HEX Agenda 11/08/2018
AGENDA
THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2018 IN CONFERENCE
ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING & REGULATION
BUILDING, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA
INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY
THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC
MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL
SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED
DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE
RECORD.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL
NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY
NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH
RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE
BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT,
PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING
EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A
COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME,
ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS
WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL
ADDRESS.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. REVIEW OF AGENDA
3. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. PETITION NO. VA-PL20180001716– Southpointe at Windstar Marina Association, Inc. and
Windstar on Naples Bay Master Association, Inc. request a variance from Section 5.03.02 of the
Land Development Code, which limits fences and walls within a residential component of a PUD
to a maximum height of 6 feet, to instead allow a maximum height of 8 feet, for a proposed 8 foot
wall that will replace an existing 6 foot fence located on the south side of Gulfstar Drive South, on
the west side of Hamilton Avenue, in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier
County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner]
NOTE: This matter will not be heard at the November 8, 2018 HEX Meeting and will be re -
advertised at a later date to be heard by the Collier County Planning Commission.
B. PETITION NO. BDE-PL20180001018– Mitchel and Karyn Cooper request a 235-foot boat
dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development
Code, for a total protrusion of 255 feet, to accommodate a new docking facility with one boat slip
for the benefit of property located at 37 Pelican Street W., on the north side of Pelican Street W.,
approximately 1000 feet west of Capri Blvd., in Section 31, Township 51 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Gilbert Martinez, Principal Planner]
NOTE: This matter will not be heard at the November 8, 2018 HEX Meeting and will be re -
advertised at a later date to be heard by the Collier County Planning Commission.
C. PETITION NO. VA-PL20180001748– Mitchel and Karyn Cooper request a variance from
Section 5.03.06 E. of the Land Development Code to reduce the minimum side yard setback for a
boat dock facility from 7.5 feet to 1.3 feet on the north side of the proposed boat dock, and f rom
7.5 feet to 2.1 feet on the south side of the proposed boat dock, for property located at 37 Pelican
Street, on the north side of Pelican Street, approximately 1000 feet west of Capri Blvd., in Section
31, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 0.18± acres.
[Coordinator: Gilbert Martinez, Principal Planner]
D. PETITION NO. BDE-PL20160001029– Steven Bergeson and Cynthia Mueller request a 27-
foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land
Development Code, for a total protrusion of 47 feet, to accommodate a new docking facility with
one boat slip for the benefit of Lot 5, Block 7 of the Gulf Shores subdivision, also described as
3254 Lakeview Drive, located on the west side of Lakeview Drive, approximately 1,000 feet west
of Bayshore Drive, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
[Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner]
4. OTHER BUSINESS
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS
6. ADJOURN
HEARING PACKAGE
BDE - PL20160001029
BERGESON/MUELLER
3254 LAKEVIEW DR.
NAPLES, FL
PREPARED BY:
TURRELL HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC
3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE
NAPLES, FL 34104
APPLICATION
& ADDRESSING CHECKLIST
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724
ADDRESSING CHECKLIST
Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division
at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by
Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing.
Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE
PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section.
PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type)
BL (Blasting Permit)
BD (Boat Dock Extension)
Carnival/Circus Permit
CU (Conditional Use)
EXP (Excavation Permit)
FP (Final Plat
LLA (Lot Line Adjustment)
PNC (Project Name Change)
PPL (Plans & Plat Review)
PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat)
PUD Rezone
RZ (Standard Rezone)
SDP (Site Development Plan)
SDPA (SDP Amendment)
SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP)
SIP (Site Im provement Plan)
SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP)
SNR (Street Name Change)
SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted)
TDR (Transfer of Development Rights)
VA (Variance)
VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit)
VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit)
OTHER
LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached)
FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one)
STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned)
PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable)
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 1
LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right-
of-way
PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable)
SDP - or AR or PL #
SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties)
CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable)
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724
Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up
Applicant Name:
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name
approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Approved by: Date:
Updated by: Date:
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2
Fax
Email/Fax:Phone:
Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application;
indicate whether proposed or existing)
NARRATIVE OF REQUEST
(PRIMARY & SECONDARY CRITERIA)
PRIMARY CRITERIA
The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in
determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing
Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a
particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the
request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the
6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response
to the listed criteria and/or questions.
1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in
relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property;
consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the
primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate;
typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be
one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be
appropriate.)
