Loading...
Agenda 04/09/2019 Item #17B04/09/2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by the Board of County Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 97-3, which rezoned the subject property to a Heavy Commercial (C-5) zoning district with conditions, in order to add motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC code 4225, air-conditioned and mini-and self- storage only) as a permitted use, and to increase the maximum building height for that use only, from the presently allowed maximum height of 28 feet to a zoned height of 35 feet and an actual height of 38 feet. The subject property is located on the north side of U.S. 41 East, approximately 1,000 feet east of Collier Boulevard, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2.17± acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20180000125] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff’s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above-referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is located on the north side of U.S. 41 East, approximately 1,000 feet east of Collier Boulevard, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The petitioner is requesting an amendment to amend Ordinance # 97-3, in which the Collier County Board of County Commissioners changed the zoning classification of the subject property from Agricultural “A” to Heavy Commercial “C-5” with certain conditions including precluding all but three C-5 permitted uses. At this juncture, the applicant is requesting a rezoning of C -5 to C-5 in order to amend Ordinance 97-3 to add one additional C-5 use - motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC code 4225, air-conditioned and mini-and self-storage only). The requested rezoning would be a mechanism to amend Ordinance # 97-3 and facilitate the development of approximately 95,300 square- foot, three-story, air-conditioned self-storage facility. The self-storage facility would be built on the subject 2.17-acre property, as well as a small portion of the abutting property to the west (not a part of this rezone). The remaining portion of the originally rezoned property has an existing Tractor Supply store, which will not be affected by this rezoning. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain an adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities . Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed amendment. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any amendment petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. Future Land Use (FLUE): 17.B Packet Pg. 1208 04/09/2019 Staff identified the FLUE policies relevant to this project and determined that the proposed amendment to the PUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Please, see Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Review for a more detailed analysis of how staff derived this determination. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2015 and 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” The proposed Rezone on the subject property was reviewed based on the then applicable 2017 AUIR Inventory Report. The TIS submitted in the application indicates that the proposed Self -Storage Mini- Warehouse use will generate approximately 16 PM peak hour two-way trip, which represents a reduction in the number of potential PM peak hour two-way trips compared to the currently permitted uses as noted in the TIS. Based on the 2017 and 2018 AUIR the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed rezone within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject petition can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental staff has evaluated the petition. No revisions to the environmental conditions of the existing ordinance are being made. The proposal is consistent with the CCME. GMP Conclusion: Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PL20180000125 on February 21, 2019, and by a vote of 7 to 0 recommended to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval, subject to the conditions in the amended ordinance as described in the below “Conditions of Approval.” The underlined language represents changes to the original Ordinance #97-3 conditions of approval. The CCPC approval was unanimous, and 17.B Packet Pg. 1209 04/09/2019 there were no letters of opposition submitted with this petition. As such, this petition will be placed on Summary Agenda. Conditions of Approval 1. The following uses are hereby authorized: b. Unless otherwise provided, all permitted uses in the C-4 general commercial district. c. Building Materials, Hardware, Garden Center (Groups 5211-5261)7, except not permitted on the property described in Exhibit B. d. Building Construction -General Construction and Operative Builders (Groups 15211542b except not permitted on the property described in Exhibit B. e. Construction -Special Trade Contractors (Groups 1711, 1793, 1796, 1799)7, except not permitted on the property described in Exhibit B. f. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, air-conditioned and mini-and self-storage only), on the property described in Exhibit B only. 2. A precast masonry decorative fence six (6) feet high shall be constructed along the property line contiguous to the Woodfield Lakes PUD. 3. No building or buildings materials storage may occur within sixty (60) feet of the contiguous lot line within Woodfield Lakes PUD. 4. No building or structure shall exceed a height of twenty-eight (28) feet, except the maximum zoned height shall be thirty-five (35) feet and the maximum actual height shall be thirty-eight (38) feet for the motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, air-conditioned and mini and self-storage only) use. 5. The wall of any building or structure adjacent to Woodfield Lakes shall be insulated to inhibit noise emissions to said property. 6. Arterial level street lighting shall be installed at the project entrance on U.S. 41 as part of the development of the first phase. 7. The site plan shall be consistent with the requirements of Ordinance 93-64 with respect to turn lanes, minimum throat distances and internal traffic circulation. 8. Substantial competent evidence of the project's ability to accept, detain and treat historic surface runoff from the roadway shall be presented at the time of an application for a Site Development Plan. 9. Any approval for this project shall not vest any right to a median opening, now or in the future, along any project roadway frontage. Access may be constrained to a right- in / right-out only. 10. Subsequent approval of the Site Development Plan shall provide for cross or shared access with properties to the west of this property so that shared access is achieved, leading to Tamiami Trail. 11. The following standards apply only to the motor freight transportation and warehousing use (4225, air-conditioned and mini-and self-storage only), on the property described in Exhibit B: 17.B Packet Pg. 1210 04/09/2019 a. The minimum setback from the northern property line shall be 135 feet. b. Hours of operation shall be from 8:00 am to 9:00 pm. c. Exterior lighting on the rear/north side of building shall be limited to low- level security lighting, shall be mounted to the building, and shall not exceed ten feet in height. d. All self-storage units shall be accessed from the interior of the building. e. The maximum self-storage unit size shall be 200 square feet. f. There shall be no parking on the rear/north side of the building. g. There shall be no functional windows on the rear/north side of the building. h. Loading areas and building access shall be oriented on the west side of the building, and centrally located. 12. The following standard applies only to the portion of the property zoned C-3, abutting the west boundary of the property described in Exhibit B, where the motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, air-conditioned and mini-and self- storage only) loading area, parking and other permitted accessory uses may be located: a. Light fixtures shall be limited to a maximum height of 15 feet. 13. The following requirements apply to the owner of the property described in Exhibit B: a. The owner shall install landscaping required by the LDC on both sides of the wall along the northern property line of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of the proposed Inland Village plat, as more specifically described in Exhibit C, prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for any structures located on Lots 1, 2 and 3 of the proposed Inland Village plat. b. The owner shall paint and maintain good condition of both sides of the wall along the northern property line of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of the proposed Inland Village plat, as more specifically described in Exhibit C. 14. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 15. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. 17.B Packet Pg. 1211 04/09/2019 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Petitioner is requesting a rezone from the C-5 zoning district, limited to certain C-5 uses and subject to conditions, to the C-5 zoning district, with one additional use and subject to additional conditions. The attached staff report and recommendations of the CCPC required are advisory only and are not binding on you. All testimony given must be under oath. The Petitioner has the burden to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below, and you may question Petitioner, or staff, to satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria have been satisfied. Should you consider denying the rezone, to assure that your decision is not later found to be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable, the denial must be based upon competent, substantial evidence that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for Straight Rezones 1. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, a nd policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 2. Will the proposed rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 3. Would the proposed rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 4. Are the existing district boundaries illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change? 5. Do changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary? 6. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 7. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 8. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 9. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 10. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 11. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 12. Will the proposed change constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare? 13. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning? 14. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County? 17.B Packet Pg. 1212 04/09/2019 15. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17. What is the impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch.106, Art. II], as amended? 18. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to this rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protecti on of the public health, safety, and welfare? RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant’s request to amend Ordinance 97-3 in order to add motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC Code 4225, air-conditioned and mini-and self-storage warehousing only) as a permitted use and to increase the maximum building height from 28 feet to 38 feet for that use only. Prepared by: Gil Martinez, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Final Staff Report (PDF) 2. Ordinance 030119(2) (PDF) 3. FLUE Consistency Memo R1 (Apr 23 2018) (PDF) 4. [Linked] Application support materials (PDF) 5. Legal Ad - Agenda ID 8230 (PDF) 17.B Packet Pg. 1213 04/09/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.B Doc ID: 8230 Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve An Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 97-3, which rezoned the subject property to a Heavy Commercial (C-5) zoning district with conditions, in order to add motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC code 4225, air-conditioned and mini-and self storage only) as a permitted use, and to increase the maximum building height for that use only, from the presently allowed maximum height of 28 feet to a zoned height of 35 feet and an actual height of 38 feet. The subject property is located on the north side of U.S. 41 East, approximately 1,000 feet east of Collier Boulevard, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2.17± acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20180000125] Meeting Date: 04/09/2019 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Gilbert Martinez 03/04/2019 4:20 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 03/04/2019 4:20 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Completed 03/06/2019 2:32 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Additional Reviewer Completed 03/07/2019 9:03 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 03/08/2019 4:02 PM Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 03/11/2019 9:20 AM Growth Management Department James C French Deputy Department Head Review Completed 03/14/2019 7:18 PM County Attorney's Office Scott Stone Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 03/20/2019 2:08 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 03/20/2019 3:13 PM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 03/25/2019 3:38 PM Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 04/01/2019 11:17 AM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 04/02/2019 9:09 AM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 04/09/2019 9:00 AM 17.B Packet Pg. 1214 REZONE PL20180000125 - STORALL Page 1 of 12 February 21, 2019 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2019 SUBJECT: PETITION NO: PL20180000125 – STORALL REZONE ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT & AGENT: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Rook at Naples II, LLC Felix Pardo 4828 Ashford Dunwoody Rd. Felix Pardo and Associates, Inc. Atlanta, GA 30338 2100 Salzedo St. Coral Gables, FL 33134 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to amend Ordinance No. 97-3, which rezoned the subject property to a Heavy Commercial (C-5) zoning district with conditions, in order to add motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC Code 4225, air-conditioned and mini-and self-storage warehousing only) as a permitted use, and to increase the maximum building height from 28 feet to 35 feet for that use only. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side of U.S. 41 East, approximately 1,000 feet east of Collier Boulevard, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See Location Map on Following Page) 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 1215 Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) REZONE PL20180000125 - STORALL Page 2 of 12 February 21, 2019 17.B.1Packet Pg. 1216Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) REZONE PL20180000125 - STORALL Page 3 of 12 February 21, 2019 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: In 1997, by way of Ordinance # 97-3, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners changed the zoning classification of the subject property from Agricultural “A” to Heavy Commercial “C- 5” with certain conditions including precluding but three C-5 permitted uses. At this juncture, the applicant is requesting a rezoning of C-5 to C-5 in order to amend Ordinance 97-3 to add a conditional use. The requested rezoning would be a mechanism to amend Ordinance# 97-3 and facilitate the development of approximately 95,300 square foot, three-story, air-conditioned self- storage facility on the 2.28-acre property. It is important to note that the requested amendment to Ordinance 97-3 only applies to the portion of the Legal Description depicted as Subject Site in Exhibit B, Sheet 1 of 2: Area of Rezone and further defined by the Legal Description provided in Exhibit B, 2 of 2 of the amended ordinance. Intentionally Blank 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 1217 Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) REZONE PL20180000125 - STORALL Page 4 of 12 February 21, 2019 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the subject parcels: North: Falling Waters Beach Resort; Planned Unit Development (PUD) East: Tractor Supply Company; C-5 South: Tamiami Crossing; Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) West: Vacant Land; Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) Aerial (County GIS) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed amendment. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any amendment petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. SUBJECT SITE 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 1218 Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) REZONE PL20180000125 - STORALL Page 5 of 12 February 21, 2019 Future Land Use (FLUE): Staff identified the FLUE policies relevant to this project and determined that the proposed amendment to the PUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Please, see Attachment B – FLUE Consistency Review for a more detailed analysis of how staff derived this determination. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2015 and 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” The proposed Rezone on the subject property was reviewed based on the then applicable 2017 AUIR Inventory Report. The TIS submitted in the application indicates that the proposed Self- Storage Mini-Warehouse use will generate approximately 16 PM peak hour two-way trip, which represents a reduction in the number of potential PM peak hour two-way trips compared to the currently permitted uses as noted in the TIS. Based on the 2017 and 2018 AUIR the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed rezone within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject petition can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 1219 Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) REZONE PL20180000125 - STORALL Page 6 of 12 February 21, 2019 Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental staff has evaluated the petition. No revisions to the environmental conditions of the existing ordinance are being made. The proposal is consistent with the CCME. GMP Conclusion: Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and has reviewed the criteria on which a determination must be based. These criteria are specifically noted in Section 10.02.08.F of the LDC. The staff evaluation establishes a factual basis to support the recommendations of staff. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for the recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. These evaluations are completed as part of the Zoning and Land Development Review provided below. Environmental Review: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The recorded Conservation Easement (OR 3989 PG 591-596) will not be impacted by the proposed petition. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Landscape Review: The buffer labels shown on the concept plan are consistent with LDC requirements. Transportation Review: The subject petition can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Utilities Review: There is adequate capacity to accommodate the requested rezone. REZONING ANALYSIS LDC SECTION 10.02.08F 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 1220 Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) REZONE PL20180000125 - STORALL Page 7 of 12 February 21, 2019 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning portion of this staff report. Given the fact the property is currently zoned C-5, and the nature of the petition is to increase the height to 35 feet only for this use, which is the permitted building height in said zoning district and to introduce motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC 4225, mini and self-storage warehousing only). The land use pattern would be consistent with abutting commercial properties along Tamiami Trail. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The requested rezoning will not create an isolated zoning district as it currently zoned C-5. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The boundary of the C-5 zoning district would mirror the boundary of the rectangular- shaped subject parcel. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed rezone is necessary in order to afford the applicant the ability to introduce Motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC 4225, mini and self-storage warehousing only), a use which is permitted in C-5 zoning districts. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. At the November 28, 2018 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), residents, primarily from the Falling Waters PUD, commented and inquired about the following issues: ➢ Maintenance of Perimeter Landscape Buffers, Perimeter Wall and Stormwater: The agent Felix Pardo and Associates and their Engineer, Chris Mitchell of Evans Engineering, addressed these concerns explaining that the subject property is included in a unified Site Development Plan (SDP) which includes multiple parcels and a comprehensive landscape and stormwater plan. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the proposed Storall development, stormwater management areas, and landscape buffers must be in place. Maintenance of the landscaping is the collective responsibility of the owners of these SDP parcels. Other questions were raised regarding stormwater management and drainage. Mr. Mitchell stated that water management areas are depicted on the Master Plan and must meet all Collier County and South Florida Water Management District requirements. Water will not drain toward the Falling Waters community, instead draining to US 41 through an outfall on the west side of the development. 