Agenda 12/15/2009 Item #10D
rt....l;','
Agenda Item No. 10D
December 15, 2009
Page 1 of 56
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Re~ommendation to adopt a resolution authorizing the condemnation of a fee simple interest
parcel and a temporary construction easement parcel required for the construction of
redesigned improvements to the intersection of Collier and Davis Boulevards. (Collier
Boulevard Project No. 60092 and Davis Boulevard Project No 60073). Estimated fiscal
:mpact: $235,500.
OBJECTIVE: To adopt a resolution authorizing the acquisition by condemnation of a fee simple
interest parcel and a temporary construction easement parcel required for the construction of
redesigned improvements to the intersection of Collier and Davis Boulevards.
CONSIDERATIONS: On June 24, 2008, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution
No. 2008-199, finding public purpose and necessity and authorizing the condemnation of land and
easements required for the construction of six laning and associated improvements to Collier
Boulevard from soutb of Davis Boulevard to Golden Gate Main Canal. Since tllen, the intersection
of Collier and Davis Boulevards has becn redesigned to provide a larger turning radius for
,outhbound vehicles on Collier Boulevard turning right onto Davis Boulevard. Additional interests
in real property, as depicted in the legal descriptions attached to the proposed resolution, are
required from the northwest quadrant of this intcrsection to accommodate the revised design, and
the County needs to be able to acquire these real property interests by condemnation if necessary.
Construction of this roadway is scheduled to commence in fiscal year 20 I O.
The Board of County Commissioners has been advised through numerous communications of the
need to expand Collier Boulevard and improvc the CollierlDavis intersection. The Board is
herewith being advised of the various factors considered by its professional engineering staff and
consultants, which include the environmental impacts, costs, public health, safety and welfare
considerations, and the long-range planning needs and impacts. Reference is being made to the
attached Technical Memorandum prepared by the firm of CH2.MHill. By its review, concurrence
and approval of this executive summary, the back-up documentation, consultant's presentation, and
the proposed resolution, the Board will have deternlined that the legal descriptions, and the interest
in real property specified on each legal description, which are a part of the attached resulution,
represent the most feasible location, and are necessary for the construction of tJle proposed
improvements to thc intersection ofCoUier and Davis Boulevards.
The Board of County Commissioners has been further advised that it is necessary and in the
public's best interest to acquire, by condemnation if necessary, those interests in real property
specified on each legal description attached to the resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that the cost ofthe additional right-of-way required as a result
of the redesign of the intersection Collier and Davis Boulevards could be as high as $285,500 in a
worst case scenario. This amount includes the cost of the additional real property rights, as well as
all expenses for title work, real estate appraisals, business damages, staff time, and those expenses,
such as property owner altomey's fees and expert witness fees, which the County is required to pay
according to Sections 73.091 and 73.092, F.S. All such payments will come fi'om the
Transportation Supported Gas Tax fund and/or Impact Fee funds. Source of funds are gas tax
Agenda Item NO.1 00
December 15, 2009
Page 2 of 56
and/or impact fees, with said funds allo~"j{'r1 h O,Hier Bou]evard Project No, 60092 in the cUn'ent
approved Five Year Work Program.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The expansion ofbom Collier Boulevard (Project No.
60092) and Davis Boulevard (Project NG. 60073) is an integral part of Collier County's Growth
Management Plan.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is legally sufficient for Board action, - HFAC.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County:
1. Adopt the attached Resolution;
2. Authorize its Chairman to execute same on behalf of the Board; and
3. Authorize any budget amendments that may be necessary to implement the collective will of the
Board as evidenced by the adoption of the attached Resolution and the approval of this
Executive Summary,
FfCl,ared by: Roher'j Bosch, Right-of-Way CO<lrdinator, TECM
Attachment: I) Proposed Condemnation Resolution; 2) Condemnation Resolution No. 2008-l99;
3) Techuical Memorandum for entire project from CH2MHill; and 4) Technical Memorandum for
revised intersection improvements from CH2MHil1.
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Agenda Item No. 10D
December 15, 2009
Page 3 of 56
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
10D
This item to be heard at 11 :30 a.m. Recommendation to adopt a resolution authorizing the
condemnation of a fee simple interest parcel and a temporary construction easement parcel
required for the construction of redesigned improvements to the intersection of Collier and
Davis Boulevards. (Collier Boulevard Project No. 60092 and Davis Boulevard Project No
60073). Estimated fiscal impact: $285.500. (Norman Feder, Transportation Services
Administrator)
12/15/20099:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Robert Bosch
Transportation Division
Right Of Way Coordinator
Date
Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management
11/30/200911:55:40 AM
Approved By
Kevin Hendricks
Transportation Division
Manager ~ Right of Way
Date
Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management
11/30/20092:22 PM
Approved By
Marlene Messam
Transportation Division
Project Manager, Senior
Date
Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management
11/30/20092:51 PM
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Division
Administrator. Transportation
Date
Transportation Administration
12/1/2009 11 :04 AM
Approved By
Najeh Ahmad
Transportation Division
Director. Transportation Engineering
Date
Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management
12/1/20091 :29 PM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney
Date
Approved By
12/1/20093:52 PM
Lisa Taylor
Transportation Division
Management/Budget Analyst
Date
Transportation Administration
12/2/20091:50 PM
Approved By
Therese Stanley
Transportation Division
Manager - Operations Support. Trans
Date
Transportation Administration
12/2/20094:01 PM
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
December 15, 2009
Page 4 of 56
Approved By
Heidi F. Ashton
Section Chief/Land Use-Transportation
Date
County Attorney
COllnty.AttOn1f'Y
12/2/20094:17 PM
Approved By
Pat Lehnhard
Executive Secretary
Date
T"ansportation Division
Transportation Actministration
12/3/20098:26 AM
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
12/3/20091 :06 PM
Approved By
Susan Usher
ManagemenUBudget Analyst, Senior
Date
Office of Management &
Budget
Office of Management & Budget
12/4/20091 :06 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
Management/Budget Analyst, Senior
Date
Office of Management &
Budget
Office of Management & Budget
12/4/20093:16 PM
Approved By
Leo E. Ochs, Jr.
County Manager
Date
County Managers Office
County Managers Office
1214/20094:54 PM
Agenda Item No. 10D
December 15, 2009
Page 5 of 56
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF A FEE SIMPLE INTEREST
PARCEL AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT PARCEL
REQU1RED fOR TIlE CONSTRUCT!O~.: OF REDESIGNED IMPROVEMENTS TO
THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER AND DA VIS BOULEVARDS. (COLLIER
BOULEVARD PROJECT NO. 60092).
WHEREAS, the acquisition of right-of-way for the construction of six laning and associated
improvements to Collier Boulevard from South of Davis Boulevard to Golden Gate Main Canal
(Collier Boulevard Project No. 60092) (hereinafter referred to as "the Project"), is included in Collier
County's Five Year Transportation Work Program; and
WHEREAS, plans and specifications have been prepared for construction ofthe Project; and
WHEREAS, on June 24th, 2008, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2008-199, finding public
purpose and necessity and authorizing the condemnation of land and easements required for the
construction of the Project; and
WHEREAS, a portion of the Project (hereinafter referred to as "the redesigned intersection
improvements") bas since been redesigned, providing improved safety at the intersection of Collier and
Davis Boulevards, and requiring an additional fee simple interest parcel and temporary construction
easement parcel; and
WHEREAS, the location for the construction of the proposed redesigned intersection
improvements has been fixed by survey and is collectively represented by the legal descriptions
comprising Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated berein; and
WHEREAS, after consideration of the availability of alternate routes and locations, the
comparative costs of alternatives for the redesigned intersection improvements, various impacts upon
the environment, long range planning options, and public safety considerations, the Board desires to
exercise its right to condemn property for public purposes.
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
December 15, 2009
Page 6 of 56
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOI VED BY THF BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUN I Y, FLOR-lOA, that it has been determined by tbe Board
that the redesigned improvements to the intersection of Collier and Davis Boulevards ("the redesigned
intersection improvements"), being a p0l1;Oi; of Cc.:l;u 30ulevard Project No. 60092 ("the Project"),
are necessary and in the public's best interest in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the
citizens of Collier County.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the acquisition of land and easements for construction
of the redesigned intersection improvements, as part of the Project, is an integral part of the County's
long range planning effort, and is included in the Transportation Element of the County's
Comprehensive Plan for Growth Management. as approved by the Florida Department of Community
Affairs.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board has reviewed tbe staff reports and
presentations concerning alternative alignments for construction of the redesigned intersection
improvements, and the costs associated with their design, property rights acquisition and construction,
as well as public safety and welfare considerations associated with the design and construction oftbe
redesigned intersection improvements, and variolls impacts to the environment; and the Board finds
that after consideration of these issues. the most favorable alignment for construction of the proposed
redesigned intersection improvements is collectively represented by the legal descriptions comprising
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to construct the redesigned intersection
improvements, it is necessary for the Board to acquire the fee simple interest parcel and the temporary
construction easement parcel described in Exhibit "A".
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOL VED tbat all property shall be put to public purposes.
-Page ~-
L
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
uecember 1 b, LUUli
Page 7 of 56
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the County staff and Office of the County
Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to immediately acquire by gift, purchase or
condemnation in accordance with the provisions of Chapters 73, 74 and 127, Florida Statutes, the
fee simple interest pareel and the temporary construction easement parcel more particularly
described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that no mobile homes are located on the property
sought to be acquired and thcreforc it will not be necessary to remove any mobile homes from
the property to be acquired.
This Resolution, adopted on this "_____ day of
second and majority votc.
, 2009, after motion,
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION"ERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
DONNA FIALA, Chairman
Approved as to form and
legal 'ufficiency: .1
,-,1
.~
H idl Ashton-Cicko
Section Chief, Land Use/Transportation
-Page 3-
I
. I
51~;
eN
~.!. I
wvi !
,,~
"~.
W '
,,,
6-1
U:o::i!
-ili I
~r'
i
:.:-~'I
~l
i
I
,
~~~ !
o<W I'
w8~
~mdl
Ei:c,:"if
:<::6 I
~ I
SECTION .:54
SECTION J
~-
N-
"i
-
.-
C l~ ~o '00
CRAPHICS::AL(
PPRcn 109':-:'::::2
FEE SIMPLE INTEREST
I
'/
/
I ,
f I
"
",
'"
do I
UVl
~w
iE
c::;
::.,
OJ?: I
c-X
w
::1
W
C
U
I /'
\ /'
,/
\
\
\
J
/
~!
~
c
01
~I
.
0',
'"
o~
~CJ'
-!lO~
E,~~ \
~ ffit4 \,
.' ,
~ ~ (~ \
"J\ \.lA~CEL
\ 09FV~;'.
, .
, "
L2f u; NOOI~'~~.[
P08~ I/-~(.'OO'
r N~P'~"()I'" S[CTiO-';
DAI S-eoULEYAR-c)"1Gat;- - /1-SECT10f',
PGCJ i
".
,
h
o
L
'--I
I
1
'00
I
,
I
,
c~--~AB~L ~
II.lNE i.tNC1H m....RI..~
1.1 2C,00 l",a9HQ.Cw
L2 e n N09".~..:Q\'W
-~~- 3620048 ~;;: ~ ;H--f
~S n~ S~'i'2b'32.w
l09FEE2
E..
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
:eCCffi;cr,1 S, 200J
PaQe 8 of 56
C" 'i!' I
itE "V~,'
EXHIBIT "A" !
f'ARCEL 1 ::)9i'"[E2 Page 1 of 2
TI= Ii. .;:.M [kilt
A portton of Soc\ion,:CiO..n3hip 49 Sov\1'1,
Ronl}e 26 Eos\, Coll.er County. rJ()rido, AIUI
M;t'\Q I;> porlio" of lho.. lones d"entled in
Ollie;':]1 Records Book 699. pOQ' 1723 01 \hr
Putll.c Records ol COllie' COllnly. Florida. Being
More porticular!y dllScribed os follow~;
Cc",menc,"<'; ot Ih, .oulheos\ cor".r 01 Set\;Qn
34, T"w"Shr~ 49 So..th. RO"Q' 26 Eost, Colli,.
Cou~ty, .Iorido; 11":,,c, North 99'44'01' Wesl
oiano; the SOlJlh .iri, of ~o;d Sl!ction )4. (\
distone, 01 100,6'7 leet: lrolnCl Norlro
00' 1~'~I" East, 0 di!IOnc. 01 ~O.OO 1",\ \0
1M SOU\h,o,1 c<:>n'llr 01 Iho~e londS ducrillld
,n Olficioll<oco'ds&ook 699, pO<;i1 112301
lnl P"hlicR'cofdS 01 Collier County,florido,
SOlO poin! 01'0 b~,n9 Ih" inlersecl'pr'l 01 tnll'
No,l" ri9hl-Or-wor line 0/ Dov;s aovl.vora ond
t 1>& '0'1"5 t '~o;hl - 0 f - ...O~ li,,~ C'f C olli,r 90ul"....010:
IMnc, "ortn 99'44'01' Wn\ 010"9 \hl Norl:.h
riQtll-OI-"oy I:n. 0' Hlid Dovis 80Uleva'd, 0
d,.(~"c~ 01 7000 leet 10 t'l' Po:.,1 of
S~Q'""in~, \h~nCe .:",,,1;"''':''(1 "10"1:/ ,oid
'"..ht-c'-woy I,r.e NOTtr 69'4~'OI. We~t 8.77
!elll; I~,e"e. NO,H, 50'10'23" (Ost. 0 t:I'iJtonce
C'I 3'.OB I.el to " pOir'l! on H'e WII~I
"Qr.l-of -"or i;"1 01 ~oid :::oll;IIr Bowl,vOld;
i~II%~ ~o"lr' \ "1 ~'C(l (0'1 OIOng so,o West
"~"I_of_"oy Ii"" CI ;listM" 01 5.04 '.111:
I....ene"- I",,,,,.ng ~O;d lighl-"f-",or I'n~ SO\lth
~9'25' 32" Wut 2249 f~"l 10 lhl> POI;,T or
BE C I~. NI" G
:o~\c.;~;nq '50,0 5,,"0Ie r"e\, mC>rc 0' les,
NOES:
1 This'~ not 0 survey
2 9'Js,t Of t-eor:....~ i5 thl! E:o~\ line of
See\iN\ }4. Tow."l~hip <\9S.. ROrlgc 26[,. Collier
CI:'\lnl)"_ rlo"do. tie,l,g t>< OQ'29'ZSr W, F'll;lrida
Stolll Plane Coordi[,l;lte~ NAJ 63/90, ~o~t
ZOl1e
Sut>i~CI ',0 eo~emenI5. 'e5er....otion~ ond
rcs\"e;;l:Dns Of 'e;ord.
<\ ['lsement~ ~hO"" hllreon or.. rer plot.
unle3S otflcrlOise noted,
~
,
5. ;).mcnsions or, in reel ond decimals
thereof
I: Cor~ilit;;ole d outhorilolion LB 43.
7 R/W represen'.s R,qhl-of-Woy
e. P.08 'e;>fUllnl' Po,....l of Be<;i,nning
P.O_C- r!\pre~.enh Point oj Commencement
10. OR. represents QUieial RecorQs.
l' c,B.E. represents Landscape BuH'H
~01ieme,.,t
',2. U,E 'f!;)res'lInts ....'\ility Eosement
~3, ;P.\.t. represllnls rioridc pow<:\r &' Light
~r.s.emen
.~. D,C 'i!p'"ser,l, OrO;<'10';1I C:05..men\
1:;. S_:: rep'e5en~s S:dewol~ [osemer'l\
Hi, P'J,E, n:'pre$..nt~ hAllic Vlility (osemen\.
~d~!.r4dJ.- ""'007
8RADLEY ~, STOCI(HAf.~. P.S,f,I, (>OR THE rIRM)
rLA ,_,,:;. NO. 6390
r..or VAJO WITHOUi THE SIGI~AJURE AND THe
ORIGiNAL RAiSeD S('\L cr A f~ORIOA LiCeNSe)
S'JRVEYO~ AND ~APPEP.
Thill ill Nor a Survey,
~..-':::="..
WllsqnMlllsr
~."......-.-...--._"""'"
-~
---.......---.- ...--.... .....-.-...---
"0' '.~, ;~:J~ Cf..,<,'" ~';::J:,':"~i'\S'_"\co'''.' b'.C' :>i,""ill\':-~Q\\C"''; PIOL.[[:.::"'Ce~~
--..
Ie-HI
"'"
I
_~_,..l
- -- ~-
/' '
I '
c~
S.n;g
c'ro
",,0-
~ow
3a;J~
"""
~o
~NI
zl', ','
w_
u
.... '~'1 I
:a,
~t-." 'I
,-
o
u '
'"
_u:
"
m
A
PARCEL l09TCE2
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT,
\JURATION: 3 YEARS FROM DATE OF CONVEYANCE '2..,
r.E.. 8., (tYl
PARCEL 109TCE2
I~
(~
I I
"':f.-=1
"'
CO
de<nl
Uw
;~
"'" I
CO"
a: a:
w
.:.:J
~
o
u
)
\ //
, ,,/
\/
\
\
~I
~
ro
~I
~
!?~
3\C~
C"
~8:
3CD~ \
PARC:L~~09TC~E2 r
, '"
L11 ~oO"n'~II'E ~
POIl-'~"-~O.oo'
NB9'H'D\~W ,SECTION ~
DAVl-;-;O~~E~ARD 'z~~.i'- S(eTION 2
""
SECTION 34
SECTION ::,
4
3M
.