Response: The total length of shoreline for this property is 48ft. The zoning and upland land use is
single-family residential which warrants no more than 2 slips per the CC-LDC. The current
proposed dock design is a 5-foot wide finger-dock which has 1 optional boat slip and is consistent
with other docks on the same waterway.
2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general
length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner’s application is unable to launch or moor
at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner’s application and survey should show that the water
depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an
extension.)
Response: See attached survey/exhibits illustrating the existing water depths on-site. At the 20-foot
protrusion line measured from the top of the rip-rap line there is only about 2-feet of water at low
tide. Therefore there is insufficient water depths to moor a vessel or provide safe access to the
proposed docking facility within the 20-foot protrusion line.
3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within
an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any
marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.)
Response: The proposed docking facility will not have any adverse impacts to navigation within the
waterway. The proposed dock will only protrude 40-feet from the MHWL into a waterway that is
approximately 375-feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. The entire waterway can be used for
navigation as there are no navigational markers indicating the exact thread of navigation.
4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of
the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock
facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should
maintain the required percentages.)
Response: The proposed docking facility protrudes approximately 40-feet from the MHWL into a
waterway that is 375-feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. The proposed dock protrudes
approximately 11% into the waterway and therefore the proposed dock meets this criteria.
5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility
would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the
use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
Response: The proposed docking facility will provide 10-foot setbacks from the north
property/riparian line and 7.5-foot setbacks from the south property/riparian line. However, the
existing neighboring dock to the south would be directly impacted by the proposed docking facility.
The reason the proposed dock would interfere with the neighboring dock/slip is due to the layout of
the neighboring dock being parallel to the shoreline and the dock extends into the side yard
setback. This dock was permitted back in 1999 and then constructed in the early 2000’s however
based on our research this dock never received its final CO from the county and is also encroaching
into the north side yard setback. The CCPC Resolution (99-40) does not have the approved dock
exhibits attached but THA did find the original application within the county recorders and based
on the approved dock design the existing dock does not match what was originally approved. Also
the dock was approved to have a 35-foot protrusion from the most restrictive point which should
have been from the plotted property line. However, based on the existing dock dimensions the dock
is currently 35-feet from the MHWL which is not the most restrictive point.
With all this research and collected information the applicant Steve Bergeson and Cynthia Mueller
have riparian rights to the waterway and have worked with THA to design a dock to be consistent
with others on the same waterway. There was no design option that would not have impacted the
ingress/egress of the neighboring dock to the south.
SECONDARY CRITERIA
1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject
property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock
facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include
type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.)
Response: The proposed docking facility design was primarily governed by the County guidelines
and the existing subject property shoreline conditions. The subject property shoreline consist of
mangrove growth which the proposed dock had to extend waterward of in order to clear the
mangroves and to reach adequate water depths. Additionally the most restrictive point is the
location of the top of rip-rap being located on the landward side of the mangroves.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for
loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly
related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.)
Response: The proposed docking facility has been minimized in order to meet the county dock
building guidelines as well as to be within the required side yard setbacks. The proposed dock
design still provides adequate and safe access to and from the vessel without any excessive decking
being proposed.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property’s linear
waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.)
Response: The proposed dock facility has been designed to only moor one vessel up to 25-feet which
is more than 50% the subject property’s linear waterfront footage. Therefore this criteria is not
met.
4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of
neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the
view of either property owner.)
Response: The subject property is one of the few remaining lots on this section of the surrounding
waterway without a docking facility. The proposed dock has been designed within the required
side yard setbacks and the overall design is consistent with all of the existing docks on the same
waterway.
5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If
seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 I must be demonstrated.)
Response: There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties
within 200’ of the existing dock structure.
6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of
LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be
demonstrated.)
Response: The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee
Protection Requirements.
