Loading...
Backup Documents 10/12/2010 Item #16I 1 6 I !rt" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE October 12,2010 1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED: A. Districts: 1) North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District: Resolution 10-025 adopting final millage rate for FY 1 0-11 ; Resolution 10-026 adopting final impact fee rates for FY 10-11; Resolution 10-027 adopting Final Budget for FY 10-11 General Fund and Inspection Fee Fund; Resolution 10-028 adopting Final Budget for FY 10-11 for Impact Fee Fund; Budgets for FY 10-11 for General Fund, Impact Fee Fund and Inspection Fee Fund; Annual Financial Report for FY ended 9/30/09; District's Audit for FY ended 9/30/09; District Map; Registered Office and Agent Form; Meeting Schedule FY 10-11; Public Facilities Report; Five Year Strategic Plan. B. Minutes: 1) Affordable Housing Commission: Minutes of July 12,2010. 2) Airport Authority: Minutes of August 23, 2010. 3) Collier County Citizens Corps: Agenda of June 16,2010. Minutes of June 16,2010; August 25,2010 no quorum. 4) Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee: Minutes of August 12, 2010. 5) Collier County Planning Commission: Minutes of June 15,2010 special session; July 1,2010. 6) Contractors Licensing Board: Minutes of August 18, 2010 regular session; August 18, 2010 workshop session. 7) Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Advisory Committee: Agenda of August 25,2010. Minutes of July 7, 2010. 8) Golden Gate Beautification Advisory Committee: Agenda of September 14, 2010. Minutes of August 10, 2010 9) Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Committee: Agenda of June 7, 2010. Minutes of June 7. 2010. 10) Immokalee Beautification Advisory Committee: Agenda of August 25, 2010. Minutes of June 23, 2010. 11) Land Acquisition Advisory Committee: Minutes of July 12,2010. 12) Lelv Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee: Agenda of September 16, 2010. Minutes of August 19,2010. 13) Parks and Recreation Advisory Board: Agenda of August 18,2010. Minutes of June 16,2010. 14) Tourist Development Council: Minutes of January 25,2010; May 3,2010; July 26, 2010. C. Other: 1) Collier County Special Magistrate: Minutes of August 6, 2010. 2) Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council: Adopted Annual Budget for FY 10-11, 16/ J. Christopher Lombardo, Chairman Margaret Hanson, Vice Chairman Paul J. Moriarty, Sr. Treasurer James Burke, Commissioner John O. McGowan, Commissioner R. '~Veter."pl~.:llA r . ECEIVEU~aples,FL 34109 S (239) 597-3222 "EP 2 4 2010 Fax (239) 597-7082 'Board nt Court,- CornmissioneNi North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District September 23,2010 Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Building F Naples, FL 34112 To the Board of County Commissioners, Enclosed please find the following: 1. Copy of Resolution 10-025 of the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District, adopting the final millage rate for the fiscal year 2010-2011. 2. Copy of Resolution 10-026 of the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District, adopting the final impact fee rates for the fiscal year 2010-2011. 3. Copy of Resolution 10-027 adopting the Final Budget for the fiscal year 2010-2011 for the General Fund and the Inspection Fee Fund. 4. Copy of Resolution 10-028 adopting the Final Budget for the Impact Fee Fund for the fiscal year 2010-2011. 5. Copy ofthe Budgets for the fiscal year 2010-2011 for the General Fund, the Impact Fee Fund and the Inspection Fee Fund for the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District. If you require any additional information, please contact me at the above number. Very truly yours, <i~ (}~,v k~~ BECKY POGAN BRONSDON Assistant Chief of Administrative Services Enclosures BJB/bb f .-......""'''' . 16111 A RESOLUTION 10-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE FINAL LEVY OF AD VALOREM TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, sections 1 and 3 of the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District's Charter within section 3 of chapter 99-450, Laws of Florida, authorizes the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District to levy an ad valorem taxation on property within its boundaries in Collier County in an amount not to exceed 1 mills; and WHEREAS, the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District on September 20, 2010 adopted Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Final Millage Rate following the public hearing required by section 200.065, Florida Statutes; and WHFRFAS; the urosc taxable vahie for operatinc purposes not exempt from ad valorem taxation within the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District has been certified by the Collier County Property Appraiser as $23,023,046,549; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS OF THE NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT of Collier County Florida, that the Fiscal Year 2010-2011 operating millage rate for the North Naples Fire Control &Rescue District is 1.00 mills per$1,000.00, which is less than the rolled-back rate of 1.1174 mills per$1,000.00 by 10.51%. Such millage rate will be collected pursuant to the same manner and form as county taxes. [3.16/bb 9-14-10 A 1611 RESOLUTION 10-025 SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 PAGE TWO OF THREE This resolution shall take effect immediate}■ upon its adoption. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner ;� , and the Vote was as follows: Commissioner J. Christopher Lombardo: \M Commissioner Margaret Hanson: ! , Commissioner Paul J. Moriarty. Sr.: ( :C Commissioner John Mcgowan.: �` Commissioner M. James Burke: � '' A, Dui. passed on this 20th day of September. 20I0 by the Board of Fire Commissioners of the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District. NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT Commissioner k.-Christopher Lombardo. Chairrgal Commissioner-Margaret Manson. Vice Chairman vY' a, (... Commissioner Paii1J. Moriarty, Sr.: Treasurer QA BJB%bb Q-14-10 2 1611A1 ' RESOLUTION 10-025 SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 PAGE THREE OF THREE Commissioner.fiohn McGowan Comm i sioner M. James Burke • BJBlbb 9-14-10 3 1611A ! 04 RESOLUTION 10-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,ADOPTING FINAL IMPACT FEE RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, section 8 of the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District's Charter within section 3 of chapter 99-450, Laws of Florida, authorizes the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District to assess impact fees for capital improvements on new construction within its boundaries; and WHEREAS, the calculation of impact fee rates assessed effective for the 2010-2011 fiscal year was based upon the most recent and localized data, as evidenced by the Fire/Rescue Service Impact Fee Update Study dated January 2006; and WHEREAS, the accounting of the impact fee revenues and expenditures are provided for and reported in a separate and segregated special revenue fund entitled Impact Fee Fund; and WHEREAS, Collier County collects the impact fees for the District and charges an administrative fee to cover the County's actual costs of such collection, pursuant to an Interlocal Agreement dated September 25, 1990;and WHEREAS, the impact fees adopted by the Board of Fire Commissioners of the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District for the 2010-2011 fiscal year are imposed in compliance with Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes; and 13113/bb 8-27-10 1 1611 Al RESOLUTION 10-026 SEPTEMBER 20,2010 PAGE TWO OF THREE WHEREAS, the final impact fee rates adopted by the Board of Fire Commissioners were adopted at a Public Meeting held on September 20, 2010; NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS OF THE NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT of Collier County Florida,that the final charges for impact fees of$.14 per square foot of defined living area for residential development and $.49 per square foot of useable area for commercial and industrial structures as defined in section 8 of the North Naples Fire Control& Rescue District's Charter within section 3 of chapter 99-450, Laws of Florida are adopted. No reduction in the assessed impact fee charge is authorized. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner /4.6014JA..a , who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner _ # 3`a'`f , and the Vote was as follows: Commissioner J. Christopher Lombardo: Commissioner Margaret Hanson: Commissioner Paul J. Moriarty, Sr.: Commissioner John McGowan.: y Commissioner M. James Burke: BJB/bb 8-27-10 2 1 611A1 RESOLUTION 10-026 SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 PAGE THREE OF THREE Duly passed on this 20th day of September, 2010 by the Board of Fire Commissioners of the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District. NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT _ � - ! v Commissioner J. C opher Lombardo, Chai r 1/11--,-.4-.0-.)-%__/ Comp ner rgaret H. - en, Vice Chairman r 4.....,_ ne.:;.-4 .- AL., ! ' . Commissipnec u' . oriarty, Sr., Trea/ rer . ...„.1 A Commissione \ohn c • , an 40, A, it; rn Commi Toner M. James Burke BJB/bb 8-27-10 3 16IA RESOLUTION 10-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE FINAL BUDGETS FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND INSPECTION FEE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS , the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District of Collier County. Florida. on September 20. 2010 held a public hearing as required by Florida Statute 200.065: and WHEREAS, the North Naples Fire Control R. Rescue District of Collier County- Florida. set forth the final appropriations in the amount of 524.557,000 and final revenue estimates in the amount of 522.512.885 for the General Fund for the Fiscal Year 2010-2011: and Wi-;FRF 4S, the North Naples Fire Control k Rescue District of Collier • County. Florida, set forth the final appropriations in the amount of$500,274 and final revenue estimates in the amount of$502,000 for the Inspection Fee Fund for the fiscal year 2010-2011; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS OF THE NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT of Collier County Florida, that: 1. The Fiscal year 2010.!2011 Final Budget for the General Fund be adopted. 2. The Fiscal year 2010/2011 Final Budget for the Inspection Fee Fund be adopted. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. BJBIbb G-14-10 16 1 1 A 1 RESOLUTION 10-027 SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 PAGE TWO OF THREE ) , The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner ,_...::: !: ,t_,;;;-), - _.:1'::,• . who moved its adoption. :: .. The motion was seconded by Commissioner I i ,' :---, — . r''' r.--. . and the Vote was as follows: Commissioner J. Christopher Lombardo: • 1 ,,, • --- Commissioner Margaret Hanson: t Commissioner Paul J. Moriarty. Sr.: Commissioner John McGowan: Commissioner M. James Burke: \,' , iThuly passe:2 on this ?Oth flay of ceptemb,-r. '1010 by tiln Pt-sar(4 nC F;"• •Commissioners of the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District. NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT _ ,.- _— ------ -_,- f: -;, . 6, --- Commissioner.1. Christopher Lombardo. Chairmafi ." ) „.*...... .. • .,...; ,-..---v-e-,--c—v--,._< ConimissioneeMargaret Hanson, Vice Chairman ( • ../ , ,... ---—.---t. -7-t/ ._;:-- • •,: -- - .. _ - Commissioner Paul : Moriarty, Sr., Treasurer R.IBibt,g-I4-10 ') — 16 1AJ RESOLUTION 10-027 SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 PAGE THREE OF THREE Commissioner John McGowan /171 Commission: M. James Burke BJBPol 9-14-10 j 16I1Aj RESOLUTION 10-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE FINAL BUDGET FOR THE IMPACT FEE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS , the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District of Collier County, Florida, on September 20, 2010 held a public hearing as required by Florida Statute 200.065; and WHEREAS, the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District of Collier County, Florida, set forth the final appropriations in the amount of$500,000 and final revenue estimates in the amount of$228,000 for the Impact Fee Fund for the Fiscal Year 2010-2011; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS OF THE NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT of Collier County Florida, that the fiscal year 2010/2011 Final Budget for the Impact Fee Fund be adopted. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner b c n.kcz,,,try , who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner 1/"4.,40.41 , and the Vote was as follows: BJB/bb 9-14-10 1 ) 1611A4 RESOLUTION 10-028 SEPTEMBER 20,2010 PAGE TWO OF TWO Commissioner J. Christopher Lombardo: Commissioner Margaret Hanson: vi Commissioner Paul J. Moriarty, Sr.: Al Commissioner John McGowan: Commissioner M. James Burke: f Duly passed on this 20th day of September, 2010 by the Board of Fire Commissioners of the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District. NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT - 7--- s M �) :` Co?nsinnerJ Christopher Lombardo, Chtirman dokAtairc:.,.._...s.,... Commissione 1 argaret Hanson, Vice Chairman I . 4 i it-Ai Commis'io • �' , . Moriarty, Sr., 1,asurer tkibkh-, . Commissio+erg.McGowan III 140 , Commi„ioner M. James Burke B1B/bb 9-14-10 2 BJB/bb 7 -15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 16 11 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT FEE BUDGET INSPECTION FEE BUDGET 2010-2011 FINAL ADOPTED BUDGET 2010-2011 Final POST Hearing INDEX INCOME Collier County Ad Valorem Interest-General Interest-CD Interest-Ad Valorem Other Income Firewatch Fees Income Recap EXPENSE Salaries Salaries-Prevention Commissioners On Call Pay Professional & Incentive Pay Prof. & Incentive Pay - Prevention Overtme-Operations Overtime-Prevention Overtime-Firewatch Overtime-Ad m i n istration Overtime-Beach Patrol Overtime-Training Overtime-Spec. Teams Overtime-Paramedics Overtime -Reimburseable Training Training Bonus Holiday Pay Sick Time Payout Sick Time Payout-Prevention Vacation Payout Retirement-FRS Retirement-fRS-Prev. Retirement-175 Retirement-175-Prev. Retirement - Commissioners Retirement - Fire Chief Social Security Social Security - Prevention Worker's Compensation Worker's Compensation-Prevention BJB/bb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 1611.Al~ PAGE NUMBER 2 3 3 3 4 5 6 8 to 1 0 8 to 1 0 11 13 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 17 17 18 18 18 19 19 20 20 12 20 21 21 21 21 Final POST Hearing INDEX EXPENSE (CONTINUED) Short Term/Long Term Disability Short Term/Long Term Disability-Prev. Life/Health/Dental Insurance Life/HealthlDentallns.-Prevention Life/Health Ins.-Commissioners Post Employment Health Plan Employee Physicals Retirement Recognition Unemployment Insurance Building, Auto & Liab. Ins. Communications Telephone Utilities Vehicle Maintenance Building Maintenance-General Bldg. Maint.-St. 40 Bldg. Maint.-St. 42 Bldg. Maint.-St. 43 Bldg. Maint.-St. 44 Bldg. Maint.-St. 45 Bldg. Maint.-St. 46 Bldg. Maint.-St. 47 Bldg. Maint-Support Services Equip. Maint.- SCBA Equip. Maint.-Nozzle Equip. Maint.-Fire Computer Maintenance Hydrant Maintenance & Repair Emergency Medical Services/Supplies Office Supplies Office Supplies-Prevention Protective Gear Uniforms Hurricane/Emergency Supplies Station Supplies Office Equipment-Non-Cap. Office Equipment-Prevention Fire Equipment-Non-Capital Shop Equipment-Non-Capital Warehouse/Logistics Supplies Professional Fees Collier County Property Appraiser Fees BJB/bb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 1611Al PAGE NUMBER 22 22 23 23 11 23 24 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 28,29 29 30 30 30 31 31 31 32 32 33 32 33 34 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 38 39 39 40 40 41 41 Final POST Hearing INDEX EXPENSE (CONTINUED) Collier County Tax Collector Fees Auditor Fees Special Assessment-St. 44 Travel & Per Diem Public Information Office Public Education Office Vehicle Fuel/Oil Training Education (College, Courses & Conferences) Training Equipment and Supplies Miscellaneous Subscription/Dues SubscriptionlDues-P revention PETC Legal Advertisements Dive Team Fire Prevention Material & Supplies Hazardous Materials Team Technical Rescue Team Boat Team CERT Peer Fitness K-9 Search & Rescue Contingency CAPITAL PURCHASES: Station Improvements & Equipment Fire and Rescue Equipment Protective Gear Medical Equipment Communication Equipment Office Equipment Computers Technical Rescue Team Equipment Fire Prevention Equipment Land Boat Team Equipment Training Equipment Vehicles Shop Equipment BJB/bb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 16 j 1 ~ f PAGE NUMBER 42 42 43 43 44 44 45 46-47 48 48 49 50 50 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 56 56 57 58-59 60 60 60 61 61 62 62 63 63 63 64 64 64 Final POST Hearing INDEX EXPENSE (CONTINUED) CAPITAL PURCHASES (CONTINUED) PAGE NUMBER LogisticslWarehouse HazMat Team Equipment Dive Team Equipment Fire Apparatus 65 65 65 66 Designated Reserves 67-68 BJB/bb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 16/1A1J Final POST Hearing 16 ".1 }t')1 GENERAL FUND-2010/2011 Amended Budaet Budaet Increase/(Decrease) ok 2009-2010 2010-2011 09-10 vs, 10-11 Inc/Dee Balance Forward-Designated 14,795.829 12,813,759 Balance Forward-Undesignated - - Total-Cash Reserve Carry Forward 14,795,829 12,813,769 (1,982,070) REVENUE Collier County Ad Valorem (Millage - 1 1.00) 24,038,878 21,871,894 (2,166,9841 -9.01% 1 2 C.C.-Ad Valorem over 95% - 2 3 Interest-General 130,000 132,974 2,974 2.29% 3 4 Interest-CD 250.000 150,000 (100,0001 -40.00% 4 6 Interest-Ad Valorem - - - 6 6 Fire Watch Fees 30,000 20,000 (10.000) -33.33'~ 6 7 Occuoational Lie. Fees 46,000 36,000 (10,000) -22.2r~ 7 8 Flow Test 3.000 3,000 - 0.00% 8 9 Hydrant Maintenance Fees 15,000 2,500 (12,600) -83.33% 9 10 Insoec.-Thrust Blocks - - 10 11 Kev Boxes 10.030 4,000 (6.030) -60.12% 11 12 Reinsoection Fees 500 (500) -100.00% 12 13 Rental- Cell Tower 36,160 61,207 16,047 46.64% 13 14 Station Rental-EMS 26.310 26310 - 0.00% 14 15 Other Rental 48,000 36,000 (12,000) -25.00% 15 16 Donations, Gifts, Grants 500 (500) -100.00% 16 20 Misc. Revenue 6.000 16,000 10,000 200.00% 20 21 Misc. Rev.-RefundslReimb. 135,000 136,000 - 0.00% 21 22 Reimbursement - Trainino 20,000 6,000 (16,000) -75.00% 22 23 FalselMalfunetioning Alarm Fees 25 000 25 000 - O.OO'~ 23 TOTAL INCOME 24,817,378 22.512,885 (2.304.493) -9.29% Personnel Services 30 Salaries 11 533.928 10,731,050 (802,8781 -6.96% 30 31 Salaries-Prevention 646,992 775,358 128,366 19.84% 31 32 Commissioners 30.000 30 000 - 0.00% 32 33 On Call Pay 25,000 10,000 (15,000) -60.00% 33 34 Prof. Pay 166,120 130,000 (35,120) -21.27% 34 35 Prof. PaY-Prevention 4.800 4.800 - 0.00% 35 36 Holiday 288.748 288,748 - 0.00% 36 37 Overtime-Ooerations 200,000 400,000 200,000 100.00% 37 37A Overtlme-Malntaln Staffing Level 493.778 - (493.778) -100.00% 38 Overtime-Prevention 23,000 18,000 (5.000) -21.74% 38 39 Overtime-Firewatch 30,000 30,000 - 0.00% 39 40 Overtime-Spec. Teams 193.722 207.970 14.248 7.35% 40 41 Overtime-Administration 6,000 1.000 (5.000 -83.33% 41 42 Overtime-Beach Patrol 1,000 - (1,000 -100.00% 42 43 Overtime-Paramedic Training 50.000 - 50.000 -100.00% 43 44 Overtime - Reimburseable Trainino 20.000 1.000 19,000 -95.00% 44 46 Overtime - Trainina 30,000 - 30,000 -100.00% 46 46 Trainina Bonus 45.000 45 000 - 0.00% 46 47 Vacation Pay 50.000 175.000 125.000 250.00% 47 48 Sick Leaye Pay 421,978 421,978 - 0.00% 48 49 Sick Leave-Prevention 20.648 20,648 - 0.00% 49 50 Social Security 1,038,566 954.867 (83.699 -8.06% 50 61 Soc. Security-Prevention 53,201 64,644 11.443 21.51% 61 52 Disability Insurance 53.524 30.000 (23.524 -43.95% 52 53 Disability Ins.-Prevention 16.000 16.000 53 64 LifelHealth Insurance 2,997.142 2.329.000 (668,142 -22.29% 64 55 lifelHealth Ins.-Prev. 278,604 209.896 68,708 -24.66% 65 56 life/Health Ins. -Commissioners 74,002 61,104 12,898 -17.43% 66 57 Hlth. Insurance Run Out -07 Plan 10,000 - 10,000 -100.00% 57 BJBlbb 9-15-10/9-21-10 Final POST Hearing 16 11 A 1 Paae 2 Amended Budaet Budaet Inerease/(Deerease) "I" 2009-2010 2010-2011 09-10 vs, 10-11 Ine/Dee 68 Post Employment Health Plan 106.000 189 000 84,000 80.00% 68 69 Worker's Compensation 672.897 348.466 (3244311 -48.21% 69 60 Worker's Como.-Prev. 33,094 33,011 (83) -0.26% 60 81 Retirement-FRS 1.131.719 1,224 964 93 236 8.24% 81 62 Retirement-FRS-Prev. 56.229 56,229 - 0.00% 62 63 Retirement-175 1,582,858 2,103,545 520,687 32.90% 63 84 Retirement-17S-Prev. 97.723 163 836 66,113 67.42".4 84 66 Retirement-Commissioners 4,959 5,592 633 12.76% 66 66 RetiremenU Hlth Ins - Fire Chief 25.364 (25,3641 -100.00% 68 67 Unemplovment Insurance 36.491 84,000 27 609 76.39% 87 68 EmDloyee Physicals 117,882 45,000 (72,8821 -61.83% 68 69 Retirement Recognition 1.000 2,000 1,000 100.00% 69 Total Pers. Servo 22,649,969 21,181,696 (1,488,273) -6.48% Ooeratlna EXDendltures 80 BIda., Liability & Auto Insurance 377,904 300 000 (77 904 -20.61% 80 81 Communications 16.000 10,300 (4 700 -31.33% 81 82 Teleohone 178.500 168,300 (10,200 -5.71% 82 83 Utilities 212,584 210,000 (2,684 -1.22% 83 Maintenance - 84 Vehicle Maint 342.500 350,000 7600 2.19% 84 85 BI IQ. Maint. 232,516 223,000 9516 -4.09% 85 88 BI Ia. Maint.-St. 40 7,400 2,000 6400 -72.97% 86 87 Blc IQ. Maint.-St. 42 9.200 2000 7,200 -78.26% 87 88 Blc Ia. Maint.-St. 43 4.000 4,000 - 0.00% 88 89 Blc k:l. Maint.-St. 44 6,000 7,000 1,000 16.87% 89 90 Blc Ia. Maint.-St. 45 19.000 10,000 (9 0001 -47.37% 90 91 Blc Ia. Maint.-St. 46 1.300 1,500 200 15.31r.4 91 92 Blc Ia. Maint.-St. 47 2,700 2,300 (4001 -14.81% 92 93 Bk Ia. Maint-Shoolloaistices 1.500 15,000 13,500 900.00% 93 EaulDment Maintenance - 94 EQuip.Repair & Maint.-Fire 36,500 25,000 (11 500 -31.61% 94 95 EQuiD. Maint. - SCBA 4.150 4,000 (150 -3.61% 95 96 EQuip. Maint.-Nozzle 1.600 1,500 (100 -6.26% 96 97 Comouter Maintenance 107,966 70,916 (37,060 -34.32% 97 98 HYdrant Maintenance & ReDair 143,000 90,000 (53,000 -37.06% 98 SUD lies - 99 ALSlEmeraency Medical Sup.lServ. 84,989 58,800 (28,389 -33.40% 99 100 Office SUDDlies 35.000 25,000 (10,000 -28.57% 100 101 Office SuPPlies-Prevention 6,000 2,000 4,000 -66.67% 101 102 Protective Gear 33,950 30,000 3,950 -11.63% 102 103 Uniforms 44.500 40.000 4,600 -10.11% 103 104 Humca~EmeraencySupplies - 5,000 5,000 104 106 Station SuoDlies 27,900 31,000 3,100 11.11% 105 EauIDment-Non. Capital - 106 Office EQuipment 40,000 40,000 - 0.00% 106 107 Office EQuipment-Prevention 2,360 2,000 (350l -14.89% 107 108 Fire EQuipment 61,000 55,000 (6.000) -9.84% 108 109 Shop EQuipment & Supplies 6,000 7,000 2,000 40.00% 109 110 WarehouselLoaistics Suoplies/EQ 1,100 1,000 (iDOl -9.09% 110 Professional & other fees - 111 Professional 280,000 235,000 (45,OOOl -16.07% 111 112 Pro"""rN A"""raiser's Fees 208,865 208,865 - 0.00% 112 113 Collector's Fees 483 778 439,424 (44.364 -9.17% 113 114 Auditor 80,000 65,000 (15,0001 -18.76".4 114 Miscellaneous - 115 Water/Sewer Fee-St. 44 5,000 6,000 - 0.00% 116 BJBlbb 9-15-1019-21-10 2 Final POST Hearing 16 ,~ 1 A 1 Amended Budget Budget Increase/(Decrease) % Page 3 2009-2010 2010-2011 09-10 vs, 10-11 Inc/Dec 116 Travel & Per Diem 46,225 10,000 (36,225 -78.37% 116 117 PIO 3,500 3,000 (500 -14.29% 117 118 PEO 24,100 24,000 (100 -0.41% 118 119 Vehicle Fuel/Oil 300,000 250,000 (50,000 -16.67% 119 Training and Education Courses and 120 Proarams 106,575 89,600 (16,975 -15.93% 120 122 Trainina Supplies/Equipment 32,800 16,000 (16,800 -51.22% 122 123 Miscellaneous 25,000 10,000 (15,000 -60.000,4 123 124 Subscription/Dues 8,010 5,600 (2,410 -30.09% 124 126 Subscription/Dues-Prevention 588 300 (288 -48.98% 125 126 PETC - 126 127 leaal Advertisements 9,000 6,000 3,000 -33.33% 127 128 Dive Team 8,300 5,000 3,300 -39.76% 128 129 Fire Prevention Materials & Supplies 13,280 5,000 8,280 -62.36% 129 130 Haz Mat 5,000 4,000 1,000 -20.00% 130 131 Technical Rescue 4,350 4,000 (350 -8.05% 131 132 Boat Team 5,500 5,500 - 0.00% 132 133 CERT Team 6,000 4,500 (1,500) -25.00% 133 134 Peer Fitness 500 100 (400 -80.00% 134 135 K-9 Search & Rescue - - 135 136 Honor Guard 1,500 ( 1,500) -100.00% 137 SOS Proaram - 137 138 Contingencies - 138 Total Op. Exp. 50,000 50,000 - 0.00% 3,752,979 3 237,304 (516 676 -13.74% Capital Outlav 160 Station Improvements & Equip, 275,000 15,000 (260,000 -94.55% 160 161 Fire and Rescue Equip, 25,000 20,000 (5 000 -20.00% 161 162 Protective Gear 30,000 15,000 (15,000 -50.00% 162 163 Medical Equipment - - 163 164 Communication Equip - 5,000 5,000 164 165 Office Equip 2,500 - (2,500) -100.00% 165 166 Computers 33 000 79 000 46,000 139.39% 168 167 TRT - - 167 168 Boat Team - - 168 169 Training Equipment 20,000 - (20,000) -100.00% 169 170 Vehicle Purchase - - - 170 171 Shop Equipment 2,000 4,000 2,000 100.00% 171 172 logisticslWarehouse - - 172 173 HazMat Team 5,000 - (5,000 -100.00% 173 174 Fire Apparatus - - 174 175 Dive Team 4,000 - (4,000) -100.00% 175 176 Fire Prevention - 176 177 - 178 land - - - 176 Total Capital Outlay 396,500 138,000 (258,500 -65.20-.4 - TOTAL EXPENSES 26,799,448 24,557,000 (2,242,448) -8.37% Prior Year Fund Balance 14,795,829 12.813,759 Total Income 24,817,378 22,512,885 Total Expenses (26,799,448) (24,557,000) $2 Million Reserves Total Cash Reserve 12,813,759 10,769,644 Used BJBlbb 9-15-10/9-21-10 3 Final POST Hearing 16 11 A 1 Amended Budget Budget Page 4 2009-2010 2010-2011 CUMMULATIVE RESERVES: Undesianated Reserve 201012011 Expenses - Ocl. - Dec. 6,600 000 6,600,000 10-11/11-12 Excess - Expenses over Revenue 3,400,000 2,000,000 11-12/12-13 Expenses 1,022,822 1,838,744 Desinnated-ALS Eauipment 250,000 250,000 Designated-Emerg. Res. 500,000 . Designated-Fire Apparatus 960,037 - Desinnated-SCBA Replacement 160,000 160000 Designated-51. #46 Improvements 20,900 20,900 12,813,769 10,769,644 $2 Million Reserves used BJBlbb 9-15-1019-21-10 4 Final POST Hearing 16 J lA 1 INCOME DETAIL The District's Enabling Act grants the Board of Fire Commissioners the authority to assess a levy on property owners for fire protection service. The Collier County Property Tax Appraiser provides the appraised taxable value of all of the property within the District's boundaries. That estimated value is transmitted to the District via Form DR-420, which the District usually receives in late June prior to the October beginning of a new fiscal year. The Board of Fire Commissioners establishes the millage rate, or taxing rate, up to the maximum allowable by the District's Enabling Act (1 Mil, or $1.00 for every $1.000 of appraised property value). This taxing rate is tentatively adopoted at the Tentative Budget Hearing, and finalized with the adoption of the final budget at the Final Budget Hearing. Both of these hearings are held in September. Ad Valorem revenue represents 95% of the District's total annual revenue, with the balance of revenue consisting of interest, cell tower and station rentals, and various fees identified below. The budget assumes the District will receive 95% of the total possible Ad Valorem assessed. The taxable property value for the fiscal year 2010-2011 reflects a substantial decrease in the District's property value. This decrease in property value translates to a substantial decrease in Ad Valorem revenue. Unlike a County or City. the District cannot increase its millage rate to compensate for a reduction in property value in order to generate the same revenue as was generated in the 2009-2010 fiscal year. Therefore, even with the levy of the maximum millage rate (1 Mil), the Ad Valorem revenue reflected in the General Fund Budget represents a reduction of 9.23 percent. This is the third consecutive year the District's property value has decreased. The cumulative effect of the decline in property value over the last three years is a reduction in Ad Valorem revenue of 21 %. According to the Collier County Tax Appraiser's Certification of Taxable Value dated June 28,2010 the Gross Taxable Value of the property in the District reflects a decrease in value of 8.6% as compared to the District's final adjusted property value in 2009. When new development is subtracted from the 2010 value. the percentage of decrease in value is even greater at 10.5%. Historically, the District's property value has increased from year to year between 9% and 15%. This reduction in value, combined with a cap on the maximum millage rate contained within the District's Enabling Act, results in a decrease in revenue of more than 9%, even with the 1.00 millage rate adopted. BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 Final POST Hearing 001-3110-001-000. 002-000. 003-000 AD VALOREM - BUDGET LINE 1 Gross Taxable Value Per Form DR-420 $ x $ 23,023,046,549 95% 21,871,894 Millage Rate - 1.00 Mil 1.00 21,871,894.00 lAd Valorem Revenue -10-11 (1.00 Mil) $ 21,871,894 I 109-10 Budget Amount: $24,038,878 Decrease In Ad Valorem Revenue as compared to 2009-2010: $ 2,166,984 BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 2 16 J 1 Final POST Hearing A-I 16 11 A 1 001-3610-101-000.102-000.104-000 INTEREST INCOME - BUDGET LINES 3. 4 AND 5 Because Interest Income varies depending upon the national financial climate, an estimate has been made using an average of the last 4 years' receipts, recognizing upward or downward trends for the purpose of budgeting general interest. CD Interest revenue estimate is based on the District's current Certificates of Deposit which will mature during the 2010-2011 fiscal year, adding in estimates for interest generated by additional certificates of deposit purchased during the 10-11 fiscal year. Average receipts over the last 4 years were also reviewed to arrive at an interest rate estimate. Anticipated interest income for the 2010-2011 fiscal year represents a decrease of 25% as compared to the prior year's revenue. This decrease is based on actual receipts in 2009-2010 and funds invested in certificates of deposit which mature during the 2010-2011 year. Amended Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 Collier County Ad Valorem Interest General Interest CD Interest $ $ $ - $ 130,000 $ 250,000 $ 132,974 150,000 I TOTAL 1$ 380,000 I $ 282,974 I BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 3 Final POST Hearing 16 , 1.4 1 001-3420-903-000.904-000. 905-000.906-000.908-000.909-000.912-000. 913-000. 915-000 001-3620-001-000. 002-000.003-001.001-3630-001-000. 001-3660-001-000.002-000 001-3690-902-001. 903-000.903-001. 903-002 OTHER INCOME-BUDGET LINES 7 - 23 Other General Fund Income is comprised of various sources as identified below. For those income sources where no verification is possible, an average of the last 4 years' receipts is used, recognizing upward or downward trends. Hydrant Fees, Occupational License Fees, False Alarm Fees, Time Specific Inspection Fees and Key Box revenue were provided by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Miscellaneous Revenue for 2010-2011 reflects a decrease of 8% as compared to the prior year's budgeted amount. This decrease in budgeted revenue is due to the reduction of anticipated hydrant maintenance fees, flow test fees, reinspection fees, donations and key box replacements. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Flow Test $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Inspection - Thrust Block $ - $ Reinspections $ 500 $ Donations $ 500 $ Occupational License Inspections $ 45,000 $ 35,000 Hydrant Maintenance Fees $ 15,000 $ 2,500 Key Boxes $ 10,030 $ 4,000 Reimburseable Training $ 20,000 $ 5,000 Miscellaneous Income $ 5,000 $ 15,000 Miscellaneous Reimbursements/Refunds $ 135,000 $ 135,000 Cell Tower Rent $ 35,160 $ 51,207 EMS Rental $ 26,310 $ 26,310 Sun Century Rental $ 48,000 $ 36,000 False/Malfunctioning Alarm Fees $ 25,000 $ 25,000 ITOTAL 1$ 368,500 I $ 338,017 I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 4 Final POST Hearing 16 11 A 1 _ 001-3630-001-000 FIREWATCH FEES-BUDGET LINE 6 Firewatch Fees are charged to entities requiring the presence of certified firefighters to perform watch over their fire safety systems in the event of mechanical malfunction, construction or other factors. Special Event Firewatch Fees are charges for the same services performed during a special event, such as a concert or theatrical performance. Projection for Firewatch Fees is computed using an average of the last four years' receipts, recognizing upward or downward trends. Also factored into the estimate is the projected revenue for the current fiscal year, and projections provided by the Fire Marshall. The 2010-2011 budget provides for a decrease in revenue of 33%, as compared to the prior fiscal year. This estimated decrease is based on actual receipts for the 20 fiscal year. I TOTAL Budget 2009-2010 30,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 20,000 I $ BJBIbb 7-15-1018-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 5 Final POST Hearing 1611All INCOME RECAP PROJECTED FUND BALANCE CARRIED FORWARD: Budget Budget Cash Reserve at 9-30-09 and 9-30-10: 2009-2010 2010-2011 Designated $ 14,795,829 $ 12,813,759 Undeslgnated Total at 9-30-09 and 9-30-10 $ 14,795,829 $ 12,813,759 PROJECTED REVENUE -1.00 Mil AD VALOREM TAX REVENUE $ 24,038,878 $ 21,871,894 ESTIMATED INTEREST $ 380,000 $ 282,974 ESTIMATED FIREWATCH FEES $ 30,000 $ 20,000 ESTIMATED OTHER INCOME $ 368,500 $ 338,017 TOTAL INCOME ESTIMATED $ 24,817,378 $ 22,512,885 PROJECTED FUND BALANCE AT 9-30-09 AND 9-30-10 $ 14,795,829 $ 12,813,759 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR 2009-2010 AND 2010-2011 $ 39,613,207 $ 35,326,644 Decrease In Funds Available - 2010-2011 versus 2009-2010 $ 4,286,563 BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 6 Final POST Hearing 16 J 1 A 1 EXPENDITURES Expenditures of the General Fund are categorized as follows: Amended Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Personnel $ 22,649,969 $ 21,181,696 Operating $ 3,752,979 $ 3,237,304 Debt Service $ - $ Capital $ 396,500 $ 138,000 ITotal Expenditures 1$ 26,799,448 I $ 24,557,000 I Personnel related expenditures constitute 86% of the total budgeted expenses for the 2010-2011 fiscal year, as compared to 84% for the 2009-2010 fiscal year. Total personnel expenses for 2010-2011 reflect a decrease of $1,468,273, or 6% as compared to the personnel expenses for the 2009-2010 fiscal year. This decrease is a result of a reduction in health insurance costs due to a reduction in benefits, non-bargaining unit employee position eliminations and the completion of the 2008 Early Retirement Incentive. Additionally, vacated operational positions have not been filled. Operating expenses represent those costs associated with operating and maintaining District facilities and operations. The operating expenses contained within the 2010-2011 budget represent a decrease of $515,675 or 13%, as compared to the 2009-2010 budgeted operating expenses. The District has no debt at October 1, 2010, and does not anticipate incurring any during the course of the 2010-2011 fiscal year. Therefore, there is no required provision for debt service payment. Capital Expenditures provide for the purchase of capital assets, including vehicles, apparatus, computers and equipment that exceed $1,000 in cost and have a useful life of more than one year. The total capital expenditures provided for in the 2010-2011 budget represent a decrease of $258,500 or 65% as compared to the prior year's expenditures. This decrease is due to the elimination of all capital expenditures not identified as immediate priorities of the District. Total budgeted expenditures of the General Fund for the fiscal year 2010-2011 reflect a decrease of $2,242,448, or 8% as compared to total General Fund budgeted expenses for the prior year. BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 7 Final POST Hearing 16/1 Al PERSONNEL EXPENSES STAFF WAGES AND BENEFITS Employee wages represent the largest percentage of the District's personnel, as well as total, expenditures. Projected expenses for the 2010-2011 year are based on the addition of no new positions, and the elimination of the three non-bargaining unit positions which occurred in July of 2010. Pay scales for the 2010-2011 fiscal year reflect no salary increases for both bargaining and non-bargaining unit employee, with the exception of step increases for bargaining unit positions. Due to revenue reductions, no financial provision is made for the performance based increases provided for District Policy in lieu of step increases for non-bargaining unit employees. 001-5220-012-000. 012-002 SALARY - PERSONNEL AND PREVENTION - BUDGET LINES 30 AND 31 ELECTED OFFICIALS Commissioners ITOTAL ELECTED OFFICIALS Budget 2009-2010 5 Budget 2010-2011 5 110-11 5 109-10 5 ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL Fire Chief 1 1 Assistant Chief-Support Operations 0 0 Assistant Chief - Emergency Operations 1 1 Assistant Chief - Administrative Services 1 1 Deputy Chief Operations 0 0 Deputy Chief of Fleet & Equipment 1 1 Deputy Chief of Safety &Training 1 1 Deputy Chief of Projects & Facilities Mgmt. 1 1 Deputy Chief of Medical Services & Com. ReI. 1 1 Officer Manager 1 0 Public Information Officer* 1 1 HR Generalist 1 1 Accounts Payable/Receivable Accountant 1 1 Administrative Assistants 3 2 Data Entry Clerk 0 0 Maintenance Worker 1 1 Custodian 1 0 Fleet Mechanics 1 1 Fleet Technician 1 1 Computer Network Administrator 1 1 Part-Time Data Base Technician 0 0 ITOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL I 09-10 19 110-11 16 I Note: Public Information Officer Hours Reduced to 30/week, but still considered full-time BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 8 Final POST Hearing 16 , 1 A 1 Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 FIRE PREVENTION Fire Marshal Deputy Fire Marshals Fire Inspectors Inspector/Public Education Administative Assistants ITOTAL FIRE PREVENTION PERSONNEL 1 2 9 1 2 I 09-10 15 1 2 9 1 2 110-11 15 TRAINING Battalion Commander of Training 1 1 ITOTAL TRAINING I 09-10 1 110-11 1 (Plus 3 Captains on Shift Reflected Below) SPECIAL OPERATIONS Battalion Chief of Facilities 1 1 ITOTAL SPECIAL OPERATIONS I 09-10 1 110-11 1 EMS COORDINATOR Captain 1 1 ITOTAL EMS COORDINATOR I 09-10 1 110-11 1 LOGISTICS Captain 1 1 ITOTAL LOGISTICS 1 09-10 1 110-11 1 OPERATIONS Battalion Chiefs 3 3 Captains 10 10 Lieutenants 20 20 Engineers 30 33 Firefi hters 53 45 TOTAL SHIFT PERSONNEL 09-10 116 10-11 111 Note: Budgetary provision made for employees paid under Early Retirement Incentive BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 9 Final POST Hearing ITOTAL PERSONNEL GENERAL FUND $ PREVENTION $ INSPECTION (See Insp. Fee Fund Budget) $ ITOTAL SALARIES 1$ BJBJbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 16 Pl Al TOTAL EMPLOYEES/ELECTED OFFICIALS: Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Sworn FF 140 Sworn FF Civilian 14 Civilian 11 Commissioners 5 Commissioners 5 Full Time Emp. 154 Part Time -0- Commissioners 5 Full Time Emp. 146 Part Time -0- Commissioners 5 I 09-10 159 110-11 151 11,533,928 $ 646,992 $ 564,946 $ 12,745,866 1$ 10,731,050 775,358 439,989 11,946,397 I 10 Final POST Hearing 16 J 1\ 1 ~ 001-5220-011-000 BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS-SALARIES-BUDGET LINE 32 The Board of Fire Commissioners is a five-member Board elected by the voters residing in the District. Each Commissioner must be a resident of the District, and serves a four year term. The Board holds a monthly public meeting the second Thursday of each month to set policy, approve budgetary actions and provide direction and guidance to staff. Additionally, the Board conducts special meetings, workshops and hearings as needed throughout the year. The annual salary for Commissioners is established by Florida Statute, and has remained constant since 1996. Position Chairman Vice-Chairman SecretaryfTreasurer Commissioner Commissioner $ $ $ $ $ Budget 2009-2010 Annual Salary 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Budget 2010-2011 Annual Salarv $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 I Total $ 30,000 I $ 30,000 I BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS-OTHER BENEFITS -BUDGET LINES 56 AND 66 Florida Statute establishes the independent fire district's responsibility to provide benefits for elected officials. 001-6220-023-005 Health and Dental Ins. Annual Cost: 1 Commissioners-Self/Spouse 2 Commissioners - Family 2 Commissioner-Self Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 $ 16,247 $ 14,141 $ 41,204 $ 36,814 $ 16,500 $ 10,098 $ 73,951 $ 61,053 Note: Annual Cost has not yet been specifically identified for family versus individual coverage. Life Ins. Annual Cost: 5 Commissioners - $51.00 ITotal-Health/DentallLife $ $ 51 $ 74,002 $ 51 61,1041 BJBIbb 7-15-1018-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 11 Final POST Hearing 16 b1 Ai 001-5220-022-008 RETIREMENT - COMMISSIONERS - BUDGET LINE 65 As of June 1, 2003, all elected officials participate in the Florida Retirement System. The Division of Retirement requires that all contributions to this plan be made by the employer. Estimated contribution requirements for the 2010-2011 budget are arrived at by multiplying the budgeted salary for the Commissioners by the Elected Officials contribution rate established by the Division of Retirement. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 12 Final POST Hearing 16 , lA 1 001-5220-016-015-010 ON CAll PAY - BUDGET LINE 33 Members of the collective bargaining unit who are assigned to an on call status received $1.50 per hour for all hours on call per the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Estimated costs are based on current year actual costs. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 I TOTAL 1$ 25,000 1 $ 10,000 I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 13 Final POST Hearing 16 I tl Al 001-5220-015-000. 002 PROFESSIONAL PAY-BUDGET LINES 34 & 35 Professional Pay is compensation to those employees who maintain an additional qualification to perform other emergency or job related responsibilities, and include the following categories establishing the area of expertise, the certfication and the annual amount provided. The compensation amount is established via the Collective Bargaining Agreement for bargaining unit employees. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 EMS Degree $ 31,200 $ 21,200 Fire Degree $ 76,800 $ 76,800 Bachellor's Degree $ 3,600 $ 3,600 Fire Instructor/Fire Officer $ 4,600 $ 3,900 Fire Investigator/Fire Inspector $ 4,800 $ 4,700 MAKO Tech $ 3,360 $ 3,360 Nozzle Tech $ 1,200 $ 1,200 Team Leaders $ 14,400 $ 14,400 Asst. Team Leaders $ 10,560 $ 10,560 New Certifications, Including FIELD TRAINING OFFICERS $ 31 ,400 $ 9,600 I TOTAL 1$ 181,920 I $ 144,400 I GENERAL $ 165,120 $ 130,000 PREVENTION $ 4,800 $ 4,800 INSPECTION FEE FUND (See Insp. Fee Fnd. Bud) $ 12,000 $ 9,600 I TOTAL 1$ 181,920 I $ 144,400 I BJBIbb 7-15-1018-27-1019-13-1019-21-10 14 Final POST Hearing 16 f 1 A 1 001-5220-014-000.001.002.003.004.005.006. 007 008 OVERTIME-BUDGET LINES 37 - 45 Overtime is paid to meet minimum manning shift requirements, when qualified replacement personnel are required to fill position vacancies caused by illness, vacation, education, and kelly days, and in the event of a District wide emergency. Overtime includes regular overtime, firewatch, special teams, fire prevention, beach patrol, paramedic training, instructors for District training and the CERT Team, administration, and reimbursable training by the State or other agencies. The 2010-2011 budget reflects a detailed breakdown of operational, administration and fire prevention overtime. Overtime-Operations Call Back Held Over On Call Safety Officer Radio Repair & Maintenance Staffing PMD Min. Staffing Air Compressor Repair Nozzle Repair General Operations (Including Staffing Maintenance) ITOTAL - OVERTIME - OPERATIONS Budget 2009-2010 7,000 $ 10,500 $ 2,000 $ 7,000 $ 2,000 $ 5,000 $ 2,000 $ 1 ,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1$ 163,500 $ 200,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 7,000 10,500 2,000 7,000 152,000 5,000 2,000 1,000 213,500 400,000 I ITOTAL - OVERTIME - PREVENTION 1$ 23,000 I $ 18,000 I Overtime-Beach Patrol $ 1,000 $ ITOTAL - OVERTIME - BEACH PATROL 1$ 1,000 I $ - I Overtime-Firewatch ITOTAL - OVERTIME - FIREWATCH 1$ 30,000 I $ 30,000 I ITOTAL - OVERTIME - ADMINISTRATION 6,000 I $ 1,000 I 1$ BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 15 Final POST Hearing 16 11 fi Overtime-Training Training (Instructors) CERT (Instructors) ITOTAL - OVERTIME - TRAINING $ $ 1$ Budget 2009-2010 27,000 $ 3,000 $ 30,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 -I Overtime-Special Teams Dive Team - 28 Hours Per Contract HazMat - 36 Hours Per Contract TRT - 60 Hours Per Contract Boat Team - 21 Hours Per Contract $ 35,053 $ 37.466 $ 59,024 $ 61,996 $ 82.485 $ 93,261 $ 17 ,160 $ 15,247 1$ 193,722 I $ 207,970 , 'TOTAL Overtime-Paramedic Training The financial provision for paramedic overtime training will provide for required traininng and the resulting overtime for the District's paramedics. I TOTAL $ 1$ 50,000 $ 50,000 I $ -, Overtime-Reimburseable Training This budget line provides for the payment of overtime for District instructors and members for training which is reimburseable from state or federal funds. I TOTAL $ 1$ 20,000 $ 20,000 I $ 1,000 1,0001 BJBIbb 7-15-1018-27-1019-13-1019-21-10 16 Final POST Hearing 16 11 AI 001-5220-015-005 TRAINING BONUS-BUDGET LINE 46 Members of the Dive Rescue Team, Technical Rescue Team, Hazmat Team, and Boat Rescue Team who complete 70% of their training receive an annual bonus of $300 each, paid September 30, paid on September 30, per the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Additionally, the Collective Bargaining Agreement provides for one time bonus payments for attaining certain certifications. Budget 2009-2010 HazMat (34 Members) TRT (29 Members) Boat Rescue (15 Members) Dive Rescue (25 Members) Bonuses for State Certifications $ $ $ $ $ 10,200 $ 8,700 $ 4,500 $ 7,500 $ 14,100 $ Budget 2010-2011 10,200 8,700 4,500 7,500 14,100 I TOTAL 45,000 I $ 45,000 I 1$ 001-5220-015-001 EMPLOYEE HOLIDAY PAY-BUDGET LINE 36 Holiday pay is paid to bargaining unit personnel on shift pursuant to the terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Each shift employees is paid for 11 holidays, 8 hours per holiday, or a total of 88 hours. The paid holidays consisting of New Year's Day, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, President's Day, Memorial Day, July 4th, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, Day After Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. Payment is made September 30 annually. $ 1$ Budget 2009-2010 288,748 $ 288,7481 $ ITOTAL BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 17 Budget 2010-2011 288,748 288.7481 Final POST Hearing 001-5220-015-003. 006 EMPLOYEE SICK TIME PAYOUT-BUDGET LINES 48 & 49 16 11 A 1 1 Pursuant to the terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement and Section 10 of District Policies, employees are paid for earned, unused sick time as of September 30 of each fiscal year at 100% of their hourly rate. Employees have the option of receiving payment for all unused sick time, or transferring a portion of the time to personal time for future use. The number of hours which may be transferred to an employee's personal time bank, as well as the maximum accrual of personal time. is defined in the Collective Bargaining Agreement and Section 10 of District Policies. For budgeting purposes, 65 percent of the maximum payout for all employees is used. GENERAL FUND $ PREVENTION $ Budget 2009-2010 421,978 $ 20,648 $ INSPECTION (See Insp. Fee Fund Budget) $ I TOTAL I $ 17,234 $ 459,860 I $ 001-5220-015-004 EMPLOYEE VACATION PAYOUT-BUDGET LINE 47 Budget 2010-2011 421,978 20,648 17,234 459,860 I Upon separation from the District or upon entering the Florida Retirement System DROP program, employees are paid for their accrued, earned unused vacation hours (up to a maximum of 500 hours) at their hourly rate, pursuant to the Collective Bargaining Agreement and District Policies. Employees accepting the Early Retirement Incentive are entitled to vacation pay on final payment. I TOTAL $ 1$ Budget 2009-2010 50,000 $ 50,000 I $ BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 18 Budget 2010-2011 175,000 175,000 I Final POST Hearing 16 11 Al 001-5220-022-000.002. 003.004. 001-5220-022-005 RETIREMENT-BUDGET LINES 61 - 66 The employees of the District participate in one of two retirement plans - the Chapter 175 Firefighters' Pension Plan. or the Florida Retirement System. All certified firefighters hired prior to January 1, 1996, and all elected officials and administrative staff participate in the Florida Retirement System (FRS). except for the Fire Chief. Pursuant to requirements of the Division of Retirement, all contributions to this plan must be made by the employer. Contribution rates are established by the Division of Retirement, and are effective for their fiscal year, which runs from July 1 to June 30. Estimated budgeted costs are determined by multiplying anticipated wages of participating employees by the appropriate contribution rate for those employees participating in the Florida Retirement System (FRS) and by multiplying wages by the contribution rate identified by the Pension Plan actuary for those employees participating in the Chapter 175 Firefighters' Pension. Florida Retirement System FRS Retirement Rates Special Risk - 23.25% DROP - 12.25% Regular Rate - 10.77% Elected Officials - 18.64% Total Participants - 59 Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 $ 1,057,099 $ 1,133,270 $ 37,813 $ 74,620 $ 53,871 See Budget Line #57 See Budget Line #57 GENERAL FUND PREVENTION INSPECTION FUND (See Insp. Fee Fund Budget) I TOTAL $ $ 1,131,719 $ 56,229 $ 1,224,954 56,229 $ 1$ - $ 1,187,9481 $ 1,281,1831 BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 19 Final POST Hearing 16 11 Al Chapter 175 Firefighters' Pension All firefighters hired by the District after January 1, 1996 participate in the Chapter 175 Firefighters' Pension Plan. Contributions to the plan are funded partially by State Premium Tax Funds, with the balance paid by the District. Currently, the District may utilize up to $1.746 million annually of those state funds to offset the District's required contribution, as determined by an annual actuarial study prepared on behalf of the Pension Plan's Board of Trustees. All State Premium Tax Funds received in excess of the $1.746 million must be used to fund extra benefits. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 Contribution Rate Per Actuary - 28.57% Total Participants - 98 GENERAL PREVENTION INSPECTION (See Inspection Fee Fund Budget) I TOTAL $ $ 1.582,858 $ 97,723 $ 2,103,545 153,836 $ 1$ - $ 1,680,581 I $ 2,257,381 I RETIREMENT/HEALTH INSURANCE - FIRE CHIEF The District's Fire Chief is a participant in the Florida Retirement System. Contribution costs for the Fire Chief are reflected above. I TOTAL $ 1$ Budget 2009-2010 25,364 $ 25,364 I $ Budget 2010-2011 -I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 20 Final POST Hearing 001-5220-021-000.001 SOCIAL SECURITY-BUDGET LINES 50 & 51 161'lAl Employers are required to pay social security taxes at the rate of 6.20% on all wages up to a maximum of $106,800 per employee, and medicare taxes at the rate of 1.45% on all wages paid to employees. For budgetary purposes, the total wages budgeted are multiplied by 6.20% and 1.45% to arrive at the estimated social security contribution for the 2010-2011 fiscal year. GENERAL PREVENTION INSPECTION (See Inspection Fee Fund Budget) I TOTAL Budget 2009-2010 1,038,566 $ 53,201 $ $ $ $ 1$ 44,136 $ 1,135,903 I $ 001-5220-024-000. 001 Budget 2010-2011 954,867 64,644 35,551 1,055,062 I WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE-BUDGET LINES 59 & 60 The District provides worker's compensation insurance coverage for all employees as required by law. One hundred percent of all wages paid are subject to worker's compensation, except for overtime. Only two-thirds of overtime paid is subject to worker's compensation. GENERAL PREVENTION INSPECTION (See Inspection Fee Fund Budget) I TOTAL Budget 2009-2010 672,897 $ 33,094 $ $ $ $ 1$ - $ 705,991 I $ BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 21 Budget 2010-2011 348,466 33,011 381,477 I Final POST Hearing 16 J 1 Al 001-5220-023-001.004 SHORT TERM/LONG TERM DISABILITY-BUDGET LINES 52 & 53 Pursuant to the Collective Bargaining Agreement and District Policies, short term (6 months) and long term disability insurance is provided for all employees, excluding elected officials. All premiums are fully paid by the District. The District self insures short term disability coverage. Wages up to a maximum of $1,200 per week are subject to short and long term disability benefits. Cost estimates for budgetary purposes are based on current rates. GENERAL PREVENTION INSPECTION (See Inspection Fee Fund) $ $ $ Budget 2009-2010 53,524 $ - $ - $ Budget 2010-2011 30,000 16,000 ITOTAL 1$ 53,524 I $ 46,000 I BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-1019-13-1019-21-10 22 Final POST Hearing 16 /1 Al 001-5220-023-000. 003.005 L1FE/DENTAUHEALTH INSURANCE-BUDGET LINES 54 - 56 LIFE INSURANCE Employees ($50,000) Retirees ($5,000) Commissioners ($5,000) $ $ $ Budget 2009-2010 Annual Cost 21,808 135 75 Budget 2010-2011 Annual Cost $ 21,808 $ 135 $ 75 Total-Life Insurance $ 22,018 $ 22,018 HEALTH INSURANCE & DENTAL INSURANCE General Prevention Commissioners Inspection I TOTAL $ $ $ $ 1$ 2,997,142 $ 268,604 $ 74,002 $ - $ 3,339,748 I $ 2,329,000 209,896 61,104 2,600,000 I 001-5220-023-009 HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION - BUDGET LINE 68 In 2007-2008, the District established a Post Employment Health Plan to provide funds for eligible employees' health insurance costs after retirement. The plan is solely employer funded. The District makes an annual contribution of $7,000 per eligible employee. Elgibility is established by Article 21 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement and District Policy Section 14. Current criteria requires an employee to have twenty years of service to be eligible for a District contribution. For those employees with twenty five years of service, a one time election was made to participate in the Post Employment Health Plan or retain the former post retirement benefit of District premium supplementation. The 2010-2011 budgeted amount reflects the District's annual $7,000 for all eligible employees, as well as the possible one time payout for employees eligible to retire. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 I TOTAL 1$ 105,000 I $ 189,000 I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-1019-21-10 23 Final POST Hearing 16 11 '1 t 001-5220-023-002 EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS - BUDGET LINE 68 All personnel employed under the terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement and all sworn employees covered by Section 25.03 of the District Policies are required to undergo an annual physical performed by the District physician consisting of specified criteria. The District pays 100% of the cost. Pursuant to the terms of Section 25.03 of the District Policies, all non-sworn administrative staff have the option of an annual physical, performed by the District's physician. The District pays 100% of the cost of the physical consisting of specified criteria. The District also provides fit for duty and pre-employment physical exams, via the District Physician. The District also pays 100% of these costs. Estimated costs for the 2010-2011 fiscal year are based on the cost for each category of physical exam provided pursuant to the agreement between Physician's Regional Medical Center, Dr. Paul Hobaica and the District. Provision for annual flu shots is also made. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 ITOTAL 1$ 117,882 I $ 45,000 I 001-5220-099-007 RETIREMENT RECOGNITION-BUDGET LINE 69 The 2010-2011 General Fund Budget contains provision for an expenditure of $2,000 to provide retirement recognition acknowledgments pursuant to District Policy. I TOTAL 1$ Budget 2009-2010 1,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 2,000 I 001-5220-025-000 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE -BUDGET LINE 67 The District is self-insured for unemployment claims; that is, the State pays the approved claim based on their criteria and the District is required to reimburse the State for the claim. The 2010- 2011 budget contains provision for compensation for the non-bargaining unit employees laid off in the summer of 2010. I TOTAL 1$ Budget 2009-2010 36,491 I $ Budget 2010-2011 64,000 I BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 24 Final POST Hearing 1611Al OPERA TING EXPENSES 001-5220-045-000 LIABILITY, AUTO AND BUILDING INSURANCE-BUDGET LINE 80 The District maintains general liability, auto, property, accident, sickness and umbrella coverage through VFIS Insurance Company. Cost projections are based on current premiums plus an additional 1 0%, the average increase in premiums over the last four years. I TOTAL 1$ Budget 2009-2010 377 ,904 I $ Budget 2010-2011 300,000 I 001-5220-041-001. 002.100 - 106 COMMUNICATIONS-BUDGET LINE 81 The Communications budgets lines provide for the District's expenditures for the repair and maintenance of all radios. The 2010-2011 budget reflects a decrease of $4,700, or 31% , as compared to the prior year's budget. Budget Budget PARTS/REPAIRS 2009-2010 2010-2011 100 Portable Batteries $ 5,000 $ 2,000 VHF Mobile Radios $ - $ 1,000 Replacement Headsets $ - $ 900 Belt Clips $ - $ Radio Cases $ - $ Chargers $ - $ 900 Headsets for Engineer Portables $ - $ Collar Microphones $ - $ 1,000 3 VHF Mobile Radios $ - $ Repair $ 10,000 $ 4,500 I TOTAL 1$ 15,000 I $ 10,300 I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 25 Final POST Hearing 001-5220-041-000.041-111 -121 TELEPHONE-BUDGET LINE 82 16 I lA 1 The provision for telephone services includes the cost of telephone service for all District facilities, the cell phone contract cost, the cost of the data lines, data cards and telephone maintenace and Repair. Budgeted amounts represent the current year costs of all components, including contracts in effect for data lines and cell phone service. The 2010-2011 budgeted amount represents a decrease of $10,200 or 5% as compared to the prior year budget. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Station 40 $ 4,700 $ 3,100 Station 42 $ 2,800 $ 2,800 Station 43 $ 2,500 $ 2,200 Station 44 $ 4,600 $ 6,900 Station 45 (Includes ethernet connections) $ 49,000 $ 80,000 Station 46 $ 2,800 $ 2,300 Station 47 $ 4,200 $ 2,600 Taylor Road Facility $ 900 $ 2,800 Long Distance Service $ 3,600 $ 2,800 Data Lines (Embarq Contract) $ 52,000 $ 6,800 Cell Phones and Network Access-Apparatus $ 28,800 $ 50,000 Telephone Maintenance/Service $ 7,000 $ 4,000 Data Cards $ 15,600 Miscellaneous (Including Other Locations) $ - $ 2,000 I TOTAL 1$ 178,500 I $ 168,300 I 001-5220-043-000. 001 - 010 UTILITIES-BUDGET LINE 83 As with the provision for telephone services, the amount provided in the utilities budget line is determined by actual current year fiscal expenses. The 2010-2011 budget represents a minor decrease compared to the prior year's budget. Station 40 Station 42 Station 43 Station 44 Station 45 Station 46 Station 47 Taylor Road Nursery Lane Sun Century Oakes Property Misc - Unforseen Costs Due to Vendor Ad.. TOTAL $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Budget 2009-2010 21,600 $ 13,600 $ 21,900 $ 22,700 $ 66,650 $ 24,450 $ 3,050 $ 31,534 $ 4,500 $ - $ 200 $ 2,400 $ 212,584 $ Budget 2010-2011 16,400 13,500 18,600 20,700 70,200 23,850 9,350 28,600 1,500 300 7,000 210,000 BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 26 Final POST Hearing 16 J 1 Al 001-5220-046-009.046-100 -103 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR-BUDGET LINE 84 The District operates a vehicle and apparatus maintenance facility and employs two full time mechanics to service the fleet. The purchase of parts to accomplish these repairs, as well as other anticipated maintenance items and services, excluding fuel and oil, are reflected in this expense line. Additionally, the cost for external repair services is included to provide for services which cannot be performed at our facility . The 2010-2011 amount budgeted reflects an increase of $7,500 or 2%. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Outside Repairs-Apparatus $ 95,000 $ 75,000 Apparatus Parts $ 162,500 $ 190,000 Annual Inspection of Ladders, Aerials and Pumps $ 6,500 $ 5,500 Rebuild Engine - L40 $ 15,000 $ Rebuild Transmission - E42 $ 8,500 $ 8,500 Staff Vehicle Maintenance $ 55,000 $ 71,000 ITotal $ 342,500 $ 350,000 I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-1019-21-10 27 Final POST Hearing 001-5220-046-010.013. 146-101 - 224 BUilDING MAINTENANCE-GENERAL-BUDGET LINE 85 16 , lA 1 The District operates and maintains 7 fire stations, administrative and fire prevention headquarters, and a shop/maintenance facility. Contained within Budget Line 65 - Building Maintenance - General are provisions for routine repair and maintenance items and services for all of the District's facilities. Service needs vary from weekly, monthly and annually, to an as needed basis. Some service or maintenance/repair items cannot accurately be assigned to a specific station. It is difficult to anticipate which station might need glass replaced, for example, or overhead door repair. Therefore, this line provides for repair and maintenance of items by type of service or repair, rather than by location of facility. The amount budgeted in 2010-2011 reflects a decrease of $9,516 or 4% as compared to the the prior year's budget. Outside Maintenance-All Facilities Lawn Service - (Inc. sprinklerslweed/fert.) Landscape Maintenance Bay Door Service and Repair Glass Replacement Lift Station Service & Repair Pest Control Fuel Pump Service & Repair Generator Repairs and Service Fuel Tank Repair/Service Lake Maintenance and Repair (St. 45) Lawn Sprinkler Repair Outdoor Electric Repair & Service Miscellaneous Outside Repairs Replace AlC Comp/Handler Training Tower Maintenance Vacant Property Maintenance Exotic Vegetation Removal Total-Outslde BJBJbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 Budget 2009-2010 $ 66,400 $ $ 7,000 $ $ 10,000 $ $ 1,000 $ $ 5,500 $ $ 4,500 $ $ 2,000 $ $ 7,500 $ $ 5,000 $ $ 3,000 $ $ 3,000 $ $ 3,400 $ $ 18,000 $ $ 9,000 $ Inc. In Training Budget $ $ 4,000 $ $ 7,000 $ $ 156,300 $ 28 Budget 2010-2011 50,000 6,000 10,000 1,000 5,500 4,500 2,000 8,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 12,000 9,000 8,000 6,000 5,000 139,000 Final POST Hearing 16 I 1 Ai Inside Maintenance-All Facilities Electrical Repairs and Service $ Plumbing Repairs and Service $ AlC and Ice Machine Maintenance Contract $ AlC and Ice Machine Unexpected Repairs $ Air Conditioning-Duct Repairllnspection/Clg. $ Appliance Repair and Service $ Fire Alarm Testing/Monitoring $ Fire Alarm Repairs and Service $ Fire Sprinkler Testing $ Fire Sprinkler Repairs and Service $ Hood/Extinguisher Testing $ Hood/Extinguisher Repairs and Service $ CarpetlFurniture Cleaning $ Miscellaneous Inside Repairs $ Maintenance Tools and Equipment $ Maintenance Contract - Fitness Equipment $ General Maintenance Supplies $ Station Audio and Visual Equipment $ Carpet/Furniture Replacement (Non-Capital) $ Total-lnslde Maintenance $ 6,000 $ 5,000 $ 14,000 $ 4,000 $ 10,000 $ 2,000 $ 4,226 $ 2,000 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,300 $ 1,500 $ 3,000 $ 6,000 $ 2,000 $ 1,690 $ 5,000 $ 2,500 $ - $ 76,216 $ 10,000 4,000 12,000 6,000 5,000 3,000 4,500 2,000 2,600 2,500 2,300 1,000 2,000 16,600 2,000 3,500 4,000 1,000 84,000 I TOTAL 1$ 232,516 I $ 223,000 I The following budget lines represent expenditure amounts for individual stations. The 2010-2011 budget lines for indvidual stations reflect specific items which need to be purchased as identified by Support Services and a general amount for repair and maintenace, since these items cannot always be identified when the budget is created. 001-5220-046-300. 301 BUILDING MAINTENANCE-STATION #40-BUDGET LINE 86 Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Station Repair and Maintenance $ 750 $ 2,000 Commercial Grade Microwave $ - $ Replace FAX Machine $ 150 $ Repair Commercial Stove $ 700 $ Replace Grill (Including Install) $ 1,300 $ Replace 6 Recliners $ 4,500 $ I TOTAL 1$ 7,400 I $ 2,000 I BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 29 Final POST Hearing 001-5220-046-302, 303 1611Al' BUILDING MAINTENANCE - STATION #42-BUDGET LINE 87 Station Repair and Maintenance Install Shower Doors, Tile Wall & Dura Rock Clean Tile 20 AMP Circuit for Treadmill Bay Floor Repair Replacement Items/Purchases $ $ $ $ $ $ Budget 2009-2010 1,000 $ 2,500 $ 1,200 $ 500 $ 4,000 $ - $ 9,200 I $ I TOTAL 1$ 001-5220-046-304. 305. 306 Budget 2010-2011 2,000 2,000 I BUILDING MAINTENANCE - STATION #43-BUDGET LINE 88 Station Repair and Maintenance $ Marquee Repair Parking Lot Reseal and Striping $ Electrical and Data - Un. Computer workstation $ I TOTAL 001-5220-046-307. 308 1$ Budget 2009-2010 1,500 $ $ 2,500 $ - $ 4,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 1,500 1,000 1,500 4,000 I BUILDING MAINTENANCE-STATION #44-BUDGET LINE 89 Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 1,700 $ 2,000 $ 5,000 3,500 $ 300 $ 500 $ - $ Station Repair and Maintenance Laminate Floor in Day Room & Radio Room Air Quality/Mold Testing Flag Pole Light Cabinet Hardware Replacement Replacement Items/Purchases $ $ $ $ $ I TOTAL 7,000 I BJBIbb 7-15-1018-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 1$ 6,000 I $ 30 Final POST Hearing 16 r 1 A,! 001-5220-046-309. 310 BUILDING MAINTENANCE - STATION #45-BUDGET LINE 90 Station Repair and Maintenance Duct Work Dining Table Replacement Beds (XL Mattress/Box Springs) Strip and Seal Parking Lot Air Quality/Mold Testing Install Laminate Floor - Bunk Rooms Replacement Items/Purchases I TOTAL $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1$ Budget 2009-2010 4,500 $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ - $ 3,500 $ 10,000 $ - $ 19,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 5,500 4,500 10,000 I 001-5220-046-311. 312 BUILDING MAINTENANCE - STATION #46-BUDGET LINE 91 Station Repair and Maintenance Hose Bib Relocation Replacement Items/Purchases Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 $ 1,000 $ 1,500 $ 300 $ $ - $ 1$ 1,300 I $ 1,500 I I TOTAL 001-5220-046-313,314 BUILDING MAINTENANCE - STATION #47-BUDGET LINE 92 Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Station Repair and Maintenance $ 1,000 $ 2,300 Microwave $ - $ Office Chairs $ - $ Vacuum $ 200 $ Replacement Grill $ 900 $ Replacement Items/Purchases $ 600 $ ITOTAL 1$ 2,700 1$ 2,300 I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 31 Final POST Hearing 001-5220-046-315 16 11\ 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE - SUPPORT SERVICES-BUDGET LINE 93 Miscellaneous Maintenance Supplies Fleet Area Bay Lights Washer & Dryer - Mechanics ITOTAL $ Budget 2009-2010 1,500 $ $ $ 1,500 I $ 1$ EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE Budget 2010-2011 4,700 9,500 800 16,000 I The cost provisions for the repair and maintenance of fire, SCBA Compressor (formerly referred to by the brand name "MAKO"), fire equipment, computer equipment, and maintenance of the fire hydrants in the District are contained in the budget lines below. 001-5220-046-006. 600. 700 FIRE EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE-BUDGET LINE 94 Scott Airpack Repairs & Annual Flow Test Hurst Equipment Repair & Maintenance Normal Repair & Maintenance of Tools/Equip. $ $ $ Budget 2009-2010 12,000 $ 4,500 $ 20,000 $ Budget 2010-2011 12,000 4,200 8,800 I TOTAL 25,000 I 001-5220-046-007 1$ 36,500 I $ SCBA COMPRESSOR REPAIRS-BUDGET LINE 95 Quarterly Maintenance Program Misc. Parts and Repairs Budget 2009-2010 $ $ 2,150 $ 2,000 $ Budget 2010-2011 3,300 700 ITOTAL 4,000 I BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 1$ 4,150 I $ 32 Final POST Hearing 16 i 1 A 1 001-5220-046-008 NOZZLE REPAIR & REPLACEMENT-BUDGET LINE 96 Budget Budget 2009-2010 2009-2010 Nozzle Repair Parts $ 1,600 $ 1,500 I TOTAL 1$ 1,600 I $ 1,500 I 001-5220-051-002. 100 - 105 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE-BUDGET LINE 97 The computer maintenance budget provides for the purchase of software, regardless of the cost since software is not a fixed asset, hardware costing less than $1,000, maintenance and updates for existing software and new software. The 2010-2011 budgeted total reflects a decrease of $37,050, or 34%, largely due to the inclusion last year for a Red Alert upgrade. Budget Budget ITEM 2009-2010 2010-2011 One Step Software Maintenance (Prevention) $ 4,500 $ 4,500 Motorola Maint. (Printrak & Premier MDC) $ 6,015 $ 6,015 Symantec Anti-Virus Software $ 2,500 $ Red Alert Maintenance $ 7,000 $ 7,000 Communication Annual Software Renewal $ 700 $ 700 Tape Backup Maintenance $ 1,000 $ Website Hosting $ 250 $ 100 Backup Parts & Verizon Repeaters(Computers in Apparatus) $ 2,000 $ 8,600 Email Scrubbing Annual Renewal (Postini) $ 2,600 $ 2,600 EMS 2000 Software Maintenance $ 5,000 $ GIS Anno Mapping Upgrade/Maint. $ 7,500 $ 7,500 Astaro Firewall Maintenance $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Emergency Response Mapping Maintenance $ - $ ARCH Is $ 1 ,400 $ 1,400 Red Alert Upgrade/Staffing Software $ 15,000 $ Cummings Software-Shop $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Laptop Memory Installation-Fire Prevention $ - $ Computer Workstation Replacements $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Software Licenses $ 2,500 $ 2,500 Great Plains Maintenance $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Total $ 82,965 $ 65,915 Hardware Miscellaneous Hardware & Software $ 25,000 $ 5,000 I TOTAL 1$ 107,965 I $ 70,9151 BJBIbb 7-15-1018-27-1019-13-1019-21-10 33 Final POST Hearing 16 I f!. lp<i/ 001-5220-046-011. 800 HYDRANT MAINTENANCE-BUDGET LINE 98 The estimated cost for hydrant maintenance services performed by the District is based on current year actual cost and an analysis of the cost over the last four years. The amount provided for in the 2010-20110 fiscal year includes payment to Collier County for the maintenance and ownership of all hydrants in the District located in front of backflow devices on the County's water lines. This payment is the first of three to span over the next three fiscal years, after which time no further contribution to the County will be required by the District, and the District will not be required to make any further contributions for repair, maintenance or replacement of these hydrants. The 2010-2011 budget reflects a decrease of $53,000, or 37%. Hydrant Maintenance $ Budget 2009-2010 20,000 $ Budget 2010-2011 8,000 Contribution to County for Hydrant Maintenace for Hydrants in Front of Backflow Device $ Hydrant Repairs (Outside Vendor) $ I TOTAL I $ 88,000 $ 35,000 $ 143,000 I $ 67,000 15,000 90,000 I BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 34 Final POST Hearing 16 11 A 1 001-5220-052-004. 600 - 604 EMERGENCY MEDICAUALS SERVICES/ SUPPLIES-BUDGET LINE 99 The Board of Fire Commissioners has identified the ALS program as a District priority. The 2009- 2010 budget contains provision for the replacement of medical supplies necessary to provide the Advanced Life Support services to the residents of the District. Provision is also made for the annual maintenance on both the District and County owned Zoll Monitors, medical equipment repair and recertifications. The 2010-2011 budget reflects a decrese of $28,389 or 33% as compared to the prior year's budget. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Medical Supplies $ 45,000 $ 35,000 Medical Reporting Software System Maintenance Oxygen Refill and Service $ 8,500 $ 8,500 Medical Equipment Repair $ 2,289 $ 1,000 Medical Protocol Printing $ 3,000 $ ACLS/BLS Recertification Field Training Officers Community CPR Program $ - $ Annual Zoll Monitor Maintenane - District & County Units (10-11 District Only) $ 26,200 $ 12,100 I TOTAL $ 84,989 $ 56,600 I Note: Total cost to maintain ALS Program: 2009-2010 2010-2011 Supplies and Non-Capital Equipment $ 84,989 $ 56,600 Capital Purchases $ - $ Designated Reserves $ 552,000 $ 250,000 EMS Travel & Per Diem $ 5,500 $ Field Training Officer - New Professional Pay $ 15,000 $ Paramedic Training - Off Duty Overtime $ 50,000 $ Recertifications $ 5,000 $ 5,200 Paramedic College Courses/Seminar $ 11,500 $ 37,400 Medical Director $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 738,989 $ 364,200 BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 35 Final POST Hearing 16 I ~ ~1 001-5220-051-000 OFFICE SUPPLIES - BUDGET LINE 100 The budget amount for this expense line was derived by comparing the average office supply expense for the last four fiscal years with the projected total expense for the current year. ITOTAL 1$ Budget 2009-2010 35,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 25,000 I 001-5220-051-003 OFFICE SUPPLIES - PREVENTION - BUDGET LINE 101 Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 Fire Preventionllnspection Forms and Contracts & Mis. Supplies $ $ ITOTAL I $ 6,000 $ - $ 6,000 I $ 2,000 2,000 I BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 36 Final POST Hearing 16 If Al 001-5220-052-001. 100 - 102 PROTECTIVE GEAR-BUDGET LINE 102 The Protective Gear budget line provides for replacement of protective gear (excluding bunker pants and coat, which is identified as a capital asset), and the purchase of protective gear for new employees. This expense line also provides for the mandatory inspection, cleaning and repair of existing protective gear. The 2010-2011 budget reflects a decrease of $3,950 or 11 % as compared to the prior year's budget. Budget Budget ITEM 2009-2010 2010-2011 Firefighter Gloves $ 3,000 $ 2,500 Nomax Hoods $ 1,000 $ 500 Suspenders $ 500 $ 500 Webbing $ 200 $ Helmets $ 5,000 $ 3,000 Helmet Visors $ 500 $ 500 Inspection, Cleaning & Repair $ 17,000 $ 13,000 Extractor Maintenance $ - $ 500 Unexpected Gear Repair $ 3,000 $ 1,500 Wildland Gear $ 750 $ 5,000 Bunker Boots $ 3,000 $ 3,000 I TOTAL 1$ 33,950 I $ 30,000 I 001-5220-052-002. 200 - 206 UNIFORMS-BUDGET LINE - LINE 103 Pursuant to Article 17 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement and Section 16 of District Policies, each bargaining unit and non-bargaining unit sworn employee is alloted a specific dollar amount per year for the purchase of uniforms. In addition the District also provides uniforms on a limited bases for administrative staff, and two polo shirts for each Fire Commissioner. This budget line also provides for the replacement of sworn employees' boots. The 2010-2011 budgeted amount reflects a decrease of $4,500 or 10% as compared to the prior year. Annual Uniform Allotman Per Contract Non-Bargaining Employees Honor Guard Commissioners I TOTAL $ $ $ $ $ Budget 2009-2010 37,000 $ 5,000 $ 2,000 $ 500 $ 44,500 I $ Budget 2010-2011 32,500 5,000 2,000 500 40,000 I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 37 Final POST Hearing 001-5220-052-007 HURRICANE/EMERGENCY SUPPLIES-BUDGET LINE 104 16Y'lA11 This budget line provides for the purchase of items necessary to have on hand during a declared state of emergency, including chain saws, replacement blades, leasing of heavy equipment, and food and water for employees, other emergency service personnel and volunteers housed at District facilities. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 - I $ 5,000 I I TOTAL 1$ 001-5220-052-000. 301 - 303 STATION SUPPLIES-BUDGET LINE 105 Provision for basic supplies for all stations is made within this budget line. The amount provided for in the 2010-2011 budget reflects an increase of $3,100, or 10% as compared to the prior year. Cleaning & Maintenance Supplies $ $ 1$ Budget 2009-2010 27,900 $ - $ 27,900 I $ I TOTAL 001-5220-051-001 OFFICE EQUIPMENT (NON-CAP IT AL)-BUDGET LINE 106 Budget 2010-2011 31,000 31,000 I The Office Equipment (Non-Capital) budget line provides for the purchase of small office equipment (items with an individual cost of less than $1,000 such as printers and fax machines), printer cartridges and the lease and maintenance fees for photocopy machines. The 2010-2011 budget reflects no increase as compared to the 2009-2010 budgeted amount. amount provided remains the same, largely due to the copier leases and maintenance agreements, which contractually do not decrease during the 2010-2011 year. Budget 2009-2010 30,000 $ 1,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ ITEM Copier Leases & Maintenance Postage Machine Lease Printer Repair & Maintenance Printer Cartridges/Supplies Misc. Office Equip. $ $ $ $ $ I TOTAL 1$ 40,000 I $ BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 38 Budget 2010-2011 30,000 1,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 40,000 I Final POST Hearing 16 t'~l A 1 001-5220-051-004 OFFICE EQUIPMENT -NON-CAPIT AL-PREVENTION-BUDGET LINE 107 As with office supplies, the Fire Prevention Bureau submits an annual list of non-capital office equipment requirements for items specific to the Bureau. The 2010-2011 cost budgeted reflects a slight decrease of $350 as compared to the 2009-2010 budgeted amount. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 Printer - Plans Room RAM Increase - Laptops Printer Cartridges-Laptops Color Printer Cartridges $ $ $ $ 250 $ - $ 2,000 $ 100 $ 2,000 I TOTAL 1$ 2,350 I $ 2,000 I 001-5220-064-001. 500 - 505 FIRE EQUIPMENT-NON-CAPITAL-BUDGET LINE 108 Contained within the Fire Equipment (non-capital) budget line are provisions for the purchase of fire equipment with a cost of less than $1,000 per item. The amount provided for in the 2010-2011 budget reflects a decrease of $6,000, or 10% as compared to the prior year's budget. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Class A Foam $ 2,000 $ 4,500 Class B Foam $ 3,000 $ Batteries $ 1,000 $ 2,500 Absorbent $ 4,000 $ 8,000 Hand Tool & Small Equipment Replacement $ - $ Replacement SCBA Bottles $ 8,000 $ Hurst Hydraulic Hose Replacement $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Replacement Gauges for High Rise Packs $ 1,000 $ 125 GPM Foam Inductors (2) $ - $ Fire Hose $ 20,000 $ 30,000 Dave Clark System (P45) $ - $ Misc. Items for New Engine $ 10,000 $ Miscellaneous Equipment $ 10,000 $ 8,000 I TOTAL 1$ 61,000 I $ 55,000 I BJBJbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 39 Final POST Hearing 16 11 A l' 001-5220-052-008 SHOP EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES - NON-CAPITAL - BUDGET LINE 109 The Shop Equipment-Non-Capital & Supplies budget line provides for the purchase of small equipment costing less than $1,000 and basic supplies for the shop/maintenance facility. The 2009-2010 budgeted amount reflects an increase of $2,000, or 40%, as compared to the prior year. Miscellaneous Small Tools and Equipment Shop Towels and Rags NFPA Books Electrical Terminal and Brass Assortment Miscellaneous Supplies (Oil, etc) $ $ $ $ $ Budget 2009-2010 1,800 $ 2,000 $ 200 $ 1,000 $ - $ 5,000 1 $ Budget 2010-2011 2,000 500 4,500 ITOTAL 1$ 7,000 I 001-5220-052-009 WAREHOUSE/LOGISTICS SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT-BUDGET LINE 110 The Warehouse/Logistics Supplies & Equipment budget line provides for supplies and small equipment required to operate the warehouse and logistics center for the District, including supplies to clean and maintain protective equipment. The 2010-2011 budgeted amount reflects a decrease of $100 as compared to the 2009-2010 budget. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 600 $ 900 - $ 100 500 See Protective Gear Laundry Soap & Supplies for Bunker Gear Miscellaneous Shipping/Receiving Supplies Service Contract for Extractors $ $ $ ITOTAL 1$ 1,100 I $ 1,000 1 BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-1019-21-10 40 Final POST Hearing 16 , i 41 001-5220-031-000.100 -108 PROFESSIONAL FEES-BUDGET LINE 111 The District routinely utilizes a large variety of professional services, including legal, computer support, and the employee assistance program. Because the extent of services required cannot always be determined for the coming fiscal year, current year projections are used to estimate anticipated future costs, making allowances for fee increases. The 2010-20110 Professional Fees budget reflects a decrease of $45,000 or 16% as compared to the prior year. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Weiss, Serota $ 50,000 $ 30,000 Cardillo, Keith & Bonaquist $ 5,000 $ 1,000 Manson Law Group (Laura Donaldson) $ 85,000 $ 85,000 Markham, Norton, Mostettler & Co. (non-audit) $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Stroemer, Tuscan & Co. (non-audit) $ 1,000 $ SW FL. Polygraph (Background Checks) $ 1,000 $ Employee Assistance Services $ 4,000 $ Temporary Service - Administrative $ - $ GASB 45 Actuarial Study $ 8,000 $ 8,000 Computer Service $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Benefit Consultant $ 35,000 $ 35,000 Consultant - Computer Programmer $ - $ Consultant - Fire Assessment Fees $ 35,000 $ Medical Director $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Miscellaneous Professional Fees $ 15,000 $ 35,000 I TOTAL 1$ 280,000 I $ 235,000 I 001-5220-049-009 COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY TAX APPRAISER'S FEES-BUDGET LINE 112 Estimated fees are computed based on the budget of the Collier County Propery Appraiser's Office, and are provided to the District via written corrrespondence from that office. These fees constitute the District's share of the Property Appraiser's annual budget, which is how the Property Appraiser is compensated for providing property tax assessments to the District. ITOTAL 1$ Budget 2009-2010 208,865 I $ Budget 2010-2011 208,865 I BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 41 Final POST Hearing 16 J ~1 A .fl 001-5220-049-000 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR FEES-BUDGET LINE 113 The Collier County Tax Collector receives an annual fee for collecting and distributing Ad Valorem taxes to the District. The cost is based on Section 192.091, Florida Statute, and utlizes a formula based on Ad Valorem collected. Estimated Tax Revenue Budget 2009-2010 24,038,878 $ Budget 2010-2011 21,821,182 $ Collector's Fees: 3% of first $50,000 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 2% on Balance ($21,771,182) $ 479,778 $ 435,424 Postage $ 2,500 $ 2,500 I TOT AL - OPTION 1 - .9869 Millage Rate 1$ 483,778 I $ 439,424 I 001-5220-032-000 AUDITOR FEES-BUDGET LINE 114 The District is required by law to undergo an annual audit by an independent auditing firm and must submit an audited financial statement to the Auditor General on an annual basis. Estimated fees are based on current year expenditures and reflect a decrease of $15,000, or 18%. ITOTAL 1$ Budget 2009-2010 80,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 65,000 I BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 42 Final POST Hearing 001-5220-049-004 16 tJ,' A 1 SPECIAL ASSESSOR'S FEE FOR ST. #44-WATER /SEWER-BUDGET LINE 115 This assessment reflects the District's portion of the water and sewer assessment allocated to Station #44 by the County. Collier County Emergency Services pays 38% of this assessment and the District pays 62% of the assessment. The amount provided for in the 2010-2011 budget reflects no increase based on the actual cost incurred during the 2009-2010 fiscal year. ITOTAL 1$ Budget 2009-2010 5,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 5,000 I 001-5220-040-000. 101 -105.200.300.400.500.600. 700. 800 TRAVEL AND PER DIEM-BUDGET LINE 116 This account reflects all travel and per diem reimbursement expenses for all conferences, seminars and employee and Commissioner travel outside of the District boundaries. Because budget requests for training, seminars and conferences are submitted as much as one year in advance of the event, the exact location and associated travel costs are often unknown and therefore costs are estimated. Where possible, the associated expense budget line has been identified. The 2010-2011 budget reflects a decrease of $36,225, or 78%, as compared to the 2010-2011 budget. Travel/Per Diem - Operations: Training Emergency Medical Service Boat Team Dive Team TRT Team K-9 Team CERT Team HazMat Travel/Per Diem Operations Essential Travei, Including Legislative Session Travel/Per Diem - Prevention Training Travel/Per Diem - Administration/Commissioners/EVT Reimbursable Travel & Per Diem (Funded Training) Miscellaneous I TOTAL BJBIbb 7-15-1018-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Budget 2009-2010 19,725 5,500 Budget 2010-2011 1,000 1,000 500 1,000 28,725 $ 10,000 $ 500 $ $ 7,000 $ 5,000 $ 1$ 5,000 46,225 I $ 10,000 I 43 Final POST Hearing J 6 l d ~l 001-5220-048-000 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE-BUDGET LINE 117 The District employs one full time Public Information Officer, who is tasked with the development, implementation and coordination of all public information programs, including providing information to the media and maintaining the District's photographic records. The 2010-2011 budget reflects a decrease of $500 or 14% as compared to the prior year's budget. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 300 350 ITEM DESCRIPTION Annual Subscription-NON Annual Subscription-News Pro Enlargements VCR Tapes-40 Packs Picture Framing Miscellaneous Supplies Newsletter Total Items 250 500 1,500 2,900 MEMBERSHIPS Florida Association of PIOs Florida CERT Florida Fire Chiefs Association Total Memberships 50 50 100 ITOTAL 3,000 I 001-5220-048-001. 101 - 103 PUBLIC EDUCATION OFFICE-BUDGET LINE 118 The expenses provided in this budget line fund the public education programs offered throughout the year to the residents and visitors of the community, and includes the District's promotion of public safety. The 2010-2011 provision reflects a slight decrease of $100 as compared to the 2009-2010 budget. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Free Citizen's CPR Classes $ - $ Super Sitter Course $ - $ Halloween Open House $ 4,000 $ 4,000 General Fire Safety $ - $ Explorer Post #2297 $ - $ Venturing Crew #2001 $ 100 $ Fire Safety Programs $ 5,000 $ 15,000 Pulic Awareness EducationlWebsite $ 15,000 $ 5,000 I TOTAL 1$ 24,100 I $ 24,000 I BJBlbb 7-15-10/6-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 44 Final POST Hearing 16 f'1 A 1 001-5220-052-003 VEHICLE FUEL & Oil-BUDGET LINE 119 This expense line reflects vehicle fuel and oil for all District apparatus and vehicles. Because of the fluctuation of gasoline and diesel prices, and the inability to accurately predict what those prices will be in the coming fiscal year, especially in light of the recent significant increases, cost estimates for budgeting purposes have been made by factoring in a 30% cost per gallon increase. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 DISTRICT VEHICLES 8 Engines 4 Aerials 1 Telesquirts 1 Water Tender 4 Brush Trucks 42 Staff Cars 2 Rescues 1 Reserve Engine 4 Boats 1 Antique Engine 2 A TVS (Beach) 3 SRUs I TOTAL 1$ 300,000 I $ 250,000 I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 45 Final POST Hearing 16 J 1 A IJ 001-5220-054-911 TRAINING AND EDUCATION COURSES AND PROGRAMS BUDGET LINE 120 This budget line reflects payment of the cost of public college courses, Florida State Fire College courses, and paramedic college courses. These costs have been segreated from other training course costs to more easilty identify the cost of college level courses. The amount provided for in the 2010-2011 budget reflects an increase of $8,900 or 14% as compared to the prior year's budget. This increase is due to the provision for paramedic certification courses (11 employees) in conjunction with the provision of possible future interfacility services. Florida State Fire College & Public College $ Paramedic Certification Courses (11 at $3,400) Budget 2009-2010 63,500 $ $ 63,500 I $ Budget 2010-2011 35,000 37,400 I TOTAL I $ 72,400 I 001-5220-054-001. 002. 201 - 203. 301 - 303. 701. 801 - 806. 901 - 910 TRAINING COURSES/CONF. - BUDGET LINE 121 (09-10) COMBINED WITH 120 (10-11) The budget line for training education for the fiscal year 2010-2011 reflects the cost for all courses and conferences for all divisions of the District, including promotional testing and special. teams training. The total costs budgeted for the 2010-2011 year reflects a decrease of $25,875 or 60% as compared to the 2009-2010 budget. ODerations: Budget Budget TraininQ Division 2009-2010 2010-2011 Specialty Training $ - $ Instructor Development $ - $ Recert (Peer Fitness) $ 1,000 $ Outside Instructors $ 4,000 $ Promotional Testing $ 7,000 $ 10,000 Unannounced Training $ 4,000 $ Firefighter Development $ 1,000 $ Total - Training Division $ 17,000 $ 10,000 Emeroencv Medical Services Emergency Medical Service Conferences $ 1,500 $ EMT/Paramedic Recertifications $ 5,500 $ 5,200 Total- Emergency Medical Services $ 7,000 $ 5,200 BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 46 Final POST Hearing Dive Team Med Dive - 08/09; IADRS Conference 09/10 $ DR II 08/09; CC SO Underwater Invest. 09/10 $ Total - Dive Team $ HazMat Team Unidentified Conferences and Training $ Total - HazMat Team $ Technical Rescue Team Outside Training $ Training Adjuncts $ Total - Technical Rescue Team $ Boat Team Unidentified Training and Recert. $ Total - Boat Team $ K-9 Search and Rescue TraininQ Out of District Training $ Total - K-9 Search and Rescue $ Fire Prevention NICET/FAlFS $ Total - Fire Prevention $ Administration Payroll Certification Conference Certified Employee Benefit Specialist Trg. APA Year End Seminar HR Collier Monthly Seminars & Annual Conference Community Affairs Meeting Int. Assoc. of Fire Chiefs Facilities Training Mechanics Training - EVT Professional Development Leadership Collier FDIC Commissioners' Training FASD Conferences/Seminars IAFF Chiefs Conference Total - Administration ITOTAL TRAINING COURSES/CONF. ITOTAL-TRAINING AND EDUCATION BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-1019-13-1019-21-10 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1$ $ 47 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 1,500 $ 800 $ 2,300 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ - $ - $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,000 $ 500 - $ 500 $ Budget 2009-2010 - $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 500 $ 750 $ 600 $ - $ 1,425 $ 1,000 $ - $ - $ 1,500 $ 3,000 $ 1,000 $ 11,275 $ 43,075 I $ 106,575 $ 16 11 A 1 Budget 2010-2011 500 500 500 2,000 17,200 I 89,600 I Final POST Hearing 001-5220-054-821 - 830 16 "'i1 AIJ TRAINING - SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT - BUDGET LINE 122 The expenses contained within this budget line are for the supplies and equipment required for operational training. The 2010-2011 budget reflects a decrease of $16,800, or 51% as compared to the prior year. Software and Videos Books (Including College Course Books) NFPA AccesslE Subscription Propane Training Tower Maintenance Audio Visual Equipment Smoke Machine Supplies Props and Training Supplies Auto Extrication Training Miscellaneous I TOTAL 001-5220-099-000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Budget 2009-2010 2,000 4,000 800 6,000 2,000 2,500 3,000 5,000 6,000 1,500 Budget 2010-2011 1,000 2,000 $ $ $ $ 6,000 Inc. in Bldg. Maint $ $ $ $ $ 2,000 1,000 3,000 1,000 1$ 16,000 I 32,800 I $ MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE-BUDGET LINE 123 The Miscellaneous Expense budget line provides for expenses, often one-time in nature, which cannot be categorized to another expense line. The 2010-2011 budgeted amount reflects a decrease of $15,000 or 45% as compared to the prior year's budget. I TOTAl 001-5220-054-000 BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 1$ 48 Budget 2009-2010 25,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 10,000 I Final POST Hearing 16 I f)i ~l SUBSCRIPTION AND DUES-BUDGET LINE 124 The District used to provide a variety of trade related and informational publications for staff. However, budgetary constraints have resulted in a signficant reduction in the provision of these materials. The amount provided in the budget has not signficantly decreased because there are two major components to this budget line - the Florida Association of Special District dues, and the dues for membership in the Fire Service Steering Committee. The amount provided for in the 2010-2011 budget does reflect a decrease of $2,400, or 30% as compared to the prior year. Budget Budget ITEM 2009-2010 2010-2011 CC Fire Chiefs Association (1) $ 50 $ 50 Naples Daily News-7 Stations $ - $ Dep1. of Com. Affairs-Special Districts $ 250 $ 250 Florida Public Personnel Association (District M/Ship) $ 125 $ 125 FDSOA & Others (Training) $ 500 $ Florida Fire Chief Association (1) $ 525 $ 75 In1. Assoc. of Fire Chiefs (1) $ 500 $ 125 Florida Assoc. of Special Dis1. $ 4,000 $ 3,200 Sam's Club $ 175 $ 175 Florida CERT Assoc. (1) $ 15 $ 15 American Payroll Association (1) $ 300 $ 300 SW Florida American Payroll Association (1) $ 165 $ 165 Society for Human Resource Management (1) $ 165 $ 165 Payroll Source $ 165 $ 165 HR Collier (1) $ 40 $ 40 Fire Service Steering Committee $ 910 $ 750 Firehouse Magazine- (Chief, S1. 43 & 45) $ 90 $ Fire Engineering Magazine (Chief) $ 35 $ ITOTAL 1$ 8,010 I $ 5,600 I BJBIbb 7-15-1018-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 49 Final POST Hearing 16 /1 A J 001-5220-054-010 PREVENTION-DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS-BUDGET LINE 125 Identified below are membership dues unique to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The 2010-2011 budget provision reflects a 48% decrease as compared to the prior year. IMI FL Chapter IMI NFPA Collier County Fire Marshals Florida Fire Marshal & Inspector Assoc. International Fire Chiefs Association Florida Fire Chiefs Assoc. Budget 2009-2010 $ 75 $ $ 150 $ $ 88 $ $ 10 $ $ 100 $ $ 75 $ $ 90 $ 1$ 5881 $ Budget 2010-2011 150 90 10 50 I TOTAL 300 I 001-5220-054-012 PETC-BUDGET LINE 126 This expense line represents the District's portion of funding to maintain the Pre-Employment Testing Committee. Our estimated share is usually provided by written communication from the Committee. However, no such communication has been received for the last three years and no contribution has been requested. Therefore, no budgetary provision has been made for a contribution. I TOTAL Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 1$ -I $ -I 001-5220-054-011 LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS-BUDGET LINE 127 The District is required by Florida Statute to provide legal notice of regular meetings, workshops and special meetings. The District is also required to publically advertise for Request for Proposals and Invitations to Bid. The amount provided for in the 2010-2011 budget reflects a decrease of 33%, based on current year expense. ITOTAL 1$ Budget 2009-2010 9,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 6,000 I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 50 Final POST Hearing 001-5220-054-200 16' 1 A1 I DIVE RESCUE TEAM-BUDGET LINE 128 The Dive Team consists of 27 members who respond to any and all situations involving water rescue, including vehicles in canals, drownings and recovery of evidence. Each member is a Dive Rescue I certified diver, and 3 members are Public Safety Scuba Instructors. The 2010-2011 budget reflects a decrease of $3,300, or 39% as compared to the prior year. Budget Budget DIVE TEAM EQUIPMENT 2009-2010 2010-2011 Annual Equipment Maintenance $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Dive Rescue Mannequin $ Dry Suit Gloves $ Mark 2 Mask and Light (5) $ 1,850 Ambient Air Assys. $ 500 Communication Assemblies $ 500 Replacement Fins/Masks/SnorkelslWts.lBelts $ 1,500 BCslRegulators $ 500 Miscellaneous Equipment $ 500 $ 3,000 Total Dive Team Equipment $ 7,350 $ 5,000 DUES/MEMBERSHIPS PSD - Recertification $ 700 PSSI Re-Certs $ 250 Total Dive Dues/Memberships $ 950 $ ITOTAL $ 8,300 I $ 5,000 I NOTE: Total Cost to Maintain Dive Time is as follows: Dive Budget $ 8,300 $ 5,000 Dive - Capital $ 4,000 $ Budgeted with Prof. Pay (Team Ldr. & Asst. Team Ldr. Incentive Pay) $ 6,240 $ 6,240 Budgeted with Training Courses $ 2,300 $ Budgeted with Travel/Per Diem $ 1,000 $ Budgeted with Training Bonus( Per CBA) $ 7,500 $ 7,500 Budgeted with Overtime $ 35,053 $ 37,466 TOTAL COST TO MAINTAIN DIVE $ 64,393 $ 56,206 BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 51 Final POST Hearing 16 , 1 Al 001-5220-054-980. 951.952 FIRE PREVENTION MATERIALS & SUPPLIES-BUDGET LINE 129 The Fire Marshal annually submits a list of the anticipated requirements for Fire Prevention Bureau, including key boxes, anemometers to test air flow, NFPA reference mannuals and basic operational supplies which comprise this budget line. The 2010-2011 budgetary provision reflects a decrease of $8,280, or 62% as compared to the 09-10 budget. ITEM NFPA Handbooks, Reference Manuals & CDs Other Materials Key Boxes (25 at $550 Each 08-09;20 at $502 09-10) (Key Boxes have Cost Recovery) Budget 2009-2010 2,600 $ 650 $ Budget 2010-2011 1,000 $ $ $ $ 10,030 $ 4,000 - $ 13,280 I $ 5,000 I I TOTAL 1$ BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 52 Final POST Hearing 001-5220-054-008 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TEAM-BUDGET LINE 130 16/1Al The HazMat Team consists of 39 members, which include 3 Chief Officers. The team members are trained to deal with chemical spills, leaks and radiological emergencies, as well as terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. The District's HazMat Team is one of twenty-three District Response Teams recognized by the Department of Community Affairs. The 2010-2011 budget reflects a decrease of $1,000 or 20% as compared to the 2009-2010 budget. HAZMAT EQUIPMENT Patch and Plug Pads/Booms Replacement of Sampling Supplies Rehab/Extended Operations Supplies Budget 2009-2010 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ $ $ $ I TOTAL 1$ 5,000 I $ NOTE: Total cost to maintain HazMat Team is as follows: HazMat Budget $ 5,000 $ HazMat Budget - Capital $ 5,000 $ Medical (Budgeted with Physicals) $ 6,000 $ Budgeted with Training Courses $ 2,000 $ Budgeted with Travel/Per Diem $ 1,000 $ Budgeted with Prof. Pay (Team Leader, Assl Team Leader) $ 6,240 $ Budgeted with Training Bonus (Per CBA) $ 10,200 $ Budgeted with Overtime $ 59,025 $ TOTAL COST TO MAINTAIN HAZMAT TEAM $ 94,465 $ BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-1019-21-10 53 Budget 2010-2011 1,000 1,000 2,000 4,000 I 4,000 6,000 6,240 10,200 61,996 88,436 Final POST Hearing 16 J ~ 1 f 001-5220-054-009 TECHNICAL RESCUE TEAM-BUDGET LINE 131 The District's 30 member Technical Rescue Team is trained for confined space, structural collapse. trench collapse and high angle rescue operations. The 2010-2011 budgeted amount reflects a decrease of $350, or 8%, as compared to the 2009-2010 budget. The 2010-2011 budgeted amount is comprised of only absolutely essential small equipment replacement items. Budget Budget HIGH ANGLE CONFINED SPACE 2009-2010 2010-2011 large Carabiners $ - $ Xlarge Carabiners $ - $ Single and Double Pulleys $ - $ 2 Double Pulleys $ - $ Replacement Hardware $ - $ Replacement Class III Harnesses $ - $ Replacement Rescue Gloves $ - $ Replacement Helmet Lights $ - $ Replacement Rescue Rope $ - $ Materials for Confined Space Maze $ 2,000 $ 2.000 Miscellaneous Supplies $ 700 $ 750 Total-High Angle Confined Space $ 2,700 $ 2,750 TRENCHffiTRUCTURALCOLLAPSE Steel Pins $ - $ 10" circular saw $ - $ Personal Protective Equipment $ - $ Framing Nailer (Coil) $ - $ Hot Stick Energy Tester $ - $ Portable Lighting $ - $ Hand Tools/lumber $ 1,650 $ 1.250 Total-Trench/Structural Collapse $ 1,650 $ 1,250 lTOTAL 1$ 4,350 I $ 4,000 I NOTE: Total cost to maintain TRT Team is as follows: TRT Budget $ 4,350 $ 4,000 TRT Budget - Capital $ - $ Budgeted with Prof. Pay (Team Leader and Asst. Team Leader) $ 6,240 $ 6,240 Budgeted with Training $ 2,500 $ Budgeted with Travel/Per Diem $ 1,000 $ Budgeted with Training Bonus (per CBA) $ 8,400 $ 8,400 Budgeted with Overtime $ 82,485 $ 93,261 TOTAL COST TO MAINTAIN TRT TEAM $ 104,975 $ 111,901 BJB/bb 7-15-10/6-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 54 Final POST Hearing 16 Ii' Al 001-5220-054-100 BOAT TEAM-BUDGET LINE 132 The District's Boat Team consists of 16 boat operators, 13 of whom are Coast Guard certified boat captains. The Boat Team assists in water rescue operations. The budgeted expenses for 2010-2011 reflects no change from the 2009-2010 budgeted amount. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Boat Slip Annual Maintenance Fee $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Life Raft Certification $ 750 $ Bottom Paint and Haulout (Annual) $ - $ Dehumidifier $ 750 $ Hand Held GPS $ 500 $ Miscellaneous Equipment $ 500 $ 2,500 ITOTAL 1$ 5.500 I $ 5.500 I NOTE: Total cost to maintain Boat Team is as follows: Boat Team Budget $ 5,500 $ 5,000 Boat Team Budget - Capital $ - $ Budgeted with Training Courses $ 2,000 $ Budgeted with Travel/Per Diem $ - $ Budgeted with Prof. Pay (Team leader and Asst. Team Leader) $ 6,240 $ 6,240 Budgeted with Training Bonus (per CBA) $ 4,500 $ 4,500 Budgeted with Overtime $ 17,160 $ 15,247 TOTAL COST TO MAINTAIN Boat Team $ 35,400 $ 30,987 BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 55 Final POST Hearing 16 11 A J 001-5220-054-007 CERT-BUDGET LINE 133 The District currently has 22 trained and equipped Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) within the District comprised of over 350 concerned citizens. These team members receive special training to respond to and assist others during a storm, hurricane or other emergency event. The CERT education program consists of a 24 hour course presented over 8 weeks, free of charge. The expenses identified in this budget line are the materials, supplies and equipment required to continue training additional teams and support the existing teams. The 2010-2011 budgeted amount reflects a decrease of $1,500, or 25% as compared to the prior year. Budget 2009-2010 CERT Functions CERT Supplies CERT Publications $ $ $ 1$ 500 $ 4,000 $ 1,500 $ Budget 2010-2011 500 2,500 1,500 I TOTAL 6,000 I $ 4,500 I 001-5220-054-401 PEER FITNESS - BUDGET LINE 134 Budget 2009-2010 Small Equipment ITOTAL $ 1$ 500 $ 500 I $ Budget 2010-2011 100 100 I 001-5220-054-820 K-9 SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAM-BUDGET LINE 135 The District has operated Collier County's only active search and rescue canine team. Costs reflected in this budget line include veterinary fees and out of District training. The 2010-2011 budget reflects no financial provision for this program since the District does not have a K-9 search team at this time. K-9 EQUIPMENT/MISC. K-9 Medical Miscellaneous Supplies I TOTAL Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 TOTAL COST TO MAINTAIN K-9 Team $ $ 1$ $ - $ - $ -I $ -I - $ BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 56 Final POST Hearing CONTINGENCY-BUDGET LINE 138 16 I ~1 This budget line is provided to cover excess expenditures from other budget lines during the course of the year. I TOTAL Budget 2009-2010 50,000 I $ 1$ BJBlbb 7.15.10/8-27.10/9.13-10/9.21.10 57 Budget 2010-2011 50,000 I Final POST Hearing Al 16 .'lA t CAPITAL-STATION IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIPMENT-BUDGET LINE 160 This budget line reflects expenditures for all of the District's stations which meet the criteria of a fixed asset (cost of $1,000 or more, and a life expectancy of more than one year). The 2010-2011 expenditures reflect a decrease of $349,000, or 95%, as compared to the prior year's budget. Budget Budget Station #40 2009-2010 2010-2011 Window Replacement $ - $ Concrete Replacement $ 100,000 $ Emergency Generator (75 KW) $ 58,000 $ Total-Station #40 $ 158,000 $ Station #42 Emergency Traffic Device $ - $ Treadmill $ 3,500 $ Washer/Dryer $ - $ Total-Station #42 $ 3,500 $ Station #43 Vehicle Exhaust System $ 29,000 $ Flagpole Light $ - $ Air Conditioner Replacement $ - $ Intercom Upgrades $ - $ Total-Station #43 $ 29,000 $ Station #44 Treadmill $ - $ Replace Bay Doors $ - $ Concrete Replacement $ 13,500 $ Total-Station #44 $ 13,500 $ Station #45 Water Heater $ - $ AlC Unit Replacements (Two) - Ops Side $ 30,000 $ Remodel of Space for Air Compressor Fill Sys. $ 20,000 $ Clean Agent Sprinkler System-Computer Rm. $ 17,000 $ $ - $ Total- Station #45 $ 67,000 $ BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-1019-21-10 58 Final POST Hearing Station #46 Total- Station #46 Station #47 Vehicle Exhaust System (NNFD Share) Total-Station #47 Tavlor Road Facilitv Total - Taylor Road Facility Miscellaneous Capital Improvements-Stations $ $ Budget 2009-2010 $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ - $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 16 /1 Budget 2010-2011 15,000 15,000 TOTAL CAPITAL PURCHASES-ALL FACILITIES $ 15,000 275,000 $ BJBIbb 7-15-1018-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 59 Final POST Hearing All 1 16 "1 A 1 001-5220-064-001. 200 - 202 CAPITAL PURCHASES-FIRE EQUIPMENT-BUDGET LINE 161 Purchases of capital fire equipment for the 2010-2011 fiscal year consists predominantly of replacement equipment which may not be specifically identified at this time, but which need may arise throughout the fiscal year. The 2010-2011 budgeted amount reflects a decrease of $5,000 or 20% as compared to the prior year's budget. ITEM Replacement Capital Equipment ITOTAL $ 1$ Budget 2009-2010 25,000 $ 25,000 1 $ Budget 2010-2011 20,000 20,000 I 001-5220-064-017 CAPITAL PURCHASES-PROTECTIVE GEAR-BUDGET LINE 162 This budget line reflects a decrease of $15,000 or 50%, as compared to the amount provided for in the prior year's budget. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 Bunker Gear - Replacement $ 30,000 $ 15,000 I TOTAL 1$ 30,000 I $ 15,000 I 001-5220-064-002 CAPITAL PURCHASES - MEDICAL EQUIPMENT-BUDGET LINE 163 As with the 2009-2010 budget, no provision has been made for the purchase of Capital Medical Equipment. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 $ $ - $ - $ ITOTAL 1$ -I $ -I BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 60 Final POST Hearing 1611A~, 001-5220-064-009. 301 - 302 CAPITAL PURCHASES- COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT-BUDGET LINE 164 The provision for the purchase of Capital Communication Equipment in the201 0-2011 has been limited to $5,000 for replacement 800M HZ radios. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 800 MHZ Radios $ - $ 5,000 VHF Portable Radios $ - $ VHF Mobile Radio (1) $ - $ 1 800 MHZ Mobile Radio $ - $ I TOTAL 1$ -I $ 5,000 I 001-5220-064-013 CAPITAL PURCHASES-OFFICE EQUIPMENT-BUDGET LINE 165 The 2010-2011 budget reflects no provision for Capital - Office Equipment purchases. Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment - Admin. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 2,500 $ $ I TOTAL 1$ 2,500 I $ - I BJBIbb 7-15-10/8-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 61 Final POST Hearing 16 11 A 1 001-5220-064-010. 600 - 604 CAPITAL PURCHASES-COMPUTERS-BUDGET LINE 166 This budget line provides for the purchase of ten replacement computer workstations, server and router replacements, and miscellaneous hardware costing at $1,000 per item. The 2010-2011 budget line reflects an increse of $46,000 as compared to the prior year. This increase is due to the need to replace 7 of the computers in the apparatus. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 Replacement Workstations (10) - Reclassed to Non-Capital $ - $ Server Replacements (NNFD-FS4, Terminal, SQL-Healthware) $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Precision W/S $ 10,000 $ Apparatus Computer Replacements (7) $ - $ 31,000 Cisco Router Replacement $ 8,000 $ 33,000 Misc. Hardware $ 5,000 $ 5,000 I TOTAL 1$ 33,000 I $ 79,000 I 001-5220-064-006 CAPITAL PURCHASES-TRT EQUIPMENT - BUDGET LINE 167 The 2010-2011 budget contains no provision for capital purchases for the TRT Team. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 Electric Brake Hammer Electric Rebar Cutter Grip Hoist 4 Ton Rescue Kit I TOTAL 1$ -I $ -I BJBlbb 7-15-1018-27-1019-13-10/9-21-10 62 Final POST Hearing 1611A~l 001-5220-064-011 CAPITAL PURCHASES - FIRE PREVENTION - BUDGET LINE 176 The 2010-2011 budget contains no provision for Capital Purchases for the Fire Prevention Bureau. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 ITOTAL $ 1$ - $ -I $ -I 001-5220-064-018 CAPITAL PURCHASES - LAND - BUDGET LINE 178 There are no land purchases provided for in the 2010-2011 budget. ITOTAL Budget 2009-2010 1$ -I $ Budget 2010-2011 -I 001-5220-064-016 CAPITAL PURCHASES - BOAT TEAM - BUDGET LINE 168 There are no Capital Purchases for the Boat Team provided for in the 2010-2011 budget. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 $ $ - $ - $ I TOTAL 1$ -I $ -I BJBlbb 7-15-10/6-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 63 Final POST Hearing 16 J 1 '-l 001-5220-064-008. 400 - 403 CAPITAL PURCHASES - TRAINING EQUIPMENT-BUDGET LINE 169 There are no Capital Training Equipment purchases provided for in the 2010-2011 budget. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 Adult (2), Child and Infant Manikins $ Multimedia Room Equipment $ Laptop Computers (3) $ Truckman Prop $ Training Tower Stairs Repair $ Porta-Count Machine (Face Piece Fit & Seal) $ ~ffi~ $ Tower Window Props (2) $ I TOTAL $ - $ - $ 3,000 $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ 2,000 $ - $ 20,000 I $ -I 001-5220-064-004 CAPITAL PURCHASES - VEHICLES-BUDGET LINE 170 As with the 2009-2010 budget, the 2010-2011 budget contains no provision for the purchase of replacement vehicles. Replacement Vehicles: Replacement Vehicles: Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 $ - $ I TOTAL 1$ -1$ -I 001-5220-064-019. 110 - 113 CAPITAL PURCHASES - SHOP EQUIPMENT-BUDGET LINE 171 The 2010-2011 budget reflects an increase of $2,000 to fund the purchase of a commercial grade pressure washer. Misc. Capital Tools & Pressure Washer 1 TOTAL $ 1$ Budget 2009-2010 2,000 $ 2,000 I $ Budget 2010-2011 4,000 4,000 I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 64 Final POST Hearing 16 11 Al 001-5220-064-023 CAPITAL PURCHASES - LOGISTICSJWAREHOUSE-BUDGET LINE 172 No provision for Capital Purchases for the LogisticslWarehouse is made in the 2010-2011 budget. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 $ - $ I TOTAL 1$ -I $ -I 001-5220-064-015 CAPITAL PURCHASES-HAZMAT TEAM-BUDGET LINE 173 There are no HazMat Team capital purchases provided for in the 2010-2011 budget. Budget Budget 2009-2010 2010-2011 $ 5,000 $ I TOTAL 1$ 5,000 I $ -I 001-5220-064-007 CAPITAL PURCHASES - DIVE TEAM - BUDGET LINE 175 There are no Dive Team capital purchases provided for in the 2010-2011 budget. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 Whites HazMat Dry Suits (2) $ $ $ - $ 4,000 $ - $ I TOTAL 1$ 4,000 I $ -I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-1019-21-10 65 Final POST Hearing 1611.41 001-5220-064-014 CAPITAL PURCHASES - FIRE APPARATUS - BUDGET LINE 174 No provision is made for the purchase of fire apparatus in the 2010-2011 budget. Budget 2009-2010 Budget 2010-2011 $ $ - $ - $ ITOTAL 1$ -I $ -I BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-13-10/9-21-10 66 Final POST Hearing 16 11 Ai DESIGN A TED RESERVES - 2009 - 2010 In September of 2002, the Board of Fire Commissioners created Designated Reserves in the General Fund. These Designated Reserves have expanded in both classification and amount over the last several fiscal years as the Board has continued to identify the funding of these reserves as a priority for the District, especially during these times when future property values are anticipated to decline. A Designated Reserve is a portion of the General Fund's Cash Reserve which the Board identifies to be used for a specific purpose, such as the replacement of fire apparatus. By designating a portion of the cash reserve, the Board is in effect providing for major purchases over the course of several fiscal years. The Board can eliminate (or "undesignate" ) or change the amount of a Designated Reserve at any time, by resolution or motion, should a need arise. Pursuant to the Amended General Fund Budget for 2009-2010, Designated Reserves as of 9-30-10 are as follows: Category 2010 Expenses - October - December 2010 2010-2011 Excess of Expenses over Revenue 2011-2012 Expenses ALS Equipment Emergency Reserve Fire Apparatus SCBA Replacement St. #46 Improvements Projected 9/30/2010 $ 6,500,000 $ 3,400,000 $ 1,022,822 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 $ 960,037 $ 160,000 $ 20,900 Total-Designated Reserves Total-Undesignated Reserves ITotal Reserves Projected 9-30-10 $ 12,813,759 $ I $ 12.813,7591 BJBlbb 07-15-10/8-26-10/9-14-10/9-21-10 67 Final POST Hearing 16 I~ 1 Ai Designated Reserves at 9-30-11 Estimated Balance Reallocated Category at 9-30-10 Spent 10-11 10-11 Balance 9-30-11 2010/2011 Expenses-First Qtr. $ 6 500.000 $ (6,500 000) $ 6,500,000 $ 6,500.000 10-11/11-12 Expenses Over Rev. $ 3,400.000 $ (2,000 000) $ 600,000 $ 2,000,000 11-12/12-13 Expenses $ 1 022,822 $ - $ 815,922 $ 1,838,744 ALS PrOQram $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250.000 Emergency Reserve $ 500.000 $ - $ (500,000) $ - Fire APoaratus $ 960 037 $ - $ (960,037) $ - SCBA Replacement $ 160,000 $ - $ - $ 160000 St. #46 Improvements $ 20,900 $ - $ - $ 20,900 Personal Protective Gear Total-Designated Reserves $ 12,813,759 $ (8,500,000) $ 6,455,885 $ 10,769,644 Total-Undeslgnated Reserves $ - $ - Total Reserves Projected 9- 30-10 and 9-30-11 $ 12,813,759 $ 10,769,644 68 BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-14-10/9-21-10 Final POST Hearing h '" 16 ro1 H t · IMPACT FEE FUND Chapter 99-450, the District's codified enabling act, Article VI, Section 8 establishes the Board of Fire Commissioners' right to assess impact fees. Pursuant to Florida law, an impact fee must comply with the "dual rational nexus" test which requires "a reasonable connection, or rational nexus, between the need for additional capital facilities and the growth in population generated by the subdivision." Additionally, there must be a reasonable connection between the expenditure of the funds and the benefits to those paying the fee. Impact fees must be designated and segregated for the purchase or construction of capital assets (that is, items costing more than $1,000 and having a life of more than one year) required due to growth of the District. Costs to maintain, staff or replace a facility or piece of equipment may not be funded by impact fees. The Board of Fire Commissioners establishes the impact fee rate schedule each year by resolution when adopting the annual budget for the fund. In January of 2006, the District, along with the other independent fire districts in Collier County, received a study on impact fee rates prepared by an independent consultant. Contained within that study is the recommendation for the District to increase the impact fee rates to $.28 per square foot for residential structures and $.99 per square foot for commercial structures. In October of 2007, the Board adopted this revised fee structure. In order to provide incentive to the local economy, the Board chose to reduce impact fees for the 2010-2011 year by fifty percent. This reduction is for the 2010-2011 year only, and will be reconsidered on an annual basis. Since revenue estimates are conservative, expenditures from the Impact Fee Fund per the 2010-2011 budget reflect provision for the site development, engineering and other associated fees for the construction of Station #48 on Livingston Road. The Board has long acknowledged the need for this station, and identified it as the' priority for use of impact fees in the 2010-2011 fiscal year. BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-14-10/9-21-10 1 Final POST Hearing 16 I 1 ^-l NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT IMPACT FEE FUND BUDGET - 2010-2011 Budget Estimated Budget INCOME 2009-2010 Sept. 2010 2010-2011 1 Impact Fees $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 225,000 2 Other 3 Interest $ 2,000 $ 6,000 $ 3,000 TOTAL INCOME $ 452,000 $ 456,000 $ 228,000 EXPENSES 4 Station #410 - Oakes $ - $ - $ - 5 Purchase of Shop/Maint. Facility (30%) $ - $ - $ - 6 Emergency Traffic Device - St. 42 $ - $ - $ - 7 Collection Fees $ 6,000 $ 8,193 $ 5,000 8 New Vehicles $ - 9 Station #410 & #411 $ - $ - $ - 10 Emergency Traffice Device-St. #40 11 Engineering/Permitting Fees-St. #49 Station #48-Eng.lArch.lPermitting, Site 12 Development, Construction $ 400,000 $ 35,000 $ 495,000 Total Expenses $ 406,000 $ 43,193 $ 500,000 Fund Balance (Deferred Revenue) at 9-30 $ (39,277) $ 190,410 $ 603,217 Income $ 452,000 $ 456,000 $ 228,000 Expenses $ (406,000) $ (43,193) $ (500,000) Fund Balance (Deferred Revenue) at 9-30-10/9-30-11 $ 6,723 $ 603,217 $ 331,217 Final POST Hearing BJBlbb 7-15-10/8-27-10/9-14-10/9-21-10 1 6 , 1 A r .~ -. Inspection Fee Fund In February of 2003, the Board of Fire Commissioners established the Inspection Fee Fund by Resolution 03-001. This fund was created in compliance with Collier County Resolution 01-313, dated July 31,2001. Collier County Resolution 01-313 requires that all fees received from fire inspections on newly constructed structures be designated and allocated for the sole purpose of funding new construction inspections, including training and equipment relating to the field of construction inspections. Collier County collects these inspection fees for all of the independent fire districts and distributes them on a monthly basis to the East Naples Fire Control and Rescue District, the designated administrator of the inspection fees. The administrating district then distributes these fees, less a 1 % administrative fee, to each district. Upon the creation of this fund, the Fire Marshal identified those employees within the Fire Prevention Bureau whose job responsibilities were identified as new construction related, and what percentage of that employee's time was so dedicated. Currently, there are three Fire Inspectors and one Deputy Fire Marshal who are completely dedicated to new construction inspections (that is, 100% of their wages are charged to the Inspection Fee Fund). Additionally, 50% of the Fire Marshal's and 30% of two administrative assistants' wages are also charged to the Inspection Fee Fund. The 2010-2011 Inspection Fee Fund Budget provides for only wage and social security expenses, even though other personnel related, operating and capital expenditures are allowable. Based on the decline in receipt of Inspection Fees during the last three fiscal years, no other expenses have been provided for, anticipating a similar decrease in revenue for the 2010-2011 fiscal year. Should receipts be more than anticipated, the Board can always reallocate additional expenditures from the General Fund to the Inspection Fee Fund. BJBlbb 8-27-10/9-14-10/9-21-10 Final POST Hearing 16 , ~ , Al NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT INSPECTION FEE FUND 2010-2011 BUDGET Budget Estimated Budget 2009-2010 9/30/2009 2010-2011 INCOME 1 Inspection Fees $ 637,000 $ 525,000 $ 500,000 1 2 Interest $ 1,500 $ 1,963 $ 2,000 2 Total Income $ 638,500 $ 526,963 $ 502,000 Personnel Expenses 3 Salaries $ 564,946 $ 457,094 $ 439,989 3 4 Professional Pay $ 12,000 $ 10,800 $ 7,500 4 5 Overtime $ - $ - $ - 5 6 Sick Leave Pay $ 17,234 $ 17,234 $ 17,234 6 7 Social Security $ 44,136 $ 38,851 $ 35,551 7 8 Retirement - FRS $ - $ - $ - 8 9 Retirement - 175 $ - $ - $ - 9 10 Disabilitv Insurance $ - $ - $ - 10 11 Worker's Compensation $ - $ - $ - 11 12 Life/Health Insurance $ - $ - $ - 12 13 Employee Physicals $ - $ - $ - 13 Total Personnel Expenses $ 638,316 $ 523,979 $ 500,274 Operatina Expenses 14 Telephone (inc. cell and pager) $ - $ - $ - 14 15 Utilities $ - $ - $ - 15 16 Office Suppliesl Equipment $ - $ - $ - 16 17 Uniforms $ - $ - $ - 17 18 Dues & Subscriptions $ - $ - $ - 18 19 Fire Prevention Materials $ - $ - $ - 19 20 Training $ - $ - $ - 20 Total Operating Expenses $ - $ - $ - CaDital Purchases 21 Office Facility - Prevention $ - $ - $ - 21 and Renovations Thereto 22 Vehicles - New Inspectors $ - $ - $ - 22 Total Capital Purchases $ - $ - $ - TOTAL EXPENSES $ 638,316 $ 523,979 $ 500,274 FUND BALANCE (RESERVE) AT 10-01 $ - $ 184 $ 3,168 INCOME $ 638,500 $ 526,963 $ 502,000 EXPENSES $ (638,316) $ (523,979) $ (500,274) FUND BALANCE 9-30 $ 184 $ 3,168 $ 4,894 BJBlbb 8-27-1019-14-1019-21-10 Final POST Hearing J. Christopher Lombardo, Chairman Margaret Hanson, Vice Chairman Paul J. Moriarty, Sr. Treasurer James Burke, Commissioner John O. McGowan, Commissioner 16 11 A~l t 1885 Veterans Park Drive Naples, FL 34109 (239) 597-3222 Fax (239) 597-7082 North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District September 23,2010 Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34101 Re: Special Districts Reporting Information To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find the following, as required by Florida Statute: 1. Copy of Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended 9-30-09; 2. Copy of the Districfs Audit for the fiscal year ended 9-30-09; 3. Copy ofthe Districts Map; 4. Registered office and agent form; 5. Schedule of regular meetings of the Board of Fire Commissioners for the 2010-2011 fiscal year; 6. Copy of the Public Facilities Report; and 7. Copy ofthe Five Year Strategic Plan. The District has no outstanding bonds. The budgets for the General Fund, Impact Fee Fund and Inspection Fee Fund for the 2010-2011 fiscal year have been forwarded under separate cover. If you require any additional information, please contact me at the number above. Very truly yours, t~ gv-p;,u ~~ BECKY POGAN BRONSDON Assistant Chief of Administrative Services Enclosures BJP/bp 3: o :J a. QI -< ~ -0 :!. ..... '.0 ~o 5' ~ ~ 0 :J ~ ~c~a- itlS-'-' --"G) ;~~~ ?O ~ 6. ~ me m - ~~;;~ ?D;l):Dco a.~-g .. fi2ell;J.~ ~~ ~ Q. 3 g CD g" m 9- CD ~ c~. 0 Om7U, -(fJ_(J1 ~?5 $ -= ~:.~~ ES~cr; ~~[2 ~o,,~ 0.. C :;" C1:l "0:>-0 ~O:J-o -g ::.~. ~ 5.~U;~ :='>iii _ell 3;jroo.. :n 3 g ~ ~<n ~~ ell f'J o ..... o ~ :X; L..--..J " CJ to !".l s, U1 :::; -< 1> "' I QI < 1> -< g () o :3 ~ ell ;J. ~ S' (f) ell S!. o o N 00 (J1 8 I\J g :l OJ (f) ~ (0 "' " -----; ~ '---.J :xi '----.J I QI < ,1) -< '2 m x -0 g roo o Cl ro 0- QI .." S' :ll o co ~ m :3 CD :0 ro :J co -< S' S' Vi' -< ro 0) "0 -< J) "' Z o ;! in -; m Ol ~ ~ CD o 0) Q sa. .." ~. () o :3 :3 Vi' "' o o C1l U; ()-; 0:: :3 C1l :3 -; ~. (0 o' ~ o c ~ ~~ CD o Ol Q sa. ~ Z Ql :3 Cll u QI Z~ Ol 00 ~~ ~ < - CD ..,,- r~ wO) -""0 ~"' au COO) ~ > ;J. ;J. iD "' "' " 0) x I\J j5 ~ W <.D on <.D --J W N N N 161 1 A l' u ::r o o CD -; ,. in -; m :ll "' c m Z QI :3 c, ~ u ?! r o (') Dl :: o :::::l :::::l --. o .., 3 Dl ... 0' :::::l ~ c ~ (f) iii C "' oc 0.:~ ?5Z -QI :3 <1) c ~ '- (") :J [ :!1 :J Pol :J !:!. ~ o ~ c;' 11l .., o <' J) en <D -;-' --J => 00 N ;! ,3" N W -'S > "' ~ '- 5: ~ 53 -< '!; Z Ol o '" 5: "' CD 1) co '" -< u o :.0 OJ o (JJ a o "' 0- o o (') o :::::l ... Dl (') ... :::::l --. o .., 3 Dl ... 0' :::::l o W co o "" --J > S!. <' C1l Z o ;J. ::r Z OJ 10 in "' Tl ~. () o ~ Q. OJ o 0- J:) ro "' ~ (0 N o o <.D 5: Q 0;; ;J. -< (f) Z 0) :3 ell u Ol ~ '- (') Cll ~ ~ 0' III :!: o :l Z~ 0) 00 10"" -(Jl ~ < 1> ,,- r~ w~ ::~ au :.DOl ~ > 0- 0- iO "' "' m -0 :3 ::r ~ g ell 0- 10 o co OJ o (J1 @ <.D o --J o W ;J. N ::r N o N QI -0 in en iO Cl o :3 () ::r ~ sa. > ;J. :3 (f) ') < ii. '" "' -< ro '; c c: :l ~ 5: Q 0;;. ~ '!; (") :J !!!, 3 Ql :J m iil n it c. o ~ Ci' iii' s;? <' ro o " -0 '" o 0- ,1) o ,-' -< :; 0- '" -0 Cll o D- Cll ~ :l - o 3 III ... 0' :l "CD~> > > ~ '!' ? > > ocNo.. C C TI " ;:4.=":01a. a. ~ OJ 0- 5. J:) J:) "' r O-N~ ~ 0 :3 5: _. ~ Cll OJ J:) (f) ~~ ~~ u 0 :;;. J:) 1> iii ':E: :.0 "' ro Z ?! .:., 0 Cl Cl C ~ (Jl 0 OJ 0' :=5" .:.J'I ()1~ :3 ~ ro 0 ;n" < "' " ;J. 3 3 -; < :D :D 1> ;J. ';f] r u ~ 1 -< :l. OJ -; l> 0 0 -0 0 0 0- W N C 0 c: Cl Cll Cl 0) ~ W OJ "' " s: 0) :J l> jJ (1 0) :3 0.. c:r m i' => r Ol i' ~ ... iD i' ." --J 0) 0 iil fA 5' Sl ~ ;J. ~ :;0 0 Q 0 '" Qo ~ :l a ..c' ." - <.D 0 () - 0 0 i'J 5' 0 Cll 0 i'J ~ .., .., ?)" 0 2!. ::J 3 ... -iJ 0 en 3 => > III III OJ => Dl :!: m Vi 0 ::-, JJ '< 0 0 U :l :l > 1~ w l ~1 n~wlw l> en o w ~ n 3: " D cn " ~ ::: N 3~~o~ n 0 :0 0 0 w en .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 't:l...... a N '=' c: ::lJ :::l 0 0 0 '=' 0 0 0 r:lo=>=> 0 0 ~ a. iii ' ctl (lI C 0 -U c:J Z :J (j) ~~ ~ 3" ..., > n < ~ 1) 3' 1) ifj" 'Po 'D '"' 6"C) ~ ~ .:>. 0 ctl Z ;; :< Q. -:J a. ~ D ;;; :J ~ ,~ " < /1l ::::l l> "'J 0 ~ :J "- ii ~ ::. :l '" c: -0 (3 ;::: :J " " JJ .~ 0 ::l. v; o. ;;; " '" ':;1 ~ " ctl " ..., ~ < 1) iJ fJl '" " " ~ ;;r '2 :=:; ~ ~ 3 ~ 'P. '" '" ...... 5- S. .3 C ?. ." .., ::lJ ::0 " -S '" ~ ;; :J n ~ 1) JJ " ctl 9 " x ,1) (j) ;? ~ ;:; '0 N ~ 1) " -U ;;r " :;; 0 en Q. ;;; (3 e: 2: s. ~. 0 ...... a- > '" 0 n .~ ... 0 :oJ ? ~ '" 'D "" ? 3 - ,~ ~ ::. (j) 2: - < " ,~ " '" .., 0 ,0 " ;;; ". " '. 'D '" ... G1 :J " l .:z >< c ..., " ;: " ~ 2: "T1 :J ". <0 :!' -< Q. < D ;;r (1" :;; .., :l; l if '" m " c (j) ~ ~ '" g (j) " N c 'D ~ 0 s. ..., -:J .:z 0 :;- " -:J ~ ~ 'D -U < 3 '" '" U> " :J 3" :J " ~ ;:; '" 2- Fi " N Cl OJ en /1l N en w en 'en " w N A " 0 " " .... /1l OJ .... '-" " ,0 '" w ,0 ~ m 0'1 'OJ G' 0 OJ 0 .... OJ co W :0 A '" OJ W 0 A '.0 0 0 '" ;llfJl OJ " w ~~ f'Il n 0 en A " _. co c, " c: ~ 'N '" 'N 'A f'Il ", N W co " .... en 0 f'Il C" ... fJl f'Il < n' .. "n g.~ f'Il [ ~ In 'D f'Il 3 " " f'Il " ... m ;; /1l .. ~ ;;;. /1l ... fJl" f'Il ... :1 ~ -. " ~ 9!. " f'Il en w '8 " .. " on 0 '" .en :..0 'co N 'w '" "' " on ~ w 0 '" w "' ~ c: ~ n 0 r::3 :>'D -, 0 ...." In f'Il ~ 'U (lI l!:l ." N III " ,N en ~ 0 N '" '-' w ::: 0 '" w '0 "en [ :0 " "" " '.0 en " " '" w .... ~ .0 .... '"' N '" " w '0 ...0 .0 :0 'J' '0 N c, w On ~".) :0 ~~ ':0 ~ lF1 c, ~ w W :0 :0 ,~ w 5 ~ T w :0 ~, 0 '-C W ..0 en 0 16 l '1 ~ 1 '" '" '" '-, '" ~ " '0 N '0 n 3: " .0 N " '" n 0 -.J '" :5 w 0 :l => '" 0 0 c " m 0.. -n -n -n ~ OJ =' CJ )( -:' :; 3" i :; ,~ 0 1J :J ... () () () 0 '" a III 1> :J 0 0 0 ~ D 2- 2- 2- '2. :J ..., Q. Q. Q. 2- '" n 0- <ll 0 ;::;: ... :J 0- t: :0 ::J () 0 CJ ~ III .., ~ " ~ ~ u; III N ~ "" ,~ (II 0 ell :iI ~ 0 0 :J :;0 .... ,~ ~ :; "- "0 0 :2 .0 " III ~ m (Jl ~ 1J ;;; x ~ 0 '< "0 :2 :J ~ ~ "" ~ Cl ~ ;;' .... ;:; " "0 0 :J " <ll .., :>. :J '" "T1 ~ '" :J '" -< ~ m N 0 0 lD " Cl -.J III W So: tn - " '" III '" 2l => 50 -.J ~ '" :"' '"" '", '.]> "" CO '" => JO ~, CD "" 0 ;tJ tIl III < ." " III III en w ,"' " n '-.J .~ '" C ~ JO JO III N -.J ". 0 ~, en 0 III ~ tIl III < ;;' ;, 'tin a ~ ~,." III -, :+[ '" 'tI III 3 Ql " III " ... m ~ III ~ ;;;' III Vl- III ~ < ~ -, " n '" III _ 'tI III " "" " '" JO ,JO 0' '.:J CD " .:J ;) 'oJ 'oJ -l 2 ~ n 0 c:3 "." -, 0 ..." Ul III " " ... ClJ cO III W 'oJ -l ,-" :'" ~ :0 '''' ,_'1 " C1 0 :c 0 ::> "" -.J ;;: [ l.-, ,:> 'D ,JO ". JO T 'C1 W :.:, D :; '" JO ". "' ::> '" ;) ", N 3: o :l 0.. OJ -< L 6 11A l' o l:.l - l:.l r.1. m 3 III ~ - 1> -go .... \0 N o ... o :E o .., ~ CIl :::r III III - :;0 III 1J o ~ .... o .., "T1 -< ~ N o o lD c: ~ ;::;: o w o Q .... ~ ..... z o ~ :::r Z l:.l 1J m CIl :!! .., III C") o ~ - .., ~ l:.l ~ 0- :;0 III CIl o t: III o (ii' - .., [ " OJ '.0 r.> .t>. S, l.~ 3: o :l 0.. OJ -< 16 11 A 1 1> D ..., .... :D N o .... o " ClJ cO :1> l.~ l." C"). o 3 1J o ~ III ~ - c: ~ ;::;: -l '< 1J III :;0 III -l ~ 0 :J - t:~ III CIl m )( "0 III -l ~ 0 0.- _,l:.l -- t: III CIl -l o - ~ o Cll CT - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 , 1 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TOGETHER WITH REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT..... .... ... ... ...... ...... ... ......... ... ...... .... ..... ... ... 1-2 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (MD&A) ................................... i-xii BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Statement of Net Assets................................................................................... 3 Statement of Activities.................................................................................... 4 FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Governmental Funds: Balance Sheet. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Assets... ... ..... .......... ... ... ... ... ............ ......... ............ ... ... 6 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance... ... .......... ... ... ......... .............................. ... ........ ....... .........' 7 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Fiduciary Fund - Firefighters' Pension Plan: Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets... ......... . ..... ...... ... . .... ...... . ... ..... . ... ... ... .... ........ 9 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Assets...... ...... ............... ..... ...... ....... ...... .... 10 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS...... ...... ......................... .. .... .............. 11-46 REOUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION OTHER THAN MD&A BUDGET TO ACTUAL COMPARISON - MAJOR FUNDS (General and Special Revenue Funds) Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual- General Fund - Summary Statement............ .. .......... ... .......... . ...... .......... ..... .... .... 47 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - General Fund - Detailed Statement...... ..... .... ... ... ............ ... ...... ... ...... ...... .... ........ 48-50 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual- Impact Fee Fund - Summary Statement............................................................... 51 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Impact Fee Fund - Detailed Statement 52 BUDGET TO ACTUAL COMPARISON - OTHER NON-MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Special Revenue Funds: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual- Inspection Fee Fund - Summary Statement... .. .... ...... . .. .. ... .... ...... .................. ... .. 53 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Inspection Fee Fund - Detailed Statement... ...... ...... ...... ... ... ... ... .... .............. ... .... 54-55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page( s ) ADDITIONAL REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Basic Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards... ... ... .......... ..... ....... ........ ...... ... ...... .... ..... .... ....... 56-57 Independent Auditor's Report to Management.. ..... ..... ............ ... .... ..... ... ... ... ............ ... 58-59 Management's Response to Independent Auditor's Report to Management........... .... .... ..... .... ... ..... ... ... ..... .... ....... ..... ... ........ Exhibit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T TUSCAN 16 I 1 A 1 Affiliations Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants American Institute of Certified Public Accountants & Company, PA Private Companies Practice Section Tax Division Certified Public Accountants & Consultants INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT Board of Commissioners North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District 1885 Veterans Park Drive Naples, Florida 34109-0492 We have audited the accompanying basic financial statements of North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District (the "District") as of September 30, 2009 and for the year then ended. These basic financial statements are the responsibility of the District's managernent. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these basic financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements of North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District Firefighters' Pension Fund ("Pension Fund"), which represent 100% of the assets, liabilities and net assets as well as 100% of the revenue and expenses of the District's Fiduciary Fund. Those financial statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund, is based on the report of the other auditors. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the basic financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the basic financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estirnates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall basic financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. INTEGRITy......... SERVICE ....... EXPERIE.K'CE 12621 World Plaza Lane. Building 55. Fort Myers. FL 33907 · Phone: (239) 333-2090. Fax: (239) 333-2097 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ~~dl A"1 Board of Commissioners North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District Page 2 In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of other auditors, the basic financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District as of Septernber 30, 2009, and the results of its operations for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated March 31, 2010, on our consideration of the District's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grants, and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of the internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. The Management's Discussion and Analysis on pages i-xi is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the Management's Discussion and Analysis. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the District's basic financial statements taken as a whole. The required supplementary information other than MD&A on pages 47-55 described in the accompanying table of contents is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied by us in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. T~M!AN~~.f-d J ? A. Fort Myers, Florida March 31,2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (MD&A) 1 Al . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161~i A 1 Management's Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Statements FYE 9-30-09 This Discussion and Analysis of the North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District's ("The District") basic financial statements is provided to assist the reader in understanding the District's financial activities and significant changes in ending financial position for the fiscal year ended September 30,2009. The District implemented the requirements of GASB Statement #34 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004. This Statement dramatically changed the District's annual reporting requirements, as well as the financial statement format and presentation. Contained within are the basic financial statements, consisting of the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements and notes to the financial statements. This Discussion and Analysis will also provide an analytical overview of these statements, including comparisons ofthe District's financial position at September 30, 2009 versus September 30, 2008. District Highlights 1. At the conclusion of fiscal year 2009, the District's assets exceeded its liabilities, resulting in net assets of$36,907,116, as compared to net assets at Septernber 30, 20080f$35,589,890. 2. The District's total net assets increased $1,317,226 during fiscal year 2009, as compared to an increase of $6,712,970 in total net assets during fiscal year 2008. 3. The District had $12,423,588 of unrestricted net assets at September 30,2009, that can be used to rneet the District's ongoing obligations, as cornpared to $12,211,914 at September 30,2008. The amount of unrestricted net assets increased by $211,674. 4. Total revenues and other financing sources on the governmental funds basis decreased $2,663,210 or 8 percent, in comparison to the prior year. 5. Total expenditures on the governmental funds basis increased $2,023,338, or 8 percent, in comparison to the prior year. Government-wide Financial Statements Government-wide financial statements (Staternent of Net Assets and Statement of Activities found on pages 3 and 4) are intended to allow a reader to assess a government's operational accountability. Operational accountability is defined as the extent to which the government has met its operating objectives efficiently and effectively, using all resources available for that purpose, and whether it can continue to meet its objectives for the foreseeable future. Government-wide financial statements concentrate on the District as a whole and do not emphasize fund types. The Statement of Net Assets (page 3) presents information on all of the District's assets and liabilities, with the difference between the two reported as net assets. The District's capital assets are included in this statement and reported net of their accumulated depreciation. The Statement of Activities (page 4) presents revenue and expense information showing how the District's net assets changed during the fiscal year. Both statements are measured and reported using the economic resource measurement focus (revenues and BJB/bb 3-22-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 I lA Ii expenses) and the accrual basis of accounting (revenue recognized when earned and expense recognized when incurred). Governmental Fund Financial Statements The accounts of the District are organized on the basis of governmental funds, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity or retained earnings, revenues and expenditures. Government resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purpose for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. Governmental fund financial staternents (found on pages 5 and 7) are prepared on the modified accrual basis using the current financial resources rneasurernent focus. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net current assets. Notes to the Financial Statements The notes to the financial statements explain in detail some of the data contained in the preceding statements and begin on page 11. These notes are essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements. Government-Wide Financial Analysis The government-wide financial statements are designed so that the user can determine if the District's financial condition is better or worse than the prior year. The following is a Condensed Summary Statement of Net Assets for the District (primary Government) at September 30, 2009 and 2008: Summary Statement of Net Assets September 30 Assets: Current and Other Assets Capital Assets Total Assets 2009 $15,760,399 24,483,528 $40.243.927 2008 $14,494,161 24.096,576 $38.590.737 Liabilities: Current Liabilities Non-Current Liabilities Total Liabilities $ 1,735,748 1.601.063 3.336,811 $ 922,370 2,078,477 3,000,847 Net Assets: Invested in Capital Assets, Net of Related Debt Unrestricted Total Net Assets 24,483,528 12,423,588 36.907.116 23,377,976 12,211.914 35.589.890 Total Liabilities and Net Assets $40.243.927 $ 38.590.737 BJBlbb 3-22-10 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 LL A 1 Current and other assets represent 39 percent of total assets at Septernber 30, 2009, as cornpared to 37 percent at Septernber 30, 2008. Current assets at September 30, 2009 are comprised of unrestricted cash balances of $7,051,005, restricted cash of $213,864, investments of $8,083,192 and other assets of $412,338. The balances of unrestricted cash represent amounts that are available for spending at the discretion of the Board of Fire Commissioners of the District. Restricted cash balances are comprised of the impact fee funds restricted for the purchase of capital assets and unspent inspections fee revenue restricted to support the inspection of new construction. The investment in capital assets, net of related debt of $24,483,528, represent 66 percent of net assets at September 30, 2009, as compared to 65 percent at September 30, 2008. These assets are comprised of land, buildings, improvements, equipment, furniture, and vehicles, net of accumulated depreciation, and the outstanding related debt used to purchase the assets. The unrestricted net asset balance of $12,423,588 represents resources available for spending at September 30,2009. Summary of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets For the Years Ended September 30 Revenues: 2009 2008 General Revenues Ad Valorem Taxes $26,670,789 $27,889,425 Miscellaneous Impact Fees 342,496 1,437,474 Investment Earnings 605,567 783,978 Gain on Disp. of Capital Assets 785 -0- Other 230,114 565,482 Program Revenues Charges for Services 580,951 990,945 Grants and Other 67,841 43,843 Total Revenues 28,498,543 31,711,147 Expenses: Public Safety-Fire/ Rescue Service 27,181,317 24,998,1 77 Increase in Net Assets 1,317,226 6,712,970 Net Assets-Beginning of Year 35,589,890 30,496,520 Reclassification -0- (1,619,600) Net Assets-End of Year $ 36,907.116 $35.589.890 BJBlbb 3-22-10 111 l6IlAl -- The assessed value of the property within the District decreased 4 percent for the 2008- 2009 fiscal year as compared to the prior year's assessed value, resulting in a decrease in Ad Valorem tax revenues. This is the first year that property values in the District have decreased, resulting in a decrease in Ad Valorem revenue. Although the property value declined, the Board opted to assess a millage rate of 0.9869, which is lower than the 1 mill rate the District has consistently levied since its inception. The decision to reduce the millage rate was made by the Board in accordance with legislation passed in June of 2007. Because the Board did not adopt the rolled-back rate for the 2007-2008 fiscal year, the District reduced the millage rate for the 2008-2009 fiscal year to comply with statutory requirements. Historically, the increase in Ad Valorem revenue resulting from the increase in property value had been sufficient to provide adequate funds to support operational, capital and reserve financial requirements in the District without increasing the millage rate. —' However, the 2008-2009 General Fund Budget reflects a decrease in Ad Valorem revenue corresponding to the decrease in property value. As a result, it was anticipated that reserves in the amount of$247,442 would be required to fund operations. However, actual revenue received exceeded budgetary projections, and expenditures were less than those budgeted, therefore designated reserves, in the General Fund, were increased by $842,235. The following chart identifies the change in appraised property values in the District and the millage rate maintained by the District. Property Values and Millage Rate Assessed 5.0000 $35,000,000,000 4.5000 - $30,000,000,000 4.0000 3.5000 - $25,000,000,000 ii 3.0000 2.5000 - $20,000,000,000 — � .. $15,000,000,000 2.0000 .. -- 1.5000 . $10,000,000,000 1.0000 ..: - - $5,000,000,000 0.5000 0.0000 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 $ Mal Appraised Property Value $21,933,342,465 $26,409,664,058 $28,799,996,438 $27,676,299,562 Millage Rate 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9869 BJB/bb 3-22-10 iv . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Iii Al Fund Balance - Governmental Fund Financial Statements Staff has worked hard to meet the Board of Fire Commissioners' directive to increase the fund balance and cash reserve of the General Fund to solidify the District's financial position. The total fund balance of the General Fund, comprised entirely of designated reserves, was $14,795,829 at September 30,2009. This fund balance represents an increase of $842,235 over the total fund balance ofthe General Fund at September 30, 2008. In September of 2002, a comprehensive Five Year Plan for the District was developed. This plan is reviewed and revised annually, just prior to preparation of the District's annual budget. The Five Year Plan has become an integral tool to assist in the identification of the financial needs for the future of the District, and as such, has assisted the Board of Fire Commissioners in establishing comprehensive designated reserves to financially provide for the identified needs ofthe District. The fund balance of$14,795,829 for the fiscal year ended September 30,2009 is comprised of designated reserves in its entirety. In light of the current and forecasted economic trends and accompanying decrease in property value, the Board determined that the need to build reserves specifically designated to maintain the current level of service was paramount. To that end, in 2008 the Board established a new designated reserve to maintain the level of service in an effort to address anticipated revenue reductions in the 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 fiscal years. In November of 2009, the Board amended the General Fund Budget to provide for the increase in the designated reserve identified as Maintaining the Level of Service. The Board directed that the balance in this designated reserve would reflect the variance in total cash reserve anticipated at September 30, 2009 based on the difference between anticipated revenue and expenditures and actual revenue and expenditures. Other reserves are designated to accommodate the future financial needs of the District as identified in the Five Year Plan as amended in September of 2009. While designated reserves have been established and maintained in accordance with anticipated future needs of the District, it must be noted that the need may arise for the Board to undesignate a portion ofthese reserves to fund the District's operations should assessed property values continue to fall. The following Designated Reserves were approved for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 in coordination with the Five Year Plan and as a result of the anticipated reduction in future General Fund Ad Valorem revenue: Maintaining Level of Service Replacement Radios/Communications GASB 45 Post Employment Benefits Health Insurance Emergency Reserve Operating Reserve Fire Apparatus Building Fund Vehicle Replacement SCBA Replacement Capital Equipment Station #46 Improvements Personal Protective Gear Total Designated Reserves $ 5,413,929 300,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,400,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 100,000 160,000 1,501,000 20,900 100,000 $14.795.829 BJBlbb 3-22-10 v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 'liA ~ These designated reserves have been established by the Board of Fire Commissioners to meet the future needs of the District. As indicated in the District's Five Year Plan, one new station is anticipated to be operational within the next five years, with funds allocated to initial permitting and planning expenditures for three other stations. Due to the recent and dramatic decline in impact fees, and the anticipated revenue reduction resulting from decreasing property values, the Five Year Plan was revised to delay the construction in full on these three other stations. While impact fees can fund the creation of the infrastructure required for these stations, the staffing and maintenance must be funded by the General Fund. These designated reserves are also created to fund the replacement of capital assets originally funded through impact fees. Additionally, significant increases in health insurance, retirement, and other personnel and operating expenses require that funds be set aside, or designated, to prepare for the funding of future expenditures. This is especially necessary in light of the current economic situation and the anticipated impact of the decline in property values statewide, and the resulting revenue reduction resulting from such decline. As evidenced by the following chart, the District's General Fund fund balance has increased $13,837,643 or over 1444 percent since 1999. While the growth in fund balance is significant, it is by no means an unnecessarily high accumulation of funds. Not only has it become evident that the District must be able to provide for operating and personnel expenses in the event of a serious hurricane or other natural disaster, it has become essential for future planning to ensure the financial stability of the District by increasing designated reserves to provide for the future needs of the District in anticipation of dramatic revenue reductions. It is also designed to allow for replacement of capital assets without a planned increase in millage. BJBlbb 3-22-10 VI 6I 1 Al 1 General Fund Fund Balance 1999-2009 $16,000000 $14,000,000 — $12,000,000 O 9/30/99 •9/30/00 $10,000,000 09/30/01 ❑9/30/02 — ■9130103 — S8,000,000 — D9/30/04I •9/30/05 O 9/30/06 •9/30107 $6 000 000 — ■9/30/08 ❑9/30/09 $4.000.000 ---..- -- – __... _ .... -- i $2,000,000 -- -- —..