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 1221 Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) REZONE PL20180000125 - STORALL Page 8 of 12 February 21, 2019 ➢ Design: Questions were raised regarding the height of the proposed building, the size of the units, and the colors of the building. The proposed building is setback 137 feet from the rear (north) property line adjacent to Falling Waters. This is more than twice the 60-foot setback required by Ordinance 97-3. The office and loading areas have been set back even further from Falling Waters and are orientated so that they are not visible from the rear. Units are accessed from inside the building and will vary in size. As this is household storage only, most of the units are expected to be less than 150 square feet. There will be no elevated lighting installed adjacent to Falling Water as this area will be solely be utilized for stormwater management, with no access or vehicular use areas. Mr. Pardo explained that the color palette used in the rendering on display is expected to be that utilized on the final design. Additional concern was raised regarding the building height. The agents Collier County representative, Robert Mulhere explained that the increase is minimal and needed to accommodate three stories. The roof deck is flat, so there will be no gables or slopes that will be visible to Falling Waters. A line of sight exhibit looking to the south was requested. The applicant Felix Pardo agreed to provide this, as viewed from the second floor of units in Falling Waters closest to the subject site, and comparing what is permitted now, a 28-foot-tall building with a 60-foot setback, to what is proposed, which is a +/- 33-foot-tall building with a 137-foot setback. ➢ Staffing and Vehicular Access: Due to the nature of household storage and the size of the units, there will most likely be a maximum of two employees. Large moving trucks are not expected, again due to the small size of the units. In any case, the vehicular activity is limited to the front and front half of the west side of the parcel. As proposed, the rezoning is not expected to have an adverse negative influence on the residents of the Falling Waters PUD. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project at this time. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. Staff does not anticipate any stormwater related issues resulting from the approval of the requested rezoning of the site. The site recently obtained a SFWMD application/permit 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 1222 Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) REZONE PL20180000125 - STORALL Page 9 of 12 February 21, 2019 (180828-14 11-03155-P) approval for the proposed development, and County staff will evaluate the site’s stormwater system at time of review of any site development permits. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. As proposed a change in height from 28 feet to 35 feet and introduction of Motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, mini and self-storage warehousing only) will not significantly reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Staff does not anticipate the rezoning would be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed rezone, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. Yes. As per Ordinance #97-3, Motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC 4225, mini- and self-storage warehousing only) are not a permitted use on the subject property, hence the need for amending said Ordinance by way of a Rezone to C-5. 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 1223 Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) REZONE PL20180000125 - STORALL Page 10 of 12 February 21, 2019 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff’s position that the proposed rezoning to C-5, increase of height and introduction of the requested use is not out of scale with the needs of the community or the County along that portion of U.S. 41 / Tamiami Trail. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any future development anticipated by the rezoning would require an extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on November 28, 2019 at Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Auditorium 300 Tower Road, Naples, FL, 34113. The NIM commenced promptly at 5:30 p.m. and ended at 6:50 p.m. There were approximately 70 people in attendance. At the NIM members of the Falling Waters PUD requested the applicant look into establishing a landscape and perimeter wall maintenance agreement with the adjacent property owner. The applicant made a commitment to look into it the matter and report back to the Falling Water Community at Home Owners Association meeting scheduled for February 8, 2018. 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 1224 Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) REZONE PL20180000125 - STORALL Page 11 of 12 February 21, 2019 COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on February 1, 2019. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: 1) Proposed Ordinance 2) Application & Support Material 3) FLUE Consistency Review 4) Legal Notifications 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 1225 Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) 12 12 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 1226 Attachment: Final Staff Report (8230 : Storall Rezone) 17.B.2 Packet Pg. 1227 Attachment: Ordinance 030119(2) (8230 : Storall Rezone) 17.B.2 Packet Pg. 1228 Attachment: Ordinance 030119(2) (8230 : Storall Rezone) 17.B.2 Packet Pg. 1229 Attachment: Ordinance 030119(2) (8230 : Storall Rezone) 17.B.2 Packet Pg. 1230 Attachment: Ordinance 030119(2) (8230 : Storall Rezone) 17.B.2Packet Pg. 1231Attachment: Ordinance 030119(2) (8230 : Storall Rezone) 17.B.2 Packet Pg. 1232 Attachment: Ordinance 030119(2) (8230 : Storall Rezone) 17.B.2Packet Pg. 1233Attachment: Ordinance 030119(2) (8230 : Storall Rezone) 17.B.2Packet Pg. 1234Attachment: Ordinance 030119(2) (8230 : Storall Rezone) Zoning Division · 2800 North Horseshoe Drive · Naples, FL 34104 · 239-252-2400 Page 1 of 2 Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: Tim Finn, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, and David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division Date: April 23, 2018 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: Rezone (RZ)) - PL20180000125 - REV 1 PETITION NAME: StorAll Building REQUEST: Rezone the subject parcel from C-5 Zoning District with a 28-foot height restriction to a C-5 Zoning District without restrictions (according to the rezone application form, page 2 of 8). The petition identifies self- storage, which is allowed in C-5, as the intended use. This site was previously approved by Ordinance #97-3. LOCATION: The ±2.28-acre site is on the north side of Tamiami East Trail (US41), approximately ¼ mile southeast of Collier Blvd. (CR951), in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center #18, as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. The Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to provide for concentrated commercial and mixed use development but with carefully configured access to the road network. The full array of commercial uses are allowed (C-1 through C-5), subject to consideration of various “factors to be considered.” Given the existing zoning of the site, and the limited amount of C-5 zoning in this Activity Center, or proximate to it, (only the subject site and adjacent parcel), staff does not think it necessary to provide an evaluation of the factors in the FLUE. The Mixed-Use Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate almost all new commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create focal points within the community. Mixed-Use Activity Centers are intended to be mixed-use in character. Further, they are generally intended to be developed at a human -scale, to be pedestrian- oriented, and to be interconnected with abutting projects – whether commercial or residential. Street, pedestrian pathway and bike lane interconnections with abutting properties, where possible and practicable, are encouraged. The site is zoned C-5 with several restrictions, imposed by Ord. #97-3. This request is to rezone the site to C-5 without restrictions; the stated intended use is self-storage, though if the rezone is approved, any C-5 use would be permitted. The desired use is consistent with the Mixed-Use Activity Center. In reviewing for compliance with Policy 5.6 (shown in italics below) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) staff provides the following analysis in [bracketed bold text.] 17.B.3 Packet Pg. 1235 Attachment: FLUE Consistency Memo R1 (Apr 23 2018) (8230 : Storall Rezone) Zoning Division · 2800 North Horseshoe Drive · Naples, FL 34104 · 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 2 FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety.] In reviewing for compliance with FLUE Objective 7 and related Policies (shown in italics), staff provides the following analysis in [bracketed bold text]. FLUE Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [‘Site Plans’ multi-page document in the petition packet, depicts frontage on Tamiami Trail East (US41), a principal arterial (urban and rural) and access to US41 that is located at the southwest corner of the subject site that appears to also be the southeast corner of the adjoining parcel (also owned by same owner – Rook at Naples). FLUE Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [‘Site Plans’ does not show proposed road looping around entire site. However, given the size of the site this may not be feasible. All development on the site will be served by a single access point on US41.] FLUE Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [‘Site Plans’ indicates a vehicular interconnection point with the adjoining vacant parcel zoned C-3 to the west and an interconnection to the parcel zoned C-5 to the east (owned by CPI Naples). A sidewalk is shown that interconnects with the parcel to the east. No additional interconnection is shown on the ‘Site Plans’ to the north to the fully built-out residential multi-family dwelling units, Falling Waters Beach Resort Planned Unit Development (nor would this interconnection be feasible).] FLUE Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [There is an existing sidewalk on Tamiami Trail East (US41). The proposed commercial development is for self-storage warehousing (though any C-5 use will be permitted if this rezone is approved). According to ‘Site Plans’ in the petition packet, sidewalks will be provided by the parking and also as interconnecting with the parcel to the east. As no deviation is requested, sidewalks must be provided as required by the Land Development Code.] REVIEW of REZONE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS Note: 1. Cover letter states that the project was exempt from FLUE Policy 5.6 because of location. This isn’t true and should be corrected. CONCLUSION Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition consistent with Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. Minor revisions to the application documents are requested, as noted above under “Review of PUD Document.” Petition on CityView cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks, Manager, AICP, Growth Management Plan, Zoning Division Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division RZ-PL20180000125 StorAll.docx 17.B.3 Packet Pg. 1236 Attachment: FLUE Consistency Memo R1 (Apr 23 2018) (8230 : Storall Rezone) 17.B.5 Packet Pg. 1237 Attachment: Legal Ad - Agenda ID 8230 (8230 : Storall Rezone) Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STANDARD REZONE APPLICATION LDC Section 10.02.08 Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Rook at Naples 11, LLC Address: 4828 Ashford Dunwoody Rd. city. Atlanta Telephone: (678) 722-8699 Cell: E -Mail Address:lesse@crownhgroup.com Name of Applicant/Agent: Felix Pardo Firm: Felix Pardo and Associates, Inc Address: 2100 Salzedo St, Telephone: (305) 445-4555 State: GA Fax: City: Coral Gables State ZIP: 30338 FI ZIP: 33134 Cell: (305) 778-7234 Fax: (305) 445-7006 E -Mail Address: Fpardo@FPAdesign.com PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application, if space is inadequate, attach on separate page: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 3 /51 26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Metes & Bounds Description: Property I.D. Number: 00726727007 09/28/217 Page 1 of 8 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www,collieraov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Size of Property: 219.61 ft.X 400 ft = 99,633.70 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 2.28 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: On Tamiami Trail E, aprox. 1,250 ft southeast from Collier Blvd. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Section/Township/Range: 51 /26 Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00726040001 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: C-5 Zoning district(s) to the C-5 w/o restrictions zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Vacant Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the subject property: Self Storage Facility Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. 09/28/217 Page 2 of 8 Zoning Land Use N PUD Multifamily S CPUD Commercial E C-5 Commercial W C-3 Vacant If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Section/Township/Range: 51 /26 Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00726040001 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: C-5 Zoning district(s) to the C-5 w/o restrictions zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Vacant Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the subject property: Self Storage Facility Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. 09/28/217 Page 2 of 8 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierxov.net Cu er County ASSOCIATIONS 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Requirement: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colIiergov.net/]ndex.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Falling Waters Beach Resort Master Homeowners Associatio Mailing Address: 4851 Tamiami Trail N City: Naples State: FI Zip: 34103 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC section 10.02.08, staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, please provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future land use map and elements of the Growth Management Plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment (rezone) when necessary. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. 09/28/217 Page 3 of 8 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collier,gov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whetherthe proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch. 106, art. II], as amended]. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No if so please provide copies. 09/28/217 Page 4 of 8 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net CAT County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR STANDARD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(.): Felix Pardo and Associates,lnc. Address: 2100 Salzedo St. City: Coral Gables State: FI ZIP: 33134 Telephone: (305)445-4555 Cell: (305) 778-7234 Fax: (305) 445-7006 E -Mail Address: Fpardo@FPAdesign.com Address of Subject Property (If available): City: State: Florida ZIP: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: 3 /51 / 26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Metes & Bounds Description: Property I.D. Number: 00726727007 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): e. Septic Svstem I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: B. Sewer -Peak: Average Daily:. Average Daily: 09/28/217 Page 5 of 8 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coiliergov.net Ca er County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: TBD Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. There is sewer available within the south side of the property. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the vroiect shall be urovided. I PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS ( This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 09/28/217 Page 6 of 8 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Ca er County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Standard Rezone Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Pre -Application meeting notes 1 Project Narrative 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Utility Provisions Statement with sketches 1 Signed and Sealed Survey 1 Conceptual Site Plan 1 Architectural Rendering El List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 1 Warranty Deeds 1 Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Li Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys 1 ❑ ❑ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. Historical Survey or waiver request ❑ ❑ 1 _ Traffic Impact Statement, with applicable fees 1 School Impact Analysis Application — residential projects only1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." 09/28/217 Page 7 of 8 C� er Car��.ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following additional reviewers: FEE REQUIREMENTS ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre -application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre -application meeting will be required) ❑ Rezone Petition (regular): $6,000.00 plus $25.00 an acre (or fraction thereof) o Additional Fee for 5th and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee ❑ Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $750.00 ❑ Listed/Protected Species Survey: $1,000.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising: o CCPC- $1,125.00 o BCC- $500.00 ❑ Transportation Fee: o Methodology Review: $500.00 (Additional fees to be determined at Methodology meeting) ❑ School Concurrency Review: If required, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time o f application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/O►Avner Signature '•• im'o kpplicant/Ov rfWe ease print) 09/28/217 Date Page 8 of 8 Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Historical Review City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams and David Berra ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ I Other: Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre -application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre -application meeting will be required) ❑ Rezone Petition (regular): $6,000.00 plus $25.00 an acre (or fraction thereof) o Additional Fee for 5th and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee ❑ Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $750.00 ❑ Listed/Protected Species Survey: $1,000.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising: o CCPC- $1,125.00 o BCC- $500.00 ❑ Transportation Fee: o Methodology Review: $500.00 (Additional fees to be determined at Methodology meeting) ❑ School Concurrency Review: If required, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time o f application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/O►Avner Signature '•• im'o kpplicant/Ov rfWe ease print) 09/28/217 Date Page 8 of 8 Felix Pardo & Associates, Inc. Architecture Planning Interiors 2100 Salzedo Street, Suite 303 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 AA0002478 6 March 2018 Amended 26 July 2018 Amended 10 August 2018 Collier County Growth Management Department Development Review Division 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 Re Proposed Retail StorAll Building Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida PL# 2018000125 FPA Project Number: 201703 To whom it may concern; On behalf of my client, please accept this letter describing our intent to develop this parcel into a three story, approximately 95,300 square foot self -storage building. The site was rezoned C-5 through a public hearing as Ordinance No. 97-3 in 1997 with a 28 foot height restriction. We are requesting that the parcel height restriction be removed and allow the C-5 zoning restriction to a maximum height of 35 feet. The current design presently indicates less than 35 feet. Furthermore, we are also requesting that the specific use of self -storage which is allowed in C-5 be specifically granted for this parcel. We are maintaining the original conditions of Ordinance No. 97-3 with the exception of Condition 4 with reference to the height limitation. We are also requesting that the Condition 5 have the words "be insulated to" be removed since we do not have windows on the north side of the project and the building will not required sound insulation because of the type of construction which already "inhibit noise emissions to said property". We are also requesting the self -storage use to be included in Condition 1 which refers to allowable uses. We believe that this self -storage building use which complies with the new Collier County Land Development Code Chapter 5 Supplemental Standards will also have less of a negative impact in terms of noise and parking/traffic impact than some of the uses presently permitted on this site. Finally, we are also consistant with the growth management plan. The project also complies with Policy 7.1 through 7.4 of the Growth Management Plan Consistency & Evaluation Criteria Analysis. The project is exempt from Policy 5.6 because of location. Sincerely, Fe[iJPardQ, AIA, ASEACSI COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergoV.net C0 er County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the Dercentaee of such interest: b. C. Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: I Name and Address I % of Ownership I If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentaize of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 �."County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coliiergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Rook at Naples II, LLC 100% 4828 Ashford Dunwoody Road, Suite 400 Atlanta, GA 30338 ' Managers: Blair G. Schlossberg & Moshe Manoah e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the Vicers, stocKnoiaers, Denericianes, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Stor-All Acquisitions, LLC 1375 West Hillsboro Boulevard Deerfield Beach, FL 33442 Date of Contract: 10/03/2017 f. If anv contineencv clause or contract terms involve additional Darties. list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Co er Gaunty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.no Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: 11 /19/2018 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 . or AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change In ownership whether Individually or with a Trustee, Company or other Interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature De Agent/Owner Name (pleaseprint) of 20o I� ct t 1 ,LLMC LOtorte�) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 INSTR 5047190 OR 5090 PG 2453 RECORDED 10/31/2014 2:25 PM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $5,475.00 REC $18.50 CONS $925,000.00 Prepared By and Return to: Mary Sue Beeler, Esq. 13716 Marseilles Court Clearwater, Fl- 33762 Consideration: $ 925,000.00 Parcels 00726727007, 00725960001, 00726040001 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED is made as of the z�g"aday of October 2014, between MUTUAL OF OMAHA BANK ("Grantor"), whose address is 302 N. Dale Mabry Highway, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33609, and ROOK AT NAPLES 11, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is 4828 Ashford Dunwoody Road, Suite 400, Atlanta, GA 30338. WITNESSETH, that Grantor rvgl d:ns'�d A n1of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), and other good and valuable conside ' -Grantor in h pfd y Grantee, the receipt of which Is acknowledged, conveys to G n a Grantee's success o a assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying d irfaln-C1AlerL ur ty,, Flo a: SEE EXHIBIT" Me�E R IMIM- 1= PART HEREOF together with all rights, bensij4dl��tYe rants t $This conveyance is to real estate tax for th r 2014 and subsequent years and restrictions, easements aIers of record, And Grantor covenan"re- that above noted, at the time of the delivery of this deed, the premises fi°�` rances made by Grantor, and that Grantor will warrant and defend against t-t.T c ims and demands of all persons claiming by, through, or under Grantor, but against none other. Signed, Sealed and Delivered In the' Presence olt Pr"inte Name: SANDRA H. VANF{UKN Pfint d Name: GRANTOR: MUTUAL OF OM BA iC By. John Stat 1P11sldent STATE OF FLO A ' COUNTYOFe.