Loading...
Heritage Bay Agenda 12/06/2018 Heritage Bay Community Development District Board of Supervisors o Edwin Hubbard,Chairman o Justin Faircloth,District Manager o John May,Vice Chairman o Gregory Urbancic,District Counsel o Dennis Gagne,Assistant Secretary o Jeffrey Satfield,District Engineer o F.Jack Arcurie,Assistant Secretary Donna Hunter,Assistant Secretary Regular Meeting Agenda December 6,2018—9:00 a.m. 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Public Comments on Agenda Items 4. Organizational Matters A. Oath of Office D. Gagne-Scat 4; and J. May-Seat 5 B. Resolution 2019-1 Designating Officers i. Supervisor Hubbard Letter 5. Engineer's Report A. Project Summary i. Lake Bank Restoration Project Update—Legal Discussion on Q.E. Insurance ii. Boat Launch Proposal—Opinion of Probable Cost B. Water Quality Report—October 2018 C. Muck Probe Measurement Results D. Lake Sediment Metals Analysis Report 6. Attorney's Report A. 30A/30B Boating Regulations Update B. Proposed Homeowner Letter for Lake Bank 20 Project 7. Old Business 8. New Business A. Lake& Wetland Management Tree Trimming Proposal B. Discussion of Quarry Entrance Street Signal 9. Manager's Report A. Approval of the Minutes of the October 4, 2018 Meeting B. Acceptance of Financials District Office: Meeting Location: 210 N.University Drive,Suite 702 Heritage Bay Clubhouse Coral Springs,FL 33071 10154 Heritage Bay Boulevard 954.603-0033 Naples,FL December 6,2018 Agenda Heritage Bay CDD C. Motion to Assign Fund Balance D. Direct Deposit Form E. Field Manager's Report— 10/26/18 & 11/30/18 F. Environmental Consultant Illinois Pondweed Treatment Memorandum i. Quarry Illinois Pondweed Dialogue G. Lake & Wetland Management Monthly Inspections and Service Reports H. Follow Up Items 10. Supervisors' Reports,Requests,and Comments 11. Chairman's Comment 12. Audience Comments 13. Adjournment The next meeting is scheduled for January 3,2019 District Office: Meeting Location: 210 N.University Drive,Suite 702 Heritage Bay Clubhouse Coral Springs,FL 33071 10154 Heritage Bay Boulevard 954-603-0033 Naples,FL OATH OF OFFICE (Art.II.§5(b),Fla.Const.) STATE OF FLORIDA County of C 0 111 I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, protect, and defend the Constitution and Government of the United States and of the State of Florida; that I am duly qualified to hold office under/the Constitution of the State,and that I�jwill well and faithfully perform the duties of /40,-4ye� i3 y CD/ti!�-e4 /7/ Ur=va/p eD r a<7(-ft../ ,5e,771./-74- (Tit 5t� f%� (Tit e of Office) J on which I am now about to enter,so help me God. [NOTE: If you affirm,you i mit the words"so help me God." See§92.52,Fla.Stat.] I otr- . • Sworn to and scribed before me this .f day of J AirG,,�o�/- La/9. I . r e(i'', J ustin T. f[ ' airclot Signature o' -/icer Administering Oath or of Notary Public '' �' COMMISSION 0 FF190261 tai EXPIRES:January 15,2019 ?A''c- Dr4' :. • WWW.AARONNOTARY.00M Print, Type,or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public Personally Known COR Produced Identification 0 Type of Identification Produced ACCEPTANCE I accept the office listed in the above Oath of Office. Mailing Address: IEKrome ['Office Street or Post Office Box ' . 'ail flet5t For/0‘ 3L42U e atureyS te,Zip Code DS-DE 56(Rev.11/16) OATH OF OFFICE (Art.II.§5(b),Fla.Const.) STATE OF FLORIDA County of Collier I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, protect, and defend the Constitution and Government of the United States and of the State of Florida; that I am duly qualified to hold office under the Constitution of the State,and that I will well and faithfully perform the duties of Supervisor, Heritage Bay Community Development District Yrk,-,- (Title r(Title of Office) on which I am now about to enter,so help me God. [NOTE: If you affirm,yo l .1 ay o t the words"so help me God." See§92.52,Fla.Stat.] _ .Tgnature - C �! rr �'y1 =Justin T. Fairclath Sworn to and subscribed before me this / of GiD 40 /' COMMISSION M FF190261 '* +¢ EXPIRES:January 15,2019 Signatu of Officer Administering Oath or of Notary Public ',e'� WWW.AARONNO1ARY.COM J !N!!Il c iiv Print, Type,or Stamp Commissioned Name ofNotary Public Personally Known Vg----OR Produced Identification ❑ Type of Identification Produced ACCEPTANCE I accept the office listed in the above Oath of Office. Mailing Address: Ei Home 0 Office 10042 Lions Bay Court 9 en,is P. Gagne Street or Post Office Box P nt Name AprNaples, FL, 34120 City,State,Zip Code S',ature DS-DE 56(Rev.11/16) Dear Supervisors I have been honored serving the CDD,and the Club,as Chairman since 2014. At the time i was nominated I was serving as Secretary. I am proud of all that we have accomplished, both past boards as well as our current Supervisors. In particular I feel we have all represented the Club in a very professional manner during this past year as we made our way through the heavy rains and hurricane Irma,hired a very responsible contractor for some pretty significant lake bank stabilization projects and achieved very favorable bond ratings and sales while minimizing the overall assessments to our homeowners.Our stature as a vital arm to our community responsible for the function of the SWMS and for the maintenance of our lakes and lake banks has not gone unnoticed. And,our visibility has grown through informational sessions requested and sponsored by the HB Boards which have been very well received,and appreciated. The purpose of this email to the four of you is simple;I am expressing my interest in continuing as Chairman of the CDD and would appreciate your understanding and support. I wish to continue developing the good will that we have established with our neighbors at The Quarry and the Umbrella Association, to better understand our lakes and their makeup to ensure their long term functionality and viability,to continue to develop and utilize forward thinking and planning as we assess our current lake bank conditions and develop long term solutions,to continue to foster the strong relationship we have developed with the Community Association and golf staff,and strengthening our relationship with our management company,Inframark. I hope you will support my interest in remaining as Chair. As you know, I spend a great deal of time doing what I truly enjoy;overseeing this vital function for our Club while adding value to our Club. I respect each of you and what you bring to our Board and sincerely recognize your support, involvement and understanding of the tasks at hand. Thank you very much.Ed RESOLUTION 2019-1 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING OFFICERS OF HERITAGE BAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors of Heritage Bay Community Development District at a regular business meeting held on December 6, 2018 desires to appoint the below recited persons to the offices specified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF HERITAGE BAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT: I. The following persons were appointed to the offices shown,to wit: ) �� , i,„,°,& yt,,i ,tir X( Chairman Jo A 7, Vice Chairman Justin Faircloth Secretary Stephen Bloom Treasurer Alan Baldwin Assistant Treasurer ,)mac- � (�• , Assistant Secretary RA, ✓t;;>y Ga. Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS,6th DAY OF DECEMBER,2018. Chairman -cretary From:Greg Urbancic[mailto:gurbancic@cyklawfirm.com] Sent:Tuesday,December 4,2018 8:31 AM To:Faircloth,Justin<Justin.Faircloth@inframark.com> Subject:RE: Heritage Bay CDD Lake 20 and Lake 30A Certificates of Insurance Justin- I took a look at the certificates. Based on our review of QE's COI and the contract requirements,QE's insurance does not exactly line up with the required$2,000,000 per occurrence limit under its commercial general liability policy or the required$2,000,000 combined single limit under its automobile liability policy. I noted below QE's response to this was that they have a$15,000,000 excess liability policy that should satisfy the requirements. It is not uncommon though with contractors for them to have umbrella or excess liability policies. The two types are not the same but operate somewhat similarly. Excess liability policies provide coverage above the limits of the underlying coverage,but provide no broader protection than the existing policy. From a practical perspective,without reviewing the terms of the underlying policies,it is impossible to know what items are included or not included. With that said,even reviewing a policy may not help because they are massive legal documents that are difficult to follow without a specific fact pattern. Reviewing policies is not customarily done,which is why typically we would look to there being a reputable insurer. I would say it is not unreasonable to accept coverage with an umbrella or excess liability policy and see it frequently done in construction contracts. We will likely continue to see more of this as the insurance industry evolves and companies look for the best pricing. Gregory L. Urbancic Attorney at Law Coleman; Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. The Northern Trust Building 4001 Tarniami Trail North, Suite 300 cyK Naples, Florida 34103 P: 239.435.3535 I F: 239.435.1218 qurbancic(c�cyklawfirm_com COLEMAN t,, . ' , i��ba j"4 ��. `'; i �,ivy l,'��r Visit cyklawfirm.com to learn more about us. Both Gregory L. Urbancic and Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. intend that this message be used exclusively by the addressee(s). This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Unauthorized disclosure or use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,please permanently dispose of the original message and notify Gregory L.Urbancic immediately at ourbancic(tcvklawfirm.com or(239)435- 3535. Thank you. From:Faircloth,Justin<Justin.Faircloth@inframark.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 27,2018 2:35 PM To:Greg Urbancic<gurbancic@cyklawfirm.com> Subject:FW: Heritage Bay CDD Lake 20 and Lake 30A Certificates of Insurance Greg, I just left you a voicemail about Heritage Bay CDD. I am looking for the proposed homeowner letter for the agenda packet going out tomorrow. Do you have this ready? Additionally, please see the emails below with QE regarding their insurance. Let me know if you are o.k.with their overall liability coverage and if this makes up for anything else missing on their insurance. I plan to discuss this with the Board as well, but would like your take on it. Thanks, Justin Justin Faircloth I District Manager I N FRAMARK INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SERVIftS 5911 Country Lakes Drive 1 Fort Myers, FL 33905 (0)239.245.7118 ext. 306 1 (M)239.785.0675 I www.inframarkims.com SUPERVISORS,PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO ALL AS THIS COULD BE A VIOLATION OF THE FLORIDA SUNSHINE PROVISIONS. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:The information in this email is intended for the sole use of the recipient(s)and may be confidential and subject to protection under the law.If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.If you have received this message in error,please contact the sender immediately and delete your copy from your computer. A4n® DATE(MM/OD/YYYY) LJ CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 8/17/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(les)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME; Marsh&McLennan Agency LLC A Marsh&McLennan Agency LLC PHONE FAX 222 Central Park Avenue, Suite 1340A/C.No.Ext):757-456-0577 (A/C,Not: Virginia Beach VA 23462 ADDRESS: certificates@MarshMMA.com INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE MAIC# INSURER A:American Guarantee and Liability Ins Co 26247 INSURED INSURERS:XL Specialty Insurance Company 37885 Quality Enterprises USA Inc, Quality Environment Co., Inc.&Earth View LLC INSURER C:Zurich American Ins Co of Illinois 27855 3494 Shearwater Street INSURER D:Zurich American Insurance Company 16535 Naples FL 34117 INSURER E:Evanston Insurance Company 35378 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:1641283155 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILTRR TYPE OF INSURANCE SSD DL EVD POLICY NUMBER (ER MMIDDY/YYFF I YYI IMM/DDYYTYYI LIMITS C X COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABILITY Y Y GL0017931103 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000 DAmAGERENTED CLAIMS-MADE X OCCUR PREM SES Ea 0ccurrenCet $300.000 MED EXP(My one person) $10,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 POLICY n Ter LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $2,000,000 OTHER: $ O AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BAP017930903 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 Ca MBNEDINGLE LIMIT $1000,000 X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS ONLYAUTOS X HIRED X NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ _AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) X Comp$1,000 X Goll 31000 $ A j UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR AUC017426604 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 EACH OCCURRENCE $18,000,000 X EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $75,000,000 DED RETENTION$ $ D WORKERS COMPENSATION Y WC017931003 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 X AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N STATUTE I ERH ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNERJFXECUTIVEN NIA E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 OFF ICERIMEMBER EXCL UDE D7' (Mandatory In NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1,030,000 H yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE•POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 B Leased and Rented UM00030180MA18A 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 $500,000 per item $2500 deductible E PclIUHon Liability MMAENV0001065 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 Schedu EgmL on file $2500 deductible Poll$1,000,000 $1,000,000 aggre DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES(ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached If more space Is required) RE:Heritage Bay Lake 20 Heritage Bay Community Development District,its supervisors,officers,agents,employees and volunteers are included as additional insured under General Liability and a Waiver of Subrogation under General Liability applies in favor of the certificate holder for work performed by the named insured for the referenced job and/or contract if required by written contract. The General Liability insurance evidenced by this certificate shall be primary and non-contributory to any other Insurance of the certificate holder if required by written contract.Per the cancellation clause contained in the policies noted on this certificate,the policy provisions include at least 30 days notice of cancellation except for non-payment of premium. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Heritage Bay Community Development District 5911 Country Lakes Drive AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Fort Myers FL 33905 GISAIL fyi. aa,„„Ai% ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD r ® DATE(NMR1DlYYYV) A�coRct CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 8/17/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER,THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: Marsh&McLennan Agency LLC A Marsh&McLennan Agency LLC PHONE.Exrh 757 45fi-0577 1 FAX No ): 222 Central Park Avenue,Suite 1340 EMAIL Virginia Beach VA 23462 ADDRESS: certificates©MarshMMA.com INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC R INSURER A:American Guarantee and Liability Ins Co 26247 INSURED INSURERS:XL Specialty Insurance Company 37885 Quality Enterprises USA Inc, Quality Environment Co., Inc.&Earth View LLC INSURER C:Zurich American Ins Co of Illinois 27855 3494 Shearwater Street INSURER D:Zurich American Insurance Company 16535 Naples FL 34117 INSURERE:Evanston Insurance Company 35378 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:946379221 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSRY EXP TYPE OF INSURANCE NSD sWVD POLICY NUMBER (UBR MMICO/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY1 ADDL LIMITS C X COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABILITY Y Y GL0017931103 7/1/2018 7/12019 EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000 GE TO RED CLAIMS-MADE I X OCCUR PREM SES(Ea occurrence) $300,000 MED EXP(My one person) $10,000 _ PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPUES PER GENERAL AGGREGATE I$2004000 POLICY I X I JEC I_-I LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $2,000,000 OTHER; $ O AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BAP017930903 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 COMaacciBINtlEDenU SINGLE LIMIT $1,3.00.000 _ (E X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ - OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS x HIRED NON-OWNED Per PROPERTY $ _AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY X Comp 51.000 X Coll$1000 $ A UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR AUC017426604 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 EACH OCCURRENCE $15,004000 - X EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $15,000,000 DED RETENTIONS $ D WORKERS COMPENSATION Y WC017931003 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 X STATUTE PER 10TH ATH- ND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECIITIVE Y7 Ni A E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 OFFICER/MEMBEREXCLUDED? I -J (Mandatory In NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1,OOD,000 If yes describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 B Leased and Rented UM0003016OMA18A 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 $500,000 per Item $2500 deductible E Pollution Liability ! MMAENV0001065 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 Schedu Egmt on file 02500 deductible Poll$1,000 000 $1,030,000 awe DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS I VEHICLES(ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached If more space Is required) RE:Heritage Bay COD Lake 30A Heritage Bay Community Development District,its supervisors,officers,agents,employees and volunteers are Included as additional Insured under General Liability and a Waiver of Subrogation under General Liability applies in favor of the certificate holder for work performed by the named insured for the referenced job and/or contract if required by written contract. The General Liability insurance evidenced by this certificate shall be primary and non-contributory to any other insurance of the certificate holder if required by written contract.Per the cancellation clause contained In the policies noted on this certificate,the policy provisions include at least 30 days notice of cancellation except for non-payment of premium. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Heritage� Bay Community Development District 5911 Country Lakes Drive AUTHORI7ED REPRESENTATIVE Fort Myers FL 33905 0.6KlaP' fn. COMA ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD HERITAGE BAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 2018 THIRD QUARTER WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT OCTOBER 2018 Engineer& O Architects nners Surveyors Lan C. ndacapr Architects TraJfiefra ns porta d o n Environmental Scientists Construetinn Management CPH,Inc. 2216 Altamont Ave. Fort Myers,FL 33901 (239)332-5499 2018 THIRD QUARTER WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT HERITAGE BAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 DATA COLLECTION 1 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 2 3.1 Temperature 5 3.2 pH 5 3.3 Dissolved Oxygen 5 3.4 Phosphorus 6 3.5 Nitrogen 6 3.6 Chlorophyll a 7 3.7 Salinity 7 3.8 Conductivity 8 3.9 Summary 8 TABLES Table 3-1 2018 Third Quarter Water Quality Test Results 3 APPENDICES APPENDIX A—FIGURES FIGURE 1A CDD Stormwater Lake System Map (South) FIGURE 1B CDD Stormwater Lake System Map (North) FIGURE 2 Sampling Location Map FIGURE 3 Cumulative Temperature Measurements FIGURE 4 Cumulative pH Measurements FIGURE 5 Cumulative Dissolved Oxygen Measurements FIGURE 6 Cumulative Phosphorus Measurements FIGURE 7 Cumulative Total Nitrogen Measurements FIGURE 8 Cumulative Chlorophyll a Measurements FIGURE 9 Cumulative Salinity Measurements FIGURE 10 Cumulative Conductivity Measurements APPENDIX B—PHOTOGRAPHS OF SAMPLING LOCATIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Heritage Bay Community Development District (CDD) serves the Heritage Bay Community, a gated community located north of Immokalee Road approximately 4.8 miles east of 1-75 in Collier County, Florida. The CDD maintains a complex stormwater management system (System) which serves the community as well as the golf course. The System is comprised of numerous components including swales, gutters, inlet structures, conveyance pipes, control structures and 29 man-made lakes (Figures 1A& 1B, Appendix A). The proper function of each component is vital to managing stormwater as well as the quantity and quality of water in the lakes. The CDD's goal is to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and proper function of the system while maintaining a safe and aesthetically pleasing environment for community residents. As part of the CDD's efforts to manage and maintain the System, CPH was tasked with monitoring the water quality in the community's lakes, including field measurement of temperature, salinity, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and pH. CPH also collected samples for laboratory analysis of Kjeldahl nitrogen, nitrate/nitrite as N, total nitrogen, phosphorus and chlorophyll a to assist in evaluating the current health of the lakes. Changes in these parameters over time can also be used to assess water quality improvement needs and to evaluate the effectiveness of any water quality improvement efforts undertaken by the CDD. 2.0 DATA COLLECTION The field measurements and sample collection were conducted on October 2 & 3, 2018. All samples were collected and analyzed per Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). Samples were collected as grab samples at 1-4 feet from the surface as per FDEP aqueous sampling SOP. The locations of sampling points in each lake are depicted in Figure 2. Grab samples can be taken from shore if open water can be reached and is uninfluenced by emergent 1 vegetation. Disturbing sediments in the immediate area of sample collection was avoided. Samples were taken to reflect stable conditions, avoiding heavy rainfall events and drought. Samples were collected from the photic zone, the surface layer where sunlight can influence growth of plants and algae. The water chemistry parameters sampled are intended to assist with the characterization of conditions in the lakes to evaluate the water quality and its effect on the type of plants that grow in the lakes, the rate of growth, and the suitability of the lakes for fish and other wildlife. 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The 2018 Third Quarter Water Quality field measurements and sample collection were conducted on October 2 & 3, 2018. The results of the field measurements and laboratory testing are presented in Table 3-1. Photographs of the sample sites are provided in Appendix B. The results herein provide a comparison of the water quality results from the July 2016, January 2017, April 2017, July 2017, October 2017, February 2018 and October 2018 sampling events. Data collected in July 2016 included parameters of dissolved oxygen, salinity, conductivity and pH. In January 2017, additional parameters of nitrogen, phosphorus and chlorophyll a were added to the sampling protocol. 2 N E . 111T7T71 W ' 1 e _ Z o eo' 0 4 ? ao '^ a N' c i a L W q 3 `� o E ,tNay a aa o ``' -E-'' z e 1' co '^ �o 0. a P n o 3 D. n A" u O >.a E c 0 8 n t.",I c o.o m '$ v .Ei o -' a N a° . c " .0 c ab3 ro F as oaa Eo, � aov6 CC 2 ° Q o D o m 3 m `e .- ° .g i V, = w e -t V g3 ey4 r° rn o am ga 5- n1 a 'G c C 0 O n H e w . v c a N ao N .. .. m a 3 ' q= I' 3 2 'o T h tg c w m 'e d o, e a .... c o _ E w o nn v m w I 4 O� @j 4 8 3 4 13 ., y' c .2. N " O W vai .E OD R �-0. e a Y j14j4•ua.' WmialWiE 'aWa aW6Iu4aa �' e,aawa 'na >v1 e « Od0\ .i O m 0 O ON1 N A .i N Fp Y m .i .a 0 d ;-iri ri p o ri 0 .4 '-i z o- o 0 0 0 dd o oI 6 N A,..= G Z m O O = = O 0 O O = O E Z E O d d o o O o O •.- 2 c R L. e01 cs1 O .1p A 8 m0op a m v - "' -+ o ci '~ d •-i o ci . o ^ '" 13 L m U E inMmp " H N G a ai 0-4 ^ N uj . 0 M ° E n. vy . s A O O lOQp n Q1 M 0, 111 r 01 .. c "" VI t,-, pg V1 Q r-iVI vmi nLn 'N„ .NI1 111v m -co• ig.c E V Nc +, O I' d N N N N N N N N N N N N NI 0 y . o c o 0 ci 0 0 0 0 ci ci o 0 0 in 0 46 _ _ in NN o p �p p .�{ I L0 8 E n llD W 2 A M tn0 h N M K A A Ll . V N N is: t0 10 /0 0o vi l0 l0 (C Z, E Z 7 E Y N• rl v m 0O1 IA .-I vv LI mp� pv o (o00 O co ar 'i-,9 : : : N N M M Mi O LI N Iv Vi r11 VILri III Ul LnL G t p p o I N co iI E 8 M O 0 "' �i oti 1!i O v• Q Vi y Iv a0 m ro m CO CO0-1 0o CO CO a0 00 m d I— E M `` C 001 v.I N. C > I o 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 CCI COVI .-I N .i .i epi 2 .-I N .i rl .4 .1 ., 'O o S;� N2 o N 11 q O.g• N .i .-I e-I .4 .-1 .I .-I .-I N .-' a a VI t r Z g M OtD II II d O Z S ..4 N `.a 7 lias O y .I IN M a of N m O1 u3 F ------- -------------- # Ia E 'L a a a a 0 a 0 o a a u o aill 0 E E = `o' '� °i o 0 a a - o • Jo $ o Ew a. o ono E . m E �n a o a Y o. m o o ao c v E % ... .3 _ ,a .c c ; e m ,aotmu ! flJ_ S oum i mcEma ¢ i` a v ' .HwEv Z W d 2 y ; tiE o ,r =e 23 L 6,7 as ¢ " ae; n o m o 2,o a as m o o a ao. ° a e Ewa E _arn = c o 'orn t na o ° ° y 1u .` • .ao 0n o % ao a C E o .r, .oo ,a ° e ° p .r ` Eoc• 90 ° rnbaoE2oeoo o •c ° a� rn o o acrn .-0z 'at' E' s8a•83 .8, ¢a t o ¢ ac 0 ° lN ° ny w ' 1I' a. 07. /1'. a '° a h nI cw W aPNx9 x3 C cn i- S ° ri '- ei d d d dd .4 .-I ,..i'i .i o o oo d di Z E N O O. O 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 L O 6 LZ 7 7 g No O. 7 6 7 7 ,m N-� 0 O O 7 7 = 7 Z Z o d d d o •". z C H N N H 01 0.,°3 n .-1 ei ci .--1 O r tD O axa co V ei - .-i .-i O o d e-i .-i e-i ei ri d d d d Ca O Q .S —U M d' N 01 O 10 0 m N N N N N 0 O al N 0 N l!1 '-, Vi a ai M 04 .-1 l0 1n OO CO N a v d 00 d, C Z'' w C ; -o ON NNl 0 140 .M-1 4 0 CC N CC N M V`11 0 .^-1 CO V • a y to V V V V 7 '7 CC V M K V V M M' u° 3 N C O h 'E a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r-1 0) d d d a a d d d 0 o d o a o d d +) 13 y+ 2 v N ° O M Vl k N N U1 t 6pp N a N N 01 l0 01 N r1 O N N N 0 'Q O m lD tD L_ F R 1i 1 Ni M .--1 .--i 4 tri N CC M 10 C l0 l0 N N 1 Q) Z' E r = a v 1n co N m co pNp p01 00 M t° .-1 CC 00 O N CO 0 Q g - N N N N N N N N N od N d N O O d O I co 0.- a. I 0 d roa ' 3n N N n V1 an OD to to Illan toO. �0 to N V7 V7 tri u) v1 Yl in to C dd CO .02 N o$ $ o .`I'-1 g not LI,' `c' nCi N l7 = `.-1° QNl `�' r-I O� N ..i N NI NI NI M 01 01 N ei NI NI NI .0 y 00 00 00 co 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 t .--1 eY ei ei ei N N .� .-1 N e-i H N NI N N N co co co m M M M M M M M M m M m .J EN. 7C0 ��pp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N. N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO VI e-1 ri .� 0 ei 0 N .-) ei N e-I N N H N N N O p N m = G n n n r n n �111u v n E y 1 i 1 N N •--1 •-i • V0! 0 0 a, 1 zL f M p I II Q Z .. N A a u+ to n oA N v^ 7 u Y eeii N N eNi rl e°ii N N N N N N N 3.1 Temperature The temperatures in October 2018 ranged from 26.3 - 31.0°C, which is warmer than expected for this time of year. Temperature is used in analysis of dissolved oxygen values. The temperature measurements in all lakes during the last seven monitoring events are shown in Figure 3, Appendix A. 3.2 pH pH is an expression of the amount of hydrogen ions (H+) in the water. Distilled water has a pH of 7, which has equal amounts of hydrogen (H+) and hydroxide (OH-) ions. In southwest Florida lakes, pH can range between 4.44 and 10.04 with a median value of 7.29 (Romie, 2000). The pH found in the CDD lakes was within the low to normal range for Florida lakes in this region. The October 2018 pH values are very similar to the values from previous monitoring events, ranging from 5.0 to 6.0. The pH of all lakes during the last seven monitoring events is shown in Figure 4, Appendix A. 3.3 Dissolved Oxygen The amount of oxygen that can be dissolved in water depends on several factors, including water temperature, salinity, and atmospheric pressure. On a relative scale, the amount of oxygen dissolved in saturated water will be greater in cooler waters than in warmer ones. Oxygen enters waterbodies primarily by transfer from the atmosphere across the air- water interface and to a lesser extent by the action of photosynthetic organisms. DO levels typically follow a diurnal cycle — higher at the end of the day and lower at dawn. Fish typically require DO concentrations of approximately 5 parts per million (ppm) for optimum health. Exposure to DO levels below 2 ppm for 1 —4 days will kill many aquatic organisms (Wilson, 2014). 5 During the monitoring event in October 2018, DO levels in the lakes ranged from 1.20— 8.73 parts per million (ppm). The observed DO concentrations were normal and sufficient to sustain fish and other aquatic organisms in all lakes except Lakes 17 and 18. The observed DO in Lake 17 was 1.56 ppm and in Lake 18 it was 1.20 ppm. Consideration of some of the other parameters (time of day, water temperature and nitrogen) for these lakes, suggests that the slightly low DO level may have been a temporary condition that occurred overnight. The dissolved oxygen level in all lakes during previous monitoring events is shown in Figure 5, Appendix A. 3.4 Phosphorus Phosphorus is usually not available in the environment. Although natural phosphorus levels in surface water bodies are very low, human sources or activities such as fertilizer application, sewage spills and soil erosion can overload lakes with available phosphorus. Excess phosphorus (even in very small amounts) introduced to a lake provides food for plants and algae and can increase the vegetation growth within a lake and have a negative impact on water quality. The October 2018 sampling results show undetectable levels of phosphorus in all of the CDD lakes. The phosphorus level in all lakes during the last six monitoring events is shown in Figure 6, Appendix A. 3.5 Nitrogen Nitrogen is necessary for many natural biological processes. Excess nitrogen in the lakes can fuel the growth of excess algae or other undesirable plants. The nitrogen levels observed in October 2018 were in the normal to moderately high range for Florida lakes. Lakes 2, 3, 4, 6-9, 11, 18, 19, 20 and 25-29 were in the normal range with nitrogen levels ranging from 0.5 — 1.0mg/L. Lakes 1, 5, 10, 12-17 and 21-24 were in the moderately high range of 1.1 — 1.3 mg/L. The total nitrogen level in all lakes during the last six monitoring events is shown in Figure 7, Appendix A. 6 3.6 Chlorophyll a Chlorophyll a is an indicator of the amount of planktonic algae found in the water column. Elevated chlorophyll a levels are directly correlated with reduced water clarity, odor and the potential for algae blooms. Chlorophyll a values can be expected to rise during the warmer months. During the October 2018 sampling, the chlorophyll a values observed in Lakes 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 26, while typical for Florida lakes, are in the low range of 5.3 - 14 mg/m3. Lakes 4, 5, 7, 13, 14, 16, 23, 25, 27, 28 and 29, were in the medium range of 15 — 25 mg/m3 Lake 22 was in the moderately high range of 26 — 40 mg/m3. Lake 24 had a slightly higher value of 47 mg/m3. The chlorophyll a measurements in all lakes during the last six monitoring events is shown in Figure 8, Appendix A. 3.7 Salinity The salt concentration is usually expressed in parts per thousand (permille, %o) or parts per million (ppm). Water salinity based on dissolved salts classifies a water body into three categories: • Fresh water < 0.05% • Brackish water 0.05-3% • Saline water 3-5% The salinity found in the CDD lakes is within the normal range for man-made freshwater ponds in this region of Florida. In October 2018, salinity was low (0.1 - 0.2 ppt) as expected and similar in all 29 lakes. The salinity measurements recorded in all lakes during the last seven monitoring events is shown in Figure 9, Appendix A. 3.8 Conductivity Conductivity measures the capacity of water to conduct an electric current and indirectly 7 measures the concentration of ionized substances in water. Approximately 80% of Florida lakes have conductivity between 90 and 1000 pS/cm (Hand, 2004). Conductivity values during the October 2018 monitoring event ranged from 317 — 548 pS/cm. These values are in the normal range for man-made lakes in this region of Florida. The conductivity measurements recorded in all lakes during the last seven monitoring events is shown in Figure 10, Appendix A. 3.9 Summary In summary, the 2018 Third Quarter Water Quality Monitoring Event shows: • Lake temperatures were higher than normal for the time of year. • pH values were very similar to the values from previous monitoring events, within the low to normal range for Florida lakes in this region. • DO concentrations were normal and sufficient to sustain fish and other aquatic organisms in all lakes except Lakes 17 & 18. This was most likely a temporary condition resulting from the normal diurnal cycle of DO concentration. During the field sampling event, indications of chronically low dissolved oxygen levels were not observed. • Phosphorus was not detected in any of the lakes. • Nitrogen levels were similar to the previous monitoring events with normal to moderately high levels detected in all lakes. • Chlorophyll a concentrations in most lakes ranged from relatively low to moderately high. Lake 22 had a slightly elevated level of chlorophyll a. • Salinity and conductivity in all lakes were normal for freshwater lakes in Florida and similar to the previous monitoring events. Salinity values were uniform in all lakes with a value of 0.1 or 0.2 ppt. 8 CITATIONS Romie, Kenneth, Water Chemistry of Lakes in the Southwest Florida Water Management District, Resource Management Department, Southwest Florida Water Management District, February 2000. Wilson, P. Chris, Water Quality Notes: Dissolved Oxygen, document SL313, Soil and Water Science Department, OF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date December 2009. Revised August 2014. Hand, Joe, Typical Values for Water Quality Parameters for Florida's Lakes, Streams and Estuaries, Watershed Assessment Section, Bureau of Watershed Management Florida Department of Environmental Protection. October 2004. 9 coo [A) APPENDIX A Figures Heritage Bay CDD 2018 Third Quarter Water Quality Monitoring Report Collier County, Florida LL,I;E.•CI „ HET ACE' DA CFS @OUNDAR{ / - i r lSM€ a .ifs !. ,'. s�j ;',1,-4,14::-.=f;--„:-.,-,-; „,,,,,,,,,&NF"n t .,41'.'-'-,--"';-:!''''' '':. x, .,- I 'r a y a, l''''-'1/4"P{FC'L S RIJCTURE s. . Li! 1 A .+ '�i : , r m r f w- : . s apt < s - - „r ;:s.",i,e,,,4i,,,,,,s.-41,401i-,,.,-(i.:: -,-.. Diaz 413' RCP WETLANDn W Ur} - . ,> i n I( ti - r L .,a:y,t* I I.i t j � ; lift I 4� � 4 ` I �.e �'R4P'� :', £ , t t 4, ''` a'! + [ -LAKE X24 • RCP 3 r �€ ' i • ti-. 24- RCP ae!4•off I, I �. 38' RCP , ' . ...'-',- "2•,': '..„-,..".f.,-,f,'",,t•-•-‘•r-•,7,,f-,„,'•''''M,,,,,....,-.4,0-,,,,,,i4,,d.:••::!•'-'•''-',5,4V",,i, -:'''''-';','" A.--,",---..l';',",4c-;,,i,r 0, \'''%''''r.• ..Ed.,'f4i'-':'.Ir'.*;,,,,f.--rr.:-,tiMz.4:'dFk2 :-.-.-.4'':':-,"t-,',:-F.;::', -..,-,i":..::, .'- tf,-i-,;',-4:,--'*N,,,,-, -ifj(E' !..;.7,`-..) ..- ' '--;‘,/..1 -- I b www RCP b to , ,04 ;' t ''''','-,----403-.4,1":',:.-0 t � 'n.',!'f'''"'":=, ..., "4.x... - i 4 i7 SN I': 2k 1..+ C .+ f ( s LAii • 6''f} c -1 .. C. `7 38 r - 2 �� ..r E n u I . brav a r ,'Ii r r .iJ�/ � .�, -/.,,,:r-::-.3.07„..,.::,..•44:0,1,.. l } • r :x x � n%•'_, , � _l' s s � anP � sFx 4 s ` , I. fl24'�Is i 24 , i2IJ ; z;,o fix stie 9ti�-,:,,,:,:,:,!,:-.4,,,, ,,;-?,-,??,;.,,7 wpb e'R2 r `>a ? x. 0.,. a. i._,. , . . y{ :, 'o.. LAKE #'29= • R� Scale:NA CDD STORMWATER LAKE SYSTEM MAP die• RCP Date:5/25/2017 HERITAGE BAY CDD FIGURE 3 gi: Photo Date:NA Z SECTIONS 13&24,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST 1A E Project No.H13603 SECTIONS 18 8 19,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST a Biologist:AEC GIS RCO COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA 4. ° r t ..a ' ' I ._. Lr. A.c r• :k6ERITACE NAY ar RCP CONTRAIL B1RlICAIIEcan euuranu?r y RCP 4102UNE ., 6td1H'.ri STRUGS't4R>r: +... t- o' /I{L5L6 3r Rfk t j �+'- t 15 ,...s.. f ,..,tv-,,i'ziim,§,-Yo.,,,,-,;-,-- ,.„,,,-,:... _,,,',f',..-ii,41 *iici dli �w wirt till- .t ._.,., ,,,„:4,.i.,,,..„...„,,,,, ...,., 14• , r ee � cc x t r 1t ..- ` - . ,,'•4--, :,,.3 ` 7 t ',7-,-''-'''-S,',..-:.74471' --S";' :, fit.e `1 j.i 4 -e--- I-,t'r nJ C '''. F t 7,,,,,,,,,,,.±.4:'.---7, ,, > ,,,.w� __11 =' -- ..,�... ....:.�__.. 3e RCP ! x10 24' RCP Z4•BCP a E f. it I Scale NA CDD STORMWATER LAKE SYSTEM MAP /'��� Date: NA HERITAGE BAY CDD FIGURE ( (1 I Photo Date:NA/25/2017 Z!1/'�_ SECTIONS 13&24,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST �B a Lf J,�� Project No.H13603 SECTIONS 18&19,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST is Biologist:AED GIS RCO COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA a • SAMPLING LOCATIONS . C LAKE ID - '-;� ��' 1: ,.y ,..fi '3'nom" - s '4.44'::::::72:,,.s ,. «�€ >su.-m a, , ' " • has isiO �, `�m •.3 its e sem , • ` s O i 1 :;,7;1''''' r sa �:` '�y ¢ fT.Ysis$ k,V 'f . •rL BOO# '"7 5µ i iP` y 3 d `4 '^r �\ ,}.,' $$��,, 11� } E.tail 4 4^y Y "S' may :IN �+ •, ,''','"...!.-:,"-•,:,,',,.7,:'‘.. ]py C'x { _ a r. .4' '}l ..,-.--..,,---,,,,,,-.=:,-,'---4,4..- �aZ- ....,��' Y'a•a•Y `. �i C ` ' : "iro '• } °':'-:,--.,...—..1'APPROXIMATE a w ' ,;,` "� ,a , 4 PROPERTY BOUNDARY m - P ; a. � era, � ,,,��z [ u".� 'a . b' a �,� sR • m , ' ,� 4 �€ $ � ?�;� � � �� I ,3���� � "gip a ',..,,:::, .., ,;-,.. ,,,e0.....„.;i11,:„,„..*;:.,g-...„-„,-1.-_,-'-:-.-41:'".-1C0.-.'!'• ,..r,ki;;"!-' '.... .',.'...- ='''.''' ''''" r r o 70 a4" i 'if' :, P 9.�vn.�p f Y .a ani 1.,,t' .. i S '� si,...--1'_ h bA lea ,t a's a' r .rsit ` ' - C^gin ti Al �` � SOS -:,!.tit,-,,,1.-4I- �T�� � 4. P scale:1 1,500' LAKE SAMPLING LOCATIONS MAP /^'� Datec 5/it1/2017 HERITAGE BAY CDD FIGURE 3 1�(rJr S Photo Date:2015 --4 SECTIONS 13&24,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST e Project No.H13803 SECTIONS 18&19,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST 2 I, Bloloptst:AED GIS:RCO N COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA a W n n n 00 c0 Q' 8111 ,11111P ID acsi ,—,_ i I - T u S o i ZQ a I I , ... ' 'zhGAF M....10iat 81.M.�5,^, .efYa,�ez N W Z j I '',-.2-•.',,,•-::•;.. ,^t,.xa" �, (/)Lurn E i I ®,. nl n7 I W .2O .�'- #trtt?'s .ss...,-n, + ,.4..'5,..,; .. x4'5':iww I 0 Z EE O 1 i '11 U O� I ID Q w� f--.; m i w Q 6�U ' H it N Sze IL 2 _ w SI `s,7iste3i; zcu 0.e:'° ; r 1 Lu ZOU • W m .0'• a ,4 , :;;g „4;< 0 > I i. 1 Z Q O i I N �1 J cn F,,°. C. I - v s-FTt,t3- r • ,stt a' r - a O 03 06 1 I CO Z ._ I ; ._ w.ma*asw �zr,.uw - U LU ....v; "' I � I I � ,, , 0 7 ,..j,. mYm�fw o0 0 a � r, ." , y ° .5' A 0 0 0 W 0 a a m o E2 O QQ v o0 0 o c o 0 NNQ 1.1 M N O p u N m 00 illV T Q V n 041-/ d ■ MS i V _. C tL ii ! a w N- 4 w v7'F w .,i3a'ar4 ' S}.;mu�: Z i a, 1 1 D v CL i ICO I oz I LU m . : I O 0 ZO % �� d 1 R1 cn o_, Q >. W a w> _. r� a16111111111011110101,66111, m La z UJ F-- -0 w Nw 71I- Zo s ti r J cr .., 1 2 1- ,..4.4, $ ,0 0 8 1 0 ICO ii in 0 A5 I z U w ,. / 1 i ! , 1 � _N j ! N 7 '')C/ 1• tau' �, ,-;.,,y`A.i "d N N =a zo � um R N Oe. — °'�: :s.i. .4,?.0 r:4-..wF?s t dz", c) is t 2 O x a ar. 7n+ 61 1 CD 0 0 a m 1 - rvfi x. 7 4 [JJ p do ,n .1N o w a � o. II II II S VI S N w • Iv�vssw�e�.w�,.�ay. amu; ry f b I-- Z c W LciCji 0 r7 0 0 f ''`amu iS Cl) of LU ad s-0 � , , o , X > 0, 0 r o a j W � 1 a g°w J W I Q S w..i _' ssaaa: axr..a. ,..., ..,- . ..r..:r ,r.-1 (1) Z V '0 I11 y O ri Co ry °!�,, ..tom 'w>.-„"-+�:,,-w�- ',4S;; N 1 P7 LLI Ii a;•. .:.. :=m saw-si xd-..;•:•'s,..• c` , ;, -tea '4 a 1 I I • ce.: ;x.m .r . & : u O fli CO o I 1 I „..6 8 Q i ( 3 $ .