\>
~I
b
c
z
I
~
o l~ ~ '(Ill
GRAPHIC ~C"'LE
]
'00
LINE TA8LE
I LI~~Q!,EI1_I___JI~!,_RJ.~S1_
1..\ ! 776 N 9'44' 1"w
1..2 40.76 rJ'1 "E
u 5.59 Sllo'J'06"E
1..4 '}2.06 $50"J(;'.""W
1-
I09TCE2
EXHIBIT "A"
P.ge 2 of 2
Doc!
A portion of SectiOl"l 34, Tow""hip 49
$o",tl'l, ROllqfl 25 CO!!1. Coil.!!'! C()unly.
rlo,i~(l. "ltO(. b..ing '" podion 01 \non land.
dneritac in Ot/i.:;cl Recordll Book ~9i, p09.
172J or the ",ublle R'l!:;ord!\ 01 Colliar
C"""\,, FloridO, Baing mora particularly
described os fellows:
Comma"c,nq 01 Ih(\' 50utheo",t cornel Section
:14, Townll'!1;p 4~ Sovth, Rang(\' 25 East.
Coliilll Counly, nori('lO; lhfll\Clil North
89'44'0\" Wt':$1 010n9 \h~ South Ii...... 0/ '0,<:;1
Sec1;on ,H, 0 distol'lca of 12g.44 fltel;
thane, Norlh 00'15'59" [o",t, (I dl",lonc. of
:iO.OO foUl! Ie 0 po;nl on t,," No'th
righI-a/-way line of Oa~i, Boulevor(l laid
poi"IQI."olyin'i""lh" So",thlina QI (I>on
lend!. dncrioed in Ollic;<;ll RecOrdli Book
Sgg. fNge \72J of !hll P"bhe Reco"j, of
Colli", County. fiorilio. also D,i"'9 tn, POINi
OF a[CI';"IING: \r'Mell North a,r44'O\" '....c,,!
olon\l lhl Nortn 'i9hl-of-woy line 01 soia
Davis Sovlevord,odi!\oneeof 17Bfeel:
If\!~~t Nod', aO' I &';;:3" EOII, 0 (li.lgno. ot
~a76 fell\ to 0 pair'l\ on 111! We-st
'igM\-ol-woy liM of COllier 90,,1(\'~ord:
I","el So~lh \ 1'1 J'06" Eo!! OIOrIC] scid
WItSI <i9M-of-way line. 0 d,!loru::, of 5.59
Iflee lher'lce SO<Jlh 51J\6'7;r," WUI, a
\JlsIOI1l'~ 01 J2.D!I I"t\ \0 th, 1'011';1 OF
B~GINNING
Cont::lI,.,i"'g lB2.0 ~QUO'l! 'IIeI, more or letS.
NOTCS:
\ T";ll is not 0 sur\l~Y
2 Oosis t:'~ beoriflg is the East lifle of
Section 34, TOwnsMip 495., Rongc 26(" Collier
County. Florido, tll.imt N O(j29'2g~ W, Florida
Stole Plonll Coordinotes NAD 8J/90, Eas!
lent'
,3, Subject lo IWSllmentS. reservations OM
rlJslricliOl1li of "e~or\,l.
4. Eosemel'\t9 shown hereon ore per plOt.
u'1ies$ otnerwise noled
5. Dimensions ore in 'eet and decimalS
t;'"eof.
6 Certificale of ovtno'italion LB 4J
7. R/w represents Right-ol-Way.
B P.O.B. repre-,erHs P('lint 01 BetjinnirU~.
9 P.O.C. rep'esents Point of Commencement.
10 O.R. r'.lp~l!Ise"h; Official Rlcords,
11 L.3,E. represef'lls Landscope Burrer
Easemenl
12. U,E. repre~enls Utility Eo,,,men\.
13. ~.P.L.E. represllnts Florido Power & LiQn\
Eosement
14 DE. repraee,,!s DroinaQ8 Eosemel"ll.
1~ S.L reprc!>enls Sidewolk Easement.
15. P.U.[, rllpresenh; Publi~ Utility Eo:;emllfll.
~-
v...-.
II-{"~~
THE FIRM)
B~ADlEY
FlA ll:;. NO. tD9C
NOT VALID WI1HDUi THE 31GNArURE AND THE
OR:CINAl RArSED SeAL OF A FLOR:DA LICENSED
SURvEYOR AND MAP"'ER
This hI NOT a Survey,
E. _V!!.~!!.1!!!lC:' I
~,::'sou-:~;':~--'I;~i~~--rj I
'0.0. '''' - """ "''''"'''''''''0'", :~:"o-:_:=~=:J
RESOLUTION NO. 2008- ~
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF FEE SIMPlE AND/OR
THOSE PERPETUAL OR TEMPORARY EASEMENT INTERESTS NECESSARY
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIX LANING AND ASSOCIATED
IMPROVEMENTS TO COLLIER BOULEVARD FROM SOUTH OF DAVIS
BOULEY ARD TO GOLDEN GATE MAIr\ CANAL. (PROJECT NO. 60001).
WHEREAS, the Board of County COmrrusslOners (Board), on February 23, 1999,
adopted Ordinance No. 99~ 14 therem establishmg the CapItal Improvement Element of the
Growth Management Plan m order tu establish pnontlcs for the design. acqUlSItlon and
00)(0
DO'"
~D_
NO
o .0
z~~
E~OJ
OJOJ'"
_..0(1)
- ED-
(1) OJ
-0"
C OJ
~o
<>:
construction of the various capital Improvement projects; and
WHEREAS, the CapItal Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan IS
amended annually to Identify public facilities reqUIred dunng the next five years; and
WHEREAS, the TransportatIOn Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan was
adopted In Ordinance No. 89-05, and ,amended most recently In Ordinance No. 07-80; and
WHEREAS, the wIdenmg of Collier Boulevard from south of DaVIS Boulevard to Golden
Gate Mam Canal (Project No. 60001) is one of the capIlallmprovemem projects reqmred under
the TransportatIOn Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the locatIOn for the constructIOn of the proposed nnprovements has been
fIx.ed by survey and IS collectIvely represented by the legal descnptJons compnsmg ExhibIt "A"
attached hereto and incorporated herem; and
WHEREAS, after consideratIOn of the availability of alternate routes and ]ocatlOns, the
comparatIve costs of the project alternatIves, various lmpacts upon the envlfonment, long range
planning options, and public safety conSIderatIOns, the Board deSIres to exerCise Its nght to
condemn property for public purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COUTER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that It has been detennmcd by the
Board that the cxpanslOn of Collier Boulevard from south of DaVIS Boulevard to Golden Gate
Mam Canal (heremafter referred to as "the Project") 15 necessary and in the public's best mterest
In order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the CItizens of Collier County.
A.l\ffi IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that Cons[rw.:tton of the Project IS an mtegral part of
the County's long range plannmg effort, and IS mcluded m the TransportatIon Element of the
0"''''
00'"
~o~
.N 0
o '..,.-
Z~..-
E~'"
","'''''
_.r:""
-En.
ro",
Uu
J;Q)
0,0
<(
CounWs ComprehensIve Plan for Gro....'~~ -~t~r;::iE,.":"
de .;'~,,,\d by the Flonda Department
of Commumty Affairs.
AND IT IS RJRTHER RESOLVELJ that the County Staff has reVIewed alternatlve
locatIons for the Project, and the costs assocIated wlth the deSIgn, property nghts acquisitlon, and
constructIOn of the project, as well as public safety and welfare consIderations assocIated WIth
the deSign and constructIOn of the Project, and vanous Impacts to the envIronment, and the
B03i'd finds that after consIderauon of these issues, the most feasible JocatlOns for construction
of the proposed Improvements IS collectIvely represented by the legaJ descnptlOTIS compnsmg
ExhibIt "Au attached hereto and Incorporated herem.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED Ihat 10 order to construcl the Project as deSIgned, It
IS necessary for the Board to acqwre vanous real property interests described in Exhibit "A".
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED Ihat all property shall be put to public pUlposes.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the County staff and Office of the County
Attorney are hereby authonzed and directed to Immediately acqUIre by gift, purchase or
condemnatIOn III accordance WIth the proVIsions of Chapters 73, 74 and 127, Flonda Statutes, the
real property Illterests more particularly described m EXhibit "A," attached hereto and
Incorporated herem.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that no mobile homes are located on the property
sought La be acqUired and therefore It will not be necessary to remove any mobile homes from
the property to be acqUIred.
ThIS ResoJullOn, adopted on thIS J 4-T(i" day of TU.,u.c
, 2008. after motIOn.
second and maJonty vote.
A TrEST: . ..
DWIGBTE. !jiR0CK, CLERK
.rc:f~.i.A'('~.L.O ~ By: TOM HENNING, CHAIRM
A~n,,~~... l
.t~~l",..,
",J;;'[;-l::;i'.':','"
Approved as to form and
Je;jiY .sufficlency:
~ V(L./.~"
Ellen T. Chadwell
Asslstant County Attorney
-Page 2-
OO)r..D
OOL.(";'
..--.~o
o 'N
Z~~
r-, J)
CQ)O)
Q)~, ro
::::::-eo....
OJ a;
-ou
C ill
QJ .-,
a:L...I
<l:
gg: \
s<C~
c.)(r'- \
~~~ \
CLD;:Q.
30
~\ PARCEL
_ 'v'1.-G
L' I NOcrl~'59.E
pos ~- 50.00.
L Nae'4.j.'O:;p"W 'SECTION 35
DAYISOOUlEVARD~o.-67'- SECTION ""2
poc ,
LlNE TABLE
UNE LENGTH BEARING
11 20.00 N89'44'Ol"W
'..2 22,49 N49'2 '32"[
LJ 15.00 S1f13'06"E
I
I
I I
[JI'~I
~N
D I I
'-'1-
WI~ I
U~
E;:J.. I
rl~' !
ucci'
_QI
~r: II
I I :
! ! I
ql~~____I_1
--- c--- +1
... : -- T\/j
~._~~-~ II~
r
I
I
I
~CQ
S:g~
~,.",
~Q~
Wo
3ill~
0.",,-
50
SECTION 34
SECT JON 3
4
N
r;.-
Q 2S 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE
I
,,,
S., RANGE 26 E..
~orcel 109 FEE
FEE SI/.jfPlE
INTEREST
~
~
~
~
r;
I I
~
'"
c;>
5 V) I
~w
'"
C;~
>
ili ~ I
:r ~ I
w
:J
-"
o
u
121
~I
"
w.
'"
151
~i
iJj
'"
~I
o
o
Z
I
to'? FEE.
PARCEL 109 Fe:E
A portion of Section 34, Township 49 South,
RanqB 26 East, Callier County, Florido, Aiso
being 0 portion or those lands described in
Official Records Book (}99, Page 1723 0' the
Public .~ecords of Collier County, Florida. Being
mo:e particularly described as follows:
Commencing ot the southeast corner 01 Secti::1I1
34, Township 49 501..1:1"1, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida; thence North 89'44'01" West
clong the South line of said Section 34, a
distance or , 00.67 lest; thence Nor!"
O:'1~'59" tu:sl, 0 distance or 50.00 feet to
lhe sO'Jtheosl COr.'1er 01 (hose IOi'lds described
irl Olficlol Records Book 599, p0ge 172:3 of
the PubJi.:: Records of Collier County, Florida,
SOle' pall'll olso being the ir.tersectior, or the
Norlholght_ot_woy line ai DOYIS BOUleYord and
the West right-at_way line at CoWer BouleYord
ana the POiNT OF BEGINNING;
thence North 139'44'01" West along the North
rlght-ot-way IiDe at soia Davis Boule yard and
the Soulherly bOUndary line or described lor.ds,
o dislonc.. or 20.00 leet, thence North
49'25'32" East, 0 distance or 22.49 leet lo a
point on the West flght-Ol-way line or said
Collier Boulevord ond the eoslerly boundary iine
or said described lands; thence South 11'13'06"
E:ost along said West r;ghl-of-woy line and
eOSterly bo~ndary iine, a distance 01 15.00
leet to the POINT OF BEG~NNING.
Sontolnl.'),; 1/.7.07 square feet, more 1)( less.
EXHIBIT II
Do..... I of 11-
.---
NOTES:
1. Tnis IS not u surYey.
2. 30sis cr bearing :s the East line 01
Section 34, Township 495" Range 26E.. Collier
COUi'l!y, rlorlda, beino "" 00'29'29" W, F'Jorida
Stote Plane Coordinates NAD B3/90, East
Zone.
J, Subject to easements, reservations and
reslflctions of reCord.
4-. Ecsements shaw~ hereon are per plat,
l.'nless otherWise noted.
5. DimenSIons ore In leet and d~:::lmals
thereof.
6. Certificate ot aulhonz:ation L8 4J,
7 R/W represents Rignt-of-Woy.
8, P.O.B. represents ?oint ot Beginr,ing,
9, p,O.C. represents POint of Commencement.
10. O.R. reoreSents OffiCloi Records.
, 1. ;..,8.E, reoreser:ts Landscape Buffer
Eosemert,
12. U.i::.. reoresents Utility Easement.
13. F.P.~.E. represents Fioridn Power & Lighl
E;Jserr.ent.
14. D.E. represents Drainage Easement.
15. S.E. ref.)resents Sidewalk E:osement.
15, ?l,.E. represents Pi,lblic Utility Easement.
HY.l\T, p,S.
FLA. Lie. NO, 58.34
NOT VALID 'WJTrlOUT THE SIGNATURE: AND THE
ORIGINAl'RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
This is NOT a Survey.
WilsqnMiller _7.==-.
.........,av-..-.....,.".,..,.~~.Trirlw'll.,.,""*".....
WI.orMkor. in~,
""'''*'_....l<''.-........'''''''__,___,'''_ .__._
IPftO.I:cTHCk Iii-En 100000000lJCllXNo;
N8015-S0U-OOl i lC-4S
....
~,ov 2B. 2007 - 10'4J:J9 TOS80,~Nc.:IX\SUR\c"!ljer ~lvd\nI2MHil1\ jC-49\ lC-49-P122,dl'lg
OC1>CO
00""
~~o
o "C')
z~..--
E~'"
"'OJ
"'..0 CO
== Eo..
CO",
'0"
C '"
1;;0
-<
,
I
I
I
I
a"
z"
SU"}:g
a"'''
wO-
"ow
:sOlS{
Q.<ro.
30
-L
Porcel 10'1 TCf:
t5r-,1
~N
GJ.!.I
"
wv> I
""
f5O-1
::; "
::;00
o
"en
-Q.
If'} _"
'"
/
~
(I
co
m
~ (/)1
Uw
~'"
a:;;
>
-' 3: I
Ol,
"''''
w
::J
-'
o
U
I
I
I
I
I
~---~ ~-:n
'-___I_
I I
I
\
//)
L~_______l
~I
~
m
c.
~I
0\
0", \
~O'l,..,
-'''"
"'~ \
~g.~ \
Q.<rCL
50
'A''''~\
I 09 TcJ:. [;
- - L I "'""'SO", }
POB ~!5000'
SECTJON J~ _ L_~4fQl"~ SECTION ~
SECTION .3 DAV!S BOULEVARD 12061 SECTION 2
eo,
'<
'"
~I
b
o
z
4
N
-----rrEMPORARY
CONST~UCTltlN E~SEMENT
DURA1"ION S YEARS.
I I
~-
o 25 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE
Wi/_Miller -===...
""""'.&--..~......"...lotdot,o.~'II"""'tooa-....
1\'bOllMhr",A1a.
--........I<4.-->IJ::ll..mo,___."'A>""_.__....
J
'"
LINE TABLE
LENGTH BEARiNG
7.65 NB9'44'Ol"W
31.08 N49026'32"r
5.74 511'1.3'06"[
22.49 S49'26'32"W
LINE
11
l2
l3
L4
.., ...,
lC-4S
"""""'... IIUT
NB015-S0U-OGl
EXHIBIT A
Page ~ of (l
--
PARCEL I09icE
A portion of Section 34, ,owns hip 49
South, RClige 28 Ecst. Collier County,
florida. Also being 0 portion oi those lands
described in Officiol Record5 Book 699, poge
1723 ot the PUblic Records of Co~lier
County, Florida. Being more particularly
described os follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner SecUOn
.34, Township 49 South, Ronge 26 Eost,
Collier County, Florida; thence North
89'44'01" Weet 010n9 the South line of said
Section ..34, a distance 01 120.67 ieet;
ther\ce North 00'15'59" East, a distance 01
50.00 leet to 0 point on the North
right-at-way line or Dovis Boulevard soid
paIr'>! also lying on the South line 0' those
Iimd5 described In Official Records 80ak
699, page 'i723 01 the Public Records 01
Collier County, Florido, also being the POINT
OF BEGINNING; thence Nortl'l 69.44'01" West
olong the North righI-aT-way line at said
DaVIS Boulevard and the southerly boundery
line of SOld d€"scribsd Jands, 0 distance 01
7.65 ieet; thence North 49'26'32" East, a
distance ::It 31.06 leet to 0 point on the
""est right-ot-way line or CoWer Boulevard
and the easterlv boundory line or seid
described lands; thence South 11'1..3'06"
Eosl along Said Wesl r;ghl-ot-woy line and
said easterly boundary line, Q distonoeO!
