The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 03/23/2010 Item #16I 1611 UPON FILING THIS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE IT WAS DISCOVERED THERE WAS A MISTAKE REGARDING A DATE ON lTEM 1611 (A6) IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES THE CORRECT DATE IS OCTOBER 28, 2009 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE March 23, 2010 1611 1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED: A. Minutes: I) Affordable Housing Commission: Minutes of January 4,2010. 2) Animal Services Advisorv Board: Minutes of December IS, 2009. 3) Emergencv Medical Services Advisorv Council: Minutes of November 20, 2009. 4) Environmental Advisorv Council: Minutes of February 3. 2010. . 5) Golden Gate Beautification Advisorv Committee: Agenda of January 12, 2009. Minutes of December 8,2009; January 12,2010. 6) Immokalee Beautification Advisorv Committee: Agenda of November 18, 2009. Minutes of October 18, 2009. 7) Lelv Golf Estates Beautification Advisorv Committee: Agenda of January 21,2010. Minutes of December 17, 2009. 8) Ochopee Fire Control District Advisorv Committee: Minutes of December 7,2009. 1611 9) Pelican Bav Services Division Board: Agenda of December 2,2009; January 6, 2010; February 3, 2010; February 10,2010 Budget Subcommittee. Minutes of November 17, 2009 joint workshop wi Strategic Planning Committee; November 19, 2009 Session One; November 19,2009 Session Two; November 30, 2009 joint workshop wi Strategic Planning Committee; December 2, 2009; December 9, 2009 joint workshop wlStrategic Planning Committee; December 21,2009 joint workshop w/Strategic Planning Committee; January 6, 2010; January 11,2010 Educational Meeting afternoon; January 11,2010 Educational Mceting cvening; January 26,2010 Community Improvement Plan. 10) Radio Road Beautification Advisorv Committee: Agenda of February 16,2010. Minutes of January 19,2010. B. Other: l) Code Enforcement Special Magistrate: Minutes of February 5, 2010. . ~o ~"'v r_Cv \\\\\ \(tv 1. ~ 1l . "e<"> . fr~~ (P",<i-#' ",,,,(P~,,<i MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY d'" AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Fiala j)P (~ Halas ~, ~ Henning .y ~ / Coyle ~ r,oletta _ e Jlu~J.21~~A r Naples, Florida, January 4, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor, of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Vice Chair: Stephen Hruby Cormac Giblin Randy Anderson (Absent) John Cowan (Excused) Christian Davis (Excused) Christine Jones Kenneth Kelly Sally Masters Bradley Schiffer Stuart Warshauer - Alternate ALSO PRESENT: Marcy Krumbine, Director, Housing & Human Services Frank Ramsey, Housing Manager '"'Ii,_) t:y . 16 '\1 1 ~ 1 ~ January 4,2010 1. Call to Order - Chairman The meeting was called to order by Chairman Hruby at 3:04 PM. Chairman Hruby read the procedures to be followed during the Meeting. Marcy Krumbine noted Staff was taking the minutes for the meeting. 2. Roll Call of Committee Members and Staff The roll was taken and a quorum was established. 3. Approval of Minutes - December 7, 2009 Kenneth Kelly moved to approve the Minutes of the December 7, 2009 meeting as submitted. Second by Stuart Warshauer. Carried unanimously, 6-0. 4. Approval of Agenda Kenneth Kelly moved to approve the Agenda as submitted. Second by Sally Masters. Carried unanimously, 6-0. (Christine Jones arrived - time was not noted by Staff) 5. Information Items A. Presentation: Disaster Recovery Initiative - 3 Grants: Frank Ramsey Overview: . $6.5 Billion was appropriated by Congress for areas affected by weather-related and other natural disasters that occurred in 2008 . Allocation for Collier County: $9,963,208 (Tropical Storm Faye) Timeline: (dates are approximate) . RFP ("Request for Proposals") were issued . Submission deadline was December 21, 2009 - 11 proposals were received · Application ("Draft") will be submitted to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs ("DCA") by January 15,2010 · Application will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for final approval on January 26,2010 · DCA will perform site visits of proposed projects during February, 2010 · If approved, Collier County will enter into a contract with DCA in June, 2010 and Sub-Recipient Agreements will be initiated in July, 2010 Project Considerations: . Substantial disaster relief . Long-term recovery . Restoration of infrastructure . Housing and economic revitalization National Objectives: (one must be met by project) . Slum and blight . Urgent need . Primary benefit to low and moderate income individuals 2 16J~,Ll~A 1 I I Eligible Activities' . Affordable Housing: o Rehabilitation, demolition, replacement of damaged properties o Buyout and relocation . Restoration of lnfrastructure: oRe-establish/repair - water lines, wastewater services, storm water lines o Repair roads, sidewalks, public facilities Submitted Proposals: . Collier County Housing Authority - $4,072,600 . Immokalee CRA - $4,840, 604 . Immokalee Housing & Family Services - $210,000 . IHOPE, Inc. - $27,834 . mOPE, Inc. - $ 3,700 . Youth Haven - $450,486.50 . Retrofit of SW Florida - $300,000 . Bayshore Gateway CRA - $2,877,945 . Greater Immokalee Southside Front Porch - $93,384 . Collier County School District - $6,260,000 . Full Circle ("Goodlette Arms" Senior Housing) - $1,195,000 . I 4% of Grant must benefit affordable rental housing or equal portion will be withheld from allocation . Total requested: $20+ Million Proposal Selection: . Committee will provide final scores/rankings by January 6, 2010 . Selections will be included in Application to DCA . Award notices will be sent after BCC approves Application Grant Period: . 24 months commencing with execution of contract between DCA and County B. NSP Update - Frank Ramsey Project Summary Report for the period from March 9, 2009 through December 31, 2009 was distributed to the Committee members for their review. . Purchased properties - 28; approximately 48% of Grant funds have been spent ($3 M) . Remaining funds must be obligated (i.e., under contract) by September, 20] 0 . BCC has approved the Ordinance permitting the sale of purchased properties . PurchaselSale Contract form has been approved and contracts will be executed within the next 30 to 45 days . Bulk purchases have not been successful due to bank reticence . Banks have not released "new" foreclosed properties since October, 2009 . Anticipated releases from bank inventories - February, 2010 . NSP-2 Application - no response from HUD to date 3 16u~12'1 A \1, Chairman Hruby noted Marcy Krumbine has been invited to attend the Urban Land Institute's ("ULI") Spring Meeting in Boston as a panel member to discuss best practices for NSP in April, 2010. He further stated that he and Ms. Krumbine have been invited to attend the ULI's Second Annual Terwilliger Center for Workforce Housing Forum on February 8, 2010 in New York City as panel members. C. Subcommittee Update: ChairmanlFrank Ramsey . One, unified Subcommittee has been established . Task: (BCC request) to review Impact Fee Deferral Ordinance and recommend changes for approval by the BCC . Volunteers: Bradley Schiffer, Sally Masters, John Cowan, Cormac Giblin, Stuart Warshauer and Kenneth Kelly (Maximum: 5) There was a discussion concerning the unification of the Subcommittees and to reinstate both: Density Bonusllmpact Fee Deferral Subcommittee (#1) and Mortgage Financing IBanking Subcommittee (#2) Christine Jones, Kenneth Kelly, Sally Masters volunteered to serve on Subcommittee #2 while Chairman Hruby, Bradley Schiffer, Stuart Warshauer and Cormac Giblin will serve on Subcommittee # 1. An email will be sent to the absent Committee members to ascertain their interest. Frank Ramsey will send an email to the members of each Subcommittee with options for meeting schedules and locations. D. Continuum of Care Grants (Award/uses): Marcy Krumbine . Grants are awarded by Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") . Housing and Human Services serves as the lead agency . Programs assist the homeless . Grant allocation of $330,761 was awarded in December, 2009 . Sub-Recipient Agencies: o $104,645 - Collier County Hunger and Homeless Coalition to maintain and operate the Homeless Management Information System ("HMIS") o $113,000 - Shelter for Abused Women to support and operate the shelter for victims of domestic violence o $113,116 - St. Matthew's House to support and operate Wolfe Apartments (permanent housing facility) . Grants are renewed on a yearly basis E. Housing & Human Services Open House (summary): Frank Ramsey A PowerPoint presentation was given. Open House Date: January 4, 2010 Purpose: . Community outreach and networking . Educate partners . Promote H&HS programs and services · Collect donations for baskets for needy clients (20+) 4 16 I [ fl A 1 January 4,2010 Programs: . Affordable housing . Social Services . Services for Seniors . Nutrition services . Retired Seniors Volunteer Program . Federal Grant Management 111 F. Housing Related Grants: Frank Ramsey A detailed Summary Report was distributed to the Committee members for their review. . State Housing Initiatives Partnership ("SHIP") - $1,336,528 (temporarily suspended) . Disaster Recovery Initiative 2005 ("DRI") - $5,154,580 . Disaster Recovery Initiative 2008 ("DRI") - $9,963,208 (pending) . Neighborhood Stabilization Program ("NSP") - $7,306,755 . Home Investment Partnership Program ("HOME") - $754,154 · Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") - $2,348,840 · Community Development Block Grant Recovery ("CDBG-R") - $631,283 . Continuum of Care ("CoC") - $330,00 . Florida Homebuyer Opportunity Program - $431,868 · Neighborhood Stabilization Program-2 ("NSP-2") - $10,000,000 (pending) G. CDBG and HOME Cycle Applications: Marcy Krumbine · Applications were submitted for entitlement funds on December 31, 2009 . 27 proposals were received . Requests totaled approximately $8 M · Anticipated allocation amount: approximately $3 M . Committee will meet at the end of January · Recommended projects will be presented to the AHAC in February . Action Plan will be presented to the BCC in April . Final Plan will be submitted to HUD 6. Public Comments: None 7. Grant Application Cycle Committee Representation - Appointment of Sally Masters Kenneth Kelly moved to approve appointing Sally Masters to the CDBGIHOME Grant Applications Review Committee. Second by Bradley Schiffer. Carried unanimously, 6-"Yes"/1-"Abstention." Ms. Masters abstained. Next meeting: . February 8, 2010 - BCC Chambers (2nd Monday of the month) · Chairman Hruby noted that Ms. Krumbine and he will be absent due to their participation on the Workforce Housing panel. 5 16JiUI4'1AOt ':1 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned at 4:09 PM by order of the Chair. Collier County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee ~ -''7 ,------. (~~/~~--~~ '-, ~,~.__.. - ~t~f1h~u Itruby,-Chairman D~ 6;!,t___ The Minutes were approved by the Board/Committee Chair on ~,/4 f;,~/6 as presented , or as amended ~_. 6 .f>Ft~ Fiala --~ Halas Henning V' Coyle Coletta 16 I 1 A2' "'-l:/ December 15, 2009 ',;k+' " MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DOMESTIC ANIMAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE iIII!IIIII i Naples, Florida, December 15, 2009 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Domestic Animal Services Advisory Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 6:30 PM in REGULAR SESSION at Domestic Animal Services Training Room, Davis Blvd., East Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Michele Antonia (excused) VICE CHAIRMAN: Marcia Breithaupt Dr. Ruth Eisele Sergeant David Estes (excused) Tom Kepp, Jr. Sabina Musci (excused Jim Rich ALSO PRESENT: Amanda Townsend, Director- DAS Nan Gerhardt, Shelter Operations Manager Kathleen Drew, Volunteer Coordinator Dana Alger, DAS Animal Control Officer Hailey Alonso, Administrative Assistant :;c;L:L3!ID Kernl: llQlll)A;f--- Coptes to: 16 , 1 ~ 2 , December 15, 2009 I. Call to Order Vice Chairman Marcia Breithaupt called the meting to order at 6:30 PM. II. Attendance A quorum was established. 28 members of the public also attended. III. Approval of Agenda All items on the Agenda were shown on the overhead projector. Jim Rich moved to approve the agenda. Second by Tom Kepp. Carried unanimously, 4-0. Dr. Ruth Eisele moved to accept participation in the meeting via teleconference with Chairman Michele Antonia. Second by Jim Rich and ca"ied, 4-0. Chairman Michele Antonia participated via speaker phone. IV. Approval of Minutes - November 17, 2009 Tom Kepp moved to approve the minutes of November 17, 2009, as presented. Second by Dr. Ruth Eisele. Carried unanimously, 5-0. V. Old Business: A. Director's Report Amanda Townsend announced: . Hiring of a new Animal Control Officer . State Conference was attended by 3 staff members . Intake less busy - short staffing was spread thin between illnesses and other duties · Nan Gerhardt noted a thoroughbred horse was taken in to bring back to healthy status. Finding placement for horses proves to be difficult all over the country. Dana Alger spoke about: . Joining forces with the spay and neuter clinic, along with interpreters, conducting outreach in Naples Manor where door to door contact and word of mouth educational efforts were made. · This type of effort is being conducted once months in high- intense areas that are found to benefit from information on low-cost spay & neuter clinics and licensing requirements. Kathlene Drew reported: . Three schools were visited . Holiday and seasonal volunteers were back · Howl-a-Day Jubilee was a huge success, adding $4,000 to the Donation Trust Fund. 2 16 ,t!' 1A 2 ... December 15, 2009 B. Draft of Changes to the Animal Control Ordinance (handout of draft) Amanda Townsend explained: . Procedural steps taken and the various committees and departments involved when a revision to an Ordinance is undertaken . Following the various reviews and recommendations, the DASAB recommendations will be on the BCC agenda January 12,2010. The BCC will receive the final version at a later meeting for a final vote. . Each page of the Draft was reviewed and each proposed revision was discussed. Discussions of a lengthy nature were mostly on the Feral Cat and the Animal Tethering/chaining issues. Dr. Ruth Eisele and Tom Kepp had reservations on the temporary tethering language as to definition and enforceability, but agreed the law was a good start. Michele Antonia agreed. Speakers Teri Licastro spoke on her long-standing efforts to protect a chained dog. She told of her experience with enforcement by Animal Control- what is legal and what is right. She advocated for an anti-chaining provision in the law. Belen Briscoe, Dogs Deserve Better (handout-proposals re: tethering) spoke about the dated practice of chaining dogs which is a danger to dogs and to people. She was for anti-tethering and education on alternative restraint measures. She questioned the terminology of temporary tethering and its enforceability, stressing it was more difficult to make a weak law stronger than a strong law weaker. Her proposal list was taken under advisement. Amanda Townsend added that the change from the three-person panel to the Special Magistrate in appeals cases; and, if an owner chooses to appeal, what type of trial would ensue are in the language draft stages with the County Attorneys. She briefly reviewed the added Feral Cat section regarding the contract between Collier County and the Cat Coalition and the TNR program. Tom Kepp moved to recommend approval of all currently recommended changes to the Animal Control Ordinance, with the exception that Section 9 paragraph 2 be revised to read, "No domestic animal shall be chained, tethered, or otherwise tied to any inanimate objects such as trees, buildings or posts." Second by Dr. Ruth Eisele Discussion on adding and defining proper enclosure verbiage followed. 3 1611A2 , December 15, 2009 Tom Kepp amended his motion, adding And to further define as appropriate within the Animal Control Ordinance stipulations for proper enclosure that are more restrictive than those stipulated by State Statutes and that does not apply only to dangerous dogs but to all animals in Collier County. Dr. Ruth Eisele amended her second. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. C. Breeding Regulation Dr. Eisele requested the above item be placed on a future agenda to be determined later. Jim Rich moved to defer the Breeding Regulation item from the agenda to a future date, to be determined by Dr. Ruth Eisele. Second by Dr. Ruth Eisele. Carried unanimously, 5-0. VI. New Business A. Draft of TNR Program MOU (handout of draft) Amanda Townsend provided copies of the draft of the TNR Program Memorandum of Understanding between the Collier Community Cat Coalition and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners She reviewed with the DASAB Sections I through VI of the document which are going through review with the County Attorney's office. She explained the program will be reviewed again in three years by the Bee. After discussion 2.2 will read - Vaccinate and re-vaccinate for rabies... 2.7 will read - Remove adoptable kittens... Jim Rich moved to recommend approval of the TNR Program Memorandum of Understanding between Collier Community Cat Coalition and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners as presented with the following italicized words added: Section III 2.2 Vaccinate and re-vaccinate for rabies, the cats in the colony as appropriate Section III 2. 7 Remove adoptable kittens from the colony with the objective of placing them in permanent homes to live as domesticated cats. Second by Tom Kepp. Motion ca"ied 4 yes with I abstention. Michele Antonia abstained due to a conflict of interest as president of the Collier Community Cat Coalition. VII. Public Comments Gisela Rowley, a DAS volunteer, spoke on two points: 1. Feedback from adoptees which were very positive. She showed a copy of a letter and a picture of a healthy dog and told of different ways people who adopt from DAS are helped by staff and volunteers. 2. What she had observed in her many volunteer hours at DAS was how much the staff puts themselves out for the good of the animals. 4 16111A2 . December 15, 2009 VIII. Advisory Board Member Comments Tom Kepp express satisfaction with the votes on the Ordinance changes and the Cat Coalition TNR Program and asked for support when the vote comes up before the BCe. Jim Rich agreed Tom and thanked the public for their continued attendance and interest in DASAB meetings. Marcia Breithaupt asked about the absentee rules for Advisory Board members. She also announced January 7, 2010 at 7:00 pm Dr. Patricia McConnell, an animal behaviorist will present a lecture on "The Power of Pets" at Moorings Park. Amanda Townsend will post the notice on the Bulletin Board. Next meeting is scheduled for January 19,2010 at 6:30 PM. There being no further business for the good of the County, meeting was adjourned, by order of the Vice Chair at 8:27 PM. COLLIER COUNTY DOMESTIC ANIMAL SERVICES These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on ~~, / 9' Ql. 0 I 0 as presented , or as amended ><. ' 5 Fiala Halas Henning Coyle Coletta _ 07(~i RECEIVED FEB 1 8 2010 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COilllJ,';JcYCountyConwnlllloners EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES POLICY ADVISORY BOARD 16 111 ~ A 3/ November 20, 2009 Naples, Florida, November 20, 2009 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Emergency Medical Services Policy Advisory Board, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 4:00 PM in REGULAR SESSION at the Neighborhood Health Clinic, 12 Goodlette Road N., Naples, Florida, with the following Members present: CHAIRMAN: Vice Chair: James Talano, M.D. Chief Robert Metzger Chief Walter Kopka Linda Mitchell, RN Steve Shafor ALSO PRESENT: Jeffery A. Klatzkow, County Attcrney Dr. Robert Tober, Collier County Medical Director Jeff Page, Chief, Bureau of Emergency Services Dan Bowman, Deputy Chief, Bureau of Emergency Services Misc. Corres: 0ata:_~2.J~-- r.m It". UQLlJ)83 >;"'e\llu Novl~Jo, ~091 A 3 CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ESTABLISH QUORUM The Meeting was called to order at 4:04 PM by Chairman James Talano and a quorum was established. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING Add itionslDeleti onslCorrecti ons Adoption of Minutes September 25'h Minutes Chairman Talano moved to approve of the Minutesfrom the September 25,2009 meeting. Second by Vice Chairman Metzger. Carried unanimously, 5-0. AGENDA AdditionallDeletions Adoption of Agenda Chairman Talano moved to adopt the Agenda as presented. Second by Vice Chairman Metzger. Carried unanimously, 5-0. OLD BUSINESS Adoption of final Bylaws revised at September meeting Chairman Talano outlined the changes to the Bylaws: · Meetings will be held on a bi-monthly basis · Membership shall include the current Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners as a non-voting member who cannot act as either Chairman or Vice- Chairman of the Advisory Board · Members shall elect a Chairman and a Vice-Chairman at the first meeting held after January of each year There was a brief discussion ofbi-monthly versus quarterly meetings and the consensus favored holding bi-monthly meetings. Chairman Talano asked the members to review the Bylaws and forward their comments or suggestions either to the Secretary or to him prior to the next Advisory Board meeting when the members will vote to adopt the Bylaws. CPR "save" rates Dr. Robert Tober, Collier County Medical Director, outlined the following nationwide percentages obtained from The Journal of the American Heart Association: · Patient survivability to hospital release: 6% with no bystander CPR versus 14% with CPR 2 -----,--~-""._~_.._,, "--<---"-"-"--"'~'----~ 16 I 1 l^ 3 ~ ovem!~r ~, 20g · One-month survival with neurologically favorable result: 2% with no bystander CPR versus 4% with CPR · Collier County's data: 30% average (intact neurologic survival) Dr. Tober stated the American Heart Association recently changed its position regarding resuscitation and is encouraging the public to perform chest compressions without mouth-to- 1, ' mouth ventilation which is a protocol Collier County has followed for the past five years. He further stated that, as long as CPR was initiated, all cardiac arrest patients were included in the County's statistical record. He noted Collier County began passive oxygen insufflations approximately one year ago for witnessed ventricular fibrillation with evidence of gasping, which the AHA found to be "superior" to giving any ventilation to a patient in the initial phases of CPR. Collier County also initiated a pre-hospital hypothermia protocol and Dr. Tober outlined the ICE Therapy procedure. He stated the target is to obtain a one to two degree drop in a patient's core body temperature prior to delivery to a hospital. Evidence has indicated the cooling system protocol could recover an additional 10% of patients to favorable neurologic discharge. NEW BUSINESS a) Elsevier Resuscitation Article - Ambulance Deployment Strategies re: Cardiac Arrest Survival Dr. Tober noted the article compared patient outcomes in areas using a "tiered response" system compared to a "uniform response" system and stated Collier County uses semi- tiered response since part of its system is "targeted response" and part is "tiered response." The purpose of the tiered system is to save its ALS ("Advanced Life Support") capabilities for the worst call in order to allow the ALS engines to answer the calls faster. Collier County began a Med-Com program which places the County's most experienced medics in rapid response vehicles which operate approximately 12 hours per day. The vehicles are free to answer the worst sounding calls in the system. Dr. Tober stated the system effectively placed the worst patient in the care of the most experienced medic in a majority of the calls. The Emergency Response Dispatcher triages the calls by analyzing the index of severity of the situation and "rolls" the EMS vehicles as required. He further stated the tiered system brings the best critical thinking to the worst calls and the theory was supported by the article. At issue in Collier County: The difficulty is not in teaching a skill to a paramedic but in teaching when a skill is to be applied in order to give the patient the highest chance at survival. Discussion ensued concerning level of training. Higher level medical decision making resulted from targeting the best suited medic to the scene of a critical call. The type of call and what was needed determined who was sent. 3 16111113' ;1 *ovem~er ~, 20g . ' Dr. Tober cited from the article: "Over-utilization o.fparamedics on non-paramedic requiring calls will result in less opportunityfor individual paramedics to care for critically ill patients. skill deterioration, lower quality clinical performance and lower cardiac arrest survival rates. Conversely, ifparamedics are consistently sent to care/or patients in need of higher levels of training and skill. the paramedical will be better prepared to deliver intellectually and technically difficult care more effectively. " In his opinion, the article supported sending the best paramedics to a targeted response. Regarding the tiered system, Dr. Tober stated the goal is to implement an "Alpha - Bravo _ Charlie - DeIta- Echo" call system to enable tier the response based on the severity of the call. The Med-Com units are being targeted for quick response to the worst calls. The units are self-directed. The process to determine the best response to "Alpha - Bravo" calls is on-going. Vice-Chairman Metzger asked if there was a protocol concerning how the Med-Com dispatch themselves to an emergency that is either not critical (i.e., hand laceration) or in an area that is two zones away. His concern was whether this was a prudent use of resources. Dr. Tober stated a protocol has not been developed but the calls are monitored. The location of the next call is an unknown variable and the other units on the board will adjust their locations based on which unit is on a call. Chief Metzger requested that EMS provide the response data of the Med-Com units, i.e. what is the response time for Med-Com units for the past three months compared against the arrival times for the first responders. Steve Shafor noted it was important to have an EMS unit on scene as quickly as possible and it was as important to get the Med-Com unit to the more critical calls to provide an extra set of experienced hands. Dan Bowman, Deputy Chief, Bureau of Emergency Services, stated a Med-Com unit can break away from a call if needed elsewhere, while an ambulance or a fire engine cannot leave the scene. The Med-Com units move toward the direction of the scene but are not "screaming" down the road under siren. The "response mode" (using lights and sirens) will vary and is determined by the type of call. They are directed to not risk either their lives or the public'S life if the call is not critical. Linda Mitchell explained that hospitals have specific response teams based on training, for example, an ER nurse received different training than an OB nurse, and sometimes the nurse assigned to a patient may not be a member of the response team. Dr. Tober stated it is not "black and white" situation - the ability to assess the scene is important because additional injury may not be apparent initially and a rapid response will be stopped ifit is determined that the presence ofa Med-Com unit is not necessary. There was additional discussion concerning the efficiency of the system (24 transport units, 3 Med-Com units and 2 shift commanders), why transportation may not occur, i.e. family decision to drive the patient to hospital, and was there a lack of coverage or incomplete coverage. 4 '"----'-------~._--._~---, 16 Ii I 1A 3' November 20,2009 \Ill b) July 2008, Pre-hospital Emergency Care Article - Paramedic Benchmark Thresholds Does the number of system paramedics affect clinical benchmark thresholds? Dr. Tober stated his findings have been consistent with the findings stated in the article and cited: "As the number of paramedics in the system increases, the number of opportunities to meet critical care benchmark thresholds decreases and the achievement of critical care benchmarks is inversely proportional to the number of paramedics practicing in the system." He further cited: "... fewer paramedics in a system allow for an elite corps that performs ALS procedures routinely and who are superior to paramedics who may go weeks to months without providing advanced care." A question was asked concerning the data set utilized and Dr. Tober stated standards have not been established concerning the number of paramedics a system will require before it reaches a point of saturation. While the skill levels of the paramedics are tracked, the rotation of paramedics to busy sections is one of the best methods to keep skills sharp. Concerning a question posed in one of the articles, Dr. Tober stated Collier County's system has been effective, i.e. the first response is limited to BLS ("Basic Life Support") and a secondary response by ALS. He stated a better use of resources would be to develop faster BLS response times to achieve a goal of reaching a patient within 4 to 5 minutes of the 911 call. The national standard ofBLS response is within 8 to 9 minutes which will result in brain damagelbrain death. He concluded current medical literature does not support "flooding" system with large numbers of paramedics. c) University of Northern Colorado Study - Effectiveness of First Response Paramedics Dr. Tober stated many articles have found there was no advantage to uniform ALS response throughout an entire community. He reiterated the point that the most effective system is an initial response by BLS followed by an ALS response. Public Comment None Board Member Discussion Vice Chairman Metzger asked if there was any specific reason why the Advisory Board's meetings were confined to a period of one hour and asked if future meetings could be expanded to two hours. County Attorney Jeff Klatzkow stated the Advisory Board can determine the length of their meetings. Several different times were suggested, including holding the meetings from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. 5 1 L "1 ~ ^ '2 ~ o N1vembt'z~009' Establish Next Meeting Date January 15,2010 from 3:30 to 5:00 PM at the Neighborhood Health Clinic located at 12 Goodlette Road N., Naples, Florida There being no further business for the good of the County, the Meeting concluded by order of the Chair at 5: 15 PM. COLLIER COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES POLICY ADVISORY BOARD James Talano, M.D., Chairman \-~cc j\ The Minutes were approved by the Board/Committee Chair on as presented ,/ , or as amended ~~~V' (\ ,I '}-." I 201(X~ 1 " """-Cf'\,Xd"'1 IS 2D 10 (J I 6 -_.~---_._--------,_.-., RECEIVED MAR 0 3 2tll0 16Ja,J 1 . - FebruattcSa801 0 ,~ Henning / MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL -r Naples, Florida, February 3, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Environmental Advisory Council in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION at Building "F" of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Dr. Judith Hushon VICE CHAIRMAN: Andrew Dickman Noah Standridge Michael V. Sorrell Patrick Peck ALSO PRESENT: Steve Williams, Assistant County Attorney Susan Mason, Principal Environmental Specialist Summer Araque, Sr. Environmental Specialist Carolina Valera, Principal Planner "lISC. Carres: Stephen Lenberger, Sr. Environme~: Specialist Item # uu_-O 3/ ~~ ~ 1 '. lGI. L \)4-4- .__.._~-_._.._-,,-- ""', "..... - ---~.~_."..._-,'~ .~ ,_._.......,_,..,"_~_._._....,. ,'"._._ '" r__.,_ ~",._..._.__".,..."..___< .r,', _,._..~...._~___..... ,_ _ 16'~'l'1A4 COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL AGENDA February 3, 2010 9:00 A.M. Commission Boardroom W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F") - Third Floor I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of January 6,2010 meeting minutes V. Upcoming Environmental Advisory Council Absences VI. Land Use Petitions - none VII. Consent Agenda 11ems A. Immokalee Area Master Plan VIII, New Business A. LDC Amendments 1. LDC sub.section 10.02.02 A: Environmentallmpacl Statements (Continued) Discussion on EAC Powers and Duties: Scope of land development project reviews (Code of Laws and Ordinances) 2. LDC sub.section 3.05.07 H.1.h: Recreational Uses Criteria in Preserves 3. LDC sub.section 3.05.07 H.1.h: Stormwaler Uses Criteria in Preserves IX. Old Business A. Update members on projects IX Subcomm Il1eo Reports X. Council Member Comments XI. Staff Comments XII. Public Comments XIII. Adjournment ..*.............*..**...........*W....******................*.*.**. Council Members: Please notify Summer Araaue. Environmental Services Senior Environmental ~ecla!!~ no later than 5:00 p.m. on January 29. 2910 if vou c'mnol al1end lhls mooting or if vou have a confllcl.and will abstain from voting on a I!otilion {252.6290L General Public. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. _ _ .__.._.__._._., _ _ _ _ .~__ _. __. .._d_..____u__._. -------- - ----~ 16 1"44 fl February 3, 2010 I. Call to Order Chairman Hushon called the meeting to order at 9:03 a.m. II. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established, III. Approval of Agenda Mr. Peck moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Standridge. Carried unanimously 4-0. Mr. Sorrell arrived at 9:04 a.m. IV. Approval of January 6, 2010 meeting minutes Mr. Dickman moved to approve the minutes subject to the following changes: . Page 2, Item VI, paragraph 2, line 1 .- from "Davidson Engineer" to "Davidson Engineering,.," . Page 4, paragraph 2 - Under "Reason" - from "The need for having a separMtt EISdocument and separate EIS a,fpr~~al process has be~n questioned that tly- envIronmental mfomlatlOn......, to The need for havmg a separate EIS ' document and separate EIS approval process has been questioned. It was felt that the environmental information ...... . Page 4, paragraph 3, linc 1 - add tbe word "that" "Discussion occurred noting that one function of the..." . Page 5, deletion of paragraph 2 - replacing it with the following "The EAC requested an opportunity to examine whether other additional information is required. They will be provided with details of what is proposed to be submitted and this item will be continued. " . Page 5, paragraph 5, line ? - from "outlinin" to "outlining" . Page 6, pargraph 6, line I (throughout the document) - from "LTCKSS" to "LT/CKSS" . Page 6, paragraph 8, line 2 - from "measure" to "measures" . Page 6, paragraph 8 from 3 - "protecton" to "protection" . Page 7, paragraph 1, line 2 - from "poicies" to "policies" . Page 8, paragraph 1, bullet point 2 - from "errounously" to "erroneously" . Page 8, paragraph 2, line I - from "noted is is.., to "noted it is..." . Page 8, paragraph 5, #4 - from "overlay restored to hIgh quality,.." to overlay that are restored to high quality..," . Page 9, paragraph I, #12 - from "Provide a data analysis.." to "Provide data analysis.. . " Second by Mr. Peck. Carried unanimously 5-0. V. Upcoming Environmental Advisory Council Absences None ~ ~ 161 1 'A 4 February 3, 20] 0 VI. Land Use Petitions - none VII. Consent Agenda Items A. Immokalee Area Master Plan Robert Mulhere, Mulhere Assoc. presented the document "Changes 10 Proposed lAMP: - Sources Are Highlighted as Follows, EAC - yellow. Consullan//CRAB - blue. CCPC Workshop "" Green" Also included was an emaij from Laura Gibson to Environmental Advisory Council :v1cmbers - Subject: "lmmokalee Area Masler Plan Review lhal conlained proposed changes by Staff" The Staff email included four comments which are not retlected in the revised document submitted. He will be incorporating the comments into the document. He noted additional revisions: 1. Added Policy 4.1.4 - will remove proposed language and utilize Staffs proposed language referenced in the above email. 2. The Council determined Scction 4.15 should be replaced with the language "Within 2 years of adoption of this Policy. the County, in conjunclion with the Community Redevelopmen/ Agency will undertake a survey 10 idenlifj' remaining existing scrub hay habUal wilhin Ihe lmmokalee Urhan Area, The availability of thai land should be invesligaled as upland miligalion areas in accordance with policy 1.1. 3 Developmenl should be direcled awayJi-om Ihese areas, though they could be mode availablefor passive recrealion The possibilily of rewording owners o/lhis scrub hobilal who mainlainlheir property in such a way to benefit Scruh Jays should be investigated" Existing Policy 4.1.5 be renumbered 4,1,6 accordingly. 3. Discussion occurred on the languagc throughout the document which requires a 2-year time frame for tasks to be completed. The timing may not be realistic based on future County Staffing levels, eRA funding considerations, etc. The Council requested Sla{frelay the concern 10 the Collier County Planning Commission and Ihe Board of County Commissioners, Chairman Hushon moved to accept this version of the lAMP (Immokalee Area Master Plan) with the additions discussed herein today including the Staff recommendations with exception of the recommendation #2for Policy 1.1.3. Also the addition of Policy 4.1.5 addressing Scrub Jays. Second by Mr. Dickman. Carried unanimuusly 5-0. VIII. New Business A. LDC Amendments 1. LDC sub-section 10.02.02 A: Environmental Impact Statements (Continued) LDC Amendment: 3 . 16/11A4 February 3, 2010 LDC PAGE: LDC10:6- LDCI0:l4 LDC SECTlON(S): 10.02.02 Submittal Requirements for All Applications CHA1\GE: Replace the requirement for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) witb submission of environmental data in which to review projects. Stephen Lenherger, Sr. Environmental Specialist presented the amendments noting hc will incorporate tbe following revisions based on EAe recommendations: . SectIOn A.3.a.i. - Proposes to add the requirement of a topographic map to a level of6" (1/2 foot) contours. . Section A.3.e.ii, linc 3 - Proposes to strike the word "interim" 7 . Section A.3.b - Proposes to add listed plant species to tbe survey " requirements if the listed plant amendment is adopted. . Section A.3.c.ii ~ Proposes to add language requiring "identification of natural flow"Yvays all the site plan. 1/ . Section A),b ~ Proposes to revise heading to "Listed Species and Bald Eagle, " . Section A. 3.d.ii ,Proposes to add language" to require "a clearance letter from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) before occUPWU:V of the site thar the levcl of cleanup is adequate for the development proposed on site" (or similar language). Mr. Standridge moved to approve the proposed LDC amendment with the additions listed above. Second by Mr. Sorrell. Mr. Dickman noted be intends to vote "no" and read a Policy from the Growth Management Plan outlining the requirement of an Environmental Impact Statement which is to ensure planning and zoning decisions are made by the determination of potential environmental impacts. The proposal is to eliminate the EIS process and based on the above Policy he questions whether the County currently has the authority to eliminate the requirement of an ElS submittal (without amending the Growth Management Plan). Stephen Lenberger noted the information proposed for submittals is the same as the infoTInation requircd in a current ElS. He proposed a language addition to the amendment as follows: "For PUD rezones and Conditional Use petitions, applicant shall collate and package applicable submittal data requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement document prior to public hearings and after all applicable StaiJreviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Alanager or designee prior to public hearings." 4 ._... '-_0__- - - -^.-"~,.._,,..~..~_._~-,"--_'_"-_..' ~'-"..'-'.,_._--->." ..,--...., 1 ._... -. "_"e" .. 1 ,.,..... .. , _.~.__._, . , , -. . ---.- , 16 I l~A 4 February 3, 2010 Mr. Standridge amended the motion to requiring the additions outlined in the original motion and incorporation of the language proposed by Mr. Lenberger above. Second by Mr. Sorrell. Motion carried 3 "yes" - 2 "no." /llr. Dickman and Chairman Hushon voted "110. " Chairman Hushon voted "no" as the EIS is a worthwhile document and would prefer revisions to the submittal requirements of an EIS as opposed to its elimination, Mr. Dickman stated his "no" votc is not a reflection of Staff's ability to make decisions on the data required to be submitted for applications processed under the proposed amendment. The current Growth Management Plan reqUlres an EIS and thc Land Developmcnt Code, may be amended to achieve the County's goals in streamlining the permit process, Mr. Sorrell noted he was "on the fence" in thc vote, however if it IS the County's intcnt to strcamline the pennit process, he is in favor of it. He is concerned some development applications currently reviewcd by the EAC wi II bypass the Counci I. Break: 10:53 a.m, Reconvened: 11 :05 a.m, Discussion took place on EAC Powers and Duties: Scope of Land Development project reviews (Code of Laws and Ordinances) CHANGE: Amcnd the type ofDevclopment Ordcrs to be revicwed by the EAC Stephen Lenberger noted the above item is not an LDC amendment, but an amendmcnt to the Code of Laws and Ordinances, The item is on thc Agenda " as it affects the EAC. Discussion occurred on: . The ramifications of the proposal in Section 8,06.03.L to eliminate the requirement for review of Developments of Regional Impacts (DRJ), Areas of Critical Statc Coneem/Special Treatment Zoning Overlays (ACSC/ST), . Possible delays in the permit process due (0 the requiremcnt outlined in Section 8.06,03.0, 3 where a Collier County Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners decision may refer an application back to the EAC for review, . Section, 8.06.03.LS,1 (2) - The current language proposed to be stricken, grants Slaffthe authority to administratively isslle an EIS waiver to applicants which may assist the County in the goals of streamlining the ETS process discussed under the previous item. 5 . 16 I 11' 1 A 4 February 3, 2010 . Consideration should be given to reviewing sites with potential environmental contamination (i.e. when a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment was required for a site, etc.) . Outlining the parameters for tbe review requirements for federally listed species and the Bald Eagle. Stephen Lenberger noted Staff will review the various parties input on the proposed Amendment and resubmit ilto the EA C for consideration at a future meeting. The Council decided to hear Item VIllA. 3 before Item VIllA.2 3. LDC Sub-Section 3.05.07 H.1.h: Stormwater Uses Criteria in preserve'S"1 LDC PAGE: LDC3:39 LDC SECTION: Section 3.05.07 Preservation Standards CHANGE: Add criteria for when treated storrnwater is allowed in preserves. fuJeakers Bruce Layman, Sr. Ecologist, Wilson Miller provided an ovcrview of the Amendment noting it has been prepared with input of the Stakeholders. He supports the proposed amendment with one revision to be addressed by Nicole Ryan. . Nicole Ryan, Conservancy of Southwest Florida noted the Conservancy was opposed to any storrnwater discharges into Preserves however consensus has been reached on the Amendment which provides protection of the xeric communities; the prohibition of discharging untreated stomlwater into Preserves; the requirement of monitoring and remediation and the regulating of the quantity ofwater allowed in the discharges. The language proposed in Section 3,05.07H.e.ii) is being revised by Stakeholdcrs and shc rccommended the Council approve the other Sections of the proposed Amendment. Their revised language will be rc-submitted to the EAC for review at a future meeting. Stephen Lenberger noted Staff has reviewed the proposed Amendment and supports the language, as written, including the concept of a future revision as referenced by Nicole Ryan, The Council recommended the following revisions: . Section 3.05.07H.e.i) line 3 - 4 - from".. . addressed in d above..," to .' ."addressed in d ii) above..." . Section 3.05.07.H.e.iii) - from "Storrnwater shall not be directly discharged into 322, 413..." to "Stormwater shall not be directly discharged into land designated as 322, 413..." Mr. Dickman moved to approve tile proposed LDC Amendment with tile addition of the two changes listed above and the exception of Se<1ion 6 1611 )\4 February 3, 2010 3. 05. 07H.e.ii) of the proposed Amendment which will be resubmitted to the EA C for re,'iew. Second by Mr. Peck. Carried 111lanimous(v 5-0. Stephen Lenberger requested direction from the Council ifprojects proposing to discharge stormwater into Preserves should be in the "Scope of land development pmjecl reviews (Code of Laws and Ordinances)" of the EAC. The Council noted these types of projects should be given consideration for an EAC review. 2. LDC Sub-Section 3.05.07 H.I .h: Recreational Uses Criteria in Preserves LDC PAGE: LDC3:39 LDC SECTlO'\J(S): 3.05,07 H Preservation Standards CHANGE: Add critcria for passive recreational uses allowed in preserves. ~eaker Kate Crosley, Conservancy of Southwest Florida noted the pathways in the Preserves should not be intrusive on the areas for Preservation. The proposed Amendment was drafted in conjunction with Stakeholders and addresses the conccms. She supports the proposed Amendment as written. Discussion occurred on the language in Scction 3.05.07,H.I .h,i.a)i), ii) - are paths' widths narrower than those proposed adequate for most users') The Council recommended the following revisions to the proposed Amendment: . Section 3.05.07.H. I .h.i.ali) - trom "Pedestrian pathways shall be kept to a maximum width ofS feel." to "Pedestrian pathways are recommended to be a width of 6 feet with a maximum width of 8 feet." . SeetiOlu.05.07.H.I.h,i.aliil -- trom "Shared use paths for use by golf carts, trams, bicycles. joggers, etc. shall be kept to a maximum width of 12 feeL" to "Shared use paths for use by golf carts, trams, bicycles, joggers, etc. are recommend to be a width of 10 feet with a maximum width of 12 feet. " . Section 3,05.07.H.l.h.i,alv) line 4 - 5 - from "shall be located on either side of the preserve." to "shall be locatcd along the side of tile pre."erve. " Dr. Hus/wl/llloved to upprove the proposed IDC Amendment subject to the above c1lal/ges. Second by Mr. Dickman. Carried unanimously 5-0. IX. Old Business A. Update members on projects ~ / 161 1 A 4 ., ~il February 3, 2010 None X. Subcommittee Reports None XI. Council Member Comments None XII. Staff Comments None '" XIII. Public Comments '7 ..... None There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of the Chair at 12:23 PM. COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ,.~ ~t0lYl.IJu9Jl.- hairman, Dr. Judith Hushon "-../ These Minutes w~proved by the Board/Chairman on J/J//(J as presented __, or as amended . 8 RECENED MAR Il 3 29\0 . f co\JnN CQmrn\ssioners Hoard 0 ~J 16" IFlala A~ Halas . Henning Coyle Coletta 2885 Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes- December 8, 2009 V. Transportation Maintenance Report - Hannula VI. Landscape Architects Report - McGee & Associates A. Hunter & Coronado B. West Entry Sign VII. VII. Landscape Architects Report - JRL Design A. Landscape Update VIII. Transportation Operations Report A. Budget - Caroline Soto B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard IX. Old Business A. Committee Member Term Expirations Mise Cones X. New Business A. FPL Vertical Light Poles Date:______ item # XI. Public Comments XII. Adjournment 1 . j i ;(\lJoty Conunlssionet$ 16 ~'~ tt,ll.1 < Halas ~ Henning " Coyle ' Coletta "J"~/€~ ! ~v , '~ECE,VEtJ . MAR 0 3 2910 GOLDEN GATE M.S.T. . ADVISORY MMITTE 2885 Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 200'1 MINUTES I. Call to order The meeting was called to order at 4: 17 p.m. by Chairman Richard Sims. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Barbara Segura, Richard Sims, Pat Spencer, Michael McElroy - Excused, Peggy Harris - Excused County: Darryl Richard - MSTU Project Manager, Pamela Lulich, Landscape Operations Manager, Caroline Soto - Management Budget Analyst, Tessie SilJery, MSTU Operations Coordinator Others: Michael McGee - McGee & Associates, Andrew Eisele - JRL Design, James Stephens, Hannula, Sue Flynn - Mancan III. Approval of Agenda Richard Sims moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Second by Barbara Segura. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. IV. Approval of Minutes - November 10, 2009 Richard Sims moved to approve the minutes as submitted. Second by Pat Spencer. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. V. Transportation Maintenance Report - Hannula ,_", ",we" James Stephen reported on the progress on trimming the Sabal Palms Q '2..[ "1 L / I . Golden Gate Parkway is completed. Jate",__ :/ ~l.J · 951 is 50% complete ,dil It _" llaIL0B ~ 1 16 ~I '1 A 5 IIIIJ 1 . South Side of Golden Gate Parkway will take longer due to number of plants and lane closures. . North Side close to completion It was noted all Hannula requested proposals have been submitted. (See attached) Darryl Richard reviewed proposals as follows: . Median #31 Landscape Berm around entrance sign. Staff requested quote be more detailed. Pat Spencer moved to accept Hannula proposal/or berm installation not to exceed $5,000. Second by Richard Sims. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. . Signature Tree Care proposal for Tropicana Boulevard between Golden Gate Parkwav and the large bridge. It was noted STC has arborist on staff. Richard Sims moved to accept Signature Tree Care proposal in the amount of $2,925. Second by Barbara Segura. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. . Tropicana Boulevard proposal to replace Juniper with Crown of Thorns Includes removal and replacing with one year guarantee. Richard Sims moved to accept Hannula proposal in the amount of $12,068. Second by Barbara Segura. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. . Sunshine Boulevard. Green Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkwav proposal for the removal and replacement of plants. James Stephen stated he would revise proposal. . Golden Gate Parkwav & 53rd - Main Line damage to be paid through Fund 111. . Irrigation Svstem Re- Wiring to be paid through Fund 111. This proposal is currently in the evaluation stage with CC VI. Landscape Architects Report - McGee & Associates A. Hunter & Coronado Mike McGee distributed a CD that included the cost estimate. (CD incl uded) He reported the following: . On December 16 the Project will be 90% complete. 2 16/~lkfA5 . Cost estimate includes installing pavers from tip 14' and then landscaping back from that point. . Evaluation Analysis due to change in curbing size approved by TECM will increase costs $60,000. Richard Sims stated he prefers pavers and is in favor of the 60% Plan. He does not want to pay additional costs. Pat Spencer expressed concern that a decision should be made by all 5 Committee Members. She prefers more plants. The Committee discussed plants versus pavers, drought tolerant plants, and pedestrians walking through plants versus pavers. The Committee came to a consensus they would not make a decision at this time. Mike McGee did mention to the Committee, not making a decision will delay the project. Darryl Richard urged Committee to view the CD on the reduction of 24" to 16" curbing before January meeting. B. West Entry Sign - None VII. Landscape Architects Report - JRL Design C. Landscape Update Andrew Eisele distributed and reviewed a Landscape Architect's Field Report. (See attached) Darryl Richard recommended Committee approve line items I and 2 included in the Sunshine Boulevard, Green Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway proposal to replace the Plumbago and install 40 Alamanda in place of missing plant.. Richard Sims moved to approve the replacement of Plumbago on Sunshine and Green and Alamanda not to exceed $2,000. Second by Pat Spencer. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. It was noted the reason Committee Members previously voted to hold meetings each month was to approve 60% Plan and keep the project going. Committee Members voiced disappointment that all members were not present to vote. VIII. Transportation Operations Report - None A. Budget - None. B. Project Manager Report - None. 3 16' IA5 .. , IX. Old Business A. Committee Member Term Expirations - None. X. New Business - None A. FPL Vertical Light Poles - None """11 XI. Public Comments - None. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned at 6:05 P.M. Golden Gate MSTU Advisory Committee c~Q ~/ ~ These minutes approved by the Committee/Board on as presented or amended The next meeting is scheduled for January 12, 2010 4:00 PM at Golden Gate Community Center Naples, Fl 4 16 I~ r -A 5 RECEIVED MAR 0 3 2810 Board of County COmmIssloners Fiala Halas Henning Coyle Coletta 2885 Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 SUMMARY OF MINUTES AND MOTIONS II. Approval of Agenda Richard Sims moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Second by Barbara Segura. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. III. Approval of Minutes - November 10,2009 Richard Sims moved to approve the minutes as submitted. Second by Pat Spencer. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. IV. Transportation Maintenance Report - Hannula Darryl Richard reviewed proposals as follows: Median #31 Landscape Berm around entrance sign. Pat Spencer moved to accept Hannula proposal for berm installation not to exceed $5,000. Second by Richard Sims. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. Signature Tree Care proposal for Tropicana Boulevard between Golden Gate Parkwav and the large bridge. It was noted STC has arborist on staff. Richard Sims moved to accept Signature Tree Care proposal in the amount of $2,925. Second by Barbara Segura. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. ,,:; .;orres: ",;;. ;."v ,'1# -iI',' I 6 I tl ~ A 5 Tropicana Boulevard proposal to replace Juniper with Crown of Thorns Includes removal and replacing with one year guarantee. Richard Sims moved to accept Hannula proposal in the amount of $12,068. Second by Barbara Segura. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. VII. Landscape Architects Report - JRL Design C. Landscape Update Darryl Richard recommended Committee approved line items 1 and 2 included in the Sunshine Boulevard, Green Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway proposal to replace the Plumbago and install 40 Alamanda where plants were missing. Richard Sims moved to approve the replacement of Plumbago on Sunshine and Green and Alamanda not to exceed $2000. Second by Pat Spencer. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. 2 t~t~~~~~~~~~~~=~~=~~~~~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~AWN~1 "~~~mm~~n~oo~o~c~c~~oo~m~o~~mm ~z~o~~~~~~oo rnrn~55~~~~~~~~~~~Qz~~OO~~~zQ~~ ~~~~~~~~<~~~ mmzQQzz~~~m~m~z~~Ooz$~~mO~~z z~~~zzm~rn~>~ ~<~<~mm~oo><>....~~~~,.oozz~~~>~~~~~mm ~*~~~~ZCm~~oo 44 ~~m Om~ mOO,. ~z-~n"4mm m ~~mm 0~~< mm~44~OO~Z~~-O- ~ moQ~o~ oo~ ~moo~~m4m~>~ OO~o~~oo~CmQmm~~~~~m ~m~QZm80Z OO~~~~~~4~O~' ~ozz ~~~~~~m~~oz~ ~Q ~~zoo~Q ~~~~~~~~-o~~ OZooW c~oo 4m'~~04> oorn >o4m~ Om OOCoZzrn O~4> Z~Q~z~>~~~m~ ~~ ioa~~~ o<~~~~~o~-~~ z O~ Z mZQ ~ZWm~~ ~~ w~mm 00 z 004>C~~~44 ~ 00~ 00 zmw oQ ZZ~ ~~ >~~ ~ ~m~~~mrnm~> z c C 00' ~ '>c ~ mZO~m04~ X 0' ~ ~ 00 moo - 00, Z 0 4 m m "'tJ m 0, m~ ~j ~: ..ifl4llt"'" ifl4llt _ 4It.....,...,.........,~...,....,.....,...,....., ...,..,.....,...,ifl-UIifl..iflifl.. _~ _~~t= ~ NNN N~- WWWO~NN5w~-o. _NOo~~_w_m~~~~ 2~2~0~~~~_OO~~oooooooo~~0~oo, ~g5g88g~~~ggggggggggggg~ggg~ ggggg8gggtggggggggggggggggg~ ",.'~ ~~~~~~~_~~~w~w~m~W~~MMW~W~WW t1:: it; ,; ~ w " ~ 0 " ~~ :. '1 ~ " 0 ~ :8:8 ~ ~ m " A 0 a; ~ c ", ~, 0' 0 ~~ A m m 0 w 0 0 ..<0 ~ 0 0 0 . ~ 0 0 ~~-~~- -~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ N~ .."'''' __<0 ,,<O~ c.j.,Ju. "A'" ~~~ ~ !: .. ..'" ~~ ~~ ~ o w " w <0 "w W ~ " o ~ ~ <0 m ~ A o ;:; <0 " ~ '" <0 ~ " o o " o _~_~M~~_M_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M ww Is gg i!lw ... ............ 0 .................. "'(Il~N~ wl......wW ~8J~~~cg=g~~g; IDOCDOOSO......OUlWO N~.oobg' :"g" .(,,)0, co.ooo ~ .9~o I' ~ i .1; I ~ .~ ~ c . a ~H ill -Hf : n B . o . 0 ~ ~ . = I 0 ~ till I . ~ - ~ ~ ......NOOUlN......N......WUlNUl -0-0 00 0 0. O:""-Ul-W 0:"" 0 ggggggggggggg ggggggsigggggg ~~~~~;;~;u~~;::tl615! t:: ~ fP G1 (;)Q ~ r- t:: ::;":::1 ~:::l ..... ~sgmmm~li~l!~ ~g:f 3;::l1S go go go !!. g (') III :;- Cl. ~ 0>>> 'g,,~ US"!!: 'g :::Ig:~~ ~;; ~.z ~ <Ilgog (Il(ll g- , " ;[ 3 ~ ................. ...... g;g:g:g;g:g:g;~ g:!2g:g: oooooooo__oCiloo:U ................................................""......0.............0 ~W~~~gN:::()O:::"lJ:;;::::. ~ggN-..J~~~ ~~~o: OOO......OOlNOlOl N ~o ~r:.c:~I;I;I;g'r;~~b;m~~ iT::7;& a is. 5. ~ 0 act:: a.!l do.:::!. -~~=w~~~~~o~o=o :::I~~gmm6i'm;;l~hllJ:~~ 0 s:~ 1il1il1il~1isg>1il"'"" 11 11))( -.., ~::;;I :riii. )>)>)>fC> s.!: ~. ~5' g.g.g.s.g. ~~. ~ab ~~ it~iSit - " gl>> O-.....afllO- <r 0, m '" o ~ ~ <;; ~ .... - o ooo~o~ ~z:~~~~ ~~g7:::jg: ~oOi"""":" o "" o A o <0 ": ~ .. ~ (ftfft if> M ", iflUlf.fib'lb'lif>tflfflffl ~~ . "" iD A ~ 0 3 ;:; . <0 ~ ~ A " ~ 0 ~ ~ '" 5' ,. <0 m m ~ ~ ~ m '" " ~ " A .. m ~ 0 w m A w ~ ~ A 5' ~ " ~wo w - ~ m 0 ~ . '" Q;)(..l 0 ~ 0 '" ~ 0 0 " 0 A a w 0 w 0 ~ 0 " 0 A _Mq)~~~~~~~~~~M~ :<0 I~ WN <00 ~~ g:~ f ~-~ ............ N W CD No,o>~O ......OCDWO ~'" :""OlN ~~9 OO~ 000 -:; W ........).,,) ~NOlO lOOWO ..<>>0,"0> Ci:8;;:l8 <.no u. 0 oOS.9 ~ ~ ~- ..... 00 o 00 o 00 o 00 o SS ,. "'i: OJ a ~a~ ~111 o " .s ~~~{,/tM~M~~~~~ ""'q)~M~~M~M~~M ': '" o A .. w '" :;: " ).,,)0; A<O ~'" :""'(0 2!.!B ,. 01 Oi&.!l 0) .......... ____<>>;::;:E ~ ~J;:~~!:;~ -..JOW......O....... :.....:.....(,,):.....0,(0. W......2!~.:::!~ ~~~{,/tii't~~~~~~~ III i/lille; ~"':l; ~8P " -:; W ........).,,) ~!\JCIl(l) .OWO.... ~~~g~g ~OOOO!\JW t..J 0 <.no:"'" (0 OlOSS~lO ~ c !!. .. ~a ill ,. ~ --. ~~! .0 _.......... _...... S ii' 0: ~~~n~-2: !\JOOlQ)OOl . i>>:""'i>>i>><.no ~......2!~.....~ 611~; r.' A,S '11IIII o o 3 3 ~ . ~ m . Gl o ,... c m z Gl c ,. ~ iil "3 " III c:~ f~c: .?'c:ft:::! N""!! g ~ '" .... 5 z ;I: U> -i c: -i en en "'0 ~ ~ ~ ~ c... - - I "'Tl "'Tl "'Tl l 0 0 cO' ..., AI ::J ::J Dl "'0 - 0 0 0 0 Dl (/l a. 0 0 !!!. c ::J (/l G) G) G) ::J r c ..., ::J r ~. ~. .... 0 ..., CD ::J ;>\ a. ::T 0 0 CD CD CD 0 Dl CD ..., c CD CD CD Dl CD ::J a c Dl Dl Dl ::J Dl ::J I ..., ~ d (/l 0 - ::J Qo Qo Qo () .... CD ~. CD .... en )> )> )> 0 iC' 0 ::J G) (/l lQ' (/l (/l (/l CD .... Dl ::J (/l (/l (/l .... ::J ::J AI o' Dl CD 0 0 0 0 p 0 CD CD ::J .... Dl 3 .J>. .J>. .J>. .J>. .J>. .J>. .J>. .J>. .J>. .J>. .J>. 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 9 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... G) G) ...... 0 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 0 0 0 ...... ...... () () ...... .... ...... ...... '" W .J>. --.J 01 0 '" ...... ...... "'0 .J>. ...... 0> 0 0 ...... 0> '" 0> '" --.J ~ ...... --.J ...... ...... 0> '" --.J .J>. ...... '" .J>. 01 0> 00 0 ...... 0 0> '" 0> 0> '" '" 0 ~ ~ 0 " _<D '" J'O ,. w '" <D ..... ~ ." ex> ~ ... 0 w -< ..... , , . I\> , I\> , , , 0 . I\> . , ~ w '" '" 0 ~ 0 I\> 0 <D 0 W I\> Z W 0 <D _w 0> ~ ~ 0> ~ -... w '" ~ '" j,. '" ~ ." <D '" W W 0 '" '" 0 '" -< ~ I\> ex> ~ ~ <D 0 ..... '" '" , , , '" . , , ~ ex> ..... '" ..... 0 <D <D 0 ..... 0 ~ 0 w 0 0 ..... 0> 0 0> -'" .. 0 <D !' '" ex> ..... ." 0> 0 , , , , . , , , , '" , , -< ~ I\> <D ~ 0 0 0 0 '- .. ? ." -< ~ 0 ." .. !'" ." -< ~ 0 !!: .. :" ." -< ~ 0 )> .., :" ." -< ~ 0 !!: ~ ." -< ~ 0 '- l: ? ." -< ~ 0 61<1 . A 5 (;) i' 2- " a. II> ." II> 3 c: " 0""(;) II> a. .. .....- .!>>",CIt NW~ C> (/l C> -i ... C ~ 16Itl"A5 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 4055- AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239~261 ~4007 O@)[fi)@]@@@)[~)(& @)[f@[}uD~@@~~@ lJD@O@] [f@[W@[f~ COPY TO: ~ OWNER D ARCHITECT D ENGINEER D CONSULTANT ~ MSTU Committee PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: Dates: 11/16/09 11/30/09 12/04/09 Times: 10-11 :30pm 3: 15-5:15 pm PRESENT: 11/16/09 11/30/09 12104/09 WORK IN PROGRESS: OBSERV A nONS: REVIEWS: REPORT: Golden Gate MSTU Hannula Landscaping - Jim Stevens REPORT NUMBER: JRL COMM No: 2 09018 Weather: Estimate % Complete: NI A Clear Temp Range: Mid 80s Schedule Unknown Conformance: A. Eisele. Jim Sfevens, Dale Hannula. Pam Lulich. Darryl Richard, Bob Peterson Andrew Eisele & David Cosslett Andrew Eisele. Jim Stevens, Pam Lulich, Darryl Richard No workers present. County Lot Exotics General Conditions - Landscape Maintenance Review 11/16/09 - Review 01 Golden Gale Parkway and 951 - "Natural look" Pruning tor Sabol Palms was discussed and agreed upon as the desired appearance ("9 and 3" Technique not required. Hannula to remove dead tronds and seed pods.) - Hannula to provide quote for removal of exotic species in County lot (Astaldi Area) including Australian Pines. Brazilian Pepper. and Acacio - Discussion of JRL creating a "Wish List" of recommendations for the replacement of struggling plant species in the MSTU medians. Quantities to be determined and field verified by Landscape Architect. (In Progress) - Requested JRL to complete tree count for Live Oaks on Tropicana Blvd that are in need of structural pruning ~ 30 Live Oaks. 3 Maples ("Signature" to review sizes and provide quote for work) Areas Covered (11/30/09): 1. Golden Gate Parkway (from Santo Borbora to Collier Blvd) 2. Sunshine Boulevard 3. Collier Blvd I CR 951 (from southern sign to northern sign) 4, Tropicana Blvd 5. Median on 18th Ave at 40th Terrace 6. Median on 18th PI at Sunset Rd 7. Median on Greene Blvd at Collier Blvd * = Included in Maintenance Report presented by JRL Design on 11/10/09 ~ 1611 1 A 5 . l LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 5'" AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES. FLORIDA 239-261-4007 Area 1: Golden Gate Parkway . Remove deod Pine tree in medion west of 44th Sf. . Foxtail Palms west of new pedestrian bridges are yellowing and are in need of fertilization. (Treated by Hannula - Continue to Monitor) . Dead Juniper near newly pianted Sabal Palms at eastern end of Parkway to be replaced. (Due to Pump being down - Pump replacement scheduled for December 12, 2009). . . Sabal Palm pruning of dead fronds and seed pods are 100% complete. . . Presence of Exotic Species on South side of Parkway near Santa Barbara Blvd - Hannula to provide quote for the removal of I large Australian Pine & Brazilian Pepper beneath. and I Acacia tree, . . Dry Spots present at eastern end of Parkway (near Golden Gate Country Club) (Due to Pump being down - Pump replacement scheduted for Decernber 12, 2009). . . Deadlbrown spots in juniper beds need to be cut out; significant holes need to be replanted. Possible fungal problem - send samples to A&L Laboratories for testing. Potential replacement per JRL's recommendations. . . Saw Palmetto hanging into Left Turn Lane at 52'd Terrace has been pruned but should be trirnmed back an additional 18" from the back of curb for safety issues. . . Empty spots in Fakahatchee Grass Beds to be filled in with new. . . Sword Fern bed is showing signs of stress along edges closest to vehicular lanes; remove dead foliage . Hannula is consistent about maintaining plantings in Site Lines at 24" Area 2: Sunshine Boulevard . . Deadlbrown spots in Juniper beds need to be cut out: significant holes need to be replanted. Possible fungal problem - send samples to A&L Laboratories for testing. Potential replacement per JRL's recommendations. . . Dead plants in Ptumbago beds need to be replaced: dead branches to be pruned. According to Hannula's Reports these plants have been sprayed with pesticide: showing little signs of recovery. Potential replacement per JRL's recommendations. Possible recommendations include flax lily and dwf fire bush in alternating plant beds. ,. . . Tree Staking - Tabebuia at north end have been recently staked: numerous trees along medians need to be staked or stakeslleaders repaired or tightened. . Cassia tree has broken branch requiring removal. . . Crepe Myrtle recornmendations: Fertilization. thinning. and proper pruning to take place in falllwinter months to encourage new growth and blooming . Hannula is consistent about maintaining plantings in Site Lines at 24" Area 3: Collier Boulevard (tram western sign to eastern sign) . . Sabal Palms are in need of pruning of dead fronds and seed pods . Understory plantings have been recently pruned - looks good . Crepe Myrtle are competing with Sabal Palms. JRL recommends thinning. lowering. and proper pruning to take place in falllwinter months to encourage new growth and blooming. as well as. to reduce the competition between species. , AS ~ 16 , i " lANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 4055'" AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES. FLORIDA 239-261-4007 DESIGN . Remove dead plants and weeds trom Dune Sunflower beds to allow plants to naturally spread and reseed. JRL to recommend alternative plant option for junipers in wet location at the 17th Ave intersection. Hannula has removed struggling juniper. . Dead plants in Plumbago beds need to be replaced: dead branches ta be pruned. Potential replacement per JRt's recommendations. Hannula is consistent about maintaining plantings in Site Lines at 24" . . . Area 4: Troplcana Boulevard . . Sabal Palms are in need of pruning of dead fronds and seed pods. . . Deadlbrown spots in Juniper beds need to be cut out: significant holes need to be replanted. Possible fungal problem - send samples to A&L Laboratories for testing. Potential replacement per JRL's recommendations. . . Empty spots in Fakahatchee Grass Beds to be filled. . . Dead plants in Plumbago beds need to be replaced: dead branches to be pruned. Potential replacement per JRL's recommendations. . . Ixora showing signs ot stress: fertilization required. Dead plants to be replaced: dead branches to be pruned. Potential replacement per JRL's recommendations, . Cassia leaning into roadway is competing with Sabals and shall be removed. Hannula to review contract for debris removal for certain sizes of tree and provide quote if applicable. . Hannula is consistent about maintaining plantings in Site Lines at 24" Area 5: Median an 18'" Ave at 40'" Terrace . . Sabol Palms are in need of pruning of dead fronds and seed pods (See IMG-22) Area 6: Median on 18'" PI at Sunset Rd. . . Sabal Palms are in need of pruning of dead fronds and seed pods (See IMG-24) Area 7: Median on Greene Blvd at Collier Blvd . Sabal Palms are in need of pruning of dead fronds and seed pods (See IMG-24) . Alamanda have become leggy and appear unhealthy. Potential replacement per JRL's recommendations. ACTION REQUIRED: Review report for actions required Reported by: Andrew Eisele, ASLA. registered landscape architect David Casslell. prafessianal assaciate .& 4ftfrH~;"_ t\II~.;III!! i i41 ~\\ Iliil' 1,I~iil,'1 '\ I ~. I il \~l, ~ :1\ \~;w!J ~ -l~~' li1i\1- ~;) I ' Iii: - JIID- .' Itill! '~ ~f\i~~ Il~ ~ . itJ I: ~ I I I,! I / ____----~ 11!11! J - ~lll~ / / _n ;ti\-l. . I~, ~1.JJj_-. Li!;; IT-; f!lr.1 !!l /////~-_)~ 'lJ1,: ". - / / / ~- i iLi;,~,_. , .____- '-E" ., I' --', -............ A-l'I;~!JF:., ~ ~~ ~ / I$J -i 'J' ~ !! I ~"I iil,~ . "~!!il ~i1- 2J W(! I ~'- 'rJ,!,ll- .'~ l, ' / ~ :1llr~n_-.1 A]J IT:: 1 , --1:-: 1- J/......... " / ~- r +;h ~ I' I! [~ .& // ~'I 1[1-1- -1' -li!,\~ // r$ 11\ -. - i it':' / . ~Jttl.'~=~ ~ ,. _ ..1-:...__-- $jl*lf .~!ill~ llt~+~ ii~M I ~c~lf~:_ .11&1 @~Jl' ~ : 'flI1@l ~ ," Tt . -0i '~:~'j. @J -rr ,',: '-f:" .;+., I " ~,-ld~fJ ~ I l1J I @i- l\Hf}[--.J -. I iil ilk-i~ 1':1 I ,\ 'IH~~ iil ii IX ~YI i '~WI~ ~ 4 ~ n , D . U ~ , p " " ~ p , . . " ~ , p . , " o .,. a c " , n , . < i ~ 3 p , p , " p n , . D ;; r < " ~ N P , o TI , P C , ~ < , ~ o , rr po ~ ^ ' [) :'J , . . " p n , " . , " , ~ T o , ., -~--/ ~ ~ . , g , . u . , TI p n g C ; ,~ u ,~ \ u"j" , " , ~ ~ :~ " " , ," o g u p I 4 " o , 16'iA5., , ~w "0 " , ID "" .5j ~ ~ l;;) ~ p TI , w~ 9~ ~~ '0 ~- <+ iDro p " ~~j "v ~e , , oS v ," ~ - . , . , WTI o ~ J_ IDe "n Is'l1 ~-~, G) 00 0.... ::00 -1~m l' ~)>z ~~ - 0 G) H ~ 0)> h r-~.... " :2 "'PIm :i:O I t^I ~[ )>~OJ ~)>m z-<)> G')QOC I "lJ :I: :::! ~)>c'TI ~r-Z- ~m-lO :4 =1 m)> .~, m::O.... "~ ~O g cz P r- m3: ~. ~ ::o~ ~ 0"" 5 . ~ C ~ . , , ~ , p n o , o ID , P ,. ~ ~ '~ n p ~ , ~ . p , ~ , .:; , " " ::J '" li '0 '" co '" -t ::0 , lJ , I\) () o ;l ~ Ullll Gi> zm r-lll Gia I -t, mGi r-::t m::j ()Z ;ti" nilO )>m r-, Ulm -<0 Ul-t -t;Q m(i ;:> r- lJ '" ~ lJ iii ::J VI Qo Ul '0 '" '" :i g o' ::J VI -t o ~ r- (fl m o -t o Z en ,. ~ - ;;r ~ o '" (Q ;;r (fl"" '" "'w .l. '" ~- g o o - "" "" "" I\) -..... I\) ..... iJ> <Xl W W c.nu. 00 00 00 00 ~ .... ~o, (X)m~ cn(,9-69-ER '" .,. 8'.""" ~t.n~~ !!!.o<oo =00.,.. -EIt {fl (R fit '" .... :""wCo<.l'l COC>>U'IC>> -"O-JO c>>o:p..i\J cooaco WI\) I"Tl o S' t: Cir :J.;;r '< '" @ ~- ::0 _UlZolJ(j) 5'I::O ~o_5._asa.(tlCD ==~..,soQ)a-3 :5" _ Q) .., - .... 0 C1r""Oo-s:~~:< c:~ ""-0"0 -.., g.Ctl a.",.2.iii"'fgO Qo "''''''''::JlJl::'8~a. ~-t~g:rn~lll'!2.iii' o.g ace ~ ;::0:0.-''8 Q)"c/)O"::::!l;::;.:2:g&cn C" 2. (1) ::J ::T ::J "0 o' <'D o T ~ (tl .., 3 en ::J 0 "'''(1)CCoco2.OO- ro 0 en @ a a. - 3 '" iA c: 0. a. .., -. =_ >< QQ"'=fCD~~_~!e o ~ (t) "0 (tl en 0 0" ~ ::Jg.CDCI)~OOCDcc CD c."" ~m~ CDOC:"2,. @'" ..... ><!il'8.3'~ ",!!l..g=l. '" - '" '" =;.." @ (J) <' 3 (t) == ~~g'":, moc.=: 0_::J0 ::JcO'::J .., m sa. m en::J..,"O ~'<2V1 ~g,,,,,~o -. (l) Q) ""O::J == :T""'Ig::J -rc--g o 00. ~~~~ '"0 ::JG) ~..,c..a. CD Q):::': _ _ @::J cc-oo"C _ 0."'0 (1JDi""iii" Q "'_ a ::J CD ::J _ ~ CD ~ 0' ~:::: "'0 ::J .., ::J CD "'0 co ~ a. ..., Q) (1 CD .2. m o ~ (t) !l:l 3 0. ~ '0 ~ ! ~ (5' a. 2. - Cil '" ~ p ~ =i' cO' !!l. o' ::J VI CD '" < '" Qo 3 '" :;' a g o' ::J !" IO~ :"" ~ II ~ Ullll -> -t(fl !" mm lJlll ::0_ me ~!!! ~iil ::je Om zs; 1100 G'lC ~~ 00 -Z Z. G'l" ;Q m " > ~ -t o Z > Z e e in " o (fl > , WI\)~ >;:lJlll q>~~lii ~~;:m -mmlll ~zz- e _)>-IC tD ::OzQoCl .. mo~m n om m Z ::!. ~o::om g. 0"Tl "Tl~ :s lJ-t~, !;~;:" Z"Tl)>;Q Ul"TlZO -() () m'- m roO o~ z-t om s; en a.lJlJlJ g a ~ ~ 3'" :S. () () 0.00 coCD=::J ~ tu ai' ~ en ::J .., Q) a.()Q, 300 '" c: 0 -. ::J 0 3.-<"t: 0;' Qo 3 ::J '" '0 "Tl ::J ",0- ~OVl g -t ::J lJ -0 @ =: Q,~ r-r-r- 000 ~ ~ ~ cnflt-Ef){R '" .,. I\) .l. - OJ\JOI"'-J ..oow WaDO =000 000 (;It fit -EIt -ER W I\) ):a..NU,-J woow 0000 0000 0000 ~~ 6' lS s;e >!!l. -t.. moo ;Q'" _ 0 >- r-O (flU> ll" ~ ;Q " III a en o ::t m e e r- m en N' .. 110 CIl 'tl .. n :ii n l>> - o' :s e :s ;:;: ~ en ;: ~ ;:;: o " z o Z o 'T1 -t 0 o 0 [ ~ (fl o o .. - " \ ClOO 000 "r- er-r- m-- Zmm ;Q;Q "00 >00 -tee mzz iJi::;!::;! -t'tllll e;:o- ooe G'l'-Z Omo o. 6 -t I mz 20 ,,' )> -t m " > ;Q " ~ -< ::E m en -t m Z -t ;:0 -< en Gi Z --.+.--.-^.,,-,....,.-_____.~___.._M'..'..~ -I ;u , II , ... -I o i;! r OJ > (II m !!! o (II m o -l o 2 (II -(II'" ::re o cr e - lQ 0 ::rlil'''' - '" <<'" '" I\>~ "'01\> mw""":" ...~", 0>"'''' a~o <o~o 16 , 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~< m m m m m' ~2~~~2~~Cm~~OWN~C .~...~. ~ .~.. ~ ~~(flmm~(flI~(fl(fl(fl~O~-l-l~ ~c~cc~mm_mmm~C~~~1 nl~~~O@3~~~~'m~~m~ ~OS55c~~C~~~~n~~m~ ::J:D> a-a-2~ 0;' OJ '0 '0 '0 (/le::r" (II~ OJ "0-'-'0 ChQ)Q)Q) C/)Q)Q) ZO ::TQ)Q) (iJ"O 333 :S.:S'~' ~ Dr 232. 2.00'0 ~ '" '" '" ca'(t::r '" -- <1>", ::l:::l:::l: S'lQ.;? ~ C:;' =:=:<:;'cn 000 -.(DC/) >1>>_ ~--men- D>3D> -l o ~ Q ::a ci ~ ~ 3' a::r m 2 Sg~.:Ch:;'~ (fl-Q)Q):::US>> 0. _. '" C'l :; 3 2t(J)~ @~ ~.(1) " D> - z_ (II 3 - (fl~ '" D> ::l:::> -en ~'8 "'::l. . D> c.::t. '" 0 '0 '" :7 OJ N~ C'l 0. " - , Gl ?a3 0'0. D> '" lQ)> m D> --I 0> ... '" (/lll-< :- 5' ~ )>~o " O:l: <g ~ 0 ~~~ :J 0 ~ '" ~ - .0 0 ~~..., ~ :J ~ !aQ:J D>-O 3-1_ - ::r o -I ~ ::r :J 0 3 (/l~~ 00. co co ~~ , . . "''''''' 0=:: ~~;:r en en--en D> :J~"'Q c.' . co '" I\> a~~ :l: 0 0 :J 0 0 (flmm . D> D> "fl. . ~ 0<0'" ~m:j --I "''''''' OI\>l\> rvtvrv "''''''' "''''''' '" "oI\JCD ",~... --10>'" :""'0;"" 0>0'" ~~ < D> ~ 'l. (/l"fl n:l :::;' :l: '" llg D> en 3::r '" ::l: o --I'" coco ~~ 1\>1\> ...... . . ::r ::r - - :......:...... en en '0'0 ;"'l :"" CJ:!~ o 0 ~ ~ mm D> D> ~'" ...'" "'''' '" 0>0> 00 00 "'''' "'I\> o~ "'0 00 00 000 D> D> D> 0'0'0' 0'0'0' D> D> D> coco co '" '" '" llllll D> D> D> 333 ~ ~ ~ CJ;!~~ OOJO CD"gCD' D>_D> ~ '" ~ -0.- 2.-+2 :J 2 ::> "'",'" 1>~1i' :-c-:- ~-~ ~0::T ;- ~.: :J - :J o :J 0 0'00' " 0' " 333 mmm ~ !U ~ 1\>1\>1\> '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ 1\>1\>'" "''''... 000 000 '" '" '" 1\>1\>1\> "''''''' 00'" 000 000 ---~,.,._~^..~----,-_._-^_._..- O'-Gl D> D> 0 Sac: '" '0 '" 0.::r:J - D> ~ -i 2 3 '0 ~ -I ~ '" '" o D> ,.. ~...~ ~~~ 1\):-+..... q~~ ::r -::r ;+ Vl :- '0 ......;"'10> a. - - OJ en en Qo '0 ~ [IJ;""'\ ~. ~ ~ C'l 9:. 2 III Qo !ll III Qo !ll mmm !l:l!>> Q) --1"'1\> '" '" '" '" I\> ~'" '" 0.9 000 000 "'''' '" I\> ~ ~ '" --10>0 01\>0 000 000 .. ~ (II N' '" !lO (II '0 '" C'l ~ C'l D> - o' ::> :to>!"> -<-l::O m' ~:: >m r~ (110 !lOr :EO Om ::02 ,,~ !!!~ om (II~ 0(11 ::J:-l me: o e:~ ro mr o m 2 Gl > iri.. ~ > ::0 " :E > -< :E m (II -l m 2 -l ::0 -< (II (5 2 !; 2 o (II o > ~ m 110 ::0 ::0 (5 > -l o 2 o o 3 3 o '" 2 D> 3 <1> e: '" =: o - ':" e: '" =: o o en - -l o - !!i. ,~ !" > > .., ... .., ... '" ~ ~ m '" c ... m ... 0 ;;j c: m ~ III c: f// ::c > z c n '" ~ z 0 ... ~ ::c 0 '" z .., \; z ~ f// f// ::c > ... -l ... ::0 III . m "U > , f// Q) .., '" g c: n m C III .. . > ;:: m '" (i > z ... > '" ;:: "l z > .., ... m .f// ... ... 0 '" 6 > 0 '" 1A5 ;5:- )>r -l::U m' ~l: )>~ ~"U7rCDen~--~~-l-'C-l-r"'<<llla"'"U"'-::u r~ ~-'~Q) Q) c: s::J 3.m;:;0 ~.., 0 3.' =<<- I = -3:::u C/J\" ~~go~Ia--'~"'~m"'c~3aa3~-~~~ _0 ~~~~~'Co~a::l_o~f//olll' CDCDlllaaS<IllG) -r 'ClO Illn=~--ID::l~-c:"'=Z~~~;~lOlll_~-o-~ <0 CD _ c: - ::r -- .., c" (J1 -a' I """'" c: .., I\) 0 (I) :::I ;;;j ::::S .... v .... \.1 tI' < -a3=Q)~mc:w iO:::lCDo::J~-Q)Q)~m~CD~:::I~com o3_~:::I_.~C"W(J1CDN-f//-@~~o~:::I:::I -o~~mO~~z ~ ~ c::J~C"mo"'~ CI\)C:::lCD>>~r:::lC:N~Z~~Q m~~~.m~Q)~mo~ ~c:~ff~~><C:E3~9~ ~ "'~:::I~O~~"'~O~~~~XI~OQ)1 1C"3C:Ill-CD~~~~m~ m~.c---~Ommwx~~ ~:::Im~ -'-. 1\)3> -~ ~::I_caQ.a-'::JcnCD~~=rou,8.cc- (J1Q)Q.::J(1tN ~:::t.om m~a-~c:~C">~~I\)Q)~~C:~~~9~~~~ommgC/J~ :C.., 3 0 Sl~ cnQ)[.9:Jj CD-~'E'5'i\)~ :1m UJ~~ ~CD 0Q~ 2!:! ~~ aa~i~:Eo ~~~-l3~~~~i-~CD'C~ ~n)> me CD:E::l()?Ill::U lllarOS:"'e."<_'x3.":ll:~o;5:f//CDr 0- ~S~~-~~~~g~oOCDNQ)~~~~c:m~~.N~C/J CQ Of//~~~"'maCD~aUt~Q)~~gg~~ic:cno~g~. ro - mcn-o ::llDv~O~N CD O_~:::I mr ~~~-.~o~CCC:J:=;OCD~cn~ca:::l~~a~CD~~ C o~om-~~g~ ~< ~~~~~~~~o~ ~ m O~~O~S~ ~5~~~~~~~a@>o~s'~~~ z ~~~~0~35~~xX<~~~~~'~~'~c~~~~ c.~ :J.<r.5 g.Q.CD ~ ~ I C/)~ CD t:D......~ Q.~ <"8~' -CD c e . aio <CDa~O~CD~a~~~w~~~w ~a3 _ :E~'C3ffgCDCDV<~XO<~~CD-o~CDg_::l O~'C -lm -IllCD_e.CDe<CD <f//< ~ f//e. c:~_ ~~~_. w_ ~~~~ ~_.~~C. C~'- ~~~~~~o~~~~CD~m-~c=3~w ~w< ~ =w ~~~~CD~CN~~~~eWa a~' ~~< > ~=~~w~'~x~S~J:~~Nga~=~<~<< ~g~ ~ mcrCD~~c ~o_ _ ~ ~<w~aw CD _. ~ .CD-CDc~~=w~-~w d alll-<IllCD~ <3~ < - < ~ - ~ - c.~ -. C/) ~ CD CD < ~~~~aICDZ CD~~CD> ~.~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ o~~ONS s.~~~o ~CD~~~! S~~ ~ 'Coe."U'Cm @V'Cmen ~~~CD3~ ",::l~ :E ~~crm~_ . c~_.Q. ~'~CD~crw CDCD~ m ~~'~~c.Q ~~~~ 3~~~0g. 0i.~ ~ o~o 'CD_. ~. ~o ~ooo~~ O_,~ ~ ~~g~~~ ~ ~a o~C.a~c Z~J:~ m -.- ~c~ @ 0 cr~~CD a g z 'CCDW~o~~ ~ ~< O~~-~CDm _w ~ _~~w_ <Ill X~_Wn ~ ::u ~ - -0) ~ - --_.~C/) ~~~ -.~w~m~ m ~< ~~~wo mO ~ ~.m~~c.o w <~ ~ ~~ ~O_ en ~0~m~~ c. ~~ ~ c~ CoC<mw cr ~ 3 ~o o~ 5 ~~~m~~ 0 ~ w~ g~ Z ~'a . c. c. Z ~< ~= g- ~. ~ ~ _. < 0 ~ -. r- 35- ~ "'g ~- Sl~ ~ Q.l -. a S' ~ ~ o' ~ z ~g~ S Q cr0 ~ ~ o C') W D.l 0 OJ (') -::T - "'0 x;:) > o Q.l"'2. "0 "0 a ~;:)~. a roO ~ -. ~ ;:) < ~ C ~CDC CD w~ ~ ~~Q.l C. 0_ . ~ - CD ~ CD :::u o(}1 ~ 30. :::u (lJq ~ crr:: Ci CD ".0 -<~ ~ ::l" ~-l ~l/D 0 III Z - ~ Z f// ~ ~ E ... '" m05 n c: ~ ~ > <5 ~o :'i z ::; f// .." ffi a ~ : !!! ~ ;:: 8 ~ ~ !ll ~i~ om m c: ~ ~ > z :'i ~ ::; f// -< fii ~ ~ !2 ~ ~ z ;:: ~ m ::c > m f// ;:: c: > '" ~ m m ;:: '" m i> z ... ~ f// ~ '" ~ ~ (i '" > '" ~ III <5 6 Z f// !" n '" ::c ~ el m ;: :!' m n > ~ ill ~ .., ~ \; n Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c: b 0 ;:: "'-l m ... )> ~ m r f// f//::! o:l m )> x;:: en ~ :!i m III m =tcntD ~ 6 C/l m o en,: -l 'Oz 0- ::u 0 -r Z Ze en "'0 _en!;;m ~c:::uo af:z:~ .gom-l ~;;!:- -~z <<'tI ::u ~~o Z ",~G) ....."'- NO> .....'" a~ ~w ~ '" 16 11 < ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ "'''' ~ ~ ~ acoco.......mU1 Q) ~'" '" ~ m mm mm m mmmmmm m , III ?> III ?> ?> ?> ?> ?> ?> ?> ?> ?> ?> ." '" ~ '" '" ~ N <0 Q) ~ '" -a.N~~~~ "'~ a '" ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ~. ~ '" :... ~ ~ ..... ~ '" '" '" ~ Ol ~ ~ ~ <0 Ol '" ~ '" '" <0 <0 '" ..... Ol '" ~ <0 Q) Q) ~ i:>> a '" a a a a a a a a a a :.. a a '" a a a a a a a a a a a ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Q) ~ ~ '" ~ ..... ..... Ol '" '" :... ~ :... ~ '" Ol ~ ~ '" ~ Ol '" ~ ~ <0 Ol ..... 8 '" a ~ ~ ~ ..... Q) '" ~ <0 Q) '" '" a ., a a a a a a a a a a '" a a '" a a a a a a a a a a a -.--..-."...,,"---..-.-->--.--- c: 2. - e :l ;:;: o o f// - -l o - ~ ..,~ 16 r 1 A5 ~ RECEIVED MAR 0 3 20m Fiala Halas Henning Coyle Coletta , Board of County Comm""""- ",.,yne", 2885 Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 MINUTES I. Call to order The meeting was called to order at 4: I 0 p.m. by Chairman Richard Sims. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Michael McElroy, Peggy Harris, Barbara Segura, Richard Sims, Pal Spencer County: Darryl Richard - MSTU Project Manager, Pamela Lulich, Landscape Operations Manager, Caroline Soto - Management Budget Analyst, Tessie Sillery - MSTU Operations Coordinator, Michelle Arnold - A TM Director, Bob Petersen - Project Manager Landscape Operations Others: Michael McGee - McGee & Associates, Andrew Eisele - JRL Design. James Stephens - Hannula, Sue Flynn - Kelly Services III. Approval of Agenda Move: ViII. Transportation Operations Report to V Vll. Landl'cape Architects Report - JRL to Vi. Vll. Landscape Architects Report - McGee & Associates to VIIi. Richard Sims moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by Peggy Harris. Motion carried unanimously5-0. IV. Approval of Minutes - December 8, 2009 Richard Sims moved to approve the minutes as su_t~e~econd by Peggy Harris. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Date: Item # '~\ -,s 1.; 16 r 1 'A5 V. Transportation Operations Report A. Budget - Caroline Soto distributed and reviewed the January 2010 Budget Report. (See attached) . Available Investment Interest - $3,559.29 . Available Operating Expensc - $54,889.74 . Available Improvements General- $1,363,050.00 . Purchase Orders to be Paid - $207,145.64 . Purchase Orders Paid - $89,793.12 B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard reported thc following installations at Golden Gate Parkway. . Contractors have confirmed permits have been acquired and installation will be completed within 30 days. . Landscape berm around entrance sign . "Welcome to Golden Gate"' aluminum entrance sign . Electricians will install lighting . "Adopt a Road" sign will be installed 10' behind new sign VI. Transportation Maintenance Report - Hannula James Stephen reported. . The Mainline leak on Golden Gate Parkway by the Fire Station has been repaired. . All the roadways and plants have been fertilized. . Items on "Checklist" from JRL have been addressed. . JRL confirmed completion. Mike McElroy noted heavy truck tire tracks on the medians. Contractor stated he was unawarc any of their trucks driving on medians and will investigate and report findings. Peggy Harris stated the medians had not been mowed for two months on Hunter or Coronado. The MSTU does not want to pay for what has not been done. James Stephen confirmed Hunter and Coronado medians are mowed on an "as needed" basis. He stated his Maintcnance Reports ret1ect thc mowing of Hunter and Coronado. It was noted the Crown of Thorn plants suffered some burn and leaf damage due to frost. Crown of Thorn are hardy plants and are expected to survive. VII. Landscape Architects Report - JRL Design C. Landscape Update Andrew Eisele distributed a Landscape Architect's Field Report. (See attached) 2 16 , 1 AS Planting design has been completed for Tropicana Boulevard's medians. Hannula will submit a revised proposal per design. '4C VIII. Landscape Architects Report - McGee & Associates A. Hunter & Coronado Mike McGee distributed and reviewed the Coronado and Hunter Median Improvement Plans 60% Opinion of Probable for Paver, Curbing and Landscape Changes Report. The Committee was directed to cross off under "Notes" comment #2 does not apply. He also distributed and reviewed the Coronado and Hunter Median Improvement Plans 60% Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Report. (See 2 attachments) He noted TECM requested the following: . To eliminate the left turn lane at 52nd and Coronado. . Install a "pork chop" median at 52nd and Coronado to only allow a left turn. . Report based on Cost for Median 14. (See attached) The Committee discussed plants versus pavers, drought tolerant plants, and pedestrians walking through plants and pavers. Committee members made the following comments: y Plant costs versus paver costs makes you want to choose pavers. .,. Turn lanes curbing caused areas to small narrow to plant in. .,. 100 foot of pavers is different from all the other roads. .,. Too many pavers do not look good. y Medians are to landscape. Speaker Bob Petersen, a Golden Gate resident since 1986 expressed concern on installing pavers and stated the public prefers to see plants over pavers. As a taxpayer, he would like to see plants in the medians. Discussion followed concerning zoned watering, the irrigation manager, non-irrigated medians and once plants are established; cutting back on watering by requesting Landscape Architects report when watering needs to be done. A suggestion was made to use pavers in commercial areas. It was noted there could be safety issues with uncontrolled pedestrian traffic. Pavers and plants can be used to direct tratlic. The Committee formed a consensus Coronado medians 3, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11 will be plants and the ones not listed will be pavers. , J 16 , 1 ,A r: I ~ It was noted the difference in costs for installation between 16" and 24" curbing is approximately $1.00 per lineal foot. Mike McElroy moved to reduce the (F) curbing from 24"width to 16" width and reduce pavers and landscape in those areas. Second by Peggy Harris. Motion passed 3-2. Richard Sims and Barbara Segura opposed. ..... Darryl Richard suggested the Committee approve the proposal for additional services for Landscape Architect and Engineering addressing the curbing and landscaping modification. The additional services Number 2 require 30 additional working days added to Design Schedule. Pat Spencer moved to accept (McGee & Associates) proposalfor additional (architect) landscape services not to exceed $7,500. Second by Mike McElroy. Motion passed 4-1. Richard Sims opposed. B. West Entry Sign - None IX. Old Business A. Committee Member Term Expirations - None. X. New Business A. FPL Vertical Light Poles - None XI. Public Comments - None. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned at 5:30 P.M. Golden Gate MSTU Advisory Committee These minutes approved by the Committee/Board on ~ - '1- ;).0/0 , as presented or amended ~ . The next meeting is scheduled for February 9, 2010 4:00 PM at Golden Gate Community Center Naples, Fl 4 t~t~=~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..