� s r' w a ain v. O 1 :sem• , .,'� ____ 1 0 a o W cioirl Nal = a 1 0 I, rr lL m a t 3 m G M to O u 0 AI II A 111 A I it f I ! I I ` W I m ry ! N i w ^ Z ; • 1 t 7 i '. a Z i i �' CL ° D r, i rn r c ,Q i .. i W o ! , r 0 Z0 1 I (n U o F u_ a , X m W O W FD a COiO WNrjliW = DO r.: # n Q U H 1 w i ` i ^ ti z ' Q O O N I 3 , _ o a ! � I V t ! ,./ -, I I N I _ r) i 1 z 0 ! U) cj# 1 IN I o 0 1 6 i (7 a,,,,,„,:vc _ 4. I N 2 Mo w V i Z o p x 0 1111# I i e. in75 2 Caa`m m o i ^ a . r-2 4 C) 4 O O 4 9 fl NC1111111 3 t1 Z W e ■ . W ; i °J i I _ X' LO . XiI N W A 0 I E ()) co 4 M] f—Z Q ! LU a 2 2 Ii i µ 111 I A O D CO o> W cooQ 2 —o O zc:1 1 Z O ,O W V �LL mr• O m wr 1 X wvz-D Q N W { Y53 i r S i J O I— 1 d LU = d0 _ > 1- cLi D 00 Tr III 2 2 f0 , 1 :so cv 1 U) 1 Z O I0 ,,,,x-.4.,-.044,. 0 1 22 I o ! I c� i co m .0. i N Z m� O 71 = d Q N ik v1 I �^ I Z O f I 1 0 p Vl O UL. 4 a I m o r2 i... .1... .. .1_. _._.. , rc u+ v, e m rr .i O J ai •�r ill `~ N t-1 N re A � • 8 f. g m co s j i ( r I I N i i 0 Z g D I ) '' 'A/ CO I ! z I I j , w = jj w i ..,',. -4W impaimi-. p imrNQ w7 1 ' iQ t1oo 1 �Z °i a cuuriO I jO H W U O W N iTi J { i ! ; = ZU AEI :R > j H O a v - co Q ! ': i J d V j v O Iy N 101 I i z I 0 oi I tm • I m , , 1 1 n I 1 ci U. 1 cO o z I a -Q W NG =a1 Z a Ii # ' joi I v e o g I i s a1 v) oam I F. f,.,, 1 ------i I:2 e M 3 V (QM v�� z a - wy ID ti l' M1 N .1 H iL .4. C1 • •c ti O v O D W Q 2. 0 W ■ i as ■ tlR 11a: [1..... N f�G��rci' w a. .an-R,,m,Amv. N Z • .w.x+rauauu I co• . I— co !• ' I- �€ '`. �� N i w ai • N I m W� 1 w CO z I I Z t9 wF 0 I a w ce tea«,, n w I o { > z<-) QDC I > 2 dI j O • i - N Y D w _ I a VI iii ,�¢ ,, I I I o j z , I • i Iot,.....,......"..`',.....,' N . '; ^ (n i E .mftew maw •,"420,.g4:,.:,:4.4,:r..4.40.:- ....-: N o z° o Q 0 ,. Z O� # N z I i i cYioaa`m . o I t �p t- an a m m Ln N n .'+ in o a ! O 0 Q O 6 6 C o Z' a .. r W G .a A _ 4 ■ fA II @ {L ! ! I N 1- cnr.ry I W 1 O 2 co tv Z d I i ri.e.iaar�. N S LU co 1 N �, ( �e\ ° I ; N CO N- 1 1 Q °ti W ""Qo _ N G CO ZOO I I > ; �� I .. a ,� _F.,. I— UJ1. j I 1 V 0 CO O 1 —Qw v • CC 11 W t4 2 O LU j Y Q 0 co 9 j (13 , a t .. u I C .. d;h m V co V ,:- „!.. uti fz O I 1 s 1 I U, I 3 3N t. o o 1 S 8 8 8 $ o a M N s.� j r (42 I (3 r\II:k1111 43 I 3 0.T ( 0 APPENDIX B Photographs of Sampling Locations Heritage Bay CDD 2018 Third Quarter Water Quality Monitoring Report Collier County, Florida r: Q1.,. : : ' Lake 1 ..rte 44;.rte J' s A---- xf - as ;3 *: .. . Y�. .f' c -" 'ern.. '�-�- Lake 2 , a. Y : t �_ ? �x �� " _ Lake 3 _ t y w G C' 4 -.4,,,,,-..„,,'eC 1 4 Lake 4 � ` , � , '� � "' - �� a 4 8 5 Scale:NA PHOTOGRAPHS Date.10/2912018 AN EXHIBIT 3 Photo Date: HERITAGE BAY CDD T ��� . LLLJJJ SECTIONS 13 8 24,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 28 EAST& a` Project No.H13605 B-'I Biol SECTIONS 18&19,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST ogist:AED GIS:CDM COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA Lake 5 a t [ ,�5 aka` v, I_: It h t I i . ? .'''''...,-,-.,.,"4.. y� -.Fht Lake 6 ;g ,aY ,J i yxaJ �o ,� wa Ash ,^ i 2yF so-d ° A�. 9 te` zSMR 4 `* Lake 7 Lake 8 r ,t t 4 , , Ps Scate:NA PHOTOGRAPHS $ Date:1012912018A ir Photo Date. HERITAGE BAY CDD EXHIBIT ' -'p UUU O ,TONS , 2 & Project No.H13605 N SECTIONSSECTINS 1813&s,24 19,TOWNSHIP 4848 SOUTH,RANGE RANGE 276 EAST EAST B-2 a Biologist'AED GIS'CDM COLLIER WCOUNTY, SHIP FLORIOUTHDA `� 44 Lake 9 w 41 �.� Lake 10 a *1 Mt Lake 11 .::tee, ;e r 4 t;xr Lake 12 9 k 1 Scale NA PHOTOGRAPHS ai Date 10/29/2018 HERITAGE BAY CDD EXHIBIT gp Photo Date ((( SECTIONS 13&24,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST& i Project No.H13605 N SECTIONS 18 R 19,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST B-3 s Biologist AED GIS:CDM COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA s ' , P tart<: - Lake 13k' � � "�`tom` '.-',:',-.,.4.-.;.; =- --!:,--.7,, !, t, f, are'.Lake 14 As`` , '4 ` , ,I,,,,,,,,„:,-, u cif ' � rq�� £ y ;.. } ro1F" ..4.,,,:.,,,,,,,,,...?.:,,,,,,,,,-----k . y .4e'4":-'t: 4j.�,T._ ar' sY d3 a Lake 15>C ,ft� Lake 16 E r.9 R S 8 Scae:NA A PHOTOGRAPHS gp Date.1029/2018 /\\` HERITAGE BAY CDDEXHIBIT Photo Date: // SECTIONS13&24,TOWNSHIP48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST& B 4 Project No.H13605 N SECTIONS 18&19,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST Biologist:AED GIS:CDM COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA �. � P � Lake 17 �. _ `'! bx t tr ' 47.i....,:-. Lake 18 ita'i'-'-.l'-,..:-- 'lit iit ,,,,,„-,',;,-,r,,,,,,,,,--:,-,'4,%!.-t''''.:'•.-°!''' �° Lake 19 Lake 20 F g 2 A Scale NA PHOTOGRAPHS Date:1 012 9/2 01 8 HERITAGE BAY CDD EXHIBIT Th Photo Date: B-S r �� SECTIONS 13 8,24 TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST& Project No.N13605 N SECTIONS 18&1� TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST -01 Biologist:AED GIS:COM COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA Lake 21 • ti Lake 22 ' „ ` g = • ypp�` Y v. 3`� s fi Lake 23 • 4100 Lake 24 s Scale:NA PHOTOGRAPHS Date-1 0129/2 01 8 HERITAGE BAY CDD EXHIBIT Photo Date: gp SECTIONS 13&24,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST& B-6 Project No.H13605 N SECTIONS 18&19,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST Biologist AED GIS:CDM COLDER COUNTY,FLORIDA 44 -,44. 1, , , 441. . , .. -:`,„...., ,--'•,-,'' - ''' - #4,% II 1 Lake 25 :u n Vit: r '•f ' r r "'' ..�� .mss e *„ �.;;; : Lake 26 •�' .` 4r i a%AII ► A '4` § Lake 27 'ita= z.5-' "."-; collD 500 West Fulton Street Sanford,FL 32771 Phone:407.322.6841 MemoFax:407.330.0639 Date: November 1, 2018 To: Justin Faircloth (Inframark)and Dennis Gagne (Heritage Bay CDD) From: Amy Daly, LEED AP Re: Heritage Bay CDD Muck Probe Measurements CPH Job No.: H13611 CPH, Inc. performed tasks to measure the depth of muck in the Heritage Bay Community Development District (CDD) stormwater management lakes in October 2018. The CDD has 30 lakes within its property boundary. CPH measured muck or sediment within the lakes at 47 locations. Twenty lakes proposed for sampling were included in the bathymetric survey conducted by CPH for the CDD (dated 7/31/18). CPH used the bathymetric survey to locate the deepest elevations within the 20 lakes to select muck probe locations. Lakes further downstream in the system located before a control structure where expected to have larger sediment settling. Generally,this assumption was supported by the muck measurements. Stormwater retention ponds are designed to minimize the adverse effects that impervious surfaces have on watersheds. Impervious surfaces(i.e. paved surfaces, buildings, etc.) increase the volume of surface runoff in a watershed because they prevent rain water from infiltrating into the soil.Also, pollutants that collect on impervious surfaces are not filtered by the soil or plants and are conveyed directly to wetlands, rivers, beaches, etc. without treatment. Stormwater ponds help developments meet stormwater regulations by reducing the potential for flash flooding and by removing sediments and other pollutants carried in stormwater runoff. Lake 30 within Heritage Bay CCD was constructed between 1979 and 1995. Heritage Bay was conceptually permitted in 2003. The CDD infrastructure, golf course and all the small ponds were constructed in 2005.As stated above one purpose of the stormwater lakes is to collect sediment before it is discharged to the environment outside of the project boundary. Typically the design and construction of stormwater ponds/lakes takes the collection and accumulation of sediment into consideration. The CDD lakes appear to be functioning as designed and the accumulation of the sediment(muck) has not reduced the effectiveness of the stormwater management facilities. The accumulation of the sediment within the lakes does not appear to be problematic. The CDD should use this information as a baseline and compare results of future muck probe measurement assessments to the October 2018 measurements to monitor the sediment accumulation. Unless there is a significant erosion event or other disturbance to the stormwater management facilities, CPH would recommend conducting the next muck probe measurement event in 10 to 15 years. The data table and graphic of the muck probe measurements and locations are attached. Should you have any questions please contact me. W . r f) h c o r p . c 0 nt Heritage Bay community Development District Muck Probe Sampling — Field Data Sheet Date: 10/24/18 through 10/26/18 Field Personnel: Mike Reigard Lake #of Muck Probes #of Muck Probes in Muck/Sediment Thickness # per scope the field , 1 1 1 0.60' 2 1 3 0.40',0.40',0.50' 3 1 1 0.50' 4 2 3 0.40',0.60', 0.70' 5 1 1 0.50' 6 2 3 0.60',0.60', 0.80' 7 1 1 0.40' 8 1 1 0.70' 9 1 1 0.70' 10 2 2 0.60',0.70' 11 1 1 0.60' 12 1 1 0.60' 13 1 1 0.50' 14 1 1 0.70' 15 1 1 0.70' 16 1 1 0.70' 17 1 1 0.70' 18 1 1 0.50' 19 2 3 0.60',0.90',0.80' 20 2 2 0.70, 0.80 21 1 1 0.60' 22 1 1 0.50' 23 1 1 0.60' 24 2 2 _ 0.60',0.70' 25 1 1 0.60' 26 1 1 0.50' 27 1 1 0.60' 28 1 1 0.60' 29 1 1 0.60' 30 2 7 0.70',0.80',0.90', 0.70',0.80',0.90'.0.70' 30 37 Probe Overall 47 Probe See map (Figurel)for the Muck Probe Lakes Locations Locations Recorded Locations and corresponding muck depth measurements NOTES: Top of the muck started at any resistance felt on rod. Hard bottom was either rock bottom, or the rod stopped with body weight applied. _ , .-----'''."-':---.'"'-''''''''''''''.44.5‘ - � r v,�.' ' s$ , sus r -`.y • Lake ID Numbers ' . � 4,L+ fid ` « Muck Probe Locations with depth of muck .xr...= , yam - �- X *r"n'" `aw.- 0 0 1:1•;)v' '�' F k r., 3 �y� 'r-42::•11( 4 '#rt7�R. :' 4 fV .T"per 7,-,.....,,,,,7:,:",;,..!';,,i;-, § + .. - ,r O Ot a 0'19;-71; 40 �'' ➢ .. +. n 0.~ O 7 - � & ,: 8 , zi ,t ;. t 070 9 _ ,V M leit a APPROXIMATE 0 60` 8 ;— R °O 60 . 9 PROPERTY BOUNDARY ,ro,,:ii';� , ,�> � I , "a`r.-",:1;-• *.? ",' ts'i ° 0,50 s . ° 14 I, .s`, ." ' i 0 Org"0 _ 0 60 j x Y lz'tt a 70 �� .hent ay w4 �",,. ,t; ,i.,:::rt s a r. y .Y'r,.w'1 #- ',,,,O,'14,;,•• , 98aY sT ,�t, :,',;,:',:,11,:4 task x If t &'i ,y i" `'.� '�"'� a c3" • tl 7 f t 14 At:"' R a t; s k t 4 �t s v�' as9 � • r,t �- q@ # '19 'ar.o ax . V }; c • �� $� a O60 -, i a ; t ' .....-.„,,,-,,,,„....e .,..4. . -.4 � • d ': x,71' i ., ,r s,r ., �I'a ., r I. J �- k ''•4 - t, —' '* ''v e,i M I�ti"4FSN 4 V O !O' 70.6 0 ,-....,...,--t..„" '#. r �5: �'- .� -050 22 23 x 2;11r;,,,,,..`----,463:,', s , ,,426 .,, -� 4 1 � I K�, (aay } 1:6 4e $ S.k`'ir a :art '30 B �: . it, 190' (9-14-f.05 CANU _ F �� '' �'�� Y 0.60' 086e � � �� .�,. is I, n a ,o •.en t "'a•' s and he-CISUser rIrt Scale.1"=1100018 FEET N MUCK PROBE SAMPLING LOCATIONS MAP /� Date:10130/2HERITAGE BAY CDD FIGURE ( � Photo Dab',2015 SECTIONS 13&24,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST, \J Project No. 13611 SECTIONS 18&19,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST Biologist'AED Gis:CDM COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA HERITAGE BAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 2018 LAKE SEDIMENT SAMPLING REPORT DECEMBER 2018 Engineers (51 Architects 0 Planners Surveyors f,anA.ccape Architects Traffic/Transportation Environmental Scientists (`(fn tructian Management ' CPH,Inc. 2216 Altamont Ave. Fort Myers,FL 33901 (239)332-5499 2018 LAKE SEDIMENT SAMPLING REPORT HERITAGE BAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 DATA COLLECTION 1 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 2 3.1 Chromium 4 3.2 Copper . . . 4 3.3 Zinc 4 4.0 SUMMARY 5 5.0 CITATIONS 6 TABLES Table 3-1 2018 Lake Sediment Test Results 2 Table 3-2 Sediment Quality Guidelines that Reflect Threshold Effect Concentrations(TEC) 4 APPENDICES APPENDIX A—FIGURES FIGURE 1 Sediment Sampling Location Map APPENDIX B—Laboratory Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Heritage Bay Community Development District (CDD) serves the Heritage Bay Community, located north of lmmokalee Road approximately 4.8 miles east of 1-75 in Collier County, Florida. The CDD maintains a complex stormwater management system which serves the community as well as the golf course. The system is comprised of numerous components including swales, gutters, inlet structures, conveyance pipes, control structures and 29 man-made lakes. The CDD's goal is to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and proper function of the system while maintaining a safe and aesthetically pleasing environment for community residents. As part of the CDD's efforts to manage and maintain the lake system, CPH was tasked with sampling and testing the sediment in six (6) of the community's lakes. 2.0 DATA COLLECTION CPH evaluated the Heritage Bay stormwater lake system and selected 6 lakes for sediment sampling. Lake 5 was selected due to its location adjacent to the golf course and residential land uses and is located upstream of a control structure. Lake 6 was selected as it is also adjacent to the golf course and residential land uses. Lake 10 has a connection with multiple lakes. Lake 13 was selected due to its location adjacent to the CDD maintenance facility. Lake 19 is adjacent to a roadway, golf course, driving range, club house and residential land uses. Lake 19 has a connection with multiple lakes. Lake 20 receives stormwater from the northern part of the development through two different lakes, is connected to multiple lakes and is adjacent to residential, golf course and roadway land uses. Based on their location within the stormwater system, these lakes were chosen in order to best characterize the sediments and accumulated constituents from the various land uses within the community. Sediment samples were collected from Lakes 5, 6, 10, 13, 19 and 20 using a hand corer on October 24, 2018. All samples were collected, preserved and analyzed per Florida 1 Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). The locations of sample collection points are depicted on Figure 1. The samples were analyzed by a FDEP-certified laboratory for the following constituents: sulfate beryllium iron nickel titanium silver calcium potassium lead thallium aluminum cadmium magnesium antimony vanadium arsenic cobalt manganese selenium zinc boron chromium molybdenum tin mercury barium copper sodium strontium 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results of the laboratory testing are shown in Table 3-1. The complete laboratory report is provided in Appendix B. Table 3-1. 2018 Lake Sediment Test Results Results Analyte Units Lake 5 Lake 6 Lake 10 Lake 13 Lake 19 Lake 20 Sulfate mg/Kg 11(I) 19(I) 13(I) U U 14(I) Silver mg/Kg U U U U U U Aluminum mg/Kg 650 640 540 290 310 250 Arsenic mg/Kg 0.54(I) 0.88(I) 0.80(I) 0.12(I) 0.26(I) 0.62(I) Boron mg/Kg 0.68(I) 0.55(I) 0.56(I) U 0.33(I) 1.2(I) Barium mg/Kg 2.8 1.6 1.8 1.2(I) 1.2(I) 4.1 Beryllium mg/Kg 0.031(I) 0.031(I) 0.032(I) U U 0.036(I) Calcium mg/Kg 16000 17000 21000 2900 1300 37000 Cadmium mg/Kg 0.043(I) U 0.043(I) U U U Cobalt mg/Kg 0.20(I) 0.14(I) 0.19(I) U U 0.11(I) Chromium mg/Kg 2.0 _ 2.1 1.8 0.64(I) 0.97(I) 1.3(I) Copper mg/Kg 9.5 7.7 12 0.66(I) 0.90(I) 5.7 Iron mg/Kg 480 840 840 200 390 510 Potassium mg/Kg 31(I) U 23(I) U U 33(I) Magnesium mg/Kg 120 260 430 77 30(I) 320 Manganese mg/Kg 6.4 2.4 3.4 0.86(I) 1.6 14 Molybdenum mg/Kg U 0.21(I) 0.13(I) U U 0.21(I) 2 Table 3-1. 2018 Lake Sediment Test Results (continued) Results Analyte Units Lake 5 Lake 6 1 Lake 10 Lake 13 Lake 19 Lake 20 Sodium mg/Kg 59(I) 36(I) 63(I) 14(I) 10(I) 68(I) Nickel mg/Kg 0.49(I) 0.35(I) 0.40(I) 0.12(I) 0.14(I) 0.33(I) Lead mg/Kg 0.72(I) 0.70(I) 0.57(I) 0.25(I) 0.51(I) 0.51(I) Antimony mg/Kg U U U U U U Selenium mg/Kg U U U U U U Tin mg/Kg U U U U U U Strontium mg/Kg 22 29 49 12 4.0 83 Titanium mg/Kg 3.1 3.5 2.9 2.2 2.2 2.3 Thallium mg/Kg U U U U U U Vanadium mg/Kg 2.6 4.4 4.2 0.97(I) 1.9 3.5 Zinc mg/Kg 2.9 2.3(I) 1.9(I) 1.5(I) 2.3(I) 2.4(I) Mercury mg/Kg U U U U U U (u)=Not detected (I)=The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the practical quantitation limit More than half of the analytes were either not detected in the sediment samples, or were detected in such low concentrations that they were below the practical quantitation limit of the test. This was the case in all sampled lakes for sulfate, silver, arsenic, boron, beryllium, cadmium, cobalt, potassium, molybdenum, sodium, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, tin, thallium and mercury. The following analytes were detected in the sediment of at least one of the sampled lakes: aluminum, barium, calcium, chromium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, strontium, titanium, vanadium and zinc. In contrast to surface waters and ground waters, sediments have no federal or state standards or criteria. In the absence of standards, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection has produced guidance documents to assist scientists and managers in interpreting sediment quality data. A Guidance Manual to Support the Assessment of Contaminated Sediments in Freshwater Ecosystems, Volume Ill- Interpretation 3 of the Results of Sediment Quality Investigations (Ingersoll and MacDonald, 2002), lists the metals in Table 3-2 as potential constituents of concern and provides a Threshold Effect Concentrations (TEC), below which harmful effects are unlikely to be observed (MacDonald et al. 2000a). Table 3-2. Sediment Quality Guidelines that Reflect Threshold Effect Concentrations(TEC) Substance TEL LEL MET ERL TEL-HA28 SQAL Consensus-Based TEC Metals(in mg/kg ow) Arsenic 5.9 6 7 33 11 NG 9.79 Cadmium 0.5 96 0.6 0.95 0.58 NG 0.99 Chromium 37.3 26 55 80 36 NG 43.4 Copper 35.7 16 28 70 28 NG 31.6 Lead 35 31 42 35 37 NG 35.8 Mercury 0.174 0.2 0.2 0.15 NG NG 0.18 Nickel 18 16 35 30 20 NG 22.7 Zinc 123 120 150 120 98 NG 121 TEC=Threshold effect concentration(from MacDonald et al.2000a). TEL=Threshold effect level;dry weight(Smith et al. 1996). LEL=Lowest effect level,dry weight(Persaud et al.1993). MET=Minimal effect threshold;dry weight(EC&MENVIQ 1992). ERL=Effects range low;dry weight(Long and Morgan 1991). TEL-HA28=Threshold effect level for Hyalella azteca;28 day test;dry weight(USEPA 1996). SQAL=Sediment quality advisory levels;dry weight at 1%OC(USEPA 1997). NG=No guideline;DW=dry weight. 3.1 Chromium Chromium was detected in measurable quantity in Lakes 5, 6 and 10. The concentrations, in mg/Kg, were 2.0, 2.1 and 1.8, respectively. This is well below the TEC of 43.4 provided in the guidance document. 3.2 Copper Copper was detected in measurable quantity in Lakes 5, 6, 10 and 20. The concentrations, in mg/Kg, were 9.5, 7.7, 12 and 5.7, respectively. These concentrations are well below the TEC of 31.6 provided in the guidance document. 3.3 Zinc Zinc was detected in measurable quantity only in Lake 5. The concentration was in 2.9 mg/Kg. This is well below the TEC of 121 provided in the guidance document. 4 Other constituents of concern including arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury and nickel were not detected in measurable concentrations in the sediment samples from any of the lakes. 4.0 SUMMARY Sediment samples were collected from six (6) lakes in the Heritage Bay Community and analyzed for the presence of 29 chemical constituents. Three (3) constituents of potential concern, chromium, copper and zinc were detected in the sediment samples. However, the concentration of these constituents was well below their respective threshold effect concentrations, therefore, harmful effects to aquatic organisms or people are unlikely to occur. 5 5.0 CITATIONS EC and MENVIQ (Environment Canada and Ministere de I'Envionnement du Quebec). 1992. Interim criteria for quality assessment of St. Lawrence River sediment. ISBN 0- 662-19849-2. Environment Canada. Ottawa, Ontario. Ingersoll, Christopher G. and MacDonald, Donald D. 2002. A Guidance Manual to Support the Assessment of Contaminated Sediments in Freshwater Ecosystems Volume III — Interpretation of the Results of Sediment Quality Investigations. MacDonald, D.D., L.M. DiPinto, J. Field, C.G. Ingersoll, E.R. Long, and R.C. Swartz. 2000a_ Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19:1403-1413. Long, E.R. and L.G. Morgan. 1991. The potential for biological effects of sediment- sorbed contaminants tested in the National Status and Trends Program. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 52. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Seattle, Washington. pp. 175 + appendices. Persaud, D., R. Jaagumagi, and A. Hayton. 1993. Guidelines for the protection and management of aquatic sediment quality in Ontario. Standards Development Branch. Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy. Toronto, Ontario. 27 pp. Smith, S.L., D.D. MacDonald, K.A. Keenleyside, C.G. Ingersoll, and J. Field. 1996. A preliminary evaluation of sediment quality assessment values for freshwater ecosystems. Journal of Great Lakes Research 22:624-638. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1996. Assessment and remediation of contaminated sediments (ARCS) program. Calculation and evaluation of sediment effect concentrations for the amphipod Hyalella azteca and the midge Chironomus riparius. Great Lakes National Program Office. EPA 905/R-96/008. Chicago, Illinois. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. The incidence and severity of sediment contamination in surface waters of the United States: Volume 1: National Sediment Quality Survey. EPA/823/R-97/006. Washington, DC. 6 @ ° Th APPENDIX A Figures Heritage Bay CDD 2018 Lake Sediment Sampling Report Collier County, Florida .,t:%'a ." . 'i'.I'" "-.1,,j.„,,,,,—,;,,,,7,;„;',1.' 's r 'Ya ''',�" 5 r " °', Lake ID Numbers �, _ d • Sediment Sampling Locations S' SVP ,- ", Y � -. ; 1 . ,: -- ,-. ,-" ..- :-; .-; - Ofi .,:„*':, Tit, ffiV s,w,, ... i i '''!'i';'''‘''"'''.'?":'--, A��.'��" a .�"� � �- a ' �' � Wn • g b.: �� APPROXIMATE '# � � 7::.!.ti �., � , ,..r5 '-' ' PROPERTY BOUNDARY . s x•11 1-0. t %:1� ,•-;,11 ....'''.---i-:.,-3,--•:-:3:1'.:' ..t ` » tin " 41'1' "�l ° 'Asa --� r � ,� � v" . c.1 ' � � 91 4 X112 Li. M =,, 4 j. , :`' •-- t 4 '4'x.3 •,:',',:f." �" _Y s!,,. ? s. } { b ri{d -ti.-t -.� "� daR 13 14 9 : t i � . -•.' Y " .yam." 41 „_r 01, K s� 5 a, 1. '2 ,-.7,,,';1.'.; 7 ¢6-33 ate 1•Y ,,:i.1 t' S { yr gk :" t_, g et r t r '-:-3'333i i pl'1' \ 4 ` .3 . N !I ,•. w t z'` s 1 :. � ��. yrc i �1 '''''' '''.::.* t -.= '' ' ' . Y ,F '19' Trot aha E'. '+� ,� : ti ` rr, 721 € •tom . '��� '''''-':;,,:'::3.'''''''..'";t:';',777:',' ' m c 9 `y6t,�i 4 y Y«r.nYa y `t}24 r L, P s S .u, .ata"-. '� "�'' >&:. p ',, �' 22 13 25 s ' i.;oz6, � c.,, ,,, (9''..'..2„ J ;�%s a its,, �4,51 H ,�!' � a-110.�,. •,r:: �>d' €. P if 1. - '\-,,,•,.,0,.....-"'"4.4. ' A.,''' >t` .. f a SceIe:t"=1100 FEET N SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATIONS MAP /� Date:11/29/2018A HERITAGE BAY CDD FIGURE ^� Photo Date:2015 SECTIONS 13&24,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST, �J Project No.H13611 SECTIONS 18&19,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST Biologist:AED GIS:CDM COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA ogij APPENDIX B Laboratory Report Heritage Bay CDD 2018 Lake Sediment Sampling Report Collier County, Florida I TestAmerica. . ,,.„:,..,,,.. .,„, ., ... ,. ., ,, ,. .,. . , , , , ,., THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. °., TestAmerica Tampa -`fr 6712 Benjamin Road .. _. Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33634 “ Tel: (813)885-7427 _ . � y� TestArnerica Job ID: 660 90428 1 Client Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD -Metals Analysis For: CPH, Inc. 500 West Fulton Street Sanford, Florida 32771 Attn: Amy Daly ,,'". /-144, -- . 4, (),-a----- .. Authorized for release by: off. ,z , `, , „Zoll k A ttc.zz k 'n t: 11/2/2018 11:45:23 AM mit MS Y` 4 N_ «' tI ,� 1 Haukur Gudnason Project Manager II " ,. k<gx404 ,,4,11,11 (813)280-8342 ��� haukur.gudnason@testamericainc.com X404 '" g �� x 0 � ti P tl resultsthroiugh g 4..,.; TOtalAcCess ` M g tP s Ask=--- ` y T h e >^ The test results in this report meet alt 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNl requirements for accredited parameters,exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, Elate.'+ and with written approval from the laboratory.For questions please contact the Project Manager at the a-mail address or telephone number listed on this page. This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory.Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Visit us at: uw testarp ri i corn Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s)as received by the laboratory. Client:CPI-1,Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site:Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Table of Contents Cover Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Sample Summary 3 Case Narrative 4 Definitions/Glossary 5 Detection Summary 6 Client Sample Results 9 QC Sample Results 15 QC Association Summary 18 Lab Chronicle 20 Method Summary 23 Certification Summary 24 Chain of Custody 26 Receipt Checklists 28 TestAmerica Tampa Page 2 of 29 11/2/2018 Sample Summary Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received 660-90428-1 L5 Solid 10/24/18 10:05 10/25/18 10:05 660-90428-2 L6 Solid 10/24/18 10:30 10/25/18 10:05 660-90428-3 L10 Solid 10/24/18 10:50 10/25/18 10:05 660-90428-4 L13 Solid 10/24/18 11:40 10/25/18 10:05 660-90428-5 L19 Solid 10/24/18 12:25 10/25/18 10:05 660-90428-6 L20 Solid 10/24/18 12:05 10/25/18 10:05 TestAmerica Tampa Page 3 of 29 11/2/2018 Case Narrative Client: CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Job ID: 660-90428-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica Tampa Narrative Receipt The samples were received on 10/25/2018 10:05 AM;the samples arrived in good condition,properly preserved and,where required,on ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 1.8°C. HPLC/IC No analytical or quality issues were noted,other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. Metals No analytical or quality issues were noted,other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. General Chemistry No analytical or quality issues were noted,other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. TestAmerica Tampa Page 4 of 29 11/2/2018 Definitions/Glossary Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Qualifiers HPLC/IC Qualifier Qualifier Description _ — -- The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitation limit- U Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. Metals Qualifier Qualifier Description U Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitation limit. Glossary Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. n Listed under the"D"column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis %R Percent Recovery CFL Contains Free Liquid CNF Contains No Free Liquid DER Duplicate Error Ratio(normalized absolute difference) Dii Fac Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit(DoD/DOE) DL,RA,RE,IN Indicates a Dilution,Re-analysis,Re-extraction,or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample DLC Decision Level Concentration(Radiochemistry) EDL Estimated Detection Limit(Dioxin) LOD Limit of Detection(DoD/DOE) LOQ Limit of Quantitation(DoD/DOE) MDA Minimum Detectable Activity(Radiochemistry) MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration(Radiochemistry) MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level(Dioxin) NC Not Calculated ND Not Detected at the reporting limit(or MDL or EDL if shown) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC Quality Control RER Relative Error Ratio(Radiochemistry) RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit(Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference,a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor(Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient(Dioxin) TestAmerica Tampa Page 5 of 29 11/2/2018 Detection Summary Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L5 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-1 Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit DiI Fac D Method Prep Type Sulfate 11 I 28 11 mg/Kg 1 * 300.0-1993 R2.1 Soluble Aluminum 650 28 3.6 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Arsenic 0.54 I 1.4 0.12 mg/Kg 1 r 6010D Total/NA Boron 0.68 I 7.0 0.30 mg/Kg 1 0. 6010D Total/NA Barium 2.8 1.4 0.078 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Beryllium 0.031 I 0.56 0.028 mg/Kg 1 + 6010D Total/NA Calcium 16000 70 21 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Cadmium 0.043 I 0.70 0.040 mg/Kg 1 # 6010D Total/NA Cobalt 0.20 I 1.4 0.072 mg/Kg 1 0 60100 Total/NA Chromium 2.0 1.4 0.10 mg/Kg 1 # 6010D Total/NA Copper 9.5 2.8 0.14 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Iron 480 14 1.7 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Potassium 31 I 140 22 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Magnesium 120 70 2.0 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Manganese 6.4 1.4 0.050 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Sodium 59 I 84 6.2 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Nickel 0.49 I 5.6 0.090 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Lead 0.72 I 1.4 0.20 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Strontium 22 1.4 0.14 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Titanium 3.1 1.4 0.10 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Vanadium 2.6 1.4 0.36 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Zinc 2.9 2.8 0.31 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Client Sample ID: L6 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-2 Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Sulfate 19 I 27 11 mg/Kg 1 # 300.0-1993 R2.1 Soluble Aluminum 640 26 3.3 mg/Kg 1 t 6010D Total/NA Arsenic 0.88 I 1.3 0.11 mg/Kg 1 r 6010D Total/NA Boron 0.55 I 6.5 0.27 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Barium 1.6 1.3 0.072 mg/Kg 1 -0 6010D Total/NA Beryllium 0.031 I 0.52 0.026 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Calcium 17000 65 19 mg/Kg 1 # 6010D Total/NA Cobalt 0.14 I 1.3 0.066 mg/Kg 1 0 60100 Total/NA Chromium 2.1 1.3 0.094 mg/Kg 1 + 6010D Total/NA Copper 7.7 2.6 0.13 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Iron 840 13 1.6 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Magnesium 260 65 1.8 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Manganese 2.4 1.3 0.046 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Molybdenum 0.21 I 1.3 0.14 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Sodium 36 I 77 5.7 mg/Kg 1 0 60100 Total/NA Nickel 0.35 I 5.2 0.082 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Lead 0.70 I 1.3 0.19 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Strontium 29 1.3 0.13 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Titanium 3.5 1.3 0.092 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Vanadium 4.4 1.3 0.33 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Zinc 2.3 I 2.6 0.29 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Client Sample ID: L10 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-3 This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Tampa Page 6 of 29 11/2/2018 Detection Summary Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L10 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-3 Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Sulfate 13 I 26 10 mg/Kg 1 0 300.0-1993 R2.1 Soluble Aluminum 540 25 3.2 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Arsenic 0.80 I 1.3 0.10 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Boron 0.56 I 6.3 0.27 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Barium 1.8 1.3 0.070 mg/Kg 1 6010D Total/NA Beryllium 0.032 I 0.50 0.026 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Calcium 21000 63 19 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Cadmium 0.043 I 0.63 0.036 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Cobalt 0.19 I 1.3 0.064 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Chromium 1.8 1.3 0.092 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Copper 12 2.5 0.12 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Iron 840 13 1.5 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Potassium 23 I 130 20 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Magnesium 430 63 1.8 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Manganese 3.4 1.3 0.045 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Molybdenum 0.13 I 1.3 0.13 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Sodium 63 I 76 5.5 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Nickel 0.40 I 5.0 0.080 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Lead 0.57 I 1.3 0.18 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Strontium 49 1.3 0.12 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Titanium 2.9 1.3 0.090 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Vanadium 4.2 1.3 0.32 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Zinc 1.9 I 2.5 0.28 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Client Sample ID: L13 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-4 Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Aluminum 290 26 3.3 mg/Kg 1 0 60100 Total/NA Arsenic 0.12 I 1.3 0.11 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Barium 1.2 I 1.3 0.072 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Calcium 2900 65 20 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Chromium 0.64 I 1.3 0.095 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Copper 0.66 I 2.6 0.13 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Iron 200 13 1.6 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Magnesium 77 65 1.8 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Manganese 0.86 I 1.3 0.047 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Sodium 14 I 78 5.7 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Nickel 0.12 I 5.2 0.083 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Lead 0.25 I 1.3 0.19 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Strontium 12 1.3 0.13 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Titanium 2.2 1.3 0.093 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Vanadium 0.97 I 1.3 0.33 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Zinc 1.5 I 2.6 0.29 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Client Sample ID: L19 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-5 Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Aluminum 310 28 3.5 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Arsenic 0.26 I 1.4 0.11 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Boron 0.33 I 6.9 0.30 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Tampa Page 7 of 29 11/2/2018 Detection Summary Client: CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L19 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-5 Analyte Resuk Qualifier PQL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Barium 1.2 1 1.4 0.077 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Calcium 1300 69 21 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Chromium 0.97 I 1.4 0.10 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Copper 0.90 I 2.8 0.14 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Iron 390 14 1.7 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Magnesium 30 I 69 2.0 mg/Kg 1 * 8010D Total/NA Manganese 1.6 1.4 0.050 mg/Kg 1 # 6010D Total/NA Sodium 10 I 83 6.1 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Nickel 0.14 I 5.5 0.089 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Totai/NA Lead 0.51 1 1.4 0.20 mg/Kg 1 + 6010D Total/NA Strontium 4.0 1.4 0.14 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Titanium 2.2 1.4 0.099 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Vanadium 1.9 1.4 0.36 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Zinc 2.3 I 2.8 0.31 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Client Sample ID: L20 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-6 Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit Di!Fac D Method Prep Type Sulfate 14 I 30 12 mg/Kg 1 * 300.0-1993 R2.1 Soluble Aluminum 250 29 3.7 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Arsenic 0.62 I 1.5 0.12 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Boron 1.2 I 7.3 0.31 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Barium 4.1 1.5 0.081 mg/Kg 1 0- 6010D Total/NA Beryllium 0.036 I 0.58 0.030 mg/Kg 1 6010D Total/NA Calcium 37000 73 22 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Cobalt 0.11 I 1.5 0.074 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Chromium 1.3 I 1.5 0.11 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Copper 5.7 2.9 0.14 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Iron 510 15 1.8 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Potassium 33 I 150 23 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Magnesium 320 73 2.1 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Manganese 14 1.5 0.052 mg/Kg 1 3 6010D Total/NA Molybdenum 0.21 I 1.5 0.15 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Sodium 68 I 88 6.4 mg/Kg 1 # 6010D Total/NA Nickel 0.33 I 5.8 0.093 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Lead 0.51 I 1.5 0.21 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Strontium 83 1.5 0.14 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Titanium 2.3 1.5 0.10 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Vanadium 3.5 1.5 0.38 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Zinc 2.4 I 2.9 0.33 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Tampa Page 8 of 29 11/2/2018 Client Sample Results Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L5 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-1 Date Collected: 10/24/18 10:05 Matrix:Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids: 72.0 Method: 300.0-1993 R2.1 -Anions,Ion Chromatography-Soluble Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac -- Sulfate 11 I 28 11 mg/Kg * 10/31/1822:11 1 Method: 6010D-Metals(ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Silver 0.27 U 1.4 0.27 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Aluminum 650 28 3.6 mg/Ka 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Arsenic 0.54 I 1.4 0.12 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Boron 0.68 I 7.0 0.30 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Barium 2.8 1.4 0.078 mg/Kg .0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Beryllium 0.031 I 0.56 0.028 mg/Kg # 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Calcium 16000 70 21 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Cadmium 0.043 I 0.70 0.040 mg/Kg # 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Cobalt 0.20 I 1.4 0.072 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Chromium 2.0 1.4 0.10 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Copper 9.5 2.8 0.14 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Iron 480 14 1.7 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Potassium 31 I 140 22 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Magnesium 120 70 2.0 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Manganese 6.4 1.4 0.050 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Molybdenum 0.15 U 1.4 0.15 mg/Kg * 10/26/1813:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Sodium 59 I 84 6.2 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Nickel 0.49 I 5.6 0.090 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Lead 0.72 I 1.4 0.20 mg/Kg M 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Antimony 0.22 U 2.8 0.22 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Selenium 0.52 U 2.8 0.52 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Tin 1.7 U 28 1.7 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Strontium 22 1.4 0.14 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Titanium 3.1 1.4 0.10 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Thallium 0.19 U 1.4 0.19 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Vanadium 2.6 1.4 0.36 mg/Kg 0 10/26/1813:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Zinc 2.9 2.8 0.31 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:59 1 Method: 7471A-Mercury(CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.011 U 0.027 0.011 mg/Kg 0 10/31/18 09:21 10/31/18 15:39 1 TestAmerica Tampa Page 9 of 29 11/2/2018 Client Sample Results Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L6 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-2 Date Collected: 10/24/18 10:30 Matrix:Solid Date Received: 10125/18 10:05 Percent Solids: 74.5 Method: 300.0-1993 R2.1 -Anions, Ion Chromatography-Soluble Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Sulfate 19 I 27 11 mg/Kg 10/31/18 22:24 1 Method: 6010D-Metals(ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Silver 0.25 U 1.3 0.25 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Aluminum 640 26 3.3 mg/Kg 'x 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Arsenic 0.88 I 1.3 0.11 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Boron 0.55 I 6.5 0.27 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Barium 1.6 1.3 0.072 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29118 11:02 1 Beryllium 0.031 I 0.52 0.026 mg/Kg o 10/26/1813:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Calcium 17000 65 19 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Cadmium 0.036 U 0.65 0.036 mg/Kg 3 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Cobalt 0.14 I 1.3 0.066 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Chromium 2.1 1.3 0.094 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Copper 7.7 2.6 0.13 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Iron 840 13 1.6 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Potassium 21 U 130 21 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Magnesium 260 65 1.8 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Manganese 2.4 1.3 0.046 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Molybdenum 0.21 I 1.3 0.14 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Sodium 36 I 77 5.7 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Nickel D.35 I 5.2 0.082 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Lead 0.70 I 1.3 0.19 ing/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29118 11:02 1 Antimony 0.20 U 2.6 0.20 mg/Kg # 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Selenium 0.48 U 2.6 0.48 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Tin 1.6 U 26 1.6 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Strontium 29 1.3 0.13 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Titanium 3.5 1.3 0.092 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Thallium 0.18 U 1.3 0.18 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Vanadium 4.4 1.3 0.33 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Zinc 2.3 I 2.6 0.29 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:02 1 Method: 7471A-Mercury(CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.0094 U 0.024 0.0094 mg/Kg 0 10/31/18 09:21 10/31/18 15:42 1 TestAmerica Tampa Page 10 of 29 11/2/2018 Client Sample Results Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L10 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-3 Date Collected: 10/24/18 10:50 Matrix:Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids: 76.4 Method:300.0-1993 R2.1 -Anions,Ion Chromatography-Soluble Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Sulfate 13 I 26 10 mg/Kg * _..... 