PROPERTY INFORMATION
(QUIT CLAIM DEED & SURVEY)
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM
AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION
• CYNTHIA MUELLER
• STEVEN BERGESON
DRAWINGS
STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE: N 26° 07' 24.235"<> LONGITUDE: W 81° 46' 26.334"SITE ADDRESS:<> 3254 LAKEVIEW DRNAPLES, FL 34112Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg LOCATION 8/15/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ04-05-181614RMJ1425BERGESON DOCKLOCATION MAP50RMJIJT--07-02-1807-05-1808-14-18--JRJRJR--PAGES 2-6,8,9PAGES 2-9PAGES 1-9--01 OF 09COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTY)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY
-2.6-2.6-2.6-2.8-2.6-2.9-3.1-2.9-2.6-2.4-2.2-1.9-1.7-1.70.0-1.1-1.80.00.22.44.64.6-0.2-0.9-1.0-2.0-2.3-2.0-2.0-2.0-2.1-2.5-2.0-2.1-3.1-2.0-0.6-1.00.00.24.75.03.15.04.25.05.03.52.74.04.23.14.7-0.10.00.40.8-0.8-1.4-1.1-1.7-0.8-1.1NESW0 102040SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,3254 LAKEVIEW DRNAPLES FL 34112Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg EX AERIAL 8/15/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ04-05-181614RMJ1425BERGESON DOCKEXISTING AERIAL50RMJIJT--07-02-1807-05-1808-15-18--JRJRJR--REV. PROPERTY LINEREV. PROPERTY LINEREV. TEXT--02 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MLW (NAVD)=··MHW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY"04-10-18-1.8'+0.2'48'0375'DILAPIDATED METALAND WOOD PILES TOBE REMOVEDMHW =0.2' NAVDMLW =-1.8' NAVDTOE OFRIP-RAPPROPERTYBOUNDARYEXISTING RAMPTO BE REMOVEDRIPARIANLINETOP OFRIP-RAP
-2.6-2.6-2.6-2.8-2.6-2.9-3.1-2.9-2.6-2.4-2.2-1.9-1.7-1.70.0-1.1-1.80.00.22.44.64.6-0.2-0.9-1.0-2.0-2.3-2.0-2.0-2.0-2.1-2.5-2.0-2.1-3.1-2.0-0.6-1.00.00.24.75.03.15.04.25.05.03.52.74.04.23.14.7-0.10.00.40.8-0.8-1.4-1.1-1.7-0.8-1.1NESW0 5 1020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg EX LINE 8/15/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ04-05-181614RMJ1425BERGESON DOCKEXISTING SITE50RMJIJT--07-02-1807-05-1808-15-18--JRJRJR--REV. PROPERTY LINEREV. PROPERTY LINEREV. TEXT--03 OF 09MHW =0.2' NAVDMLW =-1.8' NAVDTOE OFRIP-RAPEXISTINGRAMP TO BEREMOVEDRIPARIANLINERIPARIANLINEADJACENTDOCKADJACENTDOCKDILAPIDATED METALAND WOOD PILES TOBE REMOVED·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MLW (NAVD)=··MHW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY"04-10-18-1.8'+0.2'48'0375'PROPERTYBOUNDARYTOP OFRIP-RAP
NESW0 153060SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,3254 LAKEVIEW DRNAPLES FL 34112Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg LOT DIMENSION 8/15/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ04-05-181614RMJ1425BERGESON DOCKLOT DIMENSION50RMJIJT--07-02-1807-05-1808-15-18--JRJRJR--REV. PROPERTY LINEREV. PROPERTY LINEREV. TEXT--04 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MLW (NAVD)=··MHW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY"04-10-18-1.8'+0.2'48'0375'162'154'70'PROPERTYBOUNDARY37'LAKEVIEW DR
p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg 8/15/2018NESW0 5 1020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg PRO AERIAL 8/15/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ04-05-181614RMJ1425BERGESON DOCKPROPOSED DOCK WITH DIMENSIONS50RMJIJT--07-02-1807-05-1808-15-18--JRJRJR--REV. PROPERTY LINEREV. PROPERTY LINEREV. TEXT--05 OF 095'40'7.6'12'12'26'MHW =0.2' NAVDMLW =-1.8' NAVDTOE OFRIP-RAP10.6'EXISTINGRAMP TO BEREMOVEDPROPOSEDDOCKPROPOSEDBOAT LIFTADJACENTDOCKADJACENTDOCKOPTIONALHAND RAIL47'PROPERTYBOUNDARYRIPARIANLINERIPARIANLINE25'·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MLW (NAVD)=··MHW (NAVD)=NOTES:· · · · TOP OFRIP-RAPPROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):"COURT GREGORY"04-10-18-1.8'+0.2'48'0375'192'192'47'TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM TOP OF RIP-RAP:40'TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM TOP OF MHWL:
-2.6-2.6-2.6-2.8-2.6-2.9-3.1-2.9-2.6-2.4-2.2-1.9-1.7-1.70.0-1.1-1.80.00.22.44.64.6-0.2-0.9-1.0-2.0-2.3-2.0-2.0-2.0-2.1-2.5-2.0-2.1-3.1-2.0-0.6-1.00.00.24.75.03.15.04.25.05.03.52.74.04.23.14.7-0.10.00.40.8-0.8-1.4-1.1-1.7-0.8-1.1p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg 8/15/2018NESW0 5 1020SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg PRO LINE 8/15/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ04-05-181614RMJ1425BERGESON DOCKPROPOSED DOCK WITH DEPTHS50RMJIJT--07-02-1807-05-1808-15-18--JRJRJR--REV. PROPERTY LINEREV. PROPERTY LINEREV. TEXT--06 OF 09MHW =0.2' NAVDMLW =-1.8' NAVDTOP OFRIP-RAPEXISTINGRAMP TO BEREMOVEDPROPOSEDDOCKPROPOSEDBOAT LIFTADJACENTDOCKADJACENTDOCKOPTIONALHAND RAILPROPERTYBOUNDARY25'TOE OFRIP-RAP·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MLW (NAVD)=··MHW (NAVD)=NOTES:· · · · PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):"COURT GREGORY"TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM TOP OF RIP-RAP:40'47'192'192'375'048'+0.2'-1.8'04-10-18TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM TOP OF MHWL:
0 4 816SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg SECTION 8/15/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ04-05-181614RMJ1425BERGESON DOCKCROSS SECTION50-IJT--07-05-18-08-15-18--JR-JR--REV. NOTE-REV. TEXT--07 OF 09MHW (+0.2' NAVD)MLW (-1.8' NAVD)12' BOAT LIFTEXISTINGRIPRAPPROPOSEDFIXEDDOCKOPTIONALHAND RAIL47' FROM TOP OF RIPRAP40' PROTRUSION FROM MHWLALL WOOD PILESTO BE PVCWRAPPED FROM 12"ABOVE MHW TO 6"BELOW SUBSTRATE13' RIPRAPX-1.1X-1
.4X-2.5X-2.425' LOATOP OFRIP-RAP
p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg 8/15/2018NESW0 30 60120SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg BDE AERIAL 8/15/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ04-05-181614RMJ1425BERGESON DOCKBDE AERIAL50RMJIJT--07-02-1807-05-1808-15-18--JRJRJR--REV. PROPERTY LINEREV. PROPERTY LINEREV. TEXT--08 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MLW (NAVD)=··MHW (NAVD)=NOTES:·PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL:"COURT GREGORY"04-10-18-1.8'+0.2'48'0375'19219247'PROPOSEDDOCKSITE ADDRESS:,3254 LAKEVIEW DRNAPLES FL 3411254'64'51'53'57'63'55'6
1
'
1
9
5
'205'215'47'LAKEVIEW DR
NESW0 3060120SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,3254 LAKEVIEW DRNAPLES FL 34112Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1614-bergeson lakeview dr dock\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\1614-BDE.dwg TRANSECT MAP 8/15/2018THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:JRRMJ04-05-181614RMJ1425BERGESON DOCKSUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY MAP50RMJIJT--07-02-1807-05-1808-15-18--JRJRJR--REV. PROPERTY LINEREV. PROPERTY LINEREV. TEXT--09 OF 09·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW·APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):·EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF):·WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX):·TIDAL DATUM:··MLW (NAVD)=··MHW (NAVD)=NOTES:"COURT GREGORY"04-10-18-1.8'+0.2'48'0375'10'200'200'NO SEAGRASSES WEREOBSERVED GROWINGWITHIN 200 FT OF THEPROPOSED PROJECT.TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECTLAKEVIEW DR
BOUNDARY SURVEY
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
BERGESON & MUELLER DOCK
3254 LAKEVIEW DRIVE
NAPLES, FL 34104
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
APRIL 4, 2018
PREPARED BY:
TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC
3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B
NAPLES, FL 34104
BERGESON & MUELLER DOCK
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
APRIL 4, 2018
Page 1 of 4
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Bergeson & Mueller proposed docking facility is located at 3254 Lakeview Drive,
identified by Parcel Number 48174720003. The property is west of Bayshore Road, just
east of Lakeview Drive, bound to the west by the waterway, and bound to the north and
south by single-family residences. The property is located in Section 14, Township 50
South, and Range 25 East. The upland portion of the property is a vacant single-family
residential lot.