� _ The €oregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this c7�7 day of October, 2014, by John Clark, as State President of Mutual of Omaha Bank, on behalf of said institution, He [check one] ( 1--ris personally known to me or ( } has produced as Identification. Signature: rLr1C�'s�-tom SAHDRAH. VAN HDRN Printed Name: f SANDRA H. VAN HMM- fe4i .' �. Carcnts5lon Efi 1285f5 Fxplres Oda6er 36, 2Dt5 W W6 i!w Try FiR r+Rtirae p67ki�614 *** OR 5090 PG 2454 *** EXHIBIT "A" Being a parcel of land lying In the North 1/2 of section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows; COMMENCE at the southwesterly most corner of those certain lands described as "Parcel 4" and recorded in Official Records Book 4380, Page 3511 of the public records of Collier County, Florida, the same being the southwesterly most corner of those certain lands described as "Parcel 117FEE" and recorded In Official Records Book 4901, Page 28 of said public records; thence North 35°34'22" East, along the northwesterly line of last of said lands, a distance of 10.00 feet to northwesterly most corner of said "Parcel 117Fee" and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land herein described; thence continue North 35"34'22" East, along the boundary of said "Parcel 4", a distance of 390.00 feet to the most northwesterly corner of said "Parcel 4"; thence South 54'25'38" East, along the northeasterly boundaries of "Parcel 4", "Parcel 3" and 'Ph as .2.RemaInder", all of said Official Records Book 4380, Page 3511, a distance of 896.00 feet to n g1601h y corner of said "Phase 2 Remainder"; thence South 35'34'22" West, alonter y said "Phase 2 Remainder", a distance of 400.00 feet to the southeaster rjq corner of said "Phase Inder"; thence North 54'25'38" West, along the southwesterly b un es -of sad "Phase 2 Rema de 'and said "Parcel 3", a distance of 524,21 feet to the southeaster m st c rffNf t e ce 'n land es ibed as "Parcel 118FEE" and recorded in said Official Recor s B a�@1 u i cor s; thence North 35'35'42" East, along the southeasterly boun Mf Ido a ce 1 sce of i .00 feet to the most northeasterly corner of said " ?r5 1 "; e N rth 54 2 38' t, along the northeasterly boundaries of said "Parcel 11 f an "Parcce117F dis ce .79 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Together with all of Owner's right, tlu interest In and t ain Reciprocal Easement Agreement dated July 3, 2008 and re',200 ok 4376, Page 402, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. i l cl )l CONSENT ACTION OF ROOK AT NAPLES 11, LLC TAKEN BY UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT OF ALL MANAGERS IN LIEU OF MEETING Effective the IsAday of September, 2015, the undersigned, being all of the Managers of Rook at Naples 11, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the "Company") pursuant to the Company's Operating Agreement and pursuant to the Florida Limited Liability Act, do hereby (i) consent to the adoption of the following resolutions, which action shall have the same force and effect as if adopted by unanimous affirmative vote at a special meeting of the Company, (ii) waive all requirements of notice, and (iii) direct that this consent be fled with the minutes of the proceedings of the Company: . WHEREAS, the Company desires to commence the site development of that certain property comprised of approximately 8.142 acres and identified as being Phase 11 Home Center Plaza, and being more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"); WHEREAS, Blair G. Schlossberg and Moshe Manoah are the Managers of the Company; WHEREAS, the Company has retained the services of EMK Consultants of Florida, Inc. to complete the civil and engineering plans and to obtain and secure all required subdivision, construction, and plan approval pen -nits pursuant to that certain Proposal of Site Engineering Services dated June 1, 2015 between the Company and EMK; WHEREAS, the Company has retained the services of Johnson Engineering, Inc. to complete a listed species survey, which is required by Collier County, Florida, pursuant to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated September 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Company will retain the design -build services of KTM Builders LLC and will enter into an agreement for said services which will be mutually agreed upon between the parties. WHEREAS, the Managers have determined that the best interests of the Company will be served by the appointment of an Officer (the "Officer") for the purpose of executing documents necessary for the Company's subdivision, development, permitting and construction of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Emilia Pearson is hereby elected as a Vice President of the Company for the purpose of completing certain acts on behalf of the Company related to the subdivision, permitting and development of the Property; FURTHER RESOLVED, notwithstanding any restrictions contained in the Operating Agreement of the Company, that Emilia Pearson, in her capacity as Vice President, may execute any and all documents on behalf of the Company, including but not limited to, permit applications, affidavits, contracts, contract amendments, and any other documents necessary to effectuate the Company's subdivision, permitting and development of the Property; FURTHER RESOLVED, that any actions of the Members, Managers, Jesse O. Kaba and Emilia Pearson, which would have been authorized by these preambles and resolutions except that such acts were taken prior to the adoption of such preambles and resolutions, including, without limitation, the negotiation, documentation, and execution of the aforementioned Proposal of Site Engineering Services and Professional Services Agreement, are hereby ratified, confirmed, approved and adopted as the actions of the Company; and FURTHER RESOLVED, this action may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, of which together shall constitute one in the same instrument. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) (SIGNATURE PAGE TO CONSENT ACTION OF ROOK AT NAPLES I1, LLC TAKEN BY UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT OF ALL MANAGERS IN LIEU OF MEETING) below. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Consent as of the day(s) set forth MANAGERS: Blair G. Schlossberg'., ---- Date: C2Rj 6 2015 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Being a parcel of land lying in the North 112 of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the southwesterly most corner of those certain lands described as "Parcel 4" and recorded in Official Records Book 4380, Page 3511 of the public records of Collier County, Florida, the same being the southwesterly most corner of those certain lands described as "Parcel 117FEE" and recorded in Official. Records Book4901, rage 28. of said public records; thence North 35°34'22" East, along the northwesterly line of last of said lands, a distance of 10.00 feet to northwesterly most corner of said "Parcel 117Fee" and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land herein described; thence continue North 35°34'22" East, along the boundary of said "Parcel 4", a distance of 390.00 feet to the most northwesterly corner of said "Parcel 4"; thence South 54°25'38" East, along the northeasterly boundaries of "Parcel 4", "Parcel 3" and "Phase 2 Remainder", all of said Official Records Book 438Q Page 3511., a distance of 896.00 feet to the most northeasterly corner of said "Phase 2 Remainder"; thence South 35°34'22" West, along the southeasterly boundary of said "Phase 2 Remainder", a distance of 400.00 feet to the southeasterly most corner of said "Phase 2 Remainder"; thence North 54°25'38" West, along the southwesterly boundaries of said "Phase 2 Remainder" and said "Parcel 3", a distance of 524.21 feet to the southeasterly most corner of those certain lands described as "Parcel 1 18FEE" and recorded in said Official Records Book 49�Page 28 of said public records; thence North 35°35'42" East, along the southeasterly boundary of said "Parcel 118FEE", a distance of 10.00 feet to the most northeasterly comer of said "Parcel 118FEE"; thence North 54°25'38" West, along the northeasterly boundaries of said "Parcel 118FEE" and "Parcel 117FEE", a distance of 371.79 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Together with all of Owner's right, title and interest in and to that certain Reciprocal Easement Agreement dated July 3, 2008 and recorded July 7, 2008 in O.R. Book 43761 Page 402, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. and Together with those certain perpetual easements for access, drainage and utilities pursuant to that certain Declaration for Covenants, Restrictions, and Easements for Home Center Plaza, as recorded in O.R. , Page of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) I, MMU06r"10t (print name), as Menyr (title, If applicable) of swmlAegmemo-, u.c — (company, If a llcable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicanl[cgntraat purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to Impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions In this appllcatkm and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of Investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. ti. Well authorize ralV PardD andAmadnIna to act as our/my representative In any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. `Notes, • If the applicant Is a corporation, then It Is usually executed by the corp. pros. or v. pros. • It the applicant Is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should lyplcally be slgned by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant Is a partnership, then typlcally a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. . If the applicant Is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be ldentiflod as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each Instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., Individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorizatlon and that the facts stated in It are true. 21271111 Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on Q (date) by (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who Is personaally� n to me or who has produced (type of Identification) as Identification. 61grivu6D of otary lic STAMPISEAL a 6"BM OLASSEY MY C01+1MI951ON I FF O"11 { • fir` EXPIRES: April 20, 2018 0pndedihmNoleryPumU.I..dGro CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/24/14 FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) 1 En*8 PGAtn" AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION PL20180000125 (print name), asy--Prodder! (title. If apptirable) of Rook al Napa u. me (company, if a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner©applicant contract purchaserand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize -Fou Pwdoanss-wes,lne. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pros. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant Is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each Instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., Individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that no facts a ted In true. "r d5 - o f� Signature 0 Onto STATE OF F*GR+DA G Ol2t a t s, COUNTY OF 6€aWE-R 'I'he foregoing Iltstrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on W41.0 4 . 2010ate) by I U^- (name of parson providing oatli or affirmation), as y i (,t_ fag i dAn4 who is personalty known i or who has produced (type of Identifica�iani ps identification, STAlM1A19F�42•(syPNNTr ee„ `�/++., r ¢ t3 [g u f ota ubll +_ C)• v N.• L7s ,z. _ sy �' exp ,••O �: C1'1{#B•CUA-ob1 119 'f N �.•,• REV 3/24/14 req+uuu<<y..�' jm';� al - --------- ----- 3sSTORV BUILDING 711 I 11P M wrr 111 li I j - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 'Mo— fiql4f0l ---_6RAHL 10. RMAWAY-41 SOUTH----- - CONC CURB - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STATE ROAD - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - AM' - - - - - - LINE OF STATE ROAD MOO (D) PULS MM[WN ---------------------- SITE PLAN ----------- ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- I ------------------- Lu (L (L -z SP -1 .+f N ilf � w ff"�-aR kiuirS.��n�rlliSl■mnnsr -------------w.T—��� --- -----• -- ---•� s -------- _---------- - Fly ---------------------- CONCEPTUAL .-- ---------- CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN I I eb 9 tl i 3 /r r IL ------------ r. On h i ❑ ❑1-7 11 ❑ C El y +� GROUND FLOOR PLAN %D Z C) J m J J Q A-1 $Ec,2FLOOR PLAN & THIRD FLOOR PD & S011TH EAST ELEVATION .0 W.�. NORTHEAST ELEVATION w O N W Q . ZpP QO 111 NL LL d) 0- w O� IL - - - - - — - _ ------------ SOUTHWEST -------- -SOUTHWEST ELEVATION " r - l­-9;4 NORTHWEST ELEVATION A-5 s 542- ld' 1 1 / O IL I'D 4 I LOT 3 Fes, LOT 2 l."01 -A-1 CRES I 1.90 ACRES 2.20 ACRES ,I wm — — W r W Av. THA r yL.s. `" fi AAAA. mvrWW C° 1e n Zk '. hw vrWeue. I� W. t 1 L ! rc INSTALL W= CWPXIC SGLL£ LOT 1 1.92 ACRES 3 SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST ` COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA a 1REFER TO ARCH /MECH OWLS FOR ELECTRICAL GLS AND TELEPHONE SERICES n 2 PN O TO COWSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR IS TO OBTAIN THE LATEST EOTON OF "COLLIER COLI k� 1, _ IITNTIESS STANDARDS NNUAL CONSTRMIOHCTMATERALS ANO WORK -11 ARE TO CONFORM ! 171 E LATEST CDUNn STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS " S ] CONTRACTOR IS TO VERFY SIZE, NATERNL AND CONNECTION POINTS OF Ek WRIER AND SEWER FORCE MAINS PRIOR 10 CONSTRUCTION OF THE DOMESTIC WATER AND SANNARY SEWER SYSTEMS A 71t CONTRAttOA/EUGIxEER OF RECORD MUST' CONTACT COWER C 1 GROWTH NAWEMEU E CULINEERINO SERWCES TO SET UP THE PRE CONSTRUCTION INETINC REFERENCE5 ALL THE WORTH AMERICAN YENTICAL OATUI OF 1986 M 0 (Ww BB). - 5 COR CTOR EXPOSE WATER WAIN AND FURNISH TAPPING SLEEK AND — FOR WATER IETER TAP A ]" POLYET—ENE (P.E) WATER SERVICE LINE FROM NAIN TO METER d T CONTRACTORTO COORDINATE WITH COW[R COUNTY WBUC UTILMES DEPT PRIOR TO THE 'O BEEMBOAAND ORDERINGD/OR OF THE WATER METER ANSACkRWI PREKNRN DEVICE ASSIES'u • - - ALL NON-METALLIC PIPE WILL BE INSTALLED WITH Z PA TO GAUGE. COPPER TRACER WIC[ 0 _ ._ BO SUITABLE COUPLINGS COMPL-I WITH ASTM SPECIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR JOIUINC M ' =X u ASSILEAR NATCRMLS W 11 ALL LNAITE DDIEEC WITER PIPING SHALL BE SCHEDULE AO PVC, OR HOPE SDR -09 W ' 2 ILL R ISN TO BE SDR -26 ASTM C -CODA AND - 212 _ t] Ll IDN PER CTRAi10N DOE' HOT ETCEED 50 FALLONS PER INCH OF PIPE 0 - AMNLTER MILE PE MY OR ION OF HE SYSTEM y »p2 E%FILTRATION OR INFRTPATION TESTS SHALL BEOF I FEET PERFORMED WITH A IININOu PoSITWE HEAD y e B AIR TESTS AS A INTITI1C SHILL CONFORM TO THE TEST PPOCEDF-1117 RE DESCRIBED IN ASTM E N C-626 FOR PE TN C 921 OR CONCRETE PIPE ASTM - A R FOR { rwwl• w• tW� ANPoD APPROPRMTE TF ROCEDUR[5 FOR OTHER NATERIALSN T PP M . A ALL P POSED PIPES SMALL pBE SUITIBLY-IOEHIIFLABLE AS T'0 TENDED USE PER LOCAL CODES: Cn POTABLE/SANITARY/RECLAIMED STALLED W - 1„ -1 t5 METERS 2' OR SMILER WILL BE IN COLLIER COUNTY C 9.. 6 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SERVICE LEAD AND METER BOA 7 _ - E ER ufTER TO BE SI BY COWER DO— PUBLIC UTILITIESE.i CRLREOUIRED IWSPECTIONS REWIRE A 45 HOUR NOTICE OWN H -110S C OWNS AND WILL NINTAIN POTABLE WATER IRRICATION WATER. AND SYST WASTEWATER EMS D • .fit 2 ALL COSTS AND E2PENSES OF - AND ALL REPAIRS, REPLACEMENTS, WINTENINCE AND _ _ II' OSES W RESTORATIONS OF ABOVECROUND IMPRDNEIAENTS PERNNIED WITHIN A COWER CO 11 _ 2 DA REIEN SHEL BE THE SOLC nNANCML RESPONSIBUITY OF THE GRAMOR, rts SUCCESSORS OR h_ GENEMI xDTEz: • • - 8 ACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH [OWER COUNTY AND THE EOR FOR �- 1t °Wl J RFr2y R,• . ALL E.IlTN OF IUSPECPONS DURIuc CONSTRUCTION h f Fr! 2 AR�ExESDiIxC UTE rtIESR SHOWN ON PUNS ARE flASfD ON THE BEST AVA�UBEq IxFOHRwi10N >EY=S(a P 0 To x EDSTIN IME OF PERUTlt II CONTRACTOR S LL FIE v IFY E •'•�Y � - :•]! •.- — OCATION OF ALl IX UTILITIES PRIOR 0 CONSTPUCIION iif J CLEAN-OIRS SHALL WVFGTHE TETTERS YAMTIAY' DR'EAH' INSCRIBED •�b� .I` •.r: DO Ag B BASIS OF BEARING LP - PRRNANEWT CONTROL POINT •� .. CO _RU AN OUT ry IAEY . _ P Px •CANITA [LE •OC •(rlpl{M N CABG[ ry PR B - P Eq. a BEG REFERENCE .iL. ELCC - EDGE OF PAKMENi pau PEFUA,xENT gEFERENLE ... ..' ................:Ix L B. ELECmIC B. ucr.ru,t i ICN FOUND ­CFE7 � ]FELYJkti ENT PSI AZWN SURVEYOR ElN'("EDRCL00RDELEVATIOu FU.DE • 14Y1~S�iT R TW>m LY FCALNIDxOHIR LAA AN' LA oISN RW-NIIA:�R�AGYCuTW' 3 1. FEE IDIDA POWER LAIID LIGHT E, - - Lc "ll 711 LT cn cE EASEM T - E wc. Z' I NGw _ N L DA SDG EN ILE UE.P y ; f NAw ' VERBOCLAD�IVUN IWAB E � �. NPR WUOChR SI ApL W y•��. R psB _ c'"AAicuLATEoxAL RD. E. CBSCP CATOH BSORUCNRE BOC - OFF I AN P ITV �Dll wv INCETaIRLYE H RB . w r[kl Lr.cC gP smFA2r Alfa :, - n aEEI"lIN POLE :'"ls ".dans rr.w COC EED ENDFACNCRETE WATER JAII —w—' HOLE TAMIAlYE�_ MAIL l GTS: FiIAfY 'A1 SOUTH � _ -__ - _ RM DRUM MANHDLE - -- — O LENCTON BOM STATE ROAD NO. 90) — — o - FORE MAIN ANHaE GnuTr LEGEND AT WATCH I METER 1 N 3425 Sf • lew- �� aR Sl— Al a a EY 0 �K �niton ■F iF LANE -' TE3[NlFA1R1x rini YERCA FORRRIGATION OF uL Bc!'L'S.^_ 1ITPLIIyp ry00LE � H• Gq. L ,� I I wsi2.0 _NETERIGATDN br sW rae.l LANDSCAPED ARDS 7. III PUN SET v LT 1 L•_ ,oPEs , P a. u } > INSTALL W= CWPXIC SGLL£ LOT 1 1.92 ACRES 3 SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST ` COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA a 1REFER TO ARCH /MECH OWLS FOR ELECTRICAL GLS AND TELEPHONE SERICES n 2 PN O TO COWSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR IS TO OBTAIN THE LATEST EOTON OF "COLLIER COLI k� 1, _ IITNTIESS STANDARDS NNUAL CONSTRMIOHCTMATERALS ANO WORK -11 ARE TO CONFORM ! 171 E LATEST CDUNn STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS " S ] CONTRACTOR IS TO VERFY SIZE, NATERNL AND CONNECTION POINTS OF Ek WRIER AND SEWER FORCE MAINS PRIOR 10 CONSTRUCTION OF THE DOMESTIC WATER AND SANNARY SEWER SYSTEMS A 71t CONTRAttOA/EUGIxEER OF RECORD MUST' CONTACT COWER C 1 GROWTH NAWEMEU E CULINEERINO SERWCES TO SET UP THE PRE CONSTRUCTION INETINC REFERENCE5 ALL THE WORTH AMERICAN YENTICAL OATUI OF 1986 M 0 (Ww BB). - 5 COR CTOR EXPOSE WATER WAIN AND FURNISH TAPPING SLEEK AND — FOR WATER IETER TAP A ]" POLYET—ENE (P.E) WATER SERVICE LINE FROM NAIN TO METER d T CONTRACTORTO COORDINATE WITH COW[R COUNTY WBUC UTILMES DEPT PRIOR TO THE 'O BEEMBOAAND ORDERINGD/OR OF THE WATER METER ANSACkRWI PREKNRN DEVICE ASSIES'u • - - ALL NON-METALLIC PIPE WILL BE INSTALLED WITH Z PA TO GAUGE. COPPER TRACER WIC[ 0 _ ._ BO SUITABLE COUPLINGS COMPL-I WITH ASTM SPECIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR JOIUINC M ' =X u ASSILEAR NATCRMLS W 11 ALL LNAITE DDIEEC WITER PIPING SHALL BE SCHEDULE AO PVC, OR HOPE SDR -09 W ' 2 ILL R ISN TO BE SDR -26 ASTM C -CODA AND - 212 _ t] Ll IDN PER CTRAi10N DOE' HOT ETCEED 50 FALLONS PER INCH OF PIPE 0 - AMNLTER MILE PE MY OR ION OF HE SYSTEM y »p2 E%FILTRATION OR INFRTPATION TESTS SHALL BEOF I FEET PERFORMED WITH A IININOu PoSITWE HEAD y e B AIR TESTS AS A INTITI1C SHILL CONFORM TO THE TEST PPOCEDF-1117 RE DESCRIBED IN ASTM E N C-626 FOR PE TN C 921 OR CONCRETE PIPE ASTM - A R FOR { rwwl• w• tW� ANPoD APPROPRMTE TF ROCEDUR[5 FOR OTHER NATERIALSN T PP M . A ALL P POSED PIPES SMALL pBE SUITIBLY-IOEHIIFLABLE AS T'0 TENDED USE PER LOCAL CODES: Cn POTABLE/SANITARY/RECLAIMED STALLED W - 1„ -1 t5 METERS 2' OR SMILER WILL BE IN COLLIER COUNTY C 9.. 6 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SERVICE LEAD AND METER BOA 7 _ - E ER ufTER TO BE SI BY COWER DO— PUBLIC UTILITIESE.i CRLREOUIRED IWSPECTIONS REWIRE A 45 HOUR NOTICE OWN H -110S C OWNS AND WILL NINTAIN POTABLE WATER IRRICATION WATER. AND SYST WASTEWATER EMS D • .fit 2 ALL COSTS AND E2PENSES OF - AND ALL REPAIRS, REPLACEMENTS, WINTENINCE AND _ _ II' OSES W RESTORATIONS OF ABOVECROUND IMPRDNEIAENTS PERNNIED WITHIN A COWER CO 11 _ 2 DA REIEN SHEL BE THE SOLC nNANCML RESPONSIBUITY OF THE GRAMOR, rts SUCCESSORS OR h_ GENEMI xDTEz: • • - 8 ACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH [OWER COUNTY AND THE EOR FOR �- 1t °Wl J RFr2y R,• . ALL E.IlTN OF IUSPECPONS DURIuc CONSTRUCTION h f Fr! 2 AR�ExESDiIxC UTE rtIESR SHOWN ON PUNS ARE flASfD ON THE BEST AVA�UBEq IxFOHRwi10N >EY=S(a P 0 To x EDSTIN IME OF PERUTlt II CONTRACTOR S LL FIE v IFY E •'•�Y � - :•]! •.- — OCATION OF ALl IX UTILITIES PRIOR 0 CONSTPUCIION iif J CLEAN-OIRS SHALL WVFGTHE TETTERS YAMTIAY' DR'EAH' INSCRIBED •�b� .I` •.r: DO Ag B BASIS OF BEARING LP - PRRNANEWT CONTROL POINT •� .. CO _RU AN OUT ry IAEY . _ P Px •CANITA [LE •OC •(rlpl{M N CABG[ ry PR B - P Eq. a BEG REFERENCE .iL. ELCC - EDGE OF PAKMENi pau PEFUA,xENT gEFERENLE ... ..' ................:Ix L B. ELECmIC B. ucr.ru,t i ICN FOUND ­CFE7 � ]FELYJkti ENT PSI AZWN SURVEYOR ElN'("EDRCL00RDELEVATIOu FU.DE • 14Y1~S�iT R TW>m LY FCALNIDxOHIR LAA AN' LA oISN RW-NIIA:�R�AGYCuTW' 3 1. FEE IDIDA POWER LAIID LIGHT E, - - Lc "ll 711 LT cn cE EASEM T - E wc. Z' I NGw _ N L DA SDG EN ILE UE.P y ; f NAw ' VERBOCLAD�IVUN IWAB E � �. NPR WUOChR SI ApL W y•��. R psB _ c'"AAicuLATEoxAL RD. E. CBSCP CATOH BSORUCNRE BOC - OFF I AN P ITV �Dll wv INCETaIRLYE H RB . w r[kl Lr.cC gP smFA2r Alfa :, - n aEEI"lIN POLE :'"ls ".dans rr.w COC EED ENDFACNCRETE WATER JAII —w—' HOLE TAMIAlYE�_ MAIL l GTS: FiIAfY 'A1 SOUTH � _ -__ - _ RM DRUM MANHDLE - -- — O LENCTON BOM STATE ROAD NO. 90) — — o - FORE MAIN ANHaE GnuTr LEGEND AT WATCH I METER 1 III] fR v aR Sl— Al a a EY 0 1 �niton ■F iF LANE -' Y' TAPwxG R G.v. J d J_ 1ITPLIIyp ry00LE � H• Gq. L ,� I I wsi2.0 _NETERIGATDN br sW rae.l ,oPEs , P a. u } > a Z✓- �_� O POTABLE k IRRIGATIOB sc4!' INSTALL W= CWPXIC SGLL£ LOT 1 1.92 ACRES 3 SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST ` COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA a 1REFER TO ARCH /MECH OWLS FOR ELECTRICAL GLS AND TELEPHONE SERICES n 2 PN O TO COWSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR IS TO OBTAIN THE LATEST EOTON OF "COLLIER COLI k� 1, _ IITNTIESS STANDARDS NNUAL CONSTRMIOHCTMATERALS ANO WORK -11 ARE TO CONFORM ! 