Ex Parte - Fiala 12/11/18 Ex parte Items - Commissioner Donna Fiala
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
DECEMBER 11, 2018
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
8.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a
hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to
determine that the proposed land use for a veterinary clinic, excluding outdoor kenneling, and
dog grooming are comparable, and compatible uses within the Mixed Use area of the
Vanderbilt Commons MPUD, Ordinance Number 2005-19, as amended, and are therefore found
to be permitted principal uses at the location further described herein. [CUD-PL20180002265]
r NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE (Meetings nCorrespondence ®e-mails ❑Calls
Discussion w/Staff
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a
hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to
deny a Resolution amending Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order 90-3, as amended)for
the Halstatt/Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact by providing for: Section One,
amendments to Development Order by revising the Master Plan to relocate unbuilt access
locations from Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to access locations on Livingston Road
for access only to the areas of the PUD identified as FP&L easement located south of Grey
Oaks Drive East; amendments to Exhibit E, Development Order access conditions and Sub-
Exhibit 1, project access locations and Sub-Exhibit 2 project access conditions; Section Two,
findings of fact; Section Three, conclusions of law; and Section Four, effect of previously
issued Development Orders, transmittal to Department Of Economic Opportunity and effective
date. [PL20170001729] (This is a companion to Agenda Item 9.B - Planned Unit Development
Amendment Petition PUDA- PL20170001548.)
9.B. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex-parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. Recommendation to deny an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 07-40,
the Grey Oaks MPUD, by relocating unbuilt access locations on Airport Road and Golden Gate
Parkway to Livingston Road for access only to the areas of the PUD identified as FP&L
easement located south of Grey Oaks Drive East, and by providing an effective date. The
subject MPUD consisting of 1,601+/-acres is located at the northeast, northwest, and southeast
quadrants of the intersection of Airport Road (S.R. 31) and Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886), in
Sections 24, 25, and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
[PL20170001548] (This is a companion to Agenda Item 9.A- Development Order Amendment
Petition DOA-PL20170001729)
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
X SEE FILE MMeetings nCorrespondence ne-mails (Calls
Met w/ Bill Confoy, Wayne Mulligan, Les Lebaugh & Pete Swain, Met w/Wayne Arnold,
Rich Yovanovich & Al O'Donnell, Discussion w/ Planning Commissioner, Staff Reports
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Donna Fiala
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
DECEMBER 11, 2018
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued)
9.C. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.
Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in.
Recommendation to approve Petition VAC-PL20180001007 to disclaim, renounce and
vacate the County and the public interest in a 70' x 439' portion of the right-of-way
known as Recreation Lane, as recorded in Road Book 3, Page 26 of the Public Records
of Collier County, Florida, located approximately one third of a mile east of Santa
Barbara Boulevard, in Section 33, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida.
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ®Meetings ['Correspondence ❑e-mails ❑Calls
Meeting w/ Bob Mulhare
CONSENT AGENDA
16.A.15 This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.
Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in.
Recommendation to approve for recording the amended final plat of Esplanade Golf
and Country Club of Naples Phase 5, (Application Number PL20180002972) approval of
the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the
amount of the performance security.
❑ NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ['Meetings ['Correspondence [le-mails [Calls
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Donna Fiala
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
DECEMBER 11, 2018
SUMMARY AGENDA
17.A This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.
Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in.
Recommendation to approve Petition VAC-PL20170003027 to disclaim, renounce and
vacate the County and the public interest in a portion of the conservation easement
located in Tract B of Villas at Greenwood Lake, Plat Book 31, Pages 87 through 91 in
the public records of Collier County, Florida. The subject property is located in the
northwest quadrant of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and County Barn Road, in Section
17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (This is a companion to
Agenda Item 17.B)
17.B This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members.
Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in.
Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 93- 74 and
Ordinance No. 98-73, as amended, the Windsong PUD, to amend the Master Plan to
reconfigure the preserve area location on the east side of the PUD, for property
located on the northwest corner of the County Barn Road and Rattlesnake-Hammock
Road intersection, in Section 17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida, consisting of 37.6 acres; and by providing an effective date. (This is a
companion to Agenda Item 17.A)
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
X SEE FILE ®Meetings ®Correspondence ®e-mails (Calls
Emails & Letters from Property Owners, Attended Community Meetings,
Discussion with Planning Commissioner, Staff Report
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Donna Fiala
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
DECEMBER 11, 2018
SUMMARY AGENDA (continued)
17.0 This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.
Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in.
Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 09-37, the
Avow Hospice Community Facility Planned Unit Development; and by amending
Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code by amending
the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of
4.89+/-acres of land zoned Residential Single-Family-5 (RSF-5 (0.4)) to the Avow
Hospice CFPUD; by adding permitted uses including Individual and Family Social
Services (SIC 8322) limited to community centers and adult and/or handicapped day
care centers; by adding accessory uses; by amending the master plan; adding
deviations; and revising developer commitments. The property is located south of
Pine Ridge Road on the west side of Whippoorwill Lane, in Section 18, Township 49
South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 20.55+/-acres; and by
providing an effective date. [PL20170002501]
L NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE I 'Meetings ❑Correspondence ne-mails fCalis
17.E. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.
Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in.
Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 1989-12 and
Ordinance Number 81-43, the Youth Haven Planned Unit Development, by adding
group housing for seniors as a permitted use, by adding 10 beds for a maximum of 250
group housing beds, and adding acreage; by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41,
the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas
map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 1± acres of land
zoned RMF-6 (3) to the Youth Haven Community Facility Planned Unit Development; by
amending the master plan and revising developer commitments. The property is
located on the south side of Whitaker Road west of Santa Barbara Boulevard in
Section 17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of
25± acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20180000646]
171 NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE (Meetings (Correspondence ne-mails (Calls
BrownleeMichael
A toe 16
Subject: Meet w/Wayne Arnold, ich Yovanovich &Al O'Donnell re: Gray Oaks Access Points
Location: BCC Conference Room
Start: Tue 11/27/2018 2:00 PM
End: Tue 11/27/2018 2:30 PM
Recurrence: (none)
Organizer: FialaDonna
Sharon Umpenhour
Senior Planning Technician
IIMI GradyMinor
Q.Grady Minor and Associates, P.A.
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Phone-239.947.1144
Fax-239.947.0375
Email-sumpenhour@gradyminor.com
Web-http://www.gradyminor.com
1
BrownleeMichael
Subject: Meet w/ Bill Confoy,Wayne Mulligan, Les Lebaugh & Pete Swain re: Grey Oaks
Location: BCC Conference Room
Start: Tue 12/4/2018 4:00 PM
End: Tue 12/4/2018 4:30 PM
Recurrence: (none)
Organizer: FialaDonna
262-0802
643-0001
1
AGENDA ITEM 9-C
Co 7eY County
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT -
PLANNING®ULATION
HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2018
SUBJECT: DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DRI (COMPANION TO PUDA-
PL20170001548, GREY OAKS MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT(MPUD))
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS:
Owner*:
Albert O'Donnell
O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc.
4291 Williams Road
Estero, FL 33928
* Approximately 1,046 parcels within the DRI have been sold to others.
Agent:
D. Wayne Arnold
Q. Grady Minor and Associates,P.A.
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DRI
August 18, 2018
Page 1 of 5
} j .
y
----rtnr
wow
t
t t
I
2
- 1
U
■ # I ( w
�., ti Q a,U.VI r { �`
i I a.v ,._. `�,� "'.` " `fifa. r U s•o—4
0 3
F.
J fA"
_-
Logan BLVD N $U Alfi o.-E r i - 1— CIh13 a f'gaa9 Ilug
o W f 1,•
45 „I'.1,
V pLute,Sv:,ne-)
Y
F.
Y
ON NtYiS9htthll cu.
CZ
f•
DNt1 no
_ ,It.ON DNI a 1 1-111,sz►usitiOzi, - _00-, .c C
1 km otgzA9 CZ
0
0
`` 31
d"31iO0(SO Q8
h1N11 1 ! 9L
P
IIi
-11
f
DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DRI
August 18, 2018
Page 2 of 5
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner seeks a Resolution amending Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order 90-3, as
amended) for the Halstatt/Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact by providing for: Section
One, amendments to Development Order by revising the Master Plan to relocate unbuilt access
locations from Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to access locations on Livingston Road
for access only to the areas of the PUD identified as FP&L easement located south of Grey Oaks
Drive East; amendments to Exhibit E, Development Order access conditions and Sub-Exhibit 1,
project access locations and Sub-Exhibit 2 project access conditions; Section Two, findings of
fact; Section Three, conclusions of law; and Section Four, effect of previously issued
Development Orders,transmittal to Department Of Economic Opportunity and effective date.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject property, consisting of 1,601.39± acres, is located at the intersection of Golden Gate
Parkway and Airport-Pulling Road in Sections 24, 25, and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25
East, Collier County, Florida. (See Location Map on the preceding page.)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The original Grey Oaks DRI DO was adopted on June 6, 1990, via DRI DO 90-292. Several
changes to the original DRI DO have occurred. These are as follows:
(i) Resolution No. 90-498 (Development Order No. 90-5), October 16, 1990;
(ii) Resolution No. 90-571,November 27, 1990;
(iii) Resolution No. 98-472 (Development Order No. 98-2),November 24, 1998;
(iv) Resolution No. 98-471,November 24, 1998;
(v) Resolution No. 00-190 (Development Order No. 00-04), June 27,2000;
(vi) Resolution No. 07-99 (Development Order No. 07-02),April 24,2007;
(vii) Resolution No.09-269(Development Order No. 09-01),November 10,2009;and
(viii) Resolution No. 13-01 (Development Order No. 13-01), June 11, 2013.
The petitioner seeks an amendment to modify Exhibit E and Map H-1 attached to Development
Order Number 2000-04, Resolution Number 2000-190. The amendment proposes to shift two
previously approved, but unimproved project access points from Golden Gate Parkway and
Airport Road to Livingston Road. These two project access points shown on Map H have never
been constructed; they were intended to serve as general access points to the Grey Oaks
community. The two access points proposed to be shifted to Livingston Road are not intended
for general access to the Grey Oaks community, but rather are intended for the sole use of a 32±
acre landscape nursery located under a Florida Power and Light (FPL) easement. Please see
attached Exhibit A: Proposed Resolution.
DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DRI
August 18, 2018
Page 3 of 5
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY(DEO) :
The DEO in consultation with the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC) has
found that the proposed amendment does not create the likelihood of any additional regional
impact, the proposed amendment does not require the filing of a Notice of Proposed Change
(NOPC), and that the proposed amendment will only require an application to Collier County to
amend the development order.
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (SWFRPC):
As previously stated, the SWFRPC did not review the proposed amendment as a filing of a
NOPC is not required.
COUNTY STAFF ANALYSIS:
Development authorizations contained in DRI Development Orders are prerequisites to zoning
actions that implement DRI land use authorizations. DRI Development Orders are intended to
address regional impacts of a project.
As noted in the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) letter dated October 4,
2017 (see Attachment B), the proposed shifting of two previously approved access points from
Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, to Livingston Road for the Grey Oaks DRI
Development Order meets the requirements of Section 380.06(19)(e)2., Florida Statutes and does
not create any additional regional impact.
As noted above, the applicant is seeking to revise the Master Development Plan and amend
sections of DO 2000-04.
Staff recommends approval of the DRI Development Order Resolution with the understanding
that there are no regional impacts, and this amendment will not adversely impact adjacent
property owners or create an undue public safety concern if the DRI DO is adopted.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the staff report for Petition DOA-PL20170001729 on
August 10, 2018.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward a recommendation of approval
of Petition DOA-PL20170001729 to the Board of County Commissioners as described by the
amending DRI Development Order resolution.