Turrell, Hall & Associates was contracted to provide environmental permitting services
and one aspect is the associated Submerged Resource Survey (SRS). This survey will
provide planning and review assistance to both owners and agency reviewers in regards
to proposed project. The proposed project consists of constructing a new docking facility
within the man-made waterway portion of the Gordon River.
The SRS survey was conducted on April 4, 2018. Light east winds, mostly clear skies,
and an incoming tide resulted in visible access to the entire project area. Surface water
conditions on this day were calm which also helped to provide fair environmental
conditions for the survey. The water temperature was 74°F. Low tide occurred at 9:26
A.M (1.0’) and high tide occurred at 3:01 P.M (2.7’) on the date of the survey.
2.0 OBJECTIVE
The objective of the Submerged Resource Survey was to identify and locate any existing
submerged resources within the limits of the proposed dock project or within 200-feet of
the project area. The survey provided onsite environmental information to help
determine if the proposed project would impact any existing submerged resources and if
so would assist in reconfiguring the proposed dock in order to minimize any impacts. If
seagrasses are present within the project area it needs to be determined if the seagrass
beds are small in size or if they are part of a large seagrass bed. The general scope of
work performed at the site is summarized below.
• Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel conducted a site visit and I snorkeled these
transects within the proposed project basin and verified the location of any
submerged resources.
• Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel identified submerged resources at the site,
estimated the % of coverage, and delineated the approximate limits of any
submerged resources observed.
• Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel delineated limits via a handheld GPS
(Garmin Model 76csx).
BERGESON & MUELLER DOCK
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
APRIL 4, 2018
Page 2 of 4
3.0 METHODOLOGY
Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS
to cover the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock installation and the
surrounding area expanding out 200-feet from the project site. The components for this
survey included:
● Review of aerial photography of survey area
● Establish survey transects lines overlaid onto aerials
● Physically swim transects, GPS locate limits of submerged resources, and
determine approximate percent of coverage
● Document and photograph all findings
The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transects
spaced approximately 10-feet apart within the proposed dock footprint as shown on the
attached exhibit. The survey was expanded out 200-feet from the proposed docking
facility in order to verify no other resources were within the surrounding waterway. The
neighboring properties have existing docks which helped to provide easily identifiable
reference markers, such as dock piles which assisted in locating transects and keeping
them consistent throughout most of the survey area.
One biologist swam these transects using snorkel equipment within the surveyed area.
The other individual assisted with compiling notes and documenting findings on aerials.
Located submerged resources were photographed, the approximate percent of coverage
was quantified, and the location was delineated on an aerial photo as well as confirmed
via handheld GPS (Garmin Model 72H). The biologists used a half meter square
quadrant further broken into sections by cordage to make coverage estimates easier.
4.0 RESULTS
The substrate found within the surveyed area included one distinct classification;
silt/muck material. This substrate was found scattered throughout the entire surveyed
area. There was also scattered shell and numerous rip-rap rocks scattered along the
property mangrove shoreline. The shoreline consisted of a mangrove rip-rap shoreline
which provides habitat and cover for fish, crabs, and some barnacles, growing on and
around the rocks. The majority of the survey area was devoid of any aquatic vegetation
growth or any types of submerged resources. The lack of any submerged resources is
most likely due to the overall water quality within this portion of Naples Bay as well as
the water clarity not allowing much sunlight penetration. This was most evident in the
deeper water depths.
BERGESON & MUELLER DOCK
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
APRIL 4, 2018
Page 3 of 4
Various filamentous algae and macro algae were observed and documented growing
along the bottom sediments throughout the survey area. Also observed were numerous
fish species during the survey and a list of these species has been prepared and is
provided below as Table 1.
Table 1 – Observed Fish Species
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
The submerged resource survey was completed for the entire subject property shoreline
and expanded out 200-feet from the project area which yielded few findings. Scattered
barnacles were observed growing on the existing dock piles. The only resources
observed during the survey were fish species which included: Gray Snapper (Lutjanus
griseus), Sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus), Stripped Mullet (Mugil cephalus),
and a few Common Snooks (Centropomus undecimalis).
Negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected with the proposed docking
facility.
Common Name Scientific Name
mangrove snapper Lutjanus griseus
sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus
striped mullet Mugil cephalus
snook Centrompus undecimalis
BERGESON & MUELLER DOCK
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
APRIL 4, 2018
Page 4 of 4
Muck/silt sediment along entire subject shoreline
Mangrove shoreline