171 E LATEST CDUNn STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS " S ] CONTRACTOR IS TO VERFY SIZE, NATERNL AND CONNECTION POINTS OF Ek WRIER AND SEWER FORCE MAINS PRIOR 10 CONSTRUCTION OF THE DOMESTIC WATER AND SANNARY SEWER SYSTEMS A 71t CONTRAttOA/EUGIxEER OF RECORD MUST' CONTACT COWER C 1 GROWTH NAWEMEU E CULINEERINO SERWCES TO SET UP THE PRE CONSTRUCTION INETINC REFERENCE5 ALL THE WORTH AMERICAN YENTICAL OATUI OF 1986 M 0 (Ww BB). - 5 COR CTOR EXPOSE WATER WAIN AND FURNISH TAPPING SLEEK AND — FOR WATER IETER TAP A ]" POLYET—ENE (P.E) WATER SERVICE LINE FROM NAIN TO METER d T CONTRACTORTO COORDINATE WITH COW[R COUNTY WBUC UTILMES DEPT PRIOR TO THE 'O BEEMBOAAND ORDERINGD/OR OF THE WATER METER ANSACkRWI PREKNRN DEVICE ASSIES'u • - - ALL NON-METALLIC PIPE WILL BE INSTALLED WITH Z PA TO GAUGE. COPPER TRACER WIC[ 0 _ ._ BO SUITABLE COUPLINGS COMPL-I WITH ASTM SPECIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR JOIUINC M ' =X u ASSILEAR NATCRMLS W 11 ALL LNAITE DDIEEC WITER PIPING SHALL BE SCHEDULE AO PVC, OR HOPE SDR -09 W ' 2 ILL R ISN TO BE SDR -26 ASTM C -CODA AND - 212 _ t] Ll IDN PER CTRAi10N DOE' HOT ETCEED 50 FALLONS PER INCH OF PIPE 0 - AMNLTER MILE PE MY OR ION OF HE SYSTEM y »p2 E%FILTRATION OR INFRTPATION TESTS SHALL BEOF I FEET PERFORMED WITH A IININOu PoSITWE HEAD y e B AIR TESTS AS A INTITI1C SHILL CONFORM TO THE TEST PPOCEDF-1117 RE DESCRIBED IN ASTM E N C-626 FOR PE TN C 921 OR CONCRETE PIPE ASTM - A R FOR { rwwl• w• tW� ANPoD APPROPRMTE TF ROCEDUR[5 FOR OTHER NATERIALSN T PP M . A ALL P POSED PIPES SMALL pBE SUITIBLY-IOEHIIFLABLE AS T'0 TENDED USE PER LOCAL CODES: Cn POTABLE/SANITARY/RECLAIMED STALLED W - 1„ -1 t5 METERS 2' OR SMILER WILL BE IN COLLIER COUNTY C 9.. 6 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SERVICE LEAD AND METER BOA 7 _ - E ER ufTER TO BE SI BY COWER DO— PUBLIC UTILITIESE.i CRLREOUIRED IWSPECTIONS REWIRE A 45 HOUR NOTICE OWN H -110S C OWNS AND WILL NINTAIN POTABLE WATER IRRICATION WATER. AND SYST WASTEWATER EMS D • .fit 2 ALL COSTS AND E2PENSES OF - AND ALL REPAIRS, REPLACEMENTS, WINTENINCE AND _ _ II' OSES W RESTORATIONS OF ABOVECROUND IMPRDNEIAENTS PERNNIED WITHIN A COWER CO 11 _ 2 DA REIEN SHEL BE THE SOLC nNANCML RESPONSIBUITY OF THE GRAMOR, rts SUCCESSORS OR h_ GENEMI xDTEz: • • - 8 ACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH [OWER COUNTY AND THE EOR FOR �- 1t °Wl J RFr2y R,• . ALL E.IlTN OF IUSPECPONS DURIuc CONSTRUCTION h f Fr! 2 AR�ExESDiIxC UTE rtIESR SHOWN ON PUNS ARE flASfD ON THE BEST AVA�UBEq IxFOHRwi10N >EY=S(a P 0 To x EDSTIN IME OF PERUTlt II CONTRACTOR S LL FIE v IFY E •'•�Y � - :•]! •.- — OCATION OF ALl IX UTILITIES PRIOR 0 CONSTPUCIION iif J CLEAN-OIRS SHALL WVFGTHE TETTERS YAMTIAY' DR'EAH' INSCRIBED •�b� .I` •.r: DO Ag B BASIS OF BEARING LP - PRRNANEWT CONTROL POINT •� .. CO _RU AN OUT ry IAEY . _ P Px •CANITA [LE •OC •(rlpl{M N CABG[ ry PR B - P Eq. a BEG REFERENCE .iL. ELCC - EDGE OF PAKMENi pau PEFUA,xENT gEFERENLE ... ..' ................:Ix L B. ELECmIC B. ucr.ru,t i ICN FOUND ­CFE7 � ]FELYJkti ENT PSI AZWN SURVEYOR ElN'("EDRCL00RDELEVATIOu FU.DE • 14Y1~S�iT R TW>m LY FCALNIDxOHIR LAA AN' LA oISN RW-NIIA:�R�AGYCuTW' 3 1. FEE IDIDA POWER LAIID LIGHT E, - - Lc "ll 711 LT cn cE EASEM T - E wc. Z' I NGw _ N L DA SDG EN ILE UE.P y ; f NAw ' VERBOCLAD�IVUN IWAB E � �. NPR WUOChR SI ApL W y•��. R psB _ c'"AAicuLATEoxAL RD. E. CBSCP CATOH BSORUCNRE BOC - OFF I AN P ITV �Dll wv INCETaIRLYE H RB . w r[kl Lr.cC gP smFA2r Alfa :, - n aEEI"lIN POLE :'"ls ".dans rr.w COC EED ENDFACNCRETE WATER JAII —w—' HOLE TAMIAlYE�_ MAIL l GTS: FiIAfY 'A1 SOUTH � _ -__ - _ RM DRUM MANHDLE - -- — O LENCTON BOM STATE ROAD NO. 90) — — o - FORE MAIN ANHaE CLD +K TA Tf 17"n16 ]1]f)01 -005 -LAT GnuTr LEGEND Z CWT' a N O aR Sl— Al a a 6 _ - 1�w W -' AP BI— HI.I J d J_ — J 0 br sW rae.l ,oPEs , P a. u } > a Z✓- �_� O iz —p- F LY1 wM T yi Q H CLD +K TA Tf 17"n16 ]1]f)01 -005 -LAT -47;t— w M - SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 61 SOUTH, RANGE 96 E". C LOT a LOT 2 t8O AC!" COLLIER COUNTY, FLORMA z" Ai -RE¢ A-vw. I nme:m' TAMIAMt TRAlt US, HWY. 41 SOUTH w A fkw —11� Mlux-VIAW-4 M, ov pp 41) RW Inr o I M I I inti GW Id,Dt•rT'C T••9CW�y.LES ow— sm— -f &=rq-. --(c -47;t— w M - LOT 4 C LOT a LOT 2 t8O AC!" I.00 Acmm z" Ai -RE¢ A-vw. I nme:m' TAMIAMt TRAlt US, HWY. 41 SOUTH w A fkw —11� Mlux-VIAW-4 M, ftVY.4ft 1*,Ia pp 41) RW Inr o I M I I inti GW Id,Dt•rT'C T••9CW�y.LES ow— sm— -f &=rq-. --(c -47;t— w M - NOTES; nme:m' TAMIAMt TRAlt US, HWY. 41 SOUTH w fkw —11� Mlux-VIAW-4 M, ftVY.4ft 1*,Ia pp 41) RW Inr o I M I I inti GW Id,Dt•rT'C T••9CW�y.LES ow— sm— -f &=rq-. --(c as Ow Z cc 0 —ar� zw- -47;t— w --J Vf -5425.V' FF TAMIAMt TRAlt US, HWY. 41 SOUTH w ftVY.4ft 1*,Ia 41) RW Inr Z 1 J 0 inti GW Id,Dt•rT'C T••9CW�y.LES ow— 0 7 IL Ow Z cc 0 NIM SUMMARY Stor-All Building Rezone (RZ-PL20180000125) November 28, 2018, 5:30 p.m. Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Auditorium 300 Tower Road, Naples, FL, 34113 , The NIM was held for the above referenced petition. The petition is described as follows: 1) An amendment to Ordinance No. 97-3, which rezoned the subject property to a Heavy Commercial (C-5) zoning district conditions, in order to increase the maximum building height to 35 feet; add motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC Code 4225, air conditioned and mini and self -storage warehousing only) as a permitted use; revise other conditions of approval; and eliminate -other permitted C-5 uses on the subject parcel. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio/video recording is also provided. Attendees: On behalf of Applicants: Robert Mulhere, FAICP, VP Planning, Hole Montes Felix Pardo, Architect, Felix Pardo & Associates Chris Mitchell, PE, J.R. Evans Engineering County Staff: Gil Martinez, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section James Sabo,.AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section Approximately 70 members of the public attended. Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the other consultants, and County Staff. He explained the NIM process, the process for approval, and provided a brief history of the site and an overview of the project. Following Mr. Mulhere's presentation, there was approximately one hour and eleven minutes of questions from the public in attendance. The members of the public who attended identified themselves (primarily) as residents of Falling Waters to the north. The following issues were raised: Laudscapine/Stormwater ManazementJMalntenance Several questions were raised regarding the installation and maintenance of perimeter landscape buffers, the perimeter wall, and stormwater management areas. Mr. Mitchell explained that the subject property is included in a unified Site Development Plan (SDP) which includes multiple parcels and a comprehensive landscape and stromwater pan. Prior to the issuance of a CO for the proposed Stor-All development, stormwater management areas and landscape buffers must be in place for all parcels included on the Master Plan. Maintenance of the landscaping is the responsibility collectively of the owners of these SDP parcels. Mr. Mulhere is going to research options regarding the maintenance of the landscRping and wall, with particular consideration for maintenance access to the landscaping on the north (Fallin:g Waters side of the wall). Other questions were raised regarding stormwater management and drainage. Mr. Mitchell stated that water management areas are depicted on the Master Plan and must meet all Collier County and South Page 1 of 2 HA201812018069MM MINIM Summary (11-30-18).doex Florida Water Management District requirements. Water will not drain toward the Falling Waters community, instead draining to US 41 through an outfall on the west side of the development. . Design Questions were raised regarding the height of the proposed building, the size of the units, and the colors of the building. The proposed building is setback 137 feet from the rear (north) property line adjacent to Falling Waters. This is more than twice the 60 -foot setback required per Ordinance 97-3. The office and loading areas have been setback even further from Falling Waters and are orientated so that they are not visible from the rear. Units are accessed from inside the building and will vary in size. As this is household storage only, most of the units are expected to be less than 150 square feet. There will be no elevated lighting installed adjacent to Falling Water as this area will be solely be utilized for stormwater management, with no access or vehicular use areas. Mr. Pardo explained that the color palette used in the rendering on display is expected to be that utilized on the final design. Additional concern was raised regarding the building height. Mr. Mulhere explained that the increase is minimal and needed to accommodate three stories. The roof deck is flat, so there will be no gables or slopes that will be visible to Falling Waters. A line of sight exhibit looking to the south was requested. Mr. Pardo agreed to provide this, as viewed from.the second floor of units in Falling Waters closest to the subject site, and comparing what is permitted now - a 28 foot tall building, with a 60 fbof setback — to what is proposed — a +/- 33 foot tall building with a 137 foot setback. General/Misc. General questions were asked regarding operations. The building will be staffed. Due to the nature of household storage and the size of the units, there will most likely be a maximum of two employees. Large moving trucks are not expected, again due to the small size of -the units. In any case, the vehicular activity is limited to the front and font half of the west side of the parcel. There is an existing self -storage facility located within the Falling Waters community. Concerns were raised that this could potentially force the closure of either of these facilities. Mr. Mulhere explained that Stor-All performed extensive market analysis before deciding on the subject property and that there is still a strong market for self -storage after accounting for existing storage facilities in the surrounding area. Members of the public requested that public hearings be held during the season, when most of the \ residents will be in their homes. Mr. Mulhere explained that hearing dates are dependent on the' completion of the staff review. Mr. Mulhere and County Staff indicated that application materials are available to the public via the county website. L The nleela g concluded u1 Q?praximately 6:50 PM_. Page 2 of 2 H:\2018\2018069\WP\NIMVW Summary (11-30-18),doox Naptrs:43afiij Tcrws NaplesNews.mm Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally, appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed In Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached Copy of the advertising was published in said newspapper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na- ples, in said Collier Count,+, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first pubHcation of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund far the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copy ine HOLE MONTES INC Pub Dates November 13, 2018 (Sign Lure of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me This November 13, 2018 and (Signature of affiant) 2161060 Rookery Bay National ..'y P.O.# f , I' VL" Hotr I'uHk-Slakafilodda �� CPmmkik 1CrITGMI ` kyCnmm.ErplrnlWLRiaz1 9ar r� m+�alhra��wuanJAl+quu. P.O.# Naples man dies after tire blowout on Interstate 4 Jac Ica RodrlBuez Jon MaeDonough, 47, was traveling N.pl.. C:= •,:"tbuund on I-4 when the blowout UsA TooAY rATYYt1RN-nORIDA Doused him to lose control of the RV, which hit a light poor and turned over, A Naples man died Sunday afternoon the PHP rnpnrt said in PolkUbuntyeIIer¢tbe on his RVbtow MmDoliuugl[was weeringa meat belt out cry int acetous 4. Lim! Floddn RuTway enol swJa pmnounsed Bend at t he tame, Patrol reported. PHP said. Police: Man, 19, sped at 93 mph on I-75 in Lee, had gun, drugs From Staff Reports Sandflyt N.pl•. D.artr 7'he 00per safdfhe Years esdted the usA roDAYNrrvvoas-rLORIDA hipjrwny at Corksnaw Rnud, with the driver trying to tum right onto Cork - A Bonita Springs man was arrestedsorewagainstaredlight. Thedriver,lat- onmultiplechrrgesSundaymomingaf- er Identified as Medina, lost control and ter a chase on Interstate 75 ended In a traveled across the Corkscrew lanes for csesh oncorkscrewRoad westbound traffic, across the grass me - In R-hrmur the Florida dim mid Into the path of a Fred N-35[1, Higl ovay Fithm] reported, raauldng in a nraah, vF4P mpotied. Mnrk.Madino,2rI, wasee Medina then Ovd on loaf, troopnre tlnnked Into She Lsold, but he gul kly w..raughtwlthnnS County .sail and hold 6'thor Innident orinilny. without hag, tali recnffis The chalgeo against MerBna Include Medina show. The charges possession of nrtcorlo drug: (Oxym: against him Incladn pas- done); pasaesslnst or =eotles with in sessllm of weapons and narcotics, as tent to dhilribum; gun "orwalon by a well as seeing Olid eluding, asmvinlrd fenny possesrsfon of a stolen A state trooper reported trying to firearm; a gun offense while committing stop a Ford Focus speeding south at 93 a felony; and operating a motor vehicle mph on Interstate 75 at Altco Road In without a license: south Lee County shortly after 10 a.m. A Ford Focus Involved In a chase on Interstate 75 and crash on Corkscrew Road on Sunday, GREG BUEND/FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL NN �1 1 MUM Ullr.low welf.a.aan F..1-0raln Hyar:lh... py 5"al.p4o H.dd.how.r T..hnol.9y aAb J.I. r --D 13 a0 AD IDRAD 00011[0 n — 0000 000 000 0 0000 ®m00 0 00000 © (239) 307-2965 -: ReMrs.:ww. �sh Lt71 IN<THE U. A- 1101111 IMO .00000010 0010 OUGM DO® 0000000 00100000 OD00000000 DO®mO®0 Onnmm OOm'inloo mom m Ounaocuoum00 D Doo®Oo0ona➢m 000nam Onoa o0m00D00011 BBD®Oil 000 ODm1m 300003111 Bit OfflO o DO DDD 00 WOmIDmm OM000mom0 mmOD 011)(10001110 001®0 0010 ® 00®000 MDDOO GDOoo00Omu®OD mm0 [[]DO 0000 D00000®O Do OODmo 000000 00 000ZOG D ®O 0mOm00 000000000 m000m OD000um0 OD00D00DO Ommull O DOMOMID 000®0 Ommoum oil Gloom GO Om0ml mID DOnmo000u 00000 00 DOG Om00 0® 000 Om000OMOMO O0pO00IID®®0 0000013000OODO MOm0OD00 Om® O0m mommo m 00 Dom 00 000 oum NAPLESNEWS.COM 1 TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2018 1 9A Naples Beauty, Not Naples Prices Botox $101 unit Fillers start @ $500 Total Aesthetics: • Skin resurfacing and tightening -- -:Rr • Brown spots •Acne scars Spider veins, vascular lesions Hair removal , rVisrn rfwirir�rd rf� rcr;irr/. ' _, co MPARE ;20 off Or.l20 ;SO a110rs1 ANDS AVE I unita of Botoxof Rlln,; I„I f �lwr•Ilm, nllnil.-rr. Uml.d rhiJrrr E It starts with you. O�QI o a �I;] 1YY911ll11740ff i7 ln7 amM 0IIIm®ITIN11 0 0 0000 mtMm®®mo DOOM0111=0 0 000 DEM MM 000 CRISTINA 5CIAVOLINO-DAV MD, LLC (239)596-8702 1175 Craakside Porkway • Saila OIT= 00000 000 r11 The public is Invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Robert J. Mulbere, FAICP, Vice President or Hole Monies, Inc., on behalf of the applicant at the t'ollowing time and location: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 5:30 p.m. Rookery Bay Nntlonal Estuarine Research Reserve Auditorium 300 Tower Road, Naples, FL 34113 Felix Pardo, Felix Pardo & Assoclates, representing Stor-All Acquisitions, LLC, has made an application to Collier County to amend Ordinance No. 97-3, which rezoned the subject properly to a Heavy Commercial (C-5) zoning district with conditions, In order to: • Increase the maximum bulldiug height to 35 feel; • Add motor freight transportation and warchousing (SIC Code 4225, air conditioned and mini -and self storage warehousing only) us a permitted use; • Revise other conditions of approval; and • Eliminate other permitted C-5 uses on the subject parcel. The subject property is located on the north side of U.S. 41 East, approximately 1,200 feel east of Collier Boulevard, In Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2.28± acres. Slor-AlfAcqulsl0ons, LLC WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business Rnd properly owners, resldenis aad vlsllors ase welcome to attend the prescnWlion and discuss the project with the owner and Collier County stuff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions orcomments, they can be directed by mail, phone, or a -moil to: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Vice Prcstden t, P1Rnning Services Hole Monies, Inc. 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239.254-2000; Dim& bobHndI aro@hmon0-rnrR Nuv ,13.2o1s ND-216Iw. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, as amended, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the County to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. of Applicant) ROBERT J. MULHERE, FAICP_ (Printed name of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 11th Day of November 2018, by ROBERT J. MULHERF., FAICP, who is person 4l y known to me or who has produced as identification. H;\2018\2018069\WP\NIM\Affidavlt of Compliance NIM (11-13-2018).doc (Signathre of Notary Public) f() (Notary Seal) Printed Name of Notary - A�j+hy STEPHANIE MR.01. '.liir Notary Purina - Slati of Florida . •` Commlsaloo OfF.9399l0 My Comm. Explr;t Mar 9, ?020 BMW On* FWonxl Iror4Alen. H;\2018\2018069\WP\NIM\Affidavlt of Compliance NIM (11-13-2018).doc IRM HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS 950 Encore Way - Naples, Florida 34110 • Phone 239.254.2000 • Fax; 239.254.2099 November 13, 2018 Re: Stor-All Building Rezone (RZ-PL20180000125) HM File No.: 2018.069 Dear Property Owner: Felix Pardo, Felix Pardo & Associates, representing Stor-All Acquisitions, LLC, has made an application to Collier County to amend Ordinance No. 97-3, which rezoned the subject property to a Heavy Commercial (C-5) zoning district with conditions, in order to: • Increase the maximum building height to 35 feet; • Add motor freight transportation -and warehousing (SIC Code 4225, air conditioned and mini -and self storage warehousing only) as a permitted use; • Revise other conditions of approval; and • Eliminate other permitted C-5 uses on the subject parcel. The subject property is located on the north side of U.S. 41 East, approximately 1,200 feet east of Collier Boulevard, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2.28± acres. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, the Applicant along with Robert J. Mulhere, FACIP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., will conduct a Neighborhood Information Meeting to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this petition and to ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 5:30 p.m. at the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Auditorium, 300 Tower Road, Naples FL, 34113. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please feel free to contact me at 239-254-2000. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Vice President, Planning and Business Development RJM/sek H:\2018\2018069\WP\I WStor-AII NIM Property Notification Letter (11-13-2018).doex Naples • Fort Myers Wo 2.410 FWBR IV TRUST 6810 BEACH RESORT DR #2410 NAPLES, FL 34114---1514 09 X8/09 L9® �JaAV oaAB algl}Bdwoo ww L9 x ww 9z ImAol op 91490113 ������ 09 G9/09 G9® I JaAV gjlM algllBdwoo .,9/9 z'x I. ezls lopq ANGELHOW FAMILY TRUST II - ARATA, PATRICIA M 55 JANET TERRACE 4321 TAYLOR RD I I NEW HARTFORD, NY 13413---2820 FORT WAYNE, IN 46804---1911 ARMSTRONG, FRANCIS & DENISE ARNOLD S DEJONG REV LIVTRUST 3041 GOLDEN ORCHARD DRIVE ! 6849 W FOSS ROAD MISSISSAUGA, ON MONEE, IL 60449---0000 CANADA L4X 2V1 l BARRON SR, ROBERT E & ELLEN BATES TRUST NO CAB 98-2 9588 HEMINGWAY LN APT 3506 929 COLLIER CT #6102 FORT MYERS, FL 33913---7062 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145---0000 i BELANGER, MARC BIBIK, RAYMOND W & KAY F NATHALIE SIMARD 6800 BEACH RESORT DR #12 3537 CH ST LOUIS #510 NAPLES, FL 34114---1508 ' QUEBEC CITY, QC CANADA G1W 0134 - BOYLE, PHILLIP C BROWN, SHELDON L 6820 BEACH RESORT DR #8 LINDA V FOSTER -BROWN NAPLES, FL 34114---1519 100 HOLLINS ROAD LANDENBERG, PA 19350---0000 BURLING, GEOFFREY & BARBARA CARANO, DENISE WOODGATES MELFORD RD7736 CORNELLAVE CAVENDISH SAINT LOUIS, MO 63130---2801 SUFFOLK ENGLAND COLO 8AD CLAVET, WILLIAM A & TARYL D i I COX TR, DENNIS T 1460 OLIVER ROAD -FRANCES K COX TR THUNDER BAY, ON ° COX LIVING TRUST CANADA P7G 1N6 f UTD 09/28/10 5708 PRAIRIE STONE DR MC FARLAND, WI '53558 --- 8461 CROCKER, VICKI L DALTON, JOHN J & MARGARET A 6560 BEACH RESORT DR #2811 258 MCCONNELL AVE NAPLES, FL 34114---7546 BAYPORT, NY 11705---0000 l DIGNAM, BONNIE f DIPPOLD, LEE MARTIN 214 RIVER DR 1 J DEBBIE ANN DIPPOLD APPLETON, WI 54915--1211 1 614 WOODSID PL TOMS RIVER, NJ 08753--0000 DRAKE, DONALD M & CAROL A DRAVIS, DORLA & DEAN D 6810 BEACH RESORT DR #3 9 WALKER CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---1512 i GIRARD, OH 44420---1275 BALY, PAMELA 403 N PROSPECT MANOR MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056---0000 BEES, KAROLYN 6830 BEACH RESORT DR #2605 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 BOROWSKI, JAMES D JOSEPH M BOROWSKI 6830 BEACH RESORT DR #3 NAPLES, FL 34114---1521 BUOY, HARRY W & EVELLA J 6604 CARLISLE BEND SPRINGFIELD, IL 62711---0000 CHRISTOPHER JR, ANTHONY 37 DELHAM AVE (UPPER) BUFFALO, NY 14216---0000 CPI NAPLES LLC CPI NAPLES IV LLC FEM NAPLES LLC 235 MOORE ST # 300 HACKENSACK, NJ 07601---0000 DAVID & KATHLEEN RACO RV TRUST 1388 ABBOT WAY DELAND, FL 32724--=0000 DOTZENROTH, RONALD T & LINDA C 35152 MEADOW LN FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48335---2534 DUBOIS, GILLES DIANE BERGEVIN SEBASTIEN DUBOIS ETAL 32 RUE VIGNEAULT SAINT CONSTANT, QC CANADA J5A1N8 QTA 1) p`� label slze 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery @5160/8160 �finiiM+n fin fnmint 9F mm v R7 mm r'mmnatihla avar. AvFry (R.ri1 Fn/R1fin• b''AA Vt?o 091-9/0919® (.IanV Dane alglJedwoo ww Zg x ww 9Z jumoJ op e}Ienb4 �� 091-9/09 L96 AAAV gjIM 9lgljedw6o „8/9 Z.x „I. azls legel ����� DUNN, ANTOINETTE DUNN, GEORGE R & MARY T j DZUBIC, ISMET 6800 RESORT BEACH DR #15 6820 BEACH RESORT DR #3 ` 5118 201ST N NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---1517 j i ' FOREST LAKE, MN 55025---0000 I E W OLSON & J E OLSON TRUST ` EATON FAMILY TRUST r ELDEEB, MOHAMED & KATHLEEN . 