DOA-PL2017
0001729, GREY OAKS DRI
August 18, 2018
Page 4 of 5
Attachments:
Attachment A: Proposed Resolution
Attachment B: Aerials Depicting Removed and Relocated Access Points
Attachment C: Future Land Use Consistency Review
Attachment D: Letter of Support
Attachment E: Transcript of the Neighborhood Information Meeting
Attachment F: Application
DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DRI
August 18, 2018
Page 5 of 5
5j&9untY
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT-PLANNING &
REGULATION
HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2018
SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD) (COMPANION TO DOA-PL20170001729,
GREY OAKS DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT(DRI))
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS:
Owner*/Applicant:
Albert O'Donnell
O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc.
4291 Williams Road
Estero, FL 33928
*Approximately 1,046 parcels within the PUD have been sold to others.
Agent:
D. Wayne Arnold
Q. Grady Minor and Associates,P.A.
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs,FL 34134
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), consider amending
Ordinance No. 07-40,the Grey Oaks Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development(MPUD),by relocating
unbuilt access locations on Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to Livingston Road for access
only to the areas of the PUD identified as FP&L easement located south of Grey Oaks Drive East,
and by providing an effective date.
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 1 of 14
all
IMO iia
Mil ll - , *k- ' , ent..,,:,. .,,,,,::,, -;
1 w
. 1141104411 is
111
, 11111116.
,..104.,,ma•ma,"t.--....17,7,4-,:t. si--is' .;!..f.y.;,-,z,-,.;),:::/;,7,-;:i ,,,. 1 - ' ri,,
47: 3+
co
-+ bill
,LEP
! J - taadaro C
, ....,,,7 , ';! - , *I 417
�! i y " x N
w "MI ti w
w
f.� _3 ;' i.. Lai.l-J».Js ' ,'i.=rt 0 1
L F `
pram"adkniblati
- '� 1 h -
;. \tel. 'lir
Z
La51 IgL11D N
�� 5 tlAlJ3 O.vl t~7 C 19 .:gJrg 4urg
5 W fa
a 0 Qa wep tlule�r�
ix
o d J C
•
01
D.
a-NQLSONlhil - a CO
o
4 M
W
v f}N1l old ,off
NON 3 NIl'1(ld I-
03
»
pa aa�anap ._0
a
Co
n
? Q
ya` J
141 V.44.u J.
is i Cr- sty
N ial+tuNlulel 9TT4 ST N
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 2 of 14
....
aT OH E31J I!1Q!(SlYiId 1, ,i
1-H dVY4- NV1d F�1ISW Gild ' .�
II Li 1
OM
, sivivostimi
3
i C
1 :4: .,
,:;
1,
t g
I. it • \4.4
h II.
..
Imii..m I: I .t,,,,:,,,.4 z„,,,s,as„ ,.,,,,,,-s:,.s.,Av,.,,,i ...___
•
xti' 7.,,.n\-- 4,;'-z -lzg,-.!"-::',_:.,7,,,,,.;s�; � ' m �,,�'�_` �� �I�p ,�
`'�+..:.a. - ` 3Jj` tt.�. T. f ;.tik, ♦rye y `•,� . 1 .
' d" �+`+.\ \vt , `ti 4,„<„,,,,,q 'kX,,,.w,<4,..,, ,,----
„`.' '~ ' o
,._,-Ark:::"A;' Al* ,14-;),"'"'“-; 1 ooluiti',- '`:_.....''''4-.id, '.;:i ,ill
,ivy," I ,!..SsC. � � At' „ ta+ ` * ,,,,LA v l% j ,lf fr :::''ift.) I�I 111
ily L k ,,tc- 'g®gii
,-., ,T... ....4-,,...„...,b e,.\*:'
. '` + i T - t i-I/V�-s" ��� .= . 6.
,tri
�` q, . 'r,q kttYrx ' ,� + `nf—� f�H, 14151_00, Ij �►, tif.._: sf,:+rl:ft}2}i >�r r
� fY.lt•�{Sssawtt+•:f1 Fx..ti71`I• jam1
/ii it a I: 911 R
fI I'
1 .,
11 mil 1!1 .
9p rte
01 li ' .J .1
1 ir 11 '''
•
Jam. - t
t
III
01
Olin iz•= -> nri. 1 i2 4■aaa3S5 In
Iii
I $ 1 211 1 11 I 1
0
...„ mi . -
1 0 00010908i tft
PUDArigh 1 1
-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 3 of 14
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject MPUD consisting of 1,601.39±acres is located at the northeast,northwest,and southeast
quadrants of the intersection of Airport Road (S.R. 31) and Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886), in
Sections 24, 25, and 26, Township 49 South,Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Please, see
the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development(PUD)was originally approved in Ordinance Number
75-34 on August 19, 1975. There have been several subsequent ordinances which have been
repealed: Ordinance Numbers 90-48, 96-82, 97-45, 98-94 and 00-46. The current ordinance is
Ordinance Number 07-40 approved by the Board on April 24,2007. The PUD is currently approved
for 1,775 dwelling units, 1,303,091 square feet of commercial and office and four golf courses. The
Grey Oaks MPUD is mostly developed with residences, a golf course,and a clubhouse. There is an
FPL easement located along the entire eastern boundary of the PUD.
The petitioner is proposing to modify the Master Plan, Map H-1, attached to Ordinance 2007-40 to
shift two previously approved, but unimproved project access points, from Golden Gate Parkway
and Airport Road to Livingston Road. These two project access points shown on Map H have never
been constructed;they were intended to serve as general access points to the Grey Oaks community.
The two access points proposed to be shifted to Livingston Road are not intended for general access
to the Grey Oaks community,but rather are intended for the sole use of a 32±acre landscape nursery
located under a Florida Power and Light(FPL) easement. Please see attached Exhibit C -Aerials.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING (related to the proposed plant nursery):
North: Golf course maintenance facility and undeveloped land and then Grey Oaks Drive East, an
ingress/egress point into the Grey Oaks PUD within an FPL easement with a zoning
designation of Grey Oaks MPUD.
East: Residential development with a zoning designation of Wyndemere PUD and Estates(E).
South: FPL substation within an FPL easement with a zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A).
West: Developed residential uses with a zoning designation of Grey Oaks MPUD.
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 4 of 14
,, r .Tam -
.
t. tTmm P ,n rEaSi - y
< $ .Ponco c,,,,,login DR 1 - ._
N ' SUBJECT 101
y
- 3� PROPERTY rr,
. , . _ , ,
r .r a ,.
3i
, . - - ' „ ,, , —
. ,.... .
T,,,,s -
,,
\ tfl * _If 1(1 / t . . ._
i
+11 — - lI
ys°
,
r i G�
«
y
,yy„r ,Golden Gam PKWY —` t '1 2
«.s.F 3 ,r . 'l,
• f, ,
�' v
4
r
'{}' -.. ,mr:.....:......,..�.......sem_.. r �e...s.e.!arKmIwii11o.1tx ,< �
1:. Ynvw o
•
AERIAL PHOTO
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Amendment and has found it
consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. See attached Exhibit B -FLUE
Consistency Review.
Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact
Statement(TIS)for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the
2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR's).
Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states:
"The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications,
conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element(FLUE)
affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with
consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not
approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment
as identified in the current A UIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 5 of 14
as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or
adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below
an adopted Level of Service Standard(LOS)within the five year AUIR planning period, unless
specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant
impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur:
a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal
to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume;
b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to
or exceeds 2%of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and
c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it
is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume.
Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and
submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant
impacts on all roadways."
The proposed PUD Amendment on the subject property was reviewed based on the applicable 2017
AUIR Inventory Report. The Traffic Impact Statement(TIS) submitted in the application indicates
that the proposed landscape nursery development will generate approximately 463 PM peak hour
two-way trips, which according to the TIS, represents the same number of PM peak hour two-way
trips remaining for retail use allowed by the existing PUD. The proposed development will impact
the following roadway segments with the listed capacities:
Roadway Link 2017 Current Peak 2017 AUIR
AUIR Hour Peak Remaining
Existing Direction Service Capacity
LOS Volume/Peak
Direction
Livingston Pine Ridge B 3,100/North 1,596
Road Road to Golden
Gate Parkway
Livingston Golden Gate B 3,000/North 1,691
Road Parkway to
Radio Road
Golden Gate Airport-Pulling C 3,300/East 1,100
Parkway Road to
Livingston
Road
Golden Gate Livingston D 3,300/East 529
Parkway Road to I-75
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 6of14
Based on the 2017 AUIR,the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the
proposed trips for the amended project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject
rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP.
Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (Site Development Plan
(SDP) or Plans and Plat(PPL)).
GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD Amendment may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of
the GMP.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon
which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC)
Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the
"PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission
Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's
recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the
Board of Collier County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action
on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the
heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following
analysis:
Environmental Review: The proposed changes do not affect any of the environmental requirements
of the GMP or LDC. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council(EAC)review,
as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in
Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances.
Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with
the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project.
Utility Review: Utility Review staff has reviewed the petition and has found no impact on public
utilities.
Zoning and Land Development Review: The Grey Oaks MPUD is mostly developed with single and
multi-family residences, an adult living facility, golf courses and a clubhouse. There is an FPL
easement located along the entire eastern boundary of the PUD. As previously stated, the purpose
of the proposed amendment is to relocate two unconstructed access points along Airport Road, and
Golden Gate Parkway intended to serve the Grey Oaks community. They will be relocated to two
new access points along Livingston Road and will provide sole access to a 32-acre plant nursery
located under an FPL easement. The Master Plan has been updated to reflect the proposed changes.
REZONE FINDINGS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon
which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5.,
Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and
Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 7 of 14
"Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The
CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use
the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request.An evaluation relative to these subsections
is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In
addition, staff offers the following analysis:
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
future land use map and the elements of the GMP.
The Comprehensive Planning staff has indicated that the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent
with all applicable elements of the FLUE of the GMP. See Attachment B-Flue Consistency Review.
2. The existing land use pattern.
As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the
zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as
residential, golf course, essential service, and commercial lands.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
At the time the subject property was rezoned to a PUD, it was deemed to be of sufficient size and did
not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed PUD
Amendment does not change this finding.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions
on the property proposed for change.
The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment
necessary.
The proposed change is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC
provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to reallocate two undeveloped access
points from Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to Livingston Road.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with the County's land use policies upon adoption that
are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Development in compliance
with the proposed PUD rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area.
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 8 of 14
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or
projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e.,
GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element
consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order(SDP
or Plat). Additionally,the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency
management regulations when development approvals are sought.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The proposed PUD Amendment will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is
subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
The proposed PUD Amendment will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas inside or outside the
PUD. Furthermore, the PUD Document provides adequate property development regulations to
ensure light and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas. The Master Plan further
demonstrates that the locations of proposed preserve and open space areas should further ensure
light and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area.
Staff is of the opinion this PUD Amendment will not adversely impact property values.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
Properties around the Grey Oaks PUD are mostly developed. The basic premise underlying all of
the development standards in the LDC is that their sound application, when combined with the site
development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a
change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property.
Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent
properties.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
The development complies with the GMP, which is a public policy statement supporting zoning
actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed
amendment does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further
determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public
interest.
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 9 of 14
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with
existing zoning.
The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning designations.
However,the petitioner is seeking this PUD Amendment to relocate two previously approved access
points from Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road to Livingston Road in compliance with LDC
provisions. The proposed amendment meets the intent of the PUD district.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
county.
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Amendment is not out of scale with the needs of the
neighborhood or County.
15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is
not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition
was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC,and staff does not review
other sites in conjunction with a specific petition.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be
required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed
zoning classification.
Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and
this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development
regulations during the site development plan approval process and again later as part of the building
permit process.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and
implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance.
The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate
Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the
GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by County staff that is
responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has
concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts of the Level
of Service will be minimized.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall
deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing.
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 10 of 14
PUD FINDINGS:
LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make
findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria."
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land,surrounding areas,traffic and access, drainage,sewer, water,
and other utilities.
The Grey Oaks PUD is an established project which has been developed primarily with residential,
golf course, park preserve, and office uses. The subject site fronts on Livingston Road. Water
distribution and wastewater collection/transmission mains are readily available within these rights-
of-way, and there is adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve the proposed PUD.
The project would also be required to comply with County regulations regarding drainage and other
utilities. Therefore,the site is suitable for the proposed development.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract,
or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such
areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control of the
property located under an FPL easement south of Grey Oaks Drive East. Additionally, the
development will be required to gain PPL and SDP approval. These processes will ensure that
appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of
infrastructure will be provided by the developer.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies
of the GMP.
County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives,
and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis,staff
is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
The currently approved development, landscaping, and buffering standards were determined to be
compatible with the adjacent uses and with the use mixture within the project itself at the time the
PUD was approved. Staff has concluded that this amendment will not change the project's
compatibility,both internally and externally.
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 11 of 14
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation
Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development
order (SDP or PPL), at which time, a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements
for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable
concurrency management regulations when development approvals,including but not limited to any
plats and or site development plans, are sought.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including Collier County Water-Sewer District
potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. Furthermore, adequate public
facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the
particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and
deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the
most similar conventional zoning district. The petitioner is not seeking any deviations.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The applicant conducted a NIM on June 25, 2018, at Naples Church of Christ, 12760 Livingston
Road,Naples, Florida. Approximately eight residents attended the meeting along with the Agent's
team and Applicant. The residents and Agent/Applicant discussed traffic patterns on Livingston
Road, lighting within the proposed landscape nursery, and hours and days of operation. For further
information, see attached Exhibit D - Transcript of Neighborhood Information Meeting.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on August 10, 2018.
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDA-
PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development(PUD),to the BCC with a recommendation
of approval.
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 12 of 14
Attachments:
Attachment A: Proposed PUD Ordinance
Attachment B: FLUE Consistency Review
Attachment C: Aerials Depicting Removed and Relocated Access Points
Attachment D: Transcript of the Neighborhood Information Meeting
Attachment E: Letter of Support
Attachment F: Application
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 13 of 14
PREPARED BY:
g 115
NANCY P L• CH,AICP,PLA DATE
PRINCI•A PL: ER
ZONIN♦ ►, ISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION
REVIEWED BY: �-
a-- -- a
RAYMO . BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DA E
ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION
4-(f-l9
MIKE BOSI, AICP,DIRECTOR DATE
ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION
APPROVED BY:
JAMES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
PUDA-PL20170001548,GREY OAKS PUD
September 7,2018
Page 14 of 14
irunty
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 18,2018
SUBJECT: PETITION NO: PUDA-PL20160001023 —WINDSONG PUD
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Applicant: Agent:
The Villas of Greenwood Lake HOA, Inc. Agnoli, Barber and Brundage Inc.
Richard P. Barry, President Tom Barber, AICP
6230 Shirley Street, #202,Naples, FL, 34109 7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200
Naples,FL 34108
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an
application to amend Ordinance No.93-74 and Ordinance No.98-73,as amended,the Windsong PUD.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject property is located on the northwest corner of the County Barn Road and Rattlesnake-
Hammock Road intersection, in Section 17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida, consisting of 37.6+/-acres. (see location map,page 2).
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The petitioner is requesting to amend the Windsong Planned Unit Development(PUD), approved via
Ordinance #93-74 and Ordinance #98-73 by amending the PUD Master Plan to allow for the
reconfiguration of the Preservation Area in order to accommodate the construction of a 6-foot privacy
wall on top of the perimeter berm on the east side of the PUD.
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 1 of 12
Revised: October 5, 2018
r
0
• ft
O
, ui — � i. i/IttAi
... tit 11,,..) .
�; . d+,® V: �16 '
41 0 407 wAZd °•#0
., a I $ ,. : �4)44 Qi
mar' d a., 4)4" C
4%00 a 4 7: 4~�, ..;,,,3 1tt�t?.Fi�id1' i 4 ir,eO' O
w�`'e0 4. `'�► a�eL� v°/ - r-- bd�X04 7,,,. �,►#, N
..
..,,, -.5.----0. ---..-( ' ' V ir
a f°° ®mut 0.- .4 I ' ,,111-..\ 0
+ •* tl .
-sp
`
/,// N
2.1
.41.°.°1
i i i
E
x
Z
E 0
OMR eJeg9 J elueS I m
V O 0.
co
i ,.,,. as uae M a
II 0
O
CI Ca
J
0
t4
o
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 2 of 12
Revised: October 5, 2018
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties
surrounding the boundaries of the Windsong PUD.
North: Developed multi-family and single-family homes with a zoning designation of RMF-6 (6.0
DU/AC)which is approved for single and multi-family dwellings, family care facilities, and
educational plants and public schools; and Riviera Golf Estates PUD (3.68 DU/AC) and is
approved for single family dwellings
East: County Barn Road, a two-lane arterial roadway, and then mobile home park with a zoning
designation of MH(7.26 DU/AC)which is approved for mobile homes,family care facilities,
recreational vehicles, and educational plants and public schools
South: Rattlesnake Hammock Rd, a four-lane arterial roadway, and then multi-family homes with a
zoning designation of RMF-16 (16.0 DU/AC)which is approved for multi-family dwellings,
townhouses, family care facilities, and educational plants and public schools
West: Developed multi-family homes with a zoning designation of RMF-6 (6.0 DU/AC) which is
approved for single and multi-family dwellings, family care facilities, and educational plants
and public schools
,RIVIERA`.
r _tel, ..a ae IS', ft RmER , '' ,4, — •R to C1"4P
Y 1 �t Ji *'t
.3, c Alt is. ,, ESTATES }4 M1. jp 't '° is 1 unci C I ICM F1 i11
'X 4' .r „
' -. er' "'6T t ` * '
�'ffi,Vers of 11 as C4R 3m tx"'" -'�
...�.: '',,!! PUD Boundary T,f
r w_e n f n f f�p R a W14444� b +a' 4tr_ '"0 ( _�M .
_ f• /g� PPDPPRP;$1._gP,tric till 4t
,w. . ,``tr t s Ra iS i�L€QCF Tp�.}a�laji5}h`
a 1 f r1,T jjP 3 3" N
' - ..,`"fir tw NOON - -
^.. :;; iia a ' _ O O a`irj
Q
r4.
.6/I�. n` -�-,_ `IF.'a Zoning.PUO $1?"'
".'» ,... NIP f 2 .N ^tA 4tf�`so-�'"''
r„t
ru uJ q
RR R aa.w
t ..Join_I l9.'0 n .a3 Gb$ B ms• RT-
f ema - r. - * * rs a , Additional Acreage within PUD¢'
: _ 4ne�v o °
,tt Il ' '- , , . .. .., ... , i. a —
_ i i
II
.
,r- n ' -R - t 1 e 4”a, k R a m m c grip k • .1,".r "aa W"'*.
lief114045.00
R16 * 1 E i;DM • 6
... :.,....... ,.. 6i 26 I•... ot
nor# �7
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 3 of 12
Revised: October 5, 2018 1
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN(GMP) CONSISTENCY:
The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed amendment.
Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with
the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of
any amendment petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP.
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Staff identified the FLUE policies relevant to this project and
determined that the proposed amendment to the PUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the
GMP. Please, see Attachment B—FLUE Consistency Review for a more detailed analysis of how staff
derived this determination.
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff reviewed the application and found this
project consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. There is no increase in
the number of residential dwelling units/traffic generation, no changes to the master plan including
point(s)of access or circulation, and no changes to the developer commitments;therefore,there are no
transportation planning impacts related to this request.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found
this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). A
minimum of 6.1 acres of native vegetation are required to be retained for the PUD.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon
which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning
Commission Recommendation(commonly referred to as the"PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F,
Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which
establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. An evaluation relative to these
subsections is discussed below,under the heading"Zoning Services Analysis."
Drainage: The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems.
Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the
environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District.County
staff will also evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria
through the site development plan(SDP)and/or platting(PPL).
Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and PUD master plan
to address environmental concerns. Pursuant to the PUD document(Ordinance No. 98-73),minimum
of 6.1 acres of native vegetation is required to be retained for the PUD. The preserve is proposed to be
reconfigured to accommodate a privacy wall.
Landscape Review: The landscape buffers shown on the Master Plan are consistent with LDC
requirements.
School District: The Collier County School District does not have any issue with the proposed
amendment as it will not impact the District's level of service.
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 4 of 12
Revised: October 5,2018
Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff reviewed the petition for compliance with the
GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this PUD Amendment.
Utilities Review: The requested action would have no impact on utilities.
Zoning Services Review: In 1988, a 37.6-acre PUD was approved for the subject property, changing
the land use from Agriculture (A-2)to a mixed-use PUD allowing for commercial, multi-family, and
single family uses. In 1993, the Board of County Commissioners down-zoned the PUD, removing 1
commercial uses and higher density residential. In 1998,a PUD to PUD rezone was approved,creating
the Windsong PUD, allowing for 145 single-family residential homes while eliminating multi-family
and assisted living units. The PUD also included 6.1 acres for the preserve requirement. In September
2016, the petitioner applied for an insubstantial change to the Windsong PUD (PDI) requesting an
amendment to the existing PUD, reconfiguring the existing preserves. This reconfiguration would
allow for a wall to be placed along County Barn Road,and the preserve would be setback 28 feet from
the PUD boundary.Reconfiguration of the preserve was needed to meet the required preserve setbacks
and landscaping for the construction of the wall. At the March 23, 2017 Hearing Examiner (HEX)
meeting, this PDI application was postponed to a future date pending the vacation of the existing
Conservation Easement.It was determined by Staff that this easement vacation must be approved prior
to, or simultaneously with, the PDI being approved. Procedurally in order, for the PUD Amendment
and the accompanying easement vacation be considered by the Board of County Commissioners, the
petition was converted from a PDI to a PUD Amendment.
Currently, the Windsong PUD has 5.52 acres of preserve area; however, the total required preserve
area is 6.02 acres. The petitioner is requesting that 0.60 acres of preserve area(See table on next page
illustrated in blue)be converted to open space to allow for the construction of a six-foot wall; thereby
leaving 4.92 acres of preserve area.Moreover,an additional 1.20 acres of preserve area will be situated
at the southeast corner of the PUD;thereby totaling 6.12 acres of preserve area. (See table on next page
illustrated in green) The 6.12 preserve area acreage will exceed the total required preserve acreage by
0.10 acres; thereby, complying with the preserve acreage requirement. Furthermore, walls are not
permitted within a preserve area, so the applicant must remove a 28-foot wide portion of the preserve
adjacent to County Barn Road to allow for the wall,and then relocate that portion of preserve elsewhere
on site. The 28-foot wide portion of preserve will become open space. The amended Master Plan
reflects this reconfiguration of the preserve.
Intentionally blank
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 5 of 12
Revised: October 5, 2018
ATTACHMENT 4(PLAN EXHIBIT)
Villas at Greenwood Lake HOA
Preservation Area Plan AGNC)l..l
March BARBER &
-D
n'MANIAC& 2018 BRUNDAGE, INC.
