Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 12/11/2018 Item #17E
12/11/2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 1989-12 and Ordinance Number 81-43, the Youth Haven Planned Unit Development, by adding group housing for seniors as a permitted use, by adding 10 beds for a maximum of 250 group housing beds, and adding acreage; by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 1± acres of land zoned RMF-6 (3) to the Youth Haven Community Facility Planned Unit Development; by amending the master plan and revising developer commitments. The property is located on the south side of Whitaker Road west of Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 25± acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20180000646] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff’s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The Youth Haven PUD was originally approved by the Board in Ordinance Number 81-43 on September 1, 1981. It was amended by Ordinance Number 89-12 on February 28, 1989, to add 1-acre into the PUD. The Youth Haven PUD is a partially developed 25-acre institutional project that permits group housing uses for children. The Youth Haven PUD currently allows 240 group housing beds. The petitioner is proposing to add a 1- acre RMF-6 zoned parcel to the Youth Haven PUD, to add 10 additional beds for a maximum of 250 group housing beds, and to permit group housing uses for senior adults aged 55 years and older. Modifications to the PUD Document include: - addition of a minimum lot size of 1 acre and a minimum lot width of 85 feet; - the requirement of a preservation area of 2.36 acres; - specifying that the water distribution system shall be looped; - addition of PUD monitoring requirements; - addition of Senior Independent Living Unit requirements; - removal of an existing 60-foot wide berm and swale located along the south-east property line which results in a reduction from a 60-foot setback to a 40-foot setback in the subject area; - establishment of a transportation trip count maximum; and - removal of old citations and inapplicable language The Master Plan has also been updated to reflect the proposed changes. See attachment: Proposed Ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD Rezone by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build-out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD Rezone is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. 17.E Packet Pg. 3635 12/11/2018 The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUDR and has found it consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. See attachment: FLUE Consistency Review. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC, heard Petition PUDR-PL20180000646, Youth Haven PUD on November 15, 2018. The CCPC voted 6-0 to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. PUD Section 2.10, add the word “the” before the strike outs. 2. PUD Section 3.05, add the words “FOR RESIDENTS AND GUESTS OF THIS PUD.” 3. Add language to the PUD stating that senior housing principal and accessory setbacks from the southern property line will be 40 feet; building heights will be 35 feet zoned height and 45 feet actual height. 4. Remove PUD Sections 4.05 and 4.06. 5. PUD Section 4.07 and Exhibit B, change the second 6-month reference to 12-months. 6. Master Plan, add Administrative Variance AVA-2008-AR-13687 subscript for an enhanced buffer in place of a wall to existing area buffer reference along Whitaker Road and the south property line. The requested revisions have been made. See attachment: PUD Ordinance. There have been no letters of objection received. Therefore, this petition has been placed on the Summary Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an amendment to the existing Youth Haven PUD. The burden falls upon the applicant for the amendment to prove that the proposal is consistent with all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board, should it consider denial, that such denial is not arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria. Criteria for PUD Amendments Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or 17.E Packet Pg. 3636 12/11/2018 other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot (“reasonably”) be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a “core” question…) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented 17.E Packet Pg. 3637 12/11/2018 through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC and further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for Petition PUDR-PL20180000646, Youth Haven PUD. Prepared by: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (PDF) 2. Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (PDF) 3. Attachment C-Location Map (PDF) 4. Attachment D- Intentionally Omitted (DOCX) 5. Attachment E-FLUE Consistency Review 8-13-18 (PDF) 6. Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (PDF) 7. [Linked] Attachment G- Application for Youth Haven (PDF) 8. Legal Ad - Agenda #7306 (PDF) 17.E Packet Pg. 3638 12/11/2018 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.E Doc ID: 7306 Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 1989-12 and Ordinance Number 81-43, the Youth Haven Planned Unit Development, by adding group housing for seniors as a permitted use, by adding 10 beds for a maximum of 250 group housing beds, and adding acreage; by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 1± acres of land zoned RMF -6 (3) to the Youth Haven Community Facility Planned Unit Development; by amending the master plan and revising developer commitments. The property is located on the south side of Whitaker Road west of Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 25± acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20180000646] Meeting Date: 12/11/2018 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Nancy Gundlach 11/16/2018 9:48 AM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 11/16/2018 9:48 AM Approved By: Review: Zoning Michael Bosi Additional Reviewer Completed 11/16/2018 1:41 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 11/16/2018 6:14 PM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 11/20/2018 9:35 AM Growth Management Department James C French Additional Reviewer Completed 11/20/2018 12:13 PM Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Additional Reviewer Completed 11/27/2018 1:06 PM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 11/27/2018 3:31 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 CAO Completed 11/27/2018 4:20 PM County Attorney's Office Emily Pepin CAO Preview Completed 11/27/2018 4:43 PM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 11/28/2018 8:32 AM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 12/03/2018 9:47 AM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 12/11/2018 9:00 AM 17.E Packet Pg. 3639 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3640 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3641 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3642 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3643 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3644 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3645 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3646 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3647 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3648 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3649 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3650 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3651 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3652 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3653 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.1 Packet Pg. 3654 Attachment: Attachment A-Staff Report- Youth Haven Final w sig's 11-6-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3655 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3656 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3657 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3658 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3659 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3660 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3661 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3662 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3663 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3664 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3665 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3666 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3667 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3668 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3669 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3670 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3671 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3672 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3673 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3674 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3675 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3676 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3677 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3678 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3679 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3680 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3681 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.2 Packet Pg. 3682 Attachment: Attachment B-Ordinance - 11-19-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) LELY PALMSOF NAPLES YOUTH HAVEN SEACREST UPPER& LOWER SCHOOLS FALLINGWATERS HUNTINGTONWOODS WATERFORDESTATES COOK PROPERTY, THE LELY COUNTRYCLUB MANDALAY RIVIERAGOLFESTATES ROYALWOODSG&C CLUB SHADOW WOOD WINDSONG LELYRESORT FREESTATE TAORMINARESERVE MPUD COPE RESERVE ONYXRPUD COUNTYBARN ROADRPUD County Barn RDRattlesnake Hammock RDSanta Barbara BLVDX2 X26 X65 X66 X54 X63 X42X9 X68 X67 X8X25 X40X71 X88 X14 X92 X55 X14.1 X69 X41 X47 X68 X46X14 X24 X58 X23 X17 X46 À1 À3 À4 À5À2À1 À1.2 À6 À7 À9À8 À10 À11 À12 À13 À14 À1 X56.1 À1À15 À16 À17 À1 À18 À19 X2À20 À1 X56 À21 À22 À23 X56.2 X140 À24 À1.1 À25 À57 X3 À1.1 À26 À56 À1 À1.2 À1 À2 À1.1 À1 X192 X59X60 YOUTH HAVEN TRACT N G F E AMBERLYVILLAGEPHASE II A J TRACT A I H CRANBROO K CO LONYI CONDO A D GTRACT N TRACT BB B AMBERLY VILLAGEPHASE I F E C D C D E COBBLESTONECOURT I C F CTRACT C B BLOOMFIELD RIDGECONDO B TRACT NTRACT N G TRACT D D A Rec Parcel G TRACT PTRACT NG TRACT NTRACT N OR 4342 PG 3989OR 4318 PG 1222CONSRV ESMTOR 4449 PG 2051.06AC COBBLESTONECOURT II CRANBROO K CO LONYII CONDO CU PU PDI PUDPUD E PUD RMF-6 RMF-6(3) PUD PUD A A A RPUD YOUTH HAVEN FALLINGWATERS WATERFORDESTATES ROYAL WOODSG&C CLUB ONYXRPUD Location Map Zoning Map Petition Number: PL20180000646 PROJEC TLOCATION SITELOCATION ¹ 17.E.3 Packet Pg. 3683 Attachment: Attachment C-Location Map (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Attachment D has been intentionally omitted. 17.E.4 Packet Pg. 3684 Attachment: Attachment D- Intentionally Omitted (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) ‒ 1 ‒ Growth Management Department Zoning Division C O N S I S T E N C Y R E V I E W M E M O R A N D U M To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: August 13, 2018 Subject: Consistency Review of Proposed Planned Unit Development to Planned Unit Development Rezone Petition PETITION NUMBER: PL20180000646 [Rev:2] PETITION NAME: Youth Haven Planned Unit Development (PUD)-to-PUD Rezone (PUDR) REQUEST: This petition requests a PUD-to-PUD rezone to the 24-acre Youth Haven PUD, and a rezone for a parcel zoned RMF-6(3) to: add a 1-acre parcel to the PUD bringing the total to ±25 acres; change the density to allow a maximum of 250 individuals consisting of both children and senior adult individuals to be housed in group care facilities; utilize the additional acreage for stormwater management and buffering from Santa Barbara Blvd. LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of ±25 acres, is located south of Whitaker Rd., north of Royal Wood Blvd., and west of Santa Barbara Blvd., in Section 17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is designated Urban ‒ Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict as identified on the Future Land Use Map within the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Relevant to this petition, Policy 5.10 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) states “Group Housing, which may include the following: Family Care Facility, Group Care Facility, Care Units, Assisted Living Facility, and Nursing Home, shall be allowed within the Urban designated area, and may be allowed in other future land use designations, subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code …and consistent with the locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.).” Also relevant to this petition, main Urban Designation provisions of the FLUE state, “Urban designated areas will accommodate… Community facilities such as churches, group housing uses, cemeteries, schools and school facilities co-located with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers, where feasible and mutually acceptable.” Youth Haven is presently a 24-acre PUD allowing Group Care Facilities and other uses comparable in nature with a maximum density of 10 children per acre and additional support staff as necessary. This PUD rezone involves an acreage expansion, incorporating a residual parcel remaining following improvements made to Santa Barbara Blvd. 17.E.5 Packet Pg. 3685 Attachment: Attachment E-FLUE Consistency Review 8-13-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) ‒ 2 ‒ FLUE Policy 5.6 requires new development to be compatible with, and complementary to, surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, as amended). Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. The County recognizes Smart Growth policies and practices in its consideration of future land use arrangements and choice-making options. FLUE Objective 7 and Policies 7.1 through 7.4 promote Smart Growth policies for new development and redevelopment projects pertaining to access, interconnections, open space, and walkable communities. No individual changes are proposed by this PUD rezone to access, interconnection or sidewalk provisions, and the PUD must comply with open space requirements of the LDC. These Policies were not addressed at the time of original approval in 1989, as they were not adopted until 2004. However, it appears that no changes are proposed to pertinent PUD provisions, and analysis by staff is unnecessary. Review of PUD Document Statement of Compliance, and Section IV, General Development Commitments [revisions, dated 6-22- 2018], describe the PUD’s consistency with the Growth Management Plan, and meet other requirements of the LDC. • Proposed PUD Revisions, Statement of Compliance, is revised to describe compliance with current FLUE and other GMP Elements. • Proposed PUD Revisions, General Development Commitments, is revised to provide compliance with Section 5.05.04 of the LDC, for Group Housing, Emergency Environmental Control Plans. No other revisions to the PUD document held Comprehensive Planning implications. CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, this proposed PUD-to-PUD rezone may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Services Section David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division G: Comp\Consistency Reviews\2018 G:\CDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews\2018\PUDR\PUDR-PL2018-646 Youth Haven R2_FNL.docx 17.E.5 Packet Pg. 3686 Attachment: Attachment E-FLUE Consistency Review 8-13-18 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 1 of 24 Sharon: Wait. Okay. Wayne: Alright. I’m gonna go ahead and open up the neighborhood information meeting and my name is Wayne Arnold and I’m a – [Crosstalk] Female Speaker 1: Still can’t hear [inaudible] [00:00:07} Wayne: – professional planner with Q Grady Minor Associates and we’re here representing Maple Select tonight and they are the Applicant for the project. And this is Bill Henry who’s with Maple Select senior development. We have Richard Yovanovich who’s our Land Use Counsel who’s sitting here in a white shirt. Uh. Sharon Umpenhour is taping the meeting and she’s with my office. And This is Norm Trebilcock the transportation engineer from Trebilcock Planning Solutions. So, we’re here representing Youth Haven and we’re proposing an amendment to the Youth Haven planning of development. Uh. If you live in Royalwood, it’s your neighbor immediately north. It’s been there for many years now. And currently, it only allows for youth, um, youth housing. We’re asking the county to allow us to also have senior adult housing as a component of what they do. And they are adding to the planning of development about an acre of property that was a little remainder track that was part of the Santa Barbara widening. And so, it’ll bring our total acreage up about 2 5 total acres and we’re gonna add a provision to go up to 250 beds. Right now, the PUD is about – allows 240 beds because it’s 24 acres in size. So, we’re gonna add an acre. 25 acres and it’s ten beds per acre. So, it’ll be a total of 250 total beds that will be permitted. Pat: Is your mic on? Helen: [Inaudible] is the mic on? Wayne: Well, it sounds – sounds like it. [Crosstalk] Female Speaker 2: Put the mic up. Male Speaker 1: Might wanna go back to the other one. 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3687 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 2 of 24 Wayne: I was gonna. Let me try to go to the other one. Female Speaker 2: Yeah. And I think you’re not gonna wanna stand right in front of the screen there. Wayne: [Inaudible] [00:01:47]. Male Speaker 2: Then – Female Speaker 2: Oh. It’s because you’re in [inaudible]. Wayne: I’ve got to stand somewhere where I’m not under the speaker. So, let me find a spot so it’s not so crazy Female Speaker 1: That’s better. Wayne: Is that any better? Pat: Yes. Wayne: And I forgot to introduce Ray Bellows. Ray Bellows is with Collier County government and Ray’s a principle – well, he’s actually in charge of zoning. He’s filling in for the principle planner that’s handling the case tonight. So, Ray’s here if you have any questions of the county or the county process. So – lost my. [Inaudible]. So, this is, uh, an exhibit that shows the Youth Haven property boundaries within [inaudible]. Sharon: You might wanna stand back that way. Wayne: So, you can see the little parcel on the – whoops. [Inaudible]. The parcel is gonna be adjacent to – I don’t like this microphone. So, the parcel we’re having is a small one-acre parcel. Oh. Wow. That’s not good. Sharon: You’re just gonna have to talk really loud. Male Speaker 3: You’ve got our attention. Sharon: Just use this and talk really loud. Wayne: I know. I just – Male Speaker 1: You gotta eat the mic. Male Speaker 4: Yeah. You gotta put it right – 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3688 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 3 of 24 Wayne: Yeah. I think I’m gonna have to do that. Is that any better? [Crosstalk] Female Speaker 1: Yes. That’s fine. Wayne: Okay. Thanks. I’m gonna stand over this way so everybody can see. So, we’re adding a one-acre piece and Norm’s gonna point to that for us. It’s right there right against Santa Barbara. It’s a little angular piece of property. And then, we’re adding that to the overall Youth Haven. And you can see on the aerial photograph the limits of Youth Haven’s development to date. And then, of course, to the south is your Royalwood Country Club with, um, your roadway and your buffer. This is a tighter aerial of the site that shows, um the project. And Norm, do you want to highlights where the senior housing components likely to go just give everybody an orientation for that? And then, this is the approved master plan for Youth Haven and it depicts, all the way on the east side, a variety of units that are allowed to be developed under the current master plan. As part of this process, we’re adopting a new master plan for the project, which would look like this. And the Youth Haven and its operations are being highlighted right now by Norm on this screen. Then we’ll have a preserve area of vegetation that will be recorded for the county’s benefit. And then, the senior housing component is proposed to be located on the eastern side of the project. And the area that we’re adding, the one- acre, is largely going to be lake and buffer area, as you can see, not entirely, but largely, there will be a water management lake on that side adjacent to the county’s canal. So, that’s our master plan. Pat Bednar: Where is Royalwood on there? For those of us that are not good with maps. Wayne: There’s Royalwood Blvd. Pat: Okay. Wayne: Just south of the existing property boundary. Pat: Okay. Right there. 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3689 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 4 of 24 Wayne: And so, there’re single-family homes along that tier of Royalwood’s. And then, you golf maintenance facility is actually – you go back to an aerial. You can see your golf maintenance area right there that’s adjacent to – Male Speaker 1: There’s a road. [Crosstalk] Wayne: So, the county is part of this amendment process. We’re adding the provision for the senior component and increasing the number of beds by ten. We’re adding one acre of property. We’re also doing some other various cleanups that the county has asked us to do. That’s – the County Attorney’s Office has asked us to do some new updated language because the original project was approved back in 1988, so a lot of the old standards and comments are not applicable today. So, we’re trying to clean up those documents. But largely, I think I’ve highlighted the basic changes we’re proposing to make to the project. Pat: Are there 240 beds in Youth Haven now? Wayne: I don’t believe there are 240 beds there today. They’re allowed to put in up to 240 beds. They’ve been phasing the project over the years and – Pat: And how many are there now? Wayne: I’m sorry – Sharon: Can you state your name for the record? Wayne: One thing. Can I get everybody who wants to ask a question to state your name? Pat: Sure. Wayne: And ask the question loudly so we can get it recorded, please. Pat: Pat Bednar. How many beds are at Youth Haven now? Wayne: I don’t know exactly. We do have Youth Haven representatives here who might know the answer. Pat: Well, they should know. 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3690 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 5 of 24 Joyce Zirkle: 73 [inaudible] [00:06:05] beds. Joyce: 73. Wayne: The answer was, for the record, 73 licensed beds. Pat: So, how many beds are you planning? [Crosstalk] Wayne: We have approximately 96 beds that are planned for the senior component. Pat: Mm-hmm. Wayne: Youth Haven will continue to develop, uh, potential other structures and beds as they continue to develop, but we have a maximum of 250 beds that would be allowed under the revised approvals. Pat: And so, how many units are you gonna have there? I mean, one building or what’s gonna – Wayne: Well, it’s probably gonna be a variety of – of buildings. The – they’re probably gonna be a little bit larger than the Youth Haven buildings that have been built, but I think your planning – your initial plans show four buildings built. Three – Bill Henry: Three residential buildings and one administrative building for a total of about 60,000 square feet. Pat: And when you say – Female Speaker 2: [Inaudible]. Pat: When you say residential, the population will be what? Bill: So, the 96 – the 96 beds – the 90 – this is Bill Henry with Naples Select. Pat: Yeah. Bill: So, the residential buildings will have all of the residential units and the administrative building will house administrative staff. 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3691 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 6 of 24 Pat: What – well, who are the residents? That’s my question. Wayne: This is a specialty Alzheimer’s care project. Helen: Ah. Thank you. Wayne: Most of our residents will be in their mid-eighties. All of them will have been diagnosed with, um, various stages of memory care issues. Helen: Okay. Pat: Now, we had originally, like months ago, heard there was gonna be a dementia unit across and that that fell through. Is this a different plan or is this the same plan? Male Speaker 1: Well, dementia is – Bill: I would assume it’s the same plan. I mean, we’ve been working on for quite a while. Pat: Okay. Okay. Wayne: Thanks, Bill. Helen: I have one question. My name is Helen Philman. Did you say 96 beds for memory care? Bill: Correct. Helen: And what about the youth? How many beds will be – for all the rest for young people? Wayne: The balance – Helen: Do you expect to expand that? Wayne: I don’t know exactly what Bill’s contractual agreement is with Youth Haven, but the Youth Haven property in total would allow maximum of 250 beds. Bill’s proposing 96. Youth Haven has 73 today. So, theoretically, there are some additional beds that could be built by Youth Haven. Helen: If – if you – if they change to build them [inaudible] [00:08:30]. Now they say in your papers that it would take – it was gonna be planned to be done over 30 years. Is that a reasonable figure? 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3692 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 7 of 24 Wayne: I’m not sure – Helen: I read the build-out would take over 30 years. Is that reasonable? Wayne: I’m not sure what – Helen: [Inaudible]. I read that in your – your online and your papers. Wayne: I’m not sure what that would have been from. I don’t recall seeing anything – Helen: Which [inaudible]. Wayne: – about 30 year build-out. Sharon: Yeah. We don’t have anything that – that says anything about 30 years [inaudible]. Helen: If you get approval, do you expect to begin now? Wayne: [Inaudible] 96 [inaudible]. [Crosstalk] Helen: I – I mean, how [inaudible]? Wayne: If – if you’re gonna respond, [inaudible]? [Crosstalk] Helen: I just wondered if they had approval, will they begin construction now or will that be until later? Wayne: Well, Youth Haven has been going through a phase approval process since their inception and they built another cottage, I don’t know, not that many years ago – Female Speaker: And it just – it just opened. Helen: Yeah. I know. Wayne: Right. And it just opened. So, I mean, I think their program has – they rely, obviously, on donations and other funding sources. So – Helen: I – I understand. I’ve lived here a long time. I know Youth Haven. 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3693 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 8 of 24 Just – [inaudible] [00:09:41]. Wayne: One thing I would say, as part of the process we’re going through, we’re required to pull this neighborhood informational meeting and get input. We provide a transcript back to the county. Um. We owe a response back to the county. They’ve had some cleanup items that they’ve asked us to provide. So, we’ll submit that to the county. We expect we’ll be ready to go to hearing after that next 30-day review or so. We don’t have hearing dates scheduled, but at this point, we’re in, you know, essentially mid-July at this point. So, probably August-September would be the earliest we could get to a planning commission hearing, which is required. And they make a recommendation, then, to the Board of County Commissioners, which we follow 30 or 45 days after our public hearings. You all have been through the process. You’ll see public hearing signs that get posted on the perimeter of the property. If you received notice for this meeting, you probably will get notice again for the planning commission hearing because we notice everybody within 500 physical feet of the property boundary. And then, we also notify your HOA on the nearest HOA. Pat: What is the cleanup, quote-quote, cleanup that you are required to do? Bill: The cleanup items, a lot of them end up being county attorney comments. We have a couple of transportation comments that our transportation engineer needs to address. There’s nothing really substantive. They we haven’t – Ray: Old citations. Bill: Yeah. There – uh, Mr. Bellows was just indicated that there are some older zoning citations that they’re wanting us to, again, remove from the document. Nothing substantive, I mean, they haven’t questioned anything we’re doing. We’ve been deemed to be consistent with the comprehensive plan with what we’re proposing to do. So, I call them cleanup items because there really isn’t anything that’s substantive to the number of units or the density of the project or anything of that nature. Wayne: Yes, ma’am. Female Speaker 3: Um. They have a 100-bed facility just the street here on Rattlesnake. [Inaudible] [00:11:24]. And they have, uh, almost 100 beds over there. Is there that much need for it? 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3694 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 9 of 24 Wayne: Well, the question is, is there that much need for these additional beds and I think the answer from Bill would be yes. It’s – it’s a large demand. I – I know Rich and I do a lot of these projects and we’re working on a great number of senior housing projects in the area. It seems to be a very large and increasing demand. Female Speaker 3: Is this pay as you go? Or is this through Medicare? Or – Wayne: Anyone wanna take a shot at that? Bill: Um. Our particular business model is 100 percent private pay. Medicare does not pay for, um, memory care services. I’m trying to think of the state of Florida. Um. There – there are some projects that would be – be able to take Medicare, but, um, it’s – specifically, it’s through the Medicaid waiver program in the state of Florida. Um. And that is project by project. Some projects will accept Medicaid waiver residence – Female Speaker 3: Is this a pay as you go? Or – Bill: It is. So, they are under a lease where they pay monthly and if they need to move out, they can move out. They don’t – they just have to give us 30 days’ notice. Female Speaker 3: Right because they’re paying five to six thousand over at Arden Court. Bill: Uh. Unfortunately, that is pretty much the going rate for the – the – Alzheimer’s patients require a very, uh, large amount of hands-on personal care and our particular business model is one that’s a very high touch and even higher level of care, it might cost a little bit more than that, but for certain people’s diagnosis, they respond much better to our type of care and that’s really our main business model because the other memory care projects that we’re familiar with in town do not necessarily offer this level of care. Um. So, we’re hoping that we’ll be able to provide great service to certain residents that aren’t able to find it elsewhere. Pat: So, with dementia, these would be locked units? Bill: Uh. They are not locked, but they have, certainly, access control and wander, um, measures that we take on the doors so that they’re key coded. Um. As you – Pat: So, the patients can’t just wander out. 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3695 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 10 of 24 Bill: Correct. Pat: Yeah. That’s the question. Wayne: And I would just add to what Bill said about the rents and things like that. I mean, those are subject to change, obviously. I don’t think he’s committing that those are his exact rates. I mean, it all comes to the bear when you bring the unit on the market and what the competition is at the time. And in the back? Sue: Yeah. Sue Obermiller. Um. I was just wondering if you were planning on putting anything between Royalwood and the development at that park? Wayne: The existing Youth Haven PUD requires us to retain some native vegetation where it’s feasible. There’s some elevation changes, but our PUD requires that we’re gonna have a minimum of 15 ft. wide type B buffer. And a B buffer is – it can be a combination of a solid wall or it can be a hedge, but it has to be maintained at 80 percent opacity at six ft. high within one year. So, there’ll be trees and a hedge at a minimum in that location separating Royalwood from this project. And of course, Royalwood has some buffering on its own property. Anybody else have questions, comments? Sharon: Um. Helen: Sewage. Pat: Sewage. Wayne: What’s the question about sewage? Helen: Well, how does it affect us in Royalwood? Allen: Well, the sewage – I’m Allen Bednar. Um. Will the sewer part – your system be tied to the sewer that’s serving Royalwood at this time? Wayne: Jeff – this is Jeff Davidson sitting in the back. He’s been doing some engineering work for Royalwood over the years and just permitted their last unit. Jeff, can you address the connection between county water and sewer. Jeff: Right now – I’m Jeff Davidson with Davidson Engineering and I’ve been the, uh, engineer for Youth Haven for approximately 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3696 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 11 of 24 eight years. And, um, right now the wastewater from Youth Haven goes into the Royalwood system, which is a county-owned system. There’s an easement, utilities, and all the sewage goes there to that lift station. I know you might have seen it. On the very north side of the property, there’s a county sanitary lift station – [Crosstalk] Allen: Yes. Right next to the utility yard. Jeff: Right. It all goes there. And then, it pumps out into the county system. Allen: Okay. That’s – because that will be continued to use with your added development. Jeff: I assume so. I’m not good on the engineering, uh, for this space, but I assume they will go the same direction. Wayne: I – just to clarify that. I’m not sure we’ve made that determination yet, Jeff, where, if it’s gonna go out to somewhere else besides into the Royalwood system, but there are easements in place, obviously, for us to connect through there. I don’t think we’ve made that decision yet. Allen: Mmm. Wayne: Any other questions? Yes, sir. Male Speaker 5: What are the age limits for [inaudible] [00:16:34]. Wayne: Well – [Crosstalk] – in Collier County – yeah, there’s a minimum. In Collier County, you have to be 55 and over to be considered under the [inaudible] housing for seniors category that’s out there. It sounds like Bill’s market is primarily people substantially older than age 55. Any questions? Yes, sir. Kyle: Yeah. Kyle [inaudible] [00:16:58] of Royalwood. If the – if the community opted to have a six ft. wall be put up versus a vegetation buffer, um, would that be considered? Second question, um, assuming all of the residential buildings will be one story? 