Loading...
CCPC Agenda 01/31/2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 1/23/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Career Source 750 South 5th Street Immokalee, FL 34142 January 31, 2019 10: 00 AM Mark Strain - Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice-Chair Edwin Fryer - Secretary Patrick Dearborn Karl Fry Stan Chrzanowski, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. January 2019 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 1/23/2019 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised 1. PL20180002258/CPSP-2018-5: A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, relating to the Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy and specifically amending the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element and the Immokalee Future Land Use Map; and furthermore recommending transmittal of the amendments to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity [Coordinator: Anita Jenkins, AICP, Principal Planner] B. Noticed 10. New Business 11. Old Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn 01/31/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.1 Item Summary: PL20180002258/CPSP-2018-5: A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89- 05, as amended, relating to the Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy and specifically amending the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element and the Immokalee Future Land Use Map; and furthermore recommending transmittal of the amendments to the Florida Department of Economic Op portunity [Coordinator: Anita Jenkins, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 01/31/2019 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Senior – Zoning Name: Marcia R Kendall 01/14/2019 3:09 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 01/14/2019 3:09 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department David Weeks Additional Reviewer Completed 01/14/2019 4:03 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 01/16/2019 10:19 AM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 01/16/2019 10:57 AM Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 01/19/2019 4:06 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Review Item Completed 01/23/2019 9:38 AM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 01/31/2019 10:00 AM 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 3 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN AMENDMENTS (TRANSMITTAL HEARING) PROJECT: PL20180002258/CPSP-2018-6 CCPC: January 31, 2019 BCC: March 12, 2019 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: CCPC COVER (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) CCPC – IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSMITTAL AMENDMENTS SPECIAL CCPC MTG: JANUARY 31, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) TAB: Transmittal Staff Report DOCUMENT: CCPC Staff Report: PL20180002258/CPSP-2018-5 w/attachment A” Strike-through – Underline changes to proposed 2012 IAMP 2) TAB: Map DOCUMENT: Map 1 IAMP FLUM Existing vs Proposed 3) TAB: Attachment “B” DOCUMENT: White Paper 4) TAB: Resolution DOCUMENT: Transmittal Resolution with Exhibit “A” text (and/or maps): PL20180002258/CPSP-2018-5 5) TAB: Legal Advertisements DOCUMENT: CCPC Advertisements/Immokalee Bulletin & Naples Daily News 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: TOC_CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) Agenda Item 9.A.1 ‒ 1 ‒ CPSP-2018-5 / PL20180002258 Staff Proposed Immokalee Area Master Plan Amendments STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMMUNITY PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: January 31, 2019 RE: PETITION PL20180002258/CPSP-2018-5, STAFF-PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] INTRODUCTION The proposed Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendments found in Attachment A to this report (and Resolution, Exhibit A) are derived from years of public input and Plan refinements. These are presented to the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), in its capacity as the County’s Land Planning Agency under Florida Statutes and as the County’s Environmental Advisory Council (EAC), for consideration at Transmittal stage public hearings. Staff requests the CCPC and EAC forward these amendments to the Board of County Commissioners (Board) with a recommendation to transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). BACKGROUND On February 10, 2015, the Board directed staff to initiate GMP “restudies” of four GMP master plans in eastern Collier County: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA), and Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). The IAMP restudy formally began in January 2018. As with all restudies, through a public outreach effort, staff focused on complementary land uses, economic vitality, mobility, and environmental sustainability. The Board appointed an ad hoc advisory committee, the Growth Management Oversight Committee (GMOC), which first convened in December 2015. The GMOC has directed the public engagement process of the restudies since inception. The GMOC reviews the restudy recommendations from a high level, non-granular perspective, emphasizing consistency among the restudies, sustainability and economic vitality. Unlike prior area restudies, however, the Board directed that staff, rather than appointed committees, provide recommendations to the Board covering each of the four areas. The White Paper, Attachment B, provides the summary of findings underlying the revisions to Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Land Use Designation Descriptions within the IAMP. The White Paper was presented to the Board on June 26, 2018. At that time, the Board directed staff to initiate the GMP Amendment process for the proposed changes to the IAMP. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report IAMP_FNL_CA (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) Agenda Item 9.A.1 ‒ 2 ‒ CPSP-2018-5 / PL20180002258 Staff Proposed Immokalee Area Master Plan Amendments The Immokalee Urban area, surrounded by the rural agricultural area designated as the Rural Lands Stewardship Area, is a region of about 30 square miles containing ±17,116 acres of land; it is located in northeast Collier County, approximately 30 miles from the coastal urban area. More than half of the land use type within the Immokalee Urban area is presently agricultural. The remainder is a mixture of residential, commercial and industrial uses. Immokalee is accessed from the south and east by its major roadway, Immokalee Road (CR 846). State Road 29 provides access into the community from the northern counties of Lee and Hendry and to the southeast areas of Collier County (see below aerial map depicting the Immokalee Urban boundary). A Brief History: The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopted the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) in 1991. The Master Plan, with the accompanying Immokalee Area Future Land Use Map, provides a framework for development of the Immokalee Community. The Board of County Commissioners adopted a revised IAMP in 1997, based upon the 1996 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (a State-mandated thorough review of the entire GMP). During 2003, the BCC authorized Comprehensive Planning staff to prepare recommendations for revising the 1997 IAMP. Subsequently, the Board authorized creation of an advisory committee, the Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Committee (Restudy Committee), to work with staff in making proposed revisions to the IAMP. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report IAMP_FNL_CA (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) Agenda Item 9.A.1 ‒ 3 ‒ CPSP-2018-5 / PL20180002258 Staff Proposed Immokalee Area Master Plan Amendments The Restudy Committee, assisted by Comprehensive Planning staff, submitted recommendations to amend the IAMP in November 2003. However, during the performance of its tasks, the Committee determined that a longer, more intense restudy of the IAMP was necessary. Therefore, the IAMP Restudy Committee expressed a desire to extend the life of the Committee so that it could continue to assist the Board with the implementation the IAMP. The re-established Committee was renamed as the Immokalee Area Master Plan and Visioning Committee (IMPVC). The Committee worked for over a four-year period conducting public meetings, collecting and analyzing data, and drafting revisions to the IAMP. Hearings on the proposed amendments commenced in January 2010 with transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (predecessor to DEO) occurring in September 2010. Adoption hearings followed, beginning in January 2011. Through the adoption phase, the BCC directed the Collier County Supervisor of Elections to place a straw ballot referendum on the August 2012 ballot for the purpose of measuring the Immokalee community support for the proposed amendments. The referendum resulted in the majority of voters (67%) in favor of the amendments. At the BCC's final adoption hearing on the proposed amendments, one Commissioner abstained, and the final vote was 3-1 for approval (adoption). Because a minimum of four affirmative votes was required, the proposed IAMP amendments failed to be adopted. Through the current IAMP restudy process, staff and the Immokalee community honored the extensive work that had taken place in the previous amendment effort. The final IAMP document presented to the BCC was used as a starting point for further consideration. The community’s work and additional refinement of their plan is reflected in Attachment A (and Resolution Exhibit A). Immokalee’s Vision: Through the County’s public outreach during the Immokalee Area Master Plan restudy process, it is clear that the residents of Immokalee see new possibilities for their community with the development of this Master Plan. With this new Master Plan, Immokalee has chosen to focus on opportunities rather than challenges. Immokalee is committed to redefining its future, revitalizing its community, and developing a new mission that focuses on strengthening and diversifying its economy, embracing cultural diversity, and welcoming visitors to “this place we call home.” During the 2018 public workshop process, residents and business owners established a guiding community vision. It is the intent to implement this vision through the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of this Master Plan. The community defined their vision as: “Immokalee is a family-oriented community that supports a healthy lifestyle. It is attractive, environmentally sustainable and offers a full range of housing, recreation and education opportunities to meet all residents’ needs. Immokalee has a safe, well-connected network to walk and bicycle about town, as well as a roadway network needed to support the transport of goods and services. Business and job opportunities flourish in trade and distribution, agri- business, and ecotourism.” Major Changes: In general, the amendments to the IAMP propose seven new goals, each with respective objectives and policies; followed by the revised Land Use Designation Description Section. The revised goals simplify but maintain the original intent of the existing adopted goals. During each public workshop, staff reviewed with the public the adopted and proposed goals to measure the continued support for the proposed goals. There was overwhelming consensus and a preference to move forward with the proposed goals. The Immokalee Area Master Plan has been developed to emphasize identified opportunities and strengths. The first goal specifically makes economic development a priority, and the 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report IAMP_FNL_CA (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) Agenda Item 9.A.1 ‒ 4 ‒ CPSP-2018-5 / PL20180002258 Staff Proposed Immokalee Area Master Plan Amendments objectives and policies set forth specific ways to promote the local economy and create a positive business climate. The second goal focuses on quality neighborhoods for Immokalee. The objectives and policies set forth a process for the community to evaluate the needs and opportunities of each neighborhood. Future neighborhood improvements such as housing conditions, water management, transportation, lighting , and play areas, are possibilities to elevate the quality of life for Immokalee residents. The third goal addresses infrastructure and public services. Partnering with the Immokalee CRA, a list of capital improvement projects will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners at their annual CRA workshop. The fourth goal addresses the significant natural resources within the Immokalee Urban Area and the desire to support and promote ecotourism opportunities. Land use is an integral component of any master plan. The fifth goal defines the land use designations applicable to Immokalee, as illustrated on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map. Mixed-use, pedestrian- scaled development is important, as is allowing development in appropriate locations, at densities and intensities that will attract new development. Urban form and design are addressed in the sixth goal. The objectives and policies are generally concerned with how to create a theme or brand for Immokalee, provide safe multi-modal transportation, and develop site design and development standards appropriate for Immokalee, rather than continuing to apply standards developed for coastal Collier. The seventh and last goal is concerned with interlocal and intergovernmental coordination, to address current service issues and to continue collaboration with appropriate organizations in the future. Consistent with the Board’s direction to evaluate and consider land use, economic vitality, transportation, and natural resources, the following are some of the major changes proposed: Land Use and Economic Vitality • The re-designation of the lands within the boundary of the Immokalee Regional Airport from Industrial (ID) to Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict (APO). • A re-designation of approximately 684 acres of residential lands proposed to support commercial or industrial development: o ±122 acres to allow commercial development. Intensity of development is proposed to remain as allowed in the existing IAMP: C-1 through C-4 uses, o ±362 acres to allow industrial mixed-use development, and o ±200 acres to allow Recreational Tourist development. • No changes in base density except for an increase in the Commercial Mixed-Use District (12 to 16 units per acre), and affordable housing bonus previously approved by the BCC (bonus increased from 8 to 12 units per acre maximum). • Allow new uses on properties zoned (A) Rural Agricultural, within the Low Residential Subdistrict, including agriculture research and development facilities, agribusiness offices and headquarters, and facilities, offices, headquarters and apparatuses associated with alternative energy uses. These new uses will be subject to Land Development Code Amendments to define compatibility criteria and development standards. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report IAMP_FNL_CA (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) Agenda Item 9.A.1 ‒ 5 ‒ CPSP-2018-5 / PL20180002258 Staff Proposed Immokalee Area Master Plan Amendments Table 1 below illustrates the proposed changes to FLUM designations. Table 1: FLUM designation changes. Existing FLUM Designations Proposed FLUM Designations URBAN-MIXED USE DISTRICT URBAN-MIXED USE DISTRICT LR Low Residential LR Low Residential MR Mixed Residential MR Medium Residential HR High Residential HR High Residential NC Neighborhood Center Eliminated CC-MU Commerce Center-Mixed-Use Eliminated PUD Planned Unit Development Commercial Eliminated RT Recreational Tourist RT Recreational/Tourist CMU Commercial-Mixed Use (new) URBAN-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Eliminated C Commercial – SR 29 and Jefferson Ave. Eliminated URBAN - INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT URBAN - INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ID Industrial IN Industrial CC-I Commerce Center - Industrial I-MU Industrial-Mixed Use (new) BP Business Park Eliminated APO Immokalee Regional Airport (new) The changes in land use designations are reflected on the attached Map 1, IAMP FLUM – Existing vs Proposed. In addition to these substantive land use changes, two specific opportunities were identified as important to the community to explore: 1) an Immokalee civic center, and 2) a satellite Emergency Operations Center to activate in the event of an emergency. Transportation • Collier County will initiate a transportation planning study with recommendations to identify potential routes to improve connectivity of the collector and local street grid, to expand public transit service, and bicycle and pedestrian access. In addition to the IAMP supporting the MPO’s Long Range Transportation improvements for Immokalee, the IAMP also recognizes the need for local street improvements, and incentives to bring private roads up to County standards. Natural Resources • Re-configuration of the boundary of the Wetlands Connected To Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay (see attached Map 1). The boundary of the Wetlands Connected To Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay (LT/CKSSO) was adopted as part of the 2007 GMP amendments. As part of this change, policies were added to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) to increase the native vegetation retention requirements. Subsequent analysis by staff yielded a different, more accurate boundary of this wetland. The revised boundary is part of this amendment petition. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report IAMP_FNL_CA (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) Agenda Item 9.A.1 ‒ 6 ‒ CPSP-2018-5 / PL20180002258 Staff Proposed Immokalee Area Master Plan Amendments GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (GMOC) RECOMMENDATION At its meeting on September 6, 2018, the GMOC found the IAMP recommendations consistent with public participation direction, supportive of sustainability and economic vitality and, so far as known, consistent with other restudy planning efforts. IMMOKALEE CRA ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION At its meeting on November 28, 2018, the Immokalee CRA Advisory Board agreed unanimously to recommend approval to transmit the proposed amendments, with two suggested changes as underlined below: 1) Policy 2.1.1 – Within two (2) years…to identify opportunities, including but not limited to, to improve neighborhood recreation… 2) Policy 3.3.4 – Recognizing that a significant segment…improve connectivity of collector and local street grid to public transit service, evacuation, and bicycle and pedestrian access. Staff agrees with the intent of the language additions; however, after discussing Policy 3.3.4 with Emergency Management staff, it was determined that the word “evacuation” has potential legal implications associated with hurricane evacuation that were not specifically intended. CRA Advisory Board members’ discussion of the policy was more focused on the need for alternative routes in case of a car crash, fire, or other emergency in an area with limited access. Staff recommends replacing the word “evacuation” with “public safety.” LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: “plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue.” 163.3177(1)(f), FS The County Attorney’s office reviewed the staff report on . [SAS] STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Collier County Planning Commission, acting as the Land Planning Agency and the Environmental Advisory Council, forward the proposed IAMP amendments to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, subject to revising Policy 3.3.4 to replace the word “evacuation” with “public safety.” [see above comment] Attachments: • Attachment A: Substantive text changes to the previously proposed (2011) amendments • Map 1: IAMP FLUM – Existing vs. Proposed • Attachment B: IAMP Restudy White Paper • Resolution with Exhibit A: Text and map changes 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report IAMP_FNL_CA (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) Agenda Item 9.A.1 ‒ 7 ‒ CPSP-2018-5 / PL20180002258 Staff Proposed Immokalee Area Master Plan Amendments 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: CCPC Staff Report IAMP_FNL_CA (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 1 2 3 PROPOSED IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN CCPC Draft December 2018 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 1 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted I. INTRODUCTION 1 Immokalee has long been recognized as a distinct community within Collier County. 2 Immokalee’s economy, geography, and demographic make-up are different than the rest of 3 Collier County. Approximately one-half of the land within the Immokalee Urban Area is presently 4 zoned and actively used for agriculture. The urban area is surrounded by productive crop lands 5 and environmentally significant habitat. Most Immokalee residents work within the agricultural 6 industry, and the majority of agricultural laborers originate from Mexico and Central America. 7 Statistics from the 2010 Census (the most comprehensive data for Immokalee currently 8 available), comparing Immokalee to the County as a whole, reflect some of the key socio- 9 economic differences, including age distribution, race and ethnicity, income, education and 10 housing. 11 The Immokalee Area Planning Commission was formed in 1965, and Immokalee was governed 12 under separate Zoning and Subdivision Regulations until 1982. While it is now included under 13 the county-wide Land Development Code, in 1991 the County again acknowledged the need for 14 Immokalee-specific land use regulation with the adoption of the first Immokalee Area Master 15 Plan as an element in the County’s overall comprehensive plan. 16 Collier County first established the Immokalee Area as a Planning Community in its 1983 17 Comprehensive Plan. In 1989, the County adopted revisions to the comprehensive plan, now 18 called the Growth Management Plan (GMP), which included a requirement to develop an area 19 master plan for Immokalee. In 1991, the County adopted the first Immokalee Area Master Plan 20 (IAMP), as referenced in Policy 4.32 of the Future Land Use Element: 21 22 A detailed Master Plan for the Immokalee Urban designated area has been developed and was 23 incorporated into this Growth Management Plan in February 1991. Major revisions were 24 adopted in 1997 following the 1996 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The Immokalee Area 25 Master Plan addresses conservation, future land use, population, recreation, transportation, 26 housing, and the local economy. Major purposes of the Master Plan are coordination of land 27 uses and transportation planning, redevelopment or renewal of blighted areas, and the 28 promotion of economic development. 29 30 The IAMP is in addition to and supplements the goals, objectives, and policies, of the Collier 31 County Growth Management Plan. Due to the unique geographic, social, and economic 32 characteristics of the Immokalee Urban Designated Area as compared with urban Naples, 33 Coastal Collier County, and the State of Florida as a whole, the Board of County 34 Commissioners deemed it necessary to restudy the Immokalee Urban Designated Area. On 35 May 27, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution 2003-192, which 36 established the Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Committee as an ad hoc advisory 37 committee to the board. The Committee was to serve for a period of one year. On September 38 28, 2004, the Board adopted Ordinance 2004-62, extending the timeframe for the advisory 39 committee and renaming it the Immokalee Master Plan and Visioning Committee (IMPVC). On 40 November 13, 2007, the Board adopted Ordinance 2007-69, which extended the timeframe 41 again, providing for dissolution of the committee no later than December 31, 2009. The purpose 42 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 2 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted and duties of the Committee remain the same: 1 2 A. Assist in the development of any necessary Requests for Proposals (RFPs) for consulting 3 services. 4 B. Assist County staff with the review of general planning matters related to the Immokalee 5 Community. These could include housing, zoning, economic and/or other issues as may be 6 brought before the Committee. 7 C. Identify and provide the Board of County Commissioners the Committee recommendations 8 relative to: 9 1. road improvements; 10 2. economic incentives; 11 3. increasing the quality and quantity of affordable housing; 12 4. land uses and improvements relative to the Immokalee Regional Airport; 13 5. density increases in mixed-use districts; 14 6. restructuring of future land use designations and designation boundaries within the 15 Immokalee community; 16 7. the facilitation of construction of commercial development in commercial districts; 17 8. the preparation of revisions to current zoning districts and the development of associated 18 LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as amended) standards; and 19 9. the review of the 5-year Schedule of Capital Improvements relative to the Immokalee 20 community. 21 D. Assist in the development of revised goals, objectives, and policies, and land use 22 designation descriptions for the Immokalee Area Master Plan. 23 E. Assist in the review and updating of the Immokalee Area Master Plan in order to establish 24 consistency between the Master Plan and the County Rural Lands Stewardship Area 25 Overlay provisions. 