1 242 S PRINCETON AVE 20036 POLLYANNA DR I 6840 BEACH RESORT DR #2714 ITASCA, IL 60143---2175 LIVONIA, MI 48152---1275 NAPLES, FL 34114---1529 I l ELIA, BARBARA J _ ELLIOTT, JUDY L EL-MASRI, MOURAD S & ELAINE L 6810 BEACH RESORT DR #7 I 6820 BEACH RESORT DR #15 ` TANYA K EL-MASRI NAPLES, FL 34114---1513 NAPLES, FL 34114--1520 I SHAHIRAJ EL-MASRI 25 MAPLE HATCH CLOSE SURREY ENGLAND GU71TQ ~ FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT j FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT MASTER, ASSOCIATION INC I MASTER ASSOCIATION INC MASTER ASSOCIATION INC 1330 RAIL HEAD BLVD STE 4 l 1330 RAIL HEAD BLVD STE 4 1330 RAIL HEAD BLVD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34110---8428 NAPLES, FL 34110---8428 NAPLES, FL 34110---8428 FERRAIUOLO, FRANK M &JANET f FORGIONE, MICHAEL R j FOX ET AL, NINA DOROTHY 50 GARY PL MARGARET D FARGIONE I 6810 BEACH RESORT DR #15 ` STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314--3739 3 WATERVIEW HGTS ROAD NAPLES, FL 34114---1515 P OBOX 529 NORTH TRURO, MA 02652---0000 FULLER, ROBERT & JOAN M FUNG, ALFRED Y & IRENE GALIANO, LINDA 2591 FURLONG RD 6840 BEACH RESORT DR #2 92 HOAGLAND ROAD DOYLESTOWN, PA 18902---1689 r NAPLES, FL 34114---1526 BLAIRSTOWN, NJ 07825---0000 4_ l GAVOR, LINDA 1 GENARD, BARBARA GIFFORD, RONALD M & KAREN J 65.60 BEACH RESORT DRIVE #1 9 FORTY OAKS RD 6830 BEACH RESORT DR #9 NAPLES, FL 34114--0000 WHITE HSE STA, NJ 08889---3120 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 GOEDE ESQTRI'JOHN C . r GORDON JOHN BATES REV GORENCE, THOMAS & HOLLY V RNB LAND TRUST LIVING TRUST 56205 VILLAGE DR UTD 01/19/11 17437 AVERH ILL BLVD LA QUINTA, CA 92253---0000 jl 8950 FONTANA DEL SOL WAY # 100 MACOMB, MI 48042--4139 NAPLES, FL 34109--4420 GREEN, DAVID A & LUCY GREENLEE, DAVID D &JUDITH K 1 GURUNLIAN, HAIGANOUSH 6820 BEACH RESORT DR 42511 3104 EAST WASHINGTON STREET I I 6840 BEACH RESORT DR #16 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 BLOOMINGTON, IL 61704---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---1529 HADLOCK, DOUGLAS M &JILL M HADLOCK, DOUGLAS M &JILL M HAMMER, KIM,BERLYJANE 50 HIGHVIEW TER ! I 50 HIGHVIEW TERRACE 6790 BEACH RESQRT DR #13 MANCHESTER, NH 03104---4718 f MANCHESTER, NH 03104---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 kni iatia Hn fnrmnt 9.1i mm x R7 mm rni-nnatlhlc? uno Mery 05160/8160 04A Wo 0919/09190 AJOAV NA2 algl}edwoo ww L9 x ww gz pewJoJ op aa4.anb!13��� 0918/09190 AJany QAA elgIjudwoD „B/9 Zx ,1 azls lagal HEATHER M LESLIE TRUST IULA, NANCY C i JACOBSON, BARRY & GAIL R 6840 BEACH RESORT DR #7 2031 E 67TH ST i 1 6840 BEACH RESORT DR #11 NAPLES, FL 34114---1527 BROOKLYN, NY 11234---0000 i NAPLES, FL 34114---1528 i I JOAN BARKELLTRUST JOANNE M RUSSELL REV TRUST JOSEPH D EBERT REV TRUST 606 FOREST RD I 1225 DAISY LANE f SUZANNE M EBERT REVTRUST LA GRANGE PK, IL 60526---5617 EAST LANSING, MI 48823---0000 I ! 30026 JUDSON LANE I ` I I� DAGSBORO, DE 19939---3381 7� JOUWSTRA, PETER & SHARLENE I KELLY, SHERRIE & MATTHEW KESTEN, LOUIS J & LAURA E 6840 BEACH RESORT DR #10 I 45 SHORE RD i 6203 INTERLAKEN WAY NAPLES, FL 34114---1528 MOUNTSINAI, NY 11766---1419 PROSPECT, KY 40059---8560 KINSELLA, RYNE WILLIAM ji I k KOCH TR, FRANK C KRG 951 & 41 LLC 10739 S PULASKI RD I PATRICIA M KOCH TR 30 S.MERIDIAN ST STE 1100 CHICAGO, IL 60655---3937 F C & P M KOCH IT DEC OF TRUST INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204---3565 UTD 08/30/10 I ; 6790 BEACH RESORT DR #8 l i NAPLES, FL 34114--1502 l KRISANDA, RONALD 1 LAFONTAINE FAMILYTRUST LAVIN, PATRICIA ELLEN i GERALDINE M KRISANDA 7011 WILDFLOWER COURT I 6820 BEACH RESORT DR #12 6560 BEACH RESORT DR #3 SPRING GROVE, IL 60081---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---1519 NAPLES, FL 34114---7545 i LEMANSKI, DENNIS R & BARBARA A LEON, ROBERT N LETZNER, GEORGE H & JOY A 26034 YORKSHIRE PL 7857 FIRESTONE LANE I 6800 BEACH RESORT DR #14 GROSSE ILE, MI 48138-1886 ` WASHINGTON TWP, MI 48094--3443 NAPLES, FL 34114---1509 LUYBER, JOSEPH A & CARLA G 1 MAGNANI, THOMAS N & HELEN MARTIN, IRENE . 82 OCEAN AVE 42 UNION PL 6790 BEACH RESORT DR #2 WARETOWN, NJ 08758---2352 ISLIP, NY 11751--4714 NAPLES, FL 34114'--1501 MCCONNELL, LAURENCE M i MCCONNELL, LAURENCE MICHAEL MILLER, ANDREW & WENDY ELISE R MYSKER 6840 BEACH RESORT DR 12 EAST DR • 7022 LIVE OAK DRIVE � � NAPLES , FL 34114--0000 LINWOOD, NJ 08221---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 ' t MORGANTE, NOEMI AMIE I I NADEAU, DAVID A & SUSAN NANTZ, KIRK D & MARY BETH 6840 BEACH RESORT DRIVE #2704 '6560 BEACH RESORT DR #2 630 BIMINI AVE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 ; NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 i MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145---3810 PATRIOT PLACETRUST PAULA MARTIN LIVTRUST II PIRJOL, DANIELA 13245 TAMIAMI TRL E i BARBARA A MARTIN LIV TRUST ! 35 LONGWOOD AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 6820 BEACH RESORT DR # 6 RICHMOND HILL, ON NAPLES, FL 34114---1518 CANADA L4E 4A5 jyL ® Fr-"% label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 �tiniiatta rin fnrmat 7.r, mm v R7 mm rmmnatlhla attar. AiiPrtl (751An/216(1 11AA VV0 REFERENCE ONLY FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT IV A CONDOMINIUM ROOK AT NAPLES II LLC 4828 ASHFORD DUNWOODY RD # 400 ATLANTA, GA 30338---0000 ROSCOE APARTMENTS LLC 114 SUBURBAN ACRES CARMICHAELS, PA 15320---0000 SAL &JO GEORATO REVTRUST 20324 CASTLEMAINE AVE ESTERO, FL 33928---3415 SEILER JR, RICHARD R KAREN LEAHY-SEILER 500 STH ST CARNEGIE, PA 15106---2533 SWABIAN TR, RONALD J JOHN H SURABIAN TRUST ANTOINE17E M SURABIAN TRUST PO BOX 58 WEST HARWICH, MA 02671---0000 SZABO, RONALD W & 1AMCE'A 14512 66TH CT OAK FOREST, IL 60452--4803 VILLARI III, PHILIP A ANGELA MINOLFO VILLARI 398 W VALLEY FORGE RD KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406---1881 WHITE, JAMES W & GLENDA F 6390 WILLOW RD W BLOOMFIELD, MI 48324---2047 WOLTERS. RAYMOND & MARY 6790 BEACH RESORT DR#15 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 0918/0919® fu9AV oone alglTedwoo alai L9 X ww 9Z TEwa01 op 91490113 ��� � 0918/0919® r<JaAV UTIM algRedwoo „9/9 Z X,, I, ozls la9el � y ROBERT G HABER REV TRUST ROBERTS, PAUL & CAROLYN r 6840 BEACH RESORT DR #1 I 418 BEAVER AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34114---1526 THUNDER BAY, ON ` I CANADA P7G21-12 ` ROOK AT NAPLES II LLC ROOK AT NAPLES II LLC 4828 ASHFORD DUNWOODY RD # 400 4828 ASHFORD DUNWOODY RD # 400 ATLANTA, GA 30338---0000 ATLANTA, GA 30338--0000 l ROSSER, BRUCE &•LAURIE E RUSSELL REALTY TRUST 126 PIPERS INN DR 17 LEHAN STREET i FOUNTAINVILLE, PA 18923---0000 CANTON, MA 02021---3107 SCHULTZ, RANDALL D SCULLY, JOHN K & ELIZABETH A 6560 BCH RESORT DR#4 351 UNION ST NAPLES, FL 34114--0000 HOLJ3ROOK, MA 02343--1330 SIMMS, CARLTON W SOLOMON, SHARYN E SIMMS INVESTMENTS LLC I 375 BROADWAY SPC 242 C/O DDOUGLAS M SIMMS SR j LYNNFIELD, MA 01940---0000 11311 NORTH CLUB DRIVE FREDERICKSBURG, VA 22408--0000 5&T0, ERNEST & BARBARA r SWEET NORMAN C & JACQUELINE K • 24 DUDLEY ST 13927 DEVIAR DR WEST MILFORD, NJ 07480---4323 CENTREVILLE, VA 20120---1224 THURMAN, JERRY G & LEATHA L VERMELLE A IANOTTA REV TRUST 6790 BEACH RESORT -DR 2206 6840 BEACH RESORT DR #15 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114--1529 l _ WEINERT, ROBERT K & LAURA M WEINRAUCH, JOHN R& JUDITH A 37 LEXINGTON DRIVE I i 6840 BEACH RESORT DR #2703 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590---0000 i NAPLES, FL 34114---1526 WIGHTMAN, GARY S WILSON, JOSEPH & MARGUERITE 6560 BEACH RESORT DR #2807 6830 BEACH RESORT DR #14 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 j NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 WORSDALE, PAUL & JOAN M ti ZOFCHAK, MICHAEL D KATIE WORSDALE MARTIN M ZOLFCHAK 855 ELKHORN COURT #524 6810 BEACH RESORT DRIVE #5 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114--.-0000 STAR�E�� label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ,� rte. fitlnnette rin fnrmat 25 mm u 67 mm com0atihle aver Avery 05130/8160 nAA 09 L9/09& dJany aaA8 ajgpedwoo ww Lg x ulw qz }8waof ap aue0bq , O9jaj09L4®Aaany Lgjm olgll8dwoo „9/9 d x „L ozls lagel Falling Waters Beach Resort Phase I Falling Waters Beach Resort Phase II ; East Naples Civic Association c/o Tom Campbell c/o Thomas Powers ' 3823 Tamiami Trail E #274 6620 Beach Resort Drive, #9 6660 Beach Resort Drive, #6 Naples, FL 34112 Naples, FL 34114 Naples, FL 34114 j East Naples Civic Association P M B #49 8595 Collier Blvd., Suite 107 Naples, FL 34114-3556 .I i ! S I � I I I " I I II I I - il i I ,• I • f I 'r _i ' I I ....-- - label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/81!60 ' biduette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING STOR-ALL BUILDING REZONE (RZ-PL-20180000125) WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2018 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***-please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E -Mail Address t. y/ y l�c7N L/c i �' iG- pori 17/ae2 Cl co 3o q 3 AL)iQ' v car C, e # L' qhs .3y// Avv,_ t --(0 L_1 vo/at 20 3 �C 3 � taL r 61 e S/�r f / /a &cAsx, 6-130 6eDcLorf N17� /V �P�S 3`f /I `f 13, -AIr `` ``-� t ' '''`� /' Ll Acra Cam 3 ti NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING STOR-ALL BUILDING REZONE (RZ-PL-20180000125) WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2018 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***Piense be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. I NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING STOR-ALL BUILDING REZONE (RZ-PL-20180000125) WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2018 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***-please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E -Mail Address -7 30 o r � f f, ° 6653c Iy . RCS Lys Fz��JC 6b"� �cart2t', �c y C �C QQi IZL� 410 Cti \ - EL `ZG _� lJ f ao (o (QD��j,c��f re L V-1 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING STOR-ALL BUILDING REZONE (RZ-PL-20180000125) WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2018 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***PLease be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E -Mail Address �eL iiLlrJiSGRLe 7 ��_� r Nt'4-�e�-2-J r,uc sy i Ac OF ���� �_ cam•' ��-� . � Q � h�. ��l- ca�� �LD a r('_ , l �r� X61 n, r 1 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING STOR-ALL BUILDING REZONE (RZ-PL-20180000125) WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2018 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***Tease be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. if you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name I Address City, State Zip E -Mail Address 1)tuie 0(on �zc' G Pv-x- a -� L I u ( D ryl GcS L'_' 4( 7±C�,0 oaj _z - �-t iQ u � C v.3 �✓U� �� 7 � 7��� �C..�� �C� :� 1 i 3l ss 1 _ ,17'� NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING STOR-ALL BUILDING REZONE (RZ-PL-20180000125) WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2018 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***Please be advbsed*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E -Mail Address L 21, TPBDIICOCR plenninp•enpineerieN Traffic Impact Statement 13245 Trail East Conditional Use - MOT Permitting Prepared for: Davidson Engineering, Inc. 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: 239-434-6060 Collier County, FL 4/15/2014 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Analysis has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Table of Contents Page Project Description Trip Generation 6 - 8 Trip Distribution and Assignment 9 Site Access Turn Lane Analysis 10-12 Improvement Analysis — Conclusions 12 Mitigation of Impact 12 Appendix F: Excerpts from "Project Traffic Technical Memorandum —US 41 & CR 951— Intersection Improvement, September 2010", prepared by Stanley Consultants, Inc. (5 Sheets) Appendix G: FDOT Comments - Responses (3 Sheets) 3 Collier County— Approved Initial Meeting Checklist (5 Sheets) Appendix A: Appendix B: Project Master Concept Plan (2 Sheets) Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations (1 Sheet) Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits (2 Sheets) Appendix E: HCS Printouts (7 Sheets) Appendix F: Excerpts from "Project Traffic Technical Memorandum —US 41 & CR 951— Intersection Improvement, September 2010", prepared by Stanley Consultants, Inc. (5 Sheets) Appendix G: FDOT Comments - Responses (3 Sheets) 3 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Project Description The 13245 Trail East project is located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41), just east of Collier Boulevard, in Collier County, Florida. The zoning classification of the subject property was approved as commercial intermediate for Retail, Office and Restaurant and other uses subject to conditions per Collier County, Ord. #05-35. The project lies in Section 03, Township 51 South and Range 26 East. Refer to Fig. 1 — Project Location Map, which follows and Appendix B — Project Master Site Plan. Fig. 1- Project Location Map lel r•• ^` 951 J' S! Wrg1Yd �y Andte .� � 1 l , • F s 'O Naples �. Manor 0 LD �, „► f i . Re>Far� aDN' 40K tr 451 PROJECT $ ��E � LaC ATION 41 * n . X ' (ower RA - Manatee Rd U lei 4 13254 Trail East – Conditional Use – TIS — April 2014 The current approved zoning condition and proposed rezone development programs are illustrated in the Table 1. Table 1 — Development Program Notes: *35,000 sf is within the subject CU parcel and 9,500 sf is within the adjacent parcel under the same ownership. Refer to Appendix B. The site proposes to connect to US 41 via the existing main access — directional left -in/ right -in/ right -out. The internal site circulation system proposes interconnections with adjacent sites. ITE Land Planning Development Land Use Use Code Total Size Buildout Year Horizon Year High Turnover 932 6,000sf N/A N/A (Sit -Down) Restaurant Drive-in Bank 912 6,000sf N/A N/A Curren! Medical-i7ental tafEice Zoning Building 720 36,000sf N/A N/A Conditions Fast -Food Restaurant 934 3,500sf N/A N/A with Drive Thru TOTAL 51, 500sf Proposed Rezone Shopping Center 820 44,500sf* 2019 21 Conditions Notes: *35,000 sf is within the subject CU parcel and 9,500 sf is within the adjacent parcel under the same ownership. Refer to Appendix B. The site proposes to connect to US 41 via the existing main access — directional left -in/ right -in/ right -out. The internal site circulation system proposes interconnections with adjacent sites. 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Trip Generation The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9t"' Edition. The software program Otiss — Online Traffic Impact Study Software (Version 2.1.0.15) is used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE rates were used for Restaurant and Bank land uses, while ITE equations were utilized for Medical -Dental Office Building and Shopping Center uses. Trip reductions — internal capture and pass by - have been applied per ITE 9th Edition Manual and Collier County traffic impact study guidelines and procedures. The detailed results of the trip generation calculations can be found in Appendix C — ITE Trip Generation Calculations. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. The internal capture for the project is limited by the Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures to a maximum of 20% of the total project trips. For Current Zoning Conditions, a conservative 10% internal capture was accounted for all land uses. The proposed rezone project is based on a single -use Retail — Shopping Center scenario. Therefore, no internal capture is considered for this phase. The pass -by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. Consistent with Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, and ITE 9th Edition, the pass -by rates for PM peak hour traffic were used as follows: 40% for High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant; 47% for Drive-in Bank; 50% for Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window; and 25% for Shopping Center. Table 2A reflects the site -generated trips for PM peak hour trips under the current zoning conditions. Table 213 illustrate the potential traffic generation for the new proposed Rezone development. 6 13254 Trail East – Conditional Use – TIS — April 2014 Table 2A — Trip Generation — Current Zoning Conditions — Average Weekday Development Daily Two -Way Volume PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Enter Enter Exit Total LUC 932 - High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 6,000sf 763 35 24 59 LUC 912 - Drive-in Bank 6,0000 889 73 73 146 LUC 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building 36,000sf 1,301 32 84 116 LUC 934 - Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive Through Window_ 3,5005f 1,736 _ 4,689 59 55 114 Total Driveway 51,500sf 1 199 236 435 Internal Capture* -19 -22 -41 Total External Pass -By Trips** 180 214 394 -70 -66 1 -136 Total to adjacent streets 110 148 258 Notes:* Internal Capture –10% for all land uses; ** Pass -By Trips – 40% High Turnover Restaurant; 47% Drive-in Bank; 50% Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window. Table 2B — Trip Generation — Proposed Rezone Conditions — Average Weekday Development Daily Two -Way Volume PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Enter Exit Total LUC 820 Shopping Center 44,500sf*** 4,012 167 181 348 Total Driveway 4,012 167 181 348 Internal Capture* N/A N/A N/A Total External 167 181 348 Pass -By Trips** -42 -45 -87 Total to adjacent streets 125 136 261 Notes:* Internal Capture – N/A, accounted for inherently in mixed land use; ** Pass -By Trips – up to 25% for Shopping Center; ***35,000 sf is within the subject CU parcel and 9,500 sf is within the adjacent parcel under the same ownership. Refer to Appendix B. 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Table 2C — Development — Net New Traffic — Average Weekday The net new projected traffic, presented in Table 2C, is what will be used for the trip distribution and assignment in the roadway link analysis. Due to minimal impact (1.2%) the added projected traffic under the rezone conditions is considered insignificant. The total external trips illustrated in Table 2B — PM peak hour (Enter 167 and Exit 181) — are to be used for the site access turn lane analyses. PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Proposed Rezone Conditions 44,500sf 125 136 261 Current Zoning Conditions 51,5005f 110 148 258 Net New Traffic -7,000sf 15 -12 3 The net new projected traffic, presented in Table 2C, is what will be used for the trip distribution and assignment in the roadway link analysis. Due to minimal impact (1.2%) the added projected traffic under the rezone conditions is considered insignificant. The total external trips illustrated in Table 2B — PM peak hour (Enter 167 and Exit 181) — are to be used for the site access turn lane analyses. 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Trip Distribution and Assignment The net new traffic generated by the development was assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area and as coordinated with Collier County Transportation Planning Staff. The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3 — Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour and is graphically depicted below - Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage. Table 3 — Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION MAP O By PIMRCENTAOt A � PP - LOCATICN �3 0. II Z �♦ ne Je;. 9 CC Distribution AUIR Roadway Link Roadway Link of Project Link Location Traffic ID # west of Collier US 41 94.0 40% Blvd. East of Collier U5 41 95.1 10% wvd. Collier Blvd. 35.0 North of US 41 30% Collier Blvd. 36A South of US 41 209 Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION MAP O By PIMRCENTAOt A � PP - LOCATICN �3 0. II Z �♦ ne Je;. 9 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS - April 2014 Site Access Turn Lane Analysis The site proposes to connect to US 41 via the existing main access - directional left -in/ right -in/ right -out. In order to limit side friction with US 41, interconnections with adjacent sites are provided. For details refer to Appendix B - Project Master Site Plan. Tamiami Trail East (US 41- SR 90) is under Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) jurisdiction and it is currently a six -lane two-way urban arterial roadway which has a posted legal speed limit of 45 mph in the vicinity of project. Based on FDOT Index 301 (design speed of 45mph), the minimum turn lane length is 185ft (which includes a 50ft taper) plus required queue. Existing conditions at US 41 and project access intersection show one EB directional left in, which is approximately 310ft long (that provides for storage of 125ft or 5 vehicles). Turn lane analyses were performed for the main project access. The projected turning movements are depicted in Appendix D - Turning Movement Exhibit. Main Site Access - Turn Lane Warrants The proposed project is expected to generate 150vph EB left turning movements and 17vph WB right turning movements, during the PM peak hour on Tamiami Trail East. Based on the turning volumes, a left turn is warranted based on volume criteria, and given relatively low right turn volume and constraint of the existing open swale, a right turn lane is not warranted for the main site access. Main Site Access - Plans Preparation Manual The minimum required storage length for the major street left -turn lane is calculated based on the number of vehicles expected to arrive during an average of two -minute period of the peak hour. As shown in The Plans Preparation Manual (PPM) - Vol. 1- page 2-88, a minimum queue length of 100 ft is provided. 10 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS — April 2014 Based on the 150vph in the PM peak hour, the directional left turn should have a minimum storage of 125 feet. Therefore, the existing 310 foot turn lane serving the project entrance will accommodate the operational needs of the project at build out for both deceleration and storage. Main Site Access — HCS Computer Modeling Software Left -in directional median turn lane analysis at main project access is calculated using the latest version of HCS computer modeling software (which emulates HCM 2010). The traffic data were obtained from "Project Traffic Technical Memorandum – US 41 & CR 951 Intersection Improvement" – prepared by Stanley Consultants, Inc. and issued on September 2010. Thru traffic movements for Tamiami Trail East were extracted for the Opening Year (2015) and Interim Year (2025). Please note that per approved Methodology Meeting with Collier County, the project build- out year was established for 2019 (refer to Appendix A). Excerpts from US 41 & CR 951 intersection study – Alternative 3, are included in Appendix F. HCS data calculations – for AM – PM peak hour for Opening Year and Interim Year – are included in Appendix E – HCS Printouts, and show recommended queues. The HCS -V 6.50 results show that the site access intersection is projected to exhibit a LOS "C" for the PM peak hour in the Opening Year 2015 background and total project traffic. In addition, the analysis finds that future overall traffic operations to be satisfactory (LOS "W) during Interim Year 2025 with projected traffic. Based on the HCS results the EB left turn lane should provide a minimum total length of 260 feet (to include a minimum of 50ft queue storage) to accommodate Interim Year 2025 background and total proposed project traffic. Stacking – US -41 and CR -951 Intersection The intersection of US -41 and CR -951 is a major signalized intersection. 