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3697 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 12 of 24 Wayne: Well, the current PUD allows two-story as the maximum building height and we haven’t proposed to change that. I know that Bill’s looking at that right now. So, whether or not they’re going to be one or two-story buildings or a combination thereof – that they won’t be greater than two stories under the existing conditions. Kyle: It’ll be – in the plan shown, are you, um – because I can’t see the building – or that seems the previous [inaudible] um, project. And at that time, they were all being [inaudible] and I think it was a bunch going on on the senior side of it. Those structures were all looked at to be at, uh, one-story facilities. But that’s still up in the air to be determined. Wayne: That is to be determined. Kyle: Okay. And them, on the wall, if we decided we didn’t want the landscape offer, we were at preference to add a wall, to have a wall be put in there, along the Royalwood. And then, to buffer around its interior. Would that be a consideration? Bill: Well, I think the code has certain requirements for separating the two uses and what I described as having either a hedge or a wall with – with the trees meets the county’s minimum requirement for separating the two uses. At present, you all have four-ft. high chain-link fence with some vegetation that you provided to your current buffer to – to Youth Haven. So, I – I – it’s a question we can certainly consider, but I’m not sure we’re willing to make any commitment to a wall, certainly tonight. Kyle: Okay. Wayne: Yes, sir. Looks like you got another question. Allen: `The other thing I noticed with Youth Haven, now – this is Allen Bednar again – is that you have a lot of light pollution. You have, what, security lighting there, I’m assuming, and it really lights up the neighborhood and it’s – it’s kind of coming into – into Royalwood on that side and we’re – is that same kind of lighting going to be in the, um, in the, um, in this Alzheimer’s area too? Wayne: You know, I – I’m not that familiar with the specific lighting plan that Youth Haven has. It’s – the county standards have changed for lighting over time and our newer standards require some cut-off lighting fixtures and – and you can’t put glare on the neighboring properties and things of that nature. Maybe [inaudible] [00:19:28] even addressed that, but Norm’s also a lighting expert and I think 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3698 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 13 of 24 he can tell you that we’ll be required to make sure that our lights village is managed. Pat: What does the county – what are the county – can you comment on that? Ray: For the record, Ray Bellows, I’m the Zoning Manager for the county and most the PUDs where the institutional use is and securities are concerned, lighting is also addressed and we have some, as Mr. Arnold mentioned, cut-off lighting, meaning they’re shielded so they shine away from the adjacent residential areas. That’s typically a commitment contained in the PUD so when subsequent site plans come in that we’re reviewing, they know to make sure the lightings consistent with that. Pat: Thank you. Wayne: Anybody else? Yes, sir. Male Speaker 2: This’ll be county-run. Is that right? Wayne: No, sir. It’ll be privately owned and operated. [Crosstalk] Wayne: Yes. The county – county doesn’t really have anything to do with this project. Male Speaker 2: Well, will there be a – a kind of a guard structure for taking guards? Or security forces? Wayne: I don’t suspect that there is going to be a gated security personnel like you would find at another gated residential community, but they do have security measures that they install for the residents and they also have, obviously, on staff and 27/7 staffing of the facility. Allen: The – the – another issue – Allen Bednar again – uh, is that there was some youth found in Royalwood from time to time who had jumped the fence and – and had come over to our neighborhood. Um. And that is another issue that, uh, I’m sure Royalwood would be concerned about. I know some residents have talked to me about it and found them in our garages and things like that. So, security, I think, is an issue too, even though those boys don’t seem to be, um, that aggressive, but, it was still an issue. 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3699 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 14 of 24 Wayne: Okay. Thank you. Yes, ma’am. Sue: Um. The fence that’s now separating the, uh, Youth – Sue Obermiller – um, the fence that’s separating Youth Haven now for the new part of Youth Haven, is that tall fence gonna be left there separating it or is that coming down? Wayne: Jeff, do you know the answer to that? Jeff: It – it will remain. Wayne: The – the tall fence that runs perpendicular to the – Jeff: No plans to remove that or change that configuration. Yeah. Sue: Okay. Wayne: Okay. Thank you. Anything else? Helen: Has this been approved by the county? Or – Wayne: This project has not been approved yet by the county. We’re going through that process and, uh, if all goes well, we hope to have our approvals by sometime later this Fall. Sue: Sometime when? Wayne: Later this Fall. Helen: One question. What will the height of the buildings be? Wayne: Well, I don’t think we know exactly the – the PUD document as it exists that Youth Haven’s been building under limits them to two stories maximum height. Helen: Two stories. Wayne: Two stories maximum height and we’re not proposing to change that and Bill and his group are looking at whether or not they will do single – single-story or up to two-story buildings. Helen: But not anything more high-rise? Wayne: No. No high-rise type constructions at all. Yes, ma’am. Barbara: Hey. Barbara Oakley. Um. I’m a little confused at this, uh, facility 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3700 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 15 of 24 is to be privately owned and operated. What is this connection to Youth Haven? Is there – is it just gonna be on land that’s owned by Youth Haven? What’s – is there a connection to Youth Haven? I – Wayne: There’s no direct connection to Youth Haven. It’s my understanding that the Youth Haven Foundation owns the property. Youth Haven foundation, um, doesn’t need the entirety of the property based on their current direction for the youth. So, it – it made sense to look at other partnering opportunities and Bill and his group were happy to look at this for senior housing component on the same property. Barbara: Okay. So, this facility’s just being built on land that’s owned Youth Haven? Wayne: Yes. Barbara: That’s the only – only connection? Wayne: And we’re married under the same zoning guidelines. Barbara: Okay. Thank you. Female Speaker 3: So, the land is now being sold. Wayne: The land is going to be sold to Bill’s group if this is successful. Female Speaker 3: Okay. Wayne: Yes, ma’am. Sue: Sue Obermiller. Um. The – the units that are left after the 96 and 70, whatever – the difference between the 250 – the additional units, those are all going to be youth units and are those going on, some of those, going on this property or are they all going on the other property that youths [inaudible] [00:24:12]. Wayne: It is my understanding that the balance of those units will be controlled by Youth Haven and they would go on the principle area that Youth Haven developed. Female Speaker 2: Can you show a map [inaudible]. Maybe you already did, but I’m a little slow with maps. Can you show a map showing the 25 acres? The boundaries of the 25 acres? Wayne: Everything that’s highlighted and says “Youth Haven.” 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3701 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 16 of 24 Female Speaker 2: Most of us can’t see that. Female Speaker: Yeah. Right. Female Speaker 2: If it says “Youth Haven,” we’ll have to believe you because we can’t see. [Crosstalk] Wayne: It’s outlined in red, the area is. Female Speaker 2: That’s – okay. Wayne: And the yellow piece that’s adjacent to – so it’s Youth Haven area that’s outlined in red is about 24 acres. Helen: Oh. There it is. Okay. Wayne: Which you’re adding one acre that’s to the east. Female Speaker 2: So, what are we looking at? Tell us like what’s around it. Wayne: Okay. The area south is Royalwood Blvd. And homes, Royalwood. Immediately east is Santa Barbara Blvd. Whitaker road is the road that we’ll have access to as we currently do. Female Speaker 2: And then – so the dark green right behind the red line. Who owns that? Wayne: That is a vacant residential piece of property. If you drive down Whitaker road there’s a “For Sale” sign on that. So, multi-family housing community that could be developed there. Female Speaker 2: Thank you. Wayne: Anyone else? Female Speaker 1: Could you tell me again how’s – how – how many total beds were there? Wayne: The PUDs we’re proposing to amend it. It currently allows 240 beds. Female Speaker 1: Okay. 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3702 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 17 of 24 Wayne: We’re proposing to amend it to allow 250 beds. Female Speaker 1: Okay. And 96 Alzheimer’s. Wayne: Yes. Bill’s group would build approximately 96 Alzheimer’s senior units. Female Speaker 2: So, Bill’s group would buy how many acres? [Crosstalk] Wayne: It’s approximately nine acres that comprises what – uh. Female Speaker 2: So, that’s where you come up with – what is it? Ten per acre did you say? Wayne: The PUD right now allows ten beds per acre. Female Speaker 2: Per acre. Wayne: Yes. So, about 24 acres times ten units times ten beds per acre, it’s 240 beds that are [inaudible] [00:26:22]. Female Speaker 2: But you’re building – you would be buying nine acres, so then, there only should be nine – 90 beds? Wayne: Well, it’s based on the overall PUD how many there were approved. It was never allocated, uh, for Youth Haven. If you look at their plan – whoops. Female Speaker 2: So, when something is sold, it’s in the same PUD? I’m a little confused how this works. Wayne: Yes. So, the density applies throughout the PUD boundary. Norm, can you highlight on that? The area where Bill is proposing to build. You can see the Youth Haven had plans and allowances to build units throughout that property. The 240 units previously approved were not required to be in any specific configuration or an area of the site. Norm: Like the lake takes up area where no units would be built or that’s hardly overall. Female Speaker 2: So, is there a lake there now or you’re building a lake? Wayne: There is a lake there that Norm highlighted right there. 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3703 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 18 of 24 Pat: That [inaudible] [00:27:11] out. Okay. I’ve never [inaudible]. Wayne: [Inaudible] [00:27:11] there’s a lake. And then, our plan – Norm, can you highlight the lake that we’re proposing to build? That’s adjacent to Santa Barbara Blvd. Pat: That’s a lake. Wayne: Yeah. Pat: And the other – [Crosstalk] Norm: And the existing lake there. Pat: And what’s this other little? Male Speaker 1: That’s – Wayne: In the middle is a vegetative reserve. Female Speaker 2: Vegetation. Okay. Thank you. [Crosstalk] Wayne: Anybody else? Going once, twice. Should we adjourn? Wayne: Let me just say before we do that, um, we provide links on our website, GradyMinor.com, for any of this information. Ray Bellows and his staff have the complete file with Collier County if you want to follow it that way. You can pick up one of Sharon Umpenhour’s business cards from the table and feel free to email her or call her and we’ll provide you with, uh, anything we certainly can to help you answer questions about – Pat: Sharon works with Grady Minor? Wayne: Sharon is a coordinating, she’s will Grady Minor. Sharon: That’s me. Pat: With the recording. She’s with Grad y Minor. Okay. Sharon’s title is? 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3704 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 19 of 24 Wayne: She is a Senior Planning Technician. Pat: Okay. Wayne: And that’s cause she’s over 50. [Crosstalk] Male Speaker 5: Did you record that? Did you record that? [Crosstalk] Pat: So, if this is approved, you’re gonna start doing this when? Wayne: Well, the question is, if this is approved, when do we start? And I think Bill’s answer would be as soon as he can get through the approval process, but we have – if we get through this public hearing process successfully, we’ll have an administrative site plan engineering review process that takes four to six months to get through that process with Collier County. So, it would be sometimes, probably, early to mid-2019 before Bill, at the earliest, could break ground. Pat: Bill, what is your company called? Bill: My company is called Naples Select Senior Development. Pat: And you have other places in town or no? Bill: That particular company does not, but our investment group, um, has developed a number of properties throughout the country. Pat: Well, any in Florida? Bill: Uh. We’ve got a number in – currently in development. Pat: What are some of the ones that are already developed and where are they? Bill: I’m sorry? Pat: What are some of the ones that are already developed and where are they? Bill: There are two in Colorado, one in Georgia. 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3705 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 20 of 24 Pat: And what are their names? Bill: Um. Peeregrine. Pat: Is that Colorado? Bill: That’s Colorado – Colorado. Pat: Can you spell that for me? Bill: P-E-R-E-G-R-I-N-E. Peregrine Landings. Um. And then, the other is called Thrive At Green Island. Pat: One more time. Bill: Thrive At Green Island in Columbus, Georgia. Helen: But not – no – and none so far in Florida. Bill: Correct. [Crosstalk] Pat: And how long have they been there? These companies. These facilities. Bill: Um. The one in Georgia either just recently opened or opened four weeks ago. The two in Colorado have been open for – uh. One has been open for 16 months, the other, 12. Pat: And are you a subsidiary of some other big name up here? Bill: No. Pat: Okay. And now, who – you come under what guidelines? What – um – who follows you as far as, uh, hospitals, a joint commission, like who keeps track on your care and what’s going on with it? Bill: Well, the state more than anyone else. Um. All of our facilities are licensed. Our operators are licensed in their respective states. The state surveys every one of our buildings to make sure the minimum standards are met, the quality of care is – meets minimum standards and those, uh, state surveys and public information. So, all of us operates under those, um, regulatory restraints. Pat: Okay. And what is your title? 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3706 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 21 of 24 Bill: I’m President of Naples Select. Pat: President. Okay. Thank you. Helen: The senior living [inaudible] [00:31:31]. Are those, um, one and two-bedroom apartments? Or – Bill: Uh. Studio and one-bedroom apartments. Helen: Studio. So, that’s – studio is smaller than one-bedroom? Bill: Correct. Helen: Okay. Pat: And how much would be for parking spaces? Bill: Excuse me? Pat: I know – I don’t expect your tenants to be driving, but for parking, for your health, or – what is the parking gonna be over there? Wayne: Ma’am, I don’t know the specific parking standard because some of it will be based on what is mix of how many one-bedroom or studio units he will have. Pat: I assume your patients will not be driving, is that correct? [Crosstalk] Wayne: Yes. That’s correct, but the county has standards that are a little different than maybe – the county codes aren’t quite as current – Bill: [Inaudible] [00:32:19] code has specific for a period of use. Wayne: Yeah. They’re – we’re subject to the Collier County land development code with regard to the parking standards. Pat: And it – and that goes by the beds you have? I’m a little confused. No. Wayne: Yes, ma’am, it does. It varies – Pat: Even though those patients won’t be driving. Okay. 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3707 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 22 of 24 Wayne: Yes. It doesn’t really – the county code doesn’t really have a parking standard for a memory care, for instance. It doesn’t distinguish it from just an age 55 and over and an [inaudible] community. So – [Crosstalk] Pat: So, you’ll have quite a bit of parking there. Okay. Wayne: Um. Hopefully, build as little as we can and the county does have some processes if it looks like it’s gonna be excessive, the county has a deviation process that we can ask for as part of our site plan review. Pat: And so, the drainage over there, everything’s passed, I assume, is that how that works? Drainage for water, or whatever. Wayne: The surface water management system will be permitted through the South Florida management district and it will also be reviewed by Collier County at the time of site plan review when we have detailed engineering drawings. But we’re subject to this very – very strict standards Collier County has for this base and they were part of the Lely area improvement projects. So, the county have various, like, strict requirements for the discharge and things of that nature. Plus, we have our on-site water management lake that we’ll be discharging too. Pat: And you’re required to go up a certain – like a new house would be, you have to go up so high, is that it? Wayne: I’m sure that the land elevation in places will have to be elevat ed just like your community was and just like other new – new parts of Youth Haven, as they develop, will be too. Pat: Okay. Helen: So, there’s one bedroom, um – um. Places – do they have a place to cook? Or – Bill: Uh. No. Our residents are not cooking in their units. Uh. Pat: Right. Hopefully. Bill: They’re not – they’re not permitted to cook in their units and – because they – memory care residents are very different than, say, assisted living or independent living residents. They are further 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3708 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 23 of 24 along the continuum of care and in order to maintain safety for everyone. Helen: So, they would have a dining room? Bill: Yes. There is a common dining room. Exactly. And a common kitchen that all the residents get served from. Wayne: Okay. All good questions. Anything else before we adjourn for the evening? Pat: So, we’ll be notified when there’s more meetings? Or how does this go? Wayne: If you received notice for this meeting tonight, you will receive a notice from Collier County of our nex t meeting, which will be a planning commission here. Your Home-Owners Association probably will also notify you if you get email blast through them. And then, signage will be placed on the site with hearing dates on it indicating the location and time of the hearings. Yes, ma’am. Sue: Sue Obermiller. Will the signage only be on Whitaker Road? Or will it also be, um, along Royalwood Blvd.? Wayne: We probably – there will be none inside your community. No. It has to be on the public road. So, it would be external, probably one on Santa Barbara and at least one on Whitaker Road. Sue: I thought maybe – Wayne: And there’s also gonna be an ad in the Naples daily newspaper. People follow the legal notices. Sue: I thought maybe it would be on that property only where it was visible from [inaudible] [00:35:35]. Wayne: No. No. There’s no requirement for us to put signage outside of [inaudible]. Sue: Okay. Helen: Do you have a name to this development? Wayne: Bill, do you have a working name yet for the project? Bill: I do. We have a working name. The current name is Memory Care 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3709 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 24 of 24 Cottages of Naples. Helen: Never care. Bill: Memory Care – [Crosstalk] – Memory Care Cottages of Naples. Thank you. Wayne: Thank you. Anybody else? If not, we’re gonna adjourn the meeting and let everybody get home. Thank you all for coming out. Thanks for all the good questions. [End of Audio] Duration: 37 minutes 17.E.6 Packet Pg. 3710 Attachment: Attachment F-NIM Synopsis (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) 17.E.8 Packet Pg. 3711 Attachment: Legal Ad - Agenda #7306 (7306 : Youth Haven PUD, PL20180000646) Prepared October 2, 2018 Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) Application and Supporting Documents November 1, 2018 CCPC Hearing Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com May 7, 2018 Ms. Nancy Gundlach, AICP Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, Youth Haven PUD Amendment – PL20180000646, Submittal 1 Dear Ms. Gundlach: A Collier County application for Public Hearing for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for properties located on the south side of Whitaker Road, approximately 260 feet west of Santa Barbara Boulevard, is being filed electronically for review. The Youth Haven PUD (Ordinance 89-12), is a partially developed 24+/- acre institutional project, which permits group housing uses for children. The proposed amendment will add an approximate 1-acre RMF-6 (3) zoned parcel to the PUD, and the PUD will be modified to permit group housing for children and senior adults. A revised master plan is proposed to identify the areas within the PUD, which will identify the areas proposed for youth and senior group housing. The maximum intensity currently permitted is 240 group-housing beds, which is based on a maximum of 10 beds per acre. With the addition of the 1-acre parcel the new PUD acreage will be 25+/- acres; therefore, the PUD will permit up to 250 group-housing beds. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Amendment 3. Property Owner List 4. Applicant/Agent Information 5. Evaluation Criteria 6. Pre-application meeting notes 7. Affidavit of Authorization 8. Property Ownership Disclosure Form Ms. Nancy Gundlach, AICP RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, Youth Haven PUD Amendment – PL20180000646, Submittal 1 May 7, 2018 Page 2 of 2 9. Covenant of Unified Control 10. Addressing Checklist 11. Warranty Deed(s) 12. Boundary Survey 13. Aerial Location Map 14. Environmental Data 15. Traffic Impact Study 16. Waiver of Historic Survey 17. Revised Conceptual Master Plan 18. Ordinance 89-012 19. Proposed PUD Revisions 20. SDP Approval-2007 Plans 21. Wall Variance AVA-2008-AR-13687 Please feel free to contact Rich Yovanovich at 435-3535 or me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: Youth Haven, Inc. Taft Budget, LLC Richard D. Yovanovich GradyMinor File COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 1 of 11 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s)______________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant/Agent: _______________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: __________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. To be completed by staff Please see "Property Owner List" Please see "applicant / agent information" COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 2 of 11 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to the ________________________________ zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________ Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________ Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ___ ____ Total Sq. Ft. or Acres: __________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use Other: ________________ Youth Haven PUD 89-012 Youth Haven PUD and RMF-6(3) Youth Group Care Facility and undeveloped RMF-6(3) Group Care Facility, youth and senior adults Youth Haven 17 50 26 Please see Boundary Survey Please see Property Owner List 1,666±636±1,103,949 25+/- South side of Whitaker Rd. approx., 3/4 mile east of County Barn Road. 5867 Whitaker Road. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 3 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ WOODMERE LAKE CLUB, C/O Collier Financial, Inc., 4985 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34113 RMF-6 and RMF-6(3)Whitaker Road ROW, Undeveloped Royal Woods G&C Club PUD Residential and Golf Course RMF-6(3) Undeveloped and Santa Barbara Boulevard ROW RMF-6 Undeveloped Royal Wood Master Association, Inc. 4300 Royal Wood Boulevard Naples FL 34112 Amberly Village Association, Inc. 9150 Galleria Court, Suite 201 Naples FL 34109 Cranbrook Colony, Inc. 9150 Galleria Court, Suite 201 Naples FL 34109 Edgewood Condominium Assoc., of Naples, Inc. PO Box 110339 Naples FL 34108 Naples Parkwood Club, Inc. 6017 Pine Ridge Road #262 Naples FL 34119 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 4 of 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 5 of 11 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will not receive further processing and an application “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”. Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. N/A COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ Taft Budget LLC Naples FL 34112 239-947-1144 warnold@gradyminor.com 5867 Whitaker Road 34112 17 50 26 Please see Boundary Survey Please see Property Owner List 10 group-housing beds 2,173.5 GPD 1,610 GPD 1,552.5 GPD 1,150 GPD 2020 4 4 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. Not applicable Existing project. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 8 of 11 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for ______________ planned unit development (______________PUD) zoning. We hereby designate___________________, legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Owner Owner ____________________________________ ___________________________________ Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this day of , 201__ by ____________________ who is personally known to me or has produced _____________________________ as identification. ____________________________________ Notary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 9 of 11 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at INSERT LINK. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre-application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Checklist continues on next page 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 10 of 11 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if Amending the PUD Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 4 4 4 4 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 11 of 11 Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re-submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. ___________________________________ _____________ Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date ___________________________________ Printed named of signing party D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) Property Owner List March 21, 2018 Page 1 of 1 YHPUDA Property Owner List.docx Parcel Number Owner 00427160002 Youth Haven Inc., 5867 Whitaker Road, Naples, FL 34112 00428200505 Youth Haven Foundation Inc., 5867 Whitaker Road, Naples, FL 34112 00428200602 Youth Haven Foundation Inc., 5867 Whitaker Road, Naples, FL 34112 00427080001 Norma R. Farmilo Trust, Whitaker Road, Naples, FL 34112 Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) Applicant / Agent Information March 24, 2018 Page 1 of 1 YHPUDA Applicant Agent Information.docx Applicant: Name of Applicant: Wendell W. Corey Firm: Taft Budget LLC Address: 825 S. Taft City: Mason City State: Iowa Zip: 50401 Telephone: 641-424-3330 E-Mail Address: Corey.projects@gmail.com Agent: Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Firm: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey City: Bonita Springs State: FL Zip: 34134 Telephone: 239-947-1144 E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com and Name of Agent: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Firm: Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Address: 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34103 Telephone: 239-947-1144 E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) Evaluation Criteria June 13, 2018 Page 1 of 7 YHPUDA Evaluation Criteria-rev1.docx Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. Narrative The Youth Haven PUD (Ordinance 89-12), is a partially developed 24+/- acre institutional project, which permits group housing uses for children. The proposed amendment will add an approximate 1-acre RMF-6 (3) zoned parcel to the PUD, and the PUD will be modified to permit group housing for children and senior adults. A revised master plan is proposed to identify the areas with the PUD, which will identify the areas proposed for youth and senior group housing. The maximum intensity currently permitted is 240 group-housing beds, which is based on a maximum of 10 beds per acre. With the addition of the 1-acre parcel the new PUD acreage will be 25+/- acres; therefore, the PUD will permit up to 250 group-housing beds. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The area is suitable for group housing for senior adults and children. The site has water, sewer and a surface water management system in place. The proposed access will remain on Whitaker Road as originally anticipated for the Youth Haven PUD. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The property is under unified control. The PUD is proposed to be modified to include language approved by the County Attorney’s Office, requiring a single entity to provide the required annual monitoring reports. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) Evaluation Criteria June 13, 2018 Page 2 of 7 YHPUDA Evaluation Criteria-rev1.docx The existing and permitted group housing use has been previously deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The addition of senior adult group housing has no impact on consistency with the Growth Management Plan. The property is designated Urban-Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Sub-district on the Future Land Use Map. Policy 5.10 of the Future Land Use Element provides for group care facilities and assisted living facilities as permitted uses in urban designated areas. The proposed addition of the group housing for seniors use is consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The Youth Haven PUD and the group care uses (existing and proposed) remain compatible and complimentary with surrounding land uses consistent with Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element. The surrounding land uses remain single family residential and multi -family residential, consistent with the initial PUD approval. The PUD document contains development standards and buffers which have been previously deemed compatible with the surrounding area. Objective 7 and the implementing policies promote smart growth. Specifically Policy 7.3 encourages interconnections with adjoining neighborhoods. The Youth Haven PUD has been developed as a group housing campus without interconnections. Providing interconnections to the Royal Wood Golf and Country Club PUD located to the south is not feasible due to the built out condition of that PUD. Interconnection to the undeveloped multi -family tract to the east of Youth Haven would provide no meaningful or useful interconnection as both parcels would access Whitaker Road, which is a local road. Further, interconnections would disrupt the campus atmosphere of Youth Haven. The Youth Haven PUD doe s provide a walkable campus environment consistent with Policy 7.4 of the Future Land Use Element. The applicant’s professional certified planning team are of the opinion that as proposed the PUD is consistent with the Growth Management Plan as required b y Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element. The Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan was recently amended to add Policy 12.1.14, which provides for shelter requirements for assisted living facilities and nursing homes. Revisions to Section 5.05.04 of the LDC were subsequently adopted with more detailed regulatory standards for group housing uses. A new development commitment has been added to Section 4.11 of the PUD, which references compliance with Section 5.05.04 of the LDC. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) Evaluation Criteria June 13, 2018 Page 3 of 7 YHPUDA Evaluation Criteria-rev1.docx The proposed inclusion of senior group housing will have no bearing on compatibility of the project to surrounding projects. The newly constructed area for senior housing will provide buffering required per the Land Development Code between group housing and the adjacent properties. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The PUD will provide a minimum of 30% of the project area as open space consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The site will contain an on-site native vegetation preservation area, water management lakes, and other areas used for outdoor recreation areas. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Available infrastructure is in place to serve the entire proposed PUD. There are no existing or anticipated capacity issues near the project. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. With the addition of the 1 acre parcel located east of the current PUD boundary, there is not an opportunity to expand the PUD boundary in the future. Although the parcel located immediately to the west of the PUD is vacant, it is zoned RMF -6 and is anticipated to develop with residential development in the future. Although it may be possible to expand in the future, if the property were acquired. At present, the applicant has no desire to do so. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulatio ns in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The PUD as proposed is consistent with the Land Development Code. Minor deviations have been requested, which will permit development consistent with the proposed conceptual master plan. LDC Section 10.02.08 F - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) Evaluation Criteria June 13, 2018 Page 4 of 7 YHPUDA Evaluation Criteria-rev1.docx has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The existing PUD allows for group housing uses and has been previously deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The Future Land Use of the Plan permits group-housing uses throughout the urban designated areas of the County. The group housing use has previously been determined to be compatible with the surrounding property, and remains consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 5.4, requiring a finding of consistency with the Growth Management Plan for any rezoning. Since development of the site, the County has acquired right-of-way to the east of the property in which the 6 -laning of Santa Barbara Boulevard has occurred, and the County has completed it s stormwater management improvements for the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project (LASIP). The project as proposed remains compatible with the surrounding area, consistent with Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element, requiring a finding of compatibility. Policy 7.1 of the Future Land Use Element encourages developments to be interconnected where feasible. The existing PUD was not designed or intended to be interconnected with adjacent projects due to the nature of the proposed uses. No interconnection is proposed as part of the PUD as it wo uld not be consistent with the development that has occurred on site, nor would there be a transportation benefit with the provision of an interconnection. The project will provide on-site native vegetation based on 15% of the existing native vegetation as required by Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. The native vegetation preserve has been identi fied on Exhibit “A”, Conceptual Master Plan and Exhibit “B”, Conceptual Master Plan Notes. The project as proposed is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. The pattern of development near the project has been established, and the PUD is surrounded by conventional multi-family zoned parcels or PUD’s which permit a variety of residential uses. The pattern of development remains unchanged, and this area continues to be suitable for the existing group housing use. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) Evaluation Criteria June 13, 2018 Page 5 of 7 YHPUDA Evaluation Criteria-rev1.docx The proposed inclusion of 1 additional acre of land and the addition of senior group housing in addition to group housing for children will not create an isolated district. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The zoning district boundaries are logically drawn and encompass all property owned by the existing and contract purchaser. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The proposed inclusion of the reference to senior adult group housing was advised by staff as necessary, due to the reference in the PUD to youth/child group housing, without reference to senior adult group housing. The proposed amendment adds the reference to senior adult, and youth/child group housing. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed amendment to add 1 acre of property and an additional 10 senior adult or youth beds will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The increase of 10 senior adult/youth beds will not excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible. A traffic analysis has been prepared in sup port of the amendment and concludes that there are no capacity issues associated with the proposed amendment. Group housing has been deemed to be a compatible use near conventional residential development, as is the traffic associated with the use. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The PUD’s surface water management system has been previously approved and is in place. With the addition of property, the project will again be reviewed by the South Florida Water Management District to insure that there are no drainage issues associated with the project. No existing drainage issues have been identified. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) Evaluation Criteria June 13, 2018 Page 6 of 7 YHPUDA Evaluation Criteria-rev1.docx 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed changes will have no impact on light or air to adjacent properties. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The applicant has no evidence that the proposed PUDR application and subsequent limited increase in density, by 10 senior/youth beds, will impact property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed changes will not be a deterrent to improvement or development of adjacent property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. Approving an amendment to an existing PUD will not grant a special privilege to an individual owner. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The existing zoning for both the RMF-6 and PUD currently allow group-housing uses. In order to utilize the property for a unified plan of development, the PUD amendment is necessary. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neigh borhood or the county. The proposed change to add property and slightly increase the number of senior adult/youth beds is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or County. The County has identified in their Growth Management Plan that group-housing uses are permitted throughout the urban designated area. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) Evaluation Criteria June 13, 2018 Page 7 of 7 YHPUDA Evaluation Criteria-rev1.docx It is not impossible to find other sites in Collier County for the use. However, the existing PUD has infrastructure in place to serve group-housing uses, and will avoid unnecessary sprawl by utilizing an existing site. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Portions of the site will need to be cleared and filled in order to develop additional group housing buildings whether the PUD amendment is approved or not. This is consistent with almost all other development that occurs in Collier County. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. The proposed amendments have no impact on the availability of adequate public facilities or adopted levels of service. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public hea lth, safety, and welfare. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Plan and is compatible with surrounding development. Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Drive N. Naples, FL 34104 239-252-2400 RECEIPT OF PAYMENT Receipt Number:2018480348 Transaction Number:2018-019096 Date Paid:03/07/2018 Amount Due:$500.00 Payment Details:Payment Method Amount Paid Check Number Credit Card $500.00 11649741-C1032 4169 Amount Paid:$500.00 Change / Overage:$0.00 Contact:Chuck A. Pigeon, P.E. 925 SE 17th Street Ocala, FL 34471 FEE DETAILS: Fee Description Reference Number Original Fee Amount Paid GL Account Pre-application Meeting PL20180000646 $500.00 $500.00 131-138326-341276 Cashier Name:RichardKoenigsknecht Batch Number:7138 Entered By: camdensmith Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20180000646 PRE-APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Camden Smith, Jessica Velasco • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Chuck Pigeon (352) 861-7799 • Agent to list for PL# Wayne Arnold, Q. Grady Minor & Associates warnold@gradyminor.com • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) ➢ Please see attached exhibit • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Amendment to Youth Haven PUD to add 1 acre, revise to include adults in addition to youth residency, and revise PUD master plan. • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): The PUD permits 10 youth residents per acre and the amendment will continue to use the density of 10 youth/adults per acres. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name Wayne Arnold Title Director of Planning Email warnold@gradyminor.com Phone (239) 947-1144 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION 1 VelascoJessica Subject:Pre-App PL20180000646 Youth Haven PUD Amendment (PUDA) Location:Conference Room C Start:Wed 3/7/2018 1:30 PM End:Wed 3/7/2018 2:30 PM Show Time As:Tentative Recurrence:(none) Meeting Status:Accepted Organizer:CDS-C Required Attendees:AcevedoMargarita; AlcornChris; Amy Lockhart-Taylor; AnthonyDavid; ArnoldMichelle; AshtonHeidi; AuclairClaudine; BaluchStephen; BeardLaurie; BrownAraqueSummer; BrownCraig; CascioGeorge; CondominaDanny; CrotteauKathynell; CrowleyMichaelle; David Ogilvie; DeselemKay; dfey@northcollierfire.com; DumaisMike; FaulknerSue; FeyEric; FinnTimothy; FleishmanPaula; GewirtzStorm; GiblinCormac; GosselinLiz; GundlachNancy; HouldsworthJohn; HughesJodi; HumphriesAlicia; JacobLisa; JohnsonEric; JosephitisErin; KellyJohn; KendallMarcia; KurtzGerald; LevyMichael; lmartin@sfwmd.gov; MartinezOscar; MastrobertoThomas; McCaughtryMary; McKennaJack; McKuenElly; McLeanMatthew; MoscaMichele; MoxamAnnis; NawrockiStefanie; OrthRichard; PajerCraig; PattersonAmy; PepinEmily; pjimenez@sfwmd.gov; PochmaraNatalie; ReischlFred; RodriguezWanda; RomanDaniel; RosenblumBrett; SaboJames; SantabarbaraGino; SawyerMichael; ScottChris; ScottTami; ShawinskyPeter; Shawn Hanson; SheaBarbara; SmithCamden; SmithDaniel; StoneScott; StrainMark; SuleckiAlexandra; SummersEllen; SweetChad; TempletonMark; Todd Riggall; VanLengenKris; VargaCecilia; VelascoJessica; WalshJonathan; WeeksDavid; WickhamFlannery; WilloughbyChristine; Chuck Pigeon Categories:Nancy's Petition Planner: Nancy Gundlach Fire District: Greater Naples Fire ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ $ 425,000 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,500 $ 500 $ 0 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No.00427080001 Site Adr. Name / Address NORMA R FARMILO TRUST 4036 KENT CT City NAPLES State FL Zip 34116-7310 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B17 000100 024 5B17 17 50 26 0.98 Legal 17 50 26 E1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS N 30FT R/W 4.77 AC; LESSTHAT PORTION DESC IN ORDER OF TAKING FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 4342 PG3998 Millage Area 261 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 05/02/05 3787-2954 02/18/04 3503-1333 12/28/98 2495-258 02/13/95 2029-2061 05/01/80 868-1273 12/01/69 336-890 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No.00427080001 Site Adr. Name / Address NORMA R FARMILO TRUST 4036 KENT CT City NAPLES State FL Zip 34116-7310 Permits TaxYr Issuer Permit #CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type Land #Calc Code Units 10 FLAT VALUE 0.98 Building/Extra Features #YearBuilt Description Area AdjArea Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No.00427080001 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. $ 0 $ 782,600 $ 1,433,514 $ 2,216,114 $ 2,216,114 $ 0 $ 0 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No.00427160002 Site Adr.5867 WHITAKER RD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Name / Address YOUTH HAVEN INC 5867 WHITAKER RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34112-2963 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B17 000100 026 5B17 17 50 26 15.65 Legal 17 50 26 SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4, W1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, W1/2OF E1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS R/W 16.71 AC OR 404 PG 517 + OR1162 PG 1275 Millage Area 261 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 75 - ORPHANAGES, OTHER NON-PROFIT 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 10/01/85 1162-1275 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No.00427160002 Site Adr.5867 WHITAKER RD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Name / Address YOUTH HAVEN INC 5867 WHITAKER RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34112-2963 Permits TaxYr Issuer Permit #CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1972 COUNTY 71-1044 06/14/72 1974 COUNTY 73-2258 07/31/74 1978 COUNTY 77-3697 05/11/78 1991 COUNTY 91-3880 1993 COUNTY 92-9760 11/16/92 1995 COUNTY 94-7240 07/27/94 1999 COUNTY 9811-0386 NO PICKUP 2003 COUNTY 2002100904 12/26/02 NO PICKUP 2004 COUNTY 2003011081 01/15/03 NO PICKUP 2013 COUNTY 2010090421 NO PICKUP 2014 COUNTY PRBD20130307291 11/01/13 ROOF, NO PICKUP 2014 COUNTY PRBD20130307297 11/01/13 ROOF, NO PICKUP 2014 COUNTY PRBD20130307305 11/25/13 NO PICKUP 2015 COUNTY PRBD20130718607 OTHER 2015 COUNTY PRBD20131026944 12/16/14 NO PICKUP Land #Calc Code Units 10 ACREAGE 15.65 20 FLAT VALUE 1.06 Building/Extra Features #YearBuilt Description Area AdjArea 10 1972 RESIDENTIAL 7204 8167 20 1974 GARAGE 912 912 30 1978 RESIDENTIAL 1860 2009 40 1984 RESIDENTIAL 4132 4321 50 1990 RESIDENTIAL 3223 3369 60 1990 RESIDENTIAL 3223 3369 70 2013 CLF4 250 250 80 2013 CLF8 1560 1560 90 2014 CHICKEE HUT 576 576 3/6/2018 Collier County Property Appraiser http://www.collierappraiser.com/1/1 Collier County Property Appraiser Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No.00427160002 Site Adr.5867 WHITAKER RD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. $ 0 $ 178,875 $ 0 $ 178,875 $ 178,875 $ 0 $ 0 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No.00428200505 Site Adr. Name / Address YOUTH HAVEN FOUNDATION INC 5867 WHITAKER RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34112-2963 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B17 000100 059 5B17 17 50 26 4.77 Legal 17 50 26 W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS THE N 30 FT THEREOF Millage Area 261 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 70 - VACANT INSTITUTIONAL 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 04/29/08 4354-1411 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No.00428200505 Site Adr. Name / Address YOUTH HAVEN FOUNDATION INC 5867 WHITAKER RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34112-2963 Permits TaxYr Issuer Permit #CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type Land #Calc Code Units 10 ACREAGE 4.77 Building/Extra Features #YearBuilt Description Area AdjArea Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No.00428200505 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. $ 0 $ 89,625 $ 0 $ 89,625 $ 89,625 $ 0 $ 0 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No.00428200602 Site Adr. Name / Address YOUTH HAVEN FOUNDATION INC 5867 WHITAKER RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34112-2963 Map No.Strap No.Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B17 000100 060 5B17 17 50 26 2.39 Legal 17 50 26 E1/2 OF E1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/2 OF NE1/4, LESS THE N 30FT THEREOF Millage Area 261 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 70 - VACANT INSTITUTIONAL 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 04/29/08 4354-1413 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after theFinal Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No.00428200602 Site Adr. Name / Address YOUTH HAVEN FOUNDATION INC 5867 WHITAKER RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34112-2963 Permits TaxYr Issuer Permit #CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type Land #Calc Code Units 10 ACREAGE 2.39 Building/Extra Features #YearBuilt Description Area AdjArea Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No.00428200602 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. SUBDIVISON INDEX ATTEST___________________________CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TWP 50S RNG 26E SEC(S) 17 NO 1/2 MAP NUMBER: BY___________________________CHAIRMAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION LEANORE CT. 367 436 337 347 374 PICARDY295 2 1 2 1 412PUD 304CHAMPAGNE C T .298 305306307 303 2 408 409 410 41 CHAMONIXCT 407 301CT292 293294 299 300 GC 302 289 290 291 2 TRACT D 418 416 417 411 413 414415 419 371372373 1 4 368369370 420 421 422 322 1 3 3 328 RIVIERA GOLF CHARLEMAGNE378379380381 375376377 326 327 354 355 356 363 360 PUD PARISCT.364 MARSEILLE DRIVE 350 361 351352353 357 358 359 348349 362 325323324 329 330 334331332333 335 336 17 8A RMF-6 RMF-6 432 433 3 434435 V 4 428 429 430 431 365 425 426 427 366 423 424 3 4 6 6 GOLF & COUNTRY C D VILLAGE B CLUB UNIT TWO ROYAL WOOD ,9,12,13PUD1 G TRACT N D E F COLONY C BCOUNTY BARN ROAD343 BOULEVARD 344 345 340 341 342346 338 339 3 PARKWOODCLUB CONDO NAPLES 5 WOODMERELAKE CLUBCONDO EDGEWOODCONDO RMF-6 W O O D YOUTH HAVEN E AMBERLY A F R O YA L CRANBROOK H I B LVD .1 2 BROOKJ CRANA 3 4 5 WAY6 7 WHITAKER ROAD PUD 7PU 2 ,4,5 20 5 17 18 19 14 15 16 11 12 13 8 9 10 5 (3)1 17 V 11 WENDY LANE G G BEAUVILLE LAKECLUB CONDO A B C D E F G H I J LANSDALE LANE CYNTHIA WAY ERIN WOODSCLUB CONDO AB C D E F G A B C AB C D A B C D E FG H I J RIVIERA GOLF ESTATES ESTATES TRACT NTRACT N TRACT N TRACT N TRACT N 5 6 6 5 6 5 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD14 14 MONTAUBONCT MARSEILLEDRIVE$NO. NAME P.B. Pg. 1 RIVIERA COLONY GOLF ESTATES TRACT MAP 10 104-1082 RIVIERA GOLF ESTATES UNIT 1 PHASE 2 12 108-1093 RIVIERA GOLF ESTATES UNIT 1 PHASE 3 12 110-1114 RIVIERA GOLF ESTATES UNIT 2 13 108-1115 ROYAL WOOD GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB UNIT 3 15 95-566 ROYAL WOOD GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB UNIT 2 15 15-2078910 0617N 0617S0618N 0616N0608S ZONING NOTES1 9-15-87 R-87-7C 87-712 9-1-81 R-81-14C 81-433 9-26-89 V-89-9 89-2634 PDA-88-10C5 2-28-89 R-88-19C 89-126 12-20-88 R-88-17 88-1027 7-31-90 PU-90-10 90-4008 LDC-919 1-12-93 PUD-87-7(1) 93-410 REDRAWN 7-13-9311 8-24-93 V-93-13 93-36012 11-26-93 PUD-87-7(2) 96-7213 5-13-14 PDI-PL-13-644 HEX-14-1114 10-24-78 R-78-20 78-58NO. NAME P.B. Pg. 11121314151617181920 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MODIFICATIONS16-22-92 R-92-4 92-43THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THEOFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS REFERRED TO AND ADOPTEDBY REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO. 04-41 OF THECOUNTY OF COLLIER, FLORIDA, ADOPTED JUNE 22, 2004,AS AMENDED BY THE ZONING NOTES AND SUBDIVISIONINDEX REFERENCED HEREON. 0 400 SCALE 9-22-17 Col lie r Zoning Map Sou rce s: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, I nte rmap , increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,FAO , NP S, NRCAN, Ge oB ase, IGN, Ka da ster NL, Or dnance Survey, Esr iJapan, METI , Esri Chin a (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, ©OpenSt re et Ma p co ntributo rs, and the GIS User Community Address Points GMD.DBO .Z oningLinks PAO Township Range Section Zoning_Overlay Zoning_General Zoning_Exception PAO Parcels Occupancy Category 2 2004 Wellfields Planned Unit Developm ent City Lim its Commissoner Dis trict Ju ne 3 0, 2017 Co un ty of Collier, E sri, HE RE , Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS, EPA, USDA | Co llie r GIS 0 0.0 7 0.1 40.0 35 mi 0 0.0 85 0.1 70.0 4 25 km 1:4,514 Current PUD: Zoning General: PUD ZONE NOTE: 9/1/81 R-81-14-C, PDA-88-10C, R-88-19C; 6-6-03 SUNSETTED; ORD. 89-12 PAO Township Range Section: 50 TOWNSHIP 50 SECTION_ 17 RANGE 26 T_R_S 502617 Address Points: 5867 Whitaker RD Full Address 5867 Whitaker RD, Naples Stub Address 5867 Whitaker RD Planned Unit Development: YOUTH HAVEN STATUS ACTIVE PETITION R-88-19 SYS_PUD_NU ORD_NUM 89-12 Commissioner District: Donna Fiala DISTRICT 1 Additional Property Being Added: Zoning General: RMF-6(3) ZONING RMF-6(3) PAO Parcels: 427080001 PAO Township Range Section: 50 TOWNSHIP 50 SECTION_ 17 RANGE 26 T_R_S 502617 ORDINANCE 89 12 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 822 THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 50264BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM RMF6 AND PUD TO PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OWN AS YOUTH HAVEN FOR GROUP CARE FACILITIES AND RELATEDUSESjINCLUDINGHOUSINGHEALTHCAREFACILITIESANDRECREATIONALUSESFORPROPERTYLOCATEDONTHESOUTHSIDEOFWHITAKERROADAPPROXIMATELY34MILEEASTOFCOUNTYBARNROADINSECTION17TOWNSHIP50SOUTHRANGE26EASTCONTAINING24ACRESMOREORLESSANDBYPROVIDINGANEFFECTIVEDATEWHEREASWilsonMillerBartonSollPeekIncrepresentingYouthHavenIncpetitionedtheBoardofCountyCommissionerstochangethezoningclassificationofthehereindescribedrealpropertyNOWTHEREFOREBEITORDAINEDbytheBardofCountyCommissionersofCollierCountyFloridaTheZoningClassificationofthehereindescribedpropertylocatedinSection17Township50SouthRangeEastCollierCountyFloridaischangedfromPZF6andPUDtoPUDPlannedUnitDevelopmentinaccordancewiththePUDdocumentattachedheretoasExhibitAwhichisincorporatedhereinandbyreferencemadeparthereofTheOfficialZoningAtlasMapNumber50264asdescribedinOrdinance822isherebyamendedaccordinglyThisOrdinanceshallbecomeeffectiveuponreceiptofnoticefromtheSecretaryofStatethatthisOrdinancehasbeenfiledwiththeSecretaryofStateATTESTJAMESOdIrESCLERKBOARDOFCOUNTYCOMMISSIONERSCOLLIERCOUNTYFLORIDABURTLSAUNDERSCHAIRMANR8819CZONINGORDINANCEAJENDMENTSoo17 WRiOqqMIURqTOfOtLIEICINCPLARNEDUNITDEVELOPHENTDOCUHENTFORYOUTIHAVEN240AcresLocatedinSection17Tovnship50SouthRange26EastCollierCountyFloridaPREPAREDFORYOUTHHAVENINCPOSTOFFICEBOX7007NAPLESFLORIDA33941PREPAREDBYALANDREYNOLDSAICPWILSONHILLERBARTONSOLLPEEKINCENGINEERSPLANNERSLANDSURVEYORS1383AirportRoadNorthNaplesFlorida33942ANDYOUNGVANASSENDERPVARNADOEBENTONPASunBankBuildingSuite800801LaurelOakDriveNaplesFlorida33963DATEFILEDJulys1988DATEREVISEDJanuary13i1989DATiiiJnua989DATEAPPROVEDBYBCCFebruaryRlqORDINANCENUMBER8gI MILLEI4RTONSOLLPEKINCTABLEOFCONTENTSSECTIONISECTIONIISECTIONIIISECTIONIVTableofContentsListofExhibitsStatementofComplianceandShortTitlePropertyDescriptionandOwnershipProjectDevelopmentGroupCareFacilitiesGeneralDevelopmentCommitmentsPAGEiiiii11213141 W1TONMILLERBARTONSOLLPEEKINCEXHIBITALISTOFEXHIBITSPlannedUnitDevelopmentMasterPlanAerialPhotographLocationMapPreparedbyWilsonMillerBartonSoilPeekIncFileNoii STATEMENT OF COHFIANCE Youth Haven was founded in 1969 to provide 24hour residential care to children in need through no fault of their own In 1981 the zoning to PUD was approved for the 143 acres owned by Youth Haven to provide for residential cottages Since 1981 Youth Haven has acquired an additional 97 acres and needs to expand the residential cottage use to the new lands Youth Haven Inc is a wellestablished independent nonprofit organization providing care to children in crisis The existing and planned facilities are low density well maintained and are very compatible with the surrounding neighborhood The proposed changes to the PUD will provide for the future orderly development of the Youth Haven facility Section IIAof the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Urban Area provides for nonresidential land uses including community facilities Listed examples of community facilities include rest homes While the proposed use group care facilities does not fit the definition of rest home provided in the Zoning Ordinance it is similar in character Both uses involve providing 24 hour care for persons unable to care for themselves Therefore the requested use is in compliance with the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Youth Maven will also be consistent with the growth policies land development regulations and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for the following reasons 1 The subject property has the necessary rating points to determine the availability of adequate community facilities and services 2 3 4 The project development is compatible and complimentary to the surrounding land uses Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable regulations The project development will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services 5 The project development is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities The Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan GMP contains language similar to that in the 1983 Comprehensive Plan Therefore the subject request is in compliance with the GMP SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the YOUTH HAVEN Planned Unit Development Ordinance iii mWItONMILLERARTONKLLPEEICINCSECTIONPROPERTYOWNERSHIPGENERALDESCRIPTION1011PROPERTYOWNERSHIPThesubjectpropertyiscurrentlyownedbyYouthHavenIncPostOfficeBox7007NaplesFlorida33941LEGALDESCRIPTIONORIGINALPARCELTheSE14oftheN14oftheNE14andtheW12oftheSW14oftheNE14oftheNE14ofSection17Township50SouthRange26EastlesstheNorth30feetthereofforWhittakerRoadrightofwayCollierCountyFloridacontaining1432acresNEWPARCELSTheW12oftheg12oftheSW14oftheNE14oftheNE14Section17Township50SouthRange26EastlesstheNorth30feetthereofforWhittakerRoadrightofwayCollierCountyFloridaandTheW12oftheSE14oftheNE14oftheNE14Section17Township50SouthRange26EastlesstheNorth30feetthereofforWhittakerRoadrightofwayCollierCountyFloridaThenewparcelscontainapproximately97acres11 MIILEBXTONSOLPEEKINCSECTIONI1PROJECTDEVELOPHENT201PURPOSE202ThepurposeofthisSectionistogenerallydescribetheplanofthedevelopmentanddelineatethegeneralconditionsthatwillapplytotheprojectGENERALPLANOFDEVELOPHENTYouthHavenisaplannedcommunityincludingamixtureofgroupcarerelidentialrecreationalconservationandwatermanagementrelatedfacilities203LANDUSES204205ExhibitAthePlannedUnitDevelopmentMasterPlancontainsasummaryoftheintendedlandusetypeswithapproximateacreagesandakeytothevariouztypesoffacilitiesThearrangementoftheselanduseandfacilitytypesisshownonExhibitAChangesandvariationsindesignandacreagesshallbepermittedatfinaldesigntoaccomodatetopographyvegetationandothersiteconditionsThespecificlocationsizeandassignmentoffacilitiestheretoshallbedeterminedatthetimeofdetailedsitedevelopmentplanningPROJECTDENSITYThetotalacreageoftheYouthHavenPlannedUnitDevelopmentisapproximately240acresSincefamiliesintheconventionalsensedonotresideintheYouthHavenprojectpopulationdensityshallbelimitedtotenchildrenperacreplusstaffadultsasnecessaryorrequiredbylawDEVELOPMENTSEQUENCEANDSCHEDULETheapplicanthasnotsetstagesforthedevelopmentofthepropertyThepropertyistobedevelopedoveranestimated30yeartimeperiod21 WgONMIIIRSARTONOLLEKIN206EASEMENTSFORUTILITIES207EasementsshallbeprovidedforwatermanagementareasutilitiesandotherpurposesasmaybeneededSaldeasementsandimprovementsshallbeincompliancewiththeCollierCountySubdivisionRegulationsineffectatthetimeapermitisrequestedorrequiredAilnecessaryeasementsdedicationsorotherinstrumentsshallbegrantedtoinsurethecontinuedoperationandmaintenanceofallserviceutilitiesinsubstantialcompliancewithapplicableregulationsineffectatthetimeapprovalsarerequestedEXCEPTIONSTOTHECOLLIERCOUNTYSUBDIVISIONREGULATIONSThefollowingrequirementsoftheSubdivisionRegulationsshallbemodifiedsubjecttoreviewandapprovalbytheCountyEngineeratthetimeofconstructionplansubmittal1ArticleXISection1AccessTheCountyEngineermayapproverelocationofproposedaccesspointsasshownonthePUDMasterPlan2345ArticleXISection10MonumentsWheresuchmonumentsoccurwithinstreetpavementareastheyshallnotbeinstalledinatypicalwatervalvecoverasprescribedinthecurrentCountystandardssubjecttoinstallationofallmonumentsinaccordancewithStateStatutesandasapprovedbytheCountyEngineerArticleXISection17GStreetPavementWidthsReducerequirementsforlocalroadsfromtwo2twelvefootlanestotwo2tenfootlanessubjecttotheapprovaloftheCountyEngineerforprivateculdesacstreetsonlyArticleXZSection17ICurbRadiiReducerequirementsfromforty40footradiustothirty30footradiusatlocaltolocalroadandlocaltominorcollectorroadintersectionsonlyArticleXISection17JIntersectionsRequiringcurvedstreetstohaveaminimumtangentof100feetatintersections6ArticleXISection21UtilityCasingsProvidedallutilitiesareinstalledpriortostreetconstruction22 208 LAKE SITING As depicted on the PUD Master Plan Exhibit A lakes and natural retention areas have been sited adjacent to existing and planned roadways The goal is to achieve an overall aesthetic haracter for the project to permit optimum use of the land and to increase the efficiency of the water management network Accordingly the setback requirements described in Ordinance 8026 Section SA may be reduced with the approval of the County Engineer Fill material from lakes is planned to be utilized within the project however excess fill material may be utilized offsite subject to the provisions of the excavation ordinance in effect at the time permits are sought Final lake area determination shall be in accordance with the South Florida Water Management District stormwater criteria 209 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES 210 Roads and other infrastructure may be either public or private depending on location capacity and design Developer shall be responsible for maintaining the roads streets drainage water and sewer improvements where such systems are not dedicated to the County SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL Prior to the issuance of building permits a site development plan SDP must be submitted for review and approval in accordance with Section 105 of Zoning Ordinance 822 211 FROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS Exhibit A Youth Haven PUD Master Plan constitutes the FUD Master Plan and the Subdivision Master Plan provided that supplemental information required by the Subdivision Regulations not indicated on the PUD Master Plan shall be submitted to Project Review Services for administrative reiew and approval prior to the submission of detailed construction plans for building permits 23 MILLERBAIlONOLLPEEKINCSECTIONIIIGROUPCAREFACILITIESLANDUSE301302303304305PURPOSEThepurposeofthisSectionistosetforththeregulationsfortheareasdesignatedonExhibitAPlannedUnitDevelopmentMasterPlananddescribedinthekeyMAXIMUMPROJECTDENSITYAmaximumnumberpopulationdensityshallbelimitedtotenchildrenperacreplusstaffadultsasnecessaryorrequiredbylawGENERALDESCRIPTIONTheareasdesignatedonthePUDMasterPlanaredesignedtoaccommodateafullrangeogroupcarefacilitiesApproximateacreagesoflandusehavebeenindicatedonthePUDMasterPlaninordertoindicaterelativesizeanddistributionoftheusesTheseacreagesarebasedonconceptualdesignsandmustbeconsideredtobeapproximateActualacreagesofalldevelopmentwillbeprovidedatthetimeofsubmittalofthesitedevelopmentplanPERMITTEDPRINCIPALUSESANDSTRUCTURES1Groupcarefacilitiesincludinghousingforchildrenandstaffadministrativehealthcarerecreationalandwatermanagementfacilities2AnyotherusewhichiscomparableinnaturewiththeforegoingusesandwhichthePlanningandZoningDirectordeterminestobecompatibleinthedistrictPERRITTEDACCESSORYUSESANDSTRUCTURES1Accessoryusesandstructurescustomarilyassociatedwithusespermittedinthisdistrict2Essentialservicesandfacilities3Daycare4Gardening3126 WRNMILLEWeqTONSOLLIEKIC306DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDSlMinimumbuildingsetbackfrompropertyboundaries40feet2MinimumbuildingsetbackfromrearyardpropertyboundariesAccessoryuses20feet3Minimumseparationbetweenbuildingsonthesite20feet4MinimumseparationbetweenbuildingsonthesiteAccessoryusee10feet5Minimumbuildingsquarefootage750squarefeet6MaximumbuildingheighttwostoriesStandardsforparkinglandscapingsignsguardhousessecuritygatesandotherlandusesnotspecifiedhereinaretobeinaccordancewithCollierCountyzoningregulationsineffectatthetimepermitsarerequestedunlessotherwisespecifiedhereinUnlessotherwiseindicatedsetbackheightsandfloorareastandardsapplytoprincipalstructures32 I MILLEIIBITONOLLAPEEKINCSECTIONIVGENERALDEVELOPHENTCOIIRITMENTS402403PURPOSEThepurposeofthisSectionistosetforththedevelopmentcommitmentsoftheprojectPUDtASTERPLA1ThePUDMasterPlanWilsonMillerSartonSollPeekIncDrawingFileNumberRZ175isaniljustrativepreliminarydevelopmentplanThedesigncriteriaandlayoutiljustratedontheMasterPlanshallbeunderstoodtobeflexiblesothatthefinaldesignmaysatisfyprojectcriteriaandcomplywithallapplicablerequirementsofthisordinance2Allnecessaryeasementsdedicationsorotherinstrumentsshallbegrantedtoinsurethecontinuedoperationandmaintenanceofallserviceutilities3SitedesignchangesshallbepermittedsubjecttoCountystaffadministrativeapprovalwheresuchchangesareconsistentwiththeintentofthisPUDanddonotcausesignificantimpacttosurroundingpropertiesENVZRONMENTALPetitionershallbesubjecttoOrdinance7521orthetreevegetationremovalordinanceinexistenceatthetimeofpermittingrequiringtheacquisitionofatreeremovalpermitpriortoanylandclearingAsiteclearingplanshallbesubmittedtoEnvironmentalResourceManagementandtheCommunityDevelopmentDivisionfortheirreviewandsubjecttoapprovalpriortoanysubstantialworkonthesiteThisplanmaybesubmittedinphasestocoincidewiththedevelopmentscheduleThesiteclearingplanshallclearlydepicthowthefinalsitelayoutincorporatesretainednativevegetationtothemaximumextentpossibleandhowroadsbuildinglakesparkinglotsandotherfacilitieshaytft2mmahioal41 MILLERBARTONSOtLPEEICINC4042NativespeciesshallbeutilizedwhereavailabletothemaximumextentpossibleinthesitelandscapingdesignAlandscapeplanwillbesubmittedtoEnvironmentalResourcesManagementandtheCommunityDevelopmentDivisionfortheirreviewandapprovalThisplanwilldepicttheincorporationofnativespeciesandtheirmixwithotherspeciesifanyThegoalofsitelandscapingshallbetherecreationofnativevegetationandhabitatcharacteristicslostonthesiteduringconstructionorduetopastactivitiesAllexoticplantsasdefinedintheCountyCodeshallberemovedduringeachphaseofconstructionfromdevelopmentareasopenspaceareasandpreserveareasFollowingsitedevelopmentamaintenanceprogramshallbeimplementedtopreventreinvasionofthesitebysuchexoticspeciesThisplanwhichwilldescribecontroltechniquesandinspectionintervalsshallbefiledwithandapprovedbyEnvironmentalResourceManagementandtheCommunityDevelopmentDivision4IfduringthecourseofsiteclearingexcavationorotherconstructionalactivitiesanarchaeologicalorhistoricalsiteartifactorotherindicatorisdiscoveredalldevelopmentatthatlocationshallbeimmediatelystoppedandEnvironmentalResourceManagementnotifiedDevelopmentwillbesuspendedforasufficientlengthoftimetoenableEnvironmentalResourceManagementoradesignatedconsultanttoassessthefindanddeterminethepropercourseofactioninregardtoitssalvageabilityEnvironmentalResourceManagementwillrespondtoanysuchnotificationinatimelyandefficientmannersoastoprovideonlyaminimalinterruptiontoanyconstructionalactivitiesWATERNAGEMENT1DetailedsitedrainageplansshallbesubmittedtotheCountyEngineerfatreviewNoconstructionpermitsshallbeissuedunlessanduntilapprovaloftheproposedconstructioninaccordancewiththesubmittedplansisgrantedbytheCountyEngineer2Approvedsitegradingdrainageandwatermanagementplanshallbesubmittedwithbuildingpermitapplication42 405 UTILITIES A Water and Sewer 1 Water distribution and sewage collection and transmission systems will be constructed throughovt the project development by the developer pursuant to all current requirements of Collier County and the State of Florida Water and sewer facilities constructed within platted rightsofway or within utility easements required by the County shall be conveyed to the County for ownership operation and maintenance purposes pursuant to appropriate County Ordinances and Regulations tn effect at the time of conveyance Ail water and sewer facilities constructed on private property and not required by the County to be located within utility easements shall be owned operated and maintained by the Developer his assigns or successors Upon completion of construction of the water and sewer facilities within the project the facilities will be tested to insure they meet Collier Countys utility construction reguirements in effect at the time construction plans are approved The above tasks must be completed to the satisfaction of the Utilities Division prior to placing any utility facilities County owned or privately owned into service Upon completion of the water andor sewer facilities and prior to the Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for structures within the project the utility facilities shall be conveyed to the County when required by the Utilities Division pursuant to County Ordinances and Regulations In effect at the time conveyance is requested 2 All construction plans and technical specifications and proposed plats i applicable for the proposed water distribution and sewage collection and transmission facilities must be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Division prior to commencement of construction 3 All customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage collection facilities will be customers of the Cunty and will be billed by the County in accordance with the Countys established rates Should the County not be in a position to provide water andor sewer service to the project the water andor sewer customers shall be customers of the interim utility 43 MILLERBARTONestablishedtoservetheprojectuntiltheCountysoffsitewaterandorsewerfacilitiesareavailabletoservetheproject4ItisanticipatedthattheCountyUtilitiesDivisionwillultimatelysupplypotablewatertomeettheconsumptivedemandandorreceiveandtreatthesewagegeneratedbythisprojectShouldtheCountysystemnotbeinapositiontosupplypotablewatertotheprojectandorreceivetheprojectswastewateratthetimedevelopmentcommencestheDeveloperathisexpensewillinstallandoperateinterimwatersupplyandonsitetreatmentfacilitiesandorinterimonsitesewagetreatmentanddisposalfacilitiesadequatetomeetallrequirementsoftheappropriateregulatoryagencies5AnagreementshallbeenteredintobetweentheCountyandtheDeveloperbindingontheDeveloperhisassignsorsuccessorslegallyacceptabletotheCountypriortotheapprovalofconstructiondocumentsfortheproposedprojectstatingthataTheproposedwatersupplyandonsitetreatmentfacilitiesandoronsitewastewatertreatmentanddisposalfacilitiesifrequiredaretobeconstructedaspartoftheproposedprojectandmustberegardedasinterimstheyshallbeconstructedtoStateandFederalstandardsandaretobeownedoperatedandmaintainedbytheDeveloperhisassignsorsuccessorsuntilsuchtimeastheCountysoffsitewaterfacilitiesandoroffsitesewerfacilitiesareavailabletoservicetheprojectTheinterimtreatmentfacilitiesshallsupplyservicesonlytothoselandsownedbytheDeveloperandapprovedbytheCountyfordevelopmentTheutilityfacilitylesmaynotbeexpandedtoprovidewaterandorsewerserviceoutsidethedevelopmentboundaryapprovedbytheCountywithoutthewrittenconsentoftheCounty