Loading...
Agenda 01/17/2019 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION Municipal Services Taxing & Benefit Unit NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING THURSDAY, JANUARY 17, 2019 THE LANDSCAPE & SAFETY COMMITTEE OF THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION WILL MEET AT 1 :00 PM ON JANUARY 17 AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY, LOCATED AT 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FL 34108. AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda approval 4. Approval of 12/20/18 meeting minutes 5. Audience comments 6. Sidewalk Construction Project Update (ABB reports) 7. Update on line of sight conflicts (Marion reports) 8. Committee Member comments 9. Chairman's comments a. Pelican Bay Blvd. South Entrance 10. Adjournment ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER ITEM TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. THE BOARD WILL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUBJECTS NOT ON THIS AGENDA AND ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE BOARD ENCOURAGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO,AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IS MADE, WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS AN ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AT (239) 597-1749 OR VISIT PELICAN BAYSERVICESDIVISION.NET. 01/10/2019 2:14 PM PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION LANDSCAPE & SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING DECEMBER 20,2018 The Landscape & Safety Committee of the Pelican Bay Services Division met on Thursday, December 20 at 1:00 p.m. at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, located at 8960 Hammock Oak Drive,Naples, Florida 34108. The following members attended. Landscape & Safety Committee Nick Fabregas Joe Chicurel, Chairman Pete Griffith (absent) Tom Cravens Mike Shepherd Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Mary McCaughtry, Operations Analyst Neil Dorrill, Administrator Lisa Jacob, Associate Project Manager Marion Bolick, Operations Manager Barbara Shea, Recording Secretary Also Present Susan O'Brien, PBSD Board Tom Barber, Agnoli, Barber& Brundage Scott Streckenbein, PBSD Board John Gandolfo,PBF Board Tania Wrobleski, Sheriff's Office APPROVED AGENDA (AS AMENDED) 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda approval 4. Approval of 09/20/18 meeting minutes 5. Audience comments 6. Sidewalk Construction Project Update (Lisa/Neil reports) a. Engineering study progress report b. Financing update c. Seagate Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road sidewalk discussion d. Plan of action time line discussion 7. Myra Janco Daniels Crosswalk situation(Lisa reports) a. Line of sight issues (add-on) b. Project updates (add-on) 8. Widening of the median on Gulf Park Drive at the RIGHT TURN ONLY section discussion 9. Operations Dept's 2019 outline of projects (Marion report) 10. Committee Member comments 11. Chairman's comments 12. Adjournment 1 1 Pelican Bay Services Division Landscape& Safety Committee Meeting December 20,2018 ROLL CALL Mr. Griffith was absent and a quorum was established AGENDA APPROVAL Mr.Cravens motioned,Mr.Fabregas seconded to approve the agenda as amended with the addition of items #7a and #7b. The motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF 09/20/18 MEETING MINUTES Mr. Cravens motioned, Mr. Shepherd seconded to approve the 09/20/18 meeting minutes as presented. The motion carried unanimously. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Ms. O'Brien suggested that the committee obtain an update on the "no outlet" sign on Crayton Rd. under agenda item#7b. Mr. John Gandolfo requested an update on the US 41 berm landscaping project. Ms.Jacob commented that the project is "in process" with the County Procurement Dept. and will be going out for bid shortly. SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT UPDATE Mr. Dorrill commented that per PBSD Board direction, Agnoli, Barber, & Brundage has been tasked to provide an engineering analysis and cost projection to replace all Pelican Bay pathways with concrete sidewalks. ENGINEERING STUDY PROGRESS REPORT Mr. Tom Barber, engineering consultant with ABB,commented on the progress of the six- foot wide concrete sidewalk replacement study. Highlights included(1)a draft of the"opinion of cost"report has been provided to staff, (2)total cost is estimated at$5.7 million,which includes a 20% contingency and any necessary landscape replacement, (3) most of the GIS work has been completed, (4) a total of 13 trees would require removal, (5) sidewalks on Vanderbilt Beach Rd. from US 41 to the Ritz were included; sidewalks on Seagate Drive were not included, and (6)the next step is to reflect the location of the sidewalks onto a GIS map. FINANCING UPDATE Mr. Dorrill commented that Mr. Mark Isackson, County Budget Director, will provide a "financing alternatives"presentation to the PBSD Board at its January board meeting. Mr. Dorrill