10/31/1822:37 1 Method: 6010D-Metals(ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed 1311Fac Silver 0.24 U 1.3 0.24 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Aluminum 540 25 3.2 mg/Kg r 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Arsenic 0.80 I 1.3 0.10 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/1811:06 1 Boron 0.56 I 6.3 0.27 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Barium 1.8 1.3 0.070 mg/Kg -0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Beryllium 0.032 I 0.50 0.026 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Calcium 21000 63 19 mg/Kg Kt 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Cadmium 0.043 I 0.63 0.036 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Cobalt 0.19 I 1.3 0.064 mg/Kg # 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Chromium 1.8 1.3 0.092 mg/Kg * 10/26/1813:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Copper 12 2.5 0.12 mg/Kg 0 10126/1813:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Iron 840 13 1.5 mg/Kg 3 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Potassium 23 I 130 20 mg/Kg * 10/26/1813:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Magnesium 430 63 1.8 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Manganese 3.4 1.3 0.045 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Molybdenum 0.13 I 1.3 0.13 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Sodium 63 I 76 5.5 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Nickel 0.40 I 5.0 0.080 mg/Kg 0 10126/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Lead 0.57 I 1.3 0.18 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Antimony 0.20 U 2.5 0.20 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Selenium 0.47 U 2.5 0.47 mg/Kg -0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Tin 1.5 U 25 1.5 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Strontium 49 1.3 0.12 mg/Kg s 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Titanium 2.9 1.3 0.090 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Thallium 0.17 U 1.3 0.17 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Vanadium 4.2 1.3 0.32 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Zinc 1.9 I 2.5 0.28 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:06 1 Method: 7471A-Mercury(CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed DII Fac Mercury 0.010 U 0.026 0.010 mg/Kg 0 10/31/18 09:21 10/31/18 15:45 1 TestAmerica Tampa Page 11 of 29 11/2/2018 Client Sample Results Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L13 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-4 Date Collected: 10/24/18 11:40 Matrix:Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids: 76.9 Method:300.0-1993 R2.1 -Anions, Ion Chromatography-Soluble Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed DII Fac Sulfate 10 U 26 10 mg/Kg * 10/31/18 23:16 1 Method: 6010D-Metals(ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac I Silver 0.25 U 1.33 0.25 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Aluminum 290 26 3.3 mg/Kg # 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Arsenic 0.12 I 1.3 0.11 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Boron 0.28 U 6.5 0.28 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Barium 1.2 I 1.3 0.072 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Beryllium 0.026 U 0.52 0.026 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Calcium 2900 65 20 mg/Kg 3 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/1811:09 1 Cadmium 0.037 U 0.65 0.037 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/1811:09 1 Cobalt 0.086 U 1.3 0.066 mg/Kg # 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Chromium 0.64 I 1.3 0.095 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Copper 0.66 I 2.6 0.13 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Iron 200 13 1.6 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Potassium 21 U 130 21 mg/Kg ' 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/1811:09 1 Magnesium 77 65 1.8 mg/Kg -0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Manganese 0.86 I 1.3 0.047 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Molybdenum 0.14 U 1.3 0.14 mg/Kg 0 10/26/1813:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Sodium 14 I 78 5.7 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Nickel 0.12 I 5.2 0.083 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Lead 0.25 I 1.3 0.19 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 Antimony 0.21 U 2.6 0.21 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Selenium 0.48 U 2.6 0.48 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Tin 1.6 U 26 1.6 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29118 11:09 1 Strontium 12 1.3 0.13 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Titanium 2.2 1.3 0.093 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Thallium 0.18 U 1.3 0.18 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Vanadium 0.97 I 1.3 0.33 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Zinc 1.5 I 2.6 0.29 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:09 1 Method: 7471A-Mercury(CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dii Fac Mercury 0.010 U 0.025 0.010 mg/Kg 10/31/18 09:21 10/31/18 15:48 1 TestAmerica Tampa Page 12 of 29 11/2/2018 Client Sample Results Client: CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L19 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-5 Date Collected: 10124/18 12:25 Matrix:Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids: 71.5 Method: 300.0-1993 R2.1 -Anions,Ion Chromatography-Soluble Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac i 10/31/1823:55 - 1 Sulfate 11 U 28 1 11 mg/Kg Method: 6010D-Metals(ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac _ - Silver 0.26 U 1.4 0.26 mg/Kg * 10/26/1813:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Aluminum 310 28 3.5 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Arsenic 0.26 I 1.4 0.11 mg/Kg i 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Boron 0.33 I 6.9 0.30 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Barium 1.2 I 1.4 0.077 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Beryllium 0.028 U 0.55 0.028 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/1811:12 1 Calcium 1300 69 21 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/1811:12 1 Cadmium 0.039 U 0.69 0.039 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Cobalt 0.071 U 1.4 0.071 mg/Kg 4/ 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Chromium 0.97 I 1.4 0.10 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Copper 0.90 I 2.8 0.14 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Iron 390 14 1.7 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Potassium 22 U 140 22 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Magnesium 30 I 69 2.0 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Manganese 1.6 1.4 0.050 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Molybdenum 0.15 U 1.4 0.15 mg/Kg < 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Sodium 10 I 83 6.1 mg/Kg ' 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Nickel 0.14 I 5.5 0.089 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Lead 0.51 I 1.4 0.20 mg/Kg r 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Antimony 0.22 U 2.8 0.22 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Selenium 0.51 U 2.8 0.51 mg/Kg r 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Tin 1.7 U 28 1.7 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Strontium 4.0 1.4 0.14 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Titanium 2.2 1.4 0.099 mg/Kg r 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Thallium 0.19 U 1.4 0.19 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Vanadium 1.9 1.4 0.36 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Zinc 2.3 I 2.8 0.31 mg/Kg 0- 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:12 1 Method: 7471A-Mercury(CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac _-_ i 10/31/1809:21 10/31/1815:51 1 Mercury 0.010 U 0.025 0.010 mg/Kg TestAmerica Tampa Page 13 of 29 11/2/2018 Client Sample Results Client: CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site:Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L20 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-6 Date Collected: 10/24/18 12:05 Matrix: Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids: 65.8 Method: 300.0-1993 R2.1 -Anions,Ion Chromatography-Soluble Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed DU Fac Sulfate 14 I 30 12 mg/Kg 0 11/01/1800:07 1 Method: 6010D-Metals(ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Silver 0.28 U 1.5 0.28 mg/Kg # 10/26/1813:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Aluminum 250 29 3.7 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Arsenic 0.62 I 1.5 0.12 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Boron 1.2 I 7.3 0.31 mg/Kg * 10/26/181330 10/29/18 11:24 1 Barium 4.1 1.5 0.081 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Beryllium 0.036 I 0.58 0.030 mg/Kg + 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Calcium 37000 73 22 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Cadmium 0.041 U 0.73 0.041 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Cobalt 0.11 I 1.5 0.074 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Chromium 1.3 I 1.5 0.11 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Copper 5.7 2.9 0.14 mg/Kg -0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Iron 510 15 1.8 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Potassium 33 I 150 23 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Magnesium 320 73 2.1 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Manganese 14 1.5 0.052 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Molybdenum 0.21 I 1.5 0.15 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Sodium 68 I 88 6.4 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Nickel 0.33 I 5.8 0.093 mg/Kg * 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Lead 0.51 I 1.5 0.21 mg/Kg t 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Antimony 0.23 U 2.9 0.23 mg/Kg # 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Selenium 0.54 U 2.9 0.54 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10129/18 11:24 1 Tin 1.8 U 29 1.8 mg/Kg o 10/26/1813:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Strontium 83 1.5 0.14 mg/Kg a 10/26/1813:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Titanium 2.3 1.5 0.10 mg/Kg 0 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Thallium 0.20 U 1.5 0.20 mg/Kg o 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Vanadium 3.5 1.5 0.38 mg/Kg a 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 11:24 1 Zinc 2.4 I 2.9 0.33 mg/Kg i;k 10/26/1813:30 10/29/18 11:24 I Method: 7471A-Mercury(CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.012 U 0.029 0.012 mg/Kg 0 10/31/18 09:21 10/31/18 15:54 1 TestAmerica Tampa Page 14 of 29 11/2/2018 QC Sample Results Client: CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Method: 300.0-1993 R2.1 -Anions, Ion Chromatography Lab Sample ID: MB 680-545669/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Soluble Analysis Batch: 545695 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dii Fac Sulfate 7.9 U 20 7.9 mg/Kg 10/31/1819:36 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-545669/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Solid Prep Type: Soluble i Analysis Batch: 545695 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit 0 %Rec Limits Sulfate 98.4 93.1 mg/Kg 95 75.125 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 680-545669/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Soluble Analysis Batch: 545695 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Sulfate 98.3 93.3 mg/Kg 95 75.125 0 15 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-4 MS Client Sample ID: L13 Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Soluble Analysis Batch: 545695 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Sulfate 10 U 130 128 mg/Kg 34 99 75-125 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-4 MSD Client Sample ID: L13 Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Soluble Analysis Batch: 545695 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Sulfate 10 U 130 128 mg/Kg * 99 75-125 0 15 Method: 6010D -Metals (ICP) Lab Sample ID: MB 660-202924/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 202971 Prep Batch:202924 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Silver 0.19 U 1.0 0.19 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Aluminum 2.5 U 20 2.5 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Arsenic 0.083 U 1.0 0.083 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Boron 0.21 U 5.0 0.21 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Barium 0.056 U 1.0 0.056 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Beryllium 0.020 U 0.40 0.020 mg/Kg 10126/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Calcium 15 U 50 15 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Cadmium 0.028 U 0.50 0.028 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Cobalt 0.051 U 1.0 0.051 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Chromium 0.073 U 1.0 0.073 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Copper 0.099 U 2.0 0.099 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Iron 1.2 U 10 1.2 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 TestAmerica Tampa Page 15 of 29 11/2/2018 QC Sample Results Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 660-202924/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:202971 Prep Batch:202924 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed DiI Fac Potassium 16 U 100 16 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Magnesium 1.4 U 50 1.4 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Manganese 0.036 U 1.0 0.036 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Molybdenum 0.11 U 1.0 0.11 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Sodium 4.4 U 60 4.4 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Nickel 0.064 U 4.0 0.064 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/1810:06 1 Lead 0.15 U 1.0 0.15 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/1810:06 1 Antimony 0.16 U 2.0 0.16 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Selenium 0.37 U 2.0 0.37 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Tin 1.2 U 20 1.2 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Strontium 0.098 U 1.0 0.098 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Titanium 0.071 U 1.0 0.071 mg/Kg 10/28/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Thallium 0.14 U 1.0 0.14 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Vanadium 0.26 U 1.0 0.26 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Zinc 0.22 U 2.0 0.22 mg/Kg 10/26/18 13:30 10/29/18 10:06 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 660-202924/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 202971 Prep Batch: 202924 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit 0 %Rec Limits Silver 50.0 50.1 mg/Kg 100 80-120 Aluminum 50.0 49.4 mg/Kg 99 80-120 Arsenic 50.0 48.0 mg/Kg 96 80-120 Boron 50.0 47.5 mg/Kg 95 80-120 Barium 50.0 49.6 mg/Kg 99 80-120 Beryllium 50.0 49.3 mg/Kg 99 80-120 Calcium 50.0 53.5 mg/Kg 107 80.120 Cadmium 50.0 49.0 mg/Kg 98 80.120 Cobalt 50.0 50.7 mg/Kg 101 80.120 Chromium 50.0 50.1 mg/Kg 100 80-120 Copper 50.0 50.8 mg/Kg 102 80.120 Iron 50.0 52.0 mg/Kg 104 80.120 Potassium 1250 1250 mg/Kg 100 80-120 Magnesium 50.0 50.8 mg/Kg 102 80.120 Manganese 50.0 51.1 mg/Kg 102 80-120 Molybdenum 50.0 50.1 mg/Kg 100 80-120 Sodium 500 500 mg/Kg 100 80-120 Nickel 50.0 49.4 mg/Kg 99 80-120 Lead 50.0 50.6 mg/Kg 101 80.120 Antimony 50.0 51.3 mg/Kg 103 80.120 Selenium 50.0 47.9 mg/Kg 96 80-120 Tin 50.0 50.8 mg/Kg 102 80.120 Strontium 50.0 49.6 mg/Kg 99 80.120 Titanium 50.0 49.5 mg/Kg 99 80.120 Thallium 50.0 47.1 mg/Kg 94 80-120 Vanadium 50.0 47.8 mg/Kg 96 80.120 Zinc 50.0 48.8 mg/Kg 98 80-120 TestAmerica Tampa Page 16 of 29 11/2/2018 QC Sample Results Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCSD 660-202924/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:202971 Prep Batch: 202924 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Ree Limits RPD Limit Silver 50.0 49-2 mg/Kg 98 80-120 2 20 Aluminum 50.0 48.6 mg/Kg 97 80-120 2 20 Arsenic 50.0 48.1 mg/Kg 96 80-120 0 20 Boron 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80-120 2 20 Barium 50.0 48.9 mg/Kg 98 80-120 1 20 Beryllium 50.0 49.0 mg/Kg 98 80.120 1 20 Calcium 50.0 53.3 mg/Kg 107 80-120 0 20 Cadmium 50.0 48.6 mg/Kg 97 80-120 1 20 Cobalt 50.0 50.5 mg/Kg 101 80.120 0 20 Chromium 50.0 50.2 mg/Kg 100 80-120 0 20 Copper 50.0 49.3 mg/Kg 99 80-120 3 20 Iron 50.0 51.9 mg/Kg 104 80-120 0 20 Potassium 1250 1240 mg/Kg 99 80-120 1 20 Magnesium 50.0 51.1 mg/Kg 102 80-120 1 20 Manganese 50.0 50.7 mg/Kg 101 80-120 1 20 Molybdenum 50.0 50.3 mg/Kg 101 80-120 0 20 Sodium 500 499 mg/Kg 100 80-120 0 20 Nickel 50.0 49.1 mg/Kg 98 80-120 1 20 Lead 50.0 50.2 mg/Kg 100 80-120 1 20 Antimony 50.0 50.3 mg/Kg 101 80-120 2 20 Selenium 50.0 48.0 mg/Kg 96 80-120 0 20 Tin 50.0 50.3 mg/Kg 101 80-120 1 20 Strontium 50.0 47.8 mg/Kg 96 80-120 4 20 Titanium 50.0 48.8 mg/Kg 98 80-120 1 20 Thallium 50.0 47.5 mg/Kg 95 80-120 1 20 Vanadium 50.0 47.8 mg/Kg 96 80-120 0 20 Zinc 50.0 48.7 mg/Kg 97 80-120 0 20 Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA) Lab Sample ID: MB 680-545616/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 545922 Prep Batch: 545616 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier PQL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.0075 U 0.019 0.0075 mg/Kg 10/31/18 08:48 10/31/18 13:43 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-545616/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 545922 Prep Batch: 545616 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Mercury 0.227 0.242 mg/Kg 106 80-120 TestAmerica Tampa Page 17 of 29 11/2/2018 QC Association Summary Client: CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis HPLC/IC Leach Batch: 545669 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 660-90428-1 L5 Soluble Solid DI Leach 660-90428-2 L6 Soluble Solid DI Leach 660-90428-3 L10 Soluble Solid DI Leach 660-90428-4 L13 Soluble Solid DI Leach 660-90428-5 L19 Soluble Solid DI Leach 660-90428-6 L20 Soluble Solid DI Leach MB 680-545669/1-A Method Blank Soluble Solid DI Leach LCS 680-545669/2-A Lab Control Sample Soluble Solid Dl Leach LCSD 680-545669/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Soluble Solid DI Leach 660-90428-4 MS L13 Soluble Solid DI Leach E 660-90428-4 MSD L13 Soluble Solid DI Leach Analysis Batch: 545695 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 660-90428-1 L5 Soluble Solid 300.0-1993 R2.1 545669 660-90428-2 L6 Soluble Solid 300.0-1993 R2.1 545669 660-90428-3 L10 Soluble Solid 300.0-1993 R2.1 545669 660-90428-4 L13 Soluble Solid 300.0-1993 R2.1 545669 660-90428-5 L19 Soluble Solid 300.0-1993 R2.1 545669 660-90428-6 L20 Soluble Solid 300.0-1993 R2.1 545669 MB 680-545669/1-A Method Blank Soluble Solid 300.0-1993 R2.1 545669 LCS 680-545669/2-A Lab Control Sample Soluble Solid 300.0-1993 R2.1 545669 LCSD 680-545669/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Soluble Solid 300.0-1993 R2.1 545669 660-90428-4 MS L13 Soluble Solid 300.0-1993 R2.1 545669 660-90428-4 MSD 113 Soluble Solid 300.0-1993 R2.1 545669 Metals Prep Batch: 202924 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 660-90428-1 L5 Total/NA Solid 30508 660-90428-2 L6 Total/NA Solid 3050B 660-90428-3 L10 Total/NA Solid 3050B 660-90428-4 L13 Total/NA Solid 3050B 660-90428-5 L19 Total/NA Solid 3050B 660-90428-6 L20 Total/NA Solid 3050B MB 660-20292411-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 3050B LCS 660-202924/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 3050B LCSD 660-202924/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Solid 3050B Analysis Batch: 202971 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 660-90428-1 L5 Total/NA Solid 6010D 202924 660-90428-2 L6 Total/NA Solid 6010D 202924 660-90428-3 L10 Total/NA Solid 6010D 202924 660-90428-4 L13 Total/NA Solid 6010D 202924 660-90428-5 L19 Total/NA Solid 6010D 202924 660-90428-6 L20 Total/NA Solid 6010D 202924 MB 660-202924/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 6010D 202924 LCS 660-202924/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 6010D 202924 TestAmerica Tampa Page 18 of 29 11/2/2018 QC Association Summary Client: CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Metals (Continued) Analysis Batch: 202971 (Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch LCSD 660-202924/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Solid 6010D 202924 Prep Batch: 545616 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 660-90428-1 L5 Total/NA Solid 7471A 660-90428-2 L6 Total/NA Solid 7471A 660-90428-3 L10 Total/NA Solid 7471A 660-90428-4 L13 Total/NA Solid 7471A 660-90428-5 L19 Total/NA Solid 7471A 660-90428-6 L20 Total/NA Solid 7471A E MB 680-545616/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 7471A LCS 680-545616/2-A Lab Control Sample TotaVNA Solid 7471A Analysis Batch: 545922 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 660-90428-1 L5 Total/NA Solid 7471A 545616 660-90428-2 L6 TotaVNA Solid 7471A 545616 660-90428-3 L10 Total/NA Solid 7471A 545616 660-90428-4 L13 Total/NA Solid 7471A 545616 660-90428-5 L19 Total/NA Solid 7471A 545616 660-90428-6 L20 Total/NA Solid 7471A 545616 MB 680-545616/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 7471A 545616 LCS 680-545616/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 7471A 545616 General Chemistry Analysis Batch: 202929 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 660-90428-1 L5 Total/NA Solid Moisture 660-90428-2 L6 Total/NA Solid Moisture 660-90428-3 L10 Total/NA Solid Moisture 660-90428-4 L13 Total/NA Solid Moisture 660-90428-5 L19 Total/NA Solid Moisture 660-90428-6 L20 Total/NA Solid Moisture TestAmerica Tampa Page 19 of 29 11/2/2018 Lab Chronicle Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L5 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-1 Date Collected: 10/24/18 10:05 Matrix:Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Batch Batch Oil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 202929 10/26/18 09:51 AJG TAL TAM Client Sample ID: L5 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-1 Date Collected: 10/24/18 10:05 Matrix: Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids: 72.0 Batch Batch Oil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Soluble Leach DI Leach 10-07 g 100 mL 545669 10/31/18 09:58 TBH TAL SAV Soluble Analysis 300.0-1993 R2.1 1 5 mL 5 mL 545695 10/31/18 22:11 UI TAL SAV Total/NA Prep 3050B 0.99 g 50 mL 202924 10/26/18 13:30 GH1 TAL TAM Total/NA Analysis 6010D 1 202971 10/29/18 10:59 GAF TAL TAM Total/NA Prep 7471A 0.52 g 50 mL 545616 10/31/18 09:21 PEP TAL SAV Total/NA Analysis 7471A 1 545922 10/31/18 15:39 BCB TAL SAV Client Sample ID: L6 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-2 Date Collected: 10/24/18 10:30 Matrix: Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Batch Batch Dii Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 202929 10/26/18 10:00 MG TAL TAM Client Sample ID: L6 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-2 Date Collected: 10/24/18 10:30 Matrix:Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids: 74.5 Batch Batch DII Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Soluble Leach DI Leach 10.02 g 100 mL 545669 10/31/18 09:58 TBH TAL SAV Soluble Analysis 300.0-1993 R2.1 1 5 mL 5 mL 545695 10/31/18 22:24 UI TAL SAV Total/NA Prep 3050B 1.04 g 50 mL 202924 10/26/18 13:30 GH1 TAL TAM Total/NA Analysis 6010D 1 202971 10/29/18 11:02 GAF TAL TAM Total/NA Prep 7471A 0.57 g 50 mL 545616 10/31/18 09:21 PEP TAL SAV Total/NA Analysis 7471A 1 545922 10/31/18 15:42 BCB TAL SAV Client Sample ID: L10 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-3 Date Collected: 10124/18 10:50 Matrix:Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Batch Batch Dii Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 202929 10/26/18 10:10 AJG TAL TAM TestAmerica Tampa Page 20 of 29 11/2/2018 Lab Chronicle Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L10 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-3 Date Collected: 10/24/18 10:50 Matrix:Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids: 76.4 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Soluble Leach DI Leach 10.14 g 100 mL 545669 10/31/18 09:58 TBH TAL SAV Soluble Analysis 300.0-1993 R2.1 1 5 mL 5 mL 545695 10/31/18 22:37 UI TAL SAV Total/NA Prep 30508 1.04 g 50 mL 202924 10/26/18 13:30 GH1 TAL TAM Total/NA Analysis 60100 1 202971 10/29/18 11:06 GAF TAL TAM Total/NA Prep 7471A 0.51 g 5n ml_ 545616 10/31/18 09:21 PEP TAL SAV Total/NA Analysis 7471A 1 545922 10/31/18 15:45 BCB TAL SAV Client Sample ID: L13 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-4 Date Collected: 10/24/18 11:40 Matrix: Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Batch Batch Dii Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 202929 10/26/18 10:41 AJG TAL TAM Client Sample ID: L13 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-4 Date Collected: 10/24/18 11:40 Matrix: Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids:76.9 Batch Batch Oil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Soluble Leach DI Leach 10.14 g 100 mL 545669 10/31/1809:58 TBH TAL SAV Soluble Analysis 300.0-1993 R2.1 1 5 mL 5 mL 545695 10/31/18 23:16 UI TAL SAV Total/NA Prep 3050B 1.00 g 50 mL 202924 10/26/18 13:30 GH1 TAL TAM Total/NA Analysis 6010D 1 202971 10/29/18 11:09 GAF TAL TAM Total/NA Prep 7471A 0.52 g 50 mL 545616 10/31/18 09:21 PEP TAL SAV TotallNA Analysis 7471A 1 545922 10/31/18 15:48 BCB TAL SAV Client Sample ID: L19 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-5 Date Collected: 10/24/18 12:25 Matrix: Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Batch Batch Dii Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 202929 10/26/18 10:43 AJG TAL TAM Client Sample ID: L19 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-5 Date Collected: 10/24/18 12:25 Matrix: Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids: 71.5 Batch Batch Oil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Soluble Leach DI Leach 10.10 g 100 mL 545669 10/31/18 09:58 TBH TAL SAV Soluble Analysis 300.0-1993 R2.1 1 5 mL 5 mL 545695 10/31/18 23:55 UI TAL SAV Total/NA Prep 3050B 1.01 g 50 mL 202924 10/26/18 13:30 GH1 TAL TAM Total/NA Analysis 6010D 1 202971 10/29/18 11:12 GAF TAL TAM Total/NA Prep 7471A 0.56 g 50 mL 545616 10/31/18 09:21 PEP TAL SAV TestAmerica Tampa Page 21 of 29 11/2/2018 Lab Chronicle Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Client Sample ID: L19 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-5 Date Collected: 10/24/18 12:25 Matrix: Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids:71.5 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 7471A 1 545922 10/31/18 15:51 BCB TAL SAV Client Sample ID: L20 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-6 Date Collected: 10/24/18 12:05 Matrix:Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Batch Batch Oil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 202929 10/26/18 11:46 AJG TAL TAM Client Sample ID: L20 Lab Sample ID: 660-90428-6 Date Collected: 10/24/18 12:05 Matrix:Solid Date Received: 10/25/18 10:05 Percent Solids:65.8 Batch Batch Oil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Soluble Leach DI Leach 10.02 g 100 mL 545669 10/31/18 09:58 TBH TAL SAV Soluble Analysis 300.0-1993 R2.1 1 5 mL 5 mL 545695 11/01/18 00:07 UI TAL SAV Total/NA Prep 30509 1.04 g 50 mL 202924 10/26/18 13:30 GH1 TAL TAM Total/NA Analysis 6010D 1 202971 10/29/18 11:24 GAF TAL TAM Total/NA Prep 7471A 0.52 g 50 mL 545616 10/31/18 09:21 PEP TAL SAV Total/NA Analysis 7471A 1 545922 10/31/18 15:54 BCB TAL SAV Laboratory References: TAL SAV=TestAmerica Savannah,5102 LaRoche Avenue,Savannah,GA 31404,TEL(912)354-7858 TAL TAM=TestAmerica Tampa,6712 Benjamin Road,Suite 100,Tampa,FL 33634,TEL(813)885-7427 TestAmerica Tampa Page 22 of 29 11/2/2018 Method Summary Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Method Method Description Protocol Laboratory 300.0-1993 R2.1 Anions,Ion Chromatography MCAWW TAL SAV 6010D Metals(ICP) SW846 TAL TAM 7471A Mercury(CVM) SW846 TAL SAV Moisture Percent Moisture EPA TAL TAM 3050B Preparation, Metals SW846 TAL TAM 7471A Preparation,Mercury SW846 TAL SAV DI Leach Deionized Water Leaching Procedure ASTM TAL SAV Protocol References: ASTM=ASTM International EPA=US Environmental Protection Agency MCAWW="Methods For Chemical Analysis Of Water And Wastes",EPA-600/4-79-020,March 1983 And Subsequent Revisions. SW846="Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Chemical Methods",Third Edition,November 1986 And Its Updates. Laboratory References: TAL SAV=TestAmerica Savannah,5102 LaRoche Avenue,Savannah,GA 31404,TEL(912)354-7858 TAL TAM=TestAmerica Tampa,6712 Benjamin Road,Suite 100,Tampa,FL 33634,TEL(813)885-7427 TestAmerica Tampa Page 23 of 29 11/2/2018 Accreditation/Certification Summary Client:CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Laboratory: TestAmerica Tampa Unless otherwise noted,all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date Florida NELAP 4 E84282 06-30-19 The following analytes are included in this report,but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which the agency does not offer certification. Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte Moisture Solid Percent Moisture Moisture Solid Percent Solids Laboratory: TestAmerica Savannah All accreditations/certifications held by this laboratory are listed Not all accreditations/certifications are applicable to this report. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date AFCEE SAVLAB Alabama State Program 4 41450 06-30-19 Alaska State Program 10 06-30-19 Alaska(UST) State Program 10 UST-104 09-22-19 ANAB DoD ELAP L2463 09-22-19 ANAB ISO/IEC 17025 L2483.01 09-22-19 Arizona State Program 9 AZ0808 12-14-18 Arkansas DEQ State Program 6 88-0692 02-01-19 California State Program 9 2939 06-30-19 Colorado State Program 8 N/A 12-31-18 Connecticut State Program 1 PH-0161 03-31-19 Florida NELAP 4 E87052 06-30-19 GA Dept.of Agriculture State Program 4 N/A 06-12-19 Georgia State Program 4 N/A 06-30-19 Guam State Program 9 15-005r 04-17-19 Hawaii State Program 9 N/A 06-30-19 Illinois NELAP 5 200022 11-30-18 Indiana State Program 5 N/A 06-30-19 Iowa State Program 7 353 06-30-19 Kentucky(DW) State Program 4 90084 12-31-18 Kentucky(UST) State Program 4 18 06-30-19 Kentucky(WW) State Program 4 90084 12-31-18* Louisiana NELAP 6 30690 06-30-19 Louisiana(DW) NELAP 6 LA160019 12-31-18 Maine State Program 1 GA00006 09-25-20 Maryland State Program 3 250 12-31-18 Massachusetts State Program 1 M-GA006 06-30-19 Michigan State Program 5 9925 03-05-19 Mississippi State Program 4 N/A 06-30-19 Nebraska State Program 7 TestAmerica-Savannah 06-30-19 New Jersey NELAP 2 GA769 06-30-19 New Mexico State Program 6 N/A 06-30-19 New York NELAP 2 10842 03-31-19 North Carolina(DW) State Program 4 13701 07-31-19 1 North Carolina(WW/SW) State Program 4 269 12-31-18 Oklahoma State Program 6 9984 08-31-19 Pennsylvania NELAP 3 68-00474 06-30-19 Puerto Rico State Program 2 GA00006 12-31-18 South Carolina State Program 4 98001 06-30-18* "Accreditation/Certification renewal pending-accreditation/certification considered valid. TestAmerica Tampa Page 24 of 29 11/2/2018 Accreditation/Certification Summary Client: CPH, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID:660-90428-1 Project/Site: Heritage Bay CDD-Metals Analysis Laboratory: TestAmerica Savannah (Continued) All accreditations/certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all accreditations/certifications are applicable to this report. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date Tennessee State Program 4 TN02961 06-30-19 Texas NELAP 6 1104704185-16-9 11-30-18 Texas(DW) State Program 1 1104704185 06-30-19 US Fish&Wildlife Federal LE058448-0 07-31-19 Virginia NELAP 3 460161 06-14-19 j Washington State Program 10 C805 06-10-19 West Virginia(DW) State Program 3 9950C 12-31-18 West Virginia DEP State Program 3 094 06-30-19 Wisconsin State Program 5 999819810 08-31-19 Wyoming State Program 8 8TMS-L 06-30-16• •Accreditation/Certification renewal pending-accreditation/certification considered valid. TestAmerica Tampa Page 25 of 29 11/2/2018 0 o �I L b ? 1 •fi`e E 6o'nnn � o' - c c� O o v ZOadC N!-»,N 2 E U U V P _ C g N C , A 4— m O yym (y] Q V N N rzZi9w sg ° y ,9,u N «�oo m a:a, a aalU7w4.C7z '4Y a 10 d' u i y aeuliwo,}o iegwnN IQlol 8 0 • o criar m oo ta e 1 E E `� a l F o a a n E!' m a n "CI d QQy�� r E N d NO U Q Q y vce 5 E° y w 3 O N ° 'rn - 3 E Sr FL C A v \ U cC O U \\` R a E Q m U r � v 1 _ N C C ° c c g a aiellnS•.(18Z-144%10-005 z .O O c f- TS 0L. 1 tl1L61 00109 Z. 1 0.17 7 .0 1, w U a 5 o° .;:M^', .,ry -tea - „r 9 RI a • cp 5 mC 5 tiNtoto) ,w sPW 0ldPNId► i= /�/ (L -'Y 0 W L /% m 0� ' Q Pp 79 QD L--?ab 07 N N N V ^ U U U y �Y 0 Z. ano6t E u I1 o ✓ ' fr„ 01 F- ���V� a o IF 01 m 1 a C Sap E aOte)EYJ N r o �� ▪ i oU 1 p 41 ‘4.' x ` ' r u0 g E 1 r - 4 r E o A j O o TS O m :' Oa A m 3 ✓ 2 0 20_ s a2 r, w o o n o a c C et 4. u N 8"' 1 .a 7 a 4 v '"cc N O a to o m E c E ? S Q mE - U E - E S IL7 Fm- ra v « _v a � _q z° U , m A c v c p u O a a Q m--, tD t O F- m T = N N C T y G) E m m � 7 7 N m 6 �'- Q� 4p m W n n n m LL M " LL 2 L m m V .�.l,I T Z `nm o -,i,, *situ "�! m N 9 Y O N C N D 6 r N 62 °'o, N V� 1 t{ .'Q^• ° UI ' ? 3 V'0 (0 N ,=,-2 N O a= w o c ^,%' a _ a 2 E 1 1 „A—1 y a > n ,2 g' o ° _ .J U 1— v r a V u Q O V a vii z o) in LL n.v w m a Z in 1,2 V7 _ d O _W CC C rc Page 26 of 29 11/2/2018 U °O �g •� �UJ�O if rC`C. V h . �J.� C ' ariZrvri/li 1,,P ,"p g8Q O SF U > \C" a"z°z"ix."'-Y.ab u $3� Q� o r� `�+ Q., g, Y - L U -t v. r - N m W 1p.n- y Q Z VOa c IO R of❑Q .. H `•S y Vj VV// p1 a ii Y1,5221:i•7 uG1 W W i 43 O[e a ���p111 pp YM t0 1pp V. M V§ dd .i§ 0 a21GOw,,ci:,X_, 8 g 3 n b ,'+u uoQ M�nN mai .- r r G Q G u a - _R 1g0 e � :i 14 1 23 ° E I ME ME1 y E t ,J n ? _ Ig a u y 8 .' Ns g ¢c mil 9 °' II yj fl 3 ip issi t U y EN mLL 7 , „mS y gN [ NM F —' r- A Q ME pE C , :3 0 v U , t,in ° J F ii SnE$ U C ° j p ` m p E � — 379 vy c is' *runs H3Y31'Iaei ia -WA•JJO WC'' X X X X X K a S Q c �. 1D _ t LL lwnol/un».p aue V IlWINtln 1 X X X X x x c q as O c L.a V a $W mss '& a�p 4 ; 0co v Q>, iiiiiJ f L (� N CO 1h CO N g$Q � b b 2 = • ams 3 �2 > W aF--V i geg 0 C p taS i} �0 is N Vy MN Np i c „t- ... C C _ R t CO� �w�w�w�iu�w�w f8 14 III 0 g '$ C m F• $ co m co W co co N rJ S N Q N N £I N 'Q Z' I O K u 3 a O a o O G_ e iii C... . N A O 6�Op O •O (= •- F. 4Q n` N v7 g E g 0C, 6 1d HI I ch 1S ei g 03 s G1 01- v �” p ^SE 0 v : " v To jqj .pp v N 2 O 2 a 2 $ F `c �j -11 . 1) K 5 H c' F - mi '7? �,i o`S ;Oy E y E z s M J N U y a0 as co N N (lV g Est' ° d`�, g 'm e E O p t N yy > mC N N ppO pp pV Qp dp N m QQE G u' 'i cY u Q' a w Em $ S § Ol O1 O� Or ffigL� x �_ �?