26 27 The IMPVC worked steadily towards achieving these goals. However, by 2012 tThe adoption of 28 the revised IAMP and revised Immokalee Master Plan Future Land Use Map remained out of 29 reach and no amendments were made to the IAMP. represents the first step in completing the 30 objectives of the Committee. The Collier County LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as amended) will be 31 updated next to implement the Goal, Objectives, and Policies of the IAMP, followed closely by 32 an update to the Capital Improvements Plan, and the creation of a long-term transportation plan. 33 34 In 2015, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to update four area master plans 35 including the Immokalee Area Master Plan. Staff then engaged the Immokalee community in a 36 review of the significant work accomplished during the previous restudy. The amendments to 37 the IAMP found herein are a result of the Immokalee residents and business owners continued 38 focus and effort to improve the land use policies that will regulate growth in their community. 39 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 3 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted An integral component of Immokalee’s future is the Collier County Community Redevelopment 1 Agency (CRA). Established in 2000 by the Board of County Commissioners, the Agency’s 2 mission is to eliminate blighted conditions as identified under Chapter 163, Part 3 of the F lorida 3 Statutes. The Board of County Commissioners is the ex-officio board of the CRA. In 2000, the 4 BCC adopted the Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan that included two 5 redevelopment areas: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle and Immokalee. 6 7 In 2000, the Immokalee CRA Local Redevelopment Advisory Board was created and members 8 from the community were appointed to provide recommendations to the CRA to implement the 9 redevelopment plan and the allocation of tax increment revenues generated by increased 10 property values. Over the years, the Immokalee CRA Local Advisory Board has served as a 11 vehicle to bring forward community needs and interests. 12 13 For the purposes of this Plan, the Immokalee CRA is defined to reference the Immokalee 14 component of the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency. 15 16 17 II. NEW DIRECTIONS 18 Through the County’s public outreach during the Immoalee Area Master Plan restudy process, it 19 is clear that Tthe residents of Immokalee see new possibilities for their community with the 20 development of this Master Plan. With the development of this new Master Plan, Immokalee has 21 chosen to focus on opportunities rather than challenges. Immokalee is committed to redefining 22 its future, revitalizing its community, and developing a new mission that focuses on 23 strengthening and diversifying its economy, embracing cultural diversity, and welcoming visitors 24 to “this place we call home.” 25 During the 2018 public workshop process, residents and business owners established a guiding 26 community vision. It is the intent to implement this vision through the Goals, Objectives and 27 Policies of this Master Plan. The community defined their vision as: 28 “Immokalee is a family-oriented community that supports a healthy lifestyle. It is 29 attractive, environmentally sustainable and offers a full range of housing, recreation and 30 education opportunities to meet all residents’ needs. Immokalee has a safe, well-31 connected network to walk and bicycle about town, as well as a roadway network 32 needed to support the transport of goods and services. Business and job opportunities 33 flourish in trade and distribution, agri-business, and ecotourism.” 34 Economic opportunity lies in Immokalee’s diverse community. Many residents have roots in 35 Mexico, Central America, Haiti, and various other Caribbean nations. This multicultural heritage 36 should be embraced and used to develop a local marketing strategy. This diversity should guide 37 the redevelopment and design of downtown in order to create a distinct area that will attract new 38 business and visitors. Revitalization of the Main Street commercial corridor will be designed to 39 embrace this cultural diversity; take advantage of the traffic generated by the Immokalee 40 Seminole Casino Hotel and the growing Stewardship Receiving Areas, including the Town of 41 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 4 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted Ave Maria; and create new public plazas and gathering spaces. These public plazas and 1 spaces will be designed within an appropriate streetscape to foster walkability and a mixture of 2 uses, including entertainment and cultural events, and will position Immokalee to attract new 3 residents and visitors to the downtown area. 4 The diversity of Immokalee extends to its unique natural surroundings, which can also be a 5 great benefit to the local economy. Lake Trafford, at Immokalee’s western boundary, as well as 6 other adjacent vast natural areas, which include historic working ranches, provide an excellent 7 opportunity to market Immokalee as an ecotourist destination. Immokalee provides a gateway to 8 the Everglades, a world-renowned ecotourist destination. Ecotourists come to an area to 9 experience the natural, rather than the built, environment. Lake Trafford and its environs offer 10 opportunities for boating, fishing, camping, and hiking, and the chance to experience natural 11 Florida and this freshwater frontier. 12 Agriculture continues to be the major local industry and Immokalee residents recognize 13 emerging opportunities for new agricultural-related businesses. Increasing fuel costs, 14 apprehension related to food security, and environmental concerns have increased the demand 15 for safe, sustainable, and domestically produced foods and energy sources. Immokalee has an 16 opportunity to create a new farmers’ market or expand the existing state farmers’ market to 17 serve the regional demand for fresh produce. 18 Additionally, residents see opportunities emerging from the regional economy and the strategic 19 location of Immokalee in the region. Immokalee will not remain isolated in the future. One state 20 arterial (SR 29) runs through the downtown, while another ends just three miles north of 21 downtown (SR 82). A major county road (CR 846, Immokalee Road), connects Immokalee to I -22 75. Planned capacity improvements to SR 82 and SR 29 will open up the area to more travel, 23 and planned roadway expansions, including a SR 29 Loop, will further improve the accessibility 24 to and from Immokalee, helping it to become a tourist destination and a distribution center for 25 goods and services. 26 Improvements to the roadway system, both regionally and within the Immokalee Urban Area, 27 are just one part of how the overall transportation network will improve in impact the future. The 28 Immokalee Regional Airport (IMM) is designated as an official U.S. Port of Entry, with its own 29 full-service Customs Office, supporting both international and domestic trade opportunities, and 30 is a growing cargo service airport. Incentives to encourage economic development at the IMM 31 include Tthe Florida Tradeport which operates within a Foreign Trade Zone (#213), State 32 Enterprise Zone, Federal Enterprise Community, and the Historically Underutilized Business 33 (HUBub) Zone. ItIMM provides direct access to over 2,000 acres of industrial-zoned property 34 and two paved 5,000 x 150- foot runways equipped for Global Position Satellite (GPS) and 35 instrument approaches. 36 The opportunities available through development of the Tradeport are particularly significant 37 given that in 2012 the Collier County Office of Business and Economic Development (OBED) 38 Economic Development Council of Collier County (EDC) estimateds the County will need an 39 additional 3,685 acres of new business park lands by 2030. The OBEDEDC has been working 40 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 5 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted to attract research clusters to Collier County to diversify the economy, which is currently highly 1 dependent on only three industries: agriculture, construction, and tourism and services. The 2 three targeted industry clusters are: health and life science; computer software and services; 3 and distribution. Given its location, access to major roads, connectivity wit h other parts of the 4 state, availability of developable land, and the airport, Immokalee is a prime location for the new 5 distribution industry that the OBEDEDC has identified as being vital to the growth and 6 diversification of Collier County’s economy. 7 Another potential for economic growth lies in anticipated development in areas surrounding 8 Immokalee. As new towns in eastern Collier County develop, needed government services and 9 departments could be centrally located in Immokalee to serve the eastern portion of the 10 County. 11 12 III. IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN PRIORITIES 13 The Immokalee Area Master Plan has been developed to emphasize these identified 14 opportunities and strengths. The first goal requires the development of an Immokalee specific 15 prioritized list of capital improvements and other activities desired to be funded each year. 16 Overall, each of the eight goals support economic development and diversity, but Goal Two, 17 specifically makes economic development a priority, and the objectives and policies set forth 18 specific ways to promote and diversify the local economy and create a positive business 19 climate. 20 The second third goal, and its objective and policies, deal with focuses on quality 21 neighborhoods. An Immokalee Neighborhood Map has been created by the community to begin 22 the process of evaluating the needs of each neighborhood. Future neighborhood improvements 23 such as housing conditions, water management, transportation, lighting and play areas, are 24 encourage to elevate the quality of life for Immokalee residents. housing. Mobile homes have 25 historically provided a significant percentage of the housing in Immokalee, and have provided 26 affordable homes. Adequate housing for farmworkers must continue to be addressed. Gap 27 housing and other “market-rate” housing, which provides housing for middle-class families, has 28 been historically underrepresented in the Immokalee market. Affordable-workforce housing will 29 continue to be needed in the community. Note that the terms Gap and Affordable Workforce 30 Housing are defined in the Collier County LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as amended). 31 The fourth third goal and set of objectives addresses infrastructure and public services. Parks 32 and recreational opportunities to serve the young families in Immokalee are the first public 33 infrastructure item discussed. Transportation is a major component of any community’s public 34 infrastructure needs, and while county-wide issues are still dealt with in the county 35 Transportation Element, this portion addresses Immokalee’s local roads and needed public 36 safety improvements to protect pedestrians and bicyclists. Other important public services 37 include stormwater management and solid waste, which are addressed as well. 38 The fifth fourth goal addresses and related objective deals with natural resource protection and 39 how to promote eco-tourism within Immokalee. While the Conservation and Coastal 40 Management Element still applies, significant natural resources within the Immokalee Urban 41 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 6 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted Area and ecotourism opportunities are addressed here. 1 Land use is an integral component of any master plan., and the sixth The fifth goal and its 2 objective and policies deal with this issue. Defines the land use designations applicable to 3 Immokalee, and as illustrated on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map. Mixed-use, pedestrian-4 scaled development is important, as is allowing development in appropriate locations, at 5 densities and intensities that will attract new development. 6 Urban form and design are addressed in the seventh sixth goal. These objectives and policies 7 are generally concerned with how to create a theme or brand for Immokalee, pr ovide safe multi- 8 modal transportation, and develop site design and development standards appropriate for 9 Immokalee, rather than continuing to apply standards developed for coastal Collier. 10 The eighth seventh and last goal, is objective, and related policies are concerned with interlocal 11 and intergovernmental coordination, to address current service issues and to continue 12 collaboration with appropriate organizations in the future. 13 14 IV. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 15 This section places the plan into effect. Implementation strategies include the Goals, 16 Objectives and Policies, and the Land Use Designation Description section. 17 18 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 19 20 GOAL 12: ENHANCE AND DIVERSIFY IMMOKALEE’S LOCAL ECONOMY. 21 22 OBJECTIVE 21.1: 23 Actively pursue, attract, and retain business enterprises. 24 25 Policy 21.1.1: Commercial and Trade Hub 26 In recognition of Immokalee’s strategic location within Collier County and sSouthwest Florida, 27 and the Foreign Trade Zone, Community Redevelopment Area, Promise Zone, Federal 28 Enterprise Community, Historically Underdeveloped Building (HUB) Zone, and Rural Area of 29 Opportunity (RAO) designations, the County will continue to support and partner with other 30 organizations to seek and maintain and the economic or funding opportunities and resulting 31 from those designations that will: 32 33 • Support the Immokalee CRA and other economic development entities in actively 34 promoting and positioning Immokalee as a regional commercial and trade hub for 35 businesses seeking to locate or expand into Southwest Florida; and 36 • Encourage the Immokalee CRA and other economic development entities in the 37 marketing of commercial and industrial opportunities in Immokalee.; 38 • Support the CRA in pursuing grants and funding from government, non-39 governmental organizations, or private sector partnerships. 40 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 7 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted Policy 21.1.2: Florida Tradeport/Immokalee Regional Airport/Florida Tradeport 1 Collier County will encourage the promotion of economic development opportunities at the 2 Immokalee Regional Airport/Florida Tradeport and the surrounding commercial and industrial 3 areas. 4 5 Policy 21.1.3: Mitigation Banking and/or Targeted Acquisition Lands 6 Within two (2) years of adoption, the effective date of this policy, Collier County will explore the 7 feasibility of utilizing privately owned undeveloped parcels with significant wetland, upland, or 8 listed species habitat value, as a listed species habitat conservation bank or wetland mitigation 9 bank to: 1) compensate for wetland or listed species impacts associated with development 10 within the Immokalee Urban Area, 2) for mitigation required by state and federal agencies, or 11 3) for off-site preservation when allowed. The purpose of such a mitigation bank and/or 12 identification of lands targeted for acquisition within the Immokalee Urban Area, in addition to 13 the ecological benefits, is to facilitate and expedite permitting of development and 14 redevelopment on other more appropriate lands within the Immokalee Urban Area. During this 15 period, the County shall develop a map depicting the preferred lands to be targeted for 16 mitigation or acquisition by public or private parties. Incentives and regulatory requirements 17 shall be included in the LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as amended) to direct mitigation to, or 18 acquisition of, these targeted lands and to direct development away from such lands. 19 20 OBJECTIVE 21.2: 21 Create a business climate that will enhance and diversify the Immokalee area’s economy and 22 increase employment opportunities. 23 24 Policy 2.2.1: Expedited Review 25 Within two (2) years of the effective date of this policy subject to Policy 1.1.1, Collier County will 26 review and amend or expand, as necessary, the fast track and expedited review program for 27 projects that provide a positive economic benefit to the Immokalee economy, specifically 28 including affordable, gap, and farmworker housing and targeted industries. During this period, 29 criteria will be developed to be used as a guide for determining what will qualify a project for this 30 expedited review program. (this has been accomplished through Resolution 2016-247) 31 32 Policy 21.2.12: Pre-Certified Commercial/Industrial Sites 33 Collier County will encourage the development of targeted manufacturing, light industrial, and 34 other similar uses by identifying appropriate locations for those uses, and by streamlining the 35 permitting and approval process for commercial and industrial development within the 36 Immokalee Urban Area. Within one (1) year of adoption, Collier County will initiate the review of 37 the existing Certified Sites Program, presently administered by the Collier County Office of 38 Business and Economic Development, and propose improvements to the program that will 39 further assist economic development in the Immokalee area. 40 41 Policy 21.2.23: Home Occupations 42 Within two (2) years of adoption, Collier County will initiate amendments to the LDC (Ordinance 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 8 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted 04-41, as amended) to create more flexibility for home-based businesses in the Immokalee 1 Urban Area, thereby allowing additional opportunities for home-based occupations. 2 3 Policy 21.2.34: Financial Incentives 4 Within two (2) years of adoption, Collier County, in cooperation with the Immokalee CRA, will 5 develop a comprehensive financial incentive strategy to promote economic development in the 6 Immokalee area and identify funding sources to maintain adequate funding of such incentive 7 programs. 8 9 Policy 21.2.45: Agriculture-Related Business Uses 10 In recognition of the economic importance of agriculture, the within two (2) years of adoption, 11 Collier County will initiate amendments to the LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as amended) to: 12 • allow agriculture research and development facilities, agri-business offices and 13 headquarters, and facilities, offices, headquarters and apparatuses associated with an 14 alternative energy use. These uses will be allowed on properties zoned (A) Rural 15 Agricultural, within the Low Residential Subdistrict land use designation; and 16 • to allow small agriculture-related business uses, such as fruit and vegetable stands, and 17 farmers markets, within certain, to be determined, non-agricultural Residential zoning 18 districts., within two (2) years of the of the effective date of this Policy. 19 Compatibility criteria and development standards shall be included in proposed LDC 20 amendments. 21 22 OBJECTIVE 21.3: 23 Promote and expand tourism, eco-tourism, recreation, entertainment, and cultural opportunities 24 in Immokalee in order to diversify the Immokalee economy, and improve quality of life. 25 26 Policy 21.3.1: Tourism, Recreational, Entertainment and Cultural Opportunities 27 Collier County will encourage the expansion of tourism, entertainment, cultural and recreational 28 opportunities, such as restaurants, movie theaters, museums and public spaces within two (2) 29 years of the effective date of this Policy. It is anticipated that the Collier County will work with the 30 Immokalee CRA, Immokalee Chamber of Commerce, Office of Business and Economic 31 Development, tThe Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau, and 32 other public and private organizations to promote increasing tourism of Lake Trafford, Immokalee 33 Regional Raceway, Pepper Ranch Preserve, Immokalee Pioneer Museum at Roberts Ranch 34 and Anne Olesky Park, and future tourism, recreational, entertainment and cultural attractions. 35 36 Policy 21.3.2: Eco-tourism 37 Collier County will encourage the development of ecotourism in the Immokalee Aarea, with a 38 particular focus on Lake Trafford and surrounding RT designated lands. It is anticipated that the 39 County will work with the Immokalee CRA, Immokalee Chamber of Commerce, The Greater 40 Naples Chamber of Commerce, Office of Business and Economic Development, the Naples, 41 Marco Island, and Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau, and other public and private 42 organizations to promote these opportunities. 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted 1 Policy 21.3.3: Seminole Casino Immokalee 2 Collier County will continue efforts to work with the Seminole Tribe of Florida to: a) integrate 3 future plans for the Seminole Casino Hotel and Reservation within an Immokalee-wide tourism 4 development and marketing campaign; and b) address impacts of the expansion of the 5 Seminole Casino Hotel, and other resort structures and uses on the community and surrounding 6 area. 7 8 Policy 21.3.4: Entertainment Area 9 In recognition of the fact that the casino is a significant attraction, Collier County will encourage 10 the development of an entertainment area near the casino that is complementary and 11 connected to Immokalee’s existing downtown core. 12 13 OBJECTIVE 21.4: 14 Enhance and expand educational and cultural facilities and opportunities in Immokalee. 15 16 Policy 21.4.1: Research and Development 17 Collier County will seek to attract educational research facilities, similar to the Southwest Florida 18 Research and Education Center, to Immokalee. It is anticipated that the County will work with 19 the Immokalee CRA, public and private colleges and universities, and other public and private 20 organizations to promote these opportunities. 21 22 Policy 1.4.2: Education and Training Programs 23 Collier County will seek to partner with other organizations including the Collier County School 24 Board and CareerSource Southwest Florida to enhance the availability and variety of training 25 programs in Immokalee. (Reorganized) 26 27 OBJECTIVE 21.5: 28 Collier County will support the implementation of the Immokalee Redevelopment Area Plan 29 (Resolution No. 2000-181 and 2004-384, as amended).Promote and support development and 30 redevelopment initiatives in the Immokalee Area. 31 32 Policy 21.5.1: Technical Assistance 33 Within two (2) years of the of the effective adoption,date Collier County will initiate the review of 34 existing programs meant to provide technical assistance for the establishment and permitting of 35 new or expanding businesses and make recommendations to better implement these programs 36 specific to the needs of the Immokalee community. This technical assistance will be made 37 available through the CRA. It is anticipated that Collier County will work with the CRA, and 38 public and private organizations, to complete this review and make recommendations. 39 40 Policy 21.5.2: Infill and Downtown Redevelopment 41 Collier County will promote infill development and redevelopment within the Commercial-Mixed 42 Use Subdistrict through amendments to the Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance 04-41, 43 as amended) that facilitate mixed-use projects and provide for flexible performance-based 44 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 10 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted incentives. 1 2 Policy 21.5.3: Alternative Funding 3 Collier County will continue to support efforts to seek additional state and federal funding to 4 improve infrastructure and housing, may seek to partner with Rural Neighborhoods, Front Porch 5 Florida and other similar entities and to promote or expedite the development and 6 redevelopment of the community.residential structures and properties within Immokalee by 7 pursuing alternative funding sources on an ongoing basis. 8 9 GOAL 32: TO PROVIDE A DIVERSITY OF SAFE AND SANITARY HOUSING QUALITY 10 NEIGHBORHOODS FOR ALL RESIDENTS OF THE IMMOKALEE URBAN AREA. 11 12 OBJECTIVE 2.1 13 Collier County, in coordination with the Immokalee CRA and residents, will identify 14 neighborhood improvements needed to elevate the neighborhood quality of life. 15 16 Policy 2.1.1: Neighborhood Inventory 17 Within two (2) years of adoption, Collier County will initiate an inventory of existing 18 neighborhoods. The purpose of the inventory is to identify opportunities to improve 19 neighborhood recreation, sidewalks, lighting, transit stops, stormwater management, housing, 20 and community facilities. 21 22 Policy 2.1.2: Neighborhood Improvement Plans 23 Incorporating the findings of the neighborhood inventories, Collier County will create 24 Neighborhood Improvement Plans, with coordination of all applicable County departments and 25 the Immokalee CRA, to provide a multi-disciplinary approach to planning for identified 26 neighborhood improvements. 27 28 OBJECTIVE 32.2: 29 Collier County shall promote the conservation and rehabilitation of housing in Immokalee 30 neighborhoods. 31 32 Policy 32.2.12: Funding Opportunities 33 Collier County, in coordination with federal, state, and other local agencies and private 34 organizations will seek funding for the housing needs identified in the Immokalee Housing 35 Condition Inventory.Neighborhood Improvement Plans. 36 37 Policy 32.2.23: Substandard Housing 38 Collier County will periodically update its programs for the repair, removal, or replacement of 39 substandard housing units in Immokalee., based on the most recent Immokalee Housing 40 Condition Inventory. 41 42 Policy 32.2.34: Displaced Occupants 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 11 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted Collier County will coordinate with local non-profit social service organizations to provide 1 relocation assistance for occupants who are displaced from substandard dwelling units. 