lltONMILLERBARTONOLtPEEICINCbcdUponconnectiontotheCountysoffsitewaterfacilitiesandorsewerfacilitiestheDeveloperhisassignsorsuccessorsshallabandondismantleandremovefromthesitetheinterimwaterandorsewagetreatmentfacilityandiscontinueuseofthewatersupplysourceifapplicableinamannerconsistentwithStateofFloridastandardsAilworkrelatedwiththisactivityshallbeperformedatnocosttotheCountyConnectiontotheCountysoffsitewaterandorsewerfacilitieswillbemadebytheownerstheirassignsorsuccessorsatnocosttotheCountywithin90daysaftersuchfacilitiesbecomeavailableThecostofconnectionshallincludebutnotbelimitedtoallengineeringdesignandpreparationofconstructiondocumentspermittingmodificationorrefittingofexistingsewagepumpingfacilitiesorconstructionofnewmastersewagepumpingfacilitiesinterconnectionwithCountyoffsitefacilitieswaterfacilitiesinterconnectionwithCountyoffsitefacilitieswaterandorsewerlinesnecessarytomaketheconnectionsetcAtthetimeCountyoffsitewaterandorsewerfacilitiesareavailablefortheprojecttoconnectwiththefollowingwaterandorsewerfacilitiesshallbeconveyedtotheCountypursuanttoappropriateCountyOrdinancesandRegulationsineffectatthetime1AllwaterandorsewerfacilitiesconstructedinpubliclyownedrightsofwayorwithinutilityeasementsrequiredbytheCountywithintheprojectlimitsrequiredtomakeconnectionwiththeCountysoffsitewaterandorsewerfacilitiesor2AllwaterandsewerfacilitiesrequiredtoconnecttheprojecttotheCountysoffsitewaterandorsewerfacilitieswhentheonsitewaterandorsewerfacilitiesareconstructedonprivatepropertyandnotrequiredbytheCountytobelocatedwithinutilityeasementsincludingbutnotlimitedtothefollowing45 WIIONMILLERBARTONSOLLPEEKINCefgaMainsewageliftstationandforcemaininterconnectingwiththeCountysewerfacilitiesincludingallutilityeasementsnecessarybWaterpointwatermeteralldistributionfacilitiesfromtheofconnectionwiththeCountysfacilitiestothemasterwaterservingtheprojectincludingutilityeasementsnecessaryThecustomersservedonaninterimbasisbytheutilitysystemconstructedbytheDevelopershallbecomecustomersoftheCountyatthetimewhenCountyoffsitewaterandorsewerfacilitiesareavailabletoservetheprojectandsuchconnectionismadePriortoconnectionoftheprojecttotheCountysoffsitewaterandorsewerfacilitiestheDeveloperhisassignsorsuccessorsshallturnovertotheCountyacompletelistofthecustomersservedbytheinterimutilitiessystemandshallnotcompetewiththeCountyfortheserviceofthosecustomersTheDevelopershallalsoprovidetheCountywithadetailedinventoryofthefacilitiesservedwithintheprojectandtheentitywhichwillberesponsibleforthewaterandorsewerservicebillingfortheprojectAilconstructionplansandtechnicalspecificationsrelatedtoconnectionstotheCountysoffsitewaterandorsewerfacilitieswillbesubmittedtotheUtilitiesDivisionforreviewandapprovalpriortocommencementofconstructionTheDeveloperhisassignsorsuccessorsagreetopayallsystemdevelopmentchargespursuanttoappropriateCountyOrdinancesunderanyofthefollowingconditionswhicheveroccursfirst1WheneversuchpersonconnectsanexistingstructuretoawatersystemandorasewersystemownedoroperatedbytheCountyor2Wheneversuchpersonappliesforabuildingpermitandpriortoissuanceofabuildingpermittoalteranexistingstructurepreviouslyconnectedtoawatersystem46 tgtlONMILLERBARTONSOLLPEEKINCandorsewersystemownedoroperatedbytheCountywheresuchalterationincreasesthepotentialdemandontheCountyssystemsor3WheneversuchpersonappliesforabuildingpermitandpriortoissuanceofabuildingpermittoconstructastructurewhichwillbeconnectedtoawatersystemandorsewersystemownedoroperatedbytheCountyunderPhases12or3oftheCountysMasterWaterandSewerPlaneventhoughsuchpersonmayreceiveinterimwaterandorinterimsewerservicefromasourceotherthantheCountyTheserequirementsshallbemadeknowntoallprospectivebuyersofpropertieswithintheprojecthTheCountywillleasetotheDeveloperforoperationandmaintenancethewaterdistributionandorsewagecollectionandtransmissionsystemforthesumof1000peryearwhensuchsystemisnotconnectedtotheoffsitewaterandorsewerfacilitiesownedandoperatedbytheCountyTermsoftheleaseshallbedetermineduponcompletionoftheproposedutilityconstructionandpriortoactivationofthewatersupplytreatmentanddistributionfacilitiesandorthesewagecollectiontransmissionandtreatmentfacilitiesTheLeaseifrequiredshallremainineffectuntiltheCountycanprovidewaterandorsewerservicethroughitsoffsitefacilitiesoruntilsuchtimethatbulkratewaterandorsewerserviceagreementsarenegotiatedwiththeinterimutilitysystemservingtheprojectBDatarequiredunderCountyOrdinanceNo80112showingtheavailabilityofsewageservicemustbesubmittedandapprovedbytheUtilitiesDivisionpriortoapprovaloftheconstructiondocumentsfortheprojectSubmitacopyoftheapprovedDERpermitsforthesewagecollectionandtransmissionsystemsandthewastewatertreatmentfacilitytobeutilizeduponreceiptthereof47 I1LONMILLERBARTONSOILPEEKINCcDEFGIfaninterimonsitewatersupplytreatmentandtransmissionfacilityisutilizedtoservetheproposedprojectitmustbeproperlysizedtosupplyaverageandpeakdaydomesticdemandinadditiontofireflowdemandatarateapprovedbytheappropriateFireControlDistrictservicingtheprojectareaConstructionandownershipofthewaterandsewerfacilitiesincludinganyproposedinterimwaterandorsewagetreatmentfacilitiesshallbeincompliancewithallUtilitiesDivisionStandardsPoliciesOrdinancesPracticesetcineffectatthetimeconstructionapprovalisrequestedDetailedhydraulicdesignreportscoveringthewaterdistributionandsewagecollectionandtransmissionsystemstoservetheprojectmustbesubmittedwiththeconstructiondocumentsfortheprojectThereportsshalllistalldesignassumptionsdemandratesandotherfactorspertinenttothesystemunderconsiderationTheprojectsonsitewaterdistributionsystemshallbeconnectedtotheDistricts8inchwatermainonWhitakerRoadandextendedthroughouttheprojectandconnectedtothenew8inchwatermainbeinginstalledbythedevelopmenttotheSouthRoyalWoodsThisrequirementshallbeiljustratedontheconstructiondocumentspreparedfortheprojectDuringdesignfeaturesshallsystemofthesefacilitiesthefollowingbeincorporatedintothedistribution1Deadendmainsshallbeeliminatedbyloopingtheinternalpipelinenetwork2StubsforfuturesysteminterconnectionwithadjacentpropertiesshallbeprovidedtotheeastsouthandwestpropertylinesoftheprojectatlocationstobemutuallyagreedtobytheUtilitiesDivisionandtheDeveloperduringthedesignphaseoftheprojectTheonsitesewagecollectionandtransmissionsystemshallbedesignedtoconnectintotheRoyalWoodssanitarysewerpumpstationandtransmissionfacilitieswhichdischargesoutherlytotheCountysLelywastewaterplantTheDevelopershallDeresponsible48 MILLERBARTONSOtLPEEKINCforobtainingallutilityeasementsnecessarytoperformthisconnectionandforallcostsassociatedwithoffsiteconnectionandmodificationstoothersewagepumpstationsandlinesConstructiondocumentsandhydraulicanalysespreparedfortheprojectshallcompletelyiljustratetheaboveconstructionitsimpactsonexistingsewerfacilitiesoftheDistrictandthetaskstobeaccomplishedtoeliminatetheimpactscreatedHTheUtilitiesDivisionwillnotbeinapositiontoapproveCertificatesofOccupancyforstructureswithintheprojectuntiltheonsiteseweragefacilitiesandwaterdistributionfacilitiespreviouslystipulatedhavebeencompletedconveyedtotheDistrictandplacedintoserviceandsatisfactorydocumentationhasbeensubmittedtotheUtilitiesAdministratorverifyingthatadequatefireflowsexistwithintheprojectsiteasspecifiedbytheUtilitiesDivisionandortheappropriateFireControlDistrictzThenecessaryplansrequiredtoincreasethecapacitybymodifyingtheonsitesewagedisposalsystemmustbeapprovedbytheCCPHUPotableutilitypermitsandwastewaterfacilityplansshallreceivedepartmentapprovalandFDERconstruction406407FIREDEPARTMENTTheDevelopershallprovidefirehydrantsrequiredtoprotectthisprojectAmaximumdistanceof500feetmeasuredfromtheroadwayshallbeallowedbetweenanystructureandafirehydrantENGINEERINGAllworkinthepublicrightofwayshallmeettherequirementsofCollierCountyOrdinance8291408IMPACTFEESTheYouthHavenprojectshallbesubjecttoallimpactfeesapplicabletoitatthetimeofprojectapprovalIntheeventfutureimpactfeesareadoptedtoassistwithschoolfireorotherpublicservicefinancingsuchfeesshallbeapplicabletotheYouthHavenprojectinaccordwiththetermsoftheadopt49 WILSONMILLERBARTONSOLLPEEKINC409LANDSCAPEDBUFFERExistingnativevegetationalongtheeasterly1000ofthesouthernboundaryshallbeleftintactasmuchasispracticableandpossibleinordertoprovideavegetativebufferln1198941037 oo 035380 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I JAMES C GILES Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Collier County Florida do hereby certify that the foregoing ts a true copy of Ordinance No 8912 which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 28th day of February 1989 during Regular Session WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County Florida this 28th day of February 1989 JAMES C GILES Clerk of Courts and Clerk Exofficio to Board of County Commissioners Deputy Clerk IOOK Owner - Youth Haven, Inc., a Florida Not For Profit Corporation 100 Please see 2018 FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT Owner - Youth Haven Foundation, Inc., a Florida Not For Profit Corporation Please see 2018 FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT Owner - Norma R. Farmilo, Trustee of the Norma R. Farmilo Trust dated 06/28/88, as amended 100 Beneficiaries are Elizabeth Louise Farmilo Mauney, Angela Marie Farmilo Coats and Robin Annette Farmilo Gambill Taft Budget LLC, 825 S. Taft, Mason City, Iowa, 50401 100 Wendell W. Corey, Sole Member 1985, 2005 & 2008 July 29, 2016 D. Wayne Arnold, AICP May 1, 2018 5867 WHITAKER ROAD NAPLES, FL 34112 Current Principal Place of Business: Current Mailing Address: 5867 WHITAKER ROAD NAPLES, FL 34112 US Entity Name:YOUTH HAVEN, INC. DOCUMENT# 717585 FEI Number: 23-7065187 Certificate of Status Desired: Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: LIGGETT, STEPHANIE J 5867 WHITAKER RD. NAPLES,, FL 34112 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Officer/Director Detail : I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am an officer or director of the corporation or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 617, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Signing Officer/Director Detail Date STEPHANIE LIGGETT FILED Feb 20, 2018 Secretary of State CC7675183775 STEPHANIE JINX LIGGETT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 02/20/2018 2018 FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT Yes 02/20/2018 Title S Name MARSHALL, BRADFORD K Address 3777 TAMIAMI TRAIL, NORTH SUITE 300 City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34103 Title IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT Name O'CONNOR, BRENDA Address 700 14TH AVENUE, SOUTH City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34102 Title VP Name BRAHMS, ERIN Address 17009 CORTILE DRIVE City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34110 Title SECRETARY Name SANTELLA, JESSICA Address 29055 TERAMO WAY City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34110 Title EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Name LIGGETT, STEPHANIE J Address 5867 WHITAKER ROAD City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34112 Title PRESIDENT Name SPELL, STEPHANIE Address 3319 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34112 Title TREASURER Name ARNALL, PATRICK Address 26373 MAHOGANY POINTE COURT City-State-Zip:BONITA SPRINGS FL 34134 5867 WHITAKER RD. NAPLES, FL 34112 Current Principal Place of Business: Current Mailing Address: 5867 WHITAKER RD. NAPLES, FL 34112 US Entity Name:YOUTH HAVEN FOUNDATION, INC. DOCUMENT# N49839 FEI Number: 65-0419424 Certificate of Status Desired: Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: LIGGETT, STEPHANIE J 5867 WHITAKER RD. NAPLES, FL 34112 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Officer/Director Detail : I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am an officer or director of the corporation or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 617, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Signing Officer/Director Detail Date STEPHANIE J. LIGGETT FILED Mar 13, 2018 Secretary of State CC2931227895 STEPHANIE JINX LIGGETT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 03/13/2018 2018 FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT Yes 03/13/2018 Title PAST PRESIDENT Name O'CONNOR, BRENDA Address 700 14TH AVENUE SOUTH City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34102 Title EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Name LIGGETT, STEPHANIE J Address 5867 WHITAKER RD. City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34112 Title SECRETARY Name SANTELLA, JESSICA Address 29055 TERAMO WAY City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34110 Title PRESIDENT Name SPELL, STEPHANIE Address 5867 WHITAKER ROAD City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34112 Title VP Name BRAHMS, ERIN Address 17009 CORTILE DRIVE City-State-Zip:NAPLES FL 34110 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 n PUD Amendment S17, T50S, R26E 00427160002, 00428200505, 00428200602 and 00427080001 5867 Whitaker Rd. and 4036 Kent Ct. Youth Haven PUD Parcel 26, 60, 59, 24 2007-AR-13286 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 Youth Haven PUD n Sharon Umpenhour 239-947-1144 sumpenhour@gradyminor.com 3/28/2018 00427160002 00428200505 00428200602 00427080001 YOUTH HAVEN CREWS RD Whitaker RD Santa Barbara BLVDRoyal Wood BLVDShedden LNCobblestone LNDeauville CIRPolly AVE Everett ST C r a n b r o o k W A Y Amberly CIR Bloomfield CIRWOODMERE LAKE CIRSource: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community ´ Youth Haven PUD Location Map Text Proposed Addition 1+/- Acre 590 0 590295 Feet YOUTH HAVEN CREWS RD Whitaker RD Santa Barbara BLVDRoyal Wood BLVDShedden LNCobblestone LNDeauville CIRPolly AVE Everett ST C r a n b r o o k W A Y Amberly CIR Bloomfield CIRWOODMERE LAKE CIRSource: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community ´ Youth Haven PUD Location Map Text Proposed Addition 1+/- Acre 590 0 590295 Feet December 18, 2017 Naples Select Senior Development, LLC c/o Evergreen Senior Housing 2040 W. 17th Street, 3rd Floor Denver, CO 80211 Attention: Mr. Bill Henry, President Reference: Protected Species Assessment Proposed Memory Care Cottages of Naples Property 5867 Whitaker Road Naples, Collier County, FL UES Project No. 0140.1700455.0000 Report No. 1516665 Dear Mr. Henry: Based on the results of the assessment conducted at the subject property there was no evidence of protected wildlife observed on the subject property. It appears the development of the property is not likely to adversely affect any species of protected wildlife. There are no federally listed critical habitat areas found on site. Further explanation can be found in the attached summary report. Please contact me at (407)423-0504 if you have any questions regarding this report. Respectfully submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. David S. Whitney Senior Environmental Scientist LOCATIONS: Atlanta Daytona Beach Fort Myers Fort Pierce Gainesville Jacksonville Miami Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) Palm Coast Panama City Pensacola Rockledge Sarasota St. Petersburg Tampa Tifton West Palm Beach Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Offices in: Orlando • Daytona Beach • Fort Myers • Gainesville • Jacksonville • Ocala • Palm Coast • Rockledge • Sarasota • Miami St. Augustine • Panama City • Fort Pierce • Leesburg • Tampa • West Palm Beach • Atlanta, GA UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROTECTED SPECIES ASSESSMENT MEMORY CARE COTTAGES OF NAPLES PROPERTY 5867 WHITAKER ROAD NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY, FL UES Project No. 0140.1700455.0000 Report No. 1516665 Date: December 18, 2017 Prepared For: Naples Select Senior Development, LLC c/o Evergreen Senior Housing 2040 W. 17th Street, 3rd Floor Denver, CO 80211 Prepared By: Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 (407)423-0504 www.uesorl.com COA# 00000549 Prepared By: ________________________________ David S. Whitney Senior Environmental Scientist TABLE OF CONTENTS TEXT Page No. 1.0 GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................... 1 3.0 WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................. 2 4.0 ASSESSMENT RESULTS:.............................................................................................. 3 5.0 SUMMARY: ..................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES 1. Vicinity/Topo Map 2. Aerial/Land Use Map 3. NRCS/SCS Soils Map APPENDICES A. Site Photos B. FNAI, FFWCC, & USFWS Data/Maps C. USFWS Indigo Snake Protection Plan/Guidelines UES Project No. 0140.1700455.0000 Report No. 1516665 Page 1 of 6 1.0 GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property is approximately 8.74+ acres in size and includes Collier County parcel numbers 00428200602, 00428200505, & 00427080001. The property is located at 5867 Whitaker Road, in Naples, Collier County, FL. The site is generally located at the southwest corner of Whitaker Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 17, Township 50 South, and Range 26 East. The subject property was vacant and forested at the time of the assessment. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS On-site land uses: The land uses described in this report are based on the Florida Department of Transportation’s handbook “Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System” 1999 edition. Currently there are two (2) land uses on the project site including uplands and wetlands (Figure 2). Photographs of each land use can be found in Appendix A. On-site habitat descriptions are as follows: FLUCCS 411: Pine Flatwoods, with 0-25% Exotics (3.16 acre/36%) The perimeter of the property consists of a pine flatwoods community. The dominant canopy species include melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and pond pine (Prunus serotina). Subdominant species include live oak (Quercus laurifolia), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) and cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). Shrubs in this habitat include Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), and tree saplings. Groundcover includes mostly bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) FLUCCS 624: Pine, Cypress, Cabbage Palm, with >50% Exotics (5.58 acres/64%) The central portion of the subject property consists a mixed forested wetland area. The dominant canopy species include melaleuca, slash pine, and pond pine. Subdominant species include earleaf acacia and cabbage palm. Shrubs in this habitat include tree saplings and Brazilian pepper. A few bald cypress trees (Taxodium distichum) are scattered throughout this habitat, but most are dead or severely stressed. Groundcover was very minimal in most areas but includes swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) and southern bob buttons (Lachnocaulon beyrichianum). Topography: The vicinity of the site has generally flat topography. The subject property is also generally flat with a slight depression toward the center of the site. Based on the data from Google Earth, the property is approximately 43 to 50 feet above sea level. Soils: According to the Soil Conservation Service, Collier County Soil Survey, surficial soils at the subject property are classified as Malabar fine sand (0-2% slopes), Hallandale fine sand (0-2% slopes), & Pineda fine sand (limestone substratum, 0-2% slopes). See Figure 3 for soils map. UES Project No. 0140.1700455.0000 Report No. 1516665 Page 2 of 6 A brief description of the on-site soil type is as follows: 3. Malabar Fine Sand (0-2% slopes): This soil is classified as poorly drained and is found on drainageways and flats of marine terraces. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of 0 to 12 inches under normal conditions. 11. Hallandale Fine Sand (0-2% slopes): This soil is classified as poorly drained and is found on flatwoods of marine terraces. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of 6 to 18 inches under normal conditions. 14. Pineda Fine Sand (Limestone Substratum, 0-2% slopes): This soil is classified as poorly drained and is found on drainageways and flats of marine terraces. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of 0 to 12 inches under normal conditions. Drainage: The site has no formal drainage system in place. Runoff likely percolates into the ground on-site due to the perimeter of the site being higher than the center of the site. There is a swale in the right of way of Whitaker Road on the north end of the site. Adjacent Land Uses: The site is in a moderately developed residential area. The adjoining properties to the east include a new 4-lane highway (Santa Barbara Blvd.). The adjoining property to the south includes a residential townhome community. The adjoining property to the west includes undeveloped land and a youth housing community. The adjoining properties to the north include Whitaker Road and undeveloped lands. 3.0 WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY UES staff scientists reviewed the property for signs of utilization or presence of any flora or fauna listed as protected by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC), and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) based on known habitat preference and geographical distribution. The field assessment was performed on December 12. Weather conditions were partly cloudy and 70 to 75 degrees with little to no wind during the field assessment. The protected species assessment included: (1) A review of aerial photographs to assess past uses and the potential for protected wildlife based on geographic area and ecological significance. UES Project No. 0140.1700455.0000 Report No. 1516665 Page 3 of 6 (2) A review of numerous databases and reference materials including, but not limited to, those provided by the USFWS, FFWCC, and FNAI to determine the potential species of protected wildlife that may inhabit or utilize the subject property (Appendix B). (3) Site reconnaissance to evaluate existing site conditions. This included quiet observation for 15-20 minutes at various locations on the property. The assessment covered approximately 75% of the subject property via pedestrian transects. (4) A review of the FFWCC eagle nest database website for nearby bald eagle nesting sites and the waterbird colony locator for known wading bird nesting areas (Appendix B). (5) A review of the species occurrence data available from the FFWCC and Fish and Wildlife Research Institute. 4.0 ASSESSMENT RESULTS: 4.1 POTENTIAL PROTECTED WILDLIFE Based on the existing habitat found on site, the surrounding land uses, field observations, and the data obtained from the USFWS, FNAI, and FFWCC (Appendix B), the site has minimal potential to provide adequate habitat to support nesting and/or foraging by a few listed species. The species of protected wildlife that are most likely to be found utilizing the site include the gopher tortoise, eastern indigo snake, and the Florida burrowing owl. The site provides poor to fair burrowing and/or foraging habitat for the tortoise and burrowing owl. The site is in an area with a mosaic of uplands and wetlands with large undeveloped properties generally contiguous with the exception of Whitaker Road as a developed barrier. The presence of large undeveloped tracts increases the potential for the eastern indigo snake to be found utilizing the subject property. The current listed status and potential for specific species to utilize the site are discussed in Table 1 below. TABLE 1: Potential for individual listed species to occur on the subject property. Common Name Scientific Name Status *(FWC/USFWS) Potential (low, moderate, high) Comments Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus T/None Low The shallow water table and density of rooted vegetation significantly reduces the potential for this species to be found on-site. Uplands on adjacent properties could currently have tortoise populations. No evidence of tortoises was observed during the assessment. UES Project No. 0140.1700455.0000 Report No. 1516665 Page 4 of 6 FL Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia floridana SSC/None Low- Moderate The open areas along the east and south edges of the site could be utilized for burrowing by this species. Burrowing owls have not been well documented in the vicinity of the subject property in the past. No burrows were observed on the property at the time of the assessment. Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon couperi T/T Moderate The site has potential foraging and nesting habitat for this species. The large undeveloped areas to the north and east of the subject property increase the potential to see this species foraging or nesting around/on the subject property. The residential, and transportation uses surrounding the site likely reduce the potential for this species to be found utilizing the site. Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus N/N Protected under Bald and Golden Eagle Act Low- Moderate The subject property has very few larger pines that could provide a nesting opportunity for this species. The closest known nesting site is located approximately 2.14 miles west of the property. Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi E/E Low The FWC database indicates that this species has been documented near the suhject property in the past. No evidence of this species was observed on the subject property. Surrounding development likely reduces the potential for this species to be found utilizing the subject property. *SSC-species of special concern, T-threatened, E-endangered 4.2 OBSERVED PROTECTED WILDLIFE/PLANTS The results of the assessment found no direct evidence that the subject property is inhabited or utilized by any species of protected wildlife. There were no nests, dens, tracks, or scat UES Project No. 0140.1700455.0000 Report No. 1516665 Page 5 of 6 observed indicate any protected species could be found on-site. No listed plant species were observed during the assessment. The closest known eagle nest is located approximately 2.14 miles west of the subject property (Appendix A). UES observed multiple listed plant species on-site during the assessment. Listed plants observed included common wild pine (Tillandisa fasciculata), giant wild pine (Tillandsia utriculata), and northern needleleaf (Tillandsia balbisiana). The giant wild pine and common wild pine species are listed as endangered by the FDACS. The northern needleleaf is listed as threatened by the FDACS. No other listed plant species were observed during the assessment. 4.3 NON-PROTECTED WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS/EVIDENCE Non-protected wildlife evidence observed on-site during the site visit included direct observations of the blue-gray gnatcatcher, gray squirrel, black vulture, and brown anole. 5.0 SUMMARY: The results of the assessment found that there is minimal potential for development of the subject property to affect a few protected species. These concerns are described in more detail below. Eastern Indigo Snake: The site does contain potential nesting and foraging habitat for the eastern indigo snake. The eastern indigo snake is listed as “Threatened” pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (state and federal level). The USFWS may recommend that the Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake be implemented on the site during future construction activities. On properties where indigo snakes may be found, and protection measures are going to be implemented during construction, no further action is required as long as the standard measures for protection are utilized. The standard measures typically include placing of signage at construction site entrances and in the construction office, along with educating construction staff on how to identify the indigo snake and what steps to take if one is observed or one is found injured/dead during construction activities. A copy of the “standard protection measures for eastern indigo snakes” is included in Appendix C of this report. Summaries of recommended actions and samples of signage and pamphlets that can be utilized on the project site can be found on- line on the USFWS website. http://www.fws.gov/northflorida/IndigoSnakes/20130812_Eastern_indigo_snake_Standard _Protection_Measures.htm Gopher Tortoise & FL Burrowing Owl: The subject property contains poor to fair quality burrowing and foraging habitat for the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). This species is listed as “Threatened” by the FFWCC and is not federally listed in Florida by the USFWS. No evidence of this species was observed during this assessment. There is also very limited potential for this species to be present on adjoining properties, which would allow them to relocate to the subject property. Because there is at least some potential for tortoises to relocate from adjoining properties, UES recommends a 100% survey of the UES Project No. 0140.1700455.0000 Report No. 1516665 Page 6 of 6 upland areas on the property prior to construction commencement or land clearing activities. If any burrows are found prior to construction activities, the appropriate gopher tortoise relocation permit should be obtained from the FFWCC, and the tortoises with burrows located within 25’ of areas to be disturbed should be relocated to an off-site recipient site. The site can be surveyed for FL burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia floridana) burrows at the same time as the tortoise burrows. Owls have not been well documented in the area of the subject property in the past. In summary, the results of the assessment found no direct evidence that the subject property is currently being utilized by any species of protected wildlife. There are no critical habitat areas on site. Three listed plant species were observed on-site. Based on the existing habitat found on site, the surrounding land uses, field observations, and the data obtained from the FNAI and FWC (Appendix B), it appears the development of the subject property has very minimal potential to have an adverse effect a few listed species. A gopher tortoise burrow survey within 100% of the upland areas on the site is recommended within 90 days prior to future development/clearing on the site to confirm if any tortoises or FL burrowing owls are present at that time. The site appears to provide potential habitat for the Eastern indigo snake and therefore the standard measures for the protection of the indigo snake should be implemented on-site during land clearing activities. The development of the subject property is not likely to have an adverse effect on any other species of protected wildlife other than those previously discussed above. This assessment represents the results of our review on the date indicated. UES accepts no responsibility for recruitment of protected wildlife to the site following the date(s) of this assessment. The USFWS, FFWCC, and local government agencies may request additional assessments and/or surveys at any time. Universal Engineering Sciences is pleased to provide this preliminary protected species assessment report for the above referenced site. If there are any comments and/or questions regarding this report, please contact David Whitney at (407) 423-0504. FIGURE 1 VICINITY/TOPO MAP APPROX. SITE LOCATION N.F.12 - 8 - 17 AS SHOWN 0140.1700455.0000 A-1 PROTECTED SPECIES ASSESSMENT PROPOSED MEMORY CARE COTTAGES OF NAPLES 5867 WHITAKER ROAD NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SITE LOCATION MAP 0 SCALE (FT.) 2000 17-0583-01SOURCE: USGS QUADRANGLE MAP OF "BELLE MEADE, FLORIDA". D.W. # - - FIGURE 2 AERIAL/LAND USE MAP 624 411 N.F. AS SHOWN FLUCCS MAP / 2017 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 0 SCALE (FT.) 200 411 - PINE FLATWOODS [0-25% EXOTICS] ( 3.16 ac / 36%) FLUCCS LEGEND AERIAL PHOTO SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH FIGURE 2 12 - 8 - 17 0140.1700455.0000 PROTECTED SPECIES ASSESSMENT PROPOSED MEMORY CARE COTTAGES OF NAPLES 5867 WHITAKER ROAD NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 17-0583-01D.W. 624 - PINE, CYPRESS, CABBAGE PALM [>50% EXOTICS] ( 5.58 ac / 64%) FIGURE 3 SOILS MAP 3 11 N.F. AS SHOWN USDA - NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP 0 SCALE (FT.) 200 SOIL DATA SOURCE: USDA-NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY 3 - MALABAR FINE SAND, 0 - 2 % SLOPES SOILS LEGEND AERIAL PHOTO SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH FIGURE 3 12 - 8 - 17 0140.1700455.0000 PROTECTED SPECIES ASSESSMENT PROPOSED MEMORY CARE COTTAGES OF NAPLES 5867 WHITAKER ROAD NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 17-0583-01D.W. 11 - HALLANDALE FINE SAND, 0 - 2 % SLOPES 14 - PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, 0 - 2 % SLOPES APPENDIX A SITE PHOTOS PHOTO #1 – View from the northwest property corner facing east along the north property boundary. PHOTO #2 - View from the northeast property corner facing south along the west property boundary. Page 1 PHOTO #3 – View within the central wetland area on the property. PHOTO #4 - View of the wetland and pine flatwood upland edge in the northwest portion of the property. Page 2 PHOTO #3 – View from the center of the south property boundary facing east. PHOTO #4 - View from the center of the south property boundary facing west. Page 3 PHOTO #5 – View from the southeast property corner facing north along the east property boundary. PHOTO #6 - View from the northeast property corner facing south along the east property boundary. Page 4 PHOTO #7 – View from the northeast property corner facing west along the north property boundary. PHOTO #8 - View of the pine flatwood upland fringe (front of photo) and the forested wetland (at rear of photo). Page 5 APPENDIX B FNAI, FFWCC, USFWS DATA/MAPS This report was generated using the bald eagle nest locator at https://public.myfwc.com /FWRI/EagleNests/nestlocator.aspx on 12/11/2017 9:34:05 AM. Search Entered:Within 5 miles of 5867 whitaker road, naples, fl (latitude 26.121059 and longitude -81.722195); All Search Results 11 record(s) were found; 11 record(s) are shown Bald Eagle Nest Map: Bald Eagle Nest Data Search Results:Results per page: Nest ID County Latitude Longitude Town- ship Ran- ge Sec- tion Gaz Page Last Known Active Last Sur- veyed Act 12 Act 13 Act 14 Act 15 Act 16 Dist. (Mi) CO003 Collier 26 03.05 81 44.48 51S 26E 06 111 2013 2013 * Y * * * 4.99 CO009 Collier 26 05.90 81 46.75 50S 25E 23 111 2013 2013 * Y * * * 3.86 CO010 Collier 26 05.00 81 45.00 50S 25E 25 111 1980 2013 * - * * * 3.12 CO023Collier26 09.0881 44.8250S26E0611120162016****Y2.59 CO024 Collier 26 05.86 81 44.91 50S 26E 19 111 2013 2013 * Y * * * 2.30 CO027 Collier 26 09.13 81 46.85 50S 25E 02 111 2014 2014 * Y Y * * 4.22 CO028 Collier 26 04.58 81 45.57 50S 25E 36 111 2014 2014 * Y Y * * 3.86 CO035 Collier 26 03.82 81 45.47 51S 25E 01 111 2013 2013 * Y * * * 4.54 CO040Collier26 07.4281 45.4050S25E1311120162016****Y2.14 CO054 Collier 26 10.75 81 44.88 49S 26E 30 111 2015 2015 * * Y Y * 4.33 Print Bald Eagle Nest Data https://publictemp.