reported on a recent meeting with Mr. Nick Casalanguida, Deputy County Manager. Items discussed included (1) a schedule and exhibit of all Pelican Bay drainage easements (near completion by County staff), and (2) preliminary architectural drawings and two conceptual site plans for a new Operations Center at 6200 Watergate Way. SEAGATE DRIVE AND VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD SIDEWALKS Mr. Dorrill commented that there was no direction from the PBSD Board to include Seagate Drive in the concrete replacement engineering study. Mr. Fabregas noted that existing sidewalks on Seagate Drive are four-feet wide and have high pedestrian traffic. By consensus,the 2 Pelican Bay Services Division Landscape & Safety Committee Meeting December 20,2018 committee agreed that ABB should include the cost to replace Seagate Drive sidewalks in a separate line item in their final report. PLAN OF ACTION TIME LINE DISCUSSION Mr. Tom Barber commented that the final sidewalk replacement study report may be available for the January 7 PBSD Board meeting, but no later than the February meeting. Mr. Dorrill commented that we are within 60—90 days of obtaining financing proposals. SEASONAL SHERIFF'S PATROLS IN PELICAN BAY Mr. Dorrill commented that the PBSD historically funded additional law enforcement patrols in Pelican Bay. However, these patrols were suspended last year when a majority of supplemental Sheriff's Office resources were allocated to increased security at our schools. Cpl. Tania Wrobleski suggested that we put in a request to the Sheriff's Office if we are interested in extra CCSO patrols, although these may be difficult to obtain. She also commented that the fine for making a left turn onto US 41 from Gulf Park Drive is $160. MYRA JANCO DANIELS CROSSWALK Ms. Jacob commented on the recent County re-striping of the crosswalk on Myra Janco Daniels Blvd. near the St. Williams Church and the Waterside Shops. The PBSD will be responsible for the installation of four additional signs at this crosswalk. Mr. Dorrill commented that although we will follow up with providing the signage, no tree removal will be pursued. Ms. O'Brien suggested that we talk to personnel at the St.Williams Church,who may have valuable input on church pedestrian traffic. LINE OF SIGHT ISSUES (ADD-ON) Dr. Chicurel and committee members discussed areas in Pelican Bay with "line of sight" conflicts(with landscaping), many of which can only be observed from a sedan-type vehicle. Mr. Dorrill commented that staff will complete an inventory of"line of sight"conflicts at intersections, with specific evaluation of plant height and tree trunks, throughout Pelican Bay. PROJECT UPDATES (ADD-ON) Ms. Jacob provided project updates which included (1) the streetlight pole project is near completion; the final phase which includes the installation of four new bollard lights will be completed in January, (2) the street sign project contract has been awarded; a pre-construction meeting has been scheduled for early January, and(3)the"no outlet" sign for Crayton Rd. will be included in the next group of"add-on" signs to be installed. Ms. O'Brien commented that the "no outlet" sign for Crayton Rd. was approved by the PBSD Board in April and she suggested that we install a temporary sign. WIDENING OF THE MEDIAN ON GULF PARK DRIVE Dr. Chicurel reported that staff is placing three quasi-permanent posts at the end of the former left turn lane at the intersection of Gulf Park Dr. and US 41. Mr. Dorrill reported that he has a scheduled January meeting with Senator Passidomo, which will provide an opportunity to discuss possible FDOT funding for a US 41 median alteration (at the intersection of Gulf Park Dr.). By committee consensus it was agreed that Mr. Dorrill will 3 Pelican Bay Services Division Landscape & Safety Committee Meeting December 20,2018 work with our engineer to prepare an exhibit of a proposed median alteration to share with the senator. By consensus, the committee was in favor of widening the median at the east end of Gulf Park Dr. which would remove the former left turn lane at the east end of Gulf Park Dr. ABB will prepare a drawing of the recommended widened median. Mr. John Gandolfo commended the committee for working on the safety improvements at this intersection. OPERATIONS DEPT'S 2019 OUTLINE OF PROJECTS Mr. Bolick reported (1) the US 41 berm restoration project is expected to begin in the Spring, (2) a new tree trimming RFP is in process, and (3)pine straw, in-house mulching, and re- sodding work is on-going. Ms. O'Brien asked whether the installation of the plants and trees is included in the US 41 berm restoration project. Mr. Bolick confirmed that landscaping installation will be included in the project and exclusively performed by the contracted vendor. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS None CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS None ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 2:19 p.m. Joe Chicurel, Chairman Minutes approved [ ] as presented OR [ ] as amended ON [ ] date 4 .... i ....7..4.1 (411 1\\ . ..