RIVIERA GOLF ESTATES, UTILITY EASEMENT
UNIT 2 Professional Engineers,Planners&Surveyors
(PLAT sopa Li PAC[l —tll) i#
( v....4:mwus. cn.: ,.
g :mlk. !t.: n+�e ws.. etM�ttd k#k§+
1 '<.
1 1 1 1 1
MII 1 Mt 1 ASO 1 ASO 1 ASS 1 057 1 496
) 01 9 ,�.
6# fr ;
..a or �;
Preserve Area removed
CV
A.r. D & '1 , 3 New Limit of Preserve
rp4'oc„e ( _28' West of Property Line
�i
0 ...
Summary"
' Relocated from Preservation Area
no ow Remove 28' along East Property Line
� � P n5
28' by 928'equals 25.984 sf(0.60ac)
CID
a PUD=3?.60ac
a a Required Preserve= 16%
dit, g o (ED x Total Preserve Required=6.02ac
NM li'4`
m ce z Previously Provided= 5.52ac
op m al 7 Minus Removal= 5.52 - 0.60=4.92ac
Lo
op at" FIV Plus Additional=4.92 + 1.20=6.12ac
OP OF
Z Total Provided=6.12 ac
J j ?!P 0
:t 1311 00.010.5::
MAC?A'
— New Preserve Area
.../ % - 52.084 sf(also accommodates future preserve
IMPACT-re i
AL.os.AM CUL required for conununity buildout) (1.20ac)
) 060040
" ti`tawe?r
µDiAW A
RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD Not to Scale
C.R 864 125' R/W
Preservation Area Plan by Agnoli, Barber and Brundage Inc.
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 6 of 12
Revised: October 5, 2018
Staff finds the proposed Amendment to be consistent and compatible with the commitments established
by Ordinance #93-74 and 98-73. (See Attachment C for amended master plan with associated cross
section of proposed wall.)
PUD FINDINGS:
LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make
findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings
in LDC Section 10.02.08":
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation
to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and believes the uses and property development
regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area. The commitments made by the
applicant and staffs recommended stipulations should provide adequate assurances that the proposed
change should not adversely affect living conditions in the area.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may
relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance
of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the application were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and
demonstrate unified control of the property.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and
policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant
goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report on
pages 5-6.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report, the landscape buffers depicted in the
Master Plan are consistent with LDC requirements.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
The usable open space areas are increasing; therefore,no deviation from required usable open space is
being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or PPL.
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 7 of 12
Revised: October 5, 2018
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the consistency
review. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency
management regulations when development approvals are sought, including but not limited to any plats
and site development plans.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
The area has adequate supporting infrastructure,including Collier County Water-Sewer District potable
water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the
petitioner,and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when
development approvals are sought.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in
the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
All future development proposed on the Windsong PUD would have to comply to the LDC and other
applicable codes. The petitioner is not requesting any deviations to the LDC.
Rezone Findings:
LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that
the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when
applicable":
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of
the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the GMP.
Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives,
and policies of the(FLUM) and other elements of the GMP.
2. The existing land use pattern.
The existing land use pattern(of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and
Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns
of the surrounding properties.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
The property is currently zoned PUD and would remain as such.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 8 of 12
Revised: October 5,2018
This petition does not propose any change to the boundaries of the PUD. The Master Plan would be
updated by relabeling the subject property.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning
necessary.
There are no changes to the uses or development standards. They are simply reconfiguring the preserve
area.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The proposed PUD Amendment is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses,because of peak volumes
or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation
Element consistency review. Finally,the project's development must comply with all other applicable
concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any
plats and or site development plans, are sought.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area,
provided stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage on this project will be
addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD). County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management
system, calculations, and design criteria at time of SDP and/or PPL.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
It is not anticipated the changes proposed to this PUD Amendment would seriously reduce light or air
to the adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas.
This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to
the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however,
zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
Staff does not anticipate this amendment serving as a deterrent to the improvement of residential
adjacent properties.
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 9 of 12
Revised: October 5,2018
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasting with the public welfare.
If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that
constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said
Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special
privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because
actions consistent with plans are in the public interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed
reconfiguration of 6.12 acres of Preservation Area cannot be achieved without amending the PUD.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
County.
It is staffs opinion that the proposed amendment to Windsong PUD will not be out of scale with the
needs of the community.
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use
in districts already permitting such use.
The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically
review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration,which would
be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed
zoning classification.
Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and
this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development
regulations during the SDP and platting processes,and again later as part of the building permit process.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and
as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance,
as amended.
The requested action would have no impact on the availability of adequate public facilities and services.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall
deem important in the protection of the public health,safety, and welfare.
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 10 of 12
Revised: October 5, 2018
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, since it does not meet
the EAC scope of land development project reviews identified in Chapter 2,Article VIII, Division 23,
Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING(NIM):
On September 11, 2018 a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was conducted by Tom Barber
of Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc., representing the Villas at Greenwood Lake HOA. The meeting
commenced at approximately 6:00 PM and ended at 6:21 PM. There were no objections relative to the
proposed reconfiguration of the conservation area or the proposed 6-foot wall along County Barn Road.
There was some questioning from the public directed to the President of the Home Owners Association
(HOA) relative to assessments fees and time frame for construction. Many of the questions by the
homeowners related to the HOA approval of this project. Tom deferred those questions to Richard
Barry,the HOA President,who was on hand to field those questions. A couple of letters of opposition
and/or concern over how the HOA handled the assessment were submitted to staff and are a part of the
backup. A copy of the NIM summary and sign-in sheet are included in Attachment D.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on October 4, 2018.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval.
Attachments:
A) Proposed Ordinance
B) FLUE Consistency Review
C) Master Plan/Cross Section
D) Backup Materials
E) Correspondence
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 11 of 12
Revised: October 5, 2018
PREPARED BY:
cA
GILBERT"GIL"MARTINEZ, PAINQIPAL PLANNER DATE
ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION
REVIEWED BY:
72„.
RAYMON V. BELLOWS ZONING MANAGER DATE
ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION
(LI x- 18
MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE
ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION
APPROVED BY:
/e) - G
MES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
PUDA-PL20160001023 Windsong PUD Page 12 of 12
Revised: October 5.2018
September 8,2016
Donna Fiala
Collier County Commissioner
Our Board of Directors at the Villas of Greenwood Lakes which is located at the
corner of County Barn Road and Rattlesnake Hammock Road want to build a fence along
County Barn Road which is considered a"preserve"area. According to the Board of
Directors,they are repairing common areas that where lost or damaged due to the
construction of the turn lane built on County Barn Road. Actually, at this time"nature"
has restored itself with new growth.
We as owners were told no one could do anything or even go into the preserve
area. Furthermore,that there are no other communities in Collier County that have fences
in or around a preserve area.
Some of our residents (over 50%)wrote and presented a signed petition to the
community Board of Directors opposing the construction of a fence. I have enclosed a
copy of the signed petition.
Regardless of our requests,the Board of Directors is moving forward,perhaps
violating county ordinances in regards to building a fence the preserve area. In an effort
to prevent not only an expense to our community but to this preserve area,we are
requesting that you please take a look into this issue.
Thank you in advance.
Sincerely,
60--Q
w._
ea...10a_ 2__.
57 7 t 6'R,2pN .o �i rz.
1 ",4 e5 to-a1 44
` e ( t2_
From: Barbara Loewel Ioewelb@hotmail.com
Subject: No Subject
Date: Today at 4:34 PM
To: Barbara Loewel loewelb@hotmeil.com
January 7, 2016
I, Faith Andrews, as a representative of Directors Choice, LLC
for Greenwood Lake HOA, do acknowled e receipt of a survey
of homeowners containing 75 signatures stating their wish to
have their Board of Directors vote NO on the proposed $1500
Special Assessment coming before the Board for a vote.
�
Date ,/49 -- 1: A, 0.t X44. -z- _.�
We, the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled
September 29, 2015 Board Meeting.
• !/J `� ,c7F)
)
Signature House Number
• r
/• t�/tel (i./ ..^` 'l,i- `lV=� • F/ . f 7
Sig . • re siv
House Number
Arf: AIM
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
•
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
ii
Anna Woodland
From; Anna Woodland [capecocdwood@comcast.netj
Sent: Wednesday,September 30,2015 9:00 PM
To; 'kanesheryl@aoLcom'
Subject: Petition to sign and return by U.S. Mail
We, the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to
vote "NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled September 29,
2015 meeting or at any subsequent scheduled meeting regarding this special assessment.
A (leg . CINE AP 5680
Signatre of Owner House Number
S 67
Signatte of Owner House Number
r
r
J
._ 1_ .
Signature'o Ow er House Number
Signature of Owner House Number
Signature of Owner House Number
We, the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed$1,500.fence spedal assessment at the scheduled
Sept-mber 29, 2015 Board Meeting.
5-Z
Signfure House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
We, the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled
September 29, 2015 Board Meeting.
ai/e,e,t/ • 6-7,3
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
• • •
, We,: the at the::Viii.asof GreenwooOtake,:klabie .FlOtida
areberebyttetitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
1110013110:001)0$0d $1§0(1.. fehce:spetial assessmedt.atthe scheduled
:September Z9:4:.200.110a-1'd Meetings,
•
Signature House
Signature ROUSeNUMber-
Signature RouSe Nurnber
. ...,..., .
. . .
Signature , louse Number
Signatore, House Number
Signature i -Rouse Number
. .
signature S House Number
• • • " •
. . . ... . .
. „ . . . ........: _
5ignature: House Nurriber
Signature. H..oupeNurnb.er
We, the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled
September 29,E 15 Board Meeting.
•
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
We,the homeowners,at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled
Se e er 29,2015 Board Meeting.
CZ: 2----. /
Signature House Number
lS. nature u Ogeopt,e,:e House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
We, the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled
September 29, 2015 Board Meeting.
/I ,ilf,11,-,, / L.Wei,-
JO / --we4 k/ ,d, -, / 9
Signature < House Number
-(--1 v 6.e.--(---- A)--1_/),
,- C-1,146{,fiji
Signatu i House Number
/I4 ((—p L 73
0
Signature House Number
/44 JR/ CE /(.3(11/Z.)4CY fi,4:=1.:_, 0 6e i
Signature House Number
....-- / , 044,6g, /
ill 414.4Li g 4 60/
ignature House Number
1
'f/(11,p ,-i-49 ,,,,( c7 ts--,7
Signature House Number
-7-,),,,z/Le ,f i
. cam S 7 2 3
Signature House Number
t... -- ,5----c9 0 7
Signa - PH.rHouse Number
�� b e39'
*'gnature House Number
We, the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled
September 29, 2015 Board Meeting.
1)77.4-e- /iyi-j4 c5'.5' ea
Signature 4,-____d
House Number
-2V,,,,
/A% r
m/ ,/ /
Sigratur� House er
// j„,..., (//'\_ki-"/ ' S--S aL--
7 "-f
7---
ignoture---pi.___ ----). i 4_, House Number
bs4 i, — 5 („,) c :_
3
Signature 7 House Number
721,,,( ,..,, , rI e-z,,,,____ .5- S. c-R i
S': }aturi' House Number
-Yi9 '\16.,(4;-12-0' 5 -2 g 2
S'::na .re House Number
,y
/ I 3 A /
� 5S g l
Signature 1- House Number
T40./)./4_ --, .5 7 3 9
Sig,ture ,, House Number
1,6" uA�„' 7„.„-
Ro c 7 L: C:
Signature House Number
We,the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled
September 29, 2015 Board Meeting.