~m=:WN:o~g~~~.WN~ ~~~~~~~n~oo~o~C~C>~0zm~O>zmm mrn~6c~~~~~~m~Q~~QZF~w~~~z2~~ mmzQ8zz~~~m~m~z~~0Il>nz~~~mIl>0~~z ~~0mmW~> >~7~ ~-Z 7~> ~~ mmm <<~~~~~r~~Om~~m~Q~ rz~~o~~mm rn~~i~~~g~~~~~~~>~~ ~~~~~~(")~~ ~8zz =~~m~~~~m~z~ ~Q ~~z~~Q oz~w C~0~~mrg~o~~ ~~ c~Q~m~ O~M~ ~ Q~~~~z~~~m ~m ~~O~~m z ~ z mw~1 mQ m>~ ~~ oocm_ 00 i 8~ g zm~ g ~~~ ~r ~~i Q ~ ~ ~ 00 mOO _ ~~c m " m ~z(")o~~:::uzz~oo ~2JH~~~nlrii:!i1D!ji z(1l~::ozzm::ow:I:>> (I)'::f.-<-<(I)0Zm~~oO 'T10"'"T1'T1"T1C0~:X mmOOmmm~m-~< ::O~::O::O:::U:::U~~Z:::Ur> (I)-l:e::::'TI"T1.-.>~oo5 Q\t:::u>>:::u::o;:ux-o::u;::o (')o~:o:o~~~(')o~z~~ 00 -l mz ~ ~ OQ~~C~~-l~~ ::0 'T1m)<~~m(l)m)(>< a; mzo~mo~::u z 0 ~ m (") r- m ~ M~M~_M~~_ MMMMMMMMMMM~M~~MM "'MM~MM.wMi1JMMM ~ - -~ _~~t= ~ ~~N N~ ~ WWWOWNNa~~~O~ ~~OO(n(1l~W~~(n(1l(n~ .~.NO~~~~_go~(1IoooOOOOo~~o.oa 5g~gg8g~~~oggggggggggggmggg~ gggggggg8Sgggggggggggggggggg -:0 ~m~ :': ~a3 ~ ~- ~ '0'0 ':..,s,D. 0 00 g & 0 00 " 00 " 0 8..9 S _ M V> (f) (-t.' c.'> if. (f) l" (f, W If) ;p '.-' (fJ (.rJ '.1, {F' v', t, M-(I}MMClJtI')-(I}M-(I}tI')~UJ .. m " 0 .. ~ (,' u' " ~ " ~ " " a, OJ' .' a, 0' , :I: '" .. w u ": w .. " "' " '" u "' " ~ .. 0 0 , " " '" .. r:; 0 " " " '" c' .. '" '" " e- rn " " " , (') o 3 3 !j . , 10 "'-(I}_MUJ_tI')_~_tI')Mi1J~~M~UJUJi1Ji1JCIJ-(I}-(I}MM~M ClJMMMMM-(I}~MM~-(I) ~ - ...... ~ ~ ~ m _ ~~ ~ - ~ '" m ~ ~ ~ -" ~~ CDW: "'~ ., -... t :,. " '" mm gg ~~- - '" 0 '" u m 0 0 ~'" ",m 0 ~ ~ m m 0 ~ Co:"" gg !t~~ om " " '" " " " '" 0 m~ 00 0 0 m u 0 0 0 ~ '" ~ ~ :;: , , . . . . l>> o m . ~~~ _~.-..-._(11 g; ~ :t:C;;;;;;~c- o~wco. :....:....i<-J:..... ~.:::!'!::::!8 ~M~~M-(I}~_-(I}_~~MM~~~MM~~~-(I}~i1J~~~ WWUI~~ I"'Eoa, o "'_ o ~m 8g!S~ p 5; ~. ~ I .~ti h >!is I ~~~ o * Ii iH ~U ~ i 1< ~ f" f ~B I . ~ n" J " ~ M(1lMMCIJ(1l-(l}i1Ii1I(1l(Rtl9 -:0 ,. -::;: ~ ~ .-. ~o- ~.-. ~S'ii (n0ll~0-C' ~:e~~ ii' NP->Nlo ~~(\,)8 =~~ _........ ~N~ -::;: W~.~~(n ~NOOCON~~~w ~(n ~~lg~ggg88g.gg~k~~~g cO.O(1lwooooogoowo~~oo oo~6.~g' ooo6:....06NOO~06 oo.o..9~ 8000~OO~O$OOO W _"I\,) ~~eg .(J)o,m ~O-..JO 0ll00ll0 (,,00,0 00..98 m '" m ~ " o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ S~~~~~Q~~~~~~~~~r-@~~< ffi;~ca3mm~~~~n~~~ ~~~. 3~@~~~~~~~~~om~m ~~~~ II> -io~>>> -o'g,..,a ~ IO.~ cO. iT! ... U) (I) 0 . '''!!l. III l>> ~ ffi~~~~g ~ ~~ g ~f - ~ iPP, ~ ~I ~ ~~ (il !l III <; ~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ 0000 000000 ooogooo oo~o_oooooo__ooo(ilooo~ ~~~~Qooo===QQ===n===o ~wa.o~~o~(n~OO~~~~~~~* ~g~8 ~~~~~~ ~e~l>>e~~ 0ll01O~ om~m(n~ ~NN~~~O ~Cc~~~~~~~(I)~~O~~~m~"T1~ q ~(il.'O~~3~~~",om.~~c.-o ~~~.~~i~i~~t~~~lt.~~~ ~i~~~m~m~Sm~~ gm~ ~~ 0 ;::m~ ~..,..,..,~~'..,@W "..,"" ~.., l>>XS ~...--. _m ~=. ~~IO ~~>>(I)OO> ? ~~ ~~~ g~ ~~~~~g m 5"~ ~3b .10 ~~~I~~ lOa ~ ~il l!Uul! ;; , W iii o ~ !: ~ ~ -i ~ o oo~oa~ Cf'Cf'/,<{'CP&' (nO'lOi(,J(nO 851~::j~g 006~O~ ~ l/ 000 'P'P'P ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ m 5l~~~ ~&a....~ coo CD. i\ig::g!' .. 00 'Pr;a u~ ~o ~u "'~ V>0~\A~~if~W8'M0lf0WW~WffiW~ ;0 ~ . -< ~ h 3 ;;; 0 ~ . ~ h " ~ h "' ~ ~ "' ~ w u "' -. ~ 5 " :;: m 0' w u -, :,. "' ~ u " 0 Q:) is, ", -, .. m m ~ 0, w w .. c; " 0 m ~ w ,. 5 ~ u ~ w u w " ~ " w m ~ m w ", .. ;" m w 0 " ~ " '" N " U ", 0 ~ ~ .. " ~ " ~ " n W " " " " c 0 n "' 0 .' _-(I}"'MM-(I)~MM-Ut Mfn.-(l}fIIl~fIIlM"'MM ... .. coco ~~~~ ~(.) <obW~((l~ cow ......OUlO~Ul W~ IDO~N~CD :... N 0 eli-v 0. OJ en NO 00......0<00 ~ c !!. " uW (nQ: w m ~ ~ -0) '";..,J o 0 o 0 0. 0 o 0 ~ ,'" ~t ~ m u ~ -u 1611'A5 " o r' o m z " ii !i , m &~lJ'J '! Z ~ ~OC ~~:j "'..." ~ 0 o ,. -i o z i: rn .... c ~ " . 2- , c. c .. m We' ~a~ ~~li ~"''' ~ III o ~ 16 , 1 c.... A 5 .... (J) (J) (J) "tl "tl ;;:: ;;:: ;;:: ;;:: ^ c... ::> ::> :t :t :t "f1 "f1 "f1 "f1 0 0 ~. r!i" a C1> C1> ;0 "tl 0 0' 0' ~ n n n III .. a. III III III c: ~ Gl Gl Gl ::> ~ r c: =r ::> ::> ::> r iil ~ ~ 5' ::> ::> .. 3 ::> ::> ::> ;<' a: n !!l 0 C1> C1> m !;l 0 iil .. .. .. iil c: := .. C1> -l C1> !l c: c: c: P III III ~ c: ~ ::> C1> ::> iil iil iil ::> ::> '" iil n ~. ll<> ll<> ll<> .. ~ () =;- C1> ~ ~. a; ." ~ ;0 ~ (J) )> )> iJ:' 0 ~ -l 0 ll<> Gl !!l. . ;;;- . C1> e ~ .. .. ~ a . .. m ::> :;- .. .. .. (J) .. fC 0 ::> .. 0 0 0 C1> ::> ;0 ~ o. !!!. c: () ~ n f> f> <! .. C1> n ::> III !!!. ~. .. ~ .. .. "tl .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. <.n <.n 0 <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n 0 <.n <.n <.n a a a a a a a a a a a a [ a a a a a "tl a Gi a a a a a a Gi Gi a a a a a a ~ ~ C1> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::> ~ () a a a ~ ~ ~ () () ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N W .. '" <.n a N <.n ~ .. .. ~ "tl .. .. ~ (Xl a a. g ~ (Xl N (Xl ~ N Ml <.n '" ~ (Xl ~ '" ~ ~ ~. N '" .. ~ N N w .. w <.n (Xl (Xl a ~ a (Xl N (Xl <.n (Xl '" N N (Xl N a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ N ~ '" ~ ~ " ~ m .. 0 w ~ ~ N N 0 N j '" 0. m 6 N 0 ~ 0 w 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z w tll ~ W ~ m 0 .. '" .N ~ .. 'm 0 , ~ ~ w ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ m N m W ~ 0 ~ ~ j '" 6 j 0. '" 6 0 '" ill ~ 0 0 W 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ N ~ .N .~ ~ ~, '" '0 " N ~ ~ ~ m 0 j ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ m ~ j in '" 6 0 6 '" '.l '" m 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .N - .0 . "? w W ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 j '" 6 0. '" ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . " ~ -< ;; ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ j 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,. , ~ j 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" . ~ j 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ? ~ j 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !'- ~ j 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,. c ~ j 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [l' ~ -< ;; ~~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ N ~ ~ ~ N N W N W " '" "? " .. ;" ~ ~ '" " 'io t 0 ~ W 0 ~ 0 .. ~ 0 0 .. ~ i! ,., N ~ 0 N N m 0 0 W m ~ ~ ;: '" 6 6 ~ 0. in '" '" 6 "1 " '" 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ m .. j ~ g> ~ is: Iii ~! ~&.~ _~ c: 10 NWI: ~ !: o c ?iW;ee & 1'144<Jdate4 Landscape Architecture 16 r l'A5 January 12, 2010 Mr. Darryl Richard, Project Manager Collier County Transportation Alternative Transportation Modes 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Subject: Proposal of Landscape Architectural Services for Golden Gate M.S.T.U. Roadway Beautification Project (From Coronado Parkway & Hunter Blvd.). Change Order #2 -P0#4500107120 Additional Services for Landscape Architect, & Engineering. Project Name: Coronado Parkway & Hunter Blvd. Landscape, Irrigation & Curbing Final Design Services) 2009-003C02 Dear Mr. Richard: As requested McGee & Associates is providing the following services fee estimate addressing the curbing andtor curbing and landscaping modification. Once the committee has determined the direction that they wish to proceed we will prepare an official change order request. Estimated Additional Services 1) Modify existing 60% plans 24" width curbing to 16" width curbing pavers to remain per 60% plan layout. Engineering sub-consultants fees: $3,000.00 Landscape Architect fees: No additional fees or 2) Modify exsisting 60% plans 24"width curbing to 16" width curbing pavers to be reduced and landscape and irrigation added. Engineering sub-consultants fees: $4,000.00 Landscape Architect fees: $3,500.00 Additional services number 2 would require 30 additional working days added to the design schedule. ~ Design * Environmental Management * Planning * Arborist 5079 Tamiami Trail East I P. O. Box 8052 Naples. Florida 34101 Phone (239) 417.0707. Fax (239) 417.0708 LC 098. FL 1023A .._---_.._~...,.~,...._...~ 1611 A .. \ -" ~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 4055' A VENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239-261-4007 O@l[fi)@]@@@l[W@ @l~@[}oO~@@~g@ aO@O@] ~@[W@~~ .. COPY TO: [gJ OWNER 0 ARCHITECT 0 ENGINEER 0 CONSULTANT [gJ MSTU Committee PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: Golden Gate MSTU Hannula Landscaping - Jim Stephens REPORT NUMBER: JRL COMM No: 3 09018 Dates: 01/05/10 01/08/10 Times: 12 -I :OOpm 8:30-1 0:30am Weather: Partly cloudy Sunny Low 60s Low 60s Estimate % Complete: NIA Temp Range: Schedule Unknown Conformance: PRESENT: 01/05/10 Andrew Eisele & David Cosslett Andrew Eisele. Darryl Richard, & Jim Stephens WORK IN PROGRESS: Workers present - trash pickup, weeding, planting. fertilization. etc. OBSERVATIONS: General Conditions - Landscape Maintenance Review Alternative plant recommendations and design of medians. REVIEWS: REPORT: Review of Golden Gole MSTU Requests - Discussion of JRL creating a "Wish List" of recommendations tor the replacement of struggling plant species in the MSTU medians. Quantities to be determined and field verified by Landscape Architect. (In Progress) Areas Covered (01/05/10 & 01108/10): I. Golden Gate Parkway (from Santa Barbara to Collier Blvd) 2. Sunshine Boulevard 3. Collier Blvd I CR 951 (from southern sign to northern sign) 4. Tropicana Blvd 5. Median on 18'h Ave at 40'h Terrace 6. Median on 18'h PI at Sunset Rd 7. Median on Greene Blvd at Collier Blvd . ~ Included in Maintenance Report presented by JRL Design on 12/08/09 Area 1: Golden Gale Parkway . Crepe Myrtle are competing with canopy trees and Sabol Palms. JRL recommends seed pod removal. thinning, lowering. and proper pruning to take place in fall/winter months to encourage new growth and blooming. as well as. to reduce the competition between species. Work is in progress. . Fill in Indian Hawthorne in tirst median west of Collier Blvd (951). . Evaluation of juniper beds to continue. Recommendations will be made on a case-by-case basis to either replace completely or fill as necessary. . . Foxtail Palms west of new pedestrian bridges are yellowing and have been treated by Hannula - JRL will continue to monitor. 10 11 A 5 ~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 4055' A VENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239-261-4007 DESIGN . . Dry Spots present at eastern end of Parkway (near Golden Gate Country Club) (Due to Pump being down - Pump replacemenf scheduled for December 12, 2009) - JRL will continue to monitor. . Ernpfy spots in Fakahatchee Grass Beds to be filled in with new or replaced per JRL's recommendation. . Sword Fern bed has had dead foliage removed but now looks bare. Remove and replace with Flax Lily. Hannula to provide proposal. Hannula is consistent about maintaining plantings in Sife Lines at 24" in all areas. JRL will confinue to monitor. . . . Area 2: Sunshine Boulevard . . Dead Plumbago removal in progress; replacement needed. According to Hannula's Reports remaining plants have been sprayed with pesticide: showing little signs of recovery. JRL recommends 'Big Red' Crown of Thorns to replace Plumbago. Hannula to provide proposal. . . Crepe Myrtle recommendations: Seed pod removal. fertilization. thinning. and proper pruning to take place in falllwinter months to encourage new growth and blooming. Work is in progress. Area 3: Collier Boulevard (from western sign to eastern sIgn) . West of GG Pkwy on median tips. Yellow Crown of Thorn appears unhealthy and void of any new leaf growth. Hannula has fertilized. JRL will continue to monitor. . Bougainvillea on southwest side of median west of GG Pkwy are showing signs of stress and appear very thin/unhealthy. Hannula has fertilized. JRL will continue to monitor. . Evaluation of juniper beds to continue. Recommendations will be made on a case-by-case basis to either replace completely or fill as necessary. . . Removal of dead plants and weeds from Dune Sunflower beds has been completed. Empty. bare spaces may be in need of replanting for more immediate affect. . . Crepe Myrtle are competing with Sabol Palms. JRL recommends seed pod removal. thinning. lowering. and proper pruning to take place in falllwinter months to encourage new growth and blooming, as well as. to reduce the competition between species. Work is in progress. . . JRL to recommend alternative plant option for junipers in wet location at the 17th Ave intersection. Hannula has removed struggling juniper. Research is in progress for alternative plant types. . . Dead plants in Plumbago beds need to be replaced: dead branches to be pruned. Potential replacement per JRL's recommendations. Area 4: Troplcana Boulevard . Live Oak near school appears to have been recently hit causing a large wound in the trunk's bark and needs monitoring and possible treatment. . Cassia leaning into roadway is competing with Sabals and shall be removed. Hannula to review contract for debris removal for certain sizes of tree and provide quote if applicable. . Planting design has been completed (01/08/1 0) for entire stretch of Tropicana Blvd's medians. Hannula to revise and resubmit proposal. Area 5: Median on 18th Ave at 40th Terrace . Regular maintenance completed. JRL will continue to monitor. ~ 16' 1 A 5 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 5" AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES. FLORIDA 239-261-4007 Area 6: Median on 18th PI at Sunset Rd. . Regular maintenance completed. JRL will continue to monitor. Area 7: Median on Greene Blvd at Collier Blvd . Planting design has been completed (01 lOBI 10) for entire stretch of Tropicana Blvd's medians. Hannula to revise and resubmit proposal. ACTION REQUIRED: Review report for actions required. Reported by: Andrew Eisele. ASLA. registered landscape architect David Cosslett. professional associate <D TrC>~ e'~. fllWool.b'1- ~ r.....i.. F~\\ .:c,.. f'A~' . . fIll """ ~a..\L ,,-~ -tD. tee-wl\ '.0.1", fil'l\( eo.cf ill'" G..r. . t:Ie.... i - Z9~ ~e.. ~.W 4" 16 11 .A 5 ~ , q - 1J <' - Z"S pI,. t;w > ~r(JW"" .,;. ~1I'1I\ 6M1n i ClIWM. of ~ \rlM.\&..~1 ~. (1'0 n~n) . . rLl\ """ f<<..~ I.tI:4eL~ f~U. ~ Fa.(L~ c..c."" e~ F-o~c. . Flwt. ~ e.o."('. \b ytfla.te f4:. ~ ~ ~ . F~lC LJ; -\Cl rtplau fAJ'. ~u ~$ e . liT. .n 'f(' (,.u,. I '(or", - - @ ~ ~D pI. ~~~.j . 1611 . ~~ 1~1f''' w/ irot'auu. ~lu~ .}WI\;~ IN (! vel . I'J"I fLt). c. ,.1'" . ~. 0.1'. dfW\i ~ f~l' ~ f~ ~lCl'Jt. ~ . po., \At4. ~IW\. W I , . . fIn" Co.cl ' Go .0.1".. ~I.u. I YAtrq r.qltu. J~ tAI/6; I2d t.o. T. 'll F~ Fill .;. ~I.c.e. I ~<<q hIC- ~{rrfq.(il., f!epla.lJe ~,.,ttir, w ~ I r;t\Q (;.o.T". e~ p.d wi ~., ~ ~,,'r ~ . Fta.1- ~ a;u .;,.. f4a;k . , . ~ . D.T. f"""'- CAd' C....T ~ ~ l}tl~ ",/ ~; (ld C.l)'" N ." Fin ~ fa.l @ 1rO'I~ &\'J~. ~ ~I 'It 1M, ~\V ~ , .' ~Pl\' c.. Oft'. oo.ll tw\r4~ FIG.l' ~ ~ 1J .~ ~ CD . · l- &r'~" . , - .. ... ~u.ll.t"il r&. ! flca,}( w., ~irt. 04.... ( , I denni C.O.T. ~o pL SW4 ( N .". ---16 11 A 5 ~ 31.D.V& ' .> S~ ~.O.T. d...i , ., f'~\t.~ IJIlt. fla.v e)6, ~. ~ "'QIiIl.oI fi '=- ); - '" , ~ S -t.""-'\M J Sed +-- '31 s+ o.lJo(. C;W -> ~ree~ 8lv4- . <.-- 1611 A 5 . CoUttr I\v" -> (r~~&. 1040\\'1 ire6) + .a. " d .f ....., f\~ rltl:fJ~ ~.D..,. FI..v: W, <<<N ,. . I l!1'IiW'l of ~ tJ'* ~IQ~ " , C-o.T. ~ Coronado and Hunter Median Improvement Plans 60% Opinion of Probable for Paver, Curbing and Landscape Changes 16 , I A5 Coronado Pkwy. Median 14 Pavers per 60% plans, 24" F Curb ITEM No. DESCRIPTION 1 PLANrS AN D MULCH 2 SUBSOIL EXCAVAflON 3 PREPARED SOIL LAVER, SPECIAL DEPrH 4 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTIER TYPE F 5 PAVERS, ARCHITECTURAL 6 IRRIGAflON Total Cost for Median 14 9,00 60,00 2,358,00 4,860.00 Reduced Pavers, 16" F curb, Landscaping, Irrigation QTY. Unit Price Cost 1 $ 3,043.50 $ 17 $ 7.50 $ 34 $ 16.50 $ 262 $ 8,00 $ 18 $ 60.00 $ 1 $ 3,422.00 $ $ 3,043.50 127.50 561.00 2,096,00 1,080,00 3,422,00 10.330,00 NOTE5, 1. In the 16" width curbing and landscape analysis the pavers are reduced to a 14 foot length from the median end. 2. The project with the reduced pavers and curbing would increase the overall project costs between 34 to 43 percent. UNIT QTY. Unit Price LS 1 $ CV 0 $ 7.50 CV 0 $ LF 262 $ SV 81 $ LS 0 $ Cost '. ~ 8 ~ ~ 'E 'c !~ of ~ , " u" -5 " 8g~8~ ..0";";0"'; ~ ::;pg g ~ ~~;U"l~~- ~ N ~ . ii: E8 E 5 ~ B e .= e-'@ - 0 ~ ~ ]:g ~~ go x " o ] :[ 00 1i!" " 0 o ~ 5 u ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~5~N~. $8 > . ~ ~ . ~ . z"" ~~ " u ~ "5 ffi ~ :~ c z ~ ~ ~ " u ~ i< " o z '5 ~ ~ I " 5 . ~ li . '" 16 I 1 A 5 g~ .oM ~ N '" ~ ~ ~ . 0. ~ ~ . o ~ ,5 o . . .~ . " o ~ ~ . D . :c ~ ~ > . ~ ~ " . 8. l: of a ~ . 8- e ~ . oS ~ " ~ '5 o E ~ o ~ . ~ ~ o ~ . ~ .. ~ ~ . ~ , ~ . ~ ,c . 8 . oS ~ ~ , D II . ~ . 1i ]; s . " ~ . li . li " 11 ~ . :c ~ ~ ~ o z 16 11 A 5 "F" or "D" curb per F.D.O.T "Roadway and Traffic Design Standards" Index #300, 91/96 e~ Ehe most current edition. Decorative Paving Medians 6 feet or under in width, concrete separators, and medians adjacent to turn lane stack areas shall be paved with decorative concrete interlocking pavers (See Figure ~16) . The paver pattern shall simulate a cobblestone pattern made up of a mix of three different paver sizes. The colors shall be dark emerald green and cream. The percentage ratio for each paver color shall be one third. The pavers shall be equivalent to Krehling Industries, Inc.'s Kobblestone interlocking pavers consisting of in 1/3 Dark emerald #80, 1/3 Green #79 and 1/3 Creme II #56 or approved equal. 6 2 Roadway and Pedestrian Decorative Lighting Ua~e" 12th, 1997 The reaa aJ light:iag skall esasiat: af ljEeeR alJlJ.Eelja'Ee eenSre'E6 taeles .lit.li 'tuin aT Biag-Ie lJEeell eelsreel fintl:lEee aRa aBftS. The eaBezete aliall Be eels.Eeel emeralEi ljEesR te mateR tke aeeeEati"Je paveE ealer. The pales shall Be eeta~eR in saapes aRa Be aiEee~ Burial aRa/er aaehsE easea t)~e pales. In SEaer te maintain the F.B.G.T. miRim~ a~eEalJe light le~els af 1.3 feet saRales aIsal] t.he .Eesa. 'the fintl:iree uill flees tie Be 299 te 229 feet: 8ft eel'l.:e.eE_ Roadway: There shall be two types of roadway/street lighting recommended for the M.S.T.U. Golden Gate Master Plan "Special Overlay District" Polc....:..._'\Jnersen CaRt. v}:SEa:cy seEies ljEeea & Fixture: Collier County Traffic Operations "East Trail Street Light Assembly" (Lumec 250 watt metal halide, DMS30 LMSl1684A, Type Al, Drawing No. CCTO 03-204 M.S.T.U. Roadways Pole: Green toned exposed aggregate anchor based or embedded, topped with a round pole single or double 6 foot fixture arm,_color forest ~reen. Fixture: Lumec Se"~ede~ Helios series H.B.M.,_forest green ~olor, or approved equal. F.D.O.T. minimum average light levels of 1.5 initial foot candles along the road shall be maintained. The pedestrian lighting shall be a decorative pole and fixture. The color shall be one or a 5-3 pedestrian scaled combination of the 03/1997 01/2009 ro-rrfl . . , . . . . . .. .. , . .' - 0 - - .- ill > . . ~r "" '. .- ?'.M>'~ ?I~~ !'t.mj. ,. ...... .... ;. . .:- . <U ,11 ., II 01 I I L- d)..J.. ~}oJ.. .dN- 0 . 0 ....... Q) . \t 0 "" ~ ~ ciS . I'~ % I Q) f ~~ C \- ,~ 0-5~ . I It') . . . 16 r 1 AS The installation of proposed pathway facilities should be planned and be included in future roadway beautification projects. Coordination with the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization pathways Work program and Advisory Committee will provide assistance and possible funding for pathways. Several of the M.S.T.U. roadways are shown in the FY 95/96 to FY 99/00 pathway work program (See Appendix E). This should be updated annually. Pa~hwavs Facili~v Desian S~andar4sl Due to the large amount of lineal feet and overall lack of facilities within the M.S.T.U. roadways it is recommended to use asphalt type facilities. The implementation of the "Uncurbed Roads /In-road pathways Pavement Concepts" (See Figure 23 6. 24), would shorten the time frame of installation. Installation should be incorporated, budgeted and scheduled with Collier County road resurfacing plans and schedules. The minimum width of a one way pedestrian/bicycle facility concrete or asphalt should be 4.5 feet. The minimum width of a two way asphalt or concrete facility should be 8 feet. Pede.~rian Crosswalk Markina All pedestrian crosswalk locations should be designated with the international pattern of alternating white bars running parallel with the roadway (See Figure 27). CurbinG Median curbing shall be concrete (6) six vertical face Type "F" or "D" curb per F.D.O.T "Roadway and Traffic Design Standards" Index #300, 01/95 or the most current edition. Decora~ive pavina Medians 6 feet or under in width, concrete separators, and medians adjacent to turn lane stack areas shall be paved with decorative concrete interlocking pavers (See Figure 28). The paver pattern shall simulate a cobblestone pattern made up of a mix of three different paver sizes. The colors shall be dark emerald green and cream. The percentage ratio for each paver color shall be one third. The pavers shall be equivalent to Krehling Industries, Inc.'s Kobblestone interlocking pavers consisting of in 1/3 Dark emerald #80, 1/3 Green #79 and 1/3 Creme II #56 or approved equal. 5-2 March 12th, 1997 -_'_'--"~_'..._..,.,~-,--,-~.~_..~_.......~_.,-~~_." UI I. '" ~ j t It r ~ \r.; t Tr o c: ., C" CD c. 2. ., :J r ~. ~ CD ~ QO A o. ~ CD (') o ., ~ ..... -. .< CD ""U ~ , < -. :J .co o CD ..... S>> -. - s z i - z ~~ 'J3 ~ \"" i ~ ~- ~. z-t, j'1 ~~ ~ ~ 1::1 ~ i. g ~ ~. i ~ ~. "",g. i ~)o>. ~! ~ ~ ...... "'('(Po 10' . " '.' .... 'eu I..., ILl......... -:.: LANe ..... !~ ':. ~.... :'. III ~1I1.' ~ ,. 1- J!f'. ~; ':'" ~5-"'~. ". ~ ::....~ . .\ .\. ); .. '. . . . o ORIGINAL '. . 1"fP. '1yp. II'.. II' 1l?A1"f'1 c.. 1lWF1 c.. . l-ANJ:!. LANe. 16 r 1 ".~ j \\'I o iI ~ ~ -\ . " . 00,. . . .. :. . ., ..': ~ ,., ." tOIl ~I Figure 16 ! '-' - J , .. . .. .2 - .- ~ .. .... . <( Q) : . ~ .': % 0 I. . \ ."a~ 0) ..... '. -"if ~ c:: .. . I of .- '. .~ ;:.~i iR > ~ I CL Q) ~N"'1 :;:IN't1 1iN't1 '> > '. '- ?,.l:fot;JJ. ?ldr:I~ I'raru. :"', . .... ........ CO ,'I ,II ,01 ~ :dAJ- ~N- ~>J.. 0 0 ~ Q) . ;t- O -.S\ ~ ,J\ r ~ ;Z. ""~ i ~~ Q) f c:: .... ~ i ?ll CO ~ -.J I: a ~ i1 ~ ~ ~ ~l c:: ~ ~ I\. ... 'll,Jj ~ 0 i II} of Z ~ -~ ~ "0 t.: t/. Q) ?:~ ..c z ~ ~ ;:) ~ () Ii ~ 5-12 03/1997 01/2009 _'__'_""_~'_"""_____~M"'m. . ..,~."..__, T , -- m .. ~ I 161 t 1 'ff/.";'". 1 ~....'lA' r....~....... j-M:u:.-zN__-1 1'(t.....,.., '" I i . I i r ,,1 I I III I " ...~~ a/ . . , f~~ ; i '~ " I II I IF ~ i,: I~ F '" '!i o' ~... iI ~ ,"- ~ . ~ l~ m i It. i c ~ ~ p~~ ~ < c ~ . . . o ."-r en . CD I !l o' !~ ::> ~ >- p '" I >- "'I; ! ~ " ~ Ig I ~ ! ~ t ll! ~ ~ I ~f J 11 e=e < co ! :l! J :~ al - l l < K i I il o' L ~ ::> 11 - t: l!l \ I il! I n a . r 21 o' 0 :> ~ ~ Ii . f ~ ... ! I J Il IIIf . i !. l I ~. } ~ I ill " jlh , " gl IH -t '- '. I KI ;t. i~ l I II! i ,~ I I i' II I f ~i <-- ----., E in~flil Q ji J ~u I! --"'- -....-..-----....-.. . , ' r~~1 ~ ff md~rr & 1\s1iociatrs ~;( I-'~ --I _ GoIlIldDlillIlslri:l I~ ..-,--,..--....-...--"-----"'-- -----_._--~ ,----_._--'---~ -._"^--~.~._--- ---~----,_.._,~-_._......_--_.._-,. 16 I 1 \~ ~ ~ ((" ., .. I" ._~ "<,"_ ifftU ;fi!!;.',_:F~4!"'''''''''''1 {co:- ~:~i...,' ',' ;Jtj '~"i;jjWk;~ .. ':;;~ '. ,,:;- ~. .'I,,'"l_;': ~ IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION ~.T.U. JJd~' ADVISORY COMMITTEE Halas. 4~ CENEO Hennmg / E '0 NOHmber 18,200'1 Coyle J ~\ (.([: FEB 2 5 20 Coletta " \ cornrnissioners soare 01' coun V AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes - October 28, 2009 V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget - Caroline Soto B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard VI. Transportation Maintenance Report - ClM VII. landscape Architect Report A. Maintenance Report- JRL Design VIII. Community Redevelopment Agency IX. Code Enforcement Report - Weldon Walker X. Old Business A. Main Street Pedestrian Zoning-Hwy29 and Loop Rd.- Darryl Richard XI. New Business XII. Public Comment XIII. Adjournment The next meeting is December 16,2009 Immokalee Community Park 321 First Street South, Immokalee, FL Misc. Cones: Date: 0 1-; { ').3 J I D ltem#: [!aIL l)A-0 ",' ",~r;s !o 1611A6 "'l , ~t - _~...~ ,~. 'ic::~ ~;-..' :~~-"''''''''''.''''I I,'%:'" fr.Y;" I. ",'~ ;J~ f I.',,\,~ ~ "'" . "",7'. '~'<,.J: r ~ IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMITTEE October 28, 2009 Minutes I. The meeting was called to order by William Deyo at 4:40 p.m. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: William Deyo, Cherryle Thomas (Excused), Lucy Ortiz, Andrea Halman (Excused), Carrie Williams County: Darryl Richard - Project Manger, Tessie Sillery-Operations Coordinator Others: Richard Tindell-JRL, Jim Fritchey-Commercial Land Maintenance, Darlene Lafferty-Mancan III. Approval of Agenda Change: Move VI. Transportation Maintenance Report to IV. A. Move Vll. Landscape Architect Report to IV. B. Subsequent agenda items were renumbered Lucy Ortiz moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by Carrie Williams. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. IV. Approval of Minutes: September 23,2009 Carrie Williams moved to approve the September 23, 2009 minutes as submitted. Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. A. Transportation Maintenance Report-CLM Jim Fritchey reported the following: o Performing ongoing maintenance o All Palms were trimmed o Removed (2) dead Foxtails (Main Street) and pavers were inserted o (2) additional Foxtails are declining (due to lack of nutrients and water) Darryl Richard gave additional information: o Staff will assess (2) declining Foxtails o Staff will coordinate with the Electrician as additional Palm removal may be required for Electrical System repairs o (7) Palms were removed and replaced with pavers o Electrical boxes were located under Palm Trees B. Landscape Architect Report-JRL Richard Tindell reported on photos included in his report: (See attached) Photo #2 o Recommended cutting down overgrown plant material as it poses a site line issue Photo #3 o Immokalee sign was painted and repaired o Noted dead plant materials located in front of the sign Photo #4 o Requested CLM line trim grass on west side of Main Street (near north end construction) 16'IA6 " Darryl Richard suggested adding an Alternate (list) to the Maintenance Contract to edge and mow (2 ft. strip) behind the sidewalk. Photo #5 o 9 t011 Banners are missing o Parts are missing on half of the 9 t011 banners o Several street lights are missing parts Darryl Richard noted wrong parts were received for Street Light repairs. Photo #8 o Crape Myrtles require trimming of dead branches Photos #7 and #8 o Vehicle damage to Crown of Thorn o Valve boxes are functional but are unkempt Darryl Richard suggested including an additional Alternate to the Maintenance Contract to maintain the concrete portion of sidewalks. Lucy Ortiz questioned if replacing the damaged Crown of Thorn was recommended. Discussions ensued and was determined the Crown of Thorn replacement is covered under Fund 111 however requires approval due to Budget constraints. The Committee requested Budgeting monies for incidentals due to unforeseen situations. Staff will provide the Budget amount for incidentals from (3) previous Fiscal Years at the November meeting. Photo #10 o Plants are nutrient deficient o Suggested a topical application of Sulfur Photo #11 o Compacted soil along the curb (Main Street) requires immediate attention as it is a trip hazard directly into traffic lane Photo #12 o Grate(s) require Mechanical attention due to lodged grass and debris 2 16 I 1 1A 6 Staff will obtain permission from Road and Bridge to use dirt from County soil stock pile to repair safety hazard of median (curb lip) along Main Street. A labor Proposal was requested from ClM for the November meeting. Photo #14 o Sidewalk lip is exposed and requires filling as it is a trip hazard directly into traffic lane Photo #16 o Cemetery requires grooming and it is uncertain who is responsible to maintain it o The Cemetery is a historical site and Holy ground Darryl Richard will determine who is responsible to maintain the Cemetery and report to the Committee at the November meeting. William Deyo moved to ask staff look at prices to possibly maintain up to 2 ft. back from sidewalk and pressure wash the concrete part of the sidewalk. Second by Carrie Williams. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. Carrie Williams moved to clear cut (plant material on) the comer (picture #2 Main and 1st Street) Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. It was suggested for JRl to create 2 separate work orders for Refurbishment Design on 1st Street and Highway 29. After much discussion it was determined coordination with the CRA is necessary. Carrie Williams moved to request JRL bring back to the Committee 2 separate Proposals for Landscape Refurbishment on Hwy 29 and 1st Street. Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget - Caroline Soto Darryl Richard reviewed the following Budget items. (See attached) Fiscal Year end September 30, 2009 Report o Capital Outlay spent $1,273,500.32 o FOOT reimbursement received $300,000.00 o Remaining available Operating Expense $23,207.27 o Carry Forward Report will be provided at the November meeting o JRl is under line item Other Contractual o ClM Maintenance Contract is paid by Fund 111 B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard reviewed the following (See attachments) (IMM-16) Edaerrin James Sian o JRl will provide sketches for the Edgerrin James Sign (IMM-15) LA Maintenance Consultina o Suggested consideration to extend JRl Contract until refurbishment of Irrigation and landscaping on Hwy 29 and 1st Street is complete. 3 -'----_..__.~.... .----~'----'.,..".._..._."~,,---- 161 I ~A6 Carrie Williams moved to request Staff look at extending the Contract until Irrigation and Refurbishment of Landscaping for Main Street and Hwy 29 is done. Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. Dedication Sians o Lykins estimate $2,750.00 to refurbish 22 signs ($125.00 per sign) o 2 Placards are missing o It was suggested to replace the 2 missing signs and to read "Funded by Immokalee MSTU" After much discussion it was agreed by the Committee to request quote for 24 "new" signs. Carrie Williams moved to approve and not to exceed $3,000.00 for 24 new signs. Second by William Deyo. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. VI. Community Redevelopment Agency-None VII. Code Enforcement Report - Weldon Walker-None VIII. Old Business A. Main Street Pedestrian Zoning - HWY29 and Loop Rd. - Darryl Richard- None IX. New Business A. Meeting schedule-November and December 2009 The November meeting date was changed to November 18, 2009 due to the Thanksgiving holiday. Staff will confirm if the meeting can be held at One Stop due to conflicting activities at Immokalee Community Park and MSTU scheduled meeting times. William Deyo moved to approve the November meeting date be moved to November 18, 2009 at 4:30 p.m. Second by Carrie Williams. Discussions developed on December meeting date. It was agreed to meet December 16, 2009. Motion was amended to include: and December 16, 2009 for the December meeting. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. X. Public Comment - None There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:55 PM. 4 16 11 . A 6 Immokalee Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee Ut( These minutes approved by the Committee on as presented X or amended 1',2/'10 The next regularly scheduled meeting is November 18,20094:30 p.m. Immokalee Community Park 321 First Street South Immokalee, FL 5 16 I 1. A 6 I IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMITTEE ~~C:.'I SQe G9 ~. October 28, 2009 ''I7o'Co"~,,, ~ .} ~ ~b "'''Q:~ SUMMARY OF MINUTES AND MOTIONS "'~, O.I'Jl.9~ III. Approval of Agenda Change: Move VI. Transportation Maintenance Report to IV. A. Move VI!. Landscape Architect Report to IV. B. Subsequent agenda items were renumbered Lucy Ortiz moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by Carrie Williams. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. IV. Approval of Minutes: September 23, 2009 Carrie Williams moved to approve the September 23, 2009 minutes as submitted. Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. A. Landscape Architect Report-JRL Richard Tindell reviewed several photo in his report and recommended cutting down overgrown plant material in photo #2 as it poses a site line issue Darryl Richard suggested adding an Alternate (list) to the Maintenance Contract to edge and mow (2 ft. strip) behind the sidewalk and maintain concrete portion of sidewalks. William Deyo moved to ask staff look at prices to possibly maintain up to 2 ft. back from sidewalk and pressure wash the concrete part of the sidewalk. Second by Carrie Williams. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. Carrie Williams moved to clear cut (plant material on) the corner (picture #2 Main and 1st Street.) Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. It was suggested for JRL to create 2 separate work orders for Refurbishment Design on 1st Street and Highway 29. After much discussion it was determined coordination with the eRA is necessary_ Cerrie Williams moved to request JRL bring back to the Committee 2 separate Proposals for Landscape Refurbishment on Hwy 29 and 1st Street Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. 16 I 1 A 6 V. Transportation Services Report B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard suggested consideration to extend JRL Contract until refurbishment of Irrigation and Landscaping on Hwy 29 and 1st Street is complete. Carrie Williams moved to request Staff look at extending the Contract until Irrigation and Refurbishment of Landscaping for Main Street and Hwy 29 is done. Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. Dedication Sions Lykins estimate $2,750.00 to refurbish 22 signs ($125.00 per sign) was reviewed. After much discussion it was agreed by the Committee to request quote for 24 "new" signs. Carrie Williams moved to approve and not to exceed $3,000.00 for 24 new signs. Second by William Deyo. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. VII. New Business A. Meeting schedule-November and December 2009 The November meeting date was changed to November 18, 2009 due to the Thanksgiving holiday. Staff will confirm if the meeting can be held at One Stop due to conflicting activities at Immokalee Community Park and MSTU scheduled meeting times. William Deyo moved to approve the November meeting date be moved to November 18, 2009 at 4:30 p.m. Second by Carrie Williams. Discussions developed on December meeting date. It was agreed to meet December 16, 2009. Motion was amended to include: and December 16, 2009 for the December meeting. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. 16' 1 A6 ~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 4055- A VENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239-261-4007 O@ITD@]@@@~@ @[p@[}uol1@@119@ 1Jo@O@] [P@~@~ COpy TO: ~ OWNER D ARCHITECT D ENGINEER D CONSULTANT ~ _MSTU Committee_ PROJECT: Immokalee MSTU - PO# 4500105395 CONTRACTOR: CLM REPORT NUMBER: JRL COMM No: 14 9003 Date: 9/23/09 & 10/14/09 Time: 1 :30 - 3 pm Weather: Scattered Clouds Temp Range: 93 Estimate % Complete: N/A Schedule Conformance: As scheduled PRESENT: Commercial Maintenance, D. Richards (Sept) & Richard Tindell (both) WORK IN PROGRESS: Contractor present. clean up 9/23 clean up complete, brick work in progress 10/14 OBSERV ATIONS: Routine maintenance work has been performed REVIEWS: New specifications were reviewed at a special meeting 10/9/09 REPORT: Pre MSTU meeting inspection w D. Richards was routine. Questions were raised again about scope and area to be maintained. Reviewed damage to north sign. Discussed sight line and irrigation issues. Project Manager to verify who is responsible for this area. Routine maintenance work has been performed and service personnel were absent, paver repair crew was on site (photo # 1). Trimming of plant material at southwest corner of First and Main was discussed as a health safety issue. ClM agreed to correct immediately - that correction has not been done as of 10/14 (see photo 2). Monument sign at north end was defaced and has been repaired. Note there are dead/missing junipers in front of the sign which should be replaced (.see photo 3). All in all, the routine work appears on Main south of 9th and along 1't west of Main, appears to be in conformance to agreement and schedule except for some remedial work that has been previously reported. Grass trimming in some areas has been repeatedly missed along the outside edges of the roadway. The FOOT sign on the west side of Main 161 1 A6 " ~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 4055- A VENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239-261-4007 Street is an extreme example (see photo 4). Approximate nine banners are still missing on lamp pales along both Main and First (see photo 5) Crape Myrtle tree have many dead branches which should be removed (see photo 6) Vehicular damage to plantings still needs to be replaced (see photos 7.8 & 9) Many of the plants showed signs of nutrienf disfress (they need to be fertilized see photo 10)) Soil level remains low in many places pedestrians cross the highway creating a health and safety issue (see photo 11) Trash can pickup seemed in good order although several containers seem damaged and in general the site looked. respectable. Many light poles and fixtures are still awaiting repair. Landscape debris was found in the roadway along with dust and dirt, especially at the drainage grates (see photo 12) Irrigation coverage is spotty, turf has not been installed to reduce bed areas creating as un cared for appearance (see photo 13) Missing grates and trip hazards remain along sidewalks (see photo 14) Palm trees still need to be trimmed and dead/dying plants removed (see photo 15) The Historic cemetery plot along Main look neglected (see photo 16) The consultant's report provides information to the County and the MSTU Board to help them make informed decisions and issue appropriate directives. Representative photos are submitted to make the report clearer and convey some information better. ACTION REQUIRED: Request more direction from County and MSTU Board. Reported by: Richard Tindell, asia, registered landscape architect LA767 o w , U1 W U1 tv -0 lJ) c. o ~ , U1 W Ol ~ '0 lJ) c. J ;; .I ~ '. , !. t. " ';; ",; \ \, ,",' I i " if l I ' J ' fPJ J l' .1 ,. 1 ~ t o ~ , U1 ~ W '0 lJ) C. ~ o "'" , ()1 w . w OJ '0 '" 0. 161 , . ~:,:~ ~.".. ,-"> ,,',.,' t,I',' /' { , I . , ,I o cp ()1 W ~ '0 '" 0. ,., to: Ii i I ~ ~ , U1 W ~ U1 '0 VI Q. ~ t-.) , U1 ~ .... '0 ~ :,~\~ "<~:~?:;.:\:, . , ,.,Jr.'I' J,l,'t'<~."\::}'.;:". t," \,'".:t.,4' , ': , .. ';;.~~J~i{~~: ,t" ',\y~ _.~- ,,~..~-",._~--~..._. ..".-....-.-" '-""'."~..,""~.~.,~_, ""r"_.M_""~~';'"" ~"_.'~~....".'''''" \ o (0 , U1 W .... ~ '0 VI Q. ~ o , U1 w 0> .... '0 VI Q. lo.. ....~.w.JrJ _, ~ I ~ ()1 , ()1 w ()1 o "Cl U> a. ~ ./l. , ()1 w OJ o "Cl U> a. :;) I- '" rn g :eNN W'" ~~ ~~ 0"" :e ~ .,; N ~ Cl> ..c o - u o m :a_ m m =(5 ~I- ... MN ON r--: M .. '" N ~ '" o I!:? '" .. ~ ~ ~ ~ '" o !:? l~. 1 A6 .... I 000 ",00 o:i ci M '" 0 '" '" "' 0 t~ e. i8C;; ..; ci a:i NO'" ~ 0 g~ci !!!. o '" o N ci M o _ N '" ..; ~ g g g g g 8 g g g ~ g g g g ~ g ~ g g ~ o ci 0 6 6 6 ci ci ~ N 0 6 6 6 M 6 co? 6 6 ~ NOOOOOO NNDOOOOOOOON co I.I) 0.0 0 (0 Il:!. N O. ('<) 0) 0> l"-- r-- ~ r.o '<t N N It) ~~~ Nci~ggg~~~~m~g~ '" '" .. 00 ON OM ~o u>1li o e. ~~$~~~~~~~~~W~~WWWWWWWW~WWWWWWWWW~ r-- N r-.. (C 0 CJ) ~ .- I"') co ~ ~ ~ gg ~ ~I:: !:?I!:? w ~ fti.a .a:c u c ... ~ a. x w 0<0 "' ~ o:i cO '" '" et:. o <D 0 (,D 0 ..". 0 0> ci cO ci 0) 0 co N N~:ri~ 00'" 000 c:i ll'i M '" '" '" ~ 0)"" N N uS ~ WWfI)OOWWWYJ-ffl""'WtflWW w 'E ~ S 'E E o u ;; ill '" "' .. '" '" .. .., ,..: ~ <D ill '" "' wwwwwwwww......wwwwwwww... '" "' '" '" o o 6 o o 0" ~ o o 6 .. "' o .., .. ,..: '" '" .; "' "' '" WWWWfohWWWWtl'tWWI.AV) '" ~i c'" ~ . Em ... " o 0" o "' '" o !:? " o 6 o "' '" o I!:? .., .. ,..: .... '" .; on Wv)v)0v)v)v)WW"'~WWWWWWWW'" 000000 000000 Ot":iOMMO OOlDmma L.O 0 N ("') co 0 ..;~~-gg~ 8 ~e o 0 o 0 ci M o '" .. 0 co' a:i '" o 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 000 o 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 000 000 c:i ci c:i ci ci c:i 6 ci M ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci Pi 000 0 0 0 000) 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 m I[) 0. 0 0 co LO ~ 0 0 0) 0) I'- r- "<t. r.o. 0 N N co ...-Mg N~..;ggg~~Nr--O~gg .- .....,..... en wwwwoo-wwww",,"wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww... w o o t) t) o ... w >- I- (f) () 0 III Z W Z l1J I- CI} W U <( t- a:-l~ 5 ~> ~ ~ ~ 0:: ~ <{ <{ i= 0:: (/) 0::: t- <9 ::::i...J 0 o ~"''':J W",W Z Z a. ~ a. ~ 0w ~Gw~ ~~~ ~ ~Ci~~g,ww ~ t- ~ 0::: & ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (/) (/) Z u ~~8~~~~~8~~~~~~i~ ~~~~~~~~~ O::O::><O:::o::<{<{O::~Z"''''1{/)((Q) >- Zoouj<{Xt-...J g 0 ~ t- ~ ~ ~ t- (/) W Z Z 0 t- ~ <9 (/) ~ z zoO:: UJ ~ t- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ffi ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 00 UJ Z Cf) >- >- ~U) -' w UJ W O:::c <{ ~:r: I-~ I-~ ~ 0:: 0::: ~ > ~ <{.c(O::wzo::a::: zc(zZO::W{/)O::Zo zwwa:::~t- 0::: ...J W > <{ 0:: a::: <9 <{ t- 0 6 Ci :r: <{ ~ ~ ...J :r: z W :r: :r: w ~ ~ W t- W a::: <{ .c( wo:::o z Z t- a::: (/) ~ ~ <9 ~ 0 t- t- ~ ~ .c( o 0 ~ 0:: t- 0 0 Z t- t- w UJ ~ 0 t- Z U) ~ ::::i ~ ::::i 0 0 0 ~ 0 ..... N M .., ~ ~ ~ = m ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ M"'~l.D~=m NNNNNNN ~ if) 0'" f- ~ "' "' z z ~ ~ I- f- '" o >- '" I- t) W ~ Z if) ~ w ~ 0 ~ a... U i= a... U t- Z <( t- (/) 0 U) U) Z U t- Z zoo:: W ~ ~ t) ~ 8 t- t- ffi w ~ :J t- I- u.. > > CO w w U) 0::: 0:: -' <!) <9 z w w c( o 0 <{ U) (/) I- ~~a:::wwo 1Il 1Il t- a::: 0::: I- o ~ .., .., '" M .. .., .., '" - N CD .... C Zen ::10 U.o -N ::I CO I-N l/) :E lii wJ:l wS ...J U ~o o :E :E ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 cO .0 0 0 0 , , , , 0 , ai , 0 m" to I'- N '<t 0 to 0> (') ::J ._ to 0> e CD N 0> ~ I'- ... III N N ~ - Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> ... Cl (') 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E e: , , 0 , L() CO to 0 , 0 , 0 , CO <( e: L() '<t L() L() to to 0 0 0> ~ to to ~ m m 0 0 III I'- m N m L() (V) 0 0 E ~ ~ >- GI u.a: Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> Y> :> 0 en en en en g GI GI Q) Q) " " " " E en '2:; '2:; '2:; '2:; - > ::J Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 (f) (f) (f) (f) tIl - Q) ::J c;; ~ '" ~ en en ~ ~ tIl " en en ~ ~ c '" Q) Q) ::J ::J ::J ::J .g .s:: Q) Q) " " t5 t5 t5 t5 Q. 0 (!! 2:; '2:; (f) en " l- e: E Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ - c - Q) Q) - - - - c c: '" en en ~ GIS .f; ~ (f) (f) en :.c :.c :.c :.c 0 '2:; Q) c Q) c.- Q) Q) " " " " :;::; Q) c P 'C C g. g " ~ ~ ~ ~ rl Q) (f) - '0; Q) c '2:; <( <( <( <( (f) c ...: '0; - " '" , , ~ ~ ~ ~ i5 0 c '" []J ~ ~ Q) c;; ~ Q " " Q) ~ 0 (f) 0 'C Q. <.) Q) ii: ii: .?: '" rl rl '" ell g ~ " " " ~ - c 2 '" .s:: .s:: en en en en .~ Q) .g ~ Q. en en c 'C 'C 'C 'C ~ :;::; en ::J c C c c " en .s:: '" Q) ~ ~ 0 '" '" '" '" Q) Q) Q) :2 '" Q. 0:: l- I- <.) -' -' -' -' 0:: (f) 0 -' $: =II: " I'- iii ~ , 'i:; 0 0 0 0 ~ L() I'- GI CO CO CO CO I'- 0 (') ~ ~ <( ~ <( 0 0 0 0 ~ I'- , ~ ~ 'E - - L() L() L() L() (') <( '<t Z Z Z Z Z , , , , z , ~ , z 0 to to to to L() , I'- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .lO: .. -' 0 l- s: m CO to L() I'- L() (') I'- N m I'- to to 0 to 0> N N '<t to ~ 0 ~ '<t 0 (') 0 CO (') N N '<t L() CO 0 CO 0 =II: (') N Q. N <.) L() ~ ~ I'- N N (') N 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'C ~ <9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L() L() L() L() L() L() L() L() L() L() L() L() '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t g .... 0 0 :;::; c <.) <.) .s:: GI '0; ~ :2 E Q) - - en ~ c '" '" ..c Q) -' III c en en E - C/l Z 'C '" ~ ~ .!ll c []J 'ijj " c;; .. ell en en 0:: ~ 0 GI -' en is is en c c - Q) en .g ~ " c;; 0 en c c c c - <( e: Q) Q) 0 c (f) i= 'ti en .g .21 .2 .g .2 GI '" Q) Q) <.) C/l ~ c;; c;; en en en en (f) c ::J > Q) Q) - Q) Q) Q) Q) c ~ E (f) ~ ~ " 0 0 0 0 en '" Q) C]) '" 0 0 (!! " Q) .s:: en E ~ c <9 - ::J ::J E E i5 -' -' -' -' ~ C ::J '" 0 0 E E 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: ell " 0 <.) u.. E ..., ..., ..., ..., -' ~ ~ (f) $: 16/1 A6 . I'- o CO; en I'- .0 ..... Y> M <Xl I'- I'- en cO II> Y> ill N + '<t N en Q) e: ~ -' <( I- o I- ::) ... ... 0 t/l :;;: ::II! N - W=~ WC" ..JZ. ~::)~ Cu.. ::II! ti. ! tZ :L ,!~ ~... oi( ~;;j&&:::l<;~~ ~I ~ ~ 8 :; ~ ~ 5 ...."'~ .. .. ~ 0>> ... OJ - I'" ,~&~~&&~iI!8!l;j2!2! ...S!l!!l!S!8.....8t:.... :!l~_;so"';;::;:_l<i:l;r; ~~ If: C'oI-I~I~13~= g&'l8U~8&'l 8l!l8l!!1i!!'i N.... N;':: C!5 N !!it!'!~pit "'''' N!:! "'"..----....-........... ll! N 8::: :Olllllil , , ~ ~~' ~!~~~ -;1! ::ll:!: gl'" 1Il !'! I"I~ Ie - e ! 161 ~... ,.., I .1. A6 ~Hi&&!I.1ii ldilH~ . "!2! - - p tit .. .,. .. .. .. lit .. .. .. .. -I-i _I M .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..i- iI 8;;80 .. ~:l!~lpl::t:5:5'!~lI! p , "" ,,,! ~ ~~~~ :2 !'! * ~I; il~ 8 8 ~ :l! ;:l; ~ ..... ............ . Il'! ~ "'R'" !:: co -r~5 ~ r.: rj COol c) . Ie p ,. .. -,till .... .,. .. .. tit tilt tit .. .. .. .. .,. .. .. .", .. .. .. .. _I tit _I _I_ -I- ~g ~ Ng~&1&1 ~~ ~ ~~i~i :: ll"i NN~t~ " . a I ......................."'..... I~ ,& & ,:5 & ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~~~~~ II~ ill 0.. l!!~"l;'" e IE ~ c ~ 5-...~S Jm eN..... t.'}<A<AVJfRU} <A <A <AW(/) g~8g ~~~~ ' ~rg""N 888:5 ~~~~ '" oi '" :5 ~ on ................. it 'S Ia lit .. ""'I'" _I'" tit .. .. .. "'" -f- lI!:5:5 8:5 :5 8:5 & & i!'!1:; s81i!!HU!!il85i~ !!~~:;:13"''':~''!H ..... .... -I" .. ... Il't .,. .. .. .. .. .. .. .", .. tit .. .. .. tit .. .. .. 1/1- ... .. .. _! till ... .. tit ..I.. .. .,. tit .. .. lit ..I- ~ ~ a: 0 w 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (I) ~~ ~ ~w ~ ~ ~> ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ 5 ffiwffi 0 ~ ~~~~ ~8w~ m ~~0 w~w ~t ~ ~~~~~~t~~ffi~i oog!~w~~ii~~~~ ~~~W-~Og~~OO~~ W~~~~w~~~~~~w ~~~~~~~~~~~~~41~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~0~OZ...0~~~OC~~~zz8 oW~oi(C~~Wi >>~w~~~~~~~~~I~ffiffib84~~im~2~~ ~~~~~oo~~oooo~~c ~~~~ffi~~~~~~~ffi~ Bg~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ffiffi~5~ig~g~og~ ~N"_G.~..~~==:==~=~~~~=a.~== o ~ ~ ~fl ~~ ;J 2 Ww wO ~ D:: U)::1 (!)... ~ 0 ~8 zO ~>~ tg~~~ ~~::> ~ooz~~ Iii W 00 ~8oo co ~ offi I!'",~~oog ~~~IIi;Ii;~~~~. ~l::~ 88~1ll1ll1ll~ ~!.~ ::):::)~wwwo ~Ot- mmt-a:O:::O:::t- a"RR~=.S;==' 16 f 1 A6 Report Date: October 28, 2009 Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Immokalee MSTU Project Status (IMM-19) - ACTIVE- I" Street Irrigation: Refurbishment Project 9-23-09: Contract/Work Order is being processed anticipate Notice to Proceed after Oct. I" ]0-12-09: Notice to Proceed for PO 4500] 1 ]227; JRL ]RG DES]GN 1ST ST. (lMM-] 8) - ACTIVE- Hwy 29 Irrigation: Refurbishment Project 9-23-09: JRL submittal of concept 'draft' design complete; Contract/Work Order is being processed anticipate Notice to Proceed after Oct. ]" ] 0-12-09: Notice to Proceed PO 4500] 1 ] 225 JRL IRG DES]GN MAIN ST 10-19-09: Main Street Irrigation 75% submittal. Under review by staff. (IMM-] 7) - ACTIVE- "Edgerrin James Sign" ;Request for Sign indicating "Welcome to ]mmoka]ee home of Edgerrin James" for motorist who are traveling to ]mmokalee 9-23-09: CRA to install 'sign' and MSTU is to provide for landscaping or amenities around sign (could include lighting) (lMM-16) - ACTIVE- "Miles abead" Sign; Request for Sign indicating "Miles ahead" to Immoka]ee for motorist who are traveling to ]mmokalee 9-23-09: Confirmation pending from Traffic Operations on exact sign locations (IMM-15) - ACTIVE-ONGOING -LA Maintenance Consnlting; Work Order for JRL; Landscape Architectural Services 9-23-09: Change order in process to add additional monies to contract; Current Contract expiration date for maintenance consulting: March 12, 20 I 0 ] 0- 15-09: Changc Order # 1 for PO 4500105395 processed. (IMM- J ]) - ACTIVE-ONGOING - Roadway Maintenance: BID #06-4008 -- expires: Marcb 10,2010 "Immokalee Beautification M.S.T.U. IM.S.T.D. Roadway Grounds Maintenance"; Commercial Land Maintenance Contract 9-23-09: Draft bid documents have been prepared; pending final edit for bidding. 1611 A6 Date: 10/28/2009 Estimate # : 4384 5935 Taylor Rd. Naples FL. 34109 PHONE 239-777- FAX 239-591-3940 Created By: Tony Lykins 239-777-6201 tony@lykins-signtek.com Estimate I Contract Prepared By Lykins Signtek" Inc. for : Collier County dept. of alternative Address: 2885 Horseshe Dr. 5 Naples FL 34104 To: Darryl Richard Phone: 252-5775 From: Tony Lykins Fax: 252-6219 Quote Repaint, Refurbish Immokalee Dedication Plaques. Item Description Quantity 1) Remove Immokalee Dedication Plaques, add wash, 22 remove all loose and chipping epoxy, prep, repaint, apply clear sealer and re-install. @ $125.00 Price $2.750.00 Sub Total: $2,750.00 Sales $0.00 Total: $2,750.00 **NOTE : Lykins Signtek does not forsee any issues and will take due care but can not be held responsible if Dedication brick plaques crack while being removed and re- Signs are custom produced to your specifications. All orders of $250.00 or less require pre-payment unless prior credit arrangements are I accept the above proposal and agree to pay for said work promptly upon completion of same. Authorized Signature: Date: Deposit Amount: ___ CHECKlCC # Terms and Conditions: Prices on this contnct are valid for 30 days. 50"10 deposit is required to commence aDd tbe balance is due upon completion Signing of this document constitutes a Iqal and bindiDg contraet between parties named on this agreemenl Customer is respoosible for blDdstape amenities within install arca or as required for permitting Goods sold remain the property of seller until paid in full. Customer agrees to provide necessary informadon to obtaiu permit, electrical supply to sign or flXture location, aDd/or provide color and logo information wbere specified. Customer is responsible for any cap rock, lime rock or unforeseen digging conditions 1.5 0/. Montbly Late Fee applied to all past due invoices Warranties: Workmanship: All signlor fixtures fabricated and insalled by Lykins Signtek aDd iu affiliates are warranted against defects in material and workmansbip for one year, parts and labor. Page I ofl . ~,. RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2010 flU8rdo'(;oontyC~ Fiala OP/~/ - Halas .~~-- Henning- ._0 '- Coyle .~' Coletta ,.- - AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes: December 17, 2009 V. Budget Report - Caroline Soto VI. landscape Maintenance Report - ClM VII. landscape Architect's Report - McGee & Associates A. Maintenance Report B. Doral Circle Entry Renovations C. Reuse Mixing Chamber VIII. Transportation Operations Report-Darryl Richard A. Project Manager's Report B. Review of the To Do List IX. Housekeeping Item X. Committee Reports XI. Old Business XII. New Business A. Railing Quote B. Cost Analysis - Pebble Beach Lighting XIII. Public Comments XIV. Adjournment Misc. Corres: The next meeting is February 18, 2010 at 4:00 p.m. 0;") 0 CC Transportation Building Dell: cA-? L 2885 Horseshoe Drive South 11Imt: IL I A1 Naples, Fl 34104 . "'C'")!I?,S to 1611 A7Y/~ GOLF ESTATES BEAUTIFICATION MSTU ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FI 34104 December 17, 2009 Minutes I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Bob Slebodnik at 4:00 P.M. II. Attendance: Members: Robert Slebodnik, Tony Branco, Kathleen Dammert, David Larson, Jennifer Tanner County: Darryl Richard-Project Manager, Tessie Sillery-Operations Coordinator, Caroline Soto-Budget Analyst, Rhonda Cummings- Purchasing Others: Mike McGee-McGee & Associates, Jim Fritchey-CLM, Darlene Lafferty-Kelly Services III. Approval of Agenda Add: IX. A. Entrance Sign Kathleen Dammert moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by David Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. IV. Approval of Minutes: October 15, 2009 Change: Pg. 2, V., sixth paragraph, should read: It was clarified the bid will be open to the following (5) Firms: - "McGee and Associates" - Windham Studios - Urban Green - JRL Design - Goetz and Stropes David Larson moved to approve the October 15,2009 minutes as amended. Second by Tony Branco. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. V. Budget Report - Caroline Soto o Ad Valorem Tax $56,288.36 (outstanding) o Insurance Reimbursement $436.26 (Pebble Beach-Median 14) 16 J 1 A 7 o Available Capital Outlay $17,787.66 Robert Slebodnik questioned Line Item 40-Reserve for Contingency amount of $300,000.00. He perceived $250,000.00 was the approved Budget amount. Caroline Soto confirmed $250,000.00 was approved by the Committee. After discussions the Committee was in agreement that the $300,000.00 will remain in Reserve for Contingency. VI. landscape Maintenance Report - ClM Jim Fritchey reported the following: o Mulching-Complete o Front entrance Flowers-Installed o Ongoing Maintenance o Applied fertilizer, fungicide, and iron treatment on struggling Xanadu. He suggested conducting Soil Sample test and Water Quality test Staff stated the soil and water quality test will be performed under the Maintenance Contract. VII. landscape Architect's Report - McGee & Associates A. Maintenance Report o Underperforming Holly Trees may be replaced with Tabebui B. Doral Circle Entry Renovations The following was reported: o Meeting was held with the Contractor (December 1 ih) o Work schedule will be submitted by the Contractor o Perceived mobilization will commence at the beginning of January (starting with the Bench replacement) o Weekly Project meetings will be held with the Contractor Robert Slebodnik reported per his direction the Project was on hold until the Hedge replacement (along the fence) was complete. Mike McGee stated o The Hedge replacement is complete o Requested CLM soil drench the Hedge (yellow sections) o Wax scale is under control C. Reuse Mixing Chamber Mike McGee reviewed the following information from the Final Plans and Cost Estimate ($45,352.50): (See attached) o Application for ROW Permit will be submitted o Mixing Chamber will be located across from the Fire Station o Location for installation of Electric and Potable Water Meters o Potable water is the backup source 2 161 1 A7 o Adding (3) gate valves at the existing Irrigation Main to direct flow to and from the Mixing Chamber through the Pumping Station After discussions a transfer of $40,000.00 to Capital Outlay from Line Item 39 was suggested by Staff for the Reuse Mixing Chamber Project. Tony Branco moved to transfer $40,000.00 from Line Item 39 to (Capital Outlay) Line Item 32. Second by David Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Staff noted obtaining quotes from Vendors under current County Contract will expedite the timeline (30-60 days) for the Project. A PDF file of the Final Plans will be emailed to the Committee. VIII. Transportation Operations Report - Darryl Richard A. Project Managers Report (See attached) Darryl Richard requested a quote from CLM for sod replacement (Median 3) due to poor condition. (L-45) McGee Annual LA Services Darryl Richard reported the BVO modification per Committee request is complete. BVO Solicitations are due December 23, 2009. He requested an extension on McGee & Associates Contract to avoid a lapse in services. Robert S/ebodnik moved to approve McGee & Associates Contract be extended until May 1, 2010 to allow for the completion of the Pumping Station Project. Second by David Larson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Based on the Contract extension for McGee & Associates, it was agreed to extend the deadline for BVO submittal to January 12,2010. It was determined the BVO Selection Committee will meet January 19, 2010. B. Review of the To Do List (See attached) (Item 2) Solar Light-Tony Branco conveyed information from the December 17th meeting with John Hart: o Solar Panel is receiving sufficient light o (1) Battery has one dead cell and is down to 10 volts o The light and ballast was tested and is operational o Bulb was reattached in the holder o Batteries (2) will be charged, tested, and if necessary replaced (Item 4) FPL Sod Damage on St. Andrews o Sod (near church) requires repair by FPL o Kate Donofrio was contacted and will follow up on repairs 3 16 ~ 1 A7 Discussions took place concerning status on the Railing installation (to conceal the pipe.) Jim Fritchey will contact a local Aluminum Company to fabricate the Railing according to Plans. Darryl Richard requested CLM submit a Quote for Railing at the January 20, 2010 meeting. IX. Housekeeping Item A. Entrance Sign-Darryl Richard will obtain a quote to replace the Entrance Sign and review with Tony Branco. X. Committee Reports-None XI. Old Business-None XII. New Business David Larson questioned if the Lely MSTU would partner with the Civic Association to install lighting on Pebble Beach. After much discussion it was concluded installation of FPL wiring and conduit will be required. It was suggested Mike McGee to prepare a Proposal on Cost Analysis to install lighting on Pebble Beach based on the following options: o Poles in the median o Combination of Poles in the median and out of the median o Consideration on maximum spacing It was noted Decorative Poles would be installed that are uniform with existing Poles in the Community. Kathleen Dammert moved to have McGee & Associates determine what options are available to install lighting on Pebble Beach. Second by David Larson. After discussion the portion of Pebble Beach to be used for the Cost Analysis was defined as "from Forest Hills to St. Andrews." Motion carried unanimously 5-0. XIII. Public Comments-None There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned by the Chair at 5:22 P.M. 4 16> l 1 Lely Golf Estates Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee /~i3 /l!~i Robert Slebodnik, Chairman These minutes approved by the Committee on _I . ,} 1- 10 as presented .>c or amended The next meeting is January 21,2009 at 4:00 p.m. CC Transportation Building 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 5 Aj i -1 1 16 1 A '7 ~ December 17,2009 Lely MSTU "To Do List" l. New decorative light; Status: Inactive: 'Tabled pending review of Stormwater LASIP plans. 2. Solar light Status: Staff is coordinating with Hart's Electrical to confirm proper specification for 'replacement light' for solar light installation. Manufacturer is recommending LED Technology lights, however, there is question regarding the 'look' that LED lights would produce with existing sign. 3. Subrogation Recovery: a. Accident 859; damage amount: $515.00; Median #8 on SI. Andrews Status: Landscape Repair Completed (CLM Estimate E I 002519); No Traffic Accident report found to match damage - subrogation (insurance recovery pending) b. Accident 864; damage amount: $6J2.00; Median #8 on SI. Andrews Status: Landscape Repair Completed; (CLM Estimate E I 002524) No Traffic Accident report found to match damage - subrogation (insurance recovery pending) c. Accident #770; damage amount: $436.26; Median # 14 Pebble Beach Status: Accident associated with Accident #770 4. FPL damage to 'sod' on SI. Andrews: Status: recent inspection indicates that grass has 'grown in' and now covers areas affected. 5. Irrigation Inspections; confirmation of irrigation clock timing per maintenance contractor request/coordination Status: No current 'irrigation alarms' or issues with irrigation 1& I 1 A I Report Date: December 17,2009 LeIy MSTU Project Status (L-47) ACTIVE - Installation of Mixing Chamber Recommendation from McGee & Associates to have Committee consider alternative 'source' for water and utilize a 'mixing chamber' to aliow the Committee to switch from re-use water to either potable water or well water. 8-20-09: McGee & Associates Proposal (dated 7-29-09); $3,876.00 total proposal 9-17-09: Po 4500110200 & Notice to Proceed sent to McGee for completion date of January 16, 2010. 10-15-09: McGee 30% plans submitted; staff coordination with IQ Water Dept. for new connection (L-46) ACTIVE - Relocation ofIrrigation Pump (Warren Street) to 'outside' of Utilities Facility; McGee Services under Landscape Architectural Services Fixed Term; 7-23-09: Based on official request from Utilities Department on July 16, 2009 that Lely MSTU 'move the pump outside of the utility sub-station' staff has investigated the site with McGee & Associates and is coordinating with Utilities in (I) moving the pump outside of the sub-station; and (2) re-connecting with a new 'tap' the service line. 8-20-09: McGee & Associates Proposal (dated 7-29-09); $2,340.00 total proposal 9-17-09: Po 4500110201 & Notice to Proceed sent to McGee for completion date of January 16, 2010. 10-15-09: McGee 30% plans submitted; staff coordination with FPL for service drop. 12-16-09: McGee 90% plans submitted; Cost Estimate Submitted ($45,352.50 total project) (L-46) COMPLETED - Mediau No.3 Project 7-16-09: McGee presents "concept plan" to the Lely MSTU Committee 9-17-09: ROW Permit #09-0341-E issue for project. CLM to provide quote per Committee request. 10-15-09: CLM performing installation per contract rates. 12-16-09: Project is Substantially Completed (L-44) ACTIVE -Doral Circle "North"- Entrance Landscape Project (adjacent to Hibiscus Golf Property) McGee Proposal Submitted (dated 11-20-08) Hannula Landscaping & Irrigation Inc. total bid: $32,212.34 12-11-09: Notice to Proceed for Friday, December II, 2009. Final completion of all work, based on 120 day contract completion, shall be considered to be Saturday, April 10, 20 I 0 12-16-09: Meeting with Dale Hannula to review project schedule (L-43): COMPLETED -DoraI Circle Hedge Project; Rattlesnake Hammock Wall and Landscaping 7-27-09: Staff is currently investigating condition of po do carpus shrubs. 12-16-09: Project Completed; warranty shrubs have been replaced (L-34) - ACTIVE - On Going - Ongoing Maintenance Contract: Commercial Land Maintenance; 7-27-09: Commercial Land Maintenance has trimmed all shrubs to required specification of "Cut to 18 inches and maintain at 24 inches"; Staff will inspect the project on a 'weekly basis'; Contractor is to provide service reports within 12 hours of completion of any contract service. (L-45) ACTIVE - On Going - McGee Annual LA Services - Landscape Architectural Services Fixed Term; 10-15-09: Committee requests another solicitation with 'modified' specifications to be within Budget Constraints 12-16-09: Staff will review the BVO Solicitation with Committee at 12-17-09 meeting 00 z o i= o z w 0:: w U 0:: Ie::) Izg 1-0:: .U w OWl- z-,< 00"" _0::"" Illll.w )-)-00 I-I-:J zzw :J:JO:: oOz uUo 0::0::- wwl- --< ...J...JCl ...J...J- 000:: uu~ W ...J :J o W J: U 00 o iii ~ 0:: o 3: ",015 eoo N...J :!:::< ~- ~O:: ..w Gll- -< ~:;; 00 I- 00 o U u.. o z o Z ll. o 'if!. o o ~ '" - o I- 0000 0000 0000 aoca Q)I.ONI.O Ef7Ef7tA-tA- - .. o U 000- ~~~U) aoaZ g~~Q I- U w vttFtf:A-CI) ~~O iii w . . . 00 (fJC!.lC!.l< -J--.J....Jm ...J < >- l- .. ,_>1 0 ~oJBI- ili a. :ii E I- E ::sa ::s 000 8u.8 _o<l_ ~~M -E5-E 000 uuu ID Cll (() 0..0..0.. ;!:: l: :J ~ o l: :J l: o :;:; '" " ;;:: .u Gl C. (fJ 015 Gl N iii 00 :;;0 ~z -0 1-<0 U wWu -,u_(fJ C QZLLZ ,g g:~~::i .g- "",O:::I-a. u ~~LLO :l wa:oa: o zwwo wo..uu Clo<lZ~ 01-<-1- _zz mww=:! W:2:I-:J CI)>-~O? <<<((fJ 1ll0..:2:<( >- Gl ~ >-E '" Gl ll. - . NM u;u.:u.:u.:roro<ti ...J..J..J..Jwww -0 ~ <Ii l: N 0) ttl 1.0 ro c ~ ~ .5-;; _", '- (/J QJ- ::s l:",_U Ui a. _IV> ,~ Q.) a. :> a.... ::R. C Q) e .9 o .8 nO. Q) o c ..... c.W c c: rn ro::J ro a. ";:: co..... a. .-0'-0:::.- .. .E co . f/J C 0 -r ";: .Q co (I'J '- U) 0> 0 0 -'- 0 :ffi t....... ..E ~.~ 0 0 :S C 1;) 0 c ....:::: o..a.- c.g-~ ~ E't:vz==€ ECO U ;;=e:..cE~:: ::JroO- ::J _000):=00 ~ ~ g -c Cl 0 _00 (;) .~ ~ roz-o g o~~cnroQ.) O'Jc~ (.) ~rnccEm ~ u5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~ 5 :; C Q)'S ..c:~..cc;;c Q) ... 0 -c ~ ~ ro 0 rn 'm o .~ Q) c 3: OJ U c .g> E ~~-= 8 ~~.Q€~rn >()(ij =cm3:WC _)( (jj c'-O 0...2 0... 1;) "V C ._ m .- Q.l 0 rn ::c~~ [ ~E5~Io 1.OQ;:E m c5E>.Eo >..c...... ~ 0:0:: E.!! 0)- > ..... <+= . ro ;; mOrn .- a aJ.8gJ.8~ ~.g>OOl~~ Z (l) '0.. E..o~ 'c.: -g c '- (]J ..c g '-0. rn ~ .!::: -c ..... .Q ..!!! 0 .-:: m ..c.o -0 Qi ~ ro ::J "> s:-ouiOE .!!3:~o~~ ..... 0 IV OJ <1.l ~...... '-'~ 0 '- IDu>Ccn Co EO ..c 0 m 'x U) l/) Q) :> -0 - Em> .- m m > n m m ro roc-:-E..... 0)(5 Cti.....o .c .- 'm ..... mow ~ 0 x .Q O-c_lHID oo-gow..... O)m m ~ E E.~~32 ~..-"* cn.!:Cti"C> ~ (/) mo"-~ ..J x 0 0_ (/) m m Wi: a.O::::> ~ 'E ii CD ~ E ~ C3 ~ W m 0 ~ 0:: ..... m ...... .9 ..... W 0 U- x -c (/) ~ UJm-m-m mmoQ) I-m.oQ)O::: m no~o- 0)1.0..... _ ~ . CD Q)E..-N a.c..--c _>ownooIN<Ol9. Q) :E Q) .- -c 0 .- ID 0"- . - en > z:Ocro.....2:.Q)NomO)~o o ....0) ..- O)C-..... oE!:o=-gffienm"-~ro=U8: .... [E!S-cro cU"-"-.Sw m c:( m II) II) 0) .2 ~ > U ~ m 0.. ~ S2enn+->~=~c..>(5EOc O::::1Ea..-oQ);; 0..>:: I::::::I 0:: Q.) ::::::I Q) 1I)..!Il nl.O _ .q- Li) _ 0 _ 0::: a.. 0 .!: WON N N N N U ~ a: 0:: LO <(LONO I- 'NCJ .wl- a ~...Jro~o..<( ~ :2::2:~CJ~g w -' U :2: o 00000000 ~ 000001.001.0 o cir--.:Nci(()~oC'\l o O.q-NI.OC"")O)OI.O 1.0 LO ..-(() (()M co co M M M ..- fA (l}-fAfAY}-Y}-fflfflffl o C) o o '" co M '" 01.00001.00= OM..-oomoUJ ON..-NNMulZ ~ N..-r--O M i= u W fAfflfflffltA-fflfflU) ..-OOI.OMO.q-O NNr-- 1.0 iii w 00 < III ...J < I- o I- (fJ ..J ~ o o o N M.q-LO<Ot"-OC) 16 , 1 A 7 ... o '" N '" M '" ..- '" I- U W -, o 0:: l1. o iii w 00 < III ...J < I- o I- 1611 A 7 '.' .. p .. ~ H Hilii ll~ ill! ,! !!il!lli i ~ IIII Hi Ii til'!l~1 ; '- El111 ~I ~ Ii IlIlimilll " I iIi 'I :I~~ill n II I! !! I'll I'll' 'Iml!l~l! II :1: i~ k II !I' ;!: Ii II 'I I ,I: ~ 1:1 ,ll,d ~I : '''I Z I; II !'~I i'l! :1:,9 .I'! 151' I"!P', .~ 1:11 II III IIU I~I'! 9 II I: Ip ~ ilj:!; ~ 1,.1 'IPI '" 'ml '!lli!.l~ !l.!J: II Ii i pli !III ill"'!. "i m I! a1p.1 ~ I! ! le!1 P'I! PI!i!~li 'I' fi II!! H!I ~ !Ilil! II ,II!'I . 'I i1QII 5 11a;'II!i!' ~ Ii !iill Ii !!iDi!i,l; III i 1 'l,r,i!1 !.: 1:1 i lil~ll q. I' 'I, l!~ll.~ I · r;Il;liliJI1 Ill,.. 1'1' i l;iil;lll =11 I II WIllful liNt lUll mlu I ',:;i 11,~!lI' II .' I;; 11 ,111'". I H' .., -I> I j i jtl I I ~n,;;,;;~:;;l,; ..8.. ,iUll/l ~ - 11'!lijl:llgllll!l ~ 91!~I~II.BIPi ; i:i1.IIII"lljlI I P.lq I d ,: I 0 !~' i 'llllli I . I' i !r.i! I I ~ I, I I I I ' i I ! I ' , I : I ' . , I II I - ..- I X EI [;] (ii] [I] ~ 'I' II ~ "111"11' III' 'I ~ II! II ~ I', ,I I I' I ~ ,~ Ii III,! II I I ~ -'II ~ Iqli!i!lIlll~ I. 0 ! _; _; ! i I II 0 t I ~ I ~ Ii Ii ii, 'I ~ II i ~ I; II ' II ! 0 I I ~ dill! !lll I!I~ ~,' II "II I i I . I, Ii I I --... - .. -. 0]1. , - "::':r";; ~A"', M"TV ('if{) ?lkqa & ,.44udatt'4 (?I! ).~ ji I: IJIUt.I....TION 1IlZIJee"-''TBt ~ & L...._....... ....."11__. & ~ .!. " ~ATtON' HODtpt\GATION!o 'JtA _-__.--- ~A :::t::: 1M.1....T1ON~ )'T '::...-=::=..~":::.= 7T --- t~8~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~tw~~~~m~~~~~~ J"''''''' mmm :','. ""I! '" '"I..,..,n~ .. 00."." ,zO 0 " ':00::0::0 COO ;;!OO ZZZ o:::::!:::! mZZ oGlGl );~~ -00 ;:-<-< '" ~~m~~~~oo."oc~c~ooz~mo>z~ml-'~zoO~~~zzz."OO ~ 6 a ~ ~ "'Cl"'Cl riLi ~:i ~ ~ ~ ~ jl ~ ~ ~:t z Q i ~,; ~ m ~ $j ~ ~ ~ ~ ni rii ~ ~ ji Z G'J G'J Z z :::j ~ ~ m:::! m Z -l -l 0 z::u m ~ m 0 ~ < .,,(: Z tn ~ ~ Z z rn::u:::tl ~::t )>. )>. 0mm~0~<~:::tIC:::tl0ZZ::t~)>.:::tI::u:::tl~~-<~m:lc~~*~~~~zc>m~~oo .,,~~ -lr-n1::lON3:mGlGl r-z~-o_ _m~,"'''' z~3:::t< m~~~OO3:Z"'Clm-cn moz~o'iJ~Zoo':', ,,~moo~~mo-lm:ii)>~ ~:::tI:;:n 00 --" c:: m (j) m:::tl ~ Qo ~ 3: :::tI m 0 ~ z m 00 G'J 0-'"' '00 ~:::u:::tl ."." ~ m -l Z 0 r-o '" >> ....~zm::u:x:m"'Cl ~ CflG)oo~~- ."~i'",, ~;:E::u:::uO"o):o~ 0 ozz ....~~x>mr-mcz ~mm ::UZ~m::t~, ~)>)>OO-lOXzQ:::U::::o zenoo c::~en"'Cl-l::::or::uo~ OOz< ):on mm- ,O<::u::::o 0 o~zmm 00 -l)> Z (j) m z ~)> S:::::tI m ni m < 0 i5 ~ en ::::0;'>;,0 00 s:: s:: m ~ 0 m _ s:: s:: -lg~ ~ ~~G'J~~~~I s::~~ ~~~ .','~ oG'J~~-~~~~~~ o~ 0 mm 00 zz 3:r- )>-lm:::tl "'~X"'Cl z~oomxx ~_ ~ ~ ~~ Q~ ~ ~~c ffi ~mO~ o~-l~ ~m ~ r- I ~ ~ ~ OC~~w cn~ ~ O:::tl::u m m m ,...rm -l)> s:: Z s:: ~:::tI o -I (5)> CD -l ::0 m )> z CD 0 o r n -< ;;0 m ,. o o w.. 00 00 00 00 00 ~~M~~MM~M~~~MM~~M~M~M~M~~~~ "''''~ ~ - Co o NI'.)~(.n ~(')OO -:...-..... ~~" 80 0 o 0 0000 0000 - 00 '" "'~ m.... ~o 0 (.oaooo ....000 0066 0000 MM MY> (A'" m o!'->-'" tnO 0"0 fD 00000 00000 60660 00000 'f) " : (~ " ~ i:: c., (,) G ':) , "'''' .-"'tn,O> 0'1 0'1 0.0 '0-0 ~gg8g 06666 00000 M~M~M~MM w '" .. '", o o 6 '" .. ~ '" o o 6 9 0; " o o 6 9 ww'" "'''' '" ~~~ "'''' w ~~ ~ ({, U, Ul {n (I' {fl M(A(A~(A~~(I)(A(I)~(A~ " , , M~M(A(A(I)M(A(A(A(A(I)~(A~(A(A(A(A ~ :: (AYJ~YJ(A(A(A~(A~(A(A(A ~.. :"'0, ~'" "'''' Uii-.> .... "'''' WW .".......,....... m gg ~ 06 ~oo '" ..~ :"'0, r~ :"'ID -'" ~ ~ "'0 ..0 ~g w '" "'''' ..'" "'~ 00 '~'" ~'" "'.. :""m "'~ ,ID .. 0> 0>.0 "''''~ "''''0 In-...jo o~o M(A~~(A~MMOOYJM(A~~(AYJYJYJYJYJ "'~~ ......Wb. ..~ w ...w w o~i-.> -"'~ -~ ...... ......,....... 00'" ...... ,"m "'''' .. w~ ~~~ "''''''' f:~ ~ m;: (' "'", n~ '" ~ ~ :t::;...liI - 0 -< it 8~io /.nUl 00 00 60 09 ...'" 0'1",-0, 0'1 fD 00000 00000 00000 00000 j~_!!l w !l! ~ ttli3; eH ::!::!:l! o~g ~...." ~n: ....:t-t iU Iii ~i~ iSli li W .....WtnO~tn J,.w"m-ooo A-...jOOtnO Wtnoooo (0(.,)0066 "'lOOCOO ~~~~~~ W::lG)G)G)::l iO ~ m u ~ G;";::tQo9<>9<> ~ /;,in: () tIl tIl tIl 000 000 s-::t::x: ~ m m a~~ n~~ !a 5, ~ "'@~ ~"- g 3 u g :i" ~ 0 m 3 m 3 ."..f>, ."..f>, ~~~~ o w W W 0 o",mf\J ~8:~~ .. ~~ ~ 09: ~~ 00 o ""0 ~~~ Gi n OWW;.+ ~.." "'~m ~ "'~ ZZ );); 0000 ClI'f'fCf' tnO'1<.nwz a:ggj); 000 00 ... 0 j.&' ow '" w w"' ... o Ii! moo):oc::coonoom-n C1l lB" ::l )>)> m 0 ::l 0 cp 0 6::lEcneng30~~(ij ~;:o~m(llit':;:~n6'~ Dl.a"'Cl~"~"::l"UJm::i"q< m....nomtll-" ;:0 ",g,(Dm-<cpar (II " tIl III en _" U r- tIl (;QO'~~B-w g ::l ".... ~ tIl m::l .... Q.m~(r -0. ~ tIl )( c::: m ;::c ~ tIl ~ !a." 3 tIl m m ijl ~ u -gal )>::u ~ ~"~ 9-:! 0" ~ ;::;: tIl :J 0:: ~mlt la- c: ~ tIl g iil ~~" g'w! S g 5:: ~ ;:; g . m", o ~ ~ 5' m . w o + ~ .~ (I' M '" ~ :.... ~w "'''' :""i-.> ~'" w_ "'''' w... mm ~~ YJY'l~YJ(,F.I-OO(l)-OOYJ~YJ "8 'i: tt; ~'" om m-J ~~ ~~ ."." ,,0 "'~ . ~ '" m . o c ~ . -n-nnno< Q Q 0 0 0 . :;.: a: 33 ffi" ffi' a m m ......... ::l ~ n n'" ::! 000 Z ~~533 0" (;.:<':;:. :::I::lC:::tl 0.2: 0 ~ " m " " ,~" ~~~~g ---~~Q"tJ ~~~~"'Clofl ~ ~ ~~.9l ~~~ ZWtnW );~~~ ,,~o ~ "',.. 0:0 "a m " o 'Pzz ~ -- ~)lo)> "' ."" C1l ::!" ~o =m ~" g' " m ~ w .. '" . " ;; ~ it 3 w Gl~'" am 0 3&"~ g-"",~ ;:g>" ~ ~ ;::;: m" ~ m ~ @ o _al ;; , 3 :u o " (n <f' ((' (f; '" Oil if' ,,; U1 (I'" ". ,,-, '<j " ( , <' en 'x' ;0'" CO ~: 3 m 0 'i " 3" ~ m ... '" '" m o o (^, ~--' if: ~ ti ii "j> " r.) g: t.) Q t,) ," ;~~ ()l n ~,) ~ ~Y'lYJYJ(AYJY'lY'lYJWYJY'l(,F.I~(AY'l~ '" .. ~ .. :"'-O).f>, -...j.f>, CD 0'1"0 f~8~~<o~g :t~ggjgg~g w "'''' ~~ ~~ " ..~ . c g:5:!!.. o 6 o _lO_....... ..~ '" ~ ~ '" "'''' 0. :....,:...... o ~'" -'" "'c ~; ~~ o 6 9 m ~~ -~ ~ W c :::~ <nO ~ ... 0;0 f;~ '" '" '" '" t611A7 ,. 3 m , a. m a. o o 3 3 ;+ 3 m , " ,. n " !!!. ,. < ~, i>> " " o ell C'l ell 3 cr ell .. .... .... N o o CD '"I1r- el!! zoo( 03: ....0 Cft-l Ne ." :i o 161lA8 , OFty' / RECEIVED FEB 2 3 2010 THE OCHOPEE FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 7, 2009 Fiala Halas Henning Coyle Coletta -r ~~ Boom of County CommiSSIoners In attendance were the following: Alan McLaughlin, Fire Chief Mitchell Roberts, Chairman Copeland John Pennell, Plantation Island, Advisory Board Member James Simmons, Port of the Islands, Advisory Board Member The meeting began at 6:15PM. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes for the October 19, 2009 meeting were approved. OLD BUSINESS: ALS Engine, New Lieutenant and Captain: Chief McLaughlin - As of last Monday the ALS Engine Program has been up and running. He feels it is running smoothly. Initially there was a delay of 30 days due to the union Issues but everyone agreea to move forward with the program for a 90 day trial period. There are some issues that still may have to be resolved. Some adjustments have been made in the Station giving personnel more room due to the new Lieutenant and Captain coming on. The Captain came on the same day as the new ALS Program started which was a great benefit to us administratively. Caleb Morris is the new Captain he is on days 40 hours a week. The new Lieutenant, Sergio Valdes scored the highest in the testing it was very tight. There was only a point difference between Sergio Valdes and Lee Kidder. Mitchell Roberts brought up that the last meeting they discussed looking over the five monthly reports. He asked if anyone had a question regarding the reports. James Simmons said the one thing that impressed him the most was all the time that is spent on 1,75. Page 1 Mise, COITes: Date: D 3 L;)'3{1IL- Item #.Lk:cu)AZ "-":"';':::-S\.;:;. <'-.'."-"" 16'1~d8 ~ Mitchell Roberts said it averages over 50% which has made him think about it. He has looked over tax information throughout the County, It aggravates him that we as tax payers here pay for over 50% of our usage to go to a migrant people. He is going to pursue some of the tax issues to kind of educate him on some ofthe millage rates. James Simmons - The time it takes to respond that far is hard on the equipment and personnel but also not fair to the injured on 1-75. Chief McLaughlin - He said it is a state road and a federal highway they need to provide the service for it but they have been milking the Department for years. Because of the economy the way it is somebody is going to have to help pay for the service out there. The citizens of this community cannot continue to support half of their fire protection having to respond almost 50 miles from the station. Mitchell Roberts asked what legally mandates us for coverage, it Is a moral Issue? Chief McLaughlin - He said legally do we have to go? Jim Mudd actually made a statement that we'll quit going. It is within the power of the commission to say no more. It's a state road and a federal highway they need to take care of the people out there we go as a moral Issue right now. If we didn't go either Broward would go Into Collier County or Golden Gate would run out. But he feels after they make quite a few runs out there that would change they don't realize how much we run out there. They would be in the same boat running at times 50 miles from the station with all of their critical equipment. He feels they would feel the Impact even more because they cover urban areas. Mitchell Roberts said It aggravates him because we've got a toll road and if I am going Into a community I feel that I am helping to pay for that highway and at the same time it should be a safer environment for me when it comes to emergency personnel and response time. He is surprised a visitor who had to wait on a response time of 35 or 45 minutes hasn't sued. Suing the State could be a dead end, Chief Mclaughlin - They couldn't sue us because we are providing the service gratis as it is. As In the letter a year ago In which you questioned them regarding the fifty cent toll increase which would have been four million dollars and yet the last two times we were out there the State Trooper was coming out of Miramar Florida. He wants to know where the four million dollars in toll went It didn't go to Collier County. He figured four million dollars was 220 Troopers and then they turned around and said they don't provide that service. But that wasn't true because they have Increased the toll to pay for more Troopers. He feels the money was filtered to other parts ofthe State Instead of here. Page 2 l61l11 IllIlII! , Mitchell Roberts said It became a dead end with the Department ofTransportation. He may try to talk to Commissioner Colletta when he has his open house at the Courthouse In Everglades City. He wants to ask Commissioner Colletta what It would take to put on the agenda to suspend services on 1-75 until we receive revenue from the State. Chief McLaughlin - He feels it will take a Representative like Matt Hudson who understands this problem and championed some of this also. This is becoming a big issue especially as money becomes tighter and tighter. They need to provide for a facility and personnel costs so that it does not impact the local residences. The facility would have to be fully funded by the State or the Federai Government whoever has the toll road It would be part of the service for the highway. Mitchell Roberts - He mentioned the Advisory Report section regarding the vehicle maintenance a noticed the cost for maintaining the vehicies Is high and figures a lot of this is attributed to the distance the vehicles have to travel. He understands that the Department has to go with Fleet Services but he feels the dealer would be more affordable. Chief McLaughlin - He has looked into subbing out the work to East Naples in the past we have had issues with the people working on the trucks whether they were certified or not. According to NFPA they have to be fire mechanics. The shops contention Is that as long as someone that is EVT Certified is over seeing them. He has asked shop personnel questions regarding the vehicles and they are not able to explain what is going on. We have had a lot of instances that the wrong part or wrong item is brought out to fix one of the vehicles. The service has been inconsistent. In the Fire District Shops all of the mechanics are fire rated the service would be consistent but their cost would be a little higher in the long run. We are actually doing a little bit better with the County we just have to put up with that part of it but they are getting better. Mitchell Roberts made a motion to approve the monthly Ochopee Fire Control District Advisory Board Reports for May, June, July, August and September 2009 they have been read, reviewed and discussed. The motion was passed. He asked If there was a County site where the millage rates are listed. Chief McLaughlin said it would be at the Clerk of Courts Office. He wanted to know what millage rates he was looking for. Mitchell Roberts said he wanted to take a look at all of them. Chief McLaughiin said the Clerk of Courts should have all those millage rates and the other web site that should have that information Is the property appraiser's Office. The documents themselves you might have to ask for them. The millage rates are set by ordinances. Page 3 16 , 11\ 8 ... Mitchell Roberts said this is a project that he is going to pursue. On line you only have access to the amounts not the actual millage rate for the other properties. He feels the County should provide services at the same costs for all customers. Chief McLaughlin said some of the areas are In MSTU's and special Districts. Mitchell Roberts said from what he understands about those Districts that every dollar you tax yourself the County doesn't get so the County actually looses the money. He tried to push that idea to the community In Copeland but it is not favorable to ask people to pay more taxes even though that money would come to us to use for street lighting or anything else instead of relying on grant monies. Chief McLaughlin suggested Mitchell Roberts try the Clerk of Courts to begin his search regarding millage rates. James Simmons asked what he was looking for. Mitchell Roberts replied that he wanted to learn more about the millage rates. He has calculated that if his house was located at Naples Beach within the City limits that his taxable value would be 40% lower than what they are. Chief McLaughlin said but your value would be higher. Mitchell Roberts feels that the taxes should be the same for everybody and not more for one and less for another. Chief McLaughlin said that Cities can set their tax rates independent of the County and there is a double taxation issue they still pay County taxes as well. He said the best analogy for Mitchell Roberts would be North Naples because it is not a municipality. Also East Naples and Isles of Capri as well could be used as well. Mitchell Roberts said the millage rate is higher in order to support this Fire Department that covers an area that is filled with State and Federal Land plus the 1-75 corridor with no taxes being collected In those areas. The tax payers in this area are suppiementlng that not the State or the Feds. Chief McLaughlin said the Feds do provide a funding back at the County the Pllt funds and we used to receive those funds but we don't any more. Page 4 16 I 1\ It. 8 .. Chief McLaughlin said the funds varied from year to year but he was basically told that we didn't need the money anymore. He said they collected $750,000 In Pilt funds last year. But he felt some of the funds should still come to the Department because we are providing County services In this area including the protection of federal buildings. There are not a lot of roads to maintain so he feels we should receive some of that funding. Mitchell Roberts asked If the Ochopee Fire Control District has the highest rate in the County. Chief McLaughlin said yes we do. Mitchell Roberts - The citizens of this District are fronting the bill they are paying all that money for services that are going elsewhere. Chief McLaughlin - We lost $200,000 in the roll back last year. He felt If we could have collected at least $200,000 of that money which Is only one third of it for the last three years we could have built that fire station been done and in it. It's going to cost $400,000 and change we could have had that in the bank. We are banking on grant money to get us through whereas if they had continued to pay us the money It could have been in our reserves we wouldn't be in a bad way we would have had something to fall back on. The reason we had the $800,000 plus in reserves were from the Pi It funds. We managed to roll a good amount over this year by cutting back but still you can't compete with that we would have had another $200,000 this year which would put us at $400,000 right now. There is nothing he can do about it. Mitchell Roberts - They have talked about this In the past. They sent letters to the state regarding financing for 1-75 and that became a dead end. He feels they will get dead end responses where ever they go. Chief McLaughlin - We stili provide a service to Federal properties all the Federal buildings out there and all the Indian land. We still respond out there they do not do structure protection we do. We respond to all the Incidents on their property whatever may happen that is what the Pilt money was for in lieu of the taxes. James Simmons asked If the Department received any money from the Indian Land. Chief Mclaughlin said no. Mitchell Roberts - He is going to do a little research. Page 5 " ~ 16' 1 NEW BUSINESS Firefighter Position: Chief McLaughlin - He wants to hire internally from our Job Banker pool because they are familiar with the system and require a minimum amount of training. We've have three guys in the Job banker system that we can choose from. Macbeth Collins Not Re-elected Everglades City needs to appoint a new Board Member: Chief McLaughlin - Macbeth Collins was not re-elected s.o the City will have to appoint a new board member. He has been waiting six weeks now trying to put a light pole down by the boat. He has been waiting for approval from the City of Everglades just so he can have the right away to put a pole in. The lines for the utilities have already been struck and will have to be done again. He doesn't know what the holdup Is but the pole has not been installed and there is not illumination for the dock. He is going to pursue this because It Is a security issue due to the thefts In the area. Eventually he wants permanent power to the dock but he will have to work with DEP in order to do that. The security system is in at the Ochopee Fire Station. They want us to sit on our money for a while until the January projections are out. The light pole was a small project he was working on but he also mentioned that a DOF Grant was submitted for the purchase of some VHF Radios. It Is a 50/50 grant the monies will be taken out of Reserves In the amount of approximately $4,000. They have re-banded everything so the old radios don't work. James Simmons - He asked if there was any problems with radio coverage. Chief McLaughlin - Yes, even the 800 can't reach in some areas. One of the reasons we put the VHF Repeater In at Aversana that will give us coverage to the state line for control south. This will be a back up If the 800 system is not operable. They are going to do a test next week regarding the repeater. The pagers will work better once this is up and running. Mitchell Roberts made a motion to adjourn the meeting John Pennell seconded and passed the meeting ended. ~~~ Mitchell Roberts, airman Ochopee Fire Control District Advisory Board Page 6 A8 .. i , I I I I . 