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/PrintData.aspx 1 of 2 12/11/2017, 9:34 AM CO056Collier26 08.9181 40.7750S26E0211120162016****Y3.25 "Y" denotes an active nest "U" denotes a nest that was visited but status was undetermined "N" denotes an inactive nest "*" denotes a nest that was not surveyed "-" denotes an unobserved nest Print Bald Eagle Nest Data https://publictemp.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/PrintData.aspx 2 of 2 12/11/2017, 9:34 AM NOTE: The Biodiversity Matrix includes only rare species and natural communities tracked by FNAI. Report for 1 Matrix Unit: 40535 Descriptions DOCUMENTED - There is a documented occurrence in the FNAI database of the species or community within this Matrix Unit. DOCUMENTED-HISTORIC - There is a documented occurrence in the FNAI database of the species or community within this Matrix Unit; however the occurrence has not been observed/reported within the last twenty years. LIKELY - The species or community is known to occur in this vicinity, and is considered likely within this Matrix Unit because: 1. documented occurrence overlaps this and adjacent Matrix Units, but the documentation isn’t precise enough to indicate which of those Units the species or community is actually located in; or 2. there is a documented occurrence in the vicinity and there is suitable habitat for that species or community within this Matrix Unit. POTENTIAL - This Matrix Unit lies within the known or predicted range of the species or community based on expert knowledge and environmental variables such as climate, soils, topography, and landcover. Matrix Unit ID: 40535 0 Documented Elements Found 0 Documented-Historic Elements Found 4 Likely Elements Found Scientific and Common Names Global Rank State Rank Federal Status State Listing Mesic flatwoods G4 S4 N N G3 S2 LE FE 1018 Thomasville Road Suite 200-C Tallahassee, FL 32303 850-224-8207 850-681-9364 fax www.fnai.org Florida Natural Areas Inventory Biodiversity Matrix Query Results UNOFFICIAL REPORT Created 12/11/2017 (Contact the FNAI Data Services Coordinator at 850.224.8207 for information on an official Standard Data Report) Page 1 of 3FNAI Biodiversity Matrix 12/11/2017http://data.labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrix/GridSearch.cfm?sel_id=40535&extent=... Picoides borealis Red-cockaded Woodpecker Sciurus niger avicennia Mangrove Fox Squirrel G5T2 S2 N ST Ursus americanus floridanus Florida Black Bear G5T2 S2 N N Matrix Unit ID: 40535 16 Potential Elements for Matrix Unit 40535 Scientific and Common Names Global Rank State Rank Federal Status State Listing Andropogon arctatus Pine-woods Bluestem G3 S3 N T Athene cunicularia floridana Florida Burrowing Owl G4T3 S3 N SSC Drymarchon couperi Eastern Indigo Snake G3 S3 LT FT Elytraria caroliniensis var. angustifolia Narrow-leaved Carolina Scalystem G4T2 S2 N N Eumops floridanus Florida bonneted bat G1 S1 LE FE Gopherus polyphemus Gopher Tortoise G3 S3 C ST Lechea cernua Nodding Pinweed G3 S3 N T Linum carteri var. smallii Small's Flax G2T2 S2 N E Mustela frenata peninsulae Florida Long-tailed Weasel G5T3 S3 N N Nemastylis floridana Celestial Lily G2 S2 N E Patagioenas leucocephala White-crowned Pigeon G3 S3 N ST Polyrrhiza lindenii Ghost Orchid G2G4 S2 N E Puma concolor coryi Florida Panther G5T1 S1 LE FE Rostrhamus sociabilis Snail Kite G4G5 S2 LE N Roystonea elata Florida Royal Palm G2G3 S2 N E Sceloporus woodi Florida Scrub Lizard G2G3 S2S3 N N Disclaimer The data maintained by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory represent the single most comprehensive source of information available on the locations of rare species and other significant ecological resources statewide. However, the data are not always based on comprehensive or site-specific field surveys. Therefore, this information should not be regarded as a final statement on the biological resources of the site being considered, nor should it be substituted for on-site surveys. FNAI shall not be held liable for the accuracy and completeness of these data, or opinions or conclusions drawn from these data. FNAI is not inviting reliance on these data. Inventory data are designed for the purposes of conservation planning and scientific research and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Unofficial Report Page 2 of 3FNAI Biodiversity Matrix 12/11/2017http://data.labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrix/GridSearch.cfm?sel_id=40535&extent=... These results are considered unofficial. FNAI offers a Standard Data Request option for those needing certifiable data. Page 3 of 3FNAI Biodiversity Matrix 12/11/2017http://data.labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrix/GridSearch.cfm?sel_id=40535&extent=... IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site- Local office South Florida Ecological Services Field Office (772) 562-3909 Ɠ (772) 562-4288 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3559 http://fws.gov/verobeach U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaCInformation for Planning and Consultation Page 1 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location: Mammals NAME STATUS Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8630 Endangered Florida Panther Puma (=Felis) concolor coryi No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1763 Endangered Page 2 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources Birds Puma (=mountain Lion)Puma (=Felis) concolor (all subsp. except coryi) No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6049 SAT West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469 Threatened Marine mammal https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8230 Kirtland's Warbler Setophaga kirtlandii (= Dendroica kirtlandii) No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8078 Endangered Piping Plover Charadrius melodus There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039 Threatened Page 3 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864 Threatened Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614 Endangered Wood Stork Mycteria americana No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477 Threatened NAME STATUS Atlantic Sturgeon (gulf Subspecies) Acipenser oxyrinchus (=oxyrhynchus) desotoi There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/651 Threatened Page 4 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources Insects THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION. Migratory birds NAME STATUS Bartram's Hairstreak Butterfly Strymon acis bartrami There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4837 Endangered Florida Leafwing Butterfly Anaea troglodyta floridalis There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6652 Endangered Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act . Any activity that results in the take (to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct) of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless authorized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1 2 Page 5 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources . There are no provisions for allowing the take of migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in the take of migratory birds is responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations and implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) Additional information can be found using the following links: • Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ 3 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8935 Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC), but is of concern in this area either because of the Eagle Act, or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626 Breeds Mar 20 to Sep 15 Black Skimmer Rynchops niger This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5234 Breeds May 20 to Sep 15 Page 6 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources Black-whiskered Vireo Vireo altiloquus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Breeds May 1 to Aug 15 Henslow's Sparrow Ammodramus henslowii This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3941 Breeds elsewhere King Rail Rallus elegans This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the Breeds May 1 to Sep 5 Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds May 10 to Sep 10 Reddish Egret Egretta rufescens This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7617 Breeds Mar 1 to Sep 15 Page 7 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources Probability of Presence Summary The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Probability of Presence () Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds elsewhere Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9480 Breeds elsewhere Short-tailed Hawk Buteo brachyurus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Breeds Mar 1 to Jun 30 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Page 8 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in your project's counties during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC American Oystercatcher BCC Rangewide (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.) Page 9 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable (This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC), but is of concern in this area either because of the Eagle Act, or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.) Black Skimmer BCC Rangewide (CON) BCC Rangewide (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.) Limpkin BCC Rangewide (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.) Page 10 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources Magnificent Frigatebird BCC Rangewide (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.) Mangrove Cuckoo BCC Rangewide (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.) Short-billed Dowitcher BCC Rangewide (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.) Page 11 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources Short-tailed Hawk BCC - BCR (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA) Swallow-tailed Kite BCC Rangewide (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.) Alaska.) Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Such measures are particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. To see when birds are most likely to occur in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Special attention should be made to look for nests and avoid nest destruction during the breeding season. The best information about when birds are breeding can be found in Birds of North America (BNA) Online under the "Breeding Phenology" section of each species profile. Note that accessing this information may require a subscription. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? Page 12 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that might be affected by activities in your project location. These birds are of priority concern because it has been determined that without additional conservation actions, they are likely to become candidates for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets. The AKN list represents all birds reported to be occurring at some level throughout the year in the counties in which your project lies. That list is then narrowed to only the Birds of Conservation Concern for your project area. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list only includes species of particular priority concern, and is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, special attention should be made to avoid and minimize impacts to birds of priority concern. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the E-bird Explore Data Tool. 3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). Avoidance and minimization measures should be implemented to reduce impacts to birds on your list, and all other birds that may occur in your project area. Nationwide Standard Conservation Measures can be applied for any project, regardless of project type or location. If measures exist that are specific to your activity or to any of the species on your list that are confirmed to exist at your project area, these should also be considered for implementation in addition to the Nationwide Standard Conservation Measures. Implementation of avoidance and minimization measures is particularly important for BCC birds of rangewide concern. If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you will need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the BGEPA should such impacts occur. Page 13 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. Page 14 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources Marine mammals Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also protected under the Endangered Species Act and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora . The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals under these acts are shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Marine mammals that fall under the responsibility of NMFS are not shown on this list. 1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. Fish hatcheries THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION. Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. 1 2 Page 15 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. This location overlaps the following wetlands: Data limitations geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND PFO4Ad A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website: https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/wetlands/decoder Page 16 of 16IPaC: Explore Location 12/18/2017https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/7ROAFE6O3NAXDBCRX2NUAMMC7E/resources APPENDIX C EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE PROTECTION MEASURES STANDARD PROTECTION MEASURES FOR THE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service August 12, 2013 The eastern indigo snake protection/education plan (Plan) below has been developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in Florida for use by applicants and their construction personnel. At least 30 days prior to any clearing/land alteration activities, the applicant shall notify the appropriate USFWS Field Office via e-mail that the Plan will be implemented as described below (North Florida Field Office: jaxregs@fws.gov; South Florida Field Office: verobeach@fws.gov; Panama City Field Office: panamacity@fws.gov). As long as the signatory of the e-mail certifies compliance with the below Plan (including use of the attached poster and brochure), no further written confirmation or “approval” from the USFWS is needed and the applicant may move forward with the project. If the applicant decides to use an eastern indigo snake protection/education plan other than the approved Plan below, written confirmation or “approval” from the USFWS that the plan is adequate must be obtained. At least 30 days prior to any clearing/land alteration activities, the applicant shall submit their unique plan for review and approval. The USFWS will respond via e- mail, typically within 30 days of receiving the plan, either concurring that the plan is adequate or requesting additional information. A concurrence e-mail from the appropriate USFWS Field Office will fulfill approval requirements. The Plan materials should consist of: 1) a combination of posters and pamphlets (see Poster Information section below); and 2) verbal educational instructions to construction personnel by supervisory or management personnel before any clearing/land alteration activities are initiated (see Pre-Construction Activities and During Construction Activities sections below). POSTER INFORMATION Posters with the following information shall be placed at strategic locations on the construction site and along any proposed access roads (a final poster for Plan compliance, to be printed on 11” x 17” or larger paper and laminated, is attached): DESCRIPTION: The eastern indigo snake is one of the largest non-venomous snakes in North America, with individuals often reaching up to 8 feet in length. They derive their name from the glossy, blue-black color of their scales above and uniformly slate blue below. Frequently, they have orange to coral reddish coloration in the throat area, yet some specimens have been reported to only have cream coloration on the throat. These snakes are not typically aggressive and will attempt to crawl away when disturbed. Though indigo snakes rarely bite, they should NOT be handled. SIMILAR SNAKES: The black racer is the only other solid black snake resembling the eastern indigo snake. However, black racers have a white or cream chin, thinner bodies, and WILL BITE if handled. LIFE HISTORY: The eastern indigo snake occurs in a wide variety of terrestrial habitat types throughout Florida. Although they have a preference for uplands, they also utilize some wetlands 1 and agricultural areas. Eastern indigo snakes will often seek shelter inside gopher tortoise burrows and other below- and above-ground refugia, such as other animal burrows, stumps, roots, and debris piles. Females may lay from 4 - 12 white eggs as early as April through June, with young hatching in late July through October. PROTECTION UNDER FEDERAL AND STATE LAW: The eastern indigo snake is classified as a Threatened species by both the USFWS and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. “Taking” of eastern indigo snakes is prohibited by the Endangered Species Act without a permit. “Take” is defined by the USFWS as an attempt to kill, harm, harass, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, trap, capture, collect, or engage in any such conduct. Penalties include a maximum fine of $25,000 for civil violations and up to $50,000 and/or imprisonment for criminal offenses, if convicted. Only individuals currently authorized through an issued Incidental Take Statement in association with a USFWS Biological Opinion, or by a Section 10(a)(1)(A) permit issued by the USFWS, to handle an eastern indigo snake are allowed to do so. IF YOU SEE A LIVE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THE SITE: • Cease clearing activities and allow the live eastern indigo snake sufficient time to move away from the site without interference; • Personnel must NOT attempt to touch or handle snake due to protected status. • Take photographs of the snake, if possible, for identification and documentation purposes. • Immediately notify supervisor or the applicant’s designated agent, and the appropriate USFWS office, with the location information and condition of the snake. • If the snake is located in a vicinity where continuation of the clearing or construction activities will cause harm to the snake, the activities must halt until such time that a representative of the USFWS returns the call (within one day) with further guidance as to when activities may resume. IF YOU SEE A DEAD EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THE SITE: • Cease clearing activities and immediately notify supervisor or the applicant’s designated agent, and the appropriate USFWS office, with the location information and condition of the snake. • Take photographs of the snake, if possible, for identification and documentation purposes. • Thoroughly soak the dead snake in water and then freeze the specimen. The appropriate wildlife agency will retrieve the dead snake. Telephone numbers of USFWS Florida Field Offices to be contacted if a live or dead eastern indigo snake is encountered: North Florida Field Office – (904) 731-3336 Panama City Field Office – (850) 769-0552 South Florida Field Office – (772) 562-3909 2 PRE-CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 1. The applicant or designated agent will post educational posters in the construction office and throughout the construction site, including any access roads. The posters must be clearly visible to all construction staff. A sample poster is attached. 2. Prior to the onset of construction activities, the applicant/designated agent will conduct a meeting with all construction staff (annually for multi-year projects) to discuss identification of the snake, its protected status, what to do if a snake is observed within the project area, and applicable penalties that may be imposed if state and/or federal regulations are violated. An educational brochure including color photographs of the snake will be given to each staff member in attendance and additional copies will be provided to the construction superintendent to make available in the onsite construction office (a final brochure for Plan compliance, to be printed double-sided on 8.5” x 11” paper and then properly folded, is attached). Photos of eastern indigo snakes may be accessed on USFWS and/or FWC websites. 3. Construction staff will be informed that in the event that an eastern indigo snake (live or dead) is observed on the project site during construction activities, all such activities are to cease until the established procedures are implemented according to the Plan, which includes notification of the appropriate USFWS Field Office. The contact information for the USFWS is provided on the referenced posters and brochures. DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 1. During initial site clearing activities, an onsite observer may be utilized to determine whether habitat conditions suggest a reasonable probability of an eastern indigo snake sighting (example: discovery of snake sheds, tracks, lots of refugia and cavities present in the area of clearing activities, and presence of gopher tortoises and burrows). 2. If an eastern indigo snake is discovered during gopher tortoise relocation activities (i.e. burrow excavation), the USFWS shall be contacted within one business day to obtain further guidance which may result in further project consultation. 3. Periodically during construction activities, the applicant’s designated agent should visit the project area to observe the condition of the posters and Plan materials, and replace them as needed. Construction personnel should be reminded of the instructions (above) as to what is expected if any eastern indigo snakes are seen. POST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Whether or not eastern indigo snakes are observed during construction activities, a monitoring report should be submitted to the appropriate USFWS Field Office within 60 days of project completion. The report can be sent electronically to the appropriate USFWS e-mail address listed on page one of this Plan. 3 ATTENTION: THREATENED EASTERN INDIGO SNAKES MAY BE PRESENT ON THIS SITE!!! IF YOU SEE A LIVE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THE SITE: •Cease clearing activities and allow the eastern indigo snake sufficient time to move away from the site without interference. •Personnel must NOT attempt to touch or handle snake due to protected status. •Take photographs of the snake, if possible, for identification and documentation purposes. •Immediately notify supervisor or the applicant’s designated agent, and the appropriate U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) office, with the location information and condition of the snake. •If the snake is located in a vicinity where continuation of the clearing or construction activities will cause harm to the snake, the activities must halt until such time that a representative of the USFWS returns the call (within one day) with further guidance as to when activities may resume. IF YOU SEE A DEAD EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THE SITE: •Cease clearing activities and immediately notify supervisor or the applicant’s designated agent, and the appropriate USFWS office, with the location information and condition of the snake. •Take photographs of the snake, if possible, for identification and documentation purposes. •Thoroughly soak the dead snake in water and then freeze the specimen. The appropriate wildlife agency will retrieve the dead snake. USFWS Florida Field Offices to be contacted if a live or dead eastern indigo snake is encountered: North Florida Field Office – (904) 731-3336 Panama City Field Office – (850) 769-0552 South Florida Field Office – (772) 562-3909 Killing, harming, or harassing indigo snakes is strictly prohibited and punishable under State and Federal Law. DESCRIPTION: The eastern indigo snake is one of the largest non-venomous snakes in North America, with individuals often reaching up to 8 feet in length. They derive their name from the glossy, blue-black color of their scales above and uniformly slate blue below. Frequently, they have orange to coral reddish coloration in the throat area, yet some specimens have been reported to only have cream coloration on the throat. These snakes are not typically aggressive and will attempt to crawl away when disturbed. Though indigo snakes rarely bite, they should NOT be handled. SIMILAR SNAKES: The black racer is the only other solid black snake resembling the eastern indigo snake. However, black racers have a white or cream chin, thinner bodies, and WILL BITE if handled. LIFE HISTORY: The eastern indigo snake occurs in a wide variety of terrestrial habitat types throughout Florida. Although they have a preference for uplands, they also utilize some wetlands and agricultural areas. Eastern indigo snakes will often seek shelter inside gopher tortoise burrows and other below- and above- ground refugia, such as other animal burrows, stumps, roots, and debris piles. Females may lay from 4 - 12 white eggs as early as April through June, with young hatching in late July through October. PROTECTION: The eastern indigo snake is classified as a Threatened species by both the USFWS and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. “Taking” of eastern indigo snakes is prohibited by the Endangered Species Act without a permit. “Take” is defined by the USFWS as an attempt to kill, harm, harass, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, trap, capture, collect, or engage in any such conduct. Penalties include a maximum fine of $25,000 for civil violations and up to $50,000 and/or imprisonment for criminal offenses, if convicted. Only individuals currently authorized through an issued Incidental Take Statement in association with a USFWS Biological Opinion, or by a Section 10(a)(1)(A) permit issued by the USFWS, to handle an eastern indigo snake are allowed to do so. Photo: Dirk Stevenson August 12, 2013 December 18, 2017 Naples Select Senior Development, LLC c/o Evergreen Senior Housing 2040 W. 17th Street, 3rd Floor Denver, CO 80211 Attention: Mr. Bill Henry, President RE: Wetland & Mitigation Assessment Report Proposed Memory Care Cottages of Naples Property 5867 Whitaker Road Naples, Collier County, FL UES Project No. 0140.1700455.0000 UES Report No. 1515822 Dear Mr. Henry: The purpose of this report is to provide you with the results of the wetland assessment and mitigation assessment performed at the above-referenced site for your use. The subject property includes two parcels totaling 8.74+ acres in size and is located at the southwest corner of . The purpose of this assessment was to determine if wetlands and/or surface waters exist on the subject property that may be considered jurisdictional by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) pursuant to Chapter 62-340 of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) pursuant to the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. This assessment was performed with database and aerial map review, followed by field reconnaissance. Wetlands were also flagged/delineated to be picked up by the client’s surveyor. Surveying of wetland flags was not completed by the time of issuance of this report. Results: The results of our wetland assessment concluded that there is one area of wetlands totaling approximately 5.58 acres on the subject property. No other wetlands or surface waters were observed on the property. There are approximately 3.16 acres of uplands on the property. LOCATIONS: Atlanta Daytona Beach Fort Myers Fort Pierce Gainesville Jacksonville Miami Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) Palm Coast Panama City Pensacola Rockledge Sarasota St. Petersburg Tampa Tifton West Palm Beach Wetland & Mitigation Memory Care Cottages, Naples Naples, Collier County, FL UES Project No. 0140.17004556.0000 UES Report No. 1515822 Page 2 of 2 2 Wetland Delineation/Methodology: The boundary of the wetland area was marked by GPS and flagged by Universal Engineering Sciences on December 12, 2017. The GPS points locating the approximate boundary of wetlands on the property are used in the attached Figure 1 (Wetland Assessment Map). The indicators used to delineate the wetland boundary included presence of hydrophytic vegetation, evidence of hydrology, and hydric soil indicators. The wetland area on the site is considered a cypress, pine, and cabbage palm wetland. The dominant canopy trees are actually melaleuca, which is considered a nuisance exotic species. Sub-dominant canopy species include slash pine, pond pine, cabbage palm, and ear-leaf acacia. Earleaf acacia is also an invasive exotic species. A few bald cypress trees were observed in the wetland. However, the cypress trees observed were mostly dead stumps or severely stressed which can be an indication of change in hydrology. Shrubs are very minimal, but include saplings of tree species, Brazilian pepper around the perimeter, and a few carrotwood shrubs intermixed. Both Brazilian pepper and carrotwood are also invasive exotic species. Groundcover within the wetland areas is minimal as well but includes southern bog button and swamp fern. Uplands around the wetland are pine flatwoods where slash pine dominates the canopy, saw palmetto dominates the shrub layer, and bracken fern is the dominant groundcover. The on-site wetland appears to have been significantly impacted by a drainage swale/ditch along the north property boundary, a large canal bordering the east end of the property, and the presence of greater than 50% exotic and nuisance species, including melaleuca, ear-leaf acacia, and Brazilian pepper. Jurisdiction: The on-site wetland appears to be isolated (i.e. not connected to other surface waters and wetlands) due to berms along the north, east, and south property boundaries. The wetland does not appear to have a direct connection to the off-site surface waters located just off-site along the north and east property boundaries. Therefore, the on-site wetland and swale may only be jurisdictional to the South Florida Water Management District (SJRWMD) and Collier County. Collier County defers to the SJRWMD, FDEP, and ACOE for wetland permit and mitigation review. However, there are policies in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of Collier County’s Growth Management Plan that are required to be implemented by new developments so the project will be consisted with the CCME. The most significant items appear to be 1) the requirement to eradicate nuisance exotic species within areas of the property to be preserved and maintain these species to avoid re-infestation (Preserve Management Wetland & Mitigation Memory Care Cottages, Naples Naples, Collier County, FL UES Project No. 0140.17004556.0000 UES Report No. 1515822 Page 2 of 2 3 Plan will need to be implemented) and 2) a permanent Conservation Easement will need to be provided over the remaining upland and wetland areas to be preserved. The wetland delineation line will need to be verified by the SJRWMD staff prior to or during the environmental resource permitting process. Because the isolated wetland area is currently estimated at greater than 0.5 acre in size, compensatory mitigation for proposed impacts will be required by the SJRWMD if impacts are approved. The ACOE will need to review the site to determine if they will claim jurisdiction based on whether they believe there is a hydrologic connection from the on-site wetlands to the neighboring ditch and/or canal through the berms. If ACOE does claim jurisdiction permitting and mitigation through ACOE will also be necessary. Mitigation: Based on communications with the SFWMD staff, there is only one mitigation bank located within the same drainage basin as the project location. That bank is Panther Island Mitigation Bank. The current cost for these mitigation credits is $90,000 per UMAM credit (UMAM is Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method). Based on the below-average quality of the on-site wetland area, we estimate that a total of 0.4 to 0.6 credits per acre may be required to mitigate future impacts to the wetland on the subject property. This would result in the estimated cost for mitigation being in the range of $36,000 - $54,000 per acre of proposed wetland impact. There are other mitigation banks with service areas covering the project area, but in order to use “out-of-basin” bank credits an additional cumulative impact analysis must be performed before the SFWMD will accept mitigation from those banks. UES suggests staying “in-basin” by using the Panther Island MB. Please see the attached Wetland Assessment Map, soils survey map, and National Wetlands Inventory map for reference. Thank you very much for allowing us to assist in this project. Please contact me with any questions. Enclosures: Wetland Assessment/ Aerial Map National Wetlands Inventory Map NRCS Soil Survey Data/Map N.F. AS SHOWN WETLAND ASSESSMENT MAP 0 SCALE (FT.) 200 - UPLANDS (3.16 acres) LEGEND AERIAL PHOTO SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH FIGURE 1 12 - 8 - 17 0140.1700455.0000 WETLAND ASSESSMENT PROPOSED MEMORY CARE COTTAGES OF NAPLES 5867 WHITAKER ROAD NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 17-0583-01D.W. - WETLANDS (5.58 acres) National Wetlands InventoryU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team,wetlands_team@fws.govWetlandsEstuarine and Marine DeepwaterEstuarine and Marine WetlandFreshwater Emergent WetlandFreshwater Forested/Shrub WetlandFreshwater PondLakeOtherRiverineDecember 15, 201700.10.20.05 mi0 0.15 0.30.075 km1:5,793This page was produced by the NWI mapperNational Wetlands Inventory (NWI)This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. 