� T� s a c F G fi a ,t J 2 114E 40 a� 4 1 2 8 OOO�i m t22 2 -..2d Z C m Y r� Ee a N N J § �`i U y F V $ m � ° � ` O K! � R pC TeQ y C � 7 a 6 V y y U 8•n VUl NCI SO W &S N - N J J J J J J Z J C Q g U W K C Page 27 of 29 11/2/2018 i 1 I Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client:CPH, Inc. Job Number:660-90428-1 Login Number:90428 List Source:TestAmerica Tampa List Number:1 Creator:Redding,Charles S Question Answer Comment Radioactivity wasn't checked or is<1=background as measured by a survey N/A meter. The cooler's custody seal,if present,is intact. True Sample custody seals,if present,are intact. True The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. True Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True Cooler Temperature is recorded. True COC is present. True COC is filled out in ink and legible. True COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True yrt Samples are received within Holding Time(excluding tests with immediate True HTs) "' Sample containers have legible labels. True Containers are not broken or leaking. True Sample collection date/times are provided. True Appropriate sample containers are used. True Sample bottles are completely filled. True Sample Preservation Verified. True There is sufficient vol.for all requested analyses,incl.any requested True MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is N/A <6mm(1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. True Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True Residual Chlorine Checked. N/A TestAmerica Tampa Page 28 of 29 11/2/2018 Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client:CPH,Inc. Job Number:660-904281 Login Number:90428 List Source:TestAmerica Savannah List Number:2 List Creation: 10/26118 03:52 PM Creator:Nobles,Terry G Question Answer Comment Radioactivity wasn't checked or is</=background as measured by a survey N/A meter. The cooler's custody seal,if present,is intact. True Sample custody seals,if present,are intact. True The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. True Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True Cooler Temperature is recorded. True COC is present. True COC is filled out in ink and legible. True COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? N/A There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True Samples are received within Holding Time(excluding tests with immediate True HTs) r,A Sample containers have legible labels. True Containers are not broken or leaking. True Sample collection date/times are provided. True Appropriate sample containers are used. True Sample bottles are completely filled. True Sample Preservation Verified. True There is sufficient vol.for all requested analyses,incl.any requested True MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is N/A <6mm(1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. True Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True Residual Chlorine Checked. N/A TestAmerica Tampa Page 29 of 29 11/2/2018 CPH ENGINEERS,INC. Date: 11/29/2018 2216 ALTAMONT AVENUE Heritage Bay FORT MYERS,FL 33901 10154 Heritage Bay Blvd. Phone Number:239-332-5499 Naples,Florida Fax Number:239-332-2955 Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost for Lake 30A Boat Launch **This cost opinion assumes the following general design parameters:12'ramp width.73'ramp length,6"concrete ramp pavement Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS Mobilization 1 Lump Sum $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Survey&Control Layout by Contractor 1 Lump Sum $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Site Preparation 1 Lump Sum $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Materials Testing 1 Lump Sum $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Rip Rap 16 TN $98.26 $1,572.16 Floating Turbidity Barrier 200 L.F. $11 75 $2,350.00 6"-3,000 psi Concrete Ramp Pavement 100 S.Y. $115.00 $11,500.00 6"-3,000 psi Concrete Driveway Pavement 30 S.Y. $115.00 $3,450.00 Concrete Valley Gutter 52 L.F, $40.00 $2,080.00 —Alternative Driveway Pavements(Not Included in Total)** 6"Thick Crushed Shell 13 TN $100.00 $1,300.00 6"Thick#57 Stone 8 TN $110.00 $880.00 Sub Total $31,952.16 CONTINGENCY(10%) I $3,195.22 TOTAL ONSITE CONSTRUCTION COST [ $35,147.38 SITECOST_EST(2) CPH Confidential Page 1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN CPH, INC. @ 0 Th AND HERITAGE BAY CDD, LLC FOR LAKE 30A BOAT LAUNCH IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA October 31, 2018 This Agreement is composed of Part I and Part II. Part I includes details of the services to be performed, timing of the services, and compensations. Part II (attached) contains the CPH's Standard Hourly Rate Table and Standard Contract Provisions, which are the general terms of the engagement between Heritage Bay CDD, LLC, herein after called the "CLIENT", and CPH, Inc., herein after called "CPH". PART I PROJECT DESCRIPTION CLIENT proposed to have designed and constructed, a boat launch for the proposes of lake maintenance on the southeast bank of Lake 30A, located in Collier County, Florida, to include vehicular access from the adjacent roadway and a paved boat ramp with removable bollards to limit access. No docks or seawalls are included in this design. CPH will take the lead role as the project coordinator for the CLIENT, handling the coordination of the other project consultants to assure the timely completion and permitting of the project in a cost effective manner. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. CONSULTANT 1.0 PRELIMINARY DESIGN Based on the CLIENT approved Conceptual Site Plan; CPH will prepare the Preliminary Engineering Plans. The preliminary plans will include the site dimension plan, as well as the preliminary infrastructure design to the proposed site. Plans will be prepared in accordance with the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Storm Water Management will be designed in accordance with the current standards of the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida, and will include the "Best Management Practices" proposed by the South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD). Plans will be supplied to the CLIENT in reproducible form at a suitable scale to fit on a twenty-four inch by thirty-six inch (24" x 36") plan sheet and will be accurate, legible, complete in design, and suitable for submittal to the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida for preliminary review and approval. The plans and data will be reviewed with the CLIENT, prior to submitting the plans to the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida. This task will be performed and billed as a lump sum service. Refer to the Compensation section of this proposal for the proposed fee. CPH, Inc.—FL Page 1 of 9 Rev 4/2016 2.0 FINAL DESIGN Based on the CLIENT approved Preliminary Engineering Plans; CPH will prepare the Final Engineering Plans (Construction Plans). The final plans will include but may not be limited to the following sheets: • Cover Sheet • Topographic Survey(Provided by Surveyor) • Dimensional Site Plan • Grading Plan • Sedimentation/ Erosion Control Plan • Sedimentation/ Erosion Control Details • General Notes, Specifications and Details as applicable Final Engineering plans will be prepared in accordance with the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida, South Florida Water Management District, and Florida DOT. Storm Water Management will be designed in accordance with the current standards of the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida, and will include the"Best Management Practices" proposed by the South Florida Water Management District. Plans will be supplied to the CLIENT in reproducible form at a suitable scale to fit on a twenty-four inch by thirty-six inch (24"x 36") plan sheet and will be legible, complete in design, and suitable for submittal to the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida for final review and approval. The plans and data will be reviewed with the CLIENT, prior to submitting the plans to the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida. This task will be performed and billed as a lump sum service. Refer to the Compensation section of this proposal for the proposed fee. Any modifications to these plans requested by the CLIENT after the plans are prepared for submittal to the Local jurisdiction will be performed as an additional service and billed at the Standard Hourly Rates enclosed. 3.0 PERMITTING Upon receipt of the CLIENT's approval of the respective plans listed above, CPH will prepare the permit applications and support data for the applicable regulatory agencies, including; • Collier County Pre-Application Meeting • Collier County Limited Site Plan Application • South Florida Water Management District Pre-Application Meeting • South Florida Water Management District General Permit Modification If during the feasibility phase, any other agencies are identified as required to approve the project, an amendment to this agreement will be prepared. Unless specifically noted in this contract, no Rezoning, Land Use Changes, or Special Use Permits are included in this task. CPH will coordinate the processing of the applications through the regulatory agencies, including attending a limited number of meetings with the agencies that may be necessary to receive the approval. Within this service are up to two (2) meetings or conference calls with each of the regulatory agencies, one (1) submittal of the applications and supporting documents, and two (2) response to agency comments. In order to minimize travel, meetings with multiple agencies will be scheduled, when possible. Meetings required beyond these will be handled as additional service, and billed in accordance with our Standard Hourly Rates. Should there be a potential for denial on an application, the CPH, Inc. FL Page 2 of 9 Rev 4/2016 CLIENT will be informed so they may make the appropriate arrangements to retain legal staff to address the denial should it occur. The CLIENT will be financially responsible for any application or filing fee required by the agencies. This task will be performed and billed as a lump sum service. Refer to the Compensation section of this proposal for the proposed fee. Any modifications to the plans requested by the Regulatory Agencies pertaining to the infrastructure design in the previously mentioned plans, required to meet code, will be addressed by CPH as part of these services. Any modifications requested that are not code issues, or modifications requested by the CLIENT will be addressed as additional services and billed at the Standard Hourly Rates enclosed. Any other permits that may arise during the design or review process, and not outlined above, will be handled as an additional service, and billed in accordance with our Standard Hourly Rates. 1.1 MEETINGS The following meetings are included in this task: • Project Kick-Off with District Supervisors and Managers 4.0 BIDDING ADMINISTRATION CPH will produce a Request for Proposal (RFP) documents for obtaining single source bid proposals from general contractors and advertise via newspaper. CPH will review bid proposals and develop a ranking system to rank qualified general contractor submittals and will prepare a recommendation summary for the district supervisors and manager for review and approval. CPH will respond to questions from contractors during the bidding period and provide addendums to the bid documents as required for proper plan documentation. This task will be performed and billed as an Hourly Upset Limit(Hourly USL) service. Refer to the Compensation section of this proposal for the proposed fee. Additional services will be charged at our Standard Hourly Rates. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION CPH proposes to conduct the minimum number of site inspections necessary to certify the on-site potable water, sanitary sewer, and landscape installation. For purposes of this proposal, no more than two (2)are included within this scope. 5.1 MEETINGS The following meetings are included in this task: • On-site Pre-Bid meeting with prospective contractors • Pre-Construction meeting with selected contractors This task will be performed and billed as a lump sum service. Refer to the Compensation section of this proposal for the proposed fee. Should additional meetings, site inspections, or extension contractor coordination be required, they will be handled as additional services and billed at the Standard Hourly Rates enclosed. B. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. C. SURVEYING CPH, Inc.—FL Page 3 of 9 Rev 4/2016 1.0 BOUNDARY SURVEY Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. 2.0 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Perform a Topographic Survey as per Rule Chapter 5J-17 of the Florida Administrative Code in compliance with the standards of practice of surveying and mapping of the State of Florida. • Collect topographic data at a 50 foot grid and depth soundings on lakes as depicted within the red area on the attached "Survey Site Exhibit" to include top of silt, top of bank where accessible. • Provide two (2)site benchmarks. • Signed and sealed Topographic Survey. Note: A $1,080.00 mobilization fee will be required for each additional site visit. State Plane: The project coordinate system will be based horizontally on the North American Datum 83(2011) (NAD 83(2011)). The project will be referenced to state plane coordinates by field locating published control points. The National Geodetic Survey control points will be researched and verified in the field. This base of reference will be used to establish the coordinate system for the project. Benchmarks and Control: The project will be based on the National American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). The project will be referenced to these published elevations by field locating published benchmarks. "Survey Site Exhibit" CPH, Inc.—FL Page 4 of 9 Rev 4/2016 Heritage Bay Lakes Boat LaunchpLegend t` float l.airh I el i LOSita �9e.. t. jr A Google Earth —1 Excluding j Excludin 30A I g 30B D. ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. E. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. CPH,Inc.—FL Page 5 of 9 Rev 4/2016 F. LAND PLANNING Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. G. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. H. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. J. BUILDERS SERVICES Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. CLIENT-FURNISHED INFORMATION It is understood that CPH will perform services under the sole direction of the CLIENT. In the performance of these services, CPH will coordinate its efforts with those of other project team members as required. The CLIENT shall provide CPH with project-related technical data including, but not limited to,the following: • Project size, location, identification number, and building program. • Current title commitment and any existing boundary and topographic surveys and plats. If CPH is not performing surveying services as part of the contract, CLIENT to provide current boundary and topographic information in AutoCAD 14 or more recent version, or DXF format. • Previous Environmental investigation reports. • Previous Geotechnical investigation reports. • Master plan or development plans for the overall project. Preferably in AutoCAD 14 or more recent version, or DXF format. • Any other pertinent information concerning this project to which the CLIENT may have access. CPH will rely upon the accuracy and completeness of CLIENT-furnished information in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. CPH will begin performance of the above services upon verbal authorization followed by written authorization within 7 days of the verbal authorization to proceed is received. The schedule is also subject to timely delivery of information by the CLIENT and is exclusive of CLIENT and local review of interim products. If the CLIENT requests that work under this agreement be stopped, the schedule is subject to renegotiation when written authorization to continue is received. CPH, Inc. FL Page 6 of 9 Rev 4/2016 COMPENSATION Labor CPH will perform the Scope of Services contained in this Agreement as identified on each task, either lump sum or time and materials. Refer to the Standard Hourly Rate Schedule to be utilized on this project. The following is the break down of fees for each task. Tasks that are identified as Time and Materials (Hourly) have been provided an `Upset Limit' (USL) budget. The CLIENT will be informed when the services are about to exceed this limit. Phase No. Phase Description Dillino Method Fee A. CONSULTANT 1.0 Preliminary Design Lump Sum $3,200 2.0 Final Design Lump Sum $8,800 3.0 Permitting Lump Sum $6,000 4.0 Bidding Administration Hourly USL $2,000 5.0 Construction Observation Lump Sum $2,800 C. SURVEYING 2.0 Topographic Survey Lump Sum $1,685 Reimbursable Expenses In addition to the labor compensation outlined above, CPH shall be reimbursed directly for project specific expenditures such as, but not limited to travel, printing and reprographics, meals, hotel stay, rental cars, postage, and telephone usage. Reimbursable expenses will be billed at their actual cost, without increase. SERVICES NOT INCLUDED The following services are not anticipated and, therefore, not included in this Agreement at this time: • Expert witness for litigation. • Construction staking. • Environmental studies and coordination of environmental issues with the regulatory agencies. • Geotechnical studies and additional testing required by the regulatory agencies. • Off-site utility analysis and design. • Off-site storm water analysis and design. • Expediting the review process of the permits identified herein. • Any permits not identified herein. • Structural Engineering design of retaining walls. • Structural Engineering design of boat launch. • Change Order preparation. • Pay request review • Review of an alternative product in lieu of the product called for on the plans and specifications. CPH, Inc. FL Page 7 of 9 Rev 4/2016 • Special meetings with agencies, other consultants or CLIENT not normally required to perform the work described in the Scope of Services, except those meetings specifically identified in the above Scope of Work • Special requests by lending institutions or other parties not essential to completing the work described in the Scope of Services • Permitting efforts relating to obtaining variances for the site development including tree issues, setbacks, parking, etc. • Design of hardscape features including but not limited to structures, fountains, lighting, special paving, or signage • Storm water modeling and/or analysis of the existing storm water pond system for retrofitting of the existing site • Traffic studies or signalization design • Easement or right-of-way vacation or dedication services or platting services • Electrical, Mechanical, or Structural Engineering services • Design and permitting of buildings and structures including bridges, retaining walls, etc. • Design and/or permitting efforts associated with the site improvements (paving, grading, drainage, utilities, etc.)for future phases of the project • Services resulting from changes made by CLIENT following the completion of specific project tasks that require re-work by CPH ▪ Wetlands Permitting • Flood Plain Analyses • Site Specific Maintenance of Traffic Plans • Any other issues not specifically described in this proposal Should work be required in any of these areas, or areas not previously described, CPH will prepare a proposal or amendment, at the CLIENT's request, that contains the Scope of Services,fee, and schedule required to complete the additional work item. CPH, INC. ' T- ORIZATION By: -- Daniel P. Moyer, P.E. Vice President Date: 10/31/18 CLIENT AUTHORIZATION Heritage Bay CDD, LLC agrees with Part I which includes the Scope of Services and Compensation Schedule. Part II contains CPH's Standard Contract Provisions referenced as Exhibit A and CPH's Standard Hourly Rate Schedule referenced as Exhibit B (attached hereto and acknowledged as being received). Together they constitute the entire Agreement between CPH, Inc. and Heritage Bay CDD, LLC. Total Labor Fees for services proposed herein: $24,485 plus reimbursable expenses. It is understood that fees for the subject project, including but not limited to, application fees, impact fees, utility connection fees, review fees, etc., will be paid directly by the CLIENT. CPH, Inc. FL Page 8 of 9 Rev 4/2016 Payment for services rendered will be due within forty-five (45) days of invoicing. Should the CLIENT choose to not complete the project at any phase of the project, CPH will be due any fees for services up to the time the CLIENT informs CPH in writing to stop work. Payment for services up to the time of the CLIENT'S notice will be due within thirty (30) days of the final invoice. Invoice payments must be kept current for services to continue. CPH reserves the right to terminate or suspend work when invoices become over forty-five (45) days past due. In event that the work is suspended or terminated as a result of non-payment, CLIENT agrees that CPH will not be responsible for CLIENT's failure to meet project deadlines imposed by governments, lenders, or other third parties. Neither is CPH responsible for other adverse consequences as a result of termination or suspension of work for nonpayment of the invoices. This proposal is void if not executed and returned to CPH within 30 days of CPH's execution of the proposal. The above fees, terms, conditions, and specifications are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. CPH is authorized to do the work as specified and payment will be made as outlined above. By signing this agreement, I acknowledge that I have the legal authority to enter into this agreement and agree to be bound by the terms contained herein. By: Signature Printed Name Title: Date: CPH, Inc. FL Page 9 of 9 Rev 4/2016 EXHIBIT A Standard Provisions to Agreement Agreement between (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER/CLIENT")and CPH, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "CPH")for professional services which may include engineering, surveying, architecture, landscape architecture, environmental, forestry, planning, transportation/traffic, etc. dated Standard of Care CPH will endeavor to provide services in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other professionals under similar circumstances practicing in the same or similar locality. The standard of care shall be exclusively judged at the time services are rendered and not according to later standards. CPH makes no express or implied warranty with regard to its services. Compensation,Out of Pocket and Subcontract Expenses "Compensation" as used in the Agreement includes those costs which are connected with the conditions of employment and pay of the employees and include salaries of those employees directly engaged in the performance of the requested services and employer contributions for social security, workers compensation, unemployment and payroll taxes, medical and insurance benefits, retirement benefits, holiday and sick leave pay and other allowed benefits. "Out of Pocket Expenses"as used in the Agreement include such items as travel and subsistence, printing and reproduction, telephone/communications charges, freight, postage, computer and similar costs. "Subcontract Expenses" as used in this Agreement include subcontracts for special consultants such as licensed land surveyors, soils borings and geotechnical and geohydrological services, laboratory services, environmental scientist services and other professional scientific or technical service organizations. Invoice payments are due upon receipt of the invoice and must be kept current for services to continue. Payment should be mailed to CPH, Inc. at 500 West Fulton Street, Sanford, FL 32771. If the OWNER/CLIENT fails to pay any invoice due within 45 days of the date of the invoice, CPH may, without waiving any other claim or right against OWNER/CLIENT, suspend services under this agreement until CPH has been paid in full all amounts due CPH and/or any of its consultants and subconsultants. OWNER/CLIENT shall pay CPH interest at 12% per annum on all invoices that remain unpaid for more than 45 days. Additional Services "Additional Services"of CPH are services which are not considered normal or customary basic services,except to the extent provided in the basic Agreement, and may include such items as preparation of grant or funding applications and supporting documents; additional services or costs resulting from significant changes in the scope or extent of the project or its design or project delays; providing renderings or models for the OWNER/CLIENT's use; preparing documents for alternate bids; furnishing the services of special consultants; resident project representation or resident inspection; services resulting from the award of additional separate contracts;special field surveys; reproducible Record Drawings or original Drawings; providing"as-built"drawings; additional services during construction; serving as a consultant or witness for the OWNER/CLIENT during any litigation, public hearing, etc.; and services normally furnished by the OWNER/CLIENT; or other services not otherwise specifically provided for in the Agreement. Additional services are not included in the basic payment provisions of the Agreement except to the extent specifically provided herein. Opinions of Cost Since CPH has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others,or over the CONTRACTOR(s)' methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, our opinions of probable project cost and construction cost are made on the basis of our experience and qualifications and represent our best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional, familiar with the construction industry; Exhibit A Page 1 of 5 CPH,Inc.-FL Rev 6/2013 Owner/Client Initials CPH is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer but CPH cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual project costs or construction costs will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by us. Use of Documents All documents including Drawings and Specifications prepared by CPH pursuant to this Agreement belong to CPH and are instruments of our service in respect to the project. They are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by the OWNER/CLIENT on another project or any extension of this project, or for use by others on this project, any extension, or any other project. Rights to use of the documents by Owner/Client shall terminate in the event that Owner/Client fails to pay invoices as outlined herein. Underground Utilities and Structures The locations of all existing utilities shown on the drawings prepared by CPH will be based on surveys of at-grade or above grade physical culture (such as valve boxes, hydrants, utility poles, permanent markers) and surveying to pick up temporary utility locate markings provided by the utility. CPH assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of utilities shown by temporary markings provided by the utility or the locations of utilities based on other non-physical features (such as plans prepared by others including mark-ups of locations provided by the utility). The below grade vertical and horizontal locations of utilities will not be required to be surveyed by CPH, and consequently, CPH assumes no responsibility for the location of below grade utilities. The OWNER/CLIENT agrees to release CPH from any liability to OWNER/CLIENT for the failure to locate any existing utility where its physical location could not have reasonably been known based on the above. Termination The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement, may be terminated by either party upon fifteen (15) days' written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement through no fault of the terminating party. If the Agreement is terminated during prosecution of the services and prior to the completion of services, CPH shall be compensated by the OWNER/CLIENT for all services performed under this Agreement to the date of termination. In addition, CPH will be paid for all reasonable expenses resulting from such termination. Construction Administration Where construction administration is provided as a part of the basic services as outlined in the Agreement, CPH shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections, but shall make periodic observations as may be outlined in more detail in the basic Agreement. CPH shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, procedures of construction, or schedules selected by the CONTRACTOR or the safety precautions and programs incident to the work of the CONTRACTOR. CPH will periodically visit the site at intervals outlined in the Agreement to become generally familiar with the progress of the work to keep the Owner advised of the work. CPH will observe the work of the CONTRACTOR to endeavor to determine if the work is in general conformance with the project documents. CPH shall not be responsible for the failure of the CONTRACTOR to perform the construction work in accordance with the Documents. CPH shall provide the OWNER/CLIENT with written notice of any uncorrected defects or deficiencies coming to its attention in the course of the periodic visits above-mentioned. During such visits and on the basis of its on-site observations, CPH may recommend to the OWNER that the CONTRACTOR's work be disapproved or rejected as failing to conform to the Documents. CPH shall not have the right or duty to stop the CONTRACTOR's work. Professional Services Provided by Others Surveying, soils, planning, architecture, landscape architecture, legal, accounting, construction inspection and other services may be provided by the OWNER/CLIENT or others on this project and the results furnished to CPH. It is agreed that CPH may rely upon the results of those services by others in performing its work without verification of same. CPH assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or technical adequacy of such professional services provided by others. Exhibit A Page 2 of 5 CPH,Ina-FL Rev 6/2013 Owner/Client Initials CPH is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer CPH's Approval for Payment Approval of a CONTRACTOR's application for payment is an expression of opinion by CPH and shall at no time be considered as legal obligation on the part of CPH. Neither shall same be considered as an acceptance of any work or materials furnished. CPH's approval for payment is an expression of opinion by CPH that to the best of our knowledge, information and belief, the quality of the work included for payment is in general accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the work as a functioning improvement upon substantial completion and to the results of any subsequent tests or inspection made). By approving an application for payment, CPH will not be deemed to have represented that we have made any examination of how or for what purpose any CONTRACTOR has used the money paid on any of the CONTRACTOR's work or that title to any of the CONTRACTOR's work, materials or equipment has passed to the OWNER/CLIENT, free and clear of any liens,claims, security interests or encumbrances. Checking of Shop Drawings Checking of shop drawings is only for general conformance with the design concept of the project and general compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents. Any action shown is subject to the requirements of the Plans and Specifications. It is the CONTRACTOR's responsibility and not that of the CPH,for dimensions which shall be confirmed and correlated at the job site; fabrication processes and techniques of construction; coordination of his work with that of all other trades and the satisfactory performance of his work. Pre-existing Contaminants CPH shall not be considered a generator, transporter, or disposer of materials affected by regulated contaminants. Because involvement with OWNER/CLIENT's contaminated substances can expose CPH to severe risks, OWNER/CLIENT shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, waive any claim against CPH, and indemnify, defend, and hold CPH harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss allegedly arising from CPH's involvement with OWNER/CLIENT's contaminated substances. OWNER/CLIENT shall also compensate CPH for any time spent or expense incurred by CPH in defense of any such claim. Such compensation shall be based on CPH's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy. Site Safety Responsibilities CPH's site responsibilities are limited solely to the activities of CPH and CPH's employees on the site. These responsibilities shall not be inferred by any party to mean that CPH has responsibility for site safety for any reason. Safety in, on, or about the site is the sole and exclusive responsibility of the Contractor alone. The Contractor's,methods of work performance, superintendence of the contractor's employees and subcontractors, and sequencing of construction are also the sole and exclusive responsibility of the Contractor alone. OWNER/CLIENT warrants that:1)these responsibilities will be made clear in OWNER/CLIENT's agreement with the Contractor; 2) OWNER/CLIENT's agreement with the Contractor shall require the Contractor, to the extent of Contractor's negligence, to indemnify, defend, and hold OWNER/CLIENT and CPH harmless up to a limit of $1,000,000 from any fine, penalty, claim, or liability for injury or loss arising from OWNER/CLIENT'S or CPH's alleged failure to exercise site safety responsibility; and 3)OWNER/CLIENT's agreement with the Contractor shall require the Contractor to make OWNER/CLIENT and CPH additional insureds under the Contractor's general liability insurance policy, which insurance protection shall be primary protection for OWNER/CLIENT and CPH, and shall hold OWNER/CLIENT and CPH harmless from claims, losses, and defense cost arising from the negligence of contractor or subcontractor on any tier up to a limit of $1,000,000. Given the foregoing, OWNER/CLIENT also shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, waive any claim against CPH, and indemnify, defend, and hold CPH harmless up to a limit of$1,000,000 from any claim or liability for injury or loss arising from CPH's alleged failure to exercise site safety responsibility. OWNER/CLIENT also shall compensate CPH for any time spent and attorney fees and expenses incurred by CPH in defense of any such claim. Such compensation shall be based upon CPH's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy. (The term any claim" above referenced shall include, but not limited to, any claim for breach of contract, tort, or statute alleging negligence, errors, omissions, strict liability, statutory liability, breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentation, or other acts giving rise to liability.) Exhibit A Page 3 of 5 CPH,Inc-FL Rev 6/2013 Owner/Client Initials CPH is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Governing Law,Venue,Jurisdiction This instrument is to be interpreted and construed according to the laws of the State of Florida. It is agreed between the parties to this contract that any litigation, lawsuit or court action of any character arising from this agreement shall be filed and/or defended in Seminole County, Florida. All parties under this contract hereby voluntarily submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Florida Courts and the exclusive venue in Seminole County, Florida and do hereby waive any objections to either personal or subject matter jurisdiction of the Florida Courts or to said venue. Attorney Fees and Costs In connection with any dispute arising out of this Contract, each party shall be responsible for their own attorney's fees and costs incurred for services rendered in connection with such dispute, including appellate proceedings and post judgment proceedings. Waiver of Consequential Damages OWNER/CLIENT and CPH mutually agree to waive all claims for consequential damages against each other an each other's respective officers, directors, and employees from any and all claims arising out of the project, including, but not limited to, loss of use, lost profits, and delay damages, against each other, arising from disputes, claims,or other matters relating to this Agreement. Delay In Performance Neither the OWNER/CLIENT nor CPH shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the nonperforming party. Such circumstances shall include, but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions, floods, earthquakes, fire, epidemics; war, riots, and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage; judicial restraint; and delay in or inability to procure permits, licenses, and authorizations from any local, state or federal agency; for any supplies, materials, accesses, or services required to be provided by either the OWNER/CLIENT or CPH under this Agreement. A reasonable extension of time for delay in performance caused by any such circumstances shall be granted. Should such circumstances occur the non-performing party shall within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and efforts being made to resume performance under this Agreement. Project Development,Approvals and Scheduling CPH will, in the course of its work, attempt to generally identify issues that would adversely affect the development of the site for use as proposed by the Owner/Developer. However, CPH cannot control the regulatory process, actions of others, or unforeseen conditions and does not guarantee that the project can be developed for use as proposed, nor does CPH guarantee the timing of or ultimate regulatory approval of the site for development as proposed. The local, state, and federal entities and authorities ("Authorities") having jurisdiction over the project may or may not approve the proposed use of the project. Additionally, it is uncertain how long those Authorities will take to consider and to take action on the applications for the proposed use of the project. Said decisions and approvals are subject to the decision making process of those Authorities. Therefore, CPH cannot represent or guarantee that said Authorities will approve, in whole or in part, the requested use of the project or that the decision making process will be timely for the project's use, or that the Authorities will grant variances applicable to the project. Therefore, the OWNER/CLIENT bears the risk of non-approval of the proposed use and the timing thereof. The OWNER/CLIENT needs to consider the ramifications to it if the project is not approved or only approved in part. Exhibit A Page 4 of 5 CPH,Inc.-FL Rev 6/2013 Owner/Client Initials CPH is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Limitation of Liability: Site Check Studies OWNER/CLIENT acknowledges that CPH's Site Check Studies pursuant to this Agreement are general in nature and are performed before design is started or completed. OWNER/CLIENT acknowledges the recommendation of CPH that the OWNER/CLIENT should not close on the subject property unless and until all applicable agency approvals are obtained and the permitting process is completed. If OWNER/CLIENT elects to close on the subject property prior to that time, OWNER/CLIENT accepts all risks and liability arising from closing prior to obtaining all applicable agency approvals and completion of the permitting process and releases CPH and CPH's officers,directors, and employees from all claims thereof. In order to allocate the relative risks and benefits of the project between the parties, the OWNER/CLIENT agrees to limit the liability of CPH and CPH's officers, directors, and employees for any and all claims arising from CPH's or CPH's officers', directors', and employees' professional acts, negligence, errors, omissions, breach of this contract, or indemnity relating to CPH's Site Check Studies under this contract such that the total aggregate liability of CPH and CPH's officers, directors, and employees to the OWNER/CLIENT shall not exceed the fee for the Site Check Study paid by OWNER/CLIENT to CPH under this Agreement or$10,000,whichever is greater. Design And Other Professional Services OWNER/CLIENT acknowledges that CPH's services pursuant to this Agreement are to assist the client and are for the scope of services as outlined in the attached contract. In order to allocate the relative risks and benefits of the project between the parties, the OWNER/CLIENT agrees to limit the liability of CPH and CPH's officers, directors, and employees for any and all claims arising from CPH's or CPH's officers', directors', and employees' professional acts, negligence, errors, omissions, breach of this contract, or indemnity, such that the total aggregate liability of CPH and CPH's officers, directors, and employees to the OWNER/CLIENT shall not exceed the fee paid by OWNER/CLIENT to CPH under this Agreement or$50,000,whichever is greater. PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE 558.0035, DESIGN PROFESSIONALS; CONTRACTUAL LIMITATION ON LIABILITY - AN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEE OR AGENT MAY NOT BE HELD INDIVIDUALLY LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE Construction Defects on Florida Projects ANY CLAIMS FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE NOTICE AND CURE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 558, FLORIDA STATUTES Exhibit A Page 5 of 5 CPH,Inc.-FL Rev 6/2013 Owner/Client Initials CPH is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Rates & Reimbursables Exhibit B CPH Standard Rates CPH Standard Rates Category Rate Category Rate Principal $190 Principal Landscape Architect $170 Senior Project Manager $180 Senior Landscape Architect $1401 Project Manager $160 Landscape Architect $105 Senior Project Engineer $140 Senior Landscape Designer $100 Project Engineer $120 Landscape Designer $85 Principal Traffic Engineer $180 Project Coordinator $90 Senior Traffic Engineer $135 Traffic Engineer $120 Senior Project Designer $135 Traffic Analyst $115 Project Designer $115 Senior Design Technician $105 Principal Environmental Scientist $175 Design Technician $95 Senior Environmental Scientist $135 CADD Technician $75 Lead Environmental Scientist $105 Environmental Scientist $95 Administrative $75 GIS Analyst $105 Clerical $60 Arborist $125 Network Admin.