16 I. r ll~ JJ;j~'- . ~liil8 v Henning J~ -. ~ PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION Coyle 1 j) A Municipal Services Taxing and Benefit Unit Coletta n~l ( Ii' NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2009 THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION ADVISORY BOARD WILL MEET IN REGULAR SESSION, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2009 AT 1:00 PM AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY, 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES. AGENDA RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2010 The agenda includes, but is not limited: 1. 2. 3. Board ofCounty~ 4. 5. RollCall Wilson Miller Community Improvement Planning Update Approval of Summary Meeting Minutes a) November 4, 2009 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board Regular Session b) November 10, 2009 Community Improvement Planning Study Joint Workshop Audience Participation Administrator's Report a) North Tram Station Pedestrian Safety Issues update b) Monthly Financial Report Chairwoman's Report a) Community Improvement Planning Dual Involvement Update b) Notice of Upcoming Meetings Capital Projects Community Issues Committee Reports and/or Requests Old Business New Business a) Fertilizer order and utilization tracking system discussion (T. Cravens) Miscellaneous Correspondence a) Ongoing Projects Status Sheet Audience Comments Adjournment 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. SPEAKERS FROM THE AUDIENCE WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES ADDITIONALLY. THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT. IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING. HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE. WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ANY PERSON REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS AT THIS MEETING BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHOULD CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION OFFICE AT LEAST FIVE CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT (239) 597-1749. i@I(,~ - ;~. 'f' 01,\1,1 ;}irt' D'":,;,'ji:-I'_,, r:::::;I-j.i,':f'Ki!.ILTi-:::I(, ii.! 1611 A9 ...... Wil.nMiller@ December 2,2009: PBSD Meeting Pelican Bav Community Improvement Pian Update A. Schedule: WlisonMlller is on schedule to deliver the Conceptual Design Report due December 9, 2009 . To date, we have had four Community participation opportunities and three team workshops with the combined PBSD. Foundation and WilsonMilier team in attendance. Additional community meetings and site walks have been included. . We are crafting the first monthly project newsletter for delivery to the Pelican Bay Post this week. . Additional Community notices for upcoming Phases of public events will be delivered to the Foundation by Wednesday of next week for posting in all common and public areas. B. Landscape and Irrigation findings and initiatives . Continue to promote Best Management Practices for watering, fertilization and maintenance practices. . Begin to limit sod within the rights of ways in favor of shrub and groundcovers at the ends of medians and along the length of turn lanes in the medians for less mowing and micro- irrigation delivery. This same practice is being explored along the edges of lakes and preserve areas. . Preparing inventory plans to begin to plan for the removai of diseased or limited life expectancy trees and/or relocation of healthy plant materiais pianted too close to each other. . Preparing inventory plans to begin to plan for rectifying landscape conflicts with sight lines, pathways and side walks and street lighting. . Preparing Inventory plans to begin succession landscape planting programs with coordinated Irrigation system delivery improvements. C. Lighting (Inciuding Inventory Plan) . Prepared inventory plans for Street Light and Landscape Conflicts. . Continue to explore current day lighting delivery systems for improvement considerations including: A. LED and other energy efficient light sources including dark sky criteria compatibility and cost benefit scenarios B. Street Light Pole improvement program C. Lowering light sources below mature canopy D. Relocating light sources as required by mature vegetation E. Pathway lighting needs F. Solar power opportunities G. Landscape and Community Entry Lighting . -----~.----.-.------.-- --.------ ---T--.--- ---.-------.--------------- I, _..'I~.<<'..649.4336 __ 239.649.4040 F 239.643.5716 3200 Bailey Lane Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 r WlIsonMIIJer.com 12/212009 _ 215967. Ver: 1 KMANGAN N0103"OO6-001. _0 16J1A9 , Wi/.aMi//et@ D. Traffic Calming and Pathways (Including Inventory and Analysis Plan) . Recommendations to widen pathway systems to eight as minimum and perhaps ten feet are being considered. . Recommendations to improve pathway systems to meet applicable public standards will accompany the width recommendations. . Recommendation to provide a consistent, high visibility. tactile enhanced cross walk system within the community at all crossings. Each location shouid include a total traffic soiution plan that may be phased in time to include adjustments to lighting and slgnage, curb lines, iandscape and sight line recommendations. . Traffic calming recommendations to include travel lanes. bike lanes and intersection adjustments are being prepared. . Letter prepared and hand delivered to the Collier County Sherriff Department in November asking for statistics for calls for service including roadway and traffic events. A copy of this ietter is attached. E. US 41 Berm/New Technologies (Including Inventory Plan) . Inventory of berm. entry points into the community and community edge conditions Is near completion. Continuity of solutions will be required from the 41 berm into the community entry areas along the road rights of ways. . CPTED principles, safety and security are primary elements of observed conditions along with interior community noise abatement from 41. . Community improvement objectives for landscape. hardscape, lighting and sign age enhancement of entry areas will be included. F. Reviews of PUD, Development Orders. Codes and Permits . Currently, no limiting or non-compliant issues have been discovered. . Upcoming meeting with ABB for water management, preserve and wetland reviews is being scheduled and a meeting with Turrell and Associates is pending. PBSD Board Questions 12/2120og.215967-Ver j.KMANGAN N010:J.-086-001..0 . NEW DIRECTIONS IN PLANNING. DESIGN &. ENGINEERING SINCE 19516 r 1 1A 9 . WilstJnMiller" ~ November 24. 2009 Attn: Central Records Bureau Collier County Sheriffs Office 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building J Naples. FL 34112 Wilson Miller, Inc. is currently working on a community improvement master plan project for the community of Pelican Bay. I would like to request the following public records to assist us with the project: . All incidents (both reports written and calls for service) including traffic crashes in the Pelican Bay grid from 09/1/07 to 09/1/09. Additionally, because we are considering the option of changing the lane configuration on some roads in Pelican Bay, we would like to Identify any problems that may have occurred on Vineyards Boulevard (which has a configuration similar to the one being considered for Pelican Bay Boulevard). To assist us with that part of the analysis, we would like to have the following: . All traffic-related incidents (crashes involving motor vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians) that occurred on Vineyards Boulevard (within the Vineyards Community) between 9/01/04 and 09/01109. If possible, please provide the data electronically in an Excel format with a list of the date/time of incident, location of incident, type of Incident and report number if one was written. I have enclosed a flash-drive to facilitate transferring the data for your convenience. I understand there will be a charge for this data, so if you wouid advise me of the cost, and when the data would be available, I would sincerely appreciate It. If there are any questions, I can be reached at 239-649-4040. Thank you. . erry, AICP. Senior Associate Senior Project Manager WifsonMil/er, Inc. C: Kevin Mangan, Wilson Miller, Inc. Jim Hoppensteadt, Pelican Bay Foundation 3200 Bailey lane Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 800.649.4336 239.649.4040 f 239.643.S716 WlIsonMlller.com ~ 't,~ Fiala ~{::( . Halas ,/" ~ Henning Coyle PELICAN BA~~ A Municipal Services Taxing an Benefit Unit 1("1 1 A 9 RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2010 .../ Board of CounIY eommII&IIlIlIIa NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6, 2010 THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION ADVISORY BOARD WILL MEET IN REGULAR SESSION, WEDNESDAY. JANUARY 6,2010 AT 1:00 PM AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY. 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE. NAPLES. AGENDA The agenda includes, but is not limited: 1. Roll Call 2. Wilson Miller Community Improvements Plan Update 3. Agenda Approval 4. Approval of Summary Meeting Minutes a. November 17, 2009 Community Improvements Plan Joint Workshop b. November 19, 2009 Community Improvements Plan Community Educational Meeting Session One c. November 19, 2009 Community Improvements Plan Community Educational Meeting Session Two d. November 30,2009 Community Improvements Plan Joint Workshop e. December 2, 2009 Regular Session 5. -Audience Participation 6. Administrator's Report a. Independent Expert PBS & J Clam Bay Analysis Peer Review Update b. North Tram Station Pedestrian Safety Issues Update c. Monthly Financial Report 7. Chairwoman's Report a. Pelican Bay Services Division Board Applications Discussion & Recommendations b. Community Improvements Plan Update (by Vice Chairman Dallas) c. Notice of Upcoming Meetings 8. Capital Projects a. lake Bank Enhancements b. South Berm Reconstruction 9. Community Issues 10. Committee Reports and/or Requests 11. Old Business 12. New Business 13. Miscellaneous Correspondence a. Ongoing Projects Status Sheet 14. Audience Comments 15. Adjournment SPEAKERS FROM THE AUDIENCE WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES ADDITIONALLY. THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT. IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE. HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE. WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ANY PERSON REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS AT THIS MEETING BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHOULD CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION OFFICE AT LEAST FIVE CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT (239) 597-1749. ;.~s 12129/200912:52:19 PM ':S,i\i # ...:..~- 1611 A9JEd rEB 19 20\0 ,/ PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION A Municipal Services Taxing and Benefit Unit la........ Board of COUnty CllIfr NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2010 THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION ADVISORY BOARD WILL MEET IN REGULAR SESSION WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 20iO Al 100 PM AT THE COMMUNITY ~Iir.TE~-pf1~ ,t, r PELICAN BA Y 8960 HAMMOCK OAK, DRIVE NAPLES 1111 / Haae . AGENDA Henning Coyle Coletta The agenda includes, but is not limited: ~ 1. 2. 3. 4. Roll Call Wilson Miller Community Improvements Plan Update Agenda Approval Approval of Meeting Minutes a. December 9, 2009 Community Improvements Plan Joint Workshop b. December 21, 2009 Community Improvements Plan Joint Workshop c. January 6, 2010 Regular Session d. January 11, 2010 Community Improvements Plan Town Hall Session One e. January 11, 2010 Community Improvements Plan Town Hall Session Two Audience Participation Administrator's Report a. Independent Peer Review Selection Process & Timeline b. Monthly Financial Report Chairwoman's Report 3. Pelican Bay Services ~ivision Board Candidates Discussion i. Candidate Introductions ii. Pelican Bay Services Division Board Candidate Forum T. Raia iii. Pelican Bay Services Division Board Responsibilities b. Surface Water Sampling & Monitoring Protocol Discussion & Approval T. Hall, Turrell, Hall & Associates c. Announcements Capital Projects a. Lake Bank Enhancements b. South Berm Reconstruction Community Issues Committee Reports and/or Requests Budget Committee a. Funds for Community Improvements Plan Discussion - M. Levy b. Mangrove Restoration FY 10 & FY 11 Funding, Services, & Permitting Discussion - M. Levy ~-~ ~~ a. Further Discussion of H.R. Wanless Submittal- T. Raia New Business Miscellaneous Correspondence a. Ongoing Projects Status Sheet Audience Comments Adjournment ...'""''''''' S. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. r,:l\~..-_ ':~_::::;-:::''':i:si;':'~ ~{' :tr 14. 1S. SPEAKERS FROM THE AUDIENCE WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ANY PERSON REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS AT THIS MEETING BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHOULD CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION OFFICE AT LEAST FIVE CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT (239) S97-1749. 1128120108:10:31 AM 161 1 A 9 CAC January 14, 2010 VIII-5d New Business 1011 ~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Review and approve the approach and timing for Clam Bay Peer review. OBJECTIVE: review. For the CAC to approve the approach and timing for Clam Bay Peer CONSIDERATIONS: The Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved peer review for the Clam Bay Data Collection and Analysis Report along with the modeling program at the December 18, 2009 BCC meeting. Selection of the review was to be a recognized expert in coastal system and water quality from academicia with no ties to consulting or Collier County. This individual was also to be jointly approved by the Pelican Bay SelVices Division and Coastal lone Management with the PBSD contributing half of the cost of the review. A total of $13,000 has been approved by the BCC for Coastal lone Management to spend on this peer review. Additional funds may be available if navigational markers are not installed this year and monies can be reallocated by approving boards. With PBSD matching funds, $26,000 at a minimum is available for peer review. The following approach to peer review is outlined for consideration: It B D t D em jV ae ue 1. Develop scope of work for peer review JGM 1/21/2010 2. Review/approve scope/approach CAC 2111/2010 3. Letter of Interest Solicitation through County Purchasing 3/1/2010 Purchasing 4. Select peer review individual ClM/PBSD 3/11/2010 5. Award contract Purchasina 4/1/2010 ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of this item. FISCAL IMPACT: The Source of funds is from unincorporated Collier County Tax Fund 111. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There are no Growth Management Impacts resulting from this study. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient for Board action. - CMG RECOMMENDATION: For the CAC to approve the approach and timing for Clam Bay Peer Review outlined in this Executive Summary. PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin, CZM Director February 3, 2010 Pelican Bay Services Division Regular Session 6 A - Administrator's Report - Independent Peer Review Selection Process & Timeline Page 1 ofl l~rl A9 ResnickL From: Sent: To: Subject Jerry Moffatt [gamoffatt@rnsn.com] Thursday, January 21,201012:15 PM Resnickl Water sampling protocol Follow Up Flag: FIa, Status: Follow up Flagged Lisa-Can you ask Tim to prepare a summary of the deficiencies that the new protocol is correcting. Also a quick review by me did not disclose a requirement to enter the info into STORET. Did I miss this requirement or is it not included? If not, why not? Thanks Jerry 1 of 1 1{29{201O 12:40 PM by LR lRie~mk:!~L ~ -~ -~-,,- rs;-rn ..... ...~- ~ fi'"om: Jerry Morratil [ga~';'l-3ff~ii;@msli1"com] Tht']i'"sdaV, Janu<:J'V 21., 2:DJ.G 1'.:03 P:\f1 c<Oi"all<Jple5@ilo~.WM Resb'ilic1(I.; Naples Moff21u.t; 'Neil Dmriil' Response to your commen(s S3.!j"J',; y(,)~ iC!::: Subjed:: Follow Up Flag: flag Status: Follow up Flagged j(~1 ,,_. Tild,rj I "to: 'lCHI' (,{,i,'(lf';'j,,:,nt Let rre t"r"/ T,:> ;:::5lJC,n- ;,::' 1)::2 sc)/neOfj~,'\/fjth 3!2reat {leal of busiiJeSE- S~,"!';f Ln, th':: ,~:2b:e or thE:' PBS[i 1,'''',:' ~~,iH.-' i Ljr.lr,,;r: !";(' -- j idle s.pe; <\ I:i (H"nnb "f /.~::n'"::, JJ ,'L:,:, I',; OlE i i' t,") ~'jf.:r2 I'C,t c1 :(;;-~=.c" ': ttut (;1>;' -<;~j_~:, J,!rd; j -rE~2 Jt:;j\,<-:::;: u::. at the )jj'?iC/ (/f dri'1'on;.::' \'Vl-i[' ',Vd(,t> ;')1..1:" ":(,;;~djhjHt,.j siJch:iS P'H':..;t:, b~elI'::(\') Sf:;'!' n~lv tilEr: ''/(:: 11")1.151: :l,,::'tn,';;' "'ff31;? 1i:;~h~: Br/~I tri-'"': ti~:'J',NS :;:,'''0. '-~'~~p'--:HI~inje 1(i "iU! ~i: rny recomrnenc\ati(J(L Tin! t-!dll h3':. dev-ek~ped ;j r2Jj5edir~e'N for "sur-f,3ce ,<;vater sarr:pHng an,::! rnDnaC1dn:~". HE: ci!stributed a '"::oPV of it at our hst rneeting un JafL 6 and I have ret:onjjflended it bean our agenda fDr (:ur Feb, 3 meeting fo, dlscussionara appr.0val if W2 afe conVin!~eCi it i[l,,=,~ts stat? standar-tJs ! CiHi)t Tell you if those st?tesccmdards haVE ch,angecl ;;j(]{E the "'permit" was issued Of not but the f;Kt that Wt; \/'-/€rp net in complia!!(€ witf: st:..3t-e standards allD'Ned PBS&J and others tD level criticisrn at Pelican BdV Tha1: (:annot b~:: anmN2d t() (oJltinue. ! }.,'oulcl think 'IOU can get a cOP'! of the protocol from the PBSD offices. Based on discussion at earlier PBSD meetings, we appareotiy were deficient in areas of training, equipment calibration, equipment cleaning) preservation and reporting. I have asked that rjm discuss all of these topics at our next rneeting I believe the separate ared.5 are navigational rnarkers and all other (mangrove maintenance, water quality_ etc), I am in complete agreement with your observation. I don'l believe the peer review has any impact on the rnarker issue Mhich is the subject of the proposed appeal in the Letter of Consent. They are two separate issues I beiieve we need to question whether the expenditure of up to $60,000 in county funds to pay for the cost of this appeal is warranted given tele continued ruts in county services due to the budget situation. This issue needs to be raised when the BeC addresses Gory's reque.;t. and privately with the appropriate parties before the meeting. Unfortunateiy the way the Wanless report was handled (an end run around the agreement the PBSD had with the CAe for a peer review) it IS of no value in resolving this dispute Good intentions but very poor execution. I hope this is heipful. Jerry From: ooranaples@aoLoom [mailto:ooranaples@aoLcom] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:56 AM To: gamoffatt@msn,oom SUbject: (no subject) Jerry, the water samplings that were taken in the olden days are what the permit requested as did the Conservancy for checking quality of water. My impression was that they didn't qualify for the PBJ&S report was because the statistics were not registered on Storet (the state filing cabinet). What changes were made and where can I see or get the new report. The mangroves and water are being treated as separate subject - they aren't because both make an impact in the same place. I understand that McAlpine is going to ask the BCC to approve to go forward with requesting the "Letter of Consent" from the Gov. and his cabinet on the 26th. Will it make any difference that PBSD and the County have not had their choice of a peer review selected and done. The Wanless report should be looked at seriously because he was involved with Clam Bay before W did anything in what is now PB. He also has worked with Rookery Bay and was part of the review of Clam Bay in the late 1990'5. 1 of 1. 1/29{2010 12:40 PM by LR pELIC-flN 13r1;! f'C'SI~ - niP Tt.i.wvtiR.)/ 2010 Community Improvement Plan The natural next step By The Strategic Planning Committee 161:1 Ai~ Pelican Bay has two orga- nizations committed to, and focused on, maintaining and enhancing the infrastructure and amenities of our commu- nity. From its very inception, the "founding fathers" of Pelican Bay anticipated the need to augment typically delivered municipal services and protect residents' qual- ity of life and property val- ues. To that end, the Peli- can Bay Services ~ivision (PBSO), and the Pelican Bay Foundation (Foundation) were established. The PBSO has responsi- bility for the community's "public" streets and land; community Improvement plan...contlnued from page 1 the Community Improve- and inventories. A series ment Plan. The primary of information, education purpose of developing a and feedback meetings on plan is to enso/e that mon- topics such as crosswalks, ey spent in Pelican Bay is pathways,lighting,theberm spent wisely. The plan will along the mangroves, the prioritize elements within berm along U.S. 41,ourcom- the community which im- munity parks, streetscape pact safety, security and (or median landscaping), propertyvalues.Sothatcom- etc. have been held. As of munity initiatives can be the anticipated publish- consistent, uniform and co- ing of this article in mid- ordinated, the PBSO and the January, 15 meetings have Foundation have retained been held with WilsonMiller the services of a locally es- and Pelican Bay representa- tablished and renowned tive organizations. engineering and landscap- Both the PBSO, and the ing firm, WilsonMiller. The Foundation have significant PBSO and the Foundation funds already set aside for are sharing the cost of the the recommendations that consulting firm. will come from the plan. 'Io Starting in October 2009, reiterate and address ex- WllsonMiller conducted the pressed concern of some requisite on-site evaluations residents, what is being specifically by working on crosswalks,landscaping, irri- gation, street lighting, storm water management, etc. The Foundation exerts the same focus on the community's Uprivate", or cornmon lands. Both entities consider safety, security, and propertyvalues as their overriding priorities. worked on is a plan, not a spending schedule. Once theplaniscorn.pleted. , each omanization. consistent with its resPective areas of resOOnsibilitv(PBSD-pub- lic lands; Foundation - pri- vate, common lands\. will further vet, discuss. evalu- ate and justify the funding, either out of their reserve, or capital funds (depend- ing upon the nature of the expenditure). Again, as of the writing of this article. no projects have been approved. or specifically funded by either organization. Ifyouhaveadditionalques- lions, or feedback, please di- rect those to either Suzanne Minadeo(sminadeo@pelican bay.org) or Lisa Resnick (lresnick@colliergov.net). The PBSO funds its work through a municipal tax and the Foundation funds its work through annual assess- ments and resale fees. It is with this joint sense of community responsibility that the PBSO and the Foun- dation have embarked upon continued on page 3 February 3, 2010 Pelican Bay Services Division Regular Session lOA - Corrunittee Repons andlor Requests - Budget Committee 'D.",]"€", 1 of 2 161 1 From: To: Subj_, Date: j'::lit~~x Gc'ilid;1 Feedback to PB Post Article "Community Improvement Plan". Monday, JanuafY 18, 2010 5:57:49 PM Hi Usa. In the latest issue of the Pelican Bay Post there is a page 1 article entttled "Communtty Improvement Plan". At the end of the article tt requests feedback be sent to you or Suzanne Minadeo. I am writing to give you "feedback:'. The article states, "Both the PBSO, and the Foundation have significant funds already set aside for the recommendations that wm come from the plan". The article further states ...................(The appropriate organization) ..will----evaluate and justify the funding, either out of their reserve, or capital funds .............. In the case of PBSO, I befieve this is misleading. The PBSO FY 2010 Approved Budget shows a total of $1,924,500 available for yel to be named capital projects. While this is a meaningful sum of available funds, it is likely to cover only a small portion of the recommendations yet to come from Wilson Miller which are the responsibility of PBSO. I suggest at the next PBSD Board Meeting. stall give us an up to date amount of funds available and this matter be discussed. Thanks. Mike Levy mil<elevYlwembaromail com February 3, 2010 Pelican Bay Services Division Regular Session lOA - Committee Reports and/or Reqnests - Budget Committee Page 2 of 2 'A9 ReI!Ilcld. Subject: 2/3/10-M.levVmanirovefunds fy10&fy11 ~ From: Mike Levy [mailto:mikelevy@embarqmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:40 PM To: ResnickL Subject: Levy mangrove funds fy 10 & fy 11 for 2/3/10 agenda Hi Lisa. The PBSD FY 2010 Approved Budget provides funds for ongoing care of the Mangroves, including the services of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Funding for the task includes $102,400 of money from the County (Fund 111). At our next meeting. I would appreciate an update from staff on the status of Mangrove Care and Restoration. Also, the status of any necessary permitting for this fiscal year and next. Thanks, Mike Levy 1 of 1 2/3/2010 11:29 AM by LR 16 '1 A 9 What's Going On? At the BCC meeting of January 26, 20 I 0 Commissioner Coyle stated that he has no intent of interfering with the rights of citizens to petition. That was not the point. Clam Bay is in the county. The Pass has been designated "non-navigable" for decades. No improvements have been made. Under these conditions the commissioners should be concerned for the safety of all users and to protect the conservation area by maintaining the designation provided by NOAA. Commissioner Coletta stated that this was the worse demonstration of democracy because the issue will be decided by the people with the most money. This is the worse but for the wrong reason. The wrong is the abuse by the county in its appointment powers and permitting staff to run wild with an unjustified costly project. The commissioners fail to recognize that Seagate was developed over fifty years ago and has the same rights now as when first developed. Why didn't the developer provide the access then that Seagate desires now? Seagate let twenty years pass without any changes, when the Federal Government passed the Clean Waters Act in 1972. Under the law all owners, whether county or private, had to protect Clam Bay. At the same time Westinghouse purchased the 2100 acres and submitted a plan to develop Pelican Bay. Public hearings were held giving Seagate and the county ample opportunity to propose changes. Government agencies required the Clam Bay conservation area be deeded to the county and the county declared it a "Natural Resource Protection Area". It is the only one on the developed coast making it a unique demonstration of development and the environment in hannony. Both the Conservancy and the Audubon side with Pelican Bay in opposing the county plan. In the approval process the County was also given over a half mile of sandy beach now Clam Pass Beach with a parking lot and land for parking at Vanderbilt Beach. When the county wanted to build a garage at Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay gave them permission to build. There would have been a garage at Clam Pass Beach also but the Seagate residents protested and Pelican Bay sided with them. The county should make that request again. Since the inception of Pelican Bay there have been periodic requests for navigation signs. The type of navigation sign was never defined but did lead to the instaIlation of canoe trail markers and information signs. When Bay Colony was being developed, a mangrove die-ofl' occurred. The PBSD took the initiative with WCI, then the developer, and the county, to have reputable consultants draft a successful plan to restore and protect the mangroves. In the preparation of the plan some residents wanted to eliminate all power boats in Clam Bay. Seagate protested and the county past ordinance 96-16 recognizing the rights of Seagate to use the waters with certain restrictions. The ten year permit also included the following language "The use of motorized watercraft is not prohibited, and evidence of periodic use of such is evident from observation. For the most part, the accwnulation of sediments and the shoaling that has taken place has resulted in physically limiting accessibility of Clam Bay to deeper draft boats and particularly those equipped with engines. Most, if not all, of the motorized boat traffic is believed to originate in the Seagate residential area and be confmed to the area from Outer Clam Bay to Clam Pass." ...." Appropriate notification, signage and policing will be provided by the county"..... "Finally, the main channel will be marked in Page 1 of 2 Submitted by T. Raia 02/01/2010 1611 A 9 accordance with the requirements imposed by the United States Coast Guard to insure that those who use the system clearly know where the channel is and the prohibition against operating their water craft outside the same." (Lateral navigation signs do not prohibit users from operating outside the same. Only regulatory signs would do that.) The county manager used this last quote to convince the commissioners that lateral (red/green) navigation signs had to be installed. This was not the interpretation of the PBSD who claimed the appropriate signs were only the regulatory and information ones. By now the PBSD had completed 90% of the work for a second 10 year plan and prepared to install new canoe trail markers along with the information and regulatory signs. The county claimed we could not close out the fIrst permit because we were not in compliance since the "required" lateral navigation signs had not been installed. The county then removed the care of Clam Pass form the PBSD in order to pursue their agenda. The US Army Corps of Engineers was queried as to what type of navigation signs was required. The written reply was as follows: "Yes, the placement of the non-lateral information signs and the canoe trail markers by the Pelican Bay Services Division does satisfy the requirement referred to in the Department of the Army permit. No, the Corps defmition of navigability does not require the placement of lateral navigation signs that denote safe passage as defmed by NOAA for navigability." The county misrepresented their claim and refuses to acknowledge this communication. In the mean time approvals by the Department of Environmental Protection and the Fish and Wildlife Commission have been rescinded. The actions of the county beg the question, "Why is the county doing this?" The commissioners voted to proceed with bringing the issue before the Governor with a cap of $3,000 dollars of out of pocket expenses. What was not included in the discussion was the contract order modification for the "Clam Bay Bypassing" project signed January 20, 20 I 0 by project manager, Gary McAlpin. This is a contract with PBS&J that started at $25,060.00 and is now up to $125,700.00 with no end in sight. PBS&J is a consulting company whose highest officials have been involved in illegal political contributions. Should county residents be concerned that a company that was not adverse to giving illegal contributions may not be adverse to providing the type of consulting report the project manager wanted? A review of the PBS&J Clam Bay report would raise a reasonable concern. The "Clam Bay Bypassing Project" suggests what's behind the scene. This was an early proposal to dredge and it is not only the pass but worded for the entire bay. Seagate immediately joined because they saw a way of getting deep water access. This dredging would allow much larger boats to enter Clam Bay while increasing the value of their property. The next phase could be to open the connection between Outer Clam Bay and Venetian Bay forever legitimizing the claim that Clam Bay extends all the way to Banyan Road. The opening would allow back and forth flushing and mixing of the waters thus diluting the pollution south ofSeagate and hopefully meeting the minimum standards. But that's not all. Any funding would be charged to the Tourist Account since the dredged sand would be used to replenish Clam Pass Beach. The commissioners should come clean and tell the public what is going on. Commissioner Coletta expressed the desire to bring the reluctance of Pelican Bay to cooperate before the Governor, but somehow I doubt that entire true story will be told. Page ::' of 2 Submitted by T. Raia 02/01/2010 COMMUNITY FORUM Community electioflS At the January 6 Pelican Bay Services Division meet- ing, 15 to20ownersmay have been present. For the benefit of the remaining 6,500 who were not, I want to stress the importance of the Founda- tion and PBSD elections. I have tried to move the PBSD to represent the residents of Pelican Bay before the Commissioners to express our concern over actions the county manager has taken since he took control ofOam Bay. I have been thwarted by the PBSD administrator, our chairperson and now by a five to three vote of the Board. Theadversariesclaim that we were directed not to be involved in Clam Bay. The PBSD must r€mamsUent and leave it to the Foun- dation. By ordinance, the PBSD is an advisory board to the commissioners to ad- vise them of the concerns of residents of Pelican Bay. This responsibiW:y overrides the county manager's direc- tive. The commissioners are being misinformed nnd we Cl.:re being misrepresented. Clam Bay is threatened, as are our beach and property values. We deserve to know why the county insists on installing navigation signs in a non-navigable Nature Resource Preservation Area when they are not required. Why was PBS&J engaged to perform a flawed and negatively ske\':led !tepor~ on Clam Bay? This will be on the agenda of the Bee January 26 meeting and the PBSD should have ti..me as a representative body of Pelican &y to speak on their behalf. His notemmgh to say you are for the mangroves. Action is required because Clam Bay cannot save itself. What is your position on [his important issue? The PBSD has been marginal- ized and it is now up to the Fotlnda rion. Please support Bill Car-penter and Bob Uek for the Formdation and John Domenie for the PBSO with your vote. - Ted Raw North Noples Fire Control and Rescue District North Naples is fortunate to have conunitted profes- sionals whodesireto provide the absolute best medical care for its residents. I atn, however, con- cerned about re- cent comments that have been made which may undermine the confidence our Community has in its providers. First and foremost we have a great team of professionals thatstrivetoprovidethebest service as efficiently as pos- sible. It is unforhmate, how- ever, we find ourselves in a public relations tug of war which really is misplaced. I read Dr. Tober's recent guestcommentarywithgreat interest and was surprised to read that Dr. Tober believes that 85% of the time EMS arrives first or within one minute of an ALS Engine in North Naples. In fact, 60% of the time North Naples Fire and EMS arrive at the same time or within one minute of each other. Unfortunately;. the other 40% of the time NorthNaples Firewason the scene minutes before EMS. This is because EMS covers www.pelicanbay.org the entire County and can- not control when and where medical emergencies occur. That is why it is so impor- tantto have ALS Engines in the system. This is what keeps our combined emer- gency response system a "world class system". If you think about it, if North Naples Fire is on scene 40% of the time before EMS, that means 2,400 people a year in North Naples are initially addressed by North Naples Fire. Forhmately, both North Naples Fire and Dr. Tober agree that early Basic Life Support (BLS) is critical to quality pre-hospital care. AU of our firefighters are certi- fied and trained to provide BLS care, which can be com- pleted within two minutes. What's even better news is that North Naples Fire also haswell-trained,experienced state certified paramedics that can provide Advanced Life Support (ALS) care im- mediately upon arrival. In order to maintain a quality emergency response team, it just makes more sense to have firefighters cross- trained as paramedics. This way, when EMS has conflicts with emergendes, we still have qualified state certi- fied paramedics available in what can be hfe or death situations. Unfortunately, this system is in jeopardy be- cause in Collier County, un- like any other County in the state, a paramedic must also be "Tober certifit>d" in order to practice. Frankly it does not matter that a paramedic works for the Fire Depart- mentor EMS, thatparamedic is still a paramedic I appreciate Dr. Tober's desire to provide the best service possible for this com- munity and in fact join him in those efforts. That is why we have worked 50 hard to recruit good paramedics and place them in service in North Naples. Many of our paramedics work not only for North Na.ples but other agencies in this community as pai"amedics at> well. What is odd about Collier County is that we have firefighter paramedics that when they are on duty with the Fire De- partmentare decertified. and cannal: assist, but the next continued on page 28 1611 A 9 ... 5 YEAR WINNERS 2009 BEST IN CLIENT SATISFACTION .":a ,~ Ilk Pelican Bay Residents ,~ ,"-/[ 'i" .' ,"""J". ~~~h~ ~.~, Carlysle 903 9th Floor, 3 bedroom, 3 bath. Classic decor by CoMins & Dupont. Updated kitchen, Shows beautifully. Includes a Cabana. $2,395,000 Calais D401 wow view of lake and Golf Course. 3 bedrooms plus office. Updated kitchen. Short walk across the street tD the Tram. $750,000 Call for a private showing: Jane Darling Sharon Kiptyk 239.290.3112 239.777.3899 Or Emall her at: Or EmaH her at: janedarllngOmsn.com kiptykOmsn.com m €I ..~ Pelican Bay Post, Early February 2010 III A9 RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2010 "ofimrty~~ Halss - !1enhlflg NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUAR=W: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD WILL HOLD A PUBLIC WORKSHOP MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 10 AT 1.00 PM AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY LOCATED AT 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34108. 1611 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION Municipal Services Taxing and Benefit Unit AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Audience Participation 3. Budget Calendar 4. Review FY 2010 Operations Forecasting and Projected Outline of FY 2011 Operating Budget 5. Discuss Capital Project Future Expenses 6. Discuss Monthly Financial Report. 7. Audience Comments 8. Adjourn ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIOENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ANY PERSON REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS AT THIS MEETING BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHOULD CONTACT THE DIVISION OFFICE AT (239) 597-1749 AT LEAST FIVE CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. .,iiSC C,.0f,(8.: .,.I!.t: '-~'-~"~,..:~......"..".. iier~l '# _.-:"..-...'<,..-....-.,"'-.~ 16 , 1 A9 , Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division Water Management Operating lJel'artmenl Review of V\' 21109 Budget to Adoul, FY 1010 f'oreeasting, n 2011 I'rcliminary Gudgd Outline Revenue As..,,>c-ssmcnts Intcrest Lncome: Devc1o~r Phlll H"vic'W" Mi$l:elhmcous In~:mm: PrioE' Year t~,~ndIUlfl::; CarrY!lJfWanJ Total Revenue~ Appropriations: Administration Rl.:gular Sal;.lric:; ER 457 CorHril1ulinns (Hher Salark~ ;-ml1 Wage" Tel1ninalion f'a: I:{c'~l.:'rVe hlf::-i,ilury Ad,! Sucial SCt:unt) M:lh.:hing Hctiremcnl Ileallh InsufalH.:c I ,ire Insur..tm:e Worker's C\llupen::>atuln Sub-IOLaI: Indirect Cosl Reimbursement ()ther Cnnlnu:tual Servic(:s lcJeplwne - Service Contract Telep!woe . Dircd Line Postuge, Frei&ht, tif'S Renl "' Building lnl,mnation rech ,'\utom,llio!l A Insnmncc - ( Icnend R<:nt Equipment Priming (Outs:iJe) Legal Adverfismg fntcrJcpt Payments Rl~C()fding h:(> (HIke Supplie:; I'omputer Snftwar~~ Otht.~r EducUli'1nal Sub-local '\ddirionaJ -,I'uhlk Ketat!ons Suh-i{)~ill 'rota! Administrahn: Reui,,'ed Anticipated ToIlll Proposed H21141'1 FY ZOO') n 2010 Expt'nded Mar.!Sept. Received n 2011 Bud..t Actual Bud-.t \' ear -T o~Dnt.t 20111 ':,oend.d Bud..t $66 L4DO <;6,8, I 5' $74.2,500 $6N,6!.1 S80,IKK) $"1(19,614 $14J.5IXI $Il,6{)O $16,208 $11.8,"1 $340 th,SOO $6.8-1-0 $14,100 $1,jOU $0 $1,500 ,\0 ~I) sn ~UUO $0 $7,5.il $0 $RI $0 $81 $0 $0 $1 $0 'to $0 $0 $1) SIJLOOI) $1 $0 S(J $0 SI) SO SlI08,5t10 $661,899 $755 800 'S6.Jii.OJ5 $86,500 $716 $759,100 - - SJlL900 $2!,6tXl $28,000 $9,6tJ2 $18]08 $e8.0ll0 $28,001) ~20n $0 $200 $U $21fO $200 Sll10 S13.0U $0 $0 $Il $0 SO $0 $0 $1) $0 $0 $0 $4..115 $IJ $U $0 SO SO $0 SUO() $ 1.555 $],200 $71l SU8? $2,200 $2.200 S4Jl65 $2,1,6 $3,200 $t)S5 $,2.245 S32lXl $3.200 $K.700 $K,71l0 $J(l.6!10 $0 $10.601) $10.600 $ Hl.600 $30" $300 SIOO $0 $HX) $IO() $ Hill $100 $19 $200 $0 $100 $201) $200 $:59,900 MlAll $445()O $11.361l $Jl141) $44.5()() $44.5()O 'liI08.bOtJ SlIlS,6!X) $1I7.6()0 ~58.3()() $58.8!X1 $117.61111 $117.600 SJ7,l()(1 $20, 78lJ $21 Jill) ~4,7011 $!tJ,600 $2UlIO $21.JOU $6'X) $336 $hOIl $0 $35() :B50 $6011 $SJ1(){) 'fLi.t, $3.'1Ml $9.30 1iL5(}j) \2.4Hl $.~.'iOn $5_700 '!il.hYO HIIIIO $II $2.700 $2.741 $1.0011 $\ I 100 $IU41 $11 IIMI $f!.245 FIIO() ~1 L245 $1 I. I O() HIIX) $1) $4llX) ~2,05n $~.O50 ~'IJ(K) $4JOO SLJOO $98IJ $17.901) $11 $1".1,900 $17_YOO $ 17,9!X) S2.304! $2JJTl $LWO $(j 'S2,O() $.2..300 $2,500 S1.301l $1.056 $2300 $150 S30IJ 'ii1.050 $2300 $1000 $1151 l;l,OI~) $0 ~J.,2I)O SI 21X) $2.00() $::tU'10n \10.(lOO $() tn '&0 SO $0 $2"0011 $11 $2.0(10 to $ 1,l}OO 1l1.1I00 $::!,OOO 'S]_){)(I $6n.-1 $4.261 'Il2J~7 'ill.200 $3.:267 $1.500 SO $0 'fin SO SIJ $1. IOU $U74 $1.I1Xl $llJ3 $500 ~6uJ $LIIMI - $20' lOO $1 74JKMl $19H161 'P5_JR6 $111_900 $1871)86 $19151H1 $U $0 $13.J(MI $0 $0 $0 $18,3lXI $107 300 $1 74JIOO -$21ITo1---$75J8h --$111.901\-- $Ino~~ " I ';2fll)_ROn $lh7,200 S22ULl I 5.155Jk>l $86.540 $1-15.1140 $2J I,5X6 $254..10') - 1611 A9 Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division Water Management Operating Department Review of FY 2009 Budget to Actual, FY 2010 Forecasting, FY 2011 Preliminary Budge! Outline Field Services: Regular SalarIes ER 457 ConlnhutiOn::; Re5t'r\'~ For Salary Adjustm\:n1 O....ertime ~ol;ial Sccuru:y Matdling Rcguhu Rt'.:1ircment Health In3unU1CI.~ ! ill: lnstlf1ltKc \'Vnrkds t,'ompf.:rt..;atlnn Suh~luttll Engill~l'Ting l'l:e~ Plan t{c<;iev> Fees Olher Cllnlral.ilwl Service'> rrec I"rinulling l c01porary Labor S\~ak t\laint<::mmcc "Vater Quality lcsting(lnd Pay'l rckphon~$ I Includes Cclluhtr) I"m"h & Garbage Disposal ln~llra1H:c ~ <icncml Insurance. Auto i\UWS 1 ruck:'> R!\t I abur - Fleet \1aint. (iSFl I'led Maint Prut:s lIed Niln t\..lrlint I<;;;F Part.; Hoa!. R&M (lthcr Equip_ ll&M I inihlrm Purc;lasc & Rcnlal h:rtilizcr, llcrbicid<:$, Chml Replanting Program I-'uel & Lubrk;U1ts Outside Fud & LuoriuJlHS" 1!1::iiJr Oth.:r Operaling Supplies PCf"';onal Sate!) Equipmcnl Sub~l"li.d Received Anticipated rotal Propu,ed F~ 200'. n 2009 n 2010 Expended MlIf.!Sept. Rectived FY 20 II Bodo.' Actual Budo.. \:'car~To<-Date ZOtl'l "'....ded Bud... $76,200 $80,670 $79.400 $27.467 $.\I.'Hl $7~.400 $7~,4ml $100 'S16~ $700 $i9 $MI $70<) S70Q $11646 ~) 'SO $0 SO $0 $0 $lh,;IOO 'GltdOO $15AOO $1'1,157 '{;4,Hl $1 5300 $15.400 $o7,toO $7,IHI 'P,JOO $2A41 U.35R $7.300 S7.300 $10,054- $1),,) 71 )1 i,OOO $7,0\1 1;::1,9-6& $11,000 $IIJ}OO $10.200 $26,mO $31.700 $0 $j L100 $}1,700 $]1.700 $500 'S5~ln $.200 $11 $:200 $200 1::200 .._---1!..5011 __2h!.!.l. _-: '\..2.(1){; SO $2,90(' ,$2,9110 $2,900 ~15:L600 $141.7!'SO $1 41t60n -~~ $i05.,t8J-'--fi:'8.f)()O -$ 1 48J,OIl - 11:1';,1100 $ In,.:! 1(1 $12.001} W ~!'2,OOO $11,000 $ll,()l)O $1,500 ~7_lO >1\00 MI '$0 $0 $L500 $51 800 $2K,~h9 $1.0110 $272 5500 $772 $L!}(}(l $0 10 $27 ,600 $2.4Q6 $27JlOiJ \29>.4% $.lOJlml $-12.400 $42.m1U SJ2A(}() $1 ,t2~7 $28j)()O $+2,287 $42-400 $I1.(}()O $13,5(10 $11.000 $0 S ItOOO SI-I.mlll $11,000 $ J 4.100 $18J137 't;2 L1 00 $1.974 ~!9500 $21,474 $22.60t) $1.1)00 $678 $jUU 1114 1;100 $444 $500 1: I '.L]OO $'1,79tl $8..\OU $3..)] 1 $jlOU $8,8!1 $8JI}() $:3500 $,l.500 $2.60(j '!iO $211()O $2,600 $2.600 $4.600 '$4.1100 $HOO $0 ~1,N)O \3,600 $3,600 $500 III $U 10 1i{) $0 $900 $1_000 $qq(j $0 '!io -SO $0 'tl1.OOil $3.000 1161"1 HlOO $un--l 'li2.5\JU $4..1H $.6un $200 ~)(J2 $0 'ilO 'SO $0 $1.100 S500 $0 $0 '\ill 1JO $0 $jl}() $1.500 $0 $1,500 $0 $[,000 $1,000 $1.50U $1.900 $1,R69 $1.9(Jj) $1.705 ~50f) $2.265 SUllO $Ill 100 $'19009 ')98AOO ~Jl,602 $64.0no .S96.602 $98,4l}(1 $U $0 $8.500 SO $8..51)0 S8,lOO $lUOO 'SO SO SO $0 '!;o $0 SO $.L100 $17.16 $2.000 $71.1 $1500 $2.2 II $2,0(}() .~1.3.500 1i20.90fl $2,.'500 $L51O $1000 $.:L530 $2500 $0 $0 $500 $0 $500 $:500 $j(}() -'-QillOO--'~i1]7 ,n09 _. $~5,t4O"i)---' --i67J.948 --$fQ2:5OiJ-. $i~q,448 $157500 1611A9 ~ Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division Water Management Olleraliug Dellnrtmeut Ueview elf F" 200\1 Budget to Actunl. FY 2010 Foreca.'tiug. FY 2011 Prelimina'1' Budget Outliue o Capital Outla~' Building Improvement:> Improvements (icnentl (Mm. Fa Other/Ort: M<:./.:h & Et.\uip./ l'rw..: Sllb-tnml Tohtl f-"ield Servicn; Other fl'eei & (::hinges la,-;Colk"CtOl Pnlpe.rt) Appmi:>t'r Rev(:!luc Iksl..T'vl.: Total Other Fees & Churge:;J: Tobll Apprupriatlons: -. Received Anticipated Total Proposed F\" 2009 F't 2009 n lOW Expended Mar.JSept. Received FV 2010 Budllet ActuII Budllet 'r ear..'lo-()Jlte 2llO9 t:xDendled Bud..! $IJ.2UO $2_IOU $0 $0 SO $0 , '520.445 )lJ 1",,\ 1iLUO(J 1>K2]! $3_000 1;11.232 $13.2IKl $34.2UO '$34.1110 $1.000 $0 $\) $0 $1.111I0 $67JU5 '1i44,J':!:5 ')ll.2011 $!LlJ.! HUOO $11.132 $14.200 $513.745 $428.114 $4! 7,200 S112.197 $300.98.1 $413.280 $420,.300 '1>20.500 $12.tl5-l $13.000 $IL6'i5 '\)0 $12.655 $2J,OOO $lO,7tJO $11,06.1 $:22,400 $1 LI Mj 'SO $11.185 $22.400 - $34.800 $1 _ $)9.1J02-.._.___.~___.____?!'-__~ $l9.100 $76,1K10 $24.317 $84.400 $23.84U $0 $2},840 $84500 L $856.945 $673.844 $757.461 $222,6tD $44h.013 $668.706 $759,100 . - "'--- Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division 16 J 1 A 9 Communily Beautification Operating Department Revie" of FY 2009 Budgello Actual, FY ZOIO Forecasting, ~'Y 2011 Preliminary Budget Outline Rcve-nut' Assessments Interest Inl:omc MiS\:cllaneou.s R~~imburse Pi'\' Expend ('urrythrward Total Revenue: .4.ppropriatiolls: Administratioa: Rl.":gular Salari.:~ FR 45'1 ClmlributloIlS Cnhl.:f ";<IIt1rie~ & Wages I ,::nnination Ila\ Rcst:T\c F')I" "aJary AdJusT .'iodal SCl:unly Rettrement f ka!th InsurL:lCc 1.lfe lnsuranCl~ \\i\lr"ds Compensation Sub iutal Inti] J'C"dll1olog.) A.ulomallun ,'\Un Other C'ontfactuul Sl'TV Beeper:: Tckphont: Po:-;tagt:> Freight, UPS Rt;nt . Buildings I{t:f1t " Lquipmcnt InSUf<UlCe - O;;::ncral Data Pro\: Lq R&M Printing & Binding L\.':gal Advcnbing RL:imb. For Prior Y car C'krk R(.':corJlng Fl~C"" OITln.' Supplk::, COJ1~illg Ch;lrgo:.'s ~v1il1or Onkc hiP! iHl,cr Operating Supplies rruiIlin~ & hlucatJon Sur..total: -\ddltional-PLhlic Rclutinrb. [,cgu Sub-,!Iltal r.) Z009 Bud'2et -,=-~=,~===" 1" 20U9 Actual t \- 2010 lIud..t $ LhOO.OflO $lj.t:L9.H $1,922.500 $3:U{){) SJlJ,D8f $28700 $0 $0 ;;0 'SO 'S2i2 '$0 'l\.29L600 $( ($10,000) $1,924.9\X)-ST.583,8h3 $1,9412<10 'S.~O.200 S\K&21 S28,YOO $20U ii\ ,'\)200 ;;0 'II \,10' $0 $1, $0 $0 $4,5SJ ~n 'tu $3,200 'bL!2'1 t1.200 $1)\,17 $1,854 ii3,.100 $8.,700 S~.~IOfl SIO.600 $Jlltl $100 $1110 $100 . ~~ >.-_ $300 ~N $}$'--'-S47.U,; --~4:lJ';iOO $.1,200 $4f:d)On $4tX) $:'U)(1i) "115,500 $11400 $~,40Cl '[.,5tlO $0 $2,600 $1JlOO $0 \2))00 $JJHJO $0 $0 $U $4,500 $9LI<XI $0 $9LltXJ lobi t\dministrative: $150,200 to iI..UOO $27."142 'l;,:.lU100 $.:1 ~H $,1 UO $!,l.l1 '!Il,500 $18,' nOm) SlIM(- $\ LWn $2J19 $2Alltl $37.1 $500 $1 $0 :)Il iI:1.hOtl $752 $2.000 $1} $0 $0 $2.000 $11S ~"1.774 $1 Il)O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $205 $1,500 $4 7,888 $66,nl $I)t--, $16,900 $47,888 $81,174 $95Jl2jC$l2&.774 R-rcei\le6 ":1 pended 'Iur-'I().-Datt $1 tdO.925 1l}j'71 SO $0 $0 -$1.631,796 $t).'}g6 l>{) $il $il ~O $11.\ $tJ:.'{-t 'So SO $0 $11, 705 $1. IOU $5,212 $0 $9.10 $1' $\.511 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11 $U $2.029 $0 1;0 $0 $(1 $1 S 817 $f) 11:1:\817 -$27521 Antidpaled l\1ar.!S~I}t. ZOIU $lOU,OOO ~12.000 $(1 }IJ $0 -, $212.000 $11LL)14 $''::Oil $!i $0 $u $1.465 $7J if> $10,6(10 tlOn $..Hifl $,n.3')~ $2,1110 S:U.OOil }2fJO $1.700 $],91)t) $"i7!JO $2_ 000 'So $0 $\,iUIO $1000 $0 $1.500 '$900 .$0 $11 'f;O $800 $42,860 $0 $42860 $76,755 Total Rei..<eived E.u.uded 1;])00.915 $)2,871 $0 $11 $0 S1843.796 $!K.9UO $200 $0 $0 'So $2,200 'flJ :100 $10.600 $lUO IlOO $.:l."' 6()f} $A..200 '{.21L:1l $160 $2.t:30 $2.Qt2 $IU.14 '!t2.000 l>{) $0 $I,(H'O $1.000 50 $1.500 $2,929 $() $0 $0 $SOl) 558,677 $0 $58,677 $104,277 Propoud H 2011 8ud..t $1,891.700 ',H,lmJ $0 'bO ($10.11001 $1.916 om) $28,900 $200 $0 $0 $0 $2,200 $JJuo $IOJiO() $100 $JUO .-.------i4'i6on $-L!OO ~Z8.000 $400 $],500 HOllO $11.4'"' $2,000 5500 $0 ill,bOO ~2.000 \0 $2,000 $3,000 ,0 $0 SO $U1X) $64,71)() $16,91.) $81,600 .$127,200 l' I 1 A 9 Collier County Pelican Bay Senices Division Community Beautification Ope,'ating Ocpartmcnt Revie.. of FY 2009 Budget to Actual, FY 2010 Forecasting. FY 2011 l'reliminary Budget Outline Received An~jl'ipSlled Total Proposed n !O(){) F\ 2009 n 20\0 l':.xpeodtd MarJSept. Recei\.'ed n 2011 Bud d Actual Bud et Vear-'fo-Datt 2010 El oded Bud .1 Field Service:s: !~~gul:tr Salaries $417 100 $136,891 ~,I,I.UOO $!S:'UJ.04 $2Rl},I% $444.200 $444200 E~ 4~ 7 (:ontrihutions $2"20U $,1.,\'!O $2,10(J $2.!U \1.\)80 $2.200 $2.200 Overtime 'iIHUOO $109,1.0 $lil2.600 $16.3.11 Shfd64 'SIO}.hUlJ $102.600 l~csC'rvc For Salary A.djust $49,]76 $0 $0 $0 $\1 $0 $0 Social S~curjt> 11-42,500 $39,8113 $41,900 $1.i.R60 $2.HJH!I $41.900 S41,900 Rellrement Regular $57,.114 $5),m3. $6~.IOO $1 8.846 $4.L!54 $63,100 $01. lOll Health Insuranl:t: $9tJ.:WO $9tdOO $116,1()4) $0 $1 Hl.!~l() $116,100 $1 10, 1 ()4) Lik In,,ur:UJ.ce $nOO $'100 $1.600 $0 $1.ofHl $l,WO $1.600 ,^"orlo..~r'-; Cornpt:nsution $24,900 ,$1.127 $J5,[jOO $0 $J5.0UO $30 .U<lO $.\5,OUO Sub-total $81.1.200 $139,IOS 'il8()b.700 $124.26 I $581,439 $801.,700 $l!Oh.700 Fngillet."Ting FeeS $ti $1 'iO $0 $0 $0 $0 Waler US\: Charg:t~s $K2.ltHl $S.I '712 'MnJWll $.;l~'h..j. $47.500 $81.2M $&U()() Replanting Frognun $4fJ}}(lti MU.98i '546.600 $28,266 'S15.1\(1l) $532h6 $51,600 Other Contra(Jual SaVicl"S $.lUIY.I 'ill ,1Og $2tf,iOO \; 14.h60 $1' OOD $2b.66n $29,5UO In.'c lrimmmg. $2500D S2L~52 $25.000 SJI.09:5 \15tlO $J]Yi'i $30.000 Pt:~-L Cmllfoi 1)1),51)0 'Sil..P) 'i)f'L)OO so ~).UOli '!i<;,000 $6.500 T CmpIH~J.ry Labor $126.000 i70l).233 liJ 11800 '\;58.899 $1'Hl.IliiO $ll)8.K99 $204500 Ml1lnr PlllJI i~cnta! $gOI) 'b,:).i $/(Ofl 1i!lb 'S:HJi) $5J6 'j;~Otl Cdlul:lr Tekphonc $-UJOli $UH '\iUWO tl.().lO $2,100 ~JJ 40 $J.20Ij f)oslagl", Frdghl & liPS $1) ~Il ~IJ ~Il 'to ~n $0 Ekctril:ityi\.lilitii."~ $,ZJllll) $lA56 $:,.400 $1 \ \4 'i>1_900 $3.UI9 $3.400 I ra.:-h & tJarhagc $3'1.l)(Kl $16,.$,l $24,1;)00 $6..124 $lb,IWO $21.32:1 $1.1.900 R~nt t:quillmcnt ';8,500 $5, H,\ ~8,;1X) S2.116 $JJltlO $3,516 $7.5lHl lnsur;mc<: ~ i ientTal $8.,'-lOO $6-.288 $12,200 $0 f,O ,0 $12,200 In:--urunn.: - '....ehid..: $II.JOO $11,100 $Q,3UO $0 $0 $0 $9,300 Sprinkler Sysocm M;:linL $JO,Ot)o $.:.11.109 $HLOOO $5.18. $25.000 $.10.1.8 $3(),(XIO landscaping Mainl $hi,5U(j $55.'114 $60.20n ';28753 'i32,OOO $00:7:;] $00.200 Auto & Truck R&M $100 So $11 $0 '!iO $0 ')(UO I'kt=t ~\-'lainl ISF Lahor $ll.2fJO $12.2D4 SO $0 'SO ~II $'.9iXI Fhxt t\1aint ISF Parts $1 !,3Cll $'1.1.11 $29A1)0 $11.819 $17.iO(l $29.319 $1 noo r kid Mainl Non-ISl- Pain \901) $899 $0 $(1 $0 $1) $900 IlumLani~ \.Yilma Exp.:mlltuflcS $0 $0 $0 itO $0 50 $11 (lth~r Fljuip R&l\-l $2.0(;(J SIIl.O&H $0 $0 1;U $0 $2.0$0 l.i.:cnsC's& Permit:-; $SI)!) $.0 $800 1i.\41l MHO $740 $800 {iniform Pu.l.:ha<;c~ & Rental loJ1,nOIl $IIIlQ( $12.000 $2.1'1 $7_lilO $9.,171 $7.200 F~:rl. Herbil.:iJ~s & Chem $4X,5II(] $h1.86t $5~U(}O $28.35S 'SJ'i.OOO ~6J.J'i5 $62.01~) Fud & Lubricants.. Oul'{id\: $0 HI\! $0 $0 $iI ,,0 $0 'tlllil Fuel &. luhricant" ISF $52JJOO $31.81. $41_100 $10.305 $15 JltXj $15,31)5 $4 7 JXJO J\'linur Opcnlling EqUl}) ")J.O(l!l $J7.jt~ HOOO $1 1-;'1 $181\0 $2.Q55 $3,000 IJlhr:r Operating Supplic.; "$J !,jhll $U 14.1 $IUOO $7.6.\11 $7.500 $15,130 $1 UOO Per,,-onal ~a.;~ty Fquipmcm $3.\100 $Q4 $.3.noo $:'3': \2.000 $2_531 nooo I:)aillt Supplie~; SI..iUr) ~.78 'S1.50{) $0 $1,500 $UOO $1,500 1 rank Sign,; 'S'10UO $3J,20 n(~m $"i30 $1.000 $2.530 $.1.01\0 LhtOK:; & I'llbJic;alion5 $l) $0 $1\ $" $11 $1\ $0 uthn r rai I \ L ng.! Fd Ul.:a1i nnal $ll $,10 $0 1;259 $0 $.259 $0 l..lutHolal P 44 90" $70:\l}8b $726,li)ll $275.1.'16 $412,HKJ $687,236 $725,900 '\dditllHlul . Mukh Heqlllrcmenb ;) 1 'inOll $0 $0 $0 $3..l1~1 S\JtHolal - 'i744-:-9O'I' $705986 -$729.400 $275,136 $412.100 $6872 36 $729.2(~1 'f ot31 Field Service,,: $1.558.101\ $1. 1,516.100 $499,397 S994.5J9 $1.4Q3,931. r $1,535,1:)00 1611 A9 Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division Commonity Ik'llutilication Ol>erating Department Reyiew of F'I' 200'1 Budget tv Actual, FY 2010 Forecasting, F\' 2011 Preliminary Budget Outline Rt<ceived Anticipated Tornl Pruposed F' 2009 F\ 20W> F\ 2010 E (pended MarJSept. Recei\"ed n 2011 Budeet Actual Bud..' tear- To-Dati 2010 L.-nded Bud..' CapitalOutlMy: Huikiing Improvements $11600 Hl,IK9 1.1t&O{) ')UdS $11 ,IXI '!iU,O(.Il} $LLi\IJO Improvements. (,eneral $0 $ $11 $0 $0 $(J $0 Autos &. Tru(k~. $22,000 $22, ~O5 $16,OO() $25.<162 'So $25--462 $28.000 Other Mach, &; EqUIp. $I,OO{) $( $25,OOil ~lb.o80 $9JJj)() $25.080 $11.000 Total Capital Outlay. - $36.6iXl $35394 $04.600 $013,160 $20.4XI $63.641 I $58.6(liJ Other Fees & Charges Property Appraiser $,1-6,JmJ $2-\~60 S.52.lWO 'illS,764 SO $28764 lax CollectOl S"9.50(J $.\0.981 $59.500 $.Jl."i43 '!;U $012.54\ Revenue Rc':'cI'\rc $lH,201] '$0 tiOLOOO SO 'to $0 Tout Other (i'ces & Charges: -$'t8o.oon-'..-- $.5&:941 -, l;',:f 133~i;61307 '_._._~..~"~~O.,- $61,307 rutal Apprupriatinns: $L9'14.1"OO $1.632,539 (}l3l42.774 ~63L\86 $1.091.7"'5 $i,723.161 $52,300 $58.600 $q.::),TOO "--'-'--'--- $21Q 60t,- I $1.932..100 ...._.~.r__~'___'_,.,__~__ 1611 A9 Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division Street Lighting Fund Review of FY 2009 Budget to Actual, f1l 2010 f1'lfel'asting, FY 2011 Preliminary Budget Outline Re,.cnue Current Ad valorem la'\cs Interest Income (\,tlscellancous 1 ncomc Carryfllfwanl Tutal Revenue: '\ppropriation~ Administration' Regular Salafle~ ER 457 Contril~utiollS Other Salaries & Wage~i lerminalion PeLY Hesenc For Salar): Adjust Sm:ml St'curin 1\.-hllt;hing PBSr I RdirCflll'nt 'Workl'r's Compt:llSatitlll Lile {n~lInm;T Suh-hllal llldirt~ct CO"ii1 Rellnb. Other Conlnlt:wal Services Idcphon~~ . Service Contr,ll:b f'e1ephonc -. Dircd Line PO:-;Ulgt:, Freight liPS Rent. Building Rent ~ Fqlllpmcnt R;;:imbursc pl'y' I-'xp<:nd J nsura.ncc - (kl1~ral lulo Il':.CIHwlogy Autmnation Alh Offil..,t'Supplie<.; Copying Ch.argc.; Minnr Office Equipm....nt Other Operalmg :Suppli\':s Sub-total AddiltilflaJ..Public Rclatinn "iuh-tulaf Totlll,l\dministrlltive: - Receh'cd Antit.ipated Total Propo.lled Hlll1l9 H2tl1I9 FV lO11l Ii:xpendt'd Mar JSept. Received 2011 8ud2d .'\ctuaJ 8uda;et \,'ear..To~Dat~ 21110 EXDended Budeel $298.700 $2H 1.81 8 $235_ 1liO $Llb,<15g 1132.500 $26li,95R $2H;,8IXI $6.200 $8.488 $4 600 SilO $J.700 $3.870 $4.7(X) $0 $281 $0 $19 $0 $.19 $0 $0 $( 1-\ JOI,)) ~O $0 $0 ($.100) ~~-- $304.9flO $29Q,587 $2(01)00 $236.667 $J6,1l)(j $272.867 $29H.200 .. . $.18.9flO S\X.260 $28.000 $il. 6{t~ $18..108 $28JX)O $283100 $200 $( $100 $iJ $100 $200 $2(X) $0 $ILtl75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $(I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,2]5 $0 $0 'to $0 $0 $0 $.1.1(10 .$1 JH $2,100 PI ! $L3!P $2.100 $2.100 $1,765 'G7J7 1!l3,~O() $955 $~.24:, $3.200 $}200 $100 .$50 $200 ~Il $}OO $200 '$200 $iI)O $ltiO 1.200 ~l) $200 $200 $200 $46,400 $]/kOi $1 J 9()il-- ~I LlMl S22.540 . $.33.900 $.33900 $12.100 $12.100 $6 700 $3.350 $.lJ50 $6,700 $6.700 $.16,600 $211.71>0 S2IU{(lf) $4.700 $16,1100 $20.700 $20.800 $000 $288 SoOO $,{OO $300 $6(xJ $1500 'fiR35 $3. ion ~675 $200 $H75 $.UOO $1.0011 $11 $2,OO() $0 $500 1500 $2.000 $11.100 $11.143 $11 lOll $0.171 $5.8011 $10.973 $11.100 $2..WO $I.MJ $2300 $0 112.000 .'S2:,OUO $2.500 to $0 '~o '$11 ~O $0 $0 $-100 tJO'! $.WO $0 $0 $(J $.:1-f)O , $4.100 $0 $4.100 $2050 $2.U"5(J $4.1110 $1. 100 $500 S2Y. $2162 $ L762 $400 $2.162 $&00 $0 $(I 'Sn $11 \0 $0 $() $1000 $1 'M! $l) ilO $11 $11 $0 $0 $UJOO $0 $IO() $olOO $1.000 $71.2(Xl $47451, $54. 76:~ $17.710 $31,000 $48.710 $53.500 $0 $0 $J9.8i10 $0 $0 $0 $19.81KJ 'S74.200 $47.456 $74.:%2 $17710 $.11000 $48. 710 $7'1.\00 $120,600 $81.891 $108.162 $2Y.O 70 $5.1.540 $82.610 $107.200 1(,11 A9 Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division Str.et Ligbting Fund Review or FY 2009 Budget to Actual, FY 2010 Fore"a,ting, FY 2011l'reliminary Budget Outliue Field Mr"\iicrs: Regular Sahui.:~ LR 457 Cootributioll", ()vcrtinll.'. !{I:servc fi)( Sillut}/ Adj Sodal St:l.:.urity l\lah:hing: Rdir~mC"nt Reg.\Jlilf Li fe htmranct \\l)r/..:ert~ Compensation Vchi..:l!:: :\lh)\\'um:c Sub-lo1al: Fngineerillg h:."Cs Other ('ontradlllll Servi>:l;> (dephonc Dlri,~l.:l Cellular Phon::s E!ecU"il;:il) '\uto In).unull,l~ Insur:llli,;t: F leel Maintenance I; lcctrical Contractor LIght Bulbs HaH~1 (lther Supp\i~s Equipment Rcpai Personnel Suicly Eyuipmclll Sub~ttlfal' Addilillnal~FI~rtrid Rt:puir ''It,;'['1;i SllIHo1.al: Total Field Suvicr:s: Capi.taIOutlay: Building Impro,;cm~nlS Impro\CmCIlb - General (lthtr M,lChil~t:ry & f"quipllIent <~uh~wlal ToUI Capital Outlay: Other F'ee3 & Charges: Tax ~ 'ol]c~tm Property Appmiser Rcv'.~nu.... R.:'>Crv~ Sllb~tdal rotal Other f'ees & Charges Rer.eind Antidpated Total Proposed n 2009 n 20119 n 2010 Expended !\'Iar./Sept. Receind 2011 Budu.t Actual Bud'd \:en,.tOo-Datt! 2010 Exoended Budud S3X.8t'lU $41 159 $40,5(j{) ~llqt)5 $26,505 $4ll.5HO S40,500 S20B $165 $2\10 1,1l/ $181 $200 $200 $4.:1IH) $.t~07 \4J)OO $1,:'90 $L410 ~4,t)OO 1;4.00U $2.22," $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,-lOO $Ll41 $~.4{)n $L1 ?.... $2.2T' 'GJAOO $.J.400 $4.7'10 $4,54j' ~~.h~)jl $15U '$ ';' OtJ~ $4600 $4.6<)11 'SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.1,)1) $e2l1 $1300 $0 $t..HIO $1.100 $1300 $0 $47 $'1 .. $0 $0 $0 $0 $55.\00 $5~A82 $5.t.OOO 'li18.2h6 ~VUH $54J)()O $;4.000 $0 '\u SO ~O $0 $0 $.).000 $3.J2h $0 $0 'join $0 $1.50U $0 $811 ~I_-'OO ~O \0 $0 ~O $80t) $2Uh $HtHJ ii72 $200 $271 \5nO $4-1,200 $40.10; $4.t,]()() $lJ,~tJ1 $.10,000 $4.1. 161 S-t.tlOn '$1.300 $1.100 $1. \(I{) $0 ~O $0 SLlOO POll ~:5'~~ $XOO $U $A) 'liO $RtlO 'S1.XOtl $UBI $2.2(1l) $1,2iN $8{}1) $2.il89 $2.400 $12.20{J $9,972 .S7..llJO ,0 $7.5(/(\ $:.500 $7,JOO $20.400 $9.563 $\2..1IHi $2.609 $1l,3(1) $12,10'1 S\:!AOU r '1;200 $2AfJ4 $~OO 'tu '1;0 $0 $0 $5{}(J $0 $:;00 $0 t50tl $5011 $500 $85.100 '$69,601 $71,i_~)o $\7AJl S48.5<kJ S65.9:11 $70,70{) " $0 $0 $!-LSOl! $0 $0 ~O tI4.5<kl $85.H)O $69.60j $85.500 $17.111 '-$"48:500-" $65.93\ 'j;8'L2nn $1.0.200 $124.08.1 $lJ9.500 $3),697 $84.234 $119.93 I $139.200 $0 $0 \0 'So H) $0 $0 $J.1.2IXl $5.HO $I.L200 'f;(J $11.231 111.231 $IJ.20{) _. $l.tlOO $0 $10i)O ';0 $1.0110 $1.1100 $1.000 $14.2Ik) $5AXO $14200 $0 $12,2}1 $12.232 $14.2110 $14.100 $5.4~W $1.UOil $() $J2.232 ~ 12,2J2 $14.200 $8.100 $0 $88110 Sl}51> $0 $4.756 $lumO $5,JOO $0 $.5JWO $1..140 $0 $1.140 $5.8011 . $14.900 $0 $1500il $0 $tl $0 $15.000 $28.:100 $0 I $29.fi<H1 $;.896 $0 $5.896 $29.60n , 1-$29.600 ~'lUOO---So1 $5,89() $0 $5.896 $29.600 $"(J.663 II $220.fi6911 S290.21X1 _II Total Appropriations:. $103,3110 SII ~LS291.7b2 SllO.Dllb Current & Proposed Capital Project Funding Schedule 1611 A9 Boooet _._~ ected Pro Proiect Identification 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Pelican Bay Hardscape RenovatIons $2.099500 RefurbIshment TraffIc Slgnage $70 000 $70,000 . Lake Bank Enhancerrents $100000 $100,000 Other Charges/Fees $5,700 $18,900 $ 18,900 Total All Projects: $2,105,200 $188,900 $188,900 $0 $0 $0 , ! Funding Sources: Reserve Funds/Interest $2.049,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Reserve Funds Available: $2,049,300\ -.--.-'E- f--_..._- $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Other: I i Non-ad valorem Aeseasments $55.9001 $188.900 .~188.900 $0 $0 $0 Protected Cost per Unit 7,617 $7 _L_ $25 $25 - $0 $0 $0 , Second year funding if signs are removed & refurbished in shop. Current Funding Clam Bay Program ...- Boollel ------...-- Proiected Project Identification 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Operalions & Maintenance $170.000 Clam Bay Capital Projects $375.000 Other Charge/Fees $10,700 . Total All Projects: $555,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Sources: Reserve Funds $350,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Tolal Reserve Funds Available: $350,900 1-----+0 --.-....;::: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Other: Fund 111 $102.400 Non -ad valorem Aesessments $102,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Proiected Cos~r Unit - 7.617 $13 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . -- ---- . SUMMARY MINUTES OF THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION ADVI~O AND PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMI1TEE JOhWlftiB TUESDAY,NOVEMBER 17,2009 Coyle Coletta BE IT REMEMBERED that !be Pelican Ba,. Senices Dnisioo AdvisMy Board and the Pelican Bay Foundation St tegic Planning Committee conducted a Joint Public Workshop, Tnesday, Niovemher 17. 2tJO'} at 2:00 PM at the Community Center at Pe6can Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, with !be following members presenl: ~@a I 1JJL 'if v' Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board Members Keith Dallas, Vice Chainnan and Acting Chainnan Theodore Raia, M.D, (late arrival, 3 p,m,) Tom Cravens Mary Anne Womble, Chairwoman (excused absence) John Iaizzo Gcofliey Gibson ( excused absence) Michael Levy (early departure, 3 p.m.) Hunter Hansen (unexcused absence) Gerald Moffatt Jill Kobe (nnexcused absence) Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Members Bob Uele, Chainnan Noreen Murray Ronnie Bellone, Co-Vice Chairwoman Ralph Oblers Merlin Lickhalter, Co-Vice Chairman Carson Beadle (absent) Rose Mary Everett Mary AlUIe Womble (absent) RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2010 Board of Coun\y CorMliaaionera Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Neil Dorrill, Aclmini<lTator Kyle Lnkasz, Field Operations Manager Mary McCanghtry, Recording Secretary Lisa Resnick, Administrative Assistant Pelican Bay Foundation Staff Jim Hoppensteadl, President Suzanne Minaden, Executive Assistant Prescntation By Kevin Mangan, Principal and I JlD(l<:<;ape Architect, Wilson Miller Steve Sammons, Sr. Associale and Landscape An:hitecl, Wilson Miller Jeff Perry, Sr. Project Manager, Transportation Planning, Wilson Miller AGENDA (as provided by K .Mangan & S. Sammons. Wi/son Miller) 1. Roll Call 2, Welcome and Review of Agenda 3, Project Objectives 4. Improvement study areas: a. CrosswalkslPedestrian Safety b, Pathways c, Lighting d, Landscaping - Initial concepts e, Community berm f. U.S. 41 berm g, Parl<s h Communication 5. Upcoming Town Hall Meeting 6, Discussion ROLL CALL All BoanI Members were present with !be exception of Madam Chair Mary Anne Womble (excused), Mr. Gcoff Gibson (excused,) Mr, Hunler Hansen (WleXcused,) and Ms. Jill Kobe (unexcused.) Mr. Michael Levy departed al3 PM and Dr Ted Raia arrived at 3 PM. ",arrvs 7 J''';9~ii~t9 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Joint Workshop November 17, 2009 Summary Minutes ~, WELCOME & REVIEW OF AGENDA Mr. Kevin Mangan welcomed everyone and distributed materiaJs that included an agenda; "Crime Review Through Environmental Design" report that addresses safety and security concerns; 30% Base Data Phase 1 Report; and an updated meeting schedule that includes the November 25, 2009 Turkey Trot, or community site walks. Mr. Mangan and Mr. Steve Sammons will lead two distinct site walks for the community, simultaneously on Wednesday, November 25, at 8:30 AM - 10:00 AM. One tour will go from the Sandpiper Parl<ing Lot Trnm Station to the Commons, and the other tour will go from the Philharmonic to Ridgewood Park The site walks will allow for further observation and assessment and for those participants from the community, a better wIIlerstanding of the stndy and its goals. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Mangan said the Foundation would be noticing upcoming IlIllelings by postings on bulletin boards and email blasts to Foundation members with links to the meeting infonnation. Mr. Merlin Lickhalter asked if the email blasts could provide the meeting ioformation without taking the extra step to click on a link. Mr. Mangan said there is a 25-word limit on the Foundation email blasts, so the pertinent information is there and the link provides full announcement and supplemental information. Mr. Lickhalter asked when the initial announcement of the November 19, 2009 Town Hall meetings was. Mr. Mangan said they advertised the Town Hall meetings last week and the email blast is a second notice or reminder. Mr. Lickhalter asked where last week that the Foundation posted the hardcopies. Ms. Suzaune Minadeo said the Foundation provided notice on the Website under Community Update. Mr. Mangan said they did not post hard copy notices. Mr. Lickhalter said, "Pardon me, but everyone has said this is our biggest problem and first out of the blocks, we screwed it up again." Mr. Mangan responded, "Well, Merlin, I don't see that as a screw up. This is a second notice and one of the ways to communicate, not the only way to communicate. Truthfully, with the addition of this walk next week, it is simply another way that we are looking forward to ensure this community has access to us and us to them." Mr. Lickhalter apologized for using inappropriate language to describe his point and clarified it. He said Wilson Miller is depending too much on electronic communications. The Foundation could just as easily have posted the information physically at all the places that people go. 8 16 11 A 9 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foondation Strategic Planning Committee Joint Workshop November 17, 2009 Summary Minutes "",.. Mr, Mangan said that he did agree and that there will be many more notices and posted earlier in the future, Wilson Miller is not going to rely on anyone type of communication and understand it is their responsibility to connect with the community as part of the process. Mr, Lickhalter agreed and offered that posting a hard copy notice is a good and easy way to communicate, Ms, Rounie Bellone said the earlier the information is available the better for planning PUIJlOses, Mr, Mangan said to use numerous types of communication concurrently is most effective. He said the revised schedule highlights the Tmkey Trot in green. PROJECT OBJECTIVES Today's presentation and discussion expands on the consensus funned at the November 10 workshop and sets expectations. Genernl ideas are put into context to recommend enbancements, improvements, and solutious that could apply throughout the community, CROSSWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY First, Wilsou Miller is addressing issues related to safuty and seamty of pedestrian crosswaJks and pathways. Mr. Lickhalter said the community brought up the issue of saIecy at the North Trnm Station crosswalk and the Services Division asked Wilson Miller to address the issue. He believes this safety issue sbould be addressed immediately and asked how long do they expect before implementation of a solution, Mr. Mangan said regarding the North Trnm Station crosswalk, a solution could be implemented quickly, They have observed that crosswalks in the community do not confonn to the same SIandards. A new July 2009 Florida Department of Transpurtation (FD0f) standard requires high-visibility painted striping at nud-block crossings, The North Trnm Station crosswalk is not in compliance and they will icIenIilY all crosswaJks in the community to come into compliance with the new high-visibility painted striping standard. Ms. Rose Mary Everett agrees they sbould address the North Tmm Station crosswa1k safety issue quickly, but the solution consider the overall community improvement plan. Mr. Mangan said solutions they recommend to address crosswalk and pedestrian safety issues could be consistent with the master plan, The commllni1y improvement planning process will prioritize projects to implement over time. If the Board and Committee reach a consensus to resolve a high-priority issue, they can implement the solution using the master plan as a guide. He added they also will address signage and lighting that is inconsistent. Crosswalks can be painted and striped to comply with the standard. 9 e... 1'~ Pelican Bay Senices Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foonllation Strategic Planning cl~JJoint~S~oP November 17,2009 Summary Minutes , Mr. Michael Levy said there are locations where a crosswalk shoold be, but is not. He said there should be crosswalks along Pelican Bay Boulevard at the Sandpiper tram station., and at the south end of San Raphael and San Marino at beach access points. Mr. Mangan said crosswalks exist at only a few controlled intf'n;ections and they are reaching a consensus to recommend traffic calming devices at several locations where crosswalks do not exist Mr. Jeff Perry agreed. Crosswalks and pedestrian areas need to be consistent and they will identify them and make recommendations to bring them into compliance. These pedestrian safety concerns can and will be addressed and solutions implemented quickly. Mr. Moffatt asked Mr. Perry to define the yellow circles described in the legend as "Proposed Additional Pedestrian Safely. " Mr. Perry said those are areas need additional pedestrian safety enhancements, such as striping, signage, or areas where there are no crosswalks. Mr. Moffatt asked what they are planning to do to existing cmsswaIks as described in the legend as "Condition Type A" and "Condition Type B" solid stripe. Mr. Perry said they would consider enhance safuly measures at those areas because some locations need more than striping and signage. Mr. Moffatt asked if they indicated speed bumps. Mr. Mangan and Mr. Perry answered no. Mr. Perry said speed bumps and lactiJe or rnised surfuces are effective techniques used as advance warning that one is approaching a stop sign or crosswalk and to slow traffic. MI. Levy said some crossv;aIks are different color.;, i.e., on West Boulevard by the school, and in addition to having the State signage to stop for pedestrians in crosswalks, pavers delineale the crosswalk area. Mr. Perry said when the pedestrian safety areas are brought into compliance, they could consider the techniques used for advance warning and to slow traffic. Once in place, drivers lend to become accustomed to areas on the road where they need to slow down or stop, and are less likely to ignore the signals. Mr. Levy asked Mr. Perry to look into the area along Gulf Part: Drive and the Sandpiper Tram Station for pedestrian safely issues and solutions. Mr. Perry said he would look into it. 10 1611 _9 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Joint Workshop November 17,2009 Summary Minntes Mr. Lickhalter suggested that before implementing a solution to the highest priority item, that the solution be a part of the overall plan. The plan should have an assortment of solutions to refer to because the samc technique may not apply everywhere. He assumed the Services Division would implement the solution based on the guidelines provided. Mr. Mangan said he understood and today's discussion is a baseline for high visibility area recommendations. Mr. Bob Uek asked Mr. Mangan iflhey bad aocident data and where do aocidents occur more frequently. Mr. Mangan said they are drafting a letter to the Collier County Sheriff's office to obtain a report that outlines information reganling frequency of accidents, as well as data on crime IBId security issues. PATHWAYS Mr. Mangan briefly discussed pathways. The pathways in the oommunity are non-compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standanI and the goal is to bring them into compliance. Five feet wide pathways is the standard and comfortable for two people to walk side-by-side. Eight-foot wide pathways allow three people to be comfortable walking side- by-side. Ten feet wide will allow four people or couples to pass. Widening the pathways is a potential solution, but there are other issues to consider including mitigating the impact to the landscape, whether to separate activities or bave shared use for bikes and pedestrians, construction materials to consider other than concrete, ie., crushed shell or stone. Width is the number one goal. Mr. Moffatt asked if they have considered traffic lane widths and bicycle lanes on the roadway. Mr. Mangan said yes they have begun looking at whether to designate a separate lane for bikes on the roadway. Currently the roadway has two twelve feet wide 1anes. The standard for a bike lane is four feet, which would bring each car lane to ten feet wide. Mr. Levy asked if the 1anes were 10-104 would the width restrict cenain vehicles. Mr. Mangan said the ten feet standard is used in tight UIban areas and is a traffic calming technique. Generally, eleven feet is the minimum standard for a community like Pelican Bay. Narrower travel lanes near the crosswalk will raise awareness, slows traffic and shortens pedestrian distance and that may be a better solution., rather than bike 1anes in the roadway. The standard is four feet wide bike lanes in the roadway. The City of Naples is constrncting a crosswalk that uses white and yellow high visibility striping across Fleischmann Patk to the mall that is going to become the City standard. They will inquire with the City of Naples reganling the width of bike lanes. Mr. Lickha1ter requested Wilson Miller visit the Vineyards main roadway and measure the bike lanes because that roadway is similar to Pelican Bay Boulevard Mr. Mangan said he would measure the lanes and report back. 11 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning lmJ Jlt !r2op November 17, 2009 Summary Minutes ~-".... STREET LIGHTING They took inventory and identified nmnerous areas wbere landscaping is conflicting with efficiency of existing street lighting, especially areas where there are double-fixture lighting. 'The cmrent lighting is no! energy-.,fficienl. By replacing the existing lamps with LED lamps there is an energy cost-benefit savings of almost $2,600 monthly, $31,000 yearly and a retnm on investment after 13 years. LED lamps produce much brighter lighting and are more energy efficient and better for the environment than existing facilities. Mr. Lickhalter asked what the soun:e of this information for currenllighting maintenance costs is. Mr. Mangan said it is based on typical standanls. It has not been cross-referenced. Mr. Lickhalter asked if the cost includes replacement. Mr. Mangan said replacement is on an as-needed basis. Mr. Lickhalter asked what the qualitative and quantitative benefits of lighting are wbere it is deficient Mr. Mangan said they are introducing to the community how it can reduce energy costs. The LED lighting uses less energy, therefore, they can improve deficient lighting areas by redistributing the lighting using the same amount of power corrently used. They are looking into ways they can improve the efficiency of the cunent system, rather than replacing it Ms. Rose Mary Everett asked what would be better: introduce a new system, or retrofit the current one. Mr. Mangan said ways to improve the current system serves as a baseline for potential solutions that will evolve over the course of the study. It would cost more to replace it For example, if they were to recommend replacing the poles, there is the cost of removal, rewiring, installation, and the cost of the new pole itself. Ms. Everett asked was it possible to improve the design using a ph3sed approach or would it have to be community-wide implementation. Mr. Mangan said phasing is possible. For example, the}' ClIn implement the project along Pelican Bay Boulevard in one pbase. The Connty is evaluating its current lighting system and considering LED as ways to improve delivery, become energy efficient, reduce the carbon footprint., and SUSlainability. The cost benefit can be used for other projects Mr. Moffatt asked if they looked into solar energy. Mr. Mangan said solar energy is a great possibility, but applies better to unique situations. Solar will not wod<: well in shaded areas, but some combination of solar energy recommendatioos will be part of this study. Implementation and how phased is another question. LANDSCAPING - INITIAL CONCEPTS 12 16111A9 Pelican Bay Serviees Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Founllation Strategic Planning Committee Joint Workshop November 17, 2009 Summary Minutes .. - f Mr. Steve Sammons presented some initiallaodscaping conceplS. In the common areas along roadways, they observed overgrown and dated vegetation and some initial ideas are to replace it and apply some consistency, as well as move toward vegetation that requires less maintenance, i.e., remove sod along medians and replace with shrub and groundcovers. Mr. Cravens asked Mr. Sammons to clarifY tbe teon "dated." Mr. Sammons said "dated" material is vegetation requiring a great deal of maintenance and community-wide. they do not appear as they would in their natural state. Suggestions made were to use tenus "tired" or "worn out." Mr. Mangan said public perception is key and they need to convey what they mean using proper terms. Mr. Sammons said they are \ooI<ing t<> apply landscaping consistency community-wide, as well as move toward micro- irrigation. On Pelican Bay Boulevard from the "nosing" back to about 125 fuet, there are a lot of Sabat palms and sod that requires a lot of maintenance. Ms. Noreen Munay asked fur clarification of the teon "nusing." Mr. Mangan said "nusing" is the edge or point where the cmb turns back on itself, for example, the nose is the point where there is a turn lane into or out of a community. Sabat Palms individually planted with sod from the nosing to the length of the median require a lot of maintenance, i.e., fertilizer, irrigation and trimming. Best management practices suggest replacing sod with shrub, and broadcast irrigation with micro irrigation and provide cost benefit to the 2 & 1/2 acres along Pelican Bay Boulevard in teons of requiring less maintenance and by reducing consumption of water, fertilizer and pesticides. Dr. Ted Raia asked how the barren areas within the community could be shaded effectively. Mr. Mangan said they have to look at what is underground, i.e., utiJities in order to recommend what is possible. Mr. Sammons referred to a stretch of pathways without shade. If nothing underground interferes, they can plant trees along one side to provide shade. Mr. Mangan, crediting Mr. Lukasz, said some areas along the right of way are private property. When they determine solutions, they need to be mindful of ownership, but some of the property lines, even though leg;llly are private, are "in between," but they are 1aking a holistic approach, across the board. Through the planning process, they will have a better understanding of the property, and if there are obstacles that exist underground to deliver some solutions. Ms. Ronnie Bellone asked if they would be looking at the pathways around Oakmont Lake. Mr. Mangan said the Oakmont Lake is discussed in today's Parks presentation. Mr. Sammons added the Oakmont Park area and lake is displayed in the "Crime Prevention through Environmental Design" report, but they have not directly addressed the pathways yet. 13 16 I 1 A 9 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foonolation Strategic Planning Committee Joint Workshop November 17,2009 Summary Minutes _. . Mr. Mangan said today' s pathways discussion is the baseline. Mr. Keith Dallas asked what problems with trees veISUS pathways they have observed. Mr. Mangan said as they move along the pathways they are looking up and down. Trees block lighting and paths along pathways, so widening the pathways, or relocating trees are possible solutions, however if the tree is overly aggressive, relocating serves no purpose. Mr. Lickhalter said damage to irrigation systems are caused by motor vebie1es driving on the grass. He said they are usually Collier County vebie1es. but today he saw commercial vebie1es parked along the grass. They should address bow to keep vebicles from driving on the grass Mr. Mangan said sheriff deputy vebie1es sits in the median and bums the grass on event nights at the Philharmonic, burning up the grass. They are looking into possible solutions to keep vehicles off the grass. Mr. Sammons said they are putting together base plans with accurate infonnation, including irrigation plans, efficient zones that can trnnsition to micro drip irrigation without atrecting larger parts of the system. They are looking at existing transition areas for conflicts, i.e., is the pathway going to be affected by wbere trees are planted., or is there already a conflict requiring tree removal or relocatioa COMMUNITY BERM Mr. Mangan said they have observed the comnnmity berm. 1bere is a lot of exotic invasive and nuisance vegetation and they recommend removal and planting of replacemeot species. They are looking at areas where there is shade already to possibly widen the hew, as well as areas where structures currently exist to construct rest stations, look ont areas, bird atbactor platfows, and additional tram stations to increase shade and provide drinking water. Ms. Murray asked what the difference between "nuisance" vegetation and "exotic invasive" vege1ation is. She understood them both to be vegetation not natmaI to the area and relIlO\'Cd. Mr. Cravens clarified that "exotic" means any plant or animal introduced after Europeans came here, approximately 1500. One quarter of uncultivated vegetation growing in Florida is exotic. Some exotics are not invasive. Exotic vegetation that has escaped captivity and is successful is considered "exotic invasive." There are 167 plants considered exotic invasive in Florida. "Nuisance" is more vague a term. Mr. Mangan added vegetation considered exotic or a nuisance is less desirable, generally. Mr. Cravens said, "Duckweed is the green, slimy stuff that COveIS everything," that you see when you walk the hew." Nitrate and phosphate from fertilizer use causes duckweed growth and copper sulfate is used to control it currently. 