%1ket.- , LAc0 56aO
Signature House Number
Mi► / S %
Signature House Number
/51, G 6U &-i t% S-4 /zi
Signature House Number
46 "---(e/4 ( �e —�' 4 /3
Signature House Number
a
/ --5-?:/ 7
ySignat `e / I House Number
Signature House Number
;, st
Sig ture House Number
atur
Ath_AW-a../ '-66 g
' ign / . House Number
J 0r
. House Number
We, the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled
September 29, 2015 Board Meeting.
'-',0 1- 1,,,P, Crg ti
Signatur House Number
1)44."2, .5-S-6D
Signature House Number
6 c32cf2,L. .A4..,_,1„ ,c_,--,- --5 c{
Signature House Number
i , r/-(4)-411,1,44----'' sd'S-71
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
L.4)170 lAt, Oldie S-S-71
Sign ure House Number
;1-14' /
/(:?-1? al -4-( --C-r. -_- --3—74
Signatu$ House Number
PrA.R6-- ‘-____-----_____ ,, ,,
_ 5 - ---
Signature House Number
Signature House Number
We, the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled
September 29, 2015 Board Meeting.
,*10
Si: - .t re
,,./-6
.i
. ,
i 77/ House Number
72.,
Signature House Number
-a/6- .:.<a4,- -Li,,,,,19- ,,S-n, D--
Signature / House Number
a/
, 76 9
Sign/ture
U1//4 House Number
gt6L
7ig
natureHo
use Number
i'
cl -3 /
Siinature -) House Number
6 ,
• id/ w'(--
'
,,,,,, ,, )::,:f
-----
Signature House Number
ik n - 1 '-.
II, 0 .....k.,)(..- ---2 ) 708
Signa i e House Number
---,..
Signature House Number
We, the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled
September 29, 2015 Board Meeting.
---/i:,?:--,--- ,,)--).,/,%",,,,...e.4.‘,e.e, SS 6' /
ignature House Number
Signature House Number
(-) , ectic-142- 0-74------ ,5--\5---- Lt 9
nature House Number
4 ' qdU i 56bp
Signature House Number
Signature,.. /(1.26:4__> //).e,t-24[2,--------,--) 5-6 3--'4.-
n , House Number
1f
, / I / 1 i t, S 6 V
Signatu�f House Number
-,.._,—,Aff
r ? �
Signatur House Number
K
'(4 ^----...&,Q.—c&&E--- c..,--- ..,.,...,_,.4,,_ __.,
Signature House Number
'4
S-13 e ;3.
Signa House Number •
We, the homeowners, at the Villas of Greenwood Lake, Naples, Florida
are hereby petitioning the Board of Directors of aforesaid community to vote
"NO" on the proposed $1,500. fence special assessment at the scheduled
September 29, 2015 Board Meeting.
,..h eco
Signature /2House Number
AIT' f- '.L 2 � I/4.' ,5?o0-+
Signature i House Number
'---91.A.:".. abh0.zit.,... --5—.-7/
Signatur ( House Number
' ' . Y. - -.)....„ ,----- s---7 ,5---0
Signature House Number
r
ignat - House Number
/ j__:" _ ,_ f -.', ( _e) s'c-7 e);?--
Signature House Number
.-•,",,Z--?.- -..../,._ii,-- / ,/. , ,s.:_.,-
Signature House Numl? r
f -‘ ) ' f'
Ctw
Signature t 1 ? House Number
hati Mt MI 7/4
Signature House Number
BrownleeMichael
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:22 PM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW:Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Michelle,
I would prefer that staff handle this one. I think that since the original submission was in writing, that it would be good
to respond in writing as well since it involves the HOA. That way, the message to the board/residents doesn't get lost in
the translation. Please cc us with the correspondence.
Thanks,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239)252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
ver, County
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address reLeased in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by telephone or in writing.
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:13 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
OK-The letter has his phone number. Do you want staff to call him or do you want me to supply you the information
and you call?
Let me know how you wish to handle.
Michelle
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:12 PM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
1
Sorry Michelle,we don't. ... It came in the mail.
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:36 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: FW: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 / FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Do you have the constituents email address by any chance?
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:33 AM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
I sent you the attachment. Please have David reach out to this constituent as well. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
Co r County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:35 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne<JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>
Subject:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
I was not provided the attachment from Brownlee (below),but I think this is what you're asking for-
Attached is the request and below is the last entry into AIMS,let me know if you need more:
AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962- ...Constituent contact made by staff,see summary provided by David Anthony
Senior Environmental Specialist:
I talked with Mr. Stade this afternoon (4/20/16). He said the HoA was looking to put a fence (which as he
described sounded more like a concrete wall) in the Preserve. He asked if they were able to do that. I told
him that fences and walls are not allowed within a Preserve unless part of an approved FWS/FWC wildlife
management plan,but a fence was allowed along the perimeter of a Preserve. I also told him that
decorative walls are required to be set back 5 feet from a Preserve.
Because the Plat for his development shows the Preserve going up to the property boundary,then any
proposed wall there would need to be situated 5 feet beyond the boundary of the property,which
obviously isn't possible.Therefore it was not currently possible to put a wall along that Preserve. Mr. Stade
2
stated the HoA was planning on constructing a wall there. I told him that they would have to get a permit to
build a wall and that those would be issues would be an obstacle to getting the permit.
Mr. Stade thanked me for answering his questions and that ended our conversation. I have put an Alert in
Cityview for the Preserve Tract to ensure an Environmental Review is added for any building permits that
come in for this Tract
In case you need more information,this is a draft which was not placed into AIMS because David Anthony
had already responded with the above summary:
From: ScottChris
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:08 AM
To: WilkieKirsten
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 -Stade/Villas of Greenwood Lake fence permit
Let's get this out today. Below is a draft response, please look over and let me know if you have any edits.
The construction of a berm and wall could not be done within the preserve/conservation area. Walls must be
located a minimum of 5'from the preserve. The Villas of Greenwood Lake (PB 31; PGS 87-90) shows Tract B
extending to County Barn Road along the NE and to Rattlesnake Hammock in the SW corner of the development.
Tract B is identified as a Buffer, Conservation Easement and Drainage Easement.This is consistent with the
Master Plan for the Windsong PUD (Ord. 98-73).
According to the Preserve Management Plan, the following activities are prohibited in the conservation area,
"construction or placing of buildings on or above the ground, dumping or placing soils or other substances such
as trash, removal or destruction of plants, shrubs or other vegetation with the exception of exotic nuisance
vegetation removal, excavation, dredging, or removal of soil material, diking or fencing, and other activities
detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation or preservation, except as permitted by state and
federal activities as applicable."
In order to construct a berm/wall,the Preserve boundary would first need to be modified.This will require
approval by the Board of County Commissioners through a PUD Amendment and vacation of easement. If
approved,the berm/wall would need to be shown on the approved Construction Plans through an Insubstantial
Change (ICP) and a building permit would be required prior to construction.
Christopher 0. Scott,AICP, LEED-AP
Planning Manager-Development Review
239.252.2460
Michelle
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:11 PM
To: BrownleeMichael; FrenchJames
Cc: MarcellaJeanne; ClevelandMarisa; FialaDonna; ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
We've looked into this request previously. Michelle can you find the correspondence related to this request. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
+ fsrCounty
3
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:07 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne <JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>; FialaDonna
<DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>
Subject:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
Gentlemen,
Commissioner Fiala wanted to provide you with this correspondence that was received today via certified mail for your
response.
Respectfully,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg"F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
)cP ?itH v
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send eLectronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by telephone or in writing.
Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send
electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.
4
BrownleeMichael
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:12 PM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW:Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Sorry Michelle, we don't. ... It came in the mail.
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:36 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: FW: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Do you have the constituents email address by any chance?
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:33 AM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 / FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
I sent you the attachment. Please have David reach out to this constituent as well. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
Co ' r County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From:ScavoneMichelle
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:35 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<Iamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne<JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>
Subject:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
I was not provided the attachment from Brownlee (below),but I think this is what you're asking for-
Attached is the request and below is the last entry into AIMS,let me know if you need more:
AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962- ...Constituent contact made by staff,see summary provided by David Anthony
Senior Environmental Specialist:
I talked with Mr. Stade this afternoon (4/20/16). He said the HoA was looking to put a fence (which as he
described sounded more like a concrete wall) in the Preserve. He asked if they were able to do that. I told
1
him that fences and walls are not allowed within a Preserve unless part of an approved FWS/FWC wildlife
management plan,but a fence was allowed along the perimeter of a Preserve. I also told him that
decorative walls are required to be set back 5 feet from a Preserve.
Because the Plat for his development shows the Preserve going up to the property boundary,then any
proposed wall there would need to be situated 5 feet beyond the boundary of the property,which
obviously isn't possible.Therefore it was not currently possible to put a wall along that Preserve. Mr. Stade
stated the HoA was planning on constructing a wall there. I told him that they would have to get a permit to
build a wall and that those would be issues would be an obstacle to getting the permit.
Mr. Stade thanked me for answering his questions and that ended our conversation. I have put an Alert in
Cityview for the Preserve Tract to ensure an Environmental Review is added for any building permits that
come in for this Tract
In case you need more information,this is a draft which was not placed into AIMS because David Anthony
had already responded with the above summary:
From: ScottChris
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:08 AM
To: WilkieKirsten
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 -Stade/Villas of Greenwood Lake fence permit
Let's get this out today. Below is a draft response, please look over and let me know if you have any edits.
The construction of a berm and wall could not be done within the preserve/conservation area. Walls must be
located a minimum of 5' from the preserve. The Villas of Greenwood Lake (PB 31; PGS 87-90) shows Tract B
extending to County Barn Road along the NE and to Rattlesnake Hammock in the SW corner of the development.
Tract B is identified as a Buffer, Conservation Easement and Drainage Easement.This is consistent with the
Master Plan for the Windsong PUD (Ord. 98-73).
According to the Preserve Management Plan,the following activities are prohibited in the conservation area,
"construction or placing of buildings on or above the ground, dumping or placing soils or other substances such
as trash, removal or destruction of plants, shrubs or other vegetation with the exception of exotic nuisance
vegetation removal,excavation, dredging, or removal of soil material, diking or fencing, and other activities
detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation or preservation, except as permitted by state and
federal activities as applicable."
In order to construct a berm/wall,the Preserve boundary would first need to be modified. This will require
approval by the Board of County Commissioners through a PUD Amendment and vacation of easement. If
approved,the berm/wall would need to be shown on the approved Construction Plans through an Insubstantial
Change (ICP) and a building permit would be required prior to construction.
Christopher O. Scott,AICP, LEED-AP
Planning Manager-Development Review
239.252.2460
Michelle
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:11 PM
To: BrownleeMichael; FrenchJames
Cc: MarcellaJeanne; ClevelandMarisa; FialaDonna; ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
2
We've looked into this request previously. Michelle can you find the correspondence related to this request. Thanks.
David S. Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
CO. r County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:07 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne <JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>; FialaDonna
<DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>
Subject:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
Gentlemen,
Commissioner Fiala wanted to provide you with this correspondence that was received today via certified mail for your
response.
Respectfully,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
ter COWAN'
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by teLephone or in writing.
Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send
electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.
3
BrownleeMichael
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:13 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW:Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
OK-The letter has his phone number. Do you want staff to call him or do you want me to supply you the information
and you call?
Let me know how you wish to handle.
Michelle
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:12 PM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Sorry Michelle, we don't. ... It came in the mail.
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:36 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: FW: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Do you have the constituents email address by any chance?