6RLO0DS²&ROOLHU&RXQW\$UHD)ORULGD1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV&RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFH:HE6RLO6XUYH\1DWLRQDO&RRSHUDWLYH6RLO6XUYH\3DJHRI 26° 7' 19'' N81° 43' 16'' W26° 7' 19'' N81° 43' 3'' W26° 7' 12'' N81° 43' 16'' W26° 7' 12'' N81° 43' 3'' WNMap projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 Feet MetersMap Scale: 1:1,620 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.Soil Map may not be valid at this scale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²)HE7KHRUWKRSKRWRRURWKHUEDVHPDSRQZKLFKWKHVRLOOLQHVZHUHFRPSLOHGDQGGLJLWL]HGSUREDEO\GLIIHUVIURPWKHEDFNJURXQGLPDJHU\GLVSOD\HGRQWKHVHPDSV$VDUHVXOWVRPHPLQRUVKLIWLQJRIPDSXQLWERXQGDULHVPD\EHHYLGHQW6RLO0DS²&ROOLHU&RXQW\$UHD)ORULGD1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV&RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFH:HE6RLO6XUYH\1DWLRQDO&RRSHUDWLYH6RLO6XUYH\3DJHRI 0DS8QLW/HJHQG0DS8QLW6\PERO 0DS8QLW1DPH $FUHVLQ$2, 3HUFHQWRI$2, 0DODEDUILQHVDQGWRSHUFHQWVORSHV +DOODQGDOHILQHVDQGWRSHUFHQWVORSHV 3LQHGDILQHVDQGOLPHVWRQHVXEVWUDWXPWRSHUFHQWVORSHV 2OGVPDUILQHVDQGWRSHUFHQWVORSHV 7RWDOVIRU$UHDRI,QWHUHVW 6RLO0DS²&ROOLHU&RXQW\$UHD)ORULGD1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV&RQVHUYDWLRQ6HUYLFH:HE6RLO6XUYH\1DWLRQDO&RRSHUDWLYH6RLO6XUYH\3DJHRI 174182411814120500411-E1624-E2624-E3624-E34119411/743411-E1624-E2321411-E1LegendYouth HavenFLUCCS MAPPING120, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL174, MEDICAL FACILITY (EXISTING)182, GOLF COURSE321, PALMETTO411, PINE FLATWOODS411-E1, PINE FLATWOODS (0-25% EXOTICS)411/743, PINE FLATWOODS ON SPOIL4119, DISTURBED PINE FLATWOODS500, BORROW POND624-E2, PINE-CYPRESS-CABBAGE PALM (25-50% EXOTICS)624-E3, PINE-CYPRESS-CABBAGE PALM (50-75% EXOTICS)814, ROADWAY.0 300FeetYOUTH HAVENFLUCCS MAPPINGDAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC.3530 KRAFT ROAD, SUITE 301 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105PHONE (239) 434-6060 FAX (239) 434-6084COMPANY ID. NO. 00009496WHITAKER ROAD200 Foot Offset of Boundary 624 411 411 N.F. AS SHOWN EXISTING LAND USE MAP / 2017 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 0 SCALE (FT.) 200 411 - PINE FLATWOODS [0-25% EXOTICS] ( 4.02 ac / 42%) FLUCCS LEGEND AERIAL PHOTO SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH FIGURE 2A D.W. 624 - PINE, CYPRESS, CABBAGE PALM [>50% EXOTICS] ( 5.77 ac / 58%) 6 - 22 - 18 0140.1700455.000117-0583-02SWFWMD ERP PERMITTING MEMORY CARE COTTAGES 5867 WHITAKER ROAD NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 624 411 411 1742 N.F. AS SHOWN PROPOSED LAND USE MAP / 2017 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 0 SCALE (FT.) 200 411 - PINE FLATWOODS [0-25% EXOTICS] ( 0.46 ac / 5%) FLUCCS LEGEND AERIAL PHOTO SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH FIGURE 2B D.W. 624 - PINE, CYPRESS, CABBAGE PALM [>50% EXOTICS] ( 1.06 ac / 11%) 7 - 5 - 18 0140.1700455.000117-0583-02SWFWMD ERP PERMITTING MEMORY CARE COTTAGES 5867 WHITAKER ROAD NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1742 - ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY ( 8.27 ac / 84%) Traffic Impact Statement Youth Haven Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) Collier County, FL 04/24/2018 Prepared for: Prepared by: Pigeon – Roberts & Assoc., LLC 925 SE 17th Street, Suite A Ocala, FL 34471 Phone: 352-861-7799 Email: Cpigeon@pigeon-roberts.com Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee – $500.00 Collier County Transportation Review Fee – Small Scale Study – No Fee Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 2 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 3 Table of Contents Project Description ......................................................................................................................... 4 Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................... 6 Trip Distribution and Assignment ................................................................................................... 8 Background Traffic ........................................................................................................................ 11 Existing and Future Roadway Network ......................................................................................... 12 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network-Link Analysis ............................................................ 12 Improvement Analysis .................................................................................................................. 14 Mitigation of Impact ..................................................................................................................... 14 Appendices Appendix A: Development Master Plan ....................................................................................... 15 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) .................................................. 19 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition ........................................................ 26 Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 4 Project Description The Youth Haven project is an existing approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 1989–12, as may be amended. The subject parcel has a total gross area of approximately 24 acres. The project site is located on the south side of Whitaker Road, approximately ¾ mile east of County Barn Road, in Section 17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County. Refer to Fig. 1 – Project Location Map, which follows, and Appendix A: Development Master Plan. Fig. 1 – Project Location Map The Collier County approved PUD ordinance currently allows the 24 acre site to be developed with a maximum density of 10 children per acre plus staff adults as necessary or required by law. The aforementioned PUD was approved for Group Care Facilities and any other use which is comparable in nature. Currently, the Youth Haven development consists of 69 beds providing dormitory and supporting facilities for live-in youths. Consistent with the approved Youth Haven Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) prepared by Davidson Engineering, Inc., dated March 1, 2016, the traffic Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 5 generation associated with the Youth Haven development utilizes the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Land Use Code (LUC) 254 – Assisted Living. The PUD Amendment (PUDA) application requests a 1 acre parcel located between the Youth Haven PUD site and Santa Barbara Boulevard to be added to the PUD area. This parcel is currently zoned Residential Multi–Family (RMF)–6(3) District. The PUDA request is to change its zoning from RMF-6(3) to PUD. The addition would increase the PUD area to 25 acres. The PUDA requests to change the density to allow a maximum of 250 individuals consisting of both children and senior adult memory care individuals to be housed in group care facilities. The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project’s proposed trip generation. For the purpose of this report, the ITE LUC 254 – Assisted Living is utilized as a representative trip generator for both children and senior adult memory care individuals. The ancillary uses commonly associated with group care facilities (such as administrative office space, monitored supervision for some residents, etc.) are considered passive incidental to the proposed residential land use and are not included in the trip generation analysis. For the purposes of this evaluation, the project build-out year is assumed to be consistent with the Collier County 2023 planning horizon. The development program is illustrated in Table 1. Table 1 Development Program Development ITE Land Use ITE Land Use Code Total Size Zoning Allowed(1) Assisted Living 254 240 beds Single-Family Detached Housing 210 3 dwelling units Proposed PUDA Assisted Living 254 250 beds Note(s): (1) Approved PUD 24 ac – 240 beds; additional 1 ac parcel RMF – 6(3) allows up to 3 single family dwelling units. A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on March 22, 2017, via email – refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting). For the purposes of this zoning application, no changes to the previously approved accesses per Collier County Ordinance No. 1989–12 are requested. Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 6 Trip Generation The project’s site trip generation is based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, and the software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, most current version). The ITE rates and equations are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE – OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition. Based on ITE User’s Guide and Handbook recommendations and Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, no reductions for internal capture or pass-by trips have been taken into consideration. In order to provide the most intense trip generation for the proposed PUDA project, the “occupied beds” variable is chosen for the ITE LUC 254 – Assisted Living. The estimated trip generation associated with the proposed PUDA development scenario is illustrated in Table 2A. Table 2A Trip Generation - (Proposed PUDA Conditions) — Average Weekday Proposed PUDA 24 Hour Two- Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Assisted Living 250 ob(1) 1,035 31 14 45 36 36 72 Note(s): (1) ob = occupied beds variable for ITE LUC 254. The trip generation analysis based on approved zoning conditions is shown in Table 2B. Table 2B Trip Generation - (Zoning Allowed Conditions) — Average Weekday Zoning Allowed 24 Hour Two- Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Assisted Living 240 ob(1) 994 29 14 43 35 35 70 Single-Family Detached Housing 3 du(2) 28 1 1 2 2 1 3 Total 1,022 30 15 45 37 36 73 Note(s): (1) ob = occupied beds variable for ITE LUC 254; (2) du = dwelling unit variable for ITE LUC 210. Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 7 The trip generation associated with the PUD developed conditions is illustrated in Table 2C. Table 2C Trip Generation - (Existing Developed Conditions) — Average Weekday Existing Developed 24 Hour Two- Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Assisted Living 69 ob(1) 286 8 4 12 10 10 20 Note(s): (1) ob = occupied beds variable for ITE LUC 254. Zoning Planning Analysis For planning purposes, a traffic impact comparison is provided between the proposed PUD development versus the existing allowed PUD scenario, as illustrated in Table 2D (the difference between Table 2A and Table 2B). Table 2D Trip Generation (Net New Traffic - Zoning) – Average Weekday From a traffic standpoint and for planning purposes, based on the net new traffic peak hour results illustrated in Table 2D, the proposed PUDA development is less intensive when compared to the zoning allowed development scenario. In addition, the development shall be limited to 72 two-way unadjusted PM weekday peak hour trips, allowing for unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the most current ITE Trip Generation Manual shall be utilized for traffic generation purposes. Development 24 Hour Two- Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Proposed PUDA 1,035 31 14 45 36 36 72 Zoning Allowed 1,022 30 15 45 37 36 73 Net New Traffic Net Increase /(Net Decrease) 13 1 (1) (0) (1) 0 (1) Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 8 Transportation Concurrency Analysis In agreement with the Collier County TIS guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for adjacent roadway network is PM. For concurrency analysis purposes,, the potential project’s traffic impact is analyzed based on estimated PM peak hour net new traffic between the proposed PUD development versus the existing developed PUD scenario, as illustrated in Table 2E (the difference between Table 2A and Table 2C). Table 2E Trip Generation (Net New Traffic – Concurrency) – Average Weekday Trip Distribution and Assignment The projected net new traffic generated by the proposed PUDA project is empirically assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area and as coordinated during the methodology meeting with Collier County staff. The site-generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour and is graphically depicted in Fig. 2 – Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour. Development PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Proposed PUDA 36 36 72 Existing PUD Developed 10 10 20 Estimated New Net Traffic Net Increase /(Net Decrease) 26 26 52 Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 9 Table 3 – Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour* Roadway Link Collier County Link No. Roadway Link Location Distribution of Project Traffic PM Peak Hr Project Vol. Enter Exit Whitaker Rd.** N/A Project to Santa Barbara Blvd. 60% WB – 16 EB – 16 Whitaker Rd.** N/A Project Entrance West to County Barn Rd. 40% EB – 10 WB – 10 Santa Barbara Blvd. 79.0 North of Whitaker Rd. to Davis Blvd. 30% SB – 8 NB – 8 Santa Barbara Blvd. 79.0 South of Whitaker Rd. to Polly Ave 30% NB – 8 SB – 8 County Barn Rd. 10.0 North of Whitaker Rd. 20% SB – 5 NB – 5 County Barn Rd. 10.0 South of Whitaker Rd. 20% NB – 5 SB – 5 Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. **Not a Collier County monitored roadway. Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 10 Fig. 2 – Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 11 Background Traffic Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate from peak hour peak direction volume (estimated from 2008 through 2017), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2017 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the build-out year 2023. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2017 - 2023) Roadway Link CC AUIR Link ID # Roadway Link Location 2017 AUIR Pk Hr, Pk Dir Background Traffic Volume (trips/hr) Projected Traffic Annual Growth Rate (%/yr)* Growth Factor 2023 Projected Pk Hr, Peak Dir Background Traffic Volume w/out Project (trips/hr) Growth Factor** Trip Bank 2023 Projected Pk Hr, Peak Dir Background Traffic Volume w/out Project (trips/hr) Trip Bank*** Santa Barbara Blvd. 79.0 North of Whitaker Rd. to Davis Blvd. 890 4.0% 1.2653 1,127 112 1,002 Santa Barbara Blvd. 79.0 South of Whitaker Rd. to Polly Ave 890 4.0% 1.2653 1,127 113 1,002 County Barn Rd. 10.0 North of Whitaker Rd. to Davis Blvd. 326 2.0% 1.1262 368 65 391 County Barn Rd. 10.0 South of Whitaker Rd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 326 2.0% 1.1262 368 65 391 Note(s): * Annual Growth Rate - from 2017 AUIR, 2% minimum. ** Growth Factor = (1+Annual Growth Rate) 6. 2023 Projected Volume= 2017 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. *** 2023 Projected Volume= 2017 AUIR Volume + Trip Bank. The projected 2023 Peak Hour – Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 12 Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) and the project roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5- Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County 2017 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build-out. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Roadway Link CC AUIR Link ID # Roadway Link Location Exist Roadway Min. Standard LOS Exist Peak Dir, Peak Hr Capacity Volume Future Project Build out Roadway Santa Barbara Blvd. 79.0 North of Whitaker Rd. to Davis Blvd. 6D E 3,100 (SB) 6D Santa Barbara Blvd. 79.0 South of Whitaker Rd. to Polly Ave 6D E 3,100 (SB) 6D County Barn Rd. 10.0 North of Whitaker Rd. to Davis Blvd. 2U D 900 (SB) 2U County Barn Rd. 10.0 South of Whitaker Rd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 2U D 900 (SB) 2U Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D =4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network-Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future year 2023. The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 13 directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the roadway network closest to the project. All analyzed roadway links are projected to operate above the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2023 future build-out conditions. As illustrated in Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Chapter 6.02.02 – M.2., once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segment using Collier County TIS criterion, the development’s impact is not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments. Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) – With Project in the Year 2023 Roadway Link CC AUIR Link ID # Roadway Link Location 2017 Peak Dir, Peak Hr Capacity Volume Roadway Link, Peak Dir, Peak Hr (Project Vol Added)* 2023 Peak Dir, Peak Hr Volume w/Project ** % Vol Capacity Impact by Project Min LOS exceeded without Project? Yes/No Min LOS exceeded with Project? Yes/No Santa Barbara Blvd. 79.0 North of Whitaker Rd. to Davis Blvd. 3,100 (S) SB – 8 1,135 0.3% No No Santa Barbara Blvd. 79.0 South of Whitaker Rd. to Polly Ave 3,100 (S) SB – 8 1,135 0.3% No No County Barn Rd. 10.0 North of Whitaker Rd. to Davis Blvd. 900 (S) SB – 5 396 0.6% No No County Barn Rd. 10.0 South of Whitaker Rd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 900 (S) SB – 5 396 0.6% No No Note(s): * Refer to Table 3 from this report. ** 2023 Projected Volume= 2023 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added. Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 14 Improvement Analysis Based on the concurrency analysis results, the proposed project is not a significant or adverse traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development generated trips without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Based on the results of this analysis, the development shall be limited to 72 unadjusted two- way PM weekday peak hour trips at PUDA buildout conditions. For the purposes of this zoning application, no changes to the previously approved accesses are requested. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points – turn lane requirements will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available, as applicable. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project. Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 15 Appendix A: Development Master Plan Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 16 PUD Approved Master Plan Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 17 Proposed Additional Parcel Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 18 Proposed PUDA Master Plan Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 19 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 20 Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 21 Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 22 Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 23 Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 24 Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 25 Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 26 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 27 Approved PUD Development – Allowed Density Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 28 Proposed PUDA Development Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 29 PUD Existing Developed Youth Haven – PUDA – TIS – April 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 30 Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 1 COLLIER COUNTY WAIVER APPLICATION FROM THE REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED: _______________ PLANNER: PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE WAIVER: _____________________ (To Be Completed By Zoning and Land Development Review Staff) PROJECT NAME: Youth Haven PUD LOCATION: (Common Description) The subject property is located on South side of Whitaker Rd. approx., ¾ mile east of County Barn Road. ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: The Youth Haven PUD property is approximately 24± acres, which is partially developed with group housing uses for children. The proposed amendment will add an approximate 1 acre parcel to the PUD. The Archaeological Probability Map #6, shows the project is located in an area that does not indicate areas of Historical/Archaeological probability or known sites. The project is located in Section 17, Township 50 S, Range 26 E on the east side of County Barn Road. (Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator County Manager or designee to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 2 SECTION ONE: APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DATA A. Name of applicant (s) (if other than property owner, state relationship such as option holder, contract purchaser, lessee, trustee, etc.): Taft Budget LLC Mailing Address: 825 S. Taft, Mason City, Iowa, 50401 Phone: 641-424-3330 FAX: _______________________ E-Mail: Corey.projects@gmail.com B. Name of agent(s) for applicant, if any: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Mailing Address: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Phone: 239.947.1144 FAX: 239.947.0375 E-Mail: warnold@gradyminor.com C. Name of owner(s) of property: Please see “Property Owner List” Mailing Address: _____________________________________________________ Phone: ( ) _____________________________ FAX: ___________________ E-Mail: _____________________________________________________________ Note: If names in answers to A and/or B are different than name in C, notarized letter(s) of authorization from property owner (C) must be attached. SECTION TWO: SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA (Attach copy of the plat book page (obtainable from Clerk’s Office at the original scale) with subject property clearly marked.) A. Legal description of subject property. Answer only 1 or 2, as applicable. 1. Within platted subdivision, recorded in official Plat Books of Collier County. Subdivision Name: Plat Book Page Unit Tract Lot Section 09 Township 50S Range 26 E 2. If not in platted subdivision, a complete legal description must be attached which is sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property on County maps or aerial photographs. The legal description must include the Section, Township and Range. If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 3 may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be submitted. B. Property dimensions: Area: __________________ square feet, or 25± acres Width along roadway: 1,665± feet (Whitaker Road) Depth: 635± feet C. Present use of property: Youth Group Care and undeveloped D. Present zoning classification: Youth Haven PUD and RMF-6(3) SECTION THREE: WAIVER CRITERIA Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been excavated. A. Waiver Request Justification. 1. Interpretation of Aerial Photograph Photo shows property developed with youth group care uses and undeveloped lands. 2. Historical Land Use Description: Group care and undeveloped. 3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: The site contains developed group care uses and vegetation. 4. Other: . B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 4 regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION FOUR: CERTIFICATION A. The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this application. Any time delays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal of inaccurate or incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant. B. All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record and shall be a permanent part of the file. C. All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently fold to fit into a legal size (8 ½” x 14”) folder. ______________________________ Signature of Applicant or Agent D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed Name of Applicant or Agent ===================================================================== -TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION- SECTION FIVE: NOTICE OF DECISION The County Manager or designee has made the following determination: Approved on: _____________ By:______________________________ Approved with Conditions on: ____________ By: _____________________________ (see attached) Denied on: _______________ By: ______________________________ (see attached) YOUTH HAVEN CREWS RD Whitaker RD Santa Barbara BLVDRoyal Wood BLVDShedden LNCobblestone LNDeauville CIRPolly AVE Everett ST C r a n b r o o k W A Y Amberly CIR Bloomfield CIRWOODMERE LAKE CIRSource: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community ´ Youth Haven PUD Location Map Text Proposed Addition 1+/- Acre 590 0 590295 Feet WHITAKER ROAD (PUBLIC 60' R/W)PRESERVEWATERMANAGEMENTWATERMANAGEMENTPUD BOUNDARYGROUP HOUSING(CHILDREN)DEVELOPMENTAREAGROUP HOUSING(CHILDREN)DEVELOPMENTAREAGROUP HOUSING(CHILDREN)DEVELOPMENTAREAZONED: RMF-6(3)USE: SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAYZONED: RMF-6(3)USE: UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIALZONED: RMF-6USE: UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIALZONED: RMF-6USE: UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIALZONED: ROYAL WOODS G&C CLUB PUDUSE: GOLF COURSE, ROYAL WOOD BLVD. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND RESIDENTIALZONED: ROYAL WOODS G&C CLUB PUDUSE: GOLF COURSE, ROYAL WOOD BLVD. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND RESIDENTIALROYAL WOOD BLVD.PUD BOUNDARY15' WIDE TYPE 'B'LANDSCAPE BUFFER15' WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPEBUFFER20' WIDETYPE 'D'LANDSCAPEBUFFER20' WIDE TYPE 'D'LANDSCAPE BUFFER20' WIDE TYPE 'D'LANDSCAPE BUFFERGROUP HOUSING(CHILDREN)DEVELOPMENTAREAGROUP HOUSING(CHILDREN)DEVELOPMENTAREALEGENDPRESERVEWATER MANAGEMENTINTERNAL DRIVESGROUP HOUSING(CHILDREN/ADULT)DEVELOPMENT AREAGROUP HOUSING(CHILDREN/ADULT)DEVELOPMENT AREAGradyMinorCivil Engineers●Land Surveyors●Planners●Landscape ArchitectsCert. of Auth. EB 0005151Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151Business LC 26000266Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A.3800 Via Del ReyBonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144www.GradyMinor.com Fort Myers: 239.690.43800200'100'SCALE: 1" = 200'WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 www.GradyMinor.com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 NOTES 1.THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2.PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTIONS 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A TYPE 'B' BUFFER, A MINIMUM 6-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL WHICH SHALL BE ADDED OUTSIDE OF THE PRESERVE TO ACHIEVE THE OPACITY REQUIREMENT. SITE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 25± ACRE MAXIMUM DENSITY:250 CHILDREN/SENIORS, PLUS STAFF (10 BEDS/AC X 25 ACRES) PRESERVE: REQUIRED:2.34± ACRES 2.18± ACRES (14.54± ACRES X 0.15, PER SDP-AR-13286) 0.16± ACRES (1.07± ACRE ADDITION TO THE PUD X 0.15) PROVIDED:2.36± ACRES OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED:7.5± ACRES (25± ACRES X 0.30) PROVIDED:7.5± ACRES Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com June 21, 2018 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM); PUDZ-PL20180000646, Youth Haven Planned Unit Development (PUD) Dear Property Owner: You are invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., representing Taft Budget, LLC (Applicant) on: Wednesday, July 11, 2018, 5:30 pm at Shepherd of the Glades Lutheran Church, Fellowship Hall, 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd, Naples, FL 34113 Taft Budget, LLC has submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of a PUD Rezone. This application proposes to amend the previously approved 24± acre Youth Haven PUD (Ordinance 89- 12) to add an approximate 1-acre RMF-6 (3) zoned parcel. The Youth Haven PUD, is a partially developed 24+/- acre institutional project, which permits group housing uses for children. The PUD will be modified to permit group housing for children and senior adults. A revised master plan is proposed to identify the areas within the PUD for youth and senior group housing. The maximum intensity currently permitted is 240 group-housing beds, which is based on a maximum of 10 beds per acre. With the addition of the 1 - acre parcel the new PUD acreage will be 25+/- acres; therefore, the PUD could permit up to 250 group- housing beds. The subject property (Youth Haven PUD) is comprised of approximately 25± acres, located on the south side of Whitaker Road, immediately west of Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 17, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail to: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134. Sincerely, Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician Project Location Map PL20180000646 500' 5/10/2018 Page1 of 4 NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 LEGAL 1150 22ND LLC 6010 WESTBOROUGH DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 8 50 26 E1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4, LESS THE N 30 FT THEREOF AS RESERVED FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES,AND 171191 CANADA INC ATTN ANNE & KEITH HARRIS 21 AMETHYST CRES STITTSVILLE, ON CANADA K2S 1Z1 16 50 26 W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4, W1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4, LESS R/W, LESS THOSE PORTIONS AS DESC BY A M & W F SMMONS TRUST 809 LAYOLA DR LITTLE ROCK, AR 22211---0000 16 50 26 W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 & E1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 LESS R/W, AND THOSE PORTIONS AS DESC IN ADEMA, HENRY & RUTH L 3665 AMBERLY CIR APT B205 NAPLES, FL 34112---2802 17 50 26 SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS N 30FT ALLEN, TERRY L ELIZABETH A BERNARDO 70 MORRIS COVE RD NEW HAVEN, CT 06512---0000 17 50 26 W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS S 30 FT ALLEN, THERESA M & DARRYL S 130 PROSPECT ST VERNON, CT 06066---3136 17 50 26 NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS S 30FT R/W 9.55 AC OR 1353 PG 1999 ALLGOOD, SHIRLEY J 3695 AMBERLY CIR APT E108 NAPLES, FL 34112---2822 17 50 26 NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE 1/4, LESS R/W 9.55 AC AMBERLY CIRCLE LAND TRUST 3675 AMBERLY CIRCLE UNIT C 205 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 17 50 26 E1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS N 30FT R/W 4.77 AC; LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN ORDER OF TAKING FOR AMBERLY VILLAGE COMMONS ASSOC C/O SPRINGS PROP MANAGEMENT 5033 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34113---4126 17 50 26 SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4, W1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, W1/2 OF E1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS ANDERSON, JOHN F & KAREN A 15 PARLIAMENT LANE WOBURN, MA 01801---0000 17 50 26 PROPOSED CRANBROOK COLONY COMPLEX DESC IN OR 1396 PG 666, LESS CRANBROOK COLONY I CONDO AS DESC IN OR 1486 PG ANDERSON, LINDA 3695 AMBERLY CIR #E-205 NAPLES, FL 34112---2823 17 50 26 PAR 56.1 NKA CRANBROOK COLONY 1 (CONDO) AS RECD IN OR 1486 PG 261 ANDREW, STEPHEN J & MARYANNE L 16 WADSWORTH RD ARLINGTON, MA 02476---7038 17 50 26 PAR 56.2 NKA CRANBROOK COLONY II CONDO AS REC'D IN OR 1489 PG 1513 ARNDT, JOHN A & ROSANNE B 2023 WRIGHTSVILLE BLVD KILL DEVIL HILLS, NC 27948---8353 17 50 26 NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE 1/4 LESS S 30FT AXEL GRABOWSKI NON R/L TRUST 1527 AERIE DRIVE PARK CITY, UT 84060---0000 17 50 26 W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS THE N 30 FT THEREOF BAUER, ERWIN G & ELIZABETH A 3695 AMBERLY CIR #E208 NAPLES, FL 34112---2823 17 50 26 E1/2 OF E1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/2 OF NE1/4, LESS THE N 30FT THEREOF BAYER, GREGORY J CHRISTOPHER W BAYER 315 TITUSVILLE RD POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12603---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-101 BEDNAR, ALAN J & PATRICIA O 3535 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-102 BEDNAR, BRETT 3685 AMBERLY CIRCLE #D-103 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-103 BLAISING, PATRIC H & ANNE E 3645 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-104 BONAMASE, EDWARD J & SHIRLEY A 5940 CRANBROOK WAY #A201 NAPLES, FL 34112---8867 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-105 BONTATIBUS JR, MICHAEL FRANCES N BONTATIBUS 3685 AMBERLY CIR APT D104 NAPLES, FL 34112---2817 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-106 BORIEO, KENNETH L KAREN J BORIEO TR K J BORIEO TRUST UTD 02/23/00 3685 AMBERLY CIR APT D304 NAPLES, FL 34112---2820 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-107 BOTTONE JR, MATHEW & SUSAN R 5940 CRANBROOK WAY A-203 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-108 BROWN, CAROLE E 3655 AMBERLY CIR APT A307 NAPLES, FL 34112---8899 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-201 BUHL, DENNIS W & RUTH C 5908 CRANBROOK WAY #I103 NAPLES, FL 34112---2806 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-202 BUKSA, GAIL 792 COLUMBUS AVENUE APT 16E NEW YORK, NY 10025---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-203 BUNKER, JUANITA 5908 CRANBROOK WAY # I- 206 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-204 BUTORAC, JOHN & JANE M 3457 COBBLESTONE LANE CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH 44223---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-205 CAGGIANO, GEORGE M & BEVERLY A 20 CENTERBOARD LN SOUTH YARMOUTH, MA 02664---1004 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-206 CALNIN, JOHN J YVONNE M CALNIN DEBRA A CALNIN 104 W PARK RIDGE AVE APPLETON, WI 54911---1119 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-207 CAROL J CHARETTE FRAZIER TRUST C/O ROBERT CHARETTE 6 FULLER DR NORTON, MA 02766---2568 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-208 CARTER, NORMAN & ROSALIE 3705 AMBERLY CIR APT F104 NAPLES, FL 34112---2825 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-301 CASSIERE, ANNETTE 13531 MARJAC WAY MC CORDSVILLE, IN 46055---9665 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-302 CAVALLONE, VINCENT J & MARYANN 1208 BOULEVARD SEASIDE PARK, NJ 08752---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-303 CAVANAGH, RODERICK A J ELIZABETH A CAVANAGH 5912 CRANBROOK WAY #H202 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-304 CHASE, WILLIAM G & JOAN P 81 WAVERLEY AVE WATERTOWN, MA 02472---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-305 CLAPP, STEVEN L & NANCY M 5916 CRANBROOK WAY G104 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-306 COCHRAN, JERRY E & JUDITH C 3655 AMBERLY CIRCLE #A-205 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-307 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM A-308 CONNOLLY FOLEY FAM REV TRUST 34 COVINGTON ST BOSTON, MA 02127---2935 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-102 CONTI, GERARD & COLLEEN B 18842 NW 24TH PLACE PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33029---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-103 COSGROVE TR, JOHN F PATRYCE M COSGROVE TR JOHN F COSGROVE REV TRUST PATRYCE M COSGROVE REV TRUST 9 WOODRIDGE RD MERRIMACK, NH 03054---2605 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-105 COSTA, LORI J 3695 AMBERLY CIR #E105 NAPLES, FL 34112---2831 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-106 CRANBROOK COLONY COMMONS ASSOC C/O BICKNELL PROPERTY MGMT 2375 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 206 NAPLES, FL 34103---4439 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-107 CURRAN, LINDA L 825 11TH AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102---8202 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-108 D A MCCALLISTER REV TRUST 4372 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---8827 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-201 DABNEY, CHARLES & MONICA 6383 SW 38TH ST MIAMI, FL 33155---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-202 DAMIANO, FRANK & GERALDINE 5920 CRANBROOK WAY # F-101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-203 DANS, MARTINE & DANIEL MARBELLA MONTANA NO 11 29602 MARBELLA MALAGA SPAIN AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-204 DARDANO, JULIE A 44 PRINCE STREET UNIT 309 BOSTON, MA 02113---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-205 DAVIS, ROBERT B & CAMELLA M 15 COLE DRIVE HOPKINTON, MA 01748---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-206 