(I) $80 Principal Planner $170 'Senior Construction Manager $120 Senior Planner $140 Construction Manager $105 Planner _ $100 Construction Field Representative II $110 Construction Field Representative I $80 Principal Architect $180 Senior Architect $160 Principal Surveyor $170 Architect $135 Senior Professional Surveyor $130 Senior Architectural Manager $130 Professional Surveyor and Mapper $125 Senior Architectural Designer $120 Field Technician/Designer $105 Architectural Designer $105 Surveyor in Training $100 Interior Designer $115 Survey Project Manager/CADD $120 Architectural Coordinator $85 Field Crew Coordinator $110 Survey Party Chief $85 Principal Structural Engineer $180 Survey Instrument Man $70 Senior Structural Engineer $1501 Senior Survey CADD Technician $110 Structural Engineer $120 Survey CADD Technician $75 Survey Crew(2 Man) $155 Principal MEP Engineer $180 Survey Crew(Construction Staking-2 Man) $180' Senior MEP Project Engineer $155 Survey Crew C3 Man) $225I MEP Project Engineer $125 GPS(1 Man)/Robotics $145 GPS(2 Man) $180 Senior Graphic Designer $140 1 Man Scanner/Laser Survey Crew $285 Graphic Designer $80 2 Man Scanner/Laser Survey Crew $290 Schedule of Reimbursable Charges Copies(B&W) Plots MAW) Mileage At Current IRS 8.5 x 11 $0.05 Each 11 X 17 S 0.21 Each Rates 8.5 x 14 $0.10 Each 12 X 18 $0.24 Each Phone At Cost Postage At Coat 11 x 17 $0.20 Each 15 X 21 $0.35 Each Outside Reimbursables At Cost 34 X 22 $0.83 Each Copies(Color) 24 X 36 $0.96 Each 8.5 x 11 $0.25 Each 30 X 42 $1.42 Each 8.5 x 14 $0.30 Each 36 X 48 $1.92 Each 11 x 17 $0.35 Each Billing and Reimbursable Rates Are Subject To Periodic Review and Adjustment. Mylars Plots(Color/Bond) Updated:March 5,2018 24 x 38 $9.00 Each 24 x 36 $24.00 Each 32 x 42 $13.00 Each 30 x 42 $35.00 Each 36 x 48 $46.00 Each AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN CPH, INC. 0 [ii) AND HERITAGE BAY CDD, LLC FOR LAKE 30A BOAT LAUNCH IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA January 14, 2019 This Agreement is composed of Part I and Part II. Part I includes details of the services to be performed, timing of the services, and compensations. Part II (attached) contains the CPH's Standard Hourly Rate Table and Standard Contract Provisions, which are the general terms of the engagement between Heritage Bay CDD, LLC, herein after called the "CLIENT", and CPH, Inc., herein after called"CPH". PART I PROJECT DESCRIPTION CLIENT proposed to have designed and constructed, a boat launch for the proposes of lake maintenance on the southeast bank of Lake 30A, located in Collier County, Florida, to include vehicular access from the adjacent roadway and a paved boat ramp with removable bollards to limit access. No docks or seawalls are included in this design. CPH will take the lead role as the project coordinator for the CLIENT, handling the coordination of the other project consultants to assure the timely completion and permitting of the project in a cost effective manner. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. CONSULTANT 1.0 PRELIMINARY DESIGN Based on the CLIENT approved Conceptual Site Plan; CPH will prepare the Preliminary Engineering Plans. The preliminary plans will include the site dimension plan, as well as the preliminary infrastructure design to the proposed site. Plans will be prepared in accordance with the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). Storm Water Management will be designed in accordance with the current standards of the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida, and will include the "Best Management Practices" proposed by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). Plans will be supplied to the CLIENT in reproducible form at a suitable scale to fit on a twenty-four inch by thirty-six inch (24"x 36") plan sheet and will be accurate, legible, complete in design, and suitable for submittal to the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida for preliminary review and approval. The plans and data will be reviewed with the CLIENT, prior to submitting the plans to the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida. This task will be performed and billed as a lump sum service. Refer to the Compensation section of this proposal for the proposed fee. CPH, lnc.—FL Page 1 of 7 Rev 4/2016 2.0 FINAL DESIGN Based on the CLIENT approved Preliminary Engineering Plans; CPH will prepare the Final Engineering Plans (Construction Plans). The final plans will include but may not be limited to the following information: • Cover Sheet • Dimensional Site Plan • Pavement Section(Based on Geotechnical recommendations) • Grading Plan • Sedimentation/Erosion Control Plan • Sedimentation/Erosion Control Details • General Notes, Specifications and Details as applicable Final Engineering plans will be prepared in accordance with the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida, South Florida Water Management District, and Florida DOT. Storm Water Management will be designed in accordance with the current standards of the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida, and will include the"Best Management Practices" proposed by the South Florida Water Management District. Plans will be supplied to the CLIENT in reproducible form at a suitable scale to fit on a twenty-four inch by thirty-six inch (24"x 36") plan sheet and will be legible, complete in design, and suitable for submittal to the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida for final review and approval. The plans and data will be reviewed with the CLIENT, prior to submitting the plans to the Local jurisdiction of Collier County, Florida. This task will be performed and billed as a lump sum service. Refer to the Compensation section of this proposal for the proposed fee. Any modifications to these plans requested by the CLIENT after the plans are prepared for submittal to the Local jurisdiction will be performed as an additional service and billed at the Standard Hourly Rates enclosed. 3.0 PERMITTING Upon receipt of the CLIENT's approval of the respective plans listed above, CPH will prepare the permit applications and support data for the applicable regulatory agencies, including: • Collier County Pre-Application Meeting • Collier County Limited Site Plan Application • South Florida Water Management District Pre-Application Meeting • South Florida Water Management District General Permit Modification If during the feasibility phase, any other agencies are identified as required to approve the project, an amendment to this agreement will be prepared. Unless specifically noted in this contract, no Rezoning, Land Use Changes, or Special Use Permits are included in this task. CPH will coordinate the processing of the applications through the regulatory agencies, including attending a limited number of meetings with the agencies that may be necessary to receive the approval. Within this service are up to two (2) meetings or conference calls with each of the regulatory agencies, one (1) submittal of the applications and supporting documents, and two (2) response to agency comments. In order to minimize travel, meetings with multiple agencies will be scheduled, when possible. Meetings required beyond these will be handled as additional service, and billed in accordance with our Standard Hourly Rates. Should there be a potential for denial on an application, the CLIENT will be informed so they may make the appropriate arrangements to retain legal CPH. Inc. FL Page 2 of 7 Rev 4/2016 staff to address the denial should it occur. The CLIENT will be financially responsible for any application or filing fee required by the agencies. This task will be performed and billed as a lump sum service. Refer to the Compensation section of this proposal for the proposed fee. Any modifications to the plans requested by the Regulatory Agencies pertaining to the infrastructure design in the previously mentioned plans, required to meet code, will be addressed by CPH as part of these services. Any modifications requested that are not code issues, or modifications requested by the CLIENT will be addressed as additional services and billed at the Standard Hourly Rates enclosed. Any other permits that may arise during the design or review process, and not outlined above, will be handled as an additional service,and billed in accordance with our Standard Hourly Rates. 1.1 MEETINGS The following meetings are included in this task: • Project Kick-Off with District Supervisors and Managers B. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. C. SURVEYING Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. D. ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. E. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. F. LAND PLANNING Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. G. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. H. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. J. BUILDERS SERVICES CPU, Inc.—FL Page 3 of 7 Rev 4/2016 Not included in this contract. If this service is needed, CPH can provide cost under separate contract. CLIENT-FURNISHED INFORMATION It is understood that CPH will perform services under the sole direction of the CLIENT. In the performance of these services, CPH will coordinate its efforts with those of other project team members as required. The CLIENT shall provide CPH with project-related technical data including, but not limited to, the following: • Project size, location, identification number, and building program. • Current title commitment and any existing boundary and topographic surveys and plats. If CPH is not performing surveying services as part of the contract, CLIENT to provide current boundary and topographic information in AutoCAD 14 or more recent version, or DXF format. • Previous Environmental investigation reports. • Previous Geotechnical investigation reports. • Master plan or development plans for the overall project. Preferably in AutoCAD 14 or more recent version, or DXF format. • Any other pertinent information concerning this project to which the CLIENT may have access. CPH will rely upon the accuracy and completeness of CLIENT-furnished information in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. CPH will begin performance of the above services upon verbal authorization followed by written authorization within 7 days of the verbal authorization to proceed is received. The schedule is also subject to timely delivery of information by the CLIENT and is exclusive of CLIENT and local review of interim products. If the CLIENT requests that work under this agreement be stopped, the schedule is subject to renegotiation when written authorization to continue is received. COMPENSATION Labor CPH will perform the Scope of Services contained in this Agreement as identified on each task, either lump sum or time and materials. Refer to the Standard Hourly Rate Schedule to be utilized on this project. The following is the break down of fees for each task. Tasks that are identified as Time and Materials (Hourly) have been provided an 'Upset Limit' (USL) budget. The CLIENT will be informed when the services are about to exceed this limit. Phase No. Phase Description Billing Method Fee A. CONSULTANT 1.0 Preliminary Design Lump Sum $4,900 2.0 Final Design Lump Sum $8,800 3.0 Permitting Lump Sum $6,000 CPH, Inc.—FL Page 4 of 7 Rev 4/2016 Reimbursable Expenses In addition to the labor compensation outlined above, CPH shall be reimbursed directly for project specific expenditures such as, but not limited to travel, printing and reprographics, meals, hotel stay, rental cars, postage, and telephone usage. Reimbursable expenses will be billed at their actual cost,without increase. SERVICES NOT INCLUDED The following services are not anticipated and, therefore, not included in this Agreement at this time: • Expert witness for litigation. • Construction staking. • Environmental studies and coordination of environmental issues with the regulatory agencies. • Geotechnical studies and additional testing required by the regulatory agencies. • Off-site utility analysis and design. • Off-site storm water analysis and design. • Expediting the review process of the permits identified herein. • Any permits not identified herein. • Structural Engineering design of retaining walls. • Structural Engineering design of boat launch. • Change Order preparation. • Pay request review • Review of an alternative product in lieu of the product called for on the plans and specifications. • Special meetings with agencies, other consultants or CLIENT not normally required to perform the work described in the Scope of Services, except those meetings specifically identified in the above Scope of Work • Special requests by lending institutions or other parties not essential to completing the work described in the Scope of Services • Permitting efforts relating to obtaining variances for the site development including tree issues, setbacks, parking, etc. • Design of hardscape features including but not limited to structures, fountains, lighting, special paving, or signage • Storm water modeling and/or analysis of the existing storm water pond system for retrofitting of the existing site • Traffic studies or signalization design • Easement or right-of-way vacation or dedication services or platting services • Electrical, Mechanical, or Structural Engineering services • Design and permitting of buildings and structures including bridges, retaining walls, etc. • Design and/or permitting efforts associated with the site improvements (paving, grading, drainage, utilities, etc.)for future phases of the project • Services resulting from changes made by CLIENT following the completion of specific project tasks that require re-work by CPH • Wetlands Permitting • Flood Plain Analyses • Site Specific Maintenance of Traffic Plans CPH, Inc.—FL Page 5 of 7 Rev 4/2016 • Any other issues not specifically described in this proposal Should work be required in any of these areas, or areas not previously described, CPH will prepare a proposal or amendment, at the CLIENT's request, that contains the Scope of Services,fee, and schedule required to complete the additional work item. CPH, INC. AUTHORIZATION By: rey M. Satfield, P.E.' Vice President Date: 71((.1 CLIENT AUTHORIZATION Heritage Bay CDD, LLC agrees with Part I which includes the Scope of Services and Compensation Schedule. Part II contains CPH's Standard Contract Provisions referenced as Exhibit A and CPH's Standard Hourly Rate Schedule referenced as Exhibit B (attached hereto and acknowledged as being received). Together they constitute the entire Agreement between CPH, Inc. and Heritage Bay CDD, LLC. Total Labor Fees for services proposed herein: $19,700 plus reimbursable expenses. It is understood that fees for the subject project, including but not limited to, application fees, impact fees, utility connection fees, review fees, etc., will be paid directly by the CLIENT. Payment for services rendered will be due within forty-five (45) days of invoicing. Should the CLIENT choose to not complete the project at any phase of the project, CPH will be due any fees for services up to the time the CLIENT informs CPH in writing to stop work. Payment for services up to the time of the CLIENT'S notice will be due within thirty (30) days of the final invoice. Invoice payments must be kept current for services to continue. CPH reserves the right to terminate or suspend work when invoices become over forty-five (45)days past due. In event that the work is suspended or terminated as a result of non-payment, CLIENT agrees that CPH will not be responsible for CLIENT's failure to meet project deadlines imposed by governments, lenders, or other third parties. Neither is CPH responsible for other adverse consequences as a result of termination or suspension of work for nonpayment of the invoices. This proposal is void if not executed and returned to CPH within 30 days of CPH's execution of the proposal. The above fees, terms, conditions, and specifications are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. CPH is authorized to do the work as specified and payment will be made as outlined above. By signing this agreement, I acknowledge that I have the legal authority to enter into this agreement and agree to be bound by the terms contained herein. CPH, Inc.—FL Page 6 of 7 Rev 4/2016 fir By: , ( Signature Justin Faircloth-As approved by the Printed Name Board at the 12/6/18 meeting. Title: District Manager Date: 1/18/19 CPH, Inc.—FL Page 7 of 7 Rev 4/2016 Rates & Reimbursables Exhibit CPH Standard Rates CPH Standard Rates Category Rate Category Rate Principal $1901 Principal Landscape Architect _ $1701 Senior Project Manager $1801 Senior Landscape Architect $1401 Project Manager $1601 Landscape Architect $1051 Senior Project Engineer $1401 Senior Landscape Designer $1001 Project Engineer $1201 Landscape Designer $851 Principal Traffic Engineer $1801 Project Coordinator $901 Senior Traffic Engineer ` $1351 Traffic Engineer $1201 1Senior Project Designer_ $1351 Traffic Analyst $115; Project Designer $1151 1 Senior Design Technician $1051 Principal Environmental Scientist $1751 Design Technician $9511 Senior Environmental Scientist $1351 CADD Technician $75 Lead Environmental Scientist $1051 Environmental Scientist $951 Administrative $751 GIS Analyst $105; Clerical $601 Arborist $1251 Network Admin._ji) $801 I Principal Planner $1701 Senior Construction Manager $1201 Senior Planner $1401 Construction Manager $105'1 Planner $1001 _Construction Field Representative II _ $1101 Construction Field Representative I $801 Principal Architect $180; 1 Senior Architect $160; Principal Surveyor $170 Architect $1351 Senior Professional Surveyor $130'. ,Senior Architectural Manager $1301 Professional Surveyor and Mapper $125 Senior Architectural Designer i $1201 Field Technician/Designer $105 Architectural Designer $1051 Surveyor in Training $100'. Interior Designer $115 Survey Project Manager/CADD $120, Architectural Coordinator $651 Field Crew Coordinator $110 Survey Party Chief $85 Principal Structural Engineer $1801 Survey Instrument Man $701 Senior Structural Engineer $1501 Senior Survey CADD Technician $1101 Structural Engineer $1201 Survey CADD Technician $751 1 Survey Crew(2 Man) $155 Principal MEP Engineer __.$1801 Survey Crew(Construction Staking-2 Man) $1801 Senior MEP Project Engineer $1551 Survey Crew(3 Man) $2251 MEP Project Engineer $1251 GPS(1 Man)/Robotics $145 I GPS(2 Man) $1801 Senior Graphic Designer $1401 1 Man Scanner/Laser Survey Crew $2651 Graphic Designer $801 2 Man Scanner/Laser Survey Crew $290' Schedule of Reimbursable Charges Copies(8&W) Plots(B&W) Mileage At Current IRS 8.5 x 11 $0.05 Each 11 X 17 $0.21 Each Rates 8.5 x 14 $0.10 Each 12 X 1S $0.24 Each Phone At Cost 11 x 17 $0.20 Each 15 X 21 $0.35 Each Postage At Cost Outside Reimbursable' At Cost 34 X 22 $0.83 Each Copies(Color) 24 X 36 S 0.96 Each 8.5 x 11 $0.25 Each 30 X 42 S 1.42 Each 8.5 at 14 $0.30 Each 36 X 48 $1.92 Each 11 x 17 $0_35 Each Billing and Reimbursable Rates Are Subject To Periodic Review and Adjustment. Mylars Plots(Color/Bond) Updated:March 5,2018 24 x 36 $9.00 Each 24 x 36 524.00 Each 32 x 42 $13.00 Each 30 x 42 $35.00 Each 36 x 46 548.00 Each From: Kay Lukas <klukasAitechsolutions.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 1:35 PM To: Edwin Hubbard; 'Cheryl 011ila'; quarryjoebqmail.com; lerrymsolomonAgmail.corn; quarrychipt gmaiI.com; ambambAyahoo.com Cc: Chris Lukas; adam.radler(c�fsresidential.com Subject: Boulder Lake -Water Rescue Hi Everyone, Not sure if ! should be e-mailing all of you or the CDD, I am hoping you can point me in the right direction because I believe this is a very serious matter and want to get in the right hands. On Saturday, My husband and I got a text that the sheriff's department was looking for a boat to go rescue two teenagers in Boulder Lake. The two teenagers were here visiting and must not have been warned about the weeds in Boulder Lake. They took their jet ski into Boulder lake and the engine stalled due to the weeds getting wrapped around the engine. The jet ski starting going under with them on it. When we got the text we went over to Boulder lake and found the kids in the middle of the lake with only the nose of their jet ski up in the air and no one around. We pulled the kids out the water and they told us they were in the water for over 1/2 hour waiting for help. Once they were safely in the boat, the other emergency vehicles showed up and towed the jet ski out of the water. Luckily the kids had a cell phone and called for help and that is how we go notified to help them. As responsible people, we really need to do something about the weeds in the Boulder Lake before someone gets seriously hurt. They were just kids! I also paddleboard and this year I can hardly paddle thru the weeds in Stone Lake to get to the middle, the weeds are that bad, so we know the problem is not just in Boulder lake. Please let me know what is being done about the weeds. Sincerely, Kay Lukas, From: Edwin Hubbard <ehubbard@heritagebaycdd.com> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2018 5:26 PM To: Cheryl 011ila <cherylollila©hotmail.com> Cc: Edwin Hubbard <ehubbard@heritagebaycdd.com>; Faircloth, Justin <Justin.Faircloth@inframark.com> Subject: Re: QCA Update-Boating Resolution Thanks Cheryl for the update. We will be glad to meet with your members as identified to discuss the issues which we are faced with. Ed From: Cheryl 011ila <cherylollila(a)hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 1:13:13 PM To: Edwin Hubbard Cc: Adam Radler; peter rietz; Laura Severance Subject: Fwd: QCA Update-Boating Resolution FYI - new boating resolution that opens Stone Lake to full boating. Based on several complaints about the weed situation in Boulder Lake, Adam Radler and Peter Rietz (Co-Chair of the QCA Lakes Committee)will be contacting you to schedule a meeting to discuss. I know you have responded a few times to Diane Lecca but she is not the only person asking why Heritage Lake can be cleaned-up but Boulder Lake is full of IPW. Now that Greg Urbancic and Peter Rietz have finished their part of the Indemnification Agreement, we will have an internal discussion now with the balance of the QCA Board and the Chair of the QCA Governing Documents Committee. From there it will need to be reviewed by the Quarry CDD's attorney and the QCA attorney - so still a hill to climb with all the reviews and approvals. We wish to thank both Peter and Greg for all of their efforts on the document. Finally, before any amendments to the "Quarry Recreational Lakes and Docks Use Regulations" are approved by the QCA Board, we will send to you for review. Thanks, Cheryl Begin forwarded message: From: "Adam Radler"<adam.radler@fsresidential.com> Subject: QCA Update-Boating Resolution Date: November 2, 2018 at 9:47:32 AM EDT To: "Cheryl 011ila"<chcrylollila(ci)hotmail.com> Reply-To: adam.radler(c fsresidential.com T E QUAR RY A RESOLUTION BY QUARRY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. (QCA) BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Directors of the Quarry Community Association,Inc. (QCA)hereby issue the following resolution, effective beginning Friday,November 2,2018 which rescinds and replaces the boating resolution effective 10-9-18. Based on a recent review of the shoreline and current water levels by Joshua Maxwell,Professional Engineer at Turrell,Hall &Associates, Inc.,Marine&Environmental Consulting,the "no wake" limit is lifted on all Quarry Recreational Lakes.Mr. Maxwell concluded that,provided the water level remains below 13'(as measured at the bridge between Stone and Boulder Lakes),boating and towing sports can be resumed without damage to the unrepaired areas of Stone Lake shoreline. Watercraft may operate in the Recreational Lakes from one-half(1/2)hour after sunrise to one-half(1/2)hour after sunset. Proper navigational lighting is required on all Watercraft during times of low visibility i.e.rain, fog,darkness, etc. "No Wake" operation with proper navigational lighting is allowed until 10:00 pm. Based on the recommendation of the QCA Lakes Committee and supported by the QCA Board,each Quarry boat will continue to be limited to two hours per day of towing watersports participants. This includes but is not limited to: water skiing,wakeboarding,tubing,kneeboarding,wakesurfing,and barefooting. This limitation applies to all three Quarry Recreational Lakes: Stone Lake,Boulder Lake and Heritage Lake. Quarry boaters are reminded to stay 250'away from the eastern shore of Heritage Lake as this shoreline remains damaged and will be repaired beginning in January or February 2019,per the Heritage Bay CDD. The issue of the Illinois Pond Weed growth in Boulder Lake will be addressed with the Heritage Bay CDD. In addition to the above,please Click Here to review a copy of the current "Quarry Recreational Lakes and Docks Use Regulations".A revised version of this document is being reviewed by the QCA Board and will be distributed to all homeowners for comment prior to adoption and approval at a QCA Board Meeting in the nea future. The QCA Board of Directors would like to thank the Lakes Committee for all of their efforts in scheduling the test and follow-up with the engineering firm to get full boating privileges restored. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that any person in violation of the above directives may,in accordance with the Declaration of Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions For The Quarry, Section 11.3 Rules and Regulations,be fined up to$1,000(which shall constitute a lien upon the Owner's Lot or Lots)and the suspension of the right to use any Common Area,including, without limitation,the Beach Club until such time that the directive is rescinded.As a self-policing community,homeowners are asked to report violations to the QCA office via email(with attached photo or video)to adam.radler aifsresidential.com. The Quarry Board of Directors Quarry Community Association 8975 Kayak Drive Naples, FL 34120 239-348-7326 From: Diane <Dianelec@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 9:38 AM To: 'Edwin Hubbard' <ehubbard@heritagebaycdd.com> Cc: 'Cheryl 011ila' <cherylollila@hotmail.com>; Faircloth, Justin <Justin.Faircloth@inframark.com>; reginablk@aol.com; kim@reptileindustries.com; nick@wakeboardnaples.com; Jake and Ilene <jmblaz@sbcglobal.net>; 'James Kress' <kressj4l@gmail.com>; 'Lloyd Schliep' <kahuunal@comcast.net>; Steve Brown <ambamb@yahoo.com>; 'Tim Cantwell' <tcantwell@imr-services.com>; arainey46@gmail.com; barbjacob64@gmail.com; barb@thebarnhouses.com; Chris Lukas <clukas@itechsolutions.com>;jeaganmidwood.com; Jake and Ilene <jmblaz@sbcglobal.net>; kim@reptileindustries.com; klukas@itechsolutions.com; 'Mark Marino' <mark@mkmimporters.com>; 'Norm Idelson' <nidelson@comcast.net>; Betsy and Phil Q <philbetsy@gmail.com>; 'Pat ARNAIZ' <parnaiz@comcast.net>; 'Rock Eiden' <reiden@shapeproducts.com>; Chris Thomas <spy2551@netzero.com>; Don Sandoli <donsandoli@gmail.com>; Dave Hill <davidfhill21@gmail.com>; Deb Daniels <debd8668@yahoo.com>; Faircloth, Justin <Justin.Faircloth@inframark.com>; 'Jim Utecht' <utechtjames@yahoo.com>; 'Joe Mattrone' <jmatrone@optonline.net>; Jerry Solomon <jerrymsolomon@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Boulder Lake Weeds/ Boating Heritage Bay Lakes Hello Mr. Hubbard, Thank you for your response and your invitation to your meeting on December 6,2018. However, your response seems to very vague once again. I am hoping that you remove the weeds and treat Boulder Lake just like you are in Heritage Bay Lake at this time PRIOR to your meeting. You are pulling out weeds, piling them up and removing them from your lake. You have alluded to just using chemicals in Boulder Lake and no weed removal in your response below. Why would you maintain your lake with pulling weeds and removal and not do the same for Boulder Lake? It is in my opinion that both lakes should be treated the same and maintained the same. As noted in your comments, you have weeded Heritage Bay Lake several times and not Boulder Lake which has a slalom course which is inundated with weeds. I would like to point to your committee what can happen when you allow a lake to get overgrown with weeds and then attempt to kill the weeds with chemicals. It cost our county to drain and dredge Lake Trafford because of the lack of maintenance of the weeds and allowed them to spread. The weeds then prevent oxygen from reaching the bottom of the lake and cutting off oxygen and therefore, causing a fish kill and then results in an algae bloom. The ONLY way to cure they cured this lack of maintenance is drain and dredge the lake and start all over again. This costs the county millions to do just a few years ago. It is my opinion that Boulder Lake has 30 to 50 percent of weed coverage at this time. I think it is in your best interested to treat Boulder Lake and keep the boaters on that lake which is more desirable for boating and a larger lake. The noise and the waves do not affect the shoreline. You and your residents of Heritage Bay would benefit from your maintaining our lake, not just your lake. In retrospect, I have been complaining about this lake to our Lakes Committee and our HOA since I moved into the Quarry a few years ago. I am not even sure we still have a lakes committee, and if so they are a do nothing committee. Since our HOA has its hands full with several other major problems from the hurricane, our residents will be forming our own committee called "SAVE BOULDER LAKE". However, we do plan on attending your meeting with several boaters and residents from the Quarry with hopes of thanking you for pulling weeds and maintaining our lake PRIOR to your meeting. We will no longer sit idle and which our beautiful lake deteriorate. Why isn't the weed company that you hired for Heritage Bay Lake working on Boulder Lake next?Why won't you make a commitment to maintain our lake? Do we have anyone on the Heritage Bay CCD that lives on Boulder Lake or a resident of the Quarry and if so, please provide me with the name of that person or persons so that I can forward this email to them as well. Thanking you for your time, Make it a Great Day, Diane Bernashe-Lecca The Quarry "Save Boulder Lake" From: Edwin Hubbard [mailto:ehubbardt heritaciebaycdd.com] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 7:52 PM To: Diane Cc: Cheryl 011ila; Faircloth, Justin; Edwin Hubbard Subject: Re: Boulder Lake Weeds/ Boating Heritage Bay Lakes Diane I do not think it wise or productive to get into a continual email exchange with you but I will offer a few comments in this response as well as invite you to attend our next scheduled CDD meeting on December 6 in the Heritage Bay clubhouse. Our meeting starts at 9 AM. We do allow for guest comments on agenda items at the start of the meeting and I will make sure there is a agenda item on The Quarry recreational lakes concerns. Now, as to commenting on your latest note to me, I offer the following: -Heritage Lake is closed and blocked off with a turbidity barrier to ensure that while we clean out this lake of the Illinois Pond Weed (IPW), no cuttings migrate into Boulder Lake and up to your shorelines. Once we complete the cutting and clean up of this lake, we will be sure to take the barrier down and you will be free to boat on Heritage Lake. And, I am quite sure you and your boaters will be very happy with the clean up and accessibility to good boating! -we do cut the east end of Boulder Lake so that there are no issues with boats making their way up to and under the bridge. -as I stated to TQ representatives previously, we understand our responsibilities as well as your desire to boat on Heritage Lake and we always want to make sure that this lake is as free of the IPW as possible. And as have consistently noted, we understand that this lake is a desirable lake for boating and we have no intention to dissuade your boaters from using this lake -as we did last summer, as well as this current one, on Boulder Lake we did not attempt to cut and/or treat the IPW with chemicals but we will commence this activity as soon as practical. I personally do not recall any major issues last year during season and our goal will be to control the IPW as much and as soon as possible. -your homeowners do not make any payments which then go toward the Heritage Bay CDD maintenance of these two lakes. We completely self fund our lake maintenance activities. If you feel it worthwhile, we look forward to you visiting our CDD meeting in December. Respectfully submitted, Ed From: Diane <Dianelec(a�comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 11:10 AM To: Edwin Hubbard; kimreptileindustries.com; reginablk[a�aol.com; Jake and Ilene; jeagan(c�rnidwood.com; Chris Lukas; Chris Thomas; chriscibelli(yahoo.com; bjburke528Agmail.com; Betsy and Phil Q; Cathy & Cliff Anderson; Don Sandoli; 'Lloyd Schliep'; 'Tim Cantwell' Cc: 'Cheryl 011ila'; 'Faircloth, Justin'; Steve Brown; nickAwakeboardnaples.com Subject: Boulder Lake Weeds/ Boating Heritage Bay Lakes Hello, Your comments below still do not answer the questions. The rest of your letter states" we are maintaining the east side only" and since I have a birds eye view from my home, you have ONLY been weeding next to the entrance road of Heritage Bay. I find it ironic that you have the funds to maintain all of Heritage Bay Lake and you have been doing that all summer long. As you alluded to in the letter"we will try to avoid cutting our weeds and leaving them drift in Boulder Lake". You have been releasing weeds into our lake for years from Heritage Bay Lake and now you are using a barrier under the bridge. If it unfortunate that the boaters are not able to boat in Heritage Bay Lake even when you are not weeding. The barrier has been up since last weekend. Today you have a company pulling out your weeds and stock piling them. You have not maintained the Boulder Lake for well over two years. The lake view is VERY unpleasant to look at and almost impossible to boat in, and this will be exacerbated once the water level lowers which has already started. You have mentioned in your previous letter that Heritage Bay CDD is responsible for the maintenance of Boulder Lake. I understand that we all pay a portion of our HOA fees go to you for maintenance of the Lake. If that the case, I will suggest that you return the funds and our HOA stop providing you funds. Are you spending our funds on Heritage Bay Lake? If you do not response to the email and provide a maintenance schedule for Boulder Lake, you will leave us no choice but to seek legal counsel. We as homeowners who live on Boulder Lake and boaters would like to be notified if you are having meetings that involve Boulder Lake weeds and boating on Heritage Bay Lake. Our lakes committee (not even sure if we still have one) is very lackadaisical. Thank you, Diane Lecca MAKE IT A GREAT DAY, Diane Lecca Premiere Plus Realty Co. 12th Ave South Naples, Florida 34102 239-776-2977 direct 239-236-0233 fax From: Edwin Hubbard rmailto:ehubbard c(r�heritagebaycdd.coml Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 2:32 PM To: Diane Cc: Cheryl 011ila; Faircloth, Justin; Edwin Hubbard Subject: Re: Boulder Lake Weeds Hi Diane There is no question on the part of the Heritage Bay CDD that maintaining the Illinois Pond Weed in our two lakes is our responsibility. I will copy a portion of the letter which I sent to Adam Radler on July 7 from our CDD. Portion of the Letter Dated July 17, 2018 (italics) Over the past few years we have tried various treatments to stem the growth of the Illinois Pond Weed (IPW) in our two recreational lakes. I would guess that you, and your CDD, have grown equally frustrated by the constant treatments required and the related costs to control this common Florida aquatic plant. As you know, we have begun to rely on two forms of treatments; during the rainy season when the water in these lakes is "moving"the greatest, we are utilizing the Truxor device to cut the weeds and when the lakes are at the lowest, we utilize the Truxor and various types of chemicals to attempt to kill the weeds. I believe you are resorting to the same techniques. Going forward, we are notifying you that we will utilize the following procedures: - we will continue to utilize chemicals to control the IPW during the dry season and will treat all areas of this lake which we are responsible for; this includes the areas within this lake as well as along the Heritage Bay/The Quarry property line (reference the Interlocal Agreement). As communicated some time ago, we do not treat the north or south sides of this lake. -during the wet season/high water when it is most appropriate to utilize the Truxor device, we will cut only the east end of Boulder Lake and attempt to control the movement of the cuttings to the best of our ability. We will not be cutting any of the iPW within the other areas of this lake. We hope you understand our decision and wish to assure we are not taking this decision lightly. if better or more efficient processes become available, we will do our best to explore them and keep Boulder Lake as free of IPW as reasonably possible. We further ask that you notify your boaters that there will be weeds growing at your end of the lake, and within this lake, and that they need to exercise the utmost caution. Furthermore, as you probably have noted, the majority of"speed boating" occurs in Heritage Lake and we will continue to control all IPW to the best of our ability. Now that the waters are starting to recede and when we see that the flow has stopped out of our communities into the Cocahatchee Canal, we anticipate having the ability to get into Boulder Lake and start to utilize both the Truxor AND the appropriate chemicals to cut down on the IPW. Until then, we must again stress the need for boaters to exercise the utmost caution when traveling within and through this lake. For your information, we are in the process of cutting the IPW this week in Heritage Lake to ensure that boaters have a good place to water ski. Thanks for reaching out to me and as we start to work on Boulder Lake I will be sure to notify The Quarry Community Association representatives. Ed Chairman-Heritage Bay CDD From: Diane <Dianelec(a�comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 11:37 PM To: Edwin Hubbard Subject: Boulder Lake Weeds Hello, When are you going to weed Boulder Lake? This is your responsible to maintain Boulder Lake and the weeds are making it very difficult to even boat anywhere on the lake. Resident of Quarry Diane Lecca Heritage Bay Community Development District Inframark Infrastructure Management Services 5911 Country Lakes Drive• Fort Myers,Florida 33905 Telephone:(239)245-7118• Fax:(239)245-7120 November 28,2018 George E.Mather and Elaine Mather, George E.Mather and Elaine Mather, Trustees of the Newport 19 Trust date Trustees of the Newport 19 Trust date October 22,2013,as amended October 22,2013,as amended 10410 Smokehouse Bay Dr. 3610 Grand Cypress Dr. Naples,FL 34120 Naples,FL 34119 Re: Heritage Bay Community Development District Stormwater Improvements to Lake 20 Mr.Mather and Ms.Mather: Heritage Bay Community Development District(the"CDD")is an independent special district that provides certain services to the Heritage Bay community, including maintenance of the stormwater management system within Heritage Bay. You may be aware that over the past year the CDD has been undertaking extensive repairs and improvements to the stormwater management system throughout the Heritage Bay community. One of the next stormwater projects that will be undertaken by the CDD is the repair and restoration work to Lake 20, the lake behind your home. Because of the nature of the improvements behind your home,we wanted to provide you notice of the upcoming work and seek your permission for a small portion of the work on your property. The work to be performed by the CDD on Lake 20 includes the rebuilding of the lake bank for Lake 20 and such other grading to be consistent with the permits originally issued by South Florida Water Management District ("SFWMD") for Heritage Bay. As part of this Lake 20 project, the CDD will be filling in a portion of an area behind your home that was apparently cut out during the original construction of your pool. The filling in of this area is necessary for compliance with the original SFWMD permit and the proper functioning of the CDD's stormwater management system. Attached is a conceptual plan showing a cross-section of the work to be done behind your home. Nearly all of the work to be done by the CDD on this project is within the Lake 20 area owned by the CDD. However, the CDD is proposing to also fill in a small area on your property as shown in the attached sketch. Filling in this small area will create a consistent grade along the lake bank and prevent water from puddling in between your pool and the lake bank. Because this portion of the Lake 20 project would involve the CDD entering upon your property to complete the work, the CDD is requesting your written permission to do so. After filling in the area as shown in the attached sketch,the CDD will restore the area with grass. II If you could kindly sign a copy of this letter evidencing your consent and return it back to me,it would be appreciated. If you have any questions regarding the upcoming project,please feel free to contact my office. Sincerely, Justin Faircloth District Manager Enclosure cc: Board of Supervisors,Heritage Bay Community Development District Consent to enter our property for purposes of the CDD's Lake 20 work: George E.Mather,Trustee of the Newport 19 Trust date October 22,2013,as amended Elaine Mather,Trustee of the Newport 19 Trust date October 22,2013,as amended W D II CI0 W < 2W W � p0 � X DO - Qcr i w a .. 