--. • ''''.s: I,11111 ' I 1,:•• I-- , , 1 ••••t:;) I . CO l— .44 4# 0 0..-: U L - 17) .92 g TA I"-- ..--:-. ' 1 .„ 1 -' . • I 1 .n p cJ , ,t••7:, •: ; 1 I I a) -4 F', ) '< 1 0: , r 1 , 0 I 1 4, 4-tci.-_, !LI • 4 - -I ' I 1 t•-.) , •-• r_."7.t•-,v) b.., .. .: 1 1 r.71 I I It• I C.., ilti • Ll I —• I c `11•4 I • t ' , ' ' -'-f) IN -.1 ''',,s... .•-.. I el c) ' II I I ••••...,• (._.) .... - ._ '. i ,‹ -,/ *--7 _ J,I. II . , ....... ,..,... , . • 1 \ _ ..._ NJ , ,....... . '1 I I ___--- t---... i/ , /' , it ' H II 1 " —, <-, I 1‘ 16 ( 0/17F1 AVS NV.3.171d 1\, LI, c ...- .... il ' I 1t v) ( ,, '--i,"-r—`,.:) I 1 ••,.. i , 1 kti CI 1 J ) t • L ... ...,, , ..._,,. I 1 1•1411"-• 01:. --- r , I - - 1 , ' , , \ I ' / .\,.._ .. Aci , \ . 4"' -..e "--..-.. ' \ • -`L I „, I... •- . ' .111 . ,t) cr_.,i- —,....s,-_, I , U ._ `si- CC UI I' • V) •-- I C3 T...LI ii. tri NI : -LI CI: Vi � � Ij1' A- , x £.. g k � . _ � - r ;40-T - 4 ' 'i''' iitt .14, ...... *„ /4.4 j .q t .- , . tthiw,::::„„:„,...„-i„A„.,4„.7.4.-.5,-- * q # i , 1 f, �' µ "„ F , i. ,;:t.::, ,,, — . m e s x �' #t k • 4 wily d " t i''''',II:,•:','II,II''' 44. s.. • ii ti �, Agnoli, Barber&Brundage, Inc Engineer's Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost lits January 1, 2019 i) al PN: 18-0086 PELICAN BAY SIDEWALK Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Total Cost Cost 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $220,000.00 $220,000.00 2 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS 1 $235,000.00 $235,000.00 3 DEMOLITION-ASPHALT SIDEWALK SY 38,771 $3.50 $135,699.28 4 DEMOLITION-CONCRETE SIDEWALK SY 6,606 $25.00 $165,161.11 5 DEMOLITION-CLEARING AND GRUBBING(SHRUBS,SOD,MISC.) SY 15,126 $10.00 $151,258.89 6 REGRADING AREA(Demolition,Earthwork,Curbing,Sod&Landscape) LF 640 $100.00 $63,980.14 7 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL OAK EA 7 $1,700.00 $11,900.00 8 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL SABAL EA 7 $600.00 $4,200.00 9 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL PINE EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 10 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL MAHOGANY EA 2 $1,300.00 $2,600.00 11 ADA COMPLIANT DETECTABLE WARNINGS EA 180 $250.00 $45,000.00 12 PAVERS-RESTORATION AT CROSSWALKS EA 80 $5,000.00 $400,000.00 13 CONCRETE-2'VALLEY GUTTER(50'per each crosswalk) LF 6,100 $20.00 $122,000.00 14 CONCRETE-6"THICK SIDEWALK SY 45,378 $44.00 $1,996,617.33 15 REGULATORY SIGNAGE-R1-1 EA 122 $1,000.00 $122,000.00 16 THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING,STD,WHITE,SOLID-6"WIDTH(50'per each crosswalk) LF 6,100 $3.00 $18,300.00 17 THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING,STD,WHITE,SOLID-24"WIDTH(15'per each crosswalk LF 1,845 $12.00 $22,140.00 18 LANDSCAPE-RELOCATE EXSTING IRRIGATION LS 1 $260,000.00 $260,000.00 19 LANDSCAPE-RESTORE SOD(6'x sidewalk length) SY 48,383 $5.00 $241,916.67 20 ADJUST ELECTRIC HANDHOLE TOP TO GRADE EA 15 $1,000.00 $15,000.00 21 ADJUST IRRIGATION VALVE BOX TO GRADE EA 102 $250.00 $25,500.00 22 ADJUST MISC UTILITY CONFLICT EA 22 $1,500.00 $33,000.00 23 MISC CONFLICT EA 107 $1,000.00 $107,000.00 24 RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANT EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 25 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LF 145,150 $1.50 $217,725.00 26 ROOT REMOVAL EA 96 $800.00 $76,800.00 27 BIO-BARRIER ROOT CONTROL EA 96 $400.00 $38,400.00 28 REPLACEMENT TREES EA 18 $2,000.00 $36,000.00 TOTAL $4,772,698.41 SURVEYING(750W day*108 days*$1,200k/day) EA 1 $130,000.00 $130,000.00 ENGINEERING EA 1 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 PERMITTING EA 1 $43,000.00 $43,000.00 SURVEY CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT EA 1 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES EA 1 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 ROW PERMIT AND FEES EA 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 20%CONTINGENCY $1,039,139.68 PROJECT TOTAL $6,234,838.10 Agnoli, Barber& Brundage, Inc Engineer's Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost December 14, 2018 PN: 18-0086 PELICAN BAY SIDEWALK Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Total Cost Cost 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 2 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS 1 $220,000.00 $220,000.00 3 DEMOLITION-ASPHALT SIDEWALK SY 38,771 $3.50 $135,699.28 4 DEMOLITION-CONCRETE SIDEWALK SY 5,018 $25.00 $125,438.89 5 DEMOLITION-CLEARING AND GRUBBING(SHRUBS,SOD,MISC.) SY 1,673 $10.00 $16,725.19 6 REGRADING AREA(Demolition,Earthwork,Curbing,Sod&Landscape) LF 640 $100.00 $63,980.14 7 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL OAK EA 6 $1,700.00 $10,200.00 8 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL SABAL EA 5 $600.00 $3,000.00 9 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL PINE EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 10 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL MAHOGANY EA 1 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 11 ADA COMPLIANT DETECTABLE WARNINGS EA 168 $250.00 $42,000.00 12 PAVERS-RESTORATION AT CROSSWALKS EA 68 $5,000.00 $340,000.00 13 CONCRETE-2'VALLEY GUTTER(50'per each crosswalk) LF 5,800 $20.00 $116,000.00 14 CONCRETE-6"THICK SIDEWALK SY 43,789 $44.00 $1,926,706.22 15 REGULATORYSIGNAGE-R1-1 EA 116 $1,000.00 $116,000.00 16 THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING,STD,WHITE,SOLID-6"WIDTH(50'per each crosswalk) LF 5,800 $3.00 $17,400.00 17 THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING,STD,WHITE,SOLID-24"WIDTH(15'per each crosswalk LF 1,755 $12.00 $21,060.00 18 LANDSCAPE-RELOCATE EXSTING IRRIGATION LS 1 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 19 LANDSCAPE-RESTORE SOD(6'x sidewalk length) SY 46,477 $5.00 $232,383.33 20 ADJUST ELECTRIC HANDHOLE TOP TO GRADE EA 12 $1,000.00 $12,000.00 21 ADJUST IRRIGATION VALVE BOX TO GRADE EA 101 $250.00 $25,250.00 22 ADJUST MISC UTILITY CONFLICT EA 17 $1,500.00 $25,500.00 23 MISC CONFLICT EA 107 $1,000.00 $107,000.00 24 RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANT EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 25 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LF 139,430 $1.50 $209,145.00 26 ROOT REMOVAL EA 93 $800.00 $74,400.00 27 BIO-BARRIER ROOT CONTROL EA 93 $400.00 $37,200.00 TOTAL $4,332,388.04 SURVEYING(750ft/day*100 days*$1,200k/day) EA 1 $120,000.00 $120,000.00 ENGINEERING EA 1 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 PERMITTING EA 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 SURVEY CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT EA 1 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES EA 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 ROW PERMIT AND FEES EA 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 20%CONTINGENCY $944,477.61 PROJECT TOTAL $5,666,865.65 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION LANDSCAPE & SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING JANUARY 17,2019 The Landscape & Safety Committee of the Pelican Bay Services Division met on Thursday, January 17 at 1:00 p.m. at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, located at 8960 Hammock Oak Drive,Naples, Florida 34108. The following members attended. Landscape & Safety Committee Nick Fabregas Joe Chicurel, Chairman Pete Griffith Tom Cravens (absent) Mike Shepherd Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Mary McCaughtry, Operations Analyst Neil Dorrill, Administrator Lisa Jacob, Associate Project Manager Marion Bolick, Operations Manager Barbara Shea, Recording Secretary Also Present John Gandolfo, PBF Board Tom Barber, Agnoli, Barber& Brundage Tania Wrobleski, Sheriffs Office APPROVED AGENDA (AS PRESENTED) 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda approval 4. Approval of 12/20/18 meeting minutes 5. Audience comments 6. Sidewalk Construction Project Update (ABB reports) 7. Update on line of sight conflicts (Marion reports) 8. Committee Member comments 9. Chairman's comments a. Pelican Bay Blvd. South Entrance 10. Adjournment ROLL CALL Mr. Cravens was absent and a quorum was established AGENDA APPROVAL Mr. Shepherd motioned, Mr. Fabregas seconded to approve the agenda as presented. The motion carried unanimously. 1 Pelican Bay Services Division Landscape & Safety Committee Meeting January 17,2019 APPROVAL OF 12/20/18 MEETING MINUTES Mr. Griffith motioned, Mr. Fabregas seconded to approve the 12/20/18 meeting minutes as presented. The motion carried unanimously. AUDIENCE COMMENTS None SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT UPDATE Mr. Tom Barber, engineering consultant with ABB, provided the committee with an updated draft report of"engineer's preliminary opinion of probable cost" of the replacement of PB sidewalks as of 01/01/19 along with the prior 12/14/18 draft. These two documents were added to the record. The new draft contained updated estimates including (1) replacement of Seagate Drive sidewalks with six feet wide concrete sidewalks with an estimated cost of$403,000, (2) 18 replacement tress with an estimated cost of$36,000, (3) clearing and grubbing demolition(line 5) with an estimated cost of$151,259, and (4) a total sidewalk project estimated cost of$6,234,838. Mr. Barber reported that ABB has completed the assigned task of updating the GIS map. After discussion by the committee on whether to replace the existing five feet wide concrete sidewalks on Seagate Drive,the committee and Mr.Dorrill agreed to task ABB to provide an engineer's analysis of the condition (safety and compliance) of the existing Seagate Dr. sidewalks. The committee also requested that ABB provide a cost savings analysis of complete replacement of Seagate Dr. sidewalks vs. repair costs of only those sections which are deemed unsafe. Dr. Chicurel summarized that he will (1) present the updated ABB 01/01/19 "opinion of cost" report and the Seagate Drive sidewalk condition opinion to the full board at its February