14 1611 ~ 9 - Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Joint Workshop November 17,2009 Summary Minutes Mr. Mangan said duckweed is endemic and this report identifies it as being problematic. This report provides the ecological report of possibilities for the community berm. Mr. LickhaIter complimented Wilson Miller for capturing the benn gmpbically on one sheet of paper. U.S. 41 BERM Mr. Sammons described the gmphic representation of the U.S. 41 berm They compared noise levels in cer1ain areas and discovered there is a correlation between the height of the berm and the level of noise. Height and dense landscape yields lower audible noise levels. Mr. Ralph Ohlers asked what the reference point for height of the berm is. There are some points below the level of the highway. Mr. Sammons said the U.S. 41 benn gmphic represents visual observations made from the U.S. 41 side of the berm. It appears there are differences in audible noise levels throughout the community, but they can compare surveyed elevation points to confirm They are looking into ways to mitigate audible noise and some ideas are to use better insulate material to build or extend walls, and introduce fountains to create white noise. Security concerns can be mitigated nsing access control features such as installing or extending walls and landscaping that will help keep people away. Ms. Munay suggested they discuss the November 19 Town Hall meeting process. Mr. LickhaIter asked if they have quantifiable information regarding audible noise problems along U. S. 41 and if the property boundary information of public and private land is accurate Mr. Mangan said they do have accurate property line information, but the current gmpbic does not display it. They plan to test sound levels using a meter, so they will have empirical data. Mr. LickhaIter said they s1wn1d test sound levels during season. Mr. Mangan said yes and after season. Mr. Moffatt asked if they would include instances along the berm. Mr. Mangan said yes. They are looking for patterns of occurrences and locations. PARKS Mr. Sammons said they are observing parks and taking inventory of existing areas. There is good connectivity, somewhat adequate parking, well kept, and offer passive activities. They are looking into enhancemeots that could offer genetal multi-use gathering areas to offer classes, dog pmks, parl<ing, and other activities. The improvements would also address crime prevention through environmental design. 15 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Founilation Strategic Planning col~e lin1w!s~ November 17, 2009 Summary Minutes ,.... Dr. Raia said the Oakmont Lake pathway is very narrow. They designed and buill the pathway along one side of the roadway to save space for development. 1bere are entIyways from cul-de-sacs along the other side of the street, so pedestrians must cross the roadway to get to the pathways. Other areas of the pathways are not accessible to everyone. Bicycles used to be allowed on the pathway, but they are now restricted. He made SUggestillllS to consider widening the pathways and designate pedestrian and bicyclist areas, as well as address safety and accessibility concerns. There was some discussion of ownership of the property aronnd the Oakmont Lake and Mr. Lnkasz said the Foundation owned the eastern half of the property and the west side is County property and a water management easement. Mr. Mangan said Mr. Lukasz is correct, but be would checl< the records. UPCOMING TOWN HALL MEETING Mr. Mangan said on Thursday, November 19, 2009 they would hold two Community Educational Town Hall style meetings in two identical sessions at 2 PM - 4 PM and 7 PM - 9 PM. lbey will present a map of the general geogmphical areas. Ms. Murray asked if they would display a large map on an easel. Mr. Mangan said yes and they would probably have two or three maps, so people lDIIieIsIand the area and objectives of the community improvement planning study. TIley will dedicate the last hour for community participation and an opportunity to ask questions. The goal is to explain why they are here and what they are doing. They will announce upcoming meetings. Future town hall meetings will have table slalions with individual topics where the community can go to provide input. This is a systematic process and this meeting is a place to begin. Ms. Murray said someone should introduce Wilson Miller from the Board or Committee, so that the consultants are not attacked, per se, by a smaIl number of people in the community that object to this project loudly. Mr. Lickha1ter said he shared some nasty pointed emai1s with Mr. Hoppensteadt. 1be emails are from people who question the rationale of this stndy and believe it to be a waste of money. They should be prepared for "grenades." Ms. Noreen said her point is they should not be launching grenades at Wilson Miller, but at the Board and Committee and the members should be prepared to explain. Ms. Minadeo said there would be an area at the front for Board and Committee members to sit if they choose. Ms. Murray said they should have discnssed room setup prior because although she wants to sit up front, not everyone does. Ms. Bellone said she wants to sit amongst the community to judge reaction. She added they shou1d be prepared at the introduction to give the rationale to hire experts to conduct this stndy. Mr. Moffatt suggested Ms. Womble give the introduction because she is a Chair of the Board and Committee member. 16 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelit:an Bay Foundation Strategic PlanniDA~m!eeti:!o2hOP November 17.2009 Summary Minutes Mr. Uek said he would give the inlrodudion if Ms. Womble declined. The bottom line is to make it clear they will spend no money until voted on by the Board and Committee. There was a consensus that people would protest vociferously and that an introduction is a good idea. In addition, Board and Committee members should sit up froot to take responSibility for sponsoring the study, although not everyone will attend both sessions, so ouly a minimal amount of chairs are necessary. Ms. Minadeo and Ms. Resnick would query the members' plans for attendance. There is a reception following the first session. Ms. Murray said the term consultant is not very descriptive and asked how to describe Wilson Miller. Mr. Lickhalter said to avoid the term landscaping anything. Mr. Mangan described Wilson Miller as a team of community consultants, as much a part of this community as the residents. The meeting adjourned at 4:21 PM. Minutes by Lisa Resnidc 11/10/2009 4:17=42 PM 17 1 b I 1 '~ 9 Fiala ()f( Halas SESSION ONE OF THE PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION EDUCATIONAL MEETING ~Iltm THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2009 Coyle SUMMARY MINUTES Coletta .. / v" --1) LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Pelican Bay Fonndation conducted a public Educational Meeting to tbe Commuuity on Tbursday, November 19, 2009 at 2:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples. Participants included the following members of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board and the Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee: Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board Members Mary Anne Womble, Cbairwoman Michael Levy Keith Dallas, Vice Chairman Geoffrey Gibson Tom Cmvens John laizzo RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2010 rNQkro_i8DII1 lloard of counlY CO Pelican Bay Fonndation Strategic Planning Committee Members Bob Uek, Chairman Noreen Murray Ronnie Bellone, Co-Vice Chairwoman Ralph Ohlers Merlin Lickhalter, Co-Vice Chairman Mary Anne Womble Rose Mary Everett Carson Beadle (absent) Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Neil Dorrill, Administrator (absent) Kyle Lukasz, Field Opemtions Manager (absent) Mary McCaughtry, Recording Secretary Lisa Resnick, Administrative Assistant Pelican Bay Foundation Staff Jim Hoppensteadt, President Gwen Rasiwala, Communications Manager Suzanne Minadeo, Executive Assistant Presentation By Kevin Mangan, Principal, Wilson Miller Steve Sammons, Sr. Associate, Wilson Miller Jeff Perry, Transportation Planner, Wilson Miller Approximately fifty (50) people attended and there were ten (10) public speakers. COMMENCEMENT Madam Chair Mary Anne Womble commenced the meeting at tWo o'clock, welcomed and familiarized the audience with what was the first town hall-style Educational Meeting to the Community to discuss the Pelican Bay Community Improvement Planning study. Members of the Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee, Pelican Bay Services Division Board, and the Wilson Miller Community Improvements Planning team are here today. The Committee and the Board, "with the County's blessing," are working together, sharing responsibility and funds to put an end to duplication of services, wasteful spending, and project redo. The goal is to develop a strategic master plan for Pelican Bay. A legal inter- local agreement for management services was executed between the Foundation and the Services Division to sbare cost and in the decision-making process. Community communication is an important part of this process. The purpose of this meeting and future ones are to provide project information, updates and an opportunity for the community to cootribute input. She introduced the Wilson Miller Community Improvements Planning Team: Mr. Kevin Mangan, Principal and Project MiSC. Carres: [Jats', ._.._,,_ ,_..._.__,_,_._..-.__._~" 18 l\em# " '" "':: t~) - '* . .. Session One of tbe Pelican Bay Foundation Educational Meeting to tbe Community Summary Minutes November 19, 2009 16 I 1 A9 Manager, Mr. Steve Sammons, Sr. Associate, and Mr. Jeff Perry, Transportation Planner. Wilson Miller has worked in the Pelican Bay community for many years and the team consists of landscape architects with many years of experience and expertise. She announced the upcoming November 25, 2009 Turkey Trot, or community site walk. One tour is roundtrip from the Philbannonic along Pelican Bay Boulevard to Ridgewood Park; the other is roundtrip from the Sandpiper tram station parking lot to the Commons, and loops the berm. The planners will hold the tours simultaneously and those interested should meet on site at 8:30 in the morning. PRESENTATION Mr. Kevin Mangan explained an essential component of the Community Improvements Planning study and town hall meetings are to communicate and involve the community. Future meetings will be more interactive. The study's objective is to create an integral community wide improvement plan with phased implementation. The six-month, three phase study uses a holistic approach to gather information and give direction for future design of a scope of services. The team intends to recommend improvements that conform to this historical community. There are more efficient and less costly ways to maintain quality of life, both residentially and commercially. They can introduce sustainable and best management practices to achieve long-term cost benefit. The comment card that lists the thirteen specific scope of services and he encouraged the audience to complete it. The community responses to the 2007 master planning survey found there are specific geographic areas with a number of needs. The areas include the U.S. 41 and community berms. The team will address elements of those areas and others including master streetscape, irrigation systems, public and foundation properties street lighting, sound abatement, safety concerns, security, pathways, traffi9 calming, community parks, entryways signage, public arts, new technologies, and tram stations. A level of consistency needs to be established and filcilities brought into compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. The final plan will be the result of community consensus. He encouraged resident participation, feedback, and November 25 site walks attendance. He opened the floor to audience comments at 2:46 p.m. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Pelican Bay resident, Mr. Bill McCormick thanked both the Committee and Board for undertaking this effort. The community needs this project. Secondly, it is important to think through how to get the community involved in the process because four or five town hall meetings is not going to effectively communicate the project to thousands of homeowners. He suggested charging the President's Councilor presidents of individual condominium associations with getting collective views from their respective groups. It is also important to have a process to determine how to get input for establishing 19 Session One oetbe Pelican Bay Foundation Educational Meeting to tbe Community Summary Minutes November 19, 2009 16'I~A9 prioritics. Once people understand wbat the projects are and what they are going to cost, then they can determine whether they think it is worth it or not. it is important to allow the community to provide input early in the process and the community should be prioritizing the projects by ranking what they think is important and urgent, to not so essential. Otherwise, the people who are most involved in the process will end up making the decisions. They should proceed with caution. Until people see the price tag of a particular project, they really cannot determine what is most important. People have different views on where and how much should be spent, for example, on median landscaping. Personally, he feels the pathways are most important and be enhanced and improved, especially upgrade material from asphalt to something more elegant. Other people might not agree with him. Madam Chair Womble said she liked Mr. McCormick's ideas. She reminded the audience the Strategic Planning Committee sent a survey to the community and the strategic plan developed from results. Based on community response, the scope of services was prioritized by importance. The beach, berms, trams, restaurants, and safety issues are most important. There was a tremendous response to the survey, so it is a good guideline and any deviation be vetted to the community. Ms. Noreen Murray said there were 2,259 responses to the survey out of 6,500, approximately 30%. Mr. Mangan said the Board and Committee has ingrained in the team, the importance of community communication exchange. He thanked Mr. McCormick for the idea to charge the President's Council responsible for providing consensus from their respective associations; the team will implement. Mr. Alan Grossman, resident of Bridge Way Villas at Pelican Bay asked, "Why." He said he was late for this meeting because he was admiring the sights along Pelican Bay Boulevard c;n route. He is against making big cbanges for the sake of making cbanges because they are difficult and expensive. There is nothing wrong with this community; everynne thinks it is beautiful like it is. He is not concerned with spending extra on irrigation. Mr. Mangan referred to the 30% response rate to the survey and will within the community to look at some elements. He agreed that major changes are not a good idea. They would like to recommend best management practices that can provide cost benefit and sustainable practices, and what this community is founded. Recommendations for cbange will be small, imperceptible, but ultimately for the betterment of the community. He gave examples. Throughout the community, crosswalk signage is inconsistent, unintuitive, or do not exist where they are needed. Pedestrians exhibit the desire to cross the roadway at crosswalks and the community should meet standards. The team can plan a forum to address these and other concerns. Many Sabal palms are planted in roadway medians and each palm requires much maintenance and irrigation. 20 Session One of the Pelican Bay Foundation Educational Meeting to the Community Summary Minutes November 19, 2009 1611 'A9 ..... Reducing water demand can save money. Community sustainability and best management practice is becoming standard and this study provides an opportunity to bring to fruition. Mr. Keith Dallas agreed with Mr. Mangan and sees small changes, or "tweaks" made. The study gives the community a more thoughtful way to approach and address issues, and spend wisely. The process will be thorough, vetted to the community for feedback, and over time priorities and a game plan will develop to spend money more wisely and maintenance easier. Mr. Paul Mead applauded the process of continual improvement. As a former seasonal visitor, he has noticed subtle changes over the past eleven years. Pelican Bay used to be the "Garden of Eden," but now is too green. The community needs color and "twenty-nine types of ornamental grass." Pelican Bay should base its landscaping model on the Naples Botanical Garden. He suggested they not worry about being politically correct and if work done along the U.S. 41 berm, it should be a variety of colorful species. Mr. David Doern said Pelican Bay looks the same as it did thirty years ago. As a Planned Unit Development (PUD) from the 1970's, it has been successful, so something done right for some time. He suggested they address safety, security, lighting, and landscaping at the two large commercial area entrances, as well as ways to reduce traffic for ingress and egress from commercial areas into residential areas. Myra Janco Daniels Boulevard entrance needs to be marked with Pelican Bay signage. As development increases, safety, security, and traffic concerns will also increase. Mr. Mangan said Pelican Bay is a gem because it is open, not gated. Part of the project is to review and make recommendations regarding perimeter safety and security. Decisions they )Dake need to be applicable and standard communitywide. Mr. George Talisse, resident ofOakmont at Pelican Bay said there are too many committees and people commit to them in order to feel fulfilled. He does not believe the community is happy about, or wants to spend $250,000 on consultants. "Stop spending all this money . We are in a recession. People are without jobs. The unemployment rate is unbelievable. People do not have the money to throw around like they are throwing around." The Services Division wastes money. Chairwoman Womble said she is happy Mr. Talisse recognizes the wasteful spending and duplication ofservices in the past. They have recognized it too. The Services Division has saved money over past few years, putting other projects on hold until this process began. Hiring professionals for advice is a normal part of the planning process. The difference this time is the Services Division and Foundation are working together and this relationship is defined legally by an inter-local agreement developed in accordance to the master plan by Mr. Hoppensteadt, Mr. Dorrill and a lawyer. This collaboration 21 Session One of the Pelican Bay Foundation Educational Meeting to the Community Summary Miuutes Novemher 19, 2009 16 11 A 9 eliminates project duplicity and wasteful spending. She added that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners determines the assessment and the Services Division cannot refund or reduce it. Mr. Phil Blanchard, resident of Breakwater at Pelican Bay asked if LED lighting technology has advanced enough to justity the expense of upgrading. Mr. Mangan said they are considering LED lighting. On Pelican Bay Boulevard, there are 250-watt metal halide (halogen) lamps and they replace with LED lamps in kind. Cell phones and televisions use LED technology and the technology is moving into environmental areas such as street lighting. LED has the ability to save 20% - 45% energy usage and five times greater life therefore providing a cost benefit opportunity, reducing power consumption and energy costs. Although a higher initial cost, LED lighting is more efficient than lamp lighting and savings redistributed to other projects. For example, a new air conditioner is more efficient than a ten-year-old one and yields 30% - 40"10 energy savings. Mr. Dallas said one issue is the perception that new costs more, however, the older fucilities get, the more costly is the maintenance, so the time will come when it will make sense. Mr. Calvin Grayson said to forget about the dollar amount and think smarter and safer ways now than thirty years ago. Forget about the landscaping part. Mr. Mangan said although his background is as a landscape architect, this is an improvement plan for the community and landscape or streetscape is inside the realm. Mr. Ronald DiOrio, resident of Valencia at Pelican Bay said consultants always recommend many changes, most of which are not needed. The Board and Committee needs to communicate ellectively with the community every recommended improvement and the cost. Ms. Murray said she was a consultant by profession and understands Mr. DiOrio's concerns however, there are things that are not obvious to everyone. Improvements to pathways, crosswalks, and traffic calming require professional advice. She disagrees with the comment people join committees for fulfilhnent. Her motivation is the desire to keep this community one they want to live in. Projects are to be paid based on property ownership or in some cases by use. No money can be spent until that expenditure is independently approved by either the Board (owners of public land,) the Foundation's Committee (owners of private land,) or both entities, if a recommendation is on shared land or for shared use. The planning study's outcome does not commit funding to anything. It will provide a professional view of prioritized recommendations of community needs. 22 Session One oftbe Pelican Bay Foundation Educational Meeting to tbe Community Summary Minutes November 19, 2009 1611 A9 Mr. McCormick said Pelican Bay is thirty years old and needs improvements. Tbe only way to resolve this is to make sure the community participates in establishing priorities and decision-making process. They should not implement projects unless they receive majority community input and consensus, and will maintain property values. A few facilities require a lot more than tweaking, but only if community sentiment believes it is worthwhile and cost effective investment. Majority does rule. Mr. Bob Uek said from the strategic master plan survey, safety and security were determined main priorities. It does not necessarily matter what the reasons are whether lamps or LED are used for street lighting, but the fact that lighting is inadequate if there are overgrown trees blocking it. He frequently hears complaints about drivers not stopping for pedestrians at crosswalks. Tbe berm is multiuse and there are many safety and security concerns. People fall on too narrow and wobbly pathways. Safety and security is not free; it may be costly, however prevention is necessary, as well as the concept of best management practices. This is not a democracy and some issues go beyond what the community wants. If one were to compare Pelican Bay with other similar benchmark communities, they will realize how responsible and well run this community is. Pelican Bay's fees are lower and the community operates on a balanced budget, no outstanding debt, fully funded replacement reserve, and capital to spend in case of emergency. Mr. Dieter Haussmann, resident of Bay Villas at Pelican Bay is concerned about safety, security, and traffic management. There are more people, pedestrians, vehicles, and older drivers. Motorists cut through Pelican Bay because they do not want to drive on U.S. 41. The community needs to evolve and adapt with expectations or it will decline. He is a retired Booz-Allen partner and confident in his assessment. If one does not plan, they will fall behind. Organizations must spend money to make advances. He applauded the Board and Committee for their effort. Forwarding thinking by WCl was thirty years ago and now is the time to plan. Mr. Jeff Perry said they have made traffic observations. He has heard from residents about many difficulties with pathways, crosswalks, traffic management, but he has not observed them. The community and the planning team need to determine what the problems are, differentiating real problems from perceived problems. They can address real problems, i.e., mature landscaping is blocking sight visibility creating a safety bazard. Mr. Lickhalter asked for assurance that a problem would be identified correctly. How will a member oftbe President's Council inform their associations with true knowledge, not misinformation and rumors. In order to give a valid opinion, people must understand the issues. 23 Session One of the Pelican Bay Foundation Edncational Meeting to the Commnnity Summary Minntes November 19, 2009 1611 A.9 . Mr. McCormick said they could convey information by establishing priorities. In his association, unit owners made many suggestions for projects. They then sent a memorandum to every unit owner with the list of suggested projects and asked them to rank them based on priority or importance. They had a 95 percent return rate. He suggested sending a memo to unit owners that describes each scope of service or project and the reasons for considering it. Attach a price tag to each project and ask which ones they think are a high priority and rank them from high to low. They could task each association president to get consensus from their respective associations. He offered bis assistance. Mr. Bill Hennig, resident of the Grosvenor at Pelican Bay said he is concerned that the final plan and the cost will not be ready for community approval until after season is owner and most owners are gone. Mr. McConmck disagreed and said most of that information with costs, although not necessarily definitive would be available prior to end of season in Phase II, or beginning of March. Mr. Mangan said that is correct. At the end of Phase II, they will have several choices with costs associated with them. The team's responsibility to the President's Council would be to reacb out to the community, present the information, and obtain feedback relatively quickly. Ms. Bellone pointed out that at the last President's Council meeting, 31 out of90 association presidents attended. Mr. Hennig said the schedule does not promise anything defmitive. Mr. Mangan said the schedule is fitting and does not see a problem with some minor fluctuations. Mr. Grossman said Pelican Bay may be thirty years old, but many upgrades done recently, including repaving of Pelican Bay Boulevard, and new and renovated fucilities. By trade, he is a retired architect and building developer. He did compete with Westinghouse Communities or WCI, but ''where is WC! today." They need to be mindful of, "nice, but not necessary." Mr. Mangan said WC! was a fonner client. Mr. Grossman's point was well-taken, but WCI used forward thinking when they built Pelican Bay and people are moving back to well established communities. Working in communities like Pelican Bay, developed with nature is his "biggest joy." He asked if there were questions, there were none, so he encouraged the audience to complete comment cards and said thank you. MInutes by LIsa ResnIck 12/18/2009.3=42:39 PM 24 1611l'~?F{~. I H~lllll' ' SESSION TWO OF THE PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION EDUCATIONAL MEETING TO~I'i~ht1~' ' THURSDAY, NOVEMBERI9,2oo9 eB1llet....Vl~ ~~ c; P SUMMARY MINUTES Ct> \l" - -- LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Pelican Bay Foundation conducted a public Educational Meeting to the Community on Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 7:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples. Participants included the following members ofthe Pelican Bay Services Division Board and the Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee: Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board Members Mary Anne Womble, Chairwoman Gerald Moffatt HECEIVED FEB 1 9 20\0 Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Members Bob Uek, Chairman Rose Mary Everett Ronnie Bellooe, Co-Vice Chairwoman Mary Anne Womble Merlin Lickhalter, Co- Vice Chairman Boord 01 county co.....~.-. Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Lisa Resnick, Administrative Assistant Pelican Bay Foundation Staff Jim Hoppensteadt, President Presentation By Kevin Mangan, Principal, Wilson Miller Steve Sammons, Sr. Associate, Wilson Miller Approximately twenty (20) people attended and there were seven (7) public speakers. COMMENCEMENT Madam Chair Mary Anne Womble commenced the meeting at seven o'clock and welcomed the audience. She encouraged they pick up the Pelican Bay Community Improvement Planning study report that describes the project, and complete a comment card. She set the stage for the evening session and first town hall-style Educational Meeting to the Community to discuss the Community Improvements Planning study. She introduced herself and members of the Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee, Pelican Bay Services Division Board. She introduced the Wilson Miller Community Improvements Planning Team: Mr. Kevin Mangan, Principal and Project Manager, and Mr. Steve Sammons, Sr. Associate. She added Wilson Miller has worked in the Pelican Bay community for many years and Mr. Mangan and Mr. Sammons are landscape architects with many years of experience and expertise. She announced the upcoming November 25,2009 Turkey Trot, or community site walks. One tour is roundtrip from the Philharmonic along Pelican Bay Boulevard to Ridgewood Park; the other is roundtrip from the Sandpiper tram station parking lot to the Commons, and loops the berm. The planners will hold the tours simultaneously and those interested should meet on site at 8:30 in the morning. She turned the floor over to Mr. Mangan. PRESENTATION Mr. Kevin Mangan gave a brief presentation. He explained an essential component of the Community Improvements Planning study and town hall meetings are to communicate and involve the community. Future mOOtirigs'wlll be more 25 '.-.----- Item # '"V0S tc 16 I 1 ~A 9 Session Two of tbe Pelican Bay Foundation Educational Meeting to tbe Community Summary Minutes November 19, 2009 interactive with "stations" to go based on interest. The team will display their progress on several elements and the community can observe and provide input, i.e., tbere will be one station for transportation, another fur pathways and so on. The study's objective is to create an integral community wide improvement plan with phased implementation. The six- month, three-phase study uses a holistic approach to gather information and give direction for future design of a scope of services. The team intends to recommend improvements that conform to this historical community. There are more efficient and less costly ways to maintain quality oflife, both residentially and commercially. They can introduce sustainable and best management practices to achieve long-term cost benefit. The comment card lists the thirteen specific scopes of service and he encooraged the audience to complete the comment card. Community responses to the recent Strategic Master Planning survey found there are specific geographic areas with a number of needs. The areas include the U.S. 41 and community berms. The team will address elements of those areas and others including master streetscape, irrigation systems, public and foundation properties street lighting, sound abatement, safuty concerns, security, pathways, traffic calming, community parks, entryways signage, public arts, new technologies, and tram stations. A level of consistency needs to be established and facilities brought into compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. The final plan will be the result of community consensus. Madam Chair Womble pointed out project implementation will be over a series of two, five, ten or twenty years. Mr. Mangan encouraged resident participation, feedback, and to attend the November 25 site walks and other workshops and meetings. He opened the floor to audience comments. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mr. John Mueller, resident of Bentwood Drive in Pelican Bay attended the meeting with his wife, Elizabeth. He exclaimed there is no time to wait, now is the time to implement improvements. The beach is important, but he is most concerned about noise pollution on Bentwood Drive. He compared noise on Bentwood to areas near U.S. 41. He did not see Bentwood Drive on the map and asked if it was a part of the project.. Mr. Mangan said the project is specific to the highlighted areas on the map. Mr. Mueller suggested scheduling more site walks after the holidays. He admitted he completed the survey negatively and did not believe it adequately reflected community input He thanked Mr. Mangan and fur including the community in this effort from the very beginning and asking for their opinion. Mr. Mangan said they would be scheduling additional site walks because it is a great way to learn about the community. 26 16 rIA 9 Session Two of the Pelican Bay Foundation Educational Meeting to the Community Summary Minutes November 19, 2009 Ms. Jan Martino, resident of Serendipity Drive in Pelican Bay resident said security is a major concern to address. Mr. Ronald Fishbein said he hopes the team consid...s the community's natural environment and asked how they plan to preserve integrity ofthe mangroves. Mr. Mangan said the scope does not address the mangroves specifically. Best management practices will consider related elements that can indirectly affect mangrove health, such as recommendations for removal of harmful and high maintenance plant species to reduce water use, fertilizer, and pesticides. A strong effort will be made to prevent or reduce damage and introduce better and sustainable choices. Those choices will guide them toward defining the community improvement plan. Mr. Fishbein asked Mr. Mangan ifhe is aWare of problems with Clam Bay. Mr. Mangan said he is aware of problems with Clam Bay and this is only the beginning. Better choices will go a long way. Following this study, more will need to be studied. A resident of Claridge at Pelican Bay said, "If it ain't !roke don't fix it," and hopes they are addressing elements the community determined are essential to the future of Pelican Bay. Regarding noise, in Long Island where he is from, they try to prevent and control noise with concrete barriers. How does the team plan to address noise and hopes they are not planning to address noise with concrete barriers. Mr. Patrick Donovan resident of Coronado at Pelican Bay asked if Phase III, item C6, the final design report with drawings scheduled for April 14, 2010 entails specific proposals and costs. Mr. Mangan said yes. Mr. Donovan asked how the approval process works. Mr. Mangan said the Services Division is the same as the County and the Board will approve and pay for projects in areas of public land, i.e., roadways. The Strategic Planning Committee will approve and pay for projects on private or Foundation lands. Common interests, i.e., street lighting can be considered a common interest and project decisions and costs would be shared. Some projects will be recommended as high priority and should implement quickly, others will phase over time because they are a low priority. Implementation is not a part of this project. This project provides a plan fur implementation. Mr. Merlin Lickhalter said more definitive information would be available in March and be shared with the community before any decisions are made or money is spent. The entity responsible for the property is responsible for approval. 27 16 , 1 A'9 Session Two of tbe Pelican Bay Foundation Edncational Meeting to tbe Community Summary Minutes November 19,2009 Mr. Mangan said correct. The team observes and reviews ideas continuously and the better choice will evolve based how quickly they can implement, by priority and cost until they reach consensus. Mr. Dooovan asked if a project from several years ago to install bicycle lanes on Pelican Bay Boulevard and repaving ofthe Boulevard was complete. Mr. Lickhalter said they did not install bicycle lanes because the community was against it adamantly. Chairwoman Womble said th...e were parts repaved and the project is complete. Mr. Dooovan asked if widening the boardwalk to separate the tram from pedestrian traffic is under consideration. Mr. Mangan said the boardwalk is part of the scope. There is an opportunity to widen, but as far as physical separation goes there are many environmental regulations as well as it is a multiuse facility, so it would be a challenge in terms of being finite. There is opportunity to build additional rest stations with shade and seating, but the outcome is yet to be determined. Mr. David Ritg..., resident of Pine Creek Lane in Pelican Bay said he does not understand the project and asked Mr. Mangan for clarification of the goals for lighting, berm and pathways. Mr. Mangan said one important issue is inconsistency. Crosswalks are missing in areas they should exist, some are marked with signage, and some are not. Crosswalks need to be consistent cornmunitywide. The pathways are too narrow; roots are pushing up the concrete. Landscaping along the roodway medians are blocking visibility and require much maintenance. Tree overgrowth blocks street lighting. They are meeting with the County's transportation department to discuss crosswalks to find out cost and priority. They can address quickly, ~lements that need immediate attention. Th...e are ways to do things better and their goal is to create a consistent road map fur a master plan with a known cost. Mr. Ritg... said he does not like public art and that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Mr. Mangan said public art is part ofthe scope, but this study would only identifY a program of how it would come to be. They will not be installing art. Mr. Ritger asked ifrecreational fucilities are a part of the project. He hears there are not enough tennis courts and talk of a dog park. Mr. Mangan said they would be looking at community parks, but not necessarily for tennis courts or dog parks. Mr. Mueller suggested fountains be built for noise abatement They should not rule out ideas and complete projects quickly. 28 Session Two of the Pelican Bay Foundation Educational Meeting to the Community Summary Minutes November 19,2009 16111Aq Mr. Charles Bodo, resident of Cannes of Pelican Bay asked what the outcome of this study would be. What is the prioritization process. Who is responsible for completion of a project. He asked for clarity of how doing something better would benefit. What are the cost savings for removing sod. The community needs specific information. They need to know what, why, and the cost. Mr. Mangan said they know the Foundation owns certain lands, and the County owns other lands. The challenge is the common interest areas. The Services Division does not want to participate in a community art program. The Foundation owns the berm land. The bottom line is this study will produce a road map on how to proceed by decisions ultimately made by consensus ofthe community and approval by the entity that owns the property. Madam Chair Womble said an inter-local agreement executed to integrate efforts of the Services Division and Foundation. This is not much different from what the Services Division has been doing for years except better because it is not putting on Band-aids, working with the community, eradicating duplicity, sharing costs, and implementing projects that will comply with a master plan and result in a better community. Mr. Donovan asked if they are addressing or had any control over the decline of the Albertson's shopping center at Vanderbilt Road. Mr. Moffatt said the Albertson's would become a large and experimental "green" Publix. Mr. Mueller asked who has responsibility of the shopping center. Mr. Lickhalter said County law requires construction work obtain building permits and the County issues the permits. He asked Mr. Jim Hoppensteadt if the Foundation has any control over work done to the exterior. Mr. Hoppensteadt said the land defined by Pelican Bay is Foundation land and the Foundation requires approval to exterior design modifications. The shopping center is failing economically and the Publix will compete with Whole Foods and must succeed or other businesses will not go in. All parties are aware of the decline and they may do some parking lot improvements. Mr. Mangan said that commercial interests are also a part of the scope. They are looking at commercial interests in terms of their relationship to the community because the geographic areas are not within the scope. Mr. Donovan asked if the developer is responsible for the decline ofthe shopping center. Mr. Hoppensteadt said the developer must maintain minimwn slllndards and the Foundation would not involve itself unless they fail to maintain the standard. They are having a challenging but ongoing dialogue with the developer to resolve. 29 1611lA9 Session Two of tbe Pelican Bay Foundation Educational Meeting to tb. Community Summary Minut.s November 19, 2009 Mr. Mangan asked ifthere were any questions and there were none. He thanked everyone for attending and participating and encouraged the audience to complete comment cards. The audience applauded and the meeting concluded at 8:23 p.m. Minutes by Lisa Resnick 12/18/2009 2:40:33 PM 30 16 ~Il ~9/f~ Halas .- Henning SUMMARY MINUTES Coyle PEUCAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION ADVISORY BOARD AND PELICAN BAY ~ STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITfEE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLANNING JOINT WORKSHOP MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2009 II LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board and the Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee conducted a Joint Puhlic Workshop, Monday, November 30, 2009, 2:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, with the following members present: Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board Members Mary Anne Womble, Chairwoman Geoffrey Gibson (late arrival) Keith Dallas, Vice Chainnan Gerald Mofliltt (excused absence) Tom Cravens Theodore Raia, M.D. (excused absence) John Iaizzo Hunter Hansen (unexcused absence) Michael Levy Jill Kobe (unexcused absence) F r:::GEIVED FEB 1 9 2010 Board otCounty ~,_ .~ Pelican Bay Fouudation Strategic Planning Committee Members Bob Uek, Chainnan Mary Anne Womble Ronnie Bellone, OJ-Vice Chairwoman Ralph Ohlers (absent) Merlin Lickhalter, Co-Vice Chainnan Carson Beadle (absent) Noreen Murray Rose Mary Everett (absent) Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Neil Dorrill, Administrator Kyle Lukasz, Field Operatims Manager Mary McCaughtry, Recording Secretary Lisa Resnick, Administrative Assistant Pelican Bay Foundation Staff Jim Hoppenstead!, President Suzanne Minadeo, Executive Assistant Presentation By Kevin Mangan, Principal and Landscape Architect, Wilson Miller Steve Sammons, Sr. Associate and Landscape Architect, Wilson Miller AGENDA 1. Call to Order & Roll Call 2. Welcome and Review of Agenda 3. Discussion ofTowa Hall Meetings 4. Review of Updated Schedule 5. Review of Turkey Trot Event a. Philharmonic to Ridgewood Park b. Sandpiper Tram Station to the Commons including Pelican Bay Boulevard 6. North Tram Station a Site Plan Review b. Crosswalk Study A c. Crosswalk Study B d. Crosswalk Study C e. Crosswalk Study D 7. The Commous a. Concept A b. Concept B 8. Pelican Bay Boulevard Ridgewood Drive Intersection a Existing conditions b. Paver Pattern Alternative c. Roundabout Alternative 9. Pelican Bay Boulevard Cross Section a Vineyards Boulevard b. Bayshore Drive 10. Discussion :Te.s ';::~~;;::"'-;::".'="""",,, 31 l~mi "Ii ':-Y' ., i 1611 A9 .!Ii WilsQnMillet . November 30th PBSD and PBPC 60% Workshop Aaenda 2:00 to 4:00 pm Call to Order Welcome and Review of Agenda Discussion of Town Hall Meetings Review of Updated Schedule Review of Turkey Trot Event . Philharmonic to Ridgewood Park . Sandpiper Tram Station to The .Commons including Pelican Bay Boulevard North Tram Station . Site Plan Review . Crosswalk Study A . Crosswalk Study B . Crosswalk Study C . Crosswalk Study D The Commons . Concept A . Concept B Pelican Bay Boulevard Ridgewood Drive Intersection . Existing Conditions . Paver Pattern Alternative . Roundabout Alternative Pelican Bay Boulevard Cross Section . Vineyards Boulevard . Bayshore Drive Discussions 800.649.4336 239.649.4040 F 239.643.5716 3200 Bailey Lane Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 WilsonMlller.com Summary Minutes of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board & Pelican Bay Founlf2 slatlc Plann~g 9 Committee Community Improvements Planning Joint Workshop November 30, 2009 " ROLLCALL Five SeJVices Division BoanI members were present, although Mr. Gibson arrived late, to make six. Absent were Mr. Moffill, excused; Dr. Raia, excused; Mr. Hansen, W1Cxcused; and Ms. Jill Kobe, unexcused. Five Strategic Planning Committee members present Absent were Mr. Beadle, Ms. Everett, and Mr. Ohlers. WELCOME AND REVIEW OF AGENDA Mr. Kevin Mangan welcomed and thanked the BoanI and Committee members for their participation. They will present today the Phase I 60% Base Data Report, reviewing the finding Iiom the Tmkey Trot, North Tram Station, Commons, Pelican Bay Boulevard and Ridgewood Drive inteIliCC\ion, and describe a cross-section of Pelican Bay Bonlevard. DISCUSSION OF TOWN HALL MEETINGS Mr. Mangan recapped the November 19 Town Hall meetings. Based on positive community response, they will increase their community exposure. They scheduled two additional site walks, one for Phase II, and one for Phase Ill. The walks are a great way to see the community and based on communily interest determine locations. Attendance was approximately 45 for Session One and approximately fifteen for Session Two and those who attended he believes have a genuine interest in the Community Improvements Planning study. Mr. Merlin Lickhaher requested that well in advance, written., 8' x 10' hard copy notices be post in locations everywhere the Foundation will allow. Mr. Mangan said yes and they will advertise upoommg \twm l'tal\ medIDgl> by Jli>'I\ing hard ropy notices as soon as possible. Ms. Rounie Bellone asked ifwomen can attend the February 9 Men's Coffee or could it be videotaped. Mr. Iaizzo said to tell him how many women want to attend becanse two-hundred people attend Men's Coffee during season They can make accommodations. Mr. Lickbalter agreed the Foundation should film the Men's Coffee. Ms. Bellone said the video should play on CbanneI 95. She added briefupdates from all sessions and advertise future sessions via email blast. Mr. Bob Uek said they should invite other Foundation commiuee members to the Men's Coffee. Madam Chair Womble said there are meeting postcards on the tram where people get their information and they shonld put meeting and site walk notification cards on tile tram. 32 Summary Minutes of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board & Pelican Bay Foundatil ~atlc lnnin~ 9 Committee Community Improvements Planning Joint Workshop November 30, 2009 Mr. Lickhalt... said lhat is what he means by posting notices in all areas allowed by lhe Foundation. Mr. Tom Cravens said it is great they are brainstorming ideas on how to reach out to lhe larger community Boards and Committees already know what is going on. REVIEW OF UPDATED SCHEDULE Mr. Mangan provided an updated event schedule. They have added two additional site walks. One is January 14 fur Phase II and lhe date for Phase III walk is to be determined. Wilson Miller will present a Community Improvements Planning update to lhe Men's Coffee on February 9. Another community recommendation is to make a presentation to the President's Council and obtain consensus from respective associations and they will be in touch wilh Mr. McConnick to schedule and implement REVIEW OF TURKEY TROT Mr. Mangan began his presentation by reviewing the Turkey Trot site walks of November 25, 2009 Mr. Cravens asked how many people attended lhe Turkey Trot on November 25, 2009. Mr. Mangan said he and Mr. Sammons each led a site wall<. There were two on Mr. Mangan's Philharmonic to Ridgewood Park walk and five on Mr. Sammons' Sandpiper to lhe Commons walk. It was great based on lhe minimal participation and lhe poor wealh.... He presented maps oflhe site walks: Philharmonic to Ridgewood Park & Sandpiper to lhe Commons. He explained what lhey observed generally and made some simple overall recommendations in regards to improving entranceway aesthetics. MANGAN TOUR FROM PHILHARMONIC TO RIDGEWOOD PARK AND RETURN Mr. Mangan observed safety and security risks in private Ridgewood Park and recommended signage improvements to distinguish lhe boundaries. Ms. Bellone asked if lhey could install a monitored gate at the entrance to lhe park. Mr. Mangan said Ridgewood Park is a necessary geographic area oflhe study. A manned or electronic gate is a possibility, but lhe problem as he sees it is unclear boundaries. Th...e is a sign on lhe sidewalk designating the park is private, but not at lhe entrance. Mr. Lickhalter asked how long did the walk take, and iflhey saw any law enforcement or security. Mr. Mangan said the site walk took one-hour and forty-five minutes. They did not observe any law enfurcement or security. 33 16 11 1 A 9 Summary Miuutes of tbe Pelican Bay Services Division Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Community Improvements Planning Joint Worksbop November 30, 2009 SAMMONS TOUR FROM SANDPIPER TRAM STATION TO COMMONS Mr. Steve Sammons said five community members attended the Sandpiper Tram Station to the Commons site walk. They started at the Sandpiper Tram station parking lot and walked roundtrip, south along the community berm, to the Commons, and back up Pelican Bay Boulevard. He said there was probably less traffic because it was raining, but got a feel for the path. If not much traffic or only a few people, the feel is not as tight There seems to be certain areas where widening is possible to separate activities and gain a sense of safety. Plants could define the edge as a visual cue. Condominiums along the berm have pathway connections to buildings, so coordination with associations necessary. Potential fur overlook areas to serve dual function as rest stops. It is possible to add some vegetation to open areas to break up the length. Mr. Levy asked about widening the berm two to four feet. There is a lot of wildlife that use the grassy area on the sides to get out of the way of the tram, and if it is widened their safety zone may be gone. Mr. Cravens discussed safety issues and suggestions to widen the berm to prevent children from falling off the side into lbe water, which happened recently. Because another vehicle had fallen off the side at some point, there was a "rut" lbere and it prevented ber from falling into the water where there were baby alligators. Widening would eliminate the land security buffer and leave water 00 both sides, creating potentially dangerous conditions. Mr. Mangan said they are looking into additional edge treatments to JH'event accidents and overlook areas in areas animals already exist. Mr. Cravens' point is well taken. When improvements are challenged, other adjustments may need to be made to maintain balance. Mr. Cravens said people stop along lbe berm where wildlife is, however wildlife continues to move around so it would be difficult to recreate. Mr. Mangan said the areas lbey are looking at would serve a dual purpose as overlook and rest statim wilb shade between tram stations or Img stretch. THE COMMONS Mr. Sammons said that in the parking lot of the Commons there is a tight feel for vehicles and pedestrian traffic. Pedestrians walk in lbe roadway. At lbe nordt exit from of the Commoos onto Pelican Bay Boulevard there is a sharp turning radius, tire patt.....s are visible, vehicles have driven over some utilities, and sight visibility is limited for pedestrians and vehicles. They are looking for ways to create a safer environment. The palbways along Pelican Bay Boulevard are narrow in certain areas, and they are looking at ways to widen them based on existing 34 1611 A 9 Summary Minutes of tbe Pelican Bay Services Division Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Community Improvements Planning Joint Worksbop November 30, 2009 landscape, other options for materials, and cost implications. The crosswalk at Gulf Park Drive intersection is not identified adequately and kind of dumps pedestrians out into the roadway. Mr. Levy asked if stop sign is an "automatic" crosswalk that could effectively stop cars. Mr. Mangan said crosswalk ground pin or signage is missing at all Pelican Bay crosswalks. Madam Otair Womble said according to the County's Transportatioo deparlment, Gulfpark Drive and Pelican Bay Boulevard intersection is not a legitimate place for a crosswalks. The Services Division received complaints there was not enough light. The Transportatioo department's solutioo was to have people walk across Pelican Bay Boulevard, from the east to the west side, then cross hack over. Mr. Levy said he crosses that area frequeutly and there is room to cross. He recalls when the commooity wanted to move the lighting but not that a crosswalk was prohibited there. Mr. Cravens said there is a need to address the Gulf Park Drive and Pelican Bay Boulevard intersectioo crossing regardless of what the County thinks. It is a high pedestrian use area. Mr. Levy said there should be a crosswalk at Hyde Park and Pelican Bay Boulevard, across from the Commons fur people who want to go to the tram. Madam Otair Womble said th...e are termis courts th...e too. Mr. Mangan said there are a lot of supporting reasons for people to come to the Commons and they are reviewing that area. NORTH TRAM STATION SITE PLAN REVIEW Madam Chair Womble said there were so many complaints about the North Tram Station crossing that the Services Division installed signage and other designatioos to emphasize it. Mr. Mangan said they are looking toward an entire transportatioo solution. Mr. Cravens said they have done so much to draw attention to the North Tram Station crosswalk, but none of it has done any good. Mr. Levy said the signage is different at every crosswalk, so if there were consistent signage, people would know when they are approaching a crosswalk. Mr. Mangan said they are reviewing that infurmatioo fur prop... standards and consistency. Ms. Noreen Murray said Pelican Bay Boulevard and St. Raphael area near Commons provides berm access. 35 16' 1 ',A9 Summary Minutes of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board & Pelkan Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Commnnity Improvements Planning Joint Workshop November 30, 2009 Mr. Levy mentioned they discussed the Sandpiper crossing area at the last meeting. Mr. Mangan said they are looking at all areas mentiooed for solutions that confurm to transportation standards. Mr. Sammons said coming from the south of Pelican Bay Boulevard to cross Gulf Park Drive, it is intuitive to cross in the midblock section where many Sabal palms block street lighting and pathway areas to address. They are looking to address landscaping visibility issues in roadway medians that may require Sabal palm removal. The areas they are addressing cross through multiple properties that include areas of private ownership and County, so they will need to coordinate improvements with homeowners associations. Mr. Lickhalter said landscaping with grass only is not aesthetically pleasing and asked who was responsible for landscaping the grassy area at Crown Colony. What covenants govern that area and is enforcement proper. Mr. Sammons said landscaping between pathway and street is County property, but beyond pathways, any landscaping would require coordination with Crown Colony. Mr. Lickhalter said the Foundation's Director of Covenants is researching this issue to determine there is a requirement not enfurced by building inspector. He will report back when he receives answer. Mr. Mangan talked about the North Tram station and tram stations in general. They have observed some improvements made by covering the tram stops. They can better organize the seating arrangement and fiunishing. Extending the north side and this will create room for additional seating and shade. PAVER PATTERN ALTERNATIVES They can help tram drivers by clearing the difficult driving areas by replacing vegetation with pavers coated with high friction surfuce epoxy at the curb line and along the berm to help traffic flow, providing a "track." There may be a wide-ranging application for the high friction surtitce epoxy. They can add material to the high friction surfuce epoxy to create reflective product. They are looking at four potential crosswalk solutions in front of the North Tram station that are consistent and comply with traffic standards, construction costs ranging from $6-$10 per square !bot (unknown quantity) using combinatioos of concrete brick pavers and high friction surface material to help to slow traffic. Mr. Vek asked what the life expectancy of the product is. Mr. Mangan said granite would last the longest, but concrete paving products are credentialed, traffic rated for lite expectancy. 36 16 I lA (9 Summary Minutes oftbe Pelican Bay Services Division Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Community Improvements Planning Joint Worksbop November 30, 2009 Mr. Levy requested clarification of cost. Mr. Mangan said installation of the concrete pavers would require a concrete slab, reinfurced with mud and steel and would by a rough estimation, cost $ I 5 or more per foot. The high friction tactile rough surfuce does make an announcement. but used sparingly in a framing situation. CROSSWALK STUDIES Ms. Murray asked about for clarification of Study A, particularly the stop bar area. Mr. Mangan explained they would recommend high friction surfuce in that stop bar area, tan in color with reflective quality. Mr. Lickhalt... asked what the effuct of the paver blocks and high friction surface on bicycles. Mr. Mangan said bicycles can ride over them, but it slows them. Mr. Lickhalter said slowing bicycles is the key word and advantageous. Mr. Mangan said it is a common practice to ride over pavers, cobblestone streets. The surfaces will give a different fuel. Mr. Dallas said they are encouraging people to make u-turns where they want crosswalks and maybe there should be separation. Mr. Mangan said they depict a separation in Study D and he would discuss shortly. The County recommended putting a stop bar before the crosswalk for advance warning, in addition to the tactile surfuce. Both serve the same purposes they will make recommendations to use any combination ofmat...ial that will provide advance warning and announce the crosswalk. Studies C & D serve as total traffic solutions. Because th...e is no need fur the turn lane, they can widen the median and shorten the length the pedestrian has to walk in the roadway. The community on the east side of the Boulevard, the left turn lane and opening does not S<l'Ve their driveway cut but he can see where they use that lane to make u-turns to go the opposite direction. Mr. Dallas said the community complains the most about the crosswalks, so they should be able to give up something. Mr. Mangan said they provide a better crosswalk solution in Study D. Best solution would be to allow a left turn lane when heading northbound into the tram station parking lot and to allow a left turn when exiting, not a right then u-turn. Progression from A-D increases the complexity, time for construction, and inh...ent cost. Traffic patterns that are proper to the tram station parking lot be put into place and that would shorten by one length the 37 16 , 1 A... ,~ """'; j" Summary Minutes of tbe Pelican Bay Services Division Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Commnnity Improvements Planning Joint Worksbop November 30, 2009 time pedestrians are in the roadway. A & B improves the crosswalk; C & D is totally solution. Mr. Mangan said they are looking toward an entire transportation solution. Mr. Oavens asked what kinds of research did 1hey do and wbat information was used to develop tbe designs. He and assumes others do too, become accustomed to driving routes and the ooly place people will stop is at a stop sign. He does not want to spend mooeyon not researched information. Mr. Mangan clarified 1he stop bars are there to support the small sign that reads, "Automohiles should stop for pedestrians in crosswalk." Mr. Lickhalter added "and bicycles." Mr. Mangan said, yes and bicycles. Bicyclists are responsible for following 1he rules of1he roadway. Mr. Oavens said bicyclists never stop at stop signs. Mr. Mangan said visibility requirements must confurm to state standard and the supporting documentation is 1he traffic standard. State standards consider a stop bar to be supplemental to a high visibility crosswalk. Madam Olair Womble said 1here is also a line of sight from 1he n<rth point to 1he south that would be extremely beneficial because of the curve on Pelican Bay Boulevard. The intuitive crossing area is at the opening to 1he parking lot. Where 1hey are walking now, the visibility is far less. Going south on Pelican Bay Boulevard, the parking area where cars turn there is better visibility and a better identified as a place to be careful. Mr. Mangan said 1he County's Transportation department is aware the Pelican Bay community is interested in improving 1hat intersection however it may not be a simple task of just painting the crosswalk, but there is recognition of desire to improve. They are an empirically minded group with set standards. Their argument is the fuet it is a midblock intersection crossing and 1here is not another midblock crossing until just past Tierra Mar and 1hen the North Tram Station. Because it is a midblock intersection, there is no way to make that crossing using signage or striping. Madam Omir Womble asked ifmoving 1he crosswalk is under consideratioo. The County's solution was to move the median back. Mr. Mangan said no because the driveway cut allows adequate visibility, although removing Sabal palms would make it better fur greater visibility. It would give a better field of vision and provide a total traffic solution for both 1he Boulevard, and entry and exit areas of the Tram Station parking lot 00 the eastern side curb cuts. 38 1611-"A9 Summary Minutes of tbe Pelican Bay Services Division Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Community Improvements Planning Joint Worksbop November 30, 2009 Ms. Murray requested clarification of the difference between Studies C & D, acknowledging C does not move the entry. Mr. Mangan said C does not move the entry, but C takes away tbe deceleration left turn lane, widening the median and shortening the pedestrian crossing. Mr. Lickhalter said Mr. Mangan has spoken a lot about reduced visibility in medians generally and complemented him on the design that visibility becomes adequate by removing the Sabal pahns. Mr. Dallas said he likes Study D, but trees in the crosswalk area block lighting. He assumes they would address. Mr. Mangan said yes, the light has a Sabal palm growing through it and they are suggesting a complete solution. Mr. Dallas asked when they would have a cost estimate available. Mr. Mangan said December 2 that he could provide broad preliminary information about cost. They are moving along toward consistency, connectivity and putting crosswalks into existence where they do not. Mr. Gibson said he likes Study D too, but they need to provide costs to the residents. He believes the community will recommend and he agrees that a $500 stop sign would solve the problem and reduce traffic on Pelican Bay Boulevard. Mr. Mangan said that he agrees, but he highly doubts the County would allow a stop sign. Mr. Gibson said if they cannot place a stop sign at the intersection, then would a crosswalk like the one at Myra Janco Daniels be an alternative and cost effective solution. Mr. Mangan said when they price the projects out, then they will know, but he believes the Myra Janco Daniels crosswalk was about $45,000 and Study D costs a lot more than $45,000. Mr. Gibson said if they do this first and do right, it might set the stage fur the future and the community can see what is to come. He suggested they install a sign or arrow at the exit to the parking lot to let people know they cannot go left. Mr. Dallas said it would be nice if they placed a crosswalk in an area that does not require moving medians. He asked if they have an estimate of how much it would cost to install the crosswalk. 39 161 1 A9 Summary Minutes of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Community Improvements Planning Joint Workshop November 30, 2009 Mr. Cravens said they have had many complaints and people are looking for immediate solutions to existing conditions. Based on the designs, they do not appear to be immediate solutions and will take some time to implement and asked what the timeline is. Mr. Mangan said conceptual work would be complete in December 2009. He suggested the Services Division as responsible for public lands in the right of ways, might consider moving all crosswalk solutions forward quickly. It would take a several months to go through the contractor selection and permitting process in order to implement Study A, B, C, or D. It has become clear that crosswalks need to be consistent, add them where they are missing, and put in place properly. For pedestrian safuty sake, he recommended moving forward. Mr. Levy said what makes the North Tram station crosswalk more critical than other places where there are no crosswalks. Mr. Mangan said he was speaking generally. Mr. Gibson said a short-term and temporary solution could be to place a pylon or signage in the middle of the roadway. Mr. Mangan said signage is available. What they are looking for is consistency amongst crosswalks communitywide. Mr. Dorrill said suggested having an exhibit that shows all of the tram stations. Mr. Mangan said they could provide detail to the graphic design distributed at the November 17 workshop. Mr. Durrill referred to Mr. Cravens' comment that research based information should dictate conclusions, that Jeff Perry, Wilson Miller's Transportation planner review and make comments about that particular location the way it is now, and how it used to be adjacent to the driveway. Why would the design not be done the same way and move it to the north, adjacent to the new driveway. Mr. Mangan said if the crosswalk stays where it is, it leads the pedestrian directly to the berm and allows them to capture twelve teet from the turn lane that is no longer in use, and shortens the time the pedestrian is in 1he roadway. They will get an opinion from Mr. Perry. Mr. Durrill said 1hey should consider renaming tram stations in a way that identifies 1heir location. Current number system does not mean anything to people outside ofthe community. Mr. Cravens agreed. Mr. Mangan said they could consider choosing names that express the community, like Disney. 40 16' 1 A9 ... Summary Minut.. of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Community Improvements Planning Joint Workshop November 30, 2009 Mr. Dorrill asked if1here are berm location markers for pedestrians and bicyclists. Mr. Cravens said there are location markers. Mr. Dorrill asked if a needs assessment was performed to determine if parking at fucilities communitywide is sufficient. Mr. Cravens said during heavy season, 1hey have maxed nut parking, but is okay during 1he rest of the year. Mr. Hoppensteadt agreed 1ha! 1he Commons has a parking problem sometimes. Mr. Mangan said 1he Commons parking lot is cumntly counter intuitive to 1he activities taking place. They could maximize space by reorganizing it wi1h a goal for no net loss. Mr. Lickhalter asked how realistic is it really to reorganize 1he space, i.e., how will tractor-trailers making deliveries be able to back up to delivery area/loading dock. He said 1here was discussion ofthe Foundation not using 1he Commons as it currently does, but he is not sure of 1he decision. Will some of 1hese solutions and how will1hey have an impact on existing structures. Mr. Vek asked how many parking spaces 1hey could create by reorganizing. Mr. Mangan said 1hey did not know yet. Ms. Noreen Murray said adding directional pathway signs from parking area to tram station might help penple get 1heir bearings. Mr. Mangan agreed and called 1he directional signage, ''way-finding signage." The Commons is a high multiuse fucility and if some of its functions move somewhere else, 1he solution would solve itself, not have a cost, and 1here would be more parking lot area to traverse and that was a good point. PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD AND RIDGEWOOD DRIVE INTERSECTION EXISTING CONDITIONS Mr. Mangan addressed 1he Pelican Bay Boulevard and Ridgewood Drive intersection. They are looking into ways to slow traffic there. Pelican Bay Boulevard is an entrance point and a road traveled to make choices for commercial and residential areas, but also a very public roadway and should 1herefure be "dressed up" to annOlBlce 1he community. He acknowledged 1he sheriff's deparbnent likes to leave 1heir cars turned on in 1he median, so it is possible to plan for an area to serve that purpose and avoid future damage. 41 16 , I A9 .. Summary Minutes of tbe Peliean Bay 8orvi... Division Board & Pelican Bay FoundatiOll Strategic Planning Committee Community Improvements Planning Joint Worksbop November 30, 2009 ROUNDABOUT ALTERNATIVE Mr. Mangan said because it is a tOur-way intersection with a two-way stop, a roundabout is a possibility with a singular landscaping reatur., i.e., tOuntain. They must recognize the furtl".. from the center of the circle; sight limitations exist and address how one must be able to see the line of traffic. Ms. Murray said rotaries are better to keep traffic flowing and the design removes the stop sign. There is a need to account tOr pedestrian visibility. Mr. Mangan said a roundabout or traffic circle is a traffic calming solution that slows traffic. Mr. Uek said they should invite people from the Philharmonic to the next meeting to ask about their views on traffic at peak and non-peak bours. Mr. Lickhalter said the design points out that a roundabout does limit pedestrian exposure to traffic by giving them tOur areas to seek refuge. Mr. Mangan said all traffic-calming solutions need testing at alllneations during peak and non-peak times. They must strike a balance that serve pedestrians ultimately. Madam Chair Womble asked ifheading east on Pelican Bay Boulevard toward US 41 would change. Mr. Mangan said that intersection would not change. PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD CROSS SECTION Mr. Mangan addressed a question asked at one of the past workshops about the width of travel lanes on Pelican Bay Boulevard and Vineyards Boulevard. VINEYARDS BOULEVARD He measured the Vineyards Boulevard roadway as two ten feet wide travel lanes, one tOur fuet wide bicycle lane, and eight feet wide sidewalks. They had thought there were two-eleven fuet wide travel lanes. This is important because Pelican Bay Boulevard measures two twelve feet wide travel lanes, the same overall dimension of twenty-four fuet. BAYSHORE DRIVE Bayshore Drive measures two-ten feet wide motor vehicle travel lanes, and one four fuet wide bicycle lane. DISCUSSION Mr. Levy asked if two-twelve fuet motor vehicle lanes are sater than two-ten feet wide lanes sharing on<>- four feet wide bicycle lane. If a bicycle lane is not dedicated, a car is more likely to move over for the bicyclist. If 42 16 , I Summary Minutes of tbe Pelican Bay Services Division Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Community Improvements Planning Joint Worksbop November 30, 2009 there are two ten fuel wide motor vehicle lanes and a dedicated four fuel wide bicycle lane, then motorists are more likely to stay in their lanes because both have a have a dedicated space. Mr. Mangan said there has been some research done, but he would have to look into it and get back. Mr. Uek asked if on Wednesday they would have solutions for this. Mr. Mangan said a solution would come in Phase II, but certainly, crosswalks or for whatever the reason, if the group feels they should take action quickly, they can address immediately. He thanked everyone and concluded the presentation. The meeting adjourned at 4: 17 PM. Minutes by Lisa Resnick 12/30/200910:12;33 AM 43 .' A9 SUMMARY MINUTES PELICAN BAY SERVICES DMSION ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 2, 2009 , . . '. r..:" 16111A9 un IT BE REMEMBERED that the Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on Wednesday, Dttember 2, 2009 at 1:00 PM in Regular Session at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8%0 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples with the following members present Pelican Bay Servi""s Division Adrisory Board Members Mary Anne Womble, ChairwolDan Michael Levy Keith Dallas, Vice Chairman Gerald Moffillt TOlD Cravens Hunter Hansen Geoffrey Gibson Jill Kobe (absent) John laizzo (departed 3 p.rn) Theodore Raia (excused absence) Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Neil Dorrill, Administrator Kyle Lukasz, Field Operations Manager Mary McCanghtIy, Recording Secretary Lisa Resnick, Administrative Assistant Community Improvements Plan Update Presentation Kevin Mangan, Principal & Landscape Architect, Wilson Miller AGENDA l. RollCall 2. Wilson Miller Commnnity Improvement Planning Update 3. Approval of Swnmary Meeting Minutes a. November 4,2009 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session b. November 10, 2009 Community Improvements Plan Joint Workshop 4. Audience Participation 5. Administrator's Report a. North Tnun Station P<desUiau Safety Issues update b. Monthly Financial Report c. Discussion of independent review and financier ofPBS & J Report (Mr. Dorrill add-on) 6. ChaiIwomau's Report a. Commnnity Improvement Planning Dual Involvement Update b. Notice of Upcoming Meetings 7. Capital Projects 8. Commnnity Issues 9. Committee Reports and/or Requests 10. Old Business 11. New Business a. Fertilizer order and utilization lrncking system discussion (T. Cravens) 12. Miscellaneous Correspondence a. Ongoing Projects Stalos Sheet 13. Audience Comments 14. Adjonnunent ROLLCALL All Board members were present wi1b the exception of Ms. Jill Kobe and Dr. Ted Raia, excused. Ms. Kobe had apparently confirmed her IIItendance IICCOllIp8llied bJ' Mr. John Baron, her recommendation to replace her membership on the Board upon her resignation. She has not yet resigned. Mr. Cravens asked if a Board member resigns. or if there is a vacancy, is a qnorum based upon the nmnber of remaining seats, or the number of total board seats both held and vacant. 8249 16 , I A 9 II! Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 Madam Chair Womble said in that in the past, they based a quorum upon the percentage of members present and serving at the time, This is a good question and they should address, Mr. Dorrill said Ms. McCaughtry did pose that question to Ms. Sue Filson, Executive Manager to the Board of County Commissioners. Ms, Filson stated the number of members present must be one more than the majority of current total of serving members. In this case, if the total number of members is ten, a quorum is six members present He suggested an agenda item following roll call be approval of today' s agenda. He recommended an add-on item to the Administrator's report, 5 C regarding his proposal to perfonn an independent peer review of the PBS & J Clam Bay Analysis report. Mr, en",,,,.. suggested the Board add "Agenda Apptm'a/" to the formal agenda to enable Board members to add emergency items, Madam Chair agreed and directed staIf. WILSON MILLER COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLANNING UPDATE Mr. Mangan said the Wilson Miller Conummity Improvements Planning Team is on schedule to present their conceptual design Phase I report on December 9. They have delivered four presentations, two town hall presentations, two community site walks, and three joint wmkshops with the Services l)Yfflioo ~ :md Sttategic Planning Committee. Resulting from positive community response, they have added additional community site walks and meetings to the process, He thanked Mr. Hoppensteadt for including community updates in the Pelican Bay Post As Phase I is closed out, the infonnation will be posted and provide information about upcoming events. Focus has been ou identifying areas and elements where they can introduce best management practices, i.e., regarding landscaping, limit sod to reduce water consnmption and fertilizer use, removing unhealthy and bannful vegetation for safety and functionality improvements such as those that are blocking street lighting. They are looking for lighting delivery improvements, in tenus of functionality and energy efficiency, i.e., replal;:ing lamp bulbs with LED lighting a1 entranceways to address security issues. They requested incident infonnation from the Sheriff's office that are traffic and criminal related to improve security and safety and to make recommendations for traffic calming, including recommendations for pedestrian safety, introducing high visibility markings and make recommendations for consistency amongst crosswalks. They are also looking for possibilities to widen pathways. Upon review of PUD permits, codes, development orders, they have not yet found any non-compliance issues and are wm:king with consultants Turrell, Hall, & Associates and Agnoli, Batbcr, & Brundage to make SW'e they understand easements preserve, wetlands, and other environmental issues. He opened the floor to questions. 8250 Pelican Bay Semces Division Board Regolar Sessioo Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 1611 A9 Mr. Gibson complimented the Community Improvements Planning team for immediate issues related to North Tram Station crosswalk. He distributed photos of a "Stop for Pedestrians in Crosswalk" signs located at intersections at the Naples Beach Hotel and Golf Club. He said placing these signs within the intersections would be an inexpensive and interim solution worth looking into. Mr. Mangan said the signs would be good, at not only the North Tram Station but also communitywide for consistency, especially where no crosswalks exist. Madam Chair Womble asked if permits were needed to inslall the signs. Mr. Mangan said the sign would supplement a total shon-tenn phased solution. Mr. Dallas said the Naples Beach Hotel and Golf Club has one lane in each direction and in Pelican Bay there are two lanes going in each direction and would need to address. Mr. Levy said the Naples Beach Hotel and Golf Club also has staff in front of the hotel to pick up the signs if they are knocked down. Mr. Cravens said there is a security person stationed at Nol1h Tram Station 8 who could take care of downed signs and referred to Mr. Hoppensteadt. Mr. Hoppensteadt said yes and no """"""" someone is not there regularly. Mr. Gibson said he is surprised a major incident has not happened. From the people he talked to, such as dog walkers and others who walk the area two to three times daily, they say the residents are not the problem. The problem is non-residents using Pelican Bay Bonlevard as an escape route from U.S. 41 at 8 AM and 4 PM to 5:30 PM. He understands they are looking into a long-tenn solntion, but this would be an inexpensive short-term solution. Madam Chair Womble said she has oOOelVed workers in Pelican Bay racing through the resideutial areas when they leave in the evening. Mr. Mangan said he would find out the permit requirements and get back. Mr. Crnvens said this discussion should be referred to item 5 A because it is more appropriate. Madam Chair Womble thanked Mr. Mangan for the update. APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 4. 2009 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD REGULAR SESSION SUMMARY MINUTES Mr. Crnvens made a motion to approve the Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes of November 4,2009. Mr. Dallas seconded the motion. 8251 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 16JIA9 ... Madam Chair Womble as if there was any discussion. Mr. Levy said on page 8142, the number of petitions should be 2,400, nol 24,000. Madam Chair said on page 8232, lhe Services Division and the Foundation Board should approve the need for ordering additional "Waler Runs Through If' DVD's. There was no further discussion and a Board vole was taken. The minutes were approved as amended unanimously. Mr. Cravens nuuIe a motion to approve the Pelican Bay Services Dirision Board Regular Session Summary Minutes of November 4, 1(}(J9. Mr. Dallas seconded the motion. A Board vote was taken and the minutes """" lIS U1IU!Ifde4 . APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 10. 2tlO9 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD AND FOUNDATION STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITfEE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN JOINT WORKSHOP SUMMARY MINUTES Mr. Dallas made a motion to approve the November 10, 2009 PeIk:an Bay Services Division Board and Foundation SlIalegic Planning Committee Community lmprovemenls Plan loint Workshop SUlUll1lII)' Minules. Mr. Levy seconded. There was no discussion and a Board vote was laken. The minutes were approved as is nruutimously. Mr. DaUas nuuIe a motion to approve the Nl1rIeIfIbn- 10, 2IJ09 Pe1ictm Bay Services Division Board and FOImdation Strotegic PImrning C...._. ;_ COIIIItIIUfity Improvements Planning Study Joint Workshop S"",,,,tUY Minlltes. Mr. Levy seconded, There was no discussion and a Board vote was token. The minutes ~ oved as is unanimouslv. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Mr. Steve Seidel from San Marino asked Mr. Mangan aboul bow much attention has been paid to driveway visibility. He is upsel because lhe entrance to the Commons has small flag and he said a larger flag, such as the one at lhe Bay Colony entrance he placed lhere. Madam Chair Womble said she liked Mr. Seidel's idea and the Foundation could address !his. Mrs. Marcia Crnvens reli:rred to agenda item II regarding fertilizer tracking and utilization. Biological Monitoring reports over the past ten years reporred repeatedly that there is a nitrogen and phosphorus spike. The timing occurs at the same time as fertilization. Heavy rains and nmoff accumulates in Clam Bay. The spotlight is on Clam Bay right now and, "it would be really dumb to continue in the same vein thaI has been done every year and make a notation lhat lhe spike is happening again, and, guess what, it happens when we do our fertilization program. I guess our water management system is working because it does not always show up in the Bay. I hope that everyone take heed and 8252 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 1611 A 9 . please take action today to do something to gain control over the arnolDlt of fertilizer, pesticides and other chemicaJs thaI are used and end up in Clam Bay." ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT Mr. Dorrill said he dislributed a newly formatted and much improved financial report. The income statement is only for the primary genernl fund to fOClJS on large dollar arnolDlls and variances. The report provides the adopled or amended budget, actual expenditures, and associated variances for revenue and expenditure sources. While budgeted revenues were anticipated to be $2.26 million, actual was s1iglnly less at $2.19 million. This is due to residents who chose to take advantage receiving a discount for paying their property taxes prior to being delinquent. Projected expenses were $2.47 million, while actual expenses were $2.2 million, less than budgeted. When he became Administrator, they discussed deficit or loss spending. The Board was planning to "bum down" excess accumnlated cash reserves as opposed to allowing an artificially high tax assessment to appear on the tax bill. Because not as much was spent as projected overall, the projected loss of$300,000 was only S40,000, so there is approximately $250,000 remaining. Higher projections were made for expenses related to fuel, maintenance, and personnel. He expects the budget process to work better willi the help of the Budget subcommittee. He if, still coocemed now \he Coon\)> treats fixed assets and how they are depreciated. Depreciation does not appear on individnal balance sheets and he asked the County to produce balance sheets by fund willi the actual cash position at the beginning of the year. He has more questions for the County. Mr. laizzo asked about capilal. The vehicles are paid for by the community, but who owns them. Mr. Dorrill said they are titled in the name of the Board of County Commissioners but !bey shonld appear on the Services Division's balance sheet as a fixed depreciable asset. Mr. Iaizzo said he would like to see that changed and titled in the name of the community. Mr. Dorrill said the community as a whole does not own any of the assets because the Services Division is a pari of the County government. For purposes of proper accounting and inventory control, those assets must be shown as owned by Pelican Bay Services Division funds, not some Connty' s catchall. Mr. Moffiltt asked when they conld expect to see the 2010 interim results. He likes the September 2009 format. It wonld be nice to see on a monthly or quarterly basis a comparison ofbudgeted and actual expenditures. Mr. Dorrill said he is expecting to show this type of balance sheet infonnation monthly and have a broader discussion quarterly and a budget workshop in Febnwy, before the County Manager announces his budget calendar. 8253 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes ~mber2,2009 1611 A9 ~ 1 Mr. Dallas asked when the budget subcommittee started meeting last year. Mr. Moffatt said it might have been December. They had several meetings where they focused on the prior year's budget, but should not be necessary this year. Febrmuy is probably a good time to start in orner to be finished oy the end of May. Mr. Dorrill said that is why he is suggesting Febrmuy. They should be getting midyear actual around that time, which is a good indicator of overall financial condition. Most people have paid their ad-valorem and nou ad-valorem taxes, which includes the assessmeut, by that time. Madam Chair Womble asked the budget subcommittee if they wanted to meet in February. Mr. Levy said they should establish a date for Febrmuy. Madam Chair Womble said she believes the Budget Subcommittee met on Tuesday afternoons. Mr. Levy said they met on Tuesday afternoons and the dates could not conflict with the Community huprovemeuts PIauuing workshops. Mr. Moffatt said to find out what dates are reserved and go from there. Madam Chair Womble asked Ms. McCaughlly if any dates were held and there may be Safety Committee meetings reserved that they could use. Ms. McCaughtry said she would check reservations with Ms. Margaret Evans at the Community Center. Because it is a small group, finding a room is not difficult generally. Mr. Hansen asked Mr. Dorrill about the opernting fund statement under right of way beautification field category expenses, line item other operating supplies, the "other" line items could be itemized to find out where speuding is getting out ofhaud, rnther than hnuping it into "other." Mr. Dorrill said he is not big on miscellaneous expense categories. In Florida, they are bound by the State Chart of Accounts, a uniform accounting system, where there are additioual and nwre de<;cripti.ve line items they can use to get away from "catchall," or "miscellaneous" categories. Mr. Levy said especially when the categories are overrull. Mr. Dorrill said if there are no other questions, it should be the Board's prnctice to accept these unaudited financial reports discussed today. Mr. Moffatt made a motion to accept the unaudited financial repl>rts that Mr. Dorrill discussed today. Mr. Dallas seconded. A Board vote was taken and approved unanimously. 8254 1611 A9 ... Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 Mr. Moffatt _tie II m0ti0IlW IIIXept the I1IIDU,/;#-' fimmdal reports tltat Mr. DorriH discussed . Mr. DaIliJs _tied. A Board vole was tIIken and IIlIfIIIimo ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (ADD ON) DISCUSSION OF PBS & J CLAM BAY ANALYSIS: INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW & FINANCIER Mr. Dorrill explained there bas been general concern of the PBS & J Clam Bay Analysis report, in particular as it appears to criticize or portray historical worl< inaccurately or incompletely to reach conclusious. "I have heard you," and has been worl<ing with the County Manager and his staJf to propose a starting point to address concerns. From his understanding, the top concern is the conclusion that the Pelican Bay Services Division should have or required to report historical water quality. data into STORET, the State of Florida's water quality da1ahase. He would like to get closure on the historical work to date, what are their obligations as a governmeolal entity with respect to STORET. There are other issues concerning observation, the way samples arc collected,. that sampling locations and technique are important, and clarification needed. There is a generic statement concerning certain limited errors made in reporting prior to 2005. They are quick to say there is no indication of error in data after 2005, but he would like to get further information on that. Finally, the original methodology used in the circulation model and perfonned by this community, this Board, and is part of the public record, leads to the conclusion, or some underlying concern that water of the Clam Bay system is impaired verifiably. That is what bas been most disturbing. He has offenxl, subject to the BoanI' s approval, a proposal to the County Manager that he bas accepted. that jointly, the Services Division and Coastal Zone Management department jointly select and timd an independent third party in a non-amsulting role, who has a mtional reputation representing an academic or institute or part of a university system. A recommendation was made from the University of Florida, but he would have to get hack with the individual's name and vitae information. This individual would review the work perfonned by the Services Division historically and the Post Bucldey report before any further work is authorized. The County Manager agrees this is a better idea than having a "firestonn" before the County Commission. He was very quick to tell him the Clam Bay Advisory Comminee will sunset on December 31. By ordinance, an update must be provided although it will now be conditioned by the Services Divisioo's concerns in onler to do two tbings: seek an extension of the cnrrent sunset of the Clam Bay Advisory Board, and broadening the budget and scope for further water quality data collection, and or modeling that would also be subject to peer review. This will be recommended to the County Commission on December 15. Although he is a contrnct employee, Mr. Dorrill reports to the County Manager, Leo Oebs. They met at lunchtime today and he infonned Mr. Oehs regarding the PBS & J report, although it is what it is at this point and narrowly approved by the Coastal Zone and Clam Bay Advisory Boards, there 8255 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 16 rIA 9 k"" appears to be some valid concerns that need additional clarification. Mr. Ocbs is in support of that. He asked for comments and consensus by the Board 10 pursue. Mr. Cravens said he liked how Mr. Dorrill is proceeding, however his only concern is thai he wonld like more information about the person or group under considemtion to perform the peer review and seek advice from an organizalion like the Conservancy 10 make recommendations as 10 who would be a good choice. Mr. Dorrill said il was his proposal 10 recommend an independent peer review by someone with nationally recognized academic credentials, such as the Mote Marine Laboratory. University of Miami al Coral Gables. or University of Florida, or somewhere oot there where there is someone perceived 10 be an expert on mangrove back bay systems adjacenllo the Gulf of Mexico. He is tIying to move away from wbal appears 10 be professional jealousy and competing interest between big consulting firms looking for work. Mr. Moffatt said he agrees with much of what Mr. Dorrill has proposed. To ensure the peer review does happen, he is willing 10 offer that the Services Division pay for the eotire study. If the Services Division pays 100%, they do not have to wony about County budgetary restraints. If the review is this important to Pelican Bay, then it should be done regardless of the cost. He asked Mr. DorriB what he estimates the cost to be. Mr. Dorrill said a peer review should be ongoing as a coudi1IDn of any technical work to be done in this very fragile, very important environmental system. 'The County budget staIf allocated $50,000 for all work that would occur this fiscal year, so the immediate need for a thorough peer review of historical work 10 date would be approximately $10,000, but if he is incorrect, would report back, once the scope of services is identified. Mr. Dallas said an independent peer review is a good idea, but the expert should be considered "above the fray" and ioformation about that person vetted early. h is very important that everyone respect the expert. Mr. Dorrill said that is why he recommends soliciting input but the decision be made jointly by the Services Division Board and Coastal Zone Management departmenL Mr. laizzo asked if there could be a pool of three candidates. Mr. DorriIJ said he did not know bow many candidates there would be; he recommends the person nol be an affiliale of any engineering or consulting finn, but an academic institution. Madam Chair Womble recognized people in the audience who may have information on scientifically based experts for this type of report. Mrs. Cora Obley said the CoastaI Zone Management peer review budget was reduced 10 $5,000. 8256 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 16 rIA 9 Mr. Dorrill said from what he understands, Mr. Gary McAlpin, Director of Coastal Zone Management reduced the budget for independent expert peer review from $50,000 to $5,000 and $5,000 is not sufficient to begin to address /hese issues. He suggested /he Services Division request from the Boatd of County Commissioners a budget amendment to fund at whatever level is appropriate. As Mr. Moffatt has suggested, if /he Services Division decides to pay for all of it by phase, that is a policy decision this Board will have to make. Madam Chair Womble said, "And even more incredible is Mr. Moffutt is Co-Chair of the Budget subcommittee. I think you are rigllt, Jeny." Ms. Cravens said /here are several knowledgeable people involved with /he Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Project (CERP) who she said are "arove the flay" with worldwide credentials. Mr. McAlpin's suggestion to use Dr. Robert Dean, University of Florida is questionable. Madam Chair Womble suggested Ms. Cravens provide names and recommendations to /he Board through /he Services Division office. Ms. Cravens said if this Board is recommending using Pelican Bay assessment dollars to pay for /he study. this Board should be actively involved in the selection process, not just the Administrator. Mr. Dorrill said he did not suggest the decision be made by the Administlator. He added that someone involved in CERP migllt be 'Just as tainted" as any other expert, the reas;m why they should solicit as much information as they can, and a decision made jointly by this Board and /he Coastal Zone Management department He recommended a motion be made and vote taken authorizing the Chairwoman to draft an appropriate response to the County Manager to request an independent expert peer review of the PBS & J Clam Bay AnalYsis report for work performed to date. The expen should be nationally recognized with academic credentials and unaffiliated wi/h any engineering or consulting firm. This expen shall also be selected and paid for jointly by the Servi<>:s n;visIDn and Public Services Division/Coastal Zone Management department. In addition to a review of the PBS & J recent analysis report, /he peer review would require an acceptable scope of services including historical water qnality collection me/hods, lab analysis, and modeling. This effort should move forward to allow the Board of County Commissioners to address at their December 15 meeting. Mr. Moffatt asked for clarification of the motion. If the Coumy cannot find the other baIf of the funds to pay for independent review, that Pelican Bay would fund 100"10. 8257 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Snmmary Minntes December 2, 2009 16rlA9 p Mr. Dorrill said it was Mr. Moffatt's suggestion that the SeIVices Division fund 100"10. TIle motion would be that if the County cannot find the other half of funds to pay for independent review that Pelican Bay would fund 100% of the first phased independent peer review. Mr. Moffatt said he would use the offer to fund 100"10 as a fallback position, not initial offer. Madam Chair Womble requested Mr. Moffatt make a motion to go forward with the letter to the County Manager with concerns and suggestions. Mr. Darrill said he believes it is importam that the Services Division select individnal and fund jointly, but if necessmy fund the entire amount oftloe peer review. Mr. laizzo said if the Services Division does not have complete control, then why they should fund 100%. Mr. Darrill said they would have control during the selection process and it is important enough for them to pay for half of that He said from what be understands it is important enough to Mr. Moffatt to have it done and done objectively to agree to pay the full 100"/.. Mr. Iaizzo said he believed the County was behind getting this done Mr. Dorrill said not at a level sufficient to address the Services Division's immediate needs. Their peer reviews are for future efforts to collect data and modeling. By then, sometime next year, it will be too late. Mr. Moffatt said the report issued by PBS & J is devastating to Pelican Bay. Mr. Levy said even if the Services Division pays 100%. it is still important that the County select the expert jointly. The expert should be acceptable to both. Mr. laizzo said if the County chooses the expert with the Services~ Division joint, tloey would have to accept, even if the results come back womble. If they did nOl have a choice in selection, tloen they do not have to accept results by that particular party. Ms. Bellone said the Foundation and Strntegic Planning Committee having worked with the Services Division. jointly splitting decisions and cost, that it is important for the Services Division to follow the same path with the County, jointly selecting expert and funding study. Mr. laizzo said if the Services Division "goes our own way, we will he twned down by the County.'" Mr. Moffatt said be is not suggesting they go their own way, but do everything jointly . If the County caunot find the budget dollars, then the Services Division can step up to the plate and finKllOO"Io. Mr. Dallas said that takes away one of their arguments regatding affordability. Mr. Cmvens asked for a question on the motion. 8258 16 f 1 A9 Pelican Bay Service. Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 Madam Chair Womble asked for a clarificatioo of the motion. Mr. Donill said the motirn is to authaize the Services Division Chair to fOrward rorresprndmce to the County Manager that identifies their ~s thai he indicated. To obtain clarification, the Services Division offers to select and fund jointly, an independent third party expert to perform a peer review of !x,th the historical data performed by the Services Division and review of the more recent Post Buckley Clam Bay Analysis report. Mr. Iaizzo asked if that letter cooId be ,tated by Mr. Dorrill and signed by the Chairwoman. Mr. Dorrill said he could write it, and probably would. Mr. Cravens said he thought the Chair, with staff assistance, would p<cpare and to copy all Board members. Mr. Moffatt made a motion to authorize the ChailWoman, with staff assistance, to fOlWard correspondence to the County Manager that idmtifies the Services Division's concerns and desire for clarification of conclusions made by PHS & J in their October 2009 Clam Bay Analysis report. To obtain this clarification, the Services Division offers to select and fund jointly an independent thUd-party expert to perform a peer review of both Services Division historical data and the PHS & J Clam Bay Analysis. Mr. Dallas seconded the motioo. A Board vote in favor Wlanimous1y carried the motion. Mr. Moffatt mode a motion to tudhorir,e the CIuUnvoman, Mth staff assistmree, to forward correspondem:e to the Cmmty Manager that identifies tire Services Division's concerns and desire for clarificotimr of conchlsimrs mode by PBS & J in their October 2009 am" Bay Anatps;s report To obtain this clarification, the Services Division tHen to seIet:t and fllllll joinlly an iru/epeIIdmt thirtt.party expot to perform a peer review ofbotlr Services Division lristorical dam and the PBS & J Clam Bay Analysis. The peer review woIIld require an acreptable scope if """,ices including historical methods for wafer quality collection, bib tura{vsis, and modeling. Mr. Dallas se<:OIU/ed the motion. A Board vote in favor unanimousl/1 carried tire motion. CHAIRWOMAN'S REPORT COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN DUAL INVOLVEMENT UPDATE Madam Chair Wcmble provided a recap that Mr. Mangan's CommWlity lmp<ovemc'1lts Plan updates included some suggestions and possibilities for crosswalks and street lighting. Mr. Carmine Marcino from the Collier County Sheriff's office would p<ovide a North Tram Station crosswalk and pedestrian safety update when he arrives. She received a letter about the south end of Green Tree and Gulf Park Drive. There is a limited amount of light there due to a canopy of trees and Mr. Mangan will address the area. The Strategic Planning Committee reviewed the seven priaities identified as part of the master plan and some are romplere, including air conditioning to the Sandbar, windows and doors upgraded at Sandbar, Sandpiper and Sunset, cedar reinforced with metal, mmus revamped, and safety and 8259 Pelican Bay Services Dh1sion Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 16 , 1 A 9 security improvements made with AED deployment, first aid oxygen stations, and four wheel drive ambulance carl. Wilson Miller is also assisting with priorities related to the environment. Mr. Hoppeosteadt and Ms. Bellone are assisting with technology upgrades. New Foundation membership canis are available at the Commons and mandatory to use facilities after January 1,2010. Mr. Bob Uek is assisting with levelso{service and funding and Pelican Bay is in excellent shape. Redevelopment feasibility assessment is being done to ensure Pelican Bay is keeping up with standards. There are programs galore and snggested getting involved. The Pelican Bay Post and FOImdation website has program information. The Pelican Bay Services Division has the meeting schedule and minutes. The web address is http://pelicanhayservicesdivisiolLnet. She thanked Ms. Resnick and Ms. McCaughtry for updating and upgrading the Services Division new website. It is a work in progress but coming along nicely. Mr. Moffatt asked if they were in process of doing an updated replacement reserve study because he did not believe that needed to be done. Madam Chair Womble said no, the reserves are jost fine. NOTICE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Madam Chair Womble announced upcoming meetings. On December 9 at 10 o'clock, the Wilson Miller Conununity Improvemeuts Planning Team will present the latest data report. On December 21, there is a joint Services Division and Strategic Planning Committee joint workshop at 2 o'clock. On January 6, 2010, I p. m. there is a Services Division Board meeting. The Wilson Miller Community Improvements Planning Team win present an update at Services Division Board meetings regularly, at I p.m. of the first Wednesday of each month. On January 11,2010, there will be an Educational Meeting to the Comnnmity for residents. There isa 2 p.m. - 4 p.m. session and 7 p.m. - 9 p.m. session. January 26,2010, there is a 9O"Ai Design Re.7eft'joint workshop at 2 p.rn - 4 p.rn She advised the audience to check the Services Division's website for future meeting scheduIe. Mr. Cravens said he would like to bring to attention an article in the Pelican Bay Post's most recent issue entitled, "Services Division Advisory." Historically, this title is used fur Services Division material that appears in the Pelican Bay Post. This article states a Pelican Bay Services Division candidate forum is going to be held by Pelican Bay Property Owners Association (pBPOA) on January 19, 2010 at 7 p.rn - 9 p.m. It announces that there are two residential vacancies doe to Mr. Grnvenborst's resignation and Mr. Molfutt's term expiring. They plan to have candidates appear at this forum Part of lhe problem with this article is thai it is written by Pat Bush and Slau Farb, PBPOA members however, they are identified at top of article as Services Division Board members. Madam Chair Womble said thank you 10 Mr. Crnvens and she has contacted David Trecker 10 resolve. 8260 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minntes December 2, 2009 16 , 1 A 9 ~ Mr. Levy said il is a good article because it tries to get others interested in the two positions. Mr. Cravens announced there are forthcoming vacancies on the Selvices Division Board if interested. Madam Cbair Womble added there are four vacancies: two residential and two commercial. She agreed with Mr. Cravens that the article is a very good solicitation for new members. The Board needs new members 10 be appointed in March 2010. She reiterated that thecandidatc forum is January 19.2010 at 7 p.rn. - 9 p.rn. and there will be refreshments following. She encouraged participation by the audience and the Board members. There is an election if there are more people running than there are seats. If that does occur. the votes are counted, and the Board of County Commissioners review results, and actually determines who is appointed. Mr. Levy said the Commissioners always follow the recommendations. Madam Cbair Womble said not always. Mr. Cravens said what Mr. Levy is saying is whenever there has been an election, the Board of County Commissioners have always deferred to the will of the community of who will fill the seats. Madam Cbair Womble said in any case, they need two residential positions filled and said to Mr. Moffatt that she does hope he reapplies because the Board needs his expertise. Mrs. Cravens asked if Selvices Division Board applications received could be posted on the Services Division website for review by the community. Madam Cbair Womble said yes. Mr. Cravens added it would be helpful if the Foundation sent the information around via email blast Madam Cbair Womble said again that in any case, the candidate Corum is January 19 at 7 p.m., probably in this room. Mr. Cravens said the application deadline is Janulll)' 4. 2010. Madam Cbair Womble said the Commissioner's webpage has the application available. Mr. Levy said the Pelican Bay Post article directs interested candidates to the Services Division's office. Madam Cbair Womble said she appreciates the PBPOA's recruitment effort. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT NORTH TRAM STATION PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ISSUES UPDATE Mr. Dorrill invited the community Sherifi's office liaison, Cannine Marcino to today's meeting to discuss the North Tram Station and Pelican Bay community pedestrian safety issues. however. Mr. Marcino was dispatched to an event, so he arrived late. Upon arrival, Mr. Daffill announced Mr. Man:ino and his pm1ner David Krantz of the Collier 8261 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 1611 A9 po. County Sheriff's office. He briefly explained that the community has embarked on a master planning process. The uumber one priority currently is to improve pedestrian safety measures at the North Trnm Station crosswalk area. They hav" some ideas far tempornIJ' signage stating "Stop for Pedestrians in Crosswalk" in the middle of the roadway or whatever action is appropriate. Mr. Mareino and Mr. Krantz are here today to discuss community concerns, what enforcement and safety measures are in place. Mr. Mareino said he and his partner David Krantz of the Collier County Sheriff's office have been working vigorously to deal with complaints at the North Trnm Station crosswalk. They have condncted numerous traffic details. They have observed speeds this week as high as 38 MPH, which is less than other areas, so sometimes perception is not necessarily the reality. They would like to see better visibility. When drivers come around the angle at a turn, the approach is immediate. Safety is their number one concern. They are blessed to have SheriffRambosk because he is all about the community and facilitating their needs. He urged anyone to call him with complaints. They want to address complaints and he will go to the areas with the person that calls with a oomplaim, so it can be addressed. They will work together with the Services Division, the Foundation and the County to come up with a long-tenn solution. Temporary solutions are traffic details, educating people aboul the enforcemenl actions they can take it they have 100, bnt safety is their number one concern. Madam Chair Womble introduced Mr. Marcino to Mr. Mangan who Mr. Marcino should also inform of any ideas thai he has. Mr. Mareino said he has bad a great worldng relationship for a long time with the Services Division and Foundation. He complimented both on being proactive His partner, David Krantz wOlked for the Florida Highway Patrol as a trnffic and homicide investigator, prior ta coming to wod< for the Collier County Sheriff's office, and traffic is his specialty. Together they have a wealth of knowledge that they can harness to address the issues proactively. Mr. Dorrill shared Mr. Gibson's photo of the "Stop for Pedestrians in Crosswalk placed in the middle of the road with Mr. Mareino. Mr. Gibson said the signage is cheap and quick and a temJlOrnty solution until the master plan is in place. Mr. Mareino said absolutely and offered his and Mr. Krantz' services. They are available anytime to meet and are eager to work with the community. Madam Chair Womble asked the officers if they bad any additional suggestions to the signage. Mr. Krantz said when they are in the field running radar, he has seen other communities that have reflective lighting in the roadway, something that brings to drivers' attention that they are approaching something. Signage cannot 8262 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Snmmary Minutes December 2, 2009 16 f 1 A 9 ,..", be seen by the North Tram Station when coming from the north, so anything that can bring attention and educate people, whether it be the officers or a decoy vehicle, signs in the road are a good idea. Sttipes cannot really be seen until a driver is right up on them. Madam Chair Womble said there are two lanes going north, two lanes going south. Can a sign be placed in the middle of the two lanes on both northbound and southbound sides. Mr. Krantz said he did not know how far prior they plan to place the signs before the crosswalk. Regardless, the cars will have to slow down and probably be lJit and need to be replaced often. They should be placed where they will not change traffic patterns or cause harm to vehicles. Mr. Gibson said the Naples Beach and Golf Club area is more congested than Pelican Bay Boulevard. Mr. Marcino said they can work together immediately with the Services Divisioll, Wilson Miller and the Foundation to achieve common goals. Madam Chair Womble said she likes the word immediately. Mr. Marcino stressed that they are ready 10 tackle the safety issues now, as soon as possible. Mr. Gibson said 10 Mr. Marcino thaI he has a friend who walks their dog severn! times daily near the North Tram Station. His friend said that people use Pelican Bay Boulevard early in the morning and Iale in the evening as an "escape roule" to gel 10 their destination and Mr. Gibson SUggesled they perfonn their traffic patrol at 8 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. ~ 5 p.m. Mr. Marcino said they documenl their traffic details. If they slop someone, whether they give a verbal warning, or documented citatioll, all activity is logged. There bave 001 been any violations recently and he is happy to say that. He again stressed they are ready to start immediately and tackle the problem. Mr. Dallas asked if residents or non-residents are being cited. Mr. Marcino said there are service people, there are many difrerenl types of residents, bul il does nOI matter to them. They are interested in educating people inlO compliance for safety purposes. Mr. Da1Ias asked about bicycles being involved in any incidents. Mr. Marcino said there was a bicyclist involved in an altercation. They stopped the entire group, educaled them into compliance. They are providing Iilerature 10 local bike stores 10 distribute 10 new and seasoned bikers. They are gaining compliance through education or citations, whatever works 10 make people safe. 8263 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 1611 A9 ... Mr. Cravens suggested !bat Mr. Marcino observe Gulf PaIk Drive and Pelican Bay Boulevard any weekday morning 7: 15 a.m. - 7:45 a.m. There is a large pack of bicyclists thaI fail to stop. He said attempts to educate these people have had no effect. Mr. Marcino said complaints do come lhrougb. They can aJlempt to educate people, but if education fails then they issue citations. Bicyclists must endure the same rules and regulations as motor vehicles. Their ultin13te goal is compliance. He will look into !bat area. Ms. Bellone said the bicyclist pack sends out a leader, a block or two ahead looking for traffic patrols. They have walkie-talkies in band to signal back to the rest of the pack. Mr. Marcino said they bave seen !bat happen and the way they address is to have an unmarl<ed vehicle sit at Gulf Park Drive and Pelican Bay Boulevard. The officer inside observes the violation and marked patrol cars ahead will cite them. They comply when they see marl<ed cars. Mr. Bob Naegele asked if they could inslall a flashing yellow light, like as the one at the entrance to Bay Colony Beach Chili, as a temporary interim solution, rather than instill a $45,000 crosswalk. Mr. Gibson said the tlashing lights in the ground are more effective, but he is suggesting something !bat can be installed vel)' quickly, "as soon as next Monday." Lighting is a great solution bullet the experts come up with something. Mr. Naegele said car-<:arrielS park along Pelican Bay Boulevard creating dangerous conditions. The drivelS are disrespectful. The officers need to take a stand and enforce violations or let it go. If there is an accident, it is a liability to the County aud goes upstream to the Foundation. Mr. Marcino said they bave received complaints in the past of trucks loading and unloading, but not recently. He offered his telephone nwnber (239-793-9526) at the Sberiff's office to call with complaints. He also offered residents join them when they conduct traffic details. Perception is DOl necessarily reality. He will ask participants how fast a car is going and the guess is usually mnch higher than what is canghl on the radar, i.e., perception is 52 MPH, reality is 36 MPH. It puts things into perspective. A resident of Pebble Creek said he does not recall this Board objecting to installation and dollars spent on the Myra Janco Daniels $45,000 crosswalk. Il is a tin: more dangerous area and was ahnost hit five times the other day. He said !bat he has never seen the lights go on at the crosswalk. Mr. Levy said the crosswalk is intended for uight use. 8264 Pelican Bay Senices Division Board Regular Session Snmmary Minutes December 2, 2009 16 , 1 A 9 . Madam Chair Womble agreed it is for night use, and it was much worse before the lights were installed. There are as many as three hundred people walking across Bridge Way it to get to the Phil. Mr. Gibson said there are many crosswalk areas in need of attention, but too many lights and it will "start to look like Las Vegas." He is not saying that ligbtsare wrong, but !bey need an interim ine"'JlCnsive solution, and a long- term solution that is attractive and pleasant to the neighborhood. Madam Chair Womble said Mr. Mangan is on it. Mr. Moffatt said several mornings a week at 7:45 am. - 8 a.m. the trnffic backs up to Pelican Bay Boulevard at the entrance to Bay Colony and is a safety issue. Mr. Marcino said he has dealt ..ith this issue with Carlos, the access manager of Bay Colony in the past. Cars line up because they do not allow access until 7:30 a.m. In the past, they rerouted cars to park at AJbertsons until it is time. He said they do not have issues in Bay Colony. It is vel)' secure and !bey run a tight ship. He thanked cvetyone and the presentation concluded. Mr. Cravens requested a motion be made that the BoanI direct Mr. Lukasz to investigllte installation of crosswalk signs at the North Tram Station, such as are shown in the phutograph distributed by Mr. Gibson. Madam Chair said she is not sure they can say implement, but Mr. Lukasz can ceItainly investigate and report at the ne.u meeting. Mr. Gibson said Mr. Lukasz could investigate and recommend an immediate solution. Madam Chair Womble said the BoanI does nut need a motion. They can direct staff to look into what would is possible qnickly. Mr. Cravens added Mr. Lukasz could then report his findings at the next meeting. Mr. Levy said who would pick up the signs when they are knocked down. Mr. Cravens said the BoanI designates Mr. Levy the "official picker-uplJef." Mr. Dallas said he lived in a place where the signs would be knocked down all the time. It was in front of a resort and one would think drivelS would slow doW/l. Mr. Levy said an employee should be neaIby to pick up the signs when they are knocked down. Mr. Cravens' concern is the Board talks about adfressing issues for months, but never takes action. Madam Chair Womble said they did address by installing signage, but it did nut work vel)' well. Mr. Levy said the Foundation also moved the driveway to the north padting lot, a step in the right direction. Mr. Gibson said they could use a cone to hold the signs. 8265 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 1611 A9 Mr. Levy said the cones would also be knocked down. Mr. Gibson agreed and asked Mr. Levy 10 come up with a better solutioo. Mr. Le'T said to Mr. Gibson that he R'BS 1WI SlfJ'ing it "715 1WI a good idea, just another bazard. Mr. Dallas said be does not mind implementing cones and signs, but to know in a prnctical sense they are going to be knocked down frequently. Mr. Moffu.tt suggested tbere be a sign for the next pedestrian to pick lip the sign. Mr. Levy said the signs be would like to see the "Pedestrians have the Rigbt of Way" signs replaced by the "Florida State Law Stop for Pedestrians in Crosswalk" signs along the side of the roadway. not within the crosswalk. He believes they would be more effective. Mr. Lukasz said there are Florida State Law Stop for Pedestrians in Crosswalk signs rigbt before the crosswalk . Madam Chair Womble said between Mr. Dorrill and Mr. Perry, they will help to implement the solution. Mr. Moffatt said be would like to amend Board direction and rather than report back at the next meeting, get it done by the next meeting. Madam Chair Womble said as soon as possible would be great There was no further discussion. CAPITAL PROJECTS There was no diSCllSSion. COMMUNITY ISSUES Madam Chair Womble said at the prior meeting, the Board had asked Mr. Tim Hall 10 look into wbo is responsible for removal of invasive plants by the roadwa}' of the Ritz Carlton. Mr. Hall did not recall the direction. From llis understanding and be looked into it before, the County's Transportation department is ultimately responsible. Madam Chair Womble said there were some complaints and asked Mr. Hall ifbe would like to take care of it, or should Kyle contact the Trnnsportatioo dq-lluent. Mr. Hall said lie would cooIdinate witll Kyle. He does not believe there is anytlling that requires additional permitting, just mainlenance. He said the Board did direct him 10 develop a revised water quality collection protocol and it may be available to distribute 10 the Board at the next meeting in Jauwuy. There was no further discussion. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND I OR REOUESTS 8266 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 1611 A9 There was no discussion. ~ I OLD BUSINESS There was no discussion. NEW BUSINESS FERTILIZER ORDER AND UTILIZATION TRACKING SYSTEM DISCUSSION IT. CRAVENS) Mr. Cravens said he distributed a copy of the South West Florida Regional Planning Council's fertilizer resolution. He said Mr. Lukasz stays apprised ofbest managemenl prnctices and implements accordingly. It is hard to do. Best managemenl practices are ways of applying fertili= using appropriate landscaping, using water correctly, that result in a minimal amount of 0""" fertilization, O'<el' watering, and so on. Severn! years ago. the Board suggested the field employees undergo best management practices training. This was done, but there is a problem. The course takes a day, they take an exam, they pass the exam, and they go back into the field and do not change their behavior. He bighlighted areas he believes are important No fertili= containing nitrogen or phosphorus be applied during the rainy season and asked Mr. Lukasz if the Services Division is in compliance. Mr. Lukasz said yes, for the turf applications and spots where there are problems. They do not apply fertilizer from June through September. Mr. Cravens said the spike of nitrogen occurs during the rainy season. It is not just what the Services Division is doing, it is aJso what the homeowners associations are doing. The Services Division could be in complete compliance.. although he said the Services Division is uot, and still have a problem blx:ause of non-compliance by homeowners associations. He suggested they educate the associations of the proper protocol. There is aJso a problem with fertilizer application. It is supposed to only be applied to the affected areas, i.e., if applying to tmf, it sbou1d only go on the tmf. it should not go on impervious surfaces. Pathways are made of asphalt, cwbs along the roadways adjacenllo the pathways and medians are impervious surfaces. When fertili= gets on impervious surfaces, i.e., if four or five inches is applied along the pathways and roadway medians, application does oot measure up to best management prnctices and is noncompliant. Fertilizer is wasted, doUars are wasted, and the excess fertilizer is washed in the waler management system and Clam Bay, causing problems. He would like 10 fix this and said be understands Mr. Lukasz is aware of the problem, but not sure how he can resolve. He said aJthough his condominium says they perform best management practices, it is nol applied in the field. He urged the Boord to educate themselves by reading the document to find out 8267 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes December 2, 2009 16 f 1 A9 "''''1 best management practices because it will allow them to be bener stewards of this community. He does not believe any action needs to be taken at this time. Mr. Dallas asked Mr. Dorrill if this subject was one that they should be educating the community about considering they are responsible of tbe water management system. Mr. Dorrill said the resolution describes blended fertilizer as a recommended course of action and asked if Mr. Cravens can clarify. Mr. Cravens said from wllat he IUlderstood, the County provides all fertilizer in large plastic bags. They are labeled with the contents. Mr. Lukasz said they buy through a County bid. They come by the palette in 50-pound clear plastic bags. Mr. Cravens said he assumes the County protocol for obtaining bids lakes in to consideration recommendations made by Southwest Florida Water Management District and other agencies. Mr. Lukasz said there are multiple blends and the Services Division purchases the blend that falls within the guidelines for best management practices. Mr. CllIvens said good, theJ. do comply Mr. Lukasz said there are blends that do not comply to best management prnetices, however, they purchase the type in compliance. Mr. CllIvens said maybe they can address Mr. Dallas' comment regarding educating the community later. Mr. Seidel said he believes the City of Naples or the County requires worlrers who deal with landscaping be certified. Mr. Cravens said the Cily of Naples, not the County, passed an ordinance requiring all commercial landscape companies undergo best management prncIires and have certification. They even had bumper stickers issued to the rear bumpers of all vehicles of the company. This allowed those responsible for enforcement to identify offenders. Ms. Noreen Murray said the Florida Extension office bas a "Yards and Neighbors" educational program. Madam Chair Womble said they could contact the Extension office to find out what educational program they offer and discuss on a future agenda. The period of most concern is June I to September 30, so maybe they can target an educational presen1ation closer to that time and do some madreting to promote il. Mr. Cravens concluded his presentation. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE There was no discussion. 8268 Pelican Bay Services Division Board RegoIar Session Snmmary Minntes December 2, 2009 16 rIA 9 ~ j ONGOING PROJECTS STATUS SHEET There was no discussion. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mrs. Cravens referring to the fertilizer resolution discussion said nitrogen and phosphorus spikes occur TI\lce a year. Once in December and April for nilr.ltes in particular and yearly reports show it occurs at the time fertilizer is applied. They re-occur at two sites.. PO 13 and San Lucia, the testing sites. She suggested Mr. Hall and Mr. Lukasz determine what may be causing the spike and address it, I3lber than monitoring and reporting on it. It has been recommended they investigate this every year, bnt it never is addressed. Mr. Hall said he has discussed this with Mr. Lukasz before. Oue must realize that Pelican Bay SeIVices Division is nO/ in charge of /be majority of fertilizer application within Pelican Bay. Each association has their OWII company doing their OWII thing. It is outside of the scope of anything they have been able to do to get all of those companies on the same page. Madam Chair Womble said there is a different landscape at each house north of the Philharmonic. Mr. Levy asked if the Foundation has any say regarding this. Mr. Hall said he belie>es the}' did look at tbat.. IUId he did not recall the Foundation having any restrictions or protocol in place. He believes /bey could impose restrictions. but he is not sure how they could enforce it. Madam Chair Womble said Mr. Levy's suggestion is a good oue and she would con1act Mr. Naegele. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Cravens made a motion to adjourn. Mr. Gibson seconded. The Board voted unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 1: 1\1 PM. Mr. Cravens nuuJe a motion to adjOllm. Mr. Gibson sectJllded. The Board voted unanimously to adjourn the mee/i,,,, al3:10 PM. Minutes by Lisa Resnick 11/30/200911:39:45 AM 8269 16 I 1 F,A 9~ J Halas ,_~ PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION ADVISORY BOARD AND PELICAN BA YIIlo~~-v' STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE JOINTWORKSIIOP SUMMARY ~E" 1)_ WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2009 Coletta -;j 0'( n LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Pelican Bay Seniee1l Division Advisory Board and the Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee conducted a Joint hbIic Wotbhop, Wedne.....y. Dn:emher 9. 2009, 10 o'clock in the morning at tbe C_munity Center at PeIi<an Bay, 8960 lIammock Oak Drive, Napks The ")Bowing mcmbt..'Ts were present: Community Improvement PIau Update Prnentatioo by: Kevin Mangan, Principal & Landscape Architoct, Wilson Miller Steve Sanunons, Sr. Associate and LandiCapc Architect, Wilson Milfa- JeffPcrry, Sf ProJCCl Manager, Transp<l1ation Planning, Wilson Miller absent RECEIVED. FEB 1 9 2010 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board Membe.. Ooard of Coon\\, CQnwq_.. Mary Arme Wombk, Chairwoman K,:ith Dallas, Vice Chairman absenJ' John lai7Lo Tom Cravens absent Michael Levy GCtJtTn.-y (iihson absent Gerald Moffatt Hunter Hansen absem Theodore Raia Jill Kohe absenJ Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Plaunin!!: Committee Members Bob Uek, Chainnan Rose Mary E vCTell ab.Yelll Merlin l.ickhaltcr, Co-Vice Chair Noreen MlDTIIY absent Ralph Ohkrs Carson l3eaillc absent Ronllle l3ellooe, C(}- Vicc ChaIr absent Mary Anne Wom"'e Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Neil Dorrill, Administrator absent K yk I.ukasz, Ficld Ope....tioos Manager Mary McCaughtry, Recording Secretary Lisa Resnick, Administrative Assistant Pelican Bay Foundation Staff Jim Hopp<'Tlstead~ President Suzanne Minadcx), Executive Assistant WILSON MILLER COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLANNING TEAM PRESENfATION OF TIlE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN PHASE ONE 100% BASE DATA REPORT Mr. Kevin Mangan introduced the Coounumty Improvement Plan Phase One 100"10 Base Data Report. He wi 11 engage questions and comments at the time of prCsentati(Il Madam ChaIr Womble asked if they have determmed an lDlIIIedIate Ii" t(>r the Nor1h Tram Stat.oo crosswalk Mr. Mangan said he and Mr. Lukasz have been working with the COWlty to determine permit requiremmts ('lr temporary signage and with contractors I,.. prIcing Onee they determine teclmical and kgal details, the challenge will be how to hring better visibility to the U'(JSo..;;tng area, as well a...,: conform to the commWlity 's aesthetic standard. Any fiashing lighting improvements would be supplemental to the ultimate solutim. not a l<'ITlp<W'ary ""lution. They should have enough feedback by tomorrow and can fTOvlde an update at that hme by ematl. The planning team has not found any limiting or noncompliance is.')l!eS that would delay the planning process from moving f(>rward Based on eonvcrsatims WIth Turrell Hall & Associates and the County, both made recommendations to avoid improvements to areas that are adjacent to associations., eSpl-'Cially wht.'Tl the improvements are relative to environmental permitting. A possible exception would be an overriding cin;tM\~;_h a."i a safety or 44 ".,--_.~-- Item # 16 I 1 A 9 ":'1 Pelican Bay Service. Divi.ion Advisory Board & Pelkan Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Joint Workshop Summary Minute. December 9, 2009 security issue, but none at this point. 'lbe community covenants Me challenging to some of their designs in tenus of maink.--nance and operational issues on private land o\Woo by the Foundatioo and scmc associations. For example, the Foundatitm covenants dictate hlXlgcs cannot be higher than six foci; however, in some areas it is apITopriate for hlXlges to be higher than six feet. They will be discussing lUrther With Lisa Warrm, Foundation Cove'TIant ManageT 'ill how to proceed With those types of ISsues They are rccordmg the dcslgn-limllmg IacI,l[S, mc\OOmg \he locatIon and applIcable standard(s), i.e., there arc indiVIdual a~iation covenants.. Foundation covenants, or County Land Development Code regulation. The locll' today is on land'lCaping in roadways. The first maJ'X task to tackle is streetscapc plans for landscape and irrigation. Landscaping improvt..'fDertt'i will touch on every project because associatt.-d with many areas of community concern. Landscaping unprovcmcnts in the roadway medians :tJou~d maintain plant heights compatIble \\lith driver visibility and pedestrian safety. Overgrowth alsoC8.uses safety and S(X,'urity coorems in parks and other common areas blocking visibility and lighting from the roadways and pathways. ConSIderation should also be gIven aeslhetie and inle,.est conside'fOtions. The larger matenal should su-ve as a backdrop and layerlXl with smallcr material. Even the County is making better landscapmg chOIceS. Th~'Y should mCOlpOfate better management practices by eliminating sod in the right of way, as well as relocate or remove plant matenal In l:thcr areas. Ehminatmg sod win lower mamtenance and irrigation rcquinmcnls. The)' supporl best m.magemenl ~aclices for fertilizer utilizatioo, such as Southwe'Sl Florida Regional Planning COllilcil Fertilizatirn. f{.'solut.itTl discussed at a recent Services Division meeting. Thcy want to Implement commonality of use of plant material, as well a, add color, but keep it wnfonn. Mr. Mofl.(( asklXl Mr Mangan to clarify whether the area referred to for the park setting enhaneeme'TIt is a designated park. Mr. Mangan said the areas <D'"C open spaces in the community, and not otllciaJly deSIgnated as parks, i.e., not Ridgewood Park. These open spa"'-'" ITovlde an opportumty to employ the same type'S of im~oveme'llts that they would rlXommend for a real park. Mr. Lickhalter said some of the items refer to coordination with homeo\\<ner a'i'l(lCiatiOlls and from his understanding, applies to where a public right of way interfaces with association pr-opcrty and asked Mr. Mangan to clanfy. Mr. Mangan said the~operty line delineation is the public nght of way, or County land, with the association on the other side. Legal property lines are ex~remely Important, but land=ping merges and blend, across those lines They 45 1611 A9 Pelican Bay Services Division Advioory Board & PelielUl Bay Foundation Strate,;e Planning Committee Joint Workshop Summary Minutes December 9, 2009 ''"' will work with associatim1:i bccall.'ie there arc arca:i in the connnunity wht-.....c the iegallinc should not necessarily delineate whether the landscaping begms, ends, or blend& Mr. I .ickhaltcr- referred to Improvements recommended in public right of way locations. He stated an association on the other side of the 1'-1;al property line does not have a say in the deeislm making process, but regardless, they may ohject to an im,rovclIlcnt rccommcrulcd by the l->ctican Bay &>rviccs IJivlSlon. Mr. Mangan said yes. and it \I\oiJl be a chalknge to tackle the task, but the tx..>;St solution will be the most attractive onc for the commwnty Mr. Moffatt referred to Mr. Mangan's comments annut plant n..moval and asked if the)' would remove trees in order to widen the pathways. Mr. Mangan said they recogmzc the conflIcts WIth the pathways and the landscape. Should a tree not have proper f{x)m to grow, being too close to the road, or tooc\ose to the path, ill health is reasons to removc. 'Ibis is not the case for all the trees in the pathways because in oome case,;. they might suggest relocating the pathway Th~'Y will recommend solutioos based on the scx...nario. ML Moffatt said the roots of an oak tree cru,~ed the feedt,'f line loc me of the fire hydranl' in his neighborhood and it took Jour or live days to dig out roots alone. The fire department IS going to recommend to his as.'lociation that they remove all oak trees near feeder hnes hecau.<;e the tra..~ will destroy the lincscvcntually. ML Iloppensteadt said the nd ''Ystem will dt.'Strov a golf C(Q"se grems, cart paths, and tee areas, Dr. Ted Raia said regarding safety is."Jes and line of sight suggested they draw to ,.;ale recommended lines of sight that plant height cannot exeeed what the department of transportatim recommend, as maximwn and identify what the safety issue is, where and who owns the property, and the kinds of plants for replact-mcnt. Mr. Mangan said tra1llc-calming studIes address hne of sight satcty is-'lUCs_ Dr. Raia said to include driveways of 3SSO<..1ahons. Mr. Mangan said fiJf example, the Commons illivcway has i~-s that lIlt_1' are addres.<.;ing. The application of a department oftransYX)J1ati(Il sight line to sumenle travelling in the roadway IS going to be difTt..''fl_''tlt from driveway and curb cuts_ ^ single standanl should apply to df1veway~ but mo:-.-t m-ivL'Ways and associated land'icapc conditions arc on pnvate property, however they WIll be addr""""'g the drwe",ays m the puhlic nght of way, They developed a list of recommended and appropriate landscape matena\' 46 16 r 1 A9 ,~ Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foondation Strategic Planning Committee Joint Workshop Summary Minutes December 9, 2009 Dr. Rata asktxl aoaut irrigatIon. Mr. Mangan said regarding irri~ioo the most LiT<..--ctive work they can do is nxommcnd a ht..~tter way to deliver water and reduce walL.,. consumption by moving to miao irrigati(Il rather than a br-oadcast inigatioo. 'fhey recommend not to water property d...ing the day The")' 10'*00 at how ditTerent plant material chol"'-':; may provide bette'f wale'f delivery and less water consumption, l.e., remove sod fnxn areas aloog medians (ID Pehcan Bay Boulevard alone, or 2.5 acres of land, and dehv('T micro irrigation will fulfill that goal Dr. Raia said the Pelican Bay wau..:f management ~1'stem pnxhcates on the fact that there shall be no increase in disebarge of wate..- into Clam Bay between pre and post dc\e1opment Assummg that is accompli:4lOO, the)' bring in millions of galloos of water fix- rrrigation. Pervious I and should ahsorb any excess water however, that is not the case Excess waler nol absorbed by the perviolls land llows into Clam Bay. He suggt..~ they look mto improving the water management syst<..w to capture and absorb irrigatt..-d watec. He also sugge:->1ed thq develop a better :-,"y~1(..m 10 prcvL"I11 cars from dri\.ing ov(..."T and destroying SJTinklcr hcad"i. Exf.."\:.~" irrigatioo wak.,- draining into Clam Bay may he caLL')ing problems and sugg",,'\OO they address Mr. lloppensteadt askOO if thc nmolT goes into thc water retaming lakcs and only rclea'<Cd at a certain leveL Mr L ukasz sHld durin~ the dry periods the execs.... nmot\' that goes into the streets does go through the water managcrru.,,--nt ''''J'stt.'1ll, but there IS mae impt.'111IDuS land and nben the excess nmotf reaches a controlled elevation it may not !lush through the system and can reach Clam Bay Chairwoman Womble said they chose WilS<1Il Mille.- because Wilson Miller understands Pelican Hay's wate..- management system Mr Mangan made lighting recommendations to provllle more light, redistribute. and conserve energy consumpti(ID. 'lb<..}' want to lL'iC what IS already there and make it betta. For t.."Xarnple, replacing the current fixture to a LED I.xt...e proVides benefits by reducing energy usage 30 %. Lighting t(lf ae'slheties, ic, at the entrances, can highlight landscape features, different poles ".. aesthetics, as well as rcloeatiOll or rOOistributJOIl t(>f hL'Ite.- funL'\imalIty; some plant growth is blocking light LIghting allccts signage and many areas such as crosswalks. Ms. Cora Obley askOO ..nat the life expectancy of a metal pole is. Mr. Mangan ~Hd there are several types of metal, hli the fOCus IS on sustammg fix next 20 years. Mr_ Levy said existing (X)lcs are only seven years old 47 16 r 1 A9 , Peliean Bay Services Division Advisory Board & PeIicaJo Bay Foundation Strategic: Planning Committee Joint Worksbop Summary Minutes December 9, 2009 Mr_ Mangan said they arc looking at what they can do to make the concrete poles aesthetically pleasing One third of the lighting has landscape blockage. Mr. Lickhallcr said on page 12, south side, it does nollook like tht:re are streetlights on Crayt(>>l Road, Myra Janco Daniels Houlcvard, and Rldgt:wood Drive. Mr. Mangan said from his l.llldcrstandmg those areas are not a part of the scope of study Mr Levy said !hose loealions should be inehKlctl t=au."C \hc~ are part ,)(' PelIcan Ba~ Mr. Liekhailcr said !hat is his mIstake for m~ mcludmg and suggeslcrl the Boord and Commillee r<=llSldc'f. Is !here not some pa!hway lighting m ar""" across Hammock Oak, should that be part of this scope" He made a motion to modify the scope of servtces to ioelude!he three publie roads, Crayton Road, Myra Janco Daniels Boulevard, and Rldgewood Dnve, the south side ot" Vandel-bIlt beach road ()fl County prop<...Ity under Pelican Bay SL"fVICCS Di vision purview, and pathway lighting in Foundation parks Mr Moffatt SCCtmdcrlthc ml~ioo. ChailWoman Womble said the Service) Division did not have a quorum. Mr. Mangan saId based on the thought pr(xx-'sses to date, they could add those areas at the schematic design level now Mr. Liekhaltcr suggestcrl Mr ~klp(1t.'Ilslcadtlo get a proposal !Tom Wilson Milk'f for a change OrdL'T to determine cost of adding to the SC<lpC and when appropriate the respective orgaruzatirns can take aclIon. Mr_ Uck said Foundation has a meeting next week and possibility to take a vote Dr. Raia said Mr. Lickhaltcr could mn~nd the motion as a rccommendalion 10 study and executc. Mr. Hoppcnstcadt said if thl."Y amt..-nde.d the ffil..'ilion to include a request for a proposal and change order from Wilson Millt...T fOr con:'iideratlOn and approval by the Pehcan Bay ServIces DP.'1Sl00 and FOWldatKIl Strategic Planning Committee. Mr. Uek olTercrlto take blmne with Mr. L1ckhalte> fOr missing the locations. Mr I loppensteadl quencrl the Strategic Plmming Committee and all votctl In favor (~'tl1c moll", Due to lackoI' quorum, the Pelican !lay Sc"fViccs Divlsion fl<..rddid not v<~eand thIS .tem will brought back to lx)th the Board and Strategic Plarmmg Conumttee for COIlSIdcration at subsequent meeting 48 1.611 A9 .... Pelican Bay Services Division AdvillOl')' BoanI & Pelican Bay Foundation Stratexic P1l111niDJt Committee Joint Workshop Summary Minutes December 9, 2(J(J9 Mr. LkkJralJer made a -mon to lW'ommnuJ ~ to tlte scope of ~rvkes. Modijieations incluJe adding a4diIimwI'.........-s aImtg Cmytorr Raad, Myra JIllU:O Daniels Boukvard, and RiJgewood Drive; County property along the south side of Vanderbilt Beach Road; and address pathway lighting ;" F~ parks and request a proposal and change order from IV"""" M'dle for cOllSider..w..11y the ~ Hay Ser.oices DivisWn 8o<ud and Foundation StraJegk l'IiuuWrg CommiJtee.. Due to lad< of quonun, tlte Pe6e1llf Bay Semees Division Board Wi not voIR and this ilem Mill brought back to both tlte Board and Strotegk Planning Conrmittee for consiJkratjon at a sllluLquent meeting. Mr. Hoppen.veadl queried the StrattWc PlanninP Commiltee _d WJte4 UR' to llIJIJI'ove the motion. Mr. Mangan saId regardmg palhway hghtmg that there IS an .ncrnslslenq amongstlocalJons. Adequate hghtmg should he in many moce loeatims. There are a tew hundru.! hght bulbs m the eOlllIIlunlty they rC'Ullllmcnd upgradmg to LED fixturc", and bulbs. There may also he rossoble ditfen:nt designs and other issues with poles Mr. Mangan discu.'i.<nl obscrvatioos made regarding sound and security aloog the U.S_ 41 bt...'"ITIl. From his obst.'fvations, the US 41 berm is lTokrn. They can roccrnmend m<.Jd,f=ti<Jns tQ ,ncrea"", sat<<y and ==ity including kncing, landscapmg, and hghtmg along US 41, With contmwty through communIty entryways along Pehcan Bay Boulevard and Gulf Shoce Drive 'IlK'Y want to make sure the solutions recommended so that when you twn the comer they enk.. the property as well The berm has many element", including landscaping, fencing, walls, and the choice for proper solution should be comm<.m to the entIre berm a.';o well 3..." when roc is twning into the commllllity. Regarding noise pollution, the <Xlmmunity cxpr~~ c.oncan<:; ~t crea.tmg a ''hi.gnway'' of ~und retention walls and he aSSllft...'S tht..'Y do not envision 3..") a rClA:mmendabon. If a ~d wall rcct::mmcndahun comes forth, it would he no higher than eight feet and should he lost in the sWTOunding landscape. Another poSSIble long-tenn solution IS to plac<: speakC'fS in the parks amongst the landscape creating white noise. .tbey will make rccommrndations based on the Crime Prcvrntjon through EnvironnH...'tltal Design (lr ClyrED principles. HIe Sheritrs olTIcc t.'I1d4..Jrscs CPTl:D. Mr. Moffatt asked If Mr. Cannine Mareino of the Colhes County Shent!'s otTlCe (Jf CCSO shared with Wilson Miller the Pehean Bay IDeidcnt rep<xt Mr. Mangan said no, but thq have requested the mformatim fnllll the CCSO He said from his observallOns, lhey may find security holes in locatims not rep<1I1cd in the CCSO repcrt. The CCSO rep<1I1 may show areas that the CommWlity Improvements Planning 'I' earn mis...w, in which case thc)' WIll go back and recheck Tbey observed the ocrms and the height rises and falls from a mimmum of eight feet to maximum of twenty-six teet, whereas the roadway clevatioo docs not change, so in some places there is an eight-foot ditlcrenoc in ek..'"Vation bctwet..'1l the berm and the roadway. In Ridgewood park, olle can stand and watch the tr.dlic, as well as hear It The CCSO report may show 49 ,,16 , 1 A9 .. , Pelican Bay Semces Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic P1anning.Committee Joint Workshop Summary Minutes December 9, 2009 othL'"fwisc, but it appears that the ht.'1TIl SClVL"S its purpose in terms of secwity Once they receive the report, they will he able to hone in and recommend improvements Thcy obS<-'fVed thc pathways by fool and bikc. Th,-"y believe eight feet wide paths would servc thc commumty betk'r than the current fivc feet widtlt EIght feet wide would allow for a better allowance of activitics. Mr Ohk'rs asked If they counted the number 01' pcde&nans, 0< did they JUst makc obscrvallOOS. Mr. Mangan said rceootmendatiOfl based m observatiOfl and go<ld cxperience walking thc arca. Mr. Ohlers said the reasoo. he a:*.ed is bccal.lSC S<.WllC walkways arc more heavily used and he wlmders whether all pathways throughout thc commWlily need to be eight fcct wide, i.c., Pehcan Bay Boulevard has thc mosl activity with walkmg and bikcs to gel 10 the hc'lID. Thccloscr one gets to US 41, morc walkmg, lcss bicycling, less conflict of W..:tivltles. Mr. Mangan said good point There is a ~1Tcct use hit..Tarchy. f Ie prefers to hike in the road, not the pathways. He supported Mr. Ohlers commtnt and the best course of action to improve pathways ",ill initially be to the Houlcvards, and sexxmdarily to the local or side streets. Tht..1' believe the pathways need moce work to improve the transition whc"fC they intcrst."'Ct with the road and cwb lines bcca.lL.'iC of the many diJTt.Tt..'TIt materials. Improving the transitioo areas is more important than widening. Pathway improvemt'nts WlI1 be by prifX"ity on the side strrels IS a Wiser choice. Mr. Lickhalter asked what Mr. Mangan recommends fo< a so!uliOfl for \\beel traffic, i.c., rollcrblading and biking and whcther they should separate actiVltles liun pcdcstr:ians. Mr. Mangan SaId it gctsdiflicult when ooc tries to fmd a space fo< cvery activity by rule becausc il ercates other 1s"UCS. ! Ic is a biker and would be in thc ''Ired, and bclicv~'S they should encoUTage this. They should consider bikc lane'S <m pathways, but separating them by ruleereales other is,'iUCS. Width gIVes actiVIties the opportlmity to coexist, but scparatum could eause flmcl1inaJ d!tliculty bet<lUSC people get mnfuscd about wherc thev arc supposed to go and question \\bcther thc activity. i.c, biking, or rollerNading, IS accepted. Width IS best solUtlffi but hc caU!lOns agamst making an overall statemmt regarding separatioo of activities. Mr. Lcvy referred to Mr Mangan's sugg<-",lIon to widm pathways to a mimmwn ofcigh! foct ami askcd ifthc total width would be ten foct widc pathways alOflg PelIcan llay Boulevard. Mr. Mangan sajd one way to Jook at a .'OI.:ll1ution i.. to lvuU:n one sIde l.lt' Pehcan Bay Boulevard to eight or ten k-et wide pa thways., and keep the other side as it IS, or olha varying combinati(IlS-. Ten feet may be too wide tx..'C3USC there is not enough Ira/lie now. Eight fcd widc is a good dimension and allows three people sldc by sidc. 50 1611 A9 ... Pelican Bay Servi"". Divi.ion Advisory Board & Pelic.. Bay F_dation Stl"llfe/:ic Planning Committee Joint Workshop Summary Minutes De""mber 9, 2009 Mr l.evy said in regards 10 wulening Clghl fed. or 1m fed., !bey should consider OOth in their rccommendaoou. Mr. Mangan saId that was a go<xI IX,""t and would CUlsider all possIbllilies Unless Ihae is an exlracnlinary circumstance, he docs nol believe they would recommend widening pathways m,..e than ten fCc!. Current signage on public streets and cnIryways speaks of time and place and rcammc'tldations made should be timeless. Certain improvements by applicahoo. may be great t{T traffic calming and they will approach the county for uniform roadway signage ha."iCd on scenic highway s.ignagc criteria., w\~t thedc'5i.gnatioo, f~Jf exampl,e, of Peham Bay Boulevard, and without LTcating visual clutter. They cannol change some clt.menls such as lDlifonn tratlic c(mtrol devices. Signage and otha improvements can be more aesthetically pleasing howt.."V(..j, as well as scrve a purpose, i.e., traffic calming. Mr. Lickhaltcr askoo alxlUt entry way slgnagc at Scagatc and Myra Janco Daniels HouIcvanl. I lc recalled acknowledging that entrance as mcreasingly important because of Waterside Shops. Mr Lc-vy said thai arca was no! a part of the study Mr. Mangan agreed and said in adlltion to entryways at Seagate and Myra Janco Daniels Boulevard they will review entryways at Oulf Park Drive and Ridgc'Woud Drive Mr 1.lckhaltcr asked If thC')' ~CJUld consldcr crJtryway S1gnage at Hammock Oak Dove. Mr Mangan said yes. 'lhcy arc looking at crooswalks communitywldc, as well as locations whae they do not exist or need improvement. Traffic calming and safely solutions at cr"",,'Walks should med. transpatalJrn department standards as well as provide continUIty and consistency conIDmnitywide. lIe and Mr. Lukasz are reviewing the short term, temporary poss,ibilities and tht.')' want to make SIre the short tenn sohilO11s are done weB and meet tram'-Jlortation standards, and mw,1. be fitting to the C(mmlUlity Mapping Jnn"f sight lincs\\'ill be a part of indivldual intersections studil...."S done in the next pha~ of work. Mr. ()h]ers asked if the Iransportatim dcpartmcnt stand...d allows substituting pavcrs to I<)f striping. Mr Mangan discu;;scd substituting pavas 1<.. striping and the Com ty is open to the idea. Applied well, subs1ituting pavers for striping, although expensivc, is the best solutim. At a crosswalk, pava blocks should be set in mud over top a com, Tete foundatioo creating a ngid whole system from curb line to CLD:"b linc. Mr. Lickhaltcr asked if saId Merlm IS layout. of paving of the "N,(...th Tram station currcrn. Mangan said no. the drawing is not cwrcnt. 1be ultimate I....Tosswalk solution at Ncxth. Tram statioo is to modify the turn lane and remove vegelal1m from the medIan. This will align traffic relationships as they are expected and 51 16 f il A9 PeUcan Bay SeMi..,s Division Advisory Board & PeIica1t Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Joint Workshop Snmmary Minutes De..,mber 9, 2009 dc..-;igned for and open up visibility for a kng way. Currently the visibility is v(.~y poor and he ObsL"fVed the point where the crosswalk hccomes visible by paricing a SheritTDepu.ty-s. vehicle at the LTOSS-Walk. When drivers could see the [^-l'uty's car, which was, more (K less at the curb hne, they would b<ake and start to slow down. They would hke to gel a sense of how much furth..- back recognitim can be. In lL'I1Ils ofvisihihty, pav..-s treated with high visibility color combma\Jons and high mellOn S1.D1'ace or HFS apphcalJon and mstallcd dlft",tly to the asphal~ WlII providc the best cros....walk solution. CommWlity park destinatioo improvement plans :4lOuld have passive and active rccrcatirfl arcas. Recommendations made may requirc a higher level of mamlenance for securIly and safety reasons, i.e, sod, low lying vegetation for visibility purpOSl."S_ Parks are pla~ for SOCIal gatherings and efiDrt made to increase ioh...Jest and people using facilities tOr multiuse purp()~s., roc example, c<mmnnrty photography or pamtmg classes. FlDTIishings and olhl.'T standard elements should be commonly themed 'lbt-1' should eoo,'idt,'f porkmg, nearby communitIes, mutt.ple activItIes, and signage. &'fl11 and boarrlwalk imJTovemmt plans must firS! pass OO'H.'nVlronmmtal permitting r"'luiremcnls, and then considt-'f phasing lffipkmcntatioll llardscapc elements will be part of the solutIOn and mcludes landscaping and pathways. Mr. Moffatt reterred to the list of exot.e nUIsance plants. He said tht-1' d.d not label Mexican PelImia as an exotic or a nuisance plant and asked \\tnat the cla"\.Slficatim is Mr Mangan Said he woold look into classdical!On of Mexican PelWlia and ""port back. In the scht-malle design ph",,,,, tht-'Y arc looking foc Improvements that will JTovidc function. as well as be n'''Pfcsentative of the (X)TIlIDtmity's aesthetics. They wiH be looking into cxi~mg public art ~ogram to coosidcr lX">t{"11.tial and reasonabJe Jocatims commtlUitynrJ(je; new teclmoJogies, such as video survt."illancc {.."quipnent It)]'" st.-"Curity purposes; At 6()O.Io, ideas foc imlIovcmcnt... to mrth tram stalims include additiooallocations for shade and shelter. Reorganization of the C(fllmt:Ils site is right (m target, separating pOOestrjans from aut(xnobilcs, moving tram station from "back of house activities, provide a heightened tini~~ a vchicle drop otT point., st..-parating pt..xlcstrians from delivery services and screening "back hOLL'ie" activities, n:xxganizc f()T better functiooality, circulatioo, and ll.'iC. Preliminary mdicati<ms are that the preserve are'd IS a wd area, so If thall"; confirmed, they 'WIll not dlaHcngc Improvements there or attempt any L'llvinnmcntal permitting. 52 16 , ~ A9 Pelican Bay Service. Divilion Advi~ Board & Peliean Bay F-.IatiGn Stratq;c Planning Committee Joint Worklhop Summary Minutes Decemher 9, 2009 Ibey have bet..--n mere involved with the c.omrnun~ and aTe providing many oppllrtunities to cI.:lInmunicate updates. They wrote an article regarding the ComnuBllty Improvements Plan for an upcoming is.~ of the Pelican Bay Post. ()th~,- opportunities to commun1Cllle include providing a presentation to the Men's CoIlee, additIOnal community site walks. Th~)' are open to suggestions' Mr. Sammons saId Mr, HOPl',:nsteadt suggested tik.)' 1()llow up WIth consultant Dolly Roberts I()r steward assistance. Mr, Mangan agreed and with Ms, Rolx:rts' assistance, the gooJs fCl' advertising in the Sunday paper real estate section. Madam Chair Womble said she still beli~'vt:s they need to put comment cards in the trams because people read them and remember. "Once on the way out to the beach and once on the way Ill.," prOV1<:k..~ reinforcemt.'l1t Mr Mangan said by the end of this wed;, anoIhcr set of amOtlllcern<nts will go out and he agreed to follow through with Madam Chair's suggt:stim to put comment canis on the trams The current phase is the SJIingboard I()]' ideas, and the j()[thcoming schematic dt.'Sign phase willlring IOrth a varidy (f total desIgn soIutlms and the t1nung for impkwcntatioo. lIe asked if anyone had any commrntsor questions. Mr. Ohlers saId what may hclp people VIsualize Im{TovCIIll.'t1ts and ~;;olulions Me to pr~t mt...>dia, i.e., pictures or a video of the roadway and as <Ile moves along It, show the transiti<Il, how the roadway has changed from hO\\' is no\-\' to what it can be after implem<nting the ImpToVt2nent CI' soIutlm. Mr. Mangan agreed Mr ()bIers idea wa'" a bJ()od (me. Their staft'is simulating results for their own reference, and if they can utilize the same technique fCl' the public, they WIll. Mr. V~'k said on Pelican Bay Boulevard medians, there are very tall stately palm trees and asked what the ltfespan or lhe palms arc. Mr. Mangan Said the Sabal palms are the state tree He said the problem is noI the palms' life expectancy, but the large number of them requires a lot ofmaintcnancc and Ih~)' will take S<ITle corrective achm in Ihe medians. The trees in the medians are generally older and in other areas, tht.]1 are youngt-,- and starting to bl()(m. Sabal palms are readily available, some they will relocate and man)' in the medians th\..1' win remove. Mr Vei< SaId stOlle ot'lhe Sabal palms look dJseast.'d and lllIattraclJve. 53 16 '1 A 9 Pdif,lII 8il~ ~cnin's Oh:ision :\thisor~ Bo......d & Pdiran 1141,' Foundatioll Stnu.'gic Planllin~ Cnmmittt.."t. .Joint \\'orksholJ Summar")- Minutes Dccemhcr 9.2009 ......... \11" t\t1ngal1 Stud there an: r)()(J...Ch or areas \\orsc for \\CaL and Ill: llkc~ 10 t1Si.: S:lbal palms. hUllhc IOcll~ alld challen)!e IS on slghl \ISlbllll\ HI Ih(.' road\\;1\ s If Ihl.."\ Gill l"olkcl and rells\.' lhe\ \\ III. ilnd If 110 olher \\(lY (he\ will rCIIIO\e \11' liCk rdcrred 10 i\'1r Mall)!.an 0; (OllllIlCnl abOlIl "IX'clrlcalion" ,1IId ;lddllllHlal ;,;os110 IIlslall f)<1\CrS and llS1Il1l lllud ;lIId concrdc. \ S ;1 sand base \11' i\1ang;1Il Stud Iht:" fauol 1', hcl\\L'('1l 1\\0 - thr('(' tllHe". l1lore Then:: 1\ :idduIOlla! C\.GI\';ilIUIl LInd concrclc cosls ll1me than :-.alld I k lhankl..:d "':\Cr\01l(' !lol JII~I for lod,l\ '" ,-'tforls hill ;dw fill LhL'lI clforh dllno!..: Ill..;' It I',,' of Ihe proJI..'C1 \lr l'\.'k S;lH.J th\.' iW'\1 11l('Cll1\~ l~ tkCl:1lI0\.'1 2\ :llld d\ll: 10 11-..:: hphd;l\s ;lll\.'11danc:..: 111<1\ hI..' sparS(" I k added lllal doL''' fiOI IIlC;lIIlhalIlO olle Glk'S i1k'\ .111...1 h;l\c dlhl'l pliol"llll..'S Mr Mangan s~lId hI..' doc~ lJlldcrs.t<lnd and appn,:cl;lIc" IIII..' COllllllCllh and ;id\II..'1..' lllls l!,nJlIp prO\ Ides I Ie thanked c\cl)onc and concluded lht: I1rl'SCJ1lilllOll ~ I, I...... i.... ......' ""'l~l I ..-/--..' ?/ -//:,/J-I jLj~~"_ 'ULL " t", ""p'_,'_ \'la~;", lIc-\\'olllbl~KIlr.\Olllall ,\-ill:dh", ii. i !,u ;k~njd: 1!.'l/.'IHO 10,06..'(1 AM f,4 16 1 1 A9 --.....'" PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION ADVISORY BOARD AND PELICAN BAY FOUNDA nON STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE JOINT WORKSHOP SUMMARY MINUTES MONDAY, DECEMBER 21,2009 LET IT BE REMEMBERED \hat the Pelican Bay Services Divisiun Advisory Board and tbe Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee conducted a Joint Public Worl<shop on Monday, December 21, 2009 at, 2 o'clock in the afternoon at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive. The following members were present: Community Improvement Plan Update Presentation By Kevin Mangan, Principal & L.nel,.",pe Architect, Wilson Miller Steve Sammons, Sr. Associate and Landscape Architect, Wilson Miller Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board Members Keith Dallas Acting Chairman Mary Anne Womble, Chairwoman absent John laizzo Tom Cravens absent Michael Levy Geoffrey Gibson absent Gerald Moffatt Hunter Hansen absent Theodore Raia Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Members Bob Uek, Chainnan absent Rose Mary Everett Merlin Lickhalter, Co-Vice Chair Noreen Murray Ralph Ohlers Carson Beadle absent Ronnie Bellone, Co-Vice Chair absent Mary Anne Womble absent Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Kyle Lukasz, Field Operations Manager Mary McCaughtry, Recording Secretary Lisa Resnick, Administrative Assistant Pelican Bay FOllDdation Staff Jim Hoppensteadt, President Suzanne Minadeo, Executive Assistant Pelican Bay Foundation Communications Consultant DoUy Roberts COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN PHASE n 45% SCHEMATIC DESIGN PRESENTATION Mr. Kevin Mangan announced the January 11, l() W town ball style jX!ucational community meetings and acknowledged !hey advertised heavily, including billboanls and p1acaIds on !he lrams. He introduced !he Communi/}' Improvement Plan Phase One 100% Base Data Report and reviewed the agenda. Mr. Hoppensteadt introduced the Foundation's Communications Consultant, Dolly Roberts. CROSSWALKS Regarding !he midblock crosswalk at the North tram station, the County's traffic engineers recommended improvements should meet 2010 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices or MUTCD for traffic striping and traffic control devices, i.e., high visibility piano key striping ten feet wide and signage. Wilson Miller's recommendations will incorporate !he 2010 MUTCD standard at the North tram midblock crosswalk and recommend other locations, and bring forward optioual features designed to increase driver awareness of approaching crosswalk, i.e., stop bars for safety recognition. Ms. Murray suggested installing a stop sign at the crosswalk. 55 16'1 A9 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic P1aDDing Committee Joint Workshop Snmmary Minntes December 21, 2009 Mr. Mangan said Florida law prohibits stop signs at midblock crosswalks. They consulted with the transportation department and a stop sign is not pennitted at the North \tam station because it is a midblock crosswalk. Regarding midblock crosswalks and according to MUTCD, traffic most continue Ilo\ving, three signs most be installed, i.e., pedestrian crossing ahead, state law stop for pedestrians in crosswalk, and pedestrian crossing here. The MUTCD detennines the specifications for placement of the signage. Dr. Raia suggested removing the u-torn. Mr. Mangan said during the frrst pllase their recommendation would not include, however a long-term solution would be to remove the u-turn lane to enable a wider and safer pedestrian crosswalk. Ms. Everett suggested moving the crosswalk from the south side to the north side is a better loug-tenn solution. It would be farther from away from the driveways and Pebble Creek resideuts would have to walk a little farther to get Lo the crosswalk. Mr. Mangan said the current location brings pedestrians directly to the North tram station depot "pickup point. " Over the long term, removing the turn lane, in addition to widening the crosswalk, gives pedestrians the shortest distance across the roadway. Future improvements will supplement the standard, i.e., high friction surface and pavers. Immediate improvements should provide consistency with high visibility striping and regulatory signage. The best improvement or total solution for Ibis crosswalk would he to relocate the driveway com cot. Innnediate improvements would include the regnlatory standards for signage and striping. A total solution would adiIress other elements such as lighting and landscaping, however, first, the crosswalk must he brought to current 2010 MUTCD standanls. Ms. Everett asked about orange cones should be very tempormy and once they are gone who is liable if someoue were to be hi!'? Mr. Mangan said the cones would be there temporarily only to heighten awareness. The cones are not MUTCD standard requirement. They are optional and the idea could be taken off the table and not pursued. Mr. Oblers referred to the distance of the stop bar from the crosswalk. Mr. Mangan said the design is forty feet, detenniued by the traffic design standard He will verify and report. Mr. Oblers referred to the flashing yellow light in the design. Was it on all the time or activated by pedestrians. Mr. Mangan said the design is for always on, constantly flashing. Aoother option would be to activate it in the roadway wheu a car drives over a sensor. It would be far enough out to heighten awareness. He believes it is better solution than a pedestrian activating it is and better than if always on. 56 16 r 1 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Joint Workshop Summary Minntes December 21, 2(J(J9 A9 ... Mr. Oblers agreed and said that flashing light alerts the driver there are pedestrians in the roadway. Mr. laizzo asked abont pedestrian actil'lltion where the pedestrian presses a button and activates a flash to caution drivers there are pedestrians in the roadway. Mr. Mangan said they did look into the possibility and detenniued the project would be a heightened alert for the second or !bird phase, when they can better manage the roadway systems, lighting and other roadway construction. Mr. laizzo said it is an ideal situation to have a pedestrian activated flash lighting crosswalk. Ms. Murray said flashing yellow does not work and what color did Mr. laiu.o suggest. Mr. Iaizzo said red. Ms. Murray agreed. She believes yellow does not work. People see yellow and proceed, they do not stop. Dr. Raia said flash lighting activation should be by the pedestrian. Mr. Mangan said pedestrian activation would more likely he red, and anto activation yellow. The goal is to call forth a warning that one is entering a crosswalk zone. Mr. Oblers referred to red flash lighting by pedestrian activation and is red allowable. Mr. Mangan said he wonld have to verify if pedestrian activation of red flashing lighting is allowed and the forty feet distance between the stop bar and crosswalk and report back immediately. Mr. laizzo asked about pennitting tnrnaround time. Mr. Mangan said because it is an existing crosswalk, it is a stIaigbtforward process of getting the approval of the budget and to do the work. Mr. Sannoons said the distance between the stop bar and crosswalk is a range from twenty to fifty feet in advance. Mr. Mangan win verify what the standard is. He confirmed his understanding of the Board and Committee consensus to have the stop bar placed closer to the crosswalk. The Board consensus was to discuss and approve work as an agenda item on January 6. Mr. Lnkasz said he would be able to report on January 6 costs for improvements and whether the project is paid for and work performed by the Transportation department. Mr. Mangan presented several other midblock crosswalk locatiOllS and intersections for improvements. Midblock crosswalks in lmal fonn should oontain piner l1lock fuuning and high friction surface applied to the crosswalk. They do not recommend paver block framing at intersection crosswalks with stop signs. Mr. Uek asked abont a raised crosswalk area. 57 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican BaJ' Foundation Strategic Planning coml.6 I 1 Joint Workshop Summary Minutes December 21, 2009 A9 Mr. Mangan said a small lift might be done, bnt raised higher canse drainage problems and suggested avoiding raising them. Ms. Murray said the recommendations made and whatever is approved and installed needs to be proven effective before they construct more. She referred to entrances at the Cormnons and was north or south a better location. Mr. Mangan said they designed it south of Hyde Park to allow for some separation to the approaching Gnlf Park intersection. He will look at the area again. Mr. laizzo said consbUction will begin soon for new high-rise buildings and continue for about four years and they should take into account heavy equipment and roadway surfaces being able to withstand. Mr. Mangan said the ~stem they woald recommend be put in place should be able to withstand the construction and debris, but if crosswalk designs happen to be in a high coostruclion area, they can restripe as needed in those areas, and when construction complete, implement the final solution. Construction traIlic control patterns and direclioo should be planned and known otherwise the problem becomes one for the entire community. The system needs to be able to carry the traffic load. Dr. Raia said the pathway that leads to the North walk in from of the boardwalk or berm is completely daJk and they should consider lighting. Mr. Mangan said they would adiIress this location and olheIS when they meet with Frank Laney of the Foundation. Mr. Moffatt referred to Mr. Mangan's comment regarding JlIIVers woald ouly be installed at permanent intersections, not midblock crossings. Mr. Mangan said that is correct. Mr. Moffatt referred to aesthetics and ftom what he nnderstood the goal was mtiformity amongst crosswalks communitywide. Mr. Mangan said crosswalks would be constructed unifmmly to adhere to traffic standards, i.e., striping would be the same at bard intersections. At midblock crosswalks because the traffic must continue to flow, the County suggested some level of tactile surface, but there were no plans to have pavers at ntidblock crosswalks except at one location on Pelican Bay Boulevard and ooe on Gnlf Pad< Drive. Mr. Moffatt asked why conld they not all be the same. Mr. Mangan said the midblock crosswalks do Dnt have the same traffic control as a liard intersection with stop signs and there should be some le.'e/ of heightened ,.sibililJ', 00/ installing pavers at midblock crosswalks would be very expensive to do at every location. Mr. Lickhalter said he thought aesthetics are a concern and no ideas should he dismissed. 