-._ $- • n n 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Impact Fees Impact fee receipts for the year ended September 30, 2009 represent a decrease of $904,567, or 63 percent, as compared to the prior fiscal year. This is the second — consecutive year that the District has realized a significant decrease in impact fee receipts. This dramatic decrease in impact fee receipts is a result of the current economic climate and the related decrease in new construction in the District. This decrease has had a significant effect on the current year impact fee expenses, as well as those anticipated over the course of the next few fiscal years, and has resulted in the extension — of projected opening dates for four new stations the District had intended to open over the course of the next five years. _ The Board of Fire Commissioners has recognized that the growth in the District has been significant over the last several years, and has anticipated the District would reach a point where the growth and resulting impact fees would substantially decrease. However, it was believed that the appropriate increase in rates adopted by the Board in 2007 would partially offset the decrease in construction. Because the decrease in impact fee revenue was so significant, the Five Year Plan was amended to reflect newly calculated — anticipated decreases. BJB/bb 3-22-10 vii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 Inspection Fees Inspection fee receipts for the year ended Septernber 30, 2009 represent a decrease of $348,182 or 43 percent over receipts in the prior fiscal year, as compared to a decrease of $48,795, or 6 percent over the inspection fee receipts for fiscal year 2008 vs. 2007. These inspection fees are received by the District for inspections performed on new construction, and are therefore a function of the number of new structures built and completed in the District. This is the third consecutive year in which the District has realized a decrease in inspection fee receipts. The decrease in receipts over the last three fiscal years has been $440,884, or more than 48 percent. This decrease in inspection fees received is a direct result of the decline in new construction and inspections thereon within the District. The decrease in fees over three consecutive years has resulted in the inability of the revenues of the fund to support the operating budget. As a result, the General Fund has provided financial assistance to support the Inspection Fee Fund. This fund will need to be monitored closely in the future to determine if the General Fund will be required to continue to provide financial assistance to support the Inspection Fee Fund operating costs. Budgetary Highlights Budget versus actual comparisons are reported in the required supplementary information other than management's discussion and analysis on pages 47 through 55. General Fund expenditures were less than those budgeted, with personnel expenditures reflecting $211,557 or 1 percent less than budgeted, Operating Expenditures reflecting $660,868 or 17 percent less than budgeted, and Capital Outlay reflecting $142,174 or 9 percent less than budgeted. Differences between the final amended budget and actual expenditures in the General Fund were largely due to fewer non-essential purchases being made, and the serious effort exerted to control expenditures as tightly as possible faced with current and anticipated decrease in property (Ad Valorem) tax revenue. The amendments to General Fund revenue were necessary to reflect an increase in Ad Valorem tax revenue received resulting in collection above the 95 percent subject to budget requirements and to accommodate funds received from the origination of a lease to purchase a fire engine. The amendments to the General Fund expenditures were a result of several factors. Budgeted personnel expenses were reduced by $487,591 to reflect decreases in health insurance premiums and worker's compensation rates, as well as a decrease in the amount of vacation liability paid out. Budgeted operating expenses were decreased by $177,734 to reflect reduced computer maintenance and professional fee expenditures. Budgeted capital expenditures were increased by $502,113 to reflect the purchase of property for a future station site. Finally, budgeted debt service payments were increased by $1,198,090 to reflect the early payrnent of the lump sum loan payment due in November of 2009 on a land loan, as well as payment in full of an engine lease established in May of 2009. BJBlbb 3-22-10 V111 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 l.l A I Non-depreciable capital assets include land and construction in progress. Depreciable assets include buildings, improvements other than buildings, equipment, furniture and vehicles. Capital Assets The following is a schedule ofthe District's capital assets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008. Capital Assets September 30, 2009 and 2008 Capital Assets 2009 2008 Land $11,182,814 $10,728,291 Construction in Progress 667 .460 480.363 Total Capital Assets not Depreciated 11,850,274 11,208,654 Buildings 12,233,366 12,061,899 Vehicles 7,743,272 7,610,439 Office Equipment 710,211 654,430 Equipment & Machinery 2.548.955 2.642.630 Total Capital Assets Being Depreciated 23,235,804 22,969,398 Accumulated Depreciation Buildings ( 3,368,356) ( 2,973,642) Vehicles ( 4,975,807) ( 4,921,524) Office Equipment ( 427,025) ( 369,580) Equipment & Machinery ( 1.83 1.362) ( 1.816.730) Total Accumulated Depreciation (10.602.550) (10.081.476) Total Capital Assets being Depreciated, Net 12.633.254 12.887.922 Capital Assets - Net of Depreciation 24,483,528 24,096,576 Related Debt -0- (718.600) Net Assets Invested in Capital Assets Net of Related Debt $ 24.483.528 $ 23.377.976 Significant capital asset purchases made during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 include: 1. The purchase of 6.8 acres of land located adjacent to property already owned by the District for a future station site in the amount of $454,523; 2. Purchase of Velocity Pumper replacernent fire engine in the amount of $527,590; 3. Renovation to the training room at Station #45 to address air conditioning and mold issues in the amount of$71,509; 4. Replacement of bay doors at Station #44 in the amount of$46,953; BJBtbb 3-22-10 IX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 I ]. Al 5. Payment of architecture, engineering and permitting fees for future Station #48 located on Livingston Road in the amount of$187,097; these expenditures could have been funded by impact fees, but receipts were not sufficient to fund these expenses so the General Fund provided funding; 6. Purchase and installation of a boat lift located at the boat slip for the District's fire and rescue boat in the amount of$12,940; 7. Purchase of 16 sets of replacement bunker gear in the amount of $22,240; 8. Purchase of a Bauer air compressor fill system in the amount of $41 ,982; and 9. Purchase of computer hardware totaling $29,795. For additional information on the District's capital assets, see Note E on pages 27 and 28. Debt Administration As of September 30, 2009, the District had outstanding debt $2,519,610, as compared to $2,132,066 at September 30, 2008. That debt consists of: 1. Compensated absences (accrued vacation liability) in the amount of$1,356,623, as compared to $1,413,466 at September 30, 2008. The decrease in this liability is due to the payment in full of accrued time or reclassification as termination benefits for those employees participating in the early retirement incentive program. 2. Termination benefits in the amount of$1,162,987 consisting of wages and benefits due through September 30,2010, and health, dental, and vision insurance benefits through 2012 for those employees participating in the District's early retirement incentive program. Economic Facts and Next Year's Budget Millage Rates The following factors were taken into consideration when the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010 was prepared: 1. Appraised taxable property values decreased by $2,485,923,083 or 9 percent for fiscal year 2009 as compared to a decrease of 4 percent in 2008. This is the second consecutive year that the property value in the District has decreased. The cumulative effect of the last two years' decline in property value is an anticipated reduction in Ad Valorem revenue ofapproxirnate1y $3.6 million, or 12.5 percent. The decrease in 2009-2010 property value was anticipated, and the staff, under the Board's direction, has worked hard to control expenditures and increase reserves. The decrease in property value was less than the anticipated 15 percent. The decline in property value is expected to continue for the 2010-2011 and 2011- 2012 fiscal years. Because of these anticipated decreases in revenue, and because the District has no means to substantially make up for the anticipated shortfall in revenue, the 2009-2010 General Fund budget reflects the anticipated expenditure of just under $2 million of designated reserves to fund the operating budget and maintain the level of service. The District must now consider ways to continue to fund operating expenses without reducing the level of service and withoutadepleting reserves. BJBlbb 3-22-10 x . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 , 1 A 1 2. The District did not reduce its millage rate from 1 mill ($1.00 for each $1,000 of appraised property value) for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010. The rolled-back millage rate, that is, the rate that would need to be levied to generate the same revenue for the 2009-2010 fiscal year as was generated during the 2008- 2009 fiscal year, was not levied because it exceeded the rnaximum millage rate the District is authorized to levy pursuant to its enabling act. The District's millage cap, combined with declining property values, makes it impossible to generate the same revenue as in prior years. Therefore, the District must fund operations with less revenue, while continuing to attempt to maintain service levels. 3. The District had planned to open Stations #48, #49, #410 and #411 within the next two to five years. However, due to the estimated dramatic reduction in revenue resulting from the anticipated and realized decline in property value, and the dramatic reduction in impact fees received, all construction of new station sites, except for the engineering and architecture fees required to complete the permitting process for Station #48, has been halted. 4. No new positions are provided for in the General Fund Budget for 2009-2010. Thirteen employees participated in the early retirernent incentive program established by the Board for the 2008-2009 fiscal year. As a result, 9 shift positions were vacated. The 2009-2010 General Fund Budget contains provisions to fill only three ofthese vacated positions. Because of the anticipated continued reductions in revenue, the intent is to retain as much of the General Fund reserves as possible to avoid potential personnel reductions in the 2010-2011 fiscal year. 5. Capital purchases have been limited to only those essential items, including the replacement of the concrete drive at Stations #40 and #44 in the total amount of $200,000, the purchase of an emergency generator for Station #40 in the amount of $58,000, the installation of a vehicle exhaust system at Station #43 totaling $29,000 and the replacement of two air conditioning units at Station #45 in the amount of $30,000. Request for Information This financial report is designed to provide the reader an overview of the District. Questions regarding any information provided in this report should be directed to: Becky Bronsdon, Assistant Chief of Administrative Services, North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District, 1885 Veteran's Park Drive, Naples, FL 34109,239-597-3222, e-mail: bbronsdon@northnaplesfire.com. BlB/bb 3-22-10 Xl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS September 30, 2009 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Restricted cash and cash equivalents Investments Due from other governments Other receivables Other assets Total current assets Noncurrent assets: Capital assets: Land Construction in progress Depreciable buildings, equipment, and vehicles (net of $10,602,550 accumulated depreciation) Total noncurrent assets TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued expenses Contract deposits Deferred revenue Current portion of long-term obligations Total current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities: Noncurrent portion of long-term obligations TOTAL LIABILITIES NET ASSETS Invested in capital assets, net of related debt Unrestricted TOTAL NET ASSETS TOTAL LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS The accompanying notes are an integral part of this staternent. Page 3 of 59 Governmental Activities $ 7,051,005 213,864 8,083,192 361,292 42,349 8,697 15,760,399 11,182,814 667,460 12.633.254 24.483.528 $ 40,243,927 $ 610,790 16,000 190,411 918,547 1,735,748 1,601,063 3,336,811 24,483,528 12,423,588 36,907,116 $ 40,243,927 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES Year Ended September 30,2009 EXPENSES Governmental Activities Public Safety - Fire Protection Personal services Operating expenses Depreciation Interest and fiscal charges TOTAL EXPENSES - GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES PROGRAM REVENUES Charges for services Operating grants and contributions NET PROGRAM EXPENSES GENERAL REVENUES Ad Valorem taxes Impact fees Interest Gain on disposition of capital assets Other TOTAL GENERAL REVENUES INCREASE IN NET ASSETS NET ASSETS - Beginning of the year NET ASSETS - End of the year The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 1611A~1 Page 4 of 59 Governmental Activities $ 22,781,089 3,238,389 1,100,913 60,926 27, 1 81 ,3 1 7 580,951 67,841 26,532,525 26,670,789 342,496 605,567 785 230,114 27,849,751 1,317,226 35,589,890 $ 36,907,116 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 4,.1 .~ NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT BALANCE SHEET-GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS September 30, 2009 Page 5 of 59 Total General Impact Fee Inspection Fee Governmental Fund Fund Fund Funds ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 7,051,005 $ - $ $ 7,05 I ,005 Restricted cash and cash equivalents 135,457 78,407 213,864 Investments 8,083,192 8,083,192 Due from other governments 248,763 65,904 46,625 361,292 Due from other funds 12,903 2,940 22,337 38,180 Other receivables 42,349 42,349 Other assets 8,697 8,697 TOTAL ASSETS $ 15,446,909 $ 204,301 $ 147,369 $ 15,798,579 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE LIABILITIES Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 609,803 $ 987 $ $ 610,790 Due to other funds 25,277 12,903 38,180 Contract deposits 16,000 16,000 Deferred revenue 190,411 190,411 TOTAL LIABILITIES 651,080 204,301 855,381 FUND BALANCE Unreserved, reported in: General Fund: Designated 14,795,829 14,795,829 Undesignated Special Revenue Funds: Designated (deficit) 147,369 147,369 TOTAL FUND BALANCE 14,795,829 147,369 14,943,198 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE $ 15,446,909 $ 204,30 I $ 147,369 $ 15,798,579 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this staternent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS Septem ber 30, 2009 Total fund balance of governmental funds Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Assets are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not [mancial resources and therefore are not reported in the governmental funds. Capital assets not being depreciated: Land Construction in progress Governmental capital assets being depreciated: Building, Equipment and VehicJes Less accumulated depreciation Long-term obligations are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the funds. Early termination benefits Compensated absences Elimination of interfund amounts: Due to other funds Due from other funds Total net assets of governmental activities The accompanying notes are an integral part of this staternent. 11,182,814 667,460 23,235,804 (10,602,550) (1,162,987) (1,356,623) (38,180) 38.1 80 Page 6 of 59 Amount $ 14,943,198 11,850,274 12,633,254 (2,519,610) $36,907,116 . , . 16 't 1 f\ 1 . . NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT Page 7 of 59 STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND . CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE-GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS . Year Ended September 30, 2009 Total . General Impact Fee Inspection Fee Governmental Fund Fund Fund Funds . REVENUES . Ad Valorem taxes $ 26,670,789 $ - $ - $ 26,670,789 Intergovernmental revenue 67,841 67,841 . Charges for services: . Inspection fees and other 119,720 461,231 580,951 Impact fees 342,496 342,496 . Miscellaneous: Interest 600,040 3,506 2,021 605,567 . Other 230,114 230,114 . TOTAL REVENUES 27,688,504 346,002 463,252 28,497,758 . EXPENDITURES Current . Public safety . Personal services 21,379,100 295,845 21,674,945 Operating expenditures 3,198,514 39,875 3,238,389 . Capital outlay 1,509,669 1,509,669 Debt service . Principal reduction 1,246,190 1,246,190 . Interest and fiscal charges 62,975 62,975 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,396,448 39,875 295,845 27,732,168 . EXCESS OF REVENUES . OVER EXPENDITURES 292,056 306,127 167,407 765,590 . OTHER FINANCING SOURCES . Proceeds from disposition of capital assets 22,589 22,589 Proceeds from capital lease 527,590 527,590 . TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 550,179 550,179 . EXCESS OF REVENUES AND . OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER EXPENDITURES 842,235 306,127 167,407 1,315,769 . FUND BALANCE - Beginning of the year 13,953,594 (306,127) (20,038) 13,627,429 . . FUND BALANCE - End of the year $ 14,795,829 $ - $ 147,369 $ 14,943,198 . . The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 I lA 1 f NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT Page 8 of 59 RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES Year Ended September 30,2009 Net change (revenues and other fmancing sources over expenditures and other fmancing uses) in fund balance - total governmental funds The increase (change) in net assets reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities is different because: Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. In the Statement of Activities, however, the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. The loss on disposal of capital assets reduces the increase in net assets. Expenditures for capital assets Less: proceeds on disposition of capital assets Add: gain on disposition of capital assets Less: current year depreciation The issuance of debt is reported as a fmancing source in governmental funds and thus contributes to the change in fund balance. In the Statement of Net Assets, however, issuing debt increases long-term liabilities and does not affect the Statement of Activities. Similarly, repayment of principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds but reduces the liability in the Statement of Net Assets. Borrowings (proceeds from issuance): Capital lease Repayments (principal retirement): Capital lease Note payable Some expenses reported in the Statement of Activities do not require the use of current fmancial resources and therefore are not reported as expenditures in the governmental funds. Decrease in accrued interest payable on long term debt Decrease in compensated absences Increase in termination benefits Increase in net assets of governmental activities The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 1,509,669 (22,589) 785 (1,100,913) (527,590) 527,590 718,600 2,049 56,843 (1,162,987) Amount $ 1,315,769 386,952 (527,590) 1,246,190 (1,104,095) $ 1,317,226 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1611A'i NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET ASSETS - FIDUCIARY FUND September 30, 2009 ASSETS Investments, at fair value: Money market funds Mutual funds Common stocks U.S. Government securities Corporate bonds Due from other governments Due from District Due from plan participants Accrued investment income TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS LIABILITIES Accrued expenses Deferred contributions - prepaid district contributions TOTAL LIABILITIES NET ASSETS Held in trust for pension benefits and other purposes TOTAL NET ASSETS TOTAL LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. Page 9 of 59 Firefighters' Pension Fund $ 3,307,370 1,647,788 6,563,868 2,272,418 3,463,334 361,408 171,164 5,321 63,738 $ 17,856,409 $ 23,348 23,348 $ 17,833,061 17,833,061 17,856,409 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 It!" Al NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT Page 1 0 of 59 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET ASSETS - FIDUCIARY FUND Year Ended September 30, 2009 Firefighters' Pension Fund ADDITIONS Contributions: Employer $ 2,039,807 Plan members, made by employer on behalf of employee 37,846 Buybacks 33,580 State of Florida, insurance premiums 1,039,931 Total contributions 3.l5U64 Investment income: Net appreciation (depreciation) in fair value of investments 1,147,227 Net Realized gain (loss) (1,142,836) Interest and dividends 386,259 390,650 Less: investment expenses (73,071) Net investment income (loss) 317,579 Other income 104 TOTAL ADDITIONS 3,468,847 DEDUCTIONS Refunds of contributions Administrative expenses 75,921 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS 75,921 NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS 3,392,926 NET ASSETS - BEGINNING 14,440,135 NET ASSETS - ENDING $ 17,833,061 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 I 1 A~ NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 11 of 59 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Ore:anization North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District (the "District") is an independent special taxing district located in northern Collier County, Florida. The District was originally established by Laws of Florida, Chapter 61-2032 and Florida Statute 633.15, then reestablished by Laws of Florida Chapter 84-416, as amended. The District's governing legislation was recreated, reenacted and codified by Laws of Florida, Chapter 99-450 on July 13, 1999 and amended by Laws of Florida, Chapter 2006-353 on June 23, 2006. The District is governed by a five (5) member elected Board of Commissioners. Commissioners serve on a staggered four (4) year term basis. The District provides fire control and protection services, fire safety, inspections, code enforcement, fire hydrant maintenance, firefighter training, and crash and fire rescue services as well as basic life support services. In providing these services, the District operates and maintains seven (7) stations and the related equipment and employs approximately 160 full-time professional firefighters and administrative staff. During the year ended September 30, 2009, the District entered into a joint venture agreement with Edison State College (ESC) for the operation of the North Naples Fire Training Center (NNFTC) to educate and train students as State Certified Firefighters. The District is licensed to operate the NNFTC and ESC is the program coordinator. The District provides the training room and training facilities for the NNFTC. ESC, as program coordinator, is responsible for the operations of the NNFTC including but not limited to the screening and enrolling of students and for screening and engaging instructors. Therefore, the activities of the NNFTC are not included in the District's basic financial statements. Reportine: Entity The District adheres to Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GAS B) Statement Number 14, "Financial Reporting Entity," (GASB 14) as amended by GASB Statement Number 39, "Determining Whether Certain Organizations Are Component Units" (GASB 39). This Statement requires the basic financial statements of the District (the primary government) to include its component units, if any. A component unit is a legally separate organization for which the elected officials of the primary government are financially accountable. Based on the criteria established in GASB 14, as amended, there are no component units required to be included in the District's basic financial statements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A-l1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 12 of 59 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED Government-wide Financial Statements The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the Statement of Net Assets and the Statement of Activities) report information on all of the activities of the District and do not emphasize fund types. These governmental activities comprise the primary government. General governmental and intergovernmental revenues support the governmental activities. The purpose ofthe government-wide financial statements is to allow the user to be able to determine if the District is in a better or worse financial position than the prior year. The effect of all interfund activity between governmental funds has been removed from the government-wide financial statements. Government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the pension fund financial statements. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues, expenses, gains, losses, assets, and liabilities resulting from exchange and exchange-like transactions are recognized when the exchange takes place. Revenues, expenses, gains, losses, assets, and liabilities resulting from nonexchange transactions are recognized in accordance with the requirements of GASB Statement Number 33, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Nonexchange Transactions" (GASB 33). Amounts paid to acquire capital assets are capitalized as assets in the government-wide financial statements rather than reported as expenditures. Proceeds of long-term debt are recorded as liabilities in the government-wide financial statements rather than as other financing sources. Amounts paid to reduce long-term indebtedness of the reporting government are reported as a reduction of the related liability in the government-wide financial statements rather than as expenditures. The Statement of Activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or segment. Program revenues include: 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function, and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital improvements of a particular function. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ~~1 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 13 of 59 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED Government-wide Financial Statements. continued Program revenues are considered to be revenues generated by services performed and/or by fees charged such as inspection fees, bum permits, and hydrant tests. Fund Financial Statements The accounts of the District are organized on the basis of funds, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity or retained earnings, revenues, and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate. Government resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purpose for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. Fund financial statements for the District's governmental and fiduciary funds are presented after the government-wide financial statements. These statements display information about major funds individually and nonmajor funds in aggregate for governmental funds. The fiduciary statement includes financial information for the firefighters' pension fund. The fiduciary fund represents assets held by the District in a custodial capacity for the benefit of other individuals. Governmental Funds When both restricted and unrestricted resources are combined in a fund, expenditures are considered to be paid first from restricted resources, as appropriate, and then from unrestricted resources. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collected within the current period or soon thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. The District's major funds are presented in separate columns on the governmental fund financial statements. The definition of a major fund is one that meets certain criteria set forth in GASB Statement Number 34, "Basic Financial Statements - and Management's Discussion and Analysis - for State and Local Governments" (GASB 34). The funds that do not meet the criteria of a major fund are considered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 I Al NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 14 of 59 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED Governmental Funds. continued non-major funds and are combined into a single column on the governmental fund financial statements. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds. Major individual governmental funds are reported in separate columns on the fund financial statements. Fiduciarv Fund The pension trust fund accounts for the activities ofthe Firefighters' Pension Plan, which accumulates resources for the pension benefit payments to qualified firefighters. The net assets of this fund are not considered to be net assets of the District and not available to the District's creditors. Measurement Focus and Basis of Accountine: Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures or expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the basic financial statements. Basis of accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements have been met. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period and soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the District considers tax revenues to be available if they are collected within sixty days of the end of the current fiscal period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 J 1 A I NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 15 of 59 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED Measurement Focus and Basis of Accountine:. continued Revenues susceptible to accrual are property taxes, interest on investments, and intergovernmental revenues. Property taxes are recorded as revenues in the fiscal year in which they are levied, provided they are collected in the current period or within sixty days thereafter. Interest on invested funds is recognized when earned. Intergovernmental revenues that are reimbursements for specific purposes or projects are recognized when all eligibility requirements are met. Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred. Exceptions to this general rule include: (1) principal and interest on long-term debt, if any, is recognized when due; and (2) expenditures are generally not divided between years by the recording of prepaid expenditures. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the District's policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government-wide financial statements. Non-current Government Assets/Liabilities GASB 34 requires non-current governmental assets, such as land and buildings, and non-current governmental liabilities, such as notes payable and capital leases, to be reported in the governmental activities column in the government-wide Statement of Net Assets. Maior Funds The District reports the following major governmental funds: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 16 of 59 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED Maior Funds. continued The General Fund is the District's primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the District, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The Impact Fee Fund consists of fees imposed and collected by Collier County based on new construction within the District. The fees are restricted and can only be used for certain capital expenditures associated with growth within the District. Non-Maior Fund The District reports the following non-major fund: The Inspection Fee Fund is used by the District to account for the receipt and expenditures of its Inspection Fee Program. Fees are charged for the inspection of new building construction. The fees are collected by Collier County and are distributed by the East Naples Fire Control and Rescue District to the other participating Districts. Fiduciary Fund Fiduciary funds are excluded in the government-wide financial statements because the resources of those funds are not available to support the District's programs. The only type of fiduciary funds the District maintains is a Firefighters' Pension Fund, which accounts for retirement assets held by the Plan that are payable to qualified firefighters upon retirement. Bude:etary Information The District has elected to report budgetary comparisons of its major funds and its non-major fund as required supplementary information (RSI). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 17 of 59 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED Investments The District adheres to the requirements of GASB Statement Number 31, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools," (GASB 31) in which all investments are reported at fair value. Investments, including restricted investments, consist of certificates of deposit, U.S. Government securities, corporate debt and equity securities, and securities of government agencies unconditionally guaranteed by the U.S. Government. Capital Assets Capital assets, which include land, construction in progress, buildings, equipment and vehicles, are reported in the government-wide Statement of Net Assets. The District follows a capitalization policy which calls for capitalization of all capital assets that have a cost or donated value of $1 ,000 or more and have a useful life in excess of one year. All capital assets are valued at historical cost, or estimated historical cost if actual historical cost is not available. Donated capital assets are valued at their estimated fair market value on the date donated. Public domain (infrastructure) capital assets consisting of certain improvements other than building, including curbs, gutters and drainage systems, are not capitalized, as the District generally does not acquire such assets. No debt-related interest expense is capitalized as part of capital assets in accordance with GASB 34. Maintenance, repairs and minor renovations are not capitalized. The acquisition of land and construction projects utilizing resources received from Federal and State agencies are capitalized when the related expenditure is incurred. Expenditures that materially increase values, change capacities or extend useful lives are capitalized. Upon sale or retirement, the cost is eliminated from the respective accounts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 I 1 A 2' NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 18 of 59 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED Capital Assets. continued Expenditures for capital assets are recorded in the fund statements as current expenditures. However, such expenditures are not reflected as expenditures in the government-wide statements, but rather are capitalized and depreciated. Depreciable capital assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: Capital Asset Years Buildings 15-30 Capital Assets acquired under Capital Lease 10 Office Equipment 3-30 Vehicles 3-10 Equipment and Machinery 3-15 Bude:ets and bude:etarv accountine: The District adopted an annual budget for the General Fund. The District adopted annual budgets for the Special Revenue Funds - Impact Fee Fund and the Inspection Fee Fund. No budget was adopted or required to be adopted for the Pension Trust Fund. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Septem ber 30, 2009 Page 19 of 59 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED Bude:ets and bude:etarv accountine:. continued The District follows these procedures in establishing budgetary data for the General Fund, the Impact Fee Fund, and the Inspection Fee Fund: 1. During the summer of each year, the District Fire Chief submits to the Board of Commissioners a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing on the upcoming October 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. 2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments. 3. The budget is adopted by approval of the Board of Commissioners. 4. Budget amounts, as shown in these basic financial statements, are as originally adopted or as amended by the Board of Commissioners. 5. The budget is adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 6. The level of control for appropriations is exercised at the fund level. 7. Appropriations lapse at year-end. Several budget amendments were approved by the Board of Commissioners during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 for the General Fund. Budgeted expenditures in the General Fund were increased by $3,854,766. No budget amendments were approved for the Impact Fee Fund or the Inspection Fee Fund. Impact fees/deferred revenue The District levies an impact fee on new construction within the District. The intent of the fee is for growth within the District to pay for capital improvements needed due to the growth. The fee is imposed and collected by Collier County and remitted to the District. The fee is refundable if not expended by the District within six (6) years from the date of collection. The District, therefore, records this fee as restricted cash and deferred revenue until the date of expenditure, at which time it is recognized as revenue and charged to capital outlay in the fund financial statements and capital assets in the government-wide financial statements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 20 of 59 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED Due to/from other funds Interfund receivables and payables arise from interfund transactions and are recorded by funds affected in the period in which the transactions are executed. Due from other e:overnments No allowance for losses on uncollectible accounts has been recorded since the District considers all amounts to be fully collectible. Compensated absences The District's employees accumulate annual leave based on the number of years of continuous service. Upon termination of employment, employees can receive payment of accumulated annual leave if certain criteria are met. The costs of accumulated annual leave benefits (compensated absences) are expended in the respective operating funds when payments are made to employees. However, the liability for all accrued vacation and personal leave benefits is recorded in the government-wide Statement of Net Assets. Encumbrances Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts and other commitments for the expenditure of monies are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation, is not employed by the District because, at present, it is not necessary in order to assure effective budgetary control or to facilitate effective cash planning and control. Manaeement estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenditures during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16tlf11A 1. NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 21 of 59 NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED Fund equity In the governmental fund financial statements, reservation of fund balance indicates amounts that are limited for a specific purpose, are not appropriable for expenditure, or are legally segregated for a specific future use. Designations of fund balance represent tentative management plans. Unreserved, undesignated fund balance indicates funds that are available for current expenditure. Interfund transactions The District considers interfund receivables (due from other funds) and interfund payables (due to other funds) to be loan transactions to and from other funds to cover temporary (three months or less) cash needs. Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for expenditures/expenses initially made from it that are properly applicable to another fund are recorded as expenditures/expenses in the reimbursing funds and as reduction of expenditures/expenses in the fund that is reimbursed. Such amounts are eliminated in the Government-wide Financial Statements. Subsequent events Subsequent events have been evaluated through March 31, 2010, which is the date the basic financial statements were available to be issued. NOTE B - CASH AND CASH EQUIV ALENTS Cash and cash equivalents of the primary government (exclusive of the Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund) were $7,264,869, of which $213,864 was restricted. Total cash and cash equivalents included cash on hand of$1,150 at September 30, 2009. Deposits The District's deposit policy allows deposits to be held in demand deposit, money market accounts and the Florida State Board of Administration - Local Government Surplus Trust Fund (SBA). All District depositories are institutions designated as qualified depositories by the State Treasurer at September 30, 2009. The District adheres to GASB Statement Number 31, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools." Under this Statement, the District has elected to show all investments at fair value, with the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 J.Al NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 22 of 59 NOTE B - CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, CONTINUED Deposits. continued exception of the Local Government Surplus Funds Investment Pool Fund (State Board of Administration), an external2a7 -like investment pool. The Local Government Surplus Funds Investments Pool Trust Fund's shares are stated at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. These investments are subject to the risk that the market value of an investment, collateral protecting a deposit or securities underlying a repurchase agreements, will decline. Deposits consist of the following at September 30, 2009: Carrying Bank District Amount Balance Unrestricted General Fund Depository Accounts $ 1,143,085 $ 1,809,452 Money Market 5,906,136 5,906,136 SBA 634 634 Total General Fund $ 7,049,855 $ 7,716,222 Restricted Special Revenue Funds Impact Fee Depository Accounts $ 135,457 $ 138,032 Inspection Fee Depository Accounts 78,407 78,407 Total Special Revenue Funds $ 213,864 $ 216,439 The District's deposits were entirely covered by federal depository insurance or by collateral pursuant to the Public Depository Security Act (Florida Statute 280) of the State of Florida except for the $634 held in the SBA. Bank balances approximate market value. The District held no other types of deposits during the year ended September 30, 2009. The local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund is not required to be categorized because the investments are not evidenced by securities that exist in physical or book entry form. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 1'1 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 23 of 59 NOTE B - CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, CONTINUED Restricted cash and equivalents The following is a brief description of the restrictions on cash and cash equivalents: The Impact Fee account is used to account for the deposit of impact fees received and is restricted for certain capital asset acquisition associated with growth within the District. Impact fees are collected by Collier County for the District pursuant to County ordinance and District resolution. The Inspection Fee account is used to account for inspection fees collected by the District for performing fire inspections within the District. Such revenue is restricted for inspection service related costs. NOTE C - INVESTMENTS District - Investments Investments of the District (primary govemment)(exclusive of the Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund) were $8,083,192 (both carrying value and market value) at September 30, 2009 and consisted of certificates of deposit which were designated as public funds with a qualified public depository, and were, therefore, entirely collateralized pursuant to the Public Depository Security Act (Florida Statute 280) of the State of Florida. Firefie:hters Pension Plan - Investments Investments held in the Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund totaled $17,254,778 (including $3,307,370 in money market funds, $1,647,788 in equity mutual funds, $6,563,868 in equity securities and $5,735,752 in fixed income securities) at September 30,2009. Such investments are administered by Firefighters' Pension Board policy. This policy provides for investments in money markets, mutual funds, treasury notes, federal agency guaranteed securities, corporate bonds, notes and/or equities, and real estate. The Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund accounts for resources held to fund the respective firefighter employee pension benefits. The Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund investments were held by a financial and investment institution and insured up to certain limits specific to the trustee/custodian institution and retirement trust funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 I 1 A"l NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 24 of 59 NOTE C - INVESTMENTS, CONTINUED Firefie:hters Pension Plan - Investments. continued Investment Authorization: The Plan's investment policy is determined by the Plan's Board of Trustees. The policy has been designed by the Board to conduct the operations of the Plan in a manner so that the assets will provide the pension and other benefits provided under applicable laws, preserving principal while maximizing the rate of return. The Trustees are authorized to acquire and retain every kind of property (real, personal or mixed) and every kind of investment specifically including, but not by way of limitation, money markets, mutual funds, bonds, debentures, stocks (preferred or common) and other corporate obligations. Investments are carried at quoted market prices at September 30, 2009. Interest and dividend revenues are recorded as earned. Purchases and sales of investments are recorded on the trade-date basis. Unrealized gains and losses are presented as net appreciation (depreciation) in fair value of investments on the statement of changes in plan net assets along with gains and losses realized on sales of investments. Given the inherent nature of investments, it is reasonably possible that changes in the value of those investments will occur in the near term and that such changes could materially affect the amounts reported in the statements of plan net assets. Investment in all equity securities shall be limited to those listed on a major U.S. stock exchange and limited to no more than 62.5% (at market) of the Plan's total asset value. The equity position in anyone company shall not exceed 5% of the Plan's total assets at market. Investments in stock of foreign companies shall be limited to 10% of the value ofthe Plan's total assets at market. No more than 15% of the equity securities are to be invested in small or mid-cap stocks. The fixed income portfolio shall be compromised of securities rated in the highest three (3) categories of quality by a major rating service. Except for Treasury and Agency obligations, the debt portion of the Fund shall contain no more than 10% of a given issuer irrespective of the number of differing issues. The current target allocation of these investments at market is as follows: Authorized Investments Domestic Equities Fixed Income International Equities Target % of Portfolio 50% 40% 10% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 , 1 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 25 of 59 NOTE C - INVESTMENTS, CONTINUED Interest Rate Risk: Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to change in market interest rates. As a means of limiting its exposure to interest rate risk, the Plan diversifies its investments by security type and institution, and limits holdings in anyone type of investment with anyone issuer with various durations of maturities. Information about the sensitivity ofthe fair values of the Plan's fixed income investments to market interest rate fluctuations is provided by the following table that shows the distribution of the Plan's investment by maturity at September 30, 2009: Investment Maturities (in years) Investment Type Fair Value Less than 1 1 to 5 6 to 10 U.S. Agenciesffreasuries $ 2,272,418 $ 750,197 $ 875,520 $ 646,701 Corporate bonds 3,463,334 560,071 2,118,664 784,599 $ 5,735,752 $ 1,310,268 $ 2,994,184 $ 1,431,300 Credit Risk: Credit risk is the risk that a security or a portfolio will lose some or all of its value due to a real or perceived change in the ability of the issuer to repay its debt. The Plan's investment policy utilizes portfolio diversification in order to control this risk. The following table discloses credit rating by fixed income investment type at September 30, 2009, if applicable: U.S. government guaranteed* Quality rating of credit risk debt securities Aa2 Aa3 Al A2 A3 Total credit risk debt securities Fair Value $2,272,418 Percentage of Portfolio 13.17 % $ 480,497 110,031 1,437,585 1,245,967 189,254 $3,463,334 2.78 % 0.64 8.33 7.22 1.10 20.07 % * Obligations of the U.S. government or obligations explicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government are not considered to have credit risk and do not have purchase limitations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 I 1 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 26 of 59 NOTE C - INVESTMENTS, CONTINUED Concentration of Credit Risk: The investments policy of the Plan contains limitations on the amount that can be invested in anyone issuer as well maximum portfolio allocation percentages. There were no individual investments that represented 5% or more of Plan net assets at September 30, 2009. Custodial Credit Risk: This is the risk that in the event of the failure of the counterparty, the plan will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. This risk is generally measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Consistent with the Plan's investment policy, the investments are held by Plan's custodial bank and registered in the Plan's name. NOTE D - DUE TO/FROM OTHER FUNDS Interfund receivables and payables at September 30, 2009 are as follows: Due from Due to Fund other funds other funds General Fund: Impact Fee Fund $ 12,903 $ 2,940 Inspection Fee Fund 22,337 Total General Fund 12,903 25,277 Special Revenue Funds: Impact Fee Fund General Fund 2,940 12,903 Inspection Fee Fund General Fund 22,337 Total Special Revenue Funds 25,277 12,903 Total $ 38,180 $ 38,180 Interfund receivables and payables were eliminated for presentation purposes in the Statement of Net Assets at September 30, 2009. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 tl A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 27 of 59 NOTE E - CAPITAL ASSETS ACTIVITY The following is a summary of changes in capital assets activity for the year ended September 30, 2009: Balance at Balance at October I Increases! Decreases/ Adjustments! September 30 2008 Additions Retirements Reclassifications 2009 Capital Assets Not Being Depreciated: Land $ 10,728,291 $ 454,523 $ - $ - S 11,182,814 Construction in Progress 480,363 187,097 667,460 Total Capital Assets Not Being Depreciated 11,208,654 641,620 11,850,274 Capital Assets Being Depreciated: Buildings 12,061,899 171,467 12,233,366 Office Equipment 654,430 83,370 (27,589) 710,211 Vehicles 7,610,439 527,590 (394,757) 7,743,272 Equipment & Machinery 2.642.630 85.622 (I 79.297) 2,548,955 Total Capital Assets Being Depreciated 22,969,398 868,049 (601,643) 23,235,804 Less Accumulated Depreciation: Buildings (2,973,642) (394,714) (3,368,356) Office Equipment (369,580) (82,541 ) 25,096 (427,025) Vehicles (4,921,524) (449,040) 394,757 ( 4,975,807) Equipment & Machinery (1.816.730) (174.618) 159.986 ( 1 ,831 ,362) Total Accumulated Depreciation (10,081,476) (1,100,913) 579,839 ( 1 0,602,550) Total Capital Assets being Depreciated, Net 12,887,922 (232,864) (21,804) 12,633,254 Capital Assets, Net $ 24,096,576 S 408,756 $ (21,804) $ 24,483,528 Related debt Net assets invested in capital assets, net of related debt S 24,483,528 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 28 of 59 NOTE E - CAPITAL ASSETS ACTIVITY, CONTINUED Depreciation expense was charged to the following functions during the year ended September 30,2009: Amount General Government Total Depreciation Expense $1,100,913 NOTE F - LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS The following is a summary of changes in long-term obligations for the year ended September 30, 2009: Note Payable - Series 2004 Capital Lease Termination Benefits Compensated Absences Balance Retirements Balance Amounts October 1 And September 30 Due Within 2008 Additions Adjustments 2009 One Year $ 718,600 $ - $ (718,600) $ - $ 527,590 (527,590) 1,162,987 1,162,987 918,547 1.413.466 (56.843) 1,356,623 $ 2,132,066 $ 1,690,577 $ (1,303,033) $ 2,519,610 $ 918,547 The following is a summary of long-term obligations at September 30, 2009: $912,500 note payable, Series 2004, payable monthly for 59 months to a financial institution in the amount of $6,542 including interest at 3.54%, with with a final payment of all unpaid principal and accrued interest of $662,444 on November 1,2009. The note is collateralized by impact fees and non-ad valorem revenues of the District (paid from the General Fund). During the year ended September 30,2009, the District paid all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the note. $ Amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 I 1 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 29 of 59 NOTE F - LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS, CONTINUED $527,590 capital lease dated May 18,2009 payable annually, beginning April 7, 2010, to a financial institution in the amount of $66,429 including interest at 4.51 %, collateralized by the respective vehicle. Final payment due April 7, 2019. During the year ended September 30, 2009, the District paid all outstanding principal and accrued interest on the capital lease and received title to the respective vehicle. Early termination benefits. During the year ended September 30, 2009, the District approved an early retirement incentive package to all sworn employees (see Note M). The early retirement benefits are payable over a three (3) year period ending September, 2012. 1,162,987 Non-current portion of compensated absences. Employees of the District are entitled to paid vacation based on length of service and job classification. 1,356,623 $ 2,519,610 Interest expense for the year ended September 30,2009 was $62,975. NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS The following three retirement plans have been established by the District: Plan 1 - Florida Retirement System (FRS) Plan 2 - Firefighter's Pension Trust Fund (Florida Statute 175) Plan 3 - Governmental Money Purchase Plan (Chief) Employee participation in a specific plan is based on the respective employee's original hire date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 30 of 59 NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS, CONTINUED Plan 1 - Plan description and provisions - Florida Retirement System All District personnel employed prior to January 1, 1996 and all other District personnel (other than certified firefighters) including the Board of Commissioners, hired on or after January 1, 1996, are participants in the statewide Florida Retirement System (FRS) under the Authority of Article X, Section 14 of the State Constitution and Florida Statutes, Chapters 112 and 121. The FRS Plan (the "Plan") is noncontributory and is totally administered by the State of Florida. The District contributed 100% of the required contributions for the years ended September 30, 2009,2008, and 2007. The District's covered payroll for the years ended September 30,2009,2008, and 2007 was $5,624,683, $5,612,604, and $5,551,822, respectively. The District's contributions to the Plan were $1,075,003, $1,087,498, and $1,064,613, for the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, which represents 19%, 19%, and 17%, respectively, of covered payroll. Pension costs for the District ranged between 10% to 21 % for the year ended September 30,2009. There were no employee contributions required or made to the Plan. Employees who retire at or after age 62 with 6 years of creditable service, 6 years of senior management service and age 62, 6 years of special risk service and age 55, or 30 years of service (25 for special risk) regardless of age, are entitled to a retirement benefit, payable for life, equal to 1.6% to 3.0% per year of creditable service, depending on the class of employee (regular, special risk, etc.) based on average final compensation of the five (5) highest fiscal years' compensation. Benefits vest after six years (six years for senior management) of creditable service. Vested employees may retire anytime after vesting and incur a 5% benefit reduction for each year prior to normal retirement age. Early retirement, disability, death and survivor benefits are also offered. Benefits are established by State Statute. The Plan provides for a constant 3% cost-of-living adjustment for retirees. The Plan also provides several other Plan and/or investment options that may be elected by the employee. Each offers specific contribution and benefit options. The Plan documents should be referenced for complete detail. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 31 of 59 NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS, CONTINUED Plan 1 - Plan description and provisions - Florida Retirement System. continued Description of funding policy - This is a cost sharing, multi-employer plan available to governmental units within the State. Actuarial information with respect to an individual participating entity is not available. Participating employers are required, by Statute, to pay monthly contributions at actuarially determined rates that, expressed as percentages of annual covered payroll, are adequate to accumulate sufficient assets to pay benefits when due. Trend information - A copy of the FRS's June 30, 2009 annual report can be obtained by writing the Florida Division of Retirement, Cedars Executive Center, 2639-C North Monroe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1560, or by calling (850) 488-5706. Plan 2 - Plan description and provisions - Firefil!:hters' Pension Trust Fund The following brief description of the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District Firefighters' Pension Plan (the "Plan") is provided for general information purposes only. Participants should refer to the plan agreement for a more complete description of the Plan. On July 11, 1996, under the authority of Florida Statute 175 and Laws of Florida, Chapter 95-338, the District's Board of Commissioners passed Resolutions 96-004 and 96-005, providing for the establishment and funding of a single employer defined benefit retirement plan and trust for newly hired fire suppression personnel. The resolutions establish that certified firefighters employed on or after January 1, 1996 are to become participants in the District's Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund. The Plan is totally administered, including all investment management, by a third party administrator and the Plan's appointed Pension Board. During the year ended September 30, 2009, the Plan adopted Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement Number 50 "Pension Disclosures" (GASB 50) which amends GASB Statements Number 25 "Financial Reporting for Defined Benefit Pension Plans and Note Disclosures for Defined Contribution Plans", and Number 27 "Accounting for Pensions by State and Local Government Employers". GASB 50 requires disclosure in the notes to the financial statements of pension plans and certain employer governments of the current funded status of the plan and other actuarial information. The adoptions of GASB 50 had an impact on the presentation of the notes to the financial statements but had no impact on the Plan's net assets available for Plan benefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 32 of 59 NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS, CONTINUED Plan 2 - Plan description and provisions - Firefie:hters' Pension Trust Fund. continued During the years ended September 30,2009,2008, and 2007, there were employee contributions in the amounts of$33,580, $64,224, and $49,645, respectively. These employee contributions were for the buyback of military service time for certain employees. There were no employee contributions to the Plan during the years ended September 30, 2005 or 2004, as the District funds the scheduled employee required contributions. The employer contributed 100% of its required contributions, as well as those required ofthe participating firefighters (0.5% pick-up). The Plan provides for full-time firefighting personnel to become eligible to participate in the Plan immediately upon hire. Under District resolution 96-005, the District elected to pay the 0.5% (1 % prior to December 9,2004) employee required contribution on behalf of the employee. Effective December 9,2004 the employee contribution was reduced to 0.5% (employee pick up). Effective July 1,2001 (per resolution 01-01), benefits under the Plan vest after six years of creditable service. Employees who elect normal retirement at or after age 55 with 6 years of creditable service, or 25 years of service regardless of age, are entitled to a retirement benefit. Employees may elect early retirement after 6 years of creditable service and attainment of age 50 with a reduction in benefit not to exceed 3% for each year before normal retirement. The Plan also includes certain disability and death benefits. Contributions - Contributions to the Plan are derived from three sources: employees (" 1 % pick-up" - 1 % of compensation paid by the District on behalf of the employee pursuant to Resolution 96-005) effective December 9,2004, the required employee contribution was reduced to 0.5% (employee pick up), State funds (fire [hazard] insurance premium tax per Florida Statute Chapter 175) and employer (remaining amount necessary to meet actuarial requirement). For the period from January 1, 1996 through September 30, 1996, no employer contributions were required. Employer contributions were required from October 1, 1996 through September 30, 2009. The State contributions under Chapter 175 began in June 1997. This revenue is based on property fire insurance premiums paid within the District and is applied up to an approved "frozen" limit of$1,747,7l6. The District (employer) is required to fund the difference each year between the total contributions from all other sources for the year and the total cost for the year pursuant to the most recent actuarial valuation of the Plan. The total cost for any year equals total normal cost plus the additional amounts sufficient to amortize the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 j 1 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 33 of 59 NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS, CONTINUED Plan 2 - Plan description and provisions - Firefi2:hters' Pension Trust Fund. continued unfunded past service liability over a 30 year period commencing the first year of the Plan's inception. Pursuant to the actuarial study dated October 1, 2008, the District's fiscal year 2009 contribution (District only) requirement was $1,756,227, which approximated 24.8% of the actuarially determined covered payroll. Actual District contributions to the Plan for the year ended September 30, 2009, were $2,077,653, including $283,580 applied from 2008 prepaid contributions and including $37,846 contributed by the District on behalf of the participating firefighters (employee pick -up)). The State contributions for the year ended September 30, 2009 were $1,039,931. At October 1,2009, $1,277,632 of the Plan's total net assets (state contributions) were restricted for future benefits increases. Pension benefits - Effective July 1, 2001, employees with 6 or more years of service are entitled to monthly pension benefits, beginning at the earlier of age 55 with 6 years of credited service or 25 years credited service regardless of ages, equal to 3.53% of their average final compensation (AFC) over the 5 highest years within the last 10 years of service multiplied by number of years of credited service. Maximum benefit is 100% of AFC. The plan permits early retirement at age 50 with 6 years of credited service. Employees may elect to receive their pension benefits in the form of a 10 year certain and life annuity. If employees terminate before rendering 6 years of credited service, they forfeit the right to receive the portion of their accumulated plan benefits. All retirement benefits are annually increased for cost of living at 3%. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ~I 1 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 34 of 59 NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS, CONTINUED Plan 2 - Plan description and provisions - Firefi2:hters' Pension Trust Fund. continued Death and Disability benefits - Upon the death of any vested member, whether or not still in active employment, a survivor benefit is payable to the beneficiary starting when the member would have reached retirement age. The benefit is equal to the vested pension benefit and is payable for 10 years. A spousal and/or minor benefit is provided for line of duty death is equal to a minimum of one half of the members salary for life ( spouse) or age 18 (child). Employees who become totally disabled with at least 8 years of credited service receive the greater of the accrued pension benefit or 25% of AFC, if non-service incurred, or 42% of AFC, if active service incurred. Effective December 9, 2004, the active service related benefit was increased to 65%. Supplemental Benefits - Effective December 31, 2004, each service and disability retiree and their joint pensioners or beneficiaries and vested terminated members shall receive a supplemental payment to be used as a health insurance subsidy payment. The amount shall be five dollars ($5) for each full year of credited service for life. The maximum monthly supplement is one hundred fifty dollars ($150) and the minimum thirty dollars ($30). Income recognition - Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Investments are reported at market value. Short-term investments are reported at cost, which approximates market value. Actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits - Accumulated plan benefits are those future periodic payments, including lump-sum distributions, that are attributable under the Plan's provisions to the service employees have rendered. Accumulated plan benefits include benefits expected to be paid to (a) retired or terminated employees or their beneficiaries, (b) beneficiaries of employees who have died, and (c) present employees or their beneficiaries. Benefits under the Plan are based on employees' age at entry to the Plan and are based upon the current starting salary for firefighters at entry level. Benefits payable under all circumstances, retirement, death, disability and termination of employment, are included, to the extent they are deemed attributable to employee service rendered to the valuation date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16~'1 lA 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 35 of 59 NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS, CONTINUED Plan 2 - Plan description and provisions - Firefie:hters' Pension Trust Fund. continued The actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits is determined by an actuary and is the amount that results from applying actuarial assumptions to adjust the accumulated plan benefits to reflect the time value of money (through discounts for interest) and the probability of payment (by means of decrements such as for death, disability, withdrawal, or retirement) between the valuation date and the expected date of payment. The significant actuarial assumptions used in the valuations as of October 1,2007 were (a) life expectancy of participants - RP 2000 (combined healthy, sex distinct) Mortality Table was used, (b) retirement age assumptions (the assumed average retirement age was 55), and (c) annual investment return of 8%. The October 1, 2008 actuarial valuation reflected assumed average rates of return of 8%. The foregoing actuarial assumptions are based on the presumption that the Plan will continue. If the Plan terminated, different actuarial assumptions and other factors might be applicable in determining the actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits. Payment of benefits - Benefit payments to participants are recorded upon distribution. The District contributed 100% of the required contributions. A summary of certain Plan details and trend information is included below. A copy of the Plan and Plan audit for September 30, 2009 can be obtained by writing the District at 1885 Veterans Park Drive, Naples, Florida 34109-0492, or by calling (239) 597-3222. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 36 of 59 NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS, CONTINUED Year established and governing authority Governing body Plan 2 - Plan description and provisions - Firefie:hters' Pension Trust Fund. continued The following is a summary of the Single Employer-Defined Benefits Plan, including funding policies, contribution methods, benefit provisions and trend information: Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund - Plan 2 District Resolution 96- 004 (July 11, 1996) Board of Trustees of Plan Determination of contribution requirements: Employer (District) Plan members Actuarially determined Amount required in excess of Member and applicable State contributions needed in order to pay current costs and amortize any unfunded past service cost over 30 years 0.5% of Covered payroll- Note: The District adopted Resolution 96-005 to fund the contribution for the employees. (Pick-up) Funding of administrative costs Period required to vest Annual salary increase Post retirement benefit Increase Employer 6 years 6% Cost of living increase of of3% each year Eligibility for distribution (Normal retirement) Earlier of 55 with 6 years of credited service or 25 years credited service regardless of age Provisions for: Disability benefits Death benefits Early retirement Yes Yes Yes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 Al NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Septem ber 30, 2009 Page 37 of 59 NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS, CONTINUED Plan 2 - Plan description and provisions - Firefil!hters' Pension Trust Fund. continued Memberships of the Plan consisted of the following at October 1,2008: Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund - Plan 2 Active plan participants Vested Non-vested 60 42 Retirees and beneficiaries receiving benefits o Terminated Plan members entitled to but not yet receiving benefits ~ Total 104 Number of participating employers Number of participating state agencies Annual Pension Cost. Net Pension Oblil!ation and Reserves Current year annual pension costs for the Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund are shown in the trend information provided. The Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund had a net unfunded actuarial accrued liability at October 1,2008 of$170,727. The Plan assets are legally reserved for the payment of the respective plan member benefits within the Plan. There are no assets legally restricted for plan benefits other than these assets within the Plan. The Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund held certain investments at year end. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ~ 1 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 38 of 59 NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS, CONTINUED Plan 2 - Plan description and provisions - Firefie:hters' Pension Trust Fund. continued Trend Information Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund Total (2) Required Net Annual State (3) (I) Pension Fiscal Pension District State Frozen Actual Percentage Obligation Year Contribution Contribution Contribution Contribution Contribution Contributed (NPO) 2009 $ 2,796,158 $ 2,039,807 $ 1,039,931 $1,039,931 $ 3,079,738 110% 2008 $ 2,211,933 $ 1,009,715 $ 1,485,798 $1,485,798 $ 2,495,513 113% 2007 $ 2,132,248 $ 2,019,430 $ 1,390,449 $ 112,818 $ 2,132,248 100% 2006 $ 1,178,959 $ 1,066,141 $ 733,516 $ 112,818 $ 1,178,959 100% 2005 $ 1,000,009 $ 887,191 $ 608,709 $ 112,818 $ 1,000,009 100% 2004 $ 792,577 $ 679,759 $ 527,004 $ 112,818 $ 792,577 100% (1) Excludes employee 1 % and 0.5%, as applicable, pick-up but includes employer and State frozen contributions. (2) The District considers its annual pension cost to be its actuarially determined required annual pension contribution including the employer and state contribution. (3) The Plan's frozen limit for 2009 and 2008 was $1,747,716. Pension Trust ReCluired Supplementarv Information Schedule of Funding Progress Firefighters' Pension Plan: Unfunded Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial UAAL as a Value of Accrued Accrued Annual Percentage of Actuarial Assets Liability (AAL) Liability Funded Covered Covered Valuation (AVA) -Entry Age (VAAL ) Ratio Payroll Payroll Date (a) (b) (b-a) (a/b) (c) (b-a)/c 10/01/09 $17,833,111 $18,108,267 $ 275,156 98.5% $ 7,522,834 3.7% 1 % 1/08 $16,719,426 $16,890,153 $ 170,727 99.0% $ 7,082,194 2.4% 10/0 1 /07 $12,904,948 $12,884,785 $ (20,163) 100.2% $ 7,276,954 -0.3% 10/01/06 $ 8,572,161 $ 9,025,001 $ 452,840 95.0% $ 5,960,908 7.6% 1 % 1/05 $ 6,322,176 $ 6,783,798 $ 461,622 93.2% $ 3,815,952 12.1% 10/01/04 $ 4,063,514 $ 4,991,512 $ 927,998 81.4% $ 3,300,680 28.1% 10/01/03 $ 2,420,236 $ 3,338,115 $ 917,879 72.5% $ 2,633,944 34.8% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11:1 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 39 of 59 NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS, CONTINUED Plan 2 - Plan description and provisions - Firefie:hters' Pension Trust Fund. continued Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund 10/01/09 Valuation date Actuarial cost method Amortization method Remaining amortization period Actuarial asset valuation method Actuarial assumptions: Investment rate Projected salary increase* *Includes inflation at Post retirement cost of living adjustment Frozen Entry Age Level dollar, closed 28 years (as of 10/1/09) Market 8% 6% 3% 3% Plan 3 - Governmental Monev Purchase Plan During the year ended September 30, 2007, the District approved a Governmental Money Purchase Plan (401 (a)), a defined contribution plan which is available only to the District's now former Fire Chief. The Plan is completely administered by the Plan custodian. The Plan required the District to make monthly contributions of a percentage of the former Chiefs eligible compensation equal to the average of the rate for the special risk category of the FRS and the contribution rate for the District's Chapter 175 Firefighters' Pension Trust. In addition, as part of the former Chiefs employment agreement, an amount equal to the proportionate share of the annual premium designated for his medical benefits are to be placed in the 401(a) plan in lieu of participation in the District's medical plan. Any amounts in excess of the maximum allowable contributions to a 40l(a) plan are placed in the former Chiefs 457 Deferred Compensation Plan. The contribution limits for calendar years 2009, 2008, and 2007, were $49,000, $46,000, and $45,000, respectively. On October 12, 2006, the Board adopted Resolution 06-045 which established the plan and required retroactive contributions to the date of employment of the Fire Chief (June 13, 2006). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 ,I NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT Page 40 of 59 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 NOTE G - RETIREMENT PLANS, CONTINUED Plan 3 - Governmental Monev Purchase Plan. continued The contribution rate for the year ended September 30,2007 was 26.91 % and the contributions totaled $56,056, including the medical premium benefit. The contribution rate for the year ended September 30,2008 was 26.91 % and the contributions totaled $56,996, including the medical premium benefit. The contribution rate for the year ended September 30, 2009 was 26.91 % and the contributions totaled $47,616, including the medical premium benefit. During the year ended September 30, 2009, the Chief elected to early retire. As such, the now former Chief, as part of the District's early retirement incentive package, agreed to retire and is entitled to the benefits described in Note M of the financial statements. NOTE H - POST -EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSION BENEFITS The District provides insurance (health, life and dental) benefits to its retired employees. All retired full-time employees are eligible for benefits if actively employed by the District immediately before retirement. As of September 30, 2009, there were fifteen (15) retirees receiving these benefits. The benefits are provided both with and without contractual or labor agreements. The benefits may require contribution from the retirees, depending on certain specified criteria and, in particular, length of creditable employment. The District, also, pays up to 50% of retiree dependent coverage. The District finances the benefits on a pay-as-you-go basis and recognizes expenditures at the time premiums are due. The net cost to the District for these benefits totaled $97,052 during the year ended September 30, 2009. NOTE I - RISK MANAGEMENT The District began participating in a self-insurance program for health and dental insurance claims beginning January 1, 2005 and continued to do so through December 31, 2008. The self-insurance program had stated annual individual stop loss limits ($60,000 per individual employee for calendar 2005, $70,000 for calendar 2006, $80,000 for calendar years 2007 and 2008) and aggregate loss limits (approximately $1.8 million for calendar 2006, $2.2 million for calendar 2007, and $2,667,000 for calendar 2008, but varied with number of covered employees) and retained third party excess coverage (reinsurance) for claims in excess of the loss limits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 I lA 1. ; NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30,2009 Page 41 of 59 NOTE I - RISK MANAGEMENT, CONTINUED Beginning January 1,2009, the District converted to a fully funded third party insured health plan; however, dental remains a self-insurance plan. Maximum benefit per participant is $1,500 per year, which includes employees, spouses, and family. Maximum dental benefits payable for calendar 2009, is approximately $789,000, but varies with the number of covered participants. Vision insurance was added to the benefits offered and is not a self-insurance plan. In addition, the District added a policy for reimbursement of the cost of certain over-the-counter medications in lieu of prescriptions. There is no stated maximum amount that will be reimbursed for prescriptions. The District incurred $2,879,676 in claims, third party administration costs, premiums and reinsurance premiums during the fiscal year ending September 30,2009, for the self-insurance and fully-funded insurance programs. No accrual has been made as of September 30, 2009, for estimates of amounts to be paid for actual and incurred claims but not reported (IBNR) claims prior to January 1, 2009 as it is not possible to determine claims incurred and not reported. It is the policy of the District to purchase third party commercial insurance for other remaining forms of potential risks to which it is exposed. The District's risk management activities are reported in the General Fund. No accrual has been recorded for claims and incidents not reported to the insurer. The District had no significant reductions in insurance coverage from the prior year. Reported claims have not exceeded the insurance coverage for the years ended September 30, 1998 through September 30,2009. The District's total liability within anyone year is limited to the annual loss limit, except for tail coverage estimated at approximately three (3) months' average claims in the year of plan termination. The District has no plan to terminate coverage. NOTE J - PROPERTY TAXES Property taxes are levied after formal adoption ofthe District's budget and become due and payable on November 1 of each year and are delinquent on April 1 of the following year. Discounts on property taxes are allowed for payments made prior to the April 1 delinquent date. Tax certificates are sold to the public for the full amount of any unpaid taxes and must be sold not later than June 1 of each year. The billing, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1611A'i NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 42 of 59 NOTE J - PROPERTY TAXES, CONTINUED collection, and related record keeping of all property taxes is performed for the District by the Collier County Tax Collector. No accrual for the property tax levy becoming due in November 2009 is included in the accompanying basic financial statements, since such taxes are collected to finance expenditures of the subsequent period. Procedures for collecting delinquent taxes, including applicable tax certificate sales and tax deed sales, are provided for by Florida Statutes. The enforceable lien date is approximately two years after taxes become delinquent and occurs only upon request ofa holder ofa delinquent tax certificate. As of September 30,2009, $247,246 was due from the Collier County Tax Collector to the District for ad valorem taxes and excess fees, and interest. Important dates in the property tax cycle are as follows: Assessment roll certified Millage resolution approved July 1 No later than 93 days following certification of assessment roll. November/with various discount provisions through March 31. Taxes due and payable (Levy date) Property taxes payable - maximum discount (4 percent) Beginning of fiscal year for which taxes have been levied 30 days after levy date October 1 Due date March 31 April 1 Taxes become delinquent (lien date) Tax certificates sold by the Collier County Tax Collector Prior to June 1 For the year ended September 30,2009, the Board of Commissioners of the District levied ad valorem taxes at a millage rate of$0.9869 per $1,000 (0.9869 mill) of the 2008 net taxable value of real property located within the District. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 II A 1 ~ NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT Page 43 of 59 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 NOTE K - DESIGNATED AND/OR RESERVED FUND BALANCEINET ASSETS Fund BalancelNet Assets were designated and/or reserved for the following purposes at September 30, 2009: Designated fund balance General Fund - Maintaining level of service General Fund - Replacement Radios/Communications General Fund - Health insurance General Fund - GASB 45 Post Employment Benefits General Fund - Emergency reserve General Fund - Operating reserve General Fund - Capital fIre apparatus General Fund - Building improvements General Fund - Vehicle replacement General Fund - SCBA replacement General Fund - Capital equipment General Fund - Station #46 improvements General Fund - Personal Protective Gear Total General Fund Amount $ 5,413,929 300,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,400,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 100,000 160,000 1,501,000 20,900 100,000 $ 14,795,829 Reserved Net Assets Firefighters' Pension Fund-frrefighters' retirement benefits Total Reserved Net Assets Amount $ 17,833,061 $ 17,833,061 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 It Al . NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 44 of 59 NOTE L - IMPACT FEE FUND ACTIVITY During the year ended September 30,2009, the Impact Fee Fund had the following activity: Amount Deferred revenue, October 1, 2008 Impact fee receipts (1) Interest income Other income Refunds Operating fees - collection fees Capital outlay Prior Year Deficit Fund Balance Deferred revenue, September 30, 2009 $ 532,907 3,506 (31,891 ) (7,984) $ (306.127) 190,411 (1) Including Impact fee receipts due from other governments of $65,904. During the year ended September 30,2009, the District had Impact Fee receipts in the amount of$532,907 and recognized (earned) impact fees of $342,496 which cleared the prior year deficit fund balance. NOTE M - TERMINATION BENEFITS During the year ended September 30,2009, the District offered an Early Retirement Incentive Package to all sworn employees to reduce the long term operating expenses of the District. Eligible employees were allowed to make a one time irrevocable decision to accept the Early Retirement Incentive Package. The effective date, as selected by each employee, must be no later than ninety (90) days after the employee's anniversary date occurring between October 1, 2008 and September 30, 2009 but under no circumstances may the effective date be later than September 30, 2009. The Package offered one (1) year's base salary and professional pay incentives, and payout of the balance of accrued unused sick, vacation, and holiday pay where applicable. The Early Retirement Incentive Package also allowed for the use of any unused personal and/or Column D time, provided the use of such time is completed prior to the commencement of the Early Retirement Incentive option, no later than ninety days after the employee's anniversary date, or no later than September 30, 2009, whichever is earliest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1. NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 45 of 59 NOTE M - TERMINATION BENEFITS, CONTINUED Additionally, each eligible employee that chose the Early Retirement Incentive option would receive the same health, vision and dental insurance as bargaining unit employees for employee, spouse, and their dependents, paid one hundred percent (100%) by the District for three (3) years from the beginning of the each employee's Early Retirement Incentive Package effective date. The District would also continue to provide life insurance for the employee for twelve (12) months immediately following the employee's Early Retirement Incentive Package effective date. Each eligible employee selecting the Early Retirement Incentive option could choose to receive the payout of the base salary and professional incentives in one (1) or two (2) lump sum payments, or to receive the amount incrementally over twenty four (24) pay periods. If the incremental payout was selected, the payment of the balance of accrued, unused sick, vacation, and holiday pay would be paid on the twenty fourth (24th) incremental payment. If the lump sum payment option was chosen, the payment of the balance of the accrued, unused sick, vacation, and holiday pay was paid on dates selected by each employee between their Early Retirement Incentive option effective date and September 30, 2009. Employees selecting the incremental payout was also credited one (1) year of service to be included in the calculation of the retiree health insurance benefit pursuant to District Policy Section 14.05. Thirteen (13) District employees elected to accept the Early Retirement Incentive Package. Two (2) of the thirteen (13) employees chose a single lump sum payment, two (2) chose two(2) lump sum payments, and the remaining eleven (11) chose to be paid incrementally over twenty four (24) pay periods (twelve (12) months). The total cost of the termination benefits is estimated to be $2,157,471 consisting of $994,484 paid during the year ended September 30, 2009, $918,547 included in the government-wide statements as the current portion oflong term debt, and $244,440 included in non-current portion of long term debt. Final payment of benefits relating to the Early Retirement Incentive Package will occur during September, 2012. The estimated cost for fiscal years 2010, 2011, and 2012 is based on current rates for health insurance coverages and does not include any rate projected increases as any increase can not be readily estimated. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 Al NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2009 Page 46 of 59 NOTE M - TERMINATION BENEFITS, CONTINUED The estimated cost for the thirteen (13) participants that elected to accept the early retirement incentive package over the next three years is as follows: Year Ending 9/30/2010 9/30/2011 9/30/2012 Estimated Cost $918,547 167,843 76,597 NOTE 0 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The District is involved from time to time in certain routine litigation, the substance of which either as liabilities or recoveries, would not materially affect the financial position of the District. Although the final outcome of the lawsuits, assertions, and claims or the exact amount of costs and/or potential recovery is not presently determinable, in the opinion of the District's legal counsel, the resolution of these matters will not have a materially adverse affect on the financial condition of the District. As a general policy, the District plans to vigorously contest any such matters. NOTE P - IMPLEMENTATION OF RECENTLY RELEASED GASB STATEMENTS The Governmental Accounting Standards Board has issued Statement No. 45, "Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Post-Employment Benefits Other Than Pensions" (GASB 45). This Statement will change the manner in which a governmental entity discloses, accrues, and funds its post retirement benefits other than pensions. Upon implementation of this statement, the District will be required to actuarially determine the cost of its post retirement benefits other than pensions and fund those costs annually. This Statement may have a significant effect on the District's annual budget. The Statement is effective for the year ended September 30, 2010. The District intends to implement this Statement at that time and has designated fund balance in the General Fund in the amount of $500,000 to begin funding of this liability. The District contracted an actuary to perform this analysis. The actuary has released and initial estimate of the District's required annual contribution which fanged between $195,000 and $304,000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 '1 A,l REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION OTHER THAN MD&A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 , 1 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - GENERAL FUND - SUMMARY STATEMENT Year Ended September 30, 2009 Page 47 of 59 General Fund Variance Original Final Favorable Budget Budget Actual (Unfavorable ) REVENUES Ad Valorem taxes $ 26,103,691 $ 26,663,348 $ 26,670,789 $ 7,441 Intergovernmental revenue 67,841 67,841 Charges for services 138,625 138,625 119,720 (18,905) Miscellaneous: Interest 492,000 492,000 600,040 108,040 Other 289,470 289,470 230,114 (59,356) Subtotal - revenues 27,023,786 27,583,443 27,688,504 105,061 Cash brought forward 11,206,075 13,953,594 (13,953,594) TOTAL REVENUES 38,229,861 41,537,037 27,688,504 (13,848,533) EXPENDITURES Current Public safety Personal services 22,078,248 21,590,657 21,379,100 211,557 Operating expenditures 4,037,116 3,859,382 3,198,514 660,868 Capital outlay 1,149,730 1,651,843 1,509,669 142,174 Debt service Principal reduction 53,389 1,241,479 1,246,190 (4,711) Interest and fiscal charges 25, I 14 35,114 62,975 (27,861) Reserves 10,886,264 13,706,152 13,706,152 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 38,229,861 42,084,627 27,396,448 14,688, I 79 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (547,590) 292,056 839,646 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Proceeds from disposition of capital assets 20,000 22,589 2,589 Proceeds from capital lease 527,590 527,590 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 547,590 550,179 2,589 EXCESS OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER EXPENDITURES $ - $ 842,235 $ 842,235 FUND BALANCE - Beginning 13,953,594 FUND BALANCE - Ending $ 14,795,829 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1611A.l NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL FUND - DETAILED STATEMENT Year Ended September 30,2009 Page 48 of 59 General Fund Variance Original Final Favorable Budget Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES Ad Valorem taxes $ 26,103,691 $ 26,663,348 $ 26,670,789 $ 7,441 Intergovernmental revenue 67,841 67,841 Charges for services 138,625 138,625 119,720 (18,905) Miscellaneous: Interest 492,000 492,000 600,040 108,040 Other 289,470 289,470 230,114 (59,356) Subtotal - revenues 27,023,786 27,583,443 27,688,504 105,061 Cash brought forward 11,206,075 13,953,594 (13,953,594) TOTAL REVENUES 38,229,861 41,537,037 27,688,504 ( 13,848,533) EXPENDITURES Current Public safety Personal services: Salaries Firefighters & Admin. 12,155,279 12,155,279 12,361,445 (206,166) Commissioners 30,000 30,000 30,000 Overtime 577,281 577,281 446,507 130,774 Incentives and holiday pay 550,207 550,207 559,027 (8,820) Payroll taxes Social Security 1,055,246 1,055,246 1,019,520 35,726 Benefits Retirement 2,885,289 2,885,289 2,916,692 (31,403) Health insurance 2,950,000 2,843,000 2,926,039 (83,039) Disability insurance 169,032 69,032 64,712 4,320 Vacation 129,417 68,000 65,902 2,098 Sick leave 460,598 460,598 447,949 12,649 Unemployment insurance 37,464 37,464 22,749 14,715 Workers compensation 966,435 747,261 477,635 269,626 Employee physicals 110,000 110,000 35,086 74,914 Retirement recognition 2,000 2,000 5,837 (3,837) Subtotal - Personal services 22,078,248 21,590,657 21,379,100 211,557 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1611 Al NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL FUND - DETAILED STATEMENT (CONTINUED) Year Ended September 30, 2009 Page 49 of 50 General Fund Variance Original Final Favorable Operating expenditures: Budget Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Insurance 343,549 343,549 247,746 95,803 Unifonns 63,450 63,450 48,788 14,662 Communications 34,000 34,000 28,629 5,371 Telephone 200,000 200,000 163,394 36,606 Utilities 190,100 190,100 198,217 (8,117) Maintenance Vehicle 320,800 320,800 304,205 16,595 Equipment 43,060 43,060 51,542 (8,482) Computer 166,734 80,000 57,570 22,430 Hydrant 70,600 70,600 52,583 18,017 Building 343,070 343,070 337,721 5,349 Supplies Office 43,660 43,660 29,402 14,258 Protective gear 26,500 26,500 29,524 (3,024) Station 27,900 27,900 32,270 (4,370) Emergency medical 92,267 92,267 88,906 3,361 Hurricane/emergency 10,000 10,000 10,000 Equipment Office 44,857 44,857 45,792 (935) Fire 92,000 92,000 53,348 38,652 Shop 4,150 4,150 10,274 (6,124) Warehouse/Logistics 2,000 2,000 1,906 94 Professional and other fees Legal and professional 316,000 225,000 227,930 (2,930) Property appraiser fees 209,048 209,048 178,748 30,300 Tax collector fees 525,074 525,074 530,309 (5,235) Accounting 85,000 85,000 69,290 15,710 Miscellaneous Travel 68,170 68,170 21,456 46,714 Water/sewer fee S1. 44 5,000 5,000 4,602 398 Public infonnation officer 3,675 3,675 832 2,843 Public education officer 27,900 27,900 19,472 8,428 Fuel and oil 350,000 350,000 166,904 183,096 Legal advertisements 9,900 9,900 5,974 3,926 Dues and subscriptions 8,873 8,873 11,563 (2,690) CERT team 13,210 13,210 3,485 9,725 Dive team 5,450 5,450 8,128 (2,678) Fire prevention 17,444 17,444 10,557 6,887 Training 167,000 167,000 122,633 44,367 Hazardous materials 7,000 7,000 12,345 (5,345) Technical rescue 7,475 7,475 7,835 (360) Boat team 6,000 6,000 5,300 700 K -9 search and rescue 1,500 1,500 1,500 Honor guard 2,700 2,700 (128) 2,828 PETe 1,000 1,000 1,000 Peer fitness 1,000 1,000 1,000 Miscellaneous 30,000 30,000 9,462 20,538 Operational Reserves Contingency 50,000 50,000 _ 50,000 Subtotal - Operating expenditures 4,037,116 3,859,382 3,198,514 660,868 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL FUND - DETAILED STATEMENT (CONTINUED) Year Ended September 30, 2009 Page 50 of 59 General Fund Variance Original Final Favorable Capital outlay: Budget Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Land 454,523 454,523 Station improvements 413,700 413,700 345,624 68,076 Fire & rescue equipment 73,000 73,000 76,962 (3,962) Protective gear 20,000 20,000 22,240 (2,240) Communication equipment 12,000 12,000 12,000 Office equipment 30,000 30,000 14,709 15,291 Computers 65,305 65,305 29,795 35,510 Technical rescue equipment 5,525 5,525 2,829 2,696 Boat team 6,000 6,000 12,940 (6,940) Training equipment 16,000 16,000 12,270 3,730 Shop equipment 3,700 3,700 3,700 Logistics/warehouse 5,000 5,000 4,950 50 Hazardous materials equip. 8,000 8,000 8,000 F ire apparatus 480,000 527,590 527,590 Dive equipment 6,000 6,000 6,000 F ire prevention 5,500 5,500 5,237 263 Subtotal - Capital outlay 1,149,730 1,651,843 1,509,669 142,174 Debt service: Principal reduction 53,389 1,241,479 1,246,190 (4,711) Interest and fiscal charges 25,114 35,114 62,975 (27,861) Subtotal - Debt service 78,503 1,276,593 1,309,165 (32,572) Reserves: Designated reserves 10,886,264 13,706,152 13,706,152 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 38,229,861 42,084,627 27,396,448 14,688,179 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (547,590) 292,056 839,646 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Proceeds from disposition of capital assets 20,000 22,589 2,589 Proceeds from capital lease 527,590 527,590 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 547,590 550,179 2,589 EXCESS OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER EXPENDITURES $ - $ 842,235 $ 842,235 FUND BALANCE - Beginning 13,953,594 FUND BALANCE - Ending $ 14,795,829 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A ~ NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - IMPACT FEE FUND - SUMMARY STATEMENT Year Ended September 30, 2009 Page 51 of 59 Impact Fee Fund Variance Original Final Favorable Budget Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES Fees: Impact fees $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 342,496 S (857,504) Miscellaneous: Proceeds from Sale of Land Interest 20,000 20,000 3,506 (16,494) Other Subtotal - revenues 1,220,000 1,220,000 346,002 (873,998) Cash brought forward (2,000) (2,000) 2,000 TOTAL REVENUES 1,218,000 1,218,000 346,002 (871,998) EXPENDITURES Current Public safety Operating expenditures 18,000 18,000 39,875 (21,875) Capital outlay 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Reserves TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,218,000 1,218,000 39,875 1,178,125 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES $ - $ 306,127 $ 306,127 FUND BALANCE - Beginning (306,127) FUND BALANCE - Ending $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 , lA 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT Page 52 of 59 ST A TEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL IMP ACT FEE FUND - DETAILED STATEMENT Year Ended September 30, 2009 Impact Fee Fund Variance Original Final Favorable Budget Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES Fees: Impact fees $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 342,496 $ (857,504) Miscellaneous: Proceeds from sale ofland Interest 20,000 20,000 3,506 (16,494 ) Other Subtotal - revenues 1,220,000 1,220,000 346,002 (873,998) Cash brought forward (2,000) (2,000) 2,000 TOTAL REVENUES 1,218,000 1,218,000 346,002 (871,998) EXPENDITURES Miscellaneous Refunds 31,891 (31,891) Impact fee collection 18,000 18,000 7,984 10,016 Subtotal - Operating expenditures 18,000 18,000 39,875 (21,875) Capital outlay: Emergency traffic device - St. 42 Station 48 engineering 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Station 49 engineering Subtotal - Capital outlay 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Reserves: TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,218,000 1,218,000 39,875 1,178,125 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES $ - $ 306,127 $ 306,127 FUND BALANCE - Beginning (306,127) FUND BALANCE - Ending $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1611A}. NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - INSPECTION FEE FUND - SUMMARY STATEMENT Year Ended September 30, 2009 Page 53 of 59 Inspection Fee Fund Variance Original Final Favorable Budget Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES Charges for services $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 461,231 $ (238,769) Miscellaneous: Interest 3,000 3,000 2,021 (979) Subtotal - revenues 703,000 703,000 463,252 (239,748) Cash brought forward 7,051 7,051 (7,051) TOTAL REVENUES 710,051 710,051 463,252 (246,799) EXPENDITURES Current Public safety Personal services 687,370 687,370 295,845 391,525 Operating expenditures Capital outlay Reserves 22,681 22,681 22,681 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 710,051 710,051 295,845 414,206 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES $ - $ 167,407 $ 167,407 FUND BALANCE - Beginning (20,038) FUND BALANCE - Ending $ 147,369 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11A }. NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT ST A TEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL INSPECTION FEE FUND - DETAILED STATEMENT Year Ended September 30, 2009 Page 54 of 59 Inspection Fee Fund Variance Original Final Favorable Budget Budget Actual (Unfavorable ) REVENUES Fees: Inspection fees $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 461,231 $ (238,769) Miscellaneous: Interest 3,000 3,000 2,021 (979) Subtotal - revenues 703,000 703,000 463,252 (239,748) Cash brought forward 7,051 7,051 (7,051) TOTAL REVENUES 710,051 710,051 463,252 (246,799) EXPENDITURES Current Public safety Personal services: Salaries Regular 612,853 612,853 266,664 346,189 Overtime ProfessionallIncentives and holiday pay 4,800 4,800 9,000 (4,200) Payroll taxes Social Security 50,391 50,391 20,181 30,210 Benefits Retirement Health insurance Disability insurance Vacation Sick leave 19,326 19,326 19,326 Unemployment compensation Workers compensation Subtotal - Personal services 687,370 687,370 295,845 391,525 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 11 A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT Page 55 of 59 STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - INSPECTION FEE FUND - DETAILED STATEMENT (CONTINUED) Year Ended September 30, 2009 Inspection Fee Fund Variance Original Final Favorable Operating expenditures: Budget Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Uniforms Telephone Utilities Maintenance Contract labor Hydrant Supplies Office Miscellaneous Employee physicals Dues & subscriptions Fire prevention Training Miscellaneous Subtotal - Operating expenditures Capital outlay: Office facility Vehicles Subtotal - Capital outlay Debt service: Principal reduction Interest and fiscal charges Subtotal - Debt service Reserves: 22,681 22,681 22,681 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 710,051 710,051 295,845 414,206 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES $ - $ 167,407 $ 167,407 FUND BALANCE - Beginning (20,038) FUND BALANCE - Ending $ 147,369 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 , lA 1 . ADDITIONAL REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T TUSCAN 16 I 1 ~.l'''<I'''' of C,rt'nod Publl':~~:~:: .\merkan Institute of Certified Public Accountants & Company, P A Pri,ate Companj~s Practice Section Tax Division Certified Public Accountants & Consultants Page 56 of 59 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS Board of Commissioners North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District 1885 Veterans Park Drive Naples, Florida 34109-0492 We have audited the basic financial statements of North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District as of and for the year ended September 30, 2009 and have issued our report thereon dated March 31,2010. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District's internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our audit procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the basic financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District's internal control over financial reporting. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. INTEGRITy......... SER.VICE EXPEEIEr\CE 12621 World Plaza Lane, Building 55 · Fort Myers. FL 33907 . Phnne: (239) 333-2090 · Fax: (239) 333-2097 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 , 1 A 1 Page 57 of 59 A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the basic financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis. Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be deficiencies, significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District's basic financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of basic financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Commissioners, management, the Auditor General of the State of Florida, and other federal and state audit agencies. This report is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. ~ f Lf-y' '?Il. TUSCAN & COMPANY, P.A. Fort Myers, Florida March 31,2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T 16 11 A 1 Affiliations TUSCAN Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants American Institute of Certified Public Accountants & Company, PA Private Companies Practice Section Tax Division Certified, Public Accountants & Consultants Page 58 of 59 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT TO MANAGEMENT Board of Commissioners North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District 1885 Veterans Park Drive Naples, Florida 34109-0492 We have audited the basic financial statements of North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District (the "District") as of and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 and have issued our report thereon dated March 31, 2010. In connection with our audit, we are submitting the following comments and recommendations in accordance with Chapter 10.550 "Rules of the Auditor General - Local Governmental Entity Audits" (Revised September 30, 2009) Rule 10.557(3) and Section 218.39(4), of the Florida Statutes. PRIOR YEAR COMMENTS THAT CONTINUE TO APPLY: No financially significant prior year comments were noted. CURRENT YEAR COMMENTS: No financially significant comments noted. We have included in this letter all comments which came to our attention during the course of our audit regarding items 1 through 7, as applicable, of the "Rules of the Auditor General-Local Governmental Entity Audits," Rule 10.554, Section (1 )(i). In regard to Item 2, we represent that the District has complied with Florida Statute 218.415 regarding the investment of public funds. In regard to item 7(a), nothing came to our attention to cause us to believe that at any time during the year the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District met any of the criteria for being in a state of financial emergency as defined in Florida Statute 218.503(1). In regard to item 7(c)(1), we applied financial condition assessment procedures pursuant to Rule 10.556(7) and noted no significant indications of deteriorating financial conditions. As such, we do not believe the District to be in a state of financial emergency as a consequence of conditions described in Section INTEGRITy......... SER\'ICE . "".. E.XPERIE::\CE 12621 World Plaza Lane. Building 55 · Fort Myers. FL 33907. Phone: (239) 333-2090. Fax: (239) 333-2097 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1611 A 1 Page 59 of 59 218.503(1) of the Florida Statutes. In regard to Item 7(b), we represent that the financial report filed with the Department of Financial Services, pursuant to Florida Statute 2l8.32(1)(a), is in agreement with the annual financial audit report for the same period. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Commissioners, management, the Auditor General of the State of Florida and other federal and state audit agencies. This report is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. ~~ ~fCJ/~p,4 TUSCAN & COMPANY, P.A. Fort Myers, Florida March 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 J 1 A 1 EXHIBIT 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1611A1 " J. Christopher Lombardo, Chairman Margaret Hanson, Vice Chairman Paul J. Moriarty, Sr. Treasurer James Burke, Commissioner John O. McGowan, Commissioner 1885 Veterans Park Drive Naples, FL 34109 (239) 597-3222 Fax (239) 597-7082 North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District April 8, 2010 Auditor General's Office Local Government Audits/342 Claude Pepper Building, Room 401 111 West Madison Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-1450 We are pleased to note that the audit report for the fiscal year 2008/2009 reflected no current year or prior comments which require management's response. The Board of Fire Commissioners and management staffofthe North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District have worked diligently to resolve past audit comments and address deficiencies in internal controls, and policy and procedures to insure the financial stability of the District. The audit report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 reflects the commitment of the Board and staff to successfully resolve prior year issues. Sincerely, NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT ~~fo7JJ ~~~~~ REBECAH BRONSDON Assistant Chief of Administrative Services 1611 1A 1 NORTH NAPLES FIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ;\ LEE :OLlN7' 50"- T':'" 8=.':"':H P:,.:..: '..... t: -~.," ~ ") '> 1i c , ' '1.-'-... ". ~ )' co o \~ <~,::JiL "-'.>-- eel. l ol.P;. :. Fi SSE ---.~ ::-' ~ ~ '" UJ LEE courny COLctER COUNTY ~ " " '" ill ~ NAPLES-IMMOMLEE POAC ';! ~ ~ -,.. " ,-:.VA.Nl?_E~.~I_ -: JBEACI-! ROA[. "A.NDERB,~ -:- BEAC..... RJA( --------'----~-,,--""""''''---== ~---==--=--= ==-'~- t c ~ ! ~ '> i~ ::;C..CE:-. ':;...~E 80"LEJ.:..QC " ~ " '" '2 ;{ -- " < ~ ::c 's ~I ~ " Ie ~ PI\iE R:OGE R8t.,[ PINE RI:lGE ROAC , .__ ':::::-=----____ __ _,-=-=---,,__~_J.___~-,,_,-_ a. ~ :,0.- - -- ; - / - ~ ~ ~ c ~i >0' z' <' "-~ -! w,,' "' I - NAPLES" .' \ 0 I AIRPQR7 \' 0: \. 8! /~ ~, ~ \'\'''1ITE BO..h_Ev':"P: ~' ," ~: i" ~: ;0 " " :t z ~ :; ;;: " w '" " ~ :> 2 GREEI'. B::,-'~E\JARC " '" " W '" ", W' ~-=-'~- " I , ~v--l_~.. . ~ GOL8EJ\ G~;rE PARKW,c.y i , I ;0 z ;; INTERSTATE 75 RADIO ROA~ DAVIS BOULEvAR: ;r- " ,/' ,~/ ,r-- i 1 M: 2Mi 3M (.) SCALE � l 1b 1 1 i _ _ SPECIAL DISTRICT REPORTING Section 189.416, Florida Statutes, requires that each special district in the state designate a registered office and a registered agent and file this information with the Department of Community Affairs and the local governing authority, Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Any changes in registered agent and registered office must be reported to the above named agencies. In the space below, please provide the correct name and address of your current registered agent: DISTRICT NAME: North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District REGISTERED AGENT: Fire Chief &{ty, REGISTERED OFFICE: 1885 Veterans Park Drive Naples FL 34109 In addition, please provide the telephone number of your registered agent: PHONE NUMBER: (23.9) 597-3222 Indicate your district's status (dependent or independent) by marking and X in the appropriate space. (See section 189.403, Florida Statutes, for definitions) DEPENDENT INDEPENDENT X • If the actual location of your special district office is different from that of your registered agent, provide the district's business address in the space below: • Please return this form, to the address below: Derek lohnssen, General Accounting Manager Clerk of the Circuit Court Finance Department Court Plaza III 2671 Airport Road South Naples, FL 34112 .' ~ r' - ,.~,=~>- I'k." \i;~~~' \ ~~ ..~ " ,."\:. ',-"," 16 I . A 1 North f\!aples Fire Contro~ & Rescue District Board of Fire Con1iTlissioners 2010-2011 rVieeting Schedule THE NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS WILL HOLD ITS REGULAR MONTHLY MEETINGS ON THE FOLLOWING DATES COMMENCING @ 9:00 A.M. IN THE TRAINING ROOM AT THE NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT'S STATION 45, LOCATED AT 1885 VETERANS PARK DRIVE, NAPLES, FL 34109. I Thursday October 14, 2010 I 9:00 AM i Thursday November 18, 2010 I 9:00 AM I i i Thursday December 09,2010 I 9:00 AM 1 Thursday January 13, 2011 i 9:00 AM i ! I Thursday February 10, 2011 I 9:00 AM I I I I Thursday March 10,2011 i 9:00 AM I Thursday April 14, 2011 I 9:00 AM I I Thursday May 12, 2011 i 9:00 AM I I Thursday June 09, 2011 i 9:00 AM Thursday July 14, 2011 I 9:00 AM i Thursday August 11, 2011 I 9:00 AM I Thursday September 08, 2011 I 9:00 AM I I Chairman J. Christopher Lombardo Board of Fire Commissioners RUN FOR ONE DAY ONLY: September 20,2010 /c1p ADDRESS DESCRIPTIQH CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: BUILDING SIZE: HOSE TOWER PROPERTY TOTAL 1611AI4~ facuUtv Recordco Sta~ilon lJ10 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District 1441 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34109 Fire Station 1.05 acres DEHAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTIOI~ TYPE: CBS CBS LIVING QUARTERS: GARAGE: WORK AREA: OFFICE: STORAGE: 3,257 3,915 600 1,750 320 SQ FT: SQ.FT: SQ.FT : 9,842 184 10,026 APPARATUS AND EOUIPMENT ENGH~ES: PU~1PERS: HOSE: Watern Tenders: BRUSH: WOODS: ANTIQUE TOTAL APPARATUS: 2 STAFFING SHIFT CAPTAIN: LIEUTENANT: ENGINEERS: FIRE FIGHTERS: TOTAL STAFF: SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIHE: 1 o LADDERS: SQUAD: UTILITY: o o o o o o o COfV1fv1MJD: STAFF: o o FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION 1 5 6 6 18 10 Sq Hiles Urban 14,000 2,000 6.00 Hlnutes TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICf 96,947 Attachment E-l CLERICAL 16 , 1 A 1.~ Attachment E-2 fac;~itv Record= S1calt~O>fl1 &J.2 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS STATION 42 Date Updated 7010 Immokalee Rd. Naples. FL 34119 8/27/2010 DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE Fire Station DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue 129 acres CONSTRUCTIO!\J TYPE: CBS BUILDING SIZE: LIVING QUARTERS: GARAGE WORK AREA: OFFICE: STORAGE: 3.228 3,638 91 91 125 TOTAL SO FT: 7.173 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Ef\JGINES PUMPERS: HOSE: 1 o o LADDERS SUPPORT: UTILITY: o o 1 Water Tenders BRUSH: WOODS: 1 o COMMAND: STAFF: o o TOTAL APPARATUS 4 STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL CAPTAIN 1 LIEUTENANT: 2 ENGINEERS 6 FIRE FIGHTERS: 0 TOTAL STAFF: 9 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME 20 Sq Miles Urban 9,000 1,313 6.00 Minutes TOTAL POPULATION OF D!STRICT 96,947 16 11 A 1 Attachment E-3 Facilitv Record", StatiO~1 43 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS STATION 43 Date Updated 16325 Vanderbilt Dr, Bonita Springs, FL 3413"', 8/27/2010 DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE F~re Station DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue 1.26 acres CONSTRUCTIOf\J TYPE CBS BUILDING SIZE LIVING QUARTERS: GARAGE WORK AREA: OFFICE: STORAGE: 3,233 2,820 524 104 952 TOTAL SO FT: 7,633 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT ENGINES PUMPERS: HOSE TANKERS o o o o LADDERS SUPPORT: UTILITY BOAT: o 1 1 BRUSH: 0 COMMAND: 0 WOODS 0 STAFF: 0 TOTAL APPARATUS: ..., ,) STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL CAPTAIN 1 LIEUTENANT: 2 ENGINEERS 3 FIRE FIGHTERS 3 TOTAL STAFF: 9 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: 12 Sq Miles AREA TYPE Urban AREA POPULATION 10,000 CALLS PER YEAR: '1,228 AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME 6,00 Minutes TOTAL POPULATIOt\l OF DISTRICT 96,947 16 , 1 A 1 Attachment E-4 faciiitv Recorrd", Stzl~~orru .6J~ North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS STATION 44 Date Updated 8970 Hammock Oak Dr , Naples, Fl 34 i 08 8/27/20iO DESCRIPTION CAPACITY LAND SIZE Fire Station DEMAND Emergency Response Fire & Rescue N/A CONSTRUCTION TYPE CBS BUILDING SIZE LIVING QUARTERS GARAGE WORK AREA OFFICE STORAGE 5.976 3.744 249 359 458 TOTAL SQ FT: 10.7 86 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT ENGINES 1 lADDERS 1 PUMPERS 0 SUPPORT 1 HOSE 0 UTILITY 1 TANKERS 0 SQUAD 0 BRUSH 1 COMMAND 0 WOODS 0 STAFF 0 BOAT: 1 ATV 1 TOTAL APPARATUS 7 STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL CAPTAIN 1 LIEUTENANT 5 ENGINEERS 6 FIRE FIGHTERS 12 TOTAL STAFF 24 SERVICE ARE/-\ AREA SIZE 7 Sq Miles AREA TYPE Urban AREA POPULATION: 19.200 CALLS PER YEAR: 1,942 AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME 6.00 Minutes TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 16 , 1 A I Attachment E-5 FacaUtv Record", StatUO)ul 45 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District LAND SIZE 69 acres CONSTRUCTION TYPE CBS BUILDING SIZE LIVING QUARTERS GARAGE: RESIDENTIAL ASSEMBLY SQ FT 22,782 TRAIN TOWER GENERAL BUILDING PROPERTY TOTAL SQ. FT SQ FT SQ FT 2.332 308 25,422 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT ENGINES 1 SRU: 4 UTILITY 1 TRAINING VEHICLE 6 TRAILER 9 FPB 0 PUMPER 1 COMMAND 7 PIO 1 TOT AL APPARATUS 30 STAFFING SHIFT ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL BAT.CHIEF 3 CAPT AI N 4 CHIEF 1 FINANCIAL 2 LIEUTENANT 2 ASST CHIEF 2 ADMIN 2 ENGINEERS 3 DEPUTY CHIEF 2 FIRE FIGHTERS 9 BAT CHIEF 1 CAPTAIN 1 LIEUTENANT 0 PUBLIC INFOR 1 PEO/lnspector 1 IT 1 M,I,\PS 0 TOTAL STAFF 35 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE AREA TYPE AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME 8 Sq Miles Urban 21,000 1,471 600 Minutes TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 FACILITY NAME ADDRESS 16 \ lA 1 FaCD~itv Record", S1calt~Qlru 46 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District STATION 46 Date Updated 08/27/2010 3410 Pine Ridge Rd. DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: Fire Station DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue 4.25 Acres CONSTRUCTION TYPE: CBS BUILDING SIZE: Living Quarters 3.088 Garage 2,628 Work Area 399 Office 96 Storage 324 Total SQ.FT: 6.535 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: Ladder (reserve) Brush: TOTAL APPARATUS: 3 STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL CAPTAIN: 1 LIEUTENANT: 2 ENGINEERS: 3 FIRE FIGHTERS: 3 TOTAL STAFF: 9 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: 8 Sq Miles AREA TYPE: Urban AREA POPULATION: 14,000 CALLS PER YEAR: 1,284 AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME 6.00 Minutes TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 10 11 A 1 Facilitv Record"" Statnorr1! 41 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District BUILDING SIZE Living Quarters Garage Work Area Office Storage Total SQ.FT: APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: 1 TOTAL APPARATUS 5T AFFING SHIFT CAPTAIN: 1 LIEUTENANT: 2 1~1f"'\!~.!ccnC'. ~ CI'lI.:lII~LLI\0. FIRE FIGHTERS: 3 TOTAL STAFF 9 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT * divided by 3 owners FIRE PREVENTION 5 Sq Miles Urban 6,000 9 6 Minutes est. 4.357 3.720 650 392 388 9.507 ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL 96,947 16 j 1 A 1 FACILITY NAME ADDRESS Facilitv Recorda St-a~llon 4~ North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District STATION 48 Date Updated 08/27/2010 Livingston Rd. DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: lAND SIZE: Fire Station 3.28 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: BUilDING SIZE: RESIDENTIAL STORAGE: TOTAL SQUARE FT: APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: TOTAL APPARATUS: ST AFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL FIRE FIGHTERS: TOTAL STAFF: SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 5 Sq Miles Urban 6.000 1,200 est. 6 Minutes est TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 16 11 J\ 1 DESCRI PTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: Facilitv Recordlo StatBOti1 4S North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District STATION 49 Date Updated 08/27/10 810 Nursery Lane 815 Nursery Lane 560 Nursery Lane Fire Station DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue 26.35 Acres CONSTRUCTION TYPE: FACILITY NAME ADDRESS BUILDING SIZE: RESIDENTIAL STORAGE: TOTAL SQUARE FT: APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines. TOTAL APPARATUS: STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 5 Sq Miles Urban 6,000 1,200 est 6 Minutes est TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 16 1 ~ 1~~ FacuUtv Reco;&'"d", SW1~~~Jul 6~/~__~'i. North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS STATION 410 925 Oakes Blvd. Date Updated: 08/27/2010 DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: Fire Station 3.66 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire &. Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: CBS BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SQUARE FT: 9,507 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: TI1TL11 l\DDliPL:lTIIC:' I v II \1-' \1 I , \i" ,; ---.--" , ST AFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: o SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 5 Sq Miles Urban 6,000 1.200 est. 6 Minutes est. TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 10 l 1 A 1; Faci~utv RecondJc Statiorn ~:~ 1 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS STATION 411 Date Updated: 08/27/2010 1121 Sun Century Rd. DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: Fire Station DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue 1.6 ACRES CONSTRUCTION TYPE: STEEL BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SQUARE FT: 10,523 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: TOTAL APPARATUS: STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: o SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 5 Sq Miles Urban 6,000 1,200 est. 6 Minutes est. TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 161'1 Al Facilitv Record", Station 401 Tavior Road Facilitv North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District Taylor Rd. Date Updated 08/27/2010 6495 Taylor Rd. FACILITY NAME ADDRESS DESCRIPTION Maintenance, Warehouse & Office LAND SIZE: 1.6 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: CBS and Steel BUILDING SIZE: Building A Building B Building C TOTAL SQ, FT: 3039 6.156 9042 18.237 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: 1 Reserve Fire Prevention Bur 14 Support 3 Command 4 Utility 2 TOT AL APPARATUS: 23 ST AFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL Fire Marshal 1 Deputy Chief 2 Admin Assistant 2 Deputy Fire Mar 2 Battilion Chief 1 Inspectors 10 Mechanic 2 Computer Network -0- Logistics/Captain 1 Maintenance 1 TOTAL STAFF: 22 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: N/I-\ Urban N/A N/A N/A TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 16 , 1 \ 1 '~ j!. ; Facil~t,[ Record", 5604 K01th~ee&1 Court North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS 5604 Kathleen Ct. 5604 Kathleen Ct. Date Updated: 09/10109 DESCRIPTION Vacant Land LAND SIZE: .66 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: N/A BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SQ, FT: N/,6.. APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT TOTAL APPARATUS: N/A STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: N/A SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: N/A Urban N/A N/A N/A TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 16 '1 A 1 r(Olcn~~~v Recorda 5605; j{athJeeU1 COUrr't North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS 5605 Kathleen Ct. 5605 Kathleen Ct. Date Updated' 09/10/09 DESCRIPTION Vacant Land LAND SIZE: .65 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: N/A BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SQ. FT: N/A APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT TOTAL APPARATUS: N/A ST AFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: N/A SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: N/A Urban N/A N/A N/A TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 961947 16 \.i. A 1 faci;atv Record~ 1945 Pane RjdQl~ Road North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS 1945 Pine Ridge Rd. 1945 Pine Ridge Rd. Date Updated: 09/10109 DESCRIPTION Vacant Land LAND SIZE: 1.78 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: N/A BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SQ. FT: N/A APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT TOTAL APPARATUS: N/A STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: N/A SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: N/A Urban N/A N/A N/A TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 16 I 1 A 1, facBit'l Recordlc Boat [}lock North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District ADDRESS Bi05 Vanderbilt Dr., Slip 47 DESCRIPTION Boat Slip LAND SIZE: NII\ DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Dock BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SO. FT: N/A APPARATUS AND EOUIPMHH Fire/Rescue boat 1 TOTAL APPARATUS: ST AFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: N/A SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: Gulf and back waters Water N/A N/A N/A TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 16 If' lA rw North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District BJBlbb 8-25-10 APPROBED BY BOFe 9-19-10 (NNFCRD) Five Year Strategic Plan Presented by: Fire Chief Orly Stolts Assistant Chief Becky Bronsdon Assistant Chief James Cunningham Deputy Chief Michael Swanson Deputy Chief Jorge Aguilera Deputy Chief Joe Hessling Deputy Chief Sal D' Angelo Presented to: Board of Fire Commissioners J. Christopher Lombardo, Chairman Margaret Hanson, Vice Chair Paul J. Moriarty Sr., Treasurer John McGowan, Commissioner M. James Burke, Commissioner 16 r!1A f4If Mission Statement The mission of the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District is to protect life and property from fire and other emergencies through incident response, public education and code enforcement, while delivering the highest level of service, including Advanced Life Support Services, to our residents through the prudent management of our time, resources and personnel. BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY SOFe 9-09-10 2 16 11 Ail Table of Contents Mission Statement........ ........... ....... ........................................................ ............ ............... 2 North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District .................................................................. 5 History. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Current Resources and Service Delivery ..................... .............. ............... ...... .................... 8 Stations. Apparatus and Personnel........................................... ........ ...... ......... .................... 8 Apparatus and On Duty Staffing: ...................................................................................... 11 Emergency Medical Services............................................................................................ 15 Special Operations..... ...... ................. ..... ........... .................................. .......... ........ .... ........ 15 Fire Response Assignments. ........... .... .................. ..... ................. .............. ...... .................. 16 Emergency Service Performance ...................................................................................... 17 Response Times and Goals....................................... ........... .............. ........ ........ ........... 1921 Response Time Sequence ............ ............. ........................................... ...... ................. ...... 20 Non-Emergency Services.................................................................................................. 21 Fire Prevention Bureau........................................................................... ..21 Other Programs .......... ............. ............................. .................... ....... ....... ..................... ...... 28 Support Staff................... .......... ........... ............................ .................................. ............... 29 Support Services.............. ............... ..... ...... .... ..................................................... .............. 32 Training..................................................................................................................... ........ 33 Safety within the District......... ......................................... .... ................ ....... ................ ..... 33 Emergency Dispatch......................................................................................................... 34 Special District Public Facilities Report .......... .............. ...... ............ ................. ........ ........ 35 Human Resources Management............................. .......................... ....................... .......... 35 Information Management and Technology .................. .......... ........... ........ ........ .......... ...... 36 OPERATIONAL PLAN SUMMARy.............................................................................. 38 Year 1 Budget Year 2010 - 2011....................................................................... 37 Year 2 Budget Year 2011 - 2012......................................................................38 Year 3 Budget Year 2012 - 2013 ......................................................................39 Year 4 Budget Year 2013 - 2014......................................................................40 Year 5 Budget Year 2014 - 2015......................................................................41 Goals in the Next Five Years ............................................................................................ 44 Capital Improvements Program....... ....................................................................... .......... 45 Elements of the Program........... ........... ...... .............. ............. ........... ................................. 46 Program Calendar for Each U pcoming Year .................................................................... 47 Definitions. .... .... ... ........ ............. ...... .... ............................ ............. ......... ............ ..... ..... ...... 47 Limits of the Program ...... ........ ............... ...... ............ ........................... ......... .................... 47 PROPERTY OWNED AND LAND ACQUISTIONS .....................................................48 FACILITIES..... ................. ....... ............ ............................ ............... ...... ............. .... ...... ..... 48 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................ 49 Summation........................................................................................................................ 65 Attachment A ............... ......................................... ...... ............... ................... .......... .......... 66 Attachment B ....... .............. ................... ....... ........ ............................. ................... .... ......... 67 Attachment C .. ............... .... .......... ................................ .... ......... ..... ............ ..... .......... ........ 68 Attachment D............ ... ................ ................ .... ...... ...... ........... .................. .... ............ ........ 69 BJB/bb 8-24- I 0 3 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 16 .~1 A 1 Facility Record- Station 40 ............................ ..................................... .... .... ...... ................ 65 Facility Record- Station 42 ............. .... ....................................................................... ....... 66 Facility Record- Station 43 .................. ...................................................... ....................... 67 Facility Record- Station 44 ..... ......................................... ........................ .............. ........... 68 Facility Record- Station 45 ....... ......................... .................................. .... .................... ..... 69 Facility Record- Station 46 ... ........................................... .......................................... ....... 70 Facility Record- Station 47 . ...... ....... .................... ..................................... ..... .......... ......... 71 Facility Record- Station 48 ........... ....................... ............ .............. ...... ............. ................ 72 Facility Record- Station 49 ............. ..... .................. ...... ......................... ................. ........... 73 Facility Record- Station 410 ............................................................................................. 74 Facility Record- Station 411 ............................................................................................. 75 Facility Record- Station 401 - Taylor Road Facility ......................................................... 76 Facility Record- Center Lane...... ..... .................. .......... .................. ...... ............................. 77 Facility Record- 5604 Kathleen Court .............................................................................. 78 Facility Record- 5605 Kathleen Court ....... .............. .................................... .... ................. 79 Facility Record- 1945 Pine Ridge Road............................................................................ 80 Facility Record- Boat Dock.. ............ ........................... ............ ........... ..................... .... ..... 81 Summary of Facility Records.............. ........ .......................... .................. ................... ....... 82 BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 4 16 I 1 A 1J North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District is an independent special taxing district established by the State of Florida in 1961. According to the Collier County Graphics Department, this District provides fire and rescue services to seventy (70) square miles within Northern Collier County, which includes commercial, residential and multifamily units located within Naples, Florida. The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District is under the leadership of Fire ChiefOrly Stolts, who reports to an elected five-member Board of Fire Commissioners. The North Naples area is expected to continue growing, but at a slower pace than has been realized in the past. The 2010 population estimated for the North Naples Fire District is 96,947. This reflects an annual increase in population of less than 2,000, or 2% (See Attachment A). When compared to the increase in population from 2005 of 24 percent from 78,062, the slow down in growth is apparent. Anticipated call volume will also rise from approximately 12,000 annually to about 15,966 in 2015; see Attachment (B) for more details. Infrastructure of the various communities is expected to keep pace with the population growth, but there will be a challenge in the congestion of transportation routes throughout this area in overall District response. Geography of the District and the development of new transportation routes will be closely monitored by the District in order to significantly reduce response times to various calls. The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District provides a full range of services, including non-transport first response to Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Life Support (ALS) to medical emergencies. The District operates out of seven (7) stations and maintains six (6) engine companies, and three (3) ladder companies; manning a total of nine (9) apparatus. At the 90th percentile, response time performance to structure fires was seven (7) minutes or less (Collier County Dispatch, 2005). The District's rating by the Insurance Services Organization is a 3 on a range of 1-10, with one (1) being the best. This class 3 BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 5 16 11 it 1 rating places the District in the top 5% of all fire departments nationally. It also results in a cost savings to owners of residential, commercial and industrial property located within the District, and serves as an external verification of the exemplary job the District does in protecting life and property. The District also provides a variety of support functions such as inspections for fire code compliance in new and existing commercial and multi-family structures within North Naples. The Fire Prevention Bureau works closely with the Collier County Fire Code Officials to provide uniformity of code interpretation throughout all of the fire districts within Collier County. A strong emphasis on public education is also important to the District and this task is also fulfilled through the Fire Prevention Bureau. The District has benefited from the impact fees and revenue sources including both ad valorem taxation and developmental impact fees as well as fees for inspections, occupational licenses, flow test, hydrant maintenance, thrust block inspections and firework permits. Revenues from Ad Valorem and Impact Fees have historically increased. However; because of the economic factors currently in play, these funds have decreased substantially over the last three fiscal years. That trend is expected to continue and is reflected in the estimated revenues. After a thorough analysis of community development conditions and trends, operational methodology, resources, resource distribution, accepted industry standards and other factors, this report will provide recommendations for maintaining and/or improving the services provided by the District. Among the most significant recommendations contained in the Critical Issues and Recommendations are the following five major factors: 1. The need for the addition of two (2) Fire Stations, one (1) Engine Company and one (1) Ladder Company during the next five (5) years has been identified. However, due to financial constraints in both the General Fund and the Impact Fee Fund, only provision for the addition of one (1) Fire Station and one (1) Engine Company to bring the total to eight (8) Fire Stations, seven (7) Engines and three (3) Ladders is BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 6 16 11A~_ reflected. 2. While continued analysis of the District's organizational structure for greater efficiency of District operations has identified the anticipated need for additional personnel at the administration level as well as the shift level, due to financial constraints anticipated in the General Fund, there are no provisions for additions of any personnel. 3. Commitment to maintaining apparatus replacement schedule and facilities maintenance schedule by establishing and maintaining a reserve fund will be accomplished as funding is available. Historv North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District is an organization that is dedicated to the citizens of North Naples by adhering to a high standard of professionalism in everyday operations. This NNFCRD has an impressive history of rapid growth and change that had created some unique challenges to its development, while at the same time equipping its members to adapt to new ideas and methods. The District was initially established in 1961 as a small, rural volunteer fire organization protecting the homes of residents of North Naples. It was designated as an independent taxing district in 1965 by the Florida Legislature, providing a method for consistent and adequate financial resources. It is located in the Northwestern tip of Collier County, and encompasses an area of seventy (70) square miles. Today, the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District maintains a high degree of professionalism, accountability, and responsibility to the citizens of the community. There is a clear understanding among the staff that the District has the full potential to become recognized as a leading organization in the fire service, providing a full array of modern, professional services to the community. Services currently provided by the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District include: ~ All types of Fire Response ~ Emergency Medical Services (ALS and BLS) ~ Hazardous Materials Response ~ Vehicle Extrication BJBtbb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 7 1611AlI ~ Special Operations (Ops): low/high angle, confined space, trench, and building collapse rescues ~ Beach Patrol ~ Water Rescue/Boat operations ~ Fire Prevention and Code Compliance Inspection ~ Fire Investigation ~ Public Fire and Life Safety Education ~ Dive Rescue ~ Community Emergency Response Team, (C.E.R.T.) ~ Serving our Seniors, AKA S.O.S. North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District also demonstrates effective working relationships with other city and fire districts of neighboring jurisdictions. The District established mutual aid agreements with neighboring fire districts and municipalities. These agreements ensure that each district or municipality has access to additional resources during major emergencies. Current Resources and Service Deliverv Stations. Apparatus and Personnel Fire departments need a balance of three basic resources to carry out their emergency mission successfully; specifically people, equipment and facilities. Because firefighting is an extremely physical pursuit, the adequacy of personnel resources is a primary concern, but no matter how many firefighters there are, there must also be significant fire apparatus distribution and standards of station coverage in order for the fire apparatus to protect the community of North Naples in an efficient manner. North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District has one-hundred eleven firefighters and nine apparatus deployed from seven fire stations. One more station will be added to increase this coverage within the next five years. Currently, the numbering of the stations and locations are as follows: BJBlbb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 8 16 I J. A 1 · Station 40, located at 1441 Pine Ridge Road · Station 42, located at 7010 Immokalee Road · Station 43, located at 16325 Vanderbilt Drive · Station 44, located at 8970 Hammock Oak Drive · Station 45, located at 1885 Veterans Park Drive · Station 46, located at 3410 Pine Ridge Road · Station 47,2795 N. Airport-Pulling Road · Station 48, Livingston Road, to be built within the next five (5) years · Station 49, Nursery Lane - future planned location - Construction delayed due to funding · Station 410 925 Oaks Boulevard, future planned location - Construction delayed due to funding · Station 411 121 Sun Century Road future planned location - Construction delayed due to funding · Station 401, Support Services Head Quarters, 6495 Taylor Road Station 40 is the oldest station within the District, built in 1983 (Collier County Permitting Department, 2003). This station will be closely monitored for any structural deterioration. Improvements to this station as well as to other stations within the District will be made as deemed necessary by the Board of Fire Commissioners. Firefighters assigned to each fire station are responsible for emergency first response in a correspondingly numbered "Response District". It is important to note that the distribution and the size of the territories has as much to do with growth history as with geography, and demand of the population this District serves. North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District strives to serve the growing population by increasing the number of stations and coverage locations as development and growth continues. However, economic conditions over the last few years have resulted in a reduction in both general fund and impact fee fund revenue. This loss of revenue has affected the District's ability to construct new stations and add personnel where need has been identified. BJBfbb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 9 16 J lA 11 The Insurance Services Office (ISO) rates fire departments based on a complex schedule of measurements that covers a wide range of factors significant to fire protection. The ISO classification provides insurance companies with a standard estimation of conflagration risk for fire insurance rating. One component that the schedule weighs is the distribution of fire companies within the community. This grading schedule suggests that developed areas in a city should have a fire department within 1 1/2 miles travel distance. (Insurance Services Office, 2003). A circular response area with a radius of 1 1/2 miles encompasses about seven square miles, less than the current average service area of existing stations. At seventy square miles, our District should have ten stations. We have identified eleven locations within our District to be considered for station locations as growth dictates and funding allows. The location of fire stations within the District is currently distributed to cover the response areas within the District. However, the need for new stations to respond to areas of new development of single family and multi-homes has been identified. Target areas identified as in need of improvement in response times are located in the following areas: 1. Immokalee Road, West ofl-75, and along Livingston Road North 2. Collier Blvd. (formerly 951), Broken Back Rd. and Immokalee Road. 3. U.S. 41 and Old U.S. 41 area, and additionally; 4. Livingston Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. Currently, the highest call volume and response rate is estimated to be from Station 40, Station 44 and Station 45 respectively. Station 45 has a training tower and a training facility to meet the current training needs of firefighters and citizens. Training rooms will be added to other planned stations to facilitate the ongoing education requirements of the professional firefighter. The General Fund Budget ofthe North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District for the fiscal year 2010-2011 contains the financial provisions for a total of 151 employees and elected BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 10 16 11 A 1 officials. The classifications are as follows: · Fire Rescue Line Personnel: .....................................78 · Fire Rescue Line Officer Personnel: ................................ .. .30 · Fire Rescue Special Ops, Logistics, EMS Coordinator..... ...3 · F ire Rescue Training Officers:.. .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. 4 · Fire Prevention and Inspection Personnel. . . . . . . . '" . . . . . . . . . . . 15 · Fire Rescue Officers Non-Bargaining Unit Personnel: ......... 7 · Administrative Personnel: ..................... ................ ..... ........ ..... 7 · Mechanics............................................................................. 2 · Elected Fire Officials: ............................................................. 5 Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District is an Equal Opportunity Employer (EOE), and the District strives to meet all applicable standards set by the E.E.O.C., as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act. A future five-year goal is identified to expand the Human Resource Division within this District so as to directly address labor relations, benefits and federal and state regulation compliance. However, this expansion is not provided for in the current Plan due to anticipated financial constraints. The current District established minimum apparatus staffing is three firefighters per engine and aerial company. North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District's current minimum staffing reflects twenty- eight field operations personnel on duty twenty-four hours per day. Assuming a rather conservative leave ratio of 20% for vacation, Kelly Days, and personal leave we allow for personnel to be off duty for reasons including but not limited to sick time, family leave, workers compensation, military, disability, jury duty, etc., the District assigns a minimum of thirty-six response personnel to each of its three shifts and with only seven scheduled off the District meets preferred staffing. BJBibb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 11 16 11 A 1 Apparatus and On-Duty Staffina - Table Assigned Assigned Preferred Safe Station # Apparatus ID Staffing Staffine: Staffine: 1 40 Engine 40 94 5 4 3 2 40 Ladder 40 98 4 4 3 3 42 Engine 42 109 4 4 3 4 43 Ladder 43 934 4 4 3 5 44 Tower 44 933 4 4 3 6 44 Engine 44 92 5 4 3 7 44 SRU 44 90 0 0 0 8 44 Medic 44 1 0 0 9 45 BC-40 1994 I 1 I 10 45 Engine 45 93 5 4 3 11 46 Engine 46 110 4 4 3 12 45 Reserve 2 97 0 0 0 13 46 Tower 40 Reserve 96 0 0 0 14 To be Reserve Engine N/A 0 0 0 Assigned 15 45 Captain 41 932 1 1 N/A 16 42 Brush 42 80 0 0 0 17 44 Brush 44 81 0 0 0 18 46 Brush 46 79 0 0 0 19 45 SRU 41 91 0 0 0 20 45 SRU 45 86 0 0 0 21 47 Engine 47 115 4 4 3 22 Boat Dock Boat 41 968 0 0 0 23 Shop Reserve 1 127 0 0 0 24 45 TRNGl 88 0 0 0 25 44 U40T 1411 0 0 0 26 Shop U42 53 0 0 0 27 44 BP44 T 2971 0 0 0 28 44 BP44 1296 0 0 0 29 44 U40 1447 0 0 0 30 40 Boat 40 56 0 0 0 31 40 BT40 56-T 0 0 0 32 45 BT41 1100 0 0 0 33 44 Boat 43 55 0 0 0 34 44 Boat 44 1248 0 0 0 35 43 BT43 55-T 0 0 0 36 44 BT44 1247 0 0 0 37 45 HM41 63 0 0 0 38 45 HM42 113 0 0 0 39 46 HUR 41 766 0 0 0 40 46 HUR 42 767 0 0 0 41 Sun Century HUR 43 1116 0 0 0 42 45 CER T 40 64 0 0 0 43 45 GEN 45 119 0 0 0 44 45 TRT 41 62 0 0 0 45 45 AIR 45 114 0 0 0 46 45 FT A Air 1133 0 0 0 47 45 TRT 42 765 0 0 0 BJBlbb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 12 16 I 1Al 48 73 PETC 54 0 0 0 49 BT44A 43631 0 0 0 50 Shoo Investigation 1991 0 0 0 51 45 BST2 WT8F 0 0 0 52 45 BSTl WT8E 0 0 0 53 42 WT42 2977 0 1 I Totals 42 30 28 The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District operates a fleet of front line apparatus that includes six engines, three aerial apparatus, including two ladder trucks and one tower ladder, one rescue unit and one water tender. All of these were determined to be in good working condition by the North Naples Maintenance Shop. The model year of the front line apparatus ranges from 1998 to 2009. Average age of the front line fleet is 8.6 years. In addition to the front line fleet, the District holds one engine, and one telesquirt, as well as one tower in reserve. The telesquirt and tower are categorized in fair condition. The reserve units are used to replace front line units when they are out for repair or service. The reserve vehicles range in years from 1983 to 2004. The District also maintains a fleet of general staff support vehicles listed below: Apparatus and On Dutv Staffin2: Vehicle: Fixed Asset Use 1. Ford F-250 1117 Safety Officer 2. Ford Ranger 61 Beach Patrol 3. Ford Van 250 74 K-9 and Deliveries to Stations 4. Ford Expedition 84 U43 5. Ford F350 86 SRU 45 6. Ford Expedition 103 Shift 7. Ford F550 935 SRU42 8. Ford F550 1086 SpecialOps Support Services: Vehicle: Fixed Asset Use 1. Chevy Van 66 Maintenance 2. Ford Ranger 78 Mechanic Take Home 3. Ford F450 121 Mechanic 4. Ford F150 461 Logistics BJBlbb 8-24-10 13 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 5. I Ford F250 3007 I Maintenance 16 j lAtlJ I Trainine:: Vehicle: Fixed Asset Use 1. Ford F150 2. Ford Crown Vic 3. Ford Ex edition 4. Ford Ex edition 5. Ford Ex edition 65 77 101 107 932 Reserve Reserve Reserve Trainin Commander T rainin Ca tain Chief Officers/Administration: Vehicle: 1. Ford Expedition 228 Chief 40 2. Ford Explorer 229 Chief 41 3. Ford F250 123 Chief 42 4. Ford Expedition 124 Chief 43 5. Ford Expedition 927 Chief 44 6. Ford Expedition 928 Chief 45 7. Ford Expedition 929 Chief 46 8. Ford Expedition 102 Battalion Chief 42/Facilities 9. Ford Explorer 82 LT. 10. Ford Explorer 83 Reserve Inspection Bureau: Vehicle: 1. Ford Explorer 117 Fire Marshal 2. Ford Explorer 126 Deputy Fire Marshal 3. Ford F150 931 Deputy Fire Marshal 4. Ford Taurus 108 Inspector 5. Ford Taurus 111 Inspector 6. Ford Taurus 112 Inspector 7. Ford Ranger P IU 128 Inspector 8. Ford F150 266 Inspector 9. Ford F150 344 Inspector 10. Ford F150 930 Inspector 11. Ford F150 1223 Inspector 12. Ford F150 1224 Inspector 13. Ford F150 1409 Inspector 14. Ford Taurus 59 Reserve BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 14 16 j .L A 1" 15. Ford Taurus 16. Ford Explorer 60 227 Reserve Inspector Grand Total All Vehicles - Line and Support ........................................................ 97 Emer2:encv Medical Services The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District currently responds to Emergency Medical Calls in both the capacity of a Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Life Support (ALS) and First response vehicles. A 911 call is received into the Sheriff's Office dispatch center and is appropriately coded based on the information provided by the caller. The call is further triaged through a program called Emergency Medical Dispatching ("EMD") to assist in determining the acuity level of the call for service. If the injury is life threatening or if an EMS unit is not within the response area, Fire is dispatched accordingly. Our District currently employs 54 paramedics. Transport is provided by Collier County EMS. On occasion, when a patient's condition dictates, additional support is provided to the transporting EMS unit when a District firefighter/paramedic or EMT rides along, to assist in the delivery of patient care. The District's current practice is to hire firefighter/paramedics in order to increase the Districts flexibility in providing the highest level of service to the residents. The District shall continue to be proactive in facilitating current employees' educational advancement by attending Paramedic school. The District will continue to evaluate the medical needs of our residents and work with the Office of The Medical Director to expand and improve the District's participation in the level of ALS services provided. Special Operations The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District provides various extrication services. BJBlbb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 15 16 j;l A 1 The District strives to maintain a high level of training to be prepared to handle emergencies such as those requiring vertical line rope rescues, confined space, trench collapse, swift water and deep water rescue. The District participates with the U.S. Coast Guard in boat rescue and fire fighting operations with the District's four (4) boats. Boat 41 is equipped with a 750 gpm fire pump. The District has thirty-seven (37) State Certified Haz-Mat Technicians and equipment to respond to Hazardous Materials and Weapons of Mass Destruction. Currently there are thirty-six (36) firefighters assigned to a shift at NNFCRD. Significant time is spent training on these specialized skills in order to ensure an adequate number of trained individuals are available to handle an incident at any given time. Skill mastery and retention becomes a significant concern when combining these training demands with normal firefighter in-service advanced firefighting courses, hazardous materials training, dive team training, boat operations training, inspector training, and officer development programs. In a district such as North Naples, specialized certifications, training and advanced skill development are essential elements in the provision of service to the residents of the District. Fire Response Assi2nments The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District has developed standard assignments for the dispatch of personnel and apparatus to various types of calls for service. These assignments vary from as many as seven (7) emergency vehicles to as few as one (1), depending on the type and severity of the emergency. The following table lists the assignments. While we judge them as typical of the industry as far as the number of apparatus, current North Naples Fire District staffing conditions could result in the response of as few as twelve (12) firefighters to structure fires, depending on the type of fire dispatched. This could create safety concerns on initial operations, particularly mid to large sized structures. However, larger sized structures would have six (6) additional personnel responding. It is also important to note that we maintain a minimum staffing of three (3) on all engines and ladder companies. However, according to NFP A 1710 these apparatus should have at least a minimum of four (4) on duty personnel assigned. NFP A 1710 further states that there should be five (5) to six (6) firefighters per vehicle when a district has high hazard occupancies. Our District recognizes that we have a significant number of high BJBlbb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 16 16 f 1 A 1 hazard occupancies. Prior to 2007, the District hired firefighting personnel with the intent of staffing fire engines with four; however, recognizing the financial impact of the decline in property values, the District proactively ceased hiring firefighting personnel to staff apparatus at the NFPA recommended level. To date we have 18 unfilled operational positions. EMS calls: House Fires: All other fires: Commercial Fires: High Rise Fires: Engines ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~'~~ Ladders ~ ~~ ~~ Emer2encv Service Performance The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District responds to a variety of emergencies. There was a mix of emergency responses made by the District for the period of 2009. Incident Totals by Type Sassed on Calendar Year 2009 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 o "0 JH ('(10 (])O c::: 10_ (])...