meeting, (2)make a motion that the committee is requesting the board to approve the draft, which may or may not include the Seagate opinion., and (3) make an additional motion that we approve contingent financing, knowing the County's participation. Mr. Dorrill commented that staff will be asking the full board (based on committee conclusions) for approval that we proceed to construction plans and specifications contingent on the final negotiations on the cost share coming from the County general revenues; an annual County contribution of$300,000 has been suggested during these negotiations. SEASONAL SHERIFF'S PATROLS IN PELICAN BAY Cpl. Tania Wrobleski, Sheriff's Office, commented as follows: • The Sheriff's Office "special detail coordinator" has commented that special law enforcement patrols/details remain unavailable during season,but may be available during the summer months. Supplemental resources continue to be allocated to school security. • Extra CCSO patrols can be requested on the Collier Sheriff website. • Civilian volunteers are assigned where needed, and generally to locations with the highest number of complaints. Mr. Dorrill requested that Cpl. Wrobleski research the extent to which sworn auxiliary deputies are available in the North Naples district. THE INTERSECTION AT GULF PARK DR. AND US 41 2 Pelican Bay Services Division Landscape & Safety Committee Meeting January 17, 2019 Dr. Chicurel commented positively on staffs completion of the "right turn only" project. Mr. Shepherd commented on eastbound vehicles (on Gulf Park Dr.)who continue to turn left onto US 41. Ms. Jacob commented that flexible barrier poles will not be installed in the former left turn lane until after Gulf Park Dr. is repaved (expected to be completed Spring 2019). The committee discussed additional modifications to the intersection including (1) widening the median on Gulf Park Dr. at the intersection of US 41 and reducing traffic to one lane, or (2) an FDOT modification to the US 41 median which would discontinue left turning vehicles into Gulf Park Dr. with no modification to the Gulf Park Dr. median. The committee agreed that future discussion is needed on these additional possible modifications. UPDATE ON LINE OF SIGHT CONFLICTS Mr. Bolick commented on a few intersections with "line of sight" conflicts. Staff has removed the tall shrubs on Pelican Bay Blvd. at the Dorchester intersection. Dr. Chicurel suggested that the "red plants" at the Gulf Park Dr. turnaround be removed, as these plants are blocking the view of westbound vehicles. Dr. Chicurel suggested additional reviews of"line of sight"conflicts at intersections and crosswalks. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS Mr. Griffith asked for an update on the Ridgewood Park re-forestation project. Mr. Bolick commented that he met with our landscape architect, Ms. Ellin Goetz, a few weeks ago and she is in the process of preparing a landscape plan for this area. CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS PELICAN BAY BLVD. SOUTH ENTRANCE Dr. Chicurel commented on the recent FDOT changes being made at the Pelican Bay Blvd. south entrance,and included a schematic of the proposed changes in the agenda packet. Mr.Dorrill commented that he met with State Senator Passidomo who stated(1)FDOT has promised that the street lights along US 41 from Pine Ridge Rd. up to Vanderbilt Beach Rd. are expected to be operating no later than Jan. 25, and (2) FDOT has pledged to further evaluate relocating the new street light pole which is positioned in front of our Pelican Bay entrance monument sign on the south side of this intersection. FDOT has no plans for additional sidewalks to connect this intersection to the Waterside Shops or to extend sidewalks northward on US 41. ADJOURNMENT [The meeting was adjourned at 2:00 p.m. Joe Chicurel, Chairman Minutes approved [ 1 as presented OR [ 1 as amended ON [ 1 date 3 Agenda item#6a Page 1 of 1 Agnoli, Barber& Brundage, Inc Engineer's Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost Febuary 5th, 2019 PN: 18-0086 Note:Sidewalk lengths are based on Collier County PELICAN BAY SIDEWALK GIS information,other quantities are based on ABB field collected GIS. Costs and Quantites are for (Repair Seagate Drive) rough budgeting purposes only and are not based on survey data. Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Total Cost Cost 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $205,000.00 $205,000.00 2 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS 1 $225,000.00 $225,000.00 3 DEMOLITION-ASPHALT SIDEWALK SY 38,771 $3.50 $135,699.28 4 DEMOLITION-CONCRETE SIDEWALK SY 5,168 $25.00 $129,200.00 5 DEMOLITION-CLEARING AND GRUBBING(SHRUBS,SOD,MISC.) SY 15,126 $10.00 $151,260.00 6 REGRADING AREA(Demolition,Earthwork,Curbing,Sod&Landscape) LF 640 $100.00 $63,980.14 7 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL OAK EA 6 $1,700.00 $10,200.00 8 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL SABAL EA 5 $600.00 $3,000.00 9 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL PINE EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 10 DEMOLITION-TREE REMOVAL MAHOGANY EA 1 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 11 ADA COMPLIANT DETECTABLE WARNINGS EA 168 $250.00 $42,000.00 12 PAVERS-RESTORATION AT CROSSWALKS EA 70 $5,000.00 $350,000.00 13 CONCRETE-2'VALLEY GU II ER(50'per each crosswalk) LF 5,950 $20.00 $119,000.00 14 CONCRETE-6"THICK SIDEWALK SY 43,939 $44.00 $1,933,325.78 15 REGULATORY SIGNAGE-R1-1 EA 116 $1,000.00 $116,000.00 16 THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING,STD,WHITE,SOLID-6"WIDTH(50'per each crosswalk) LF 5,950 $3.00 $17,850.00 17 THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING,STD,WHITE,SOLID-24"WIDTH(15'per each crosswalk LF 1,800 $12.00 $21,600.00 18 LANDSCAPE-RELOCATE EXSTING IRRIGATION LS 1 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 19 LANDSCAPE-RESTORE SOD(6'x sidewalk length) SY 45,650 $5.00 $228,250.00 20 ADJUST ELECTRIC HANDHOLE TOP TO GRADE EA 12 $1,000.00 $12,000.00 21 ADJUST IRRIGATION VALVE BOX TO GRADE EA 101 $250.00 $25,250.00 22 ADJUST MISC UTILITY CONFLICT EA 17 $1,500.00 $25,500.00 23 MISC CONFLICT EA 107 $1,000.00 $107,000.00 24 RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANT EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 25 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LF 139,950 $1.50 $209,925.00 26 ROOT REMOVAL EA 93 $800.00 $74,400.00 27 BIO-BARRIER ROOT CONTROL EA 93 $400.00 $37,200.00 28 REPLACEMENT TREES EA 15 $2,000.00 $30,000.00 TOTAL $4,527,940.19 SURVEYING(750ft/day*100 days*$1,200k/day) EA 1 $122,400.00 $122,400.00 ENGINEERING EA 1 $82,000.00 $82,000.00 PERMITTING EA 1 $41,500.00 $41,500.00 SURVEY CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT EA 1 $82,000.00 $82,000.00 ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES EA 1 $51,000.00 $51,000.00 ROW PERMIT AND FEES EA 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 20%CONTINGENCY $986,368.04 PROJECT TOTAL $5,918,208.23 Agenda item#6a-1 Page 1 of 3 SheaBarbara Subject: FW: Pelican Bay Sidewalks Our Pelican Bay pathways have been the subject of Services Division discussions for more than three years. We have received many e-mails and letters from residents, many pleading for improvements. We have a number of residents who are"mobility challenged" and have described their condition as being "under house arrest" because they cannot safely and reliably negotiate our sidewalk system. From the sounds of your e-mail,you and I are both fortunate to remain agile and able to enjoy all Pelican Bay has to offer. Unfortunately,our sidewalks belong to all members, both those who are agile and those less so. The Services Division has taken the last two years to engage in comprehensive study of our pathways, including their existing condition,the sidewalk designs and materials which are common to other similar Naples area PUD communities, the legal requirements to achieve ADA compliance,the cost for repairs and/or replacement, hardscape and right-of-way constraints, and many other aspects. All of our meetings have been open to the public and noticed on the PBSD web site and on the Pelican Bay foundation web site.... we have tried to be totally transparent as we explored the various options available to us. Historical Perspective Our pathways were originally placed in asphalt and were intended to be approximately 5' in width (actual width varies from about 4'to 5'). The oldest sections date back to the 1980 time frame and have been resurfaced three times,with progressively less success. The nationally accepted lifespan for asphalt pathways ranges from 20-40 years, depending on location,traffic, and quality of initial installation. It is therefore no surprise that our walks are in failing condition after nearly 39 years of service. The county has continued to make repairs to the most egregious sections of our pathways each year,typically spending about$22k. In 2018,those repairs exceeded$80k. Many of those 2018 repairs are already failing after less than six months of service. Last spring, county representatives walked and inspected virtually every foot of our pathways, accompanied by the chairman of the Services Division. The conclusion was that our pathways are exhausted and need to be replaced. There are indeed some sections which remain serviceable, but those are in the minority. Our pathways are a county asset, placed on county property(in the right-of-way). We have implored the county to replace our aging walkway system, but unfortunately we are attached to the hip with an organization having virtually no budget for pathway replacement. In fact, there are many neighborhoods in Collier County with poor(or no)walkways, all of which are clamoring for similar attention. You can imagine the political position the commissioners would find themselves in if they were to spend virtually all of their sidewalk budget in Pelican Bay and leave the balance of the county naked! Thus the problem remains in our court..... County Lad Development Code At the time our original pathway system was approved (late 1970's), five foot asphalt designs were acceptable. Since that time, many studies have been completed on a national and local level to develop standards for optimum sidewalk systems, including initial and maintenance costs, lifespan, and importantly the imperative that sidewalks serve all of our citizens. 