWOOD DRIVE AURORA, CO 80016---0000 22 48 26 HUBER, CHARLES ANTHONY TRACYE LEE HUBER 8849 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HUBER, GREGORY A & JAN G 19314 RAKE RD BORDEN, IN 47106---0000 22 48 26 HUEMME, ROBERT D 9004 SORRENO CT NA;LES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HUNGERFORD, CHAD J & REBECCA J 2218 DERDALL DR BROOKINGS, SD 57006---0000 15 48 26 HUOT, MARK R & LAURA R 8663 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 HUTCHINSON, COLLIN CORY JACQUELYN M HUTCHINSON 77 DUNCAN PHYFE LANE SINGERLANDS, NY 12159---0000 22 48 26 HYATT, AMY B 73 BURNT PINE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 IBIS COVE MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN INC 8120 LOGAN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 IHRIG REVOCABLE TRUST 610 107TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108---0000 27 48 26 INFANTE, GISSA L 1070 GROVE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 27 48 26 IORIO, BARBARA 310 ROSE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 ISRAELITE FAMILY TRUST 8820 SAVONA COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 IULIANO, JOHN V & KAREN V 9146 TRIVOLI TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 J C & S D RAEUCHLE JT RV TRUST PO BOX 46 NEW LONDON, NH 03257---0000 27 48 26 J LEE REAL ESTATE LLC 13655 MESSINO CT ESTERO, FL 33928---0000 27 48 26 J R & P GIUFFRIDA REV TRUST 8826 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 J R MAKI & J C MAKI J/R TRUST 873 BRAHMS CT TROY, MI 48085---0000 15 48 26 JABION, DAVID I & PATRICIA M 42 ARBOR LANE DIX HILLS, NY 11746---0000 15 48 26 JABLON, ALAN & PATRICIA 18 CORNELL DR PLAINVIEW, NY 11803---0000 15 48 26 JABLONSKI, CRAIG R & DONNA R 9451 GALLIANO TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JACKSON JT REVOCABLE TRUST 8645 CAVANO STREET NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JACKSON, ERIC C & KIMBERLY M 5545 FERNBROOK LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55446---0000 15 48 26 JACOBS, DIANE L 1257 W GROVE ST GALESBURG, IL 61401---0000 27 48 26 JACOBS, MARTIN S & LINDA 9235 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---2006 15 48 26 JACOBSON, MICHAEL P CRISTINA L JACOBSON 8665 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 7 of 21 JAMES C RAEUCHLE LLC PO BOX 46 599 HALL FARM RD NEW LONDON, NH 03257---0046 27 48 26 JAMES FAMILY TRUST 8824 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JAMES H MAXEDON REV TRUST 8836 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JAMES L HADERER REV TRUST 9406 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 JAMES, DOUGLAS M & TAMARA A 2 BIRCH COURT UPPER SADDLE RIV, NJ 07458---0000 22 48 26 JAMEYSON, BRET A & NICOLE L 89 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9759 27 48 26 JANELL, MARY 9718 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4660 23 48 26 JANNONE, ROBERT M DIANE OCONNELL 31726 CARMINE DRIVE REHOBOTH BEACH, DE 19971---0000 22 48 26 JARBO, JAMES W AMANDA JARBO 75 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 JB ENTITIES LLC 6257 KLINES DRIVE GIRARD, OH 44420---0000 27 48 26 JEROME D KELLER TRUST 8777 CAVANO ST E NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JEZIORSKI, ALLAN RICHARD MICHELLE D JEZIORSKI 10700 MILLERS WAY ORLAND PARK, IL 60467---0000 15 48 26 JILL R AUSTIN TRUST 9165 ESPLANADE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 JIMENEZ, KRYSTLE GARCIA 8254 KEY ROYAL CIR #731 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 JOANNE C HOLT TRUST 9377 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JOANNE S VRANA REV TRUST 6322 WOODBRIDGE WASHINGTON, MI 48094---0000 22 48 26 JOHN A FARRER TRUST 7 BALDWIN LANE HOLLIS, NH 03049---0000 15 48 26 JOHN A FARRER TRUST 9426 BENVENUTO CT #103 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JOHN C MANG III REV LIV TRUST 8437 WILLOW HAVEN DR ST JOHN, IN 46373---0000 22 48 26 JOHN F HARRIS IV & KAREN J HARRIS JOINT LIVING TRUST 8764 BELLANO COURT #203 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JOHN J NEYLAN III &GAIL P NEYLAN REV TRUST 8647 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER L CECELI M JOHNSON 85 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9759 27 48 26 JOHNSON, DONNA M 9420 BENVENUTO COURT #103 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 JOHNSON, KIMBERLY ANN VICTOR LEE JOHNSON 105 WHISTLING STRAIT WASHINGTON, IL 61571---0000 15 48 26 JOHNSON, PATRICIA A 8734 CAVANO ST E NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JOHNSON, STACY L & PENNY R 9684 MONTELANICO LOOP #102 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 JOHNSON, STEVEN M & BRENDA L 55876 160TH ST WELLS, MN 56097---4210 27 48 26 JOHNSON, TAMMY 8750 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JONES SR, MICHAEL J 1720 WRIGHT SCHAUMBURG, IL 60193---0000 22 48 26 JONES, DAVID W & JAMA J 315 ROSE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---9723 22 48 26 JONES, RUSSELL & SANDRA 9369 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JONES, VICTOR F & LESLIE 9461 LIVORNO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JONES, WILLIAM D & SHERRY A 9696 COBALT COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4664 23 48 26 JONES, WILLIAM E ORRACHA PUMKAO-JONES 6513 AUTUMN WOODS BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 27 48 26 JONTE, MAYBEL 91 BURNT PINE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 JOSEPH J PESTANA III REV TRUST SUSAN PESTANA REV TRUST 17 GRANT DR BEDFORD, NH 03110---0000 22 48 26 JT NAPLES FLORIDA LP 3702 10 YONGE STREET TORONTO, ON CANADA M5E IR4 27 48 26 JUDITH C LATHAM &LAWRENCE E SMITH JT RES TRUST 8834 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 JUDITH LYNN MILLMAN TRUST 5415 WAYSIDE AVE CICINNATI, OH 45230---0000 22 48 26 JULIANO, ANNE 24201 WALDEN CENTER DRIVE UNIT 206 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0000 15 48 26 K & R HOMETECH LLC 8264 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 822 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 KALBFLEISCH FAMILY TRUST 554 BURLINGTON AVE BURLINGTON, ON CANADA L7S 1S1 22 48 26 KALINOWSKI, STEPHEN J 9684 MONTELANICO LOOP BLDG 13 #103 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 KANE FAMILY TRUST 61 OVERBROOK DR BINGHAMTON, NY 13901---0000 22 48 26 KARDYS, JACK C & DIANE PO BOX 378800 KEY LARGO, FL 33037---0000 11 48 26 KARDYS, JAMES 806 N 32ND CT HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---0000 11 48 26 KAREN FRENCH REV TRUST 8920 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KAREN S BURCAW WILCZAK TRUST 8761 BELLANO COURT #201 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KARENLEE L BARNES TRUST 9450 GALLIANO TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 KARPINSKI ET AL, JOSEPH F 331 PARK PL CALEDONIA, NY 14423---1130 10 48 26 KARPINSKI JR ET AL, JOSEPH F 79 BELLTOWER LN PITTSFORD, NY 14534---0000 10 48 26 KASPERSION FLORIDA TRUST 184 HIGHLAND CREEK ROAD WINNIPEG, MB CANADA R3Y 0K3 22 48 26 KATZ, MICHAEL RONALD EILEEN SULLIVAN-KATZ 8863 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KAUFMAN, JAY H & PHYLLIS 1218 HIGHLAND DR OREFIELD, PA 18069---0000 15 48 26 KAUFMANN, DANIEL G & BONNIE L 8769 BELLANO CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34119---9694 22 48 26 KAUFMANN, LORI L 7208 21ST AVE APT 2 EAST ELMHURST, NY 11370---0000 15 48 26 KAVANAGH PROPERTY TRUST 9684 MONTELANICO LOOP #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 KEATING JR, THOMAS J 10 MONICA COURT BRANCHBURG, NJ 08876---0000 15 48 26 KEEFE, KEVIN F & SANDRA 3 MARION LANE WOODBRIDGE, CT 06525---0000 22 48 26 KEGLE CONSLTG SRVS (KCS) INC 3184 CHAMBERLAIN CT MISSISSAUGA, ON CANADA L5N 3M2 15 48 26 KEIGHLEY, STEPHEN M 155 MEAGHER AVE BRONX, NY 10465---3401 27 48 26 KELSEY LIVING TRUST 9365 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KENNETH A ADAMS JR REV/L/TRUST 9356 RAPALLO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 KENNETH W MARTA REV TRUST FRANCES J MARTA 8760 BELLANO CT #104 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KESSLER, THOMAS & JACQUELINE 8919 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KEY ROYAL 8298 LLC 562 BLUEBERRY PL FRANKLIN LAKES, NJ 07417---0000 27 48 26 KEY ROYAL 832 LLC 50 WEST ST APT C1A HARRISON, NY 10528---4032 27 48 26 KEY ROYAL 836 LLC 50 WEST ST APT C1A HARRISON, NY 10528---4032 27 48 26 KEY ROYAL CONDOMINIUM ASSN INC 8204 KEY ROYAL CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---6724 27 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 8 of 21 KEY TOEYAL 634 LLC 50 WEST ST APT C1A HARRISON, NY 10528---4032 27 48 26 KILEY, BARBARA M 9440 BENVENUTO COURT #201 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 KINZELMANN, JOHN B GAIL STEAD KINZELMANN 2001 WINNERS CIRCLE CASTLETON, NY 12033---0000 22 48 26 KIRKBY, BRETT K & WENDY A 9723 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4661 23 48 26 KIRSCH, ROBERT W & GAIL P 2118 CENTRAL DR N EAST MEADOW, NY 11554---0000 22 48 26 KLAUSMANN, RICK & OKSANA 9862 COLUMBIA WAY BOLTON, ON CANADA L7E 0T2 27 48 26 KLECK, THOMAS L & JUDY A 8864 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KLEI, JEFFREY C & NANCY 54470 ROSELAWN CT SHELBY TWP, MI 48316---0000 22 48 26 KLEIN, MICHAEL S & JANET M 83 JACOB ST STATEN ISLAND, NY 10307---0000 15 48 26 KLUMPP, JOHN & CARLA 9021 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KMIECIAK, JOSEPH & HONONATA 99 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9759 27 48 26 KNAPP, ANTON & NANCY 21020 W WOODBURY CT HAWTHORN WOODS, IL 60047---0000 22 48 26 KNAUSE, TERRY D & LINDA J 108 LATOUR WAY GREER, SC 29650---0000 22 48 26 KNOTT FAMILY 2016 TRUST 9434 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KNUPPEL, ROBERT MARIA GORETH COPANSKI 8628 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 KOBZA, ANDREW J 8244 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #633 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 KOLES, CAROL A & JOHN V 9246 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 15 48 26 KOVACHEFF, STEVEN 12862 CARRINGTON CIR UNIT 101 NAPLES, FL 34105---5004 27 48 26 KOVAR, JIRI JANA KOVAROVA 9754 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4660 23 48 26 KOZAKIEWICZ, JOSEPH & JANET 54 BARNSWALLOW DRIVE TRUMBULL, CT 06611---0000 22 48 26 KOZON, ED & LINDA 1424 SIEBERT COURT NAPERVILLE, IL 60465---0000 22 48 26 KRCELIC, MARTIN S & CHERYL F 54 DUNBAR RD PALM BEACH GARDE, FL 33418---0000 22 48 26 KREPPEL, JOYCE 8908 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KRIVOSH, MICHAEL J PATRICIA J KRIVOSH 17479 CLIFTON BLVD LAKEWOOD, OH 44107---0000 22 48 26 KROLL, GEOFFREY & FRANK 25 WOODHOLME VILLAGE CT BALTIMORE, MD 21208---0000 22 48 26 KROLLMAN, RICHARD & DONNA L 7 BETTS DRIVE WASHINGTON XING, PA 18977---0000 22 48 26 KRS NAPLES LLC 8405 LAUREL LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---6790 27 48 26 KRUCZOWY, ROBERT & WENDY 8432 247TH ST BELLEROSE, NY 11426---1729 27 48 26 KSIAZEK, STANLEY K & CAROLYN S 9087 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KUNKLER, LAWRENCE F 8871 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KUNZE, GREGORY S & TONI ANN 55 BALDWIN RD PATTERSON, NY 12563---0000 22 48 26 KUPPERMAN, CHARLES M JUDITH L KUPPERMAN 9075 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 KURTH, JOE E 2400 LINWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 22 48 26 KUTTNER, RAYMOND FRANKLIN PAMELA VANDERKLIP 8285 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 1214 NAPLES, FL 34119---6815 27 48 26 KWARTLER , HENRY & LORRIE A 39 MERIWETHER TRAIL CONGERS, NY 10920---0000 22 48 26 L M & L J REYNOLDS REV TRUST 216 BRIARCLIFF AVE WARWICK, RI 02889---0000 15 48 26 LAFEMINA, ALFRED P 8294 KEY ROYAL CIR #1631 NAPLES, FL 34119---6803 27 48 26 LAFEMINA, ALFRED P 8294 KEY ROYAL CIR #1631 NAPLES, FL 34119---6803 27 48 26 LAMERS, PHILIP M MARLES ANN LAMERS 9025 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LAMON, DAVID M & MARY M 9442 GALLIANO TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LANA M PORTER LIVING TRUST 0S87 AUTUMN WOODS LN ELBURN, IL 60119---0000 22 48 26 LAND TRUST NO 1227 2272 AIRPORT RD S # 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 22 48 26 LAND TRUST NO 1227 3003 TAMIAMI TRL N#200 NAPLES, FL 34103---0000 22 48 26 LANGHORST, AXEL 32 WEST AVE ESSEX, CT 06426---1138 27 48 26 LAPOINTE, BEVERLY 6715 YACHT BOULEVARD CORNWALL, ON CANADA K6H 7N6 22 48 26 LARRY B STOLLER TRUST 9019 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 LAST, GREGORY 8214 KEY ROYAL CIR #135 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 LAUREL LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC % MMI 28731 S CARGO CT UNIT 6 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---1810 27 48 26 LAUREL LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 8230 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES, FL 34119---9718 27 48 26 LAUREL LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC C/O GUARDIAN PROPERTY MGMT 6704 LONE OAK BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109---6834 27 48 26 LAVERY, ROBERT E & CAROL G 8819 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 LAWLOR, ROBERT J & AMELIA W 735 HAMILTON RD BRYN MAWR, PA 19010---0000 22 48 26 LAWRENCE D GREENE REV TRUST SUSAN D GREENE REV TRUST 8777 BELLANO COURT #204 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LAWRIE, DOUGLAS MOIRA MCINTYRE 8760 BELLANO COURT # 203 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LE, BA LINH 7384 GLAMORGAN WAY MISSISSAUGA, ON CANADA L5N 7Z4 27 48 26 LEARY, MICHAEL ROBERT ROSEMARY LEARY 501 MERINGER PLACE SIMPSONVILLE, SC 29680---0000 22 48 26 LEITER, GARY F 9462 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LEKA, MATILDA 8294 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #1634 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 LEMM, JOHN E & DANETTE M 15356 W OAK SPRING ROAD LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048---0000 15 48 26 LENTZ, JEFFREY P & SUSAN J 4021 SCHAEFFER DRIVE WALNUTPORT, PA 18088---0000 14 48 26 LENTZ, THOMAS E KATHLEEN EGAN LENTZ 9381 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LEONARDO, STEPHEN M 70 EDGEMERE DR ROCHESTER, NY 14612---0000 22 48 26 LESLIE, ERIK & WANDA 9011 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 LEVINE, EDWARD H & ALMA M 9167 TRIVOLI TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 LEVINE, ROBERT S & JUDITH E 9226 RIALTO LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 LIGAS, JACQUELINE J 8254 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 724 NAPLES, FL 34119---6808 27 48 26 LIGHTSEY, EDDIE L 8770 CAVANO STREET EAST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LILLISTON, BRENT F CHARLES J WELLER 8682 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LINK, TERRENCE H & KATHLEEN M 428 PHEASANT RUN WADSWORTH, OH 44281---0000 22 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 9 of 21 LISA SANFELIPPO LIVING TRUST 9746 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4660 23 48 26 LITOS, VASILIOS 1087 MAPLE LN NEW HYDE PARK, NY 11040---2305 27 48 26 LITTLE, STEPHEN G & PAMELA J 415 FOUNTAINVIEW DR IRVING, TX 75039---3653 22 48 26 LIU & LIN HOLDINGS LLC 245 BACKWATER CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LIU, YUN DI 245 BACKWATER CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LOMNICKY, LORI A 823 96TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108---2465 27 48 26 LONIESKI, GARY MICHAEL B ROMANO 8610 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LOUIS C MILAZZO JR LIV TRUST 8214 KEY ROYAL CIR #126 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 LOVELIDGE, ROGER W 8285 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #1224 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 LOVELL, JAMES H & SUSAN G 9482 GALLIANO TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LOVERUDE, JOHN T DANA J SAPETTI 9457 LIVORNO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LOZZI, ANOTHONY & CELESTE 1925 PAR DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0517 27 48 26 LOZZI, ANTHONY & CELESTE 1925 PAR DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0517 27 48 26 LUCIEN POULIOT LIVING TRUST 1340 BOUL DES CHUTES #504 QUEBEC, QC CANADA G1E 0K6 22 48 26 LUNDELL, CHRIS BENJAMIN SUSAN MARY LUNDELL 1005 PRINCE PHILLIP DR DUBUQUE, IA 52003---0000 22 48 26 LUNDGREN TR, DENNIS A CAROL B LUNDGREN TR DENNIS A LUNDGREN REV TRUST CAROL B LUNDGREN REV TRUST 9700 COBALT COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4666 23 48 26 LYNCH, BRIAN J & ANNE P 11 RENDALL RD WEST ROXBURY, MA 02132---0000 14 48 26 LYNCH, JOHN ROBERT 8757 BELLANO CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 LYNN E NEW TRUST 9105 ESPLANADE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 M & R JOHNSON REV TRUST 2 KELLY ANN DRIVE LANCASTER, NY 14086---1413 27 48 26 MACDONALD, ALAN & LINDA 28 ROTHESAY PARK RD ROTHESAY, NB CANADA EZE 5 15 48 26 MACDOUGALL, MOLLY 8781 CAVANO ST E NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MACKIN, KENNIE L & LORRAINE K 1 COLUMBIA DR TINTON FALLS, NJ 07724---9714 27 48 26 MACKO, CHRISTOPHER J & JEANNE 22 PARTRIDGE COURT RAMSEY, NJ 07446---0000 22 48 26 MADDRY, PAUL A & KRISTIN L P O BOX 112619 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MAFFEI, MASSIMO S 11128 PALMETTO RIDGE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 27 48 26 MAGOULIOTIS, VASILEIOS THERESA MAGOULIOTIS 9502 SW 127TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33186---1808 27 48 26 MAIELLA, JOSEPH A & LILIANA A 8865 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MAIORANA, NICHOLAS & LINDA F 120 QUEENS LANE CANFIELD, OH 44406---0000 27 48 26 MAKRIS, GEORGIA 8079 IBIS COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---7749 27 48 26 MALHOTRA, YOGESH & NEELAM 8856 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MALSTROM, RONALD A & EILEEN P 9434 GALLIANO TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MANCUSO, VAN E & JAN 8690 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 MANI, MARY ELIZABETH 8839 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MANKIN, KELLY L MICHAEL A TONDA 404 HENDRIE BLVD ROYAL OAK, MI 48067---0000 15 48 26 MARIN, CARLOS FREEDOM L TEAGUE 8214 KEY ROYAL CIR #134 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 MARINO, JOHN J & ALVERA 9418 GALLIANO TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MARK P MILLER TRUST PO BOX 101 GOLF, IL 60029---0000 22 48 26 MARK S JOHNSON REV TRUST 8993 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MARRANCA, MICHAEL D & SANDRA A NAPLES LLC 20 CROWN POINTE LANE WILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221---0000 22 48 26 MARSALLI, MICHAEL & NATALIE E 8483 HOLLOW BROOK CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---9724 27 48 26 MARTELL, KENNETH R DOROTHY K MARTELL 8916 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MARTHA S O'REILLY LIVING TRUST 9438 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MARTIN, DOUGLAS L & TERI A 9086 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MARTINES, PATRICIA B JOHANNA M ABAHOONIE 9420 BENVENUTO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 MARTORANA, ANTHONY J LOUISE ANN MARTORANA 8851 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MARTORINA, IGNAZIO & PAULETTE 1166 W GRAND AVE CHICAGO, IL 60642---8234 10 48 26 MARY T POTENZO 2015 TRUST 9472 LIVORNO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MARY W MARCOTTE TRUST 15274 CLUB COURSE DR BATH, MI 48808---0000 14 48 26 MARYROSE KARDYS LIV TRUST 806 N 32ND CT HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021---6130 11 48 26 MAURER, DAVID P WALTER J MAURER JR MAUREEN C JOHNSON PMB 22261 PO BOX 48 HARTFORD, VT 05047---0000 27 48 26 MAZZIOTTI, TRACY 9430 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MCC LAND TRUST 8285 KEY ROYAL CIR 1234 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 MCCARTHY, RICHARD MARGARET E SOMERSERT 20 TERRACE DR CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424---0000 22 48 26 MCDERMOTT JR, FRANK V BRENDA M MCDERMOTT P O BOX 72 RYE BEACH, NH 03871---0000 22 48 26 MCGEE JR, WILLIAM L GERALDINE M MCGEE 8674 AMOUR COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MCGREGOR, DANIEL D & LYNN M 9256 RIALTO LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 MCGUIRE, MICHAEL & JOANNE 9274 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 MCKENDRICK, STEPHEN JOHN EVA K MCKENDRICK 211 FORREST AVE #3 NARBERTH, PA 19072---0000 22 48 26 MCKERCHER, PAUL & LAURIE 12 SANDSTONE CT INVERARY, ON CANADA K0H 1X0 22 48 26 MCKERNON, KENT G 31 NORTHWOODS RD LAKE LUZERNE, NY 12846---3121 27 48 26 MCLAUGHLIN FAMILY TRUST 8769 BELLANO COURT UNIT 101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MCPARTLAND, JAMES F & DENISE C SEAN JAMES MCPARTLAND 2614 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #710 NAPLES, FL 34103---0000 22 48 26 MCSHANE, HAROLD B MICHELLE NULTY 10 WASHINGTON STREET UNIT 3 CHARLESTOWN, MA 02129---0000 22 48 26 MEACHAM, GREGORY DEAN KIMBERLEY WALL MEACHAM 8915 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---9574 22 48 26 MEHTA, NANDINI 8294 KEY ROYAL CIR # 1622 NAPLES, FL 34119---6803 27 48 26 MEIER, THOMAS H 8234 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 515 NAPLES, FL 34119---6798 27 48 26 MELLORS, JOHN & KATHLEEN 9154 TRIVOLI TERR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 MELSHEIMER, MARK & DAWN 123 TROFAS WAY OCEAN CITY, NJ 08226---0000 27 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 10 of 21 MENASCHE, MICHAEL 9420 BENVENUTO CT #204 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 MESIHA, TAMER GEORGEY 8264 KEY ROYAL CR #826 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 MESSINA, LAURIE 9488 GALIANO TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MEUNIER, PAUL H CATHY R STROUTSOS 227 FOX RUN COLCHESTER, VT 05446---0000 27 48 26 MEYER, MARTIN & ALICE 265 E 66TH ST APT 32G NEW YORK, NY 10065---0000 22 48 26 MICALIZZI, DAVID J & KALLIOPE 43 8TH ST UNIT 3519 CHARLESTOWN, MA 02129---0000 22 48 26 MICHAEL S FULLER REV TRUST 8984 ARREZO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MILES, GENE E & CHERYL 11 GREEN HILLS COURT GREENTOWN, IN 46936---0000 15 48 26 MILK, WENDY 8271 KEY ROYAL CIR #934 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 MILLER, DENNIS & LAURA 112 GREENRIDGE DR CADILLAC, MI 49601---9789 27 48 26 MILLER, ELEANOR J 8297 KEY ROYAL LN #311 NAPLES, FL 34119---6801 27 48 26 MILLER, LAWRENCE & SUSAN 9031 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 MIRECKI, JULIUS H 27430 FORSYTHIA DR COLUMBIA STATION, OH 44028---9745 27 48 26 MOCO, FERNANDA M FLORINDA M MENDES 53 NELLIE ROAD NEW BEDFORD, MA 02740---0000 15 48 26 MOLO, MARK E & MAUREEN L 1000 MAIN ST DUBUQUE, IA 52001---0000 15 48 26 MONTGOMERY, THOMAS KIM SAW MONTGOMERY 8345 BIG ACORN CIR APT 602 NAPLES, FL 34119---6786 27 48 26 MOORE, STEPHEN A DIANE M TOKARSKY 1939 MONTEREY DR MECHANICSBURG, PA 17050---0000 22 48 26 MORALES, CARIDAD L SUZETTE DE ARMAS 15976 SW 15TH ST PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33027---5056 27 48 26 MORGIGNO, FRANK D & ROSANNA F 22 VENETO LANE E SETAUKET, NY 11733---0000 22 48 26 MORITZ, NATALIE 8294 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #1621 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 MORRELL, JAMES & AMY R 715 OSCEOLA AVE SAINT PAUL, MN 55105---0000 15 48 26 MORRIS, NANCY M 32 RUTLAND ST UNIT 3R BOSTON, MA 02118---0000 22 48 26 MORRISSEAU, JOHN & ANNMARIE 8307 LAUREL LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 MOSHIDES, JOHN & SUSAN M 8080 FLOSS LANE EAST AMHERST, NY 14051---0000 22 48 26 MOSSIEN, ALLEN A & BRIDGET A 17 BADER LANE GLASTONBURY, CT 06033---0000 22 48 26 MOUNAYER, SAMI & DUNIA 400 STONERIDGE LANE BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48302---0000 22 48 26 MOYNIHAN, KELLY J & KATHRYN 9250 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 MULLEN, ROBERT J & ANNE C 18 AUTUMN CR HINGHAM, MA 02043---0000 22 48 26 MULLMAN, SEYMOUR & CHERYL 65 REDWOOD ROAD SPRINGFIELD, NJ 07081---0000 22 48 26 MULRY, THOMAS B & SUSAN M 3340 3RD AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0000 27 48 26 MULRY, THOMAS B & SUSAN M 3430 3RD AVENUE SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0000 27 48 26 MUMA, LENNY LEE 8867 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MURRAY JR, PATRICK J MICHELE L MURRAY 255 BOXWOOD LANE BRIDGEWATER, MA 02324---0000 15 48 26 MURRAY R SAVAGE TRUST 8686 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MURRAY, MELISSA S 9008 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 MYERS TRUST 9452 LIVORNO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 NAGEL, CHARLES LEE SCYLLA TRAD STANCLIFF NAGEL 8730 CAVANO ST E NAPLES, FL 34119---9834 22 48 26 NANCY F HARTIGAN TRUST 1202 MAGNOLIA DRIVE WAYLAND, MA 01778---0000 22 48 26 NANCY S HEET TRUST 800 TENBY TERRACE MANCHESTER, MA 63011---0000 15 48 26 NAPLES BAY RENTAL LLC 5765 HIDDEN OAKS LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 NAPLES BAY RENTAL LLC 5765 HIDDEN OAKS LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 NAPLES BLUE PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 110101 NAPLES, FL 34108---0000 27 48 26 NAPLES GREEN PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 110101 NAPLES, FL 34108---0000 27 48 26 NAPLES GREEN PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 110101 NAPLES, FL 34108---0000 27 48 26 NAPLES WELL DRILLING INC 5790 WAXMYRTLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---5931 22 48 26 NAPLES WELL DRILLING INC 5790 WAXMYRTLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---5931 22 48 26 NATALIZIO, JAMES RICHARD KRISTIN M NATALIZIO W343 N6451 BAYVIEW RD OCONOMOWOC, WI 53066---0000 15 48 26 NEAL TR, LEONARD E NANCY G NEAL TR LEONARD E NEAL TRUST NANCY G NEAL TRUST 1701 SW BOXWOOD LN DALLAS, OR 97338---2395 27 48 26 NELSON J HERNANDEZ &DUBRASKA J CORREA LLC 15275 COLLIER BLVD #338 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 NELSON, WAYNE B SHIRLEY J TRUBAC 9386 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 NEMETH JR, WILLIAM A & LAURA D 6301 MANOR GLEN DR MEDINA, OH 44256---0000 22 48 26 NEUMAN, ROBERT & MARGARET E 8244 KEY ROYAL CIR #616 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 NICHOLAS W GENIMATAS REV TRUST 15 PICKERING BROOK DRIVE GREENLAND, NH 03840---0000 22 48 26 NIXON, ERIK & ELIZABETH 8479 HOLLOW BROOK CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 NNF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE 1885 VETERANS PARK DR NAPLES, FL 34109---0492 22 48 26 NNF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE 1885 VETERANS PARK DR NAPLES, FL 34109---0492 22 48 26 NNF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE 1885 VETERANS PARK DR NAPLES, FL 34109---0492 22 48 26 NOAH, MICHAEL D & PAMELA J 8907 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 NODDIN FAMILY TRUST 9454 GALLIANO TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 NOE, PEGGY J 5201 CYPRESS LN NAPLES, FL 34113---7709 22 48 26 NOE, PEGGY J 5201 CYPRESS LN NAPLES, FL 34113---7709 22 48 26 NOE, PEGGY J 5201 CYPRESS LN NAPLES, FL 34113---7709 22 48 26 NOLEK, DONALD J & KATHLEEN V 8847 VACCARO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 NOWAK, PAUL B & MARY C 3994 S WOODHILL LANE NEW BERLIN, WI 53151---0000 22 48 26 OAR JR, WILLIAM E & MINDY K 7773 AROLLA PINE BLVD SARASOTA, FL 34240---1411 27 48 26 OATEN, PHILLIP J & KATHLEEN 9067 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 OCONNOR, FRANCIS G & JANET L 7305 SCARLET OAK COURT FAIRFAX STATION, VA 22039---0000 22 48 26 O'CONNOR, GARY MURIELL LEGER O'CONNOR 9389 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 OGORMAN, CASEY P & LORI J 1025 AUBURN DRIVE BROOKFIELD, WI 53045---0000 22 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 11 of 21 OLDAG, THOMAS G & PAULA J 9559 COQUINA CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 OLDE CYPRESS MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT 9150 GALLERIA CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 21 48 26 O'LEARY, NOEL & JULIA 8861 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 OLESZCZUK, BRUCE A 9422 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 OLIVEROS, SANTIAGO ANDRES 8214 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #131 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 OLIVIC FAMILY TRUST 8681 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 OLSHEFSKY, NANCY IRENE L NIRMAIER 8285 KEY ROYAL CIR #1212 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 O'MALLEY, MICHAEL P & DEBBIE A 9042 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 O'NEILL JR, JAMES R REGINA E BARRETT 9138 TRIVOLI TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 ONEILL, TIMOTHY & PAULA 9329 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 ORLICH, CHADWICK M JACQUELINE PATRICK 8298 KEY ROYAL LANE 423 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 ORTEGA, BENJAMIN RODRIGUEZ 8234 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #525 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 OSHAUGHNESSY FAMILY TRUST 8 CANTERBURY LANE BEDFORD, NH 03110---0000 22 48 26 O'SHEA, DANNY J & OLYMPIA 2 BRADLEY LANE MONTVALE, NJ 07645---0000 22 48 26 OZTURK, TAMER & IYA 8224 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #236 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 P & S ENTERPRISES LLC 2130 ROLLING MEADOWS DR NE WARREN, OH 44484---1672 27 48 26 P & S ENTERPRISES LTD % SUSHMA MEHTA & PARESH MEHTA 2130 ROLLING MEADOWS DR NE WARREN, OH 44484---1672 27 48 26 P & S ENTERPRISES LTD 2130 ROLLING MEADOWS DR NE WARREN, OH 44484---1672 27 48 26 PACKEVICIUS, ERIKA 11103 VISTA DRIVE LAGRANGE, IL 60525---0000 22 48 26 PADRON, MARTA P O BOX 133473 HIALEAH, FL 33013---0000 27 48 26 PADUREAN, ADRIAN M & MIRELA S 8768 BELLANO CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 PAFFENDORF, RANAE 7004 PINE BREEZE LN ST AUGUSTINE, FL 32086---4819 22 48 26 PALMIERI, VINCENT & CINDY 13 WEEPING CHERRY LANE COMMACK, NY 11725---0000 22 48 26 PAMELA S LENON REV TRUST THOMAS P SUTTON 8850 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 PANARELLO, DONNA L 9614 COBALT COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 PANTALEO JR, ANTHONY & RENEE M 9 LAUREN AVE DIX HILLS, NY 11746---0000 22 48 26 PARKHURST, WESLEY ALLEN BETTY JANE PARKHURST 9234 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 PARKLANDS ASSOCIATES I LLLP 1600 SAWGRASS CORPRT PKWY #400 SUNRISE, FL 33323---0000 9 48 26 PARKLANDS ASSOCIATES I LLLP 1600 SAWGRASS CPRPRT PKWY # 400 SUNRISE, FL 33323---0000 9 48 26 PARKLANDS ASSOCIATES O LLLP 1600 SAWGRASS CORPRT PKWY # 400 SUNRISE, FL 33323---0000 9 48 26 PARTYKA, DAVID L & DIANA B 8757 BELLANO COURT #202 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 PASCHKE, MARK H & CHERYL D H 9574 COQUINA CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 PAT BRANDONISIO & MARINA M BRANDONISIO 2014 REV TRUST 512 FOX RUN LANE HAMPSHIRE, IL 60140---9638 27 48 26 PATEL, VISHAL P NISHA P WARRIER 9141 ESPLANADE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 PATRIGNANI, ALAN & MARCIA 9275 RIALTO LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 PAUL E NOBLE JR TRUST PO BOX 156 NANTUCKET, MA 02554---0000 22 48 26 PAULGUSTA LLC 11103 VISTA DR LAGRANGE, IL 60525---0000 22 48 26 PEASE, TERRI J ROLF NORMANDIN 17 BAY BERRY LN SS1 NIAGRA ON THE LA, ON CANADA L0S1J0 22 48 26 PEBBLEBROOK LAKES MASTER ASSOCIATION INC 8610 PEBBLEBROOKE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9715 27 48 26 PEBBLEBROOKE LAKES MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % SENTRY MANAGEMENT 2180 WEST SR 434 #5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0000 27 48 26 PEBBLEBROOKE LAKES MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % SENTRY MANAGEMENT 2180 WEST SR 434 #5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---9715 27 48 26 PEBBLEBROOKE LAKES MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT 2180 WEST SR 434 #5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0000 27 48 26 PEBBLEBROOKE LAKES MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT 2180 WEST SR 434 #5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0000 27 48 26 PEBBLEBROOKE LAKES MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT 2180 WEST SR 434 #5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0000 27 48 26 PECCI, SCOTT N & DONNA 111 W WACKER DR #4104 CHICAGO, IL 60601---0000 15 48 26 PECKHAM, LARRY D & SUSAN W 8816 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 PECORARO, ANTHONY MARTHA HELEN PECORARO 9719 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 23 48 26 PEGNATO, ROBERT J ROSALINDA C PEGNATO 9027 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 PELLETIER, RAYMOND C & LISA 4787 OAK LEAF DR NAPLES, FL 34119---8575 22 48 26 PELLETIER, RAYMOND C & LISA 4787 OAK LEAF DR NAPLES, FL 34119---8575 22 48 26 PENNINO, DEL A LISA ANN GRAHAM 9414 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 PERDOMO, SARA M 8271 LAUREL LAKES WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---6793 27 48 26 PERDOMO, SARAH MAIDEL 8271 LAUREL LAKES WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---6793 27 48 26 PERELSTEIN, BRIAN S JENNIFER L PERELSTEIN 135 VIA FORESTA LANE WILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221---0000 22 48 26 PERROTHERS, RALPH F & MARIE C 71 FAIRFIELD AVE WEST CALDWELL, NJ 07006---7603 27 48 26 PERRY, DANIEL G & CARLA J 68978 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 PETERS, JERRY L & KARI A 9446 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 PETRARCA, JUSTINO D 500 W SUPERIOR UNIT 2706 CHICAGO, IL 60654---0000 15 48 26 PETRAS, CHARLES M & SHEILA M 9262 RIALTO LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 PF POINCIANA LLC % SCOTT TRUE 308 SPIDER LILY LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 PHELPS, JEFFREY J-& SUSAN R 9473 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 PIASEK ENTERPRISES LLC 13770 PONDVIEW CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 PITT, WILLIAM R & MICHELLE M 8853 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 PITTENGER, PERRY & SUZANNE 2 IVERSON CT ROCKAWAY, NJ 07866---0000 22 48 26 PLACE, PATTI LYNN 8287 KEY ROYAL LN APT 1514 NAPLES, FL 34119---6802 27 48 26 PLATYPUS PROPERTIES SUB-III LLC 11623 USEPPA CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 27 48 26 POGYOR, ROBERT & LOIS 8768 BELLANO COURT # 101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 POPIOL, LEONARDO INES MOTA 1544 WINTERBERRY LN WESTON, FL 33327---0000 27 48 26 PORTSCHER, DAVID P 8214 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #121 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 12 of 21 QUARRY COMM DEV DISTRICT % SPECIAL DIST SERVICES 27499 RIVERVIEW CENTER BLVD UNIT # 253 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY COMM DEV DISTRICT % SPECIAL DIST SERVICES 27499 RIVERVIEW CENTER BLVD UNIT # 253 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY COMM DEV DISTRICT % SPECIAL DIST SERVICES 27499 RIVERVIEW CENTER BLVD UNIT # 253 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY COMM DEV DISTRICT % SPECIAL DIST SERVICES 27499 RIVERVIEW CENTER BLVD UNIT # 253 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY COMM DEV DISTRICT % SPECIAL DIST SERVICES 27499 RIVERVIEW CENTER BLVD UNIT # 253 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0000 23 48 26 QUARRY COMM DEV DISTRICT % SPECIAL DIST SERVICES 27499 RIVERVIEW CENTER BLVD UNIT # 253 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0000 23 48 26 QUARRY COMM DEV DISTRICT 1801 LEE RD STE 255 WINTER PARK, FL 32789---2129 14 48 26 QUARRY COMMUNITY ASSN INC % FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL 8975 KAYAK DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY COMMUNITY ASSN INC % FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL 8975 KAYAK DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY COMMUNITY ASSN INC % FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL 8975 KAYAK DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION % FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL 8975 KAYAK DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 23 48 26 QUARRY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION % FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL 8975 KAYAK DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION % FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL 8975 KAYAK DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 23 48 26 QUARRY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION % FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL 8975 KAYAK DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION % FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL 8975 KAYAK DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION % FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL 8975 KAYAK DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION % FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL 8975 KAYAK DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY GOLF CLUB INC 8950 WEATHERED STONE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 QUARRY GOLF CLUB INC 8950 WEATHERED STONE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 QUEENAN, MICHAEL JOSEPH KAREN ANN QUEENAN 9111 TRIVOLI TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 QUINTANA, NOEL 5810 HIDDEN OAK LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 QUINTANA, NOEL 5810 HIDDEN OAK LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 QUINTANA, NOEL 5810 HIDDEN OAKS LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 QUINTANA, NOEL 5810 HIDDEN OAKS LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 QUINTANA, NOEL 5810 HIDDEN OAKS LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 QUINTANA, NOEL 5810 HIDDEN OAKS LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 QUINTANA, NOEL 5810 HIDDEN OAKS LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 QUINTANA, NOEL 5810 HIDDEN OAKS LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 QUINTANA, NOEL 5810 HIDDEN OAKS LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 QUINTUS, ROELOF 8756 BELLANO COURT #204 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 QUINTUS, ROELOF 8860 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 QUIROGA, ADELAIDE 23 HURON ST PROVIDENCE, RI 02908---4601 27 48 26 R D & C L BIRON REV TRUST 8862 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 R D AGRONIN REVOCABLE TRUST B R AGRONIN REVOCABLE TRUST 9163 TRIVOLI TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 R E & VERA MILLER REV TRUST 8670 AMOUR COURT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 RACIOPPO, CARLO G MARY COGLIANO 61 CROOKED STICK ROAD VAUGHN, ON CANADA L4K 1P4 15 48 26 RAFALOFF, HOWARD F & CAROL 8735 CAVANO ST E NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 RAISER, THOMAS J 4121 1ST AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---2640 22 48 26 RAMIREZ FAMILY TRUST 8855 LELY ISLAND CIR NAPLES, FL 34113---2609 27 48 26 RAMSAY, PETER F & SANDRA J 9750 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 23 48 26 RANDO FAMILY REV TRUST 9017 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---2002 22 48 26 RANDY SCOTT SLATER LIV TRUST 8822 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 RASMUSSEN, PATRICIA G 9458 GALLIANO TER NAPLES, FL 34119---2012 22 48 26 RC FLORIDA HOLDINGS LLC 8405 LAUREL LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 RC FLORIDA HOLDINGS LLC 8405 LAUREL LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 RC FLORIDA HOLDINGS LLC 8405 LAUREL LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 READY REVOCABLE TRUST 24 ISLAND ROCK PLYMOUTH, MA 02360---0000 22 48 26 RECAGNO, KEIRON & LISA 1204 SUMMERLEA STREET OAKVILLE, ON CANADA L6L 2M1 27 48 26 REFERENCE ONLY BELLANO I AT ESPLANADE NAPLES A CONDOMINIUM 22 48 26 REFERENCE ONLY BELLANO II AT ESPLANADE NAPLES A CONDOMINIUM 22 48 26 REFERENCE ONLY BENVENUTO I AT ESPLANADE NAPLES A CONDOMINIUM 15 48 26 REFERENCE ONLY COACH HOMES I ON MONTELANICO AT ESPLANADE A CONDOMINIUM 15 48 26 REFERENCE ONLY KEY ROYAL A CONDOMINIUM 27 48 26 REILLY, PETER W & JOAN M 90 BERRY ROAD MONROE, NY 10950---0000 27 48 26 RENE RICHARD REVOCABLE TRUST HARRIET RICHARD REV TRUST 8846 VACCARO COURT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 RESNICK, GARY & ELLEN 9268 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 REXROAT STEELE, LISA C 1644 CANOPY CHASE BROOKHAVEN, GA 30319---0000 15 48 26 RICHARDS, TODD M & MARYANN 2343 KENSINGTON DRIVE COLUMBUS, OH 43221---0000 22 48 26 RICHEY, LINDA C 4 MORNINGSIDE DR N #104 WESTPORT, CT 06880---0000 15 48 26 RIDINGER, JAMES & AMY 3088 STRADA BELLA COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 RIDINGER, JAMES & AMY 3088 STRADA BELLA COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 RIEP, FRITS W & GAIL L 9333 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 RINGLAND, DENNIS J JACQUELINE LIPTON 9325 TERRESINA COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 RITA D DAVIS REV TRUST 9606 COBALT COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4664 14 48 26 RIVERSTONE AT NAPLES HOA INC 1600 SAWGRASS CORP PKWY #400 SUNRISE, FL 33323---0000 16 48 26 RIVERSTONE AT NAPLES HOA INC 1600 SAWGRASS CORP PKWY #400 SUNRISE, FL 33323---0000 16 48 26 RIVERSTONE AT NAPLES HOA INC 1600 SAWGRASS CORP PKWY #400 SUNRISE, FL 33323---0000 16 48 26 RIVIERE, GEORGE W & SUSAN M 9685 MONTELANICO LOOP #102 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 ROBERT KINNEAR & HOLLY A KINNEAR JT DEC OF TRUST 21 WAVERLY LANE GROSSE PTE FARMS, MI 48237---0000 22 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 13 of 21 ROBINSON IV, CHARLES A PATRICIA A ROBINSON 703 FIELDSTONE CT INVERNESS, IL 60010---0000 15 48 26 RODRIGUEZ, CANDIDO NANCY TORRES-RODRIGUEZ 9397 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 RODRIGUEZ, LAURA 82 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 RODRIGUEZ, MARY ALICIA CHACIN 8284 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #1314 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 ROESSLE, NICOLE 9373 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 ROETTGER, JOHN K & ANN M 9733 RESTON LANE MC CORDSVILLE, IN 46055---0000 15 48 26 ROGERS, STEPHEN A & ELLYN 9517 LIVORNO CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 ROLLO, RONALD J 9710 HAAF FARM DR PICKERINGTON, OH 43147---8377 27 48 26 ROLLO, RONALD J & MELANIE A 9710 HAAF FARM DR PICKERINGTON, OH 43147---0000 27 48 26 ROLLO, RONALD J & MELANIE A 9710 HAAF FARM DRIVE PICKERINGTON, OH 43147---0000 27 48 26 RONDEAU, MICHAEL & TAMMY 2022 MORNING SUN LN NAPLES, FL 34119---3325 27 48 26 RONDEAU, MICHAEL B & TAMMY D 2022 MORNING SUN LN NAPLES, FL 34119---3325 27 48 26 RONDEAU, MICHAEL B & TAMMY D 2022 MORNING SUN LN NAPLES, FL 34119---3325 27 48 26 ROSABELLA, SANDRA JEAN 8264 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #813 NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 27 48 26 ROSALES, ORLANDO 9018 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 ROSALES, ORLANDO 9425 BENVENUTO COURT #102 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 ROTSKOFF, KENNETH S & JUDITH A 9442 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---2011 22 48 26 ROUHOFF, RICHARD A & LINDA C 431 EAGLE LANE SW ROCHESTER, MN 55902---0000 22 48 26 ROUSE, ANTHONY E & MICHELLE C 9267 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 RRJM JOINT REVOCABLE TRUST 935 CARNOUSTIE WAY OREGON, WI 53575---0000 15 48 26 RUSCH, TOM RICHARD GABERT 1290 OSBORN AVE OSHKOSH, WI 54902---6213 27 48 26 RUSSELL, PETER & SHARON 8656 DILILLO COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 RUSSO, ANTHONY F & PHYLLIS T 8773 BELLANO COURT #102 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 RUSSO, FRANK URSO 305 POCHET LN SCHAUMBURG, IL 60193---1424 27 48 26 RUSSO, FRANK URSO & ROSEMARY 305 POCHET LN ITASCA, IL 60143---0000 27 48 26 RUSSO, JOSEPH J BRITTNEY MARCHETTA 79 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9759 27 48 26 RUTZ, MIROSLAW & IWONA E 8274 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #1026 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 RYLAND, KEITH CHARLES JULIETTE SUSAN RYLAND 9455 GALLIANO TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 S L & J MARJAN JOINT REV TRUST 9034 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 S T & P A BAKER REV TRUST 9360 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SACHS, RONALD E & CHRISTINE Y 380 PRESCOTT LANE GURNEE, IL 60031---0000 22 48 26 SADLER, CHRISTOPHER S DEBORAH H SADLER 9071 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SAITTA, GEORGE A ELLEN T WALL 149 CATHEART RD BOX 641 GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437---0000 22 48 26 SALAZAR, ADOLFO J & EVELYN 9050 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SALINGER, BRUCE C & MAUREEN 187 GUINEA RD BREWSTER, NY 10509---0000 22 48 26 SALINGER, BRUCE C & MAUREEN 187 GUINEA RD BREWSTER, NY 10509---0000 22 48 26 SALISBURY, KEITH T & DENISE M 9426 BENVENUTO COURT #102 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SALLAI, LADISLAV 8288 KEY ROYAL LN APT 1421 NAPLES, FL 34119---6799 27 48 26 SALLY M MANFREDI REV TRUST 22 HUNTERS RUN RYE, NH 03870---0000 22 48 26 SALOKAR, FRANK A & ROSEMARY N 5935 SW 34TH STREET MIAMI, FL 33155---4916 27 48 26 SAMUEL H MILLER FAMILY TRUST 5800 LAMPLIGHTER DR GIRARD, OH 44220---0000 22 48 26 SANCHEZ, ROBERT JOANNA CHON 9022 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SANCHEZ, SEGAL 129 MENTOR DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 27 48 26 SANDERS REVOCABLE TRUST 23 VICTORY LANE CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO 63701---9429 15 48 26 SANDRA L STONER REV TRUST 8840 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SANTOS, JUANITA 8271 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 914 NAPLES, FL 34119---6817 27 48 26 SARA T GAMMON TRUST 9610 COBALT COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 SARAB, AARON B & ALYSSA D 9003 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SARABIA JR, STEPHEN A 8287 KEY ROYAL LN APT 1523 NAPLES, FL 34119---6802 27 48 26 SARAH J SHERMAN REV LIV TRUST 1915 LONG LAKE SHORES BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48307---0000 22 48 26 SARCHIONI, LINDA J 8274 KEY ROYAL CIR #1033 NAPLES, FL 34119---6812 27 48 26 SARTORELLI, SANDRA 100 YORK STREET UNIT 15-P NEW HAVEN, CT 06511---0000 15 48 26 SAUNDRY # 1000 LAND TRUST 275 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 11 48 26 SAVIOTTI, EDUARDO MARY S PEREZ 63 STARVIEW DR TORONTO, ON CANADA M9M LK7 27 48 26 SCARDIGLI, DENNIS & THERESA 8912 SAVONA COURT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 SCAVUZZO, JOHN F & NANCY A 9471 GALLIANO TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SCHAEFER ET AL, HENRY 1051 SW 156TH AVE PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33027---2235 27 48 26 SCHEINHOLZ, ARTHUR & IVY 9678 MONTELANICO LOOP UNIT 101 BLDG 14 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SCHILGEN, JOHN R HELEN MICHELLE SCHILGEN 8765 BELLANO COURT UNIT 102 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SCHLAGER, NORMA 134 LOGGING TRAIL RD DANBURY, CT 06811---0000 22 48 26 SCHMID, ROBERT & LAURA A 8765 BELLANO COURT UNIT 101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SCHMIDT, DENNIS C & DIANA L 9062 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SCHOBACK REVOCABLE TRUST 9701 COBALT COVE CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 23 48 26 SCHOCK, CLYDE JOHN MARY CLAIRE SCHOCK 8872 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---9533 22 48 26 SCHOLL LIVING TRUST 12254 WOODMONT DR COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80921---0000 22 48 26 SCHULMAN, GALE L 9685 MONTELANICO LOOP #103 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SCHWARTZ, BRUCE R & KATHY D 8768 BELLANO CT #102 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SCIMIO, MARK A & LORI L 8870 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---9575 22 48 26 SCOTT, RUSSELL & CYNTHIA 121 COTTONWOOD ROAD NORTHBROOK, IL 60062---0000 22 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 14 of 21 SD ESPLANADE LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SD ESPLANADE LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SD ESPLANADE LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SD ESPLANADE LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SD ESPLANADE LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SD ESPLANADE LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SD ESPLANADE LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SD ESPLANADE LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SD ESPLANADE LLC 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SEGUIN, DANIEL F 25 RUE DES OUTAOUAIS GATINEAU, QC CANADA J8T 6L2 27 48 26 SEGUIN, DANIEL F 25 RUE DES OUTAOUAIS GATINEAU, QC CANADA J8T 6L2 27 48 26 SENICOLA, ANITA 8405 HOLLOW BROOK CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---9724 27 48 26 SENKARIK, ROBERT P & DONNA D 9030 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SETTEMBRINO, FRANK & CRYSTAL 8739 CAVANO ST EAST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SHARP, KENNETH DARRELL SUSAN PATRICIA SHARP 9155 TRIVOLE TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SHARPE, MARK & KATHLEEN 9468 LIVORNO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SHEFFIELD, JOHN STEVEN LORRAINE SHEFFIELD 9078 SORRENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SHERIDAN, MICHAEL & DAISY 10103 CHESTERTON RD JACKSONVILLE, FL 32246---0000 27 48 26 SHOKLER FAMILY TRUST 9030 SORENO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SHOURIE, SATISH K & YANIZA B 9715 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4661 23 48 26 SHOVER, JENNIFER A JOEL T SHOVER 95 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9759 27 48 26 SHULTZ, ANNE 8271 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 911 NAPLES, FL 34119---6817 27 48 26 SIBOL, THOMAS P 1233 COPPER BEECH DR YORK, PA 17403---0000 22 48 26 SIMMONS, CHARLES & DANNA 2755 46TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34116---7853 11 48 26 SIMONE, ANTHONY G & KELLEY A 9361 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SIMONSEN, DELLA 96097 STONEY CREEK PARKWAY FERNANDINA BCH, FL 32034---0000 27 48 26 SIMPSON FAMILY LIVING TRUST 8776 BELLANO CT #204 NAPLES, FL 34119---9698 22 48 26 SLAVIK, JOHN R 8677 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SMITH FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 8633 AMOUR COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SMITH, ERIC JILL SMITH 8205 ROYAL SCARLET DR BALDWINSVILLE, NY 13027---0000 27 48 26 SMITH, JEFFREY J & HEATHER W 9283 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SMITH, LEONARD C & RHONDA K 8776 BELLANO CT UNIT 101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SMITH, STACY 8244 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #613 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 SMYSER, JOHN M & AMY 8847 NAUTICAL LANDING CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 15 48 26 SNAVELY, JOHN LWRENCE MARY ANNE SNAVELY 9010 ARREZO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SOBOL, JODY 105 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9751 27 48 26 SOSNIK, HOWARD & TRACEY G 8848 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 SOULIA RODRIGUE REV TRUST 9464 GALLIANO TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SPAGNUOLO, PIETRO & KERRI 8710 IBIS COVE CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 SPAHLINGER, WAYNE G 293 MENTOR DR NAPLES, FL 34110---1354 22 48 26 SPAIDE, MICHELLE L 9420 BENVENUTO COURT #202 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 SPERANZA, VINCENT M 1585 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 27 48 26 SPINA, ALFRED & LILLIAN 8214 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 111 NAPLES, FL 34119---6796 27 48 26 SPRINGER, DIANE H & WILLIAM C 9493 LIVORNO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SRIRAMAN, ROM 8660 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SRIRAMAN, ROM & LAKSHMI 8660 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SSSG LLC 24381 WOODSAGE DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0000 15 48 26 STACKPOLE, MICHAEL J & LYNN A 240 GRAND BLVD MASSAPEQUA, NY 11762---0000 15 48 26 STAFFORD, GRACE 736 96TH AVE N NAPLES, FL 34108---2476 22 48 26 STALEY, EDMUND J & CAROL A 8854 VACCARO COURT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 STALL, JEFFERSON A & PAMELA A 9410 GALLIANO TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 STAMP-FORD LAND TRUST 8899 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 STANSFIELD REVOCBLE TRUST 9242 RIALTO LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 STEDMAN, DAVID 74 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9757 27 48 26 STEELE, WILLIAM T LISA C REXROAT STEELE 1644 CANOPY CHASE BROOKHAVEN, GA 30319---0000 22 48 26 STEFFEN, CENNERT & VARPU 8661 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 STEINHAUSER, SHANNON L 8287 KEY ROYAL LN APT 1513 NAPLES, FL 34119---6802 27 48 26 STEPHEN, ROBERT S & JOLEEN S 109 HIGHVIEW TERRACE MANCHESTER, NH 03104---0000 27 48 26 STEPHEN, ROBERT S & JOLEEN S 109 HIGHVIEW TERRACE MANCHESTER, NH 03104---0000 27 48 26 STEPHENS, KENNETH P JACQUELYN STEPHENS 8274 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 1034 NAPLES, FL 34119---6812 27 48 26 STEVEN J LEIBACH LIVING TRUST 9168 TRIVOLI TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 STG SOUTH LLC 7791 YELLOWWOOD DRIVE MASON, OH 45040---0000 22 48 26 STOWELL, COLLIN RACHEL WEHNER 8288 KEY ROYAL LANE #1436 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 STRAUSS, WILLIAM A 9 CHARLES LN RYEBROOK, NY 10573---0000 22 48 26 STURINO, MARIO & JOANNE 3 MCLEOD COURT CALEDON EAST, ON CANADA L7C 1H7 22 48 26 SUAREZ, AGNES M 103 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9751 27 48 26 SULLIVAN, EDWARD L & SUSAN G 9041 SORRENO COURT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 SULLIVAN, JAMES D & KATHLEEN S 8756 BELLANO COURT #102 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SUNAV LAKE LLC 98 SOUTH ARCH BAY DR ANN ARBOR, MI 48108---0000 22 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 15 of 21 SUNAV LAKE LLC 98 SOUTH ARCH BAY DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48108---0000 22 48 26 SURDYKE, JENNIFER MARIE JOSHUA JOSEPH HUELSING 8760 BELLANO CT #202 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SUSAN L WUDEL LIVING TRUST 9770 NICKEL RIDGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 23 48 26 SWEENEY, JOHN & DEIRDRE 8773 BELLANO CT UNIT 101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 SWEET, TERRY LYNN & JUDY LEE DARLENE LOFGREN 1221 GULF SHORE BLVD N #501 NAPLES, FL 34102---0000 15 48 26 T B PANACCION JR REV TRUST ANITA M PANACCION REV TRUST 9287 RIALTO LN NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMAN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA FL, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34223---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 16 of 21 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 11 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 11 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 17 of 21 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 18 of 21 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 19 of 21 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SAROSATA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 SAROSATA, FL 34232---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC 551N CATTLEMAN RD #200 SARASOTA, FL 34232---0000 22 48 26 TAYLOR, CARL & GEORGINA 9117 ESPLANADE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 TAYLOR, JAMES M & CAROL A 8683 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 TBC ADDIE'S COMMERCIAL LLC ATTN: WILLIAM B YEOMANS JR 13920 58TH STREET N STE 1014 22 48 26 TBC TREE FARM 1 LLC % THE BROOKLINE COMPANIES LLC ATTN: WILLIAM B YEOMANS 14004 ROOSEVELT BLVD #601C CLEARWATER, FL 33762---0000 22 48 26 TBC TREE FARM 2 LLC % BROOKLINE COMPANIES LLC ATTN: JAMES T MURPHY 14004 ROOSEVELT BLVD STE 601C CLEARWATER, FL 33762---0000 22 48 26 TBC TREE FARM 2 LLC % THE BROOKLINE COMPANIES LLC ATTN: JAMES T MURPHY 14004 ROOSEVELT BLVD STE 601C CLEARWATER, FL 33762---0000 22 48 26 TEDESCHI, JOHN F 9457 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 TEDESCHI, RAYMOND T JILL M MOORE-TEDESCHI 34 SILVER BROOK LN NORWELL, MA 02061---0000 15 48 26 TERESA WORKLAN LIVING TRUST PO BOX 112 LAKE VILLA, IL 60046---0112 27 48 26 TESSIERO, BART A & DEBORAH L PO BOX 216 HAGAMAN, NY 12086---0000 27 48 26 THEURKAUF, PATRICIA A 8895 SAVONA COURT NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 THIGPEN, MICHAEL & ANN MARIE MARK=& BROOKE THIGPEN 2091 OAKWOOD ST GIRARD, OH 44420---1158 27 48 26 THIMMARAYAPPA, MAHESHA JESSICA BARTALINO 27677 ARABIAN DRIVE SALISBURY, MD 21801---0000 15 48 26 THOMAN, DENISE 8271 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #932 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 THOMAS E EBERT A/R TRUST 8761 BELLANO CT #204 NAPLES, FL 34119---9690 22 48 26 THOMAS JAY KELL LIV TRUST MARY ELLEN KELL LIV TRUST 8211MOUNT OLIVE CRESCENT NIAGARA FALLS, ON CANADA L2H 2Y9 22 48 26 THOMAS R BRANDT TRUST 8627 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 THOMAS, BERNADETTE SAM SIVARTSEN 8697 DILILLO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 THOMPSON, KEVIN & JANICE 5429 FIRST LINE ACTON, ON CANADA L7J 2L9 22 48 26 TIEFENBACH, JEFFREY P ALICE RENEE TIEFENBACH 8619 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 TOBEY, FRANCIS J & DEBORAH L 730 INDIAN CREEK CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0425 27 48 26 TODDY, JOSEPH MICHAEL STEPHANIE FRANCINE TODDY 37 L'ENFANT COURT GLEN MILLS, PA 19342---0000 15 48 26 TOMASELLI, PAUL & BARBARA 9563 COQUINA CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 TOMKO, SANDRA C 8254 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 712 NAPLES, FL 34119---6808 27 48 26 TONY B HAYES TRUST 8806 VACCARO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 TOOMBS, LATEEYA D 8275 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE UNIT 1124 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 TOOMEY JR, JOSEPH F 28 OCEAN AVE QUINCY, MA 02171---0000 27 48 26 TORRISI, GAETANO P MARIANNE F TORRISI 8777 BELLANO COURT UNIT 101 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 TRECROCI FAMILY LTD 3523 99TH ST PLEASANT PRAIRIE, WI 53158---0000 22 48 26 TREMBLAY, RYAN DANIEL 8298 KEY ROYAL LN APT 422 NAPLES, FL 34119---6800 27 48 26 TRIANA FAMILY REV TRUST 4150 SW 112TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33165---4774 27 48 26 TRICE, BARRY G 76 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9757 27 48 26 TROIANO, CHARLES D & ANNETTE 9402 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 TURNEY, DIANE V 8760 BELLANO CT #102 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 UMEH, LEONARD 67 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 27 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 20 of 21 UNGOLO, VITO & ANNA MARIA 1324 GREENWOOD CRESCENT OAKVILLE, ON CANADA L6J 6V7 27 48 26 UV CITE LLC 1125 NE 25TH ST # 101 NORTH MIAMI, FL 33161---0000 27 48 26 VAINISI, JANINE A & WILLIAM A 636 BALMORAL LN 551 N CATTLEMEN RD #200 INVERNESS, IL 60067---0000 22 48 26 VALDES, ARLENYS VERDECIA 8224 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #223 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 VALENTA EST, AUGUST J % JEANINE VALENTA PR KATHLEEN A VALENTA 591 WHISPERING PINE LN NAPLES, FL 34103---2425 11 48 26 VALENZUELA, RONNY LYNETTE VALENZUELA 8844 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 VALSANTE TRUST 1220 73RD ST BROOKLYN, NY 11228---2015 27 48 26 VAN WYK, PETER C AMY KIEDINGER VAN WYK 7549 GARIBALDI CT NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 22 48 26 VANDERLAAN, LORI A & PETER J 2821 MAJESTIC OAKS LANE SAINT CHARLES, IL 60174---0000 22 48 26 VATTER, VERNON A 87 POWELL AVE SOUTH HAMPTON, NY 11968---0000 22 48 26 VAUGHAN, KEVIN S & MICHELLA B 8673 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 VEDUCCIO, KENNETH J LEONA A CRESEY 9122 TRIVOLI TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 VELLETRI, NANCY L 29 PARKWAY AVE CRANSTON, RI 02905---3311 27 48 26 VENESS, WAYNE R & JACQUELINE L 9456 LIVORNO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 VENTOLA, ROBERT H & ANGELA M 225 DERBY STREET #604 SALEM, MA 01970---5163 27 48 26 VERNON JR, NORMAN P 9704 COBALT COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4666 23 48 26 VERRICO, LAWRENCE BARRY 8214 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 133 NAPLES, FL 34119---6796 27 48 26 VETRANO, ROBERT B KAREN RUSINAK-VETRANO 8904 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 VIGLIOTTI TR, DOMENIC J 9692 COBALT COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4664 23 48 26 VIGLIOTTI, LOUIS J & DENISE M 1413 TURNBERRY WAY BEL AIR, MD 21015---0000 15 48 26 VIVACQUA, ANTHONY J CARMEL C VIVACQUA 101 SPRING GARDEN DRIVE YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512---0000 27 48 26 VIVACQUA, ANTHONY J & CARMEL C 101 SPRING GARDEN DR YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512---0000 27 48 26 VIVACQUA, ANTHONY J & CARMEL C 101 SPRING GARDEN DRIVE YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512---0000 27 48 26 VOGEL, JOHN & JOAN 9223 RIALTO LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 W P & C K WISE REV FMLY TRUST 9470 GALLIANO TERRACE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 WAGNER FLORIDA TRUST 3465 GRACY RD MCHENRY, IL 60050---0000 22 48 26 WAGSCHAL, INGO & SYLVIA 9460 LIVORNO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 WALDRON, ANN & JAMES 129 KNEEN ST SHELTON, CT 06484---3900 27 48 26 WALDRON, KEVIN M & HARRIETTE O 410 BOXWOOD RD BRYN MAWR, PA 19010---0000 15 48 26 WARREN, TERRY T 9464 LIVORNO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 WARZALA, RICHARD L 1231 PLEASANT VALLEY WARREN, OH 44483---0000 27 48 26 WASINSKI, STANISLAW MIROSLAWA WASINSKI 74 GRASMERE CRESC LONDON, ON CANADA N6G 4P2 27 48 26 WATSON, MICHAEL A NANCY L BLUME-WATSON 9465 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 WEBER, FREDERICK W CATHERINE A WEBER 34 AMARON LANE STATEN ISLAND, NY 10307---0000 22 48 26 WEISGAL, JAMES & NELLY 8763 CAVANO ST E NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 WELSH, JAMES & JEAN M 8648 AMOUR COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 WENDY K MANLEY REV TRUST 9312 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 WETMORE, EDWARD C & LYNN D 4 SHELTON TER TRUMBULL, CT 06611---0000 22 48 26 WHITLOCK FAMILY REV TRUST 6927 W GREYHAWK CT FRANKLIN, WI 53132---0000 22 48 26 WIECHERING, ROBERT W VIRGINIA M SIMONE 8614 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 22 48 26 WIERZBICKI, TONASZ & MARIA M 12 WILSON ST WINCHESTER, MA 01890---0000 22 48 26 WILLIAM D WILMS DEC OF TRUST SUSAN A WILMS DEC OF TRUST 215 WALNUT ST LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048---1339 27 48 26 WILLIAM G MACH REV LIV TRUST VICKI D MACH REV LIV TRUST 9481 LIVORNO CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 WILLIAMS, DAVID R & ANNA M 9493 GALLIANO TER NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 WILLIAMS, MARK A DONNA M DELVECCHIO 454 COPELAN CT OAKVILLE, ON CANADA L6J 4 22 48 26 WILSON, JAMES & MARY L 2102 IMPERIAL CIR NAPLES, FL 34110---1037 27 48 26 WILSON, RODNEY LOWELL 8294 KEY ROYAL CIRCLE #1635 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 WILSON, THOMAS E & THERESE J 866 STILLWELL COURT WHEATON, IL 60189---0000 22 48 26 WINANS, ANTHONY W 8254 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 732 NAPLES, FL 34119---6808 27 48 26 WINTERS, MARTINN E KRISTIN M HOWLETT 8695 AMOUR CT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 WISNIESKI, CHARLES & MARIE 9555 COQUINA CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 14 48 26 WITTMAN, MATTHEW 260 ROSE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---9703 22 48 26 WOLF, KARL H & TANA L 9278 RIALTO LANE NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 WONG, PHILIP SHERRY WONG CHEN 9419 BENVENUTO COURT #201 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 15 48 26 WOOD III, NEWTON O & KAREN M 8832 SAVONA COURT NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 WOOD, THOMAS FRANCIS & DONNA M 8828 SAVONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119---9533 22 48 26 WOODHOUSE, LORRAINE D WAITER 4001 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES, FL 34104---0000 22 48 26 WOODSON, JENNIFER A 8244 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 626 NAPLES, FL 34119---6807 27 48 26 WRIGHT, JOANNE & WALTER S 106 HARBOUR VIEW DR MASSAPEQUA, NY 11758---0000 15 48 26 WYCISZKIEWICZ, ADAM ALICJA BUTKIEWICZ 1247 E 70TH ST APT 2 BROOKLYN, NY 11234---5727 27 48 26 WYCISZKIEWICZ, ADAM ALICJA BUTKIEWICZ 1247 E 70TH STREET #2 BROOKLYN, NY 11234---0000 27 48 26 WYMAN, JEFFREY & ELIZABETH A 712 WOODHAVEN LN NAPLES, FL 34108---8520 27 48 26 XHIALLI, ANDREA & IRENA 87 BURNT PINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9759 27 48 26 XIA, LUNXI PETER LEA LI ZHANG 8615 CAVANO ST NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 YARUSSI, ANTHONY T & MICHELE A 68 HEMLOCK DRIVE GRAND ISLAND, NY 14072---0000 22 48 26 YEDRA JR, VICTOR 8287 KEY ROYAL LN #1524 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 27 48 26 YUE, LONGMEI 9337 TERRESINA DR NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 22 48 26 YUREWITCH, MARGARET STEPHEN PAUL KENNEDY 711 THIRD STREET SW NAPLES, FL 34117---5113 27 48 26 ZABALETA ET AL, NICOLAS 8294 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 1624 NAPLES, FL 34119---6803 27 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PL20180002020 500' 11/13/2018 21 of 21 ZARAMA, ANDREW ALEXANDRA ZARAMA 25 CEDARHILL DR OTTAWA, ON CANADA K2R 1C5 14 48 26 ZASA, VINCENT 8274 KEY ROYAL CIR APT 1023 NAPLES, FL 34119---6812 27 48 26 ZEGLIS, DAVID & CINDY 1240 S POPLAR AVE KANKAKEE, IL 60901---0000 22 48 26 ZHAO, QIAN 9426 BENVENUTO CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34119---2027 15 48 26 ZIELINSKI, ROBERT E ANNE MARIE ZIELINSKI 21 CHURCHILL SQUARE SCHENECTADY, NY 12309---0000 15 48 26 ZIRNHELD, JEROME P & KIMIKO 9217 RIALTO LANE NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 15 48 26 POList_500_PL20180002020 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 190Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 191Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 192Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 193Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 194Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT ESPLANADE RPUD HATCHER PARCEL ADDITION SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34104 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 1 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 WETLAND JURISDICTION AND PERMITTING HISTORY OVERVIEW ........................... 4 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS (PRE-DEVELOPMENT).................................................................. 5 3.1 VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS ................................................................................................. 5 3.2 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS ......................................................................... 7 3.3 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS ............................................................................. 7 3.4 NATIVE HABITAT .......................................................................................................................... 8 3.5 LISTED PLANT & ANIMAL SPECIES ....................................................................................... 10 3.6 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................................ 10 3.7 SOILS ............................................................................................................................................... 11 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS (POST-DEVELOPMENT) .......................................................... 15 4.1 PROPOSED PROJECT ................................................................................................................. 15 4.2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS ...................................................................................... 15 4.3 PRESERVATION OF WETLANDS, OTHER SURFACE WATERS, AND UPLANDS ...... 16 4.4 PROJECT IMPACTS TO LISTED SPECIES .............................................................................. 16 4.5 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL RESOURCES .................. 19 4.6 PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................................................ 19 5.0 PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH CCME ................................................................................. 20 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Hatcher Parcels property is approximately 10 acres located in north east Collier County, about ¼ mile north of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and west of Plateau Road (Collier Blvd extension). The property is located within Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The project site is made up of two approximately 5-acre parcels individually identified as folio numbers 00190040200 and 00187520005 by the Collier County property appraiser’s office. Access to the project site is via Broken Back Road from the Collier Blvd extension. A general location map is provided in the included exhibits. The applicant is proposing to add the Hatcher parcels to the existing Esplanade Golf & Country Club RPUD (Esplanade RPUD), previously known as Mirasol PUD (Exhibit 8- Esplanade PUD Additional Lands Map). All of the 10.01 acres would be designated Residential/ Golf with the access coming from the existing Esplanade lands to the north. The majority of the site has been infested to a large degree by melaleuca with Brazilian pepper and earleaf acacia present as well. HATCHER PARCELS Of the 10.01 acres, approximately 5.80 acres meet the County definition of native habitat. The Esplanade PUD requires 60% of the native vegetation to be preserved onsite due to the density blending criteria established during the original PUD approval. This equates to 3.48 acres more preserve within the PUD to account for these parcels. All of the required 3.48 acres will be provided within the overall Esplanade PUD preserve lands. Surrounding land use includes single and multi-family residential and golf course, plant nursery, and a fallow tree nursery slated for commercial and residential development. ESPLANADE PUD An amendment to Esplanade’s PUD would change the existing total acreage from 1,658.21± acres to 1,668.22± acres, of which 455.43 acres are Urban and 1,212.79 acres are RFMU neutral lands within the proposed PUD boundary. Of the 1,658.21 acres, approximately 903.85 acres met the County definition of native habitat and the addition of the Hatcher Parcels will increase the native habitat total to 909.65 acres (Exhibit 9- Collier County Native Habitat Requirements). Collier County’s Growth Management Plan requires Esplanade to retain 60% of the vegetation onsite that meets the definition of Native, according to the Land 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 3 Development Code. For the proposed PUD Amendment, there will be a minimum of 545.79 native acres required to be preserved. The existing Esplanade property provides for 965.66 acres of which approximately 791.7 acres currently meet the County criteria as native habitat. There are also 11.8 acres are converted to woodstork foraging habitat improvements which have not been included in the 791.7 acres. This document provides information concerning the proposed addition of the Hatcher parcels to the Esplanade PUD as it relates to natural resources and environmental issues. It was compiled by Tim Hall, senior ecologist and vice-president of Turrell, Hall and Associates. It was written to support an application submitted to Collier County for an amendment to the existing RPUD zoning designation. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 4 2.0 WETLAND JURISDICTION AND PERMITTING HISTORY OVERVIEW In 1983, a Collier County building permit was issued for the residential structure on the southern 5 acre parcel. The residence was constructed in 1983. A Collier County building permit was issued in 1990 for the residential structure on the northern 5 acre parcel. The main residence was constructed in 1990 and has been added to or modified in 1994 and 2000. Clearing around the residences is consistent with County code at the time they were constructed. No USACE or FDEP Environmental Resource Permits were found. The plan will impact approximately 2.12 acres of State jurisdictional wetlands. Mitigation for these impacts will be required but isolated nature and lack of good hydrology will depress the value. For the purpose of this report it is assumed that the wetlands will also fall under federal jurisdiction and require USACE permitting. There is a chance that the wetlands may be considered isolated due to surrounding development construction and therefore no longer under federal jurisdiction. If the Corps does not assert jurisdiction, then permitting will be with SFWMD only and coordination with FWS on listed species issues will be done through their technical assistance process. If the USACE does claim jurisdiction over the wetlands, then the mitigation provided for the SFWMD will also serve for the USACE. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 5 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS (PRE-DEVELOPMENT) 3 .1 VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS 3.1.1 Project Site The project site is comprised of two parcels, both of which have existing single family residences constructed on them. The south residence was built in 1983 while the north parcel was built in 1990. For this report, vegetative communities and other land uses are combined between the two parcels. Vegetative communities include mesic and hydric Pine flatwoods as well as some oak hammock. Mesic pine and oak areas are upland community types while the hydric pine still retains wetland characteristics. The existing habitat types (based on FLUCFCS codes) are shown in Table 1 below and Exhibit 2 (FLUCFCS Map). Of the total 10.01 acres contained within the combined Hatcher Parcel property boundary, approximately 78% are considered uplands (7.82 ac.) and 22% are considered wetlands (2.12 ac. of wetlands and 0.07 ac. of OSW). Several portions of the property have been infested to some degree by noxious exotic vegetation; including melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. Table 1- EXISTING HABITAT TYPES - FLUCFCS Codes & Acreages Wetland Habitat FLUCCS Code Project Acreage Hydric Pine (50-75% exotics) 625 (E3) 2.12 Total Wetland Habitat 2.12 OSW Habitat (Ponds)** 524 0.07 Total OSW Habitat 0.36 Upland Habitat Residential Low Density** 111 1.40 Ornamental Nursery** 243 1.59 Pine Flatwood (25-50% exotics) 411 (E2) 1.71 Live Oak (50-75% exotics) 427 (E3) 1.97 Disturbed Land (roads and berms) 740 1.15 Total Upland Habitat 7.82 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 6 ** Habitats do not qualify as native habitat under Collier County guidelines as long as it can be demonstrated that they were legally cleared. There are no rare or exceptional vegetation associations present on the project lands. Vegetative communities in Florida designated as Pine Flatwoods typically occur in such a way that either slash pine or longleaf pine dominate the canopy while saw palmetto and other herbaceous plants make up the majority of the understory. This site is situated in south Florida, which means that slash pine is the dominant canopy. The site is overgrown with exotics and vines, with a very limited saw palmetto understory. A list of commonly observed plant species within this community can be found below in Table 2. Table 2: Commonly observed species found within the Pine Flatwoods Community Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Dominant Slash pine Pinus elliottii C, M Yes Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C, M Yes Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C Yes Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto M No Saw palmetto Serenoa repens G No Myrsine Myrsine cubana G No Greenbriar Smilax spp. V No Muscadine Vitis rotundifolia V No C = canopy stratum, M = midstory stratum, G = ground stratum, V = woody vine stratum Vegetative communities in Florida designated as Hydric Pine Flatwood are generally similar to the mesic pine community but with more herbaceous groundcover and no saw palmetto. It is often a transitional area between deeper wetland and upland communities. A list of commonly observed plant species within this community can be found below in Table 3. Table 3: Commonly observed species found within the Hydric Pine Community Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Dominant Slash pine Pinus elliottii C, M, G Yes Cypress Taxodium distichum C No Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C, M Yes Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M No Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C Yes Primrose willow Ludwigia peruviana M No Myrsine Myrsine cubana G No Coco plum Chysobalanus icaco G No Swamp fern Telmatoblechnum serrulatum G No Poison Ivy Toxicodendron radicans V No C = canopy stratum, M = midstory stratum, G = ground stratum, V = woody vine stratum 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 7 Vegetative communities designated as Oak Hammock are dominated by laurel and/or live oak and can have open or closed midstory. A list of commonly observed plant species within this community can be found below in Table 4. Table 4: Commonly observed species found within the Hydric Pine Community Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Dominant Live Oak Quercus virginiana C, M Yes Slash pine Pinus elliottii C, M, G Yes Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C, M Yes Java Plum Syzygium cumini C, M No Earleaf Acacia Acacia auriculiformis C, M No Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C Yes Myrsine Myrsine cubana G No Coco plum Chysobalanus icaco G No Swamp fern Telmatoblechnum serrulatum G No Muscadine Vitis rotundifolia V No Greenbriar Smilax spp V No Poison Ivy Toxicodendron radicans V No 3 .2 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS According to the SFWMD, the project lands as well as surrounding off-site lands are located within the Cocohatchee drainage basin. The basin boundary (divide) to the south generally follows Immokalee Road (SR 846) east and west. The basin divide to the north generally follows the County Boundary east and west all the way to Wiggins Pass on the coast. Historically, prior to extensive human development of the area, water generally flowed from northeast to southwest driven by the land elevations dropping toward the Gulf of Mexico. Water generally flows in this same direction through the remaining flow-ways to the Cocohatchee Canal and Cocohatchee River. 3 .3 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS Qualified Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) environmental staff inspected the project site for the purpose of delineating wetlands and other surface waters. The wetland delineation methodologies and criteria set forth by the state (in Chapter 62-340, FAC, Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters) and the Corps (in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual) were followed in determining whether an area was considered as a wetland or other surface water and in delineating the limits (boundaries) of potential jurisdictional wetlands and other surface waters. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 8 THA biologists flagged the boundaries of those areas which are considered wetlands according to the state and federal guidelines. There were very few cases where it appeared wetland lines established based on the state methodology would differ from those established based on the federal (Corps) methodology. Where this did occur, the feature boundary was flagged based on the landward-most extent of the two methods – in other words, the methodology that produced the greatest extent of wetlands was used to flag the wetland line. Sheet 03 of the enclosed exhibits depicts wetlands present on the project lands. Within the Hatcher Parcel property there is a single distinct wetland area that is not connected to off-site wetlands due to adjacent berms. 3.3.1 Wetland Seasonal High Water Table & Hydroperiod The hydrologic regime on this property is extremely altered from historical levels and patterns by surrounding development. Seasonal high-water elevations were determined using water lines, lichen lines, adventitious rooting, and other hydrologic indicators. Nails were placed in several trees at the seasonal high- water level indicators and will be later surveyed to determine elevations and help establish final control elevations for the development. Water from adjacent properties is now mostly cut off as a result of construction (residences and roads) around the site. There is standing water in the pond year-round, however the remainder of the site dries out seasonally before being inundated again during rainy season. 3.3.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands The on-site wetlands are SFWMD jurisdictional but may not be jurisdictional to the USACE due to the isolation from other wetlands or open waters. 3.3.3 Jurisdictional Status of Other Surface Waters The other surface waters present on the property is a man-made fill pit pond excavated around 1983 for fill that was used on the residential construction. Due to the lack of connectivity with the wetlands and no surficial hydrologic connections to downstream navigable waters of the U.S. (tidal waters), these OSWs were assumed to not be jurisdictional with either the SFWMD or the Corps. 3.4 NATIVE HABITAT Collier County Land Development Code regulations require that projects preserve a portion of their on-site native habitat as part of their development proposal. Calculations are based on a percentage of the acreage of native habitat existing on the 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 9 site. Lands within the County ROW are not included in this calculation. Since Esplanade RPUD property is greater than 20 acres in size and straddles the Urban and Rural Fringe boundary, it is required to preserve 60% of the native vegetation on the site. Taking into account the original approvals and later addition of the Dillilo Parcel, the project had 903.85 acres of habitat that met the County definition of native habitat. The addition of the Hatcher Parcels will add 5.8 acres to the “pre-development” native habitat totals resulting in native habitat acreage of 909.65 acres upon which the preserve requirement has to be determined. Per the PUD approval, 60% of the 909.65 acres must be preserved resulting in a 545.79 acre preserve requirement. The Esplanade RPUD has approximately 965.66 acres of preserve within the PUD boundary as well as an additional contiguous 160 acres outside of the PUD boundary. The preserve are still undergoing enhancement and restoration activities but approximately 791.7 acres of the 965.66 acres would meet the native habitat criteria of the County. This is more than sufficient to meet the preserve requirements associated with the addition of the Hatcher Parcels. Table 5- Native Vegetation Acreages Habitat FLUCCS Code Total Acreage Native Vegetation Acreage Residential Low Density** 111 1.40 0.00 Ornamental Nursery** 243 1.59 0.00 Pine Flatwood (25-50% exotics) 411 (E2) 1.71 1.71 Live Oak (50-75% exotics) 427 (E3) 1.97 1.97 OSW Habitat (Ponds)** 524 0.07 0.00 Hydric Pine (50-75% exotics) 625 (E3) 2.12 2.12 Disturbed Land (roads and berms) 740 1.15 0.00 Native Vegetation Acreage 5.80 Prior PUD Native Vegetation Acreage 903.85 New Total Native Vegetation Acreage 909.65 New PUD Native Vegetation Requirement (0.60 * 909.65) 545.79 Existing Onsite Preservation 965.66** ** Approximately 791.7 acres of the preserve currently meet the County native habitat criteria. The remainder is still undergoing enhancement and restoration work. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 10 3.5 LISTED PLANT & ANIMAL SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species has been conducted within the project area by THA biologists. This threatened and endangered species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Appendix B. During the survey events, no listed species were observed within the project area. A few listed animal species not observed on the project lands have some potential for occurring in certain habitats present on project lands. These species are discussed in Appendix B and include; indigo snake, roseate spoonbill, limpkin, southeastern American kestrel, Big Cypress fox squirrel, Florida bonneted bat, and Florida black bear. The probability of these animals utilizing suitable habitats in project lands ranges from very low to moderate depending upon the particular species (see discussion in Appendix B). It is improbable that any of these species currently reside or nest on the project lands. These listed species records and the source of these records are also discussed in Appendix B. It is highly unlikely that any federally listed plant species could be present on the project lands. Due to isolation, exotic species encroachment, proximity to major roadways, and degradation of foraging habitat, it is apparent that this site offers only minimal value to local wildlife. The surrounding developments, and roads have partially isolated this property and made travel to it by larger terrestrial wildlife difficult. 3 .6 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted over the years for the Esplanade (Mirasol and Dilillo addition), and another site (Addie’s Corner) in Section 22 that lies to the south of these parcels. The MSF response depicted a known site several miles to the north, but no recorded archaeological sites on either the subject or surrounding properties. Site investigations were done on the Dilillo and Addie’s Corner properties of a small target area located between those two sites. No evidence of a historic site was found but the area was still protected as preserve within those two projects. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 11 3 .7 SOILS Based on the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) "Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida" (NRCS, 1998) there are two (2) different soil types (soil map units) present on the project lands. Exhibit 07 provides a soils map for the project area as derived from the NRCS mapping. The following sub-sections provide a brief description of each soil map unit identified on the project lands. Information is provided about the soil's landscape position (i.e. it’s typical location in the landscape on a county-wide basis), the soil's profile (i.e. textural composition and thickness or depth range of the layers or horizons commonly present in the soil), and the soil's drainage and hydrologic characteristics. The soils occurring on project lands are as follows: (14) Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum This nearly level poorly drained soil is in sloughs and poorly defined drainageways. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 20 to 300 acres. The slope is 0 to 2 %. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown fine sand about 4 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light brownish gray fine sand to a depth of about 12 inches. The subsoil is to a depth of about 55 inches; the upper part is brownish yellow and very pale brown fine sand, the middle part is grayish brown sandy clay loam, and the lower part is light brownish gray and dark grayish brown fine sandy loam. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 55 inches. In 95 percent of areas mapped as this soil, Pineda and similar soil make up 79 to 100 percent of the map unit. The characteristics of Holopaw and Riviera, limestone substratum soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in this unit are small areas of Boca, Hallandale and Malabar soils on similar landscape positions. These soils make up about 11 percent or less of the unit. The permeability of this soil is slow. The available water capacity is low. In most years, under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is within 12 inches of the surface for 3 to 6 months. In other months, the water table is below 12 inches and recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. During periods of high rainfall, the soil is covered by shallow slowly moving water for periods of about 7 to 30 days. Natural vegetation consists of South Florida slash pine, wax myrtle, chalky bluestem, blue maidencane and gulf muhly. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 12 This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops because of wetness and droughtiness. With good water-control measures and soil-improving measures, the soil can be made suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water control system is needed to remove excess water in wet seasons and provide water through subsurface irrigation in dry season. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparations should include bedding of the rows. Fertilizer and lime should be added according to the need of the crops. With proper water control, the soil is moderately suited to citrus. Water control systems that maintain good drainage to an effective depth are needed. Bedding the soil prior to planting provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high water table. A good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are younger. With good water control management, this soil is well suited to pasture. A water control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. It is well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass and clover. Excellent pastures of grass or grass-clover mixtures can be grown with good management. Regular applications of fertilizers and controlled grazing are needed for highest yields. This soil is well suited for desirable range plant production. The dominant forage consists of blue maidencane, chalky bluestem and bluejoint panicum. Management practices should include deferred grazing. This Pineda soil is in the slough range site. This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses because of the high water table. To overcome this limitation, building sites and septic tank absorption fields should be mounded. This soil also has severe limitations for recreational development because of wetness and sandy textures. Problems associated with wetness can be corrected by providing adequate drainage and drainage outlets to control the high water table. The sandy texture limitation can be overcome by adding suitable topsoil or by resurfacing the area. This Pineda soil is in capability subclass IIIw. (21) Boca Fine Sand This nearly level, poorly drained soil is on the flatwoods. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 20 to 350 acres. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is very dark gray fine sand about 4 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 26 inches; the upper part is light gray 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 13 and the lower part is brown. The subsoil is dark grayish brown fine sandy loam to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. In 95 percent of areas mapped as this soil, Boca and similar soils make up 79 to 93 percent of the map unit. The characteristics of Hallandale soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in this map unit are small areas of Pineda and Riviera, limestone substratum soils in slough landscape positions. These soils make up about 7 to 21 percent of the unit. The permeability of this soil is moderate. The available water capacity is very low. In most years, under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is between 6 to 18 inches of the surface of 1 to 6 months. In other months, the water table is below 18 inches and recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Rarely is it above the surface. Natural vegetation consists mostly of South Florida slash pine, cabbage palm, sawpalmetto, wax myrtle, chalky bluestem and pineland threeawn. This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops because of wetness and droughtiness. The number of adapted crops is limited unless very intensive management practices are followed. With good water control and soil improving measures, the soil can be made suitable form many fruit and vegetable crops. A water control system is needed to remove excess water in wet season and provide water through subsurface irrigation in dry seasons. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Fertilizer and lime should be added according to the need of the crops. With proper water control, the soil is well suited to citrus. Water control systems that maintain good drainage to an effective depth are needed. Bedding the soil prior to planting provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high water table. A good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are young. With good water control management, this soil is well suited to pasture. A water control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. It is well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass and clover. Excellent pastures of grass or grass-clover mixtures can be grown with good management. Regular applications of fertilizers and controlled grazing are needed for highest yields. This soil is moderately suited for desirable range plant production. The dominant forage is creeping bluestem, lopsided indiangrass, pineland threeawn and chalky 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 14 bluestem. Management practices should include deferred grazing and brush control. This Boca soil is in the South Florida Flatwood range site. This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses because of wetness. If this soil is used as septic tank absorption fields, it should be mounded to maintain the system well above the seasonal high water table. For recreational uses, this soil also has severe limitations because of wetness, but with proper drainage to remove excess surface water during wet periods, many of these limitations can be overcome. This Boca soil is in capability subclass IIIw. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 15 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS (POST-DEVELOPMENT) 4 .1 PROPOSED PROJECT The purpose of the proposed Hatcher Parcel addition is to develop a new residential community within the north eastern Collier County area as an addition to the Esplanade development. The location of the project is in a region where there is currently a demand for home sites with access to community amenities such are found within the development (golf, pool, clubhouse) as well as within the general Collier County area (beaches, shopping, etc.). 4 .2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 4.2.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts Development of the proposed project will impact wetlands though the wetlands to be impacted are isolated and may not be jurisdictional to the USACE. The proposed development will result in direct, permanent impacts on the project site to a total of 2.12 acres of wetlands. Please see attached Exhibit (Sheet 03) for more detail. As used herein, the term "direct impacts" refers to actions that will result in the complete elimination of jurisdictional areas (i.e. dredging and filling). The wetlands proposed to be impacted are relatively low functioning wetlands due to past impacts and exotic vegetation infestation. UMAM score for the existing functional values of the wetland to be impacted is 0.43. 4.2.2 Temporary Impacts All impacts associated with this project are expected to be permanent in nature. 4.2.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands & Water Resources The isolation of the wetlands on site from adjacent wetlands means that there will not be any secondary impacts associated with the proposed Hatcher Parcel addition. 4.2.4 Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands No cumulative impacts are expected as a result of this project. The development of this property will not increase the development likelihood of adjacent parcels and any wetland impacts associated with those parcels will have to be mitigated through the proper permitting channels. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 16 4 .3 PRESERVATION OF WETLANDS, OTHER SURFACE WATERS, AND UPLANDS Development of the proposed Hatcher Parcel properties will impact 2.12 acres of wetlands. The proposed project will impact predominately disturbed, exotic infested habitat areas on the property. Higher quality native wetland areas have been preserved elsewhere in the PUD. All of the preserved areas have been enhanced through the removal of exotic vegetation and improvements to hydrology. All of the existing preserved areas have been placed under appropriate conservation easements as required, which protects the future integrity of the wetland and upland habitats contained in these areas. Appropriate access easements have also been provided to insure future maintenance of the preserve areas can be undertaken. All Preserve areas are delineated and marked with appropriate signage identifying the preserve boundary and restrictions associated with the preserve. Signage is placed at least 150 feet apart and no more than 300 feet apart along all interfaces with the development. 4 .4 PROJECT IMPACTS TO LISTED SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species was conducted on the project site by THA biologists in 2014 and updated in late 2017. No listed animals were observed directly or indirectly by THA biologists during this survey. There are a few listed animal species which could have the potential to occur in certain habitats present on-site. These species include but are not limited to the indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi), tricolor heron (Egretta tricolor), roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger), and Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus). The probability of these animals utilizing suitable on-site habitats ranges from high to low depending on the particular species. None of these species currently reside or nest on-site. The following subsections provide an assessment of the proposed project’s potential impacts to various listed animal species. The species addressed include those observed on or in close proximity to the subject property as well as certain species that could potentially occur on the Hatcher Parcel site or on nearby off-site parcels. Wood Storks (Mycteria americana) No wood stork nests, rookeries, or roosting sites have been found on the subject property though foraging in the freshwater marsh area created in the southwest corner 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 17 of the Esplanade property has been documented in November and December of the past few years. The closest documented wood stork colony is located approximately 8 miles to the northeast at Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary. The site is not appropriate for foraging due to the dense understory and minimal hydrologic regime. The proposed project will impact 2.12 acres of wetlands on-site, however these areas are of low foraging value for the wood stork. The foraging opportunities provided can vary significantly during a given year due to a wide array of factors that include but are not limited to: water levels present; variable abundance of prey species; and available access of prey species to wetland areas. Proposed Determination of Effect: Given these considerations, use of the USFWS Wood Stork Key, outlined in the USFWS South Florida Programmatic Concurrence Letter dated January 25, 2010 and the May 18, 2010 addendum, to conduct a sequential effect determination for the species resulted in the following key sequential determination: A-B-C-E-NLAA and it is concluded that the proposed project “may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect” wood storks (MANLAA). Various Listed Wading Birds Snowy egrets (Egretta thula), little blue herons (Egretta caerulea), and white ibis (Eudocimus alba) could use the wetlands on-site and have been documented within the vicinity of the site. No nests of these species have been observed within the project area. In addition to these species, other listed wading birds that could frequent appropriate habitats within the project area include roseate spoonbills (Platalea ajaja), tricolor herons (Egretta tricolor), and limpkins (Aramus guarauna). Development of the project area will result in the loss of 2.12 acres of on-site wetlands that could be utilized by the wading birds mentioned, though it is important to note that this wetland is infested by exotic vegetation and does not have a sufficient hydrologic regime to provide high quality foraging opportunities. The on-site preserves located elsewhere in the development provide over 900 acres of more appropriate on-site habitats that could be utilized by foraging wading birds in addition to lake shorelines where foraging activities can be observed. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) No indigo snakes have been observed on-site, however the majority of the project area could provide some habitat for indigo snakes. Considering their elusive nature, their large home range, and the wide array of habitats they may utilize, there is potential that indigo snakes could occasionally frequent portions of the project area. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 18 Proposed Determination of Effect: In consideration of these points and given the potential probability of any indigo snakes occurring on the project lands, use of the USFWS Eastern Indigo Snake Key outlined in the USFWS’ North and South Florida Programmatic Concurrence Letter, dated January 25, 2010 and the August 13, 2013 Addendum, to conduct a sequential effect determination for the species resulted in the following key sequential determination: A-B-C-D-E-NLAA and results in a ”May affect, not likely to adversely affect” determination for this species. Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus) The Florida bonneted bat (FBB) utilizes habitats such as hardwoods and pinelands for foraging. The project area does contain some pine flatwoods and cypress-pine-palm habitats suitable for Florida bonneted bat foraging though it is important to note that much of this habitat is densely forested which would preclude bat flight through the forested areas. Much of this habitat will be impacted with the development of the proposed project, however, following the enhancement activities, the entire preserve area will consist of open forested habitat suitable for Florida bonneted bat foraging. The project site is located within the FBB consultation area that has been designated by FWS. Surveys of the site have been conducted to search for potential roosts. Cavity trees observed were examined to determine if any roosting was present. To date no evidence of any bat presence on the site has been observed. Proposed Determination of Effect: Based on our analysis of the existing conditions of the site, the proposed, enhanced, open forested preserve areas, and the lack of any documented FBB presence, our proposed determination is that the proposed project “may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect” MANLAA the FBB. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger) The Big Cypress Fox Squirrel has not been observed on-site however they have been known to utilize habitats such as cypress, cypress-pine-cabbage palm, and pine flatwoods that do exist on the project site. Much of the habitat has been infested with exotic vegetation which limits fox squirrel use and foraging. The proposed project would result in impacts to 2.12 acres of hydric pine, and 1.71 acres of mesic pine flatwoods. Fox squirrels have been shown in many locations to prefer suburban habitats including golf courses and low-density residential areas and have been documented within the preserve areas located elsewhere in the PUD boundary. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 19 4 .5 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) indicated that there were no recorded sites in close proximity to the proposed project. Should any archaeological evidence be discovered during construction, the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 4 .6 PRESERVE MANAGEMENT P LAN The Management Plan for the short and long-term enhancement and maintenance activities underway within the PUD preserves will not be amended as a result of this parcel addition. All components of the existing management plan will remain in place as previously approved. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 20 5.0 PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH CCME The following Section outlines how the project is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Each of the 13 Goals of the CCME is listed along with how that Goal is applicable to the proposed project. For those Goals that are not applicable, no further description is included. GOAL 1: TO PLAN FOR THE PROTECTION, CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT AND APPROPRIATE USE OF THE COUNTY’S NATURAL RESOURCES. This Goal is more applicable to the County process in general than to any single project. The project has used data available from the County resources to plan the project and protect species, habitats, and resources to the greatest extent practicable. GOAL 2: TO PROTECT THE COUNTY’S SURFACE AND ESTUARINE WATER RESOURCES. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. The project will also be reviewed by County reviewers during the PUD and SDP applications. Surface water management, water quality concerns, and outfall quantities and locations will all undergo review and will be consistent with any regional or local Watershed Management Plans. The Project stormwater will meet all applicable State and Local water quality criteria. GOAL 3: TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S GROUND WATER RESOURCES TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST WATER QUALITY PRACTICAL. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. Groundwater extractions for the purposes of irrigation may be permitted upon SFWMD review. Any irrigation use will be monitored to ensure that adverse impacts to groundwater resources are not adversely impacted. GOAL 4: TO CONSERVE, PROTECT AND APPROPRIATELY MANAGE THE COUNTY'S FRESH WATER RESOURCES. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. Groundwater extractions for the purposes of irrigation may be permitted upon SFWMD review. If applicable and available, the Project will utilize treated effluent (re-use) water for irrigation. GOAL 5: TO PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRI ATELY USE THE COUNTY’S MINERAL AND SOIL RESOURCES. No mineral extraction is contemplated on the Project property. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 21 The Project will utilize appropriate BMPs to protect soils on the project site from erosion or disturbance during construction activities. Silt fencing, protective barriers, berms, and swales could all be used during construction activities on the site. GOAL 6: TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. The Project as proposed is consistent with Goal 6 and its objectives specifically; Objective 6.1 – The Project will preserve a minimum of 60% of the existing native habitat on the project site due to the density blending allowances provided during the original PUD approval. The PUD currently provides 965 acres of preserved lands of which approximately 791.7 acres meet the native habitat criteria. The PUD, with the proposed addition of the Hatcher parcels needs to provide at least 545.79 acres of native preserve. This number is far surpassed with the existing preserve areas. All preserves are being maintained to control exotic vegetation per the County code requirements. Objective 6.2 – The PUD preserves higher quality functional wetlands within the project boundary and will appropriately mitigate for any lost functions associated with the addition of the Hatcher Parcels through purchase of mitigation credits from an approved wetland mitigation bank. Valuation of the functionality of the wetlands to be impacted and the mitigation requirements will be reviewed by both the SFWMD and the USACE as part of the ERP review process. Objective 6.5 – Appropriate buffers and setbacks from construction activities on the project site will be maintained from the adjacent properties to the south and east. GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY’S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. The Project as proposed is consistent with Goal 7 and its objectives specifically; Objective 7.1 – The Project has conducted a Protected Species Survey over the Project lands. This survey will be updated periodically during the permitting process to ensure that new species do not take up residence on the Project lands without knowledge. Species Management Plans have been completed for the PUD which outline how the project minimizes the risk of adversely impacting any protected species. These plans will not change with the addition of the Hatcher Parcels. Coordination and review with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) will be undertaken to ensure that potential impacts to state and federally protected species are minimized. GOAL 8: TO MAINTAIN COLLIER COUNTY'S EXISTING AIR QUALITY. The Project will comply with all applicable State and Federal air quality standards. All site construction equipment will be maintained appropriately in terms of emissions standards and potential air pollution. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade RPUD Hatcher Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement September 2018 22 GOAL 9: TO APPROPRIATELY MANAGE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S POPULOUS AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. This Goal is more applicable to County efforts than to individual projects. Consistent with Objective 9.3, the project will encourage resident participation in hazardous waste collection days to try and help insure that household hazardous wastes are disposed of properly in coordination with the County’s efforts. GOAL 10: TO PROTECT, CONSERVE, MANAGE, AND APPROPRIATELY USE THE COUNTY’S COASTAL BARRIERS INCLUDING SHORELINES, BEACHES AND DUNES AND PLAN FOR, AND WHERE APPROPRIATE, RESTRICT ACTIVITIES WHERE SUCH ACTIVITIES WILL DAMAGE OR DESTROY COASTAL RESOURCES. This Project will not affect any coastal barriers, dunes, beaches, shorelines, or any other coastal resources. GOAL 11: TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROTECTION, RESERVATION, AND SENSITIVE RE-USE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES. This Project will not affect any historical or archaeological properties or resources. GOAL 12: TO MAKE EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH AND WELFARE OF PEOPLE AND PROPERTY FROM THE EFFECTS OF HURRICANE STORM DAMAGE. The Project is not located within the County’s Coastal High Hazard Area. All building construction on the Project will be subject to building code regulation and will adhere to construction standards with respect to wind loadings and hurricane protection. On- site construction will have a hurricane preparedness plan outlining steps to follow should a hurricane approach while site construction is under way. GOAL 13: TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DUPLICATION OF EXISTING REGULATORY PROGRAMS. The Project will undergo review by the SFWMD, and FWC. Review by USACE and FWS is not expected due to the fact that no federal jurisdictional areas will be impacted by the development. All correspondence and permitting undertaken with these agencies will be provided to the County upon request to assist with County review and minimize duplication of permitting efforts. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.283452<> LONGITUDE:W 81.692474SITE ADDRESS:<> 4190 & 4200 BROKEN BACK RDNAPLES, FL 34119Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1836-TM-Broken Back Rd\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1836-COUNTY.dwg LOCATION 9/13/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-12-181836-2226HATCHER PARCELS - ESPLANADELOCATION MAP48-------------------01 OF 09COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTY)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTYBROKEN BACK RD 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 225Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,4190 & 4200 BROKEN BACK RDNAPLESFL34119Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1836-TM-Broken Back Rd\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1836-COUNTY.dwg EX AERIAL 9/13/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-12-181836-2226HATCHER PARCELS - ESPLANADEEXISTING AERIAL48-------------------02 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MHW (NAVD)=··MLW (NAVD)=NOTES:"RHODES AND RHODES"04-02-18-XX.XX'+XX.XX'XX.XXXX.XXXX.XXCOLLIER BLVD HATCHERPARCELSPROPERTYESPLANADE GOLF ANDCOUNTRY CLUBPROPERTY BOUNDARYBROKEN BACK RD 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 226Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & NESW050100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1836-TM-Broken Back Rd\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1836-COUNTY.dwg FLUCCS 9/13/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-12-181836-2226HATCHER PARCELS - ESPLANADEFLUCCS MAP48-------------------03 OF 09IDFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)1111FIXED SINGLE FAMILY UNITS <LESSTHAN TWO DWELLING UNITS PERACRE>0.992427E3LIVE OAK (EXOTICS 50-75%)1.973411E2PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 25-50%)0.484625E3HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS(EXOTICS 50-75%)2.125111FIXED SINGLE FAMILY UNITS <LESSTHAN TWO DWELLING UNITS PERACRE>0.416524POND0.077740DISTURBED LAND1.158411PINE FLATWOODS1.239243ORNAMENTALS0.6110243ORNAMENTALS0.98TOTAL10.01·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RHODES AND RHODES"04-02-18625E3427E3111243111524740243WATER (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):10.010.07UPLAND (ACRES):7.82WETLAND (ACRES):2.12411411E2427E3427E316234578910HATCHERPARCELSPROPERTY9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 227Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & NESW050100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1836-TM-Broken Back Rd\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1836-COUNTY.dwg NAT HABITAT 9/13/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-12-181836-2226HATCHER PARCELS - ESPLANADENATIVE HABITAT MAP48-------------------04 OF 09IDFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)2427E3LIVE OAK (EXOTICS 50-75%)1.973411E2PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 25-50%)0.484625E3HYDRIC PINE FLATWOODS(EXOTICS 50-75%)2.128411PINE FLATWOODS1.23TOTAL5.80·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RHODES AND RHODES"04-02-18625E3427E3111243111524740243411411E2427E3427E316234578910HATCHERPARCELSPROPERTYNATIVE HABITAT9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 228Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & P:\1836-TM-Broken Back Rd\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1836-COUNTY.dwg 9/13/2018NESW050100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1836-TM-Broken Back Rd\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1836-COUNTY.dwg PRO AERIAL 9/13/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-12-181836-2226HATCHER PARCELS - ESPLANADEPROPOSED AERIAL48-------------------05 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RHODES AND RHODES"04-02-18HATCHERPARCELSPROPERTYR/GR/G9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 229Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & NESW050100200SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1836-TM-Broken Back Rd\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1836-COUNTY.dwg IMPACTS 9/13/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-12-181836-2226HATCHER PARCELS - ESPLANADEIMPACTS MAP48-------------------06 OF 09625E3427E3111243111524740243411411E2427E3427E316234578910·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RHODES AND RHODES"04-02-18WATER IMPACT (SQ FT)WETLAND IMPACT (SQ FT)92,3303,052HATCHERPARCELSPROPERTY9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 230Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1836-TM-Broken Back Rd\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1836-COUNTY.dwg SOILS 9/13/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-12-181836-2226HATCHER PARCELS - ESPLANADESOILS MAP48-------------------07 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·SOIL DATA PROVIDED BY:1998 UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULTURESOIL SURVEY OF COLLIER COUNTY AREA, FL"RHODES AND RHODES"04-02-18CODEDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC14PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONESUBSTRATUMYES21BOCA FINE SAND142121HATCHERPARCELSPROPERTY9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 231Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & info733.1 Ac.±31,934,715 sq. ft.ROSE BOULEVARDWOODLAND AVE.NURSERY LANE2116152221282227152214231015111410119161015910222723283243NESW0125025005000SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:P:\1836-TM-Broken Back Rd\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1836-COUNTY.dwg SITE ON ESPANADE 9/13/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-12-181836-2226HATCHER PARCELS - ESPLANADESITE ON ESPANADE48-------------------08 OF 09HATCHERPARCELSPROPERTYBOUNDARYESPLANADE GOLF ANDCOUNTRY CLUBPROPERTY BOUNDARYCONCEPTUALCLUB HOUSECOMPLEXLOCATION9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 232Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 105411e21.57 AC122411e20.29 AC121411e21.20 AC102411e20.56 AC.103621e11.16 AC42621e21.31 AC41621e22.81 AC66411e20.64 AC69411e20.48 AC64411e21.58 AC61411e20.35 AC4442452.93 AC50411e218.13 AC47411e22.27 AC51411e14.20 AC5342411.68 AC56411e20.30 AC59411e22.57 AC62411e21.43 AC76625e22.99 AC75411e21.69 AC7442414.19 AC87411e110.00 AC49424105.47 AC45625e212.12 AC464243.29 AC40624e33.45 AC14242.37 AC2411e331.61 AC3621e12.50 AC5411e21.13 AC442449.00 AC8621e20.22 AC9411e22.59 AC28625e319.02 AC29621e15.57 AC26625e312.44 AC27411e21.06 AC25411e20.15 AC2142453.83 AC20411e28.73 AC22411e22.29 AC24624e25.76 AC23621e11.49 AC67625e328.37 AC654248.91 AC52625e35.99 AC63625e220.15 AC60625e312.11 AC945400.19 AC89625e38.41 AC88625e21.16 AC49424105.47 AC68625e26.22 AC735400.08 AC78411e20.81 AC10411e21.83 AC104624e31.30 AC37625e330.91 AC38621e10.88 AC71621e30.37 AC77625e367.73 AC43621e11.82 AC30411e124.03 AC7411e250.47 AC314249.24 AC33621e20.69 AC11411e22.50 AC19621e10.57 AC1842433.14 AC17621e26.34 AC16411e20.68 AC.15625e29.71 AC1842433.14 AC7411e250.47 AC1434228.02 AC138624e32.53 AC132411e211.49 AC1334223.57 AC107621e23.46 AC126411ee2.21 AC117411e112.36 AC123625e311.68 AC108625e36.37 AC101621e121.68 AC106624e34.72 AC141625e312.44 AC100411e112.60 AC77625e367.73 AC99411e20.73 AC974247.55 AC92625e21.41 AC96411e21.66 AC95411e20.57 AC90625e330.64 AC91625e321.32 AC1564242.79 AC157624e10.29 AC.54411e23.48 AC55625e12.35 AC79411e21.60 AC57625e28.13 AC58411e21.75 AC83411e23.41 AC86624e220.43 AC80621e118.57 AC814245.77 AC84625e21.93 AC8542415.49 AC82621e20.39 AC98411e25.20 AC13542419.57 AC129621e13.67 AC139625e325.99 AC1304242.71 AC1314245.34 AC134621e19.11 AC136621e215.38 AC137625e29.28 AC142411e21.53 AC140411e22.30 AC124411e22.56 AC120411e20.54 AC110411e22.60 AC118411e21.07 AC112411e22.85 AC119411e27.63 AC125625e332.89 AC115625e212.61 AC109624e34.43 AC11642462.52 AC113411e20.94 AC111625e36.59 AC114424107.97 AC934242.85 AC12742442.41 AC128411e30.16 AC35625e36.80 AC181411e11.85 AC182621e10.06 AC185621e10.18 AC1901402.78 AC188411e20.26 AC180625e19.41 ACROW (4.92 AC)18921117.31 AC32621e10.82 AC6621e22.28 AC34621e21.74 AC36617e11.39 AC70621e32.60 AC39621e13.93 AC12643e24.29 AC186411e19.48 AC183621e121.69 AC18442413.36 AC187624e23.65 AC13621e14.36 AC14624e22.67 AC48621e11.66 AC4221.32 AC624E38.39 AC624E25.83 AC6191.70 AC411 1.56 AC4110.04 AC6190.82 AC411E20.48 AC625E32.12 AC7401.15 AC2430.98 AC2430.61 AC4111.23 AC1110.99 AC427E31.97 AC1110.41 AC5240.07 AC7242473.92 ACNESW0 1250 25005000SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REVISION:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:TAB NAME:SCALE:SHEET:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:THRMJ09-12-181836-2226HATCHER PARCELS - ESPLANADEOVERALL NATIVE HABITAT48-------------------09 OF 09HATCHERPARCELSPROPERTYBOUNDARYESPLANADE GOLF ANDCOUNTRY CLUBPROPERTY BOUNDARYCONCEPTUALCLUB HOUSECOMPLEXLOCATIONNATIVE PRESERVE (791.7 AC.)LEGENDNATIVE VEGETATION903.8 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION (>25% NATIVE CANOPY)GMP REQUIRES 60% PRESERVATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION. FOR THIS SITE, A MINIMUM OF 542.3 ACRES OF NATIVE VEGETATION MUST BE PRESERVED. THE ORIGINALLY APPROVED SITE PLAN PROVIDED 523.3 ACRES OF NATIVE PRESERVE. 31.8 ACRES ARE CONVERTED TO WOODSTORK FORAGING IMPROVEMENTS AND ARE NOT COUNTED IN THE NATIVE PRESERVE CALCULATIONS. THE EXOTIC REMOVAL AND HABITAT ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES TO DATE HAVE RESULTED IN AN ADDITIONAL 268.4 ACRES OF NATIVE PRESERVE IN ADDITION TO THE ORIGINAL NATIVE PRESERVE ACREAGEWOODSTORK FORAGING IMPROVEMENTS (31.8 AC.)9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 233Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 234Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 235Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: March 26, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXHIBIT A FOR ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 1,233 1,184 residential units and a maximum of 18 golf course holes may be developed within the RPUD. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: March 26, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXHIBIT B FOR ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table 1 below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in the applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP) or subdivision plat. TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR “RG” RESIDENTIAL AREAS PERMITTED USES AND STANDARDS Single Family Detached Zero Lot Line Two Family And Duplex Townhouse *12 Multi- Family Dwelling *12 Clubhouse/ Recreation Buildings *6 Principal Structures Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per lot or unit *3 2,000 SF 9,000 SF n/a Minimum Lot Width *4 50’ *7 40’ *7 35’ per lot or unit *7 20’ 90’ n/a Front Yard Setback 2* 20’ *2 *7 20’ *2 *7 20’ *2 *7 20’ *2 20’ *2 25’ Side Yard Setback 5’ *11 0 or 10’ 7.5’ *8 7.5’ *8 10’ or 1/2 BH for structures exceeding 35 feet *5 5’ Rear Yard Setback *1 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 0’ Setback From Golf Course 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 20’ Setbacks from Preserves 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ Maximum Zoned Height *10 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 50’ (5 stories not to exceed 50’) *9 50’ Actual Height *10 45’ 45’ 45’ 45’ 65’ 75’ Floor Area Min. Per Unit (S.F) 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 750 SF n/a Distance Between Principal Structures 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 20’or ½ SUM of BH for structures exceeding 35’ *5 15’ or .5 BH whichever is greater *6 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: March 26, 2019 Accessory Structures Single Family Detached Zero Lot Line Two Family And Duplex Townhouse Multi- Family Dwelling Clubhouse/ Recreation Buildings *6 Front Yard Setback*2 SPS *7 SPS *7 SPS SPS SPS SPS Side Yard Setback 5’ 0 or 10’ 5’ 5’ 10’ or 1/2 BH for structures exceeding 35 feet *5 5’ Rear Yard Accessory Setback *1 5’ 5’ 5’ 5’ 10’ 5’ Setback From Preserves 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ Distance Between Accessory and Principal Structures on Same lot 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ Distance Between Accessory and Principal Structures on Same lot 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ Maximum Zoned Height *10 SPS SPS SPS SPS 35’ 35’ Actual Height *10 SPS SPS SPS SPS 45’ 45’ Front Yards for all uses shall be measured as follows: If the parcel is served by a public road right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). * 1 – Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lakes and open spaces. Setbacks from lakes for all principal and accessory uses may be 0 feet provided architectural treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from the Collier County Engineering Division. 0’ principal and accessory setbacks are permitted from lake maintenance easements. *2 - Single-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage driveways may reduce the front yard requirement to 10 feet for a side entry garage. Multi-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and provide for guest parking may reduce the front yard to 15 feet. This reduction shall not result in an approval to impede or block the sidewalk. Front loaded garages shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk. *3 - Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 square feet for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet. *4 Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. *5 - Building distance may be reduced at garages to half the sum of the height of the garages. *6 Although neither setbacks nor separation between structures are applicable to the clubhouse and other recreation structures located on a clubhouse tract, neither the clubhouse nor any other recreational structure shall be located closer than 25 feet from any residential or preservation boundary 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: March 26, 2019 *7 – The use of flag lots is allowed to provide maximum flexibility in subdivision design and may vary from the minimum lot widths. However, neither the minimum lot area, nor the minimum distance between structures may be reduced. *8 – Zero foot (0’) setback for internal units. *9 Inclusive of under building parking *10 Buildings shall not exceed three stories within 1,250 feet of Immokalee Road. *11 5’ side yard setbacks shall apply to lots equal to or less than 70’ in width. Lots greater than 70’ in width will provide 6’ side yard setbacks. *12 Maximum length of buildings shall not exceed 300 linear feet. BH = Building Height SPS = Same as Principal Structure Notwithstanding the foregoing; none of the footnotes shall operate as a deviation from the Land Development Code unless they are listed as deviations on Exhibit E. None of the footnotes operate as deviations from the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) ROSE BOULEVARDWOODLAND AVE.NURSERY LANEOLDE CYPRESS (PUD) PRESERVE ADDIES CORNER (MPUD) MIXED USE HERITAGE BAY (PUD) RESIDENTIAL TERAFINA (PUD) PRESERVE MAINTENANCE FACILITY PROPERTY BOUNDARY ENTRY SIGNAGE (TYP.) TREE FARM (PUD) RESIDENTIAL 100' PROPOSED C.R. 951 EXT. R.O.W. DEDICATION PROPERTY BOUNDARY 15' TYPE 'B' L.B.E. 20' TYPE 'D' L.B.E. (EXCEPT WHERE ABUTTING MAINTENANCE FACILITY, TYPE "B") SFWMD PRESERVE 21 16 15 22 21 28 22 27 15 22 14 23 22 27 23 28 CONCEPTUAL CLUB HOUSE COMPLEX LOCATION ENTRY SIGNAGE (TYP.) 20' TYPE 'D' L.B.E.PLATEAU ROADIMMOKALEE ROAD (C.R. 846) L L L L L L L L L L L L L LLL L L L L L L L R/G R/G R/G R/G R/G R/G R/G R/G R/G R/G L L L L R/G POSSIBLE FUTURE INTERCONNECT L L (A) SINGLE- FAMILY R/G R/G PRIVATE SPINE ROAD PRIVATE SPINE ROAD BUFFER PER LDC BUFFER PER LDC 15' TYPE 'B' L.B.E. 15' TYPE 'B' L.B.E 15' TYPE 'B' L.B.E. 15' TYPE 'B' L.B.E. TREE FARM (PUD) RESIDENTIAL HERITAGE BAY (PUD) RESIDENTIAL 10 - ACRE ADDITION R/G SHEET: FILE NAME:B:\Projects\276-44 (Esplanade Naples) Hatcher Properties\Drawings-Exhibits\276-44-E09 Master Plan\Current Plans\27644E0901.dwgWALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 27644E0901.dwg 1 OF 3 NORTH SCALE: 1" = 1000' ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT "C2" SEE SHEET #2 FOR CONTINUATION NOTE: FOR PLAN LEGEND AND SPECIAL NOTES SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 TAYLOR MORRISON OF FLORIDA, INC 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) info733.1 A c . ± 31,934, 7 1 5 s q . f t . LEE COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY PARKLANDS (PUD) PRESERVE (A) VACANT OUT PARCEL OWNER: FLAMAX LLC (A) VACANT (A) VACANT TERAFINA (PUD) PRESERVE 10 15 11 14 10 11 9 16 10 15 9 10 3 243 L L L L L R/G R/G R/G R/GL L PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHEET: FILE NAME:B:\Projects\276-44 (Esplanade Naples) Hatcher Properties\Drawings-Exhibits\276-44-E09 Master Plan\Current Plans\27644E0901.dwgWALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 27644E0901.dwg 2 OF 3 NORTH SCALE: 1" = 1000' ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT "C2" SEE SHEET #1 FOR CONTINUATIONNOTE: FOR PLAN LEGEND AND SPECIAL NOTES SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 TAYLOR MORRISON OF FLORIDA, INC 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL / GOLF CONCEPTUAL LAKE LOCATIONS RIGHT-OF-WAY SPECIAL NOTES: 1) WHERE APPLICABLE ALONG PROJECT BOUNDARY AND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PRESERVE AREAS SHALL SERVE AS BUFFERS. IF AFTER EXOTIC REMOVAL THE PRESERVE VEGETATION FAILS TO MEET MINIMUM CODE BUFFER STANDARDS ADDITIONAL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REQUIRED. NATIVE VEGETATION SUMMARY: EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION = 909.65 Ac. ± REQUIRED NATIVE PRESERVE = 545.8 Ac. ± (909.65 Ac. ± x 60%) PROVIDED NATIVE PRESERVE (ON SITE) = 965.66 Ac. ± LAND USE AREAS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO RELOCATION/CHANGE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PERMITTING. * * R/G L ACREAGE SUMMARY: SECTION 22 = 455.5 Ac. ± SECTION 15 = 634.6 Ac. ± SECTION 10 = 578.2 Ac. ± TOTAL = 1,668.3 Ac. ± TOTAL AREA OUTSIDE DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY = 928.8 Ac. ± TOTAL AREA WITHIN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY = 739.5 Ac. ± * 10-ACRE ADDITION SHEET: FILE NAME:B:\Projects\276-44 (Esplanade Naples) Hatcher Properties\Drawings-Exhibits\276-44-E09 Master Plan\Current Plans\27644E0901.dwgWALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 27644E0901.dwg 3 OF 3 ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT "C2" TAYLOR MORRISON OF FLORIDA, INC 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: March 26, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXHIBIT D FOR ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) PARCELS: 1) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, 2) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 3) THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 4) THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 AND ALL OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAAND ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: March 26, 2019 SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 3/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: March 26, 2019 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS ACCESS EASEMENT FOR HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. CONTAINING 1658.3 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) PARCELS: 1) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, 2) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 3) THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 4) THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 AND ALL OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: March 26, 2019 NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 3/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: March 26, 2019 AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS ACCESS EASEMENT FOR HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. AND THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 1668.31 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: March 26, 2019 EXHIBIT F FOR ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * B. TRANSPORTATION 3. a. Proportionate Share Payment The Developer, its successors, or assigns, agree that at the time of issuance of a building permit for the 400th residential dwelling unit authorized by this PUD, or commencement of construction of the intersection improvements, the Developer, or its successors or assigns, shall be responsible for their respective fair share of the North leg of the CR- 951/ Broken Back Road intersection with Immokalee Road based on 1, 233 units, which includes modification, replacement, or relocation of the at- grade bridge crossing the Cocohatchee Canal. ba. Timing Restriction The Developer agrees that no building permits may be sought for the final 112 residential units, or equivalent per 42 Unadjusted Two-Way PM peak hour trips, until such time that adequate roadway and intersection capacity has been constructed for the intersection of CR 951 extension and Immokalee Road, and is available to accommodate these units. However, if adequate roadway and intersection capacity is not available within four (4) years of this PUD amendment approval, and the Developer has prepaid impact fees in full for all 1, 233 residential units, building permits may be sought for the final 112 residential units, or equivalent per 42 Unadjusted Two-Way PM peak hour trips. * * * * * * * * * * * * * C. ENVIRONMENTAL The project shall retain a minimum of 542.3 545.8 acres of native vegetation on-site in compliance with the Growth Management Plan. Easements or ROW created for access to outparcels within the preserve or for future extension of the CR-951 corridor shall not cause the preserve to fall below the minimum native vegetation retention requirement. The location of the 0.8-acre preserve area provided on the 10-acre addition (Parcel no. 00190040200 and 00187520005) is approximate and subject to change at time of SDP or plat permitting so long as a minimum of 0.8 acres is provided within the 10-acre addition. * * * * * * * * * * * * * G. PLANNING 1. The developer shall complete construction of the golf course and temporary golf pro shop/locker room prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for the 100th dwelling unit. The developer shall complete construction of the permanent golf pro shop/locker room prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy for 50% of the approved units, or 616 units. 2. The 112 dwelling units added to the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD through this PUD amendment approval dated Oct. 14, 2014 must be developed within the 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: March 26, 2019 19.7-acre parcel to the east of private spine road in Section 22 (Parcel no. 00187360003) or the 10-acre parcel to the south of Torre Vista Lane in Section 22 (Parcel nos. 00190040200 and 00187520005). A maximum of 34 single-family detached dwelling units (of the 112 dwelling units added) are permitted on the 10-acre parcel (Parcel nos. 00190040200 and 00187520005). * * * * * * * * * * * * * I. MISCELLANEOUS 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) info733.1 Ac.±31,934,715 sq. ft.ROSE BOULEVARDWOODLAND AVE.NURSERY LANELEE COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYOLDECYPRESS(PUD)PRESERVEADDIESCORNER(MPUD)MIXED USEHERITAGE BAY(PUD)RESIDENTIALTERAFINA(PUD)PRESERVEPARKLANDS(PUD)PRESERVEMAINTENANCEFACILITY PROPERTYBOUNDARYENTRY SIGNAGE(TYP.)(A)VACANTTREE FARM(PUD)RESIDENTIAL100' PROPOSED C.R. 951 EXT.R.O.W. DEDICATIONOUT PARCELOWNER: FLAMAXLLC(A)VACANT(A)VACANTPROPERTYBOUNDARY15' TYPE'B' L.B.E.20' TYPE 'D' L.B.E. (EXCEPT WHEREABUTTING MAINTENANCE FACILITY,TYPE "B")TERAFINA(PUD)PRESERVESFWMDPRESERVE211615222128222715221423101511141011916101591022272328CONCEPTUALCLUB HOUSECOMPLEXLOCATIONENTRYSIGNAGE(TYP.)20' TYPE'D' L.B.E.PRESERVERESIDENTIAL / GOLFCONCEPTUAL LAKE LOCATIONSRIGHT-OF-WAYSPECIAL NOTES:1) WHERE APPLICABLE ALONG PROJECT BOUNDARY AND UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED PRESERVE AREAS SHALL SERVE AS BUFFERS.IF AFTER EXOTIC REMOVAL THE PRESERVE VEGETATION FAILS TOMEET MINIMUM CODE BUFFER STANDARDS ADDITIONAL PLANTMATERIAL SHALL BE REQUIRED.NATIVE VEGETATION SUMMARY:EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION = 909.65 Ac. ±REQUIRED NATIVE PRESERVE = 545.8 Ac. ± (909.65 Ac. ± x 60%)PROVIDED NATIVE PRESERVE (ON SITE) = 965.66 Ac. ±3243PLATEAU ROADIMMOKALEE ROAD (C.R. 846)LAND USE AREAS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TORELOCATION/CHANGE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PERMITTING.*LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLR/GR/GR/GR/GR/GR/GR/GR/GR/GR/GR/G* R/GLR/GACREAGE SUMMARY:SECTION 22 = 455.5 Ac. ±SECTION 15 = 634.6 Ac. ±SECTION 10 = 578.2 Ac. ±TOTAL = 1,668.3 Ac. ±TOTAL AREA OUTSIDE DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY = 928.8 Ac. ±TOTAL AREA WITHIN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY = 739.5 Ac. ±LLLLLR/GPOSSIBLE FUTUREINTERCONNECTLL(A)SINGLE-FAMILYR/GR/GPRIVATE SPINEROADPROPERTYBOUNDARYPRIVATESPINEROADBUFFERPER LDCBUFFERPER LDC15' TYPE'B' L.B.E.15' TYPE'B' L.B.E*15' TYPE'B' L.B.E.15' TYPE'B' L.B.E.TREE FARM(PUD)RESIDENTIALHERITAGE BAY(PUD)RESIDENTIAL10 - ACRE ADDITIONR/G10-ACRE ADDITIONinfo733.1 Ac.±31,934,715 sq. ft.RIGHT-OF-WAYSPECIAL NOTES:1) WHERE APPLICABLE ALONG PROJECT BOUNDARY AND UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED PRESERVE AREAS SHALL SERVE AS BUFFERS.IF AFTER EXOTIC REMOVAL THE PRESERVE VEGETATION FAILS TOMEET MINIMUM CODE BUFFER STANDARDS ADDITIONAL PLANTMATERIAL SHALL BE REQUIRED.NATIVE VEGETATION SUMMARY:EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION = 909.65 Ac. ±REQUIRED NATIVE PRESERVE = 545.8 Ac. ± (909.65 Ac. ± x 60%)PROVIDED NATIVE PRESERVE (ON SITE) = 965.66 Ac. ±LAND USE AREAS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TORELOCATION/CHANGE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PERMITTING.*ACREAGE SUMMARY:SECTION 22 = 455.5 Ac. ±SECTION 15 = 634.6 Ac. ±SECTION 10 = 578.2 Ac. ±TOTAL = 1,668.3 Ac. ±TOTAL AREA OUTSIDE DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY = 928.8 Ac. ±TOTAL AREA WITHIN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY = 739.5 Ac. ±*WALDROPENGINEERINGESPLANADE GOLFAND COUNTRY CLUBOF NAPLESRPUDTAYLOR MORRISON OFFLORIDA, INCEXHIBIT "C2" MASTERPLANCIVIL ENGINEERING & LANDDEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSB:\Projects\276-44 (Esplanade Naples) Hatcher Properties\Drawings-Exhibits\276-44-E09 Master Plan\Current Plans\27644E0901.dwg 3/11/2019 11:10:44 AM FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #863628100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comPROJECT LOCATION MAPIMMOKALEE RD. (C.R. 846)VANDERBILT BEACHROAD EXT.COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951)LEE COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYLOGAN BOULEVARD INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75 GOLDEN GATEBOULEVARDSCALE: 1" = 500'UPDATED:FILE NAME:2019/03/1127644E09019.A.1.gPacket Pg. 250Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. F orms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) T DR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 1 SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2 Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) / (239) 405-7899 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) OFF SITEDISCHARGEOFF SITEDISCHARGEOFF SITEDISCHARGEOFF SITEDISCHARGEPROPOSED 10±ACRE ADDITIONBASIN 2BASIN 1RPUD BOUNDARYB:\Projects\276-44 (Esplanade Naples) Hatcher Properties\Drawings-Exhibits\276-44-E11 Stormwater Management\Current Plans\27644E1102.dwgSHEET:FILE NAME:WALDROPENGINEERINGCIVIL ENGINEERING28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.comPLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE27644E1102.dwgESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRYCLUB OF NAPLES RPUDSTORMWATER MANAGMENTLEGENDEXISTING LAKELAKEINTERCONNECTSPOTENTIALSTORM WATERFLOW10± ACRE ADDITIONDISCHARGEDRAINAGE BASIN9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 256Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) ORDINANCE NO. 14- 36 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2009-21, THE MIRASOL RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AS AMENDED, BY INCREASING THE PERMISSIBLE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS FROM 1,121 TO 1,233; BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 19.7± ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) TO THE MIRASOL RPUD; BY CHANGING THE NAME OF THE RPUD FROM THE MIRASOL RPUD TO THE ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD; BY INCREASING THE DWELLING UNITS FROM 1,121 TO 1,233; BY REVISING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN AND REVISING DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR 846) BORDERED ON THE EAST BY FUTURE COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) IN SECTIONS 10, 15 AND 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 1,658.3± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PETITION PUDZA-PL20140000099] WHEREAS, TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC, represented by Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and Alexis Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the RPUD and change the zoning classification of the additional herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. The zoning classification of approximately 19.7 acres of the herein described real property located in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development RPUD) zoning district together with the existing Mirasol RPUD for a 1,658.3± acre project to be now known as the Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples RPUD in accordance with the revised Exhibits A-F, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. 14-CPS-01303/1117850/1184 Mirasol PUDZA\PUDZA-PL20140000099 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 9/18/14 CPO 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) SECTION TWO: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this /y f`_ day of C f h-Ur 2014. ATTEST:E ''" 14' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BI .C7C1(..CLERK COLLIER C T , FLORIDA By jolt. • 4- D uty G1;erk- TOM HE ING, U- .irman Attest as,tg L'iai iiar S signature on7 Approved as to form and legality: e A«i,IT C)L 1iy H di Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development Standards Exhibit B2 - Flag Lot Scenario Exhibit C2 - Master Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - Deviations Exhibit F - Developer Commitments 14-CPS-01303/1117850/1]84 Mirasol PUDZA\PUDZA-PL20140000099 Page 2 of 2 Rev. 9/18/14 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT A FOR MIRASOL ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 1,121 1,233 residential units and a maximum of 18 golf course holes may be developed within the RPUD. I. Residential/Golf Tracts (RG): A. Principal Uses: 1. Single-family detached dwelling units. 