- ..... (/) >-= () ('(I ~Oro 0)-0) .....('(10) (]) .2 LO E"O W (]) ~ +-' c10 ~O) .- ~ () - cN ~ 5 (])+:l ::J ('(I () .2> (/)~ 0)::::2: c::: u.. Fire Related calls in 2009 comprised 15% of the total responses; roughly 60% of the emergencies handled by the District were for emergency medical assistance and 25% were classified rescue and incident mitigation. BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 17 16 11 Al Because the workload of this fire district fluctuates, it is important to know when calls are occurring, including time of day, day of week and month of year. Creative deployment solutions can be developed based on this information. The charts below represent 2009 data. Responses by time of day vary significantly, as is expected. Peak response loads occur between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Incident Occurrences Based on Time of Day Based on Calendar Year 2009 22:00 19:00 >- 16:00 ca c "'" 13:00 0 CD E 10:00 j:: 7:00 4:00 1:00 0 288. -325 i- , .... ., 394 .. 437 200 400 600 800 Incidents Per Time of Day Information created by North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District RedAlert Reporting system, NFIRS 5.0 BJ8/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 18 16 j 1 A 1 There is a fairly significant variation in responses by month. The chart below shows the total runs by month for 2009. While not significant at this point in time, growth will certainly exacerbate the difference in terms of crew workload. December November October September Aug ust July June May April March February January Based on Calendar Year 2009 o 200 400 600 800 1,000 1 ,200 Information created by North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District RedAlert Reporting system, NFIRS Response Times and Goals A goal ofa six (6) minute response time to emergency calls for service is an ambitious goal given the widespread geographical nature and traffic congestion ofthe service area. BJBtbb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 19 16 11 A l The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District structure fire response for the first arriving unit for the calendar year 2009 were analyzed to determine the following: ~ The average dispatch-to- en-route time: 2.4 minutes (dispatching the calls) ~ The average en-route-to-arrive time: 6.43 minutes ~ Total from dispatch-to-on scene average: 8.02 minutes for reported structure fire in 2009. Data collected from the Collier County Dispatch Center is shown in hundredths of a minute. This includes both residential and commercial responses. For example, .5 minutes equals 30 seconds. As indicated above, the average number of responses exceeds the six (6) minute goal. Time of day also has some influence on response time performance (rush hour, etc.). Response time performance within each of the "District" fire station coverage areas shows little variation. This suggests that response time improvements will need to focus on improving geographic coverage rather than increasing the number of response units in each given station area. The following section discusses factors that influence response time in more detail and reviews the analysis of issues significantly impacting response time performance for North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District. Response Time Sequence There are eight (8) stages of events that occur from the inception of the emergency being detected until arrival of response crews. The amount of time these stages take directly influences overall accomplishment of a response time objective. These stages are: 1. Detection - The discovery that an emergency exists. 2. Report - The establishment of contact with the Emergency Communications BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 20 16 J lA 1 . Center (ECC) - Calling 911. 3. Call Triage- The activity of the ECC call-taker to establish the nature of the emergency. 4. Call Processing - The identification of which units should be dispatched based on the nature of the emergency. 5. Dispatch - The notification of response units of the type and location of the emergency based on availability. In the event the primary unit is on call, the next closest unit would be dispatched. 6. Turnout - The time between Dispatch and the first movement of the vehicle(s) towards the location of the emergency. 7. Travel - The time taken to travel from the response unit's location at the time of dispatch to arrival at the location of the emergency. 6. Setup - A variety of tasks accomplished by response crews to prepare for initiation of incident intervention (checking for occupants and hazards, setting up hose lines, establishing water supply, etc.). The two most relevant stages for the purpose of this analysis are turnout and travel. Turnout and travel times for this time period were analyzed to determine the overall effect they had on a six-minute response time objective. Based on this analysis, it is clear that wide-spread geographic coverage contributes to long travel times, thus resulting in response time performance being outside of the goal of six (6) minutes 90% of the time. Non-Emer2:encv Services Fire Prevention Bureau Fire districts routinely provide a variety of services to the community that do not involve emergency response. These services have a significant impact on the ability of the fire district to accomplish its primary mission. The mission of the Fire Prevention Bureau is to minimize the risk oflife and property loss from fire by controlling and eliminating hazardous BJBlbb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 21 16 11 AJ conditions before a fire occurs. A well planned and executed fire inspection and public education program is an effective way to accomplish this mission. For instance, fire inspection, code enforcement, and public education can be methods of reducing the occurrence of fire by eliminating the precursors to fire and teaching fire safety. It is always better to prevent a fire rather than fight it. Therefore, these are direct steps toward protecting the community from the dangers of fire. It has been shown that aggressive fire inspection and code enforcement programs can reduce fire occurrences by eliminating ignition sources. In addition, proper enforcement of life safety codes can improve the chances of survival for occupants should a fire occur. The Fire Prevention Bureau operates with a staff of fifteen personnel, including the Fire Marshal, two Deputy Fire Marshals, nine Fire Inspectors, one Public Education Officer, and two Administrative Assistants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is located in the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District Support Services Headquarters building at 6495 Taylor Road. The primary responsibilities assigned to the Fire Prevention Bureau are divided into the four Divisions as listed below: ~ Existing Building Inspections ~ New Construction Inspections ~ Public Education ~ Fire Investigation In 2008, the Fire Prevention Bureau met one of its major long term goals and began utilizing a data based management software program, "One-Step", to manage their fire inspection program. Despite the initial challenges of data entry training and software problems, the benefits of researching and tracking inspection records electronically are already being realized. BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY SaFe 9-09-10 22 16 11 A 1 One of the special tasks and a major accomplishment of the Existing Building Division in 2007 was the locating by GPS reading, identifying with a standard tag, and the computerized mapping of the Fire District's approximate 6,000 fire hydrants. This achievement advanced the Fire District's ability to manage its water supply system significantly. The requirement to inspect, flow, and lubricate each fire hydrant is accomplished by the Fire Operations Division. In 2009, the District entered into an Interlocal Agreement with Collier County to take ownership and maintain the fire hydrants on County water lines located in front of the back flow device. The District will provide initial funding over the course of three fiscal years to assist the County in creating the necessary infrastructure to maintain and service these hydrants. At the conclusion of the three year period, the County Water Department will have the responsibility for funding the maintenance and repair of these hydrants. Existing Building Inspections: The Existing Building Division is currently staffed with one Deputy Fire Marshal and five Fire Inspectors. Based on data provided by the Fire Marshal's monthly and annual reports, there are approximately 6,000 commercial and multi-family residential buildings located within the Fire District. There are several target hazards that pose an increased life safety risk to the occupants and potential high hazard conditions to responding firefighters. They have been identified as follows: 4 major resorts, 64 high rises, 101 mid rises, 26 child care facilities, 11 schools, 18 healthcare facilities, 2 hospitals, 24 golf course maintenance facilities, and 3 industrial parks. The main objective of the Existing Building Division is to conduct fire inspections of existing commercial and multi-family residential buildings to insure compliance with the Florida Fire Prevention Code. In addition, they conduct Certificate of Occupancy fire inspections, follow-up inspections on Notices of Violations issued by the Fire Operations Division, night inspections of assembly occupancies, respond to complaints made by citizens, and ensure the compliance of existing fire protection systems and fire hydrants. The short term goal of the Existing Building Division is to conduct fire inspections on all buildings within the Fire District every three years, and to maintain an efficient systematic BJBlbb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFe 9-09-10 23 16 , 1 10'a_; 1 1 Existing Building Fire Inspection Program. Facilities requiring annual state licensing as well as target hazards will have inspections conducted on a more frequent basis. All annual fire safety inspections that were required by law including healthcare, childcare and schools were conducted in both 2008 and 2009. In 2009, the Existing Building Division conducted 2,311 * Existing Building Fire Inspections, 360* Existing Building Fire Re-Inspections, and 566* Occupational License Fire inspections for a total of3,237* Fire Inspections. The 20 I 0 goal of the Existing Building inspection program will be to conduct annual fire inspections on 33% of the Fire District's buildings. With the assistance of One-Step data base software system, the Fire District now has the capability to identify buildings by their last annual or occupational license inspection date. Buildings identified as not having an annual or occupational license inspection in the past three years will be given priority and assigned first. As of July 31,20 I 0, the Existing Building Division has conducted 1,281 * Existing Building Fire Inspections and 246* Occupational License Inspections for a total of 1,527* Fire Inspections. In order to have a highly effective Existing Building Inspection Program, it will require the annual inspection of all commercial and multi-family buildings. This is the long term goal of the Division. Based on the number of buildings presently located within the Fire District, this will require are-evaluation of the systems used to conduct existing building. inspections and possibly the addition of four more Existing Building Inspectors. New Construction Inspections: The New Construction Division is currently staffed with one Deputy Fire Marshal and four Fire Inspectors. The primary responsibility of the New Construction Division is to review and verify that the design, construction, alteration, modification, and repair of all buildings under construction within the Fire District are compliant with both the Florida Fire BJB/bb 8-24- JO APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 24 16 j 1 Al' Prevention Code and the plans approved by the Collier County Fire Code Official. In addition, every life safety system (fire alarm, fire sprinkler, fire pump, emergency generator, private underground fire main, private hydrant, kitchen fire suppression system, and kitchen ventilation system) receives a separate Collier County permit and must be inspected and verified to be fire compliant. Multiple inspections are necessary during the various stages of construction of both the building permits and life safety system permits in order to insure the provisions of the code are met. In the year 2009, the New Construction Division conducted 4,759* New Construction Inspections and 317* Certificate of Occupancy Fire Inspections for a total of 5,076* Inspections. As of July 31, 2010, the New Construction Division conducted 2,579* New Construction Inspections and 282* Certificate of Occupancy Fire Inspections for a total of 2,861 * Inspections. Inspections are scheduled by the building contractor when the structure is ready for an inspection. The inspection is scheduled within a 24 to 48 hour time frame. The New Construction Division consistently meets this scheduling goal. * Data provided by the Fire Marshal's monthly and annual reports. Public Education: The overall objective of the Public Education Division is to encourage the members of our community to practice fire safety and to protect themselves and their families from the dangers of fires. The Public Education Officer, with additional support from the firefighters from the Fire Operations Division and fire inspectors from the Fire Prevention Bureau, provided safety awareness classes to public and private schools, child daycare centers, youth summer camps, businesses, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and other special groups within our BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 25 1611Al'f community. During 2010, the Public Education Officer also certified several hundred residents and employees of businesses located within the District in the use of fire extinguishers utilizing a fire extinguisher training device purchased by the District in 2008. It is anticipated the many more District residents will attend and obtain certification in the use of fire extinguishers in the coming fiscal year. The North Naples Fire Prevention Bureau is dedicated to an aggressive outreach program to its citizens that will require the participation and support of the Fire Prevention Bureau, the Fire Operations Division, and the Public Education Officer. Campaigns are constantly being developed to encourage and educate target audiences to practice fire safety or establish their own fire safety education programs. Within the next two years, it is a goal of the Fire Prevention Bureau to develop several more "model" public education programs, including the following: >> Healthcare provider fire safety training program >> Childcare provider fire safety training In 2006, the Existing Building Division developed a unique inspection and public education method for childcare facilities. This team based "Pit Crew" system not only added several advantages to the inspection, but provided a unique opportunity to provide public education simultaneously. In 2007, the New Construction Division developed and presented its first contractor inspection training class. By providing this type of education to the construction industry, the Prevention Bureau hopes to reduce needless and costly construction errors. In 2007 and 2008, the Fire Marshal participated in three construction trade committees, to analyze current policies and procedures concerning fire sprinkler, fire alarm, and fire suppression systems. The results of these committee's work were positive and several countywide polices were modified. The long term desire is to encourage participation and BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09- 10 26 16 11 Al cooperation between construction and enforcement agencies for developing sound consistent countywide policies and procedures. In 2008, the Existing Building Division developed the first customized fire warden program. This program involved several volunteer building appointees that would be responsible for insuring the safety of co-workers in their buildings in the event of a fire. This program encourages and educates citizens to take immediate action during an emergency, prior to the arrival of emergency services. In 2008, the Fire Prevention Bureau helped develop a county wide Juvenile Fire Setter program. The program is currently a team effort, among several of the county's Fire Districts working interdependently with representatives from mental health agencies, the health care community, local schools, local law enforcement, and social services. The goal of the program is to reduce the number of repeat fire setting by children. Currently, the Fire Prevention Bureau has one certified NFP A Juvenile Fire setter Intervention Specialist (JFIS) II, but has a goal to have four within the next 2 years. The Fire Prevention Bureau not only supports the NFP A Juvenile Fire setter program but is dedicated to improving it. An additional principle-centered training segment was added to the North Naples JFIS program to encourage the troubled teens to take responsibility for their choices, define their long and short term goals, and prioritize their time to accomplish them. In 2009, as a result of a change to NFPA 101 Life Safety Code, Chapter 12.7.6.1 and 13.7.6.1, the Fire Prevention Bureau developed and instituted a crowd management course for community businesses now required to provide an employee with such a designation. The change to the above referenced safety code decreased the number of people determining "an assembly" from 1,000 to 50, and instituted the requirement of a trained crowd manager for businesses housing such identified assemblies. This program has been highly successful among the businesses within the District, and has provided valuable training and certification to over four hundred employees of these entities regarding crowd management practices within the District. It is anticipated this number will continue to increase. It should be noted that this certification is effective for three years, at which time recertification will be BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 27 1611A.1 required. Fire Investigation: In the past five years, the Fire Prevention Bureau increased its number of State Certified Fire Investigators from three personnel to eight. By 2010, the goal is to increase the number of Florida State Certified Fire Investigators from eight to ten. Another goal that was set in 2005 was to purchase and fully equip a fire investigation trailer. In 2007, the Fire Prevention Bureau met another major accomplishment when they were able to purchase a new trailer, fully funded by community donations and grants. This unique Fire Investigation Mobile Unit is used for conducting both fire investigations and life safety public education. This unit was equipped and fully operational in December, 2008. The Engine Company Officer or Shift Commander is responsible for the investigation, and determination of the cause and origin, of all fires within the Fire District. When it is determined that a more in depth fire investigation is required, or the circumstances of the fire meet certain criteria, a Fire Investigator from the Fire Prevention Bureau responds and conducts an official investigation. In 2009, the Fire Investigation Division conducted twelve (12) official investigations either independently or supported of the State Fire Marshal's Office. As of July 31, 2010, a total of nine (9) official investigations have already been conducted. The Fire Investigators continue to expand their knowledge and make improvements in their report writing, scene documentation, witness interviewing, and forensic investigation techniques, and continue in their efforts to meet the goal of establishing the District's fire investigation program as a "model" for other Fire Districts. Other Programs: 1. The Public Information Officer (PIO) responds to major emergencies to provide on- scene public information to all areas of the news media, as well as videotaping and BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 28 16 11 A j 1 recording many major emergencies within the District for training and historical purposes. 2. The District's Assistant Chief of Administrative Services is also the Custodian of Public Records for the District as citizens may request information regarding the District from time to time. The role of the Custodian of Public Records is important since public access to District documents provides accountability to the taxpayers of the District and ensures honest government practices, as well as compliance with Florida Statute as to the provision of District records to the public. 3. The older population of North Naples is definitely a concern to the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District, and the District has responded by creating the Serving Our Seniors (SOS) Program. This program utilizes volunteers to deliver groceries to those residents of the District that are unable to shop for themselves, providing a much-needed service to these residents. Additionally, the weekly delivery by volunteers provides the opportunity to check on the well being of these residents. 4. Another program offered by this District is the sponsorship of Boy Scout Troop 2001, which is comprised of forty-three (43) Boy Scouts who proudly display high moral character and leadership skills. 5. Lastly there is the Community Emergency Response Team (C.E.R.T.), which is comprised of over six hundred (600) residents of North Naples that are trained to assist with disaster situations and recovery efforts within their communities. The individuals who participate in the Community Emergency Response Team program complete an eight (8) week training program. Support Staff In order to successfully function, the District requires support staff to provide the tools BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 29 16 11 A..l 4 necessary for the effective delivery of service. As with any other large organization, adequate supervision and administration is necessary to handle human resource issues, budgets, purchasing and supplies. Proper maintenance and repair of the stations and fleet keeps the infrastructure and rolling assets maintained and in service. Likewise, without adequate and up to date training of personnel, the quality of services delivered deteriorates. Finally, the ability to communicate incident responses and emergency assignments is a critical component of the successful provision of service. The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District employs approximately eighteen (18) administrative management and support positions. In simplest terms, the primary job of the Fire Chief and other administrative management and support staff is to make sure that firefighters have the ability and means to do their job on the emergency scene, manage fire district facilities and resources, and assure the organization operates within budget. Efficient administration and support is critical to the success of all internal and external customers within this fire district. With sufficient oversight, planning, documentation, training and maintenance, the operational sections of the department will pass any emergency test. Therefore, as with other parts of the District, administration requires resources to function properly. The addition of administrative support staff to any fire protection system should not cause a reduction of the emergency capacity of the fire district. Policy makers usually look for a balance in funding the administrative support and operational functions of the fire district. The administrative and support resources of each district should be just as adequate to ensure the high efficiency of emergency operations without detracting from the emergency mission. Administrative management personnel of North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District consist of one (1) Fire Chief, two (2) Assistant Chiefs, and four (4) Deputy Chief positions. The organizational design features a three-branch, top-down scheme, with the Fire Chief responsible for the direct oversight of these three branches of the District (see Attachment C). These branches include Administrative ServicesIFinancial, Emergency Operations, and Support Services. BJB/bb 8-24- 10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 30 16 , 1 I~ 1 As of October 1, 2010, there are one hundred forty-six (146) full-time budgeted positions, and five (5) elected officials in the District. These consist of one (1) Chief of the District, two (2) Assistant Chiefs, four (4) Deputy Fire Chiefs, one (1) Accounts PayablelReceivable Accountant, one (1) Human Resource Generalist, four (4) Administrative Assistants, one (1) Computer Network Administrator, one (1) Public Information Officer (PIO), one (1) Public Education Specialist (PES)IFire Inspector, one (1) Logistic Officer, one (1) maintenance worker, one (1) lead fleet technician, one (1) fleet technician, and one hundred twenty-six (126) firefighting and fire prevention personnel. We commonly look at the ratio of administrative support compared to the total positions of the fire district to gain a sense of the relative amount of resources that are committed to this important function. As stated earlier, the suitable balance of the two components (administrative and emergency personnel) is crucial to the success ofthe emergency mission of the District. A number of emergency workers sufficient to be realistically able to fight fire, effect rescue, and provide other emergency services at the expected level is fundamental to the delivery of fire protection. Increased statutory regulation, however, makes it even more crucial that proper documentation and oversight occurs. Of the one hundred forty-six personnel in the District, 12% of those persons function at the administrative support level. The proper ratio of administrative support and emergency positions is based on local needs and comparisons to similar local agencies. Support positions may be increased as funding allows keeping up with the growth of the District. Organizations with administrative to operational job ratios as low as 5 percent run the risk of insufficient support of operational membership and/or difficulty in meeting the many quasi- legal requirements of modern fire protection. Fire Departments that were found to be similar in nature to North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District usually have 10 to 15 percent of administrative support jobs within the system. In the next five (5) years, the North Naples Fire District should add the following six (6) new administrative and support positions: BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 31 16 , 1 A 1 1. One Accounting Assistant 2. One Computer Technician 3. One Data Entry Clerk 4. One Administrative Assistant 5. One Human Resource Director 6. One Controller These six (6) new positions would be an asset in the District and add to the overall accountability to the taxpayers of this District. However, due to the continued anticipated reduction in the District's property value and the accompanying decline in revenue, no administrative or support positions have been provided for in the Plan. Support Services Personnel at North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District will perform routine maintenance and repair of fire stations. More significant repairs are contracted out. North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District has hired a maintenance worker to maintain and repair the facilities within the District. The position of custodian, previously filled to provide the cleaning services to Administration Headquarters, Support Services Headquarters and the Training Centers, was eliminated due to budgetary constraints in the summer of2010. The Administration of Contract Services falls under the responsibility of Support Services, as does the Logistic Officer who handles the ordering of supplies and equipment, and maintains the fixed asset inventory. The Battalion Chief of Facilities works with tradesmen and vendors. These personnel add to the overall accountability of the District in day-to-day operations. Most repair work on apparatus will be conducted by the North Naples Maintenance Shop by certified Emergency Vehicle Technicians. Occasional major work such as replacement of transmissions, engines and overhauls are subcontracted out to specialty firms. Repair and maintenance activities are logged and tracked using computer software. The North Naples Maintenance Shop now employs one full time fleet mechanic and one full time fleet technician to meet the demands of maintaining District apparatus and vehicles. While the need for a third fleet technician exists during the course of the next five years, financial BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 32 16 , 1 ifl constraints prohibit the addition of this position. Trainin2: North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District has a four story training tower and live bum facility to train firefighters of this District, and other fire departments within the South Florida Area. The Training facility also hosts the North Naples Fire Training Academy which is recognized as a State Training Facility. Firefighter training at North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District is the responsibility of the Training Division. These individuals coordinate the delivery of training to all current members, as well as new recruits to the District. The Training Division Instructors educate firefighters in the most current and up-to-date procedures, tactics, and technical information in the fire service. In addition, the Training Officers act as District safety officers on the scene of emergencies. A significant amount of time and resources are allocated to training within the District which incorporates various programs, including special operations, hazardous materials and other advanced skills. Currently, the Training Division also assists in other support and logistics functions as deemed appropriate by the District. Ifthe District can reduce these support and logistics functions, the officers within this division can free up their time to educate and train firefighters. Training time is dedicated to basic skills retention, including practice of physical evolutions, multi-company drills and mutual aid coordinated training drills. Fire Officer Curriculum career advancement programs are available and delivered for future officers through the State College System. Additional five (5) year goals for the training department include recertifying and maintaining all EMTs and paramedics, and certifying all firefighters in wildland fire protection. Safety within the District The District has not yet conducted a full National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 33 1611Jil 1500 program compliance audit and has not established a compliance plan in accordance with the recommended methods listed in that document. At present the new procedures and techniques are evaluated, and decisions are made with compliance in mind. The District's goal is to work towards NFPA 1500 implementation. In 2006 the District adopted FFOSHA standards. Emer2:encv Dispatch A branch of the Collier County Sheriffs Office (CCSO) handles radio communications and emergency dispatch. The District operates on a truncated radio system capable of handling verbal and data signaling transmission. The primary repeater site for the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District is on Trade Center Way. This repeater is supplemented by additional sites on County Barn Road, W A VV Tower and EMS Station lOon Marco Island, intended to improve handheld communications. The Collier County Emergency Control Dispatch System (CCECDS) is capable of handling communications for all fire departments within Collier County at this time, but as the county population increases and the corresponding call load increases, attention will be needed for expansion of this service. This system is currently operating primarily on analog transmissions, but is being switched to a capability for combined analog and digital transmission trunking. Computer Aided Dispatching (CAD) is provided by the County, which is very stable and reliable for the communications efforts of the District. Information and data are currently shared between the CAD and the District's information management systems. This step has enabled the District to add computers to the vehicles for more effective communications. The communication center maintains a staff of one (1) supervisor and ten to fifteen (10-15) operators on duty with one operator dedicated to Control North. Certified Emergency Medical Dispatch personnel are employed on all shifts and caller medical aid is provided when appropriate. Improvement in the dispatch center staffing levels will be needed in the next five years as Control North and Collier Control are sometimes merged into one frequency to circumvent shortage of staff levels in the Dispatch Center. Quality assurance meetings with dispatching staff are conducted quarterly. BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 34 1611iil Special District Public Facilities Report 2010 (Florida General Statute 189.415) In compliance with General Statute 189.415, the following Public Facilities Report is published for the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District for the Year 2010. Below is a brief description of the next proposed facility (Station 48) of North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District. For the existing facilities please see the detailed Facility Record in Attachment E. Station 48 : The construction of Station 48 on the Livingston Road property was approved at the July 15, 2008 Board of Fire Commission Meeting. However, due to a significant reduction in the receipt of impact fees, the primary funding source for this project, Board direction was revised in 2009 to complete the permitting phase and proceed slowly with site preparation. The capacity of this building is thirty-eight parking spaces plus two handicap spaces, housing facilities for fourteen crew members, one physical fitness facility, three bays and a meeting room. The anticipated financial requirement for the design and construction of this facility is approximately $3,500,000. Initially, the funding source was planned to be impact fees. As stated above, due to the decrease in new development in the District, this source of revenue has significantly declined. To address this issue, an application for a federal grant for the construction of fire stations was submitted in July 2009. However, the District was not successful in receipt of the funds. Regardless of the funding source, the site preparation and construction of the facility will span three fiscal years, with an anticipating opening date in 2013, or year three of this Plan. Human Resources Mana2ement BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 35 16 11 A 1 In most municipal fire departments, certain support functions, such as budget or bookkeeping staff are shared with the City itself. The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District is an independent special taxing district, which means that this organization can share only a few resources with other area municipalities. While most fire departments benefit from the use of a municipal human resource manager, North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District conducts these activities within the organization. As staff numbers grow, so will the complexity of issues regarding compliance with state and federal regulations, health insurance, pensions, benefits packages, promotional packages, promotional processes, grievances and other employee related concerns. Often, the skills necessary to successfully manage these responsibilities require specific and advanced levels of training beyond mere orientation. Advanced human resource management as well as risk management will be necessary to successfully manage the responsibilities of a larger work force in the near future. The position of Human Resource Director has been identified as being needed in 20 II but has not been provided for in the five-year plan because oflack of financial resources. The position of Risk Management Director has not been addressed in this Five Year Plan, but should be given some consideration in the future Information Mana2ement and Technolo2V In light of the budgetary constraints facing the District over the next five years, the Information Management and Technology five year plan is focused on maintaining current technology and hardware systems. File servers are purchased with three year warranties that can be extended. The intent is to extend server warranties, with replacement after 5 years of service. Beyond five years of service, the probability of catastrophic failure and/or significant down time increases significantly. Additionally, over five years, processor speed and drive access speeds increase making replacement a necessity. Typically, server warranty extensions for a two year period are approximately $750.00 each. Replacement of two servers is provided for in the 2010-2011 budget year ($10,000.00) and one server in the 2011-2012 budget year ($5,000.00) is anticipated in the General Fund expenditures. The 2013-2014 budget year would see three server B1B/bb 8-24- 10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09- I 0 36 replacements ($15,000.00). 16 ,,,-. A 1 The only software upgrade anticipated would be a Microsoft Office upgrade. The District currently uses Office XP, which is a 2002 product. While serviceable, this software does need to be upgraded within the next two years. The current cost to upgrade is $18,000.00. At this time, no financial provision has been made for this software replacement. The District currently replaces desktop workstations at a rate of 15 per year. This should continue as it provides for obsolete computers to be replaced. Additionally, in the 2010-2011 budget year, provision has been made for the replacement of computers in the trucks. It should also be noted that no funding is available to provide for an additional full-time position of a data analyst. While it is recognized that this position should be filled within the next two fiscal years, no provision has been made because funding is not available. BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 37 OPERATIONAL PLAN SUMMARY Year 1 Budget Year 2010-2011 A. Ad Valorem; No New Employees From Designated Reserves: No Purchases - Reallocation Only B. 2010-2011 District Overview Overall Status 7 Stations 6 Engines 3 Ladder 1 Battalion Chief Staffing 1 Shift Training/Safety Officer Staffing Staffing 3 = 18 3 = 9 1 = 1 28 1 = 1 29 36 Per Shift 28 Per Shift Staffing 1 Shift Training/Safety Officer 7 off Per Shift, Kelly, Vacation, Personal, etc. o Reserve Personnel c. Impact Fee: Expenditures: Station #48 (Livingston) $1,010,000 Total Impact Fee Purch. $1,010,000 D. Placed in Financial Reserves: $-0- E. Designated & Undesignated Reserves (Cumulative) October 1,2010 Additions 2010-2011 Reallocation of Existing Designated Reserves Expenditures from Designated Reserves 2009-2010 Use of Reserves to Fund Operations 2009-2010 Balance - Designated Reserves September 30, 2011 Undesignated Reserves September 30, 2011 TOTAL Reserves (Designated & U ndesignated) at September 30, 2011 BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 38 161'1Al $12,813,759 $ -0- ($ 44,115) ($ -0- ) ($ 2.000.000) $ 10,769,644 $ -0- $ 10,769,644 16 11 A l 1 Year 2 Budget Year 2011-2012 A. Ad Valorem: No New Employees From Designated Reserves: Personal Protective Equipment Vehicle Replacements $ 20,000 $ 30.000 $ 50,000 B. 2011-2012 District Overview Overall Status 7 Stations 5 Engines 3 Ladder 1 Battalion Chief Staffing 1 Shift Training/Safety Officer Staffing Staffing 3 = 15 3 = 9 1 = 1 25 1 = 1 26 33 Per Shift 25 Per Shift Staffing 1 Shift Training/Safety Officer 7 off Per Shift, Kelly, Vacation, Personal, etc. o Reserve Personnel C. Impact Fee: Expenditures: Station #48 (Livingston) $ 500,000 Total Impact Fee Purch. $ 500,000 D. Placed in Financial Reserves: $-0- F. Designated & Undesignated Reserves (Cumulative) October 1,2011 Additions 2011-2012 Use of Reserves to Fund Operations 2011-2012 Expenditures from Designated Reserves 2011-2012 Balance - Designated Reserves September 30, 2012 Undesignated Reserves September 30,2012 TOTAL Reserves (Designated & Undesignated) at September 30, 2012 $10,769,644 $ -0- ($ 2,000,000) ($ 50.000) $ 8,719,644 $ -0- $ 8,719,644 BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 39 Year 3 16 I 1 AU 1 Budget Year 2012-2013 Open Station #48 A. Ad Valorem: No New Employees From Designated Reserves Replacement Vehicles Personal Protective Gear B. 2012-2013 District Overview Overall Status 8 Stations 5 Engines 3 Ladder I Battalion Chief Staffing 1 Shift Training/Safety Officer Staffing Staffing 33 Per Shift 25 Per Shift Staffing 1 Shift Training/Safety Officer 7 off Per Shift, Kelly, Vacation, Personal, etc. o Reserve Personnel C. Impact Fee: Expenditures: Station #48 (Livingston) Engine (St.48-Lease) Fire Equipment (St. 48) $ 30,000 $ 20.000 $ 50,000 3 = 15 3 = 9 1 = 1 25 1 = 1 26 $ 200,000 $ 75,000 $ 150,000 Total Impact Fee Purch. $ 425,000 D. Placed in Financial Reserves: $-0- G. Designated & Undesignated Reserves (Cumulative) October 1,2012 Additions 2012-2013 Use of Reserves to Fund Operations 2012-2013 Expenditures from Designated Reserves 2012-2013 Balance - Designated Reserves September 30, 2013 Undesignated Reserves September 30, 2013 B1B/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-]0 $ 8,719,644 $ -0- ($ 2,000,000) ($ 50.000) $ 6,669,644 $ -0- 40 TOTAL Reserves (Designated & Undesignated) at September 30, 2013 Year 4 Budget Year 2013-2014 A. Ad Valorem: No New Employees From Designated Reserves Replacement Engine (Lease) Replacement Vehic1es Personal Protective Gear $ 75,000 $ 30,000 $ 20.000 $125,000 B. 2013-2014 District Overview Overall Status 8 Stations 5 Engines 3 Ladder 1 Battalion Chief Staffing 1 Shift Training/Safety Officer Staffing Staffing 3 = 15 3 = 9 1 = 1 25 1 = 1 26 33 Per Shift 25 Per Shift Staffing 1 Shift Training/Safety Officer 7 off Per Shift, Kelly, Vacation, Personal, etc. o Reserve Personnel C. Impact Fee: Expenditures: Station #48 (Livingston) Eng./Ladder Truck (Lease) Fire & St. Equip. (St. #48) Total Impact Fee Purch. $ 400,000 $ 75,000 $ 60.000 $ 535,000 D. Placed in Financial Reserves: $-0- H. Designated & Undesignated Reserves (Cumulative) October 1,2013 Additions 2013 - 2014 Use of Reserves to Fund Operations 2013-2014 Expenditures from Designated Reserves 2013-2014 Balance - Designated Reserves September 30, 2014 Undesignated Reserves September 30,2014 TOTAL Reserves (Designated & Undesignated) BJB/bb 8-24-10 41 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 16 I 1 A 1 1# $ 6,669,644 $ 6,669,644 $ -0- ($ 2,000,000) ($ 125.000) $ 4,541,644 $ -0- at September 30,2014 Year 5 Budget Year 2014-2015 A. Ad Valorem: No New Employees From Designated Reserves Replacement Vehicles Replacement Engine (Lease) Personal Protective Gear $ 30,000 $ 75,000 $ 20.000 $125,000 B. 2014-2015 District Overview Overall Status 8 Stations 5 Engines 3 Ladder 1 Battalion Chief Staffing 1 Shift Training/Safety Officer Staffing Staffing 3 = 15 3 = 9 1 = 1 25 1 = 1 26 33 Per Shift 25 Per Shift Staffing 1 Shift Training/Safety Officer 7 off Per Shift, Kelly, Vacation, Personal, etc. o Reserve Personnel c. Impact Fee: Expenditures: Station #48 (Nursery Ln) Engine 48 (Lease) $ 400,000 $ 75.000 Total Impact Fee Purch. $ 475,000 D. Placed in Financial Reserves: $-0- I. Designated & Undesignated Reserves (Cumulative) October 1,2014 Additions 2014-2015 Use of Reserves to Fund Operations 2014-2015 Expenditures from Designated Reserves 2014-2015 Balance - Designated Reserves September 30, 2015 Undesignated Reserves September 30,2015 TOTAL Reserves (Designated & Undesignated) BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 42 16 j 1 A, 1 1 $ 4,541,644 $ 4,541,644 $ -0- ($ 2,000,000) ($ 125.000) $ 2,416,644 $ -0- 16 J 1 A 1 at September 30,2015 $ 2,416,644 BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 43 16Jfl Al Goals in the Next Five Years While financial goals have been identified below, limited availability of funds dramatically impact the ability to meet these goals. However, they have been stated as identified even though the financial ability is lacking. During Year 1 (FY 2010-2011) the District should replace identified staffvehicles. However, adequate financial provisions do not exist. During Year 2 (FY 2011-2012) the District should replace identified staff vehicles and Engine 40 from the general fund reserves. No financial provision is identified due to lack of adequate funding, other than the purchase of one vehicle from designated reserves During Year 3 (FY 2012-2013) the District should replace identified staff vehicles and Ladder 40 from the general fund reserves. However, funding is only available for one vehicle replacement. During Year 4 (FY 2013-2014) the District should replace identified staff vehicles from the general fund reserves. Only provision for one replacement vehicle is identified due to financial constraints. During Year 5 (FY 2014-2015) the District should replace identified staff vehicles from the general fund reserves. Only provision for one replacement vehicle is identified due to financial constraints. The need to add three new Battalion Chief positions in this year has been identified; however, due to financial constraints, no such provision has been made. A schedule for station maintenance has been developed by staff. Adhering to this schedule will keep the buildings in good condition. General funds are presently being utilized to accomplish minimum maintenance as needed. Provisions to address scheduled building maintenance as funding is available are identified in this proposed five-year plan. BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 44 16 I 1 Al t Firefighting and rescue equipment carried on apparatus should also be replaced as warranted. General funds are presently being utilized for these items. Provisions to address scheduled replacement are in this proposed five-year plan as funding allows. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is set up on a replacement schedule and the funding is also established in the general fund reserves of this plan. The following Capital Improvement Program supports the goals of the Five Year Plan within the existing and anticipated financial constraints. Capital Improvements Pro2ram The North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is a comprehensive listing of assets owned by the District coupled with the condition and future plans for those assets. The Capital Improvements Program budgetary process encompasses the integration of revenues and expenditures, along with program policy issues included in the District's long range planning process. The program's goals and objectives are as follows: 1. Increase efficiency of the District's operations by maintaining assets in acceptable condition. 2. Recommend an annual level of combined expenditures for capital, major maintenance and equipment replacement. 3. Identify assets no longer useful to the District and assess the salvage/recoverable value of said assets, if any. 4. Reduce utility and maintenance costs by identifying improvements that will result in annual cost savings. 5. Suggest a long term plan for each asset. 6. Identify a plan for proposed maintenance and replacement of existing assets and acquisition of new assets which is based on a reasonable expectation of what the District can afford. 7. Perform annual physical inventory of District's fixed assets to ensure sufficient asset tracking, update the asset inventory and re-assess long-term plans for replacement of current assets and acquisition of new assets. BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 45 16 11 ;A 1 1 Program Summary The anticipated reduction in both General Fund and Impact Fee Fund revenue has a significant impact on the funding of the Capital Improvement Program. As a result of the decrease in anticipated available funds for the purchase of capital items, the funding provisions for the Capital Improvements Program for fiscal years 2010-2015 have been drastically reduced to provide for only absolutely essential items, and are summarized below (Ad Valorem and Impact): 1. Capital V ehic1e/ Apparatus................................. $495,000 2. Capital Equipment........ ..................................... $210,000 3. Personal Protective Equipment........................ $80,000 4. Public Buildings/Land Use ............................. $2,500,000 Total Cap ita) ............... .................................................... ..... $3,285,000 Elements of the Pro2ram The Capital Improvements Program integrates the Public Buildings/Land Use Program, Capital Equipment Program (CEP), Capital Vehicle Program (CVP), major maintenance projects, and new personnel expenditures that may accompany said projects. Associated with the latter categories will be the revenue streams required to fund the aforementioned projects into an overall financial management plan. Pursuant to Section 191.013, Florida Statutes, the District is required to submit a plan that identifies the facilities, equipment, personnel, and revenue needed within the next five-year period. This plan should be submitted to Collier County pursuant to section 189.415, Florida Statutes. Section 189.415(2), Florida Statutes, states the District". . . is required to submit a plan every five years, at least twelve months prior to Collier County's evaluation and appraisal report submission date. In addition to submitting a plan every five (5) years, the District is required to send an annual update stating any changes that were made to the five-year plan" (Lewis, Longman, & Walker, P.A., Memo: Nov. 20, 2002). The plan should address the following areas: >> Existing public facilities including capacity and current demands. >> Description of facilities being built, improved or expanded over the next five (5) years, including financing and completion dates. BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 46 16 J 1 Al f >> Description of facilities proposed to be built, improved or expanded within the next five (5) years, including financing and completion dates. Pro2ram Calendar for Each Upcomin2 Year April-June District prepares and revises five-year plan July Program integrated into annual budget preparations August or September Program presented to Commissioners Program revised and adopted and incorporated in the budget in accordance with public hearing review Definitions The terms delineated below are used to distinguish types of assets: Capital Improvement- new construction, acquisition of assets and one-time projects which have a value greater than $50,000 and an expected life longer than one year, and are not vehicles or equipment. EQuipment- assets used in an operation or activity with a cost greater than $1,000, an expected life longer than one (1) year, and are not vehicles, including, but not limited to, equipment for stations, apparatus, and administrative headquarters. VehicIes- assets generally described as vehicles and emergency apparatus that have an expected life greater than one (1) year and cost more than $1,000. On-e:oine: Maintenance- regular maintenance performed on at least an annual basis that should be included in departmental operating budgets. Limits of the Pro2ram The Program includes projected asset replacement, acquisition, and maintenance expenses related to the District assets for the period FY 2010-2015. The program addresses projected asset needs while still operating within projected financial constraints. The District staff makes every effort to develop reasonable, educated estimates of the priority asset expenditure needs. The aforementioned projects are important to the District and need to proceed. In the event of a deterioration of the economy, the District must be prepared to re-adjust the scheduling of projects BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 47 16 11 ~l within the five-year plan in recognition of changing financial realities. PROPERTY OWNED AND LAND ACQUISTIONS FACILITIES The District currently owns eight (8) separate facilities, one (1) boat slip and several parcels of vacant land purchased for future use. The locations are as follows: 1. Station #40. 1441 Pine Ridge Road, which is a three (3) bay station that houses one (1) engine, 1 ladder, fire suppression personnel, one (1) boat and leases 1 bay to Collier EMS ambulance and personnel. 2. Station #42.7010 Immokalee Road, which is currently a three bay station that houses 1 engine, one (1) brush truck and fire suppression personnel. Collier EMS ambulance and personnel use one (1) bay. 3. Station #43. 16325 Vanderbilt Drive, which is a three (3) bay station that houses one (1) reserve engine, (1) ladder, one (1) boat, one (1) utility truck and fire suppression personnel. One (1) bay is leased to Collier EMS ambulance and personnel. 4. The District owns .8 acres on 9th street in Bonita Shores. This vacant lot is adjacent to Station 43. This property is held for future use. 5. Station #44.8970 Hammock Oak Dr, which is a four (4) bay station that houses one (1) engine, one (1) ladder, one (1) SRU, one (1) brush truck, one (1) Beach Patrol, one (1) boat, one (1) utility truck and fire suppression personnel. 6. Station #45. 1885 Veterans Park Drive, which is a three (3) bay station with training room and training tower that houses one (1) engine, one (1) reserve engine, one (1) Battalion Chief, four (4) SRU vehicles, four (4) SRU trailers, one (1) training engine, special team equipment, fire suppression, training, and administrative personnel. 7. Station #46. 3410 Pine Ridge Road, which is a two (2) bay station that houses one (1) engine, one (1) reserve ladder, one (1) brush truck, fire suppression personnel, two (2) hurricane trailers and leases one (1) bay to Collier EMS ambulance and personnel. 8. Station #47. Jointly owned by NNFD, East Naples Fire District and Collier County EMS, this facitlity is a three (3) bay station that houses one (1) engine for NNFD, one (1) engine for ENFD and one (1) medic unit. 9. Station #48. The District owns a 3.28 site on Livingston Road, north oflmmokalee Road. This property is in the final stages of permitting. Station design has been completed and approved by the Board. Submission ofa federal grant application was made in July of2009, the outcome of which his anticipated in December of2009. Until such decision regarding the receipt of grant funds is received, site clearing cannot proceed. BlB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 48 16 J 1 ~ 1 f 10. Station 49. The District owns 26.35 acres on Nursery lane. This is a potential future station site; however, due to the significant decrease in impact fee revenue, the project has been put on hold until funding sources can be identified. 11. Station 410. The District owns 3.66 acres on Oakes Boulevard. This is a potential future station site; however, due to the significant decrease in impact fee revenue, the project has been put on hold until funding sources can be identified. 12. Station 411. The District owns 1.6 acres on Sun Century Road. This is a potential future station or storage site however this project is on hold due to tax reform. 13. The District has completed the renovations of the commercial building on Taylor Road, which is the location of the District's Support Services, housing the vehicle and apparatus maintenance facility, Fire Prevention, logistics, and ware house facilities with 18 staff (including Fire Marshal, Deputy Fire Marshals and Fire Inspectors) and one (1) SRU. 14. Boat Slip located at Marina Bay Club, 13105 Vanderbilt Drive, slip #47 150 The District owns 1.01 acres of vacant property at the south end of Center Lane. This property could be sold or used for mitigation credits. 16. The District owns two (2) vacant lots on Kathleen Court totaling 1.31 acres. These lots are potential future station sites however these projects are on hold due to tax reform. 17. The District own 1.78 acres on Pine Ridge Road, the currently vacant lot is a potential future station site however this project is on hold due to tax reform. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS The financial projections contained in this Plan are segregated by two (2) of the three (3) District funds: the General Fund and the Impact Fee Fund. The third fund, the Inspection Fee Fund, was created in January of 2003 in accordance with Collier County Resolution 01-313. While the Inspection Fee Fund can purchase "equipment relating to the field of construction inspection expenses" (CC. Resolution 01- 313), due to the relatively short length of time the fund has been in existence, and the apparent downward trend in revenue receipts, the purchase of capital items from the Inspection Fee Fund has not been included in the Five Year Plan projections. General Fund: BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 49 16 I 1 A 1 The major source of revenue for the General Fund is ad valorem taxes. Historically, projections for ad valorem revenue have been based on an analysis of receipts for the previous ten (10) years. However, recent declines in property value, and the anticipated continued declines in value, and the resulting decrease in revenue have rendered historic projection methods inaccurate. For year one of the Plan (2010- 2011), information provided by the Collier County Tax Appraiser has been utilized (which reflects a 9% decrease in the appraised property value of the District). Year 2 of the plan reflects a five percent (5%) decrease in property tax revenue, Year 3 reflects no change in property value and associated revenue, and years four and five reflect a three percent (3%) increase in property tax revenue per year. This income projection is based on the District receiving 95% of projected ad valorem revenue. The projection for other revenue is derived from an average amount of other income received over the last five (5) years. Expenditure projections for the General Fund are based on proposed budgetary expenditures for year 1 of the plan (2010-2011), and adjusting costs to reflect a maximum of $2,000,000 per fiscal offunding from reserve funds. Impact Fee Fund: The major source of revenue for the Impact Fee Fund is Impact Fees collected for new construction occurring in the District. Income projections for future years have been estimated to reflect the significant decrease in revenue received during the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 fiscal years. In January of2006, the District, along with the other independent fire districts in Collier County, received a study on impact fee rates prepared by an independent consultant. Contained within that study was the recommendation for the District to increase the impact fee rates to $.28 per square foot for residential structures and $.99 per square foot for commercial structures. Duet to the continued increases in the cost of land and construction to build stations to provide service to the new growth in the District, the Board approved the revised impact fee schedule effective October 1, 2006. Projections for impact fee revenue are conservative, with projections reflecting actual receipts to date during the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 fiscal years, with only a moderate increase in revenue projected for BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 50 years 3 through 5 of the Plan. 16 '1 A~ J Expenditures from the Impact Fee Fund are regulated by state statute and must meet the following criteria: 1. Expenditure must be a Capital Asset (minimum life in excess of one (1) year and the cost must exceed $1,000, although grouping is permitted). 2. The purchase of the asset must be due to growth in the District. The projected expenditures therefore represent anticipated capital items which the District will require due to the growth in the District. Where appropriate, the expenditure has been apportioned by percentage between the General Fund and the Impact Fee Fund. Because ofthe limited impact fee revenue available, only moderate provisions for the completion of Station 48 through debt service, the purchase of equipment necessary to operate that station and the debt service payment for an engine lease for this new facility are identified. It is essential that this Plan be reviewed on an annual basis to identify any upward or downward trends in income and expenses for both the Impact Fee Fund and the General Fund. BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 51 ... .... - i ''7 lbllItl 1 Percentages of General and Impact Fee Fund Expenditures 1% 0% 1% 0% 14% •Land •Vehicles&App. I7 Equipment •St.lmpr. •Operating Expenses •Personnel 84% Total General and Impact Fund Expeditures $26,000,000 $25,500,000 $25,000,000 ' $24,500,000 .. } $24,000,000u' 4 $23.500,000 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Ili Total General and Impact Fund Expeditures $25,567,000 $24,328,299 $24,253,299 $25,064,648 $25,643,697 BJB/bb 8-24-10 52 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 16 1'1 AJ PROJECTED REVENUE AND CAPITAL EXPENSES-SUMMARY-GENERAL FUND Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 GENERAL FUND Revenue Per Budget 5% Decrease No Change 3% Increase 3% Increase Budgeted/Projected Ad Valorem $ 21,871,894 $ 20,778,299 $ 20,778,299 $ 21,401,648 $ 22,043,697 $ $ Additional Ad Valorem Over 95% - $ - $ - $ - - Budgeted/Projected Other $ S $ s Revenue 640 991 1 000 000 $ 1 000 000 1,000 000 1 000 000 Total BudgetedlProjected Revenue $ 22,512,885 $ 21,778,299 $ 21,778,299 $ 22,401,648 $ 23,043.697 Exoenditures Per BudQet $2 Million Cap on Reserve Used to Fund Expenses Budgeted/Projected Expense $ 24,557,000 $ 23,778,299 $ 23,778,299 $ 24,404,648 $ 25,043,697 Proj. Exp. AdjustmenV5 Yr. Plan .1 Additions S - S - S - S - - Total Projected Expenditures $ 24,557,000 $ 23,778,299 $ 23,778,299 $ 24,404,648 $ 25,043,697 Additions (Deletions) to Desianated Reserves Apparatus Replacement (Engine Lease) $ - $ - $ - $ (75,000) $ (75,000) $ Equipment $ - $ - $ - $ - - Station $ Maintenancellmprovements $ - $ - $ - $ - - Personal Protective Eq. $ - $ (20,000) $ (20,000) $ (20,000) $ (20,000) Creation of New Designated $ Reserves $ - $ - $ - $ - - Vehicles S - S {30 oom S (30 oom S {3000m S (30 oom Total Additions to Designated Reserves $ - $ (50,000) $ (50,000) $ (125,ooo) $ (125000) SUMMARY-GEN. FUND Cash Reserves - October 1 $ 12,813,759 $ 10,769,644 $ 8,719,644 $ 6,669,644 $ 4,541,644 Proiected Revenue $ 22,512,885 $ 21,778,299 $ 21,778,299 $ 22,401,648 $ 23,043,697 Projected Expenditures $ (24,557,000) $ (23,778,299) $ (23,778,299) $ (24,404,648) $ (25,043,697) DeSignated Reserve Exoenses $ - $ (5000m $ {5000m $ (12500m $ (12500m Total Cash Reserves $ 10,769,644 $ 8,719,644 $ 6,669,644 $ 4,541,644 $ 2,416,644 Percentage - Total Reserve 430k 36% 28% 18% 9% BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 53 16 11 A1 , NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT SUMMARY OF 5 YEAR PLAN - GENERAL FUND Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 PERSONNEL ADDITIONS Firefiahters 0 0 0 0 0 Battalion Commanders 0 0 0 0 0 EMS Coordinator 0 0 0 0 0 Fire Inspectors 0 0 0 0 0 Assistant Chief 0 0 0 0 0 Accountina Assistant 0 0 0 0 0 Data Entry Clerk 0 0 0 0 0 Computer Technician 0 0 0 0 0 Human Resource Director 0 0 0 0 0 Controller 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ADDITIONS-PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0 0 No New Positions Between 2010 and 2015 APPARATUS & EQUIPMENT-Reserve EXDenses Replacement Engine - Replacement of Fire Apparatus Lease Replacement/Purchase Fire Equip. Budaet Budget Budget Budaet Budaet Replacement of Fire Equipment Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Personal Protective Equipment Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget BUILDINGS/LAND/ST A TION IMPROVEMENTS Station Improvements Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Stations #40 and #46 Improvements Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Total Reserves at Fiscal Year End $10,769,644 $8,719,644 $6,669,644 $ 4,541,644 $2,416.644 Percentaae of Reserves to Expenditures 43% 36% 28% 18% 9% BlB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 54 0 ~ I 0 I I I I . 0 0 I I 0 0 ~ I 3 ~ I I I I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 I"- 0 0 0 0) 0 CD CD I"- 0 0 0 G) N 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 oj en G) ~ It) 0 .0 ci () .... 0 C") It) 0) CD N CD .... .... () .... C") It) N C") e: 0 It) CD N ..-- I"- .... e: 0 C") N l"- N 05 N III - CD ..-- CO III - C") ii 0 ii 0 m C") m C") - - en en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CO 6 6 co . co 6 6 6 - - e: It) 0 0 It) II) e: 0 0 0 .~ N N 0 0 N N .~ ~ 0 0 0 .... ..-- 0 0 ..-- .... .... C") It) 0 en 0 CD ~ ..-- .... en 0 0 t: It) N ~ ~ :'! ~ III N 0 ~ G) . G) . ~ ~ .... ~ C") .... .... G) 0 G) 0 It) N III N G) G) ~ ~ ~ ~ Ell ~ ~ 44 ~ ~ ~ Ell ~ . I I 0 I ~ I ~ "0 0 "0 It) S 0 0 ~ It) s G) I"- 0 0 I"- .... G) ~ III ~ III () co 0 0 co co () G) ~ C") N co C") C") G) ~ It) co ..-- CD ~ III G) ii := G) ii ~ G) :s !: ~ G) 0:: Ell Ell 0:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 44 0 0 ~ 0 I I 0 0 I . . I ~ . . 0 . I I 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 3 3 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 I"- 0 q 0) U!. ~ I"- 0 0 0 G) .... 0 0 co 0 0 0 G) C") co 0 ci ci () .... 0 0 C") It) CD N en en () .... C") It) 0 e: 0 It) 0 co N ..-- CD CD e: 0 C") N co CD III N .... .... III N - CD N ..-- 0 0 It) ii 0 0 ii In C") .... .... In C") - - en en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tF. ~ ~ ~ ill 44 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 I . 0 0 I ~ I 3 - co ~ 6' 0 0 0 0 0 ~ e: ~ 0 0 0 I"- 0 0 0) CD CD 8 It) I"- 0 It) .... C") N G) .... 0 0 co 0 0 0 0) en .... co 0 ~ 0 0 0 C") It) CD N CD CD en 0 ..-- C") ~ N It) 0 co N ..-- I"- r:: III N CD CD G) . N ..-- 0 G) I ~ 0 CD 0 N :s It) ..-- .... ~ G) .... .... ~ 0 G) 0 N III N G) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ell ~ Ell ~ 0:: ~ ~ ~ () 6' N 6' r:: I It) I ii) 6' 0 ~ N "0 0 It) 0 0 C") ..-- .... III S 0 ~ ii 0 0) 0 0 ..-- .... G) 0 0 G) 0 It) 0 0 ~ 3 ~ III 0 0 ~ 0 ..-- 0 CD ~ () 0 0 G) co G) ~ co It) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ III ~ G) e: :s ~ ~ G) ii ~ -~ ~ G) ~ en ~ ~ ~ ~ Ell ~ Ell 44 ~ ~ 0 0 N 0 I 0 l"- I I 0 I I I I en 0 ~ . 0 I I I I 0 0 0 N 0 0 C") 0 0 0) II) 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 It) .... - 0 I"- 0 0 "0 0 0) I"- III N ci S .... 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 C") C") III .... 0 co 0 0 0 0 N It) 0 CD CD N ..-- .... G) 0 0 C") It) 0) () It) ~ 0 N It) 0) ..-- co ~ It) CD N .~ N co_ N - CD C") ..-- N - CD ..-- e 0 N .... G) 0 C") ..-- III C") Q. - G) en en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ell ~ Ell 44 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U) .... III Q) III Q) It) :> a:: U) U) Q) III :> a:: G) 0 .... U) 'E U) C> Q) 0 .... III 'E ~ ~ Q) Q) 'E Ql 'E ~ ~ Q) Q) > 2: Q) - e: Q) Q) "0 > 2: Q) Q) t) 0 9 E Q) c: "0 E > Ql Q) U 0 ~ E It) Q) E Q) n - It) Ql Q) 0 9 x 'E U) Ql Q) ~ Q) ~Gi It) Q) 0 9 x 'E U) Q) ~ Ql Q) U) (J Ql E > Q) "0 ~ 0:: Q) Q) U) (J q x Q) a:: .a "0 III (J .9 0 (5 01> Gl 9 x Q) a:: .a "0 III W ...: E c: "9 III 9 - w ...: E c: ~ "0 X >- i:) III "~ ~ .... "iij +:: "0 x >- (; ~ S W ...: .9 ! ~ Q) 0. c.. Q).!!! III G) Q) W ...: .9 ~ Q) g LL a:: Q) c.. E e: It) - g ~ LL a:: III ...: >- -~ It) c: g W .... Iii e ~ .~ Gl III ...: >- .~ It) e: ~ ~ a:: ~ ~ g e: 0 ~ .~ Q) Iii Q) CD c: . E III ~ e: 0 ~ .~ Ql .2 w co <( 32 :-Q <( '9 iii ~ 0 - E Q) S .~ w co .... <( 32 u - ..Q en Q) co III U) iii ..Q C/) Q) :c It) .~ "0 en Q) ..c: .... .fI ~ "0 III "0 en ~ Q) ~ (5 ...J <( E .... ':; Q) () III U) u5 Q) ~~ e: 0 Q) .... ~ (5 ...J <( E ':; ~ e LL co LL <( C> w u: co > en () i:S c.. ::::> l- e u: co LL <( C> w u: co 16 M Ail I 10 10 o g; 0- u u.. o co 0>- -co -1-0 <;lUJ 00> .1:>0 ,ec.:: coo.. -,0.. co-< 16 f1 ..... a I I a a ~ I . ~ a a a a Ol a CD CD a a a ..... ..... co N N .... ~ ~ II) ..f .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 0 I 0 a 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 co co ~ N N :, ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ 0 I . 0 0 ~ , I ~ .... I I 0 , , . 0 I , 0 I 0 , ! ~ a 0 0 .... 0 0 0 0 0 Ol 0 CD CD ,.... 0 0 0 Ol 0 0 0 0) en CI) II) to 0 0 0 0 CD .... CD CD U ..... to to N CD co N 0 C') co ..... ..... ~ CD CD t:: N C') N co ~ '!: '!: CD CD III 0 Iii ~ N N CO') OJ - en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4It EI} (F. ~ EI) EI} EI} EI} EI} EI} EI} EI} EI} EI} EI} EI} EI} ~ ~ - . ~ 0 , 0 .... 6 6 6 6 0 Ig 0 0 t:: 0 0 0 8 0 g ':! ~ II) 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 (/) ..... 0 to 0 0 II) II) II) II) 0 0 ~ N N ~ 0 0 UI N 0 t:: ~ ..... ..... CI) . ~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ I~ ..... CI) 0 UI N CI) ~ ~ ~ (F. ~ 0::: ~ ~ EI) (F. - - I I I I . . '0 UI CI) CI) .... ~ III U CI) .2 UI CI) Iii 0::: CI) 0::: ~ ~ ~ tilt - ~ 0 . . 0 ~ I ~ .... I I 0 I I I I 0 I I 0 0 I ! 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 Ol 8 CD CD .... ,.... 0 0 0 0 Ol 0 III .... 0 0 0 0 g en en UI ..... to 0 to 0 0 0 0 ..... ..... co N ..... ..... CI) 0 C') to N C') co N N ~ ~ ~ ,.... ~ ~ N C') N ,.... ~ tIS co CI) 0 C') .... .... UI CO') CI) en 0::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EI} ~ ~ EI} EI} EI} ~ tilt ~ - Ci; <Il .... Q) III <Il <Il Q) UI :> a:: <Il Q) <Il C> CI) 0 Q) <Il C <Il <Il C> C Q) C ~ z Q) C Q) C .- t:: Q) Q) '0 I > c: Q) .. t:: Q) CI) '0 Q) t:: 'l:l E > Gl CI) t5 0 9 E Q) t:: 'l:l E > S E ~ ~ .... UI Q) E CI) ~ CI) CI) :!Qi . CI) 0 9 x C <Il Q) Q) ~ Q) :!. ~ Gl E ~ > CI) '0 ~ 0::: Q) Q) <Il () Q) E > Q) '0 0 .9 0 e m> .! 9 x Q) a:: ::J 'l:l III 0 .9 0 (5 0)> .! III Gl g .iii~ '0 W ...: E ro t:: "9 III Q) 9 -+:I g .~ .... III CD X >- [; ::J "2 .~ a: a: ~-3 III CD a.. E a.. (1).!!! t:: . .! w >= g .9 .... u... Q) E t:: i Q) w Iii C ::J .~ CD III ...: .~ to C ~ a:: Q) w Iii .~ a:: .... g a:: .... CI) . E 0::: t:: a .... ~ Q) Q) . E Iii co t:: UI ~ .~ ~ co t:: UI <( ~ Cii ~ 0 - E CI) S .~ w CD .... <( '5 (3 <( Cii ~ 0 -E Gl ~ CD III <Il J!~ '0 UI Cii g C/) C/) Q) CD '9 III <Il ~~ '0 .... 'l:l ~ .s::. () III .!!! u5 CI) ~~ t:: 0 CI) .... ::J 0 -l <( E 'S Q) () C1l <Il u5 Q) t:: C/) () 0 a.. :) l- e u::: CD u... <( C> w u::: CD > C/) () 0 a.. I-~ :) <0 It) o $ 0-. U u.. o cc 0>- -cc ~Cl <"';lUJ 00> .nO .eo:: ccc.. -,c.. cc<: 16 11A 1 ...... LO o ~ 0-. U "'- o c:l 0>- "";'c:l ""'0 <';lUJ 00> .00 .eo:: c:lc.. .....c.. c:l<: 16 '1 ~ , IMPACT FEE FUND PROJECTED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEARS 2010 - 2015-IMPACT FEE FUND Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 TOTAL IMPACT FEE FUND Buildinosl Land Use Station 48 (Livinaston Rd.) $1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 200,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 2,500,000 Station 49 - Nurserv/Heritaae $ - $ - $ - Station 410 (Oaks) $ - Station 411 (Wiaains Pass Area) $ - Total-Bldas.lLand Use-IMPACT $1,000,000 $500,000 $200,000 $400,000 $400,000 $ 2,500,000 COLLECTION FEES-EXPENSE 10,000 Vehicle/Annaratus Renlacement Enaine/Ladder - St. 48 (Lease) $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 225,000 Total-Vehicle/ApPo-IMPACT $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 225,000 Eouioment Fire Eauioment $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 60,000 $ 210,000 Personal Protective Equip. $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total-EauiDment-IMPACT $0 $0 $150,000 $60,000 $0 $ 210,000 TOTAL PURCHASES-IMPACT $1,010,000 $ 500.000 $ 425,000 $ 535,000 $ 475,000 $ 2.935.000 BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 58 16 11 A 1 IMPACT FEE FUND PROJECTED REVENUE AND CAPITAL EXPENSES-SUM MARY-IMPACT FEE FUND Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 IMPACT FEE FUND Revenue ProiectedlmpactFees $450,000 $450,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 Other Revenue $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Deferred Revenue (Impact Fees $603.217 $ $3.217 $83217 ~113 217 received but not vet spent) 480217 ImDact Fees Available $ 1,058,217 $ 503,217 $ 508,217 $ 588,217 $ 618,217 SUMMARY-IMPACT FEE FUND Impact Fees Available $ 1,058,217 $ 503,217 $ 508,217 $ 588,217 $ 618,217 Projected Expenditures Per 5 Yr. Plan (and Budget for 10-11 $ (1 010000\ $ (500000\ $ (425000\ $ (475 000) $ (515000) Year) Impact Fees Available at Fiscal Year End $ 48.217 $ 3,217 $ 83,217 $ 113,217 $ 103.217 NOTE: PROJECTED EXPENDITURES REFLECT ONLY THOSE INDICATED IN 5 YEAR PLAN BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 59 c Z ::J LL ..J ~ W Z W C) I II) .... o N I o .... o N t/) a::: <C W >- ..J <C o t/) u:: a::: o LL t/) W ~ ::J I-- e z W D. >< W ..J ~ n: <C o C W I-- o W .., o ~ D. .... ....0 :;N CDW >->- LL CD ... ~'-~ :0'0 CD ::J a::: m II) 11)0 :;N CDW >->- LL "'It "'It.... ,-0 caN CDW >->- LL M MO :;N CDW >->- LL N N.... ,-0 caN CDW >->- LL I I I I I ..J ~ o I-- ~~~~~ co """ ... en C ~ o C o :;::; U ::J L- in C o o c o U ::J L- - If) C o o ~ ... ... ... ... (,,) (,,) (,,) (,,) ~ ~ ~ ~ .sE.s.s ~ z ~ en~ ~ ~I CDC~ c.: I/)OQ) If)::J ::J t) 9 en .~ '0 C'Cg<<l~~C Z C C ~ <<l .~ ca ::J ca 'S Q) 2 s: ~ LL ..J12 E 0 '- en ~~COO"l~~.g ~c"""""" """in W._cccc I Z '0 .Q .Q 0 .Q ftj w3roro~roo C)mcncncncnl-- 000 000 000 000 NII)t-- ........N ~~~ 000 000 000 OL.()II) ("1)"0 .... ~ ~~ 000 000 oo~ OL.()II) ("1)"0 .... ~ ~~ o o o o ("I) ~ 010 o 0 o ~ o 0 ("I) M ~ ~~ I I ~~ CD CD ~ ~ CD CD I/) I/) CD CD ~~ ... C CD ~ Q) ~ If) '? mz CD 2W ~-_C) C C I I/) Q) 8 ::J E Q) 1aQ)~<C '-uu- ~..!l!<<l.!! '1 g Q .~ ~o::&ii .!! Q) Q) > o~ :-Q .~ ii .c..cg... CD Q) C 0 >>WI-- 00 00 00 00 co co ~ "0 ::J al~~ 00 00 0C?- ~oo ..:::NN "0 ::J al~~ 00 00 o~ 00 ~NN "0 ::J al~~ o o o o M 00 00 00 -00 ~NN -c ::J al~~ ~ 00 00 00 _00 Q)NN .g ::J al~~ ~~ "0 "0 ::J ::J alal~ ... CD ! ~ -5' : ::J CD m~ - C Q) ... E 5; .9 E .~ .s W -~ .~ wu.. .9 ::Jz Sw Q)C) >~ :;::; C u CD ~ -~ 0. .S ro.ff C I 0- If) ca L- ... Q) 0 0.1-- ~~ "0 "0 ::J ::J alal ~~ "0 "0 ::J ::J alal ~~ "0 "0 ::J ::J alal ~~ -c -c ::J ::J alal ~~ "0"0 ::J ::J alal ~~ "0 "0 ::J ::J alal ... ... ~~ 'O'C ::J ::J mm I/) ... C CD If) E L- CD ~ ~ ~ CD 0 ~o::~ EOcn -;L- 5 ._Q o~ .. ca <<l Ci)cn<i: 16 J 111.~' o o o o 10 f') ~ ~ o o ~ 10 N .... ~ ~ o o ~ 10 N .... ~ ~ o o o o II) ~ ~ o o C?- o 10 ~ - o <0 ~ ~ z w C) I W o Z <C Z W I-- Z Ci :E ..J ~ o I-- CD ~ CD I/) CD ~ o ~ a- U l.1... o 00 0>- -00 "';'0 ~U.J 00> .L>O .e~ ooc.. ....,c.. 00<( I/) CD I/) C 8 )( w ftj ... o I-- - c Z ::J _LL. ..J ~ W Z W C) II) .... o N I o .... o N en 0:: 0( W > ..J 0( o en u: 0:: o LL. en W 0:: ::J .... o z W a.. >< W ..J ~ a: 0( o c W .... o W .., o 0:: a.. - - - - - II) 11)0 :aN CDW >> LL. "'It "'It.... ...0 caN CDW >> LL. M MO :aN CDW >> LL. N N.... ...0 caN CDW >> LL. .... ........ ...0 caN CDW >> LL. CD _ ~...~ CDO'tJ In ~ ~ CO ..J 0( .... o .... fFt _ - - - - - - ~ 'tJ ~ CO z w C) I ..J W Z Z o tn a: CD w c a.. c ..J ~ ~ ~ CD 0 0 a.. Z.... ~ <1> E ~ E ~ ~ X enw 16 11 A~1':~4 00 00 oC?- 00 1011) Me") - Ell 00 00 o~ 1011) NN .....:; Ell '00 00 o~ 1011) NN .....:; fFtEll '00 00 00 00 IO~ fFtEll 100 00 00 00 ~II) fFt _ ~' ~ "0 ::l a:l ..... CD - c Z ::J 1L ..J ~ W Z W C) <1> I e:..J <1>< lJ).... <1>0 0:::.... o $ a- U l.J.. o ce 0>- -ce ';'0 ~lJ.J 00> .J::lO .e~ ceo.. ....,0.. ce<C 0 0 ,... ,... l"- e 0 0 .... .... ..- <<? <3 N N C\l 0 It) C'? 0 ,... .... 0 It) co 00 .... It) 0 0 ~ .... .... ..- 10 ~ ... N It) ~ CD co ..- CIlI I ~ ~ C'? CD ~ 0 > .... .... 0 N ~ &') U:l ~ 0 0 ,... ,... l"- e ~ 0 0 .... .... ..- ,... .... 0 ~ C'j N C\l 0 .... ~ 0 0 It) C'? co 00 0 N ... N 0 ~ : co 00 10 C'? CIlI I It) It) 10 I"- .... CD C'? ~ :! .... > .... 0 0 Z N U:l ~ ~ &') .,. Ii. W 0 0 ,... ,... l"- e; ,... W C'? 0 0 .... .... ..- 0 0 N N C\l 0 .... Ii. .... N C'? 0 0 ~ ... N 0 It) :? co 00 C'? 0 ~ 0 0 10 0 CIlI I It) It) 10 C\l co e( CD N ~ :! > .... D.. 0 :=E N ~ &') Efl .,. -; > 0::: 0 0 ,... ,... l"- e ,... e( N 0 0 .... ..- .... C?- o C'j .... C\l 0 N :=E .... ~ N 0 It) 0 :=E 0 co (") C'? ... N It) ~ ~ C'? 0 0 ~ CIlI I ~ 0 It) 0 CD .... ~ It) !!? tn > .... I 0 U) N 6R ~ &') EP. ~ W U) Z 0 ,... e ,... w 0 ,... I"- D.. 0 0 .... .... 0 .... 0 N N ..- N )( .... ~ C\l 0 .... 0 C'? co co w .... 0 It) It) 0 It) 00 0 ~ ... N ~ 10 ..- ..J CIlI I ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ CD .... ..- > .... ~ ..- a:: 0 &') ...... N e( U:l ~ 0 0 z ~ e( C I > ~ (]) ..J W 0 ~ L.. Z en 0 Z ...... .E w ~ ...... ~ > 0) 0 ...... 0> W 0 "'C W 0::: c :l ..J 0 ...... al Ii. :l W W .0 "'C " 0::: ~ "'C C C 0 0) ~ w U) w > ... wz "w c CIlI -, m CD O::::S 0 u c: > 0::: ~ ~D.. D.. en 0 ....: fti -0::: 0) Z >- u Oe( a> :;) 10 II) Zw u.. Ii. L.. u: ~> ...... 0) - u W 0.. CIlI )(It) ~ CD W en CD wz en E :is Ii. 0) 0) :is 0- 0) ~ :0 L.. 0 0) :::; ~ 0 .3 ~ WO Z u.. 0) 0- e( .!!! :0 fti ~w :;) 0 :l CIlI "m ~~ c > D.. c > Ii. ~ 0) O)e( :=E > a> e( :l <( a. -'0 W c > II) -; x II) o- w E 0) en 0) CD > 0) w CD 0:::0 u.. - a::: CD CD > 0::: 0) D..2: ~ CD "'C 0) "'C Ii. e( u.. ~'2 Ii. ~ 0) a::: 0) - - ..W 0 c ...... :E ...... ......m u L.. L.. U U gal U WU) e( L.. CD "~ a> ~ a :E ~ ~ ~o D.. > "~>- CD e .s:::. 0) ~ eo O:E: ~ ...... .E E .E 0::: 0.. 0 0 U) 0....- Z~ 16 , lA ~ C\l co o g; d, U t.I.. o co 0>- -co ";'0 ~u..l ""> -",0 ~g: .....c.. co<c c Z ::::t U- W W U- .... o c( 0- ~ II) 11)0 LoN ftI I CD~ >0 N ~ ~O LoN ftI I CDM >0 N II) - o N I o - o N tI) D:: c( w > ...J c( o tI) u:: D:: o U- ti) w D:: ::::t .... o z W 0- >< W ...J c( .... 0: c( o c w .... o w .., o D:: 0- M MO LoN ftI I CDN >0 N N NO LoN ftI I CD- >0 N - - -0 LoN ftI I CDO >0 N ...J c( .... o .... o I I o o o o Ll) N ,0 o o o o II) N ~~~~~ ~.... COO ~c( ~ <(0- - CO en :E . - en- ~ .tij CO cP I 0.. en C ~ 5 ~ ~ ::::t Z ::::t ~ Q) en '01 " ::::t " u. en ~gJ C U- C .~ ... CO .- ftI W ftI .~ ~ 0 c:.~ ~ w~~,~"...~ U-!com"..."..." ....'-l"<t"<t"<t"<t- oCccccm c( oooo...!. ~:;~~2~-5 oIl:mU5ooooU5.... o o o o o "<t ~~ o o o o o "<t ~~ o o o o o N ~ o o o o o Ll) ~ o o o o o o "... ~ o o o o o ~ ~ o o o o o ~ ~ o o o o o N ~ o o o o o II) ~ o o o o o ~ - ~ 00 00 00 Ll) II) NN NN ~~ 00 00 o~ Ll)1I) 1'--1'-- ~~ 00 00 o~ Ll) II) 1'--"" ~~ 00 00 00 Ll) II) 1'--"" ~~ , I ~~ I I ~~ - C CD E CD CJ ftI 1i CD D:: en :J - ftI Lo ~ ~ CD ~ .c CD > ID en.... :80 I~~ ~~ u5 ci '~ Q;Q) :g~ co.c ..J CD <D~ c- '9 J! c 0 UJ.... - c Q) ~ .~ ~5 ._ UJ .~ ~ Wu.. o o o o "... N ,0 o o o - N ~EfJ~ o o o o CD o o ,0 o U) ~ ~EF. o o o o Ll) "... o o '0 d II) - ~ ~~ , , ~~ o , I ~ ~~ 0.... ._ 0 5c( UJO- Q)~ >..:. :;:J C U CD ~ & 0.. :J - 5 COw C I 0- en ftI ... - Q) 0 0...... 16 i 1 A 1 o o o II) M 0>> N ~ o ~ o o o II) ,... ~ ~ o o ~ I&') M I&') ~ o o C! II) N ~ ~ o ~ o o o o o I&') ~ o o C?- O - ct - ~ ("t) CD .... o c( 0- :E "'i' U) W U) c( ::E: o D:: ::::t 0- ...J ~ o .... o ~ a- U t.r.. o co 0>- -co ~Cl <;llJ.j 00> .&>0 .e~ coo.. .....0.. CO<l: ~ ...... = "0 ~ ..= ~ 00 .,. = ~ e ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ .- ..= ~ > '= ~ .,. 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0601 q q 0 0 q (ft 0 0 0 \.0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ C"') u v v o cu o6oIU 00 0 ....-4 M M CU ;'0 0 ....-4 ....-4 ....-4 ....-4 0 0 0 0 0 CU CU N N N N N >0:: a.. 0 0 0 0 0 CU 0 0 0 0 0 0601 fVl ~ ~ ~ 00 cu \.0 r-.... \.0 V- 00 E V- Lt') \.0 N V- 0 ....-4 ....-4 ....-4 ....-4 ....-4 "C 0 cC N 00 V- \.0 M 0 r-.... 00 \.0 0 u: ....-4 ....-4 . V- V- M M r-.... Z N \.0 Lt') r-.... r-.... . r-.... \.0 N Lt') ....-4 .... r-.... \.0 Lt') 0'\ N :> Qj c c c c "C .Q 0 0 0 ~ 1... E co E > :I: "'0 ~ "'0 e "'0 ~ C 2{ .... 2{ x co x Ul X w 0::: w <( W a.. ....-4 0'\ r-.... N ....-4 CU 0 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ 0 ~ 0 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ 0 N ....-4 ....-4 ....-4 N CU 1... Ul ~ .... E c cu 2- 1... CO Q) 1... ~ Z - M ~ - .w .8 V- ..c 0::: (f) ::> I (f) ~ ...... = "0 ~ ..= ~ 00 .,. = ~ e ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0601 q q 0 0 (ft 0 0 Lt') 0 0 0 Lt') r-.... 0 U ~ ~ ~ ~ o CU o6oIU 0 ....-4 N V- CU ;'0 ....-4 ....-4 ....-4 ....-4 0 0 0 0 CU CU N N N N >0:: a.. CU 0 0 0 0 0601 CU 0 0 0 V- E \.0 V- 00 fVl 00 0 Lt') 0'\ 0 ....-4 V' M 0 "C ....-4 ....-4 ....-4 ....-4 0 ~ 00 V- N 0'\ 0'\ 0\ 0\ 0 U. ....-4 . \.0 0 N 0 Z ....-4 0 0\ 00 . 00 \.0 Lt') r-.... .... :> - co 'C Q) E E E - co CU ::l ::l ::l "C E .... .... .... C C C 0 ::l CO co co :I: .... 6 6 6 c co 6 a.. 00 00 00 0 cu 0\ 0\ 0\ 0 cu 0\ 0\ 0\ 0 > ....-4 ....-4 ....-4 N ~ U 0 0 v- N ::s ~ v- v- v- a.. W W W to- 1:1.:1 = .,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < 16 I ;1 A 1 ~ .... ~ "l::s .!:2 ::: ~ I:::t ::: ~ .5 ~ 'S "l::s ~ ~ oS .... ~ .... : ~ "l::s ~ ~ "l::s I:::t .S ~ ..... o!::: ~ .s ::: ::: ::: ~ .!:2 ~ ~ ~ e.a ~ ~ .::: ~ ~ ..... ::::: ::: ~ .~ ~ ~ "5 "l::s ~ ~ ~ I:::t - I:::t ::: oS! .s, ~ ~ o~ ~ ::: .:::: I:::t I:::t ::: ~ ~ I:::t ~ ::: ~ 10" ~ ~ I:::t ~ oS ~ ;;... .5 "l::s .6' ~ ~ ~ ..... ::: ~ ::: o~ ~ is .:::: ~ ~ ~ ~ 0!:2 ~ .s ~ ~ "l::s ..... 10" ~ ~ ~ I:::t I:::t ..... .s, ~ ~ ~ .... I:::t I:::t ..... ..... 2: ::: ::: I:::t ~ ~ I:::t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .s ~ ~ ~ r.: ~ 10" ~ ~ ~ ~ ::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ..::: ::: ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ::: ~ ~ ~ is "l::s ~ ~ ::: ~ ~ I:::t .s ::: ~ .~ ::: i::c: ...... ~ 0 ~ ~ d- ~ ::: 'S ::: 9 8 0- ..... ~ U ~ ..... .;: "- I:::t ::: ~ ~ 0 00 ~ ~ ~ 10" t: I:::t 0>- ~ ::: ~ ",;,00 ~ '<to ~ 'i'w .. 00> ~ .&>0 ~ .eo::: ooc.. .....c.. oil 00< Summation The growth and changes that are permeating the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District necessitate the development and implementation of this five year plan. Recommendations made within this plan will assist in the setting of strategic decision processes and will lay the foundation for key decision makers of this District. 16 11A 1 I Not addressed at this time in the plan is the lack of storage space for equipment and supplies. The assessment of options is being researched at this time and should be addressed in the updates of this five year plan. An assessment of the current millage rate maximum of one mil and the analysis of potential additional sources of revenue, including the assessment of a non-ad valorem fire fees, is underway. In order to keep the five year plan action goals in place, this plan will be revisited every year in August to adjust for any previously unforeseen events or emergencies. The District will operate within the realm of fiscal resources that are available to the District and with the highest accountability to all tax payers of the North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District. Public input on the five year plan and comments and critiques can be sent to the address below North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District 1885 Veterans Park Drive Naples, FL 34109 BJB/bb 8-24-10 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 65 i611 '4 161 Attachment A Collier County Population Growth Data by Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section June 11, 2010 380,000 �w 369,609; 370,000 - 360,000 35574-- 3 - 349,296 50,000 - 342,937 340,000 332 943333,316336,693_ 330,000 - 326,371 320,000 310,000 - 300,000 - 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 BJB/bb 8-24-10 66 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 16 _ . A I Attachment B Projected Annual Runs Projected Annual Runs 18,000 16,000 14,370 15,168 15,0g - 14,000 -12,774-13,572 - 11 ,976 -- 12,000 10,380 11,178 ' 10,000 - - 8,000 6,000 4,000 - - 2,000 - 0 - -- 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 BJB/bb 8-24-10 67 APPROVED BY BOFC 9-09-10 ji.‘,„ . y 16 il Ai r cv u v C u coc x m m E H u aa).ta ai s E m �- rn II N F N o O n LL• n LL n 3 C (4_ " L(:-I] 1 r - r UCH aLLO. 4, I , — cu C O. — Cr O.e. N N \ W J Y+t q A N co of U c c o d C , 2 E V 0 J08 t r O > °' ° N papa aL C— n OS EL m CO $ mi Fi ri co i k___., L. ii ` I 3 U _� - LL L ° /�r/� y T C u m l: n V/ 1 d m 2 aci m U i L V c a s o CD• L d U ` L M ~ Q U N m � .6 ry ;; m a o O E IL a s / c y @?' E c- fl c 'o N Win 13 L m 0 pas w m O o Z'E o v c ao J fQ U g a Q O U Q v H E v CL c Z i \ / G s = L 2 C N. H cC a = 11 N' cc s = — 'p U a ° o7 O _ j a � as Zr 0 a ao C CO o .„ , . +.0 w r fU a O L N c N a U«• u p of :7: Tg W o 'ow m E = _. C 3 7 ' p ._ ac aW � Q U 001 I -�° �, .....r. Q 1 w , .. 4. 0 CO y L r. L O7 rnv 'c 2 d C (r OF c c A ° 2 V ° B ° a+ f 1- z _• T N `V O a. � E t 0 p N d Z N m c ° \. a. - - CO .d Q Az f; E y `o ywO G 1 Q N ( 2 O l d U � N d 0 c ° O U O @ O c R N E d i '� `7 P. � E- AE m'.- Hv o 4 me E inE ap J ¢ o, C O.LL O O U O a �- . "� 0_„ o E ;, „ ca O � ., o co LO — . a 4 " I .I A I Attachment D North Naples Fire District Stations L 5, .. Bon' - Beac Rd SE (In. I. 065 ilk off,wc fir O 1/1 ®— ;1 .1, 1 • t l'`ter ul -. f.It., rte► •erbilt tine) River Est a QWillo ghb ;L -- 11 alrn fives Shore 840: I . okalCi.Sd -1 _ Uanderbi 'Beach 7 —Air O Four Season= 1 1 f' Si.45 a.42 47 F.'Vanderbilt Beach Estates° o Na ' 31 itil ti Va O nderb!!t p { ra 11.14 to Gulf Of Mexico .. anderbik beach Rd Ed UM 882 _ _ ° i d 1 951 Pelican Bay ,Pi . . O'\-ineyards Golden Gate Blvd W 9 h N ha le P Pin Ridge - rno Rd Ext ,.. 896 D -„t�i c �i ,.0 r `.46 0 Green.:lvd en L CO sr.a7 , • r t sr ®00 o den G at }Y ' Iv ��. Ull ' 4 E _1 1 886 r{\--= a'!he Nboripgs 12.01m ' * 11.5 mi API\ I P , -.•. ©2004 Yahoo!Inc iR a d i o R d ,�._� _— -�_.._ 02044 hJ7fiVTEQ`i BJB/bb 8-26-10 ADDRESS DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: BUILDING SIZE: HOSE TOWER PROPERTY TOTAL 16 I 1 AI! Attachment E-l Facility Record- Station 40 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District 1441 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, Fl 34109 Rre Station 1.05 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Rre & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: CBS CBS UVlNG QUARTERS: GARAGE: WORK AREA: OFFICE: STORAGE: SQ FT: SQ.FT: SQ.FT: APPARATUS AND EOUIPMENT ENGINES: PUMPERS: HOSE: Watem Tenders: BRUSH: WOODS: ANTIQUE TOTAL APPARATUS: 2 STAFFING SHIFT CAPTAIN: UEl1TENANT: ENGINEERS: ARE AGHTERS: TOTAL STAFF: SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 1 o o LADDERS: SQUAD: UTIlITY: o o o o COMMAND: STAFF: ARE PREVENTION 1 5 6 6 18 10 Sq Miles Urban 14,000 2,000 6.00 Minutes TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT BJBlbb 8-26-10 3,257 3,915 600 1,750 320 9,842 184 10,026 1 o o o o ADMINISTRATION 96,947 CLERICAL 16 1& 1 A.lment E-2 Facility Record- Station 42 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS STATION 42 Date Updated: 7010 Immokalee Rd., Naples, FL 34119 8/27/2010 DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: Fire Station DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue 1.29 acres CONSTRUCTION TYPE: CBS BUILDING SIZE: LIVING QUARTERS: GARAGE: WORK AREA: OFFICE: STORAGE: 3,228 3,638 91 91 125 TOTAL SQ FT: 7,173 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT ENGINES: PUMPERS: HOSE: 1 o o LADDERS: SUPPORT: UTILITY: o o 1 Water Tenders: 1 BRUSH: WOODS: 1 o COMMAND: STAFF: o o TOTAL APPARATUS: 4 STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL CAPTAIN: 1 LIEUTENANT: 2 ENGINEERS: 6 FIRE FIGHTERS: 0 TOTAL STAFF: 9 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 20 Sq Miles Urban 9,000 1,313 6.00 Minutes TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJB/bb 8-26-10 16 I 1 A l' Attachment E-3 Facility Record- Station 43 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS STATION 43 Date Updated: 16325 Vanderbilt Dr., Bonita Springs, FL 34134 8/27/2010 DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: Fire Station DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue 1.26 acres CONSTRUCTION TYPE: CBS BUILDING SIZE: LIVING QUARTERS: GARAGE: WORK AREA: OFFICE: STORAGE: 3,233 2,820 524 104 952 TOTAL SQ FT: 7,633 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT ENGINES: PUMPERS: HOSE: TANKERS: o o o o LADDERS: SUPPORT: UTILITY: BOAT: 1 o 1 1 BRUSH: 0 COMMAND: 0 WOODS: 0 STAFF: 0 TOTAL APPARATUS: 3 STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMI NISTRA TION CLERICAL CAPTAIN: 1 LIEUTENANT: 2 ENGINEERS: 3 FIRE FIGHTERS: 3 TOTAL STAFF: 9 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: 12 Sq Miles AREA TYPE: Urban AREA POPULATION: 10,000 CALLS PER YEAR: 1,228 AVERAGE RESPONSE TI ME: 6.00 Minutes TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJB/bb 8-26-10 A 1 .f 16 I 1 Attachment E-4 Facility Record- Station 44 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS STATION 44 Date Updated: 8970 Hammock Oak Dr., Naples, FL 34108 8/27/2010 DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: Fire Station DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue N/A CONSTRUCTION TYPE: CBS BUILDING SIZE: LIVING QUARTERS: GARAGE: WORK AREA: OFFICE: STORAGE: 5,976 3,744 249 359 458 TOTAL SQ FT: 10,786 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT ENGINES: 1 LADDERS: 1 PUMPERS: 0 SUPPORT: 1 HOSE: 0 UTILITY: 1 TANKERS: 0 SQUAD: 0 BRUSH: 1 COMMAND: 0 WOODS: 0 STAFF: 0 BOAT: 1 ATV: 1 TOTAL APPARATUS: 7 STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL CAPTAIN: 1 LIEUTENANT: 5 ENGINEERS: 6 FIRE FIGHTERS: 12 TOTAL STAFF: 24 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: 7 Sq Miles AREA TYPE: Urban AREA POPULATION: 19,200 CALLS PER YEAR: 1,942 AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 6.00 Minutes TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJBlbb 8-26-10 16 11 Al Attachment E-5 Facility Record- Station 45 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District LAND SIZE: 6.9 acres CONSTRUCTION TYPE: CBS BUILDING SIZE: LIVING QUARTERS: GARAGE: RESIDENTIAL: ASSEMBLY: SQ FT: 22,782 TRAIN TOWER: GENERAL BUILDING: PROPERTY TOTAL SQ. FT: SQ. FT: SQ. FT: 2,332 308 25,422 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT ENGINES: 1 SRU: 4 UTILITY: 1 TRAINING VEHICLE: 6 TRAILER: 9 FPB: 0 PUMPER 1 COMMAND: 7 PIO: 1 TOTAL APPARATUS: 30 STAFFING SHIFT ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL BAT.CHIEF 3 CAPTAIN: 4 CHIEF 1 FINANCIAL 2 LIEUTENANT: 2 ASST. CHIEF 2 ADMIN 2 ENGINEERS: 3 DEPUTY CHIEF 2 FIRE FIGHTERS: 9 BAT. CHIEF 1 CAPTAIN 1 LIEUTENANT 0 PUBLIC INFOR. 1 PEOllnspector 1 IT 1 MAPS 0 TOTAL STAFF: 35 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 8 Sq Miles Urban 21,000 1,471 6.00 Minutes TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJBlbb 8-26-10 FACILITY NAME ADDRESS Facili~ Record- Station 4J. 6 l ~ 1 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District STATION 46 Date Updated: 08/27/2010 3410 Pine Ridge Rd. DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: Fire Station DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue 4.25 Acres CONSTRUCTION TYPE: CBS BUILDING SIZE: Living Quarters 3,088 Garage 2,628 Work Area 399 Office 96 Storage 324 Total SQ.FT: 6,535 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: 1 Ladder (reserve) 1 Brush: 1 TOTAL APPARATUS: 3 STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL CAPTAIN: 1 LIEUTENANT: 2 ENGINEERS: 3 FIRE FIGHTERS: 3 TOTAL STAFF: 9 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: 8 Sq Miles AREA TYPE: Urban AREA POPULATION: 14,000 CALLS PER YEAR: 1,284 AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 6.00 Minutes TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJBlbb 8-26-10 16 III ~ 1 Facility Record- Station 47 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District BUILDING SIZE: Living Quarters Garage Work Area Office Storage Total SQ.FT: 4,357 3,720 650 392 388 9,507 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: 1 TOTAL APPARATUS: STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL CAPTAIN: 1 LIEUTENANT: 2 ENGINEERS: 3 FIRE FIGHTERS: 3 TOTAL STAFF: 9 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: 5 Sq Miles AREA TYPE: Urban AREA POPULATION: 6,000 CALLS PER YEAR: 9 AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 6 Minutes est. TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 * divided by 3 owners BJBlbb 8-26-10 16 , 1 A 1 FACILITY NAME ADDRESS Facility Record- Station 48 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District STATION 48 Date Updated: 08/27/2010 Livingston Rd. DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: Fire Station 3.28 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: BUILDING SIZE: RESIDENTIAL STORAGE: TOTAL SQUARE FT: APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: TOTAL APPARATUS: STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL FIRE FIGHTERS: TOTAL STAFF: SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 5 Sq Miles Urban 6,000 1,200 est. 6 Minutes est. TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJB/bb 8-26-10 16 11 Al FACILITY NAME ADDRESS Facility Record- Station 49 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District STATION 49 Date Updated: 08/27/10 810 Nursery Lane 815 Nursery Lane 560 Nursery Lane Fire Station DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue 26.35 Acres CONSTRUCTION TYPE: DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: BUILDING SIZE: RESIDENTIAL STORAGE: TOTAL SQUARE FT: APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: TOTAL APPARATUS: STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 5 Sq Miles Urban 6,000 1,200 est. 6 Minutes est. TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJB/bb 8-26-10 16 11 A 1 Facility Record- Station 410 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS STATION 410 925 Oakes Blvd. Date Updated: 08/27/2010 DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: Fire Station 3.66 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: CBS BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SQUARE FT: 9,507 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: TOTAL APPARATUS: STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: o SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 5 Sq Miles Urban 6,000 1,200 est. 6 Minutes est. TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJBlbb 8-26-10 16 11 A i Facility Record- Station 411 North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS STATION 411 Date Updated: 08/27/2010 1121 Sun Century Rd. DESCRIPTION CAPACITY: LAND SIZE: Fire Station DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue 1.6 ACRES CONSTRUCTION TYPE: STEEL BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SQUARE FT: 10,523 APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: TOTAL APPARATUS: STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: o SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: 5 Sq Miles Urban 6,000 1,200 est. 6 Minutes est. TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJBlbb 8-26-10 1611Alal Facility Record- Station 401 Tavlor Road Facilit'l FACILITY NAME ADDRESS North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District Taylor Rd. Date Updated: 08/27/2010 6495 Taylor Rd. DESCRIPTION Maintenance, Warehouse & Office LAND SIZE: 1.6 acres BUILDING SIZE: Building A Building B Building C TOTAL sa. FT: APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Engines: 1 Reserve Support 3 Utility 2 TOTAL APPARATUS: 23 STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION Fire Marshal 1 Deputy Fire Mar 2 Inspectors 10 TOTAL STAFF: 22 SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT BJBlbb 8-26-10 DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: CBS and Steel 3,039 6,156 9,042 18,237 Fire Prevention Bur 14 Command 4 ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL Deputy Chief 2 Admin Assistant 2 Battilion Chief 1 Mechanic 2 Computer Network -0- Logistics/Captain 1 Maintenance 1 N/A Urban N/A N/A N/A 96,947 16jlAl1 Facility Record- Center Lane North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS Center Ln. N/A Date Updated: 09/10109 DESCRIPTION Vacant land LAND SIZE: 1.01 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: N/A BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL sa, FT: N/A APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT TOTAL APPARATUS: o STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL CAPTAIN: LIEUTENANT: ENGINEERS: FIRE FIGHTERS: o o o o TOTAL STAFF: N/A SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: N/A Urban N/A N/A N/A TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJBlbb 8-26-10 16:' 1 A 1 ' Facility Record- 5604 Kathleen Court North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS 5604 Kathleen Ct. 5604 Kathleen Ct. Date Updated: 09/10109 DESCRIPTION Vacant Land LAND SIZE: .66 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: N/A BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SQ. FT: N/A APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT TOTAL APPARATUS: N/A STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: N/A SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: N/A Urban N/A N/A N/A TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJBlbb 8-26-10 16 II A 1 1 Facility Record- 5605 Kathleen Court North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS 5605 Kathleen Ct. 5605 Kathleen Ct. Date Updated: 09/10109 DESCRIPTION Vacant Land LAND SIZE: .65 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: N/A BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SQ. FT: N/A APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT TOTAL APPARATUS: N/A STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: N/A SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: N/A Urban N/A N/A N/A TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJBlbb 8-26-10 16 I 1 A 1 ~ Facility Record- 1945 Pine RidQe Road North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District FACILITY NAME ADDRESS 1945 Pine Ridge Rd. 1945 Pine Ridge Rd. Date Updated: 09/1 0109 DESCRIPTION Vacant Land LAND SIZE: 1.78 acres DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: N/A BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SQ. FT: N/A APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT TOTAL APPARATUS: N~ STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: N/A SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: N/A Urban N/A N/A N/A TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJBlbb 8-26- JO 16 11 Al ., Facility Record- Boat Dock North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District ADDRESS 13105 Vanderbilt Dr., Slip 47 DESCRIPTION Boat Slip LAND SIZE: N/A DEMAND: Emergency Response Fire & Rescue CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Dock BUILDING SIZE: TOTAL SQ, FT: N/A APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT Fire/Rescue boat 1 TOTAL APPARATUS: 1 STAFFING SHIFT FIRE PREVENTION ADMINISTRATION CLERICAL TOTAL STAFF: N/A SERVICE AREA AREA SIZE: AREA TYPE: AREA POPULATION: CALLS PER YEAR: AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME: Gulf and back waters Water N/A N/A N/A TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT 96,947 BJBlbb 8-26-10 161/1 Al' Summary of Facility Records Zone Square Miles Population CallN ear A vg. Response Time 40 10 14,000 2,047 6 minutes 42 20 9,000 1,321 6 minutes 43 12 10,000 1,143 6 minutes 44 7 19,200 1,952 6 minutes 45 8 21 ,000 1,462 6 minutes 46 8 14,000 1,333 6 minutes 47 5 6,000 709 6 minutes 48 5* 6,000* 1,200 Est. 6 minutes* 49 5* 6,000* 1,200 Est. 6 minutes* 410 5* 6,000* 1,200 Est. 6 minutes* 411 5* 6,000* 1,200 Est. 6 minutes* 401 N/A * estimates- Station not built Property Land size Building Center Lane 1. 01 acres vacant 5604 Kathleen 0.66 acres vacant Court 5605 Kathleen 0.65 acres vacant Court 1945 Pine Ridge 1078 acres vacant Road 13105 Vanderbilt N/A Boat Dock 12 Dro BJBlbb 8-26-10 J RECE\VED SEP 15 2010 Fiala Halas Henning Coyle Coletta 61181 v July 12,2010 Board of count',' commisSioners MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, July 12,2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3 :00 P .Mo in REGULAR SESSION in Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor, of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following Members present: CHAIRMAN: Vice Chair: Stephen Hruby Cormac Giblin John Cowan Christian Davis Christine Jones Kenneth Kelly Sally Masters (Excused) Bradley Schiffer Larry Wilcoxson Stuart Warshauer - Alternate (Excused) (Vacancy) ALSO PRESENT: Marcy Krumbine, Director, Housing & Human Services Frank ("Buddy") Ramsey, Housing Manager Priscilla Doria, Staff Liaison (on Maternity Leave) Megan Paxum, Grant Support Specialist Misc. Corres: 1 :: ~~!es ~o 16 , 1 81 \ July 12,2010 1. Call to Order - Acting Chairman Chairman Stephen Hruby called the meeting to order at 3:00 PM. 2. Roll Call of Committee Members The roll was taken and a quorum was established. 3. Approval of Minutes - June 14,2010 John Cowan moved to approve the Minutesfor the June 14,2010 meeting as submitted. Second by Kenneth Kelly. Carried unanimously, 8-0. 4. Approval of Agenda Christine Jones moved to approve the Agenda as submitted. Second by Christian Davis. Carried unanimously, 8-0. 5. Information Items A. NSP: Obligation and Expenditure Update - Buddy Ramsey A copy of the Project Summary Report (March 9, 2009 through June 25, 2010) was distributed to the Committee members. . 52 properties are owned with an additional 5 pending contract approval o 18 homes were acquired during June . The Grant mandated $1.8M is to be spent on activities to benefit low and very-Iow- income individuals o Approximately $600,000 has been obligated o Primary focus: rental units - 5 to 7 multi-family properties have been purchased o Two income-qualified families (under 50% of AMI) are in the process of purchasing homes . An RFP ("Request for Proposal") was released to non-profits to partner with the County to acquire, rehab, and operate affordable rental housing units o Executing a "Developer Agreement" is considered obligating the funds by HUD . Deadline to obligate funds: September 4,2010 o Will have 2 Y2 years to spend "program income" (proceeds from the sales of rehabilitated properties) . On August 24th, a presentation will be made to the Board of County Commissioners to review/approve the award recommended by the Selection Committee . Ken Kelly volunteered to serve on the RFP Selection Committee Suggestion: Revise the Summary Report to include additional information. It was noted a more detailed report will be emailed to the Committee Members. B. Possible Assistance for Chinese Dry Wall- Buddy Ramsey . SHIP funds are available and must be spent by June 30, 2011 . Staff is drafting a new strategy, i.e., "Chinese Dry Wall Initiative" o Income limits will be determined o Has the recipient received prior Affordable Housing assistance? 2 16 , 1 81 July 12,2010 . The Strategy be presented to the BCC for review/approval . It may also be possible to use CDGB funds Suggestion: The Housing Incentives Review Subcommittee vet the topic at their July meeting. C. SHIP Repayments - Buddy Ramsey . A number of clients who were assisted by SHIP loans (15% of purchase price) to buy their homes are short-selling to avoid bankruptcy . The State suggested working with clients to keep them in their homes . Test case: An individual was able to pay off the Impact Deferral Fee to the County and offered a buy-out of $ .50/$1.00 for the SHIP loan (or $2,500 on a $5,000 loan) in order to obtain the modification . If a property goes into foreclosure, the County will receive nothing . The policy will be brought before the Board of County Commissioners Suggestion: Request the BCC consider implementing the same "forgiveness" component utilized for rehab funds, i.e., a reduction of 10% of the balance of the loan for each year a family lives in the home. Consensus: Further research is necessary in order to formulate a policy, and the topic will be brought back on a future Agenda. D. Travel Reimbursement for Committee Members: Marcy Krumbine Copies ofa memo from Ian Mitchell, dated June 29,2010, and the reimbursement form were distributed to the Committee members. . Members who travel in excess of20 miles (round-trip) to attend meetings are eligible for reimbursement . Completed form is to be submitted by July 3151 Public Comments: Debi Mahr, Executive Director - Hunger and Homeless Coalition of Collier County, and Chair - Strategic Planning Committee for the Continuum of Care, stated: . The Mission of the Coalition is to research "Best Practices" to prevent/end homelessness . Both organizations advocate a "Housing First" approach She expressed concern that the Request For Proposal was issued with a deadline ofless than two weeks to return the completed application and stated non-profits were not given enough time to plan and respond. Buddy Ramsey pointed out the RFP was an abbreviated version and the format was closer to a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ"). There were seven questions and only short answers were expected. 3 16 11 B ~ July 12,2010 Marcy Krumbine noted the NSP Substantial Amendment stated the one of the goals of the Program was to work with non-profit organizations to provide multi-family rental housing. She confirmed the RFP was very general and stated H&HS has not received information concerning the status of several multi-family properties that have been tracked. The purpose of the application was to find non-profit organizations with an expertise in property management to obtain, rehab and manage multi-family affordable rental units for the County. Mr. Ramsey stated the purpose was to obligate the funds for rental housing before the September 4th deadline. The organization will have 2 Y2 years to acquire and develop the project after a Developer Agreement has been signed with the County. If a project cannot be brought to completion, the funds can be recaptured and another non-profit will be selected. He further stated he is available to answer questions for the non-profit organizations. Ms. Krumbine the questions in the RFP are standard questions utilized in other RFPs and short turn-arounds for grant proposals are common, especially with HUD. Ms. Mahr invited a member ofthe AHAC to attend the COC meetings and asked for a member of the COC to participate on the NSP Selection Committee. Chairman Hruby requested the Committee be kept apprised of the number of applications and the process for selection. 6. Committee Member Comments . Mr. Kelly asked for a copy of the Ordinance (rules and regulations) governing the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee to be sent to the members for their review. Next meeting: . August 12,2010 - BCC Chambers (Confirmation pending) There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting adjourned at 4:01 PM by order of the Chairman. Collier County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee ,2010, The Minutes were approved by the Board/Committee Chair on as presented J.6l ' or as amended LJ . 4 Collier County Airport Authority Advisory Board Meeting Immokalee Regional Airport 165 Airport Park, Immokalee, FL 34142 August 23, 2010 :::s -! ./ Henning: ..... ~ - coyte - Coletta ..- 16 , t:1 B 2 V' RECEIVED SEP 1 5 2010 ~.. -- t(?) ,;oard of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Call to Order. Chairman Byron Meade called the meeting to order at 1:00 PM. C. Roll Call and Announcement of Quorum. Advisory Board Members Present: Byron Meade, Richard Rice, Frank Secrest, Lloyd Byerhof, James Murray, and Floyd Crews. Advisorv Board Members Absent/Excused: Michael Klein and David Gardner Staff Present: Penny Phillippi, Bob Tweedie, and Tom Vergo. Others Present: Please see sign in sheet attached. Action: A quorum was announced as being present. D. Introductions. All present introduced themselves to the Advisory Board. f E. Adoption of the Agenda. Ms. Phillippi requested an addition to the agenda under F. Communications, add Announcement of Thomas Vergo re-assigned to Airport Manager in Immokalee and the announcement that a new Chair will be elected in September; Michael Klein declined. Pull Items under H. New Business 2 and 10, and add Brewery as Item 11. Action: Mr. Crews made a motion to approve the agenda with changes noted, Mr. Rice seconded the motion and it passed by unanimous vote. F. Communications. Ms. Phillippi announced that a Communications Folder was being circulated that contained the Meeting Notice only. She announced that Thomas Vergo has been re- assigned to the position of Airport Manager in Immokalee. Chairman Meade reiterated that he will step down as Chair in September and Michael Klein (Vice-Chair) has indicated he is not interested in serving as Chair due to time constraints. He announced that elections will be held during the September meeting. G. Featured Employee. Ms. Phillippi re-introduced a new program wherein each month an employee will be asked to address the Advisory Committee to provide information about their background, their job and projects they are working on or would like to move forward. 1 16 11 B 2 Franco Alves, the August Featured Employee, provided a brief presentation about his history with CCAA, his current jobs and projects he is working on. H. Old Business 1. FAA Quarterly Reports. a. MKY Apron No. (& Parking Lot) Construction b. MKY Taxiway Design, Permitting and Bidding Bob Tweedie reviewed the reports and informed the Advisory Committee that these reports have been submitted and were submitted on time. He further stated that in the future, the reports will be brought to the Advisory Committee for review prior to submittal to the regulatory agencies. 2. Employee Personnel Policy. Ms. Phillippi stated that this is the second time the Committee has reviewed the proposed personnel policies. These policies have been reviewed by legal and the Director of Human Resources. The policies will be loaded into NOVUS after Ms. Phillippi has had an opportunity to provide the information to the incoming Director, Chris Curry. 3. Fuel Committee Recommendations. After much discussion on the Fuel Committee's recommendation to the Airport Authority Board, the Advisory Board decided the new Director should provide a careful study of all aspects of fuel costs. The following action was taken in the interim. Action: Mr. Rice made a motion to recommend to the CCAA that a mark-up of 25 cents ($0.25) over the cost for aviation fuel purchased by based commercial operators who use a similar amount of gas be temporarily granted at the Immakalee Airpart. Mr. Murray seconded the motion and it passed by majority vote. Mr. Byerhof voted against the motion. I. New Business 1. BCC Selection of Airport Authority Executive Director. Ms. Phillippi announced that the CCAA has selected Chris Curry as the Executive Director of the Collier County Airport Authority. 2. IRterim :\ir~ert MaRager fer Immekalee. 3. Approval of July 12, 2010 Minutes. Action: Mr. Murray made a motion to approve the minutes. Mr. Rice seconded the motion, and it was approved by unanimous vote. 4. Approval of Finance Report for quarter ending June 30, 2010. Action: Mr. Byerhof made a motion to approve the Finance Report. Mr. Secrest seconded the motion, and it was approved by unanimous vote. 2 16 11 B 2 5. Internal Grant "Friendly Monitoring". Ms. Phillippi reported to the Advisory Board that Len Price and Marlene Ford have been monitoring both active and closed grants. Staff has been providing all requested information as the monitoring is going smoothly. 6. Update on Transfer of Everglades Airpark to the City of Everglades. Action: Mr. Crews made a motion to recommend to the CCAA that the City of Everglades provide a financial feasibility study to provide an assurance that the City can manage the operational costs of the airport. Mr. Rice seconded the motion, and it was approved by unanimous vote. 7. Update on MKY Apron No. & Parking Lot Relocation Project. Mr. Tweedie provided an update on the Apron and Parking Lot Relocation Project. Aside from delays due to the current heavy rainfall, the project is on time, and no major problems have been encountered. 8. Immokalee Regional Raceway Inspection Report/KPK Inspection Report. Ms. Phillippi provided an over view of a newly initiated program within the CCAA wherein all Authority owned t-hangar units, commercial/industrial buildings, terminal building sub-leased areas and areas of sub-leased land on airport property will be inspected for compliance with their lease agreement on a regularly scheduled basis. Both KPK and the Immokalee Raceway were inspected in advance of the initiation of the program. Mr. Tweedie reported on the KPK inspection and Mr. Vergo reported on the Raceway inspection. Mr. Vergo emphasized that Mr. Hester had already address most all of the compliance issues and has been very cooperative. Advisory Committee Members were provided a copy of the notification letter. 9. Inspection Schedule. All members were provided a copy of the inspection schedule that will be sent with each notification letter. 10. :\Etvisory 8earEt SUf)fJort to make Thomas Verga the Airl30rt MaAger at tl:le IFRFRekalee RegiEmal Airport. 11. Brewery. Ms. Phillippi informed the Advisory Committee that a formal proposal has been received by the Purchasing Department. The proposal has been sent to Mike Thompson, the CCAA URS consultant for review and comment. Once that review has been received, the CCAA will begin negotiations with the Brewery folks, the proposal will then be present to the BCC and finally to FOOT. Action: The Advisory Board requested that they each receive a copy of the proposal. J. Advisory Board Comment Period. Bvron Meade Chairman Meade instructed the Interim Executive Director to bring someone from the Collier County Purchasing Department to the next meeting (September 13, 2010) to 3 16 J 1 B 2 provide a presentation on the County's purchasing policy for procuring professional services contracts. Michael Klein Absent. Frank Secrest No comments. Lloyd Byerhof No comments. James Murray No comments. Richard Rice No comments. Flovd Crews Mr. Crews reiterated that he feels very strongly that the City of Everglades should provide a professional feasibility study. K. Citizen Comments. Marvin Courtright presented staff with a copy of an email from the FAA. He stated that he works at KPK and did not receive any notice of an inspection. He also stated that he finds Thomas Vergo a pleasant person. Mr. Fletcher discussed fuel prices and amount paid over time for leasing a hanger. l. Next Meeting. The next meeting will be held on September 13, 20101 at the Immokalee Regional Airport at 1:00 PM. M. Adiournment. The meeting adjourned at 3:30 PM COLLIER COUNTY PORT ADVISORY BOARD TY Fl RIDA 4 .;3 Augustw: 2010 16 J' 1 B 2 Public Name E-mail / Affiliation Phone # ~A1 eOi%R~ 1f~~ %~~~~ ~1 €AJ0 ~ lv' ~ (/ fL,tLhv{L-1'''71 ~ jb1-~I it,,.. "J1{!- kf.Q-;;J 0 ~8 . 16 \ 1 B 3 Collier County Government Communication & Customer Relations Department 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Contact: 239-252-8848 www.colliere:ov.net www.twitter.com/CollierPI 0 www.facebook.com/CollierGov www.voutube.com/CollierGov June 7, 2010 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING COLLIER COUNTY CITIZEN CORPS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA WEDNESDAY, JUNE 16,2010 Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Citizen Corps Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, June 16th at 3 p.rn. in the 3rd floor Policy Room at the James V. Mudd Emergency Services Center, located at 8075 Lely Cultural Parkway in Naples. In regard to the public meeting: All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board/committee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will be limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the chairman. Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board or quasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. For more information, call Joe Frazier at (239) 252-3600. -End- 16 11 B J Citizen Corps Advisory Committee Agenda June 16, 2010 3:00 Pledge of Allegiance -Opening Remarks -Roll Call Chairman Sherirrs Office CERV USCGA Red Cross Chamber of Commerce Fire Chiefs CERT CAP Veterans Council RSVP Salvation Army EMS EM City of Naples Cleveland Clinic Health Dept Everglades City NCH Medical Examiner City of Marco Island Neighborhood Watch 3:05 Approval of Minutes Chairman 3:10 Threat Update Lt. Jones 3:15 New Business Chairman . Exercise Update Joe Frazier . Oil Spill Update Joe Frazier . Hurricane Update Rick Z . CERT Update Joe Frazier 3:50 Old Business Chairman . Citizen Corps Project Joe Frazier 4:00 Next Meeting/Adjourn (July 21, 3:00 PM, ESC) Chairman Date: Item t: c:~ to _ 1611-~~t/ RECE\VED ~" Halas 20\0 Henn;ng~ SEP 2 0 Collier County COyle isSioners Citizen Corps Advisory Committee COletta p,oard of Counti comln June 16,2010 v' 1 Voting Members Present: Russell Rainey, Community Emergency Response Team Jerry Sanford, North Naples Fire Lt. Mike Jones, Collier County Sheriff's Office Dr. Joseph Neiweem, Medical Reserve Corps Chris Nind, Salvation Army Walter Jaskiewicz, Coast Guard Auxiliary James Elson, Collier County Veterans Council Voting Members Absent: (Excused Absence) Doug Porter, Naples Civil Air Patrol Vacant Position, American Red Cross Expert Consultants Present: Joe Frazier, Collier County Emergency Management Kathleen Marr, Department of Health Brian Kelly, Retired Senior Volunteer Program Voting Members Absent: (Non-Excused Absence) Meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance recited and roll call taken. Approval of Minutes Motion to accept the minutes of the May 19,2010 meeting, with a correction to the Report on CERT Drill section, next to the last sentence to correct the wording "radio frequencies" to "radio procedures" made by Russ Rainey and seconded by Chris Nind. Approved unanimously. Threat U pdate Per Lt. Jones, there are no changes to the current threat situation - Elevated Threat (Yellow) at the National level, and high level for domestic and international travel. Recommend everyone remain vigilant. New Business Exercise Update Joe Frazier reported that we have a very active exercise program. A dive exercise was held with a plane crash and 12 souls on board. North Naples, City of Naples, EMS, and Isles of Capri dive teams participated. Black boxes and mannequins were planted - there was great group participation. A new team has been started - the Marine Emergency Response Team (MERT). This exercise included a land base with the MACCV. There were 34 junior and senior high school students from all the County schools at the EOC yesterday, as part of Youth Leadership. They toured the Sheriff's Office, and a water contamination exercise was held in the afternoon. The Red Cross, County Manager and Commissioner Halas met with the group - Joe will be sure to invit* ~ Corps next time. We are pushing for teen CERT groups in schools. Date: A communications exercise is being put together with Bob Finney from the Sheriffs office. Region 6 ~M folks.(ofwhich Collier County is a part) are pulling together grant monies to havlftWY\ fea exercise -looking at a terrOrIst scenarIo. 1""-.....,.--... ....... - )) B - •l 1 61 2 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Update Per Joe, our beaches are open. The nearest oil is approximately 180 miles away in an eddy. We shouldn't see it here, as it is just going around and around. Walt Jaskiewicz has been involved with the JIC(Joint Incident Command) in Alabama and Miami and he feels that BP is doing the best they can. Local boaters will want to keep out of the area,as their engines will suck up this oil,which hurts the engines, as well as the gel coats on the boats themselves. Per Rick Zyvoloski, a lot of boats are coming here to Collier County. There was discussion on how long it could take to clean up all the oil. Rick said he heard that the Army Corps of Engineers were looking to re-route the Mississippi River—so,this could be years. Joe highlighted yesterday's Situation Report, and reported that Collier County is looking at lessons learned from North Florida. Any information,including Rick's Incident Action Plans, are posted on Emergency Management's website, www.collierem.org. Regarding volunteers, go to www.volunteerflorida.org to register. If you have any additional volunteer agencies you know of, get the information to Rick so he can put it on the EM website. As a side note,red sea grass is on the move this time of year—this may look like an oil slick and could give a false positive report. Hurricane Update Rick handed out the current Tropics Watch report. The El Nino effect is transitioning to La Nina. Dr. Grey's predictions for the 2010 hurricane season were handed out, as well as historical data on weather during summer months. There has never been a hurricane near Collier in July. It appears that at least a Category 1 storm hits our area every five years, so we are due. Per Joe,368 mini tornadoes spawned off Hurricane Charley. Rick alerted all that storm surge is being separated from the category of hurricane—this is something new. Russ asked about the Hurricane DVD—EM is still waiting for this from Troy Miller and Communication and Customer Relations folks. Please take the All Hazards Guides to share with your organizations. We may need POD managers. Please look at helping with this task—training can be offered. Per Joe,Judy will get the information on training. The National Guard start up these Points of Distribution, and then managers take over the job. This would be a good job for CERT teams. CERT Update Training was discussed. Joe plans to do a tornado exercise next March. He teaches ICS 100 and 700,for anyone who needs these two classes. EMS teaches the CPR,first aid and AED. Will look into someone to do backboard training. The group agreed that come-along training(use of chainsaws)was too dangerous for the CERT group training. Looking for family radio training. Per Rick, Georgia Grant at the Vineyards has a standardized communications plan, including repeaters on family radios. They are a 501c(3)group. Walt said he has two certified Coast Guard trainers as well. Discussed looking at some CERT funding(grants)next year or do some combined fund raising. Per Jerry Sanford,the third Monday in July is the next CERT training in North Naples—he will be teaching a"CERT and the Media"class at the alumni meeting on July 6`h. Russ said the Marco CERT team is running beach patrols daily as observers with the Fire District. They are using ATVs with GPS. He said that CERT needs publicity, as they are having financial problems. Marco is going to train all their City employees(approximately 130 people),with the City paying for this. They will be trained in groups of 30-33 people. Russ said he wants to implement wildfire training for the CERT members in Fiddler's Creek. Rick suggested that all CERT groups become StormReady certified—Mediterra is a certified community. Joe said that FireWise can be expensive—Rick said that you could compete for mitigation or pre-mitigation funding for these certifications. Old Business Citizen Corps Project A reminder to complete the information about your organization and bring it to Judy at the next meeting, in the event that a resource guide can be done at a future date with grant monies. Other Walt discussed the ICS 210 training,which is the first 5 chapters of the 300 course,created for first responders. See him for all the training information on this 5-hour course. You must have completed courses 100,200, 700,and 800. Joe mentioned that the State is trying to bring these trainings into every area of the state. Per Joe,Judy Scribner will take over as the EM liaison for Citizen Corps, and Jim vonRinteln is now the CEO of Red Cross. Kathleen Man shared handouts with the group on health risks after the storm(can be found at collierprepares.org). The flu season is over;-however,the beginning of the flu season begins in the Southern Hemisphere. Be careful of the high heat index—drink lots of fluids and try to keep cool. 16 _, B 3 3 Per Chris, Captain Kevin Smith will arrive at the Salvation Army next Monday - Chris will bring him here to meet with the Citizen Corps group on July 21st (will come early to give him a tour of the ESe). Per Jerry, there will be a Blue Mass tomorrow night at 6 p.m. at St. Anne's Catholic Church. This is a memorial for all fallen officers, and will be followed by a meal. Jim Elson reminded folks that the July 4th parade will be held on Saturday, July 3rd at 10 a.m. The Freedom Memorial will have a float near the military vehicles (there will be 15-17 restored military vehicles, as last year). The parade will start at Broad Avenue at 3rd Street, and end at 8th Street. The Veterans Council has 235 flags on the route. Jim is also working on a 12' x 18' flag with new lighting at Cambier Park. Jerry thanked Jim and his organization for all they do. Next Meeting! Adiourn Next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, July 21st at 3 p.m. at the EOC. Please get any agenda items to Judy Scribner before then. Motion to adjourn the meeting at 4: 10 p.m. made by Lt. Jones and seconded by Jerry Sanford. Approved unanimously. Minutes submitted by Mary Ann Cole. Approved by Acting Chair: . . . . . 16 I I B 3 • t. ..., ., zyvoloski_r . (') From: TropicsWatch [tropicswatch@impactweather.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 7:47 AM To: kfpineau734@earthlink.net; SpooneMa@collier.k12.fl.us; DL-EmergmanWX Subject: TropicsWatch Daily Briefing -Atlantic Impact Weather TropicsWatch Daily Briefing TROPIOSWA Issued: 06:45 AM CDT Wednesday June 16, 2010 _,---- ---, , ,-,4'-- 1 i ,,,,---- . ....„-----_„ ,,,, ........-?„ -,_ s., f ------•--— , ----- - - • ' .."-/* '''''.— "" '*,,,, 4.- ,.... ‘ `', \ `1, / ,i'''' '''•I f '-,.. Ns„, t, !:1 \ \ ' _ ' ' ' ) t i , : 1 i ss--– • - r II slc"-7: i '' I r• I^ , : . 1 ' L 'i 1 I --' t • •' i I `... i ' ' ' -- ti e . . r . ,„ ..____., \ \\ _ , . - , i , (...............„ ,.. _, ,,,-:\:„.1- -.f... \ -.. \ '„,,,,„:',„‘,..1,.1, cf12-",-'1,.- • ..*,,, /r. , i / ,/ i -- -,, d_■-4- .I _r...!- , ,.. ..--., \ \.„ N‘,........1.-f-411-1,4..„---' --/ ,- i / 7 i , : i 11:- . ,-... N -,. 1 0 1.. ..---- / i •., , , .., 1 - .,4 ,,„ , , ; ,-- - ...,....-- ,, „ r 1_1_,!1,1 --- ,./ __-21 -- _------ / __-,'- /...- ______ — , . .,.' _,_.-- . ._ . I ,- , , , ..__ „,, , li-_ ,,,4 \ r- . ' ,... -. -- -- 12 '' /---- , ---------1-,1,%___ . .., - 4 < • <, ------'-,A, ------__ _ _ ....-, . _ .. i .. ..,... .v,, -- - .-'7,1.711f. P 41V,As• A; ' . -----------------------'"----,,,_..” ,i,t,'4.' ..,,,, lik„ i \ - , I, \ ' ,, ,--- . - , / \'''- ------ Impact,W: „ ,. .. „s,._,..„. Imagery Valid Wednesday, 0611612014 07:00 AM CDT -------'', 1-1-1 - ';PE It, r-4. vt:ILIC, 1ED jiiti le, ".7: 45 tLi',1. CDT ,11:11171 Active Storms None 1 Significant Disturbances 16 1 (Tropical Disturbance 10 115.0N 151.OW Tropical Disturbance 10 At 6AM CDT, Tropical Disturbance 10 is located near I5.0N/51.0W, or about 680 miles east of Guadeloupe. Movement is to the west-northwest near 18 mph. Maximum sustained winds are 35 mph, mainly to the northeast of the center. Tropical Disturbance 10 will continue to move slightly north of due west during the next few days. This would bring the system to the Leeward Islands late tomorrow or early Friday and Puerto Rico on Saturday. By Sunday it would be tracking near the Dominican Republic and Haiti. Shower and thunderstorm activity have increased in association with Tropical Disturbance 10. Surface wind analyses show winds of about 35 mph. However, upper winds remain unfavorable for further development. Therefore, the chances of development are only increased to 20-30 percent. Within about 36 hours, some showers and thunderstorms associated with this system may reach the Leeward Islands. However, most of the adverse weather will arrive after the passage of the center, which is expected on Friday. Regardless of development, it could produce strong thunderstorms with gusty winds and locally heavy rain on Friday and Saturday. Areas of high terrain could experience stronger winds. Other Disturbances /Areas to Watch Tropical Disturbance 12 remains in the Gulf of Mexico. The shower and thuderstorm activity is confined to the Bay of Campeche this morning. There are currently no indications that a system is forming in the area, and all computer models indicate the area will slowly weaken without development. Still, thunderstorms over warm water can produce a disturbance, especially when wind shear over the area is expected to decrease. We think there is a slight chance that some slow development could occur in this area, with a track toward the northwest through northeast possible. Tropical Disturbance 11 is located along 31W south of 10N. Movement is to the west at 10 to 15 mph. We do not expect this system to develop over the next few days. Tropical Disturbance 9 is very weak. It is located along 74W south of 13N.. Movement is westward at 10 to 15 mph. Development is not expected. Long-Range Discussion Conditions are expected to become a little more favorable over certain parts of the Atlantic Basin, with a low chance of development in the western Caribbean Sea and the Tropical Atlantic. Upper- level wind shear will be the limiting factor across most of the Atlantic Basin. Meteorologist: Derek Ortt/Pete Johnson ©2010 ImpactWeather, Inc./All rights reserved. tropicswatch @impactweather.com 2 , :- g ; 16 Ii, a3 i til L CUD I = sr Q > M d' cu Al , . ca i -D C 0 0. s CO a) � CO. Z ..0 I a) N c o E ' ° , I .0 0 0 in E ,_ • • ..... a) D &.. � _ _co C 0 V ._ O = 0 0. 1_ •co--% o = cv V " _ 2 1— 4.... 8 O CU • • • I. 161 1 1B i1/41. nowt =r`° a°gam Nril41PAENToc 1.14% of �o NOAA, NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE,WEATHER FORECAST OFFICE Miami, Florida 33165 Tropical Storm/Hurricane Climatology Mainland South Florida - June June is typically an inactive month for tropical storm and hurricane formation. In fact, the average first named storm in the Atlantic Basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean) does not occur until July 10th. When storms do form in June, the most likely area of development is across the Western Caribbean Sea and into the Gulf of Mexico (see below). Storms that form have a tendency to track towards the Gulf coast of Florida. Like t{ f t ES'tElte Like l` Q Hunt Like!, ev 3114 Track:; t I `.w JUNE I`.10,1 Although June is typically quiet, tropical systems have affected Mainland South Florida. In fact, 5 tropical systems (4 tropical storms and 1 hurricane) have impacted the local area in June, the last one being • 161183 in 1968. Here is a listing of the tropical systems which have impacted Mainland South Florida during the month of June: June 10, 1892 — Tropical Storm Storm originated over the SE Gulf of Mexico, moved NE onshore near Vanderbilt Beach/Collier County. June 16-17, 1906—Hurricane (Category 1) Originated as a Tropical Storm near the southern Bahamas, moved west to just off the northern coast of Cuba before turning due north. The storm intensified into a Category 1 hurricane while making landfall near Flamingo. The hurricane tracked NNE tracking across Interior South Florida, exiting the coast near Martin County. This is the earliest known hurricane landfall in mainland South Florida. June 28, 1909 — Tropical Storm Storm originated over the southeastern Bahamas, moved WNW, making landfall across the northern Palm Beach County area. June 14-15, 1936— Tropical Storm Storm originated off the coast of Belize, moved northward into the SE Gulf of Mexico, then turned due east, tracking across Florida from near Marco Island to Miami. June 4, 1968 Tropical Storm Abby Storm originated over the Western Caribbean Sea just north of Honduras, moved NNE, crossing far western Cuba, then made landfall along the southwest Florida coast near Fort Myers. , . 16 I 1 EP ' - , . ‘..... ... D....0,, SEAT, , naRR \ , N „orao %�p,,_ µ i NOAA,NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE,WEATHER FORECAST OFFICE Miami, Florida 33165 Tropical Storm/Hurricane Climatology Mainland South Florida - July July is typically an inactive month for tropical storm and hurricane formation. However, on average, the first named storm in the Atlantic Basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean) occurs by July 10th. Tropical systems are most likely to develop in July across the Gulf of Mexico, off the Southeast U.S. coast, or near the Lesser Antilles (see graphic below). Storms that form have a tendency to track across the central and western Gulf of Mexico towards Louisiana and Texas or up the east coast of the U.S. towards the Carolinas. 1 1 Lif::eI I 16 inee Lib:eI t' El i`4o t Lit:e!? y ( Pre ilirn?Trat',k, Although July is typically inactive, tropical systems have affected Mainland South Florida during this month. In fact, 4 tropical storms 16 1 1 a 3 have impacted the local area in July, but no hurricanes. The last tropical storm to directly impact the area in July was on July 23, 1985, when Tropical Storm Bob affected South Florida. Here is a listing of the tropical systems which have impacted Mainland South Florida during the month of July: July 2, 1878 — Tropical Storm This tropical storm developed on July 1st over the central Gulf of Mexico, then moved almost due east making landfall near Naples on July 2nd, then moving northeast and off the east central Florida coast later that same day. July 30, 1899 — Tropical Storm This tropical storm moved across the upper Keys, affecting Mainland South Florida on July 30th. July 28, 1936— Tropical Storm This storm developed over the Bahamas on July 27th, moving west- northwest across far southern Miami-Dade County and Mainland Monroe County on July 28th. July 23, 1985 — Tropical Storm Bob This storm developed over the eastern Gulf of Mexico on July 21st, then moved slowly east towards the southwest Florida coast on the 22nd, making landfall on the 23rd near Naples. The storm then moved northeast exiting the Florida coast east of Lake Okeechobee. . 1 . . 161 B , . �. , r . kti!*TX41-:;"" ,• ,'.::::,--,-: ::,;;;,-. -.:-.--mt"7'..1,15AropRor+.154.:: . 1.1- z 2'• .. �' . .a �.M �, ,may ' ' '''''''. '\' .'. ' . •' •Viw-....,zill''s.t-:.„4-,t...)•.,,...,:4-,:::4..., . •. r •:.:-.',ItvitiNo.'7, wit&tkill .i-j::-....i':' 1 7. '17a "1,' AFALL,..:-.. 6.1,it..le•"::•::::ii i'.'i,.:'•' I i tio::.. 74,,;1:I,7,:. ,ra: •:..,17.i.- 7. - ' i. , No a) X t--lo4- '`i ., +ilk 0- :kiriff 0 71!"qt1",if,:.. ,:lie-1:::':• Lo-3 .0 . C 2 ft!V _ 3 = f� -:r_f c filOrfii.ifi.:7,:f. 'r':_ tt'` alp .. A —IL", ,... .34.4 esj , x a) 1..1 a)N V . " )a) Lo- 0,. - w.:,:i.ir.„. ... 0 '1"r a >, (O d � . -av F�5- 4J _ •y L a) Lt1 C N Fiti ce Las J.:.ot%imet,:t.,,,,..., ,,,i,,,.. co cu c V ,. '!"0 .0.--A. , ,‘kte ..r .-sli,- • , -fa.. ....14.....:.....4 „I. - ... . , iii..415,:'!,,A011,;-7.,.: 1,,,itt..---- .; ,---.?1.-•::,,i,-. .--."."' - p'..117 :. ` .n c i °$ .., te.,•... ?: :. _..�...'.04 , . .. . , „ ,.. 16 li'l B5 p-7.' . . -I- • , 1 ° ...be IC) r.., .41''''' .6..' . ':',•'' ' 47r ' - "T.L. " .1.: . , -„ e, :I-- ) • -., 1-4-7-,...fi'. .• • ? - , . r•--4 i r ill ' * .' -'•C • • . k'' .--- 'r , . r ) „... . -../%4 ,.,, . %.1. „,)_....) ,,,, ,4,., ,_ . , i .....,, ,* ) r._.L. ch • 1.-- .i-P t.„ ( „--,,j *I 1-4 I- )' 'L ..1 -1 ‘--- ,,A ).,.. . s. . ......... , tAl.--L,,,,.,....'iric ',..,,,... F.-, ----1 F v\:-1._.- I -1),r - ,4,--1'. ii. ,---- -,-e r‘,. t,t j) ''''-t'—'-' ' I- • 1 .1....,1, .... , . ' • ... v...i. .--„... c -... 1 -, r7 •... ._ ...: „..e .....,, -k. . L.,..voc ---41 1.,... ...0+1/ --' .2). './ —, '1'%. r'- f . 1 % 1_,I,1-,...t . --I .. .. ”.3 ,.': rt. nt,,,:i.,,' '-',,1 0 11°, a) -' "t .*:. --, --. 7-1 :71 E .. ,.._r 74 0 • IL,,,,...1 it.' 1 ...._1- . --=‘,,t10 .-0 W... rti - = , L 1.-d. 0-*-- cl) : -44' ”' w ...... s- s- ,#.0 WI +A '-s k.i-r- a) .4-. .•.,..., -s,,,,.. ,., Ce • .- . -9\e --" ra ---s ' ..:, 1 , CD 1 a •CU 'Ix -.r. ..-1 in rt. ..11111111111r. 'W • 1 ta) Lin 11) ...- >,..... Ls- a t....574 1_0 CD .,7 e.- n.,:3 +-•_;;,„ , .4-, k-1 — 1.- ?-1 Tz5 ,„,..c). -I 0 C ,,,.....i.„ . ,_. C ,..,>. i +a 4., r 1- 7,15 CU\l‘ CU: M X : .r- (1) E-1 0 ..E OW C , — Lj.• c, /1 --• , w r C w • .- e-- (Lfb CD "-" -- .*'$.et -.< CD '4.5 - --e -1-_- .7.- --a)• " = RE t ...- 4..., I.-41.7. -k a) 43) . - -I, ii ...., I i ..,..,„,..1 r--- • a rba ' CV .o ti) z _a .c*.- - ; a„...e. 1-." 'al"-...42) •-a) 31 w- 4 .1 cE 4-,,,, -5' q...„..,34,.,z•- • :.5i. i.. 0. .... ,......_ fit 41.+,• :Es m cr, CU -- OD 0 4.1 -\,..., E L. ,,c,„.,..,:1 , -.= -o sr . • .- to c s _ os- :c.= , .p. CD M 4-8 I-I 7-1 ---1.=,•r .„...., _ . .., . . _ ,...._,_,....._.,—, 16 1 i 83 : ., r,,,,, '..7,1°::::tt, N - . Llilliltale.,917:14.:7:1j.4; 're, , yo • ,,,,,,,,rxii, __" <1:',,, d.4,,t,a- 1,,,,,,,,4„..it,i i, _-_„-:., i Zi: i7 3,1 qi1W,,t4gr<F,:-71:Sitar:k',4 1,3k.„: fa — a VT-t) fit. '"•:tv7,,,Sii tt';'...,. .`-';.4,4.1'''....,;%,'3-.--..-;4 a,11 - ., til .0„. C4,17.011\.4 L I- 1,4i4,"-Litir iviob41,4 `--0.$1(.1.1.0.4Aw amip .-1-:'A P41::.13-111117-'4-4,Atg,4reHrl-,trilTIlair*I'4444,11r-10 4".11:7-ff-,2"i';'' .*--st es,' 0 eN.1 :AI Ill°-IP kil.'k'''il i I ilit '- - %-e e1/44 iNj fel UP , , „AL.- 4, p4.• itg,1„1„,... -.'-1-.•,,. ‘„ 11Wit,imli , .., '-.* ,,,71**0114, ' -''''- ,3-'vg,arr" . _m ,i. • o * I t.ri I ta) `IIPI-mr,-. :--Vir4iils ' •,,,.. dw. ,-„.. .."',.." -.--•:. 'A. * • ,, ra EA...6 ;- ID u Ian) 4-6,10 -, * >9 •- c = ... = ,,, .:.---:,lyi—Tfl ,r11 f t in -... .. 3 ....-i 1 4 N .... ,.. 4.11..... w . 0 i''' $ „ ..• .4 it.f;- ii„ai --oft k•I I. .114.-:.,:lith- , / ..,,,,,',/it_ !.i. 0,,,,,,, Lim _, g,'-' ,Ir_..6 . Ak,•,-,..:11,-,.,.,._, L1 W'11:,'-=- 4.-•-•--''''V,;,-,-, V$3....i.:::,-.., .,, ;$ . ,ta -.•,rf,.„, ,,.;', ■%, ... - CFI , al 16 1 1B 3 , .... ; ;I.i,4,,, ' j t•-.,--,K-w..ara" -.-4' -i:',L, , ,"` • 0.Y.i.0,4, .0-,174,,]:.4*,i..it,,,,r4 i,::-1,-.,.:"j., ' r--I clIT..k.-. el '!,,,, *$L ,4.:21-%44•5:'-',''''',/nr- 7-7.1 LO 's--1 \t‘1044%, Ni'PEIr:1%Atri,.'.11::. :4401;A:WilY7 * ' .!--‘1''',Nstritj , ' '''.1t.11'.,4;•'1"tlii - - '11:.2":sit:V41:'''A-i.4.413.F;;i1 teik.4°:"4.77r7 I:,..41fi!ditwafirr- g ci 1.., irt-3,Ffflaw. 5.1L--ifititta-ft.i.,,-‘ ,...„tat,it, 41M1,IQ,,,,-14,-(.4 0: N. ,,-,., - e1/41 m r af.‘4,;;.--44-, '' .u.t 1.0112.'4 ;`T '''''''''''..,'Oill'itil-°' '. fsj UP al 1,..::,•,,,,,,, -,:.--.4„, .0.,.... se .41i4.4.,,„,- ',,..3,•ms4,„, I.7:1,- '' . 3P'qat l'zitt., ''I • z.,.....-........, CLI t"? -.. •... Ft .1,S.t......*. V 1"'' .'.1"-• ' op, ft, IW. ,..., IL) i,,,.....:. ktwiy... ''.•..,. w _ 17.... „._,A,... ,:.,* kr,: • >" ,I;tfr-dd Ire) iHii;;„-i,!;4;.',,,,,f, ..., ....„. . .p, 511 ..,,,..x.,_ ohm; I 1 71,it74::::,,;!itfiz,Li-.51!ie,;:r5i,:f4 a; Ibj INNa itto,...'• ',(4.,. 'et*d,,,,,,,i:, '-'1;;',N,:c' „, - ',•1.1RITiFIA 114'1<f i'4'4*, .:, ..'.',71t-,, , L.- ' lt:k:e.A ilir'OP''''!4:::04,),"4--.--'-* 'Of••• ' ''' ri.,&iilit,IS;•:!:■1;4,',,C;,;::;;.&'';:3-rr,'. '' '' T .:-:.!-: -- * ‘04 Lt.--4.7..fi 1 _ad. ,r•,,,,,...?L.-..,-,.. , ,tif,-,Tr-Nt,,,,!•;'-. ,,,..,n,t; - .—- . • ,, 16 1 1 g 3t .: . i , , 4,7 ., ) i , _ III , . •.-„ . . ., ,,......„ . .--1 r ., ...... , .:. :0 ,,-,..,1 -4 ,,-,71.. ,,,.0110;1.' ,. j t p *,..K1 fl tr.- . g7i,...$41 ' it**5 " I'' -;114 .—.4' 11- °P :r.' i'SINt' z.• -- tol' "tn. ri ittaill kits4.- -,, r..-.7-1.-. 4'-': 4,---416,:vie4,6,4'!fil:.....4,:; 4.f..1, 4101,-,14",f, ;k4rd-41 - s.....„1 ,....._frak.,,,Ar. -t...,,pt. ., I. to ,','it-4'1 i,,,,.,, 4,,...,.ovs,,,-,,.:, So7e441417-7..,..8.,,,vifetia,,i.".-0, $.1z-71--14,:r -, '-4.1,, ;Sri-kalftareeS7c411 ktIN`A 1 ' ,4111.1it;oelitit 4.P.14411/44...11.9,443141,Lytalaiillp7p 4:-7:,... -/-1,40V44.,,,,fa:61.044. 114,0,1 Ai f-24i;'44 a itt,...'7A-' co 2Up CI N L1-1 r , :,.. in 44rtSt... r*,24,11ft A Vatb i‘fl 1 ''''' ttl WO C N N ,;,, Isltr7efl .,t2: ?•4 %el A r.%. .4.4 43aat . 0 ,,...1 r --i ' ,. . El 0 • „,,....In t Y:-,:::::• 4-1 a 0 1:-.. -NI,.4'.1. .— a :.:,,, i a) ;1,, k'-,4.r:am... ......:,al,* - ,. .ffil 171 ul a 11.71k3k1/4 o.,,gsh..NK pr.. k„,,,i4r, :...4 FI`421:1 ant ? CID It‘ji tg 'Artnit2-411 ,.... , a) .1_7. C V' taGail M lAtk,%,""t*I'''rth'il, 11' 10 .ke 46- i D .! r ,:, ' 1' 1 0 ,p 4 -- 4 4, II 4 ;LP, -1 4 I . >ft pi, i - 4 e R11,-;t to- . -..-, : , L.- „,k* , a..4 - --, w 1, °P-7-",„ 7..Frti:E.,.-4,:4.-4.. 0,_ crl ft tti t:elml ti) -'4 .1-11 fful y- -,-Itti-- t•levitl'il,..L' z---t„. ''',-;:-.-4, U 4.-1 a) v ce ez 7 , 14'um ' ,, 4'../,1 t',:-viAtt, ,vr. , 4 ,4,4 4 ----= . ,• ,- ' 1 ii”. I '44:4 3.Y. '-,--',1 '74*,:',1A.:44_44-, ',,,o• ,„.<1 4,,,,* 4L 44 ,41.hyji_,' --, ,-, 1 44 . t I 111 . . i.:....! .4 4 i o i 1 ... ... • .. , , r-.1 pi . . imni" ti:'; - ,;'..ttmt-,-t 0 _--,_ ..:4,44 , .t.), ,,, .cr.i- -- ---', 4keljrigagwoltzPSTr.) r,-; ' 11141!.WIL,Ffe.,iff -IN, -11-iii, ',...ArP.L.V.ii, 2,,iiiti',. ...- . .7-. 3.4..:..,-.. ...4giliviggig• ri--.2 --: A111111,Q4rwir INVIIty:01:47:444140i i,:ltiti,;.:41;,::: ',:!:i,'.g:'t,h-f_i'"mg.,,,:-.;.!.,74tlt.• k0/1_4,_, -4,:.4tfillu'r-ViliPttin'Nrr . -.whit --:- -r--""': ' Aro-Vier ' :a.w V4 .*.....te ._,,,w.-.. •Alikirtikkal """1:1:pr'.' -. - i --7,-4;1' 5 gar 4 filtA' ' •'''''''''47-''''' it"OTh— 11.16V "Ir447., 4e14 47 r ' 414)0 '-‘-''' -N. IN.ittillkrt,-1 ' ''''"Abilltr• '404- Ftte- ,,, ..v, ,„ ., I)+ 4tA91,jairditi.76144rilidli: .."Wasi0411"141/,„,44 0 .., E ca 44;114 - :---Emtkigl,- alfilPtiotipwrAb 44,0 , m 0 0 P ,-- 0:;,;.'7*.•44,1EntiVO..tii.,'ti-hattiN ...-', .'.. . g!). 4:3 cn 'II tr',.1/4 It igar----. E.T7,,,'1.-::::i..;;; :: , .z.,„, 0 v..1 rml A.,- .3.tr_ „..,,, , ,,,„.. I I m_... .,m,,,,,,.. . .., u..1 , rk, , 4 ir.4 TA 1"4 :10 ' ,,,,,ei-:,,":. 4 . l. CD,r Ir_lat ts,414 friN: ,,,,,,,A, A,,-*" , WA ps5- 1L4'P C.- , _ 4,, - . 0 ':''1i4.:.:7,1:1y lillittig) ,,.F2u , . , ., - ' - ' el' 4.4 iith • , ‘ ii, • HtlAtliztii-:•:-.7-:- ,,,,,,., r iT Illiiir '-- F1:-A.,:::'1'-'-'4 mVil.ar: .11 '1•'.:. '.''' • 4d . Iii ' • III AIM .-. • `• i - 4f , % _ = _k, „...,,..::::..,„ :;., iri . ,, ...A.N: .. ; tivq4i) oii 7eN4-4frfei,,,,41hPi,,,,Aw 0 1 ''.'',1 3••• CIL ... . . 0 DI , .... C Cl) iiii. 4•1 ,.,•••4•..••;.: ......r, .. 't7;... •::.` = (1:3 ....1.., 1:1Z--''';-2:.*:37, rt.-.1i:t.1•'-'-' :.•O1''''::.. 'r--.-_.,-1,;.. u ,74:,.' .,,,' --N V lit 1-' ...,,i,‘'r1;70,r,• (1) --Z.t' 4 ,1 - ,,, '' . ', • li. LL Lim ,..1.:f...:<,.,,,,,,,------rit,.....,,,, '01.• ,,,e,;-?;',ii,„ . . LI- im _,711P- . .„..p ,...* .-..... , 'laid& ;.-1* ';‘, 4',',„;,,,'. N„,..,,:>, ,,, - ,,,-. ,pv-41,_-:-'-;,7•0"" ., • . 183i Date: Non Profit Information: 1) Name of Organization 501 C3 ? 2) Address of Org 3) Phone number(Office) 4) Contact Person 5) Emergency Contact person 6) Phone Number for Emergency Contact 7) Phone Contact 24/7 if not the same as above 8) Assistance in Emergencies? 9) Disaster Committee? 10) Do you have a COOP(Continuity of Operations)? 11) Type of Assistance provided normally 12) Please use a second page and be sure to add any kind of assistance you may provide to the community in general after assisting your own members, congregation, etc. To get a template for a Business or Family Disaster Plan,go to www.floridadisaster.org 16 ! 