58 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay FOlUldation Strategic Planning comlb r 1 Joint Workshop Summary Minutes December 21, 2009 A9 Mr. Mangan agreed and said was not trying to discount Mr. Moffiltt's comments. They will develop a tier of recommendations, i.e., minimum solution to total solution with preliminary costs. Once they know the cost of one project then they will bave a better idea of total cosI. PATHWAYS Mr. t..1angan discussed pathways and existing condilinns. The pathways are currently five fect wide and they are considering widening to eight feet. They are looking at other ideas and 1Ia.'e designed three options. Oae is 10 widen one side to eight feet. Another is to widen both sides to eight feet. The third idea is to reduce the roadway travel lanes in the roadway from twelve feet wide to ten feet wide for a bicycle lanc. Ms. Bellone asked if they have received the Collier County Sheriff's Office traffic incident report. Mr. Mangan said yes, he would distribute electronically, but it is not as helpful as they would have liked. [t does provide a good base. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION Mr. Sammons said they are narrowing down locations for improvements at Pelican Bay Boulevard at Crayton Road and Pelican Bay Boulevard at GnlfPark Drive. They are observing existing conditions and will recommend accordingly. Gond base exists. The medians along the roadway sbould have low ground cover for sight visibility. Removing sod will conserve water and maintenance. They ideas are moving toward consistency and highlighting focal point areas with accent plants. At areas along the sides of the roadway, working with associatious,.tbey can improve the look and consistency at the property lines by layering existing hedges with shorter plants and applying undulation of earth grading along long stretches of open areas. Lake areas can be improved by removing some sod at /lie lake edges to filter runoff and keep fertilizcr and pesticides away from the water. Mr. Lickbaltec suggested e'<tending the medians at the aforementioued intersections to give pedestrians more refuge in the middle of the roadway and enhance safety. Mr. Mangan interpreted Mr. LickhaIter's comments. Rather than crossing into traffic, adjost the break in the curb and move it to extend the median Mr. Sammons said Pelican Bay Boulevard and Gnlf Park Drive is a prominent intersection and accent appropriately with plants and pavers to bring nt1ention to it, , introduce mid level understory structure and tmdulation of earth grading, keeping in mind visibility, consistency and coordination willi associations. 59 16 , 1 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic PlaDDing Committee Joint Worksbop Summary Minutes December 21,2009 A9 ..... TRAFFIC CALMING Mr. Mangan said they observing Pelican Bay Boulevard and,ld!JiiV...... 'J<\......., =RRWB&Y<<, ~ "-"""""'g '>1lutinns, i.e., adding Q"-vement treatment to the intersections and a rOllJDdabout on one side or both sides of Pelican Bay Boulevard. Roundabouts are smaller than traffic circles. Roundabouts are meant to move traffic through immediately, unlike traffic circles that have traffic control devices sucb as traffic lights. It would replace the current three way controlled stop. Mr. Levy asked Mr. Mangan if a traffic circlc at Pelican Bay Boulevard and Gulf Park Drive would replace the stop signs that are there now. Mr. Mangan said it would "" instead of the three "'w controlled stop. Mr. Levy pointed out many pedestrians cross that intersection in each direction and cars do stop at the stop signs. Bicyclists do not stop at the stop signs. Mr. Mangan said it bas been reported both ways. He explained that Ibis intersection is one of the ones identified earlier to make traffic calming recommendations. This recommended solntion may nnt be chosen. Mr. Levy said removing stop signs to install a traffic circle would make it harder for pedestrians to cross the road. Mr. Mangan said there are several primary intersections in the community where traffic bas the absolnte right of way and side streets are at their mercy. Ridgewood Drive and Pelican Bay Boulevard may be the proper intersection for traffic calming traffic circle and Gulf Park Drive and Pelican Bay Boulevard may not. A three way controlled intersection, such as Pelican Bay Bonlevard and Gnlf Park Drive, a traffic circle is the better intersection design for a long-tenn solution to serve both cars and pedestrians. Mr. Levy asked about traffic c.Jllming along the stJaigbtaway, sucb as Pelican Bay Boulevard Mr. Mangan said the purpose of midbIock crosswalks with beav)' bricks, is to provide some traffic calming techniques to slow traffic because the lengths between stop signs are rnre. The Ridgewood Drive and Pelican Bay Boulevard intersection is a four-way condition. There is a three-way condition at Pelican Bay Boulevard and GulfPalk Drive. Solutions will change depending upon conditions. Mr. Levy said it could be considered a four-way condition because people are driving in and out of the high-rise enttance or exit. Mr. laizzo said the driveway is not collSidered an intersectiOl. ~Uoo bec<\m,e it is \\ot '<\ P"rl m the moving traffic. Mr. Mangan said it is a three-way condition with a driveway cut. 60 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning cOli~ 111 Joint Workshop Summary Minutes 0 December 21, 2009 A9 Mr. Lickllalter asked wllat the advantage is ofllaving a roundabout installed on Pclican Bay Boulevard only southbound versus on both sides. Mr. Mangan said the rn.n."ge iu order to get the traffic lanes to come together into a smaller circle further back is one of a1igruoent. Mr. Lickhalter asked for clarification. If traffic calming is the objective, bow does a roundahont calm traffic. Mr. Mangan said he agrees. The roundabout may provide a greater set of advantages in support of other improvements made farther back. Mr. Levy asked if the stop signs would be removed. Mr. Mangan said yes. A roundabout or traffic circle bas yield signs. Mr. Levy said he was not sore bow to calm traffic aoy better than with stop signs. Dr. Raia said an advantage to having a roundabout or traffic circle is aesthetics. He does not want to give up the stop signs without a pedestrian crossing there. Ms. Bellone said she sees crosswalks in tb.e design. Mr. Levy said they are talking about traffic calming. There are no stop signs. Stop signs stop a car and provide the ultimate traffic calming solution at that intersection. Mr. Mangan said the best traffic calming solution is a traffic circle no matter how many roads are coming in because the shape adjusts to those conditions. They started with Ridgewood Drive becanse it is one of the difficult side streets for pedestrians to cross Pelican Bay Boulevard Pelican Bay Boulevard is vel)'. wide and a traffic circle would not apply at that location. They were cbaJged with improving the intersection of Pelican Bay Boulevard and Gulf Park Drive ultimately a three way stop may serve its purpose, bnt a roundabout or trnffic circle is the solution tb.ey are developing. Mr. laizzo asked Mr. Mangan to clarify Mr. Lickhalter's question regarding how does a roundabout, or traffic circle, calm traffic. Mr. Mangan said the traffic in the traffic circle does slow traffic. Ms. Murray asked how drivers know they are approacbing a roundabout or traffic circle. Mr. Mangan said signage is posted that it is coming up and yield signs just before it and it slows traffic. Dr. Raia said from his experience, a traffic circle or roundabout does not stop traffic as a stop sign does. Mr. Mangan said a crosswalk is the only tbing missing in the intersection. 61 16 I 1 A 9 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Joint Workshop Summary Minutes December 21, 2009 .. Mr. Levy said that he does not tbiok there is a problem and iI is a safe crossing because the cars have a stop sign and they do stop. Ms. Everett asked if midblock crosswalk signage requirements apply to a roundabout or traffic circle. Mr. Mangan said it is a little different, but there is sigoage. It is not a midblock intersection. Mr. Levy said a roundabout or traffic circle would not deter traffic from nsing the community as a cut through because it removes a place where cars currently have to stop. Mr. Mangan said he appreciates the input and the Board and Committee do not have to approvc the recommendations. Mr. Dallas asked if a roundahont or traffic circle and the high friction surface are mutually exclusive. Both seem to slow down traffic. Mr. Mangan said the "rumble noder your tires" certainly helps. THE COMMUNITY BERM Mr. Mangan said they are comfortable with locations they chose for overlooks along the berm because the visual and environmental aspects at those locations are unique. Because the community benn is also a water management system and exposed piping, in Phase One they can cover the pipes by installing a plJltform over them. The platfonn would still provide access to the pipes. In Phase Two, it may be reasonable to widen the path to ten to twelve feet in one direction from the North tram station to the Sandpiper tram station. The third phase would be to connect the improvements made in Phases One and Two. Their ideas so far are developing with the parameter mentioned in mind. Mr. Dallas asked if the designs would still allow animals to climb over top of the berm and noticeable. Mr. Mangan said yes. Mr. LickbaIter said some years ago the landscaping done around Tram station eight "caused a revolution." Mr. laizzo said the uproar was because the landscaping was changed to reflect a park-like setting. The community wanted it kept the way it was. Mr. Mangan said there are some areas with plants that do not belong because they are invasive or exotic and other areas where they wonld recoDUUend removing sod. Mr. laizzo said to keep in mind that if the benn is enhanced more plants or somelbing that was not already there, the maintenance cost will go np. Mr. Mangan said yes, that is sometbing to consider when recommending improvements. 62 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board & Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning !m~ittL 1 Joint Workshop Summary Minutes December 21, 2009 A9 Mr. Dallas said removing sod and replacing it willi a Daluta1 ground cover lowers the cost of maintenance. Dr. Raja tbioks the community will not accept ideas to widen the henn. Mr. laizzo said theyshould consider the natmaI habital and IHlI disrupt. Mr. Mangan said theircbarge is, "don't screw il up." ENTRYWAYMONUMENTS Mr. Mangan said they have more entryway monUl1lCJds and signage designs 10 develop. One observation is the current entryway signage is dated and the design does not wod<:. The iron funce's grillwork can be filled with stucco or another natural and native material. A simple improvement includes an expression that is unifying and makes a good horizontal and solid statement. Other signage should be made uoifono along the roadways and proportionate to what ODe is trying to achieve, whether it be way finding, anoonocements, or traffic signage. Mr. Moffatt said at Gulf Pad< Drive and Pelican Bay Boulevanl they introduce RoyaI PaIms and the Royal palms should be planted at the entraoceways. Mr. Mangan said Royal palms should be used spariogIy, SO they do not express other places like Palm Beach. They are native, but nature does not line them op. Royal palms should be used in a more natural setting. Other more striking plants can be used instead. Mr. LickbaIter referred to Mr. Mangan's comment that Pelican Bay is not Palm Beach. What is the message or brand that Pelican Bay wants to express by entryway signage. Mr. Mangan said all elements including the natmallan.-I""3pe all(hignage should express the Pelican Bay brand. Mr. Oblers said they should consider the size of signage. Massive could be negative and suggested filling in areas in between. Mr. Mangan said that was a good point and maybe the fill areas could be with plants, raIber than stucco. Mr. Lickhalter said there is no m~nd~t" 10 IOOdify what is there now. Ms. Bellone said according to the designs they have broken up the fill in areas and it does not look massive. Mr. Mangan said yes, there is movement and it is broken up, but Mr. Oblers' comments are good one. He announced the upcoming meetings, said thank you and concluded the presentation. ~aM;1l~ Womble, Chairwoman Minutes by Lisa Resnick 2/1/201012:37:29 PM 63 Fiala J>..E.J ~. Halas Henning Coyle Coletta December 21, 2009: Phase II Workshop Pelican Bay Community Improyement Plan A. Crosswalks . North Tram Station . Other Mid Block Crosswalks - Phase I and II . Community Wide plans B. Pathway systems . Existing Conditions . Options 1, 2 and 3 C. Landscape and Irrigation . Pelican Bay Boulevard and Gulf Park Drive D. Traffic Calming . Pelican Bay Boulevard and Gulf Park Drive E. The Community Berm . Improvement plan locations F. Entry Monumentation 1212112009 - 216267 - Ver: 1 - KMANGAN N0103-Q86.002_ -0 1611 A9J RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2010 Board 01 ~ CoImIiIlIiQnln COfre~: Datt-r !i~m~ . , "~"^"''"'''''"'''~'-'-''~.'-- RE: Pelican Bay Blvd Crosswalk 16 r 1 Pa~1 of~ A"J Kevin Mangan From: CalvertEugene [EugeneCalvert@colliergov.net] Sent: Monday, December 21,200912:21 PM To: Kyle Lukasz Cc: YuSteve; Kevin Mangan; BuchheitDavid; lipton_b; Mark Burtchin Subject: RE: Pelican Bay Blvd Crosswalk Kyle, Thank you for meeting with David Buchheit and me this morning on Pelican Bay Blvd to look at the crosswalk near the shuttle station. As Pelican Bay looks at developing a pathway improvement master plan we would be glad to work with you to implement interim measures to make the crosswalk safer. As I discussed, the Federal Highway Administration (fHWA) has recently released the new 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). While the Horida Department of Transportation (FOOT) has not yet adopted the new guidelines, it is anticipated that they will within the next few months. As Wilson Miller develops the master plan, they should utilize the new MUTCD to provide some guidance. I will have our traffic engineer, Mr. Steve Yu, develop a proposed interim crosswalk sign and marking plan and coordinate his efforts with you. Due to the holidays, it may be the first week in January before Mr. Yu will be able to contact you. Thank you for your interest in making our streets and highways safer. Sin<:erely, Gene C. 12/2112009 WilsOnMillet ~ 16' 1 'A9 ... To: From: Date: Re: Pelican Bay Imp~ove MastJ81)Pla Kevin G. Manga ' \:::::9 December 21, 2009 Mid Block Crosswalk review and recomme We have been joined by Kyle Lukasz, Richard Dahn, members of the Collier County Sherriff's Department and the Collier County Transportation Services Division at the North Tram Station existing pedestrian crosswalk to review developing recommendations for both immediate and long term improvements of this facility to benefit both the pedestrian and the driver. Considering the existing conditions, our recommendations for uniformity and consistency within the Community's current systems, and known future requirements of such facilities, WilsonMiller recommends the following first phase improvements for the North Tram Station pedestrian crossing: Recommendations - First Phase Permanent Improvements: Installing traffic striping and traffic control devices in accordance to future 2010 design and operational standards. 1. Provide high visibility, "piano key" striping for a ten foot wide crosswalk dimension - paint the entire crosswalk area field to a 10 foot width and the existing white crosswalk striping in black vehicular rated traffic paint; then paint the high visibility pattern noted above in white thermoplastic highway paint atop the black field area of the cross walk. The high visibility piano key striping will be the requirement for mid block crossing use for pedestrian crosswaiks from 2010 forward. 2. Paint with thermoplastic highway paint a white regulation dimensioned stop bar across the roadway at the locations of lhe middle sign in the three sign announcement of the pedestrian crosswalk from each direction - this is the existing sign with the long vertical face that announces yielding to pedestrians in crosswalks. 3. Replace the middle sign plate in the three sign announcement of the pedestrian crosswalk with a MUTCD, R1-5b Stop Here for pedestrians (pedestrian symbol is used) in each direction. The existing sign according to the MUTCD (Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) is no longer an option for 2010 use in a post top mounted, travel lane parallel location. Select sections of the MUTCD we have reviewed in the field are attached. Optional First Phase Temporarv Additions: Building driver expectations of the mid block crossing and the awareness of a stop condition requirement with pedestrians in the crosswalk. A. Install a flexible sign standard wilh the long vertical sign face noted in item 2 above attached to it on the center skip striping of the two travel lanes in each direction - this is allowable to be a permanent solution should the community desire this to be left in place. B. For the duration of the project works listed in 1, 2 and 3 above, and for a period not to exceed ninety days thereafter, permit and allow for the use of 3 orange traffic cones in each direction for the purposes of maintenance of traffic (MOT) in conjunction with this work. C. Add a yellow traffic beacon atop the stop bar sign post (or other as allowed) in item 3 above. We also suggest four additional mid block crosswalks are designed, permitted and installed on Pelican Bay Blvd., in locations to be approved, matching the improvements produced by the above. Cc: Collier County Sherriffs Department: Cpl. Carmine Marceno Collier County Transportation Services Division: Eugene Calvert, David Buchheit - "p,':;-Ht- (Ih,( 3200 Bailey Lane Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 800.649.4336 239.649.4040 F 239.643.5716 WllsonMiller.com 12/2112009.216266. Ver: 1 - KMANGAN N0103-08IJ.-002-_0 2009 Edition 16' 1 A~ Page 53 - '''ll Section 28.08 YIELD Sign (Rl-2) Standard: 01 The YIELD (RI-2) sign (see Figure 2B-l) shall be a downward-pointing equilateral triangle with a wide red border and the legend YIELD in red on a white background. Support: 02 The YIELD sign assigns right-otCway to traffic on certain approaches to an intersection. Vehicles controlled by a YIELD sign need to slow down to a speed that is reasonable for the existing conditions or stop when necessary to avoid interfering with conflicting traffic. Section 28.09 YIELD Sil;:n Applications Option: 01 YIELD signs may be installed: A. On the approaches to a through street or highway where conditions are such that a full stop is not always required. B. At the second crossroad of a divided highway, where the median width at the intersection is 30 feet or greater. In this case, a STOP or YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the first roadway of a divided highway, and a YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the second roadway. C. For a channelized turn lane that is separated from the adjacent travel lanes by an island, even if the acliacent lanes at the intersection are controlled by a highway traffic control signal or by a STOP sign. D. At an intersection where a special problem exists and where engineering judgment indicates the problem to be susceptible to correction by the use of the YIELD sign. E. Facing the entering roadway for a merge-type movement if engineering judgment indicates that control is needed because acceleration geometry and/or sight distance is not adequate for merging traffic operation. Standard: 02 A YIELD (RI-2) sign shall be used to assign right-of-way at the entrance to a roundabout. YIELD signs at roundabouts shall be used to control the approach roadways and shall not be used to control tbe circulatory roadway. 03 Other than for all of the approaches to a roundabout, YIELD signs shall not be placed on all of the approaches to an intersection. Section 28.10 STOP Silm or YIELD Sie-n Placement Standard: 01 The STOP or YIELD sign shall he installed on the near side of the intersection on the right-hand side of the approach to which it applies. When the STOP or YIELD sign is installed at this required location and the sign visibility is restricted, a Stop Ahead sign (see Section 2C.36) shall be installed in advance of the STOP sign or a Yield Ahead sign (see Section 2C.36) shall be installed in advance of the YIELD sign. 02 The STOP or YIELD sign shall be located as close as practical to the intersection it regulates, while optimizing its visibility to the road user it is intended to regulate. 03 STOP signs and YIELD signs shall not be mounted on the same post. 04 No items other than inventory stickers, sign installation dates, and bar codes shall be affixed to the fronts of STOP or YIELD signs, and the placement of these items shall be in the border of the sign. 05 No items other than official traffic control signs, inventory stickers, sign installation dates, anti-vandalism stickers, and bar codes shall be mounted on the backs of STOP or YIELD signs. 06 No items other than retrorellective strips (see Section 2A.21) or official traffic control signs shall be mounted on the fronts or backs of STOP or YIELD signs supports. Guidance: 07 STOP or YIELD signs should not be placedfarther than 50 feet from the edge of the pavement of the intersected roadway (see Drawing F in Figure 2A-3). 08 A sign that is mounted back-to-back wirh a STOP or YIELD sign should sray wirhin the edges of the STOP or YIELD sign. Ifnecessary, the size of the STOP or YIELD sign should be increased so rhat any other sign installed back-Io-back with a STOP or YIELD sign remains wilhin rhe edges of the STOP or YIELD sign. Option: 09 Where drivers proceeding straight ahead must yield to traffic approaching from the opposite direction, such as at a one-lane bridge, a TO ONCOMING TRAFFIC (Rl-2aP) plaque may be mounted below the YIELD sign. December 2009 Sect. 2B.08to2B,1O Page 54 16 , zlEditiA 9 Support: 10 Figure 2A-3 shows examples of some typical placements of STOP signs and YIELD signs. 11 Section 2A.16 contains additional information about separate and combined mounting of other signs with STOP or YIELD signs. Guidance: 12 Stop lines that are used to supplement a STOP sign should be located as described in Section 3B.16. Yield lines that are used to supplement a YIELD sign should be located as described in Section 3B.16. 13 Where there is a marked crosswalk ar the inrersection, the STOP sign should be installed in advance of the crosswalk line nearest to the approaching traffic. 14 Except at roundabouts, where there is a marked crosswalk at the inrersection, the YIELD sign should be installed in advance of the crosswalk line nearesr ro the approaching traffic. 15 Where two roads intersect at an acute angle, the STOP or YIELD sign should be positioned at an angle, or shielded, so that the legend is out of view of traffic to which it does not apply. 16 If a raised splirrer island is available on the left-hand side of a mulri-lane roundabout approach, an additional YIELD sign should be placed on the left-hand side of the approach. Option: 17 If a raised splitter island is available on the left-hand side of a single lane roundabout approach, an additional YIELD sign may be placed on the left-hand side of the approach. 18 At wide-throat intersections or where two or more approach lanes of traffic exist on the signed approach, observance of the right-of-way control may be improved by the installation of an additional STOP or YIELD sign on the left-hand side of the road and/or the use of a stop or yield line. At channelized intersections or at divided roadways separated by a median, the additional STOP or YIELD sign may be placed on a channelizing island or in the median. An additional STOP or YIELD sign may also be placed overhead facing the approach at the intersection to improve observance of the right~of-way control. Standard: 19 More than one STOP sign or more than one YIELD sign shall not be placed on the same support facing in the same direction. Option: 20 For a yield-controlled channelized right-turn movement onto a roadway without an acceleration lane and for an entrance ramp onto a freeway or expressway without an acceleration lane, a NO MERGE AREA (W4-5P) supplemental plaque (see Section 2CAO) may be mounted below a Yield Ahead (W3-2) sign and/or below a YIELD (RI-2) sign when engineering judgment indicates that road users would expect an acceleration lane to be present. Section 28.11 Yield Here To Pedestrians Sig-ns and Stop Here For Pedestrians Signs (RI-5 Series) Standard: 01 Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians (RI-5, Rl-5a, Rl-5b, or Rl-5e) signs (see Figure 2B-2) shall be used if yield (stop) lines are used in advance of a marked crosswalk that crosses an uncontrolled multi-lane approach. The Stop Here for Pedestrians signs shall only be used where the law specifically requires that a driver must stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk. The legend STATE LAW may be displayed at the top of the Rl-5, Rl-5a, Rl-5b, and Rl-5c signs, if applicable. Guidance: 02 If yield (stop) lines and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs are used in advance of a crosswalk rhat crosses an uncontrolled multi-lane approach, they should be placed 20 to 50 feet in advance of the nearest crosswalk line (see Section 3B.16 and Figure 3B-17). and parking should be prohibited in the area between the yield (stop) line and the crosswalk. 03 Yield (stop) lines and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs should not be used in advance of crosswalks that cross an approach to or departure from a roundabout. Option: 04 Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs may be nsed in advance of a crosswalk that crosses an uncontrolled multi-lane approach to indicate to road users where to yield (stop) even if yield (stop) lines are not used. Sect. 28.10 to 28.11 December 2009 2009 Edition VI HERE ~ Ie TO " Rl-5 STATE LAW VI TO . ~ WITHIN CROSSWALK Rl-6 16 , 1 A9 Page 55 Figure 28-2. Unsignalized Pedestrian Crosswalk Signs VI HERE ~ PEDESTRIANS . HERE ~ PEDESTRIANS . HERE ~ Ie FOR" R1-5a .1il1-5b Rl-5c * STATE LAW . FOR . ~ WITHIN CROSSWALK * The legend STATE LAW is optional. A fluorescent yellow-green background color may be used instead of yellow for this sign. * STATE LAW * * YIELD TO PEDESTRIANS * R1-9 STATE LAW * * STOP FOR PEDESTRIANS * R1.9a ~1,.sa 05 A Pedestrian Crossing (WIl-2) warning sign may be placed overhead or may be post-mounted with a diagonal downward pointing arrow (WI6-7P) plaque at the crosswalk location where Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs have been installed in advance of the crosswalk. Standard: 06 If a WU-2 sign has been post-mounted at the crosswalk location where a Yield "ere To (Stop "ere For) Pedestrians sign is used on the approach, the Yield "ere To (Stop "ere For) Pedestrians sign shall not be placed on the same post as or block the road user's view of the WU-2 sign. Option: 07 An advance Pedestrian Crossing (WI 1-2) warning sign with an AHEAD or a distance supplemental plaque may be used in conjunction with a Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians sign on the approach to the same crosswalk. 08 In-Street Pedestrian Crossing signs and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs may be used together at the same crosswalk. Section 28.12 In-Street and Overhead Pedestrian CrossinI!' Sil!ns (RI-6. Rl-6a. RI-9. and RI-9a) Option: 01 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing (RI-6 or RI-6a) sign (see Figure 2B-2) or the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing (RI-9 or RI-9a) sign (see Figure 2B-2) may be used to remind road users of laws regarding right-of-way at an unsignalized pedestrian crosswalk. The legend STATE LAW may be displayed at the top of the RI-6, RI-6a, RI-9, and RI-9a signs, if applicable. On the RI-6 and RI-6a signs, the legends STOP or YIELD may be used instead of the appropriate STOP sign or YIELD sign symbol. December 2009 Sect. 28.111028.12 Page 56 16 , !o9EdiA 9 .... 02 Highway agencies may develop and apply criteria for determining the applicability of In-Street Pedestrian Crossing signs. Standard: 03 If used, the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be placed in the roadway at the crosswalk location on the center line, on a lane line, or on a median island. The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be post-mounted on the left-hand or right-hand side of the roadway. 04 If used, the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be placed over the roadway at the crosswalk location. 05 An In-Street or Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be placed in advance of the crosswalk to educate road users about the State law prior to reaching the crosswalk, nor shall it be installed as an educational display that is not near any crosswalk. Guidance: 06 Ifan island lsee Chapter 31) is available, rhe In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign, if used, should be placed on the island. Option: 07 If a Pedestrian Crossing (WII-2) warning sign is used in combination with an In-Street or an Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign, the WII-2 sign with a diagonal downward pointing arrow (WI6-7P) plaque may be post-mounted on the right-hand side of the roadway at the crosswalk location. Standard: OB The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign and the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be used at signalized locations. 09 The STOP FOR legend shall only be used in States where the State law specifically requires that a driver must stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk. 10 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall have a black legend (except for the red STOP or YIELD sign symbols) and border on a white background, surrounded by an outer yellow or fluorescent yellow-green background area (see Figure 2B-2). The Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall have a black legend and border on a yellow or fluorescent yellow-green background at the top of the sign and a black legend and border on a white background at the bottom of the sign (see Figure 2B-2). 11 Unless the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign is placed on a physical island, the sign support shall be designed to bend over and then bounce back to its normal vertical position when struck by a vehicle. Support: 12 The Provisions of Section 2A.IS concerning mounting height are not applicable for the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign. Standard: 13 The top of an In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be a maximum of 4 feet above the pavement surface. The top of an In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign placed in an island shall be a maximum of 4 feet above the island surface. Optiou: 14 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign may be used seasonably to prevent damage in winter because of plowing operations, and may be removed at night if the pedestrian activity at night is minimal. 15 In-Street Pedestrian Crossing signs, Overhead Pedestrian Crossing signs, and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs may be used together at the same crosswalk. Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1) Standard: 01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles. 02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering stndy. The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another. Sect. 28.]2 to 2B.13 December 2009 2009 Edition WB-6 Wll-l1 16 , 1 A9 Page 129 Figure 2C-l0. Vehicular Traffic Warning Signs and Plaques Wl1-1* W11-S W11-Sa Wll-B Wll-lO W11-1S* EMERGENCY SIGNAL AHEAD W11-1SP* (optional) Wll-1Sa* TRAIL X-ING W11-12P W11-14 * A fluorescent yellow-green background color may be used for this sign or plaque. Support: 02 These locations might be relatively confined or might occur randomly over a segment of roadway. Guidance: 03 Vehicular Traffic Warning signs should be used only at locations where the road user's sight distance is restricted, or the condition, activity, or entering traffic would be unexpected. 04 If the condition or activity is seasonal or temporary, the Vehicular Traffic Warning sign should be removed or covered when the condition or activity does not exist. Option: 05 The combined Bicycle/Pedestrian (WI I-IS) sign may be used where both bicyclists and pedestrians might be crossing the roadway, such as at an intersection with a shared-use path. A TRAIL X-ING (Wll-ISP) supplemental plaque (see Figure 2C-1O) may be mounted below the WIl-lS sign. The TRAIL CROSSING (WIl-lSa) sign may be used to warn of shared-use path crossings where pedestrians, bicyclists, and other user groups might be crossing the roadway. 06 The WIl-l. WIl-lS, and WIl-ISa signs and theirrelated supplemental plaques may have a fluorescent yellow-green background with a black legend and border. 07 Supplemental plaques (see Section 2C.S3) with legends such as AHEAD, XX FEET, NEXT XX MILES, or SHARE THE ROAD may be mounted below Vehicular Traffic Warning signs to provide advance notice to road users of unexpected entries. Guidance: OB /fused in advance ofa pedesrrian and bicycle crossing, a WII-J5 or Wll-J5a sign should be supplemented with an AHEAD or XX FEET plaque to inform road users that they are approaching a point where crossing activity might occur. Standard: 09 If a post-mounted WIl-I, WIl-lI, WIl-IS, or WIl-ISa sign is placed at the location ofthe crossing point where golf carts, pedestrians, bicyclists, or other shared-use path users might be crossing the roadway, a diagonal downward pointing arrow (WI6-7P) plaque (see Figure 2C-12) shall be mounted below the sign. If the WIl-I, WIl-lI, WIl-lS, or WIl-lSa sign is mounted overhead, the WI6-7P supplemental plaque shall not be used. Option: 10 The crossing location identified by a WI I-I, WII-ll, WII-IS, or WII-15a sign may be defined with crosswalk markings (see Section 3B.18). December 2009 Sect. 2C.49 16 f I A9 ...'"~ Page 130 2009 Edition Standard: 11 The Emergency Vehicle (Wll-8) sign (see Figure 2C-IO) with the EMERGENCY SIGNAL AHEAD (Wll-12P) supplemental plaque (see Figure 2C-IO) shall be placed in advance of all emergency-vehicle traffic control signals (see Chapter 4G). Option: 12 The Emergency Vehicle (Wll-8) sign, or a word message sign indicating the type of emergency vehicle (such as rescue squad), may be used in advance of the emergency-vehicle station when no emergency-vehicle traffic control signal is present. 13 A Warning Beacon (see Section 4L.03) may be used with any Vehicular Traffic Warning sign to indicate specific periods when the condition or activity is present or is likely to be present, or to provide enhanced sign conspicuity. 14 A supplemental WHEN FLASHING (WI6-13P) plaque (see Figure 2C-12) may be used with any Vehicular Traffic Warning sign that is supplemented with a Warning Beacon to indicate specific periods when the condition or activity is present or is likely to be present. Section 2C.SO Non-Vehicular Warning Sit:ns IWIt-2, WIt-3. WIt.4, WIt-6. WIt-7, WIt-9. and WIt-I6 through WIt-22l Option: 01 Non-Vehicular Warning (Wll-2, Wll-3, Wll-4. WII-6. WII-?, Wll-9, and Wll-16 through Wll-22) signs (see Figure 2C-ll) may be used to alert road users in advance of locations where unexpected entries into the roadway might occur or where shared use of the roadway by pedestrians, animals, or equestrians might occur. Support: 02 These conflicts might be relatively confined, or might occur randomly over a segment of roadway. Guidance: 03 !fused in advance ofa pedestrian, snowmobile, or equesrrian crossing, the WIl-2, Wll-6, WlI-7, and WlJ-9 signs should be supplemented with plaques Isee Section 2C.55) with the legend AHEAD or XX FEET to inform road users that they are approaching a point where crossing activity might occur. Figure 2C-11. Non-Vehicular Warning Signs WII-2* W11-3 (Deer) W11-4 (Cow) Wl1.6 Wl1-? WI1-16 (Bear) Wll-l? (Sheep) Wl1-1S (Bighorn Sheep) WII-19 (Donkey) WII-20 (Elk) WII-22 (Wild Horse) WI5-1* W11-21 (Moose) * A fluorescent yellow-green background color may be used for this sign or plaque. Sect. 2C.49 to 2C50 December 2009 1611 A9 , SUMMARY MINUTES PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD REGULAR SESSION JANUARY 6,2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Pelican Bay Services Division Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on Wednesday, January 6, 2010 at 1:00 PM in Regular Session at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples with the following members present: Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board Memhers Mary Aooe Womble, Chairwoman Michael Levy Keith Dallas, Vice Chairman Gerald Moffatt Tom Cravens Hunter Hansen Geoffrey Gibson Theodore Raia John laizzo Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Neil Dorrill, Administrator Kyle Lukasz, Field Operatioos Manager Mary McCaughtry, Recording Secretary Lisa Resnick, Administrative Assistant Community Improvements Plan Update Presentation Kevin Mangan, Principal & Landscape Architect, Wilson Miller 1. Roll Call 2. Wilson Miller Community Improvements Plan Update 3. Agenda Approval 4. Approval of Summary Meeting Minutes a. November 17, 2009 Community Improvements Plan Joint Workshop b. November 19,2009 Community Improvements Plan Community Educational Meeting Session One c. November 19, 2009 Community Improvements Plan Community Educational Meeting Session Two d. November 30, 2009 Community Improvements Plan Joint Workshop e. December 2, 2009 Regular Session 5. Audience Participation 6. Administrator's Report a. Independent Expert PBS & J Clam Bay Analysis Peer Review Update b. North Tram Statioo Pedestrian Safety Issues Update c. Monthly financial Report 7. Chairwoman's Report a. Pelican Bay Services Division Board Appticatloos Discussion & Recommendations b. Community Improvements Plan Update (by Vice Chairman Dallas) c. Notice of Upcoming Meetings 8. Capital Projects a. Lake Bank Enhancements b. South Berm Reconstruction 9. Community Issues 10. Committee Reports and/or Requests 11. Old Business 12. New Business 13. Miscellaneous Correspondence a. Ongoing Projects Status Sheet 14. AudienceComments 15. Adjournment AGENDA ROLL CALL All Board members were present and quorum established. 8270 Pelican Bay Services Division Boord Regular Session Summary Minutes Jannary 6, 2010 16 , 1 A9 .. WILSON MILLER COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN UPDATE Mr. Kevin Mangan said Mr. Steve Sammoos was here today, as well as Mr. Wayne Hart to answer transportation- related technical questions. He announced the January II Community Improvements Plan town hall meetings. At the December town hall meetings, Wilson Miller explained the Community Improvements Plan process. At this meeting, the audience is encouraged to participate in the design review process and provide input. They met with the County's transportatioo department December 21 regarding the North tram station crosswalk interim and long-term solutions. The County will assist with the interim solution by bringing to crosswalk to current standards with high visibility striping; a stop bar as close to crosswalk as possible, or twenty reet, and replace signage. Madam Chair Womble asked what the time line is. Mr. Mangan said it should take several weeks for the County to complete the designs and then a few weeks more to install. He and Mr. Lukasz determined it would cost approximately $4,000 to bring the crosswalk to current traffic standards. It will provide a higher visibility to drivers. Madam Chair Womble asked if they could use the same designs fur improvements in the future fur consistency. Mr. Mangan said yes. There may be some modificatioos made as necessary, but the striping and signage meets current traffic standards. Mr. Dallas said he thought this was a tempocary solution fur this crosswalk and they were going to hold off on other areas until they come up with loog-term solutions. Mr. Mangan said there might be some areas done in advance utilizing intermediary solutions and those areas will meet current 20 I 0 standards. They will introduce long-term solutions later." Mr. Gibson asked Mr. Mangan to describe a stop bar and if it is similar to a speed bump with high friction srice. Mr. Mangan said no, a stop bar is not like a speed bump. The high friction surfuce is a different color from the roadway, is made of crushed material, and applied as an epoxy to the asphalt. It makes a tactile noise as one drives over it. Mr. Moffiltt asked if the $4,000 estimate includes providing electricity and flashing lights like the design shows. Mr. Mangan said the yellow flashing lights, estimated to cost $9,000 fur lighting and wiring is supplemental to standard signage and striping. Mr. Cravens asked if the flashing light is activated or continuous. Mr. Mangan said continuous flashing is under consideration. Activated lighting is something they are looking into for the future. 8271 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16/1 A9 ... Mr. Cravens said his concern is that drivers would become accustomed to a continuous flashing light, whereas if pedestrians activate 1he lights, it would be more effective. Mr. Mangan said activation is something they are looking into in 1he future. Right now, they are focusing on current standards fur signage and striping. Madam Chair Womble thanked Wilson Miller for addressing 1his community issue so quickly and efficiently. Dr. Raia asked if solar power could oftSet the cost of wiring electricity. Mr. Lukasz said the cost considers solar power. Mr. Iaizzo asked ifhe could make a motion to move ahead on this project. Madam Chair Womble said they have already approved moving forward and waiting for final plans to approve. Mr. Mangan said the County's transportation department is working on the final plans. He provided 1he Colli... County Sheriff's office incidmt report to Ms. Resnick to distribute electroniCally. Mr. Gibson asked if Board members should attmd the January It town hall meetings. Mr. Mangan encouraged the Board members to attend. Mr. Moffiltt referred to 1he designs fur crosswalks at other locations and asked if 1hose projects are moving forward. Mr. Mangan said no. They are midblock crosswalks identified to improve in the future. Mr. Hoppensteadt said there is a change order received from Wilson Mill... fur three roads nQl included in the original scope: Crayton Road, Myra Janco Daniels Boulevard, South Ridgewood Drive and soothem edge ofVand...bilt Beach Road. Total cost is $5,880. Breakdown is $1,560 fur the Foundation and $2,320 fur the Services Division and the Board needs to approve it. Mr. DaIh1s mmIe II -un. to apprtJI1e tile Community ImprolIemI!nts PI"" cluutge order m:elved from Wilson Miller adding Cl'rIyton Rout/, Myl'/J Jmrco Daniels Boulevard, South RJdgewood Drive ami tile SOIIthem edge of VIIIUIUbiIt Bead! RDtuIIlDt included in tile orig/1UIl sCtJpt!. Total cost Is $5,880. Breakdown Is $1,560 forthe Foumlation tlII(/ $2,320 for the Services Divlston tlII(/ the BotUt/. Mr. Cravens seco1Uled. The BtHUd WJIeJlIlllll1l1lnlHm to the motion. Mr. Moffiltt asked does the County need to approve the change order. Mr. Dorrill said he believes 1he Services Division was delegated 1hat aothority. A budget amendment however, would require Board of County Commission...s approval. He will verilY and report. AGENDA APPROVAL Dr. Raia requested an add-on agenda item to provide and discuss infonnation regarding installing navigational markers in Clam Pass. 8272 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minntes January 6, 2010 16' 1 A 9 " Madam Chair Womble asked if the information being given is of concern and under the Services Division's purview, or educational in nature. Dr. Raia said he respects the Board of County Commissioner decision to remove responsibilities for Clam Bay and Clam Pass from the Services Division however, the Services Division's Board is responsible for advising the Commissioners ofthe community's concerns. He believes to strike a balance between the two, under no circumstances should they expend funds toward Clam Bay, but he shares his constituency's concerns and believes those concerns should be brought before the Commission. Madam Chair Womble recognized Dr. Raia's agenda item as educatiooal in nature. Mr. Dorrill said he normally would consider this to be new business, however, "let me give you my standard disclaimer. Dr. Raia and I have bad this conversation before and with all due respect, to Dr. Raia, a more appropriate furum and manner to address his specific concerns would be the Foundation in their capacity as master homeowners association. If the Board continues to involve itself periodically in issues where we have neither a property interest or a rule or policy, or restrictive covenant, you are going to run the risk and incur the ire and at some point the wrath of the County Commission. I think they have made it abundantly clear that this advisory board has wide responsibilities to the community but they do not include the issue and dispute between the Foundation and the County with respect to navigational markers. lfwe are going to have this sort of discussion every month, I just want the Board to understand my professional concern is that we are headed down the wrong path and one that you are going to find yourself increasingly in conflict with people in the County we are trying to work with." He said he does not know if the Foundatioo encourages or solicits public comment at their Board meetings, but I amjost concerned if we continue to bang this drum we are going to find ourselves in unnecessary conflict." Dr. Raia said this Board really has not bad a cbance to discuss this issue because every attempt was intercepted. Some of it was by Mr. Dorrill's comments, which he does understand his position considering Mr. Dorrill works for the County. Madam Chair Womble interrupted Dr. Raia and asked him ifhe was interested in discussing this on the agenda. She agrees with Mr. Dorrill, however, ifhe has something educational to provide, it is his right, bnt they need to move on and put the item on the agenda as number twelve, new business. Mr. Cravens mmIe a motion tQ tIJIJH'01'e tod6y's JllllllflI'JI6, 2010 agenda as _1Uled. Mr. Dallas seconded. The Board voted IInanilrrtnlSly tQ approve the JllllllflI'JI6, 2010 agenda as _1lIled. 8273 Pelican Bay Services Division Boord Regular Session Summary Minutes January Ii, 2010 16 J 1 A9 - APPROVAL OF SUMMARY MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 17,2009 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN JOINT WORKSHOP Mr. Levy mode a IIfDtion to approve tlu! NtJ1'e1Ifber 17, 2009 C_nity Imp"""-nts Plan Joint Workshop SIlItI1IIIl1y mInutes. Mr. HflItSen secontkd. The BOtl1'd voted and approved llnanimously the November 17, 2009 C01IfIffIIIIity I11f1"""-nts Pbm Joint Workshop Sllmnuuy mi1llltes. NOVEMBER 19. 2009 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN EDUCATIONAL MEETING SESSION ONE Mr. Moffatt mod eo IIfDtion to approve the November 19, 2009 Session 0Iu! C_niIy Improvements Plan EductliJonoi meeting slI1IfIfIIl1y millllles. Mr. Cravens seconded. The Board voted and approved ananilllOllS/y the November 19,2009 Session One C_nity [, ments Pbm Educationoi meetin sa minutes. NOVEMBER 19.2009 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN EDUCATIONAL MEETING SESSION TWO Mr. Moffatt mod e a motion to approve the NtJ1'e1Ifber 19, 2009 Session Two Community Improvements Plan Educational meeting samnuuy mi1llltes. Mr. Da11as seconded. The Board voted and approved llnanimously tlu! November 19, 2009 Session Two C_nity IlIIDrovements Plan Educationoi meeti Sll millllles. NOVEMBER 30. 2009 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN JOINT WORKSHOP Madam Chair Womble amended page 32 to read, "... they should put meeting and site walk notification cards on the tram." Mr. Levy IIfIIde a mDtlon to approve, as amenJletl, the November 30, 2009 C_lty Improvements Plan Joint Workshop SII1IInIIU'Jl mi1lllteS, Mr. Da1JJIS seconded the mDtlOIL TIu! Board voted and the motion approved IIlIIIIIlmously to approve tlu! NtJ1'e1Ifber 30, 2009 Communltv Improvements Pbm Joint Worksh minutes. APPROVAL OF SUMMARY MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 2. 2009 REGULAR SESSION Mr. Levy amended page 8259. He said he voted in favor of the motion, not against it. Mr. Da1JJIS IIfIIde a motion to approve as lllllellded the >><<-wer 2, 2009 Pelieiut Bay Services Division Reguhu Session SII1IInIIU'Jl mInutes. The motion was seconded. TIu! Board voted and approved unanimously as amended, tlu! NtJ1'e1Ifber 30, 2009 C_nity [, vements Plan Joint Worlrsh SJI ml1llltes. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Mr. Steve Seidel, resident of San Marino at Pelican Bay referred to the pathways south ofSt. Raphael from Pelican Bay Boulevard to the benn. He believes it is County property and has received several complaints from residents concerned about safuty and they requested better lighting along the pathway. 8274 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 161 1 A 9 ~ i Mr. Hoppcosteadt said the pathway is Gulf Bay property and the Foundation is aware and working with Gulf Bay properties fur their approval to begin the electrical work. Ms. Mary Johnson, Mangrove Action Group, said they must restore transparency and accountability to the County's plans to manage Clam Bay and Clam Pass. She distributed comments she said she originally provided to the Board of County Commissioners on 12/15/09 regarding the reasons why a strong neutral peer review should take place before this issue moves forward. She has concerns about Clam Bay studies done recently and work being proposed. Mrs. Marcia Cravens, President, Mangrove Action Group stated their mission to monitor the entire Pelican Bay Conservation Area and ecosystem. She refurred to the County's Growth Management Plan and policy 1.1.4 that states the appropriate County agency should continue to work with private organizations such as the Mangrove Action Group. She presented the Mangrove Action Group's commissioned and paid fur Independent Peer Review by Harold R. Wanless, University of Miami. She requested this Board accept the Harold R. Wanless peer review under agenda item 6 A and vote to recommend it as the Services Division' s choice of review of the Post Buckley, Schuh, & Jernigan or PBS&J Clam Bay Analysis, and not address any additional fimding (Jl this issue. Ms. Linda Roth agrees with Mrs. Oaveos' recommendation. The County's recommendations for peer review that include Dr. Dean, University of Florida are not neutral. She recommended Dr. Joseph Donaghue, Florida State University. She distributed infurmation regarding the peer reviewers. Mr. John Domenie said he was a funner member of the Services Division Board fur seven years, but resigned because he does not agree with the County's approach to many issues. Considering the new mangrove growth west of the benn, he questions the study stating water impairment. He does not believ{the PBS&J study is factual. He disagrees with Mr. Dorrill statement made at the December 2009 meeting and quoted, "A political decision has been made and that this Board should discontinue involving itself in issues that are not under its jurisdiction." The decisions made by this board are sacrificing the health of the mangroves for political reasons. Political decisions can be reversed, dead mangroves cannot. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT INDEPENDENT EXPERT PEER REVIEW OF PBS & J CLAM BAY ANALYSIS UPDATE Mr. Darrill said the County Commission approved an executive summary in December 2009 with respect to Clam Bay that took into account the Chairwoman's requested modifications to perfonn an indepcodent peer review. He believes the County Manager went "above and beyond" to ensure that they address this Board's concerns. It is somewhat unusual for two County Divisions to be competing against one another, but the County quickly grasped the idea fur an outside peer 8275 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 lQ',lA9 ~ review. He explained lhere was implied criticism in the way the Pelican Bay Services Division conducted historical water quality sampling. This Board decided in December to as early as next meeting, review, short list, and vote to recommend one individual or maybe the top three individuals to the County Manager to move forward an independent peer review of Pelican Bay Services Division work done historically and work intended this year and the future, and PBS & J report. Mr. McAlpin's Coastal Zone Management is a department within the Public Services Division and Mr. Dorrill intends to speak with Marla Ramsey, Administrator of Public Services for how to solicit resumes of qualified individuals independently. Mr. Iaizzo made a motion lhat lhis Board support lhe Mangrove Action Group's recommendation to accept lhe I{R. Wanless Peer Review. Mr. Moffutt said, "We are talking about doing a peer review with ajointly selected expert. How does that relate to the report you are suggesting we endorse? It seems to me this report is the same kind of report. Does it then take precedence over our own selected expert in doing a peer review? I'm just confused as to why we would we support a report by some other group when we already have in process." Mr. laizzo said the Mangrove Action Group is an independent group and this Board can use lheir peer review to detennine the selection. Madam Chair Womble said, "So this would be in support." Mr. Iaizzo said, "Yes and hope it would have some weight as well." Mr. Dallas said, "Reading it quickly, I like what they are saying but is in direct contradiction to what we are trying to do; we went to this peer review to get politics out of it, as soon as we approve this in any shape or manner, we are right back into politics." Madam Chair Womble clarified lhat lhe Mangrove Action Group paid for and received a peer review by I{ R. Wanless and lhought his professional status comparable or better than anyone else they could come up wilh Mrs. Cravens said lhe H.R. Wanless review addresses lhe controversial PBS&J report and Mr. Ocbs requested that Mr. Dorrill place the issue on the agenda to attempt to get this Board to agree to find an independent individual to do a peer review. She does not know how lhat request apparently was expanded into something else because it really waso't discussed at lhe last Services Division meeting. She recalled this Board discussed addressing the PBS & J report, which has been so contentious and so problematic fur our community. The Mangrove Action Group's mission is to advocate fur lhe Clam Bay System. At Mary Aooe Womble's request, the group submitted peer reviewer recommendations. In addition, the group had already agreed to fimd an independent peer review and the I{R. Wanless report was presented to lhis Board, not as a support 8276 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Snmmary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 I 1 A 9 ... document, but as an independent peer review. Dr. Wanless meets every established and agreed upon criteria He has no stake in this and the review comes strictly from his background and experience. She has shared the PBS&! report with others not involved with doing business with the County and independent consultants see the report is a problem. Kathy Worley of the Conservancy has written a seventeen-page critique. Mrs. Cravens believes Mr. McAlpin tried to rebut Ms. Worley's critique in order to "shore up" the PBS&] report. Mr. McAlpin identified Dr. Dean to perform the peer review more than six months ago and "I assure you the research that Linda Rnth has done indicates how problematic that would be. You have it in your power to accept this review and not expend any more money from the people of Pelican Bay. I guarantee you that if you do not accept this report then Mr. McAlpin will find a way to end up hiring Dr. Dean. Madam Chair Womble said the peer reviewer selection is to be a cooperative situation. If Mr. McAlpin chooses Dr. Dean without this Board's approval, then the cooperative agreement would be off the table. That is not likely to happen right now because it now is not a good time to pull such a political stunt. The report is certainly very positive, but at this time, we need to continue in the furmat we voted on at the last meeting with Mr. McAlpin and jointly decide upon a peer reviewer. I do appreciate the Mangrove Action Group's proactive actions intensely, but I also appreciate the situation that we are in politically and I would like to continue at this time with the positive attitude that we will find someone together." Dr. Raia said, "I would like to amend Mr. Iaizzo's motion in that this Board's suggestions to the County include Dr. Wanless' peer review." Madam Chair Womble said Dr. Wanless could certainly be on the list. Dr. Raia said as far as Dr. Wanless' completed report, "we can accept that separately and the County can look into it if they want to. It has nothing to do willi offering Dr. Wanless as our peer r~view person." Mr. Moffutt said, "What I dm't understand is why the Mangrove Action Group did not submit the report directly to the County Commission." Mrs. Cravens said, "We wile' Mr. Moffirtt said, "Under separate business." Dr. Raia said, "Because the County won't listen to" the Mangrove Action Group. Mrs. Cravens said, "It is not a separate issue though. This review will go to every entity that has any decision- making powers over Pelican Bay and the Clam Bay Natural Resources Protection Act area or NRP A. I feel you are missing an opportunity here to be proactive toward your community. I don't think the residents of Pelican Bay will appreciate that you are spending more of our non-ad valorem assessment for an additional peer review." 8277 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 Ib, 1 A9 .""<llIi Madam Chair Womble said "'We did agree to a certain process and we are going to have to go through that process. Can we pnt this person on our short list'? Of course. If you are going to submit this report to the County, they will have the information, but at this time, I do not think we can actually vote on a motion. We need to go through the process that we already voted ou and agreed to, which is to find a peer reviewer jointly with Gary McAlpin arv.I. Coastal Zone Management department. Dr. Raia said "I thought that we are going to participate in that process." Madam Chair Womble said, "We are." Dr. Raia said "So, we are offering Dr. Wanless as our person." Madam Chair Womble said, "That's not what the motion was." Dr. Raia said "I amended the motion. John do you accept tbe amendment'?" Mrs. Crnveos said "Can I point out that I started out my public speech here by referencing Collier County's Growth Management Plan? COUDty agencies will wml< with private natural resource and environmental org,mi.,ations to do this kind of thing. I am asking you to support the Growth Management Plan and I cited the policy for it. You absolutely have it in your power to do this. Thank you." Mr. MolIall said, "I guess all that does is confuse the issue quite fumkIy. I would like to make one correction of what was just said. I believe that from what I beatdat the last meeting, Mr. Dorrill wemto Mr. Ocb,;and proposed a peer review of a jointly selected consultant to tJy to bring about a resolution. To submit a different report out of left field, whether it is 100% accurate or oot., jost clouds the issue again. We have to get some kind of agreement between Mr. McAlpin's group and our group to move Ibis thing forward. They have a management plan that is going to come down from the Coastal Advisory Committee to manage Clam Bay_ We want to be with the people that do that and we are not getting any closer by continuing to throw stones. We have got to Iiod a way to work \~, demonsttate oor r~bility, and convince them that yes, we can continne the good work we have done for the past ten years." Mr. Crnveos said, ''I'm somewllat concerned over procedural matters. The term jointly select can be interpreted to mean a number of different things. Jointly select, as I understand it means that both parties agree on whoever is selected to do the peer review_ If we submit a list as opposed to one individual, does this mean we in turn receive a list from Mr. McAlpin with the same mnnber of individuals and then negotiate? The procedures involved here have not been explicitly set out before us. Mr. Dorrill talked about a name and then be said Illa}'be a short list. I do not lbink that whatever agreement was reaehed really specified the procedure. Sbonld we come up with one indMduaI? If we should, I see no reason why Dr. 8278 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes Jannary 6, 2010 16 , 1 A 9 , Wanless would not be a good recommendation, but if we are to provide a list, do we know what the procedure is, or is it even set?" Mr. DoIrill said, "TIley are not. As I explained at the beginning of this, lbe procedure will be determined in lbe discussion with my counterpart in lbe Public Services Division, Marla llam>ey, before the eru:! of the week. Mr. McAlpin works for Ms. Ramsey and Coastal Zone Management is a department wi!bin the Public Services Division. Mr. Cravens said, "Well this to me seems like a vel)' poor agreement. We entered into lbe agreement and no procedure was specified and now the procednres are going to be specified by a meeting of administrators and this Board is not going to have any control over it. We are going to be told what we have to do after we have already voted to do something. I think it is vel)' poor planning. Mr. DoIriIl said, "That certainly wasn't the intention. Ilbink this Board made it clear by unanimous vote at lbe last monlb's meeting lbatyou will select our number one, or number one, two, or thirdrdllked firm, not staff The staff is going to work out lbe parameters for how we are going to solicit interest and forward that to you and I consider lbat to be routine staff work, not a policy decision by an advisol)' board." Dr. Raia said, "If I uru:Ierstand correctly, the staff is going to present the slate and then we are stnck with picking one of lhat slale, is thai what you are telling me Mr. DoIriIl said no. Dr. Raia said, "TIlen why can't we just go ahead and accept Dr. Wanless. If the Conoly accepIs him then lbere are no more problems. If they turn him down lben we have 10 find someone else. Mr. Dallas said, "I don't know abontyou guys, but I doo't feel I'm anywhere near in a position 10 vote on anybody today. I would like to come up with some names and, diSlribute them through !be office so we will not break any Sunshine laws. We should get some background on people like this, Mr. ~ I>t whl>mel>Ci, st) we can be chewing on it this month and when we come back next month, we can actually come up with a list and decide whom we want to recommend. We do not have enough information to make any recommendations at this poinl. Mr. laizzo said, "TIle wOlk has been done by the Mangrove Action Group." Mr. Dallas said, "The Conoly sees them as a biased group." Mr. lai7.zo said, "The Mangrove Actinn Group has put in a lot of effort and what we failed to pick up on is we're not doing our job either." 8279 Pelican Bay Services Division Boord Regnlar Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 , I A9 MIl Madam Chair Womble said, "John I don't think we are failing to pick up on it I think everyone is more than thrilled with the report, however we have a process in motion, we voted to go wilb it, and I do not believe we are going to have people crammed down our throats, I will not allow that to happen, but what I will do is work with the process that we agreed to, We voted unanimously to go with having staff talk with staffand discuss how to go forward, When Mr, Dorrill comes back to us at the next meeting or if desired, maybe we can set up anolber meeting before February," Mr, Cravens said, "Madam Chair I respectfully disagree, The motion we voted on did not specil)- that we would allow staff to determine a procedure to make a recommendation, That was not part of the motion," Madam Chair Womble said, "We are supposed to be working together on names and I think what they would be expected to do is figure a way for us to go furward. If you're not happy with it, Tom, we can change it as part the process." Mr. Cravens said, "I'm not sure that we can if Mr. Dorrill comes back with a procedure he agreed to with Marla Ramsey. I'm not sure we're in a position to say we don't want to do that." Mr, Dorrill said, "llbink the procedure in general is going to be very similar to if not identical to the way you selected our finn, Within the County's purchasing ordinance and procurement rules, there are procedures in place pertaining to the selection of a consultant and that is in essence what is going to take place here. Th...e will be some lype of request fur proposals, Everybody and anybody, including Dr. Wanless, by law, bave an opportunity to submit their interest for consideration. Then you are going to be provided with infurmation about all who expressed an int...est. In turn, someone within the Counly Manager's agency will come up wilb a set of individuals and at some point this Board and Mr, McAlpin's department will negotiate who the review... is. The Counly Commissioners would arbitrate the decision if a mutual one cannot be reached. Mr. Cravens said, "With all due respect Mr. DorriIL I voted for you as our management I thought your presentation was outstanding. We were provided, the Board, with the choice between yourself and Mr. Petly and to me that was not very much ofa choice, You far exceeded Mr. Petly's qualifications in my feeling, but I would have liked to have seen a whole lot more, bot I did not." Madam Chair Womble said, "Tom, your point?" Mr. Cravens said, "My point is the Board sItonld be involved in this process in determining procedure and we are not. We voted unanimously to jointly select but we weren't told the procedure would be determined at a later point in time and then given back to us." Madam Chair Womble said, "Do you have a suggestion on how to go forward?" 8280 Pelican Bay Services Division Boord Regnlar Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 f 1 A9 ,,,..,-'11I Mr. Cravens said yes. "I have a suggestion on how to go forward. If we need to do it next month, that's fine, but let's only submit one individual and let this Board be given a bunch of individuals from whom to select and let this Board make the decision." Madam Chair Womble said, "I believe that's what Keith just said to do." Mr, Dallas said, "I don't know if it was one or two, but I'd like to see some infurmation from whomever is suggested, see their backgrounds, what they've done, and be ahle to think about it, and next month, hash it out." Mr, Gibson said, "If we go with this report, we have had no involvement in lbe decision-making process and I want some involvement, not selecting someone else's project, albeit well respected and well assembled. I think we owe that to the community. We need to make our own minds up. I do anyway." Mrs, Cravens said, "Can I just comment here, Quite frankly when you are dealing with G3l)' McAlpin and Coastal Zone Management departmeot, you give him a month, you are going to be hamstrung. I want to point out that the purchasing policy that was cited to you is not correct. A project must cost $50,000 before competitive bidding is required. You can choose anyone you want" Mr, Dorrill said, "I lbink what I said was in all probabilily the process would follow the same lype of purchasing process which means there will be a public request fur qualificatioos. In this case, anybody and everybody are free to submit their name fur consideration based on the quaIificatioos !bat they have and you then are entitled to see all of them, , including the two individuals mentioned, who are unfortunately now tainted for two entirely different reasons, And to make your decision accordingly and hike that ball over to the County or fumble !bat ball over to the County and see if anybody picks that up and runs with it," Mr. Cravens said, "Madam Chair I'd like to call for a question on the motion." Madam Chair Womble asked, "Would you like to expound on what you are calling for?" Mr. Cravens said, "I want to vote on the motioo!bat Mr, laizzo made and Dr, Raia amended. I think that the motioo will prohahly fail, but I think !bat we have spent enough time on this issue and we are not going to resolve it and I would like to get it off the floor. I would be supportive of it, I don't think it's going to pass but I'd like to get it off the floor and move on." Dr, Raia said, "At this point I would consider withdrawing the motion. I have worked with the Mangrove Action Group for a long time and have the utmost faith in their recommendatioo, so I could easily vote for it. I appreciate the concerns by other members of this Board who may not have the experience, and if they fuel they would like to have more 8281 Pelican Bay Services Division Boord Regnlar Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 1611 A9 - personal knowledge I would go along with Mr. Dallas. That said, let's put this on the agenda, we already stated the purpose of it. We will have a slate of candidates and anybody can contribute to that slate and they will be discussed here and then we will come up with a recommendation." Mr. Dallas said, "I suggest we get it early, so we have sometime, Let's not do it just before the meeting, so we don't have time to react, but if we could get the materials with some time to think about it." Mr. Cravens suggested at least two weeks prior. Mr. Gibson said, "You may want to have a special meeting of some kind, if in filet what Marcia is saying is accumte and I believe she is right. Some kind of an expedited," Mr. Cravens said, "Ted, you really can t withdraw lbe motim, you made the second. John made the motion and John, you have to approve the withdrawal." Mr, Iaizzo said, "I withdraw the last motion I made, however, the Mangrove Action Group has done me hell of a job and if we can't accept what they are saying in providing this Board with the information that we need to move ahead on lbe mangroves and Clam Bay, then we've got our heads you know where." Madam Chair Womble said, "John I think I have to agree that we need a little more time to peruse this and maybe take a look at some oflbe olber things lbat he has done. I agree the Mangrove Action Group is extremely professional actually in the way that they handle things. I'm sorry Marcia at this point, I can't give you any more time. John, Are we withdrawing that motim? Okay thank you," Mr. Iaizzo said he wilbdrew the motion. Dr. Raia said there was a comment made that needs clarification,' ;'Mr. Moffiltt, you said the Coastal Advisory Committee is coming down with a management plan and if we don't cooperate wilb them we may not be included in administering that plan, is that correct?" Mr. Moffiltt said, "Almost, I dido't say cooperate with them, I said they will come up with the plan and someone will be appointed to manage Clam Bay. That's what the Clam Bay Advisory Committee was going to do, Since it sunset, the Coastal AdviSOl)' Committee will now do il. I said we need to demonstrate to whoever makes the decision that we are responsible individuals who are capable of continuing to manage Clam Bay, And right now, the Commissimers will tell you we are not, so we need to change our behaviors.'l Dr, Raia said, "The Commissioners will tell you we are not cooperating with them the way they want to do it. We have already demonstrated our abilily to manage Clam Bay. I don't want anybody to accept de facto that Coastal Advisory 8282 Pelican Bay Services Division Boord Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 I 1 A9 .... Committee is going to prepare the management plan that may include dredging and opening up waters and flushing and everything else. That is the issue, We want to be there to make the plan. Mrs. Cravens said, "May I just point out there will be a Coastal Advisory Committee meeting between now and the next time you meet and you can bet your bottom dollar that Mr. McAlpin will use that meeting to try to further his agenda, including his desire to use Dr, Dean. So, I'm sorry." Madam Chair Womble said, "If we are not in agreement with Dr. Dean it does not happen. If it does happen, then there's a political situation on the floor at that point and I think that's going to be a different situation all together. At this point I fuel that we need to go ahead and do the positive with the process, Mr. Dorrilll don't see anything aWl)'with you discussing wilb Marla Ramsey." She directed Mr. Dorrill to report to the Board inunediately following his meeting and inform how it looks like they might be proceeding, If the Board members have concerns, lbey can express lbem at that time. She asked Mr. Dorrill ifhis meeting with Ms. Ramsey is scheduled. Mr, Dorrill said no, "I plan to have that scheduled by the end oflbe week." Madam Chair Womble said, "If you could get that taken care of and then get hack to us with what you have come up with then we can make suggestions if we have concerns." Mr. Cravens said, "Mr. Dorrilll have a question. From what Mary Anne was just saying, it appears that she feels this Board has a right to veto any selection made by Mr. McAlpin that we don't approve of, is that correct?" Mr. Dorrill said no. Mr. Cravens said, "Does Mr. McAlpin have a right of veto over anyone that we might select?" Mr. Dorrill said no, "As I indicated, in the event that we cannot .';en jointly determine who would be an appropriate individual, then I presume then we would go back to the Counly Commission who delegated to us that responsibility to us jointly and let them try to arbitrate that matter, As are most lbings within the authority that we have, the County Commissioners are the end authority." Mr. Cravens said, "Okay, Thank you." ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT Mr. DorriII said, "You will see attached the monthly financial statement in its improved furmat coming directly from the County information that is maintained by the Clerk who is the Counly's chief fiscal officer, A couple of quick observations where at lbe end of the first quarter of the fiscal year in the month ending December, on the good side, there is 8283 Pelican Bay Services Division Boord Regnlar Session Summary Minntes January 6, 2010 16 I 1 A9 .. $2.5 million dollars in cash and short term investments and equivalent instruments where the Clerk puts your money in; Against only $133,000 in payables for that particular monthly cycle. Turning to the income, there is one thing that caught my eye that I thought was interesting to note. I would have hoped lbat by the end of the calendar year lbat we would have seen a little more money in those noo ad valorem special assessments. You can see that there is about $500,000 budgeted receipts that were not paid by the first quarter. What that means to me is that people are not going to be able to claim lbat on their personal income tax return as a deductible. That's a little higher than I would have thought, but that may be a reflection of commercial properties, or for whatever reason, not wanting to take advantage of the discount or individuals for whatever reason chose not to pay their tax bill before the end of the calendar year, They have until April, as you know to pay it before lbey are delinquent. I fuund one and lbere are other miselassifications. He asked Mr. Lukasz to provide the Board with details. "If you turn over to lbe last page of the income statement, I'll show the one that I found, Because Kyle looks at this every day, I want him onlbe record to tell you a couple of the others that we will be working on to make sure they are reclassified. If you look under capital improvements, and specifically right of way beautification that subtitle there under automobiles and trucks you'll see that we budgeted $26,000 for lbe year but in that second column, in the year to date column, you'll see that we actuaIly speot $41,000. That's because they also misclassified a purchase, put it under vehicles, when that particular purchase should have occurred under lbe next item, which is other machinery and equipment. If you add lbose two together we would still be under budget That's because somebody in bookkeeping inside of the Counly administration, simply misclassified that purchase order against the vehicle line item as opposed to the equipment line item. That's why that particular item would show as $15,000 over budget. We will be working over the COurse of the next month to correct that one and lbere are at least two other mistakes that we found. Arid again I think the good thing about it in our new format on the income statement side, we are able to quickly see where mistakes have been made, or where our actual speoding and our revenue receipts are occurring on a much better basis than the sort of historical information that you have been given. Kyle if you could touch on the other two and then we'll see if they have any questions," Mr. Lukasz said lbe other two lines were under community beautificatioo, right of way beautification category and one was under fertilizer and herbicides, You can see there was $58,500 budgeted and to date the expenditore is $46,000. That is about $15,000 posting that needs to be entered under water management. In addition the number looks a little high, for instance we did two ferti1izations oflbe ornamentals and we've already done one of them, so 50010 of the prodUCt, we already purchased as well as the initial torffertilization is done, Once the posting is changed, taking into account the fertilization that takes place in October that number will be in line, The other one was under tree trimming are actual 8284 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16111 A9 expenditures for trimming the Sabal palms done in October, the beginning of the fiscal year. We contract out the portion of Saba! palms that we are not able do in-house. The trees where someone has to climb or we don't have the equipment to reach some of those areas. It is the same with the invasive vines and sea grape trinuning that took place on the U.S. 41 berm, Mr, Levy asked Mr, Lukasz ifhe said part ofthe tree trimming should go to another category. Mr, Lukasz said, no, not the tree trinuning, that was under fertilization and herbicides. Mr. Levy asked if the tree trimming work for the year was complete and if that category is $6,000 over budget. Mr, Lukasz said yes. Some of the work, the Sabal palms, the trees, invasive vines, which has to be done otherwise it becomes a bigger job. Mr, Levy asked overall how they are doing. Mr. Lukasz said the other line items are in line with expectations, Mr, Durrill said lbey are doing very good overall, He believes this report to be good because it is the end of the first quarter, which is a busy quarter 00 lbe landscape side of what the staff does here. He is very pleased as lbe manager with the new format and that the Clerk is working with us, no one else in the County and lbey spend a billion dollars down there, looks at an income statement. It's astounding, The Counly's system is good for budget recording but "I can tell you, you have more financial knowledge and presentation than lbe Board ofCounly Commissioners or any Counly division," They have made some progress and he thanked the Clerk's Finance Director, Crystal Kinzel fur providing. Mr. Levy asked Mr. Dorrill iflbey frontload the charge, under indirect cost reimbursement, water management because lbe budget is $117,600, actoal is $10 I, 122. Mr, Dorrill said yes. Mr. Lukasz said they take it out upli'ont and he is not sure why the number is less than the budgeted $1 17,600. Mr. Levy said lbey might under run that category. Mr. Lukasz said the Infurmatioo Technology (IT) category indirect charges would be taken out quarterly. Mr. Levy asked iflbe Board would receive a financial report for the street lighting category. Mr. Dorrill said the Clerk is providing this preferred format financial statement of the prim3l)' operating fund by exception, but he is happy to request the report for the street lighting fund, Mr. Levy said the Budget Subcommittee could discuss financial reporting at their February 10 meeting. Mr, Durrill asked if there were questions and there were none. He requested the Board vote to accept the unaudited financial statement as presented. 8285 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 I lA 9 .... 1 Mr, Dallas made a motion to accept the financial report as presented. Mr, Gibson seconded. Madam Chair Womble referred to the Budget Subcommittee members to accept the report as presented and the consensus was affirmative. The Board voted on the motion and approved unanimously. M,. DaJ/as IIIIUle II modon to IIlXt!J1I the jbuJndlll report lIS presented. Mr.. Gibson secmuJed. MtuIam ChIli, Womble deferred to the Budget Subcommittee members lIS to whether they IlCcept the report lIS resented. The consensus WIIS 1'IItIItiw!' The BOIlI'd voted on ~ modon IlIUl roved~. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: EQUAL EMPWYMENT QPPORTUNI1Y COMMISSION COMPLAINT Mr, Dorrill said there is a Services Division employee that filed an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) discrimination complaint The employee is a grouodskeeper and the nature of his concerns are he is being harassed by other employees of his same culture, questions the County's job verilYing employees' immigration status, and safety concerns with vests and a safety issue regarding a seat on a Iawnmower that he uses routinely, The employee met with Mr, DoIriIl, some issues were address, but the employee did not file a formal grievance wilb Mr. Dorrill or with the Services Division/County. The EEOC complaint is pending review for probable cause and he will keep the Board apprised. CHAIRWOMAN'S REPORT Madam Chair Womble said there are four vacancies fur seats on the Services Division Board. There are two sitting applicants, Mr. Moffatt and Mr. Hansen and she affirmed both current members are interested in reapplying. Mr. Cravens said the community would determine new members 'fu the election and fuund lbe discussion and making a recommendation inappropriate. Mr, Dallas agreed. Mr, Hansen agreed, He asked, "Why did we initially approve the agenda, and when we get to an agenda item, we disapprove of it?" Mr, Cravens said that maybe there was some aspect they were not aware, Mr, Hansen said, "It says right lbere." Madam Chair Womble explained historically the Board has approved discussed applicants and made recommendations to the Commissioners, however, lbe process is in the straw vote phase, and no vote has been taken, 8286 Pelican Bay Services Division Boord Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 1611A9 "'AI( Mr, Cravens said ifmemory serves, historically, the recommendatioos made by the Services Division Board were for appointraents to the Board that did not involve the voting process. Mr. Levy said he agreed the discussion is inappropriate. Mr. Hansen said, "I agree with that, but in my opinion, in some cases this Board is willy nilly on everything we do, We approve an agenda on 1he third item, and then we get down to number six or seven and 'whoops, and by the way, this shouldn't be on the agenda' so I just think it's kind of funny that we do that," Madam Chair Womble said at this point, the Board should recognize lbere are Board vacancies and people are interested in becoming members. She asked if any applicants were at today's meeting and acknowledged Mr, JoIm Domenie and Ms. Linda Roth. Ms, Linda Rolb was in the audience and announced she has withdrawn her application. Madam Chair Womble said olber applicants who were not in attendance, Dr. James Halikas and Mr, John Baroo, General Manager of Waterside Shops, When she called his name, Mr, John Chandler stood up. Mr. Chandler acknowledged being a candidate and said, "My application is still active." Madam Chair Womble acknowledged Mr. Moffatt and Mr, Hansen. No recommendatioos were made and there was no further discussion about Board applicants, She added the Board should be more careful reading 1he agenda before they decide to approve it. Mr. Cravens said lbe Board could congratulate Mr. Hansen, Being there two conunereial vacancies and only two commercial candidates, no election would take place. Madam Chair Womble announced properly owners would be receiving a ballot by mail, to vote and mail back the ballot. SIte explained the vote is more of a straw vote, and they will receive a ranking of applicants by who received the greatest number of votes. Then, the Commissioners will determine who is appointed, but historically the Commissioners have considered the community's electoral process to make their decision. Mr. Levy agreed, Mr, Iaizzo said, "Except when it goes back to the list, they will choose from 1he list, meaningtbat if we don'tbave a contender, they will go to lbe list and make a selection." Mr. Levy said he believes the Conunissiooers have always taken into consideratioo what this Board recommends first. 8287 c A () I Pelican Boy Services Division Board Regnlar Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 1'''1 Mr. Cravens said they have always followed the process lbat if a vacancy occurs, they appoint in succession of who came in next on the list, Madam Chair Womble asked when the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association is holding their "Meet the Candidates" night The consensus was accurate and January 19 at 7 p,m. Mr, Cravens said the only requirement to vote was being a properly owner in Pelican Bay, Mr. Moffatt asked Madam Chair Womble for the appointmeni process timeline and who administers tallying. Considering lbe strained County budget, would they still go through the process, adding that the Counly let go another dozen employees yesterday, January 5. Madam Chair Womble asked Ms, McCaughtry to explain the process, Ms. McCaughtry said today the names of applicants were submitted to the Clerk of Courts by Ms. Sue Filson, the Executive Manager to the Boord of County Commissioners, The Clerk will prepare the straw ballot and provide the date they are mailed, An executive summary with the date the ballots were mailed will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Ballots have to be retorned before lbirty days and the Clerk will tally. Madam Chair Womble asked if the ballots are sent before the term expiration date of March 31. Ms McCaughtry said yes. To her knowledge, the Clerk will mail the ballots before the end of Jannary, The Board of County Commissioners expect to appoint Services Division Board members at lbeir February 23 meeting. Madam Chair Womble expressed concerned about the tight schedule. Ms. McCaughtry said the Clerk could be ready to mail in two weeks. Mr, Moffatt asked iflbe Clerk mails a list of names. Ms. McCaughtry said yes, there is a list of names with instructions of how many names to mark, mailed back to the Clerk and they compile lbe numbers. Madam Chair asked if the candidate list is complete, Ms, McCaughtry said yes. Mr, Cravens asked what the candidate withdrawal deadline is. Ms, McCaughtry said there is an application deadline and there have been instances where a candidate has withdrawn after the ballots were printed but there is no withdrawal deadline. Dr, Raia said he is certain the ballots have not gone to print, and Ms. Roth's name will not be on the ballot. 8288 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regnlar Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 , 1 A 9 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN UPDATE BY VICE CHAIRMAN DM.I.AS Madam Chair Womble defurred to Mr, Dallas because she was unable to attend the December 21 Community Improvements Plan workshop. Mr. Dallas said briefly they discussed short-term crosswalk solutions, which was the same information provided by Mr, Mangan at the beginning oftoday's meeting. They discussed long- term crosswalk solutions for the North tram station eight, which included moving the turnaround to opposite the driveway instead of the middle of the street, put in pavers, and other elements that would bring a higher visibility to the crosswalk. They talked about main drag roadways and various lane widths and configurations, i,e., lanes are currently twelve fuet wide and if a bike lane is considered the car lanes would reduce to ten fuel wide with a four-foot wide bicycle lane. They discussed pathway widening from five to eight feet and the understanding that not all would be widened, not all done at the same time, and in some instances, there would be physical restraints allowing only the possihility to widen pathways on one side of the street. They discussed intersection structure to be more friendly to people and pedestrians with landscaping and markings. Suggestions were made to install a roundabout at Gulf Park Drive and Pelican Bay Boulevard, Lots of discussion ofwhelber the ideas are good or bad ones, There will be more discussion about traffic and pedestrian safuty concerns, as well as possibilities in the space available, They discussed widening the berm without causing problems with people falling off the edges and possible outlook areas or platfurms where water passes through or ugly areas, Discussion of entryway siguage and ways to make subtle improvements, including paving entranceway lanes. Mr. Gibson said he believeS they are doing a good job conveying Communily Improvements Plan infurmatim to the community, but asked if there was any way lbey could prevent a revolt. Mr. Dallas said he agrees they are communicating well because he has attended several Men's Coffee meetings recently and bas spoken with people he did not know and lbey seem to be somewhat aware of what is going on and reaction is positive generally, People in the community are asking the same types of questims that most everyone here is. Mr, Mangan said they are infurming the communily through many communication charmels. Mr. laizzo said every effort has been made to communicate, The response has been poor. Mr, Gibson agreed. Mr. Cravens agreed, but added he did not expect it to be much better. They will have to "do" something to get a response. 8289 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regnlar Session Summary Minntes January 6, 2010 16 f i A 9 Mr, Iaizzo asked if they aren't getting a response, then how they will get feedback. Would lbey develop a surveyor referendum, Mr. Cravens said when the ideas are final with costs attached, they should solicit a response by surveyor vote. Mr. Moffatt agreed that one a cost is associated, the community will respond, Mr. laizzo suggested a personal mailing "and iflbey don't respond at that point it's over." NOTICE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Madam Chair Womble announced upcoming Communily Improvements Plan meetings, including the January II town hall or educational meeting to the community at 2 p.m. and 7 p,m.; January 26 at 2 p.m. ~ 4 p,m, is a joint Board and Strategic Planning Committee workshop to discuss the 90010 Design review and stressed this meeting's importance. On Thursday January 14 at 8:30 a.m. there will be a site walk with the connnunily from the north tram station to the sandpiper tram station, Mr. Dorrill said due to the difficulty of recording and transcribing the community site walk it is not a publicly noticed meeting. He cautioned that if more than one Board member attends, they should not lead or hold a discussion about anylbing that may come before this Board at a future meeting, Madam Chair Womble asked Ms. Resnick to post the meeting information on the Services Division web site and added, "which by the way is absolutely coming along beautifully. Thank you very much." Mr. Cravens said, "Excellent job." Ms, Resnick acknowledged and affirmed, Madam Chair Womble announced the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association's candidate forum, January 19 at 7 p,m" and most likely held at the Community Center h...e in this room. She encouraged lbe audience to telllbeir friends and neighbors about the January I I town hall meetings, at 2 p.m. or 7 p,m. where the Wilson Miller Cormnunity Improvements team will present their ideas and allow for an exchange of idea. 'They like to hear from us, too. Thank you." CAPITAL PROJECTS Mr. Dorrill introduced capital projects, He said the Oakmont lake bank enhancements project is complete. They have solicited a proposal from Hole Montes civil engineering firm to evaluate the south berm for necessary repairs and reconstruction. 8290 Pelicao Bay Services Division Board Regnlar Session Summary Minutes Jaouary 6, 2010 1Q 111 A9 Mr. Lukasz said Hole Montes is performing an initial evaluation of the south berm for reconstruction. The area being evaluated begins at the Commons and ends at the RegisI\)'. They have done the survey work, collected data, and taken core bore samples of the berm itself. Field evaluation and testing is in process and be complete in the next thirty days, Mr, Cravens asked Mr. Lukasz who came up with lbe idea that the south berm was in need of evaluation and reconstruction. From his observations, no evaluation oc reconstruction is necessary. He walks lbe berm frequently and has talked to olbers who do the same and no problem 'jumps out at you." Mr. Lukasz said along lbe south berm it looks like there are speed humps at the weir structures in areas where lbe culvert pipes go across the berm, It appears that there may be some settling of the berm itself. In the initial ride through and from his observations, the Hole Montes engineer does not believe it will be that significant, hut will not know for sure until they complete the analysis. Mr, laizzo asked if Ibis pending work was ever brought before this Board fur approval. Mr. Cravens said he understands the project was approved, but repeated his question. Who decided there were problems on the south berm and !bat money needs to be spent to fix it. Madam Chair Womble asked Mr, Lukasz if weir structures are what need repairing, more than the berm itself. Mr. Lukasz said it appears !bat the culvert pipes are not settling beneath the surface of the berm where there should be sufficient compression, and !bat the berm has some slide settling, Initial observations from the engineer are that it is not that significant. Mr, DorriIl asked if the culvert is galvanized or PVC, Mr. Lukasz said no, they are concrete. Mr. Gibson said from his observations, the north end of the berm, the ditches on either side are in considerably deeper water, The south end of the berm is quite shallow, It is almost if the berm has subsided over the years to where it is not nearly as raised to where the water level should be, hut !bat is something that an engineer should determine, not this Board by making casual observations. Mr. Lukasz agreed and said they are also surveying the swales adjacent to the berm itselffor efficiency and the evaluation will be telling. Madam Chair Womble said this is a proactive sitoation, Doing something small now will prevent a larger problem later. 8291 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regnlar Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16Jlt A9 . . Mr, John Chandler, resident ofSt. Lucia and Board candidate said he rollerblades the entire length of the benn every few days and from his observations, the surface area of the south benn has deteriorated. If compared to the north berm, there are cracks along the surface edges and suggested resurfacing, Mr, Moffillt addressed Mr. Cravens and said participating in any aetivily with wheels, such as rollerblades or golf carts, dips are noticeable. COMMUNITY ISSUES Dr. Raia suggested placing his item under community issues rather lban new business because the top is a community issue. Madam Chair Womble said she agreed, but because they approved the agenda item under "New Business" it should be heard when they get to that point. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND/OR REOUESTS Madam Chair Womble asked Mr. Dnrrill if the budget subcommittee scheduled a workshop in February, She would like the entire Board to meet, so everyone has an opportunity to provide input about new budgeting procedures and reporting, before the committee meets alone, Mr. Donill said that he understands lbere several Board subcommittees, each with several members, but he needed direction regarding how lbe budget subconnnittee has met historically in order to provide advice. If two or more members will be present at any time, whether it be a workshop or meeting, it must be noticed properly as a public meeting, It is the Chair's discretion as whether to hold a workshop in advance or following a budget subcommittee meeting. Madam Chair Womble queried lbe budget committee members. Mi-. Levy and Mr, Moffillt are Co- Vice Chairs, Mr. Dallas, Mr. Gibson, and Mr. Iaizzo. Mr, Levy said they are starting to meet as a subconnnittee a mouth later than last year and he recommends lbey have a working meeting and get going. Mr. Dnrrill needs to be there, too, Madam Chair Womble asked Ms, McCaugh!l)' if a budget subcommittee meeting was scheduled and location. Ms. McCaugh!l)' said yes, the Budget subcommittee will meet 01\ February 10 at I p.m, here at the Community Center in this roorn or one upstairs and it will be an advertised public meeting, so if any Board members would like to attend they can, Mr, Moffillt said they have monthly budget suhcommittee meetings scheduled. Madam Chair Womble asked if there was any other committee reports or requests and lbere were none. 8292 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 It 1 A9 OLD BUSINESS Madam Chair Womble followed up on some items discussed at the December meeting. First item was crosswalk signage at the North tram station, which lbe Board discussed earlier today with Mr. Mangan, The second item was removal of invasive plants and deferred to Mr, Lnkasz for an update. Mr, Lnkasz said on the south side of the berm near Naples Grande, they began maintenance on exotic invasive plants, More exotic-invasive plants are located at the north end of the benn by the Ritz Carlton and the field crew will be addressing the area next. Madam Chair Womble asked Mr. Lnkasz to identilY the lypes of exotic invasive plants along the north and south sides of the benn. Mr, Lnkasz said Brazilian Pepper, Madam Chair Womble said, "Get rid of it quick, thank you." Madam Chair Womble asked Mr. Lukasz ifhe knew the statns ofMr, Hall's water sampling protocol. Mr, Lnkasz said the draft was distributed to lbe Board today. Considering the draft was distributed to the Board today, no one has had a chance to review. Madam Chair Womble showed the draft "Surface Wat... Sampling & Monitoring Protocol" to the audience and explained the Board will be reviewing the updated and standard protocol that Mr. Tim Hall ofTurrell Hall and Associates developed. Mr, Cravens said water qualily data collected by Turrell Hall & ~ociates received criticism for not meeting state standards and not submitted to the state agency. "The criticism that the data was not submitted to the state is correct, however, the data itself was for the most part very valid. The purpose of the draft is to enable data collected can be transmit to lbe state, Mr, Lnkasz said the draft addresses standard protocol for data collection, equipment calibration, record keeping and Department of Environmental Protection training and certification. C1DTently, three Services Division field employees have the required state certification, NEW BUSINESS COLLIER COUNTY & INSTALLATION OF AIDS TO NAVIGATION IN CLAM BAY DISCUSSION Add-on requested by T. Raia Madam Chair Womble gave the floor to Dr, Raia to discuss his add on item. 8293 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regnlar Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 II I A9 1 Dr, Raia attended the Board ofCounly Commissioners December 15 meeting and observed Mr. Gary McAlpin, Mr. David Tomasko, and Mr. John Arceri were allotted unlimited speaking time to report to the Commission. He said Mr. Arceri was very abusive, He said the Commissioners are being fed information by the staff and "our three minute sound bite is not enough to upset that" Dr. Raia is concerned that the Commissioners believe they are acting in good faith, but the information lhey receive to act on in good failb is being provided by "a body that fur some reason or anolber has a vested interest in an agenda that I do not understand." He submitted fur the public record a statement describing this Board's responsibilities by Ordinance, which "until recently" included the maintenance of Clam Bay. The ten-year Clam Pass maintenance permit noted sea grass might be impacted after five years and should be reevaluated, "Leaders in the Seagate communily claimed lhe sea grass was being destroyed." The Counly engaged a consultant to analyze the sea grass which reported positively that sea grass was healthy and water quality good, The consultant expanded Clam Bay to include Venetian Bay, Moorings Bay, and other water bodies and recommend additional water quality studies. The Services Division began preparation to apply for a new ten-year permit. A dispute ensued regarding the requirements to close out the permil. Contradictory information spread regarding Clam Pass being navigable or non-navigable and requirements unclear in regards to installation of lateral navigational markers, informational signs, or just repair existing markers. The County created a new committee to handle Clam Bay issues, effectively taking away the Services Division's Clam Bay responsibilities. The County engaged consultants to reevaluate Clam Bay's water quality. The report was critical of the Services Division's historical water quality data, results fuund lbe water impaired and recommended further analySis. Until recently, the Counly was authorized to install aids to navigation in Clam Bay, however the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission or FFWC rescinded on November 20, He / claimed the FFWC information is not part of the public record. It was repOrted lbe Florida Department ofEnviromnental Protection ruled any authorization to install aids to navigation and regulatOl)' markers are invalid because Clam Bay is too shallow being less than fuur teet deep and the 1998 penoit would be closed, The Board of County Commissioners will discuss on January 26, He said the County's actions raise legitimate concerns, He recommended the full Board provide support and submit questions to lbe County, His statement outlines fuur questions fur the County, The first question is to define clearly what the problem is and propose a solution. The second questions is to explain why the Counly insists on installing lateral aids to navigation in a non-navigable waterway and Natoral Resource Protected Area or NRPA. The third question is does the County plan to use Outer Clam Bay for power boating and perpetual dredging, The fuurth and final question asks if Clam Bay north of Seagate is being considered as a solution to clean up lbe polluted waters south of Seagate. County staff has told the Connnissioners the Coast Guard is requiring the lateral navigation signs, This is untrue. The Coast 8294 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 rt l' A9 Guard is not requiring markers; the Coast Guard regulations state that if markers of any lype are going to be installed, they must meet Coast Guard standards. Red and green navigational markers determine safe passage and must maintain sate passage otherwise not in compliance with Coast Guard standards, The assumption is that the County will install signs that define safe passage, the assumption is safe passage, and the Counly will maintain safe passage however, "anyone that is familiar wilb Clam Pass knows that they are going to have to dredge that Pass almost every month" because it is a shoal area in constant flux, "This is serious business because legally, the Coast Guard is not liable, The Conoty is liable, and if something happms and the COUUly is sued, the County will use that for an excuse to dredge." His purpose for presenting this information is because he believes the Coonty does not have it. He has never heard them comment on it. Dr. Raia made a motion the Board write a letter to the Counly Commissioners and County Manager, incorporating the comments made in his statement. Mr. Levy said in May 2008, staff told the Commissioners that aids to navigation needed to be installed in order to close out the ten-year penoit At the same meeting, they created the new Clam Bay Advisory Committee. He pointed out it was not known until June 2009 that the Army Corp, of Engineers did not require installation of navigational markers, It was over a year before the Commissioners were given accurate information, acknowledging it was because Dr. Raia received in writing from lbe Army Corp of Engineers stating closing of lbe permit, did not require installation of navigational markers. Dr, Raia agreed, "It took over a year and threat of a Congressional to get the response I have, but I believe the staff knew that lbe reference in the permit to signs was for regulatory and informational signs, not red and green navigation signs, They told the Commissioners that the penoit was referring to red and green signs, which was so ridiculous because the NOAA charts claim those waters are non-navigable and if anybody ever uS~ those waters, they are just not navigable, just common sense," It took a year to get the official reading, Mr, Levy said everything that Dr. Raia discussed was already being handled by the Foundation. Dr. Raia agreed, but the Foundation's approach would lead to a costly legal battle wilb the County, He said this could have been circumvented a long time ago if "we who represent the people out there concerned about this, had brought this information before the Commissioners." Madam Chair Womble interceded to address the motion on lbe floor. Mr. Dallas said he agrees with lbe facts and Dr. Raia's concerns, however he disagrees with the _ement that because the Pelican Bay Services Division acts as an advisory board to the Board of County Commissioners about lbe concerns of residents in Pelican Bay, He said, "Residents have concerns about oflShore drilling, but I don't think it's our job 8295 Pelican Qay Services Division Board Regnlar Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 1'611. A9 ..... to do it. I think this falls in the same category, The Counly has told us we are not responsible for it. Ifwe start writing letters to them, all we are going to do is infuriate people and ultimately we will end up with less control over Pelican Bay than had we kept our mouth shut, I'd say leave it to the Foundation." Madam Chair Womble said, "Ted, what you have done is exactly what you said you were upset with the Commissioners for, We have all this time to discuss and you only have three minutes for audience participation, which is lypical to what we do at the meetings they have, You have presented your side, you have told us how lbings came down the pike, and we're all sitting here agreeing with you I'm pretty sure, hut this is not the correct forum, I think that is what people have been tl)'ing to point out to you. We can't without being very impolitic do more than we are doing right now. Dr, Raia said, "I'm getting as much out oflbis meeting as I get out ofthe three minutes when I go before the County Commission, but let me address Keith's comment. My comment about addressing concerns of the Pelican Bay residents comes directly from the [prior} Conoty Attorney," David Weigel. He said that this is one of the purposes and would be an opportunity to express concern. You want to bring up offshore drilling. I do not want to trivialize the problems we are having wilb Clam Bay, Can you tell me why they want to put navigation signs in Clam Bay? It does not concern you? Are you going to do anything about it?" Mr, Dallas said it is a concern, but this is not the proper furum to react to it. Dr. Raia queried the audience and received a positive response. He said the residents elected him and he felt obligated to listen and respond to their concerns. "Maybe some of you were appointed and that may be lbe problem because when you are appointed by Conunissioner Halas, you may not feel the ties to the people who elected you and expect you to respond to them because they elected you," Mr, Moffiltt said, "Ted, I object to that categorization, I think it is totally inappropriate. Tom does. Keith does, and Geoff does too," Madam Chair Womble agreed with Mr, Moffiltt and the others, Dr. Raia said, "Wait wait. what is the objection?" Mr. Moffiltt said, "That we do not feel an obligation to the residents of Pelican Bay, what you just said." Madam Chair said, "We are speoding a lot oftime trying to do what we can to help." Dr. Raia said, "Well what are you doing about it by telling me that this is not the forwn, This is not the place. You can't do anylbing about it." Madam Chair Womble said, ''Ted, we met with the Couuly Manager several times." 8296 16 rl f"A9 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes Jauuary 6, 2010 Dr, Raia interrupted and said, "That is a waste of time," Madam Chair Womble disagreed, Dr. Raia said, "I want to go before the Commissioners and let them know what these people are concerned about." Madam Chair Womble said, "Ted, you asked fur an educational situation." Dr. Raia said, "Wait a minute, let's call a vote, let each person express their position on this issue, just go down the line. If you feel that this is not business of this Board, then just express it. As far as I'm concerned, this is definitely the meal of what we're here for, This is probably more important than anylbing else because we don't have any representative government. ~, Madam Chair Womble asked Dr. Raia to repeat his motion. Dr, Raia said the motion is fur the "Pelican Bay Services Division write an official letter to the Board of County Cormnissioners and the County Manager, incorporating the comments made" in his statement.. "It can be a very nice letter, a very respectful letter, but my comments are filets." Madam Chair Womble said from her understanding, the motion was that "we are to do that in support" of Dr. Raia's statement and, "make it clear that lbe Board agrees with your statement." Dr. Raia said his statement would be rewritten in letter furm to the County Commissioners wilb infurmation he feels they have not been receiving and let them come furward to decide whether they will do anylbing about it or not. "The reason escapes me, Providing all this information, why do they insist on doing what they are doing?" Madam Chair Womble said there is a motion on the floor that was seconded. / Mr, Iaizzo said, "Before we go, maybe John [Domeniel wants to Say something? Madam Chair Womble said, "Well actually John cannot at this point. This is not a time for audience participation." Mr. Iaizzo said, "He might be able to add something to that," Madam Chair Womble said, "I know he can," but now is not the time. Mr. Cravens said, "I want to make a comment and this may not draw much favor from anyone. I agree with most everylbing that Ted says in the letter. One major contention that I disagree with and that is that the County Commissioners do not understand what is going on, and lbey are just following lbe recommendations made by staff. I think lbat staff is giving them the lypes of recommendations that they want to receive. Writing them this letter is not going to change in any way the direction the County is going. They know exactly what lbey are doing. Mr. McAlpin and the County Manager's staff, all the 8297 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16' I A9 ~ way to the top, are doing what the County Commissioners want, otherwise they would be directed hy Commissioners to change what lbey are doing." Mr. Levy said, "I also fuel very strongly against installing the red and green markers, and from what I have been reading the Foundation has that totally und... control and lbat those red and green markers are going nowhere, so why do we want to do this? It sounds to me like the Foundation has got them slymied and they cannot move forward on those red and green markers and that they have been shut off' by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection or FDEP, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission or FFWC, He added if the County agency gets approval, they still need permission from the Foundation, He doesn't see the red and green markers project going furward. Dr, Raia said the agencies did rescind the County's authoriwion to install red and green markers, but they can always reapply. "Everyone seems to be missing the point: Why are they doing that?" Madam Chair Womble suggested Dr. Raia might find out by talking quietly to the Commissioners and asking them point-blank. She believes that is a better venue than this Board Dr. Raia said he had spoken with one Commissioner, not Commissioner Halas, but said he did not receive an adequate answer as to why. "There must be a reason why lbey want to do this, I think putting lbe signs there is just an incidental part of it. If they circumvent lbe signs, lbey will go ahead and do it for some other reason. I lbink we are entitled to know why they want to play wilb our Clam Bay. The residents should know our position on this." He urged the Board to vote on the motion. Madam Chair Womble said, "The residents should know that this Board has been stripped of its involvement with Clam Bay and keep that in mind as a political situation." She called fur a vote on the motion. Mr. Iaizzo said, "I'm not finished discussing this. We are an arm oflbe Counly, and the County does listen to us. They don't have to agree with us, hut they do listen. I lbink this is information they should have on their desk to read and understand what we're saying about navigational aids. All we are saying is give them this infurmation. Let them battle with the Foundation, but before they do that hattle, and lbat's going to go on for some time." Madam Chair Womble said, "John, I believe Ted has already given them this infurmation, am I correct, Ted?" Dr. Raia said, "No. The Commissioners know my position on this.. I have lbe written them several letters and I get responses like sour grapes, but I want it at a meeting by an official body, so they have to address it. They ignore me," At the last [Services Division] meeting, you suggested, well, we really support what you are doing, but why don't you try it as a private citizen, I am not on this Board as a private citizen. You want to know politics, It doesn't get done that way," 8298 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minntes January 6, 2010 16 I lA'9 ., Mr. Moffatt said he questioned part of Dr. Raia' s statement, "This will be presented and discussed at the Janu3l)' 26 BCC meeting. I'm not sure what report that is thaI follows the discussion that it is not four feet deep and therefore the signs C3lillOt be pol in." Dr. llaia said the Commissioner would discuss the problem with the FDEP rescinding authorization. Mr. Moffatt said, "If !bat is going to be reported and discussed at the meeting, what more can we add to it?" Dr. llaia said, "Mr. McAlpin, probably John Arceri, or someone will have 15-20 minutes to brier the Commissioners" on another way to circumvent the denial and "we will have three minntes to II)' to rebut. The Commissioners will look al us as nol cooperating, and I know you like to cooperate wilb them, but I want to accomplish something with my tiIne because when I look at these things. \ j\lS\ don't \IDdetSlaNi it. My scientific lIaining tells me 10 question this." Madan. Chair Womble said she questioned what they can do positively along these lines for the citizens of Pelican Bay. She explained thaI this Board is an advisory board to the Board of Counly Commissioners and placed in this position by Ordinance. Another ordinance created !be Clam Bay advisory committee to advise exclusively !be Commissioners on Clam Bay "minus us." No members of this Board were placed on tbat committee. Now that the Clam Bay advisory committee has sunset, the Coastal Zone Development committee is going to take over lbe Clam Bay advisory role. She believes this Board should do what the Commissioners have asked of them and at thi" point in time, "for what you are requesting, Ted, this is the wrong forum. As was brought up, the Foundation is propedy going forward. 1bey have the right to do so. We do not. As you said, we are an arm of the County, so we are able to advise in whatever way we would like to, bul that doesn't mean we are going to take up their time happily with situations they have asked us not delve into." She asked the Board to vote on the motion. The vole was unclear, so lbe Board voted again. Dr. Raia, Mr. Iaizzo and Mr. Crnvens voted in laVOf of \he m<>\\on. Madam Chair Womble, Mr. Dallas, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Hansen, Mr. Levy, and Mr. Moffatt voted against lbe motion. Dr. llaia withdrew the second part of his motion. Madam Chair Womble said, "Ted, I really do lbink !be proper forum is the Foundation." Dr. Raia said, "Let's just drop it As far as I'm concerned, you are abrogating your responsibility" as are the other members of this Board, "hot 1 respect your upinion." Madam Chair Womble disagreed adding she was doing what she conld to help everyone. There was no further discussion and no further new business. 8299 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 Ji I A9 Dr. Raia made a motion for the Pelkan Bay Services Division Board to compose an official letter to the Board of County Commissioners and the County Manager, providing information that incorporates hi, statement regarding the County's rescinded authorizotion to insIlIll aids to navigation in Clsm Bay. The motion was seconded and a vote taken. Dr. Rain, Mr. laizzo and Mr. Cravens voted in favor of the motion. Madam Chair Womble, Mr. DaNas, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Hansen, Mr. Levy, and Mr. Moffatt voted against the motion. The motion faileJ by Board vote of three for and sbc tlI!ainst. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE Mr. DorriII said the Project Status list is a routine document to track and show the status of Board assignments to staff. There is no need for discussion. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mr. Steve Seidel, San Marino at Pelican Bay resident, asked Mr. Dotrill what the C<>mmissioners' agenda is. Mr. Dorrill answered, "I wouldn't have any idea. I played !bat game for eighteen years, but !bat was twelve years ago. I don't have any idea of what ulterior agendas may be in place." Mr. Bob Naegele, spoke as a resident of Pelican Bay_ not as Chairman of the Foundation. He 1hanked lbe Services Division for their past work in solving the mangrove siluation. Hc said !bey were stripped from what was lbeir prim3\)' rcsponsibilily because "no good deed goes unpunished. TIle Fouru:Ialion was banded lbe next round. We would prefer uotto do it, but what choice do we have if we are the last fastening on !be fence. I guess we'll have to play that role. I agree with Tom mentioning Mr. McAlpin is not driving this; it is the Cowlty Coutl.ui.ssionets. McAlpin may be part of the problem, but he gets his marching orders from the Commission. TIle obvious as we go upstream is we have to change the Commission. We need three votes on !bat Commission and !bat has to be the objective of everyone in Pelican Bay. In District 2, we know we have had somebody !bat has fought against us, !be present Conoly Commissioner, at every tom We can't have that in lbe nexl term. We're going 10 have to puIllogelberas a team to elecl!be right person, not a Frank Halas surrogate. That will be our task between now and August 24. He said Jim Hoppenste:odt., S\.~ l'eId\lans and he, me\. ",ith then County Manager Iim Mudd and Leo Ochs on January 27, 2009. He said what was so aggravating is when !bey applied for Water Resources Development Act or WRDA fnnding to !be tune of$250,OOO to study water quality. !bey used the term, "alarming nutrient loading" which impugned everything !be Services Division has done and !be integrily of the stewardship of the residents of Pelican Bay. They asked the COUoly 10 correct the terminology and they were assured the language would be changed. Apparently lbe language was changed slightly to improve Pelican Bay' s posilion, but is slill not adequate. The WRD A application is before Congress in February. If some accommodations are not made, any citizen can go 10 Washington and testify, "we are being jaunned into a secondary position, starting with the Pelican Bay Setvices Division being dismissed 8300 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 rrl~,A'9 from what was a primary responsibility and now having to fight the Conoly on a number of different fronts. So, could that be an issue? I know the County has applied for a $250,000 grant." He thanked the Services Division again, "I know you are all there for the right reasons." Dr, Raia said, "Bob, are you telling me we are being sold out for $250,000?" Mr. Naegele said he believes it is more than that they don't know about, but the application is for $250,000. "I think we are all aware there is a water problem, but to impugn what we have done in Clam Bay and try to group us together with the sewer in lbe north and the sewer in the south is a travesty. It is an injustice from what the original developer did and how we have carried the stewardship on," Madam Chair Womble recognized Ms, Kathy Worley approaching the podium, She said, "Before you say a word, thank you very much from the bottom of my heart and probably from those sitting at this Board, whether they know it or not, you have done an incredihle job for us and you have tried over and over again, never given up the gnod fight, so thank you very much.~' The audience applauded. Ms. Worley, representing the Conservancy made an announcement about an event sponsored by lbe Estuarine Conservation Association regarding Red Tide. One of the panelists is from Mote Marine. It will be held on Thursday, January 7 at La Playa at 7 p.m. Regarding Clam Bay, working for the Conservancy, she knows a little about fighting for the environment. She cautioned wilbout substantial hacking from the Conoly Commission, even when lawsuits are won, they issues always comes back in a different furmat and this is something to keep in mind. She suggested that it helps if "everyone, and I mean everyone, comes to lbe Conoly Commission and just stand up there and say you don't agree with this. You have to put your foot where your mouth is, Do it as an individual citizen, not as a Board," not as a representative of an independent organization because it does help and "sometimes you can win." Mrs, Marcia Cravens, Mangrove Action Group said the WRDA application for $250,000 is fur a hydrological study in line with the PBS & J modeling effort.. She believes it will reimburse lbe County for money already spent on the PBS & J study that she said is a feasibility study for construction. The WRDA proposal includes "lbe study may lead to a need for construction, which is likely to be in the millions of dollars. That is the benefit to Collier Counly. It's not $250,000. It's a great deal more, Ted, I'm sorry that your motion failed. The Mangrove Action Group absolutely agrees with this and it is unfortunate that some of the members of the Pelican Bay Services Division seem to lbink lbey have been stripped of the responsibility for Clam Bay and I can assure you, you are operating under the Ordinance of2006-05. It includes Clam Bay. 8301 Pelican Bay Services Division Boord Regnlar Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16' 1 ,A9 ~ You have not had that ordinance rescinded, or changed in any way shape, or form. You are still operating under 2006-05 and it states that your responsibilily includes Clam Bay, so I don't understand why you are allowing this to be taken from YOlL The residents of Pelican Bay certainly have not voiced their desire for you to abrogate your actions fur Clam Bay, If you allow the Coastal Advisory Conunittee to step in and create a management plan, you are actually violating your ordinance. I just want you to lbink on that, You can shake your head to that, but it's true, Your ordinance is 2006-05 and it states you have a responsibilily for the maintenance of Clam Bay, It has not been rescinded, It is your responsibility," Ms. Mary Johnson referred to the Pelican Bay Services Division website, She said the wehsite states the non ad valorem assessment fur this year and the amount is close to $3 million and among the responsibilities of the Services Division is maintenance and conservation of preserve areas. Acquiescing to what the County wants for political reasons is not in the best interests of the taspayers of Pelican Bay, Ms. Linda Roth as a resident of Pelican Bay said from what she understands, an advisory board is supposed to represent lbe community and then advise lbe County, She doesn't understand why lbis Board is not representing the community and seems to be making decisions based on their own feelings or fear of the County, "The County is incrementally accomplishing their agenda, step-by-step and with each step, we fear if we don't agree with them, they will limit our participation, so eventually you don't have any participation. They accomplish their agenda What is lbe tear? Being threatened by government officials or bureaucrats really bothers me," Madam Chair Womble said, "Do I took threatened? I'm no\." Ms. Roth said no, "but you keep saying we want to make decisions so the County will let us participate in the ten year plan or whatever, if we don't do what they say or keep antagonizing, We" are not agreeing wilb what they say. We have facts and evidence and we should base our judgment objectively. They have their own agenda that they are pushing through. I don't know what their agenda is, but I have my suspicions that it is to improve water quality in Venetian Bay and Moorings Bay." That is why they applied fur the WRDA gran\. Seagate will benefit by deep water dredging fur boating access. Meanwhile the NRP A is destroyed, "I really fear what is coming. They are declaring our water verifiahly impaired. Once it is declared verifiably impaired, the County can plan its own program to do whatever they want in that area. Iflbat's the case, I'd ralber have FDEP come down and do lbe testing and have them declare the water impaired, FDEP will require the County clean up lbe water and it will be costly, If we do have that problem, we don't mind having the water cleaned up, but they are not going to allow dredging and all these olber things, They are making the Cily of Naples remove all the drainage pipes to the Gulf and that is costing millions. I can see it coming. They have PBS&J with two little samples and declare our 8302 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 16 , 1 A9.' 1 water impaired. I'd rather have FDEP come and test and declare Moorings Bay impaired, We were never presented with any data from Moorings Bay." Madam Chair Womble referred to Ms. Worley's comment regarding having many people come as individuals to lbe Counly Commission meeting, stand up and teU the Commissioners how they feel. She thinks that is the best course of action to get lbem to pay attention. She wishes it were different. Mr. Gibson said, "I am one of the quieter members on this Board and feel obliged to ask for a clarification, I am a voter, I understand markers, I'm very protective of Clam Bay in my own mind and lbe main reason I signed up fur this Board, However, I joined the Board after I was told very explicitly that we had been given a major haircut. We had lost political responsibility for Clam Bay. We have the responsibility for maintaining the clarity ofthe water and mangroves, but we have been stripped of that responsibilily. I agree with everything yoo said, Ted, but I feel obliged to speak up that it is the Foundation's responsibility now, The Chainnan is h...e, the president is here, One ofthe confusing parts of living in Pelican Bay is we have the Properly Owner's association, the Services Division, the Foundation, we have so many different Boards of people trying to improve this great communily and we can't lose sight of how great it is. I don't understand what the County is trying to do eith..., but we have to support wheth... we have responsibility fur it or we don't, They can't have two generals fighting the same war from different fronts, I am under the impression that the Foundation has that responsibility and we do not, That's the reason I cast my vote no and I fuel obliged to teU people that Mr. Cravens said, "Geoff, may I make a comment regarding lbat? Th...e is an ordinance passed by the County Commissioners in 2006 that gave us that direction. That ordinance is on the books. It has not been rescinded, We may have been told to back down by County staff, but the County Commissioners ha; not told us that. Madam Chair Womble believes there is a recent ordinance regarding who is responsible fur handling Clam Bay, Dr, Raia asked, "Does that mean we can't express our concerns to lbe Board of County Commissioners? That's the point I'm not denying the authorily of the Commission." Mr, Gibson said, "We've tried that in lbe past, and I don't disagree with anything that you've said, but as I saw it, and well said by our chairperson, that it's not our battle at this point," Dr. Raia said, "Let me get a better understanding of your position, You do not feel you have any responsibility to express yoor concern or the concern of your constituency to the Commissioners about what lbey are doing. I know we can't do anything about it, but I'm concerned that you can express your concern, let lbem know that we as an organization are concerned about what they are doing." 8303 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes Janua..y 6, 2010 16 J 1 A9 --.. Mr. Gibson said, "I think we've done that in spades," Or, Raia said, "How? We have not been able to get anything out by this Board," Mr. Gibson said his purpose for bringing this up is not to rehash lbe issue, We either have the responsibilily or we don't and I was told very explicitly we do not have that responsibility; Responsibility was passed on to the Foundation," Dr. Raia said. "I hope it's an issue during election timC.'l Mrs. Cravens referred to her comments and Mr. Cravens' comments regarding the Board operating under ordinance 2006-05 and suggested the Board members read it, The ordinance states Clam Bay is lbis Board's responsibility and is violating the ordinance by not following their responsibility. Commissioner Henning suggested a year ago fur the Board to form an inter-local agreement between the Services Division and lbe Cily of Naples, which was never done. She said the City of Naples is driving this effort and putting pressure on the Commissioners because they have major water quaIily problems, The only reason lbe Services Division is not engaging in any issues involving Clam Bay is because "they have allowed themselves to be intimidated by County staff In April 2008, the Commissioners voted for the Services Division to prepare, sign, and submit a permit application fur mangrove maintenance and the hydrology of the system. Through political maneuvering, that was never done, "because County staff stepped on you and prevented you from doing it and you allowed it to happen, You are disappointing your community, abrogating your responsibilily. You operate under Ordinance 2006"()5. Please re-read it. You are not doing what you were elected to do otherwise," Madam Chair Womble said lbey were doing as instructed and more recent ordinances layout responsibilily. Or, Raia said, '''The marching orders came from Jim Mudd to John Petly. Jobn Petly told us we have to stop what we are doing because they are not going to authorize any payments fur Clam &y, so don't commit yourselves." Mr. Cravens said the Commissioners should rescind the 2006 ordinance. Mr. Levy said why do lbey want to do lhat? "It could still come back to us. Why shut the door completely? We're taking care of the mangroves." Mrs. Cravens said the mangroves are stressed and lbe Mangrove Action Group monitors the mangroves, no one else. Mr, Levy said, "I thought we hired Tim Hall to monitor lbe mangroves." Madam Chair Womble said Mr. Levy is correct. Mrs, Cravens said the contract is not adequate to address maintenance needed, Mr. Levy said, "It's too bad Tim is not here to commenl."He asked Mr. Lukasz if they were monitoring mangroves, Mr. Lukasz said they are continuing hydrographic monitoring and field observations with Turrell Hall & Associates, 8304 16 I 1 A 9 ...... Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Summary Minutes January 6, 2010 Mr. Levy said Madam Chair Womble agreed they were directed to maintain the mangroves and are doing so. Mrs. Cravens said, "You have approved a $330,000 budget for anwuber of years for anwuber of projects that you and Tim Hall were prevented from doing regarding mangrove maintenance" and perhaps they could respect Kay Potter's work and comments regarding stressed mangroves.. Madam Chair Womble said the stressed mangroves have been addressed and are being monitored. She went to Kay Potter's with Mi. Lukasz and Mi. Hall, made observations. At the last meeting she asked Mr. Hall ifhe still believes the mangroves are stressed from the last round of hurricanes. He is monitoring it. Referring to Mrs. Cravens she said, You were here when Mi. Hall said he dido't feel it to he very concerning, bul he is keeping an eye on it. Yes, Ms, Potter did hring that to our attention back in May and that is when we went" to her apartment and observed the mangroves from above, She is well aware of what is happening and the mangroves are being monitored, She told Mrs. Cravens her public speaking time was up. Mi. Cravens said she had one more item to address, The ordinance that Madam Chair Womble referred to establishing the Clam Bay Advisory Committee was in conflict with ordinance 2006-05 but no one addressed the conflict and severability and feels "if push came to shove" 2006-05 would be supported by lbe State. Dr, Raia asked if they had permission to replace the canoe signs that are in disrepair. Consensus was the signs were in the Services Division's possession, were paid for, but not installed because of Mr. McAlpin's direction to Mi, Hall not to proceed with installation. There was no further discussion, ADJOURNMENT Mr. CrtlVens made a nwtion to adjourn. Mr. DaUus seconded the nwlion. The Board voted unaninwuslv In favor of the motion and the meelint! ad/aurned at 4:12 o.m.. 8305 fl1frtuk.) /, --I AA--' ;1 O/{ L./ 2/X/ID A9/ PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION EDUCATIONAL MEETING TO THE COMMUNI1il811.s1~ MONDAY,JANUARY 11,2010 Halas v' SUMMARY MINUTES Henning Coyle LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Pelican Bay Foundation conducted a public Educationa"llltll* to the Community on Monday, January I I, 2010 at 2:00 PM at lbe Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammoe Drive, Naples, Participants included the following members ofthe Pelican Bay Services Division Board and the Pelican Bay Fonndation Strategic Planning Committee: 1611 Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Boord Members M3l)' Anne Womble, Chairwoman John laizzo Keith Dallas, Vice Chairman Michael Levy Tom Cravens Gerald Moffatt RECENED FEB '9 20Ul _"'OleountY~ Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Members Bob Vek, Chairman Noreen Murray Ronnie Bellone, Co-Vice Chairwoman Pelican Bay Services Division Staff M3l)' MeCaugh!l)', Recording Secretai)' Lisa Resnick, Administrative Assistant Pelican Bay Foundation Staff Jim Hoppensteadt, President Suzanne Minadeo, Executive Assistant Presentation By Kevin Mangan, Principal and Landscape Architect, Wilson Miller Steve Sammons, Sf- Associate and Landscape Architect, Wilson Miller Jeff Perry, Transportation Planner, Wilson Miller Mr. Stewart, Environmental Scientist, Wilson Miller Monique Hall, Wilson Miller Sabrina McCabe, Wilson Miller Patrick Taylor, Wilson Miller Approximately sixty (60) people attended INTRODUCTION Mr. Mangan introduced lbe Pelican Bay Services Division Board, Foundation Strategic Planning Committee, and lbe Wilson Miller Commnoily Improvements Planning Team present. Today's Town Hall meeting will include a brief presentation ahout developing Community Improvements Plan projects followed by an interactive opportunity for audience participation in "break-out" groups. Participants may go to four different "stations" based on their interests to learn about projects under development. Recommendations would improve and enhance facilities, community landscaping, signage, roadways, and community borders and entl)'ways, The study's goal is to develop a strategic master plan for Pelican Bay that has a level of consistency and uniformily, Community feedback and consensus is essential and he encouraged qnestions and comments, He showed the geographical areas included in the study. No private association property is included. The Pelican Bay Services Division or Collier Counly is responsible for approving and paying tor projects on publicly owned land, The Pelican Bay Foundation is responsible for approving and paying for projects on Foundat.}~~pt;i.~\$froperty, Based on ~a!#: L_'J.C\. 64 ii Pelican Bay Foundation Edncational Meeting to the Community Session One Summary Minutes January 11,2010 1611 A9 shared usage, some projects will be approved by both entities and funds appropriated accordingly, The final plan will be the result of community consensus, He invited the audience to participate in the "breakout" session, "BREAKOUT" RECAP Mr. Sammons said that landscaping would be a consideration for many projects, such as street lighting, pathways, and roadways, They are looking to incorporate best management practices, consistency and a noified look communitywide. They should emphasize some locations for high visibility, i,e" announcing crosswalks and at en!l)'ways. Ms. Hall said for safety purposes, pedestrian access should be separate from the parking lot and "backhouse" activities at the North Tram station and Commons, They are looking at signage and way to abate noise. They must be mindful to steer clear of recommendations lbat may cause other problems. Mr. Perry is looking at transportation and traffic improvements, They are observing the roadway travel lanes in terms of who and for what they are being used, There are safety concerns and the potential for accidents between pedestrians, hieyclists and motorists. Their observations will indicate whether to recommend a separation of activities or how to improve a sharing situation, For example, bicyclists and motorists share lbe roadway currently without a separate bicycle lane designation, so reducing the width oflbe travel lanes to designate a bicycle lane may be a consideration. There is a need for consistency amongst crosswalk striping and signage, as well as potential locations to install mid-block crosswalks. Mr. Mangan said as lbe planning process continues, community feedback and participation is very important. He encouraged the audience to complete comment cards and participate in the January 14 Commnnity Site walk. There were no questions, so he said lbank you and concluded the presentation. The meeting adjourned at 3:45 PM. ~ Minutes by Usa Resnick 2/312010 9:19=53 AM 65 16 I 1 F"l_"i~ ~. - I · u;.;.' , ....:..., na . PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION EDUCATIONAL MEETING TO THE COMMUNITY ,,=~tr ~. MONDAY,JANUARY 11,2010 C Itrl ~_ I SUMMARY MINUTES cdifHta ,.'... LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that lbe Pelican Bay Foundation conducted a public Educational Meeting to the Community on Monday, January 11,2010 at 7:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples. Participants included the following members oflbe Pelican Bay Services Division Board and the Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Plauning Committee: Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Board Members M3l)' Anne Womble, Chairwoman John laizzo Keith Dallas, Vice Chairman Gerald Moffatt Geoffrey Gibson Theodore Raia RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2010 Bolllll of eounty (;oIMllIIliQDeI Pelican Bay Foundation Strategic Planning Committee Members Bob Vek, Chairman Noreen Murray Ronnie Bellone, Co-Vice Chairwoman Ralph OhIers Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Lisa Resnick, Administrative Assistant Peliean Bay Foundation Staff Jim Hoppensteadt, President Presentation By Kevin Mangan., Principal and Landscape Architect, Wilson Miller Steve Sammons, Sr. Associate and Landscape Architect, Wilson Miller Jeff Perry, Transportation Planner, Wilson Miller Sabrina McCabe, Wilson Miller Approximately thirty (30) people attended INTRODUCTION Mr. Mangan introduced lbe Pelican Bay Services Division Board, Foundation Strategic Planning Committee, and the Wilson Miller Community Improvements Planning Team members present. He gave a brief presentation ahout developing Community Improvemenls Plan projects followed by an interactive opportunity for audience participation in "break-out" groups. "BREAKOUT" RECAP Mr. Sammons gave a "breakouf' recap about landscaping. Mr, Perry gave a "breakout" recap about transportation, Mr. Mangan said as the planning process continues community feedback and participation is very important. He announced the January 14 Communily Site walk and encouraged participation. He asked if there were questions or comments and there were none. He said lbank you and concluded lbe presentation. The meeting adjourned at 8;40 PM. ~/ ( , /~{ M3l)' Minutes by Usa Resnick 2/312010 9=40:39 AM 66 WilstJnMiller@ ~ Filii C~(~. H. el.. ~ Henning Coyle { CoIeltfl:: v ~I ~J~ 16'1 A9/ RECE\VED FEB 1 9 20\0 f\08rd of county (;oJlI1lIalIIll Pelican Bay Community Improvement Plan January 26,2010 90% Schematic Design Workshop 2:00 to 4:00 pm Agenda Opening Roll Call Communications . Follow up memo to the Strategic Planning Committee . PBSD request to begin to work with Opinions of Cost for FY 2010 Planning . Public Education Event Notices dislributed for February 1 Town Hall Meeting Improvemenl Area Plan and Cost Reviews . Pelican Bay Improvement Area Study Plan . Pelican Bay Boulevard Soulh Entrance . Pelican Bay Boulevard Landscape Before and After . Street Lighting Location and Landscape Resolution Sheet . Proposed Street Lighting Layout Plans - Developing Opinion of Costs . Lighting Options Fixture Sheets . Gardco Sample - Bollard Light Review . Crosswalk Improvements - Developing Opinion of Costs . The Community Berm - Developing Opinion of Costs . Oakmont Park Plans . Ridgewood Park Plans - Developing Opinion of Costs . The Commons Area Plan - Developing Opinion of Costs . Existing and Proposed Signage Location Plans . Review proposed Pelican Bay Heritage Landscape and Public Arts program Inilial Phasing Considerations for Improvement Areas Town Hall Meeting Presentation Discussion MillO. Correa: Wrap Up ;'slll. . .__., !':"d#: Corporate Office 3200 Barley lane Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 _ 800,649,4336 239.649.4040 F 239.643.5716 WllsonMlller.com 16 , 1 A'9 WilstinMiller@ y January 18, 2010 Kyle Lucasz Field Manager, Pelican Bay Services Division Collier County Government 801 Laurel Oak Drive Ste. 605 Naples, FL 34108 Re: North Tram Station Roadway Signing and Striping Sketch Dear Kyle: Attached is the current signing and striping sketch that we have prepared for your use and coordination with the Collier County Transportation Departmenl al the North Tram Station cross walk. We have provided these here for your use directly with the Transportation Departmenl as it is our understanding, based on discussions in past site meetings with you and the Department, that this is available 10 be done through the Operations and Maintenance budget that the County has for such facilities. It is important to note that it is our understanding and recommendation that the three signs that are to be put at the center line between the travel lanes as provided for in the MUTCD, be on a flexible, reflective plastic post and that the sign plates themselves should also be made of reflective plastic and not of a metal backed material. Lastly, while not previously discussed in the field with you but noted last week by one of the residents, is to consider the addition of a no left turn sign placed in Ihe median across from the North Tram driveway cut so that a person does not mistakenly turn north into oncoming traffic, Should you have any questions please give us a call at (239) 649-4040. Kyle we appreciate your help in this area of the community improvement planning process. ~g,,"~ Vice PresidenUPrincipal Encl: Signing & Striping Sketch C: Steve Sammons Jeff Perry Eugene Calvert Steve Yu 3200 Bailey Lane Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 800.649.4336 239.649.4040 F 239.643.5716 WflsonMUler.com 111812010. 216639-Ver: 1.L8EDI N0103-086-002--0 j;::i: z 1J zF 0 m cC/l ;:tI ,.... ~O -l Ci -<~ ::r ~ ~F -l CD .",fn ~ ~ ~;o s:: ' o "' ~ ~ ~ @g i: z n o ~ 6 ~ ~ ;0 en ~ 1 ~ n ,. ~ r 0 ^ 00 _ 00 " ~ '" ~ m , g f ~ ~ m ~ ~ M1 ~ ffi o z < ~ m 00 " m ;'i "' o z ~ ~ o 00 m ~ 5 z 00 ~ m ~!Y8> o ~ m .::: ~ ~ N If ~ r Q o < m ~ /;:~- \\ i \ - < < ;ll or;;;!." 0 ~~(j~ ~i rn w 0 ~~~~ ~~ :(' fflZ(il:J:-<;'ii "il~?iiiii ~:>J ,,~"'ffi ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~:o ~~ ~~~~ ~Q O."X'" ow ~J!a~ ~~ (ilmlO" Of-- ~;!;-" ~;>; ~i~~ d~ ~~~ ~~ ~3 - ~ ~ j;ll;i ;ll:>J ~~~ ~~ ~SgJ ~~ ;>;03 .,,0 21 0 -;<; ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I : \ \ I I I \ I I \ 1 ~l o i i \ \ I 1 ** ~~illz 0 ~~ m~~~ ~~ ffl~~Z c -Ii: Z_l>-a m'" -am(i)m rn ~-I ~~~g ~~ ~~~~ ~ mrn ~~~-l ~(i) -lZ~m ~ ~~ ..~ oo~ n~*~ ~ Z~ ~*~ ~ ~~~ ~ ill O~~ 0 o~m ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ R~8 ~ ~:~ ..., ~G1 Q ~"m lil m:;>:!!! ),: ;:;.. <it ;l:;;d~ ~ ~2g ~ ;:<I~;;d .. ifim~ iii fl1~~ ~ *~g ~ ~C-oi en :;>:02 ~ fi~of;i I ~z~ d n1~~ c: 8 I. I ~ I; I ~ ~ I , c o q 8 8 ; m ."~ olll.... a~~ ~!U Ifii;J ~ < " ~~~i ~ 1--- __J c:--=-===:::::J -" I 16 rIA 9 WilstinMiller@ " To: From: Re: Date: Cc: Bob Uek, Chair Carson Beadle, Chair Ronnie Bellone, Vice-Chair Merlin Lickhalter, Vice-Chair Rose Mary Everett Noreen Murray Ralph Ohlers Mary Anne wom%",_ '''' ' ,~ Kevin Manga~ ~ / Pelican Bay Community Improvement eetings of January 11, 2010 - Follow up report January 18, 2010 Jim Hoppensteadt Steve Sammons Lasl week was a busy week of aclive community involvemenl with the residents of Pelican Bay. The feed back 10 Ihe Pelican Bay Improvement Plans presented in the Town Hall public meetings, the Presidents Council meeting and the Thursday morning site walk discussions proved valuable as a gauge to the important issues of those in attendance as well as providing alternative venues for additional resident input to the process that is now beginning to deliver design solutions for communily improvement. We found benefit from each of the evenls last week providing constructive critical review and input from the community on the work to date. The presentation at each venue, while differenl, was useful and purposeful. This variety was done in a manner that broadly served the public allowing Ihe residents the opportunity to provide us feedback on the developing work while allowing us to respond directly to plan specifics and questions of the improvement planning process. It is worth noting that we believe that there were many first time attendees at both Town Hall events. Given Ihat site level improvement ideas are now developing, the town hall meetings purposefully brought the audience to the work to review this in greater detail with us. The residents' intimate knowledge of specific items of the community and the individual sites was very good and quite engaging. This allowed our team to hear first hand the concerns of existing conditions that do not work for the residents, items of patterns of use and importance as the residents know them in the community and allowed for their immediate constructive comments to the solutions that are being generated. The early improvement proposals being discussed whether traffic, landscape, lighting or facility improvemenls often came with a word of caution as to be careful of over expending for little return of use or value. The following offers by general topic matter both new and reoccurring comments provided by the residents last week. Transportation Pathwavs - Many commented that the pathways need to be "properly" maintained, noting the uneven places in Ihe paths, however that is the common ground of input. Some consider a wider pathway an improvement; some do not, although it we found a slightly more positive understanding in widening. Pathway widening was noted as preferred to the singular alternalive of adding a bike lane on the roadways. 3200 Bailey lane Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 800,649,4336 239.649.4040 F 239.643.5716 1/1912010-216636.Ver: 1 KMANGAN N0103-086-002_ .0 WlIsonMlller.com 16 , 1 A9 ",,'.II Wi/sOnMi//er@ .. On street bicycle use is a topic with passionate opinions on both sides of the issue. Again, some support for narrowing the travel lanes and striping a bike lane, a dual benefit of giving the cyclist a designated lane to ride in, and also slowing the automobile traffic. The negative feedback often recalls this being defeated by the community who generally represenl the opinion that this is unsafe for driver and cyclists. The opinion of allowing the cyclist on the pathways will encourage more cycling and others use of the pathways was voiced. Concern about temporarily stopped/parked vehicies within the travel lanes was voices and frequently used as a reason not to restripe/add bike lane. As a community area, Oakmont Park was singled out as being underserved by pathways in the streets and dark at night wilh poor iIIuminalion cited. Bike Lanes - Some people continue to offer the negative opinion Ihat 10' is 10 narrow of a travel lane, and creates an unsafe condition. However the same will admit that people speed aiong PB Blvd because they feel comfortabie on the nice wide road. Oulside bike riders are seen as undesirable. Adding reflective pavement markers to the solid pathway stripe was suggested as a means of providing a lacliie and visual marker to motorists that might tend to drift into the bike lane if one is added. LoadinQ and Work Zones - Generally negative feelings of temporarily slopped/parked vehicles in the travel ways and turn-lanes; utility company, maintenance vehicles, County trucks, "car carriers" loading/unloading, etc. were expressed. Cross Walks - Unanimous agreement was heard to make improvements in the crosswalks, striving for consistency; no objections 10 adding new mid-block crossings. Some additional comments including improved street lighting/illumination at the crosswalks was provided. A concerned opinion was expressed Ihat the tactile/friction surface to enhance the sensibility of the x-walk may be "too late" if it was put immediately adjacent 10 the x-walk, and suggested further up-stream tactile warning should be considered. Traffic CalminQ and Roundabouts - The workshops provided several objecting opinions to roundabouts/traffic circies/rolaries due to past personal experiences. This concern extended to that people were unfamiliar with them, how they are managed, etc. Traffic SiQninQ - A right turn only sign coming out of the North Tram Station at Ihis time should be considered and added in the median. Long-views in Pelican Bay Boulevard to the North Tram Station internal one way and do not enter signage is ugly and confusing for molorists in the boulevard - consider removing these. The addition of a sign indicating a left turn across/through the median from Ihe north driveway of the Commons and a right lurn only from the south drive of the commons was suggested. General traffic calming was discussed briefly at the Presidents Council session, and roundabout exhibits were displayed, with not much concern expressed. There was general agreement that some intersections (especially Ridgewood at the south end of PB Blvd) need more "operational" attention than others. It was offered that the CCSO has reported that this is the worst inlersection in Pelican Bay with a history of more crashes. 1/19J2010. 216S36. Ver: l-KMANGAN N0103.oa6-002_.O 16 r I A 9 WilsDnMiller@ ~ Siaht Visibilitv - "Overgrown landscaping" causing visibility problems has been reported. There appears to be general agreement and understanding thaI sight visibility is an important issue, both in the R/IN and at private driveways; Consideration and recommendation should be given to how the visibility at driveways issue is dealt with. Team notelWM Observalion - We have noticed Ihal the stop sign exiting the Tierra Mar HOA onto Pelican Bay Boulevard is located after the crossing of the pathway - this sign should be located behind and not in front of the pathway - we will continue to look for other poor placement issues as we continue with our works. Landscape, Lighting and Signage Landscaoe - Lake and Community Berm littoral plantings are seen as an importanl element of future landscape plans to promole fish habitat and wildlife visits to the walers edges. Understand the locations of HOA lands vs. Foundation Lands and PBSD lands with a desire 10 coordinate wilh adjacent HOA's where improvements may make adjustments 10 Iheir surrounding landscape. Many individual HOA driveway areas are a concern for visibility issues between the automobile and those using the pathways. There was a request for sensilivity to endeavor to keep noise and headlights from entering into the individual HOA's areas through the use of landscape. An interest in the use of root barriers to better protecl other hardscape improvements including the palhways was suggested. There was a concern for more sympathetic maintenance of sod at pathway asphalt edges to have a smooth transition and keep from rutting between the two materials. The reduclion of sod in all areas of the rig hI of way was seen as a positive improvement to water usage and landscape maintenance praclices and this was encouraged by many participants. Continued use of color in the landscape was noted with an understanding that this may not be all nalive materials. A note to consider not just native and coastal landscapes but also hurricane proven materials is important. Liahtina - Street lighting should be considered for shifting lights or trimming landscape away from one and other. Consider moving lights to the edges of the right of way in the boulevards rather than in Ihe middle to better light the sidewalk areas at night. The lighling of the asphalt pathway south of San Raphael is needed for use at night. Sianaae - The signage improvements proposals were mel with public responses of keep these improvements simple, a desire to see alternatives from minimal 10 more modifications and also a caution to not add to many signs into Ihe environment. Comments of minimal expense/change at front entry signs however signs on corners (US 41/Pine Ridge & US 41 and Vanderbilt) need improvement and are unseen or unknown by many people. Generally posilive responses offered to the addition of pavers and accent lighting al the main signage areas. A comment of interest to update the Pelican Bay logo was also offered. 1/19/2010.216636. Ver 1 KMANGAN N0103.0Bl).002. _0 16 , 1 A9 WilsIJnMillel' ~ Facilities, Amenities and Community Edges General - Consider number of users and balance against potential costs of improvements of parks. Oakmont Park - A comment of there being no existing facilities for young bike riders on the linear park or in the Oakmont Drive area with children having 10 ride in the street was noted. A concern was presented to clean up the debris in the park. Concerns of mulch choices during tick season was voiced, consider using Eucalyptus vs. Pine Straw. Comments of poor lighting and poor park access in the Oakmont Park areas were also made. Ridqewood Park - A call 10 prioritize improvements carefully based on the number of users and value provided to the entire communily was noted. An existing noise reduction need from SR 41 and a disassociation or distance to and between uses was commented on as being a current detraction. Oakmonl and Ridqewood Parks - There is little existing signage indicating parks are private property, provide better signage and note these as private property and no trespassing. There are concerns about the pine straw mulch, especially in the dry season, consider posting no smoking signs or other mulch options. Provide accommodations for dog walking. Communitv-wide Amenitv areas oarkinq - A suggestion to explore opportunities 10 provide more parking at Oakmont Park al each end of the park and lake lands was made. While investigaling parking facilities at the park locations provide for handicap spaces too. The Commons and Tram Station #4 - Provide pedestrian walkways at bolh north and south ends of the site from Pelican Bay Boulevard to the Foundation offices; in general, the addition of safe pedestrian passage through Ihe site and beyond the influence of the traffic areas was encouraged. Avoid routing non-tennis users through the tennis facilities. A suggestion to investigale opportunities to reduce noise (vehicular and pedestrian) into the tennis courts was made. Be careful to reduce parking, maximize available parking at this facilily. Suggest providing signage at north end exit to alert drivers lurning north of the median and appropriale turning movement required around it. Use of lands further west between the current facilities and the Community Berm was suggested. In relocating the Tram station away from the south end of the Foundations office building, a suggestion was made to relocate the trash areas to a screened area near where the Iram station exists today. Communitv Boardwalk & Berm - A suggestion to reconsider proposed berm path widening for narrowing and slowing of users was made. It was stated that previous boardwalk widening did not increase safety, but rather increased tram speeds and caused accidents. A comment was made about the potential impacts to environment and disruption of existing wildlife with berm path widening or other construclion. 111!1/20tO. 216636. Ver; 1 . KMANGAN N010J-086-00Z_ -0 16 r 1 A9 WilsOnMiller@ ~ A suggestion to consider a raised curb and/or shoulder for the berm as it has a steep slope was offered. The suggestion of plat form areas of pull off for resting, visual areas of interest or hiding berm functional elements for storm drainage was observed as a better idea than widening. A suggestion of a new fishing pier/platform near the Sandpiper access way was made. Other comments of improving the existing boardwalk with additional fishing outcroppings with landscape or mangrove maintenance were also voiced. SR 41 Berm and Communitv Edqes - It was noled by a few of the Town Hall participants that the safety and security of the wall atop the berm in the Oakmont Park area was jeopardized by the disrepair in the area. There is interest in noise reduction from residents that live along the SR 41 berm by use of walls and landscape however a concern of who pays for this was voiced. This concern extends to the long lerm maintenance of the landscape, sound walls and security measures along the SR 41 berm. Infilllandscape in selected areas on the berm to assist with security and sound issues at the edges of Ihe community was noted as desirable. Continue to use police reporting of roadways, break-ins, etc. to continue to better point to the needed areas of solutions that are being proposed. Given that the Strategic Planning Committee was also in atlendance, we would welcome any addilional community feedback that you may have heard that is not listed here. As any good design review will do, last weeks inpul from the residents and the Presidents Council has had us look at each solution with a critical eye. We will be including Ihe quality elements of review and comment that came from last weeks work; provide continued comprehensive design solutions so that the Community as a whole is benefiting in return on real estate, life style and aesthetic value and begin to prepare phasing and pricing solutions that are responsive to the use patterns and value commentary that has been provided in these meetings. We look forward to continuing to engage these groups accordingly in this process. 1/19!2010-216636.Ver: 1 KMANGAN N0103.08ij.OO2. _0 in-Street Crosswalk Signs I Crosswalk & Signal I Traffic Signs I Online Catalog I Traffic '" Page I of I 16 , I A 9 lWj r., 'j', 'II' ~ ISearChSite ~ Home OnhneCatalog Tralli<;Siglls Crosswalk&Sigl1al In,SI,,,,,tCros,walkSigns ,.., IIIOf'f'IIK,URT v,,",, ~ \ 1\) ., In-Street Crosswalk Signs Subtolal so 00 Sign [Stale Law Yield To Base jFixed Base Price: $348.95 OO~1I111iM1l11lI1 .~ ~ IiMl'illll1~I~ SKU 1636-12 :"l&!ImB !:DIIIIII' -.Tili.'.lr.l._ How M'lnv? p-- )!':_nnlll...'IIIUJ .'" Description Images -"''''.__'11I lJ.nmuaMlllll1.mmn: .....3nm111UIMII\W Features Models ~ElIIiIa These MUTeD and NCHRP 350 approved signs are designed for in-street use at non signalized crosswalks. They have an overall height 0147" with a panel size of 12")(44" Back-ta-back panels are sheeted with 3MTM Diamond Grade". Fluorescent Yellow Green, with 1Q"x24" 3MrM High Intensity sheeting inserts. '.':Ir........1I..,..~1II ...I11I11UJDlllIIlr .;'I!..llllUiIIlllRIlIll Chooselrom Legends Rl~6 'Slate Law Yield To' Pedestrian "R1-6a 'Slale Law Stop For' Pedestrian Rl.6 'Slale Law Yield To' Pedestrian with School plaque "R1-6a 'Slale Law SlOP For' Pedestrian with School plaque 'The 'Stop For'legend shall only be used in states where the state law specifically requires that a driver musl slop for pedestrian in a crosswatk. - ;.OIW.'Uh'.""'C' hllp:llwww.tapconet.com/store/product/65 ] cf844-4] 8e-4a 14-ab9d- 31 f842b I 04f4/In-Street... 1125/2010 J..U-....HL'-'''-'t LLU..,,, W au\.. '-'1511" I LIU~~WalK ex. 01gua11 lraIIlC :llgns 1 unllne LataJog IlraItlc... Page 1 ot 1 16 rIA 9 Home Online Catalog Traffic Signs Description Features Models IW} 'ti', 'i't 'if ~ ^!){Illllh () dlllt ~ It II( 'I )11('(1,111 fl w~ I<. )<P(jllldII)Ib (nrItd(\ lJ<. ISearch Site Ei Crosswalk & Signal In..StreetCrosswalkSigns In-Street Crosswalk Signs ..., IHOPPING C,\HT \ fwll f'\ I"...j,' I Subtolal$OOO SiQn I State Law Yield To B", I Fixed Base ..:.I .mmlfllmlIl -~ ~ :"1m'llIl .~... Price, $348.95 SKU 1636-12 How Many? r--- __ :i!:'.DIIill...UIRII V 10\ IU)!t\lllliiJr Images .1l'.,mma'..IWI U.rmnll1.1fRD~lImIf H:Umllll.....,..JIII ."""i1li"liIiT.i3 ..;s:.......'DIK...'WIlIPl ._r:llln.mil'iml, . All signs are equipped with an anti-twist feature to keep the panels properly aligned Post and panel are flexible polyethylene plastic, resistant to UV, ozone and hydrocarbons Flexing, reactive spring assembly with stainless steel cable tested at 200 lb. tension. ~ill,..mlDlIiIilnl ,"'- .- CoPVtlghl 2009 lap~(I Inc http://www.tapconet.comlstore/product/65Icf844-418e-4aI4-ab9d-31f842bI04f4/In_StreeL.1/251201 0 'U-"U"'" '-..lU"W'"1\, "'!,;"' I LfOSSWalK 01: ':>lgna111 raIne :SIgns I Unlme Catalog I Irattle ... Page 1 of 1 16 r I A 9 Home OnHne Catalog Traffic Signs -J ...' 'ii' 'I 'Ii' c::rJ:m:I Crosswalk & Signal In-$treaICrcsswalkSigns ISearch Site Ell --:') \IIOPPINf, (,if\T '{~I{ I L rn\ . ,I, t Subtotal $0.00 llllllDllfllt. I!liBnlnLt"~ .'1JillllIIl !:!DIlIIIIl ~.rlllllll_]lIIf1] .., &1..,IDIII_lIlIIlII i-l.nnnIllMlilll/,lIIm'11' .,..annm...lIlUlrflll ~1mJ[JD ':=....~1II...,A.'II1II~ ~inllllllll1 ~1.11lI1.lIllltilf:11 - CorYt'gh'2Doe'owo http://www . tapeonet.eom/store/produet/651 ef844-418e-4a 14-ab9d- 31 f842b 1 04f4/In-Street... Description Features Models in-Street Crosswalk Signs SiQn I State Law Yield To ..:1 Base I Fixed Base ::1 Price: $348.95 SKU 1636-12 How Many? r- -.r,lill'.P.I._ Images Select the base type, or order replacement sign assemblies 'Without Base' Available bases include . Fixed Base: Sign is attached to surface mounted base that can be affixed with epoxy or butyl pad. . Fixed Base with Quick-Release: Order the Quick Release option ii you want easy removal or replacemant oi delineators . Portable One-Base with Quick Release: A rubber base that allows you to easily transport the system to and from non-permanent applications. Parts can be detached and slacked to save space, and for easy transport ~ 1/25/2010 " '" Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee :t885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34'04 February 16, 2010 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes: January 19, 2010 V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report- Caroline Soto B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - Hannula VII. Landscape Architect Report A. McGee & Assoc. B, Windham Studios VIII. Old Business IX. New Business A. Review Applicant X. Committee Member Comments XI. Public Comments XII. Adjournment The next meeting is March 16, 20103:30 p,m. CC Transportation Bldg. 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 16 rl~A 1 0 Misc. Correa: ~p 11llmt: Co!"ies 10: 16 , 11 A 1 0" , Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 January 19,2010 Minutes 1. The meeting was called to order by Dale Lewis at 3:30 PM. II. ATTENDANCE Members: Dale Lewis, Betty Schudel, Bill Jaeger, Helen Carella, John Weber (Absent) County: Darryl Richard - Project Manager, Tessie Sillery - Operations Coordinator, Caroline Soto - Budget Analyst, Pam Lulich - Landscape Operations Manager Others: Mike McGee - McGee & Associates, James Stephens - Hannula Landscaping, Scott Windham - Windham Studios, Darlene Lafferty - Kelly Services III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Dale Lewis moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Second by Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 15, 2009 Dale Lewis moved to approve the December 15,2009 minutes as submitted. Second by Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. V. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. Budget Report-Caroline Soto reviewed the following: (See attached) o Available Operating Expense $104,768,76 o P,O. Paid to date $64,777,55 Darryl Richard reported a Budget Amendment in the amount of $340,000,00 will be prepared to recognize Carry Forward early, The transfer will increase Available Capital Improvements to $750,879.50. Additionally per Mark Isakson $344,000.00 is available for a Budget Amendment. (See attached) B. Project Manager Report-Darryl Richard: Discussed under VII A.