5.74 leet; thence South 49"26'32" Wes!, 0
distance or 22.49 leet to Ihe POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Conte:nlng 133.99 square feet, more or less.
NOTES;
1. This IS flot 0 survey.
2. BOSls of bearing is the East line Of
Section 34, Township 49S., Range 26E., Collier
County, Florida, being N 00'29'29" W, Florida
State Plone Coordinates NAD 83/90, East
Zone.
3. Subject to easemerHs, reservations and
restnctions ot record.
4. Easements shown hereon ore per plat,
unless otherWIse noted.
5. DimenSions are in teet and declr'T",ols
thereof.
6. Certificote or outhonzatiof'J La 43.
7. R/W represents Right-ol-Woy.
6. P.Q.B. represents POlllt at Seginning.
9. p.O.C. represents Point at Commencement.
10. O.R. represents Officlol Records,
11. LB.E. represents Landscape Buffer
Easement.
12. U.E, represents Utility Easement.
1 J. F.P.L.E. represents Florida Power & light
Easement.
i4. D.E. represents Drolno,"e Easement
15. S.E. represents Sidewalk Easement.
'16. p.U.[, represents PUblic Utility Easement.
fiI~tS~R THE FIRM)
FLA. lIC. NO. 5834
NOT VAUO WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE
ORIGINAL RA!SED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
This IS NOT a Survey.
-"""...
lC-411
"'"
Nov 2/j. 20::17 - 10'44,51 TOseORNEIJ(:\SUR\colliec blvd\CH2~rlill\ IC-49\ lC-49-P722,l1wg
00"0
OOl{)
~O_
.N 0
o ..".
Z~..--
~~(ll
C(ll'"
(ll.o",
'::::-~o....
"'iD
'0,-,
C (ll
i'i,o
<r:
",I
CO
z
ii'
~I
o
'"
'"
~I
"
m
N
~I
SE::C nON 34
SECTION .3
(
Parcel (to FEE
..TOllGATE d~' ~MERC;AL
. CENTER ~ y.;E :;WO
\P.!:3. 18,. ::0. 2,.;-24)
I"
I'
:1:
'I:
7.5' D.l:.--:J...h-
11-7.5, D,L
IIOF"'E' I I
en
m
I
"U>
'-'W
~"
~~
~,.
m,
"'"
w
::J
~
o
'-'
<,
589'4.3'032"( 155..:16'
TR....CT:,
PARCEL
SIl9'~6't2"W 1!l5.16'PMl
SECTION 35
SECTION 2
DAVIS BOULEVARD
-~~
I
I
I
I
II
i.V
-'-
TRACT 6
,
'"I"
~~
::J~
,,~
~o
m
(
I
I
1
.1
~
4
N
: LINE
l1
L2
LINE TABLE
LENGTH BEARING
14.25 N45'46'06"W
8.98 500'03'48"[
PARCEL 110 FEE
FEE SIMPLE
INTEREST
A portion oi Tract 5, Tollgate Commercial
Center Phase Two, as recorded In Plot
Book 18, pages 2.3-24 of the PUblic
Records of Collier County, Florida, Being
more particularly described as tOllows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of said
Tract 5 said point also lYing on the North
rrght-ot-way line of Davis Boulevard;
thence South 89'56'12" West along the
South line of said Tract 5 and said North
flght~ot-woy line, a distance of 155.15
feet to C pOint on the southwest line or
sOld Tract 5 said pomt also lying on the
northeasterly right-of-way lir.e of said
DaVIS Boulevard; thence North 45'46'06"
West along sOld southwest line and sOld
northeasterly rlght-of-woy line, C distance
of 14.25 feet; thence South 89'4.3'.32"
East. a distance of 165..36 feet to :J
pOint on the East lil'1e of SOld Troct 5;
lhen::::e South 00'0.3'48" East along soid
East line, 0 distance of 6.98 feet b the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Contolning 1,514.38 square feed, more or
less.
S., RANGE 26 E.,
""'''''
lC-49
.... I
o ~ ~ lOll 200
G8(H'BlT A
Page20f-E::..
NOTES:
1. This is r.ot a survey,
2. Basis of bearing IS the East line 01
Section 34, Township 49S., Range 26E., CaJIier
County, Florida being I\' 00'29'29" W, Florida
State Plane Coordinates NAD 83/90, Easi
Zone.
J. Sublect to eaSements, reservations and
'estrlclions of record.
4. Cosoments shawn hereon ore per plot,
unless ot.'"1erwise noted.
5. DimenSions ore In teet and decimals
inereo:.
6. Certificcte at authorization La 43.
7 R/W represents Right-or-Way.
8. p.O.B. represents Palnl or 8egin.1ing.
9. P.O,C. represents POint at Commencement,
10. O.R. reoresents Official Records.
11 L.B.::. represents Landscape 8uffer
Easement.
12. U.E. represents Utility E:Jsement.
13. f.P.l.E. represents Fiorida Power & Light
Easen;enL
14. D.E. represer.ts Drainage Easement.
15. S,E. represents Sidewalk Easement,
'j 6. P,U.E. represenis Public Utility Eosemelit.
, p.S.
5634
NOT VALID ITHOUi THE SIGNATURE AND THE
ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
ThlB is NOT a Survey,
Wil_Miller -==>-.
_.&,;r..,.'~............,~_.l>~...."""""""
WhoMllot-.il~.
--_....~._.......--.:w._ ~'.... ,.,.._........ ...._._
......"... -.
N6015-S0L'-OOI
-"""'...
lC-49
....
No. 28. 2007 - 10:4;):5J TOSSORNElx:\su,~\collier bl.ci\CH2Iv1Hill\ \C-4S\ lC-49-P1D.dwg
o 0)<"
00"'
~~o
o -L[)
z~..-
E~(])
(])(])O)
_.0'"
-"0..
"'-
u(])
C '-'
(])(])
0)0
~
",I
"
z
"'
""
~I
o
'"
~.
~I
N
'"
N
~I
SECTiON J4
SECTION .3
(
Parcel IIOTcE.
TOLLGATE dJ~.i MERCIAL
Gr;~7::R PtfSE lW()
(PB ,8, Prn 13-24)
TAA", 1:::
7.50'0.E.----,1
~7.50'O.E.
PQn:~1 !torCe 'I
S '<13' 17.52' ,
155..J6'
~
U1
'"
I
0:",
'-'w
:~
>
~'"
OJ"
0:0:
w
::J
~
o
'-'
I
I
I I"Q I
I &~ I
I ~~ I
TRACT 5 ~o
~ ~a:: I
I
I
"
eo,
-poc
SECTiON 35
SECTION 2
DAVIS BOULEVARD
POC
A
EXHIBIT
Page~of~
LINE
11
L2
L3
LINE TABLE
LENGTH BEARING
8.98 NO. 3'48"W
7.20 N4.5'46'06"w
5.00 SOO'0.3'48"E
N
1.-
o 25 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE
I
'"
PARCEL
IlOTc.E
NOTES;
1. This 15 not 0 survey.
A portion of Tract 5, Tollgate Commercial Center
Phase Two, os recorded in Plot 800k 18, pages
2.3-24 of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida. Being more particularly described os
folJows:
2, BasIS of bearing IS the East line oi
Section 34, Township 495., Range 26E., Collier
County, Flonda, being N 00'29'29" W, Florida
State Plol'e Coordir'lates NAD B3/90, Eost
Zone,
Commencmg at the southeast corner said Tract
5: thence Narth 00'03'48" West olang the East
line at said Tract 5. 0 distance 01 8.98 teet to
the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 89'43'32"
West, a distance ot 155.36 teet to a point on
the southwest line of said Tract 5 said point
also lying on the northeasterly rlght-oF-woy line
of Dovis Boulevard; thence North 45'46'06" West
along said southwest Bne and sQld northeasterly
right-at-way line, 0 distance of 7,20 ieet;
tnence South 89'43'32" East, 0 distance ot
170.52 feet to 0 point on the East line 01 said
Tract 5; thence South 00'03'48" East along said
East line, a distance of 5.00 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING,
J. Subject to eosements, reservations and
restnctions of record.
4. Easements shown hereon are per plot,
unless otherWise noted.
5. DimenSions ore in teet and dec!mals
thereof.
6. Certificate of authorization LB 43.
7. R/W represents Right-ol-Way.
8. P,D.B. represents Point 01 Beginning.
9. P.D.C. represents Point 01 Commencement.
10. O.R. represents Officio I Records.
11. L,B.E. represents Landscape Suffer
Easement.
12. U.E. represent:;; Utility Easement.
1 J, F.P.l.E. represents Florida Power & Light
Easement.
14. D.E. represents Drainage Easement,
15. S.E. represents Sidewalk Easement.
16. P,U,E. represents Pubiic Utility t:asemenl.
ContQlning 839.71 :square teet. more or less.
TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
DURATION :s: YEARS.
(FOR THE FIRM)
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE
ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A ~LORIOA LICENSED
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
This 1S NOT a Survey,
Wi/_Miller ~="""-.
- -"~'-"-"'~-'~~MII
1I1I~..m
lIW_~....n..,.,...__,__,,,,"__,____
.., !U:
1C-49
- ... IHIEr
N!lO 15-SQU-OO 1
-""",...
1C-49
"""
New 28, 2007 - 10'45:09 TOSBORNEiX:\SUR\eoUier t>IVd\GH2MHill\lC-~9\1C_49_P72J'~Yl9
0"''''
00"'
~o_
.N 0
o -'"
Z"'~
~ ~ 0
COOl
2..oro
-CD..
('0-
'015
C '"
gj,c
<:
I
~
"
z
'"
~I
o
~
in
~I
N
0,
N
o
o
z
(
Porcel
c"
'"
I
"'",
u'"
........er
5:~
~'"
OJ"
"''''
'"
::J
~
o
u
I
I
"~
TRII,CT5
SECTION 35
-SE.CTION 2
DAVIS BOULEVARD
1',1
FoE
EXHtE!LT A
Page~ Of~ (
,
b
~!~
S'~
615
~g
!
'1
TOLLGATE c~. M.ERCIAL
CENTER P E TWO
(P.b. lB, P . LJ-24)
I!
.,
ill
I!
7.5'O,E.-i
I
II
1
TRAC16
~
--I:)' D,E.
I
_1
PARCEl '1\
;~,)IJ -
,
119'4:5' -[105.21'
SIlV5&'1?'W 105.16'
~-
4
N
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH! 8S4RING
L i 8.9S NOO'OJ'4 "w
L2 8.35 SQO'16'28"W
PARCEL 'I i 1 FE
FEE SIMPLE
INTEREST
A portion of Tract 6, Tollgate CommerCial
Center Phose Two, os recorded in Plot
Sook 18. pages 23-24 of the Public
Records of Collier County, Flonda. Being
more particularly described as follows;
Beginning at the southwest corner of said
Tract 6; thence North 00.03'48" West
along the west line of sOld Tract 6, 0
distance of 8.98 feet; thence South
89"4.3'32" East, Q distance of 105.21
feet; thence South 00"16'28" West, :J
distance of 8.36 feet to 0 pOint on Ihe
south line of said Troct 6 said pOint O!SO
iYlng ot') ~he North right-of-way line of
said Davis Boulevard; thence South
89"56'12" Vvest along said South line, 0
distance of 105.16 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Containing 911.75 square feet, more or
less.
01;iO/OB
... ""
ie-ill
~-
o 25 ~ 100
GRAPHIC SCALE
I
'00
NOTES:
This ~s 'lot Q survey.
2. BaSIS of beanng IS the Eost line 01
Sec:ion 34. ;ownship 495., Range 26E., Collier
County. Florida, being N Ocr29'29" W, -"Iorida
State Plane Coordinates NAD 83/90, East
Zone.
], Subiect 10 easements. reservations and
restrictions 01 record.
4 Easements shown hereon ore per plot,
unless otherWise noted.
5. DimensJons ore 1:'1 leet ano deCimals
thereof.
6 Certificate at authorization LB 43.
7. RjW represents Right-Dr-Way.
8. P.O,B. represents Pomt ot BegiMlng.
9. P,O.C. represents Fomt 01 Commencement.
1 C, O.R. represents OfficlOl Records
11 l.B.E. rep(ese~ts Landscape Buffer
Ecseme.'lt.
. 2. U,E. represer:ts Ulility Easement.
:J. F.P.L..E. represents Florida Power & Light
::osemenL
14. o.E. represents Drainage EcsemerH,
1:S, S.E. represems Sidewalk Easement.
15. ?,LJ,E. represents Public Utility Ecsement.
IT, (FOR THE j;"IRM)
"LA. ~IC. N 5 34
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE
ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FlORtDA LICENSED
SJRVEYOR AND MAPPER
ThiS is NOT a Survey.
E.,
Wil.Miller -===-.
1'IoIPn.~.~............~_.~~
_.k<
--............-""""..........--.""'__.w_..._....
-.x:r ... .....
N6015-S0U-OOI t11 FEEOll' X
....
--...
lC-49
Jon 10, 2008 :.;:5312 TCS80"N~lx,\SUR\oolli6c blvd\CH2MHill\ \<::-49\ IC-49-PI24.<l'<<9
00)(0
00U1
~O_
.N 0
o "r...
ZU1~
E:: Q.J
(])(])'"
_..oro
-;:::0..
ro -
'01.5
c 1>
i'j,o
<r:
",I (
C)
z
"' ~
<(
,", "'
~I '"
I
" "'",
'" Uw
~-
Vi '"
~I g~
-'.,
CD"
N "''''
'" W
N :J
" -'
?II 0
U
DAViS BOULEVARD
POC
Porcel 111 TeE
TOLLGATE d~kMERCIAL
C~f';i~."I' ~E TWO
(F2. ; c, pM~' 23-24)
11
i I
7.50' :J,E:.-i
TRACT 5
SECTION 35
-SECTION 2
LINE
Ll
L2
LJ
l4
l5
LINE TABLE
LENGTH BEARING
8.98 NOO'03'4B"W
5.00 NOO'03'4. "w
13.36 SOO'16'28"W
5.00 NB9"4,3'32"W
8.36 NOcr16'28"E
PARCEL 111 TCE
A portion of Tract 6, Tollgate Commerclol
Center Phose Two, os recorded In Plot Book
18, pages 2.3-24 0/ the Public Records of
Collier County, Florida, Being more particularly
described os follows:
Commencing at the southwest corner of said
Tract 6; thence North OQ"O.3'48~ West aiang the
West line of said Tract 6, a distance of 8.98
feet to the POINT OF 8EGINNING; thence
continumg along said West line North 00'03'48"
West, 0 distance of 5.00 leet; thence South
89'43'32" East, a distance of 110.24 feet;
thence South 00'16'28" West, G distance 01
13.36 leet to 0 pOint on the South line of
said Tract 6 said point also lying on the North
nght-ol-way line of DaVIS Boulevard: thence
North 89' 43' 32" West along said South line and
said North right.-ol-way line, 0 distance of
5.00 feet; thence North ocr 16'28" East, a
distance of 8.35 teet: thence North 89'43'.32"
West, a distance of 105.21 leet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
Contalnmg 592,94 square teet, more or less.
TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
DURATION :s YEARS.
EX~JaIT A
Page \\ b~ I:t.
I
I
I
TFlACj6
w"
~!1i
,\"
-w
Woo
;?fj5
"
PQrClll111TCE
N
....
o 2~ ~o IOQ
GRAPHIC SCALE
I
'""
NOTES:
1. This IS not a survey.
2. BaSIS at beanng is the East line 01
Section 34, Township 495" Range 26E., Collier
County. Florida, being N 00'29'29" W. Florida
State Plane Coordinates NAD 83/90. East
Zone.
3. Sublect to easements. reservations and
restnctions of record.
4. Eosements shown hereon are per plot,
unless otherWise noted.
5. Dimensions are in feet end decimals
thereot.
6. Certificate at outh::lrIzation LB 43.
7, R/W represents Right-at-Way.
8. P,O.B. represents Pamt ot Beginnmg.
9. p,O.C_ represents Pam! o~ Commencement.
10. Q.R. r'epresents Officiol Records.
11. L.B.E. represer"its Landscape Buffer
Easement.
12. U.E. represents Utility Easement.
i 3, F,P.l.E. represents Fiorido Power & Light
Easement.
'14. D.E. represents Drainage Eosement.
15. S.E. represents Sidewolk Eosement.
16. P.U.E. represents Public Utility Eosement.
:i5cJ
DAVID J. HYAT . P.. FOR THE FIRM)
FLA. Lie. NO. 83
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE
ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
IN DESCRIPTION 01/10/08
... .....
lC-49
This IS NOT a Survey.
Wil"iller -"",=-...
-'~''''''''Mo,.n......",..MNo,;;o.~",,__
IfbllN.llclr.hc.
_-,.......lIll..............._.__.""'.._,___.....
-.", "'" ...,.