DAVIS, ROBERT KEVIN ALYSON RENEE DAVIS 3 QUAIL RUN CHARLESTON, IL 61920---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-207 DEARDEN, GEORGE LILLIAN DEARDEN 5928 CRANBROOK WAY #D101 NAPLES, FL 34112---8868 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-208 DEARDEN, JENNIFER L BRIAN A ROONEY 21 GRAND HILL DR DOVER, MA 02030---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-301 DELEA JR, WILLIAM D PRISCILLA J DELEA 40 FREEMAN WAY EASTHAM, MA 02642---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-302 DIPAOLO TR, PAUL & ANNETTE DIPAOLO FAMILY TRUST UTD 12/23/02 3601 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---8838 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-303 DONALD S MOLENDA FAMILY TRUST 5932 CRANBROOK WAY APT C104 NAPLES, FL 34112---8870 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-304 DONOVAN, MARY ELIZABETH 217 13 ROCKAWAY POINT BLVD BREEZY POINT, NY 11697---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-305 DOROTHY M ALLARD REV TRUST 5924 CRANBROOK WAY #E201 NAPLES, FL 34112---8895 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-306 DRENNER, EILEEN K PAMELA N SCALETTA TRACY A SMITH 12701 39TH AVE PLEASANT PRAIRIE, WI 53158---4203 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-307 DYNDA, FRANK L & PATRICIA B 227 KIRTLAND DR NAPLES, FL 34110---1347 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM B-308 EDWARDS JR, FOREST M CYNTHIA S EDWARDS 120 TREETOPS LANE LAKE LURE, NC 28746---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-101 EDWARDS, WILLIAM J & PAMELA J 3655 AMBERLY CIR #A104 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-102 ELBA DEVELOPMENT CORP 600 5TH AVE S STE 207 NAPLES, FL 34102---6642 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-103 ELIZABETH A FOSTER REV TRUST 3655 AMBERLY CIR # A302 NAPLES, FL 34112---8898 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-104 ELSIE KRALIK REVOCABLE TRUST 5940 CRANBROOK WAY #A105 NAPLES, FL 34112---8866 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-105 EMMOTT, GEORGE A & CAROLE M 3685 AMBERLY CIR APT D208 NAPLES, FL 34112---2819 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-106 FAIR ACKER, KAY 5916 CRANBROOK WAY #G105 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-107 FALCONE, NICHOLAS M JOSEPHINE M FALCONE 10 IMPERIAL DR NORWALK, CT 06854---1305 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-108 FASANO, VINCENT P & MARY H 5940 CRANBROOK WAY #A204 NAPLES, FL 34112---8867 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-201 FAY, CHRISTOPHER W CATHERINE C FAY 81 LONG LN NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI 02852---4605 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-202 FITZPATRICK THOMAS J & MARY A 3711 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---8840 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-203 FITZS REALTY LTD 48 FIELDING AVENUE DARTMOUTH, NS CANADA B3B 1E4 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-204 FLEMING, RUSSELL J & MARIAN K 550 PLEASANT ST STE 408 WINTHROP, MA 02152---2731 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-205 FONTAINE, ROBERT J & AINO H 202-1630 PARIS ST SUDBURY, ON CANADA P3E 3C1 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-206 FRANCE, CHARLES B 5904 CRANBROOK WAY #J203 NAPLES, FL 34112---2805 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-207 FRANCISCO, LINDA 789 NATICK AVE CRANSTON, RI 02921---1044 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-208 FRONTERO FAMILY TRUST 5928 CRANBROOK WAY #D202 NAPLES, FL 34112---8869 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-301 GALLAGHER, KAREN M 14701 DETROIT AVE #555 LAKEWOOD, OH 44107---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-302 GAMELLI SR, RICHARD J & JUDITH 5920 CRANBROOK WAY APT F205 NAPLES, FL 34112---8856 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-303 GILLESPIE EDWARD W & BARBARA A 17 DIX ST WINCHESTER, MA 01890---1802 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-304 GIOVANNANGELI, MARCIA 5920 CRANBROOK WAY APT F102 NAPLES, FL 34112---8826 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-305 GOREY, PAUL J PAUL J GOREY II 3733 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---8840 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-306 GROVES, STEVEN P PO BOX 9 YORK BEACH, ME 03910---0009 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-307 GROVES, STEVEN P & KATHY P 15 BEACON STREET PO BOX 9 YORK BEACH, ME 03910---0009 AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDOMINIUM C-308 GULFVIEW TOWNHOMES LLC 709 HEATHERY LN NAPLES, FL 34108---8514 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-101 GUSTAFSON, DONALD J PATRICIA M GUSTAFSON 195 POCAHONTAS DR WARWICK, RI 02888---5228 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-102 HABERMAN, SANDRA 3705 AMBERLY CIRCLE #F-203 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-103 PL20180000646 500' 5/10/2018 Page2 of 4 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34113---7753 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-106 HAGAN, JUDITH A 3685 AMBERLY CIR APT D305 NAPLES, FL 34112---2820 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-107 HAM, JAMES R 5932 CRANBROOK WAY # 101 NAPLES, FL 34112---2850 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-108 HAM, WILLIAM R & CHERYL A 5908 CRANBROOK WAY #I-105 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-201 HANCOCK ET AL, DALLAS & JOSEPH 6718 N GRAND FIR DR EDWARDS, IL 61528---9205 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-202 HASLER, KARL MARIA H KRAEHEMANN MARCO R HASLER 118 TORREY PINES PT NAPLES, FL 34113---7540 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-203 HAUBRICH JR, F WILLIAM SHERRY A HAUBRICH 25 WASHINGTON STREET CONCORD, NH 03301---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-204 HELFRICH JR, WILLIAM R PAMELA I HELFRICH 5928 CRANBROOK WAY #D-206 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-205 HERBST, CHARLES A & JOANN 3685 AMBERLY CIR APT D307 NAPLES, FL 34112---2820 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-206 HIGGINS, JOHN MITCHELL JEANETTE LOUISE HIGGINS 218 BRITTON TRL AURORA, ON CANADA L4G 7T1 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-207 HINES, ROBERT R & MARY A 5 GEORGE COURT MILLER PLACE, NY 11764---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-208 HODAPP, EILEEN J JOSEPH F HODAPP JR 2 WORCESTER CT FALMOUTH, MA 02540---3537 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-301 HOFMANN, ALFRED WILLIAM REBECCA ANN HOFMANN 1437 ANDREW AVE SALEM, OH 44446---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-302 HOLLINGER, KURT & MARY 10398 PLANK RD MILAN, MI 48160---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-303 HOLMES, JANET A 5924 CRANBROOK WAY # 203 NAPLES, FL 34112---2848 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-304 HOWES, NORMAN H & MARIE E 5912 CRANBROOK WAY #H104 NAPLES, FL 34112---8872 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-305 ISOPP, JOHANN PO BOX 397 STATION A TORONTO, ON CANADA M5W 1C2 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-306 ITEN, EDGAR JOSEF FRANZ LUEGETEN STRASSE 17A EINSIEDELN SWITZERLAND 8840 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-307 JACKSON, JOHN D & JANE R 46 JEFFERSON AVE WATERTOWN, MA 02472---3161 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM D-308 JACOBY, GEORGE F JOAN M JACOBY 5924 CRANBROOK WAY APT E206 NAPLES, FL 34112---8895 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-101 JAMES M KIRN REV TRUST 5924 CRANBROOK WAY APT E204 NAPLES, FL 34112---8895 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-102 JANDA, GEORGE LEROY MAUREEN F JANDA 7 HOLLIS STREET FAIRFIELD, CT 06824---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-103 JAUSSEN, DOLORES Z 5908 CRANBROOK WAY #I204 NAPLES, FL 34112---2807 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-104 JENNER, GEORGE E & CATHERINE L 2047 COMMONS CIRCLE DRIVE BATAVIA, OH 45103---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-105 JOHN A VIGILIO JR REV TRUST 3667 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-106 JOHNSON, FRANK 5928 CRANBROOK WAY APT D105 NAPLES, FL 34112---8868 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-107 JOHNSON, GALEN W & PAMELA J 6922 DONAHEY DR PANORA, IA 50216---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-108 JORDAN, JOHN D 3655 AMBERLY CIR APT A107 NAPLES, FL 34112---8897 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-201 JUSTINE A CARLSON TRUST 5792 DEAUVILLE CIR APT A204 NAPLES, FL 34112---7282 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-202 KELLEY, JAMES F & AMELIA C 3665 AMBERLY CIR APT B203 NAPLES, FL 34112---2801 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-203 KENNEDY, KURT D LINDA MAE MARTIN 3665 AMBERLY CIR #B101 NAPLES, FL 34112---2800 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-204 KENTON, JEFFREY M TIMOTHY B MAGUIRE 28 WAVERLY RD WOBURN, MA 01801---5852 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-205 KERIN L CRIMMINS REV TRUST 46 ROOSEVELT RD CUMBERLAND, RI 02864---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-206 KEYES, MARY JANE MARYBETH TURNER 3675 AMBERLY CIR #C201 NAPLES, FL 34112---2829 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-207 KINCH, THOMAS & JACQUELINE 76 SILVERBIRCH BLVD MOUNT HOPE, ON CANADA L0R 1W0 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-208 KMON, ROBERT V & JEAN W 5932 CRANBROOK WAY # 201 NAPLES, FL 34112---2850 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-301 KNIGHT, ROBERT L LORRAINE M KNIGHT 5916 CRANBROOK WAY G204 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-302 KOKOSZKA, PETER J & MARIANNE 3675 AMBERLY CIR APT C203 NAPLES, FL 34112---2809 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-303 KUJALA, RICHARD & LINDA 4647 RAVINEWOOD DRIVE COMMERCE TWNSHP, MI 48382---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-304 LANNI, ALBERT T & JANET M 40 BRAMBLE LN WEST WARWICK, RI 02893---5506 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-305 LANNING, SUSAN MARY FRANK ANTHONY LANNING III 7301 RAVENNA RD CONCORD, OH 44077---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-306 LANZA, JAMES & JILL 5912 CRANBROOK WAY H206 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-307 LATOUF, JOHN & SHERRY GATE TOWER #1 APT 2711 PO BOX 131876 ABU DHABI UNITED ARAB EMIR AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM E-308 LAURAINE B SUPINO FAM TRUST 410 SALEM STREET #1206 WAKEFIELD, MA 01880---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM F-101 LAURI, THOMAS & BENITA 6932 CRANBROOK WAY NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM F-102 LAURICELLA TR, ANTHONY CELESTE LAURICELLA TR UTD 10/28/99 ITF A,C LAURICELLA LIVING 5908 CRANBROOK WAY #I106 NAPLES, FL 34112---2806 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM F-103 LAURINO, FRANK & JOANNE 5904 CRANBROOK WAY J-106 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM F-104 LAVICKA, ALENA 5920 CRANBROOK WAY APT F106 NAPLES, FL 34112---8826 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM F-201 LEDUC, CARL L 3695 AMBERLY CIR APT E301 NAPLES, FL 34112---2823 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM F-202 LEE, JAMES A & LINDA J 11 KNOLL RD NORTH OAKS, MN 55127---6469 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM F-203 LEE, JOSEPH & JOANNE M 1000 CREEKSIDE DRIVE #606 DUNDAS, ON CANADA L9H 7S6 AMBERLY VILLAGE II A CONDOMINIUM F-204 LENNON, WILLIAM P & ELLEN M 25 LONGSHANK CIRCLE EAST FALMOUTH, MA 02536---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-101 LILLY, KENT D & KATHRYN C 5213 GIBBS RD PLAINFIELD, IN 46168---8392 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-102 LINCOLN, JOHN S & PATRICIA A HEATHER A NARY 293 ACAPESKET RD EAST FALMOUTH, MA 02536---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-103 LINDSAY, RICHARD & MARY 5908 CRANBROOK WAY #I-102 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-104 LOIS E RIOPELLE REV TRUST 5932 CRANBROOK WAY APT C102 NAPLES, FL 34112---8870 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-105 LOUISE M HOLZ TRUST 6572 MURANO DR WINDSOR, CO 80550---7072 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-106 LUDWIG, LLOYD B & MARY S 1212 MINI HILLS DR EFFINGHAM, IL 62401---4662 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-201 LUFFY, DONALD E DIANE L HAZARA 3685 AMBERLY CIR #D301 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-202 MACOMBER, EUGENE G MACOMBER, ANITA P 3557 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---8855 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-203 MAGUIRE, ANGELA J 201 HOLLY LN CEDAR GROVE, NJ 07009---3202 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-204 MAGUIRE, MICHAEL TARA ANNE FLYNN-MAGUIRE 212 HIGHPOINT CT LK HOPATCONG, NJ 07849---2438 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-205 MAHONEY, BARBARA L 1000 LELY PALMS DR #305D NAPLES, FL 34113---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG A-206 MARILLA A QUINN TRUST 28 CEDAR LANE ELKART LAKE, WI 53020---1960 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-101 MARINI, ALEX 68 MYRTLE ST EXT NORWALK, CT 06855---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-102 MARINI, EDWARD S JACQUELINE A MARINI 64 MYRTLE STREET EXT NORWALK, CT 06855---1444 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-103 MARJORIE A ROCHE LIVING TRUST 20 COLE DR NORWICH, NY 13815---1023 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-104 MARRY, RICHARD J 5908 CRANBROOK WAY #I202 NAPLES, FL 34112---2807 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-105 MARTIN BERG LIVING TRUST 1505 FOX GLEN DRIVE HARTSDALE, NY 10530---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-106 MATZLER, ASTRID GUIDO MATZLER % DIANE BRENNAN SUN REALTY 3757 TAMIAMI TRAIL N NAPLES, FL 34103---3718 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-201 MCCLUMPHA, DONALD STUART NEIL DOUGLAS MCCLUMPHA 5 THE PAVILION EYHURST PARK KINGSWOOD UNITED KINGDOM KT20 6JP CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-202 MCCLURG, RONALD E & JUSTINE 84 OAK TREE LN SE WARREN, OH 44484---5611 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-203 MCDERMOTT, CHARLES E DAWN MCDERMOTT PO BOX 12 MANSFIELD DEPOT MANSFIELD, CT 06251---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-204 MCEACHERN, KATHLEEN B 33 EVANS RD PEABODY, MA 01960---1801 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-205 MCKOWEN, VERNA JOANNE 5932 CRANBROOK WAY APT C106 NAPLES, FL 34112---8870 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG B-206 MEAD, BARRY G & JANICE M 45 LISA LANE MASHPEE, MA 02649---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-101 MEYER TR, ULRIKE A ERICK H MEYER MARTINA MEYER UTD 12/13/76 41555 GLOCA MORA ST HARRISON TWP, MI 48045---1450 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-102 MITCHELL, ROBERT & JUDITH 3675 AMBERLY CIR APT C108 NAPLES, FL 34112---2809 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-103 MOMBERG, JOHN V & RAE F 3675 AMBERLY CIR APT C107 NAPLES, FL 34112---2809 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-104 MONAGHAN, PHILIP B JOHANNA B MONAGHAN 137 SASSAMON AVE MILTON, MA 02186---5817 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-105 MONDO, THOMAS F & LINDA 18 ELEANOR DR MAHOPAC, NY 10541---3909 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-106 MORALES, ROBERT J MARJORIE V GRUSHEY 5928 CRANBROOK WAY APT D102 NAPLES, FL 34112---8868 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-201 MORGAN, ANDY 172 HICKORY RD NAPLES, FL 34108---3310 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-202 MORO, MAUREEN 33 WALDEN ST WINTHROP, MA 02152---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-203 MURPHY, KATHY CAHILL 1205 N GARFIELD ST APT 804 ARLINGTON, VA 22201---6806 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-204 N & S G RUGGIRELLO REV TRUST 1631 N CROOKED LAKE DRIVE LAKE, MI 48632---9580 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-205 NAPOLITANO, MICHAEL A 5924 CRANBROOK WAY APT E101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG H-206 NEELON, WILLIAM & DIANE 44 CABOT ST MILTON, MA 02186---4219 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-101 NEVILLE, WILLIAM L & NANCY L 3665 AMBERLY CIRCLE B-206 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-102 PL20180000646 500' 5/10/2018 Page3 of 4 NICALEK, KENNETH A & JANET L 340 BRIGHAM STREET NORTHBOROUGH, MA 01532---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-103 NISTICO, FRANK J 5936 CRANBROOK WAY #B202 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-104 NORMA R FARMILO TRUST 4036 KENT CT NAPLES, FL 34116---7310 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-105 NUGENT, TERRENCE & JOAN 15 LITTLE JOHN LN DANBURY, CT 06811---2816 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-106 O LEARY, RICHARD & KATHERINE 3685 AMBERLY CIR APT D302 NAPLES, FL 34112---2819 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-201 OBERMILLER, WAYNE L & SUZANNE 3489 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---8855 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-202 OHARA, ELENA ALVARENGA 5924 CRANBROOK WAY #E-104 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-203 OLUFSON, VERNE L & MARY F 5912 CRANBROOK WAY #H-106 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-204 OPPERMANN, JAMES A BEATRICE W OPPERMANN 2050 SAINT PETERS ROAD POTTSTOWN, PA 19465---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-205 ORGOVAN, GEORGE & BONNIE JEAN 5916 CRANBROOK WAY APT G205 NAPLES, FL 34112---8875 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG I-206 OXLEY, MARY A 5940 CRANBROOK WAY #A103 NAPLES, FL 34112---8866 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-101 OYSTRICK FAMILY TRUST 33 MISSION HILL SUDBURY, ON CANADA P3E 6M1 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-102 PALAZOLA, JOSEPH & MARY 40 TAFT AVE BEVERLY, MA 01915---3951 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-103 PALMER, EARL L & PAMELA 5904 CRANBROOK WAY #J104 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-104 PATRICK, ELIZABETH 3580 GULF HARBOR COURT BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-105 PATTERSON, WILLIAM J 27 KONDAZIAN STREET WATERTOWN, MA 02472---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-106 PEARSON, RICHARD A & MAUREEN E 3 BIRCH LANE P O BOX 392 SCITUATE, MA 02060---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-201 PICOTTE, ROBERT J & AMY L 3665 AMBERLY CIR #B 207 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-202 POEHLS TR, ANDRA J RALPH D POEHLS TR ANDRA J POEHLS REV TRUST UTD 03/24/99 4970 W 100 N BARGERSVILLE, IN 46106---9597 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-203 POTUSEK III, JOHN J & BARBARA 2B HERITAGE CRST SOUTHBURY, CT 06488---1367 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-204 POWERS, GERALD J 5908 CRANBROOK WAY #101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-205 POWERS, ROBIN L 3705 AMBERLY CIR F-101 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG J-206 PREMORE ET AL, SHIRLEY A 3675 AMBERLY CIR NAPLES, FL 34112---2829 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG C-101 PRENDERGAST, JOSEPH J MARGARET L PRENDERGAST 3 ESHER CT TOMS RIVER, NJ 08757---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG C-102 PRICE, RICHARD W & ANITA L 3579 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---8855 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG C-103 PROTO, DONALD G LAUREL C BROWN-PROTO 17 A RIVERVIEW AVE MASHPEE, MA 02649---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG C-104 PRUDENTE FAMILY TRUST 3695 AMBERLY CIR E204 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG C-105 PUCCINELLI, JAY & LISA 514 BALD KNOB ROAD JOHNSBURG, IL 60051---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG C-106 RACZKA, RICHARD RICHARD A RACZKA PO BOX 128 LLEWELLYN, PA 17944---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG C-201 RANALDI, JOSEPH & ARLENE 5912 CRANBROOK WAY #H201 NAPLES, FL 34112---8873 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG C-202 RAYMOND & YOLANDA FERN REV TRU 3623 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---8838 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG C-203 RAYMOND H HANLON LIV TRUST 3655 AMBERLY CIR # A304 NAPLES, FL 34112---8899 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG C-204 REILLY, ANNE M 3695 AMBERLY CIR APT E101 NAPLES, FL 34112---2821 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG D-103 REPSYS, JOHN & JEANNE 265 FAIRWAY CRESCENT TECUMSEH, ON CANADA N8N 2Y9 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG D-104 RICCARDO, PETER R & LUCILLE 2565 COLLIER RD MANASQUAN, NJ 08736---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG D-105 RIGUAL, MONIQUE ALINE 5936 CRANBROOK WAY #B101 NAPLES, FL 34112---8864 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG D-106 RIVARD, STEVEN D & KATHLEEN 232 KIRK TER NORTH DIGHTON, MA 02764---1106 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG D-201 ROBERT K ST FRANCIS REV TRUST 5912 CRANBROOK WAY #H203 NAPLES, FL 34112---8873 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG D-202 ROBERT W ANDERSEN LIV TRUST 5381 W JAMES ROAD CONNERSVILLE, IN 47331---8641 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG D-203 ROBERT W BARNARD REV TRUST 3675 AMBERLY CIR APT C301 NAPLES, FL 34112---2810 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG D-204 ROLFE, WILLIAM D & MARILYN A 11 TRUDY LN CHEEKTOWAGA, NY 14227---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG D-205 RONALD J CZAJKA LIV TRUST MARY CZAJKA LIV TRUST 1870 BUCKINGHAM AVENUE WESTCHESTER, IL 60154---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG D-206 ROONEY, DARRELL 3665 AMBERLY CIR #B-302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-101 RORKE'S DRIFT INV LTD 347 WALFORD RD E SUDBURY, ON CANADA P3E 2H1 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-102 ROYAL WOOD MASTER ASSOC INC 4300 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---8824 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-103 RYAN, THOMAS & BRIGID 3705 AMBERLY CIRCLE #F103 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-104 SALLY E GREENE LIV TRUST 5940 CRANBROOK WAY #A102 NAPLES, FL 34112---8866 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-105 SANDERS, FRANCIS P & ELAINE 3445 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---8855 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-106 SARRO, WILLIAM & THEA 3467 ROYAL WOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-201 SARRO, WILLIAM F & JENNIFER L 453 TURNPIKE ST APT 2 SOUTH EASTON, MA 02375---1734 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-202 SCHOLLE, AUDREY 5916 CRANBROOK WAY #G102 NAPLES, FL 34112---8874 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-203 SCIOLI, DAVID A & ANN A 5932 CRANBROOK WAY C-103 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-204 SHEA, PHILIP & GERTRUDE 44 MAIN ST APT 207 STONEHAM, MA 02180---3356 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-205 SHEW, RICHARD & LINDA 5940 CRANBROOK WAY #A106 NAPLES, FL 34112---8866 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG E-206 SHIRE FAMILY REV TRUST 8440 E BOGOTA PL TUCSON, AZ 85715---5205 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-101 SIMPSON SR, GERALD 3665 AMBERLY CIRCLE #B-107 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-102 SJOSTEDT, MARGARET M 5936 CRANBROOK WAY #B201 NAPLES, FL 34112---8865 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-103 SKINNER FLORIDA REALTY TRUST 5912 CRANBROOK WAY #H204 NAPLES, FL 34112---8873 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-104 SMITH, MARY BETH 3695 AMBERLY CIR E308 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-105 SMITH, RONALD ROSALYN SMITH 7160 EVENTRAIL DR POWELL, OH 43065---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-106 SNELL, JOYCE R 122 MIAMI LAKES DR MILFORD, OH 45150---5807 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-201 SPENCE, JAMES J & BETTY 23228 BEVERLY ST ST CLR SHORES, MI 48082---1115 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-202 SPLAINE, WILLIAM & CAROL A 632 WASHINGTON ST BRAINTREE, MA 02184---5727 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-203 SPRANO, GRACE 3665 AMBERLY CIR #B-103 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-204 SUZANNE STOHL LIVING TRUST 244 KNOLL COURT LAKE LURE, NC 28746---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-205 SZOLANSKY, FRANZ EUGEN MATZLER BAHNHOFSTRASSE 70 POSTFACH 1130 ZURICH SWITZERLAND 1130 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG F-206 TANNER LIVING TRUST 3695 AMBERLY CIRCLE #E-302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-101 TAYLOR SCOTT DAVIS REV TRUST PO BOX 429 BETTENDORF, IA 52722---0008 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-102 TAYLOR SR, WILLIAM G & MARIA S 3675 AMBERLY CIR APT C307 NAPLES, FL 34112---2811 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-103 THOMPSON, FREDERICK J 26 CHARLES ST DARTMOUTH, NS CANADA B3A 3W6 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-104 TIBBETTS, JUDE A 5924 CRANBROOK WAY APT E102 NAPLES, FL 34112---8894 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-105 TIMOTHY G LANE LIV TRUST LAURIE K LANE LIV TRUST 3951 ELK COURT ROCHESTER, MI 48306---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-106 TOOHER, MARK E 3665 AMBERLY CIR #B-105 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-201 TRIANTAFILLOU, EDWARD A MARIE E TRIANTAFILLOU 253 HULSETOWN RD CAMPBELL HALL, NY 10916---0000 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-202 UEBBING TR, JOSEPH B GERALDINE A UEBBING TR J B UEBBING TRUST G A UEBBING TRUST 3695 AMBERLY CIR APT E304 NAPLES, FL 34112---2824 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-203 VAN ABEELE, F RICHARD & JUDY K 5936 CRANBROOK WAY #B205 NAPLES, FL 34112---8865 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-204 VAN ABEELE, JOHN A 1451 N ROAD 750 W BARGERSVILLE, IN 46106---9522 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-205 VINCENT, PAUL E & CECILE A 65 FARM LN SOUTH DENNIS, MA 02660---3508 CRANBROOK COLONY II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG G-206 VISSERS, JOHN I & JUDITH A 3998 9TH LINE RR 2 BRADFORD, ON CANADA L3Z 3T7 ROYAL WOOD GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB, UNIT ONE TRACT N, TR N ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT 2 & TRACT N OF ROYAL VOSE JR, RICHARD A HOLLY M HARRIS VOSE 15 WINDING OAKS WAY BOXFORD, MA 01921---0000 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III, TRACT A LESS AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDO DESC IN OR 1586 PG 210 LESS AMBERLY WARZECHA JR, THEODORE V ELLEN A WARZECHA 5920 CRANBROOK WAY F-103 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III PART OF TRACT A NKA AMBERLY VILLAGE I A CONDO DESC IN OR 1515 PG 210 WAYNE L HALL REV TRUST 5924 CRANBROOK WAY #E202 NAPLES, FL 34112---8895 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III PART OF TR A NKA AMBERLY VILLAGE II AS DESC IN OR 1538 PG 639 WEIGL, WALTER B & ALBERTA R 82 LINKS WAY OXFORD, CT 06478---3100 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III, TRACT P WELCH, MARYJANE 709 BROOKLINE WAY ROCKLAND, MA 02370---0000 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III BLK G LOT 1 WERNER, DARLENE M 20622 DRAKE ROAD STRONGSVILLE, OH 44149---0000 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III, BLK G LOT 2 WHALEN TR, JAMES P JAMES P WHALEN TRUST-2003 MARGARET P WHALEN MARGARET P WHALEN TRUST-2003 97 WOODSIDE RD MEDFORD, MA 02155---2446 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III, BLK G LOT 3 WHALEN, JOHN L 15 CONNSHIRE DR WATERFORD, CT 06385---4126 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III, BLK G LOT 4 OR 1831 PG 2196 WHEALAN, FRANCIS CLARE ODEA WHEALAN 315 GRANGE PARK BRIDGEWATER, MA 02324---0000 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III BLK G LOT 5 WHELDEN, DAVID C & ANN M JAN M HALLEY-DESTEFANO ERIC DESTEFANO 38 OLD COLONY RD NORTH STONINGTON, CT 06359---1523 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III, BLK G LOT 6 PL20180000646 500' 5/10/2018 Page4 of 4 WITHAM, JAMES D & JEAN C 3665 AMBERLY CIR APT B306 NAPLES, FL 34112---2803 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III, BLK G LOT 7 WLODARCZYK, STEVEN A JUDITH R WLODARCZYK 3675 AMBERLY CIRCLE C302 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III, BLK G LOT 8 WRIGHT, JAMES E & BARBARA B 207 E GRAND AVENUE #E-5 OLD ORCHARD BCH, ME 04064---0000 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III, BLK G LOT 9 WUSCHNER, FRIEDRICH L LUCETTE M WUSCHNER 3655 AMBERLY CIR APT A204 NAPLES, FL 34112---8897 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III, BLK G LOT 10 YANUSHEFSKI, JANET L & ALEX P 406 LYNETREE DR WEST CHESTER, PA 19380---0000 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III BLK G LOT 11 YOUTH HAVEN FOUNDATION INC 5867 WHITAKER RD NAPLES, FL 34112---2963 ROYAL WOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT III, BLK G LOT 12 PROOF O.K.BY:_____________________________O.K.WITH CORRECTIONS BY:___________________________ PLEASE READ CAREFULLY •SUBMIT CORRECTIONS ONLINE ADVERTISER:Q.GRADY MINOR &ASSOCIA PROOF CREATED AT :6/12/2018 1:09 PM SALES PERSON:Ivonne Gori PROOF DUE:- PUBLICATION:ND-DAILY NEXT RUN DATE:06/21/18 SIZE:3 col X 9.25 in ND-2041569.INDD ND-2041569 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PUDZ-PL20180000646,Yo uth Haven Planned Unit Development (PUD) The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by D.Wayne Arnold,AICP, of Q.Grady Minor and Associates,P.A.and Richard D.Yo vanovich,Esq.of Coleman, Yo vanovich and Koester,P.A.,representing Ta ft Budget,LLC (Applicant)on: Wednesday,July 11,2018,5:30 pm at Shepherd of the Glades Lutheran Church,Fellowship Hall,6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd,Naples,FL 34113 Ta ft Budget,LLC has submitted a formal application to Collier County,seeking approval of a PUD Rezone.This application proposes to amend the previously approved 24± acre Yo uth Haven PUD (Ordinance 89-12)to add an approximate 1-acre RMF-6 (3) zoned parcel.The Yo uth Haven PUD,is a partially developed 24+/-acre institutional project,which permits group housing uses for children.The PUD will be modified to permit group housing for youth and senior adults.A revised master plan is proposed to identify the areas within the PUD for youth and senior group housing.The maximum intensity currently permitted is 240 group-housing beds,which is based on a maximum of 10 beds per acre.With the addition of the 1-acre parcel the new PUD acreage will be 25+/-acres;therefore,the PUD could permit up to 250 group-housing beds. The subject property (Youth Haven PUD)is comprised of approximately 25±acres, located on the south side of Whitaker Road,immediately west of Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 17,To wnship 50 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida. Business and property owners,residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation.The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only,it is not a public hearing.Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor. com/planning.If you have questions or comments,they can be directed by mail, phone,fax or e-mail to: Sharon Umpenhour,Senior Planning Te chnician Q.Grady Minor and Associates,P.A.,3800 Via Del Rey,Bonita Springs,Florida 34134 Phone:239.947.1144 Fax:239.947.0375 sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 1 of 24 Sharon: Wait. Okay. Wayne: Alright. I’m gonna go ahead and open up the neighborhood information meeting and my name is Wayne Arnold and I’m a – [Crosstalk] Female Speaker 1: Still can’t hear [inaudible] [00:00:07} Wayne: – professional planner with Q Grady Minor Associates and we’re here representing Maple Select tonight and they are the Applicant for the project. And this is Bill Henry who’s with Maple Select senior development. We have Richard Yovanovich who’s our Land Use Counsel who’s sitting here in a white shirt. Uh. Sharon Umpenhour is taping the meeting and she’s with my office. And This is Norm Trebilcock the transportation engineer from Trebilcock Planning Solutions. So, we’re here representing Youth Haven and we’re proposing an amendment to the Youth Haven planning of development. Uh. If you live in Royalwood, it’s your neighbor immediately north. It’s been there for many years now. And currently, it only allows for youth, um, youth housing. We’re asking the county to allow us to also have senior adult housing as a component of what they do. And they are adding to the planning of development about an acre of property that was a little remainder track that was part of the Santa Barbara widening. And so, it’ll bring our total acreage up about 2 5 total acres and we’re gonna add a provision to go up to 250 beds. Right now, the PUD is about – allows 240 beds because it’s 24 acres in size. So, we’re gonna add an acre. 25 acres and it’s ten beds per acre. So, it’ll be a total of 250 total beds that will be permitted. Pat: Is your mic on? Helen: [Inaudible] is the mic on? Wayne: Well, it sounds – sounds like it. [Crosstalk] Female Speaker 2: Put the mic up. Male Speaker 1: Might wanna go back to the other one. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 2 of 24 Wayne: I was gonna. Let me try to go to the other one. Female Speaker 2: Yeah. And I think you’re not gonna wanna stand right in front of the screen there. Wayne: [Inaudible] [00:01:47]. Male Speaker 2: Then – Female Speaker 2: Oh. It’s because you’re in [inaudible]. Wayne: I’ve got to stand somewhere where I’m not under the speaker. So, let me find a spot so it’s not so crazy Female Speaker 1: That’s better. Wayne: Is that any better? Pat: Yes. Wayne: And I forgot to introduce Ray Bellows. Ray Bellows is with Collier County government and Ray’s a principle – well, he’s actually in charge of zoning. He’s filling in for the principle planner that’s handling the case tonight. So, Ray’s here if you have any questions of the county or the county process. So – lost my. [Inaudible]. So, this is, uh, an exhibit that shows the Youth Haven property boundaries within [inaudible]. Sharon: You might wanna stand back that way. Wayne: So, you can see the little parcel on the – whoops. [Inaudible]. The parcel is gonna be adjacent to – I don’t like this microphone. So, the parcel we’re having is a small one-acre parcel. Oh. Wow. That’s not good. Sharon: You’re just gonna have to talk really loud. Male Speaker 3: You’ve got our attention. Sharon: Just use this and talk really loud. Wayne: I know. I just – Male Speaker 1: You gotta eat the mic. Male Speaker 4: Yeah. You gotta put it right – Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 3 of 24 Wayne: Yeah. I think I’m gonna have to do that. Is that any better? [Crosstalk] Female Speaker 1: Yes. That’s fine. Wayne: Okay. Thanks. I’m gonna stand over this way so everybody can see. So, we’re adding a one-acre piece and Norm’s gonna point to that for us. It’s right there right against Santa Barbara. It’s a little angular piece of property. And then, we’re adding that to the overall Youth Haven. And you can see on the aerial photograph the limits of Youth Haven’s development to date. And then, of course, to the south is your Royalwood Country Club with, um, your roadway and your buffer. This is a tighter aerial of the site that shows, um the project. And Norm, do you want to highlights where the senior housing components likely to go just give everybody an orientation for that? And then, this is the approved master plan for Youth Haven and it depicts, all the way on the east side, a variety of units that are allowed to be developed under the current master plan. As part of this process, we’re adopting a new master plan for the project, which would look like this. And the Youth Haven and its operations are being highlighted right now by Norm on this screen. Then we’ll have a preserve area of vegetation that will be recorded for the county’s benefit. And then, the senior housing component is proposed to be located on the eastern side of the project. And the area that we’re adding, the one- acre, is largely going to be lake and buffer area, as you can see, not entirely, but largely, there will be a water management lake on that side adjacent to the county’s canal. So, that’s our master plan. Pat Bednar: Where is Royalwood on there? For those of us that are not good with maps. Wayne: There’s Royalwood Blvd. Pat: Okay. Wayne: Just south of the existing property boundary. Pat: Okay. Right there. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 4 of 24 Wayne: And so, there’re single-family homes along that tier of Royalwood’s. And then, you golf maintenance facility is actually – you go back to an aerial. You can see your golf maintenance area right there that’s adjacent to – Male Speaker 1: There’s a road. [Crosstalk] Wayne: So, the county is part of this amendment process. We’re adding the provision for the senior component and increasing the number of beds by ten. We’re adding one acre of property. We’re also doing some other various cleanups that the county has asked us to do. That’s – the County Attorney’s Office has asked us to do some new updated language because the original project was approved back in 1988, so a lot of the old standards and comments are not applicable today. So, we’re trying to clean up those documents. But largely, I think I’ve highlighted the basic changes we’re proposing to make to the project. Pat: Are there 240 beds in Youth Haven now? Wayne: I don’t believe there are 240 beds there today. They’re allowed to put in up to 240 beds. They’ve been phasing the project over the years and – Pat: And how many are there now? Wayne: I’m sorry – Sharon: Can you state your name for the record? Wayne: One thing. Can I get everybody who wants to ask a question to state your name? Pat: Sure. Wayne: And ask the question loudly so we can get it recorded, please. Pat: Pat Bednar. How many beds are at Youth Haven now? Wayne: I don’t know exactly. We do have Youth Haven representatives here who might know the answer. Pat: Well, they should know. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 5 of 24 Joyce Zirkle: 73 [inaudible] [00:06:05] beds. Joyce: 73. Wayne: The answer was, for the record, 73 licensed beds. Pat: So, how many beds are you planning? [Crosstalk] Wayne: We have approximately 96 beds that are planned for the senior component. Pat: Mm-hmm. Wayne: Youth Haven will continue to develop, uh, potential other structures and beds as they continue to develop, but we have a maximum of 250 beds that would be allowed under the revised approvals. Pat: And so, how many units are you gonna have there? I mean, one building or what’s gonna – Wayne: Well, it’s probably gonna be a variety of – of buildings. The – they’re probably gonna be a little bit larger than the Youth Haven buildings that have been built, but I think your planning – your initial plans show four buildings built. Three – Bill Henry: Three residential buildings and one administrative building for a total of about 60,000 square feet. Pat: And when you say – Female Speaker 2: [Inaudible]. Pat: When you say residential, the population will be what? Bill: So, the 96 – the 96 beds – the 90 – this is Bill Henry with Naples Select. Pat: Yeah. Bill: So, the residential buildings will have all of the residential units and the administrative building will house administrative staff. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 6 of 24 Pat: What – well, who are the residents? That’s my question. Wayne: This is a specialty Alzheimer’s care project. Helen: Ah. Thank you. Wayne: Most of our residents will be in their mid-eighties. All of them will have been diagnosed with, um, various stages of memory care issues. Helen: Okay. Pat: Now, we had originally, like months ago, heard there was gonna be a dementia unit across and that that fell through. Is this a different plan or is this the same plan? Male Speaker 1: Well, dementia is – Bill: I would assume it’s the same plan. I mean, we’ve been working on for quite a while. Pat: Okay. Okay. Wayne: Thanks, Bill. Helen: I have one question. My name is Helen Philman. Did you say 96 beds for memory care? Bill: Correct. Helen: And what about the youth? How many beds will be – for all the rest for young people? Wayne: The balance – Helen: Do you expect to expand that? Wayne: I don’t know exactly what Bill’s contractual agreement is with Youth Haven, but the Youth Haven property in total would allow maximum of 250 beds. Bill’s proposing 96. Youth Haven has 73 today. So, theoretically, there are some additional beds that could be built by Youth Haven. Helen: If – if you – if they change to build them [inaudible] [00:08:30]. Now they say in your papers that it would take – it was gonna be planned to be done over 30 years. Is that a reasonable figure? Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 7 of 24 Wayne: I’m not sure – Helen: I read the build-out would take over 30 years. Is that reasonable? Wayne: I’m not sure what – Helen: [Inaudible]. I read that in your – your online and your papers. Wayne: I’m not sure what that would have been from. I don’t recall seeing anything – Helen: Which [inaudible]. Wayne: – about 30 year build-out. Sharon: Yeah. We don’t have anything that – that says anything about 30 years [inaudible]. Helen: If you get approval, do you expect to begin now? Wayne: [Inaudible] 96 [inaudible]. [Crosstalk] Helen: I – I mean, how [inaudible]? Wayne: If – if you’re gonna respond, [inaudible]? [Crosstalk] Helen: I just wondered if they had approval, will they begin construction now or will that be until later? Wayne: Well, Youth Haven has been going through a phase approval process since their inception and they built another cottage, I don’t know, not that many years ago – Female Speaker: And it just – it just opened. Helen: Yeah. I know. Wayne: Right. And it just opened. So, I mean, I think their program has – they rely, obviously, on donations and other funding sources. So – Helen: I – I understand. I’ve lived here a long time. I know Youth Haven. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 8 of 24 Just – [inaudible] [00:09:41]. Wayne: One thing I would say, as part of the process we’re going through, we’re required to pull this neighborhood informational meeting and get input. We provide a transcript back to the county. Um. We owe a response back to the county. They’ve had some cleanup items that they’ve asked us to provide. So, we’ll submit that to the county. We expect we’ll be ready to go to hearing after that next 30-day review or so. We don’t have hearing dates scheduled, but at this point, we’re in, you know, essentially mid-July at this point. So, probably August-September would be the earliest we could get to a planning commission hearing, which is required. And they make a recommendation, then, to the Board of County Commissioners, which we follow 30 or 45 days after our public hearings. You all have been through the process. You’ll see public hearing signs that get posted on the perimeter of the property. If you received notice for this meeting, you probably will get notice again for the planning commission hearing because we notice everybody within 500 physical feet of the property boundary. And then, we also notify your HOA on the nearest HOA. Pat: What is the cleanup, quote-quote, cleanup that you are required to do? Bill: The cleanup items, a lot of them end up being county attorney comments. We have a couple of transportation comments that our transportation engineer needs to address. There’s nothing really substantive. They we haven’t – Ray: Old citations. Bill: Yeah. There – uh, Mr. Bellows was just indicated that there are some older zoning citations that they’re wanting us to, again, remove from the document. Nothing substantive, I mean, they haven’t questioned anything we’re doing. We’ve been deemed to be consistent with the comprehensive plan with what we’re proposing to do. So, I call them cleanup items because there really isn’t anything that’s substantive to the number of units or the density of the project or anything of that nature. Wayne: Yes, ma’am. Female Speaker 3: Um. They have a 100-bed facility just the street here on Rattlesnake. [Inaudible] [00:11:24]. And they have, uh, almost 100 beds over there. Is there that much need for it? Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 9 of 24 Wayne: Well, the question is, is there that much need for these additional beds and I think the answer from Bill would be yes. It’s – it’s a large demand. I – I know Rich and I do a lot of these projects and we’re working on a great number of senior housing projects in the area. It seems to be a very large and increasing demand. Female Speaker 3: Is this pay as you go? Or is this through Medicare? Or – Wayne: Anyone wanna take a shot at that? Bill: Um. Our particular business model is 100 percent private pay. Medicare does not pay for, um, memory care services. I’m trying to think of the state of Florida. Um. There – there are some projects that would be – be able to take Medicare, but, um, it’s – specifically, it’s through the Medicaid waiver program in the state of Florida. Um. And that is project by project. Some projects will accept Medicaid waiver residence – Female Speaker 3: Is this a pay as you go? Or – Bill: It is. So, they are under a lease where they pay monthly and if they need to move out, they can move out. They don’t – they just have to give us 30 days’ notice. Female Speaker 3: Right because they’re paying five to six thousand over at Arden Court. Bill: Uh. Unfortunately, that is pretty much the going rate for the – the – Alzheimer’s patients require a very, uh, large amount of hands-on personal care and our particular business model is one that’s a very high touch and even higher level of care, it might cost a little bit more than that, but for certain people’s diagnosis, they respond much better to our type of care and that’s really our main business model because the other memory care projects that we’re familiar with in town do not necessarily offer this level of care. Um. So, we’re hoping that we’ll be able to provide great service to certain residents that aren’t able to find it elsewhere. Pat: So, with dementia, these would be locked units? Bill: Uh. They are not locked, but they have, certainly, access control and wander, um, measures that we take on the doors so that they’re key coded. Um. As you – Pat: So, the patients can’t just wander out. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 10 of 24 Bill: Correct. Pat: Yeah. That’s the question. Wayne: And I would just add to what Bill said about the rents and things like that. I mean, those are subject to change, obviously. I don’t think he’s committing that those are his exact rates. I mean, it all comes to the bear when you bring the unit on the market and what the competition is at the time. And in the back? Sue: Yeah. Sue Obermiller. Um. I was just wondering if you were planning on putting anything between Royalwood and the development at that park? Wayne: The existing Youth Haven PUD requires us to retain some native vegetation where it’s feasible. There’s some elevation changes, but our PUD requires that we’re gonna have a minimum of 15 ft. wide type B buffer. And a B buffer is – it can be a combination of a solid wall or it can be a hedge, but it has to be maintained at 80 percent opacity at six ft. high within one year. So, there’ll be trees and a hedge at a minimum in that location separating Royalwood from this project. And of course, Royalwood has some buffering on its own property. Anybody else have questions, comments? Sharon: Um. Helen: Sewage. Pat: Sewage. Wayne: What’s the question about sewage? Helen: Well, how does it affect us in Royalwood? Allen: Well, the sewage – I’m Allen Bednar. Um. Will the sewer part – your system be tied to the sewer that’s serving Royalwood at this time? Wayne: Jeff – this is Jeff Davidson sitting in the back. He’s been doing some engineering work for Royalwood over the years and just permitted their last unit. Jeff, can you address the connection between county water and sewer. Jeff: Right now – I’m Jeff Davidson with Davidson Engineering and I’ve been the, uh, engineer for Youth Haven for approximately Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 11 of 24 eight years. And, um, right now the wastewater from Youth Haven goes into the Royalwood system, which is a county-owned system. There’s an easement, utilities, and all the sewage goes there to that lift station. I know you might have seen it. On the very north side of the property, there’s a county sanitary lift station – [Crosstalk] Allen: Yes. Right next to the utility yard. Jeff: Right. It all goes there. And then, it pumps out into the county system. Allen: Okay. That’s – because that will be continued to use with your added development. Jeff: I assume so. I’m not good on the engineering, uh, for this space, but I assume they will go the same direction. Wayne: I – just to clarify that. I’m not sure we’ve made that determination yet, Jeff, where, if it’s gonna go out to somewhere else besides into the Royalwood system, but there are easements in place, obviously, for us to connect through there. I don’t think we’ve made that decision yet. Allen: Mmm. Wayne: Any other questions? Yes, sir. Male Speaker 5: What are the age limits for [inaudible] [00:16:34]. Wayne: Well – [Crosstalk] – in Collier County – yeah, there’s a minimum. In Collier County, you have to be 55 and over to be considered under the [inaudible] housing for seniors category that’s out there. It sounds like Bill’s market is primarily people substantially older than age 55. Any questions? Yes, sir. Kyle: Yeah. Kyle [inaudible] [00:16:58] of Royalwood. If the – if the community opted to have a six ft. wall be put up versus a vegetation buffer, um, would that be considered? Second question, um, assuming all of the residential buildings will be one story? Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 12 of 24 Wayne: Well, the current PUD allows two-story as the maximum building height and we haven’t proposed to change that. I know that Bill’s looking at that right now. So, whether or not they’re going to be one or two-story buildings or a combination thereof – that they won’t be greater than two stories under the existing conditions. Kyle: It’ll be – in the plan shown, are you, um – because I can’t see the building – or that seems the previous [inaudible] um, project. And at that time, they were all being [inaudible] and I think it was a bunch going on on the senior side of it. Those structures were all looked at to be at, uh, one-story facilities. But that’s still up in the air to be determined. Wayne: That is to be determined. Kyle: Okay. And them, on the wall, if we decided we didn’t want the landscape offer, we were at preference to add a wall, to have a wall be put in there, along the Royalwood. And then, to buffer around its interior. Would that be a consideration? Bill: Well, I think the code has certain requirements for separating the two uses and what I described as having either a hedge or a wall with – with the trees meets the county’s minimum requirement for separating the two uses. At present, you all have four-ft. high chain-link fence with some vegetation that you provided to your current buffer to – to Youth Haven. So, I – I – it’s a question we can certainly consider, but I’m not sure we’re willing to make any commitment to a wall, certainly tonight. Kyle: Okay. Wayne: Yes, sir. Looks like you got another question. Allen: `The other thing I noticed with Youth Haven, now – this is Allen Bednar again – is that you have a lot of light pollution. You have, what, security lighting there, I’m assuming, and it really lights up the neighborhood and it’s – it’s kind of coming into – into Royalwood on that side and we’re – is that same kind of lighting going to be in the, um, in the, um, in this Alzheimer’s area too? Wayne: You know, I – I’m not that familiar with the specific lighting plan that Youth Haven has. It’s – the county standards have changed for lighting over time and our newer standards require some cut-off lighting fixtures and – and you can’t put glare on the neighboring properties and things of that nature. Maybe [inaudible] [00:19:28] even addressed that, but Norm’s also a lighting expert and I think Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 13 of 24 he can tell you that we’ll be required to make sure that our lights village is managed. Pat: What does the county – what are the county – can you comment on that? Ray: For the record, Ray Bellows, I’m the Zoning Manager for the county and most the PUDs where the institutional use is and securities are concerned, lighting is also addressed and we have some, as Mr. Arnold mentioned, cut-off lighting, meaning they’re shielded so they shine away from the adjacent residential areas. That’s typically a commitment contained in the PUD so when subsequent site plans come in that we’re reviewing, they know to make sure the lightings consistent with that. Pat: Thank you. Wayne: Anybody else? Yes, sir. Male Speaker 2: This’ll be county-run. Is that right? Wayne: No, sir. It’ll be privately owned and operated. [Crosstalk] Wayne: Yes. The county – county doesn’t really have anything to do with this project. Male Speaker 2: Well, will there be a – a kind of a guard structure for taking guards? Or security forces? Wayne: I don’t suspect that there is going to be a gated security personnel like you would find at another gated residential community, but they do have security measures that they install for the residents and they also have, obviously, on staff and 27/7 staffing of the facility. Allen: The – the – another issue – Allen Bednar again – uh, is that there was some youth found in Royalwood from time to time who had jumped the fence and – and had come over to our neighborhood. Um. And that is another issue that, uh, I’m sure Royalwood would be concerned about. I know some residents have talked to me about it and found them in our garages and things like that. So, security, I think, is an issue too, even though those boys don’t seem to be, um, that aggressive, but, it was still an issue. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 14 of 24 Wayne: Okay. Thank you. Yes, ma’am. Sue: Um. The fence that’s now separating the, uh, Youth – Sue Obermiller – um, the fence that’s separating Youth Haven now for the new part of Youth Haven, is that tall fence gonna be left there separating it or is that coming down? Wayne: Jeff, do you know the answer to that? Jeff: It – it will remain. Wayne: The – the tall fence that runs perpendicular to the – Jeff: No plans to remove that or change that configuration. Yeah. Sue: Okay. Wayne: Okay. Thank you. Anything else? Helen: Has this been approved by the county? Or – Wayne: This project has not been approved yet by the county. We’re going through that process and, uh, if all goes well, we hope to have our approvals by sometime later this Fall. Sue: Sometime when? Wayne: Later this Fall. Helen: One question. What will the height of the buildings be? Wayne: Well, I don’t think we know exactly the – the PUD document as it exists that Youth Haven’s been building under limits them to two stories maximum height. Helen: Two stories. Wayne: Two stories maximum height and we’re not proposing to change that and Bill and his group are looking at whether or not they will do single – single-story or up to two-story buildings. Helen: But not anything more high-rise? Wayne: No. No high-rise type constructions at all. Yes, ma’am. Barbara: Hey. Barbara Oakley. Um. I’m a little confused at this, uh, facility Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 15 of 24 is to be privately owned and operated. What is this connection to Youth Haven? Is there – is it just gonna be on land that’s owned by Youth Haven? What’s – is there a connection to Youth Haven? I – Wayne: There’s no direct connection to Youth Haven. It’s my understanding that the Youth Haven Foundation owns the property. Youth Haven foundation, um, doesn’t need the entirety of the property based on their current direction for the youth. So, it – it made sense to look at other partnering opportunities and Bill and his group were happy to look at this for senior housing component on the same property. Barbara: Okay. So, this facility’s just being built on land that’s owned Youth Haven? Wayne: Yes. Barbara: That’s the only – only connection? Wayne: And we’re married under the same zoning guidelines. Barbara: Okay. Thank you. Female Speaker 3: So, the land is now being sold. Wayne: The land is going to be sold to Bill’s group if this is successful. Female Speaker 3: Okay. Wayne: Yes, ma’am. Sue: Sue Obermiller. Um. The – the units that are left after the 96 and 70, whatever – the difference between the 250 – the additional units, those are all going to be youth units and are those going on, some of those, going on this property or are they all going on the other property that youths [inaudible] [00:24:12]. Wayne: It is my understanding that the balance of those units will be controlled by Youth Haven and they would go on the principle area that Youth Haven developed. Female Speaker 2: Can you show a map [inaudible]. Maybe you already did, but I’m a little slow with maps. Can you show a map showing the 25 acres? The boundaries of the 25 acres? Wayne: Everything that’s highlighted and says “Youth Haven.” Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 16 of 24 Female Speaker 2: Most of us can’t see that. Female Speaker: Yeah. Right. Female Speaker 2: If it says “Youth Haven,” we’ll have to believe you because we can’t see. [Crosstalk] Wayne: It’s outlined in red, the area is. Female Speaker 2: That’s – okay. Wayne: And the yellow piece that’s adjacent to – so it’s Youth Haven area that’s outlined in red is about 24 acres. Helen: Oh. There it is. Okay. Wayne: Which you’re adding one acre that’s to the east. Female Speaker 2: So, what are we looking at? Tell us like what’s around it. Wayne: Okay. The area south is Royalwood Blvd. And homes, Royalwood. Immediately east is Santa Barbara Blvd. Whitaker road is the road that we’ll have access to as we currently do. Female Speaker 2: And then – so the dark green right behind the red line. Who owns that? Wayne: That is a vacant residential piece of property. If you drive down Whitaker road there’s a “For Sale” sign on that. So, multi-family housing community that could be developed there. Female Speaker 2: Thank you. Wayne: Anyone else? Female Speaker 1: Could you tell me again how’s – how – how many total beds were there? Wayne: The PUDs we’re proposing to amend it. It currently allows 240 beds. Female Speaker 1: Okay. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 17 of 24 Wayne: We’re proposing to amend it to allow 250 beds. Female Speaker 1: Okay. And 96 Alzheimer’s. Wayne: Yes. Bill’s group would build approximately 96 Alzheimer’s senior units. Female Speaker 2: So, Bill’s group would buy how many acres? [Crosstalk] Wayne: It’s approximately nine acres that comprises what – uh. Female Speaker 2: So, that’s where you come up with – what is it? Ten per acre did you say? Wayne: The PUD right now allows ten beds per acre. Female Speaker 2: Per acre. Wayne: Yes. So, about 24 acres times ten units times ten beds per acre, it’s 240 beds that are [inaudible] [00:26:22]. Female Speaker 2: But you’re building – you would be buying nine acres, so then, there only should be nine – 90 beds? Wayne: Well, it’s based on the overall PUD how many there were approved. It was never allocated, uh, for Youth Haven. If you look at their plan – whoops. Female Speaker 2: So, when something is sold, it’s in the same PUD? I’m a little confused how this works. Wayne: Yes. So, the density applies throughout the PUD boundary. Norm, can you highlight on that? The area where Bill is proposing to build. You can see the Youth Haven had plans and allowances to build units throughout that property. The 240 units previously approved were not required to be in any specific configuration or an area of the site. Norm: Like the lake takes up area where no units would be built or that’s hardly overall. Female Speaker 2: So, is there a lake there now or you’re building a lake? Wayne: There is a lake there that Norm highlighted right there. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 18 of 24 Pat: That [inaudible] [00:27:11] out. Okay. I’ve never [inaudible]. Wayne: [Inaudible] [00:27:11] there’s a lake. And then, our plan – Norm, can you highlight the lake that we’re proposing to build? That’s adjacent to Santa Barbara Blvd. Pat: That’s a lake. Wayne: Yeah. Pat: And the other – [Crosstalk] Norm: And the existing lake there. Pat: And what’s this other little? Male Speaker 1: That’s – Wayne: In the middle is a vegetative reserve. Female Speaker 2: Vegetation. Okay. Thank you. [Crosstalk] Wayne: Anybody else? Going once, twice. Should we adjourn? Wayne: Let me just say before we do that, um, we provide links on our website, GradyMinor.com, for any of this information. Ray Bellows and his staff have the complete file with Collier County if you want to follow it that way. You can pick up one of Sharon Umpenhour’s business cards from the table and feel free to email her or call her and we’ll provide you with, uh, anything we certainly can to help you answer questions about – Pat: Sharon works with Grady Minor? Wayne: Sharon is a coordinating, she’s will Grady Minor. Sharon: That’s me. Pat: With the recording. She’s with Grad y Minor. Okay. Sharon’s title is? Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 19 of 24 Wayne: She is a Senior Planning Technician. Pat: Okay. Wayne: And that’s cause she’s over 50. [Crosstalk] Male Speaker 5: Did you record that? Did you record that? [Crosstalk] Pat: So, if this is approved, you’re gonna start doing this when? Wayne: Well, the question is, if this is approved, when do we start? And I think Bill’s answer would be as soon as he can get through the approval process, but we have – if we get through this public hearing process successfully, we’ll have an administrative site plan engineering review process that takes four to six months to get through that process with Collier County. So, it would be sometimes, probably, early to mid-2019 before Bill, at the earliest, could break ground. Pat: Bill, what is your company called? Bill: My company is called Naples Select Senior Development. Pat: And you have other places in town or no? Bill: That particular company does not, but our investment group, um, has developed a number of properties throughout the country. Pat: Well, any in Florida? Bill: Uh. We’ve got a number in – currently in development. Pat: What are some of the ones that are already developed and where are they? Bill: I’m sorry? Pat: What are some of the ones that are already developed and where are they? Bill: There are two in Colorado, one in Georgia. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 20 of 24 Pat: And what are their names? Bill: Um. Peeregrine. Pat: Is that Colorado? Bill: That’s Colorado – Colorado. Pat: Can you spell that for me? Bill: P-E-R-E-G-R-I-N-E. Peregrine Landings. Um. And then, the other is called Thrive At Green Island. Pat: One more time. Bill: Thrive At Green Island in Columbus, Georgia. Helen: But not – no – and none so far in Florida. Bill: Correct. [Crosstalk] Pat: And how long have they been there? These companies. These facilities. Bill: Um. The one in Georgia either just recently opened or opened four weeks ago. The two in Colorado have been open for – uh. One has been open for 16 months, the other, 12. Pat: And are you a subsidiary of some other big name up here? Bill: No. Pat: Okay. And now, who – you come under what guidelines? What – um – who follows you as far as, uh, hospitals, a joint commission, like who keeps track on your care and what’s going on with it? Bill: Well, the state more than anyone else. Um. All of our facilities are licensed. Our operators are licensed in their respective states. The state surveys every one of our buildings to make sure the minimum standards are met, the quality of care is – meets minimum standards and those, uh, state surveys and public information. So, all of us operates under those, um, regulatory restraints. Pat: Okay. And what is your title? Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 21 of 24 Bill: I’m President of Naples Select. Pat: President. Okay. Thank you. Helen: The senior living [inaudible] [00:31:31]. Are those, um, one and two-bedroom apartments? Or – Bill: Uh. Studio and one-bedroom apartments. Helen: Studio. So, that’s – studio is smaller than one-bedroom? Bill: Correct. Helen: Okay. Pat: And how much would be for parking spaces? Bill: Excuse me? Pat: I know – I don’t expect your tenants to be driving, but for parking, for your health, or – what is the parking gonna be over there? Wayne: Ma’am, I don’t know the specific parking standard because some of it will be based on what is mix of how many one-bedroom or studio units he will have. Pat: I assume your patients will not be driving, is that correct? [Crosstalk] Wayne: Yes. That’s correct, but the county has standards that are a little different than maybe – the county codes aren’t quite as current – Bill: [Inaudible] [00:32:19] code has specific for a period of use. Wayne: Yeah. They’re – we’re subject to the Collier County land development code with regard to the parking standards. Pat: And it – and that goes by the beds you have? I’m a little confused. No. Wayne: Yes, ma’am, it does. It varies – Pat: Even though those patients won’t be driving. Okay. Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 22 of 24 Wayne: Yes. It doesn’t really – the county code doesn’t really have a parking standard for a memory care, for instance. It doesn’t distinguish it from just an age 55 and over and an [inaudible] community. So – [Crosstalk] Pat: So, you’ll have quite a bit of parking there. Okay. Wayne: Um. Hopefully, build as little as we can and the county does have some processes if it looks like it’s gonna be excessive, the county has a deviation process that we can ask for as part of our site plan review. Pat: And so, the drainage over there, everything’s passed, I assume, is that how that works? Drainage for water, or whatever. Wayne: The surface water management system will be permitted through the South Florida management district and it will also be reviewed by Collier County at the time of site plan review when we have detailed engineering drawings. But we’re subject to this very – very strict standards Collier County has for this base and they were part of the Lely area improvement projects. So, the county have various, like, strict requirements for the discharge and things of that nature. Plus, we have our on-site water management lake that we’ll be discharging too. Pat: And you’re required to go up a certain – like a new house would be, you have to go up so high, is that it? Wayne: I’m sure that the land elevation in places will have to be elevat ed just like your community was and just like other new – new parts of Youth Haven, as they develop, will be too. Pat: Okay. Helen: So, there’s one bedroom, um – um. Places – do they have a place to cook? Or – Bill: Uh. No. Our residents are not cooking in their units. Uh. Pat: Right. Hopefully. Bill: They’re not – they’re not permitted to cook in their units and – because they – memory care residents are very different than, say, assisted living or independent living residents. They are further Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 23 of 24 along the continuum of care and in order to maintain safety for everyone. Helen: So, they would have a dining room? Bill: Yes. There is a common dining room. Exactly. And a common kitchen that all the residents get served from. Wayne: Okay. All good questions. Anything else before we adjourn for the evening? Pat: So, we’ll be notified when there’s more meetings? Or how does this go? Wayne: If you received notice for this meeting tonight, you will receive a notice from Collier County of our nex t meeting, which will be a planning commission here. Your Home-Owners Association probably will also notify you if you get email blast through them. And then, signage will be placed on the site with hearing dates on it indicating the location and time of the hearings. Yes, ma’am. Sue: Sue Obermiller. Will the signage only be on Whitaker Road? Or will it also be, um, along Royalwood Blvd.? Wayne: We probably – there will be none inside your community. No. It has to be on the public road. So, it would be external, probably one on Santa Barbara and at least one on Whitaker Road. Sue: I thought maybe – Wayne: And there’s also gonna be an ad in the Naples daily newspaper. People follow the legal notices. Sue: I thought maybe it would be on that property only where it was visible from [inaudible] [00:35:35]. Wayne: No. No. There’s no requirement for us to put signage outside of [inaudible]. Sue: Okay. Helen: Do you have a name to this development? Wayne: Bill, do you have a working name yet for the project? Bill: I do. We have a working name. The current name is Memory Care Youth Haven PUD (PL20180000646) – July 11, 2018 NIM Page 24 of 24 Cottages of Naples. Helen: Never care. Bill: Memory Care – [Crosstalk] – Memory Care Cottages of Naples. Thank you. Wayne: Thank you. Anybody else? If not, we’re gonna adjourn the meeting and let everybody get home. Thank you all for coming out. Thanks for all the good questions. [End of Audio] Duration: 37 minutes Youth Haven RPUD July 11, 2018 Neighborhood Information Meeting Project Team 2 •Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney –Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. •D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner –Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. •Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PE, Traffic Engineer –Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA •William Henry, President –Naples Select Senior Development, LLC Project Information 3 Existing Zoning:Youth Haven Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD)(24+/- acres,limited to 240 children)and RMF-6(3)(1+/-acres) Proposed Zoning:Youth Haven (RPUD) Project Acreage:25+/-acres Proposed PUD Rezone Request:Addition of a 1+/-acre parcel,10 people and allow seniors in addition to children Project Density:10 beds per acre Location Map 4 ROYAL WOODS G&C CLUB Aerial Photograph 5 WHITAKER RD.SANTA BARBARA BLVD. Approved Master Plan (24+/-acres)6 Proposed Conceptual Master Plan (25+/-acres)7 Questions? 8