183 From the NOAA Hurricane Season Outlook... Across the entire Atlantic Basin for the whole season - June 1 to November 30 - NOAA's updated outlook is projecting, with a 70 percent probability, a total of(including Alex, Bonnie and Colin): • 14 to 20 Named Storms (top winds of 39 mph or higher), including: • 8 to 12 Hurricanes (top winds of 74 mph or higher), of which: • 4 to 6 could be Major Hurricanes (Category 3, 4 or 5; winds of at least 111 mph) These ranges are still indicative of an active season, compared to the average of 11 named storms, six hurricanes and two major hurricanes; however, the upper bounds of the ranges have been lowered from the initial outlook in late May, which reflected the possibility of even more early season activity. From Dr. Phil: We have maintained our forecast from early June and continue to call for a very active Atlantic basin hurricane season in 2010 due to unusually warm tropical Atlantic sea surface temperatures and the development of La Nina. We anticipate a well above-average probability of United States and Caribbean major hurricane landfall. (as of 4 August 2010) 18 Names Storms 10 Hurricanes 5 Major Hurricanes Predictions will now be in 2-week increments COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM AUGUST 18-AUGUST 31,2010 We expect that the next two weeks will be characterized by heightened amounts (130 percent or more) of activity relative to climatology. These new two-week forecasts have replaced the monthly forecasts that we have been issuing in recent years. (as of 18 August 2010) Forecast Period O •— N 0 Ol O 0 O O r- • • r- Or cls M 3 V V > di Or -� —, — Q Q tn 0 0 Z O O 110 100 } 90 S 80 70 a 60 50 o 40 v+ 30 o 20 tE 10 E 0 z Hurricanes and Tropical Storms Hurricanes NOAA ; 16 j 1 B; STORM AFTER THE Health risks and how you can prevent them. INFORMATION FROM YOUR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (DOH). Prevent illness from FOOD FOOD & DIRTY WATER Do not eat any food that may have come into contact with dirty water from floods or tidal surges. COMMERCIALLY PREPARED CANS OF FOOD Do not eat from cans that are bulging or opened. Cans that are not opened can be saved if you remove the labels and then disinfect them. Use 1/4 cup of bleach in one gallon of clean water, and let stand at least 30 minutes. Re-Iabel the cans-include expiration date and type of food. Assume that home-canned foods are unsafe and throw them out. BABY FORMULA Infants should be fed only ready-to-feed baby formula, or prepare powdered or concentrated liquid formula with sterilized water (see BOILING and DISINFECTING water below). Use only sanitized bottles and nipples. Unused prepared formula must be refrigerated. (If you are breastfeeding, continue to breastfeed.) FROZEN & REFRIGERATED FOODS Refrigerators and freezers that have been without power since the storm, should be cleaned out. Those perishables are unsafe for eating. Prevent illness from WATER ALWAYS WASH YOUR HANDS Use soap and water that has been boiled or disinfected. Wash your hands before eating, after toilet use, after cleanup activities, and after handling things dirtied by floodwater or sewage. BOIL WATER NOTICE If your area is put on a "boil water notice" you must take precautions against dirty water especially if you have a private well. If you are not sure if your water is safe, DRINK COMMERCIALLY BOTTLED WATER. BOILING WATER Hold water to a rolling boil for one minute to remove bacteria. DISINFECTING WATER Add 8 drops of plain, unscented household bleach per gallon of water, mix, and let it stand for 30 minutes. If the water is cloudy after 30 minutes, repeat the procedure. INFECTION & FLOODWATER Floodwater may contain raw sewage. If you have exposed open cuts or sores to floodwater, keep them as clean as possible by washing with soap and clean water. Apply antibiotic ointment after washing. If a wound or sore develops redness, swelling or drainage, see a doctor. CHILDREN & FLOODWATER Children should not play in floodwater or with toys that have been in floodwater. Disinfect toys by using 1/4 cup of bleach in one gallon of clean water, let stand for at least 30 minutes, and let toys air dry. Prevent illness from HEAT EXHAUSTION WARNING SIGNS Heavy sweating, paleness, muscle cramps, tiredness, weakness, dizziness, headache, nausea or vomiting, or fainting. COOL OFF Drink cool, nonalcoholic beverages; take a cool shower, bath, or sponge bath; wear lightweight clothing; and, rest in an air- conditioned environment. HEAT EXHAUSTION MAY LEAD TO HEAT STROKE Severe symptoms include skin that is cool and moist, a pulse rate that is fast and weak, and breathing that is fast and shallow. Seek medical attention immediately if symptoms last longer than one hour, or you have heart problems or high blood pressure. Prevent illness from CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) co IS AN INVISIBLE, ODORLESS, TASTELESS GAS & IS HIGHLY POISONOUS It can cause tiredness, weakness, chest pains for those with heart disease, shortness of breath, nausea, vomiting, headaches, confusion, impaired vision, loss of consciousness, and, in severe cases, death. DO NOT USE GAS-POWERED GENERATORS OR PRESSURE WASHERS INDOORS, NOT EVEN IN THE GARAGE. DO NOT BURN CHARCOAL OR GAS GRILLS INSIDE A HOUSE, GARAGE, VEHICLE, TENT OR FIREPLACE. IF YOU THINK YOU HAVE BEEN POISONED Open doors and windows, turn off gas appliances and go outside. Call 911 or the nearest Poison Information Center at 1 -800-222- 1222. Prevent damage & injury from FIRE USE BATTERY-POWERED LANTERNS & FLASHLIGHTS If you must use candles, put them in safe holders away from curtains, paper, wood, or other flammable items. Prevent illness from MOSQUITOES HEAVY RAINS & FLOODING LEAD TO AN INCREASE IN MOSQUITOES Public-health authorities are working to control the spread of any diseases transmitted by mosquitoes. DUSK & DAWN Avoid the outdoors during sunrise and sunset when mosquitoes are most active. DRESS Wear long-sleeved shirts, long pants and socks. DEET Use repellents containing DEET. Products that are 30% DEET are recommended for most situations. For more protection, apply repellent directly to your clothing. (Do not use DEET on children less than 2 months old. Keep infants indoors and use mosquito netting over carriers). Always read the manufacturer's directions before you use a repellent. DRAINAGE Check your home and neighborhood and dump standing water where mosquitoes can lay their eggs. FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL THE FLORIDA EMERGENCY INFORMATION LINE, 1 -800-342-3557 HEALTI1 ~ DESPUES DE LA TORMENTA Riesgos para la salud y como prevenirlos. INFORMACION DEL FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (DOH). Prevencion de enfermedades a causa de 105 ALIMENTOS ALlMENTOS Y AGUA SUClA No coma ningun alimento que pueda haber estado en contacto con agua sucia proveniente de inundaciones 0 subidas de la marea. ALlMENTOS ENLATADOS PREPARADOS COMERCIAlMENTE No coma alimentos enlatados cuando las latas esten hinchadas 0 abiertas. Se pueden aprovechar las latas que no se han abierto si les quita las etiquetas y luego las desinfecta. Use 1/4 de taza de lejfa en un galon de agua limpia y dejela reposar durante 30 minutos. Vuelva a etiquetar las latas. Incluya la fecha de vencimiento y el tipo de alimento. Considere que todos los alimentos enlatados caseros no son seguros y desechelos. FORMULA PARA BEBES A los bebes solo se les debe alimentar con formulas para bebes listas para ser utilizadas 0 preparar formulas Ifquidas concentradas 0 en polvo con agua esterilizada (vea COMO HERVIR y DESINFECTAR el agua mas adelante). Use solo pomos y teteras desinfectadas. Las formulas preparadas no utilizadas deben refrigerarse. (Si Ie esta dando el pecho, continue haciendolo). ALlMENTOS CONGELADOS Y REFRIGERADOS Se deben vaciar y limpiar los refrigeradores y congeladores que han dejado de funcionar por falta de electricidad desde la tormenta. Los alimentos perecederos que contenfan no son seguros para comer. Prevencion de enfermedades a causa del AGUA LAVESE SIEMPRE LAS MANOS Use jabon y agua previamente hervida 0 desinfectada. Lavese las manos antes de comer, despues de ir al bano, despues de realizar actividades de limpieza y despues de manipular objetos que se hayan ensuciado con agua de inundacion 0 de alcantarillado. AVISO DE HERVIR EL AGUA Si su area ha recibido el "aviso de hervir el agua", debe tomar todas las precauciones respecto del agua sucia, en especial si tiene un pozo propio. Si no esta seguro de que su agua sea segura, BEBA AGUA EMBOTELLADA COMERClALMENTE. COMO HERVIR EL AGUA Deje que el agua hierva durante un minuto para eliminar las bacterias. COMO DESINFECTAR EL AGUA Agregue 8 gotas de lejfa de uso domestico comun sin perfume por cada galon de agua, mezclela y dejela reposar durante 30 minutos. Si el agua sigue turbia despues de 30 minutos, repita el procedimiento. LA INFECCION Y El AGUA DE INUNDACION EI agua de inundacion puede contener efluentes de alcantarillado sin tratar. Si expuso alguna cortadura o lastimadura abierta al agua de inundacion, mantengala 10 mas limpia posible lavandola con jabon y agua limpia. Aplfquese una pomada antibiotica despues de lavarse. Si una herida 0 una lastimadura se enrojece, se hincha 0 supura, consulte a un medico. LOS NINOS Y EL ACUA DE INUNDACION Los niflos no deben jugar en el agua de inundacion ni con juguetes que hayan estado en contacto con esa agua. Desinfecte los juguetes con 1/4 de taza de lejfa en un gal6n de agua limpia, dejelos reposar durante al menos 30 minutos y deje que los juguetes se sequen al aire. Prevencion de enfermedades a causa de AGOTAMIENTO POR CALOR SIGNOS DE ADVERTENCIA Sudoracion excesiva, palidez, calambres musculares, cansancio, debilidad, mareos, dolores de cabeza, nauseas 0 vomitos, o desmayos. REFRESQUESE Beba bebidas frescas sin alcohol. Dese un bano fresco en la ducha, en la banadera 0 con una esponja. Use ropa ligera y descanse en un ambiente con aire acondicionado. El AGOTAMIENTO POR CALOR PUEDE CAUSAR UN GOlPE DE CALOR Los sfntomas graves incluyen piel frfa y humeda, ritmo cardfaco rapido y debil, y respiracion acelerada y superficial. Busque atencion medica de inmediato si los sfntomas perduran mas de una hora 0 si tiene problemas cardfacos 0 de presion arterial alta. Prevencion de enfermedades a causa del MONOXIDO DE CARBONO (CO) EL co ES UN GAS INVISIBLE, INODORO E INSIPIDO, Y ALTAMENTE TOXICO Puede causar cansancio, debilidad, dolores de pecho para las personas con enfermedad cardfaca, falta de aliento, nauseas, vomitos, dolores de cabeza, confusion, problemas de vista, perdida del conocimiento y, en casos graves, la muerte. NO USE GENERADORES ACCIONADOS A GAS NI LAVADORAS A PRESION EN lUGARES CERRADOS, NI SIQUIERA EN EL GARAJE. NO USE PARRllLAS A CARBON NI A GAS EN UNA CASA, GARAJE, VEHICUlO, CARPA 0 CHIMENEA. SI PIENSA QUE SE HA INTOXICADO Abra las puertas y ventanas, apague los artefactos a gas y salga al aire libre. L1ame al 911 0 al Centro de Informacion en caso de Intoxicacion mas cercano aI1-800-222-1222. Prevencion de danos y lesiones a causa del FUEGO USE FAROlES 0 lINTERNAS A BATERIA Si es necesario que use velas, coloquelas en soportes seguros, alejadas de cortinas, papel, madera u otros objetos inflamables. Prevencion de enfermedades a causa de 105 MOSQUITOS LAS llUVIAS INTENSAS Y LAS INUNDAClONES PUEDEN PROVOCAR LA PRESENCIA DE MAs MOSQUITOS Las autoridades de salud publica estan trabajando para controlar la diseminacion de cualquier enfermedad transmitida por los mosquitos. ATARDECER Y AMANECER Evite permanecer al aire libre durante el amanecer y el atardecer, cuando los mosquitos estan mas activos. VESTIMENTA Use camisas de manga larga, pantalones largos y medias. DEET Use repelentes que contengan DEET. Se recomiendan los productos con 30% de DEET para la mayorfa de los casos. Para mayor proteccion, aplique repelente directamente sobre la ropa (no use DEET en ninos menores de 2 meses. Mantenga a los bebes en lugares cerrados y use mosquiteros en los cochecitos). Lea siempre las instrucciones del fabricante antes de usar un repelente. DRENAJE Controle las aguas estancadas de su hogar, de su vecindario 0 vertedero donde los mosquitos depositan sus huevos. PARA OBTENER MAs INFORMACION, lLAME A LA LINEA DE INFORMACION DE EMERGENCIA DE FLORIDA Al 1 -800-342-3557 ~ ~) ColeMaryAnn 16 118:3 .I Subject: ColeMaryAnn Tuesday, August 10, 2010 10:20 AM AlfonsoElizabeth; BowmanDan; CC-Dan Zunzunegui; CC-Jerry Sanford; CC-Jim Elson; CC- Joe Wilkins; CC-Mike Murphy; CC-Nfn11555; CC-Ted Soliday; CC-Walter Jaskiewicz; Chris Nind; ColeMaryAnn; 'DanAnderson@fdle.state.fl.us'; David Baer; Doug Porter (dporter143 @comcast.net); Dr. Neiween; foord_m; Greg Speers; Jim vonRinteln Uvonrinteln@colliercountyredcross.org); Kathleen_Marr@doh.state,fl.us; KellyBrian; Lt Mike Jones; Maria Bernaldo; Phil Reid; reg buxton; Russ Rainey; Ryan Frost; scribnerj (JudyScribner@colliergov.net); TeachScott; veitj; whitejennifer; zyvoloskU (RichardZyvoloski@colliergov,net) Reminder-No meeting on Aug 18 From: Sent: To: All, Just a reminder that the group will not be meeting on August 18th. The next scheduled meeting of the Citizen Corps will be held on Wednesday, August 25th at 3 p.m, here in the EOC. I'll send out another reminder for the August 25th date toward the end of next week. See you on the 25th! MClr!::j AV\..V\.. Mary Ann Cole, FAEM Collier County Emergency Management 8075 Lely Cultural Parkway, Ste 445 Naples, FL 34113 (239) 252-3600 Fax (239) 252-3700 marvanncole@colliergov.net www.collierem .org 1 16\1831 Collier County Government Communication & Customer Relations Department 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Contact: 239-252-8848 www.colliere:ov.net www.twitter.com/CollierPIO www.facebook.com/CollierGov www.voutube.com/CollierGov August 10, 2010 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING COLLIER COUNTY CITIZEN CORPS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2010 Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Citizen Corps Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, 2Sh at 3 p.m. in the 3rd floor Policy Room at the James V. Mudd Emergency Services Center, located at 8075 Lely Cultural Parkway in Naples. Please note that this is different/rom the third Wednesday meetings ordinarily held. In regard to the public meeting: All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board/committee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will be limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the chairman, Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board or quasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. For more information, call Judy Scribner at (239) 252-3600. -End- RECE\VED SEP 2 0 2010 , . Collier County Board of County comm'SSlonercitizen Corps Advisory Committee August 25, 2010 16 11!,~ 1 Halas Henning Coyle Coletta v Voting Members Present: Russell Rainey, Community Emergency Response Team Lt. Mike Jones, Collier County Sheriffs Office Chris Nind, Salvation Army Jim vonRinteln, American Red Cross Peggy Lauzon, Retired Senior Volunteer Program Voting Members Absent: (Excused Absence) Jerry Sanford, North Naples Fire Walter Jaskiewicz, Coast Guard Auxiliary Reg Buxton, Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce Dr, Joseph Neiweem, Medical Reserve Corps Doug Porter, Naples Civil Air Patrol Expert Consultants Present: Judy Scribner, Collier County Emergency Management Kathleen Marr, Department of Health Brian Kelly, Retired Senior Volunteer Program Voting Members Absent: (Non-Excused Absence) James Elson, Collier County Veterans Council Meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance recited and roll call taken. Approval of Minutes Because of no quorum present, minutes from June 16th meeting could not be approved and no minutes were taken for today's meeting. Next Meeting/Adjourn Next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 15th at 3 p.m. at the EOC. Please get any agenda items to Judy Scribner before then. Motion to adjourn the meeting at 3:35 p.m, made by Jim vonRinteln and seconded by Lt. Jones. Approved unanimously. Minutes submitted by Mary Ann Cole. Approved by Acting Chair: , Date Misc. Cones: Date: Item' - - -.... ~.... -'; J. t w-~ July 27th, 2010 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Deb Millsap, 239-252-8220 Adrian Salinas, 239-436-1000 16 I 181 4th Collier Horse Dies of Mosquito-borne Virus Collier: In Collier County, a fourth horse, within the past month, has fallen victim to the mosquito-borne virus, Eastern Equine Encephalitis. Of additional concern, in Hillsborough County where four horses have died from Eastern Equine Encephalitis (EEE), a resident tragically died from Eastern Equine Encephalitis in recent weeks. EEE causes severe illness in humans and horses, Symptoms in humans develop 3-10 days after the bite of an infected mosquito and begin with a sudden onset of fever, general muscle pains, and a headache of increasing severity. Symptoms can become more severe over 1-2 weeks and infected individuals will either recover or show onset of inflammation of the brain (encephalitis) with seizures and vomiting. Human cases are usually preceded by those in horses. Disease transmission does not occur directly from person to person, Those at highest risk are people who live in or visit woodland areas, people who work or participate in outdoor work or recreational activities where there is greater exposure to potentially infected mosquitoes. There are vaccines available for use in horses in protecting them against EEE, Western Equine Encephalitis (WEE), and West Nile Encephalitis (WNV). Horse owners should contact their veterinarian about the appropriate use of these vaccines. However, because there are not vaccines for humans, Collier County Health Department and Collier Mosquito Control District officials remind residents and visitors to take precautions to avoid being bitten by mosquitoes, Because mosquito control treatments cannot eliminate all mosquitoes, everyone is encouraged to take the basic steps to limit exposure by following these recommendations: To protect yourself from mosquitoes, you should remember the "5Ds": . Dusk and Dawn -- Avoid being outdoors when mosquitoes are seeking blood. For many species, this is during the dusk and dawn hours. . Dress -- Wear clothing that covers most of your skin. . DEET -- When the potential exists for exposure to mosquitoes, repellents containing DEET (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide, or N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) are recommended. Picaridin, oil of lemon eucalyptus, and IR3535 are other repellent options. Always read label directions carefully for the approved usage before you apply a repellent. Some repellents are not suitable for children. . Drainage -- Check around your home to rid the area of standing water, which is where mosquitoes can lay their eggs, ~ -~ 16 , 183 Tips on Eliminating Mosquito Production Sites: . Clean out eaves, troughs and gutters. . Remove old tires or drill holes in those used in playgrounds to drain. . Turn over or remove empty plastic pots. . Pick up all beverage containers and cups, . Check tarps on boats or other equipment that may collect water. . Pump out bilges on boats. . Replace water in birdbaths and pet or other animal feeding dishes at least once a week. . Change water in plant trays, including hanging plants, at least once a week. . Remove vegetation or obstructions in drainage ditches that prevent the flow of water. For more information on mosquito-borne illnesses, and mosquito control treatment schedules visit: The Collier Mosquito Control District website at: www.CMCD,org DOH's Environmental Health web site at http://www.doh.state.fl.us/Environment/ medicine / arbovi fal /index.html or call the Collier County Health Department at 239-252-8226. For a two-page Mosquito- borne Disease in Florida Fact sheet describing the transmission cycle, symptoms of illness and mosquito-borne disease prevention go to http://www.doh.state.fl.us/Environment/medicine / arboviral /pdfs /EducationalMaterials / Arbo fac tsheet Color Eng.pdf ### .\ : Vi ~ 16 11811 "FREE" HAZARDOUS WASTE OPERATIONS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE Seutember 13.2010 (8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.) MEETING: OSHA 1910.120 Compliance Regulations PRESENTED BY: Kenton Brown, CHMM SPONSORED BY: Southwest Florida Local Emergency Planning Committee Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Sarasota County Solid Waste Management LOCATION: Sarasota County Operations Center "BOB Building" First Floor Training Center 1001 Sarasota Center Boulevard Sarasota, Florida 34240 AGENDA & TOPICS Hazards Identification, Air Monitoring, Hazardous Materials Incidents, Personal Protective Clothing, Decontamination Techniques, Levels of Protection, Confinement, Toxicology and Exposure Guidelines. Please Note: This proaram is free to government employees. Non- overnment indust rsonnel will incur a cha e of 35.00 for course attendance. Direct telephone inquiries and mailings to: John Gibbons, Principal Planner/Program Manager Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council 1926 Victoria Avenue, Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 338-2550, Ext. 229 - (239) 338-2560-FAX Who should attend: Waste Operators, Facility Owners, Government Inspectors, Health Officials, Safety Managers, Government Planners and Firefighters. ......9' ~ PLEASE REGISTER THE FOLLOWING: I NAME: I MERT, Trainers and Firefighters~ .-" . 1611B3" Below is the outline of the condensed version of the Coast Guard Search Protocol. Mr. John Tyson will be instructing the class. The date is September 28th. 0900 - 1300 hours at Station 73 (14575 Collier Blvd. Naples, FL 34108). There is no cost for this class. Anyone is welcome to attend. If you are planning on attending or need more information contact Jason McCormick (NNFD) at 289- 8248. SHORT COURSE ON COAST GUARD SEARCH COORDINATION AND EXECUTION 1. SAR FOUNDA nONS - The International Picture - ICAO & IMO - IMSAR Manual 2. SAR - The National Picture - National SAR Supplement - NSARC Membership - The National SAR Plan - The Addendum 3, The U. S. Coast Guard SAR Program - The Coast Guard SAR organization - SAR Training - The Search Coordination & Execution Course 4. Search Coordination and Execution training course - Structure and objectives - The Auxiliary training course 5. Selected sections from the SC&E course - The SAR system and organization - The SAR stages - General SAR policies - Search planning variables - SAR communications - Rescue Planning and operations 6. SAR case problem exercise - AUXF AC Serendipity - Guided tour 7. Summary RECEIVED SEP 0 9 2010 16 11 B 4 CAC September 9,2010 VI-1 Approval of Minutes Yf11 / Fiala Halas Henning Coyle ./ v MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE c8tffuIt"COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ~oard at County Commlsslan9l'l Naples, Florida, August 12,2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business Herein, met on this date at 1 :00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: VICE CHAIRMAN: John Sorey, III (via telephone) Anthony Pires John Arceri Jim Burke Murray Hendel Robert Raymond Joseph A. Moreland (Excused) Victor Rios Wayne Waldack ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney Gail Hambright, Accountant Dr. Michael Bauer, City of Naples Jack Wert, Tourism Director ::.~ll~t1J Item#: llolL \)~ " '), 16 11B~.J CAC September 9. 2010 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 2 of 11 I. Call to Order Mr. Pires called the meeting to order at 1 :02 PM II. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Mr. Waldack moved to allow Chairman Sorey to participate in the meeting via teleconference. Second by Mr. Rios. Carried unanimously 7-0. IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. Rios moved to approve the Agenda subject to the following additions to item VII: 3. Update - Proposed Vanderbilt Beach Restrooms 4. Update - Doctors Pass Emergency Beach Re-nourishment 5. Update - FEMA Fund Requests 6. Update - Oil Spill 7. Update - Hideaway Beach Re-nourishment. 8. Update - Clam Bay Dredging Permit application 9. Update - Status on Staff investigation on ramifications of non-dredging of Clam Pass. Second by Mr. Hendel. Carried unanimously 7-0. Mr. Pires requested Staff include the following standing items on the Agenda for monthly updates: Clam Bay Estuary System, Doctors Pass and Park Shore re- nourishment projects. V. Public Comments None VI. Approval of CAC Minutes 1. April 29, 2010 Mr. Arceri moved to approve the minutes of the April 29, 2010 meeting subject to the following change: Page3, paragraph 4, line 3 from"... public purposes" to ". ..primarily public purposes" Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously 7-0. 2. June 10,2010. Mr. Rios moved to approve the minutes of the June 12,2010 meeting. Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously 7-0. Mr. Burke arrived at 1: 12 pm 16 l ~4 CAe September 9. 2010 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 3 of 11 VII. Staff Reports 1. Expanded Revenue Report - Gary McAlpin The Committee reviewed the "Tourist Tax Revenue Report - FY 2009 - 2010" updated through July, 2010. a. TDC Revenue Analysis The Committee reviewed the documents "TDC Revenue Analysis" updated through July 2010 and "TDC Category "A "-183 Fund Projections" dated August 12,2010. Mr. Hendel recommended these documents be provided to the Committee on a monthly basis. 2. Project Cost Report - Gary McAlpin The Committee reviewed the "FY 2009/2010 TDC Category "A: Beach Maintenance Projects" updated through August 5, 20 I O. Speaker Marcia Cravens, Mangrove Action Group expressed concern on the use of funds for the proposed Vanderbilt Restrooms and Clam Pass Facilities. The expenditures are excessive, not an optimal use of TDC funds and the County should reconsider. In addition, the size of the Vanderbilt Beach facility should be re-examined as it may create negative environmental impacts. 3. Update - Proposed Vanderbilt Beach Restrooms Gary McAlpin noted the Board of County Commissioners authorized expenditures for the final design, permitting and engineering for the project. Upon completion ofthe final designs and engineering, the proposal will be returned to the Pelican Bay Foundation, Tourist Development Council and Board of County Commissioners and any other necessary parties for final approval. 4. Update - Doctors Pass Emergency Beach Re-nourishment Gary McAlpin noted the Emergency renourishment, for stabilization of the area in proximity to structures has been completed by local contractors utilizing a local sand source from Immokalee. An "after the fact" permit was obtained through FDEP while the County awaits approval of the formal permit. The Park Shore area is accreting sand and will be reconsidered for re-nourishment upon receipt of the formal permit. Mr. Hendel noted he is opposed to expending any funds for beach re- nourishment in the Park Shore area at this time. Discussion occurred on costs, such as should the Park Shore be removed from the scope of the formal permit application? Gary McAlpin recommended the Park Shore area continue to remain in the scope of the permit as there has been expenditures already and the process is ongoing. Staff continues to address the concept of acquiring public easements on private properties when County beach re-nourishment funds are expended on the areas. 16 ',1 B4 CAC September 9,2010 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 4 of 11 5. Update - FEMA Fund Requests Gary McAlpin noted there are 3 applications proposed for reimbursement funding due to County beach expenditures over the past 10 years: . Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma - The requests have been approved in the amount of $1 M. The funding has been approved and the County is "in the queue" for reimbursement of funds. . Tropical Storm Gabrielle - Staff is addressing questions posed by the Region IV FEMA offices in Atlanta. . Tropical Storm Fay - The County has been reappropriated funds in the amount of $12M. . To date no funds have been formally received. 6. Update - Oil Spill Gary McAlpin noted there is minimal impact expected from the spill. Any impacts may be in the form of tar balls/patties. There have been no beach damage claims filed by Coastal Zone Management with BP at this time. Discussion occurred on the impacts of the oil spill on local tourism. Any questions should be directed to Jack Wert, Director of Tourism. 7. Update - Hideaway Beach Renourishment. Gary McAlpin noted the dredging is in process and anticipated to occur "around the clock" for 30 days. In addition to renourishment, T -groins will be installed. Volunteers are night monitoring any impacts on Sea Turtle nesting. 8. Update - Clam Bay Dredging Permit application Gary McAlpin noted Staff continues to address questions posed by the FDEP and the public. 9. Update - Status on Staff investigation on ramifications of non-dredging of Clam Pass. Gary McAlpin noted a review of the dredging history of the Pass indicates a dredging Cycle of approximately 4-5 years. The last dredge was conducted in April 2007 with an anticipated dredge in April 2012. The modeling study to be conducted on the area will aid in refining the dredge Cycle. A permit for dredging in the event of an "emergency," will require the Governor declaring a "State of Florida Emergency." If this occurs, all the parties involved (County, Pelican Bay Foundation, Pelican Bay Services Division, etc.) will need to cooperate to ensure FDEP will issue an "emergency permit" as quickly as possible. The Committee recommended, in anticipation of a possible emergency, Staff address the "emergency permit request" concept with any necessary parties. Mr. Pires noted the Clam Bay Subcommittee has directed Staff to obtain a letter from the FDEP on the historic approvals of the dredging template for Clam Pass (depth and length of cut in the Pass.) 16 118 ~ CAC September 9. 2010 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 5 of 11 VIII. New Business 1. Use of Fund 183 - Beach Park Facilities Monies for Emergency Advertising Gary McAlpin submitted the Executive Summary "Consideration to Redirect Beach Park Facility Funds as outlined below" dated August 12,2010. Gary McAlpin noted the Board of County Commissioners has requested the Committee provide a recommendation on the concept of re-directing a portion of Beach Park Facility funds ($1 M from Fund 183) to tourism marketing. Chairman Sorey noted the County needs to pursue a year-round marketing campaign. It will require an additional, consistent revenue stream and he recommended consideration be given to raising the Tourist Tax .5 - 1.0 percent. Mr. Hendel noted last year, the Board of County Commissioners, following a recommendation by the TDC approved redirection of $1 M for FY 10 and FY II ($2M total) from Beach Renourishment funds to year-round advertising campaigns. It has since been determined that Fund 183, Beach Park Facilities, is available for re-direction. At the July 2010 TDC meeting, the Council recommended the BCC approve a redirection of $1 M from Fund 183 to a year around advertising campaign for FY 11 (in lieu of the previously approved re- direction of the beach re-nourishment funds.) a. TDC Marketing Presentation - Jack Wert The Committee viewed a Slideshow "Tourism Promotional Assistance Discussion" dated August 12, 2010. He noted: . Tourist Tax revenue statistics are not yet available for July and August which would assist in determining the impacts of the oil spill on tourism in the region. . Visitors to the area, occupancy and tax collections are greater than the prevIous year. . The decline in the Average Daily Rate (ADR) for accomodations directly affects the amount of taxes collected (ADR is currently an average of $1 29/room as opposed to $140 - $150 in previous years.) . The region needs to advertise year-round to maintain market share. . Statistics indicate a return on investment of $20.65 dollars for each dollar expended on marketing during last year's campaign. . The re-direction of funds approved last year allowed the County to advertise in new markets, advertise which during the peak season, and complete web site enhancements, all lead to increases in occupancy and visitors to the area. . The competitive sets of destinations did not increase expenditures in advertising and did not have significant increases in occupancy and visitation. These statistics are available through the "Smith Travel Report" and will be provided to the CAC members. . A re-direction of $1 M from Fund 183 will allow Staff to continue a similar advertising campaign for FY 11. CAC September 9. 2010 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 16 J 1 B.4 6of11 . The increase in visitation continues to provide for the replacement of a portion ofthe funds (approximately 50%) which were re-directed to advertising from the other sources (beach renourishment funds.) . The FY 10 advertising budget including all sources of funds was $4.2M. $5M would be optimal to market the destination year-round. Currently the FY II budget is proposed at $2M. Mr. Waldack noted the City of Marco Island receives approximately $14M in ad valorem tax revenue annually from the County while generating $28M in tax revenue to the County. He recommended a greater amount of the taxes from the City be allocated to advertising and promotion of the area. Jack Wert noted advertising campaigns strive to ensure the mention of Marco Island. He does not control the ad valorem tax expenditures. Mr. Burke noted it would be optimal for a permanent funding source as opposed to annual re-directions of funds and requested clarification on the source of possible revenues. Jack Wert noted the County is re-examining the allocations of the Tourist Tax funding accounts. Consideration could be given to increasing the Tourist Tax by .5% - 1%. Mr. Rios asked if the Department is investigating the re-direction of funds within Mr. Wert's Department as opposed to increasing taxation or redirecting funds from outside sources to fund the campaign. Mr. Hendel noted this is a new campaign, as previously the concept was to advertise in the summer season only. A new source of revenue would be required (as opposed to a redirection within the Department.) Mr. Raymond noted the County should ensure all possible tax revenue is being collected on single family, short term rentals. In addition, the Everglades should be a focus of promotions for European tourists. Mr. Pires asked if based on the current economy and reduction of consultant rates, has the Department pursued renegotiating existing contracts with the marketing firms? Jack Wert noted the existing consultants (Paradise Advertising) contract has not changed in 5 years. The Department is cognizant of a limited budget and continues to make shifts in advertising mediums such as co-op advertising, web- site enhancements which has enabled the Department to "do more with less." He is available to meet individually with any member to review the budget. Mr. Arceri questioned the position of the hotel industry on raising tourist tax rates. Jack Wert noted there are 3 hotels active in the Group Sales Market who raise approximately 50% of the Tourist Tax revenue. They are opposed to an increase in the tax as they are concerned it will have a dramatic negative impact on this 16 j 1 84 CAC September 9,2010 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 7 of 11 area of business. The increase would have a more minimal effect on the leisure hotels. Mr. Pires asked how much of additional revenue in gas tax, etc., was provided to the County to date in FY 10. Jack Wert noted, the County has received an increase of $860,000 due to the increased advertising campaign. Gary McAlpin noted Staff recommends a one time re-allocation of $1 M from Fund 183 to advertising. The re-direction of funds will not have a negative impact on proposed projects. He expressed concern on the concept of annual requests for re-direction of beach funds, which eventually will have a negative impact on the facilities provided, which would also impact area tourism. Discussion occurred why the Executive Summary includes Objective #2 which addresses the item regarding re-allocating Museum funding and whether it is applicable to the CAe. Gary McAlpin noted the reference was from a BCC request. He will remove the Museum funding statement from the ES. He requested the Committee take action on "Recommendations # 1-4" on page 2 of the ES. Speaker Marcia Cravens recommended the advertising campaigns not only focus on beaches, but eco tourism as tourists tend to be more interested in natural areas and the related experiences as opposed to utilizing beach structures. She recommended the money be re-directed from Fund 183 and the marketing efforts be diversified. Mr. Arceri moved to approve the following recommendations by Staff and that the Objective Section of any related Executive Summary not make any recommendations on the long term solution to the funding issue: 1. The CA C support a one time re-allocation of $1,000,000 from the Beach Park Facilities Fund 183 to tourism to support the emergency marketing effort. 2. That the CAC not support any reallocation offunds that would have a detrimental effect on any existing County program or operation. 3. That the CAC not support any permanent reallocation of TDC funds from the existing allocation. 4. That the CAC support a comprehensive long term program that provides for sufficient funding to perform year round marketing of this destination that is consistent with other destinations that they are competing against. Second by Mr. Raymond. Motion carried 5 'yes" - 2 "no." Mr. Pires and Mr. Rios voted "no. " Break: 3:21 PM CAC September 9. 2010 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 8 of 11 Reconvened: 3:26 PM 16 , 1 B 4 Chairman Sorey left the meeting. 2. Peer Review Status and Discussion Gary McAlpin submitted the Executive Summary "Recommendation for the CAC to recommend approval to the BCC the changes as outlined below to the Clam Bay Peer review process with the PBSD" dated August 12,2010. Included in the ES was the document "Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review Scope of Work Revision 9" and a copy of an email from Stephen Feldhaus to Pelican Bay Foundation Board Members, Subject: "A Clam Bay Update" dated July 1,2010 for review. The ES contains the 3 following recommendations Staff is requesting approval on: 1. Recommend to the BCC that the peer review process as authorized by the BCC on 12/15/2009 be modified to include a peer review of the October 2009 PBS&J technical report and a technical collaboration of the modeling program with the PB Foundation. 2. Reallocate funding from what was originally approved to provide for $4,500 for the PBSD Peer review and $25,000 for the technical collaboration of the Modeling program with the PB Foundation. 3. Approve Revision 9 of the Peer Review scope of work with the PBSD. Discussion occurred on the recommendations #2 and 3. Gary McAlpin noted: . The original concept was for a Peer Review to be completed in conjunction with the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD) on the Water Quality Study prepared by PBS&J and related Circulation Modeling Study for Clam Bay. . The PBSD is only interested in the Peer Review of the PBS&J Water Quality Study, not the Modeling Study. . There have been 9 revisions to the Peer Review document which is yet to be approved by the PBSD. The last revision reviewed by the PBSD was Revision 8, which was rejected. . The Pelican Bay Foundation has expressed interest in establishing a working relationship with the County for reviewing the technical issues associated with the Modeling Study. . The PBF would retain there own consultants who would provide input to County consultants on the Modeling Study. . It is proposed to revise the budget for Fund III to provide a reallocation of expenditures within the budget - $4500 for the Peer Review of the PBS&J study and $25,000 for the County consultant's participation with PBF on the Modeling Study. . The original direction of the Peer Review concept would need to be revised by the Board of County Commissioners. 16 11 B~ CAC September 9,2010 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 9 of 11 . At the August 5, 20 I 0 Clam Bay Subcommittee meeting, the Committee approved this approach which led to generation of the documents under consideration today. . He recommends removing the reference in the "Background Section" of Revision 9 of the Peer Review document which states the Peer Review individual could be from a "national estuary program." Mr. Pires recommended the title of the document "Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review Scope of Work" be amended to read "Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review Scope of Work, October 2009 PBS&J Report." Mr. Hendel moved to approve the recommendations. Second by Mr. Rios. Mr. Pires clarified the motion includes the title of the document "Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review Scope of Work" be amended to read "Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review Scope of Work, October 2009 PBS&J Report." In addition strike the language in the "Background Section" which references the Peer Review individual could be from a "national estuary program." Speakers Marcia Cravens noted the Pelican Bay Services Division reviewed only half of the document entitled "Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review Scope of Work Revision- 8" before a vote was taken. She expressed concern that the document presented today indicates the PBSD has reviewed the entire document. She stated the proposed document with Revision #9 is not appropriate for review by the BCC, as it has not been approved by the PBSD. Tom Cravens, PBSD Board member noted the document "Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review Scope of Work - Revision 8" reviewed by the PBSD included language that the PBSD had previously rejected. The PBSD voted to reject the document. The document under consideration has not been approved by the PBSD. Gary McAlpin clarified the intent is to obtain CAC approval of the document Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review Scope of Work Revision - 9" and return it to the PBSD for their consideration. Mr. Pires clarified the motion, the vote is for approval of: 1. Recommendation #3 ("Approve Revision 9 of the Peer Review scope of work with the PBSD'') in the Executive Summary. 2. The document be forwarded to the PBSD for their review. 3. The title of the document be amendedfrom "Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review Scope of Work" to "Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review Scope of Work, October 2009 PBS&J Report." 4. To strike the language in the "Background Section" which references the Peer Review individual may be from a "national estuary program. " 10 , 1 B4 CAC September 9,2010 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 10 of 11 Motion carried unanimously 7 - O. Mr. Arceri moved to approve the recommendations #1 and 2 in the Executive Summary "Recommendation for the CAC to recommend approval to the BCC the changes as outlined below to the Clam Bay Peer review process with the PBSD" dated August 12, 2010: 1. Recommend to the BCC that the peer review process as authorized by the BCC on 12/15/2009 be modified to include a peer review of the October 2009 PBS&J technical report and a technical collaboration of the modeling program with the PB Foundation. 2. Reallocate funding from what was originally approved to provide for $4,500 for the PBSD Peer review and $25,000 for the technical collaboration of the Modeling program with the PB Foundation. In addition, Staff explain to the BCC the direction the issue is going in relationship to the Pelican Bay Foundation. Second by Mr. Waldack. Carried unanimously 7 - O. 3. FDEP Cost Share Grant Applications Gary McAlpin submitted the Executive Summary "To share recently submitted Grant applications to FDEP for cost share funding with the State" dated August 12, 2010 for information purposes. IX. Old Business None X. Announcements None XI. Committee Member Discussion Mr. Rios requested Gary McAlpin schedule a meeting with the Marco Island Beach Advisory Committee to tour the Marco Island beaches. Mr. Pires requested: . Any proposed changes generated through the Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the Growth Management Plan which may impact the areas under the purview of the CAC be submitted to the members for their reVIew. . Add a standing item on the Agenda for updates on the Wiggins Pass Subcommittee and the Clam Bay Subcommittee. XII. Next Meeting Date/Location September 9,2010 - Government Center, Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor 16 , 1 B ~ CAC September 9,2010 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 11 of 11 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 4:04 P.M. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee d"- p~~~ /Tony Pires, Vice Ch rman' S-ep, q These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on ~Ui~) Jf! I {1 as presented or as amended X . ' RECEIVED SEP 1 0 2q1O Fiala -1//- Halas v Henning~ Coyle TRANSCRIPT OF THE GMP ~*~ HEARING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 16 , 1 B 5' Naples, Florida June 15,2010 V" Board of Coooty Com!"issioners ~ . LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 a.m. in SPECIAL SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Mark Strain, Chairman Melissa Ahem Donna Reed-Caron Karen Homiak Paul Midney Bob Murray Brad Schiffer Robert Vigliotti ALSO PRESENT: Jeffrey Klatzkow, County Attorney Nick Casalanguida, Community DevelopmentlEnvironmental Services Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Assistant County Attorney Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager Thomas Eastman, Real Property Director, CC School District jC. eorres: Jate: ::: ::::ies~o CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning, everyone. Welcome ,ot Q wl,1D ,2:, 1e date -- June 15th meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. It's for the Growth Management Plan amendments that survivedtransmiurl. We are now going to be hearing those today for on adoption. PI~ rise for~pl~ge. (Pledge or Alte~iatlce was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, will the secretary please do the roll call. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Commissioner Ahem? COMMISSIONER AHERN: Here. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Commissioner Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Here. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Commissioner Midney? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Here. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Commissioner Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Here. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Chairman Strain? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Commissioner Vigliotti is here. Commissioner Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yep. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Commissioner Homiak? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. ***Planning Commission absences. Our next meeting is our regular meeting on Thursday of this week, 8:30 in this room. And you should have all received your packet. Does anybody know if they are not going to make it on that Thursday meeting? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, looks like we have a quorum. And David, on the slight chance this meeting today gets continued, what day was that it would have been continued to? MR. WEEKS: Thursday, the 17th. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So as we go on, I'll make sure if we have to continue we use that date then. Thank you. MR. WEEKS: Mr. Chairman, on that note, if! may -- and for the record, David Weeks of the Comprehensive Planning Section. Hopefully we'll be done today, but we do have to be out of this room at 4:00 for another meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, if we're still in this room at 4:00, we got bigger problems that we can't fInish today anyway, so-- ***Okay, with that in mind, let's just move right into the fIrst adoption item. It's CP-2007-3. It's the Golden Gate Area Master Plan land use map series, and this is for the Mission Subdistrict, which is out off Oil Well Road. Mr. K1atzkow, because this is adoption, does this require swearing in and-- MR. KLATZKOW: I like swearing people in all the time, because the last thing I want to hear is somebody lying to a board and saying ha ha, you didn't swear me in anyway. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, I'm sure that all the good people we have wouldn't do that. But all those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (Speakers were duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Disclosures on the part of the Planning Commission. COMMISSIONER CARON: I spoke to Mr. Y ovanovich briefly, just as a reminder that it was coming up. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I spoke to him too, only to ask him why he wasn't asking me what I thought about it. ", So with that iii mind, we will move forward. _~opav!d, you ~fU1t to make some introductory statements or do you want-- MR. WEEKS":' I sure do. 2 ~,~, 16 I 1 8 5 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, that'll work. MR. WEEKS: Again, for the record, David Weeks of the Comprehensive Planning Section. As you've already acknowledged, Mr. Chairman, this is for comprehensive plan amendments, and this is the adoption hearing. This is the fmal opportunity for the Planning Commission to review these fIve petitions and make your fInal recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners whether to adopt, not adopt or adopt with changes these various petitions. As is required by state law, there is a notice of intent courtesy sign-up sheet, such as the one I'm holding, that appears out in the hallway on the table, and there is a pen there. This is an opportunity for citizens or anyone that's interested to sign up and be notifIed by the Florida Department of Community Affairs once they have issued their notice of intent on the adopted amendments, whether they are found in compliance or not in compliance with state law. The County Commission hearing for these petitions is scheduled for Wednesday, July 28th of this year. As always, at the conclusion of to day's meeting, assuming we get through all fIve petitions, we would like to collect the binders, if any of you do not wish to hold on to them, the binders and the contents for reuse for the hearing in front of the Board of County Commissioners and subsequent transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs and other state and regional agencies. You may recall that at the transmittal stage there were a total of 10 petitions in this cycle, and we're now down to fIve. Four of those are private sector petitions. Four petitions were withdrawn and one has been continued out of this cycle. Only one petition has changes proposed by the petitioner. And of course we'll get to that as we get to the specifIc petition. But that is Petition CP2008-2, located on Randall Boulevard in Golden Gate Estates. Staff does have last-minutes changes for another petition, and I believe Corby passed out a handout, in addition to the e-mail sent to you late, very late yesterday afternoon. It's a short change. That's pertaining to Petition CP-2008-4. That's the sending lands property known as Filmore Recycling or Yawl Recycling located next to the landfIll. And that change is in response to the objection from the Florida Department of Community Affairs to that petition. As is usual, most of the issues for these petitions have been thoroughly vetted at the transmittal hearings. So typically -- though of course the petition is open for whatever discussion you may desire, typically the discussion is focused on the Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report from the Florida Department of Community Affairs and of course any changes that have been made to the petition since your transmittal hearing. I would point out, as is noted in the staff report, that only obj ections can form the basis of a noncompliance fInding by DCA. And that would be if an objection is not satisfactorily addressed. And an objection may be addressed in a number of ways: One, the petition itself can be changed; the request can be changed in some way. Secondly, more data and analysis can be provided. Thirdly, a greater explanation of the request can be provided, or some combination of the above. Or of course choosing not to adopt an the amendment is also an option. And of course the specifIcs of each petition and any related Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report issues will be discussed as we go through the individual petitions. And that concludes my introductory remarks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, David. And the -- Richard, you represent the applicant? MR. YOV ANOVICH: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, it's all yours. MR. YOV ANOVICH: Good morning. For the record, Rich Y ovanovich, on behalf of the petitioner for Petition 2007-3. Todd Gimmer (phonetic) from the church is here, as well as Bob Duane from Hole-Montes, to answer any questions. You've seen this petition before. It's for a church out in the Golden Gate Estates area off Oil Well Road. You all recommended unanimously to transmit the report. I don't believe there are any formal objections from DCA regarding this petition. And with that, there was one change to the petition since you saw it, and that related to the height of the -- 3 f 6' , 1B'- \ originally all buildings were limited to a height of 30 feet in the subdistrict. However, we requested a change to 35 feet for the worship center. All other buildings would remain 30 feet. That's the only change that occurred since the transmittal hearing. Unless you need a more detailed report on this petition, we'll be happy to answer any questions you might have regarding this petition. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If I'm not mistaken, I think you already said it, the Planning Commission was unanimous in its approval of this -- MR. YOV ANOVICH: Right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- in the transmittal. MR. YOV ANOVICH: Yes, sir, I did say that, and yes, you did. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any questions or comments from the Planning Commission on this particular GMP A amendment? Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Just a quick question. Does it have to be in the GMP listed as zoned height? MR. YOV ANOVICH: We can put that if you need to. But I think it's understood-- COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. MR. YOV ANOVICH: -- that zoned -- when we talk about height, we're talking about zoned heights, not actual heights, but -- COMMISSIONER CARON: Ijust don't want-- MR. YOV ANOVICH: And I'll defer to David on that one. MR. WEEKS: I'll simply say that if it's not specifIed, then that leaves it up to the discretion of the hearing bodies during the zoning petition. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Richard, the reference to the 35 feet, which page is it on of our staff report? MR. YOV ANOVICH: Well, since I don't get a copy of the staff report with the backup information, Mr. Strain, I hate to tell you I don't know. But it's under the language that's in bold. It says soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this subdistrict. And then you'll have a paragraph that says, the maximum total floor area allowed in this subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Mark? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. MR. YOV ANOVICH: The maximum height -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: It's right under the tab, second page. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MR. YOV ANOVICH: But it's in the general description of the subdistrict. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, understand. Just wanted to make sure it got in there. I didn't see a problem with it, but I wanted to make sure it was there. MR. YOV ANOVICH: I know it's in what we sent back. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Gotcha. Okay, anybody else have any other questions on this particular amendment? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Staff, do you have a report, anything you want to say? MR. WEEKS: Simply to say that the only -- the recommendation from the staff is not to adopt, and the single reason is because of the reason we expressed at transmittal for all of the petitions in Golden Gate Estates, and that is that we prefer to have a restudy to take a comprehensive review of all of the petitions, whether they be commercial or other nonresidential uses such as proposed here to allow the Estates residents the opportunity to voice their opinions as to where these nonresidential uses should be located, the size, the intensity of use, et cetera. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there any public speakers registered? MR. WEEKS: There are none. 4 16 I fa 5 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody from the public wish to speak on this item? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, hearing none, we will entertain a motion. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll make it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I move we forward Petition CP-2007-3 to the County Commission with a recommendation of approval. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'll second it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Now, is that subject by the motion maker and the second to the change that was told to us by the applicant -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- making it 35 feet? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 8-0. MR. YOV ANOVICH: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. ***Next item up is CP-2008-2. Again, it's the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. And this is for the Randall Boulevard Commercial Center, Randall and Immokalee Road. All those wishing to participate on this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (Speakers were duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Disclosures on the part of Planning Commission? Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yes, I had a meeting with the petitioner and the petitioner's agent. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And let's see, I've had a meeting with the petitioner, the petitioner's agents, and I have been flooded with a lot of e-mails saying how badly the people would like to see this project for the most part. A couple of the e-mails had specifIcs in them about things they would like to see, although at this stage, getting in the development standards isn't customarily done at the GMP level, so that will come back during the rezone process. But I have had -- all the ones I can remember are all complimentary in favor of the project. So with that in mind, we'll move forward. Bruce? COMMISSIONER CARON: I should say e-mails as well. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MR. ANDERSON: Good morning, Commissioners. For record, my name is Bruce Anderson from the Roetzel and Andress Law Firm. I'm here on behalf of the Emergent Development Group. Its principal, Jack Sullivan, is with us today. And also with me is Tim Hancock, the director of planning for Davidson Engineering. You will probably recall this application from your prior hearing. This amendment enjoys widespread community support. 5 . t -', ~.' ~ 16 J 1851:. ~. ~ '. . It was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and approved for transmittal by the County Commission with a unanimous vote. The Department of Community Affairs raised two objections to this amendment. The fIrst objection was that the amendment language did not adequately identify the types and maximum densities and intensities of the uses that would be allowed. Their concern was that the amendment language would allow for a self-amending comprehensive plan amendment. Their thinking is that if the county later decided to amend the uses allowed in the C-4 zoning district, that the effect of that would be to amend this comprehensive plan language and add uses that were not contemplated at the time this was approved. DCA didn't like that. I think they like to maintain control. County staff and I held a subsequent discussion with the Department of Community Affairs staff, and I believe that we reached an understanding that tying the uses that are allowed to the C-4 zoning district as it exists on the date of adoption would address their concerns. This same type of issue had been handled in the same manner on another commercial district in the Golden Gate Master Plan. Their second objection concerned transportation planning. They contented that the proposed amendment was not consistent with Objective 5 and Policy 5.1 of the transportation element of the comprehensive plan. Objective 5 states: The county shall coordinate the transportation system development process with the Future Land Use Map. In more detail, Policy 5.1 states that the county shall review all rezone petitions, amendments to the Future Land Use Element and other types of applications with consideration of their impact on the county's overall transportation system. And the county will not approve any application that would signifIcantly impact a roadway segment that is operating or projected to operate below the adopted level of service unless, quote, specifIc mitigating stipulations are also approved, end quote. Again, this matter was discussed with county staff, with the Department of Community Affairs staff. And to address their objection, phasing language is to be added to the last paragraph of the subdistrict. I'm going to let Michelle or Nick read you the fInal version that was arrived at about fIve minutes ago. And you may recall from the fIrst hearing that a developer contribution agreement was being negotiated in connection with this plan amendment. Under the broad parameters of that agreement, my client is donating right-of-way for the eventual six-Ianing of Randall Boulevard abutting this subdistrict. At present the property is bracketed on the west side by the Big Corkscrew Island Fire District. It includes their fIre station and an administration building in the rear. At the eastern end of this subdistrict is a parcel that is owned by the county and leased to the State Forestry Division. A fIre tower is also located on the county's property. And when Randall Boulevard is widened, both the Forestry Service building and the fIre station -- not the fIre administration building, but the fIre station itself -- would both have to be moved because of the widening. Under the DCA, both of these essential service governmental agencies would collocate on the eastern corner of the parcel of Eighth Street and Randall Boulevard where a traffic signal will go. That relocation will be at the sole cost of my client and another property owner. And that sole relocation cost includes the cost of either rezoning or obtaining a conditional use approval and getting Site Development Plan approval and providing site plan -- or site improvements as well. My client will also be acquiring from the fIre district a fIve-acre parcel to the south, which will be used primarily for water management from the Randall Boulevard widening and Immokalee intersection improvements. Ultimately that fIve acres would also be donated to the county. There is one owner who has withdrawn from the proposed developer contribution agreement. It is the owner of the convenience store gas station that already exists there. His company was included simply because they were an adjacent owner already in the subdistrict, and it was anticipated that they would become a party to the agreement if the road design was acceptable to them. However, they determined that the road design was not acceptable. All of the other provisions of the developer contribution agreement remain intact. Exhibits are being prepared at the request of staff to be attached to the fInal version of the agreement, which is scheduled to go to the 6 16 11 a 5 County Commission on the day before this plan amendment would be heard by them. That developer contribution agreement will also contain the phasing language that you'll hear today. The other change to the amendment is that my client has agreed to add language that a grocery store anchor of at least 35,000 square feet must be included in the Phase I portion of the project. And the Phase I portion of the project is limited to 100,000 square feet. I'll ask Mr. Hancock to come up now and address some of the other factors. And after that, he and I will make ourselves available for questions. MR. HANCOCK: Good morning, Mr. Chairman, Commissioners. Commissioner Ahem, welcome. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Thank you. MR. HANCOCK: The amended documents before you today were prepared in response, as Bruce mentioned, to the two comments received from the Department of Community Affairs, as well as to accommodate the property owner of Tract 71, who has again decided to withdraw. The change has not impacted the transportation objectives for the future widening of Randall Boulevard, which was the primary reason my client sought to include them in this amendment. Regardless, the numerous public benefIts associated with the project, which include the Big Corkscrew Island Fire District and Forestry Service relocations, along with transportation commitments to accommodate the future widening of Randall Boulevard remain intact. The only noticeable change is reduction of 10,000 square feet of retail development that was briefly allocated to Tract 71. Also included in your revised information are updated tables that identify the demand and supply of neighborhood and community commercial in the primary and secondary trade areas, as well as the larger Estates area two miles east of 951. As has been documented well in these proceedings, there continues to be a shortage of sites that are sized appropriately to provide for what constitutes neighborhood and community commercial demand in this area, not just today, but into the future. As you may have noted from the response from DCA, the demand and supply issues were not raised in the request for additional information. I'd like to briefly update you on the plan roadway design. We had some signifIcant discussion on this, and again, it has been a developing issue, as the consultant for the county continues to work on the design, which then has impacts on the project, which then has impacts on what's before you today. But before you is something I think we can use to walk you through the most recent iteration of that. As Bruce mentioned, phasing language has been placed in the proposed GMP language that would limit the fIrst 100,000 square feet to an initial phase of development. That would occur primarily in that center portion that you see here. The project access will be limited to three points along Randall. The fIrst point is really on the western edge of what we call the core portion of the project. And the purpose of that access is yes, to provide some access to the core development, but primarily to provide access to the western parcels on this side. So again, you'll - there are two through lanes, which is a continuous part of this design that will be from west to east along Randall Boulevard. And the fIrst turning movement here will provide access both to the project and to the parcels to the west. Ultimately, as you know in your Land Development Code, commercial projects are required to interconnect. We think there will be additional opportunities as these sites develop for additional interconnection. But at this time that will preserve the access conditions that exist today. Secondly is an access point right here, which will initially be a right in/right out access for the project. Ultimately in the Phase II construction, that particular access point may be severed. We're aware of that and planning for that as a part of our project moving forward. The third access point on Randall right here will constitute a right in/right out, as well as a westbound left in. Beyond that, the only additional project access is back here on Eighth, which is a reverse frontage road that ultimately we think will carry a fair amount of the traffic for the project, because Eighth will be signalized at this point. So that makes the most sense. We're trying to accommodate to make sure that the through movements for the Estates residents are preserved and protected, while the project still has ample access to be market viable. We think 7 . ,his plan will help us get there. . j 16 I 1 B 5 .~ The land use merits of the project remain in primarily bringing much needed commercial service to a currently underserved area. The larger benefIts of this approval are numerically quantifIed in the amended greenhouse gas analysis, but are easily recognized in reduced trip lengths for residents in the area, as well as increased employment opportunities, all in a location that enjoys a great deal of support. There are two changes to the language that staffhas approved. And by the way, we are working from the staff amended language that was in your supplemental staff report. We have no issues or concerns with that language. But Ms. Ashton picked up on something after the withdraw of Tract 71. And if I can take you to supplemental staff report, Page 4 is the subdistrict text as revised by the petitioner and further revised by staff. In paragraph -- the fIrst paragraph three under Randall Boulevard commercial subdistrict, the last sentence which states: Development intensity in the subdistrict shall not exceed 401,950 square feet of floor area. Because that may affect Tract 71, that sentence is recommending to be struck. And I will go over its replacement language in just a moment. The second strike-through is under 3.E.I. It states: The development shall be limited to 21,000 square feet. Again, that's a limitation on Tract 71 that was not in the original language. So we are requesting that that be struck also. And the comfort you have that the cap on the square footage for the new commercial area exists under Item F.l wherein development intensity on the tracts listed, which are basically for all intense and purposes all the yellow areas you saw in the previous exhibit is capped at 360,950 square feet. In a sense the overall square footage that can be constructed on this site has gone down 10,000 square feet. But because Tract 71 is no longer part of the application, we are reverting back to the previous GMP language for that tract which did not have a square footage limitation on it. So those two changes are in essence returning that parcel back to its ability prior to this amendment but still retaining a cap on the balance of the parcels you see here. I have a strange feeling I've lost people on that, but we'll be happy to address any questions you may have on that. With that, I will turn it back over to Bruce for any closing comments. Also, if you have any transportation related comments, Jeff Davidson is also here with us to address those Issues. Bruce? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, I have a question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Mr. Murray. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Tim, the issue that you just brought up about reverting that language back to it, do you have any concerns with DCA taking any interest in that? And what is your -- I mean, you have no control over it, they've opted out, right? MR. HANCOCK: Correct. And because we're reverting back to language that was previously approved by DCA in the current compo plan, we're just leaving them alone. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Because it's acceptable, or deemed acceptable. MR. HANCOCK: That is correct. And that way any limitations you see on square footage therefore only applies to those parcels that are being added to the subdistrict. We-- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay, that makes sense. MR. HANCOCK: -- think that's appropriate. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Makes sense. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Was Bruce going to make any -- okay, any questions of the applicant at this stage? Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I have a question. You know, you're showing a road layout plan. How does that affect the parcel it's not in? In other words, is that the roadway that's going to have to be there? MR. HANCOCK: Yes. And that's the road design that's going to be there with or without this project. And that's kind of the interesting point. It does not affect the parcel that is Tract 71. Actually, it was designed to really kind of go around those parcels. So that the road design you see, with or without this project, is 8 .,1 ,J. 16 j 1 ~, going to look very much like that. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. And what that's going to mean is you're going to have to drive past that facility, turn around and do a 180 and come back to it. MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir. Which to a great degree is the existing condition. If you drive out Immokalee Road and turn right on Randall, you've got to make a pretty tough jug handle move there. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yep. MR. HANCOCK: And so it really -- to be honest, it's safer. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay, thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Was that road design dictated by you or by county? MR. HANCOCK: If it was dictated by us, it would have about seven more access points. So it was primarily by the county, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know it was, and I wanted to get that on the record. Because you had -- it's not your doing that's cutting this other piece of property or changing the other piece of property's access, it's being done because it's a county requirement. MR. HANCOCK: Yes, sir. And that was explained to the property owner by Nick in a meeting with him also. Because we felt that was very important. This is coming. This road design is coming one way or the other. And for safety reasons, the existing conditions cannot be maintained. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I had a resident in the area up there sent me an e-mail discussing issues that were really not pertinent to a GMP amendment, but they're development standards. But I thought I'd take this opportunity to read them to you so that when you do come in for your rezone you can take them into consideration. It may solve some issues that could potentially come up. And it's from a gentleman by the name of Dan Brett, B-R-E-T-T. First thing he said was the height of the buildings, will they be visible above the Valencia Lakes barrier wall when standing in the back yard to those homes along Randall Boulevard. Now, I'm not asking you to respond to this, I'm suggesting when you come in you might want to bring sight view studies, if you get through adoption okay. When you come back and when you rezone, address these issues. The second one is light from the shopping center parking lot shining into the back yards of houses along Randall Boulevard. And the third one is noise. Will there be any outdoor dining or live music from any tenant in the shopping center. So I think in your future presentations, assuming we get that far, please make sure you address those issues. GMP A is not the necessary tool now to address them, but you can in the future. MR. HANCOCK: Agreed. And one thing that Mr. Sullivan made a commitment to in our prior hearing to you and remains is that we will be working with a community group as we go forward with the design of this shopping center to remain very interactive and inclusive as best we can, and we'll specifIcally reach out to Mr. Brett in this process. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I did receive a lot of e-mails and comments, but all the rest of them were just generalities on how much they would like to see this center go forward, so I don't have any other specifIcs. Are there any other questions of the applicant at this time before we hear staff report? Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: I know that we haven't discussed the DCA yet, but number fIve says: At the time of rezoning, consideration shall be given to imposing appropriate restrictions on the amount of development allowed in this subdistrict prior to moving the fIre. Does that conflict in any way with what was in the DCA? Because the DCA essentially says you get it. And there's -- I'm not sure -- and again, I haven't seen the fInal DCA, so it makes it really hard to -- MR. HANCOCK: I let Mr. Anderson handle all the difficult questions. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. MR. ANDERSON: Typical planner. No, I don't think there's a conflict. This was inserted by staff as a general flag. I'll let them explain it or try to justify it. 9 16 I 1 B Sf -f COMMISSIONER CARON: It actually is probably more of a staff question at this point. MR. ANDERSON: Yeah. And we went along with them. I think the DCA is going to address the timing and those types of things. It would probably be just repeated in the zoning document. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. Because timing in that DCA was not available in the draft that I saw. A lot of timing issues that I think needed to be addressed, so -- MR. ANDERSON: Yeah, we have to coordinate it closely with when they start construction of the road and those types of things. Because we've made a commitment to the county that these buildings will be relocated before the road work really commences so that there's no downtime. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, that's good to hear. Because again, that was not readily ascertained from the draft DCA that I saw. And that would of course be a major concern for the people who live out there. MR. ANDERSON: Absolutely. COMMISSIONER CARON: And we have been caught in the past with agreements that were not specifIc enough with timing issues, and people have drug them on for 10 plus years before granting whatever they were supposed to have granted, so -- thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, we'll-- MR. ANDERSON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- go to staff report. MS. MOSCA: Good morning. For the record, my name is Michelle Mosca with the Comprehensive Planning staff. Commissioners, there have been several changes that have occurred since the Planning Commission's transmittal hearing that affects staff's evaluation of the petition. As you can probably recall, there were two commercial plan amendments proposed within the Estates that were withdrawn from the amendment cycle. Also, the commercial plan amendment proposed at Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevard was not transmitted to the state, it was continued indefInitely by the Board of County Commissioners so that it could appear on November's ballot, to give the voters an opportunity to make a decision whether or not they were in favor of the proj ect or not. And the third item is the subject petition was modifIed to add a commitment to provide a 35,000 square feet grocer within the fIrst 100,000 square feet of development. As a result of these changes, staff looked at the subject petition only when evaluating population and commercial supply and demand within the petitioner's market area. Based on this evaluation alone, staff can agree with the petitioner that there is a demand for neighborhood and community commercial within the petitioner's market area within the 1 O-year planning horizon. The subject project should be able to meet some of the Estates commercial demand. However, staff's recommendation today is the same as it was at transmittal. Staff does not support the adoption of this petition. Instead, staff recommends conducting a restudy of the Estates in context with the surrounding area. The community should be evaluated as a whole to determine the short and long-term needs for commercial and other non-residential uses. Regarding any new commercial centers, consideration should be given for their size, their acreage and building square feet, the location, the intensity of uses, types of commercial centers, whether or not it should be a neighborhood center, community center or regional center, and specifIc development standards. A restudy of the area would provide the community with an opportunity to voice their preferences. For example, it could be determined that a few smaller commercial centers able to accommodate a grocer and other neighborhood and community uses may be preferable to a large-scale project, such as the one proposed by this amendment. Smaller commercial centers strategically located throughout the Estates could provide more commercial opportunity to area residents proximate to their homes, thereby lessening the distance traveled to the shopping centers. Finally, as the commission is aware, the ORC Report contained two objections: One pertaining to the intensity and density of uses, and the other to transportation impacts. As Mr. Hancock stated, they are in fact in agreement with staff's revised text which appears in your 10 16 11 B 5 '., supplemental staff report. The only outstanding item is the transportation mitigation language, which I'll put on the visualizer. I think it's going to have to be cleaned up somewhat prior to consent, and then we'll report back to you at consent hearings. So let me put that on the visualizer and I'll read it into the record. There's been some additional changes. So it reads: Excluding the commercial zoning on Tract 71 and the existing approved commercial zoning on the east half of Tract 54, any additional commercial development in the subdistrict shall be developed in phases. Phase I shall be limited to 100,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Subsequent phases shall not receive building permits until the Randall Boulevard/hnmokalee Road intersection project, as shown in the Exhibit A below -- and we'll have to either include the Exhibit A within the subdistrict text or we'll have to somehow put that into some format, some text format to describe the exhibit has commenced. No certifIcates of occupancy for subsequent phases shall be issued until the project is substantially complete. So that's what we're proposing to add into the subdistrict text number seven, where there's a placeholder presently. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I want to clarify something, Michelle, you got into, which I was a bit surprised at. You seem to want to hold off any approvals for another restudy. The last restudy took two years. It was fInally approved through the process I believe in 2004, which is not that long ago, fIve, six years ago. And now you want to hold off any changes such as this one for that restudy to be complete, yet this one is consistent with the restudy. The intent of the restudy was always to have peripheral commercial along the main corridors, exactly how this one is being laid out. And I'm not sure what's gained by saying you want to have another restudy, unless it's to get another objective that has nothing to do with this particular project. So I don't believe that you need to dismiss the current restudy. It was done with all the community participating, the rooms were fIlled with people. Commercial was the most signifIcant issue ever discussed in that restudy. I was chairman of it for two years. And I can assure you that the commercial outcome of that was what the people at the time wanted. And over the last fIve years the demographics supposedly changes. They believe there's been an increase in population. But with all the foreclosures and the demise of population right now in Collier County, I would suggest that maybe we have a situation in Golden Gate Estates that's more similar to the way it was in 2003 and '04 today than it is (sic) say two years ago. So I'm not sure that you need to dismiss the restudy that was done, hoping for another restudy to have this thing done all over again when we've already said what we needed to say in that previous restudy. MS. MOSCA: And Mr. Chairman, I understand your comments. And I think from a staff perspective, it's more the intensity of the project rather than the location. We're talking roughly over 400 -- 402,000 square feet of commercial development at that area, at that intersection, that segment along Randall Boulevard to Eighth. We're talking about the relocation of the fIre district, the Division of Forestry to the -- it would be the east side of Eighth, which then you have new impacts, visual impacts, noise and so forth to those residents. It's really a matter of intensity, intensity of uses and the size of the center. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I think the intensity is in staying on the peripheral areas and the main thoroughfares, arterial roads, as predicted by the Golden Gate Master Plan study, follows the intent closely to that study. Now, as far as moving the government facilities, I just heard testimony they'd had to been moved anyway, so that's a moot point. I don't know what that has to do with this particular project. If anything, it's a favor to the project for having to get involved and doing the move, which would have -- leave it up to government, it probably would have cost the taxpayers a fortune. So I have - I think that's all a benefIt, not a negative. That's all I need to say on that. MS. MOSCA: Ijust wanted to address perhaps the impacts that it may have on the property owners in that area. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Before Mr. Anderson spoke of the requirement that they put in there that -- to satisfy the ORC Report that all buildings would have to be moved back to facilitate the construction of a road, I'm 11 o . L I () . . .. , h d mak . h d' ha dolO \, 1 B ~h I d hi Just CUrIOUS, Just lor t e recor to e certam t at we on t ve a contra IC n m any lOrm, WIt regar to t s particular phrase, this particular paragraph, I read the possibility here, no certifIcates of occupancy for the subsequent phases shall be issued until the project is substantially complete. So that means that the road must be substantially complete? MS. MOSCA: It's a segment of roadway. It's the intersection -- David, would you -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I want to be sure that we don't put them in a trap where we fInd ourselves in a circle. MS. MOSCA: Right. It's the intersection of Immokalee and Randall, and the segment of Randall to Eighth, I believe. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That's a big segment, isn't it? I mean, that's the whole project, isn't it, basically? MS. MOSCA: Yes. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So they're constrained to do 100,000 square feet initially. MS. MOSCA: That's correct. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: But Mr. Anderson indicated that they had to move the buildings back to facilitate the road. That's what I heard him say. Or maybe I misheard him. MS. MOSCA: I'll defer to Mr. Anderson. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I thought, Bruce, that you had said the buildings must be moved back. MR. ANDERSON: They do. They need to be relocated. But that won't need to be during Phase I. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So there's no impact on -- there's no impairment to the development and no impairment to the road one way or the other with that particular paragraph that they're looking to insert? MR. ANDERSON: No, I don't believe so, sir. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: All right, Ijust want to be absolutely sure. Because you know how these things go later on. MR. ANDERSON: Oh, believe me, I do. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Bruce, before you sit down, can we get your acknowledgment that you as the applicant's representative are accepting the paragraph proposed by staff? Or if you're not, I'd like to hear it. Let's get it on the table now. MR. ANDERSON: No, no, we're accepting of it as it's listed today. We reserve any rights to object to what fInally comes to you on consent. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, if it's different than what's here today. MR. ANDERSON: Yes, yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Michelle, would you at some point formalize that, clean it up and get it to each member bye-mail or otherwise so that we have it for our records? MS. MOSCA: Yes, I will. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else have any questions of the applicant or staff before we hear public speakers? Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Does that paragraph get the people what they want, which is that grocery store? I'm assuming that it relates back to three so that that's covered. MS. MOSCA: The subdistrict's text specifIcally states that a grocery store is required within the fIrst 100,000. It's not stated here. This language here will be inserted into the subdistrict text as number seven. And it appears on the second page. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay? Okay, anybody else before we go to public speakers? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, we'll start out with the registered public speakers, then I'll ask for general public speakers after that. So if you haven't registered, don't worry about it. David, you want to start with the -- MR. WEEKS: Sure. And Mr. Chairman, just let me put on the record, each of you planning commissioners did receive two anonymous letters of objection to this petition. 12 16 II I\( CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. And I didn't mention those, because if it's anonymous, that means my dog could have written it and I don't really put a lot of faith in my dog's opinions on these things, so -- MR. WEEKS: That would be impressive. Okay, sorry. Karen Aquard, followed by Pat Humphries. And those are your only two registered speakers. CHAIRMAN STRAIN : You can pull that mic down to you, Karen. There you go. By the way, we did swear in in the beginning -- MS. AQUARD: Oh, I'm sorry, I was late. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- I think some of you came in late. So anybody who came in late who wishes to testify on this petition, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (Speakers were duly sworn.) MS. AQUARD: Good morning, members of the Planning Commission. For the record, my name is Karen Aquard. Our home is located directly behind this proposed development. And once again, I have been asked by my neighbors to speak for the neighborhood. We are in favor still of this project going forward. I too was on the master plan from its inception to its sunset. Out of two years, I missed two meetings, and I want you to know, we met every other Wednesday for about four hours. This was a long commitment, it was a big commitment. And I don't know how staff can misinterpret our intentions, but I can tell you for certain that this development meets the intent of what the public told us they wanted and what we intended to put in the master plan. Yes, things are changing out there. You have tons of foreclosures. This is not the time to do a new master plan. Things need to become more stable before a new one is done. The other thing that staff does not understand or realize is that when you live in the Estates, one of the biggest problems is getting quality commercial and services out there. It took us 10 years to get a mini Walgreen's. And this is because the big corporate offices in Chicago and Atlanta and New York cannot comprehend the idea of estate-sized lots, and almost 200 square miles where the smallest lot is one a quarter acres and they can go up to 15 or more. They don't comprehend it. They count rooftops. This commercial development is our primary way of getting quality commercial out there. Because with Waterways, Citrus Greens, Valencia Lakes and Orangetree, the bean counters can count their rooftops and they'll be happy to come to Randall Boulevard. And it won't be all just little moms and pops that are failing over on the corner of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevard. That one is mostly empty. This is the rooftop demographics that the big businesses want. And this is our chance to get it. As they stated, Emergent is working with the residents, so it will be what we want. And I wish to point out in the end here, it will be a shot in the arm for the economy -- for the county, but basically for that area. You're talking road construction, you're talking building construction and you're talking with offices, restaurants and stores, you are talking hundreds of jobs that will come into that area. Yes, it's going to cut down on trips into town and everything else. It's just -- this whole package, I urge you to pass this forward, because I see it as a home run, a touch down and the checkered flag all rolled into one. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, Karen. Pat? Good morning. MS. HUMPHRIES: Good morning. My name is Pat Humphries. I'm presently on the board for the Homeowners Association of Golden Gate Estates and f0rmerly on the board for the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association. Today I'm speaking for myself. I am in favor of this proposed shopping center, because it fulfIll a long awaited need for a grocery store and retail shops in the Estates. Because this shopping center is located in the peripheral area of the Estates, it will serve the residents without impacting the rural character of the community. The shopping center is located at the intersection of Immokalee Road, a six-lane highway, and Randall Boulevard, a soon to be six-lane highway. It will be in close proximity to three residential developments known as Orangetree, Waterways and Valencia, as well as approved commercial property north of Randall Boulevard on Immokalee Road. This location will be a magnet to attract quality retailers. I think this project would be a positive addition to Golden Gate Estates. Thank you. 13 . .} I \ .,..' .l 16 ita 5. ~ CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Next speaker, David? MR. WEEKS: There are no more registered speaks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, I know there's others that want to speak. If you don't mind coming up to this podium one at a time, whoever wants to come fIrst, you're more than welcome to. MR. OLMEDA: For the record, my name is Frank Olmeda, and I live at the Valencia Golf and CountrycIub. THE COURT REPORTER: Could you spell Olmeda, please? MR. OLMEDA: O-L-M-E-D-A. Gentlemen and ladies, I live at the Valencia Golf and Countryclub, which is right next to -- right on Randall Boulevard, and will be very close to the proposed commercial development. Personally my wife and I are in full support of this development. And in addition to that, I am also the chair of the advisory committee for the association. I have spoken to the majority ofthe residents and they have -- they are all in favor of the proposal. It's something that is needed by the community and very much supported by the community. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. Next person, please, whoever would like to speak? I saw two other -- if you don't want to, that's fIne. (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, with that, we will I guess not quite close and see ifthere's any fInal statements by Bruce. None. Anybody from Planning Commission have any questions? Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, I just want to go back to the draft DCA. And that's not really been discussed at all here today and I think it should be. I'm concerned -- again, I will state that I'm concerned about milestones being addressed in this DCA. For example, let's just pick something out, that it says under county emergency management services commitments. It says: The developer has entered into an option to purchase this swap parcel. But it doesn't say when he has to do this. There's no deadline. And I'm concerned that this draft is in really rough form for us to be looking at it. MS. MOSCA: Commissioner, my understanding is that the DCA is a work in progress. It's not near completion, but will be complete by the July 28th BCC adoption hearing. Unfortunately it's not complete at this time. And I'll defer to Bruce Anderson, ifhe wants to comment about the DCA further. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before you do, Michelle, didn't I -- based on the paragraph that you have here, in testimony I thought I heard earlier, the swap parcels and the moving of the fIre service and the rest of them I believe have to be done before the road work can be completed; is that right? MS. MOSCA: That's what I heard as well, correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So if this paragraph survives, which I imagine it would, then the concerns that Ms. Caron has over the phasing and the timing of those other issues would all have to fall in place in order for them to get past Phase I by the intent of this paragraph, because you couldn't put the road in without it? Is that a fair statement? MS. MOSCA: I believe it is a fair statement. Hopefully it will be restated in the DCA that way. Hopefully the DCA -- COMMISSIONER CARON: If it needs to be -- MS. MOSCA: -- will be revised to reflect-- COMMISSIONER CARON: -- stated in the DCA that way. Because as we know, we have, A, had DCA's fail on multiple occasions in this county. And C (sic), we've had other instances where when we didn't put milestones in for people to reach that they just didn't do it or they will hold off for as long as possible. Because suddenly they don't have to have the money to do this or suddenly they don't have -- you know, they're holding it up because they think they can get something else out of the deal if they hold over our heads the fact that, you know, they're supposed to do this other thing that we would like them to do. I'm very concerned about the way these DCA's have been coming forward and that the county is not caught in a bind that it doesn't want to be caught in, and the people as a result, so -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ifwe recommend adoption with this phase, it forces the issue to be addressed and the DCA would have to come out consistent with the GMP A language, which is in front of us. So it's almost a trap to 14 16 11 B 5 I make sure the DCA comes out right, the way I'm reading this. MS. MOSCA: That's correct. I mean, the additional language that will be included in the subdistrict as number seven, that's intended to protect the county in terms of the roadway construction, the intersection improvements and so forth in the phasing of the project. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else have any questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, is there a motion from the Planning Commission? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll-- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So moved. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: -- make it again. I move we move Petition CP-2008-2 as modifIed with a recommendation of approved. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay-- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- Mr. Murray, will that be a second okay with you? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yes, I did, I seconded it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I'm assuming the motion maker and the second are including the paragraph that's in front of us and the other couple of small strike-throughs that were outlined to us by I think the applicant? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: All the modifIcations presented. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: All of them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Heidi? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Mr. Chair, could we clarify that you're approving the version that is on Page 4 of the supplemental staff report of June 15th, which is the subdistrict text as revised by petitioner at adoption and further revised by staff, and that is further modifIed -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Today. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Today. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: -- today? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. And that's kind of-- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- where I was trying to go. But that's said much better, so -- does the motion maker and second accept that clarifIcation? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Agreed. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Yes, I do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 8-0, unanimously. Thank you very much. I think it's going to be an asset to the Estates when you fInally get this done. Now the hard part comes dealing with the rest of the issues you've got to go through. ***Let's see, with that we'll move into our next item on the agenda. It's CP-2008-4. It's a Future Land Use Map amendment for the sending lands to neutral lands property in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use district down by the county landfIll. 15 \ .~ "'". \ ~ 16 11 B 5 ~ All these wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (Speakers were duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Disclosures on the part of the Planning Commission? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I spoke briefly to Mr. Ramsey, and anything -- we'll be talking about the project as we go forward. Go ahead, Mr. Nadeau. MR. NADEAU: Good morning, Commissioners. For the record, Dwight Nadeau, Planning Manager for RW A, representing the Filmore Recycling GMP Amendment CP-2008-4. The subject property, as you recall from our transmittal hearings -- and by the way, good morning, Commissioner Ahern. Welcome aboard. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Thank you. MR. NADEAU: This subject property is approximately 29 acres, located offWashbum Road in Section 31, Township 49, Range 27 east. It's directly adjacent to landfIll. In very -- in brief, the petition was to change the future land use designation from sending lands to neutral lands in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use district to provide for operation of a construction and demolition debris which would be the receiving of construction/demolition materials, the processing of crushing, and then the transfer of those process materials off-site to a qualified receiver of these materials. We successfully went through the Environmental Advisory Council, the Planning Commission, as well as the Board of County Commissioners through the transmittal process, and each and every advisory board and the Board of County Commissioners recommended and did transmit this amendment unanimously. Subsequent to that we received the ORC Report from DCA and there was an objection related to transportation. It was mostly associated with all of those land uses that could have been permitted by the sending designation. On April 30th, I provided a response and rebuttal document to the DCA wherein we addressed their concerns. We had our environmen -- our transportation consultant address the transportation issues. And subsequently received an e-mail from Mr. Massey at FDOT withdrawing his objections to the proposed amendment. Now, prior to the Environmental Advisory Council, I made a call to DCA to see if their concerns had been completely resolved. And I spoke with Brenda Winningham up at the DCA who was speaking for Mike McDaniel. She said that they didn't have really too much of a problem with what the intent was, but it may have been precedential if we were going to do a map change. So we went to the Environmental Advisory Council on June 2nd and we did receive a unanimous recommendation to adopt to the Board of County Commissioners. Subsequent to that meeting, staff has had an opportunity to discuss the precedential matters with DCA, Brenda Winningham, and they were trying to fmd an alternative solution to just providing for a map change to change the designation. And what staff and DCA have come up with is an exception within the sending lands portion of the Future Land Use Element where a similar exception for conditional use is being provided for, and it is similar to that being utilized by Collier County for their solid waste park that's currently in process with their conditional use. So staff has provided you with language as a supplement to your staff report for this adoption hearing, and I can read it into the record, or if it's familiar to you all, the client -- the applicant has no objection to the language as proposed. They understand that there will not be a map change, that this property will remain a sending designation. Even though it has passed the test of providing compelling evidence that it may not meet the defInitions of what a sending designation may be, the end result is that they want to have the opportunity to do the construction and demolition debris processing and transfer opportunity, land use opportunity, and this can be accommodated through this amendment. For the record, I would like to ask the Assistant County Attorney if she fInds that the proposed language of staffs adequately addresses the request of the Growth Management Plan amendment petition wherein construction and demolition processing and transfer will be permitted, utilizing this language, or if you feel there may be a need to add the term processing -- including processing and transfer of construction and demolition debris, which would make it a little bit more clearer in that language. 16 . I 16Jlti5 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Before you put the County Attorney's Office on the spot-- Have you had time to review these proposals with staff in regards to this conditional use and all the parameters of that before today's hearing? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: I received the amendment the same time that you did, which was I think late last night, so I haven't been able to review it in the context of the current GMP and then what the amendment is proposing. In answer to Dwight's question, I believe the language he was relying on in requesting this sending designation change was the language in our GMP under sending lands section, and which says facilities for the collection, transfer, processing and reduction of solid waste. So to the extent that he was relying on this section in the sending lands, the placement of it under the conditional use under the -- MR. NADEAU: Neutral lands. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Did I misspeak? MR. NADEAU: Under the neutral lands. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Under the neutral lands will accomplish what he was attempting to do through the sending lands, with the exception that it requires a conditional use. MR. NADEAU: And the conditional use would have been required in either case if this Growth Management Plan were adopted. MS. ASHTON: I can't answer that question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And that was my question. And I wouldn't be asking it of you, I'd probably be asking it of staff. Because if your whole intention was to move from sending to neutral, in neutral is the use that you have a permitted use by right, or does it still require a conditional use? MR. WEEKS: Still require a conditional use. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, so they're no worse off than if they abort this process to use the language that is being proposed, more or less, they're no worse off than if they'd gone forward. They still need a 4-0 vote or four-vote at least going through another process, another step all over again. MR. WEEKS: That's correct. The difference in the proposed text versus changing the designation to neutral is they will be limited to this one additional use only. That is the only additional use eligible for the property. If it's changed -- the designation is changed to neutral, then that opens up a variety of other uses in addition to this one. For example, a church or day care center or various other uses allowed in neutral. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And Dwight, how does your applicant feel about this change? MR. NADEAU: We feel that it's going to achieve the end result. We would just like certainty that what we're proposing is being accommodated in this language. It is my opinion that it does. It may need the inclusion of reference to construction and demolition debris, but if I can get assurances from the county that we've followed the process and that the language being proposed is appropriate going through this Growth Management Plan amendment today and hopefully with -- on July 28th with the Board of County Commissioners, we're absolutely satisfIed. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: David? MR. WEEKS: I was going to suggest this: These amendments will come back to you on July 1st for consent hearing, consent review, so we have a little bit of time. As long as the intent is clear. Dwight has made it very clear what his intent from his applicant's perspective is. Staff is in agreement with that. That would give us additional time to consult with the County Attorney's Office as to whether we need to tweak the language further. But as long as we're very clear on the intent, then leave it up to staff to fIgure out the exact wording we need and present that to you on July 1st. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, before we go to Heidi, the only concern I would have is if somehow it doesn't work, we're not allowed to vote and change our motion on consent. And so I'm wondering if that's the best timing. Maybe we ought to be looking at discussing this to make sure you've made acceptable progress at our next regular Planning Commission meeting at the end of this month. MR. WEEKS: That's another option. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Or I guess there's another one. MR. WEEKS: In two days. COMMISSIONER CARON: We can do it in two days. 17 ).. I , 16 1185~ CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If they can work it out in two days. Heidi? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: I just have an additional comment for the record, since Mr. Nadeau asked me a direct question. This amendment is a little bit different in that it restricts it to existing uses, and I don't know that the prior amendment shifting it -- you know, the designation would have restricted it to existing uses. So thank you for letting me state that on the record. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I think that they acknowledged it would -- the prior amendment would go beyond the existing uses. This would limit it to existing uses, and they seem to be satisfIed with that. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Right. But the prior one would have allowed an expansion of the existing use, and I just wanted to state that for the record, since he asked me the question directly. MR. NADEAU: Well, if! may respond-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure, go ahead. MR. NADEAU: -- Mr. Chairman. While there would be an exception of land use opportunity, there would be no expansion of facilities on the property that would encroach into any existing permitted conservation areas or the like. So the mulching, horticultural mulching operations that are currently permitted by the conditional use previously approved in the sending designation, they would continue in operation. It would be the expansion of those mulching operations to include the construction and demolition debris receiving, processing and transfer that would be added as a permitted conditional use exception within the sending lands designation of the RFMUD. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Corby, looks like maybe you can contribute to this? Let's hope. MR. SCHMIDT: Thank you. For the record, Corby Schmidt with the Comprehensive Planning Section. Just on this idea alone, the language previously in the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, along with what's in front of you today, is viewed as a larger set of possible uses. The phraseology is existing in the FLUE for those facilities for resource recovery, and another listing for the collection, transfer, processing and reduction of solid waste. That's a bigger umbrella term or set of terms than is demolition and construction debris. A smaller set of uses or a more limited kind of use. So we don't have a problem with the interpretation meaning that it includes those items, because as the previous proposal, it did, and it still wound. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. With that in mind, Heidi, if you and Corby and David were able to get together in the next couple days and we continued a decision on this till our Thursday meeting after we fInish this, we're probably going to spend a half a day Thursday, maybe fIve hours, and we can fInish up with this in the afternoon, wrap it up and make sure that everybody's on the same page. And if not, look at alternatives and go forward. Does that work for you, Heidi? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Yes, it does. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Corby? David? MR. WEEKS: That's fIne. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Dwight, is that okay with your team? MR. NADEAU: Yes, absolutely. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So let's just get -- air all the other questions or concerns we have now about this. But I think we're going to hold a decision offuntil Thursday, and we'll listen to any public speakers that are here today. So with that in mind, if the applicant is fInished with his presentation, I'll ask for any further staff comments before we go into Planning Commission comments. David, do you have anything? Or Corby? Anything else. MR. SCHMIDT: Sure. Perhaps just a few more comments. Mr. Nadeau covered all the bases quite well. Just to add to the presentation a bit, the Department of Community Affairs did have a continuing concern with the proposal as previously proposed. And it was the subject of one of their objections in the ORC Report. They had concern with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District designation as a whole, the integrity of the program in its entirety, and that beginning to make small individual changes, as this one would have been, that there 18 16l1B5;1 would be no protection from a continuation of that, a continued eroding of the program. With the change that you see in front of you now, it does eliminate that possibility. Instead of redesignating one kind of land, sending in this case, to neutral, this simply fmds a place, a niche in the sending lands themselves with no redesignation, which will allow the continuation of this existing use and the expansion of uses on the property within the confmes of the boundaries to the satisfaction of the applicants. Now you've already gone over the language that's being proposed. You have a hand-out that states that in front of you. We looked a bit further ahead to make sure that the language worked. And I mentioned just a moment ago that generally it does. But should this be adopted and that conditional use would be asked for, in the agricultural rural designations under which the sending lands FLUE designation falls, the LDC's entry for this kind of use, the conditional use being asked for, would be the collection and transfer sites for resource recovery. And within that, we've already heard testimony previously and today as well that that construction and demolition debris would be the single use being asked for in that expansion. And your second bite at the apple, that conditional use hearing, or that consideration, would be that chance to limit this even further. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, thank you. Are there any questions of either staff or the applicant at this time? Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, this whole business of further encroaching and further encroaching I brought up in the initial round. And I think that this makes it better. But does -- this exception in sending, is that going to allow other people to say -- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: It's precedential. COMMISSIONER CARON: -- yeah, I now have a precedent because you did it for Section 31, why can't an exception to made for me over here in Section 93 or whatever. MR. SCHMIDT: I think that remains a possibility, just like it did to these applicants. Which is why staff was very careful to craft the wording so we're looking at existing uses out there that have previous approval. This was a provisional use, when that's what conditional uses were called. And it also predates the creation of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. And we're trying to write in some of that history into that language. So if there are other examples that may come along, the suspicion was there would be few. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay, was that the assurance I got before. I'm hoping that that's still true. MR. WEEKS: I'd like to add to that, Mr. Chairman. As this Commission will recall, the county's position collectively, both staff, the Planning Commission and ultimately the board in adopting the rural fringe amendments, I believe has been very consistent in what we referred to as not wanting the Swiss cheese concept. We want the sending lands to be a continuous block, not containing holes in the cheese that allow higher designations; that is, not having sending and/or receiving designations within. That that would be incompatible to have higher intensity uses within the interior of the sending land. Conversely, we've consistently said it's okay to nibble at the edges, you know, if -- and specifIcally you might recall there was a provision with the original adoption in 2002 that allowed landowners to come in that were -- had property on the edge of the sending land that was abutting receiving or neutral lands to submit materials to the county to demonstrate Collier County, you made a mistake, my property should not be designated sending lands; here's my evidence. And then through that process in fact some properties did have their designation changed. If we look at the Future Land Use Map for the subject site, notwithstanding the fact that the landfIll abuts this property to the west, the landfIll is designated sending. So this property is a small hole in the cheese. So that to support the redesignation would seemingly, and I would have to say it is, a departure from that consistent position of don't create a hole in the cheese or a hole in the doughnut. By carving out this text provision, the map itself maintains its integrity. And that might seem like semantics, okay, leave the map alone but go change the text. The difference here, number one, is as Corby's already pointed it out, it's limited to a pre-approved use on the property. How many other properties can make that same argument. Secondly, this property is adjacent to the landfIll, and its uses are complementary to the landfIll. There's an existing exception right now in the future land use element in the sending lands on the same page 19 ........ 16 11 8'S ~ of the text that you have provided to you today. It's number 8.A.2, and that's for the county owned property in Section 25. It allows similar uses and even more than the type of use being discussed today. So an exception is already there for a similar type use also complementary to the landfIll. So this is, in my view, an extension of that. You know, it's applying the same type of rationale to another property. That's the reason and I would say the only reason for that collective analysis and rationale for why staff would support this change. COMMISSIONER CARON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, are there any other questions of staff or the applicant before we seek any public speakers? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Were there any registered public speakers, David? MR. WEEKS: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody from the public wish to speak on this item? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. What I think we're looking for then is a continuation to vote on this particular item at our Thursday, June 17th meeting after our regular meeting. Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Move to continue. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray made a motion to continue. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER CARON: Second. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: I'll second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Second by Mr. Vigliotti. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 8-0. Okay, this one will be continued to Thursday afternoon, or I should say Thursday when we fInish our regular agenda. But it looks like it'd be in the afternoon. I'd like to suggest to staff and the applicant, we don't need a representation of everything, just focus on the issue that is being -- it's being continued for, the one paragraph, we get our business done at that time and be done with it. MR. SCHMIDT: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. And let's take a break. We'll come back at 10:05. (Recess.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, David? MR. WEEKS: Okay, if everybody will please take your seats, we'll go ahead and resume our meeting. We have two items left on the agenda. ***The next one up is absolutely the most difficult one we could ever approach. It's a proposal by staff. It's CPSP-2008-7. Staffs requesting a change to the Future Land Use Element to align some policies in the GMP. Is there a motion? COMMISSIONER CARON: Motion to approve. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Commissioner Caron. Seconded by? COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: (Indicating.) 20 , . , 16' lBi CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Vigliotti. Is there any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those if favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 8-0. David, if you bring in those more difficult ones forward like that again, I don't know how we're going to fmd the time to deal with them. ***Now, let's move on to CP-2009-l. This is a Future Land Use Element map change. It's for the Dade/Collier Cypress Recreation Area District. It's a conservation designation. It's located near the Miami/DadeJDade Collier County border. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (Speakers were duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, are there disclosures on the part of the Planning Commission? Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: I spoke to Nicole Ryan of The Conservancy. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And so did I. Anybody else? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Also. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney did too. Okay, that in mind, gentlemen it's all yours. MR. ASHER: For the record, my name is Kevin Asher, representing the applicant, Miami-Dade County. I'm accompanied by Andrew Paul, also with Miami-Dade County. The amendment before you is the Dade/Collier Cypress Recreation Area. The last time you heard it and this time it hasn't substantially changed. At its heart it is an amendment to permit a transition from airport use to a recreation use. And the specifIc part of the amendment is to permit an area already allowable as passive recreational uses to include - some of which include motorized use to include passive motorized recreational use. So at its heart it's a very simple amendment. The amendment has gone through the transmittal phases. It went to DCA. DCA came back with a very lengthy report that included a variety of comments, recommendations and objections. After speaking with -- the applicant spoke with DCA staff and those staff who provided input to DCA because we were kind of concerned and surprised at the extent of some of the comments and the objections from DCA on a transition from an airport to a recreational use, from an area that does not protect natural resources to an area that does protect natural resources. So I wanted to go through kind of in a little more detailed manner to discuss some of their objections. And specifIcally their objections, because their recommendations and comments are -- do not have a bearing, as David has said. So that kind of helps you further understand it. And I wanted to address specifIcally where the amendment -- where the applicant is recommending that the amendment be changed to specifIcally or fully comply with DCA concerns, after having talked to them and fathomed out some of their issues. So I'd like to go through very quickly some of their concerns. I have a board here that Andy will turn the pages. So there was a concern. One of the initial concerns of DCA was that this area did not support environmental -- it wasn't environmentally suitable for the amendment. And we were kind of curious about that. Because right now 21 16 j 1 Bp ~ the entirety of the property, as you see here -- Andy, I'll handle that -- the entirety of the property is an airport for aviation purposes, which uses buffer lands only as a means to protect the integrity of the runway. This amendment very clearly transitions it from aviation use to park and recreation use, relying on the passive intact natural areas as the basis of the park use. So we were a little cautious about that. The second one was that the -- they were also concerned about the issue that some of the uses were nonconforming. And again, the uses that they were concerned -- remember that the existing uses permitted on the property are a variety of recreational uses, passive recreational use for camping, hunting, fIshing, so on and so forth, and those ancillary uses. Now, at present -- Andy, you got it? Go to the next page, if you would. At present the existing uses are no different than the uses that have been taking place on that property for the last 70 years; essentially gladesmens activities in terms of hunting and fIshing and camping. Access to any of those includes swamp buggies and a whole array of things that our application proposes to eliminate or mitigate. For example, we -- as you may recall, in this particular area we would eliminate swamp buggy uses because we believe it's adverse. We would eliminate hunting because we believe it's inconsistent to have a recreational park that allows hunting. There's kind of an inconsistency there. We would eliminate sport camps. And many of them are mobile homes that are pulled in there, or long-term; some of them have been there 50 years or so. Nevertheless, on the southern part of this property -- remember this property is 24,000 acres and is an outparcel of Big Cypress National Preserve, fully owned by the county, operated by the county as an airport, not subject to the National Park Service, although we do partner with them in order to essentially try to coordinate land use issues and natural resource issues. But it is not part of Big Cypress, not subject to their governance. However, I think it's important to understand that this amendment brings this property far closer to the compliance and the defInition of the conservation designation area than does leaving it as an airport. The state was also concerned that the amendment does not establish kind of appropriate guidelines for some of the uses. And in fact, much of the text we have here in the existing amendment does in fact provide that there's going to be an adaptive management plan for the property. But a land use plan is not the appropriate context to provide a 20-page detailed guideline of policies. In fact, it was our premise and that of staff that the more detailed management plans, as in the guidelines and policies, that would be adapted and adopted for this property would be in what's called an adaptive management plan, not unlike what Big Cypress has. Big Cypress has an adaptive management plan which prescribes the type of uses, where they are, the capacity of those uses and the governance of them. So we would in a sense mimic what the federal government has already successfully developed and used. And I've already provided for that in the language. However, we are not above making some minor changes to this to essentially abide by the more explicit language that DCA has proposed in terms of consenting that we will have guiding policies, standards and/or policies that detail it more fully. So I think that we will provide that to staff. And again, we didn't have the markup here, but that's -- it's unfortunate that we're not able to provide it today, but in our response we did allude to what it is. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Sir, when you speak of staff -- sir, when you're speaking of staff, whose staff are you referring to, DCA's? MR. ASHER: In some areas we have spoken to DCA staff and those staff from respective agencies, DOT, fish & Wildlife, DEP, even down to the Corps of Engineers. Because there were comments. The -- remember, DCA depends fully on regulatory staff reviews. Some of those were either misinformed or misguided. And some of that I'll touch on. So we wanted to kind of drill down. We know Ray Eubanks and Brenda Winningham, and so we were kind of a little bit surprised. I mean, I'm a planner and I comment on compo plans in Miami-Dade County. So we were a little surprised at, how should I say, the vigor at which DCA objected to a transition of an airport on a sensitive natural area to a park that would manage the natural resources on that same area. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Let me just interrupt you. Because what I was trying to ascertain, and especially since you made the statement that you're referring to all kinds of staff, would you be good enough hereafter to refer to which particular staff you are relating to when you say staff? 22 i i .j MR. ASHER: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Thank you. MR. ASHER: Thank you. If you don't mind, I'm going to -- does this work? I'm going to use this one over here. The next area, the next objection that the state culled up was that the applicant did not establish appropriate guidelines to protect the wetlands. And some of these were for areas of critical state concern, others were for intact natural areas. And I think the most telling of this was that the state took exception to the specifIc wording for the area of critical state concern. And that means that although this area is not in the Big Cypress National Preserve, it is in an overlay area the state manages that has even higher thresholds for development and protection. The one item that they took exception was that the language relating to saltwater grasses and marshes was taken out. Now, in fact, the applicant never took out that language, it was Collier County staff at a later time who excerpted that language. And we didn't object. But at the same time, if state DCA has a concern that the area of critical state concern guidelines fully and completely apply to this property, then we are fully in agreement with it. There is no expectation on our part that it would abide by any less restrictions. In fact, we went through with the coordinator, Rebecca Jetton, who is the State -- DEP coordinator for critical state concerns. And went through it and described that there is not any area of the state statutes governing areas of critical state concern that this project cannot comply with. First and foremost is that not more than 10 percent of the property be used. In fact, in this particular development, as we presented last time, the developed areas of this project are focused solely on already impacted areas. Remember, this area was developed in '69 as an ancillary area. There were lakes quarried. there were areas that were paved. and nature's not going to grow back in some of these areas. So there are probably about 140 acres or so of heavily impacted areas. Notwithstanding the lakes. This is just areas around the lakes and fIlled areas. And we will be occupying a small portion of that area. At the same time, the project committed itself not only to using impacted areas but to restoring others. Last time we showed a plan whereby there were about 45 acres of existing trails on the property. It is our intent to reduce that by over half; in other words, to eliminate certain non-conducive (sic) trails, trails that are in sensitive areas. And then of that half amount, one-half would go to pedestrian areas and one-half would go to motorized trails. Because remember that there is an intention to have a diverse array of recreational areas and kind of family off-road vehicles in speed-controlled trails, as was presented before, has been an important part of this. In fact, that was one of the basis for looking for property like this, since all of the adjacent land uses to this property already permit off-highway vehicle use, particularly in the over 800,000-acre Big Cypress National Preserve. Again, the State took exception to the language not having enough defInition, or suggesting that we would establish meaningful predictable guidelines and standards to assure that groundwire disturbances are voided, that trails are governed, that people stay on the trails, surface water. We have no objection to a very minor modifIcation to the existing text to comply with the state's request, such that we would provide those meaningful guidelines and practices in the adaptive management plan, which would then be part of zoning and a site plan, such that it would comply not only with state -- with Florida Administrative Code, but it would comply with the area of critical state concern. It has always been the Miami-Dade County's expectation and Collier County, since they're essentially a partner in this, in trying to address not only the level of demand for OHV's in this area, but to do so on this property in a way that doesn't adversely impact resources. At present the property is used solely as buffer land. And there are permitted uses that as a park and recreation department we would just as soon see go away. And I think through kind of a partnership between counties, we can look at adapting this property in a way that meets both state's concerns and county I guess objectives. Andy, you can go on. One of the objections or concerns raised by the state had to do with -- this is fIve, Andy -- had to do with the CERP project, the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Program. The idea that one of the program -- one of the programs, or one of the projects was to eliminate the L28 canal. This is a canal that is just on the -- you see it there, Andy? 16 11 a 5 .j 23 ~ . " 16118S The comprehensive Everglades restoration plan proposes a number of measures to the Everglades area to decentralize water. One of them is to remove the L28 canal. That is a levy on the east side of this project. And the state's concern was that an area that is already wet will become even wetter, as in the area will have less and less recreation time open to residents. Well, in fact the county, Miami-Dade County is a partner in the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force. We sit with the feds, we sit with state in managing the Everglades restoration, as does I think there are Collier County representatives on it. We are well aware of the project. And in fact in our application we suggested that there was going to be a management plan governed by hydroperiods. At very high times we already knew that certain recreational activities could not take place. At very low water times, when it's very dry, certain recreational activities could not take place. But during the rest of the year you can adequately manage and supervise certain activities. If the water is deep, you can still go fIshing. They're -- much of the uplands are accessible but you may not be doing any off-road vehicles, you may not be doing any trail rides. Having said that, our department already is programming this property. We run Everglades Trails and Swamp Tromps through here that originate from Miami-Dade County. They're relatively popular. And they go about once every two and a half months. And not unlike what goes on in your area, that people want to visit the Everglades. Even though they live very close to it, sometimes it takes a guided tour, a type of a program to provide them a type access and understanding. MR. PAUL: The visual you're seeing here is our -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sir, you can't speak unless you use the microphone, so please grab a mic if you're going to say anything. Thank you. MR. ASHER: Another area that the state was concerned about were the lakes. And this was a topic of conversation the last time we spoke. The quarry lakes on the property were dredged in 1969. They were dredged to acquire fIll for the runway. As a runway, the elevations of the profIle of the lake edges are one-to-one or one-to-two. So in other words, they're very severe. They were dredged and maintained specifIcally to avoid allowing migratory wading birds to have shoreline access and then to conflict with aviation purposes. This airport as an active airport is governed by FAA in its circulars, which prohibit or eliminate wading birds. So there is a conflict at least that the state thought that any type of development would trigger a modifIcation of the lake edges. But in fact that's not necessarily true, because the same state -- Florida Administrative Code that suggests that development needs to modify it allows for grandfathering provisions for lakes that were in existence prior to or are governed by other federal statutes. So there is not a true issue that there is a requirement to modify or feather the lake edges on this property. They can coexist. You can have lake edges like that adjacent to an airport and can still function very well in support of fIshing or a whole host of recreational activities and be done so in a very safe manner. Another one of the concerns of the state was for stormwater and sewage disposal. We had proposed in the application to use on-site septic tank, which is not unlike what the airport uses now, what the National Park Service next door uses, what the Miccosukee Indians use right next door, because there are seven new housing developments for Miccosukees, the Trail Indians. Having said that, as a proposed amendment, during the evaluation process for site plan and zoning we fmd that septic is not a viable and environmentally acceptable way, the applicant is open to using a holding tank that would be completely compliant with DCA's concerns and Florida Administrative Code. So again, these are issues that normally are dealt with in zoning and site planning, not in land use. It seems a little detailed. But having said that, the applicant is not opposed to including any language that would make us more open to any environmentally friendly or environmentally appropriate stormwater and sewage disposal. Another one of the concerns, and this is a curious one, was that the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the economic policies of Collier County, ones that encourage the preservation of sensitive natural areas and other things that preserve unique natural resources. Well, in our mind what would preserve this property more than transitioning it to a recreational and park 24 16 , 1 B 5 .- setting, one whose management and natural area's approach would certainly be more consistent with aviation use which essentially uses it as buffer land, which it sometimes is subject to trespassing and other shall I say adverse uses. So I think in this particular case the amendment is clearly and demonstratively supportive of many or most Collier County GMP objectives. The fIrst and foremost is the preservation of the intact natural resources. One of the -- it wasn't an objection, but one that I wanted to touch on, there was a recommendation by the state that the applicant revisit the alternative sites for this project. And this was premised on that the county, Miami-Dade County, had done a feasibility study in looking at available sites within Miami-Dade County that could support this type of wilderness park, inclusive of off-highway vehicles. Collier County had done a similar approach to look at available locations because of course Collier County has been confronting the very same high demand and low supply of available locations. For all practical purposes at this particular time Miami-Dade County has not found another more suitable location as in a publicly owned proximate area that has a history of motorized use on the property. Absent that, the county did not have the funds to buy another property or to force or condemn a privately owned land, or to fInd other property that had even -- some of them had even more environmental issues. We went so far as to talk with the Division of Forestry. Division of Forestry is the state entity that manages off-highway vehicles. The state has been an active partner with us. In fact, the county, Miami-Dade County has received three Mark Schmidt grants to look at both the feasibility of an OHV location and to look at the planning and design process for defming what that is. Miami-Dade County is the only county to have received three consecutive grants in partnership with them. The state has submitted a letter that they are entirely supportive of this property. If there is another alternative, they're not opposed to considering it. But this time it's the only one on the table. This property, because we have largely restricted the amount of areas where OHV's can go, it's not going to fully solve the problem. Andy, would you turn to number 11. The magnitude of the demand in these counties, both in Miami-Dade County and in Collier County, is such that you have like 12,000 titled vehicle riders. Next one, Andy. It's the next one, it's the map of the two counties. Right there. Over 12,000 vehicle riders in Miami-Dade County and almost 6,000 in Collier County. This one location is not going to solve it. And in fact there is no intention to provide for all types of uses. This is a very family oriented nature trial type of location that is designed to be restrictive both in speed and location. We consent from the onset, even among our best friends and whether it's trail-riders or nature walkers, this is not going to solve everyone's problem. It simply is not. It is one part of a larger piece of the puzzle. The state also brought up the issue that this project was potentially an expansion of urban services into a non-urban area. And the idea that it was going to require additional law enforcement and emergency rescue, there wasn't telephone support, and yet when we talked with the individuals who had reviewed it, they were, let's say, I think maybe surprised that in fact Collier County's Emergency Services -- this is number 13, Andy - Collier County Emergency Services had already reviewed the property. They had not recommended or not identifIed that there were any serious problems. Collier County Sheriff had reviewed the project. In fact, they're one of the supporting letters in this. And it goes on and on. Even at the extent that there were issues about cellular service. Well, wow, it's a wilderness location; we fully expect that not all cellular services (sic). When we go out to measure it, we fmd that Verizon is out there, T-Mobile is out there, AT&T. If you have Metro PCS, you may be out ofluck. But having said that, it's very accessible. Communication is there, and the extent to which an extension of urban services support is minimal. Now, we have recommended that as management takes over the property, we'll provide certain fIrst responder type of things. But I'm not certain that we are as apprehensive as the state in terms of their concern about urban services. One of the very last ones, there was an issue that has come up or begun to come up about carbon emissions, people having to come all the distance. Well, in fact right now people who legally go to OHV's have to go to central Florida or far western, as in northern from here, distances far greater than if they trespass in Miami-Dade County and illegally occupy environmental areas or farming areas. So we actually did the very fIrst scientifIc analysis of the project and we used the software recommended by 25 .... I .1 16 J 1 B.~ .~ the state to the extent that there was a demonstrated reduction in the project location by probably tenfold, meaning that individuals having to come 50 miles from Miami to this area or Collier to the same area, there was a true and measurable reduction in carbon emissions, greenhouse gas emission to this site. I mean, it's just -- again, it's not going to solve everything, but it will provide the beginning point of the solution to the high demand and low supply ofOHV areas. With that, I'm going to stop and allow additional questions, but to suggest that we will provide a -- based on the information that we submitted to staff, as in David Weeks and company, in our larger response, we will supply a markup, a very brief markup, to our amendment to address State DCA's concerns where we would provide language in our amendment to be explicitly consistent with their recommendations in the ORC Report, and to do so like in a very few days. With that, we would end our presentation and just ask to be able to rebut at the very end, if there are questions or other information. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Comments from the Planning Commission? Mr. Murray, then Mr. Midney. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Sir, while showing us those various papers, you indicated quite often you were speaking in the future tense, we will, we're going to, et cetera. And I would like to understand whether or not of all of the items that you put on the visualizer, are they to be included in the several days from now submission, every one of the items that you referenced there? MR. ASHER: Every one of the items was already sent to David's staff, comprehensive management staff-- COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. MR. ASHER: -- in our response. And what we would propose is that based on where in that response we indicated that the applicant would further amend the application to be consistent with the requests in DCA objections, that is what we would propose. And again, it would be an amendment to this item as it presently stands. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yes, sir. Ijust want to be absolutely clear for my poor brain. You keep on using the future tense and suggesting that we will, we will. I would have understood it that you would have done so. The submission then that you've made, I would hope then that staff concludes, that is in fact your submission, rather than what we will do in several days. Or am I correct in hearing you that you are now saying you are going to provide what we should have today in several days? MR. ASHER: I think that the -- what goes to your board and may in fact have been an oversight in ours, is ultimately that your action needs to be less on our response and more on the fInal markup. But I'll defer to David to more specially answer that question. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Well, it may be formulated that way, but I think it's critical that it's based on your response to the ORC Report. MR. ASHER: I understand. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: David, as the LP A for Collier County, the exhibits and items that we should have received shouldn't be things that were planned to be submitted to the BCC, they should have I believe come through us in order to be recommended to the BCC in one way or another; is that fair? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah. MR. WEEKS: Yes. I mean, your standard protocol -- and Kevin and I were speaking during the break about this, the agent -- the standard protocol as of course you know is that any proposed text changes are provided to you in advance. And of course I as a staff member is well aware that you don't like last minute changes. And your protocol is usually to have that in strike-through, underlined format so you're able to see in your packet here's what was approved for transmittal by the board and then now here's the changes that are being proposed, whether it be by the applicant or staff or some combination. And through, I don't know, perhaps a misunderstanding, I don't know, but I would respectfully ask that you keep in mind that Kevin's from Miami-Dade County, they have a different process there. And he's not a local agent that deals with you regularly, or us, the county collectively regularly, and I think maybe was unaware that that was the protocol. He has, in his response, as he's made reference to many times, in their response to the ORC Report objections, they have noted, I'll say in general terms, how an objection can be addressed but not specifIcally in that 26 16 1185 , strike-through underlined format for you to be able to directly respond to. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Midney? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, I have a series of questions that basically refers to your statement that you won't be negatively impacting the wetlands. And you said that you are willing to abide by I think it's 1.D which is that there won't be negative impacts to wetlands and the wetland plants and so forth. I guess my first question is you say that you'll only be using 140 acres of heavily impacted areas. How do you calculate the acreage of a trail? How much buffer around the trail do you count as being impacted? MR. ASHER: I'm not certain I have an exact answer. I mean, certainly in the application we proposed that trails would not exceed 10 feet, as in 10 feet wide, where there was motorized, and fIve to six where it's pedestrian. Having said that, let's say for the sake of discussion that there may be a small buffer area there now as in on either side of a stabilized trail. And you want that -- rather than leave it open to native soils that are prone to erosion and compaction, we would use the practices borne out of Big Cypress to provide a stabilized limerock trail that would not allow -- that would still allow water seepage underneath but that would still balance -- and it would be at grade, but it would still balance the use of -- the use versus the retention. I don't have a specifIc answer for you as in how many feet. And in fact I think that that may be something that is a site design issue. But I think that the intent is to move from what are now very wide swamp buggy trails that proliferate through the property, remove those that are both offensive in terms of poor location or their proximity to sensitive areas, and modify those down as in to reduce the width only to what a smaller OHV would utilize. Now, these are the same -- these are OHV's that are currently not gaining access to Big Cypress. Big Cypress has principally only larger OHV's. Now remember, the site is not dominated by OHV's, but it's one of 10 activities that we would like to provide in a wilderness park. So long story short, there is an intent to remove some of the trails, to restore some of those areas, and to ensure that the trails that are actually constructed for motorized OHV's have limited or eliminate their adverse impacts. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: The reason I asked the question is it's hard for me to visualize that the trails just won't spread. How will you keep the people on 15 miles of trails? MR. ASHER: I think that we would keep them on 15 miles of trails in the same way that our next door neighbors, Big Cypress does. You have an education course that teaches people before they can access the property. They'llleam what are the rules. There is a permit to govern access and use. And anyone who is seen or found not staying on trails is simply evicted. So I think there's a certain amount of education, enforcement and peer pressure. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: You compare this to the Big Cypress repeatedly, but they're very different. Big Cypress has a speed limit of 15 miles an hour and you're talking about 25 and 30. Big Cypress, the motorized vehicle is to gain access for hunting or fIshing or whatever, but for this the trails are actually a use in themselves. So I think that there's a big difference in the use, and I think that it's going to be a much heavier use of the wetland. Will you allow the trails to get muddy? MR. ASHER: I think that we would avoid that. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: By just building them up with limerock? MR. ASHER: Stabilizing the base as much as possible. Remember, I think that one of our intents is to stabilize them up to but not exceeding ground level so that there is traditional or historic flow across the property when it does get wet. But the extent to which they may get muddy from erosion from other areas I think kind of remains to be seen. But it's not our intent. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Will you allow a mud riders course? MR. ASHER: No. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: What are your guidelines for closing the trails when you have wet season? How do you decide when it's too wet to have the motorcycles go on the trails? MR. ASHER: I think that's an important point. Hydroperiod was addressed and described in our application. I'm not going to tell you at the land use level that I know the exact day or the exact inch of water that would predicate closing trails to OHV's or closing the park to visitors. But I think that we would learn from Big Cypress and Everglades and others at what levels it would be deleterious to provide public use and access to areas. 27 I; ..., \ \ ,\ I "..1 j 16fllBil COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: How would you reinforce the trails with limerock without compacting the soil? MR. ASHER: Well, I think in some areas you're going to end up having a compacted limerock layer on top. That has never proven to halt subsurface water flows throughout the rest of the property. In fact, you have an airport immediately north of this with a two and one-half mile runway. The same surface flows in that area go under a two and a half mile -- and you've seen, it's not just two and a half miles long, but it's almost a quarter mile wide. Water fmds its way. And a shallow but stabilized OHV trail I don't think is going to prove to be a serious impediment. And particularly since we've obligated the trails would be aligned with the flow, not in opposition. In other words, the flow is northeast to southwest. We would try to adhere to those flow areas. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: So all the trails are going to orient in that direction? MR. ASHER: We're going to attempt to do that, that is correct, sir. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Will the site be bermed? MR. ASHER: No. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: How will you grade out the potholes and the ruts that form when people are riding these trails all day long? MR. ASHER: I think that we would end up maintaining the limerock base. If it took occasional fIlling with limerock. I mean, on the site there is still literally piles of limerock that was dredged from the original quarries that was never used. I'm not certain, or I don't think that we would hope that the level of ridership on here would so undermined a stabilized road as to create potholes. But if it did, we would maintain them in a manner that would least impact the rest of the property. I'm not certain that OHV use is going to dominate this. It mean, there are other activities in other areas that are -- you know, from bird watching to archery to fIshing, a whole array of other affected interests that have kind of raised their hand in terms of looking for other locations. So OHV is one use, one of lOuses. It may be the most concern for this board, but it's unlikely that number-wise it's going to dominate. We just can't have that many. The site is just too small, and I don't think we would risk the type of destruction that high levels would take on that property. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: So you're going to put limitations on the number ofOHV's that can come in on a daily basis? MR. ASHER: Yes. And that was in the application. Both a capacity in terms of annual and daily. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Because I saw annual of 3,000 users. That would only come up to about eight a day. It seems kind oflow. MR. ASHER: It might be. There's certainly going to be times -- remember, there's no expectation that that OHV use is going to be open all year long. And I think there is an expectation that we will adapt the -- any capacity for numbers over time. I don't think that we can -- that the Miami-Dade County Park and Recreation Department can tell you the numbers of people who would come or the frequency at which they would come. We know that Big Cypress has a threshold for theirs, and they reach it very quickly. And they also don't allow all types. I mean, ours is not designed for swamp buggies and jeeps and airboats and larger ones, it's designed for smaller ones and admittedly family type of use. It's not people going out from our property to hunt or to go to sport camps. It's not designed for people to traverse the property in terms of reaching somewhere else. It's designed for them to come as a family opportunity, a family occasion, and enjoy the property for the intact resources. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: I live on a limerock road. And not even going fast or not even using things that kick up mud or kick up dust, that thing has to be regraded often. And I think that if you're going to be having a use that people are going to be riding as recreation, you're going to have to be regrading it a lot. And I'm wondering how you're going to do that without having to repeatedly bring in fIll. MR. ASHER: I'm not certain. I mean, I would venture to guess that it will have to be regraded, it will have to be stabilized and periodically improved. Nothing that I have heard from you I would disagree with. I think that's an appropriate level of management, to maintain such a surface but to do so in the least possible manner, in the least impact locations. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Those are all my questions. 28 16 11 85 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else have any questions before be go to staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, David? Thank you, sir. MR. ASHER: Thank you. MR. WEEKS: Well, just as at transmittal, Commissioners, staff certainly acknowledges there are a lot of benefIts about this proposed subdistrict. And most of the uses that are being proposed are allowed without the need of a comprehensive plan amendment. However, we would remind you that as the applicant has noted, this property is an outparcel within the Big Cypress National Preserve. It is within the Big Cypress area of critical state concern. 93 percent of the site is classifIed as wetlands. Staff does not believe it will be a functional replacement for the former unauthorized A TV trails in the Picayune Strand. And I believe the applicant has readily acknowledged that. There is a limited capacity of the site, given that there will be approximately 15 miles of trails, and the necessary closing during the wettest and driest parts of the season. Staff believes that there's an inherent compatibility issue between ATV's and off-road motorcycle use and nature viewing by those that are hiking or riding bicycles. And we particular note, as has already been commented on, that the speed in the backup materials suggests up to 30 miles per hour would be allowed. The applicant has referred to changing the site from an airport to a park. But to county staffs -- Collier County staffs knowledge, there is no authorized or permitted airport use on this 1 ,60S-acre portion of their ownership. And of course the park proposed is not just for passive uses. Going back to the transmittal hearings, I'll just remind you, as is noted in your staff report, that the staff recommendation was not to approve the EAC vote of 3-2 to support the petition. This body had a tie vote of 4-4; a motion to approve failed by that 4-4 tie. And then the County Commission approved the transmittal by a vote of 4-0. The staff position remains not to approve this petition. The adoption hearing for EAC, the vote was 3-2 not to adopt the petition. As you've seen in the ORC Report and has been discussed extensively by the applicant, DCA did have major objections for this petition. Unlike the other petitions, in this packet and is typical in amendment cycles, there were no recommendations of remedies for this subdistrict. Of the three objections, two of them, the recommendation by DCA is rather bluntly, do not adopt the amendment. The third is revisit the suitability of other potential sites identifIed in previous feasibility studies. Which in my mind is a softer way of saying do not adopt the amendment. Staff has had one telephone conversation with DCA statT, specifIcally Rebecca Jetton, who is the I believe administrator of the area of critical state concern review staff. And her comment simply is that after reviewing the 51-page ORC Report response document, the same one that's been provided to you, that DCA's position remains unchanged. Finally, I would note that you have received correspondence. It was provided in your packet. It was received rather late to staff. It's correspondence from Clyde Butcher and also from the Friends of the Everglades. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, David, thank you. And do we have any registered public speakers? MR. WEEKS: We have two. First is Nicole Ryan, followed by Albert Bellevue. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And for those of you who may still want to speak, you don't need to be registered, but after the registered speakers speak, I'll be asking for anybody else that may want to. Ms. Ryan? MR. WEEKS: Mr. Chairman, I believe Ms. Ryan was out of the room during the swearing in. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. (Speaker was duly sworn.) MS. RYAN: Good morning. For had record, Nicole Ryan, here on behalf The Conservancy of Southwest Florida. And The Conservancy is asking that you recommend not to adopt this amendment. The project has been thoroughly reviewed by county staff, and they have found it inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, the Land Development Code, state statutes and the Florida Administrative Code. 29 , , "'., : ~ v: 16 I 1 B 5' , In spite of this, Collier County did move forward at transmittal to get feedback from vanous state agencies, and feedback you did get. I've never seen so many state agencies in alignment on anything for a very long time. You had feedback from the Water Management District expressing concern about how this could negatively impact Everglades restoration. You had feedback from the Department of Environmental Protection expressing concern about the inconsistency of the amendment with state statute. You had feedback from the Fish and Wildlife Commission expressing concern. And you had feedback from the Department of Community Affairs, and ultimately they are the agency that has to fmd these amendments in compliance. As David Weeks has pointed out, DCA found lots of concerns with this amendment. Their Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report has too many concerns to list individually, but their bottom line was simple and concise: Look for another site for this use for the OHV park, and do not adopt this amendment. So we believe that that message really has been sent clearly from DCA. Nothing in the transmittal response documents have changed their mind. There are really dozens of topic areas for this amendment's inconsistency, but I wanted to point out a couple of the key issues that I think are very relevant for the Planning Commission's recommendation. And fIrst is this proposal's inconsistency with the conservation land use designation as part of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. The intent of the conservation designation is to conserve and maintain the natural resources of Collier County and their associated environmental and recreational and economic benefIts. OHV use is not going to lead to the further conservation and maintenance of these natural resources. Therefore, it's inconsistent with this portion of the comprehensive plan. Secondly, the conservation designation allows passive recreational uses. And passive use is further defIned in your Land Development Code. And that's defmed as nonmotorized. Therefore, the OHV use is inconsistent. Now, it is acknowledged that swamp buggies and ATV's are allowed as part of the Big Cypress management plan, and these uses are secondary. Therefore, you use your swamp buggy to get to your primary use; your hunting, your fIshing, your out -parcel. Having this ATV use as the primary use is going to really intensify the use. And it's certainly going to be in a much smaller footprint than the entirety of the Big Cypress. And there are impacts to the Big Cypress from the current secondary use of OHV's. In the Big Cypress management plan's OHV's supplemental EIS it states that panthers avoided the system of trails designated for ORV use. ORV use has been shown to alter marsh plant composition and structure. It increases turbidity, which means that you don't have plant regeneration. So there are impacts with these uses as a secondary use. It's only logical that having it as a primary use would intensity those impacts. In looking at the subject area, 93 percent of the site is wetlands and the other seven percent are burrow fIts. Therefore, the impacts from this project will be 100 percent in wetlands. The conservation designation states that wetlands are one of the habitats that deserve particular attention because of their ecological value and their sensitivity to perturbations. Therefore, carving 15 acres worth of OHV trails is inconsistent. And I do have a map that shows just what we're talking about with the wetland issue and the fact that this site is the home habitat for 13 different listed species, including the Florida Panther. As you can see on the map, the red outlines the site proposal. You have some pink lines that are going from the top left to bottom right. Those are considered panther least-cost pathways or those travel corridors that panters use. You have the yellow dots which indicate panther telemetry points, so this site is intensively used by panthers. And you have lots of green, indicating wetlands. You can see the borrow pits in brown up at the top. Everything else is green. This site is wetland. The land in question is also part of the Big Cypress area of critical state concern, and as such there's a heightened level of restriction of activities. The proposed use isn't allowed or consistent with the ACSC designation, which is why they're attempting to create a separate 1 ,60S-acre district within that conservation district. The Conservancy is very concerned that this would set a dangerous precedent of allowing the carving up of the conservation designation into separate and distinct districts in order to attempt uses that are not consistent with the umbrella conservation designation. One blatant example of this is the proposed amendment's language that states all development shall comply with the area of critical state concern overlay standards, except for Section 1, site alteration, standard D, which prohibits destruction or alteration of mangrove trees, marsh grasses and wetlands listed by DEP. You can't have a 30 . . 16 , 18~ subset of your conservation designation that's internally inconsistent with that designation. You don't want that, you can't have that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You've got to slow down a little bit, Nicole, okay? MS. RYAN: The amendment is also inconsistent with the conservation and coastal management element, Objective 7.1, which states: The county shall direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitat. Thirteen listed species use this as their habitat. There's also inconsistencies with Florida Statute, Florida Administrative Code. As I mentioned, DEP brought up some of these inconsistencies with Rule 9J-5 which requires that land uses incompatible with protection and conservation of wetlands and their functions be directed away from those areas. Water Management District is concerned that with the removal of the L28levy, that this site which is wet - a portion of the site is wet for most of the year, and then the remainder of the site is wet for the other portion of the year. So this is a site that at some point is going to be 100 percent wet. And with Everglades restoration, the removal of this levy system, more water is going to inundate this site. So there is concern this will directly conflict with the comprehensive Everglades restoration plan. These are concerns that the agencies, the county, many entities have brought up. And, you know, DCA in their ORC Report -- you've read ORC reports before, usually if there's an objection, DCA will work with the applicant, fmd a way to resolve it so the application can move forward. In this case they've said no, don't move forward. If the county does move forward it's going to end up in court. And The Conservancy doesn't want to see that. So we're recommending that you recommend not to adopt this. And I did want to bring up just one additional thing. Because at the EAC meeting, there was a lot of discussion about the feasibility study that determined this site was the most feasible site and really the only feasible site for this use. And The Conservancy took a look, we reviewed the feasibility study and we found some signifIcant concerns with it. And so as you're deliberating, I want you to have these issues in mind. First of all, the criteria for what sites could be considered have something calmed showstoppers in it. A showstopper is something that removed a site from consideration altogether. And one of the showstoppers is if the land is public land obtained for conservation or mitigation. So it would seem that something within the ACSC, everything around it obtained for conservation could trigger this. Well, in fact it's actually just Miami-Dade County's environmentally endangered lands that are considered public lands for conservation that would automatically be removed from consideration. And I don't want to belabor the ranking system, but I do want to point out a few inconsistencies. First of all, there were a number of categories used to evaluate the various sites. One was environmental consideration. And this was based on the presence of wetlands, listed species. It also took into account contamination, reclamation needs and disturbance. And the matrix gave a scale of one to fIve; one being the least desirable site. If you have a lot of wetlands, a lot oflisted species habitat, if you have contamination. Five are disturbed areas that you would want to focus this use on. The jet port range is a three, meaning that the site was neither contaminated or disturbed. A three for a site that is 100 percent wetlands, habitat for 13 listed species. There's a problem with that score. Another scoring consideration was zoning. And that was based on current Miami-Dade zoning classifIcations of sites, both the site and the surrounding areas. The selection criteria explained that lands preferred for this use would be ago lands within the urban development boundary, industrial lands or undetermined lands. And the jet port ranked as a four, meaning that it was industrial or ago located in the urban development boundary or on zoned land. Well, that doesn't capture this site. This site is conservation, ACSC with an ST overlay. So there's a problem with that scoring criteria. And I also want to point out the remoteness of this location. Accessibility really is a concern, even though accessibility in the scoring matrix dealt with is there a road leading to the site. This is 60 to 75 minutes away from most urbanized areas on both coasts; it's remote; medical access is pretty far away; it's subject to flooding. So all of these considerations were taken. Department of Environmental Protection believed that the feasibility study needs to be revisited. The Conservancy concurs. This is an inappropriate use in this location, we believe other sites should be evaluated, and we ask that you recommend not to adopt this amendment based on 31 1611854 incompatibility with both county code and state law. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. David, the next registered speaker? MR. WEEKS: Albert Belliveau. MR. BELLIVEAU: For the record, my name is Albert Belliveau, and I'm a permanent resident of Collier County. Unfortunately this staff speaker and Nicole has stolen most of my material. But what I -- I was surprised to hear from the gentleman from Miami-Dade indicating the need to change the use of this from airport to recreational and passive motorized. When he used the word passive motorized I says if that's not an oxymoron, I've never seen one. I don't know how many of you are familiar with the history of the Big Cypress, but the reason the Big Cypress is not part of the Everglades National Park is because the campers, the owners, the fIsherman, the hunters wanted access to their camps. And there was a marriage between the environmentalists, the state, the federal government that provided for a lot of the rules that control Big Cypress. Miami wanted to build a big airport, a supersonic airport. As I understand, it's now turning out to be a supersonic car runway. They're not monitoring it. There are trespassers that are using multi uses in this area. And I'm asking, with all their great plans where are they going to get the money, or where are we going to get the money? Because all of this property is here in Collier County. I know there's going to be lawsuits involved and I think the DCA will be one of the primary plaintiffs. And I look and see that in spite of staffs recommendation not to accept this recommendation that you have the DCA, the Florida Wildlife Commission, the Water District, the DEP, The Conservancy of Southwest Florida, and I'm sure there are numerous other organizations that fInd this to be an inappropriate use. And I'm asking myself, well, what is Collier County getting out of this other than increased traffic, increased emissions? He talks about a trail not being -- interfering with the water. That's what they said about Route 41. That was a dam right across the whole damn state that stopped the water from going into the Everglades. I look at the water that's coming out of Lake Okeechobee that's being used by Miami and Ft. Lauderdale. Those same two cities who have a 6-1 ratio of off-highway vehicles to ours. And yet when the lake is to be emptied because there's too much water, where does it go? It comes over here. Weare now being attacked, or at least the possibility of attack of a huge oil spill coming in from the west. Do we need another attack coming in from the east? Why can't the politicians in Miami-Dade fInd property there? There's property there for this kind of use. And I would ask you not to approve this plan. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. Does anybody else wish to speak on this item? Yes, ma'am, come on up and please state your name for the record. MS. CALKINS: Good morning. I'm Susan Calkins. THE COURT REPORTER: Were you sworn in? MS. CALKINS: No, I was not. (Speaker was duly sworn.) THE COURT REPORTER: Could you spell your last name? MS. CALKINS: C-A-L-K-I-N-S. Well, it was a week ago today I was driving across with my husband the Tamiami Trail and we stopped at Big Cypress. And I've been there before of course, but we stopped just to see what was going on, looked, noticed a little sign, you know, register your ATV if you're coming in here. And as I was listening to all the family-oriented activities that were going to be taking place in this proposed facility, you know, I kept thinking but all of this is in the park. And per the previous speaker's comment, it seems to me that, you know, what -- ifthere's a need for this family-oriented activity where we have more hiking and biking and bird watching and off-road vehicles, if there's a need for that, then maybe the issue is expanding a little bit on our park rather than creating a park beside the park. I really have a hard time listening to all of this this morning, recognizing why Collier County would agree to 32 16 , 185 I .;~ .:~~;.. . put a Miiuni-Dade Parks aii'd Rec facility in the middle of Big Cypress in what we know is an environmentally sensitive area. And for all the things we've talked about, it seems to be absurd. I know that we're looking in Collier County for a place for our A TV riders. This isn't it. You know, I think as Miami-Dade, as Collier, we can fmd other places. So it may be difficult, but this is not the place. So I would certainly urge the Planning Commission not to support this proposal. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Okay, I believe that's everybody. Sir, you asked for a rebuttal. I ask that you keep it short and to the point. MR. ASHER: I'll surrender my time. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. With that, we'll entertain any questions from the Planning Commission. Ms. Ahem? COMMISSIONER AHERN: David, you stated that the EAC vote 3-2 to not approve. And I was looking in our packet it said 3-2 to approve. MR. WEEKS: The 3-2 vote in support was at the transmittal hearing. At the adoption hearing held earlier this month, their vote was flip-flopped 3-2 not to support. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else have any questions before we seek a motion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, with that, is there a motion? Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yes, I'll make a motion that we do not recommend approval of --I'll get the number here. CP -- I've lost the number. CP-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: 2009-1. COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, 9-1. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Second. COMMISSIONER CARON: I think it's -- thank you, Mr. Murray. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray's made a second. Ms. Caron's still making her motion. It's still there, though. COMMISSIONER CARON: Ijust -- I want to say that as I think most of us stated last time around, it's not consistent with conservation or our own Growth Management Plan. We have issues of93 percent wetlands. It's in the ASCS -- ACSC, excuse me. It's in outstanding Florida waters. There are multiple listed species issues. It has the potential to interfere with Everglades restoration. I still believe that there are safety issues with this location and the fact that cell phone usage is not great. And beyond that, safety issues for both police and fIre and EMS. Add to that the cost for Collier County. I'm seeing huge costs for Collier County and not great benefIts. That's my motion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Second still holds? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Oh, my second is going to hold, and I'd like to make a comment, if! may. The last time this came before us, I voted for it. And in this case I've very strongly changed my mind. 140 miles of trails would not satisfy the A TV needs that we have. And with the things that have been said here by Conservancy and restated by Commissioner Caron are certainly valid. If that was what we were attempting to do to satisfy some of the needs of the A TV riders, it doesn't do the job. And on top of it, it destroys property that really needs to stay pristine. So I'm happy to change my mind. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other comments? Mr. Midney? COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Yeah, I think that we really do need an ATV facility in the county, because there are just a lot of -- I'm thinking of a lot of teenage boys and a lot of young people who for them it's something very positive to do, it's a good family activity for a lot of people. But our job as a planning board is to site development in the appropriate places, and this unfortunately is not the appropriate places. And this unfortunately is not the appropriate place. After questioning the applicant about how they would try to mitigate the impacts to the wetlands, I'm not convinced that this would not have a big impact on the wetlands and on the endangered species, so I'll be supporting 33 "- , I \ " ....#~ ,-.../ .. the motion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Yeah. I mean, I prior voted in favor of this. I think the land has kind of been messed up by the prior activities. But the problem I have is with some of the comments, especially the comment not to resubmit or not to retransmit. I can't overcome that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay, anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm going to be supporting the motion. First of all, there's no excuse why the applicant couldn't have provided the information that they have eluded to as being willing to do or will provide in the future. This board is the LP A of Collier County. I don't care what the processes are in Miami-Dade. If you come here, you need to know our rules, and you should have been providing that information that was sought to fInalize those issues that were outstanding. I see no practical benefIt of this to Collier County. In fact, I see detrimental impacts to both our emergency services and the emergency service response times. I fmd it to be inconsistent with various elements of9J-5, our Growth Management Plan, the standards of the ACSC and the Big Cypress Preserve, and I believe it's incompatibility with the surrounding area as well as the conservation designation that overlays this property. So with all those reasons in mind, I will be supporting those motion. Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor of the motion to recommend denial, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 8-0. *** And that takes us to the very end of our agenda today. I wish to thank staff for all the help they've done in participation, and of course Cherie' and Kady in the records departments. I would like to make a note to the Planning Commission that on Thursday afternoon after we finish our regular hearing -- I keep saying afternoon, only because I think it will take that long. But whenever we fmish our regular hearing on Thursday we will fmish a discussion on Item 5-C, CP-2008-4. And we'll take a vote at that time. So with that in mind, is there a motion to adjourn? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So moved. COMMISSIONER VIGLIOTTI: Motion. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So moved. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray, seconded by Mr. Vigliotti. All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. Anybody opposed? (No response.) 16 ~:1i15 34 16 , 1 0 j CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We are out of here. Thank you all. **************** There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 11:18 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION liJd.f~ These minutes approved by the board on q - z.,. (t> as presented V;;;as corrected_. Transcript prepared on behalf of Gregory Reporting Service, Inc., by Cherie' R. Nottingham. 35 F~r. ~~./ R[c::v~D16 I tr J/ ...:.:- ,_ 7K:iv 1 iOlO SEP 1 0 2010 0 e / Board ofC.2WltY..~ Coletta c/ TRANSCRIPT OF THb MccTlNtiOF THE " r1f/1 " COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ \).."w AiJ J Naples, Florida ()~ V:~;.sJ {r ~ July 1,2010 d u.,,-.. "r-,r-~~ l:~ ~ LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of ~- v 'i! Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of 11 the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Mark P. Strain Melissa Ahem Brad Schiffer Donna Reed Caron Bob Murray Karen Homiak Paul Midney (Absent) Robert Vigliotti (Absent) ALSO PRESENT: Nick Casalanguida, Growth Management Division Ray Bellows, Zoning Director Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Assistant County Attorney MIsc. Corres Date: Page 1 Item '"__ " . ..,:-::; to \ 0 .1. 16 liB S I July 1,2010 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to the July 1st meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. If you'll all please rise for Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Item #2 ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron, would you mind doing the roll call. COMMISSIONER CARON: Yes. Ms. Ahem? COMMISSIONER AHERN: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I am here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Midney is absent. Ms. Caron is here. Mr. Strain? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here. COMMISSIONER CARON: Mr. Vigliotti is absent. Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I'm here. COMMISSIONER CARON: And Ms. Homiak. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Item #3 ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Addenda to the agenda. Any changes needed by anybody? (No response.) Item #4 PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Planning Commission absences. Next meeting is 7/15/10. Anybody know if they're not going to be here for that meeting? COMMISSIONER CARON: I thought that meeting got canceled at our last meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, that's right. It might be. Ray was -- good point. MR. BELLOWS: Yes. That meeting has been canceled. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. But how many would like to come anyway? No, nobody? Oh, dam, okay. Thank you, Ray. We had, in my -- at some point we had scheduled a meeting for the GMP on 7/19 and 7/20. I don't fInd them still on the book. I did fmd them on my Rolodex. It looks like they've been canceled, too. Okay. Wow, that wipes out the month. We won't be back here until August. And I don't even know -- what's the fIrst one in August; does anybody -- MR. BELLOWS: That would be -- COMMISSIONER CARON: The 5th. MR. BELLOWS: -- August 5th, and we do have items on that agenda. Page 2 J.. ~;o 16 J 1 8 5 -.4 July 1, 2010 . . " \ . CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We do have? MR. BELLOWS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does anybody know if they're not going to be here on the 5th this far in advance? (No response.) Item #5 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 20. 2010 AND JUNE 3. 2010 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. With that, we have two sets of minutes for approval. We'll need a motion, assuming everything's okay, for the May 20, 20 I 0, minutes. COMMISSIONER CARON: Motion to approve. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Ms. Caron, seconded by Melissa Ahem. I'll get your last name right here, Melissa. Sorry. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries, 6-0. How about the June 3, 2010, minutes? COMMISSIONER CARON: Motion to approve. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Same, by Ms. Caron, by Ms. Ahem. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries, 6-0. Item #6 BCC REPORT - RECAPS - JUNE 22. 2010 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ray, we have BCC report and recaps. MR. BELLOWS: Yes. On June 22nd the Board of County Commissioners heard the Heritage Bay PUD amendment and the signed variance for American Momentum Center. Those two items were approved on the summary agenda. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Great, thank you. Item #7 Page 3 16 11 B p I July 1,2010 CHAIRMAN'S REPORT CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Chairman's report. A couple of things. The last meeting we had, or two meetings ago, we had a dock extension for Rotkvich, and I guess it's coming back today. There was a memo sent out, Nick, by your office to the Board of County Commissioners concerning that petition, and the petition said the following: The boat dock petition was continued to July 1 st CCPC meeting because the applicant has provided a plan that is slightly different from the DEP plan. First of all, I'm not sure what the signifIcance of the word slightly was, because the plan had two things missing on it that we ask of every other applicant, an accurate depth readings and a mangrove line. Both of those are criteria involving primary and secondary considerations. So I don't think it was a slightly different issue. It was a serious issue because we had a series of primary and secondary conditions that were dependent upon it. And I don't want -- I really don't think it's good to trivialize our position to the board as an independent memo, or even any memo for that matter. MR. CASALANGUIDA: Yeah. It wasn't intended to trivialize your position, Commissioner. So we'll make a note of that and make a correction for the future. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Great, thank you. And then the other thing is, admin. report or I mean admin. code. I watched your -- Susan's presentation, then yours. Susan's basically was that we recommended approval and you -- and I've got to give you credit for standing up for the Planning Commission. You got up and elaborated a little bit on our position, although at the time you did I didn't know that the Board of County Commissioners had any knowledge of the fIscal impact, but you did express a concern about that. When I talked with you, I found out it was on the overhead. I just hadn't seen it either -- I didn't check it on the packet or didn't see it on the television. The only thing I wanted to add to that is, they approved the admin. code at a time when this county has signifIcantly less dollars to spend on many things that are very important. The admin. code isn't a necessity. We're doing fme with the LDC. We've been doing it that way since time began. I thought the intent of this board was to say, yes, it's a better concept, but with the budget issues you have, it may not be the necessity you need to react to at this time. I'm just kind of making that note for the record, because at least that was my intent when I was speaking on the admin. code. I certainly can't speak for the rest of the panel here. I still don't see the necessity, and I think your numbers -- I think you told me 160 on the phone, and it might have been around that number. I think that's woefully shy of the money it's going to cost when all the factors are weighed in. But so be it. I wanted to clear that piece up. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Just a question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: No, Nick, when you gave your presentation, there was a slide that -- okay. That makes sense. MR. CASALANGUIDA: Yep. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. With that, we'll move on to the consent agenda items, and we've got a slough of them, and we'll have to take them individually. David, I guess you want to -- why don't you come up and just walk us through each one. And after you call them out, we'll ask for a vote. Item #8A PETITION: CP-2007-3, AMENDING THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN TO CREATE THE MISSION SUBDISTRICT MR. WEEKS: For the record, David Weeks of the Comprehensive Planning Section. Commissioners, fIrst up is petition -- petition CP-2007-3. And the -- in your packet you received from Page 4 -.) ;. . .i ~ ," ~ , . 16 II BD July 1, 2010 Comprehensive Planning staff, a four-page document identifying the consent agenda changes for your review today. The text that has been added or deleted is in double underline, double strikethrough, bold, and highlight to make it stand out. For the petition, CP-07-3, one phrase was added regarding height. And the only change from the text you see here versus the text that was in your packet from the applicant is the word except. In the applicant's language it said however; I changed that to except. I think it reads better. It certainly has no substance of impact. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Is there a motion or questions? Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I will move that we forward with a recommendation of approval. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made and seconded, by Mr. Schiffer, seconded by Mr. Murray. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries, 6-0. Item #SB PETITION: CP-200S-2, AMENDING THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FOR THE EXPANSION OF RANDALL BL YD. COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Next one is CP-200S-2. MR. WEEKS: Looking at the handout from staff, the bottom of Page 1, there's a sentence that has been struck through. And turn over to Page 2 in the middle. What used to be letter E 1 has been struck through. Both of those were presented at the -- at your hearing on this matter, and those were changes made by the County Attorney's Office to correlate with other changes that have been presented to you, and that pertains to the fact that tract 71 is no longer a part of this amendment. Then turning over to Page 3, at the very bottom, the placeholder text regarding transportation mitigation has been struck - stricken through, and then the actual text has been inserted, and that reflects what was discussed at your hearing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And you've got the addition on Page 4 on the bottom. MR. WEEKS: That's for the next petition. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, I'm sorry. You're right. Okay. Are there any -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Move to approve. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Made by Mr. Schiffer, seconded by Mr. Murray. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. Page 5 16 11 B.( July 1,2010 COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. Item #SC PETITION: CP-200S-4, AMENDING THE FlITURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FlITURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES MR. WEEKS: And fmally, Mr. Chairman, petition CP-200S-4 on the bottom of Page 4, and that simply reflects what was discussed at your hearing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Brad? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I move with a recommendation of approval. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Bob? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Motion made and seconded by the same parties. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries, 6-0. MR. WEEKS: Thank you. Item #SD and #SE PETITIONS: CPSP-200S-7 AND CP-2009-l CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And David, for the record, the CPSP-200S-7 and CP-2009-l, because there were no changes in those, those don't need to be reviewed on consent, and they're going forward like we approved them at the last meeting. MR. WEEKS: That is correct, and actually CP-09-l, you recommended denial. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. MR. WEEKS: You're correct. Thank you, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. Item #SF PETITION: PUDZ-200S-AR-13375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH. INe. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The next two items on consent are PUDZ-200S-AR-13375, the North Naples United Methodist Church, Inc., on Goodlette-Frank Road. Anybody have any questions or concerns about the agenda item? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I mean, it has nothing to do with the consent part of it, but I wish we would Page 6 ,...' , ,. A '-' t 16 I 1'~;" B 5 July 1, 2010 get the road right-of-ways dedicated on these kind of sites that go to the center line of the right- -- what would be the right-of-way. Just a comment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It would make it simple, huh? Is that a motion to approve then? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I will make a motion to approve. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I will second it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ah. Mr. Schiffer and Mr. Murray, fIrst and second. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor of the motion, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries, 6-0. Item #8G (Discussed and continued to later in the meeting) PETmON: PUDZ-A-PL2009-2031. ROCK CREEK HOLDINGS: MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Next one up is PUDZ-A-PL2009-203l, Rock Creek Holdings, LLC, the Meridian Village MPUD. And I had a discussion with Mr. Hancock on this, and it looks like there's a, maybe, possible discrepancy between what the applicant had agreed to and what staff had interpreted. So, Bruce, you want to tell us what's going on? MR. ANDERSON: Yes, sir. This is on Page 14 of the PUD document. My name's Bruce Anderson, for the record. And it's paragraph eight. And fIrst let me say that the discrepancy is the applicant's fault, or the applicant's agent's fault. There was a change that was supposed to be made when it was resubmitted to the county. That change was not made. I've set out there the paragraph in question, and it has been struck through and underlined from what you had before you when this was heard two weeks ago, and those are the changes that we interpreted what you meant to do. What you have in the agenda packet gives Collier County an additional 45 days after the six months that was approved at the Planning Commission meeting. And our understanding was, six months was six months was six months, and the county had six months to act and make an offer and buy the units, just as a qualifIed buyer would have, because we specifIcally discussed seven months or more, and the compromise was made that it would be six months instead of seven. If you tack that 45 days on, you wind up at seven-and-a-half months total. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So what you're suggesting is that within that six-month period, it's open for everybody within the same time frame, and there is no add on of 45 days after that. Say you couldn't get the public interested; then the county could have 45 days to react to that? MR. ANDERSON: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Instead, their 45 days, or whatever time frame they want to allot for themselves, is captured within the initial six months. So if it takes 45 days for the county to react, they have to do so four-and-a-half months after the game starts? MR. ANDERSON: Yes, correct. The 45 days, when it was put in there originally -- and I took this from the Heritage Bay language almost verbatim. The 45 days was put in there because the acquisition period was tied to the building permit, and there wasn't any extra time period after the CO was issued. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody? Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I mean, I think the only problem with that is that puts the county and the Page 7 16 j 1 B 5~ lJuly 1,2010 public side by side, and then the county, what, stands in the wings? And I'm not even sure how they would even know whether the public's interested or not. So fIrst of all, if we're going to go with just the six months, the county should be notifIed, and if you want four-and-a-half months in, that a sale is not -- it appears a public sale isn't going to happen -- because otherwise, how would the -- I mean, what is the county going to do, just try to buy it and then just wait and see? So I mean, the other system that they don't want actually works because that - they give them six months to sell to the public, if that doesn't work, the county has a 45-day period to buy it themselves, and then it hits the free market. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: That's not my recollection. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah. That's not my recollection. I was the one that put up -- internally put up a very long period, two years initially, just to start a conversation. And if I'm not mistaken, Commissioner Schiffer had suggested in a motion that it be six months, and I said, fme, I can live with that. And that was my understanding, straight six months. And I recall the chairman making a comment, something to the effect, that we have some pretty good people in the county who I'm sure will be watching out for it. So that was my recollection. I didn't see any need to put additional time on it at this point. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Brad's -- I don't think Brad's looking for additional time. He's looking for additional notifIcation. Bruce, as a way to get there, why couldn't there be a stipulation added into here that -- and four-and-a-half months is an awkward period of time. Why don't we just say, four months after CO the applicant will notify the appropriate county staff that there is no buyer pending for a particular unit and that we have 60 -- 30 -- yeah, 60 days from that point in order to fmish the transaction, something to that effect? Is that -- MR. ANDERSON: That's fme. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I like that. MR. ANDERSON: That's reasonable. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah, that's fme. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Now, Heidi, this is consent, so how do we get that kind oflanguage done and in the right format for us to review it, or is it something that can be done by email and then have any input prior to going to the board? Or how do you see the cleanup of this paragraph? MS. ASHTON: I'd suggest that Bruce and I meet on the break, and we'll fmalize the language and have you approve it at the end of the agenda, if that's acceptable. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does that work for you, Bruce? MR. ANDERSON: Yes, that'd be fme. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then we'll defer-- MS. ASHTON: And there is one typo on what he has on the overhead, which is the sixth word in. It would be offered for sale instead of referred for sale. CHAIRMAN STRAIN : Yeah. Actually our documents have offered that -- MS. ASHTON: Yeah. It's just a typo on what he has on the overhead. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then what we'll do is continue PUD-200S-AR-1335 -- -3375 on consent 'til later in the day, sometime after the break. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Mark-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: -- one more comment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Go ahead? You know, this is the fIrst time we see actually a turnaround being drawn in the right-of-way, and the concern I have is -- and I guess, Heidi, something -- you might have to research this, but back when they consolidated this piece of land by vacating the public roads, I'm sure there was a requirement that a turnaround be put in. I just wonder if the intent back then was to put the turnaround on the property, because this turnaround is much smaller than essentially what the fIre department would require. MR. HANCOCK: For the record, Tim Hancock with Davidson Engineering. Page 8 .' , - h ~,-, *' 1 6 I 1 B 5 July 1, 2010 Commissioner Schiffer, no, sir. The intent was never to place it on the subject property. As you know, currently there is no turnaround. It's just a dead-end. This was viewed as clearly an improvement to the existing conditions and to be done at the developer's expense. But no, sir, it was never intended to be on the subject property. It was always intended to be within the existing remaining right-of-way subsequent to the vacation. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. Even back when they vacated the roads to create this property -- because back prior to that, that Stevies Avenue did have the ability to pull through. So back when they consolidated this land and they said that they would put a turnaround there, they never meant that the turnaround would be a legitimate turnaround on the property itself? MR. HANCOCK: My recollection of the vacation record, as I reviewed it, was that the turnaround was not addressed at the time of vacation. It was actually addressed at the time rezone when this project came in in 1996. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Then I'm done. Thank you. MR. HANCOCK: 2006. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Actually, if I recall, the document signed by the commission at the time stipulated it shall be between lot 6 and 26. It actually labeled the lots and where that turnaround should occur. And I'm assuming you matched that up to what's on this document; is that -- MR. HANCOCK: That sounds correct, yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then we'll just come back after break and try to finish this up. MR. ANDERSON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Next item on consent is PUDZ-A-PL2009, 2031 Rock Creek Holdings, LLC, Meridian Village, M- -- well, wait a minute. That's the one we just got done with. Sorry. That's the one that's continued 'til after break. Okay. We'll move into the regular hearing. Item #9A PETITION: BD-PL2009-ll57. ROTKVICH BOAT DOCK CHAIRMAN STRAIN: First advertised public hearing is a continued item from a prior meeting. It's boat dock PL2009-l 157, Michael and Debra Rotkvich, and it's Lot 43 on South Port on the Bay, Unit 2. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And disclosures on the part of the Planning Commission? Anybody? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: None. Okay. Sir, it's all yours. MR. KELLY: My name is Mike Kelly, again. I'm with Paradise Docks. I will be the builder for Mike and Debbie Rotkvich for their dock. The fIrst slide that I have up here is the Old Hickory Bay area, and all this slide shows is the location of the selected property where the dock's going to go with a dock drawn on this overhead. It also shows the numbers that you see going around on the street or the distances of protrusion for each of the docks around the area. And the reason I wanted to show you this particular slide here is because it is rather shallow in that area, and there is a lot of other docks that have to go out far enough to get a particular boat on there, on their slip. They have to go out at least that far. The other issue that we had that was of interest to you last time is there was no drip line on the survey. The particular surveyor, when I questioned him concerning the old survey, he just drew something on there indicating that there was mangroves. He didn't realize that I needed a drip line. So he went back, and this is a revision to that survey, and it shows a drip line. The distance out from the mean high tide to where the bow of the boat will be is approximately -- well, it is 15 foot to his -- to the drip line that he has drawn on his survey. And I'll show you how that would show on the actual overlay here. As you can see, the 15 foot is to the bow -- or towards the bow of the boat from the mean high water, and that's where his drip line was indicated on his survey. Page 9 , c~ 16 j 1B 1 July 1,2010 From the boat that I have drawn on here, that would give us about three-and-a-half feet to the actual canopy or drip line of the mangroves. The other issue that we had run into, that there was a little bit of a disparity with the depths going out, and so all the depths were coordinated with the depth chart that the surveyor provided, which I had on the previous slide. And as you can see, the smaller lift, the three foot required for our lift, is actually in the middle of the lift. DEP questioned me on that initially, and I said, well, I'm going to have to go before Planning Commission, and we don't -- we don't want to go out any further than we have to, but they would like for the entire lift to be within that three foot, but they went ahead and waived that. And they said, well, if they've got enough depth to run that lift up and down -- and I assured them they did, because this is a smaller lift for the flats boat or the jet ski, whichever Mr. Rotkvich decides to purchase. The other boat is fIne. The depths are fme on that. The bow. Like I said, to move this in any further would mean that the bow of that boat would be dangerously close to hitting the mangroves and could either damage the boat or damage the mangroves, and we didn't want either one of those situations. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Any questions? Melissa? COMMISSIONER AHERN: On the -- on the chart where you show the measurements in relation to the depth, it looks like you have 35 feet on there twice? MR. KELLY: On the survey, ma'am, or which-- COMMISSIONER AHERN: The cross-section. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Attachment B. MR. KELLY: Oh. COMMISSIONER AHERN: It appears to be in 5-foot increments, so it probably just needs to be clarifIed to 30. MR. KELLY: That was -- yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You've got to use the microphone, sir, when you speak, so-- MR. KELLY: Excuse me. That's correct. That fIrst 35 should be 30. That is -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Brad? MR. KELLY: -- because it is in 5-foot increments. Thank you. That's something I missed. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Ray, can you go back to the plan, the prior -- MR. BELLOWS: Do you have the prior? MR. KELLY: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: One of the things we try to do is avoid excessive docks. On the smaller lift, why didn't you pull it out? Last time I asked you why you didn't pull the top in. But this time, why didn't you move that smaller lift further out and, thus, not create such a large dock area? MR. KELLY: Well, the smaller lift does not require much depth to float either a flats boat or ajet ski. And a lift of that size has real small cradles and bunks. So you don't need as much depth as you would with a larger lift, such as the one on the right. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. MR. KELL Y: You just don't need that kind of depth to float a jet ski or a flats boat. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, my concern is, you don't really need that large dock area just to access a boat. I mean, these -- what we're supposed to do is allow you to do that, but you're not -- we're not supposed to allow you to put areas where you could have chairs and tables and make it a retreat, so -- MR. KELLY: Yes, sir, and I understand that concern. And they don't have any intentions of putting chairs, tables, benches, or anything like that. They do have family that comes down and visits them, and they would like to fIsh off of that area if, you know -- but they don't have any intentions to store anything in that area. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay, thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else have any questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sir, the boat that you have, the big boat, it shows it's 28 feet; is that correct? MR. KELLY: That is correct yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The little boat is how long? I think -- because it goes almost -- it goes longer than the 12 foot, two inches called out on this plan, because the bow goes all the way over to the walkway. So what is that, Page 10 16 11Ip.., BSty 1,2010 around 15 feet? MR. KELLY: No -- well, yes, sir. You could put up to a 12- to IS-foot vessel on that lift, yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And the lift, by the diagram you show here, is made for two. So that's, let's say, 30 feet on top of the 28; you're at 58 feet, and you're only allowed to have up to 45. Now, I know you're going to say, but that other slip can be used for a skiffs boat or some light backwater boat, but you'd have to have a square boat to fIt into an ll-by-12 foot square area, and I don't think there's many square boats like that. MR. KELLY: Well, most of the -- most of the flats boats-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Vb-huh. MR. KELLY: -- that would -- that's the purpose of this lift is to restrict the size of the vessel. He doesn't want anything but maybe a jet ski or a flats boat. He hasn't decided. He doesn't even own a particular boat at this point in time. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But the way this is shown, he, in essence, is going to have -- could have two jet skis there, which would exceed the amount of boat length used -- allowed on that particular lot. MR. KELLY: It would, and it would also exceed the requirements by DEP and Army Corps, which allows us to have two vessels. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, why don't you run this other boat and this other slip on the opposite side of the 28-foot boat in the same direction? If it's shorter, which you've -- which it has to be in order to fIt on the property, you wouldn't need to come in from the side, you could come straight in, and you wouldn't need that big deck that Brad's concerned about. The reason I'm saying that is because it looks like a setup. It looks like you're going to have two jet skis there. And you know how -- it's real difficult to monitor that stuff out there in the middle of nowhere. And I'm just wondering why you just don't make it simpler; have two along side. You don't even need that giant 8-by-12-foot deck. It just disappears, and you've got two side-by-side slips; one for each boat. And it's wider; be easier for you to get in and out of. MR. KELLY: The purpose of -- the reason it's set up like that and the reason it's -- it is a double -- or it is not a double slip. It is a slip that's wide enough for two boats; however -- if you were going to put two jet skis. The reason we didn't go with a single davit style of jet ski, because they're very difficult to operate and they deteriorate because they're in -- either in the water or they put undue stress on the pilings. This is a setup that we have set up, and we have put dual jet skis on a particular lift just like this. It's the easiest way for a person to get on. But I have informed Mr. Rotkvich that he's only allowed to have two vessels out there. That's what DEP and Army Corps and the county government, both in Lee and Collier; allow only two vessels. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I -- and I understand they do, but unfortunately when rules -- when it's set up so that rules could be easily broken, sometimes they are broken. MR. KELLY: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And, you know, whether your applicant may be -- have no intention of doing that, say he sells the house. Realtor's going to say, look at that, you can hold two -- put two jet skis here, plus a main boat, and all of a sudden it becomes a common acceptance style instead of one that is restricted by the way it's designed, and I think we're safer by restricting it by design. Well, anyway, that's my thoughts on it, and I understand your position. So-- MR. KELLY: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- we'll have to go from there. Before we hear from the staff, is there any other questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you, sir. Staff report. MS. GUNDLACH: Good morning, Commissioners. I'm Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner with the Department of Land Development Services. And staff is recommending approval of the Rotkvich boat dock this morning, and it would be my pleasure to answer any questions you might have. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody have any questions of staff? Page 11 16l~f B.5 July 1,2010 Okay. Brad, Ms. Caron. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll ask one. And, Nancy, are you okay with the dock? I mean, we really don't want to have dock area that's not necessary for accessing the boat. We've been through this before in some other applications. Do you think this dock area is larger than it need be? MS. GUNDLACH: Well, this is my fIrst dock application. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. MS. GUNDLACH: So it looks fme to me. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: You can ask Ray. MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows. I worked on this project with AsWey Caserta, who was our most experienced boat dock extension planner. It technically meets the code requirements, but I agree with you, the concerns are there about how the design is, and especially in lieu of the two-boat minimum and space for three. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else? Ms. Caron, did you have some follow-up? COMMISSIONER CARON: Well, I was just going to follow up on that issue. I don't know why we would be approving a boat dock extension that clearly shows that three boats of some size can be on the plan and just take on good faith that somebody's not going to utilize what they're allowed to build. I'm not sure that that's a really good policy on the part of the county. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would have no problem if the applicant wanted to come in with two docks straight in side by side and so it clearly shows you're only building something that could hold two boats. But when you show that something could be for three boats and, in fact, you go out of your way as far as access goes to even make it more difficult for the other two, it just doesn't make sense. But -- I mean, I'm not very comfortable with that. Nick, you had something you wanted to add? MR. CASALANGUIDA: Being creative, if he put the boat dock, as Commissioner Schiffer had noted, still nothing's stopping him from buying two jet skies and putting it on a boat ramp that would hold two jet skis. I mean, if I'm an owner, if you turn that 90 degrees, just the design alone wouldn't restrict that, is my point. Ifhe turned that 90 degrees and faced it the same way the other boat was, he could buy a lift that could accommodate two jet skis as well. I mean, so -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Two things. Number one, you would turn it in the opposite direction, which means you'd eliminate the excessive deck because you wouldn't have to -- you'd only put one deck there. So if they wanted to get to that outside jet ski, they'd have to jump over the other one. So it's more impractical for them than to have the outside jet ski. With this design, they've got docks around both jet ski accesses, which could be the intention. Plus, if you didn't have the jet skis going in that direction, but from the other front, this whole facility could be moved back several feet closer to the mangroves. You wouldn't need the extension of the dock that's being asked for here today, which is in violation of another primary and secondary criteria. So anyway, that counters your argument as far as -- MR. CASALANGUIDA: It's not argument. It's just a statement. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I didn't mean it as argumentative. I just meant that's your position. Yes, sir? MR. KELLY: Now, one thing I just wanted to point out, the cradle on that particular lift is II-foot. That's the smallest cradle system I could get. Generally speaking, when we set it up for a double jet ski for a customer that wants that, we will get the 12- to l2-and-a-halffoot cradle, because that just doesn't give you enough room. If you put two jet skis, the current jet skis that are made today, you're talking about four-and-a-half, fIve foot wide. If you lose a foot of that cradle because it rides up and down the middle of each of the outside pilings -- so you subtract a foot, that's 10 foot. You get two four-and-a-half-foot to fIve-foot jet skis; they won't fIt on this lift very well. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sir-- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- the depth of the lift that you're talking about is no greater than 15 feet. You don't have the dimension on here. The depth of that long side slip, if you were to turn this whole thing 90 degrees, come in straight off the bay, you'd have -- according to this chart, you'd have 20 foot of depth, which is more than you need. Page 12 '-, 16 ."B 5 July 1, 20 I 0 .. " \ So there's no reason you couldn't turn this in the other direction and avoid that excessive deck that Brad keeps mentioning and not provide that access way to a slip that you potentially are claiming you'll never use. So what's wrong with coming in straight in? Much easier off the bay and not having to go through the effort you've got here? And then we avoid that unnecessary deck. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: While he's thinking, Mark, I mean, a comment is, we really do have to design these so that the next person is the one. I mean, for example, there was a sign that said I had to drive 45 miles an hour down Goodlette today, and I'm not so sure I was as good about that as they intended. So the next people that buy it, they could have picnic tables down on the dock, two jet skis, and a nice big boat sitting there. MR. KELLY: Well, initially when I went to design this for the Rotkviches -- DEP allows us to have a terminal area out there of 160 square feet, and that's basically the design of that, which gives you room to walk around. And I guess you could stick some benches out there and some umbrellas, the next person coming along, but that's going to crowd that area. It's only 8 feet -- almost 8-4 wide. You start putting benches or any kind - anything out there, and it's going to crowd that area. It would make it very difficult. This is kind of meant for egress and getting in and out of the boat, just pulling it up alongside there. And the way that the jet ski or the flats boat's set up, it's -- that's for shallow water area, jet skis and -- or primarily the flats boat, and they have flat front ends, and they aren't very large. So it's set up for a smaller vessel. And I did choose the smallest lift that I could get as far as the cradle in order to set that up. I'd have to order a special lift. But if we took that and moved it out, then we've got -- I mean, we would have ample depth. I think we've got ample depth where it is. But if this is contingent on moving it, I could go to Mr. Rotkvich and tell him that's what we had to do, but -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I mean, we can take a poll before we vote, and if you want to continue it again, come back with a more acceptable design that puts it for two slips and not makes it appear as though three, and move this whole thing around, I don't have a problem with that. I think you have a right to put a dock there, and you have a right for a boat or two, up to what the code says. But I think this will lead 25 excessiveness that goes beyond the code, and I'm not sure why we need to open the door. But without voting, what's the thoughts on the board? Melissa, we'll start with you. COMMISSIONER AHERN: I'm comfortable with it as it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Brad? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I don't think it's there yet. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Donna? COMMISSIONER CARON: I brought up the issue the last time around. I don't think it's there yet. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't either. Bob? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yeah. It needs to be resized. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Karen? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I think if it's acceptable to the owners, maybe it should be revised. Either way. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. We've got about fIve -- most likely fIve no votes if we go forward. And I think you've been back here twice, and I'm sorry. It doesn't seem to be coming out right this time. Maybe the third time it will work. Do you want to give it a shot and ask for a continuance? MR. KELLY: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Is there a motion to accept their continuance? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So moved. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Second by Mr. Murray. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. Page 13 - ~, '- I 16 l 1 B 5 July 1,2010 , , COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries, 6-0. Item #9B PETITION: BD-PL20l0-544. JOHNSON BOAT DOCK CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Next advertised public hearing is boat dock PL201O-544, Erik Johnson, and it's at 25 Pelican Street East. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any disclosures on the part of the Planning Commission? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think -- boy, last week -- or the last couple of weeks have been busy, but I believe I called Turrell's office to ask a question. I don't even remember what the question was. Rocky? MR. SCOFIELD: We didn't talk. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, it wasn't you. And -- a girl on the phone, and something was missing and -- but anyway. Just being safe, I thought I'd just mention that. MR. SCOFIELD: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Go ahead, sir. MR. SCOFIELD: For the record, Rocky ScofIeld, representing Erik Johnson, the owner and applicant. This -- the overhead is -- shows you the location that's on East Pelican Street in Isles of Capri. Where you see it says county aerial, that's the Marco River, is on the back side in Snook Bay. This shows the lot with the proposed dock on it. If -- just -- to refresh your memory, this is a -- I'll put it up here in just a second. The dock just to the east, as you're looking right there to the right of the blue dock, the proposed dock, that's an existing dock. I was here in February and we got a BDE for Mrs. Lehman (phonetic), which is next door. The old dock straddled the property line, and that dock is being -- is coming out as we speak. That shows you a little bit better how the old dock -- it's got a boathouse on the end, then it's got an L dock coming off on Mrs. Lehman's property. That's being ripped out now. Mrs. Lehman's dock is going in right now. This is very similar, so -- to what we did back then. Zoom out on that, Ray. Okay. This shows, in the white, that's Mrs. Lehman's dock that you approved in February. The dock in the middle on the property line, all of that's coming out, and to the left there, on the west side, is the Erik Johnson dock. We're asking for a 60-foot extension, for a total of SO feet out. You can see the sandbar, the shoaling in that area. It's aquatic preserve, so the end of dock is at minus four mean low water, which is required by the state. He's putting in two boats; they meet the setbacks. It's -- all the docks in this area go out anywhere from 50 to 130 feet. And that's just the overhead showing and -- with the distances out of all the docks in the area. The only other thing that Mr. Johnson did -- and a lot of people on this street in this area, they had land that was ecreeded (phonetic) out in front of their property line. So he had to go and get the certifIcate from the board of trusties, the Internal Improvement Trust Fund at the state, where they give the certifIcate for lands fIlled prior to 1975. The state -- it's kind of like a quitclaim deed -- I've told you this before -- but it's not. It's just, the state has no claim on it. So in the county records, now the property line is extended out to the mean high water line, and that's -- the measurements are measured from the mean high water line now, which is basically viewed as the applicant's property. And those are the distance we were showing you. The proposed dock doesn't go out nearly as far as the existing dock that was on the -- straddling the property Page 14 16 1185 July 1,2010 line there. So I'll answer any questions that you have. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody have any questions? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yep. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Rocky, Ms. Lehman's new dock, how far out will that one go? MR. SCOFIELD: The dock that was approved? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yes. MR. SCOFIELD: I had it on one drawing here. Just a second. Okay. Here it is, okay. Excuse me. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Still going out. MR. SCOFIELD: The Lehman's dock is 90 feet out. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: And so why did you choose to -- because looking at what appears to be the undersoil there, why did you choose to come out only as far as you did relative to Ms. Lehman's? MR. SCOFIELD: Well, the Lehman's dock, again, you're limited by the state to go out to minus 4 feet mean low water. On the Lehman dock, the front of that dock is at minus 4 feet, and then we're going out another 12 feet for the lift, which they allow. And Mr. Johnson wanted to bring his boats straight in and out. To do that -- so not to interfere with Lehman's boats coming in and out, and it just works out better this way. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Good. I'm satisfIed. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Brad? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Yeah. And Rocky, to support that, I think you coordinated the two docks, because if you did go out further, you'd have -- start to cause trouble for her on the inside lift there, so this is working out perfect. MR. SCOFIELD: Yep. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Rocky, the Lehman docks, what is the length of the boats that we approved for those docks; do you remember? MR. SCOFIELD: Yeah. It was a flats boat on the inside. I think it was like a 20 -- like a 2S-foot boat on the outside and maybe an IS-foot boat on the inside, something like that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What's -- what size lot width did they have there? MR. SCOFIELD: Those lots are 60 feet. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So Lehman's received an approval with two boats greater than 50 percent of the width? MR. SCOFIELD: That's correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Because I notice this one's got the same problem. MR. SCOFIELD: Right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You're looking at a -- 15 feet of boat. MR. SCOFIELD: And that happens on most -- on most BDEs we come in front of you on these small lots. We have lots that are only, some of them, 30 feet or 40,50 feet, and the boats usually exceed that, and that's a criteria not met. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Before I continue, does anybody else have any questions they wanted to ask? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then Rocky, in your secondary criteria it says, the criterion met, and it's talking about special conditions involving water depth related to the subject property, and your answer is, the proposed dock was designed to leave the existing mangroves along the shoreline undisturbed. I can't tell by that aerial. Are there -- where are the existing mangroves? MR. SCOFIELD: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I mean, I think your reason is because you need -- MR. SCOFIELD: You're reading -- that's the staff report. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. MR. SCOFIELD: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's what we're supposed to be reading. MR. SCOFIELD: Well, you guys get copies of our application? Page 15 16illB5i July 1,2010 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Yes. MR. SCOFIELD: You do, okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But you can make anything up you want, so I'd rather read the staff reports. MR. SCOFIELD: Well, the staff report's not always what you say. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know. MR. SCOFIELD: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's the advantage. MR. SCOFIELD: There are some mangroves on there. You know, the -- obviously -- I know what you're getting at and I knew this question would come up. There's -- the extensive shoaling is the main reason here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. MR. SCOFIELD: So that criteria, I know, is probably questionable. It's a natural shoreline. It's not some-- it's got a few -- riprap rock on it, and it's got mangroves. The mangroves are to the west of the dock. They're along the shoreline there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, it shows the fringe, the mangrove fringe and where they lie, but I didn't see that as our secondary meeting -- I didn't see that as the reason why you met second criteria number one. I think your reason was because you had to get out that far for the depth that you're trying to achieve, not mangroves. MR. SCOFIELD: That's exactly right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Is there any way we can correlate the removal of the Lehman's old dock with the installation of this new one? I'm concerned that the Lehrnans could leave theirs and -- MR. SCOFIELD: No, it's coming out now. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And you could have -- it is coming out now? MR. SCOFIELD: That's what I said earlier. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I heard you say that, but I meant -- now means you might have gotten approval to take it out. MR. SCOFIELD: They're building -- they're building Lehman's dock right now. The L dock there is obviously gone, and the boathouse and everything else is being torn out. The contractor is there on site. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. That's the questions I have at this time. Thank you. Get staff report. MR. SAWYER: Good morning, Commissioners. For the record, Michael Sawyer, senior planner with Growth Management Zoning Section. We are recommending approval of the Johnson boat dock this morning. If you have any questions, I'm here to answer what I can. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody have any questions of staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I don't hear any. Thank you, Michael. MR. SA YWER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Is there any further comments from the Planning Commission? If not, is there any public speakers? MR. BELLOWS: No speakers have registered. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody in the public wish to comment? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll close the public hearing and entertain a motion from the Planning Commission. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll do it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I move we approve BD-PL20l0- --let me make sure I get the right one-- yeah, -544 the Johnson dock. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Commissioner Schiffer, seconded by Commissioner Murray. Page 16 , , .1 16 It! W5 July I, 2010 Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm certainly -- this is refIning the dock length and width and deck area to the minimum. I don't have a problem with it. So I'm going to be in favor of the motion. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The motion carries, 6-0. MR. SCOFIELD: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Item #9C PETITION: CU-PL2009-58. LARGA Y PROPERTIES. LLC. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Next item up is CU-PL2009-58, Largay Properties, LLC. It's the collection and transfer site for the resource recovery in the east side of Pheasant Roost Trail south of Frangipani Avenue. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Disclosures on the part of the Planning Commission? I think I had a conversation Wayne Arnold -- he was acting as the secretary for Rich Yovanovich, trying to fInd out if there was any concerns -- and I said my only concern was Richard couldn't pick up the phone and dial himself. And with that, we'll continue. Mr. Y ovanovich? MR. YOV ANOVICH: Good morning. For the record, Rich Y ovanovich. I didn't know I was employing Mr. Arnold, but I'm glad to see he did a good job of trying to get ahold of you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: He did, so. MR. YOV ANOVICH: Wayne is -- Wayne is here to help me with this petition, and so is Lou Sterachi, who is employed by the petitioner, if you have any questions regarding this particular petition. I've put on the visualizer an overall aerial of -- basically to the north is Golden Gate Estates, and you can see in the yellow is the applicable property which is zoned agricultural, and it's within the receiving lands of the rural fringe mixed-use district. We gain our access off Golden Gate Boulevard, which was on the visualizer to the north, come down 10th, 10th Street Southeast, and then we take -- you see that kind of dirt road, if you will, which is called Frangipani, which will then ultimately get you to Pheasant Roost, which is the private road that provides access to the property. The current property owner has owned the property for about fIve years. It's a wholesale nursery. And in that fIve-year period, essentially the entire fIve-year period, they also have a recycling business where they go out and they collect oils and food parts that they bring to the site, they put in a tank, and then they -- someone comes and - or their east coast operation comes over, empties the tank and takes everything for processing over on the east coast of Florida. They've been doing that for, you know, about fIve years. There really haven't been any complaints. There's -- someone complained, I guess, to Code Enforcement, thinking it was actually a sewer septic operation, I guess, which pointed out that that -- you needed a conditional use to do this operation we're in to get the conditional use for this particular operation. Page 17 " ~. 10 l 1 B 5 July 1,2010 There's approximately fIve trips a day related to this. The current employees that work there, actually who run the nursery, will also run this operation. So it's not fIve additional employees. It's the fIve current employees that run this operation. We had our neighborhood information meeting. There was nothing of note. Once people understood what we were doing and had been doing it for a while, I don't think there's any objections from the neighbors. In a nutshell, that's what we're asking for, and we're here to hopefully rectify the Code Enforcement case that's pending on the property. If you have any questions from me, Wayne, or Lou regarding this particular application, we'd be happy to answer them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any questions from the Planning Commission? Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Rich, where are the customers for this pickup mostly? MR. YOV ANOVICH: They're in Collier County. I mean, various restaurants throughout Collier County, grocery stores. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Because the only problem I have with the thing is it seems inefficient to go out through the urban area, gather the stuff, and then bring it deep into the middle of the agricultural Estates area. MR. YOV ANOVICH: Well, they're an ongoing nursery. To then go and buy another piece of property in an industrial portion of town is, you know, economically-- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: No fun. MR. YOV ANOVICH: What's that? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: No fun to do that. MR. YOV ANOVICH: It's not -- it's just not economically viable. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. But again, the only negative I have on the whole thing -- and it's not a fatal negative -- is that it seems like an inefficient location to put this, because it's gathering stuff in another area, bringing it in the middle of this, and then somebody has to come pull it out of another area and go into the middle of this area and bring it out. So that's all. MR. YOV ANOVICH: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions of the applicant? Richard, I have one. Apparently there was -- and I really hate anonymous callers, but you had an anonymous call, a complaint on this to Code Enforcement about a sewer -- basically a sewer pumping business as being located in that location. Did Code Enforcement fmd a sewer pumping business at that location? MR. YOV ANOVICH: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then why are we here today? If the complaint was about -- and, anonymous, for whatever that's worth -- was about a sewer pumping business and they went out and did not fInd one there, where is the public, health, satisfy, and welfare concern that we're here today about? MR. YOV ANOVICH: Well, technically, in order to do this operation on agricultural land, you have to get a conditional use. And when Code Enforcement came out and saw what we were doing, even though it was a different complaint, I guess they were not in a position to ignore what was going on, and we're addressing that situation and rectifying that situation. Obviously my client didn't know that they needed to do that or else they would have done it ahead of time. But we are where we are, and we're trying to fIx this and trying to do it as quickly and as inexpensively as we can to get -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What did it cost to get here today? MR. YOV ANOVICH: I don't want to ask Lou. I forget what the application -- Wayne, do you remember the application fee? You know, several thousand dollars. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR. YOV ANOVICH: I mean, every bit often, probably. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And this is a resource recovery that's probably a valuable thing for everybody involved, and for no complaint against this operation he paid probably $10,000 to get through the process to be here today. Page 18 \. ,~ 161185, July 1, 2010 MR. YOV ANOVICH: Right. And if it -- just as an aside, you know, as you're dealing with the Land Development Code and times -- maybe something out of a certain size should be a permitted use versus a conditional use. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We need to fIx our code. MR. YOV ANOVICH: Right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I mean, that's a given. And if that's what it takes to get these kind of things to stop happening, it needs -- I mean, there can be criteria, but this just seems so innocuous, I don't even know why it's $10,000 in damages. It's just phenomenal. But anyway. Anybody else have any questions of staff -- I mean, of the applicant? If not, we'll hear staff report. MS. GUNDLACH: Good morning, Commissioners. And for the record, Nancy Gundlach again, Principal Planning with the Department of Land Development Services. And Commissioners, we -- staff is recommending approval of this Talimaster's (phonetic) conditional use station. It is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. And it would be my pleasure to answer any questions you might have. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Murray? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Nancy, hi. Good morning again. MS. GUNDLACH: Good morning. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Page 7 of 10 of your report on item number four -- and while you're getting there, I'll read it. The effect the conditional use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. And I noted that while you referenced all the other particulars, you made no reference whatsoever to the odor issue. Now, I don't know that there is an odor issue, but I was curious why you didn't even mention it or reference it as being part of it. Is it our practice when we're going through to actually have somebody go to site and evaluate the criteria? MS. GUNDLACH: It's not common practice to go out to site. I can tell you that I did attend the neighborhood information meeting, and I did hear some statements from the adjacent neighbors, and one of the neighbors did state that there is no odor from this facility. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I read that. MS. GUNDLACH: Yeah. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Okay. But I was curious because you didn't include it in your comment, and that's very specifIc as to the four criteria that are there. MS. GUNDLACH: Okay. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: So I wanted to qualify that for the record, that there is no odor issue that has been made a point of. And so we can construe that this is a clean and effective operation. Thank you. MS. GUNDLACH: That's true. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else have any questions of the staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you, Nancy. MS. GUNDLACH: Very welcome. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ray, do we have any public speakers? MR. BELLOWS: No speakers have registered. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any member of the public wish to speak on this item? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. With that, we'll close the public hearing and entertain a motion. Anybody? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll make it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr. Schiffer? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I move we forward CU-PL2009-58, Talimaster's Collection Station, with a recommendation of approval. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made and seconded, made by Mr. Schiffer, seconded by Mr. Murray. Page 19 , , i , "" ; \ ; -~ 10 llB~5 July 1,2010 Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries, 6-0. Heidi, you need about 15 minutes with Bruce? Item #SG (Continued from earlier in the meeting) PETITION: PUDZ-A-PL2009-2031. ROCK CREEK HOLGINGS: MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD MS. ASHTON: No. Bruce has some proposed language. Is he there? I can put it on the visualizer or he can do that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, then -- we'll continue then the item that was on consent for PUDZ-A-PL2009-203l. It's Item SG, Rock Creek Holdings, LLC. This is a consent item. This is just supposed to be a discussion of the meaning of the Planning Commission's previous motion. MR. ANDERSON: That's the language that we came up with. We worked with Ms. Deselem and Ms. Ashton, and it's -- I think it's acceptable to all of us and believe it will reflect the discussion this morning. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Comments from the Planning Commission? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Looks fme. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Yeah. I just want to make sure -- I mean, you're going to be offering it for sale at the time of permit, according to this, correct? In other words, that is when you're -- the beginning of the date of the permit, you're going to start selling the thing, and then six months after the CO it hits the free market. In other words, is there any way you would not put these up for sale prior to four months or anything? I mean, they will be -- does this thing guarantee they'll go to sale at the issuance of the building permit? MR. ANDERSON: Well, I think it does. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Heidi, from a legal technical aspect, could they get a CO and just not put it up for sale and in four months notify the county that it doesn't sell? MS. ASHTON: I don't believe so. It indicates after the building permit is issued they have to put it up for sale. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. They shall be -- MS. ASHTON: And then it continues until six months after the CertifIcate of Occupancy. So there's a six-month period that it should be offered for sale. MR. ANDERSON: Actually it will be more than six since we have to start when the building permit's issued. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And then just as a cleanup question, how do we know -- when we say they will offer it for sale, what signifIes offering for sale? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do we know? MR. HANCOCK: For the record, Tim Hancock. In order for the units to qualify for affordable housing or gap housing, the county has to, in essence, through the Housing Department, sign off on that. They have to be notifIed in the process in order for the units to qualify as affordable housing. So that process occurs as the building is coming out of the ground or even before the building permit is issued. If there are, for example, four units in the building that you wish to offer as affordable units in order to meet Page 20 I . "\ :1 '-... ., 16 , 18511 July 1,2010 your requirements, you have to notify the county ahead of time. So there's a very close relationship when you're doing affordable housing units between the developer and the county Housing Department. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And Tim, I have -- since -- Ijust remembered something. I was at the Professional Bull Fighter's Rodeo not too long ago, and a lady came up, and her name is Donna Treadwell. She lives just a block or two down from that, and she has a concern over water management. They just bought a house there, and they want to make sure that the water management issues are addressed on your property. I assured her they were based on South Florida rules, and also knowing what you and your fIrm do. Would you have any -- if! ernailed you her address, would you have any objection to getting in touch with her and just reassure her before you go to the Board of County Commissioners -- MR. HANCOCK: We'd be happy to. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- where that's at? Okay. I'll do that after the meeting then. Thank you. Anybody else have any questions of the applicant? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Question on bull fIghting, but we'll skip it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. It was interesting. Three people got hurt that night. It wasn't a good night for the bull fIghters. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I thought it was bull riding, not fIghting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Bull riding, I'm sorry. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: I fIgured you'd do the bull fIghting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN : Yeah. Bull riding, you're right; not bull fIghting. I got mixed up on that one. But it seemed like -- with everybody injured, it almost seemed like it was bull fIghting. I've never seen so many people go down in one night. Staff report? Oh, this is a consent agenda. You're not going to counter him. Nobody has anything against Bruce, huh? Okay. With all that, is there a motion from the Planning Commission? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'll do it. I move we forward PUDZ-A-PL-2009-2031, Rock Creek Holdings, with a recommendation of approval. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Commissioner Schiffer, second by Commissioner Murray, and I'm assuming it's subject to the new language that we reviewed here on the screen? COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Clearly. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. Nodded okay from both parties. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All--Iosing my voice. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motions carries, 6-0. Thank you all. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Got to be a record. CHAIRMAN STRAIN : Yeah, for that many, we did pretty good here this morning. Terri, we're going to have you short on hours. Old business, there isn't anything listed. Anybody? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: New business? Nothing's listed. Anybody? (No response.) Page 21 (' ~. 16 11 B 5 July 1,2010 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Public comment? Anybody remaining in the public? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: None. Is there a motion to adjourn? COMMISSIONER AHERN: Motion to adjourn. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Ahem. Seconded by? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. -- oh, good. Ms. Homiak, both ends. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER CARON: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER MURRAY: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries, 6-0. You know, there's a balance on this board. We've got two ladies on both ends and one in the middle to keep the peace. This is going to -- this is good. Thank you. ***** There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10: IS am. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONERS These minutes approved by the board on ~ - Q. r \ 1:> as presented v or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICES, INe., BY TERRI LEWIS. Page 22 Fiala Halas Hemung Coyle Coletta 16 11Bq~gust18,~t()s:v:; SEP 1 7 2010 Board of County Commissioners MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTOR LICENSING BOARD Naples, Florida, August 18, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Contractor Licensing Board in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION, at Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Thomas Lykos Richard Joslin Michael Boyd Terry Jerulle Kyle Lantz Robert Meister (Excused) Patrick White Lee Horn Jon Walker (Excused) ALSO PRESENT: Patrick Neale, Attorney for the Board Robert Zachary, Assistant County Attorney Michael Ossorio, Contractor Licensing Supervisor Ian Jackson, License Compliance Officer Jamie French, Director of Operations Misc. 1 C:jies to: 16 11 B(, August 18,2010 Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes that testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. I. ROLL CALL Chairman Lykos called the meeting to order at 9:03 am Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. II. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS: None III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mr. Joslin moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Lantz. Carried unanimously 7-0. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: DATE: June 16,2010 Mr. White moved to approve the minutes of the June 16, 2010 meeting subject to the following changes: Page 5, paragraph 4, bullet point 1 - from Mr. Hardwick..." to "Mr. Hardwick..." Page 5, paragraph 5, line 2 - from... $540 and he his addressing..." to "... $540 and he is addressing. . ." Page 6, paragraph 6 - from "...August 21,2010..." to "...August 18,2010..." Second by Mr. Lantz. Carried unanimously 7-0. V. DISCUSSION (A) End of Month Report - June & July 2010 The Board reviewed the "Contractor Licensing Monthly Report" updated through July 31, 2010. Included in the reports were pie charts for the June and July top 10 violations by Category. The Board requested future reports indicate actual budget figures vs. projected budget figures. Michael Ossorio noted Staff is in the process of producing this data for future reports. Mr. White noted he has resolved any possible issues regarding a potential conflict of interest he may have had regarding a Board he sits on that was awarded a Tourist Development Council Grant. The Board requested Staff amend the Contractor Licensing Application to include a question which requires an applicant to disclose if hey have ever had a license denied, revoked, found in violation, issued with conditions, etc. (or similar language.) 2 16 11B~1 August 18, 2010 VI. NEW BUSINESS: (A) Orders of the Board (Signing) Ian Jackson noted the purpose of the item was for the Chairman to sign Orders for further processing of unpaid citations issued to various parties for violations to the Contractor Licensing Ordinance. Mr. Joslin moved to approve the Orders of the Board. Second by Mr. White. Carried unanimously 7-0. (B) Ricardo Leyva - Contesting Citation Citation No.: 5576 Date: June 24, 2010 Description of Violation: Unlicensed Hurricane (Shutter) Installation The individuals to testify in the hearing were sworn in Jonathon Brody, Attorney represented Mr. Leyva noting the following: . Mr. Leyva was issued the citation for installation of Hurricane Shutters without a Collier County License. . The installation was being performed under the Jim Walter Exemption, Florida Statute 489.117.4D. . The exemption requires no local license is required by a contractor if the work is being performed is on a single family residence under the supervision of a certified residential contractor. . The work was being performed on a single family residence under the supervision of the company Atrium Windows and Doors. . Based on this fact they contend no local license is required for the installation. Karen Clements, Collier County License Compliance Officer provided an overview of the citation highlighting the following: . On June 24, 2010 she received a complaint of potential unlicensed contractor activity at Lot 270 of the Marbella development. . Upon arriving on the scene she encountered Mr. Leyva installing hurricane shutters. . No other individuals were present on site. . Mr. Leyva stated his company is Portelles Services Corp. . Mr. Leyva stated he was working for Atrium and Doors and Windows. . She contacted Tim Robinson of Atrium Doors and Windows and notified him there was to be a stop work order placed on the job. . She determined GL Homes was the actual holder of the permit and contacted Randy Critchley, Superintendant and informed him of the situation. . Mr. Critchley stated they had a contract for services with Atrium Doors and Windows for the work in question. 3 16 I 1 B ~UguSl18, 2010 Jonathon Brody noted: . Previous legal cases and Attorney General Opinions (Florida Builders Assoc. vs. Saint Johns County, 9/14/2005 and a latest 2001 Attorney General Opinions) indicate the Jim Walter Exemption prevails if the requirements are met. . In his opinion, Mr. Leyva meets the requirements of the exemptions. . He provided a copy of the contract between Mr. Leyva and Atrium Windows and Doors. . The exemption does not require "direct supervision" of the individual providing the services under the direction of the certified residential contractor. Tim Robinson, Atrium Windows and Doors noted on the day of the event, he informed the Investigating Officer, he was aware Mr. Leyva was not a Collier County licensed contractor and was working under the direction of Atrium Doors and Windows via the Jim Walter exemption. He provided an overview on the process for a typical installation: . The Area Manager for Atrium Doors and Windows measures the windows for which the shutter installations are to occur. . Atrium Doors and Windows fabricates the shutters. . The installer picks up the shutters, hardware, detailed plans and specifications to complete installation of the shutters. . The installer returns to the site to perform the installation in accordance with the plans and specifications. . If the installer has any questions, he may contact the Area Manager at any time. . The installer is required to photograph all work completed. . Upon completion of the installation, the installer notifies the Area Manager who conducts an on-site inspection to ensure the work is completed in accordance with the company's plans and specifications. . Via this process, the Company deems the installation "supervised" in accordance with the Jim Walter exemption. Discussion occurred regarding the definition of "supervision" as it applies to the exemption. Jonathon Brody noted the Statute outlines the term "supervision," not "direct supervision" when qualifying a criteria for an exemption. With the lack of a definition of "supervision" in the Statute, he recommended the formal reference be the dictionary which cites the term "oversight" as a synonym for "supervision. To meet the definition "supervision," the overseer is not required to be supervising on a constant basis as the work is being performed. Mr. White noted the case and Attorney Generals Opinions cited by Mr. Brody, did not address the definition of "supervision." 4 16 j 6 1. August 18,2010 Patrick Neale, Attorney for the Board noted it is the prerogative of the Contractor Licensing Board to define "adequate supervision." The case in question was remanded to trial court, with no specific decision on the case, rather exemption exists and needs to meet 3 criteria under the Statute. Chairman Lykos noted there are 3 requirements for an exemption under the Statute. 1. The work performed does not fall under a specific trade listed by State Statute. The trade in question is exempted within the Statute. 2. The work be performed on a single family residence or townhouse. The work in question was being performed on a single family residence. 3. The work is performed under the supervision of a certified or registered general building or residential contractor. Testimony indicates Atrium Windows and Doors is a certified residential contractor. Michael Ossorio noted Mr. Robinson, holder of the license should be the supervisor of the installation, not an employee such as an Area Manager. Mr. Lantz noted, in his experience through County Licensing with an Owner Builder permit, supervision is allowed via a cell phone, etc. Michael Ossorio noted the Owner Builder permit does require "direct supervision" by the owner on the job site. In 1993, the County determined under the Jim Walter Act, the supervisor needs to "be on the job site within a certain amount of time," which was deemed to be "within 15 minutes." Jonathon Brody expressed concern Mr. Ossorio is possibly inserting interpretations of the Statute that do not exist, such as the requirement of being on the job site within 15 minutes or on the job site while work is being performed. The Statute clearly states "supervision," and this is the definition in question. Since 1993, there has been the advent of new technology (cell phones, cell phones with questions, laptop computers, etc.) He questions if the general policy is still realistic and the Board should consider this under the determination of the term "supervision" as defined in the Statute. Mr. Leyva meets all 3 of the criteria outlined in the Statute. Chairman Lykos noted a statement signed by Mr. Leyva following issuance of the citation indicates he supervises and cleans up the job site by himself independently and questions how he considers himself "supervised" by Atrium Doors and Windows. Mr. Leyva indicated he intended the statement to mean while he is on the job site, he is his "own supervisor" and responsible for completing the work in accordance with the plans and specifications and ensuring the job site is cleaned up properly, etc. There is always a person from Atrium "supervising" the work including directions on how to install the product and supplies the plans and specifications. The Area Manager responsible for his supervision is Pedro Roderiquez. Chairman Lykos noted in the case of defining "supervision" for work being completed under a license exemption, the Board should utilize a more restrictive definition for the determination of adequate supervision. 5 16 liB bAUgust 18,2010 Mr. Jerulle noted with lack of a definition in the Statute, the "Industry Standard Definition" should be utilized which deems supervision as the supervising person be present on the job site while the job is being performed. Mr. Lantz moved to rescind the Citation (No. 5576). Second by Mr. White. Mr. Lantz indicated the work performed meets the requirement of the Statute for an exemption. The licensed company provided the measurements, product and plans and specifications required to perform the installation. The completed work is inspected by the Company. Based on his licensed contracting experience, "supervision" may be via a cell phone, cell phone with camera, etc. Motionfailed 1 'yes" - 6 "no." Chairman Lykos, Mr. White, Mr. Jerulle, Mr. Joslin, Mr. Boyd and Mr. Horn voted "no. " Patrick Neale stated with the decision, the issuance of the citation is upheld. Break: lO:35am Reconvened: lO:49am VII. OLD BUSINESS: (A) Sonia Pajaro - Review of Credit Report (Six Month Review) The presenter was sworn in Sonia Pajaro submitted a letter to the Board regarding the status of her credit rating dated June 16,2010 and attached credit Report for consideration. Michael Ossorio stated she has been on probation since May of2009. Staffhas reviewed the Report which indicates an improvement in credit score rating. In addition, there have been no consumer complaints on here work. He recommends Ms. Pajaro's license be removed from probationary status. Mr. White moved to approve the Staff recommendation of removing Ms. Pajaro's license from probationary status. Second by Mr. Jerulle. Carried unanimously 7 - 0 (B) Colleen Martinez - Review of Credit Report (Six Month Review) The presenter was sworn in Colleen Martinez submitted a copy of her credit report for consideration. Michael Ossorio stated she has been on probation since June of 2009 and Staff has reviewed the Report which indicates an improvement in credit score rating. In addition, there have been no consumer complaints on her work. He recommends Ms. Martinez's license be removed from probationary status. 6 16 I 1. BA~ust 18,2010 Mr. Joslin moved to approve the Staff recommendation of removing Ms. Martinez's license from probationary status. Second by Mr. Lantz. Carried unanimously 7 - O. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (A) Case 2010 - 03 Jeffery A. Wiles - D.BA DJAX, LLC Ian Jackson, License Compliance Officer stated he has received an email from Jeffery Wiles, dated August 16, 2010, requesting a continuance of the hearing. Chairman Lykos expressed concern the case has been on going since 2008 and recommended the item be heard today. Patrick Neale stated this is the first request by the Appellant and it has been Board policy in the past to grant a continuance if it is the first request by the Appellant. He recommended the Board grant a one time continuance to the case. Ian Jackson noted officials ofthe City of Naples filed the complaint and they do not object to the continuance. Mr. White moved to continue the case to the next Contractor Licensing Board's meeting (September 15, 2010), and that no further continuances be granted to the Appellant. Second by Mr. Joslin. Carried unanimously 6 'yes" -1 "no." Chairman Lykos voted "no." Patrick Neale recommended Staffre-notice the hearing and indicate the action taken by the Board today. IX. REPORTS: None X. NEXT MEETING DATE: Wednesday September 15,2010 - W. Harmon Turner Building, 3rd floor (Commissioners Meeting Room) - 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, fl34112 (Courthouse Complex) There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of the Chair at 11:01 AM. COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTOR LICENSING BOARD 7 16 I 1 B 6AUgUSI 18,2010 ~)'7 L q- y 11.<'" Chairman, 'fIrnUl..S b.rk.u", /.( '/' ~ /-......r'l.. These Minutes were approved by the Board/Chairman on as presented , or as amended 8 ., RECE\VED SEP 2 0 20\0 8'6 / Fiala Halas Henning Coyle Coletta MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTOR LICENSING BOARD August 18,2010 soard of Counti commIsSioners Naples, Florida, August 18, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Contractor Licensing Board in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in WORKSHOP SESSION, at Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Thomas Lykos Richard Joslin Michael Boyd Terry Jerulle Kyle Lantz Robert Meister (Excused) Patrick White Lee Horn Jon Walker (Excused) ALSO PRESENT: Patrick Neale, Attorney for the Board Robert Zachary, Assistant County Attorney Michael Ossorio, Contractor Licensing Supervisor Ian Jackson, License Compliance Officer Misc. Corres: Date: ltern,: 1 C ~~;es ') .,. 16 11 A~~18'2010 Chairman Lykos called the Workshop to order at 10:50 am following the Regular Meeting. Michael Ossorio, Contracting Licensing Supervisor noted the purpose of the Workshop was to gamer Contractor Licensing Board input on amendments proposed by Staff to Ordinance 2006-46. The Contractor License Board and Staff reviewed the proposed amendments with the Board recommending language and content revisions to the document. Mr. Horn left the meeting at 11 :30 am Mr. White left the meeting at 12: 16 pm Michael Ossorio noted the proposed changes to the draft document will be revised by Staff, and returned to the Board for approval or further review at a future meeting. There being no further business for the good ofthe County, the Workshop was adjourned by the order of the Chair at 12:25 PM. COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTOR LICENSING BOARD L7h '& ~ (/y... Chairman, TlrolUA5 Lykes /<.;1_ L.c...rl, These Minutes were approved by the Board/Chairman on as presented , or as amended 2 - . - .. 16J 187 =:& ~ Henning~ Coyle Coletta ~ ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE M.S.T.U. . 4 FOREST LAKES ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 I~E~~:~im~ August 25,2010 Aaenda BY: ....................... I. Call to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes - July 7,2010 V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report - Gloria Herrera B. Gordon River Extension Maintenance C. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard, Chris Tillman / Malcolm Pimie D. Community Speed Limit VI. Landscape Architect Report A. Cul-de-Sac Project B. Sidewalk/Lighting/Street Tree Project VII. Old Business VIII. New Business A. Floating Islands B. New Project Proposal (F-64 Project) X. Public Comments XI. Adjournment Next meeting is September 8, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Growth Management Division - Construction & Maintenance 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Misc. Correa: Naples, FL 34104 Date: () l;)..., I 0 !tem.1~lLL. e;.r 1 16 I 1 &7 / FOREST LAKES ROADW A Y AND DRAINAGE M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 July 7,2010 Minutes I. Call to order Meeting was called to order at 1 :30 p.m. by George Fogg. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Robert Jones (Excused), George Fogg, Harold Bergdoll, William Seabury, Dick Barry County: Darryl Richard-Project Manager, Pam Lulich-Manager Landscape Operations, Michelle Arnold-Director A TM, Gloria Herrera- Budget Analyst Other: Chris Tilman-Malcolm Pirnie, Scott Windham-Windham Studio, Darlene Lafferty-Juristaff III. Approval of Agenda Harold Bergdoll moved to approve the Agenda as submitted. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. Approval of Minutes - May 19, 2010 Change: Pg 4, VI. B., paragraph 5, should read: "Dick" Barry William Seabury moved to approve minutes of May 19, 2010 as amended. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. V. Transportation Services A. Budget Report-Gloria Herrera reviewed the following: (See attached) o Available Operating Expense $8,088.21 Discussion took place on monies remaining in Operating Expense. It was agreed to transfer $20,000.00 from Capital Outlay (other Contractual) to cover various Maintenance items. Harold Bergdoll moved to transfer $20,000.00 from Capital Outlay to Operating Expense. Second by Dick Barry. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. 1 , . 16 11 B 7 B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard I Chris Tilman - Malcolm Pimie - The Forest Lakes Master Project List was distributed. (See attached) Proiect (F-53) Quail Run Lake Shoreline Restoration and Stabilization Darryl Richard reported additional cost related to rock removal will be tracked and updated weekly: (See attached) o Current cost $10,415.00 (as of 7/2/10) o A Change Order additional cost for rock removal will be processed at Project completion - BCC approval is required for the Change Order Scott Windham reviewed Windham Studio Status Report. (See attached) (F-58) Sidewalk Proiect o Submitted 60% Construction Drawings for the following: (See attached) - Planting and Irrigation in the Layout Plans - Striping plans and related details for Sidewalks - Lighting Plans o 60% Budget Estimates were reviewed: (See attached) - Green Screen (900 ft. along WOO(lshire Lane) is included in the Landscape / Irrigation Estimate - The Project was initially planned as non-Irrigated - A shaded Garden area was introduced which requires Irrigation George Fogg expressed concerns on the Landscape /Irrigation Budget Estimates: o Excessive expense for Irrigation o Requested minimizing the amount of proposed Green Screen footage Darryl Richard responded: o The Irrigation System will be converted to an Independent System - The MSTU will have complete control (in the proposed Project area) to ensure installed Landscape Materials are properly Irrigated o The 60% Budget Estimates were ball park figures o Staff emailed a detailed Report (by James Abney) to the Committee for review (on 7n/10) Scott Windham resumed (Sidewalk Project Report): o Landscape I Irrigation Estimate Sub Total- $547,064.50 o Sidewalk Construction Estimate Sub Total- $338,391.72 - Estimate does not reflect a $38,000.00 increase due to Traffic maintenance, demolition, and installation of Bahia Sod - Revised Estimate Sub Total- $376.705.00 2 1B 7' o Lighting Construction Estimate Sub Total - $666,885.00 o Project Grand Total - $1,552,341.22 (not including the $38,000.00 increase) Discussion ensued to determine if sufficient monies were available to fund the Sidewalk Project. Darryl Richard reviewed the Master Project list outlining allocated monies on current Projects: (See attached) o (F-58) Sidewalk Project 60% Cost estimate - $1,590,655.00 - Includes $38,000.00 increase for Construction (ABB) o (F-60) Cul de sac Project- $150,000.00 Scott Windham perceives the allocated Funds for Project (F-60) are sufficient. Darryl Richard gave further information from the Budget Worksheet: o Remaining Estimated Bond Issue Fund $100,000.00 o Monies are accruing in Reserves $2,400,000.00 o Capital Improvements $1,500,000.00 (alloted for Project activity) o FY10 Carry Forward will be confirmed with the Budget Office After much discussion it was determined adequate Funds are available to construct the (F-58) Sidewalk Project. Scott Windham continued with the Sidewalk Project: Landscape Materials o Flowering Trees (smaller species) will be installed at the Entry - Cassia - Queen Crape Myrtle o Rows of Royal Palm Trees in the Median (primary entrance) o Hedge Serpentine down the Median center (primary entrance) - and as perimeter hedge (along Woodshire Lane) o Variety of Crown of Thorn o Coconut Palms and Queen Crape Myrtle in the Circle Islands o Golden Shower Trees o Orange Geiger Harold Bergdoll questioned if the Conceptual Plan will be presented to the Golf Course Beautification Committee for review and input. After discussion the following was agreed: o Staff will coordinate a meeting with the Golf Course Beautification Committee to introduce the Design Plans o Hold (1-2) Public Meetings for the Forest Lakes Communities - Scott Windham will give a Presentation on the Design Plans 3 . . 16 J lA, B 7 Monument Sians o Plant Materials at the Woodshire and Pine Ridge Sign - Pigmy date palms - Variegated Ginger - Wan:1 Fern - Fireball Vermillion Dick Barry left 2:40 p.m. Pam Lulich requested Scott Windham address sightlines on Pine Ridge (from Woodshire) as the County receives numerous complaints (due to the hedge.) Darryl Richard stated the sightline issue will be reviewed carefully. Dick Barry returned 2.43 p.m. Scott Windham reviewed: Project (F-50J Cui de sac Project (See attached) o Reviewed Plans for Cart staging (trash receptacle) o 30 inch concrete pad (with 6 inch curb) o Islands are non-irrigated o Plant material is centrally located in the Island o Reviewed planting scheme options and noted the following on Option 2 - Install 3 small Flowering Trees - Residents have the option to participate in Tree selection Darryl Richard stated: o Staff and Scott Windham will coordinate with individual Property Owners to review the Cui de sac Project and options o A Public Meeting will be held (October) and a Presentation will be given Chris Tilman on Master Project List: Project (F-53J Quail Run Lake Shoreline Restoration and Stabilization o Lake 7 east - a 10ft. section of corrugated pipe and various materials were removed o Lake 8 west - Complete Harold Bergdoll left 3:05 p.m. George Fogg restated the need to install littoral plantings along the shoreline to complete the project (for aesthetics.) Harold Bergdoll returned 3:08 p.m. 4 8:., Proiect (F-56) South Woodshire Ditch Improvements o P.O. was issued o Anticipate mobilization in mid August VI. Old Business A. Gordon River Maintenance Project (Stormwater Depl Project) Chris Tilman reviewed AMll Gate Drainage Basin Aerial Map: o Basin area blockage is approximately 1200 linear ft. o 1500 acres are affected by the blockage o County Funds are not available for the Project (due to reorganization of the Stormwater Division) Discussion ensued on the lack of County Funds for the Gordon River Maintenance Project. It was concluded: o The Project is outside the MSTU Boundary o Forest lakes Community is the lowest Development in the Gordon River Basin o Forest lakes is the only development adversely affected (with drainage issues) Harold Bergdoll perceives the Project is a County problem and is opposed to the MSTU Funding the Project. Michelle Arnold confirmed with the County Attorney that Funds can be allocated by the MSTU for the Project as it would benefit the Forest lakes Community. The Committee questioned why the MSTU should be responsible for 100% of the problem that was created by the 90% Industrial Area Development. Discussions continued on County Budget cuts. George Fogg questioned the severity of the situation and suggested Staff and Consultants provide recommendations to the Committee. Chris Tilman noted the Drain system is gravity based and expressed concern of structure flooding in the event of consecutive storm occurrences. He reviewed Funding Options for the Project: o MSTU Fund the Project o Confirm if County Funding is available o Apply for a State Grant citing the Project is preemptive to avoid flooding in Community George Fogg proposed Option 4 - (Promissory Note) o If the MSTU Funded the Project the County would reimburse the MSTU monies (when the economy recovered) Staff will make inquiries on Option 4 (with the County.) 5 B7 Discussion ensued on the next meeting date. It was agreed to meet at 10:00 a.m. on August 18, 2010. VII. New Business-None VIII. Public Comments-None There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned by the Vice Chainnan at 3:58 P.M. Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage MSTU Advisory Committee ,; These minutes approved by the Committee on f -:J.. 5' - 10 as presented or amended X " Next meeting is August 18,2010 at 10:00 a.m. Growth Management Division - Construction & Maintenance 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Fl 34104 6 . I I a 16 L 87 Forest Lakes MSTU Master Project List Updated August 23,2010 oject t Description Estimated Schedule Status Estimated Cost Completed Cost Differential Notes Combined old project nos.14 1 Overlay Woodshire Lane and Forest Lakes Blvd and 16 Overlay Forest Lakes Blvd.from Tennis Courts on Woodshire to Project funded by MSTU 1a Gardenia Lane and from service entrance on Woodshire Lane to Completed $610,000 $145,000 $465,000 funds,not bond revenue. Pine Ridge Road(approx.6500 I.f.) Project Completed. 1 b F-41-Restore drainage in cul-de-sacs,regrade side yards Mar-Jul 2008 Completed $1,050,000 $149,022 $900,978 Project Completed. throughout single family area 1c F-47-Overlay cul-de-sacs and Forest Lakes Blvd.from Gardenia Feb-Jul 2008 Completed Project Completed. Lane to Main Entrance 2 F-42-Overlay Quail Forest Blvd.from Main Entrance to Jan-May 2008 Completed $731,000 $88,586 $642,414 Project Completed. southern end and restore drainage Combined old project nos 4- 3 Quail Run Swale Restoration and Lake Improvements 13 3a F-43-Regrade Swale Nos.7-11 and install culverts. Total Feb 2008-May Completed $147,000 $165,715 -$18,715 Project Completed. regrade length approximately 5,974 L.F. 2009 3b F-45-Regrade Swale Nos.1-6 and install culverts. Total regrade Apr-Aug 2009 Completed mpleted with Project Completed. length approximately 8,415 L.F. Final change 3c F-45-Regrade Swale Nos.12-17. Total regrade length Apr-Aug 2009 order $333,000 $160,374 $172,626 Project Completed. approximately 11,289 L.F. processing 3d F-38-Construct engineered partitions in Lakes 8 and 10 Feb 2008-Oct Deleted Project Completed. onno 4 F-47-Overlay Forest Lakes Drive and side streets from Feb 2008-Jan Completed $495,000 $314,731 $180,269 Project Completed. Forest Lakes Blvd.to south end 2009 5 F-50-Woodshire Lane Improvements(Phase 1) Mar 2008-Aug Completed with Project Completed. 2009 3c May 2008 Sep, BCC Approved Quality Enterprises awarded 6 F-53-Quail Run Lake Shoreline Restoration and Stabilization $1,153,254.75 contract for$1,153,254.75. 2010 on 4/13/10 Project Under Construction 7 F-54-Replace culvert crossing Fairway No.5 Jun-Oct 2008 Completed $145,235 $66,328 $78,907 Project Completed. 8 F-55-Forest Lakes Blvd Improvements from Quail Forest May -Sep 2009 Completed $180,000 $68,667 $111,333 Project Completed. Blvd.to Woodshire Lane Jul 2009-Sep Project Under Haskins,Inc.awarded 9 F-56-South Woodshire Ditch Improvements $349,000 contract for$314,312, 2010 Construction mobilized to site on 8/19. 10 F-57-Drainage System Mapping and Adjustments Jul 2009-Feb Final $50,000 $50,000 $0 Project Completed. 2010 Adjustments F-58-Sidewalks,Lighting Improvements,and Roadway Aug 2009-May Delayed pending Cost estimate based on 60% 11 Tree Plantings 2010 outcome of BVO $1,590,655 design estimate from 9 issue 1Ar..ati...,,Ct,Ain,/ARR 12 F-59-Lighting Improvements Jan-May 2010 Combined with F- 58 13 F-60-Cul de sac improvements Jun 2009 May Delayed pending $150,000 Awaiting 60%cost estimate p 2010 outcome of BVO 14 F-61-Drainage system mapping Jul-Dec 2009 Combined with F- 57 15 F-62-Maintenance Dredging of Lake 8 Jan-April 2010 Completed $100,000 $143,845 -$43,845 Completed 3/26/10 16 F-63-Property Line Wall along Woodshire Lane Oct 2009 May Combined with F- 2010 58 17 F-64-Roadway Tree Plantings TBD Combined with F- 58 ORIGINAL BOND ISSUE PROCEEDS $6,068,171 BOND-FUNDED PROJECT EXPENSES AS OF $1,414,048 SEP 30,2009 BOND ISSUE FUNDS REMAINING AS OF $4,209,523 OCT 1,2009 COMMITMENTS AS OF $1,941,948 JULY 7,2010 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES AS OF $392,964 JULY 7,2011 ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE PROJECT EXPENSES $1,740,655 REMAINING ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE FUNDS REMAINING $133,956 AT COMPLETION(LINE 31) 16 , 1 B 7 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 4315 Metro Pkwy, Suite 520 Fort Mvers, FL 33916 Phone (239) 332-1300 Fax (239) 332-1789 www.pirnie.com I MALCOLM PIRNIE INDEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS AND CONSULTANTS July 28, 2010 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Project Manager Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Forest lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F-53 PO #4500098562 Change Order No.2 Dear Mr. Richard: Malcolm Pirnie is pleased to provide the Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes (County) this requested scope of work for Additional Services for the above-referenced project. The purpose of this Change Order No.2 is to amend Malcolm Pirnie's scope of services and delivery schedule under PO 4500098562 to account for additional services needed to complete the project based on the anticipated construction schedule. SCOPE OF SERVICES The additional services requested for this project include the following tasks: TASK 050 - Proiect ManaRement This task includes the work effort required for project planning, administration, and coordination. Specific activities included in this task include the following: . Managing and coordinating project activities and field personnel to control costs and maintain the project schedule. . Maintaining project files and data systems . Preparing monthly invoices . Providing internal quality control . Internal and external project-related communications TASK 200 - Construction ManaRement and Inspection Services During the construction phase, Malcolm Pirnie will assist the County by providing the following services: . Provide full-time construction inspection during the course of the construction work for up to thirty-five (35) working days. For the purposes of this scope, full time is considered to be eight (8) hours per working day. i\\i\LC O~ \ 1 >IRNh:: 16 11 87 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Project No. F-53 Change Order No.2 July 28, 2010 Page 2 of 2 ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to performing the work identified in this scope, Malcolm Pirnie will perform Additional Services as requested by the County. The need for such services may arise from the completion of the tasks identified above and cannot be fully defined at this time. However, it may be determined at some future date that these additional services are necessary to thoroughly complete or implement the Work. Examples of Additional Services may include technical evaluations, preparation of reports, or other activities deemed necessary by the County. It should be noted that the fees for these services have not been included in this scope. Such tasks and their level of effort, associated budgets and schedules will be described in detail in work authorizations to be issued at the time such tasks are requested by the County. SCHEDULE Malcolm Pirnie anticipates providing the professional services outlined above for a period of up to ninety (90) calendar days beyond the current work order completion date of September 15, 2010, for an estimated completion date of December 14, 2010. COMPENSATION Malcolm Pirnie will provide this scope of services under the terms and conditions of Contract 05-3657 Agreement for Project Management and Oversight Services for a lump sum fee of $41,860. The project budget is based on the scope of work as provided and is subject to cost adjustment resulting from any change in the scope or schedule of work. Malcolm Pirnie appreciates this opportunity to provide this requested scope of services, and will enjoy working with the County on this important project. If you have any questions regarding this scope or need any additional information, please feel free to contact Christopher Tilman, P.E. or me at (239) 332- 1300. Sincerely, MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. ~+J. ~~ Robert H. French, P.E. Senior Associate A403748 16 J 1 87 QUALITY ENTERPRISES USA, INC. Forest lakes - lake 7E, 16E Rock Excavation Time as of 8/20/10 HOURLY RATE HOURS TOTAL Personnel Project Manager $90.00 $0.00 Superintendent $70.00 $0.00 Foreman $65.00 $0.00 Mechanic & Equipment Operator $60.00 $0.00 laborer $45.00 321 $14,445.00 Administrative $50.00 $0.00 EQuipment (with Operator) Excavator - 20 metric tons $115.00 130 $14,950.00 Excavator - 7.5 metric tons $85.00 60 $5,100.00 Backhoe $75.00 $0.00 Wheel loader - 2.5 cubic yard $85.00 $0.00 Wheel loader - 4 cubic yard $105.00 119 $12,495.00 Bull Dozer - 8 metric tons $95.00 $0.00 Dump Truck - tandem axle $75.00 $0.00 Dump Truck - tri- axle $80.00 $0.00 RolI-Off Container Truck $85.00 $0.00 lowboy Trailer $95.00 5 $475.00 Water Truck or Trailer $95.00 $0.00 Motor Grader $110.00 $0.00 Vibratory Roller $95.00 $0.00 Asphalt Roller $95.00 $0.00 Asphalt Paver $215.00 $0.00 T elehandler $95.00 $0.00 Tap Machine - small (3/4" - 3") each tap $350.00 $0.00 Tap Machine - large (4" - 12") each tap $750.00 $0.00 EQuipment (without Operator) Truck with Hand Tools $45.00 $0.00 Jobsite Trailer (rate per day) $120.00 $0.00 RolI-Off Container - 20 cubic yard $60.00 $0.00 Small EQuipment (without Operator) Air Compressor with Hammer $30.00 96 $2,880.00 Trench Box 16' x 10' (rate per day) $210.00 $0.00 Steel (Road) Plates (rate per day) $200.00 $0.00 3" Trash Pump $25.00 $0.00 2" Submersible Pump $25.00 $0.00 Concrete Saw (rate per ft.) $3.00 $0.00 Cut Of Saw (rate per day) $85.00 $0.00 Light Set (rate per day) $200.00 $0.00 Other MOT $750.00 $0.00 Total: $50,345.00 10 \ 1 B" " Select Year: 12009 .~ (GOl The 2009 Florida Statutes Title XXIII MOTOR VEHICLES Chanter 316 STATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL View Entire Chanter 316.189 Establishment of municipal and county speed zones..- (1) MUNICIPAL SPEED.-.The maximum speed within any municipality is 30 miles per hour. With respect to residence districts, a munidpality may set a maximum speed limit of 20 or 25 miles per hour on local streets and highways after an investigation determines that such a limit is reasonable. It shall not be necessary to conduct a separate investigation for each residence district. A munfcfpality may set speed zones altering the speed limit, both as to maximum, not to exceed 60 miles per hotM", and minimum, after investigation determines such a change is reasonable and in conformity to criteria promulgated by the Department of Transportation, except that no changes shall be made on state highways or connecting links or extensions thereof, which shall be changed only by the Department of Transportation. (2) SPEED ON COUNTY ROADS.--The maximum speed on any county-maintained road is: (a) In any business or residence district, 30 miles per hour in the daytime or nighttime; provided that with respect to residence districts a county may set a maximum speed limit of 25 miles per hour after an investigation determines that such a limit is reasonable; and it shall not be necessary to conduct a separate investigation in each residence district. (b) On any other part of a county road not a business or residence district, as set forth in s. 316.183. However, the board of county commissioners may set speed zones altering such speeds, both as to maximl.l1l and minimum, after investigation determines such a change is reasonable and in conformity to criteria promulgated by the Department of Transportation, except that no such speed zone shall permit a speed of more than 60 miles per hour. (3) POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS. --All speed zones shall be posted with dearly legible signs. No change in speeds from 30 miles per hour or from those established in s. 316.183 shall take effect ootil the zone is posted by the authority changing the speed pursuant to this section and s. 316.187. All signs which limit or establish speed limits, maximl.l1l and minimum, shall be so placed and so painted as to be plainly visible and legible in daylight or in darkness when illuminated by headlights. (4) PENALTY.--vtolation of the speed limits established under this section must be dted as a moving violation, pooishable as provided in chapter 318. http://www.1eg.state.f1.uslstatuteslindex.cfin? App _ mode=Display _ Statute&Search _ String=... 8/11/2010 161 'i X �- , .�_, FOREST LAKES BLVD_ icy,, - 1 } X CO ° O� .:�w .itt 0 Anlit irir ill _ rn CI i.i& At r iii. , k--- . -.-.- i ' _. -. ,,. . ic .. .,.. #. i .cilisig ,--", , -h , 1 w_r_w ... ,.:1 0 , . .,..,. ..... . ,....._4_11_ , ... • ., z . , .. .. ,.. 4 ..„. . '../— . ... �`•$ - f a k it m€ {,�� r C ,"fir l K° -4q ; 4 s �{`d �-, 1 CO ' 14Ittii; ' ,,,,,,aH.„,, pr,. {:,„,,_.: . k'''.7.--';,,,';'''' ;:-Z;'-' _,OYA:.w.‘..74,..4;::?,:?...: :'1,...__,. ;or:is.'li it..._.:::.„---... , �• .s r�:' a „ y T N . -. ai fi Cn r r �4y} P t i s 'F 6L V/ S s.ff G. 1. .. rs. . r1 ; _ ' t1� }gyp - J X 4. w.y s A-1" i .:1144�- ;. Z, 'cc — F t •�1 ! D w 91 TT11 /��r Y? � yJJ�-��, yet A. .8. b ':,, .:;;G FOREST LAKES BLVD--�-' ._; 'G, : _ ,. .K. ..._ 0 s e.Y f,— ' r p + C. 111-e.: trai'512,„1 * "-*-- i y •Avr,„ ti, a iTi � e� rs � Orli' lYlli1 f4 r tji. , ,,,,,,t„w,.:..t.,_=._„„tvi,,,,,,._ ....,1, _- _ , .., . . „....„--.10. .t. , .. -,-.-,..,-.:,. Al I 16 11 B 7 Forest Lakes MSTU - Proposed Project Estimate Est. Item Description Quantity Units Unit Price Total Price Mobilization 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $1,875.00 $1,875.00 12" Sch 40 or A2000 PVC Drainage 300 LF Pipe $25.00 $7,500.00 Underdrain 1800 LF $16.25 $29,250.00 Catch Basins 3 LS $1,375.00 $4,125.00 Grading & Sodding 1600 SY $9.38 $15,008.00 Disposal of Materials 200 CY $3.13 $626.00 Roadway Boring 7 EA $2,187.50 $15,312.50 Irrigation Removal/Relocation 50 LF $12.50 $625.00 Total $79,321.50 . . . 7 Aug. 24. 2010 12:55PM Qu ail Run luascnlll raX:lj~-~bl-l~~J lIUII 'No. 4647';);)ap. 2JL ~ Aquagenlx Mahallinll Your llQ~ld A....I. Angt.tst :24, 2010 Quail Run Golf Oub 1 Forest lakes ENd Naples, H 34105 Mr. BagdoIJ... Thank you for talking with George tmd I today 1n regards to the l.akts located at Quail Run. just to xecap our dt.scu.ssi.on: We. are tmmltly tteadng a. highly invasm weed known as hydrilla on your property_ TM hydrllla. has bttR tmlted with Sonar. The hydrilla ig now dead an,d decomposing. Unfoxtunardy during this process the plant mlt~ commonlyfloau to tbe smf2tt and crea.tes an unsightly appearance. The planrs decomposit:ion ~ causes a nlttrlent upload in the lake CI!atiDg an ideal condition far algae to grow. We are CU11'ently contracted b) tree.t the lakes at Quail R1tn once per month. We higbly~ waldy visits at this tImt: until the. hydrillA has dlx:omposc:d. On these vm~ we would spray a contact hmjdde and an algaecide. The corn}linllrion of these will accelerate the decomposit1on process and help c:onttol the. algae. We. propose to treat each week fox w next month for an addkioIal $100.00. 'this wonId be done ~ a onmroe work order and would ~ charged in addition to your I1011Wd monthly conaact pIice. We also KCOIDIIlUld that the contract be amended to have: me. "Yisit schedule changed to twice per month at Qua.fi Run. This wD1 allOWllS to keep a closer eye on the lakes and start tn:atfng any invasive veget:arlon and algae before it am get out of control The contract price would change from. $448.90 ro $700.00 per month. Thank you - Bobby Van Smn Branch Mamgtt Sales Manager Aquagenix 6260 Metro Planbwon Road, Fort Myers, FL 33966 (~9) 681-1420 .. Fax; (239) 1)61-2863 All_Ix IS a "'-lIIY 01 DeM,)lIg SfOItoftt, lno. It I I i.• O fD CO V T C, A W N - O (O 0 V co (NT A W N - 0 ID O V 01 o A W O t 147 mm Zcc x D � _i � D r z r- -4 0 z po D 7J m z ZO po c O p707 -0 mm = mv0 - KcOmD7Jmm �l -i ncn > oo D mDm = 2OZnJcmn = m730 -1 > 0OJOJDD < mr � TDx J r mm Z00 ZZ qmA -1 mm > _i _lCZxg -Im3la7 < n D Ztm xZZ mxn > = D O Z Z 33 70 n > -< T o -ICJ m 1- Z 0 m 7J m m C W K < =• m m O Mm O n AAX rN mX O1-OWmMXZCO - ° M - 5UO � 4 HZ G) O c», D .4 < 37 u m 22 D Z C -c -A O � m m > > m TD -I 0 0 m A OZZ -' r- 5 --I kD ZO -< m -A C) Z RO73 DDX X73 X 77 0"j AZ -I u Z0 ) C Dmn -0 � 0 -C1 - DHZm n Zm C mCD00 C OZK 074 -I > Z -‹ - DMZ 0Zm 0XOC yO V mK O O m CI OM O z O D D W m x O Dm m � z X x m z m x m m m Z m n y m O r X 0 m D W O m m Z m o r O � EA EA EA EA 69 EA EAIEA EA fn EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA Efl A A -• W AA A y O A A N O N - 10.4) A N N W 3 s1 N (T N) N 000 CO _ _ 0 0) .-44, -, MOD CO G) OC t0 0 O CO cn W W W 100 (0 O) A N -A O0N N W N -A C) A V O -k Na N 000 GI N V �I NON (0 NOO OOOONN O N NCO C7t O) O O (n (n(C 0. N 00 000 00 NON O 000 000000 O N NO NO O O 00 ,0 0 N 00 000 00 NON O . 000 . . . 000000 . O N NO NO . . O . O 00 O, C 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O CA O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O -O. 0 - 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O » CD -A O O O O O EA EA EA EA EA 69 EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA to EA to Er)-CO EA En to to En EA En EA EA En EA 69 64 EA EA EA EA En Efl 0 -+ 0 N (...) 0) 3 w co CCOO A N co cn 3 N -co wW 0O -, N 0 A 0 3 O V J N W O O N O CD CO O ONO O O • A • O 0 EA Efl EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA to EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA m X O O ■S N N CD 4, W W W V �I Of O NOD0 O O . . D n W - .Q. O N01 -4 V v 1001 (OC) -JA (ON O 00 00.-. ON6COwC co N N W O O A A COO A A cn N N CO O O O O N m N A CO C d O OA Na O 0 O O W W CO 0 V 0C) OD CD O W W 0 -A Cn -A W N 10A4, OO O C) 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 O ON O O O C D -I 6) .--4 CO s CO CT O O O O -I C 0 O ONO -A A O O (0 (0 CD -A W (O CD y EA EA EA EA EA EA EA to EA EA to to to EA EA 69 to EA 60 EA EA to to to En to to EA EA En to EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA to I> N -a -, A A p S1 Lt m N 0 CD CD N W A -, C) 0 C - Q -k0 .014 � W O W N A N�Cn � -, -, A N(T CT N N -, 0 A (0 N N --4 � V O0) OCnA NO (7) W (nA W OO (DQONAOO NNO W N (0Nd1 -CO 0NON N 00 A -I O) A OA W N O) W OO -, NN N O W 0 0 0 N N O N O O N O) N 4, -A 00 4i CD V A OA ? W CO N OOO V OW C3 O O O (0 N O N O W O -, Cn -, O) CO OO 0 in N ' ' A O A W N -, O O O -A O N O J O O O N O O in O 0 CO sI O) v CO N O;O (0 A N 000 G1vV N O O O N) O v O CO OOOVV 0- 0 ,(0 O -. G) 0A * * -1Wcn (nWWXXXXI0OZZKgKKKKKKggggKK EvI) vv') ammvoOOm07c>x��' O C 0 0 0 3 c c w w m m w w w m w w w w w w w w (O▪ 7 7 7 7 C ID < G w w a a 7 O O O () () O O (� n O O O O �< 41• CO 7 7 C -•(p 3 3 O C C C C 3' am- 0- O0- mmm DDDD _= - 0 d 000 0000000000Hosmmco o mm333m' , Om (o (om < umwm35' > > 307777 `< X 0 33333333333330W (� mwR O -D ( mm > Uy7700C 3 3 3 -0 (D 0 0 o o m 0 0 3 m 7 n �, n 6 O Oc - -n cncncn » DCncncno°, 77wtv - = = � v � RvvRR � RvO00mmO - * s.. 0_1' - a0 xxx0 O c c c c m n (o m m 3 m o0 .G > > > > 3 > > 3 3 7 7 7 3 7 7 m w v O 20. 0. 0. 0 rn m y o 0 N Z. 0 -o Z Z N' 1D' a' CD CD N' CD' a' CU 5 N' 5 (D (D ua) va) 7 c (p 7 m nr) a z C m n 0 0 0 C� () o fD fD O n o 7 7 7 > 0) CO 7 01 W CD 7 N' 0 * ? m CO m in s P w c C -I 3 .- m C// 0 N C3 v) W 00' '0 '3 CD 0 -.Ti-° m O 3 .0.. z r (O 01 (0 (0 CD CO CD 1,30 > _3 3 rn N m• 7 o (00 _ O A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A (n (in CJ) (n (n 010) 010) 01010) 0) 0101 (n CT T (n (r T Cn (n (n T Cn (r T T (T CT T C)) (n Cn T (710) 0) 01 (71 01010) 0) -A < o o - o < - - - - m C '� N to (D () (n - OaD W O O0C) C) O W OOO m m ...• m O -a -A -A 0 -- O -a -A -a0 N CI .J CO w 0) W co CO 0 N -. OO V W D NN ANN A 01 O_ CO O CO N CO CO CO N -I CO A CO 0 � O) v CO -, CO g,, v 0 60 A_ 0)- v v W W Co Con CAO A N J v CNO Co N - 4, 0 0 A A (D W W CO N CO C N 00 (0D W CO COT CO CO C0)) N -A OD CCO ON) (0n C0n O) - N A CO CO -1 CO A (O co A O) cn N O co w -, -, 0 A W V N v 0 Co Co CD Cn W V CT CO CT 01 G) -1 O cn A OW01- > 07KKTJrrrrO ;nDr <n -0 v -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -00W0 * * 5- 0X7 -OKmDgv00) 00 MaCM0n3) 30007 7 77 C. O. 0-00 gKKKKK3KKgggg � ° 0 ? ? O Ovmow3w = ma * m0 0 f ay CT 5' -. _. y a s as = 3 m m- ( 000000000OOOOm m ccu m m' v, - 0 , ' w Q6 (n (n (n cm < G G < G G G G G < G G O m o (D 7 w (O , 0 - m cn w _ dvcDi7 � 000ric c cc ply n °7 mOm mmOmmmmmmmm °) oa�� n uD nvm ^ Q° 3 C0Cx 0ro100 °- 0 ,- � 0m C mm I- 0Wmm �.�.�.C.�.c.�.Z.Z.Z.0.0.0. w v -I � m g 0 a0Km0a35. 33 -o 7'(O DCrO 5 CO "<,`G w 3 a cn 333 3333333333 cn cn -' f0 (0 7 w -- CD 0) 0 co o '"' 0 0 co- N =-00 0 - N 0 0 O N_•(0 (0 (O (0 CCDD 0 p ((DD cn ) cn Cn w Cn Cn cn Cn (n Cn cn cn Z 2 W °: °: (T. K 5- - N v C) m m m m m 0 (o < mm � 3am 70072' Z ? z 2z ? Z2 ? ? 7 ? ? 778. 77 °c 06. 07) C. sxsp30 o 3 _ cn3 ac O 0 m m o 0 -• = i7 g y N -, m^ mTITmmT1mN (n 0.-..-. 7 (0 0 oga as to 0 -03a3, r r < K(p' W 6 N k Cn (71 (T N Cn C) -. = -.. 0 N f N N N ? 0 0 m m tv m w c cn N N V CO w 0 co 7 < a co 7 7 W 7 O' A n � 0 �c (0 (0 (0 CD CD N 0 O (010)(0 27 7 o m d • ChCOO°O 0 -, 0 0 2n 2n 0 < - --II 000000 -1OOOO O 000 O -A 0 .M. Oo W v CD 01 (T -4 -4 O (,n 0 (n U) (T (n0101 0101010OCD CO (DCO CO 000 " 5 (WD CT N 0 A Z Z U) (f) W G) C) Cn Z Z Z (r) (- O O CO Cn) Ca CO C�1 COO ()O Ca) CO N .n+ (n Z Z Z Z 01 Cn CT Z (T Z Z Z 01 (n n O X000) -C, > m Coco ADD D � (O (101 OOCTC W CT0 ) CAmw0O D D DDCNND ODDDwN N O) 6) O CA) N A A A A A -J 3 -I -.I Cn U) N CT CT Cn �I 01 Cn 01 N �� O W W A CO N (C & 0 0 W V W A A A Y 0) Q V V r V ■I v p V V V O CO CO CO 01 W cn + O O CD OO 00 O O N O O ? 0 N A 4t EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 60 EA EA EA EA EA En EA to 69 EA EA EA EA EA EA 60 EA to to to to to to EA EA EA EA EA to to to to to to to to to EA EA EA 64 0 W ONN -A A -A O A NON A -+ -+ A - 0) 0 (71 w O A 01 IV OD 0 O W A A W -C N O A O)A A IV G)N G) Co Cn (n -, ), N 0 (ON O 0) CD V (O (O O N O CO CD -A COA00 -A COO 0) - 3 O CO 001 O NO N -s V O O Cn NO W AOONN O O CO i (0 �„' N N (n A O 4 in co -C O 0 CO O O O O CO Co (n 0 0 Co O 0 O s -, 0 N O cn O A -, N O Co O O O O O O CO 0 0 0 0 0 O EA EA EA EA EA EA to EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA to EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA to EA to to to to EA EA > '" W o N▪ A W _ N N CO -A N C) W N A -1 N Na W CO _ * A CO W CO N N O N A NJ -A (D CO V 000 -IACO -A ONN � CO -A NNCn C) Ny --k-OD-01-0)--, N) -010 14--4 is..)--•0 C CT (T O O O) O N A V A W (O - -+ V (n A v N CD A 00 D) N CON 01 la hi A A V -, N A N A CO N -I N A N O -4 O) O O O O v 0 -A CO O OD -A CT 0 CO -, CA (n O Q) N Co O V -A (O N O O 0 W CT CO -4 O N W O O 0 A OD CO O) v v CO cn O O O C) -A 0 (O N O N NJ -A N N -I 0 O O 01 W CD (n cr. O V 0 0 O _w O O N N N N in ' 0 0 ' N - N W Co -A Co O O O O O O N O O O O O O N N A O in O O 0 O N O O) O O in O O O a V V -+ O C00 C 00 O O) -A CO (n N CO N V 000 CD C) O O0 O O O CD C. N O 000 O 0 C 000 0000 O RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2010 16 I 1 ~la~ Halas Henning Coyle Coletta Goard of County Commissioners GO co 2885 Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes - August 10, 2010 V. Transportation Operations Report A. Budget B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard VI. Transportation Maintenance Report - Hannula VII. Landscape Architects Report - JRL VIII. Landscape Architects Report - McGee & Associates A. Hunter & Coronado IX. Old Business A. Member Terms B. Water Symposium X. New Business XI. Public Comments XII. Adjournment = Misc. Corres: <6 :: ~")ies to 16 I 1 B 8 vi GOl RY 2885 Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 MINUTES I. Call to order The meeting was called to order at 4:04 p.m. by Richard Sims, Chairman. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Peggy Harris, Barbara Segura, Richard Sims, Pat Spencer, Michael McElroy (Absent) County: Darryl Richard - MSTU Project Manager, Michelle Arnold - A TM Director Others: Michael McGee - McGee & Associates, James Stephens - Hannula, Richard Tindell- JRL Design, Sue Flynn - Juristaff, Mary Helrigle - Public III. Approval of Agenda Add: X A. Member Terms Richard Sims moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by Peggy Harris. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. IV. Approval of Minutes - July 12, 2010 and May 11, 2010 Richard Sims moved to approve the July 12,2010 as submitted. Second by Pat Spencer. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. Pat Spencer moved to approve the May 11,2010 as amended. Second by Peggy Harris. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. V. Transportation Operations Report A. Budget 16 , 1 BI8 Darryl Richard read a response received from Mark Isaacson, Finance Department regarding the Golden Gate MSTU Beautification Carry Forward Account Fund 153 balance. '" Anticipated Carry Forward FY 2009 for year ending 9/30/09- $1,266,600. '" Audited Carry Forward FY 2009 - $1,588,600. '" Anticipated Carry Forward FY 2010 - $1,550,500. '" Audited Carry Forward FY2010 will not be available until February 2011. Barbara Segura arrived 4: J 0 pm The Staff distributed and reviewed the Golden Gate Beautification MSTU Fund 153 Report dated August 10,2010. (See attached) · Current Ad Valorem Tax - short $26,158.15 · Revenue Structure - short $19,542.56 · Operating Expense Available - $51,144.29 · Capital Outlay Available - $1,354,320.00 · Total Budget Amended -$1,745,178.50 Total Budget Available - $1,411,584.74 Southern Signal contract will expire in January. It was noted the Taxable Value FY 2010 is $819,342,802 was lower than Taxable Value FY 2009. The current millage rate is 0.5000 which when calculated equals the Current Ad Valorem Tax Amended Budget of $409,700,000. B. Project Manager Report Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed the Golden Gate MSTU Project Status Report dated August 10,2010. (See attached) o (G-32) Water Symposium Collaboration - Median #21 Concept drawings are pending from Water Symposium. o (G-31) Hunter & Coronado Design - Curbing, Landscape and Irrigation Final Design has been completed and has been circulated for staff review. The ROW Permit is pending. o (G-25) Golden Gate Master Plan - Revision The final submittal is under review by Staff. o (G-26) Maintenance Contract Hannula's contract is scheduled to expire in December 2012. o (G-29) Maintenance Consulting Contract JRL Design is under contract. o MSTU going "paperless" The Staff provided equipment specifications and associated costs on: (See attached) . A VerMedia A VerVision 300AF + Document Camera, $641.95 . Epson EX31 LCD Multimedia Projector, $499.99 . Apollo Ventura 4000 Ultra-Portable Overhead Projector,$468.99 2 16 , 1 B 8 Discussion was made regarding the equipment, cost, the amount of usage by MSTU and other committees. The Committee decided to ask the Golden Gate Community Center (GGCC) if they would be interested in sharing costs. Peggy Harris volunteered to introduce concept to the GGCC at the next meeting scheduled on August 30. VI. Transportation Maintenance Report - Hannula James Stephens reported rainy weather hindered regular maintenance. Extra crews have been scheduled to complete maintenance by the end of the week. Herbicides applications will be made early during the morning. VII. Landscape Architects Report - JRL Richard Tindell distributed and reviewed the Landscape Architect's Field Report. (See attached) He suggested the following: · Trim plants to meet State mandated heights. · Utilize chemicals on the paver areas and manual solutions to control weeds along Collier, Golden Gate and Tropicana. · Replacement of an oak tree just north of Golden Gate on SR 951. It has extensive bark damage and is leaning in median needs to be replaced. · Rotor location Golden Gate Median (See attached) JRL reviewed overspray of irrigation water in median on to electrical equipment and recommended changing the head type and location near the electrical equipment. · Overall site is looking good. VIII. Landscape Architects Report - McGee & Associates A. Hunter & Coronado It was noted the Coronado Parkway and Hunter Boulevard Median, Curbing and Landscape Project Public Meeting was held on August 9,2010. Mike McGee and David Julien, representatives from McGee & Associates, Norman Trebilcock, representative of Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, Staff and Golden Gate MSTU Committee Members were present to answer questions from the public. McGee & Associates, Staff and Committee Members presented the Final Design, answered questions from the public and received positive feedback. He asked the Committee to give Staff direction to proceed. Richard Sims expressed concerns on the maintenance cost of the canape trees. He stated the MSTU intends to turn off the water and plants that required irrigation not be installed. Richard Sims moved to approve the (100% Design) plans (submitted by McGee & Associates.) Second by Pat Spencer. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. 3 16 I 1 Ba IX. Old Business A. Water Symposium - None. X. New Business A. Member Terms Richard Sims and Barbara Segura Advisory Board Membership is scheduled to expire on October 6, 2010. Barbara Segura stated she had an upcoming project that could pose a problem with her attendance. The Committee formed a consensus that it would not be an issue. Discussion was made on changing the number of meetings per year. The committee decided to continue meetings every month until further notice. XI. Public Comments Mary Helrigle stated she moved down to Golden Gate in 1980. She stated many improvements have been made and commended the Committee for making the Community very attractive. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned at 5:05 P.M. Golden Gate MSTU Advisory Committee These minutes approved by the Committee/Board on q / / 4- / I () as presented K- or amended The next meeting is scheduled for September 14, 2010 4:00 PM at Golden Gate Community Center - Naples, FL 4 August 10,2010 16 , 1 tNS Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Golden Gate MSTU Project Status (G-32): ACTIVE - Water Symposium Collaboration - Median #21 05-11-10: Committee reviewed initial proposal for project and selected site in median #21 on Golden Gate Pkwy. 07-11-10: Staff reports that time frame for project is "2 years" for installation to remain installed. 08-10-10: Concept Drawings are pending from Water Symposium. (G-31): ACTIVE - Hunter & Coronado Design; Curbing, Landscape, and Irrigation Project Name: (2009-003P) Golden Gate Beautification MSTU - Landscape, Irrigation, Curbing Final Design. (Coronado Parkway & Hunter Blvd.) 7-11-10: 100% plans are being circulated for staff review for ROW Permit. Public Meeting needs to be scheduled for public review. 08-09-10: Public Meeting held 08-10-10: ROW Permit issue is pending. (G-25) ACTIVE - Golden Gate Master Plan - revision; (PO 4500100242; Work Order: TLO-MA-3614-07-04; Original Contract Time-Line: NTP 12/8/2006 to Final Completion 12/30/2007; Original PO Amount: $4,800) 05-11-10: Final Submittal under review by staff. (G-26) ONGOING- Maintenance Contract 08-10-10: Hannula Landscape is under contract. (G-29) ONGOING- Maintenance Consulting Contract 08-10-10: JRL Design is under contract. 