N6015-SQU-OOl III TCEOf' X
IIlVl
-"""""'"
IC-49
Jon 10, 2008 - 13,57;45 ToSeORNiC[X:\SUR\,olli"r bIVd\CH2N1Hill\lC-49\lC_49_P724d",'l
O(J)<D
oocn
~o_
.N 0
o .CO
Z~..--
E~aJ
aJaJOJ
_.oro
-:;::0...
ro-
",aJ
_U
ill (ll
010
~
Porcel 112 FEE
UNPLATIED LAND
OR. BOOK 2797
PAGE 3287
co
~
"
"
w
'"
~
o
MAGNOliA POND DRIVE
co
1~
iPOB 1m
S89'JQ'J9"W :::
-106:"00'--( ~
i: N
\g
'2
"
Parcel 1 12 FEE
~l
~ I
8
z
/
/
!
~
~
~
en
I
"'0;
Uw
-",
3~
~~
ZN
""'~
~NO
8;sn
1=Ow
sm~
9;ciQ..
So
lai~
c:cr
w
::J
o
U
!)
I~
i,// I
I
FEE SIMPLE
INTEREST
poc
SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF ~.
SECTION 34 t
SECTION 3~ SECT:~N 35
I
1 SECTION 35
PARCEL 1 12 FEE
SECTION 34
A Portion 01 Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 Easl, Collier County,
FLorida. Also being 0 portion of tho~e lands described in Officlol Records
Book 2825. poge 3107 of th1'! Public Records 01 Collier County, Florida.
Being more particularly described os tollows'
Commencing at the southeast corner at the northeost Quarter carrer or
said Seetio., 34; thence Nortl". 00'29'21" West along the EcstHle 01 SOld
Section 34, a distance a! 1,352.49 feet: tnence South 89'.30'.39" West, G
distance ot 1 00.00 ~eel 10 the ,ntersect;:>n of the West right-at-way line
a~ Collier Boulevard and Ine South right-at-way line of Magnolia Pond Orive
also being the northeast corner at soid described lands and the PQIN, OF
BEGINNING, thence South OO'29'21~ Ecst olong said West rlght-oT-way line
and the easterly boundarly line or soid described lands, 0 distance or 17.39
feet: thence continUing along soid West nght-oi-way tine ond soid eoslerly
bounoary line South 04'43'.31" West, 0 distance 01 307.93 'eel; thence
North 00'29'26" West. 0 distor.ce of 323. i 7 leet to 0 poin~ c.~ the South
rlght-ot-woy iine at said Mognolio Fone Drive and the northerly :)ounaory
line or said described londs: thence North 67'42'52~ Eosl o:cng SOld South
r,ght-ot-wOY line and said northerly boundary line, 0 distance 0: 28.01
teet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 4,765.64 squace teet, more or less.
R[V.1 RE\lISED TO CHANGE PARCEL NAME AND DESCRIPTION TYPOS
CH2MHILL
SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL 112 FEE
A PORTION OF
SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 S.. RANGE 26 E..
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
TASlC CODE: DRAWN BV: ctIKED BT:
GCSoo TMO DJH
01/10/08
LINE TA.B:"E
U~~ LENGTH BEA,~ING
L1 i7,39 500'29' 1"E
L2 28,01 N87'42'52"E
A
EXHIBIT
Page 7 of 12.
--
4
3M
'.;-
o 2!1!10 100
GRAPHIC SCALE
'00
\jOTES:
;his IS ,10\ a surlley,
2. 80g,s 0: bear:ng IS the Easl line of
Sectio(1 34, Towr,ship 495., Range 26E.,
Co,iier County. Florida, being r-,. 00'29'21" W,
Florida Stale Plane Coordinates NAD 83/90,
Eos\ Zone.
-'. SL:blect to easemer'1ts, reservations and
restric:ions Of record.
4. Easements shown hereon ore per ptot,
unicss otherWise noted.
5. DimenSions ore In teet and Decimals
thereat.
6 Certilicate 01 oulhonzotion L8 43,
7. R/W represents Right-at-Woy.
S P.O,B. reoresents POI."!t at Begi;ming,
9 p.O.:=:, re?reseds ;Joln\ of
Commencement,
1 G. Q,R. represe~ts OfficlOl Recor-ds.
11. L,B.E. represents Landscape Bl.;ffer
Ease.'Tlent.
12. U.E. represents U:ility Ecseme."1t.
1.3. F.P.l.E. represents Florida Powe, & Light
t::cserren:
14. D,L represents Drainage Easement.
" 5. S.~:, cepresenls Siaewolk Easement.
'6, P,U.E. represents Public Utility Easement.
Pl
(FOR THE FIR~/)
DAVie J. HY "
FLA, UC, N 5834
NOT VALID WITi10UT THE SIGNATURE AND THE
ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA l':CENSED
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
This LS NOT a Survey.
Wi_Miller -""'=-=...
-.~,-.,...Moorn'I-...,.._,~~
-,,,"
PRO.IECT HO:
N6015-SQU-OOt
_Mr....m.___,-._,...._.___
SHEET DRAWING IHOD: NO:
112 FEEOF' X lC-49
.....
J~n 10, :<008 - 14,08,07 T;JSeORNE!X,\SUR\colI;or t>IVd\CH2MHill\lC-4g\lC-49_P',25.0wg
UNPLATTED LAND
O.R. BOOK 2797
PAGE .3287
~
MAGNOLIA POND DRIVE
L3
Porcel 112 TCE
~
0
q
z ~I
0"'''' ~
00"' 1;\
~O_
NO .
o ~O')
Z~,..... ,
,
,,~<!J .
-<!J0l
2..om
- ECL
l'l<!J Don
u() ZN
C ep 5ro~
"'0 NO
01 Q;:.c';:'
<! ~o
f:O~
:5oo:;.? N
<L '<L ~
Z'"
=>0
TEMPORARY I
ONSTRUCTION EASE~E
DURATION S' YEA S.
Parcel 112 TeE
en
co
l~
"'
~
0
POB I~
S89'JO'39"W ~
-16D:"Oo'--r ~
.I~/'
~I
. I
~ --
~I
,
on
'"
I
"'",
Uw
~ii'
~~
,'a53:
I "-
ia::ll:::
w
co
<5
U
I
PO:::;
SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF
SECTION 34
SECTION
PARCEL 112 TCE
SECTION 35
SECTION 35
A Portion at Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Callier County, Florida.
Also being 0 portiol'l ot those lands described in Officlol Records Soak 2825, page
3107 at the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Being mora porlicu:arly
described os tallows:
Commencing at the sOl,ltheost corner 01 the northeast quarter corner at soid Section
34; thence North OO'29'21n West along the East line of said Section 34, 0 distance
at i,352.49 leet; thence South 89'.30'39" W"'st, 0 distance of 100.00 teet ~o the
ontersection at the West right-of-way line 01. COllier Boulevard and the South
nght-of-woy line 01 Mognolio Pond Drive Said point olso being the northeast corner
01 said described londs; thence South B7'42'52" West along said South rl<ghl-ot-woy
line and the northerly boundory line ot SOld described lands, 0 distance Of 28.01
feet lo the POINT OF BEGINNING:
thence SOl,lth 00'29'26" East, 0 distance ot J2J. i 7 teet to 0 poinl 0(\ the Wesl
nghl-ot-woy line 01 Collier Boulevard said point also lying on lhe easterly boundary
line or said described lands: thence South 04'4.3'31~ West along said West
right-or-way line and said easterly boundary line, a distance or 55.00 teet; thence
North 00'29'26" West, 0 distance 01 377.78 teet to 0 point on the South
right-at-way line Of said Magnolia Pond Drive said point also t)'lng on northerly
boundary line at said described toMs; thence North 8742'52" East along soid South
right-aI-way line and said northerly boundary line, 0 distonce or 5.00 leet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Contomlng i,752.38 sqL.iOre I",et, more or less.
REV,l REVISED TO CHANGE PARCEL NAME AND DESCRIPTION TYPOS
CH2MHIll
SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL 112 TCE
A PORTION OF
SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 S., RANGE 26 E.,
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
TASK CXIDE: [)RA,WN 1m CHkED BYl CAD F1lE:
GCSOO TMO DJH lC-49
01/10/08
EXHIBIT A
Page g> of /"-
--
r-
LINE
LI
L2
L3
LINE ~ABlE
LENGTH BEARING
28.01 557'42' 2"W
55.00 304' 3'31"W
5.00 N8""42'52~E
N
..- I
o ~ ~ 100 ~
GRAPHIC SCALE
NOT::S:
I. This IS not a survey.
2. 60sis ot bearing os the East line at
Section 34, Township 495., Range 26E., Collier
County. florida, being f\' 00'29'29" W, Florida
Stole Plone Coordinates NAD 83/90, Eost
Zone.
3. Suoject to eosemer"lts, reservations and
restnctions oi record.
4, [oi!lements s~own hereon ore per plot,
unless otherWise nOced.
5. DimenSions ore 0(\ teet or.o dl'lcnr.ols
thereo!.
6. Cert:licate at authorization L8 43.
7, R/W represents Right-Ol-Woy.
8. ;".0.8. represents Point at Beginning.
9. P.O.C. represents Point 01
COmrnencement
10. O.R. represef'lts OfficIO I Records.
11. L.B.E. represents Landscape Suffer
Eosemen:.
12. U.E. represents Utili\y Easement.
13. F.P.L.:::. represents Florida Power & Light
[osement.
14. C.E. represents Drainage Easement.
:5. S.L represents Sidewalk Easement.
\6. P.U.E. represenls PUblic Utility Easement.
DAVID J. HYATT P.S. THE FIRM)
L.A. LlC. NO, 534
NOT VAliD WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE
ORICINAl RAISED SEA_ OF A FLORIDA LICENSED
SURVEYOR ANO MAPPER
Thla 18 NOT a Survey,
Wil.Mlller -.",.............
-'~'~'~'~w-...~~
-'"
-..........-".,.---.--."" "",-.---
"""""''''''
N6015-SDU-OOt
SHEEr
112 TCEOF X
Jon 10, 2008 - 14:47:19 TOS60~NEIX:\SUR\coltier bIVd\CIi2l11.H;II\IC-49\lC-4g_P7ZS.d",'l
DRr\WlNQ INDEX NO:
lC-49
"'"
OO)r..D
OO<D
~O_
.N 0
o '0
Z<DN
E..... ill
","'0>
_.ool
- En.
ol",
"u
c '"
~O
-<
SECTION 27
S:;:CTlON 34
~ L3 S.a-;OO~~4'
L1
z
o
~
rn
~
.
"
o
"
.
e
LINE
L'
L2
LJ
LINE TABLE
LENGTH BEARING
7.38 500'29'21"[
14.22 Nag'07'O 1" [
7.21 N89'30'39"(
ON
:?~....
0,.
0.'
~8:
:S[l)~
~o:Q..
00
FEE SIMPLE
INTEREST
4
N
MAGNOLIA POND
12 ,
t~
;/
z/
all
~/
~ //
~j
. .
/
'1.:
~.' //
/
/,
/;
,
5.
o
~
~ 8
. N
.
~ ~
o
,,/
/
//
/
;/
l< ,4.- /
ro':"""}" /-j
"i.~ /,///
~I< "//f//
..::: /// //
SBT42'52"W
DRIVE 75.54'
~F1J..E:
lC-4-9
pac
FEE
PARCEL' 13 FEE
Parcel
',: 3
,
A portion ot Section 34, Township 49 South,
Ronge 26 Eost, Collier County, Florida. AlsO being
o portion Of lhose lands describec in OfficIO I
Records Sook 2797, page 3287 01 the Public
Records ot COllier County, norido. Being mo~e
porti::::.Jlarly descrioed as rollows'
P08
SECTIO"N--26
., -
SEr'!-~_Y'--'
!
CommenCing at tre northeast corner a~ SOld
Section 34; thence South 87'54'38" West olo:1g
the North line ot soid Section 34, a distance af
100.04 ~eet to a oaint on the West right-ai-way
line or Collier BOulevard soia pOIr\l also being the
nor:heast corner 01 $ojd described lands: thence
SOuth 00'29'21" East along said West
r.gh:-ol-wcy line and the easterly bouncory line
01 saic described lands, 0 distan<;e 01 7.38 teet
to the POINT OF 8E:GINNI.~G, thence r,Q'lli('luing
along sojd West right-aI-way line one the
easterly boundary line or said described lands
South 00'29'21" East a distance at 1,269.65 leet
to the ..ltersection Of said West ngl-it-Ol-woy line
end the North right-of-way line at Magnolia Pond
Dnve SOld point also being the southeasterly
corner or scio described lands; thence South
87'42'52" West along the North r,g,t-at-way line
or SOld Magnolia Qr.ve and the southerly boulldcry
line Of SOld described lands, 0 distance at 75.54
leel; thence North 44'30'.34" East, 0 distance or
78. i 4 leet: thence ~or:h 00'48'07" West, 0
distance 01 354,58 teet; then<;e Nortr, 89'O7'Ol~
East. 0 d:~lonce ot ',4.22 leet: thence North
00'25'02" West, 0 dislon<;e 01 552,'0 teet; thence
North 00"28'38" We~t, 0 distance at 309,98 teet;
thence "'orth 89'30'.39" East, a distance o~ 7.21
reel to tile POINT OF 8!::GINNING.
I
EXHIBIT JiL
pai~li~
Li:-=-=
C:TYCATE
--~[Vb:-'N:-
/
II"
/
I
,
I
P:lrce1113 FEE
COl1u;llnmg 16,.532.91
mare or :!::ss.
squar~ feel or 0,3795 c<;res,
,..
o 2!1 50
'",
M
m
.
~
I~
10':
Wi<
~"
cia:::
>.
-, 0
I:R
w
CJ
~
o
u
~
"",
5'
i s;:'V
w~
~ ~ J. Sublect to ea:lements, reservations end
ii -' restrictions Df record.
~
; I :i-rn- 4 Easements shown hereon Clre per plol,
' 8 S t..nless otherWise noted,
'00
GRAPH,C SCALE
NOTES:
1. This IS not c survey.
z
o
2 B:Jsls at beormg IS the East line 01
Section 34, TownShip 495., Range 26E., Collier
County, Florida, being N 00'29'29" W, Florida
Stote Plone CO:Jrdinotes NAD 83/90, Eost
Zone.
w
"
"
5. Dimensions are .n teet and decimais
thereof.
"
u
II
~
6. Certificate at outnorization LB 43.
I. R/W re;,.resents Right~ot-Woy.
E. p 0.8. represents Pomt ot Beginning.
9. P.O.C. ~epresents POint of Commencement.
10. O.R, represents OffiCIO: Records.
I 11 :"'8.E, represents Landscape Buffer
:--~~Eosement,
I 12. :"".E. represents Uliiity case."Tl~'ll.
i 3. F,p.L_:::. represents Flomlo Power & Light
Eosemen~.
14 D.E. represents Drainage E05emen;,
15. S,E, represents Sidewalk Easement
16. P.U.E, represents Public Utility Easement.
"
o
v.
in
I~
~
o
o
z
,
I
r
H,
FLA. LIC. 58
NOT VA.LlD WITHOUT TI-IE SIGNATURE Ai\D THE
ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA liCENSED
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
(FOR THE FIRM)
----I
,
,
AND DESCRIPTION TYPOS 01/,0/oe
'This is NOT a Survey.
26 E..
Wi/.Mlller -""'==-.
_......-..................,..UPIdICIpo_.~-
-,"<
-....--.",.---....--.....-.---
PftoJEcT NO:
N6DI5-SQU-OOl
s_
113 FEEOf' X
DMwt40 INDEX NO:
lC-49
ROO
JD~. 10, 2~08 - 14;45:')1 lCSBORNqX:\Si...'R\collier blvd\CH2!.',HIi\\lC-4'''1C-4g_PI2E>.dw9
0"'(0
00'"
~O_
NO
OU'""i"-
Z~N
E>-Q.l
<1> <1> OJ
_.0'"
-:;=D...
"'-
"0<1>
_ u
~ <1>
g;o
<(
SECTION 27
SECTION 34
llNE
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
LINE TABLE
LENGTH BEARING
7.:7 $02'05'22"E
14,22 Sa9'07'Ol"W
7.30 SB7'42'52"W
15.00 N8S"S2'4.3"E
16.87 N89'34'S8" E
Percel 113 TCE
O~
>;f!.!r-
,~o
ea~
"O~
:sco~
~tin.
00
TEMPORARY
NSTRUCTtON EASE
URA TlON :.? YEA
~
~
i
z
o
q
~
~
ci
~
"
.
.
rn
~
.
"
poc ~ Parcel
107.~?~"_\ I
S.E~4':'~
LI I
POB
113 TeE
,
0[1<-1';::;-;:'-;:''''--
---=-=.r ."'" -=-~_
SEtTIOH :i:i
1- r- ---
I I
I
,
E1HIB!T I I A
Pqge~ 6fl.L1..
I I I
lL
m
8-
~
~
l;i
~
I
'"
10 s
~,
0'"
>.
~o
(00
N
I:;)
.~
~
o
o
N
,~
--1'. ,,*,-
i."JQ~ ."J"'.
-<:! r.:,"" \>~":>~:"
13
MAGNOUA POND DRIVE
~
~
~
~J
.
cil
~
~
l:
.