1 Agenda item#6a-1 Page 2 of 3 Asphalt material has proven to have a number of deficiencies. The lifespan is about half of the more common concrete design. The edges of unconstrained asphalt typically fray and quickly reduce the effective width. The ability to construct and maintain asphalt pathways in compliance with ADA requirements is challenging at best. As we speak,the nationally accepted, minimum sidewalk width for bi-directional pedestrian traffic is six feet. The Collier County Land Development Code embraces this new awareness and now specifies that sidewalks in public right-of- ways(all PB walks fall into this category) be constructed from 6"thick concrete with minimum width based on the type of roadway... PB Boulevard and Gulf Park Drive would require six foot minimum width, while so-called local roads such as Ridgewood or Greentree would be allowed minimum widths of only five feet. There are those among us who prefer asphalt walkways and have suggested that Pelican Bay might be "grandfathered" to continue with five foot asphalt walks. This is likely not true, but entirely misses the point. We are a progressive community and should be interested in achieving the most enlightened environment possible, regardless of whether we might identify some loophole which would allow us to maintain an obsolete design standard. I have no appetite to return to B&W television, even though I have fond memories of watching Ozzie& Harriet in B&W with my family. Current Status of Decision The services division moves very slowly, in part to consider all of our member preferences and to be sensitive to unique member needs. Even though we have been working diligently on sidewalk design for over two years,we are still a year or more out from actually beginning any replacement project. Thus far,the Services Division has only an "estimate"from our consulting engineer which forecasts the total project cost,the number of trees which might be vulnerable,and other considerations which would impact any forward plan. That estimate indicates that 18 trees might be impacted.... 9 of which would be hardwood species. Importantly,the estimate also includes$36,000 to replace all impacted trees, one-for-one,with the largest caliper tree which can be reasonably transplanted. The palm tree replacements would be indistinguishable from those removed. As an aside,we have roughly 3600 trees which we are responsible for. Thus,the 9 highlighted trees constitute 1/4 of 1%of our tree inventory. The next step, if we were to proceed,would be to have an official engineering design for the sidewalk system. This would include accurate survey data,accurate identification of actual trees and other hardscape which would need to be relocated and of course, total cost. Final Thoughts Your e-mail made some good suggestions which I will also comment on... Any replacement of our sidewalks would be financed through long-term financing. Thus far,all of the stakeholders seem to have embraced this notion of matching the costs with the users actually benefiting from the improvements. If the original engineering estimates prove to be accurate,the total cost would be slightly less than$6M and be financed over 10-20 years. The county finance department has already been working on a proposal which would meet our needs. Financed over 10 years,the$6M cost would result in approximately$95 per year, per owner. Your suggestion of a partnership with the county is a good one and one that our capable administrator has already been pursuing with the county. You can imagine how much easier it would be to secure a modest chunk of money from the county's General Fund than a very visible capital expenditure exclusively for Pelican Bay. At this time,the negotiations seem to be converging on a county contribution of between $250,000 and $300,000 per year. If this turns out to be the case,the county would therefore be returning about$40 per year, per owner(we have 7615 ERU's over which we distribute all division costs). So the net cost,per owner for new sidewalks would be roughly$55 per year. As the chair of the budget committee, my sense is that most of our owners can handle$55 per year. 2 Agenda item#6a-1 Page 3 of 3 You suggested that the timing for any decision regarding sidewalks be made soon... before summer. With some embarrassment, I must confess that we don't work that fast. The reality is that the only decision which can be made before even next fall would be to proceed with engineering design work. That decision might be made in March and could result in an engineering project easily requiring three months. That would then be followed by several months of review, public