Backup Documents 04/27/2010 Item # 6BPage] of] 1-�
C�
q 1 H-u)(VI1?�
http: // maps. col lierappraiser.com /output/Co1Ger 2009_sdeO2377610809764.jpg 41512010
r"
y-. c a ♦ rtbh T gar
M a rJi'.m.Y
m
x•
r
a
A a a
i
e a
C
b
,px
Nie
y v a
t
r"
y-. c a ♦ rtbh T gar
M a rJi'.m.Y
FINAL REPORT UPDATE
Figure 2a. Feasibility Flowchart
I
i
Begin Evaluation
Was site
developed after _ _ Y.
date of public
knowledge?
.
Method 1: Use _.
equation 5 if volumes
No
known
t
Method 2: Use Table
if volumes not known I
Is the she used-
� ' No ".
during peak !refit
Method 3: Use default
noise conditions?
- 1dB(A) for weekdays
or- 2dB(A)for
weekends
i
Y es
Is the NAC
4 —.No..
approached or Yy_..�
....
exceeded?
is there substantial. Project not feasible for
noise level increase; - Yes -. �, Can 5 d8 insertioh.. No barriers. END
loss be obtained?
15dB(A)? � ANALYSIS
I I
No
No abater"
SEND ANALYSIS
ed �_.. —NO
13
i
i
Yet
I
" Do the owners
want abatement?.
Ys.
Barrier is feasible,
proceed to Reasonable
Matrix I