~
~
I
1m
o
,
~
~
I;
.m
~
IE
N
rn
8
I'
'1: REV.1 REVISED TO CHANGE PARCEL NAME AND DESC~IPTION TYPOS
CH2MH1LL
SKE'lCH & DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL 113 TCE
A PORTION OF
SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 S., RANGE 26 E.,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
TASl( CODE: DRAWN BY: CHKtD B't:
GCSOO TMO Dm
a
q
~
~
.
"
.
~
w
CITY GATE
1-8Lvti.-~K -
~T~
I
I
I
~
I
~
~
"~
~
.,
~"
z
~rn
Vo
~.
v
.-
~.
.
>.
8s
~
<
o
i:.
u
I
I
I
I
Ii
I
I
~c~
, I
I
I
01/10/08
PARCEL 113 Tes
A portion or Secbon 34, Township 49 South,
Aonge 25 East, Coliier County, florida, Also
being 0 portion at those lands described In
Official Records Book 2797, poge J287 at the
Po.,blic Records 01 Collier County, Florido. Being
,nore particularly described 0$ lollows;
Commenci1g at the northeost corner or soid
~ectian 34; thence South 87'54'38" West olong
(he North line ot soid Section 34, 0 distance
01 107.45 leet; thence South 02.05'22" Eost, 0
distance or 7.17 teet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING;
thence Soulh 00.28'38" East, a distance 01
309.98 teet; thence SO;,Jth 00'25'02" Eost, (J
distanca Of 552,10 leet; thence South 89'07'01"
West, 0 distance 01 14.22 ieet; thence Sowth
00.48'07" East, a distance ot 354,58 leel;
thence South 44'30'34" West, 0 distance at
78.14 feet to a pOint on the North
ngr.t-ol-wc;y line at Magnolia Pond Drive so,d
point olso Iving on t.'1e southerly boundary line
oT soid described lands; thence South 87.42'52"
West along SOI(l North fight-of-way line erid
:<oid southecly boundary line, a distance of 7.30
feet; thence North 44'30'34" East, 0 distance
of 63,.37 teet; thence North CO'29'18" West, 0
distance ot 185.91 leet; thence North 01'07'17"
West, (I distance of 195.01 teet: thence North
BB'52'4.3" Eosl, 0 distance 01 15,00 teet:
thence North 00.25'02" West. 0 distance ot
840,3B teet; thence North 89"34'58" East, 0
distance 01 16.87 teet to the POINT 0"
AEGINNING,
Contoinlng 21,580.73 squore teet or 0.4954
acres> more or less.
--
a 25 so 100
GRAPHiC SCALE
'00
NOTC:S;
1 This IS not 0 survey,
"
z
o
2. BaStS at bearing is the East line at
Section 34, Township 49$" Range 26E.,
Collillr County, Florida, being N 00"29'21"
W. Florida State Plane Coordinates NAD
9.3/90, East Zone,
.3, Subject to easements, reservations
and r~stnclions at record.
4. Easements shown hereon ore per plat,
unless otherw;se noted.
5. DimenSions cre w, teet ana declma:s
thereat,
o. Certificate 01 outhonzatiof'l LB 43,
7, R/W represenis Right-ot-Way,
S, P.O.B. represents POInt at Beginning
9. P,Q.C. represents Point Of
ComMencement,
10. O.R. represents Officiol RecordS.
11. L,9.E, represents Lar1dscape Buffer
::asement.
i2. 'J,:::, "epresenls Utility Easement.
iJ i_o.!....E. represents FlOrida Power &
Light t:osement.
i 4, D.E. re-presents Drainage Easement.
15, S.E. represems Siaewalk Easement.
16, F',U.E. represents Public Utility
Easement.
, P,. (FOR THE FJRM)
FLA. Lie, NO. 583
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATJRE AND THE
ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
ThIS is NOT a Survey,
W/~/lIef .....",==:...
~.~.a:...,..".........~_.~~
_.h<
PRO.JECT NOT
N6015-S0U-OOl
SHEET
113 TCEOF X
____D......__.__."'~.___
R!V:
NQ IND!X NO;
lC-49
Jon 10.2008 - 14:21,53 TOSBORNE-IX:\SUR\collier bIYd\CH2MHill\lC-49\lC-4S_rnl>.<l..."
om",
00"'
~o~
.N 0
o 'N
Z~N
E~(!)
(!)(!)'"
_.0'"
- :=0...
"'-
D(!)
r"
- (!)
1:;,0
<{
I
I
SECTl~7
SECTION 134
I
+
I oocL 114 DE
~ NON-cxClU8lVE
~~
O~
zm
<f'-r---
-'NIX)
C'><::~
WO
~OW
SffiS?
~a:::n.
=>0
N
,,!!
I~
"
'"
"
z
12
<;
w
en
~
o
'~
Porcel 114 DE
~IB(T A
~..JL of-S-...
,
-{
I
1
1
1
POB
L1
r
~ N
I
L31
1
SECTION 26
SECTION 35
l
L-
en
0'>
I
'"
U"
~"
a'"
>.
20' C~-E j
r
o
-
':JoG
cr,Q:<
.;.. ,~~
_'P_
. '"
~ ;;"
fA lIJ@
C;'"
m DC;
I 7'"
~rrlq
r
o
N
I 1
-I ,2' UE.
~
I
1
I
i
/:
1/1
i I
0IllFllE<
lC-49
~
'"
'I N
.0
10
z
CITY GAE
8l\lD.~-
'"
is
W
Ul
<
~
'- .-"
1-
~~
:0",
(l,"
~J Q
U .
s:;;
"
~m
8~
LL'
;;:
"
~
u
PARCEL 114 DE
A portior of Lot 2, C:\y Gote COmmerce
Center Pr.Qse One, P,at Book 41, poges 6-7
at the Public Records ot Codier County,
Floriaa, Also being c porlion at Section 35,
Township 49 Sou~h. R~nge 25 Easl, Collier
CO\Jnly, florida. Being more particularly
described os follows:
Beginning at !he northwest corner ot soid
~o: 2, thence North 89"30'55" East olorlg the
North rne at said Lot 2, a distance at 22.00
teet; Thence 'eavlng said North line South
0(;29'21" E:lst, a distance or 32.09 teet;
Thence South 69.30'34" West, 0 distance of
22.00 leel ~o 0 pOint on the Eost
rlght-ot-way line a: Collier 8a:.Jleva'd; Tnence
North 00.29'2," West along said East
rigl':!-o:-woy I:":l, c ::jistonce 01 32.09 leal
to the POINT OF BEGINt>.ING.
Containing 706 square leet ar 0.0162 acres,
more 0' less.
LINE TABLt..
liNE LENGTH BEARING
l1 22.00 N89'30'55"[
L2 32.09 SOO'29'21"[
U 22.00 S89' 30' 34" W
,4 32.09 N00'29'21"W
,..
o 2~ ~ 100 200
GRAPHIC SCALE
NOES:
ThiS IS not;:: survey.
2 Bcs!s oi Deormg is the West litle of
Section 35, Township 49$" Range 26E.,
Collier County, Florida, bemg 1\' 00'29'21"
W, Florida Stale Plane Coordinates NAO
83/90, East Zone.
3. Sublect to easements, reservctions
and restnctions at record,
4 Easements shown hereon ore per plot,
unless otherWise noted.
5, Dime.".slons ore In teet ana deCimals
thereat.
G. Certificate 01 authOrization LB 43.
7 R/W represents Right-ot-Way.
8. PO,S, represents POint ot Beglnn:ng,
~ p,e.c. rep:esents Pomt or
'~cm~encemenc.
10. O.R. represents Offlcic~ Records.
1. L,6.E. represents Landscape Buflt:,-
:::cser:1ent.
12, LJ,::. represents Utility ::asement.
13, F,P,L.E. represents Flonda Power &:
Light Eosemer\t.
j I,. D.E, represents Drainage Easement.
15, CAE. represents Conal Access
::osement.
16. P.UL represents Puelic Utility
:.osement.
DAVID J. HY , TliE FIRM)
;:'..P.. L1~. N 5834
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE
ORIGINA,l RA,ISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA UCENSED
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
ThIS 1S NOT a Survey.
WII.MillBr _T.......=-.
~.~.~.~.~-,~~
-...
--...-....-.......--.--,....-.---
PM)JECT NO: SHEET
N5015-S0U-OOl 114 DE OF X
DAAWlNO INDEX NO:
JC-49
"""
feb 14. 200B - 10:)1 :46 rOSBORNElX:\SUR\coliie, blvd\CHZMHill\ IC-49\ lC-49-PI14-DE_<Iw,"
OOHD
00""
~~O
o -'"
Z~N
Ew~
$~cu
- ;:::0...
ro -
-oP
c --;
w,.92
cn~
<(
I
I
SEC"~~*7
SECTION 134
~l
par1el 115 DC
Percel 1 - 5 DE
EX~IB!T A
~2..t)f-.i..:!::..-
_ I-sECTioN 26 -- L
I SECTION 35
~ - --- T
I : 20' C.A.E.~
5
~
PE~~POB
I
1
O~ I~
zm '"
:sr--r-- "
N", ill
0'
o,,~ ~
'"0 I~
t=ow
:5ro~
<L '<L N
z~ 0
000 "
z
N
I~
~
<n
l
-,,"
~ ~~
-f> ;:;:j~
~_ ;:0 ~
'D
~~8
"''''",
'"",
mo,"
!z::O
,:::;rrJ:q
5
~
N
125'
I.
L.RE.
"'
m
I
'"
U"
~"
0'"
> -
"'0
mo
N
CH2MHlLL
SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL l15 DE
A PORTION OF LOT 1, CITY GATE COMMERCE
CENTER PHASE ONE, P.B. 41, PGS. 6-7
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
rAS!( CODE: DRAWN BY: CHKED BY: c;,o f11.E:
GCSOO TMO DJH lC-49
CITY GA:'T
i-----a[VD. N.
~~
)1
/ I:
( 1
-No,
N6015-S0U-OOt
w
z
o
u,
'"
'!'
<L_
~~
wi
';ow
W(I)
""
w<L
" .
~-
w~
'"
"'m
O<L
,,-
w
"
"
r:
G
PAReE:.. 115 DE
A portion at Lol I, City Gate Commerce
Center Phose One, Plot Book 41, poges
6-7 01 the Public Records 01 Coilier
CotJrlly, Florida. Also being 0 portion a:
Section 35, Township 49 South, ROr'lge 26
East, COllier Counly, F:orida, Being more
particularly described os tallows:
Beginning at the southwest corner or said
Lot i, thence ,'lorth 00'29'21" West along
the East right-af-way line 01 Collier
8ol,Jlevord, 0 distance of .38.19 feet: ther'lce
Ie:ovlng sO;d Eost flgnt-of-way line North
89.30'34" East. a distance Of 22.00 feet;
Thence South 00'29'21" East, 0 distance 01
.38.19 feel to 0 point on the South line or
said Lot I; Thence South 89.30'55" West
olong soio South line. C (.I,stance 01 22.00
I""et to 0 point on Said Ecst righi-at-way
line and the POINT OF Bt:GINNtNG.
Containing 840 square teet or 0.0193 acres.
more or less,
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARiNG
L 1 22.00 N89'30'34" E
L2 38.19 SOO'29'21" E
L3 22.00 S89'30'55"w
LL 3819 NOO'29'21"W
~
o 25 50 100 200
GRAPHIC SCALE
NOTES:
I. This IS not a survey,
2 Basis at bearing IS the West line
Of Sect;or'l 35, Township 493., Range
26E., Coilier County, Florida. being N
OC'29'21" W, Florida Stole Plane
Coordinates NAD 83/90, East Zone.
J. Suoiect to easements, reservations
arid restrictions or record,
4. Easements showr, hereOn ore per
pbt, L.'niess otherWise noted.
5. DimenSions ore In ~eet and
decilTJo,'s thereot.
6. Certificate at oulhoiizatiDn LB 43,
7 R/W represents Right-ot-Way.
S. P.O.B. represents POint at
Beginning.
9. P.O.C, represents Pornt of
Commencement.
rOo O.R. represents OffiCial Records.
11. L.B.E. represents Landscape Buffer
Eosement.
12. U. E, represents Utility Eo"ernenl.
i 3. F.P,L..E. represents Florida Power &
Light Easement.
14, D.E. re,oresents Dramage Easement.
j 5. CAE. represents Conal Access
Easement.
16. P.U.E. represents Public Utility
Easement.
P.S.M. OR THE FIRM)
FlA, lie. NO. 834
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE
ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA !.ICENsm
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
This IS NOT a Survey.
WI/.,Miller -===:...
_.~.--.~........._.~~
I'IfIctnlAo:hc.
!Ii<ET
115 DE OF X
>m...,....._.llll.""""'_-...,__.""_.__
.or.
DMWlNC INDEX NOl
lC-49
F~b 1+.2008 - 09:28:27 TOS8aR~Elx:\SUR\c(:dlicr bfvd\CH2MHil:\lC-<l9\IC_49_P115_1lt.<lwg
Agenda Item No. 10D
December 15, 2009
Page 24 of 56
Technical Memorandum
Collier Boulevard (CR 951)
From Davis Boulevard (SR 84)
To Main Golden Gate Canal
Prepared for
Collier County, Florida
Right of Way Acquisition Department
Revised June 7, 2008
Prepared by
" CH2MHILL
-
Agenda Item No. 10D
December 15, 2009
Page 25 of 56
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................1
2. Proj ect Description ...................................... ................................................................ ............... 1
3. Need For Transportation Improvements ...............................................................................1
4. Existing Conditions.....................................................................................................m..'......... 4
4.1 Collier Boulevard....... ...... ......... ..... ......... ....... .... ...................... ..... .... .... ....... ....... .... .............. 4
4.2 Beck Boulevard ..................................................................................................................... 4
4.3 Intersections..................................................................................................................... ...... 4
5. Evaluation Factors .....................................................................m.............................................. 7
5.1 Alternate Alignments...... ........... ............................... ................... .............................. .......... 7
5.2 Safety Factors ......................................................................................................................10
5.3 Long Range Planning Factors ...........................................................................................10
5.4 Envirorunental Factors .......................................................................................................10
5.5 Costs .............................................................................................................................. ....... 10
6. Summary Of Proposed Improvements.................................................................................11
6.1 Collier Boulevard ....... .... ........ ................ ............. ........ ......................................... .... .... ... ....11
6.2 Beck Boulevard ...................................................................................................................11
6.3 Intersections................................................................................................................... ...... 11
7. T raffle Analysis..................... ................ .................................................................................... 13
Figures
Figure 1-1 Project Limits .............. ......... ........... ...... ..................... ............... ..... ...... .................. ......... 2
Figure 1-2 Current Project(s) Location Map .................................................................................3
Figure 3-1 Current Land Use ..........................................................................................................5
Figure 3-2 Future Land Use ............................................................................................................6
Tables
Table 7-1 Signalized Intersection LOS/Delay Comparison ...................................................14
Appendices
A Intersection Layout
COLLIER BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
DAVISIBECK BOULEVARDS TO GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
JUNE 7, 200B
1
Agenda Item No. 10D
December 15, 2009
Page 26 of 56
1. Introduction
Collier County has initiated a roadway improvement project to widen approximately 1.1
miles of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) from Davis Boulevard (SR 84)/Beck Boulevard to Main
Golden Gate Canal, in Collier County, Florida (Figure 1-1).
The specific purpose of the project is to enhance mobility and develop a traffic circulation
plan for the local system connection to the primary facilities of Collier Boulevard (CR951)
and 1-75 that promotes safe local traffic, bicycle and pedestrian movements. The intent of
the project is to provide adeguate transportation capacity to meet future traffic development
and planned growth as approved in the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
This project shall address cost, environmental impacts, permitability, current and future
development patterns. In addition, this project is part of an overall corridor improvement
program Collier County has undertaken to increase capacity along Collier Boulevard from
US 41 to Immokalee Road (CR 846). The other projects comprising the Collier Boulevard
corridor improvements are at various stages of completion. 111e section from US 41 to
Davis/Beck Boulevards (immediately south of this project) is under construction. The
section from Golden Gate Main Canal to Golden Gate Boulevard is in the 90% design phase.
The section from Golden Gate Boulevard tD Immokalee Road is under construction (Figure
1-2).
2. Project Description
The Collier County Transportation Department (County) proposes to widen Collier
Boulevard from Davis/Beck Boulevards to Golden Gate Main Canal, a distance of
approximately 1.1 miles. The existing road is a four-lane, divided, rural-arterial highway.
The proposed project will widen Collier Boulevard to a six-lane, divided, urban-arterial
highway with a continuous auxiliary lane along each direction of travel between
Davis/Beck Boulevards and City Gate Boulevard. Beck Boulevard will be widened from
two lanes to four lanes for a distance of 0.25 mile: the 1-75 NB exit ramp intersection with
Collier Boulevard will be realigned; and the City Gate Boulevard intersection with Collier
Boulevard will be realigned.