1 . A VerM~dia A VerVision 300AF document camera by Office Dt6 I 1 8 a. Page 1 of2 Office DBPO~ . r.lMfC-I{~ Not Yet Rated Write the First Review DESCRIPTION A VerMedia A VerVision 300AF+ - document camera Item # 165095 t.l Delivery only Your Price $641.95 I each The convergence of the latest visual technologies in the classroom is an undeniable value to new evolution of teaching. However, these technologies can at times prove difficult to use, and may be slow and overly complex. Combining the latest in visual technologies, with unbeatable ~f-use, the AVerVision300AF+ was designed. The ability to display documents, 3-D objects, microscopic images and more through virtually any multimedia projector, monitor or TV greatly enhances the visual learning today's students best respond to. Yet, the ability to quickly and easily move through demonstration subject matter is essential to maintaining attention and inaeasing information retention. Beginning with an incomparably clear 3.2 mega pixel camera sensor, video is sharp and precise. The fast auto focus capabilities allow teachers to instantly foals on text, pictures or objects without time consuming focal adjustments, even when using the digital or AVERZOOM features. The 24-fps frame rate projects video of moving objects significantly reducing blur or distortion. Annotation features allow teachers to easily add notes, aeate drawings, highlight important details, or even erase aspects of the live projected images directly from a PC or MAC. With the additional audio recording feature included in the new AVerVision software, teachers can now record video with narration of a live dissection or sculpting a clay pol The mechanical arm design provides increased stability and ealHHlf-use with the ab~ity to fold down into a compact configuration for easy transport and storage. The combination of high quality video and incredible ~f-use makes the AVerVlSion300AF+ a true teacher's presentation tool. PRODUCT DETAILS Item , Manufacturer , manufacturer Image tKhnology wIdIh depth height weight cam.... type digital zoom atllllmage digital camera use Image sensor type .....lrIa focus adjustment video computer Interface data Input method 165095 56643272 Avermedia document camera 8.6 in 5.5 in 19.7 in 4.41bs color - day&night 8 1024 x 768 - up to 24 frames per second manual white balance, manual exposure, digital image freeze, auto exposure control, auto white balance, detachable camera module, image mirror anos 112" f/3.0 automatic, manual s-video, composite video, vga, dvi usb 1 x display I video - vga output - 15 pin hd d-sub (hd-15) · 1 x display I video - vga input - 15 pin hd d-sub (hd-15) · 1 x usb - 4 pin usb type b . 1 x display I video - rs-232c1s-video output - 4 pin mini-din · 1 x display I video - composite video out http://www.officedepot.com/a/products/165095/A VerMedia-A VerVision-300AF-document-... 8/9/2010 16 liB 81 Page 1 of2 Epson EX31 LCD Multimedia Projector by Office Depot 'OfficeDEPO~ . 7i11MJ~1f1/Mtitttm -- t '- ,~. . ._~ -- -;..-~-;:;--w- 4outof5 Read Reviews (1) I Review This Product DESCRIPTION Epson@ EX31 LCD Multimedia Projector Item # 125019 Native 800 x 600 (SVGA) resolution delivers crisp, easy-fa-view images Innovative 3lCD technology minimizes distractions and maximizes your color. 25QO..1umen brightness provides a bright, colorful picture in darK or sunlit rooms. Native 4:3 aspect ratio is ideal for important business presentations. Learn More ~ Delivery only $549.99 -$50.00 $499.99 $499.99 Original Price: Instant Savings: Checkout Price: Your Price after instant savings Prices effective through 08121/2010. . Innovative 3LCD technology minimizes distractions and maximizes your color. . 2500-Iumen brightness provides a bright, colorful picture In dark or sunlit rooms. . Native 4:3 aspect ratio Is Ideal for Important business presentations. . Portable projector Is great for business trips or moving between offices. Weighs just over 5 Ibs and indudes a carrying case and remote control. . Convenient, Intuitive controls Include Instant Off/On, Sleep Mode (AV Mute), Auto Image alignment and more. . Durable lamp lasts up to 5,000 hours. PRODUCT DETAILS Item , Manufacturer t# brand name manufacturer model name Imag. technology maximum brightness natlv. resolution maximum resolution aspect ratio color depth contrast ratio Image cIIstortlon control (keystone correction) maximum diagonal Image size maximum projection distance projector weight lamp type average lamp life HD compatible number of RGB Inputs number of s-vtdeo Inputs automatic focus remote controllnclueled cas. Indueled height 125019 V11 H309020 Epson Epson EX31 LCD 2500 lumens 800 x 600 1400 x 1050 4:3 24-bit 2000:1 yes 350 inches 46.4 feet 5.11b (E-TORL) Epson Twin Optimized Reflection Lamp 5000 hours yes 1 1 no yes yes 3.1 inches http://www.officedepot.comlalproducts/1250 19/Epson-EX31-LCD-Multimedia-Projector/ 8/9/2010 Apollo Ventura 4000 Ultra Portable Overhead Projector b!cGe . Office DEPO~ . 7tt11Mfe-~/lMdtftm Not Yet Rated Write the First Review DESCRIPTION Apollo Ventura 4000 Ultra-Portable Overhead Projector Item # 753571 Weighs just 8 Ibs and folds down for quick setup and take-down. 2,000+ lumens of bright light, ideal for projecting most transparencies. Triple-element lens system provides sharper focus and picture darity. Oversized 11 1/4" x 11 1/4" projection size accommodates full-size transparencies. Leam More ~ Delivery only Your Price $468.99 I each . 2,000+ lumens of bright light. Ideal for projecting most transparencies. . TrlpkMtlement lens system provides sharper focus and picture clarity. . Oversized 11114- x 11114- projection size accommodates full.1ze transparencies. . LamfMlhange lever positions a fresh lamp in operation Instantly. . Includes a hard stage cover with handle for protection In transit. . Backed by the manufacturer's limited lifetime warranty. PRODUCT DETAILS Item . Manufacturer . brand name manufacturer model name stage size maximum brightness head type lens type lamp type average lamp life lamp changer switch u~ulet fan folding post built-In handles warranty length cord length postconsumer recycled content total recycled content BETTER TOGETHER 753571 4000 Apollo ACCO Ventura 4000 11114" x 11114. 2,000 lumens open triplet EYB 75 hours yes yes yes yes 2-year limited 15 feet 0% 0% + ~7 = Buy both for: $493.08 Page 1 of2 http://www.officedepot.com/alproductsI753571/ Apollo- V entura-4000-Ultra-Portab1e-Overh... 8/9/2010 . ~ 1611Baf ~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 5th AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES. FLORIDA 239-261-4007 O@[fi1@]@@@[F)@ @[f@[Juo~@@~5J@ lfo@O@] [f@[F)@~ COPY TO : ~ OWNER D ARCHITECT D ENGINEER D CONSULTANT ~ _MSTU Committee_ PROJECT: Golden Gate MSTU . PO# 4500118406 CONTRACTOR: Hannula Landscaping - Jim Stephens REPORT NUMBER: JRL COMM No: 6.1 9018 Date: 7/12, 7/26,8/4 Weather: Cloudy & Humid Estimate % Complete: N/A Time: 11 :30 - 1 :30 Temp Range: 95 Schedule Conformance: As scheduled PRESENT: July 12: Jim Stephens & Richard Tindell July 26 & August 4: Richard Tindell, landscape architect WORK IN PROGRESS: Contractor present OBSERVATIONS: Site is looking good, Little trash observed. Routine maintenance work has been performed. Grass only medians seem neglected. REVIEWS: Maintenance agreement, previous suggestions, designs and work orders. Report from Darryl Richard 7128 (repeating 7/12 report) REPORT: Reviewed last report and status of work orders and direction from County with Jim. Reviewed overspray of irrigation water in median on to electrical equipment. The system currently uses rotor heads along the curb shooting across the median from both sides. The advantage of this approach is a low precipitation rate low volume design which uses less heads. One solution to the watering of the equipment is to change the head type and location near the electrical equipment. Hunter Irrigation has designed a new ultra low volume spider type head (rotors with a radius of 12' to 3D' and matching spray and specialty heads) that might resolve the problem. Replacement could be limited to equipment locations and shouldn't require any change to the current zone and valve design. There are several places in many of the medians along Collier. Golden Gate and Tropicana were weeds continue to be a problem and need to be addressed now. Chemical (especially in paver areas) and manual solutions (especially under trees) will work in most instances. (Repeating from last report as un-resolved) The beach sunflower on . .. 16 J 1 88 ~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 5th AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES. FLORIDA 239-261-4007 Collier is very weedy and difficult to keep looking nice and full- replacing it with Emerald Isle ficus or lIex nana would help correct both problems. The Crown-of-thorn beds on Tropicana should be hand weeded and additional mulch applied, the same is true for some of the liriope beds on Golden Gate. The allamanda in the median on Green needs filling in. After weeds are controlled under the sable and crape myrtle plantings on Golden Gate the open areas would benefit from ground cover plantings such as macho fern, Emerald Isle ficus or confederate jasmine. Proposal from Contractor as a contracted replacement is requested. Dead palmetto, ilex and juniper were observed on Collier and should be replaced. All planting areas continue to need to be trimmed to meet County and FOOT standards, especially within site triangles. Bougainvilla sprouts and low hanging tree branches require immediate attention. The required clear view zone is between 24" and 72", FOOT also requires 14'6" clear over traffic areas and 10' clear over sidewalks. Mowing seems behind schedule in the turf only medians, the recent heavy rain and hot weather promotes faster growth and delays - will monitor. Vehicle damaged oak in the median on Collier just north of Golden Gate is leaning, extensive bark damage observed and should be scheduled for replacement. ACTION REQUIRED: Review with county setback requirements for mountable curb as along Golden Gate. Meet with landscape contractor. Review schedules and contractors reports. Review outstanding work orders, designs and proposals previously requested or issued to Hannula. Request more direction from County and MSTU Board. Reported by: Richard Tindell, asia, registered landscape architect LA767 , •.„;„ .. ,.. ..,. ..,,,,, 4. B ,8 _ .._.44 .4, ... „,,,,,7- , , _....,,,,‘„,_ _.._ \_ . ....1....... ;...:::::.:..i , �. 1� . max_V ,,r+i1'. �•t ,Y '' it. •"... 7 1\'.4'.z.. lYt S 1 �:- �,`, J , S ,''v, w 1,- .L • •v .n //ice 't 4�" 7'i.. 'a } ter` j• ._ Caryl` J {2 k. ',t. 1 = a �^--.' Y t� ~,A ' � ' � �- -3 1../1( ' rte _ S rte . 'w 'M;. + m, 4 ,�� i /n ` i, s ' _ ` 1!/,. 1. �/I ; .,.,`�,.r I +, CQ ly��rf�l � la . W f \' Yom+/ ° X •• a �� Q m /'t.) i I ■1{ 10 y ►� • a) ,,, , . , \, ..,„ .n.,8 ,,,..,„:..,),fil .4, ,:. , i A 0 04. ,6,111 i' �� ` Its V CIZT \, !I l'‘,, i%ei,' ,%'/, O '5 CO •� '�` i — rt� ppit•° ' —. , . ..::.••!,,,,4_;.•4.44 . ' '''' -41•. 4.1t.,;0Y- — ,,4• ..,-'..',k•-..•■■ J....4..)Srigo. —... • \ y .yf - ]P. j° ,...,-0,- . ' .}r'l 1r'o-:;;;,,,,,.`,'.,v ' �� - •r ate - .i.... (� �`' / \.. ��1.�� *y r'd� A% • ` './. 1 tit f i61188 . 8 8 °n) N ca O (S8S88 S8SS8Sr." 888Pr CL N .— to W5 V-U) 00 N Ti C�') N�'N� ,1 Ti a n Q E 4, 434349 H 4443434 v� u, 4, ae94u3 of psi v3 u343 to 1 0 N O 0 M L: i-- LOO O n N V M O 0 CO V M N 0 M O a+ 01 O) LO 0 In CO N N N I n N CO N E .= (fl n V WOO V- - n (fl Vt CO N p I� CC r n U') V a V r r CO r V v, S 123 f0 CV Li. M 43 49 69 49 49 43 69 43 69 43 69 43 43 43 69 4A 43 ft3 69 43 43 43 fH 43 43 w R 1 m m m N pp t(p� p� L(�A�- ii �n m - > N 0 Z N to A In 1(7 ii 1 C7 A 11 to i M E l ; F. ,i b m d LL LL O c 88 0 -J I N r r r .c ci d) T § -,(° i c� 8 X C E C •O a t 7 7 .E 0c Z 0 .0 L 0 L C 0 m __ 5111 " E2 xeckEP088. 84118. 8. a. zom L S + W C V) / m §O o e S N ` b 'O t 7 O i 'O O 'O w N a c4��p L�i $ m U O a a 0 oo m m 0> oo g J J J LL f W m o x m co . W J a ? U J J (n U L I- J J I-- A stw tmt �03 mWLL � 1. oRg § og UV Z va 0 00§ . . 1 . § o § . § 1 . , 11 § § . 1 , § § • 0 Li L EN CO n CO n M E m e c ,- ,- z U z w, A c 0 o p rx c m °1 c z m m pl d o - rn rn o o 8 u c c o a Q Q ¢ O � u� yJ t T U 8 E 000 ,82 = E c 0 — — c yyyN AyyyN 222 .v o tt o No �p e > - U O O O J C C C 7 pJ C C.7 C7 C7 C C j wz �p p� �Qp U li u. Li. LLO. LOL tap.. = 2 2 pC -)i Y m 2 m 2 a. u) Up) cO p — a�p �tO�iOtOCn�iiCi 8-8-8 S-8—SoS 8888— N SO c284 SS �OA o a - 2O v� M U S (0OP. C 84 8sRSR S 0 0 0 OtoE N OI R M R2 M ODa00-4 ▪ ON CO o CDcORCN a CO r - MCAOC6Nr UvMr A3 NN O) M v. Q ...My CV r �A� 43434969 43 43 43 43 69 69 43 43 W 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 4) 4343 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 FA K 49 W 69 43 4349 W 43 W N IS Ln COn0 IS 888 888C.O 19 8 28 MNISONC0a m . 0 .4. 0 rn d CV O 1. N fM C•f O Cr) O! ' r Q ... (V Lt) to .- .N--_ lV h C'7 N N- N N n N v � r N _ x W 69434343 4343 43 69 43434343 w 43 4)43 43 !969 43 4369434343434343434943 W 43 H F9 H 43 43 w 4943 N 0 NO N (1) 10 0O w Ns- M r N N 0 I I I I I I i I I I I I , , N COO . 0 V c) r 0 n n N n v r .t N- (0 (0 0) I E O 0 43 434943 4943 6943434343434 :H E96943694369 4943434343434343434343 4s 4H4► 6969 434343 fR 434 8 , 88 , 8 , 8S8.28R88888888888888888.°.888888888_°. � � 8 _ g g C�0 (O (0 Fdg g g gg § § § § , ° 1. g ° co co , E m --v N R 00 fCl 1A ft) R R N r �' O '- m �p N ('7 O fh M 6A r N r r r r 434349434343 696969434943 H 43 494) 434349434369694343694969494343 N 43W 434 694343 4369 N x ceF- Ow eexozw m ¢ J Q JUp p a a J 0 ¢ w a (� O 2 I- 1- zx -ID ¢ F- wLL z U w . cn ce2 x < Era ow 02w Z a0 z M2 w.. OU 21010 > O W w � � oUj ZN W wxH � m2 W o } 2 < N-- a O ww V2 ° D oo ¢ ¢ wom u- wU ¢ zw < ! - -IwI cn D wwz v xO — � � froDz Uf lF_ m _ - } 2Zp � hJ = ¢ X F- g ZZO x W OopZ - Lt � � � U W ZQO W z ( w W ¢ ZwwUUc W W ~ a- CA ¢ ¢ U O g ¢ ¢ Xw X � UcEUU ° O - - UX a2 ¢ a > u) CL 2 = X XX X LL W C > > = 2 � W ww � LLW W wwI- < o W UZQ W < 00 a CL w0 OW I•- I- W ww Q01-- F- 115 L1- wwoo� ¢ HwwWW ZZxxt Z Q - wowl-- U ? Z J0 = Zw <QUJIwL n ~ ZZ OOz ww < DwL ►- Lii wx < < wW O ZZp � I=- O _, n1. n2C7mUwMw = a � ¢ xx Dom W W 0 OOL X F- L- UUZI- F west- 00_ 02gJaJJOL1OO 0I- F- ( (01- XX I- N c) ,t h 40 n c0 0) O e- N M V h 40 P■ O O) O r N M et M 40 N O 0) O ,- N M M N 40 � CO 0) r N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M NT 'Y It o 0 0) 60 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 IC) M O CD 0) N 0 0 0 0 ',"1":7; t 16 O O n N 0 0 CD 0 0 W 0 0 N M N CO CD 10 n 0 0 0 n 1■ � O O O N ' O n 0) V M N O pG ' OD n n C) N 0 M OD N 6C) ' ' J a O M n IC) N 0) r 60 CO 0 b M V 10 Of 0) 0 M N N t0 O N b r N CO IN O CO n n Of N Of CO 0) 40 N O N 4- 2 b T V N OD N 4 07 N �T eN- O - H W N N N N 0 d 0 C) 7 4 m 8 n - a CD N b b lV 4- IN 1t n O n 7 U! 49p p M N 69 to 19 8 M 8 8 8 4 8 . N 4R N b 0 O N v _ y N N n N C 7 63 63 63 63 M 69 69 69 69 16e� N In CI 0) 0 8 6D o co ri o ri ' LL v- 60 NN 6ND U) 0) _ >, <° °° i 69 69 69 H 49 69 69 69 K V►cn O 8 N 8 N O r) . p • , , N ^ N a ID O N 4 N 1t > n N N � Q 69 69 49 49 69 49 69 69 63 69 69 69 69 63 69 N 69 49 63 49 P g fu n8 8 8 88 0 a N rn 6p» , a O O b f0 47 N N- 4 2 a) (7 C ~ (O N M N LL 0 a 69 69 69 69 69 19 69 699 69 699 69 49 69 69 H 69 h H 69 69 69 69 63 69 N lb N V O In !n N Of O . , N § N ' b 0)N Y O) Co N n IL 60 it rl a W LL 69 69 63 69 63 69 69 CO 69 63 69 49 69 49 69 69 69 69 H H 69 H 69 49 N IA IOA 8 IA 8 a E O N M 60 C a-• 6o V3 69 63 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 63 63 H 69 49 H 69 69 H 69 69 H H 63 N 8 n O A O O 0 co N n N 6A 6p 69 69 69 63 69 43 69 69 69 69 63 69 69 69 19 69 49 49 63 49 69 63 69 69 H 8 ano 8 8 n S n 8 n to co co 0 co } b In N A IL fD .- QS U Of N M 0 2 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 49 69 63 69 69 H H 69 19 49 N 69 69 H N � 8 8 IA 6N+) • • • . , • , , , O N N Y 44)C4 8 n a M IL N N 0) Oy 69 69 69 40 69 63 63 69 49 69 H H 69 63 69 69 49 69 N 69 69 69 69 N ✓ O N CO N N N N- CO CO st LO CO N CO O r O O CO 1's CO 10 M ),sf M CO O N Cr) N r N (� O r r ✓ 1— 1� r CO f>s N- 1` O V' N CD r CO N CO r O CO O CO U 00 CO r a r r U U CO r 1,- ►n N O 1.0 ti 6(') Cr) N U r r r r C7 C7 O O O r r r r U — 00000 a) O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 CD to 6°n ° �°nin6Loininn �in CA (On6LO (nu7 (01.nI.01,010 (n1.n V' v V Nr Nt Nt 'Kt NI' st Tt Nr V 'V NI' Nt <7 (7) c c - c m ca CO (a ., c a aa N , 0 > 0 0 0 ..-R o aai ai N o v s . i_ v c c c c 2 N ,-c -c -c cD J c c c c . m _I _ • c 0 0 Cc c g 0 0 0 0 0 a Cu Cu co co a to —i co c Q rn rn o 0 U ¢ � li_� u_ u_IIIII E -, -, -, 2.2_2 a in inch - 16 ,. l' B 9 COLLIER COUNTY DIVISON OF PUBIC SERVICES Parks and Recreation Department 15000 Livingston Road - Naples, Florida 34109 - Phone (239) 252-4000 - Fax (239) 514-8657 Website: colliergov.net GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA June 7, 2010 I. Call to Order II. Attendance - Establish a Quorum III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes - May 3, 2010 V. Public Comments VI. Old Business A. Recreation Highlights - Vickie Wilson VII. New Business A. Monthly Budget - Annie Alvarez B. 2010-11 Budget Proposal C. Schedule for Summer Meetings VIII. Member Comments IX. Adjournment The next meeting will be on TBD at 6:00 PM Collier County Golden Gate Community Center 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Conference Room "C" Naples, Florida Misc. c ,) I~~ - " , C t) H U r " - :~"ies ~o . I,. .... . .-n / /' r-1812 . J,.." Halas ,/ Henning--{Jf )~"e " 2010 Coyle J Coletta MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY \VED GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER 16 I 1 RECE ADVISORY BOARD SEP , () 2mO ~ B9 >v r...on,misSloners Boord of Coun" Naples, Florida, June 7, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 6:00 PM in a REGULAR SESSION in Conference Room "C" of the Golden Gate Community Center, 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: VICE CHAIR: Jim Klug B ill Arthur Darrin Brooks (Absent) Peggy Harris Kaydee Tuff (Excused) ALSO PRESENT: Annie Alvarez, Regional Manager III Barry Williams, Parks and Recreation~ir= Sherry Pryor, Finance Department ISC. . Date: Item#: 1 -- 3 :J .". . 16 /1 B 9 June 7, 2010 I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 6:04 PM by Chairman, Jim Klug III. II. Attendance - Establish a Quorum A quorum was established. III. Approval of Agenda Jim Klug moved to approve the Agenda as submitted. Second by Bill Arthur. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. IV. Approval of May 3, 2010 Meeting Minutes Bill Arthur moved to approve the May 3,2010 Minutes as submitted. Second by Peggy Harris. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. V. Public Comments - None. VI. Old Business A. Recreation Highlights - Addressed after VII. B. VII. New Business A. Monthly Budget - Addressed after VII. B. B. 2010-11 Budget Proposal Sherry Pryor distributed and reviewed the Fiscal Year 2011 Proposed Budget. (See attached) She stated the Budget proposes a full 95% of the transfer from III with 5% cost to General Fund. She further reported: ~ Taxable values as of June l5t dropped 24.95 % ~ The current mileage rate is .1791 ~ The proposed MSTU mileage rate is .2121 The Staff advised the Advisory Board if the MSTU retains the current mileage rate at .1791, they will need to eliminate $127,900 from the 2011 Budget. Sherry Pryor recommended the Advisory Board approve the FY 2011 Proposed Budget as presented. Otherwise the MSTU will loose $70,000 from the General Fund. The proposed budget allows the Center: ~ $60,000 for Playground Equipment. ~ Retain current Staff positions. ~ To fill some vacant positions ~ To keep the Reserves fairly stable. Annie Alvarez stated the after school van was the only item cut from the budget. 2 16 , 1 B '9 June 7, 2010 Discussion was made on changing the mileage rate from .1791 to .2121 and options. Staff stated County is mileage neutral. The effect on the MSTU will be approximately $3.30 on each $100,000 taxable value. It was decided to change the mileage rate to .2121. Bill Arthur moved to approve the Proposed Budget as presented. Second by Peggy Harris. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. Sherry Pryor stated the initial budget has been reviewed by the County Manager. The FY 2011 Proposed Budget will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval on June 24 and 25. C. Schedule for Summer Meetings - Addressed after VII B. VI. Old Business A. Recreation Highlights Annie Alvarez reported · The gym floor was installed. · The gym was painted. · The bleachers are scheduled to be installed within 60 days. · Summer Camp starts Monday, June 14th. The Staff stated the Summer Camp registration was down compared to last year due to economic times and teen camps will now be held at each Center instead of two locations. The Staff also stated they will receive camp registrations the same day Summer Camp begins. It was noted Vickie Wilson organized a Summer Camp Training Program and trained Staff and Volunteers for Summer Camps which included participants from the City of Naples, Lee County and other nearby community agencies. The Staff reported Kristina Apkarian left from her position with Collier County Parks and Recreation for a position with the Collier County Museum. Jim Klug suggested Staff find a replacement as soon as possible. Jim Klug inquired on the status of the field lighting. The Staff responded the project is in Purchasing and will be going out to bid. A Purchase Order had been cut for the engineering. Barry Williams stated he would research the status and email the Advisory Board on the status. VII. New Business A. Monthly Budget 3 . . . 16 11 June 7, 2010 89 Annie Alvarez distributed and reviewed the Monthly 130 Fund Report. (See attached) She reported the budget was on schedule. The Staff ordered table and chairs for the Center. The Staff stated the Golden Gate Community Center received an enclosed trailer to store equipment from the Immokalee Center. It was noted Jim Klug will attend the Board of County Commissioners Budget Hearings scheduled on June 24 and 25 to represent the GGCC MSTU Advisory Board and the FY 2011 Proposed Budget. C. Schedule for Summer Meetings Discussion was made on the Summer Schedule. Jim Klug moved the next meeting be held on August 3(/h and to resume the first Monday of the month meetings starting in October 2010. Second by Peggy Harris. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. VIII. Member Comments - None There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was moved and seconded to adjourn. The meeting adjourned by order of the Chair at 6:45 PM. COLLIER COUNTY GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY BOARD ..1/1 ;;:(ut~ ~ ~~- ~. W. James Klug III, Chairman These Minutes were approved by the Committee/Board on presented >( or as amended t), 30 -/0 ,as 4 161jB9 , . . Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2011 Proposed Budget Public Services Division Parks& Recreation Department Golden Gate Community Center(130) Mission Statement To benefit the well-being of the people,community,and environment of Collier County. FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 Program Summary Total FTE Budget Revenues Net Cost Golden Gate Community Center 7.00 802,060 453,900 348,160 The Golden Gate Community Center serves as a meeting place for community groups and provides structured programming for all ages via classes, activities,and special events and offers informal gathering opportunities throuah open aame room and droo-in recreation oroarams. Childcare/Preschool,Afterschool,No School,Vacation Camp 0.50 60,062 68,400 -8,338 Strive to meet family needs by providing a safe and supervised environment for all children to attend throughout the year. Provide recreational and enrichment experiences for self-esteem,self-reliance,learning,pleasure, health and well being. Community Center Maintenance 1.00 194,978 - 194,978 Protect resources,provide a pleasant,clean,safe and enjoyable environment for community center visitors to allow quality passive and organized recreational experiences by the public. Reserves/Transfers - 124,200 659,000 -534,800 Current Level of Service Budget 8.50 1,181,300 1,181,300 - FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2011 Program Performance Measures Actual Budget Forecast Budget Fee Based Facility Rentals 641 750 650 650 Fee Based Program Registrations 2,358 2,800 2,400 2,400 GGCC Memberships 518 300 450 450 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 Program Budgetary Cost Summary Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Proposed Change Personal Services 445,620 550,800 491,600 518,700 - 518,700 (5.8%) Operating Expense 283,771 371,500 368,000 384,800 - 384,800 3.6% Indirect Cost Reimburs 289,200 77,400 77,400 90,600 - 90,600 17.1% Capital Outlay - 132,500 110,000 60,000 - 60,000 (54.7%) Net Operating Budget 1,018,591 1,132,200 1,047,000 1,054,100 - 1,054,100 (6.9%) Trans to Property Appraiser 3,117 3,000 3,000 3,000 - 3,000 0% Trans to Tax Collector 7,418 9,200 7,100 8,000 - 8,000 (13.0%) Reserves For Contingencies - 61,000 - 37,000 - 37,000 (39.3%) Reserves For Capital - 72,400 - 79,200 - 79,200 9.4% Total Budget 1,029,127 1,277,800 1,057,100 1,181,300 - 1,181,300 (7.6%) Total FTE 12.50 9.00 9.00 8.50 - 8.50 (5.6%) Fiscal Year 2011 3 Public Services Division Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2011 Proposed Budget 16 J 1 89 Public Services Division Parks & Recreation Department Golden Gate Community Center (130) FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 Program Funding Sources Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Proposed Change Ad Valorem Taxes 367,535 369,800 349,900 321,300 321,300 (13.1%) Delinquent Ad Valorem Taxes 1,945 na Intergovemmental Revenues 66 na FEMA - Fed Emerg Mgt Agency 529 na Charges For Services 181,711 191,300 175,500 189,500 189,500 (0.9%) Miscellaneous Revenues 7,821 6,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 25.0% InterestlMisc 7,995 8,000 4,500 4,000 4,000 (50.0%) Trans fun Property Appraiser 514 na Trans fun Tax Collector 3,419 na Trans fin 111 MSTD Gen Fd 525,200 392,700 392,700 373,100 373,100 (5.0%) CaIT}' FOIWlIrd 367,100 338,300 438,800 311,800 311,800 (7.8%) Negative 5% Revenue Reserve (28,300) (25,900) (25,900) (8.5%) Total Funding 1,463,837 1,m,800 1,368,900 1,181,300 1,181,300 (7.6%) FY 2010 - Personal services are forecast $59,200 below FY 2010 adopted budget by delaying the hiring of two (2) approved personnel. Ad Valorem revenues are down approximately 5% due to a diminished level of collections. Carryforward has increased because the Community Center had a substantial tum-over in personnel in the prior year, resulting in savings over budget. Additionally, the carryforward offsets the reserve for capital replacement of the roof and air conditioning at $72,400. FY 2011 - Personal services are less than FY 2010 adopted budget as the Community Center removed a part-time position. Total FTE's decreased by one-half (.5). Operating Expenses increased slightly over the prior year predominanlly due to increases in IT related charges and facility and equipment maintenance, The indirect cost reimbursement process was changed to reflect just the Golden Gate Community Center direct portion of this fee in the prior fiscal year and the portion that is funded by the MSTD General Fund (111) is paid at a top-level and the transfer from the MSTD General Fund (111) is reduced accordingly. The same methodology was utilized during the current fiscal year. The indirect cost reimbursement allocated to the Golden Gate Community Center Fund (130) increased by $13,200. Capital Expenditures of $60,000 are for playground replacement at the Community Center, Reserves for capital indude funding set aside for the purchase of a roof and a new air conditioning system. Current FY 2011 totals $79,200 which represents $45,100 for the air conditioning system and $34,100 for the roof. No additional funding was added for the air conditioner as this accumulation has reached the projected replacement cost. The budgeted ad valorem tax revenue of $321 ,300 represents a tax levy of 0.2121 mills based on an estimated taxable value of $1,514,527,739 (24,95% decrease from prior year). The tax levy represents an increase in millage rate of 0.0330 mills over that levied for FY 2010. This equates to an increase of $3,30 per $100,000 of taxable value. The rolled back rate for 2010 for Golden Gate Community Center is 0.2386 mills which would represent a 0.0595 increase in mills ($5.95 per $100,000 of taxable value) over the millage neutral levy. Should the Golden Gate Community Center MSTD elect to adopt a millage neutral budget, the MSTD General Fund Transfer would be decreased by $70,000 and the ad valorem revenues would decrease by $50,000. The current budget as presented would need to be reduced $53,900 from operating; $60,000 removed for capital expenditures; and reserves would be reduced to 2.5% instead of the current 3%. Fiscal Year 2011 4 Public Services Division '0 a::GI wOO ...: Zz we uGI ~~ ~~ :Ii '0 :lie( O' u... WW ...0 e(o o~ zlO w.... o~ ~N 0> 011.. " CD 0; :::J '0 .. .. CD ..u CD c: ~ CD :::J co ~ c:: ",., ~ 5 Q.O lij 0 s': o CD f-a: 01 o a> CD ~l~ ~'.'..'. ", ..r:; ","'" tl ~ '6 .5 ]i .s o o co on N N ~ 1: ~ 8 .. 'll. " 0: () 00< ~~~ ~~8 "''''0: 00g2oooo00 ~2(DO g ~gg ';~.ID.o ,.: oicrico ~ NC:O CO') ,.... '" N ! '& '" ~o~o ;~~~ ~i~i ... j 0000000000 0000 0 000 1l)C')(DO CD NOO "':rio"; 'V. O'J.riai OIOQ')N ~ "" N ~ ... j 8888ogoooo NO'JOO N ::-g~~ &f "N~ ... II) w fI) z W D. X W >, g ci Gl) Q) Q.-: .,: a -<Co 8i ~~~ci~ ~Q.J9>._o~cae(U CD all !ilg gO"",oa.f- ~ g-u8';: Z ~~~ 5e~~~~~~~~ ;CD:5g.i~::g~~ a. 8'.50 a: a: a: 0:: f-f- )( '" ::::;: > o CJ .s ... " CD .c: " o o ai ~ 00 00 ON ~~ ... 00'0 000 "'0'" .iD": ~..... ,~~ ......... o o C!. ~ OIl '" ... o o .. .; ... .. ... II) W II) Z w a. X w ...J <( f- a f- )( .. ::::;: > o Cl .2 .. l!! a: < ~ .E'E'E ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~(lri :g ~]ii! ~ ~ "g. ~ ~ ~ U CD t- 000 0- 000 0 lX)NCD en ~a)N u;) M""r.3 r:! !!! ! '&'&'5. '& U)tJ)CJ) U) 00000'0 000000 OOCDNCO...... "':.r:-ia;a;u;) Q) t'?,....-...... ~ N 00000'0 000000 co CD ON m...... ai....... M c>> C"'i CIJ- ,.... m,.....-..... 00000"0 000 0 N"'ltCO m ftJ- N en u;) ~ '" ~ II) w ::;) z w > w a: ~~~ :> CD CD 1.0 Q) ~ ~ g> 0:: _a:0)~ ~ m~~~ ~ c: 0.. c: ]l ~(l~~ E.I ~~~~ ~ Cu Ci ~ E o !! CD ~ oeu;OO~O ~~~~~~ CD-caCUQ)-C 1.1..5000::<( o o O!, co co ... o o co N '" N o o "1. ;1; N CD :::J c: ~ ~ ]i .s .c :::J '" 00 00 o~ LOe? .,.. ~'" o 8~ .n'~. "'.... .,.<<> ~ >, .c ~~~ Q.~ .I!lE .. 001= " ~ t)~ CD .. ~ c: '6 [!! .5f- 3 ; .so!! 1;5 *~ "'= N 8 " )( 1ijlll ~s CD CD .. :::J CD c: ~ CD CD > ::l ~ ~ E ~ ~ '$.(ij "'-i; .. II co i~ i~ CDO c: E ~ o .. > " <( CD c: .~ CD a; "0 .sg ...: "3~ E ,f... o o "'- N '" 00 00 .... .,;.,: ~... ~~ o o "1. N '" o )( o '" "t::::;: '" > '" 0 "'Cl .2 .. l!! CO < o o o ... N co .. w ::;) z w > w a: ...J <( f- a f- 16jlB9:~f CD :::J ~ ~.!! j~ .!!sQ) ~i= )( .. ~ ~ 8.lil ~eo -= Q.- eno" o~-e ~~< ;:1; ~'rI T- ""'" --_C"')~ P ..---:It e :::;.13! qLO.:'_~ co ..,.;~ e ;n~ N- ~;~,I g ..: ... e .. ... Q eno~ "'ON .."'~ "':":C\1 NNO "'''' .; "t :l Q ~ " ,g ,SII) :SW "f- 8~ ..w ::JCl i< >...J CD= It::::;: CD :::J c: .. ~i~ ~ 0::: . ~~~ ~.2~ lll~" ~~.; 1il-E >,- ~.o. S-cw ~~:: ,., > ..- >- W~LL. 'i'- CD .. .. ~ " CD " co -e <( 'i'- '" en .; N ~ ~IO 0 NCbMC') N~gM cicici CDS-CD ~~~i Q) Q) ! b QCDUc: cuftlQ)- ==OCD :E::::;:'i~ -cOco> S~~O ~~"g ;I So .. 0 w ~ ... :: it ... ~ co u l!5 .!! a; CO " :::J .c .. = ~ J2 CD .c ?; ~ 3 ~ i l!5 -= .. .. .~ ; -~ .. c: i f ~ 8 '" ~ )( '5 ii ~ ~ > ~ o " Q. " <( CD " c: :::J :i ! ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ;a i ~ ! ; ~ Su. l! c: jg;: i ~ ~~~ e ~ :~2 CD ~ 0i..,S .8 i .2"Q.t! '" CD ~l!tS ~ ~ .!! &~ o ~lti ~ g j ~'t:i;llhEe o.!!~o~~~ ClJ8"t-g....t-1- ~a;NC)M..,:tri >- .c " ~ E .c ::l .. .. '" ~ .. ~ ij i .. c: .cCD j~ e 'E ~8~ ~":."! N~~ coco.. ~"'N ..... o Ii; a. o o N ~ )( .. ~ a; co " ::l al :: >- 1.1. o g CJ ~ a: .., .. ~ .. ~ .. .!! u: a; '" " :::J !!l Ii: >l1 o on N o goii; - iii '" 1!_~ 8,~., o a. l!! efla. ,g g ~ .. SO! SO! g:5 ~ ll) CS 00 '" : ...,. 0' '" .... ~onCO_N Z n ::J o ~ W j:: !z f . w~ U CD ~z _ CD ~J ~= ~~ 0' ulij WC) ~Q C)::J i~ I ! 'a. Ul ~O~~ ~~~~ ~!~! ~I ~ "0 '" OJ ::J '0 '" ., '" en .0 ~ :ii ::J 0> ,'" c: "0:;:: c: c: 8,0 xO W~ _oS! 3., 0'" 1-0:: ~I !I ~ '0 .!:; S $a o o CD tri' '" '" " ~ i a: o 00< ~~~ !is UlUla: gOgOOOOOOO o 0 000 ""0) CD Naco ~gl!i ~ ~...,.<o on"'", ... ; 0000000000 000 0 000 It)'''ft'CO co Naco "':NO. ci aiMco OMC) ......,... "'- ... 0200000000 ~lIlg ~ ~eO.n ...: ......CDM ...,. "'-- ... g ci en CD a.--= .,~ g> o;<Co P3~ ~:e-acic; ~ Q.. co >-_ 0 ~ CD e CD ",xOj"'go""OQ.1-- (/)WO~a::'IIOO 1& g>>u 0 CD : : = -:: :: ~eo~lil~~~~~ 1!Q)~a.Q.u)CfJCI)ffiffi tf8~~~~&~~,= x '" ::;: > o C) $a .>< u '" .r= u o o '" tri' ... o. ... 00 00 00_ m- COR o gggg ~ 0 '1""" '1""",."...; ...... Gt"'liI')ao 'I""..~ctll) ... ... ......... o o ... 0' '" on =g~ :E "',ci >... 0... Cl'" ,g '" e 0> < ... o o "'!. ... '" II> ... Ul W Ul Z W Q, )( W -' ~ o I- '1:l i '" '" .. ..!!! "' '" e '"' ;: ~ .E'E'E ~~~ ~~~ ~8 fl fl~~ :Sg-~ {!.u ~ aoo a 000 0 CONCO ...,. ......- oiN- M C;;r--.~ ~ !!! ! :a.=&=& '&. UJcncn en 000000 000000 OOCONCOCD ,...:..- c...,r a) m- C"') CD C"),.....-...... '" 000000 000000 COCOONmco co-~M-oiMM ,.... 0),....-...... ~~ ,0 ~ '" 00000'0 ~~:il al eONm- 10- ;=: ~ - Ul W :::> z w > W 0:: Q)~- ~ ~ ~ ;> r/) .~ CD CD CD'" CD a:: 15 ~ ~~ }A ~cu~Q) ~ ~:a-:J Os ~8~~ ~ ~~ m& ~ Cam~E o_~~~* ~ ~~~pj CD CD"""" >> ,fE88~~ o o ... ,,; ao ... o o on '" '" o g ..,: on '" Q) ::J c: '" > l!! 0; B .0 ::J CIl 00 00 0_ IliM "'0 -'" 00 g~ uiM <'>0 ~C') >- .0 "0; 0;- e. - '" E ~.:: u ~ 0_ '" '" ~ c: :c~ .!:;I- s ~ .9~ b 0 ~~ ~8 '0 x c: '" "'- ~.E Q) Q) '" ::J Q) c: - Q) Q) > ::J l!! lii E > ., ~ 0 ~~ i:j II ctl Q)1O "0", ~ci E l!! o 0; > "0 q; Q) c: 'E :;; a; "00 B~ "''': '5... E'" &~ o o (0) ooog ~~~..: f/O...,..;,..: "'CD ::...:- ... '" o o o "'. ;::: '" o x o to "'.:E CD > o 0 onCl ~ II e '" < o o o ... N '" CD '0 Q) "0 ., c: E w :::> z w > W 0:: -' ~ o I- o 0; > ~ o (0) 1611' B9 .... '" ... ci ... on ci ~ '" o ~U) ~~ 8~ Q)W ::.Cl "'< ~~ It:E '" ::J c: II ~!~ ~ 0: . ~~g' ~.2i 3~"O ~~-! ~~E -c ~;: S-c~ E~:: ~~it Q) ::J 0; > ~.!! ~.g .!!SQ) .g-g:Q 1,j '" l!! - 8. u 7U 0 CD c: ~ 0 I; Q.._ 0.0'" 8c;-B ",,,,q; -.."" ;:lj~ -...' ..,.:,..:^ 0"'6 ~~-.............. ;:; U;'S N T""'--:Si) e en 0... (0)0'" ..."'... ,....~'r"-~ "''''0 on", .... lq, ,)J<.. ,c_:;>.;;, - -~o eneno ......0 --0 000 SB'i) '" '" '" o::o::m Q) Q) ~ O>O>U '" '" '" ==0 ~~'i "00" '" - '" ~~~ _ c: OJ - w ;: >- LL. ;i1. '" '" '" l!! u ., "0 0; ::J ~ ;i1. on en . '" ~ 0; '0 IE o .!! >- .0 a; -g .g> 1;; ::J E .0 .0 '" ::J :5 .. l!! :Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 'E ~ IE .g 5l ~ c e '\.. ~ ~ j '" III _ ~ ~ 8 -5 ~ ~ "0 > ~ ~ ~ ~ "0 c: ::J C ca li cu :; > S CD 0 '" .r= E ~ 13 OJ "'_ Q) '" .8 .r= ~ E BOIll) f! E sg;: 1l 2 ~~~ g CD :Co2... c ~ :C1!.2 ~ ~ j~~ .g : ~~ti ~ ~ .!! 8~ ~ 8,..:.g.!!!j ~-o~~see o!~g~~~ Ulol-C)I-I-I- ~~N(!)M~Lri ~ .><:> u '" '" c: .0", "00> .!!Jg ee ~g~ N...", ~,.:,.: !!lSl~ N o o ~ ... <a x '" )( Gi 0> "0 ::J III ;: >- LL. o o C) ~ '" 0:: oll ~ ~ '" .!! ii: a; 0> "0 ::J !!l u: Ii x- * 0 M. 0 • CD C p,H IW HH b (D tai FC 8 O 'Ox 7JL -30 II cct((D W IH mmmmmmmmmmmrnrnrnrn 01 07 01 01 01 01 0n01CnCn C1 0n0nrJrowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwmCJp. tQ H r1 0 .4.4,4,.A.AiA.PWWWWWWWW:: 6.)NIV NNNNHHHHHH7OL'J CI)(Am 01 01iN.xNxNA.PiAiAiA.A.A.AF-'FA<m - Fi H WHHH000t6 to.P.P.A.A.P.P J.A WWNNHWWNNNNCA ZtOtp t661HJJJJJJJJJJH HHtJZOF3 Ct P HtO IOJ�PWNIOIOtOIOIONNN.::..NHHHCAHHNHmJ61HOCn,101WtDwt0t0 l0 l0 IO l0.PNN MJ N)HZC 0 E ID 0 00100H00CCtOCJHH0, _.006101000000000ZLT10NOONtO.A H0000tOJW�A OOCCJ Ct 0 H 000000001(TFIO00HO. .F O00000o000000�W O1000000H00Ut W000000OCJW OW .i C' tuR0; H; h7rOHHHOHI1 t-. t U]COHE-).M Eno X 0HHM�H CA 'P WEI 10-4 11 * *MHH N r7 L Ot�t�O;;OOHt1OHZZZH'TJH -:r0HL7rL10CnH tixiLiti PHLi0ZZ�'�' P.ym'dL�HLOLL1 O Hn CC/1W O [iCnrrHycn0XHCJ 'TJ rid'=iy�rHnHxWr O�1HU)WHZHCnnn KWm0x '�1r (HtJ . XJOOI- HH'U pzim> wp:I ] OHni-ii- 1-3-'O�HHroPi ui H xn H� �HH nH[7H ���1yN OH H O 0 HpyO ti M()FA0)nr Mr::0CnZ H 7dEnMx El H, t1'�iUiCnnHHL1H HH 0 iH FC 0NZ7�O'd ZH0'dHHy�O''1Hi WH�j 1010 t00ry Hi<0 HHFCFC 0 HO OCCH X HHHI O`,d',UHXZH ZH rn ZWZH0 Z U) t 7JH H nZHt1O m t10 H HO Ht-10 ;OWH OOH r0 CnrHn NCHi HH00 CnCZ'd FC G) 0 W FCNCDN ZJHO �ro0 00 X C to C"� 'dOP.ZLr HZ [ii ;Ow 00 N W HFCti K Ei PCnMX roro U H I Z HZ �ZZO ZO0H1H Cn Z 0 wHi d H0HE30 H xL�n H1 H t1W I7 Cn HHH cnH G]7dM' H Ti M p. 0 Ct H 'i7 0 .A W0nH WU7C10101 (D C .A J H .0. H W WNHJ O U1 W CON N N H H H 616161610) p. C) 00 Cn W 1-01 `.0.01 00 CO .A U)`O N H N ON) 61 61 H .0.N N O H O N lfl)J 0n 01 0 0 C)N CO J H.A61010H .AHIO t.0 OlW.A .0.0CTM OJ00N 0 010 C)O.AW000l HH COHHHH r.. W H 0000000000 000 0 000w CONCIN 0000 0 00 00000000 00000 9000(1) HH 0000000000 000 0 OCON 0.A.1=.0 ONOO O 00 00000000 00000 M000 P. CL-q--1) OM 0000000000 000 O 000 0000 0000 0 00 00000000 00000 M000 Oh 0000000000 0 0 0 O 000 0 0 0 0 0000 0 00 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 l tNH P 0 I II 11111111 III 0ZZ0 OO G)0F'• MO a > 0 ►'•p HH0 00 aL.IMH 0'4 H■ NnnH 0- .A WCnH W(nOlU1U1 X000 WM 61 .A J H .A H 00 WNH • OCnU) MN NNHHH 616161610) _ '0 X OH 0 01 W Hon J.0.U1 0 CO .A U)ON HNON 61 61H .ANNOHON w J01U1 C XX • U)0 n ON)COJ H.p C(10H a=.1-Lip to C) C) .0.00101 OJOON O 070 00.4.W001HH OHHHH G- CA ZnN UP. 0000000000 000 O OCW CON01N 0000 0 00 00000000 00000 f' Cl) HZC1• Ha 000000000 000 O OCON O.p.A0 ONOO O 00 00000000 00000 , H H '-30 • :. wFc H H 0000000000 O o 0 O 000 0 0 0 0 0000 O 00 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 E;'. G H OOOOO00000 000 O oo0 00o0 0000 O oo 000000OO 00000 trn p. I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I Z 0 OH .7F, rtt7 a x 70 I00 O H N O 0 HN r W w J lfl lO WW Z rn rn CM 01 lfl rn rn 0)01 0 H n O X N HWCn W.0..0.HH • 0HC7 .0. N J H 61 H 61 HH W 61H10 .AH H N.A.0.0710 n HH.¢7 W N JNJ OINH W WW10.0. WW )WH C lOH W 01.0.JNW 010000 Z H•0 ct H (D (D (D t0 JN .A JN.A D.0.JHO1JW0161C6 JCnH001N.A 0110 COW JWW■4.01NW .0.01WW.0..4 0 01JWC .0. MOO OCOHH0.AN0nl6.A CC1HH.0.W.AN WONl0t0HU1CHHCOWCU1.ANCOCOCn01 It .0.J.AW J 000 O101000H.AH61W HHO (00.000WOCfC0WU1000fW0H-1WO-1COCO01 HO . W 01 61 .0.HOOJ W WOO O1000N00000C 0761 N000 00 061J00J6I.AOD.0.0W0C10H000101Ol( W C).. H.A 1061 CI' 0100 0C100n0000.0.N WO.p O61.pU'1NCn0000.c O0JNON000.P.PW�INNWW ONO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0-) .. C1 N O -AO 0 H ✓ o 0 N H ■N.A HHWU Z N N H N HHHW WW.0. W H .0.NNNN .0. W W H01m .0. NC .0. HW WNOCOW )JC N 61W H6101.0.010 .0.616100 0 OH0.4.H.0.HO .OWN HIO.4.JHOINHU1JH01C0lHHH0n61 0110 0161 N0.0.0NNW .0.NHH.0..A H .4NCH00010000 00C.AH0.4.001CCU1O1O1HC0161ON WONOOH.AWCCHCW.A.pHHHIO'.O N 01N(n000N00J0 0010000JO0HWO.ANHO61NW0100WO 0n10100.4.N.4.JIOIONOIONHH.0.0. 0 01CO ■NOOC100100 OOIO.AN000C1OWO.A61 NOH10.A61JOOJW00010610.A000100.0..A.0.00 0 10C ■.0.000100.A0 00000000061 COHD0.0.C1ON000C61NJCCN0006161WWCCHH X I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I X US ' 0. z H , H H H )W.0..4. J Ut O W J JJJ 0101 .A 0010161 .0. 010 10.0N J61NNCII OOH Ju .0.0JH .0. 61 0 .A .0. 0101077 0.a, C H0161O CC JN W00C H.0.HCW OJJWW _ B9 - HH- „rnmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmo mm mmrb.1 1070101(7'101010101 7(51(5101 f 010101(10101 A AAA.AAAAAAAAAAAiAAAAAAAAAAAA A AwwHAAAA NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNHHH1-H(0(0(0(0(0CDHmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm(5101AAW W W HCTIHHW WNHtO(001(0(0(0Ha01AWNJHHH(0(ONH(010000HH(0(0H01AAA W W W W W W WHHNJHma1AW J(1100>)HHH(0(O0(0AHNHH(OHHAWHWHHH(0W WH0HHHHHH01 U)NJ -'HHHHH(0H00NJ000 00H0t-'0000(0NJ1-`000000000000000000(.7100000000NJ000010)Hm(.tH00000000 rH°coHUWITIM WoXXXrx rororo00XX000o r O hj000Xror' 1- �iXMWWt0HrH dC+t�H yHC O>rH H HO MOMtAtHHHOMH'W I-0 Wi-”),N �rr W tJ IAtO WZM W '›O xH OI-IMMM'�17a C)bjC”.LL''77W O`WOOZ7-i'gtT]xLL��77II77(7�t'-+1 Hxl-Plo mm m zHx;UHHou4vzH Hczw> `iHmxzonmooH mrHumHHOOl-cHr�rc�mm Zm›HxFCmm mnoZrHrrro mHtim OI-�HOH H mHHH'JJ ;do tJ OxZWWHOWHIMzm H7I OHG)HHm xHHCJzOOM �i 7Jx HCC Oy! HJ;d �v xOZHH ZM H m HH roL1Zz 01-3 z Hx HH,U tni Ct�iztni HzzrozHHO Or1C C�ro�ZZOOG� tt=iHHZti tiOXX QWHL-+ZZH Leo HOG�1�L7�J C7 OOOro ro L� GiG�'�i'=i WHozm zG)OOt=J tdHH rot>IQQ1-COoc cf)HtiZ H �V]�>mHmC.C�5r� Ul�p HH01dQ 1-3 NO,9HLbicO ZZm�S xm H�Hro �roOH Z (mC pmptiroHcniA>mZno rom Ztni ZromHO I- H HoOm ZOroXm C" rim H K I-do �H HroroZWxH1zCJt1LJ rr riCCC1 <ZZ- (CCU mrortn z zxr��c mm �u �ti Z W dOc H;JHrm tfiztniH G)Hrh1H Pc) �1H moroH1-HO Ht1 mHOC"ZMZ › H N W N W H H H W H H CT1HUIHNN HNNA))H NWN(n HH W0(OW H NOOW HN (nNANAAHCn00)N)Hal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . . ■ 00001(11W )A001010100 1 A 0000 NU10100 a1 NA O N 0 N0 0101. 100000001000 H 01 A H 00 000000 000000000 0000000000000 O PPP 0000000000000000000 000000 000000000 0000000000000 O PPP 0000000000000000000 O O O O O O 000000000 0000000000000 O 000 0000000000000000000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000 0 COO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H N CONW HHH W HH 01HUIHNN HNNA))H NWNUI HH W01(OW H OOODW HN CTINANAHU1U1p)N)Hal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0000101W ).AOU1U1U1OOU1 A COOONU1U1001MNAO N ONO U10A(00000001000H(OAHOUI 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NN WW WAU1 H A HH JJH M Aalal 00 JA NO 01.-K0 N al N 001 HHW C) alal al A 000 A0 )NJ 0 0 W JW 01 000 al NNW H al0 WO NJ ■ CO W O A WO A 000 0 W--IM J WO NO 01HO H J 0 0 NO 0 000 0 AA aI H A0 00 OW00 H U1 0 0 NO W H H H H M al H J)O H HWH H JH HH N A01H JA A A(OCD) WOOH H01 AN N HA4=.U1))H MH H (OW01 N M AHWOOCTIW (0 (OHON NW-.3J OJ NH A WJJ(0000A01HO (0 AW) CT1 0 0JN(0a10 A A(001 OJ01W CON H(0 al U1NCOWOOCO HN al WAD 0 N J000.-3N (0 (OOWO )NJ(0 NU1 --IN J UIN(0A0000IH0 N --UDC) 0 J 00J0(0N N NOA0 A)H(0 (OW OOH (0 OJN)00(WOO Cn UINO 0 0 00NOJN O (0 H H 0ACTINNHH HNNWA H NNW H NWCIH J H H U1NANAHHA 01H WWN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■ . . . . . OUIONNNOOJAO0101HUIHA CONOJAC510 UI(000A)AHOU100 A01 (OW00000a1OWJ)J )AH 000H(OU10H0000HO0N UINO(OHOH 00001O0DOAA00(0 000fW0000001O(0)AN COWA 0010001H0100000a1001al 0JOH(000 ON00000000000 00)A00000000J)W01 ONW • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O O O O O 0 al O 0 A 0 CO N O O 000001000. 0 O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 00-] 00000C0OAOOOOONOWH OJOOOHOH 000OAO0C0J(00 000N000000000000 OW0 I I I I I I I I I H N W H H W • H J HWA H HH(0 )A NO WO H AA U1 W LOU) (OW aI al H OOAHOH aI aI CO 0 001 CO A H W A A H 'All) N O (ON)al W W O N al J W N W N A 00 01 00100 J 161181ü IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. DECEIVED f ADVISORY COMMITTEE SEP 16 2010 fit) f, t �L Board of County Commissioners AMP r'a August 25,2010 Fiala AGENDA Halas Henning I. Call Meeting to Order Coyle Coletta II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes — June 23, 2010 V. Code Enforcement Report— Weldon Walker VI. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report B. Project Manager Report— Darryl Richard VII. Transportation Maintenance Report— CLM VIII. Landscape Architect Report— JRL Design IX. Community Redevelopment Agency X. Old Business A. Water Symposium B. Christmas Decorations XI. New Business XII. Public Comment XIII. Adjournment The next meeting is September 22, 2010 at 4:30 p.m. One Stop Career Center 750 South 5th Street misc. Corres: Immokalee, FL 34142 Date: t Item#:,hIC I cl) C--ias?o. • 1 6 1. 181 0 IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. / ADVISORY COMMITTEE i okay" '^`'' June 23, 2010 Minutes I. The meeting was called to order by Cherryle Thomas at 4:30 p.m. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Cherryle Thomas, William Deyo (Excused), Lucy Ortiz (Excused), Andrea Halman, Carrie Williams County: Darryl Richard—Project Manger, Michelle Arnold-Director ATM Others: Jim Fritchey—CLM, Darlene Lafferty—Juristaff III. Approval of Agenda Carrie Williams moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Second by Andrea Halman. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. IV. Approval of Minutes: May 26, 2010 Andrea Halman moved to approve the May 26, 2010 minutes as submitted. Second by Carrie Williams. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. V. Code Enforcement-Weldon Walker-None VI. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report Darryl Richard reviewed the following Budget items: (See attachments) o Revenue Structure received $300,823.64 Discussion ensued and it was determined the October Budget will reflect additional monies for the increased Taxing District. o Available Operating Budget $11,852.15 requires additional monies for Lighting repairs Carrie Williams moved to approve the transfer of$20,000.00 (from Capital Outlay to Operating Expense.) Second by Andrea Halman. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. 1 16 I 1 B 140 o NTP was issued to JRL Design (Sightline Study and Cross Walks) o Additional Property Value reductions are projected in FY10 - Staff will verify if the Boundary Expansion Properties are included in the Budget Report assessment Cherryle Thomas noted the Budget Report did not include a P.O. to address the shortage of Banner arms. Darryl Richard responded Southern Signal is conducting an inspection for required parts. Additionally a Parts List will be requested from the Electrician and monitored by Staff. B. Project Manager Report-Darryl Richard gave the following information: (/MM-21) Immokalee MSTU Irriaation Antenna Tower Proiect: o Irrigation Antenna installation is complete (/MM-20) First Street & Hwv 29 Survey o Survey is 40% Complete o Underground Utilities will be identified in the Survey (/MM-16) Miles ahead Sian o Project was delayed due to reorganization of County Division (Traffic Engineering and Sign Operations) o Locates are complete o Anticipate installation will commence shortly Water SvmDosium o Parks and Recreation was not enthusiastic of the selected area for the Project due to visibility concerns (safety) o An aerial of Proposed Project Area was distributed (See attached) Discussion took place on additional information that is needed for Committee consideration on the Water Symposium Project: o Design Plans o Installation cost assessment o Maintenance quote Carrie Williams moved that the Committee agreed (to change the location for the Water Symposium Demo to) the Project area that is outlined in the proposed picture that Staff represented of June 22, 2010 at the intersection of 846 and Hwy 29. Second by Andrea Halman. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. 2 16 111 B~l 0 VII. Transportation Maintenance Report-CLM Jim Fritchey reported: o Sightline Plant Material was removed (1st and Main) - Bahia Grass will be installed for aesthetics o Trash receptacle was relocated (Coral Palm Villas) - Trash overflow is still a problem _ An additional trash receptacle will be moved to the area as a remedy o Frost damaged Plant Replacements were installed - Plant Materials are pending to complete the installation o Trimmed Oak Trees to correct sightline issue (New Market and Hwy 29) Cherryle Thomas requested the status on Handicap ramps. Darryl Richard stated review of Handicap areas will be incorporated into the Cross Walks Project and coordinated with FOOT. Cherryle Thomas reported Lights are inoperable at the corner of 11 th Street extension (both sides). VIII. Landscape Architect Report-JRL Design-None IX. Community Redevelopment Agency-None X. Old Business A. Water Symposium-Previously discussed VI. B. B. Christmas Decorations-None XI. New Business The Committee agreed to cancel the July meeting. Carrie Williams moved to cancel the July 28, 2010 meeting for the Immoka/ee MSTU. Second by Andrea Halman. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. XII. Public Comment-None There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:07 PM. 3 16 1'1 8;10 Immokalee Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee ~S~i~:~ These minutes approved by the Committee on as presented ^ or amended )'-J--S--'O The next meeting is July 28, 2010 at 4:30 p.m. One Stop Career Center 750 South 5th Street Immokalee, FL 34142 4 1611 B . O . _ . _ ((0 c0 V 0) 01 0( C.) W N - 0 CO N ONO V 0) 01 A W INN - P.) <0 CO V 0) 0) A W N - 0 O CO V O) Vt A W N I CO (mn ',> 0 0 > > m m O I 0 m E O C 0 (zn Z > O - O 0 s 0 > O 73 > D ;< m m T 1- 70 ✓ m m Im O O Z Z —i -O 73 m m D z -1 -i 0 Z x H = m AJ Z Z > z vl x m z z m x, ( m > >m vcmm m -, -, m ,-,- rn - p K owo mzccbn � m m mmmOOmmm � m = D � G7!� O n D D O- O m O Zmj n m > Z m cD D z p Z Z m (An -f 73 x T m D Z p� rp D xj H! n z (zn m c D cn -o -1 r 7, -o 0 N z D D T m m n < O O n z m m n -o n m N o m o $ w Z K D m c - (n (n ? C m m D -0 c O m fn -I Z O m CZ7 >D > m 0 m 0 z O m o H C) r (n -U ; > (� Z m Z (�T1 'U m D O N c p 0 xi r m O fi M (mil M O y D r (Wll X -I 73 m j Z m -( m D o o O O m N h VI 'M 69 EA EA EA N EA (A 69 EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA fA EA 69 EA EA 49 EA EA EA EA EA EA 69 EA (A EA EA W D C3. CO 10) O) N <O O) O W W 0• a 0 -4. .+ N N A A -• _ ..A. O 0 -. O 0 (D e(D 0 O 0 W W I O) O) <D A " O - U 00 O <D A U - A „ 0.° 00000 $ ;00 $ g00 0 0 I0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D g (A (A EA SEA E9 EA (A EA li,(A ') EA EA EA EA EA EA Efi EA EA EA (A fA EA EA EA W 4) (A EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA C T O I C C O 0 Z 3 w C rn -' _ N 0) UI v. W W N Ul ) _, N J 7 0 N 03 4) W 0 CO N N Ul 0 A CO Cn Cn ON A A 0 CJ 0) A 0 CO 0) (9 O (A 01 O1 co O J O O Ul A , , , , , C•O 0) 0) A J 0) N (Il 0 • 0 A N N N O A CO 01 0 O J v+ (A EA N (A EA 43 EA 1 H EA H EA EA EA (A (A EA 69 EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 0 41 EA EA EA 69 EA (A EA EA EA EA (A M X 1g )30 1 N 01 _ (,J1 W W N Q d V 00 co N W co N N N A N OD co N to (O (Il J CO ; r. O; CO 00 Ww $ W - W w - N °40 (D in -co I W , , co O O o 03 O) O(yO J p0pp Co pNp , 01 O W O (O , 'co , <O 0 W 0 0 W O CO W (All O S W W A N A A -O) S S J 8 CO W v W 0) 0) v EA CO EA 43 EA EA 0 EA H EA EA EA EA EA (A (A (A (A (A EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 49 4► EA EA 69 EA EA 49 EA EA EA EA EA D O d a r1 • _ _ ((-,�. _ CT V 0 0 .+ j71 0 A m A N N O N co O Of Ell m A 01 CO �I (O O!tN N N F 0 O 0) J (p(1 ((0 A (gip N CO - o <.) W (Jl .0 -CO N 2 O O W l I W A & O O § N C7i UI 8 (0 O 00 <O O (D O O CO J O 03 O O co W V �1 O� CO 000 W 43 00 W O '<O O W 4) 0) 0) <OlG 11J -Co N 01 tt ' I(0 W I 61 O) if •C7 O CO O O CO . O C) ' 6) O IN O O if O V N CB N CJ 0) is!0 �0 ,N �J Icn F I O< CO t o ) co f9 I fO (D �O O O O A O (V 10 O 10 O _W - IW O EO � 161 1 610 ___ s c co o XI C m w`< m e c- c- c- c- c- ,- ,C ai n 3 3 0 0 m m m o o n owi ( ro �/cf/1 cc '' C C 0 *2 0�p 2 1�ap) ?�' ,• r Apr Apr Ppr 70 70 Apr X C 3 3 : 7 :, ra . 3 3 3 C N C 0 N D fD m N N m v fA 2 2 0 0 N N •-' 3 N N m `? O O N N N -i 7 _3 C cp C c Q 0 U) 3 fn fn Sn n m d 7 7 3 �. a_ o x x 3 (Tr, 7 111 �'i �i m m v pp °c m m CO > > > C o n1 o s m n n c d 3 fn fn CO 00m m w _m _m �+ cD 770 o o � o 7 7 7 . Ol co mg 7 03 V O• CO w D D N O N O fr V -' C7 ro N W N wV V A OD pW OVO A N 0 ((pp�� CN�1 Q .} Np O D W 0) Ca) as N O -1 W (D N -4 N W -.). 0 CO W 01 -4 CD N 0 (AJ1 O ONO 0 CO 01 NJ V (D CD C o8 $ - r O jr 198 � �fi' A zz zzz zz zzzzzz zzzzzz c° a` D (J1$ o D DDDhzi» i 1i1ii1i1DDDDDND � DD m Q Q V A oo CO d CD of v m m V a 2 g oc Ci 4t-61 c > m fD m 0 w -I -I r w 0 w r w w r r r r r r r r w 5 n -1 -I X1 K 0 CO -I c01 cn 13 W 0 ` m w C m fD O) of 01 flt w m m 0) CO O CD C nl o 0) 0) p 0) -9 C "o 0, o A 00 `., `� 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 7 C C C 0) .0 lo C) ¢ fD fD < 7 » 7 CO U fn o m fn CO CD m fD ya a d a Na Q qO_ tl 3 S S N 3 !D 7� fD rn fC (0 7 t� m fa -. 0 7 <<. 7 U D a s A gi n n C) 8 Cf n �: 7 K o ? u, m O g n ^G Oo <° 3 -0 n 0 > 3. 0) 0) pa pm 01 CD Du CD '< m (� G) p �cpn co N — 3 G N • Cn (n (n CD fD tD fD fD fD C C 'B co n fD n W N '� o 01 m z � m s m m u_, m m DDD DD � D ? � vv 3 fn ° °- °x w 0 j o 7' fn cD 2 3 3 Z. m 3 z 7 3 o 3 3 o i) d m w w m o CO CO 5' v r." O -1 co co o S S S S S S 7 S to 7 FS' tp cps m m ■in o' 2 7 �, w o O o •m N 0 cog g R fc, 2 8 8 :3 :3 m ? ? 0 m o m 7 3 TJ C r w fn tO r-° m c) m m ' @ @ @ @@ w @@ d CO m m _ -0 0 CA O c rn 7' 01 m fn o 0 ;ft m fn . z ? z z. � . zzn . . CD n m z Co a -4 to N C 0 i 2 § § 2 j w < O l ° z C) I to EA En En 6n En En En En En EA En En En EH En En En En EA EA Ea fA EA Eo to •En EA EA EA En En En EA En ffl cfi EA 0 G m M -< N 12 3 N O O W A UI UI Ul t3) N Cr) 01 01 -, 01 11) O c w to 01 N (P -Co -� N O ZO C4 CC) A 0 CO ---.1 0)) . 4 3. D cn A 0) O) CO j cn 0) CO 0) 0) 0 CO 0) Co 01 3 3 3 01 O Ja � O) V 0 CO O N 0) O , O O O , , O Upl ) co ,.f W °A C(il N 00)) 0 A 0 0 00 O 0 00 0 00 Q OV 00 0 O C' EA En EA EA Eft EA EA EA 4060 EA EA EA EA EA EA EA .6A EA EA EA EA EA in in EA EA En EA EA in in EA EA EA EA EA EA D WW As rt A N S A N N CO Co -A -A A Ul CO CO CO N -A cn Ul :J N C31 a C 10 V N N O CO 92 A N N e4 C-) A -4 A , O N 0 J g KJ KJ CVO , 0) 0 V 0) NJ -co 0 co W CO A -+ CO CO W V Coi CO CO V V A A O V O . CO N (11 CO CO co O O co O) N V O U1 (11 CO N CT O CO X88 8 � � � �' SABSS $ S88 882288888 00C.) 0o8rn 01 161 1BIO • -f i ,,, .... / . , ,_., ., .... , * . .. , * ,/, o _ , t Pt.1ESTO5 D >'y ' ' 5'Economy Shooting Star • , t f ` 1 r PMETRO5 B V of 5' Economy Tree tr. 4 0 ' 4114111;117:1111/4, , °' 1* .. ,t, • , 1 ., ... , I4i / " , 7,1'4$ .fit': 16J lBio Report Date: August 25,2010 Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Immokalee MSTU Project Status (IMM-23) - ACTlVE- Christmas Lighting Project 08-25-10: CRA Staff has provided 5 'selected' images for review by MSTU Committee, Funding for the project will be either 50/50 split between MSTU/CRA. Or will be 1/3 split between CRA/MSTU/lmmokalee Casino, Funding by Immokalee Casino is not confirmed, (IMM-23) - ACTlVE- Banner Project 08-25-10: Sample banner provided by vendor (Carrot-Top) for review and approval by CRAlMSTU, Upon approval production of90 banners will commence - w/ 10 banners per each ofthe 9 images provided. (IMM-22) - ACTlVE- Cross-Walks & Sightline Study P. O. #4500 118491 (dated 6-16-20 I 0); RFP #08-5060 Annual Landscape Architectural Services 06-17-10: Notice to Proceed sent to JRL (IMM-21) - ACTlVE- Immokalee MSTU Irrigation Antenna Tower Project 06-23-10: Antenna installation completed by E.B. Simmonds 08-25-10: Additional 'cabinet' for antenna to be installed by E.B, Simmonds (IMM-20) - ACTIVE- First Street & Hwy 29 Survey Professional Service Proposal for Immokalee MSTU (RWA, Inc. File NO. 100042.00,00) P. o. #4500116931 (dated 04/01/2010) Contract: # 06-3944 - Annual Fixed Term Surveying & Photometric Services 08-25-10: Survey is 80% completed. Pending Staff and consultant review, (IMM-19)- ACTIVE-1st Street Irrigation/Landscape Refurbishment Project 06-23- 10: 90%/l 00% submittal pending from JRL (IMM-18) - ACTlVE- Hwy 29 Irrigation/Landscape Refurbishment Project 08-25-10: 100% plans under staff review. (IMM-17) - ACTlVE- "Edgerrin James Sign" Request for Sign indicating "Welcome to Immokalee home of Edgerrin James" for motorist who are traveling to Immokalee 9-23-09: CRA to install 'sign' and MSTU is to provide for landscaping or amenities around sign (could include lighting) 02-24-10: CRA to report on status of 'High-school Children' producing sign concepts, (per suggestion made at 01-27-10 meeting) 06-23-10: CRA coordinating on project. (IMM-16) - ACTlVE- "Miles ahead" Sign Request for Sign indicating "Miles ahead" to Immokalee for motorist who are traveling to Immokalee 08-25-10: Traffic Operations is installing 6 signs at various locations (IMM-15) - ACTIVE-ONGOING -LA Maintenance Consulting Work Order for JRL; Landscape Architectural Services 08-25-10: Ongoing Services from JRL Design (IMM-II) - ACTIVE-ONGOING - Roadway Maintenance: BID #09-5264 03-01-10: NTP Issued under new Contract #09-5264, "Immokalee Road MSTU/MSTD Landscape Maintenance" 16 , '1 8410 {J.l N Ii ---, .... - n n ~ VI ~ .... r+ Vi' .... r+ III m 3 III ;j r+ r+ l1.l If III lI\ 0 .... r- Ill. '0 06' n .... 0 Vi' ~ ,.... III r+ lI\ lI\ - m ;j r+ !'" n - -c 0 3 > 'C -0 '" ::l =r ;u ~ 0 '" III .., ::l OJ III ,0 III ~ '" !" z n ,=r G'l < 'T1 > .-- n n \D n .-- \D \D I~ m .-- .-- m 0 0 m 0 Ire b .., -< ~ ~; I ~ IDl:3~ -g Q1 : ::l 3 .., III III ::l '" ~~ ~ I w t & i I- ~ I-' .N N O'l N :". I-' I-- \J1 -< III '" .., w ....... 00 ~ ~ N -.J N i.n o - ~ ~ 00 \J1 o (:) o - ell - ~ I[~ ~ ~r 1-4- ~ ~i a - 3 3 o ~ AI ii" /1) n ::a :I> n ::r ~ iii' r+ 3 AI 11\ _0 /1) n o ~ AI r+ o' ~ O:l c: -t AI C'" c ii r+ o' ~ ~ ~ JI .... ~ ~ ...... .,!D .... N .. 00 ~ !!!.. .... .... n g 0 0 o I~ J I ~ N N !=" 00 o ~ I-' ,0 N o O'l (:) o ~ ,00 \J1 ",. ~ 8 ~ \D -.J V1 (:) o !~ ~ .., II ~ -.J 8 (:) o ~ ~ 16 "1 B 10 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 40S Sth AVENUE SOUTH SUITE S NAPLES, FLORIDA 239-261-4007 O@)[Ji)@J~@@)[F)@ @)(P@[}uO~@@~~~ lfo@O@J (P@[F)@[ffi COPY TO: ~ OWNER D ARCHITECT D ENGINEER D CONSULTANT ~ _MSTU Committee_ PROJECT: Immokalee MSTU - POI 4500116856 CONTRACTOR: ClM REPORT NUMBER: JRl COMM No: 23 9003 Date: 6/24,7/16,8/4 Weather: Clear & Humid Estimate % Complete: N/A & 8/20/2010 Time: 11 :30 -1 :30 Temp Range: 95 Schedule Conformance: As scheduled PRESENT: July 16, Aug 4 & Aug 20: Richard Tindell, solo June 24: Jim from Commercial Maintenance, Darryl and Pam from Collier County & Richard Tindell WORK IN PROGRESS: Contractor present during 2 visits OBSERV ATIONS: Site is looking good, Little trash observed. Routine maintenance work has been performed. Many items noted in June report remain unresolved REVIEWS: Maintenance agreement, previous suggestions and work orders REPORT: Pre MSTU meeting drive through inspection - mowing, trimming, fertilization, soil fill behind curbs and plan replacement were discussed. Routine maintenance work has been performed and trash removed. In generallmmokalee continues to show a marked improvement. Little has changed since the spring - many of the previously reported problems have not been addressed and little progress observed. New photos were taken for record are attached although there is no major changes from the May report. Banner missing on First. (photo 1) Dead/dying foxtail palms are yet to be removed on both first and Main. This is an on going and previously reported. (photo 2, 3 & 4) Die back and decline in plumbago observed. Treat or replace Cold damage and missing crown-of-thorns have been replaces however dead plants were observed on Main Street on the August 20 ~ 16 11 fil0 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 5th AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239-261-4007 visit. (photo 5) Juniper has yet to be replaced at northern SR 29 monument sign. Reported in April (photo 6) Weeds are a problem through out. Although not part of the contracted maintenance service. overgrown areas detract from the improvements and add an air of neglect to Immokalee (photo 7) The broken bollard on Main near 51h has not been repaired or replaced. This was reported last May. (photo 8) note street debris still filling storm grate Dirt is collecting between new HC ramps and bulb out channels - it should be removed Another long standing problem is the trip hazards crossing the median on Main Street in town. This was reviewed at the June 2 site visit. The height of the curbs where they met the planting soil can cause tripping while crossing this busy road, especially for children. Other objects such as irrigation pipes and equipment boxes are also a problem. The efforts of the MSTU is having the desired impact and the citizens of Immokalee are showing "pride of place" The Main Street and First Street corridors continue to improve. They are neater and cleaner however, curb side planters continue to be a problem. Cemetery renovation shows new black metal fence along Main Street and black chain link around the rest of the property. The rear is screened with a hedge and small trees. The face has a stepped flowering hedge, a small tree to each side and a straitened / refurbished sign. New sod and an irrigation system would be a plus. Photos overall. before & after are attached. Proposed plant material conforms to previously approved materials. ACTION REQUIRED: Request more direction from County and MSTU Board. Reported by: Richard Tindell. asia, registered landscape architect LA767 ~, 1. 0 1 r .; BIG (....) , ! . .,-...,.:.-z:;,.., .,...„.. •._ •.,1, At ''',.:.%;.• .2 '111741).•,:i.,,',t,f,•••.,.f' -.''.: ,*.',.;•,.;474:,. :• ....f ir••*'-'. - = , r , ' ,.= .•--. :,••.:1-1.,,'*f,-- -4 k ,4t:, it..•:,..".. io::!.;',.:.'''-':::•*--":', ' ii•-,",,,-1•.:-•L:b A-•i. , -• t t t' -' - .,•,.jki..-4a.-:,.;,-44,4 4..,--,v-rib,•;•,s•',.• , /: ,,,•• j ir -,..,-. it' '' 'I.,, 1:i.' .4,-•,'' • 1.,.•' ..,',...'..,v.:1;•- ••'1, :elr;it-,.., rt.,.•-1.,'"--. ,-;. . t.-.44itt-., t• t; ."..7: •"".:,''.-,,-.1" ''? P.' ,:er, ,,. I. . ' '4'-'*I.::: ..-,..' ; 4 ' '',,r,....;', .•'.. . 1,'-',- • '•. - ;' '^.. . „ . cifir...14.„ , '..;,'''..it..' '1'.i.3.•.:. • • •' ., ,i,......i. ' 4. ''' . , - - - ..,...Ni,...,-- f, -42-:'-.4111:....' ‘,....- -',:;',!'t.A1',I. '- -.,-- • __ -.N...,' 3- ' '''Iggir I . ., 1 '''i ' '''1, ...,..7;',-."Iiii-' 1., •.!..,...,,,,.:4:,',1;','`'',\ -... ' - "1,',4„,■..-'..-, r .„...". . ....... ..,.. , ....44, . . 4. .,„:„.... -...-N, ,. ;:'"'.,, •:..,...',-,-.•......1:::''',,.:-.40...,-,' ...? ,t Iii'Cr .... .--,..-- ,..:?' '..,4#A.:.---r--' . _ ,., ..„_, ..i..-N..,....... ir.. - -- - -' ‘' ' --411f . ..T.'...,,,..- "C'.-7'." - . ..‘* ;r:41- 971* ',,_. ,, t. ---> '* ...... .. •Y ' ........-. . .":..1 s.,"' ''''''.].: .C;,:::: 14, 4‘.1i'". . . , , ...,. , • ...:•-vat.;:...,'=-5-.,..,,,i"N. ,....--, - _-,..,:., •: .-..... ..,.:,,,...,,,'*,.. ... , -- ' ---_,-: ,..,,,,..„..'--;•-47?...,, ''If ft* 4` :•,, '''.' -''.''''s-'''. ''''''' - .- 7,1%,".'.,;...174:,*-7'''''' ''..it,',,,--...4.22s‘-..1 ''''' . -5, , ..•V 1 7.'1. ' ...;.s.,-,74--;- . ‘iy!‘-,(7.0x,T:t5s,•-1;'‘,..,'::•,.'..-•,--,..,i. , .0 •, 1 -IV r• ?'-::•!.'••••,tr-rj . -•:::•:.Z2,-,4•-•:: , ..,' '.:,47: ' KI,... ,s:,. i .. .• , u, 1 .-:,-.: •.f.i. ,..z-4'• ' ,-f-s.0,-„: _-,,„ s.,; ,!:.• -•• •,,,,‘.. 1 , ;-r•-';; : -,.. ,,,,_::!?-7,•-g-.-4-z.. ,,-..,-/ ;,„_".i'tir,.....f-,1.-.,,:::-. i -0 - • ' HM '' '''.■411.-. .' ' '' ' ..14 ?'',■. 'To alf _ ,.., . ,,,,,,N,,,---- tit .,...j4. :,-.-='- lt ;:.•-.--r.:.. ,Il 416,4" ....4;:f),.4•& i g...-.‘.-•-1:--f3. -.:;,• ,., 1 -- r ! .:.::;.-- -s- .-. .- .- .4 _ I 1', ,...:.:....,-,44,4,4^'%...44. . ..• . itift. . ) - . .. ... ,.., . ... , ...--.. 4II .c. A ■7■,.., . a,, .... -- • . ....;- ' 1 , - , ., -.'-,-..---_:'-- .• id:..4, . • t ' ' . il •'• -''-' '..•.:,,i' ''''''.A ' ' ,...':- ' N. 1 ' .• -,. ±..., .. _ ,... , i - tt 1"71 - . .- • ... '4t. i ' 111 ° '' ..., '4?-fr.;..:.- . ' • ., , . . . . 4. • -,.>- .: : • . _ i.:- 1.4...:i -' . .... , •,,,-- ,, . . "..,-,'..- . . , .,.....'-',,........:• - ,.-'.:44,...,.. .. - ., - -: ...... i I 1 - . : _71 ' . . • • . - • • .1 ,.P..17';A., •-. • i • - ' ' i, , ... .1.• X lc ... A. - .. ■ , ,...._. .. , ,- ..-f. ... -'• -. I.,: :-, `%.--:', •..-r. . - ,! . . , „.„.„.............. ......i.thi.ii.: ..!. . ..el.:`:-' . _ ' '' '..: .4.4 1 $ ---. . v -• ' . ' ,,", 4.:41 ,,r,...• "),, 7.- -. s•-•€,.......a, tw. .s. "- ...ti . - .. .: •• ,, , .' '• ._\ - "..;r0p.-.: . _ . . . • .... \ ,...;lit• ' . s.-... i 1 "-t \ \ . - . . , ,...__,.. \. I- t ..) ,t+ ,,,,Ai°,•‘:. ' _;"-,,. „ .. 3 ,''' f,,•`;`,1V-7'-. ',i , , , 16 1 I Li 1 O ;t* 4!.**17t,_,i ._, 2 t lgs„;...„.,E 3, j+x ,+ Cat ,:.. . i'll.i I:, Ti,.-.---.4,„...*4. d* a _ i a �y 'q • a k. ;f ,Y fi s \ L:t 1%7 4 _�": i •. ."t'+ ..#6.. �. ,� #%ti . i Ala#,,, ff. .t{ :-tls nF tit \. 0 it #:.kth, 1 1 o L 'ti If"` t 's ar s5'•I', ,% I ' ;4„,'. ..IW1,1111,141. IP' 1. 5 k \ �'\ _ �� 11'4 �' �•s i h 1 .r x , r tt4 . � ' , f w �• P / sir LF j • • t S i { f '*A es _F i• Jilt •• +� s .".44iiitel„ „, 't,i .v4"." /4,, , / ill 1 . t.. eV. ., , , it , .y ! - e6d esv f v ' ®iv t' At M ',.:..:71 . R f 5 • . ,,.. .. .. 16 1 1 B 10 . , , .. .... . . 10.4. .. 14 ...„.:4.. •„ .„. ok ,:,• #.•,t,,tt' i... , , -an' •'_`'.... i•,.:;;.-.....,, .4 . '',:;,?., '111, ."'• ,-•''.*"J"..A.•<-4,11.:,24:,;:'-- '. ' ■ • . ' •_ . . . .fr.;..e. . ' . ...' .. ,' - •.•';:.54.;',"N-f-..,-::':•' ••' ' -- 1 ; ./ ,.,•04:,... ',,,, .,.-'.-Ii..cs-V7,1.4iz-•.:t.,•••"2'-' - ' •- •• •-- i i • ''"- ee-'-' -.4,22,2..4.77.--9°t 1.'rv-7•-'t-*(:i7trl'S1'-'.•_'.• ----••••••' . •• ' -' -' • - ' 0,,''`.4,• s":•:is•5‘-r-Y.I.i.......i:',-- -r.•• i. - . . _ , ■ '-` \ :s,..x.**,-.4".%.- -•.. --...., •iy.fii..4.,%A.....4-,;-.4„:„1:,15.4.,•••,-..r,. • ; ..: . • ; .'""-::: ...;"._..,.' •""-:ki,•*- ,;;;:::144•5 ".. 4/„.•,,..•.- ...4.•' • .-t..,. .-i,."-rs.,ose-...7...1.7:" •.ty !•,-••: . _ - „,,I.-,-,..yap, ,••'",,,,........... . - ,t`,-.N-. ', •:','•' 07- - -:. kris I•••47-41.1.....-41". :•.'L,,.. '':-....it,' '• -.'-'''--...-',..,_....-*EfU--,,,:'•':-,*`---'n '. :,sst, . .. 4.,..,,,.. .i.z.R. ..,.... •,, --,. -..1.,m.40,;,,,,,,,,:s...7?,,,-1,,,,- :0,1 • ' '. -:--,.. .. ''• --'- ''''----Y--,,,,, .:12 -4''' ',, _ \ 4.21// •: A,. •ts. ,. ,, • ..-z. . --.4 -••-' .„,--1.: 2.4,.:4w...- - ,4... .... --_ -_-_ -..., -. -;.......--.<, ‘:-. .,, -.-- , . --\,Z,,:, -- -• ',:• !'". .•,S ••,'.'• ' . . is.••n 3 a.1 ,t ek• -, ;i i 1119611*WI'n2 :ti.01.4 ix 4-kr•,...:„ ••-••'''' '''1 ..- 1:,•.,_-:•,;._ -144L'..:.•1-.-- .;..--...1. --. .1,---NA.,..--‘ -.1-,11.••‘ '..-,.. ....,--e."•,,,,/ i ' ' 1 -1 1-:.• ''''' .`I= 1.t•=i;s1falpna• (1) - 'toef;.-.,•4. , . • -:--- *-7.-..4-_,,:: -.)-,: ..,;,.. .. ,‘ .----- , - , --,:. Natzi4 2 :a 1 t r•r:/1 P. R PI ',0-14%-4,,Vitif.."11:4;,•••7/,..•44w. .--: •",,,._ ,:-,e,.4. .-.4.-.,...-- g, .,,,,4.a....,n .,;,1?-... •Akt.,,. •.. - .,-k,,'„,,',....• -;.:- .• -'''''"-R.'•.-'''',..t--,21'..,...- --- . '• •"4.4,`•• N " 0 a,'13;,i 2 t' i-.3.„ • . • • - -7, --to: ' it's.4.,,. . , s....,-N-.,--`,.. (2 ,,..-....,-",e,7!,t, , - ,-,,,...,..?..".44,1,:.... .. - , _:_,. . --.:-.. .... • , . .. ,f Vo..+ .• .,-. -.--T,-.„7.-7.1t3 i;=-.gtil-;0.24,4- ;,..,. ..*--.-, -,...,.. _. , ,-., ,....,r. --t2at•t"i$7.2-itt•••••`•il-'..,,t t: -..: ...,....'• -•.' -1 -lo•-•••---•• •••••vis_ - .."`t, ••i. ..4•••., ,i . ••AtZ •NaZt441141 . ,7 Arn ,.. , • ---,..r - i:• :. -•"•:••-r,--; .-.- .'--,,,i*L- _,.1.,1_, ,.,.-,, , '...,', :-----, .- ••,•,. ....,--=---- . .. - -•.hr-4-7-----.— :=.1.,,'.—,-.s. .141.4:44.;, , 1 < " k•N;777-'''0 VI,...:1! .......,..,v.4.:;'O; • “.1;;..;'.--e i'- -.' V i!.... • • . ii,t,,, , rlip:..741.- -i: -- ..v.-:..:.‘,..,-1-4a,-... 4„r..., ,Y - vizir • - - . 10,44,--.43 ,--A- ,,,,ts, te.,w„,,,-, 4.,, . , ,,-t., U.-. ',.:-J,F.Ti ii:- '..,..1 0,1-:-.-- - - - ' '-• ' ., - .„-rtA-.t-i=rrvrN1- , '..- ---.„ 4-,-1,-AG= :- ,„ - 'r-W-._=: ,--. -...-;-7.—; 7--?'"'■ •.-- ' ..-..- -.-='•.,=...- ---=-.., ',... 2 ›....,..',....\., ',., •-',1i, ..„,-,..,...., .,,..._;7,...,7_........- .5...:_-_•-•_-- ...,•, ..v-...,..t.-5.t4.4....k It =-_. = s.' ' •"•-•.". 4\.,,,,... ...,.\■,--:-.,,,,-- *-"Ts*. ...,-- - -•-. • ....". -..., •iti ,'I.V.,2 ;;•, E•-, -1V,tx"ei•::"t-'4'•••*,:),-A.022.,••!A. , '4:', • ' .."-• ,J, ,,--,,,...---5:.,J..„.::..';',„ "',."-. `'''-'''...2.•‘.\''....., ---i'-_..... t--,..;„--.•:: ;7-ca.?,•, ....,..._..,__ r • k'.' , a'• ' '+ - 4.1 ' .''' 'rt`,;'4"":''4'`'''' 'I'^-442'-r.A..'..'"-•- ''"•-•'."--..%,-;* •'AS- ! k ,,,„ar.,.,...,,„,„....„.. .._.,.. . ....,, , . ... • ....„._ ,..,...,:ti,ic...''',.,7-:-_-, '`-'=',',F.:5- :,-V!'"-` ....,--•••- -.. , 1, / --. 14,.• ' / '''=7,-="'''''• ....-** 4- )17:j T. ,.-.:::..•' ,TIN 'cani,:-:.til I's s i..• ;,,,',17'.4".‘4§-4,„2.7.1`,7 ' .4,--.•11'1'.'.--4,!..,,,,,,••••2•-.-....--..A.,,, - ..--f; m...-..dt-j : :.-'::-:,:•:-.5.,?,,,,,-,....,:":::;,:f,:;-:-...",-1 ...:,)1,`../i, ,to . - --`--".-1,ii ,-,I'N. '*). - :••••:. -- -.."' --..- \ - - ,f..------,-...--.-,,,,., • ., ., •A - 0 ,• 104 FOC<WM e "'• '-.1'.:,:,;.'"'••••,f7.fj.,,•••';'- ',..4*.': 4,,t' '"'-'. • ---,,„....-.- „.,......kt,,,,,., .. , , , —_-_--,-.75....,4,-, •.••,-.., , , ,„;,/,-.;, ,\, , •-=•,,.., 1,-Nzuto.s,la .,.A..4;•„?:„.--:;,„;-;.,•-4,i--,,,•?..-..„,,,•4•Q.: -. ••• „..„-tim.„-tf-,,,,s-k- ....."-,4•.›,-. •-,...,•,-,,,,,. ,••• N.a,N.,--__:.-.._-:,...... .• 4,„-,4, ...„-,..,,it.„,,,w; _ „L.- • t:$ '' ". NitifELMN *,,,e,,,,W,E.„..:',T.,:.,,;s,,!'',,..,-t.',7.:•-„,,lifiXst..!------ '''.',, -_ -„Nik. 1...a;.:•-•:*.-.':-•).'...''',i' ."4.'k ..5".;•,-,.."744,',' Pi"' .' .L' . "' ".. r .` ' it Sei.Witt '-',.'1".A.‘4....44 "<r-C,I.4e.....,7'.... ..0'.1:4■■•-;:',...., ..'N',t..7, •?',.. -,....-1.z-..,::•.,.!...'..t'',i .:,...?%,■ %\.\:.-..-7......,, ',,,I -,7 et/, .,,Z.,,,, , • %F.", , ' .....'V.:',..„ "4",:•.",:■!;.;(!...i.,,.-....'W'....,**---',...77''''-' 1"'... '''' ''''s :,.;". ....'':'''..,..s: ,,i*:::::',,',....,,,...,,,'' .- ,--''el: , ,./7 4.1V.'' s% ''. , 2 - .-4.,7;...- al ./(9.N••'N'a.:t'i?•;4. 4;:?.4-iii'L--:'''2,"-,,',..',-7..s•••••-•&•■ ' •'-''-•'* ,:N•''■&•,•- -,,\•''' 2''''4 ',‘''''0 •'-':--'31';•1.--•?..-2"' .••.-•-'-',,, •' • ,-' le- - 'il:i'f 7•4:::;:44•1-441-•••;4 7:..",„A-.....":"V.P---.--- --.: -,-.7. ...... -•••••-•'-',1_4,..---1 --, •••,,,st A,::t 'Oj,, - ''''' .4,- ' -4,,ar`TA'iatl.'n**114,2Lit ijr0-•.''' - -- -... .- ..:;57%.."'". ...i..'IPLw-..----. ....4. ,J,IT ..1 (1.1) ' '"; );• WZ....„,-74 5:1 Bu--.7 .. ...,,,;;,,?..,."_,f,4.P,,,,,2,,,,,!•;,•,..;',.-i,,,,,,c,,..--...t1 -.2------Jmi ....._ •-.:-.;.:4t--7":24--,--- -- ....-?-_-,.:-. ..ft2.17: ." 'i.,,c9'... - _ ' • ''''' • ' TIVIVA71 i.42,i,:tc,,i,42k44;k-t'l. "..-,=- -.-:-.- --.-,. - ..-:•.'■----:";•" ''- ',..-',3-:7:- ..."'A:4'rs'''''..-.-_----• ,..,;'-'-- _. 3.,if, -Te="-t-222F E. :..t..--ix.41%.4..i.i,..--- -A .t.:-.:. . ---- --_,,---...-ist-,..-.. ....-...: --,:-:. .44.:' 7•4_. :; 1.,..-e-`4,- `,..---.7,,. .: ,r'r-, Cami ' .1.:',-.1, _.■,_,..,,,,,, ,ri 7---.14eztfAis,Vpril-,----•‘-xlp.---__ . _ .,:z.._;.."--.f....1=i-'•;..--..,...-_,;.•:.. .,-„„:",,,t-„,•- •.07;..,;-42,,,,,.,:-;±,%.1.'•'A'<::'-;',,! -I "'D A' :Ikit•... -01.&i•sd----t"- --- , '..t.:+ti/ . ! ••• • •-' 0 ...-7'7.• ' ,••.2, ,,,T.:-P-::••,••••41,111__ _____. - ., ., .••-•- ---•"•-=-:'"-t'• • , ::P?• . ' ••• • 7.: ',.., '. 1T ir- ---- ' /,-,-1'.-k,, • .......,.., •' P . . ..,.. . „.„- . _ i 1 '': ,•i s ,44"-- " ., ...._._... ,,,,fel,,,y....,,k-.,.‘4.-,... t1 \ .,.■,•.:.V...y...,..:7=-7:: .:.4 • .. Z.- ,•ti.2-'"',I 1''';* ''\ '''...-- -- - . ->. , ... r m "--, i,•",-;:*"-f,tic.,.-.-'''":1.4r.i"...4, -.-- 11111:3t 0 , ,-,,-,•-, 7.-- ' • '''-'‘•.;'Z'• . '''‘k ■.--..5"'' < ,•-i'vie..tk_.•••...-‘.4.",s-4-.it,''''' --"' -7-t•s-- • -..-3-;1:‘. ,•'''-' -UAW -: •,•Xi::',.5-14".....s,•,•-":•-•;":;•...- - - ••••••=-- • •••- . •••• . -......_ .-..., - 0. ••‘•....,,#.--.04. --,, 4. "" --, ,.- . .... -•-....„-- it ,,..... . •■,\ s .."... ',-, \',.''.''s- 1:14,*- '-:1 • • jJ .t.:'''''iit''''''''''''''"- :. I" - ''`'`-..."7 - . ---."- . -- .. ,_''.......t,,,..7"--, " ' •-''s 1%'‘. •;,,' , CD $.44 n. • . • ' .4",t...1,7:4v'll■ '34.: ".. vv.,. .. .. _ ui.uP.....,. ..-a: i'"' . . 4, u - ' A gi --1,:-t., „,,,,t-. ...-, w:n.1:4--. . - ----.: E , ..,,,,, . ,.. ,..,.. ...._ „.., .,,,---,,,,,,... -. P3*- ...,Ttlu.'‘.4,4,T -T.-' i :4- :.,iy..,T ,,,•,, )') -, •-•ma .3N.1 u* 4/ ' C' ) ,..., . ' "--_,T,,s- -•--'' -,./. ;i 14,•.44 1.-.,„..., .. , . . . (1) , 00,11, • _.4-,....pqL3 . . - _ -s ...'• '7.1e,,4"1/./.6 ;•?., • '. NN't` k• IX,4,1.. • ''' •'• ..---' • pi i's.:-,4*.i..ilr.' „"-7. 4-4 ' ..... -....'Ls .......• ..•:".."- . _ -• -.--: -''-' l'i-T.11.;-•:',''. -- 1 .4''‘• '''s 1 41/' f.- -"--':"..7.--l'''' ifq.;'-'2Y-4:•'•":31;X1', ..2k- P1.40P'.' ,::2 -• •'•11 -.:7.••_1'p:st-__..-,,..,,,:: •-; /(1,- •„"•.' -..-.•-.4;;.:----',', .7,'"i • „,,:., „,,,2- -E -.:::.' 41.,•pf5.34 :. ,..t..-s -i,1,;:.:; • .41..S.• •-•-, s.: ,. --"--' "" •" /i Leikltilkk: ›i..,1- Ci)(n + 1:,. 't••*, ,it _____" -19› A:4.r ..tig• a's.,..,;• -1115P.'`:.2 • - ' ! ' " • - i • ." ,.... "--.,iii5i-.14147.'• •••.'","--... -1 4'''''''''''''' "*1.:7;`•• 4- 11417:1'..:13.*'`.CNI, •W F •';.;'' ' 's, ''- ' *- ;„,;-.4....47. 14'.""itk,,,4 -- ',,It, i :'. ",4, .1'flii•2''' ''•!-';',, :' lk,i,..• it.c,.';';a:t4tit'llk.Up: 4' '`... •' . ' ' ' • .- .,,./.,„...::,... - „,..,,,._ ....,,,...,....:,.„,,,...„........„. .. • ,.. , : • _ .. I, I ..;.-A0, -,:i.k."*...-T''' 4' ,',-..Ni.4-Nlz-!,4:4-'..'Irecl.-1. ' ' • .t... t.*:.- ..... f: :.. %4Z.` ,VV..-' -"i''' • `•-fr. .?•.,•,.kil:,,oyf,:-;::::•;*. t-- ;:i::':,,?;;;*•*;:.--g;-:14:111:d....---'.-- '-.4.te.:-:.7' 4t - ,;„_. j? ''•,,••.' v ,1/4_. J.2,‘,.,\•*;,,,*.,)¢.. ; , i. • ''' .,,4.40.1=-' -.,:7„.,,..,y,,,7,..,-,4,-.:,.,.,f,-.2,..4... ,..:::4-4,.. - .. .4., .. ..„.„ -- 'f V44ii''• ' 11 ' , J, ..-,:s.". I ,2 % . -,i,-.•;,,,...,,,,A .,....-4,,,. ., .• •-. .d-%,...,..--, ..::-.- -'" - - .-.."'., • . -'-;. .•.--, .. g 6, 1 1 . -.-- . • •....r. 40;.-.-- .__ J . Itipab.A.,40likt '... '-. ...fil,4k. •-,_ A :..„_ .... -,..,6,- ,.,..4.-...,....-4. , . „„,, _. ,.. 2.-. /...) iii 4.: '-.l' 1..'.:.•'...."...,;•.:.' , WA., •I., Aft: -..f.4/4 p :1•"TI?.-1.7i14:11.. ;Z, A 7.-; ,-,, . ', 10°_.'a•r• ; ' • - . '4 - 4, -• „.i. • .. 1. , I ' ..,...1.-.1 ,„,Air'. ,P.; ! /• • •. A F Ilk I. '0, '• ^ ?..,t,\, ,.1.-; gy..- • .' ti. C \ • ''' ;'• t't.'In:. •4I,::;•-f'?.' • '...: t, , l• ,,,y-. , - .;k ';.%*fl lt..sr * 1 .1.--", ,, . 1.,„...„7 ''.. ....•1,2-,.; : S-..7 t- - k. •• .. . ••..).' ••-•- „•_. ,"'sx•ty,',. '4. , .r ,ie 7. , . . . • - '''..1,- ' ' -I.4' . "•'4„._ it- 7 .4.:-_,...* *tip- . it -" "•- '' .. :,._ "!.- . . r.0+,"-- 16 1 1 Proposed Improvements u Q ti : + r1t' t„ /,..- 1 *h YL ! ` fir' vo i\? .'R. I,/ / a;° lt, �gi)• -4.± tip t. - � '4d1 I• f 1 , �' .I {� a. Yt . _`yam - ,i„,#. ,fit sl„kit ,,\\•��}�� qi”�t f,.' ∎T - �j it,' , ' �� _ ,.su � tbi� ',4 v �,tl��q 4f ;,;„....-,,p.: 5 ,,�1 I iii :a•y ,. � • . .. { I /1101' 11 �• • I C � s Y t' 1\•jlit • ‘Iir -:'':..'''.8;...,r `•21.341-NW4'-•:".14:4;;,Vif•;1'1).407°F.T4 el.-:‘;;;*.,..,;,.f,..'. '',/,":'..":2.:ic,-*4,,,,..i...,-;:::,-...',•.ie,-. .,..r.,, .-::,. ,,,..-,.. ..c,.._‘00,..,,,,-.--;..f. ',.-. .-..,-. f C ° �': $ :t4.1"t '� � � a ` t aL �' ff: 4J5-T, < 4 N r s r�: °G 0 s7 "'`•• * 7iBJBPl� ®TiElTC + € t, " tR a � ,,,t.:,. Y c 4 it ,s & 7» 3S ` an t v'!fig ae+� - 4 r M. P . a - ®`e 4,-"---`...:•'' .. -'r t� tt-r i __, n-t '7 n ' , . - a•` rt Existing Conditions �f\1 r 1,l r 1, v ,t c fr-. ,,i. \ ( \ 1 , a �l. f i • •• t + \t 1 1f 11' 1 Ir'' t E l\ . l� R • ° cef'� 1a ? � tf ,,y_ J/ �'� 1 lip F .l 1 `/ %4:,...Y ;4: /, `a - \` �� '1 T � r r, i �I" t 4r t t (Rpf 1 M f t \ yh ~t + •{(t ., 1 11 `� t �..•41 ii 1111Mik : .z.,,:_ .,-g",. NT,.,. ,,,,..m...::' .,7! ---..ve•-• .5„..., ..../...prAlkilgth: 4.:,•I•,.1. ..„.i„,,,,,,!-•,-:,,.. ,4.:„ , . . �4 ► 'w j t 11.i �t.t i \ 4 f' • s , ♦ y ° , i'' , �: — y t.!,„-i f p,�/ / /� t "y -1 rc ii.} \1 s " ` =j• /SK:*il'1,;,:/,..,_*,•,=,..`'*"....iWw ' '',''',/i *"tok,;.•—, *. i 7i7:::*'-:47.f.ii *al i L "• •A r - B1 i,,.•,, " °f ,rte 1- • � - -464.4.0111401.161.1 RECEIVED SEP 1 3 2010 1.6 11 Fiala ~~ Halas Henning July 12, 2010 CoY'e / : Co'~ttl t.. / 811 / Board of County commIsSiOner!! MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CONSERVATION COLLIER LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, July 12, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Bill Poteet VICE CHAIRMAN: Michael Delate Tony Pires (Excused) Jeffrey Curl Jeremy Sterk Thomas Sobczak Annisa Karim Clarence Tears Lauren Barber ALSO PRESENT: Alexandra Sulecki, Conservation Collier Coordinator Jennifer White, Assistant County Attorney Cindy Erb, Real Property Management Melissa Hennig, Prin. Env. Spec., Program Manager Misc. Corres: l C~;Jies tJ: 16Jl~Jll July 12,2010 I. Roll Call Chairman Poteet called the meeting to order at 9:03AM. Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. II. Approval of Agenda Mr. Delate mnved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously 7-0. lIT. Approval of June 14, 2010 minutes Mr. Curl moved to approve the minutes of the June 14, 2010 meeting subject to the following change: Page 4, New Business, paragraph 1, line 2 - from "Dr. Starnes..." to "Judge Starnes.., " Second by Mr. Delate. Carried unanimously 7-0. Mr. Sobczak arrived at 9:05am IV. County Att!lrney Sunshine Law Presentation Scott Teach, Deputy County Attorney presented the following slideshows: . "Government in the Sunshine" - Office of the County Attorney. Jeffery A. Klatzkow, County Attorney . "P;,blic Records "- Office ofthe County Attorney, Jeffery A. Klatzkow. ':ounty Attorney . Ethics Laws - County Attorney Office, Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attornev , - The presentation addressed both State and County requirements in these areas. If you have any questions on the presentation or any subject related to them including but not limited to potential ethics violations, conflicts of interest in voting. Committee member maintenance of public records, etc. contact your Staff Liaison or the County Attorney's Office. Any members who determine they have a conflict of interest with an item should contact Staff for form 8B and submit it as required. Item VI.A - Yew Business s- Gopher Tortoise Relocation - public/private was taken up before ifew V A. Gopher .';r i-toise relocation - public/private Alex Sub~ki provided the following documents for review: . "Public Meeting to discuss Gopher Tortoise Relocation onto Conservation Collier Lands" . "Public Jvfeeting Summary Notes - (Gopher Tortoise Relocation ~- June /7, 2010") She noted the Committee had recommended a Gopher Tortoise Preserve be established at Caracara Preserve and to pursue the necessary permits. The Board 2 i. ' 16J 18 1.1 July 12, 2010 of County Commissioners approved the proposal and Staff expects the permits to be issued shortly, Staff is seeking direction on whether to allow the relocation of the Tortoises from both public and private sources. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conserv:ltion Commission indicated the County may accept Tortoises from either source, A public meeting was held on the issue on June 17, 2010. Tcra '-1C'cks of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) was available via teleconference to answer Committee questions noting: . tfl~ FFWCC approved a new Gopher Tortoise Management Plan in 2007 and new guidelines in 2009. The Tortoises may be relocated on-site or off site, It they are relocated off site they must be relocated to a permanent recipient site. For off-site relocation, there are long term protected sites and short term protected sites. The long term site must be at least 40 acres in size, with a long term perpetual FFWCC conservation easement. The short term site must be at least 25 acres with a long term easement or some form of lesser FFWCC easement. There is an unprotected option with site being at least 25 acres with no requirement of an FFWCC conservation easement. FFWCC has no restrictions on the sources of the Tortoises, ;t-ere are no approved sites within Collier County. Si.tes over 40 acres in size, without FFWCC easements are considered a ';~~ort term recipient sites." Tortoises are required to be relocated within a range of 100 miles north :md south of the source and as far east as the Atlantic Ocean and west to the Gulf of Mexico (unless for research purposes.) TIle majority of the relocated Tortoises to date have been from private sources. The County may charge fees for receiving the Tortoises and the funds must be dedicated to management of the site. The County would not be required to accept Tortoises from sources outside the County, The relocated Tortoises must be placed in an enclosed area and monitored by the County for 6 months to a year. Ongoing annual monitoring is required at the expense of the source providing the Tortoise, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . j it' Alex Su~~dd noted there is approximately $70,000 of up front costs (mowing, restoratiolr~ fencing and permitting and monitoring) for the County to establish the recipient site. For private source Tortoises, the full range of management costs would b~. charged, with fees greater than those charged for public sources, For 3 \ 1<",-\1 16 11B~1 July 12,2010 the public sources, only the range of management costs above and beyond nonnal County management would be charged. Sneakers Chris Stephens, Johnson Engineering, County Consultant for the project, addressed the Committee noting the initial monitoring consists of inspecting the enclosures and determining adequate foraging areas exist at a cost of approximately $500. The $28,600 cost for permitting and monitoring identified in the document provided by Staff ("Pubic Meeting to discuss Gopher Tortoise Relocation O/lto Conservation Collier Lands") is related to monitoring areas for the permit application (groundwater levels, etc.), not the relocated Tortoises, The density requirements are 2 - 4 Tortoises per acre, depending on the site. Discussion occurred noting the Tortoises are susceptible to diseases, which is another aspect of monitoring, Tera :\1ceks noted once a Tortoise is accepted by the recipient, it becomes property of the recipient, and their financial responsibility for long term care. The County is may deny the proposed relocation of any Tortoise. Jessica Stubbs. Conservancy of Southwest Florida noted the Conservancy supports the efforts to establish the area as a Gopher Tortoise Preserve for public sources only. Accepting private source Tortoises may provide disincentives for developers to provide on-site preserves creating a net loss of habitat. If the County allows them to be relocated to Caracara Preserve, the developers will be gaining a private financial benefit at taxpayer's expense. As approved by County voters, the goals of the Program do not include developing private source mitigation banks. Mr. Tca~~noted; . 'nle goal is to protect the Tortoises and they may be best suited on a public managed preserve as opposed to a Preserve managed by , rlevelopers and/or a homeowner association. . Public projects destroy habitat diminishing Gopher Tortoise habitat as well. . Allowing public and private sources of Tortoises could assist in establishing a population faster and promote lower monitoring/maintenance costs. Mr. Sterk suggested both public and private sources of Tortoises be allowed for the Preserve, but restrict their numbers (i.e. 60 percent private, 40 percent public.) Ms. Karim noted the cost for private sources charged by the County could be greater than public sources, however expressed concern private developments do not benetit the entire community, only those involved with the venture. Private entities. co~ld combine assets and develop their own source for relocating Gopher Tortoise~;'.' 4 16 I . B11 July 12, 20 I 0 Mr. Sterk moved to allow both public and private source Gopher Tortoises (at Caracara Preserve) with a limit on the number of Tortoise allowed from the each source. Said Policy to be reviewed in 12 months. Second by Mr. Delate. Discussion occurred on the definition of private and public sources. The Committee determined Public Sources are - any Public Entities within Collier County Public with projects. Private sources are - any Private Entities within Collier County with projects. Mr. Sterk amended the motion allow both public and private source Gopher Tortoises (at Caracara Preserve) for public sources (Any Public Entities with a project in Collier County) and private sources (Any Private Entities within Collier County.) The maximum percentage of Tortoises allowed to be relocated from Private sources beitrg 75 percent of the total population propoud. Said Policy to be reviewed in 12 months. Second by Mr. Delate. Mr. Sobczak recommended for a I year period, the sources of the Tortoises not be'limited in numbers. This would allow the Preserve to establish, generate revenue and assist in controlling management costs. The result would be preserving the Tortoises while being more economically efficient. Motion carried 6 "yes" - 2 "no." Mr. Sobczak and Ms. Karim voted "no." V. Old Business A. Real Property Management Update - A-list properties 1. Contracts a. Berman/Celsnak/Bennett (Unit 53) See below l\'ancv Pavton Preserve - closed on the Kirby and Murphy parcels on June 14, 2010." CosenthlQ - At the June 22,2010 Board of County Commissioners meeting, the Commission determined the County should not be responsible for the costs to "cleanup" the property. Based on this decision, Mr. Cosentino chose not to move forward and transfer the property to the County, Red Maple Swamp - Berman parcel closed on June 14,2010 - to date 60 parcels acquired totaling 171.97 acres. Cindy Erb presented the Executive Summary "Approve an Agreement for Sale and purchase for 2.73 acres within Red Maple Swamp Preserve multi parcel Project under the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program, at a cost not to exceed $23,200 (Berman/Be1l1zet/Celsnak Tr)" dated July 12, 2010 and related Purchas~ Agreement for approval by the Committee. ~ 1 : 5 16 11B IiI July 12,2010 Mr. Delate moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the Purchase Agreement for (Berman/Bennet/Celsnak Tr.) " Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously 8 - O. Winchester Head - Langkill - BCC approved the Agreement for Sale and Purchase on June 22, 2010; awaiting results of a "quiet title suit" on another Berman/Bennet/Celsnak Tr. parcel; George and Theresa Thompson did not accept the offer proposed by the County. The Outreach Subcommittee recommended forgoing new appraisals and sending out additional "offer letters" for the Unit 53 and Winchester Head projects. The offers will be based on the 2009 appraisals, She requested Committee direction on the concept. l~fr. Tea..s moved to direct Staff to send out the offer letters as proposed by Staff for the Vnit 53 and Winclrester Head projects. Second by Mr. Delate. Carried unanimflusly 8-0. B. Gordon Rlver Greenway Project Update - Jeff Curl Alex Su~ecki noted there was a meeting held on June 29, 2010 where a representative from the Florida Concrete and Products Association was available to discuss various materials which may be utilized in construction of the pathways on the Conservation Collier property in the Greenway, The following was highlighted: . The pathways materials need to be suitable for the intended users such as bicyclist, roller bladders, wheel chairs, etc. . Pervious concrete allows water to pass through it, however may not be suitable as it is rough in nature and requires maintenance vacuuming to ensure the voids in the material do not clog with silt. . Impervious concrete is smooth, but may not be suitable to due to the ~xpansion joints required. . Asphalt would be a more consistcnt surface with no expansion joints. VI. New Businf~': (continued) B. Property,Applications Status Alex Su\ecki presented the document "Conservation Collier - Applications - Ju(v 2010" nQting: . There have been no additions to the list since last month. . There has been no contact from Bank of Amcrica regarding the parcel between Panther Walk Preserve and Paskanik - The Committee requested Staff to take no action on the Paskanik parcel until September. . The deadline for Cycle 8 applications is August 15, 20 I 0, . An Acquisition List update will be provided at the September meeting in preparation for the property rankings required at the December meeting. 6 ~ .::o,~ 16 J 18 11 July 12,2010 . Staff is notifying landowners adjacent to properties proposed for acquisition to the Program in an attempt to ascertain if the landowners have any claims for untitled rights, easements for use or access, etc. VII. Outstanding Advisory Committee Member Program None VIII. Coordinator Communications Alex Sulecki: . Provided the "Pepper Ranch Preserve Quality Wildlife Management Hunt Program 2010 -2011 Brochure." It will be reviewed at the next meeting. . Displayed proposed sign panels for Freedom Park. . Reviewed changes to the Programs website. . Notified Committee members they are eligible for mileage re- imbursement if they travel more than 20 miles round trip to an Advisory Board meeting. Contact Staff for the necessary forms which are due back by the end of July. IX. Sub-Comm~ttee Meeting Reports A. Outreach - Tony Pires, Chair (Mr. Curl reported in Mr. Pires's absence) At the last meeting the Committee discussed the "offer letters" to be sent out to property owners in Winchester Head and Unit 53, website changes, and signage at Freedom Park. B. Lands Evaluation and Management - Mike Delate, Chair A meeting was held on June 28, 2010 where a 2nd draft of the Pepper Ranch Final Management Plan, Preserve Pamphlets and the Panther Walk Final Management Plan were discussed, C. Ordinance Policy and Procedures - Annisa Karim, Chair A meeting was held on June 28,2010. Nancy Olson of the Parks and Recreation was in attendance to discuss the proposed Conservation Collier Preserve Use Ordinance. The Ordinance may be combined with the Parks and Recreation Use Ordinance or adopted as a stand-alone Ordinance for Conservation Collier Preserves., The Land Development Code (LDC) amendment for off-site preserve requirerr"~:..:ts was approved by the BCC and is awaiting a decision from the Department of Community Affairs (DCA). Members revised a draft resolution describing the procedure for Conservation Collier to accept land donations pursuant to the LDC amendment and will wait for DCA approval to advance to the BCe. X. Chair Committee Member Comments None IX. Public General Comments 7 ,. .: .,' 16 118 11 July 12,20 I 0 None X. Staff Comments None There being no further business for the good ofthe County, the meeting was adjou rned by order of the chair at 11: 10A.M. Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee } ..~ / I~ ?///; t/L///[~/.r~/ --1 Bill Poteet, Chairn These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as presented j~'- or as amended \". -1. /'. / I <. f '''; - (:. 8 .-~ 16 ,I 1 B t 2 GOLF ESTATES BEAUTIFICATION M~TU ADVISORY COMMlnEE H ~'a 2885 Horseshoe Drive South H:na~ng Naples, FI 34104 Coyle Coletta RECE\VED SEP 2 () 2010 September16,2010 "";1[(1 c' county commissioners AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes: August 19,2010 V. Budget Report - Gloria Herrera VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM VII. Landscape Architecfs Report - McGee & Associates A. Maintenance Report B. Reuse Mixing Chamber - Warren Street C. Doral Bridge Project D. Lighting Study - Pebble Beach VIII. Transportation Operations Report-Darryl Richard A. Project Manager's Report B. Review of the To Do List IX. Housekeeping Item X. Committee Reports XI. Old Business XII. New Business A. Condolences - Bob Cole XIII. Public Comments XIV. Adjournment The next meeting is October 21, 2010 at 4:00 p.m. MISC, Corres: Growth Management Division - Construction & Maintenanc l ( 0 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Date: 0 Naples, FL 34104 item#lliJ:.(J ~ ~ '- . . 'J ~',-" 16 ill ~2 V' . GOLF ESTATES BEAUTIFICATION MSTU ADVISORY COMMlnEE 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FI 34104 August 19, 2010 Minutes I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Bob Slebodnik at 4:02 P.M. II. Attendance: Members: Robert Slebodnik, Tony Branco, Kathleen Dammert, David larson,Jenn~erTanner County: Darryl Richard-Project Manager, Michelle Amold-A TM Director, Pam lulich-landscape Operations Manager Others: Mike McGee-McGee & Associates, Jim Fritchey-ClM, Darlene lafferty-Juristaff III. Approval of Agenda Add: VII. E. Pinehurst Estates Signage . Kathleen Dammert moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by David Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. IV. Approval of Minutes: July 15, 2010 Change: Pg 2, VII. A, should read: Forest Hills (Median 12) "Tabebuian Kathleen Dammert moved to approve the July 15, 2010 minutes as amended. Second by David Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. V. Budget Report - Gloria Herrera Darryl Richard reviewed the following information: o Available Capital Outlay $89,688.18 - Budget Amendment is included (for Mixing Chamber Project) o Available Reserves $250,000.00 o Paid P.O.s $154,491.60 o Year ending 9/30/10 Preliminary Carry Forward Total is $452,300.00 per Mark Isackson (See attached To Do list) - Final Carry Forward will be established in February 2011 . 1 16jp~a12 . VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - elM Jim Fritchey reported the following: o Palm Tree trimming is underway o Additional Trees were Installed - (1) Royal Foxtail - (3) Tabebuia o (3) Trees are on order - (2) Trees require replacement due to shock (under warranty) - (1) Holly Tree o Landscaping was sprayed for the following conditions - Caterpillars - Chili Thrips - Scale - Turf Fungus Robert Slebodnik raised the following questions: o If the Rain Sensors were checked and are they functioning properly o If Soil samples were taken on the Xanadu (Cart Crossing) . Jim Fritchey responded: o The Rain Sensors were checked and are fully operational o Soil sample testing results were characteristic of Florida Soils o Tissue samples were taken and will be sent to the lab for nutrient and disease testing Darryl Richard noted: o Fungicide treatment is needed for Podocarpus (Doral Hedge) o Top dressing of Mulch is needed on Doral oRe-Mulching on Augusta and Forest Hills is required VII. Landscape Architecfs Report - McGee & Associates A. Maintenance Report Mike McGee reviewed the following items to address: US41 Entrvwav o Hanging Perotis Fronds require pruning (at the Sign Light Fixtures) o Royal Palm installation damaged Alamanda o Suggested removing small patch of Agapantha and install rows of Juniper o Missing Alamanda (outbound) require replacements . Median 1 o Sod replacement is needed (outbound) o Liriope Bed is full of weeds and requires Mulch 2 16 J 1 wJI2 . Median 3 o Replacement is required for !lex Tree Median 11. 12. 15. and 20 o Treatment of Torpedo Grass is needed to preclude severe cutback of the Bougainvillea Doral Circle o Previous Items were addressed (from July 15th meeting) o Sidewalk cleanup is needed o High Grassy area requires Mowing (between the Fence and Pod ocarp us ) B. Reuse Mixing Chamber - Warren Street Mike McGee reported the following: o Bid due date was extended due to required responses to Contactor questions Darryl Richard noted: o Bids are due by August 24th o Bids will go before the BCC September 28th . C. Doral Bridge Project Mike McGee presented the Construction Plans and Cost Estimate: (See attached) Construction Plans - Paae 3 o The length of the Concrete Structure (1/2 wall and Pilasters) is indicated o Stone veneer will be applied to Concrete Structure Cost Estimate Ust o Alternate is listed for Directional Bore (as needed) o Line Item 16 Temporary Barrier Wall was included - Subsequently it was determined the FDOT type Barriers will remain (by existing Contractor) - The existing Contractor needs direction (from Consultant) on Barrier placement Darryl Richard noted Line Item 16 may be converted to Removal of Barrier Walls . Mike McGee suggested coordinating with the existing Contractor to install Conduit prior to paving. Darryl Richard will submit the request to install Conduit and advise Mike McGee of the available options. Mike McGee clarified the length of the Conduit is approximately 40 ft. 3 16 118 12 . Tony Branco questioned utilizing Light Fixtures similar to the Country Club (Fixture infonnation was requested at the July 15th meeting.) Mike McGee replied pictures were received (Lighting Fixture) and noted the pedestal will require modification if the Country Club style of Lights was selected by the Committee. David Larson perceived a problem exists (Fixture or Electrical) as Lights were recently replaced and once more 2 out of 4 lights are inoperable. Tony Branco reported 3 light are inoperable on US41 (St. Andrews.) Darryl Richard reported the Electrical Contract expired and Bentley Electric is the new Contractor. He will notify Bentley Electric of the Lighting problems. Discussion continued on Committee preference for Light Fixtures. Darryl Richard noted a dissimilar style of Light is installed in the Doral Median versus the style on Hibiscus Bridge. David Larson stated the Light Fixture style on Hibiscus is aesthetically pleasing however he perceives consistency is the primary concern (for Dora!.) . After much discussion the Committee was in agreement that the Lights should be lower wattage Fixtures. Mike McGee suggested the following based on the Light Fixtures included in the proposed Plan: o Decrease Fixture height - 15.9 ft. o Maintain lower light level - 60 watts Jennifer Tanner moved to approve proceeding forward to Bid for completion of the Doral Bridge Project Second by Kathleen Dammert. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. . D. Lighting Study - Pebble Beach Mike McGee submitted the Final Draft and reviewed the following: (See attached) Table of Contents (Daae 2) o Fixture Plan layouts - Median and ROW o Roadway point of Light Level Analysis based on 55' spacing o Proposed Fixtures - LED - Cosmopolis o Links to Brochures and Manufacturer technical infonnation o Noted a CD will be available upon completion of the Lighting Study Darryl Richard stated Staff will mail the Lighting Study CD to the Committee 4 .~ 6 -<;- '"'" L -1 f cl 8'12 . Robert Slebodnik noted the Project will be presented at the Annual Civic Association meeting (February 2011.) Mike McGee responded a Power Point Presentation will be given utilizing the CD information. Enemv Use and Life Soan comoarison (oaoe 4) o Based on Manufacturer estimates o Earlier models of LED Fixtures may not give full level of light Evaluation Criteria (oaae 5) o Criteria is based on current Energy Consumption and Cost o Operational time is based on - 12 hours per day - 365 days per year o 5% System Power loss is factored in o Annual Energy consumption (54 Lamps in Median Layout) - Cosmopolis Lamp - $1,587.75 per year - LED - $1,711.85 per year . Estimated Annual "Electricn Based Svstem Budoet (oaoe 5-6) o Electricity - $2,000.00 o Maintenance (38 Poles) - $570.00 o Replacement Cost - $3,000.00 (potential vehicular damage) o Installation Cost - $10,000.00 o Total Estimate - $12,570.00 (includes installation) Estimated Annual "Solar' Based Svstem Budoet (oaoe 6) o Maintenance (57 Poles) - $855.00 - Battery evaluation will increase maintenance cost annually o Replacement Cost (potential vehicular damage) - 2 Single luminaries - $9.540.00 - 2 Double luminaries - $15,932.00 o Total Estimate - $29.327.00 (includes installation) Lavouts Considered- Median Double Fixture and ROW (oaoes 7-8) oLEO, Cosmopolis, and Solar Fixtures were compared in a similar layout o Median Layout - Fixture was setback 10 ft from Median tip (curb) - Distance between Intersection Fixtures exceeded 70 -72 ft. - Solar Fixture does not meet criteria (insufficient light for intersection 70 - 72 ft. distance) . 5 . Installed Liahtina Systems Opinion of Costs o Solar - $434,886.00 o Cosmopolis - $160,160.00 olEO - $172,832.00 16 j' 1 ~I 2 Mike McGee requested the Committee email any comments on the Lighting Study. Tony Branco gave a photo presentation on the proposed Fence at the Canal Crossing. After discussion the Committee agreed to install Plant Material to screen the area (green water pipe.) . E. Pinehurst Estates Signage Mike McGee suggested removing the Crown of Thorn and fill in the area with Mulch. After discussion the Committee concurred with the suggestions by Mike McGee as it was perceived the Crown of Thorn was blocking the Sign lettering. Robert Slebodnik requested ClM power wash the Pinehurst Estates Sign. VIII. Transportation Operations Report - Darryl Richard reviewed the following reports: (See attachments) A. Project Managers Report (L-48J Modification to Doral Circle Bridae o ROW Pennit is required o Anticipates an extensive review will be conducted B. Review of the To Do List Item 3 - Sidewalks on US41 at St. Andrews - ADA Compliance o FOOT is responsible for ADA Compliance o Funding is limited Statewide Robert Slebodnik questioned the steps that have been taken to resolve the ADA Non-Compliance issue. Darryl Richard gave the following infonnation: o Road and Bridge replaced the Asphalt o An email was sent to the FOOT Liaison requesting repairs on the ADA Non-Compliant Sidewalk o FOOT unofficial response - Funding is not available o A written response by the FOOT will be requested . 6 . . . IX. X. XI. XII. XIII. 16 j..'1 B[ 2 The Committee questioned if the Lely MSTU can Fund the Sidewalk Project or match Funds. After much discussion it was concluded the Sidewalk Project was not the responsibility of the Lely MSTU. Housekeeping Item-None Committee Reports-None Old Business-None New Business-None Public Comments-None There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned by the Chair at 5:44 P.M. Lely Golf Estates Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee <<:~/UL;h Robert Slebddnik, Chairman These minutes approved by the Committee on q - I b - I 0 as presented or amended A The next meeting is September 16,2010 at 4:00 p.m. Growth Management Division - Construction & Maintenance CC Transportation Building 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 7 16J1B12 Report for Lely MSTU Meeting date: September 16,2010 Lely MSTU Project Status (L-49) ACTIVE - Lighting Study (pebble Beach pilot study for lighting options) 08-19-10: McGee to provide additional detail related to 'on going operational cost' associated with lighting installation. 09-16-10: Concept to be presented to HOA at annual meeting. (L-48) ACTIVE - Modifications to Doral Circle Bridge (Committee Request for 'lighting on bridge') 08-19-10: McGee to provide 90-100% plans for final Committee review/approval prior to bidding. 09-16-10: Confirmation of placement of 'conduit' is pending from Haskins. Project is ready to bid after conduit placement is resolved. (L-47) ACTIVE - Installation of Mixing Chamber 08-19-10: Bid Due date for Bid # 10-5482R- "Lely MSTU Irrigation Reuse Water Source Renovation (MIXING CHAMBER PROJECT) has been extended to August 24, 2010. Staff anticipates BCC award on Sept. 28th 2010. Committee will review bids for award at next meeting on Sept. 16,2010. 09-16-10: Committee to review "Re-Bid" Award to Hannula (low bid) (L-34) _ ACTIVE - On Going - Ongoing Maintenance Contract: Commercial Land Maintenance; 7-27-09: Commercial Land Maintenance has trimmed all shrubs to required specification of "Cut to 18 inches and maintain at 24 inches"; Staff will inspect the project on a 'weekly basis'; Contractor is to provide service reports within 12 hours of completion of any contract service (ref: notification originally sent on 6-30-09 to CLM via em ail) (L-45) ACTIVE - On Going - McGee Annual LA Services - Landscape Architectural Services 08-19-10: McGee & Associates under contract per Committee approval. 1 16 11 8 ~2 September 16, 2010 Meeting Lely MSTU "To Do List" 1. Subrogation Recovery: a. Accident 859; damage amount: $515.00; Median #8 on St. Andrews Status: Landscape Repair Completed (CLM Estimate El0025l9); No Traffic Accident report found to match damage b. Accident # 947; Found on 01-15-10 on Forest Hills Blvd. Status: Estimate for $607.00 from Commercial Land approved for repairs. 2. Sidewalks on US 41 at St. Andrews - ADA Compliance: Status: Project has been brought to attention of FDOT for funding. Funding has not been allocated for project to address the ADA compliance issue. 3. CLM: have A & L Labratoris do analysis on Xanado at Augusta and Forest Hill. Existing plants have some yellowing. Status: CLM has sent sample to A & L Labs - results pending. 4. Electrical Lighting Related: Find out what type of 'lower' wattage bulb is available for Doral Circle. Residents are complaining that 'the lights are too bright' Status: PO for Bentley (under new contract) is being expedited. Diffuse bulb is recommended solution. 16 I l, 1 B 1 2 <Xl 0 N \D '" -0 N --0 > ... cu u ;,; -0 cu "' IX cu .2 '" .~ c: -0 0 ~ i:ii z 0 0 '" ~ ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ll> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \D 0 0 0 0 0 0 "" 0 q 0 \D 0 q q ~ 0 en ci ci ci ci .,.; "" "" ci en en <ri ci <ri .... ci ci en .... "" ci .... <ri Ll> Ll> Ll> ci c:i \D <Xl .... \D ~ ~ ~ '" '" \D "" N '" "" <Xl '" ~ '" '" 0 N 0 '" '" Ll> ~ 00 'ii "" <I> N N_ O \D \D <I> ... <I> \D ... "" \D ... ... <I> Ll> <I> ... ... ... <Xl L/l <I> ... ~ .. <I> Ni ... ai'i/).'V). <I> m rl'" i/). 1A- 1.1). .... <I> ui'iJ').i/). ",<I> '" ..; >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- ~ ... <I> ... <I> <I> <I> <I> <I> <I> In <I> <I> ... .!! ;, c c . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ll> 0 0 0 "" \D 0 0 Ll> 0 :%: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" '" <Xl 0 0 0 0 0 0 "" 0 q 0 ... 0 q q "'1 0 8 ci ci ci ci .,.; "" "" ci .... ci cci ci cci <ri ci ci ai .... "" ci <ri .... Ll> Ll> "" cci 1: \D <Xl .... <Xl ~ ~ ~ <I> <I> <I> ... \D .... ... <Xl Ll> ~ '" '" 0 <I> <I> \D '" ... N A- "" <I> N ... 0 \D \D <Xl Ll> ... "" ... ... <I> Ll> <I> ... '" L/l <I> ~ .. <I> Ni<l> ai'<(/\.if). ~'V).'V'). <I> <I> ...- <I> '" <I> <I> <I> C ... ... <I> <I> <I> ::) <I> <I> <Xl 0 L/l 0 0 Ll> Ll> 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 L/l 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 N L/l .... ~ 0 "'! L/l Ll> "" "" 0 0 0 <Xl ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 Ll> Ll> 0 <Xl 0 ... 0 '" 0 en ,..: ci \D <ri .... .... .... <ri cci ci ai .,.; "" .,.; ci <i ci cci .... ci <i .... .... .... ci ci ...; N 0 ~ ... \D ~ ~ .... "" N L/l Ll> '" Ll> "" <Xl ... '" <Xl Ll> 0 ... \D N "" '" en N <Xl <Xl_ ... <Xl ~ ~ N "" N '" '" \D <I> ~ 0 ... ~ '" 0 ... N "" ...- '" N 00 ~ .... <I> 0 ...- o<J'\.1J'). '" '" '" N'i/).1J). 1.I').mV').o(/\. u:i'1.f).i/). .... ... ~- ,..: '" ... <I> N '" '" '" '" '" '" In >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- c -a ~ '" '" ... 0 c 0:; .!! !: - 0 .fi c C II . <Xl 0 L/l 0 0 Ll> Ll> \D <Xl Ll> 0 0 N 0 L/l 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ... 0 0 "" ... Ill: E ~ 0 "" L/l Ll> "" "'! .... "" .... '" I': I': Ll! ~ ~ 0 Ll> Ll> 0 "! ... I': 0 I': q II :c ,..: g <ri ai .... .... ... .... "" .... ai .... \D .... ci <i ci cci .... ci Ll> .... Ll> .... .... \D U 11 N ~ Ll> \D ~ ~ <I> <I> <I> .... .... ~ N "" <Xl ... "" <Xl Ll> '" '" Ll> N '" ~ .. . N <Xl <Xl ... <Xl .... ~ ... .... "" '" .... 0 ... .... '" 0 ~ ... <Xl =' ~ ....'" 0'" ci-tn-iJ\. ~"'1J).1J). '" rri'1f).1J"). ui '" .... '" 0 ~ III <I> ... N <I> '" '" '" ~ .. <I> <I> a: C N 1il ::) ~ ~ III 6 II III .-4 =' III II t: a: .. .,.; v; to to to to to u.: u.: u.: to to to to to to to to to v; u.: u.: to v; to to C c ::) ...1 ...1 UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ ...1 ...1 ...1 UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ ...1 ...1 ...1 UJ ...1 UJ UJ 0 0:; III !!I ... ... ... .... ... ... ... 0 0 0 N N N N ... ... ... ... ... ... 0 0 '" ... .... L/l .. ~ 0 0 <Xl N 0 .: ... ... ... ::I .. c Ii; .. ~ a ~ "" 0 .!l UJ z z -' < a -' f- f= < l!) VI f- < UJ VI Z UJ U ::; VI v; ~ 0 ::; z < UJ Z UJ VI -' l!) ~ < ::> > ::; a ::; UJ a z <0 > ~ -' < f= < U :J: 0: ~ ~ > ~ a > u > :> IX 0: <0 UJ IX UJ UJ UJ UJ N UJ .... a ~ VI N f- ~ Z 0 ~ 0 !'!: ~ IX ... UJ VI U Z Z -' 0 IX a ~ VI < -' 0 a l!) a UJ -' l!) a f- 3: u- < 3: UJ ::> VI :J: <r UJ u z u UJ z ~ UJ UJ VI ... < Ll> 0 t: u a IX f- 3: a :J: VI l!) ::) ::) -' u VI -' :J: UJ ::) :::::; ~ UJ Z ~ ::::l Z VI -' <0 0 ~ f- UJ I- 9 -' < u- :i: ::) z UJ Z u ::> f- z < ~ IX < ::; < IX -' -0 U VI <0 3: UJ UJ u: a IX a t:i UJ > a a: t:i UJ ... u- c: UJ -0 ~ <0 ~ a UJ ... <r "' a: u 0 !!l "" -' !!l c: t:i a all c: UJ ~ UJ VI a ~ 0 I- a: 0 "' l!) >- u VI -' cu IX "" Z a: UJ Z :J: 0 < VI UJ <0 0 VI 0 3: ... 0 UJ VI 0 UJ a: < u z UJ UJ ~ 0 UJ <r <0 ~ a: < VI UJ < N 0 ~ UJ Z < U ~ UJ f- \D <0 ... < ... f- 0 UJ ... ... a f- u: t:i UJ 3: \D < a VI N VI c: ... u: a l!) ~ UJ VI a f- u l!) UJ "" 0 ... u ... :5 VI ::> VI cu cu 'iii :J: UJ l!) "" u UJ L/l U Z VI ::> VI l!) VI U UJ a u ~ u "' 0 Z Ll> U U ~ ::; >- f= VI IX 0: UJ u :5 >- IX c: c: ~ UJ :::; a: ~ .... f- a z Cl. cu cu .... cu u IX < -' X Z UJ -' f- ~ UJ X 0 ~ .;; u -' Z ::::l U < UJ a ::> "" UJ a z f= u 0 u a UJ 0 .~ "' OJ :; IX <r a a :J: u > > ... u > 0 UJ ::::l VI :> N 0 Cl. Z IX u -0 Cii Cl. u C U > 0 a N > Co VI a 0 f= VI Cl. a UJ < < > z x a: ... N UJ a a < )( .1!! :E 'c 0 u- VI Cl. >- ~ :J: N Cr. '" ~ .. z z UJ < IX 0 X < ~ 0 IX IX U U ~ UJ UJ 0 ... 0 f= a: ::::l -a UJ :::l < B g 'E Do :5 IX In UJ x UJ IX UJ 0 <Xl l!) ~ > lJ VI N UJ < Cl. l!) iii '0 c: 0 ?: "' 1: ~ a f- z UJ -' l!) 0 l!) l!) UJ Cl. ::::l -' ... 0 l!) > Cl. "' c: ~ -E u "' -' Z IX U J::. llC Cl. IX < a ... ... < z z l!) :J: -' UJ \3 ... N Z < < III ... ~ 0 -0 ~ cu u l!) -' 0 < 0 < z ... :5 '" c: ..,. c: ~ "' cu ~ u ~ f- UJ z 3: f= \D a \D ~ ~ :5 f= IX UJ ~ U ... :5 u ~ .. cu ~ '" cu VI u <r .!l 5 VI f- 0: < IX :J: IX l!) Z < U :J: Co Z <r > u x ::> III :ll E lio > c: J::. c: '" '" < UJ <- <i. UJ u- Z :J: a lJ Cl. u- UJ U ~ 0 ~ -0 -0 I I- U Vi VI l!) f- -' U UJ ::> :> u ... > ~ c: ~ u E <Xl ~ l!) z l!) iii u U f- ::> 5: 'E Ai u c: c: in a ~ UJ Z ::) <r cc VI cc in a VI IX VI X VI UJ in "- in VI cu '" U .D cu :::l cu ~ IX ::::l UJ a < ::) a UJ u ~ '" '" ~ !'!: <Xl <Xl ;... N .... ~ 0 UJ ... '" 0 -' .... N .... UJ 0 ~ ~ 0 :::l ~ E a; < 0 Cl. a Cl. IX ... U ... U f- VI UJ f- U > I- :::; VI -' VI ... N .... Ll> \D .... eo '" 0 ... N '" ~ Ll> \D .... eo '" 0 ... N "" .... Ll> \D .... ..; ... ... ... ..... ... ... ..... ... ... ... N N N N N N N N ... ~ "e "- 16 j 1 B,,~2 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 27, 2010 TO: Darryl Richard FROM: Ian Mitchell, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners RE: Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee As you know, we currently have 2 vacancies on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit an application for consideration. I have attached the applications received for your review as follows: Ms. Kathleen K. Dammert 333 Pinehurst Circle Naples, Florida 34113 Mr. Robert Slebodnik 32 Pebble Beach Blvd. Naples, Florida 34113 Mr. Gerald C. Powers 236 Pebble Beach Blvd. #408 Naples, Florida 34113 Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment of the advisory committee within the 41 day time-frame, and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Please include in your return memo the attendance records, for the last 2 years, of the applicants recommended for reappointment. Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at 252-8097. 1bank you for your attention to this matter. 1M Attachments 16 I . " 1 812 Mitchelllan ~rom: Wlent: To: Subject: KatDammert@aol.com Monday, August 23,20108:58 AM Mitchelllan New On-line Advisory Board Application Submitted Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (239)252-860() Application was received on: 8123120108:58:10 AM. Name: IKathleen K. Dammertj Home Phone: 1239-774-15441 Home Address: 1333 Pinehurst Circlq City: lNaple~ Zip Code: 1341131 Phone Numbers Fax: ~39-774-15441 Business: ~39-823-355q ~Mail Address: /KatDarnmertrm.aol.com/ Board I Committee Applied for: lLely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee! Category: !Not indicated/ Work Place: lselfEmploye~ How long have you lived in Collier County: [:ill Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the law? ~ !Not Indicated! Do you or your employer do business with the County? ~ !Not Indicated! NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. e Would you and/or any organizations with whom you are affIliated benefit from decisions or 1 recommendations made by this advisory board? ~ flot Indicated! Are you a registered voter in Collier County? ~ Do you currently hold public office? ~ 16 11 Do you currently or ever served on a Collier County Board or Committee? ~ lLely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committeej Education: !standard Liberal Arts Colleg~ Ex erience: icensed Communi e e 2 ~12 Mitchelllan 16 f 1 B 12 From: Sent: .0: ",bject: rslebodnik@aol.com Monday, August 16,20103:48 PM Mitchelllan New On-line Advisory Board Application Submitted Advtiory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (239)252-8606 Application was received on: 8/16120103:48:10 PM. Name: !Robert Slebodnikj Home Phone: ~39-775-349ll Home Address: 132 Pebble Beach Blvd.1 City: lNapl~ Zip Code: 1341131 Phone Numbers Fax: ~39-775-34911 Business: I----~ .Mail Address: k.,;h:h1dnik (l aul.coll~ Board I Committee Applied for: lLely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee! Category: INot indicatedj Work Place: lRetired! How long have you lived in Collier County: !more than Isl Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the law? ~ lNot lndicateclj Do you or your employer do business with the County? ~ 1N0t lndicate~ NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. . Would you and/or any organizations with whom you are affiliated benefit from decisions or 1 recommendations made by this advisory board? ~ 16 11 B 12 . ~ot Indicated! ere you a registered voter in Collier County? ~ Do you currently hold public office? ~ Do you currently or ever sen'ed on a Collier County Board or Committee? ~ !Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee! . Post Graduate Wor . 2 16 '~'1 B !.2 . Mitchelllan From: Sent: ...0' ...bject: gcallanpowers@gmail.com Friday, August 06,201011 :43 AM Mitchelllan New On-line Advisory Board Application Submitted Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (239)252-8606 Application was received on: 8/612010 11:42:36 AM. Name: ~erald c powers! Home Phone: 1239-775-03191 Home Address: 1236 pebble beach blvd. #40~ City: ~ Zip Code: 1341131 Phone Numben Fax: Business: .MaiI Address: ~caJJanpowcrs <I 'cmad ."""1 Board 1 Committee Applied for: ~ely golf estate~ Category: \Not indicated! Work Place: ~etired reading,ma. police dept.l How long have you lived in Collier County: !more than 151 Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the law? ~ !Not Indicated/ Do you or your employer do business with the County? ~ !Not Indicated\ NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. 'OUld you andlor any organizations with whom you are affiliated benefit from decisions or 1 16jlBJl2 recommendations made by this advisory board? ~ ~ot Indicate~ r you a registered voter in Collier County? ~ Do you currently hold public office? ~ Do you currently or ever senred on a Collier County Board or Committee? ~ ~ot Indicate~ Please list your community activities: Education: Experience: e e 2 c CD CII UI cC 0 :s ..... '" . -4 m II -v3 :s < ~II a o 3 ~ - CD-4 :s -il 3 N_ CD w- ~~ :s ,.... Ii:' 0....- ~ .....- ~o:u III C:~!=> :s III 'TI.....III CD r- .0 CD ....'TIM 3 OIlOt CD N M 0 'N~ :s .. wz . .!!II 'a ~ ~: ii ...... :s O'TI :s .....0 3" 0::3. Ota. CD II . ~ .... )> 0 ... .... a 0 ... i' .. i:i: i:i: i:i: i:i: i:i: i:0 ~ i~ 8.8. 8.8. 8.8. CD CD 8.8. 8.; a. a. ~ it it it it it it it it it it -~ -)0- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !!!la. ~ ~a ~I II ~I II 3~ ~~ ! .... 0 )0- 0 III III E <' <' ~ ~ 0 flI 5i ~ . ~ ....0 ::a ;Ill: )> ::a m )> :0 -4 \J ll:J:O ll:J:O i-4:O :0 \J i-4:O \J ~ i 2 OlD OlD _:~ ~ 2 (ilD 2 iil ~'2. ~< iil _113 iil 0 1111 ar n-o iii' 8;-0 0 ~ :sa 3-~ ~~~ a 2: 11< 2: 0 10 CD=lD CD ~ <- ~3: Q M =10 er~lr a. ~. er~lr ~ '" ii'~ lD ~ III ~ lD)( "'~Q. III "'~Q. m (10 11_ 11_ a. lD lD ::a (10 lD a!.:r all- erii 0 Q ~ o a. 2. III < III :s ~ "'lD ~ 2.c:~ _c:~ ~ ~ a \J Oa. ~ a!.x 3 a!.x c- o < c: 1if C. ~lD 'iii' "'glll a- ,..glll a- S lD 3 ~ a ii:1lJ~ (10 ii:1I::l Q. 0' ~o c: C. II ~ 3 c: a. IlJ 3 Z 5' ~ ~c. 3- -a.c. ~~~ ~. ~ lDII ~2C: ~ c. c. S!O 0 0 ~ ~ ::>.3 0'0'2. IlJ 0'0'2. ::a 'TI a, ;5~ IS' 1lJ::l1ll 3 IlJ::lII 0 Cil!!tii iil Cil!!t3- iil m Ii Qa. ~ II ~ ~ n ::t IlJ ;' IlJ ii ;'(10 0 = ~c: IlJ igii IlJ lD i $~ lD ~ i lD-g ~: (10 ~ 1lJ-a. ~ ~ .3 2:::l S !"l:"C J ~ !"l:"C ~ ~ 8;c. 8'.g 2 Ii 8'.g Ii lD!!. IlJ 0' m ::;; Q' ::llll (10 ::l1lJ Z - c.~ ~Cil ~ii C iii' 3-:C 51 ~cr ~cr !j 0 ~:o !!l 0'" a'" 0' lD CD ! ::lii ::lii S lD < 1lJ"Q. 1lJ"Q. ~. ii iia iia z '" ::l. ~. $ ::l lQ ::a m '" "'CI 0 Z '" m 0 ... n 0 ~ ~ m Z -t '" I~ 8 b> It=l::l ..~; b>~~ ~ ~~. 'OlD", o:=z c: CD c: ma;i 0-- c:~!. _::l a!l8' g~8: :3 0'" 3 2.ll CD 0 III ::l 0-' gaS" )( ~ 3 CD _ III III 0 III III 0 III a~~ 00 :T 31 ::l ~~= '0'0'0 III ::l.0 en 0 III -...1Il ~8'~ o ::l CD III CD III 8:~a a: 3 5' ggg, !!!..:T~ ~.,.-- CD m ~5' :::-l::U .;cm !1~"O c: CD (il(ilZ if :$. CD g.~(') !!!.Ill "'::li: !.Q.i: -.3 m ::mz Ill_-l ca :i" ~'!J8 en C N' 3 !D ::l ~ J lD ::l III ::l a. ~ J cr J i~~l~P 11 312 ~ 5' In: o~u: o~i":s~ IIO::li:.. 1t;1~~ .. III Cl:I CD ;1 ~o~o~~ ~~B~~r- ~3 m~c-< OCD :xloG> COo IlOcr-O ~~i~~ r-1Ila.:xlm o~ g!" oen CTQ.!::,,=i~ :~ll;:xl-l ~~ ~~rn ctCD hOOJ g~ :-.~~ i'~ !=l~~ It I =n .. ~ 0 o :-i ~ ~ ~ (5 ~ i'.Z o ~ ~ en ~ C:: CD 3 U> III (il 00 00 ::l ::l -Ill mE. n- o III ,,3- III 1Il- :xl:xl CD lD '0'0 i i CD CD ::l ::l mm ~~ !l! !l! ::~ 3 0' "T1J 3:: o- J)> CII. '<~ o G> CD .CD '" ~ ii' IlJ r- III ::l Q. III ~ '0 CD o 0' III CII < !!l. cr ::l :xl lD '0 o ~ en lD j 3 ~ 6 ~ 0' ~ [~ . o i ~ o ::r .... :; o g 11 tD 8 I: ~ mo :Z:CD -4 01: 1:1: 1:1: 1:1) < 0 1:1: 12 . . 110 .~ ':1' II . 8.8- 8-8- 8.~ !!. II . . Q, ~ ~ii1 1111 0 ~Q, If ~ Q,Q, ~ ii .... .. oii' ii'ii' ii'ii' -c:r ii'ii' i~ ':1'C') :I ~. 0 :I i .= C') i~ :I :I :1:1 (II a :1:1 . ..= i .. .. .CD .. .. ~ N Qr II .... .... .... .... ..... i . .... .... ..... . w a :I !. _ co ell..... ell CII ,.11 II :;- N~= :I C') Iii <0 r CI ':1' 3 CI · c: ? CD 0 e- CD rt!a. C') <' .. r ~ ? o. c: ~ I: II ;!;: . ~ c: II Q, . -C') . t!a.. . ii' .N II :I ..... C') . II . .... C') N W . 0 N N ::tJ 1) ~ 3: ::tJ ::tJ 3: 0::tJ ::tJ1ll3: 1) ::tJ ~~ ::tJ::tJ i 1)00'...::tJ -i-i :Ii-en :;ti;g~~ 5' 1) ::tJ ~~ ~ 2 0 III III c: '=lll III ... 0 2 III ~ ~ c~. ... = (D ; iil ::0- '" 2 ~ 5 g ~ 3 3 g: 33 :=:=:Ii 5 3 GO!! 32.0 X '2, !2.!. o.lil> lE 0 3 ... X"O ~ :> ... ... 0 0 0 c: 0 -3- 0 00 aOo!:'" "'...,a -:li~g"'ii' III ii' lillil ~ 0 0. iil ~ ~ 1) g:~ "'1llC: 1) ~ ~C ~ ~ '" :l:>-GOlil fi ~ . CD c: 3!::~::;~lil 'f' lil ~ 8. 6i:>~ ... :> '" CD 30. 0. a '" < ~ ..."0 ,..-GO 8. ::tJ '" :>, i i :I o:lioo.o. ~g: ~~=~~:i '- )( 0. lll~ III '" 5' :To 0. 1ll~C:1ll ! ! c: . 0 ... 2 III 0 ... 0 ~ 2-g g!lJl~' Q, ~ 3.. ... :T '" ... III III ~ III :> ...Ill ~ ~ ... III a "'3::liQ. ~. GO 0. ... '" ; '" 0. !l'lll 0_'" GO 0.0. 00 <Dc ~ oc:g5' 0. :> :>0:> aa o5'Ill~2" ~ FQ . g ~" :Ii GO 0 '" ~ ~"! '" '" ~~ ~ ~c5 ~~ o c:_ - III -4 0. ... 0. -"'0 0' ~ 9- ~~ ~ 0 ... III i '= a c: . ;;g c: ...... '= 0. ;;: ir '" ... '" 3' :>", 0. glDm~1>> "'''' = 0' i Ii III 3 3!QD 0 "'''' ~~ ... "C CTQ.Q1 GO 3 !l iii :T :> ~ 0. -4!!.0 i ~ ~"~;g.5. o 5" I:D ;::;;::) ; :> a 'TI [ 5' 5' 5' !il 1) c:r GO__ '" c:"O :Ii ; 2: 0"; 0 0. 0. c: 5" C'i 31 iil i~i ~ III 3... ... "'!?~~lt 0 ii' E' c: C') 8. ~ '" lJllJl III III = :>...:>0. ~ III III '" 1) i III :> CT =: =' III a< '" :;20 lll.o ~ :Ii;!!!.: a ~ '" 8. ~ 9- ~Ill o - 0 !;l iC '" fQ ~ ~ 5.~ 9- !!. ~ 5' gaii'~ g~ o.c: ~" Ill... ii' 0. ~ ~ ~ 0 5' III oiil :Ii::\.o "'1Il '" ~!" ~g !I c: 0 2 :I ~ ~ '" ~ ~ Ii '" '" ~i lJl 5' 5' Ill::\. l!- Ie iil 0. iC =llll=:'" 0 i c:r 0" c: ~ 0 i 0' cr 0 !! tl 2" ~~ ... III ,5g'[3 II> '" iD 1) '" S- O' ~ 3iil 0 III a ~ c:r ... c: 8. i o ;; !? 3 -:I ... -.!II ~~ iDiD ~s: :To.c:;iO :> ~ 0. 2 III :I '" 0 5' a ~o 5. :I::r:>-. ",1Il III "'0", III ~ 0. III c:r ~ ~. ~ fa ~ !} 1) ~ III iD 3 i ~ ~"'IIl<B C7(; tit I>> :J S" ... ~ !l II> ~ < c: :>;lIllC !!l. 5' III 0 IQ III ~ 0 III 2' !!. g: '" iD CD::J:J_ ...- 2.2'5.w 0. ..,Q.Q.Q) ;~ iil III 5. ir c: 3 0 '" = iil III i'" -. + III III o ... 0--+ :I II> "0 '" c: ~ fa lll"'- ~~a"i"'" :I re: s. (i ... 3 03g..:.. "'Ill 0. II> :I. ~ :T C'i iil "00. -:1- g Ii! :T III :T -a :T III 0 :lioGOX '2,11> ;:liGOx 0 5. 0 ~ c: III < CD III 0 ... 5' ~ i '" a II> III lB~5.~ :g:llll ~ lJl ~ 0.:1 Q, 0. :I 0 ~ III III 0. '" ~ < - ... _0. 0. III < ~ '" :T 0 :-;::;2'0. ;~ S.!" go? 0 2 III C ' iO:lF zs: III c:r '" g :I -40'!:!.-i ~ ::rl!:!.-4 5' '" cC. Ii ; c: 0.; 3 :I ~!:~; s. GO :I ~ !!.....:i!!. ~lB i' :> Q.CD!. 0. III 0. III 16 11 12 [ i i I i' ~ i I i' ;; 16 11 J 1 ~ . ~ 3 ID ::J - OJ III ~ CoO Q. () o " "< " n c i o S. So 5' m C3 ID ... III ~. loLl 8. 12 2 A A A W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N t0 O V 0) N A W N -� N -. 0 CO OD V 0) Cn A W N O CO 00 V 0) Cn A W N - 0 CO W V 0) 0) A W N - O O m m m ZO C C J D- m- m � n A 5 c D c° m y I- m a Z C Z O m m D D 73 m m z Z Z �' o C r AAAZ00OZ) Z >O 2.mAm ZZ 1 _n z3 yMOAtOnmmm rUZ) ' A « (Zn ZZ7 m -H -4000 Cmmm m� -1 m0rm ZOm - W 0� MKOZ20 -0 ai mmmppmm mZa = < OW-" M A 0) ' O Z m m X W v D M N m 0 Z m 0 0 m co H X X m m (0 -4M % > *.--H Z QZ000DD n ZD O 90m r m0XXOZZ > r-IXDmI- m ° Z < cam ,A2z IMI ZP,m > >00Q0 o � AOOO S1-4D Z {0 mzo > um -4 �m7 c£ 6°' A m0< ppKK °O XnMZkm Z -Zi -Z-I 01) n Z �O �? m1mD DA Cmm -Z 00 > m E TOAZD�DDD m z Z O y O m m m OC m n r ? m z - z n N m X X nmm r- 0, v y nm Zm > rD- C W ZmoD ° 1Hm rZZ mm o r I 1 (0 c) � ,- N (n0 ti 0 < _i X D m m m c r m m -i n D co n A m r z < o m D 0 0 n 44444444 444444 44444469 44(44949494444 4444444444 4444 4444(A EA 44444444 444444 4444 44 444444 44 M N N —> _ _ -, 00-,--, M O) W W N NC W m O 0) U' N N N N W N O) O 0) V 0) > 4f W Cn U1 N 0) U) O N F. w A A CN)) 44 N Ut N A N N 0 m a 00 0) O 0)i0 O (0 V V O O T 0 0 (0000 Co O O O O - o O W N O O N 0) O 0) .mi m 4)4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C.)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o C O O O 0 O, 000 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 , o O 0 0 • 0 o 0 r 0 r 0 b 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 444444694,04444 44444444 444944444444494944 49444444444444 En 44444444444449 44444444444444 C) O 3 W w 3 o O A N 4,.. r.) > N la W bb .43--.4 (0 > 3 40 0D O N) �.. C o O 0) O CO .,,W (V0 000 (NJ) 7 O O O W r r r b 0) r r r N O „ A r r r r r r r r r r a 00 0D co CD (n CO --40 0 44444444 444944 444A 4444 444444 44694444 4444 EA 4944 4444 4444 44 44 44444444 444444 4444 4944 4444 44 M X CD >N N 7 to N N W CA, N m O w g E W V U > W W OCn O > W A > N V > O 44 N 0 4) N N 0) CO V V W CA V > W O A V 44 0 OD O W C C) ,en O W O O O OD N N CO 0 N A o m W 0) V O- W O O A w W O N r r N W V 0 0 - -+ N N N O U) CO V A o A N 0) U) O N 0) O 0) -, - O O)D) 44 V CC > 0 0 0 O 00 A Ut 44 O) O ' A N 0) N O 44 N W 0 0 a) O O N CO A N ' O N 00c, O O N N 0 A 4, 0 0 N N O 0) o W C.) CO O 0 C) A 0) CO A N A 4444 6944 4444 44 40 EA 4444 4444 EA 44 EA 4444 4444 44 44404444 44 El)El)44 444,0 4444 44 EA EA 40 EA 444444 EA 69 W N N W W Wm -I < COMM -, 0000 N - A 44 W N 0) O 0) CO CO 0) >-'p 0) > A N U) N U) O (D O N 0 --c-,, a DC W 0 0 0 w w W OOD 00 N O W Ut O N A b"-bb O 00 00 N O O N 44 4 > Cr N N CO U) O 0 A CO A 0) 0) CO 0 O CO N C O C O CO W N N 0 m W 0D O o 0 p.-. w r , 00 00 on) N w O 0 A N A A V 0) 0 0 0) A O O W O) CA 44 N C) 0 0 0 CD 00 0 > C)U) C+) O O O Cn 00 A N ' t0 V A O ' O O (0 0 0 0 0 ' ' CON W U) in ' O N O o 0 N N O W 00 N A 00 v O 0 W O N 0) w V U) O 0 0 0) 9 0 9 0 0)0) CA W N m O 44 n V 3 0 O ) C C) C C) C 0 CO j 0) 0) m m m m m m m <F O C_ coOm m m X2 - a m a N rm O O O 0 0 - 0co FC) i30mmmCDCD m0n0 0g ' ' y - mmaCa33 `, � �N 330m m 0) m m y x x x � o 9° 9° A° AO 9° fA 5 0 n m r 3. :97 . 3 o O O 0 O m N O) N y N y n GI N m m m CO m 0 m C C G) Cl)T! Q m j o o o o o o y 9, 2. - 2- y ERE C J 7 > > C x m M p °- 0 0) 00 as=, 2 Cr m m Z CD M A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A N N ° A N N N AA N N 0 N N C CP Cf N N (n Y) N Cn Cn (n Cr (n Cn U) 51) G0 - - > 0 0 0 W W N V A W W 0 O O ut N N V C,,) g o o O N (n A 0) w 0) j N N V V 0) 0 U A 'D A W V v v N V W m # O N N 00 W V A A 0 0 N N W A W 44 C) N A(O CO CO U) Ut CA m 0)U' U)V m > CO W > O w CF O W V > 0)`< A 0> N CO CO A 00'< X ga > j m p (Aj 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O O y m -_ CO O OD 00 0 00 0 0 (n (O O V CEO �O 00 O) O CO N� ZZ Z N U) Z in (n N (n v) v, w 6 DD o wZ w 44 w in w U) ti) ZZZax m >D Dw0D000000 V w CONCD00AO DDD 0 A A O N U) O) O O) 0) 0) 0) V U) W ow Cw D N 00 N UN) O o (440 C W N 000000 -, 0 ,1 N m w < < < W m, N mm D > m [ [ [ 1- )(nm500Om mmmm o A ` o °0 CO° 2 0 v 2 a 3 B D D D D D m m m y o o o Cp o 0 o m . . O< n 0) C N C W W W O W .C5.. 0 N g fD CD CD :(O CD O fC G C m m .Z7 -O N �j 0 m m m m m m m m.. d m .y.. .y..y. .m.N 'm_ D'-) y a ai m 0 v 2 2 2 2 2 m m' m n > O y m 4� C� C ((�D' of v d m m `� X X m N N N O 0 y 0 'n DC fn (n l/) 2, ca m 2D (y0 C)D o d ro w 0 _- Q N y j 0 0 0 w 2, 2 2 y O O O H Fo y" _ CG m C) --I a J m m J {(7D o y a1 COD m m GD Ck . (7^ m< C C (D-0 2 7 (7'5 C 2 N (9 N 2 (9 4, 4, , a (j(�� O Vt.N m C m N » > > N 13 -0 m Z C7 CO d N (U a 0 0 < m p) m CO co C -< 4, —O m co co m m °o T › 6 715036 y • 0 E y 0- 0- a o 0 (n m o m to CD• m m 0 m CD m 3 .9 O m 2. 0 a � 2. D<) 000 33 0 3 0 O• rt m to .» O in ,- C y m 3 a 4) 0 y o . m z r m m afro to 2 0 W C K N u + y 0(0 V W 0 O at A 3 a 0, 44 4469 44 44 E9 44 44 E9 44 44 4469 44 44 4A 44 44 4469 44 44 44 44 44 4444 44 44 E9 44 A m _ CD 3 AN ZC A V ( 0 W N O ° o > o W W w > > » 5' D _ N A N A D 3 S O O O Co N--.4 U) j 00 A A in A Iv O V O) CO r. W . , CD N O m - N N V W 0) CD M CD 6 :4. O A O in O ' ' N m r r r r r r N r 0 0 0 r N 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 CO CO O • 49494449444444444944494949444944444444444949494444494444444444 C) _ -On > U) A N > N A > 0) -) Cw)) > 0 W V A. a C > A 2n A V A U) O CO U) CO N) O W > V 0) N > A(O w N (D N 0 A V ON) CA A W W 0) N N A W 0 O A O W A R N j O N V U)0) 0 V 00 O U)O A W O N A A. 00 U) W V N o A U) > N 0)O V 0 U) (n A O N b O O 0 (n N O 0 o 0 0 0 O > A O N A OD N (0 W N Cn U) > 0 o C) O N 0 0 0 m m W o O O O o o m m m 0 m N N W O 0 o A O > O O w O 16 1 :1 B Fiala ......i� ✓ . , . Halas Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Meetinglenning August 18, 2010 - 2:00 PM North Collier Regional Park€ytki •• - . I LU S-1 I ... „if, ,otr.t.,.. _1 ,., ,,iii x . A' - .-. N E 0 U I r f '1, . .,/ ,. -I— . ",.. ,... ,,,,,,,,... ,a,,,,,....„,, _NIA 1„,,,,,.,, '',,-:<:',...„.4:..t„ .,:4 t t .. — j G Summer Food Pr( } ,. i � , -....A. 1 ,41,,,,i, i i' k-- - . ...tit,- , „ ., ,,, , , , ,., ) - - ,,,,- 404 -,- AGENDA I. Call to Order VII. Marketing Highlights-Social Media Sites- II. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation Peg Ruby III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of June 16, 2010 Minutes VIII. Recreation Highlights- Edgerrin and Javarris James Free Football V. New Business Skills Camp-Annie Alvarez a) Employee of the Month for June and July- Chairman Ribes IX. Capital Project Highlights- Overview of b) Review of TDC Fund 183 Beach Park Existing Projects-Tony Ruberto Facilities-Gary McAlpin c)TDC Recommendation to use $1M from X. Adopt A Park- Ski Olesky Fund 183 -Jack Wert d)Joe Abrahams Leadership Class 2010 XI. Director's Highlights- Barry Williams Project-Shari Ferguson XII. Informational Items VI. Old Business XIII. Public Comments/Board Member Comments a) Parks Master Plan -Sidney Kittila XIV. Adjournment Misc. Corres. b) 2010 Annual Update Inventory Report 1.)-, l -Sidney Kittila `Q�aExcoov,` Date: c) Fee Policy Revisions- Barry Williams (y \ Item#. / a i t3 Parks Recreation '-pies to: P/ai...nrmN!c Or:.s::r . \ 1.f ... ~ ~ "j 1 16 "1 t~~olO MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Naples, Florida, June 16,2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 2:00 P.M. at North Collier Regional Park Exhibit Hall, 15000 Livingston Road, Naples Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: VICE CHAIR: John P. Ribes Edward "Ski" Olesky Barbara Buehler Phil Brougham (Excused) Kerry Geroy (Excused) David Saletko William Shafer (Excused) ALSO PRESENT: Kerry Runyon, Regional Manager III Tony Ruberto, Sr. Project Manager Nancy Olson, Regional Manager I Annie Alvarez, Regional Manger II Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Mgmt. Director Peg Ruby, Marketing Specialist Tona Nelson, Administrative Assistant Sidney Kittila, Operations Coordinator Rich De Galan, Sun N Fun Supervisor Julie Allen, ENCP Program Leader Yvette Spiker, GGCC Program Leader ; ~ ; 16 1\ '1 &ln~6, 20'10 . I. Call to Order John Ribes called the meeting to order at 2:08 pm and a quorum was established. II. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation The Pledge of Allegiance was recited and Invocation was held. III. Approval of Agenda Move: V. c. to V. a. TDC Grants Barbara Buehler moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by Edward "Ski" Olesky. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. Approval of May 19, 2010 Meeting Minutes David Saletko moved to approve the May 19, 2010 Minutes as submitted. Second by Barbara Buehler. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. V. New Business a) TDC Grants Gary McAlpin gave a slide presentation on the 5- Year Plan. He recommended the Advisory Board approve Category "A" Tourist Development Fund 183 Grant Applications for the following beach park facilities in the amount of $5, 142,600 to be allocated as follows. (See attached) . Bluebill Restrooms, Access and Turnaround - $230,000 . Vanderbilt Beach Restroom Expansion - $376,000 . Tigertail Restroom and Walkovers - $7,300 . Gulf Shore Property Purchase - $3,304,300 . Gulf Shore Property Improvements - $1,000,000 . Gulf Shore Purchase of2 Trolleys - $125,000 . Marco Beach Restroom and Access Improvements - $100,000 Other Projects included in the 5- Year Plan . Delnor- Wiggins State Park entrance road and parking improvements. . Vanderbilt Beach Pedestrian Access #3 has been completed. . Vanderbilt Beach Pedestrian Access # 2 through #6 had been funded. . Vanderbilt Beach Access is ongoing. . New Clam Pass Turnaround and Parking, Shade Shelter and possibly an Observation Deck. . Cocohatchee Parking Improvements and Back Way Pier. Staff balanced funds requested from the TDC with the following accounts. . Tourist Taxes- $2,153,300 . Carry Forward - $3,150,800 . Revenue - $107,700 2 " \ ". f \...) ... 16 IJl 8,13 June 16,2010 ... .. Barbara Buehler moved to approve the Category "A" Tourist Development FUlld 183 Grant Applications for beach park facilities ill the amount of $5,142,600. Second by John Ribes. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved to approve the 5-Year Plan and TDC Fund 183 as presented. Second by David Saletko. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. b) Presentation on VPK Julie Allen and Yvette Spiker gave a presentation on Florida's Voluntary Prekindergarten Program. (See attached) They announced the purpose of this program is to prepare four-year old children for kindergarten and build a strong foundation for their continued educational success. ~ The program is free for all children who are 4 years old by September I and residing in Florida. ~ Registration is free. ~ Proof of child's age and proof of residency are required when registering for the program. The program will be offered at the following locations: ~ East Naples Community Park ~ Golden Gate Community Center ~ Immokalee Community Park ~ Max Hasse Community Park Annie Alvarez stated the Program is funded by the state. The options are: ~ School Year Program - 540 Instructional hours beginning in fall. ~ Summer Program - 300 Instructional hours beginning in summer. ~ Revenue for the School Year Program per child is approximately $2410 per year. ~ Staff for each location has been state certified. ~ Some registrations have been received. ~ The VPK Program will begin on August 30. The Staff stated the program will help bilingual children get acclimated to English. The State monitors the program success 30 days after the VPK participants begin kindergarten. Sidney Kittila commended Julie Allen and Yvette Spiker for going above and beyond in their efforts to develop the VPK Education Program. Both Program Leaders received the "Employee of the Month" Award. c) Introduction of Beach and Water Manager Kerry Runyon introduced Nancy Olson to the Advisory Board as the new Beach and Water Regional Manager. 3 . .' 16 111 Jll~;b~o ., VI. Old Business a. Update on Adopt A Park Review Kerry Runyon addressed concerns reported by Phil Brougham on May 19 for the following facilities. Port of the Islands Marina ~ The dumpster is in code violation. The entire parking lot has been scheduled to be refinished. When parking lot is finished the dumpster will be placed on a pad. ~ The boat ramp signage. A large sign has been installed in front of the building. County Collier logo sign has been installed on glass entry doors. ~ Boat/Motor washing station Port of the Islands Marina is a designated clean marina and salt water boat washing service will not be available until we have a proper wash station. ~ The gas pump station A new pump will be installed in a 6- week period. ~ A wooden roof covers a paved patio The cover will be replaced. ~ The Clerk has to work at a small desk without any workspace. The Clerk area has been cleaned up and a new fax has been installed. Bavview Park ~ The playground walkway. The playground walkway has been patched. ~ Wood pilings along the dock are in need of repair or replacement and bumper padding. Emergency repairs have been completed by Staff. Hazard pilings have been removed. The dead trees are down and cut up. ~ The pavilion floor needs to be power washed. The pavilion floor has been power- washed. Max Hasse Park ~ Outfield drainage issues. Collier County is doing additional repair work on the storm drainage problem. b. Annual Update & Inventory Report Update Sidney Kittila stated recommendations will be provided to the Advisory Board on the Level of Service at the August meeting. The Level of Service expected to be lower than 2.9. c. Update on Boat Launch Fees- Discussed after VII VII. Marketing Highlights - June Events Peg Ruby announced the following upcoming events. (See attached) · School's Out Celebration at Sun-N-Fun Lagoon on June 12. · "Dive in Movies" at Sun- N- Fun Lagoon on June 19. 4 . '.,. ~ r' ,~. l'-.. \ M ~. ~ I. ,,-' 16' f~ -a13 June 16,2010 . Father's Day Celebration at Sun-N-Fun Lagoon on June 20. All fathers will get in free with one paid admission. . 4th of July at Sun-N-Fun Lagoon. All active military will get in free with one paid admission. . Freedom Friday at Sun-N-Fun Lagoon on July 9 from 6-9 pm will feature a Slurpee Drinking Contest and prizes. . A free Ice Cream Social will be held on July 31 from 1-4 pm at Sugden Regional Park. VI. Old Business c. Update on Boat Launch Fees Kerry Runyon stated last year Boat Launch Fees were increased for commercial and residential. The Board of County Commissioners requires justification for the fee increase. The Staff will report on boat launch fees at the August meeting. VIII. Recreation Highlights - Update on Aquatic Facilities Rich DeGalan gave a presentation on the Sun N Fun Lagoon and reported: · The pool facilities are inspected by the Health Department twice a year. · The Department of Agriculture Bureau of Fair Rides inspects slides twice a year. · Prior to the Health Department and Department of Agriculture Bureau inspections the Parks and Recreation hire an independent engineer certify that equipment is in proper working order. · All the pool facilities have a Staff Certified Pool Operator. He reported Sun N Fun activities and revenues. · May was a cold slow month and produced $30,000 in revenue. · More Family Membership Passes for $195 are being sold due to the economy. · Water Walking, Zumba and Hyper-thon Programs are in place. · 4- Swim lesson sessions are offered weekdays plus Saturday. Revenues from all programs have grown. · FY 2008 - $1,000 · FY 2009 - $11,000 · FY 2010- Estimated to be over $20,000 · FY 2011- Plans are to offer more programs during the fall and spring with a goal to double 2010 revenues. Rich DeGalaD reported hosting · Hot Summer Nights at Sun-N- Fun on April 24 and May 14 to celebrate a Drug Free environment. · Dive- In Movies · Mother and Father Day Events · Schools Out Bash in June · Back to School Bash in August · Sun N Fun rentals have been booked with revenue estimated at $31,000. 5 ~' -:J. 16 I , '8 l?t6,20;0 IX. Capital Project Highlight Tony Ruberto gave a presentation on Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park. ~ The park was previously designed 2 years ago. ~ The park acquired the lake one year ago. ~ A consultant will be hired to survey around the lake. ~ Collier County is looking for a better way to access the park. ~ Collier County will need to acquire easements prior to developing the park. ~ Parking lot is currently used for dry storage. ~ Plans are to install a ramp and a pathway around the entire lake. ~ The lake is approximately 2-3 feet deep. ~ Parking Lot Project cost will be $50,000-$60,000. ~ Dry Storage Project cost will be $35,000 ~ The Project is scheduled to begin the end of summer. X. Adopt a Park - None. XI. Director's Highlights Kerry Runyon reported the FY 2011 Proposed Budget will be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for review on June 24 and in September they will vote on it. (See attached) She reported the Parks and Recreation Department will redirect $250,000 earmarked for the East Naples Maintenance Shed to Max Hasse Park to expand that facility to accommodate the State Child and Family Services Program to meet the criteria to continue programs. XII. Informational Items The next meeting is scheduled for August 18 at North Collier Regional Park Exhibit Hall at 2:00 pm. XIII. Public CommentslBoard Member Comments David Saletko asked when the scoreboard at Veterans Park would be installed. The Staff stated they would discuss the installation with Tony Ruberto. John Ribes expressed concern on TDC Grant Presentation regarding the cleaning of the beach facility restrooms twice a day. He stated the schedule was not enough to care for the facility. He expressed the need for larger facilities. Staff responded the County receives neighborhood resistance to larger facilities. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 3:35 PM. 6 . . . 16 \t..1 3 June 16,2010 COLLIER COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Chairm '0. ~COI \0 These Minutes were approved by the Committee/Board on presented y/ or as amended . , as 7 c o o 11O '" -' c :J u. Z C :J Vl C o '" .... '" o - 0 N 0 en C") t-. lD C") '<t lD C") lD '<t C") Il'l CO CO r-. ~ Il'l t-. CO 0 0 en Il'l .... en .... Il'l N .... Il'l en 0 lD CO en Il'l t-. CO CO CO CO C") t-. .... lD Il'l ~ .... M en CO ai' M r-= 0 M cD ..; M .... ..; 0 0 en .... Il'l j;;: ! .... 0 I'- I'- 1.0 ..- ..- I'- N 1.0 ..- 0 I'- 0 0 0 0 N Il'l m 1.0 N 1.0 ..- 1.0 0 C"l '<t ..- I'- lD a. '<t ..- <D '<t 1.0 N ..- ..- LD_ M Gl c0 ..- r-= tJ) C"l N 0 C') '<t '<t ..- C"l CO '<t C"l '<t 0 0 0 <D Il'l CO 0> I'- CO N N 1.0 0 '<t <D N 0 <D '<t r-. C) ..- N ..- '<t CO ..- I'- CO r-. C"l CO :J ..- C') ..- ai' <( ..- .... m '<t '<t 0 m m 1.0 CO C"l '<t 0> ..- I'- 0 0 ..- M m ..- '<t <D 1.0 ..- m N CO 0 1.0 CO C"l CO >- <D m ..- N CO 0 N ..- CO C"l '<t ..- '<t Il'l :i ..- m ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- 0 ..., ..- M CO m CO C"l CO 0 <D C"l '<t N C"l C') <D CO N N Il'l 1.0 1.0 ..- I'- '<t CO CO 0 I'- ..- ..- '<t N '<t N 0 lD Gl I'- ..- ..- 0 CO ..- ..- 0> N C"l ..- N CO '<t ~ C ..- ..- CO ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- 0 ::I ..- M ..., C"l 1.0 1.0 ..- '<t ..- CO C"l <D 0 '<t 0 0 N 1.0 CO Il'l ~ <D C"l 1.0 '<t N '<t 1.0 ..- N 1.0 C"l Il'l ..- <D CO A. N C"l ..- N. I'- ..- en ..- ..- ..; :E .... <D <D <D m ..- C"l I'- C"l co <D N <D <D 0 0 '<t M N 0 '<t r-. <D ..- I'- '<t ..- '<t co C"l C"l t-. ... '<t. N N 1'-. N. ..- N N t-. a. ..- .n ..- ..- 0 <( ..- N I'- en N r-. 1.0 0 0 ~ '<t C"l 0 0 '<t 1.0 ..- 0 0 0 ..- co C"l N N ..- '<t N 0 ... co C"l 0> A. '<to co oi ..- .... :E .... m 0 co m I'- ..- N ..- co ..- '<t 0 0 0 0 1.0 Il'l m ..- co ..- N N ..- C"l N .a '<t ..- 1.0 1.0 co lD Gl ><i cD LL N 1.0 <D 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I'- N ..- N N ..- co C ..- .... co ..., I'- 0 ..- co ..- 0 0 <D N ..- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD '<t N I'- C"l 1.0 N Il'l U 1.0 0> '<t C"l M Gl C"l .n- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '<t 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..- > 0 Z co ..- '<t N t- ..- N 0> N N 0 0 0 0 C"l co <D co <D m N co C"l '<t co .. N N '<t. 1.0 Il'l U ..- M 0 Ul Ul co Ul ell Ul Gl 0 Ql .c Ql .c (/) en .c u .c u en Ql u .E u .E z Gl .c .E .E 0 .c u co co (i) u .E co '<t co '<t .E '<t ... '<t ... (/) Ul co ... Ql ... Ql i! ... fI) Gl co '<t Gl 'C Ql 'C eo Gl Gl .c '<t > C > c eo 0 'C .c u ... 0 0 ::I '<t C u .E ... Gl ::I '<t ... c( ::I .E Ql 'C C C C C ... Ql eo > C Z co 0 ::I 0 0 0 0 Ql 'C '<t eo 0 'C co '<t 'ijj 'ijj .. .. > C C '<t ... c C a. a. 0 ::I ... '<t 0 co ... Gl 0 en Ul E E C) Ql ... Ul ~ Gl 'C 0 'e 'e c c 'C "0 'C Ql C Ul l!! > c 'ijj 'ijj 0 Ql Ql :c Ql Ql C > 0 c co 0 ::I Ul en 'C 'C 'ijj "0 "0 co ::I ::I ::I 0 'iij 0 Gl 'e 'e <( <( en ell Gl ;: en en Ul {! 'iij Z >- en en .. .. 'e 0:: 0:: ,(!! ,(!! 1::: ,(!! Ul ::) M ell Gl 'C "0 a. a. .>0: .>0: ... .>0: .>0: 0 0 E 'E ftj ftj <( <( E E 'C U U ell U U a. a. "0 I&. C tJ) tJ) ... ... Gl ell <( Ql Gl > ell ell tJ) tJ) "0 . f co co )( )( .c .c 0:: .c .c <( <( Z a. a. ... . ::!2 ::I ::I :i :i w w .!2 u u u u a. a. ... ftj Z C C >- c ,5 0:: 0:: ell ::) :c 0 0 C) C) )( )( c '; .; N .; 0 0 .c .. ... ... ell ell co co ell co ell .. 0 ..!! 0 C) C) 0:: 0:: l- I- tJ) 0:: 0:: ..J 0:: 0:: Z Z 0 I- '" c o '':; ~ OJ 0. o L- '" OJ >- ro 16 J. 1 -0 I- >- en o co o J 1t7 o!!J!l' .... M r-.lD cD NOI'-O....lDenN Il'llDOONI'-I'-.... ~~M~~~~~ .... '<t'<t ~~,,~ ~ M '<t ~ ~::g C")MNN'<t MCO M N' ..; u:i .... '<t .... t'-I'-LOO~O m 1.0 N 1.0 Q.V~ CD Gl c0 tJ) :g~~~u; C')V't"""""t""""OCD :JT""" I'-LO <( ~~~~~~t--- ~LON,""""'t"'"" co ..- N N 1.0 M, <D I.ONO>..-I'-C"l..-O'<tC"l I.Omm..-l.OmN'<tCO N't"'""'t"'""CX)O co ..- ..- ..- ..- t-. N t-. <D C") C"l M N I.OI.000mO>OI'-..-0..-<DI'-<DmOOOONlD COC"lC"lcom o..-mN'<tCOC"lCO<D cot-. >-NN C"l..- oco..-C"lm r-...- '<ten :iN 00 N"- C"lN' , 't"'""~ M <DNm<DI.OO<DO>..-<DI.OCONm'<tOOOI.OC") <DN'<t1.01'- mC"lI.OO<DNI'-<DN N'<t ellCOC"l 1.00> 1.01'- coco..- '<t..- C"len ~'t"'"" m~ 't"'"" ~~ ::I N ..., <Do>o'<tmOI.O<DI.OC"l<Dm<D<Do>ooomN >-~~C"l~~ ~N ~O> ..-~C"l ~~ ~ ><iN ..-~ o 1.0 ..- <D<D..- ... C"l ~..- C"l<DOCOmC"lCO<DN'<tNI.OOOO'<tlD 1.00 O<D 0<0 ..-N..- NN ~N co I'- ~t-. ~m ~ 't"'"" 't"'""N N O>COC"lC"lt-OI'-OOOOOI.OO'<tOO"-COIl'l ~N't"'""V~ ~ 't"'"" M v~ ~I'- ~C.D I'- 't"'""~ ~ Nc0 ~ ..- ..- .a '<t ell LL O>'<tI'-'<tONI'-'<t<D<o..-ONOOOOI.OCO ~~ ~~'t"'""~ LO I'-~ 't"'""N ~ I.O<ONC"lCOO<DOoo>mo..- ON mN <DC"l '<t N cT""" cooo T""" '\:"""" co .., OOOONO.... ..- '<t o N' C"lo'<tOCO<Dl'-mNNN"-"-OOOOC"lOCO o '<tI'-COCO'<tCO'<t N en uC"l 1.OM,C"l C"l .... ~ N..- .n- > o Z OOOOOOOOOOOOC"lOOOOOOM ~R~g~o~~'<t~~C"lOO"-O'<tO~: ~N NeD N T""" ~~ CJ T""" M o en o tJ) Z o iii tJ) :E o <( Z o o C) <( ..J Z ::I It Z Z ::I ~ Ul ell Ul "5 ~ ~ ~ ,5 ~g~~ "0 co '<t ell C '<t ... > ell ... ell 0 en ell "0 ~ ... > c c ~ 0 ::I ell >-~~~ M ftj ftj ell a;tJ)tJ)0:: :2g.g.~ :c e e 0 oC)C)o Ul en ell ell "5.c .E ,5 COco ~'<t Ql ~ > 'C o C C ::I o 'ijj III 'e "0 <( ... .!!! ... ~~ ell 0 O::U Ul Ul ell ell .c rn.cu ~ g .E u .E co '<t ... ell 'C C ::I C ~ .* C Ul ~ 'e 'iij "0 &!-: .!!! ::I C) ell 0:: co co'<t '<t ... ... ell ell "0 > C 0::1 C C o 0 'ijj 'ijj Ul en 'e 'e g "0 'C 'ijj <( <( en -a. -a. 'e ~ ~ ~ )( )( ... W W 0 )( )( '2 ell co ell I- I- tJ) en Ul ell ell .c .c u u .E .Eco co'<t '<t ... ... ell ell "0 eo >c eo'<t 0::1 '<t... c: c: .... Q) o 0 ell "0 .... > C a.a.C)O::l EEc"O"O ~ ~ :g ~ ~ 0:: 0:: 3: .!!! .!!! .>0: .>0: ... .>0: .>0: U U ell u U ell ell > ell Gl "5"50::"5"5 CC>-CC .; '; N .- .; o::o::j~o:: ~ C Gl > W ftj 'u ;eo 8- ...'<t tn CD.... en 'C Gl C en ; >0 0 Co !II !II 'ijj'ijj 't: 't: :l 'E!!! III o 0 co 'e a. a. a. 'C "0 tJ) tJ) ... <( <( a.a.8-~ 0:: 0:: a..c S o 0 0.. 0 ZZ:I:OI- ro ...... ro o .... ro QJ >- (f) V1 U :;:; V1 .';:; 1:l V) .... QJ tlD C ro 0:: . ..- ~ \...1 ! ; ... .. \ f w >- I- a. W rn C) ::J <( >- ...J ::J ..., .- 1.0 N .- CO I'- 0 0 ..r w 1.0 0 0 .- .- C') N N Z .- ::J ..., I'- C') 0 0 N 0 C') 0 N ..r ..r <D .- .- >- N Q) <( 2 0 Q) I'- C') C') co N 0 0 ...J Q) N 1.0 N .- N ..r C') Ii: .- a. <( <D I'- Q) C') N I'- 0 0 0 :x:: .- I'- co U N .- 1.0 0::: .- <( 2 <D Q) N C') ..r 1.0 0 0 0 co N N .- m .- Q) W LL C') N <D N I'- 0 .- 0 0 C') C') <D N .- Z N ..r <( .- ..., co Q) N <D N 0 0 0 0 ..r 1.0 I'- .- U .- co W 0 co C') 0 I'- N co 0 0 0 .- Q) .- co .- > .- N 1.0 0 .- Z N co <D Q) I'- I'- 1.0 0 0 <D Q) .- <D .- I- .- .- C') U N 0 0 ..... 0 N U Z Z rn <( l- I- a. 0::: rn u u rn I- w w rn 0 0 u ..., i= rn rn rn u 0::: a. w <( 0 0::: C) Z Z ::J W l- I- 0::: <( C) z 0 <( 0 0::: en z a. a. z z i= 0::: :x:: 0::: :> 0 w w Z 0::: <( <( w w u > > 0::: <( I- W ~ C) rn ...J i= i= <( 3: () a. in z w <( w w 3: a. <( I- 0::: 0::: Z C) <( 0::: en z ...J 0::: 0 a. a. <( w Z I- W 0::: 0::: I- 52 0::: C) Q. ~ rn m I- 0::: 0::: 0::: W W 0::: Ii: 0::: ::J Z U <( W l- I- W <( 0 <( ~ a. a. z z > 3: a. u 0::: 16 J 1 B '1 , co +-' co Cl .... co (I) >- ('f') III U :p III :p CO +-' Vl .... (I) 00 C CO a: 16 f 1 Bjl3 en ...... ...... C') en en .... 0 ...... 0 C') IX) <0 C') 0 IX) C') It) .... It) .... 0 C') "l:t W .... C') <0 ~ N ..... co '<t co IX) ...... C'\l 0 0 0 0 C') 0 I- ..... ...... ..... a. ..... w (/) co N ..... (J) co C') ..... 0 C') 0 It) co N N N C> 0 :::I ..... <( co 0 '<t IX) ...... 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 N (J) ~ C') ..... ..J ..... :::I ..., co co '<t '<t co co C'\l 0 0 0 w co ...... N ...... ..... ..... N co ..... Z ..... :::I ..., co co C') co It) 0 ...... 0 ...... 0 ..... co C') co N ..... It) ~ ..... co ..... <( ..... ..... :E co co '<t co co N C'\l 0 0 0 ..J C') '<t C') '<t C') ..... ..... 0 C') ~ N ..... a. <( co ..... '<t It) It) 0 C'\l 0 0 0 :I: ...... ..... N ...... ..... ..... 0 u ..... '<t 0 ..... tt:: C'\l ..... <( :E '<t (J) '<t C') C') N C'\l 0 N 0 0 C') ..... '<t ...... N ..... '<t III ..... ...... C') w C') u. ..... C') N '<t ..... 0 C') 0 0 0 co co ..... C') C') C'\l Z C') N <( N ..., (J) ...... It) (J) 0 (J) 0 0 It) 0 co ...... N C'\l ..... U C') C'\l W N C It) N ...... N '<t 0 0 0 0 0 (J) C') It) N ..... > co N 0 ..... z C') It) It) (J) '<t 0 0 0 0 0 co C') '<t I- (J) C'\l U ..... en 0 0 a. tt:: u Z z (/) <( l- I- a. tt:: (/) U U (/) 0 I- W i= w (/) c u ..., (/) (/) (/) U tt:: a. w <( 0 tt:: C> Z Z :::I W I- tt:: <( C> z 0 ..J tt:: I- Z <( 0 <( en z a. a. z i= tt:: :I: > It: :> 0 w w z It: <( <( w 0 w U > > tt:: <( I- W C> (/) i= i= <( s: a. ~ :E z W ..J s: u a. m w ~ I- <( W W Z C> <( tt:: Z tt:: tt:: ..J tt:: en 0 a. a. <( w Z I- W U a. ~ (/) tt:: tt:: III ~ 52 tt:: C> i= tt:: tt:: tt:: w w tt:: i2 tt:: :::I Z 0 U <( W l- I- W <( 0 <( >< z z s: ~ a. a. - > a. u tt:: w . IX) ...... N It) .... ...... 0 0 0 0 C') en "l:t 0 '<t .... '<t 0 It) N <0 C') .... C') w w .... C') <0 ~ ~ N It) 0 0 co ...... ...... 0 0 0 0 0 co ..... ...... C') l- I- ..... ...... N a. a. N w W (/) (/) co '<t N C') co C') 0 0 0 0 It) co ..... C'\l C> C> N :::I :::I ..... <( <( ..... '<t ...... (J) (J) co 0 0 0 0 It) C') N (J) ..... ..... ~ ~ N N ..J ..J ..... :::I :::I ..., ..., 0 '<t IX) (J) 0 0 0 .... It) C'\l co 0 C') It) 0 0 0 0 w ..... C') C'\l IX) co '<t N 0 N '<t ..... It) w (J) C') z z ..... :::I :::I ..., ..., 0 ..... '<t N 0 0 0 ...... It) C') It) (J) co co 0 0 0 0 ..... ..... C'\l C') ...... C') co ..... '<t ..... ~ co C') N .... ~ ..... (J) (J) <( .... <( ..... :E :E 0 C'\l It) N 0 (J) 0 co '<t '<t C') 0 (J) 0 0 0 0 0 ..J ...... ...... co IX) en ..J 0 0 It) C') co ..... co C') ...... C') C') ..... (J) '<t ~ N ~ ..... ..... a. a. <( <( 0 '<t <0 (J) 0 ..... 0 0 It) C'\l '<t <0 It) ..... 0 0 0 0 :I: co '<t ...... '<t M :I: (J) It) N <0 C') ..... U <0_ C') 0 '<t It) U ...... ...... tt:: .,.... .,.... M tt:: C'\l <( <( :E :E It) C'\l co .,.... 0 co 0 0 It) 0 co '<t .,.... C') C') (J) III III (J) It) w w .,.... u. u. co C'\l ...... '<t ...... ...... 0 0 ...... 0 co It) ..... 0 .,.... It) z Z '<t It) <( <( .,.... ..., ..., co 0 <0 '<t (J) '<t 0 0 It) 0 (J) C'\l .,.... C') .,.... '<t U U (J) C'\l W W N C C It) co co It) '<t co 0 0 0 0 It) N .,.... <0 co > > C') co 0 0 .,.... z z It) co <0 co '<t N 0 0 C') 0 co ...... N It) N N <0 l- I- 0 <0 U U N IX) 0 0 0 a. I-- I-- W tt:: U Z > Z (/) <( (/) tt:: (/) I- a. en w (/) I- U W (/) (/) (/) tt:: (/) U (/) U w w 0 I- W i= w (/) 0 W :I: U C U ..., (/) (/) U tt:: .... U tt:: U U a. w <( 0 tt:: (/) C> Z :::I 0 <( a. <( ~ U :I: U w tt:: <( C> z 0 Z ..J N <( !:: I- <( 0 W tt:: U <( tt:: a. a. z ~ en :I: :I: <( W <( (/) z z i= tt:: :I: C U U III :I: It: :> 0 w w Z tt:: <( <( Z III III I- a. tt:: w U w U > > tt:: <( !:: w w 0 0 III ~ :E :::I l- I- ..J (/) III C> (/) ..J i= i= <( s: U a. m 0 0 0 m (/) :I: ..J 0 Z W <( W W s: a. w <( (/) <( <( !:: tt:: tt:: Z C> <( tt:: tt:: 0 0 tt:: u. U Z ..J tt:: <( u. u. w a. ..J I- tt:: ..J tt:: (/) 0 a. a. <( w Z I- W U tt:: I- Z W W c :E :::I <( <( a. ~ (/) tt:: tt:: III I- 52 tt:: C> i= tt:: tt:: tt:: Z :3 C> w :E I- tt:: tt:: tt:: w w tt:: ~ tt:: :::I Z 0 :::I <( <( <( C> 0 U <( W l- I- W <( 0 <( >< I- III III > U Z i= en I- z a. a. z z > s: a. U tt:: w ro ..... ro o "- ro OJ >- M Vl u '':; Vl ".:; ro ..... VI "- OJ tlO C ro 0:: .\ l.- BJ3 61 . 1 . .1. <0 ..- N It) ." 0 0 eo 0 ." -.r N -.r r- eo <0 ." r- M ..- M -.r 0 -.r ..- eo r- <0 ..- N ." M ..- It) eo 0 N ..- It) eo N ." ..- N M ..- ..- M UJ 0 N N cD N UJ >- N r- >- 0 ..- l!) 0 0 0 l!) M 0 r- -.r I'- eo ..- M l!) ..- l!) eo ..- N I- <D -.r ..- M 0> N ..- ..- N. eo ..- M ..- I- a. ..- M 0... UJ W C/) (/) <D 0 '<t <D M 0 N l!) <D l!) M N N l!) N M N M 0 ..- M 0> ..- eo N N '<t ..- N C) l!) eo '<t ..- C) :::l ..- '<t :::l <( <( M 0 '<t eo l!) 0 l!) ..- <D ..- '<t I'- ..- M M l!) '<$' I'- eo ..- <D M N M M N eo ..- N >- '<$'. N N M ..- >- ...J ..- l!) ...J :::l :::l ..., ..., N 0 N l!) l!) 0 eo ..- N eo N N N ..- N 0 <D ..- eo 0> <D M eo M l!) ..- N 0 ..- -.r <D ..- UJ 0 0> ..- N '<$' ..- 0> ..- l!) '<t l!) I'- N ..- ..- N 0> 0 N -.r ..- UJ eo N. I'- ..- Z ..- <D Z ..- <D :::l :::l ..., ..., M 0 N <D 0 0 N eo '<t 0> ..- 0 N 0> '<$' '<$' 0 ..- l!) I'- I'- <D I'- '<$' N M '<$' N N 0> ..- N ..- eo M N ..- <D M l!) ..- ..- eo I'- ..- eo l!) <D <D N >- l!). l!) <D <D ..- >- 0> eo eo ..- <( ..- <D <( ..- <D 2 2 0> 0 M 0 N 0 0 l!) 0 eo 0> <D '<$' l!) l!) M N N ..- l!) eo N <D <D N '<$' '<$' '<$' I'- N ..- ...J 0 M N 0> 0 M 0 ..- ...J <D M ..- M eo 0> <D ..- N ~ eo l!) N I'- N ~ 0 N. ..- 0> ..- ..- I'- N 0> a. a. <( <( '<$' 0 N 0 0 0 eo 0> 0 M N ..- l!) 0> l!) N ..- N l!) I'- 0> 0 '<$' ..- l!) ..- 0 0 -.r '<$' l!) ..- ::c I'- 0> M M N N I'- N N ::c '<$' M N M ..- <D eo ..- ..- M U eo I'- M <D N U eo eo M 0> N 0::: ..- I'- 0::: ..- eo <( <( 2 2 I'- 0 '<$' N 0 ..- N M eo 0> eo 0> 0> M I'- 0 N 0 '<$' 0> 0> 0> ..- eo ..- M 0> l!) 0> ..- ..- M ..- N I'- M ..- ..- ..- ..- 0 0 N 0 I'- N ..- N III 1'-_ <D N l!) N III -.r. eo M N ..- UJ ..- <D UJ ..- '<$' u.. u.. '<$' 0 ..- eo 0 I'- I'- 0> ..- 0> I'- <D l!) N ..- -.r M <D '<$' 0> I'- 0 ..- M 0 '<$' 0 -.r N eo I'- M I'- I'- ..- I'- N ..- M -.r N <D <D M M ..- N Z 0 0> M l!) N Z <D_ O> N '<$' ..- <( N <D <( ..- '<$' ..., ..., N 0 0 N 0 N ..- N <D N 0 M I'- N '<$' N N I'- M l!) M <D eo ..- 0 ..- ..- l!) <D ..- l!) 0 0 ..- 0> l!) ..- M ..- ..- ..- l!) I'- ..- M ..- ..- ..- N U ~ N. '<$' N U N M ..- N ..- UJ ..- <D UJ ..- '<$' 0 0 0> 0 ..- '<$' 0 M N '<t ..- 0> M l!) 0> '<$' l!) 0> M 0 ..- <D <D N 0 '<$' N l!) 0> I'- eo ..- ..- <D 0 N '<t -.r ..- I'- N I'- l!) ..- <D I'- ..- ..- N > <D. l!) ..- '<$' N > ..- ..- ..- N ..- 0 ..- l!) 0 ..- -.r z z I'- 0 '<$' 0> 0 I'- '<$' '<$' N 0 0> I'- '<$' M I'- 0> <D M l!) M <D M I'- N ..- 0 0> N <D N 0 <D N l!) ..- 0 ..- ..- ..- '<$' <D ..- I'- eo M ..- ..- I- eo <D ..- l!) ..- ?- M N N ..- U ..- l!) U ..- M 0 0 0 I~ Z ..- Z ." (/) <( 0 C/) <( UJ 0 I- a. N I- a. C/) (/) C) Z C/) U U C/) C/) Z (/) U U C/) C/) UJ Z C/) Z 0 I- UJ i= UJ z C/) 0 I- UJ i= UJ z C/) C/) U 0 0::: <( i= 0 u ..., C/) C/) C/) U 0 0::: i= 0 u ..., C/) (/) C/) U 0 0::: C/) Z z i= :::l 0::: <( UJ <( 0 0::: C) C) Z z i= :::l <( UJ <( 0 0::: C) C) Z z i= :::l W 0 <( <( 0 ...J !::: I- 0::: <( Z 0 <( <( 0 ...J !::: I- 0::: <( z 0 <( <( 0 ...J C/) C/) <( 2 a. a. z <( 2 a. a. z <( :::l i= z 0::: !::: ::c 0::: > 0::: C/) Z z i= 0::: !::: ::c > 0::: en z z i= 0::: !::: ::c > U <( <( U UJ ::c 0 0 :> 0 UJ UJ Z 0::: <( <( U UJ 0 0 :> 0 w w Z 0::: <( <( U UJ 0 C/) !::: 0 UJ ~ 0::: 2 u.. u > > 0::: <( !::: w ~ 2 u.. u > > 0::: <( !::: UJ ~ 2 UJ i= a. UJ C/) i= i= <( S a. UJ C/) i= i= ~ S a. UJ 0::: U U CD UJ UJ Z W ...J S U u iii UJ z UJ ...J U U CD w <( a. <( UJ UJ a. <( UJ UJ a. C) !::: <( Z 0::: UJ 0::: 0::: !::: 0::: 0::: Z C> <( Z 0::: 0::: 0::: !::: 0::: 0::: Z C) <( Z 0::: 0::: UJ I- Z ...J Z ...J u.. Z U I- <( UJ Z U UJ C/) 0 a. a. <( w Z I- <( W U UJ C/) 0 a. a. <( UJ Z I- <( W U ~ 52 0::: Z 0::: 0::: I- 52 0::: Z i= 0::: 0::: l- i: 0::: Z i= ...J 0 C) :::l I- C) ~ C/) III I- 0 C) C> ~ C/) III I- 0 C) 0 0::: :> :::l Z ...J 0 Z 0::: 0::: UJ UJ 0::: ex: 0::: :::l Z 0 z 0::: 0::: UJ UJ 0::: ~ 0::: :::l Z 0 ...J <( 0 ~ <( 0 x <( <( UJ l- I- W <( 0 ~ <( x ~ <( W l- I- UJ <( 0 ex: <( x 3: a. U U 0 0::: > w 0::: a. a. z z > S a. u 0 0::: UJ a. a. z z > S a. U 0 0::: UJ c o o bO '" -' C :::l u.. Z C :::l VI C o '" ..... '" o - C N 0 0) C') ..... lO M ~ lO M lO ~ M Il'l CO CO ..... !;: Il'l ..... CO 0 0 0) Il'l .... 0) .... Il'l N .... Il'l ", 0 lO CO 0) Il'l ..... CO CO CO CO M ..... .... lO Il'l CO. .... M "'0 CO en M ...: ci M <ti ..; M .... ..; 0 0 0) .... Il'l j:: t .... 0 .- ..... ..... LO u:; ..- ..... N LO ~ 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 N Il'l Ol LO N ..- LO 0 C') ..- ..... lO 0. ~ ..- CO ~ LO N ..- ..- LO. M Ql C') ..- ...: m C') N 0 C') V V ..- C') ro V C') V 0 0 0 CO Il'l CO Ol ..... CO N N LO 0 V CO N 0 CO V ..... Cl .... N C;; V ro ..- ..... ro ..... C') CO ~ ..- .... en <( .... .... Ol V V 0 Ol Ol LO ro C') V Ol .... ..... 0 0 C;; M Ol en V CO LO C; Ol N ro 0 LO ro CO :>. CO .... N ro N ..- ro C') V ..- V Il'l :; ..- Ol ..- .... ..- ..- ..