2. Zero lot line dwelling units. 3. Townhouse dwellings. 4. Two-family and duplex dwellings. 5. Multiple-family dwellings. 6. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner determines to be compatible in the "RG" district. B. Accessory Uses/Structures: 1. Uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted 2. Guest houses. 3. Common area recreation facilities for residents and their guests. 4. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters. 5. Model homes, model home sales centers, and sales trailers, including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, as well as resale and rental of units. 6. Golf course, practice areas and ranges, golf cart barns, rest rooms, shelters snack bars and golf course maintenance yards for residents and their guests. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 1 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 S 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 7. Golf Club Complex as located on the Master Plan: i) Retail establishments accessory to the permitted uses in the District such as, but not limited to, golf, tennis and recreation related sales for residents and their guests. ii) Restaurants, cocktail lounges, and similar uses for residents and their guests. iii) Pro-shops, golf club, tennis clubs, and health spas for residents and their guests. iv) Golf course, practice areas and ranges, golf cart barns, rest rooms, shelters snack bars and golf course maintenance yards and facilities. 8. Shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools, and other types of accessory facilities intended for outdoor recreation for residents and their guests. 9. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. 10. Essential services, pursuant to the LDC. 11. Water management facilities and related structures. 12. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or architectural or structural bank treatments. 13. Parks, recreational facilities, community centers for residents and their guests. 14. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the developer, builders, and their authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 15. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffer berms, fences and walls. 16. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner determines to be compatible in the "RG" district. II. Conservation/Preserve Tract: A. Principal Uses: 1. Passive recreation uses limited to the following so long as clearing for such uses does not result in the reduction of preserve acreage below the minimum requirement: PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 2 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) i. Boardwalks ii. Environmental uses (wetland and conservation areas) iii.Pedestrian bridges iv.Pervious nature trails except where American Disabilities Act requires otherwise. v. Native Wildlife sanctuary vi.Inclement weather shelters, in preserve upland areas only unless constructed as part of a permitted boardwalk system. The shelters shall be a maximum of 150 square feet each. 2. Environmental research 3. Drainage and water management facilities subject to all required permits. 4. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list or permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner through the process outlined in the LDC. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 3 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT B FOR MIRASOL ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan(SDP) or subdivision plat. TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RG" RESIDENTIAL AREAS Multi- Clubhouse/ PERMITTED Single Zero Two Family Townhouse Family Recreation USES Family Lot and Duplex 12 Dwelling Buildings AND Detached Line 12 6 STANDARDS Principal Structures Minimum Lot 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per 2,000 SF 9,000 SF n/a Area lot or unit 3 Minimum Lot 50' *7 40' *7 35'per lot 20'90' n/a Width*4 or unit*7 Front Yard 20' *2*7 20' *2*7 20' *2 *7 20' *2 20' *2 25' Setback 2* Side Yard 5' 0 or 10'7.5'17*8 7.5' *8 10'or 1/2 5' Setback*2 11 BH for structures exceeding 35 feet*5 Rear Yard 15'*7 10' 15'*7 10' 15'*7 10' -1 10' 45'10' 0' Setback*1 Setback From 10'*7 10'17 10' 10'10' 20' Golf Course Setbacks from 25' 25' 25' 25'25' 25' Preserves Maximum 35' 35' 35' 35'50'(5 stories 50'(2 stories Zoned Height not to ever-par-king-net 10 exceed 50') to exceed 50') 9 Actual Height 45' 45' 45' 45'65' 75' 10 Floor Area Min.Per Unit(S.F.) 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 750 SF n/a Distance 10' 10' 10' 10'20'or '/2 15'or.5 BH Between SUM of BH whichever is Principal for greater*6 Structures structures exceeding 35' *5 PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 4 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Single Zero Two Family Townhouse Multi- Clubhouse/ Family Lot and Duplex Family Recreation Accessory Detached Line Dwelling Buildings Structures 6 Front Yard SPS*7 SPS*7 SPS SPS SPS SPS Setback*2 Side Yard 5'17 0 or 10'5' 5' 10'or 1/2 5' Setback BH for structures exceeding 35 feet*5 Rear Yard 5'/7 5' 5' 5' 10' 5' Accessory Setback 1 Setback From 10' 10' 10' 10'10' 10' Preserves Distance O'or 10' O'or 10' O'or 10'O'or 10' O'or 10'O' or 10' Between Accessory Structures on the same lot Distance 0'or 5'0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' Between Accessory and Principal Structures on same lot Maximum SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' 35' Zoned Height 10 Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 45' 45' 10 Front yards for all uses shall be measured as follows: If the parcel is served by a public road right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). 1 - Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lakes and open spaces. Setbacks from lakes for all principal and accessory uses may be 0 feet provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from the Collier County Engineering Review Section. 2 - Single-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and provide for guest parking other than in private driveways may reduce the front yard requirement to 10 feet for a side entry garage. Multi-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and provide for guest parking may reduce the front yard to 15 feet. This reduction shall not result in an approval to impede or block the sidewalk. Front loaded garages shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk. 3 - Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 square feet for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet. 4—Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. 5- Building distance may be reduced at garages to half the sum of the height of the garages. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 5 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 C`1 O} 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 6 Although neither setbacks nor separation between structures are applicable to the clubhouse and other recreation structures located on a clubhouse tract, neither the clubhouse nor any other recreational structure shall be located closer than 25 feet from any residential or preservation boundary. 7- The use of flag lots is allowed to provide maximum flexibility in subdivision design and may vary from the minimum lot widths. However, neither the minimum lot area, nor the minimum distance between structures may be reduced. 8-Zero foot (0')setback for internal units. 9 Inclusive of under building parking 10 Buildings shall not exceed three stories within 1,250 feet of Immokalee Road. 11 5' side yard setbacks shall apply to lots equal to or less€i' than 70' in width. Lots greater than 70' in width will provide 6' side yard setbacks. 12 Maximum length of buildings shall not exceed 300 linear feet. BH= Building Height SPS = Same as Principal Structure Notwithstanding the foregoing;none of the footnotes shall operate as a deviation from the Land Development Code unless they are listed as deviations on Exhibit E.None of the footnotes operate as deviations from the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 6 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 rl( 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) J E y BUILDING FOOTPRINT 4. h Qa I i w I . I Ktca I FLAG LOT W Ji Et I I I 4111P — _ ......7)\ FU18 LOT I r I I FLaslot I L DENOTES LOT LINE NOTE: THIS EXHIBIT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES TO SHOW NOW CERTAIN GEOMETRY OF A GIVEN TRACT WOULD FACILITATE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A'FLAG tor DESIGN LAYOUT. 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET PREPARED FOR: PROJECT NAME I.M. COLLIER JOINT VENTURE MIRASOL PUDA GiAGNOLI "lk" Aedro.iuden N...L01661..617,6 4 DRAWING NAME: iagarnBRRARBER& FLAG LOT SCENARIO EXHIBIT'B2' iiiirIj J DRAWN BY; ROPsummunrRUNDAGE,INC. ABB PROJECT No.: 7883 _Professional Engineers,Planners 8c Land Surveyors REVIEWED BY; ROP ACAD FILE NAME: 9814EX8-82CJ4+GnatT•77007*N:owl Tni N.•Narlq R•I.IN 71,4 1!]N if 7.311 I•is.(231)mg.7701 DATE:WOO PAWING FILE No.: N/A SCALE: N,A SH[EL 1 or r PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 7 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 C`.1t 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) SEE SHEET# 2 FOR CONTINUATION NOTE: FOR PLAN LEGEND AND R/G SPECIAL NOTES SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 R/ t R/G N• L R/G TERAFINA R/G ci \ SFMDR/G W PRESERVE CONCEPTUAL CLU°HOUSE COMPLEX LOCATIO R/G ) NERITACE ISR/G R/G PD°) M4 ENTRY I / S{CHACE ki PRIVATE SPINE S RIG OA —» ROAD 1'mi! 2O TYPE'I)LB.E. R/G i' ADO PROPOSED C.R.9S1 EXT. R.O.W.DEDICATION 0 13'TYPE 'MAINTENANCE FACILITY V B LB.E. IA) TREE FARM INCLE-FAMILY (PUP) PRIVATE SPINE IftilROAD OPERTY' /' SOUNDARY OLDS CYPRESS R/G POD) Tim.R/ G WALDROP qo o ENGINEERING• PROPERTY G 1117 BOUNDARY armWIT*W OE9w[•aureass n sewsr*n F sswsnaeo<, UWu rr.r..ir4...I.a. r- vLon C knpn To AL1846s1njM96 ii PosaIBLE ESPLANADE GOLF• FUTURE• IL R/G INTERCONNECT AND COUNTRY 6 s FUTURE CLUB OF NAPLES ACTIVITY 7 m. CENTER I' AI. . , , . . CONCEPTUAL14100Miles.. . TYPE MASTER PLAN 1 IMNOlI ROADIC.R.i461•— r r i w r• --- — 2.23 EXHIBIT"C2" t LB.E. SICTAU iOE 2 22 SHEET 1 OF 3 TYP.) FILENAME 27600EA602.dwg UPDATED:2014-03-06 PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 8 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 i\`1i' 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 2 21110N LEE COUNTY 1 1 A) VACANT OUT PARCEL OWNER: PROPERTY YOUNDARY PARKLANDS PUD) A) VACANT A) VACANT 9 0 i f0 1 RI a\ - • • • - • • • • 1 AiTERAFINA POD) WALDROP ENGINEERING awLEi7mm Owemwo ocronnxFxr 7n.7nnma3 maim WPM GRAMM oM'Z-WM 303 SEE SHEET# 1 FOR CONTINUATION 064717 `FL""°74 3314067777 F 3014067000 MID 10161106161160110206013.. NOTE: FOR PLAN LEGEND AND SPECIAL NOTES SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT"CT' 1 SHEET 2 OF 3 FILE NAME:27600E0602.dwg UPDATED:2014-03-06 PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 9 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) L CONCEPTUAL LAKE LOCATIONS R/G RESIDENTIAL/GOLF PRESERVE RIGHT-OF-WAY r LAND USE AREAS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO RELOCATION/IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LDC. SPECIAL NOTES: 1) WHERE APPLICABLE ALONG PROJECT BOUNDARY AND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PRESERVE AREAS SHALL SERVE AS BUFFERS. IF AFTER EXOTIC REMOVAL THE PRESERVE VEGETATION FAILS TO MEET MINIMUM CODE BUFFER STANDARDS ADDITIONAL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REQUIRED. NATIVE HABITAT SUMMARY: EXISTING NATIVE HABITAT= 903.8 Ac. ± REQUIRED NATIVE HABITAT = 542.3 Ac. t PROVIDED NATIVE HABITAT (ON SITE) = 542.3 Ac. - ACREAGE SUMMARY: SECTION 22 = 445.5 Ae. ± SECTION 15 = 634.6 Ae. ± SECTION 10 = 578.2 Ae. -!- TOTAL= 1,658.3 Ac. ± TOTAL AREA OUTSIDE DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY= 928.8 Ac. ± WALDROPTOTALAREAWITHINDEVELOPMENTBOUNDARY= 729.5 Ac. -F ENGINEERING F1RL FINNFHIMO Y INTO OELEIOFRENE 00NOULUM11 MOO OOM"A SNORE OISIE•011E SOS MOM WORM 8.74710 R Si4OS•77T7 R 2384067INO ROUE,Istoihoddwoosilussiolow naFaw CsmCAm 0I NSIHfRC.A200M ORE ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT"CT' SHEET 3 OF 3 FILE NAME:27600E0602.dwg UPDATED:2014-03-06 PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 10 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT D FOR MIL ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUT , !.• ` - - . - • . , e - - ! ! . ` , FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING FOUR(4) P°'nLS 1) THE SOUTH '/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 14, 1 ! - - - ! - - • 1 a - - - ! - - • 1 3) THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, l)THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 AND e - . - ! • , ! 1` . - ' 8 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE-NORTHEASTE 'HEAST 1/4, 1 • - - - ! - - 1 ! - - - • ! - - • 1 THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 'A, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/z OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, I a _ a _ _ 1 a - - ! - - • 1 THE WEST 3/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 11 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) AND THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTE' e - - - • el - • -- ' - • ' - ' e - SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP '18 SOUTH, RANGE 26 E• - , ! -- - AND THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF e - - - ! ' - ' e _ - - - • - - • - e _ - - SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP : _e _ -, '_• • _ - : - • - FLORIDA, AND EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST L • L •L _ L • L .I. - : L - I • . _ _ • - L _ ' * I.• FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF CONTAINING 1638 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) PARCELS: 1) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, 2) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 3) THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 4) THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 AND ALL OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 12 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) AND ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 3/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 13 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) AND EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS ACCESS EASEMENT FOR HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. CONTAINING 1658.3 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 14 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT E FOR MIRASAh-ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD DEVIATIONS 1. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.0, which requires cul-de-sacs and local streets to have a minimum sixty (60') right-of-way width and two (2) ten foot (10') wide travel lanes, to allow a minimum right-of-way width of 40' for private local streets and 50' for private spine roads. 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J. Street System Requirements, to allow cul- de-sacs in excess of 1,000' in length. For any cul-de-sac exceeding 1,600 feet in length, the roadway must include at approximately 1,600 feet intervals design features which provide for the ability of emergency vehicles to turn around. Traffic roundabouts, eyebrows, hammerheads or similar design features shall be allowed. 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.Q. Street System Requirements, which requires that street name markers shall be approved by the County Manager or designee for private streets or in conformance with U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. This requirement shall be waived. However, breakaway posts shall be used. 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.R. Street Requirements, which requires that street pavement painting, striping and reflective edging of public roadway markings shall be provided by the developer as required by the U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. This requirement shall be waived for private roadways. Traffic circulation signage shall be in conformance with U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device standards. 5. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.H, which requires 1 parking space per 200 square feet of office/lobby/pro shop/health club/ clubhouse/lounge/snack bar/dining/meeting room associated with golf courses. The requested deviation is to allow for 3 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of office/lobby/pro shop/health club/clubhouse/lounge/snack bar/dining/meeting room associated with the proposed golf course. Parking spaces for golf course holes, exterior recreation uses, and maintenance buildings will be provided per the LDC. 6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.04.A, which limits the developer to 100 acres of residential, commercial, or industrial lots or building sites to store excess fill generated by lake excavations within the PUD. The requested deviation is to allow the developer to clear up to 300 acres of residential, commercial, or industrial lots or building sites to store excess fill generated by lake excavations within the PUD or project where the excavation is taking place. This is not a deviation from the Collier County Excavation Ordinance. 7. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum wall height of 8' throughout the development. Where abutting an existing or future public roadway, a 20' tall wall, berm, or combination wall/berm is permitted. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 15 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 8. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5, which permits a maximum of five (5) model homes, or a number corresponding to ten (10) percent of the total number of platted lots, whichever is less, per platted approved development prior to final plat approval. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of six (6) model homes per development tract, not to exceed forty (40) model homes within the overall RPUD. As part of the application material for every building permit for a model home, the developer shall provide documentation stating how many model homes are in existence so that the maximum of forty (40) model homes is not exceeded. 9. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height. The requested deviation is to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height. The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 28 days per calendar year. 10. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.2, which permits one (1) real estate pole sign per street frontage that is setback a minimum of 10' from any property line. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of two (2) real estate pole signs per street frontage setback a minimum of 5' from the property line along Immokalee Road only. 11. Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, which requires on-premise directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from internal property lines. The requested deviation is to allow for on-premise direction signage to be setback a minimum of 5' from internal property lines. This deviation does not apply to property adjacent to public roadways. 12. Deviation #12 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development with a maximum height of 8' and total sign area of 64 s.f. per sign. The requested deviation is to allow for two (2) ground signs per project entrance with a maximum height of 10' and total sign area of 80 s.f. per sign. 13. Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development. The requested deviation is to allow for one (1) ground sign at the property corners fronting on existing and proposed public roadways that provide access to the project, in addition to two (2) ground signs at each project entrance. The proposed ground signs at property corners, commonly referred to as "boundary markers", will be permitted at a maximum height of 10' and sign area of 32 s.f. per sign. 14. Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A, which requires sidewalks on both sides of roadways internal to the site. The requested deviation is to allow for an 8' wide sidewalk on one side of the private spine road as shown on the PUD master plan, and 5' wide sidewalks on one side of all other private, local roadways internal to the development that service residential units on one (1) side of the roadway, and/or terminate in a cul-de-sac up to a maximum length of 2,500 l.f. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 16 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 15. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 10.02.04.0 which limits the developer to one (1) Site Development Plan submittal for concurrent review with the final plat at such time as the applicant submits the response to the first staff review comments. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of three (3) Site Development Plan submittals for concurrent review with the final plat at such time as the applicant submits the response to the staff review comments. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 17 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT F FOR MHZASOL ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Regulations for development of the Mosel Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order in which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. A. RPUD MASTER PLAN 1. Exhibit "C2", the RPUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries, shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as platting or site development plan application. Subject to the provisions of Section 10.02.13 of the LDC, RPUD amendments may be made from time to time. B. TRANSPORTATION 1. Upon the County's adoption of a CR-951 extension corridor alignment, and within 180 days of the County's request, the Owner, its successors or assigns, shall dedicate to County fee simple right-of-way for the roadway and drainage system at the agreed upon appraised value per acre, for those areas located outside the limits of the residential/Golf Course areas depicted as "R/G" on the PUD master plan. Until such time that the right-of-way is dedicated to the County, the Owner may utilize the land for temporary uses during construction as set forth in LDC §5.04.03. Upon recordation of the deed or other conveyance instrument in the public records of Collier County for the dedication of the right-of-way, the Developer shall become eligible for Transportation Impact fee credits in accordance with the consolidated impact fee Ordinance in effect at the time of recordation of the dedication. If the project is built out or has prepaid transportation Impact Fees to be assessed for the project, then the Developer or its successors or assigns shall be eligible to request cash reimbursement. The Developer shall not be responsible to obtain or modify any permits on behalf of the County related to the extension of CR-951. 2. The Developer shall construct a 10' multi-use pathway to be located along the Immokalee Road right-of-way on the North side of the Cocohatchee Canal as a part of the entrance construction. Completion of construction of the pathway shall be completed concurrently with the vehicular connection to the existing bridge over the Cocohatchee Canal. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 18 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 3, 2007, the Developer was responsible for a total financial commitment of 3,229,588.00; and upon satisfaction, Mirasol would be vested for transportation by funding improvements to the Immokalee Road Collier Boulevard intersection, which r. 1 4 1• financial obligations and project vesting was issued by Collier County on April 23, 2009. 4.3. a. Proportionate Share Payment The Developer, its successors, or assigns, agree that at the time of issuance of a building permit for the 400th residential dwelling unit authorized by this PUD, or commencement of construction of the intersection improvements, the Developer, or its successors or assigns, shall be responsible for their respective fair share of the North leg of the CR- 951/Broken Back Road intersection with Immokalee Road based on 1,233 units, which includes modification, replacement, or relocation of the at-grade bridge crossing the Cocohatchee Canal. b. Timing Restriction The Developer agrees that no building permits may be sought for the final 112 residential units, or equivalent per 42 Unadjusted Two-Way PM peak hour trips, until such time that adequate roadway and intersection capacity has been constructed for the intersection of CR 951 extension and Immokalee Road, and is available to accommodate these units. However, if adequate roadway and intersection capacity is not available within four (4) years of this PUD amendment approval, and the Developer has prepaid impact fees in full for all 1,233 residential units, building permits may be sought for the final 112 residential units, or equivalent per 42 Unadjusted Two-Way PM peak hour trips. 5.4. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 781 823 Two Way, unadjusted PM Peak hour trips. 6,5. The Developer may use the eastern entrance from Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard as shown on the master plan for "construction-only" traffic upon issuance of a County road right-of-way permit for temporary access. Developer shall be required to install a stabilized road base and provide for dust abatement measures for the construction traffic. 7-6. At the time that Developer applies for a road right-way-permit for a permanent eastern entrance from Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard as shown on the master plan, Developer shall construct at its cost the two northbound lanes of a future four lane road design of Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) from the Quarry's north entrance (alternatively, from its terminus that may be north of the Quarry's entrance as a result of road construction by others for their site specific access needs) to the Mir-asel Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples project's eastern entrance. The roadway shall be constructed in accordance with the design standards including drainage features and sidewalks of a two-lane collector roadway as required by the Collier County LDC and Code of Laws and Ordinances at the time of issuance of the road right of way permit. The Developer will be required to construct only those site access improvements such as turn lanes along Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 19 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) that are specific to the Mirasol Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples project. In the event the County at time of issuance of the road right of way permit requests improvements to Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) that exceed the collector standards of the LDC and Code of Laws and Ordinances, then Developer shall be eligible for impact fee credits for those additional improvements. The County will accept the roadway by Resolution for ownership and maintenance one (1) year after acceptance of the construction of the roadway. The Developer shall not be required as part of this PUD to provide for offsite treatment and storage of stormwater for Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) outside of the County's road right of way. The stormwater is planned to be conveyed to the Quarry for storage/treatment or to another off-site location as directed by Collier County. C. ENVIRONMENTAL The project shall retain a minimum of 537/1 542.3 acres of native vegetation on-site in compliance with the Growth Management Plan. Easements or ROW created for access to outparcels within the preserve or for future extension of the CR-951 corridor shall not cause the preserve to fall below the minimum native vegetation retention requirement. D. EXCAVATION Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a commercial or development excavation pursuant to Section 22-106 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County Florida. The entire water management pass-thru will be constructed at one time as per South Florida Water Management permit #11-02031-P, as amended, prior to the residential development under an administratively issued "development" excavation permit as long as no more than 20,000 c.y. of material is removed off-site. As per Section 22-106 of Code of Laws and Ordinances, a commercial excavation permit will be required for removing more than the approved 20,000 c.y. of material off-site. E. OUTPARCEL IN SECTION 10 A temporary access easement shall be granted by the Owner to the owner of parcel number of 00178760007, at a location specified by IM Collier Joint Venture it's successors and assigns. At such time that the northern portion of the Mirasol Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples RPUD has access to a public road, the developer shall provide reasonable access from the parcel number 00178760007 across the Mirasol Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples RPUD to the public road. Both the temporary and permanent easements shall be granted to the owner of this parcel, at no cost to the County or the owner of this outparcel. F. UTILITIES 1. The developer shall connect to the Collier County Water Sewer District (CCWSD) potable water system at a locations determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2. The developer shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a locations determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 3. The developer shall connect to the CCWSD Irrigation Quality water system at a locations to be determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 20 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) G. PLANNING 1. The developer shall complete construction of the golf course and temporary golf pro shop/locker room prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the 100th dwelling unit. The developer shall complete construction of the permanent golf pro shop/locker room prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the- 500t dwelling unit 50% of the approved units, or 616 units. 2. The 112 dwelling units added to the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD through this PUD amendment approval dated nu-,t-: i`/ 2014 must be developed within the 19.7-acre parcel to the east of private spine road in Section 22 Parcel No. 00187360003). H. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD amendment approval dated O c.t . l Li 2014, the Managing Entity is Taylor Morrison theNaples, LLC. he Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 21 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised:September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) tttr viix I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OfSTATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State October 20, 2014 Honorable Dwight E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples, Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Teresa L. Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Dear Mr. Brock: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 14-36, which was filed in this office on October 20, 2014. Sincerely, Ernest L. Reddick Program Administrator ELR/Ib R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 • Facsimile: (850) 488-9879 www.dos.state.fl.us 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20180002020 – Esplanade Golf & Country Club (PUDR) - PRE-APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke Camden Smith,(Ops Staff) • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Alexis Crespo, AICP 239-405-7777 Alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com • Agent to list for PL# Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Alexis Crespo, AICP • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Dawn Hatcher - Parcel No 00190040200 Maxine Hatcher - Parcel No 00187520005 • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) PUD Rezone to include 10-acres of Agriculturally-zoned lands into existing Esplanade Naples Golf & Country Club RPUD • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): RPUD is currently permitted for 1,233 dwelling units. The Applicant is not proposing to change the allowable density via this amendment request. • Details about Project (choose type that applies): N/A REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Lindsay Robin Title: Project Planner Email: Lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com Phone: 239-405-7777 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 43,000 $ 276,250 $ 104,454 $ 380,704 $ 121,188 $ 132,875 $ 126,641 $ 25,000 $ 101,641 $ 25,000 $ 76,641 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No 00187520005 Site Address 4190 BROKEN BACK RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34119 Name / Address HATCHER, MAXINE I 4190 BROKEN BACK RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34119-9705 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres  *Estimated 3B22 000100 014 3B22 22 48 26 5 Legal 22 48 26 S1/2 OF N1/2 OF W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE 1/4 Millage Area 222 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 69 - ORNAMENTALS, MISC AGRICULTURAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 02/01/85 1123-3 09/01/83 1041-1620 08/01/78 766-1796 03/01/78 740-1136 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) Save our Home (-) Agriculture (=) Assessed Value (-) Homestead (=) School Taxable Value (-) Additional Homestead (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 6/25/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=94094176&ccpaver=1710181149&Fol... 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) $ 0 $ 276,250 $ 148,903 $ 425,153 $ 425,153 $ 425,153 $ 425,153 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No 00190040200 Site Address 4200 BROKEN BACK RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34119 Name / Address HATCHER, DAWN L P O BOX 111646 City NAPLES State FL Zip 34110 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres  *Estimated 3B22 000100 067 3B22 22 48 26 5 Legal 22 48 26 N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 5 AC OR 1526 PG 243 Millage Area 222 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 5.122 5.8384 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 05/01/90 1526-243 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 6/25/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=94094400&ccpaver=1710181149&Fol... 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No 00187520005 Site Address 4190 BROKEN BACK RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34119 Name / Address HATCHER, MAXINE I 4190 BROKEN BACK RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34119-9705 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1983 COUNTY 81-5432 08/08/83 RESIDENCE Land  # Calc Code Units 10 ACREAGE 3.15 20 1.85 Building/Extra Features  # Year Built Description Area Adj Area 10 1983 RESIDENTIAL 1024 1483 Page 1 of 1 6/25/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=94094176&ccpaver=1710181149&Fol... 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No 00190040200 Site Address 4200 BROKEN BACK RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34119 Name / Address HATCHER, DAWN L P O BOX 111646 City NAPLES State FL Zip 34110 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1990 COUNTY 90-3257 RESIDENCE 1994 COUNTY 94-4356 ADDITION 2000 COUNTY 0010-1349 ADDITION Land  # Calc Code Units 10 ACREAGE 5 Building/Extra Features  # Year Built Description Area Adj Area 10 1990 RESIDENTIAL 1517 2290 20 2001 GARAGE 702 714 30 2001 W DECK 382 382 40 2001 CONCRETE 527 527 Page 1 of 1 6/25/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=94094400&ccpaver=1710181149&Fol... 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No 00187520005 Site Address 4190 BROKEN BACK RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34119 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 6/25/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=94094176&ccpaver=1710181149&Fol... 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No 00190040200 Site Address 4200 BROKEN BACK RD Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34119 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Page 1 of 1 6/25/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=94094400&ccpaver=1710181149&Fol... 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Collier County Property Appraiser Page 1 of 1 6/25/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Docviewer.html?sid=94094176&ccpaver=1... 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Collier County Property Appraiser Page 1 of 1 6/25/2018http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Docviewer.html?sid=94094400&ccpaver=1... 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 316Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & ORDINANCE NO. 14- 36 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2009-21, THE MIRASOL RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AS AMENDED, BY INCREASING THE PERMISSIBLE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS FROM 1,121 TO 1,233; BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 19.7± ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) TO THE MIRASOL RPUD; BY CHANGING THE NAME OF THE RPUD FROM THE MIRASOL RPUD TO THE ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD; BY INCREASING THE DWELLING UNITS FROM 1,121 TO 1,233; BY REVISING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN AND REVISING DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR 846) BORDERED ON THE EAST BY FUTURE COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) IN SECTIONS 10, 15 AND 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 1,658.3± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PETITION PUDZA-PL20140000099] WHEREAS, TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC, represented by Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and Alexis Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the RPUD and change the zoning classification of the additional herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. The zoning classification of approximately 19.7 acres of the herein described real property located in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development RPUD) zoning district together with the existing Mirasol RPUD for a 1,658.3± acre project to be now known as the Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples RPUD in accordance with the revised Exhibits A-F, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. 14-CPS-01303/1117850/1184 Mirasol PUDZA\PUDZA-PL20140000099 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 9/18/14 CPO 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) SECTION TWO: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this /y f`_ day of C f h-Ur 2014. ATTEST:E ''" 14' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BI .C7C1(..CLERK COLLIER C T , FLORIDA By jolt. • 4- D uty G1;erk- TOM HE ING, U- .irman Attest as,tg L'iai iiar S signature on7 Approved as to form and legality: e A«i,IT C)L 1iy H di Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development Standards Exhibit B2 - Flag Lot Scenario Exhibit C2 - Master Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - Deviations Exhibit F - Developer Commitments 14-CPS-01303/1117850/1]84 Mirasol PUDZA\PUDZA-PL20140000099 Page 2 of 2 Rev. 9/18/14 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT A FOR MIRASOL ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 1,121 1,233 residential units and a maximum of 18 golf course holes may be developed within the RPUD. I. Residential/Golf Tracts (RG): A. Principal Uses: 1. Single-family detached dwelling units. 2. Zero lot line dwelling units. 3. Townhouse dwellings. 4. Two-family and duplex dwellings. 5. Multiple-family dwellings. 6. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner determines to be compatible in the "RG" district. B. Accessory Uses/Structures: 1. Uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted 2. Guest houses. 3. Common area recreation facilities for residents and their guests. 4. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters. 5. Model homes, model home sales centers, and sales trailers, including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, as well as resale and rental of units. 6. Golf course, practice areas and ranges, golf cart barns, rest rooms, shelters snack bars and golf course maintenance yards for residents and their guests. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 1 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 S 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 7. Golf Club Complex as located on the Master Plan: i) Retail establishments accessory to the permitted uses in the District such as, but not limited to, golf, tennis and recreation related sales for residents and their guests. ii) Restaurants, cocktail lounges, and similar uses for residents and their guests. iii) Pro-shops, golf club, tennis clubs, and health spas for residents and their guests. iv) Golf course, practice areas and ranges, golf cart barns, rest rooms, shelters snack bars and golf course maintenance yards and facilities. 8. Shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools, and other types of accessory facilities intended for outdoor recreation for residents and their guests. 9. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. 10. Essential services, pursuant to the LDC. 11. Water management facilities and related structures. 12. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or architectural or structural bank treatments. 13. Parks, recreational facilities, community centers for residents and their guests. 14. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the developer, builders, and their authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 15. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffer berms, fences and walls. 16. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner determines to be compatible in the "RG" district. II. Conservation/Preserve Tract: A. Principal Uses: 1. Passive recreation uses limited to the following so long as clearing for such uses does not result in the reduction of preserve acreage below the minimum requirement: PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 2 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) i. Boardwalks ii. Environmental uses (wetland and conservation areas) iii.Pedestrian bridges iv.Pervious nature trails except where American Disabilities Act requires otherwise. v. Native Wildlife sanctuary vi.Inclement weather shelters, in preserve upland areas only unless constructed as part of a permitted boardwalk system. The shelters shall be a maximum of 150 square feet each. 2. Environmental research 3. Drainage and water management facilities subject to all required permits. 4. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list or permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner through the process outlined in the LDC. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 3 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT B FOR MIRASOL ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan(SDP) or subdivision plat. TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RG" RESIDENTIAL AREAS Multi- Clubhouse/ PERMITTED Single Zero Two Family Townhouse Family Recreation USES Family Lot and Duplex 12 Dwelling Buildings AND Detached Line 12 6 STANDARDS Principal Structures Minimum Lot 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per 2,000 SF 9,000 SF n/a Area lot or unit 3 Minimum Lot 50' *7 40' *7 35'per lot 20'90' n/a Width*4 or unit*7 Front Yard 20' *2*7 20' *2*7 20' *2 *7 20' *2 20' *2 25' Setback 2* Side Yard 5' 0 or 10'7.5'17*8 7.5' *8 10'or 1/2 5' Setback*2 11 BH for structures exceeding 35 feet*5 Rear Yard 15'*7 10' 15'*7 10' 15'*7 10' -1 10' 45'10' 0' Setback*1 Setback From 10'*7 10'17 10' 10'10' 20' Golf Course Setbacks from 25' 25' 25' 25'25' 25' Preserves Maximum 35' 35' 35' 35'50'(5 stories 50'(2 stories Zoned Height not to ever-par-king-net 10 exceed 50') to exceed 50') 9 Actual Height 45' 45' 45' 45'65' 75' 10 Floor Area Min.Per Unit(S.F.) 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 750 SF n/a Distance 10' 10' 10' 10'20'or '/2 15'or.5 BH Between SUM of BH whichever is Principal for greater*6 Structures structures exceeding 35' *5 PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 4 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Single Zero Two Family Townhouse Multi- Clubhouse/ Family Lot and Duplex Family Recreation Accessory Detached Line Dwelling Buildings Structures 6 Front Yard SPS*7 SPS*7 SPS SPS SPS SPS Setback*2 Side Yard 5'17 0 or 10'5' 5' 10'or 1/2 5' Setback BH for structures exceeding 35 feet*5 Rear Yard 5'/7 5' 5' 5' 10' 5' Accessory Setback 1 Setback From 10' 10' 10' 10'10' 10' Preserves Distance O'or 10' O'or 10' O'or 10'O'or 10' O'or 10'O' or 10' Between Accessory Structures on the same lot Distance 0'or 5'0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' Between Accessory and Principal Structures on same lot Maximum SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' 35' Zoned Height 10 Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 45' 45' 10 Front yards for all uses shall be measured as follows: If the parcel is served by a public road right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). 1 - Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lakes and open spaces. Setbacks from lakes for all principal and accessory uses may be 0 feet provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from the Collier County Engineering Review Section. 2 - Single-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and provide for guest parking other than in private driveways may reduce the front yard requirement to 10 feet for a side entry garage. Multi-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and provide for guest parking may reduce the front yard to 15 feet. This reduction shall not result in an approval to impede or block the sidewalk. Front loaded garages shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk. 3 - Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 square feet for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet. 4—Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. 5- Building distance may be reduced at garages to half the sum of the height of the garages. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 5 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 C`1 O} 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 6 Although neither setbacks nor separation between structures are applicable to the clubhouse and other recreation structures located on a clubhouse tract, neither the clubhouse nor any other recreational structure shall be located closer than 25 feet from any residential or preservation boundary. 7- The use of flag lots is allowed to provide maximum flexibility in subdivision design and may vary from the minimum lot widths. However, neither the minimum lot area, nor the minimum distance between structures may be reduced. 8-Zero foot (0')setback for internal units. 9 Inclusive of under building parking 10 Buildings shall not exceed three stories within 1,250 feet of Immokalee Road. 11 5' side yard setbacks shall apply to lots equal to or less€i' than 70' in width. Lots greater than 70' in width will provide 6' side yard setbacks. 12 Maximum length of buildings shall not exceed 300 linear feet. BH= Building Height SPS = Same as Principal Structure Notwithstanding the foregoing;none of the footnotes shall operate as a deviation from the Land Development Code unless they are listed as deviations on Exhibit E.None of the footnotes operate as deviations from the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 6 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 rl( 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) J E y BUILDING FOOTPRINT 4. h Qa I i w I . I Ktca I FLAG LOT W Ji Et I I I 4111P — _ ......7)\ FU18 LOT I r I I FLaslot I L DENOTES LOT LINE NOTE: THIS EXHIBIT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES TO SHOW NOW CERTAIN GEOMETRY OF A GIVEN TRACT WOULD FACILITATE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A'FLAG tor DESIGN LAYOUT. 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET PREPARED FOR: PROJECT NAME I.M. COLLIER JOINT VENTURE MIRASOL PUDA GiAGNOLI "lk" Aedro.iuden N...L01661..617,6 4 DRAWING NAME: iagarnBRRARBER& FLAG LOT SCENARIO EXHIBIT'B2' iiiirIj J DRAWN BY; ROPsummunrRUNDAGE,INC. ABB PROJECT No.: 7883 _Professional Engineers,Planners 8c Land Surveyors REVIEWED BY; ROP ACAD FILE NAME: 9814EX8-82CJ4+GnatT•77007*N:owl Tni N.•Narlq R•I.IN 71,4 1!]N if 7.311 I•is.(231)mg.7701 DATE:WOO PAWING FILE No.: N/A SCALE: N,A SH[EL 1 or r PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 7 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 C`.1t 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) SEE SHEET# 2 FOR CONTINUATION NOTE: FOR PLAN LEGEND AND R/G SPECIAL NOTES SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 R/ t R/G N• L R/G TERAFINA R/G ci \ SFMDR/G W PRESERVE CONCEPTUAL CLU°HOUSE COMPLEX LOCATIO R/G ) NERITACE ISR/G R/G PD°) M4 ENTRY I / S{CHACE ki PRIVATE SPINE S RIG OA —» ROAD 1'mi! 2O TYPE'I)LB.E. R/G i' ADO PROPOSED C.R.9S1 EXT. R.O.W.DEDICATION 0 13'TYPE 'MAINTENANCE FACILITY V B LB.E. IA) TREE FARM INCLE-FAMILY (PUP) PRIVATE SPINE IftilROAD OPERTY' /' SOUNDARY OLDS CYPRESS R/G POD) Tim.R/ G WALDROP qo o ENGINEERING• PROPERTY G 1117 BOUNDARY armWIT*W OE9w[•aureass n sewsr*n F sswsnaeo<, UWu rr.r..ir4...I.a. r- vLon C knpn To AL1846s1njM96 ii PosaIBLE ESPLANADE GOLF• FUTURE• IL R/G INTERCONNECT AND COUNTRY 6 s FUTURE CLUB OF NAPLES ACTIVITY 7 m. CENTER I' AI. . , , . . CONCEPTUAL14100Miles.. . TYPE MASTER PLAN 1 IMNOlI ROADIC.R.i461•— r r i w r• --- — 2.23 EXHIBIT"C2" t LB.E. SICTAU iOE 2 22 SHEET 1 OF 3 TYP.) FILENAME 27600EA602.dwg UPDATED:2014-03-06 PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 8 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 i\`1i' 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 2 21110N LEE COUNTY 1 1 A) VACANT OUT PARCEL OWNER: PROPERTY YOUNDARY PARKLANDS PUD) A) VACANT A) VACANT 9 0 i f0 1 RI a\ - • • • - • • • • 1 AiTERAFINA POD) WALDROP ENGINEERING awLEi7mm Owemwo ocronnxFxr 7n.7nnma3 maim WPM GRAMM oM'Z-WM 303 SEE SHEET# 1 FOR CONTINUATION 064717 `FL""°74 3314067777 F 3014067000 MID 10161106161160110206013.. NOTE: FOR PLAN LEGEND AND SPECIAL NOTES SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT"CT' 1 SHEET 2 OF 3 FILE NAME:27600E0602.dwg UPDATED:2014-03-06 PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 9 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) L CONCEPTUAL LAKE LOCATIONS R/G RESIDENTIAL/GOLF PRESERVE RIGHT-OF-WAY r LAND USE AREAS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO RELOCATION/IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LDC. SPECIAL NOTES: 1) WHERE APPLICABLE ALONG PROJECT BOUNDARY AND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PRESERVE AREAS SHALL SERVE AS BUFFERS. IF AFTER EXOTIC REMOVAL THE PRESERVE VEGETATION FAILS TO MEET MINIMUM CODE BUFFER STANDARDS ADDITIONAL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REQUIRED. NATIVE HABITAT SUMMARY: EXISTING NATIVE HABITAT= 903.8 Ac. ± REQUIRED NATIVE HABITAT = 542.3 Ac. t PROVIDED NATIVE HABITAT (ON SITE) = 542.3 Ac. - ACREAGE SUMMARY: SECTION 22 = 445.5 Ae. ± SECTION 15 = 634.6 Ae. ± SECTION 10 = 578.2 Ae. -!- TOTAL= 1,658.3 Ac. ± TOTAL AREA OUTSIDE DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY= 928.8 Ac. ± WALDROPTOTALAREAWITHINDEVELOPMENTBOUNDARY= 729.5 Ac. -F ENGINEERING F1RL FINNFHIMO Y INTO OELEIOFRENE 00NOULUM11 MOO OOM"A SNORE OISIE•011E SOS MOM WORM 8.74710 R Si4OS•77T7 R 2384067INO ROUE,Istoihoddwoosilussiolow naFaw CsmCAm 0I NSIHfRC.A200M ORE ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT"CT' SHEET 3 OF 3 FILE NAME:27600E0602.dwg UPDATED:2014-03-06 PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 10 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT D FOR MIL ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUT , !.• ` - - . - • . , e - - ! ! . ` , FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING FOUR(4) P°'nLS 1) THE SOUTH '/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 14, 1 ! - - - ! - - • 1 a - - - ! - - • 1 3) THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, l)THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 AND e - . - ! • , ! 1` . - ' 8 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE-NORTHEASTE 'HEAST 1/4, 1 • - - - ! - - 1 ! - - - • ! - - • 1 THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 'A, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/z OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, I a _ a _ _ 1 a - - ! - - • 1 THE WEST 3/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 11 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) AND THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTE' e - - - • el - • -- ' - • ' - ' e - SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP '18 SOUTH, RANGE 26 E• - , ! -- - AND THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF e - - - ! ' - ' e _ - - - • - - • - e _ - - SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP : _e _ -, '_• • _ - : - • - FLORIDA, AND EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST L • L •L _ L • L .I. - : L - I • . _ _ • - L _ ' * I.• FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF CONTAINING 1638 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) PARCELS: 1) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, 2) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 3) THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 4) THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 AND ALL OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 12 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) AND ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 3/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 13 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) AND EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS ACCESS EASEMENT FOR HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. CONTAINING 1658.3 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 14 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT E FOR MIRASAh-ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD DEVIATIONS 1. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.0, which requires cul-de-sacs and local streets to have a minimum sixty (60') right-of-way width and two (2) ten foot (10') wide travel lanes, to allow a minimum right-of-way width of 40' for private local streets and 50' for private spine roads. 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J. Street System Requirements, to allow cul- de-sacs in excess of 1,000' in length. For any cul-de-sac exceeding 1,600 feet in length, the roadway must include at approximately 1,600 feet intervals design features which provide for the ability of emergency vehicles to turn around. Traffic roundabouts, eyebrows, hammerheads or similar design features shall be allowed. 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.Q. Street System Requirements, which requires that street name markers shall be approved by the County Manager or designee for private streets or in conformance with U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. This requirement shall be waived. However, breakaway posts shall be used. 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.R. Street Requirements, which requires that street pavement painting, striping and reflective edging of public roadway markings shall be provided by the developer as required by the U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. This requirement shall be waived for private roadways. Traffic circulation signage shall be in conformance with U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device standards. 5. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.H, which requires 1 parking space per 200 square feet of office/lobby/pro shop/health club/ clubhouse/lounge/snack bar/dining/meeting room associated with golf courses. The requested deviation is to allow for 3 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of office/lobby/pro shop/health club/clubhouse/lounge/snack bar/dining/meeting room associated with the proposed golf course. Parking spaces for golf course holes, exterior recreation uses, and maintenance buildings will be provided per the LDC. 6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.04.A, which limits the developer to 100 acres of residential, commercial, or industrial lots or building sites to store excess fill generated by lake excavations within the PUD. The requested deviation is to allow the developer to clear up to 300 acres of residential, commercial, or industrial lots or building sites to store excess fill generated by lake excavations within the PUD or project where the excavation is taking place. This is not a deviation from the Collier County Excavation Ordinance. 7. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum wall height of 8' throughout the development. Where abutting an existing or future public roadway, a 20' tall wall, berm, or combination wall/berm is permitted. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 15 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 8. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5, which permits a maximum of five (5) model homes, or a number corresponding to ten (10) percent of the total number of platted lots, whichever is less, per platted approved development prior to final plat approval. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of six (6) model homes per development tract, not to exceed forty (40) model homes within the overall RPUD. As part of the application material for every building permit for a model home, the developer shall provide documentation stating how many model homes are in existence so that the maximum of forty (40) model homes is not exceeded. 9. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height. The requested deviation is to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height. The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 28 days per calendar year. 10. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.2, which permits one (1) real estate pole sign per street frontage that is setback a minimum of 10' from any property line. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of two (2) real estate pole signs per street frontage setback a minimum of 5' from the property line along Immokalee Road only. 11. Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, which requires on-premise directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from internal property lines. The requested deviation is to allow for on-premise direction signage to be setback a minimum of 5' from internal property lines. This deviation does not apply to property adjacent to public roadways. 12. Deviation #12 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development with a maximum height of 8' and total sign area of 64 s.f. per sign. The requested deviation is to allow for two (2) ground signs per project entrance with a maximum height of 10' and total sign area of 80 s.f. per sign. 13. Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development. The requested deviation is to allow for one (1) ground sign at the property corners fronting on existing and proposed public roadways that provide access to the project, in addition to two (2) ground signs at each project entrance. The proposed ground signs at property corners, commonly referred to as "boundary markers", will be permitted at a maximum height of 10' and sign area of 32 s.f. per sign. 14. Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A, which requires sidewalks on both sides of roadways internal to the site. The requested deviation is to allow for an 8' wide sidewalk on one side of the private spine road as shown on the PUD master plan, and 5' wide sidewalks on one side of all other private, local roadways internal to the development that service residential units on one (1) side of the roadway, and/or terminate in a cul-de-sac up to a maximum length of 2,500 l.f. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 16 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 15. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 10.02.04.0 which limits the developer to one (1) Site Development Plan submittal for concurrent review with the final plat at such time as the applicant submits the response to the first staff review comments. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of three (3) Site Development Plan submittals for concurrent review with the final plat at such time as the applicant submits the response to the staff review comments. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 17 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT F FOR MHZASOL ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Regulations for development of the Mosel Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order in which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. A. RPUD MASTER PLAN 1. Exhibit "C2", the RPUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries, shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as platting or site development plan application. Subject to the provisions of Section 10.02.13 of the LDC, RPUD amendments may be made from time to time. B. TRANSPORTATION 1. Upon the County's adoption of a CR-951 extension corridor alignment, and within 180 days of the County's request, the Owner, its successors or assigns, shall dedicate to County fee simple right-of-way for the roadway and drainage system at the agreed upon appraised value per acre, for those areas located outside the limits of the residential/Golf Course areas depicted as "R/G" on the PUD master plan. Until such time that the right-of-way is dedicated to the County, the Owner may utilize the land for temporary uses during construction as set forth in LDC §5.04.03. Upon recordation of the deed or other conveyance instrument in the public records of Collier County for the dedication of the right-of-way, the Developer shall become eligible for Transportation Impact fee credits in accordance with the consolidated impact fee Ordinance in effect at the time of recordation of the dedication. If the project is built out or has prepaid transportation Impact Fees to be assessed for the project, then the Developer or its successors or assigns shall be eligible to request cash reimbursement. The Developer shall not be responsible to obtain or modify any permits on behalf of the County related to the extension of CR-951. 2. The Developer shall construct a 10' multi-use pathway to be located along the Immokalee Road right-of-way on the North side of the Cocohatchee Canal as a part of the entrance construction. Completion of construction of the pathway shall be completed concurrently with the vehicular connection to the existing bridge over the Cocohatchee Canal. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 18 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 3, 2007, the Developer was responsible for a total financial commitment of 3,229,588.00; and upon satisfaction, Mirasol would be vested for transportation by funding improvements to the Immokalee Road Collier Boulevard intersection, which r. 1 4 1• financial obligations and project vesting was issued by Collier County on April 23, 2009. 4.3. a. Proportionate Share Payment The Developer, its successors, or assigns, agree that at the time of issuance of a building permit for the 400th residential dwelling unit authorized by this PUD, or commencement of construction of the intersection improvements, the Developer, or its successors or assigns, shall be responsible for their respective fair share of the North leg of the CR- 951/Broken Back Road intersection with Immokalee Road based on 1,233 units, which includes modification, replacement, or relocation of the at-grade bridge crossing the Cocohatchee Canal. b. Timing Restriction The Developer agrees that no building permits may be sought for the final 112 residential units, or equivalent per 42 Unadjusted Two-Way PM peak hour trips, until such time that adequate roadway and intersection capacity has been constructed for the intersection of CR 951 extension and Immokalee Road, and is available to accommodate these units. However, if adequate roadway and intersection capacity is not available within four (4) years of this PUD amendment approval, and the Developer has prepaid impact fees in full for all 1,233 residential units, building permits may be sought for the final 112 residential units, or equivalent per 42 Unadjusted Two-Way PM peak hour trips. 5.4. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 781 823 Two Way, unadjusted PM Peak hour trips. 6,5. The Developer may use the eastern entrance from Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard as shown on the master plan for "construction-only" traffic upon issuance of a County road right-of-way permit for temporary access. Developer shall be required to install a stabilized road base and provide for dust abatement measures for the construction traffic. 7-6. At the time that Developer applies for a road right-way-permit for a permanent eastern entrance from Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard as shown on the master plan, Developer shall construct at its cost the two northbound lanes of a future four lane road design of Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) from the Quarry's north entrance (alternatively, from its terminus that may be north of the Quarry's entrance as a result of road construction by others for their site specific access needs) to the Mir-asel Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples project's eastern entrance. The roadway shall be constructed in accordance with the design standards including drainage features and sidewalks of a two-lane collector roadway as required by the Collier County LDC and Code of Laws and Ordinances at the time of issuance of the road right of way permit. The Developer will be required to construct only those site access improvements such as turn lanes along Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 19 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) that are specific to the Mirasol Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples project. In the event the County at time of issuance of the road right of way permit requests improvements to Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) that exceed the collector standards of the LDC and Code of Laws and Ordinances, then Developer shall be eligible for impact fee credits for those additional improvements. The County will accept the roadway by Resolution for ownership and maintenance one (1) year after acceptance of the construction of the roadway. The Developer shall not be required as part of this PUD to provide for offsite treatment and storage of stormwater for Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) outside of the County's road right of way. The stormwater is planned to be conveyed to the Quarry for storage/treatment or to another off-site location as directed by Collier County. C. ENVIRONMENTAL The project shall retain a minimum of 537/1 542.3 acres of native vegetation on-site in compliance with the Growth Management Plan. Easements or ROW created for access to outparcels within the preserve or for future extension of the CR-951 corridor shall not cause the preserve to fall below the minimum native vegetation retention requirement. D. EXCAVATION Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a commercial or development excavation pursuant to Section 22-106 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County Florida. The entire water management pass-thru will be constructed at one time as per South Florida Water Management permit #11-02031-P, as amended, prior to the residential development under an administratively issued "development" excavation permit as long as no more than 20,000 c.y. of material is removed off-site. As per Section 22-106 of Code of Laws and Ordinances, a commercial excavation permit will be required for removing more than the approved 20,000 c.y. of material off-site. E. OUTPARCEL IN SECTION 10 A temporary access easement shall be granted by the Owner to the owner of parcel number of 00178760007, at a location specified by IM Collier Joint Venture it's successors and assigns. At such time that the northern portion of the Mirasol Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples RPUD has access to a public road, the developer shall provide reasonable access from the parcel number 00178760007 across the Mirasol Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples RPUD to the public road. Both the temporary and permanent easements shall be granted to the owner of this parcel, at no cost to the County or the owner of this outparcel. F. UTILITIES 1. The developer shall connect to the Collier County Water Sewer District (CCWSD) potable water system at a locations determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2. The developer shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a locations determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 3. The developer shall connect to the CCWSD Irrigation Quality water system at a locations to be determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 20 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) G. PLANNING 1. The developer shall complete construction of the golf course and temporary golf pro shop/locker room prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the 100th dwelling unit. The developer shall complete construction of the permanent golf pro shop/locker room prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the- 500t dwelling unit 50% of the approved units, or 616 units. 2. The 112 dwelling units added to the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD through this PUD amendment approval dated nu-,t-: i`/ 2014 must be developed within the 19.7-acre parcel to the east of private spine road in Section 22 Parcel No. 00187360003). H. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD amendment approval dated O c.t . l Li 2014, the Managing Entity is Taylor Morrison theNaples, LLC. he Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 21 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised:September 16,2014 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) tttr viix I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OfSTATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State October 20, 2014 Honorable Dwight E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples, Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Teresa L. Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Dear Mr. Brock: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 14-36, which was filed in this office on October 20, 2014. Sincerely, Ernest L. Reddick Program Administrator ELR/Ib R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 • Facsimile: (850) 488-9879 www.dos.state.fl.us 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) ORDINANCE NO.2016- 3 5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2002-09, THE FLOW WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; AMENDING THE DISTRICT BY EXPANDING THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES, INCREASING THE DISTRICT FROM 829.74 ACRES TO 849.40 ACRES, OR 19.66 ADDITIONAL ACRES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on February 26, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopted Ordinance No. 2002-09 establishing the Flow Way Community Development District, as a community development district within the meaning of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the original boundaries set forth in Ordinance No. 2002-09 established boundaries resulting in 829.74 acres,more or less; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the Flow Way Community Development District(Petitioner), has petitioned the Board to annex an additional 19.66 acres as authorized by Section 190.046(1),Florida Statutes,which would result in a total acreage of 849.40 acres; and WHEREAS,the Board considered the Petition at a duly noticed public hearing. WHEREAS,upon consideration of the Petition,the Board determined the following: 1. The statements made within the Petition are true and correct. 2. Amending the Ordinance is not inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state and local comprehensive plan. 3. The land within the District continues to be of sufficient size, to be sufficiently compact, and to be sufficiently contiguous to be developable as a functionally interrelated community. 4. The Amendment will not expand the district greater than 50 percent of the land in the initial district, and in no event greater than 1,000 acres on a cumulative net basis. 5. The District continues to be the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area serviced by the District. 6. The services and facilities of the District will continue to not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of any existing local and regional community development services and facilities. 16-CPS-01594/1287982/1]1 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 7. The area to be served by the District remains amenable to separate special-district governance; and WHEREAS, the Board finds that Petitioner has otherwise satisfied all requirements set forth in Section 190.046, Florida Statutes, and recommends approval of the expansion powers based on the contents of the petition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE NO.2002-09. The original legal description of the District described in Exhibit A, is hereby superseded and replaced by the legal description of the District described in Exhibit B, to reflect the expansion of the District. SECTION TWO: EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT. The external boundaries of the District encompass 849.40 acres of land, more or less, as described in Exhibit B. SECTION THREE: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law,the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion o this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION FOUR: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinance of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION FIVE: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. 116-CPS-01594/1287982/11 2 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,this 1Skh day of I\V(z3krcr„lir°' 2016. ATTEST:,-,-. - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK,-CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By 1` B4.. r Attest as to Chairman.Dpii Cler', II ONNA FIALA, CHAIRMAN signat re only. Appr a vet a. to form and legality: i' 444' k Jeffr':'A4 at ow Coun • i•rney ii This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's Office the 1"day ofivcvi1kL '24"-Y0 and acknowledgement of *vat Mina received this 11411 day of e4eamber- 1 • o Lsy.rroepu;v CI* 16-CPS-01594/1287982/1]3 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF NICEWONDER PROPERTY SOUTH A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 15 AND 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLYDESCRIBEDASFOLLOWS; Beginning at the South Quarter Corner of said Section 22; thence S.89'09'08"W., a distance of 990.31 feet; thenceN.0110'06"W., a distance of 1,332.41 feet; thence N.89'07'39"E., a distance of 328.98 feet; thence N.0112'59"W., adistanceof1.332.56 feet; thence S.89'06'10"W., a distance of 655.72 feet; thence N.01'06'47"W., a distance of1,332.31 feet; thence S.89'04'26"W., a distance of 653.40 feet; thence N.01'00'48"W., a distance of 1,331.97 feet;thence S.89'02'41"W., a distance of 651.08 feet; thence N.00'59'06"W., a distance of 2,662.98 feet; thenceN.00'59'00"W., a distance of 988.18 feet to the point of curve of a non tangent curve to the left, of which theradiuspointliesN.21'31'58"W., a radial distance of 359.00 feet; thence northeasterly along the arc, through acentralangleof29'40'27", a distance of 185.93 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of381.00 feet and a central angle of 18'46'56"; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 124.90 feet to apointofreversecurvetothelefthavingaradiusof312.00 feet and a central angle of 2738'40"; thencenortheasterlyalongthearc, a distance of 150.54 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of1,988.00 feet and a central angle of 03'33'22"; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 123.39 feet to apointofreversecurvetothelefthavingaradiusof412.00 feet and a central angle of 35'06'17"; thence northerlyalongthearc. a distance of 252.43 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet andacentralangleof24'47'52"; thence northerly along the arc, a distance of 81.37 feet; thence N.2310'48"E., adistanceof139.54 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 98.00 feet and a central angle of107'41`02"; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 184.18 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having aradiusof212.00 feet and a central angle of 53'55'06"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 199.50 feet;thence N.76'56'44"E, a distance of 98.12 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 88.00 feet and acentralangleof44'42'20"; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 68.66 feet; thence S.58'20'567..., a distanceof38.87 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 71'41'55"; thenceeasterlyalongthearcadistanceof140.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 225.00feetandacentralangleof28'55'44"; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 113.60 feet to a point ofreversecurvetothelefthavingaradiusof212.00 feet and a central angle of 27'20'10"; thence northeasterly alongthearc, a distance of 101.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 38.00 feet and acentralangleof58'26'43"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 38.76 feet to a point of reverse curve tothelefthavingaradiusof212.00 feet and a central angle of 3215'37"; thence easterly along the arc, a distanceof119.37 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of23'02'51"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 75.62 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having aradiusof212.00 feet and a central angle of 46'44'53"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 172.97 feet toapointofreversecurvetotherighthavingaradiusof188.00 feet and a central angle of 2819'29"; thenceeasterlyalongthearc, a distance of 92.94 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00feetandacentralangleof30'42`52"; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 113.65 feet; thenceN.51'38'22"E., a distance of 75.67 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a centralangleof56'37'01"; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 185.77 feet; thence S.71'44'38"E., a distance of215.48 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 15'36'30"; thenceeasterlyalongthearcadistanceof84.99 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 138.00feetandacentralangleof3018'09"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 72.99 feet to a point of reversecurvetothelefthavingaradiusof162.00 feet and a central angle of 38'42'28"; thence easterly along the arc, adistanceof109.44 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet and a central angleof34'16'32"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 82.55 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left havingaradiusof162.00 feet and a central angle of 32'18'53"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 91.37 feet;thence N.8612'12"E., a distance of 80.88 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR CONTINUATION) GENERAL NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. NOT A SURVEY2. R.O.W. = RIGHT-OF-WAY. 3. CURVE DIMENSIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: a BARBER& DELTA, R = RADIUS, A = ARC, CH = CHORD, Ns1" AND CHB = CHORD BEARING C... RUNDAGE,INC. Professional Engineers,Planners be Land Surveyors CAW fes.UU iwr Tea N.•N.,I.,.IL-HIO,.I%a.,.1TJl ll-imM11/H-2,0tt C. Cwu.• 141 ....., N. t.nJ1 .,.UroM•4 MO)J1TJ[il•Fany113J tITJ4. BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED BASED ON THE SOUTH UNE OF THE 7ZNe,.r5v4, eFsxN SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, Foe. J.D.NICEWONDER BEING N 8910'34" E. TITLE METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 5. TOTAL AREA = 829.74 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, Located In Portions of SECTIONS 22 615,T 18 5,R 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY,FL. DRAWN 8Y: ROP ABB PROJECT No: Tim CHECKED BY: GPA ACAD FILE NAME: 8074*1802 DATE: 09/19/01 C000 FILE No.: 883 CG0 SCALE: 1' a 1000' SHEET 2 OF 4 EXHIBIT 2 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA TANGENT CHORD BEARING Cl - 359.00 185.93 2910.27 95.10 N5317'491 C2 381.00 124.90 1r48'56' 63.01 S4811'03'W C3 312.00 _ 150.54 , 2738'40" 76.76 N43'4 11'E C4 1988.00 123.39 313'22" 61.71 531'42'32'W CS 412.00 252.43 3510617' 130.32 N15'36'05'E C6 188.00 81.37 2447.52" 41.33 510'46'52V C7 98.00 164.19 10741'02" 134.11 S77'01'19'W CB 212.00 199.50 53.55'06" 107.83 376'05'43"E C9 88.00 68.66 , 4442'20" 36.19 N804Y06"W C10 112.00 140.15 71'41'55' 80.92 N85.48'08'E C11 225.00 . 113.60 26'55'44' 58.04 564'25'01'W C12 212.00 101.15 2720'10' 51.55 N6512'4rE C13 38.00 38.78 58'26'43• 21.26 58048'04'W C14 212.00 119.37 3215'3r 61.31 86'08'24'E C15 168.00 75.82 23'02'51' 38.33 58915131W C16 212.00 172.97 48'4413• 91.63 N77'24127 C17 188.00 . 92.94 28'19'29' 47.44 S6811'29"W C18 , 212.00 113.65 30•42•52' 58.22 N6659'48'E C19 188.00 185.77 5e 7'OY 101.26 57936'52"W C20 312.00 84.99 15'36'30' 42.76 S7932'531 C21 138.00 72.99 3018'09' 37.37 N7212131W C22 162.00 109.44 3847.1r 58.90 5762413'E C23 138.00 82.55 3416'32' 42.55 N783711'1V C24 162.00 91.37 3218'53" 46.93 5773812E C25 138.00 224.07 93'01'46•_ 145.50 N4716'551W C26 312.00 330.36 6040'03", 182.57 531'06'04"E C27 112.00 57.69 29'30'43" 29.50 57611'27"E C2B 308.00 383.12 711611' 220.79 N5518'43'W C29 908.00 484.40 3033'57 248.11 N0423'39'W C30 112.00 134.34 88'43'2 , 76.58 82378'25'E 1C31512.00 333.98 37'2219• 173.18 57631'24'E C32 488.00 155.66 16166'33' 78.50 N861)4'22'W C33 512.00 297.82 3319.39', 153.25 N66'24'05'EC34488.00 178.15 20'5419" 90.08 S6011'45'W C35 212.00 94.41 _ 25'3058 , 48.00 N7753'4r'E C36 588.00 217.08 21-o9'ar 109.79 975'42'53"W C37 103.00 54.98 303597 28.16 _ N7059.54'E CONTINUED FROM SHEET 2 OF 3) and a central angle of 93'01'46"; thence southeasterly along the arc a distance of 224.07 feat to a point of reversecurvetothelefthavingaradiusof312.00 feet and a central angle of 60'40'03"; thence southeasterly along thearc, a distance of 330.36 feet to a point of compound curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and ocentralangleof2910'43"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 57.69 feet to a point of reverse curve totherighthavingaradiusof308.00 feet and a central angle of 7116'11"; thence southeasterly along the arc, adistanceof383.12 feet to a point of compound curve to the right having a radius of 908.00 feet'and a central angle of 30'33'57"; thence southerly along the arc, a distance of 484.39 feet to a point of reverse curve to the lefthavingaradiusof112.00 feet and a central angle of 68'43'29"; thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of134.34 feet; thence 5.57'50'09"E., a distance of 74.98 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of512.00 feet and a central angle of 37'22'29"; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 333.98 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 488.00 feet and a central angle of 1816'33"; thence easterly along thearc, a distance of 155.66 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 512.00 feet and a central angle of 3319'39"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 297.82 feet to a point of reverse curve to the righthavingaradiusof488.00 feet and a central angle of 20'54'59"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 178.15feettoapointofreversecurvetothelefthavingaradiusof212.00 feet and a central angle of 2510'56"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 94.41 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 588.00feetandacentralangleof21'09'09"; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 217.08 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 103.00 feet and a central angle of 30'35'07"; thence easterly along the arc, adistanceof54.98 feet; thence N.55'42'20"E., a distance of 160.49 feet; thence 5.01'43'53"E., a distance of 738.04feet; thence 5.01'41'44"E., a distance of 2,676.29 feet; thence 5.01'42'40"E., a distance of 1,334.41 feet; thence5.89'04'26"W., a distance of 1,306.80 feet; thence 5.0110'39"E., a distance of 2,667.44 feet; thence 5.89'08'23`W., a distance of 164.50 feet; thence 5.01'29'06"E., a distance of 1,333.63 feet; thence 5.8990'34"W., a distance of1,155.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 888SW IVAGNOLI Containing 829.74 acres, more or less; Till' subject to easements and restrictions of record. IIIBARBER& nialiBBRUNDAGE,INC. Professional Engineers,Planners&Land Surveyors C.W,Cw",.1/OJT.mi•••Td N.•Ny1.4A-MOS•KJ p41 1114111.hat CM)5614.1111 Lot Crow,. MS Haul,Swat-fen Myer,IFI.33901-M14NOTASURVEY' c.....M.(AottoeYsuw N...IA]44,.d Cilia p'1I J71JIf1.M WgJJa,,n FOR: J.D.NICEWONDER AGNOU, BARB RUNDAGE, INC. Professional sf - s, Planners & Land Surveyors METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR THE FLOW WAY COD Line,Li Located In Portions of SECTIONS 22&15,T 48 S,R 26 E. COWER COUNTY,FL. DRAW EY: ROP ASS PROJECT Ma.: 7 8BYCHECKEDBY: GPA ACRO FILE NAMEab_ Guy P. Ad.• s, P.S.M. # 4390 . DATE: 09 9 ( COCD ME Na: 788 `^ SCA{,E: t' . MO' EET DF EXHIBIT 2 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT "B" RHODES ctMODES'LAND SURVEYING, MCI 28100BO1V2TA GRANDE DRI I4 SUITE 107 BONITA SPRI11'O4 FL 34196 PHONE(0319 4668166 FAX(299)40X8163 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OR TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF COLLIER,LYING IN SECTIONS 10, 11, 15 AND 22,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,SAID PARCEL ALSO BEING A PORTION OF ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 53 PAGES i THROUGH 64 INCLUSIVE)AND BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 53 PAGES 1 THROUGH 64(INCLUSIVE);THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE PLAT OF SAID ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAP'FS,NORTH 89'58'48"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 990.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°17'41"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 1332.48 FEET;THENCE NORTH 8959'45"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 328.98 FEET;THENCE NORTH 00°20'27"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 1332.63 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH FRACTION LINE,SOUTH 8958'17"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 655.76 FEET;THENCE NORTH 00°14'37" WEST,A DISTANCE OF 1332.01 FEET;THENCE ALONG SAID FRACTION LINE,SOUTH 89°57'09" WEST,A DISTANCE 653.40 FEET;THENCE NORTH 00°09'00"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 1332.05 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 22;THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 22,SOUTH 89°54'39"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 651.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22,SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND ALSO BEING THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PLAT OF ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES;THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 15 AND THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID ESPLANADE PLAT THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES,COURSE ONE:NORTH 00°07'09" WEST,A DISTANCE OF 2,663.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 15;COURSE TWO:THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 15,NORTH 00'07'13"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 988.29 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT"P6"OF SAID PLAT OF ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT"P6"THE FOLLOWING 45 COURSES;COURSE ONE:NORTHEASTERLY, 185.62 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 359.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°37'3 I"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 54°28'20"EAST, 183.56 Fhh 1 TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE TWO:THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, 124.90 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 381.00 Hlht,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18°46'59"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 49°03'05"EAST, 124.34 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE THREE:THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, 150.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 312.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°38'40"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 44°3'714"EAST, 149.08 1-±,E1 TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FOUR:THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, 12339 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,988.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°33'22"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 32°34'35"EAST, 123.37 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FIVE:THENCE NORTHERLY,252.43 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE WESTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 412.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35°06'17"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 16°48'08"EAST,248.50 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE SIX:THENCE NORTHERLY,81.37 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE EASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 188.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24°47'52"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 1°38'55"EAST,80.73 FEET;COURSE SEVEN:THENCE NORTH 24"02'48"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 139.54 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;COURSE EIGHT:THENCE EASTERLY, 184.18 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 98.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 107°4I'02"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 77'53'19"EAST, 158.25 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE NINE:THENCE EASTERLY, 199.50 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR Z:IMIRASOL(Esplanade)1Esplanade plat12016-658 FLOW WAY CDD ESPLANADE DESC PAGES I THROUGH 4 OF 6,docx 1 of 6 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) RHODES&RHODES LAND SURVEYING INO 28100BONITA GRANDE BRIM SUITE 107 BONITA SPRINO4 FL 341596 PHONE(7139)#AY 8196 FAX(Q.%)405-81A9 CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 212.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°55'06"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 75°13'43"EAST, 192.22 FEET;COURSE TEN:THENCE NORTH 77°48'44"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 98.12 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;COURSE FI_FVEN:THENCE EASTERLY,68.66 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 88.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°42'20"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 79°50'06"EAST,66.93 FEET;COURSE TWELVE:THENCE SOUTH 57°28'56"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 38.87 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;COURSE THIR I hEN:THENCE EASTERLY, 140.15 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 112.00 I'Eh1, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71°41'55"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 86°40'07"EAST, 131.19 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FOURTEEN:THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, 113.60 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 225.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°55'44"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 65°17'01"EAST, 112.40 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FIFTEEN:THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, 101.15 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 212.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°20'10"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 66°04'48"EAST, 100.19 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE SIXTEEN:THENCE EASTERLY,38.76 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 38.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58°26'43"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 81°38'05"EAST,37.10 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE SEVENTEEN:THENCE EASTERLY, 119.37 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 212.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°15'37"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 85°16'22"EAST, 117.80 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE EIGHTEEN:THENCE EASTERLY,75.62 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 188.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23°02'51"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 89°52'45"EAST,75.12}Eh 1 TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE NINETEEN:THENCE EASTERLY, 172.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 212.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46°44'53"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 78°16'14"EAST, 168.21 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE TWENTY:THENCE EASTERLY,92.94 I•EE 1 ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 188.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°19'29"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 69°03'32"EAST,92.00 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE TWENTY-ONE:THENCE EASTERLY, 113.65 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 212.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30"42'52"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 67°51'50"EAST, 112.29 FEET;COURSE TWENTY-TWO:THENCE NORTH 52`30'22"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 75.67 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;COURSE TWENTY-THREE:THENCE EASTERLY, 185.77 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 188.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 56°37'01"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 80°48'53"EAST, 178.31 FEE 1;COURSE TWENTY-FOUR:THENCE SOUTH 70°52'38"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 215.48 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE TWENTY-FIVE:THENCE EASTERLY,84.99 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 312.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15°36'30"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 78°40'53"EAST,84.73 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE TWENTY-SIX:THENCE EASTERLY,72.99 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 138.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°18'09"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 71°20'03"EAST,72.14 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE TWENTY-SEVEN:THENCE EASTERLY, 109.44 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 162.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38°42'28"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 75°32'13"EAST, 107.37 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE TWENTY-EIGHT:THENCE EASTERLY,82.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 138.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°16'32"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 77°45'11"EAST,81.33 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE TWENTY-NINE:THENCE EASTERLY,91.37 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 162.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL 241MIRASOL(Esplanade)tEsplanade plat12016-658 FLOW WAY CDD ESPLANADE DESC PAGES 1 THROUGH 4 OF 6.docx 2 of 6 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) RHODES rk RHODES IAD SURVEYING 11V-C1 28IOOBONI22 GRdNDEDRIIF SUITE 107 BONITA EMMA IL 34135 PHONE( %!)405-8166 FAX(PM)4058163 ANGLE OF 32°18'53"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 76°46'21"EAST,90.16 FEET; COURSE THIRTY:THENCE NORTH 87°04'12"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 80.881-Et.T TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; COURSE THIRTY-ONE:THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY,224.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 138.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°01'46" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 46°24'55"EAST,200.25 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE THIRTY-TWO:THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY,330.36 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 312.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60°40'03"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 30°'14'03"EAST,315.14 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE;COURSE THIRTY-THREE:THENCE EASTERLY,57.69 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 112.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°30'43"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 75°19'26"EAST, 57.05 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE THIRTY-FOUR:THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY,383.12 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 308.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71'16'11"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 54°26'42"EAST,358.89 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE;COURSE THIRTY-FIVE:THENCE SOUTHERLY,484.39 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE WESTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 908.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°33'57"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 03°31'38"EAST,478.67 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE THIRTY-SIX: THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, 134.34 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 112.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 68°43'29"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 22°36'24"EAST, 126.43 FEET;COURSE THIRTY-SEVEN:THENCE SOUTH 56°58'09"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 74.98 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;COURSE THIRTY-EIGHT: THENCE EASTERLY,333.98 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 512.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3722'29"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 75°39'23"EAST,328.09 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE THIRTY- NINE:THENCE EASTERLY, 155.66 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 488.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18°16'33°AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 85'12'21"EAST, 155.00 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FORTY:THENCE EASTERLY,297.82 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 512.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33'19'39"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 87'16'06"EAST,293.64 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FORTY-ONE:THENCE EASTERLY, 178.15 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 488.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20°54'59"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 81°03'46"EAST, 177.16 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FORTY-TWO:THENCE EASTERLY,94.41 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 212.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25°30'56"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 78'45'47"EAST,93.63 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FORTY-THREE:THENCE EASTERLY,217.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 588.00 FEET.THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21°09'09"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 76°34'54"EAST,215.85 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FORTY-FOUR:THENCE EASTERLY,54.98 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 103.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°35'07"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 71°51'55"EAST,54.33 FEET;COURSE FORTY-FIVE:THENCE NORTH 56`34'20"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 160.60 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT"P6"AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PLAT OF ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES;THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES THE FOLLOWING SIX COURSES;COURSE ONE:THENCE SOUTH 00°51'44" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 738.10 DEET;COURSE TWO:SOUTH 00"49'56"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 2,676.38 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15 AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 22;COURSE THREE:SOUTH 00°50'55"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 1,334.40 FEET;COURSE FOUR:THENCE SOUTH 89°56'33"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,306.71 FEE;COURSE FIVE:THENCE SOUTH 00"38'40"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 1,333.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22;COURSE SIX:THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID FRACTION LINE,SOUTH 00°38'11"EAST,A DISTANCE OF Z:IMIRASOL(Esplanade)lEsplanade plat12016-658 FLOW WAY COD ESPLANADE DESC PAGES 1 THROUGH 4 OF 6.docx 3 of 6 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) RHODES&RHODES LAND SUB VE'YING INC 281010BONITAGRANDE DRIYF.s SUITE 107 BONITA&PRIMA FL 31136 PHONE(239)4058106 FAX(PM)405-8163 30.52 FEET;THENCE NORTH 89"59'08"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 655.79 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 00°44'05"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 1,303.59 FEET;THENCE NORTH 89°59'29"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 658.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE PLAT OF ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES;THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID PLAT THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES: COURSE ONE:NORTH 89'59'29"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 164.50 FEET;COURSE TWO:THENCE SOUTH 00°38'1!" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 1,333.71 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22;THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE,NORTH 89'57'17"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 1,156.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 849.40 ACRES,OR 36,999,864 SQUARE FEET,MORE OR LESS. Y JOHN ODES,P.S.M.,NO.LS5739 PR SSIONAL SURVEYOR&MAPPER STATE OF FLORIDA d c. ' ,fin? 1b . •6 '- A <' =tb ftp„i•1c_ 1J Z:Vv1IRASOL(Esplanade)1Espinnade pla1L016-658 FLOW WAY CDD ESPLANADE DESC PAGES 1 THROUGH 4 OF 6.docx 4 of 6 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) I ESSNNOT WF Ne t awn'cue aFmews I1 I IS S1/AS 1 9171164 , 5,1 15 C19 <s I L7 MAANZ WF AAO 11 1 M C7 L3C9 11 C C15 c+..,,axAv1RY CUB CF NOUS V . C14 C16 r'B ± C24 1s53 FSI SW 64C207HRU 1 NILo L C70 C72 c, llat nl VMC7 1 CI7 c? d. 4: 1 O 500 1000 ui n, n,I Iiiii AI c'} I M N n 1'= 1007' 1 o u,1fi i• 1 9I 368S• d C37I Nr i CJ2 G3 r LI I:I 1-11 CJ/ C3J C35 y,2u. w Ica 1 M C 5 UAE N6 1/4 SEC 15 S 11E tN 1/4 SEC 15 _ _ 1 14 16 7-5 N UNE 5W 1/4.0 15 i -- -N IINE SS£7/4 5I.0/5 - 1 11I I 30'RASH T-ac-WAY-I- g h 1 F EASEMENT OR HZ PC 376 ( II t 1A w In S M Ot n H i.-.7, I wo E4i.N/kr WF AAO 2 w,lllr ate a'Notts w. RI 33 PCs 124ll 64 I IS8934:T97Y i 16 15 651.08'_ S LINE SW I/4 SEC 15 1 16 — S IINE SE 1/4.2t 15 151 14 21 22 L6N 5 NW 1/4 SEC 22 - 22{22 N UAE AE 1/4 SEC 22 22 2t 8 I 2 2 u I ni n w N N I Pd: A 1+ n 4. 58957091Y n I n 4 58956:T.3'W 1.70671' ' a COINER a 653.40 g v SEC 2z 5 L1AE AE 1j4 AE 1/4 SEC 22 NE11 4 a J N 1N 2 g 1 SEC 22 1.4 11 . 4 1 o A M ESSNYA WIFNo * Fair TRACT 7T-4' Kik! I hair BAY COMMONS NW ate Cr NARES 1 t; r PB 44 PGS 46-54 12 Sl AG5 r SW 64 I COLDER BOULEVARD 1.o m '5 I I (BROKEN BACK ROAD) NORNER 5 OAK'NW I/4 SEC 22_ 58978'1716 _ _ ISI LVE 1 1,i 4 SFC 22_ _ - 22 27 SEC 22 'N LINE SW 1/4 SEC 22 65576' N 1hMF Si-'1/4 SEC22 V L 11 22 fi 23 2 I L10 I$ In Ik f 11 IIS i r I- 1 1 11 CRAW(car 040 m, I I icumin'ate Cr'Mars I g r 1H S3 RS1546!54 rli IQ 4f 4 1 u 1 I LI ti w g I t 1 1c. 1 ' ft ..*\ Or 1` `74 •'-^ 1od FASBtA0N7 i 1 Y LS Vg , r I a •' '.0443 FS 269 i in '- , .- rl ttwA590YIEHTfP.0.6. " r •r 'T.-1!,' K I( r^ tR 2458 FG 1701 SE CORNER SW 1/4 Y u)-iL 1 c t l • = k I _ 1 SECTION 22-46-26 • 1. '•.J`• o ,1)° t•• F.L 5MESW 7/4.4'r/13an ttlE_X'L45Et72- ,J (V' , tYr11 t;`'':" Yr : N8958'48'W 990.32 N8957Y7'W 1156.14' 1y Ts4.t(' / NOTES BaB)------- 7•Ir 11, . 1. BEARINGS ARE 545E0 ON THE FAWOKALLE ROAD(S R. 646) SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST ABBREVIATIONS err QUARTER Of THE SOUTHEAST JOHOTT RHODES PSM /5739 QUARTER. SECTION 22. TOWNSHIP 48 P.O.B.- POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST. ESPLANADE BO.B.= BASIS OF BEARING GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF PSM,= PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION NAPLES. 53, PAGES 1 THROUGH 64 LB./ g MAPPER TSB MICLUSNE).AS BEING NORTH BE. = UCENSEO BUSINESS NUMBER FLOW WAY CDD — ESPLANADE drawn: 8937'17'WEST AND RELATE TO THE OR = BUFFER EASEMENT FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE RB = OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK SKETCH CL/ SYSTEM TOR FLORIDA ZONE EAST. PC5 =PLAT BOOK J checked: NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983,PAGES 1990 ADJUSTMENT(44053/90). 1F dote: RHODES&RHODES SEPTBYBER 2, 2016 MMR 2. SUBJECT TO EASEL(ENTS 7H LAND SURVEYING. INC.. stole:view. RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF If LICENSE L6 6897 I' = 1000' y cn RECORD. Gadd Ire: 2016-559 CDD FLOW WAY oject/: J. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE'SUITE 107 2012-63 AND DECIMALS THEREOF. UNLESS BONITA SPRINGS. FL 34135 sheet r OTHERWISE 40150. 239)405-8166 (239)405-8163 FAX 501 6/ 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) LINE BEARING DISTANCE Ll N8959'45"E 328.98' L2 N24'02'48"E 139.54' L3 N774844E 98.12' L4 55728'56"E 38.87' L5 N52:30'22"E 75.67' L6 5705238"E 215.48' L7 N8 7'04'12"E 80.88' L8 .556'58'09"E 74.98' L9 N56'34'20"E 160.60' LW 500:38'11"E 30.52' L11 N89 59'08"E 655.79' L12 N89 59'29"W 658.03' L13 N895929"W 164.50' CURVE RADIUS DEL TA ARC CHORD CHORD BEARING Cl 359.00' 29'37'31" 185.62' 183.56' N54 28 20 E C2 381.00' 18'46'59" 124.90' 124.34' N4903'05 E C3 312.00' 27'38'40" 150.54' 149.08' N44;37'14 E C4 1988.00' 3'33'22" 123.39' 123.37' N323435 E C5 412.00' 35'06'17" 252.43' 248.50' N16-48'08"E C6 188.00' 24'47'52" 81.37' 80.73' N113855 E C7 98.00' 1074102" 184.18' 158.25' N77:5.3'197- C8 212.00' 5355'06" 199.50' 192.22' S7573'43"E 09 88.00' 44'4220" 68.66' 66.93' 57950'06"E C10 112.00' 714155" 140.15' 131.19' N86'40'07"E C11 225.00' 2855'44" 113.60' 112.40' N657 7'01"E C12 212.00' 2720'10" 101.15' 100.19' N66'04'48"E C13 38.00' 5826 43" 38.76' 3710' N81'38'05"E C14 21200' 3275 37" 119.37' 117.80' 58576'22'E 015 188.00' 23'02'51" 75.62' 75.12' 589'52'45"E C16 212.00' 46'44'53" 172.97' 168.21' N7876'14 E C17 188.00' 2879'29" 92.94' 92.00' N69'03'32"E C18 212.00' 30'42'52" 113.65' 112.29' N67 5150 E C19 188.00' 56'37'01" 185.77' 178.31' N80'48 53E C20 312.00' 153630" 84.99' 84.73' 578'40'53"E C21 138.00' 3078'09" 72.99' 72.14' S7120 03 E C22 16200' 38'42'28" 109.44' 10737' S75132'13"E C23 138.00' 3476:32" 8255' 81.33' .577'45'11"E C24 162.00' 3278'53" 91.37' 90.16' S76 46 21 E C25 138.00' 93'01'46" 224.07' 200.25' S462455 E C26 312.00' 60'40'03" 330.36 315.14' .53074'03"E C27 11200' 29'30'43" 57.69 57.05' .57579'26"E C28 308.00' 71'16'11" 383.12' 358.89' 55476 42"E C29 908.00' 3033'57" 484.39' 478.67' SOS3138 E C30 112.00' 68'43'29" 134.34' 126.43' .522'3624"E C31 512.00' 37'22'29" 333.98' 528.09' 575'39'23"E C32 488.00' 187633" 155.66' 155.00' 5857221"F C33 512.00' 3379'39" 297.82' 293.64' N8776'06 E C34 488.00' 2054'59" 178.15' 17716' N8103'46 C35 212.00' 25'30'56" 94.41' 93.63' N78'45.47 E C36 588.00' 21'09'09" 217.08' 215.85' N76 34'54"E 0.37 103.00' 303507" 54.98' 54.33' N71'5155"E SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION Pte ` SSR FLOW MAY CDD ESPLANADE drown: CU TABLES checked: e: RHODES&RHODES 7E11BER 2, 0010 MLR Ac,11'1`11' r dotSEP LAND SURVEYING INC. Scale:vlew: LICENSE/L8 6897 t S 8 codd dile: 2016-0, CQQ FLOW WAY _Fr0ject#: 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE war 107 2012-03 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 l Sheet #: 239) 405-8166 (2J9)405-8163 FAX J,6 of 6 i 1 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State November 17, 2016 Honorable Dwight E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples, Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Dear Mr. Brock: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66,Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 2016-35, which was filed in this office on November 17, 2016. Sincerely, Ernest L. Reddick Program Administrator ELR/lb R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 www.dos.state.fl.us 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) pCC CE C ORDINANCE NO. 12- 41 By AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2009-21, THE MIRASOL RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY INCREASING THE PERMISSIBLE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS FROM 799 TO 1,121; BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND 74 DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING 3 CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 95+/- ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) TO THE MIRASOL RPUD; BY REVISING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN; AND ADDING DEVIATIONS AND REVISING DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR 846) BORDERED ON THE EAST BY BROKEN BACK ROAD AND FUTURE COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) IN SECTIONS 10, 15 AND 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 1,638.6+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, IMCOLLIER JOINT VENTURE, represented by Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the PUD and change the zoning classification of the additional herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ZONING CLASSIFICATION The zoning classification of approximately 95 acres of the herein described real property located in Sections 10, 15 and 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural Zoning District to the Mirasol Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District and when combined with the existing Mirasol RPUD provides for a 1,638.6+/- acre project in accordance with the revised Exhibits A-F, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as Mirasol RPUD\PUDZ-A-PL2012-303 Page I of 2 Rev. 9/26/12 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this f3/4" day of Nae n , 2012. ATTETf''..• .:.: !t , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWJOIT ly BRt k1,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: L`.I AL. ate u Clerk FRED W. COYLE, C aA`t; z t d ;t,C*1*Qtr 44 4nd'or, e ar Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: A-- CI() r‘ eidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development Standards Exhibit B2 - Flag Lot Scenario Exhibit C - Location Map Exhibit C2 - Master Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - Deviations Exhibit F - Developer Commitments CP\12-CPS-01158\48 This orcinor t:4, with the Secretory of S?.:re's Office e 2 ' jay of and acknowledgement of that filin rec ived ` ' aY of Mirasol RPUD\PUDZ-A-PL2012-303 Page 2 of 2 BY Deputy c,.rxRev.9/26/12 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT A FOR MIRASOL RPUD PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 799 1,121 residential units and a maximum of 36 18 golf course holes may be developed within the RPUD. I. Residential/Golf Tracts (RG): A. Principal Uses: 1. Single-family detached dwelling units. 2. Zero lot line dwelling units. 3. . - -• . . • . . . Townhouse dwellings. 4. Two-family and duplex dwellings. 5. Multiple-family dwellings. 6. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals determines to be compatible in the "RG" district. B. Accessory Uses/Structures: 1. Uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted 2. Guest houses. 3. Common area recreation facilities for residential residents and their guests. I. Clubhouse or recreation centers for residential uses. fr. 4. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters. 6. 5. Model homes, model home sales centers, welcome centers and sales trailers, including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, as well as resale and rental of units. 6. Golf course, practice areas and ranges, golf cart barns, rest rooms, shelters snack bars and golf course maintenance yards for residents and their guests. PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 1 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 87 7. Golf Club Complex as located on the Master Plan: i) Retail establishments accessory to the permitted uses in the District such as, but not limited to, golf, tennis and recreation related sales for residents and their guests. ii) Restaurants, cocktail lounges, and similar uses intended to serve for residents and their guests. iii) Pro-shops, golf club, tennis clubs, and health spas for residents and their guests. iv) Golf course,practice areas and ranges, golf cart barns, rest rooms, shelters snack bars and golf course maintenance yards and facilities. 9: 8. Shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools, and other types of accessory facilities intended for outdoor recreation for residents and their guests. 1$ 9. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. ff. 10. Essential services, pursuant to the- 12. 11. Water management facilities and related structures. 13: 12. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or architectural or structural bank treatments. 14. 13. . - - .pParks, recreational facilities, community centers for residents and their guests. 1-5-. 14. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the developer, builders, and their authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 1-6-. 15. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffer berms, fences and walls. 1---. 16. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals determines to be compatible in the RG" district. II. Conservation/Preserve Tract: A. Principal Uses: PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 2 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised:September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 1. Passive recreation uses limited to the following so long as clearing for such uses does not result in the reduction of Ppreserve acreage below the minimum requirement: i. Boardwalks ii. Environmental uses (wetland and conservation areas) iii.Pedestrian bridges iv.Eq est« ., t« it iv Pervious nature trails except where American Disabilities Act requires otherwise. v v. Native Wildlife sanctuary vi. Inclement weather shelters, in preserve upland areas only unless constructed as part of a permitted boardwalk system. The shelters shall be a maximum of 150 square feet each. 2. Environmental research 3. Drainage and water management facilities subject to all required permits. 4. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list or permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals through the process outlined in the LDC. PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 3 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT B FOR MIRASOL RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP) or subdivision plat. TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RG" RESIDENTIAL AREAS PERMITTED Single Zero Single Multi- Clubhouse/ Two Family Family Recreation USES Family Lot FamilyandDuplexAttaehed Buildings AND Detached Line Townhouse*12 Dwelling*12 6 STANDARDS I 2 3 4 5 6 Principal Structures Minimum Lot 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per 33-5002,000SF 9,000 SF n/a Area lot or unit 3 Minimum Lot 50' *7 40' *7 35'per lot 3 20' 7 90' n/a Width*4 7 or unit*7 Front Yard 20' *2 *7 20' *2 *7 20' *2*7 20' *2 7 20*2 25' Setback Side Yard 7752 5'*7 0 or 10'7.5' *7*8 7.5' *8 141/2 BH*5 5' Setback*2 11 7 Rear Yard 15' *7 15' *7 15' *7 15' 15' 0' Setback*1 Setback From 10' *7 10' *7 10' 10' 10' 20' Golf Course Setbacks from 25' 25' 25' 25'25' 25' Preserves Maximum 35' 35' 35' 35'50'(5 stories 50'(2 stories Zoned Height not to over parking not 10 exceed 50') to exceed 50') 9 Actual Height 45' 45' 45' 45'65' 75' 10 Floor Area 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 750 SF n/a Min.Per Unit(S.F.) Distance 10' 10' 10' 10'20='/2 SUM 15'or.5 BH Between of BH*5 whichever is Principal greater*6 Structures PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 4 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised:September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Single Zero Two Family Single Multi- Clubhouse/ Family Lot and Duplex Family Family Recreation Accessory Detached Line Attached-and Dwelling Buildings Structures Townhouse 6 Front Yard SPS*7 SPS*7 SPS SPS SPS SPS Setback*2 Side Yard 5' *7 0 or 10'5' 5' 401. 1/2 BH 5' Setback 7 Rear Yard 40 5' *7 40 5' *7 40 5' 40 5' 10' 40 5' Accessory Setback 1 Setback From 10' 10' 10' 10'10' 10' Preserves Distance 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10'0'or 10' 0'or 10'0'or 10' Between Accessory Structures on the same lot Distance 0'or 402 5' 0'or 40'5' 0'or 40'5' 0'or 401 5' 0'or 40'5' 0'or 40'5' Between Accessory and Principal Structures on same lot Maximum SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS 35'5PS 35' Zoned Height 10 Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS 45'SPS 45' 10 Front yards for all uses shall be measured as follows: If the parcel is served by a public road right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). 1 - Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lakes and open spaces. Setbacks from lakes for all principal and accessory uses may be 0 feet provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from the Collier County Engineering Review Section. 2 - Single-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and provide for guest parking other than in private driveways may reduce the front yard requirement to 10 feet for a side entry garage. Multi-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and provide for guest parking may reduce the front yard to 15 feet. This reduction shall not result in an approval to impede or block the sidewalk. Front loaded garages shall be a minimum of23 feet from the edge of sidewalk. 3 - Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 square feet for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet. 4 —Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. 5- Building distance may be reduced at garages to half the sum of the height of the garages. 6 Although neither setbacks nor separation between structures are applicable to the clubhouse and other recreation structures located on a clubhouse tract, neither the clubhouse nor any other recreational structure shall be located closer than 25 feet from any residential or preservation boundary. 7- The use of flag lots is allowed to provide maximum flexibility in subdivision design and may vary from the minimum lot widths. However, neither the minimum lot area, nor the minimum distance between structures may be reduced. 8-Zero foot (0')setback for internal units. PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 5 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9 Inclusive of under building parking 10 Buildings shall not exceed three stories within 1,250 feet of Immokalee Road. 1 15' side yard setbacks shall apply to lots equal to or lesser than 70' in width. Lots greater than 70' in width will provide 6' side yard setbacks. 12 Maximum length of buildings shall not exceed 300 linear feet. BH = Building Height SPS = Same as Principal Structure Notwithstanding the foregoing: none of the footnotes shall operate as a deviation from the Land Development Code unless they are listed as deviations on Exhibit E.None of the footnotes operate as deviations from the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. PUD7_-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 6 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) JLc g BUILOINC FOOTPRINT 1 F.,h ea i ti 1 0 Z I FLAG LOT S J 1 1 tC113-1 1 r FLAG LOT 7 I 1 FLAB 101 J I DENOTES LOT LINE NOTE: IRIS E1HIBIT IS FOR RLISTRATIVE PURPOSES TO SNOW NOW CERTAIN GEOMETRY OF A Cl/EN TRACT WOULD FACILITATE TOE IMPLEMENTATION OF A•FUG LOT'DESIGN LAYOUT. 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET PREPARED FOR: PR4[C1 NAME I.M. COLLIER JOINT VENTURE MIRASOL PUDA I Comm....1 A.d...bdw N...U N/4N.$4131464 DRAAMJG NAME:AGNOLI isppBARBER& FLAG LOT SCENARIO EXHIBIT'82' JJ:'. IBRUNDAGE,INC. DRAWN er ROP ARe PROJECT No 7883ProfessionalEngineers,Planners 8e Land Surveyors REME•En er. ROP AcAD TU NAME, 9814Ex8-82WierCom?:id T.44.4 MI N.•N.p R•PIN Nu CM/3117a111•has tun mans DATE:Woe DRAhWG FILE No.: N/A SCAM N/A SAM: I Of I PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 7 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25.2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) SEE SHEET#2 FOR CONTINUATION FORRPPLAN MUNDANE: p R/8 SPECIAL NOTES SEE o MEET a OF e R/8 R/8 U CONOPks. AMU R/8 L 1 NJC R/8 STiFND PRESERVE OOIIOE TNAI awe,.... OE W.. R/8 Si NEMTME R/8 croo) NI ENTRYizIaIeNADE s PRIVATE SKIM R/8 1 to'TYPE 9'LL.E. Rill. ,00 PROPO$EP O.R.NI EIIT.•• • • • • • • • • • yAr RO.M.eEelaAT1011 7 Lf AINTENANCE FACILITY TREE FARM e)ROM PRIVATE SPINE I POSSIBLE MU MM, R/8 INTERCONIxCT L°` WALDROPMI L PROPERTY ENGINEERING MIRASOL 0 0. eoaNDARY Cal Ew»s.r.u. EY9lll.a..91. I PROPERTY 1y m».....rwawE-.ncwr eOIINDAM ® ® ;i IufEsaww» nwrrmr II2r144t0 V''• 1(/ POaflelE awl.rI.. .y • i MUM RAMA<faeina rrm4m SIr1mI . . . .•N" ONME`T MIRASOL a R/8 R.P.U.D.AMENDMENT FUTURE ACTIVITY 0'00 •'•'•'•'•CENTER CONCEPTUAL i m: MASTER PLAN WI I I ] 1 ' 1•I EXHIBIT 110111 IMMOKALEE ROAD(tR.BM) to ME ilikN SHEET 1 OF 3ENTRY a e Le E SISIAOE n n'J FILE NAME:27600B06024we Pi 1 UPDATED:2012-09-25 PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 8 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised:September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) I A1 7 aa11 1 LEE COUNTY rf 1: . . . NVACANT OUT PARCEL OWNER: FLANIAX UC• limps PROPERTYPABOUNDARYmin A} VACANT r• IN VACANT g. If1 I•, TERAFINA I FUOI WALDROP•...............................•.... ENGINEERING 4 M16JAB10A IYY• UM 1•11111111111111111 MK-IMMO SEE SHEET#1 FOR CONTINUATION MOM 11171.111.11.114110 R 0114116.771I"U{IIHIM FII. MOTE u>®Ifavr na wrmr m.IIw FOR PLAN LEOENO AND SPECK NOTES SEE MEET I OF! MIRASOL RP.U.D.AMENDMENT CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT"C2" ti SHEET 2 OF 3 a FILE NAME:27600BD6024w, UPDATED:2012-09-23 PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 9 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) L CONCEPTUAL LAKE LOCATIONS R/G RESIDENTIAL/GOLF PRESERVE RIGHT-OF-WAY 1 LAND USE AREAS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO RELOCATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LDC. SPECIAL NOTES: 1) WHERE APPLICABLE ALONG PROJECT BOUNDARY AND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PRESERVE AREAS SHALL SERVE AS BUFFERS. IF AFTER EXOTIC REMOVAL THE PRESERVE VEGETATION FAILS TO MEET MINIMUM CODE BUFFER STANDARDS ADDITIONAL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REQUIRED. NATIVE HABITAT SUMMARY: EXISTING NATIVE HABITAT= 895.6 As. ± REQUIRED NATIVE HABITAT= 537.4 As. ± PROVIDED NATIVE HABITAT (ON SITE) = 537.4 As. ± ACREAGE SUMMARY: MISECTION22=425.8 As. ± SECTION tS = 634.6 As. ± SECTION 10 — 578.2 As. ± TOTAL= 1,638.6 As. ± 1. TOTAL AREA OUTSIDE DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY= 928.8 As. ± HIALDROPTOTALAREAWITHINDEVELOPMENTBOUNDARY=709.8 As. ± ENGINEERING Ora EIY.A.•UFO i ineumeR v Ytl1M MN MITA YA/[NR-YOM1 NMf ON aMtN ii R lM4•7117 11111/144441/111 rlbmA CMIZICJn O YIORY i MIRASOL R.P.UD.AMENDMENT CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN Z EXHIBIT"C2" R SHEET 3OF3 ii FILE NAMB:27600E06024w$ UPDATED:2012-09.25 PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 10 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT D FOR MIRASOL RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) PARCELS: 1) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST '/4, 2) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST '/a, 3) THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST '/a, 4) THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST '/a OF THE SOUTHEAST '/a AND ALL OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST '/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST ''/4, THE EAST ''/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST ''/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST '/a, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; AND THE WEST '/z OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST '/a, THE WEST ''/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST ''/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST '/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST '/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST ''/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST ''/a OF THE SOUTHWEST 'A, THE EAST % OF THE EAST '/z OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE SOUTHWEST '/4 OF THE NORTHWEST '/a OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 'A OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST '/, THE WEST 3/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST '/a, THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 11 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised:September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH V2 OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 1638 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 12 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT E FOR MIRASOL RPUD DEVIATIONS 1. Deviation #1 seeks relief from Appendix B of the LDC Section 6.06.01.0, ended t - •_ - _ . . . ", which requires cul-de-sacs and local streets - . . - .. . . -- !!e' •.to have a minimum sixty (60') right- of-way width and two (2) ten foot (10') wide travel lanes, to allow a minimum right-of-way width of 40' for private local streets and fifty feet 50' for private spine, : - roads. 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J. Street System Requirements, to allow cul-de-sacs in excess of 1,000' in length. For any cul-de-sac exceeding-100 1,600 feet in length, the roadway must include at approximately 4400 1,600 feet intervals design features which provide for the ability of emergency vehicles to turn around. Traffic roundabouts, eyebrows, hammerheads or similar design features shall be allowed. 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.Q. Street System Requirements, which requires that street name markers shall be approved by the County Manager or designee for private streets or in conformance with U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. This requirement shall be waived. However, breakaway posts shall be used. 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.R. Street Requirements, which requires that street pavement painting, striping and reflective edging of public roadway markings shall be provided by the developer as required by the U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. This requirement shall be waived for private roadways Traffic circulation signage shall be in conformance with U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device standards. 5. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.H, which requires 1 parking space per 200 square feet of office/lobby/pro shop/health club/ clubhouse/lounge/snack bar/dining/meeting room associated with golf courses. The requested deviation is to allow for 3 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of office/lobby/pro shop/health club/clubhouse/lounge/snack bar/dining/meeting room associated with the proposed golf course. Parking spaces for golf course holes, exterior recreation uses, and maintenance buildings will be provided per the LDC. 6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.04.A, which limits the developer to 100 acres of residential, commercial, or industrial lots or building sites to store excess fill generated by lake excavations within the PUD. The requested deviation is to allow the developer to clear up to 300 acres of residential, commercial, or industrial lots or building sites to store excess fill generated by lake excavations within the PUD or project where the excavation is taking place. This is not a deviation from the Collier County Excavation Ordinance. 7. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum wall height of 8' throughout the development. Where abutting an existing or future public roadway, a 20' tall wall, berm, or combination wall/berm is permitted. PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 13 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 8. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5, which permits a maximum of five (5) model homes, or a number corresponding to ten (10) percent of the total number of platted lots, whichever is less, per platted approved development prior to final plat approval. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of six (6) model homes per development tract, not to exceed forty (40) model homes within the overall RPUD. As part of the application material for every building permit for a model home, the developer shall provide documentation stating how many model homes are in existence so that the maximum of forty (40) model homes is not exceeded. 9. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height. The requested deviation is to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height. The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 28 days per calendar year. 10. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.2, which permits one (1) real estate pole sign per street frontage that is setback a minimum of 10' from any property line. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of two (2) real estate pole signs per street frontage setback a minimum of 5' from the property line along Immokalee Road only. 11. Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, which requires on-premise directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from internal property lines. The requested deviation is to allow for on-premise direction signage to be setback a minimum of 5' from internal property lines. This deviation does not apply to property adjacent to public roadways. 12. Deviation #12 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development with a maximum height of 8' and total sign area of 64 s.f. per sign. The requested deviation is to allow for two (2) ground signs per project entrance with a maximum height of 10' and total sign area of 80 s.f.per sign. 13. Deviation #13 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development. The requested deviation is to allow for one (1) ground sign at the property corners fronting on existing and proposed public roadways that provide access to the project, in addition to two (2) ground signs at each project entrance. The proposed ground signs at property corners, commonly referred to as "boundary markers", will be permitted at a maximum height of 10' and sign area of 32 s.f. per sign. 14. Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A, which requires sidewalks on both sides of roadways internal to the site. The requested deviation is to allow for an 8' wide sidewalk on one side of the private spine road as shown on the PUD master plan, and 5' wide sidewalks on one side of all other private, local roadways internal to the development that service residential units on one 1) side of the roadway, and/or terminate in a cul-de-sac up to a maximum length of 2,500 I.f. PtJDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 14 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 15. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 10.02.04.0 which limits the developer to one (1) Site Development Plan submittal for concurrent review with the final plat at such time as the applicant submits the response to the first staff review comments. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of three (3) Site Development Plan submittals for concurrent review with the final plat at such time as the applicant submits the response to the staff review comments. PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 15 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) EXHIBIT F FOR MIRASOL RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Regulations for development of the Mirasol RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order in which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. A. RPUD MASTER PLAN 1. Exhibit "C2", the RPUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries, shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as platting or site development plan application. Subject to the provisions of Section 10.02.13 of the LDC, RPUD amendments may be made from time to time. B. TRANSPORTATION 1. Upon the County's adoption of a CR-951 extension corridor alignment, and within 180 days of the County's request, the Developer Owner, its successors or assigns, shall dedicate to County fee simple right-of-way for the roadway and drainage system at the : -:- - •- . . e el agreed upon appraised value per acre, for those areas located outside the limits of the residential/Golf Course areas depicted as R/G" on the PUD master plan. Upon recordation of the deed or other conveyance instrument in the public records of Collier County for the dedication of the right-of-way, the Developer shall become eligible for Transportation Impact fee credits in accordance with the consolidated impact fee Ordinance in effect at the time of recordation of the dedication. If the project is built out or has prepaid transportation Impact Fees to be assessed for the project, then the Developer or its successors or assigns shall be eligible to request cash reimbursement. The Developer shall not be responsible to obtain or modify any permits on behalf of the County related to the extension of CR-951. 2. The Developer shall construct a 10' multi-use pathway to be located along the Immokalee Road right-of-way on the North side of the Cocohatchee Canal as a part of the entrance construction. Completion of construction of the pathway shall be completed concurrently with the vehicular connection to the existing bridge over the Cocohatchee Canal. 3. - .. 9 PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 16 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised:September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) the terms of that agreement, the project is vested for 799 dwelling units for the As set forth by the Mirasol PUD Developers Contribution Agreement (DCA), dated May 3, 2007, the Developer was responsible for a total financial commitment of $3,229,588.00; and upon satisfaction, Mirasol would be vested for transportation concurrency for 799 residential units. The Developer satisfied the financial commitment by funding improvements to the Immokalee Road-Collier Boulevard intersection, which were completed by March 31, 2009 at a cost of$3,187,912.68 and the remaining balance of$41,645.32 was paid to the County. A letter confirming satisfaction of the financial obligations and project vesting was issued by Collier County on April 23, 2009. 4. The Developer, its successors, or assigns, agree that at the time of any subsequent e . issuance of a building permit for the 400th residential dwelling unit authorized by this PUD, or commencement of construction of the intersection improvements, the Developer, or its successors or assigns, shall be responsible for their respective fair share of the North leg of the CR-951/Broken Back Road intersection with Immokalee Road, which includes modification, replacement,or relocation of the at-grade bridge crossing the Cocohatchee Canal. 5. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 781 Two Way, unadjusted PM Peak hour trips. 6. The Developer may use the eastern entrance from Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard as shown on the master plan for "construction-only" traffic upon issuance of a County road right-of-way permit for temporary access. Developer shall be required to install a stabilized road base and provide for dust abatement measures for the construction traffic. 7. At the time that Developer applies for a road right-way-permit for a permanent eastern entrance from Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard as shown on the master plan, Developer shall construct at its cost the two northbound lanes of a future four lane road design of Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) from the Quarry's north entrance (alternatively, from its terminus that may be north of the Quarry's entrance as a result of road construction by others for their site specific access needs) to the Mirasol project's eastern entrance. The roadway shall be constructed in accordance with the design standards including drainage features and sidewalks of a two-lane collector roadway as required by the Collier County LDC and Code of Laws and Ordinances at the time of issuance of the road right of way permit. The Developer will be required to construct only those site access improvements such as turn lanes along Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR- 951) that are specific to the Mirasol project. In the event the County at time of issuance of the road right of way permit requests improvements to Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) that exceed the collector standards of the LDC and Code of Laws and Ordinances, then Developer shall be eligible for impact fee credits for those additional improvements. The County will accept the roadway by Resolution for ownership and maintenance one (1) year after acceptance of the construction of the roadway. The Developer shall not be required as part of this PUD to provide for offsite treatment and storage of stormwater for Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) outside of the County's road right of way. The PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 17 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) stormwater is planned to be conveyed to the Quarry for storage/treatment or to another off-site location as directed by Collier County. C. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. As a part of the environmental resource permitting process of the South Florida Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding impacts to protected wildlife species will be 21. • . . . - The project shall retain a minimum of 537.4 acres of native vegetation on-site in compliance with the Growth Management Plan. Easements or ROW created for access to outparcels within the preserve or for future extension of the CR-951 corridor shall not cause the preserve to fall below the minimum native vegetation retention requirement. require prior approval from the District Environmental Compliance Staff. Such e 515.2 acres of 586.2 acres (88 percent) of the required wetland•mitigation acreage. The remaining 71 acres of off site mitigation shall be identified prior to SDP approval. The 71 acres of off site wetland mitigation shall be located 5. The minimum preserve acreage shall be maintained. Additional preserve D. EXCAVATION Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a commercial or development excavation pursuant to Section 22-106 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County Florida. The entire water management pass-thru will be constructed at one time as per South Florida Water Management permit PUDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 18 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised:September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 11-02031-P, as amended, prior to the residential development under an administratively issued "development" excavation permit as long as no more than 20,000 c.y. of material is removed off-site. As per Section 22-106 of Code of Laws and Ordinances, a commercial excavation permit will be required for removing more than the approved 20,000 c.y. of material off-site. E. OUTPARCEL IN SECTION 10 A temporary access easement shall be granted by the Owner to the owner of parcel number of 00178760007, at a location specified by IM Collier Joint Venture it's successors and assigns. At such time that the northern portion of the Mirasol RPUD has access to a public road, the developer shall provide reasonable access from the parcel number 00178760007 across the Mirasol RPUD to the public road. Both the temporary and permanent easements shall be granted to the owner of this parcel, at no cost to the County or the owner of this outparcel. F. UTILITIES 1. The developer shall connect to the Collier County Water Sewer District (CCWSD) potable water system at a location determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2. The developer shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 3. The developer shall connect to the CCWSD Irrigation Quality water system at a location CCWSD when capacity is available. G. PLANNING The developer shall complete construction of the golf course and temporary golf pro shop/locker room prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the 10000 dwelling unit. The developer shall complete construction of the permanent golf pro shop/locker room prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the 500`0 dwelling unit. PIJDZ-A-PL20120000303 Strike-through text is deleted Page 19 of 19 Mirasol RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: September 25,2012 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I , DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of : ORDINANCE 2012-41 which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 13th day of November, 2012 , during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 19th day of November, 2012 . DWIGHT E. BROCK ;_' Clerk of Courts .and Ex-officio to $oard County Commissiorsr y: Teresa Cannon, Deputy Clerk 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) mp *rnz C_ * cn 4.4ro0x1 bmrn ° w RESOLUTION NO. 18 - 52 on• • ow z o omo"thA RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY o r N COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY m rn .. FLORIDA, v xi N -0 RENAMING A PORTION OF ESPLANADE BOULEVARD o TO MONTELANICO LOOP. THE SUBJECT STREET IS W APPROXIMATELY ONE THIRD OF A MILE IN LENGTH, rri rn LOCATED WITHIN ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES, APPROXIMATELY ONE AND A QUARTER MILE NORTH OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, IN o SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20170002424] WHEREAS, the legislature of the State of Florida by enacting § 336.05, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to name or rename streets and roads, except for certain state roads; and WHEREAS, Collier County pursuant thereto has adopted Collier County Ordinance No. 07-62, as codified in Chapter 22, Article X, of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, which establishes criteria and procedures to rename streets or roads; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) has held a public hearing after providing notice as required by said ordinance and has considered the advisability of granting the request by Jeremy Arnold, P.E. of Waldrop Engineering, on behalf of Taylor Morrison Esplanade Naples, LLC, to rename a portion of Esplanade Boulevard to Montelanico Loop. This street is located within Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples, in Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 62, Pages 64 through 69, of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida and further described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that all criteria set forth in Ordinance No. 07-62 have been met and specifically finds that there is no other street in incorporated or unincorporated Collier County with this name or any similar sounding name as is being requested; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is necessary for identification purposes to confirm the name of this street. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Effective this date, the name of the portion of the street described in the above recitals is hereby changed from Esplanade Boulevard to Montelanico Loop, and is confirmed as such. 17-CPS-01702/1394611/1]42 2/13/18 SNR-PL20170002424 Page 1 of 2 CA 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and noted upon the maps of the street and zoning atlases of Collier County, and notations made on the referenced Plat. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super majority vote this 1 day of V1arcr , 2018. ATTEST:•` `: 4 v F BOARD OF CO I TY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BRQCK,cLERK COLLIER C• T •, FLORI P 1 )l, L N1 . BY: A Attest as to Cha e• pu Jerk A rP SOLIS, Chairman signature only. Approved as to form and legality: Am. q/(0,, e, Scott A. *tone Assistant County Attorney Exhibit A—Legal Description and Sketch 17-CPS-01702/1394611/1]42 2/13/18 SNR-PL20170002424 Page 2 of 2 0 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Exhibit A HODES'&RHODES LAND SUB VEIING; INC JOHN'SOIYIT BHODEti ESM THOMA E 11.130DE4 PEAL PHONE(&39)405-8185 FAX(PS)4054163 MONTELANICO LOOP DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF COLLIER,LYING IN SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,BEING A PORTION OF TRACT"RI",ESPLANADE BOULEVARD,ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES PHASE 3 BLOCKS"K 1" "K2"AND H3",AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62,PAGES 64 THROUGH 69(INCLUSIVE)OF THE PUBL IC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1357 OF ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES PHASE 3 BLOCKS"K1","K2"AND"H3",AS RECORDED IN FLAT BOOK 6Z PAGES 64 THROUGH 69(INCLUSIVE)OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,SAID POINT BEING AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF TRACT"R1",ESPLANADE BOULEVARD,SAID POINT ALSO BEING A POINT ON A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE;THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF TRACT"RI",ESPLANADE BOULEVARD THE FOLLOWING TEN(10)COURSES,COURSE ONE: NORTHWESTERLY,4.58 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 370.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°42'32"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 60°54'42"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 4.58 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE TWO:NORTHWESTERLY,17.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 5,030.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°1140"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 61°10'08"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 17.07 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE THREE:WESTERLY,587.93 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 676.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49°4g52"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 85'59'14" WEST,A DISTANCE OF 569.57 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FOUR:WESTERLY, 599.72 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 679.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°36'21"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 855559"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 580.42 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; COURSE FIVE:NORTHWESTERLY,383.34 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 624.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35°1154"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 42'41'52"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 377.34 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE;COURSE SIX:NORTHWESTERLY,33.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 678.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°49'49"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 23°41'00" WEST,A DISTANCE OF 33.49 FEET TOA POINT ON A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE;COURSE SEVEN: NORTHERLY,94.64 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE EASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°33'20"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 15°18°41"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 94.42 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE EIGHT:NORTHERLY,2.41 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°31'35"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 11°1T49"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 2.41 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE NINE;NORTHERLY,75.48 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 673.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06"25'35"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 10°50'48"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 75.44 FEET TOA POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE;COURSE TEN:NORTHERLY,52.18 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE EASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 810.50 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03"41'19"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 05°47'22"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 52.17 FEET;THENCE NORTH 86°03'18"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE,SAID POINT ALSO BEING AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID TRACT"R1",ESPLANADE BOULEVARD OF SAID PLAT;THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF TRACT"R1",ESPLANADE BOULEVARD THE FOLLOWING NINE(9)COURSES;COURSE ONE:SOUTHERLY,48.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 760.50 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°41'19" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 05°4727'EAST,A DISTANCE OF 48.95 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE;COURSE TWO:SOUTHERLY,79.41 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE EASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 623.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE 0E07°18'12"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 11°17'07"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 79.36 FEET TOA POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE;COURSE THREE:SOUTHERLY,54.12 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE EASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°24'10'AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 21°08'17"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 54.01 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FOUR: SOUTHEASTERLY,23.11 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°17'45"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 24°41'30"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 23.10 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE FIVE:SOUTHEASTERLY,32.95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 618.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°0317'AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 23°34'16"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 32.95 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE;COURSE SIX:SOUTHEASTERLY,346.48 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 564.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35°11'54"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 42°41'52" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 341.06 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE;COURSE SEVEN:EASTERLY, 6.73 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 619.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°36'21"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 85'35'59"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 529.13 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE EIGHT:EASTERLY,567.76 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTH HWNG A RADIUS OF 736.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°11'56"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 88'48'12"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 553.79 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE NINE:EASTERLY,37.63 FEET ALONG THE ARC OFA CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86°13'58"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 70°1(747"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 34.17 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID TRACT"R1" ESPLANADE BOULEVARD; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID TRACT"R1" ESPLANADE BOULEVARD THE Z:‘ESPLANADE NAPLES NAVD\PHASE RSKETCH AND DESC\2017-731 MONTELANICO DESC.docx PAGE 1 OF 2 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) RHODES it-RHODES'LAND SURVEYING, INC JOHN SCOTT RETOD1N FLU THOMAS E 1:1130DE5 PM PHONE(839)405-8166 FAX(B59)05-8169 FOLLOWING TWO(2)COURSES;COURSE ONE:NORTH 27°0348' EAST,A DISTANCE OF 10186 FEET TOA POINT OF CURVATURE;COURSE TWO:NORTHEASTERLY,26.36 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHEASTEREY7HAV I NG A RADIUS OF 575.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0Z3737"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 28°2736"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 26.36 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 60°18'35"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON- TANGENTIAL CURVE AND TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID TRACT R1" ESPLANADE BOULEVARD;THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF TRACT"R1" ESPLANADE BOULEVARD THE FOLLOWING TWO(2)COURSES;COURSE ONE:SOUTHWESTERLY,24.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 525.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°37'3T AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 282736"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 24.07 FEET;COURSE TWO:SOUTH 27°03'48"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 103,46 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE AND TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF TRACT"R1" ESPLANADE BOULEVARD;THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID TRACT"R1" ESPLANADE BOULEVARD THE FOLLOWING TWO(2) COURSES;COURSE ONE:SOUTHERLY,38.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE EASTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 87°15'46"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 16°34'05"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 34.50 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;COURSE TWO:SOUTHEASTERLY,0.63 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE,CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY,HAVING A RADIUS OF 430.00 FEET,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°0502"AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 60°09'27"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 0.63 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 3236'18"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 60.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 2.65.5 ACRES OR 115,630 SQUARE FEET,MORE OR L ESS. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,BEING NORTH 89°4549EAST,AND RELATE TO THE STATE FLA NE COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED BY THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY FOR FLORIDA EAST ZONE,1983 DATUM WITH 1990 ADJUSTMENT. John Scott Rhodes STATE OF JOHN SCOTT RHODES,P'SM#5739 PROFESS ONA L SURVEYOR& MA ITER STATE OF FLORIDA Z.ESPLANADE NAPLES NA VDU'llASE 3\SKETCH AND DESC320 I 7-73 I MONTELANICO DESC.docx PAGE 2 OF 2 211 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 1zg11F '5.'Z' i$ A I aiN1.-- I- OJ2f ' u.ZafO M.t y4, / Li a F Na o/ s ill w i q i / 111, 1, 1 _ v i/ y f/ ,bj/1I \\I,: o , 11` r{, AI/ l/ II S «,if / 4// ,1 ` v` it I r/ 1{1 I I ,i, 11 c1 it 1vi p a nu, f Q a yv y o 1,i , a trig, d0,,2§,,2§,, , { I,, VU_°,C.i 1wy•l= .luV ,, .< x ``r 1 JI 'bw{w ‘ 0 )n 1 keid ill ' -az AA ' 1` \\ sz j1 fix 1,,. - ' „', yr { , , { u O $ . 11` I OU g,r -I/y L IA vY w{ r v) d i; a1 1 UI A/ u ifi7C:::V L' I:ellii h 111 j 1--{ ,\`4 \ l \IAC,) 0// a Y'1 'z 11 Yrl i m l 1T_ r r "lrt- Y' { \ , 1 { II Il _ , i / j e i /:P/ {u t6 l `' 1'" -,,,,,-..0-2,0" t - --_,--_---7-:... hal 1 w i ///,"/ f/, `1 ,.-.," 1 y ,, - 1 - - 111 ffi l ,b I - z SS- s { { ^ , ri 1 I// / , i f/ i /I/ Vl l Irl r /,. A A ,{ W , 1 iii i i/ Aso' . 3 Ili ,, ' - 11 11 1 1 4 11 //, \ '/ ,` \y, ` \ 1111 `1( 0.^i.1 Fw V\--if Ll.l IV `v 111 1,A, tt i1,. AA 0:-/- f-'/ ` `{` 1 Itj Thi, Q 1{`1` Y,4 i' n Z LL z \{r-'-'' {,{ ` 1 O1-Q w e, IP i Z > Ra r I t{ 1_r- w I > P 1, a v 1i (>A``9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 386Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: August 23, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXHIBIT B FOR ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table 1 below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in the applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP) or subdivision plat. TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR “RG” RESIDENTIAL AREAS PERMITTED USES AND STANDARDS Single Family Detached Zero Lot Line Two Family And Duplex Townhouse *12 Multi- Family Dwelling *12 Clubhouse/ Recreation Buildings *6 Principal Structures Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per lot or unit *3 2,000 SF 9,000 SF n/a Minimum Lot Width *4 50’ *7 40’ *7 35’ per lot or unit *7 20’ 90’ n/a Front Yard Setback 2* 20’ *2 *7 20’ *2 *7 20’ *2 *7 20’ *2 20’ *2 25’ Side Yard Setback 5’ *11 0 or 10’ 7.5’ *8 7.5’ *8 10’ or 1/2 BH for structures exceeding 35 feet *5 5’ Rear Yard Setback *1 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 0’ Setback From Golf Course 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 20’ Setbacks from Preserves 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ Maximum Zoned Height *10 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 50’ (5 stories not to exceed 50’) *9 50’ Actual Height *10 45’ 45’ 45’ 45’ 65’ 75’ Floor Area Min. Per Unit (S.F) 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 750 SF n/a Distance Between Principal Structures 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 20’or ½ SUM of BH for structures exceeding 35’ *5 15’ or .5 BH whichever is greater *6 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: August 23, 2018 Accessory Structures Single Family Detached Zero Lot Line Two Family And Duplex Townhouse Multi- Family Dwelling Clubhouse/ Recreation Buildings *6 Front Yard Setback*2 SPS *7 SPS *7 SPS SPS SPS SPS Side Yard Setback 5’ 0 or 10’ 5’ 5’ 10’ or 1/2 BH for structures exceeding 35 feet *5 5’ Rear Yard Accessory Setback *1 5’ 5’ 5’ 5’ 10’ 5’ Setback From Preserves 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ Distance Between Accessory and Principal Structures on Same lot 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ 0’ or 10’ Distance Between Accessory and Principal Structures on Same lot 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ 0’ or 5’ Maximum Zoned Height *10 SPS SPS SPS SPS 35’ 35’ Actual Height *10 SPS SPS SPS SPS 45’ 45’ Front Yards for all uses shall be measured as follows: If the parcel is served by a public road right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). * 1 – Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lakes and open spaces. Setbacks from lakes for all principal and accessory uses may be 0 feet provided architectural treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from the Collier County Engineering Division. 0’ principal and accessory setbacks are permitted from lake maintenance easements and landscape buffer easements. *2 - Single-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage driveway may reduce the front yard requirement to 10 feet for a side entry garage. Multi-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and provide for guest parking may reduce the front yard to 15 feet. This reduction shall not result in an approval to impede or block the sidewalk. Front loaded garages shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk. *3 - Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 square feet for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: August 23, 2018 *4 Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. *5 - Building distance may be reduced at garages to half the sum of the height of the garages. *6 Although neither setbacks nor separation between structures are applicable to the clubhouse and other recreation structures locate don a clubhouse tract, neither the clubhouse nor any other recreational structure shall be located closer than 25 feet from any residential or preservation boundary *7 – The use of flag lots is allowed to provide maximum flexibility in subdivision design and may vary from the minimum lot widths. However, neither the minimum lot area, nor the minimum distance between structures may be reduced. *8 – Zero foot (0’) setback for internal units. *9 Inclusive of under building parking *10 Buildings shall not exceed three stories within 1,250 feet of Immokalee Road. *11 5’ side yard setbacks shall apply to lots equal to or lesser than 70’ in width. Lots greater than 70’ in width will provide 6’ side yard setbacks. *12 Maximum length of buildings shall not exceed 300 linear feet. BH = Building Height SPS = Same as Principal Structure Notwithstanding the foregoing; none of the footnotes shall operate as a deviation from the Land Development Code unless they are listed as deviations on Exhibit E. None of the footnotes operate as deviations from the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: August 23, 2018 EXHIBIT C2 MASTER PLAN 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: August 23, 2018 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: August 23, 2018 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: August 23, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXHIBIT D FOR ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) PARCELS: 1) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, 2) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 3) THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 4) THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 AND ALL OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAAND ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: August 23, 2018 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 3/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS ACCESS EASEMENT 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: August 23, 2018 FOR HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. CONTAINING 1658.3 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) PARCELS: 1) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, 2) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 3) THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 4) THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 AND ALL OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: August 23, 2018 THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 3/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Strike-through text is deleted Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: August 23, 2018 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS ACCESS EASEMENT FOR HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. AND THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 1668.31 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXHIBIT F DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS G. PLANNING 2. The 112 dwelling units added to the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD through the PUD amendment approval dated Oct. 14, 2014 must be developed within the 19.7-acre parcel to the east of private spine road in Section 22 (Parcel no. 00187360003). * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SUMMARY ESPLANADE RPUD HATCHER PARCEL ADDITION SEPTEMBER 2018 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE Naples, FL 34104 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade PUD – Hatcher Parcel Addition Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Updated September, 2018 1 I. INTRODUCTION The Esplanade project (formerly known as Mirasol) encompasses a total of approximately 1,638.6 acres in three sections of northern Collier County north of CR 846 and east of Interstate 75. A residential and golf course community is under construction, with access provided from Immokalee Road (CR 846) along the southern property boundary. Most of the southern two sections were historically mowed and continue to be used as cattle pasture. Altered sheet flows, originating from the north and east currently back up at the Cocohatchee Canal outfall and flood the property on an annual basis. This led to unchecked proliferation of melaleuca across the entire property that depressed wildlife utilization of the area. This survey update was conducted on the adjacent 10.0 acre Hatcher parcels which are under consideration to be added into the Esplanade PUD. The parcels are located along the south-eastern boundary of the Esplanade PUD and both currently contain single family residences, ornamental nursery space, and forest with varying degrees of melaleuca and Brazilian pepper infestation. To characterize surrounding land uses of the Hatcher parcels, the Esplanade project is located to the north and west of the parcels while lands to the east consist of an abandoned tree nursery. To the south is an ornamental nursery and landscape company. Access into this parcel will be through the Esplanade project. To consider potential effects of the proposed project on any state or federally listed species that may utilize the property for feeding/foraging and/or nesting, a Threatened and Endangered Species Survey was originally performed on the entire Esplanade property in 2000 and 2001. Subsequent site visits and surveys have kept the investigations current. This report summarizes the results of the subsequent survey activities that have been undertaken to date on the subject parcel. II. METHODOLOGY Prior to any wildlife survey, careful consideration is given to the habitat type/s in question and species that are known to utilize such areas. Before any survey is carried out a number of publications and references are consulted. These include: The Official List of Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (latest dated May, 2017), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) Wildlife Methodology Guidelines, The Standardized State-Listed Animal Survey Procedures for SFWMD ERP Projects, and the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) for Collier County. The basic objective of any wildlife survey is to obtain evidence that a listed species is using the subject site. The site may comprise a primary or secondary feeding/foraging or nesting zone or merely be adjacent to those sites for a particular listed species. As many 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade PUD – Hatcher Parcel Addition Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Updated September, 2018 2 species of concern in Florida are cryptic/camouflaged and/or nocturnal/crepuscular, patience and sufficient time must be devoted to the survey. Aerial photos and FLUCCS mapping are consulted prior to arriving on-site and a system of meandering transects is followed throughout the subject area. The most recent field study traversed the entire site in a series of transects spaced approximately 50 to 100 feet apart. Fieldwork has taken place from February 2018 to August 2018. Approximately 20 hours have been spent on this site devoted to wildlife survey in addition to the more than 1,000 hours that were spent on the adjacent properties A slow pace along transects was maintained, stopping every few minutes to look and listen for movement or calls of any animal. Indirect evidence such as rootings, scrape marks, nests, cavities, burrows, tracks and scat were looked for and duly noted. Because of the presence of fox squirrels on the adjacent Esplanade project, special consideration was given to tree-top observation for potential fox squirrel daybeds or nests. A list of dates and times of wildlife surveys for this latest effort is provided for review. Species observed during the monitoring are included below. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A list of all wildlife species observed on or adjacent to the site is provided below. Common Name Scientific Name Reptiles & Amphibians Southern toad Bufo terrestris Green treefrog Hyla cinerea Cuban treefrog Osteopilus septentrionalis Brown anole Anolis sagrei Black racer Coluber constrictor Dusky pygmy rattlesnake Sistrurus millarius barbouri Birds Anhinga * Anhinga anhinga Snowy egret * Egretta thula Cattle Egret * Bubulcus ibis Tricolored heron * Egretta tricolor Little blue heron * Egretta caerulea Green-backed heron * Butorides striatus 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade PUD – Hatcher Parcel Addition Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Updated September, 2018 3 Great Egret * Ardea alba Great Blue Heron * Ardea herodias White ibis Eudocimus albus Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura Red-bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus Pileated woodpecker Drycopus pileatus Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Carolina wren Thryothorus ludovicianus Wild Turkey * Meleagris gallopavo Red shouldered hawk Buteo lineatus Turkey Vulture * Cathartes aura Grey catbird Dumetella carolinensis Killdeer * Charadrius vociferus Brown Thrasher Toxostoma rufum Blue-grey gnatcatcher Polioptila caerulea White Eyed Vireo Vireo griseus Woodstork * Mycteria americana Unidentified warblers Mammals Nine-banded armadillo * Dasypus novemcinctus Marsh rabbit?? (scat) Sylvilagus palustris Fox Squirrel * Sciurus niger Grey Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis Raccoon Procyon lotor White-tailed Deer * Odocoileus virginianus Black Bear (tracks) * Ursus americanus floridanus * Observed on adjacent properties or flying overhead. During the survey period wood storks and a variety of other wading birds were observed flying over the property to and from the lake banks and created marsh area on the adjacent Esplanade project. Fox squirrels have been observed within the internal and western preserves on the Esplanade project. Some stripped melaleuca bark and chewed pine cones were observed on the subject parcel but could have been the result of grey squirrel utilization. No fox squirrels, nests, or daybeds were observed during the survey period. Bear tracks have been observed approximately 1.5 miles north of the property along the Section 10/15 borders. An exhibit depicting listed species sightings is included for review. A list of species that would be expected to occur on the subject site can be given through analysis of known vegetative communities both on-site and contiguous to the site and available background data. Sources include the Fish and Wildlife Service Multi Species Recovery Plan, Part 2, Appendix C, Species of Concern and their Respective Community 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade PUD – Hatcher Parcel Addition Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Updated September, 2018 4 Types in South Florida, in addition to communication with personnel at state and federal wildlife agencies. Vegetative communities are presented by FLUCFCS code with numbers in accordance with the supporting map together with potential wildlife species. Consideration of the suitability and likelihood for a given community to support a particular species is given in light of adjacent and contiguous land uses. Abbreviations used in the discussion are as follows; F = Federal S = State E = Endangered T = Threatened SSC = Florida Species of Special Concern C = Federal Candidate *= FWS Species of Management Concern R = Rare FLUCFCS CODE 411: Slash Pine Flatwoods Appendix C lists the following potential species within the community type Mesic Pine Flatwoods; Florida Weasel (Mustela frenaata peninsulae, R), Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia, *), Florida Black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus, FC, ST), Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi, FE, SE), White Ibis (Eudocimus albus, SSC), American Kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus, *, ST), Sandhill crane (Grus canadensis pratensis, ST), Bald eagle (Haliaetus leucocephalus, FT, ST), Red cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis, FE, ST), Audubons crested caracara (Polyborus plancus audubinii, FT, ST), Eastern Indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi, FT, ST), Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus, ST), Eastern Beard grass skipper (Atryone arogos arogos, *). Of the above species, the Big Cypress Fox Squirrel, Florida Panther and Black Bear were highlighted by the U.S Fish & Wildlife Service as potentially occurring on this site or utilizing portions for range or feeding grounds. Wood Storks (FE) were also highlighted as potentially utilizing the site because of the wet nature of the existing conditions. Typical habitat required by the Big Cypress Fox Squirrel consists of mature open slash pine adjacent to cypress forests. The majority of the property does consist of pine and pine-cypress flatwoods, however melaleuca infestation is heavy throughout. FLUFCS CODES 625: Hydric Pine with Melaleuca Listed species potentially observed within this classification include all of those listed in the pine flatwoods community described above as well as the following: Ivory Billed 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade PUD – Hatcher Parcel Addition Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Updated September, 2018 5 Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis, FE, SE) and Wood Stork (Mycteria americana FE). No sightings of the Ivory Billed Woodpecker have been verified on the US mainland in recent years except for a potential sighting in Arkansas a few years ago. Wood storks were observed on the adjacent project as described earlier in this report. The hydrology and ecological integrity of the site have been altered by upstream and downstream activities resulting in elevated water levels during the wet season as well as a proliferation of exotic infestation. The majority of this parcel has been impacted to varying degrees by the invasion of exotic plants, primarily melaleuca and Brazilian pepper, thus the ability to support viable populations of listed species is reduced. IV. SUMMARY The existing condition of the subject site is a heavily exotic infested, hydrologically altered, reduced viability property. Special interest in the property as Big Cypress fox squirrel habitat was taken into account during the survey efforts. Investigation of the site in the course of this study has shown that the property offers, at best, limited use potential for any wildlife due to the exotic infestation, seasonally high water levels and the distance from an established core protected habitat area. The site is part of essentially an island that is completely surrounded by existing and future development. The undeveloped areas to the east of the parcel have been under review for development though no site work has been done on them to date. According to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the closest known panther was an uncollared animal that ranged from Bird Rookery Swamp approximately three miles to the northeast down to the residences along Rose Blvd approximately ½ mile to the west. The subject property offers a limited prey base, limited denning opportunities due to the exotic vegetation and no through connectivity to other wildlife areas. Development of the subject site is not expected to result in detrimental impacts to state or federally listed wildlife species, primarily because past use patterns, surrounding activities, and altered hydrology, as outlined above, have reduced the sites’ ability to support populations of listed species. In the most recent U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion for the Esplanade (Mirasol) project FWS stated that the project would not jeopardize the existence of wood storks or panthers. They also opined that the project may impact wood storks by eliminating potential forage base due to the proposed wetland impacts but their opinion was that the enhancements proposed to the project preserves would more than off-set the proposed impacts. The enhancements now realized with the construction of the foraging areas and removal of exotics within the project preserves have improved wood stork and other wading bird foraging activities and should give assurances that wood storks will not be adversely affected by the project. The Esplanade project, to which this parcel is being added, has the potential to support several listed species, as well as a host of non-listed resident and transient species. Preservation and enhancement of the extensive on-site preserve will increase the 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Esplanade PUD – Hatcher Parcel Addition Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Updated September, 2018 6 usefulness of the property as feeding/foraging areas for all species currently utilizing the area. Proper management of the preserve areas, coupled with the size of the preserve, and the limited access should serve to create an area of great use to several local listed species. Habitat Management Plans have been created and are being implemented in the preserves. These plans call for site-specific management activities to take place that will improve habitat value for the target species. These practices include periodic burning, planting plans, midstory vegetation removal, or other management practices. These plans were provided as part of the Esplanade PUD approvals and will not change as a result of the addition of this parcel to the project. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & RPUD BOUNDARY IMMOKALEE ROAD COLLIER BOULEVARD10-ACRE ADDITION SHEET: FILE NAME: WALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P: 239-405-7777 F: 239-405-7899 EMAIL: info@waldropengineering.com PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 27644E1001.dwg ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD AERIAL MAP 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Page 1 of 4 ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD REZONE CONSIDERATIONS (LDC 10.02.08.F) LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable”: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of the project narrative. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The properties that abut the project on all sides of the subject property are zoned MPUD and allow for residential uses, with the exception of Agricultural zoned lands to the south that are used as a landscape nursery. The abutting Tree Farm PUD to the east has similar zoning classifications and allowable uses to the proposed 10-acre addition to Esplanade Naples RPUD. Therefore, the proposed petition would not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The proposed boundary of the RPUD logically follows the external boundary of the parcels assembled for the rezoning, and creates a compact and contiguous zoning district. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed rezone is not necessary but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. The proposed uses are allowed under the current zoning classification and are appropriate considering the underlying Urban Residential future land use. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed RPUD is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Page 2 of 4 neighborhood. The proposed 10-acre addition will accommodate infill development in an urbanized area, and within the scope of a master-planned community with services and infrastructure in place. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The proposed addition of lands will not increase the approved density within the RPUD today, and will therefore have not impact on traffic congetstion. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed RPUD request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area; provided an environmental resource permit that addresses stormwater best management practices, stormwater pollution prevention, urban stormwater management, on-site stormwater treatment, and attenuation storage is obtained from the South Florida Water Management District. The project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria will be evaluated by County staff at time of SDP and/or plat review. Furthermore, the additional lands will be served by the overall water management infrastructure within the existing RPUD and allow for efficient use of this existing drainage system. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated this RPUD would reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. The proposed building height is consistent with the existing approval. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. The proposed change will positively impact surrounding property values by providing for quality infill development that is an extension of a successful, partially developed master-planned community. The continuation of a logical residential development pattern will provide an improvement from existing conditions. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed RPUD will encourage improvement and development of adjacent properties by continuing compact, infill development in an urbanized area with existing 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Page 3 of 4 services. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. The proposed development complies with the GMP and the LDC and does not constitute a special privilege. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The proposed uses and development standards are not permitted, according the existing Agricultural zoning classification. The proposed RPUD is more appropriate than the existing zoning in consideration of the GMP, surrounding development pattern, existing services, and available public infrastructure. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The proposed addition to the existing RPUD is logical and provides for a continued development pattern in an urban area of the county where development of this nature is appropriate and expected to occur. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would some site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. The site does not contain extensive wetland or environmentally sensistive areas that would justify its permanent preservation. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The proposed addition of lands will not increase the approved density within the RPUD, and will not impact public facilities and services. The project will continue to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Page 4 of 4 objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Attachment E. Back Up Esplanade 4-4-19 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) Statement regarding Taylor Morrison proposal to add approximately 10 acres for 37 housing units to the existing Esplanade Golf and Country Club PUD. I have no objection to this proposal per se, it has the potential to enhance the community by the development of equivalent homes on the current eastern border of Esplanade. Nevertheless, I do have serious concerns which need to be addressed as part of any approval document. The units approved should be denied any access whatsoever to any of the Esplanade amenities. Or, in the alternative, to allow such units access to Esplanade amenities, four requirements should be required in the approved document. The most critical and obvious need is parking. Exhibit E, page 15, deviation 5 of original Ordinance 14-35 dated October 14, 2014 granted a parking deviation. This deviation reduced the otherwise required parking requirement by 40%. That did not solve some slight construction issue. lt is a huge deviation which has left the development seriously under parked. Doing the math, it eliminated 145 parking places. Again, that is huge. At approximately 57% built out, the community is already out of parking. ln addition, Taylor Morrison has already added 47 units to the original plan and now is asking for an additional 37 units, neither of which increased parking. A proportional increase would be an additional 27 parking spaces, a total of an additional 173 parking spaces. I implore Collier County to require the addition of this parking. The second item is the planned clubhouse. I implore Collier county to require the size of the club house to be increased by 10% to handle the additional density. This same density issue is present with respect to all of the other completed amenities which should also should be increased but perhaps is not practical at this point in time. Nevertheless, the Club House construction has not commenced and could easily be expanded. The third item is a requirement that the housing units will be the same minimum size and quality as the existing development, with equivalent inf rastructure. The fourth item is no further future additions without an expansion of all amenities. February, 27,20L9 Ronald E. Miller 8570 Amour Ct. Naples, FL. 34119 815-507-0154 ron m ille r05 2645 @ema il. com 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Attachment F. Public Correspondence001 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) NOTES PARKING ISSUES AT ESPTANADE GOI.f AND COUNTRY CLUE PARKING QUIREMENTS PER T (from aooroved as of ?): 1. 'Existing: app€ars to rEftrto cirra Z)15, bcfore Weflness Center, pool & Bahama Bar werc opened-2. 'Propo6€d' .ppears to t€ftr to Uhtt ras rEsary for the opening of thce facilitis, plus the pro shop- Facilitks abo induded (dtte to court co.mts shorn) are thc 2 bocce courB, tlE 2 added tennb couns, and the 4 pickleball courts. 3. The footnoted '9x de4tnbr of twmol ,t:quirarr//r's pt",uisi,//t ol tDca.os.oa Gf appears to rEftrenoe the tDCs requiEments br a '@ff C.our:e. bustness:4. '4 per hole plus 1 Fr 200 sguare feet for ofr@/tobby/pto shodtqalth club/crubhouse,4ounge/snack bar/dining/n3ding mom areas aN il 'F.rcr,d d rcnal ,aqurcnrlnts lor exto(ior r*reation usas irc*xling:swimming pools, gotf diing ranges aN tannis cou s. ' Thete is also a rcquir,rnent for 1 space Fr 10o0 sq.ft. ol caft bany'maintenance eqpt. spacf-.5- Question: 1^rhat were th€ cddhkhviustillcati{rns ftr space rcdlrti)o uithan RpuD Devirtbn *5? -ia E:IE EE*T5 EGffiNETilCET-T5 EE- ET EE E E EE E 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Attachment F. Public Correspondence001 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) qlntlrt slur.fo.r lc d Uildr 2. 20191 since this assumed dme perkrd, both tlre nu pro shop and the Resort Amenities Center have opened. Wlat additionol p*lng does tlrc Ltr require fu the* tvo new focilities? Currert parldng spaces ayailaHe: . 2o3ca caft'normaf spaces . 26 cart-only spaces (20 actual spaces, plus E po&sible within the pavered crosswalk). 9 Handicapped spaces MAIORCOI{CERT{ ln collier county Planning's eyes, what do th€y consider as a .goff course. business for t-DC parking requirements? How is an allowed 5()% rcduction in parking requirEme.nts rclated to other associated businessesfacilities {e.9., sporG courts, fitnes< centers, swimming pools, restaurants, etc.) justified? whe,, do€s a 'tolf co,rce' beconre rcmething else, and tfte 5o% deductirn no lorger applies? ln Esplanade, if the acquisition by T-M of the pending -10 acres is approved, the planned 34 - 37 homes to be built there will have no golf privileges but will have full access to all otlrer Esplanade amenities. ln fact when T-M finishes dwelopment of the community, there will be 1205 doors; howeyer, the T-M stated cap on golf membeBhlps will be 850. Thus, almost :m% of Esplanade,s population will be imposing parking demands related onlv to the nontolf amenities, That is added to the use of those facilities bV the 850 golf member homes, completely unrelated to thei, play of golf. For the "golf course' business category the LDc requires 4 parking spaces / hore, 1 space per 2fi) sq. ft. of pro shop, 1 per 2 practice tees + 1 per putting green, and I / lOU) sq. fL of cart and maintenance bams. ln Esplanadc/s case, using T-M supplied data, the required spaces are gl. ohat number shouH be at least 94. since the practice range will accommodate 15 teet and there are 3, not 1, putting greens.) Let us look at what the lDc pa*ing requirements would normally be for each of the other .businesses. located wathin the amenities campus: Soorts courts (tennis, oickrebafl, and bocce) - 12 aveirabre g 3/court = 36 spaces Swimmim pool/spa - one of each totaliry Am sq. ft = 45 soaces Wellness Center: Assuming Collier County will considet goff cart parkirg spaces eguirraknt to normal spaces for parking requiremen6 satisfuction, the current condition is: + 42 parting spaces vErsus the abore dlart + 2 Handicepped spaces 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Attachment F. Public Correspondence001 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) This building actualty serves 3 distincdy diffurent "businesses' - the Koquina Spa (open to the public alsol), the indoor recreationThealth facility, and a colered outdoor gathering space w/ fireplace. Treating these as separate 'hrsinesses' and estimating the spece allocated to each, the requirementg would be: 1- Koquina Spa (wltfi 2 stations for halr care, 2 stations for pedkure, 2 statifis for manicure, and 3 massage stadonsl = 17 soaces 2. Fitness Center (@ l space/1m sq. fr) =lZISpaSC:3. Ortdoor gatfiering pordr e V2m sC. fL (esL 4{X) sq. ft) = 2 spaces Bahama Baa: . At T-M',s stated 652 sq. fL / 72 seaB plus 1 space per 200 sq. ft of non-public area, th€ parking space driver within the LDC is clearly the number of seats. However, the actual number of seats set up is 12& wi$ no crording at all. Based on this real number, the LDc requirement of 1 space / 2 seats + dre non-public arca = GS soac€s Resort Amenities Center: o Muhi-purpose facility with Same room and large meeting room plus a reception area. Using the "private organizationy'club' catqory, there is an LDc requirement of 1 space per lm sq. ft. or 1 per 3 seats, whicherrer is greater. The ffoor area of the building plus outdoor seating area is roughly estimated to be 5ooo sq. ft (including outdoor seating area| and there ls seadng at the center for 87 pecons in place at all times. Therefore, parking requirements are spacedriven, yielding a minimum requirement of y) spaces. SUmMARY - IEEDED pAnreilG tocr nomd tIrC reodrqncotsl zsE spaces (nor6olf relatcd) 9a spaces {gotf relaed} 352 total 3o.c$ needcd EX€UlDltlG CULJItttRY CE,T.TER /Ia oenalrdm now,l + Note: using the 5o% parking deduction provided in the LDc, the minimum requirement of today (excludint the future culinary center) would be for 223 spaces, and T-M has provided, as of now, a total of 238 spaces including golf-cart-only spaces. 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Attachment F. Public Correspondence001 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) CUUilARY CtEtfiER {in permittml ESIMATES The following data is derived from the high{erad architectural drawilg of the interior/ofte or spaces of this planned facility. lt is to be the 'crfln j*el' of the T-M amenities complex at Esplanade. GrandBalkoom tZO Priyate Dining Zg Grill Room 62 Barrel Housey'Bar N Teaching Xitdre{Wine Tasting 20 Gfe/Orefs Mar&et 10 2W indoor total Badq7ard Pado Terrace Ih€ Deck outdoor total TotdculinaryOE csL seadr6= :186 (@ 1/60 sq. ft. & esl ot![ 1I2O,W q. lL, min. l,e,oting = 333) 50 rto 15 105 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Attachment F. Public Correspondence001 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) lH !)Jotl a-' mo o{ P io F ..I {o !Po o F ! 7 6 't o rD Ga q ilI, E! 4 2I T vxzovmoc n rn =mz{o fl, E 1l #a r)II flT nui ifi $t ss 9B ABu9 E1 -dr fia E- t, Eo.D 3ilio 6e 6cgB E* ilrf,,> ;ma g l fl, g .ll i! E zo{ B 2 : !m!I 12o oa rnrllz !mar m I 'I g .t,| g ln -{ an|Itr q mmz .{o o }.,l\)\,\.:r o (, n,-J I E or!rrPlJ-9fifi*F*eEEsX'€B{8BBBT6:gET H$iHfiH ."59niE-r IniIAI IHgEf;EgFH:Fg i;*;Eia:E laBgE irPo 89Xrla<cD-{H0 a E0 !I' N 9.A.1.hPacket Pg. 421Attachment: Attachment F. Public Correspondence001 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & 37.483.30 (551.4, 0.u) 590_@ e160t.ar) (rq6t9.77) 27.550-05 qlt:7.1r o.@ om om 0.00 0m o00 om 0.m 0.00 0.00 0.m 107,688 45 o.m o.m 0m o5e33) (5,n8 $) Q2-441.69) (t,034.7E) 4.7$.9' 1,939.02 0.m (37^ffi71t 91,E5496 37,4t3 30 12.531.28 000 680.00 (2a6Or.a6) 00,6t9.7D 36,263.3J o.m 000 0.00 0m 0lr) 0.m o@ om om om 350.m 0.m 1,49,909 56 o00 0m 0.m 9,87129 219-49 lJ47t9 9,210 05 6361.47 1,495 42 0.m 0.m (t,032.ta) o.@ om oq) o.@ a,B\A (r,t2zlr) om 0m o.m om 000 o.m 0.m o00 0.00 3,O.00 om (r06,17? s5) om 0.m 0.m 5,086.J5 (r6r.0, 11,607.3t )x4$ (6,mE.ra (t51.26) om G36,q8.27) (j3x96B.ra) 37,4t3 30 13,603.,14 0.{p 6m_0 ca60l rs) 00,619.7r) ls,xo.6l orn o.m 0.m 0m 0.m 0.0) o_m 0.0 o.m om 350.m 0.0 \4nx7_94 o.m 0.m 0.m 0,5m.t0) zx920 0 7,.r4r.7o 8.6?624 13,7t5.71 1125.03 om t.E97-13lE o.m 37..183 30 t,IJfLtS rzlot -n od) 0m om 6r0m o.o (:160r {r) om (10,6t9.7D (32L54) 55,244.23 o.00 0-@ 0.m 0m o.@ 0m o(x) 0m 0.m 0m o.m 0m 0.m o-@ 0.o 0.m 0.m o.m om om o.m 3Jom om 0.00 0a55152) r,6E7,674.72 oo oo om 0m om 0.@ or"91.39) q4m75 1,9t9.7t r,2',t6.12 (rt995.6' 3,44t 3t (5r3. ) 5J?1.34 735L24 r,159 3,r 6?951 2"191.n 0.m _______gq_ 5.{t9ja 1124955.31 4a5ll.l0 4,153,95295 0m I14,67102 030r.67) l1JO4.6o om om o(D 6po.@ os (r-60l a8) o.ln 00,619.7D D,?53.A 44.27r_41 o@ om 0(I, om oo 0.0) 0.(I) o.q) 0(I 0.@ 0.o o.m o(D 0.00 om 0.00 om 0.m o(D 0.@ 0.m o.m 0.0 0.@ 2r,416a 1,457,001.E5 om 0.00 0.m o.q) 0.m 0m 7,990.85 3,069.4r (962rt) 2,050.52 2O,E' t4 (16,261.65) c4654.9) L02r.tt 6J56.rD 6,72965 6.L 58.630.o-...g D7,t3t.5 19t,01o.t9 5zi.650.12 4,1t2425.t3 0.o 0.m 0.fr) (4fi.06) 0.(} 0.m (33?^21) (657.2r) um (359.€) 31,677.9I 0.@ E,t]zti 655,4R.fl) 7?_t t8 72 68,(80l7 (14591.t5) 2rn$ t4,:65 93 1.761.3 0m om o{B 0.{[ 6sQo om 0 00 (:aA)l $' i)'.xl 0m (l0,6t9lr) 'iln G0,9m E?) 7l_516E2 D,2434t o@ (1T,2..-9' (r7O,238 95) 0@ om 0.m 0m 002 0.v2 0@ 0m om 0.m 00) 0.q) 000 0m om 0m 000 0a) 0.ol) 000 0.m 0.00 000 000 0m 000 0.m 650.m) o.ao 0 m 000 0m 0.00 (23O,659_En L749,t4t.At 2vl',tn 22 om om om 0.@ 593 46 593.46 0m 0.m 0m (3..40134) 3,7a469 7t52s 7E{ rO r r 55 (2,04t.9' (19,71203) (10.61]957) (435 92) (3943.21) 2.E58.86 t30 73 (1,429 68) Ll,3E4 2l (2,3.{5.45) (zg2_14) 99 61 0 00 0m 0m 0.m 26,0:: :o fffiiiZl- 1t rqmr z1 0.527 t3) 4.980.155 05 827,E29.21 o.q) o.m 0.m 0.m 0.m om (48f.06) 3,424600m o.m 0.@ om (354.98) 2,21661 (65721) 9,2$.94 0.m 000 (359.e) 13.722.?5 (43990) 30,793.11 0.@ 0.m G2eat3)___jPl:!j:_ G,fl9j6) 5,039,611.0t 0.m 0.m 0.00 (4$ 5) 0.00 0.m (3J6.53) (657-?t'.) om (359.6t) (.{39.90) 0m (1r4.3E) 825,534 84 om o@ o.m om 05,&o.m) 0.m 0.m 0.00 om o00 0.m (4t5,6e.60) (15r,6m.68) ,7393L16 LE9l.63l E4 t,,les3x ?! o.m 0m .0.mo00 0.00 0.mo.m 000 0.m (962.12) 5,348.84 (4$.06) 0m 0.m 0.m 0.m 0.00 0.m o45.74) 1,531.65 W.52) (6572I) 11,829.7t (657.21) o.m 0.m 0.o 0,02d32) ts,r6l.28 059.6t) 0,m 0 m o(tr om ____99_ o.m (19r9.J9) 35,9?15 (1,E4s.57) 68,8655? 1,5:1,763.29 O34,t0r.41) 0.00 l.omm 0m l,611,294 71 o0o 0.a21,191.97) 04.42307) (210,17991) 05,ll3.07) (2E6,948]..) 0.00 0.m 0m 0q) Ir,533.42 (62,1m.04) 455t 7t (62.rm 04) 0.00 15.2?0.60 0.m 0.m (507,011.12) 569,141 9 (51r,46s.13) 163,93098 (422.59.J6) 3,685,694 :7 0.q) 0 @ om 0.00 o0 0m (4&.(6) 4,*6 n 0.m 0.m o.m 0m (35124) \924V (657 2l) 10,51536 0.m om (359 68) t\44211 0.m 3r,629l 00 ______!q (1,E49.19) 63,945 24 .t0,661 9t 4,2I7.E96.20 om o.m 000 4,E67.78 0.m 0.m 1,280.41 | 1,172.57 0m ldEol.60 o00 0.00 .r1.1:: 16 --.":t :() 0m 0.m 0.m I,S5.65 0.m o.m 2,573. t6 9,ts8.I S 0.@ t4.0E2.43 31.33.01 o0 6t.65:41 \rl'.4olE 14 0m 1.0@.m 06 r,000 m o(} I,lrn.q) 0.m l,mo.m (4t 1.09604 1,611,294.2 00 r.631.D4.72 O(n 1,611.294.72 0.m 1,631,294.72 0m (1,421,393.97) O.W t*X$H#t#tl O.tD *n r{#rral{ om {rHH*nHllrHH c2o,mo.m) e4o,l7ee4) om o12,67e.e4) cr2'Jm.(n) (312,t7ee4) em.m) (31287994) (66.751 40) (?E6,94E.34) o.(D (286,94t 3,1) 0.m (286,948.X) O0 (301,946.3O 0q) 0(l) 0m o.m om 0.m 0m om 0(x) 0.m 0.00 0m 0.(n 0.m 0.@ 0.m o(x) (61t@.01) om (62,102.0.t) 0.u) (62,10104) 0.m (6110201) o.m (62,rir.o{) om (62,102 04) 0.o (62,10104) 0.m (61102.04) 0.m 15,220.A) Om 35,220.61) 0m 35.720.& 0.m 35,22060 0.@ 0.m 0.@ 0m 0.o o0o 0.0 0.s 980,238 06 412.066.E7 (tr7,o11t2l z1+4n.e1 057,590.90) G6,5el.0, (361,060 m)_gI:lgl]l {sx37f,.59 26,857.86 (ll?,08.12) em,233.04) (230,000.90) (564,502.04) <361269.6) !rnX*X#X*# 147.564.1t 3,589,283.06 (96411-21) 4,014,565.16 4253t2.10 1.649,576.X (365,0t8.96' 4,@3,5m.36 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Attachment F. Public Correspondence001 (8510 : PUDR PL20180002020 - Esplande Golf & Country Club) 04/18/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.2 Item Summary: PL20170000768: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as the Baumgarten MPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 400 multifamily and/or townhouse residential dwelling units and up to 140 hotel/motel rooms and up to 370,000 square feet of commercial land uses at the southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard, in Section 26, Township 48, Range 26, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 55.66+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner, AICP, PLA] Meeting Date: 04/18/2019 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Nancy Gundlach 03/29/2019 4:59 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 03/29/2019 4:59 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 04/01/2019 11:21 AM Zoning Camden Smith Review Item Completed 04/01/2019 4:01 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 04/01/2019 5:57 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Review item Completed 04/02/2019 3:38 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 04/02/2019 4:00 PM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 04/05/2019 12:07 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Review Item Completed 04/09/2019 1:49 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 04/18/2019 9:00 AM 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 423 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.aPacket Pg. 425Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.aPacket Pg. 426Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Baumgarten MPUD Staff Report -signed.pdf 4-8-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 455Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 456Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 460Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Attachment A - Ordinance - 040919 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.c Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Attachment B - Page 9 of 11 of Letter dated March 12, 2019 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 1 of 5 Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA # 1244, Principal Planner Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: March 20, 2019 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ – PL20170000768 - REV 5 PETITION NAME: Baumgarten (formerly Pelican Nursery) MPUD Rezone REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting to rezone approximately ±55.66-acres from “A” - Agriculture Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District to allow for a maximum of 400 residential dwelling units (multi-family and townhouses) and up to a maximum of 370,000 square feet of gross commercial floor area and 140 hotel/motel rooms. The petitioner is requesting deviations for street width from 60’ to 50’ on the easement or Right-of-Way for the bypass drive and a couple of deviations on signage. Submittal 3 revised the requested deviations, the Statement of Utility Provisions, and the Master Plan. Submittal 4 revised the TIS. Submittal 5 revised TIS, PUD Commitments, and the notes on Master Plan. LOCATION: The subject site is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Blvd. (CR 951) in Section 26, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: Approximately 36 acres of the subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center #3; the remaining approximately 19.66 acres of the subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The FLUE states the following: “The purpose of the Urban Residential Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. Maximum eligible residential density shall be determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the Land Development Code.” The FLUE also states the following: “Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to provide for concentrated commercial and mixed use development, but with carefully configured access to the road network. The Mixed-Use Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate almost all new commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Attachment C - Consistency Review.docx 3-20-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 5 commercial development, and to create focal points within the community. Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to be mixed-use in character. Further, they are generally intended to be developed at a human- scale, to be pedestrian-oriented, and to be interconnected with abutting projects – whether commercial or residential. Street, pedestrian pathway and bike lane interconnections with abutting properties, where possible and practicable, are encouraged. Allowable land uses in Mixed Use Activity Centers include the full array of commercial uses (C1-C5), residential uses, institutional uses, hotel/motel uses at a maximum density of 26 units per acre, community facilities, and other land uses as generally allowed in the Urban designation.” The Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict contains a number of factors to be considered during review of a rezone petition; these are listed below and followed by staff analysis in italics. a) Rezones are encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. There shall be no minimum, acreage limitation for such Planned Unit Developments except all requests for rezoning must meet the requirements for rezoning in the Land Development Code. The petition is for a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. b) Amount, type, and location of existing zoned commercial land, and developed commercial uses, both within the Mixed Use Activity Center (MUAC), and within two (2) road miles of the MUAC. Project is located in the southeast quadrant of Immokalee Rd. and Collier Blvd. There are zoned and developed commercial uses within the boundaries of Activity Center (AC) #3. Approximately 2 miles to the west of the subject property in the southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and Logan Blvd., there is an approved development for a 100,000 sq. ft. shopping center, which is presently under construction. There are no commercial uses located east of the subject property within 2 miles. Approximately two miles to the south, in the northwest quadrant of Collier Blvd. and Vanderbilt Beach Road, there is commercial zoning and development (shopping center). The applicant provided a chart (Exhibit ‘3’ Evaluation Criteria) breaking down the commercial development within 2 miles. c) Market demand and service area for the proposed commercial land uses to be used as a guide to explore the feasibility of the requested land uses. The site is located at a major road intersection which provides arterial road access to the site for both north/south and east/west traffic volumes. A large volume of the vehicle trips can be captured as pass-by trips. There are numerous residential communities located in the surrounding area with several thousand residents, which can be served by the commercial development. d) Existing patterns of land use within the Mixed Use Activity Center and within two (2) radial miles. Current patterns of land use within the MUAC #3 include commercial, preserve and undeveloped land; approved land uses include commercial, preserve, mixed use and residential uses. The patterns of land uses within 2 miles of the MUAC #3 include predominantly residential uses with a few commercial and agricultural uses scattered throughout. e) Adequacy of infrastructure capacity, particularly roads. The applicant stated the site has access to water, sewer, and other public services which have capacity to serve the proposed development. The application included a Collier County Utility Dedication Statement, that stated that the developer agrees to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to Collier County Utilities and to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer system. The Traffic Impact Study states, “There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service.” f) Compatibility of the proposed development with, and adequacy of buffering for, adjoining properties. Comprehensive Planning Staff defers to Zoning Services Staff for compatibility review. 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Attachment C - Consistency Review.docx 3-20-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 3 of 5 g) Natural or man-made constraints. There are no man-made or natural constraints that prohibit development of the site as currently zoned (A, Rural Agricultural). h) Rezoning criteria identified in the Land Development Code. Comprehensive Planning Staff defers to the Zoning Services Section for this analysis. i) Conformance with Access Management Plan provisions for Mixed Use Activity Centers, as contained in the Land Development Code. Comprehensive Planning Staff defers to Transportation Planning Staff for this review. j) Coordinated traffic flow on-site and off-site, as may be demonstrated by a Traffic Impact Analysis, and a site plan/master plan indicating on-site traffic movements, access point locations and type, median opening locations and type on the abutting roadway(s), location of traffic signals on the abutting roadway(s), and internal and external vehicular and pedestrian interconnections. Comprehensive Planning Staff defers to Transportation Planning Staff and Zoning Services Staff for this review. k) Interconnection(s) for pedestrians, bicycles and motor vehicles with existing and future abutting projects. Access to abutting gated communities to the east and south are not feasible, since these communities are significantly developed or built-out at this time. Sidewalk interconnections will be available. l) Conformance with the architectural design standards as identified in the Land Development Code. No deviations from the County’s architectural design guidelines are proposed with the petition. Mixed Use Activity Center #3 qualifies as a Master Planned Activity Center (as the petitioner controls the entire quadrant), which allows the boundary of the activity center to be reconfigured through the zoning process, so long as permitted commercial development area will not exceed the maximum of 40 acres for this quadrant of the activity center. The FLUE states, “The boundaries of Mixed Use Activity Centers have been delineated on the maps located at the end of this section as part of the Future Land Use Map Series. These map boundaries are the actual, fixed boundaries and cannot be adjusted without a comprehensive plan amendment, except as provided below for Master Planned Activity Centers… The maximum amount of commercial uses allowed at Activity Center # 3 (Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard) is 40 acres per quadrant for a total of 160 acres maximum in the entire Activity Center; the balance of the land area shall be limited to non-commercial uses as allowed in Mixed Use Activity Centers.” This MPUD is proposed for the entire southeast quadrant. The Conceptual MPUD Master Plan, Exhibit ‘C-1’, indicates the petitioner proposes to re-configure the MUAC #3 southeast quadrant to extend east to the boundary with Bent Creek Preserves PUD, and to only extend the southern boundary of the MUAC to the northern edge of two lakes proposed that will serve this MPUD. The PUD boundary will continue southward to include the proposed residential tracts and two lakes, but they will not be included in the MUAC. (See PUD Master Plan for revised Activity Center boundary). The result is that the ±36 acres of land owned by the petitioner within the MUAC is reconfigured as is the ±4 acres of road and canal rights-of way along Immokalee Road and Collier Blvd. Staff reviewed the proposed land use for consistency with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The FLUE states, “The Urban area will accommodate residential uses and a variety of non- residential uses…Mixed-use developments – whether consisting of residential units located above commercial uses, in an attached building, or in a freestanding building – are allowed and encouraged within Mixed Use Activity Centers. Density for such a project is calculated based upon the gross project acreage within the Activity Center.” The petitioner is requesting a maximum of 400 dwelling units on ±55.66 gross. The southeast quadrant of the Mixed Use Activity Center (MUAC) #3 equal approximately 40 acres of which a portion is Right-Of- Way for Immokalee Rd. and Collier Blvd. The FLUE states, “If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed-Use Activity Center which is not within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Attachment C - Consistency Review.docx 3-20-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 4 of 5 and is not within the Coastal High Hazard Area, the eligible density is sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre.” Approximately 36 acres of this project are located within the Mixed-Use Activity Center #3 and eligible for a density of 16 residential dwelling units per acre (DU/A), which would be approximately 576 DUs (16 DU/A * 36.0 A = 576 DUs). Hotel/motels are permitted within the MUAC at a maximum density of 26 units per acre. Because approximately 36 acres of this project are located within the Mixed-Use Activity Center #3 and eligible for a density of 26 hotel/motel units (rooms) per acre, this site would be eligible for a maximum of 936 Units (26 rooms * 36.0 A = 936 Units); however, the applicant is proposing a maximum of 140 units for hotel/motel use. The remaining approximately 19.66 acres of the subject site are contained within the MUAC Density Band. A base density of 4 residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed in Urban designated areas, though not an entitlement. If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. Therefore, the other 19.66 acres are eligible for a residential density of 7 DU/A (4 DU/A + 3 DU/A = 7 DU/A), which would be approximately 138 DUs. The total eligible density for the MPUD is 714 dwelling units, of which the applicant is proposing a maximum of 400 DUs. Although the petition’s proposed maximum of 400 DUs is consistent with the density rating system and MUAC designation, the FLUE provides that the final determination of permitted density is made by the Board of County Commissioners. Select FLUE Policies are given below, followed with [bracketed staff analysis]. FLUE Policy 5.4 states: “New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended).” [It is the responsibility of the Zoning Services staff, as part of their review of the petition in its entirety, to perform the compatibility analysis.] FLUE Policy 7.1 states: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The Conceptual MPUD Master Plan, Exhibit ‘C-1’, shows one ingress/egress access on Collier Blvd. (CR 951) and two ingress/egress accesses on Immokalee Rd. (CR 846), which are both arterial roads as identified in the Transportation Element of the GMP.] FLUE Policy 7.2 states: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit ‘C-1’, Conceptual MPUD Master Plan, shows one main road within the project that tie the residential, commercial and commercial/residential sections of the project together . Internal access will be provided.] FLUE Policy 7.3 states: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [Exhibit ‘C-1’, MPUD Master Plan, shows potential interconnections with adjoining developments to the east (Bent Creek Preserves), and a potential egress from Tuscany Cove PUD, to the south. Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) adjoins the northern boundary and Collier Blvd. (CR 951) adjoins the western boundary of the subject site.] 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Attachment C - Consistency Review.docx 3-20-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Zoning Division ● 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ● Naples, FL 34104 ● 239-252-2400 Page 5 of 5 FLUE Policy 7.4 states: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [Exhibit “A” Permitted Uses, Residential A. Principal Uses #1 lists Multi-family and Townhouses. Exhibit E Cross Section shows 5’ concrete sidewalks on both sides of the r oad and no deviation was requested for sidewalks. A number of allowable common open space uses and structures to serve residents and their guests are itemized in Exhibit “A” Residential: B. Accessory Uses #4 and in Amenity Area: A. Principal Uses, #1. Frequently common buildings, such as a clubhouse (listed as a Principal Use #1 in the A. Amenity Area) are used for civic facilities.] CONCLUSION This rezone petition may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section PUDZ-PL2017-0768 Baumgarten R5.docx 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Attachment C - Consistency Review.docx 3-20-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) . ‒ 1 ‒ PETITION: PL2017-0768, MPUD Baumgarten MPUD, aka. Pelican Nursery MPUD 3-21-2019, revised: 3-29-19 STAFF MEMO COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, Transportation Planning Section HEARING DATE: CCPC April 18, 2019, BCC May 14, 2019 SUBJECT: PETITION: PL2017-0768, MPUD Growth Management Plan (GMP) Consistency Findings, Transportation Element. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER FOR THE PETITION: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, Florida 34110 239-566-9551 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property comprises approximately +/-56 acres and is located in the southeast quadrant of the Immokalee Road (CR846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) intersection, in Section 26, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. Subject property 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Attachment D - Transportation GMP Memo 4-2-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) . ‒ 2 ‒ PETITION: PL2017-0768, MPUD Baumgarten MPUD, aka. Pelican Nursery MPUD 3-21-2019, revised: 3-29-19 REQUESTED ACTION: This request is seeking a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) rezone approval. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposed development is approximately +/- 56 acres in size and located at the southeast corner of the Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard intersection in Collier County, Florida. The request according to the proposed PUD is to allow the development of approximately 400 multi-family residential units, approximately 370,000 square feet of commercial uses, and approximately 140 hotel rooms on the subject parcel. STAFF ANALYSIS: GMP TRANSPORTATION ELEMENTS AND STAFF FINDINGS Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicants Traffic Impact Statement dated March 11, 2019, for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then applicable 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the PUD provided with the proposed rezoning the applicant is requesting a maximum of 400 multi-family residential dwelling units, 370,000 square feet of gross commercial floor area and 140 hotel-motel rooms. The TIS provided with this petition however outlines two potential development scenarios to address the proposed development requested in 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Attachment D - Transportation GMP Memo 4-2-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) . ‒ 3 ‒ PETITION: PL2017-0768, MPUD Baumgarten MPUD, aka. Pelican Nursery MPUD 3-21-2019, revised: 3-29-19 the PUD. Specifically, scenario one outlines a potential development that accounts for the proposed residential dwelling units, the hotel-motel use and splits the total commercial square footage between standard commercial uses with 90,000 square feet of mini-storage. The second scenario also accounts for the residential and hotel-model uses but limits total commercial use square footage to 201,000 square feet. There are also other minor use and square footage differences between the two scenarios. Staff has evaluated the TIS and agrees that the two scenario’s present accurate trip generation calculations, reasonable trip distribution on the surrounding network and reflect reasonable development potentials possible with the proposed PUD. While the two development scenarios do not fully represent the highest best use possible in the PUD both do result in lower traffic generation and in the case of scenario 2 it provides a lower total trip cap commitment by the developer in PUD Exhibit F, 4a, Transportation. Transportation Planning Staff also has following conditions of approval for this petition: Condition of approval: The companion Developer Agreement is required to be approved with this rezoning request. According to the current 2018 AUIR Immokalee Road from Logan Boulevard to Collier Boulevard has a current service volume of 3,200 trips and a remaining capacity of approximately 188 trips and is currently operating at LOS “D”. Immokalee Road from Collier Boulevard to Wilson Boulevard has a current service volume of 3,300 trips and a remaining capacity of approximately 681 trips and is currently operating at LOS “D”. Also, according to the 2018 AUIR Collier Boulevard from Vanderbilt Beach Road to Immokalee Road has a current service volume of 3,000 trips and a remaining capacity of approximately 580 trips and is currently operating at LOS “C”. Based on the information provided in the TIS for either scenario for this petition the subject roadway links have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project within the 5-year planning period. Policy 7.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as may be amended to ensure the protection of the arterial and collector system’s capacity and integrity.” Staff finding: The development is proposing one access signalized access on Collier Boulevard and on Immokalee Road the development proposed two access points, the western access will be a right-in only and the eastern access will be a right-in, right-out only access. The TIS provide with this petition contains intersection analysis for the existing signalized intersection of Immokalee and Collier which indicates that the requested signal on Collier in this request can coordinated with the existing signal on Immokalee and be reasonably operated. The two proposed limited access points on Immokalee meet reasonable access management minimum standards. The Access Management Resolution 13-257 represents desirable requirements, the ultimate goal is to exceed these standards. Staff recommends approval of the proposed access points shown on the master plan for this rezone. Policy 7.3 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Attachment D - Transportation GMP Memo 4-2-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) . ‒ 4 ‒ PETITION: PL2017-0768, MPUD Baumgarten MPUD, aka. Pelican Nursery MPUD 3-21-2019, revised: 3-29-19 “The County shall implement, through its Land Development Code and Code of Laws and Ordinances, the provision of safe and convenient onsite traffic flow and need for adequate parking for both motorized and non-motorized vehicles as a primary objective in the review of Planned Unit Developments, Site Development Plan, and other appropriate stages of review in the land development application review process. Coordination shall occur with County Engineering staff where traffic circulation is outside the limits of the public ROW.” Staff finding: The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project as noted above. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets.” Staff finding: The proposed developments master plan shows two potential-future interconnections to adjacent developed residential projects to the east and south. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed development can be found consistent with this policy. Policy 9.5 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, “The County shall encourage projects which provide local resident, pedestrian, bicyclist and motorist movement between and among developments on neighborhood streets in a deliberate balance with its efforts to route cut-through traffic away from neighborhoods and to the arterials and collectors designated in the Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan.” Staff finding: As noted above in Policy 9.3 the proposed master plan indicates interconnects between residential uses to the developed residential projects to the east and south. Therefore, the proposed development is found consistent with this policy. Existing Roadway Conditions: Roadway Link 2018 AUIR Existing LOS Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Service 2018 AUIR Remaining Capacity 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Attachment D - Transportation GMP Memo 4-2-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) . ‒ 5 ‒ PETITION: PL2017-0768, MPUD Baumgarten MPUD, aka. Pelican Nursery MPUD 3-21-2019, revised: 3-29-19 Volume/Peak Direction Immokalee Road Logan Boulevard to Collier Boulevard D 3,200/East 188 Immokalee Road Collier Boulevard to Wilson Boulevard D 3,300/East 681 Collier Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road to Immokalee Road C 3,500/North 773 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Transportation staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP with the proposed Transportation Planning Staff conditions of approval and therefore approves the Baumgarten MPUD PL20170000768, and further recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forwards Petition PL20170000768 to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval with the following condition of approval: Condition of approval: The companion Developer Agreement is required to be approved with this rezoning request. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Attachment D - Transportation GMP Memo 4-2-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 1 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IN RE: BAUMGARTEN PUD (PELICAN NURSERY) RECORDED PUBLIC MEETING ON OCTOBER 16, 2018 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 2 of 54 (Recorded meeting as follows:) MR. ARNOLD: All right. We're ready to go. So my name is Wayne Arnold and I'm with Grady Minor Engineering. This is Sharon Umpenhour. She's also with our firm. She sent out the mail notices and will be recording the meeting. So our project team consists of Rich Yovanovich, he's our counsel and Norm Trebilcock who is our transportation engineer. We have David Genson and Dan Waters both from Barron Collier Companies who are under contract to purchase this property. And Nancy Gunlach who is over here ready to play the piano is from Collier County staff. She's a principal planner and she's handling our cases that go through the county commission process. So this process that we're in (inaudible) on this project almost a year ago and we basically came just to the point where we thought that we should probably re-engage with the community and tell you some of the changes we made, updates and where we are in the process. And then as you'll be able to follow the progress through the project. So the project, as I'm sure you're aware, is about 56 acres. It's located at the southeast quadrant of Collier Boulevard and Immokalee Road. And this (inaudible) which Collier County designated for a mixture of uses, some very intense commercial uses and higher density multi-family uses. We're proposing that this is a mix use project. And 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 3 of 54 the master plan is up here. We call it a conceptual diagram. There are no specific building plans yet. There's not specific end users yet so this is really a more conceptual zoning process that we're going to share you. And you can see on the project R designations which highlight residential areas. And we have C areas which designate where commercial can go. And we have one tract on the eastern side of the project which could be commercial, residential or a mixture of those uses. But our proposal that's going through the zoning process we're asking for 400 multi-family dwelling units, 370,000 square feet of commercial uses and 140 units for hotel uses on the property. And we've asked for multi-family dwelling units which the county considers those to be three or more attached units or townhouse development. There's not a single family component proposed through the project. And the county asked us to establish development standards for the project. And our plan identifies (inaudible). The primary highlights of the master plan we have two proposed access points on Immokalee Road and we have one access point on Collier Boulevard. We originally met with the representatives of Tuscany Cove, our neighbors to the south. And we made provisions for a potential interconnect which would be an 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 4 of 54 egress site access point. We also added a potential connection to Bent Creek and that area is highlighted to the eastern side of our project. And if you live in Tuscany Cover and are here, your community actually built this out on your northern property line to contemplate potentially connect. Although it's been a nursery for many years -- MR. CLARK: We can't hear you. MR. ARNOLD: I'll try to speak up. Thank you. But the process that we're in is considered a rezoning. So we're taking the project from it's agriculture zoning today to allow it to have a mixture of uses of what we're proposing. And we are in the sufficiency review process which means we've submitted to the county. They've reviewed our plans a couple times. They've made what I think are some pretty minor revisions that we owe them in the next few weeks. And then hopefully after the next couple 30 or 45 days they will find our application sufficient. And at that point, they'll schedule us for public hearings. We're required to hold two public hearings. One would be before the Collier County planning commission and they hear the item. They make a recommendation to the county commission. And then the county commissioners hear this item and they vote on it and we're required to get four out of five votes of our county commissioners to approve the zoning change on the project. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 5 of 54 So the process tonight that you're here for is really for us to share with you what's going on near you and answer any questions you may have as we simply can. Again, like I said, we don't have detailed building plans yet. This very much conceptual zoning exercise at this point. But our team is here to answer questions that you might have. And I would estimate that we hope to be through the process of public hearings sometime early in 2019 at this point. MR. YOVANOVICH: Wayne, you might want to mention we're an activity center. MR. ARNOLD: I'll reaffirm. We're an activity center which I think I mentioned that early on. But the activity center designation allows us to have a mixture of uses at higher densities than you find elsewhere in the community. And the county established those about 20 years ago now. And has tried to focus the higher density and higher intensities of commercial uses at those intersections where they can better manage and coordinate all quadrants of those intersections. So how you have -- how many do we have in the county? We have 19, 16, 17. There are a number of them. We lost a couple of them when Marco Island incorporated, but the county has these. You find them at 41 and Immokalee Road for instance is another one west of here. They have 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 6 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 them at I-75 and Immokalee Road as well. So that's the process we're in. This is our request. And I think with that, I'll turn it over and ask questions. Just a couple of rules of order. The county requires us to record these. And the planning commission members have asked us to make sure that the questions that are asked get on the record clearly. So Sharon will do the best to record that. I may repeat that. You're not required necessarily to give your name if you don't want to. It's helpful if you do just to distinguish the public from our developer team that's here. So with that, I'll turn it over for questions. And I'll start right here with this lady in the front. You want me to give you a microphone. How about that? AUDIENCE (PAULA): My name is Paula. I live in The Quarry. And I was wondering what your plans were for the horrendous traffic that's going to come through here? MR. ARNOLD: The question was regarding traffic. AUDIENCE: You have to hold the mike like pretend you're Mick Jagger. That's how have to hold that mike. MR. ARNOLD: The county requires us to do an extensive traffic analysis, which it's called a traffic impact statement. Norm Trebilcock has prepared that 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 7 of 54 1 2 analysis and is working with staff. One of the things that the county staff will require that we do is establish a trip 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 cap. So they will establish a maximum PO, a trip that we can do. So any of these combination of uses that we've proposed will be subject to a trip cap that we have to establish trip caps and counts at the time we come in for final development order so we can ensure that we're not exceeding the trip cap that the county imposes on us. AUDIENCE: What's that? What's a trip cap? MR. ARNOLD: Norm, you want to explain in general what a trip cap is? Try to in layman terms if that's okay. MR. TREBILCOCK: Good evening. Again, my name is Norman Trebilcock with the firm of Trebilcock Consulting Solutions. I'm a professional engineer and certified planner. I've been in the area since 1990 and we prepared the traffic impact statement. So just to answer the question what a trip cap is what we do is we use -- we work with the county. There's a manual called the Institute of Transportation Engineers that has established trip generation for different land uses: Residential, a hotel and the other commercial uses. And so you look at all those trips that they've generated and you also look at some other things, things called passby where somebody might be already on the road network and passing by and then they call also internal 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 8 of 54 capture. That's the idea of mixed use where you may not generate an external trip if you live in a community and go do the shopping right there you don't really get on the network. So ultimately what happens is we identify what are going to be the trips generated from the project with these land uses we're proposing. And based on that, the county will establish a trip cap basically saying that you won't exceed this number of trips generated externally from the project when the project ultimately develops. So that's what was in turn is what we call trip cap. And then we evaluate our traffic impacts on the road network based on the trip generation. Also, the county keeps track of the traffic, the background traffic around the community. And so they have that as an established background. And then what we'll do is we'll look at how that background traffic is going to grow over the years whether oncoming projects or whatever. And then we add our project traffic onto that to determine to see what the impacts are to make sure that the system doesn't fail. In addition, on this project what the county has asked us to do, too, what we've done is we looked at that major intersection of Immokalee and Collier Boulevard and we actually did a traffic count during season. And then we 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 9 of 54 grow that traffic and then we'll run analysis of the signalized intersection with our traffic being added on there. So that's some of the analysis. So hopefully I answered your question. I probably went a little beyond it, but to try to give you at least an understanding of what we do and then we're working with the county evaluating that traffic analysis as well. MR. ARNOLD: I saw a question right here. Yes, sir? AUDIENCE: Where you have the residential areas marked off, can you give a description of what type of buildings they would be in terms of design and where would the hotel be with respect to the residential areas? MR. ARNOLD: The question related to what type of residential buildings. And we are proposing multi-family or townhomes, which under the county's definition a multi-family unit is three or more attached unit s. So if you live in a condominium, you live in what they consider a multi-family housing unit. The county also considers apartments to be multi-family housing. And then townhomes are different because they're -- you own fee simple the land beneath your unit and you own a vertical piece of that. AUDIENCE: How high up? MR. ARNOLD: Let me get to the heights in just a second. I've got a table. I want to make sure I don't 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 10 of 54 1 2 misstate. But we don't have specific designs for those. But the residential tracts are in our southern boundary. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 And then the hotel question would be it's allowed in any of the commercial tracts. So anything that's designated C or the CR tract would allow a hotel use, but it could not be along the southern boundary. MR. TREBILCOCK: You've got a question over here. MR. ARNOLD: Let me answer the question on heights. I don't have my glasses on, but I think I can read it. So for the residential component, we are proposing multi-family buildings that would have a zone height of 55 feet and a natural height of 65 feet. And the zoning versus actual the county establishes two different ways to measure height. The zoning height is essentially to a mid point of a roof, for instance. The actual height is measured to the highest point of any part of that building. So they require us to establish two heights. The townhomes we're proposing would have a zone height of 45 feet and an actual height of 50 feet. Another question over here. AUDIENCE: Back to traffic when you were talking about your trip test, I know you're talking about the corner of Immokalee and Collier. Does that go all the way down to 111? Because that's where you get the congestion. I mean, they're talking about putting a 420 unit apartment building on Livingston. They just put an apartment building across 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 11 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the street from Pebble Brook. I mean, are all of these things taken into consideration with the traffic? MR. ARNOLD: Okay. Yes, I believe the question was about the trip generation or the traffic analysis to make sure this goes beyond just this major intersection. AUDIENCE: Right. MR. ARNOLD: And yes, sir, what we do is we'll look at what we call different lengths of roadway and where we have an influence, a certain percentage of the traffic link we'll look at those lanes. So along Immokalee Road they'll continue to go down to various sections of Immokalee. And we'll also go down Collier Boulevard as well and then look at Immokalee Road to the east. So they'll look at these different segments and make sure that the level of service will be still sufficient. AUDIENCE: Right. Also, between six in the morning and nine in the morning and three afternoon until six p.m. it's a parking lot. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir. Thank you. AUDIENCE: One other question. MR. ARNOLD: Hang on one second. AUDIENCE: Do you know what the rentals will be on those properties, what the cost of the rent? MR. ARNOLD: I don't think that's been established. It would be hard to rate. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 12 of 54 AUDIENCE: Okay. Are these luxury apartments or are they low income? MR. ARNOLD: They're not low income housing. But I don't know if they're going to be considered market rate or they'll be considered luxury, but we're not proposing low income housing. AUDIENCE: Right. Because the county keeps saying they need affordable housing, affordable housing. I was just wondering what the rental was. AUDIENCE: I still have a question over here. MR. ARNOLD: Hang on one second, sir. There was a follow-up question on the building height question. And the question was what is the proposed height of the hotel? And the height that we're proposing for the hotel and commercial buildings or office buildings of the hotel are 55 foot zoned height and a 65 feet actual height. Any retail buildings -- AUDIENCE: Is that five stories, four stories? MR. ARNOLD: Ma'am, one at a time, please. We're trying to record the meeting, please. The retail buildings have a zoned height of 45 feet and an actual height of 65 feet. So we don't establish number of stories typically. The county asks us to deal with that in terms of feet. Yes, sir? AUDIENCE: So to the best of your ability in terms of getting approved for the development with the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 13 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 county, if you get into an ideal scenario when do you think that this project would get off the ground? And how would that coincide with the Vanderbilt extension? Because I've talked to a couple of county officials already who have labeled Immokalee in a failure state meaning it's too congested as it is. MR. ARNOLD: Well, we don't have a definitive time frame for when this goes to construction because we don't know exactly when we're going to get out of this particular process. But we would expect to hopefully get through this successfully sometime in early 2019 which would probably mean that we could be breaking ground in 2019. I don't know about Vanderbilt extension. Norm, is that something that you know time-wise? I have no idea. MR. TREBILCOCK: Nothing specific. AUDIENCE: It would be about two years after they started. MR. ARNOLD: I don't think we know the exact time frame for that. AUDIENCE: Well, it might not be exact, but this is what county officials have estimated themselves. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. All right. Thank you. A question from the gentleman in the red shirt? AUDIENCE: Yeah, I don't need the microphone. You referred to the two access roads from the two 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 14 of 54 developments. And you used some engineering lingo that I wasn't familiar with. Could you tell me, tell us what type of access? Who's building it and is there any security? MR. ARNOLD: Well, the details we don't have because we just started this conversation. But we have shown potential interconnections with both Bent Creek and Tuscany Cove. And the county encourages us to have interconnections. And we call them potential because we can't force an interconnection on your property. And likewise, you couldn't necessarily impose one on ours. But the county won't let us mutually work out an agreement to share any kind of access unless we show them on our conceptual plans. So we show those potential access points. We had a conversation with the representative of Tuscany Cove some months ago. There's a good potential that we would have a signalized intersection on our southern access point on Collier Boulevard. They like the idea of potentially having an egress only into our community. I know that Mr. Genson had some preliminary discussions with the developer at Bent Creek and we agreed to at least conceptually show an interconnection on our plan not knowing what, if anything, that may materialize into. AUDIENCE: What is an egress access point? MR. ARNOLD: Egress means you can go one way. And 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 15 of 54 that means Tuscany could egress into our property, but they could not ingress back into theirs. AUDIENCE: Thank you. MR. ARNOLD: Sure. Ma'am near the back? AUDIENCE: Could you please just speak to the connections on Immokalee Road. Do you have plans for lights when you exit out of your complex? MR. ARNOLD: The question was do we have lights for exiting out of the complex? And I think the answer is on Immokalee Road we're not projected to have a traffic signal. I know you may not like the answer, but if we could try to be respectful of everybody's time. Yes, sir, you had your hand up? MS. UMPENHOUR: Lady in the back. In the back, lady in the back. AUDIENCE: My understanding was that this is zoned commercial and that you needed to have a rezoning request in to put in the residential. Is that not correct? MR. ARNOLD: Right now the entire property is zoned agriculture and this is for the nursery that had been in existence there for 20 plus years. So all of the property has to be rezoned to allow it to have higher density residential or any of the commercial uses. But all of its in what's considered it's a master planned activity center. And it encourages us to have a mixed us that allows us to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 16 of 54 have up to 16 units per acre, which we're under that threshold. So from the county's planning perspective we're on the right track with what we're proposing and we're going through that review process to change the zoning to a planned development to allow our mix of uses. Yes, sir in the back? AUDIENCE: If I understand that, you're saying the zoning changes layout, you guys you got that all kind of laid out. An that type of question isn't even going to be -- I mean, you've got your master plan. I mean, to the uninitiated, you know, you're go ahead with all of this and you don't even have the zoning approved. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense. MR. ARNOLD: Well, the question relates to the zoning process and this is the process of zoning the land. We're going through the public hearing process to change the zoning to allow it to be what we need to develop as I've described. The zoning today does not permit what we're trying to do. AUDIENCE: Just to follow up. The multi-family or whatever rental over here, am I understanding that these will definitely be rental units? They will not be condominiums or townhomes? They would be rental units? MR. ARNOLD: We have not distinguished whether or not they're going to be rentals or condominiums. They could 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 17 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 be both. And distinction the reason I say townhome, the county considers a townhouse to be a different type of unit than a typical multi-family condo that some of us may live in because of the ownership aspect of it. So we've asked for a multi-family or townhouse. AUDIENCE: And where I'm from, a townhouse is two stories. Bedrooms upstairs and living downstairs is a townhouse. MR. ARNOLD: Correct, yeah. The gentleman standing right behind you. AUDIENCE: I understand it's a conceptual plan and I understand (inaudible) for the zoning. How many more times could the public either in site plan review or any other time get a look at this plan before it goes forward? MR. ARNOLD: The question relates to how many more times the public gets to review this plan. And there will be at least two public hearings following our neighborhood meeting tonight. The first one would be before the Collier County planning commission and sometimes they hear these on one day. Sometimes it gets continued to another day. So I say at least one. And then they make a recommendation. And the next public hearing would go to the Collier County commission. AUDIENCE: And how detailed is that? Is that site plan review? 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 18 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. ARNOLD: No. That's still the same conceptual evaluation. AUDIENCE: When does -- when do you tie down the details? When do you really talk about the egress and ingress and you really have to talk about the site as to what you're going to develop? Does anybody look at that? MR. ARNOLD: The question relates to when do we have to get into the more detailed review. And the county for its process this is called conceptual PUD master plan. It's meant to be conceptual. We haven't worked out all the details of what the buildings arrangement on the site would be, et cetera. We don't know the final tenants that might be in a location. So the real site plan review occurs after the public hearing and the county has hundreds of staff people to look at land development. AUDIENCE: (Inaudible)? MR. ARNOLD: That's correct. The review at the site plan level is the staff. AUDIENCE: Okay, thank you. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir in the back? AUDIENCE: I understand what you're saying about the conceptual. Having said that, are you looking at boutique hotel, upscale shops or are we looking at Janden housing and strip stores? MR. ARNOLD: Well, the question is, you know, 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 19 of 54 again, relates to the detail and I don't think we know that yet. I know that when we first got involved in this project there was a lot of talk that there might be a large scale hardware store going here which obviously takes up a lot more square footage and changes the figuration over what might be there if you had a series of strip stores. AUDIENCE: But you have absolutely no idea going forward? MR. ARNOLD: At this point we do not. Yes, sir? I saw a question back here. Yes, sir? MR. TREBILCOCK: Go this way, Wayne. AUDIENCE: You've indicated that this has to go before a planning board where you need a majority vote? MR. ARNOLD: The planning commission is made up of nine members. And we need a simple majority vote for recommendation. It goes forward. If they chose to not support it, it still goes to the county commission. And the county commission is made up of five members. And we require four out of five votes for zoning approval for Collier County. AUDIENCE: Those are public meetings that the public wouldn't be allowed to speak at? MR. ARNOLD: They're absolutely public meetings. And there will be public notice signs posted on the site and there would be an advertisement in the newspaper. Yes, sir? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 20 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 AUDIENCE: Have the egress from Tuscany into your new project, has that been approved to go or is that still on their -- MR. ARNOLD: The question relates to the Tuscany egress and it is shown on our master plan. We haven't had a chance to evaluate it, but it shows in a general location where your access point has been set at. AUDIENCE: Thank you. MR. ARNOLD: Ma'am back here? AUDIENCE: Yes, could you please tell me who again is here from the county and what their title is? MR. ARNOLD: Okay. From the county it's Nancy Gundlach and she's a principal planner with Collier County in the zoning department. And she's responsible for coordinating the review from the various departments of this application. She's sitting at the piano. AUDIENCE: Could you spell her last name, please? MR. ARNOLD: G-u-n-d-l-a-c-h. MS. GUNDLACH: Wayne, my cards are right on the table. MR. ARNOLD: Nancy put some of her business cards out on the sign-in table if you care to take one of those, too. It has her e-mail address and phone number on it. Sir? 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 21 of 54 1 2 3 AUDIENCE: Yes. So if I understand correctly, in the residential area and even in that commercial/residential area, you're going to have heights of 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 anywhere from 55 to 65 feet, 45 and 50 feet in those areas. And you've got neighbors to the south, Tuscany Cove. To the east Bent Creek Preserve. What kind of neighbors will you be as you tower over the people that live next to you? What kind of buffers would you conceptually plan? I know this is conceptual. But what would you plan? MR. ARNOLD: Well, the buffers that we show and we have to depict the minimum buffer requirements from the county's perspective on the plan. And right now it's a 15 foot wide type B buffer that's shown on the southern property boundary. And it probably doesn't mean anything in your nomenclature. But the county's type B buffer is 15 feet wide and requires trees spaced so many trees per 100 lineal feet. Twenty five feet on center and then it requires either a hedge or a wall or some capacity that's six feet in height. Ma'am in the back? AUDIENCE: Yeah, my name is Stella Ebson. I'm here from Bent Creek. And we try to get out from Bent Creek up to Immokalee. It's almost impossible. And you're saying you're going to put two more driveways out and they're going to all have to get over to the left-hand side and make a u-turn. How do you think we're going to do anything to get 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 22 of 54 out of our own subdivision? MR. ARNOLD: Well, one of things that's important for our traffic circulation is our access point on Collier Boulevard. It's shown on the far south boundary of our property. And that will allow our residents and customers who are exiting the site to gain access to Collier Boulevard and the signal at that location. Norm, I don't know if you want to elaborate on that? AUDIENCE: Excuse me. That's okay for getting out to Collier. I'm talking about getting out to Immokalee. There are people that are going to be going that way. I mean, you've got two -- how can you do that? And you've got to get over to the left to make a u-turn if you want to go back down Immokalee the other way, which I presume that's where you want people to come from, too. Well, what are the neighbors going to do in there? There's already accidents. There's been a death. I mean, excuse me, this is ridiculous. MR. ARNOLD: Well, again, part of what this plan is to have an access on Collier Boulevard so that folks that want to say they want to go west on Immokalee Road have that option available to them. I believe, too, there is a signal being proposed there at Woodcrest and Immokalee Road as well. So I think that may address some of the issues for your community down the road. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 23 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 AUDIENCE: But when? MR. ARNOLD: Yes, ma'am? AUDIENCE: Can you verify the number of residential units you say can go in here? MR. ARNOLD: Four hundred. AUDIENCE: Is it 400 times three? MR. ARNOLD: No, 400. AUDIENCE: Total? MR. ARNOLD: So 400 total, yes, ma'am. AUDIENCE: We live in Twin Eagles. Across from us they're planing to put in another 600 units. This stretch of roadway is amazingly dangerous right now. With the new strip mall there, with the culverts and the gas station, the u-turn situation is strikingly dangerous and it is way too crowded. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir in the back? AUDIENCE: My name is Mike (inaudible). If you go up Immokalee Road east up to (inaudible), they're supposed to be putting close to 10,000 residential units there. We've already had a death at the entrance of The Quarry because of traffic built-up and people making u-turns. The reason why you don't have a problem yet is because the county has already said you can't put a light on Immokalee unless it's a quarter of a mile from the corner of Collier County and Immokalee Road. Many of the people that 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 24 of 54 1 2 are in here have been to a number of meetings where we've had these discussions. They talked about flyovers over 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Collier Boulevard. How does that fit in? If you're going to go for a zoning, somebody really has to do an analysis over maybe a five to 10 year impact study to find out what impact 400 units would be on the communities. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir. So in terms of the traffic -- in terms of the traffic impacts, what we do is from a planning standpoint and the county provides background traffic that we start with. And in a planning study we do look at a five year -- I'm just going to answer your question if you can. So we look at a five year period and we grow that traffic. And the county also keeps tab of projects that have been approved. And so they'll put those trips on there as well in addition to the growth. And then we look at our traffic as well. So that is analyzed. AUDIENCE: (Inaudible) is we've sat -- many of us have sat at meetings with the county where they have addressed to us that if there's a serious problem on Immokalee Road with the excess traffic that's going to be building up. I'm not even talking about just adding what you're going to do with 400 units or whatever that number is. I really think that a part of the zoning process you really have to present not only what you're planning to do in there, but what the impact it is on all the communities 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 25 of 54 around there. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, we do. And there is a traffic study that's on file and that may be helpful to look at. But we do look at these different lengths of roadway to look at where we have a certain percentage of an impact and that gets identified. And then, also, you know, they look at mitigation of impacts. I mean, you mentioned the grade separated overpass. Many may have heard that or not. And that is something that's planned. That's why if you'll notice on Immokalee Road by the canal kind of meanders around so it's establish a footprint. And we're also helping the county establish that footprint on our property as well and work with the county for that so that eventually what would happen is Immokalee Road would fly over Collier Boulevard just in the same that you see at the intersection of Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway. It's the same concept. So it's all planned that way. And that's part of the reasoning of why the signal -- you know, ideally we would love to have a signal at our entrance there, but just the spacing of that unfortunately is too close with them doing the grade separated overpass. And so we would have what we call a directional median opening there. On the other hand, that's why we're looking to do a signal at Collier Boulevard there to kind of help that general area there function as well, too. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 26 of 54 AUDIENCE: When is the grade flyover to occur? MR. ARNOLD: I don't have a date for that. That's not really anything in your say five-year work program. AUDIENCE: 2020. We've already talked about it. MR. ARNOLD: If we could, could we please just one at a time. MR. ARNOLD: You've had your hand up for a while, ma'am? AUDIENCE: Hi. I really truly, truly appreciate your engineering skills and I really appreciate your studies. Here's the but. Please come out here and try to leave our subdivision Bent Creek or Quarry or any of them at 7:30 in the morning. Try to make the u-turn as they're flying down from Abbi Maria and all those other areas and live in our shoes for once. That's what we're talking about. It's dangerous. It's scary and it's a disaster waiting to happen. We've already had one young man that has died right there at Bent Creek and Woodcrest. And just please put the study aside, drive it and see what it's like. AUDIENCE: I want to change it up a little bit. The Baumgarten (inaudible) has been around. Originally, there was an instance where they were going to put a lovely home improvement center. I'm a resident at Bent Creek, by the way. So usually, home improvement centers are put in commercial areas. I just want to know is that still on the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 27 of 54 books? Because if it is, that's going to make a huge impact everyone for about three square miles around that area. It's just I'm a little concerned as a resident for that type of building to be built. MR. ARNOLD: Well, to respond, the question was a home improvement store at a commercial use. We've allowed in our plan for a wide variety of uses. Sort of C1 office all the way through C4 and some C5 commercial like home improvement store, but we don't know an end user. A lot of those large box retailers aren't expanding at this time. So we have to make provisions for them and others. So this is consistent with the county's comprehensive plan. This is where they've told us that we need the higher intensity uses so that's what we're following. We're consistent with those long-term plans for the county. AUDIENCE: A follow-up question on that. There was three scenarios given in the TIS and one still is the Home improvement center. The layout of that for zoning is actually would probably (inaudible). So I'm very much in support of scenarios two and three where you have a hotel or exclusively mixed use where you have home ownership with condos as well as rentals for that. It would a be a lot better for the community. MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. Yes, ma'am? AUDIENCE: I will not go to Publix between three 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 28 of 54 and six o'clock in the afternoon because you cannot get out of Publix because the traffic coming west on Immokalee does not stop. And I'm just wondering if it's feasible to put a traffic light somewhere west on Immokalee so at least you have some chance to get in and out of Publix. MR. ARNOLD: Well, on part of what the project is would be to have a signal on Collier Boulevard and it would be opposite Pebble Brook. So it would allow the traffic that wants to leave Pebble Brook to, in fact, use a signal instead of having Immokalee Road as the choice to get out on there. So it would allow you to be able to have a protective phasing movement there, a signal there. Okay. Yes, sir? AUDIENCE: I don't see -- two-part question. I don't see any open area or water retention area. And also, on the commercial areas, where would parking be? I don't see any evidence of a parking area. MR. ARNOLD: The question was water management areas on the site. And it's probably hard for many of you to see and feel free to come up and look after. But we've depicted two lakes that are between the residential and commercial tracts on our plan and those would be largely the water management. We have to put in water management that will be for water quality. There's some for attenuation and this is the conceptual location for those. And the parking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 29 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 areas would be dependent on the end user. If we ended up with a grocery anchored shopping center, it's probably going to look a parking field in front of the grocery store. If you have hotel parking, it's going to be around the hotel, et cetera. AUDIENCE: The commercial areas at the north end, what's the setback from Immokalee Road for those buildings? MR. ARNOLD: I'll check our element table we're proposing. I think 20 or 25 feet from Immokalee Road and that's a pretty standard setback for commercial uses. AUDIENCE: And where would their parking be? MR. ARNOLD: The parking is probably going to be similar to most other outparcel users that you would see along the corridor. They may have parking all the way around the building. Some of it may be only on the inside of the property. Again, don't know yet. We don't know the end user. Yes, sir? AUDIENCE: You mentioned at the beginning of your presentation that the Collier corporation had the first option on purchasing this land; is that correct? MR. ARNOLD: That's correct. I'm not sure what entity name they're under contract under to purchase it, but it's an affiliate of Barron Collier. AUDIENCE: The representative representing 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 30 of 54 Collier would like to make some comments on what their plan is as to develop the land if they purchase it? Are they going to sell it off to whoever wants to develop townhouses, whoever wants to put a big box store in? What's the major -- MR. ARNOLD: Well, I won't answer for Mr. Genson. But having worked with him a lot and they've developed many properties around Collier County over the years -- AUDIENCE: And we agree. MR. ARNOLD: They develop some. They joint venture with others. They've sold some of their properties. AUDIENCE: The Collier corporation is a plus to that corner, but we'd like to hear from him what's their plan. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. This is David Genson. I'll see if he can share a little bit more light on that. MR. GENSON: Thank you, everyone. As Wayne said, David Genson with Barron Collier. We look at this as a long term hold. We have over a million square feet of commercial property in Collier County today of which we own or control by ourselves or with joint venture partner. This proposed development is being done as a joint venture between Barron Collier and a firm, Metro Commercial which has other holdings in Naples, Florida, but they have the same mindset as us with respect to long-term holds. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 31 of 54 1 2 I can assure you that what we're proposing to do out here would be what I would call a class A development. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 It's not something that we're going to do that in any way would degrade the values of property around here. We think it will enhance it because of the access to now goods and services that typically maybe you can't get right in this area. You have to go further away to get. So we're being very selective with respect to who we're bringing in here. I can tell you right now that of the commercial parcels at least probably half of it is going to be built by us. It's not going to be sold. It's not going to be a land lease to someone. It's going to be built by this joint venture and held onto for specific uses out there. We're talking to medical providers right now. We have great plans for a retail, nice what we call a fashion center even though not related to fashion, but -- AUDIENCE: Like Mercato? MR. GENSON: Well, not like Mercato because Mercato is a mixed use where you have the residential above that. And you know, Barron Collier did not participate in the residential in Mercato. That was Lucker Companies that did that. We only did the commercial as a joint venture with them. So we're planning on a very nice commercial center there. I will tell you that we are talking to a hotel provider that's very interested in this area. We're also 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 32 of 54 talking to a grocer that's interested in this area. So we do have a lot of things lined up. But people are always asking us why don't we have the details? Why don't we have the details? Well, it's really hard to get anyone to sign on the dotted line to develop out here when you don't have zoning. So they want to be assured that we have our zoning in place before we can get some of that detail as to what you're talking about. But I will commit to you that this will be a nice development. And we will not -- we will not do anything to jeopardize your development or our name because our name is going to be on this for a long time. Yes, ma'am? AUDIENCE: Just one question. I think you said class A development. Is that what you called it? MR. GENSON: Yes. AUDIENCE: Could you give me an example of one of your class A developments, where it is? AUDIENCE: What it is? MR. GENSON: I would say there's a few. We just opened up Creekside Corners at the intersection of Goodlette Road and Immokalee Road right across from the hospital. You know, we spent a lot of money on doing that as a nicer building. We went above and beyond what Collier County requires from a code perspective, but we recognize that because we want it to look nice. We want it to be something 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 33 of 54 that the community is proud of. And you know, another one would be Granada Shops where we have Hobby Lobby and a couple other developments, but that's at the corner of 41 and Immokalee where trigger Joe's is. That's our development there. So the development is similar to that. AUDIENCE: What's the other developer again? MR. GENSON: It's Metro Commercial. You can look them up. I think they're based out of Philadelphia, somewhere in Pennsylvania. Yes, sir? AUDIENCE: Thank you for your time first of all. I appreciate it. My question is to the county planner. We heard about the traffic impact study paid for by the developer. When's the county going to go in and do a traffic impact study to get maybe a more balanced picture of what this is going to do to Immokalee Road? MS. GUNDLACH: Thanks for the applause, but I'm not a transportation planner so I cannot answer that question. The best person in the room that's qualified is Norm Trebilcock. MR. ARNOLD: And this, again, just before Norm steps up. The county takes our information. They have a series of professional engineers that are also traffic engineers that review Mr. Trebilcock's work against all of their level service standards and the criteria that they've established in their codes. And they make sure that Norm's 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 34 of 54 1 2 work is consistent with that. They don't do their own separate evaluation necessarily. But as Norm mentioned, we 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 are according with them because there are right-of-way needs that they have long-term improvement of Immokalee Road. We're looking at them to try to work out opportunities for a traffic signal on Collier Boulevard. MR. TREBILCOCK: Yes, thank you. Just following up on that, the background traffic that I use in my analysis is provided by the county. So it's not something that I create out of a box or anything like that. The county provides that background data. They also review. When we first develop the traffic impact statement, we have what we call a methodology meeting where we go over the assumptions that are going to be made and the data that's going to be used for the study. And then we create the study and then staff will review that. And we're still in that process. Like for instance, in this project staff did want us to do a specific look at that intersection of Immokalee. It's a specific thing and they wanted the data to be gathered during season to look at peak traffic and then do the projections. So we provided to them and we are in the process with them. So it's not anything where I do it and they just say oh, this is fine. They're critiquing it all along the way. And the data I use is really a lot of data that they provide. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 35 of 54 MR. ARNOLD: Any other persons who haven't had an opportunity to ask a question? Yes, sir? AUDIENCE: Just a thought. As I look at that, every other shopping center that's around has the commercial buildings reversed from the way you have it. AUDIENCE: Yeah. AUDIENCE: As you drive up Immokalee and Collier, you're going to be looking at 60 foot high walls the whole way. Is there a reason that it was built that way rather than reversed? MR. ARNOLD: I'm not sure what you mean. The question is we've reversed ours from the way other people have it. This is proposed typically as you find most other shopping centers. These are denoted as outparcel developments. AUDIENCE: Right. We're going to be looking at the backs of those as we drive up. MR. ARNOLD: Not necessarily, no. I think if you look at a lot of other shopping centers, a bank doesn't want to turn its back to you necessarily or a convenient store or whatever that end user may be or restaurant. They want to present their front face to the street and I would fully expect that they will. The county requires buildings to be architectural standards now. And I think they treat all four sides of an outparcel building as a front façade so you 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 36 of 54 have to put glass and articulation into the building so it can't just be the back of the building facing the street. Someone over here hasn't asked a question. Ma'am back here? AUDIENCE: Yes. All right. So the traffic will be coming out onto Immokalee two different exits. Am I correct so far? MR. ARNOLD: Well, we have two access points that we're proposing. AUDIENCE: Okay. Now there's not going to be a light at either one. So are you taking some of that property to widen Immokalee so that when the people exit that development that they will not be directly on Immokalee? They're going to be on maybe a fourth lane to get onto or are they going to be coming out at a stop sign to take a right directly on Immokalee? MR. ARNOLD: Okay. So the question was in terms of our traffic exiting the project on Immokalee Road, do we exit directly on Immokalee Road? Yes, we do. We do, though, have an internal road network in the project and it might be helpful to look at that and that may help you with some of your concerns as well. Having an internal roadway that moves the traffic within the project and then at each of the exit points. So the western most one would be just a right in, right out access. Okay. And then the next access that would be a right in, right out and left in. There 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 37 of 54 would be no left out for us on that location. And we also as I had mentioned and I'll mention again is we are looking to reserve right-of-way for the future grade separated overpass as well. AUDIENCE: So for the first three or four years before that overpass is built those people, all of that community and that development is coming out directly onto the right-hand lane of Immokalee meaning that now access on Immokalee is really going to only be the two left lanes because the right lane you're going to have people braking and coming out of that development. And the people going down Immokalee are going 45, 50 miles an hour. MR. ARNOLD: I see. We also when we do the improvements in the driveways as often you'll see is we will install turn lanes as well for that so the vehicles can decelerate when they are coming into the site. So that may help or address part of what you're concerned with. AUDIENCE: Accelerate coming out. MR. ARNOLD: Normally what we'll do is the county will look at an improved radius to allow a vehicle to enter the stream of traffic better. Typically on the roadways the county doesn't normally have acceleration lanes like you're talking about. But we will have like an improved radius to allow a vehicle to enter the traffic stream better. Yes, sir in the back? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 38 of 54 AUDIENCE: I have been here all night and you've heard a lot of things. But the most consistent thing you've heard about is traffic and it is the most serious issue. And I know you've done trip studies of the county district so as you defer to the county not yourselves. But how does the public challenge the trip studies because they're not working. They are not going to work for the next two or three years regardless of this development. So how does that process happen going forward is my question? MR. ARNOLD: Well, the process is you're part of it right now. You're here for our neighborhood informational meeting. If you got notice of this meeting, you'll get notice for the planning commission hearing. And I would encourage everybody who has a question, comment, issue to, you know, let Nancy see know what your comments and questions are. I know she can put you in touch with one of the traffic engineers of Collier County that could answer very specific questions and I encourage you to stay involved in the process. Yes, ma'am? AUDIENCE: Could you tell me how many feet your first right in, right out onto Immokalee is from the intersection? MR. ARNOLD: The question is Norm, do you know how far that access point is from the intersection at Immokalee? I'd have to get that measurement for you, but the county has 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 39 of 54 criteria measurement and we meet that standard for that. I'm thinking it's -- I believe it's a 660, I believe, but I'd have to double-check that in the study. AUDIENCE: (Inaudible). MR. ARNOLD: 660 feet away from Collier Boulevard and then this would be about 1320 feet away from Collier Boulevard. So that would be the separation. But I can double-check afterward for you, too. Okay. Yes, sir? AUDIENCE: I understand that you are the owners and you purchased this property to develop it, but we already have a major issue with several developer owned (inaudible). Is there any recommendation that maybe we would like to make a shopping center without any residential. That might reduce the amount of cars. Each apartment that you have probably is two cars. That's another 800 cars additional on road. My recommendation is to make it a shopping center of certain value similar to Mercato and also other shopping centers. But if you want to build and you bought the property, you build something that the community can utilize more so than just more residential. We have enough. MR. ARNOLD: Gentleman in the back? AUDIENCE: If I'm coming from the east past The Quarry, Twin Eagles, how do I get in this place? With a flyover coming, how do I make a left turn in here? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 40 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. ARNOLD: There will be a directional left opening into this property on Immokalee Road. AUDIENCE: Where? Where? You got a flyover coming. MR. ARNOLD: The question is Norm, and you can answer more specifically but we understand. We've seen the county's preliminary plans for the grade separated intersection. And our access point on Immokalee Road will be coordinated with that effort before it starts to achieve the elevation away for the intersection. AUDIENCE: But no light? AUDIENCE: That kind of tailed off there. Can you go back. And how far back do you got to get before the flyover to get in this place? Back by Bent Creek, is that where you're going to be? MR. ARNOLD: No, sir. Our access point is shown right in the middle of our site right here. This would be the proposed location for a left directional into the property. AUDIENCE: Where is this? This is coming off the flyover? MR. ARNOLD: No. If you're coming -- if you're eastbound -- AUDIENCE: No, I'm going west. MR. ARNOLD: If you're going west this way, you 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 41 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 would make a directional left into this site. Other traffic would continue on and go over. AUDIENCE: So there's a stop light and a flyover all at the same place? What's the plan? MR. ARNOLD: Hold on a second because the left turn in is interim only until the flyover goes in. Once the flyover goes in, you would do a u-turn underneath the flyover much like you do at Golden Gate Parkway airport. AUDIENCE: And Then where do I get in? Then where do I get in? I go all the way down Collier? MR. ARNOLD: No, you do a u-turn at the intersection of Immokalee and Collier. AUDIENCE: That makes a lot of sense. AUDIENCE: This is nuts. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir? If we could have your attention, please. Excuse me. Excuse me, please. We still have people that would like to ask questions. And if you want to have a conversation, we can, you know, take that outside, please. But for the benefit of those let's let them ask their questions. AUDIENCE: I realize this is a process. This is going to take several years probably for completion. In the meantime, the old nursery is getting more and more rundown all the time. Is there a possibility that whoever owns it, I know probably (inaudible) although he's not here at least 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 42 of 54 they could clean it up and straighten up the fences that are knocked down and things like that so that it doesn't -- MR. ARNOLD: We can certainly reach out to the current property owner and let him know of your concern. We can't guarantee you what they're going to do, but we'll certainly let them know your concern. Ma'am in front? AUDIENCE: Mine is not a traffic question. Mine is a neighbor question. MR. ARNOLD: Okay, sure. AUDIENCE: For all of the people that live right here, now will these four story apartments are they going to be right up to there to look into our windows or will there be parking before you get to that buildings? MR. ARNOLD: I honestly don't know the specific design yet, ma'am. You know, I think we dealt with this in other locations and I think the Colliers will obviously do a good job. One of the things that may evolve conversation will be for us to get more detail in what kind of buffering we provide. And that's something that we've already started dialogue with (inaudible) from your community, Tuscany. So I mean, that's a dialogue that David and I can continue to have with him. Yes, ma'am? AUDIENCE: I've been got another traffic comment. I just wanted to make example that there is probably a kind of new traffic -- a new mall thing, New York 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 43 of 54 Pizza & Pasta is there. There's a Race Track gas station there on Immokalee. You know where I mean? MR. ARNOLD: Yes, ma'am. AUDIENCE: Okay. Well, when you have to come out of that mall right there -- I can't think of a better name than mall right now. But when you have to come out of that area, that shopping area and go back to Immokalee to like Heritage Bay, for example, that is really also kind of a death trap because you don't want to cross the highway all at once. You have to look to see the traffic coming from one direction, make your way into a middle lane and hang out there until you can be assured that the traffic on Immokalee from the other direction is going to stop. And you're kind of forced to be in the left-hand lane of Immokalee where cars are traveling at about 50 miles an hour or so. So I would hope if you're going to build anything new you would do something that's not like that current situation which I believe is also death trap waiting to happen. You're kind of sitting there as prey. There's not really a designated left turn area for the car to hang out once they come out of that plaza there. Does that make sense? MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. Yeah, I think I understood that. Thank you. Yes, sir? AUDIENCE: Yeah just a two-part question real 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 44 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 quick. Number one is this gentleman mentioned parking. Are there any plans to put in a parking garage of any kind of any height? MR. ARNOLD: I don't think we have a specific plan to put in a parking garage. I don't think there's anything that would exclude us from doing it. We have heights for the residential and the retail and residential buildings. AUDIENCE: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: But until we get a little farther along, I don't think we know. Some of the residential could have structured parking below the building, for instance. AUDIENCE: Sure. MR. ARNOLD: I don't know about the retail. AUDIENCE: And then the second question is kind of up around where Bent Creek comes in there's a preserve back in there. Is that going to remain or are you guys taking that out? MR. ARNOLD: There's really on our property there is no preserve. It's been 100 percent cleared for the nursery operations over the years. AUDIENCE: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: So I think that must be on Bent Creek's property or the cell tower site. AUDIENCE: Okay. All right. Thanks. MR. ARNOLD: Who hasn't asked a question. Yes, 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 45 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ma'am? AUDIENCE: Yeah, what's with the cell tower? That should have come down. MR. ARNOLD: What is with what? AUDIENCE: The cell tower that's right -- MR. ARNOLD: I don't know. It's not on our property so I don't know specifically. AUDIENCE: It's not going to impact you guys, either? MR. ARNOLD: I don't think so. It shouldn't. I've heard that it may be going away, but I don't know for sure. AUDIENCE: It's right here off site. AUDIENCE: Yeah, right close to the area you're developing. MR. ARNOLD: This gentleman on the front row. AUDIENCE: A couple of years ago talked at a county meeting they were talking about the northern extension of Collier and/or Logan. Have you got any updates on that if that's going to happen in our lifetime? MR. ARNOLD: Well, Logan is being extended right now up into Bonita Springs. Collier Boulevard is a little different. They have to get through the Esplanade project to complete part of that. And I don't know that there's a northern turn (inaudible) in Lee County for that roadway. AUDIENCE: Didn't it planned to go north and 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 46 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 turn and go into Logan. MR. ARNOLD: Those were his plans. I don't know anything about the timing. I'm guessing that's several years away at this point. AUDIENCE: So it's not figured into your traffic. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir? AUDIENCE: This is not a traffic question. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. AUDIENCE: What's the purpose of the hotel? MR. ARNOLD: Well, the hotel -- AUDIENCE: You're not near the beach. There's no activities around there. What's the purpose? AUDIENCE: I-75. MR. ARNOLD: The question relates to the purpose of the hotel. We think it's a viable use as this area of the community tends to grow and continues to grow. You have Naples Community Hospital that's made an investment across the street with their Urgent Care. I don't know where those plans may go. But you know, I welcome having a hotel pretty close to my house because I just can't accommodate sometimes in season the relatives who want to come and visit us and the grand kids. So it makes sense where you have population tend to want to be in a hotel. Yes, sir you have question? AUDIENCE: Yes. You have that access road going 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 47 of 54 from Collier Boulevard to right where the boundary line is at Bent Creek. You said you're working with the developer there for an access point into Bent Creek or out of Bent Creek. What are you proposing as the access point: A bicycle path, a walk through or a street? MR. ARNOLD: Well, it could probably be any of those. We call it just a potential interconnection and it could be any and all of those. It could be pedestrian. It could be bike. I'm sure in any event it's need to be access control with the other community access. So those are the details that have to get worked out. If you establish you want to have a connection, we can work out the details on how that results. AUDIENCE: So it's undeterminable at this point? MR. ARNOLD: Undetermined tonight, yeah. Anybody else who hasn't had a chance to ask a question. Yes, ma'am? AUDIENCE: Yes. This is just a point of information for the people in the back half of the room who can't see all the Cs and Es and everything. Just show me point out where's Immokalee Road, where's Collier Road? Okay. What is that? MR. ARNOLD: This is Immokalee Road that Norm is pointing to in green. That's Collier Boulevard. So we're at that hard corner of Collier Boulevard and Immokalee Road. AUDIENCE: Okay, thank you. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 48 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. ARNOLD: Yes, ma'am? AUDIENCE: Where's the hotel? MR. ARNOLD: The hotel could be on any of the tracts that are labeled commercial or commercial/residential. So they could be anywhere in the northern two-thirds of the property. AUDIENCE: But not on the right-hand side? MR. ARNOLD: Not in the lower right-hand side. Anybody else? AUDIENCE: One question. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, ma'am? AUDIENCE: So you (inaudible) for a major box store. You know, typically a hardware store we get a lot of truck traffic, the loading of pallets and things like that going on. Is that still on the table or you think you'll do something with a hotel and some of the other things that you're planning? Because that would have a very big cultural impact. MR. GENSON: Now as Wayne said before, we're including the use as an allowable use. I will tell you right now that both Lowe's and Home Depot are not building any stores. They are actually only two Home Depots being built in the United States this year. So we've had zero interest from those guys. So right now I cannot say that they wouldn't come. If they decided for some reason that 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 49 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 they wanted to expand, we would obviously talk to them. But right now I can tell you that there's zero interest from the big lots guys. AUDIENCE: Is Sears coming? MR. ARNOLD: In case the tape didn't hear it, the question was is Sears coming? I think the answer is absolutely not. Anybody else have questions? Yes, sir? AUDIENCE: In any of the future meetings will there be traffic engineers available? AUDIENCE: From the county? MR. ARNOLD: When the county has its planning commission public hearing which will be the next public hearing, they do have their transportation planning staff in attendance of those meetings? AUDIENCE: When is that, do you know? MR. ARNOLD: We don't have dates set. You'll get public notices for that. AUDIENCE: Could I suggest to -- just a suggestion, Ms. Gundlach. If you've got a line of communication to the commissioners, okay, the people in this room are all upscaled expensive home people. This is not Schloch we're talking about in this room. Okay. For this to be -- and I know we're talking about maximum density commercialism here. I get that. Okay. And you guys are involved in that and that's the subject of this meeting. 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 50 of 54 But some of those people who are going to be asking for our votes in a couple weeks, okay, better understand that there's not a bunch of fools in here about the traffic situation. And believe me, there's a lot of noise that can be made about that. Okay. I would just kindly ask you to pass along the concerns that we had and get some of these people off their ass and come to these meetings. End of story, ending my speech. MR. ARNOLD: And on that note, I would just indicate that we prepare a written transcript and an audio tape of this meeting to pass along to the commissioners. AUDIENCE: Good. I'm on record, then. That's great. MR. ARNOLD: You are on record. And if you'd like a copy of any of this, feel free to pick up Sharon's card in the back and we can e-mail her and we can get you updated information as we have it. You can go to her web site and go on the link for the site and find up-to-date information as we submit it. Ma'am, you had a question before we adjourn? AUDIENCE: Well, just comment here. You're proposing a 400 unit hotel not near the beach, not near any recreational areas. And what you're saying is so when we have overflow when our children come for Christmas they can stay at that hotel. And Christmas rates are usually $400, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 51 of 54 $375 a night. It would be cheaper for us to purchase a condo and rent it during season and have our children stay there. I mean, to me that makes sense. MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. And maybe I didn't make myself clear. We're asking for a 140 unit hotel, 400 residential units. Anyone else? Yes, ma'am in the back. AUDIENCE: Yeah, I just want to talk about the traffic again. I'm sure you realize that just -- MR. ARNOLD: Hold on folks. Please, can we all be quiet. There's a question in the back of the room, please. AUDIENCE: No, the only thing I'm saying is it's 45 miles an hour. And then just beyond where this development is going it becomes 50 miles an hour. So people coming across Collier they're already speeding up to go 50 miles an hour and that's my concern there. MR. ARNOLD: I understand. When we design like the turn lanes and the offsite improvements it is based on the speed limits or actually the design speed which is typically a little bit higher than the posted speed for the roadway. So that is something that the county does look at when we design improvements and it's something that is evaluated. So it is an important issue, you're right. AUDIENCE: Thank you very much. MR. ARNOLD: Anybody else before we adjourn? AUDIENCE: Do I get a second chance? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 52 of 54 MR. ARNOLD: Sure. Yes, sir, I have another question over here. AUDIENCE: So the county has a solution of extending Vanderbilt to relieve a lot of the traffic congestion that we're experiencing now on Immokalee. Okay. And they say that the completion of that is supposedly -- I don't think it's started quite yet. I'm not positive about that. But its completion time is about two years. All right. That's the county's solution. It probably is going to relieve a lot of traffic congestion on Immokalee. But in the meantime, the approval of more and more residential and commercial locations in this area from Vanderbilt up to Logan makes absolutely no sense because you haven't gotten to the point of relieving the congestion that we now have. So I don't understand why we can't wait with any more projects up here until Vanderbilt extension is completed. You know, you guys are, you know, engineers and you're hired to do a job. So I'm really addressing everybody that's still here, you know. It's critical to finish the Vanderbilt extension before we add any more people, any more cars. It's already, as many people have expressed, very difficult particularly in the rush hour periods to deal with this road. So we live here and it's hard on us. So I don't see why we need to go ahead with this in early 2019 when the county says it's a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 53 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 two-year thing where sometime in 2020 they will be finished with it. That's my point. Thank you for listening. MR. ARNOLD: Thank you for coming. Thanks for your comments. Anybody else who wants to get anything on -- questions answered before we adjourn for the evening? If not, I'm going to wrap it up and say goodnight. Thanks everybody for coming. (End of the meeting.) - - - 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 54 of 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 C E R T I F I C A T E - - - I, Vicki Woodham, Court Reporter and Transcriptionist, do hereby certify that I was authorized to and did listen to and stenographically transcribe the foregoing recorded meeting and that the transcript is a true record to the best of my professional ability. Dated this 24th day of October, 2018. Vicki Woodham, Court Reporter 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) IMMOKALEE RD VANDERBILT BEACH RD COLLIER BLVD Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Baumgarten MPUD Aerial Photograph . 0 0.65 1.30.325 Miles SUBJECT PROPERTY 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Collier BLVDImmokalee RD Bellaire Bay DR Toscana WAY Crystal Lake DRPlateau RDSage AVE Cortona WAYGervais CIR Quar t z LNBurnt Pine DRSweet Bay LNWoodhurst DR Glenforest DRGoodland Bay DRL i m e s t o n e T R L Fly Caster PTVo l t e r r a C TTuscany Cov e DR Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Baumgarten MPUD Location Map SUBJECT PROPERTY . 620 0 620310 Feet 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) LAKE IMMOKALEE ROAD COLLIER BLVD (951)AMENITY LAKE PUD BOUNDARY RESIDENTIAL TRACT BOUNDARY 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ACTIVITY CENTER BOUNDARY ACTIVITY CENTER BOUNDARY C R R R 1 A E1 R.O.W. OR ACCESS EASEMENT 1 R.O.W. OR ACCESS EASEMENT C C C C C C C C R.O.W. DEDICATION AREA = 1.3± AC POTENTIAL INTERCONNECT WITH BENT CREEK PUD1 POTENTIAL EGRESS FROM TUSCANY COVE PUD TO BAUMGARTEN PUD CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER OUTFALL LOCATION TO COLLIER BOULEVARD CANAL GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 www.GradyMinor.com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 0 300'150' SCALE: 1" = 300' WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5 X 11 HERITAGE BAY MPUD COMMERCIAL BENT CREEK PRESERVE PUD RESIDENTIAL TUSCANY COVE PUD RESIDENTIAL RICHLAND PUD COMMERCIAL #= DEVIATION ACTIVITY CENTER LIMITS POTENTIAL WELL SITE 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) LAKE IMMOKALEE ROAD COLLIER BLVD (951)AMENITY LAKE C C/R R R C C C C C C C C GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 www.GradyMinor.com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 0 300'150' SCALE: 1" = 300' WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5 X 11 HERITAGE BAY MPUD COMMERCIAL BENT CREEK PRESERVE PUD RESIDENTIAL TUSCANY COVE PUD RESIDENTIAL RICHLAND PUD COMMERCIAL #= DEVIATION ACTIVITY CENTER LIMITS POTENTIAL WELL SITE 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Attachment E (1 of 2) Transcript - Baumgarten PUD 10-16-18 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) TRANSCRIPT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING FOR PELICAN NURSERY MPUD OCTOBER 18, 2017 Appearances: WAYNE ARNOLD RICHARD YOVANOVICH, ESQ. NORMAN TREBILCOCK DAVID GENSON NANCY GUNDLACH SHARON UMPENHOUR 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) MR. ARNOLD: Hi, everybody. I'm Wayne Arnold of GradyMinor Engineering. And sitting here on the front row is Sharon Umpenhour, who (indiscernible) most of the advertising in the paper for us, but we're required by the county to either video record or audio recording the meeting, so we're going to audio record the meeting. We're here for Pelican Nursery rezoning. Our team tonight, we have David Genson with Barron Collier Companies, who are under contract to buy the property. And I have Richard Yovanovich, who is our land use attorney working on it. And Norm Trebilcock, who is the traffic engineer working on the project. So we're in the process of rezoning the nursery, which is an agricultural property to a commercial planned unit development, it's actually a mixed use planned development, that's going to allow both commercial and residential project. I'm sure most of you are familiar with the project. It's about 56 acres in size on the southeast corner of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard. And that's -- in an area called an activity center in Collier County, about 40 acres of it are 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) in the activity center. The balance of it is within what's called a density band around the activity center. So this is an area where the county has encouraged some of the more intensive development to occur under their growth management plan. You're familiar with some of the commercial, I'm sure, that's across the street to the north and then quadrants of the other parts of the activity center on the north and west side of the intersection. So we are -- just filed our application, oh, I don't know, 45 days or so ago and we're required to hold these meetings after we get our initial comments back from the county but before we go to public hearings. So we're holding the meeting now, since we have our county comments back, our first round of those comments back, I should say. There will be several iterations of going back and forth with Collier County staff before we make it to an advertised public hearing, but this is one of the steps in the zoning process. So as part of the planning and development, we establish our own zoning district, and in that 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) zoning district, we're going to make provisions for both the commercial development and residential development. And one of the components of that is to do a conceptual master plan for the county, and not always a lot of detail on them. And, at this point, Barron Collier Companies are still working with a retail partner to look at what the real layout is going to be for a commercial component, but a highlight of the master plan, this is Collier Boulevard to the west, Immokalee Road to the north. They have a commercial tract that's located at the intersection. We're going to have one access point on Collier Boulevard near our southern entrance. We're going to have two access points on -- it's two, right, Norm? MR. TREBILCOCK: Yes. MR. ARNOLD: Two access points on Immokalee Road. And those are being coordinated with Collier County. There's some other intersection improvements occurring out there if you live in that part of the world that you're aware of. So we're working with the county on those as well. To the south, near us is Tuscany Cove. We had our residential tracts that we've identified on our 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) conceptual plan, amenity center probably near the entrance. And then we identified the tract all the way to the east in the northeast corner of our site as a commercial or residential tract. And that would allow potentially either mixed use or commercial or residential only. We're showing what we're calling a bypass road and working with the county, they're looking for any opportunity to take traffic off their intersections. So they've asked us to try to create at least a pathway so people can get around the project. In this case, probably a northern approach for people is easier than a south one. There's a potential, at some point, maybe to get a traffic signal in there. I know that Norm and others have been talking to the county about that, but there's no certainty on that at this point. Some of the uses that we've asked for on the commercial side are pretty typical of what you'd find in most other retail shopping centers. We're asking for the gamut of retail uses, office uses (indiscernible). We're going to ask for a movie theater, gas station with convenience, car wash, things of that nature, clothing stores, probably a 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) drug store, and then that's -- we've asked for a long list of uses, because the market's in flux and we're not certain what the end users will be at this point. So we're asking for a lot -- we've also asked for hotel/motel, and other -- veterinarian offices, any of those things, a hardware store, things of that nature that you would typically think you'd find in a large-scale shopping center. There's about -- 36, 38 acres of that is commercial and then the balance is considered to be residential under the county's comprehensive plan. So we're asking for -- our initial submittal was for 228,000 square feet of commercial. And in that we had a conversion factor that we could increase that amount. Our initial comments back from the county attorney said, well, either take out the conversion or tell us what your maximum conversion could be. So we think that upper end of commercial could be 300,000 square feet if we did conversion of other residential units and built less residential and more commercial. So we'll be amending our documents with Nancy Gundlach -- and I apologize. I didn't introduce Nancy. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Nancy Gundlach is sitting on the front row. Nancy works for Collier County. She's the staff principal planner that's been assigned to our case. So she'll be shepherding it through the process. So she'll -- she probably will have business cards out there or has some if she didn't. So she's a good point of contact if you have questions. We're happy to answer questions, too, and we'll make our information available to you as well. So we're asking for that. We're asking for only two types of residential. We're asking for multi-family or townhouse development. And the county considers multi-family and townhouse to be really anything that's three or more attached units. So we're asking for those. And then we're going to be establishing, in our PUD document, development standards for each of those uses. And we've got numbers that we've approached the county with with regard to building setbacks and heights and things of that nature. So the retail buildings, for instance, we're proposing those to have a zoned height of 50 feet as a maximum zoned height, 65 feet in actual height. And the county defines height two different 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) ways. The zoned height is the way most older communities have expressed their height, and it's kind of to the midpoint of a roof from your (indiscernible) and then (indiscernible) elevation and then the actual height is actually measured from the centerline of the nearest roadway, but it's to the very top of any part of your structure. So we have to establish two different methods for showing the building height. So we also have a separate standard for office buildings. I should put my glasses on so I can make sure I read you the right number. We're asking for office buildings have a principal zoned height of 55 feet and an actual height of 65 feet. And then our townhouses, we're having a zoned height of 45 feet for those, with an actual height of 50, and on multi-family buildings, we're proposing a maximum building height of 55 feet and an actual height of 65 feet. So that's kind of, you know, the parameters that we're working under. And we've, you know, tried to be complementary. We know we have neighbors to the south and to the east. So we're putting the potential for residential adjacent to more residential and trying to focus the more 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) intensity out at the intersection where it makes the most compatible relationship with our neighbors. So that's kind of, in a nutshell, what we're proposing. I know it's not a lot of detail at this point. We're probably going to be in this process another six months, wouldn't you say is fair, Nancy? MS. GUNDLACH: Yes. MR. ARNOLD: Just given kind of the nature of how projects have occurred. And we will have to have a public hearing before the Collier County Planning Commission and they will make a recommendation to the County Commission, ultimately, for approval or denial or approval with conditions. It's something the staff, too, will be working toward. As we go through the document, they will end up conditioning things. They will probably establish things like a vehicular trip cap for our project, which will be keyed into the conversion factor of what we're talking about for increasing the amount of commercial. And there will be other conditions relative to transportation improvements and any number of 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) things that the county comes up with. We've asked for what are considered deviations from the code. We'll probably have three. Sometimes the list grows or shrinks depending on as reviews from the county come in, but right now we are asking for three deviations from the normal code requirements. And one of those relates to the width of the bypass road that I explained. The county -- if we end up platting that as a true road, the county has a minimum 60-feet width, but we think 40 feet is more than adequate for a bypass road. We're not even sure we're platted, but we're asking for the deviation in the event that we do. We're asking for a sidewalk to be located on only one side of the bypass road rather than two sides of that bypass road. And then we're asking to work with the county to go ahead and -- we have to build a sidewalk adjacent to our property in the rights-of-way. There's going to be so much roadwork that's occurring out on Immokalee Road, we've asked for that ability to actually build a sidewalk on our property instead of in the county right-of-way. So that's something we'll be working with the county 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) transportation staff as we go through the process. So that's it in a nutshell. I think that Nancy -- I don't know if you want to offer up anything. It's pretty early in the process, still. There's going to be (indiscernible). What I usually tell people, we end up adding all of the PUD application materials on our website and that can be linked through -- Sharon has got a business card and you can access the information through that website. Nancy always has access to the most updated information that's been submitted to the county from our group. And then, of course, any of our team are happy to answer questions. So I know that's kind of a brief overview and not a ton of detail, but to the extent we can answer questions, I'm happy to do so unless, Rich, did I leave out anything that you (indiscernible). Okay. MR. YOVANOVICH: (Indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Okay. Good. Questions? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: When do you plan on completion of the project? MR. ARNOLD: Well, it will probably take us 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) through at least the first -- where are we? We're in October. Probably early 2018 to get through the zoning process. And then they have to go through site development plan approval. So it's probably going to be the later part of 2018 at the earliest. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. Another question I have is where the properties abut, Tuscany Way, you have residential over there. MR. ARNOLD: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Are there any sound barriers or vegetation or anything planned? MR. ARNOLD: The county requires us to put in landscape buffers, and I think -- we're in an activity center. I think it's probably -- it's a 15-foot wide, considered type B. And a type B buffer requires it to be either a hedge, a wall or a combination of hedge/wall/berm that achieves opacity at six feet of height. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So there will be -- at the end of the property, it will be a combination, possibly a combination of hedge and wall, but there will be a sound buffer? MR. ARNOLD: Well, I don't know that I would call it a sound buffer. I mean, it's definitely going to be a landscape buffer. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Land -- okay. Any particulars on the -- any particulars on what the landscaping would look like? MR. ARNOLD: No, not at this point. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Or height -- or height of the -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Wall. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: -- wall. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: How high will the wall be? MR. ARNOLD: No. The county -- the county requirements -- I think Nancy -- Nancy (indiscernible) but it's a six-foot high minimum to have an opacity. The county doesn't require us to put in a wall. It doesn't mean we won't put in a wall, but the county doesn't require it. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: But there is a buffer where that is required? MR. ARNOLD: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Whether it's landscape or wall? MR. ARNOLD: Correct. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And it should be at least six foot? 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. It has to be opaque within one year and maintain the six feet in height. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: Who had their hand up first? Yes. Let's go to this side of the room. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Will you be blasting for a lake? MR. ARNOLD: I don't think so. I don't believe so. David Genson (indiscernible). MR. GENSON: No. David Genson with Barron Collier. County ordinance will not allow us to blast within 1,500 feet of the nearest residences as well as roadways. So all -- any water management (indiscernible) will be mechanically excavated. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: He may have meant (indiscernible) question. The owner of the property now is Barron Collier? MR. ARNOLD: No. They're in contract to purchase the property from the owner (indiscernible). 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Who owns the property now? MR. ARNOLD: It's (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Tree Plateau, Inc. MR. ARNOLD: Tree Plateau, Inc. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Corporation. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Three -- MR. ARNOLD: Tree. Tree Plateau. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Tree. And Collier -- Barron Collier is attempting to purchase that property for this? MR. ARNOLD: That's correct. Yes. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Who's the developer? MR. ARNOLD: Well, it will most likely be developed by Barron Collier, one of their entities. I say Barron Collier because they have a lot of corporate names that they do work under, but the umbrella of Barron Collier Companies will be part of the development team. Yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Is there a URL of that informational website that you can offer at this time? MS. UMPENHOUR: If you go to gradyminor.com -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What is it? 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) MS. UMPENHOUR: Gradyminor.com, and hit the planning tab and then look for Pelican Nursery and PUD, there's a link to the county documents where all the documents we've submitted. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I'm part of Tuscany Cove, and basically right now Collier Boulevard is basically a pretty heavily trafficked area and where you're basically putting in the entrance to your property, we also have a U-turn lane which is also very complicated at the moment between people making U-turns, people coming out of Tuscany Cove, then the traffic buildup from Immokalee back to our Tuscany Cove entrance has been horrendous. It's just huge. And my concern is that we may most likely be locked out of trying to get onto Collier Boulevard as part of it, based just where your entrance is, which I know you've got to put one. MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: But we've got a problem with that as well as the buffer zone. That's my other second problem is that I want to make sure that there's nothing -- you know, what 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) has been up there, whatever Irma didn't take out and we're replacing at the present time as soon as we can clean up the debris, we're going to need some help with that buffer zone and we have a small entryway that goes right into your nursery that I guess when Elias Brothers was building the property they stopped there because in 2008 the market took a dump and they stopped building and they stopped at that road. I was wondering if there was -- I was thinking, is there an exit that we could use if you're going to have a road going out that we could possibly -- if that's in there. I don't -- MR. ARNOLD: We did not propose one. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: Primarily because your homes were developed south of us. The county, if you were undeveloped, would most likely tell us we should provide some opportunity for you to (indiscernible) to your property. Same thing with (indiscernible) creek. We didn't really provide any type of interconnect to them. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: But basically your entrance on Collier is not set in stone yet. MR. ARNOLD: Not exactly. It probably -- Norm 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Trebilcock can answer that, but I think the county is going to tell us they want us to be about as far away from Immokalee Road as we can be. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Would you have a traffic light? MR. ARNOLD: Well, I think we're hopeful that someday we'll get one. There's no guarantee. You have to meet certain (indiscernible) to get a signal. I know that Barron Collier and their development partner would like to have one. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: They just shut down the Pebblebrook left turn lane just simply because of the traffic and the accidents that have been complicated from that. MR. ARNOLD: Right. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And that's one thing that's out of the way and I was hoping that we -- I know they're doing a survey now on the U-turn lane by Tuscany Cove where a homeowner could drive in and other people are making U-turns. We're planning on trying to close that down and shoot down to the next traffic light and wait for the arrow to make the U-turn, which I think is much safer, but we haven't heard that (indiscernible). I think they're doing the survey as we speak, but 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Dan -- Dan something (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. They're trying to alleviate some of the traffic. But if you go up and down Collier, I'm going to say right now, you are in bumper-to-bumper traffic. MR. ARNOLD: It's a busy intersection. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Very busy. And the building beside yourself, if you just make a right turn onto Immokalee, you know, you hit three country clubs and now the Amorada (phonetic) -- not -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: LaMorada. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: LaMorada is going up. And then ahead of that, on further toward the casino, there's a few more that are in the planning stage. MR. ARNOLD: Sure. Yep. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So, I mean, the traffic here is going to be exploding. MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. Sir, in the back. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: You referred to the residential area as X number of square feet, whatever it was. And I can't relate to that in 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) terms of housing units. MR. ARNOLD: Well, we're asking for a maximum -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: What's your best guess, maximum? MR. ARNOLD: We're asking for a maximum of 400 dwelling units. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. So with three to four people, we're looking at another 1,200 people, at least daily, if not (indiscernible) season that are going to go through that intersection. MR. ARNOLD: Yes. And we've analyzed all of the trips based on the maximum numbers that we're asking for, so. Yes, sir? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: As you progress along, a lot of our people, I live in Tuscany Cove, are not down here and won't be down here until January. Do you plan on having any meeting with Tuscany Cove for residents, a private meeting? MR. ARNOLD: May I -- sometimes we do. Sometimes we don't. It really depends on the interest that you might have. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, I mean, one-third of the people if not one-half of the people are still not down here. And, of course, by word of mouth, everything is going to change. MR. ARNOLD: Is there a committee I can contact somebody can provide to us? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. Right here is our president. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. Well, why don't we exchange information before we leave tonight. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: This way here, when they get back down, you can have a meeting. It will make it a lot easier to understand. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I could have a meeting at the clubhouse for the residents of Tuscany Cove and give them an update, what's basically happening. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Until you find (indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: I saw a hand up somewhere over here. Sir, did you have a question for me on the end? No? Okay. I thought I saw a hand up over there. There's got to be more questions. Yes, sir. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. With the size of the commercial development, you know, some time ago, there was a rumor, and there always are rumors, there might have been either a Home Depot or Lowe's. MR. ARNOLD: I heard that rumor, too. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. Is that a viable -- MR. ARNOLD: We think it's a viable use. It's just that nobody has stepped up to the table in that regard. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: So, I mean, that -- those type of uses are listed in our schedule of uses. So if Home Depot or Lowe's pops back into the picture, we could accommodate them, but there's not one in the waiting at the moment. Yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: You mentioned something about having the possibility of a gas station. MR. ARNOLD: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: As you very well know, we just have -- RaceTrac had just got built. And I'm just concerned that, you know, I'm just 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) concerned if we -- do we really need another gas station pretty much right across the street? I believe, obviously, you know, the gas -- any accidents and whatnot would be sort of a little bit of a concern. I'm just wondering if you're just sort of like throwing that into the pot just as a possibility of, well, we'll do this, we'll do that, or are you seriously concerned about trying to get a gas station? MR. ARNOLD: Well, I think a gas station would be viable use for Barron Collier. It's on (indiscernible) for a lot of people in that corridor, and, you know, that's always a convenience for people to be able to just pull in and out on their way home to get your gas. So a lot of us, we've got uses in there that probably will never materialize, but you're going to have to respond to the market over the course of however many years that a shopping center is going to be built. So you have to fill up space as they come and go. So, you know, what's there initially today as a, you know, health food store, could very well become a doctor's office in the future. So we'd 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) have to provide a wide range of uses to accommodate what happens. Have you got another question? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes. My other question was, do you have any like sort of like a -- more like big market stores that you're sort of trying to get friendly with to see if you can just get them on board? MR. ARNOLD: I don't know the answer. David, do you know the answer to that? MR. GENSON: Well, just to clarify. Barron Collier is doing this as a joint venture with another company called Metro Commercial. They are our retail partner on here. Eric Malloy is here from Metro Commercial. So I'll let him speak on kind of the retail side of things of what we're trying to do. MR. MALLOY: When we got involved with this project, we cast a wide net. Many of you heard the Lowe's/Home Depot rumor. We think, from a market spacing point of view, it makes great sense. But, unfortunately, both of those companies are not expanding at all. We think that this is a really nice site for food stores and restaurants and other things. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) We're talking to a lot of people, but until we get through the zoning, we really aren't serious with anybody. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay. (Indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: While we're on the roads, I've lived in Tuscany Cove for a little over nine years. When they started CVS over there and there was nothing else around, they told us that there may be, in the future, a road that will go right over Immokalee Road and follow all the way up to Fort Myers Airport. MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, there's -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Have you heard the rumor? MR. ARNOLD: The Collier Boulevard Extension was something that was going to go through what's now Esplanade. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) overpass. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. MR. ARNOLD: So they had talked about this. Oh, you're talking about -- are you talking about 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) the north/south road or -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, overpass, about (indiscernible) going straight across. MR. ARNOLD: Well, I think he's talking about the Logan Extension, 951/Logan Extension? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. The -- not the Logan Extension. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: No, no. 951, Collier Boulevard Extension. It goes over now just past the Esplanade. It is actually built right up to Bonita Beach Road where Lee County takes over. And if Lee County doesn't come up with the bucks, that road goes no further. So it's up to Lee County now to continue. MR. ARNOLD: Norm probably knows, but I don't think Lee County -- (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) have been sent assets in regards to who's going to have to pay for the road. MR. TREBILCOCK: Right. For the record, my name is Norm Trebilcock with Trebilcock Consulting Solutions. I'm an engineer and planner as well and prepared the traffic study for the project. But to your point, in the long term, 951, 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Collier County would plan for it to extend in the future to Lee County. It's a matter of when Lee County would look to see for that to connect as well. But the idea, there was -- there is a concept of a flyover, but the flyover actually would fly Immokalee over 951, is the idea. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Oh, Immokalee overpass (indiscernible). MR. TREBILCOCK: Yes. It would be elevated. So that's why you see right now in the construction of the intersection improvements how the canal is deflecting way over, they're providing a footprint then for that center to go over. And that's part of their communications with us, too, to make sure that they get their footprint right in case they have it, you know, you know, communication with us and things like that because -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It makes more sense now. MR. TREBILCOCK: Yeah. So that's the idea. Because that's your heaviest volume, is that east/west Immokalee Road. So, you know -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: You know, if you get off at Bonita Beach Road and take a right and go 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) down three miles, there's probably 20,000 truckloads of dirt and sand and everything else down there. They're supposed to bring it up there. And Lee County says there's no way they're going to let it go through. The government says no. MR. TREBILCOCK: This would be -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's going through. MR. TREBILCOCK: This would parallel, you know, like the Golden Gate Parkway/Airport Road flyover. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Exactly. MR. TREBILCOCK: It's actually (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That's great. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That will help a little bit. MR. TREBILCOCK: Yeah. It made a huge difference at that intersection, like it would here. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's a tough intersection. MR. TREBILCOCK: Yeah. So the county is just planning ahead for that. That's all, yeah. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Is the flyover something that's already in the works or something 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) that you're involved with? MR. TREBILCOCK: No. We're not -- with what we're doing here, were just -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So the flyover is something already in the works with the county? MR. TREBILCOCK: Right. They're just -- what they do is they will try to footprint for it in the future so that, you know, that they can build it at the appropriate time for them. It's based on, you know, volume of traffic and things like that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: But it's in the planning. MR. TREBILCOCK: From the county standpoint, they're master planning for it, exactly. Like the -- like I said, the intersection improvements they're building now, they intentionally put the canal way over -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. MR. TREBILCOCK: -- to allow for that footprint. So that way, as they need to build it, it won't be as expensive to build. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And the flyover is part of that whole plan? MR. TREBILCOCK: Correct. Yes, sir. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: You have, on the right side, the east side, CR. Is that commercial, residential? MR. ARNOLD: Commercial, residential. It could be both, and/or. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And/or or both? MR. ARNOLD: It could be some commercial and residential mixed use, so to speak, or it could be only commercial, it could be residential. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: What is -- what is actually on the planning right now? Is it just the -- is it 400 multi-family -- MR. ARNOLD: No. We're asking for approval for all of it. So it's all the commercial and the residential that's part of our -- that will be part of our zoning. It's just we don't have definitive plans for how much of each we will be building. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Will there be restaurants and -- or potential restaurants on both of those? MR. ARNOLD: I think the intent would be, yes. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Like Rockets, for instance? (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MR. ARNOLD: I'll have to talk to them, but, 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) yeah, I think that's (indiscernible). (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MR. ARNOLD: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I'd like to say about the sidewalks, you know, if you want to eliminate one on one side of the street going through and all that, which doesn't make it really good for people trying to walk around and get around on bikes and such. Is there going to be bike paths in and out of there? Is there going to be an opportunity to add that sidewalk back in? MR. ARNOLD: Well, the reason we asked for the deviation is because it's really -- it's going to be a glorified driveway for -- that cuts through the project. We just didn't feel like the cross-section warranted to be designed like a (indiscernible) street. So that's why we've asked for the deviation. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: That's only for that north/south (indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: That's only for this, yes. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: But is there any reason why it has to be a driveway and it can't be a wider (indiscernible)? 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) MR. ARNOLD: Well, the funny thing with the county is, we could call it a (indiscernible) right-of-way, but the street standards are exactly the same amount of pavement, the same sidewalk with the same utility locations. So for a road that we know is not going to exceed two travel lanes, possibly three with a turn, because it has a turn lane in it, 40 feet is ample (indiscernible). The county probably will approve that, is my guess, or for the bypass road, Nancy. It's been an issue for other local streets. You know, we commonly used to get that, but -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: But my point is, you're still deviating from the sidewalk, or are you still (indiscernible)? MR. ARNOLD: Well, I'm not sure we are, because if it's a driveway and we don't have to plat it, it's not considered a road that would require sidewalks anyway. You know, it's probably -- it's a technicality, but, you know, if you go to most shopping centers, you don't have sidewalks on (indiscernible). And that's essentially what it's likely to be. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: So just to back up to sidewalks. Along Immokalee Road, you said something about sidewalks. You still would have a sidewalk there? MR. ARNOLD: Yes, we will. The deviation was to allow it to be on our property instead of in the county's right-of-way. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And it will just be a sidewalk or multi-purpose path? MR. ARNOLD: The county would require us to build a six-foot wide sidewalk (indiscernible) current code. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And I think there's a multi-purpose path along Collier. MR. ARNOLD: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: On the side of Collier. Would that remain? MR. ARNOLD: Do you know for sure? I assume it will. It's in the county right-of-way. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's on the right side of the canal, so (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: East side of the canal. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) MR. ARNOLD: (Indiscernible). Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I have a question. You mentioned something about the potential of a car wash. Does that mean -- have you noticed any environmental issues with putting up a car wash? Because a car wash is something that is well needed. MR. ARNOLD: I don't -- I wouldn't expect there to be any environmental issues related to a car wash. Most of those systems these days, they use recycled water and they're pretty clean, so -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. Have you been in discussions with anybody regarding a car wash? MR. ARNOLD: I don't know. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: One more question about (indiscernible). Have you discussed with anybody any anchors for the commercial part, like the rumor had it that it was going to be Lowe's, that it was going to be Home Depot. Do you have any other anchors? I mean, Publix is across the street. What anchors are you thinking about for that section? MR. ARNOLD: Any thoughts on that? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: We don't have any 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) specific anchors. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So you have no anchors? MR. ARNOLD: Not yet. It's really hard to get people ready to sign a lease when -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's the beginning stages. I understand that. MR. ARNOLD: Right. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So it's wide open? MR. ARNOLD: It's wide open right now, yes, sir. Yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: The border between Tuscany Cove and your property -- MR. ARNOLD: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: -- the whole border, that's all going to have a hedge, the whole -- MR. ARNOLD: The county requires us, where we have multi-family against single family, we have to provide a 15-foot wide buffer. It has got to have -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: The (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Excuse me a minute. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's going to be right along that -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: The whole way? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right along Tuscany Cove. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: When will that go in, prior to all of the construction, noise, mess and destruction or after? MR. ARNOLD: I'm assuming it's going to go in as part of the initial phases of construction, David, the landscape buffer -- MR. GENSON: Yes. MR. ARNOLD: -- on the south side? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Before all the mess starts? MR. ARNOLD: Well, I think it's -- it occurs concurrently with commencement of construction of the project. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And will it be maintained ad infinitum? MR. ARNOLD: Yes. Yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: So I'm here for Heritage Bay Golf and Country Club, and our membership has mostly concerns about the traffic 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) issues on Immokalee. So tomorrow we have a board meeting and I am to report on this meeting tonight. What would you have me say to our membership that would put them somewhat at ease or could give them some additional knowledge about the traffic issue? MR. ARNOLD: Well, we think that -- you know, we're going to be working with Collier County, as Norm indicated, on their potential footprint for the Immokalee Road improvements. And we're going to be doing some road improvements for our own access points at locations on Immokalee and Collier Boulevard. I don't know that we -- I don't know we have a direct issue with -- you know, there are users other than -- obviously, they're going to have more people on Immokalee Road in that intersection, ultimately. Yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: When you say (indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Can you hang on a second? I couldn't -- it's a little noisy. I'm not sure we're picking you up on the microphone. I 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) apologize. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: But you also just mentioned Collier Boulevard. MR. ARNOLD: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Is there any intention to continue to widen Collier Boulevard (indiscernible)? MR. ARNOLD: I don't think so. I think the county is kind of constrained by the canal that's there. I don't know of any -- I've not seen any plans. Norm, do you know -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I have no idea what you mean by (indiscernible). What did you mean by that? MR. ARNOLD: Well, we're going to provide an access point on Collier Boulevard to our property. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: An access point? MR. ARNOLD: Yes. And we'll probably have to put a turn lane in, into the project. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: That's when you said before that the county would want it as far away from Immokalee Road as possible? MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. I'm pretty sure, Norm, that's probably -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Well, when the 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) county -- when the county tells you that they want it as far away or south of Immokalee Road, that also means it's putting it very close to Tuscany Cove. MR. TREBILCOCK: Yeah, but what they would do, just to maybe help answer your question, there's -- on the opposite side, the commercial area there, there's an access lining up there. We would line up with that access point. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) to Immokalee Road (indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: It's Collier Boulevard. MR. TREBILCOCK: I'm sorry. This is Collier Boulevard. I thought (indiscernible). This is Pebblebrook -- (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MR. TREBILCOCK: Do you know where Pebblebrook is? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. MR. TREBILCOCK: There are two lanes that come out. Right now, they've been modified recently. So we would be opposite that, which is actually slightly further north. It wouldn't be right on the boundary line with Tuscany, Tuscany Cove. It would be a little further up (indiscernible) not 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) that little -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: So you would cross (indiscernible) Pebblebrook entrance (indiscernible). MR. TREBILCOCK: Exactly. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: -- with Pebblebrook? MR. TREBILCOCK: Exactly. The ones -- the one -- not Publix, but Pebblebrook, the one a little further south right there, because the idea would be potentially to have an opportunity for that to be maybe a signalized intersection or full median open or something. It may correct some of the issues that are out there today, you know, so that's one of the options. So that's why they would tend to want us to line that up access-wise, so that's where that goes. So hopefully that helps you there. But it is a little further away. It's not right up, hugging up against Tuscany Cove. It's a little further up there. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) even since Collier Boulevard has been widened and it has a right-hand turn lane onto Immokalee Road. MR. TREBILCOCK: Uh-huh. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And with the county building and more developments and whatever, there clearly is more traffic. MR. TREBILCOCK: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: When the county came along and changed it, that people could make a U-turn right in front of Tuscany Cove, I have made phone calls early back in the year. That created a very dangerous situation, especially when we (indiscernible) knowing what the driver's true intention is because we don't have a turn signal that says I'm making a U-turn. MR. TREBILCOCK: Right. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I nearly got clipped getting out of my development with my grandson in the back seat of the car and I sure would not want to (indiscernible) ever report that to my children, God forbid. MR. TREBILCOCK: Right. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: But that's how serious this traffic situation is. When I left my home tonight to come here, it took me quite awhile before I could get out of my development. And the traffic in that right-hand lane that is heading out east to Ave Maria to (indiscernible) to the casino, 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) all of that, that is very heavy traffic. MR. TREBILCOCK: Right. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And for that reason, I would ask the county officials to really be very careful as they plot this because one of the other gentlemen in the audience had said about an access to go out the other way, and that might not fit with your wanting to sell your development, but that was one of the reasons why we asked. When you took that 15-foot buffer and you're talking about -- we asked about sound, how high the trees, how high the homes are going to go, what about the blasting within how many feet, and the things that have gone on that we've already experienced that we also say if you (indiscernible) that other roadway, I know you're going out towards Pebblebrook, but if you did it even as an exit out (indiscernible) it would give us a greater buffer. It would give everybody more access. And then put the one that you're talking about across from Pebblebrook only as an entrance, and definitely probably with a traffic light, because I mean, otherwise, it's going to create, you know, a lot of stuff going on. You want to be approved for 400 units, possibly. And that's probably a minimum 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) of two cars per unit. Could be four cars per unit. So you put a lot of traffic there just on the residential side, not to mention how many people you're going to draw for the shopping center for the commercial work that you want to do. So I really hope that this is very carefully planned as far as from the county to give us enough egress, ingress, access safety and the whole picture because it's clearly a very developed, growing area as it is, and the homeowners definitely -- I'm a homeowner in Tuscany Cove, and we definitely have concerns from the (indiscernible) to how we're going to be affected, how inconvenienced, what the access is during the build and everything else. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Sure. MR. TREBILCOCK: (Indiscernible) We work -- again, we'll work with the county staff. They do look at the accesses and then even the traffic data, they actually monitor that data so that we use data that the county has collected, so, you know, it's always apples to apples when we look at things. But, yes. Thank you. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: You might want to take a look at (indiscernible) the car accidents 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) that have already occurred at Collier Boulevard. There's been a few bad ones. MR. ARNOLD: Other questions, comments? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I just want to mention one thing. If, in fact, you do get an anchor store like Lowe's or Home Depot, a lot of people don't realize it, but they -- the deliveries come at 2 a.m. in the morning. That's when they -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Beep, beep, beep, beep, beep. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That's something we have to consider about the buffer zone. (Indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: (Indiscernible) understood. Anybody else? Any other questions? Yes, ma'am? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I had another commitment, so I was here a little late. Am I understanding right that they're saying on Collier Boulevard that sidewalk that's big enough for walking and biking would not go all the way to Immokalee Road heading north? MR. ARNOLD: No. I think the comment was the pathway that's in the county's right-of-way is planned to stay. There's no plan to remove it. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay. But it will extend all the way to Immokalee Road? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes. It's there. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It will stay? MR. ARNOLD: I think so. I'm pretty sure, yes, it's in the county right-of-way. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Because you really need that. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MR. ARNOLD: (Indiscernible) quite good. One at a time, please. We're trying to (indiscernible) one at a time, please. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: You really need that to be able to cross at that stoplight to get across when you are walking to the shopping center. MR. ARNOLD: Right. David, do you know any more specifically about that, the pathway? MR. GENSON: No. (Indiscernible). There's not a pathway the county is going to require us to (indiscernible) but I'm pretty sure that the pathway that's there, it's within their existing right-of-way. MR. ARNOLD: Right. 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) MR. GENSON: Yeah. And there's a (indiscernible). We don't have opportunity to change that. MR. ARNOLD: Right. Yes, ma'am -- I saw another question, somebody? Yes, sir? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah. Just a comment. In the morning, coming west, heading west on Immokalee, when you get (indiscernible) I understand they've just redone this and haven't opened it yet. I guess they're going to have three lanes to take a left turn. Prior to that -- and we'll see how that works out, prior to that, I think the traffic would back up to a point where your entrance, okay, that you had shown on the other sheet, would be impossible to get into, all right. And I think what would happen, then, ultimately, people who would want to take a left would probably want to cut through your -- rather than wait for the light on Collier, they're going to cut through your place. And then that would have a bearing. If you have a light going out of that Collier, okay, what would happen is people 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) would use that as a cut-through in the morning rather than going through -- MR. ARNOLD: Sure. Well, I think that's why the county has told us -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So the placement of your access roads and whether there's lights or not, that could have a big bearing -- MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: -- on what happens on the (indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: I think the county expects that. So they want our project to be designed to allow some cut-through traffic to occur. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Some cut-through is okay (indiscernible) out there. MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It is backed up now. MR. ARNOLD: Sure. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And your straight lane and through lanes are backed up a lot of times in the morning now. Hopefully, it will be straightened out when you get that third lane opened. MR. ARNOLD: (Indiscernible). Anybody else? 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Well, thank you all very much for coming out and make sure you get Sharon's card if you'd like to stay plugged in with us (indiscernible). Sir, if I could get your information, I'll -- (End of recording.) 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I, Joyce B. Howell, do hereby certify that: 1. The foregoing pages numbered 1 through 48 contain a full, true and correct transcript of proceedings in the above-entitled matter, transcribed by me to the best of my knowledge and ability from a digital audio recording. 2. I am not counsel for, related to, or employed by any of the parties in the above-entitled cause. 3. I am not financially or otherwise interested in the outcome of this case. DATED: October 24, 2017 SIGNED AND CERTIFIED: ________________________ Joyce B. Howell 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Attachment E (2 of 2) Transcript-Pelican Nursery PUD 10-18-17 NIM (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Bent Creek Preserve Homeowners Association, lnc. 9350 Bronwood Place, Naples, Florida 34120 April 5, 2019 Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner Growth Management Department-Zoning Div. Collier County 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Baumgarten MPUD- Petition S PL 2017-76A Dear Ms. Gundlach: The Bent Creek Preserve Homeowners Association ("Association") represents the interest of the residents of the Bent Creek Preserve ("BCP") community. Asthe Association's President lwanted to pass on to you, concerns the Association has with the proposed Baumgarten MPUD being considered for development by the County. We have relied upon materials available from the County's website in formulating these community concerns. 1. Potential Full lnterconnect with Bent Creek Preserve: Understandin g it is the County's policy under FLUE Policy 7.3 to have interconnections between adjolning neighborhoods and the Baumgarten MPUD Master Plan, Exhibit "C" (rev . 3/ L7/2o791 shows a potential interconnect; the Association objects to this requirement. Bent Creek Preserve is a Bated community with private roads and sidewalks. Our residents have bought homes in the community knowing that the access is controlled and restricted. Accordingly, we feel the two dlfferent land uses do not warrant a full, open connection and the Association will not allow for uncontrolled interconnection. The Association would request to be allowed, without additional PUD permitting, to install vehicle & pedestrian gates with BCP resident-only access control at such interconnect, if a connection is ultimately required by the County. 2. Buffers along Baumsa rten's Eastern ProDerty Line: it is our understandi ng that the county Development Code requires a 15'wide Type B buffer along the applicant's eastern property line The Applicant's Master Plan, Exhlbit c (rev. 3/tL/20791reflects this landscape buffer. The code definition for Type B Buffer states in parl, "which moy include o woll, fence, hedge, berm or combinotion thereof'. The Association is requestinB that Baumgarten MPUD be required to include a 5'high masonry/concrete panel wall in the required Type B buffer, for the 870 feet of the common property line between Baumgarten and Bent creek Preserve where the change in use abuts our residential units. The remaining common property boundary is adjacent to a BcP conservation easement area. The Association does not believe that having only a landscape 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) BCP HOA letter to Gundlach April 5, 2019 Page 2 of 2 3. Mixed Use Commercial Land Use Adiacent to the Bent Creek Preserve: The Exhibit B Development Standards dated 3/tl/2019, shows a "Minimum Yard- from Eastern Project Boundany'' of 50 feet. The Association concurs with the County staff recommendation that the requirement be 50 foot setback plus one additional foot for each one foot increase of building height above 50 feet. Accordingly, a 65' high building will require a 65' setback. 4. Special Conditions: The Association agrees with the Special Conditions, dared 3hL/2O79, included wlth the Baumgarten MPUD submittal (copy attached). Thank you for the opportunity to provide the Association's comments concerning the Baumgarten MPUD submittal. lf you have any question or need additional information, please feel free to contact me. My phone is 239-225-2L!4. Sincerely, David Caldwell President planting for the buffer separating the Bent Creek Preserve single family homes from the Baumgarten commercial or multifamily residential uses is adequate to protect the privacy and security for the Association's members. 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) I Ii/L-HERITAGE BAY MPUD COUMERCIAL l__ - | t --,1,? t-----1J-f t----\ I I I BEMT CREEK PRESERVE PUD RESIDENT1AL E 3 RICHLANO li it r! li!I N i R R I TUSCAI.IY COr'E PUD RESIDENIAL :- tE€E PUO Exrrin r, rElr 3"l)SCALE: l'= 30o' ffii[EimD rrxEI at I&GENDB = DEVIATION Z ACTMITY CENTER U @ GradvMinor .!.h.lEir.ie{F.n.-n.Ir.a,.rdd BAUACARTEN YPUD FEvrsEo 0.)/r r /2or 9 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) U. RESIDENTIAT: SPS-Same as Principal Structure 8H - Building Helght (zoned height) '1- Minimum separation between adiacent dwelling units, If detached, shall be 1d. '2 - Front yards shall be measured from back ol curb {if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed) for prlvate streets or drlves, and from ROW llne for any public roadway. Slngle-family front entry garages shall have a 23' setback from back of sidewalk. i3 - AII landscape Buffer Easements and/or Lake Malntenance Easements shall be located within open space $acts or lake tracts and not be within a residential lot. Where a home site abuLs a Landscape Buffer Easement or Lake Maintenance Easement withln open space tracts or lake tracts, the accessory structure setback on the residential lot may be reduced to zero (0) feet where lt abuts the easement. *4 - When not located in a residential building within the "R' tract. 15 - Does not apply to passlve recreational uses such as trails/pathways. *5 - Community structures such as guardhouses, gatehouses, funces, walls, columns, decoratlve architectural features, streetscape, passive pa*s and access control skuctures shall have no required setbach except as listed below, and are permitted throughout the "R" designated areas of the PUD; however such strudures shall be located such that they do not cause vehicular stacking lnto the road right-of-way or create site distance lssues for motorlsts and pedestrians. PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE *6 TOWNHOUSE (PER UNIT) MUITI.FAMILY AMENITY AREA +4 Minimum Lot Area r-440 sF 43,560 SF N/A Minimum Lot Width 18 feet N/A N/e Minimum Lot Depth 80 feet N/A N/A Minimum Front Yard Setback 20 feet *2 20 feet *2 15 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 0/10 feet *1 0/10 feet *1 15 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 15 feet Minimum Preserve Setback 25 feet 25 feet Minimum PUD Boundary Setback 50 feet *5 Maximum Building Height Zoned Actual 55 feet 65 feet 25 feet 35 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings 20 feet 20 feet N/A Floor Area Minimum, per unit 750 SF Minimum Front Yard Setback +2 15 feet 15 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet L0 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback *3 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Preserve Setback 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum PUD Boundary Setback 15 feet 15 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings 0/10 feet 0/10 feet N/e Maximum Height Zoned Actual 35 feet 40 feet 3 5 feet 40 feet 25 feet 30 feet B a,Mgqten MP UD F-xh .1-F-rev6. docx Pagc 9 of 19 March 11, 2019 15 feet 15 feet 25 feet 50 feet 50 feet 45 feet 50 feet 684 SF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES *6 .:.n Minimum Side Yard Setback 15 feet 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 5. SPECIAL CONDITIONS a No adult orientated sales are permitted. b. For commercial uses, outdoor music and televisions shall be limited to the areas that are a minimum of 500 feet from the southern and eastern PUD boundaries. There will be no outdoor amplified sound between the hours of 10 p.m. and 8 a.m. weekdays and 12 a.m. and 8 a.m on weekends. c. Dumpsters shall be oriented as far away from residential units as possible. d. Delivery bays shall not abut external residential development. e. Service bays related to automobile service and repair shall be located so that they do not face any external residential district within 1500 feet. f. All pole lighting located in Amenity Areas shall be limited to flat full cutoff shields. Bamrgotzn MP|ID bh A-F revd.dru Pagc 19 of 19 March ll,2019 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) GundlachNancy From: Sent To: Subject: mary.pici@verizon.net Wednesday, April 3,20'19 1Z:24 PM GundlachNancy Baumgarten PUD Dear Ms. Gundlach, We would like to express our opposition to the rezoning of the Baumgarten MPUD. We own three single family homes in Tuscany Cove development which borders this property. We are not opposed to the development of this parcel but are opposed to the current plan. We will be out of town on April 18, 2019 and, therefore, will be unable to attend the meeting. Our concerns are as follows: 1. The Tuscany Cove development borders the proposed site. The proposal calls for 10 buildings of 40 units each that were originally in the center of the site with a small lake between our communities. lt now appears that the 10 buildings have been moved to the Tuscany Cove border with the lake in the middle. This change was made at the last minute and the public documents do not even show the exact placement of these buildings. The height of these proposed buildings is another variance and will negatively impact on our property values as well as the enjoyment of our properties. 2. The Baumgarten parcel is approximately the size of Tuscany Cove which has under 300 one story, single family homes. The proposed development appears to be too dense with 400 living units on about 1/3 of the property and extensive commercial development on the remainder. lt is not clear from the public plans how the parking and traffic from all this development will be handled. The location of the roadways and buildings in the residential area is not shown. As it is now, residents of our community have difficulty entering and exiting our community. There have been numerous accidents at the corner of lmmokalee and Collier with 3 deaths in the last year. The density of this proposed development will negatively impact this situation. Again, we are not opposed to the change from Rural Agricultural to Mixed Use Planned Development as long as it is developed in a responsible manner that does not negatively impact our property values and enjoyment of our preexisting properties. Thank you for your time. Joseph and Mary Pici 15306 Cortona Way Naples, FL 34120 1 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Gund lach Nan cy From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: BellowsRay Monday, April 1,2019 6:21 PM GundlachNancy BosiMichael FW: Proposed Development at SE Corner of lmmokalee Rd. & Collier BIvd. R.t FYI From: KarlFry <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, April 01,2019 11:53 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray. Bellows@colliercountyf l.gov> Subject: Fw: Proposed Development at SE Corner of lmmokalee Rd. & Collier Blvd. Hi Ray, Please distribute as you see fit. Hope you are well! Regards, Ka rl Roymond V. Bellows, Zoning Monoger Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Monogement Deporlment Telephone : 239.252.24 63i F ox: 239.252.63 50tu Exceeding expeclotions, every doy! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at httos://ooo.ol/exivoT. Korl Fry Collier County Planning Commission, oistrict 3 1 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) From: Terry Kennedy <tkennedv@ide astraining.com> Sent: Thursday, March 28,2019 2:05 PM To: KarlFry Subject: Re: Proposed Development at SE Corner of lmmokalee Rd. & Collier Blvd Hello Karl, Thank you for your response and preferred email address to reach you, I will pass on that information. Yesterday, I received contact emails that were published (l do not have the source) from another Tuscany Cove resident/owner who has been organizing petitions regarding our communit/s serious concerns with this high density development proposed to break ground adjacent to our homes and our small set-back area. BIW, an overwhelming maiority of owners/residents have signed these petitions and many have sent letters similar to mine imploring the Planning Board and Commissioners to seriously consider the negative impact to our community. Thank you for reading my email, please seriously consider our concerns and forward to the appropriate Board and Commission members. We look forward to hearing back from you with any updates. Thank you in advance Best Regards, Terry Kennedy Emoil: TK€nnedy@l DEASIraininB.com From: Karl Fry <karlfry@comcast. net> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 6:54 AM To:'Terry Kennedy' <tkennedv@ideastraining.com> Cc: <Karl.Fry@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Proposed Development at SE Corner of lmmokalee Rd. & Collier Blvd. Hi Terry, Thanks for the info you have provided. I do try to take all aspects of any proposed development into account. l'm replying to you and my official Collier County email address. Please use that address moving forward. Helps me separate ccPc official business from spam and other personal emails... Curious, how did you come to email my personal address? My county email is on the CCPC website. lf there's a link to my personal address that's been overlooked, would appreciate knowing... Regards, 2 Karl .2391777-3962 Karl.Frv@colliercountvfl.sov 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) From: Terry Kennedy <tken n ed v@ ideastra in in e. co m> Sent: Wednesday, March 27 ,2019 5:27 PM To: StanChrzanowski @colliereov.net;JoseohSchmitt@colliersov.net: KarenHomiak@collier gov. net; dearborn ohnrwood.com karlfrv@comcast.n et Ma rkstrain@collier gov,net;EdwinFrv er @ colliersov.net Cc: eastmath@collierschools.com;n na. Fia la colliercount@ vfl.so Burt Sa unders @ colliercount vfl.go ill.McDaniel colliercoun Pennv.Tavlor@colliercountvf l.eov; Andv.Solis@colliercountyf l.gov; gbfahmv@aol.com Subject: Proposed Development at SE Corner of lmmokalee Rd. & Collier Blvd. ATTN: Collier County Planning Commission CC: The Board of Commissioners of Collier County RE: Proposed Development at SE Corner of lmmokalee Rd. & Collier Blvd. From: one of many Concerned Property Owners and Taxpayers Date: March 27 ,2Ot9 Due to: extreme traffic congestion and intersection hazards-resulting in loss of life, netative impact to Collier County environment, negative impact to neighboring established single-story community, Tuscany Cove, and unnecessary overly-increased density, tt is impemtlve thalt there NOT be multi-story unlts bullt on the 5tr-56 acres located at the sourh East corner of Colller Blvd & lmmokalee Road (previously Pelican Nursery).e PLEASE REJECT Sranting height variances above two (standard heiSht) stories on ANY proposed structures on said parcel. . PTEASE REJECT high density or increased density variances for said parcel abutting our development,o PLEASE RETECT any other requested or pending variances that would further impact and harm our expected quality of life and environmental safety. Please LISTEN to and seriously consider the VALID CONCERNS of your Collier County Taxpaying Customers (owners and renters, taxpayers and citizens), Please see PETITIONS submitted to Collier County Commissionerc in February ond Morch 2079lrom Tuscdny Cove. See synopsis below ond previous letter sent ond dttoched (February 25, 2019) February 25, 2019 To: The Board of Commissioners of Collier County: Burt L Saunders (District 3) Vice Chairman Donna Fiala (District 1) Andy Solis Esq. (District 2) William L. McDaniel (District 5) Chairman Mike Bosi :Zoning Director Penny Taylor (District 4) RE: PUDZ-P120170000768, Pelican Nursery Mixed-use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Dear Board of Commissioners, D 3 Recently, via petition, the residents and property owners of Tuscany Cove have brought to your attention the many concerns that our community has with the proposed PUD rezone application for commercial and residential development of the 54-56 acres located at the South East corner of Collier Blvd & lmmokalee Road, the site where Pelican Nursery had been for many years. Thank vou in advance for vour time and selious deliberation on thiS matter. 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 1. PLEASE SAY "NO" to HlcH DENS IW, MULTI.STORY DEV ELOPMENT The COMMISSIONERS SHOULD HOtD A,Vy CURRENTLY PLANNED and FUTURE PROPOSEO PROJECT at the corner of lmmokalee Rd. and Collier Blvd to the CORRECT LlMlTS, PROPER ZONTNG RESTR|CT|ONS, and UTMOST SAFETy CONCERNS, The proposed 400 multi-family residential units, a possible 1OO-150 room hotel, medical offices, restaurants, any other commercial entities would overwhelm and NEGATI VELY IMPACT our alreadv heavilv saturated & trafficked area. PLEASE: Do not proceed - without the FUtl CONSIDERATION of U the impact of the heavily increased traffic, or 2) enough improvement to the surrounding infrastructure to accommodate such growth, or 3) the detrimental effect on our quality of life. Developing and expanding the density of structures on the SE corner of lmmokalee Rd. and Collier Blvd. would compound the already serious traffic problem. This is UNSAFE and unacceptable to us as citizens who moved this far out east to be away from the gridlock of Tamiami Trail, and the skyscrapers and multi-story/multi-unit developments closer to the Gulf. When daily life becomes a hardship of this degree, the result is that the very people (ond resulting S dollors)lhat Collier County government has already attracted here may very well choose another, more desirable, safer area to live and work. BAD WORD OF MOUTH is not something we can afford. The rcsultont loss ol LLFE, time, rcputdtion, and money is not worth it, is it? 2. PLEASE REVIEW /IMPROVE TRAFFIC FLOW and SAFEW a t U-turns, esDeciallv At ENIRANCE OF TUSCANY COVE and at lhe moior intersection of lmmokalee Rd. and Collier Blvd. The recent change in allowing U-TURNS At thE ENTRANCE OF TU NY COVE TO HEAD NORTH MAKES EXITING AND ENTERING OUR COMMUNIW EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. The traffic heading north on Collier Blvd is OFTEN BACKED UP from lmmokalee Road to our entrance and exit, which creates severe bottlenecks, gridlock, and increasing accidents. The reports of at least 202 ACCIDEN e fatal - over the last two years, at the lntersection of Collier Blvd and lmmokalee Road (ond the most recent trogic fatol accident of a young mother ond small child), are most OISTURBING. Even in the "off" season, there have been daily serious bottlenecks as well as frequent accidents/incidents. This results in very congested and dangerous intersections, including at the ingress/egress to our small community. One of the main reasons we purchased in Tuscany Cove was because our communitv was NOT built on a corner intersection; yet, because of re-routing and dangerous U-turns, we have experienced increased vehicular traffic from the many commercial businesses and lhe mdjor intersection of lmmokalee Rd. and Collier Blvd., as if we were a major intersection. This is NOT SAFE URBAN PIANNING. With the very busy Emergency Room at the NE corner, a life-death hazardous situation can occur, when ambulances and other em ersencv vehicles (ond residents/visitors in their own vehicles who ore trying to get to the hospitol)have increasing difficulty getting throu8h the gridlock! For the sake of our local community's safety and security - as well as the future positive "lifestyle" image (and bottom line preservotion/ of Naples, Collier County, PLEASE RUECT granting variances on increased density and building height above two stories and for ANY proposed structures abutting our development. Please do not allow this slipperv slope of ouick-income, detrimental urban plannins that is NOT lN THE BEST INTEREST of our citizens, tourists, and upscale businesses who have alreadv invested in our communitv. This is unbecoming to our treasured "lifestyle" that brought us here in the first place. Word of mouth travels fast, and as many of us are not originally from "around here", it is imperative that those in power in government understand the needs of our existing citizens and protect the positive reputation of Naples. 4 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) The residents and owners of Tuscany cove and adiacent e,xrsting communities are couNTlNG oN you, Commissioners, to have the foresight to represent and defend our positive community interests-for the health and safety of Collier County's future. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Respectfully, Terry Kennedy, owner, Tuscany Cove unit 15501. Cortona Way, Naples, FL 34120 Former publisher/editot, N o ples G uide magazine Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. lf you do not want your e-mail address released in response lo a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. lnstead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 5 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) GundlachNa ncy From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: BosiMichael Tuesday, April 2, 2019 8:'13 AM GundlachNanry FW: PUDZ-P120170000768, Pelican Nursery Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MpUD) Tuscany Cove petition contd. scan petition paft2 - 4 2 2019.pd1 fvi From: Boutin, Gary <9ary. boutin@sap.com> Sent: Tuesday, April2,2079 7:54 AM To: FialaDonna <Donna. Fiala@colliercountyfl.gov>; SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaundersBu rt <Burt.Saunders@colliercouotyfl.gov>; TaylorPenny <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov>; McDanielBill <Bill. McDaniel@colliercou ntyfl.gov>; BosiMichael <Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov>; ma rkstrain@collier.gov; HomiakKaren <Ka ren. Homiak@colliercou ntyfl.gov>; KarlFry <Karl. Fry@colliercountyfl.gov>; FryerEdwin <Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark <Ma rk.Strain @colliercountyfl.gov>; Chrzanowskistan <Sta n.Chrzanowski@colliercountyfl.gov>; SchmittJoseph <Joseph.Schmitt@colliercountyfl.gov>; eastmath@collierschools.com; pdearborn@johnrwood.com Cc: Gregory Paquette <gpaquette@uri.edu>; gbfahmy@aol.com; lpdifusco@aol.com; jtaglietta@aol.com Subject: PUDZ-P120170000768, Pelican Nursery Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUDlTuscany Cove petition contd.' Tuscany Cove HOA and Community of Residents 150?6 Toscana Way, Naples,Fl 34120 239-348-9650 To: The Collier County Planning Commissioners: Karen Homiak, Patrick llearborn, Karl Fry, Edwin Fryer, Mark Strain, Stan Chrzanowski, Joseph Schmitt; and : The Collier County Commissioners: Donna Fiala, Andy Solis, Burt Saunders, Penny Taylor, Bill McDaniel and: Director of Zoning, Mike Bosi 1 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) RE: PUDZ-PL20I70000768 (Pelican Nursery Mixed Use plannert developmcnt) Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, On March 15,20t9 we emailed you our 2 PAGE PETITION LETTER with 9 pages of l3l signatures from our VERY CONCERNED TIJSCANY COVE RESTDENTS. Today we ore enclosing an additional 4 pages of 50 * more signatures from OUR VERY CONCERNED RESIDENTS along with another copy ofour pctition letter for your convenience. Again, we thank you in advance for taking our many concerns into your considerations snd we look forward to sceing you ot your Apri! tE,2Ol9 Planning Com mission lfearing, Respectfully, The Concernerl Residents of Tuscanv Cove Gary J Boutin ossp HCM Cloud Operalions 53 State Street Boston, MA 02109 T 617-7't5-7346 com Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. lf you do nol want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. lnstead, contact this oflice by telephone or in writing. E \^l ')irl:7U3r'., 2 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Tuscany Cove HOA & Commrmity of 294 Single Family Homes 15076 Toscana Way Naples, Fl 34120 239-348-96s0 To The Board of Commissioners of Collier Countv: Donna Fiala (District I ) Andy Solis Esq. (District 2) Burt L Saunders (District 3) Vice Chairman Penny Taylor (District 4) William L. McDaniel (District 5) Chairman And Mike Bosi : Zoning Director RE: PUDZ-PL20I70000768, Pelican Nusery Mixed-use Plarured Unit Development (MPUD) February 19,2019 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, We, the residents of Tuscany Cove want to bring to your attention the many concerrs that our community has with the proposed PUD rezone application for commercial and residential development ofthe 54-56 acres located at the South East comer of Collier Blvd & Immokalee Road., the site where Pelican Nursery had been. We are concemed that the proposed 400 multi-family residential units, plus a possible 100-150 room hotel, medical offices, restaurants, etc; will overwhelm this already heavily saturated & tafficked area- Injust the past several years we have had the growth of9 residential developments being: Compass Landing, Canopy, Tuscany Point, Bucks Run, & Raffia Preserve offof Collier Blvd between Vanderbilt Beach Road and Immokalee Road; as well as Bent Creek & LaMorada on Immokalee Road just east of this proposed development and Esplanade and Addison Place on Immokalee Roadjust West of Collier Blvd. We have also seen the addition of NCH Northeast Emergency Room, and Medical Offices, Diagnostics and Rehabilitation, C.V.S. Pharmacy, assorted Restaurants, Businesses, and Retail Outlets at the Northeast comer of Immokalee Road & Collier Blvd. There have been 202 accid€nts at the Intersection of Collier Blvd and Immokalee Road between January l, 2017 and January 2019, and that most recent tragic accident last month, where a young mother and small child died. As a community of very concerned citizens, we have reached out to the Collier County Sheriffs Dept and to 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) F.I.R.E.S. Florida's Integrated Report Exchange System, due to our deep concems. The recent change in allowing U-Tums at the Entrance of our Community to head North has made exiting our community downright dangerous; as well as the traflic heading north on Collier Blvd at times is backed up from Immokalee Road to our entrance and exit. We are getting all olthe traffic coming out the Shoppe's Of Pebblebrook, Publix and Walgreen's al the Southwest Comer of Collier Blvd & Immokalee Road. The traffic that has to exit south on Collier BIvd, gets into that left tuming lane to U-Tum North. At times that faffic builds up beyond what the turning lane can accommodate and comes to a standstill in that regular left lane, as more traffic keeps coming fiom the east and west of Immokalee Rd onto Collier Blvd. In addition to our serious traffic concems; we would like the commissioners to hold this project to the correct and current zoning restrictions; rather than granting variances with regard to the height of the proposed structures, abutting our development, the width or lack of width of the roadways, etc; that would negatively impact our community. It is our plea to each ofyou to come here to see for you$elf. A picture they say is worth a thousand words, but a little driving in and out ofour development and shopping plazas, would help you greatly to r,rnderstand our deep concems for safety. Seeing a drawing ofa Massive Rollercoaster and riding on one are two very different things. We are a mixed community ofvery young, school age, working age & senior aged families. The greater majority of our community live here full tine. Our number one concem is to safely go to school, to work, buy groceries, and go to our doctors, dentists, parks, libraries, etc and safely retum home each day. Thanking you for your time and many considerations given this matter; we remain, the VERY CONCERNED TUSCANY COVE RESIDENTS Please weigh our concems thoroughly and thoughtfirlly, just as you would if it was where you or your family lived. 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) /ttp,tt zuOtgQL- bybhl A-a,n tr,twSdl- hh bhl [CSus'bet'brz) ?bt28? PT14)S cnqNo . o, )7v w5/a/b3 Yt,/{@ sLLle[n I sa1 +( VJU o71)N oarVPr SOJ- LL 9 s -s Ftt 'q6Fi sqoL /v rntr,Vxal l9b 'WO/tul lYs +\o |\\v\q>ol- w>aaxN ^Y Y70€ 4'.ry )N\l\rd\ bzbb-o9,1 *Lt]" q>)^o ?I Lv vht ltw'rryL bhqgl t, r,1 )tl 0-: q WJT ",ll trt<a.D W,J-{v a ,h_ts€.DZ z tg< aLq. '0rd' tQ.QO LOA ..1 q YOC O I o 9.A.2.hPacket Pg. 621Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) '6.rtHro Co 'b-fr"- 37 {?a j_ 27aoc Lzo lt{v 2 9AA d- VqVo (DDO tR2a2 Wc'"L tq15> l-o€4**x.'*v D ; ur>A Hoo4-q zjl-421 'o/-e l &,, /7(6.^,J 1'tl .rtl d *JK ( / <o2-l -r os<r.^t 4 )a/q-, t^A 0 /e ,lur,rr,.I es 3"ob I l*\25 ]os r ^j,+ u) *L.(- u4qfi /) U) JZsePh & tnzz-," 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) * a- k)a fufrazl ./o, /"rir;e 5\bz-r+<rr\^- /3 o bL\oill W4 ,5 /o Gr+"-r* t\d OY 4 z Gqlaoo k),, 8S (-lo2r o /-7--t L{ /LS CrBio,,to- /5 zz7 r7o tf2 tu f L G.l"* tS t)g Gerrr,Uq 7 <nl CDrroAh AA t5l "17 Co t c_ ! I I I 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) L44,/ 2 4{ -Yd3.2fol- Sco tv,o o ; blZ-ff6-3r3{ l-f n I,KA , ai'n qto CANh *| eeaa' e fra sq { 2-47-1'?tr'\Y, Co ( 6s Ft-3<ttz) t^/Ar7-7ftt /d I _la1j Frl t)],,4t( &ad lJo,ua.* crle ,CAN 9.A.2.h Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Attachment F- Petition and Letters of Objection 3-29-19 (2) (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Attachment G - Tuscany Cove Building Heights and Bent Creek Building Heights 3-29-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: Attachment G - Tuscany Cove Building Heights and Bent Creek Building Heights 3-29-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.i Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: Attachment G - Tuscany Cove Building Heights and Bent Creek Building Heights 3-29-19 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) please allow 3 days for processing. bold type FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) LEGAL DESCRIPTION (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID)NUMBER(s)(attach to,or associate with, legal description if more than one) (as applicable, if already assigned) (if applicable) (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP (if applicable) (if applicable) PUDA and GMPA S26 T48 R26 00192360001 and 00192920001 8810 and 9020 Immokalee Road See Attached 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) A FOR STAFF USE ONLY F Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Sharon Umpenhour 239-947-1144 sumpenhour@gradyminor.com 00192920001 00192360001 3/1/2017 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 680Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 8810 and 9020 Immokalee Rd. Naples FL 34120 26 48 26 See Exhibit 2 00192360001 and 00192920001 See attached calculation for summary of uses 235.9 gpm 251,685 GPD 168.5 gpm 179,775 GPD 1st Quarter of 2021 BCHD Partners II, LLC 2600 Golden Gate Naples FL 34105 239-262-2600 DGenson@barroncollier.com 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Attached. Not applicable 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 687Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 688Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 689Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 690Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 691Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 692Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 693Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 707Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=CL# January 30, 2017 LIMS USE: FR - GEORGE EVANS LIMS OBJECT ID: 35290247 35290247 Project: Pace Project No.: RE: George Evans YPC Consulting Group 5931 Country Lakes Drive Suite 3 Fort Myers, FL 33905 Pelican Nursery Dear George Evans: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on January 23, 2017. The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most current, applicable TNI/NELAC standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Mike Valder mike.valder@pacelabs.com Project Manager Enclosures REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 1 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=CP# CERTIFICATIONS Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Ormond Beach Certification IDs 8 East Tower Circle, Ormond Beach, FL 32174 Alabama Certification #: 41320 Connecticut Certification #: PH-0216 Delaware Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity Florida Certification #: E83079 Georgia Certification #: 955 Guam Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity Hawaii Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity Illinois Certification #: 200068 Indiana Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity Kansas Certification #: E-10383 Louisiana Certification #: FL NELAC Reciprocity Louisiana Environmental Certificate #: 05007 Maryland Certification: #346 Michigan Certification #: 9911 Mississippi Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity Missouri Certification #: 236 Montana Certification #: Cert 0074 Nebraska Certification: NE-OS-28-14 Nevada Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity New York Certification #: 11608 North Carolina Environmental Certificate #: 667 North Carolina Certification #: 12710 Oklahoma Certification #: D9947 Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-00547 Puerto Rico Certification #: FL01264 South Carolina Certification: #96042001 Tennessee Certification #: TN02974 Texas Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity US Virgin Islands Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity Virginia Environmental Certification #: 460165 Wyoming Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity West Virginia Certification #: 9962C Wisconsin Certification #: 399079670 Wyoming (EPA Region 8): FL NELAC Reciprocity REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 2 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=SS# SAMPLE SUMMARY Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received 35290247001 SS-1 Solid 01/20/17 11:15 01/23/17 09:45 35290247002 SS-2 Solid 01/20/17 12:10 01/23/17 09:45 35290247003 SS-3 Solid 01/20/17 12:30 01/23/17 09:45 35290247004 SS-4 Solid 01/20/17 12:40 01/23/17 09:45 35290247005 SS-5 Solid 01/20/17 12:50 01/23/17 09:45 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 3 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=SA# SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Lab ID Sample ID Method Analytes Reported LaboratoryAnalysts 35290247001 SS-1 EPA 8081 22 PASI-OJLG EPA 6010 7 PASI-ORVK EPA 7471 1 PASI-OMLO ASTM D2974-87 1 PASI-OMED 35290247002 SS-2 EPA 8081 22 PASI-OJLG EPA 6010 7 PASI-ORVK EPA 7471 1 PASI-OMLO ASTM D2974-87 1 PASI-OMED 35290247003 SS-3 EPA 8081 22 PASI-OJLG EPA 6010 7 PASI-ORVK EPA 7471 1 PASI-OMLO ASTM D2974-87 1 PASI-OMED 35290247004 SS-4 EPA 8081 22 PASI-OJLG EPA 6010 7 PASI-ORVK EPA 7471 1 PASI-OMLO ASTM D2974-87 1 PASI-OMED 35290247005 SS-5 EPA 8081 22 PASI-OJLG EPA 6010 7 PASI-ORVK EPA 7471 1 PASI-OMLO ASTM D2974-87 1 PASI-OMED REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 4 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Sample:SS-1 Lab ID:35290247001 Collected:01/20/17 11:15 Received:01/23/17 09:45 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8081 Preparation Method: EPA 35468081 GCS Pesticides Aldrin 0.00022 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 309-00-201/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00022 1 alpha-BHC 0.00026 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 319-84-601/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00026 1 beta-BHC 0.00029 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 319-85-701/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00029 1 delta-BHC 0.00032 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 319-86-801/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00032 1 gamma-BHC (Lindane)0.00055 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 58-89-901/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00055 1 Chlordane (Technical)0.059 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 57-74-901/24/17 22:050.063 0.059 1 4,4'-DDD 0.00049 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 72-54-801/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00049 1 4,4'-DDE 0.00023 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 72-55-901/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00023 1 4,4'-DDT 0.00036 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 50-29-301/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00036 1 Dieldrin 0.00015 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 60-57-101/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00015 1 Endosulfan I 0.000093 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 959-98-801/24/17 22:050.0063 0.000093 1 Endosulfan II 0.00021 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 33213-65-901/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00021 1 Endosulfan sulfate 0.00016 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 1031-07-801/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00016 1 Endrin 0.00019 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 72-20-801/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00019 1 Endrin aldehyde 0.00025 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 7421-93-401/24/17 22:050.012 0.00025 1 Endrin ketone 0.00030 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 53494-70-501/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00030 1 Heptachlor 0.00015 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 76-44-801/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00015 1 Heptachlor epoxide 0.00041 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 1024-57-301/24/17 22:050.0063 0.00041 1 Methoxychlor 0.0039 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 72-43-501/24/17 22:050.0063 0.0039 1 Toxaphene 0.027 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:32 8001-35-201/24/17 22:050.063 0.027 1 Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S)86 %01/25/17 11:32 877-09-801/24/17 22:0553-140 1 Decachlorobiphenyl (S)95 %01/25/17 11:32 2051-24-301/24/17 22:0543-157 1 Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 30506010 MET ICP Arsenic 0.30 U mg/kg 01/27/17 16:55 7440-38-201/26/17 13:400.60 0.30 1 Barium 0.69 mg/kg 01/27/17 16:55 7440-39-301/26/17 13:400.60 0.30 1 Cadmium 0.030 U mg/kg 01/27/17 16:55 7440-43-901/26/17 13:400.060 0.030 1 Chromium 1.3 mg/kg 01/27/17 16:55 7440-47-301/26/17 13:400.30 0.15 1 Lead 0.66 mg/kg 01/27/17 16:55 7439-92-101/26/17 13:400.60 0.30 1 Selenium 0.45 U mg/kg 01/27/17 16:55 7782-49-201/26/17 13:400.90 0.45 1 Silver 0.15 U mg/kg 01/27/17 16:55 7440-22-4 J(M1), J(R1) 01/26/17 13:400.30 0.15 1 Analytical Method: EPA 7471 Preparation Method: EPA 74717471 Mercury Mercury 0.0049 U mg/kg 01/26/17 19:23 7439-97-601/26/17 09:370.0098 0.0049 1 Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87Percent Moisture Percent Moisture 17.3 %01/27/17 21:210.10 0.10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 5 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Sample:SS-2 Lab ID:35290247002 Collected:01/20/17 12:10 Received:01/23/17 09:45 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8081 Preparation Method: EPA 35468081 GCS Pesticides Aldrin 0.00021 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 309-00-201/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00021 1 alpha-BHC 0.00025 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 319-84-601/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00025 1 beta-BHC 0.00027 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 319-85-701/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00027 1 delta-BHC 0.00031 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 319-86-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00031 1 gamma-BHC (Lindane)0.00053 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 58-89-901/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00053 1 Chlordane (Technical)0.056 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 57-74-901/24/17 22:050.060 0.056 1 4,4'-DDD 0.00047 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 72-54-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00047 1 4,4'-DDE 0.00022 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 72-55-901/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00022 1 4,4'-DDT 0.00034 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 50-29-301/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00034 1 Dieldrin 0.00014 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 60-57-101/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00014 1 Endosulfan I 0.000089 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 959-98-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.000089 1 Endosulfan II 0.00020 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 33213-65-901/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00020 1 Endosulfan sulfate 0.00015 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 1031-07-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00015 1 Endrin 0.00018 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 72-20-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00018 1 Endrin aldehyde 0.00023 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 7421-93-401/24/17 22:050.012 0.00023 1 Endrin ketone 0.00028 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 53494-70-501/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00028 1 Heptachlor 0.00014 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 76-44-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00014 1 Heptachlor epoxide 0.00039 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 1024-57-301/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00039 1 Methoxychlor 0.0037 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 72-43-501/24/17 22:050.0060 0.0037 1 Toxaphene 0.026 U mg/kg 01/25/17 11:51 8001-35-201/24/17 22:050.060 0.026 1 Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S)88 %01/25/17 11:51 877-09-801/24/17 22:0553-140 1 Decachlorobiphenyl (S)96 %01/25/17 11:51 2051-24-301/24/17 22:0543-157 1 Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 30506010 MET ICP Arsenic 0.30 U mg/kg 01/27/17 17:18 7440-38-201/26/17 13:400.61 0.30 1 Barium 0.73 mg/kg 01/27/17 17:18 7440-39-301/26/17 13:400.61 0.30 1 Cadmium 0.030 U mg/kg 01/27/17 17:18 7440-43-901/26/17 13:400.061 0.030 1 Chromium 1.1 mg/kg 01/27/17 17:18 7440-47-301/26/17 13:400.30 0.15 1 Lead 0.85 mg/kg 01/27/17 17:18 7439-92-101/26/17 13:400.61 0.30 1 Selenium 0.46 U mg/kg 01/27/17 17:18 7782-49-201/26/17 13:400.91 0.46 1 Silver 0.15 U mg/kg 01/27/17 17:18 7440-22-401/26/17 13:400.30 0.15 1 Analytical Method: EPA 7471 Preparation Method: EPA 74717471 Mercury Mercury 0.0059 U mg/kg 01/26/17 19:25 7439-97-601/26/17 09:370.012 0.0059 1 Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87Percent Moisture Percent Moisture 17.4 %01/27/17 21:210.10 0.10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 6 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Sample:SS-3 Lab ID:35290247003 Collected:01/20/17 12:30 Received:01/23/17 09:45 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8081 Preparation Method: EPA 35468081 GCS Pesticides Aldrin 0.00020 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 309-00-201/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00020 1 alpha-BHC 0.00024 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 319-84-601/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00024 1 beta-BHC 0.00027 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 319-85-701/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00027 1 delta-BHC 0.00031 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 319-86-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00031 1 gamma-BHC (Lindane)0.00052 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 58-89-901/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00052 1 Chlordane (Technical)0.056 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 57-74-901/24/17 22:050.060 0.056 1 4,4'-DDD 0.00046 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 72-54-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00046 1 4,4'-DDE 0.00021 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 72-55-901/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00021 1 4,4'-DDT 0.00034 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 50-29-301/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00034 1 Dieldrin 0.00014 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 60-57-101/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00014 1 Endosulfan I 0.000088 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 959-98-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.000088 1 Endosulfan II 0.00020 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 33213-65-901/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00020 1 Endosulfan sulfate 0.00018 I mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 1031-07-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00015 1 Endrin 0.00018 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 72-20-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00018 1 Endrin aldehyde 0.00026 I mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 7421-93-401/24/17 22:050.012 0.00023 1 Endrin ketone 0.00054 I mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 53494-70-501/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00028 1 Heptachlor 0.00014 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 76-44-801/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00014 1 Heptachlor epoxide 0.00039 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 1024-57-301/24/17 22:050.0060 0.00039 1 Methoxychlor 0.0037 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 72-43-501/24/17 22:050.0060 0.0037 1 Toxaphene 0.026 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:11 8001-35-201/24/17 22:050.060 0.026 1 Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S)87 %01/25/17 12:11 877-09-801/24/17 22:0553-140 1 Decachlorobiphenyl (S)99 %01/25/17 12:11 2051-24-301/24/17 22:0543-157 1 Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 30506010 MET ICP Arsenic 0.28 U mg/kg 01/27/17 06:38 7440-38-201/26/17 15:480.56 0.28 1 Barium 0.94 mg/kg 01/27/17 06:38 7440-39-301/26/17 15:480.56 0.28 1 Cadmium 0.028 U mg/kg 01/27/17 06:38 7440-43-901/26/17 15:480.056 0.028 1 Chromium 0.88 mg/kg 01/27/17 06:38 7440-47-301/26/17 15:480.28 0.14 1 Lead 0.78 mg/kg 01/27/17 06:38 7439-92-101/26/17 15:480.56 0.28 1 Selenium 0.42 U mg/kg 01/27/17 06:38 7782-49-201/26/17 15:480.85 0.42 1 Silver 0.14 U mg/kg 01/27/17 06:38 7440-22-401/26/17 15:480.28 0.14 1 Analytical Method: EPA 7471 Preparation Method: EPA 74717471 Mercury Mercury 0.0045 U mg/kg 01/26/17 19:28 7439-97-601/26/17 09:370.0090 0.0045 1 Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87Percent Moisture Percent Moisture 17.3 %01/27/17 21:210.10 0.10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 7 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Sample:SS-4 Lab ID:35290247004 Collected:01/20/17 12:40 Received:01/23/17 09:45 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8081 Preparation Method: EPA 35468081 GCS Pesticides Aldrin 0.000058 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 309-00-201/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000058 1 alpha-BHC 0.000069 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 319-84-601/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000069 1 beta-BHC 0.000077 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 319-85-701/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000077 1 delta-BHC 0.000087 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 319-86-801/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000087 1 gamma-BHC (Lindane)0.00015 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 58-89-901/24/17 22:050.0017 0.00015 1 Chlordane (Technical)0.016 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 57-74-901/24/17 22:050.017 0.016 1 4,4'-DDD 0.00013 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 72-54-801/24/17 22:050.0017 0.00013 1 4,4'-DDE 0.000061 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 72-55-901/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000061 1 4,4'-DDT 0.000096 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 50-29-301/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000096 1 Dieldrin 0.000040 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 60-57-101/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000040 1 Endosulfan I 0.000025 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 959-98-801/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000025 1 Endosulfan II 0.000057 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 33213-65-901/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000057 1 Endosulfan sulfate 0.000043 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 1031-07-801/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000043 1 Endrin 0.000052 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 72-20-801/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000052 1 Endrin aldehyde 0.000066 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 7421-93-401/24/17 22:050.0033 0.000066 1 Endrin ketone 0.000080 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 53494-70-501/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000080 1 Heptachlor 0.000039 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 76-44-801/24/17 22:050.0017 0.000039 1 Heptachlor epoxide 0.00011 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 1024-57-301/24/17 22:050.0017 0.00011 1 Methoxychlor 0.0011 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 72-43-501/24/17 22:050.0017 0.0011 1 Toxaphene 0.0074 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:31 8001-35-201/24/17 22:050.017 0.0074 1 Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S)72 %01/25/17 12:31 877-09-801/24/17 22:0553-140 1 Decachlorobiphenyl (S)81 %01/25/17 12:31 2051-24-301/24/17 22:0543-157 1 Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 30506010 MET ICP Arsenic 0.34 I mg/kg 01/27/17 06:18 7440-38-201/26/17 15:480.62 0.31 1 Barium 0.31 U mg/kg 01/27/17 06:18 7440-39-301/26/17 15:480.62 0.31 1 Cadmium 0.031 U mg/kg 01/27/17 06:18 7440-43-901/26/17 15:480.062 0.031 1 Chromium 0.38 mg/kg 01/27/17 06:18 7440-47-301/26/17 15:480.31 0.15 1 Lead 0.31 U mg/kg 01/27/17 06:18 7439-92-101/26/17 15:480.62 0.31 1 Selenium 0.46 U mg/kg 01/27/17 06:18 7782-49-201/26/17 15:480.93 0.46 1 Silver 0.15 U mg/kg 01/27/17 06:18 7440-22-401/26/17 15:480.31 0.15 1 Analytical Method: EPA 7471 Preparation Method: EPA 74717471 Mercury Mercury 0.0040 U mg/kg 01/26/17 19:30 7439-97-601/26/17 09:370.0081 0.0040 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 8 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Sample:SS-4 Lab ID:35290247004 Collected:01/20/17 12:40 Received:01/23/17 09:45 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87Percent Moisture Percent Moisture 1.4 %01/27/17 21:210.10 0.10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 9 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Sample:SS-5 Lab ID:35290247005 Collected:01/20/17 12:50 Received:01/23/17 09:45 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8081 Preparation Method: EPA 35468081 GCS Pesticides Aldrin 0.00020 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 309-00-201/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00020 1 alpha-BHC 0.00024 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 319-84-601/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00024 1 beta-BHC 0.00027 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 319-85-701/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00027 1 delta-BHC 0.00030 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 319-86-801/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00030 1 gamma-BHC (Lindane)0.00051 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 58-89-901/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00051 1 Chlordane (Technical)0.055 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 57-74-901/24/17 22:050.059 0.055 1 4,4'-DDD 0.00045 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 72-54-801/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00045 1 4,4'-DDE 0.00021 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 72-55-901/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00021 1 4,4'-DDT 0.00033 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 50-29-301/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00033 1 Dieldrin 0.00014 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 60-57-101/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00014 1 Endosulfan I 0.000086 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 959-98-801/24/17 22:050.0059 0.000086 1 Endosulfan II 0.00020 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 33213-65-901/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00020 1 Endosulfan sulfate 0.00015 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 1031-07-801/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00015 1 Endrin 0.00018 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 72-20-801/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00018 1 Endrin aldehyde 0.00023 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 7421-93-401/24/17 22:050.011 0.00023 1 Endrin ketone 0.00028 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 53494-70-501/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00028 1 Heptachlor 0.00013 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 76-44-801/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00013 1 Heptachlor epoxide 0.00038 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 1024-57-301/24/17 22:050.0059 0.00038 1 Methoxychlor 0.0036 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 72-43-501/24/17 22:050.0059 0.0036 1 Toxaphene 0.025 U mg/kg 01/25/17 12:50 8001-35-201/24/17 22:050.059 0.025 1 Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S)79 %01/25/17 12:50 877-09-801/24/17 22:0553-140 1 Decachlorobiphenyl (S)78 %01/25/17 12:50 2051-24-301/24/17 22:0543-157 1 Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 30506010 MET ICP Arsenic 0.52 I mg/kg 01/27/17 06:22 7440-38-201/26/17 15:480.56 0.28 1 Barium 6.9 mg/kg 01/27/17 06:22 7440-39-301/26/17 15:480.56 0.28 1 Cadmium 0.028 U mg/kg 01/27/17 06:22 7440-43-901/26/17 15:480.056 0.028 1 Chromium 12.4 mg/kg 01/27/17 06:22 7440-47-301/26/17 15:480.28 0.14 1 Lead 3.0 mg/kg 01/27/17 06:22 7439-92-101/26/17 15:480.56 0.28 1 Selenium 0.42 U mg/kg 01/27/17 06:22 7782-49-201/26/17 15:480.83 0.42 1 Silver 1.4 U mg/kg 01/27/17 22:27 7440-22-4 1p,D301/26/17 15:482.8 1.4 10 Analytical Method: EPA 7471 Preparation Method: EPA 74717471 Mercury Mercury 0.0046 U mg/kg 01/26/17 19:36 7439-97-601/26/17 09:370.0092 0.0046 1 Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87Percent Moisture Percent Moisture 17.0 %01/27/17 21:210.10 0.10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 10 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. QC Batch: QC Batch Method: Analysis Method: Analysis Description: 346566 EPA 7471 EPA 7471 7471 Mercury Associated Lab Samples:35290247001, 35290247002, 35290247003, 35290247004, 35290247005 Parameter Units Blank Result Reporting Limit Qualifiers METHOD BLANK:1861554 Associated Lab Samples:35290247001, 35290247002, 35290247003, 35290247004, 35290247005 Matrix:Solid AnalyzedMDL Mercury mg/kg 0.0040 U 0.0079 01/26/17 18:320.0040 Parameter Units LCS Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers% RecConc. 1861555LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: LCSSpike Mercury mg/kg 0.048 L5.067 71 80-120 Parameter Units MS Result % Rec Limits Qual% RecConc. 1861556MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: MSSpike Result 35289675001 1861557 MSD Result MSD % Rec RPD RPD Max MSDMS Spike Conc. Mercury mg/kg .13 82 80-12089 8 20.120.0069 U 0.11 0.12 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 11 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. QC Batch: QC Batch Method: Analysis Method: Analysis Description: 346616 EPA 3050 EPA 6010 6010 MET Solid Associated Lab Samples:35290247001, 35290247002 Parameter Units Blank Result Reporting Limit Qualifiers METHOD BLANK:1861668 Associated Lab Samples:35290247001, 35290247002 Matrix:Solid AnalyzedMDL Arsenic mg/kg 0.22 U 0.44 01/27/17 16:470.22 Barium mg/kg 0.22 U 0.44 01/27/17 16:470.22 Cadmium mg/kg 0.022 U 0.044 01/27/17 16:470.022 Chromium mg/kg 0.11 U 0.22 01/27/17 16:470.11 Lead mg/kg 0.22 U 0.44 01/27/17 16:470.22 Selenium mg/kg 0.33 U 0.66 01/27/17 16:470.33 Silver mg/kg 0.11 U 0.22 01/27/17 16:470.11 Parameter Units LCS Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers% RecConc. 1861669LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: LCSSpike Arsenic mg/kg 10.211.2 91 80-120 Barium mg/kg 11.311.2 101 80-120 Cadmium mg/kg 1.11.1 100 80-120 Chromium mg/kg 12.011.2 107 80-120 Lead mg/kg 11.211.2 100 80-120 Selenium mg/kg 10.111.2 90 80-120 Silver mg/kg 1.11.1 95 80-120 Parameter Units MS Result % Rec Limits Qual% RecConc. 1861670MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: MSSpike Result 35290247001 1861671 MSD Result MSD % Rec RPD RPD Max MSDMS Spike Conc. Arsenic mg/kg 12.6 88 75-12589 16 2014.80.30 U 11.4 13.4 Barium mg/kg 12.6 100 75-125100 14 2014.80.69 13.3 15.4 Cadmium mg/kg 1.2 97 75-12596 15 201.50.030 U 1.2 1.4 Chromium mg/kg 12.6 106 75-125105 14 2014.81.3 14.6 16.8 Lead mg/kg 12.6 96 75-12598 16 2014.80.66 12.8 15.1 Selenium mg/kg 12.6 85 75-12586 17 2014.80.45 U 10.7 12.8 Silver mg/kg J(M1), J(R1) 1.2 67 75-12573 25 201.50.15 U 0.84 1.1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 12 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. QC Batch: QC Batch Method: Analysis Method: Analysis Description: 346622 EPA 3050 EPA 6010 6010 MET Solid Associated Lab Samples:35290247003, 35290247004, 35290247005 Parameter Units Blank Result Reporting Limit Qualifiers METHOD BLANK:1861684 Associated Lab Samples:35290247003, 35290247004, 35290247005 Matrix:Solid AnalyzedMDL Arsenic mg/kg 0.31 U 0.62 01/27/17 05:540.31 Barium mg/kg 0.31 U 0.62 01/27/17 05:540.31 Cadmium mg/kg 0.031 U 0.062 01/27/17 05:540.031 Chromium mg/kg 0.15 U 0.31 01/27/17 05:540.15 Lead mg/kg 0.31 U 0.62 01/27/17 05:540.31 Selenium mg/kg 0.46 U 0.93 01/27/17 05:540.46 Silver mg/kg 0.15 U 0.31 01/27/17 05:540.15 Parameter Units LCS Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers% RecConc. 1861685LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: LCSSpike Arsenic mg/kg 11.011.3 97 80-120 Barium mg/kg 11.311.3 100 80-120 Cadmium mg/kg 1.21.1 102 80-120 Chromium mg/kg 12.211.3 108 80-120 Lead mg/kg 11.111.3 98 80-120 Selenium mg/kg 10.111.3 89 80-120 Silver mg/kg 1.11.1 97 80-120 Parameter Units MS Result % Rec Limits Qual% RecConc. 1861686MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: MSSpike Result 35290247003 1861687 MSD Result MSD % Rec RPD RPD Max MSDMS Spike Conc. Arsenic mg/kg 16 98 75-12599 2 2016.10.28 U 15.6 15.9 Barium mg/kg 16 105 75-125104 0 2016.10.94 17.7 17.6 Cadmium mg/kg 1.6 105 75-125104 0 201.60.028 U 1.7 1.7 Chromium mg/kg 16 113 75-125113 0 2016.10.88 18.9 19.0 Lead mg/kg 16 104 75-125101 2 2016.10.78 17.3 17.0 Selenium mg/kg 16 92 75-12590 2 2016.10.42 U 14.6 14.4 Silver mg/kg 1.6 92 75-12591 1 201.60.14 U 1.5 1.5 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 13 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. QC Batch: QC Batch Method: Analysis Method: Analysis Description: 346193 EPA 3546 EPA 8081 8081 GCS Pesticides Associated Lab Samples:35290247001, 35290247002, 35290247003, 35290247004, 35290247005 Parameter Units Blank Result Reporting Limit Qualifiers METHOD BLANK:1859291 Associated Lab Samples:35290247001, 35290247002, 35290247003, 35290247004, 35290247005 Matrix:Solid AnalyzedMDL 4,4'-DDD mg/kg 0.00013 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.00013 4,4'-DDE mg/kg 0.000061 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000061 4,4'-DDT mg/kg 0.000096 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000096 Aldrin mg/kg 0.000058 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000058 alpha-BHC mg/kg 0.000069 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000069 beta-BHC mg/kg 0.000077 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000077 Chlordane (Technical)mg/kg 0.016 U 0.017 01/25/17 09:540.016 delta-BHC mg/kg 0.000087 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000087 Dieldrin mg/kg 0.000040 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000040 Endosulfan I mg/kg 0.000025 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000025 Endosulfan II mg/kg 0.000057 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000057 Endosulfan sulfate mg/kg 0.000043 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000043 Endrin mg/kg 0.000052 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000052 Endrin aldehyde mg/kg 0.00011 I 0.0033 01/25/17 09:540.000066 Endrin ketone mg/kg 0.000080 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000080 gamma-BHC (Lindane)mg/kg 0.00015 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.00015 Heptachlor mg/kg 0.000039 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.000039 Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.00011 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.00011 Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.0011 U 0.0017 01/25/17 09:540.0011 Toxaphene mg/kg 0.0074 U 0.017 01/25/17 09:540.0074 Decachlorobiphenyl (S)%96 43-157 01/25/17 09:54 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S)%85 53-140 01/25/17 09:54 Parameter Units LCS Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers% RecConc. 1859292LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: LCSSpike 4,4'-DDD mg/kg 0.015.017 87 71-137 4,4'-DDE mg/kg 0.014.017 86 71-136 4,4'-DDT mg/kg 0.015.017 89 62-140 Aldrin mg/kg 0.014.017 82 67-128 alpha-BHC mg/kg 0.014.017 82 68-130 beta-BHC mg/kg 0.015.017 89 70-130 delta-BHC mg/kg 0.010.017 61 45-123 Dieldrin mg/kg 0.015.017 88 72-132 Endosulfan I mg/kg 0.015.017 88 72-130 Endosulfan II mg/kg 0.015.017 90 72-132 Endosulfan sulfate mg/kg 0.014.017 84 68-130 Endrin mg/kg 0.015.017 87 70-135 Endrin aldehyde mg/kg 0.014.017 83 59-131 Endrin ketone mg/kg 0.016.017 93 69-135 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 14 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. Parameter Units LCS Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers% RecConc. 1859292LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: LCSSpike gamma-BHC (Lindane)mg/kg 0.014.017 83 69-132 Heptachlor mg/kg 0.015.017 87 68-131 Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.015.017 88 69-130 Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.016.017 93 64-139 Decachlorobiphenyl (S)%87 43-157 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S)%74 53-140 Parameter Units MS Result % Rec Limits Qual% RecConc. 1859635MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: MSSpike Result 35290247001 1859636 MSD Result MSD % Rec RPD RPD Max MSDMS Spike Conc. 4,4'-DDD mg/kg .06 94 71-13799 3 40.0590.00049 U 0.058 0.059 4,4'-DDE mg/kg .06 93 71-13698 3 40.0590.00023 U 0.057 0.059 4,4'-DDT mg/kg .06 95 62-140101 4 40.0590.00036 U 0.058 0.061 Aldrin mg/kg .06 89 67-12896 5 40.0590.00022 U 0.055 0.057 alpha-BHC mg/kg .06 89 68-13095 5 40.0590.00026 U 0.054 0.057 beta-BHC mg/kg .06 97 70-130101 3 40.0590.00029 U 0.059 0.060 delta-BHC mg/kg .06 68 45-12371 2 40.0590.00032 U 0.041 0.042 Dieldrin mg/kg .06 95 72-132100 3 40.0590.00015 U 0.058 0.060 Endosulfan I mg/kg .06 95 72-130100 3 40.0590.000093 U 0.058 0.060 Endosulfan II mg/kg .06 98 72-132102 2 40.0590.00021 U 0.060 0.061 Endosulfan sulfate mg/kg .06 93 68-13095 1 40.0590.00016 U 0.057 0.057 Endrin mg/kg .06 95 70-13599 2 40.0590.00019 U 0.058 0.059 Endrin aldehyde mg/kg .06 102 59-13197 8 40.0590.00025 U 0.062 0.058 Endrin ketone mg/kg .06 100 69-135104 2 40.0590.00030 U 0.061 0.062 gamma-BHC (Lindane)mg/kg .06 91 69-13296 3 40.0590.00055 U 0.055 0.057 Heptachlor mg/kg .06 94 68-13199 3 40.0590.00015 U 0.058 0.059 Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg .06 95 69-13099 2 40.0590.00041 U 0.058 0.059 Methoxychlor mg/kg .06 99 64-139105 3 40.0590.0039 U 0.061 0.063 Decachlorobiphenyl (S)%95 43-157101 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S)%85 53-14093 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 15 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. QC Batch: QC Batch Method: Analysis Method: Analysis Description: 347061 ASTM D2974-87 ASTM D2974-87 Dry Weight/Percent Moisture Associated Lab Samples:35290247001, 35290247002, 35290247003, 35290247004, 35290247005 Parameter Units Dup Result Max RPD QualifiersRPDResult 35288898002 1864199SAMPLE DUPLICATE: Percent Moisture %65.6 1 1064.9 Parameter Units Dup Result Max RPD QualifiersRPDResult 35290389011 1864200SAMPLE DUPLICATE: Percent Moisture %39.6 3 1038.2 Parameter Units Dup Result Max RPD QualifiersRPDResult 35290389037 1864201SAMPLE DUPLICATE: Percent Moisture %45.2 7 1042.3 Parameter Units Dup Result Max RPD QualifiersRPDResult 35290389055 1864202SAMPLE DUPLICATE: Percent Moisture %28.0 3 1027.1 Parameter Units Dup Result Max RPD QualifiersRPDResult 35290696001 1864203SAMPLE DUPLICATE: Percent Moisture %30.7 2 1031.4 Parameter Units Dup Result Max RPD QualifiersRPDResult 35291122003 1864204SAMPLE DUPLICATE: Percent Moisture %10.1 J(D6)38 1014.8 Parameter Units Dup Result Max RPD QualifiersRPDResult 35291136002 1864205SAMPLE DUPLICATE: Percent Moisture %1.6 1 101.6 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 16 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=QL# QUALIFIERS Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery DEFINITIONS DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot. ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit. PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit. RL - Reporting Limit. S - Surrogate 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is a combined concentration. Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values. LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - Sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference NC - Not Calculable. SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for each analyte is a combined concentration. Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes. TNI - The NELAC Institute. LABORATORIES Pace Analytical Services - Ormond BeachPASI-O ANALYTE QUALIFIERS The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitation limit. I Compound was analyzed for but not detected. U Analyte was detected in the CCB. All associated samples had concentrations of at least ten times greater than the blank or were below the reporting limit. 1p Sample was diluted due to the presence of high levels of non-target analytes or other matrix interference.D3 Estimated Value. The relative percent difference (RPD) between the sample and sample duplicate exceeded laboratory control limits. J(D6) Estimated Value. Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. J(M1) Estimated Value. RPD value was outside control limits.J(R1) LCS recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on matrix spike recovery within LCS limits.L5 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 17 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) #=CR# QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Pace Project No.: Project: 35290247 Pelican Nursery Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method Analytical Batch 35290247001 346193 346267SS-1 EPA 3546 EPA 8081 35290247002 346193 346267SS-2 EPA 3546 EPA 8081 35290247003 346193 346267SS-3 EPA 3546 EPA 8081 35290247004 346193 346267SS-4 EPA 3546 EPA 8081 35290247005 346193 346267SS-5 EPA 3546 EPA 8081 35290247001 346616 346800SS-1 EPA 3050 EPA 6010 35290247002 346616 346800SS-2 EPA 3050 EPA 6010 35290247003 346622 346801SS-3 EPA 3050 EPA 6010 35290247004 346622 346801SS-4 EPA 3050 EPA 6010 35290247005 346622 346801SS-5 EPA 3050 EPA 6010 35290247001 346566 346630SS-1 EPA 7471 EPA 7471 35290247002 346566 346630SS-2 EPA 7471 EPA 7471 35290247003 346566 346630SS-3 EPA 7471 EPA 7471 35290247004 346566 346630SS-4 EPA 7471 EPA 7471 35290247005 346566 346630SS-5 EPA 7471 EPA 7471 35290247001 347061SS-1 ASTM D2974-87 35290247002 347061SS-2 ASTM D2974-87 35290247003 347061SS-3 ASTM D2974-87 35290247004 347061SS-4 ASTM D2974-87 35290247005 347061SS-5 ASTM D2974-87 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 01/30/2017 12:21 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 110 South Bayview Blvd. Oldsmar , FL 34677 (813)881-9401 Page 18 of 20 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 729Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. 2. 2.1. 2.2. 2.3. 3. 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. 4. 5. 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) )) ) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) o o 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 764Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 821Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 822Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 839Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 851Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 1 COLLIER COUNTY WAIVER APPLICATION FROM THE REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED: _______________ PLANNER: PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE WAIVER: _____________________ (To Be Completed By Zoning and Land Development Review Staff) PROJECT NAME:Pelican Nursery MPUD (PL20170000768) LOCATION:(Common Description) The subject property is located in the southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST:The proposed Pelican Nursery MPUD property is approximately 56± acres, which is currently a plant nursery. The Archaeological Probability Map #4,shows the project is not located in an area that indicates areas of Historical/Archaeological probability.The project is located in Section 26, Township 48 S, Range 26 E. (Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator County Manager or designee to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 2 SECTION ONE: APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DATA A.Name of applicant (s) (if other than property owner, state relationship such as option holder, contract purchaser, lessee, trustee, etc.): BCHD Partners II, LLC Mailing Address: 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples FL 34105 Phone: (239) 262-2600 FAX: _______________________ E-Mail: DGenson@barroncollier.com B.Name of agent(s) for applicant, if any: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Mailing Address: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Phone: 239.947.1144 FAX: 239.947.0375 E-Mail: warnold@gradyminor.com C.Name of owner(s) of property:Tree Plateau Co., Inc. Mailing Address: C/O Gene M. Pranzo, 5637 Strand Blvd., Suite 204 Phone: (239) 262-2600 FAX: _______________________ E-Mail: DGenson@barroncollier.com Note: If names in answers to A and/or B are different than name in C, notarized letter(s) of authorization from property owner (C) must be attached. SECTION TWO:SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA (Attach copy of the plat book page (obtainable from Clerk’s Office at the original scale) with subject property clearly marked.) A.Legal description of subject property. Answer only 1 or 2, as applicable. 1.Within platted subdivision, recorded in official Plat Books of Collier County. Subdivision Name: Plat Book Page Unit Tract Lot Section 26 Township 48S Range 26 E 2.If not in platted subdivision, a complete legal description must be attached which is sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property on County maps or aerial photographs. The legal description must include the Section, Township and 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 3 Range. If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be submitted. B.Property dimensions: Area: __________________ square feet, or 56±acres Width along roadway: 1900± feet (Immokalee Road), 1200± feet (Collier Blvd) Depth: 1194± feet C.Present use of property: Plant Nursery D.Present zoning classification: A, Agricultural SECTION THREE:WAIVER CRITERIA Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been excavated. A.Waiver Request Justification. 1.Interpretation of Aerial Photograph Photo shows property is a plant nursery. 2.Historical Land Use Description: Plant nursery. 3.Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: The site is cleared with vegetated areas along the western, southern and eastern boundaries. 4.Other: . B.The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist.The decision of the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 4 regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION FOUR:CERTIFICATION A.The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this application. Any time delays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal of inaccurate or incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant. B.All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record and shall be a permanent part of the file. C.All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently fold to fit into a legal size (8 ½” x 14”) folder. ______________________________ Signature of Applicant or Agent D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed Name of Applicant or Agent ===================================================================== -TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION- SECTION FIVE:NOTICE OF DECISION The County Manager or designee has made the following determination: Approved on: _____________ By:______________________________ Approved with Conditions on: ____________ By: _____________________________ (see attached) Denied on: _______________By: ______________________________ (see attached) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government.This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check []type of application request (one only): [ ] School Capacity Review [ ] Exemption Letter [ ] Concurrency Determination [ ] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I. Project Information: Project Name: ___________________________________________Municipality: _________________________________ Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): _______________________________________________________ Location/Address of subject property: ____________________________________________________(Attach location map) Closest Major Intersection: _______________________________________________________________________________ II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): _____________________________________________________________________ Agent/Contact Person: ________________________________________________________________________________ (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone#: _____________________________ Fax: _________________________Email_________________________ I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. _____________________________________________________ _____________________________ Owner or Authorized Agent Signature Date _________________________________________________________________________________________ III. Development Information Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation:Proposed Land Use Designation: Current Zoning:Proposed Zoning: Project Acreage: Unit Type:SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: Total Units Proposed by Type: Is this a phased project: Yes or No If yes,please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp:___________________________ Baumgarten MPUD Collier County 00192360001 and 00192920001 8810 and 9020 Immokalee Rd. Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard BCHD Partners II, LLC D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associaties, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239-947-1144 warnold@gradyminor.com August 8, 2017 Mixed Use Activity Center Commercial and Residential A, Agriculture Mixed Use PUD 0 0 400 370,000 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 877Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: -School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; -Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement.For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type;age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18;or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student;or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency Determination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. 3 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Baumgarten MPUD Deviation Justifications 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 884Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 885Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com September 27, 2018 RE:Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) PUDZ-PL20170000768,Pelican Nursery Mixed-use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), n.k.a. Baumgartner MPUD Dear Property Owner: You are invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing BCHD Partners II, LLC (Applican t) on: Tuesday, October 16, 2018, 5:30 pm at BCHD Partners II, LLC is asking the County to approve a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezone application, which proposes to develop a maximum of 370,000 square feet of commercial development , 140 hotel/motel rooms and up to 400 multi-family residential dwelling units. The subject property is comprised of approximately 56± acres, located in the Southeast quadrant of the Collier Boulevard and Immokalee Road intersection in Section 26, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail to: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375,Q. Grady Minor &Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134.Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Sincerely, Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 939Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 940Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 1 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 2 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 3 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 4 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 5 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 6 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 7 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 8 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 9 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 10 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 11 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 12 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 13 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 14 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 15 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 16 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 17 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 18 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 19 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 20 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 21 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 22 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 23 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 24 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 25 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 26 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 27 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 28 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 29 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 30 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 31 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 32 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 975 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 33 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 976 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 34 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 977 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 35 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 36 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 37 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 38 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 39 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 40 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 41 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 42 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 43 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 44 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 45 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 46 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 47 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 48 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 49 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 50 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 51 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 52 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 53 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 996 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Page 54 of 54 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 997 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 998 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 999 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 1000Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.jPacket Pg. 1001Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 1002 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 1003 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 1004 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) 9.A.2.j Packet Pg. 1005 Attachment: Attachment H - [Linked] CCPC Application.pdf 3-29-18 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD) Collier BLVDSage AVE Cortona WAY Immokalee RD S h a d o w Oa k L NPlateau RDLimestone TRL Bellaire Bay DR Toscana WAY Gerva is CIR Spider Lily LNWoodhurst DR V o l t e r r a CTA ddison Place D R Burnt Pine DRSweet Bay LNGoodland Bay DRAddison PlaceCIRTuscany Cove DRRockledge D R Glenforest DR CortonaWAYCollier BLVDToscana WA YBurnt Pine DRT o s cana WAY Immokalee RD Bellaire Bay DR BellaireBayDRImmokalee RD Sweet Bay LNGervais CI RWoodhurst DR Cortona WAYImmokalee RD Pelican Nursery PUD Lidar *ALL GRADES NAVD ¹ Created by: GIS Team - GMDN9/17 0 0.1 0.20.05 Miles LIDAR 2007 <VALUE> 15.6 - 16 15.1 - 15.5 14.6 - 15 14.1 - 14.5 13.6 - 14 13.1 - 13.5 12.6 - 13 12.1 - 12.5 11.6 - 12 11.1 - 11.5 10.6 - 11 10.1 - 10.5 9.6 - 10 9.1 - 9.5 -9.4 - 9 Disclaimer: These lidar maps are provided for internal County government use. They are not intendedto be relied upon by any third parties. 9.A.2.k Packet Pg. 1006 Attachment: Lidar.pdf 9-28-17 (8489 : Baumgarten MPUD)