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:33 AM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
I sent you the attachment. Please have David reach out to this constituent as well. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
Co . County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From:ScavoneMichelle
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:35 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne <JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>
Subject:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
I was not provided the attachment from Brownlee (below),but I think this is what you're asking for-
Attached is the request and below is the last entry into AIMS,let me know if you need more:
AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962- ...Constituent contact made by staff,see summary provided by David Anthony
Senior Environmental Specialist:
I talked with Mr. Stade this afternoon (4/20/16). He said the HoA was looking to put a fence (which as he
described sounded more like a concrete wall) in the Preserve. He asked if they were able to do that. I told
him that fences and walls are not allowed within a Preserve unless part of an approved FWS/FWC wildlife
management plan,but a fence was allowed along the perimeter of a Preserve. I also told him that
decorative walls are required to be set back 5 feet from a Preserve.
Because the Plat for his development shows the Preserve going up to the property boundary,then any
proposed wall there would need to be situated 5 feet beyond the boundary of the property,which
obviously isn't possible.Therefore it was not currently possible to put a wall along that Preserve. Mr. Stade
stated the HoA was planning on constructing a wall there. I told him that they would have to get a permit to
build a wall and that those would be issues would be an obstacle to getting the permit.
Mr. Stade thanked me for answering his questions and that ended our conversation. I have put an Alert in
Cityview for the Preserve Tract to ensure an Environmental Review is added for any building permits that
come in for this Tract
In case you need more information,this is a draft which was not placed into AIMS because David Anthony
had already responded with the above summary:
From: ScottChris
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:08 AM
To: WilkieKirsten
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 -Stade/Villas of Greenwood Lake fence permit
Let's get this out today. Below is a draft response, please look over and let me know if you have any edits.
The construction of a berm and wall could not be done within the preserve/conservation area. Walls must be
located a minimum of 5' from the preserve. The Villas of Greenwood Lake (PB 31; PGS 87-90) shows Tract B
extending to County Barn Road along the NE and to Rattlesnake Hammock in the SW corner of the development.
Tract B is identified as a Buffer, Conservation Easement and Drainage Easement.This is consistent with the
Master Plan for the Windsong PUD (Ord. 98-73).
According to the Preserve Management Plan,the following activities are prohibited in the conservation area,
"construction or placing of buildings on or above the ground, dumping or placing soils or other substances such
as trash, removal or destruction of plants, shrubs or other vegetation with the exception of exotic nuisance
vegetation removal, excavation, dredging, or removal of soil material, diking or fencing, and other activities
detrimental to drainage, flood control,water conservation or preservation, except as permitted by state and
federal activities as applicable."
In order to construct a berm/wall, the Preserve boundary would first need to be modified.This will require
approval by the Board of County Commissioners through a PUD Amendment and vacation of easement. If
approved,the berm/wall would need to be shown on the approved Construction Plans through an Insubstantial
Change (ICP) and a building permit would be required prior to construction.
2
Christopher O. Scott,AICP, LEED-AP
Planning Manager-Development Review
239.252.2460
Michelle
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:11 PM
To: BrownleeMichael; FrenchJames
Cc: MarcellaJeanne; ClevelandMarisa; FialaDonna; ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
We've looked into this request previously. Michelle can you find the correspondence related to this request. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
Ccs ` r County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:07 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne<JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>; FialaDonna
<DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>
Subject:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
Gentlemen,
Commissioner Fiala wanted to provide you with this correspondence that was received today via certified mail for your
response.
Respectfully,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239)252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
.fwr County
3
Under FLorida Law, e-mail addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address reLeased in
response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by teLephone or in writing.
Under Florida Law.e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send
electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.
4
BrownleeMichael
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:33 AM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW:Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
I sent you the attachment. Please have David reach out to this constituent as well. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
Co •r County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From:ScavoneMichelle
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:35 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne <JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>
Subject:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
I was not provided the attachment from Brownlee (below),but I think this is what you're asking for-
Attached is the request and below is the last entry into AIMS,let me know if you need more:
AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962- ...Constituent contact made by staff,see summary provided by David Anthony
Senior Environmental Specialist:
I talked with Mr. Stade this afternoon (4/20/16). He said the HoA was looking to put a fence (which as he
described sounded more like a concrete wall) in the Preserve. He asked if they were able to do that. I told
him that fences and walls are not allowed within a Preserve unless part of an approved FWS/FWC wildlife
management plan,but a fence was allowed along the perimeter of a Preserve. I also told him that
decorative walls are required to be set back 5 feet from a Preserve.
Because the Plat for his development shows the Preserve going up to the property boundary,then any
proposed wall there would need to be situated 5 feet beyond the boundary of the property,which
obviously isn't possible.Therefore it was not currently possible to put a wall along that Preserve. Mr. Stade
stated the HoA was planning on constructing a wall there. I told him that they would have to get a permit to
build a wall and that those would be issues would be an obstacle to getting the permit.
Mr. Stade thanked me for answering his questions and that ended our conversation. I have put an Alert in
Cityview for the Preserve Tract to ensure an Environmental Review is added for any building permits that
come in for this Tract
In case you need more information,this is a draft which was not placed into AIMS because David Anthony
had already responded with the above summary:
From: ScottChris
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:08 AM
To: WilkieKirsten
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 -Stade/Villas of Greenwood Lake fence permit
Let's get this out today. Below is a draft response, please look over and let me know if you have any edits.
The construction of a berm and wall could not be done within the preserve/conservation area. Walls must be
located a minimum of 5'from the preserve. The Villas of Greenwood Lake (PB 31; PGS 87-90) shows Tract B
extending to County Barn Road along the NE and to Rattlesnake Hammock in the SW corner of the development.
Tract B is identified as a Buffer, Conservation Easement and Drainage Easement.This is consistent with the
Master Plan for the Windsong PUD (Ord. 98-73).
According to the Preserve Management Plan,the following activities are prohibited in the conservation area,
"construction or placing of buildings on or above the ground, dumping or placing soils or other substances such
as trash, removal or destruction of plants, shrubs or other vegetation with the exception of exotic nuisance
vegetation removal, excavation, dredging, or removal of soil material, diking or fencing, and other activities
detrimental to drainage,flood control, water conservation or preservation, except as permitted by state and
federal activities as applicable."
In order to construct a berm/wall,the Preserve boundary would first need to be modified.This will require
approval by the Board of County Commissioners through a PUD Amendment and vacation of easement. If
approved,the berm/wall would need to be shown on the approved Construction Plans through an Insubstantial
Change (ICP) and a building permit would be required prior to construction.
Christopher O. Scott,AICP, LEED-AP
Planning Manager-Development Review
239.252.2460
Michelle
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:11 PM
To: BrownleeMichael; FrenchJames
Cc: MarcellaJeanne; ClevelandMarisa; FialaDonna; ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
We've looked into this request previously. Michelle can you find the correspondence related to this request. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
#'r County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
2
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:07 PM
To:WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne<JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>; FialaDonna
<DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>
Subject:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
Gentlemen,
Commissioner Fiala wanted to provide you with this correspondence that was received today via certified mail for your
response.
Respectfully,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
ger Ccr pity
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by teLephone or in writing.
Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send
electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.
3
BrownleeMichael
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 10:22 AM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; WilkisonDavid; McLeanMatthew; SmithDaniel;AnthonyDavid;
WilkieKirsten; ScottChris; BellowsRay; BrownAraqueSummer; LevyMichael
Subject: RE:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW:Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Well done!
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 9:39 AM
To: BrownleeMichael
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; WilkisonDavid; McLeanMatthew; SmithDaniel; AnthonyDavid; WilkieKirsten; ScottChris;
BellowsRay; BrownAraqueSummer; LevyMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Michael,
Please see the attached letter that will be mailed today to Mr. Comise.
Thanks
Michelle
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:22 PM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Michelle,
I would prefer that staff handle this one. I think that since the original submission was in writing, that it would be good
to respond in writing as well since it involves the HOA. That way,the message to the board/residents doesn't get lost in
the translation. Please cc us with the correspondence.
Thanks,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
Cotter County
1
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send eLectronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by telephone or in writing.
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:13 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
OK-The letter has his phone number. Do you want staff to call him or do you want me to supply you the information
and you call?
Let me know how you wish to handle.
Michelle
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:12 PM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Sorry Michelle, we don't. ... It came in the mail.
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:36 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: FW: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Do you have the constituents email address by any chance?
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:33 AM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
I sent you the attachment. Please have David reach out to this constituent as well. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
Co - ' County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
2
From:ScavoneMichelle
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:35 PM
To:WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne<JeanneMarcella(a@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>
Subject:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
I was not provided the attachment from Brownlee (below),but I think this is what you're asking for-
Attached is the request and below is the last entry into AIMS,let me know if you need more:
AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962- ...Constituent contact made by staff,see summary provided by David Anthony
Senior Environmental Specialist:
I talked with Mr. Stade this afternoon (4/20/16). He said the HoA was looking to put a fence (which as he
described sounded more like a concrete wall) in the Preserve. He asked if they were able to do that. I told
him that fences and walls are not allowed within a Preserve unless part of an approved FWS/FWC wildlife
management plan,but a fence was allowed along the perimeter of a Preserve. I also told him that
decorative walls are required to be set back 5 feet from a Preserve.
Because the Plat for his development shows the Preserve going up to the property boundary,then any
proposed wall there would need to be situated 5 feet beyond the boundary of the property,which
obviously isn't possible. Therefore it was not currently possible to put a wall along that Preserve. Mr. Stade
stated the HoA was planning on constructing a wall there. I told him that they would have to get a permit to
build a wall and that those would be issues would be an obstacle to getting the permit.
Mr. Stade thanked me for answering his questions and that ended our conversation. I have put an Alert in
Cityview for the Preserve Tract to ensure an Environmental Review is added for any building permits that
come in for this Tract
In case you need more information,this is a draft which was not placed into AIMS because David Anthony
had already responded with the above summary:
From: ScottChris
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:08 AM
To: WilkieKirsten
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 -Stade/Villas of Greenwood Lake fence permit
Let's get this out today. Below is a draft response, please look over and let me know if you have any edits.
The construction of a berm and wall could not be done within the preserve/conservation area. Walls must be
located a minimum of 5'from the preserve. The Villas of Greenwood Lake (PB 31; PGS 87-90) shows Tract B
extending to County Barn Road along the NE and to Rattlesnake Hammock in the SW corner of the development.
Tract B is identified as a Buffer, Conservation Easement and Drainage Easement.This is consistent with the
Master Plan for the Windsong PUD (Ord. 98-73).
According to the Preserve Management Plan,the following activities are prohibited in the conservation area,
"construction or placing of buildings on or above the ground, dumping or placing soils or other substances such
as trash, removal or destruction of plants, shrubs or other vegetation with the exception of exotic nuisance
vegetation removal, excavation, dredging, or removal of soil material, diking or fencing, and other activities
detrimental to drainage,flood control, water conservation or preservation, except as permitted by state and
federal activities as applicable."
In order to construct a berm/wall,the Preserve boundary would first need to be modified.This will require
approval by the Board of County Commissioners through a PUD Amendment and vacation of easement. If
3
approved,the berm/wall would need to be shown on the approved Construction Plans through an Insubstantial
Change (ICP) and a building permit would be required prior to construction.
Christopher O. Scott,AICP, LEED-AP
Planning Manager-Development Review
239.252.2460
Michelle
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:11 PM
To: BrownleeMichael; FrenchJames
Cc: MarcellaJeanne; ClevelandMarisa; FialaDonna; ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
We've looked into this request previously. Michelle can you find the correspondence related to this request. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
Co 1 -r Comity
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent:Tuesday,September 13, 2016 4:07 PM
To:WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<iamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne<JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>; FialaDonna
<DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>
Subject:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
Gentlemen,
Commissioner Fiala wanted to provide you with this correspondence that was received today via certified mail for your
response.
Respectfully,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
4
Co Ter Comar
Under FLorida Law, a-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your a-maiL address reLeased in
response to a pubLic records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by teLephone or in writing.
Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send
electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.
5
BrownleeMichael
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:39 AM
To: WilkisonDavid
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Will do
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:33 AM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
I sent you the attachment. Please have David reach out to this constituent as well. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
• ~'v Courcy
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From:ScavoneMichelle
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:35 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne<JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>
Subject:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
I was not provided the attachment from Brownlee (below),but I think this is what you're asking for-
Attached is the request and below is the last entry into AIMS,let me know if you need more:
AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962- ...Constituent contact made by staff,see summary provided by David Anthony
Senior Environmental Specialist:
I talked with Mr. Stade this afternoon (4/20/16). He said the HoA was looking to put a fence (which as he
described sounded more like a concrete wall) in the Preserve. He asked if they were able to do that. I told
him that fences and walls are not allowed within a Preserve unless part of an approved FWS/FWC wildlife
management plan,but a fence was allowed along the perimeter of a Preserve. I also told him that
decorative walls are required to be set back 5 feet from a Preserve.
Because the Plat for his development shows the Preserve going up to the property boundary,then any
proposed wall there would need to be situated 5 feet beyond the boundary of the property,which
obviously isn't possible.Therefore it was not currently possible to put a wall along that Preserve. Mr. Stade
i
stated the HoA was planning on constructing a wall there. I told him that they would have to get a permit to
build a wall and that those would be issues would be an obstacle to getting the permit.
Mr. Stade thanked me for answering his questions and that ended our conversation. I have put an Alert in
Cityview for the Preserve Tract to ensure an Environmental Review is added for any building permits that
come in for this Tract
In case you need more information,this is a draft which was not placed into AIMS because David Anthony
had already responded with the above summary:
From: ScottChris
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:08 AM
To: WilkieKirsten
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 -Stade/Villas of Greenwood Lake fence permit
Let's get this out today. Below is a draft response, please look over and let me know if you have any edits.
The construction of a berm and wall could not be done within the preserve/conservation area. Walls must be
located a minimum of 5'from the preserve. The Villas of Greenwood Lake (PB 31; PGS 87-90) shows Tract B
extending to County Barn Road along the NE and to Rattlesnake Hammock in the SW corner of the development.
Tract B is identified as a Buffer, Conservation Easement and Drainage Easement.This is consistent with the
Master Plan for the Windsong PUD (Ord. 98-73).
According to the Preserve Management Plan,the following activities are prohibited in the conservation area,
"construction or placing of buildings on or above the ground, dumping or placing soils or other substances such
as trash, removal or destruction of plants, shrubs or other vegetation with the exception of exotic nuisance
vegetation removal, excavation, dredging, or removal of soil material, diking or fencing, and other activities
detrimental to drainage,flood control, water conservation or preservation, except as permitted by state and
federal activities as applicable."
In order to construct a berm/wall,the Preserve boundary would first need to be modified.This will require
approval by the Board of County Commissioners through a PUD Amendment and vacation of easement. If
approved,the berm/wall would need to be shown on the approved Construction Plans through an Insubstantial
Change (ICP) and a building permit would be required prior to construction.
Christopher O. Scott,AICP, LEED-AP
Planning Manager-Development Review
239.252.2460
Michelle
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:11 PM
To: BrownleeMichael; FrenchJames
Cc: MarcellaJeanne; ClevelandMarisa; FialaDonna; ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
We've looked into this request previously. Michelle can you find the correspondence related to this request. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
Co `.r County
2
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:07 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<iamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne<JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>; FialaDonna
<DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>
Subject:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
Gentlemen,
Commissioner Fiala wanted to provide you with this correspondence that was received today via certified mail for your
response.
Respectfully,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
COPter CootaitY
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address reLeased in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by telephone or in writing.
Under Florida Law.e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send
electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.
3
BrownleeMichael
From: LulichPamela
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 1:08 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Cc: FialaDonna; GossardTravis; DelateJoseph
Subject: RE:Villa at Greenwood Lakes/Windsong
Attachments: Letter to Commissioner 06-2018.pdf; 20160913150845904.pdf; Review Comment
Letter.pdf
Categories: Printed
Good afternoon Michael,
I believe this issue is beyond my purview. I would recommend that you contact Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director
or Ray Bellows, Planning Manager for direction.
Sincerely,
Pamela J. Lulich, PLA, CPM
Landscape Operations Manager
Ctfrer County
Road Maintenance Division
Exceeding Expectations Everyday
2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Naples Florida 34104
Phone:239.252.8924 Fax:239.774.6406
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Monday,June 25, 2018 1:41 PM
To: LulichPamela
Cc: FialaDonna
Subject:Villa at Greenwood Lakes/Windsong
Hi Pam,
Please see the attached, a letter to Commissioner Fiala received recently, where she is asking for some advice from you.
This item goes back a few years and I have attached some history, along with the latest activity on the application from
earlier this month.
Regards,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
NOTE: Our County Email Addresses have changed.
My new email address is Cott County
Subscribe to Commissioner Fiala's Newsletter here.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by telephone or in writing.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
2
BrownleeMichael
From: MartinezGilbert
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 2:02 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Cc: BosiMichael; FialaDonna; BellowsRay; FinnTimothy
Subject: RE: Villas at Greenwood Lakes
Mr. Brownlee,
Yes. I will be attending, monitoring and include my observations of the NIM in the staff report.
Also, I spoke with Mr. Comise earlier this week, and he expressed the concerns reported in the letter to Commissioner
Fiala.
Regards,
Gil Martinez,
Principal Planner
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 1:48 PM
To: MartinezGilbert
Cc: BosiMichael ; FialaDonna
Subject:Villas at Greenwood Lakes
Mr. Martinez,
Please see the attached. Will someone from the Planning Department be present at this NIM?
Regards,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
NOTE: Our County Email Addresses have changed.
My new email address is Michael.Brownleec CollierCountyFL.gov
catri*
r C�ou ►
Subscribe to Commissioner Fiala's Newsletter here.
Under Florida Law, a-maiL addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a pubLic records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by telephone or in writing.
1
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
2
BrownleeMichael
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:36 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: FW:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Attachments: 20160913150845904.pdf
Do you have the constituents email address by any chance?
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:33 AM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
I sent you the attachment. Please have David reach out to this constituent as well. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
• • County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:35 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne <JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>
Subject:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
I was not provided the attachment from Brownlee (below),but I think this is what you're asking for-
Attached is the request and below is the last entry into AIMS,let me know if you need more:
AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962- ...Constituent contact made by staff,see summary provided by David Anthony
Senior Environmental Specialist:
I talked with Mr. Stade this afternoon (4/20/16). He said the HoA was looking to put a fence (which as he
described sounded more like a concrete wall) in the Preserve. He asked if they were able to do that. I told
him that fences and walls are not allowed within a Preserve unless part of an approved FWS/FWC wildlife
management plan,but a fence was allowed along the perimeter of a Preserve. I also told him that
decorative walls are required to be set back 5 feet from a Preserve.
Because the Plat for his development shows the Preserve going up to the property boundary,then any
proposed wall there would need to be situated 5 feet beyond the boundary of the property,which
obviously isn't possible.Therefore it was not currently possible to put a wall along that Preserve. Mr. Stade
stated the HoA was planning on constructing a wall there. I told him that they would have to get a permit to
build a wall and that those would be issues would be an obstacle to getting the permit.
Mr. Stade thanked me for answering his questions and that ended our conversation. I have put an Alert in
Cityview for the Preserve Tract to ensure an Environmental Review is added for any building permits that
come in for this Tract
In case you need more information,this is a draft which was not placed into AIMS because David Anthony
had already responded with the above summary:
From: ScottChris
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:08 AM
To: WilkieKirsten
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 -Stade/Villas of Greenwood Lake fence permit
Let's get this out today. Below is a draft response, please look over and let me know if you have any edits.
The construction of a berm and wall could not be done within the preserve/conservation area. Walls must be
located a minimum of 5' from the preserve. The Villas of Greenwood Lake (PB 31; PGS 87-90) shows Tract B
extending to County Barn Road along the NE and to Rattlesnake Hammock in the SW corner of the development.
Tract B is identified as a Buffer, Conservation Easement and Drainage Easement.This is consistent with the
Master Plan for the Windsong PUD (Ord. 98-73).
According to the Preserve Management Plan,the following activities are prohibited in the conservation area,
"construction or placing of buildings on or above the ground, dumping or placing soils or other substances such
as trash, removal or destruction of plants, shrubs or other vegetation with the exception of exotic nuisance
vegetation removal, excavation, dredging, or removal of soil material, diking or fencing, and other activities
detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation or preservation, except as permitted by state and
federal activities as applicable."
In order to construct a berm/wall,the Preserve boundary would first need to be modified.This will require
approval by the Board of County Commissioners through a PUD Amendment and vacation of easement. If
approved,the berm/wall would need to be shown on the approved Construction Plans through an Insubstantial
Change (ICP) and a building permit would be required prior to construction.
Christopher O. Scott,AICP, LEED-AP
Planning Manager-Development Review
239.252.2460
Michelle
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:11 PM
To: BrownleeMichael; FrenchJames
Cc: MarcellaJeanne; ClevelandMarisa; FialaDonna; ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
We've looked into this request previously. Michelle can you find the correspondence related to this request. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
2
• #'r County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:07 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrencht colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne <JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>; FialaDonna
<DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>
Subject:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
Gentlemen,
Commissioner Fiala wanted to provide you with this correspondence that was received today via certified mail for your
response.
Respectfully,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
tCr.Con fay
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address reLeased in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by telephone or in writing.
Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send
electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.
3
BrownleeMichael
Subject: NIM 37.6 acre property at County Barn & Rattlesnake Hammock
Location: - Villas at Greenwood Lake Clubhouse
Start: Thu 2/9/2017 5:30 PM
End: Thu 2/9/2017 7:00 PM
Recurrence: (none)
Organizer: FialaDonna
1
BrownleeMichael
I 111
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:11 PM
To: BrownleeMichael; FrenchJames
Cc: MarcellaJeanne; Cleveland Marisa; FialaDonna; ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE:Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
We've looked into this request previously. Michelle can you find the correspondence related to this request. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
C:o er County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:07 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne <JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>; FialaDonna
<DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>
Subject:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
Gentlemen,
Commissioner Fiala wanted to provide you with this correspondence that was received today via certified mail for your
response.
Respectfully,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
Cooties County
1
Under FLorida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address released in
response to a pubLic records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by teLephone or in writing.
Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send
electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.
2
BrownleeMichael
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:26 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW:Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
OK-I will have staff write something up and mail out with a cc to you.
Michelle
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:22 PM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 / FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Michelle,
I would prefer that staff handle this one. I think that since the original submission was in writing, that it would be good
to respond in writing as well since it involves the HOA. That way, the message to the board/residents doesn't get lost in
the translation. Please cc us with the correspondence.
Thanks,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
agrak
Cao i r County
Under Florida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by telephone or in writing.
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:13 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
1
OK-The letter has his phone number. Do you want staff to call him or do you want me to supply you the information
and you call?
Let me know how you wish to handle.
Michelle
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:12 PM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Sorry Michelle, we don't. ... It came in the mail.
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:36 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: FW: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Do you have the constituents email address by any chance?
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:33 AM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
I sent you the attachment. Please have David reach out to this constituent as well. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
Co r County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From:ScavoneMichelle
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:35 PM
To:WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<iamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne <JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>
Subject:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
I was not provided the attachment from Brownlee (below),but I think this is what you're asking for-
Attached is the request and below is the last entry into AIMS,let me know if you need more:
AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962- ...Constituent contact made by staff,see summary provided by David Anthony
Senior Environmental Specialist:
2
I talked with Mr. Stade this afternoon (4/20/16). He said the HoA was looking to put a fence (which as he
described sounded more like a concrete wall) in the Preserve. He asked if they were able to do that. I told
him that fences and walls are not allowed within a Preserve unless part of an approved FWS/FWC wildlife
management plan,but a fence was allowed along the perimeter of a Preserve. I also told him that
decorative walls are required to be set back 5 feet from a Preserve.