0 � ctai- i� OW Q Z cn ¢O 0W U) dCOQ 00 u• 0 fn C3 WO ZD 20 WZ Q i- Z U1 = X W W 00 0 0 a J J Lake &Wetland ( MANAGEMENT SPECIALSERVICE_AGREEMENT This Agreement is made between Lake and Wetland Management, Inc. Orlando- Tampa, and: October 18, 2018 Mr. Justin Faircloth Heritage Bay Community Development District c/o Inframark Management Services Justin.faircloth@inframark.com 5911 Country Lakes Drive (239) 245-7118 Office Fort Myers, Florida 33905 (239) 245-7120 Fax Both Heritage Bay CDD (CUSTOMER) and Lake and Wetland Management (LWM) agree to these terms and conditions for Special Service Agreement: Descrtion One-Time Tree Trimming LWM ground crew will trim all cypress trees in the lake areas throughout the community. Estimate two days to complete. All trimmed debris will be hauled offsite, Total: $3,500.00 Conditions: 1. Ownership of property is implied by CUSTOMER with acceptance of this Agreement. In the event that CUSTOMER does not expressly own the areas where the above stated services are to be provided, CUSTOMER represents that express permission of the owner is given and that authorization to commence the above mentioned services is allowed. In the event of dispute of ownership, CUSTOMER agrees to hold harmless LWM for the consequences of such services. 2. LWM shall not be responsible for acts beyond its reasonable control, including adverse soil and / or water conditions, adverse weather conditions, unavailable materials, Acts of God, war, acts of vandalism, theft or third party actions. CUSTOMER further states that neither party shall be responsible in damages or penalties for any failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations caused by above named incidences. 3. Invoices submitted for work completed shall be paid within 30 days of receipt. A finance charge of 1.500% per month or an annual percentage rate of 18.000% will be computed on all past due balances. Lake and Welland Management,Inc. (239)313-6947 Office • (239)313-6950 Fax • office(lakeandweitand.corn • www.lakeandwetland;.cern Special Service Agreement Page 2 4. Any incidental activity not explicitly mentioned in this proposal is excluded from the scope of work. 5. This proposal shall be valid for 30 days, 6. If LWM is required to enroll in any third-party compliance programs, invoicing or payment plans that asses fees in order to perform work for CUSTOMER, those charges will be invoiced back to CUSTOMER as invoiced to LWM. 7. LWM will maintain insurance coverage, which includes but is not limited to; General Liability Property Damage, Automobile Liability, and Workman's Compensation at its own expense. 8. No alterations or modifications, oral or written, of the terms contained above shall be valid unless made in writing, and wholly accepted by authorized representatives of both LWM and the CUSTOMER. Customer acceptance —The above prices, specifications and conditions are hereby accepted. onz to,ores__ _ Gonzalo Ayres Authorized signature Date Lake and Wetland Management, Inc. Heritage Bay CDD Lake and Wetland Management,Inc. (239)313.6947 Office + (239)113.6950 Fax • office@lakcandwetiand cam • www.lakeandweiland.com HERITAGE BAY Community Development District Financial Report October 31, 2018 (Unaudited) Prepared by 4INFRAMARK Ilii kASIRVC�VRE�nrv�Gfrnt yv vim HERITAGE BAY Community Development District Table of Contents FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Pages Balance Sheet-All Funds 1 Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance General Fund 2-3 Debt Service Fund 4-5 SUPPORTING SCHEDULES Trend Report 6-7 Cash and Investment Report 8 Construction Report Schedule 9 Requisitions List 10-11 Bank Reconciliation 12 Check Register&Invoice Copies 13-45 HERITAGE BAY Community Development District Financial Statements (Unaudited) October 31, 2018 HERITAGE BAY Community Development District Governmental Funds Balance Sheet October 31, 2018 2018 SERIES 2018 SERIES DEBT CONSTRUCTION GENERAL SERVICE &ACQUISITION ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION FUND FUND FUND TOTAL ASSETS Cash-Checking Account $ 159,739 $ - $ - $ 159,739 Due From Other Funds - 7,370 - 7,370 Investments: Money Market Account 247,146 - - 247,146 Construction Fund - - 949,746 949,746 Interest Fund(A-1) - 250,344 - 250,344 Interest Fund(A-2) - 58,717 - 58,717 Prepayment Account - 3,635 - 3,635 Reserve Fund - 389,556 - 389,556 Revenue Fund - 127,106 - 127,106 TOTAL ASSETS $ 406,885 $ 836,728 $ 949,746 $ 2,193,359 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ 6,416 $ - $ - $ 6,416 Due To Other Funds 7,370 - - 7,370 TOTAL LIABILITIES 13,786 - 13,786 FUND BALANCES Restricted for: Debt Service - 836,728 - 836,728 Capital Projects - - 949,746 949,746 Assigned to: Operating Reserves 95,041 - - 95,041 Reserves-Erosion Control 14,687 - - 14,687 Reserves-Lakes 93,750 - - 93,750 Reserves-Loan 4,750 - - 4,750 Reserves-Stormwater System 18,455 - - 18,455 Unassigned: 166,416 - - 166,416 TOTAL FUND BALANCES $ 393,099 $ 836,728 $ 949,746 $ 2,179,573 TOTAL LIABILITIES&FUND BALANCES $ 406,885 $ 836,728 $ 949,746 $ 2,193,359 Page 1 HERITAGE BAY Community Development District General Fund Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Period Ending October 31, 2018 ANNUAL ADOPTED YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE VARIANCE(S) ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL FAV(UNFAV) REVENUES Interest-Investments $ 400 $ 33 $ 278 $ 245 Special Assmnts-Tax Collector 355,190 - - - Specials Assmnts-Lakes 30A&30B 60,923 - - - Special Assmnts-Reserves 31,250 - - - Special Assmnts-Discounts (17,895) - - - TOTAL REVENUES 429,868 33 278 245 EXPENDITURES Administration P/R-Board of Supervisors 12,000 1,000 1,000 - FICA Taxes 918 77 77 - ProfServ-Dissemination Agent 1,500 - - - ProfServ-Engineering 14,000 1,167 - 1,167 ProfServ-Legal Services 10,000 833 - 833 PrcfSery-Mgmt Consulting Secy 44,972 3,748 3,748 - ProfServ-Property Appraiser 6,710 6,710 6,710 - ProfServ-Special Assessment 6,200 - - - ProfServ-Web Site Maintenance 1,000 83 83 - Auditing Services 3,914 - - - Postage and Freight 2,500 208 72 136 Insurance-General Liability 15,389 15,389 7,750 7,639 Printing and Binding 1,339 112 217 (105) Legal Advertising 3,700 308 343 (35) Misc-Bank Charges 100 - - - Misc-Assessmnt Collection Cost 8,948 - - - Misc-Web Hosting 900 75 1,612 (1,537) Office Supplies 100 - - - Annual District Filing Fee 175 175 175 - Total Administration 134,365 29,885 21,787 8,098 Page 2 HERITAGE BAY Community Development District General Fund Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Period Ending October 31,2018 ANNUAL ADOPTED YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE VARIANCE($) ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL FAV(UNFAV) Field ProfServ-Field Management 12,688 1,057 1,057 - R&M-Contingency 198 17 - 17 Total Field 12,886 1,074 1,057 17 Lakes and Ponds Contracts-Lake and Wetland 71,200 5,933 5,600 333 Contracts-Water Analysis 9,861 822 - 822 Contracts-Water Quality 27,700 2,308 - 2,308 Contracts-Lakes 30A&308 12,000 1,000 1,000 - Contract-Sediment Testing 6,675 - - - R&M-Aquascaping 8,500 708 - 708 R&M-Stormwater System 4,000 333 - 333 R&M-Lake Erosion 84,713 7,059 - 7,059 R&M-Contingency 8,263 689 - 689 Reserve-Lakes 31,250 31,250 - 31,250 Reserve-Stormwater System 18,455 18,455 - 18,455 Total Lakes and Ponds 282,617 68,557 6,600 61,957 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 429,868 99,516 29,444 70,072 Excess(deficiency)of revenues Over(under)expenditures - (99,483) (29,166) 70,317 Net change in fund balance $ - $ (99,483) $ (29,166) $ 70,317 FUND BALANCE,BEGINNING(OCT 1,2018) 422,265 422,265 422,265 FUND BALANCE,ENDING $ 422,265 $ 322,782 $ 393,099 Page 3 HERITAGE BAY Community Development District 2018 Series Debt Service Fund Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Period Ending October 31,2018 ANNUAL ADOPTED YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE VARIANCE($) ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL FAV(UNFAV) REVENUES Interest-Investments $ - $ - $ 925 $ 925 Special Assmnts-Tax Collector 1,689,155 - - - Special Assmnts-Discounts (67,566) - - - TOTAL REVENUES 1,621,589925 925 EXPENDITURES Administration ProfServ-Arbitrage Rebate 600 - - - ProfServ-Property Appraiser 25,337 25,337 19,629 5,708 ProfServ-Trustee Fees 5,157 - - - Misc-Assessmnt Collection Cost 33,783 - - - Total Administration 64,877 25,337 19,629 5,708 Interest Expense 597,305 - - - Total Debt Service 1,587,305 - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,652,182 25,337 19,629 5,708 Excess(deficiency)of revenues Over(under)expenditures (30,593) (25,337) (18,704) 6,633 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES(USES) Contribution to(Use of)Fund Balance (30,593) - - - TOTAL FINANCING SOURCES(USES) (30,593) - - Net change in fund balance $ (30,593) $ (25,337) $ (18,704) $ 6,633 FUND BALANCE,BEGINNING(OCT 1,2018) 855,432 855,432 855,432 FUND BALANCE,ENDING $ 824,839 $ 830,095 $ 836,728 Page 4 HERITAGE BAY Community Development District 2018 Series Construction and Acquisition Fund Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Period Ending October 31,2018 ANNUAL ADOPTED YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE VARIANCE($) ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL FAV(UNFAV) REVENUES Interest-Investments $ - $ - $ 1,654 $ 1,654 TOTAL REVENUES - - 1,654 1,654 EXPENDITURES TOTAL EXPENDITURES - - Excess(deficiency)of revenues Over(under)expenditures - - 1,654 1,654 Net change in fund balance $ - $ - $ 1,654 $ 1,654 FUND BALANCE,BEGINNING(OCT 1,2018) - - 948,092 FUND BALANCE,ENDING $ • $ - $ 949,746 Page 5 HERITAGE BAY Community Development District Supporting Schedules October 31, 2018 ae �g�bE o X aCe ae ae g ae ae ae ae a ae ae e a ae o as * * ae * as a° — X V 4 0 0 0 0 D� 0 0 $ $ $ m IOe O O O O N O O S OO O CO S pp mm p rm .3 OrO aocop eM b m ' a0 M orcr. ON O QQS 3 M m yy, .- - ^ O am (O m h ^ N) Za m ... CI a (1,1 V 5OV m f0 m m .- Of ar m or nI N 1� [7 m N N N 1 o yy N i r i 1 ~ r' m 8 m m $ m �. $ ti Q $ $ aNa e m Cq m �L+ N M H> V ^ ' m CO N lel m s 7 2 V A m VI a 2 w C 2 a, 19....' " r $ r r A N ^ ^ r A o m m m r eN a `• M r r r r o r $ m V m N ' ' M O ti O ' O ' G r r 7 m O 4 m N d' y m r r � CO r ' 0 o r Q L1 Y 8 m co°D o - a C do m ICI a 9 A m h CO SI Cf r O N - co r- • • m O r r r r o r Q "CI `7 $ r - M fV ^ �- m w IL m r r r eMo o ti m m m r ry m r O r s co r r r n O C r : : : • r ZS- N0 ^ v " �o g$ m Or r O$ m � • o m I: 14. C a m co M < cm] v A OP $ A r ! M • r m r CO r m r N ^ r m o ` o �j m ` . tO' I.) m K 00 Wr CL AM � vi N a co C "O -, MNCO p ' ` 2 m r N . N M OO ti V 1� r V � Y COt tlN - t ^ O O .- cc > O .--- ..- � � m o N A m r p r r r m • A A•� r Q C o 8 " t— 2 0 N m N .- CO0 r Y O O It O O^i'm cobN �- M en to ^ .- E m 01. Y co .- O m p ^ N r r Q � VmN mN Q r Q A / o m m 4 ' m m Or ' r N • • r TO N w O ^ COVA N A 0 V TO N U a y D 00 Ca N8 o N CL 4. 2O0 M 2 .4 c A i E N O -4 Z QQ Q gam! ,J u_ gEn r �W a 7a .� ib 4'Z �' m E v U n _ LL m V Z` 2111i• 1 e I N FS 2 ' �qt fq �p f ,t 8' `5 ; `� _ ,-. 1 ,_M 5 Lqi' U " in mE m rte' E 2 U eB g •L+ o o L IEZ—E �' IE B o ~ O 11111 y a d a 6 a a a a' a 5 a g O Q� 1 ccQ. IV 4.1 E y 5 to N m fn O Q Ce W m H 2 U Aoo 2 O 2 " N m o rn w o of w w m o o , o o ex 2E a ero g pt. N rn O • • N, p pp E O ti O et cri •p .- co Q O, m t0 m CL C Ap �� O N �p Q F h OD 0 O 0 J a 0 O M O AD m o M a g M. K 4 {S� n N �•i�c n r.A vii A m of N {y St 0 y F N N O d t F li 9 M O. Lr A T 0 u N A o v • m N N Om co N O o o a _ O f Z VC 401 l� ' c . . co • may' q r • .- ' ^ N N N N ONI r W N U M N N o Cr, ee V Vn O q q CO 0 0 _ Qm iO pp O P- r, Q 7 C R t .ri n - A m R a I CO CO V V "' caaN13 ' mi" og A C uN _ .nui of ui N N 01 N CO '�• N i !) N N. v N N 0 I' a tti COC pp p T4C 1.41 p�CD N O tD • ' 1 , ' ar AO O Y CO C ta U un E• C, . .l, o N N N N N N c CO ea 0C a lJJ : C S � c c e N _ 10 OS 0 cz St ^m Wa M ' Nm l N w N OCO o' 00 0 n m om II m m m NV V N LL 7 4.4 C CO OD CO 1 Li' t CO m CO po S N S O o 01 Ce 4 O G N CD m HI o co CO CO E0 Z o $ x mco r.+ - �+..' S obi_14 M S `.S_ c • . • - R io is u .'.. cn $ O0 h N N o Z I `_' M N r N m - m O y 1(I ` N 0 tQQt ,n .0 8 re co E 9 d 0 gg R N co a t E 18 gAi = LL ? N • O ° c WIIIIIIH E ,§ Eiyav 3 = Sg 5 maal~ u .b ` 1 eAI El—• E tY � Ts t.t b it fi 2 w Lt W o 22282822 pp p �y s S g z 2 LL 2 0 N 1D NG a2� 8 2 p8 O Q Z N g g H N N m N n s 1t'l HERITAGE BAY Community Development District Cash and Investment Balances October 31, 2018 ACCOUNT NAME BANK NAME MATURITY YIELD BALANCE GENERAL FUND Operating Checking Valley National Bank N/A 0.00% $ 159,739 Money Market Account BankUnited N/A 1.30% 247,146 Subtotal General Fund 406,885 DEBT SERVICE FUND Series 2018 Constr and Acq Fund US Bank N/A 0.00% 949,746 Series 2018A1 Interest Fund US Bank N/A 0.00% 250,344 Series 2018A2 Interest Fund US Bank N/A 0.00% 58,717 Series 2018 PrePayment Fund US Bank N/A 0.00% 3,635 Series 2018 Reserve Fund US Bank N/A 0.00% 389,556 Series 2018 Revenue Fund US Bank N/A 0.00% 127,106 Subtotal Debt Service 1,779,104 (1) Total $ 2,185,989 Note(1) Invested in First American Obligation Fund Report Date: 11/27/2018 Page 8 HERITAGE BAY Community Development District Series 2018 Construction Report Construction Report October 31,2018 Deposit to 2018 Acquisition and Construction Account(Amount from 4/18118) $ 3,461,202 Requisitons (Please see Requisition List) Requisitions Total 2,529,097 Less Requisitions paid In FY17 28,232 Total Requisitions for FY18 2,500,864 Sub-Total $ 932,105 Interest and transfers in Construction and Acquisition Account 17,641 Balance in Construction&Acq Account as of Oct 31,2018 $ 949,746 Report Date: 11/27/2018 Page 9 o_ o c @ a a+ N J C O N ' l co m co 0 co m co CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 0o OD CO CO CO V o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- RRR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 2 rn rn m m 0) a) 0) o o co m o 0 0 0 0 (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co VN N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNN NN M M (` (9 (h M M (0 C) (i co (.0 CO CO co c3 co n n n n N- n n n n N- N- n ti N- n n n N- n n N- r` n O I N 0 d Q c 4 (O Oc N LN O O n Of (N o O O M O O (f) (0 O 0Oc0 N O O N D) LO O N m uj CO O M 00 N cD O N C- 0) O O CO O to n m N C') cO M V N (0 a7A M W N 0 O 0M (n O O (ML) O N O n n V O N 00 co' N (O OD r r r r N 0) cD NI LI) N N r N r (0 O n F N O) z O to U) V3 V3 cc fA to 69 (A (A (A 0 69 69 (A fA E9 V) 0 0 E+9 69 69 0 (9 (A FA EA (A 69 (0 P- nM O O 7 M M NN IIW NN V OV (0 0) 01 O Un M • 0 r MI (00O0rNM N 0 a O A M M nN c(r?; N0 N(0 nnOO 0as > N OOO O OOOOOOOO Q > > > > > > > > zy * zEzzzz zz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z W a a 6 > L L L L U U 2 x E. E. 2 2 2 x 2 2 2 2 2 2 x 2 2 N N 0 0 0 U U U U U a a a > a N •N a a a a a a a a a a a a a U U U > U rn rn .0 -0 -0 a .o a a .n n a U U U U U U U U U U U U U n n EE EEE E • .oa .0a .0 . .0 .0 • E E E > > ce • • cac, ' . ' E . EEE .aE 00 _zu aa "a .E a . a ' cC re re cc re ce cr Cr Cr Cr Cr Cr • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c N U U U U U U U T U 0 ❑❑ 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ N T T T T T T @ T U U U U U U U 0 U 0 U U U O U U U a cc o o@ @ @ @ �. >, >+ >. m m m m m m m m T >. T >. T T T T T T T T @ @ @ m @ C C a) 0) 01 co m a) a) a) m a) m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a o) o) rn a) m a) m ai to w @ =° 3 1° -. (g -• a 0 (,g a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) m = = rn m rn o) rn cg) m m m rn o rn rn m m 9 - a`> a) `a) a, a) a) `a) `m d @ (g ro :° (g :° ° �o ro m C .� .� .� > co 2 x 2 2 x 2 2 2 = x 0 ))) a`) a`) a) a`) CO a`) 0 a`) a`> a) a) 2 2 2 2 d d 11111111111 n N- CO CO n n n n nn CO OD CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO OD ro co CO CO CO fl. LL LL LL LL IL LLL L}L LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLL LL LL LL LL LL LLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O N a UJ m � ✓ C , r N M (f) (O r 00 co O r N (') V (D 1,"-- O O N M M N c0 n ao O) O N • E r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N M • E • V 0) coa w rn J C 0 y = 03 CO CO m CO CO 03 03 CO 03 03 CO m CO CO CO 03 CO CO Cr ® O O Q O E E E E E E E E E E E O E O 0 NNN N (N ` N N N N N Ce O N N V' d' V d' it <t "I' .7 V V a V V V' (` N N r r r r r N N N N N N N N CO r W N O T O1 O) m co 01 Cr) co co O) e- 0 0 N N 0 r.d CO N 0 0 Ln V) 0 U) Ln (3) in (p o O o N LI, U3 m A CO CO O 0 (O 0 0 1` N (O N a N CO N <1' N N ('O V O (D O O (U N C) N O 00 0 00 N CO (n L Q) O '1Z: (O (n N- 03 <� O O M o t• (n h CO n a0 M N V CO V to N O Cr' co- N r COQ) oi (�7 LU O V n r O) Ln 03 r r N 111 N Eft Vi 69 Ef) E!-) U) 4!-) 6.9 H> Vt Ht 69 69 69 EA 69 (f) CO CO N- o n C) <t N v To O O LS oO N N CO O 03 th �j ..... V O co O Or Or 0I- 0, c., r a CO r r N .- r > > * 4t a a a a It * u Z t- O > > Z Z c c > T a c c c 2 CO o^ Z z Z Y Y 2 x m m m r 2 x 2 x ° (°� ( t 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 a = °" = 0 0 0 0 .a c U a 11 E E .a .a (, m m a) .a .0 .o NI- a .o V ., _- .E E m m m ( E E E E re L.j c c o E E E cc ce a LL d a ce cc x ce Q w. C7 OC O m m a 0 m co I '= O O 0 0 v > > ai O O c c v O 0 c CO mmmrn d d i �° mmWLu LlW mamm( 'y ' m m . D CO m m CO a) m CO m 0 m �CD c -- «. x I dm A a m CD 4.1 0 m 2 _ rnrn n > 0) TTm =01 m d CI 7 g m CO COy 2 d - = '' V I 2 2 2 2 2 2 ,` N a CI CI 4-) d 03 CO 03 03 CO CO 03 CO N CO CO CO CO O CO co M O 00 O O E >- >- r r >- 7- i- '7- 7- >- 7- r r i 7- i- > 7- E . in Q. LL IL LL LL LL U.. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL T N O LL d Q d w W :i-. (' 0 E C N M 4 = M V in n Co co O N M LI) (O L� CO E - N N co E M M M M M M a d' v a 'C a a 'C a 'C Ll) U) in - N Q' E L` ILI I0 W Heritage Bay CDD Bank Reconciliation Bank Account No. 9727 Valley National Bank-GF Statement No. 10/18 Statement Date 10/31/2018 G/L Balance(ICY) 159,739.08 Statement Balance 153,688.25 G/L Balance 159,739.08 Outstanding Deposits 13,771.97 Positive Adjustments 0.00 Subtotal 167,460.22 Subtotal 159,739.08 Outstanding Checks 7,721.14 Negative Adjustments 0.00 Differences 0.00 Ending G/L Balance 159,739.08 Ending Balance 159,739.08 Difference 0.00 Posting Document Document Cleared Date Type No. Description Amount Amount Difference Outstanding Checks 10/5/2018 Payment 3417 EDWIN B.HUBBARD 184.70 0.00 184.70 10/26/2018 Payment 3424 FEDEX 11.53 0.00 11.53 10/26/2018 Payment 3425 HERITAGE LAKE PARK CDD 5.77 0.00 5.77 10/30/2018 Payment 3426 CPH,INC 957.72 0.00 957.72 10/30/2018 Payment 3427 FEDEX 36.34 0.00 36.34 10/30/2018 Payment 3428 INFRAMARK,LLC 6,525.08 0.00 6,525.08 Total Outstanding Checks 7,721.14 7,721.14 Outstanding Deposits 10/31/2018 EXCESS FEE Collier Tx Collector,FY18 excess fees G/L Ac 13,771.97 0.00 13,771.97 Total Outstanding Deposits 13,771.97 13,77197 Page 12 O 1O N CO N ID 0 VN' ODD 0 0 0 (00 OO) 0 0 0 w. 0 i4O N CO N n em) N s- a (OO c00 C 0 0 0 O N N 0 0 O do m wy 0 0 0) n O) N N ,- O .{ co O 0 0 0 O m CO m 0 Vi O O O N C! O 0 0) N pp N N o) CO C) VI (A O 0 p h O 1 O e0 7 O) W 49 m o n o 1n co q w (O N I� N < 07 m tli fA W a9 m o n E a O N 0 !A M ( 0) C 0, Lo N 0- m w 0" en N ri UJ f9 !A M 69 m N .o eA W M co (A <A 69 (") Q A N to N 0) CO a 4* C. o n n n n n n n n T- O o 0 0 0 o aWO) Qv- 000000000000000 O) 0 U N CO CO m m I CO m m m 11) 1O h N OCO CO m CO a m f OCOU) CO U) U)J UUN 19 UU ) n U 10 CON U) UUUUUU) U 19 UUU1 UUU1( O r) f- co co fb f7 m t7 m M co N CO 0 0 e, N (O �p a lh f� cb co N C7 O N N O O 00 N 0 0 0 0 N m O O N O 8 W N 0 N CO 0 00000000 ,- 002. 0 ,- 0000000 a 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 ca t7 m m m 0 0 CO 7 7 CO PI (m0 CO CO 01 CO m d 0 m CO CO ) m m if R CO < m V PI CD V — )O U) 10 U) U) 10 0 U) U) U) U) U) U) U) 10 U) U) U) 0 10 u') lO N 0 U) 10 § V CO) C CC i C 1)7 U) -,E. ! C O) '� <n c E c E E A M m ! H 2 r0) n m 0 0 0 ,. . P. m 0 : _- N N W �Ii O) 2222 ) 0) �) 0) O J j 4) 0 ,52) 2 d' M KC C M d 01 d yNC d O W C W d) Q) m W 9C m N l9 V .0 C ea;u_ eOj 0 N co a Y Y C LL C C C C U El C LL y 0 LL N 30 dp 0 p O :12 - N c 3 O O Y Y ) J N W N 0 W W W W •2 LL c N - J c J o z z z m z N N J J 0.1 2S e 2 w z z z z z z 0 d d d c c 'k m m U = la U w w I mm �0 0 tc.0� 8 t°n) in A E a) 3 in 0i `° m t ' ° c "o Y ' c $ a 8• E b o 0 o T L 2 ° c o o ' 0 0 `o y co. a a a a a g g E E E 0 w t a II a a a a a a a a a` a a 8o 5 •1 U m mp p mp (0 m a co i+ CO N N N N N w O m m m F- — 0 — m m m m m m m Cr, Q m L p pO m m r • N CO N (n N V) N N n CO W EO Q N N N N N N N O O a 0 r n N O O O 00 J nnmm = co n I- a s D ` a 2 v) 2 u) a s a a a a co go - .4 I- R C C r Z N O J Q Q Q Q Q 1Qi 2 a N N F ai W O Z a' co co co v) u1 co U O O 4O F- 7 CO CO W CO w F• Z W. LO' a O a co N coco co o O WW o >,.. 0 N a U) w w w w w N H W 0) 2 Z U UZ 2 = 0 F °� V w w w w w w cQ!) Z Z W EE Z LL LL LL W LL Q Q t9 Z (n a 6 �L LL a LL LL W Q m a 0 .... �, O U !- F• H F- Z Z Y w LL ZZ Z W W J W W CL I- 1- F- V- F Y- U Z Z W °: L'� -IC a W > z ZZ Z Z Z Q g a v) w w w 2 n c) 1_ Q' O z Z z z z z > C �1 IP rn m d a w w W W W W 2 W tLLib� cn _z _z o m a > Q z C w w w 1,..) 2W w w w w 2 ,2 U y t W U W W W W w Y Y K Q Q Z O W X. Z m U U U (J U 6 T — qa� c E V co J 0 0 0 0 0 g g m . co 2 m w Q U c) - U W O E c I- w 2 2 2 2 2 a a a a a W W 0 Oz a 2 g § 22 a ' >,r. _ C a aO 0 y Z - m ea E u (� X 0 0 E Q .> CO Of Of 0) O) N N N W t+f 0 ti) Ion n n n n n n fb U1 CD N LL. C CO' V 0 0 CO CO CO c0 0) n O O O O l") W 0 O 0 0) O) O) m O O O O a m W 0 U) O O m m m 10 1n )O (O O A 7, 17+) M M A '0 fb 1 7 N 1) V m m m m m 1n 1n .- � v� 1n cc r) -- � •- Q Q n: a a 00 00 w z z W F I- I N F= 1-- Y UI LU ( O 0 22 Q6 QQ = UI C.90 zzz a o O 1 5 2 2 O O < 0000077 Z Z Z 00000Q C Z Z cq -.< 0 _, _, _,J J g g 55 J J J J J J J o g g > Y Y Y Y F• F 1- 1- Y Y Y Y Y )G >.. F- F- Y ii • Q a a a 4(a a 3 s o 0 0 3 3 0 ° 0 0 0 c.) a a a as g aaa <a ¢ 3 FiW LL Y Y 2 2 2 y y i013. 2222 LL LL LL LL LL. LL W 0 Y Y J _ 00 LL U.z z z z LL z g g 0 0 v g o LL z 0 v Q u z z Z Z Z Z v LL g g 0_ O co co CO m co CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO m CO m CO O� 8 O O a gg O N n O O 0) O) U�) I� vN_ N N N N10 U�) N N Oa O O yy OO% O O) O O) O O O O) O) en O) O) O) O) ; Cr) T OC 0 gOg W OO g O O O O O O O O 0000000000000000 z M ..... rt; W O0 0 0 O00p p O O O O 0 — " — — N N N N N N CO 0 LO 0 !O N CO m O 0) 0 7N mmm) UMm) mC' A m AA AA AaeMaa aMAAa p AA nAg• VVQ W 11 8880000000000000000000000000000 LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Coleman,Yovanovich &Koester, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103-3556 Telephone: (239)435-3535 Fax: (239)435-1218 Page: 1 Heritage Bay CDD July 31,2018 c/o_- File No: 6176-001M 210 N. University Dr. Suite 702 Statement No: 44 Coral Springs FL 33071 Attn: Justin Faircloth Gen Rep SENT VIA EMAIL TO: inframark@avidbill.com Previous Balance $3,917.50 Fees Hours 06/03/2018 GLU Review agenda for Board of Supervisors meeting 0.30 97.50 06/04/2018 AMK ADA research in connection with CDD website. 0.40 50.00 GLU Telephone conference with Chairman regarding license agreement for water use permit; Exchange multiple email correspondence with Rahul John(Club consultant)on license rights; Draft revisions to license agreement; Draft email correspondence to Chairman on same. 1.00 325.00 GLU Draft email correspondence to Chairman on access questions; Review and respond to email correspondence from Chairman on same. 0.30 97.50 06/05/2018 AMK Continue ADA research in connection with CDD website. 0.30 37.50 GLU Review and respond to email correspondence from Chairman on access 0.20 65.00 06/08/2018 GLU Review multiple email correspondence from Chairman on meeting follow-up matters; Respond to Chairman on meeting matters 0.20 65.00 06/10/2018 GLU Review research and analzye information regarding website ADA compliance; Draft email correspondence to Justin Faircloth on research 0.50 162.50 06/11/2018 GLU Review and respond to email correspondence from Chairman on stormwater improvements for Lake 20; Review existing rules on questions raised; Exchange email correspondence with Chairman on Lake 20 issues; Review bonds documents on questions and issues relating to Lake 20; Initial review of Chairman on proposed letter, etc. 1.00 325.00 GLU Exchange email correspondence with Justin Faircloth on website matters; Review information on same. 0.25 81.25 06/14/2018 GLU Review email correspondence from Justin Faircloth regarding HOA license agreement and exhibit 0.10 32.50 06/19/2018 GLU Review and respond to email correspondence from Stella Matevosyan Page 14 Page:2 Heritage Bay CDD July 31,2018 File No: 6176-001M Statement No: 44 Gen Rep Hours regarding update to audit response letter 0.10 32.50 06/26/2018 GLU Research notice requirements and draft notices of public hearing; Initial work on notices 0.50 162.50 GLU Review email correspondence from Justin Faircloth on proposed mutual aid agreement; Review proposed agreement 0.40 130.00 06/27/2018 GLU Review and respond to email correspondence from Justin Faircloth on website 0.20 65.00 GLU Draft notices for adoption of stormwater rules; Draft resolution relating to adoption of stormater rules; Initial work on rules of procedure; Draft notices for adoption of general rules of procedure; Draft resolution for adoption of general rules of procedure 1.00 325.00 06/28/2018 GLU Continue work on draft rules of procedure; Finalize rules of procedure; Draft email correspondence to Justin Faircloth on rules of procedure, notices and resolution, Draft email correspondence to Justin Faircloth on stormwater rules, notices and resolution 0.75 243.75 07/01/2018 GLU Review and respond to email correspondence from Chairman on meeting agenda items 0.20 65.00 07/02/2018 GLU Review email correspondence from Chairman and Manager regarding agenda matters; Exchange email correspondence with Manager on agenda back-up 0.25 81.25 07/03/2018 GLU Review and respond to email correspondence from Justin Faircloth on website 0.10 32.50 07/05/2018 GLU Review and respond to multiple email correspondence from Justin Faircloth on notices for advertisements for rules 0.10 32.50 GLU Follow-up email to Peter Reitz regarding lake rules,etc. 0.10 32.50 07/08/2018 GLU Review email correspondence from Chairman to Quarry on IPW treatment in lakes; Review and respond to email correspondence from Chairman on meeting questions; Review and respond to email correspondence from Peter Reitz on the status of Rules,etc. 0.30 97.50 07/10/2018 GLU Review and respond to email correspondence from Justin Faircloth regarding CPH work orders 0.10 32.50 07/11/2018 GLU Brief review of agenda for Board of Supervisors meeting 0.20 65.00 07/16/2018 GLU Review email correspondence from Tina Fowler on mutual aid agreement transmittal to state; Coordinate same. 0.10 32.50 07/23/2018 GLU Review email correspondence from Justin Faircloth on statewide mutual aid agreement 0.10 32.50 07/24/2018 GLU Review and respond to email correspondence from Diane Manza regarding proposed budget resolutions; Review and comment on same; Draft revisions; Exchange email correspondence with Diane Manza on draft advertisement; Review, revise and comment on same 1.00 325.00 GLU Review email correspondence from Justin Faircloth on executed water use license agreement; Brief review of executed agreement 0.10 32.50 Page 15 Page:3 Heritage Bay CDD July 31,2018 File No: 6176-001M Statement No: 44 Gen Rep Hours 07/25/2018 GLU Review and respond to email correspondence from Justin Faircloth on FEMA claim; Initial review of material from Justin Faircloth 0.20 65.00 07/31/2018 GLU Review email correspondence from Justin Faircloth on public records request (no charge) Professional Fees through 07/31/2018 10.35 3,223.75 07/31/2018 GLU Credit for incorrect entries on Statement No. 42 -341.25 Total Credits for Fees -341.25 Total Current Work 2,882.50 Payments Total Payments Through 08/22/2018 -3,467.50 Balance Due $3,332.50 Page 16 @b031 500 West Fulton Street Sanford,Florida 32771 Invoice Phone:407.322.6841 Justin Faircloth August 17,2018 Heritage Bay Community Development District Project No: H1360$ CIO INFRAMARK invoice No: i lvotc 210 N.University Drive Suite 702 Coral Springs,FL 33071 Heritage Bay Emergency Lake Bank Restoration 10154 Heritage Bay Blvd Naples,FL 34120 Professional Services through July 22.2018 Construction Administration Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Sr.Project Manager 9.25 150.00 1,387.50 Project Engineer 25.00 115.00 2,875.00 Project Coordinator 5.50 90.00 495.00 Sr.Design Technician 6.75 105.00 708.75 Design Technician 234.25 95.00 22,253.75 Administrative 1.06 75.00 79.50 Clerical ii 3.00 60.00 180.00 Totals 284.81 27,979.50 Total Labor 27,979.50 Billing Limits Current Prior To-Date Labor 27,979.50 11,626.75 39,606.25 Limit 80,000.00 Remaining 40,393.75 Total this Phase $27,979.50 Consultants Universal Engineering Sciences 850.00 Total Consultants 850.00 850.00 Total this Phase $850.00 Unit Billing 2018 Mileage 1,308.00 Black&White Plots 24X36 14.40 Black&White 8.5X11 3.25 Color Copies 8.5X11 1.50 Total Units 1,327.15 1,327.15 Total this Phase $1,327.15 Total this Invoice $30,156.65 Page 17 , w .v . c p h c or p . c o m Project H13606 Heritage-Emergency Lake Bank Invoice 110322 Services provided this period include: Preparation of stormwater exhibit,review pay app,sub agreement coordination,site visits and construction observations. Review L5 pipe extension and pre-construction attendance. CPH,Inc, ./6/21a . i ����_)94R Page 18 lip' UNIVERSAL INVOICE 111■41.- ENGINEERING SCIENCES Remit To:P.O.Box 25316,Tam pa,FL 33622-5316 5421 Counl ry Lakt$Oirve.Fl Alyen,FL 33905.Phc no:239.9953991•FSI;239.311.2311 Terms:Net 30 days We accept American Express,Visa. Master Card,Discover,and ACH CPH,Inc. (Corporate) June 29,2018 500 West Fulton Street Project No: 0510.1800827.0000 Sanford, FL 32771 Invoice No: 00313331 Project 0510.1800827.0000 Heritage Bay Lake 30B Bank Restoration Location: Project No H13606, Heritage Bay PO No.: 414806 67S1 Boulevard Naples,FL Professional Services from.June 1,2018 to June 30.2018 Unit Billing Field Density Tests 6/5/2018 WO 980627-1 8.0 each @ 30.00 240.00 6/25/2018 WO 981551-1 4.0 each @ 30.00 120.00 Limerock Bearing Ratio(LBR) 6/5/2018 WO 980627-2 1.0 each @ 250.00 250.00 Proctor Test 6/5/2018 WO 980627-1 1,0 each @ 70.00 70.00 6/5/2018 WO 980627-1 1,0 each @ 70.00 70.00 Trip Charge 6/1/2018 WO 980474-1 1.0 lump sum @ 50.00 50.00 6/11/2018 WO 980932-1 1.0 lump sum @ 50.00 50.00 Total Units 850.00 850.00 Total this Invoice $850.00 Billings to Date Current Prior Total Unit 850.00 0.00 850.00 Totals 850.00 0.00 850.00 P oject# /7//3404. PO# G 7S/ Phase EWA I Task Invoice# •3/333/ Invoice to Data e§-40.00 PO Amount ,570.Op Rernaining 7 7a0_ttn Approval %Ms Data 7�41Vi9 Date Entered 7- -/8 Voucher# 020/5 3% Remittance Address:P.O.Box 25316,Tampa,FL 33622-5316 1/M,p Page 19 Unbilled Detail Friday,August 17,2018 8:58:00 AM CPH,Inc. As of 7/22/2018 Billing Employee/ Hours/ Billing Billing Labor Status Date Reference Description Units Rate Amount Category Project:H13606 Heritage-Emergency Lake Bank Project Number.H13606 Heritage-Emergency Lake Bank Phase Number:XXP Expenses Units: 8 5/30/2018 000000000179 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 5/31/2018 000000000179 J.Morales 8:45 80.0 18Mtleage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 6/1/2018 000000000179 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/2/2018 000000000213 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/3/2018 000000000213 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/5/2018 000000000213 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/6/2018 000000000213 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/8/2018 000000000227 Tampa B: 1.0 B&WCopy @ 0.05 1.00 .050 .050 B 7/9/2018 000000000316 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/10/2018 000000000316 .1.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/11/2018 000000000316 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/11/2018 000000000316 J.Morales 8:45 80.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/12/2018 000000000316 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/13/2018 000000000316 J.Morales 8:45 80.0 18Miteage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 6/10/2018 000000000352 Ft Myers B: 1.0 8&WCopy @ 0.05 1.00 .050 .050 B 6110/2018 000000000352 Ft Myers B:05 16.0 8.5X11 B&W@ 0.05 16.00 .050 .800 B 6/10/2018 000000000352 Ft Myers B:96 15.0 24X38PIots @ 0.96 15.00 .960 14.400 B 6/4/2018 000000000423 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/6/2018 000000000423 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/7/2018 000000000423 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/12/2018 000000000423 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/13/2018 000000000423 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Miteage a 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/15/2018 000000000423 J.Morales 8:45 40.0 18Meage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21,800 B 6117/2018 000000000485 Ft Myers B:05 34.0 8.5X11 B&W 0.05 34.00 .050 1.700 B 7/16/2018 000000000561 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/17/2018 000000000561 J.Morales 8:45 80.018Miteage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/18/2018 000000000561 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 7/18/2018 000000000561 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 7/19/2018 000000000561 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/20/2018 000000000561 J.Morales 8:45 80.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 6/24/2018 000000000654 Ft.Myers B:5 3.0 8.5X11 B&W@ 0.05 3.00 .050 .150 B 6/24/2018 000000000654 Ft.Myers B:5 8.0 8.5X11 B&W c_. 0.05 8.00 .050 .400 B 6/2412018 000000000654 Ft.Myers B:5 3.0 8.5X11 CLR@ 0.25 3.00 .250 .750 B 6/24/2018 000000000654 Ft.Myers B:5 3.0 8.5X11 CLR @ 0.25 3.00 .250 .750 B 6/19/2018 000000000714 J.Morales B:45 40.018MIleage@ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/19/2018 000000000714 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18MIIeage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21,800 B 6/20/2018 000000000714 J.Morales B:45 40.018Mlleage 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/20/2018 000000000714 J.Morales B:45 40.018MIteage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/21/2018 000000000714 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/21/2018 000000000714 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/22/2018 000000000714 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 8 6/22/2018 000000000714 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 7/1/2018 000000000856 Ft Myers 8:5 2.0 8.5X11 B&W@ 0.05 2.00 .050 .100 B 6/25/2018 000000000868 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/25/2018 000000000868 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 8/26/2018 000000000868 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/26/2018 000000000868 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6127/2018 000000000868 J.Morales 8:45 40.0 18Mlleage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6127/2018 000000000868 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6128/2018 000000000868 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage@ 0.546 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/28/2018 000000000868 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage ! 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/29/2018 000000000868 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage@ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 6/29/2018 000000000868 J.Morales 8:45 40.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 Total Billable Units 2,486.00 1,327.150 Page 20 Total for XXP 2,486.00 1,327.150 I 500 tVest Fulton Street Sanford,Florida 32771 Invoice Phone:-107.322.6841'1 Justin Faircloth August 17,2018 Heritage Bay Community Development District Project No: H13607 C/O INFRAMARK invoice No: 110323 210 N.University Drive Suite 702 Coral Springs,FL 33071 Heritage Bay Lake#20 Single Family House Drainage Design 10154 Heritage Bay Blvd Naples,FL 34120-Collier County Professional Services through July 22.2018 SFWMD Permit Modification Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Sr.Project Manager 2.25 150.00 337.50 Project Coordinator 1,00 90.00 90.00 Design Technician 1.00 95 00 95.00 Administrative .25 75.00 18.75 Totals 4.50 541.25 Total Labor 541.25 Billing Limits Current Prior To-Date Labor 541.25 1,523.75 2.065,00 Limit 3,500.00 Remaining 1,435.00 Total this Phase $541.25 Unit Billing Black&White 8.5X11 .05 2018 Mileage 43.60 Total Units 43.65 43.65 Total this Phase $43.65 Total this Invoice 5584.90 Services provided this period include: SFWMD Pre-app and coordination. Preparation of exhibit and project administrative work, CPH,Inc. iiii,.rr�,� 4/ L�%/i� Page 21 . , i I, _ r 1, . C ., In Unbilled Detail Friday,August 17,2018 9:04:03 AM CPH,Inc. As of 7/22/2018 Billing Employee/ Hours! Billing Billing Labor Status Date Reference Description Units Rate Amount Category Project:H13607 Heritage420 Single Fam House Drainage Project Number:H13607 Heritage-#20 Single Fam House Drainage Phase Number.XXP Expenses Principal Name:Satfield,Jeffrey Units: B 7/8/2018 000000000227 Tampa B: 1.0 B&WCopy @ 0.05 1.00 .050 .050 B 7/10/2018 000000000305 J.Jennings onsite meeting B:45 80.0 80.00 .545 43.600 18Mileage @ 0.545 Total for 81.00 43.650 Total Billable Units 81.00 43.850 Total Units 81.00 43.650 Total for XXP 81.00 43.650 Page 22 c ° 1Ia 500 West Fulton Street Sanford,Florida 32771 Invoice Phone:407.322.6841 Justin Faircloth August 17,2018 Heritage Bay Community Development District Project No: H13608 C/O INFRAMARK Invoice No: 110324 210 N. University Drive Suite 702 Coral Springs,FL 33071 Heritage Bay Lake Outfall Structure Replacement 10154 Heriage Bay Blvd,Naples FL 34120 Professional Services through July 22.2018 Fee Percent Previous Fee Current Fee Billing Phase Fee Complete Billing Billing Final Design 5,000.00 100.00 5.000.00 0.00 Pre-Application Meeting 1,250.00 100.00 1,250.00 0.00 Meetings 3.200.00 46.875 805.00 695.00 Total Fee 9,450.00 7,055.00 695.00 Total Fee 695.00 Total this Phase $695.00 Bidding Administration Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Sr.Project Manager .64 150.00 96.00 Totals .64 96.00 Total Labor 96.00 Billing Limits Current Prior To-Date Labor 96.00 2,905.00 3,001.00 Limit 3,000.00 Adjustment -1.00 Total this Phase $95.00 Unit Billing Black&White 8.5X11 .05 Total Units .05 .05 Total this Phase $.05 Total this Invoice $790.05 Page 23 w w w . c p h c o r p . c o m Project H13608 Heritage Bay-Lake Outfall Structure Rep Invoice 110324 Services provided this period include: Coordination with Contractor.CDD Meeting attendance and project discussions. Project status updates and spreadsheet coordination, CPH,Inc. �[Gr'/ i%G1ie—/ Page 24 Unbilled Detail Friday,August 17,2018 9:16:11 AM CPH,Inc. As of 7/22/2018 Billing Employee/ Hours! Billing Billing Labor Status Date Reference Description Units Rate Amount Category Project:H13608 Heritage Bay-Lake Outfall Structure Rep Project Number:H13608 Heritage Bay-Lake Outfall Structure Rep Phase Number:XXP Expenses Principal Name:Satfield,Jeffrey Units: B 7/8/2018 000000000227 Tampa 8: 1.0 R&WCopy©0.05 1.00 .050 .050 Total for 1.00 .050 Total Billable Units 1.00 .050 Total Units 1.00 .050 Total for XXP 1.00 .050 Page 25 co1Aj 41"iii 50(1 West Fulton Street Sanford,Florida 32771 Invoice ['hone:407.322.6841 Justin Faircloth July 20.2016 Heritage Bay Community Development District Project No: 528902 C/O INFRAMARK invoice No: 109792R 210 N.University Drive Suite 702 Coral Springs.FL 33071 Meetings&Miscellaneous Services at 10154 Heritage Bay Blvd.Naples,FL-Collier County Professional Services through June 17.2018 _ 1 Meeting Attendance&Misc.Services Services provided this period include: Board meeting preparation and attendance. General administrative work and coordination with District Manager. Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Administrative 2.00 75.00 150.00 Senior Project Manager .75 170.00 127.50 Project Engineer 5.00 120.00 600.00 Sr.Project Manager 1.75 180.00 315.00 Totals 9.50 1.192.50 Total Labor 1,192.50 Total this Task $1,192.50 Total this Phase 51,192.50 XXP Expenses Unit Billing Black&White 8.5X11 3.40 Total Units 3.40 3.40 Total this Phase $3.40 Total this Invoice $1,195.90 Outstanding Invoices Number Date Balance 110334 8/1/12018 2,568.80 Total 2,568.80 CPH,Inc. 1, h : Page 26 p c u 01 Project S28902 INFRAMARK/Heritage Bay;Meeting&Misc Invoice 109792R Billing Backup Tuesday,August 28,2018 CPI-I.Inc. Invoice 109792R Dated 7/20/2018 2:19:01 PM 1 Meeting Attendance&Misc.Services Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Administrative 73-01184 Lemmermon,Gabriel 1/8/2018 .25 75.00 18.75 review prebill with JMS 73-01184 Lemmerman,Gabriel 1/9/2018 .25 75.00 18.75 prepare and submit billing report 73-01184 Lemmerman,Gabriel 2/5/2018 .25 75.00 18.75 review prebills with JMS 73-01184 Lemmerman,Gabriel 2/6/2018 .25 75.00 18.75 prepare billing report 73-01184 Lemmerman,Gabriel 4/11/2018 .25 75.00 18.75 prepare billing sheet,send to Dianne 73-01184 Lemmerman,Gabriel 4/16/2018 .50 75.00 37.50 Closing bond prep and send to fedex 73-01184 Lemmerman,Gabriel 6/5/2018 .25 75.00 18.75 prepare and submit prebill Senior Project Manager 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 2/5/2018 .25 170.00 42.50 review prebills with brie 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 2/21/2018 .50 170.00 85.00 review notes and comments from CDD meeting Project Engineer 70-01176 Jennings,Joshua 4/6/2018 1.00 120.00 120.00 coordinate with client regarding standard language in contracts 70-01176 Jennings,Joshua 6/7/2018 4.00 120.00 • 480.00 CDD monthly meeting,walk site,travel to and from Sr.Project Manager 73-0183 Satfield,Jeffrey 4/16/2018 .50 180.00 90.00 review and sign closing bond, 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 4/20/2018 .50 180.00 90.00 review site photos 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 6/1/2018 .25 180.00 45.00 review prebill 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 6/11/2018 .50 180.00 90.00 general pm/review upcoming dates,and prebill Totals 9.50 1,192.50 Total Labor 1,192.50 Total this Task $1,192.50 Total this Phase $1,192.50 XXP Expenses Unit Billing Black&White 8.5X11 3.40 Total Units 3.40 3.40 Page 27 Project S28902 INFRAMARK/Heritage Bay;Meeting&Misc Invoice 109792R Total this Phase $3.40 Total this Project $1,195.90 Total this Report $1,195.90 Page 28 Unbilled Detail Tuesday,August 28,2018 2:16:00 PM CPH,Inc. As of 6/17/2018 Billing Employee! Hours/ Billing Billing Labor Status Date Reference Description Units Rate Amount Category Project:S28902 INFRAMARK/Heritage Bay;Meeting&Misc Project Number.S28902 INFRAMARK/Heritage Bay;Meeting&Misc Phase Number.XXP Expenses Principal Name:Satfield,Jeffrey Units: B 5/10/2018 000000000352 Ft Myers B:05 21.0 8.5X11 B&W @ 0.05 21.00 .050 1.050 B 6/10/2018 000000000359 Tampa B: 1.0 B&WCopy @ 0.05 1.00 .050 .050 B 6117/2018 000000000485 Ft Myers B:05 46.0 8.5X11 B&W @ 0.05 48.00 .050 2.300 Total for 68.00 3.400 Total Billable Units 68.00 3.400 Total Units 68.00 3.400 Total for XXP 68.00 3.400 Page 29 0 / Invoice 500 West Fulton Street Sanford,Florida 32771 Phone:407.322.6841 Justin Faircloth September 17,2018 Heritage Bay Community Development District Project No: H13606 CIO INFRAMARK Invoice No: 110502 210 N. University Drive Suite 702 Coral Springs,FL 33071 Heritage Bay Emergency Lake Bank Restoration 10154 Heritage Bay Blvd Naples, FL 34120 Professional Services through August 19.2018 Construction Administration Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Sr.Project Manager 17.00 150.00 2,550.00 Project Coordinator .75 90.00 67.50 Sr.Design Technician 17.75 105.00 1,863.75 Design Technician 77.00 95.00 7,315.00 Administrative 1.00 75.00 75.00 Clerical II 1.25 60.00 75.00 Totals 114.75 11,946.25 Total Labor 11,946.25 Billing Limits Current Prior To-Date Labor 11,946.25 39,606.25 51,552.50 Limit 80,000.00 Remaining 28,447.50 Total this Phase $11,948.25 Unit Billing Black&White 8.5X11 1.10 Color Copies 8.5X11 1.25 2018 Mileage 283.40 Black&White Plots 24X36 ,96 Total Units 286.71 286.71 Total this Phase $286.71 Total this Invoice $12,232.96 Page 30 w w w . c p h c o r p . c o m Project H13606 Heritage-Emergency Lake Bank Invoice 110502 Services provided this period include: SFW MD coordination, contractor coordination,site visits and construction observations,updating reports,site inspections with FEMA, review irrigation damage, bids for new work. CPH, Inc. Page 31 Unbilled Detail As of 8/19/2018 Friday,September 14,2018 10:08:43 AM Billing Employee/ Hours/ Billing Billing Labor Status Date Reference Description Units Rate Amount Category Project:H13606 Heritage-Emergency Lake Bank Phase Number.XXP Expenses Principal Name:Satfield,Jeffrey Units: B 8/2/2018 000000000194 D.Moyer-board meeting B:45 30.0 30.00 .545 16.350 18Mileage©0.545 B 8/1/2018 000000000232 J.Morales 8:45 40.018MIteage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 7/31/2018 000000000354 K.Pearce deliver flash drive B:45 10.0 10.00 .545 5.450 18Mlleage @ 0.545 B 8/8/2018 000000000597 J.Mcrales B:45 40.0 18Mlleage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 8/9/2018 000000000597 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mlleage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 8/10/2018 000000000597 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 8/15/2018 000000000598 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 7/24/2018 000000000670 Tampa B:5 4.0 8.5X11 B&W @ 0.05 4.00 .050 .200 B 7/24/2018 000000000670 Tampa B:5 5.0 8.5X11 CLR @ 0.25 5.00 .250 1.250 B 7/25/2018 000000000689 J.Morales B:45 40.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 40.00 .545 21.800 B 7/26/2018 000000000689 J.Morales B:45 80.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/27/2018 000000000689 J.Morales 8:45 80.0 18Mileage @ 0.545 80.00 .545 43.600 B 7/29/2018 000000000716 Ft Myers B:05 18.0 8.5X11 B&W @ 0.05 18.00 .050 .900 B 7/29/2018 000000000716 Ft Myers B:.0 Plot @ 0.96 1.00 .960 .960 Total for 548.00 286.710 Total Billable Units 548.00 286.710 Total Units 548.00 286.710 Total for XXP 548.00 286.710 Page 32 oai 500 West Fulton Street Invoice Sanford,Florida 32771 Phone:407.322.6841 Justin Faircloth September 14,2018 Heritage Bay Community Development District Project No: H13607 CIO INFRAMARK invoice No: 110503 210 N.University Drive Suite 702 Coral Springs,FL 33071 Heritage Bay Lake#20 Single Family House Drainage Design 10154 Heritage Bay Blvd Naples,FL 34120-Collier County professional Services through August 19.2018 Fee Percent Previous Fee Current Fee Billing Phase Fee Complete Billing Billing Final Design 6,500.00 100.00 6,500.00 0.00 Pre-App Meeting 750.00 100.00 750.00 0.00 Meetings 3,200.00 87.0156 1,884.50 900.00 Total Fee 10,450.00 9,134.50 900.00 Total Fee 900.00 Total this Phase $900.00 Bidding Administration Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Sr.Project Manager 2.00 150.00 300.00 Sr.Design Technician .50 105.00 52.50 Administrative .25 75.00 18.75 Totals 2.75 371.25 Total Labor 371.25 Billing Limits Current Prior To-Date Labor 371.25 0.00 371.25 Limit 3,000.00 Remaining 2,628.75 Total this Phase $371.25 Unit Billing Color Copies 11X17 .35 Total Units .35 .35 Total this Phase $.35 Total this Invoice $1,271.60 Page 33 w w w . c p h c o r p . c o m Project H13607 Heritage-#20 Single Fam House Drainage Invoice 110503 Services provided this period include: SFWMD coordination and finalization of exhibit and project administrative work. Site visit,coordination on bids and construction coordination • CPH,Inc. � � ^'G�� , 711,22,#.22.4„)(2,- Page 34 @ollD 500 West Fulton Street Invoice Sanford,Florida 32771 Phone:407.322.6841 Justin Faircloth September 14,2018 Heritage Bay Community Development District Project No: H13606 C/O INFRAMARK Invoice No: 110504 210 N.University Drive Suite 702 Coral Springs,FL 33071 Heritage Bay Lake Outfall Structure Replacement 10154 Heriage Bay Blvd,Naples FL 34120 Professional Services through August 19.2018 Fee Percent Previous Fee Current Fee Billing Phase Fee Complete Billing Billing Final Design 5,000.00 100.00 5,000.00 0.00 Pre-Application Meeting 1.250.00 100.00 1,250.00 0.00 Meetings 3,200.00 52.1484 1,500.00 168.75 Total Fee 9,450.00 7,750.00 168.75 Total Fee 168.75 Total this Phase $168.75 Total this Invoice $168.75 Services provided this period include: CDD meeting attended and project discussions,project status updates and spreadsheet coordination. • • /Cir CPH,Inc. l,?iy7J/,',I.ZJ� ,/��,64—ej --1A- Page 35 w w r l l i c 0 r !' u 0 500 West Fulton Street Invoice Sanford,Florida 32771 Phone:407.322.6841 Justin Faircloth September 14,2018 Heritage Bay Community Development District Project No: 528902 C/O INFRAMARK Invoice No 110517 210 N.University Drive Suite 702 Coral Springs,FL 33071 Meetings&Miscellaneous Services at 10154 Heritage Bay Blvd.Naples,FL-Collier County Professional Services through August 19.2018 _ 1 Meeting Attendance&Misc.Services Services provided this period include: Preparation of meeting exhibits. Attendance and travel to meetings. Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Design Technician 24.00 95.00 2,280.00 Sr. Project Manager 13.50 180.00 2,430.00 Totals 37.50 4,710.00 Total Labor 4,710.00 Total this Task $4,710.00 Total this Phase $4,710.00 XXP Expenses Unit Billing 2018 Mileage 39.79 Total Units 39.79 39.79 Total this Phase $39.79 Total this Invoice $4,749.79 Outstanding Invoices Number Date Balance 110334 8/17/2018 2,568.80 Total 2,568.80 CPH,Inc. . // / _'/ - _—.A /41., d Page 36 w c p h c o I p i o rn Project S28902 INFRAMARK/Heritage Bay;Meeting&Misc Invoice 110517 Billing Backup Monday,September 17,2018 CPH,Inc. Invoice 110517 Dated 9/14/2018 9:52:21 AM 1 Meeting Attendance&Misc.Services Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Design Technician 70-01225 Zalesanski,Vivian 7/26/2018 5.50 95.00 522.50 Lake Exhibits 70-01225 Zalesanski,Vivian 7/27/2018 4.00 95.00 380.00 Lake Exhibits 70-01225 Zalesanski,Vivian 7/31/2018 4.50 95.00 427.50 Lake Exhibits 70-01225 Zalesanski,Vivian 8/1/2018 4.00 95.00 380.00 Lake Exhibits 70-01225 Zalesanski,Vivian 8/2/2018 3.00 95.00 285.00 Lake Exhibits 70-01225 Zalesanski,Vivian 8/3/2018 3.00 95.00 285.00 Lake Exhibits Sr.Project Manager 73.0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 4/5/2018 2.50 180.00 450.00 Heritage CDD meeting and travel 73-0183 Satfield,Jeffrey 4/10/2018 .25 180.00 45.00 review prebill 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 4/24/2018 .25 180.00 45.00 general PM/review project status 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 5/2/2018 .25 180.00 45.00 review project status/coordination with CDD 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 5/7/2018 .75 180.00 135.00 general pm/review project status 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 5/14/2018 .50 180.00 90.00 General pm/prepare for CDD hearing 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 5/22/2018 .25 180.00 45.00 general pm/review project status 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 8/1/2018 .25 180.00 45.00 review prebill 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 6/15/2018 .50 180.00 90.00 General pm/review project status!coordination with Board 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 6/19/2018 .50 180.00 90.00 CDD Monthly meeting-give project update 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 6/25/2018 .50 180.00 90.00 general pm/review project status&needs 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 7/9/2018 .50 180.00 90.00 general pm/review project status 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 8/2/2018 6.00 180.00 1,080.00 Hertiage Bay Meeting/Travel to and from 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 8/13/2018 .50 180.00 90.00 review last CDD meeting,check schedulng and review current project load Totals 37.50 4,710.00 Total Labor 4,710.00 Total this Task $4,710.00 Page 37 Project 828902 INFRAMARK/Heritage Bay;Meeting&Misc Invoice 110517 Total this Phase $4,710.00 XXP Expenses Unit Billing 2018 Mileage 39.79 Total Units 39.79 39.79 Total this Phase $39.79 Total this Project $4,749.79 Total this Report $4,749.70 Page 38 Unbilled Detail As of 8/19/2018 Monday,September 17,2018 9:10:32 AM Billing Employee! Hours/ Billing Billing Labor Status Date Reference Description Units Rate Amount Category Project:S28902 INFRAMARK!Horitaga Bay,Meeting&Misc Phase Number:XXP Expenses Principal Name:Satfield,Jeffrey Units: B 8!2/2018 000000000194 J.Satfield-Heritage meeting B:45 73.0 73.00 .545 39.790 18Mileage @ 0.545 Total for 73.00 39.790 Total Billable Unite 73.00 39.790 Total Units 73.00 39.790 Total for XXP 73.00 39.790 Page 39 Coleman,Yovanovich&Koester, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103-3556 Telephone: (239)435-3535 Fax: (239)435-1218 Page: 1 Heritage Bay CDD August 31,2018 c/o File No: 6176-001M 210 N. University Dr. Suite 702 Statement No: 45 Coral Springs FL 33071 Attn:Justin Faircloth Gen Rep SENT VIA EMAIL TO: inframark@avidbill.com Previous Balance $3,332.50 Fees Hours 08/01/2018 GLU Telephone conference with Justin Faircloth on Board agenda matters and FEMA reimbursement 0.25 81.25 GLU Review agenda for Board of Supervisors meeting 0.25 81.25 08/02/2018 GLU Follow-up with Justin Faircloth on questions relating to Board meeting; Review and respond to email correspondence from questions from Chair on officer process 0.25 81.25 08/08/2018 AMK Correspond with T. Fowler re: mutual aid agreement. 0.30 37,50 08/14/2018 AMK Draft letter and send out documents for mutual aid agreement. 0.90 112.50 08/15/2018 GLU Exchange email correspondence with Chairman and Manager regarding stormwater fee matters; Brief research regarding the same 0.50 162.50 08/27/2018 GLU Review and respond to email correspondence from Peter Reitz 0.10 32.50 08/31/2018 GLU Preparation for telephone call with Peter Reitz on Quarry matters; Exchange email correspondence with Peter Reitz 0.50 162.50 GLU Review email correspondence from Justin Faircloth on agenda items. 0.10 32.50 Professional Fees through 08/31/2018 3.15 783.75 Expenses 08/14/2018 FedEx(8073)from 34103/ak to 32399/Florida Division of Emergency Mgmt(Attn. Alonna Vinson) 17.11 Total Expenses 17.11 Total Current Work 800.86 Page 40 Page:2 Heritage Bay CDD August 31, 2018 File No: 6176-001M Statement No: 45 Gen Rep Payments Total Payments Through 09/25/2018 -2,882.50 Balance Due $1,250.86 Page 41 @pllD 500 West Fulton Street Invoice Sanford,Florida 32771 Phone:407.322.6341 Justin Faircloth October 10,2018 Heritage Bay Community Development District Project No: H13607 C/O INFRAMARK Invoice No: 111062 210 N.University Drive Suite 702 Coral Springs,FL 33071 Heritage Bay Lake#20 Single Family House Drainage Design 10154 Heritage Bay Blvd Naples,FL 34120-Collier County Professional Services through September 16.2018 Fee Percent Previous Fee Current Fee Billing Phase Fee Complete Billing Billing Final Design 6,500.00 100.00 6,500.00 0.00 Pre-App Meeting 750.00 100.00 750.00 0.00 Meetings 3,200.00 97.5625 2,784.50 337.50 Total Fee 10,450.00 10,034.50 337.50 Total Fee 337.50 Total this Phase $337.50 Unit Billing 2018 Mileage 117.72 Total Units 117.72 117.72 Total this Phase $117.72 Total this Invoice $455.22 Services provided this period include: Meeting attendance,project coordination and status report updates. CPI I,Inc. 0;7/44-44 .---/) /4te..,,,,/,CA/ Page 42 Unbilled Detail Tuesday,October 9.2018 11:13:15 AM CPH,Inc. As of 9/16/2018 Billing Employee! Hours/ Billing Billing Labor Status Date Reference Description Units Rate Amount Category Project:H13607 Heritage420 Single Fern House Drainage Project Number:1113607 Heritage-#20 Single Fain House Drainage for A4 2.50 337.500 Phase Number:XXP Expenses Principal Name:Satfield,Jeffrey Units: B 8/22/2018 000000000824 D.Moyer-pre-construction meeting B:545 216.00 .545 117.720 216.0 1BMileage Q 0.545 Total for 216.00 117.720 Total Billable Units 216.00 117.720 Total Units 216.00 117.720 Total for XXP 216.00 117.720 Page 43 o / 500 West Fulton Street Invoice Phone: Florida 32771 Phone:407.322.6841 Justin Faircloth October 10,2018 Heritage Bay Community Development District Project No: S28902 C/0 INFRAMARK Invoice No: 111068 210 N.University Drive Suite 702 Coral Springs, FL 33071 Meetings&Miscellaneous Services at 10154 Heritage Bay Blvd.Naples,FL-Collier County Professional Services through September 16,2018 1 Meeting Attendance&Misc.Services Services provided this period include: CDD attendance,project updates and coordination,general administrative meeting planning. Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Sr.Design Technician 1.00 105.00 105.00 Administrative .50 75.00 37.50 Sr.Project Manager 2.00 180.00 360.00 Totals 3.50 502.50 Total Labor 502.50 Total this Task $502.50 Total this Phase $502.50 Total this Invoice $502.50 Outstanding Invoices Number Date Balance 110334 8/17/2018 2,568.80 Total 2,568.80 CPH, Inc. i//I Page 44 Project S28902 INFRAMARK/Heritage Bay;Meeting&Misc Invoice 111068 Billing Backup Tuesday,October 9,2018 CPH,Inc. Invoice 111068 Dated 10/10/2018 1:51:17 PM 1 Meeting Attendance&Misc.Services Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Sr.Design Technician 70-01068 Allen,John 9/4/2018 1.00 105.00 105.00 Projects updates Administrative 73-01184 Lemmerman,Gabriel 9/13/2018 .50 75.00 37.50 general administrative and meeting planning Sr.Project Manager 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 8/20/2018 1.00 180.00 180.00 Review project and update 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 9/11/2018 .50 180.00 90.00 review upcoming meeting schedule and review Heritage project updates 73-0163 Satfield,Jeffrey 9/13/2018 .50 180.00 90.00 Project review Totals 3.50 502.50 Total Labor 502.50 Total this Task $502.50 Total this Phase $502.50 Total this Project $502.50 Total this Report $502.50 Page 45 k Y o2•ffi u. i E:2 S 5. ,.,g0, a _ d '',i LP$¢ c b. oa 2 $pp 0 P 8 mtiVg m � v �i.s 1.� m m F a F o.q 4, a „_ki kj P K a E$ F'-,E.1.- m rn d M � _ 9 a 84 ' rQ j j 8 t o 75 t288 8 os - m ., o o V 8 500 m 8 -'" _$$V°3EE4203 all 2 g 3t u 5 8 e 6 ag . . m C Q e E E E E E§ $ c 3 g g m 5 ] g m 41 u les E 8�° , E➢S 6m@ MST iiia q 1 It 4 n e 3 -E a ,g," 0. 2' :m82W R `3 "m l _ktt E. d ° $ t c m -.q 8 RN u� ` §B.r = 4 .�, ET i E LL m¢E-s 9 sU .'ds-; a2...e 2.�x`N z 3E .. _ `c$v v 3w a 'S.' rrrtim m vim p' TV:- E m 'E a f u g ffi v m E $ C 2 e m _ JF n ¢ n Ea a a a a a. . o o t P E E. E E P E "E: E E.: E a.: E E E E E.. °w' E c a c a c . . go 0 0. o N O O' O 8 O O O O O p O C . O U V c. U U U, U V U V U U U U V V U — O V.. — O O G. F C O g F. O p' o n. . N CO g o 6n tn $O N CO COO ' N N N O y 3M 4) .. F v ' Ei Y v CO O E Om Z -moi o ®. e c I . .�: i. * Y c .. � • f °�� , m E I I N I h I d I 8 I O I V r I I I I:.O I } I O 1 4' r o o N v T0 3 JU nOsi N N d Cl N 6 0 N M N C 0 d $ < N m W Q Oo o v It- o 8 � O 0 EnI d O O 8 NaBEE d O 0 0 o ,`0' c O F t00dm § O 8 „ K :-- N O m m G Ni M a N - 8 O, . O V n N Od N mc, M Lr, i i< V ' _ et i n r o r n r n n n4 n ro m m 00 m m 0 6v. N N N O N O_ N c N A [J ? •;- e--,.., es _ 4_ N _ a n n a a ro x ✓ m ,. w a a rc - c Y a 32 c 1 ..; a. gc 5 r a .n- R E c u i c g • E zgc A c o g c c m F. d t. 9 8 ; n K a i E f - S i o c o c m c 6 m t. A EE' Ey e.. °f. E Q in :P. u c6 g n v 4 = Qt 3 z° Q �O m 7 m b op C Q B a,.; 0 m :g rn A.o w 4 g rn , ^ g'. 8 0 Y c 3 N a b q d O Y2 3 C o a § O 3 0 I..: M E' ,y m e e x . E m W o y qEE� _ �' L d v S S 2.. a▪ ¢ S mm� v m J S S a S _'B '1 m S ] 7 = Q O E J O O. 1 6 O 0. 0 O o m 6 6 0 1 a U 3 7 4 IL ❑: g 1 U l7>: �1 V U U U K V D U U 6 0 U U M U' O K J 7 V m N. U Q t_ F HERITAGE BAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Motion to Assign Fund Balance as of 9/30/18 The Board hereby assigns the FY 2018 Reserves as follows: Operating Reserves $95,041 Reserves— Lake Erosion $14,687 Reserves—Lakes FY18 $93,750 Reserves—Stormwater System FY18 $18,455 Reserves—Loan 4,750 Employee Direct Deposit Enrollment Form District Name: Heritage Bay CDD To enroll in Full Service Direct Deposit, simply fill out this form and return it to Inframark payroll department. In addition to this form, please attach a voided check, not a deposit slip, for each checking account listed below. If depositing to a savings account, ask your bank to give you the Routing/Transit number for your account as it isn't always the same as the number on a savings deposit slip. Below is a sample check MICR line, detailing where the information necessary to complete this form can be found. i:Q.231,5&78t: I234567R9se 0ICI noutingftensit a Cheek p IAe-digLt hunter always Checking Amount k (this number Metttle&the mender In between these tWo nusitti$ the upper right earner of tiro alteak— not needed for sigrrupt Important! Please read and sign before completing and submitting. I hereby authorize Heritage Bay CDD to deposit any amounts owed to me, by initiating credit entries to my account at the financial institution(hereinafter"Bank")indicated on this form. Further, I authorize Bank to accept and to credit any entries indicated by Heritage Bay CDD to my account. In the event that Heritage Bay CDD deposits funds erroneously into my account, I authorize my account to be deducted for an amount not to exceed the original amount of the erroneous credit. This authorization is to remain in full force and effect until Heritage Bay CDD has received written notice from me of termination in such time and in such manner as to afford Heritage Bay CDD reasonable opportunity to act on it. Employee Name: Social Security#: Employee Signature: Date: Account Information Please be sure to specify the amount or percentage to be deposited into each account if depositing into more than one. The total percentage must equal 100%. 1. Bank Name/City/State: Routing/Transit#: Account#: ❑ Checking ❑ Savings ❑ Other I wish to deposit$ or❑ Entire Net Amount 2. Bank Name/City/State: Routing/'Transit#: Account#: ❑ Checking ❑ Savings ❑ Other I wish to deposit$ or❑Entire Net Amount 3. Bank Name/City/State: Routing/Transit#: Account#: 0 Checking D Savings 0 Other I wish to deposit$ _or 0 Entire Net Amount N FRAMARK INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SERVICES Heritage Bay CDD 10/26/18 — Field Management Report :.., .p�..� . ' + f 6, .. _ } s Ar- I ,. ms'_ , �x , is XPi &i www.inframa rkims.corn Inspected on:10/26/18 by: Brandon Romine&Tim Hall 1. Lake Management All Lakes are in need of treatment for algae and a large amount of Illinois pond weed was present in several lakes. o yr r" e t ;x � :.3 ^' ;moi -- a,+ , max :, Y S x . a A , j, a. Algae on Lakes: 5,6,8,,,1,5 .&30B north bank littoral shelf. ux a .�., y t p 4 �: *1 iii • h .y z,'''., F ., A: .. .�, • �y rRt b. Littorals: i. Alligator Flag in Lakes: No issues observed. Inframark Monthly Management Report 1 ii. Lakes Sprayed: No issues observed. iii. Littoral Shelf: Lake 4 and 30B(North Littoral Shelf pictured) have a high algae and torpedo grass density. k , ,4,'---.-,,,,.-:,-,-.1. ' 4044-.y?$ - %' 't5avg Z 1, , c, Weeds: Alligator Weed in Lakes: No issues observed. is Brazilian Pepper: Still present on Lake 6 lake bank near L6L20 control structure.f t,.t }' ,r Cattails in Lakes: Observed in Lake 2&5. � � ' "b t> ms �,�� : eft € � 1t .F '' '. ),1 17.-...f24$4.4,-.-..J::-.„.:- ,',',,,',,,,,?t.i.,.',....:-;.- "'s.,----: ' ,0,....4%,.. ;.N.-tw.,4.4.t- - . ' ,7'''',..? ' , , - `4,'`,,,,'i.-.'4.,"'44,. "t".1,,zit--4-,,,,,, '4 *"" tti i,***4--- i 4' - 1 %it{ 4 SLC i' fif:i .' '*c ,, Inframark Monthly Management Report 2 Climbing Hemp Vine in Lakes: Observed on bank plantings on the north end of Lake 7& within Lake 11. a rro: f arrows s # ''fit'' ;;?-4,,, m*" Dollar Weed in Lakes: No issues observed. v:, Hydrilla in Lakes: 28. Hrii. Illinois Pond Weed in Lakes: High density in lake 12,14,20,26, &27. aV e P1 Inframark Monthly Management Report 3 ak Y.` f` -t 2 Y' 'iii. Palms on Lake Banks: No issues observed. >', Red Ludwigia in Lakes:9. 1e � x !e (# y t� �� y( j„ �l1,ki. ,iior x, Sedges in Lakes: No issues observed. x . Spatterdock/Lily Pads in Lakes: 5. 4,,;,,,,,,Liiiil,4.:-,:::,. ''. '''' Inframark Monthly Management Report 4 I Torpedo Grass in Lakes: 4,20(pictured),&30B north bank littoral shelf. x ' Various Submerged weeds in Lakes: Chara noted in Lake 6. ':,,,,IS: .n"'" lir I96. d. Rocks: No issues observed. e. Bulkheads: No issues observed. f. Clippings in Lakes: No issues observed. Inframark Monthly Management Report 5 2. Lake Bank Erosion Step erosion noted on bank of Lake 10. F- �s Washouts forming around rip rap on the south bank of Lake 19. Wit- S t. 3. Storm Drainage System R. Control Structures: i. Basin 1: Control Structure L3L10 was flowing. ii. Basin 2: Control Structure L6L20 was flowing.Control Structure L12L20 was flowing. iii. Basin 3: Control Structure L25L30 was flowing. iv. Basin 4&5: Control Structure L28L30 was flowing. Inframark Monthly Management Report 6 v. Basin 6:Control Structure L3000003 was flowing. • b. Drains: Drains near 30B on Fairway 20 covered by sod. fib 1 ay Y.: � 5 v,k 4.' .w-Okla ,. + ^ 4. Roadway Catch Basins: No issues observed. Catch Basins: No issues observed. Inframark Monthly Management Report 7 Inter-Connect/Drain Pipes: Major overgrowth over drain on the northeast corner of 30A left over from the Lake Bank Restoration Project Phase I work.The vendor will be contacted to remove the sediment filter materials. • Illicit Discharges: No issues observed. . Lake Drainage Pipes: No issues observed. 4. Fish/Wildlife Observations: ®Bass ❑ Bream I Catfish ❑Gambusia Turtles ❑ Egrets ❑Herons I Coots n Gallinules ❑Snakes nAnhinga ❑ Cormorant ❑Osprey ® Ibis Woodstork ❑Otter F Alligators Other: _(1,, Inframark Monthly Management Report 8 S. RCSldentlal CompiaintS/COncernS: Broken sprinkler valve behind unit 10498-201,could cause lake bank erosion. s . '(, g . 7,°h . ' s �. a , �€ ,' i t 'y Sidewalk and irrigation ,. '-.:'-:3-,,,, - '''',.4:'..','',-::,,f,',14.':4: ,,.'110 1'4.-.^: i repairs continue to be in process. `. &�J' t 3�KTP U� 4�Ev f, '^'""�`I „.. w2 iii rc ), a , ..,—....,-;:,---V;ti k. - :'..., ,. . .44117-'''' 6. Non-CDD Issues: No issues observed Inframark Monthly Management Report 9 6 I N FRAMARK INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMEN T SERVICES Heritage Bay CDD 11/30/18 — Field Management Report 4 `f i�,A �" f ,;:„:.,..0,,,,,,,.... ---,'cq_.. w .b :.- :""5r www.nframarkims.com Inspected on:11/30/18 by: Brandon Rornine&Tim Hall 1. Lake Management All Lakes have been treated for Illinois pond weed.Some pond weed still visible, but there has been a significant improvement since last site visit. Lake 17 pictured. 4 a. Algae on Lakes: 4,8, 14,&27. P i' fI • b. Littorals: i. Alligator Flag in Lakes: No issues observed. ii. Lakes Sprayed:No issues observed. Inframark Monthly Management Report 1 iii. Littoral Shelf: Lake 4 has a high algae and torpedo grass density. i a+ 1 C. Weeds: Alligator Weed in Lakes: No issues observed. ii. Brazilian Pepper: Noted in Lake 2 along north corner, Lake 6 which appears to have had branches trimmed but was not completely removed. z "' ", ? ° of w • M os� r Cattails in Lakes: No issues observed. 2 Inframark Monthly Management Report Iv. Climbing Hemp Vine in Lakes: Observed on bank plants on Lake 27. fi v, Dollar Weed in Lakes: No issues observed. Hydrilla in Lakes: Noted in Lake 6. vii. Illinois Pond Weed in Lakes: Low density in Lakes 27 plivF` ''" viii. Palms on Lake Banks: No issues observed. Inframark Monthly Management Report 3 . , . , . es: 2&6. .-,-.4.',.Ttse,P,:','`., :;,,-`,1•,;v....-,,N.,4,--,, ix. Red Ludwigia in Lak -,,, ,..,•,:t' '- i, 'f'>_to..,f'-' ' — '$,'',f.,C--:5`:.'.',.1 -' '•7. 'wk . • . -.,.., ,ir':-,',Ik.44YA, 1 .. .. . , ., ,.... , , , ,- -1-'',4•Pe-,--.1,N.T.A . -7, - , 4, :v.- - ' .',., - •, s•-t'z.-" ''''''' ---,...*;...., .7,,,z-•,,e7.kr,i,-, •,';i;-,,-...,-,7.:ki..0! , 7„------,• - ---1,7,•,:tAtt,,zie.4 -;, .7 i'tk.4z,,,..,,,,,,,s,*Ii.I.-7.74-,_,..-' • .,7',...,,,,, ,',-;..-.,,,,..• , -"'• ,,,P,...,,i.i , .., .,,--,,t-- 4r•- -77.---,-,-- 7in-, 4,- x. Sedges in Lakes: No issues observed. - -- xi. Spatterdock/Lily Pads in Lakes: 3. . , _ . _ • _" . --i1. _ . .-''''.....; ,---.-•-,,,--: inLakes: XiIi7st:;;Or;edoGrass High density noted in Lake 20&27. - , ,--.,.l'' *-.Aitar ---4:-.9.-.4,-A;,,,,,,-----,:-i,;-•-t,..4.,:ir,,,,,,,„.. _ , .. _____,„..,,,„,-.,..,..-,, ,,-.,rv'---- - ..,- .xiitple!---1-41.- ----•.- 4,,,77*,--,:i.' ....' - `'" -,--.6„7,-.7...-z. :,,,:`..,, ,:',;;,...i-:`,.4,'_,!`c`..,!..../..--% , .,„i„.. - _ 7,i,;,44,-...;1;014t,..„,•,-,-,,,f0;,,r,,,,Iraltv.„-. 11,•,-.1:1t.'"?: ::;,,,,,,Iv.„1.4,,,,z,J,,,,,,l,t..,,!1<„;,,Im-r4,-;:',::,,';'_',,„,,,,,,t,„_:4,.„,,,,,r.,,., ,:;7,;.•=31.:V e:ZIts;',, ' --.4e.*17.1, '''''.-,,i,4,t,..*., %-..,,,'Z',,,,,t.-i-r';;4;4,,,,,,,,,,,•••,_.:',1,...;1.--, , 4-Aft,•;,,- Klii'''.: , - 4 , i I ! 1 Inframark Monthly Management Report l xiiH Various Submerged weeds in Lakes: Chara noted in Lake 6. ws ix d. Rocks: No issues observed. e. Trash in Lakes: No issues observed. f. Bulkheads: No issues observed. g. Clippings in Lakes: No issues observed. 2. Lake Bank Erosion ,t, Erosion noted on Lake 5 Southwest corner seems to be caused by a damaged sprinkler head undermining tree root system. J yes , .t.. Inframark Monthly Management Report 5 . , b. Lake 19 Southeast bank. '1k • .,„ . Lake 19 South bank along cart path , , 7 4- *t6i , - I . • 777,..i',;_tt.:f,4;;;4-A: , . . . Lake 9 Southwest lake bank • . ..• . 6 Inframark Monthly Management Report e. Lake 11 pipe exposed due to erosion t l ss-•,,-=---,.....'•;:•;::::-:...... 3. Storm Drainage System a. Control Structures: i. Basin 1: Control Structure L3L10 was flowing. ii. Basin 2:Control Structure L6L20 was flowing.Control Structure L12L20 was not flowing. n!". ; V Offe ►�lTill�g - MW wasicwaor L..)..,? ', , , 7,=„,,,AN- r , ... 0 4,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,.,* z II Inframark Monthly Management Report 7 iii. Basin 3: Control Structure L25L30 was not flowing. I w"Rip laipp 1,,,,, „,,,,, 40,... , or 0, . .,,,,,, ,, 0IE 10 Iv .' ,.,” ' 44,04 ,i, it4 • ,, , , ts„,‘,.... . .,.... „ k'.. iv. Basin 4&5:Control Structure L28L30 was flowing. 1.T.,,A, .", • • . -,.. , tk,:itt a 1 ,44 41, '` # s r jy z v. Basin 6: Control Structure L30000O3 was flowing. e 4 v ,,,,,..4.4..,-,1*.'," ' - ' — I, ,---, - . : ,,4. - . , - .,—7,, : , , ..„ — ..‘ , ,1,, .. ... 4,,,,,„•.,-t„.. , ,Aor b. Drains: No issues observed. Inframark Monthly Management Report 8 c Roadway Catch Basins: No issues observed. d, Catch Basins: No issues observed. e. Inter-Connect/Drain Pipes: No issues observed. I. illicit Discharges: No issues observed. g Lake Drainage Pipes: Exposed disconnected pipe visible in Lake 9. 144, I; .fig x t 4. Fish/Wildlife Observations: M Bass U Bream n Catfish n Gambusia ®Turtles U Egrets n Herons Coots n Gallinules Snakes Anhinga n Cormorant ❑Osprey Ibis Woodstork n Otter ®Alligators l Other: 4 ". Inframark Monthly Management Report 9 5. Residential Complaints/Concerns:Broken sprinkler valve still in need of repair behind unit 10498-201,could cause lake bank erosion. Sidewalk and Irrigation repairs remain underway. Inframark Monthly Management Report 10 6. Non-CDD Issues: Excessive fertilizer on cart path along Lake 18, could enter lake and affect water chemistry. 14:V10,04bi'4 • r Inframark Monthly Management Report 11 TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. f yv MARINE &ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 3584 Exchange Avenue,Suite B ❑ Naples,Florida 34104-3732 ❑ (239) 643-0166 ❑ Fax (239) 643-6632 MEMORANDUM TO: Heritage Bay CDD Board%Justin Faircloth FROM: Tim Hall DATE: November 12,2018 RE: Illinois pondweed (Potomogeton illinoensis) treatment in Lakes 30 A&B This memorandum is being provided to try and give CDD Board members and interested members of the community a little information on Illinois pondweed and the efforts underway to try and control it in Lakes 30A and 30B of Heritage Bay. Background Illinois pondweed is a native aquatic plant that ranges throughout the Unites states. It grows rooted to the bottom and has both submersed and floating leaves. This plant is able to propagate through tubers, rhizomes,and seeds. Ecological Importance Pondweed provides; - forage and cover for aquatic animals, - refuge for small fish and invertebrates, - uptake of nutrients within the water, - stabilization of shorelines through roots and rhizomes. Potential Problems Pondweed may; - form dense mats that block sunlight from other submersed plants, - Interfere with fishing,boating,or swimming, - Cause decreases in dissolved oxygen levels if dense populations die out, - Create aesthetic issues when dense mats cover water surface - Can create blockages to flow when dense mats break off and block stormwater outfalls The lake contractor currently working for the CDD uses two methods to try and control the pondweed. Their contract sets a fixed fee of $1,000/month to control weeds within these lakes regardless of the methodology employed. 1 Page The first method of control is herbicide applications which are used when water is not flowing out of the lakes into the adjacent canal.The size of the lakes and the volume of water within them would make this an expensive operation to treat the entire lake because of the cost of the chemicals and the amount needed to treat the volume of water within these lakes. There are potential adverse impacts that could be realized if all of the pondweed were eliminated via chemical controls as discussed later in this memorandum. The second method used is physically cutting the weeds below the water level and then raking the cut material out of the lakes. Costs associated with this are mostly equipment operation and manpower costs to rake all of the material up. Raking never removes all of the cut material so there is an aesthetic component from remnants of the dead material along the shoreline. Illinois pondweed does not depend on broken stem fragments to propagate as some other aquatic weeds do but it can propagate from them and so cutting could potentially help spread the plant to other areas of the lakes. In the case of these lakes,the plant is already present all around and throughout so cutting is not likely to have any impact on spreading it more. Alternative Methods of Control I am familiar with two other methods of control that could be utilized, both have pros and cons associated with them. The first is placement of a mat of blanket over segments of the pondweed. The"blanket" is an opaque (usually black) plastic or pvc sheet placed over the pondweed and suspended 1 to 2 feet up off of the bottom. This in essence suffocates the pondweed by not allowing any light penetration to it but still allows fish and aquatic organisms to swim around and under it. The blankets are then moved around to different areas of the lake to control the densest population of the weed.This is a non-chemical control so does not put any harmful substances into the water, but it is labor intensive and can cause a boating hazard if water levels are too shallow for vessels to pass over without getting tangled in the blanket. Heavy storms or active water flow can also make the blankets difficult to keep in place. The second alternative is a biological control that has been used successfully in other areas and was a method suggested by Dennis Giardina,who is the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) Invasive Plant Management Specialist for the Everglades region. Triploid grass carp are a genetically modified fish that feed on aquatic vegetation such as pondweed and can help to control it. There are permits required to use the fish and certain physical barriers that are required as part of the permitting to keep the fish in the lakes designated. The barriers can be designed to be removed in the case of storms so that water flows are not blocked by storm debris as the barriers are usually placed to protect the landowner's investment in the fish and keep them from escaping. Additionally,means to keep the carp out of the littorals areas may be required by the SFWMD. Issues to consider These lakes are not swimming pools and should not be considered as such. Some vegetative component is necessary to the health and vitality of the lakes. Completely eliminating all of the pondweed through chemical or alternative treatments could result in other adverse conditions such as poorer water quality (no plants to take up excess nutrients in the water),poorer water clarity(more nutrients available to algal components),increased bacterial counts(also due to excess nutrients),more susceptibility to erosion and sloughing(due to loss of roots stabilizing soils),and lower fish populations (due to loss of refugia and 21Page cover for nursery stock). When I spoke with Mr. Giardina, he informed me that the FWC has been trying to get pondweed established in Lake Trafford following massive restoration efforts which included dredging and invasive weed controls. They have so far been unsuccessful but see it as a plant that can provide a lot of benefits to a lake ecosystem.Mr.Giardina also offered to come and speak to interested parties about pondweed and other lake aquatic vegetation as well as controls should the Board or Committee desire a presentation. The monthly contract currently in place is not sufficient to eliminate pondweed from these lakes but my recommendation is that total elimination should not be the goal of the control program. As outlined above in this memo,some aquatic plant component is necessary for a healthy lake system. The budget to control the pondweed should be increased if the same methodologies are going to be continued. The monthly contract has not resulted in the spread of pondweed.Spraying during the dry season when water is not flowing out of the lake and cutting during the wet season does help to control the coverage but is only just barely enough to keep up with the natural growth of the plant. Based on issues that I have been made aware of, interference with boating and water skiing are two issues that are driving the request for additional controls and reduction in the coverage of pondweed. It might be necessary to more aggressively target the areas where these activities are taking place and not worry so much about the entire lake and shorelines. Recommendations We need a better way of determining the actual coverage of pondweed and tracking its growth during the course of the year. An aerial survey conducted every month would provide repeatable,measurable estimates of the changes in coverage. This could be done from the water or using drone technology. A modification to the lake contract could also be made to require densities to be kept below certain levels in different areas of the lakes. Cutting of the material is a preferred methodology as this type of pondweed is not as aggressive in terms of propagating from cuttings as other species. The cutting is also very species specific and does not add chemicals to the water.Investigations should be made into alternative cutting methodologies that might make collection of the cuttings easier. Investigations into stocking the lake with triploid carp could be undertaken.Stocking rates of 5-15 fish per surface acre or pondweed coverage are usual. Fish cost between$5 and$15 per fish. Control can take 6 months to a year to be effective. Permits would be needed,and barriers would have to be installed so the costs of the barriers would need to be added into the overall cost. On a long-term basis this should reduce the frequency and cost of the current herbicide and cutting. Sincerely, Tim Hall Senior Ecologist 31Page Aquatic Weed Harvester Puller, Cutter& Skimmer Page 1 of 3 SHOREtech p 877.224.4899 L_J `Yc b ff<LP RVE-ST zR lake weed & €'rlfry3 `rt ;'� ''' ..31'+'..