(See attached) VI. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT-Hannula Jim Stephens gave information on Radio Rd. Sod repair: o Sod treatment will be applied o An additional treatment for Fire Ant hills will be performed o Measure deficient areas and install new sod 1611A.10 Mike McGee stated a Plant count and Plant replacement will be conducted simultaneously during Sod replacement on Radio Rd, VII. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT REPORT A. McGee & Associates - Mike McGee gave Phase Il-B status report: o Irrigation installation is underway o Removal of old curbing will commence this week (prior to grading and tilling) o Areas of compacted Lime rock and debris require pulverizing down to 18 inches o The Battery System ( for DC Controller) requires upgrade to a Marine Battery o Installation of valve box is required Darryl Richard reviewed Hannula Landscape Work Directive Change #1 in the amount of$I,724,00, (See attached) Dale Lewis moved to accept the Hannula Bid (Work Directive Change #1 in the amount of $1, 724.00.) Second by Betty SchudeL Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Darryl Richard reviewed the Project Schedule for Phase Il-B Lane Closures: (See attached) o Noted higher fees are applicable during peak season (See attached Exhibit A) o Installation of (Irrigation) Main Line and Laterals require 9 days oflane closures (1-4-10 to 1-14-10) o Staffwill coordinate with ROW to minimize lane closures during the Planting phase o Staff will monitor Construction schedule closely o Lane closure fees are paid by MSTU o Project Activity is being expedited to prevent February lane closures ($1,000 per day fee) The Committee reiterated dissatisfaction with higher lane closure fees being enforced by the County due to stalled progress on the Project. Darryl Richard will forward the BCC Executive Summary to clarify Lane Closure Policy, The Committee perceives the MSTU is spending Taxpayer beautification dollars to bring County property above Code Standards, Pam Lulich noted all County Departments pay lane closure fees excluding Maintenance, Dale Lewis noted the timing for lane closures was forced by the County, He perceived Permitting and County approvals stalled the Project generating higher fees during peak season, despite prodding by the MSTU Committee, Staff will coordinate with ROW to confirm requirements for lane closures, Darryl Richard reviewed BID 10-5415 Radio Rd. Total Project cost $558,341,90, (See attached) Phase 111 Part A Curbini! o Bonness Bid $333,753,68 - Curbing Alternate (Bahia Sod) - $20,919.42 Not required 2 1611l^ 1. 0'''' Phase III Part B Landscavinf! o Hannula Bid $224,588,22 - Landscaping Alternate #1 ~ $78,628. 76 Not required - Landscaping Alternate #2 ~ $30,847.00 Contingency items (Irrigation) - Landscaping Alternate #3 - $21,526.20 Not required o Adjusted Landscaping Bid Award Total $203,062,02 The adjusted Phase III Curbing and Landscaping Total Bid Award(s) is $536,815,70, After discussion it was concluded the Budget Amendment will be reflected in the (MSTU) March Budget Report after BCC approval (February 9, 2010 meeting,) Dale Lewis moved to award Bids to Bonness $333,753.68 and Hannula $203,062.02, and to include 10% Contingency for the Total Project. Additionally direct Staff to request a Budget Amendment in the amount of $344,000.00 to recognize the Carry Forward. Second by Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Darryl Richard reviewed AG TRONIX quotes $6,095,00 and $450,00 ($6,545.00 Total.) (See attached) Staff will obtain a quote from Hannula for Pad installation as an Electrician is not required for the installation, Dale Lewis moved to accept AG TRONIX Bids, in the amount of $6,645.00. Second by Betty Schudel. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Darryl Richard reviewed McGee and Associates quote in the amount of $2,142,00 for Limited Refurbishment Services, (See attached) Dale Lewis moved to approve payment to McGee & Associates in the amount of $2,142.00. Second by Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. B. Windham Studios-None VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. ABB Pending Proposal Staff announced the ABB Proposal for additional monies was denied as the Scope items are included in the original Contract. IX. NEW BUSINESS Darryl Richard announced Kelly Services is providing Secretarial Services in place of Mancan, X. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS-None XI. PUBLIC COMMENT - None 3 1611 Ai 0"" There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 4:30 P.M. Radio Road Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee ,,9 &1l~~~ Dale Lewis, Chairman These minutes a~foved by the Committee on as presented or amended . ,-). - 110 I 0 The next meeting is February 16, 20103:30 p.m. CC Transportation Bldg, 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 4 Fiala Halas Henning Coyle Colett 16 RlcA,~~ MAR 0 1 2i,] adio Road Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee ;qo5 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 Goard of County Commissioners SUMMARY OF MOTIONS January 19,2010 III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Dale Lewis moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Second by Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 15, 2009 Dale Lewis moved to approve the December 15, 2009 minutes as submitted. Second by Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. VI. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT - HANNULA Dale Lewis moved to accept the Hannula Bid (Work Directive Change #1 in the amount of $1, 724.00.) Second by Betty SchudeL Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Dale Lewis moved to award Bids to Bonness $333,753.68 and Hannula $203,062.02, and to include 10% Contingency for the Total Project. Additionally direct Staff to request a Budget Amendment in the amount of $344,000.00 to recognize the Carry Forward. Second by Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Dale Lewis moved to accept AG TRONIX Bid, in the amount of $6,645.00. Second by Betty Schudel. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Dale Lewis moved to approve payment to McGee & Associates in the amoumoJ $2,142.00. Second by Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. Misc. Corres: Date: Item I: Copies to ::l I- c Ul C :::ECON C.... . "'....en OC.... o::Z ~ O::l.. LL ::I is Ii ~ .... ." 'ii 0. 'ii , 1l '" '" N o V '" 0'" '"'" ((j<.D ;!'" 000 "''''0 criaici N"'O ? r--- ~ ~g~ majM "'~'" <0,"," M <00 VA 60 ~o N M ~~~~~~~~~~wm~~~~~w~ ',r- o ll) r- C 'c " E . '" u-, UJ (")U""\ ("~ a) C.l() UJ 1'- 0) ,') (j.") <" "'.t (J) '.I c' , (::> 'c ,,) ~::c ,'1(", i'- I', C' HJ ::> c", CJ OJ ,.) 00 ,\I W 00 '-:t O:J If' (;0 '., .)> C'i J (~ C> r-. 'T o 0 C\l o () --J ,rj 0("\1 ro 1.00 CO 0_ '" CO r_ ("'.I (0 N '>) iJ} u) ul ,J) UJ U <1) u) (Ii uJ it} cJ) (,j [I) U) <I' ((\ ,A- w o 0. o ~ E ~U o ;; c ,g t;:: '- 6 2.~ ~ ~t' .0:,'1:: Q) oo-=u. DQL!)(\j ~(')~~Oi<( iIi~~~~Z 0000 ;R~ _;1'--[;; o o.:ggg "'"'"' vvv . E ~ z c ~ 0 "C ~ :i.g J; > 0 ~ "'0 ~ .~ ",0: .!! ~i .~ ~ < COIJ)lJ1 N"'," a.iOlM "'a'" <O~ ,.: ~ ~:! ..,...;" "'''' "'N '"~ <0 .. ! 'ii .a :::I:g 1; C < GO >C W ~WtlF.ttf)~ N"m;:l)o<o ......COMO)aJ ciaiC'icriC\i q-o("')..-O :ri SS~~ v v ~ N UJ-EflV1l'AUJ-UJ-(flOO-ER-lfl(h w ~ , o w . '" c~ .::1 w "15 5 it i:i:u.u. u . c "e- 0 a. ~ c 0 o c ~ ~ ~ ~ -0 -g:fi ~ :I: 2 Q) Ql ~ ~ '" -;;; >- ~g-:fi 00 ~ 'V "g ~ :il ;::.2:: ~ ~ TIU:"O-COCl::b ~m~~~8~~ .2 U 2 1;; c: c: c . . 0 ",,,,u !!i!.E , , '0 ouiii $;!$! EE.9 QUe <<Q.\ 1Ui ~ ~~~ '0'0. C C > ~~'O -'-'''' 1IJ.~~ .~ :3 + ~~~ en.Q ~ o ~.E ~"E d ':;';;.....1 5Q)< u 0.... ~iTj~~ 'E ~ In.g lii ~ 16 ffi Q..u.C)....J ~~ zz "'~O tj&i~ ~MI() :gw~ v", N'" w"': N'" N ... ~;i a"' 0... g:g "'... :;;lil crien ~... "'.. ~~~ . v ~ 0<0", ov ciciai o~'" N '" M ;ngC!gg~ ~o;ri.oc:ici(<') (1)"......-00 co C')'<t"'f'-I'-..- ....r-...,:C"lM ('II C"'}C") NN 1611 A10 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . I t ~ H J >: ~ Hi <<ra::::Q:: 0 00 ~ ~~~8~ ~~~z~~~~ <0 N "' ~'" ...~~ ~o.," ;:t> o ~ go v v'" v ~ v ~ '" ~ '"u'" gggS:'2g8 1010('<) L()IO '<t"<t'<t '<t'<t ~~f;j'<t $a.~~~ OUo a >~ooo i5gg~ vvv iii "' ~ "''''''' 'E.'E. .8...0 8 ~~~.~.~ ~~~&Q) c c c U5 en (II tv (lI 0 ci. -;~~()~ ::;3"'5t5~ cCC:~2' ~ffi5i'CQi :I::r.I.E~ w ~o~~ ~~ ;g51Z"B Ul~ .:l'.:H~ .~ii5 cOo!io/jClQ)elllE III a. ~ >- co ~~~~~~~'5 @ 8' 8' fto e 1ii.~ :E:::!i::!:ZC::a.S:S: ~ ~ ;; 5 ,I N'" '"'" '"~ ",v 00 00 00 "'~ vv ov a"' ciai ON N_'<t_ 00 ov dei 0," "' <:i: <O~'" o O~ <ri ~....: '" ~v N "'~ "":NM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~-~~~~~ ~'1] '" v c_ ~ 0> "' ,.. ~ m '" w o ~ "' '" w v 00 00 dci 00 <00 "":<'>1 ON "''" .oM v<o ~ "' 000000 000000 cicicicicici 000000 (00_00010 o III 0) '"~ "'''' crir-,i "'"' ON "'''' ~wwwwwwwwwwwwwww~w_wwwww tI c ~ '" E E o u "- ~ GO C " ~ ::s <10 o o o o '" "' o e 00 00 cici 00 0<0 "'0 ;;; WfJ)WWEI)(flWlflWWW 00 0'" g~ <ON r---N "'''' ~<O oj <0 ~'" ~ oj '" N o V <0 o '" <ri ;! '" 0 w w o a> ow M '" -q ,~) ,.- ~- .... v ~ ... c; ~:! ~.. ill ~r ('I N ..-.. <.... 0) ('II ~V)W~W~~W0WW~WWW~W_fJ)fJ)fJ)U)tfl 0..".000 or-aoo 8Rgg8 o <0'" lCfai N ~<O 00000000 00000000 ciciciciocicio 00000000 O_OOIOOLOLOO 060l N..--N-'<f a........... a,..~f1 cicio! 0... v "''''''' :S'2S ~<O"' 00 00 cid 00 ~~ '"'" NN 000 000 ggg v<oo Nr-~ fJ)WWWWOO-Wl/}WfJ)WfJ)WWWW*W*WWWWfJ)fJ)fJ) a::::E t- 0 0 ~ <( z ~ Z l:! a::: a:::~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 ~oow <( ~ > W~~~ a:::W a::: Wz W ~ a:::U U ~ ~dffi~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ oo5~ ~ ~ ~~ ffi a:::t-w~uZwwm t-~~~ <u ~Ot- ~W a::: a::: <(~ 0 ~~W~~~XW~~~ O~Z<( ~~oo ~~; OO~W~ 8 ~8 Z t-t-~a:::~ <(~OZF oo-w~ a:::~O a:::~_0WU-~n0W Z 0. ~ ~~ZLU"''''''' LUZ !wWo'" LUZ LU .....ZZ_'oJz~n a.U,,-z ~~- u~~oo 0 a:::_u ~~~ a:::W-~~zw'oJ Z <(t-~O wW~~~OO~~~UI~t-U<( W~LU ~oa.~~a:::~~oo~; oooo~u g:jg;jO;:~a:::a:::~~a:::." 000~~ C)cnu ~o~~m~~ti!Z~..- zzoa:: ~~~Z0~~~~~: ~8~~~~a:::~ ~~<(~~oc~O~~~:~~~~0 ~~I~~~~~~~w... LU"'UU<(Ugz~z <(0000~Wo~wOOw~~ww>w o ~ -.....- - LU -~~LU uzW<( N ~>~~~t-t-~ > o~t-ZWOO>~~0 wooa:::LU... z-,,-~oo-OO~a:::3a:::~OCOO0WW!l!a:::~~ <(<(~oowzzoca:::~~ ~-o ~u t-z W-LU ... ,",. a:::~t_~~~<(~$~ 0z5~~~~~0.~3~~w~z~~w~~~~oo~m~. B~u..~a:::~e:uuZt- w~...J6u:J~ffJ~~~g:g~b~b~~C1~e:iE~~~~; NM~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~ 16 I 1 A 1 0'" 8 ~ ~ .. '" N "l ~ g ;t ll: .. .. .. '" ~ ~ i g ;I ~ .lil .; ~ '!! '" '" .. '" :i .. ~ '" .. .. ~J ~ ~ ~ g ~ 'E!",l~ f .~ '" ii~Ji !. l!]~ a:ft ~ t ~ .. .. ;;; ~ ~ l)t ;; .. co .. .. .. .. ~ !i f;! ." :':U~ ~ ~ 8 ~ - ~ "CJ ~- gj ~ ~ ~ <:: ~ " si lil lii u. ~ Iii ::i ~ ::l ~ '" .. N .. .. - .. f- .. l/) :::E ~ ~ g <:: ~1i 8 ~ ~ 0 N ~ :B "" ~~ ~ .,; lil ~ ~ ;i "'. "! '" .. - .. ~ .. " os ~- ~ - Gl ~ g ~ ;! a:l ~i ,,; ~ '" i ~ "CJ l::! ~ .. os 0 N .. .. .. - 0:: .. 0 h g ~ ~ '6 8 ~ os '" l:i lil l .. 0:: i ::: ! , '" .. '" .. III ~ ~! ~ ~ ~ g ~ os <:: '" <( '~ ~ .. .. .. ~ .. ~ ~ 'E! i .. .. .. :i os l! '" ~ ~J 8 ~ g g. ~ .. lil ~ ~ '!! - .,; os ~ !;; ~ (J .. .. .. .. 1i! 0 ! I ~ I i J j ~ i:. ~ 11. f l!' J $ '" ~ ! ! ~ ! i l; '" ?1t4ee & ?1ld~te4 Landscape A2:'chitecibJre 1611A.t 0..... JanUBl)' 14, 2010 Mr. D8nyI RfchaRI, project Manager eom. County TraIIlc Op....liolls III1d A/tI!ITl8tiveT,,",~ _ 2885 SouIh Hilrweoihw Drive Nlipkla. Florida 34104 subf<lct L)rnIled~Sel1riceS8.pennitledbyIheF_T"""P. r ..IanaI~~re1 _ Canlr8c:l1llll8-!i06O, ReqtMSt far FIsaof Year 0llJD91'or RatRD RaBd M.ScT,U" 2~1PMad2 Deer.Mr. Richerd: As ~ by your _, thefollawing is Ill-*" far your revlew III1d approval. ~,b@I8nce....,..nIrIg an thIa POeOO105332of $3,071.liO less.our ~ 20IlIl i~ farllOnuel cooslllling of $82i1:IlOle/lW!SS2.i4'12,liO which wtII aaveraur 1Mll....."""'" mnsuIIing .eiviceli'1hiaugh~11,2010, . , ~.... l8questinIJ slime extilnslan.td03l3112010 III1d adiIltl...l8lhcxn lIS _ beIaw undei'the'UmIted ~"'~_n-~a.,,~ Unit RMe Coat Pli~JSerjiar UIndscape .Altf;iIioCl T~D M",~ . 12 $128.00 8 $82.00 2 $55,00 T_: $15311.00 $4ll6.oo $11.0.00 12;142;00 (l1me & Maleri!ds) (l1me & MatI>rt!ds) (l1me&~) t~t~...nt of work order m~ req\M8t.............$~142.00 ":Y9\Jl,l\In!8 any ~ or ~ fl!rIIIior~ ~ 1:oIeIfl1Ie fD dor1I8l;taur aftIce eny time. 'lVelll8looking fbrWer<tfD-..g wIlhyour~_.ii1Provlnganclll'i8fnllllnlri "" rtJ8dWey8, ~ o,.lgn *en~Jl\:'"/~t.".~ *Pl~i~9* ~~~.:~~ 507S T......TiIllI_J P. 0;. "'~Nj~,~34101 ~ (23I)jf17-GJ07* .~~.,(239) 417_ LC... FL10aA . (f) 16 , 1 A 1 0.... TransDortation DeDartment WORK DIRECTIVE CHANGE PROJECT NAME: Contract 09-5244; Contract Radio Road Landscape & Irrigation Project, Phases lIB & IA CHANGE # 01 DATE OF ISSUANCE: 0111412010 OWNER: Collier County Board of Commissioners CONTRACTOR: Hannula Landscape EFFECTIVE DATE: 01/1412010 PROJECT#: Contract 09-5244 ENGINEER: McGee & Associates You are directed to proceed promptly with the following change(s): Description: Work Items to address sub-grade rock material found in median East of Devonshire Rd. on Radio Road during construction of project. Purpose of Work Directive Change: (1) Remove rocks and asphalt (found as 'existing roadbed' material); (2) Mix soil mechanically (mixing/grindingltilling machine); (3) Provide 2 valve boxes to be used for batteries for the 2 solar panels for DC Irrigation Controllers Attachments: Hannula Quote for Change Items for Change Order No. I (received on 1/13/2010) If a claim is made that the above change(s) have affected Contract Price or Contract Times any claim for a Change Order based thereon will involve one or more of the following methods of detennining the effect of the changes(s). . Meth04 of determining change in Contract Price: 181 UIllt Prices 181 Lwnp Swn o Other Estimated increase (lieeult'lc) in Contract Price $ 1,724.00 By: Method of determining change in Contract Times: o Contractor's records o Engineer's record o Other Estimated change in Contract Time: Increase or decrease by l! calendar days. AUTH~-:)~;<~~J/_, 01/1+(2-010 Bv: I / D~I Richard,~ect Manager, Owner's Representative 01/14/10 1 :23 PM AG.TRONIX SPEClAUIlHG IN MoToRolA IRR~Al1ONCOIllROL SmEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 16 J 1 A 1 0 QUOTA TION/PROPOSAL DATE ~UOTE NO. 1/15/2010 1429 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOA TMffransportation flNANCEDEPARTMENT 330 I Tamiami Tr E, Bldg F 7th Fir. Naples, FL 34112 TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLC ITEM DESCRIPTION OTY PRICE TOTAL Radio Road. Phase III- Irrinet M DC .24 Stations (MASTER 1ST RADIO ONLY) F 4964A IRRlnet M-DC 12 DO and 4 DI, w/ Radio Kit (Radio I 1,425.00 1,425.00 Ready) V260AM ADD DC 4/12 I/O Expansion Kit I 375.00 375.00 FUE5523 CDM750 Radio 403-470 MHZ I 888.00 888.00 MLB-12-DC Surge Protector DC 4inll2out 2 340.00 680.00 34965 Sunsaver 10 Voltage Regulator I 72.50 72.50 BSP65-12 65 Watt 12V Solar Panel I 530.00 530.00 SPBLG Solar Panel Bracket (Large) J 105.00 105.00 BBF27DM24 Battery (Heavy Duty Marine) I 120.00 120.00 BK730-4009 Battery Box I 24.50 24.50 SB-18SS SS Enclosure 18W X 36H X 12D I 1,290.00 1.290.00 PED-18SS SS Pedestals 18W X 12H X IOD I 375.00 375.00 70072 Yagi Antenna 450-470UHF 7.ldb (N Female) 1 150.00 150.00 451969 LMR400 20' Antenna cable w/ conn (LMR400) 1 60.00 60.00 Thank you for your business. TOTAL $6,095.00 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. AG.TRONIX SPEClAUlING III MoToROlA IRRIGATION CONlROl SmEMS 1304 N, 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239-657-5519 1611 AI0 QUOTA TION/PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO. 1/15/2010 1430-0 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOA TMlTransportation FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3301 Tamiami Tr E, BJdg F 7th FIr. Naples, FL 34112 TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLC ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL Radio Road Phase JII-Tectmical service expense for Ag- Tronix to supervise contractor on the installation of Trrient M-Dc SCI Service Call I 50.00 50.00 IT Travel Time 2 50.00 100.00 FLI Field Labor 4 75.00 300.00 Thank you for your business. TOTAL $450.00 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. r- 16 , 1 AiO - LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROJECTS: RADIO ROAD LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PROJECT PHASES liB and IA BID NO, 09-5244 RADIO ROAD ROW Permit No. 09-0n3-E CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE DATE: January 21, 2010 HANNULA LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION, INC, DESCRIPTION Notice To Proceed Mobilization 1. MOT Plans 2, ROW Permits START END REVISE 11-13-09 11-13-09 Complete 11-13-09 11-16-09 Complete 11-13-09 11-27-09 Complete 11-13-09 11-27-09 Complete 12-14-09 12-23-09 1-21-10 Directional Bores Lane Closures: Directional Bores ~ Irrigation 1. Install Main Line, Laterals, Wire 12-10-09 01-15-10 1-18-10 2. Install Valves, 12-21-09 01-15-10 1-23-10 3. Install Controllers 11-13-09 01-22-10 1-29-10 (Note: Delay In County Receiving Controllers From Supplier To Be Installed By Contractor: Ship Date To Be Confirmed By County,) 4, Install Motors, Misc, Heads, Bubblers, Lane Closures Irrigation, Sidewalk Closures Irrigation Lane Closures: Irrigation 12-10-09 01-22-10 1-29-10 [;-. - -. :./7/:J(i ., /., 'J 11 lIe --. Sidewalk Closures: Concrete Pavers 1. Install Pavers Lane Closures Site Preparation and Grading 1. Spray And Till 2, Finish Soil Layer Lane Closures: Site Work 01-05-10 01-15-10 1-27-10 12-09-09 12-17-09 01-15-10 01-22-10 1-23-10 1-23-10 Landscaping 1. Install Trees 2, Install Shrubs 3. Install Mulch 4. Sodding Lane Closures: Landscaping: 01-22-10 01-25-10 01-22-10 01-25-10 01-31-10 01-29-10 01-29-10 01-31-09 1-31-10 1-31-10 "-;--"'-~'~..~ .' Substantial Completion 02-10-10 02-10-10 (90 Days) Final Completion 03-12-10 03-12-10 (120 Days) 1611 Al0 16"rl~A10' ~ > " > " > " ttl' " " ttl ;:;:' OJ ;:;:' OJ ;:;:' OJ OJ OJ OJ c: ~ ;:!, :Il: ;:!, ;:!, II> ;:!, ;:!, ~ :Il: tD ttl N ttl ...... ttl ttl ttl > !U ,.... !U c: !; n OJ ::I ::I ::I ::I c:: '" Q. Q. Q. Q. 0- Il> II> II> II> 5' n n n n OJ OJ OJ OJ lJQ ~ "C "!:!. "C "C I 5' ::I 5' 5' lJQ lJQ lJQ lJQ ~ .z. ,~ S ()., f ~ ~ I' () '\I> W W ,w -..J 111 ~ a> 00 '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> ...... N 111 W W 111 W 00 W \D a, 1n 10 ':...J 0 N ~ 00 \D -..J 0 ~ 0 w 0 a> w 00 '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> .... N 00 .... \D \D W P a> \D -..J _-..J -..J 10 a, '0 ...... 111 ...... 111 -..J ...... po po 0 ...... po ...... a> 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~'\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> '" W ...... W 0 N W -..J -..J \D ,~ W ...... 0 ,00 .!'" \D ~ N 1n 00 a> N 10 ...... N .... N ...... ...... a> !'" -..J po 111 !" ~ io N 0 -..J 0 N 00 0 0 a> N .... ).i r '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> W N 00 .... ...... \D N !>> ...... \D ,00 ~ w a, 1.u ...... N N -..J 0 w ...... 111 ~ !" \D N N N \D 0- :r:.. \D .... N \D .... '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> 111 ...... N .... W 00 \D 111 W \D w w \D ,w \D ........ ,-..J 111 111 00 a> N 1n ...... N N 1.u 00 ...... 111 00 111 N \D W -..J a> .... 00 N N ~ 00 0 00 0- :r:.. In 0 -..J In 0 In 111 0 0 0 111 0 0 0 '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> '\I> .... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 00 \D ...... ...... W -..J ,-..J '0 ':...J a, 10 a> ...... w \D N 111 a> \D !" 00 !'" In 0 a> io 0 -..J 0 0 -..J 0 '\I> '\I> .... N -..J ...... W ..... 00 -..J 00 a> 0 0 0 0 0 " ~ '" '" '" '::1 CiI " '" N '" -~ III J;;: '" N j '" " ~ 16 , I~ . : ,A I 0" , (f) -< '" N N N N N N N ~ '::1 N ~ a; ::: a; 0 '" a> ~ '" '" ... '" 0 '" U; t 0; ;;; ::: " '" a> ~ '" '" ... '" N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 " R! 0 1;l '" N ;;; ~ ::; iA , iA iA ;;; '" ! '" '::1 '::1 a; ~ iA 0 .!l ~ ,(, \1 ~ ~ ;0 ;;; ;;; ~ m '" r; '!: f ~ '" t ~ ~ 0 01 ll: a> ~ '" .. , iA ~ f ~ -'., 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 !i ~ N ,(, ,(, ,j, '" c. . z :: ~ N 8 0 ~ '" 0 P -0 -l -l -l -l -l 0 l: ;0 (f) (f) (f) ,. co " " [!; 5; (f) ,. 0- 0- ~ ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; m Q Q 0 ;0 0 l: m m ;0 '" '" " ;: ;: ;0 " 0 c: co l: ;: m '" " z ~ 15 z z ~ -0 -0 " ;: m m m 0- ,. 0 " " " " " 0- Z Z c: m ~ ~ " ;: ;: ~ " " " " " " '" " " c: ?i m iA m m Z co m m ~ m (f) (f) '" (f) ;0 '" r:: 0 0 15 15 15 15 15 -l ;0 (') x Z -l -0 ;0 ;0 -l 0- ;0 ~ 0 0 oi z <;; ;; ;; ;0 -l i" 6 -l en en ~ ~ ~ m -l ~ " " ~ ~ Z m S (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) -0 <: " ;;j ~ ;0 Z -l -l -l -l :d z ~ -l -l 0- m 15 (f) '" '" '" 0- 0- Gl " ;0 ;0 ;0 ;0 " m Z Z m en m en m ~ ~ co ~ m m ~ 0 0 ,. Z 0- ;0 '" (') (') z z 6 'ii 'ii 'ii 'ii 'ii ,. m ~ ~ ~ -0 -l ~ 6 r:: -l 0 ,. "l " ;::; ~ (') " " z (') z m m m m m ;: 0 z z (f) '" '" ~ 0 m ;0 m Z ;0 m '" z -0 -l m m i" ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" ;0 ;0 '" " z ~ co Gl " ~ ;: ;: Gl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z ;::; m m ;::; (') ~ ;0 :I: :I: OJ m " en en ;0 " 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- ~ -l 0- ;: ;;; 0- ;: m ,. 15 g -l 0 Z -l -l r:: -l ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ;0 '" 0 0 0- ;0 r:: " m ;;j !:j ZS -l 6 ji 0- 6 Z Z co ?; (') m 0 -l a :OJ m <;; < (f) Q 0 0 15 :I: Z Z z Gl Gl co -l '-< " ji :I: 1'i z -l -l -l -l -l Z ~ (f) '-< m OJ " 1'i -l ~ co (') Z " :I: :I: :I: :I: :I: ;0 '" r:: z ;0 " ~ " m :I: 0 0 ~ '" -l -l ::j ;': 0 ;0 0 Gl 1'i ~ Gl m m m m m m ;b Z :I: 6 " :I: Z 1'i 0 -0 1'i z C '" ;0 ;0 ;0 ;0 ;0 z Z -0 0 ;: ;: ;: ;: 0 " ,. z ., 1'i m 0- -l (') -0 ;0 '" '" (') '" ll: ;: ;: m Z z ;0 m 6 ;0 0 ::! 0 0 0 0 0 0 " '" Gl 0- ~ ~ '" ~ -l ;0 l: l: E -0 ;0 '" C -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 0- m m ~ '" z m m ~ m ,. m ~ <;; <;; <;; ~ m 0- 'U (') -l m g -l I"- (f) - ~ " -< m < '" d m is! m m n , (f) '" (f) -l m -0 0 m g -l m 0 '=i 0- ;0 -0 i!! '" -l -l -l :! :! -l <: 0- 0 (f) g '" I'2J ;: r:: 0- co '" ~ 0- :::! :!! ;0 ~ -0 Q ~ $1 !5 15 ~ 9 m ~ '" -l ,. '" co ;0 :l :::! 0 ;0 m Z ;;; ~ 8 z m " ;: 0 z OJ OJ " :I: r,; " " .., "l ?; 0 1'i ;; m z " -< ~ ~ ::! ;0 0- (') g z >- m ~ ~ 0 -< m '" ~ r:: -l 0- r:: z z 0- ::; ::; = m - '" g z 0 c @ !'! ::; ::; ~ N 0 m !l: I'2J I'2J r:: ;0 ;0 ;5 m ;0 ,. -l 0 r:: ;0 " ;0 i" >- co ...J Z 2; 3 c co m (') ~ m :; r:: z m €i ;0 " '" -0 ~ d d d d ...J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ;: 0- 0- 0- m 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- ~ ~ (f) ~ ~ ,. ~ '" '" 0- ~ (f) '" '" (f) '" '" " " (') (f) '" 0- 0- 0- r:: " " " " " -< '" -< -< " -< -< -< -< -< -< -< -< -< -< -< '" (f) '" Z ::; <0 0 N ... '" - ~ ~ N 0 '" '" ... ~ ... '" '" ... '" t a; &: ~ <0 8 III ~ " U; g i'J N 8 i'J i'J '" ~ '" 0 '" '" ... '" ... '" '" ... N <0 '" '" '" N - ~ - '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .. .. .. '" .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. r:: z '" W N ::; '" ... -0 N '" ~ 0 '" '" "' 8l '" 8j N 0 01 N ~ ii: ~ 0 8 g '" --I 0 0 '" '" ~ '" '" ~ ... 0 '" '" a> '" 0 '" ~ '" ... ~ 0 1'i m "' 'i 8 '" a; 0 g " <0 '" '" '" is " 8 is :,. ig '" :<: 8: RJ i:: " '" 8 8 0 is 8 m < ... a> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... 0 0 m z .. '" .. .. '" .. '" .. .. .. .. .. '" '" .. '" .. .. .. '" .. '" .. '" .. '" .. '" .. '" .. .. '" .. "' " >- ~ ... ... " -< --I 8 .. ~ 8j N 8 " '" N '" 0; N 0 0 '" - '" '" ... ~ '" <0 '" a> N '" '" <0 ... r:: z " ~ ... '" ~ <0 '" ~ b 0 .... '" 8l ... <0 ... 0 ... ... ~ 0 '" '" '" ~ ~ '" '" z '" a> 8j ~ '" :f ::: 0 a> ... ~ ~ 8 8 N ... ~ 8 &: ... ~ 0 g: ~ i!l ~ 8 '" -l '" '" a> '" a> '" N a> '" '" ~ '" ... N N ... '" '" <0 0 is ;: " :,. t " '" is ~ is '" i,g :,. g 8 is is is 8 is 8 8 a> " '" Sl '" i,g 8 8 8 8 " ... a> 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 .. .. .. '" .. .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" r:: z ~ - <0 ::; - N -0 " N N N ~ 8 8 8 '" 0 ~ ~ ill '" gj N g '" 11; Rl '" ~ N - N 1'i c ~ '" '" ~ '" a> 0 <0 0 a> <0 '" a> '" N a> '" ... Ii! " " " '" " 8 8 8 8 8 is 8 '" is " 0 i,g is 8 is '" is " is is 8 '" is is 0 m 0 0 0 '" '" 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 " " .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0 Z --I >- 'Ii ll: " ... .. ~ 0 --I ... ~ ::: '" ~ a> W '" ... <0 '" ;;; " r:: Z '" '" ~ ~ " a> ~ a> '" a> 0 - '" '" ~ ~ '" N .. Z Gl -a> ~ '" '" '" ~ '" a> '" '" .... ~ ~ 8 ~ ill '0 <0 ~ Ii] ~ !:l N t ... ... @ '" 0 -l a> a; <0 ~ ... ... ill <0 ~ g 'l: N g 0 .. '" a> N &: g .. 8 8 0 N ... '" 0 a> ~ 0 0 ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" <0 8 " 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 g '" g is 8 is 8 8 " 8 is is is " is 8 8 8 is is " " 0 0 0 0 .. .. '" '" .. .. .. '" '" .. '" '" '" '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. '" .. .. .. .. .. '" r:: z ::; <0 W '" -0 ;0 - a> ;;; N ~ 1'i "l ~ a> N 8 ill '" "l ~ 'l: t N 0 0 ... '" ~ '" 0 '" N a> a> N <0 '" ... <0 a> '" '" 0 ~ ~ m '" '" '" '" " '" '" " j i:: ~ ::: a; 11: '" <0 ~ '" :,. !!] ~ ~ ~ '" '" U; '" '" '" :,. '" ~ ~ 0 N ~ 0 N a> 0 N '" '" 0 '" '" '" '" 0 '" .. .. .. '" '" .. .. '" .. .. '" .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. '" z .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. z m "' "' ~ '" ... 0 '" l'l ;;; ~ &: '" ... ~ 0; r:: '" ... ~ '" <0 ~ N '" '" ... N '" '" ~ ~ <0 '" Z '" '" ... '" '" a; '::1 ~ ~ a> ~ N :: '" '" <0 0 ~ ~ ... ~ 'g: a> '" 0; '" ;;; N "l -l '" !!l 11; '" a> '" a; ~ ... $ .~ N 8 ~ ... ~ '" a> 0 8i ~ a> N '" 0 <0 N '" a> 0 0 '" a> '" 0 '" ~ '" '" 0 N ~ ... 0 ~ ~ '" N <0 '" '" 8 '" 19 '" ~ '" '" a; g, i,g ~ :,. '" 8 ~ ~ '" '" '" '" i,g '" " ~ '" '" '" " :,. a> ~ N ... 0 N '" '" N " 0 '" 0 N 0 a> <0 a> 0 '" 0 '" '" '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. r:: z ::; U; a; 0; -0 ~ '" " N ~ ~ N '" :: n ~ '" '" ~ '" '" ;;; ... a; 8 N m ~ - '" ... - '" ~ '" 0 '" '" a> 0 '" '" 0 0 '" '" '" N 0 a> '" '" 0 " " "' ~ '" 11; is 8 " 8 8 8 ~ 8 '" is '" ~ is 8 g :,. " '" '" " '" is " " 0 ... '" 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 :< .. '" .. .. '" .. .. .. '" .. .. '" .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. '" " .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. z z r:: ~ ,. ll: 0 r:: fJl ~ j '" z ::: t - ~ '" .. '" '::1 U; a; 0; -l <0 .. - ~ '" '" ~ <0 '" ~ ... ~ - ~ t '" ~ .. '" N '" ~ N N ~ '" 'l: N "l a> ill N 8 a> '" '" ... " ~ '" :: '" ;;; t ~ N ill N 0 g l!l g .. a> 8 &: III ... 0 '" &J ~ <0 ... 8 N N .. ~ <0 0 l" ~ 0 '" 0 0 N '" 0 a> ~ '" 0 ~ i:: '" " <0 " '" 1: is '" is 8 is 8 8 OJ is is 8 " 8 is is 8 8 '" "' <0 '" i;; " 8 " is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. '" '" .. .. .. .. .. .. '" '" .. .. '" .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. '" .. '" .. .. .. '" .. r:: z ::; ... ::: ... -0 '" '" a> i!! N '0 <0 N N ~ @ '" 8 8 " 8 N 8 '" '" ~ <0 '" N N m '" - N N N '" 0 0 0 0 0 <0 a> <0 '" ... N <0 ~ a> 0 '" 0 is '" '" '" is is is is 8 " is 8 8 8 is is '" '" is '" i;; 8 8 " is is is is 8 8 0 0 '" 0 0 0 '" 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. '" '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. '" .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. z 0 ,. "' ll: 0 r:: '" ... z .$ - - " '" - 8l ... N ::: - ~ ... '" ... ::: ... -l .. - - i i 0 <0 .'" ... '" '" ... '" '" ~ ~ ~ - N '" '" '" N '" ~ 8 8 ~ "l ... ~ ::: ... <0 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ i': ~ ~ '2 '" ~ '" N 0 0 0 '" m " . Q, o' " o . Q, ;: ~ c " ~.~ ,,- ,,'i' .1(: . ~ . '" "'-0 ,," c " ;3---1 5" )> ~ " o , . 2 n c. o , . -0 .. , . " ~ '" ... '!: (f) OJ 0 ;; 0 0 >- Z 0- -l " m 0; ;0 ,. ii :I: -l ~ m Z (') 0- r:: 0 m '" ~ -l m ;0 " m ;0 -l i" N m ;0 .. ;: 0 ;:; z 9 N '" '" ... .. ~ a> .. N N ~ ... RJ ~ '" '" .. N o ~ <0 :,. N .. N !:l '" " o " " 0- "' " ~ .... a> o ~ !l. ~ ~ !l. ~ 16 hI! 'A .'1 '-';'1 r~l . . , I en", ~i ~. "'" , ,. S 5' , . -;> p m ~ 5 '" )> '" . " - - ::; m .. z P f-- iii .. c m en n '" 'ii ::I d 0 z ~ r- Dl .. en m + .. r- -i m '" z ~ m - c: z ::; - 0 ::;! I-- c: z ::; "0 '" 0 m .. .. ... .. '" 0 '" c: -ill z -i Rl c: z ::; "0 '" 0 m .. .. .. ... 0 '" c: ~ z a -i ~ 0 c: z ::; "0 '" (j m .. .. .. '" 0 ~ c: z !!J -i '" 0 c: z ::; "0 '" 0 m .. .. .. 0 c: ... z '" -i ~ '-., 0 '" <n '" c: z ::; "0 '" 0 m .. .. .. 0 c: ... z ~ -i '" ~ " . ~ 5 " o . ~ '" en "" c: " ~.i n- ,,\ ~~ . , w- '" c - ".- :j") '" " o , o 2' n " ~ " " , o Cl c '" " . < 5' '" C . . 3 o 0. Z o , -;c.-1(/)(/)s;tc;b 3.,..,..., - t: -. (tI 3::l'1(J)llJge!.a.rn Ilj' fi} 5 ii ~ ~ co"8 ~~'<~~![g::J g, 0' ~i3. ~ s: Q.~. ::J ..... (J) 0 n III m )> 00< - 0 ::::I 31" W~~ fi} 2. ~ 2- ~t5 iii- @ ~ 5 iil . . c- o . o . r- g "- '" c . 5' o . . -i :T !!1, o ~ o :E :J o - -i :T o ~ :J C/l $!l '" cto '" '" VO :J o - - .... ~ 0, o o m '" '" ~ ~ 01 W ~ o o o '" ~ CO ~ 01 "'" '" 01 o o IV ~ IV ~ o CO m c IV Ol Ol CIl G) m @. :T o 0- iii' oj :0' ;:0 o C/l CD_ Ol Ol o 0 ~~ '" '" :r 5' ~ ~ iii" en . '" ~ :i :;: CD o en lS :J ::I: <- CD_ 0 :T :J C/l o :J_ ~ 0 :;: :E o '" c ::), ~ Ol CD 0 ,S;; Om; ~ 5' Ol ~ o iii" ~ '" 5' ~ en '" '" '" ~ &l 5" 0- :J :J ~ g :T - ~ ~ ~ ~ i i x x x ~ ~ 0; 0; ~ 0; rRrR C/l "0 0. ~ 3 CD ~ n' '" :J " '" ~ 3 C/l o ~ 01 01 .j>. 0 o co m m '" '" ;-.J ;-.J ~ ~ 00 0) G) ;:a o ~ c: 00 z c (") CIl ;s:: I o me)> < ;:a I ;s:: m ;:a CIl CIl ;s:: I CD c '" iil :T 3 :J en m. o :1 M' '" c- - ~ CD :J ~ @. 8- CD '" 0 ~ @ g: 0. ~. <'" Dr ~ ~. " o ~ 3_ C/l I ~ ~ ;:a ...., 0) c: lD en ~ ;s:: 0 <CD 5- ~ ~ <" ::), C/l G) " ~ Q1 @' C/l c- -0 C/l c '" C/l 3' :T CD ::I: o '" '" '" ~'&l~ 0' 0' 0' :J :J :J ~ IV ~ 0; ~ "1 X ~ 0; IV 00 .j>. 01 IV .j>. 00 .j>. CO m m m '" '" '" ~ IV .j>. 01 00:>0. 00...., -II. -'" -'" ...ll. 01 .j>. '" IV ~ iii o ;s:: CIl ;:0 -0 m ~ ~ CD - iii' c- ? n '" - '" ~ ~ ~ g. el se- iii' ~ g 3 - CD 03'" L~ ~ m- ro 0 ... 3 '" ~ '" :J '" " ;s:: 0 00'" ~ :] e- !!1, ~,~ -0 3 'CD ~ ~ ~ -0 3 '" 3' " 0' ~ c: '" ;:0 ~ !!1. -0 '" 3' ~ ~ OJ OJ o 0 '" '" ~3 g ff c- :T ~ g' -'" (") '" g CD po 3 '" - (") :T ~. ~ ~ ~ q w ~ ?- ~ R3 ~ f' ~ g c- '" C/l CD (") c-~ o o 3 CD '" c. n (") :T s. Ef :T CD '" 0. ~ ~ Jl. I\) 0> (.oJ ...ll. -.lo. ""'-I 0) -...J m m m m '" '" '" '" ~ IV ~ ~ ~ ~ g.J 000 0 000 0 ~ -ER-Efl -Efl~.Efl -(fl...ll.-{fl-Efl '" '" '" '" IV .j>. '" '" IV <>>0> '0(00, cO>~-...., ~ ~ -Efl ~ ~ 0 -Efl ...ll. 0> ~ N -...J ~ 0 0) ~ 0 0 ...ll. ~ 0> 0 N ~ 0 0 N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 o .j>. 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0) 0. 0. o 0 ~ ~ '" '" O1W ~ 0 o 00 o a, o 0 ~ 00101 00.0:> 0001 ~ ~ ~ IV .j>. IV 0, 0, 0) 00 '" IV o IV 0) 000> 0001 -'" ...It. -'" I\.) CO CO 01 .j>. 00 IV 01 0 000 0 000 0 ~ ifl -'" ifl * ..j>. IV 01 .j>. -"'ooOlb 01 0'> CD /Xl Q) ~ 0 0 000 0 000 0 ~ , ~ !!: ~ C/l ~ o CO -i ;s:: C o G) z -i ;s:: r- '" '" ~ g ~ CD g 0 CiJ 6j' Dr a ~ ~ ~. ':'> :J '" C/l C. o :;; z !e. 0 OJ g. m 0 :T :T '" ~ gJ. 5' CIl - ~ CD ~ G) CIl o 0 c: S- CD :T :J CD -i 3 2 ;s:: ~ ~ CD :J - 0 ::;i or CD CD z '" n :T CD N o ~ ~ ::l- en ~ ~ ~ OJ o 0 '" .fll X 0) ~ ~- @ 0. . ;:0 IV -0 0. G) , ~ Q .~ ~ ;:0 !!1. -0 G) o ~ $!l 0; <: . '" 0 -.fll ;s:: c ;:0 :!: ~ "'" !!?, :J to en "0 iii" :J - '" - ~ c !!1. ~ ~ '" '" 0) m m m '" '" '" ~ IV '" 0) 0 CO CO ...., ...., 000. 000 ~ ~ ~ IV 0) O1O>W o CO 0) ...., ~ 0 000 000 IV IV IV .j>. 0) 0) .j>. 0 CO 000 000 ~ ~ ~ ",.j>. ....,ww kl ~ ~ '5 g g c- '" C/l .CD ;:0 -0 G) o ~ '" CO ...., 0. o ~ 01 ~ 01 o o IV 0) CO o o ~ -'" ...., 0) 0) o o ;s:: c C/l "'" ~ CD CD o ~ @ CD ~ ::l- en $!lo; E . '" 0 -'" ;s:: c ;:0 T' - ~ "'" C/l 5' to en "0 iii" :J - '" - c- '" C/l CD ;:0 -0 G) o ~ ~ .j>. m '" 00 ...., C <- r- ~ CD iil - a CD 3 iii' ~ c C/l "'" ~ CD CD_ '-- '" - ~ ~ :T '" 5' ~ CD ~ 3' '" CIl tQ~ pl <- '" - ~ ~ :T '" -0 '" - is' -i iil CD OIV ~ 01 $!lto C ~ '" - -OJ :T .- ;s: c ;:0 r ~ "'" C/l 5' to en "0 iii" :J - !!1. c- '" C/l CD ;:0 -0 G) IV '" m '" ~ ~ IV o o ~ IV 0, ...., 0) o o ~ IV 9 o o ~ IV -...., 0) o o o -i -0 C/l ~ !i: ~ =t m z -i m C/l--i O))>~c ..O-i'-im ~ 0 ~ , -. .. en...c"'m3"" '<-i::l.iilCCDO 3m-<"OC/lS'C ;:a",o=t_-i ~:g~m g Oz- , ~ is'!!: '" C/l~:J)>CD-o ;,CDOl-iCD.... -. c.-m X m'" ::I CD -. 2!.~_a~,~. ~ lD!I!!!1.-o,-;:a o ~ .., en (/) >- Ate; 0 en-i ::10 m CDO g_'~ ~ CBz .., w rn)> ~12. ~ ~z 3 AI - ;;j' C ::I 1;; C CD '5!. 0 ~. 1il AI 0 0-0 a 0' g,O en CD Cir en " c. ~)> :T ;s:: 0' ~ c 0 c: n c :if :T ~ -0 ;r ;:0 (") iii' ~ 0 0::1 ~ .!. 3" ... 0 3 c -< 0 0::1 ;:0 0' ::I ~ ~ @ Z "" 0 ... A) n' c: Q 3 CD ~ CD 0 2 ... C/l o 0 ~ ::I (") i: Q, ~. '5!. AI ::I !:!: il VI C/l g, 'tl CD 3 n ;C' 3i " c- AI AI g n ::I ~ VI -g ., ~ CD " 3i " AI ... o' ::I - ~ ~ " E" ~ c. o CD "0 - Z ~ c '2' 3 CD :J - CO ...., ~ '" 0) CIl " @ ~ IV CIl " 00 ~ IV o Ol ~ C/l ~ 01 I ;:0 ~ '" o IV CO W o ~ IV 0) -...., CO 0) o o ~ .j>. '" CO 0. o 01 ~ 01 01 o o o ~ .j>. 0) 0> CO o o o ~ ...., 01 o o o 16 t' 1 A 10~~ .j>. '" )> s: '(' '" C" :r c - f" s: ~ ~ ~ ~ :J 2 f- ~ 0 "0 - - a Q3 ~ 5: :!l CD " '" :J C. 3 '" 5' - '" 5' -g ~ IV ~ " o ;a. ~ '" n- o. o (") c 3 CD :J ~ 4-.t. ...ll. .....lo. -" It'" r- r- r- an CIl CIl CIl ~ '" 00 ~ .j>. '" 01 0010 000 000 ~ ~ ~ '" ~<>>~ .j>. '" 01 0010 000 000 ...., 01 OJ a, 000) o 0 ~ 000 000 ~ ~ ~...., 01 co en 000) o 0 ~ 000 000 -0 ~ 3 CD :J - '" :J C. 'al 5' ~ 3 '" :J " CD c- o :J 0. c CD VI " :I. 'S. o' ::I D ~ c: ::I ;:; c: ::I ~ (") o o ... r} [ (") ~ ... c: ::I ~ (") o rn ... -i [ (") o VI ... ;0 '" c. 0' ;0 o '" c. s: (f) .., c "1)::j <3 '" a5' ~ g, ,,~ ::r_ ~'" CD " -)> =;0 r.., ~ '" C. en g '0 :i' 10 ':l .,' el. 0' :J I )> Z Z c: , )> CIl c: -0 m ;:a i5 ;0 )> o o m z o c s: ~ 16' 1 A10 N o - N N N N N en 01 .... "" N <- < G) m m c c C "U Z " "U "" <- CD " m m c: 0' ~ ~ ::> )( ~. c: < '" :T :T CD 0 3 0 0 ~ 3 ~ ~ c: Q) c- c- '" "" iii' iii' 0 C"l C"l ~ ~ ~ ~ cii :T iii' :i' :T CD z B: Q) ::> Q) c:j ;:l. '" ::> Q) :i' Q) or Q) G5 ::> 2,,: 0. "U (f) ~ (f) ~ CD Q) CD ::: ~ ::> '" g~ CD 0 Vi ~ ~1 or ::> q, "U ~ G) CJ CJ Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ CD '" CD 0 (f) ::> () () ::> ~ ~ a ",- Vi ~ <- ~. or ::: c: ::> ::> ::> CJ ::> '" 0. 0 0 CD '2' .... .... III " -I -I C"l CD 0' :!. ~ :T :T c: 0 0 '0 '" ~ ~ e!: ::> ::> 0 '" '" ::I "" "" "" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" -::> ::> -::> -::> .::> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "1 ~ ~ :T :r: :T ); - - - )( )( )( 3 N ~ ~ CD -I>; "1 OJ ~ 0' ~ 2 12 Q) ::> P- o. 0. " Q) ~ 3 '" 0 ~ ~ c: Q) v "" ~ 0 ~ ~ co -.J N '" N en co .... 0 N .... ~ N .... 0 m m m m m c Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) ::I ;:;: C ::I ;:;: C"l 0 III .... .... 01 "" "" - i:x> co 01 c.n c.n 0 0 -.J .... 01 -I 0 -EA lit -EA -EA -EA ~ -EA co -"" ~ N .... C"l -.... -.J "" -.... w 0 N .... .... 0 "" III -.J co :'l ~ ~ - N co co ~ 0 0 0 .... en 0 c ::I ;:;: C"l 0 III 01 !J' ~ "" N - Co 01 co :... N 0 0 0 co 01 -I 0 -EA -EA ~ ~ -EA -EA ~ -EA ~ 01 ~ N N C"l 01 a -.... ~ -.J 0 co -.J N co .... III -.J en :'l "" 01 - '" c.n co Co i::> 0 0 0 N 0 ... ;0 '" c. o' ;0 o '" c. s: Ul .... c -u~ a OJ ro' ->. U'? -u~ :::T~ ~ '" (1) -u -)> =;0 r.... ~ OJ c. en bl '0 :i' (0 =c ~ <0' !!l- o' => :r: )> z z c !; C/l C "ll m ;;0 o ;;0 )> o o m Z o c s: "! '" o - ~ ... "" "" "" "" w '" CJ~-~C:'1J-l..... , Cb 0 _ CD C/) 0 ,~. ~C/'J B<:J -..,~ ::::"cn CD=:mOW S<5i~O"~N~g -bCDi;:~Ill;OO" "'Cil~:;5'c8Ng 6 co ;:::;:::J 0. 0>'" -. 0" ::r ro+ -. (") -..!t. WI>> 1,.:;- .0> ~. ~v'l'g '!=!:; .0> 0 12..., -, "<;; NO ".. 12. 0" "'~ .;:l;o CD::r CD 01"'- "'- ~ n ::I. " _. CD 0." " = en ~ C/)fi5" Cb 0...... CD Cb :;S:~' "'en~ III 3- m ;0 a (J) CD' D3 3 -. CD I ~ cn <" -. ::;t g CD' "'" Cb 0" CD ::J \1,'''' :::.. -, :0 NO,)-')>-, 0)", "Q.o~o~&~~ wO>_:r-u~~:;: en en b (/J N Q). < -CD _1_N..... c)'::J. woo CJ1 C/J _CD =o~: ;~ L!!1 en !J ~ .0> ;0 m <CD' ~~CDO"'CCPCD_ a (f.)~g::J c:: a.nco c o ~ :::! a. -a s: :::::!. = ::J 2. =om.(j):f'o_ 0- n C'" cn Q) -. en 0 < :!:Ol~:=':;CDQ.3 Ill<_ OcnCD WNCD oen"o 3o:::Je!, CD '" -. 5' 0> 0 0 C'" o ~ C <0 en 0:1;; ~ OJor< "'CCD<~ ;0 =: ~ 5r::J. ~ 5. <0< enCben<o <; ::J CD ....... CD" @. <:; 0' 7' :; 8 o ~ 5 iii ~ so.!'; Om" ~~..::.. ~ .. g C/) 0" -i 5' CDOIll oQlQ<i5 o::rg." oeno< ........, - ... o (ii' III 0 en ;0 "'- Ol -::! ::r -. ~ < ''<lo..oI 5"(1') CD - en (") 0 CJ) - 0 0 '" III 0';'; ::J . ~ "":':CD en C/) CD 00-' ^ ..... ----.I _. () Q) -,:J CD::J'- _. =og ;o<enffi' :;-<."! :;~*o. s: ~~ ~ ::;" Cii :J C'" _. -< Cb .. Q.-< :Jep O()o.::;- Q) = I 0 ~~ ::!. '-- O. ~~ "::I, w~' c::: ~<nnlll 3" o-<::r"" 0" 0" 9 _ _ _. 0 oarl QO::J:J "~~ en ,<00 < '" . C/)en 0 ~-,.~ 5"-iO" <0.. cnOro~ CD co -1:::J1ll o-;;t ~-<oo ~:;;~ ;-.~o:O' o < -<.. :-s :;Ill .. m _. !:t. CD :::T CD N =r g (C :5' ~ ;0 rg iii!:. Ill.:;':" r2.'!=!!!.' E!2:g CbO-< 3 Ill' _ 'U 0"::::J01 -. ~ cP 0" ~ 0. -. 0 . en -< 0 '" o ~ 0> m III m III w w '" o o w (JI 0> o o .... 0> ....... "" o o o .... (JI 0> co 0> o o '" co (JI i::r> 00 w ~ "" N co .... .(JI co ~ w i::r> o .... (JI o '" 00 i::r> "" - ::r Cil III 0. en III 5"" Q.o. " -u 0. III Cb " ~o -" Ql Cb ar-u 0"" ::!. -a o - III Cb " (JI 0.'" ~~ ~ e ~~ . 5" <0 o o < CD ., ~ '" m m III III ~ '" w "" 0> i::r> 0 (JI 0 .... .... '" '" '" "" '" i::r> 0 (JI 0 '" 00 ~ w N '" "" "" .... .... ~ '" 0> ~ '" N N "" 00 o ~ c:: :::!. en <0 roe!. ~ -. 3 g 1ll,Q 3;E Q.R- 0.0 =0 " " .~ '!2. _. 5' i)l<o -< ~Ill CD- o.;ii :; ~ ;::;: := ::r 3' ~ III <: ~CD 0:; .. ::r :I> o 3 CD "" ~ "" o ~~ " - " Cb CU'3 a III " " ~ . CD ~ ~ ~ en -. ~a o _. _, 0 """ @ '" - ' o' :I> ~ ::;" . < ;0 III CD g CD''' ~ 3 - o Cil 5' CD en III -en ~CD !!l.< o' ~ " ;ii 0. . [~ < 0: CD ~ 3 III - Cb ~ iii' fij III " 0. iii' 0" o ~ o o " " CD a CD 0. 0' :7 CD < III <: CD en '" m III '" ~ ~ o o .... "" '" '" o o '" "" ~ w o .... "" CO o i::r> o 3 ~ ~ 2t " CD 03"3 a III " " ~ CD ~ ~ ~ (J) cO' ~ ~ o 0 -. " "" @ ,.... ~c.n o ' " -u ~ CD ;0 en CD ~ CD'~ ~ CD om -. (ii' " .... ~< ~Ill w< =:('1) 0' " -u o.a m. s. III 0. ~CD ~ " CD o Cb en en III -< - o 5' en - ~ 5' III o o o ~ 0. III " n Cb - o :7 CD '" m III w CO ~ o o .... '" 00 '" o o w "" co :..., (JI .... 0> CO ~ (JI o 3 III - CD ~ iii' fij III " 0. W 0" o ~ w w CO 00 ,,' =l CD cO' ~ III 8 "" " 0 " " ~~ .g' ~. a@ ,~' ~ en 5; .. Cb o (-, g::r " CD Cb 0 a'" CD" 0. Q. -" o en - .. ::ro CD , ~ < 0 ~o < -u ~ C/) o = E 15' !a. 5. CD 0. ~ 3"" III CD :5" c.. o~ c:~ =:00 " " CD Cil -. <0 " III ~" ~<o CD CD 0.:; :; .. _. ::r :7C/) -. 0 "::r III 03 ~o. 00. a ~ ".;t "" 0. CD < III III _. <:~ CD < O"~ o < ?<~ :; .. ::r C/) o I "" a -u < o " CD o CD en en III -< 0' 5' en - ~ " III o 8 ~ 0. III " o CD - o :7 CD ~ m III ~ 00 ~ o o .... ~ 00 ~ o o ~ '" o ~ "" .... ~ '" o t w '" 3 ~ III _ -~ ~ :J. -, <0 ~e!. en -. III 0 en " 3 clll !!l. S' Ol 0. _0 CD " ~~ Ql < _. III ~ <" _Cb ~O" iii'e "":; o 0 ":ll 0." ~" ~F. '" m III 0> W o o o ~ ~ N 0> o o o 0> a '" 00 a .... ~ '" ~ (JI OJ o w , :b III " <0 CD 0. o o " " CD a o' " < III <: Cb :!i. :7 ~ (JI , -, ::r ~ CD III 0. Cb 0. 8 " " CD o - o' " < III ;;:- .CD < III <: CD 0" o X CD en III " 0. ~ w w w w w w w C') CJ1 .,J:lt. W I\,) ~ 0 CbX)> :I>)>)>:I>",O"w o~ ~~~~ ,CD"': !!lGl GlGlGlGlC/)5i~ ~~. ...I. -" -. -. ("') CD N O'~ ~~I\,)N:J:a.,? ::'Gl GlGlGlGl~!!l.N mill WD)IllQ) -I\.) ~" ,5:.5:.5: ,5: -u ::r 0 ::r<O ~ ~ "=' ,.,. < CD 0 ~~ ~~~~ogiii' r2 ~. g, ~. g, g, &l a ~ Q. c. c. C. 0. 0. ~. en I\J ~~ @ @ g ~ ~ ~~ CD CDCD~~m.::J< ..., """"""""ro:30 S' :5':f:r:5" 0 ~ <C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD g.~ or or iii" iir Q) 3' :J " CD rorororocn 1m. 0. 0. a. 0. c.. ![ ""O~. 8 0 0 0 0 iii' 0::1. oooo_.CO a a 3. a 3. o' ~ ~ Q.Q.Q.Q.:J ~r :; :; ~. :; :; 3 @' ~. CD @' @' Q) en (J) (/) (J) en :5' ~ E~~5. S' m WWWQ) ro C'" C"' 0" c- 0" <::: CD CD CD CD CD s. :7 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' .., ..., ..., ..., ..., I a.. c.a.o.o. Q) @' @' @' @. ~. ~ U o.UUU 0 0" 0"0"0"0" g ~ ~~5i5i "U ![ ![![ iii' ![ "" ::l: i ~ [ [ i ~. &i' ~'~.~.~. ~ ... ---- Q) o' o' cr c5" cr :J ~ ~~~iE 0" I I I I I ffi OJ Gl;o -< s: -u C:CDCD~:T c: (1) C1> _0. 0 ~. ..a C/) ." :I> :; CD 5' f;;3 a Q (JI (C P <' ..., N CD $ ~ g t:5 C/) ~ " "'C..., a. s: III CD C/) III m ~!g' S' 2t OJ' CD 5' CD;:!.' CD III ::r 0. o CD CD ::r en " ~ .g :7 ~ :r ~ :J ~ = -I o (JI W 0> (JI ~ w o 0 a, w g) ~ .0> .0> ~ ~ "" c.n c.n .....lo. .....lo. o 0 01 0 r " r r r r r I " " " " " " o o CO o 0 p 0 0 00 0(:)-" -. en N CO CD 01 CJ'l .....lo. -...J .... "" 00 '" 00 (JI .... .... (flN~~ W CO-...Jc.oco W CJ'l W N I\.) {fl to CO (JI '" '" ~ 0 ~ .....lo. c.n CJ1 ....I. ~ 000 0 (JI 0 a o co o 0 9 9 9 (X) a 0 -" .....lo. c.n Co co co w W OJ 0 ~ ) ~ if T ") ~ ~ ~ , I!- It ~ p. if F.- ... m III Ii" "' 10 ~ ~ ~ .( ,- .- po If I" 'IT, ~ ~ , R ... m III !'-. ... .. :>. j- " ") 16 , 1 ~ ;:0 ;:0 !l:lC5 :I> -i o z 3C )> -i m ;0 :; r- C/) .. " ( ,": - , ... m III c CD '" '" ... ii' .... 0' j o -< c " ;:;: c " ;:;: o o '" .... I )> Z Z C -i S; o ~ o o '" .... c j ;:;: o o '" .... -i o ~ o o '" .... AI0j ;0 " Q. ci' ;0 o " Q. s: en -< c '1J=i a ro ro"-'o ll'? '1J~ :::r~ g: '" (I)'1J -:>- =;0 r-< !!l ro Q. "' o " 'C ,i' co " ::!. co Et o' ::! C/) C 'tJ m ;:0 5 ;0 :>- o o m z o c s: ~ G'l ::tI o c: z o C) CIl s:: :c o me)> < ::tI :c s:: m ::tI CIl CIl CD ~ CD ::J o I\> CIl :r en en en ::tI N -J. 0 C III CIl s:: :c c I\> ::J' 3 iD ~ i5- iir ~ CD ::J ~ f9. 8- CD I\> 0 ~ @ ~ 0.R <: iil ~ ~. " o 3. ~ s:: ~ <" 5- OJ ~ <" ::j, CIl G) " w ..., ~. ::E I\> CD IJ> er 1J IJ> C I\> IJ> 3" ::J' CD :;I: o V> ~ V> ~'&J~ 0" 0" 0" ::J ::J ::J ~ ~ ~ q q ~ X -J. ~ OJ ... 9- ~ ... N <Xl .I>- CJ1 N .I>- <Xl .I>- (0 m m m I\> I\> I\> ~ N ~ CJ1 ~ <0 <Xl CJ1 ~ 0 {fl.-69 * V> ~ N NU,Cn ~ ..... 0 N W .I>- ~ co tv o .I>- 0 ~ o CJ1 P' (:) 0, co o 0 CJ1 1:5~1:5 0,0,0> <Xl V> N o N en 000> o 0 CJ1 CJ1 CJ1 CJ1 CJ1 CJ1 CJ1 CJ1 (0 <Xl ..... en CJ1 .I>- W ~ ri1 CIl ::tI -I s:: C o s:: 1J m () G) z ~ < CIl ::tI o ~ ~ 9 9- 0 I\> 0; ::::: =r - - CD _. ~ 0 ~ Q) W ::3 ~3-CD er 0 3 I\> ? ::J CD (f) ,:::- 8' iil o ro - !!l. 3 I\> I\> ? I\> ::J III -I s:: r- ~ ~!l1 ~ CD r:; CD C" 0 en c = _ ffi' Q) a o ~ CD3 ~ g: iii' IJ> 0. o _. z !:e. ~ w ~ ~ - o' D:l g. ~ ~ ~. 5' S!,? ~ CD CD ..." " s:: () 001\> ~ ::J er ~~l 1J 3 CD I\> 3" ~ ~ 1J 3 I\> 3" ." G) 0" 0 5: 5: I\> gJ ::tI -I ~ 2 e!.~ 1J CD I\> - - -I 3 ~ CD CD CIl Z o I\> C - _ 0 ::J' ::J' CD CD 3 N s:: Q .!l1 ~ ::; CD ~. ~ III 3- iD ....l. ....l. ....l. ():) ~ ~ 0 . oo:l~ I\> }ll ~ . N ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ q "1 o 0 I\> III X X ~ OJ ~ ~ 0. 0. 3 3 I\> I\> - - o 0 ::J' ::J' ~' ~. ....l. g I\J N ~~~01 ~~~~ er e!.!il. o 3 o I\> ::tI ::tI - - CD 0 1J 1J 0. ::J' G) G) g ~. Q Q - ::J' CD I\> 0. ~ ~ c c ~ ~ J\JO>UJ....l. -J.....l. ....l. -.....J 0) ....... W W 0) m m m m m m m I\> I\> I\> I\> I\> I\> I\> ....l.....l. ....l.....l.....l.-l. ..... <Xl (0 V> CJ1 N .I>- CJ1 en ~ CJ1 <Xl CJ1 <Xl 00..... 0 0 0 0 o 0 CJ1 0 0 0 0 .,.. .oEfl....l.** .Efl* (..) N (...) I\J -Efl ....l. N ~-:"'tnN.I>-mW ~(j)CO<.o-..JNcn 0'1 N ....l. CJ1 .,J!l. 0"1 co 000 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 ....l. -" ....l. ....l. ....l. ....l. ....l. en CJ1 CJ1 (0 .I>- .I>- <Xl <Xl .I>- CJ1 0 0 CJ1 0 0000000 000 0 0 0 0 .,.. -Efl....l. -Efl * -Efl-Efl VJ 0 CJ1 (.0.) ....l. N U,Wc.nN~O>OO N -J. co (...) N co co co co 9 0 0 0'1 0 000 0 000 000 0 000 CJ1 N C <- r- ~ CD ~ IJ> - a CD 3 iii' s: C IJ> '" ~ CD CD. <- I\> - ~ ~ ::J' I\> ::J ~ CD ~ ~ 3 III s:: C IJ> ,.. ~ CD CD () @ CD ~ ;:l. iD CIl 2, ~ <- I\> - @. ::J' I\> 1J I\> - o' -I ~ CD CD ~;;:; c . I\> 0 -.1\> s:: c "" T' - ~ '" IJ> 5' (0 iD -a iil ::J - ~ ~ 0 N ~ N.... 01 Si o' ~ (0 -Q)c:~ 3:::e!.~ S. ::J' - - I' - - ~ '" in 5' (0 iD -a iil ::J - I\> - I\> - er I\> IJ> CD ;0 1J G) o ~ er I\> IJ> .CD ;0 1J G) o ~ ~ N .I>- V> m m I\> I\> ~ ~ N ~ <Xl en o 0 o 0 .,.. .,.. ~ N ..... m (0 en N <Xl o 0 o 0 ~ <Xl o o o ~ N o o o .,.. N CJ1 N o o o .,.. N -..... en o o o CJ1 ~ -I > ::tI r- m -I m m CIl-::tI z CIl > '< -I 3 m "'ll !i: z -I 3: > -I m III ::tI ~ i> :J !;; 0' _ !!!. ." Z S' I>> e!. 3 (I) ~ (I) n 3i n I>> C!: o :J III lil ., C) ~ o I>> 3 :J 3 12. o I>> :J a Z III I>> n 3 ::J' (I) [ c ~ "'ll I>> :J - C :J ;:;: 5l 0' (I) III CIl S' -g :J n n 3i [ ~ CD g. ~ :J I>> en a IE III g, 3 x' C" I>> n ,.. m ::!l III - o'lil ~ .., III lil c n S: S; n I>> .... 0' :J IJ> s:: ~ ;!:: ~ '" IJ> 5' (0 iD -a iil :J - !!!. er III IJ> CD ;0 1J G) C :J ;:;: C) o ~ -I [ C) o III - C :J ;:;: C) o III - -I [ C) 5l - - - r- - - - CJ1 o ~ m 1J CD ~. a C') !e. < 3i S' c: CD (0 CD 0. N ,- -. 0 CD :J::J - t2. CD ~ g: 8 ::J' ~ ::J m ~ ~ <' ~Q.CD o < ~I\> IJ> I\> CD <: a m a < 2. ~ CD ::J' -a 0. <1>::J. g ..., :J __ 3 CD '" () III CD CD ..., 3 CiJ g ~ CD - CD'.iil ::J 0. ~ (j) -5' 0 Q) ;;1 _. 0 en w ~ C ~ cO' ~ < a -.J CD -. ~ 0.0 01 . :J ::J - g. ~ 5' g, (0 !!!. ~ o' 0. ::J o 0 s=~ ~ III 0. ;:l. ::l. 3 -a <1> IJ> ::l "0 '"" <1> N o 0 iii' iil .;f 0 < 0 I\> a <" Q. CD IJ> < III <: <1> o ::J <1> C ::l ." ~ <1> 3 o < e!. ;0 ffi. c ~ ::l - o o ::E ::l <1> ~ CD iD 3 <1> ::l - IJ> ~ m III -I o !: III I>> III CD III is: <Xl CJ1 o o .,.. .... ..... N N .... Cl1 Q N .,.. <Xl CJ1 o o .,.. N ~N <II to N o ..... CJ1 o w in o en .I>- CJ1 CJ1 o o .,.. CJ1 CJ1 o o .I>- to G) ~ <1> CD ::l o o 0" ~ CD :::b CD o - :C' <1> 53 < CD 3 <1> ::l - .I>- <Xl 1J::J'-1 III '< 0 -0..., 3 ~ 0 _~ ~ U'1 1_ 0 ..... ~?O CD;og' c: CD ::I. o-(D'ct> er..,1J> ror-+cn ~ 0 ::J' ~"2.2 '0; I\> er ..., ~ Q) -ero. m C Q) CD er'O .g-S!:1D III <1> ~ -~::E 3 0. _. <1> - O'cn::T ..., to' ""Tl ~ ::l CD <1> III 3-CIl -. CD ~. Q -. :::J oJ -. -, 0 <1> ,:2 ::J' IJ> ~I\>'O =r::1m CD .." IJ> CD 0 IJ> IJ> ~ C ~ er ~ Ql C CD 3 g: 8 !" CD 3 ~'o ::J <1> o ::J ~~ <1> 5' IJ>(O N' ::!:l CD 0 0.0 <1>0. !!!.~ (0"0 ::l <1> ~O" o C ::J er . er NCD ~ ~ CD::J C 0 erN erti -<1> CD _ CiI Q -a CD ~ 5' 0. 1r I\> - CD 0. a1 ~ 2. III ::J ~ C ::J ." IJ> ~ ~ !!l. <1> III o ::J' IJ> c: <1> o - 3 <1> 0. iii' ::J -I ~ <1> S::!P.. I\> 1J (Oe!. ::J Q.3 iii' cn C <:;'0 <1>"0 ~ iD Qo~ ;oa o III '< - III N ..... N N V> m m I\> I\> :I'- to ~ to V> <Xl ~ CJ1 en o 0> CJ1 en I," I ,." I .I>- ..... 0.-1 <1> 0 ~. a o CD CJ1 IJ> ..... . 0 ;ON <1> , CD'~ ~ N _"0 o ' "!2.~ I\> "'ll ~~ ~ ' ::J .m o CJ1 f:j ..... -0 CD N ~. en N <1> CD ~ Qo iii' IJ> 8 ~ < N <1> ' ~ :c ,!l1 cO' CD ::J' 53'8 =:'0 <1> ' ~ c ::J'O IJ> -a ~ III '< ::J' CD I\> 0. IJ> ::E ." ::J' "0 ~ er C "" , 5' -a ~ <1> IJ> IJ> C ~ <1> ~ <1> (0 C ~ 5' (0 III ::J 0. X , " 0" ::E IJ> ::J' S- o =ll .l>- V> o m I\> N P CJ1 V> .,.. <Xl 0, N ..... <0 o N N <0 W .I>- en 8 -I < Q <1> 0 ~ ~~ <1> '? ~~ :;1:, CD ~ ~ N ?~ , m V> .I>- o CIl <1> ::!. <1> IJ> :c cO' ::J' -a o -a , C "0 a - III -< (0 <1> III ~ 0. ~ :C' <1> ::J' CD III 0. ::E ." ::J' -a C ~ -a iD o o 0" ~ o III '0 ;0 <1> CD' ~ - o -a iil ::J 0' .., ::l o N N iD IJ> N' <1> III ::l . 0. ~ N to m I\> .l>- N o o <II CJ1 -:". ~ <Xl o o .l>- N 0> W .,.. CJ1 -:". to to '" ..... 161 1 ~ N , .I>- CJ1 ~ 0' o.a 8 x < "'ll CD V> ,91 8 CD' 53~ :;I:~ <1> N ? ~ X 1J , V> o o CIl <1> ~ iii' IJ> CJ1 ~ m I\> CJ1 .I>- o o .,.. 1'> ..... CJ1 .I>- o o .l>- N 0> V> .,.. N ~ ..... :I'- ~ w ~ ~ :c cO' ::J' -a o -a , C -a ~ o - III -< (0 CD III ~ 0. ~ ,,' CD ::J' <1> III 0. ::E ." ::J' -a C ~ -a iD o o 0" ~ o III " ;0 <1> CD' ~ - o "0 iil ::l 0' ~ ::l o N N iD IJ> N' CD o (I) III n .., -5' - 0' :J o ~ C :J ;:;: C :J ;:;: C) o UI .... -I o Iii C) o III ... C :J ;:;: C) o III .... -I o !: C) o III .... AI0. ;:0 '" c. 5' ;:0 o '" c. s: Ul ..... c -u=i a CD (j).-\. u? -u~ ~~ ll:'" '" -u -:>0 =;:0 r-l !ll CD C. <J> !l 'C :S' <0 :: .0' el. 5' => :J: > Z Z c r- > CIl C "'ll m ::tI o ;0 :>0 o o m Z o C s: '" ~ 16 f 1 A 1 Ol '" 9, ~ ... ...... '" '" '" '" '" ~ '" 0 (0 co ...... '" 01 '" c... <: ~ m m m c c c c OJ OJ "tl Z " "tl '" N en Gl c... " m m m OJ OJ c: <1l (';- ~ a 6 0 0 :J X c: ~ ~ 2' < '" :J" :J" :J" CD 0 3 0 0 0 III III ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ or 5' c: III c:r c:r c:r '" "" iir or Dr ~ ~ 0 n n ~ :J" :J. ~ ~; ci> cD III (i) 5' III :J" 1:0' rb. III CD Z ~ III :i :J III cj ::l. ;0 5' CD '" :J III III 0 0 (ji' III Gi 5' :J '" c: (i) :2..: Q. CD_ CD :J -0 en ~ en ::I: c... ~ CD III CD ::;: CD_ 0 ~ :J :J" '" ~. CD :J 0 iii' CD '" ~1 -t: "'_ or 0 :J :J_ 0, "tl (i) Gl 0 ~ -j ~ 0 III CD ~ :J" ::;: ~ x !!!, 5' '" CD 0 III 0 en :J () () () c: =l. :J ~ ~ a ~ CD OJ ",- '" ::;: 0 ::I: 0 c... ~. or :J :J ::;: CD ~ 0 c: :J :J 0 :J '" Q. 0 0 CD 0 ~ III l/) 2' .... .... 5' " -j -j .... n CD o' :J" :J" -j OJ ~ ... ~ :J" '5' c: 0 0 0 0 or '" ~ ~ ~ ... :J :J ~ 5' '" '" :J '" III ::s 5' :=;. (i) III ~ W W q q ~w '" w ~ ~ ~ "tl "tl c:CC ~ ~ III ?l- 0 ~o 0 0 0 r+ 0 0 .:J :J _:J ~ ~ :J :J :J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "1 ~ ~ ~ I\,l I\,l :J" ;i' ;i' - ! :J" ~ Q. :J" - - X - -x x ~ x x :t> x ~ ~ q ~ ~ 3 ~ '" '" "1 q CD '" , , ~ ~ - ~ !) !) {g o' '" Q. III 1:l Q. Q. Q. Q. :J Q. . " )> III ~ 3 3 '" CD 0 ~ ~ ~. ~ :J c: " ~ III ~ 3 '" 0 ~ '" ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ (0 ...... N 0, N 0, 01 01 ~ co "'" 0 N 0 "'" 0 ~ N "'" 0 0 0 (0 m m m m m m m m c: III III III III III III III III ::s ;::;: -j 0 c: > ::s ;::;: r- ("') :t> 0 !:j '" N "'" 01 W W '" :" ...... ... 'II: 0 Co 00 '-.J ...... '-.J 01 :".. - co ex> 0 0 N 0 0 ex> YO -j 0 -..r YO ~ co Y> YO Y> ~ Y> Y> Y> Y> Ol "'" -'" ~ N -"'" 01 -"'" '" () N "0 co ".!>. (0 01 01 0 "00 0 co co co 0 '" '" 01 01 0 l/) '-.J '" (0 '" ~ co 0 0 -..r ... ~ w Q:, co :".. 0 0 w '" N ex> 0 0 0 0 0 N c: ::s ;:;: ("') 0 '" 01 '" 01 '" N '" '" '" ... Co 0. Co :".. N :".. 0. 0. 0 0 0 co 01 co 0 0 YO -j 0 ex> YO Y> ~ :-J ~ Y> Y> ~ Y> Y> YO Y> ~ 01 ~ .!" .!" 01 '" W ("') (0 "0 ".!>. N 0, W N 01 ~ -..r 0 ex> co -..r N (0 "'" N ~ 0 '" Co -..r !J' -..r '" 01 0 ~ ex> ... Q:, 01 00 Co 0 0 0 0. -..r 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 ;0 " c. ci' ;0 o " c. s: (f) -l C -u=i a CD co' .... nO ;;6, ::r~ ~ '" '" -u -)> =;0 r-l ~ CD c. '" n " '0 5' <0 ~ ~ cO' !It o' " :I: )> Z Z c: > en c: "tl m ;0 o ;0 )> o o m z o c s: ~ '" o - ~ ~ ..... o ..... )> r- III )> en m + )> r- r- )> r- ..... m ::tJ z )> ..... m en ." '" o '" i-.> ~ Ol <0 <Xl N klg> :..,." N" "'.;: ()lll ,.,:l _0. N::!l "-Jill II CO ~ ~ . III ~ 0. COCD Olll ()" -<~ + ~ NCD coo. "-J::!l ()= -<0 1;;:)0 O1a ~~ II 3 .....CD Sl,&. III III :""';"'~ ~CI> :".." <Xl CD "-J~ ().:;:l -<" @. s:: CD 0. iii' :l -0 ~ CD " o CD - ~ o :l en ::r CD CD - ~ :".. <Xl "-J () -< ..... o ..... )> r- )> r- ..... ;t .... ." ~ ~ N o N ~ U. N Ol N o ." ~ Ol '" 01 .I>- ~ o N Ol o o ." ~ ~ ~ '-.I '" co o o ." '" <Xl '" Ol N o o B.5 .I>- s:: -0 0 III _ CI> 0 CI> ~ CD co ~ W Sl, 0. o CD ~ III g a 3 g, ~ CI> ~. 2. CI> N 0" ~ ~ ~ ~ 0- III 0. 0 ~ ~ ::r -.. CD 0 x Ei o 0- ~ 0 ....l. ~ 0; CT CD o a ~ :E III 0 o c: ,..- ~ 0- s;, III o :l c: 0. ~ g Q. ~ - <Xl 0 '" @ .I>- :J co CD en ~ .2J':3: co '0 <Xl "-J en .::!J r , 01 "-J <Xl W .I>- co en ,., x ~ ~ ~ OJ o CD " - ::r ~ II , , N N Q ~ @. - 0' :l CI> Ci' ~ ~ o o '*- ~ 3 o ~ CD ~ @' - 0' :l CI> III CI> :l CD CD 0. CD 0. - o 3 III 3' or 3' rg ~, CD $1 III CI> :E CD CD 0. ~ CD :E ;+ ::r 3' 3 CD 0. iii' :J CI> 0. c: ~ ~. o o :l CI> - ~ c o - 0' :l 3 CD 0. iii' :l CI> (0 "-J :".. w Ol en ,., o -.. 3 CD 0. iii' :l III ~ CD ~ )> r- ..... ~ m ::tJ z ~ m en =i m o m i: o r- =i o Z -0 ::tJ m -0 )> ~ ..... o z )> z o 0 :J 0 gl en CD -0 S2. 0 r- en , )> 2! r- b .... -0 iii' :l a: g III :l 0. ~ s:: CD () &. o III :l :l or m $1 x o ::r III CD < a- ~ cr 0' Ci ::J CD III ~ ~ @. ~ g: OJ o ::I Q) ;' en g: x :l a !en g' m OJ 0 III CD ::r _ Dr ~ Gl ~ III CI> CI> :E ;+ ::r 3' ., ., ~. III - 0' :l :l m g o o o c ., m :l Q: o :E ~' m c 3 3 CD ., ... ., o 3 co n "-J c :".. ., '" 0- Ol n o :l en m ,., !:l' c n - ~b ..... )> r- )> r- p ..... o ;t 01 N ." ." .I>- ex. "-J ~ <Xl o o "-J 01 ." "-J W o "-J "-J o o '" o ex. .I>- "-J o o co 01 o o ." W <Xl o o o "-J ~ N .I>- ." N <Xl .I>- ~ "-J <Xl "-J "-J :::f'Sl.-, o r::::: :::!. 3C1>CO -eta ill" 3 g' 3lll.o III 2, C 5' cr o' S'~8 _CD :r c: :J _~ "0 o _. g :J~(C CD_< CD !:H.. Q) o.1D- -0.< o CD ~ :;,--.. o :;:. :z < -. < Q::Jf!J.. CD III < III ~CD 3 0:;, ~ - III 0 ::r -, C :l :J )> ==0.0 :J < 3 CD III CD ~<:T < CD iil -. C"" tu g 0 a. _?<(J) CD ~ III CD - :l . ~ a. c:-o o.lll CD :l ::!l_ ;:;:0 CD :l ~ CD Dl'-o o-c :::!. -a o _ III CD :J 01 o.N CON Ol() < - ~g ,..- () 3' OCO :J 0 :l 0 CD < n~ on CD 0 X :l -, :l !!l.CD ::i" n co CD :J 0. -o'a " - -::r CD CD 5'< III III -c:- CD CD ~m CD :J 0. (Jl ~ ~. III - 0' :l ~ c'i' ,..- o o ~ ~' < III c:- CD ,..- ~ :E - m :E ;;:' ~ .~ - o 3 III - o ::r .g c'i' ,..- 8 ~ il' < III c:- CD @ CD o 31 CD 0. ~ ~ ~ fE' III - 0' :l () o :l @ o o '" .I>- ~ co m III m III ~ "-J W o o ." '" i-.> <Xl "-J o o <Xl '" i:n .I>- ." ~ U. <Xl ~ ~ Ol """.I .............. ....... ....... Ol 01.1>- W N ~ 3, ~ ! :;. ~ ~ :r '" iil ?). "; l;;J: 3 "l !!l. co ? 2: 5' ? 3' ~ :i !!l. (jj' () 'H ~ () o'~a-:J cna-m moQ;::;:Q) ~Dror 8 0 _. Q) () -. .-+ - 'lJ CD CD en O:J (() :JCI> :rm-Omo.3(Jl :loCI> ""CD~-\.:T:T c;; -\. -\. 2'8 ~~~~~ ~o~ ~g ~ g g cg ~ (jj' C -0 (ii' ~ 0 -0 -, 0 (f) :i'!!!' (f) CD "":l<""1il.....<@o-o ~cEo 0. 8 cE 0. () cE !!!. ::r () 0. CD;o CI> m ;0 '!2. III - Qi 3' _.2 (jj' s:: if Iii ~ &l ~ ~ or CD 3. <" - 3. ~ ;::+ CD ;.+ CD W :J C -\. ~a.COCD~C'O::3CDg.~a.o, ::J=m ~.-(Jl.aCTOnaCD3Q)a.o a-o~ _. -. CD ::J ::I m ~ en 0 0 ~ ::J 0 a. en' _. ~ _ ~ CT (C ..., row:J. CD:J:J cn_~. '<..., coeoW CD ::!'; W 0 3 - 0 - 5' Q) c:f s:: <0 Ii ::!';Q)oo-c.... -5: Cf)Ct>O CD :J 3 ::J _. C'" (1) 0 =r 0 CD...,- w<m co:Jeo :i' ep- a.=j"~ ~ ~ S' ::!)"C...., 5i - 0) ~ Q) 8 c: 0.<_ ::+iil~CDO <c :l III ~ CD S' :i' en I:='" Q. 0 CD ar e:::J"'" o :e CD (Q en Dl 0 oS 3....., 0 c' C/) ::l -. en c: 0 ..... .... (f) ~ _ a:fur -'(i)CDo.~~ :fer ::J~CiJ c :l Q. 8 (,. -, CO !l!. CD CD::!::l :::loa :J::To:::l=: _:J moce a. ::J -. ::::J CD ...., - _. ::T co ~::J:T < ..!, 0 CD 0 :J ::T:T CD:;: 0 :E_. :r DlCi)':J o^mCD_ ro <" -. < '-+"'0 CD CD..., x:r: g:T ~ CD :J III -0 0 a. < w -. 0 M V co <" -. en ro::J ~ -0 ...., 101.I m C"enCD .-+:::J_:Jen -.0)..9: 0--' ::T(to.-+;::;': ::Jm !e.Q)~ x CD3;o CDCD '0' C" ~ Q' ~ 0 0 0 (Jl . C1> X I CD ~ W ;: ~ ro ~ S' en"2. (j;'o~""'.-+- co:r Q..-+cc .c Q:l eo CD::Teo Q:lco (j)C'" c:O :J !e.mw e. CDOO Q:l CD co ""0 Q CD ~ g 0 =2 m ::;. en CD lJ (J) CD ~. CD ::;.;:::;. tA CD ~. < - a. en.-+ 0 CD u' 0 ~!e. 0= C/)e.tA ~ Sl ~~g: - -. .c CD ::J 0 -. -. CD -. ::J .g ~ E- 5: ;: ~.~. ~ g ::s.~. ~ CD < C" ::!) cr 3. ~ en ~ CD CD OJ :llll -CDCOCD &lOJ :l30 5' ~ g ~ E::CD ~ on :::J 0 g. -. CD co .-+ 0 ::J"'" a.en. (')00 1"O~::::J::::J o~ .-+.-+ 0- ::lCDm ::J '-+-0 00 ::J:E 0 C/) ::::J (') CD C" C" C" :J;::;.: eno.w(') CD~ CD CD CD::T ::J c: CD en.~. c: _ C C o CD....,~co3co- '.0 ""z roCD w. tAU) 0_. o.co en::!) CDte mCD :JC" .-+0) n:::: CLCD o.CL - 0 Oc Ill-' Q):r DO> :::!J 0 "0 co ::J::J ::::J CD ::J C/l Q:ls: -,m ::J~ a."'" ';:W ~ as ~. ~, sa. 0' Q~' 5' ::;~ (tl ~ a...... C""'" :J 0 .-+ ::::!. o.co CD::r CDo CD:l ::rco o. ID(J) c:0 CD...... rom 0;0 (no tA:J a.C: (De 5~ CD~ ~~ on. <0 ~ in S. ~ III ~ C" (5" ~ ~ e.O 00. ::J::J m:J .-+Q:l o Z CD CD 0. co :E ::r _. ::J. (0"'" "'Co ;::.: Q)::::J !1'0> m-<" Q:l- ::T ::0' "'O~ .."O;::1.~ m ::T"'" ...., <0 -. m 0 c.n a. CD 3 o en ~ ID -, ~'CD CD < ~ -. .-+ ~ 101.I X -, CD Q)"'" ::T 0'1 0 a. ~ ffi' CD ~ m 0 ~ ~ ~. ~en 0.< CDC/) - ::J.-+ '-1~ .~ ~~ Q co 0 5' -II. CD co ~ (Jl .I>- ~ <Xl "-J 01 o "-J 01 o .I>- r ,., m III m III r ,., r ,., 01 ~ N o o ~ <Xl "-J o o "-J .I>- o o 01 <0 o ~ N '-.J o ." N ~ <Xl o o ." '" w Ol Ol o o ." .I>- :".. N 01 o o ." co U. N 01 o o ." N co Ol o o W <Xl "-J i:n Ol ~ Ol co o '" 01 N N o ~ N o N W co ." ~ U. 01 o i:n .I>- ." '" '0 .l>- N U, .I>- ." ~ ." N o <Xl ex, o ." co o o o o "-J co N U, o 16' 1 )> r- .......... ~m ::tJ g. !1;; "l Z CDO )> .-+ :E -II. -f OO>Nm c :l 0 :;; :::I (') r tIN " CD -II. ;::0 :lo-NG') ~a.~)> :lCO()..... c!lDTO :l CD m Z CD 0. (Jl ~ Ci' N 3: CD ...., 0 ~ 0" 0 ..... .-+ ...., -0 m ~ ~ < ::tJ Q. a: () )> ...., -'CO g cE III !j; 3lllfli.1-, (Jl :l CD ..... fii'< =: 0 :::J ...., ...., tn @.{g cE' ~c_ en ~, a . ....,_. mOlD lll:J 3 :l 3 CD E:: m ::s Q ::j" .... c CD :i' UJ x CD CD Ci), 0 ~~. -tt co :;: CD x 3 :r (ii' III III _ :i" a. :i" ;:,01Q ill 0 ~ 30m o "'0 S' &. a 3 ~~. 8 gY' a :J -0 "'0 (Jl III -:J :l ::r_ CD III 0 :l -:> lit 3 CD -. -0 ~ co c - ::r ~ _ -" ::T g1DCD :J 01 CD CD N < CDNlD o.();a CD" :l 0. s:: lD=: o.lll c -. :::!.:l 3 :J = ~ cc~S' o 0. ., o m Ar ~ "0 ;;; "' - .' =;::r cwo- ~ 0> ~ o '0 :l 3 CD :l CD CD 0. CD S: N '" 01 o r ,., '" N o ." :-J 01 N o o o ~ ex, .I>- t w N .I>- o o o lD m n ., -a o' ::J B c:: ::J ;:;: c:: :l ;:;: (') o VI - r) [ (') o m ... c:: ::J ;:;: (') o CI> - ..... o [ () o VI - A 10. ;0 ll> C. o' ;0 o ll> C. s: (j) -i c "U=l a OJ ro'~ " 0 ;;0, ::r~ ~ '" ro "U -l> =;0 r-i ~ OJ c. en ~ 'C :i' cc :j" cO' 2l. o' :J :I: )> z z c:: r- )> en c:: 'tl m ::tJ o ::tJ l> o o m z o c s: .. ~ '" So ~ ... CIl o 8: <-. o ~ :J II> o .:J ~ :; (!) II> II> ro Cil :J C. Ol ro :J. :T Ol -'" 1J c: n ~ Ol II> 5' ea )> ea (!) ;? 1611 3-):>-ICIlCll""ro ~..., -c: :;:=.-. 3amaO'"~Q. -'Illi':(!)8(!)ro CQ < '< 3 :1. 0 OJ;::o: CD a!!::J =_ClJ:;I-"a. OoDJ_Q):=. :J-'CD'oSlm ):> (").., - 0 :J ::tffi" m(;lS, -'-. )( m 0.3 -0 0 ~ S' ~ E" ;:+(0 ro' CD CIl i': Cil Iii (!) 2' '" III '" III r o ~ OJ c: '" :; (!) '" '" c m " .. -5' .... o' ::l g c: ::l ;:;: c: ::l ;:;: C'l 0 III .... -I 0 ~ C'l 0 III .... c: ::l ;:;: C'l 0 III .... -I 0 ~ C'l 0 III .... A 101 ;0 Ol C. o' ;0 o Ol c. s: CIl -I c 1J=1 a ro (D'o !)., 1J~ ~~ Ol '" ~1J -)> =;0 r-l g: ro c. II> o Ol 'C 5' ea :f <.0' !!l. o' :J :J: )> z z c: ~ en c: " m ;0 6 ;0 )> o o m z o c s: ~ , 16 r 1 A 1 01 en o - ~ ... c: ::l ~ ;:;: ~ 0 c.n 0 N N ~ W N W W W ~ N a a 0 ~ 0> 0> ..", N N 0 N N c.n ..", 0 0 0 1/1 0> 00 00 0 ~ 0> 0 0 c.n c.n ~ 0 ~ c.n 0 w c.n 0 0 0 ... 0 0 0 0 c.n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c.n 0 0 0 0 -l ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ co :!- "" N "" N c.n ..", 0> c.n ~ w c.n "" w 0 ~ ~ 0 c.n 0 0 w a c.n c.n a, ~ ~ w c.n 0> Co N c.n ~ ~ ~ N a a 0 N ..", 00 w co 0> N 0 N ..", 0 0 c.n c.n c.n N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N "" 0 9 0 c.n c.n 0 0 0 0 0 c.n 0 9 0 1/1 ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c: ::l ;:;: "" N 0 N N ~ W ~ W N N ~ W ~ Co 0 ~ co co 0> N c.n "" N N W N N ..", ~ 1/1 "" ..", ..", f'" c.n 0> 00 00 9 "" N ~ w f'" N "" ~ 00 P" ... '" ~ ~ co ~ 0 en en ..", co 00 Co ..", ..", '" 0 co ~ co N ~ 0 0 ..", w co "" "" N 0 ~ "" c.n w 00 ..", ..", 0 c.n 0> -l 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ .0> W W W "" .!" 0> 0 c.n c.n ~ "" _w w w w ~ ~ "" N 0 ..", co ..", 0> ~ ..", N 0 ~ c.n "" t c.n ~ a a w w ~ Co 0 0> co 0> 0 ..", w ..", 0 00 N c.n 00 w "" "" N N ..", "" 1/1 c.n 0> 0> "" "" "" ~ 00 c.n w 00 c.n 0 N co 00 ~ 00 0> N ... 0 0 en N w ~ ~ 00 Co w ~ N 0 N W ~ c.n ~ Co N 0 0 0 Ol N ~ "" 00 N 0 W N 0 N "" 0 c.n 0 c.n Ol I c: ::l ;:;: c.n ~ 0 w "" ~ "" N ~ N N ~ 00 w ~ 0 ~ w "" c.n ~ N co W w 00 c.n 0 c.n 0 1/1 co ~ co 0> ..", ..", ..", co ?> ~ "" ..", c.n c.n ..", ". N N 0 0 ... en Ol en 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ w Co ..", Co ~ ~ N 0 0 '" 0 0 w w w c.n co co c.n 0 c.n c.n 0 c.n 0 0 c.n ~ 0 0 0 0 -l 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ "" c.n ."" ."" Ol W ..", .0 c.n ..", ~ N .w W "" .!" ~ ~ c.n ~ 0 ~ N co ~ ~ w 0 ~ ~ a 0> c.n ..", N W c.n ..", 00 w ~ 0 "" 0 0 "" ..", 0> ..", 0 0 0 ..", ..", 0> co 0 Ol 00 0 c.n 0 1/1 c.n 9 ~ 0 ~ w 00 co 0 f'" "" w Ol c.n 0> ~ 9 N 9 0 ... 0 N en Co ..", 0 0 00 en ~ ~ w ~ en ~ N 0 '" 0 0 0 0 ..", 0 Ol ~ c.n 0 0 c.n 0 c.n 0 0 c.n 0 0 0 0 0 c: ::l -. ~ N ... c.n c.n 0 0 w w ~ "" N W "" W ~ a a 0 0 ~ N N c.n c.n w co 0 co "" c.n 0 0 0 1/1 co co co c.n Ol 0> c.n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "" 0 0 9 0 ... 0 0 0 0 '" c.n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -l 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Iii ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ N W :!- "" w c.n N Ol ~ c.n ..", ~ c.n 0> c.n W N ~ c.n _c.n .0 0 c.n 00 c.n 00 w Co 00 -"" -"" a, 0> a ~ ~ N ~ ..", a 0 0 0 0 Ol 00 ..", c.n ~ N "" 0 c.n ~ co ..", 0 0> N 00 c.n 0 0 0 1/1 9 0 ~ 0 0> 00 c.n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 ... 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIl -l m < m z CIl IlO > -< -l o Z o o ~ r CIl )> Z o CIl )> ;0 ~ N o ~ ~ r r m -< o ;0 m CIl -l ;0 III a. o' ;0 o III a. ;;: en .., c -o=l a OJ ro'c;. $)., -o~ ;:r~ m '" <1>-0 -J> =;0 r.., !!l OJ a. "' " III '0 S' co ~ ~ us' 2l. o' :J J> o o m z o c ;;: ":l: ~ 16 '1 A 1 0' to 8- ~ .... c: ::] ;:;: (') 0 UI C1> C1> C1> W W .... i::> c.n i::> (" (" 0 0 0 0 0 --I 0 ~ ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5.11 ~ N .j>. (') "" 0 ~ N N 0 ex> "" c.n C1> "" UI .j>. C1> N .j>. 0 .... i::> c.n i::> i::> i::> 0 0 0 0 0 c: ::] ;:;: (') 0 UI C1> C1> ~ .j>. ~ .... :".. :".. "" (" c.n N N ex> ~ ~ --I 0 ~ ~ 6t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N c.n ~ c.n c.n (') en 0 ~ 00 "c.n 0 0 ~ c.n 0 0 UI ex> .j>. C1> P N .... 00 i::> "" ~ N ex> N C1> 0 c: ::] ;:;: (') 0 UI "" "" "" c.n ~ .... :".. :".. :".. W w co co co c.n c.n --I 0 ~ ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .j>. c.n ~ ex> C1> (') ....., 00 00 ....., c.n 0 ~ .j>. ~ .j>. N UI 0 co t" C1> :-J .... W '" c.n :".. 0 C1> co ex> 0 0 c: ::] ;:; (') 0 UI "" :-J co c.n c.n .... i::> 0 i::> i::> i::> 0 0 0 0 0 --I ~ ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w c.n N "" C1> (') ....., ~ ~ "c.n ~ 0 .j>. C1> "" N 0 UI ex> "" ex> c:> 0 .... i::> i::> 0 0 i::> 0 0 0 0 0 (') o ?! , (J) > z c (J) > ::0 ~ o ~ ~ , , m -< (') ::0 m (J) --I ;n '" c. 0' ;n o '" c. s: en -l c "lJ::j a lD _.~ '" 0 U&, "lJ.... ".~ '" 0> ~ "lJ -)> =;n r-l ~ lD c. en " '" '0 S' ce (J) --I m < m z (J) Qo ~ -< --I o Z , , .0' !!l- 0' => )> o o m z o c s: .. ~ 161Il10: o o - ~ ... c: ~ ;:;: C') W ./>. ~ W N N N 0 ..." 0 tn tn 0 tn tn tn N ~ 1/1 ?' 0 0 0 0 <::> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tn ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N tn 0 0 -I 0 <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II !: ...." Cll <II <II <II <II <II ~ .N Cll ~ ~ <II .Cll tn -:".. <II W Cll tn N tn b ~ b W 0, w ~ C') 0 0 tn 0 0 0 tn 0 ..." W ..." tn W 0 tn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <::> w N ex> W ..." 0 0 1/1 ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i:.n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c: ~ ;:;: C') N W ~ w t w ex> 0 co ~ Cll N tn ..." ~ ~ ~ 1/1 '" 0 ./>. Cll W ex> ~ '" <::> <::> <::> 0 <::> ..." ~ ... tn W i:.n N Co :"., co ex> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 :.... 0 tn 0 Cll tn N co N 0 0 0 Cll Cll N ex> -I 0 <II <II <II <II <II (A !: tn ./>. <II <II <II <II ~ (A ~ .W <II (A <II ./>. C') ex. to <II N ..." ex> w 0> tn b 0 co co N 0, 0 ..." Cll Cll tn 0 co ..." N W Cll W ex> ex> tn ex> 1/1 0 tn ./>. N :-J Cll ~ ..." Cll Cll co ./>. ./>. ?' w ... 0 en i:.n i:.n ..." Co <0 en i:.n 0 0 0 0 W Co 0 0 0 N 0 ./>. co ./>. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c: ~ ;:;: ~ C') Cll Cll ~ N co N ex> 0 ~ W co W 0 W Cll ./>. 1/1 ", ex> ./>. <::> tn tn ~ ~ 0 <::> 0 0 0 W N ... w '-.l ~ tn :"., N N 0 ~ ~ ~ W W N 0 N co Cll ./>. ./>. tn ex> 0 co co co ~ ~ ~ tn -I 0 <II <II ~ ~ ~ <II <II <II <II (A (A <II N 0 <II <II ~ (A W ~ N .tn ~ ~ <II C') W N f N ./>. ex. N 0> 0 b ..." to to (A ex> 0 N N Cll ~ ..." Cll ex> ~ N ..." 0 0 ./>. ./>. 1/1 Cll 0 ~ 0 0 ~ N co tn ",. Cll Cll ex> 0 ... :"., en ~ 0 Co i:.n N 0 W :"., ~ i:.n i:.n ~ i:.n 0 ./>. Cll ex> ex> 0 ex> 0 tn 0 0 0 0 tn 0 c: ~ ;:;: C') ./>. ./>. ~ W ./>. ~ ..." 0 tn tn Cll N N N ex> 0 N 1/1 0 0 tn tn tn 0 tn 0 <::> <::> 0 0 0 ./>. 0 ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tn 0 tn 0 0 0 0 -I 0 <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II AI' .CO ..." <II <II <II <II ~ <II ~ ../>. ~ ~ ex> N -:".. b N N N C') 0 <II N Cll ex> ~ ex> tn <II 0 0 0 Cll tn tn ./>. ex> 0 0 Cll tn W W Cll 0 1/1 <::> 0 ?' 0 0 0 tn 0 ",. Cll ex> 0 0 <::> 0 ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..." 0 i:.n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tn 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIl -I m < m z CIl po > =i o z C') o $! r CIl )> Z C CIl )> ;:c ~ o ~ ~ r r m -< C') ;:c m CIl -I ;0 III C. 0' ;0 o III C. s:: (f) -i c "O=i a lD CD" ~ s:l" "O~ :::r~ III '" :\l "0 -)> =;0 r-i ~ lD c. "' n III 'C S' co ~ ~ <ii' !!l. 0' ::> )> o o m z o c s:: .. ~ 16' 1 A [ 0'" ~ ~ Q. ~ .... C ::l C ;:;: ::l 0'1 () N N ~ N N ~ N N ~ ;:;: 0 0 ~ N N --l --l 0'1 --l 0 0 0'1 () 0 N W .j>. 0'1 0> III 0 !" 0> ~ 0'1 0'1 0'1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'1 .... 0 --l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 it> -i -i 0 N 0 ~ [ ... ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N .j>. 0'1 0> .j>. ~ N W N W () :.. 0'1 ~ 0> --l 0> w () c.n N a, "-J 0 W a, --l N N 0, ~ 0 ... 0 ~ a, N ~ W 0 co 0> <0 N --l 0 --l 0'1 ~ 0 0 0'1 III CXl 0 .j>. <0 0 0'1 ~ III 0 0> ~ 0'1 0'1 0 0'1 0 0 0 0 c:> .... b 0 0 0 0 0 0'1 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ::l C ;:;: ::l () N N ~ W ~ N ~ ~ ~ ;:;: w 0 ~ 0'1 0'1 0'1 0 .j>. 0 0> 0> N () <0 0> .j>. 0> 0> III W N 0'1 co <0 f" <0 0'1 0 w f" 0> 5l <0 0> ~ ~ !J> 0> .... W 0, co 0, 0'1 ~ Ol 'l Ol ~ ~ w w w Ol '" ~ ~ ~ .j>. 0 co co --l .j>. <0 --l 0'1 0'1 .... 0 w w w co <0 it> -i -i 0 N [ ~ [ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II> ~ ~ ~ ~ W N N 0'1 --l 0'1 0'1 t N N N N () N ~ ~ W --l co W () ~ 0 a, ~ w c.n N a, a, N <0 0 ... w .j>. "-J (0 c.n w 0 w co 0 0'1 <0 ~ 0> W 0 ~ co 0 III N <0 0'1 co "'" W --l III W !" "'" ~ ~ .j>. W 0> co c:> ~ en .... t <0 ~ co f" co 0'1 .... Co co N ~ 0, ~ 0, Co Co --l ~ 0 w OJ 0 <0 0, Ol co 0> 0 co 0> N 00 N --l N 0 0'1 0 <0 0 ~ <0 C ::l C ;:;: ::l () N W ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ;:;: 0'1 0 ~ co 0> 0> co 00 "'" 0> 0> co () W ~ ~ N 0'1 0'1 III 0> --l --l <0 W 0 <0 --l !J> 0 0 --l 0 0'1 !" c:> <0 c:> --l .... 0 ~ ~ Ol 0, 0, Ol N ~ 0, 0, N III 0 co --l Co N '" 0'1 co <0 0 0 0 0 0'1 0 0 0 0'1 .... 0 .j>. 0 0> <0 00 it> -i -i 0 '" 0 ~ s- UI ~ [ ~ <fl ~ ~ N <fl ~ <fl <fl <fl <fl II> <fl ~ <fl ~ ."'" 0> W .0> .j>. 0'1 0'1 ~ W N N .j>. () -:.... ~ <fl .!'J N 0> N () ~ ~ W N W "-J 0 0'1 ~ 0'1 N w 0 CXl 0'1 <0 W 0, ~ Co 0 .j>. --l 0> co --l --l <0 0> co 0> "'" 0 III 0 W N co 00 00 "'" III 0 ~ w ~ "'" co w ~ ~ 00 :-J 0> .... b 0'1 "'" 0> N --l 0> .... Co --l 0 Ol Ol 0 N --l W 0 0 --l 0 ~ ~ co ~ '" 0 0> ~ 0 0 0 0 0'1 0 0 0 0'1 CXl 0 co 0 0 ~ co C ::l ;:;: 0'1 () W W ~ 0'1 ~ W N N ~ 0 0 ~ N N 0'1 0 --l 0 --l --l 0'1 0 W "'" 0> 0> III co .j>. --l 0 c:> 0 0 0'1 0 ~ 0'1 0 0 --l 0'1 !" ~ 0'1 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -i -i 0 0 ~ [ <fl [ ~ <fl <fl <fl N <fl ~ <fl <fl <fl <fl <fl <fl ~ ~ ~ "'" w W .0> ~ 0'1 00 ~ w "'" w w () 0'1 <fl .--l 00 .00 w () a, N ~ --l ~ ~ c.n 0'1 Co ~ 0, ~ 0 0 0'1 co 0 w W 0 .j>. <0 "'" N .j>. 0 0 N 0 0 g: 0'1 III 0 ~ 0 0> 00 ~ III "'" 0> W c:> 0 0 0 0'1 0 0 0 .... 0 ~ 0 ~ 0'1 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en -i m < m z en I/O ~ :l o z () o ~ r- en )> z o en )> ;0 ;0 ~ o ~ ~ r- r- m -< () ;0 m en -i ;0 '" c. 0' ;0 o '" c. s: (J) -i c -o=i ~ OJ .2. '" ~ u'? -0'" =r~ ~ '" '" -0 -:t> =;0 r-i !!l OJ c. (J> o '" '0 5' co '1 <5' !!'. 0' => :t> o o m Z o c s: .. ~ 16. 1 AlO" ~ '" a ~ ... c :;J ;:;: (") 0 '" w !" a> w w 0> 00 00 ... 0 01 8 0, 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ -t co ~ ~ --J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... a 01 01 ~ I\.) "" co "" "" (") --J 00 a ~ N N a w a 0 ~ co --J 01 ~ --J 0 I\.) --J '" ~ I\.) 0> I\.) 0 0 0 I\.) ... 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ::J ;:;: (") 0 '" I\.) !" ;I>- "" "" "" --J --J ... 00 ~ 01 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 w I\.) 01 co co co 0> 01 ~ "ii ~ ~ &r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... .01 ."" ~ 01 01 0> W W (") ~ a N ~ 00 0, W 01 --J ~ 0 co 01 --J 0 W W W ~ 00 '" '" 00 ~ ~ I\.) W 01 I\.) 00 ... ~ --J ~ ~ 00 0 :r.- :r.- co I\.) I\.) 0 0> 0 0 0 01 C ::J ;:;: (") 0 '" "" --J --J 01 01 co co co ... ~ :r.- :r.- w w '" '" '" 00 co co 01 01 W W W ~ -t ~ 0 w ~ ~ !: w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (0 00 01 ~ 00 0> "" 01 "" (") ~ ~ 00 00 "-.J 0, ~ N (0 0 0 "" ~ "" I\.) "" 0 0 '" W 01 co I\.) 0> --J C}I 0 ~ ... Co en 0, :r.- 0 0 ~ en w I\.) co 00 0 0 0 0 --J C ::J ;:;: (") 0 '" --J --J co 01 01 co co co ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ "ii w .... ~ ~ !: --J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N .w 01 1" --J 0> .w "" "" (") I\.) --J ~ ~ 0, ~ 01 00 0, 0 I\.) "" 0> --J I\.) 0 0 0> 00 '" 0 00 --J 00 9 0 0 9 ~ ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (") o ~ .. en )> z c en )> ;0 ~ o ~ ~ .. .. m -< (") ;0 m en -t ;0 " 0. 0' ;0 o " 0. ;:: (/) -i C -u=i a OJ cD" ~ 0., -u~ :::r~ 1)1'" '" -u -:!> =;0 r--i ~OJ 0. "' n " 'C S' '" :r cO' !!l- 0.' => en -t m < m z en I/O S -t o Z :!> o o m z o c ;:: .. ~ 16' 1 A 1 0'" ~ ... o ~ ~ ... c:: ;:] ;:;: C') 0 tII ... .... 0 !: C') 0 tII ... c:: ;:] ;:;: C') 0 tII ... ci !: C') 0 tII ... c:: ;:] ;:;: C') 0 tII ... .... 0 !: C') 0 tII ... c:: ;:] ;:;: C') 0 tII ... .... 0 !: C') 0 tII ... en .... m < m z en QO r )> -< .... o z C') o ~ r en )> z o en )> ;0 ~ o ~ ~ r r m -< C') ;0 m en .... ;u '" c. o' ;u o '" c. s: en -i c -,,=1 am -.~ '" 0 SJ" -,,'" =r~ ~ '" '" -" -)> =;u r-i !!lm c. en " '" '0 5' '" :j' cO' !!l. o' ::J )> o o m z o c s: .. ~ 1'1 lebE~, 201~ [)P/~ 'Yrl r -J~fY" Fiala RECEIVED MINUTES OF THE HEARING OF THE Halas, FEB 232010 COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRAT~~~r~ng Coletta Board of County comml6Siooers Naples, Florida, February 5, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Special Magistrate, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in the Administration Building "F," 3rd floor, Collier County Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following persons present: SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: Honorable Brenda Garretson ALSO PRESENT: Jennifer Waldron, Code Enforcement Supervisor Michele McGonagle, Administrative Secretary Mile. eon.: Dale: 0; ?-3 10 lG I.(J .B-1 , I ~' "1 1 Fetruary sHofo . .. I. CALL TO ORDER The Hearing was called to order at 9:00 AM by the Honorable Special Magistrate Brenda Garretson. All those testifying at the proceeding did so under oath. A. Hearing Rules and Regulations were given by Special Magistrate Garretson. The Special Magistrate noted that, prior to conducting the Hearing, the Respondents were given an opportunity to speak with their Investigating Officer(s) for a Resolution by Stipulation; the goal is to obtain compliance without being punitive. RECESS: 9:15 AM RECONVENED: 9:30 AM II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Jennifer Waldron, Code Enforcement Supervisor, noted the following changes: (a) Under Item V (B), "Hearings," the following cases were WITHDRAWN by the County: . Agenda #1, Case #SO 172140 - CEEX 20100000102 - BCC vs. Sondra Schubiner . Agenda #3, Case #SO 166111 - CEEX 20090019344 - BCC vs. Mae Porter . Agenda #5, Case #SO 167671 - CEEX 20090019561 - BCC vs. Gail Turner . Agenda #7, Case #DAS 12085 - CEEX 20100000141 - BCC vs. Francine Judith Parkes . Agenda #8, Case #DAS 12086 - CEEX 20100000142 - BCC vs. Francine Judith Parkes . Agenda #9, Case #DAS 12087 - CEEX 21010000143 - BCC vs. Francine Judith Parkes . Agenda #10, Case #DAS 12088 - CEEX 20100000144 - BCC vs. Francine Judith Parkes . Agenda #12, Case #CENA 20090015742 - BCC vs. Jose & Oscar Tellez . Agenda #13, Case #CESD 20090010105 - BCC vs. David & Pansy Dempsey . Agenda #14, Case #CESD 20090010614 - BCC vs. Benito Barnhart . Agenda #15, Case #CESD 20090010185 - BCC vs. Lorenzo Martinez . Agenda #16, Case #CEV 20090019152 - BCC vs. Leo & Linda Armstrong . Agenda #18, Case #CEPM 20090012058 - BCC vs. South Bay Association, LLC clo Robert Wolforth . Agenda #19, Case #CEPM 20090012479 - BCC vs. Kenneth Moss, Sr. and Tommie Moss (b) Under Item VI (A), "Motion for Imposition of Fines," the following case was WITHDRAWN by the County: . Agenda #2, Case #CEPM 20090008288 - BCC vs. Michael De Witt The Special Magistrate approved the Agenda as amended, subject to changes made 2 ,. l' r F!ruar~, t10 during the course of the Hearing at the discretion of the Special Magistrate. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - January 15,2010 The Minutes of the Special Magistrate Hearing held on January 15, 2010 were reviewed by the Special Magistrate and approved as submitted. IV. MOTIONS A. Motion for Reduction/Abatement of Fines: None V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Stipulations: None B. Hearings: 2. Case #SO 172406 - CEEX 20100000519 - BCC vs. Vilma Hal!:ue The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present. Collier County Sheriffs Office Deputy Kenneth Robins was not present. Violations: Code of Law & Ordinances, Section 130-67 Expired permit 08-19-09, Handicapped space Violation address: Waterside Shops, across from Silver Spoon The Respondent resides at 5875 Cobblestone Lane, D-205, Naples, Florida 34112, The Respondent requested dismissal of the violation due to the absence of the Officer. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the Respondent's Motion and DISMISSED the violation. 4. Case #SO 165310 - CEEX 20100000581- BCC vs. Anasticia Cambo The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present. Collier County Sheriffs Office Deputy Stephan Leoni was not present. Violations: Code of Law & Ordinances, Section 130-66 County right of way Violation address: Golden Gate Parkway & 52nd Terrace SW The Respondent resides at 7525 Stoneybrook Drive, Unit 937, Naples, Florida. The Respondent requested dismissal of the violation due to the absence of the Officer.. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the Respondent's Motion and DISMISSED the violation. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Motion for Imposition of Fines: 3 1 ~JruJ, 5, 291 - 1. Case #CESD 20090005170 - BCC vs. Jav Dee Staton The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan Musse who was present. The Respondent was also present. Violations: Collier County Land Development Code 2004-41, as amended, Section(s) 10.02.06(B)(l)(A), 1O.02.06(B)(I)(E), and I 0.02.06(B)(1 )(E)(I) Permit # 200 I 051852 for a "convenience permit - shingle re-roof" that was issued on 5-21-01 and expired on 11-17-01. Certificate of Completion has not been obtained Folio No: 73830920002 Violation address: 1134 Milano Drive, Naples The Respondent resides at 1134 Milano Drive, Naples, Florida. Investigator Musse stated the violation was abated and the previously assessed Operational Costs of $112.42 were paid, The County requested to impose fines in the total amount of $200,00 for the period from January 5, 2010 through January 6, 2010 (2 days at $100/day). The Respondent stated he was unaware the Contractor had not applied for the Certificate of Completion. Due to the Contractor's negligence, the Respondent paid an additional $1,300 to obtain an after-the-fact permit. He requested dismissal of the fines, The Special Magistrate DENIED the County's Motionfor Imposition of Fines. 3. Case #CEPM 20080008180 - BCC vs. Graciela Susi The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Ron Martindale. The Respondent was also present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws & Ord, Chapter 22 Buildings and Building Regulations, Article II, Florida Building Code, Section 22-26(103.11.2) No protective barrier surrounding swimming pool. Folio No: 49660105665 Violation address: 2130 Morning Sun Lane The Respondent resides at 2130 Morning Sun Lane, Naples, Florida. Investigator Martindale stated Part "B" of the Order issued on October 2, 2009, installation of a temporary barrier, was abated on November 5, 2009, but Part "C," installation of a permanent barrier, has not been abated, 4 1 &Ju~5,281 - The County requested to impose fines in the amount of $5,400 for the period from October 10,2009 through November 5, 2009 (27 days @ $200/days) for Part "B," and fines in the amount of$13,000 for the period from December 3, 2009 through February 5, 2010 (65 days @ $200/day), together with the previously assessed Operational Costs of$117.70, for a total amount of $18,517.70. The Respondent stated she inadvertently missed the initial Hearing, was confused concerning what constituted a "temporary barrier" and received incorrect information from Home Depot. She did install the correct temporary barrier by the deadline but did not notify Code Enforcement to conduct an inspection. She is unemployed and unable to afford to install a permanent barrier. The house is in foreclosure because a short-sale fell through. She requested dismissal of the fines since she complied with the Order to the extent that she was able. The Investigator noted the exposed pool is a Health, Safety and Welfare issue and the Respondent has not applied for a permit to install a permanent barrier. Supervisor Waldron stated if a lien for fines is filed against a property, a Bank will abate the violations and the County will enter into a Settlement Agreement with the Banle The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for Imposition of Fines but reduced the total amount due to $13,000 plus payment of the Operational Costs of $117.70 and notedfines will continue to accrue. 5. Case #CEROW 20090003650 - BCC vs. Elmar Robert Aponte & Svlvia Lopez The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Renald Paul. Respondent, Elmar Robert Aponte, was present. Respondent, Sylvia Lopez, was represented by her daughter, Jessica Aguirre. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 110, Article II, Division 1, Section 110.31(A) Right of way was altered with no permits Folio No: 36430480002 Violation address: 2921 53rd Street SW, Naples The Respondents are divorced and Ms. Aguirre stated she had permission to represent her mother. Investigator Paul stated the violation has been abated and the previously assessed Operational Costs of$117.78 have been paid, The County requested to impose fines in the total amount of $4,400 for the period from October 22, 2009 through November 12,2009 (22 days @ $200/day), Ms. Aguirre stated she was involved in an accident while pregnant and her father cared for her and her two-year old son. They forgot to call Code Enforcement after 5 1~ 11 81 February 5, 20 10 ".,'~ the work was completed due to the emergency situation and the birth of her son in October. She requested dismissal of the fines, The Investigator stated the County would not object to dismissal of fines. The Special Magistrate noted there was compliance. The Special Magistrate DENIED the County's Motion for Imposition of Fines due to mitigating circumstances. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. Hearings: 6. Case #PU 4508 - CEEX 20100000153 - BCC vs. Ramiro & Martha Llerena The Hearing was requested by Collier County Public Utilities Investigator Tanya Phillips who was represented by Senior Investigator Ray Addison. The Respondents were not present. Violations: Ordinance 2005-54, Section 19E(2, 3, and 4) No commercial solid waste collection service, Customer previously issued Notice of Violation Citation numbers 4506 & 4507. Customer still in violation. Health, Safety, Welfare issue. Folio No: 62250520006 Violation address: 11375 Tamiami Trail East The Notice of Hearing was sent via Certified Mail on January 25, 2010 and notice was left at the above address on January 27, 2010. Investigator Addison stated Citations were issued on December 30, 2009 and December 31,2009, The restaurant is no longer in business and the building is vacant. The violation has not been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to pay fines in the amount of $200 and an administrative fee of $5. 00 on or before March 5, 2010. The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $50.00 on or before March5, 2010. Total Amount Due: $255.00 RECESS: 10:34 AM RECONVENED: 10:52 AM 6 llbLJ5,29J '. 11. Case #CEPM 20090017256 - BCC vs. U1ises Puentes, Platinum Home Investment Corn. The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Ralph Bosa who was present. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Ord. 2004-58, Sec, 12; Hazardous & dangerous building Folio No: 40352480008 Violation address: 3231 18th Avenue NE, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on January 22, 2010. Investigator Bosa stated the Collier County Building Department declared the house was dangerous on November 16,2009, He introduced two photographs of the fire- damaged structure which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to apply for and obtain either a Collier County Building Permit to repair the damage, or a Demolition Permit to remove the structure, all required inspections and a Certificate of Completion on or before February 12, 2010, or afine of $250. 00 per day will be imposedfor each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. Ifthe Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by Contractor bid-out and assess the costs to the Respondent. Ifnecessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriff's Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of this case in the amount of $112.62 on or before March 5,2010. The Respondent is to notify the Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. Total Amount Due: $112.62 ** Supervisor Waldron stated the County WITHDREW Agenda #17, Case #CEPM 20090019294 - BCC vs. Senen Lugo. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Motion for Imposition of Fines: 4. Case # CEAU 20090011940 - BCC vs. Kenneth & Pennv Ann Price The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Renald Paul. 7 1" 1 ai February 5, 2010 The Respondents were not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws & Ord, Chapter 22 Buildings and Building Regulations, Article II, Florida Building Code, Section 22-26(103,11.2) No fence or pool enclosure around the pool Folio No: 38223400006 Violation address: 6111 Cedar Tree Lane, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on January 25, 2010, Investigator Paul stated the previously assessed Operational Costs of$117,78 have been paid but the violation has not been abated. The County requested to impose fines in the total amount of $6,200 for the period from December 6,2009 through February 5, 2010 (62 days @ $lOO/day). The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for Imposition of Fines in the total amount of $6,200 and noted fines will continue to accrue. C. Emergency Cases: None VII. OLD BUSINESS: A. Motion to Amend Previously Issued Order I. Case #2007080702 - BCC vs. Jill J. Weaver and Henry Tesno The Hearing was requested by Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joseph Mucha who was present. The Respondents were not present. Violations: Collier County Ordinance 2004-58, Section 6, Subsection I and 2, the Property Maintenance Ordinance Numerous internal and external Minimum Housing Violations resulting from the shut off of water to the mobile home, as described in the Property Maintenance Inspection Report. Folio No: 53352720001 Violation address: 3069 Lunar Street The County requested to amend a previously issued Order to include additional options, i.e., to either restore water service to the mobile home, or vacate the occupants from the premises until the water service has been restored. Investigator Mucha stated the Respondents sold the mobile home to a new owner but the property is still being fined $500 per day. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Oral Motion. 8 l' I FJruaryelo ...-, VIII. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Request to Forward Cases to County Attorney's Office as referenced in the submitted Executive Summary. The Special Magistrate reviewed the cases cited in the Executive Summary and GRANTED the County's Request. B. Request for Special Magistrate to Impose Nuisance Abatement Liens on Cases referenced in the submitted Executive Summary. The Special Magistrate reviewed the cases cited in the Executive Summary and GRANTED the County's Request. IX. REPORTS: None X. NEXT HEARING DATE - February 19, 2010, at 9:00 AM, located at the Collier County Government Center, Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. There being no further business for the good of the County, the Hearing was adjourned by Order of the Special Magistrate at 11:10 AM. COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING nda Garretson, Special Magistrate The Minutesie approved by the Special Magistrate on as presented , or as amended , .-/ \'2.~ ~ 'dolo \ I 9