Because the Plat for his development shows the Preserve going up to the property boundary,then any
proposed wall there would need to be situated 5 feet beyond the boundary of the property,which
obviously isn't possible.Therefore it was not currently possible to put a wall along that Preserve. Mr. Stade
stated the HoA was planning on constructing a wall there. I told him that they would have to get a permit to
build a wall and that those would be issues would be an obstacle to getting the permit.
Mr. Stade thanked me for answering his questions and that ended our conversation. I have put an Alert in
Cityview for the Preserve Tract to ensure an Environmental Review is added for any building permits that
come in for this Tract
In case you need more information,this is a draft which was not placed into AIMS because David Anthony
had already responded with the above summary:
From: ScottChris
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:08 AM
To: WilkieKirsten
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 -Stade/Villas of Greenwood Lake fence permit
Let's get this out today. Below is a draft response, please look over and let me know if you have any edits.
The construction of a berm and wall could not be done within the preserve/conservation area. Walls must be
located a minimum of 5'from the preserve. The Villas of Greenwood Lake (PB 31; PGS 87-90) shows Tract B
extending to County Barn Road along the NE and to Rattlesnake Hammock in the SW corner of the development.
Tract B is identified as a Buffer, Conservation Easement and Drainage Easement.This is consistent with the
Master Plan for the Windsong PUD (Ord. 98-73).
According to the Preserve Management Plan,the following activities are prohibited in the conservation area,
"construction or placing of buildings on or above the ground, dumping or placing soils or other substances such
as trash, removal or destruction of plants, shrubs or other vegetation with the exception of exotic nuisance
vegetation removal, excavation, dredging, or removal of soil material, diking or fencing, and other activities
detrimental to drainage,flood control, water conservation or preservation, except as permitted by state and
federal activities as applicable."
In order to construct a berm/wall,the Preserve boundary would first need to be modified.This will require
approval by the Board of County Commissioners through a PUD Amendment and vacation of easement. If
approved,the berm/wall would need to be shown on the approved Construction Plans through an Insubstantial
Change (ICP) and a building permit would be required prior to construction.
Christopher 0. Scott,AICP, LEED-AP
Planning Manager-Development Review
239.252.2460
Michelle
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:11 PM
To: BrownleeMichael; FrenchJames
3
Cc: MarcellaJeanne; ClevelandMarisa; FialaDonna; ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
We've looked into this request previously. Michelle can you find the correspondence related to this request. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
CO { r County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:07 PM
To:WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne<JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>; FialaDonna
<DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>
Subject:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
Gentlemen,
Commissioner Fiala wanted to provide you with this correspondence that was received today via certified mail for your
response.
Respectfully,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
• icr County
Under Florida Law, a-maiL addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by telephone or in writing.
Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send
electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.
4
BrownleeMichael
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 9:39 AM
To: BrownleeMichael
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna;WilkisonDavid; McLeanMatthew; SmithDaniel;AnthonyDavid;
WilkieKirsten; ScottChris; BellowsRay; BrownAraqueSummer; LevyMichael
Subject: RE:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW:Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Attachments: Comise - Villas of Greenwood Lakes.doc; 20160913150845904.pdf
Categories: Printed
Michael,
Please see the attached letter that will be mailed today to Mr. Comise.
Thanks
Michelle
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:22 PM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Michelle,
I would prefer that staff handle this one. I think that since the original submission was in writing, that it would be good
to respond in writing as well since it involves the HOA. That way, the message to the board/residents doesn't get lost in
the translation. Please cc us with the correspondence.
Thanks,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownleePcolliergov.net
-ter Coin
Under Florida law, e-maiL addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address reLeased in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by teLephone or in writing.
1
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:13 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 / FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
OK-The letter has his phone number. Do you want staff to call him or do you want me to supply you the information
and you call?
Let me know how you wish to handle.
Michelle
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:12 PM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Sorry Michelle, we don't. ... It came in the mail.
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:36 PM
To: BrownleeMichael
Subject: FW: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Do you have the constituents email address by any chance?
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:33 AM
To: ScavoneMichelle
Cc: FrenchJames; FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
I sent you the attachment. Please have David reach out to this constituent as well. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
Cor
County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: ScavoneMichelle
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:35 PM
To: WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne<JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>
Subject:AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962/ FW: Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
2
I was not provided the attachment from Brownlee (below),but I think this is what you're asking for-
Attached is the request and below is the last entry into AIMS,let me know if you need more:
AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962- ...Constituent contact made by staff,see summary provided by David Anthony
Senior Environmental Specialist:
I talked with Mr. Stade this afternoon (4/20/16). He said the HoA was looking to put a fence (which as he
described sounded more like a concrete wall) in the Preserve. He asked if they were able to do that. I told
him that fences and walls are not allowed within a Preserve unless part of an approved FWS/FWC wildlife
management plan, but a fence was allowed along the perimeter of a Preserve. I also told him that
decorative walls are required to be set back 5 feet from a Preserve.
Because the Plat for his development shows the Preserve going up to the property boundary,then any
proposed wall there would need to be situated 5 feet beyond the boundary of the property,which
obviously isn't possible.Therefore it was not currently possible to put a wall along that Preserve. Mr. Stade
stated the HoA was planning on constructing a wall there. I told him that they would have to get a permit to
build a wall and that those would be issues would be an obstacle to getting the permit.
Mr. Stade thanked me for answering his questions and that ended our conversation. I have put an Alert in
Cityview for the Preserve Tract to ensure an Environmental Review is added for any building permits that
come in for this Tract
In case you need more information,this is a draft which was not placed into AIMS because David Anthony
had already responded with the above summary:
From: ScottChris
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:08 AM
To: WilkieKirsten
Subject: RE: AIMS 6178 DEVLP 5962 -Stade/Villas of Greenwood Lake fence permit
Let's get this out today. Below is a draft response, please look over and let me know if you have any edits.
The construction of a berm and wall could not be done within the preserve/conservation area. Walls must be
located a minimum of 5'from the preserve. The Villas of Greenwood Lake (PB 31; PGS 87-90) shows Tract B
extending to County Barn Road along the NE and to Rattlesnake Hammock in the SW corner of the development.
Tract B is identified as a Buffer, Conservation Easement and Drainage Easement.This is consistent with the
Master Plan for the Windsong PUD (Ord. 98-73).
According to the Preserve Management Plan,the following activities are prohibited in the conservation area,
"construction or placing of buildings on or above the ground, dumping or placing soils or other substances such
as trash, removal or destruction of plants, shrubs or other vegetation with the exception of exotic nuisance
vegetation removal, excavation, dredging, or removal of soil material, diking or fencing, and other activities
detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation or preservation, except as permitted by state and
federal activities as applicable."
In order to construct a berm/wall,the Preserve boundary would first need to be modified.This will require
approval by the Board of County Commissioners through a PUD Amendment and vacation of easement. If
approved,the berm/wall would need to be shown on the approved Construction Plans through an Insubstantial
Change (ICP) and a building permit would be required prior to construction.
Christopher O. Scott,AICP, LEED-AP
Planning Manager-Development Review
3
239.252.2460
Michelle
From: WilkisonDavid
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:11 PM
To: BrownleeMichael; FrenchJames
Cc: MarcellaJeanne; ClevelandMarisa; FialaDonna; ScavoneMichelle
Subject: RE: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
We've looked into this request previously. Michelle can you find the correspondence related to this request. Thanks.
David S.Wilkison, P.E.
Department Head
CO 'r County
Growth Management Department
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
239.252.6064(Office)
www.colliergov.net
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:07 PM
To:WilkisonDavid <DavidWilkison@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Cc: MarcellaJeanne <JeanneMarcella@colliergov.net>; ClevelandMarisa <MarisaCleveland@colliergov.net>; FialaDonna
<DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>
Subject:Villas of Greenwood Lakes- Fence
Gentlemen,
Commissioner Fiala wanted to provide you with this correspondence that was received today via certified mail for your
response.
Respectfully,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
ger Count)?
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your a-maiL address released in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by telephone or in writing.
4
Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send
electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.
5
BrownleeMichael
Subject: Villas at Greenwood Lakes NIM
Location: Clubhouse
Start: Tue 9/11/2018 6:00 PM
End: Tue 9/11/2018 7:00 PM
Recurrence: (none)
Organizer: FialaDonna
NEIGHBORHOOLI
INFORMATION MEETING
Petition P120160001023, Windsong PUD
The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting
held by Thomas D.Barber,AICP,of Agnoli,Barber&Brundage,Inc.,
representing Villas at Greenwood Lake Homeowners Association,
Inc.on:
Tuesday, September 11,2018 at 6 p.m. at
Villas at Greenwood Lake Clubhouse,
5843 Greenwood Circle,Naples,FL 34113
Subject Property:Villas at Greenwood Lake,located at the intersection
of County Barn Road and Rattlesnake Hammock Road.
I Paws 91Y0
g p'
TIS 1 PROJECT
LOCATION
t
I.w+-
u`iniea`an: Fi
Q RaEdssnNae Hammock RD
The property owner is petitioning Collier County to vacate a
conservation easement from the property to allow the construction of
a privacy wall along County Barn Road. The portion of conservation
easement to be vacated will be replaced with a larger area on the site.
WE VALUE YOUR INPUT
Business and property owners,residents and visitors are welcome to
attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner and
Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but
have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone,
fax or e-mail to:
Thomas 1). Barber. AJCP
1
BrownleeMichael
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:07 PM
To: WilkisonDavid; FrenchJames
Cc: MarcellaJeanne; Cleveland Marisa; Fiala Donna
Subject: Villas of Greenwood Lakes - Fence
Attachments: 20160913150845904.pdf
Gentlemen,
Commissioner Fiala wanted to provide you with this correspondence that was received today via certified mail for your
response.
Respectfully,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239)252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
MichaelBrownlee@colliergov.net
Caor County
Under Florida Law, e-maiL addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by telephone or in writing.
1
BrownleeMichael
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 1:48 PM
To: MartinezGilbert
Cc: BosiMichael; FialaDonna
Subject: Villas at Greenwood Lakes
Attachments: 20180824135305241.pdf
Mr. Martinez,
Please see the attached. Will someone from the Planning Department be present at this NIM?
Regards,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
NOTE: Our County Email Addresses have changed.
My new email address is Michael.Brownlee@CollierCountyFL.gov
C.,001° Couv
Subscribe to Commissioner Fiala's Newsletter here.
Under FLorida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address reLeased in
response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by teLephone or in writing.
1
BrownleeMichael
From: BrownleeMichael
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 1:41 PM
To: LulichPamela
Cc: FialaDonna
Subject: Villa at Greenwood Lakes/Windsong
Attachments: Letter to Commissioner 06-2018.pdf; 20160913150845904.pdf; Review Comment
Letter.pdf
Hi Pam,
Please see the attached, a letter to Commissioner Fiala received recently, where she is asking for some advice from you.
This item goes back a few years and I have attached some history, along with the latest activity on the application from
earlier this month.
Regards,
Michael Brownlee
Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building- Bldg"F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239) 252-6578
NOTE: Our County Email Addresses have changed.
My new email address is Michael.Brownlee@CollierCountyFL.gov
it*
Subscribe to Commissioner Fiala's Newsletter here.
Under FLorida Law, e-mail addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this
office by teLephone or in writing.
1