11 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 As illustrated in Appendix E, WB thru vehicle stacking was calculated based on PPM formula — for signalized intersection — Vol I Page 7-26, for the 2015 Opening Year and 2025 Interim Year, to show possible interference with the left -in directional turning movements. Based on our calculations, a maximum of 750 feet long stacking is needed under the signalized intersection highest impacted scenario — 2025 AM peak hour background with project traffic. The existing WB thru lane is approximately 845 feet long (to reach the left -in directional). Improvement Analysis — Conclusions Based on this traffic impact report, the existing eastbound left -in directional serving the project entrance will accommodate the operational needs of the project at 2015 Opening Year, for both deceleration and storage. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project. 12 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS — April 2014 Appendix A: Collier County — Approved Initial Meeting Checklist 5 Sheets 13 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 INFIJAL MLI• rjNc CHECKLIST Suggestiun: Use this Appendix na a workshert to cnsurr that no irnportnnt elements are overlooked. •Crofts out the items that do not npply, or NIA tout upplicah1rl. Dale: (ktuher l6. 2413 Timet INA Location: Vias Ernai People Attending: Name. Ikganization. and Telephone Numbers 1), Johni u l��cr►►'itg kv. 'C GroAlh Mknit Div 2) vlorman 'I rrhilcctck IQS 3),, P rias MAlaojw,'DC Slade Preparer; Prepam's Name and Title2 No; nsatt_7rr liitt�k._Alf:i', }'l.. ❑rganizatiun: Trpbiicack Consulting, Solutions. PA Addrtms, R 'Telephone Muttber. IZQ5 Piper Boulevard SIlite 202 Naples. F1 34114 1 '39-io_- -9 11 �iEvi�wgrlx]• Revie►ver's Numc & Ville: ►#ohm Podczen istskw-, Em [91 0M=4= Col i g .'Miggy 7 ri a mian Plgm istg Department Organization & Telephunc Ntjrnher: 239-252-3890 Applicant. Aplalicttsrt'g Namc..CaC jImpertics. LLC Address: 5715 lllu oty-n Road, Suite 200, Clearwater r•I 37 g[ Tclephone Minihm 727.446.3444 Pr used Devcla meat: Name: 13245 Trail l=A41—Conditional l.gse [Ax:ation: Namh of US 41 and east of Collie Illvd_ Ladd Use Type: Shop in C enter 11T Codc 4: 824 Other. Description: Proposed Dtvelopumu Conditions - 44,5Otis I }rags l of� 14 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS — April 2014 Zoning Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation: No change Requested: To aliuw 44,5{I0sfsl opping eentfir.. Findings of the Preliminary Study: BW, -d a tri a. ven_eratinn resvIL& the new proicm %011 grTmaratr more than 100 trip_end s ONHT-19tjae PhA 1'k 1fir. Study 'I'vne:_ Jif nos net inereaae, operational study) Sing]. Sole T15 ❑ Minor i 1S ❑ Magor TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Adlacc_nlSteens:1;ti_41___ kIliu1JtM. Additional intersections to be analyzed: N/A Project Build Out:-IUT8- 2ts�n I'iunning Horizon Yewls): !g 20 0i Anulysis Time Peflod(s):.PM IIKI Future Off -Site rAwelopments: min. 2% s mmI]i rate Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITL 9" Edition Reductions inPrin GenevaSinn Bates: None: WA Pass -by trips: max. 25% PM, max. 15% Daily. Internal trips (PUD): N/A Transit use: N/A Other: N/A Hurizoa Year Road" av NOwork Irnprnvrmcnis, 21118 Mathodoiolty & Assumpliu>xs: Non -site traffic estimates:", 9013 ALJIR Site -trip generation: 1'11 9 T:dgnnn. 1,LIC M Trip distribution method: -t incrr s Esk'In tc - refer to Fig. 1 Turning Movements: E',wincer's Estimate -_refer to Fit. 2 Site access analysis: I access point lo US41 Traffic assignment method. nroicct Iripseago Kn ruk un m►► l Traffic growth rate: historic rowlh.rarc or 2'l„ gggirs M Page 2 of 5 15 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Fig 1- Project Trip Distribution PROTECT TR'P * QfBT1"ITION MAP BY PFRCENTA6E 1p r,..�(//`/ LacATior: 1 Fig 2- Project Turning Movements emu ! L 1� f �f 8 Page 3 of 5 16 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 tint tial F ca t u rrs: (from preliminarystudy or prior experience) Accidents locations: N/A Sight distance: N/A Queuing: N/A Access location & configuration: N/A Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system location & progression needs:/A/A On-site parking needs: Per CC f -DC Data Sources: ITE Trip Gen.; !lC 2013AUTR, CC Traffic Cuunis Base maps: N/A - - - -- Prior study reports: N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: N/A Review process: N/A Requirements: NIA Miscellaneous: N/A Small Scale Study -1•!n Fee Minor Study - $750.00 1N { Gyt'�,� TO ;;. E -L- Major Study - �l iElRl, ti 151 y.[] of i r( "j . Includes 2 t. 111r,ISn1- r,vC- I,p Additional Intersections - $500.00 each All fees K-lll be agreed m during lire Methodology meeting and must be puld to Transportation prior ro our sign -off on the applicariorr. SIGNATURES N8Ymao, TYeUL&DOe V ► ' Study PremNu s--1-ic ili•r'rA vicwcr{s] Applicant 17 Page 4 of 5 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS — April 2014 Collier Coaniv Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review. Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees fir additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodology Iteylew - S50fl F Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution. assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Slud-v" determination, written approval/commnients on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re -submitted. amended methodology statement. and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. "Small Scale Sludv" Review - No Additional Fee Otieludv,% one suffrcienev revinvI Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation, distribution and maximum threshold compliance, "'Min(or 81u41 Rpvimy" -17H Fee ttncIudrs 1)ne_xultleienry revlt•►v Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site. confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concun-ency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off-site improvements within the right-of-way. review of site access and circulation. and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/questions. "Major StudyReview" - 51.500 F'eeflneludcs hyn intemerifiru_nnulytr]ltt_rnd Into stiMulencE revir-Ws Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment. concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traflie volume data eel lectedlassembled, review of traffic growth analysis, review of off-site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of "sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review" - $500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the "Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "Major Study Review" "AddIIionnl Sufrrclerrn• Reviews" - S5011 Fee} Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion ofthe review. Page 5 of 5 18 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Appendix B: Project Master Concept Plan 2 Sheets 19 TV O .MAC •eA i' S one Illi 1�1a J _ I N �� N !� f 11� - B ONL —Sir, _ r F � ! mmrw µasA FPL - uFtNe ■~ �� a� f 7.2w Sl. �2m Dl. '� �: W=V FIX. - 10.0 ass - Fina �L �.. _� Kir I;_ TAMIAMI TRAIL E / US HWY 41 SOUTH -XIc11V_ ,-. LCNN-- _Nx+WL 15 TYPE 7LANDSCAPE' BUFFER WRWH WALL DUSTING PIM FANG WATERS BEACH RESORT )M. M48) Lx r+rs r ww�a ww.—i ww ww wm=-s-a■B w In w w wIw yw asw j W REAR YARD SETBACK _ ZONING NOTTO E AMMAIMPRESERVE 7BBAC: r ijll`! NOT TO BE WUMANmAS LANDSCAPE l: WATERAOEAENT ARE A PROPERTY' p AREBOUNDARY—/ ICV UNRS) I F f wNCEPTwL - _ CONGEPMAL BNLDRIG - �u21 ■l LDING BUILDING •15.0008F �9-0G SF i ■ � 11AMSF t •9A00 SF i I � -N n 2r MMIPFIDCAL rl, �- - - iw w w w w w -w w.T w w w --I== m w will? w4 'FFIOHTVARO BET9AGIL w w 10 TYPE TY LANDSCAPE BUFFER MTYPE 9' . LANDSCAPE BUFFER TAMIAMI TRAIL E / US HWY 41 SOUTH THE E7CLSTTNO l E.�.IH AT YME FKifl{.'T i7RtiEWAr t3 000�EA THP CONTROL OF FDOT. ANY HODIFrA JCR- OR,MAMA' OF ANY -.. UEULAN OPENING SMANG THIS ,FIE # AT TM MlE OF FDOTAND IB MDT ARIGHT OF ACCESS FOR TNI88TTE 1 - 3 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations 1 Sheet 22 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Project Name: 13254 Troll East -Zonng 13254 TRAIL EAST No: Data; I Date: 111112013 0 City: 0 0 Zip/Postal Code: State/Province: Country: 4`_' ZlpfPostal Code Analyst's Name: 167 Country: Edition: 9th Client Name: 0 4d Dty Analyst's Name: Land Use 125 Edition: 9th Exit Entry Entry Deily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size 2006 59 36 Reduclion ` Entry Exit Entry 1 Exit Entry i Exit 720 -Medical-0entel Office 36 (') 651 650 68 18 32 84 Building Pass -Dy 301 301 15 Reduction 9 65 65 0 0 3 8 Inlemal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 0 586 585 68 18 29 76 932 -High-Turnover (Sit- 6 n) 382 381 36 29 35 24 Down) Restaurant 301 15 9 Total Non-gaseby Reduction 1705 38 38 0 0 3 2 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 13 9 Non -pass -by 344 343 36 29 19 13 934 -Fastfood Restaurant with Drive- 3 51') 868 868 81 78 59 55 Through Window Reduction 87 87 0 0 6 5 Intemal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 26 26 Nori-pass-by 761 781 81 78 27 24 912 -Drive -In Bank 6 0) 445 444 41 31 73 73 Reduction 44 44 0 0 7 7 Intemal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 31 31 Non -pass -by 401 400 1 41 31 35 35 'Total 2346 2343 226 156 199 236 Total Reduction 234 234 0 0 19 22 Total Internal 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Total Non -pace -0y 1 21112 1 2109 226 156 110 148 (1) 1000 Sq Feel Gross Floor Arse Project Name: 13254 TRAIL EAST No: Data; 914/2013 City; 0 State/Province: 0 0 Zip/Postal Code: 0 Country: 4`_' Client Name: Analyst's Name: 167 Edition: 9th 0 0 4d Dty Pk Hr Land Use 125 Slze l Entry Exit Entry Entry Exit 620 -Shopping Center 44 5 rrr i 2006 2006 59 36 Reduclion 0 0 O 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 Pass -Dy 301 301 15 9 Non -pass -by 1705 1705 44 27 Total 7006 2006 59 36 Total Rrdt1[llan 0 0 0 0 Total Intemal 0 0 0 0 Total Paaa4ly 301 301 15 9 Total Non-gaseby 1 j 1705 f 1705 44 _ I _ 27 (t) 1000So Feel Gross Leasable Area 23 PM Pk Hr Entry Exit 167 181 0 0 0 0 42 4`_' 125 136 167 181 0 0 0 0 42 45 125 136 ' 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits 2 Sheets 24 '! TAMIAMI TRAIL E ENTER 4E/o COLLIER' BLVD. EXIT 30°k a, e EXIT 40% EXIT 20% ,,•: EXIT 10% r~ a' a J4 +4 ++ 4.+ ENTER 2Q°Ia EXIT 20°!0 � ENTER 20°I° •• - COLLIER BLVD. t:. EIti'TEP.90°/� N PROJECT TURNING MOVEMBiTS BY PERCENTAt3E I PROJECT I J ACCESS NTER 9 d°!e EXIT 13°Ifl� N 01 TAMIAMI TRAIL, E IT �M— 73 ENTER PM= 67 ENTER - PM= 33 1=XIT - PM= 36 COLLIER BLVD, EIS TER - PM= 50 EXIT - PM= 54 EXIT - PM= 73 EXIT - PM= 3( ENTER - PM= 33 COLLIE I3f.VD, PROJECT TURNING MOVEMENTS BY PM PEAK HOUR PROJECTED TRIPS PM - ENTER- 167: EXIT= 1E1 y'+a� E7C1 i PROJECT M= 181 ACCESS �----7 ENTER - PM ENTER ( ., . PM=1 150 ENTER ' IV IPM: 17 EXIT - PM= 18 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS — April 2014 Appendix E: HCS Printouts 7 Sheets 27 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 U5 41— Mein Entrance Driveway — Unsixnelixed Intersection Due to software limitations and per correspondence with HCS support staff, adjustments to entered data have been applied. Tamiami Trail East was coded with 2 lanes by using a coefficient - 0.67 (reducing thru traffic by one third). Major Street — Tamiami Trail East— WB -EB; Minor Street— Project Driveway— NB -SB. Thru traffic volumes — Synchro 7 data provided in "US 41 & CR 951 Intersection Improvement FPID 428147-1-58-01, Collier County Project No. 60116" — September 2010, prepared by Stanley Consultants, Inc. Opening Year — 2015 Background — with Pro lect Traffic PJ Drive — SB RT AM = 36vph; PM=181vph US 41— EB Thru AM = 0.67(145+732+777) = 1,109vph; PM = 0.67(210+705+926) = 1,234vph US 41— EB LT AM = 53vph; PM = 150vph US 41— WB Thru AM = 0.67(116+845+509) = 985vph; PM = 0.67(181+797+471) = 971vph US 41— WB RT AM = 6vph; PM = 17vph Inte rim Year _ 2025 Back round — with Pra ect Traffic PJ Drive — SB RT AM = 36vph; PM = 181vph US 41— EB Thru AM = 0.67(210+1,068+ 852) = 1,427vph; PM = 0.67(260+1,140+1,030) = 1,628vph US 41— EB LT AM = 53vph; PM = 150vph US 41—WB Thru AM = 0.67(353+1,349+805) = 1,680vph; PM = 0.67(410+1,117+837) =1,584vph US 41— WB RT AM = 6vph; PM = 17vph 28 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 HCS — y 6.50 — SUMMARY RESULTS U5 42 — EB Directional Med lan — Left Turn -- existinx 31 Oft PM 2015 Background — with Project Traffic Approach - LOS - C; Delay —15.5 s/veh; 95% Queue Length = 1.05veh = 2veh — 50ft PM 2025 Background —with Project Traffic Approach - LOS - D; Delay — 29.2 s/veh; 95% Queue Length = 2.49veh = 3veh — 75ft The HCM delay was used to determine LOS, ranging from LOS A to F using delay ranges listed in Table 1. At unsignalized intersections (coded by HCS+ as two-way stop - controlled intersections), the average delay of the worst approach was used to determine the worst approach LOS. Table 1 KM.1 esod Level of Seance and Dar(iv Ra < 10.0 mus < 10.0 >10.0to<20.0 >10.O10< 150 B >20.Ob<35.0 >150<250 >35.0to<55.0 >250to<35.0 D >55.0to<80.0 >350to<50.0 E > 80 0 Sun'. W102010 > 50 0 F Queue lengths are 951" percentile queues, which represent a condition that is exceeded only five percent of the time. 49 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS — April 2014 U5 41— CR 951— Sf nelized Intersection — WB Thru Vehicle 5tackin WB Thru — stacking provided 845ft Assumptions: lveh = 25ft; WB Thru — 3 lanes; Signal cycle = 120s — as reflected in Appendix F; N - 30 Q = 2.OxDHVx25/ N - storage AM — PM 2015 US 41—WB Thru AM = 845vph; PM = 797vph AM stacking = 2.Ox 845x 25/(30x3) = 470ft PM stacking = 2.Ox 797x 25/(30x3) = 443ft AM — PM 2025 US 41—WB Thru AM = 1,349vph; PM = 1,117vph AM stacking = 2.Ox 1,349x 25/(30x3) = 750ft PM stacking = 2.Ox 1,117x 25/(30x3) = 621ft W1 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: EB WB Northbound Southbound Agency/Co.: TCS 1 4 f 7 8 9 f 10 11 12 Date Performed: 02/16/2014 L f f R Analysis Time Period: AM 58 40 Intersection: Directional -2015 BKGR W/ PJ 630 Jurisdiction: v/c 0.09 Units: U. S. Customary 958 queue length 0.30 Analysis Year: Control Delay 11.3 Project ID: 13245 TRAIL EAST LOS B East/West Street: TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST Approach Delay 12.3 North/South Street: PJ DRIVE Approach LOS B Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Volumes and Adjustments _ ________ _Vehicle Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 53 1109 985 — 6 Y Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 58 1232 1094 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided 1 RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street; Approach Northbound .� Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 36 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (B) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage l Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Servir= Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 f 7 8 9 f 10 11 12 Lane Config L f f R V (vph) 58 40 C(m) (vph) 630 535 v/c 0.09 0.07 958 queue length 0.30 0.24 Control Delay 11.3 12.3 LOS B B Approach Delay 12.3 Approach LOS B 31 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: TCS Date Performed: 02/18/2014 Analysis Time Period: PM Intersection: Directional -2015 BKGR W/ PJ Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Project ID: 13245 TRAIL EAST East/West Street: TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST North/South Street: PJ DRIVE Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 150 1234 971 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 166 1371 1078 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided r RT Channelized? Exists?/Storage No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L T R I L T R Volume _ 181 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 201 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 Configuration _ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service_____ Approach^ EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L R v (vph) 166 201 C(m) (vph) 633 541 v/c 0.26 0.37 958 queue length 1.05 1.71 Control Delay 12.7 15.5 LOS B C Approach Delay 15.5 Approach LOS C 32 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS — April 2014 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: TCS Date Performed: 02/16/2014 Analysis Time Period: AM Intersection: Directional -2025 BKGR W/ PJ Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Project ID: 13245 TRAIL EAST East/West Street: TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST North/South Street: PJ DRIVE Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume —3 1427 1680 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 58 1585 1866 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 36 - Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (B) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage I Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 1 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 i R v (vph) 58 — 40 C (m) (vph) 316 a 321 V/c 0.18 0.12 95% queue length 0.66 0.42 Control Delay 18.8 17.8 LOS C C Approach Delay 17.8 Approach LOS C 33 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS — April 2014 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Northbound Southbound Agency/Co.: TCS Movement 7 8 9 Date Performed: 02/18/2014 L Analysis Time Period: PM I L T R Volume Intersection: Directional -2025 BKGR W/ PJ Jurisdiction: Peak Hour Factor, PHF Units: U. S. Customary Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Analysis Year: 201 Percent Heavy Vehicles Project ID: 13245 TRAIL EAST 2 East/West Street: TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST 0 0 North/South Street: PJ DRIVE Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Delay, Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 150 1-6 2 8 Movement 1 1584 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 12 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 166 1808 1760 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided RT Channelized? v/c 0.48 No Lanes 1 2 0.56 2 1 Configuration L T T R Control Delay 24.6 Upstream Signal? No No 29.2 Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ) 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 201 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ _ Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 ) 10 11 12 Lane Config L R v (vph) 166 201 C(m) (vph) 346 344 v/c 0.48 0.56 958 queue length 2.49 3.52 Control Delay 24.6 29.2 LOS C D Approach Delay 29.2 Approach LOS D 34 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April, 2014 Appendix F: Excerpts from "Project Traffic Technical Memorandum — US 41 & CR 951— Intersection Improvement, September 2010," prepared by Stanley Consultants, Inc. 5 Sheets 35 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Section 5: Traffic Volume Projections 5.1 Methodology The actual 2010 traffic count data and 2009 FDOT link volumes were used as base year traffic which was then projected to existing year (2010), opening year (2015), interim year (2025) and design year (2035). Forecasted link- volumes weree then calculated by applying growth rates and compounded exponentially. 5.2 Developed Link AADT The MOT approved growth rales were used to develop the annual average daily traffic (AADT) voltunes. Using the AADT from 2009 FDOT as base year, the AADT from 2010, 2015, 2025 and 2035 was then calculated using compounded exponential growth formula as shown below: AADT, =AADTs *(1 +r)` Where, AADT,=AADTfor the Year of Consideration AADT, =AADT for the Base Year r=Traffic Growth Rate o = Ntmlber of years from the Base Year Projected future link volumes for specific years can be seen in Table 5.1. 7 n61r 5.t NPICdU11 141turr VAmies t'slnc Auurured t;rimth Hnit,% YN► CR 951 north of US -41 US -41 sort of 58 953 US -41 west of SR 953 Cat 951 south of M-41 2009 25226 10700 27500 30000 241111 25655 11299 28160 30555 2015 27911 14838 27500 33488 21x15 33036 25566 40191 40225 2035 1 39101 44121 SD949 48318 10 36 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS - April 2014 alta 2015 am 1: US -41 & CR -951 10/4/2010 -11 -• --v 4- 4- 4\ t/W 1* l ./ *Mild _ - =.rte _Eva > �>� . _WfiT _:WBR . -MOL;1YBi-- .118R -W _ BAt �P. Lane Codiguratiens 14 +++ re 1) +++ re IRS +++ r 144 W r Vdume MM) 146 732 777 116 US 609 862 921 98 600 949 166 Ideal flow (orphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1950 1900 1900 1950 1900 1900 TOM Losttlne (s) 4.0 4.0 65 4.0 4.0 65 4.0 4.0 6.6 4A 4.0 25 Lane Uld. Factor 097 091 0.88 097 0.91 OSS 094 091 100 0.94 0.91 100 At 1.00 1.00 OAS 1.00 1.00 OAS 100 1.00 OAS 1.00 1.00 0.86 Fit Protected 0.95 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 100 1.00 0.96 1.00 100 Sold. Flow (pyd) 3433 6085 2787 3433 6086 2787 6122 6086 1683 6122 6086 1683 FI Permitted 095 1.00 100 095 100 1.00 095 100 100 095 1.00 100 Bald Flow(pmr) 3433 5066 2707 3433 SASS 2787 6122 6015 1683 5122 6055 1663 Peak -how factor, PW 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 090 090 0.90 0.90 0.90 P4. How (oph) 161 813 863 129 939 666 968 1023 109 666 1064 183 RTOR Reduction (uph) 0 0 22 0 0 39 0 0 69 0 0 0 Lane Grog Fbu My q M 913 8.11 129 939 627 968 1023 40 666 1054 183 Tum Type Prot pl+ov Prot pt•ov Prot Perm Prot Free Protected Phases 7 4 46 3 8 81 6 2 1 6 Permilled Phases 2 Free Actuated Green, 0 0) 8.6 27.7 61.7 8.3 27.4 60.4 28.6 44.6 445 175 335 120.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.1 292 617 9.8 28.9 50.4 30.0 46.0 44.5 19.0 35.0 120.0 Actusted WC Relb 0.08 0.24 0.61 0.08 024 0.42 026 0.31 0.37 0.16 029 1.00 Clearance Time 0) 65 6$ 5.6 65 6.6 66 65 6.5 6S Vehicle ENenslon (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (.ph) 289 1237 1433 280 1226 1171 1281 1949 687 811 1483 1683 tots Kalb Prot c0.06 0.16 020 0.04 cO 18 0.19 cO.19 020 011 c021 vh Rano Perm 0.03 cO 12 tot Ratio 056 0.66 0.59 OAS 0.77 OAS 0.76 052 0.07 0.69 0.71 0,12 Worm Delay, 61 62.8 409 20.3 626 42.4 24.9 41.6 28.6 24.4 47.7 38.0 0.0 Progression Faft 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 113 O$ 12 2.9 0.3 2,4 10 02 2.4 2.9 01 Delay 0) 661 422 209 63$ 45.3 262 439 29.6 24.6 60.1 40.9 01 Level of S"ce E D C D D C D C C D D A Approach Delay (s) 33,3 39.0 36.9 39.6 Approach LOS C D D D I8j[YrilGt!