- '---',- tO\''k ,, re „..--._ 7 -. ' - ,TM� \. e"'fax;». yM. ..yy� .n 11 ,.P! k '' r a 'k 1 `.q'^ A 6 400k,311. I The Eco Harvester is an environmentally friendly aquatic plant harvesting machine and the only harvester of its kind that pulls the weeds from their roots instead of cutting them like ALL other aquatic weed harvesters! It is 95%effective at uprooting milfoil, hydrilla, celery grass,water chestnut, and most other aquatic plants prevalent in ponds, lakes, rivers, channels, canals, and beachfront property. The Eco Harvester is easy to use and doesn't require any technical training to operate like most other aquatic weed harvesters. It is the most manageable and least invasive method for removing lake weeds with minimal lake bottom disruption compared to other harvesters, chemicals, dredging, and dewatering. Best of all, it only requires one person to unload, operate, and trailer. In essence it is a one-person operation from start to finish! http://www.lakeweedharvester.com/eco-harvester/ 12/11/2018 Aquatic Weed Harvester Puller, Cutter& Skimmer Page 2 of 3 Eco Harvester I Sales Video I vid 1 of 9 The Eco Harvester was initially designed to help control Milfoil, but is able to help with so many other aquatic plants and weeds.We're proud to be able to offer a machine that is more versatile and effective than traditional aquatic weed harvesters. It is able to cut weeds like most traditional harvesters, but the EcoHarvester is special because it can pull weeds up from the roots and skim weeds, debris, and algae off the surface. It works in more shallow water around docks, piers, or marina slips! Most important is that it is affordable for lake associations, conservation management, municipalities, and lake shore maintenance contractors because it is 1/3rd the cost of any other comparable weed harvester/cutter. Features/ Benefits • Affordable-One-third the price • Aluminum hull - Lighter and of traditional harvesters rust resistant • Eco-friendly- No chemicals or • Reduced draft-Operate in dredging as little as 12"of water • Easy to operate- One-person • Increased capacity-30% operation from start to finish additional cubic yards! • Versatile - Pulls, cuts, &skims • Wider Hull - Improves weeds in shallow water operational stability! http://www.lakeweedharvester.com/eco-harvester/ 12/11/2018 Aquatic Weed Harvester Puller,Cutter& Skimmer Page 3 of 3 • Multi-purpose-Gathers • Hard pipe hydraulics floating debris and algae - Improves durability and • Quality engineered --Well built design! & lifetime warranty on hull • Dynamic flow intake-95 % • Effective lake management effective weed pulling! - Uproots aquatic weeds • Standard components including milfoil - Universal repair & replacement parts Brochure Pr01 icing Video - Image gallery Simply put,the Eco II is the most versatile&effective eco-friendly aquatic harvesting tool available for the price! Please fill out the form on our contact form or call us for product pricing, specifications, trailer options, productivity rates, or a business pro forma explaining how this one-of-a-kind machine can make &save you money! Manufactured and sold by Lake Weeders Digest LIC - 5701 International Pkwy, New Hope, MN 55428- phone:877-224-4899 ©The Weeder's Digest 2017 http://www.lakeweedharvester.com/eco-harvester/ 12/11/2018 Lake &Wetland MANAGEMENT OCTOBER INSPECTION REPORT October 22, 2018 Mr. Justin Faircloth Heritage Bay Community Development District c/o Inframark Management Services Justin.faircloth@inframark.com 5911 Country Lakes Drive (239) 245-7118 Office Fort Myers, Florida 33905 (239) 245-7120 Fax Description Below observations were noted on Saturday October 20th. Lake 1 - No Issues Lake 2 - Chara, Steams Flat Bladderwort, (medium density) Lake 3 - Stems Flat Bladderwort, (medium density) Lake 4 - Chara, Limnophila, (low density) treated 10/19/18 Lake 5 - Algae, Pondweed (low density) observed Lake 6 - Pondweed, Hydrilla (low density) observed Lake 7 - Algae (medium density), Hydrilla and Pondweed (low density) treated 10/20/18 Lake 8 - Algae, Chara, Hydrilla, Pondweed (medium density) treated 10/20/18 Lake 9 - Pondweed (medium density) observed Lake 10 - Algae, Stems Flat Bladderwort, Pondweed (medium density) treated 10/20/18 Lake 11 - Pondweed (medium density) Lake 12 - Pondweed, banana !illy (medium density) Lake 13 - No Issues Lake 14 - Pondweed dying from treatment Lake 15 - Algae (very low density) Lake 16 - Pondweed issue resolved. No issues observed Lake 17 - No Issues Lake 18 - No Issues Lake 19 - Pondweed (medium density) treated 10/19/18 Lake 20 - Pondweed (high density) algae (low density) treated 10/19/18 Lake 21 - Algae (very low density) observed Lake 22 - No Issues Lake 23 - No Issues Lake 24 - No Issues Lake 25 - No Issues Lake 26 - Pondweed (low density) torpedo grass (low density) treated 10/19/18 Lake 27 - Pondweed, algae (low density) Lake 28 - Hydrilla (low density) Lake 29 - No Issues Lake 30A & 30B - Pondweed (high density) groundcrew on site to remove cut pondweed debris 10/6/18, truxor on site 10/20 and 10/21 harvesting pondweed. Lake and Wetland Management, Inc.Orlando-Tampa (239)313.6947 Office • (239)313-6950 Fax • westcoast@lakeandwetlandcom • www.lakeandwetland com October Inspection Report Page 2 In summary, other than lakes 30A and 30B, all lakes in good condition and all issues being monitored closely and treated as frequently as possible. With the dropping water levels, treatments should start becoming more effective. We will continue using the Truxor and ground crew to remove pondweed from 30A and 30B. Please let us know of any issues observed. �G � jQref Gonzalo Ayres Lake and Wetland Management Orlando-Tampa, Inc. Gonzalo.Ayres@Lakeandwetland.com (239) 580-8711 cell Lake and Wetland Management,Inc.Orlando-Tampa (239)313-6947 Office • (239)313-6950 Fax • westcoast@lakeandwetland.com • www.lakeandwetland.com Lake &Wetland ) MANAGEMENT NOVEMBER INSPECTION REPORT November 26, 2018 Mr. Justin Faircloth Heritage Bay Community Development District c/o Inframark Management Services Justin.faircloth@inframark.com 5911 Country Lakes Drive (239) 245-7118 Office Fort Myers, Florida 33905 (239) 245-7120 Fax Description Below observations were noted on Saturday November 16th. Lake 1 - No Issues Lake 2 - Treated for stem flat bladderwort on 10/20/2018 Lake 3 - Treated for stem flat bladderwort on 10/20/2018 Lake 4 - Chara (low density) treated 11/16/2018 Lake 5 - Hydrilla, Chara, Pondweed (low density) treated 11/16/2018 Lake 6 - Following treatment for pondweed, Hydrilla, Chara from 10/20/2018 Lake 7 - Following treatment for pondweed, Hydrilla, Chara from 10/20/2018 Lake 8 - Following treatment for pondweed, Hydrilla, Chara from 10/20/2018 Lake 9 - Chara, pondweed (low density) treated 11/16/2018 Lake 10 - Treated for stem flat bladderwort, pondweed on 10/20/2018 Lake 11 — Following treatment for pondweed, 9/21/18,chara (very low density)treated 11/16/18 Lake 12 - Pondweed (medium low density), Chara (low density) treated 11/16/18 Lake 13 - No Issues Lake 14 - Pondweed stll dying from treatment Lake 15 - No Issues Lake 16 - No issues Lake 17 - Hydrilla (very low density) observed Lake 18 - No Issues Lake 19 - Following treatment for pondweed 11/9/18 Lake 20 - Following treatment for pondweed, 10/19/18 Lake 21 - No Issues Lake 22 - No Issues Lake 23 - No Issues Lake 24 - No Issues Lake 25 - No Issues Lake 26 - Hydrilla, Chara (very low density) observed Lake 27 - Pondweed (low density) observed Lake 28 - Following treatment for Hydrilla, Chara, 10/31/2018 Lake 29 - No Issues Lake 30A & 30B - removed cut debris. 11/10/2018 Lake and Wetland Management,Inc.Orlando-Tampa (239)313.6947 Office • (239)313-6950 Fax • westcoast@lakeandwetland.com • www.lakeandwedand.com November Inspection Report Page 2 In summary, other than lakes 30A and 30B, all lakes in good condition and all issues being monitored closely and treated as frequently as possible. Water is still not low enough. We will continue using the Truxor and ground crew to remove pondweed from 30A and 30B. Please let us know of any Issues observed. 97(A/Wiyfre-f Gonzalo Ayres Lake and Wetland Management Orlando-Tampa, Inc. Gonzalo,Ayres@L.akeandwetland.com (239) 580-8711 cell Lake and Wetland Management,Inc.Orlando-Tampa (239)313.6947 Office • (239)313-6950 fax • westcoast@lakeandwetland.com • www.lakeandwetland.com Lake Management-Wetland&Preserve Maintenance Lake & \A1 e t 1 a n d Erosion Restoration-Mosquito&Midge Larvae Control Algae&Aquatic Weed Control -Native Planting ��—,/.. ) MANAGEMENT Water Testing&Analysis-Fountains&Aerators SERVICE&INSPECTION REPORT > /r7C, Customer:._____.._l. -'�___ Account#: �.� ._--_-w�f Date: � �/ �� Technician: /r •Iyet J Territory: /fi cti Weather Conditions: _._._•,5"V C"'fy LAKE NSA AGEMENT �!� ALGAE CONTROL Lake(s)#:____ $ ❑ GRASSES&EMERGENTS Lake(s)#: ❑ SUBMERSED AQUATICS Lake(s)#:______-__ ❑ FLOATING PLANTS Lake(s)#:_____..__. .___.___—__...___.._ ❑ INSPECTION Lake(s)#:_ ❑ DEBRIS Lake(s)#: Water Test Results(Combined Average) Temperature _..! °F ❑HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW Dissolved Oxygen .ppm 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW pH reading __._. ❑ACID 0 NEUTRAL 0 BASE Water Clarity 0 GOOD 0 FAIR ❑ POOR • Water Level ❑HIGH ❑ AVERAGE 0 LOW Q LITTORAL SHELF SHELVES#: ❑ SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS ❑HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL • FLOATING PLANTS 0 MANUAL REMOVAL ❑ INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION 0 UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE PRESERVE(S)#: _ ❑INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES ❑HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL 0 GRASSES ❑MANUAL REMOVAL ❑VINES 0 INSPECTION 0 MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL LAKE(S)#: []INSECTICIDE TREATMENT 0 INSPECTION Comments: / 'Inc' 7721.2/ 1734'47.91-4'n: 41-.E../7---,c. /7242-3-00,-ii7 r©f PONDWPlP,, l22GC-✓35E /- r,t- 2L ? — IO..- ,. .0 566- /i C---27./ tT5 , FISH&WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS FISH: 0 Bass °Bream 0 Catfish 0 Grass carp 0 Tilapia 0 Mosquitofish 0 Shad BIRDS: 0 Raptor °Duck 0 Wood Stork ()Shorebird 0 Wading bird 0 Songbird 0 Vulture REPTILES: O Alligator °Snake 0 Turtle °Tortoise O Lizard °AMPHIBIANS 0 INSECTS INVASIVE/EXOTIC PLANTS NOTED °Brazilian pepper OMelaleuca OPennywort OBischofia 0Earleaf Acacia °Australian pine OShoebutton °Sedge °Climbing Fern °Air potato OTorpedograss OAzolla OSalvinia ODownyrose myrtle°Java plum °Floating Hearts °Lantana OHydrilla OHygrophilia °Water Lettuce OWater hyacinth°Cattail OPrimrose OAlligatorweed NATIVE PLANTS NOTED °Cypress O Wax Myrtle OFL Pine °Red Maple O Waterlily °Mangrove °Pond Apple °Oak OCocoplum O Bulrush °Blue flag iris ()Strangler fig ()Arrowhead OPickerelweed °Thalia O Palms OGoldenCanna°Spikerush OButtonbush 0Eelgrass 0 Cordgrass OFakahatcheegrassOSpatterdock 0 Ferns ()Baby tears 0 Naiad OChara 0 Duckweed 0 Bladderwort OPondweed 0Slender spikenish0Bacopa Other species noted/comments:__ www.lakeandwetland.com Rev 07/23/14 FcrmY3980 LakeManagannemt-VVetXamd&PreserxeMainmnamce Lake Wetland Erosion Re�w,ouimm-88nsqw�m&NYidgeLarvae Cnmtr*l �� �� J& � �& � � y� � � T A��*e�AmuaticVN�ed�mntro� �ax�weP/�n#wg Water Testing&Analysis'Fountains&Aemators SERVICE & INSPECTION REPORT Customer: � 4 Account#: 12 rDate: /00//e Technician:__-�-� L47` ' Terrhory:_ A`4Y te Weather Conditions: �\� c/znr' �. / / - ' - ' - - 0LAK� NAGE)�ENT ���� ON / GAECONTRQL Lake(s) #: ��'____ ____ { 14 &EMERGENTS Lake(s)#: / �U8K�ERSEDAQUAT|[S Lake(s)#: --- rn� ------ ------/ PLANTS Lake(s)#:__�'�� � ' -_- _ ------ ----------- iwe INSPECTION Lake(s)#: r" 41-7r0 ' ----------- [] DEBRIS Lake(s) #:_______________ Water Test Results(Combined Average) ' Temperature ^F []HIGH []AVERAGE 0 LOW Dissolved Oxygen ppm 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW ( pH reading 0AOD [] NEUTRAL 0B��E ` Water Clarity --_-_-_ 0 GOOD [] FAIR 0 POOR Water Level 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW i �� LITTORAL SHELVES �� .-__ j SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL D FLOATING PLANTS 0 MANUAL REMOVAL D INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION i 0 UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE PRESERVE(S)#: []INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL []GRASSES C]MANUAL REMOVAL []VINES []INSPECTION . 0MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL LAKE(S)#: []INSECTICIDE TREATMENT 0 INSPECTION • Ctmnrmem*m:_ ~C | ,14.:.:24 ' ' �r^�c.c/t/ ?-. -- /m .0 /3 rs: ! __- ___ ___ FISH&WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS ----- FISH: 0 Bass °8sam 0 CattisGrass carp 0 Tilapia 0 —' —' 0 Shad BIRDS: [ R*pm, CWood Stork - Shorebird - Wading OSongbird [ Vulture REPTILES: 0m °Snake 0 Turtle - Tntub' - Luani 0mw' ' /mAms 0 INSECT ~MVVASI0E/EXOTICPLmNTsNOvED ()Brazilian pepper 0&4ela|euca C)Pennywort OBischofia {]Earleuf Acacia °AusuaUanpine{}Shoebutton 0 Sedge °cUmb/"gFom °Avpomto OTorpedograss0AznUa 05a(vinia {�Oo-�o rose ^~ myrtle HnobHearts ^0 {J�amano (�|�ydh|b Oro C)v��c,Lo��ce C}v��'hyo�v� (� hCi> {}prim - m �e A||igmm,weed NATIVE PLANTS NOTED {}[yp,e`, {}Wax Myrtle OFLPine {}Red Maple 0 Waoe,|ily °81aogrovr C}PondApp(e {}oak {)[ocop|um 0 Bulrush )ueflag iris [)stmng|e,Ag Arrowhead [}pickmre|weed Thalia ()Palms {JGuidwnCanna 05pikpmuo {}Rvunnbush 0[e|g,uss 0[o,de,a,s JFak'| tch ' raa spattendnck 0 Ferns o Baby tears 0Naiad OCharaJDvckweed 0 Bladderwort 0Pondwo:d 0 Slender spikerush 0 Bacopa Other species noted/comments: _____ __ ____________ ____ Lake Management-Wetland&Preserve Maintenance 1�&f�� �� l �� ��| �� Erosion Resora*ion Mosquito Midge Larvae Control *7L -- -- A/gaa&AquabcVVeed[ma�a| 'Na�vePlanting MANAGEMENT Water Testing&Amalyuio-Fmwntains&Aerators SERVICE & INSPECTION kEPORT . Customer: Account#: /VW Date: 24/02e//, Technician: 7»Ut"c ))~e-i9 Territory: Weather Conditions: �-�� , ��KE �� ��� Lake(s) :?,_3' ---- —'-^ [] EMERGENTS Lake(s) �y5VBMER5EDAQUATCS Lake(s)# 0 G PLANTS Lake(s)#: gg |N5PECT|ON Lake(s)#: " c [] DEBRIS Lahe(s)#:____________________________________________' Water Test Results(Combined Average) Temperature ^F []HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW Dissolved Oxygen .ppm []HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW pHeading __-__- OAO[} 0 NEUTRAL [] BASE Water Clarity -_' 0 GOOD [] FAIR 0 POOR Water Level _______ []H|GH 0AVER�GE 0LOW o LITTORAL SHELF SHELVES#: [] SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS []HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL [] FLUADNGPLANTS []k8ANUALRE/WOVAL | [] INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION ° UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE pRESERyE(S)#: ____________________________ []INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL []GRASSES []MANUAL REMOVAL []VINES []INSPECTION 0MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL LAKE(S)#:__ OINSECTICIDE TREATMENT 0 INSPECTION ~�~�� Comments: *`���� /~^����� — ��2��L� ^7F� /27 11- ^�� �-~ i~� ��4? / ' ^ / -- _____ ' _ _-��� � . _ =.e __ _ - - ________--_' FISH&VmLDupE OBSERVATIONS FISH: 0 Bass 0 Catfish 0 Grass carp 0 Tilai {}Mo,quitu0sh 0 Shad BIRDS: 0Raptor °Duck 0 Wood Stork 0 Shorebird 0 Wading bird 0 Songbird 0 Vulture REPTILES: {JAlligator OSnake 0Tv,de C}Tortoise 0/ba,n 0«/wpmoiAms 0 INSECTS INVASIVE/EXOTIC PLANTS NOTED Brazilian pepper OMelaleuca OPennywort OBischofia {}EodevfAcacia °Aust,o|ianpine{}Shoebuttv" {]Sedge []O|mbingFe'n ()Air potato OTorpedograss 0Azo|fa {}Sa/vinio C}nowo`rose myrtleOiava plum C)F|oudnnMe^,t^ C)Lonmna OHydrilla OHygrophilia CJWa»erLeuucp C}Wate,hyacinth()Catti| C)p,in`,ose {JNUgatn,*rcd NATIVE PLANTS NOTED OCypress {]Wax Myrtle OFL Pine C}Red Maple 0 mmtrdi/y 0xangnvvc {JPnnd8pp|e C}Oak [ocop|um {]Bulrush OBIue flag iris {}Stmng|e,fig 0 Arrowhead OPickerelweed Thalia Jpa|m, }6o|den[anno°Spikerush ]B ttonbu,h ]E |g� 0C rd' [ Fakahonhegm,,[ Spattendock 0Ferns C8abytears 0 Naiad OChara °ovckweed 0 Bladderwort []Pvnd°eed °5|ende,,oikem,h{]nacopv Other species noted/«wnmmems:___ wwwlakeandwetBa°=d com Rev 07/23/3I Form^`98, pp /�*7 Lake Management-Wetland&Preserve Maintenance Lake & Y Y e 1}. j a n d Erosion Restoration-Mosquito&Midge Larvae Control Algae&Aquatic Weed Control -Native Planting Q�� MANAGEMENT Water Testing&Analysis-Fountains&Aerators r SERVICE&INSPECTION REPORT Customer: T12t'n l.�0,2. �O�y Account#: Date: I Q-ZZ- 1 T 8 Technician: -Derry I Territory:.--____-- _.__ Weather Conditions: -D+ 0 LAKE MANAGEMENT Cl ALGAE CONTROL Lake(s)#: __._ ❑ GRASSES&EMERGENTS Lake(s)#:.,_-____ jil SUBMERSED AQUATICS Lake(s)#: 3015 _ o FLOATING PLANTS Lake(s)#; D INSPECTION Lake(s)#: y DEBRIS Lake(s)#:_- Water Test Results(Combined Average) Temperature __. °F 0 HIGH D AVERAGE 0 LOW Dissolved Oxygen ppm 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW pH reading 0 ACID 0 NEUTRAL 0 BASE Water Clarity _...___ 0 GOOD 0 FAIR 0 POOR Water Level 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW 0 LITTORAL SHELF SHELVES#:____,____. O SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL O FLOATING PLANTS 0 MANUAL REMOVAL. O INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION Q UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE PRESERVE(S)#: ❑INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL. ❑GRASSES 0 MANUAL REMOVAL OVINES 0 INSPECTION 0 MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL LAKE(S)#:, ❑INSECTICIDE TREATMENT 0 INSPECTION Comments;_., —11-vxor 4rl S(tr.. harvt.5-1if25 tvardit'cu=1 Fra-. 30 FISH&WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS FISH: 0 Bass °Bream 0 Catfish 0 Grass carp 0 Tilapla 0 Mosquitofish 0 Shad BIRDS: 0 Raptor °Duck 0 Wood Stork Q Shorebird O Wading bird °Songbird 0 Vulture REPTILES: 0 Alligator °Snake 0 Turtle °Tortoise 0 Lizard °AMPHIBIANS 0 INSECTS INVASIVE/EXOTIC PLANTS NOTED °Brazilian pepper 0 Melaleuca OPennywort OBischofia 0 Earleaf Acacia °Australian pine OShoebutton °Sedge °Climbing Fern °Air potato OTorpedograss OAzoIIa OSalvinla ()Downy rose myrtle°Java plum °Floating Hearts °Lantana OHydrilla QHygrophilia °Water Lettuce °Water hyacinth°Cattail OPrimrose QAlligatorweed NATIVE PLANTS NOTED OCypress 0 Wax Myrtle OFL Pine °Red Maple 0 Waterlily °Mangrove °Pond Apple 0Oak OCocoplum °Bulrush OBlue flag iris °Strangler fig °Arrowhead OPickerelweed °Thalia °Palms ©Golden Canna°Spikerush OButtonbush 0 Eelgrass 0 Cordgrass OFakahatcheegrassOSpatterdock 0 Ferns °Baby tears 0 Naiad OChara °Duckweed 0 Bladderwort 0Pondweed OSlender spikerush0Bacopa Other species noted/comments:_—_-_ ____---_- -----_____ __._. ._ ____._......— wwwelakeandwetland.com Rey 07/23/14 Form R 3980 Lake Management-Wetland&Preserve Maintenance *Lake s _V_ r e t 1 a n d Erosion Restoration-Mosquito&Midge Larvae Control Algae&Aquatic Weed Control -Native Planting MANAGEMENT Water Testing&Analysis-Fountains&Aerators SERVICE&INSPECTION REPORT Customer:_1-tt;!:TA_ae, ___.._. Account#: Date: --_to 23- ii 8 Technician:___PCxrry Territory: Weather Conditions: _Dry ©LAKE MANAGEMENT ❑ ALGAE CONTROL Lake(s)#: ❑ GRASSES&EMERGENTS Lake(s)#:_ ,_� ❑ SUBMERSED AQUATICS Lake(s)#:___._. ❑ FLOATING PLANTS Lake(s)#: ❑ INSPECTION Lake(s)#: -- i] DEBRIS Lake(s)#:_._ ".. OFWater Test Results(Combined Average) Temperature °F ❑HIGH 0 AVERAGE El LOW Dissolved Oxygen ppm 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE E1 LOW pH reading _._. ,____,. 0ACID 0 NEUTRAL ❑ BASE Water Clarity _ ❑GOOD 0 FAIR 0 POOR Water Level El HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 l i_OW LITTORAL SHELF SHELVES#: __.-- ❑ SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS ❑HERBICIDE TREATMENT Q DEBRIS REMOVAL ❑ FLOATING PLANTS 0 MANUAL REMOVAL ❑ INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION 0 UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE PRESERVE(S)#: ❑INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT ❑ DEBRIS REMOVAL ❑GRASSES 0 MANUAL REMOVAL_. ❑VINES ❑INSPECTION Q MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL. LAKE(S)#: ❑INSECTICIDE TREATMENT 0 INSPECTION Comments; C 7P l(1y old ra I i h) 3oB FISH&WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS FISH: 0 Bass °Bream 0 Catfish 0 Grass carp 0 Tilapia OMosquitofish 0 Shad BIRDS: 0 Raptor ODuck 0 Wood Stork 0 Shorebird 0 Wading bird 0 Songbird 0 Vulture REPTILES: 0 Alligator °Snake 0 Turtle 0 Tortoise 0 Lizard 0 AMPHIBIANS 0 INSECTS INVASIVE/EXOTIC PLANTS NOTED °Brazilian pepper 0 Melaleuca QPennywort OBischofia OEarleafAcacia °Australian pineOShoebutton 0 Sedge QClimbingFern °Air potato OTorpedograss QAzolla OSalvinia °Downy rose myrtle OJavaplum °Floating Hearts °Lantana OHydrilla OHygrophilia OWater Lettuce OWater hyacinth OCattail QPrimrose OAlligatorweed NATIVE PLANTS NOTED °Cypress O Wax Myrtle OFL Pine °Red Maple O Waterlily °Mangrove OPond Apple °Oak 0Cocoplum 0 Bulrush °Blue flag iris °Strangler fig 0 Arrowhead QPickerelweed OThalia 0 Palms 0Golden CannaOSpikerush OButtonbush 0 Eelgrass 0 Cordgrass OFakahatcheegrass°Spatterdock 0 Ferns 0 Baby tears 0 Naiad OChara 0 Duckweed 0 Bladderwort 0 Pondweed 0 Slender spikerushO Bacopa Other species noted/comments:__ www.lakeandwetland.com Rev 07/23/14 Four ti398D Lake Management-Wetland&Preserve Maintenance Lake & w e t i a n d Erosion Restoration-Mosquito&Midge Larvae Control Algae&Aquatic Weed Control -Native Planting l ``•�__�) MANAGEMENT Water Testing&Analysis-Fountains&Aerators SERVICE&INSPECTION REPORT Customer: Hu-late i 1ate -Ba`/ l Account#'--.. Date: 10 — f -18 `/ / Technician: 1Darrr Territory: Weather Conditions: °LAKE MANAGEMENT El ALGAE CONTROL Lake(s)#: — ❑ GRASSES&EMERGENTS Lake(s)#: El SUBMERSED AQUATICS Lake(s)#: ❑ FLOATING PLANTS Lake(s)#:W_„___. ❑ INSPECTION Lake(s)#: , ,,DEBRIS Lake(s)#: O Water Test Results(Combined Average) Temperature _.______°F 0 HIGH ClAVERAGE 0 LOW Dissolved Oxygen _ppm 0 HIGH El AVERAGE 0 LOW pH reading .-__ 0 ACID ❑ NEUTRAL 0 BASE Water Clarity ❑GOOD ❑ FAIR 0 POOR Water Level 0 HIGH ❑ AVERAGE El LOW 0 LITTORAL SHELF SHELVES #: 0 SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS ❑HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL ❑ FLOATING PLANTS 0 MANUAL REMOVAL ❑ INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION 0 UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE PRESERVE(S)#:___ ❑INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES ❑HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL ❑GRASSES 0 MANUAL REMOVAL 0 VINES 0 INSPECTION 0 MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL LAKE(S) #: __ _ — _ ❑INSECTICIDE TREATMENT ElINSPECTION Comments: ra a cl C.1',fp-r n q S rc..• (�Kc 3Q 13 FISH&WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS FISH: 0 Bass OBrearn 0 Catfish 0 Grass carp 0 Tilapia Q Mosquitofish 0 Shad BIRDS: O Raptor °Duck O Wood Stork 0 Shorebird 0 Wading bird °Songbird 0 Vulture REPTILES: 0 Alligator OSnake 0 Turtle 0 Tortoise 0 Lizard 0 AMPHIBIANS 0 INSECTS INVASIVE/EXOTIC PLANTS NOTED ()Brazilian pepper 0 Melaleuca OPennywort C)Bischofia 0 Earieaf Acacia ()Australian pine OShoebutton ()Sedge °Climbing Fern ()Air potato OTorpedograss QAzolla QSalvinia °Downy rose myrtle°Java plum °Floating Hearts °Lantana OHydrilla OHygrophilia °Water Lettuce °Water hyacinth()Cattail °Primrose OAlligatorweed NATIVE PLANTS NOTED OCypress O Wax Myrtle OFL Pine Q Red Maple Q Waterlily °Mangrove °Pond Apple Q Oak °C:ocoplum °Bulrush °Blue flag iris ()Strangler fig 0 Arrowhead OPickereiweed °Thalia 0 Palms °Golden Canna()Spikerush OButtonbush 0Eelgrass OCordgrass OFakahatcheegrassOSpatterdock 0 Ferns OBabytears 0 Naiad OChara °Duckweed 0 Bladderwort OPondweed °SlenderspikerushOBacopa Other species noted/comments: www.lakeandwetland.com Rev 07/23/14 Form 4398D Lake Management-Wetland&Preserve Maintenance Lake &Wet 1 a n d Erosion Restoration-Mosquito&Midge Larvae Control Algae&Aquatic Weed Control -Native Planting ......� MANAGEMENT Water Testing&Analysis--Fountains&Aerators SERVICE & INSPECTION REPORT zy /1 Customer: 1rsG..._. _... _w — Account# _....__�� Z /O Date: /� Technician: /ICA _/i Territory: /tt i,W Weather Conditions: S(/Nn/� 1. 0 LAKE MANAGEMENT // C] GAE CONTROL Lake(s)#: IIWGRASSES&EMERGENTS Lake(s)#:,-_-3 19; 20 El SUBMERSED AQUATICS Lake(s)#: — ❑ FLOATING PLANTS Lake(s)#:--- -----------_____._-_... —_ ❑ INSPECTION Lake(s)#: O DEBRIS Lake(s)#: _ ___ ___.___ Water Test Results(Combined Average) Temperature ____°F 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW Dissolved Oxygen ppm 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW pH reading _ 0 ACID 0 NEUTRAL 0 BASE Water Clarity 0 GOOD p FAIR 0 POOR Water Level 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE ❑ LOW O LITTORAL SHELF SHELVES#:, ❑ SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS ❑HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL . ❑ FLOATING PLANTS 0 MANUAL REMOVAL O INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION O UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE PRESERVE(S)#: �._ .._.._ ❑INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL. D GRASSES 0 MANUAL REMOVAL • D VINES 0 INSPECTION 0 MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL LAKE(S)#: 0 INSECTICIDE TREATMENT 0 INSPECTION 3 - ?- o a yl 7-0,e- ,z ,s. _ FISH&WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS FISH: O Bass °Bream O Catfish O Grass carp O Tilapia O Mosquitofish 0 Shad BIRDS: 0 Raptor ODuck 0 Wood Stork 0 Shorebird 0 Wading bird 0 Songbird 0 Vulture REPTILES: O Alligator °Snake 0 Turtle O Tortoise O Lizard °AMPHIBIANS O INSECTS INVASIVE/EXOTIC PLANTS NOTED °Brazilian pepper 0 Melaleuca OPennywort OBischofia 0 Earleaf Acacia °Australian pine0Shoebutton °Sedge ()Climbing Fern °Air potato OTorpedograss OAzolIa Osalvinla °Downy rose myrtle°Java plum °Floating Hearts °Lantana OHydrilla OHygrophilia °Water Lettuce OWater hyacinth°Cattail OPrimrose OAlligatorweed NATIVE PLANTS NOTED °Cypress O Wax Myrtle OFL Pine °Red Maple 0 Waterlily °Mangrove °Pond Apple OQak OCocoplum °Bulrush OBlueflag iris OStrangler fig °Arrowhead OPickerelweed ()Thalia °Palms OGolden Canna°Spikerush 08uttonbush 0 Eelgrass 0 Cordgrass OFakahatcheegrassOSpatterdock 0 Ferns 0 Baby tears 0 Naiad OChara °Duckweed 0 Bladderwort OPondweed 0 Slender spikerushOBacopa Other species noted!comments:__-_—_--_______.-__--___..-- wwwwlakeandwetlandmcom Rev V/23/14 Fon R 3980 Lake Management-Wetland&Preserve Maintenance *Lake & Wetland Erosion Restoration-Mosquito&Midge Larvae Control Algae&Aquatic Weed Control -Native Planting k ....t....1111111111,220 MANAGEMENT Water Testing&Analysis-Fountains&Aerators SERVICE&INSPECTION REPORT Customer: I-I tiSie Y Account ft: Date: I o23 t Technician: avi ry Territory: Weather Conditions: .PrZ OLAKE MANAGEMENT O ALGAE CONTROL O GRASSES&EMERGENTS Lake(s)#: LI SUBMERSED AQUATICS Lake(s) #: O FLOATING PLANTS La ke(s)#: 0 INSPECTION Lake(s)#: X] DEBRIS Lake(s)#: B Water Test Results(Combined Average) Temperature oF 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE LOW Dissolved Oxygen ppm 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW pH reading 0 ACID 0 NEUTRAL 0 BASE Water Clarity 0 GOOD 0 FAIR 0 POOR Water Level 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW 0 LITTORAL SHELF SHELVES#: O SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL O FLOATING PLANTS 0 MANUAL REMOVAL 0 INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION 0 UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE PRESERVE(S) #: El INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL 0 GRASSES 0 MANUAL REMOVAL 0 VINES DINSPECTION 0 MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL LAKE(S)#: 0 INSECTICIDE TREATMENT 0 INSPECTION IP".11V1 Comments: re-K-4- C.A.qe1 n:ss roe- cie..c 3 0 B ASH&WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS FISH: 0 Bass °Bream 0 Catfish 0 Grass carp 0 Tilapia 0 Mosguitofish 0 Shad BIRDS: 0 Raptor °Duck 0 Wood Stork 0 Shorebird °Wading bird 0 Songbird 0 Vulture REPTILES: 0 Alligator °Snake 0 Turtle °Tortoise 0 Lizard C)AMPHIBIANS 0 INSECTS INVASIVE/EXOTIC PLANTS NOTED °Brazilian pepper 0 Melaleuca OPennywort 0 Bischofia 0 Earleaf Acacia C)Australian pine 0Shoebutton 0 Sedge °Climbing Fern ()Air potato OTorpedograss 0 Azolla OSalvinia °Downy rose myrtle°Java plum 0 Floating Hearts °Lantana OHydrilla OHygrophilia °Water Lettuce °Water hyacinth ()Cattail ()Primrose 0 Alligatorweed NATIVE PLANTS NOTED °Cypress 0 Wax Myrtle 0 FL Pine 0 Red Maple 0 Waterlily °Mangrove °Pond Apple 0 Oak 0 Cocoplum 0 Bulrush °Blue flag iris °Strangler fig ()Arrowhead OPickerelweed °Thalia 0 Palms °Golden Canna°Spikerush OButtonbush 0 Eelgrass 0 Cordgrass OFakahatcheegrass0Spatterdock 0 Ferns °Baby tears 0 Naiad OChara 0 Duckweed 0 Bladderwort 0 Pondweed °Slender spikerush°Bacopa Other species noted/comments: www.lakeandwetland.com Rev 07123/14 Farr° 398I) Lake Management-Wetland&Preserve Maintenance La k a & Wet 1 a n d Erosion Restoration-Mosquito&Midge Larvae Control Algae&Aquatic Weed Control -Native Planting `� MANAGEMENT Water Testing&Analysis-Fountains&Aerators SERVICE& INSPECTION REPORT Custorner: %7 `G7J _...,459-y Account#;_..— r _- Date: /9/3/ Technician: //40FC. le t~-/ __ _erritory:_ /."4/''L Weather Conditions: 46#1)040" �vAi,ty 41,-,--0/07v Q LAKE MA AGEMENT [] L.GAE CONTROL Lake(s)#: BASSES&EMERGENTS Lake(s) #:, / 3 9- 2T '7O 1 3o a SUBMERSED AQUATICS Lake(s)#: 4. Y 27 EJ JPLOATING PLANTS Lake(s) #: _ PI INSPECTION Lake(s)# L "I MI L DEBRIS Lake(s)#:Water Test Results(Combined Average) Temperature °F O HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW Dissolved Oxygen ppm D HIGH 0 AVERAGE ❑ LOW pH reading0 ACID 0 NEUTRAL 0 BASE Water Clarity 0 GOOD 0 FAIR 0 POOR Water Level El HIGH El AVERAGE 0 LOW Q LITTORAL SHELF SHELVES#:____.__..__.______-- _. Q SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS ©HERBICIDE TREATMENT D DEBRIS REMOVAL ❑ FLOATING PLANTS 0 MANUAL.REMOVAL ❑ INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION CI UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE PRESERVE(S) #: ❑INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT ❑ DEBRIS REMOVAL ❑GRASSES 0 MANUAL REMOVAL ❑VINES ❑INSPECTION ©MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL LAKE(S)It: —_.__-- ❑INSECTICIDE TREATMENT 0 INSPECTION Comments:___ Ar!-4:r2 .�/�1--✓_,,`zFD.__/•:...,,,,c,. ld/4 c= 15,4.1 //Y.O'f Lt g C/ 4 ZNQ 21r/PP M v. 3- .0- J --:---Noe rio-0" ' FISH&WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS FISH: 0 Bass °Bream 0 Catfish 0 Grass carp 0 Tilapia 0 Mosquitofish 0 Shad BIRDS: 0 Raptor ODuck 0 Wood Stork 0 Shorebird 0 Wading bird Q Songbird 0 Vulture REPTILES: 0 Alligator OSnake 0 Turtle 0 Tortoise 0 Lizard ()AMPHIBIANS O INSECTS INVASIVE/EXOTIC PLANTS NOTED ()Brazilian pepper OMelaleuca OPennywort OBischofia QEarleaf Acacia °Australian pine QShoebutton °Sedge °Climbing Fern °Air potato QTorpedograss QAzolla OSalvinia ODownyrose myrtle Oiavaplum °Floating Hearts °Lantana 0 Hydrilla OHygrophilia OWater Lettuce °Water hyacinth °Cattail ()Primrose 0 Alligatorweed NATIVE PLANTS NOTED °Cypress °Wax Myrtle OFL Pine O Red Maple O Waterlily °Mangrove °Pond Apple °Oak QCocoplum O Bulrush OBlue flag iris °Strangler fig O Arrowhead OPickerelweed ()Thalia O Palnis °Golden Canna°Spikerush QButtonbush OEelgrass OCordgrass OFakahatcheegrass0Spatterdock °Ferns 0 Baby tears 0 Naiad OChara °Duckweed 0 Bladderwort QPondweed 0 Slender spikerush0 Bacopa Other species noted f comments:.____. www.lakeandwetland.com f1ev07/23/14 Form t398D Lake Management-Wetland&Preserve Maintenance *Lake &wetland Erosion Restoration-Mosquito&Midge Larvae Control Algae&Aquatic Weed Control -Native Planting MANAGEMENT Water Testing&Analysis-Fountains&Aerators , SERVICE& INSPECTION REPORT Customer: lie tzlt-�t �:xdL._.._____ _._____. Account#: Date: t\, f i Technician:_IAtAS r) y::W i Territar Weather Conditions: VAKE MANAGEMENT o ALGAE CONTROL Lake(s)#: O GRASSES&EMERGENTS Lake(s)#:-_., .__..._____._....__...._.._.._..........._.__...-.__... ❑ SUBMERSED AQUATICS Lake(s)#: . __-_ ❑ FLOATING PLANTS Lake(s)#:__�_- ___ ___________._ ___ —_ ❑ INSPECTION Lake(s)#:— �— -- —_- — IVIDEBRIS Lake(s)#:_� i__P Water lest Results(Combined Average) Temperature °F 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW Dissolved Oxygen __„_____ _ppm ❑HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW pH reading 0 ACID ❑ NEUTRAL 0 BASE Water Clarity 0 GOOD 0 FAIR 0 POOR Water Level 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE 0 LOW 121/LITTORAL SHELF SHELVES#: ❑ SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS ❑ RBICIDE TREATMENT VI5EBRIS REMOVAL O FLOATING PLANTSANUAL REMOVAL © INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION 4 UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE PRESERVE(S)#: 0 INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES ❑HERBICIDE TREATMENT 0 DEBRIS REMOVAL ❑GRASSES 0 MANUAL REMOVAL 0 VINES 0 INSPECTION 0 MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL LAKE(S)#: O INSECTICIDE TREATMENT 0 INSPECTION Comments: Q Un C onsA e 1x?_manually-_ReMotie_. a 4.___� -011 0 FISH&WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS FISH: 0 Bass °Bream 0 Catfish 0 Grass carp C Tilapia 0 Mosquitofish 0 Shad BIRDS: O Raptor °Duck O Wood Stork Q Shorebird O Wading bird Q Songbird O Vulture REPTILES: O Alligator °Snake 0 Turtle O Tortoise O Lizard Q AMPHIBIANS 0 INSECTS INVASIVE/EXOTIC PLANTS NOTED °Brazilian pepper OMelaleuca OPennywort OBischofia QEarleafAcacia °Australian pine°Shoebutton °Sedge °Climbing Fern °Air potato QTorpedograss QAzolla 05alvinia °Downy rose myrtle°Java plum °Floating Hearts °Lantana OHydrilla OHygrophilia OWater Lettuce °Water hyacinth°Cattail °Primrose QAlligatorweed NATIVE PLANTS NOTED OCypress O Wax Myrtle OFL Pine O Red Maple O Waterlily °Mangrove OPond Apple OOak QCocoplum 0 Bulrush OBlue flag iris 0 Strangler fig 0 Arrowhead OPickerelweed °Thalia ©Palms °Golden Canna()Spikerush OButtonbush 0 Eelgrass 0 Cordgrass OFakahatcheegrassOSpatterdock 0 Ferns 0 Baby tears 0 Naiad OChara °Duckweed O Bladderwort O Pondweed OSlender spikerushO Bacopa Other species noted/comments:_ wwwalakeandwetland.com Bea 01/23/14 Form#398D . Lake Management'Wetmm��Pveoe�ve�mntemanoe Lake Wetland ~ �� �� Ero'ion Restoration-Mosquito&Midge Larvae Control *........1/4„.......411 A>gme&AquaticVVe*d Cwwtvnl -Na@veP|anting MANAGEMENT Water Testing&Analysis'Fountains&Aerators SERVICE & INSPECTION REPORT Customer: �� eAccuunt4: Daze: A Technician; /9/ Territory: // Weather Conditions: Si**,Air _ __________________________________ 0L���K������y���� []perGAE CONTROL Lake(s)#: EMERGENTS Lake(s)#: �m 2_ 1�____- ���UOk4ER5EDAOUAT[S Lake(s)#: _ 0 XDATIPLANTS Lake(s)#/ __------- INSPECTION Lake(s)#: ��t. c-1:30fr[---_-_.__-_-___ L] DEBRIS Luke(s)#: Water Test Results(Combined Average) | Temperature _______"F []HIGH []AVERAGE [] LOW Dissolved Oxygen ppm 0 HIGH [] AVERAGE 0 LOW pH reading 0AQD 0NEVTR�L [] BA�E ------ Water Clarity -_---__ []GOOD 0 FAIR 0 POOR ! Water Level 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE [] LOW O LITTORAL SHELF SHELVES#: [] SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT [] DEBRIS REMOVAL [] FLOATING PLANTS []k4A0UALREy�{}VAL � [] INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION O UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE PRESERVE(S)#:_____ ! []INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT [] DEBRIS REMOVAL []GRASSES 0 MANUAL REMOVAL []VINES []INSPECTION CI MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL I AXF(S)#: [J INSECTICIDE TREATMENT 0 INSPECTION Comments: 4 ��' '''`�_ � '' '' � ,-�'.~-..^~� — /-' ' Tar--- ,, ACV�9-_. '-_-- /Y� ��~ Oe ts _-_ FISH&WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS FISH: 0 Bass ()Bream 0 Catfish 0 Grass carp 0 Tilapia 0 MosquitotishDShad BIRDS: 0 Raptor ODuck 0 Wood Stork 0 Shorebird 0 Wading bird CJSongbird 0 Vulture REPTILES: 0AUigauor OSnake 0Tv,Uc C)Tnrmie {JLizard [)AMPHIBIANS 0 INSECT INVASIVE!EXOTIC PLANTS NOTED °BmzNaopepper C}/Np|a/evca OPennywort OBischofia (]EadeafAcacia °Avstm|ianpine 05hncbumnn 0 Sedge [>UimbinAFern []Ai/potato OTorpedograss0Azo||a 0 Sa|v|nia °omwnyrose myrtle C)Javaplum °F|omingH°a,t, °Lantana {}*ydriUo OHygrophilia [}Wate,Lettuce {]Watwrhyacinth[}[atmU {Jp,in`w`e 0xU/gato,weeu NATIVE PLANTS NOTED O[ypv:,^ 0Wax Myrtle OpLpinr 0Red Maple 0wmte,Uly °w1angmve °pondApp|e °Oak {}[ncop}um {JBu|rush B|uoflag iris C}S*ong|e,fig arrowhead 0 pickroe|weed Thalia {}Palms (}6o|den[a"n»[J5p|ke,ush C}Huttnnbush 0 Eelgrass 0 CordFamhotche mssSpauevdock 0 Ferns 0 Baby tears 0 Naiad OChara 0 Duckweed 0 Bladderwort OPondweed 0Slender m|komsh{]8acopa Other species noted/comments: ___ _________ www.lakeandwetiand.com Rev 07/23/14 rani`,*m Lake Management-Wetland&Preserve Maintenance Lake &Wet 1 a n d Erosion Restoration-Mosquito&Midge Larvae Control �-- Algae&Aquatic Weed Control -Native Planting �" MANAGEMENT Water Testing&Analysis-Fountains&Aerators SERVICE & INSPECTION REPORT Customer: gt __- Account#: Date: » 110/ ig Technician:__ff _ —._. Territory: _ Q, .(D _______ Weather Conditions: __— _--.. —_ LAKE MANAGEMENT ❑ ALGAE CONTROL Lake(s)#: ___----___-_-- ❑ GRASSES&EMERGENTS Lake(s)#: ❑ SUBMERSED AQUATICS Lake(s)#:____.______._ O FLOATING PLANTS Lake(s)#: p p1SPECTION Lake(s)#: DEBRIS Lake(s)#:.,___ _ ._ ____r._ ____.__ ___..__.._.._ Water Test Results(Combined Average) Temperature __,._ _�_°F 0 HIGH 0 AVERAGE ❑ LOW Dissolved Oxygen _______-,___-_ppm ©HIGH 0 AVERAGE ❑ LOW pH reading ___,__- 0 ACID 0 NEUTRAL Cl BASE Water Clarity _ 0 GOOD p FAIR 0 POOR Water Level 0 HIGH p AVERAGE ❑ LOW 0 LITTORAL SHELF SHELVES#: _ ❑ SHORELINE GRASSES&EMERGENTS Li HERBICIDETREATMENT {get5EBRIS REMOVAL O FLOATING PLANTS RIVIANUAL REMOVAL o INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 INSPECTION 0 UPLAND/WETLAND PRESERVE PRESERVE(S)#: _ ©INVASIVE/EXOTIC SPECIES 0 HERBICIDE TREATMENT ❑ DEBRIS REMOVAL ❑GRASSES ❑MANUAL REMOVAL 0 VINES 0 INSPECTION 0 MOSQUITO/MIDGE LARVAE CONTROL LAKE(S)#: [_]INSECTICIDE TREATMENT 0 INSPECTION Comments: ___(-tcound =AI_ entic Iv tylawat9 /2kiiviic alLerassLsiL, 4Nanciaiim jam 304 FISH&WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS FISH: 0 Bass °Bream 0 Catfish 0 Grass carp 0 Tilapia 0 Mosquitofish 0 Shad BIRDS; 0 Raptor °Duck 0 Wood Stork 0 Shorebird 0 Wading bird 0 Songbird 0 Vulture REPTILES; 0 Alligator °Snake 0 Turtle 0 Tortoise 0 Lizard 0 AMPHIBIANS 0 INSECTS INVASIVE!EXOTIC PLANTS NOTED °Brazilian pepper 0 Melaleuca OPennywort OBischofia OEarleaf Acacia °Australian pine OShoebutton °Sedge °Climbing Fern °Air potato OTorpedograss OAzolla OSalvinia °Downy rose myrtle°Java plum ()Floating Hearts °Lantana OHydrilla OHygrophilia °Water Lettuce OWater hyacinth°Cattail °Primrose QAlligatorweed NATIVE PLANTS NOTED OCypress O Wax Myrtle OFL Pine °Red Maple O Waterlily °Mangrove OPond Apple °Oak OCocoplum O Bulrush °Blue flag iris °Strangler fig O Arrowhead OPickerelweed OThalia O Palms °Golden Canna°Spikerush OButtonbush 0 Eelgrass 0 Cordgrass OFakahatcheegrass OSpatterdock 0 Ferns 0 Baby tears 0 Naiad OChara °Duckweed 0 Bladderwort OPondweed 0Slender spikerushOBacopa Other species noted/comments:-_________-_____.___,^ _ www.lakeandwetland.com Rev 07/13114 Form b 3980