3. Need for Transportation Improvements
This project is being developed as a vital component to the regional transportation network
to accommodate existing and future residential and commercial growth in the area and
meet future traffic demands in Collier County. The southern portion of ColIier County has
seen significant development and growth in recent vcars, and continues to grow north and
south of the 1-75 interstate corridor. A 25% increase in population is projected for this area
of Collier County by 2015. All vacant land adjacent to this project has current development
underway or planned development activities within the next several years. This growth
presents major challenges to the Collier County network of arterials and collectors, and
prompted the reguired improvements to this vital north-south roadway connection to 1-75.
T-~
COLLIER BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
DAVIS/BECK BOULEVARDS TO GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
JUNE 7,2008
A
o 500 1000
L-----1..-.......---.......L_-.J
Scale in Feet
FIGURE 1.1
Project Limits
Collier Boulvard (CR 951)
Davis Boulevard to Main Golden Gate Canal CH2MHILL
North
L._
'- '.;::<.mL~.rrl.-,. . t~J;;"::"
r~,"-'~ . ~ ~~~:;. ~..,;::>~~.,.:'
_.,ll"....r{.
. . ~-~,~_: .;:.~~~1f; ,~-'
"..~I.lli ' ,,;,,1,11/,._-
f-r:::J' I '=' ~;.:: if'
.
Agenda Item No.1 OD
Daee:ff1ser 1 E, 2088
,,='-~K'r;;;:;-/tnm(H{"'ee Rd R 8 of 56
__..~"J~":ll, 1I;If:
TB052008001TPA 321624.5A.FP
I,
\311
@)
I
,
I
,
i
, i .~
-~1 ,-
,,--C'C, I.
"""".:- i.
I =-....~..
I " .
,f
I'
\'-'."', ""
i:L -.-
.
::-,;r-
~,~.":" .
>TI~(~H
~~-:~i'" .......,
f~'Ef;} (t~,
,...~.,...-..'
':1~~;:~' }. r~~
......,.
f~>:~~
-."'" [' -'''1',,-.-,
~~... :v _~~~~i ':::-1
~jf
I},
'I.....'.
'i.L---
r-c;]
,-------J l :
.!'r='. ,.I...,........
-~ .. j~-_:.
-.- ,
("'~! PROJECT(S)
LOCATION
-C:-i~:.~.~i:';:[....
. ,
-:0-:/..:,
.:::Y_.L,___'
'~:':'}~'~-\
, ,,/
Under
Construction
i
"
\,
i.......
Ui',
\\! '\
'~!' "
';tt~,
~ '.- '-----. . ,
~,)~>>. ...---; I
~r',,~ '--.
~J!'~~;1 .
COLLIER
COUNTY
"---
A
FIGURE 1-2
Current Project(s) Location Map
Collier Boulvard (CR 951)
Davis Boulevard to Main Golden Gate Canal CH2MHILL
North
Agenda Item No. 10D
December 15, 2009
Page 29 of 56
Figures 3-1 and 3-2 show current and future land use for the property adjacent to the
project.
Collier Boulevard provides a continuous connection between Marco Island to the south and
Immokalee Road to the north. As such, the roadway provides direct access to 1-75 for a
large portion of the County's residents. Currently, this portion of Collier Boulevard creates
3 b0ttleneck for traffic due to the lack of capacity in providing connections to 1-75.
Improvements to this portion of the roadway through the 1-75 interchange, as well as the
other portions of Collier Boulevard, will enhance regional mobility as well as hurricane
evacuation by adding increased capacity through the corridor.
4. Existing Conditions
4.1 Collier Boulevard
The existing Collier Boulevard roadway consists of four, 12-ft. travel lanes with a depressed
grassed median that varies between 12 and 23 ft. in width. The outside shoulder width is 12
ft. (six foot paved). There are traffic signals located at the intersections of Collier Boulevard
and Beck/Davis Boulevards; 1-75 5B entrance/ exit ramps; 1-75 NB entrance/ exit ramps; and
Utilities Drive. There is one non-signalized, fully directional intersection with City Gate
Boulevard.
The existing right-of-way width varies between 210 and 500 feet. L/ A right of way (right of
way that prohibits or limits access to tile roadway from adjacent property) extends from
Davis/Beck Boulevards on the south through the 1-75 interchange to Utility
Drive/Magnolia Pond Drive on the north. From Magnolia Pond Drive/ Utilities Drive to
Main Golden Gate canal, the right of way allows access to adjacent property.
4.2 Beck Boulevard
The existing Beck Boulevard roadway consists of two, undivided 12-ft travel lanes with
median left turn lanes. Beck Boulevard provides access to commercial industrial and
residential properties located between Collier Boulevard and 1-75. The existing roadway
right of way width varies between 100 and approximately 400 feet and allows access to the
adjacent property along the entire length of the road.
4.3 Intersections
There are five existing intersections along Collier Boulevard:
1, Beck/Davis Boulevard (Signalized)
Collier NB Approach (Currently under construction): 4 thru, 2-left turn, 1 right turn.
Collier 5B Approach: 2 thru, 1 left turn, 2 right turn.
Davis EB Approach: 1 thru/left, 1 left turn, 1 right turn.
Beck WB Approach: 1 thru, 1 left turn, 1 right turn.
4
COLLIER BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
DAVISlBECK BOULEVARDS TO GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
JUNE?,2008 .
A
C-3
C-4
CPUD
E
GC
I
MPUD
P
PUD
RMF(X)
RPUD
RSF(X)
Agriculture
Commercial - Intermediate
Commerical - General
Commercial Planned Unit Development
Estates
Golf Course
Industrial
Mixed Use Planned Unit Development
Public Use
Planned Unit Development
Residential Multi Family (Units per Acre)
Residential Planned Unit Development
Residential Single Family (Units per Acre
A
o 500 1000
L _ ._-1___. _ L____L__~
Scale in Feet
FIGURE 3.1
Current Land Use
Collier Boulvard (CR 951)
Davis Boulevard to Main Golden Gate Canal CH2MHILL
North
,,..<,,:-
North
I I I
Scale in Feet
FIGURE 3.2
Future Land Use
Collier Boulvard (CR 951)
Davis Boulevard to Main Golden Gate Canal CH2MHILL
A
o 500 1000
Agenda Item No. 10D
December 15, 2009
Page 32 of 56
2. 1-75 SB Entrance/Exit ramps (Signalized)
Collier NB Approach: 2 thru, single ramp connection to 1-75 SB (unsignalized).
Collier SB Approach: 2 thru, 1 left turn.
1-75 SB Exit: 1 left turn, 2 right turn.
1-75 SB Entrance: Single lane ramp.
3. 1-75 NB EntranrejExit ramps (Signalized)
Collier NB Approach: 2 thru, 2 left turn.
Collier SB Approach: 2 thru, single ramp connection to 1-75 NB (unsignalized).
1-75 NB Exit: lIef! turn (Signalized), 1 right turn (Free flow/merge).
1-75 SB Entrance: Dual lane ramp narrowing to a single lane approaching 1-75.
4. Utilities Drive/Magnolia Pond Drive (Signalized)
Collier NB Approach: 2 thru, I-left turn, 1 right turn.
Collier SB Approach: 2 thIu, 1 left turn, 1 right turn.
Magnolia Pond EB Approach: 1 left, 1 thru/righl.
Utilities WB Approach: 1 thru/left. 1 right turn.
5. City Gate Drive (Unsignalized - aT Intersection)
Collier NB Approach: 2 thru, 1 right turn.
Collier SB Approach: 2 thru, 1 left turn.
City Gate WB Approach: 1 left, 1 right turn.
5. Evaluation Factors
The following factors were considered prior to recommending the proposed improvements:
5.1 Alternate Alignments
Collier Boulevard: Collier Boulevard is an existing roadway within an existing right of way.
As such, design considerations were to keep any improvements within the existing right of
way to the greatest extent possible. Traffic analysis was performed by the FDOT as part of
their study to determine improvements to the Collier Boulevard/I-75 interchange. The
results of the FDOT study indicated that 8 lanes are required along Collier Boulevard
through the interchange to provide adequate capacity for traffic operation. In order to
provide the additional 4 lanes along Collier Boulevard, two possible aligrunents were
cons.idered - widening to the inside median and widening to the outside. Widening to the
median presented the following conditions:
. The median is not wide enough to add two lanes in each direction, requiring widening
to both the inside and the outside to accommodate the 8 lane section. Widening to both
sides increases the number of traffic control phases and increases the cost of
construction.
. Widening to the median required shifting the roadway aligrunent from inside to outside
several times to accommodate left turn lanes at the intersections and to avoid the
existing piers for the 1-75 bridge over Collier Boulevard, transforming the existing
straight roadway to a constantly transitioning alignment.
7
COLLIER BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
DAVISIBECK BOULEVARDS TO GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
JUNE 7,2008
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
December 15, 2009
Page 33 of 56
. Portions of the drainage swales would be impacted in the areas where widening to the
outside occurred and would require relocation outside the widening limits.
. Right of way would be required at the northwest comer of the Davis Boulevard
intersection to accommodate the right turn lanes from Collier Boulevard SB to Davis
Boulevard WB
. Right of way would be required along the west side of Collier Boulevard north of the
f,.unl' tv 1-75 NB. Lane widths would be reduced to 11 feet and the median width
reduced to be only wide enough to accommodate required turn lanes to minimize the
amount of right of way acquisition.
Widening strictly to the outside presented the following conditions:
. The alignment of Collier Boulevard remained a straight tangent.
. All drainage swales on the outside would be impacted and require relocation outside
the widening limits.
. Right of way would be required at the northwest comer of the Davis Boulevard
intersection to accommodate the right turn lanes from Collier Boulevard SB to Davis
Boulevard WB
. Right of way would be required along the west side of Collier Boulevard north of the
ramp to 1-75 NB. Lane widths would be reduced to 11 feet and the median width
reduced to be only wide enough to accommodate required turn lanes to minimize the
amount of right of way acquisition.
. Widening would be one contiguous strip, lowering construction costs.
Beck Boulevard: The FDOT is designing improvements to Davis Boulevard as a concurrent
project to the Collier Boulevard project. The FDOT is proposing 6 lanes across Davis
Boulevard at Collier Boulevard - 2 lanes westbound; 3 left turn lanes from Davis Boulevard
EB to Collier Boulevard NB; and one lane eastbound. This alignment on Davis Boulevard
was set given consideration to the location of the two gas stations in the northwest and
southwest corners of the intersection.
On Beck Boulevard, 2 lanes eastbound are required to accept the dual left turn lanes from
Collier Boulevard SB. Two lanes westbound are provided to match the laneage on Davis
Boulevard WB. Two scenarios were studied relating to left turn fanes and right turn lanes:
1. Dual left turn lanes from Beck Boulevard WB to Collier Boulevard SB and a single right
turn lane from Beck Boulevard WB to Collier Boufevard NB.
. Right of way would be required along the north side of Beck Boulevard for the
addition of the right turn lane.
. One of the ingress/ egress points for the businesses on the north side of Beck
Boulevard, west of Tollgate Boulevard, falls within the limits of the right turn lane.
Prudent access management practices dictate that ingress/ egress points on turn
lanes is to be avoided. These businesses also have access to and from Beck
Boulevard via Tollgate Boulevard.
2. Single left turn lane from Beck Boulevard WB to Collier Boulevard SB and no right turn
lane from Beck Boulevard WB to Collier Boulevard NB.
. No additional right of way would be required
8
COlliER BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
DAVIS/BECK BOULEVARDS TO GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
JUNE 7.2008
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
December 15, 2009
Page 34 of 56
. Ingress/egress point to the businesses north of beck Boulevard, west of Tollgate
Boulevard, does not conflict with any turn lanes.
Although the first scenario requires right of way, the traffic analysis shows that providing
the additional turn lanes allows more vehicles on Beck Boulevard through the intersection
with reduced signal phase timing, reducing the overall delay at the intersection by allowing
more green time to be assigned to the Collier Boulevard and Davis Boulevard signal phases.
1-75 Ramp Intersections: TIle configurations of the intersection between Collier Boulevard
and the 1-75 SB entrance ramp, the 1-75 SB exit ramp, and the 1-75 NB entrance ramp will
remain as exists and be modified only to accommodate the new curb line of Collier
Boulevard. 'Ibe configuration of the intersection between Collier Boulevard and the 1-75 NB
exit ramp was evaluated under the following scenarios:
1. Left turn through signal; right turn free flow (same as existing). Due to the close
proximity of the Utilities Drive/Magnolia Pond Drive intersection, this scenario requires
motorists exiting 1-75 NB to weave across 4 lanes on Collier Boulevard if they are
travelling to make a left onto Magnolia Pond Drive. This creates an unsafe condition.
2. Left and right turns controlled through signal. This scenario allows motorists travelling
to Magnolia Pond Drive to make the right turn and move to the left turn lane through a
protected signalized phase. An additional lane would be added to the exit ramp to
accommodate the stacking of the right turn vehicles at the signal.
Utilities Drive/Magnolia Pond Drive Intersection: Magnolia Pond Drive is to be widened
by the developer of the property on the west side of Cof1ier Boulevard north of the 1-75 NB
entrance ramp. The widened roadway will include 2 lanes westbound; one left turn lane
and one thru/right lane eastbound. For Utilities Drive, the following configurations were
studied:
1. 2 lanes eastbound; one left turn lane and one left/ thru/ right lane westbound (same as
existing).
2. 2 lanes eastbound; 3 left turn lanes and a thru/ right lane westbound.
. Additional lane accommodated in the existing median
. No additional right of way required.
3. 2 lanes eastbound; 2 left turn lanes, a thru lane and a right turn lane westbound.
. Requires widening and additional right of way along Utilities drive.
Traffic analysis indicated that the second scenario provided significant improvement over
the first scenario; however, the additional benefit of the third scenario did not warrant the
cost of the widening and right of way needed.
City Gate Drive North/Noah's Way: J\ioah's Way will be constructed by the developer of
the property on the west side of Collier Boulevard. Given this, two scenarios were studied:
1. Full signalized intersection. Traffic analysis indicated the due to the proximity of the
Utilities Drive/Magnolia Pond Drive intersection to the City Gate North/Noah's Way
intersection, both intersections could not be signalized. Since truck traffic from the
9
COLLIER BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
DAVIS/BECK BOULEVARDS TO GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
JUNE7,200B
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
December 15, 2009
Page 35 of 56
county landfill can utilize Utility Drive only, the Utility Drive intersection requires
signalization.
2. Directional intersection. Without signalization, a full open intersection on a six lane
roadway can not be accommodated. From Collier Boulevard NB, the intersection would
allow right in/ right out to City Gate Boulevard North and a directional left to Noah's
Way. From Collier Boulevard 5B, the intersection would allow right in/right out to
Noah's Way and a directional left to City Gate Drive.
No additional right of way is required along City Gate Drive North for either scenario.
5.2 Safety Factors
Construction of the widening along Collier Boulevard will increase the safety of the corridor
by improving traffic flow through the intersections. The addition of through lanes in
conjunction with lengthened left turn fanes will result in the elimination or reduction of
turning vehicles and through vehicles queuing in the through lanes and blocking the
through traffic. This will reduce the need for vehicles to change lanes and maneuver around
the queued traffic, resulting in fewer accidents.
5.3 Long Range Planning Factors
The widening of Collier Boufevard between Davis Boulevard and the Main Golden Gate
Canal is part of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2025 Long Range
Transportation Plan (LRTP). The 2025 LRTP was developed in 2000 and adopted in early
2001. This project is being developed as a vital component to the regional transportation
network to accommodate existing and future residential and commercial growth in U,e area
and meet future traffic demands in Collier County. Improvements to this portion of the
roadway through the 1-75 interchange, as well as the other portions of Collier Boulevard,
will enhance regional mobility as well as hurricane evacuation by adding increased capacity
through the corridor.
5.4 Environmental Factors
The Collier Boulevard widening project has been designed to limit the amount of
environmental disturbance as much as possible. No wetland areas are affected by this
project and all water quality treatment required is performed within the existing right of
way through the use of conventional ponds and linear ponds. Drainage swales filled by the
proposed construction will be replaced within the right of way beyond the widening.
5.5 Costs
Costs to provide the capacity improvements of this project have been carefully considered
in the analysis and design of this project. As the project has progressed through the design
and permitting process, the costs have become more defined and developed. The design
process only considers and includes those efements essential to the purpose of the project,
thereby maintaining the costs in the Capital Improvement Program and insuring a
financially feasible construction project. Current estimate of Probable Construction Cost
(60% Design Phase) is $18.5 M.
10
COLLIER BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
DAVIS/BECK BOULEVARDS TO GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
JUNE 7, 2008
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
December 15, 2009
Page 36 of 56
6. Summary of Proposed Improvements
6.1 Collier Boulevard
The proposed improvements include six 12-ft travel lanes from Davis/Beck Boulevards to
City Gate Boulevard/Noah's Way (proposed); one 12-ft auxiliary lane northbound and
southbound from Davis/Beck Boulevards to City Gate Boulevard/ Noah's Way (proposed);
and six l1-ft travel lanes from City Gate Boulevard/ Noah's Way (proposed) to across the
existing bridge spanning Main Golden Gate Canal. 4-ft. bike lanes and curb and gutter will
be included along the entire length of Collier Boulevard within the project limits. The
widening will mainly occur to the outside of the existing roadway pavement. Median width
in the final configuration will range between 10 feet and 40 feet.