_8hn_m41ry HCM Average Cartrol Delay 36.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM VdumetoCapadyratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 1200 Sum of lost time (5) 120 Intersection Capacity UBlzatlon 60.1% ICU Level of Santa C Analyse Pedod Qnln) 16 c Critical lane Group Baseline Synchro7- Report Page 1 37 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS - April 2014 alt3_2015_pm 1: US -41 & CR -951 10!42010 LaneCortlguatiorns 14 fff Pi' 'i'I fff PP 'i'i`i +++ it 'i`i'i +?f P Vduhe Qrph) 210 706 926 181 797 471 1016 909 126 462 820 200 Ideal now (fphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1950 1900 1900 1950 1900 1900 Told lost Wo (s) 4.0 4.0 6.6 4.0 4.0 616 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.5 Lane Ulw.Factor 0.97 0.91 088 0.97 0.91 0.98 0.94 0.91 100 094 091 1.00 Fd 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.86 100 1.00 0.86 FN Protected 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Odd. Flow (pd) 3433 6086 2787 3433 60% 2787 6122 6086 1683 6122 6086 1683 F1 Permitted 0.96 100 100 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 100 095 1.00 100 SaW FlowOenm) 3433 6066 2717 343.1 6086 2797 _5122 6066 1683 6122 50[6 1683 Peak -how factor, P HF 0.90 090 090 090 0.90 0.90 090 090 0.90 090 0.90 090 A4. Row (0) 233 783 1029 201 886 623 1128 1010 139 613 911 222 RTOR Reduction oph) 0 0 17 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanita Gmlp Fl�w Wit) 233 703 10122 201 81W _183 1528 1010 i39 513 911 M Tun Type Prot pt+ov Prol pl+ov Prd Free PMI Free Protected Phases 7 4 46 3 8 81 6 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Free Free Acfuded Green, 0 (s) 11.1 267 63.7 9.4 26.0 46.6 31.6 46.8 120.0 16.1 30.4 120.0 Effective Green, g (s) 12.6 2$2 63.7 10.9 26.6 46.6 33.0 47.3 1200 17.6 31.9 120.0 Actuated gfC ROUD 0.10 0.24 0 63 0.09 022 0.39 028 0.39 1.00 0.16 027 1.00 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 65 66 U 6.6 6.6 6.6 U VaNde EAenslon (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 I- Grp cap(wph) 360 1195 1479 312 1123 1082 1409 2004 1683 761 1362 1683 %atzRalfoPlot c0.07 016 0.36 0.06 e0.17 0.17 c022 020 0.10 colt via Rdb Perm 0.09 c0.14 vR Rdlo 0.66 0.66 0.68 0.64 0.79 0.46 0.80 0.60 0.09 0.68 0.67 0.14 Worm Delay, d1 616 41.5 207 627 44.1 27.2 40.4 276 0.0 48.6 39.4 0.0 Prgresslon Fedor 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 alaemertd Delay, d2 4.0 1.3 13 4.5 3.8 0.3 3.4 09 0,1 26 2.7 0.2 Delay 0) 66.6 42.8 22.1 672 478 27.4 438 28.1 01 61.1 42.1 02 Level of Service E D C E D C D C A D D A Approach Delay (s) 33.8 42.4 34.3 392 Approach LOS C D C D Iter sub 61 ry HCM Average Control Delay 37.0 HCM level of Service D HCM VokmetoCapactyratb 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sun of lost time 0) 120 Intersection Capacity UlAzdlon 69.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysts Period Quin) 16 c Critical Lane Group Baseline Syrxlro 7 • Repml Page 1 38 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS - April 2014 alt3,_2025„am is US -41 & CR -051 logr2mo J-.� � '- t 4\ t r 1* 4 � I,lYn"M ESL EST EBR N'BL WRT 1YSR 110L NBT HBR SBL 807 SRR LaneCorrigrrations M fit re 11 +" W +Mf P `)) fit P Vdt ne M%) 210 1068 862 353 1349 806 936 996 300 790 1034 190 Ideal now "to) 1950 1950 1950 1960 1950 1960 1950 1960 1950 1950 1950 1950 Told test time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.5 4.0 CO 6b 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.5 Law Ufl Fads 0.97 0.91 0.88 097 091 0 88 094 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 100 Fd 1.00 1.00 086 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.86 Fit Protected 0.96 100 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (Trot) 3623 6219 2860 3623 6219 2860 6122 6219 1626 6122 6219 1625 Fit Permitted 0.95 100 100 095 100 1.00 095 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 100 Sold. Flow (parna) 3523 6219 2860 3623 6219 2$60 6122 5219 1626 6122 6219 1626 Peakftur factor, PW 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 090 0.90 0.90 090 0.90 A4. Row (0) 233 1187 947 392 1499 894 1040 1106 333 $78 1149 211 RTOR Redudlon (vph) 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Omup Flow Z 233 1187 941 392 1499 886 1040 1106 333 $7$ 1149 211 Tum Type Prot pt+ov Prot pt+ov Rot Free Prot Free Protected Phases 7 4 46 3 8 81 6 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, 0 0) 8.5 30.6 66.0 13.6 36.5 67.8 26.6 31.7 120.0 223 28.5 120.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 32.0 66.0 15.0 37.0 678 27.0 332 120.0 23.8 30.0 1200 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.08 027 0.47 0.12 0.31 0.48 022 02$ 1.00 020 026 1.00 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 5b 66 66 6.5 5b Vehicle ENerlslon (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 I- Grp Cap (,,ph) 294 1392 1335 440 1609 1378 1162 1444 1626 1016 1305 1626 vis Ratio Prot 0.07 cO23 023 0.11 cO29 031 cO20 021 0.17 cO22 vh Ratlo Perm 020 0.13 tat Retb 0.79 0.86 0.70 0.89 0.93 0.64 0.90 0.77 020 0.86 0.88 0.13 UNorm Delay, d1 54.0 41.8 26A 61.7 40.3 233 462 39.8 0.0 46.5 433 0.0 Progresdon Fedor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 13.6 53 1.7 19.7 102 10 9.9 39 03 79 8.7 02 Delay 0) 67.6 47.0 27.1 71A 60A 244 662 43A 03 643 62.0 02 Level of Sauce E D C E D C E D A D D A Approach Delay (s) 41.1 45.0 42.7 48.0 Approach LOS D D D D t`�Nt:pl►L91a1'f101>sy _ _ _ HCM Awrage Control Delay 442 HCM Level of Service D HCM VlolunetoCapactyratb 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sun o1 lost tune (s) 120 Intersection Capacty lllllzatlon 81.446 ICU level of Service D Analysis Period on In) 16 c Orifice! Lane Group Baseline Synchro7- Report Page t 39 13254 Trail East - Conditional Use - TIS - April 2014 M3_2025_pm 1: US -41 & CR -951 1014r2010 t -� t �► l 1iPleoi - Wj- NOR _1181,_ . B91•. SPR Lane Conligurations 'i'i f?+ ii' 11 W re IRS +++ P III +++ ? Volume M%) 260 1140 1030 410 1117 837 1011 977 368 723 946 210 Ideal Row MV) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1950 1900 1900 1950 1900 1900 Total Lod Ona(a) 4.0 4.0 6b 4.0 4.0 6.6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 25 Lane ud. Fador 097 091 0 88 0.97 091 0.88 094 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 100 Fd 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.86 F1 Protected 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.95 100 1.00 0.95 100 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 3433 6085 2787 3433 6086 2787 6122 6086 1683 6122 6086 1683 Fit Permdled 0.95 100 100 0.95 100 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 100 Said Flow Oerm) 3433 60th 2787 3433 605 2797 6122 6015 1613 5122 5W 1683 Peak -hour lector, PW 0.90 090 090 0.90 0.90 0.90 090 0.90 0.90 090 0.90 090 A4- Row (rph) 289 1267 1141 466 1241 930 1123 1086 398 803 1061 233 RTOR Reduction MA) 0 0 6 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Gioup Flow MA) 289 1267 1139 4% 1241 418 1123 1086 3% s03 1051 233 Tum Type Prot pt+ov Prol pl"v Prat Free Prot Free Protected Phases 7 4 46 3 8 81 6 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, 0 0) 11.6 29.6 60.9 16b 334 594 26,9 32b 120.0 20.6 27.1 120.0 Effective Green, g (s) 13.1 310 60.9 17.0 349 694 274 34.0 120.0 22.0 28.6 120.0 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.11 026 0b1 0.14 029 0.60 023 028 1.00 0.1E 024 1.00 Clearance Time 0) 5.5 6.5 66 66 66 5b 6.6 65 Vehicle EAenslon C_) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (kph) 375 1314 1414 486 1479 1380 1170 1441 1683 939 1212 1683 v/s Rabo Prd 0.08 c026 0.41 cOl3 024 033 c022 cO21 0.16 c021 %* Kalb Penn 025 0.16 vk Ratio 0.77 0.96 0.81 0.94 0.84 0.67 0.96 0.76 026 0.86 0.87 0.16 Worm Delay, dl 62.0 44.0 24.6 61.0 39.9 228 46.8 392 0.0 47.5 43.9 0.0 Progression Fedor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 94 16.9 3.6 25.9 4.4 12 173 3.7 0.4 7.7 8.6 0.2 Delay 0) 614 60.8 28.1 76.9 443 24.0 630 42.9 0.4 652 62A 02 Level of Service E E C E D C E D A E D A Approach Delay (s) 47.0 42.8 46.1 47.6 Approach LOS D D D D !'1111e00011911Y1 1p tfY HCM Average C4v4rd Delay 46.6 HCM Level d Service D HCM Vduoeto Capactyratio 0.90 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time a) 12 0 Intersection Capacity 11118tatlon 84.1% ICU Level d Service E Analysis Period QnIn) 16 c Oilcal Lane Group BaseBne Synchro 7- Repot Pagel 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 Appendix G: FDOT Comments - Responses 3 Sheets 41 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 1. Page 11 — The storage length calculation provided Is not correct. The storage should be calculated based upon the Plans Preparation Manual formula (PPM Volume 1 pg 7-26). Response: Storage length calculation has been provided consistent with FDOT Design Standards, Index 301 and Plan Preparation Manual - Volume 1 page 2-88 (Queue length for unsignalized intersection). The method shown in the repos: provided vehicle storage for the major street left turn lane based on the number of vehicles expected to arrive during an average two -minute period of the peak hour. Our analysis Is consistent with recommendations for unsignalized Intersections depicted in 'Florida Intersection Design Guide 2013 — FDOT — Geometric Design — Chapter 3.12.1— page 3-32. 2. Page 27 — Please provide the relevant correspondence with McTrans Staff justifying the 0.67 factor. The current version of the Highway Capacity Software, HCS2010, allows the analysis of a major street approach with three thru lanes plus dedicated turning lanes without the use of a factor. ReWous e: HCS 2010 has not yet been updated to handle three lanes on the major street. Please refer to Fig. 1 on the next page, for relevant correspondence with McTrans. 42 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 13245 Trail East — TIS - Comments — Responses — February 2014 Fig. l — McTrans Correspondence Oil' mS-pi.•E.47ull ssw Inu Anl7.d)nn5(6m, Te faluu MYN vu <rmtuN rfl�rnbkul Wn H ono., ILS�W phafrM yes been igfdsled to �rtaenf.N Ue pwnded lCMtem neeenwNln Yar.3e Nrcelarw en H.e mrywfrvrt We bele leraw lh.l rwrdyln d�4nEJion 111f fWmy I•, thnmsa9nm5 y--, rods"", Ino'uu: W 41 mqW V-11nd<egball.[by —AW ly m.Ih.d, toipl r Nwr-b'ei,A-Ar,NU!inu.> fr ,rpt Khl — v—d— Tm—n lel the inwmen.nn the dat'.In U,e solMsronnlef W.Nel.lmllarowdl tan help jus Mr'n.M w.ylm�rd iNOrq ycul ai-ryfn rnmpitted to yow s,.UftsrlCn row 11. r4 , 2" Clprian MeI---u c emiiiaescuaIlebfl000k btz> Mon, Feb 17 2014 .1 11 16 AM To BIII Semp.on <bsarnpsonaufl edu> H Bir I'm using the HCS 2010• Verson 6 50 Ju.l wai*e of 10 Conium Ilial rogyKirlp Ifi ltic by one third on a 3 -lane major street, is Will the way to go for an uneignellzed tnlerips ohon (code It with arlea two Thank you Clrxmn On Thu, Jan 17 2()13 at a 06 AM &II Samp-ori _wan.r.vcnys`_Tu11 rd— wrote 'oma •,.1 236$664W,63 - Fax Bill Sampson s bsompeonCgull edu> Mon Feb 17 2014 at 11 32 AM To Clprran Malaetfcu ocma'aeacuClrebllcock br- 111 cipnan, Yes, still not updated - sorry fol the delay 1 hanks, 0111 43 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use — TIS — April 2014 13245 Troll East - TIS - Comments - Responses — February 2014 3. Page 27 - The thru volumes on US 41 at the directional access driveway are not calculated correctly. For example, the 2015 AM peak hour westbound thru volume should be calculated as follows: WBT = 0.67 x (145+732+777) = 1,108 veh. Resrranse. TIS report has been revised as requested. Please refer to Appendix E: HCS Printouts for updated approach volumes. 4. Page 29 - The PPM formula referenced in comment 111 should be utillzed to estimate the queuing at the US 41/SR 951 traffic signal. It appears that a modified version of the red time formula was utilized, which is not valid in this case since several movements on the westbound approach operate with a V/C > 1.0. Response: TIS report has been revised as requested. The current Highway Capacity Manuel (HCM) analysis procedure for signalized intersection operations does not explicitly account for left -turn bay spillover, thus, the assumption is that the through movement is unimpeded during the green phase of the through movement. As shown In Florida Intersection Design Guide 2013" FDOT - page 3-32 - at signalized intersections the required storage length depends on the signal cycle length, the signal phasing arrangement and the rate of arrivals and departures of fuming vehicles. The storage length is a function of the probability of occurrence of events and it is based on 1.5 to 2 times the average number of vehicles that would store per cycle, which is predicted on the design volume. It is our recommendation to use a 1.5 safety factor in calculating WB Thru vehicle stacking. 44 JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT For STOR-ALL (Tamiami Trail East, Collier County, Florida) May 9, 2018 September 4, 2018 CounfE TIS Review Fees James TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Small -Scale Study) Review Fee = $0.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, IN 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 19 Ba n ks Digitally signed by James M. Banks Date: 2018.09.04 15:18:24 -04'00' CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 27630 I1ItIfIli,��'I'.r BAIV (PROJECT NO. 18031 1) ,GEniS� �Ao , X 0 / JAM M. F3aMlll� `P E.Alt7- ` FL bA�� O TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Methodology 2 Scope of Project 3 Table A - Approved Land Uses vs. Proposed Land Use 3 Figure 1 3.1 Site Plan 3.2 Project Generated Traffic 4 Table B - New Site -Generated Trips 4 Previously Approved Site -Generated Trips 4 Table 1- Trip Generation Computations 4.1 Table 2B (Excerpt from 13254 TIS, prepared by Trebilcock) 4.2 Existing + Committed Road Network 5 Project Traffic Distribution 5 Area of Significant Impact 5 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 5.1 Table 2A - Area of Impact/Road Classification 5.2 2017 thru 2020 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 6 Table 2B - 2017 & 2020 Link Volumes 6.1 Table 2C - 2020 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 6.2 1 Conclusions The proposed zoning amendment is to include self -storage land use on lots 1 & 2 within the previously approved conditional use project known as 13245 Trail East, which is located within the northeast quadrant of C.R. 951 and Tamiami Trail East. Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the proposed zoning amendment to include self -storage land use within 13245 Trail East will not have a negative impact upon the surrounding road network. Furthermore, if the zoning amendment is approved and self storage is developed, then the potential to develop 14,000 square feet of more intense retail, fast food, high -turnover restaurant or medical office space will be displaced. More specifically, 13245 Trail East was previously approved for the development of 44,500 square feet of mixed-use commercial that was expected to generate a total of 261 new PM peak hour trips. The displacement of 14,000 s.f. of commercial use on lots 1 $& 2 (results in 82 fewer trips) and the inclusion of self - storage (adds 16 trips) will result in a reduction of total site -generated trips of 195 new PM peak hour trips (66 fewer trips). Therefore, the proposed zoning amendment will result in less site -generated trips if the self storage use is developed. It was verified that all roads, within the project's area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the proposed self - storage land use. As determined, the road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for 2020 project build -out conditions and will not create any off-site transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. Methodology On April 2, 2018, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department for review as part of a SDP application. The approved methodology is also being used as the foundation for preparing the zoning application TIS. The $500.00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the zoning request. The TIS methodology was reviewed by staff and a copy of the approved methodology is provided in the appendix (refer to pages M1 thru M10). 2 Scope of Project Stor-All is a proposed self -storage facility that will be located on Lots 1 & 2 within the previously approved conditional use project known as 13245 Trail East, which is located within the northeast quadrant of C.R. 951 and Tamiami Trail East. 13245 Trail East was approved for the development of 44,500 square feet of mixed-use commercial space. If the proposed zoning amendment is approved and developed, then the self -storage would displace the potential to develop approximately 14,000 square feet of commercial space on lots 1 & 2. The site will have access to the adjacent road network via previously approved points of shared ingress/egress to Tamiami Trail. The access points were previously designed and have or will be constructed based upon project build -out traffic demands associated with the subject site and the adjacent parcels. Table A Annroved Land Uses vs. Proposed Land Use 13245 Trail East Approved Land Use Proposed Land Use Retail Self -Storage Lots 1 &2 (14,000 s.f.) (95,300 s.f.) No Change Retail Lots 3 thru 5 (30,500 s.£) ! Rattlesnake Hammock —1-- — ----------- � I m ' gl 01 GS Af 17� Price Street` m A. a w ` �f fill E; I Henderson Creek Tower Road ` —C:1 Manatee Road J LEGEND 6—LANE ARTERIAL 4—LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — — — 2—LANE ARTERIAL 2—LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD — NORTH N.T.S. JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. STAR -ALL 8, 2018 3. Project Location & Roadway Classification FIGURE 1 SCOPE �l\ OF NpRIL •' D-\Drcpk...V.Ii. Pardo and tisc.'I jP 2017\20L703\Cupt—,PN5 � frolLY IkMLDY�G Kana�r.atr. C i SITE PLAN ~ br ..wc +pLSGatt RE .,pow dr�� ..war ~ F � y �► y I LdQ Zo. o 0 0 L€ O V) a -w Oa CLQ CL. z Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers., Trip Generation Manual, 10`x' Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was determined that land use code "Mini - Warehouse" (LUC 15 1) was most representative of the proposed use. As determined, the project will generate 144 daily trips and 10 vph and 16 vph new trips during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Table 1 depicts the computations performed in determining the project's new trips. Table B provides a summary of the trip generation computation results that are shown in Table 1. Table B New Site -Generated Trips (Summation ofTable 1) Daily Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips Generated Trips Generated Trips Generated (ADT) { h) (yph) 144 10 16 Previously Approved Site -Generated Trips The conditional use project known as 13245 Trail East was previously approved for the development of 44,500 square feet of mixed-use commercial that was expected to generate a total of 261 new PM peak hour trips. For details regarding previously approved trips for 13245 Trail East, refer to page 4.2 which is an excerpt from the project's TIS, prepared by Trebilcock. It is estimated that the displacement of 14,000 s.f of commercial use (results in 82 fewer trips) and inclusion of self -storage (adds 16 trips) will result in a reduction in the total site -generated trips of 195 new PM peak hour trips (66 fewer trips). Therefore, the proposed zoning amendment will result in less site - generated trips if the self storage use is developed. 4 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS STOR-ALL Code Land Use Description Maximum Build Schedule 151 Mini -Warehouse 95,300 s.f. Code Trip Trip Generation E uation T0ta1 Trips LUC 151 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T =1.51(X) = 144 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.10(X) = 30 vph 60% Enter/ 40% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.17(X) = 16 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = 4.1 Trips Enter/Exit 6 / 4 8 / 8 13254 Trail East — Conditional Use -- TIS — April 2014 CfKdAlge v by rP-E81,, c Oc k) Table 2A — Trip Generation — Current Zoning Conditions — Average Weekday Development Daily Two -Way Volume PM Peak Hour Use Sita Enter Exit Total _Land LUC 932 - High Turnover (sit -Down) Restaurant 6,000sf 763 35 24 59 LUC 912 - Drive-in.Bank 6,000sf 889 73 32 73 146 LUC 720 - Medlcal-Dental Office Building 36,000sf 1,301 84 116 LUC 934 - Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive Through Window 3,500sf 1,736 59 55 114 Total Driveway Internal Capture* - — 51,500sf 4,689 199 236 435 -19 -22 -41 Total External 180 214 394 Pass -By Trips" -70 -66 -136 Total to adjacent streets 110 148 258 Notes:* Internal Capture —10% for all land uses; ** Pass -By Trips —40% High Turnover Restaurant; 47% Drive-in Bank; 50% Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window. Table 213 — Trip Generation — Proposed Rezone Conditions — Average Weekday Development Daily Two -Way Volume PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Enter Exit Total LUC 820 Shopping Center 44,500sf*** 4,012 167 181 348 Total Driveway 4,012 1.67 181 348 Internal Capture* N/A N/A N/A Total External 167 181 348 Pass -By Trips** -42 -45 8 Total to adjacent streets 125 136 261 Notes:* Internal Capture — N/A, accounted for inherently in mixed land use; ** Pass -By up to 25% for Shopping Center; ***35,000 sf is within the subject CU parcel and 9,500 sf i within the adjacent parcel under the same ownership. Refer to Appendix B. Existing + Committed Road Network Figure 1 and Table 2A provide a detail of the surrounding E + C road network. Table 2A also shows the roads' respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. As shown, there are no significant 5 -year committed roadway improvements within the project's area of impact. Project Traffic Distribution The project's traffic was distributed to the surrounding road network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area, and the location of competing business types and surrounding residential areas. Figure 2 and Table 2A provide a detail of the traffic distributions based on a percentage basis and by volume. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2A describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the projects area of impact are identified in Table 2A. SI TABLE 2A PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 8 Entering Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 8 Exiting LOS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non -PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant Class LOS (vphpd) % Dist. (vphpd) Pk Dir v )hj, DiR Standard Im act Impact 35.0 County Road 951 Rattlesnake to Tamiami Trail 6D E 3200 25.0% 2 N 2 S 2% 0.06% NO 36.1 Tamiami Trail to Wal-Mart 61) D 2500 20.0% 2 N 2 S 2% 0.06% NO 94.0 E. Tamiami Trail Triangle to C.R. 951 95.1.a C.R. 951 to Site 95.1.b Site to Joseph Lane Lrl N 6D E 3000 35% 3 E 3 w 2% 0.09% NO 6D D 3100 70% 6 E 6 w 2% 0.18% NO 6D D 3100 30% 2 w 2 E 2% 0.08% NO 2017 thru 2020 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2017 thru 2020 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction factor as shown on Table 2B was derived from the 2017 Collier County AUIR Reports. The annual growth rate was also obtained from the 2017 AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2020 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 213. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2017 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2020 vested trips 'Y' background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 2B. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2020 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 2C provides a summary of the 2017 thru 2020 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build -out. 6 35.0 County Road 951 36.1 94.0 E. Tamiami Trail 95.1.a 95.1.b TABLE2B 2017 & 2020 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2020 2020 Peak Hour 2017 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips v h DIR AUIRof phDd) (vphod)v( Dhod) Rattlesnake to Tamiami Trail 1860 N 2.00% 1974 347 2207 Tamiami Trail to Wal-Mart 1500 N 2.00% 1592 209 1709 Triangle to C.R. 951 1620 E 2.00% 1719 203 1823 C.R. 951 to Site 770 E 4.00% 866 241 1011 Site to Joseph Lane 770 E 4.00% 866 241 1011 35.0 County Road 951 Rattlesnake to Tamiami Trail 36.1 Tamiami Trail to Wal-Mart 94.0 E. Tamiami Trail Triangle to C.R. 951 95.1.a C.R. 951 to Site 95.1.b Site to Joseph lane TABLE 2C 2020 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEICAPACITY ANALYSIS 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2017 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non -PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction vI Dhodl LOS jvnhndl Dir LOS jwhodl Lir [vim) Dir (vphpo) jvahodl vlc Ratio LOS 1860 C 2207 N C 2 N 2 S 2209 3200 0.69 C 1500 C 1709 N C 2 N 2 S 1711 2500 0.68 C 1820 C 1823 E C 3 E 3 W 1826 3000 0.61 C 770 B 1011 E B 6 E 6 W 1017 3100 0.33 B 770 B 1011 E B 2 W 2 E 1013 3100 0.33 B JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIc/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT METHODLOCY For STOR-ALL Inland Village (Tamiami Trail East, Collier County, Florida) April 2, 2018 Counly TIS Review Fees TIS Metl)odoloU Revie>7+ ftee = $500.00 ✓ TIS (Small -Scale Study) Review Fee = $0.00 ✓ Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERINO, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE 15W NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 19 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 87830 (PROJECT No. 18031 1 ) /4 1+•Z-20/ JAMES E . BANK®, P.E. DAT Fl.t=1RI A REO. NO. 4.3860 MI APPENDIX A INITIAL MLII MG CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: 4-2-2018 Time: N/A Location: Collier Coun ty Goveriuuent GffWes Orth 113rseshoe Drive People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239-919-2767 2) Stephen Baiuch, Collier County Government 3) 4) Sindy Prc arer• Preparer's Name and Title: James M. Bpnks., E. President Organization: JMD TransRgrtation Engineering, Ino. Address & Telephone Number: 4711 7th Avenue SW Na les Florida 34119 239 -919- 2767 Reviewer(s).- Reviewer's iewers :Reviewer's Name & Title: Stephen Baluch Collier County Transportation Planning Department Applicant: Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Pronosed �, SpP 201-4- �� Name: S•1�ClIt -A1.1.I. at Inland Villa � Location: North side ea Tatni uni 'fail T-. pt and oast of C.R. 251 Land Use Type: Mini -Warehousing ITE Code*: LM 151 v ✓ Proposed numbor of development units.SUS 000.0. of mini-wa. r�� Other: Description: Zoning: Commercial Existing: Vacant Comprehensive plaii recommendation: Requested; Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached C,1Usars AAw AL BanksWaSNopIPROJECT91 Colyer CcunIyA1B0311 Tarolama hd1 E SaU SlaraFlolAlaPW*gYRsyod dDo MZ Study hype_ Sroall-Scale TIS Study Area; J Boundaries: Based upon Elie Goutitv's 2%,2!/s & 21% iml2act rule. See attached Additional intersections to be analyzed: Horizon Year(s): 2020 v Analysis Time Period(s): PM Peak Future Off -Site Developments: None V/ Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE TriD Generation .Manual 10 th Edition(See T ie Reductions in Trin Genal saes: Pass -by trips: Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Yenr Roadway Network Imp rove eat : 2022 Ver Collier Count 's 5- ear CM,. Methodology & Assumutions: Non -site traff c estimates: 5, eg,. AttUIIecl Site -trip generation: See Table 1 Trip distribution method: Based upon manual assignment See Table 2A & u 2 ` Traffic assignment method: Bused LiMn manual assignment [See Table 2A & Fiaiire _21 Traffic growth rate: Per Collier Co►�nt ACFIR Re or usin owth rate or ested tri method whicliever is upater. C:IUsersusimM BeAksiDuA44PROJECTS11Cofer Cmjn1 ISM117aWfaTrOEdue ms Special F'catures=(from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: None Sight distance: None Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On-site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study — No Fee X Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. SIGNATURES Study Preparer 0�1o& Reviewers Cf,LJA ViR6d Applicant C.1Usent1Jemes M. 6enksWoshkONOJECTSII Co& COMA1B0911 TAInfeW TIMI E SM/SlaWMeMad*pyRepMrtdw M �- 3 a, J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING STOR ALL AT INLAND VILLAGE SITE PIAN EXHIBIT TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS STOR-ALL at Inland Village CCode, Land Use Desrriptig _Maximum Build Schedule 151 Minl-Warehouse 105,7 s.f. Code Tri_ P� Trip Generation E uation Total Trios Trios Ents r8xit LUC 151 Daily Traffic (ADT) _ ✓ T =1.51(X) = ✓159 ADT V, AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.10(X) = �/ 11 vph 6 / 5 60% Enter/ 40% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.17(X) = v 18 vph 9 / 9 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = r M6 It NORTH / N.T.S. Price Street **% z / y I 30 �o a � �I IHendoroon Creak LEGEND Ute► Project Traffic Distribution by Percentage Tower Road JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, ING. STOR-ALL n Inland Village Project Generated FIGURE 2A g April 2, 2018 Traffic Distribution N17 TABLE 2A PROJECTS AREA OF IMPACT Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) - 9 Entering Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph)= 9 Exiting 94.0 i/ E. Tamiami Trail Triangle to C.R. 951 6D E 3000 35%/ 3 ✓ E v 3 d W ✓ 2% 0.11% NO LOS Service 6D D 3100 70% 6 +f E 6./ W ✓ 2% 0.20% NO Project 6D D 3100 30% / 3 `i W ✓ 3./ E 2% 0.090% NO Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non -PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant class LOS (whpd) %Dist tmhpdl Pk Dir vj�ihl 2ffi Standard Impact Immact 35.0 ✓ County Road 951 Rattlesnake to Tarniami Trail 6D E 3200. 25.0% ✓ 2 v N v 2 v S V 2% 0.07% NO 36.1 ✓ Tamiami Trail iD WaWart 6D D 2500 20.0%✓ 2 ✓ N %/ 2,/ S V 2% 0.07% NO 94.0 i/ E. Tamiami Trail Triangle to C.R. 951 6D E 3000 35%/ 3 ✓ E v 3 d W ✓ 2% 0.11% NO 95.1.a C.R. 951 to Site 6D D 3100 70% 6 +f E 6./ W ✓ 2% 0.20% NO 95.1.b Site to Joseph Lane 6D D 3100 30% / 3 `i W ✓ 3./ E 2% 0.090% NO 3 35.0 County Road 951 35.1 94.0 E Tamlami Tral 95.1.a 95.1.b TABLE 2B 2017 & 2020 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per ve-gkd Trips IIIethc Per Growth Rafe Method 2020 2020 Peak Hour 2017 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rabe PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested TrOs (whodl DiR AUIR typhpcO (YDhDd) h Rattlesnake to Tamiaml Trail 1880 N 2.00% ✓ 1974 347 2207 Tamlami Trac to Wal -Matt 1500 N 2.00% ✓ 1592 209 1709 Triangle to CR 951 1620 E 2.00% 1719 203 1823 C.R 951 to Site 770 E 4.00% 866 241 1011 Slte to Joseph Lane 770 E 4.00% 866 241 1011 TABLE 2C 2020 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEICAPACITY ANALYSIS 10 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2017 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. vol. ButldOut Build -Out Peak Hour PK Dlrecdon Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction', Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Hort-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction (whpd) LOS (vyPhnd) Dir LOS (vahod) Dir (voh) Dir (vphpd) (vnhDdl v/c Ratio LOS 35.0 County Road 951 Rattlesnake to Tamiami Trail 1860 C 2207 N C 2 N 2 S 2209 3200 0.69 C 36.1 Tandami Trail to Wa"bd 1500 C 1709 N C 2 N 2 S 1711 2600 0.66 C 94.0 E Tamiami Trail Triangle to C.R. 951 1620 C 1823 E C 3 E 3 W 1826 3000 0.61 C 95.1.a C.R. 951 to Sipe 770 B 1011 E B 6 E 6 W 1017 3100 0.33 B 95.1.15 Site to Joseph Lane 770 B 1011 E B 3 W 3 E 1014 3100 0.33 B 10 1 TITLE DESCRIPTION 2 TRLE INFORMATION •.a..A.s• me>,.emx.v 6 CEMETERY a , SURVEYOR CERTFFICATION ,.iv.. t "r9$ ;� .Iar.=�im,.w�o�„t,1 a . ,»��. ,xe flw�[rov a u,aam w ns O.crna,ec [ouvxen �' Approved CDS Surveyor J ON 3 E "”` •` ce axr. —, COWER COIIxLT,7 LSCHEDULE'B'rrEMS 11 Ij NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE 'B% ,rn mono mora a mm— o- ry xE=w o<raue.evr- STATEMENT OF ENCROACHMENTS AS SURVEYED LEGAL �=+c mar.�.c+.n,leu xcl raegt•><s'a<nw E 11 ZONING INFORMATION (�lulemmmma w w+runa. voeutq. • j1" SURVEYORS NOTES 9 I LEGEND ASS c � • erl a o� � rr3, „Q�. ,v�:euro m aMN mRI ehAx w. mi _ P w� eoo. � .a fj FLOOD INFORMATION w�e2mwi�..�ro�te�ene 112' PARIGNG INFORMATION a� F10' BASIS OF BEARINGS =d i Key W CDS ALTA Survey J 0 J � eo,mv,rarn,m R l RN>awa.ww s l wper.n' 16:1 — 1a!I www 1Ai NvnYN,R .. lir' .�"•"�"-^" jisi VICINITY MAP MnwrY MAv f311 LAND AREA is BUILDING AREA 15. BURRING HEIGHT 8 ALTAMSPS Land Tele Survey �•,�TN. vro. ceewHeue j AIF '•II K r-. t. -.FS +« ca u D:sy'ra Nr ,m>Arr .r o.k w.Nxn nirnvrr . IiepAred r� STOR-ALL DEVELOMIENT 20 II PROJECT ADDRESS rArAle rFuy., NAP�p, tL STOfMLL NAPLES CRD Tmfq 17-T 1 v'M), UNE TABLE BE�tP.M �n+r•IW ser >r oti a AM—d COS twu . g SURVEY DRAWING 851'2'.'1B'E �GD¢fDl �� •r. v� •1 su•a-�e•, mn.�=Tri c ,coax, O@ MT7- x'i�msEre�cx ur � - _ 1 I RETENTON POND _ IyEp faA en`�var 1 Ml IR (O.B�$ (OR 4001. PO. 3B) q pg g `` �'� �N9E°D� i Y3 Y3 3! +wattawuw�m `try - —._ _ _ _ _ _ $ $ '__, 3 W y (DR. 4WD, Pc. sstI) ~ �v ram SIS Mm mcvuen) '�' v- & (0 VAC°AN �x; Ini bYKp �ruim z �� - .�.,..B ----------------'_--------- _-----------F---- w - POINTOFBEGMNNG -�- j,� O k¢. °xx F �c smcL ;nacxrsr -7 xm �_�.. • Tuvcr eN� >R �, xdt�r- J N..i�e . R IP` — N3r'4 W MODTF) r i MR. wa vn -1) tx x/x UM �T OP ® e' mr�TE - _ T xO�K OL x tt COMMENCEMENT . NmT TNiLT1 ii=n£ �4 xra.xN - {{iatt FVIp /p0] — w reye Rq( SONE " - 6a' �7 NORTH ARROW (SCALE sit 3 r 1 1811 AL^`ANSPS +dTMeSunmy TN W"R CmNiYe By. �Abue�OW">�lm i TN Fm: BBSISTTBTB nt Pt p F- STLN4AI.L OEl'� JAII(:YE ,CI -x nl.xx 20 PROJECTAMRESS TAMWAI TRAM NAPLES, R Pry ItmrY. STOR-ALL NAPLES ta3.+oNe[Mmb� tr-ip-poto7 bunt� Growth Management Department Development Review Division May 08, 2018 Joe Cyganiak J.R. Evans Engineering 9351 Corkscrew Road, Suite 102 Estero, FL 33928 RE: Final Plat No. PL20170003955 Inland Village (FP) Dear Applicant: Please be advised that on May 8, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) approved the final plat for recording, subject to stipulations noted below. According to Section 10.02.04 B.7.a of the Collier County Land Development Code, the plat must be recorded within 18 months of the Board's approval. Please utilize the Plat Recording Application which can be found on our webpage. Stipulation: • Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. This permit is conditioned on all other applicable state or federal permits being obtained before commencement of the development. • Transportation Planning 01/23/18 Informational Comment: TIS — Since there are no development units that would generate vehicle trips included with this final plat, there is no need for a TIS report. No further review for transportation concurrency (adequacy for roadway capacity) is required. • Transportation Planning 01/23/18 Informational Comment: County ROW Permit— No County ROW permit is required since no work is shown within the County public ROW. • Development Review - Fill in the OR Book and Page of the Restrictions in the General Notes prior to recording of the plat. If I can be of any further assistance to you in this regard, please let me know. Sincerely, i Develo#N"t �evieu� DCvi�co c Growth Management Department 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2400 7 tRA.^Fa LELY gE50RT SV,S FREEDOM SQUARE f #� 'AAC. b fR' s C-4 04 4 C S qRr .��1 06345 C-3°® G� MDSI PUD FALUNG WATERS BEACH RESORT LS, w4' LL fA CPUD . is -5 n® TAMIAMI GROSSING% " CA ORrc 3 A,° V vu -e s EAGLE CBEFIf mo PARCEL 3A 27 41 ACRES 9 ORrc xfUD•,OD", V R`EI EAGLE CBEFIf mo 1 TA<rP, At PUD".>a4N ARTESA POINTE _ PUD WINDING CYPRESS DW -- 'ND'CATES SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY 16035 YJ INDEX , i.G �B1 ,�_ � E I c TIG IS TO CERTIFY MAT MIS IS A PACE OF THE OFFlCIAL ZONING ATLAS REFERRED TO AND ApO M BY REFERS BY 0ANNANM Na 01-L, OF THE SHOPS AT E -E OREF!( ONT ONF ! DtYSfAL LANE tERRAt6 AT EASE CRE£K iuEd,ER woAL aTr,ER RwLAr REMT M Ye -T4 sz-S.T sss' ry a �. 'g aa�1i' sem' 1: SS �ja 'A.e !fii i ���.n - - Ss: xt. THE OODNTY OF COWER. FLORIDA ADOPTED . E 22. 21— o c.Nv`N ca.EnD,u l—,N G�TSTAL �EmiACE° as �e ' C =_. gf��i�TF _ R�AyyF ;.x}� f i y 3 �J atYYY'�a,�_� � - a # _ t LANE T — CRFD( 1F ]?A a 1s, �E-: Riaa:'� $s 4�iri e4 �BY h : A a OAl.AN COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDI e a. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION -A- R"888V R g��7 `__ ,�w�+ xtl3�= 1 aq a=- SECTS} •A .. _ . TNP 51S RNG 26E 3 NO :'4..?1A.__.:.:_,...:.. -"^•"`" ---`9RapaNR1CARRRsRRXRARRR4�.QY7SCYSRowr O®40©O©O AM. amN 3CALE MAP NUMBER: ® 1603N WHEREAS, American Engineering Consultants, Inc., representing Mario Curialo, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners.to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFOR13 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property as more particularly described by Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, and located in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "A" to "C-5" and the Official Zoning Atlas Map Number 1603N, as described in Ordinance 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code is hereby amended accordingly. The herein described real property is the same for which the rezone is hereby approved subject to the following conditions; 1. The following uses are hereby authorized: 0C .y r„` n. ORDINANCE NO. 97- 3 N � �f 1) c+� 01 bold --,,AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER r� dLGr 91-102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH ESTABLISHED THE Rl�l`�L'' COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 1603H BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL SOUTH (U.S. 41) 1/4 MILE EAST OF ISLE OF CAPRI ROAD (S.R. 951), IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RA14GE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM "A" TO "C-5" FOR A BUILDING SUPPLY STORE; PROVIDING FOR STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION STIPULATIONS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, American Engineering Consultants, Inc., representing Mario Curialo, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners.to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFOR13 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property as more particularly described by Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, and located in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "A" to "C-5" and the Official Zoning Atlas Map Number 1603N, as described in Ordinance 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code is hereby amended accordingly. The herein described real property is the same for which the rezone is hereby approved subject to the following conditions; 1. The following uses are hereby authorized: 0C at. Unless otherwise provided, all permitted uses in the C-4 general commercial district. b. Building Materials, Hardware, Garden Center (Groups 5211-5261). C. Building Construction - General Construction and Operative Builders (Groups 1521-1542). d. Ccnstruction - Special Trade Contractors (Groups 1711, 1793, 1796, 1799). 2. A precast masonry decorative fence six (6) feet high shall be constructed along the property line contiguous to the Woodfield Lakes PUD. 3. No buildings or building material storage may occur within sixty (60) feet of the contiguous lot line within Woodfield Lakes PUD. 4. No building or structure shall exceed a height of twenty-eight (28) feat. 5. The wall of any building or structure adjacent to Woodfield Lakes shall be insulated to inhibit noise emissions to said property. 6. Arterial level street lighting shall be installed at the project entrance on U.S. 41 as part of the development of the first phase. 7. The site plan shall be consistent with the requirements of Ordinance 93-64 with respect to turn lanes, minimum throat distances and internal traffic circulation. 8. Substantial competent evidence of the project's ability to accept, detain and treat historic surface runoff from the roadway shall be presented at the time of an application for a Site Development Plan. 9. Any approval for this project shall not vest any right to a median opening, now or in the future, along any project roadway frontage. Access may be constrained to a right-in/right-out only. 10. Subsequent approval of a Site Development Plan shall provide for cross or shared access with properties to the west of this property so that shared access is achieved, leading to the Tamiami Trail. A& This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. -2- b I � J � 'i` f _y Ile, 6,)o 6)oi w 1 `'300. nrs 4fEtON Ns rDR oEscnrllaH PURroSCs dILY AHD 1S'f A ANIKY 722.24' 1HYEpW A C a T O AJEST CN ANAarAM N 89'18'11 W LR+E H A l -or► p't luno Gus FNA iNE I NORM RY71i-Dr-wFY IJNC Or 45 jit, I SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOT TO SCALE REZONED PROPERTY- MARIO CURIALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 ` 2 EAST 1/4 CORNER Or SEC?,M 3 IOWISIMP 11 S RANGE xa E � g CA BEING A PARCEL OF LAND THAT IS LYING WITHIN THE NORTH -HALF ( N1/2 ) OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER ( E 1/4 ) CORNER OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED SECTION 3; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 612.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 722.24 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF A COUNTY DRAINAGE CANAL AND THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF US 141 ( AXA. S.R. 90, TAMIAMI TRAIL ). A 200 FEET WIDE ROADWAY, THENCE NORTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH -RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2132.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 515,00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 400.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 515.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 400.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 4.73 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THE BEARINGS USED FOR THIS DESCRIPTION ARE BASED UPON AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST FOR THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID US #41, THIS DESCRIPPION WAS PREPARED BY: T. ALAN NEAL. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER PREPARED BY FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO. 4656 AMERICAN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. 790 mom* omni HapmS R .11No] (9,1) 6,1-1551 (f Ax 919-7112 573 ANA Ld= 0, 4AACD 4 L"M rL (D+1) 39+-1697 (r Ax 30 7571 FILE: 99070903.DWG SHEET 2 Of 2 JOB No.; 9907-09-03 LEGEND DENOTES BASIS OF BEARINGS DENOTES SUBJECT AREA ♦ 4w P.O.C. a DENOTES POINT OF COMIAENCEIAENT 's P.O.B. - DENOTES POINT OF BEGINNING M I � J � 'i` f _y Ile, 6,)o 6)oi w 1 `'300. nrs 4fEtON Ns rDR oEscnrllaH PURroSCs dILY AHD 1S'f A ANIKY 722.24' 1HYEpW A C a T O AJEST CN ANAarAM N 89'18'11 W LR+E H A l -or► p't luno Gus FNA iNE I NORM RY71i-Dr-wFY IJNC Or 45 jit, I SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOT TO SCALE REZONED PROPERTY- MARIO CURIALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 ` 2 EAST 1/4 CORNER Or SEC?,M 3 IOWISIMP 11 S RANGE xa E � g CA BEING A PARCEL OF LAND THAT IS LYING WITHIN THE NORTH -HALF ( N1/2 ) OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER ( E 1/4 ) CORNER OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED SECTION 3; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 612.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 722.24 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF A COUNTY DRAINAGE CANAL AND THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF US 141 ( AXA. S.R. 90, TAMIAMI TRAIL ). A 200 FEET WIDE ROADWAY, THENCE NORTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH -RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2132.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 515,00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 400.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 515.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 400.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 4.73 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THE BEARINGS USED FOR THIS DESCRIPTION ARE BASED UPON AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST FOR THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID US #41, THIS DESCRIPPION WAS PREPARED BY: T. ALAN NEAL. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER PREPARED BY FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO. 4656 AMERICAN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. 790 mom* omni HapmS R .11No] (9,1) 6,1-1551 (f Ax 919-7112 573 ANA Ld= 0, 4AACD 4 L"M rL (D+1) 39+-1697 (r Ax 30 7571 FILE: 99070903.DWG SHEET 2 Of 2 JOB No.; 9907-09-03 --- ---- TOP OF PARAPET ---- -- ---- N - _ `O _ T.O. ROOF DECK oL ELEV. +32'-6" TOP OF PARAPET N ----------- I --------- NORTH PROPERTY LINE e \. -------------- qnn0o v �no EXISTING 6' WALL PROPOSED RETENTION AREA 60'-0" ORIGINAL 137'-0" PROPOSED FALLING WATER COMMUNITY DYNAMIC CROSS SECTION SCALE 1"=10' REVISIONS BY 60 to'�1tt J'' fl/ � W ® � < Adj- n� X O LH a) } Lu Ll t a) X �— } _ \-- W/ U Q) o O Lu O O J -u O ' z Date 12/05/18 Scale 146 &HOWN Drawn UJE Job # 201703 Sheet A-6 Of Sheets