2 3 Policy 32.2.45: Housing Code Enforcement 4 Collier County shall make reasonable effort to require that substandard housing be brought into 5 compliance or eliminated. Enforcement eEfforts will focus on properties that are abandoned, 6 owned by an absentee landlord, or whose operation is not in compliance with the Collier County 7 Land Development Code or Code of Laws and Ordinances. 8 9 Policy 2.2.5: Farm Labor Housing Land Development Regulations 10 Collier County, in cooperation with the Florida Department of Health, will review and revise, as 11 necessary, the LDC provisions regulating farm labor housing within the Immokalee Urban Area 12 to eliminate regulations that are duplicative to federal and state provisions.(Reorganized) 13 14 Policy 2.2.6: Interagency Coordination 15 Collier County will coordinate with the Immokalee CRA and other housing providers and 16 regulators to review and consider incentives to improve the housing quantity and quality in the 17 Immokalee Urban Area. (Reorganized) 18 19 OBJECTIVE 32.3: 20 The County will continue to explore and provide innovative programs and regulatory reforms t o 21 reduce development costs and promote safe and sanitary affordable-workforce housing quality 22 neighborhoods and a full range of housing for all Immokalee residents. 23 24 Policy 32.3.1: Housing Grant Opportunities 25 Collier County, in coordination with the Immokalee CRA, will pursue government grants and 26 loans for affordable-workforce housing. 27 28 Policy 32.3.2: Affordable-Workforce and Gap Housing Incentives 29 Housing affordability in Immokalee will be incentivize in part through the implementation of the 30 approved strategies within the Collier County Community Housing Plan.Collier County will 31 review its affordable-workforce housing (including gap) incentives to determine the effectiveness 32 of existing provisions and whether additional incentives are necessary or desired. 33 34 GOAL 43: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE AND EFFICIENT PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND 35 FACILITIES FOR THE IMMOKALEE URBAN AREA. 36 37 OBJECTIVE 3.1: 38 To annually identify the priorities of the Immokalee community and the Immokalee CRA related 39 to capital improvements and other activities that will further the goals, objectives and polic ies of 40 the IAMP.(Reorganized) 41 42 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 12 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted Policy 3.1.1: Capital Projects and Studies 1 Collier County will coordinate with the Immokalee CRA on an annual basis to develop a 2 prioritized list of Immokalee specific capital projects and studies that will further the Goals, 3 Objectives, and Policies of the IAMP. The County and the Immokalee CRA shall identify 4 potential funding sources for all or a portion of the projected cost associated with these projects 5 and studies. This list shall be provided to the BCC prior to its annual budgeting process in order 6 to allow the BCC to consider Immokalee’s priorities in relation to available funding and staffing 7 resources. (Reorganized) 8 9 OBJECTIVE 43.21: 10 To provide a comprehensive system of parks and recreational facilities that supports diverse 11 active and passive recreational activities within the Immokalee area through the implementation 12 of the Collier County Parks & Recreation Master Plan for the Immokalee Area. 13 14 Policy 43.21.1: Priority Park Sites 15 Collier County will prioritize the development of future Immokalee community parks within, or 16 adjacent to, the most densely populated urban areas to ensure convenient access by the 17 majority of residents, and in coordination with the Immokalee CRA, will identify locations for 18 public plazas, greens, or urban parks. 19 20 Policy 43.21.2: Community Input 21 Collier County will solicit community input to ensure provision of appropriate public facilities to 22 address the demographics of the Immokalee Urban Area. 23 24 Policy 43.21.3: Expansion of Parks and Trails 25 Collier County will expand the network of parks and connect recreational areas throughout the 26 community where appropriate and feasible. and as identified in the Parks Master Plan. 27 28 Policy 43.21.4: Encourage Active Lifestyles 29 Collier County will encourage outdoor activity and active lifestyles by creating new 30 neighborhood recreational areas facilities, such as ball fields, soccer fields, basketball courts, tot 31 lots, and jungle gyms, as appropriate to Immokalee’s demographics and as feasible in each 32 neighborhood. These opportunities shall be identified in the Neighborhood Improvement Plans. 33 34 Policy 43.21.5: Use of Vacant Residential Parcels 35 Subject to available funding, Collier County will consider acquiring vacant residential parcels in 36 order to develop new neighborhood recreation areas parks. These parcels may be small in size 37 and should be evenly distributed throughout the community. These opportunities shall be 38 identified in the Neighborhood Improvement Plans. 39 40 Policy 4.1.6: Park Amenities 41 Collier County will evaluate park amenities and identify deficiencies, such as drinking fountains, 42 shelters, lighting, sanitary facilities, and emergency phones for the convenience and security of 43 park users. The list of needed improvements will be updated in the most recent Community and 44 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 13 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted Regional Park Master Plan. (This is accomplished through the current Parks and 1 Recreation Master Plan update) 2 3 4 OBJECTIVE 43.32: 5 To provide a network of roads, sidewalks, and bike paths to support growth, to provide for the in 6 a manner that allows for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, bicyclists 7 motorized, and non-motorized vehicles. 8 9 Policy 3.3.1: Complete Streets 10 Roadways within Immokalee shall be planned, designed and constructed in a context-sensitive, 11 multi-modal approach, implementing access for transportation users of all ages and disabilities, 12 in a manner that promotes safe, efficient movement of people and goods, whether by car, truck, 13 public transit, assistive device, foot or bicycle. 14 15 Policy 43.32.21: Bicycle and Pedestrian Pathways Plan 16 Related to pathways specifically iIn the Immokalee Urban Area, the Collier County 5-Year 17 Pathways Plan will give priority will be given to projects to linking existing and future residential 18 neighborhoods with commercial and employment areas, as well as schools, libraries, 19 community parks, recreation sites and other public service areas. Input will be sought from 20 landowners and residents to identify priority. The Collier County 5-Year Pathways Plan will 21 depict existing and planned future pathways for the Immokalee community. 22 23 Policy 43.3.32: Long Range Transportation Improvements 24 Collier County will explore the possibility of accelerating the implementation of the Collier 25 County Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Long Range Transportation Plan, subject to 26 available funding, as a precursor to initiating new investments in the Immokalee area. In 27 particular, the County will support and encourage: 28 29 • the Florida Department of Transportation in the widening of SR 82 between I-75 and SR 29 30 as a first step in improving transportation access to Immokalee; 31 • the building of the SR 29 Bypass Route to create direct access to SR 82 and SR 29 from the 32 Immokalee Regional Airport and Florida Tradeport; 33 • the Florida Department of Transportation to improve road conditions along State-owned 34 roads; 35 • the creation of new, or expansion of existing, transportation corridors that improve access 36 between Immokalee, the City of Naples, and coastal Collier County; and 37 Policy 3.3.4: Local Transportation Network Improvements 38 Recognizing that a significant segment of the of the community’s population uses public transit, 39 walks or bicycles to work and to school, within three (3) years of adoption, Collier County will 40 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 14 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted initiate a transportation planning study with recommendations to identify potential routes to 1 improve connectivity of the collector and local street grid to expand public transit service, and 2 bicycle and pedestrian access. 3 4 Policy 3.3.5: Private Roads 5 Collier County will encourage, through incentives, that private roads be brought up to County 6 standards and offered to the County for acceptance and maintenance, when deemed 7 appropriate. 8 9 Policy 43.32.64: Access from Immokalee Regional Airport to Future SR 29 Bypass 10 Collier County will continue to coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), 11 and with landowners and other stakeholders, to identify one or more a preferred routes to 12 connect the Airport and the future SR 29 Bypass. 13 14 Policy 43.32.75: Safety Improvements 15 As funding becomes available, Collier County will implement the 2011 Immokalee Walkableility 16 Community Study, funded by prepared for the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization, 17 identifying locations for new sidewalks, traffic signals, signage, crosswalks, bike paths and 18 street lighting for the purpose of improving pedestrian and bicycle circulation and safety. within 19 prioritized areas within the Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU). 20 21 Policy 43.32.86: Public Transit Routes 22 Collier County will consider expansion of public transit routes to comprehensively cover the 23 downtown area, connect significant employment centers and public facilities, and interconnect 24 to adjacent communities, where deemed appropriate. 25 26 Policy 4.2.6: Enhanced Transit Services 27 Collier County will encourage the provision of a wide array of transit services, such as bike-and-28 ride and medical transport. (Transit operations are defined and implemented by the Public 29 Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement Division and change with technology. This plan 30 appropriately focuses on improving corridors and transit routes.) 31 32 Policy 4.2.7 3.3.9: Transportation Concurrency Alternatives (for SR 29) 33 Within two (2) years of the effective date of this Policy When warranted, Collier County shall 34 identify alternatives methods to allow non-residential development in the Immokalee Urban Area 35 to proceed with limited exceptions and/or a mitigated waiver from existing concurrency 36 requirements due to the economic and job creation benefits such development would provide. 37 The following shall be considered as a part of the analysis: 38 39 a. Establishing a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) or Transportation 40 Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) or other alternative that would allow limited 41 exceptions and/or mitigated waivers from concurrency for economic development, diversity, 42 and job creation in the Immokalee Urban Area; and 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 15 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted b. Potential limitations on such exceptions and/or waivers from concurrency including: 1 1. Limiting applicability to certain locations, in the Urban Area such as the Airport/ 2 Tradeport, other lands around the aAirport, and the Central Business District corridor 3 (Urban Infill and Redevelopment Areadesignated lands); 4 2. Requiring a case-by case approval of any such exception or waiver based upon certain 5 targeted and measurable objectives, including Transit Oriented Design, job creation and 6 other commitments by the developer that would be deemed to be beneficial to the 7 community; and 8 3. Limiting the duration, or requiring mandatory periodic reviews, of the continued feasibility 9 of any such exception or waiver process. 10 11 OBJECTIVE 43.43: 12 To improve stormwater management and surface drainage in Immokalee. 13 14 Policy 43.43.1: Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan 15 Within two (2) years of the effective date of this Policy, Collier County’s Stormwater Management 16 staff, in coordination with other County departments, will continue to implement the 17 recommendations contained within the Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan (as amended), as 18 funding becomes available. Collier County will implement, to the degree necessary on a phased 19 schedule, the Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan and its recommendations for the particular 20 locations (Lake Trafford, Fish Creek, Madison Creek Ditch, and Sanitation Road Slough Cross-21 Drain Additions) where significant drainage issues are known. 22 23 OBJECTIVE 4.4: 24 To provide an efficient and economical solid waste management system that ensures public 25 health and safety and protects the environmental resources of the area. 26 27 Policy 4.4.1: Clean Immokalee Plan 28 Collier County will develop a “Clean Immokalee” Plan to improve the physical appearance of the 29 streets and lots through education, enforcement, and cleanup activities. This program will solicit 30 input and participation from the CRA and MSTU and community organizations and 31 neighborhood associations. 32 (This objective and policy will move into the CRA Plan.) 33 34 GOAL 54: TO PROTECT IMPORTANT NATURAL RESOURCES THROUGH THE 35 IMPLEMENTATION OF IMMOKALEE-SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND 36 POLICIES. 37 38 OBJECTIVE 54.1: 39 To address the protection of natural resources in Immokalee, including Lake Trafford and 40 connected wetland systems, and listed species habitat including upland habitat used by listed 41 species, through incentives and innovative techniques not otherwise addressed in the 42 Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 16 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted 1 Policy 54.1.1: Incentives and Innovative Land Development Regulations 2 Collier County will promote the preservation of native vegetation in the Immokalee Urban Area 3 exceeding the minimum required amounts set forth in CCME Policy 6.1.1, and pursuant to IAMP 4 Policy 21.1.3. This may be accomplished by utilizing incentives and innovative land 5 development regulations, including but not limited to: cluster development, transferable 6 development rights, density bonuses, and flexible development standards to incentivize infill 7 development and redevelopment within targeted MR, HR, C-MU and I-MU designated lands. In 8 order to qualify for any such incentives, , on-site or off-site preservation, if allowed in specifically 9 targeted areas within the Immokalee Urban designated area, the preserve acreage shall exceed 10 the minimum applicable amounts acreage set forth in CCME Policy 6.1.1. by at least 10 percent. 11 Incentives may be provided based upon a sliding scale, providing greater levels of incentive for 12 greater amounts of preservation above the applicable minimum amounts set forth in CCME 13 Policy 6.1.1. 14 15 Within two (2) years of the effective date of this Policy, the County will explore the feasibility of 16 adopting a TDR program in the Immokalee Urban Area to further this Objective and Policy 2.1.3. 17 18 Within two years of the effective adoption, date of this Policy the Collier County shall 19 initiate amend ments to the LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as amended), shall be amended 20 to provide for other incentives and innovative land development regulations, including but not 21 limited to cluster development and flexible development standards, that do not require an 22 amendment to the IAMP. 23 24 Policy 54.1.2: Lake Trafford Development Water Quality 25 Recognizing the importance of Lake Trafford, and the surrounding wetlands and natural 26 habitat, to the ecosystem, economy and ecotourism activities in Immokalee, proposed 27 development within the adjacent to Lake Trafford watershed boundary will conform to best 28 management practices (BMPs) regarding water quality in order to avoid or minimize adverse 29 impacts to the lake and its surrounding wetlands andor natural habitat. These BMPs will 30 primarily include measures or design standards recognized by the Department of 31 Environmental Protection (DEP) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that address 32 increased or enhanced onsite treatment of storm water runoff, and measures to address Total 33 Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) and nutrient loading. Within two (2) years of the effective 34 adoption, date of this Policy the Collier County, in conjunction with any applicable state or 35 federal agencies, will initiate amendments to the LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as amended) to 36 establish specific best management practices and will identify the specific locations where 37 such best management practices shall be required. The Lake Trafford watershed boundary 38 Drainage Basin shall be illustrated by map in the LDC and will be the geographic area 39 intended for implementation of these BMPs. 40 41 Policy 54.1.3: Lake Trafford Remediation 42 Collier County will continue to cooperate with state and federal agencies on remediation, 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 17 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted restoration, and long-term management efforts at Lake Trafford (e.g., organic sediment and 1 invasive plant removal) to improve the health and recreational potential of the Llake. 2 3 Policy 5.1.4 Conservation Designation 4 During the next Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) cycle, and at least during each 5 subsequent EAR cycle, Collier County shall identify and map lands within the Immokalee Urban 6 Area owned by a public entity, where such lands were acquired for the purposes of 7 conservation, provided for in the Collier County Future Land Use Conservation Designation. The 8 County shall then consider whether such lands should be designated Conservation on the 9 FLUM. (Designating properties as conservation may bring about unintended 10 consequences to the detriment of eco-tourism by limiting the recreational access to the 11 properties.) 12 13 GOAL 56: TO ALLOW AND ENCOURAGE A MIXTURE OF LAND USES THAT IS 14 APPROPRIATE FOR IMMOKALEE. 15 16 OBJECTIVE 65.1: 17 The Immokalee Area Master Plan and its Future Land Use Map will apply to all Ddevelopment 18 Oorders within the Immokalee Urban Area. The Future Land Use Map is designed to coordinate 19 land use with the natural environment; maintain and develop cohesive neighborhood units; 20 promote a sound economy; and encourage desirable growth and energy efficient development 21 patterns. Standards and allowed uses for each District and Subdistrict are identified in the Land 22 Use Designation Description Section. 23 24 Policy 65.1.1: Future Land Use Designation 25 The Immokalee Area Master Plan’s URBAN Future Land Use Designation includes the 26 following Future Land Use Districts, Subdistricts, Overlays and Features: 27 28 A. URBAN – MIXED USE DISTRICT 29 1. Low Residential Subdistrict 30 2. Medium Residential Subdistrict 31 3. High Residential Subdistrict 32 4. Commercial – Mixed Use Subdistrict 33 5. Recreational/Tourist Subdistrict 34 B. URBAN – INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 35 1. Industrial Subdistrict 36 2. Industrial – Mixed Use Subdistrict 37 3. Industrial – Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict 38 39 C. OVERLAYS AND FEATURES 40 1. Lake Trafford /Camp Keais Strand System Overlay 41 2. Seminole Reservation 42 3. Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 18 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted 3.4. Industrial - Mixed Use Commercial Overlay 1 2 Policy 65.1.2: Compatibility between Land Uses 3 Compatibility between lower and higher intensity uses will be achieved through land 4 development regulations specifically applicable to the Immokalee Urban Area. 5 6 Policy 6.1.3: Right to Farm 7 Lawfully existing agricultural activities may continue within the Urban Designated Area as 8 provided by the State of Florida Right to Farm Act, 823.14, F.S. (Redundant to F.S) 9 10 Policy 6.1.4: Farmworker Housing 11 Collier County recognizes the need for farm labor to support the County’s agricultural industry. 12 Collier County will encourage the provision of housing for seasonal, temporary or migrant 13 farmworkers, provided that such housing is consistent with Migrant Labor Housing provisions 14 of Section 64E-14, Florida Administrative Code, and does not conflict with the existing zoning 15 districts or the Immokalee Area Future Land Use Map. (Farmworker Housing is addressed 16 in Policy 2.2.6) 17 18 Policy 65.1.35: Compact Mixed-Use Development 19 Collier County will encourage compact mixed-use development in appropriate zoning districts 20 and particularly within the HR and C-MU designations, as an innovative planning technique to 21 create walkable communities, reduce vehicle miles traveled, and increase energy efficiency. 22 23 Policy 65.1.46: Mobile Homes within the Immokalee Urban Area 24 New mobile homes shall be allowed in the Immokalee Urban Area as a temporary residence 25 as identified in LDC Section 5.04.02.C; or within an existing mobile home park or subdivision 26 as identified in LDC Section 2.03.07.G.6; or as part of a new mobile home park or subdivision 27 approved on lands with existing zoning that permits mobile homes; or on individual lots or 28 parcels with existing zoning that permits mobile homes.in the Low Residential (LR) or Medium 29 Residential (MR) Subdistricts. 30 31 Mobile homes shall also be permitted on properties located at 1101, 1121 and 1123 Alachua 32 Street, Immokalee Florida, in accordance with the Mediated Settlement Agreement and Mutual 33 Release relating to Case No. 08-9355-CA and Case No. 09-1281-CA, dated February 26, 2013 34 (see OR Book 4895, Page 1963 et seq. of the Official Public Records of Collier County, Florida). 35 The Agreement references both the Commerce Center-Mixed Use Subdistrict of the Urban 36 Mixed-Use District and the Commerce Center-Industrial Subdistrict of the Urban-Industrial 37 District of the IAMP in effect on February 26, 2013. 38 39 Policy 65.1.57: Public Educational Plants 40 Public educational plants and public ancillary plants shall be allowed as provided for in Policy 41 5.1614 of the Future Land Use Element. 42 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 19 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted Policy 65.1.68: Rezonings and Growth Management Plan Consistency by Policy 1 A. All rezonings must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. For properties that 2 have zoning in place prior to a change in are zoned inconsistent with the Land Use 3 Designation Description Section, where the prior zoning allows for a higher density or 4 intensity than the new Land Use Designation are such properties may be deemed to be 5 consistent with the Growth Management Plan by policy, and such properties the property 6 may be rezoned as followsif the property’s zoning at the time of adoption allows for a higher 7 density or intensity than the new Land Use Designation. For such properties, the following 8 provisions apply: 9 1. For such commercially-zoned properties, zoning changes will be allowed provided the 10 new zoning district is the same or a lower intensity commercially zoning district as the 11 existing zoning district, and provided the overall intensity of commercial land use 12 allowed by the existing zoning district is not exceeded in the new zoning district . A 13 zoning change of such commercial-zoned properties to a residential zoning district is 14 allowed as provided for in the Density Rating System of this Master Plan. 15 2. For such industrially-zoned properties, zoning changes will be allowed provided the 16 new zoning district is the same or a lower intensity industrial or commercial zoning 17 district as the existing zoning district, and provided the overall intensity of industrial 18 land use allowed by the existing zoning district is not exceeded in the new zoning 19 district. 20 3. For such residentially-zoned properties, zoning changes will be allowed provided the 21 authorized number of dwelling units in the new zoning district does not exceed that 22 authorized by the existing zoning district, and provided the overall intensity of 23 development allowed by the new zoning district does not exceed that allowed by the 24 existing zoning district. 25 4. Properties subject to the above limitations deemed consistent by policy with the IAMP 26 may be combined and developed with other property, whether such other property 27 deemed consistent by policy or deemed consistent with the Land Use Designation 28 Section. has had a change in Land Use Designation. For residential and mixed-use 29 developments only, the accumulated density between these properties may be 30 distributed throughout the project, as provided for in the Density Rating System or the 31 underlying subdistrict, as applicable. 32 5. Overall intensity of development shall be determined based upon a comparison of 33 public facility impacts as allowed by the existing zoning district and the proposed 34 zoning district. 35 5.6. As consistent with the LDC Section 2.03.07, Overlay Zoning Districts. 36 6.7. This Section does not apply to properties where changes to the Land Use 37 Designation are initiated by the property owner via a Growth Management Plan 38 amendment application. 