meetings,etc. before the decision to solicit actual bid costs could be made. The take away is that you will almost certainly be back in town for Fall 2019 before any final decisions are made. We have already had many public meetings, including at least two where a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation was included in the presentation. As soon as we have an actual proposal/plan from our engineers,we would be in a position for a repeat performance. Just a few final related comments....the Services Division engages in minor trimming of surface tree roots for a number of reasons, including sidewalk intrusion, reduction in mulch circles around trees and to maintain the ability to mow turf. In the past,this trimming has been done with the counsel of contracted arborists. I know of no trees which have been lost due to minor grooming of surface roots. Any issue seems to have a number of interested coalitions, often with opposing perspectives. Surrounding the sidewalk issue are the groups which believe that jogging on asphalt is preferred to concrete,groups which view trees as "sacrosanct", groups which believe that wider walks will simply attract more bicycles and make walking more dangerous,groups which rely on flat/reliable surfaces to safely negotiate,groups with prefer the crisp and pristine look of concrete, groups which prefer the"natural" look of asphalt, "white carpet"groups which object to asphalt tracking in their home.... and more. As your representatives, the members of the PBSD board try to weigh all of the various perspectives, including the legal and liability implications for every decision, all aimed at providing the most satisfying user experience for all members. Personally, I am a fan of hardwood canopy trees and believe that they are an integral part of the PB experience. I also believe that opposing progress towards six foot, concrete sidewalks would constitute little more than tilting at windmills....they are coming our way whether we like it or not. As the sidewalk issue works its way though the system, I intend to put my energy into preserving the maximum number of trees and to insure that replacements restore any lost canopy. You are welcome to call me anytime on cell to discuss this and any other PBSD issue... 239-269-7738. Respectfully, Mike Shepherd 1 3 1 1. Ii 0 U Y telC 3.. C 0 C-) NJ O m .t. a) a 0 ,N6 O m N 1 v v v m o co m o m 0 m o m ) N -4 V 7 VI U 4-1 0 C 0 U QJ N yr , en EN Nm m m Q1 d O m com N .--1 `--1 m on L of N a Om C Q) 0 E2 N - ++ (T U _, I , .Y a) a- oN N 0 N v 3 a C d LNll^ G) +' c 1:3o � VI a > C v>• vU ( 'i m m O m CU o0 CO 01 C C O N 0 N U w ;r. C' d (.1, v) in Ok N m ms O : m ,. m. N con on ;, m 4.1 (711.1,i'4„. II I CO E Via: a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0v o 0 0 0 0 N N C COLON .-I G C by O N C U v N U- > 0) _ > : 0) C yCC N J-+ U CC 42 .b0 L i .i L 0 0 0) 0 0 Q, N ,..u.. Lc) W Q. VI U VI N 444,44 v4 4 v 1-4:v. 0 /1. -;,-*=';:s.'"--‘41*-, - - . f-1 .."-' ...„-- 3 :ci-tet:'' -,„„-,ilaritifireirit '--- ,, r ,... •'',4".. ' irii:iiyi...--, . -sitAziori 4.„-.7.«,:ii-07.••,-.14ii"sti.- -1441rItlnr,ion 'it.:. .: , . ,,,.., . A 4P-A, ,.,,1 4 lA.1/....,...4 t,*rottlthAra• 1,-"' V' ' Alr, j ......tz: . . ,. . . ..... Net.--io-ii.,,..-,-•,-,, ,. ',,,,,,,t ..--- ."'f:t.. 4' • \' rt7' '..-- '"---'•-..-•,•,....,,,,,,,,7 ' ,,. tt-16- •• . 4 — ..;",....7—......71:_.1., L $ ...ao ifiooaii:441-0,-T- •.--.-,—._ ., ..., ,. --A- , ; a , ,A•i 4••*7 .:„, ..., , - ': *-''''- t'‘- )'" t` :'° *#4 ' r1114AN .`141110AF ':*11114i. ' 1 341' .• • - % $ ,,,,44,44,.., it, ,-••• - v$4.' rt. i -t: --' .-‘tt:. ' -- '.' '''.+ '....AA. ' tl' -..,...6.4.- ' •t 4: I'I;' iii; ,'• '--'; ‘.;•''t''•.• i,''. ...* - ..r.,-..4,... %brim,.4.. ' ..1.r.., _ ,,i . - .4.- , , .. , `... .N, ' . #),..P. im.Z. t ...0, ...'4•,,,,,. 2 ...,,_ .".. ' tr- ' ' .,,, I. " •..". .4 ga, i....4 . -.. - . ,„,, a,i - - . , •. c ,'..i- , ..•. • . . ...,,,,q,,,,• tuatom"4" . ...— -to •,... , 4*,:le ''' : - 1 1r - ' _ CD) -4* . ,,.. ' '''' i ' ' • - ' ' ' .''' ar'''''i ,- , (13 „1 i i •, .. -- • i- .L.. • '--' - .1. ' C • a) , ;, .- .... ,. -• . E - „,,,r) . o , . ,. . , s. a) \ , A- • -- -.., , -A. - < 1._ t -, .._ E ,, - . - . , . .. ,. - - -- ' -• ' '''., ,..- .- __ . ,. 03 11', , w . • a) , •I „04 44( • -I' , 'A-k--'4.-3-- ' 4' '1," P I ritt ,.. - . ,„4" ,- - . ..".......i..,,, U) ; • ,,< ....,,,.. - . .... , - -a, 1 4 IN >1 b .4 v v. v• 1 . /- f : , -- I ,,,. . ,,,, - C 4( CZ • ' \•'t' :"'"''''' ' , .,.... . ** a_ .•:.,'"'t . 0 - , . , 1.,14„ 'IT '* .,_ . ilk -,. . -\ 1 -= ‘. ,„, '43V .... - .. . ,• I it. 0 4.' i:,7, -.. . ;am' . , . ‘ - . t . i • ..... .... . V., 1, a .. ._ .. .n. : Mr- .k., ._..,‘ , ,..'4. 71,..:: .6.' i t ., "4:- ...'' , - •- <1.. 4.- , ; ..,...r,i• .irrti....,t-**1. .:i,,,,,,,-‘40„ '4,,,,-,..,, --!-!4-1.-.•- a) a) w ,i-)‘,. „._„--,..-.1 .,--,,,,-. .,.A---1-Nfir„:4, • -, ,-....- um- u) u) 0 - _ r.r (73 CD cif _c -c -c ,- .., — - 1 i'l. -..' .- . 0_ 0- a- - te - , •_--, ,. -. - , dor:** ,_..w.--i.,,,:-:-.--- — -- ,:...,