The improvements will be accomplished mostly within the existing right of way with minor
property acquisition required from adjacent properties along the west side of the roadway
north of the 1-75 interchange.
Widening to the outside is proposed as it provides a better alignment, construction costs are
less than an inside widening, and right of way requirements were the same as an inside
widening.
6.2 Beck Boulevard
Beck Boulevard will be improved to contain four 12-ft. lanes for a distance of approximately
0.15 mi., then transitioning back to the existing two lane section. The total length of
improvements to Beck Boulevard is approximately 0.25 mi. Dual left turn lanes and a single
right turn lane are proposed at the intersection with Cullier Boulevard.
The improvements will be accomplished mostly within the existing right of way with minor
property acquisition required from adjacent properties along the north side of the roadway,
west of Tollgate Boulevard. In addition, due to the close proximity of ingress/ egress point
for these properties and its location within the limits of the proposed right turn lane, the
ingress/ egress point is proposed to he eliminated based upon prudent access management
practices relating to accidents between vehicles in the right turn lane and vehicles using the
ingress/ egress. Access to and from these businesses will be from existing access points on
Tollgate Boulevard and Tollhouse Drive. Minor circulation improvements within these
properties will be required to accommodate the elinunation of the access point on Beck
Boulevard
6.3 Intersections
The five existing intersections along Collier Boulevard will remain and be configured as
follows:
1. Beck/Davis Boulevard (Signalized)
Collier NB Approach (Currently under construction): 4 thru, 2-left turn, 1 right turn.
Collier 5B Approach: 3 thru. 2 left turn, 2 right turn.
Davis EB Approach: 1 thru, 3 left turn.
11
COLLIER BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
DAViS/BECK BOULEVARDS TO GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
JUNE 7, 2008
Agenda Item No. 10D
December 15, 2009
Page 37 of 56
Beck WB Approach: 2 thru, 2 left turn, 1 right tum.
2. 1-75 SB Entrance/Exit ramps (Signalized)
Collier NB Approach: 4 thru, single ramp connection to 1-75 SB (unsignalized).
Collier SB Approach: 4 thru, 1 left turn.
1-75 SB Exit: 1 left turn, 2 right turn.
1-75 SB Entropcp: Single lane ramp.
3. 1-75 NB Entrance/Exit ramps (Signalized)
Collier NB Approach: 4 thru, 2 left turn.
Collier SB Approach: 4 thru, single ramp connection to 1-75 NB (unsignalized).
1-75 NB Exit: 1 left turn (Signalized), 2 right turn (Signalized).
1-75 SB Entrance: Dual lane ramp narrowing to a single lane approaching 1-75.
4. Utilities Drive/Magnolia Pond Drive (Signalized)
Collier NB Approach: 4 thru, 2-left turn, 1 right turn.
Collier SB Approach: 4 thru, 2 left turn, 1 right turn.
Magnolia Pond EB Approach: 1 thrujright, lleft,.
Utilities WB Approach: 1 thru/right, 2 left turn.
5. City Gate Drive North/Noah's Way (Unsignalized - Directional)
Collier NB Approach: 3 thru, 1 left turn, 1 right turn (auxiliary lane drop).
Collier SB Approach: 3 thru, 1 right turn (auxiliary lane add).
City Gate WB Approach: 1 right turn.
Noah's Way EB Approach: 1 right turn.
In order to provide the greatest capacity for left turning vehicles on to the 1-75 NB and SB
entrance ramps, the length of the left turn lanes have been maximized within the available
median width.
The free flow/merge condition along the 1-75 NB exit ramp to Collier Boulevard NB has
been removed in the proposed condition. The traffic movement has been included within
the signalized intersection. Due to the addition of 2 through lanes on Collier Boulevard NB,
it was determined that maintaining the free flow/merge condition in close proximity to the
Magnolia Pond Drive left turn lanes created a short, unsafe weave across four lanes of traffic
for vehicles exiting 1-75 NB and desiring to travel west on Magnolia Pond Drive. Two right
turn lanes have been added through the signalized intersection in order to accommodate the
volume of traffic anticipated from 1-75 NB to Collier Boulevard NB.
Intersection operation and Levels of Service (LOS) for the proposed intersection
configurations are discussed in Section 7. Proposed geometry at the five intersections is
included in Appendix A.
12
COLLIER BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
DAVIS/BECK BOULEVARDS TO GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
JUNE?,2008
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
December 15, 2009
Page 38 of 56
7. Traffic Analysis
Traffic Analysis was performed to study the traffic operation along the Collier Boulevard
corridor as part of this project. The study limits include the five intersections along Collier
Boulevard and utilized SYNCHRO and HCS as the primarily tools for evaluation.
Two alternatives were considered in the analvsis:
1. No-Build Alternative: No changes to the existing geometry or capacity along Collier
Boulevard. The control type at the intersections along Collier Boulevard, with the
exception of City Gate Boulevard, will remain the same as existing. The existing full-
access non-signalized nT" intersection at the City Gate Boulevard will be converted to a
directional intersection with right-in/ right-out access to City Gate Boulevard and
Noah's Way along Collier Boulevard. Intersection lane configuration will be as
described in Section 4.3
2. Build Alternative: Intersection geometry/control at Collier Boulevard/City Gate
Boulevard/Noah's Way will remain as a directional intersection as in the No-Build
scenario. Collier Boulevard will be 8-lanes between Davis Blvd/Beck Blvd and City
Gate Blvd/Noah's Way. Intersection geometry will be improved at Davis Blvd/Beck
Road and Utilities Drive/Magnolia Pond Drive intersections. Intersection lane
configuration will be as described in Section 6.3.
SYNCHRO Analysis:
The SYNCIIRO analysis results for the two alternatives are summarized below and
included in Table 7-1:
No-Build: This alternative will result in long queue lengths and extended delays at all the
intersections in the corridor. All intersections will operate at LOS F with very high delays.
As shown in Table 7-1, the overall intersection delays (average per vehicle) will be:
. Collier Boulevard/Davis Blvd/Beck Blvd: 271 second delay
. Collier Boulevard/I-75 SB Off Ramps: 461 second delay
. Collier Boulevard/I-75 NB Off Ramps: 256 second delay
. Collier Boulevard/Utilities Drive/Magnolia Pond Drive: 836 second delay
Build Alternative 1: Proposed improvements along CR 951 and side streets will
significantly reduce delay at the signalized intersections in the corridor. The reduction in
delay is significant when compared to the No-Build scenario. The following is a summary of
the rcduction in delay at the signalized intersections compared to the No-Build scenario:
Collier Boulevard /Davis Blvd/Beck Blvd: Delay reduced from 271 seconds to 76 seconds
(195 second drop)
Collier Boulcvard /1-75 SB Off Ramps: Delay reduced from 461 see to 243 see (218 second
drop)
Collier Boulevard /Davis Blvd/Beck Blvd: Delay reduced from 256 sec to 103 sec (153
second drop)
13
COLLIER BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
DAVIS/BECK BOULEVARDS TO GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
JUNE 7,2008
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
December 15, 2009
Page 39 of 56
Collier Boulevard / Utilities Drive/Magnolia Pond Drive: Delay reduced from 836 see to
303 sec (533 second drop)
Although the added capacity provided by this project will improve the overall operation of
the roadway, none of the intersections under the Build Alternative will operate at LOS D or
better. The controlling factor to providing better level of service is the capacity and
configuration of the 1-75 interchange ramps, which is beyond the scope of the County and
this project. The PDOT is currently performing a study to determine the appropriate
improvements to the interchange that will provide the additional capacity to increase the
levels of service. The improvements proposed as part of this project have been coordinated
with the PDOT and can be incorporated into their intended interchange modifications. This
coordination, and the reduction in delays that this project provides, indicates that the
proposed improvements along Collier Boulevard will serve as an acceptable interim
improvement to the corridor and can form the basis of the potential ultimate improvements
that will provide operation at an acceptable level of service.
TABLE 7-1
Sianalized Intersection LOS/Delav ComDarison SYNCHRO Analvsis Results)
Intersection Approach/lnt NO BUILD 2030 BUILD 2030 Reduction in
Delay (see)
LOS/Delav (see) LOS/Delav (see) Compared to
Descriotion No Build
NB F /369 E /68 301
CR 951/Davis SB F /205 E 1 57 148
Blvd/Beck Blvd EB F 1311 F 1122 189
WB F 1142 F 1112 30
Intersection F /271 E 176 195
NB F 1601 F 1 314 287
CR 95111-75 SB SB F 1 245 F 1 81 164
Off-Ramp EB F /661 IEB Rinht\ F 1 459 (EB Riqht1 202
Intersection F /461 F /243 218
NB F 1 242 E/76 166
CR 95111-75 NB SB F 1 262 F 1 124 138
Off-Ramp WB F 1 366 IWB Left) F 1 203 (WB Left) 163
Intersection F 1 256 F 1 103 153
NB F 1 511 F /209 302
CR 9511Utilities SB F 1 376 F 1128 248
Drive/Magnolia EB F 1 334 F 1343 -9
Pond Drive WB F 11407 F 1 446 961
Intersection F 1 836 F 1303 533
NB NIA NIA NIA
CR 9511Citygate SB NIA NIA NIA
BlvdlNoah's Way EB NIA NIA NIA
(Unsignalized WB NIA NIA NIA
Intersection) --
Intersection NIA NIA NIA
14
COLLIER BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
DAVIS/BECK BOULEVARDS TO GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
JUNE 7,2008
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
December 15, 2009
Page 40 of 56
APPENDIX A
Intersection Layouts
'l'
Ii
>
l' - 1)
- ", ~
f
'" "- .-
en
~ "-
i(
106
It. . .~ f
t
~
,
L)Q)(Q
~L{)
.:..- -..\~
~ ":: Q)
m (j) Vi
~...f.)rc
mEn.
-0'"
c"
ill '"
enD
<{
---
;-:;r~&~~L~-;l~-\~~>' -
--....-...-.
__.._...._,,,,,,;;'i
114
t'
..
Ir
~ ~
~~
. ~
r t~
rr~
..-J
.f'8
~,~~q h
~'''" '
~ ~
r
~t,.t.t
I~
"
~r
.,-," "
f ;-
I
~
,f
!
a::
r"
r
r
Ie
"
~~
-
!
I
,
~;::l i
::;: I
~iOl~i
~~~!
"l ~ ~ !
5~~!
.. iOl ~'
~~....
::;: I
~ I
c::i '
\ ;0.:..
~ 'rf." +iOl 0/178 >ln8
~42'45'E I
\~
.
I~IP
~ ~
~ j
~ . <<'
~ ~, "
~ ~ ~ :j
II. :
~ 1i
00"0
00'"
~~o
o "N
Z~7
E~<D
<DIDg'
~~o..
"'-
'015
C <D
g;,0
<(
. I
I ~r
~ i
1 !, -..J
!~ I t~~
I, ~
"L' I' -..J
,-'.... C)
i, G
i j
I
I
i%
...:--~ 't&, ~
~, ,,,
"
\
\ \
\
,
~
,
!
o
~Ih
III
r ~ I
q, ~
f i! ~ is
I"! u
~; :
i '
fl
00"0
-oct)
~O
<0
:-... (1)
6~U)
......._ ro
-EO.
"' '"
Du
63 Q.l
(no
<(
.
,.
~S1 !
,
~
!
~ I
~ Ot: !
" t.:: :> ,
,,'l:!Si
:::: ~ t:: !
i '\.) ,
~ ~ ~
~ [,fj ;
~~'
~V;Ei
~ ~ b
.
~ ~ ~ ~
Ih
II' ~ ,
~ ~' ~
i ~:
2 ~ . ~
~ ~ 5
O(J)($)
00"'
~o~
.N 0
o .....
Z~~
E~"
""OJ
_.oro
-ED..
ro"
-0"
c "
~O
<l:
Pi
,..'
I
I
CO
~
cD
\l170N9\1W'
56
\ '
~
en
()')
~I'.;,,::I.
~~"'il
... '
"lp'
't-,
"':... \
,
--~ ------..0-,;- k~
;'\;Ic,'_,-".L
,~
..
F
~
1
"J~I"
--.,
'1:'c~4'~"+
57i
i
]1\/1:10 J-ll7/lln
-
--
1 '
i
I
,
,
'ft i~ I
I . .,'. I
, ..~ ~ I
"~;:j I
~ ~ ~ I
i ~ ~.
~~ ~~~
e ~ I
S
,
;11 ~
II' .1
: !h ~
:\.~II;;
:I -,
-~ il
::r:~l,I!1
"'.!..
", r
Nfl!.U
Z~W
U !!
I
OQ';<C
o9t.{)
'-:;-:'::;-'6
U)
-;t
;::.....~
~-9J;
~g~
c v
", Q)
-0
51
<.0
'I-
CD
"
~ ~ ~
"
r~
~
Ii
~:
if
~.. 8...'"
___ --"" "1I
l.) ---J:;:~ Ii
QJ ...n d
lI!i.!!!'
--S;ell"
NII!,l!
:Z:~ Iii
(,) !.
f
~
~
..It.~
t t t" '.,.
, II i ~
I" ·
. ~
I "I
- O~ ~'
II: :
~ 5
r
"
~-
"
.
.
Agenda Item NO.1 00
December 15, 2009
Page 46 of 56
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
CH2MHILL
Collier Blvd. Improvements
Davis Blvd. to Golden Gate Main Canal
Collier County Project No. 60092
Northwest Corner of the Collier BlvdjDavis Blvd
Intersection
PREPARED FOR:
Collier County Transportation Engineering and Construction
Management
PREPARED BY:
CH2M HILL
DATE:
December 4, 2009
INTRODUCTION/pURPOSE
The purpose of this Technical Memorandum is to evaluate alternative designs for
improvements at the northwest corner of the Collier Blvd/Davis Blvd Intersection (Parcel
109).
Collier County plans to widen Collier Blvd (SR/CR 951) between Davis Blvd. and Golden
Gate Main Canal from the existing 4-lanes to 6/8-Ianes. Within the roadway widening
project limits, the limited access section of Collier Blvd. from SR 84 (Davis Blvd/Beck Blvd)
in the south to Utilities Drive/Magnolia Pond Drive in the north (within the limits of the
interchange with 1-75) is classified as State Road 951 (SR 951). Collier Blvd. from Utilities
Drive/Magnolia Pond Drive in the south to Golden Gate Main Canal in the north is
classified as County Road 951 (CR 951).
Alternative analysis, Environmental Factors, Safety Considerations, Costs, and Long Range
Area Plans - were considered in conjunction with current engineering design standards.
EXISTING GEOMETRY
In the existing condition at this location (Figure 1), there are two right turn lanes from
Collier Blvd SB to Davis Blvd WE. Signing is present noting that trucks should use the left
most, or inside, turn lane only. Under the existing condition (Figure 2), a truck with a size
classification of WB-50 can turn in the inside right turn lane at the same time as a car turns
in the outside right turn lane.
ORIGINAL DESIGN - Project No. 60092
The original design prepared for this project maintained two right turn lanes from Collier
Blvd SB to Davis Blvd WB. Regulatory signing along the side of the roadway was included
requiring trucks to use the left most, or inside, turn lane only. The radius of the curb along
the outside edge of pavement was increased from 40' to 45' in order to allow a truck with a
size classification of WB-50 to turn in the inside right turn lane at the same time as a car
Agenda Item No. 10D
December 15, 2009
Collier Blvd. ImprdVil~1sof 56
Davis Blvd. to Golden Gate Main Canal
County Project 60092
Northwest corner of the Collier BlvdjDavis Blvd Intersection
turns in the outside right turn lane, thereby replicating the existing condition (Figure 3). In
order to construct the new curb and sidewalk, acquisition of right of way was required and
obtained by the County in the form of a fee taking of approximately 147 SF and a temporary
construction easement of approximately 134 SF. This design does not have any impact on
the width of the easterly driveway opening (exit only) for the gas station.
ALTERNATIVES
After review and consultation with the FDOT concerning the design at this location, the
FDOT allowed a reduction in the width of the travel lanes on Collier Blvd. from 12' to 1}' to
allow additional flexibility in the design process. Utilizing the allowance to reduce lane
widths to 1}', three alternatives to the original design were evaluated as described below:
Alternative 1 - Truck size classification WB 62 turning with a passenger vehicle utilizing
a 15' inside right turn lane, a 12' outside right turn lane and a 45' radius.
Utilizing a WB 62 design vehicle restricted to a 15' inside right turn lane, a passenger vehicle
in a 12' outside right turn lane and a 45' radius along the curb return will allow both
vehicles to make the turn simultaneously based upon analysis utilizing Autoturn software
(Figure 4). TIlis alternative maintains the right of way acquisition requirements, curb return
geometry and signal pole location proposed in the original design. Enhanced regulatory
signing (black letters on a white background) over the roadway and along the side of the
roadway will require trucks to use the left most, or inside, turn lane only as well as
requu:ing vehicles in the outside right turn lane to yield to trucks turning right in the
adjacent lane (Figure 5). This alternative does not have any unpact on the width of the
easterly driveway openulg (exit only) for the gas station.
Alternative 2 - Analysis of a WB 67 turning with a passenger vehicle utilizing a 15' inside
right turn lane, a 12' outside right turn lane and a 60' radius.