39 40 B. Any property owner who believes that they have been adversely affected by this IAMP 41 may utilize the procedures set forth in Chapter 9 (Vested Rights and Takings 42 Determinations) of the LDC. All applications must be submitted within one year from the 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 20 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted adopted effective date of the IAMP or applicable IAMP amendment. This procedure shall 1 be considered supplemental to any other claim or remedy that the property owner may 2 have. Notice of the Adoption of this Plan and the one-year time frame within which any 3 property owner who believes that they have been adversely affected by this IAMP may 4 utilize the procedures set forth in Chapter 9 (Vested Rights and Takings Determinations) 5 of the LDC shall be provided with a minimum 1/8-page notice in one or more newspapers 6 of general circulation in the Immokalee area within 15 days of Adoption of this plan by the 7 BCC. 8 9 Policy 6.1.10: Non-Residential Development 10 Non-residential development in the Immokalee Urban Area will be limited to no more than 8.45 11 million square feet through the 2040 Planning Horizon. Non-residential development includes 12 commercial, retail, office, industrial, institutional and governmental buildings, but excludes 13 hotels, motels, government subsidized, affordable or farmworker housing, and development 14 within the Seminole Reservation. Collier County staff shall maintain records on the amount of 15 non-residential development in Immokalee and shall review, and update as necessary, the non-16 residential development limit. (Specifying the non-residential acreage is no longer a DCA 17 requirement and staff should not have to track it.) 18 19 GOAL 67: TO ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS THAT ARE 20 APPROPRIATE FOR IMMOKALEE. 21 22 OBJECTIVE 67.1: 23 Collier County shall develop Immokalee-specific land development regulations to the extent 24 required by this Master Plan, and which reflect the unique character and cultural diversity of the 25 residents, encourage pedestrian-friendly urban form, and promote energy efficiency. 26 27 Policy 67.1.1: Development of Land Development Code Standards 28 Within two (2) years of adoption ing this Policy, Collier County, in coordination with the 29 Immokalee Community Redevelopment AgencyCRA, will initiate the development of LDC 30 standards specific to Immokalee to address the unique needs of the Immokalee Urban Area. 31 These standards shall include those related to permitted and conditional land uses; density and 32 intensity; signage; landscaping and buffering; native preservation retention; off-street and on-33 street parking and loading; architectural design; development standards, including setbacks to 34 Lake Trafford; floor area ratio for certain nonresidential uses; and site access. 35 36 Policy 67.1.2: Location of Service Uses 37 Collier County will encourage community parks, and other community facilities to be placed 38 within one-half mile of residential and mixed-use centers, in order to encourage walking, 39 bicycling and non- vehicular access to and from these service uses. Collier County shall require 40 interconnection of pedestrian facilities to the existing pedestrian network. 41 42 Policy 7.1.3: Innovative Design 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 21 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted Within two (2) years of the effective date of this policy Collier County and the Immokalee 1 Community Redevelopment Agency will develop incentives and/or regulations to promote: 2 enhanced pedestrian access; pedestrian- friendly design; compact mixed-use development and 3 redevelopment; shared infrastructure; enhanced public spaces and signage; and use of public 4 transit. (redundant to Policy 6.1.1) 5 6 Policy 67.1.34: Downtown Pedestrian Amenities 7 Within two (2) years of the effective date of this policy adoption, Collier County, in coordination 8 with the Immokalee CRA Community Redevelopment Agency, will evaluate the need for 9 additional passive recreation and outdoor dining and entertainment opportunities along 10 downtown streets, and, if warranted, adopt amendments and incentives to the Collier County 11 LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as amended) to incentivize and encourage the development of these 12 amenities, provided the free and safe movement of pedestrians is maintained. 13 14 Policy 76.1.45: Central Business District 15 Within two (2) years of adoption, the effective date of this policy Collier County, in coordination 16 with the Immokalee CRA, will initiate a review of the Public Realm Plan and the Central 17 Business District Form-Based Guidelines. Based on the review, Collier County will initiate 18 amendments to the LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as amended), as necessary. to include a Central 19 Business District in Immokalee to include the Public Realm Plan and the Central Business 20 District Form Based Guidelines. The District will be depicted in the LDC and will encourage 21 high-intensity, multi-story, and pedestrian-oriented commercial and mixed-use development. 22 23 Policy 76.1.56: Safe Neighborhood Initiatives 24 Collier County will coordinate with local and state law enforcement, developers, and citizens to 25 seek funding opportunities available under the Safe Neighborhood Act (SectionChapter 163, 26 Part IV.501, F.S.) or other programs to improve safety within the Immokalee community and to 27 provide for safe streets. This may include implementation of CPTED (crime prevention through 28 environmental design) strategies, where such strategies are compatible with the community 29 design objectives set forth herein. 30 31 GOAL 78: TO COORDINATE AND PROVIDE FOR THE CONTINUAL EXCHANGE OF 32 INFORMATION WITH THE SEMINOLE TRIBAL COUNCIL, COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL 33 BOARD, OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, UTILITY PROVIDERS, AND NON-34 PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS., THE SCHOOL BOARD, AND THE SEMINOLE TRIBAL 35 COUNCIL THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN. 36 37 OBJECTIVE 87.1: 38 Pursue effective interlocal and inter-governmental coordination in order to provide a range of 39 human services to Immokalee residents. 40 41 Policy 78.1.1: Regional Economic Development Initiatives 42 Collier County will collaborate in regional initiatives with local and regional economic 43 development organizations and the State of Florida to assist the Immokalee area in attracting 44 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 22 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted businesses, marketing, and developing infrastructure. 1 2 Policy 78.1.2: Redevelopment Implementation Partners 3 Collier County, in coordination with the CRA and not-for-profit organizations, will actively 4 coordinate efforts with the Immokalee CRA and not-for-profit organizations to implement the 5 Immokalee Area Master Plan and the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area Plan. 6 7 Policy 78.1.3: Immokalee Government Services Center 8 Collier County will continue to support an Immokalee- based government center that will co-9 locate various county entities and departments to ensure effective collaboration and services to 10 support community needs. This office may include, but is not limited to, the following services: 11 12 a. Animal control 13 b. Board of County Commissioners Office 14 c. Branch Office of the Collier County Tax Collector 15 d. Child support enforcement 16 e. Code enforcement 17 f. Court 18 g. Domestic violence services 19 h. Economic Development 20 i. Emergency management services 21 j. Emergency medical services 22 k. Emergency Operations Center (EOC) 23 l. Housing and Human Services 24 m. Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency 25 n. Permitting 26 o. Planning and Zoning, and economic development needs 27 n.p. Public health services 28 o.q. Veterans Services 29 30 Policy 7.1.4: Immokalee Civic Center 31 Within one (1) year of adoption, Collier County will coordinate with the Immokalee CRA to 32 explore opportunities for an Immokalee civic center. 33 34 Policy 7.1.5: Satellite Emergency Operations Center 35 Within one (1) year of adoption, Collier County, in coordination with the Immokalee Unmet 36 Needs Coalition, will initiate the development of an Immokalee Emergency Management Plan 37 and identify opportunities to establish a satellite Emergency Operations Center to activate in the 38 event of an emergency. 39 40 41 (The remaining of the page is intentionally left blank) 42 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 23 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted 1 LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION 2 The Immokalee Area Master Plan Future Land Use Designations include the following Districts 3 and Subdistricts. The following describes land use designations shown on the Immokalee 4 Master Plan Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land 5 uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not 6 guarantee that a zoning district request will be approved. 7 8 A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 9 The purpose of this District is to allow residential and nonresidential land uses, including mixed 10 uses. Nonresidential uses are subject to the intensity limitations in Policy 6.1.10. Mixed uses 11 can be located within individual buildings and/or projects in areas deemed appropriate and 12 identified on the FLUM. Nonresidential uses allowed in the Residential subdistricts include, but 13 are not limited to: agriculture, home-based businesses, recreation and open space uses, 14 churches, libraries, cemeteries, public and private schools, day-care centers, and essential 15 services, as defined in the Land Development Code, except as may be limited within a specific 16 subdistrict or overlay. 17 18 New commercial development may be allowed in the Low Residential, Medium Residential or 19 High Residential subdistricts through Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning, subject to the 20 following limitations: 21 22 Commercial development may be permitted within a PUD, provided the following size and 23 development criteria are met. The commercial component within a PUD may be allowed to 24 develop up to the maximum acreage specified in the table below: 25 26 CATEGORY I CATEGORY II CATEGORY III PUD Acres >80 >160 >300 Min. Gross Density 2.5 du/gross acre 2.5 du/gross acre 3.0 du/gross acre Max. Commercial Acres 5 acres 10 acres 20 acres Permitted Zoning C-2 C-2, C-3 C-2 through C-4 In addition to the above criteria, the following standards must also be met: 27 28 a. Commercial zoning shall be no closer than one (1) mile to any lands designated C- MU and 29 no closer than one mile from the nearest PUD commercial zoning of ten acres or greater in 30 size, unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners; 31 32 b. The configuration of the commercial parcel shall be no more frontage than depth, unless 33 otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners; 34 35 c. Commercial zoning or development shall be no closer than aone-quarter (¼) mile from the 36 nearest existing elementary school boundary, unless otherwise authorized by the Board of 37 County Commissioners; 38 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 24 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted 1 d. The commercial development shall be integrated with the residential portion of the project, 2 including common elements such as signage, and providing vehicular and non-vehicular 3 interconnection; and 4 5 e. No construction in the commercial designated area shall be allowed until construction has 6 commenced on at least 30% of the project’s residential units, unless otherwise authorized 7 by the Board of County Commissioners. 8 9 1. Low Residential Subdistrict (LR) 10 The purpose of this subdistrict is to provide for low density residential development and 11 supporting ancillary uses. Mobile homes are allowed pursuant to the provisions of IAMP Policy 12 5.1.4. Residential densities are allowed as provided below, except for properties within the Lake 13 Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay. 14 15 • Base Density: Four (4) dwelling units per gross acre. 16 17 • Maximum Density: Eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre, inclusive of all density 18 bonuses. Densities above the base density can only be achieved through available 19 density bonuses. 20 21 As agriculture is a significant economic driver in Immokalee, the following uses will be allowed in 22 accordance with IAMP Policy 1.2.4: 23 24 • agricultural research and development technology facilities, 25 • agri-business offices and headquarters, and 26 • facilities, offices, headquarters and apparatuses associated with an alternative energy 27 use. 28 focusing on agri-business and reliant upon proximity to active agriculture; 29 are also allowed through a Conditional Use process. Such facilities must demonstrate 30 compatibility with adjacent properties 31 32 33 2. Medium Residential Subdistrict (MR) 34 The purpose of this subdistrict is to provide for a mixture of housing types and supporting 35 ancillary uses. Mobile homes are allowed pursuant to the provisions of IAMP Policiyes 5.1.4. 36 6.1.6. and 6.1.9. and 6.1.7. Residential densities are allowed as provided below, except for 37 properties within the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay. 38 39 • Base Density: Six (6) dwellings units per gross acre. 40 41 • Maximum Density: Fourteen (14) dwelling units per gross acre, inclusive of all density 42 bonuses. Densities above the base density can only be achieved through available 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 25 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted density bonuses. 1 2 3. High Residential Subdistrict (HR): 3 The purpose of this subdistrict is to provide for a mixture of housing type and supporting 4 ancillary uses. Mobile homes are allowed pursuant to the provisions of IAMP Policiyes 5.1.4. 5 6.1.6. and 6.1.9 and 6.1.7. Residential densities are allowed as provided below, except for 6 properties within the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay. 7 8 • Base Density: Eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre. 9 10 • Maximum Density: Sixteen (16) dwelling units per gross acre, inclusive of all density 11 bonuses. Densities above the base density can only be achieved through available 12 density bonuses. 13 14 4. Commercial - Mixed Use Subdistrict (C-MU): 15 The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for pedestrian-scaled, higher density residential and 16 mixed-use development, employment and recreational opportunities, cultural and civic activities, 17 and public places to serve residents of, and visitors to, the Immokalee Urban Area. All types of 18 residential uses are allowed within this Subdistrict, except that mobile homes are only allowed 19 as provided by IAMP Policies 6.1.6. and 6.1.9. Policy 5.1.4. and 6.1.7. Residential densities are 20 allowed as provided below, except for properties within the Lake Trafford/Cam p Keais Strand 21 System Overlay. Nonresidential uses allowed within this Subdistrict include those uses allowed 22 in the C-1 through C-4 zoning districts in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ord. No. 23 04-41, as amended. 24 25 • Base Density: Sixteen (16) dwelling units per gross acre. 26 27 • Maximum Density: Twenty (20) dwelling units per gross acre, inclusive of all density 28 bonuses. Densities above the base density can only be achieved through available 29 density bonuses. 30 31 • Transient lodging is allowed at a maximum density of thirty-two (32) units per gross acre. 32 33 • Mix of Uses: Projects equal to or greater than ten (10) acres will be encouraged to 34 provide both residential and non-residential uses. In no case shall more than 70% of the 35 C-MU Subdistrict, in aggregate, be developed as single-use, non-residential projects. 36 37 5. Recreational/Tourist Subdistrict (RT) 38 The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for recreational and tourist activities related to the 39 natural environment, and to allow for limited compact residential development. Uses allowed in 40 this Subdistrict include, but are not limited to: passive parks; nature preserves; wildlife 41 sanctuaries; open space; parks; museums; cultural facilities; marinas; transient lodging facilities 42 (including hotel/motel, rental cabins, bed and breakfast establishments, campsites); restaurants; 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 26 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted recreational vehicle parks; sporting and recreational camps; low-intensity retail directly 1 associated with the purpose of this Subdistrict; agriculture; and essential services as defined in 2 the Land Development Code. Mobile homes are allowed pursuant to the provisions of IAMP 3 Policy 6.1.6. and 6.1.9. and 6.1.7 5.1.4. 4 5 Single and multi-family dwelling units are allowed. To minimize impacts on the natural 6 environment, residential development shall be clustered subject to the following: 7 Within any project the average single family home parcel shall not exceed 6,000 square 8 feet, and in no case, shall any individual single family lot or parcel exceed 12,000 square 9 feet; and 10 Multi-family development projects shall be submitted in the form of a Planned Unit 11 Development. (Reorganized below) 12 13 • Base Density: Four (4) dwelling units per gross acre. 14 15 • Maximum Density: Four (4) dwelling units per gross acre. Density bonuses do not apply 16 in this subdistrict. 17 18 • Transient lodging is permitted at a maximum density of twenty-six (26) units per gross 19 acre. 20 21 Single and multi-family dwelling units are allowed. To minimize impacts on the natural 22 environment, residential development shall be clustered subject to the following: 23 24 • Within any project, the average size of a single family lot shall not exceed 6,000 25 square feet, and in no case shall any individual single family lot exceed 12,000 26 square feet. 27 28 DENSITY RATING 29 The Density Rating System is applicable to areas designated Urban - Mixed Use District, as 30 identified on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map. Except as provided below, the final 31 determination of permitted density via implementation of this Density Rating System is made by 32 the Board of County Commissioners through an advertised public hearing process (rezone) in 33 accordance with the LDC. Density achieved by right (as may be permitted for qualifying 34 Affordable Workforce Housing projects) shall not be combined with density achieved through 35 the rezone public hearing process. 36 37 1. THE DENSITY RATING SYSTEM IS APPLIED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: 38 a. Within the applicable Urban designated areas, the base density of the Subdistrict is 39 allowed, though not an entitlement. Density may be increased using applicable density 40 bonuses. For purposes of calculating the eligible number of dwelling units for the project, 41 the total number of dwelling units may be rounded up by one unit if the dwelling unit total 42 yields a fraction of a unit 0.5 or greater. Acreage used for the calculation of density is 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 27 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted exclusive of commercial portions of the project, except within the C-1 through C-3 1 Commercial zoning districts, and except within the Commercial Mixed-Use Subdistrict, 2 wherein residential project densities will be calculated on total gross acreage, and 3 except portions of a project for land uses having an established equivalent residential 4 density in the Collier County Land Development Code. 5 6 b. This Density Rating System only applies to residential dwelling units. This Density 7 Rating System is not applicable to accessory dwelling or accessory structures that are 8 not intended and/or not designed for permanent occupancy, nor is it applicable to 9 caretaker residences. 10 11 c. All new residential zoning located within the Urban Mixed-Use District shall be consistent 12 with the Density Rating System, except as provided for in Policy 6.1.9 5.1.6. 13 14 d. Within the applicable areas of the Urban Mixed- Use District, all properties zoned A, 15 Rural Agricultural, and/or E, Estates, and/or RSF-1, 2, 3, Residential Single Family, for 16 which an affordable workforce housing project is proposed and approved, in accordance 17 with Section 2.06.00 of the LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as amended, adopted June 22, 2004 18 and effective October 18, 2004), shall be permitted the base density of four (4) dwelling 19 units per gross acre by right, except in the case of lands designated LR on the IAMP 20 Future Land Use Map (FLUM), wherein the bonus shall not exceed 50% of the maximum 21 permitted density of the zoning district for the subject property; that is, a rezone public 22 hearing shall not be required. Such a project must comprise a minimum of ten acres. 23 Density achieved by right shall not be combined with density achieved through the 24 rezone public hearing process. The Table below illustrates the maximum “by right” 25 density based on the FLUM subdistrict and the zoning district. 26 27 Zoning District Zoned Maximum Density (per acre) Maximum Density (per acre) with “By Right” Density Bonus Outside of LR Designation Maximum Density (per acre) with “By Right” Density Within LR Designation A 0.2 4.0 0.3 E 0.46 44 4.0 0.69 66 6666666 666 RSF-1 1.0 4.0 1.5 RSF-2 2.0 4.0 3.0 RSF-3 3.0 4.0 4.0 28 29 2. DENSITY BONUSES 30 To encourage infill development, the creation of affordable-workforce housing, and 31 preferred roadway access, certain density bonuses are available. If these bonuses are utilized, 32 base densities may be exceeded. In the Low Residential Subdistrict, the base density of four 33 units per acre may only be exceeded if utilizing an affordable-workforce housing bonus. In no 34 case shall the resulting density exceed the maximum density specified in each Ssub district. 35 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 28 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted 1 a. Proximity to Commercial-Mixed Use 2 If 50% or more of a project is within the Commercial - Mixed Use Subdistrict, then the 3 base density allowed within the Commercial - Mixed Use Subdistrict of sixteen (16) 4 dwelling units per acre applies to the entire project, except that this bonus cannot be used 5 to increase density on lands within the project designated Low Residential. Buffering to 6 achieve compatibility with adjacent lower intensity uses shall be required. 7 b. Affordable-Workforce Housing Bonus, by Public Hearing 8 To encourage the provision of affordable-workforce housing within certain Subdistricts in 9 the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to eight (8) twelve (12) dwelling units per 10 gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the definition and 11 requirements of the Affordable-Workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 12 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended, adopted June 13 22, 2004, and effective October 18, 2004). This bonus may be applied to an entire 14 project or portions of a project provided that the project is located within the Commercial 15 - Mixed Use (C-MU) Subdistrict or any residential Subdistrict 16 17 c. Affordable-Workforce Housing Bonus, by Right 18 To encourage the provision of affordable-workforce housing within that portion of the 19 Urban Mixed Use District, properties zoned A, Rural Agricultural, and/or E, Estates, 20 and/or RSF-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Residential Single Family, VR, Village Residential, and/or 21 RMF-6, Residential Multi-Family-6, for which an affordable-workforce housing project is 22 proposed in accordance with the definitions and requirements of the Affordable-23 workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development 24 Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended), adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 25 2004), a maximum of four (4) residential units per gross acre shall be added to the base 26 density of four (4) dwelling units per gross acre, except in the case of lands designated 27 LR on the IAMP Future Land Use Map (FLUM), wherein the bonus shall not exceed 50% 28 of the maximum permitted density of the zoning district for the subject property. 29 Therefore, the maximum density that may be achieved by right shall not exceed eight (8) 30 dwelling units per gross acre. Such a project must comprise a minimum of ten acres. 31 Density achieved by right shall not be combined with density achieved through the 32 rezone public hearing process. The Table below illustrates the maximum “by right” 33 density based on the FLUM subdistrict and the zoning district. 34 35 Zoning District Zoned Maximum Density (per acre) Maximum Density (per acre) with “By Right” Density Bonus Outside of LR Designation Maximum Density (per acre) with “By Right” Within LR Designation A 0.2 8.0 0.3 E 0.46 44 8.0 0.69 66 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 29 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted RSF-1 1.0 8.0 1.5 RSF-2 2.0 8.0 3.0 RSF-3 3.0 8.0 4.5 RSF-4 4.0 8.0 6.0 RSF-5 5.0 8.0 7.5 RSF-6 6.0 8.0 8.0 RMF-6 6.0 8.0 8.0 VR 7.26 8.0 8.0 1 d. Residential Infill 2 1. To encourage residential infill, three (3) residential dwelling units per gross acre 3 may be added if the following criteria are met: The project is twenty (20) acres or 4 less in size; at the time of development, the project will be served by central public 5 water and sewer; at least one abutting property is developed; the project is 6 compatible with surrounding land uses; the property in question has no common 7 site development plan with adjacent property; there is no common ownership with 8 any adjacent parcels; and the parcel in question was not created to take advantage 9 of the residential infill density bonus and was created prior to the adoption of this 10 provision in the Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989. This bonus cannot 11 be used to exceed the base density in the Low Residential (LR) Subdistrict. 12 13 2. This Residential Infill bonus shall only be applicable on a one time basis and shall 14 not be expanded or continued to other adjacent properties, except for additional 15 properties not exceeding 20 acres in aggregate when added to the original 16 application of this provision and meeting all the above criteria. 