- ci .., .... M CO Ol CO C') ro 0 CO C') V N C') C') CO ro N N Il'l LO LO ..- ..... V ro ro 0 ..... ..- .... V N V N 0 lO CD ..... ..- .... 0 CO .... ..- Ol N C') ..- N ro V ~ C .... ..- ro .... .... ..- .... ..- ci ~ .... M .., C') LO LO ..- V ..- ro C') CO 0 V 0 0 N LO ro Il'l CO C') LO V N V LO ..- N LO C') Il'l :>. ..... CO <Xl. 0. N C') .... N. ..... CIS .... 0> ..- ..- ..; :a: .... CO CO CO 0> CO C') ..... C') ro CO N CO CO 0 0 V M N 0 V ..... ..- ..... V .... V ro C') C') ..... ... V. N N ...... N. ..- N N ..... 0. ..- LO ..- ..- ci <( ..- N ..... ..- N ..... LO 0 0 ~ V C') 0 0 V LO N 0 0 0 0> .... ro C') N N ..- V 0 ... ro C') 0> 0. ~- CIS cO ..- .... :a: .... 0> 0 ro 0> ..... ..- N ..- ro ..- V 0 0 0 0 LO Il'l 0> ..- ro ..- N N ..- C') N .a V ..- LO LO ro <.C!. CD ..; lO u.. N LO CO 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... N ..- N N .... CO C ..- .... CIS .., ..... 0 ..- ro ..- 0 0 (0 N ..- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO V N ..... C') LO N Il'l U LO 0> V C') M Ql C'"i .0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..- > 0 Z CO ..- V N ..... ..- N Ol N N 0 0 0 0 C') CO CO ro <0 Ol N ro C') V CO - N N V. LO Il'l U ..- M 0 tIl tIl co tIl Ql tIl Ql 0 Ql J::. Ql J::. U) tIl J::. U J::. U tIl Ql U .E U .E z Ql J::. .E .E 0 J::. U CO CO ii) U .E CO ~ CO V .E ~ ... ~ .. U) tIl CO ... Ql ... Ql 2 ... III CD CO ~ Ql "0 Ql "0 Co CD Ql J::. ~ ... > C > C Co ~ C "0 J::. U ... Ql 0 ~ 0 :) c( C U .E Ql "0 ~ ... :) .E > C C C C C ... Ql Co Z 00 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 Ql "0 ~ Co "0 00 ~ 'iij 'iij ~ .. > C g C ~ ... C C 0. 0. 0 :::l ... ~ CIS CD III III Cl Ql ... ... 0 0 'e .e C E E C "0 "0 "0 Ql tIl tIl ~ CD "0 C l!! > C .ijj 'ijj 0 Ql Ql :0 Ql Ql C > 0 C CIS 0 :) III III "0 "0 'iij "0 "0 ~ :I ~ 0 0 Ql .e 'e <( <( III Ql Ql CIS tIl tIl 'iij 'iij ct: ct: 3: ,r!! ,r!! tIl tIl ,r!! Z >- III III - - .e 1:: 1:: tIl M Ql Ql "0 "0 0. 0. -'" -'" ... -'" -'" 0 0 E 'e :) iij iij <( <( E E "0 U U Ql U U 0. 0. IL C <( > "0 II) II) ... ... Ql Ql CIl CIl Ql CIl II) II) <( "0 Z: CD CIS .!! )( )( .. J::. J::. ix: J::. J::. <( ... 0. 0. 0 :2 ~ ~ :; ~ w w .2 U U U U 0. 0. ... iij z C C :>. C C ct: ct: Ql :) :c 0 0 Cl Cl )( >< C 'Cij 'Cij N 'Cij 'Cij U U J::. ..... ... ... Ql Ql CIS CIS Ql CIS .... 0 ~ u C) C) ct: ct: l- I- m ct: ct: ...J ct: ct: Z Z 0 I- '" C o :;::; ~ Q) C- o .. '" Q) >- rt'l 16 J. 1 ~ 1f~' -0 I- >- ", o co o NO"'" 0.... <D en Il'llOOON.......... OMoMNV~"!. o~ ~r--:~O') .... V V ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I' ~ ~ M V ~ ~ m O.....lO~MNNV MCO -i <ti M N ..; <ti .... ~ .... ..........LOO OlLON 0. V ..- Ql m ~O~[,-NLO~Ot'-.. ~ ;~~~~~ C'"i roC')VLO..- OOl..-C')LO C)..q-~~O<O ::s or- 1'- L{) <( LONOl LOOlOl N ..- ..- ..- .... ~rn~N~~(") roo (0 .... ro .... N N LO C') <D ..- ..... N ..... <D M C') M N LOLOOlOlOlO.........O..-(O.....COOlOOOONlO roC')C')roOl O..-OlNVroC')ro(O ro..... 3~N 80 ~ro~~m l'-~ ~~ , ~~ M CONOlCOLOOCOOl....(OLOroNOlVOOOLOM (ONvLO..... OlC')LOO(ON.....CON N~ QlroC') LOOl LO..... roro..- v..- C')O) c~ ffiLO ~ (")~ ~ N .., COOlOVOlOLO(OLOC')(OO>CO(OOlOOOOlN vvC')roOl .......- NOl ..-COC') ..-..... :>.roN N..- .....N V N ~q ~ ~N ~~ :a: .... o LO (0(0 ... C') ~..- ..-C')(OOroOlC')ro(ONVNLOOOOVlO ~LOO 0<0 a~ ~N~ NN ~N ro..... 0...... r--..m ~ ~ ~N N OlroC')C').....O.....OOOOOLOOVOO..-COIl'l C')N"-Vro C') ..- C') v~ ~t'- (")~ l'- ~~ ~ NC') ...: ..- .... .a V Ql u.. OlV.....VON.....V(O(O..-ONOOOOLOCO ~~ u:;~..-~ LO .....~ ~N ~ LO(ONC')roO(OOOOlOlO ON OlN COC') V I:~ <DCO 'r- or- CIS .., ..-OOOONO.... N ..- ~ o N C')OVOroCO.....OlNNN..-..-OOOOC')OOO o V.....rorovrov N 0) uC') LO~C') C') .... ~ N..- .0 > o z OOOOOOOOOOOOC')OOOOOOM NCO(OOC')OLONVLO..-C')OO..-OVO(OOO C').........00l NN C')..... 000 ~N ~~ N ~ LO~ (J .. M o 0) o m z o Cii m :E c <( z o o C) <( ...J Z ~ u.. Z :Z ~ ~ tIl CIl tIl "5 Q; ~ ~ ,5 "OJ::. Uco C U C ~ :)cco.. "Oco~ ~ C V ... 0 CIS .. Ql tIl CIl "0 .l!l ... > t: c: ~O:)Ql >-~~~ M iij iij Ql gm(J)ct: :Eg-g-~ :c 0 0 0 u<9<9U tIl tIl Ql Ql "5J::. .E g tIl tIl Ql Ql J::. tIl J::. U Qlu.E "5;co .E~~ 00 ... Ql ~ Ql "0 ... > C QlO~ "Occ coo :) 'in 'in g tIl tIl C 'in 'e 'e 0 tIl "0 "0 'in .e <( <( ,r!! "OC1.C1.E ~ ~ ~ ~ cu >< >< ... :; W W ,2 Cl)()(C CIl CIS CIS CIl ct:l-l-m COco ~~ Ql ... > Ql o-g C ~ ,* .l!l III C 'e ~ "0 'iij <(~ .. .!! .. ~~ CIl 0 ct:u tIl tIl Ql Ql J::. J::. U U .E .Eco co~ ~ ... ... Ql Ql "0 > C 0:) C C o 0 ~~ 0.0. E E CIl Ql "0 "0 Ql Ql ct:ct: -'" -'" U U Ql Ql J::. J::. U U C e .iij .iij ct:ct: Co Co~ ~ ... ... Ql Ql "0 > C Cl 0 ~ c"O"O :0 ~ ~ CIS III III 3: .!! .!! ...-",-", CD U U > Ql Ql ix:"5"5 3~~ Co ~Co ... ~ CD ... "0 CD C > :I 0 ~~ o 0 0.0. (J)m o.c.. ct:ct: uu zz s C Ql > W iij .u CD 0. II) "ii c 1Il o g .in 'iij III III III gj .e .e 0. "0 "0 .. <( <( ~ Q; iii g. S ~ J: 0 {!. ro ..... ro o ..... ro OJ >- m V'l u -.::; V'l 0';:; ro ..... V) ..... OJ 0.0 C ro 0::: .. i . . '....1 ! ; l ... ... , w >- I-- a. W (f) C> ::::> <( >- -I ::::> ., ..- lO N ..- CX) f'-.. 0 0 ~ W lO 0 0 ..- ..- C"') N N Z ..- ::::> ., f'-.. (") 0 0 N 0 C"') 0 N ~ ~ CD ..- ..- >- N 0> <( ~ 0 0> f'-.. C"') C"') CX) N 0 0 -I 0> N lO N ..- N ~ C"') [2 ..- a. <( CD f'-.. 0> C"') N f'-.. 0 0 0 ::J: ..- f'-.. CX) U N ..- lO 0:: ..- <( ~ CD 0> N C"') ~ lO 0 0 0 CX) N N ..- m ..- 0> W u.. C"') N CD N f'-.. 0 ..- 0 0 C"') C"') CD N ..- Z N ~ <( ..- ., CX) 0> N CD N 0 0 0 0 V lO f'-.. ..- U ..- CX) W 0 CX) C"') 0 f'-.. N CX) 0 0 0 ..- 0> ..- CX) ..- > ..- N lO 0 ..- Z N CX) CD 0> f'-.. f'-.. lO 0 0 CD 0> ..- CD ..- I-- ..- .,.... (") U N 0 0 or 0 N U Z Z (f) <( I-- I-- a. 0:: en U U en 0 I-- W i= w (f) 0 U ., (f) (f) (f) U 0:: a. w <( 0 0:: C> C> z z ::::> w I-- I-- 0:: <( Z 0 <( 0 0:: en z a. a. z z i= 0:: ::J: 0:: :> 0 w w Z 0:: <( <( W W U > > 0:: <( I-- W ::.:: C> (f) -I i= i= <( ~ U a. m z w <( w w ~ a. <( !::: z 0:: 0:: -I Z C> <( 0:: 0:: (f) 0 a. a. <( w Z I-- W a. ::.:: (f) 0:: 0:: m I-- i: 0:: C> I-- 0:: 0:: 0:: W w 0:: ii:: 0:: ::::> z U <( W I-- I-- W <( 0 <( 3 a. a. z z > ~ a. U 0:: 16 j 1 B .1 , ra +-' ra o ...... ra OJ >- M III U ..;J III ".;J ra +-' VI ...... OJ t:lO c: ra a:: 1611B;l3 co ..... N 10 ...... ..... 0 0 0 0 M O'l '<t 0 '<t ...... '<t 0 10 N (l) M ...... M W W ...... M (l) >- >- N LO 0 0 CD ..... ..... 0 0 0 0 0 CO .,.... ..... C") l- I- .,.... ..... N 0.. 0.. N W W (/) (/) CD V N C") CO C") 0 0 0 0 LO IX) .,.... N C> C> N ::> ::> .,.... <( <( .,.... V ..... 0'> 0'> CD 0 0 0 0 LO C") N 0'> .,.... .,.... >- >- N N ...J ...J ...... ::> ::> ., ., 0 '<t IX) 0'> 0 0 0 ...... LO N IX) 0 C") LO 0 0 0 0 .,.... C") N CO CO V N 0 N W '<t ...... LO W 0'> C") Z Z ...... ::> ::> ., ., 0 ...... '<t N 0 0 0 ..... LO C") LO 0'> CD IX) 0 0 0 0 ...... ...... N C") ..... C") IX) .,.... V ...... >- CD C") N ...... >- ...... 0'> 0'> <( ...... <( ...... == == 0 N 10 N 0 0'> 0 CO V V C") 0 0'> 0 0 0 0 0 ...J ..... ..... CD IX) en ...J 0 0 lO C") CD ...... IX) C") ..... C") M ...... Q) '<t ~ N ~ ...... ...... 0.. 0.. <( <( 0 '<t CD Q) 0 ...... 0 0 LO N '<t CD LO ...... 0 0 0 0 :I: CD '<t ..... '<t M :I: Q) LO N CD C") .,.... 0 ~ C") 0 '<t 10 0 ..... ..... 0:: ...... ...... M 0:: N <( <( == == LO N CD ...... 0 IX) 0 0 LO 0 CO V ...... C") C") Q) al al Q) LO W W ...... u.. u.. CD N ..... '<t ..... ...... 0 0 ...... 0 IX) LO ...... 0 .,.... LO Z Z V LO <( <( ...... ., ., CD 0 CD V Q) V 0 0 LO 0 Q) N ...... C") ...... '<t 0 0 0'> N W W N C C LO CD IX) LO '<t CD 0 0 0 0 LO N .,.... CD IX) > > C") CD 0 0 .,.... Z Z LO IX) CD IX) V N 0 0 C") 0 IX) ...... N LO N N CD l- I- 0 CD 0 0 N co 0 0 0 0.. ~ - w 0:: 0 Z > Z (/) <( (/) 0:: (/) I- 0.. C/) W (/) I- 0 U (/) w (/) (/) (/) 0:: (/) w 0 w w 0 I- i= w (/) 0 W :I: 0 C 0 ., (/) (/) (/) 0 0:: ..... 0 0:: 0 0 0.. W <( 0 0:: C> Z Z ::> 0 <( 0.. <( ~ 0 :I: 0 W I- 0:: <( C> z 0 ...J N 0:: <( 0 <( 0:: I- 0.. Z <( 0 ~ C/) :I: :I: W en Z 0.. - Z ~ 0:: :I: C 0 0 al <( W <( :I: 0:: :> 0 w w Z 0:: <( 0:: W W 0 z m m I- 0.. 0 W 0 ~ > 0:: <( I- W (/) 0 m m C> (/) i= ~ 0.. ~ :iE ::> l- I- ...J ...J l- s: 0 m 0 0 0 m (/) :I: ...J 0 Z W <( W W 0.. W <( (/) < <( t: z C> <( 0:: 0:: 0 0 0:: u.. 0 Z 0:: 0:: ...J 0:: <( u.. u.. W 0.. ...J I- 0:: ...J 0:: (/) 0 0.. 0.. <( W Z I- W 0 Z W W C == ::> 0:: <( <( 0.. ~ (/) 0:: 0:: m l- i: 0:: C> i= I- 0:: 0:: 0:: Z <( C> w :iE I- 0:: 0:: 0:: W W 0:: ~ 0:: ::> z 0 ::> <( <( <( ...J C> 0 0 <( W l- I- W <( 0 <( >< ?- m m > 0 z i= en I- z 0.. 0.. Z Z > s: 0.. 0 0:: W - - O'l ...... ..... M en O'l ..... 0 .... 0 M co (l) M 0 co M 10 ...... 10 ...... 0 M '<t W .,.... M (l) >- N ...... IX) v CD IX) ...... N 0 0 0 I- 0 C") 0 ...... ...... .,.... 0.. .,.... W (/) IX) N .,.... Q) IX) C") ...... 0 C") 0 LO IX) N N N C> 0 ::> .,.... <( IX) 0 v IX) ...... 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 N Q) >- C") ...... ...J ...... ::> ., IX) IX) '<t V IX) CD N 0 0 0 w CD ...... N ...... .,.... ...... N IX) .,.... z ...... ::> ., IX) CD C") IX) LO 0 ...... 0 ...... 0 ...... IX) C") IX) N .,.... LO >- ...... CD .,.... <( .,.... ...... == CD CD V CD CD N N 0 0 0 ...J C") V C") V C") ...... ...... 0 C") ~ N ...... 0.. <( IX) .,.... V LO LO 0 N 0 0 0 :I: ...... ...... N ...... .,.... ...... 0 0 ...... v 0 .,.... 0:: N .,.... <( == v Q) v C") C") N N 0 N 0 0 C") ...... v ...... N ...... v al ...... ...... C") w C") u.. ...... C") N V ...... 0 C") 0 0 0 CD CD .,.... C") C") N Z C") N <( N ., Q) ...... LO Q) 0 0'> 0 0 LO 0 IX) ...... N N ...... 0 C") N W N C LO N ...... N V 0 0 0 0 0 Q) C") LO N ...... > CD N 0 ...... z C") LO LO Q) V 0 0 0 0 0 CD C") v I- Q) N 0 ...... en 0 0 0.. 0:: 0 Z Z (/) <( l- I- 0.. 0:: (/) 0 0 (/) 0 I- W i= w (/) c 0 ., (/) (/) (/) 0 0:: 0.. W <( 0 0:: C> C> z z ::> w I- 0:: <( Z 0 ...J 0:: en I- 0.. 0.. Z <( 0 ~ z z i= 0:: :I: 0:: :> 0 w w Z 0:: <( <( w 0 w 0 ~ > 0:: <( I- W <( ~ == C> (/) ...J I- i= s: 0 0.. m z w <( w w s: 0.. W ~ I- Z 0:: 0:: ...J Z C> <( 0:: 0:: en 0 0.. 0.. <( W Z I- W ~ 0:: 0:: l- i: 0:: C> 0.. ~ (/) al l- I- 0:: 0:: 0:: W W 0:: ~ 0:: ::> z 0 0 <( W l- I- W <( 0 <( >< ~ 0.. 0.. Z Z > s: 0.. 0 0:: W 2 eo o L- eo (I) >- M Vl u ''-:; Vl :;:; eo ..... V'l L- (I) tl.O C eo 0::: ,.\ BJ3 61 . '...' 1 . CD ...... N 10 en 0 0 co 0 en "" N "" " co CD en " M ...... M "" 0 "" ...... co " CD ...... N en M ...... 10 co ~ N ...... 10 co N en ...... N M ...... ...... M W 0 N N CD N w >- N " >- 0 ...... U") 0 0 0 U") C') 0 " "" t-- co ...... C') U") ...... U") co ...... N I- (!) "" ...... C') en N ...... I- ...... N co ...... C') ...... a. ...... C') a. w w C/) (/) (!) 0 '<t (!) C') 0 N U") (!) U") C') N N U") N C') N C') 0 ...... C') en ...... co N N '<t ...... N C) LO. co '<t ...... C) :> ...... '<t :> c:{ c:{ C') 0 '<t co U") 0 LO ...... (!) ...... '<t t-- ...... C') C') LO '<t t-- co ...... (!) C') N C') C') N co ...... N >- '<to N.. N C') ...... >- ...J ...... U") ...J :> :> ., ., N 0 N U") U") 0 co ...... N co N N N ...... N 0 (!) ...... co en (!) C') co C') LO ...... N 0 ...... "" (!) ...... 0 en ...... N '<t ...... en ...... LO '<t U") t-- N ...... ...... N W en 0 N '<t ...... W co N t-- ...... Z ...... (!) z ...... (!) :> :> ., ., C') 0 N (!) 0 0 N co '<t en ...... 0 N en '<t '<t 0 ...... LO t-- t-- (!) t-- '<t N C') '<t N N en ...... N ...... co C') N ...... (!) C') LO ...... ...... co t-- ...... co LO (!) (!) N >- LO. LO (!) (!) ...... >- en co co ...... c:{ ...... (!) c:{ ...... (!) ::!: ::!: en 0 C') 0 N 0 0 U") 0 co en (!) '<t LO LO C') N N ...... LO co N (!) (!) N '<t '<t '<t t-- N ...... ...J 0 C') N en 0 C') 0 ...... ...J (!) C') ...... C') co en (!) ...... N co LO N " N 0 N ...... en ...... ~ ...... t-- ~ N en a. a. c:{ c:{ '<t 0 N 0 0 0 co en 0 C') N ...... U") en U") N ...... N U") t-- en 0 '<t ...... LO ...... 0 0 '<t '<t U") ...... :I: " en C') C') N N t-- N N :I: '<t C') N C') ...... (!) co ...... ...... C') u co t-- C') (!) N U co co C') en N ~ ...... " ~ ...... co c:{ c:{ ::!: ::!: t-- 0 '<t N 0 ...... N C') co en co en en C') " 0 N 0 '<t en en en ...... co ...... C') en U") en ...... ...... C') ...... N t-- C') ...... ...... ...... ...... 0 0 N 0 t-- N ...... N aJ " ~ N U") N aJ '<to co C') N ...... W ...... (!) w ...... '<t U. U. '<t 0 ...... co 0 t-- " en ...... en t-- (!) LO N ...... '<t C') (!) '<t en t-- 0 ...... C') 0 '<t 0 '<t N co " C') t-- t-- ...... " N ...... C') '<t N (!) (!) C') C') ...... N Z 0 en C') LO N Z (!) en N '<t ...... c:{ N (!) c:{ ...... '<t ., ., N 0 0 N 0 N ...... N (!) N 0 C') t-- N '<t N N t-- C') U") C') (!) co ...... 0 ...... ...... U") (!) ...... U") 0 0 ...... en LO ...... C') ...... ...... ...... U") t-- ...... C') ...... ...... ...... N U co N '<t N U N C') ...... N ...... W ...... (!) w ...... '<t e e en 0 ...... '<t 0 C') N '<t ...... en C') U") en '<t U") en C') 0 ...... (!) (!) N 0 '<t N LO en t-- co ...... ...... (!) 0 N '<t '<t ...... t-- N t-- LO ...... (!) t-- ...... ...... N > (!) U") ...... '<t N > ...... ...... ...... N ...... 0 ...... LO 0 ...... ~ z Z t-- 0 '<t en 0 t-- '<t '<t N 0 en t-- '<t C') " en (!) C') LO C') (!) C') t-- N ...... 0 en N (!) N 0 (!) N LO ...... 0 ...... ...... ...... '<t (!) ...... t-- co C') ...... ...... I- co (!) ...... U") ...... I- C') N N ...... U ...... LO U ...... C') 0 0 0 Ii:: z ...... Z en C/) c:{ 0 C/) c:{ w 0 I- a. N I- a. C/) C/) C) z C/) u u C/) C/) z C/) U U C/) C/) w z C/) z 0 I- W i= w z C/) 0 I- W i= w z C/) C/) u 0 ~ c:{ i= e u ., C/) (/) C/) u 0 (t: i= Cl u ., C/) (/) C/) u 0 (t: C/) z z i= :> ~ c:{ w c:{ 0 ~ C) C) z z i= :> c:{ w c:{ 0 ~ C) C) z z i= :> w 0 c:{ c:{ 0 ...J l- I- ~ c:{ z 0 c:{ c:{ 0 ...J t: I- ~ c:{ z 0 c:{ c:{ 0 ...J C/) C/) c:{ ::!: a. a. z c:{ ::!: a. a. z c:{ :> i= (t: t: :I: ~ > ~ e;; z z i= (t: t: :I: > (t: C/) z z i= (t: t: :I: > U c:{ Z c:{ 0 w w z ~ c:{ c:{ :> 0 w w z ~ c:{ c:{ 0 u W :I: 0 0 :> ~ u w 0 0 ~ u w 0 C/) t: w ~ ~ ::!: u. U > > c:{ t: w ~ ::!: u. u > > c:{ t: w ~ ::!: w i= a. w C/) i= i= c:{ s: a. w C/) i= i= c:{ s: a. w ~ U u in w w z W ...J s: U a. U in w z W ...J s: U a. U in w c:{ a. c:{ w w c:{ w w C) t: c:{ z ~ w ~ ~ I- ~ ~ z C) c:{ z ~ (t: ~ t: ~ ~ z C) c:{ z (t: (t: w z c:{ l- e;; Z ...J W Z c:{ C/) Z ...J W Z c:{ u. U I- W Z U W 0 a. a. c:{ I- W U W 0 a. a. c:{ I- W u :J i: (t: z C) i= C) ~ ~ l- i: ~ z C) i= C) ~ ~ ~ l- i: ~ z C) i= ...J e :> ~ C/) aJ l- e C/) aJ l- e e ~ :> z ...J 0 Z ~ (t: w w ~ ~ :> z 0 z ~ ~ w w ~ ~ :> z 0 ~ ~ l- I- ~ ~ l- I- ~ ~ ...J c:{ 0 c:{ 0 x c:{ c:{ w w c:{ 0 c:{ x ~ c:{ w w c:{ 0 c:{ x ~ a. U U 0 ~ > w ~ a. a. z z > s: a. U 0 ~ w a. a. z z > s: a. U 0 ~ w ro .... ro o ..... ro Q) >- M lI'I U ~ V'l ',j:; ro .... VI ..... Q) till C ro a: f' ..... 10 ..... N en co V N to 10 N 0 10 co to N 10 co W U; ..... M N r-: ci >- v to 10 M 0 N M 0) V 0 N co I- 0 v v 0 N ..... l"- N ...... N V I"- Q. M M V LO to W ..... C/) 0) 0) co 0 0 to V N V 0 co 0 C> LO ...... I"- 0) V co ::l M M M ...... N <t ..... co l"- I"- N V co co N V N to V >- ...... 0) M LO_ LO 10 ....I -<i -<i LO N I"- ::l ..... .., v co co N M 10 W ...... N N I"- co N N 0) M 1"-_ N 10 Z -<i LO M N to ::l ..... .., v 0 co 0 to co 0 ...... to ...... LO V ~ V V_ V_ V_ v ..... -<i to V M en ~ ..... l"- V to M to to ....I co co M ...... N V M ~ M V_ to to it: -<i I"- to M N Q. N <t to to LO N N ..... :I: 0 0) M N co V 0 to ?"- M_ 0 V N 0::: -<i LO LO ri en <t ..... ~ co to l"- N 0 M ...... N M LO M to III co 0)_ ~ I"- LO M_ W N N V ...... N lL. ..... V 0 V N 0 0 I"- 0 LO N to ..... Z v N.. to_ LO to ~ <t -<i l"- V N en .., ..... co N co co ...... I"- to M to 0) ...... I"- 0 N N <J:!. 0 ...... "'!. w ri .0 v N ...... to 0 ..... N N co V 0 to to to to I"- co V > l"- I"- l"- I"- 0 ..... 0 N -<i M ...... ...... ..,f Z ..... co N co I"- LO 0 to co N to M co I- ...... M N_ co co V_ 0 ri -<i M ...... M 0 ..... co 0 t:: C/) 0 W C/) :I: 0::: () w z C/) 0 ::l ::l 0::: <t J: 0 ....I () lL. I- Z C/) lL. <t ::l := <t <t 0 ~ III 0::: III W ~ ..... I- ....I ~ :> ~ 0 10 W <t >- () en ~ I- 0 <( 0 0::: <( 0 III III () () C/) ....I I- 16 :j 1 Bi3 ?"- M 0 ..... 10 ..... V to 10 N en ..... I"- 10 N en N v W w M oi N r-: >- >- N co N M to to ...... 0 I- ...... N ...... M ...... N I- ...... 0) ...... V Q. 0.. N -<i w w C/) (f) co co 0 0 to N 0 N ...... N to ...... e> e> 0_ to_ ...... LO ::l :J N LO <t <t ...... M ...... to N ...... 0) co ...... co LO N >- >- co N.. LO ....I ....I ...... to ::l :J .., .., V M co N to 0) N 0) LO to I"- 0 I"- to to N 0 0 LO N W 0 0 ..... LO 0) N W v_ 0 ...... ...... v co 0 ...... M LO LO Z ...... v V N M Z N cD ::l ..... :J .., .., LO to l"- V LO l"- V 0) 0 LO M M 0) l"- V V ...... LO co N I"- ...... ...... l"- V V >- 0) M ...... N M q ..... >- 0) 0 I"- <t ...... v -<i M ...... .n <t ...... co ~ ..... ~ ...... I"- co 0) co co ..... LO N V I"- 0 I"- ....I LO l"- V ...... LO co V ....I M 0 V V co M it: M I"- ~ v_ v ...... q it: co_ O) to V ...... LO ...... N ...... M ...... co Q. ..... Q. <t <t v ...... M ...... 0) LO M V N co ...... l"- I"- :I: 0) ...... 0 ...... LO LO M :I: LO ...... M to ...... N () N <q, l"- v_ M co N () ...... co M 0) 0::: ...... LO ...... ci 0::: N ci <( ..... <t ...... ~ ~ I"- lJ'l co 0 1.O lJ'l .-1 N LO 0) N to M M V 0 M M lJ'l .-1 0 to N co M M III co co I"- 00 rl V co III 0) v_ N I"- W M to W ...... co lL. lL. N LO 0) M 0) N 0 0) l"- N co to to to I"- co ...... LO M M V co N 0 0 ...... Z LO ?"- M ...... ...... LO 10 Z ...... N_ N LO <( M U; <( N I"- .., .., I"- LO N I"- 0) V V M N l"- V 0) I"- 0) LO V LO 0) ...... to M LO ...... 0 ...... M () q to co N ...... l"- I"- () co V_ ...... to W ...... M ~ W ...... I"- 0 0 v 0) 0) LO LO N M co I"- co N M M 0 N -0 to 0 V V M ...... V 0) I"- > 1"-_ LO_ 0) Q) M 0 10 > 1"-_ ...... N LO 0 N M en ...... oi 0 ...... I"- Z 0 Z U v to co N N N N co LO 0) M 0) 0) v 00 -0 0 0 M M LO ...... 0) co LO I- LO ...... ...... Q) (") N_ V I- a M LO () ...... cr) ...... en ...... r-: () N I"- 0 0 0 u 0 z ..... co C/) <( 0 C/) 0 I- Q. N C/) W Z C/) () () C/) 0 :I: 0 I- W i= 0::: Z () ~ 0 () .., C/) C/) w <t z w <t 0 0::: C> C> C/) ::l !:: I- 0::: <t z ::l 0 ....I ~ Q. Q. Z 0::: !{l ~ 0::: C/) Z Z Z :I: 0 0 :> 0 w W 0::: () W I- () ~ > 0::: <t z lL. :I: <t lL. C/) i= <t := C/) lL. Z ....I I- ::l <t <( I- 0 W <( W w := <( := III 0::: lL. III 0::: I- 0::: 0::: Z en Z ....I ....I W ::E I- 0 ....I W 0 Q. Q. <( W s;: 0 ..... 0::: 0::: l- I- <t 10 W I- <t C> ~ C/) III I- <t >- >< () en ~ 0::: I- Z 0::: 0::: W w 0::: it: 0 <( <( 0 0::: <( 0 0 <( <( W l- I- W III a:l () () C/) ....I Q. I- 0::: Q. Q. Z Z > := - en M N ...... M to V V co to to to I"- en M co ..... ~ 0 co 1"-_ W I"- en r-: I"- r-: N ..... >- N V N ..... M ..... V I"- ...... to 0) V ..... LO to LO co 0) v 0 I- to a (") M LO I"- co Q. ...... M ...... r-: w C/) to to LO I"- ...... to ..... N I"- to V 0 LO l"- e> v N M LO I"- LO co~ ::l ...... M ...... I"- <t N 0 to M LO LO ..... N V co 00 N M en >- 00 co 0) v_ to ...... co ....I ...... M ...... oi ::l .., LO V co 0) 0) 0 10 0) ...... LO (") 0) ...... ..... W o_ N_ 0 to V ...... "'!. z N M ri ...... 0 ::l ..... .., 00 0 0) ...... co to N (") N 0) 0) 0) N I"- >- LO 0_ 0 ...... to N I"- <( ...... v -<i N N ~ ..... l"- N V V to LO co ....I 0 V ...... LO to to V v_ LO co N LO N co it: N LO ...... N N Q. ..... <t LO to co to N 0 I"- :I: ...... 0 0 0 N LO 0 () LO co LO 0 M N V 0::: N to N N ..,f <t ..... ~ M 0 I"- ...... to N en ...... N co to to co N III co LO LO (") LO N ..... W N LO N ...... M lL. ...... I"- 0 0 v (") 00 N M V M LO N 0 en Z v_ I"-_ N.. 1"-_ to M 0 <t M V M ...... ..,f .., ..... v ...... LO N LO I"- LO ...... N LO LO en () ...... co <q, v_ 0) en W M M ...... ...... ci 0 ..... l"- N (") N 0) M M LO N M to ..... > 00 LO 1"-_ M LO 0 0 N M ...... ...... ci z ..... ...... LO to to 0 co LO 0) ...... LO V 10 I- to_ v_ co_ o M M () ...... N N ...... co 0 en 0 co C/) 0 C/) W C/) 0 :I: 0::: Z () w <t z C/) 0 ....I :J ::l 0::: !{l <t :I: 0 ....I () W l- lL. :I: Z C/) lL. <( ::l <t <( I- 0 ~ := III 0::: lL. III W ~ ..... I- 0 ....I l- s;: <( 0 10 W I- <( <( >- >< () en ~ 0::: I- 0 <( <( 0 0::: <( 0 0 III III () () C/) ....I Q. I- C1J +-' C1J o "- C1J OJ >- m V'l u +-' V'l +-' C1J Vi "- OJ ao c C1J a:: --, 4. - en ..... <D r-- 10 N en ..... 0 ..... N M Cl) 0 r-- '<t <D 10 Cl) ..... '<t 10 ..... 0 0 en ..... w .,f <.D N Cl) r-- .0 M N 0 >- '<t 0 en ..... 10 10 ..... 10 '<t N ..... M en (0 N 1.0 '<t C0 (0 N a Cl) l- I'- (") (") '<t N '<t 0) a M '<to a '<to ...--. a a '<to C0 ~ ll. ..-- 0) '<t ..-- N '<t C0 0) N W ..-- '<t CJ) 1.0 '<t '<t I'- a a N 0> ..... N (0 0> '<t '<t ..-- I'- 0> 10 C> I'- 0> ~ 0) 0) C0 I'- (0. Cl) :J ..-- ai '<t (") (") 1.0 N N <l: N It) 0) a a C0 I'- a '<t ..-- M a I'- (0 1.0 C0 (0 I'- 1.0 ..... >- 1.0 N I'- C0. 1.0 ..-- 1.0 I'- ~ ...J N c0 N ...-- 1.0 0> ..-- I'- M :J ..-- N <D ..., I'- 1.0 I'- 0) ..-- I'- ..-- 0) '<t W ..-- a N '<t N 0) 0> I'- r-- 1.0 '<t a 0). 1.0 C0 N.. 1.0 It) Z N N '<t ...-- '<t '<t I'- I'- .,f :J ..-- N <D ..., ..-- N 0) 1.0 ..-- (0 0) 1.0 <D Cl) 0> '<t 0> N 0> 1.0 1.0 '<t >- 1.0 N ..-- 1'-. 0) C0 '<to '<to en <l: C0 I'- C0 ..-- '<t (0 0> Cl) .,f :2: ..-- C0 Cl) I'- 0> '<t Cl) (0 ..-- 0) a M ...J 0) ..-- 0) (0 a 0) (0 0) en ii: (0. N co N '<to 1.0 1.0 N <D I'- 0) 0) N (0 N '<t ..-- ..... ll. N ..-- ..-- '<t N <l: ..... a N 1.0 0) 1.0 a 0> N ..... J: C0 (0 0> 0> ..-- '<t '<t a en U 1.0 C0 0) 1'-. co ..-- a I'- ~ ~ 0) a5 0) ...-- I'- 0) N co N <l: (") ..-- N '<t It) :2: ..... ..-- a N ...-- C0 C0 (0 0> It) 0> 0> co I'- '<t N a N ..... lD 0> I'- ..-- '<to C0 1.0 '<to N.. en w co ci r-: ..-- co N 0) a M u. C0 ..-- ..-- '<t N ..... 0> N 0) I'- a 0> a 0> '<t 0> N ..-- I'- 0> a 1.0 0) It) z 0) (0 C0 1.0. 0> (0 I'- 1.0 M <l: N .n 0) ...-- '<t 1.0 I'- 1.0 N ..., ..-- N r-- 0) 0> '<t co 1.0 N I'- 0> 0 0> N '<t I'- I'- 1.0 ..-- 0) Cl) U '<to ..-- I'- '<to C0 0) 0) a en w N .,f (") ...-- '<t ..-- a I'- .0 c ..-- ...-- N <D 1.0 N '<t co a 0) 0) ..-- '<t 1.0 N co I'- '<t N 1.0 0> M > C0 a N ...--. 0) N a co <D. 0 N N M ...-- (") C0 I'- 0) ..... Z ..-- ..-- It) N '<t 1.0 '<t '<t a '<t 0) ..... 1.0 ..-- a C0 0> '<t N 0> <D I- a a C0 0). I'- 0) 0) 1.0 N U N cD (") ...-- N C0 '<t 0) M 0 ..-- '<t W CJ) > Cl) CJ) ~ ~ 0 CJ) W W >- W CJ) CJ) u. U W :J CJ) U ~ w J: a:: <l: ll. ~ I- U w l- I- CJ) 0 0 ...J <l: CJ) 0 0 CJ) J: ...J ffi w :J <l: CJ) u <( 0 0 ~ Z ~ lD J: u. U. ll. U. <l: w I- W ...J U W w :2: ...J C 0::: C <l: <l: 0::: 0::: <l: :J :2: C> w Z I- W <l: <l: ...J C> 0 :J C> <l: 0 lD lD lD U z CJ) CJ) i= > I- .L It) It) '<t r-- M r-- en N N It) '<t en '<t en Cl) 0 <D en '<t M ~ Cl) ..... 0 <t!. "": 0 w .,f M Cl) .0 cO .0 <D co Cl) >- '<t M ..... ..... It) r-- ..... M en N ..... ..... M en I'- '<t 0> I'- co 0) 0) '<t M 1.0 0) 0> I'- N 0) C0 ..-- Cl) l- I'-. '<to I'- co 0> 0> C0 0> Cl) ll. ..-- ..-- C0 N C0 C0 0) co W ..-- ..-- '<t CJ) C0 co a a I'- N 0) a co 0) C0 1.0 ..-- ..-- 0> ..-- 0) Cl) C> 0> N.. 0> co ..-- ...-- co. N. en :J N (") co ..-- lCi cD 1.0 co r-- <l: ..-- N co N 0) ..-- '<t 0> a N N Cl) 1.0 C0 ..-- '<t co 0> co I'- M >- co. C0 ..-- I'- N co. '<to I'- o. ...J N '<t r-: co I'- I'- 0> co :J ..-- N r-- ..., '<t N a co 0) a N (") It) C0 1.0 1.0 a '<t 1.0 I'- ..-- N W '<to '<to co a 1.0 I'- C0 C0 10 Z N C0 co ..-- '<t I'- co 0) 0 :J ..-- N r-- ..., (") '<t I'- '<t I'- '<t 0> 1.0 M C0 a C0 a 1.0 a 0> I'- ..... >- 0) N N C0 a 1.0 0> co. Cl) <l: C0 0) 0> N 1.0 I'- I'- '<t cO :2: ..-- C0 Cl) 0> ..-- ..-- co N 1.0 0> 0) ..... ...J 1.0 C0 0) a I'- 1.0 N 1.0 en ii: ..-- ..-- N.. a '<to I'- N '<to '<to I'- N 0) ..-- co I'- co N ..... ll. C0 ..-- ..-- '<t M <l: ..... ..-- I'- a 0) 0) ..-- 0) co en J: 1.0 0) 0> N I'- 1.0 ..-- a 0 U I'- 1.0 0> ..-- a co 0> I'- Cl) 0::: (0 0) a ..-- I'- I'- 0> C0 .0 <l: C0 N ..-- '<t '<t :2: ..... N N a '<t a 1.0 1.0 1.0 M 1.0 0) ..-- a 0) N '<t N N lD C0 a N ..-- 1.0 '<to I'- co ..... W 1.0 a I'- ..-- 1.0 co co ..-- .,f u. C0 ..-- ..-- C0 ..... ..... C0 a N (") 0) a 0> a It) N 1.0 a co (") N 0) '<t N Z ..-- '<to 1.0 0> a a I'- I'- co <l: .,f N C0 ..-- 1.0 1.0 ..-- 1.0 en ..., N ..-- ..-- N Cl) a a N N I'- a I'- I'- It) '<t 1.0 '<t (0 0> '<t I'- 0) en U N.. 0) 1.0 '<to co. Cl) (") a 0 w C0 (0 1.0 ..-- C0 C0 0> 0> M c ..-- ..-- co 0> ..-- I'- I'- 1.0 0) 0> 1.0 ..... 0) '<t 0) C0 0) C0 C0 (0 Cl) > 1.0 C0 0) '<t '<to C0 a co r--:. 0 N C0 1.0 ..-- (") co I'- 0) Cl) Z ..-- ..-- It) N a 1.0 (0 (0 '<t C0 I'- M 0) 0> C0 a N C0 N N N I- 1.0 ..-- 0> '<t 0> 0> I'- N. en U ..-- 0> N ..-- N '<t '<t I'- .,f 0 ..-- '<t W CJ) > en CJ) ~ a:: 0 CJ) w w >- w CJ) CJ) u. U W :J CJ) U 0::: w J: a:: <l: ll. 0::: I- U w l- I- CJ) 0 ...J <l: CJ) 0 0 CJ) J: 0 ...J ffi w :J <l: CJ) u <( 0 0 0::: z 0::: lD J: u. U. ll. U. W I- W ...J <l: a:: ...J U W w :2: c c <l: <l: a:: 0::: <l: :J :2: C> w Z I- w <l: <l: ...J C> 0 :J C> ~ 0 lD lD lD U Z CJ) CJ) i= I- 61 1 1 "-1 B 3 w >- l- ll. W CJ) C> :J <l: >- ...J :J ..., 1.0 a ..-- co N 0) ..-- N N r-- a co C0 co C0 C0 N (") 1.0 M W I'- 1.0 0). co. (0 I'- a. 1.0 N en Z N C0 '<t ..-- '<t 0) 1.0 C0 ..-- .0 :J ..-- N co ..., 0) co N co 0> 1.0 co 0) '<t '<t ..-- '<t '<t 0) 0> a '<t I'- N ~. >- 0> ..-- C0 '<to 1.0 0> 0) 1.0 ~ <l: '<t r-: I'- N 1.0 ai I'- 1.0 ..-- N :2: ..-- C0 en '<t ..-- co I'- 0) 0> '<t 0) '<t ..... ...J 1.0 1.0 0> 0> 1.0 a (") I'- a Cl) ..-- '<to 1.0 C0 a ..-- 0> co (") <D ii: r-: a co N co r-: C0 ..-- co ..... ll. C0 ..-- ..-- '<t M <l: ..... '<t C0 co C0 I'- I'- a 0) 1.0 M J: ..-- C0 0) co 0> '<t 1.0 (") co en U C0 N.. '<to (0. 1.0 C0 '<to 0) 0) r--:. 0::: 1.0 ..-- I'- ..-- 1.0 a5 co '<t 0) en <l: (") ..-- ..-- C0 N :2: ..... 0) a ..-- a 1.0 '<t a (0 '<t co N C0 (0 a 1.0 '<t 0) co lD N.. C0 ..--. 0> (0. ..-- N ..-- Cl) W N 0> ..-- (") N N I'- a5 u. ..-- ..-- ..-- ..-- ..-- r-- '<t ..-- N 0> 1.0 N a co en a co N '<t ..-- co '<t I'- N Z C0 C0 I'- C0 '<to 0> (0 N. ~ <l: N co 0> ...-- C0 .n 0) 0) co ..., ..-- ..-- co '<t a N a a a I'- N It) N a N I'- 0> 0) 1.0 1.0 en U 1.0 '<to co. 0> I'- 0> a ..-- "": w ..-- '<t co C0 .,f 0) 0) Cl) C ..-- N co 0> a 0) '<t ..-- 1.0 a 0) It) '<t 1.0 I'- co a '<t I'- (") en > ~ a 0) 0) a N a 0) It) 0 N 1.0 1.0 '<t cD (0 N M z ..-- N co a '<t 0) '<t 0> a '<t C0 N 0) N co 0> '<t C0 1.0 N N I- 1.0 '<to ..-- '<t '<to I'- '<to N.. ~ U N ..-- ..t C0 cD '<t '<t r-- 0 ..-- N It) 0 w CJ) .... > 0 CJ) 0::: III a:: N ... W CJ) W 0 >- w CJ) +' CJ) U. U W '(jj :J CJ) U 0::: W :> J: a:: <l: ll. 0::: I- U 0 Q) W l- I- CJ) 0 ...J .:0:: <l: CJ) 0 0 CJ) J: ...J ffi iii w :J <l: CJ) u <( 0 0 0::: z a:: ~ lD J: u. U. ll. U. <l: w I- W ...J U W w :2: ...J C a:: C Q) <l: <l: 0::: 0::: <l: :J :2: C> w Z .:0:: I- w <l: <l: ...J C> 0 :J C> <l: n; 0 lD lD lD U z CJ) CJ) i= > 3: I- N Ql l>O ro c... 16 f~!lBI3 '" o ...... "Vi :> ~ .... ro c... IX) <") IX) 0 ~ IX) co ..... <") N I"- '<t 0 <") co C") N 0 IX) I{) IX) N O"l C") '<i N m <") I!'i '<t rl .0- N <") ~ N I"- ..... I{) <") IX) IX) l"- ll) ll) to- IX) ~ ~ ~ IX) 0 0 N to 0 I{) ~ m ll) N 0 '<t ci eD '<i N '<t rl r.: N <") <") ~ rl CO ..... m 0 '<t I"- <") N ~ en I{) 0 N CO 0 ~ I{) 0 N 0 '<t CO_ O 0 '<t to- eD eD ci ~ '<i r-: N u5 N N <") ~ ~ CO ..... '<t 0 to CO CO IX) I{) 'Of IX) 0 I"- '<t m 0 to II) CO 0 CO N m I{) m II) CO '<i ci N to eD N 0 <") <") N ~ en ..... CO 0 rl 0 0 CO N en m 0 O"l l"- N 'Of N CO to 0 rl ~ I{) '<t_ ~ ..... m '<i '<t- I!'i IX) ~ I{) a) <") rl ~ ~ II) ..... to CO 'Of I{) CO m 0 CD <") I"- <") ...... IX) to ~ 0 N I{) '<t_ ?"- m m CD ci I!'i l"- I{) I!'i N r.: ~ N ~ ~ ~ 'Of ..... <") N N IX) <") ~ 'Of <") l"- N ~ '<t I{) II) N N m '<t I"- <") CO ro '<i ro c<i I!'i I!'i a) ~ ~ ~ 'Of ..... ~ N 0 '<t <") ~ 'Of 0 I{) m I"- '<t ~ en 0 ~ ~ I{) I"- '<t N ro ci c<i I!'i I!'i r.: ~ ~ ~ ~ N ...... m 0 IX) 0 ~ to 'Of 0 <") N m IX) <") CO N <") to m 1"-. I{) to- I"- I!'i r-: to ~ '<i ..t N ~ ~ II) ..... c en 0 n: 0 Ol 0 ro I- -l in c X ::J :> Q) u. ~ ~ 0:: z ~ n: U c a.. <( Q) ::J E ll. 0:: en ..J 0 ll. ll. ll. a.. a.. a.. -0 <( () () () 0:: 0:: 0:: Q) ?- m 5; ~ () () () ~ 0 a.. z z z U. I- ro ...... ro o ro c o "<:; ro .... Ql C. o .... ro Ql >- m rl <!J tlJ) '" 0.. 16 ~~.J. B 13 ~ o ... "v; :> -t '" 0.. . . M M ;I. 00 I~ <D IX) In IX)" en ..... M M 10 <D 10 to '<t ...... 0 ~ co M IX) IX) M 10 ...... r-. 10 '<t IX) IX) M '<t ...... CI co N 10 to N 0 co M 0 en ...... ...... co M r-. M r-. '<t ~ N <D ..... '<t <D. co IX) en r-. ...... en 10. C!. M N '<t en 0 to. N. <L!. N to ..... ...... r-. UJ c:i ...... M .0 M N ...... to c:i M M ai m ...... UJ en r-: ~ N ~ .0 r-. ...... r-. ai N ~ .0 m UJ >- ...... ..... ...... ...... '<t IX) ..., to co a ..... '<t '<t ...... >- co M r-. 10 ...... a N r-. to co ...... r-. '<t 10 >- ...... ...... ...... N ...... N ...... N ...... ...... ~ ...... N ...... ...... ...... N N ...... ...... co. ...... ...... co 0 N LO 0 0) ~ <.D C') I'-- ~ 0) ...... co <.D (D ~ N 0) co 0) (D LO N N LO 0) M N (D 0) LO I'-- LO ~ ~ C') 0) 0) 0) N en C') (D C') N C') C') ~ N 0) 0 N I'-- 0) a I- 0) ~. C') co ...... <.D C') N N 0 ...... 0) C') co I- ...... 0) LO LO I'-- co 0) LO co 0 C') N 0 ~ I- 0. C') 0 I'-- 0) '<i LO (D LO ~ co '<i 0) (D .0 0. ~ 0 C') 0) LO r-.:- LO l!i I'-- 0) N 0) LO to 0. UJ ...... ...... N ...... N UJ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... UJ (/) ...... (/) ...... (/) 0) N 0 0) I'-- I'-- ...... 0 C') ...... I'-- LO LO a 0) N 0 co LO co ...... ...... N LO (D LO (D co LO I'-- N co LO LO (D co (D 0 ~ 0) I'-- to ...... LO (D 0) (D C') 0) N N ~ (D N I'-- r-. ~ co ~ C') N (D ...... ~. LO C') N 0) 0) co co ~ ...... 0 ~. 0) co co <.D ...... ~. 0 0 ...... co to 0 ::> ~ l!i LO I'-- I'-- l!i (D C') (D C') '<i 0) 0) m ::> cO 05 co cO I'-- (D '<i (D c0 <.D l!i N N :) ~ ...... ...... ...... ...... 10 ~ ...... ...... ...... ...... N M ~ ...... ...... <.D co LO ~ N (D (D N ...... C') <.D 0) C') ...... 0) I'-- co N 0 co ...... ...... 0) 0 ...... 0) (D ...... ...... co ...... 0 LO ~ N 0) co C') 0 N co r-. LO LO 0 C') ~ I'-- ...... ...... 0) LO co 0 I'-- ...... >- ...... 0) (D 0) co LO C') ~ LO ~. co. LO LO r-. >- co C') (D. N (D ~ 0) LO 0) C') LO ...... 0) <L!. >- -I cO M -I 0) l!i '<i . cO ~ l!i -I I'-- ~ LO I'-- 0 0 <.D LO N ...... C') 0 co N N ...... ~ N N ...... ::> N ...... ...... ...... N ...... C') <D ::> N ...... ...... ...... ...... N ...... C') co ::> , ...... , ...... , C') co (D ...... I'-- ~ C') ...... N ...... C') (D LO a ...... 0) 0 <.D ~ co ...... ...... ...... N co ~ C') co C') 0) 0 ~ C') ~ N LO C') 0) 0) ~ C') C') co <.D (D co ...... (D to 0) N 0) LO N N ...... I'-- 0 (D ...... ...... ~ M N 0) C') I'-- ...... 0 co UJ LO N (D 0) 0) LO co I'-- N 0 0 N ~ to UJ ~. (D C') co C'). (D 0). co ~. C') N 0 0) a UJ LO N ...... LO co LO I'-- Z N I'-- '<i LO C') 0 0 c0 N N co C') 0 .0 z I'-- 0) (D 0) ...... cO ...... c0 N <.D N l!i LO m Z 0) 0 '<i co (D (D I'-- ::> ...... N ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... C') 10 ::> ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... N ...... N <D ::> ...... ...... , ...... , ...... , I'-- C') 0 LO 0) co ...... ...... co (D co 0) LO a 0) LO LO (D ...... I'-- LO LO ~ ~ 0) N N '<t I'-- 0) LO I'-- (D 0 N C') 0> C') C') 0 0 ...... (D C') C') C') I'-- LO ..., co I'-- C') LO ...... 0) 0 N I'-- I'-- N 0 I'-- '<t ...... 0) 0> co LO LO 0) >- C') N N ...... I'-- C') C') 0) I'-- C') ...... N I'-- 10 >- N C') ...... LO ...... 0) (D. N 0 0) 0) 0) o. N. >- LO N 0 0) LO C') ...... ~ N co I'-- r-.:- N 0 ...... LO 0 0 c0 C') ~ r-: ~ 0 N cO 05 o. 0) ~ '<i I'-- 0) 0) N ...... r-. ~ 0> 0 co 0 I'-- co 05 :liE ...... N ...... ...... N ...... N ...... ...... to :liE ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 10 :liE ...... ...... ...... ...... co co 0) co 0) (D 0 0) I'-- LO LO C') C') a co ~ 0 C') LO 0 ~ (D 0) ...... N N (D a N I'-- N co (D (D N -I C') N 0) (D 0 C') co co ~ (D LO co I'-- r-. -I ~ N (D LO 0> ~ C') LO 0) LO (D 0 N 10 -I 0 LO 0) co (D co co 0 I'-- co. LO I'-- LO 0 (D I'-- C') co co I'-- IX) N (D LO 0) 0) co. N (D co 0 N N I'-- N LO N 1'--. LO <.0. co 0) ~ 0) 0> ...... C') N C') C') I'-- N N l!i N 0 .0 ~ I'-- '<i ro 0 0 ...... ~ l!i N 0 I'-- C') N c:i ~ 0 N N N co I'-- C') 0. ...... N ...... ...... N ...... N ...... N IX) 0. ...... N ...... ...... ...... N ...... N ...... N en 0. ...... ...... ...... ...... ~ ...... ~ ...... ~ co co 0 C') 0) C') LO ro N <.D N C') 0 r-. ...... ...... ~ co 0 LO ...... N 0 I'-- LO 0 LO en I'-- 0) co C') ...... 0 I'-- :I: 0 ...... 0 I'-- 0 co N I'-- 0) ...... N 0 0 N :I: C') N 0> co C') ...... 0 C') (D C') I'-- 0) ~ ...... :I: ~ 0) N I'-- 0) N ...... U N (D. 0 ....... I'-- ...... (D ~. 0) LO N. 0) ~. a U N ro (D N co LO ...... N (D. ro ...... 0 I'-- N U N C') C') (D. 0>. <.0. co a:: co 0 N ...... N c0 c0 (D 05 N ...... c0 ...... cD a:: LO N N N. N cO 0 I'-- ...... ~ l!i l!i I'-- ~ a:: co '<i ~ ro ...... ...... co ~ ...... ...... N ...... N ...... N ...... ...... <D ~ ...... ...... N ...... ...... C') ...... ...... to ~ ...... ...... ...... :liE ...... :liE ...... :liE C') ...... LO 0) 0 0) C') C') ...... N LO LO LO ...... ...... ...... 0 N 0 LO ...... ~ C') r-- ~ N co 00 N C') (D ro N LO ~ (D 0> 0) ~ C') LO 0> <.D LO 0) (D 0) N r-. C') N ...... LO C') I'-- 0 CD 0) 0"> 0 CD (D a I'-- co I'-- ~ LO co N III N co 0) C') ...... CD N (D ...... I'-- I'-- C') (D en III N co N 0> (D co ...... I'-- ~. lJ) I'-- N N en III LO 0) ...... '<to 0) 0> 0> 0 '<i 0 0 c:i N 0) 0 ~ 0) <.0 UJ (D 0> LO N LO LO (D 0) 0> (D UJ LO N C') (D (D co rl C') I'-- (D UJ co 0 0> LO 0) u.. ...... ...... C') N ...... r-. u.. ...... ...... ...... ...... N rl ...... '<t u.. ...... ...... ...... 0 ...... 0 LO 0 I'-- ro ...... 0) ...... C') 0 N r-. 0 0) ro N (D N 0 LO ~ ~ ...... 0 ...... N LO co I'-- I'-- LO ro (D C') N co ~ LO C') 0) 0) ~ ~ (D C') co ...... N 0) N ~ 0) ~ 0 C') LO 0 C') (D ~ 10 N LO co N 0> ~ C') Z 0 N co ...... ...... C') N 0) I'-- 0) N C') ...... 10. Z 0) 0 co C') N C') 0) ...... 0 0) N (D 0 r-. Z LO N 0 LO (D 0> (D. ~ LO 0 '<i l!i N ~ 0 ~ r-.:- I'-- '<i co 10 ~ co ~ (D I'-- ...... l!i (D r-.:- 0) N (D '<i N m ~ 0> 0 (D 0> (D 0 (D , ...... ...... ...... ...... N ...... N , ...... ...... ...... N ...... ...... M , ...... ...... ...... ...... 0 C') (D co 0) LO I'-- (D (D I'-- (D 0 (D en 0) 0 C') C') ~ N ~ N ...... 0 0 N co co ~ 0) I'-- I'- (D LO I'-- 0> 0) (D (D 0> LO I'-- N LO LO (D 0 LO a ~ C') (D C') ~ C') LO 0 ~ ...... LO N 0) N N C') (D ~ 0> I'-- (D U ...... co ro 0> (D. co I'- ro I'- N C'). 0 C') ~ U N N 0> ~ ...... 0 0 CD 0 I'- N C') ...... N. U C') N I'-- I'-- ro 0 co UJ N 0> 0) l!i ...... ~ l!i ~ '<i (D ...... 0) LO ...... UJ I'- 0 ~ ~. 0 LO I'-- LO ~ ({) C') I'- l!i ...... UJ N 0 I'-- C') 0> r-. N C ...... N ...... ...... C ...... C') ...... N ...... ...... 10 C ...... ...... ...... N ...... ...... 0) 0 0 C') I'- I'-- (D C') CD co LO I'- 0 ...... co N 0 C') N ~ 0) N C') 0) co N C') 10 0> 0> I'- I'-- N ...... co (D C') (D ...... 0) 0) ~ ...... co 0 I'- LO 10 ~ ...... LO (D ~ ...... C') ~ (D ...... I'-- LO N LO 0) LO ~ 0 r-. co > ...... N.- o. 0) ~. C') 1'-. 0) 1'-. C') ...... 1'-. en. > 0) I'- 0) ~ (D N (D C') (D LO co 0 a > ...... ...... N I'-- ...... co. co c0 . N cO l!i m '<i r-.:- 0 ...... ...... ~ ...... ~ ...... LO ...... C') ...... ...... ...... 0 I'- C') I'- 0 I'- co I'- C') I'- 0 N (D LO LO N Z ...... ...... ...... ...... C') ...... ...... ...... ..., Z ...... ...... ...... N N ...... '<t Z ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... N ...... ...... ro ...... LO ~ LO 0 N I'-- I'- co ...... LO 0) ~ 0) LO C') co C') N I'-- N 0 co 10 co 0) ...... C') N ...... (D co N LO LO co ...... 0) ...... 0) ...... co 0) co en ~ C') I'- ro ...... 0 0> C') ...... C') N (D ro ...... 0) C') 0 (D N 0> 0> l- I'-- co N C') co. C') LO N ~ (D co co LO to I- C') (D ro co I'- ~ LO N 0 0). 0 ...... ...... a I- co 0). N C') LO I'- LO U cO 0 co co ...... ~ <.0 LO l!i LO cO N c0 cD u 0 N I'- 0 I'- I'- I'- I'-- ~ ...... 0 N c0 M u 0> ...... co 0> (D (D co 0 ...... ...... ...... N ...... ...... ...... '<t 0 ...... ...... N ...... N ...... N ...... <l) 0 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... c (/) c (/) 0 a:: 0 a:: 0 0 a OJ 0 OJ 0 ...... 00 ell I- en ell I- a 0 ...J (j) 0 ...J (j) N (/) c :> U) c :> (/) a:: x :::J a:: x :::J a:: 0 ~ u.. ~ 0 w u.. ~ 0 I- 0. Z a:: l- n: Z a:: I- (j) U c ~ in U c ~ in w :::J 0. w :::J 0. s: 0::: (f) ...J s: 0::: (f) -I s: ~ a.. a.. 0 a.. 0. 0 a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. ~ ~ a.. a.. 0 a.. a.. 0 a.. a.. a.. a.. 0. a.. 0. ~ ~ 0. a.. 0 a.. a.. 0 a.. a:: 0 () () () () (f) () () () () 0::: 0::: 0::: I- a:: () () () () () (f) () () () 0 0::: 0::: 0::: I- a:: () () () 0 () (f) () ~ ...J Z C) C) 2 2 I ro ~ ~ () () () 0 ~ ...J Z C) C) 2 2 I ro ~ >- () () () 0 ~ ...J Z C) C) 2 2 I 0. w UJ C) C) - - 2 a.. z z Z I- 0. W W C) C) - 2 a.. > z z Z I- 0. W W C) C) - - 2 2 '" o '" c o ";J ~ <!J n. o '- ro <!J >- m ", 16 1_8';13 m OJ t10 '" a. ..- (!) 0 (!) 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 ..- (!) 0 0 t- t- '<t (J) t- o '<t 0 0 '<t 0 0 0 ..- t- N 0 N C') ..- C') L!'l ..- ..- N L!'l L!'l 10 M ..- 0 0 C') 0 0 0 ..- co 0 0 t- o L!'l L!'l 0 0 t- ex:> (!) N N (!) 0 (!) 0 t- o t- o 0 (J) 0 N '<t (J) (!) C') '<t ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- C') '<t L!'l N ..- ..- N 0> ..- co 0 (!) 0 0 ..- co '<t 0 0 N 0 C') (!) 0 0 0 0 N L!'l L!'l '<t 0 0 0 (!) 0 0 ..- N '<t (J) 0> N L!'l C') ..- t- L!'l t- ..- ..- ..- ..- '<t C') t- N co ..- ..- N 0> C') (J) 0 0 0 0 0 C') ex:> 0 0 '<t 0 '<t L!'l 0 0 t- (J) 0 0 (!) (J) 0 0 0 0 L!'l 0 0 L!'l C') '<t N (!) C') ..- L!'l L!'l N 0 ..- ..- ..- ..- '<t ..- ..- t- O> ..- ..- ..- N N .... .... '<t ..- 0 '<t '<t 0 0 t- o 0 0 L!'l 0 '<t 0 0 0 (J) N 0 N '<t L!'l 0 0 0 t- N L!'l 0 0 L!'l L!'l 0> '<t C') ..- L!'l '<t t- ..- 0 ..- ..- '<t ..- (!) ..- 10 ..- ..- ..- N 0> N 0 0 co (!) 0 0 0 0 '<t 0 0 0 N '<t 0 0 N '<t 0 0 0 0 0 ..- t- t- ..- co 0 ..- C') '<t 0> C') N ..- '<t C') (!) (!) C') t- N N ..- N ..- 0 co to- ..- ..- to- o t- o co N 0 ..- '<t ..- C') 0 0 0 N C') 0 0 0 (!) 0 t- C') 0 0 0 N N N ..- 0 ..- co co '<t ..- ..- '<t 0 ..- L!'l '<t '<t N '<t N ..- N ..- N N M ..- ..- ..- to- t- '<t 0 L!'l ..- 0 0 0 L!'l ..- 0 0 0 t- C') 0 0 N 0 N L!'l 0 0 ex:> 0 '<t (J) N '<t 0 0 '<t L!'l 0 ..- '<t co (J) N L!'l (!) N (J) N C') ..- N N t- .... ..- ..- 0> (!) co 0 co (J) 0 0 N (J) N 0 0 0 C') N 0 0 C') C') N C') C') '<t 0 0 N C') '<t L!'l 0 0 L!'l 0 0 ..- '<t t- L!'l C') C') ..- ex:> (J) C') C') ..- ..- ..- (J) co ..- ..- co 0 IJl 0 IJl 2 .><: .c Q) ro u 0 .><: .><: E c .><: (J) ro ro u: Q) (L - .><: .><: x .><: 0 ro 0 - () 0 ro ro ro .><: E .c (L (L 0 >- 0 Q) 0 (L .><: ro .><: u Z;- 0 "0 .~ .c (L (L 0. (L .c ro (ij Q) (J) Z;- .c c '5 u 0 .><: 0 E Z;- u Z;- ~ (L 1/1 W 'c; 'c; U ell C C ~ (ij Z;- .><: .><: (L (L Q) (J) :::J :::J (J) 0 'c; 0 ro 0 'c; (J) 'c; ell ro >- ~ :::J :::J U .c Z;- ~ c/l :0 E E Q) c .c (L () ~ :::J C 'c; Qj E E Q) ~ :::J U :::J U (L :::J E (L 'c; c Q) :2 :0 E E :0 E (J) t E (J) IJl E - ell Q) :::J Ql > E E :::J :2 .c t ro C E E ro .c :::J E OC :0 :2 0 "0 0- 0 0 E .c 0 E .c '5 E I X u E a::: "0 0 ~ <( () () :2: 0.. ,Q> 0 0 Q) >- Q) 0 J!1 c E E () () .><: 0 ,Q> .... 0 0 0.. ,S1 ill ro 2 E () 0 ell E ~ Q) ~ ro Q) Q) Q) 2 () I <( () I (J) (J) () ro :Q 0:: UJ 'm Q) 0 Q) ro IJl IJl IJl ro ro ro u n Q) Q) >- CO 0 () .c ~ 0- Q) Q) Q) (L ell U; U; Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) :::J .c U u <:::: (L W ell E Q) () .(3 u .><: 0. 0. C) C) C) C) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) cJl 0- X Q) 0 0 CO ro a::: IJl ro ~ IJl '" E ell ell ro ro ro ro ro IJl <( UJ 0::: (J) (J) ID :.c IJl "0 CU ...J ell ell 0 0 ell ell (L C C ro u.. .c u IJl Z Z 0 c c C c () () .><: .><: .><: .><: .><: I (L (L (L (L (L .r: 0 c Q) '(ij Qj ell 0 IJl Q) Q) "0 Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 0 0 0 0 U Q) ell ro t ill >- (ij .><: 5- 0, U; U; Q) "0 :!2 :!2 :!2 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: ,S1 "0 Q) "0 Q) U ~ ~ E E E E E X ro u n OJ c 0 ~ 0 ell () () () () () Q) Q) c .... 0 >. ell ell ell 0 0 0 :::J :::J E E E E E cJl ell :::J OJ ell 0 () () () W W W u.. C) C) C) C) C) C) :2: z z z z z U5 0 (L (J) (J) i= > > :> I- ~ '" .... c OJ a: ~ 'iJ ro u.. '" .... '" o ro c o 'P ~ OJ 0.. o .... '" OJ >- m N Q) 0.0 '" Q.. ; , t j ..~~ , ~ ..A 16 , 't~" B ~ 3 \ () L ~ '" .., c Q) ex:: >- ,-t= ~ 0 ~ C") 0 1O ~ (j) 0 (j) 0 C") 1O 0 0 ~ (j) ~ '<t ... 1O N 0 ... <0 <0 (j) ... C") '<t N 0 0 <0 ~ (j) ~ (j) ~ ... <0 C") '<t (j) .... co ... N .... (j) (j) <0 '<t 1O ... (j) C") ~ ... '<t <0 ... C") ... '<t 1O .... .... .... ... ... (j) '<t >- ... <0 0 .,... >- u. 0 0 CD l[) 0 r--- r--- 0 0 0 .,... '<t 0 0 0 .,... r--- 0 0 C0 0 CD 0 0 C0 0 0 Q) CD 0 .... .,... CD C0 l[) l[) N .,... .,... .,... '<t Q) <0 a. .,... III ell U) (j) 0 >- u. 0 0 N C0 0 .,... N 0 0 0 0 r--- 0 0 0 C0 C0 N N r--- CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <0 Cl N N .,... '<t C0 .,... .,... 0) ::l .... ~ a> 0 >- u. .,... 0 0 co 0 l[) N Q) 0 0 0 0 '<t 0 0 N r--- 0 '<t 0 N 0 0 0 co 0 co 0 0 r--- C0 ~ >. C0 N N l[) .,... l[) .,... C0 C0 C") "5 C") ..... a> 0 >- U. '<t 0 N co 0 C0 N '<t 0 0 0 0 l[) 0 0 C0 co r--- co N 0 Q) 0 '<t .,... 0 r--- 0 0 l[) CD '<t ell 0 0 CD 0 0 0 N C0 l[) .,... '<t .,... l[) '<t N .,... CD '<t co c '<t ::l ..... a> 0 >- u. CD 0 r--- N 0 l[) CD co 0 .,... 0 '<t Q) 0 0 l[) CD co N .,... Q) 0 CD '<t 0 l[) co 0 0 Q) co 0) >.0 0 N 0 0 0 .,... C0 r--- C0 '<t C0 C0 CD .,... .,... .,... N C0 0 co 0) ., .,... .,... ~ ~ a> 0 >- U. N 0 N r--- 0 N 0 co 0 '<t 0 r--- r--- 0 0 L[) C0 0 '<t 0 C0 0 '<t N C0 co N 0 N 0 .,... <0 a. 0 0 L[) 0 0 r--- C0 N 0 .,... CD '<t '<t .,... .,... C0 CD .,... C0 N co co N N .,... .,... .,... ... ~ ... a> 0 >- u. .,... 0 '<t 0 0 Q) ~ co 0 '<t 0 L[) CD 0 0 '<t L[) 0 .,... 0 L[) 0 CD I"-- 0 N Q) 0 0 Q) 0 '<t ... 0 0 N 0 0 N C0 C0 L[) .,... '<t CD .,... .,... C0 L[) .,... C0 N C0 0 '<t ., N .,... N N N ~ ... a> 0 >- u. CD 0 N l[) 0 l[) 0 0 0 0 0 Q) '<t 0 0 C0 r--- 0 CD .,... 0 0 '<t '<t N L[) co 0 0 L[) C0 co .c 0 0 C0 0 0 .,... '<t N co CD .,... r--- .,... 0 .,... .,... N '<t .,... .,... '<t N ell .,... .,... N .,... 0 u. ... a> 0 >- u. r--- 0 N L[) 0 co co L[) 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 N Q) 0 0 0 0 0 0 '<t N CD '<t .,... .,... 0 L[) <0 C 0 0 N 0 0 (<) .,... CD L[) '<t CD '<t .,... CD .,... .,... .,... N 0 1O ., .,... .,... <0 ..... a> 0 >- u. Q) 0 0 CD 0 CD L[) 0 0 0 0 L[) 0 0 0 N N 0 co C0 0 0 0 '<t C0 N co 0 .,... r--- l[) co <.J 0 0 N 0 0 .,... .,... CD l[) .,... CD C0 .,... r--- .,... N .,... co 0 0) ell .,... 1O 0 Q) 0 >- u. co 0 '<t l[) 0 CD Q) N 0 0 0 r--- N 0 0 L[) CD C0 co N C0 0 0 N 0 .,... N .,... .,... co .,... ... > 0 0 N 0 0 0 C0 CD co .,... I"-- .,... '<t co N C0 C0 N 0 co <0 0 .,... .,... co Z 00 0 >- u. Q) 0 L[) C0 0 l[) N 0 0 0 0 C0 .,... 0 0 l[) .,... 0 .,... N 0 0 0 co 0 Q) C0 0 0 Q) L[) '<t .... 0 0 '<t 0 0 0 C0 co CD .,... I"-- L[) '<t co '<t .,... '<t .,... 0 C0 C") <.J .,... N 0) 0 00 0 >- 0 u. .... II) -I 0 (j) Qi <( (j) C .Y. ... 0 .Y. .Y. Z -<= 0 .Y. ro Q) Q) ro .Y. -to .Y. ro 0 0 ro - E () a.. 0 ro ro .Y. w (j) -<= a.. 0 0 '" x a.. -to ro a::: a.. 0 u:: a.. Q) a.. 0 .~ -<= 1:;- ~ -<= a.. X- 0 <'>- B '" a.. ~ E (j) .~ 06 'c 0 0 1:;- ~ 2:'.Y. a.. 0 c ~ ro .Y. E (j) ~ c (j) 0 0 ro 0 c '" ~ :>. ~ c ::l (j) ,~ ::l ::l C -<= a.. c -<= 0 C ::l C ro .~ iii ;! W "0 ::l E Q) co E E ~ ::l 0 ::l 0 a.. () ::l 0 E a.. C ... 2:' ~ :Q E =0 E E "0 E (j) E (j) E = -<= OJ C ::l c: 0 E ::l "0 0 -<= t '" 0 E E - -<= ::l E Q) '" "0 2 E :Q 0' 0 0 E E -<= :J E :r: x :>.(j) ro 0 E a::: <( .Y. 0 ~ -<= e- o 0 ~ c E C -<= "0 0 0 2 <( 0 () 0 ,Ql 0 ,Ql 0 a. 0 0 ~ Qi = 2 Q '" E u.. 0 ro ~ E 0 <( () ~ '" E () w OJ 0 ~ OJ .Y. (j) (j) OJ OJ 2 Q) 0 :r: 0 :r: (j) (j) :e a.. 0 B W CJl ro 0 0 C E ro ro a.. ro iii co co OJ ~ :>. ~ W OJ 5: a.. Q) Q) Q) '" U; U; OJ OJ OJ Q) Q) ::l -<= 0 0 a a.. w '" OJ () '0 .!:::l OJ ro a.. (j) (j) .Y. <'>- <'>-c.9 c.9 c.9 c.9 ~ Q) OJ ~ OJ (j) 0' X Q) 0 0::: (j) II) ro (j) OJ '" '" (j) ~ ro '" :.0 (j) ::l W (j) '" ro ro ro <( w 0::: (j) U) ro - 'E '" <( '0 5: ..c ro U C1l '" 0 '" '" C1l OJ a.. c c --l (j) --l C C C C 0 .Y. .Y. .Y. .Y. .Y. 0 C .~ Qi '" u.. lD c Q) E a.. (j) ~ z z OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 () :r: a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. -<= C1l - OJ ~ c 0 .Y. ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0 OJ ,~ C1l "0 "0 :>. .s W 0 .Q ~ "> '" E a. CJl U; U; "0 "0 !2 !2 ..... ~ E E E E E x ro 0 ..c CJl OJ c OJ OJ '" :>. x 0 :>. C1l '" C1l 0 0 0 0 ::l ::l E E E E E '" () () () () () (j) Q) C1l ::l CJl C1l W c 0 w ro > '" C1l C1l .!!! () () w w w c.9 c.9 c.9 c.9 c.9 c.9 2 z z z z z U5 0 a.. (j) U) i= > > :> I- u.. <( <( ro ro () () u '" u.. 13 '" a '" c o '.,:J ~ Q) a. o ~ '" Q) >- "" .... OJ 1lO co 0.. ~ co ..... e OJ c.: ~ 'u co u.. ~, 1&1181] co o >- IL CMN~m~N~N~m~~VON~Mo~mN~~ONmOCON !;M~MNmm~VO~M~~~mM N~V~ ~ mmm MMMN~~ ~ co M N ~ N NNm ~....~ aN-r- Q) (/) co o >- IL ClO :I < 00 o >- IL ~~~roo~N~omovoooorovroO~OONN~ ~ N~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ m~~ v O..ONN'" ~ ~ ~ m ~ v N ",,,,mo~~aooa,,,oom~om,,,~ v N N ~ ~vo M ~~~O~~ON~O~~N~O~OOOOo~oo~oo~mo 3 ~ ~~ ~ N ~ '" ~",N , M co o >- IL ~~aN~g~~~~N~N~O~~ooN~o",~~~"'~~~ :I ~ ~ , co o >- IL ~N~o~ill~~~m~~~~~~oooo~o~~~o~~~~ :E ~ ~ co o >- IL ~~~~~vro~rov~omroo~Nooo~~~O~O~N~~ ~ ~~~Nm~ v ~ ~ ~ V N ~~N c:::( '" "" "" ~ co .... o >- IL ~~NV~VVCX)V~~~~~ co r-c.o",,,,,CON..q- C') == ~ ~ co o >- IL .c~oVcx)N~~m~~o~v Q) ~N~~~O ~ ~ IL ~ ~ co o ~ co ..... co o co e o +:; ~ OJ C- O ~vooo ~ ~~~omoNV~~ L{)T"""-.q ('t') ~~M .... ON~OOCX)VNOcx)OO~O~ V ~ N ~ ~~co ~ ~ m o~roo~CX)ooo~~vo~o~mom ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ vv~ ~ ~ co .... co OJ >- m ~oo~~~~~~g"'" , co o >- IL ~"'NNN~~~~N~mL{)~O~COooO~C')OO~ON~~~ c ~ ~ to- o >- IL >vov~mm~o~v~~vO~vOOONOvO~OO~cx)N o """"L{) N N '" N L{)L{)N Z M to- o >- IL o o .r:: U (/) .><:: E .C" <l> ~w Gi o<S .r:: > J!1 i3~~:g ~lD*~ lDU).r::~ -0 ~ B !>> a. co 0 ..E ..c en ~ E 0 .><:: C1l O..!l! g (; lD 00 U) .::Jt. ~ tfi .... C1l e ro a. ._ a. >- LL .~ :2 oes 3 ::I .~ E E ro E E ::I o <3 ~ o U) 2 Ol Ol C1l ~ Ci c.9 ...J C1l e OlZOl o,(j)32 C1l C1l 0 wwc.9 ..... 0 OvvO~NNOONN~O~ N N "" "" o ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ V M Gi c'><:: Ol ro oa. ~.~ e e ::I ::I E E E E o 0 00 Ol Ol 10 co c.9c.9 e e Ol Ol U U 00 c.9c.9 -cx-c ro Ol ro a. Cia. ~Z'~.~ a. .~ 0 3 -oL-ErnE E 15 E ~oa.O <(0(/)0 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol J!1 J!1 ~ (ij~~C1l -6ooI E E E )( E E E ~ t)('l')OC')c.ol'-~~<<; o to- o >- 00 IL o U) ..J ~ Z W ~ ~ :::::i U 4( IL C W ~ co W W IL o o (ij n I ~ >-(J) 0;: Qj (ij 2 E uUBQ)~ OlgCia.w a::(/)(J)Qj..!l! a. a. a..r:: 0 a:: a:: a:: ~ Ol oooroVl zzzU50 u ~~ ::I .r:: CT )( <w a. a. a:: a:: 00 zz .><:: ro a. .~ e ::I E E E o J!1 Ow ~ E Ol lD (ij Ol e a. (ij .l:1 (ij -6 a;.gE a. (/) E .><:: ro .><:: a. ro a. .r:: "5 o (J) .><:: .><:: ro roa. a. >- Ul E'~ :B e ::I C .r:: ::I E CIl ~ E E a:: ~ ~ <3 ~ o U) 'u U) U <IS ~ ~ u. Qj iU' :B Q).S 0 > > I- co e .Q m Ol a:: :n ffi "(ij Ci> ut::u mOle ::I .2' C1l (/)1-> COOCloocom ~ ~ ~ >- ~ en o >- IL O..OONN ~ aO Q) (/) en o >- IL 010 ::l < en o >- IL ~OO~OONN :; ~ , en o >- IL ONOOO~ ~ Q)OO~OOO~ e ..... ::l , en o >- IL ~00~000~ <IS ..... :E en o >- IL ~OONOOC"l~ a. ..... < en o >- IL ~OONOO....~ <IS ..... == en o >- IL .cOONOOO~ Q) ~ IL en o >- IL coo~oooo <IS , en o >- IL UOOT"""OOT"""0 Q) C 00 o >- IL >OOroOON~ o Z co o >- IL ...OO~OON~ u o 00 o >- m IL o (/'J ..J ~ Z W ~ ~ :::::i U 4( LL C W U) 4( CO . w W LL .><:: ro a. e:- C1l c.r:: Ol U ... E ~ ...., Ol lD .3wo e 5 .EOl o (ij Co > m <<co Gi > ~ Ol Ol U) .r:: U) U C1l ro a..r:: E 0 ..!l! g 00 .><:: .><:: ro ro a. a. ~ ~ .0 .!!! E > C1l >-)( C1l C1l lDO rl OJ b..) eu 0- ~~,. 813 .. ~ 1 } 1 ' x Vl X on c .;:; I- o Cl. ~ et: :::> <l: \ ! ',\) 6 1 '. I!. " . I Cl M I' ..... I' M I' ..... It) <0 0 ... ... I'-- OJ -- ("') I'-- LO en Cl ~ 0:) I' It) 0 M I' I' <:t I' l- N ("') 0 CD ("') OJ CD ... It) ~ >- ..... I' It) en <0 I' I' <0 >- N N ... CD ("') I'-- ("') 0 >- ..... M 0:) -- N <0 CO en 0 0 0 ...... >- >- I >- u.. u.. u.. c.... 0 LO LO Ol CD Ol CD <:t 0 OJ N CD -- ... -- 0 N Cll LO ... Ol CD CD <:t -- ... N -- LO LO (;) en -- N <0 - -- M - 0. 0. 0:) Cll Cll (;) en en >- lL. ClN 0 0 ("') CD 0 I'-- N 0 OJ CD ... LO N 0 N -- 0:) ~ -- I'-- LO ("') 0 0:) -- N ("') -- -- Ol ... M <t ("') <:t Cl -- -- <:t OJ 0:) ~ ~ 0 <t <t >- u. :; ... I'-- I'-- ("') Ol Ol I'-- 0 <0 <.D ... I'-- 0 0 I'-- ... N (;) -- CD LO 0 ("') LO <.D (;) -- LO ... -- N -- CD M -, -- -- ("') 0:) .?:- -- -- <:t .?:- 0:) ~ ~ 0 -, -, >- lL. Cll <.D I'-- I'-- OJ I'-- LO LO <.D ..... OJ ... Ol ("') OJ ("') -- 0 <0 <.D ("') ... -- -- CD Ol OJ -- en c OJ <.D -- I'-- I'-- ("') I' N ("') ... -- ... 0 0 I' -- ("') N Ol ("') <.D ("') OJ 0:) ~ -- -- -- ... 0 Cll -- -- N ("') 0:) Cll -- Ol N It) -, ..... C C ..... 0:) ~ ~ 0 -, -, . ?:- ><.D ("') CD <.D LO Ol Ol -- It) LO <.D Q) <.D Q) <.D LO 0 <0 I'-- -- -- ("') CD OJ ("') 0 0 en <II __ Q) ... N I'-- Q) CD N N ("') ("') -- N I'-- N <:t OJ N N N CD I'-- OJ I' :2: -- ..... ("') ("') N > N <:t > ... -- 0:) 0:) ..... <II <II (;) :2: :2: >- lL. ... N LO OJ Ol ("') OJ 0 ... en LO 0 OJ -- Q) <.D <.D ("') 0:) <.D 0 LO N ... 0 ... <.D -- 0:) 0. N ("') <.D -- I'-- I'-- I'-- <0 ... N LO ("') LO Q) 0 ..... -- OJ N ("') N I'-- LO N N <t N -- ("') en ... N -- ("') en ... N N I' 0:) 0. 0. 0 <t <t >- lL. ... ("') Ol ... CO 0 -- 0 N I' ... 0 OJ N LO I'-- <.D ("') It) ... ("') N OJ Q) -- OJ <.D N M <II -- Q) LO Q) LO ("') Ol M N ("') <.D ... LO ("') I'-- -- <:t N ... ("') -- ... I'-- Ol Q) M :2: -- N I' ... N -- ("') en ... -- -- N CO CO l"il <II 0 :2: :2: >- lL. ..c ... 0 ("') ("') LO LO Q) ("') N <.D <.D LO N Q) 0 ... Q) ..... ... Q) <.D <.D LO LO LO LO 0 It) Cll N CO <.D -- -- -- LO I' N 0 ("') I'-- ... -- OJ en -- <.D ("') -- -- I'-- I'-- 0 lL. -- M ..c N N <0 ..c -- <:t CO Cll Cll 0 lL. lL. >- lL. C OJ <.D OJ Q) I'-- LO I'-- -- ..... N 0 LO ("') OJ CO I'-- M 0 -- ... 0 OJ ("') N -- -- (;) <II -- I'-- I'-- I'-- <.D Ol -- M ("') OJ LO <.D ... -- -- ..... ("') -- LO 0 ... I'-- LO -- CO -, N ("') en c N -- ... (;) C N -- ("') CO CO <II ..... <II 0 -, -, >- lL. u -- CO N 0 -- Q) ... -- <:t <.D LO LO 0 CO <.D ("') -- N I'-- I'-- <.D <.D ... -- ("') I'-- 0 ..... Cll N <.D I'-- -- N ... ... N Q) LO ... N -- 0 <0 -- LO N -- N I'-- ... <0 CI -- M U N <:t u -- M I' Cll Cll 0 CI CI >- lL. > N ... -- ("') -- 0 LO Q) It) Q) N LO OJ ... 0 ... ... <0 ... I'-- OJ ("') ("') OJ LO 0 0 CO 0 N LO Ol LO 0 M -- LO ("') CD ("') ("') <:t I'-- OJ I'-- N N <.D ("') CO Z -- ("') <0 > -- N It) > N It) I' 0 0 0 Z Z >- lL. - -- 0 0 0 0 0 Q) 0 N 0 -- ("') OJ LO 0 0 LO N Q) LO <.D ("') N ... ... I'-- 0 0 U -- <.D LO CD CD N N ... ("') ("') N ... ("') ... -- <.D N <:t 0 C') <:t - -- N It) - -- M I' U U 0 0 0 >- lL. If) If) 0 If) If) If) ..... If) IX) OJ en OJ 0 OJ 0 ..e -.:: 0 .s .0.:: N .-E .0.:: >- u.. X C >- u: X Co C >- u.. X Co c ~ OJ -.:: OJ .0.:: OJ .0.:: lL. -0 0... :J "C lL. -0 n. 0... :J Co "C lL. -0 n. 0... :J Co :s! Cl. u.. OJ '0 u.. '0 u.. CI c E C ~ 0... CI c E >- :Z 0... CI c E .~ ~ 0... 0 ...J OJ en ...J OJ - en ...J OJ en 0 .c 0 .c 0 0 0 () .~ rJ) 0 0 () , ~ rJ) 0 0 () C g rJ) .~ :J C ~ :J C .~ :J C fJ) If) E :J C 0. en rJ) E :J C 0. fJ) If) E :J C a. :J ~ t ~ :J :c fJ) :J t ~ :J ..c fJ) :J~ t (f) :J ..c fJ) E E ~ ~ E E E D.. ;;; 0' If) 0 X II! D.. 0' 0 X E II! D.. ~ 0' rJ) 0 X II! - <( (jj a. 0 0 OJ E <( 0. 0 0 OJ E <( (jj Cl. 0 0 OJ E i: u (f) () ~ 0:: Cll i: u OJ (f) 0 :; 0:: Cll i: 0 0 .~ 0:: Cll 0 OJ OJ 0 ..c 0 OJ OJ 0 ..c 0 OJ OJ (f) 0 ..c fJ) ro .c fJ) ro .c fJ) ro .c >- (jj OJ Q) :J 0 () E (jj OJ Q) :J 0 () E (jj OJ OJ OJ :J 0 () E n:: C) ~ OJ If) 0' OJ n:: C) 5: Q) If) 0' OJ n:: C) ~ OJ If) a:l 0' OJ W e- m If) <( ~ If) Cll w e- m rJ) <( ~ If) Cll w e- m If) <( ~ If) Cll OJ c :2: c :2: c :2: m c () .0.:: m c .0.:: OJ m c .0.:: OJ c 0... OJ :r: 0... 0... OJ 0... OJ () :r: 0... 0... OJ 0... OJ () :r: OJ 0... 0... OJ :E 0 Qj iii :E 0 2 :E 0 Qj s 0 -0 0 E X ~ ~ 0 -0 () E X ~ ~ .s () -0 0 E x .~ ~ ~ w z 0 C) Cll () () Q; - w z 0 C) OJ 0 () w z 0 C) OJ (jj 0 0 Q; E 0 E OJ 0 E 0 :E w C) C) :;:: z z > I- :E w C) C) :;:: z z > ~ :E w C) C) :;:: 0... Z Z > I- I- .E 2 ro -0 eu c o ';:; ~ OJ Cl. o I- eu OJ >- (l1 16 t.~t B 13 M OJ bD '" a.. C 10 M ..... 0) M (0 0 I"- 10 10 '<t C ~ 0) '<t 0 '<t ..... 10 co co M 10 ..... ~ cq. ~ co 0 ..... ..... ..... co ~ ~ ..... 10 co M ....: V'l 00 V'l 0 ..... ..... N 0) 0 0 ..... ..... V'l N <fl ..... ..... <fl 0) ..... >- V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l >- LL LL m N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M ..... C') 00 ..... ffl lfl ffl ..... lfl ffl Il) a. C') ..... ffl 00 N '<t N N a. Ql V'l ffl ffl ffl ffl ffl N Ql CI) V'l CI) '<t 0 0 <0 0 N 0 N ..... 0 10 00 N ffl 00 ffl ..... (fl C") lfl (fl co Cl 00. ..... N. lfl ...... I"- (0 Cl :J N c0 lfl ..... ..... ffl .,f :J <( (fl ffl (fl (fl (fl ..... <( V'l 0 0 m C") 0 <0 0 I'- 00 lfl co C") lfl <0 <0 (fl <0 (fl ..... 00 lfl M '<t. (fl <0 <0 '<t <0 ..... N M :i c0 (fl ffl . (fl (fl 00 :i ..... ..... .., (fl ffl ffl <fl .., m C") 0 ..... 0 0 0 lfl 0 0 co m '<t 0 0 lfl 0 lfl 00 <0 lfl C") C') lfl 0 N I'- I'- (fl '<t (fl <0 00 I'- C") ffl M ..... 0 lfl (fl '<t I'- N 00 N I'- N N ..... 0 (0 e I'- N 0 <0 ..... ..... '<t 10 e (fl C") I'- (fl ffl (fl (fl m lfl '<t. '<t. I'- 00 ..... N V'l (fl '<i cD ffl (fl . (fl r--: cD :J m 00 ~ :J ..... ..... ..... ..... .., (fl (fl (fl (fl N .., (fl ffl (fl N (fl M V'l (fl ~ I'- m 0 I'- 0 lfl 0 I'- <0 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <0 m 00 0 M 0 m lfl 00 V'l ..... (fl m ..... 0 I"- ffl (fl (fl (fl ffl (fl (fl (fl lfl C") C') lfl co >- lfl. <0. ffl <0. (fl ..... m lfl. ~ >- <0 ..... N '<t '<t lIS C") ..... ~ N N ~ M lIS ..... (fl ci ffl N :E ffl (fl (fl (fl ..... :E (fl ..... ..... <h ffl <h 00 lfl 0 N 0 '<t 0 '<t 00 0 0 ..... C') 0 '<t N 0 0 0 0 N m V'l 0 ffl ..... ffl 0 I'- ffl N '<t 00 ffl m lfl lfl ffl (fl N ... I'- "! lfl N ..... 0 ~ ... V'l N ~ (fl ffl (0 a. ffl ~ ffl '<i N c0 ..... a. ffl <h <( ffl ffl (fl ..... <( <h ..... N 0 lfl 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 0) <0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 I'- I'- ffl lfl ffl 00 ffl N ffl (fl 0) '<t m ffl '<t ffl 0 ffl ffl ffl co ... <0 lfl C") ~ lfl N ... m '<t <0 ~ ..... lIS ffl ffl ffl ffl N lIS (fl ffl ffl N :E <h ~ <h lfl <0 0 C") lfl 0 0 lfl 0 0 '<t ..... lfl 0 00 0 <0 0 0 0 0 N lfl (fl '<t '<t ffl (fl <0 (fl ffl M lfl I'- ffl I'- (fl N (fl ffl ffl M .a C") N ..... ffl ffl co .a N N 00 ffl ~ Ql ffl ffl (fl <h Ql (fl ffl ffl ..... LL LL <h N <0 0 N 00 m 0 <0 C") 0 I"- '<t ..... 0 00 0 0 lfl 0 lfl M lfl '<t ffl <0 <0 lfl ffl <0 N ffl I"- C") ..... (fl m (fl '<t ..... ffl I'- l"- e N N lfl ffl 00 <0. ffl ~ e 00 lfl 00 <0 N C") '<t c0 N c0 ffl . ffl cO (fl ffl (fl N lIS ~ ..... lIS ..... .., ffl ffl ffl ..... .., (fl ffl ..... <h <h <0 '<t 0 m 0 0 0 0 m 0 co I'- 0 0 0 lfl lfl 00 0 lfl 0 I'- m (fl N (fl ffl (fl 0 C") ffl M lfl (fl ffl m <0 I'- C") (fl ..... '<t (,) ..... C') o. C') ~ 0 (,) 00 lfl. ~ ffl (fl ~ co Ql ffl ffl N ffl M Ql c0 ..... .0 c ~ ..... C ffl (fl <h <h 00 lfl 0 ..... 0 C') 0 00 <0 0 0 N 0 0 lfl 0 00 lfl 0 0 0 <0 C") (fl 0 (fl LO (fl ..... C') ffl ..... N ..... <h I'- (fl C") ..... ffl (fl (0 > N ~ '<t ffl N ffl '"": > N ffl C") (fl ..... I"- 0 ffl ffl ffl ..... 0 ffl ffl ffl <h Z <h Z C") <0 ..... ..... 0 0 0 LO 0 0 (0 '<t 0 lfl N 0 lfl 00 0 C") I"- ..... ..... C') 0 (fl (fl ffl N ffl ffl co '<t 00 '<t ffl C') C") ffl lfl 0) - <0 C') ffl <0 N I"- - ...... C") lfl (fl ffl N M (,) ffl ffl l!"i ffl cD (,) ~ (fl ffl (fl N 0 ffl <h 0 <h 0 C ..... 0 0) Ul 0 Q) .... 0- ~ Ul 0 N - .9- U c E E ~ a. CI) ro en ro :E Q. ..c: Q. u <9 ro Q) (,) :c Ul ~ (,) w Q) i!! i: .... ... i: Q) 0:: :e lIS L. "E ~ lIS CI) "0 CI) ~ ro <l::: (,) "0 IX .<:: IX <( 5 :5 x ..c: :5 0 0 0 ..c: w (,) 0 co c6 0 Q) (,) CI) c 0 0- CI) 0 11. 0 11. 11. 0 11. 11. 11. 11. 0 11. 0 11. 11. 11. 11. 11. Q) 0- r. ~ 0- ro J: 0 0 0 0 0:: 0 0 Cii J: 0 0 0 0 0 0 u E 0 :J 0 E Q) Cii (') (') 0 en :c 0 - (') (') 0 :c OJ r. Qj - 0 z :2 :2 5; ~ 0:: 0 0 z :2: 5; >- :::J ro (,) 0 ro ..c: 0 CI) w (') (') :2: z f- f- CI) W (') (') :2: > (/) 0 (/) >- co 0 f- f- '" 0- r. '" L. ~ o ..c: u Ul '" ..... '" o '" c o :;:; '" Qj c- O L. '" OJ >- (Y) N <lJ tlO ro Q.. . ~ . -' , , '-;' " ',1 _. .,'1 \ ,.-~ ~ .' Vl E ro M e Q.. "0 <lJ Vl ro co Q) <lJ u.. 0 I- >- 0 ..... >- u. Co CI) rJ) Cl :l <t - :l -, 0 0 '<t N '<t '<t 0 r-- 0 0 0 ..... N (() 0 CO CO N r-- '<t (") (") CO ..... ..... c: N 0 N r-- :l N N -, 0 0 CO (J) N ..... lO 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 lO N ..... ..... ..... N r-- N r-- >- N (J) <'! nl ~ ..... '<t N (J) (") lO N 0 (") ..... 0 ..... N '<t (() lO CO 10 ..... N ..... (") '<t CO ..... ..... ..... (() ..... "'" ... N 10 Co <t (J) N (") ..... ..... CO (") (") lO 0 (J) ..... (J) (J) (") '<t 0 ... ..... 0 N CO r-- lO N ..... N (") CO lO ..... ..... M nl ..... lO lO (") ~ ~ ..... CO r-- 0 '<t (") N 0 lO (J) 0 (") (J) '<t ..... lO 0 0 N N N lO CO '<t ..... ..... ..... (() ..... ..... ..... ..... .c ..... '<t en CI) u.. (") lO 0 N '<t (") 0 0 CO 0 (") (() (") r-- N (() N (() '<t (") lO '<t (") ..... N (J) 0 ..... M ..... ..... ..... lO N c: ..... nl -, ..... 0 N r-- '<t ..... 0 N ..... 0 N ..... CO lO (J) lO CO 0 (") (J) N ..... N ..... ..... (() ..... N ..... M U ..... N '<t ~ CI) C ..... lO (") (") N r-- (J) 0 '<t 0 0 (J) 0 r-- CO lO 0 N 0 (") lO (") N N ..... N (() ..... ..... > ..... N <0 ..... 0 0 Z N m Z 0 (() CO ..... CO ..... '<t 0 lO r-- 0 (") (") ..... CO '<t CO r-- ~ '<t (") lO ..... r-- (") ..... ..... (() '<t (") '<t CO - ..... N r-- ""'- u 0 ..... ?- m S w 0::: ~ <t 0::: C) 0 0::: 0 D. <Il Q) <Il Q) t:: 0 C a: CI) c 0 0 C <Il Co W 0 ro 0. Q) Q) ,~ t:: >- 0 CJ) 0 '0 > "S 0 ?- m 0 '(jj c .c 0 W 0. <t .c 0 Q) 0 CJ) 0 Q) CJ) >- 0 0 :J <Il ~ E <Il <Il ~ .c - 0. .c m ~ Q) ell <Il <Il ~ 0. <Il Q) 0 ro '0 ell OJ . OJ en E 0 0 l!! Q) E :J <Il t:: OJ .l9 w :J C :J .s '0 Q) 0 m w ;J:::: c;t:: ell ell "0 X 0 m Q) 0 0. 0. .c 0 u.. <( <( <( 0 0 w w u::: I z a: CJ) CJ) CJ) l- S I- 16 "1B13 B ro o ro c o '';:; ~ <lJ 0. o L. ro <lJ >- rr> .--i a.> QO ltl a. E ltl .... QO o .... a. -0 a.> '" ltl CO a.> a.> u... ~~~N~~R~~8~88o;~ >- ~ N. CO 0> t- '<t. 10 ..- N LO 0> N t- lJ) CO~'r'"" ~ ("') N~ o ..- N >- u.. 0C'1..-0N :gIONC'1 LO .N~"C"""" CD 0- ~ en COO>OO<DC'1N '<t N '<t C'1 ..- 0 co co 0 N CO~MIO~to~~'<tO~to~~g q ..- LO '<t '<t. en g ..- N <( "l:tNQ)..-NT""" CO,....('t)"C""""C"') LO q ..-..- C'1. :; ..- ., '<tNOO<DOC'1'<t "C"""" T""" T""" ("f) N co N ..- C'1 N ..- M CO<DC'1COOO<D<D<DOOOOt-N q '<t ..- to...-..- C'1 ~ ~ C T""" "C"""" M ::I ., ltl ..... ltl o ltl C o "';:; ltl .... a.> 0- o .... ltl a.> >- ("t') COIOO>t-C'1CO q~"-N~ >- lIS :!: NO>Ot-o:)t-COM C'1N t-t-'<tOM C'1 10 lJ) NM COCOIOt-t-O qO>LOt-~C'1 ... 0- <( <DOOOCO..-O N 10 '<t co <D co N co co <D co C'1 co '<t q<D~~~"- ... lIS :!: C'1 ..- co 0> t- '<t <D l-o NLO C'10NCO..... T""" T""" m ~ N coNC'1'<tO>C'1 C~COT""" N 1J ~ lL t-NCO<DO..-t-N ..-'<tNO>'<tNCOl-o T""" T""" T""" ..q- C't ..... coT"""C"')I'-"C""""Q O..-LO<DCO . T""" M ('t') C lIS ., T"""Ot-....-<x>LOT""" It) ..- LOCO NN..... T""" T""" "l\t r-- ..- N u ~ o 00>0>..-0 '<t OOO..-OOCOCO N N 0 10 lJ) > co 0 oZ en Z o Sou ....0 U) C; w a: ::E ~ C) o a: D.. o W U) <( ID . W W lL OCOt-O>O O>N'<t ..-ooooo'<ten ..- N 0 '<t lJ) Oo:)'<tNO CO'<t..- ..- ..-OOOC'1NNN T""" T""" a to-- CO q ..... c C/l C/l ~ Q) E E ~ E ~ ~ C/l C/l Z 0 e o EEuca..C/l a:C/ll'll~lij~uE ~Eo,Ol(jjEg~ o~ee-ro..cg :g8'a..a..~O:ga: ~a:~.2.c(jj6~ ~~l'lIQ)oEE>-Q) C/):J:J:Cro L:c ~~~~~~~cr: C/l E C/l C/l l'lI C E 0, (]) ~ o > OJ a: W 0 L.. rn 0:: .Q '0 c C Q) a.> a.> 0- Q) u)u)1- C/l C o :;:; :5 ~ ~ ]i Q) Cl U en (1) & E Q:; o ~ E 5 e ~ ~a.. e l'lI .c a. m "5 ..... .c 0 ~ I->-Z ..- > '<t en 0 oZ en Z o j:: ~ ou I- 0 en c; w a: :!: ~ C) o Q:; a. o w en <( ID iii w lL 16 Itr' B 1.3 r=(j)~~b~~~~~O$"'" >-lJ)N_N'<tl-oM..... ..... ~ T"" Lei' >- u.. ..... lJ) &n l-o ..... l-o'<t'<tCOl-o '<tN.....NO M .ocO ..... <DC'1O>O<D<DO<DOO<D..-C'1NC'1NM LO~LO r-N T""" OT"""T"""C"')~ ~ T"""I'- T"""_N ~ ..-N ..- N <D N t- <D 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..- NN~r-(",,)N T""" ("') T""" Cl N..- <D ::I c:( t-'<t0lJ) 'VT"""COT"" 10 l'- &n ..- M ::I ., O'<tC'1NNOC'1'<tOOOOOC'1'<tO&n l'- l'-'<t..- C'1..-Nl-o T""" 0 "t"""" ~ OOC'1C'1NO'<tNOOOOOOO>'<tl-o (() N{()T""" T""" Q-r-..-O ~ N ~ N ~ ., OLOOOC'1C'1IO<DOO<DOOO..-N..... ~'<t~No;t-N ..- NNC'1~ :!: ..... OLONl'-LOC'1..- -.;;;tCON..-Q)CX)T""" 0. T""" 0_ c:( LOOOO>ONO>'<tLOl-o T""" T"""N<DtD C'1 N.O N ~ 0'<tLO..-'<tC'10<D0000t-NCO<DlJ) COCO'<tLON<D LO '<to:) ..-&n to "C"""" T"""T""" <q- C't :!: ..... 0C'10LOC'100N<DONO'<t0>C'1t-'<t N'<t'<t<DOIO..- '<t<D lJ) .c..- N lJ) Cll lL '<tNN..-'<tN0C'100<D0'<t'<t0>..-N O'<t'<tO>OLO N LO <Dt-NNO N..- NC'1 M C ..... lIS ., t-Ot-'<tLO..- T"""T"""('t')COI'-T""" U ..- C'1 Cll o O<DNONO<D..-C'100N T""" ('t') N "t"""" N It) '<t ...... ..... <D0<DC'1..- t- co ..- o co..-o 00 m roT""" C'1 (J) ..- ..- o '<t l-o '<t '<tN 1O'<t 0>..- CD N ('l') T""" T""" ..- OIO<DOO>OLOON<DCO NT""" T""" c.oOT"""T"""O C'1 l-o o 0 o "en i3 0 ::J C/l .~ ~ OJ :J en ~ CY t <(<(<( o ~ ~C 1@&C/l& ro8. aQ) Q) ot>o- C U) ~'u 0 Jj '5 8. I- ~Q)~~~~ roC/l~~~ o ~ Q) ~ ::J 0 ro U t ~ Q) S ~ .....x .s 0 ro gJ 'u !!! ~ ~ ro -0 WwU::::r:za:~U)U)i=~1- C/l Q) 0. 0 E C l'lI l'lI 00 :. 1.' i 1"'" , , ,-\ I ......: ,t. 1611813 ~ rn Q) >- M v> .<.= E Q) 0- bi) C ~ rn 0- ..c u rn Q) CD 0 M ...... ...... M .... (g <D I'- ...... 0) M 0 M M .... N .... ...... .... ...... .... I'- 0 ...... 00 M I'- ...... 0 ...... I'- <D ...... 0) .... on ...... on N N N ...... 00 M 0) 00 N N ...... C'!. on M 0) w N w ...... N w >- >- >- l!) N ~ 0 0 CD ~ N N 0) .... ~ N ~ N l!) C') co 0 .... r-- I'- l- N ~ ~ on N ~ ~ I'- l- I- 0. 0. 0. W W W (J) (J) (J) ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 CD r-- I'- N N ~ 0 0 .... r-- CO 0 C') I'- N M C') ~ ~ I'- C> C> C> :J :J :J <( <( <( CO 0 ~ 0 ~ l!) ~ ~ l!) N r-- C') ~ ~ 0 .... 0 r-- 0 (J) N N ~ LO .... ~ ~ 0) >- >- >- ..J ..J ..J :) :J :J .., .., ..., CO N ~ 0 0 l!) ~ ~ r-- on C') CD N ~ 0 .... ~ C') 0 N N l!) ~ CD 0 ~ CO .... CO 0 .... C') .... l!) 0) C') N I'- l!) N ~ 0 CD (') .... ~ ~ 0) W W ...... W ~ N Z Z Z :) :J :J .., .., ..., (J) 0 .... 0 0 C') 0 CO ~ LO ~ C') .... 0 0 (') 0 l!) 0 C') 0) l!) l!) .... ~ 0 N l!) r-- 0 0 C') .... .... 0 l!) ~ ~ 0) CO C') ~ M CD N ~ ~ .... >- >- ...... >- .... <( <( <( :2: :2: :2: .... l!) .... 0 0 (J) 0 l!) C') 0 CO C') l!) 0 0 r-- .... .... ~ CO 0 CD C') CO 0 0 0 .... 0 0 CO .... CO ...... ..J ~ CD C') ~ .... ..J ~ 0 .... ~ 0 ..J (') C') l!) C') 00 ii: .... ii: ~ N ii: ~ N 0. 0. 0. <( <( <( ~ .... CO 0 ~ r-- .... l!) .... .... ~ ~ .... 0 CD ~ .... 0 CO on CO 0 N ~ .... (J) CD r-- 0 0 N (J) 00 :J: N ~ CO .... ~ 0) :J: N C') ~ .... r-- .... M :J: N l!) (') (J) ~ I!) en 0 .... 0 ~ M 0 ~ ~ .... 0:: 0:: 0:: <( <( <( :2: :2: :2: .... CO (J) 0 0 l!) C') .... .... I'- .... (J) CD 0 N r-- 0 ~ r-- (g C') N CD N N CO I!) N 0 0 0 C') M .... N ~ (J) l!) .... 00 l!) I!) .... (J) ~ 0 r-- .... I!) r-- C') I!) ~ CO N OJ N OJ ~ ~ on OJ N ~ <D W W W u. u. u. CO .... C') 0 ~ r-- ~ N N 00 0 CO CO 0 N (J) r-- CD I!) on .... r-- .... C') N r-- C') I!) 0 0 0 (J) .... CO CO .... C') N (J) CD N r-- CO .... (J) N CD 0 .... (J) l!) N ~ ~ CD N Z N <D Z N ~ I'- Z N ~ (g <( <( <( .., .., .., 0 l!) ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ .... N on CO 0 (J) 0 ~ CD .... I!) .... I'- .... .... (') 0 0 r-- N r-- 0 0 CO II) C') C') ~ CO C') N .... ~ .... ~ N .... C') 00 ~ .... ~ C') CD C') .... 0 N 0 ~ N 0 0 ~ M W W .... W CD 0 en 0 0 0 0 0 N C C C W W W :J r-- CD C') 0 0 I!) N I!) CO <D :J ~ N 0 0 0 ~ N ~ CO II) :J 0 (') N 0 0 r-- I!) CD 0 0 r-- 0 U) N N ~ CO N ~ en U) N N ~ 0 C') N .... U) ~ C') ~ ~ .... ~ .... ~ > .... ~ > ~ N ~ > ~ N 0 0 0 I- Z I- Z I- Z Z Z Z W W W 0 l- I!) CD l!) 0 0 0 C') 0 0 0 I- 0 I!) CO 0 0 C') 0 CD r-- en 0 I- CD CO l!) ~ 0 N N 0 0 0 CO N ~ U; (J) 0 ~ r-- N N (J) 0 ~ CO N ~ .... 0 .... (J) N CD W 0 .... W 0 .... W 0 .... 0:: 0:: 0:: :Z :Z :Z 0 0 0 Z Z Z U) U) U) l- I- I- :E 0:: ~ 0:: ~ >- 0:: 0::: w 0::: w 0::: 0::: w W I- W I- W <( I- 0. Z 0. Z 0. 0::: Z C) W C) >- W C) >- OJ w Z 0 Z 0:: 0 Z 0:: lll:: :::::i 0 i: l- i: <( l- i: <( 0:: W I- Z 0:: Z 0::: <( > Z 0::: U) w 0::: (J) OJ w 0::: (J) m 0. <( W <( <( :2: <( <( :::::i ..J :2: <( <( :::::i ..J :2: :2: <( <( ..J 0. m z 0. OJ Z 0. OJ 0 <( Z :J: :2: 0:: ..J :J: :2: 0 I- 0::: ..J :J: :2: 0 I- 0 0::: 0::: ..J 0 <( 0. 0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. W <( 0 <( 0. 0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 0:: w <( 0 <( 0. 0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 0:: w I- W <( <( X 0 0 0 0 0 0::: > I- <( X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0::: 0:: w > I- <( X 0 0 0 0 0 0::: 0::: W W Z > I- W <( Z C) 0 :J: I- >- 0 0 0 w <( z C) :J: I- >- 0 <( C> 0 0 w <( z C> 0 :J: I- >- 0 <( C) 0:: W 0 0 m 0 w C) :2: :2 > > z C) ?- m 0 w C> :2: :2 > > z :2 i= C> ?- m 0 w C> :2: :2 > > z :2 i= u. 0 C> I- rn +-' rn -a ro c o '<J ~ Q) a. o co ..... co -0 co C o '';:; ~ Ql 0- o V'I ... CO Ql >- m V'I .~ E ... Ql 0- M C :;;; ... CO 0- .c u CO Ql CO 16 , , ..... ..... .... CD N M .<'1 co ....~ M 0) .... 0) CD 0) M CD 10 r-- co N co iii. M 0 10 M r-- ~ CD <'I ~ CD 0) .... 10 r-- co co 0 0 0 CD 0) N .... r-- ~ ~ 0) ~~ N 10 ..... 0) M N r-- M co N. 0 C'! M W ..j ..j ..... .... r-: U; N M uS <>> w N U; ..j N 0 uS N ..... uS ..... M w >- ..... ..... N r-- >- ..... ..... N N 0) >- .... 0 0 0 '<"'" 0 '<"'" .... CD '<"'" r-- CD "<t 0) "<t 1.0 0 r- 1.0 0) 0) 0 r-- C') '<"'" C') CD 0 1.0 0) N 0 '<"'" 0) '<"'" C') 0 '<"'" C') 0) 0) 0) I- '<"'" C') "<t 0) '<"'" <0 C') 0 I- "<t 0) '<"'" 0) C') '<"'" r- '<"'" CD I- a.. M a.. M a.. w w w CIJ CIJ CIJ C') r- 0) 0 C') C') 0 C') C') '<"'" N '<"'" CD CD CD CD 0 '<"'" '<"'" r- 0) '<"'" .... <0 "<t co r- C') N '<"'" '<"'" 10 '<"'" <0 '<"'" "<t 0 "<t CD .... 1.0 1.0 0 C) '<"'" "<t <0 r- '<"'" CD N 0 C) 0) 0) '<"'" 0 N '<"'" 0) N '<"'" CD C) ;:) M ;:) '<"'" ..j ;:) e( e( e( '<"'" "<t <0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0) N r-- C') N N 0) 0) 0 N 0) 0) 0) 0) ..... C') C') C') LO 0 '<"'" C') 0) 0 0) N N r- 0 0 "<t r- N C') C') CD >- N .... 0) '<"'" 0) C') '<"'" <0 N co >- r- 0_ C') a. C') '<"'" '<"'". C') '<"'" N >- ..J M ..J '<"'" '<"'" '<"'" u; ..J ;:) :J :J -, -, ., ~ N 1.0 '<"'" r- 0 '<"'" C') 0) 0) co 0 1.0 "<t C') 0 0 0 C') 0) C') N 0) "<t 0 0) 0) '<"'" 0 '<"'" '<"'" N r- r- LO r- ..... C') '<"'" 0) 0) 1.0 LO 0 0 co C') r- 0 '<"'" "<t 1.0 1.0 0) 0 C') 0) <0 '<"'" 0 LO 0 .... '<"'" N co 0) 0) <0 10 W '<"'" C') 0) A. "<t '<"'" r- r- 10 W 0) N C') 0 N A. C') '<"'" M W '<"'" co N. C') LO. "<t N N_ C') '<"'" '<"'" "" Z '<"'" ..j Z '<"'" '<"'" '<"'" u; Z N '<"'" '<"'" '<"'" <>> ;:) :J ;:) -, -, -, C') 0 <0 0 '<"'" N C') N co N "" 0) LO <0 N C') 0 0) <0 C') "<t 0 CD <0 0) 0 r- N 0 <0 C') 0) 1.0 "<t 0) 0 0) 0) LO C') LO LO '<"'" 0) 0) 0) .... '<"'" C') C') r- 1.0 C') "<t 1.0 "<t "<t M r- r- 0 <0 0 N 0) 0) CD LO <0 r- 0) ~ N C') 0) '<"'" '<"'". "<t '<"'" CD N .... >- 0) o_ N "<t_ CD N 0) C') N 0 ~ '<"'" '<"'" N. N "<t. <0 '<"'" A. N N N 0) '<"'" <<i" e( '<"'" '<"'" uS '<"'" '<"'" '<"'" '<"'" uS :e :2: :2: 0) C') co 0 LO '<"'" 0 N 1.0 0) ..... 0 r- 0 '<"'" LO C') <0 0 C') N 1.0 N 1.0 N <0 <0 co 0 <0 "<t N '<"'" 0 '<"'" ..... ..J 0 0 "<t LO LO LO 0) C') 1.0 0) ..J N "<t C') '<"'" "<t 1.0 1.0 "<t 0) r- "<t ..... ..J r- 1.0 CD '<"'" 0 1.0 r- 0) '<"'" N 0) "<t 0) "<t "<t 0) '<"'" C') 1.0 '<"'" r- C') 0 a. N. N 1.0. CD N A. C') 10 N '<"'" N. C') '<"'" 1.0 N r- "<t C') 10 ii2 '<"'" u; ii2 '<"'" '<"'" '<"'" '<"'" uS ii2 '<"'" '<"'" N '<"'" <>> a.. a.. a.. e( e( e( .... N r- 0 co N <0 "<t 0) "<t 10 N "<t 0 0) C') '<"'" <0 1.0 N CD <0 .... 0) "<t 0) 1.0 '<"'" 0 C') 0 0) r- 0) 0 10 J: "<t 0) co 0 0 <0 <0 '<"'" '<"'" 0) J: r- r- N N '<"'" 1.0 0 "<t r- 0 0) "" J: '<"'" N LO "<t 0 C') 0) r- r- C') .... 0 0 C') LO co '<"'" "<t_ "<t '<"'" <0 C') co 0 0_ C'). N 0). CD N CD 1.0 1.0 N 0 C') '<"'" '<"'". N 0). r- C') LO. C') N ..... Ir:: '<"'" ..j Ir:: '<"'" .,...- .,...- 1.0 N Ir:: '<"'" .,...- .,...- .,...- <>> e( e( ..... e( :e :2: :2: 1.0 N 0 0 co <0 0 <0 LO co 0 C') 1.0 <0 '<"'" .... 0 '<"'" .,...- 1.0 0) .... N 0) r- 0) <0 0 0 0) <0 C') 0 C') M N r- N <0 r- "<t LO 0) 0 CD CD 0 0 1.0 0 0) N "<t co "" <0 0 0) 0 LO .,...- .,...- LO r- '<"'" LO 10 m C') "" 0) 1.0. CD .,...- 0) "<t co III CD. N .,...- 0)- LO N 0) C') 0 m '<"'" 0) 0) '<"'" <0. "<t N a. .... C') ..... W '<"'" 1.0 0 W '<"'" .,...- '<"'" r-: w N .,...- '<"'" <>> u. ..... u. U. <0 0 co 0 C') "<t r- "<t <0 N 0 N '<"'" 0) '<"'" 0) 0 0) r- "<t <0 co 0) 0) N <0 .... C') .,...- 0) "<t N LO 0 M 0 0) 1.0 r- 0) <0 '<"'" 0) 0) co 0) 0) <0 C') 0 1.0 r- 0 C') 10 r- r- "<t 0 co <0 "<t N co '<"'" N Z LO 0) .,...- CD. 1.0 N 1.0 CD ..... Z N C')_ .,...- 1.0 r- N N. r- M Z N .,...- a. '<"'" ..... LO N '<"'" C') .... e( '<"'" .,...- LO ..... e( N .,...- N .,...- ai" e( .,...- .,...- '<"'" .,...- uS -, ..... -, -, "<t .... LO N LO 0 0 "<t 0) C') 10 <0 0) "<t 0 0) 0 N 0) "<t N M '<"'" 0 1.0 N CD '<"'" C') '<"'" "<t N .,...- CD 0) C') 0 r- r- <0 0) 0 N CD '<"'" 0 N 0 0) '<"'" 0) 0) 0) ..... "<t "<t .,...- 0 0 <0 0) LO 0 r- co 0 .,...-. l--: 0) <0. 1.0 .,...- 0 1.0 co 0 N .,...-. C'). .,...- .,...- "<t N '<"'" 1.0 .... 0 0)_ '<"'". '<"'" "<t. <0 N N. "<t C') .... W '<"'" .,...- C') CD c<l r-: w .,...- '<"'" N .,...- r-: w '<"'" .,...- '<"'" '<"'" r-: a ..... a a 0 ..... CIO N .,...- 0) N 0) 0) LO r- 0 C') 10 en .,...- .,...- "<t 0 0 '<"'" .,...- LO 0) .,...- M 0 0 0) LO N 0) 0 .,...- "<t LO "<t .... M 0 "" co '<"'" 0) "<t "<t "<t .,...- 0 N 0 "<t 1.0 LO C') 0 co N 1.0 "<t co N '<t N 1.0 co 0 0 N r- <0 0) "" a > N co LO LO_ 0) N r- "<t 10. a > C'). 0) C'). .,...- 0 r- C') 0) C')_ ..... a > N_ '<"'" 0). LO N '<"'" <0 N ..... W 0 '<"'" '<"'" CD W 0 .,...- N '<"'" r:0 N .,...- ..j w 0 .,...- '<"'" .,...- .,...- r-: ;:) z ;:) z ..... ;:) z CIJ CIJ CIJ ~ ~ ~ l- I- 0 0) N '<"'" C') <0 "<t 0) .,...- 0 .... l- I- CD <0 0 0 <0 0) C') <0 C') 0) "" l- I- '<"'" r- C') "<t <0 0 <0 LO '<"'" 0) 0) 0 0 N 0 co N r- "<t <0 "<t 0 0) 0 0 co .,...- 0) 0) CD C') C') 0) ..... 0 C') 0) 0) .,...- 0 .... .,...- N LO LO M Z 0 "<t N. '<"'" 0). '<"'". N 0) N 0 Z 0 C') 0). <0 C') 0) N C') CD ~ Z 0 0) N. .,...- 0). <0 N N. C') .,...- co W '<"'" '<"'" .,...- '<"'" <>> w .,...- '<"'" N C') ..... w .,...- .,...- '<"'" uS a a ..... a iii iii l/) w w w Ir:: Ir:: Ir:: CIJ l/) CIJ l- I- l- i Ir:: i Ir:: i Ir:: >- Ir:: w ffi w Ir:: w Ir:: W l- I- W I- ~ a.. z a.. z a.. z C) w C) w >- C) w m >- 0 0 0 ll::: :J z I- Z I- Ir:: Z I- Ir:: Ir:: Si2 Si2 e( Si2 w e( z Z Ir:: Z e( ~ Ir:: ~ ~ w Ir:: CIJ w m Ir:: CIJ w a.. m :2: e( e( :2: ::::i e( e( :e :e ..J :J m z a.. m z a.. III z 0 e( J: :e Ir:: ..J J: :2: Ir:: u. 0 ..J J: :e Ir:: u. a Ir:: 0 ..J 0 ~ a.. 0 a.. a.. a.. a.. w u. e( 0 e( a.. 0 a.. a.. a.. a.. w C) 0 <l: 0 <l: a.. 0 a.. a.. a.. a.. w C) I- 0 e( a.. a.. a.. w e( 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ir:: > Cl l- e( >< 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ir:: > a Ir:: l- e( >< 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ir:: > a w z Ir:: I- W Z C) J: I- >- 0 0 "tI 0 W e( Z C) J: I- >- 0 0 ..J e( 0 w e( z C) J: I- >- 0 0 ..J Ir:: w <l: 0 m 0 w C) :E :e > > z C) in ?- m 0 w C) :e :2: > > z C) III :2: ?- m 0 w C) :E :e > > z C) III u. 0 :e I- 813 , \ .J " '. \. (;\ i . I REVIEW / OUTLOOK IMMOKALEE SPORTS COMPLEX 16 11 B 13 . JUNE 2010 We received all the quotes for the painting of the gym. We started Miracle II Camp on the last week of June with about 100 to 150 kids per day. We received and put up the new basketball goals. We also got new Socci equipment for start the sport of Socci with our youth. OUTLOOK JULY 2010 We will finish out the Miracle II Camp in the first week of July. The Gym should be paint towards the end of the month. The basketball gym floor will be getting the clear coat put on the floor. We will be receiving 4 more basketball goals. Weare also have the Edgerrin James Skill football camp on July 26. \ . , . Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Sun N Fun Lagoon June 2010 Monthly Report 16 j~ Bq3 Starting Memorial Day weekend Sun N Fun Lagoon opened seven days week. We also had several special events during the month. During the first week of June we had between three and four school groups each day coming to Sun N Fun to celebrate the end of the year. On June 5th 350 athletes competed in a Triathlon held in the Park. Pelican Marsh Elementary School rented the facility on June 9th. We had a "Schools out Bash" on June 12th. The Collier County Sheriffs Office held their Hot Summer Nights events on June 15th and 18th. On June 19th almost 500 people came to our "Dive in Movie" at the water park. Our swim lessons and water aerobic classes continue to do well. In June we brought in almost $4500 in revenues from our programs. Our total revenues for June were $248,000 compared to $236,000 in June of 2009. In July we will be starting two new sessions of swim lesson one on Saturday July 10th and the other on Monday July 12. Many of our lessons are already filled and we had added some additional classes to meet the needs of the public. On July 9th Sun in Fun Lagoon will be open from 6:00pm to 9:00pm to celebrate Freedom Friday. We will have games and prices and admission will be only $5.00 per person. J FREEDOM PARK ~. 16 , 1 B 13 lEt . \ i. _: tr1 .... ,-: t:~ ... . ,",\' " , ,. " .. . PARAB July 2010 OVERVIEW... ...Visitation was slow due to the warm weather, but the rain has been beneficial to the plant life within the park. Many flowers and trees blooming... ...The first "Summer Camp" at Freedom Park was well received by the public and the children enjoyed themselves... ...The Park Volunteers logged 54 hours this month assisting the ranger, which in turn allows him to patrol the park while the students are out of school for the summer... ...Signage has continued to grow as new plants bloom... OUTLOOK... ...Again the weather will affect the visitation during the warmest part of the day, but we have found that early morning and later in the evening we have encountered many visitors... ...New signage has informed visitation of Catch and Release fishing only in the lake and ponds... ...Many local citizens have discovered the park that had never visited before this summer and will return as the temperature drops this Fall... . -. .. . H \;~ - 'It ~'. } . . 16"1181J Monthly Report July 2010 Golden Gate Community Park . Summer has arrived and our pools are being enjoyed by 100-250+ campers each week day. . The lifeguard staff continues to do an outstanding job of ensuring the safety of patrons. . They are also teaching lots of swimming lessons Mondays through Saturdays. . Surveys are given to participants at the end of each session. They have gotten an overwhelming majority of excellent ratings from the kids. . We are fully staffed with guards that are needed for the summer. . The Avaya phone system is in use but has a bug or two. I have been working with IT to iron them out. For now, when the public calls during non- business hours, they can hear all the pertinent information about the pool hours of operations. They can also get voice mail numbers to call for specific information on the Fitness Center or the Aquatics Programs. . The new gate at the Boat ramp has been installed and looks great. New signs with the hours of access have been quoted and I am waiting on proofs to approve. The gate will block access to the ramp from 7:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. For now the gate is kept open until the signs are installed. . Eagle Soccer Club continues to rent the Soccer field Tuesday and Friday nights until the end of the month. . We have seen an increase in the rental of the soccer field from other players. . BSN sent us the new Soccer goals and they have been assembled and placed on the soccer field. . We are seeing a continued increase in rentals for lights on both the soccer and softball fields. ,. ~ t , '- 16 I d. wl13 . The annual visit from the Public Services Director went well. We walked the park and discussed ongoing issues. Overall I think she was pleased with how everything looked. . Construction is mostly complete in the Elections building. The onsite contractor says they should be done by next week. . I met with the Treasurer of GGNLL and he brought in a check to bring their account up to date. They have been trying to play their All Star games at night, but the Florida afternoon rains have not been cooperating. . All the fields are looking great thanks to those afternoon rains. . The main seal on one of the pool pumps is still not repaired. I have contacted Shamrock Plumbing multiple times and they assure me it will be done this week. Since this has taken so long to resolve, I contacted Naples Armature Works, a local pump repair business, to come and have a look at our pump room. They visited today and stated they could do the job for less money and in a shorter period of time. I will be contacting them for a quote the next time we have an issue. . Overall, the summer is progressing nicely with no problems and lots of rain and heat and humidity. , ,'.. \./ f 16 , 1 " Parks and Recreation Advisory Board July, 2010 monthly report For the most part the month of July was all about summer camp for the staff at MHCP. The staff has spent many hours doing their utmost to provide a quality and rewarding experience for our campers. Aside from the everyday programming and field trips the campers were treated to some extra special visitors this month. Fist there was Eddie Figueroa from Discovery Reptiles. They came to the park with a large selection of reptiles some common and some rare to show to the children. He also gave a very informative talk about reptiles in general and specific information on the specimens on display. The Kowiachobee Animal preserve came to the park and gave an informative talk on the many animals on display. Next we had the Amazing Mr. A, a delightfully entertaining Magician that the children enjoyed very much. We also had a very talented Juggler entertain the children. His name is Gerard Tricarico and he had the children enthralled. Last but not least Karen Kocses from the Collier County Library System has been coming to the park on Friday afternoons to help the campers with the summer reading program. The park has started some new educational summer camp programs this year. Science, reading and math camps were offered for the first time at Max Hasse Park. A Collier County School teacher came to the park to conduct classes for elementary school children. The turnout was not as good as we had hoped but a good enough first step in making this a permanent summer camp offering. The actual numbers in the summer camp are ninety six elementary and twelve middle school campers in the full nine week camp. In July we had a total of one hundred ten weekly campers, both elementary and middle school. Also there was a total of three hundred and ninety six campers taking advantage of the before and after care. The park had one special event in July. It was the Monthly Yard Sale. This month we were extremely fortunate to get a corporate entity to sponsor the event. The Supporters of Estates Shopping Center Political Committee purchased all the garage sale spaces and made them available to vendors at no charge. As a result all of the spaces were taken. The yard sales have received enthusiastic local support making this one of the most successful yard sales to date. The Fitness center completed another successful month. The gym was used one thousand four hundred and eighty eight times by two hundred thirty nine unique users. The yoga class had nineteen participants, the strength training class had twenty participants and the Zumba class garnered three hundred and seventy six participants. 16 , 1 j: Q 1 ~ Staying with the athletic side of programming the Adult tennis class hH fotl...-' participants, the junior class had seven registrants and the pee wee class had 14 enrollees. . t ! '-' . On the programming side our summer Piano class had a total of eleven spots filled out of twelve available. Our Karate class had a very respectable thirty six participants this month. The Kinderdance program had only four enrollees this month. The staff at MHCP is looking forward to the end of summer camp 2010. r t. ~ ~ 1 I . . l. . ": ..~ '. .... 16 ,I 1 B 7f3 REVIEW / OUTLOOK IMMOKALEE SPORTS COMPLEX JULY 2010 We completed a successful Miracle II program the last week of July. We received 4 new basketball goals and we had a record breaking turn out for the Edgerrin James football skills camp on July 26. OUTLOOK August 2010 The Gym floor should be clear coated, the walls painted and the bleachers installed by the end of the month. The Pop Warner Program will start using the fields for practice throughout the month. " '-. .' Sea Turtle Program June 2010 Review and Overlook 16 I." 8413 . Weekly staff meetings. . Maintained payroll. . Completed monthly reports (sea turtle, POS free programs, How Are We Doing). . Attended supervisor meeting. . Responded to 7 sea turtle standings (n=36), transported one turtle to rehab facility for treatment. . Updated monthly wildlife interaction log (includes sea turtle and rangers) . Continued daily sea turtle monitoring at all County beaches. . Conducted beach lighting compliance inspection at Vanderbilt and Barefoot Beaches. . Weekly sea turtle monitoring at Cape Romano and Kice Island complex. . Received supplies for future oil clean up response. . Transported several A TV s to fleet for service and repairs . Sent INBS reports to FWC. . Attended site visits and meetings related to Naples and Hideaway renourishments . Coordinate BP supplies with CDES . Completed evaluations Upcoming Events (July) . Sea turtle presentations at Max Hasse and Veterans Community parks . Daily sea turtle monitoring . Conduct night lighting inspections . Supervisor meeting I l , 1611B~3 ....... ...,1 Sea Turtle Program July 2010 Review and Overlook . Weekly staff meetings. . Maintained payroll. . Completed monthly repOlis (sea turtle, POS free programs, How Are We Doing). . Attended supervisor meeting. . Responded to I green sea turtle standings (n=37) . Updated monthly wildlife interaction log (includes sea turtle and rangers) . Continued daily sea tmile monitoring at all County beaches. . Conducted beach lighting compliance inspection at Vanderbilt and Barefoot Beaches. . Weekly sea turtle monitoring at Cape Romano and Kice Island complex. . Transported several A TV s to fleet for service and repairs . Sent INBS reports to FWC. . Attended site visits and meetings related to Naples and Hideaway renourishments . Sea turtle presentation at Veterans Community park . Prep of nests for July 4 beach activities and assist with beach clean up the next day . Interview and article Naples Daily News . Presentation to Hideaway Beach Taxing District . Performance appraisal meetings . Nest excavation training Upcoming Events (August) . Daily sea tmile monitoring . Conduct night lighting inspections . Supervisor meeting . Presentation to "Ocean Kids" camp at Lowdermilk Park (8/05) . ENV volleyball tournament at Vanderbilt Beach (8/14) N CRP Rec/Plex Review/Outlook July, 2010 1611 i#13 The summer teen basketball program is off and running very smoothly. Each team still has three games to play before playoffs start. Once the playoffs start even the last place team during the regular season has a chance of winning the tournament. Weare proud of our teen league which allows teens to enjoy a structured program during their summer break compared to other options that are not always in their best interest. The Rec-Plex and our programs really do make a difference. Yours in fitness, tJaulSUuyj Recreation Supervisor Collier County Parks and Recreation I "i - t .. . ", ',~ .. _ J 1611813 Fee Policy ... ," f EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 11 B 13 Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County adopt Resolution 2010-_ re-establishing the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Facilities and Outdoor Areas License and Fee Policy superseding Resolution 2010-25. OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board approval for revision and re-establishing of the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Facilities and Outdoor Areas License and Fee Policy in order to increase Boat Launch Facilities Fees from $5 to $8 at all Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Boat Launch and Marinas. CONSIDERATION: During the June 29, 2009 budget discussions, the Board of County Commissioners requested that Parks and Recreation staff bring back additional information at a later date regarding a request for a fee increase for Boat Launch Facilities (see attached minutes from meeting). Considerable expenses have been committed to developing public water access in Collier County. During recent years the following projects have been constructed or are close to completion: Collier Blvd Boat Ramp Bayview Boat Park Goodland Boat Park Port of the Islands Marina Total $1,621,631 $1,200,000 $1,791,780 $5,488,000 $10,101,411 Table 1 Date Completed/Anticipated CompletionIPurchased May 2010 Spring 2011 June 2010 January 2009 Facility Estimated Costs Furthermore, analysis of FY 09 operating costs to FY 11 revenues associated with the boat ramp operations revealed the following: iQ;S5 'a;S8 (Q)S9 ~SIO a;Sll a;S12 FY 11 budgeted $145,750 $145,750 $145,750 $145,750 $145,750 $145,750 residential and commercial permits, parking fines, and boat slip rentals FY II budgeted $230,000 $368,000 $414,000 $460,000 S506,000 $552,000 revenues @ 46,000 launches FY 11 Cost to $498,733 $498,733 $498,733 $498,733 $498,733 $498,733 operate Boat Ramps Net cost to ($122,983) 515,017 561,017 5107,017 5153,017 5199,017 General Fund Table 2 There is a total of$145,750 budgeted for residential permits, commercial permits, parking fines, and boat slip rentals for FYII. In determining appropriate pricing for boat ramp operations so that revenues pay for operating expenses it is recommended to increase the launch fee to $8 daily. - ~ \ i (J .. : . i , .1. 16 lIB 13 June 29, 2009 out as much cost as we can and reduce the total budget of Collier County Government to the extent we can and maintain the services. Nobody wants to destroy the quality of life in Collier County. But the point is, if we don't look for new and innovative ways to deal with our budget challenges, you're right. Next year we're going to have a more serious problem, and the year after that probably equally serious. So we can't just say, okay, this is the way we've done it before, and I'm going to cut out adoption services, I'm going to cut out EMS, I'm going to stop picking up your garbage and all that sort of stuff, because people get the impression that you're just trying to scare them and that you've really got a lot of money that you haven't cut out of the budget. That's the normal reaction. And nobody would object to a $30 increase in taxes if they could maintain their same quality of services, but that's not what they're going to get hit with. It's going to be a lot more than that. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Well, I don't know what they're going to get hit with, but I'd like to see the figures before I jump to any conclusions. Anyway, we have to move on with parks and recreation. Let's get back to that subject, okay? COMMISSIONER HENNING: Madam Chair? CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Barry's cut out as much as he can. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Oh. COMMISSIONER HENNING: I don't know -- I don't know if we really need to hear it. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Let me interrupt you. There was a motion on the floor. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Right. CHAIRMAN FIALA: And a second. Page 222 1611Rl~ June 29, 2009 COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I was going to remind you. CHAIRMAN FIALA: And here we are. We're talking. Okay. There was a motion on the floor and a second to approve Marcy Krumbine's budget, right? Okay. Any further discussion? Uh-huh. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FIALA: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Aye. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Opposed? COMMISSIONER COYLE: Aye. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Aye. CHAIRMAN FIALA: 3-2. Okay. We've taken care of that one. Now, what were you saying about parks and rec? COMMISSIONER HENNING: I don't know why we're doing the process, but I don't want to belabor -- CHAIRMAN FIALA: But didn't we want to hear from each one? We've listened to everybody else. It wouldn't be fair to now skip Barry . COMMISSIONER HENNING: No. Let's hear from Barry. MS. RAMSEY: Unless you just want to give us 3 percent, and then we'll just move on. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Y eah. Well, that would be fine. MR. WILLIAMS : Well, Madam Chair, Commissioners, I'll certainly be brief. Just -- we followed the budget guidance that we had. We have a 3 percent and a 15 percent budget for you. Just to mention, and not to sound too much like whining, but as we've done that, we've also taken on Port of the Isles Marina. Goodland Boating Park is coming on January, 2010, and we're getting ready to take over the management of Freedom Park. Page 223 .'- .' " : \ 01 1611B13 June 29, 2009 And so we're like a lot of departments, doing more with less and reallocating our resources in order to support the need. So that's been our particular theme. I did want to mention, we did work with Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board very closely this year and got their approval for the budget. We've listed the different budget issues that equal the 15 percent. And certainly if you have any questions about that, I'll be happy to answer them. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. Commissioner Coletta? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I'm sorry. I was second. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Oh, I'm sorry. Okay. Put your button back on, would you? Commissioner Halas, excuse me. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Never mind. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. Commissioner Coletta? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: It's my turn anyway. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Yes, it is. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Yeah. Barry, I think you've done a wonderful job. I want to thank you very much for opening the new marina down there at Port of the Isles. It's beautiful. One question I do have, and I haven't seen anything on it in sometime, is when are county residents going to have access to the bass fishing lake up there by Orangetree? MR. WILLIAMS: We are working currently on design for the roadway. We are working with the school board as well. The property -- to access the property requires us to work very closely with them, and we've been in contact with them and had several meetings -- COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Oh. MR. WILLIAMS: -- in trying to finalize an agreement with them that would allow us access along the bus route at Palmetto Ridge High School. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Okay. And with that, I'd like to Page 224 16 , I 1 B 13 June 29, 2009 second Commissioner Henning's motion to approve your budget under the, what, millage -- not millage-neutral, but tax-neutral. That was your motion, right? COMMISSIONER HENNING: Yeah, but I'm removing it. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Oh, okay. Go ahead. I'll make the motion in a little bit. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. Commissioner Henning? COMMISSIONER HENNING: I do -- I want to share something with you. But before I do, you're proposing a minimal boat launch fee? MR. WILLIAMS: That's correct. COMMISSIONER HENNING: I don't know why we're cheaper than the private sector and -- on fees goes (sic), I don't -- on parks and rec, whether they need to justify them or not for running that operation. But if you're not -- definitely if the -- if the boat ramps are not paying for themselves, you know, with the $8 -- what is it, $8 or $5? MR. WILLIAMS : It's $5 currently. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Five dollars. MR. WILLIAMS: Proposing to eight. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Yeah. MS. RAMSEY: Yeah. It's the same as beach parking is currently. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Well, I'm going to get to beach parking in a minute, all right. MS. RAMSEY: I was trying not to go there. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Calusa Isle, I think, was $10 last time I went, and that was a year ago. You know, let's do the right thing there. But I also want to share something. A frustrated constituent -- I shared it with Leo Ochs, and it was just so good I'm not going to not share it with everybody else. Page 225 : , A ~ . , I ....,.L 16 I 1 1 ~ ~11h~9, 2009 Very frustrated about the beach parking fee proposal. Told him that it wasn't the Board of County Commissioners or anyone commissioner's idea. It's by law the state says the County Manager shall propose a balanced budget, and that was just part of it. And his suggestion was, on how to deal with it, whoever keeps on suggesting the beach parking fee, zero out their salary in the budget. That way we don't have to have it come back next year. And I just -- COMMISSIONER HALAS: Productivity Committee. COMMISSIONER HENNING: I just had to explain to them. I says, you know, we can't -- I don't know if we can really do that because we have an ordinance against that that somebody might take it the wrong way, but -- anyways. I'm not in favor of the beach parking fee. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Commissioner Coletta? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Can I make a comment? Yeah. You brought up something very interesting about boat parking, what it costs for -- and I'll be honest with you, I use Bayshore -- Bayview -- Bayview Park quite often. I go with my son. He's got the boat, so I have to pay for it, so I know what it is. And I also know when I go to Everglades City and the Oyster House and use their facility, what is it, 20? MS. RAMSEY: Twenty. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: $20. But it is a big discrepancy there. And I've talked to my fishing club about it before. And, of course, nobody likes to pay more, but I told him it's inevitable that eventually that point will come. What would the difference make of$2 this year, another $1 or so next year? Would it make much difference in the final outcome what we're working with? MS. RAMSEY: It's $120,000 to do the $3. And, you know, the boaters always look at us as being -- you know, discriminating against Page 226 I" , 16 11 8 13June29 2009 , them because they have to pay to launch and pay for their annual pass. And the -- if you're a resident and you get to go to the beach, you get to go there for free. So, you know -- COMMISSIONER HENNING: That's not true. That's not true. Take your boat and go to the beach. That's what I -- that's what I do with my wife, you know. I drop her off and my son and I go fishing. So that's not true. If they want to go to the beach, they can, by boat. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: But if we were to put a $2 charge additional, in other words, went from five to seven, which is still $13 below what private markets get in a lot of places, and they don't have as many amenities to offer as what the county does, what would happen? What would -- MS. RAMSEY: We can pick any number you want, Commissioner. We can pick eight -- COMMISSIONER COLETTA: No. I just want to know if it's going to make a difference. MS. RAMSEY: Yeah. It's like -- you know, it's $120,000 a year for a $3 increase, so divided by three and -- COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Okay. Do you think you could use some of that money to restore some of the fish-cleaning stations? MS. RAMSEY: Well, that's over there. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: So you're the man that took them away? MR. McALPIN: We would need to work with DEP on their permitting for the fish-cleaning situations, but we are. And the new facilities going in, we're having -- COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I mean, if you're going to raise the dam boat fee, you better give them something for their money. Well-- CHAIRMAN FIALA: You tell them. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Yeah. Well, are we going to get a motion on this? Page 227 ," ( , , - ..~ J.. 16 11 B ~?e29 2009 , CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. About parks and rec, you mean? MS. RAMSEY: The whole division as a unit? Pushing it, I know but-- , COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I'm sorry. One more time. MS. RAMSEY: I was looking for a motion on the whole division as a unit. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Well, I think we've probably got to go through it, because we're not in a hurry to get out of here. It's only quarter after six, 19 after six. CHAIRMAN FIALA: You know, we haven't heard from -- did the Productivity Committee have anything on parks and rec? MS. VASEY: Oh, I covered it this morning. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay, fine. Very good. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Okay. Well, then motion to approve parks and rec budget and to allow them to increase the boat parking to $7. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay, second. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: You didn't think I could do that, Commissioner Coy Ie, did you? COMMISSIONER COYLE: What, make a motion? COMMISSIONER HENNING: I don't know what it means. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: You did promise the free entertainment. You're doing very good with it. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Motion-- CHAIRMAN FIALA: The motion to -- COMMISSIONER HENNING: -- to tax-neutral or -- CHAIRMAN FIALA: Oh, he didn't say that. Is -- the question is, is the motion tax-neutral, millage-neutral or what? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Tax-neutral. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. Now, does that mean we charge for a -- MS. RAMSEY: No. The 3 percent does not have the beach fees Page 228 16 /1 ~3 June 29, 2009 in it. CHAIRMAN FIALA: No beach fees. MR. WILLIAMS: Doesn't have boat launch. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Beach fees are still free, right? MS. RAMSEY: That's correct. The 3 percent does not have the beach fees in it. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. MS. RAMSEY: Or the boat launch fee either, for that matter. CHAIRMAN FIALA: But we -- but this -- now this is -- this increase would be the boat launch fee, right? MS. RAMSEY: You want the 3 percent budget plus the boat launch fee; is that correct? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Plus the boat. MS. RAMSEY: At $7. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: At $7. MS. RAMSEY: Okay, sir. I understand. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: It was Commissioner Henning's idea, but I'm just carrying it forward. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Now, the 3 percent did not have a boat launch fee before? MS. RAMSEY: It doesn't have an increase to the boat launch fee. The increase to the boat launch fee was in the 15 percent reduction, millage-neutral. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. So what you're saying is increase it to $7? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FIALA: So motion on the floor is to approve the parks and recreation budget in the tax-neutral category and raise the boat launch fee from $5 to $7. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FIALA: And that was my second. Any discussion? Yes, Commissioner Coyle. Page 229 0{' .. \ i ~" ". \ , ~}' "' t"' B 1 16 I 1 June 29~009 COMMISSIONER COYLE: And that isn't tax-neutral, because you just generated some more revenue on top of the tax-neutral. So once agaIn -- COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Geez, can't do anything right. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Well, no. It's -- you know, we've got -- we've got to be accurate here. MS. RAMSEY: I would take that motion -- this is just me -- that we would go to the tax-neutral, increase the fee and then reduce something else to counter the taxes. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Okay. So if you implemented the higher fee -- MS. RAMSEY: Right. COMMISSIONER COYLE: -- you're going to take that amount of money and reduce your overall expenses so that you are tax- neutral? MS. RAMSEY: Right, minus 3 percent. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Okay. MS. RAMSEY: That's the way I understood that. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Okay. That's not really what was said -- MS. RAMSEY: Okay. COMMISSIONER COYLE: -- but if that's the intent, I would agree with that. I won't vote in favor of it, but I would agree with that. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: No, that wasn't my intent. I'm looking for the fish-cleaning stations, to be honest with you. And I thought out of this we might be able to come up with enough dollars. You wouldn't believe how inconvenient it is to have to take whole fish home with you and clean them in your kitchen sink with your wife watching you wondering when you're going to clean up the mess. COMMISSIONER COYLE: I've got a cost-savings suggestion. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Catch and release. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Why don't we just have the staff Page 230 16 I 18 1 ~une 29, 2009 catch the blasted fish and sell them there right at the launching ramp and people won't even have to put their boat in the water. CHAIRMAN FIALA: It's getting late, folks. I have a motion on the floor and a second. Commissioner Coletta, are you finished, or is that another button? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Finished. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. Commissioner Henning? COMMISSIONER HENNING: Why -- I mean, I would like to justify a fee. I think that's one thing that we need to do, Mr. Klatzkow; is that correct? And just tell us what the operational costs are of the boat ramps, the users, and come back with a recommendation. Mr. Klatzkow? MR. KLATZKOW: Okay. I think you're going to find that $7 more than covers it, I mean, from what I'm hearing, just the cost of putting these things together. But yes, to justify a fee, I think, is a good idea always. MR. WILLIAMS: Just if I could add, the justification, you know, if you do look at what the private sector charges versus our rates, I mean, that's one level of justification. Your beach and water fund is subsidized at 45 percent. So if you were to increase your fee from five to seven, you're going to -- your subsidy wouldn't be quite as much, but there -- it'd still be there. MS. RAMSEY: Right. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Government needs to justify fees. MR. WILLIAMS: Absolutely. COMMISSIONER HENNING: We can't justify it because, you know, the guy down the street is charging more. So I would like to see something in writing of what the operational costs are, because it might be $10. I don't know. And we Page 23 1 . (. ..... : \ d i -" \,- 16 I 1 B 13 June 29 2009 , can make that decision then. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I got all evening, but I only did it at your suggestion, when you were originally starting the discussion, to try to gain your faith again so we could keep going forward; however, with that, since the motion hasn't been voted on, I take out the suggestion of a $2 increase of fee and I leave that just for approval of the budget under the revenue-neutral scenario. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Tax-neutral? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Tax-neutral. I wished I could-- well, we can't do that, that's right. So that's going to be my motion. The other part's off. You bring it back at some future time and we'll discuss it. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. Bring it back at a future time. Okay. MS. RAMSEY: Okay. CHAIRMAN FIALA: All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Aye. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Opposed? COMMISSIONER COYLE: Aye. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Aye. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay, 3-2. All right. Now, next we have our public health unit. You got your hair cut. DR. COLFER: Good evening. I did, summer. Good evening. I'm Joan Colfer, director of the Collier County Health Department. Our budget request is -- for our total budget is $14.6 million. The county's contribution is only 1.7. And I'm really missing Mr. Mudd, Leo, because this is usually when he tells you all that I am the best bargain that you're ever going to see, that you only pay 11.6 percent of Page 232 ," '. " 16 It! B 13 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RE- ESTABLISHING THE COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FACILITIES AND OUTDOOR AREAS LICENSE AND FEE POLICY AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 2010-25 AND All OTHER RESOLUTIONS ESTABLISHING LICENSE AND FEE POLICIES. WHEREAS, on February 9, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopted Resolution 2010-25, superseding prior resolutions in order to revise and re-establish the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Facilities and Outdoor Areas License and Fee Policy; and WHEREAS, the Director of Parks and Recreation recommends revIsing and re- establishing Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Facilities and Outdoor Areas License and Fee Policy in order to increase Boat Launch Facilities Fees from $5.00 to $8.00; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners hereby accepts the recommendations of the Director of Parks and Recreation. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY THAT: The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Facilities and Outdoor Areas License and Fee Policy is hereby established as follows. This Policy supersedes the Policy as established in Resolution No. 2010-25 and all previous resolutions establishing license and fee policy. I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to ensure maximum use of facilities, outdoor areas and programs in Collier County and provide equitable fees and charges collected from users of such facilities, outdoor areas or programs. II. LIMITATIONS The Parks and Recreation Director, or designee, may waive enforcement or application of any of these regulations or restrictions with respect to any facility, outdoor areas, or program provided such waiver does not interfere with public safety or enjoyment. No fees may be waived. No non-government entity shall charge an admission fee to any out of doors event, including aquatic facilities. The Board of County Commissioners shall set fees and charges for all facilities and programs. i ~ : .t \. FISCAL IMPACT: If adopted revenue would be included in the FY 11 budget and is estimated at $138,000. 1611 Br3 GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact on the Growth Management Plan. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient for Board action. - CMG RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County approves a revision and re-establishing of the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Facilities and Outdoor Areas License and Fee Policy in order to increase Boat Launch Facilities Fees to $8 at all Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Parks and Marinas. PREPARED BY: Sidney Kittila, Operations Coordinator ~- (' \ CJ I .. 16 \ ~ 13 Consistent with Collier County's policy of ensuring all citizens equal opportunity to participate in programs, any resident requesting special consideration must substantiate to the Parks and Recreation Director proof of financial need. All information provided is not confidential but will be used only for the purpose of establishing reduced or waived program fees. Rates and charges can be modified on a case-by-case basis if approved by the Director of Parks and Recreation for special promotional sales and advertisements to stimulate increased utilization of programs. III. CLASSIFICATIONS A. Facility License Definitions and Uses 1. Outdoor Areas: Open space or land owned or leased by the Parks and Recreation Department. Such outdoor areas shall include, but not limited to, sports fields, playgrounds, swimming pools and/or other park and recreation land areas, excluding Golden Gate Community Center. (As to Golden Gate Community Center, refer to Section Q, herein). Outdoor areas shall be used for those purposes designated or implicit in their character. Any deviation from normal appropriate use shall require express prior permission from the Parks and Recreation Director or designee. 2. Facilities: Buildings and dwellings owned or leased by the Parks and Recreation Department. Such facilities include, but are not restricted to, community center areas and rooms, gymnasiums, pavilions, shelters, and other areas located in the Parks and Recreation structures, excluding the Golden Gate Community Center. (As to Golden Gate Community Center, refer to Section Q, herein). Facilities shall be used for those purposes designated or implicit in their character. Any deviation from these intended normal uses shall require express prior permission from the Parks and Recreation Director, or designee. 3. Programs: Recreation activities conducted on land or in facilities owned or leased by Collier County. Such activities include, but are not restricted to: athletic, clinic, instructional and interpretative seminars for preschool, youth, adult, senior and special populations. Any deviation from these intended normal uses shall require express permission from the Parks and Recreation Director, or designee. 4. Vehicle Parking Fees: Parking lots at Collier County beach parks and accesses, to include, but not limited to, the following: Tigertail Beach, Barefoot Beach Access, Barefoot Beach Preserve, Clam Pass Park, Conner Park, Vanderbilt Beach, North Gulf Shore Access, and South Marco Beach Access. 2 1611813 5. Boat Launch Fees: Ramp use at Collier County owned and operated boat launch facilities to include, but not limited to, Bayview Park, Cocohatchee River Park, Caxambas Park, and Collier Boulevard Boating Park. B. User Categories - Applicable to all indoor and outdoor areas Governmental entities are not subject to fees. All other facility users shall have their fees determined by the category of the entity. Note: All parks shall remain open to the public. The two categories are: 1. Category I - Federal Income Tax Exempt Entities, Registered Charities, Not- for-Profit Groups. a. Federal Income Tax Exempt Entities Groups that are exempt from taxation under any subsection of Section 501 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code. The following civic associations will not be subject to fees for their one general membership meeting per month: East Naples Civic Association, Golden Gate Estates Civic Association, Golden Gate Civic Association, Immokalee Civic Association, and Second District Association. b. Specified Sales Tax Exempt Entities Those entities that are exempt from Florida sales taxes pursuant to Subsection 212.08 (7), Florida Statutes such as a home for the aged, nursing home, hospice, or an organization whose primary purpose is to provide special educational, cultural, recreational, or social benefits to minors, or is a religious, charitable, scientific, educational, or veterans' organization. c. Local Not-for-Profit Groups or Non-Profit Groups Entities, irrespective of tax exempt status, which are not-for-profit corporations, organizations or other not-for-profit entities that are of Collier County origin, have their principal location in Collier County, and of which fifty per cent (50%) of the group's membership are residents of Collier County, with a primary purpose to provide social services to others or to protect interests outside of the group, such as the environment, endangered animals, disadvantaged persons, or some other similar external interest. The primary focus of these groups is outward looking and away from the personal interests of the group's members. d. Other Local Not-for-Profit Groups Those entities, irrespective of tax exempt status, which are not-for-profit corporations, organizations or other not-for-profit entities that are of Collier 3 -' i I ! , "- .~ ; "-.,; 16 11 B 13 County origin, have their principal location in Collier County, and of which fifty per cent (50%) of the group's membership are residents of Collier County, but the group's primary purpose is not to provide social services to individuals who are not bona fide members of the group or is not to protect interests outside of the group. This category includes property owners' associations, political groups, and all other special interest oriented teams or clubs such as hobbyists' clubs, chess clubs, radio clubs, hunters and fishermen clubs, stamp, coin, and other collectors' clubs; garden clubs, car clubs, and all other similar clubs, groups or organizations. The primary focus of these groups is inward toward the group's members. 2. Category 11- All Others A. Each individual, group, organization or entity that is not within Category I. IV. FEE STRUCTURE - (All fees are exclusive of sales taxes unless otherwise noted). A. Category I User Fees Facility Rates (excluding league play and special facilities; Le., swimming pool, etc.) Facility Type Rate Per Security Hour Deposit Indoor Room under 1,500 sq ft $10.00 $50.00 Indoor Room 1,501 - 3,000 sq ft $15.00 $100.00 Indoor Room 3,001 sq ft & over $20.00 $100.00 Gymnasium $30.00 $100.00 Small Pavilion $10.00 $25.00 Large Pavilion $20.00 $25.00 NCRP Indoor Room under 1,500 sq ft $15.00 $50.00 NCRP Indoor Room 1,501-3,000 sq ft $25.00 $100.00 NCRP Indoor Room 3,001 sq ft & over $50.00 $100.00 NCRP Gymnasium (per court) $30.00 $100.00 Sugden Amphitheater $30.00 $60.00 Open Green Space (100 x 100) $10.00 n/a Athletic Facilities for General Use (Le. $20.00 $80.00 Special Events, Picnics, Carnivals, etc.) Athletic Facilities for Athletic Use $15.00 n/a (F ootball/Soccer, Soft/Baseball , Little League, Sports Pavilion, Roller Hockey) Basketball/RacquetballNolleyball1T en nis $5.00 n/a Courts Sugden Regional Park for a Countywide $800 per $200.00 Event day Immokalee Airport Park for a County $500.00 $200.00 wide Event per day 4 16 , 1 8"13 1. Rental fees do not include setup and break down of facility. An additional $20.00 per hour per staff person charge will apply should you require this servIce. 2. The security deposit will be refunded in full if the facility is returned in the condition in which it was received. B. Category II User Fees 1. Facility Rates (excluding special facilities; i.e., swimming pool, etc.) Facility Type Rate Per Security Hour Deposit Indoor Room under 1,500 sq ft $25.00 $50.00 Indoor Room 1,501 - 3,000 sq ft $45.00 $100.00 Indoor Room 3,001 sq ft & over $60.00 $100.00 Gymnasium $60.00 $100.00 NCRP Indoor Room under 1,500 sq ft $40.00 $50.00 NCRP Indoor Room 1,501-3,000 sq ft $80.00 $100.00 NCRP Indoor Room 3,001 sq ft & over $125.00 $100.00 NCRP Gymnasium (per court) $60.00 $100.00 Small Pavilion $10.00 $25.00 Large Pavilion $20.00 $25.00 Sugden Amphitheater $60.00 $60.00 Sugden Green Space $60.00 n/a Open Green Space (100 x 100) $20.00 n/a Athletic Facilities for General Use (i.e. $30.00 $80.00 Special Events, Picnics, Carnivals, etc.) Athletic Facilities for Athletic Use $25.00 n/a (Football/Soccer, Soft/Baseball , Little Leaque, Sports Pavilion, Roller Hockey) Basketball/RacquetballNolleyballff en n is $12.00 n/a Courts Lights $10.00 n/a Sugden Regional Park for a Countywide $1,200 per $200.00 Event day Immokalee Airport Park for a $1 ,000 per $200.00 Countywide event day 1. Rental fees do not include setup and break down of facility. An additional $20.00 per hour per staff person charge will apply should you require this service. 2. The security deposit will be refunded in full if the facility is returned in the condition in which it was received. 5 ...- ,- . , , , ~.. ' ; \ ~ I n' , ',; j 16 11 B 13 C. Additional Fees: Categories I and II Service Additional Fee Per Hour Rental during non-business $20.00 hours (hours that are not normal departmental operation) Additional non-security staff $15.00 per staff member members Additional security staff members Special requests or additional clean up required $20.00 per hour per staff member needed as determined by department Per hour fee determined by department, based on cost D. Beach Parking Facilities Fees; Boat launch Facilities Fees 1. Beach Parking Facilities Fees Beach parking facilities, including and not limited to, Barefoot Beach Preserve, Barefoot Beach Access, Clam Pass Park, Conner Park, North Gulf Shore Access, Tigertail Beach, South Marco Beach Access have a parking fee, inclusive of sales tax, at a rate of $8.00 per day. Collier County residents may obtain a beach parking permit at no charge. Permits will be valid for 2 years. Vehicles with permits will be exempt from daily parking fees at all beach parking facilities. This permit will be affixed on the bottom, inside, driver's side of the windshield. Organizations operating excursion or shuttle services will be charged double the per vehicle per day fee. 2. Boat Launch Facilities Fees Boat launch facilities, including and not limited to, Caxambas Park, Cocohatchee River Park, Collier Boulevard Boating Park, and Bayview Park, shall have a launch fee, inclusive of sales tax, at a rate of $5:00 $8.00 per launch per day. All residents and visitors may purchase boat launch permits for an annual fee of $75.00. These permits are available at all Collier County Parks and Recreation Community Centers. Commercial permits for launch facilities may be acquired at the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Administration Office for a cost of $100.00 per vehicle plus the ~ $8.00 fee per launch or $500.00 per commercial entity with no launch fee required. Commercial entities purchasing the $500.00 permit are eligible to use up to 5 vehicles for launches. Additional vehicle permits must be purchased for $100.00 each. All permits are good from January 1 to December 31. 6 16 11 B 13 E. Concession Fees 1. For Each concession booth/location in conjunction with rental (except for NCRP) a $20.00 fee per day or 20% of gross revenues per day, whichever is greater, for each concession booth or location. 2. Concessionaires contracted by the County to serve the general public will pay a negotiated fee in lieu of the general facility use fee schedule. 3. Organizations operating concessions for Collier County co-sponsored leagues will be charged $5.00 per hour of operation. F. Reserved G. Instructional Fees (Contractual Instructors) 1. Programs Fee Assessment: per hour or per participant basis. 2. Non-Staff Instructor(s): The County shall pay 65% to the non-staff instructor(s) and 35% to the County for all such instructional programs conducted on Collier County facilities. 3. The pro-ration for instructional programs conducted on non-county facilities shall be 70% to the non-staff instructor(s) and 30% to the County. H. Athletics 1. Collier County Parks and Recreation Leagues Program Minimum registration fee per participant per league play Adult Youth $30.00 $30.00 Leagues charged on a fee per participant basis may require a sponsor fee. Alternately, leagues may be charged a combined sponsor and players' fee per team as follows: Men's Softball Women's Softball Church Leagues Men's 35 Co-Ed & One Pitch Softball Men's Soccer Co-Ed Soccer Adult Flag Football $860.00 $540.00 $710.00 $760.00 $610.00 $650.00 $400.00 $500.00 7 ~: n . t ;1 '. . I .1 () 1 16 , 1 .~ 13 Leagues will not be charged field rental fees for practices and games during scheduled league season. 2. Collier County Parks and Recreation Co-sponsored Leagues Fees are applicable to Category I users only. League Type Fee per participant per league play $30.00 $1.00 per registered youth per week all- of league play Adult Youth (includes play-offs or star play) 3. Clinics/Camps: a. For clinics conducted on any County facility, 65% of the fees go to the group or individual(s) and 35% of the fees go to the County. b. For clinics conducted on any non-County facility, 70% of the fees to the group or individual(s) and 30% of the fees to the County. c. If the clinic is free of charge to participants, regular facility rental fees will apply. 4. Tournament Fees Fees will be determined on a tournament-by-tournament basis based on, but not limited to, the following criteria: direct operational costs, duration of tournament, staffing, merchandise sales, category status, sponsored or co- sponsored parking and food concessions. I. Collier County Racquet Centers: 1. Pelican Bay Community Park Tennis Facility Rate $10.00 per person per 1% hr $377.36 $662.00 $38.00 $65.00 $5.00 members $10.00 non-members The above court fees and membership rates do not include sales tax. Service Court Fees Single Annual Membership Couple Annual Membership % Hour Private Lesson 1 Hour Private Lesson Round Robins 8 16 t 1 B 13 J. Collier County Aquatic Facilities Key to abbreviations: GGAC=Golden Gate Aquatic Complex, ISC=lmmokalee Sports Complex, SNF = Sun-N-Fun Lagoon Family is defined as an adult and, if any, his or her spouse living in the same household, and/or, if any, his or her legal dependents under 18 years of age living in the same household. Fee for Non-Collier County public schools and colleges and universities during regular operating hours is $35.00 per hour unless superseded by separate agreement. Collier County Public Schools are fee exempt; however, they are required to pay $15.00 per hour per lifeguard or instructor, if not during regular operating hours. This fee exemption does not apply to the Sun-N-Fun Lagoon. Rain Check Policy: Upon paid receipt of admission at any Aquatics facility a rain check is issued after 30 minutes have elapsed upon signal from the facility that the pools must be cleared due to inclement weather. This rain check is only valid for individuals who present a paid receipt of admission to the cashier or designee that indicates the individual paid for their admission within a 90 minute time period prior to the signal of clearing the pools. 1. Entrance Fees (inclusive of sales tax) (plus applicable sales tax) 3years Senior Discount and Under 48" Over (60+yrs) under 48" GGAC Free $2.50 $3.00 $2.50 Show a ISC Free $1.00 $1.50 $1.00 Collier SNF Free $5.50 $10.00 $8.00 County Driver's .$12.00 License and receive a $2.00 discount off the over 48" admission fee 9 l '\ f ~ ,.. i i 01: I" l ;.{.. "-. \_ J 2. Pass Fees (inclusive of sales tax) 16 11 B 13 Type Under Over 48" Senior Family 48" GGAC 3 $40.00 $60.00 $40.00 $100.00 month ISC 3 $35.00 $55.00 $35.00 $ 90.00 month GGAC Annual ** $60.00 $80.00 $60.00 $140.00 ISC Annual ** $50.00 $75.00 . $50.00 $125.00 SNF Annual ** $80.00 $110.00 $80.00 $190.00 No corporate discounts on pool passes. Annual pass rates are for Collier County residents only. ** Please check dates and hours of operation at facility. 3. Swimming Instructional Fees GGAC % hour $40.00 participant % hour $45.00 participant hour $45.00 participant $15.00 per % hour per ISC $10.00 participant $15.00 participant $15.00 participant n/a per Children's classes Children's classes Adult classes Private Lessons per per per % per 4. Pool Rentals GGAC & ISC (exclusive of sales tax) Each pool includes one staff member. One pool $50.00 first hour Each additional hour $35.00 per hour Each additional pool $35.00 per hour per pool Additional staff $15.00 per hour per lifeguard 5. Sun-N-Fun Lagoon Fees Group/Facility Rental Fees User Rate Members of groups of 20 or $4.25 plus tax daily fee more who are less than 48 inches tall Members of groups of 20 or $7.55 plus tax daily fee more who 48 inches tall or taller Entire Facility Rental Partial Facility Rental $1500 per hour, 2-hour minimum $1000 each additional hour includes staff $200 per hour, per pool (excluding lazy river) $300 for lazy river No exceptions are made to Collier County Aquatic Facility rates. 10 16 I 1a 13 K. Collier County Fitness Centers Key to abbreviations: GGCP=Golden Gate Community Park, ISC=lmmokalee Sports Complex, NCRP=North Collier Regional Park, MHCP=Max Hasse Community Park, VTCP=Veterans Community Park 2. Fitness passes are available in a three-tiered system, with passes offering use of facilities as follows: Facility Daily Fee Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Pass Pass Pass NCRP Fitness $7 yes no no GGCP Fitness $7 yes yes no MHCP Fitness $7 yes yes no VTCP Fitness $4 yes yes yes ISC Fitness $4 yes yes yes GGCP Pool Above see J yes yes no ISC Pool Above see J yes yes yes NCRP Lap Above see J no no no Pool 2. Fees associated with the pass types above are as follows. Daily walk-in and membership fees are subject to 6% sales tax. Monthl 3-Month Annual Spouse of Additional Family Member (includes college students up to 25 years of age) Student (ages 13-18, students ages 13 to 14 must be accompanied b an adult Tier 1 $35 $100 $300 $165 Tier 2 $33 $90 $250 $140 Tier 3 $20 $50 $160 $100 $125 $100 $75 3. Baby-sitting Service $3.00 per child per use $20.00 per 10-visit card Babysitting service is offered limited hours at Golden Gate Community Park Fitness and North Collier Regional Park Fitness. 11 ...... l · f \ >- t. '.. t I .. '\ . (-, '. ( , ,~.- . 16 I 1 B 13 4. Corporate Discount on Annual Passes Discount does not apply to additional family members. Discount is based on employee participation, as follows: Employees 5-9 10 - 24 25 and above Discount 10% 20% 40% L. Skate Parks Annual Membership for Age 21 and under $10 Annual Membership for Age 22 and older $25 M. Collier County Summer Camps, After School Programs, and Collier County Parks and Recreation Specialty Camps 1. Summer Camp (9 week session) 9-week session $600.00 (each additional child) $540.00 1-week session $85.00 10% discount on each additional child from the same household after the first. 2. After School Camps Session- 19 weeks 20 weeks $475.00 $500.00 Transportation cost per week is additional and will be based on the current transportation contract. 3. Holiday Camps 1-day camp 1- week camp $15.00 $85.00 4. Collier County Parks and Recreation Specialty Camps Additional specialty camp fees are competitive market prices based on hours and type of instruction. Ranger Camp per week Ski Camp per two weeks Sailing camp per two weeks $100.00 $250.00 $250.00 12 16 1'1 B 13 N. Refund Policy a. Programs and Classes Satisfaction Guarantee Policy -If you are not satisfied with a class or are unable to participate for any reason, please contact us immediately. Our policy is to provide a 100% credit or refund (your choice) to anyone who makes a WRITTEN request before the start of the second class. Requests received after the second class will entitle participants to a prorated refund. Prorated refunds will be based on the number of classes remaining at the time the written application for refund is made. This offer does not include adult sports leagues or supplies purchased for the class. b. Facility Rentals If you are not satisfied with a facility or inclement weather prohibits usage, a written request must be submitted within 48 hours. The department Director or designee will make a determination if the refund will be granted. c. Point of Sale Refund If you are not satisfied with a facility or a service provided by the department, your request for a refund will be reviewed by the supervisor on duty. Current Finance Department refund policies will be followed. O. Memorial Bench and Tree Donations 3. $2,000 Bench 2. $500 Tree P. Fines for Park and Beach Citations Chapter 89-440 Laws of Florida authorizes the Board of County Commissioners to designate employees of Collier County Parks and Recreation Department as Park Rangers. The Board of County Commissioners has granted Collier County Park Rangers with certain powers and duties, through Section 246-28 the Code of Laws and Ordinances. Chapter 97-347 (Special Act) as amended by Chapter 2006- 337 further authorizing Park Rangers to write citations to appear before the Special Master. 80-47- Parking Citation 80-47- Handicap Parking Citation 76-48- Domestic Animals $35 $250 $30 13 ? ,~ , ; :.~ '\ \ 0 t 16 11 8 '13 t I 76-48- Littering 76-48- Intoxicating Beverages 76-48- Glass Containers 76-48- Fires 76-48- Sea Turtles - Structure on Beach no Interaction 76-48- Sea Turtles - Interruption of Nesting 76-48- Sea Turtles - Grievous Harm Caused 76-48- Sea Turtles - Artificial Lighting/Non-Compliance 3.11.4-Gopher Tortoise Infraction (Land Development Code) 76-48- Loud Music 76-48- Nudity 76-48- Indecent Exposure 76-48- Blasphemous Language 76-48- Chumming and Blood Baiting 76-48- Protection & Preservation of Wildlife 76-48- Camping 76-48- Driving Motorized/Non-Motorized Vehicle/Beach 76-48- Deface or Disfigure County Property 76-48- Protection of Vegetation 76-48- Soliciting 76-48- Removal of Live, Natural Objects 76-48- Removal of Cultural Resources 76-48- Firearms $100 $75 $100 $100 $250 $500 $1,000 $500 up to $500 $100 $100 $100 $50 $75 $50 $75 $75 $250* $50 $100 $100 $100 $100 *AII efforts will be made to ensure individuals who disfigure or deface County property in addition to the fines cited above pay for the property damage. Q. Golden Gate Community Center 1. Golden Gate Taxing District Boundaries: West Boundary: Santa Barbara Boulevard to Logan Boulevard to First Avenue SW East Boundary: canal 1 mile east of County Road 951 North Boundary: First Avenue SW over 951 Boulevard and White Boulevard to the canal located 1 mile east of County Road 951 South Boundary: Palm Springs subdivision and Radio Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard 2. User Categories Class I: Charitable, Not-for-Profit organizations Class II: Not-for-Profit organizations Class III: Civic organizations 14 16 , 1 B 13 Class IV: Commercial or For-Profit organizations and any other group or individual 3. Deposit Fees Auditorium All Other Rooms $200.00 $ 50.00 4. Rental Fees A. Rooms A, B, C, D Category within District Class I No charge Class II No charge Class III Class IV (<1,500 sq ft) (1,501-3,000) (3,001 +) B. Auditorium Category Class I & III Class II Class IV outside District No charge approved by Board No charge No charge $10.00/hour $15.00/ hour $20.00/ hour $25.00/ hour $45.00/ hour $60.00/ hour within District outside District No charge No charge approved by Board approved by Board $20.00/hr < 10 pm $60.00/hr < 10 pm $40.00/hr 10 pm + $80.00/hr 10 pm + C. Wheels Amphitheater and Open Area Fees charged in accordance with the Sugden Regional Park Fee Policy for Use for Countywide Events. D. Gymnasium Category Class I Fund Raising Class II Fund Raising General Fee $30.00 per hour any size $20.00 added to rate above $60.00 per hour any size $20.00 added to rate above Classes III, IV will be required to pay sales tax. 5. Service and Sale of Alcoholic Beverages A. Serving of Alcoholic Beverages These provisions apply for any event where alcoholic beverages will be available. No alcohol may be made available without a valid 15 .-'" 16 , 1813 Certificate of Insurance on file at the Golden Gate Community Center. User categories Class I and Class II, as previously defined in Q(2), above, the user must present a General Liability Policy for the date of use which specifically includes contractual liability and host liquor liability in an amount not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) at least four (4) weeks prior to the event. As determined by the County Risk Management Director, in the event of above average exposure Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) liability coverage shall be required. In the event of unusual or high exposure One Million Dollar ($1,000,000) liability shall be required. B. Sale of Alcoholic Beverages In the event any user intends to sell alcoholic beverages, they will be required to meet all State requirements regarding the sale of alcohol and obtain all required permits. Copies of said permits shall be filed with the Community Center Supervisor. The Center Supervisor shall contact Collier County Department of Risk Management for insurance requirements. C. Rules and Regulations for Users Serving Alcoholic Beverages 1. It is the responsibility of the user that no alcoholic beverage shall be allowed outside assigned meeting room(s) auditorium. 2. The user is responsible to ascertain that no alcoholic beverage shall be served to any person under the age of 21. 3. The user shall be responsible for the behavior of any parties with the user's group. 4. The user shall be responsible to assure that no alcoholic beverages are served during the last thirty (30) minutes of user's scheduled event. 5. The use r will be responsible for supplying a Certificate of Insurance at least four (4) weeks prior to scheduled event (see insurance provisions). 6. The user will be responsible to comply with Chapter 562, Florida Statues. 16 .-\ , , .- ,,- 16 Ii lB 13 7. The user must abide by all other operational policies and procedures of the Golden Gate Community Center. Any violation of any of these rules can result in termination of the event. 8. The user must pay the cost of security provided by the Collier County Sheriff's Office. The fee is payable to Collier County Parks and Recreation at the time of payment for facility use. R. Scholarship/Sliding Fee Scale If applicable, scholarships are available based on a sliding fee schedule. Please see attachment B for income and sliding fee scale rates. Sliding Fee Scale rates are based on Federal Poverty Limit guidelines and are adjusted annually as part of the resolution. Proof of income is verified through wage statements, W-2's, etc. A copy of the fee rules, as hereby amended, is attached. This revised policy shall be effective upon approval by the Board of County Commissioners. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED this motion, second and majority vote. day of , 2010, after ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Colleen M.Greene Assistant County Attorney 10-PKR-00215/2 17 , I \- J. I 0 f 16 11 B 13 Master Plan ---.------ .-. --. --'- 1611313 Exhibit A Collier County Parks and RecreZltion Master Plan May 3, 2010 Scope of Services The Collier Ccurlt'! [':'lrk', ;,', I'l'u(-",L,_'!! Lk::,'lll11':nt':. fc:ecls is to prcwide tile public, both residents 2nd visitors, ,--,}itll L1lliquu !t:c.r(<~t[(!1 t'"pU:(;i;~CS 1 he County's parks and recreJtion bcilities ccntribuk to thi,' !:Cc;llh ~,i lhe l(;mii'Uillty'S residents, enhance the Intpgrit'l clnd fjLlJlitv cf th,' ndtur,d el,'iir(,nnl,_'nt tin:1 ,rUract \'isitors to the community, thereby contributlnf: tu Inc"l tOUrl"i11 d1c! "L()I1C)'lliL di".',"!cpnknL. To optimize the Countv's existing pJrks "I,d rCClt'JtilJf1 ! t,",uur,>"') ,we! ,]Sset), ,1S '-'Iell as strategically plan for till' future, tfw County IS illkrc:',tf'd i:1 pl'cpJril'(~" Pdrks and Recreation Master Plan, The master planning pre,c,:')', i:, cksi,,',I1fc'!l 1c1 \,'11: l:r,' t',at Ce,!ii,,'r Count'!') legacy of parks and upell Spc;C;('" ':Iill u\I~,tiillle 1I':k, th' ill' "r''', To facilitate tl1is effc)rt. (()llld (,).,Jllt)' ,n ,CCH~,dCk:: i 1:-,r>J!:' Oil'.'2!" 8, Associates, Inl. (TOA) to pl'epale this Scope' of 5('[\::,-,", it hl'!rJ ,;(,IC> rhe' dp\'elopl1lent of the Master PI,m [hi, scope <JntlcIIBt2'; thzll til" ck.."ILipn,:llt' ,f tn,' Pelf ks "nd RecreZltion Master Plan will be cOlnplc:ucd cwcurrent ':Iid) In", C'.liiel Coullt'/ ~,1askr I'vlobilit'! Plan Jnd that parallel rl'sou!"ces '.'Jill bl' rc1cIXf;cc1 c1iirl utl!i~erl, as ,:,qpt':pr'att> This Scope of Spr\/ices is l.:rgzilli.crllllt'J the' hil;)':,II', Fish' . Tdsk 1 - He'lie.'i ()[ rlalls "wl [)(;CUi"r,ellt., . Task 2 - E'Idlu..ltIOil ut EXi"1.:n,:: !1l\,'-"lc ,I ,P:C . r ,lsk :3 - ~.jecci~) .0..'S'S~~_}<;f:nic'nt . Task ,1 - MClster 1-' dll De\:~;iGp'~1eIH Task 1 - Review of Plans and Documents Task 1,1- Data ~,jeecls I'vlemc: Upon rru'ipt of the Nutlu; tu P!"cce"c1, ,1 dau rFeus 11i','li1CJ ',vii! be developed and sent to the Project iYlanager. To the extent pCSSlble. tl1:' (LitiJ rt'r:u"stec! should be provided to the Consultant prier to the project kiCK-oft 1":1t',,1 in=', '),' th,1t ,:11'1'( questions or issues with the data, as 'sell ,15 Jiny missll'lo, dJt:I e:l d,lLl ::~lpS (<3n be discussed during the kick- off meeting, Task 1.2 - Proiecr Klcl(-Oif i\lec'til'~ fhe ConsL'ltant 'i. 'iI T.'3c,I,Ute a "-ick--lff 111 """T; ",3 :,['[' ",'e'l n1'~1~1:J('rS c:f Count'( staff to recei',e 3veJi\ahle ri'!f,-"Im::be'ii r",:"t;:,j tii ti,p r)Cn r:,r, and discuss any technical -,-~----~~. .~~.-------~----~---_. T'lndl~!C-O\:,'v,t_~; ':J_ r\:::;"~~:_ . ~ ( Collier County :J "" ;irc! H"uC'J(,OI1 Master Plan ~.l;i'i .!(} 10 -_.-.----------~---- ------- .' . 16 I 313 , . I and policy issues, looldindtf.:' staff/Consultant r(~spc'nsibilities, and refine the project schedule, Ttw Conc,ultant VJIII summarize data saps and responsibilities resulting from the kickoff ll1ect'nl; I;,Jsk 1.3_.::_fl._~,:!i~-':1 of Plans and Documents This task includes a I e';:1' "'! at plJf1S and documents thC1t ~Irf~ pertinent to the de'Jelopnwnt of thE' rvldstu PL'HI_ Tim rt.'vit":1 incluclr:,s, but is not limited to the follmving: . 2U07, :2.UOO, 200'-1 j'I,nnudllnvE'ntory and Update Reports (f\UIR); . 2007 [,"vel of Service \:'Iorkshop nlat,-,ri-lls: . Minutes ot 2U07, 2U08, and 200~) PLlnning Commission/Productivity Committee Joint meeting'" . Board of COlJilt'j Commissioner meetin[',s regarding AUIR; . 2009 PMks and P,~creati(Jn Impact Fee Study (completed by TOA); . Growth r,'1and~;<'n1('nt Plan, r,ccreation dnd Open Space Element; . Other pertl1z,nent pJrk planning dOCUllll"nts, l5 appropriJte; and . Other County';}i"!,,, Planlling Efforts: [rist of C)~,1 Horiwn Study; IntPr,"ctivp C;ro'Nth IVlodE'l; ImillokC1\ee I\I-P" ~vla'>ter f)lan; RUI-al LclncL; S:p'l'/arclship f'rogram and proposed developments; and Other pert!IiPllt Infrilstr"ucture plrins. The plans clnd dOUIIl\t?llt<, rl""Ji?W "'/ill be summarized and documented, and the implicatioll~ for th, Parks--;r,d Recleation i'.1.F,ter" Plan '.vill be identified. Task 1,4 - Staff Review ivl.oeting ((onf~r[:.n~c.c::}ln One conference call11leet[llg ',vith County q;lff is included to review the ongoing analysis. It is Jnticipated that this confprencp call '/iill occur during the development of the Needs !\sses'Oment (Task 3), Task 2 - Evaluation of Existing Inventories The Consultant '!!ill dc,,/,'Iup ,1 comprehensiljl~ iil'Jentory of the County's existing parks and recreation facilities rh;lt ',,; ill Include the following: . Park typl~ 3nd PU!Pl)S,~, . Park lucatic)!' (.::ddiCS~ Jild district); . f-\crt:~~ge: . I n'/('f't(Jj"'./ c.of L~cili~i~'~(", ,~nd Jrneniti2~,; . f\ss('''-)sn;~~:llr of I UlI! (j i:i u n s ,Hid fun cbw a lit 'I: Ti lid" 1c,l)I!" f' r- Pc, ;~: 'OI~.(.,' k' ~,la'l 2010 Collier Countv p.::..rk',~ ;:----:d P,E:'cr'2;?,'(icn ~,..l(ister P\(in \ ( ) '-. 16 I ~ B 13 . 1\'/ailJlJle progrdil1s and e';enb, dlid . [I,laps illustrating tre locatiol; clncl celeh tVPiC- of palk lcount'jl:vide clnd by district). It is anticipated that the ConsulLclilt ':iill use thl: 2009 Park" Ilnp,:,ct Fee Update Study and 20()9 ALJIH as the basi' inventor\" f-\ny cI1Jrlgl'c, tc tip parks and/or facility inventory included in the impClct fee study alld 2009 Parks AUIR Irl'-.'CIHOI''1 will be identified, and the inventorv will be adjusted accordingly, based on dls(ussions \'/ith County staff. Inclusion of additional parks and faCilities '/ii!1 be' discussed during the project kickoff meeting. Pilrks ilnd reu('ation faciiities to 1.1" inc'uded ,hilt ,}}pre not included in the impact fee ill'Jentor'1 include: parks not owned ]nd/cr operated by Collier (ounty (e,g., federal and state park land, nlunicipcJi p~lIks, schocl sites '.'Jitll interlocal agreements for reueational use, etc.), and otr,er pdlkc, :is appropriate The evaluation of existing in'Jentories \vIII be. clccuiIlentecl in the Parks emu Recreation Master Plan, Task 3 - Needs Assessment i\ Needs Assessment will !J>.. cumplcli.'d to icii'ntifv th~ cJSSf'ts and constraints of the existing system, identify standards for tutur.:' dC'H!lopment, and assess the current and future needs and priorities of the COlJlW/', palKs ,;ncllTueation system. The results of this task wLlI be dOCL:rnented in the Parks and ~eueatl(in ~i13ster Plan. Task 3.1 -Demographic and MarketS!~t',l1lent/\n,JI'jsi~ An anJlysis of existing 2nd pmjcctcd populdtion, as ,--';eil ciS other socioeconomic '/Jriables, will be cundulled to d(~\jclop ~I mdrkc.:,t s,~gmi"nt an,;Iysis and the associated demand for parks and reueation hCllitic'). Sinc,' Census 2000 data is rather outdated, the demographic anal'jsis wil! be dC\icloPl'd using the rnost rec.ent data available, which Illay inciude sources such as pupuiation projenic.ns de'Jeloped by tI~e County's Comprehensive Planning Department, ESR!, local sc:ciC!ecor,omic data, and other demographic data developed for the r'ilastel' ['.,lobilit,,! Plan effort, as appropriate, Task 3,) - Facility Plannil1S' dnd Qi.'"ign An,-jj:,i.':: The facility planning ami deSIGn analvs!s ','iil! Include the follo'Aing components. . ParK Land ,"'.nal'/sis ,,,,-n dlnlysis uf [he existing Jnd projected park land needs will be determined based on standJrds idf2ntified in the Growth Management Plan, as well as a l"e\)I('\'1 elf :he f\Jalional Recreation aile! Park ,1'1ssociation (NRPA) acreage guidelines, . Park Facilit'{ i\nalysis . i\1l e,nal'/sis of the e,istii1g and projected park facility needs will be deterrl1lnee! bas('d on tf~e non-regulator,! standards identified in the ;\U I R, as ',vpll" s a rC"/i r:w uf tho :"IHP."'- f.l,-il i ti guidiC'li nes, ~,ld'( 20 to .-" Collier COLinty j'or'sl--.d Recre:1tion IV1Jstu Pl;ln Tnddlc-(Ji:'Ju ;:~. ,'I,S5::(",,,,:,, Ine. 16 11 913 . Park LOC,1tioil l\ilalysis - ;\1, ;JIl;1Iysic; oj ttl(~ park locations rolativE: to the existing and proposed population distributicJlI a;id proposed development vlill be reviewed dm! dnai'(icd to idd\tif'f locations ulldHSCl'ved by parks, parks locations relati\jl' to plJII!1ed develupnlent, ote. . Existing Park Conditions ;\sscssmcrn. - rho physical conditions and functionality of the parks determined durlllg tl1f3 IIi'iC'ntol'l process will be assessed to identify any e;,isting rnalntelLWCt.' ISSUt?S 01 uth,>r dl~ficiencies, . Future P;:nk Land Opportunitie'" l\nal'/sl'" - Opportunities for future park land purchasps "'Jill be identifipd based on an e\Jaluation of pnvironmentallands, vacant lands, publically owned land", etc. Thi~, analvsis \,/ill help to identify land potentially available for future park acquisition, Task 3.3 - Land Use and Policy Plannlll~ /-\nalvsis /-\pplicable polici(~s and lami use I'ec,ulatiolis re:;~~lding parks and recreation will be documented, iIlCludil1~; . Growth i\/l<ln<"gement Plan f-)olleies; . Land Development Regulations; . Coordination bellNeen Recleation PI'oviders; and . Implications I'('sulting from the reVl2','j of plans and documents, including countywide planning efforts, compll't"rj under TC1sk 1. will be evaluated and considered as part of thi" I')I'CII<; ,!1,',sc'ssmcnt. It should be noted t1F1\ the ]11,11'/':15 completed for Task 3 "'0':11 consider all parks included in the inventor'! c\/clluation cOll1qleted ul1Ci;or T,iS!;; 2. ,u.ny park land and/or facilities that are not o\Nned and/cr operJtuJ by Collier Count'l (e,g.. fecier'al and stclte park land, etc.) will also be identified and inccrpor;l\E'd into the dnalysis. Task 4 -Master Plan Development Task 4,1 Recommendcd Lpvel of Servicp StandJrds and ImrlEonlPntation Guidelllles The parks and reUI:',itlon svstun of Cullier County should reflect the needs of the residents Jnd visitors by settlllg standards fur appropriate st'rvice. The standards represent an expression of the essential facilities needed to provicJe the level of park and recreation services that are both desil';'cJ b'! the residents and necessary to support the County's seasonal visitor populClticili, Based Oil the results of the ~'I":t'ds i\SS2"lr'~ij: CCiITlpli':-:er.J I: the previolls Task, recommended standards \'!i\l be c!e'.'elo!:cc! kr the folloviing cCltcgori.c>s: Tindale-Oli'ie' ~< ,:'..SSOli,,'_<::~. i', ~/la'{ 2010 (ollic:1 CC'.:!1t'{ t. :1; .'_ ') J r ci F, t~ C ~ t:' ;; ti C i i r'.l, i '~ t ,=' r Pi ,3 n \ ~... 16 11 B~13 .l . r d rk Id rid S tJ nd::! rei s b,/ t'/ Pl~) \~:, f pJ . Park hclit'l stdrldcllcls b'i t',IJ>.' ur pyk, "I:d . Pa rk design sta IlcL'1 rds b'l l'iP'" 0; ;:Li" PopulJtiun ~('r veel Land to population !dtic Target sr'r\i!ce area Target Pd rk ')iZf~ (de i-e;_:t~~"J TVpe and number ui rl:UC' 'li,;!l,'1 f,K!I.I!e:' In addition, irnplemccntatinn ,~Ui(le'IIl"'s 'JlIli : PCC"""-I~t"'-I,'1.1,IOI1S '.'-}',II be pro'/idecl that identify specific standJrc!s tu 'nclur.1':' i'l PO!,C'I clL:CUI1V::lllS, sL:cll as Capital Improvement Element and Growth i\;landGenl2nl ['ian, '-"::1 SU', SUr',dCiI'ds that should be monitored internallv, The le'lel 01 S"IVIC(' stdndcllcis dI1di'iSiC, ':,Iil i:l' shO':lr' for parks that are both owned and not o',.vlwd by the' CUUIll,/. Task '-;.2 - Cost E stim" te', TOJ S to.},!0il_UL Using the unit costs in tiw 2009 Pdrks dl:':! 1;"U0'ltlr'il !"~p(1C'- Fee Update Studv, order of magnitudE' cost estinnk', TCi! 11W\,till/, th,' c',i',t n,~,'i,:d 1clruu=' !.lncl and facility needs for th e pa rks J n d r e erea I io 11 S I ,jilcLHC):, ,-'.- ill be.: ;: ,-' '- C Ie' r~l'Cl Task 4,3 - Master' Plan Dl',,('lupr1wn~ The Parks ,md Heupatioll r,,1.JSl,:,r rlll1 ";:ill Inl_lud,' t':,.:l phiIS"'). the fi!'st phase is a short- term rlldstEr plan for tll", nt':<t ten ',".-'ars Tht: ".el'i'll ph"",' I', d burld,out Master Plan that is able to be incorpolat.-"cIlilto tiJ,' Co iill' COU!lT'fl,,1.:;stt'r ~.1obillty Plan, \'/hich will be de':eloped concurr'entl'/ '.vith th' PH~S ,-,,'d F'~r__(f:__,;tll)n r\laster Plan The results of this pJojL'ct '.'Iii! Ll.' u.lnTr::licd 111".:::1 c,';C~Vje :'.lascer Plan document. The i\iaster Plan wiil identify t'll f;lcillti,::" !'cec,.-d t:..' ~,cr"'~ ~'rc':,tn C'icr the ten-year and build-out planning hor'izons, ;,1:, \'jell CiS the '(L~'lt:fiutioi"1 of D'-c;et locations for new parks, Collier County Tir,dalc-QL'/f ?... ~\s.:;('(~! l~t-..; P-:":,'_ ;~I-(~ P.cC:--C;..:tiOfl ~"lasLer P1.=H1 i\lJI :::C 10 c, \.. .-. , . ! Y la '\ ). OJ 16 11 B 13 Collier County Parks and Recreation Master Plan Scope of Optional Services (Revised) Collier County is in the process of conducting a Parks and Recreation Master Plan to optimize the County's existing parks and recreation resources and assets and identify future parks and recreation needs. The County recognizes that public input is essential to the Master Plan process and has requested Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) prepare this Scope of Optional Services for the County's consideration. Optional Service Task 1: Parks and Recreation Master Plan Consensus-Building Workshop The Master Plan will include a preliminary needs assessment to identify the assets and constraints of the existing system, identify standards for future development, and assess the current and future needs and priorities of the County's parks and recreation system. As part of this Task, TOA will prepare for, facilitate, and document one Consensus Building Workshop (CBW) to gather input from participants relating to the preliminary needs identified for the Master Plan. Task 1.1 - Prepare for Consensus-Building Workshop TOA will provide the County with a sample letter inviting individuals to participate in the CBW. The County will be responsible for developing a list of attendees, inviting participants to partake in the CBW, and confirming attendee's participation. It is anticipated that members of the County's Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, key county staff, representatives from the municipal parks departments, and others, as appropriate, will be invited to participate in the CBW. The County shall also be responsible for selecting and reserving an optimal location to hold the CBW that can comfortably accommodate five- break out group locations. TOA will be responsible for organizing and preparing all materials needed for the CBW, with the exception of providing lunch and other refreshments, which shall be the responsibility of the County. TOA's responsibilities include preparing a set of materials for each break-out group to guide the discussion and desired input concerning standards, future needs, and priorities of the County's Parks and Recreation system. Materials provided will include maps and other graphics to illustrate the existing parks assets, demographic analyses, and preliminary parks needs. The number of break-out groups will be determined based on the number of individuals confirmed to participate, but it is anticipated that there will approximately 30 participants total with six participants in each break-out group. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. July 21, 2010 1 Collier County Parks and Recreation Master Plan - Optional Services 1611813 Task 1.2 - Conduct Consensus-Building Workshop TOA will conduct the CBW, which is anticipated to be four hours to six hours in length, including lunch. The CBW will begin with an opening presentation explaining the purpose and procedures of the CBW. Participants will be divided into break-out groups, with each group including representation from various organizations, groups, and interests. Each break-out group will assign a facilitator, timekeeper, and note taker to help facilitate the process and document the break-out group's discussion. TOA will provide a list of specific topics and tasks to guide the break-out group's discussion. In addition, three TOA staff familiar with the consensus-building process, including two TOA Principals and the Master Plan Project Manager, will be available throughout the CBW to facilitate the meeting and assist the break-out groups. It is anticipated that a minimum of two members of the County Parks and Recreation Department also will need to assist in the break-out group discussion and be available for questions. Following completion ofthe break-out group discussions, the participants will reconvene in a large group to present their break-out groups recommendations on each topic. Task 1.3 - Summarize Consensus-Building Workshop Input and Recommendations Following completion ofthe CBW, TOA will summarize the discussion points and recommendations made by break-out each group and identify implications and potential changes for the Master Plan. The Master Plan will include documentation of the CBW process and provide a detailed summary of the discussions and changes incorporated into the Master Plan resulting from the CBW. Task 2: Planning Commission/BOCC Meetings TOA is available to present the Master Plan to the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). These meetings include development of a PowerPoint presentation, meeting attendance, and a summary of the feedback and comments received during each meeting. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. July 21, 2010 2 Collier County Parks and Recreation Master Plan - Optional Services Veterans Community Park and Pelican Bay Community Park 16 J. 1 B 13 Park Programs Veterans Park seems to be a very busy place offering a variety of recreational opportunities. When I visited the community center it was bustling with summer camp children. Ms. Jeanine McPherson- Hogle, Parks Supervisor, indicated that summer camp enrollment was higher this year than last. Veterans Park had over 165 elementary-age children participating in the Camp Collier full-day program during each of the nine weeks. A similar camp for middle school-age children, held at North Naples Middle School, had 40 participants per week. The Veterans Park staff also ran 41 weekly specialty camps including: Brain Builders Preschool Camps, Culinary Camp, Hockey Camp, Inline Skate Camp, Jr Artist Camp, Little Gator Preschool Camps, Math Camp Levell, Math Camp Level 2, Performance and Visual Arts Camps, Preschool Sports Camps, Science Camp, Spanish Theater Camps, Soccer Camps, Tennis Camps, Writing Levell Camp, Writing Level 2 Camp, Young Artist Camp, and Youth Hoops Camps. The Community Center also had several ongoing instructional programs in the evenings: Jazzercize, Karate, Hip Hop Dance, Irish Set Dance, Tiny Dancers, Performance Dance, and, Yogagenics. Pelican Bay Community Park offers 4 tennis mixers per week in the early morning. In the late morning and afternoon, the Junior Tennis Program is in full swing. This program is designed for the intermediate to advanced level tournament-level players. Pelican Bay boasts several junior program participants with state and national rankings. Park Grounds and Outdoor Amenities The grounds and athletic areas appear to be well maintained. I spoke with Mr. AI Arcia, Veterans Park Maintenance Crew Leader and Mr. Osmin Conde, Pelican Bay Community Park Crew Leader. Both of these staff members appear to take great pride in their respective parks and it shows. Recent or Ongoing Projects Veterans Park Soccer Field has recently re-opened after a period of resting and repairs. Veterans Park Rover Run Dog Park has recently been re-sodded in areas. The grass is growing in nicely. Veterans Park Baseball infield is under repairs. Clay is being re-Ieveled and clay conditioner added. Pelican Bay Tennis Courts have been scarified around perimeter to manage the algae growth associated high rainfall. Major Projects Veterans Park improvements planned for sidewalk to athletic fields and other spots where the paving has begun to erode. This project should begin in the fall. Pelican Bay Tennis Courts are undergoing significant renovation. The court lighting system is being completely replaced. The project is scheduled to start in September 2010. Park Needs According to staff, the greatest needs at Veterans Park include replacement of maintenance equipment, outdoor furniture/bleachers/trash receptacles, and additional office space and storage through building expansion. Parking is the primary need at Pelican Bay Community Park. Cost estimate for equipment is $60,000 and includes Infield Grooming Machine ($15,000), Mowers 72" Deck (2 @ $9000), Tractor ($25,000). Cost estimate for outdoor furniture and bleachers is $28,000 and includes concrete benches ($750 @ 6), Concrete Picnic Tables ($1000 @ 4) Bleachers ($4000 @ 4), large concrete trash receptacles ($800 @ 4). At this time park staff cannot estimate the costs of building and parking expansions. . , ~ PARAB Report 16 11 843 Vineyards Community Park Wish List: Benches in park need replacing Signs in park need replacing Shade structure over concession eating area New bleachers at softball fields Shade structure over playground New pre-school furniture and equipment for VPK program starting in fall of 2011 Storage shelves built in closets Cabinet with lock built on wall to house the tv for afterschool and preschool use as well as other child care programs. New stereo/PA system with roll down screen for program and rental use in large room Trash cans with county logo need replacing Storage area at maintenance shed to store sand in to keep out of public eye Electrical outlet installed at Pavilion #1 Dimmer lights installed in rooms Pave area by tennis courts to create permanent parking spots 16 11 B 13 We just finished up a very successful summer camp program. We had approximately 130 elementary age kids and 40 middle school age kids. We kept them busy with themed activities, field trips, crafts, guest speakers, and water days. We are now gearing up for the start of our fall programs. We are offering a variety of programs this fall. Our usual dance, karate, sports, etc. And some new programs such as gardening classes, art classes, digital photography, home improvement workshops and of course our annual Family Halloween Ball. Our fields got a nice rest this summer and are looking green for the start of soccer and lacrosse season. Which begin at the end of September. The maintenance crew are about to start some landscaping projects as well as an improvement project for pavilion #2. Our interactive water area is going to be redone in the winter, which will increase park use and we will see a rise in our already increasing pavilion and room rentals for birthday parties. , EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 J 1 B 13 Consideration to Redirect Beach Park Facility Funds as outlined below. OBJECTIVE: The BCC has requested that the P&RAB and CAC review, discuss and make a recommendation as to whether: 1. The Beach Park Facility - TDC Fund 183 should be used to provide $1,000,000 from the Beach Park Facility fund to the Tourism Department for emergency advertizing. 2. Whether the Beach Park Facility Fund 183 and the Museum TDC fund should be permanently reallocated to provide for annual destination marketing. It is anticipated that an additional $2,000,000 is required for annual destination marketing. 3. If funds are recommended to be reallocated, what reallocation should be considered from each of these funds? CONSIDERATIONS: The P&RAB and CAC are committed to tourism as a vital industry within Collier County. It is also supportive of identifying and securing the necessary funding to provide an effective tourism marketing program. The P&RAB and CAC also recognizes that our beaches and the visitor "beach" experience is the single most important tourist draw to Collier County. Keeping our beaches and the beach experience our visitors enjoy healthy and attractive to tourists should be the single most important objective of the TDC, P&RAB and the CAC advisory committees. Beach park facilities are critical to the successful beach experience and memory our visitors take away from Collier County. To have a successful beach experience; 1. The beaches must be clean, attractive and environmentally healthy with adequate parking access. 2. An attractive beach park facility must exist that provides water; clean, well maintained and attractive bathrooms; a concession and the ability to provide for personnel protection from lighting, storm and sun. 3. With these facilities/amenities, visitors generally do not spread out more that 100 yards on either side of a facility. 4. These facilities are critical to inland hoteliers and visitors that do not have direct access to the beach. Beach Park Facilities, Fund 183 receives approximately $2,000,000 per year to construct, refurbish and perform major maintenance activities for beach park facilities throughout the County. Funds normally accumulate in reserve until sufficient funds are available to complete a significant project. Approximately $4,000,000 is currently in reserves to fund major bathroom refurbishments and parking enhancements in the future. A copy of the five year capital program for beach park facilities is attached. , 16 J 1 813 ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Coastal Advisory Committee should consider the following issues: 1. The P&RAB and CAC support a onetime re-allocation of $1,000,000 from the Beach Park Facilities Fund 183 to tourism to support the emergency marketing effort. 2. That the P&RAB and CAC not support any reallocation of funds that would have a detrimental effect on any existing county program or operation. 3. That the P&RAB and CAC not support any permanent reallocation of TDC funds from the existing 4% allocation. 4. That the P&RAB and ~ support a comprehensive long term program that provides for sufficient funding to perform year round marketing of this destination that is consistent with other destinations that we are competing against. FISCAL IMPACT: The Source of funds is from Category "A" Tourist Development Tax fund 183. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has not been reviewed or approved by the County Attorney's Office. RECOMMENDATION: The following are offered for consideration: 1. The P&RAB and CAC support a onetime re-allocation of $1,000,000 from the Beach Park Facilities Fund 183 to tourism to support the emergency marketing effort. 2. That the P&RAB and CAC not support any reallocation of funds that would have a detrimental effect on any existing county program or operation. 3. That the P&RAB and CAC not support any permanent reallocation of TDC funds from the existing 4% allocation. 4. That the P&RAB and CAC support a comprehensive long term program that provides for sufficient funding to perform year round marketing of this destination that is consistent with other destinations that we are competing against. PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin 16 I 1 8 ~u~st 18,2010 It was noted the CAC has already approved the plan and the Museum Advisory Board approved a similar plan. b. Review of TDe Fund 183 Beach Park Facilities Jack Wert gave a slide presentation on the Tourism Promotional Assistance. He reported year-round tourism marketing and promotion is essential to attract new and repeat visitors. He stated visitors spend in Collier County and contribute to all tourist development tax uses. FY 2010 tourism invested an additional $lM transferred from Beach Re-Nourishment Reserves with a return on the investment of $20.65 in new visitor spending during the first 6 months on each dollar invested. The following items were presented: ~ Beach Park Facilities Proposal ~ How We Would Invest the Reallocated %1.0 Million ~ Return On Investment Report 2010 Campaigns ~ Park Facilities Benefits ~ The Next Steps Discussion ensued on the Advisory Boards concerns on redirecting funds and many questions were addressed by the Staff. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Coastal Advisory Committee support a onetime re-allocation of $1,000,000 from the Beach Park Facilities Fund 183 to tourism to support the emergency marketing effort. Second by David Saletko. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Coastal Advisory Committee not support any reallocation offunds that would have a detrimental effect on any existing County program or operation. Second by Phil Brougham. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Coastal Advisory Committee not support any permanent reallocation of Tourism Development Council from the existing allocation. Second by David Saletko. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Coastal Advisory Committee support of a comprehensive long term program through the adoption of one additional penny, bringing the total to 5 cents, the maximum allowed, of TDC Funds for destination marketing. Second by David Saletko. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. 4 f:81 pun:l ~t pI. \ 9l 0, j /". f ~. J. .(".... , I \. I J t ' . : , . ~ '. . ....... 16 1 I 1 B 1 3 s��o�zolo -1„ 101 cl _ tilscussion Parks& Recreation Advisory Board August 18, 2010 Situation Analysis O Year-round tourism marketing and promotion is essential to attract new and repeat visitors O Visitors, in turn, spend in Collier businesses and contribute to all tourist development tax uses. O In FY 10, tourism invested an additional $1 million transferred from Beach Renourishment Reserves • The return on investment= $20.65 in new visitor spending first 6 months for each dollar invested • TDC explored several alternatives in July to support continued year-round destination marketing 1 , B ~3 16 I 1 8/10/2010 v' " r' I ! . .f '... ! . ---"_.-->~---- '~._-.._...,,---,.,---- "'-- -'~.~-~':~~;i~:lr!;l~::';~:~l;~~~'\':_~;:~ ~. TDC Discussion Topics · Allocate a portion of the Beach and Inlet Management funds (Fund 195) for marketing purposes. - If pending FEMA reimbursements are received, these reserve funds should be sufficient to handle future renourishments · Reduce or eliminate the amount allocated to non-county owned or operated museum grants · Reduce the amount allocated to County Museum Operations in Category C -1 for operating expenses · stipulate an increased amount of the remaining funds be allocated to marketing of the museums. · Recommend an increase in the tourist development tax to 5% for year-round destination marketing · Allocate a ,portion of tourist tax funds allocated to Beach Park Facilities (Fund 183) for one year · Policy directs a $2 million allocation per year to these purposes · Current balance is over $4 million for future projects ''':'~'t. _ '..' ~...'.'8r= ~- l' ..~.. - - ~~ Mandatory Allocations (10/25/05) . ' ~ · 3. Mandatory annual budget allocation offunds and maintenance of reserves. · a. Catastrophe reserves shall be accumulated in the budget with $1 M in 2004 plus $0.5 M per ear thereafter (up to a maximum of $10 M). In the event of a catastrophe requiring the expenditure of all or part of these reserves, $0.5 M will continue to be set aside. · b. Major renourishment reserves shall be accumulated in the budget with $2 M per year after the completion of the major renourishment project currently in planning and permitting (as of November 2003; projected to start setting aside funds in FY 2006). · c. Beach park facilities (including beach access property acquisition) shall be funded at an average of $2 M per year. This funding allocation shall be adjusted annually in an amount equal to one-third of the TDC Category 'W' revenues. · d. Remaining funds may be used for eligible grant applications as outlined in the policy below. 2 ,--\ ~ \.../ : 16 \ 1 "/10/2010 8 13 ~C--~~~~:. Beach Park Facilities Option . One year investment of $1.0 million for destination marketing enhancement . Based on 2010 investment from Beach Renourishment Reserves, ROI will return about 1/3 to ~ of those funds . Additional promotion dollars will assist . Enhanced first and second quarter advertising . Enhanced spring and summer advertising . Enhanced sports promotion efforts to support inland and beach park facilities -- ~-ts~,,-,.;;;,:;-7j__;,~~~~~;~~!~,. Uses of Reallocated $1.0 Million · Enhanced Winter, Spring and Summer Advertising and Promotional campaign $825,000 · Visitor Center Coordinator Position: $50,000 · Additional FAM's/Sponsorships: $25,000 · Enhanced PR efforts: $25,000 · Web site enhancements: $50,000 · Enhanced research: $25,000 3 B38/10/2010 f. Winter Northern U.S. Campaign Overview • Leisure traveler focused campaign • Markets: -New York/New Jersey, Chicago and Philadelphia - Some national internet exposure • Campaign Timing: January 17th-March 14th 2010 • Media: Spot and cable television, online, e-mail, print Winter Northern U.S. Campaign Television 4 16 6 8/10/2010 • X13 Winter Northern U.S. Campaign Print Come play in our winter wonderland. r •�� ._,. Come discover new wintertime fun and a Florida destination you'll really wane up to. From pristine beaches that stretch for more than 30 miles to the vast untouched beauty Naples of the Everglades,this is truly Florida's LaastParadise. Marco Island gVeze ttplan your trip now and also enjoy Everglades Florida's best getaway deals,all online at ParadiseCoast.comld als.i 1-800-2-escape Winter Northern U.S. Campaign Key Performance Indicators 1st Quarter Key Performance Indicators 2009 010 Difference %Change ParadiseCoast.com Web Visits 99,095 122,699 23,604 +23.80/o Visitor Guide Requests 12,153 20,943 8,790 +72.3% Book Hotel Via Web Site 3,328 4,430 1,102 +33.1% Room Nights 632,430 672,660 40,230 +6.4% Visitors 470,700 495,300 24,600 +5.2% Tourist Tax Collections* $5,632,445 $6,117,495 $485,050 +8.6% "Tax collections reported in February-April 2009/2000(representing 1st Quarter) Source:Miles Media Group,Phase V of Southwest Florida,Research Data Services &Collier County Tax Collector 5 B 13 1 6 I 1 3,10,2010 Advertising Target Market ROI Winter Campaign Total Visitor Winter ROI Per Markets Expenditures Campaign Promotional Investment Dollar Invested New York/New Jersey $9,661,077 $409,180 $23.61 Chicago $6,571,765 $281,725 $23.33 Philadelphia $3,772,685 $267,683 $14.09 Direct Visitor Expenditures $20,005,527 $958,593 $20.87 Economic Impact(Direct and $29,828,241 $958,593 $31.12 Indirect) Source:Research Data Services Inc.&Implan (•S Naples MareoIsland V r:Yer6latles • in-state Summer Campaign Message ° ParadiseCoast.com/Summer - Digital Summer Fun Guide '^ 11111111111451r3 - Days of Summer Event :. �, and countdown tear Loam and Summer Sa`iegs - Paradise Promise link - Area offers A Clear Ccast - Customized Twitter page AK to r°..ew� c°ua wx.c.m,i rarr r.py.niJ■yn Flee<XC In m eft b Fn-y■rw°vgparaeaea„mrm,� ai 6 16 1 1 B l 3 8,10,2010 Naples MarcoIsland Everglades .---= In-state "No Oil" • Recently adjusted to reflect oil-free Paradise Promise message,while still conveying summer value -TV spot-"...still clear and NOAA forecasters say it will stay that way." Less than 1%chance of getting° National Oceanic and Atmo(sp�hheenc Administration Naples V Marco Island Everglades www.ParadiseCoast.comIPromise —° 1-800-2-escape Ev Naerglples ade'Ms arcoIsland 'w In-state Summer Campaign Message 7 16 11813 8,10,20,0 1 4, a/ Naples Marco Island Everglades- In-state Spring/Summer C i- paig ni • Area Visitation from Florida consistently higher ove 2009,since campaign launch. 60000- 55000 50000 —2009 45000 —2010 40000 35000 1 30000 APRIL MAY JUNE Source:Research Data Services Inc. Naples Marco Island VW Everglades-'.-^v- Escape Right Here Campaign Message 1 Result-ParadiseCoast.com/Discover Mart" tatCBt:land +- S • "Which Getaway are E I -- ~w_ you?"itineraries • Days of Summer Event r,the khe With these deals and adventures, Calendar and Countdown •our summer vacations right here. ® • Area specials Ea tat �] ,f, lg.. -- A -.,.•.5 1 Entera;nme-t C nng j Shepping,Spes I EventS IWrrylSnwcr oMt b: 410 off Bast A aOaW.Rata at Inn of Naples , :ID :eJ :IS Itsillettm Ca.z X.a. Nrs S,n. i _.yrtnm Super Summer Getaway at the ion of Napka - fr 8 B13 . 16 I 1 8/10/2010 Naples MarcoIsland Everglades- i Escape Right Here Campaign Results to-date • Visitation to ParadiseCoast.com from the Ft. Myers/Naples DMA increased 23%over 2009 (June 1st to August 9th) • "Escape Right Here"special deals Page • "Book Now"button was the third highest click thru Source:Miles Media Group IIMMMIMW geni Naples Aiartolsland Evcrglades-^..^v ROI Report 2010 Campaigns IZey Performance Indicators Jan. - June Results of $1 Million Investment in Marketing: • Total visitation increased 5%over 2009 • Florida visitation up 8.5% • Additional 37,10o visitors to destination • Additional$18.5 million in direct expenditures • Occupancy up 8.3%,per latest Smith Travel Research Report • Tourist tax revenue increased$623,621(Jan-Jun'10 Collections) • ROI of$20.65 for each dollar invested in destination marketing 9 .. ~ (i .'- 16 11 B 1910/2010 ~-~~:. '~2.:::.;~~'~:$:r: ,,~-~_ ___---_ Faci I iti es--'Be ne--~I~'~~<-' . North Collier Regional Park . Soccer, lacrosse, softball . Basketball, other indoor events . Fun 'n Sun Lagoon customers . Vanderbilt Beach Park . EVPVoIleyball . Skimboard Championships . Park Facilities Revenue from Sports Council Events . Field usage fees revenue from . IT 09 54,500 . IT 10 thru June 56,500 . $19,400 total for past three year . Hotel Rebate Contributions - Park Share 60% . IT 09 512>531 . IT 10 tnru June $11,235 . 539>387 total for past three years . Concession Revenues from above events IT 09 $51,000 . IT 10 thru June $33>500 The Next Steps . PARAB discussion and recommendations . Recommendation to BCC in September . Public Hearings on Revised Ordinance or Policy . Additional Funds Approved by November 1 10 16 , 11\ l(;i "'~~.-....~~. 'C:~~b.::,'.;,~~::::;;~~,;'1;--:'~~~~ . ~(..""," Questions & Discussion 8/10/2010 11 .. '1 i () ; \ i '. I j J ~, 16 '10 ~ 8/10/2010 5th Percent of Tourist Tax . Permanent funding solution to year-round marketing & promotion . Generates funds for additional advertising, PR, internet marketing . Additional funds for sports marketing . Additional funds for arts and culture promotion . Additional funds for marketing grants ..;:., , Our Tax Rates are Among Lowest u.s. cities where travelers incur the lowest total tax burden in general sales taxes and discriminatory travel taxes, are: . Fort Lauderdale, FL . Fort Myers/Naples, FL . Portland, OR . Detroit, MI . Honolulu, HI The cities that impose the highest total taxes on travelers are: . Chicago, IL . New York, NY . Boston, MA . Seattle, WA . Minneapolis, MN Source: National Business Travel Assoc (NBTA )Foundation, 2010 12 16 '1 1 8 1J3 ':~~'j.".';!;;"'i.(:~ft~:r;~;.;::,:,~'~r:~~~'^:i=-' .~---_. - ' '~~~..c~t~~:~ ; Documents for Reference . Florida State Statute 125.0104 . County Ordinance 92-60 as amended o Beach and Beach Park Facilities Policy (10/25/2005) 1. To acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, or promote one or more publicly owned and operated convention centers, sports stadiums, sports arenas, coliseums, or auditoriums, or museums that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public, within the boundaries of the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied. Tax revenues received pursuant to this section may also be used for promotion of zoological parks that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public. However, these purposes may be implemented through service contracts and leases with lessees with sufficient expertise or financial capability to operate such facilities; 2. To promote and advertise tourism in the State of Florida and nationally and internationally; however, if tax revenues are expended for an activity, service, venue, or event, the activity, service, venue, or event shall have as one of its main purposes the attraction of tourists as evidenced by the promotion of the activity, service, venue, or event to tourists; 8/10/2010 13 ,.- ,\. I \., ~. ( . t .. . \ (, 16 \ 1 B 1-,/10/2010 3. To fund convention bureaus, tourist bureaus, tourist information centers, and news bureaus as county agencies or by contract with the chambers of commerce or similar associations in the county, which may include any indirect administrative costs for services performed by the county on behalf of the promotion agency; or 4. To finance beach park facilities or beach improvement, maintenance, renourishment, restoration, and erosion control, including shoreline protection, enhancement, cleanup, 01' restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access as those uses relate to the physical preservation of the beach, shoreline, or inland lake or river. However, any funds identified by a county as the local matching source for beach renourishment, restoration, 01' erosion control projects included in the long- range budget plan of the state's Beach Management Plan, pursuant to s. , or funds contractually obligated by a county in the financial plan for a federally authorized shore protection project may not be used or loaned for any other purpose. -~ ~~. ,,' ;~~:;~#.}.;,: :~~{< . :~j.~; ,US _~:":~~ ',:~i~: ~.. ~j,-6;;"--' 1. Pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility, or the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a retained spring training franchise facility, either publicly owned and operated, or publicly owned and operated by the owner of a professional sports franchise or other lessee with sufficient expertise or financial capability to operate such facility, and to pay the planning and design costs incurred prior to the issuance of such bonds. 2. Pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a convention center, and to pay the planning and design costs incurred prior to the issuance of such bonds. 3. Pay the operation and maintenance costs of a convention center for a period of up to 10 years. Only counties that have elected to levy the tax for the purposes authorized in subparagraph 2. may use the tax for the purposes enumerated in this subparagraph. Any county that elects to levy the tax for the purposes authorized in subparagraph 2. after July 1, 2000, may use the proceeds of the tax to pay the operation and maintenance costs of a convention center for the life of the bonds. 4. Promote and advertise tourism in the State of Florida and nationally and internationally; however, if tax revenues are expended for an activity, service, venue, or event, the activity, service, venue, or event shall have as one of its main purposes the attraction of tourists as evidenced by the promotion of the activity, service, venue, or event to tourists. 14 16 11 8'13 2010 Project , ; / " S" 1~' ~.,. () ; . ........ '... , .."'~ 16110'\3 PI.y, CDIIJUCI i1' D i.tNlf.'" [ustorner Survey May,20tO 16 \.~ B 13 Please give us your input 1. Do you perceive Collier County Parks and Recreation as a major contributor to your community's quality of life? Response Response Percent Count Yes 93.4% 225 No IiiiI 6.6% 16 Why or Why not? 88 answered question 241 skipped question 2 2. Are you aware of the many classes/programs/activities and services that Collier County Parks and Recreation has to offer? Response Response Percent Count Yes 80.0% 172 No . . 20.0% 43 answered question 215 skipped question 28 1 of 7 .- .. . . 0 ." 1 l~ . '- i OJ .. 16 I 1 H 13 3. How do you currently receive information regarding Collier County Parks and Recreation classes/programs/activities and services? (Choose all that apply) 4. How would you like to receive information regarding Collier County Parks and Recreation classes/programs/activities and services? (Choose only one answer) Response Response Percent Count Internet . . 25.5% 59 Email 50.2% 116 REAL. Guide . . 24.2% 56 Other (please specify) 14 answered question 231 skipped question 12 2 of 7 ,"1 "r 16 11 813 5. What classes/programs or activities have you or your family participated in the past year? (Choose all that apply) 3 of 7 ,- ;.. .... , i; , i 16 11 B 13 6. Please let us know which facilities you most use in our parks: (Check all that apply) 4 of 7 i ;'J ~ 16 i ~1 B 13 7. When people in your community speak of recreation or park programs/activities for youth, which community agency comes to mind first? (Choose only one answer) Response Response Percent Count Collier County Parks and 81.7% 187 Recreation City of Naples ii 3.1% 7 Boys and Girls Club i 1.7% 4 YMCA - 8.3% 19 Non-profit youth organizations (II 1.3% 3 Other (please specify) ii 3.9% 9 answered question 229 skipped question 14 8. Perceiving Collier County Parks and Recreation as a positive and influential role in the community is our goal. How would you personally perceive the Parks and Recreation Department? Response Response Percent Count Positive 97.8% 226 Negative i 2.2% 5 Please explain 29 answered question 231 skipped question 12 5 of 7 1 ! d i 16 I 1., .j "' , , \" ,. H ~ j 13 j '. ' ... 9. How would you rate Collier County Parks and Recreation in the following areas? Very Very Don't Rating Response Poor Average Good Poor Good Know Average Count 0.9% 1.3% 5.6% 26.3% 50.0% 15.9% 232 Program choices 4.47 (2) (3) (13) (61 ) (116) (37) 0.4% 2.2% 9.9% 26.7% 52.2% 8.6% 232 Customer Service 4.40 (1 ) (5) (23) (62) (121 ) (20) 0.8% 1.7% 5.5% 26.3% 47.5% 18.2% Beach access 4.44 236 (2) (4) (13) (62) (112) (43) 0.0% 0.0% 4.7% 33.2% 57.4% 4.7% Cleanliness of Parks 4.55 235 (0) (0) (11 ) (78) (135) (11 ) 0.4% 0.0% 5.1% 25.7% 54.4% 14.3% Cleanliness of Beaches 4.56 237 (1 ) (0) (12) (61 ) (129) (34) 0.0% 0.0% 6.8% 31.9% 48.1% 13.2% Cleanliness of Community Centers 4.48 235 (0) (0) (16) (75) (113) (31 ) 0.4% 1.3% 4.4% 17.9% 20.1% 55.9% Boat Ramp Access 4.27 229 (1 ) (3) (10) (41 ) (46) (128) 0.4% 1.7% 4.3% 13.5% 58.7% 21.3% 230 Aquatic Facilities 4.63 (1 ) (4) (10) (31 ) (135) (49) 0.4% 0.0% 4.8% 15.7% 30.9% 48.3% 230 Fitness Centers 4.48 (1 ) (0) (11 ) (36) (71 ) (111 ) Please provide feedback on any areas we need to improve 46 answered question 240 skipped question 3 10. Additional Comments Response Count 41 answered question 41 skipped question 202 6 of 7 16 It: 1 B 13 11. About you (optional) 7 of 7 ... . 161 1 B 13 8/17/2010 Gii>. Naples MarcoWand ~E~~ .....,...~,."' <:<0.....,.. Tourism Promotional Assistance Discussion Parks & Recreation Advisory Board August 18, 2010 o &;;; NopIes M4rt0Wand ~~~~- Situation Analysis · Year-round tourism marketing and promotion is essential to attract new and repeat visitors · Visitors, in turn, spend in Collier businesses and contribute to all tourist development tax uses. · In FY 10, tourism invested an additional $1 million transferred from Beach Renourishment Reserves - The return on investment = $20.65 in new visitor spending first 6 months for each dollar invested · TOC explored several alternatives in July to support continued year-round destination marketing and to continue the fight against the recession and oil spill · Presentations suggested to all stakeholder group 1 ~ ~ 16 \ :LB 1 }17/2010 &;;;; Naples Marrolsland ~E-Pdes~ .................'."' c; co.......,.. Toe Discussion Topics · Allocate a portion of tourist tax funds allocated to Beach Park Facilities (Fund 183) for one year - Policy directs a $2 million allocation per year to these purposes - Current balance is over $4 million for future projects · Allocate a portion of the Beach and Inlet Management Renourishment Reserve (Fund 195) for marketing purposes · Reduce or eliminate the amount allocated to non-county owned or operated museum grants · Reduce the amount allocated to County Museum Operations in Category C-l for operating expenses · Recommend an increase in the tourist development tax to 5% for year-round destination marketing &;;;; NapIcs Mateo I5WId ~~~~. Beach & Beach Park Facilities Mandatory Allocations (10/25/05) . 3, Mandatory annual budget allocation of funds and maintenance of reserves. . a. Catastrophe reserves shall be accumulated in the budget with $1 M in 2004 plus $0.5 M per ear thereafter (up to a maximum of $10 M). In the event of a catastrophe requiring the expenditure of all or part of these reserves, $0.5 M will continue to be set aside. . b. Major renourishment reserves shall be accumulated in the budget with $2 M per year after the completion of the major renourishment project currently in planning and permitting (as of November 2003; projected to start setting aside funds in FY 2006). · c. Beach park facilities (including beach access property acquisition) shall be funded at an average of $2 M per year. This funding allocation shall be adjusted annually in an amount equal to one-third of the TOC Category "A" revenues. · d. Remaining funds may be used for eligible grant applications as outlined in the policy below. 2 16 ,\ B 13 8/17/2010 Giii. Naples MarcoIslaftd ~ EYerJIIados~ ~...............,... ""'''''.....or. Beach Park Facilities Proposal · One year investment of $1.0 million for destination marketing · Based on 2010 investment from Beach Renourishment Reserves, ROI will return about 1/3 to % of those funds in FY 11 · Additional promotion dollars will assist - Enhanced first and second quarter advertising - Enhanced spring and summer advertising - Enhanced sports promotion efforts to support inland and beach park facilities - Invest in new Northern US markets ~ Naples MarcoIslaftd ~~~~~ How We Would Invest the Reallocated $1.0 Million · Enhanced Winter, Spring and Summer Advertising and Promotional campaign $825,000 · Visitor Center Coordinator Position Continued: $50,000 · Additional Familiarization Events & Sponsorships $25,000 · Expanded Public Relations efforts: $25,000 · Domestic & Inti. Web site enhancements: $50,000 · Expanded ROI research: $25,000 3 16 11 a 13 '^- NipIa MalwIs1and ~E~~ ................. eo....... ROI Report 2010 Campaigns Key Performance Indicators Jan. - June Results of $1 Million Investment in Marketing: · Total visitation increased 5% over 2009 · Florida visitation up 8.5% · Additional 31,100 visitors to destination · Additional $18.5 million in direct expenditures · Occupancy up 8.3%, per latest Smith Travel Research Report · Tourist tax revenue increased $623,621 (Jan-Jun' 10 Collections) · ROI of $20.65 for each dollar invested in destination marketing &;. N.ples Marco Is1and ~~~~- Park Facilities Benefits . North Collier Regional Park - Soccer, lacrosse, softball - Basketball, other indoor events - Fun'n Sun Lagoon customers . Vanderbilt Beach Park - EVP Volleyball - Skimboard Championships . Park Facilities Revenue from Sports Council Events - Field usage fees revenue from . FY 09 $4,500 . FY 10 thru June $6,500 . $19,400 total for past three year - Hotel Rebate Contributions - Park Share 60% . FY 09 $12,531 . FY 10 thru June $11,235 . $39,387 total for past three years - Concession Revenues from above events . FY 09 $51,000 . FY 10 thru June $33,500 8/17/2010 4 .' 16 , 1 B 13 8/17/2010 Giii>. Napa Marcolsland ~E~~ _.........<:00... .,.""....-r-- The Next Steps · PARAB discussion and recommendations · Recommendations to BCC - Fund 183 Reallocation on September 14 - Long term funding solution to Bee Sept. 28 · Public Hearings if Ordinance or Policy is to be amended · Additional Funds Approval - By November 1 for Fund 183 - By mid year 2011 for long term funding solution Giii>. NapIa Marcolsland ~~~ Questions & Discussion " \ZII 5 ,~ \ ; Reference Materials 16 11 B 13 G!iii. Naples Marwlsland ~E~~ .........0...'" co........ G!iii. NapIcs Mateo w-t ~~~~. Winter Northern U.S. Campaign Overview · Leisure traveler focused campaign · Markets: - New York/New Jersey, Chicago and Philadelphia - Some national internet exposure · Campaign Timing: January 1~- March 14th 2010 · Media: Spot and cable television, online, e-mail, print 8/17/2010 6 16 I J d 13 Glii. Naples Marwlsland ~ EYerJlIadcs~ ~......-..g.,.. aC>........~ Winter Northern u.s. Campaign Television Glii. Naples MattoIsWld ~~~- Winter Northern u.s. Campaign Print 8/17/2010 7 16 11 B 13 8/17/2010 &;;;. Naples Marwlsland ~E~~ ..........D>... co......... Winter Northern U.S. Campaign Key Performance Indicators 2.009 99,095 12.,153 3,32.8 632.,430 470,700 $5,632.,445 2.010 12.2.,699 2.0,943 4,430 672.,660 495,300 $6,117,495 Difference lliI a.a 2.3,604 +23.8~ 8,790 +72.3~ 1,102. +33.1lM1 40,2.30 +6.4% 2.4,600 +5.2lM1 $485,050 +8.6lM1 OTax collections reported in February-April 2009/2010 (representing 1st Quarter) Source: Miles Media Group, Phase V of Southwest Florida, Research Data Services & Collier County Tax Collector &;;; Naples MarwIsWld ~~~~- Advertising Target Market ROI Winter Campaign Total Visitor Winter ROI Per Markets Expenditures Campaign Promotional Investment Dollar Invested New York/New Jersey $9,661,077 $409,180 $23.61 Chicago $6,571,765 $281,725 $23.33 Philadelphia $3,772,685 $267,688 $14.09 Direct Visitor Expenditures $20,005,527 $958,593 $20.87 Economic Impact (Direct and $29,828,241 $958.593 $31.12 Indirect) Source: Research Data Services Inc. & Implan 8 16 , 1 B 13 8/17/2010 rA Naples Marcobland ~ E.ergIalb~ .................. C<o.........~ In-state Summer Campaign Message . ParadiseCoast.com/Summer - Digital Summer Fun Guide - Days of Summer Event countdown - Paradise Promise link Area offers - Customized Twitter page rA Naples Marcobland ~~~~- In-state Summer Campaign . Recently adjusted to reflect oil-free Paradise Promise message, while still conveying summer value - TV spot - It...still clear and NOAA forecasters say it will stay that way.1t Less than 1 % chance of getting all .. rlahO"'Lli (: ~r:~~,-C -3r-,,1;~,!!,,;,C-t.,ph€<ri,: :. j'1~ ..,,~tra~;':J~ .. . .. f' . :J..' \v\V\\'. F.J c1r8rli SC'-('O;t~t. corn/Promise 1-f;(;D-2."scape 9 (~ 16 , 1 -' 13 8/17/2010 I'A. Naples Ma.rcoWand ~E~~ ............... <:>,... c::. 0........ In-state Summer Campaign Message &;;;. NapJe. Mateo Wand ~~~~. In-state Spring/Summer Campaign · Area Visitation from Florida consistently higher over 2009, since campaign launch. 60000 F=2OO91 ~ 55000 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 APRil MAY JUNE Source: Research Data Services Inc. 10 16 11 GF>. Niplcs Marwlsland ~ EYCrgIadcs~ ~........... D.... CC>........~ Escape Right Here Campaign Message With these deals and adYemies, )(llf summervacarbn's right here. O___~O_.__~.,"'.. . ,..w-$-".............~i;~,.-.......~~""_~,;. .... . . .r"" )OO..._MOo~~_~.,..~~""~<"'~a i... .\~ ___JII'.__~."'';'':W~."..>*..,,~ _ - , ~Q'\f._lIit~,....~~ -l-,.......'~I!pol_ ....---......"'- m............. ..~f.ft~~~:...rtl"+t~ !I.A.<m!'W:t i ___~~J\..;II:'lg~... · "Which Getaway are you?" itineraries · Days of Summer Event Calendar and Countdown · Area specials GF>. Naples Matcolsland ~~~~. Escape Right Here Campaign Resu Its to-date · Visitation to ParadiseCoast.com from the Ft. Myers/Naples DMA increased 23% over 2009 (June 1st to August 9th) · "Escape Right Here" special deals Page · "Book Now" button was the th'ird highest click thru Source: Miles Media Group 8 15/17/2010 11 " .~ . ." 16 , 1 J 13 8/17/2010 ~ Niplcs Marw&land ~~~~. Authorized Uses of TOT (FS 125.0104) 1. To acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, or promote one or more publicly owned and operated convention centers, sports stadiums, sports arenas, coliseums, or auditoriums, or museums that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-proflt organizations and open to the public, within the boundaries of the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied. Tax revenues received pursuant to this section may also be used for promotion of zoological parks that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-proflt organizations and open to the public. However, these purposes may be implemented through service contracts and leases with lessees with sufficient expertise or financial capability to operate such facilities; 2. To promote and advertise tourism in the State of Florida and nationally and internationally; however, if tax revenues are expended for an activity, service, venue, or event, the activity, service, venue, or event shall have as one of its main purposes the attraction of tourists as evidenced by the promotion of the activity, service, venue, or event to tourists; ~ NipIes Marw&land ~~~~~. Authorized Uses of TOT 3. To fund convention bureaus, tourist bureaus, tourist information centers, and news bureaus as county agencies or by contract with the chambers of commerce or similar associations in the county, which may include any indirect administrative costs for services performed by the county on behalf of the promotion agency; or 4. To finance beach park facilities or beach improvement, maintenance, renourishment, restoration, and erosion control, including shoreline protection, enhancement, cleanup, or restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access as those uses relate to the physical preservation of the beach, shoreline, or inland lake or river. However, any funds identified by a county as the local matching source for beach renourishment, restoration, or erosion control projects included in the long-range budget plan of the state's Beach Management Plan, pursuant to s. 161.091. or funds contractually obligated by a county in the financial plan for a federally authorized shore protection project may not be used or loaned for any other purpose. 12 16 j .' J. 813 8/17/2010 ~ Napln Marc:oJsland ~E~~ ............. 0.... c:: ""....,... 1. Pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility, or the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a retained spring training franchise facility, either publicly owned and operated, or publicly owned and operated by the owner of a professional sports franchise or other lessee with sufficient expertise or financial capability to operate such facility, and to pay the planning and design costs incurred prior to the issuance of such bonds. 2. Pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a convention center, and to pay the planning and design costs incurred prior to the issuance of such bonds. 3. Pay the operation and maintenance costs of a convention center for a period of up to 10 years. Only counties that have elected to levy the tax for the purposes authorized in subparagraph 2. may use the tax for the purposes enumerated in this subparagraph. Any county that elects to levy the tax for the purposes authorized in subparagraph 2. after July 1, 2000, may use the proceeds of the tax to pay the operation and maintenance costs of a convention center for the life of the bonds. 4. Promote and advertise tourism in the State of Florida and nationally and internationally; however, if tax revenues are expended for an activity, service, venue, or event, the activity, service, venue, or event shall have as one of its main purposes the attraction of tourists as evidenced by the promotion of the activity, service, venue, or event to tourists. 13 , EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 I 1 B 13 Consideration to Redirect Beach Park Facility Funds as outlined below. OBJECTIVE: The BCC has requested that the P&RAB and CAC review, discuss and make a recommendation as to whether: 1. The Beach Park Facility - TOC Fund 183 should be used to provide $1,000,000 from the Beach Park Facility fund to the Tourism Department for emergency advertizing. 2. Whether the Beach Park Facility Fund 183 and the Museum TOC fund should be permanently reallocated to provide for annual destination marketing. It is anticipated that an additional $2,000,000 is required for annual destination marketing. 3. If funds are recommended to be reallocated, what reallocation should be considered from each of these funds? CONSIDERATIONS: The P&RAB and CAC are committed to tourism as a vital industry within Collier County. It is also supportive of identifying and securing the necessary funding to provide an effective tourism marketing program. The P&RAB and CAC also recognizes that our beaches and the visitor "beach" experience is the single most important tourist draw to Collier County. Keeping our beaches and the beach experience our visitors enjoy healthy and attractive to tourists should be the single most important objective of the TOC, P&RAB and the CAC advisory committees. Beach park facilities are critical to the successful beach experience and memory our visitors take away from Collier County. To have a successful beach experience; 1. The beaches must be clean, attractive and environmentally healthy with adequate parking access. 2. An attractive beach park facility must exist that provides water; clean, well maintained and attractive bathrooms; a concession and the ability to provide for personnel protection from lighting, storm and sun. 3. With these facilities/amenities, visitors generally do not spread out more that 100 yards on either side of a facility. 4. These facilities are critical to inland hoteliers and visitors that do not have direct access to the beach. Beach Park Facilities, Fund 183 receives approximately $2,000,000 per year to construct, refurbish and perform major maintenance activities for beach park facilities throughout the County. Funds normally accumulate in reserve until sufficient funds are available to complete a significant project. Approximately $4,000,000 is currently in reserves to fund major bathroom refurbishments and parking enhancements in the future. A copy of the five year capital program for beach park facilities is attached. , 16 1 .L 813 ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Coastal Advisory Committee should consider the following issues: 1. The P&RAB and CAC support a onetime re-allocation of $1,000,000 from the Beach Park Facilities Fund 183 to tourism to support the emergency marketing effort. 2. That the P&RAB and CAC not support any reallocation of funds that would have a detrimental effect on any existing county program or operation. 3. That the P&RAB and CAC not support any permanent reallocation of TDC funds from the existing 4% allocation. 4. That the P&RAB and CJSJ:: support a comprehensive long term program that provides for sufficient funding to perform year round marketing of this destination that is consistent with other destinations that we are competing against. FISCAL IMPACT: The Source of funds is from Category "A" Tourist Development Tax fund 183. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has not been reviewed or approved by the County Attorney's Office. RECOMMENDATION: The following are offered for consideration: 1. The P&RAB and CAC support a onetime re-allocation of $1,000,000 from the Beach Park Facilities Fund 183 to tourism to support the emergency marketing effort. 2. That the P&RAB and CAC not support any reallocation of funds that would have a detrimental effect on any existing county program or operation. 3. That the P&RAB and CAC not support any permanent reallocation of TDC funds from the existing 4% allocation. 4. That the P&RAB and CAC support a comprehensive long term program that provides for sufficient funding to perform year round marketing of this destination that is consistent with other destinations that we are competing against. PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin , ft) z o i= o w .., o a: Q. o Z ;:) LL CO') cr:l .... :' c( ~ o CI S " o o o I- '" ..l ... I- o I- llQQl~l~ll==lll~llll~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~!~ ~ ft ~ g ~ ~ ... ft ~ ~, H 00 ~~ ~ ... ;;; ft g ; x e. ~ 5 ft ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" ~~ '" '" '" '" '" '" ::l 8 -0 a ft ~, ~ ,.: _ _ :::> 0 '" '" '" '" ~g ... N g ~ , ... ~ I c ;;~ (5 ~ gi_ ~ ~gu- ~ ~Ei - ~ ~ "0 U :3-2 ~e~ ; .:;_~ c] ~~~ 9 ~~f~ ~ ~ ~ _~ 8 i _ g ~ 1 ~ ~] ~~<_~8~~~8 :~ i~1~E~~~1~~18iJ t. r: ~~ii~g_€.~~~~~e~.r.:Ia! ~j. ~:l~%.!1jt~~!III~~ ~.fft '" ~c"-"R-,,"'...E~~ee_,g!!.;; 10"'~ Iol "~P!iUi:d;;oll8.8.=~Ji1i~"l~~ VJ ': ~=~~~~a1~ ~~~J:~~~~~ ~J! ~ !~~~~~~~~ ~~~jjJl~ ~,h~j >( e ~ ~ "5 1 i ~ G .; ~ 'i ~ ::: ~ ~ g ~ ~ g ;J. ~ Iol 1l.1Ilo>>>Zz....lIloc5o::Euolloll.;:;J!c5 !! g. ~ ~.... ~ ~ t.,;'?' ~ l ~ ~~3 u ~g ...:ti ~ :;! l :;: ::i ~ ~ :i ~ g ~ l :;: ~ ! ! ~ ~ :i rri '" g ~l~ :;l ~ ~. .. '0 .. J. . <Jl .. c Os l " c e . . e .. i ~~~ o_~ ',c "" '0 1:~! :~ a] ~~~ <..:,..; ~ Ii .. '0 I- J. . <Jl o ~ -:i o .,; ~~ ~~ ~ :;- I- o I- o o ... ...; on o .... ~- ~ .; ~ ~ ~; >- ... o o ... ...; o "'l ... l~ ~ ~ ~ >- ... o o ... ...; o o ...; N l ~ a ~ ~ i:: o ... "!. 00 .,; ~- .;~ ~ ~; >- ... o ~ .... '" 00. U' ~ ~ ~ >- ... '" Iol '" Z Iol Il. ~ Iol ..J < ... o ... :( c. :: '" ~ g; ~ u. ~ ~ ~ t ,5 S ::~J ~':" ~~c:. ~i ~ , i:.!t w i: ~ ~ ;;J~~~iiE~- ~aci!~G:~f~ ,;~=!l.;2; ~1:"'~-ec", a:!~~e~~; =~ ~ '" g ~ ==gClQ '" ~ ~ 0 M ~ .,; 16 I = 0 o ~ o ... :!i '" g r- ,.: .., o .... = 0 o r- ,.: .., o ..; = 0 o r- ,.: .., o .... = 0 o r- ,.: .., o .... Iol ;;J Z Iol ;.. Iol a: ..J < ... o ... 0= ~H r-.., ::l- o 00 00 ..; r- ... ~~ ~3 o ... ... ,.: ::l g~ ~~ ~~ o ... "'l .., on ~~ .... on_ ~" o ... r- o 00 "l ~~ ..,:11 r-_ r--:.~ '? o ... 00 :! "i' 0= o r- oO on ...; o o r- oO on ...; '" ... '-l = '" .. z ... '-l ~ ~a: '-l'C '" :- ~ ~ ..l 0 ~~ z .. ~~ '-l Of: ... OJ .. co -; = 'C .. = '"" 1 B13 , . . . 1 1! I:J I ) 16 i , .,.4). ..,. • $....A • 1....i La 0 t.. • 1 . , . ii= Iii , 0 . c.....4 . ..„1„.. 0 . . 8 i 4 1 CA °mill A o•-•• ...• CA oL I ,114. olio • 1). cra : .11. f r P:J o c rt) cL, „....., , ‘„,,,i rD rs) $1,) s= 20 1-1 5 i..., • 0 litah a , ,,J.4.,J..!'",,,, _ tt; IA' ' ' 1:2" /II 0 °I.1"1 . • cil* ; Za* C • i --,1, _ . r'4'. % ' 0 2g) N Z (!21 , rj .... 0•11.6 • .:0 sa..4 ,. ,, . P.) i W ' Il'I : . rti tOS'. Cil poimkP '' 1 1 n loof °Z..5 ',- CA ...,._ .,. , . t$ e 4=ilmemi 14144ami , .P. ' (ID 0 -*1 101.1• 0) Owl• ilini •CaOS' • '‘j . ' 1..,. . - CO cd1 • '7' 1......1 r .. rD ‘.. . . , rt) (T) • 0 . , . N oti,- , ,r. •• pi,) III - , cri is.,,,,-,4,0'.:-• cr n : . 1\7 p I orl a 6 . .. , r...) n 1 J wric 1—A rc) .... . . 0 ,T 41„T ,, . . • 1 . ' o. i -,.... 1" 4 # ' , -, it. . 4 _., r ' • ' -- i ... ' :.- - — $i :i ,- ,:y; ... , w . 0 :,, ei i , •-. _ ' ,.••'•, • 1-1 • ""• i ''.., t$ tr 1 . . . .„..‘ ..... . .r• • , •• .. .... . , -, 411 , 0 . i - ow., -:,,- .4.,-, •,,,,,,, .... 2 o: \ ..,..; fl"' Z. 274 Ar ' ..■ i F ..„ i .,4 i , _._____, f,, (i) CD , III 0 ,..0 .4 .' k '0, g fa la - x g '' ' - - ' I f J • , ..,— //10 % co 8 r .., 0, 0 Eti clot , (9 . 0 .).0. c . toak i. , . ' , ' * ' f g g .1::. -2' 01;0 (0..... "............. 1 ' ,„ ..,, _ - - , ,.....- '' '""1*.• t, . ,,,..4 - Collier Count y Parks & Recreation and BiG MAMA of B103.9 Golf Benefit for ,\ \ -iow int, Alp -41" pro ect STAR S°h J s� a N r0 d e4 a it r:21 rt of i 1 - Strand Golf & Country Club September 18, 2010 / 8:30 a.m. Shotgun Four person scramble $60 per player (Includes 18 holes of golf, lunch, gift bag & raffle prizes) to Closest to the pin (Men & Women) Reservations contact Ed Torroni 252-4090 • edtorroni @colliergov.net 6 Longest Drive (Men & Women) WWW.collierparks.corn 6,Lowest Team Score --_ i Southwest Florida's' Hole In One Parks , E1103.51(Rocr 0 , on wxKe FM 460 Silent Auction ,4,, . 6050/50 Raffle- $5/1 chance •$10/3 chances •$20/arm length n •• I Collier Ailnit4? 13 Parks & Recreation and , ., ojec STAR o BiG MAMA of B103.9 3 • • _•'a Golf Benefit Av , , .\, , N/ for --. ,,i, , .0- Project HOLE `O�y1ER COVHT). -SPONSORSHIP fl103.s Roc - o on On Saturday, September 18, Play coniuctb'Ditrootr 2010, Collier County Parks & Please return sponsorship form by Recreation and BiG MAMA September 10, 2010 and make your will hold its First Golf Benefit for check payable to: Project STAR r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 at Strand Golf& Country Club Project STAR Donation Fund in Naples, FL. 1 1 1 15000 Livingston Rd. 1 All proceeds for this Naples, FL 34109 tournament will help send a 1 1 child to our Summer Camp Program, Business Name. After School Program 1 1 or any program offered by Collier County 1 1 Parks and Recreation. 1 Contact Per- 1 son: We would like to invite you I 1 to sponsor a hole. We will dis-Ilay the sponsor sign at one I Daytime Phone: 1 of fie 18 holes. You will also be 1 1 listed in the golf tournament ___ program and on the event banner. I We would like to sponsor a hole sign. I am 1 enclosing a photocopy of our logo along with For more information contact I this registration form to the address listed 1 Peg Ruby at 1 or emailing a jpeg file to pegruby @colliergov.net 1 252-4045 or 252-4000 II Enclosed is our check payable tno , 0.5, pegruby @colliergov.net I Project STAR Donation Fund ojer � i%v 1 R,,,,-- ' yr 'f I You can make a difference in a child's life! `v a tea 1 $ 100 per si n 1 g z, 1 _.;...., I. _ _ _ ... ... _ _ _ .... ... _ _ , I~~~~~~~~, ~~~ng 1~!J.2o~i4 Coyle ~ESUFTHECO~rmRCUUNIYTOmuST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL MEETING v Naples, Florida, January 25,2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Tourist Development Council in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in a REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida with the following members present: ~. Chairman: Commissioner Fred Coyle Vice Chairman: Murray H. Hendel Susan Becker Clark Hill Rick Medwedeff Robert Miller Ed (Ski) Olesky John Sorey, III (Via Teleconference) Rob Popoff (Excused) ALSO PRESENT: Jack Wert, Tourism Director Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management Director Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorn.. Corres: Kelly Green, Tourist Tax Coordinator Call: t D Item ,: 1 :: -.,;ps '}: .~ . ~:i 16 I 1 Jil4,,201O I. Call to Order - Chairman Coyle Chairman Coyle called the meeting to order at 9:00 A.M. II. Pledge of Allegiance Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call A quorum was established. Mr. Olesky moved to allow Mr. Sorey to participate in the meeting via teleconference. Second by Ms. Becker. Carried unanimously 7-0. IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. Hill moved to approve the Agenda subject to the following changes: . Updated information on Item VIA - Mote Marine Proposal . Updated information on Item VII.2 - Visitor Information Specialist . Updated information on Item VIlA - Marco Island Museum Funding . Item VIII.1e - Tax Collections - CC Tax Collector to be heard as item VIII.1 a . Item VIII. 1 b. To follow, remaining items to be renumbered accordingly. . Item VIII.2.e to be heard as item VIII.2a, remaining items to be renumbered accordingly. Second by Mr. Olesky. Carried unanimously 8-0. V. Approval of TDC Minutes 1. Regular Meeting November 23, 2009 Mr. Hendel moved to approve the minutes of the November 23, 2009 meeting subject to the following change: . Page 8, Item X. line 1 from "1 :00 pm - 5:00 pm" to "3:00 to 5 pm" Second by Mr. Olesky. Carried unanimously 8-0. VI. New Business 1. Elect Vice-Chairman Ms. Becker moved to nominate Mr. Hendel as Vice Chairman of the Tourist Development Council. Second by Mr. Medwedeff. Carried unanimously 8-0. 2. TDC Meeting Frequency Jack Wert, Tourism Director presented the Executive Summary "Change in Frequency of Tourist Development Council (I'DC) meetings" dated January 25, 2010 for review. He requested the Council consider changing the meeting schedule to bi-monthly meetings with the next meeting being in March 2010. Mr. Hill noted he preferred to maintain the existing schedule due to the many critical issues the Council deals with at this point in time. Mr. Sorey noted, should pending business warrant it, there is a provision to call a "Special Meeting" in an offmonth. :-.r. 2 16 1'1 B.14 January 25, 2010 Ms. Becker recommended holding the Annual Workshop during the "Off Season. " Chairman Coyle recommended the bi-monthly meeting schedule proposed by Staff be approved with the understanding the Chairman may call for a meeting if business warrants it. Discussion occurred on the timing for the Annual Workshop or if it should be held later in the year coinciding with the budget process and/or at a time when the County is in a better position to deal with any issues related to the possible relocation the Chicago Cubs Spring Training Facility to Naples? The Council determined to re-schedule the Annual TDC/BCC Workshop from February 10, 2010 to late March or early April. The Council determined to change the frequency ofTDC meetings to a bi-monthly schedule, unless Council business requires a meeting in the off month. 3. Discussion Topics for February 10,2010 BCCrrDC Workshop Jack Wert presented the Executive Summary "Discussion Topic Suggestionsfor February 10,2010 Annual Joint BCC/TDC Workshop" dated January 25,2010. The following topics were suggested: · Marco Island Museum Funding · Non-County Owned Museum Grants (Category C-2) for FY 11 · Changes to TDC Ordinance to fund future year-round destination marketing. · Chicago Cubs Spring Training Facility feasibility study and funding sources. . · Return on Investment (RDI) measurement techniques to improve reporting The Council noted some of the topics may be vented by the Council, as opposed to requesting BCC direction in the Workshop (i.e. refining ROI measurements). Jack Wert noted he has the necessary input to prepare the Agenda for the Workshop. 4. Mote Marine Proposal Jack Wert presented the Executive Summary "Mote Marine Proposalfor "Red Tide Monitoring" totaling $3,800" dated January 25, 2010 for review. He noted: · The County currently utilizes the "Red Tide Monitoring Program" developed by Mote Marine. · County Staff is issued Blackberry's giving them the ability to upload beach water quality samples to the internet. · The uploaded sample results are utilized to develop a database to report "Red Tide" conditions at area beaches. · The County is then notified if a "Red Tide Alert" is declared, with Staff providing notification to the public of the conditions via signs on the beach. 3 16 l 1 B 1~25,2olO . The Program also allows the public to monitor beach conditions through the internet. . The funding for the Blackberry devices has expired and Mote Marine contacted the Counties involved in the Program for assistance in funding the devices. . The total funding for all Counties involved is approximately $17,000, Collier County's share to be $3,800. Staff is recommending funding the Program with $1,900 each to be dedicated from Category A and Category B funds. Mr. Hendel moved to approve Staffs recommendation. Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management stated he is not in favor of funding the item, as it is a "Tourism" issue, not a "Beach Maintenance" issue. The Department does not have available funding to support the Program. Jack Wert noted the County would continue to monitor beach water quality without the Program, utilize the signage on the beach, but further dissemination of the information will be limited. Discussion occurred noting the County has ample opportunities (in lieu of the Program) to provide the notifications to the public. Without a second, the motion was not considered. VII. Old Business 1. Chicago Cubs Spring Training Facility Report (Information Only) Mr. Hendel provided the following update: . The Board of Directors of the Chicago Cubs reviewed the proposal submitted by the Naples entrepreneurs wishing to re-Iocate the Cubs spring training facility to Collier County. . The Cubs Facility is currently located in the city of Mesa, Arizona, who also submitted a proposal to keep the Cubs in Mesa. . The Directors voted on the proposals, resulting in a tie vote. . The Cubs organization has decided to allow Mesa to provide a revised proposal. . No formal decision has been made by the Cubs organization on the location of the new Spring Training Facility Discussion occurred on how TDC funding may be involved in any proposals for the relocation (the Lodging Associations position on increasing the Tourist Tax to 5% or using Tourist Taxes through re-directions of funding at the current 4% level, etc.). It was noted any discussions or decisions on these issues raised are pre-mature given the status of the decision to be made by the Cubs organization. 4 ", 16 I 1 ~anL'5,2010 , . 2. Visitor Information Specialist Jack Wert presented the Executive Summary "Visitor Information Center Specialist" dated January 25, 2010 for review. He noted: · It was brought to the attention of the TDC Subcommittee (when considering revisions in Tourist funding,) there is a lack of coordination between the areas Visitors Center. · The Staff person would have a myriad of duties included but not limited to: ensuring the Visitor Centers have consistent publications, coordinating monthly meetings between Chamber Executives, coordinating publications and maps, recruiting volunteers, etc. · The Chamber of Commerce will provide the office space for the employee. · The position is for a 1 year trial period and requires funding by the TDC in the amount of $64,740. Speaker Michelle Klinowski, Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce reviewed the budget for the position, noting the total expenses per year including payroll, office overhead expenses, etc. is $74,740. The Chamber is donating funds equaling a value of$10,000 making the expense for the Tourist Development Council $64,740 for the year. Mr. Hendel moved to approve (recommend to the Board of County Commissioners funding the position as outlined by StafJ). Second by Ms. Becker. Carried unanimously 8-0. 3. Naples Museum of Art Grant Agreement Amendment Jack Wert presented the Executive Summary "Amendment to Naples Museum of Art, Inc. FY 10 Grant Agreement to change the effective dates" dated January 25, 2010 for review. Mr. Sorey moved to approve (recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners) the amendment to the Naples Museum of Art, Inc. FY 10 Grant Agreement. Second by Mr. HendeL Carried unanimously 8-0. 4. Marco Island Museum Funding Jack Wert presented the Executive Summary "Marco Island Museum Funding Discussion" dated January 25, 2010 for review. He noted: · The TDC had previously authorized a Tourist Tax Grant in the amount of $100,000 for the exhibit project at the Museum. · The City of Marco Island has offered a matching grant opportunity up to $350,000 to assist in funding the exhibit project. · Paradise Advertising and Marketing, Inc. has offered to donate up to $100,000 of the media commissions to increased marketing efforts for the TDC to be due on the additional $1 M dollars allocated to marketing from the re-direction of Beach Reserves. The firm's intent is to allow the TDC to re-invest the $100,000 into marketing efforts. 5 \. 16 , 1 t~25,2010 . The County may be able to allocate up to $150,000 in General Fund Capital Reserves towards the exhibit project. The Council requested clarification on how the $700,000 of funds would be utilized. Marla Ramsey, Director noted it is a one time capital expenditure for exhibits and displays primarily for the "Calussa Room." The funds from the General Fund Capital Reserves are available for use. Discussion occurred on the concept of re-directing Paradise Advertising's donation from marketing to the funding Museum exhibits. It was noted Paradise Advertising could make the donation separately, as they see fit, following the payments by the County for the Media Commissions. Mr. Sorey moved to support the conceptfor thefunding of the Marco Island Museum Exhibit Project and recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the concept (a $100,000 was previously approvedfor allocation to the exhibits by the TDC. Paradise Advertising'sfunds belong with themfor utilization as they see fit, and the $150,000 from the General Fund Capital Reserve is available, however the funds are not in the purview of the TDC.) Second by Mr. Medwedeff. Cedar Hames, Paradise Advertising noted he would rely on the Council's direction regarding the proposed $100,000 donation The Council encouraged Paradise Advertising and Marketing, Inc. to donate the $100,000 in question to the Marco Island Museum Exhibit Project Carried unanimously 8-0. Break: 10:39 am Reconvened: 10:55 am VIII. Staff Report Presentations 1. Section I - Marketing Partners a. Tax Collections - CC Tax Collector Jack Wert presented the "Tourist Tax Collection" data updated through December 2009. b. Klages Research Report Dr. Walter Klages, Research Data Services, Inc. presented "Collier County Tourism Research, December 2009" dated January 25, 2010 to the Council i. Focus Group Research Results Jack Wert presented the "Collier County Tourism Research 2009 Qualitative Research" prepared by Research Data Services, Inc, dated 6 16 j 1 B 14 January 25,2010 & January 25, 2010 to the Council. c. Paradise Advertising Fran Vaccaro, Paradise Advertising provided an update on the Winter Northern Campaign marketing efforts for the region including television, online and print media advertising. Dave DiMaggio, Paradise Advertising provided an overview on the production of recent TV advertisements utilized in marketing the region. Jeff Bunting, Paradise Advertising provided an overview of recent photographic productions to be utilized in marketing the region. d. Web site Activity - Miles Media Submitted e. Search Engine Optimization - SMT, Inc. Submitted f. Fulfillment & Inquiry Summary - Phase V Submitted 2. Section II - Staff Department Reports The following Reports were submitted by Staff: a. Director's Report b. Sales Manager Report c. P.R. Manager Report d. Film Coordinator Report e. Sports Marketing Report f. International Representatives IX. Detailed Staff Reports Submitted X. Announcements 1. BCC-TDC Joint Workshop, February 10,2010 (3:00 pm - 5:00 pm) Canceled XI. Audience Input & Discussion None XII. Council Discussion Ms. Becker reported: · Proposed revisions to the "evaluation form" (for Grant Recipients) are still under consideration. · The merging of the two visitor guides (Chamber of Commerce and Convention and Visitors Bureau) as recommended by the TDC Subcommittee may not be possible (due to regulations.) 7 .,. ~ .... .. 8.14 January 25, 2010 & Jack Wert noted the new Visitor Information Specialist may provide an avenue to reduce duplications in Guides. The Official Tourist Map continues to be developed. XIII. Next Scheduled Meeting Date/Location - March 22, 2010 - 9:00 AM Collier County Government Center, Administration BLDG. F, 3rd Floor, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 11 :55 A.M. COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as presented or as amended 8 I~~~'~~I' =5 ./ *-" 16 1_ 814 Henning 1""-;; May 3, 2010 Coyle Coletta t/ .1MINBffi~VF THE COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL MEETING v .. ~ " '-. . Naples, Florida, May 3, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Tourist Development Council in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in a SPECIAL SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida with the following members present: Chairman: Commissioner Fred Coyle Vice Chairman: Murray H. Hendel Susan Becker Clark Hill Rick Medwedeff (Excused) Robert Miller (Excused) Ed (Ski) Olesky John Sorey III Jerry Gibson ALSO PRESENT: Jack Wert, Tourism Director Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management Director Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney, (' . . ~I". vorres. Kelly Green, Tounst Tax Coordinator . .J,...... 1 3 :) . . ~~ ' , "\ 16 If 1 81.4 May 3, 2010 ... I. Call to Order - Chairman Coyle Chairman Coyle called the meeting to order at 9:00 A.M. II. Pledge of Allegiance Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call A quorum was established. IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. Sorey moved to approve the Agenda subject to the following additions: Item V.2 - Resolution for Emergency Renourishment Item V.3 - Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Update (to be heard before items 1 and 2) Second by Mr. Olesky. Carried unanimously 7-0. V. New Business 3. Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Update Dan Summers, Director, Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services was available via teleconference and provided update on the Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico. A Power point presentation on the functions and duties of his Agency and an update on the spill was submitted to the members via email. The County is monitoring the situation closely and prepared to implement any necessary actions immediately, if required. There is a 1995 Inlet Plan that provides for responses to oil spills which may be utilized in an emergency. Collier County does not stock the necessary amounts of dispersants or other materials that may be required to deal with an oil slick of this potential magnitude and will rely on outside Agencies/parties to provide assistance. The Council recommended the following: . Before the spill reaches a point of danger to the County, Emergency Services Staff determine the quantity of materials (dispersants, oil spill containment booming, etc.) required from the outside Agencies/parties and provide the list to them to ensure adequate quantities are available for use in Collier County. . Convention and Visitor Bureau Staff consider implementing an emergency advertising plan to inform the public on how Collier County has not been affected by the spill. . Provide web site updates for potential tourists on the status of the spills effect on the County. Dan Summers noted Emergency Services could undertake the requested task. Jack Wert, Tourism Director noted consideration for an emergency advertising plan is already underway and updates on the oil spills status may be added to the website. 2 16JIB14 May 3, 2010 . 1. Naples Emergency Beach Renourishment Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve the Doctors Pass and North Park Shore Emergency Beach Renourishment Resolution, make a finding that these beaches are critically eroded and TDC funds can be used for renourishment, authorize the expedited handling of a truck haul/inland sand source permit modification, waive the formal competitive thresholds in the Purchasing Policy based on a valid public emergency, and authorize the expenditure of$1.5M Category A Tourist Development Funds and authorize necessary budget amendments" dated May 3, 2010 for review. He noted: · There are two beach eroded hot spots in the County that currently require emergency Beach Re-nourishment - one South of Doctors Pass and one north of Doctors Pass in the vicinity of Park Shore. · The areas are subject to an existing permit for beach re-nourishment from Florida Department of Environmental Protection. · The Biological Opinion issued under the existing permit's re-nourishment template and requires work to be completed before May 1. · Staff is in the process of obtaining a permit amendment (for utilizing and inland sand source, truck hauling of the sand), and new Biological Opinion, to allow work after May 1 (during turtle nesting season.) · Staff is recommending, as an emergency measure, until the permit amendment is granted, placing approximately 2000 - 3000 CY of sand on the dune, landward of the current Mean High Water just south of Doctors Pass in front of Gulf View and Indies West Condominiums. The work may be completed without any permit alterations. · The remaining 37,000 CY of sand will be placed on the beach at both locations (on the seaward and landward side of the MHW) after the new Biological Opinion and permit modifications are issued. · The sand will be delivered by trucks and placed on the beach via a conveyor system to limit the heavy equipment operation on the beach. Mr. Hendel stated he resides in the Park Shore area, had voted for the emergency re-nourishment proposed at both locations, but after site visits, he recommends the area not be included in the proposed expenditure. He also recommended delaying the activity pending receipt of more information. Mr. Sorey provided a brief history of the issue noting the Coastal Advisory Committee originally recommended approval of an expenditure of $375,000 to place approximately 10,000 CY of sand at the two eroded beach hot spots. It has now been determined 10,000 CY of material will not be adequate to stabilize the areas for 3 years as it is eroding 10,000 CY on an annual basis. It is estimated approximately 40,000 CY of sand will be required to stabilize the areas. The intent of the proposal is to protect the upland structure of the beach including walkways, adjacent to the beach, etc. 3 16 I 1 B !!:3,2010 Commissioner Coyle questioned if the activity should be delayed until the potential effects of the oil spill have been realized by the County and/or a permanent solution to the erosion problem has been developed. Gary McAlpin noted the effects of the oil spill will be continually monitored and the County will not complete the proposed re-nourishment in any areas that are threatened by possible oil contamination. The intent is to attempt to ensure the areas in question are protected for the hurricane season. He noted the CAC has recommended Staff develop a permanent solution to the erosion problems. The permanent solutions to all eroded beach hot spots within the County will be studied under the scope of work for the next beach re-nourishment. Mr. Hendel moved to recommend Phase I of the proposal re-nourishment of the (the area just South of Doctors Pass) as proposed by Staff, and to delay Phase II (re-nourishment of the Park Shore Beach area) until further studies have been completed and a permanent solution is developed for stabilizing the beach in the area just south of Doctors Pass. Second by Mr. Hill. Under Council/Staff discussion, Gary McAlpin noted: . Ifthe projects are completed separately, there will be approximately a $75,000 cost for re-mobilization to complete the work proposed in Phase II. . Phase I may be completed for a cost of approximately $1.1 M - $1.2M. . The proposal is to place approximately 27,000 CY of sand in the area south of Doctors Pass and approximately 8,000 CY of sand in the Park Shore area . If the sand is placed at this time, it will assist in reducing re-nourishment activities required in those areas during the next Cycle. Motion carried 4 'yes" - 3 "no." Chairman Coyle, Mr. Olesky and Mr. Sorey voted "no." Commissioner Coyle recommended the Committee review the 6 recommendations provided on page 2 of the Executive Summary and take action. Recommendation # 1 Mr. Hill moved to recommend an Emergency Resolution be approved authorizing the use of emergency measures andfunds to address the severe beach erosion in the area just south of Doctors Pass and that action must be taken immediately. Second by Mr. Olesky. Carried unanimously 7-0. Recommendation #3 Mr. Sorey moved the beach is accessible to the public and meets the requirements in the RTDC Category "A: Funding Policy. The emergency re- nourishment is eligible for TDC Category ''A'' Funding and serves a public purpose. Second by Mr. Olesky. Carried unanimously7-0. 4 .-.. 16 11 B 14 May 3, 2010 . , 'L ("' . . . Recommendation #4 Mr. Hendel moved the formal competitive threshold in the Purchasing Policy be waived based on a valid public emergency and other State and local Statutes. Second by Mr. Olesky. Carried unanimously 8-0. Recommendation #5 Mr. Sorey moved to recommend an expenditure of up to $l.IM in TDC Category "A" Funding to accomplish the project. Second by Mr. Olesky. Motion carried unanimously 7 - O. Recommendation #6 Mr. Sorey moved to recommend authorization of the necessary budget amendments. Second by Mr. Olesky. Motion carried unanimously 7 - O. Discussion occurred on whether Staff should continue to purse the permits for both Phases of the proposed project at this time. Mr. Hendel moved to authorize Staff to proceed with the permit applicationsfor both Phase I and Phase II and return with recommendations for Phase II at the time Staff proposes a permanent solution to address the area outlined in the Phase I emergency expenditure. Second by Ms. Becker. Carried unanimously 7-0. 2. Resolution for Emergency Renourishment Gary McAlpin presented a proposed Resolution (no. 10-_) entitled "A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida declaring critically eroded beaches in the City of Naples to require emergency renourishment and makingfindings to support the public purpose of renourishment for review. Mr. Olesky moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed Resolution subject to the deletion to any references to re- nourishment of the Park Shore Beach area. Second by Ms. Becker. Motion carried 6 'yes" - 1 "no." Mr. Sorey voted "no. " Mr. Sorey noted his "no" vote was predicated on his preference to complete the re-nourishment of both areas in question at the same time (Park Shore Beach and the area just south of Doctors Pass). VI. Old Business None VII. Announcements None 5 16 11 B .14 May 3, 2010 . VIII. Audience Input & Discussion None IX. Council Discussion None X. Next Scheduled Meeting Date/Location - May 24, 2010 - 9:00 a.m. Collier County Government Center, Administration BLDG. F, 3rd Floor, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 11 :59 A.M. COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as presented or as amended 6 1.~:~~~1~~.' Fiala Halas Henning Coyle Coletta 6 I 1 B J1 4 July 26,2010 .L ~ BtN.lJ:r.~S.QF..THE COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL MEETING Naples, Florida, July 26, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Tourist Development Council in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in a REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida with the Following members present: Chairman: Commissioner Fred Coyle Vice Chairman: Murray H. Hendel Susan Becker Jerry Gibson Clark Hill Rick Medwedeff Robert Miller Ed (Ski) Olesky John Sorey III ALSO PRESENT: Jack Wert, Tourism Director Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management Director Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Assistant County Attorney Kelly Green, Tourist Tax Coordinator Misc. Corres: Date: Item#: 1 16 I 1 B t~26'2010 I. Call to Order - Chairman Coyle Chairman Coyle called the meeting to order at 9:00 AM II. Pledge of Allegiance Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call A quorum was established. IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. Olesky moved to add the following item to the Agenda: Item VII. 1 - Discussion of August Regularly Scheduled TDC meeting. Second by Ms. Becker. Carried unanimously 9-0. Mr. Hill moved to approve the Agenda subject to the above change. Second by Mr. Sorey. Carried unanimously 9-0. V. Approval of TDC Minutes 1. Regular Meeting June 28, 2010 Ms. Becker moved to approve the minutes of the June 28,2010 meeting. Second by Mr. Olesky. Carried unanimously 9-0. VI. New Business 1. TDC Ordinance Review Jack Wert submitted the Executive Summary "Review Tourist Development Tax Ordinance 92-60 as amended and County Beach and Beach Park Facilities Policy (10/25/2005) for possible changes to allocations in Category A and Category C to support a year-round marketing effort" dated July 26, 2010. Also provided for informational purposes was Fla. Stat. 125.0104 (2009) (regulating the Tourist Devel~ment Tax); Collier County Ordinance 2005-43 (establishing the levy ofthe 4 cent of Tourist Tax); Collier County Ordinance 2009-58 (amending the Ordinance to re-allocate Emergency Beach Funds to Marketing for 1 year) and the Collier County Tourist Development Category "A" Funding Policy. He noted the funds redirected from Emergency Beach reserves in the amount $1 M were invested in advertising beginning in January of201O and has provided an overall rate of return of$17.64 for every dollar invested. In addition, there has been an increase of approximately $~M of Tourist Tax Revenue over the past year. He presented a Slideshow noting without adequate dedicated funding sources for year around tourism marketing, the TDC must constantly request emergency marketing funds from the BCC. In order to initiate a year around marketing campaign for the region, the following may want to be considered: 1. Allocate a portion of the funds set aside for Beach Park Facilities (Fund 2 " 16 11 B 14 July 26, 2010 ...-. .. 183) currently set at an average of $2 million per year. 2. Allocate a portion of the Beach and Inlet Management funds (Fund 195) for marketing purposes. If pending FEMA reimbursements are received, the reserve funds should be sufficient to handle future re-nourishment projects. 3. Reduce or eliminate the amount in Category C-2 for non-county owned or operated Museum grants. 4. Reduce the amount allocated to County Museum Operations in Category C-l and stipulate that an increased amount of the remaining funds be allocated to marketing of the Museums. 5. Recommend an increase in the Tourist Development tax to 5% and dedicate the entire amount to destination marketing. Commissioner Coyle noted the Board of County Commissioners would want to ensure any decisions to alter the funding policies are vetted by all necessary stakeholders. Mr. Hendel noted he was Chairman of the TDC Subcommittee which previously recommended $1 M dollars of funds be re-directed from the Emergency Beach Reserves to advertising for FYI0 and FYll ($2M total.) The Board of County Commissioners did approve the redirection of funds for FYIO. If the Subcommittee had been aware funds were available from Fund 183, their recommendation would have differed. He recommended $IM from Fund 183 be redirected to advertising (for a 1 year period.) Mr. Sorey opposes redirecting funds from Beach re-nourishment. The County does not have the necessary funds to complete Beach re-nourishment projects without additional FEMA funds. He is in favor of a year-round marketing and to effectively fund it; consideration should be given to adding an additional cent to the Tourist Tax rate. Mr. Medwedeff noted the discussion is for the re-direction of Beach Park Facilities funds, not Beach re-nourishment funds. He opposes the concept of adding an additional cent to the Tourist Tax as it would negatively affect the hotel industry, especially in the area of group sales. Year-round marketing is necessary to help support the 30,000 tourist related jobs in the region. He requested clarification on when a decision for additional funding for advertising would need to be made by the BCC for the campaign to effectively be implemented and the amount of funds required. Jack Wert stated November, at the latest, would be when a decision should be made to increase marketing for FYll. At this point, $2M is budgeted for FY 11 advertising. To conduct a proper year-round campaign, approximately $4M would be required. On a related note, 25 percent of funds re-directed from Emergency Beach funds have been returned to its account due to Tourist Tax revenues. 3 M~ ,R 1lt 16 I 1 Ju~ 2t2dio Mr. Miller noted there has been a large increase in tourist activity in the Everglades. Ceasing the year-round advertising would lead to a halt in the momentum being gained from the implementation of the campaign. Mr. Hill noted the TDC Subcommittee was informed that the funds in Fund 183 were not available for re-direction. He recommended the Committee consider re- adjusting the funding allocations ofthe Tourist Tax to provide a long term solution in implementing a year-round advertising campaign. Ms. Becker noted the C-2 category has created a positive return in Tourist Tax revenues and the funding should remain or be increased. Speakers Bruce Gear noted tourism is a substantial revenue driver for the region and additional tourists lead to additional revenue. He is in favor of re-directing funds from Fund 183 to advertising and marketing and recommended the Committee review the funding requirements in general to provide additional funds for advertising. Hunter Hansen, Naples Grande Beach Resort stated a Committee member vote for an additional cent to be added to the Tourist Tax, or a vote to not increase funding year-round advertising is a "vote against tourism." Ed Staros, Ritz-Carlton noted the company employed 1,500 persons 2 years ago, with only 1,200 persons employed currently. He recommended the Committee review the funding allocation policy for the Tourist Tax. He opposes an increase of 1 percent to the Tourist Tax as it has a major negative effect on group sales as these planners do factor in the Tourist Tax rates when determining the location to hold events. Michelle Klinowski, Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce noted tourism is a significant percentage of area business which indirectly supports many other industries (construction, real estate, restaurants, retail, etc.) She is in favor of re- evaluating the current funding policy. Joyce McFarland, Marco Island Chamber of Commerce supports year-round marketing as the previous campaign was highly successful with a $17.64 return on investment for every dollar spent. Jill Barry, Naples Botanical Garden noted C-2 funding is utilized for out-of- area marketing in a different format than that of the CVB advertising campaign. She recommended continuing the funding source. Kathy Curatolo, CBIA supports the concept of year-round marketing for tourism as it stimulates more year-round tourist visits and assists in promoting business relocations to the area. 4 ..... . .~ 16 I tY~'~17 . . Steve McIntire, Collier County Hotel and Lodging Assoc. is not in favor of raising the Tourist Tax rate. The Association is in favor of maintaining the beaches, but expressed concern on the utilization of funds for capital expenditures for beach facilities such as the proposed improvements at Vanderbilt Beach. C-2 funding does provide a re-imbursement of revenues and is in favor of maintaining the funding. David Galloway recommended increased advertising not only in the US, but in international markets as well. The area needs a consistent marketing campaign. As an example, he noted Coca Cola is the most recognized product in the world, but still spends approximately $1 B per year on advertising. He recommended additional funds be expended to promote year-round advertising. Robin Demattia, Friends of Rookery Bay and Naples Art Assoc. noted the C-2 funding category is only 2 percent of the budget, but does provide a good rate of return on investment to the County. The advertising conducted by the organizations utilizing the funds is a different format than that of the CVB and assists in providing diversity in promotions for the region. She recommends the funding continue. Mr. Sorey requested clarification from Mr. Wert ifre-directing $IM to advertising, (increasing the FYll budget to $3M total) would be adequate to conduct an effective year-round campaign this fiscal year? Mr. Wert noted the $3M would allow an adequate campaign, without developing any new markets. $4 M would be more advantageous and would allow for additional marketing, increased website production, additional market research and public relation campaigns. Eventually, an annual expenditure of $5M would be optimal. Mr. Hendel recommended an update be provided at each TDC meeting on the status of the FEMA funds being sought by the County for beach repairs due to storm events. Mr. Hendel moved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that $1 M of Reserve funds in Fund 183 be redirected to advertising for a period of one year only (the second year of the funding as previously recommended by the TDC Subcommittee). Second by Mr. HilL Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management recommended postponing a vote on the motion until the concept is analyzed by Staff and vetted by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and/or any other affected stakeholders. The Committee requested an update on the application for FEMA funds filed by the County to be potentially expended in the area of beach re-nourishment. 5 t.. .;:.B14 16 I Jly 26: 2010 Gary McAlpin noted the funds are sought due to beach damage caused by various storm events. There are 3 funding applications in process: . Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma - The requests have been approved in the amount of$IM. No funding is available as of yet, and the County is "in the queue" for the awarding of the funds. . Tropical Storm Gabrielle - Staff is addressing questions posed by the various Agencies. The request is still being reviewed by FEMA Regional Office in Atlanta. . Tropical Storm Fay - The fund request is awaiting approval by the State of Florida. Motion carried 8 'yes" -1 "no." Mr. Olesky voted "no." Commissioner Coyle stated at the Tuesday July 27,2010 BCC meeting, he will advise the BCC of the TDC recommendation approved above. He intends to introduce a motion to direct the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to review the recommendation and provide input to the BCC for their second meeting in September. The proposed re-direction of funds would be envisioned as an accelerated "short term solution" for funding advertising for FYll. In conjunction with the TDC's recommendation, he will recommend the BCC conduct a comprehensive review of the entire allocation requirements for the Tourist Development Tax. It shall be vetted by all stakeholders (Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Coastal Advisory Committee, Convention and Visitors Bureau, County Museum Staff, etc.). This would be envisioned as a "long term solution" to promote year around marketing campaigns. Discussion occurred on the ramifications of adding 1 percent to the Tourist Development Tax, with Commissioner Coyle noting it is not under consideration at this time. 2. BP Emergency Oil Spill Funding Request Jack Wert presented the Executive Summary "Update ofTDC recommendation for an emergency funding request to Governor Crist and BP" dated July 26, 2010. He noted: . The $25M awarded to the State of Florida from BP for advertising has been expended with no direct funds made available to Collier County. . Collier County was able to "piggy back" advertising with Visit Florida with a direct value to the County of$IM. . Miami-Dade, the Panhandle Counties and Lee County did receive direct funds as they applied approximately 10 days before Collier County. . It is difficult for Collier County to document revenue losses as the losses were not in the area of cancellations, rather, no tourists making reservations to visit the area. 6 I 16 I ~~21~1O . , · Staffhas re-filed a request for advertising funds directly to BP and is awaiting a decision. Mr. Hill recommended Staff develop a program to address emergencies of this nature should they occur in the future. 3. Clam Pass/Clam Bay System Modeling Program Gary McAlpin provided the Executive Summary "Recommendation for approval by the TDCfor the Clam Pass/Clam Bay system modeling program to PBS&J on a time and material, not to exceed basis of$132,517" dated July 26,2010. He noted the request for the modeling was previously approved by the Coastal Advisory Committee and the Board of County Commissioners. Staff is now moving forward with the contract for services and requesting TDC approval to expend the funds. Any funds not expended for the contract will be returned to unallocated TDC fund accounts. Mr. Sorey moved to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve expenditure of funds as outlined in the Executive Summary. Second by Mr. Hendel. Motion carried unanimously 9-0. VII. Old Business 1. Discussion of Regularly Scheduled August Meeting. Mr. Hendel moved to not hold the regularly scheduled August TDC meeting unless business warrants a meeting. Second by Ms. Becker. Carried unanimously 9-0. Break-10:34am Reconvened - 10: 40am VIII. Staff Report Presentations 1. Section I - Marketing Partners a. Tax Collections - Jack Wert b. Paradise Advertising Fran Vaccaro presented an update on marketing efforts directly related to the Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico including website, television and the Visit Florida Advertising Campaigns. c. Klages Research Report - Jack Wert d. Web site Activity - Jack Wert e. Search Engine Optimization - Jack Wert f. Fulfillment & Inquiry Summary - Jack Wert 2. Section II - Staff Department Reports Jack Wert provided the following reports: a. Director Report 7 , . 16 ,Ii B 14 July 26, 2010 b. Sales Manager Report c. P.R. Manager Report c. Film Coordinator Report d. Sports Marketing Report e. International Representatives IX. Detailed Staff Reports See attached reports submitted by Staff. X. Announcements Jack Wert noted the meeting scheduled for August 23rd will not be held unless business warrants it. The next scheduled meeting is September 27,2010. XI. Audience Input & Discussion None XII. Council Discussion Mr. Sorey reported the emergency beach re-nourishment in the area of Doctors Pass was completed with the placement of 2800 c.y. of sand obtained locally. Re-nourishment that occurred in the Seagate area was a result of "mother nature." Ms. Becker noted there are two new publications available at the Visitors Centers produced at the direction of Nancy Kearns. XIII. Next Scheduled Meeting Date/Location - August 23, 2010 - 9:00 a.m. Collier County Government Center, Administration BLDG. F, 3rd Floor, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112 (if necessary) There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 11 :23 A.M. COLLIER COUNTY TOURI DEVELOPMENT COUNCI These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as presented or as amended 8 . ~ " 16 I tl C 1 August 6, 2010 MINUTES OF THE HEARING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE Naples, Florida, August 6, 2010 RECEIVED SEP 0 8 2010 Board of County Comml6sloners fl'iala Halas Henning LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Special M~t~avini . /:, / V conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Administrative Building "F," 3rd floor, Collier County Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following persons present: SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: Honorable Brenda Garretson ALSO PRESENT: Jennifer Waldron, Code Enforcement Supervisor Kerry Adams, Code Enforcement Admi~~~' Secretary Date: 0 :: ,':'ies !o ~ 16 I 1c 1 I August 6, 2010 I. CALL TO ORDER The Honorable Special Magistrate Brenda Garretson called the Hearing to order at 9:00 AM. All those testifying at the proceeding did so under oath. A. Special Magistrate Garretson outlined the Rules and Regulations for the Hearing. The Special Magistrate noted that, prior to conducting the Hearing, Respondents were given an opportunity to speak with their Investigating Officer(s) for a Resolution by Stipulation. The goal is to obtain compliance without being punitive. RECESS: 9:17 AM RECONVENED: 9:38 AM II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Jennifer Waldron, Code Enforcement Supervisor, noted the following changes: (a) Under Item III, "Approval of the Minutes," the following Minutes were ADDED: · Intersection Safety Program Hearing Minutes for August 2, 2010 (b) Under Item IV (B), "Motion for Extension of Time," the following case was ADDED: · Case #CEAU 20090008537 - BCC vs. Anton Karaba and Eva Karabova (c) Under Item V (A), "Public Hearings," a STIPULATION was reached in the following case: . Agenda #10, Case #CESD 20090005153 - BCC vs. Luis Eduardo Venegas (d) Under Item V (B), ~~Hearings,"the following cases were WITHDRAWNby the County: · Agenda #1, Case #SO 172371 - CEEX 20100008037 - BCC vs. Timothy C. Juntunen · Agenda #5, Case #PR 044667 - CEEX 20100009901- BCC vs. Alfredo R. Salinas . Agenda #6, Case #PR 044670 - CEEX 20100009902 - BCC vs. Alfredo R. Salinas · Agenda #8, Case #DAS 12199 - CEEX 20100009666 - BCC vs. Tracy Flanigan · Agenda #9, Case #CEV 20100007074 - BCC vs. Timothy Steiner · Agenda #13, Case #CEPM 20100005355 - BCC vs. Olga Nikolakopoulos · Agenda #14, Case #CEPM 20090017757 - BCC vs. Juan Carlos Ayala & Ericka Perea · Agenda #16, Case #CESD 20090016653 - BCC vs. John Mills · Agenda #17, Case #CEV 20090017598 - BCC vs. John Mills 2 1611Cil1 August 6, 2010 (e) Under Item V (C), "Emergency Cases." the following case was ADDED: · Case #CEPM 20100009984 - BCC vs. Albert Houston, Sr. (t) Under Item VI (A), "Motionfor Imposition of Fines," the following case was WITHDRA WN by the County: · Agenda #4, Case # CEPM 20080010842 - BCC vs. Johann & Asta Marti (g) Under Item VII (B), "Motion to Rescind Previously Issued Order," the following case was ADDED from the Intersection Safety Program: · Notice #1361000094263 - BCC vs. Karyn M. Zarlenga The Special Magistrate approved the Agenda as amended, subject to changes made during the course of the Hearing at the discretion of the Special Magistrate. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - July 16,2010 and August 2, 2010 The Minutes of the Special Magistrate Hearing held on July 16,2010 were reviewed by the Special Magistrate and approved as submitted. The Minutes of the Intersection Safety Program Hearing held on August 2,2010 were reviewed by the Special Magistrate and approved as submitted. IV. MOTIONS A. Motion for Reduction/Abatement of Fines: None B. Motion for Extension of Time: Case #CEAU 20090008537 - BCC vs. Anton Karaba and Eva Karabova The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Azure Sorrels. The Respondents were not present. Violations: Collier County Land Development Code 2004-41, as amended, Section 5.03.02(A) and Florida Building Code, 2004 Edition, Chapter 1, Section 105.1 Wooden fence built on property without a valid Collier County Building Permit Folio No: 48600000705 Violation address: 12243 Fuller Lane, Naples 34113 The Special Magistrate noted Respondent, Eva Karabova, submitted a document entitled "Reaction on the Order" dated July 25,2010, and read the following. "L Eva Karabova, am askingfor more time, about 3 months, to react to your Order from the letter we received on July 16, 2010 because my husband is not home and I don't know what to do. " 3 16 , 1 C 1 August 6, 2010 The Order was entered on July 15,2010 and the Respondents were present for the initial Hearing. Investigator Sorrels stated the Respondents have not contacted her. The Special Magistrate DENIED the Respondents' Motion for an Extension of Time due to lack of legal basis. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Stipulations: 10. Case # CESD 20090005153 - BCC vs. Luis Eduardo Venee:as The Hearing was requested by Code Enforcement Investigator Carmelo Gomez who was present. The Respondent was present earlier, but left before the Case was heard. Violations: Florida Building Code, 2007 Edition, Chapter 1 Permits, Section 105.1 Conversion of garage into added living space Folio No: 36442760008 Violation address: 5043 28th Place SW, Naples A Stipulation was entered into by the Respondent on August 6, 2010. Investigator Gomez stated the Respondent agreed to the terms of the Stipulation. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to obtain all inspections and a Certificate of Completion under Demolition Permit #2010040438 on or before October 6, 2010 or a fine of $200.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. If the Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by contractor bid-out and assess the costs to the Respondent. Ifnecessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office to enforce the terms of the Stipulation. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case in the amount of $112.29 on or before September 6, 2010. The Respondent is to notify Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. Total Amount Due: $112.29 4 16 lie 1 August 6, 2010 B. Hearings: 3. Case #SO 01226 - CEEX 20100009816 - BCC vs. Mabel Mune:uia The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present. Collier County Sheriff's Office Deputy Corporal D. Christiansen was also present. Violations: Code of Law & Ord., 54-93, Section 12 Unreasonably loud music heard from roadway and by neighbor three houses away. Warned on 06/21/2009 for the same issue -large house party . Violation address: 6158 Sea Grass Lane, Naples The Respondent resides at 6158 Sea Grass Lane, Naples, Florida. A pool party was held at the Respondent's home on July 18,2010. She was advised by the Deputy that the music was too loud and was issued a "ticket." She stated she should have received a warning first as she had the previous year. She contended the music was not too loud. Cpl. Christiansen stated the complaint was made by a neighbor residing at 6130 Sea Grass Lane which is three houses away from the Respondent's property. The neighbor stated his windows were vibrating from the bass and had been constant since 2:00 PM that day. The Officer stated he heard the music and felt the vibrations as he approached the Respondent's home. The party started at 4:00 PM and the complaint was made at 9:00 PM. The Special Magistrate stated the Ordiance did not provide for "warnings" to be given before a Citation is issued. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to pay a civilfine in the amount of $100.00 plus an administrativefee of$5.00 on or before September 6,2010. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case in the amount of $50. 00 on or before September 6,2010. Total Amount Due: $155.00 7. Case #DAS 11912 - CEEX 20100007418 - BCC vs. Penelope Maroules The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present. Collier County Domestic Animal Services Officer Paul Morris was also present. Several witnesses appeared on behalf of both parties. Violations: Code of Law & Ord., 2008-51, Sec. 8-1(4) Bark, whine, howl, and cause other objectionable noise (bird) Violation address: 164 Coral Vine Drive, Naples 5 16 I 1 C J. August 6, 2010 The Respondent resides at 164 Coral Vine Drive, Naples, Florida, and received a Citation in May 2010. She stated she was on vacation when the complaints were made and asserted her birds were locked inside her house with the doors and windows closed. She further stated several DAS officers had come to her house on ten previous occasions but she was not cited for excessive or loud noise during any of their visits. Maryann Marks, the "sitter, " submitted an Affidavit describing the birds behavior while she cared for them. Other Affidavits were submitted by five neighbors attesting they were not disturbed by the birds. The Respondent cited from Section 8(h) of the Ordinance as follows: "It is unlawful for the owner of an animal to allow or permit hislher animal to bark, whine, howl, or cause other objectional noise which is offensive and of such duration of time so as to create a nuisance. " The Respondent noted the Ordinance did not define "duration of time," and requested the Citation be dismissed due to misrepresentation of the situation by the complaining party. There was never continuous noise from her birds. The Special Magistrate noted the Respondent and the County had submitted Affdavits and asked each if they would allow her to consider the Affidavits because the documents were, technically, hearsay. There was agreement. Maryann Marks appeared as a witness for the Respondent. She resides on Bayshore Drive in Naples, works with the Respondent, and cared for the birds while the Respondent was on vacation. · When she arrived at the Respondent's home, it was quiet. · The two birds "talked to her" for approximately 1 to 1 ~ hours. · She placed the birds on the lanai in order to clean their cages and stated "They may have squawked once or twice during the time I was there." Officer Morris stated the Citation was issued based upon the Affidavits received by Domestic Animal Services. He stated there were witnesses who would apprear. Daniel Wilkins appeared as a witness for the Respondent. He resides with the Respondent and stated the birds can be animated at times as "part of their nature" but the squawking was not constant or continuing. He admitted he finds screeching annoying and he and the Respondent do everything possible to control the birds. The birds are not outside after approximately 7:00 PM. The Respondent stated she has had birds at her home for the past fifteen years. She was concerned about the complaints and asked surrounding neighbors if the birds "bothered" them but no one has complained. 6 " 16 Ii 1 C 1 August 6, 2010 Officer Morris called Ilse Kastner, who resides at 163 Flame Vine Drive, as the first witness for the County. She stated she and her guests were sitting on her lanai at the end of March when she observed the white bird, screeching and "talking," had walked over to her driveway and sat there until the Respondent retrieved it. On another occasion, she was unloading groceries on a Friday evening and saw the white bird walk into her garage. The Respondent again retrieved it. Mrs. Kiastner stated it is not fair to subject everyone to the noise made by the birds who spend a great deal of time on the Respondent's lanai. She stated her property backs up to the Respondent's property. The Respondent asked Mrs. Kastner if she ever called to complain about the noise and Mrs. Kastner responded negatively. Joe Ascolese, who resides at 159 Flame Vine Drive, testifiedfor the County: · The noise has been an ongoing problem since 1998, and he has appeared before Judge Turner for the same situation. · The duration of the noise has ranged from two blasts to an hour of constant screeching at any point from 7:00 AM until dusk. · The Respondent's lanai is approximately 35 feet from Mrs. Kastner's house and his property is to the left of Mrs. Kastner. · During one event, the bird crashed into his house and laid on the grass until it was retrieved by the gentleman approximately ten minutes later. · The Respondent's birds are allowed to wander. · The screeching has been measured at 63.2 decibels - it is so loud that he cannot keep his doors or windows open. · There was a Code Enforcement ruling in 2001 and the situation became a problem again. The Respondent asked the witness if he ever called to complain about the noise. Mr. Ascolese stated he handled things through Code Enfocement and the police. Eleanor Donahoe, who resides at 167 Flame Vine Drive, testified: · Her property abuts the Respondent's property in the back. · The neighbors across the street from the front of the Respondent's house may not hear the same noise as those in the rear ofthe property. · The noise level is disturbing and annoying.. When asked by the Respondent if she had ever called, the witness stated she did call the Respondent approximately eight years earlier. Ms. Donahoe left three voice messages. When the problem continued, she knocked on the Respondent's front door but no one answered. She called Animal Control concerning the most recent incidents. Gordon Rama, who resides at 167 Flame Vine Drive, testified: · He has lived at the residence for approximately one year. · The duration has lasted longer than one hour up to an entire evening for each occurrence. · The severity of noise can be heard from one-quarter of a mile away. 7 16 11 C 1 August 6, 2010 . He is a retired automotive engineer with experience in noise abatement and estimated the decibels to be over 60 which is quite loud. The Special Magistrate noted due to the number of Affidavits to be read and considered, she would take the case under advisement and rule at a later time. The Respondent reiterated the birds are kept inside her house except for a few times when they are allowed outside with supervision. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Motion for Imposition of Fines: 6. Case #2007070651 - BCC vs. James M. Poteet The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Azure Sorrels. The Respondent was present. Violations: Collier County Ordinance 2004-58, Sec(s). 12 Allowing a dangerous and hazardous building to exist on residential property without maintenance, creating a threat to the safety and welfare of both the occupants and the general public of Collier County. Folio No: 68342680007 Violation address: 71 Isle of St. Thomas, Naples The Respondent resides at 71 Isle ofSt. Thomas, Naples, Florida. Investigator Sorrels stated the violations were abated as of April 21, 2009. Fines have accrued at the rate of$100.00 per day for the period from June 17,2008 through April 21, 2009 (309 days) for a total fine amount of $30,900.00. Previously assessed Operational Costs of$338.58 have been paid. Abatement costs incurred by the County in the amount of$4,632.50 have been paid. The total amount due to date is $30,900.00. The Investigator stated the Respondent received grants through the County's Housing and Human Services Department. She presented photographs of the Respondent's home taken in 2007 and contrasted them with the new home in which he and his family presently live. She stated the process of submitting paperwork and additional documentation was time consuming, and fines continued to accrue. The Special Magistrate DENIED the County's Motionfor Imposition of Fines. RECESS: 11:51 AM RECONVENED: 11:07 AM 8 16 1'1 lM4AUgust 6, 2010 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. Hearings: 2. Case #SO 172390 - CEEX 20100009496 - BCC vs. Michael A. Novakowski The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present. Collier County Sheriff's Office Deputy Paige Long was present. Violations: Code of Law & Ord., Sec. 130-67 Handicapped space/parked on hash marks Violation address: Wal-Mart, 11225 Tamiami Trail The Notice of Hearing was sent via Certified Mail on July 22,2010. Deputy Paige observed the Respondent's motorcycle was located between two cars which were parked in Handicapped Parking spaces. The motorcycle was parked in the hash marked (striped) area adjacent to a Handicapped Parking spot and blocked access to a car on the right, making it difficult for the vehicle's owner to use his walker. She introduced two photographs which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. The Special Magistrate ruled the Respondent was in violation. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent wasfound GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to pay a civilfine in the amount of $250.00 plus an administrativefee of$5.00 on or before September 6,2010. The Respondent was further ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case in the amount of $50.00 on or before September 6,2010. Total Amount Due: $305.00 4. Case #PR 044683 - CEEX 20100008697 - BCC vs. Paula L. Bowins The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present. Collier County Park Ranger Cinde Kavan was present. Violations: Code of Law & Ord., Sec. 130-66 Failure to display paid launch receipt Violation address: 951 Boat Ramp The Notice of Hearing was sent via Certified Mail on July 22, 2010 and delivered on July 24,2010. Park Ranger Kavan observed a vehicle that did not display a paid launch receipt at the 951 Boat Ramp and issued a Citation.. She introduced two photographs which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. 9 16 1 lC 1 August 6, 2010 Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent wasfound GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to pay a civilfine in the amount of $30.00 plus an administrativefee of $5. 00 on or before September 6, 2010. The Respondent was further ordered to pay the Operational Costs incu"ed by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case in the amount of $50. 00 on or before September 6, 2010. Total Amount Due: $85.00 C. Emergency Hearings: Case #CEPM 20100009984 - BCC vs. Albert Houston. Sr. The Hearing was requested by Code Enforcement Investigator Kitchell Snow. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances Chapter 22, Buildings and Building Regulations, Aritcle VI, Property Maintenance Code, Sections 22-231, 12(b), 12(d), 12(P), 12(c), 12(i), 12(1), and 8 VacantJabandoned unsecured structure used for prostitution and drug activity with numerous Property Maintenance Violations to include, but not limited to, leaks in the roof, exposed above-ground sewer pipes, broken windows interior and exterior walls in poor condition Folio No.: 66930160009 Violation address: 433 Carver Street, Immokalee, FL 34143 The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and Courthouse on August 5, 2010. Investigator Snow and Collier County Sheriff's Office Lt. Drew Lee investigated the site. Investigator Snow submitted several photographs which were marked as County's Composite Exhibits "B" and "C" and admitted into evidence as for the Civil case. Lt. Lee submitted 16 photographs which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence for the Criminal case. Both described a run-down building with broken windows, lacking sanitary facilities, filled with trash and bio-hazardous materials, and located in close proximity to an elementary school. The structure has been used recently for criminal activities including prostitution and drug use. Invesitgator Snow stated there was "no redeeming value in maintaining the structure." Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to obtain a Collier County Boarding Permit and board the structure on or before August 8,2010 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. 10 Cl 16 I 1 August 6,2010 The Respondent was further ordered to obtain either a Collier County Building Permit, all required inspections and a Certificate of Completion to repair the damage or a Collier County Demolition Permit, all required inspections, and a Certificate of Completion to completely remove the structure on or before August 20,2010 or ajine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. If the Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by contractor bid-out and assess the costs to the property owners. Ifnecessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case in the amount of $112.73 on or before September 6,2010. The Respondent is to notify Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator petform a site inspection to confirm compliance. Total Amount Due: $112.73 The Special Magistrate questioned the necessity to offer an option to the Respondent to board the structure. Investigator Snow stated the County would abate the violations by demolition at the end of the fourteen-day period. B. Hearings: 11. Case #CEPM 20100002536- BCC vs. Chad A. & Crvstal M. Shannon The Hearing was requested by Code Enforcement Investigator James Kincaid who was present. The Respondents were not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22, Article VI, Section 22-231 (15) Pool in back yard with green stagnate water. Folio No: 25117600268 Violation address: 6654 Castlelawn Place, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and Courthouse on July 19,2010. Investigator Kincaid introduced two photographs taken on February 25, 2010 which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and two photographs taken on August 5, 2010 which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "B" and both were admitted into evidence. 11 16 I 1 C L.ugust6, 2010 Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to either: (1) chemically treat the pool water to kill the algae and provide bi-weekly treatments to maintain clean pool water on or before the close of business on August 9,2010 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate; -OR- (2) chemically treat the pool water and cover the pool to prevent the intrusion of rain water, pursuant to HUD standards, on or before the close of business on August 9,2010 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. If the Respondents have not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by contractor bid-out and assess the costs to the property owners. Ifnecessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case in the amount of $112.20 on or before September 6,2010. The Respondents are to notify Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. Total Amount Due: $112.20 12. Case #CEROW 20090019407 - BCC vs. Matthew J. Rvan The Hearing was requested by Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan Musse who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 110, Roads and Bridges, Article II Construction in Right of Way, Division 1 Generally, Section 1l0-31(a) Permit #20924-E for a "replace culvert and driveway" expired on 10-31- 2004 without obtaining all inspections and approval. Folio No: 62841200007 Violation address: 569 104th Ave N, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and Courthouse on July 19, 2010. Investigator Musse introduced a copy of Permit #20924-E which was marked as County's Exhibit "A" and two photographs which were marked as County's Composite Exhitib "B" and admitted into evidence. 12 16 1 t 1 ~ August 6, 2010 He noted the property was vacant and in the foreclosure process. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to obtain a Collier County Right-of- Way Permit, all required inspections, and a Certificate of Completion on or before September 6,2010 or afine of $100. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. If the Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by contractor bid-out and assess the costs to the property owner(s). Ifnecessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case in the amount of $112.29 on or before September 6,2010. The Respondent is to notify Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. Total Amount Due: $112.29 15. Case #CEPM 20100002802 - BCC vs. Gabriela Guzman The Hearing was requested by Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joseph Mucha who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22, Article VI, Section 22-231, Subsections 1,9, 12b, 121, 120, 12p, 19, and 20 Vacant mobile home with several property maintenance violations. Folio No: 00765000002 Violation address: 17034 Lockhart Drive, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and Courthouse on July 21, 2010. Investigator Mucha introduced 31 photographs taken on February 17,2010 which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. He stated seven individuals were living in the structure and five were unrelated. The owner's brother stated he would demolish the mobile home in March but the violations remain. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to hire a licensed General Contractor to obtain all required Permits, inspections, and a Certificate of Occupancy or Completion to either repair the violations cited in the Property Maintenance Inspection Report or to demolish the structure on or before September 6,2010 or a 13 16 , 1 Cl August 6, 2010 fine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. If the Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by contractor bid-out and assess the costs to the property owner(s). If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case in the amount of $112.82 on or before September 6,2010. The Respondent is to notify Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. Total Amount Due: $112.82 RECESS: 12:00 PM RECONVENED: 12:10 PM 18. Case #CEPM 20090012924 - BCC vs. Mary & Damiano Bavaro The Hearing was requested by Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Cristina Perez who was present on behalf of Investigator Patrick Baldwin. The Respondents were not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinance, Chapter 22, Article VI, Section 22-231 (15), Swimming pool water is black, filled with algae and stagnating. Folio No: 69060108488 Violation address: 14131 Fall Creek Ct, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and Courthouse on July 27, 2010. Supervisor Perez stated the owners moved out of state, and the property is vacant. She introduced two photographs taken on August 7, 2009 and August 5, 2010 by Investigator Patrick Baldwin. The photographs were marked as County's Exhibits "A" and "B" and were admitted into evidence. The violation has not been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to either: (1) chemically treat the pool water to kill the algae and provide bi-weekly treatments to maintain clean pool water on or before the close of business on August 9,2010 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate; 14 16 ~. 1 C 1 August 6, 20 I 0 -OR- (2) chemically treat the pool water and cover the pool to prevent the intrusion of rain water, pursuant to HUD standards, on or before the close of business on August 9,2010 or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. If the Respondents have not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by contractor bid-out and assess the costs to the property owners. Ifnecessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case in the amount of $112.38 on or before September 6,2010. The Respondents are to notify Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator petform a site inspection to confirm compliance. Total Amount Due: $112.38 VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Motion for Imposition of Fines: 1. Case #CENA 20090005196 - BeC vs. Steven F. Camacho The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Michele McGonagle. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws, Chapter 54, Article VI, Sections 54-181 and 54-179. Litter consisting of but not limited to: broken furniture, appliances, buckets, piles of wood and aluminum, rope, coolers, paint, tools, and a wooden boat filled with vegetation debris scattered throughout front, side, and rear yards. Folio No: 66680480000 Violation Address: 217 Goodland Drive East, Naples The Notice of Hearing was sent via Certified Mail on July 23,2010 and delivered on July 29,2010. The property and Courthouse were posted on July 19,2010. Investigator McGonagle stated the violations have not been abated. Fines have accrued at the rate of$50.00 per day for the period from July 8, 2010 through August 6, 2010 (30 days) for a total fine amount of$I,500.00. Previously assessed Operational Costs of$112.38 have not been paid. The total amount due to date is $1,612.38. 15 16 j j:C 1 August 6, 2010 The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for Imposition of Fines in the total amount of $1,612.38 and notedfines continue to accrue. 2. Case #CENA 20090007984 - BCC vs. Julian H. Camacho The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Michele McGonagle. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws, Chapter 54, Article VI, Section 54-181 and Section 54-179. Litter consisting of but not limited to: buckets, spa, coolers, broken furniture, piles of wood and metal, appliances, vegetation debris, paint, tools, tires, and other debris scattered throughout vacant lot. Folio No: 66680280006 Violation address: 338 Pettit Drive, Goodland The Notice of Hearing was sent via Certified Mail on July 23, 2010 and delivered on July 29,2010. The property and Courthouse were posted on July 19,2010. Investigator McGonagle stated the violations have not been abated. Fines have accrued at the rate of$50.00 per day for the period from July 8, 2010 through August 6,2010 (30 days) for a total fine amount of$1,500.00. Previously assessed Operational Costs of$112.38 have not been paid. The total amount due to date is $1,612.38. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motionfor Imposition of Fines in the total amount of $1,612.38 and notedfines continue to accrue. 3. Case #CEV 20090007995 - BCC vs. Julian H. Camacho The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Michele McGonagle. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Land Development Code 2004-41, as amended, Section 2.01.00(A). Several types of trailers and recreational camper located on property are unlicensed and/or inoperable. Folio No: 66680280006 Violation Address: 338 Pettit Drive, Goodland The Notice of Hearing was sent via Certified Mail on July 23,2010 and delivered on July 29, 2010. The property and Courthouse were posted on July 19,2010. Investigator McGonagle stated the violations have not been abated. 16 ,. 16 , f 1 ; August 6, 2010 Fines have accrued at the rate of $50.00 per day for the period from July 8, 2010 through August 6, 2010 (30 days) for a total fine amount of$I,500.00. Previously assessed Operational Costs of$112.38 have not been paid. The total amount due to date is $1,612.38. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motionfor Imposition of Fines in the total amount of $1,612.38 and noted fines continue to accrue. 5. Case #CEV 20100002334 - BCC vs. Robert Hoover Rev Trust The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Carol Sykora. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Ordinance(s) 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code; Section 2.01.00(A). Recurring Violation: Unlicensed/inoperable vehicles stored outside on Estates zoned property. Folio No: 37348360006 Violation address: 1280 25th St SW, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and Courthouse on July 22,2010. Investigator Sykora stated the violations have not been abated. The Respondent claimed he owned only one vehicle, but the Investigator saw several vehicles on the property and noted the vehicles were still unlicensed.. Fines have accrued at the rate of $100.00 per day for the period from May 22, 2010 through July 16,2010 (55 days) for a total fine amount of $5,500.00. Fines were stayed from July 16,2010 through August 6, 2010. Previously assessed Operational Costs of$112.64 have not been paid. The total amount due to date is $5,612.64. The Special Magistrate ruled thefines had been stayedfor the purpose of allowing the Respondent to comply. Since he did not, she assessed fines for the period from July 16, 2010 through August 6, 2010 (20 days) in the amount of $2,000.00. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motionfor Imposition of Fines in the total amount of $ 7,612. 64 and notedfines continue to accrue. VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Motion to Amend Previously Issued Order: None B. Motion to Rescind Previously Issued Order: 17 .. . 16 I 1 C Jgust 6, 2010 (from Intersection Safety Program Hearing) Notice #1361000094263 - BCC vs. Karvn M. Zarlenl!:a The County was represented by Code Enforcement Supervisor Jennifer Waldron. The Respondent was not present. Supervisor Waldron stated the County requested to rescind the Order due to a mis- communication between American Traffic Solutions and the Respondent. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion. VIII. CONSENT AGENDA A. Request to Forward Cases to County Attorney's Office as referenced in the submitted Executive Summary. The Special Magistrate reviewed the cases cited in the Executive Summary and GRANTED the County's Request, B. Request for Special Magistrate to Impose Nuisance Abatement Liens on Cases referenced in the submitted Executive Summary. The Special Magistrate reviewed the cases cited in the Executive Summary and GRANTED the County's Request. IX. REPORTS None X. NEXT HEARING DATE September 3,2010 at 9:00 AM, located at the Collier County Government Center, Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. There being no further business for the good of the County, the Hearing was adjourned by Order of the Special Magistrate at 12:34 PM. 18 .. III. . 16 I 1 C 1 August6,2010 COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING The Minutes 77 approved by the Special Magistrate on ~'ce:r 3, )010 , as presented , or as amended . 19 i D:~mJI\Y1];fii\ At SEP 2 7 2010 IYJ 161'lC2 ~ BY: ......................... 5 W F . II .:4~.~~S~u'~we~~",~~'!r:;~~H.'!'!J!~'!~1 Pltl~~!'!~ ,~~ncil iD&oo C,' 11H~~. fIrl_;;;;~i:;;;. l~i..;;:.25~:.;;.-~~ ~ ,... a IYl 47_____ ,., ?'';O ~ . ~ n~ ~ N on g W ~t.;} -1<- n ""0 ~ I" o :s . I C ..,,0 ,. W r- ... .. CJ ... _ :;0 .... r 6N :::- jJ '!It September 22, 2010 Mr. Dwight Brock County Clerk Collier County 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 RE: Annual Budget for FY 2010/2011 Dear Mr. Brock: Enclosed is a copy of our adopted Annual Budget for FY 2010/2011. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Janice YeJJ, Finance Administrative Manager, at (239) 338-2550, Ext. 237. Sincerely, SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL j[)~~624D Deborah Kooi Senior Administrative Assistant /dk Enclosure --,~3 :0. 16 1'1 Ct2 FOR A CERTIFIED COPY: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEE On this 22nd day of September, 2010, I attest that the attached document is a true, exact, complete, and unaltered photocopy made by me, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, Records Management Liaison Officer, of the "Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 201O-2011Budget," as adopted by the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council on May 20,2010. This document is a public record, and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council is its official source. J' -'~- // ~, ~ // /';': f '/ /,t:; -,--- ~~~:vM~- NfChole Gwinnett Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Records Management Liaison Officer 16 j 1 C 2 ANNUALBUDGETCONTENTS' Pages Sources of Revenue 1 Proposed Budget for the upcoming fiscal year only 2 Comparsion of fiscal years - for RPC, MPO, NEP, and Combined: 3 to 7 3 prior years actual. YTD and adopted current budget, proposed budget Proposed Budget and Five Year Plan 8 Adopted current budget, proposed budget as part of a five year plan Facts to be noted for this Annual Budget includes: 9 Pertinent notes, ReselVed FB status, and a comparsion of fringe and indirect rates for the purposed, current, and past 4 years. Graphs: 10 Pie Chart to reflect distribution/percentage of the 3 main entities Pie Chart to reflect distribution of revenue Chart reflecting expenses in the comparsion of ActuallYTD/Budgeted Capital Assets Policy 11 Capital Asset Disposal - Computer Disposal Policy 12 ReselVe Policy 13 Calculation of the Indirect/Fringe Rates Policy 14 16 11 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PlANNING COUNCIL REVENUE SOURCES October 1, 2010 thro h Se Iember 30 2011 GENERAl REVENUES INTEREST/MISC ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL REVENUES 30.000 FED/STATE/OTHER 466,669 DRls/NOPCs 496,669 3,005.931 200,000 3,205,931 TOTAL REVENUES 3,702,800 Prior V..r Fund Balance 855,715 MEMBER POPULATION ASSESSMENT 49,~.50 99,909.60 u __ }.~~~.30 ____ ,_-1?,396.QO__ 184,537.20 116796.00 466,668.60 Charlolte . oilier Glades ~___ 165,45?.. ________ ___ 333,03.L__ _~__ _, ,___.1.!,311 ______ __"______-4.!,~~.,._ __ m 615,124 389 320 1,555562 He~____ Lee.. .'. __ ___ Sarasota TOTAL ASSESSMENTS INTEREST AND MISC. TOTAL GENERAL REVENUES 1 555 562 30 000.00 496 668.60 I SPECIAl REVENUES I FEDERAUSTATE DRI OTHER TOTAL I~~;I~::::'L ---~ i ~::-- -..- -~t-..-.----~ - 2::: IIHME~lSaGlDlSASTER PROGS. ~-=_=~ 52,~ ~ L. _~:... -r: __~,OOO. _ __--.12,546 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1____56.ooo~___. _ 20.000 76,000 ~R(saiMarsh1Mlsc.G'~~) I~ 1:::-'- -- -~t-~~~38- _H 2:::~-- FEDERAUST A TEIOTHER 611.455 116,738 n8,193 I DR..iNoPcs - - 200,000 200,000 I RPC SPECIAl.. REVENUES 611,455 200,000 116,738 928,193 IIMPO IcHNEP 1,026,000 800,000 , _~-,038_ 383,700 1,114,038 1,163,700 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUES 2.439455 200.000 561.476 3 _,131 . Assessments based upon official Bureau of Business and Economic Research population estimates. Assessments are estimated at 30 cents/capita as provided for in the Councirs Interlocal Agreement, adopted November 8,1973. C~2 1611 ,.~2 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PlANNING COUNCIL PROPOSED BUDGET OCTOBER 1, 2010 TO SEPTEMBER 30,2011 ExDendilunls QD!;t Salaries 650,000 480,000 1,130,000 280,000 296,000 1,708,000 FICA 130,000 130,000 130,000 Retirement 181,300 181,300 111,300 Health Insurance 180,000 110,000 180,000 Workers CompNnemployment 10,000 10,000 10,000 ConaultantFees 16,000 24,000 40,000 0 40,000 NEP Contractual 0 0 174,000 174,000 MPO Contractu8l 0 0 452,000 452,000 Audit Fees 47,000 47,000 47,000 Travel 14,000 34,000 48,000 6,000 21,000 75,000 Telephone 6,900 200 7,100 1,000 650 1,7&0 Postage 1,600 1,500 3,000 5,000 20,000 28,000 Equipment Rental 32,000 32,000 200 32,200 In surance 33,200 33,200 33,2C1O RepalrlMalnl (GroundslBldglEqulp) 25,000 25,000 25,000 PrintinglReproduction 1,000 1,000 2,000 6,500 85,000 93,500 Utilities (EIec. water, garb) 28,000 28.000 21,000 Advertising 1,100 1,400 2,_ 10,000 550 13,0&0 Other MisceIleanous 1,500 1,000 2,600 500 1,500 4,_ Office Supplies 12,000 3,000 15,000 2,000 1,500 18,_ Computer Related Expenses 27,000 3,000 30,000 3.000 6,000 31,000 Publications 1,800 1,800 1,500 500 3.100 Professional Development 16,000 9,000 25,000 2,000 7,000 34,000 MeetlngsfEvenls 7,000 3,000 10,000 2,000 43,800 515,800 Capital Outlay-Operations 12,000 3,000 15,000 6.000 4,000 25,000 Capital Outlay-BuDding 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 Long Term Debt 0 128,000 128,000 121,000 Allocation of Fringellncllrect** ; -1,236,538 525,000 -711,538 336,538 375,000 0 i Reserve for Operations Expense. 655,716 855 718 855.716 Tolal Cash Outlays 853,478 1,227,100 2.010 578 1,114,038 1,036,700 4,231,318 Non-Cuh ExDense: Deprec:l8t1on 70,000 70,000 70,000 Total ExDenaes 923,478 1,227,100 2,180 578 1,114,038 1,036,700 4,301.311 OSee nole .2 - As per the Auditors, the Fund Balance must be shown as 'cany over fund balanca' in the revenue portion and as 'reserve for operations' in the expense portion of the budget. ..s.. nota t4 - The Indirect rate prorates the overhead expenses incurred by the RPC over each active project/agency. This is accomplished by a reallocation of the expenses from General to Special Revenue. These expenses include, but art! not tlmlted to. facility costs, offICe supplies, and support staff. 2 16 I 1 Ge SWFRPC-MPO-CHNEP COMBINED OCT. 1,2010 - Sept. 30, 2011 BUDGET ..................................... .....X~.!E..~~........ ...........,...................... Current Amended Propo$ed Actual Actual Actual YTD Budget Budget VIE VIE VIE ACTUAL VIE YIE 9130107 9/30108 9/30109 at 3/31/10 9130/10 fl3Gff1 Revenues Assessments 431,470 450,432 464,696 235,276 470,662 4ee,'" Federal/State/Local Grants 2,743,287 2,528,329 2,820,471 1,223,934 2,600,827 2,17',131 DrilMonitoring Fees 356,254 423,587 299,605 209,729 200,000 ZOO,OOO Interest/Mise 44,308 37,625 15,104 5,972 30,000 30,000 Carry OVer Fund Balance 392,967 565,843 637,988 637 918 e5 718 Total Income 3,968,286 4,005816 4,237,864 1,874 910 3 838 11 4 231 318 nditures Qirm. Salaries - Direct 1,286,787 1,358,512 1,439,337 860,721 1,421,tOO Salaries - Release TlIlle 27Q,~ _~62,125 ___ __~76!105 .1j5,963 27e 100 Salaries - Total 1,557,149 1,620,636 1,715,442 808,883 1,7"',000 FICA 115,139 121,301 129,994 59,052 136,OOD Retirement 160,037 165,357 181,381 67,108 111,300 Health Insurance 166,521 171,950 177,977 97,242 110.000 Workers Comp/Unemployment 7,950 7,247 6,118 8,394 10,000 Consultant Fees 58,825 59,109 125,707 15,901 40,000 NEP Contractual 515,184 380,741 442,497 100,214 174,000 MPO Contractual 208,969 144,238 173,192 107,818 452,000 Audit Fees 39,000 49,039 45,686 43,116 47,000 Travel 51,074 45,866 46,859 23,755 75,000 Telephone 11,858 9,855 8,192 4,740 ',750 Postage 21,092 26,175 37,477 14,455 21,000 Storage Unit Rental 2,242 2,266 2,912 224 Equipment Rental 34,900 31,602 21,585 18,393 32,ZOO Insurance 33,093 31,056 29,480 21,564 33,ZOO RepairlMalnt. (GroundslBldg/Equip) 19,972 24,925 24,631 8,203 21,000 Printing/Reproduction 41,152 93,275 61,147 43,964 '3,1OtI Ublities (Elec, water, garb) 24,424 23,053 26,089 9,150 21,000 Advertising 6,940 13,893 13,350 7,014 13,. Other Miscelleanous 1,044 1,735 3,403 1,837 4,600 Office Supplies 23,283 27,367 19,654 9,48tJ 1I,1OtI Computer Related Expenses 39,575 52,880 61,809 14,782 31,000 Publications 2,589 2,302 1,625 702 3,_ Professional Development 34,542 45,665 36,137 31,893 34,000 MeetingslEvents 44,739 39,242 44,679 15,853 ,,"'00 Capital OuUay-Operations 31,470 41,853 12,175 3,770 21,000 Capital OuUay-Buildlng 21,742 7,450 5,200 0 10,000 Long Term Debt (Bulkling Loan) 127,751 127,751 127,751 83,878 121,000 Allocation of FringelJndirect 0 , Reserve for Operations Expense 392,967 565,843 637 988 0 718 Total Cash Outlays 3 795,223 3,933671 4,220,136 1 595 147 4 231 31. Net Income/(Loss) 173 063 72 145 17728 79 783 Non-Cash ExDenses' Depreciation 61,653 61 653 71 028 Total Expenses 3,856 876 3 995 324 4,291 164 1 595 147 3 Revenues Assessments FederallState/local Grants DrtlMonitortng Fees InteresVMisc Carry Over Fund Balance Total Income Ex nditures ~ Salaries - Direct Salaries - Release Time Salaries . T olaf FICA Retirement Health Insurance Workers ComplUnemployment Consultant Fees NEP Contractual MPO Contractual Audit Fees Travel Telephone Postage Storage Unit Rental Equipment Rental Inswance RepalrlMaint (GroundsIBIdg/Equlp) PrintinglReproductlon Utilities (E\ec, water, garb) Ising Other Miscelleanous Office Supplies Computer Related Expenses Pubfications Professional Development MeetingslEvents Capital Outtay-Operations Capital Outlay-Building Long Term Debt (Building Loan) Allocation of Fringe/Indirect Reserve for Operations Expense Total Cash Outlays Net Income/(Loss) Non-Cash Exoenses: Depreciation Total Expenses 1611 C?, SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL OCT, 1,2010 - Sept. 30, 2011 BUDGET ._..__.___.. ._..r~!!!.,P_':I.!!,_. .__.....,.._........... Current Amended RPC Actual RPC Actual RPC YTD RPC Budget VIE VIE ACTUAL VIE 9130108 9130109 at 3/31/10 9130110 RPC Actual VIE 9130107 431,470 733,606 356,254 44,308 392,967 1,958,605 865,799 187,174 1,052,973 115,139 160,037 166,521 7,950 58,825 o o 39,000 24,213 8,884 12,604 1,492 34,900 33,093 19,972 1,252 24,424 836 1,044 15,534 34,348 1,419 28,143 13,094 12,939 21,742 127,751 -625,554 392 967 1 785,727 172 878 68 421 450,432 698,361 423,587 37,625 565,843 2 175 848 954,034 181,471 1,135,505 121,301 165,357 171,950 7,247 59,109 o o 49,039 27,075 8,455 1,453 1,376 31,602 31,056 24,925 8,080 23,053 1,603 1,285 20,861 50,649 1,871 38,465 10,612 41,853 7,450 127,751 -631,128 565 843 2 103 703 72,145 68 769 464,696 820,549 299,605 15,104 637,988 2237,942 993,159 191,150 1,184,309 129,994 181,381 171,971 6,118 125,707 o o 45,686 26,173 7,068 -711 1,573 21,455 29,480 24,631 -626 26,089 4,588 3,325 14,349 57,994 1,562 29,779 19,202 10,897 5,200 127,751 -678,723 637 988 2220,214 17,728 71 028 235,276 419,037 209,729 5.972 o 870014 486,663 " _121, 051, 587,714 59,052 67,108 97,242 6,394 15,901 o o 43,116 13,203 4,144 1,582 121 16,393 21,013 8,203 167 9,150 1,750 1,837 7,242 14,732 6n 24,275 4,446 1,228 o 63,876 -280,314 790 250 79763 1938 838,582 _1~~11,~0 1,027,66 122,0 168,0 180,000 20.879 1 938 8SI o PropoHd RPC Budget VIE 9130111 4"'''' 7ZI,193 200,000 30,000 855 711 010 57. 931,100 .... .111,100 1,130,000 130,000 111,300 110,000 10,000 40,000 47,000 41,000 7,100 3,000 3%,000 33,200 25,000 2.000 21,000 2,fOO Z,600 15,000 30,000 1,100 2:5,000 10,000 15,000 10.000 '.000 -711,131 71. 57. o 1 837495 2,172 472 2291,242 790,250 TraWllIa higher dUll 10 faCt \haI_eral "'_ aRl requlrlng clauelfconfe,llllC* . ~tl. irwoIWd 4 16 , 1 C2 METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION OCT. 1,2010 - Sept. 30, 2011 BUDGET ................................ .......r.!'.~..~~....... .........,....._................ Current Amended MPO MPO MPO MPO YTD MPO Actual VIE Actual VIE Actual VIE ACTUAL Budget VIE 9/30/07 9130/08 9/30109 at 3/31/10 9130/10 PropoHd IIPO Budget YIE 9130/11 Revenues Assessments FederallStalelLocal Grants DriIMonitoring Fees InlefesVMlsc Carry Over Fund Balance Total Income 708,808 734,313 737,699 370,426 936,81 1,114,031 708,808 734,313 737,699 370,426 938 81 EXDendltures Qmt Salaries - Direct 165,775 200,598 195,478 86,941 257,500 237,1SOO Salaries - Release Time ----.- 41,594 .... 40,327 42.478 22,~~ 4~.t!!!:!! 42,500 Salaries .. Total 207,369 240,924 237,956 109,397 300,000 m,ooo RCA 0 0 0 0 G Retirement 0 0 0 0 G Health Insurance 0 0 0 0 G Workers Comp/Unemployment 0 0 0 0 C Consultant Fees 0 0 0 0 G NEP Contractual 0 0 0 0 C MPO Contractual 208,969 144,238 173,192 107,818 222,317 412,000 Audit Fees 0 0 0 0 0 Travel 6,954 3,394 4,143 1,784 8,000 1,0tI0 Telephone 2,316 856 752 378 3,00Cl 1,000 Postage 1,114 4,814 4,913 1,750 5,000 S,OOO Storage Unit Rental 0 0 0 0 C Equipment Rental 0 0 0 0 0 Insurance 0 0 0 0 C RepairlMaint. (Grounds/BIdglEquip) 0 0 0 0 C Printing/Reproduction 5,807 3,783 1,336 291 8,500 1,500 Utilities (EIec, water, garb) 0 0 0 0 0 Advertising 5,845 11,768 8,696 5,264 10,000 1D,000 Other Miscelleanous 0 447 28 0 500 500 Office Supplies 4,660 2,367 563 234 5,000 2,000 Computer Related Expenses 115 516 788 0 2,000 3,000 PubIlcations 985 0 0 0 1,500 1,1SOO Professional Development 350 1,012 523 1,093 2,000 2,000 Meetings/Events 357 443 730 ..125 2,000 2,000 Capital Outlay-Operations 6,673 0 0 2,542 3,000 ',000 Capital Outlay-Building 0 0 0 0 G Long Term Debt (Building Loan) 0 0 0 0 0 Allocation of Frlnge/lndlrect 257,292 319,750 304,078 140,001 365,_ 33',831 Reserve for Operations Expense Total Cash OuUays 708 808 734,313 737 699 370 426 938 812 1114.031 Net Incomel(Loss) 0 Non-Cash Exoenses: Depreciation Total Expenses 708 808 734 313 737 699 370426 938,812 1114.031 5 16 J 1 ~2 CHARLOTTE HARBOR NEP OCT. 1, 2010 - Sept. 30, 2011 BUDGET .,......._._........._.,._ _.._Y.~!.~.E!:lf__ ,.....__..._........_...... Current Amended CHNEP - CHNEP.. CHNEP - NEP YTD CHNEP - Actual Actual Actual ACTUAL Budget VIE 9/30107 VIE 9130/08 VIE 9130109 a/3I31/10 VIE 9/30110 Propoaed CHNEp. Budget Y/E I13Wf1 Revenues Assessments FederallSlatelLocal Grants DrilMonitoring Fees InteresVM"1SC Carry OYer Fund Balance ToIallncome 1,300,873 1,095,655 1,262,223 434,471 963,700 1,031,700 1,300,873 1,095,655 1,262,223 434,471 9637 1 038 700 EXD8lldltures Qitm Salanes - Direct 255,212 203,880 250,700 87,117 307,600 253,800 Salaries - Release Time ~94 _ , _ _u~Q,32~ ' 42,478 ~~_ ~2, 456 _ 42,600 _~'DO ---. Salaries.. T olal 296,807 244,207 293,178 109,573 360,OOCI 298,000 FICA 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retirement 0 0 0 0 C 0 Health Insurance 0 0 0 0 0 0 Workers ComplUnemptoyment 0 0 0 0 C 0 Consultant Fees 0 0 0 0 C 0 NEP Contractual 515,184 380,741 442,497 100,214 121,2I5C 17 ",(J(J(J MPO Contractual 0 0 0 0 0 0 Audit Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 T ravet 19,907 15,397 16,543 8,768 15,OOC 21,000 Telephone 658 544 372 218 70C fJ50 Postage 7,374 19,908 33,275 11,123 2O,OOC 20,000 Storage Unit Rental 750 890 1,339 103 103 Equipment Rental 0 0 130 0 200 200 Insurance 0 0 0 551 887 0 RepairlMaint. (GroundslBldglEqulp) 0 0 0 0 0 0 PrintingnRepfoducUon 34,093 81,412 60,436 43,506 10,000 16,000 Uti6ties (EIec, water, garb) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Advertising 259 521 66 0 5SO 150 Other Miscelleanous 0 3 50 0 100 1,1ltJO OffIce Supplies 3,090 4,139 4,742 1,990 3,000 1,100 Computer Related Expenses 5,112 1,714 3,028 30 4,000 ',000 Publications 184 425 63 25 600 fIOO Professional Development 6,049 6,188 5,835 6,526 7,000 7,000 MeetlngslEvents 31,287 28,187 24,747 11,532 30,000 43,100 Capital Outlay.()perations 11,857 0 1,278 0 15,000 4,(J(J(J Capital Outlay-Building 0 0 0 0 0 0 long Term Debt (Building loan) 0 0 0 0 AHocatIon of FringeJlndirect 368,261 311,378 374,645 140,313 336,000 375,000 Reserve for Operations Expense Total Cash Outlays 1 300 873 1 095 655 1,262,223 434,471 983,700 1.03f..700 Net Incomel(loss) 0 Non-Cash Exoenses: Depreciation Total Expenses 1,300,873 1 095 655 1 262,223 434 471 983.700 1.03'.700 6 16 J 1C 2' SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL Comparison of RPC '09 Actual to Budgets of 2010 and 2011 Percentage Percentage PercerUge Amended RPC ProposedRPC change change change RPC Actull Budget Budget '09 Act to '09 Act to '10 Bud to Y IE 9{30/09 Y/E 9/30/10 Y/E 9/30/11 '10 Bud '11 Bud '11 Bud Revenue. Assessments 464,696 470,552 466,669 ---- ~~ ~-~------- --- .-----+----.--- -.---- ------- .- .-- ---.-- f--- -- --- FederaVStateILocal Grants 620,549 600,115 128,193 Future a,-"~!:,_~,-"ent (DCA 95,000 -- -.- DrIIM()~lto~i~_Fees .__ 299,605 200,000 200,000 - --,- InteresVMisc 15,104 30,000 30,000 f--. --.-- - --------- .- .--.- -- f---~ .-- ---- - --- Carry Over Fund Balance 637,988 637,98~ 655,116 Future amendment (FB 17,726 Total Income 2.237 942 2 061.383 2.0IQ.578 -6.34% -7.03% 1.42% Expenditure. Personnel Salaries 1,184,309 1 ,027,662 1,130,000 FICA 129.994 122,000 130,000 Retirement 181,381 166,000 181,300 Heahh Insurance 177,977 180,000 180,000 Workers ComplUnemployment 6,116 20,879 10,000 Future amendment 80,000 Total Personnel Services 1.179,778 1,586,641 1.831,300 -4.96% -2.89% 2.18% Operating Expenses 540.436 422,114 449,218 Future amendment (selVer' 15,000 Future amendment (FB) 17,728 Total Ooeratino Exoenses 640 436 oM4.842 449,278 -15.84% -16.87% -1.22% Total Cash Outlays 2,220,214 2,051,38~ 2,080,578 -7.60% -6.29% 1.42% A B C Avs.B Avs.C Bvs.C Net lnc:omel(Loaa) 17,7281 01 01 7 16 11 C 2 Adopted 5 Year Plan Budget Budget Budget Plan Budget Plan Budget Plan BUdget Plan VIE VIE VIE VIE VIE VIE 9130110 9/30111 9130112 9130113 9/30114 9130115 Revenues Assessmenls 470,552 488,_ 485,335 504,749 524,939 545,936 Federal/State/Local Grants 2,500,627 2,878,931 2,556,770 2,617,284 2,690,792 2,742,293 DrIIMonitoring Fees 200,000 200,000 215,000 215,000 250,000 250,000 InteresUMlsc 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Carry Over-Fund Balance 637,988 855718 656,000 656,000 656 000 656 000 T otallncome 3,839.167 4,231 318 3,943105 4023,033 4,151,731 4,224229 SWFRPC-MPO-CHNEP COMBINED PROPOSED BUDGET AND FIVE YEAR PLAN OCTOBER 1 2010 TO SEPTEMBER 30 2015 xper urea Qi!m; Salaries 1,677,662 1,708,000 1,748,760 1,792,678 1,837,787 1,884,122 FICA 122,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 132,000 132,000 Retirement 166,000 181,300 185,000 185,000 190,000 190,000 Health Insurance 180.000 180,000 200,000 210,000 220,000 225,000 Workers ComplUnemployment 20.879 10,000 10,000 10,000 10.000 10,000 Consultant Fees 40.000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 NEP Contractual 121,250 174,000 180,284 186,553 193,621 199,331 MPO Contractual 222,317 452,000 101,410 101,039 101.896 101,012 Audit Fees 47,000 47,000 48,000 48,000 49,000 49,000 Travel 48,000 75,000 53,000 53,000 56.000 56,000 Telephone 12.700 8,750 8,700 6,800 9,800 9,800 Postage 29,000 28,000 31,000 32,000 33,000 34,000 Storage Unit Rental 224 0 0 0 0 0 Equipment Rental 35,200 32,200 32,000 33.000 34,000 35,000 Insurance 34,097 33,200 33.200 33,200 35,200 35,200 RepalrlMainl. (GroundsIBldglEquip) 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,500 26,000 26,500 PrinllnglReproductlon 70.500 93,500 57.000 58,000 58,500 59,000 Utlllties (Elec, water, garb) 25,000 28,000 28.000 30,000 32,000 34,000 Advertising 12,850 13,050 13,700 13,700 14,250 14,250 Other Miscelleanous 3,500 4.500 3,500 3,500 3,550 3,550 OffIce Supplies 23,000 18,500 22,000 24,000 24.000 25,000 Computer Related Expenses 38,000 39,000 37,500 37,700 41,000 41,000 Publications 4,000 3,800 8,600 6,600 8.100 8,100 Professional Development 39.000 34,000 39,000 41,100 41,800 44,600 MeetlngslEvenls 44,000 55,_ 53,000 53.000 55,000 56,000 Capital Outlay-Operations 27,000 25,000 28,000 48,000 43,500 43,500 Capital Outlay-Building 10,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Long Term Debt (Building Loan) 128.000 128,000 128,000 128,000 128,000 128,000 Allocation of Fringe/Indirect Reserve for Operations Expense 637,988 855 718 656,000 656.000 656.000 656 000 Total Cash Outlays 3839,167 4231318 3,918.654 4,008.370 4,093,804 4 159,965 Net IncomeI(Loss) Non-Cash Exoenses: Depreciation 60,000 70 000 70.000 71,000 71,000 72 000 Total Expenses 3,899.167 4,301 318 3.988,654 4,079,370 4,164,804 4231,965 E ndit 8 16 11 C 2 Facts to be noted for this Annual Budaet 1 Included in Employee Benefits Salaries are sick, vacation, and holiday pay, Provision is also included for adjustments (ie: merit increase, reclass, etc,) In the event of any adjustments, transfers can be made to the corresponding project within the same expense line, As always, transfers between Expense Lines will require a Budget Amendment. 2 As per the Auditors, the Fund Balance must be shown in the Budget as 'carry over fund balance' in the revenue portion and as 'reserve for operations' in the expense portion of the Budget. 3 It has been recommended by the auditors that the Council designate a portion of the fund balance for emergencies, In that regard, $644,000 was been appropriated thus far and the reserved fund balance will be increased each year until our goal of a six month reserve is met. 4 Fringe and Indirect reimbursed by MPO and NEP grants are shown as reallocation from Council since their budgets are separated from the RPC budget. A copy of the Calculation of the Indirect/Fringe Rates policy approved by the Council is attached, The Indirect rate prorates the overhead incurred by the RPC over each active project/agency, These expenses include, but are not limited to, facility costs, office supplies, and support staff. FrinaeJlndirect Rates for 5 years: 2010-11 Fringe Provisional Rate 2010-11 Indirect Provisional Rate 44% 83% 2009-10 Fringe Provisional Rate 2009-10 Indirect Provisional Rate 44% 83% 2008-09 Fringe Actual Rate 2008-09 Indirect Actual Rate 45% 82% 2007 -08 Fringe Actual Rate 2007-08 Indirect Actual Rate 45% 83% 2006-07 Fringe Actual Rate 2006-07 Indirect Actual Rate 46% 78% The SWFRPC has a "No Written Investment Policy", Any investments made by the SWFRPC must follow Florida Statute #218-415 which states: Those units of local government electing not to adopt a written investment policy may Invest or reinvest any surplus public funds in their control or possession In: (a) The Local Government Surplus funds Trust Fund (A, Prime SBA) (b) Securities and Exchange Commission registered money market funds. (c) Interest-bearing time deposits or savings accounts in qualified public depositories (d) Direct Obligations of the U.S. Treasury 9 16 j 1 C 2 2010-11 Budget Distribution by Agency NEP, 963'700'YJ 26% ( L _ ~l 1 MPO, 770,178. 21% ~RPC-Genl.' 724,155, 20% ~ RPC-SR, r--1.227,100. 29% Distribution of Revenue Misc.llnterest 1 % Grants-RPC Fund Balance -' 17% __~'~% ~ ~DRISINOPCS 11% ~ 4'~ ---- v-::'---l I \ / \ Grants-MPO Grants-NEP ~ 25% 27% Comparison of Expenses 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 o 10 !i1;'=~~=--ll ~ .RPC'sR I Ij uWPO ~ iI DNEP .ll ~IMi~~i:~!*iltt;:" 16 , 1 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL CAPITAL ASSETS POLICY Conforming to the requirements of GASB 34, we are formally setting the following guidelines for fixed assets capitalization and depreciation: Assets will be capitalized at $1,000 and above according to Florida Statue, Chapter 274, These assets will be inventoried using the Peachtree Fixed Assets Program. The depreciation method will be straight-line, full month, Useful life ranges are as follows: Buildings - 45 years Improvements other than buildings - 15 years Computer Equipment - 3 years Furniture and Fixtures - 7 years Vehicles and Equipment - 5 years This policy is effective as of October 1,2004, Any assets removed from the Fixed Assets inventory shall be submitted along with the Budget. 11 ~ f'") {:;t 16 It 1 C 2 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL COMPUTER DISPOSAL POLICY Effective Date: December 14,2007 Policy Statement: All Council-owned electronic equipment, including but not limited to, computers, monitors, faxes, copy machines, cell phones, and personal digital appliances (PDAs) with a printed circuit board that the Network Administrator has deemed to be surplus or non- usable shall be disposed of in a manner that is consistent with Federal, state and local statutes and regulations, with recycling being the preferred method, All equipment identified as surplus shall be recycled by the Council's selected and approved vendor list. In addition, all surplus computers or servers that contain hard drives shall be wiped clean or shall be destroyed by magnetic degaussing. If equipment is recycle/disposed through the Lee County Government Solid Waste Division there is a fee which is subject to change, Responsibility: The administration of the recycling program shall be under the Network Administrator and the Executive Director, The Network Administrator identifies equipment as surplus to the needs for the Council, the Executive Director, reviews, and approves these declarations and brings the matter before the Council for final approval. Action: The initial action is the Network Administrator presents the Executive Director a list of surplus equipment. This list depicts: purchase date, current capital value, and reason for designation as surplus and recommended method of disposal. Once a list is approved by the Executive Director, it is placed on the Council's Agenda in the Administrative Items section for final approval. Possible methods of disposal include: in-house auction of equipment, donation to other agencies, recycling, disposal or any other method deemed to be consistent with the purpose and mission of the Council. .. 16 ~.1 C2 Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Reserve Policy This policy is designed to guide the Council in financial policies to maintain a strong financial position. A strong financial position is important in the maintenance of services to the various counties and cities of the Council. The reserve policy is designed to allow the Council to maintain a fund balance level between four (4) and six (6) months of prior year general and special revenue expenditures as recommended by Governmental Accountants, The reserves are a component of the Council's fund balance which is reviewed by auditors as an indicator of financial health. Operating reserves are designed to provide the Council with funds in the event of revenue interruption, shortfalls or other unforeseen occurrence, Operating Reserves will be maintained at a level of at least four (4) months of average general and special revenue expenditures and will be increased annually, if possible, to reach a goal of six (6) months. This reserve will be maintained to meet the Council's needs in case of an emergency such as a natural disaster, In the event funds are utilized from the reserve, every effort will be made to restore the initial reserve amount in the ensuring years. As of October 1,2009, our designated reserve is six hundred forty-four thousand dollars ($644,000), Changes to this designated reserve will be reported annually as part of the financial statements and at the annual Budget presentation. 16 , 1 C 2 Calculation of Frlnae and Indirect Rates Source: CCAS Indirect Cost Rate (http://www.ccas.com/cgovcon.htm) CCAS produces and supports financial and government project accounting software Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Indirect Costs from The Division of Financial Advisory Services (http://ocm.od.nih.gov/dfaslfaqindirectcosts.htm) What is the difference between a direct cost and an Indirect cost? A direct cost is any cost that can be easily identified with a specific project (granUcontract): e.g., Salaries and Wages, Materials & Supplies, Subcontracts, Consultants. An indirect cost is any cost that cannot be easily identified (or it would not be cost effective to identify) to a specific project, but identified with two or more final cost objectives. There are three types of indirect costs: FrinQe Benefits: services or benefits provided to employees, e.g., Health Insurance, Payroll Taxes, Pension Contribution, Paid Absences, etc Overhead: indirect costs associated with the performance of a project. e.g., Facility Costs (rent, heat, electricity, etc.), General Laboratory Supplies, office supplies. etc. G&A: indirect costs associated with the overall management of an organization, e.g., President's Office, Human Resources Office, Accounting Office, etc. Determinina an Indirect-Cost Rate An indirect-cost rate is simply the ratio of indirect costs to some base or activity (that is, direct labor costs, labor hours, number of employees, space footage or total direct costs). We will use the ratio of indirect costs (excluding fringe) to direct labor costs to determine the actual indirect rate. (Overhead and G&A) The ratio of total fringe benefits to total salaries will be used to determine the actual fringe rate, (Fringe Benefits) Sept.2005 14