Utilizing a WB 67 design vehicle restricted to a 15' inside right turn lane, a passenger vehicle
in a 12' outside right turn lane and a 60' radius along the curb return will allow both
vehicles to make the turn simultaneously based upon analysis utilizing Autoturn software
(Figure 6). TIus alternative will require a fee taking of approximately 357 SF (an increase of
210 SF over the original design) and a TCE of approxunately 203 SF (an increase of 69 SF
over the original design), 1ll0VUlg the signal pole approximately 5 feet to provide 4'
minimum ADA sidewalk clearance from back of curb to pole; modification of the easterly
driveway opening for the gas station (exit only) by narrowing the opening width from
approximately 32' to 21.9'; and shortening the h'aHic separator along Davis Blvd
approximately 5'. Enhanced regulatory signing (black letters on a wlute background) over
the roadway and along the side of the roadway will require trucks to use the left most, or
inside, tum lane only as well as requiring vehicles in the outside right turn lane to yield to
trucks turning right Ul the adjacent lane (Figure 5).
Alternative 3 - Analysis of a WB 67 turning with a passenger vehicle utilizing a 12' inside,right turn lane, a 12' outside right turn lane and a 60' radius.
Utilizing a WB 67 design vehicle resh'icted to a 12' inside right tum lane, a passenger vehicle
in a 12' outside right turn lane and a 60' radius along the curb return will allow both
2
Agenda Item NO.1 OD
December 15, 2009
Collier Blvd, Impr~of 56
Davis Blvd. to Golden Gate Main Canal
County Project 60092
Northwest corner of the Collier BlvdfDavis Blvd Intersection
vehicles to make the turn simultaneously based upon analysis utilizing Autoturn software
(Figure 7). In analyzing the Autoturn analysis from Alternative 2, the WB 67 is located at the
far left side of the 15' lane and does not utilize any of the additional width of the lane to
make its turn. In reducing the lane width from 15' to 12' as proposed in this alternative, the
Autoturn analysis shows that the turning paths for the WB 67 and the car do not change and
the separation between the two is very close to the same as 111 Alternative 2. Additionalty,
using 12' for the width of both right turn lanes will require a fee taking of approximately 300
SF (a reduction of 57 SF from Alternative 2) and the a TCE of approximately 183 SF (a
reduction of 20 SF from Alternative 2), and moving the signal pole approximately 2 feet to
provide 4' mininmm ADA sidewalk clearance from back of curb to pole (a reduction of 3'
from Alternative 2). This alternative will also require the modification of the easterly
driveway opening for the gas station (exit only) from approxinlately 32' to 21.9'; and
shortening the traffic separator along Davis Blvd approximately 5'. Enhanced regulatory
. signing (black letters on a white background) over the roadway and along the side of the
roadway "ill require bucks to use the left most, or inside, turn lane only as well as
requiring vehicles in the outside right turn lane to yield to trucks turning right in the
adjacent lane (Figure 5).
It should be noted that the easterly driveway opening (exit only) for the gas station does not
meet minimum distance requirements from Collier Blvd. in the existing condition, original
design and all proposed alternatives. Concurrence from FDOT will be required to maintain
this driveway access.
A summary of the existing conditions, original design and alternatives is contained in Table
1.
RECOMMENDA nONS
Based upon this analysis, it is recommended that the design be revised to incorporate
Alternative 3 with the enhanced regulatory signillg. 'This alternative allows the largest truck
observed at the intersection and a passenger vehicle to make the right turn simultaneously
and minimizes the amount of additional right of way required for the fee and TCE
acquisitions.
3
~--;~=
t:: == 0.:=
~ I":l 0 ..-
e u ~ ~
~ .$ ti e;
o I'l:l .~~
~~ e..5
E "l'.."
- iU .e- >
"'C1~=CQ
..:: c g \f.l
~ OJ U....
~ :s! ~
~ 0 Q
-0 l.? ::c-
O >
u..... ;
..,;
>
;Q
'"
.;:
"
o
~
~
-
o
U
"
-5
""
o
~
"
"
~
o
u
-
'"
"
~
-5
~
o
Z
Q
o
-
"
~bD
~ .~
." bO
" .~
u Ul
~
.c
C
Ul
rrJ
'-'l
:>
.....
i-
~
Z
..:
'-'l
t:i
~
'"
o
.....
..:
~
~
~
;:J
rrJ
>,J')
" ~
3:: ii>
"" C
o 1:
.'C '5
bOO"
.- "
""'"
....
"
-
.L
'"
i-
C
>.., >. 0 '- >._
ctt!'J:lO('tlbQ
o ~ ::J -5 ~ .~
..... ~ 5:-9 ~ (ll
"R 'C; "t:l ,>'J:: 0..
Ul 0 2:::'0 0
"
o~
""...
03::-
5,]
i.,i) (J)
~"'O"t:l
"(j) ::: !!
." " C
" 0 "
o ~ 0
Q:::;l?~
."
"
"
.c
~
"
>
o
Wr.;--
u-
f-~
gf
~
(i;'
c+"'!2-
"
"
...
~
t:
"
-
" '"
'" ::J
-e:.a
" "
u""
f='
~
.2
-B
:2
1!
"
-'
~ t;:
f-
'"
~ "
- c
.~ro
"'-'
he
~~
o-C
u >
05
c !iJ
bO-
.;;: .S::
".c
" "
0>
'[f'"
bOC
~ ,8
'J:l :t:::
.~ "'0
X C
Ul 0
U
.
.
o
Z
o
Z
o
.,.
N
-
N
-
""
'--
o
en
co
>-
-
o
Z
o
Z
'"
"
>-
'"
"
>-
en N
'"
"
>-
'" '" '"
" " "
>- >- >-
o
Z
'" '" '"
" " "
>- >- >-
.,.
'"
-
~ ('f') rr;
'" 0 00
....... N ,.....
[,
.,.
-
l:'-.. t, 0
.,. en 0
- '" '"
en
.,.
l!'l 0 0
.,. '" '"
N
-
N IN N
...... ..,....... ......
'-- '-- '--
l!'l l!'l N
- - -
N
-
- - -
...... ,..... ,.....
""
'--
o
en
'"
3::
P.... C:.... P-.
'-- '-- '--
N t.... t....
'>D \0 \0
co '" co
3:: 3:: 3::
C
bO
.:;;
"
o
03
C
:~
~
o
N
"
>
',C
"
C
~
2i
:<
'"
"
u
-
"
.;:
;;
c
~
2i
:<
"2'
c
"
o
..
b1J
..>:
u
'"
.!O
"
b1J
C
'"
..
o
C
'"
C
o
b1J
.5
~
..!!:
..>:
u
"
e
bO
.~
.::!l
'"
'tl
<11
-
C
"
o
5
~
'tl
C
'"
o
..
bO
<11
'tl
.-
'"
'tl
'"
o
..
<11
'tl
::J
U
~
."
'"
"
o
'.0
.-
'tl
C
o
,..)
bO
~
.;:l
-
<n
.-
x
"-l
.
.
0"''''
oOC{)
~o~
.N 0
o 'a
Z~LO
E ~ QJ
QJQJO>
.::=:....0 co
",ECL
'OQJ
c <.)
QJ QJ
",0
<t
HI
V)
<:
Q
f--
-
Cl
23
u
~
-
f--
V)
;:;:
L.u
't
'r
r '-I
t,;.
rt~~
Pt1r
r.. ."
r ;'>
a~78
,~/Nla
..
,.,,,,,..,,~-:..-.-""-'"
~__, ''''~n'I',~!'ii;
""''' j"".;", ,~
l~'
,- >... .,,..,
''\:\
~..
~j[----~:.<'---"'~.-'-'''''--
.' __._,___~.IC.".]
. , ~--~~, -- " '-'-.1J
.. .,~\.
~ \. ~- ,
9JTr_l"lS Id
6)'
,
,
,
~~
,
,
I
~
I
I
~ 8
~ i
:;, ,
~ ~
~ ~
!
~
~ ~ i ~
I ~ i
i Q'
~ ~, '"
i=: e 0
II, :
8' "
, u
~
~
/06
589."'2' 45'
.
,if-
'f:. ..
; Irf
!-f
f
F-
..,
~~
. I
!
~
,
.
OOi>C
"el..[)
';"_0>.;-
---., 0
...........iV
~~&)
,u c
",al
c"
alal
",0
4:
c,
~ ~i~
1jP
o
._~
,I ,
o , 0
~;' i::
! . g
,-- ,
,
o
V)
<:
Q
f-
-
Cl",
<:<(
Ou
U<(
(C)
<:
-
f-
\I]
-
""
lJj
J:
>-V)
-'"
,,-
Q
0<(
"''''
, -
"''''
"".
00.
:; ""D ~,.,
~HH
,.
"
','"
,
~g
~
,
.
!
!
I
i
,
I
i
I
~ ~
"l !
!l:: i
~ I
~ ~
'"
,
,
,
..
0-'
~
~
8
~
~ .~
3
a
u
"
m
~
u
~ ~
m
01178
5111'10
I
~
.
..
~'-;~--,,-'--rr""O '1--
_.J.!.- _ .__. __"."'-4 _" ~ .1-_ ~
.. . I . . ~ :~ '
-~._--_._. ,-,-,~-.
.
.,~~
:~f'
Ii iil .
~l~fC ii,
"ft' It.
I ' ""I'"
r:-~.':."l;_;'. ;:
":f 1
'(","
':;;
~
~
~
.
.
,
""'"'~
;
.
, ~
0, !
~~
^
!
j
I
" i
~ ,
,
1 1 I ~ l
~ ,
~ ..,
~ ~ 0
I I ~
~ ::5
~ ,
1.l i<: ;
I I ~
"
e
I I
,
I I ~ i i ~
t ~ ~ ~
I' ~I
~ " i
~ ~ t 3
~ .
" i 0
u
,"I !~
i , ~
~
e, "
. u
1 I ,
..J
..J ,.
I -~ ~l
I 1: '!'i
~ ",
IW~i
,!~iil
! I NJI'~"
Z~ !'6~
i ,I
.,,~,,- U .,
0,
,
I
~ II
~
~ ,
_' 106 ~ ' " ~I
, , 5,89042-
-'.,.
,
,
:,. j;" r-: ,
.
I
'I
,
,
"
00><0
00"' ~H
~O_ 0::
,N 0 -<
o 'N '-'
Z~L() -<
EW~
2.oro :to
- rQ.. hV)
'" C -:;,V)
-0'" ""CllU
c " :::: 0-<'"
",'" ~Q::5
enO ~
<( ~ Cl:llnt..J
CI::: """-
C)
.' 6...-,.
.,
~..\'
r~;;
e-lb,
Ll... ;. ~ .:"u
In~
i1in, ',ij")
I . L,
I I :"
.: I
t:'1L
III cl: I(~""
I ~" 0 I
~f \'~-i: "
,~
:s ~
/..
-'" f//
//..:?
//,,/"
/ //
/:'/"/'"
, /<'
, )~
.':z..
=
.7
.7
f
..
'~'f;!-',~'",
J,ii
1Illr~
t,l"I"',
.
"
,
00)'.0
C):::; ~~..,
~~'o
co- '- CJ,
c: fl) OJ
200m
- rQ..
ro r:
-0'"
c"
",<D
enO
<(
...."j
'~~i - :;;;
L,j '-'
~~ <{ lW
~h:t: ~
Q q: I:::: ~ ':lo::
'fo <:""-u
CI::: C\j~:;'
lL.J \0 Q:: ~
f-..- ,_
-J CQl{)lo
"'< "" '>-
{JJ;
~rJ
III
, II :11
1111:1~
:115rfl
:~~~-~,D.~,-O~ 1;
'I, 1 G,~g _0
---.. ~.--',.-. ~
.
1
~
j
, i
00 l
~'" .
i
,
!
'" ,
~ !
I I I ~ I
~
~ '"
~ 0
i
i ,
,
~ i
<<; ,
~ ,
"
e ,
,
!
,
=~, <> ~
~ "'.'" <>-
~ ,...~"'M
r
OA78
"'5, Alia
C
'Wh
~~-
~\"lg
>~
~':t..'~ ",
:t:::~ "
- 106) < ~
5,8~ 42'
""
,'.'"'s!""!',:\
~"'~itfi_ ,,'
"__(1'#,-'
"
\;
r1tr.."',f",,,.10,.,
i... ~
l"_ .
, F'.,
~- -,",-_.._>>._-------,--".-
I I
,
~h ~
IP ~ I
~h g
~~ u
~~
~ i. ~
e ~ is
..J
=~ ~~
...,.,,~
...~~'t!ill1l
I' '~',"
IU;:~11
NI~~!U
.u !l~
illS '.
U ",
~
,
~
"
.
,
~
,
~
.
,
Q(j)(O
OOl.')
~o~
,N 0
o -'<t
Z~U1
EQi~
2..oro
- EO.
ro",
'0"
c'"
8,0
<!
H'
~
<:
~'"
S2Cl
V)<:
>-."'<
23C\J
f-..- ~
"'<~
-.JV)
~~
L,j~
Cl:::f-..-
"'<
Cl<:
t3~
<:f-..-
"'<-.J
:t::"'<
<:
L,j
~ ~i
..
! 8;
;:; ~~
~ r
ih!
; j I +
~r
..
~o
~ ~. ~
~ --' ~
;~
e~ >
-r ,
e;:: 0..
o .
~ t!~ 3 ~ '"
-. <
.. ;::.2 u
~ '.
h ~
I ~ - ~~
~! ~! ~o
:;3......
~. ~~ ,
;~
'.
i~
q;
q~
! ~l
Hg
001'Ill_SMt?~
J
. ~,-
e J
,
-.r',
. J
'1,i: ..:
~, "',
. '. - ~~pj ..010 .<.. ;C'
'~rt /~!'''
i -, I I III -
.
~,-'
~ ' ".
._,' , .
,
j
"
, ~
, i
~~ J
;
~
~
" ,
,
~ i
~ l
~
~ '" ~
~ ,
" i
~ fS ,
i:l z
" ?
'" <<;
[;j
:::i ,
e ,
,
,
~n ~
I ~, ~
" e
~~ ,
,
'c ~ -
~h J
" i 0
I~ u
i , ~
0,
e ~ ~
u
..J
..J "
-~ ~l
i~!di,i
IIII:~!~-';
Nf~!!jj
"l' I:'
"i 'I'
U '-
~
~
,
^.
.,
eQ
"
'1
li~
~
,.
.
00><0
,~l.O
, '0
",
'en
..:'".......
,-' "- (])
cwo>
"'-" ro
==EQ..
ro",
-0"
c",
g,0
<(
!
~
l
, I
~~
" .
i
\
i
>
" I
~
" I
\J j
'"
0
~ !
~
~ ,
<<; ,
,
,
,
,
!
~
~~i ~ :;;;
"" U lU
~ < -< ~
~I- :r:: :J
Q ~ !::~t3
o CI::: "'~ '"
Lu tlio:~
f-..- ,_
-J ~fiiiQ
"'<
r~~
1 ~
~
r
!
I 'I
;11; ,I
I : 01: 0
II: 0'
L"
;L
! ~::;
'0
o
~~~~
'i:iOf-~
~ 2~~~
~ r~~~
,
{~
~~]~
.
~ i i ~
I ~ ~
! I "j
~~q
"~ S u
!h :1
e ~ 5
=~c>
~~K'
. >
;::~..li
~!~
~~~
.:',;/,..,
~
,
~
.
1!;
'"
, '
, -,
.-,' ,
~';;!!:>x
r:c>'ft:.,
l\'
^-
~~
~-
1_ <t:
~
,
~
~
,
00><0
00"'
0_
~N 0
ci ~<.O
Z~I.D
-~'"
CWO>
"'.0 ro
;:::,-0..
ro C
-0'"
C"
'" '"
0>0
<(
~~ "':;;;
iL,J<JlU
,-::': -< '"
~- <(
l<.. l- J: -.J
· ~ !::~ti
o CI::: ~~~
Lu tpO:::h.
f-..- "'0",
-.J :t l..O_
"'<
fll
;Lti;
fli-rrr@)
II rl~")
gi Ii c II
'I. 'I ·
III I,il~
! I~: 0 ~ i
'-
I I
I II
t I"
i-I I 1
Ii I I I
I I 1
1 1 I
, ,
~h
,.,
.
":" t;:lS:3,";..:
" "'j;;;lIii.,
. '
"
:;i'i>l.e '
~~Q "
~~.'~ ',,'
~Ill " ,
- /06, _ _ _
, ) ,.-
',- .'\",89042' of
""
="
.. '-- .7
',' ,
.~_._.'., ,
Ii'
;- r-d:
rITll ;
,'" 10 ~_ ~_
; r: ~
!
,
~,~
,
,
~$:
j
.
~
I
~
1 ,
,
I
s !
~ .
~ I
~ ~ i
~ ~ I
~ ~ ~
!:l
::l
e
I I
.
~h ~
"l ~ <l.. \,()
I~~
~ I ~ j
~ ~ ~ '::j
g ~ @ c3
IL;
. v
..J
::!~ U
1:U,'ii
1',1"
I~~~~i
N,~.iil
""'0
.i. ~1I..;
.l !r
"i "'
U '-
,
c
,
i
.
0,
.-
00
,I