17 18 e. Roadway Access 19 If the project has direct access to two (2) or more arterial or collector roads or if there is 20 a project commitment for provision of interconnection of roads accessible to the public 21 with existing or future adjacent abutting projects, one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre 22 may be added above the base density of the Subdistrict. This bonus cannot be used to 23 exceed the base density in the Low Residential (LR) Subdistrict. 24 25 3. DENSITY AND INTENSITY BLENDING 26 a. This provision is intended to encourage unified plans of development and to preserve 27 the high-quality wetlands, wildlife habitat, and other natural features that exist within 28 areas of the Immokalee Urban Area, which are proximate to Lake Trafford and Camp 29 Keais Strand. In the case of properties which are contiguous to Lake Trafford or Camp 30 Keais Strand, which straddle the Immokalee Urban Area and the Rural Lands 31 Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA) as depicted on the countywide Future Land Use Map, 32 and which were in existence and under unified control as of October 22, 2002, the 33 allowable gross density and/or intensity may be shifted from the Urban designated lands 34 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 30 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted to lands within the RLSA which are contiguous and under unified control, and which are 1 designated as a Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA) in the RLSA. The density and/or 2 intensity may be shifted on an acre per acre basis. This Density and Intensity Blending 3 provision is further subject to the following conditions and limitations: 4 5 1. The project in aggregate must be a minimum of 200 acres in size and the Urban 6 portion must be designated Recreational/Tourist Subdistrict (RT) or Low Residential 7 sSubdistrict (LR) in the Immokalee Area Master Plan; 8 9 2. It must be demonstrated the lands designated Urban have a high natural resource 10 value as indicated by the presence of Group 1 or Group 2 FLUCCS Codes and a 11 score of greater than 1.2 (both as identified on the Stewardship Credit Worksheet in 12 the RLSA); 13 14 3. Density and intensity may only be shifted from lands within the Immokalee Urban 15 Area containing this high natural resource value (as measured above) to the lands 16 within a contiguous SRA, on an acre per acre basis, providing such lands were 17 under unified control as of October 22, 2002; and 18 19 4. Lands within the Urban area, from which the density and/or intensity has been 20 shifted, shall be placed in a conservation easement in perpetuity. 21 b. For properties containing two or more Future Land Use Subdistricts, the overall density 22 and/or intensity that could be achieved in aggregate, may be distributed throughout the 23 project, provided the total allowable density and/or intensity is not exceeded, and further 24 subject to the following: 25 26 1. The project furthers the protection, enhancement or restoration of wetlands, listed 27 species habitat, or other natural features;, 28 29 2. The project is consistent with, and furthers the applicable objectives of, the 30 Immokalee Area Master Plan and is compatible with surrounding properties and 31 environment;, 32 33 3. The project is approved as a Planned Unit Development; and 34 35 4. The project mitigates for any negative impacts on adjacent properties through 36 appropriate measures, such as buffering, separation, or other land design 37 techniques, adequate to lessen these effects. 38 39 B. URBAN—INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 40 The purpose of this District is to function as a major employment center and is intended to 41 accommodate industrial, distribution, trade, agriculture, and manufacturing uses;, essential 42 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 31 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted services;, as well as office and commercial uses as limited within each Subdistrict. 1 Nonresidential uses are subject to the intensity limitations in Policy 6.1.10 2 3 1. Industrial Subdistrict (IN) 4 The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for industrial, distribution, trade and 5 manufacturing uses. Allowed uses include a variety of industrial, limited commercial, and 6 associated uses, including: manufacturing; processing; storage and warehousing; 7 wholesaling; distribution; packing houses; recycling; high technology industries; 8 laboratories; assembly; storage; computer and data processing; and commercial uses 9 services intended to serve the needs of employees and visitors, such as daycare centers, 10 restaurants, and convenience stores. Accessory uses, and structures customarily 11 associated with these principal uses include ancillary offices and retail sales. 12 13 2. Industrial – Mixed Use Subdistrict (I-MU) 14 The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide a transition area from the Industrial Subdistrict 15 to adjacent commercial and residential land uses. The Immokalee State Farmers Market 16 and related facilities are located in this Subdistrict. This Subdistrict allows for: higher 17 intensity commercial uses as described in the LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as amended) for 18 Commercial (C-4 and C-5), and Research and Technology Parks PUD, and Business Park 19 Districts, subject to development standards set forth in the LDC. This Subdistrict also 20 allows for light manufacturing, processing, and packaging in fully enclosed buildings; 21 research, design and product development; printing, lithography and publishing; and 22 similar industrial uses.; This Subdistrict also allows for agriculture uses and agricultural-23 related uses, such as packing houses; warehousing; and targeted industries. Targeted 24 industries include distribution; medical laboratories, research, and rehabilitative centers; 25 high technology; computer software, services, and processing, and similar uses. 26 27 Within certain IMU designated lands denoted on the IAMP Future Land Use Map, 28 commercial uses are permitted on up to 30% of the total IMU acreage. The percentage and 29 mix of each category of use shall be determined at the time of rezoning in accordance with 30 the criteria specified in the Land Development Code. The acreage and building square 31 footage figures and percentages shall be included in the PUD ordinance or rezone 32 ordinance so as to demonstrate compliance with this requirement. (Moved to Overlays 33 and Features I-MU Commercial Overlay) 34 35 To ensure compatibility and ameliorate impacts on adjacent residentially zoned properties 36 (including A-Rural Agricultural or E-Estates zoned properties), a minimum 75- foot building 37 setback within which a minimum 20-foot wide vegetated landscape buffer shall be provided. 38 This vegetated buffer shall be located adjacent to the property line and shall contain, at a 39 minimum, two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, 40 and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a 41 minimum of three feet height within one year. Existing native trees must be retained within 42 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 32 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted this 20-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native 1 vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. 2 Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, 3 and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an 4 external outfall. For properties adjacent to residentially zoned property, including properties 5 zoned Agriculture (A) and Estates (E), the required 75-foot setback may be reduced to 50 6 feet if a minimum 6-foot tall decorative wall or fence providing at least 80 percent opacity is 7 installed within the reduced setback, and providing that the required 20-foot wide landscape 8 buffer and all required vegetation is located between the wall and residential zoned 9 properties. (Moved to Overlays and Features I-MU Commercial Overlay) 10 11 Certain residential, mobile home and migrant transient housing uses are permitted on 12 properties located at 1101, 1121, and 1123 Alachua Street, Immokalee, Florida, in 13 accordance with the Mediated Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release relating to Case 14 No. 08-9355-CA and Case No. 09-1281-CA, dated February 26, 2013 (See OR Book 4895, 15 Page 1963 et seq. of the Official Public Records of Collier County, Florida). The Agreement 16 references both the Commerce Center-Mixed Use Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed-Use 17 District and the Commerce Center-Industrial Subdistrict of the Urban-Industrial District of 18 the IAMP in effect on February 26, 2013. 19 20 3. Industrial – Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict 21 The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow the Collier County Airport Authority (CCAA) and 22 leaseholders to develop the Immokalee Regional Airport and surrounding lands for the 23 economic health and development of the greater Immokalee area and Collier County as a 24 whole. Because the CCAA needs to retain flexibility to provide various general aviation and 25 revenue-generating opportunities via land leases as the Airport grows and changes over 26 time, a broad range of uses shall be allowed in this Subdistrict. In addition to all uses 27 permitted in the Industrial Subdistrict, allowable uses include: airport facility and related 28 accessory uses; commercial, industrial, institutional and agricultural uses; freight and 29 warehousing; trade; and ancillary recreational, vehicular racing, communications and 30 essential service uses. 31 32 C. OVERLAYS AND FEATURES 33 1. Wetlands Connected to Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay 34 The Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP, Policy 6.2.4(4), 35 identifies possible high-quality wetland systems connected to the Lake Trafford/Camp 36 Keais Strand system within the Immokalee Urban Area. These wetlands require greater 37 protection measures than wetlands located in other portions of the Immokalee Urban 38 Designated Area., and therefore the wetland protection standards set forth in Policy 39 6.2.5 of the CCME will be revised as part of the next available Growth Management 40 Amendment cycle to provide appropriate native vegetation standards for the LT/CKSSO 41 based upon additional ecological data and analysis. These wetlands are identified on 42 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 33 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted the Immokalee Future Land Use Map by the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System 1 Overlay (LT/CKSSO). 2 3 The Density and Intensity Blending provisions of this Master Plan may be utilized for 4 lands within this LT/CKSSO. The maximum allowable gross density for lands within the 5 LT/CKSSO is the base density established for the applicable Subdistrict. Lands within 6 the LT/CKSSO are not eligible for any density bonuses, including by right. Essential 7 Services shall be limited to: those necessary to ensure public safety; and, those 8 necessary to serve permitted uses, such as private wells and septic tanks, utility lines, lift 9 stations, and water pumping stations. 10 11 The additional wetland protection measures do not apply to properties within the 12 LT/CKSSO that have been legally cleared of native vegetation as of the adoption of this 13 Master Plan, but do apply to all new development and redevelopment pursuant to the 14 applicable nonconforming provisions set forth in the LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as 15 amended). 16 17 If development on the Seminole Reservation functionally severs the connectivity of the 18 wetland system for properties within the LT/CKSSO, east of the Reservation, the 19 additional wetland protection measures will not be applied to those severed eastern 20 wetlands. The standard measures for wetlands in Urban designated lands shall be 21 applied, as described in the CCME, to those severed eastern wetlands. 22 23 2. Seminole Reservation (SR) Feature 24 The Seminole Reservation within Immokalee comprises approximately 600 acres of 25 largely undeveloped land owned by the Seminole Tribal Council and located on the east 26 side of First Street, South of (SR 29). The Seminole Reservation is not controlled or 27 regulated by the Collier County Growth Management Plan or LDC (Ordinance 04-41, as 28 amended) and is identified on the Future Land Use Map for illustrative purposes only. 29 30 3. Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area Feature 31 In order for local governments to designate a geographic area within its jurisdiction as an 32 Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area pursuant to Section 163.2517 (4), Florida Statutes, 33 it must amend its comprehensive land use plan to delineate the boundaries within the 34 Future Land Use Element. The Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area is consistent with 35 criteria outlined in Section 163.2514(2) (a)-(e), Florida Statutes. The intent of this 36 delineation is to comprehensively address the urban problems within the area consistent 37 with the goals of this plan. The Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area was adopted by 38 Ordinance 2000-66 and the Urban Infill and Redevelopment Plan was adopted by 39 Ordinance 2000-71. 40 41 4. Industrial – Mixed Use Commercial Overlay 42 The Industrial - Mixed Use Commercial Overlay is depicted on the IAMP Future Lands 43 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 34 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted Use Map and comprises approximately 363 acres. This Overlay allows the uses of the 1 underlying Industrial - Mixed Use Subdistrict except that commercial uses - those 2 permitted in the C-4 and C-5 zoning districts in the Land Development Code, Ordinance 3 No. 04-41, as amended - are limited to a maximum of thirty percent (30%) of the Overlay 4 land area (approximately 109 acres). To implement this Overlay, Collier County shall 5 initiate a Land Development Code amendment within two years of adoption. 6 7 To ensure compatibility and ameliorate impacts on For lands in this Overlay that are 8 adjacent to residentially or agriculturally zoned properties (including A-Rural Agricultural 9 or E-Estates zoned properties), a minimum 75-foot building setback, which includes a 10 minimum 20-foot wide vegetated landscape buffer, shall be provided. This vegetated 11 buffer shall be located adjacent to the property line and shall contain, at a minimum, two 12 staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a 13 double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a 14 minimum of three feet in height within one year. Existing native trees must be retained 15 within this 20-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other 16 existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this 17 buffer requirement. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if 18 left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if 19 necessary to reach an external outfall. For properties adjacent to residentially zoned 20 property, including properties zoned Agriculture (A) and Estates (E), the The required 21 75-foot setback may be reduced to 50 feet if a minimum 6-foot tall decorative wall or 22 fence providing at least 80 percent opacity is installed within the reduced setback, and if 23 providing that the required 20-foot wide landscape buffer and all required vegetation is 24 located between the wall or fence and the adjacent residentially and/or agriculturally 25 zoned properties. 26 27 28 Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) HR HR I-MU LR LR CMU LR LR APO I-MU C M U LR IN LR I-MU HRSR CMU MR HR RT MR HR MR HR HR HR CMU MR MR CMU MR CMU CMU CR 846 SR 29SR 29 NS 1ST STN 15TH STLAKE TRAFFORD RD IMMOKALEE RDNEW MARKET RD W W MAIN ST E MAIN ST NEW MARKET RD E 0 0.5 1 1.50.25 Miles GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICPGROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT E IMMOKALEE FUTURE LAND USE MAPPROPOSED FLUM MAP LAKETRAFFORD Legend OVERL AYS AND SPEC IAL FEAT URES URBAN DESIGNATIO NIMMOKALEE F UTU RE L AND USE Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay SR - Seminole Reservation Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area I-MU Commercial Overlay URBA N M IX ED USE DISTRICT URBA N IND USTRIAL D IST RIC T RT - Recreation Tourist Subdistrict LR - Low Residential Subdistrict MR - Medium Residential Subdistrict HR - High Residential Subdistrict CMU - Commercial Mixed Use subdistrict I-MU - Industrial Mixed Use Subdistrict APO - Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict IN - Industrial Subdistrict Immokalee Urban Area Boundary Collier County Arterial and Collector Roads Collier County Local Roads Attachment 'A"9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: S.R. Attachment 'A' Proposed IAMP (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 1ST ST SLAKE TRAFFORD RD15TH ST NWESTCLOX STNEW MARKET RD MAIN STSR 29CR 846SR 29 N171546392286735113612112630253129281236173516151427132532333410132618141821193024312223202423193232434202152719822231924101522293217202220IAMP FLUM - EXISTING VS. PROPOSEDIAMP FLUM - EXISTING VS. PROPOSED0 0.5 1 1.5 20.25MilesGIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICPGIS/OPERATIONS DEPARTMENTFILE: F:/GIS/DATAREQUEST/IAMP/IMMOKALEEFLUECHANGE.MXDLAKETRAFFORDNOTE: MAP IS A REPRESENTATION ONLY AND CANNOT BEINTERPRETED WITHOUT THE OFFICIAL FLUM AND GMP.qPROPOSEDLAKE TRAFFORD/CAMP KEAIS STRANDWETLANDS SYSTEMCOMMERCIAL MIXED USE SUBDISTRICTINDUSTRIAL MIXED USE SUBDISTRICTLOW RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICTMIXED RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICTHIGH RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICTINDUSTRIAL SUBDISTRICTRECREATIONAL TOURIST SUBDISTRICTSEMINOLE RESERVATIONEXISTINGLAKE TRAFFORD/CAMP KEAIS STRANDWETLANDS SYSTEMLOW RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICTMIXED RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICTHIGH RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICTNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SUBDISTRICTCOMMERCE CENTER - MIXED USE SUBDISTRICTRECREATIONAL TOURIST SUBDISTRICTCOMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICTINDUSTRIAL SUBDISTRICTCOMMERCE CENTER - INDUSTRIAL SUBDISTRICTSEMINOLE INDIAN RESERVATION9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 49Attachment: Map 1 IAMP FLUM Existing vs Proposed (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper Prepared by the Growth Management Department, Community Planning Section Staff May 2018 Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 1 Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Table of Contents Page Section 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………2 Section 2: Background…………………………………………………………..……………………………..3 Section 3: Public Outreach, Data and Analysis……………………………………..……………….7 Section 4: List of Initial Recommendations……………………………………………….…………16 Appendix A: Public Outreach………………………………………………………………………..…….17 Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 2 Section 1: Introduction This White Paper provides a conceptual framework to address elements of the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) restudy. The IAMP is a separate element within the County’s Comprehensive Plan. This framework serves as a vehicle to further vet and inform staff , community leaders and the public in advance of the specific language that will be incorporated into the transmittal documents for Growth Management Plan amendment, and the public hearing process. The IAMP is the third of four restudies focused on eastern Collier County, as directed by the Board of County Commissioners (Board) on February 10, 2015. Focus areas of all four restudies include complementary land uses and economic vitality, including housing affordability, transportation and mobility, and environmental stewardship. The Community Planning staff in the Zoning Division of the Growth Management Department provide this document to describe the history and status the IAMP (Section 2), the planning process, outreach, data and analysis (Section 3) and the list of Initial recommendations (Section 4). Appendix A includes the full documentation of the public outreach process and results. The basic structure of the current IAMP is divided into two main parts: The Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs) section and the Land Use Designation Description section. The former section sets forth vision, values, requirements and aspirations; the latter describes specific subdistricts and their land uses within the IAMP. Both sections guide the Code of Ordinances and Land Development Code in enactment and updated amendments. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 3 Section 2: Background History of the Immokalee Area Master Plan When Collier County was formed in 1923, the only non-coastal settlement in Collier County was located in the Immokalee and Corkscrew areas. Today, Immokalee is the only community of considerable size in interior Collier County. Immokalee was first settled by the Seminole Indians, who used the land as a camping and resting place. Hunters, cattlemen, and India n traders were the next inhabitants of Immokalee. They found their way to Immokalee around the middle of the 19 th century. No permanent settlers appeared in Immokalee until 1872. Immokalee has been known by several different names, changing with its varied settlers. The Seminoles gave Immokalee the name ―Gopher Ridge because of the unusual number of land turtles and gophers in the area. Immokalee was also known at one time as ―Allen Place after William Allen, one of the first settlers. The Community received its current name, Immokalee, meaning my home, in October 1897 with the naming of the first post office. The name was suggested by Bishop William Crane Gray, who argued that the name should be a Seminole word with pleasant associations. The population in Immokalee continued to grow, and the first school and church opened not long after the establishment of the post office. Immokalee possessed all the elements of a flourishing community, but was relatively isolated until 1921, when the Atlantic Coast Line Railway Company (ACL) expanded its lines south from LaBelle and broke the isolation. Before the railroad was extended to Immokalee, trips were made by waterway or by sand trails, which were terrible for traveling during the wet season. When Collier County was created in 1923, the transportation situation for the 74 citizens of Immokalee did not immediately improve. In fact, in order to reach the County seat at Everglades (now known as Everglades City), the residents of Immokalee had to first g o to the County seat of Lee County, Fort Myers, and then by boat to Everglades City, or they could drive south along poor road conditions to Marco Island and continue from Caxambas by boat. Barron Collier and his associates were aware of the importance of opening a direct route from Immokalee to Everglades City. They made a strenuous effort to open a North -South road and to induce the ACL to extend its lines to Everglades City. Efforts continued for the building of a roadway into Immokalee, but the transportation problem was not resolved until Immokalee Road (CR -846) was rebuilt and resurfaced a second time in 1955-56. With such a major improvement in the transportation system, Immokalee became a thriving center for ranching, farming, and lumbering. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 4 The Immokalee community, with the improvements in transportation and its increasing popularity as an agricultural community, began to witness an influx of residents to the area. With such growth came the need for regulations to manage the activities occurr ing in the area. The Board of County Commissioners established an Immokalee Area Planning Commission (IAMPC) in October of 1965. The Community had its own Zoning and Subdivision Regulations, separate from the coastal area of Collier County. The Immokalee Area was governed under its own Zoning Ordinance until January 1982, when a unified Zoning Ordinance was adopted for the entire unincorporated Collier County. The duties of the IAMPC continued until September 1985 when the Collier Planning Commission was established with representatives from all areas within Collier County. Today, there is one representatives from County Commission District 5, which includes Immokalee, however the District 5 representative is from Golden Gate Estates, so there is not a representative from Immokalee serving on the Collier County Planning Commission. History of Planning Efforts in Immokalee Immokalee has long been recognized as a distinct community within Collier County due to its unique geographic, social, and economic characteristics. This distinction led to the establishment of the Immokalee Area Planning Commission in 1965 and separate zoning and subdivision regulations, which were in effect through 1982. While Immokalee is now regulated through the county -wide Land Development Code, Collier County reaffirmed the distinctive nature of Immokalee by designating it as a distinct Planning Community in the 1983 Comprehensive Plan. In 1989, Collier County adopted revisions to the comprehensive plan, and recommended that an area master plan for Immokalee be developed. This was completed in 1991 with the establishment of the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) as a separate element of the GMP. The IAMP supplements the county-wide goals, objectives, and policies of the Collier County GMP by providing Immokalee-specific provisions. On March 14, 2000, the Collier County Commission made a finding of conditions of blight for Immokalee through Resolution 2000-82, allowing for the establishment of the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). The purpose of the CRA is not to create policy, as found within the GMP and IAMP, but rather to encourage economic and social improvement in the urban areas of Immokalee. To accomplish this, the CRA prepared the 2000 Immokalee Community Redevelopment Plan, which addresses the unique needs and overall goals for redevelopment of Immokalee, and identifies the types of projects planned for the area. By statute, the Redevelopment Plan is required to conform to the GMP. The Board of County Commissioners found it necessary to restudy the Immokalee Urban Designated Area after designating the CRA. On May 27, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution 2003-192, thereby establishing the Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Committee as an ad hoc advisory committee to the Board. On September 28, 2004, the Board adopted Ordinance 2004-62, extending the timeframe for the advisory committee and renaming it the Immokalee Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 5 Master Plan and Visioning Committee (IMPVC). Over a six-year period, the IMPVC and consultant conducted extensive public outreach, collected and analyzed data, drafted recommended amendments to the IAMP, and proceeded through the Growth Management Plan amendment hearing process, with an additional step of a community referendum to measu re support. Despite this extensive effort, and a favorable referendum result, the proposed amendments did not achieve the necessary super majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners for adoption. The current IAMP restudy has refocused the Immokalee community on the extensive time and effort spent on the previous IMPVC work. Staff has engaged the Immokalee CRA advisory board, the MSTU advisory board, the Immokalee Chamber of Commerce, all Collier County Departments, and Immokalee residents and business owners, to review and update the proposed IAMP. Current Conditions The Immokalee urban boundary encompasses approximately 17,092 acres. As of 2017, most of this acreage, approximately 10,000 acres, remains vacant or in agriculture production , as shown on Figure 1. Figure 1. Immokalee Vacant and Developed Properties Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 6 The population projection for 2017 was approximately 25,000 persons and through 2030 the permanent population estimate is expected to grow to just over 26,000 persons. Immokalee has a unique demographic; different than what is typically found in Collier County. According to census data, the median age of its residents is 28, compared to 47 county-wide. The majority (75.6%) of the Immokalee population is Hispanic. In Immokalee, the median worker income is approximately $16,000, well below the County median of $66,000. Typical work commute times differ, 51% of work commutes are under 25 minutes, 18.2% commute 25 -45 minutes, and 30.8% have a commute greater than 45 minutes. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 7 Section 3: Public Outreach, Data and Analysis The Immokalee restudy public participation process included extensive engagement through meetings at the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board, Immokalee MSTU Advisory Board, Immokalee Chamber of Commerce and six advertised public workshops. Public workshops were announced and advertised in English, Creole and Spanish. Appendix A includes the public workshop summaries. The public workshops kicked-off with a visioning process. The intent was to clarify the community values and to ensure the IAMP reflects and addresses these values. The community- defined vision statement should provide guidance for implementing planning goals, objectives and policies. The vision statement established by Immokalee residents and business owners is: “Immokalee is a family-oriented community that supports a healthy lifestyle. It is attractive, environmentally sustainable and offers a full range of housing, recreation and education opportunities to meet all residents’ needs. Immokalee has a safe, well-connected network to walk and bicycle about town, as well as a roadway network needed to support the transport of goods and services. Business and job opportunities flourish in trade and distribution, agri -business, and ecotourism.” This vision statement reflects the need for the County to adopt land use and transportation policies that supports a healthy, family environment, a multi-modal transportation network, and economic development and redevelopment. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 8 Land Use and Economic Vitality Within currently adopted Immokalee Area Master Plan there are numerous future land use designations ranging from low density residential use to industrial use. The previous restudy effort simplified land use designations with focus on combining multiple commercial designations into one Commercial-Mixed Use designation. In addition, the Industrial land use designations were modified to more accurately delineate the locations of the airport, i ndustrial, and industrial mixed-use designation. The majority of the residential designations remain the same with the exception of the “mixed residential” changing to “medium residential.” Some boundaries of these designation were modified to better address compatibility between residential densities and abutting commercial designations. In support of the community’s desire to promote eco-tourism, the Recreational Tourist land use designation at the north end of Lake Trafford was expanded farther south, abutting the lake. The densities associated with each residential land use are adequate and no further changes to density are proposed. A comparison of the land use designation changes is found in Table 1. These changes are visually represented on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map (Figure 2) and the Proposed Immokalee Future Land Use Map (Figure 3). Table 1 – Immokalee Land Use Designation Comparison Existing FLUM Designations Proposed FLUM Designations URBAN-MIXED USE DISTRICT URBAN-MIXED USE DISTRICT LR Low Residential LR Low Residential MR Mixed Residential MR Medium Residential HR High Residential HR High Residential NC Neighborhood Center Eliminated CC-MU Commerce Center-Mixed-Use Eliminated PUD Planned Unit Development Commercial Eliminated RT Recreational Tourist RT Recreational/Tourist CMU Commercial-Mixed Use URBAN-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Eliminated C Commercial – SR 29 and Jefferson Ave. Eliminated URBAN - INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT URBAN - INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ID Industrial IN Industrial CC-I Commerce Center - Industrial IMU Industrial Mixed Use BP Business Park Eliminated APO Immokalee Regional Airport The proposed changes supporting commercial, industrial and tourism land uses, are consistent with the community’s vision to support economic growth. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9 Figure 2. Current Adopted Immokalee FLUM Figure 3. Proposed Immokalee FLUM Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 10 In further review of the previous restudy language it was found that many of the GOPs focus solely on housing. While housing is an important factor in any Master Plan, housing can be viewed as one component of the broader view of the neighborhood. During the beginning of the public outreach for this restudy, it became clear the Immokalee community has a desire to think beyond the conditions of Immokalee housing and to begin by identifying neighborhoods, and work towards planning for complete neighborhoods. To this end, the Immokalee community has drafted Figure 4 the Immokalee Neighborhood Map. Figure 4. Draft Immokalee Neighborhoods Map The intent of identifying neighborhoods and preparing p olicies for neighborhoods is in part to implement a portion of the Immokalee vision statement that focuses on Immokalee as “a healthy, family-oriented community.” With policies focusing on the neighborhood, an evaluation of each neighborhood can determine needs, such as places for families to play within their neighborhood, sidewalks, lighting, stormwater management and waste management. Once needs are determined, projects can be evaluated to determine if multiple neighborhood objectives, such as Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 11 co-locating a sidewalk with a stormwater management project, can be efficiently and effectively achieved. Land Use Policies Recommendations The land use goals, objectives and policies (GOPs) derived during the previous restudy were reviewed and compared to the currently adopted policies. Staff and the Immokalee community found the intent of the GOPs were very similar, but the previous restudy effort simplified and made the language more concise. This more concise language is preferred. • Re-designation of the lands within the boundary of the Immokalee Regional Airport from Industrial (ID) to Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict (APO). • Revisions to the land use designations in the IAMP FLUM include: o An increase of +200 acres of Recreational Tourist (RT) designated lands. o A five percent reduction of residential designated lands. This change of over +636 acres of residential designated lands are proposed to be re-designated to allow commercial and industrial development, as well as uses that are allowed under the RT designation. o An increase of +462 acres of industrial designated lands. This increase includes the re- designation from Industrial (I) to Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict (APO) of 1,381 acres of land that is part of the Immokalee Regional Airport within the Immokalee urban boundary. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 12 Transportation and Mobility Immokalee is historically an agriculutre town with need to support freight traffic. Challenges have occurred where large trucks and pedestrian traffic is heavy, and using the same corridors, particularly along Main Street. Immokalee has a fairly, well-connected roadway network as can be seen on the Figure 5 aerial view. However, there are some local street interconnections needed to better enhance transit service and pedestrian and bicycle access. Figure 5. Immokalee’s Roadway Network Aerial View Figure 6, the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Needs Assessment identifies several needed roadway improvements along major corridors such as SR 29, SR 82 and the planned “by -pass corridor” which is intended to provide freight traffic an alternate route off Main Street. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 13 Figure 6. 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Needs Assessment Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 14 Figure 7. TIGER Grant Project Area Map Additionally, recognizing the transportation needs of pedestrians, the Collier MPO Walkable Community Study to assess and prioritize pedestrian facility needs This study helped to provide support for a TIGER grant application for infrastructure improvement around New Market Road. Collier County was successful in the grant application as was awarded $17 million for the improvements shown in Figure 7. Transportation Policies Recommendations • Support all transportation needs within Immokalee with an emphasis on freight movement and walkability. Walkability will be improved through the ongoing implementation of the recommendations of the MPO’s Walkability Study. • Plan for new collector roads and interconnecting local streets to enhance transit, walking and cycling. • Coordinate with FDOT on state roadway projects. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 15 Environmental Stewardship Within the Immokalee there is a significant wetland system connected to Lake Trafford and Camp Keais Strand system. The primary concern for potential environmental degradation in Immokalee is associated with the water quality as discharged into this wetland system and ultimately Lake Trafford. The proposed Future Land Use Map updates the wetland delineation, referred to Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overly (LT/CKSSO). The revised area encompasses approximately 1,492 acres. This wetland system can easily be identified running east of Lake Trafford, and south of the developed urban as shown in Figure 8. The proposed IAMP address the protection of natural resources through specific development standards and incentives. Figure 8. Immokalee Wetland System Environmental Policies Recommendations Recommended Policy • Re-configuration of the wetland boundary that connects to Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay. • Incentivize the movement of development rights from the wetland system. • Amend the Land Development Code to establish best management practices to minimize adverse impacts to Lake Trafford. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 16 Section 4: List of Initial Recommendations Land Use Policies Recommendations • Re-designation of the lands within the boundary of the Immokalee Regional Airport from Industrial (ID) to Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict (APO). • Revisions to the land use designations in the IAMP FLUM include: o An increase of +200 acres of Recreational Tourist (RT) designated lands. o A five percent reduction of residential designated lands. This change of over +636 acres of residential designated lands are proposed to be re-designated to allow commercial and industrial development, as well as uses that are allowed under the RT designation. o An increase of +462 acres of industrial designated lands. This increase includes the re- designation from Industrial (I) to Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict (APO) of 1,381 acres of land that is part of the Immokalee Regional Airport within the Immokalee urban boundary. Transportation Policies Recommendations • Support all transportation needs within Immokalee with an emphasis on freight movement and walkability. Walkability will be improved through the ongoing implementation of the recommendations of the MPO’s Walkability Study. • Plan for new collector roads and interconnecting local streets to enhance transit, walking and cycling. • Coordinate with FDOT on state roadway projects. Environmental Policies Recommendations • Re-configuration of the wetland boundary that connects to Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay. • Incentivize the movement of development rights from the wetland system. • Amend the Land Development Code to establish best management practices to minimize adverse impacts to Lake Trafford. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 17 Appendix A Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Public Outreach Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 18 Introduction The Immokalee Area Master Plan (GGAMP) public outreach process included extensive public engagement. Residents and stakeholders were encouraged to provide input through multiple platforms including meetings with the Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board, MSTU advisory board, Chamber of Commerce and six public workshops. The public workshops began with the establishment of the community’s vision statement. Staff obtained an outdate draft vision statement and presented it to the community for their evaluation and suggested edits. Following several iterations, the community embraced the following vision. Immokalee Vision Statement “Immokalee is a family-oriented community that supports a healthy lifestyle. It is attractive, environmentally sustainable and offers a full range of housing, recreation and education opportunities to meet all residents’ needs. Immokalee has a safe, well-connected network to walk and bicycle about town, as well as a roadway network needed to support the transport of goods and services. Business and job opportunities flourish in trade and distribution, agri -business, and ecotourism.” Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 19 Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Public Workshop #1 Summary February 15th, 2018 – CareerSource 750 South 5th St. (8:30 a.m. –10:30 a.m.) The first public workshop for the Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy was held on February 15th, 2018 at CareerSource. The meeting began approximately 8:45 a.m. The majority of the attendees were Collier County and Immokalee CRA officials and staff. Three members of the public attended. Anita Jenkins, Collier County Principal Planner gave a brief history of the development of Immokalee and described the previous attempts of collecting data and applying master plan changes from 2003 to 2012. She asked audience members about the previous planning process, and one audience member noted that the previous members of the County Commission were not on the same page as the residents. She discussed the existing and proposed master plan goals that will be the subject of a roundtable discussion. She then described the next steps of the Restudy process. Lastly, she explained the Rural Land Stewardship Area (RLSA) Restudy and Kris Van Lengen, Community Planning Manager at Collier County, invited anyone interested to be involved. An Immokalee resident raised a concern about this master plan process working simultaneously with ongoing transportation planning, airport master planning, and parks and recreation master plans. Another resident reiterated that there is a concern over a lack of coordination and communication between these different master plans. This concern led to a discussion of the new “loop road” which is outside of the scope of the future land use map beyond ensuring that the policies written do not forbid its creation, such as restricting four lane roads. Anita then focused on the vision statement, master plan goals, and various maps to discuss future land use and neighborhoods for roundtable discussion. The vision statement was derived from a previous CRA vision, and the audience agreed to include the term “family-oriented.” Residents also discussed the priority of making the community more walkable because it’s a necessity. This lead to a conversation of the general consensus on a need for a civic center or some type of public use facility. Anita then discussed proposed goals, referring to handouts. Residents commented on affordable housing. They said Habitat for Humanity homes are not options for workforce or moderate income level housing, therefore there needs to be more workforce housing and a variety of housing stock. There was discussion about the limited amount of land in Immokalee for development of housing, other than that land which is owned by a few large companies. Residents emphasized the need to have coordination with these companies, urging their presence at these workshops. Anita provided guidance about potential incentive-driven policies. Anita also asked that if anyone would require additional data and analysis for pursuing grants to please provide this feedback along with policy suggestions. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 20 Despite sitting in a small group, subgroups broke out to discuss the maps depicting Future Land Use, aerial views and sidewalks. There was agreement to create a sidewalk master plan that includes sidewalks on all roads in Immokalee and a priority list for implementation. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 21 Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Public Workshop #2 Summary February 15, 2018 – Revelation Church (5:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m.) The second public input meeting for the Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy was held on February 15, 2018 at Revelation Church. The meeting began at approximately 5:30 p.m. Ten people attended the meeting, four were County officials and staff and six were members of the public. See attached for sign in sheet. Anita Jenkins, Principal Planner with Collier County Growth Management Department, began the evening with a presentation summarizing the Immokalee Master Plan background and purpose. Anita summarized portions of existing uses and future land use and zoning. Anita emphasized the intent of the Master Plan is a top-level view of land use designations that directs goals and visions. Additionally, she emphasized that zoning controls development standards, setbacks, etc. She highlighted the meeting schedule for the next public meetings and outlined the next steps for having the Master Plan transmitted and adopted. Anita started discussion by asking the audience “What happened in the 2008-2012 Master Plan Update study that you wanted, but didn’t happen?” Feedback and several concerns were provided regarding infrastructure, housing, funding and natural resource protection as summarized below. Infrastructure • Need for improved roadways • Immokalee needs a hospital and/or urgent care Housing • Inability to easily move, upgrade or replace mobile homes due to current development standards in the Land Development Code (LDC) • Ability to support density blending Funding • Concern for losing funding in the future • Desire to capture funding for Immokalee specifically versus the majority of funding directed towards Ave Maria Natural Resources Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 22 • Allow density blending to encourage protection of natural resources, specifically the slough and other wetlands • TDR programs are too expensive to buy/manage credits Other Comments • Show surrounding land uses on the Master Plan Map, including RSLA lands • Restrictive and overly detailed language in the Growth Management Plan is more appropriate for the LDC The next portion of the meeting was focused on revising the Immokalee Draft Vision Statement. An audience member asked, “What does Immokalee stand for?” and the audience responded, “My Home.” It was suggested to somehow include “My Home” in the vision statement. Other comments related to vision statement revisions included shortening the vision statement, replacing agri- tourisim and ecotourism with just tourism, and a preference to keep ecotourism separate to reflect the amount of farms and ranches in Immokalee. The terms affordable and workforce housing project a negative connotation. The audience did acknowledge the need and current land use for affordable and workforce housing, but also desire moderate and luxury housing. The audience proposed several solutions including attention to affordable housing, diversified housing, or housing accessible to all. While discussing housing visions, it was mentioned that Hendry County has no impact fees. It was suggested to create policy and incentives for developers to bring specific (higher end) housing and businesses to Immokalee. Several audience members commented throughout the workshop about expanding the airport area to bring more business and inquired on how to collect funding opportunities from potential airport growth or expansion. The audience expressed concern that Immokalee wants to be a part of the County, but they are different. The difficulties stem from wanting a fair share of funding, being subject to County policies and standards, and wanting to maintain the current commu nity culture. The conversation then shifted to the community strengths which includes a vibrant main street with appealing restaurants. However, it was acknowledged owners of older properties are resistant to change, improvement or demolition of their structures. The conversation shifted towards the less favorable conditions of many homes and abandoned businesses. Community education to encourage home improvement was suggested. Anita refocused the group to discuss the currently adopted and proposed goals. The group agreed that the proposed goals were preferred to the adopted goals and chose to discuss only the proposed goals going forward. Adopted GOAL 1 (proposed GOAL 6) was moved to be and objective so was not discussed. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 23 Adopted GOAL 2 (proposed GOAL 3) was discussed first. It was suggested that the term sanitary be removed. Everyone wants sanitary housing and using the term in a goal suggests that current standards are not sanitary which subsequently discourages businesses to locate to Immokalee. The Slough, Lake Trafford and other named natural resources should be specifically identified in proposed GOAL 5 (adopted GOAL 3) or in the associated policies. A heavy emphasis was then placed on the need for parks and public facilities. Some of the audience felt strongly about Immokalee’s park deficiency and lack of sidewalks, bike paths, wide roads, or transit for kids to access the limited park locations. Other audience members disagreed with the lack of public parks. Discussion continued on the parks topic including Immokalee’s award-winning soccer team, lack of public facilities at soccer fields, kids playing half field due to lack of parks, and the inability to host tournaments due to lack of public restrooms at the fields. Adopted GOAL 6 (proposed GOAL 2) focused on the economy. The group again expressed desire to improve the airport and collect funding from the airport. Proposed GOAL 1, GOAL 7 and GOAL 8 were widely accepted among the group. The group was in favor of continuing to implement the Immokalee Community Plan. One audience member suggested a policy for safer routes in and out of Immokalee. Another audience member suggested proposed GOAL 1 to “Annually Identify the priorities of the Immokalee Community and the Immokalee portion of the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency.” The group revisited the Vision Statement. It was suggested and agreed to revise the “outstanding schools” portion. The group said this was not a realistic goal and suggested to revise to “promote outstanding education” which would broaden the goal to include information technology and other workforce training institutions. One final comment suggested addressing agri-research as a policy under the appropriate goal. Anita then directed the group to identify existing known neighborhoods on the aerial maps provided. Circles were provided as a quarter-mile reference. The team wanted to know why identifying neighborhoods was important. Anita and the group collectively answered this question by saying it was important to determine which areas needed parks and/or infrastructure and to spread the wealth when new projects or budgets arise. The team did not identify any new neighborhoods, but Anita did point out neighborhoods identified in the morning workshop an d the group did recognize those neighborhoods as distinct areas. The Sidewalks Map was then reviewed. The group unanimously agreed that Immokalee needs more sidewalks, specifically on paths near and to schools, generally everywhere for bicycles, and requested a sidewalk/bike connection to Ave Maria. The audience expressed concerns including narrow roads, poor or no lighting, and beaten dirt paths that indicate a need for sidewalks. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 24 The audience suggested to include reference to State Road 29 enhancements for transporting people and goods in and out of town into the GMP, as well as referencing improvements to County Road 846 connecting to Naples. Final comments from the audience focused on enhancing airport improvements and focusing on manufacturing goods and shipping them out via truck or air. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 25 Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Public Workshop #3 Summary February 20, 2018 – RCMA Rollason Office Classroom (9:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.) The third public input meeting for the Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy was held on February 20th, 2018 at Revelation Church. The meeting began at approximately 9:15 a.m. and ended at approximately 11:20 a.m. Sixteen people attended the event, see attached for sign in sheet. Anita Jenkins, Principal Planner with Collier County Growth Management, began the session with a short introduction and participants introduced themselves as well. Anita summarized the future land use map, and she mentioned the other master plans that are underway, including the Parks Master Plan. She summarized the Immokalee Master Plan background and purpose, explaining the difference between goals and policies, and outlined the next steps for having the Master Plan transmitted and adopted before the end of the year. Anita identified the handouts on the table explaining the agenda for the meeting. Anita noted the sidewalks map will be updated. There were three tables, each including one facilitator. The following was discussed at the three tables: Vision • Agree with previous meetings on adding the term “family-oriented” • The vision statement seems out of reach and not the current state of things; once the idea of a vision statement was explained, it was agreed that this is a good direction to take • Highlight on the cultural strengths that exist in Immokalee Infrastructure • Need for improved roadways (a lot of unpaved roads) • Immokalee needs a hospital and/or urgent care o A lot of residents drive over an hour to go to their doctor; a health facility that accommodates the population is needed • Prioritize “attractive” appeal (as mentioned in the vision statement). Main roads that people use when coming in from Naples or from the north on State Road 29 should be more inviting. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 26 o Landscaping along roads important for unity throughout Immokalee; focus on maintenance of this landscaping • Street lighting is a priority • Sidewalks on all streets, especially on main spine roads (Immokalee Road, State Road 29, Lake Trafford Road, New Market Road) • Traffic light needed at State Road 29 and Westclox Street; unsafe intersection • Greater traffic calming and re-evaluation of speed limits through residential communities and improved road connectivity • Prioritize safety for both vehicular and pedestrian movement • Language in infrastructure goal should include ‘safe’ and focus on pedestrian and public transit infrastructure: shelters, sidewalks, lighting • Crash data may reflect need for sidewalks instead of paved shoulders • Evacuation route needed west of State Road 29 • Storm water management improvements (specifically along New Market) • Emphasize need for an additional corridor (Loop road) Housing • The term “sanitary housing” is supported. Participants feel this is important for landlords to follow. • Workforce and/or affordable housing is necessary to support the existing community. • Do not want higher-end housing so land value does not increase; if land value increases this is problematic for residents • Do not want the negative impression of poverty in Immokalee; does not want to be only viewed as low-income • Incentives are supported to repurpose housing/existing structures Funding • Funding from County must go into road improvements before civic center • County must be more involved with developers and the public; redevelopment plans should be public so there is involvement Economy • Initiative to be health-conscience; a lot of residents go to the nearest Dollar General to buy processed foods • Create opportunity/incentive for big box stores • Big Box stores would be good if they complement local businesses rather than compete; most residents must drive for an hour to purchase anything besides basic groceries • Local businesses are not diverse because they are all run by a small handful of owners Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 27 • Create opportunity/incentive for specialty commercial/retail which fit the character of Immokalee (farmers’ markets, craft boutiques, cafes, small groceries, flea markets) • Traffic is horrible around Winn-Dixie since it’s the main place for groceries, thus more options are needed • The County should meet with landowners to find out what they consid er to be valid incentives • Existing business could provide positive reviews of area to promote new businesses to come in; this can counter the “crime-ridden” stereotype Other Comments • Break the cycle and provide places and activities for children to play indoors safe out of the rain and heat (i.e., gymnastics, arts) • Culturally driven design standards; increase of murals/public art helps reduce crime rates o RCMA design as a good precedent o Do not over-design landscape to allow for “eyes on the street” o Community/historically-based art • Landscaping standards are important as well – not just design standards • Incentivize redevelopment of existing vacant infrastructure • Need the County to improve existing conditions (roads, street lights, landscape and landscape maintenance, etc.) as a priority over building a civic center • Establishing a connection between the CRA and the Sheriff o This is to help prove this is a safe community, but it is wrongly portrayed • Public transportation needs to be more transparent; publicized, multiple languages and easily read maps • Often an issue with parking The table discussions also addressed future land uses, neighborhoods and sidewalks based on the maps provided. Two of the three tables worked out neighborhood boundaries on their aerial maps. These were collected for analysis by staff. Anita indicated staff may assist in creating graphics that reflect the strengths of Immokalee for local tourism and to make Immokalee more inviting. Near the end of this discussion Frank informed the group that the CRA would like to start a leadership initiative reflecting the Leadership Collier program and encouraged attendees to be a part of it and to let other residents know who may be interested. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 28 Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Public Workshop #4 Summary February 15, 2018 – Immokalee Community Park (5:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m.) The fourth public input meeting for the Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy was held on February 20, 2018 at the Immokalee Community Park. The meeting began at approximately 5:50 p.m. Seven people attended the meeting, four were County officials and staff and three were members of the public. See attached for the sign in sheet. Anita Jenkins, Principal Planner with Collier County Growth Management, began the evening with a discussion summarizing the Immokalee Master Plan background and purpose. Anita summarized existing uses and future land use and zoning. She emphasized the intent of the Master Plan is a top-level view of land use designations that directs goals and visions. She pointed out that zoning controls development standards, setbacks, etc. She highlighted the meeting schedule for the next public meetings in March 2018 and outlined the next steps for having the Master Plan transmitted and adopted with an anticipated completion at the end of 2018. Anita started discussion by explaining the Proposed Immokalee Future Land Use Map (FLUM). She explained that the proposed changes would not render property incompatible or inconsistent. Anita then introduced the Vision Statement stating that it is currently drafted from the CRA Vision Statement which was created with public input. Participants in prior meetings suggested including a focus on families. The public asked “Does stable neighborhoods mean a focus away from migrant housing?” Anita said that the vision statement refers to stable neighborhoods with the intent to improve dilapidated homes and encourage appropriate uses, such as excluding industrial uses in residential areas. Anita assured that there were not a significant number of changes to the proposed Future Land Use Map. The most significant changes include a larger Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict boundary and an extension of the Recreation Tourist Subdistrict to wrap around Lake Trafford. Anita indicated that the color scheme is different between the adopted and propos ed Future Land Use Map; it is updated with colors that are more consistent with industry standards. For example, gray is commonly associated with Industrial uses and red is commonly associated with commercial uses. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 29 Anita further explained that updating the Master Plan entices business owners and investors to build in Immokalee because appropriately designated land creates “build-ready” sites that are attractive to investors and builders. A participant suggested there was an issue of decreased property values associated with the proposed Master Plan Update in 2012. Anita said; the proposed changes do not affect zoning; they simply allow more opportunity without requiring a long Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. Questions were raised regarding the State Road 29 reconfiguration, specifically the potential for commercial growth, and staff identified that State Road 29 is intended for truck use and no changes are proposed for commercial use along State Road 29 at this time because it is intended to function as an alternate route or bypass. In response to inquiries about the updating of land uses every ten or five years, staff responded that land uses were previously updated in seven-year cycles but that is no longer required. Others commented in order to rezone property, the project must meet the three C’s: Consistency, Concurrency and Compatibility. Staff explained that the proposed goals are similar but more concise than the adopted goals. Generally, goals are broad while policies are more detailed and specific. Staff indicated that proposed GOAL 7 is specific to Immokalee and is intended to further define setbacks, landscape standards, etc. to make Immokalee unique. Staff further discussed the Future Land Use Map and explained that commercial areas are justified by population. Industrial areas are guided by opportunity, and not population driven. An aerial map was presented by staff with the intent to identify existing neighborhoods. Anita highlighted a few existing neighborhoods including the Golden Triangle and the Fruit Bowl. She posed questions such as, “Is this neighborhood complete?” Defining neighborhoods elevate the family focus that Immokalee desires and provides opportunity to coordinate needs. For example, does Southside need sidewalks? When asked about replacing mobile homes per the proposed Future Land Use policies, staff said the mobile home replacement issue was resolved in 2017 through the Land Development Code. The public asked if an owner or developer would still need to go through zoning to build an apartment complex. Staff responded that yes, zoning is still required for development, however, it is easiest to choose an existing area with higher residential density allowed per the Future Land Use Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 30 Map. However, an apartment complex could be sought nearly anywhere if and when a developer goes through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, which takes a lot of time. Staff presented the Sidewalks Map and pointed out numerous transit stops, but a lack of sidewalk connection. Anita suggested that an updated plan for future sidewalks allows staff to write grants to meet the goals. Anita provided an email address for comments and documents to be published (IAMPrestudy@colliercountyfl.gov). There will be two more workshops in March. The meeting ended at approximately 6:45p.m. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 31 Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Public Workshop #5 Summary April 25th, 2018 – CareerSource 750 South 5th St. (8:30 a.m. –10:30 a.m.) The Immokalee Master Plan morning session meeting began at approximately 8:38 a.m. and concluded at approximately 10:27 a.m. This was a joint CRA, MSTU and Immokalee Area Master Plan public meeting. The Pledge of Allegiance was conducted, followed by a moment of silence. The date was announced, along with roll call. Approximately five members of the CRA, five members of the MSTU, and eleven members of the public were in attendance. Attendees were each given a hard-copy of meeting material for review and discussion. The distributed Proposed Immokalee Area Mater Plan reflected the comments from previous public meetings and recommendations from Collier County staff in strike-through and underline format. A Future Land Use Map, Neighborhoods Map, and Sidewalk Map associated with the Master Plan were also distributed. Anita Jenkins opened the meeting and explained that any additional comments can be emailed to IAMPrestudy@CollierCountyFL.gov until May 25th. In June, staff will have the Master Plan material prepared and submitted to the Board of County Commissioners. Anita presented the proposed changes to the Master Plan in page-by-page format. She referenced the introduction on pages 2 and 3, which has been updated since the 2012 Restudy data. The Vis ion Statement is included with the introduction, and it has been updated to reflect the policies. Pages 4 and 5 included only minor revisions. Page 6 begins the discussion of Goal 1, which is important for conveying to others what is important to the community. The focus of Goal 1 is business opportunities, positivity and enhancing and diversifying the community. She explained that the CRA “Project List” is more appropriate in the Infrastructure section. Anita explained that the references to economic drivers were not changed. Anita discussed Policy 2.2.1 related to the Expedited Review process which was important from 2012 to 2016. She shared Resolution 2016-247 with the attendees and said because the resolution has been adopted, it’s not important to still be referenced in the Master Plan. Policy 2.4.2 Cultural Programs and Facilities was deemed repetitive of Policy 1.3.1, so it was removed to keep the document concise. The next change was to Technical Assistance which has been Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 32 reworked to remove the responsibility of the CRA so as not to overburden them. The BOCC is a better option to delegate tasks to the most appropriate staff. Anita then discussed changes based on prior workshops to address housing and neighborhoods per Objective 2.1 and Collier County’s intent to “identify neighborhood improvements needed to elevate the neighborhood quality of life.” At previous Master Plan public meetings, attendees were asked to identify neighborhoods within Immokalee and to refine boundaries. Anita asked attendees to review the Neighborhoods Map to ensure it is correct. This helps to accurately identify needs on a neighborhood basis, including parks, tot lots, water management projects, transit stops, safe access and lighting. Anita then mentioned that she is not only working with the community, but also with County Transportation staff and the Housing Department. She noted that the Florida Health Department has authority over farmworker and migrant housing, and the County only has control over the development standards for such housing. Policies in the Master Plan are limited on matters that are governed by agencies other than the County. An attendee commented that it is a mistake to focus on farmworker housing. Instead, the focus should be housing that supports the workforce, noting that tourism is a driving force and the housing need to be addressed to accommodate this. Anita responded that Goal 2 is to provide quality neighborhoods with a full range of housing for all. She welcomed attendees to provide strengthened language for that goal. Anita referenced Policy 2.2.1 Targeted Redevelopment Areas meant to address neighborhood needs. Areas of concern include sidewalks, lighting, recreation areas and proximity to fresh foods. Instead of fresh foods being available exclusively at flea markets, they should be available within neighborhoods with specific design requirements to be outlined in the Land Development Code. Anita spoke to Policy 2.2.6 Farmworker Housing Land Development Regulation s. This policy is being maintained in the Master Plan, and language is added noting that there need to be quality neighborhoods with a full range of housing for all Immokalee residents. She added that Collier County is currently in the midst of an extensive housing study, and the incentives are being worked out through Board of County Commissioner direction. Those incentives are referenced in the Master Plan. Objective 3.1 is the location where reference to the CRA Project List is proposed to move. Commissioner McDaniel referenced Policy 3.1.2, stating it gives a pass for the Board to extend timeframes. Anita said that timeframes are established, but the Board has authority to adjust them. Discussion ensued about removing Policy 3.1.2 because it says that there is a timeframe established, but not really, making it contradictory. Another attendee agreed to remove the policy language. Debrah Forester suggested changing the title of “Targeted Redevelopment Area” to “Targeted Neighborhood Areas.” The CRA has Improvement areas and this might be confusing. She also Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 33 suggested establishing priority improvements than can be reviewed annually. The idea of identifying and referring to neighborhoods was discussed by the group. Debrah Forester suggested adding the verbiage “coordination with departments” in Policy 1.5.1. to reach the end goal of all County agencies being accessible. On Page 13 in Policy 4.2.1, “encouraging active lifestyles” was moved back to the neighborhood section where the policy intent is similar. Anita explained that neighborhood “facilities” may be conveyed a “buildings,” which is not the intent, because a ballfield or tot lot can be a neighborhood facility. Thus, the idea of recreational areas is preferred. Anita explained a Parks M aster Plan effort is ongoing, and it will address community park policies. An attendee asked: Will Anita cross reference the Parks Master Plan? Anita confirmed it is a good idea, and the Housing Plan will also be cross referenced. An attendee suggested that recreation areas should not only be on the ground, but also on the roofs of some buildings. An attendee asked about Objective 1.3, Tourism, Recreation, Entertainment and Cultural Opportunities and noted the plan only references recreation. Tourism and Cultural Opportunities should have their own objectives to identify expansion opportunities. Anita mentioned that tourism is referenced in an Objective, and subsequent policies, but there is a possibility to expand and give greater specificity. The attendee said she will send further comments via email. Another attendee mentioned that agritourism is skipped in Objective 1.3, and it should be added. More comments were shared about keeping the language general and expanding on the entertainment policy. Anita noted to add an objective the under economic goal and move agritourism policy there as well. It was suggested to expand and explain the entertainment policy. Anita discussed arrangements of the document including an additional Objective under the economic development goal. Debrah Forester then mentioned that tourism promotes people to live, work and conduct business in Immokalee. Anita advised against pulling the objective apart, but just enhancing and being more specific in the policies. She mentioned that she is cautious about making any changes without the public’s input, and she appreciates the feedback. Regarding Policy 3.3.1 on page 13, an attendee asked why the word “future” is being crossed out. Anita explained that the County is prioritizing the people who live here now. The Land Development Code specifies and requires new neighborhoods to connect to existing neighborhoods and the grid system. Anita suggested to add a policy for new neighborhoods to connect wi th the existing grid system with sidewalks as well. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 34 Debrah asked if the Sidewalk Map will be referenced in the Master Plan. Anita confirmed that is will be included. The idea of adding verbiage “as amended” was suggested so the Master Plan would maintain consistency over time. An attendee mentioned the Long-Range Transportation Improvements should be bulleted according to priority. For example, improve SR 82 and SR 29 and add the bypass road later. Anita responded that the Transportation Department gave updates on road projects, noting State Road 82 is underway, and SR 29 is being discussed. Anita mentioned that bypass alternatives are being reviewed. She noted that in the northwest area there is a lack of a complete grid that restricts bus access, and that bicycle and pedestrian pathways are needed in so many areas. The attendee reiterated that the multiple references to the bypass road gives the wrong impression that it’s a high priority for Immokalee. Debrah Forester suggested a separate policy on transportation, specific to completing the grid system. Long-term transportation is addressed by the MPO, but there are opportunities for identifying regional projects that needs funding. An attendee mentioned that a one-page guide is needed to explain what this Master Plan is and is not. Everyone has different opinions on what this is. Anita said she’d be happy to provide such a guide. Anita explained references to transit services on page 15, which she has reviewed with Michelle Arnold the Collier Area Transit Director. The Transit staff need to address corridors and indicate improvements. The Master Plan addresses corridors but not transit operations, which is subject to change as technology changes. She said there is no need for the transportation concurrency policy, which was inserted during the last Restudy. Anita said there is plenty of road capacity in Immokalee and no density increases are proposed, so there are no concurrency deficiencies and the policy is not needed. An attendee asked if a downtown business could be on a first -floor with second-floor residential. Anita confirmed that is already allowed in the Mixed-Use District. Anita reviewed page 16 and the Clean Immokalee Plan. She referenced a presentation by Roy Spence, Hall of Famer in the marketing business, who coined “Don’t Mess with Texas” as part of a Clean Up Texas Campaign with public service announcements provided by Willie Nelson and Stevie Ray Vaughan. She mentioned that this strategy should be considered. Immokalee has great athletes who could promote a Clean Immokalee campaign. Debrah mentioned that a timeframe for development and implementation needed to be added to this policy, and Anita suggested adding a two-year timeframe. Anita discussed Policy 4.1.1. on page 16 related to incentives through land development regulations, including studying other Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) programs. Anita advised that other strategies should be pursued rather than TDRs. Buying TDRs costs money and in turn r aises housing costs. Natural resource protection can be accomplished through water farming and mitigation, and Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 35 she suggested that staff resources could be used to consider other natural resource protection opportunities. An attendee asked if TDRs could be maintained as an option. Another attendee replied that the that the policy directs staff to study other TDR programs. Anita reiterated that TDRs costs money, which raise the costs of housing, and that density blending that preserves land and allows development should be explored. Commissioner McDaniel mentioned that the Board is looking to create an Immokalee Chapter in the LDC to address such issues as these. He cautioned that evaluating the TDR options could be costly. An attendee mentioned that while it is great to address in the LDC, it is also important to include a general reference to TDRs so the Master Plan is not inconsistent. Anita then mentioned that Policy 4.1.1 on page 16 does address density bonuses and transfer of rights. Kris Van Lengen commented that Policy 4.1.1 was very specific and questioned if such specificity was needed. Other attendees agreed with this concern. Anita advised that the title for Policy 4.1.2 is changed from Lake Trafford Development to Lake Trafford Water Quality. The title change reflects the continuation of water quality improvements. Anita noted that she met with Pollution Control staff to ensure this is still accurate. Anita described deleting Policy 5.1.4 entitled “Conservation Designation,” because the term “conservation” may bring about unintended consequences to the detriment of eco-tourism by limiting the recreational use of properties. Instead, protection functions can be accomplished through easements. Anita advises that Policy 6.1.3 is removed, because it’s redundant to the right-to-farm act in Florida Statues. Policy 6.1.4 related to farmworker housing is also removed because the Florida Department of Health regulates this topic. Anita discussed the policies on rezoning and consistency by policy for mobile homes. An a ttendee asked why mobile homes are referenced as “temporary” residency? Anita explained that it is associated with temporary homes during construction in Agricultural areas. She described issues that arose from the 2012 planning effort affecting the abil ity for continuation of mobile home properties. She described the overlay in the LDC for Immokalee mobile home properties. She said the LDC is the resource for anyone interested to review the mobile home overlay standards for Immokalee, which have recently been adopted to address local issues. Anita pointed out that Immokalee is a food desert. There is limited access to fruits or vegetables. She explained the recommended addition to the policy allowing for fresh fruit and vegetable stands or trucks in neighborhoods. A participant asked if there are standards included for fruit or vegetable stands. Anita answered that the LDC will address standards, and the Master Plan just allows for them. The group discussed that standards and better Code enforcement are needed so illegal operations can be dealt with. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 36 Anita identified proposed updates to Policy 6.1.2 related to the location of service uses to reference “community” parks within a ½-mile area. Commissioner McDaniel mentioned that these policies will assist the Board and staff to direct implementation. Policy 7.1.3 related to innovative design was removed because it’s redundant. Anita referenced the Immokalee Government Services Center and noted that the public wants a civic center for people to gather, providing opportunities for entertainment and cultural uses. An attendee mentioned that the Master Plan language gives the appearance that a mayor is wanted, and no one wants that. The attendee expressed that government staff should be based in Naples, not in Immokalee. Commissioner McDaniel stressed that the Master Plan identifies that government offices could be located in one area. Anita said a mayor was not the intent of a government center, and that the revisions were based on public input, which is important. Anita went on to discuss commercial zoning and separation standards, and verbiage was added to include “unless authorized by BOCC” to allow for applicants to ask Board approval of projects that are good for the community. Commissioner McDaniel noted the criteria seem too specific, and Anita stated she agreed and that she would address consistency between policies. An attendee asked about the policy allowing fruit or vegetable sales in neighborhoods, and if gardens are allowed. Anita advised that gardens are allowed, but once vegetables are sold it is considered a business which is not allowed. For fruit stands proposed in neighborhoods, the LDC will regulate how those fruit stands will appear. Anita highlighted the change to expand the Recreational Tourist Subdistrict around Lake Trafford to support eco-tourism. She addressed Commissioner McDaniel’s concern about residential parcel size criteria being too specific by explaining the standards that are specific will be moved out of the Master Plan and into the Land Development Code, which allows for deviations and amendments through Board of County Commissioner approval. Commissioner McDaniel stressed the importance of maintaining the public’s interest through making the Master Plan more global, and the Land Development Code more specific. Anita said policies on density, density bonuses, and density rating system will not be changed. She said transient lodging density will also be maintained in the Master Plan. Commissioner McDaniel raised concern that the density standard of 26 units per acre for transient lodging could be too limiting. Debrah stated transient lodging and hotel may be defined differently, and Anita said she will review the definitions. An attendee asked if the area around Lake Trafford labeled as CMU on the Future Land Use Map is the Habitat community? Anita confirmed this, and stated it is not changing because the County is not able to downgrade development rights. Another participant asked if a certain designated area was increased. Anita answered yes, the RT boundary was increased. An attendee asked about the zoning of the Winn Dixie property, and Anita Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 37 confirmed the property’s land use designation is CMU which allows rezoning as necessary for the property. Debrah asked about Goal 7 coordination of government agencies and the need for an Emergency Operations Center after Hurricane Irma. Anita confirmed the EOC could be referenced in a separate policy. Debrah asked if the Sidewalk Map could be referred to as a 5-year plan including more detail of sidewalk locations and material types, which can be updated over time. Commissioner McDaniel added that TIGER Grant projects are underway and should be included. Anita answered that the green areas on the map reflect the TIGER Grant projects. She said that unfunded projects can be added as another line item on the map. An attendee requested a draft grid map to show connection areas. Anita replied that such a map could be developed per the policy regarding the issue of proposed connections. Anita said comments can provided by email or telephone. The meeting concluded at 10:27 a.m. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 38 Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Public Workshop #6 Summary April 25th, 2018 – Immokalee Community Park 321 N. 1st St Immokalee FL 34142 5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. The meeting began at 5:44 p.m. with eight participants in attendance. Anita Jenkins introduced the revised Immokalee Area Master Plan that includes recommendations based on public input. She explained that this plan includes six years’ worth of work. The plan is in strikethrough and underlined format. She explained that the final document will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners in June to start the review and update process. She mentioned that feedback can be provided to Commissioner McDaniel. She explained the proposed Plan language in page -by-page format. On pages 2 and 3, there were only small changes to the Introduction that recognized background work. The Vision statement was added to the Introduction, and it reflects intent of the polici es, focusing on strengthening the economy, housing for everyone, diversity of economy, and walkable neighborhoods. Anita explained the intent of the Comprehensive Plan is to guide growth. The Future Land Use Map only says what you can do, it is an indicator of opportunity. The Future Land Use Map is not intended to suggest that a property owner is out of compliance, but rather the Comprehensive Plan is meant to guide the community in growth. On page 6, the Goal 1 is essentially a CRA annual infrastructure project list and that information has been moved to a more appropriate section. The new Goal 1 is to attract business and economic growth. The opening of the plan is now focused on enhancing and diversifying Immokalee. On page 7, Policy 2.2.1 Expedited Review is already taken care of through Resolution 2016-247 and thus it has been removed. Anita identified that Policy 1.3 was discussed in the morning session. Anita said the next time the Master Plan revisions are presented, it will incorporate the group’s suggestion to break out tourism, eco-tourism, recreation, entertainment and cultural opportunities, and it will be more specific with those economic drivers. An attendee commented that there is no entertainment present in Immokalee, while another participant mentioned the Casino is entertainment. Another responded that the Casino is not family oriented, and an amphitheater for families is desired. Anita continued on page 9 stating Policy 2.4.2 is redundant and has been removed. Policy 1.5.1 had delegated a lot of work to the CRA, and the updated language allows Collier County staff to provide Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 39 technical assistance. Anita mentioned that the language will be strengthened to allow for intergovernmental coordination. On page 10, Goal 2 and Policy 2.1.1 define neighborhoods. Defining neighborhoods will manifest in more complete neighborhoods, because needs for parks, stormwater management and other improvements can be identified. Input from the past public meetings has defined neighborhood boundaries on the Neighborhoods Map. A participant mentioned that neighborhood names need to be simplified, for instance, instead of calling an area “The Fruit Basket” consider picking a produce. Another attendee suggested to not change that neighborhood name because that is how the community has referred to the area for many years. Another suggested that Fruit Basket needs a new boundary, with Carson and Eden Park defining that boundary. Anita explained Policy 3.1.1 references to farmworker housing have been removed, because the Health Department has authority over housing regulations. Reference to regulations were moved to the LDC, Policy 2.2.6. An attendee commented that mobile homes need to be allowed, although fixed up, but still allowed. Anita explained the goal is to provide a diversity of housing to meet all the needs of the community and not just a focus on farmworker housing. The participants engaged in conversation about logistics and regulations of subsidized housing, specifically in relation to Trafford Isles and the apartment building development within Arrowhead. Anita directed the audience to look at Policy 2.3.1 on page 12 that addresses Housing Grant Opportunities. This policy relates to the County Housing Plan and will allow grant funding to be funneled to Immokalee area housing projects. Anita said text is added to Goal 3 from the original Goal 1. She advised that in the earlier session today, Commissioner McDaniel commented that Policy 3.1.2 allows an extra timeframe and that extra flexibility is not appropriate. If the policy states it should be done in two years, then it should be completed on time. The attendees agreed with this revision. Anita referenced Policy 3.2.4. – Encourage Active Lifestyles on page 13, stating the intent is to complete neighborhoods with tot lots, basketball court, community gardens and more. Attendees mentioned that any parks put in place need to be larger or regional parks. Anita responded that the County’s Parks Master Plan will address parks, however, small parks are more affordable to maintain, and the intent is to create gathering areas for the community that are walkable in relation to their neighborhood. Anita mentioned that the Parks Master Plan is currently being worked on and will be presented in June. An attendee commented that Dreamland, a current park, is vacant. Another participant mentioned that new equipment was just installed at that specific park near the back. Anita explained that page 14 discusses Long Range Transportation Impr ovements. State Road 82 has been approved and in the works, including roundabout and four-lane widening. The SR 29 bypass routes are being worked on and have been narrowed down to two choices. Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 40 Anita explained that Policy 4.2.7 was removed because operations should not be addressed in the Master Plan. Transportation concurrency was removed because there is no deficiency on roadway networks. She said the language regarding Stormwater Management on page 16 will reference the Stormwater Master Plan so that it is easy to maintain consistency as other plans are updated. In reference to Policy 3.4.1: Clean Immokalee Plan, Anita shared her experience with Roy Spence “Hall of Fame” marketer and how he initiated the “Don’t Mess With Texas” Campaign as a Clean Up initiative to clean up litter. This may be a positive option for Immokalee. A participant mentioned possibly working with the “Keep Collier Beautiful Campaign.” Another participant asked if there are neighborhood associations in Immokalee, and another attendee confirmed there are, for example, Jubilation, Arrowhead and some Habitat projects. A participant asked if the Blue Zones Project will be incorporated in this effort. Anita stated the Blue Zones Project specifically will not be in the plan, but the philosophy and principles of Blue Zones are reflected. For example, Immokalee has a fresh foods desert although this is an agricultural community. The Master Plan supports fresh food markets in close proximity to neighb orhoods. A focus on smaller neighborhood parks is also supportive of Blue Zones principles. Improved sidewalks and lighting are also supported in the Master Plan. A participant asked if neighborhood gardens were supported in the Master Plan. Anita indi cated that neighborhood and community gardens are currently allowed . A participant noted that Immokalee has ice cream trucks, but questioned why the community doesn’t have vegetable trucks. Another participant indicated that vegetable trucks are in the a rea. Some private gardeners package their food and drive to higher-end neighborhoods to sell their produce in the Naples gated communities. Anita directed the conversation to the Lake Trafford Development section on page 17. She indicated that the title was changed to “Lake Trafford Water Quality” to shift the focus on water quality, which the community has worked so hard to improve over the years. This section of the Master Plan discusses water quality goals, not development goals. She explained the Conservation Designation policy on page 17 was moved to the Land Development Code. An attendee asked who funds the additional language to the LDC? Anita responded that Collier County has an LDC staff. The attendee wanted to know who is working on Best Management Practices (BMPs). Anita responded that staff will coordinate with other agencies in developing BMPs. A participant mentioned the water issues after Hurricane Irma and wanted assurance that Immokalee is included in the Collier County budget. The participant asked: When the LDC is discussed, will staff come to Immokalee and will the public’s input be considered? Anita confirmed that meetings will be held in Immokalee and public input is Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 41 very appreciated. She also noted that Commissioner McDaniel has already initiated the need for a specific Immokalee Land Development Code (LDC). The discussion shifted to the rezoning process. Anita explained that the Comprehensive Plan is the top level of regulation and zoning is more property-specific. She referenced Policy 5.1.6 Rezonings and Growth Management Plan Consistency by Policy on page 19. Anita stated that in the past it was a problem to allow mobile homes, however, that issue was resolved with LDC Section 2.03.07 Mobile Home Overlay Zoning District. A participant asked if the Overlay District only allows mobile homes, or does it address driveways and such? Anita responded that the Mobile Home Overlay Zoning District only allows the use of mobile homes, however, the LDC regulates driveway materials, tie downs, etcetera. Another attendee asked how mobile homes are condemned. Anita responded that the County Housing Plan is addressing condemnation issues and is in the process of being updated. An attendee asked about mobile home parks being up t o code. Anita responded that replacing a mobile home only requires consistency with the approved site plan. A new mobile home park would need to adhere to current LDC requirements for driveways and sidewalks. Anita suggested participating in the Immokalee LDC process as it goes through updates and changes. Anita highlighted objectives and policies related to density under Goal 6. She indicated that nothing has changed in the Master Plan in reference to density. She said the impediment to approval of the last Master Plan update may have been due to proposed density changes at that time. She said the existing density in the plan is appropriate and allows for growth, and there is no need to make unnecessary changes, so no new density recommendations are being proposed. She added that the density rating system and bonus density policies have not changed. Anita requested feedback on the Land Use Map. She asked if there was a need for more commercial areas or other changes. Comments from a previous CRA m eeting were to define the Triangle area as a central business district. Anita said that change would make sense if the plan were starting anew, but there is no need to disrupt a stable neighborhood. She suggested that dilapidated residential areas are a good opportunity for replacement with commercial uses. A participant commented that the downtown Commercial Mixed Use area on the southern side of Main Street was reduced on the map. The businesses do not have enough room for dumpsters behind the buildings, stormwater retention, or setbacks. An attendee mentioned impact fees and the difficulty to attract businesses to Immokalee when they will generate ten percent of the revenue compared to having the same business located in Naples. Another participant requested education for residents, such as a Home Health 101 course. The Immokalee residents that come from third world countries do not know cleaning practices and standards. Attendees discussed the solid waste problem on Main Street . Attendees asked who is Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 42 responsible for the dumpster situation, whether it is the property owner, the leasing business or Waste Management. One participant said that a community dumpster might be the solution if business owners would collectively install and share costs for a larger dumpster. The current system of extra trash pick ups and sending staff out to clean just isn’t working. The conversation shifted to playgrounds and establishing recreation areas every half mile. Anita responded that staff was working on the inventory of these facilities. A participant asked about a 24-hour urgent care. Anita responded that an urgent care use is allowed, but would require rezoning of property. The participant responded that medical offices exist, but the businesses and services provided needs to be enhanced. The discussion shifted to rezoning a specific property. A participant asked if a current zoning map is available, and Anita indicated that she could email the current zoning map. The group discusse d if C-4 and C-5 zoning allows for a used car lot. Anita responded that the C-4 designation allows for new car lots, and the C-5 designation allows for used car lots. Anita indicated that the Neighborhoods Map and Sidewalk Map will be a part of the Maste r Plan. A participant asked about medical marijuana, and how associated uses are being addressed. Anita responded that there is an evening meeting on April 30 at 5:05 that will address marijuana dispensaries in the LDC. A participant wanted to know what type of business is associated with medical marijuana. Anita responded that it is an agricultural business because it is being grown. When asked where such use is allowed, Anita responded that commercial uses allow for dispensaries and that regulations for medical marijuana establish a minimum distance from schools. She indicated that dispensaries are not regulated like alcohol stores, but more like a pharmacy. The discussion then shifted to the grow house on SR 29 that is approved near the Hendry Coun ty line. A participant asked about the area of Immokalee. Anita responded that Immokalee has approximately 17,000 acres, with approximately 10,000 undeveloped acres, most of which are being used for active agriculture. The conversation moved to a discussion on the areas that are in the Immokalee Sewer and District area. Anita wrapped up the meeting and mentioned that BCC meetings can be viewed at www.colliercountyfl.gov. She encouraged participants to email comments and ideas to IAMPrestudy@CollierCountyFL.gov. The meeting concluded at 7:14 pm Attachment 'B'9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Attachment B IAMP White Paper (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 115Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.g Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.gPacket Pg. 149Attachment: Transmittal Resolution - CCPC (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) apLrø D ai TlrwE NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed.Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na- ples,in said Collier County,Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida,each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida,for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV 2200088 CPSP-2018-5/PL201800 4500190197 Pub Dates January 11,2019 Z'1 Sign/? 4: ure of affiant) M. ^..,,.. KAROLEKANGAS I ida a Sworn to and subscribed before me 6• s F. • Commission/GG 2604Rut*- State of 1 MyCnmm,Erplrcs1o129,3071 I This January 11,2019 i 6„d,d„„,,,g,,1,t,„r,bl.1,Am, I and f qomer,0 Signature of affiant) 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 06_CCPC Trans_Affidavits-Advertisements (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 26A 1 FRIDAY,JANUARY 11,2019 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS ZVZOU Voted BEST W WALK-IN ` `;F IFNEW! CLINIC in Naples! 20Q 2013,2014,2015,2016,2017 FMILLMiLLENNIUM NAPLES MEDICAL CENTERm..mo., FOR ALL YOUR TYRONE J.MEDINA,M.D. URGENT CARE NEEDS Board Certified Emergency Medicine JUST ARRIVED! X-rays,MRI,649-3333 3 locations Ultrasound,CT Scans M-F 8:30am-7pm,Sat 8:30am-5pm Traveler's Clinic 400 8th Street North 2950 9TH STREET NORTH,HIBISCUS CENTER.NAPLES•(239)261-2882 2355 VANDERBILT BEACH RD.,SHOPPES AT VANDERBILT.NAPLES•(239)594-8265 • Immigration Physicals Across from NCH downtown 249490 SOUTH TAMIAMI TRAIL.BONITA SPRINGS•(239)949-0217 No-rxN000s2401 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Alau, YOUR BEST CHOICE Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission sitting as the EST Local Planning Agency and the Environmental Advisory Council,will hold a"Special" JUST GOT BETTERI public meeting on January 31,2019,commencing at 10:00 A.M.at CareerSource, 7 7f' J!;' r r:I '..J Large Conference Room,located at 750 S.5°Street,Immokalee,FL 34142. fes- The PA RES of the hearing T to consider. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ENERGY EFFICIENT HOME IMPROVEMENTS4OgEBVICE PROPOSINGAMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, FUNDING OPTIONS! aCAEISt RELATING TO THE IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN RESTUDY AND SPECIFICALLYAMENDINGTHE INLMOKALEEAREAMASTER AIR CONDITIONING It ELECTRICAL w.PLUMBING NO 6IMMICNSi PLAN ELEMENT AND THE IMMOKALEE FUTURE LAND USE MAP; z II• lAND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE i., ''I AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. IPL201800022581 r c In n I is=" r eJ 1 E 1 . IF$ 1299oFFvom A NEW A/C UNIT 1 I 1 1 R.. 3,,.,. r E Roe bP11Ht -O a A/C $119IIALIE All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed I ( a( 1 T I TUNE•UP I RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section,2800 N.Horseshoe Dr.,Naples,between the hours t "P " I of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 RM.,Monday through Friday.Furthermore,the materials will be made available for inspection at the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency V.11.111101.114.1,(01.20113n,V.11.111101.114.1,(01.20113uV.11.111101.114.1,(01.20113"•• V CRA)during the month of January 2019 located at 750 S"Street,Immokalee,FL.nr....r.my m n...M r.s.. 34142. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD p 1 Zoning Division,Community Planning Section.Written comments shall be filed with IN PAYMENTS PI 1111$ I Principal Planner,Anita Jenkins prior to January 31,2019 will be read and considered Will 2021 _NO C BEp i CHECK O/INI J at the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning AWARD-WINNING SERVICE ',TRUSTWORTHY CERN'ISD TECHNICIANS Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, I FAMILY-OWNED&ORFRATED SINCE YEAS WE MAKES°,S'SNAKE VISIT EASY,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record BE includes the testimony evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of HOME SERVICES ,_mm ss..c>m-,,,,, ,,,- certain assistance. 3 once.Please contact the Collier County s, FLie3 11 - 5355Management 9) 252, located a[3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples, 34112-5356,(239)252- 239_271_2454 impa et least 1 week prior to the of ou. ed listening fficees for the hearing Yom, impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. NI IIE11I8ECIMIQS. Mark P.Strain,Chairman s ssa.,,.x AyO9,,,,,,,, ,•,,, Ay,,,,,",,,s,,,,, mom,Collier County Planning Commission January 11,2019 Join Bret Baier and Fellow All-Stars on February 16,2019 in raising funds to improve the lives of patients and their families. 310 Z The evening features an exclusive auction and a fair and balanced discussion on the state of Washington with a special look at what goes on behind the scenes. Irk All guests are treated to a seated dinner with full beverage service. Chtldrens National For more information visit httpsl/www.allstarpanelevent.com/ 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 06_CCPC Trans_Affidavits-Advertisements (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: 06_CCPC Trans_Affidavits-Advertisements (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: 06_CCPC Trans_Affidavits-Advertisements (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: 06_CCPC Trans_Affidavits-Advertisements (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal) 9.A.1.h Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 06_CCPC Trans_Affidavits-Advertisements (7553 : Immokalee Restudy Amendments - Transmittal)