Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 10/23/2018 Item # 9A
10/23/2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2005-36, the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development, by increasing the permissible number of dwelling units from 184 to 300; by amending Ordinance Number 2004 -41, the Collier County Land Development Code by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 23.15+/- acres of land zoned rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD; by revising the development standards; by amending the master plan; adding deviations; revising developer commitments; by removing the density bonus agreement for Parcel A approved in Ordinance Number 2005-36 as an attachment to the Ordinance and by approval of an affordable housing density bonus for the added 23.15 acres that will generate 46 bonus units for low or moderate income residents. The property is located on the west side of Greenway Road east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), and north of U.S. 41, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 59.90+/- acres; and by providing an effective date [PL20170001733]. (This is a companion to Agenda Item 11.E.) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff’s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above-referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property consists of 23.15 acres to be added to the existing 36.75- acre PUD known as Regal Acres RPUD. The property is located west of Greenway Road in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. The petitioner is requesting that the Board consider an application to amend Ordinance number 05-36, the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development. The existing approved PUD for Regal Acres permits 184 two-family residential units. The rezoning proposal is to add lands to the west to accommodate a maximum of 116 additional single-family residential units on 23.15 acres of property. The proposed 23.15-acre property is comprised of five parcels, four of which are owned by Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. The applicant proposes to extend the current Majestic Circle right-of-way and develop the adjacent property, which abuts the south boundary of Naples Reserve PUD and abuts the east boundary of the Walnut Lakes PUD (Reflection Lakes subdivision). The required buffers are detailed on the Master Plan. The general pattern and style of the proposed housing development will be very similar to the existing Regal Acres PUD. The applicant intends to revise the Development Standards, amend the Master Plan, revise the Developer Commitments, and request additional deviations. Additionally, the petitioner is requesting approval of an Amended Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement, which will be a separate companion agenda item. As part of the additional requested 116 single family residential units, the applicant is requesting a recommendation of approval for an affordable housing density bonus application for the added 23.15 acres of land, as described, that will generate 46 bonus housing units. The bonus units are intended to accommodate housing opportunities for low or moderate-income residents of Collier County. The base density permitted is four dwelling units per acre, and the applicant is seeking five dwelling units per acre (DU/A). The total number of dwelling units proposed is 300. The density bonus calculation review is detailed in the GMP Consistency Review of this report. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help 9.A Packet Pg. 26 10/23/2018 offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain an adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The 23.15 acre subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County GMP. Relevant to this petition, the Urban designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including residential developments such as RPUDs. The applicant is proposing a density bonus agreement for the 23.15 acres added, which is known as Parcel B. The applicant is proposing 116 affordable residential dwelling units at a density of 5 DU/A. (116 DUs/23.15 acres = 5.01 DU/A) in Parcel B. Under the FLUE’s Density Rating System, the project is eligible for a maximum density of three DU/A, with an additional bonus of up to eight dwelling units per acre for providing affordable -workforce housing (which is proposed) for a total of 11 DU/A; eligible density is not an entitlement. The FLUE states the following, “To encourage the provision of affordable-workforce housing within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to eight (8) residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable -workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code…)” Base Density 4 DU/A CHHA Density Reduction -1 DU/A Affordable Housing Bonus +8 DU/A Maximum eligible density 11 DU/A x 59.9 acres = 658.9 DUs = 659 DUs Since the draft housing agreement is for a maximum density of five DU/A which is well below the maximum eligible density of 11 DU/A, the proposed density is consistent with the Density Rating System of the FLUE. The Consistency Review is included as Attachment C. Based upon analysis by the Comprehensive Planning Division, the proposed PUD rezone may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would 9.A Packet Pg. 27 10/23/2018 directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” The proposed PUD Amendment on the subject property was reviewed based on the 2017 AUIR Inventory Report. The TIS submitted in the application indicates that the proposed PUD will generate approximately 241 PM peak hour two-way total trips. Staff notes that the TIS further indicates that the existing development generates approximately 121 PM peak hour two-way trips and the proposed additional 116 single family residential units will generate approximately 120 PM peak hour two -way trips. The submitted TIS also contains a turn lane analysis for the intersection of Greenway Road and Majestic Circle. Staff agrees that the normally required left-in turn-lane is not required due to the number of trips on Greenway Road, the number of parcels to the north of this development served by Greenway Road and the limited ROW width on Greenway Road which also contains storm-water drainage swales which would potentially be impacted if a turn-lane were constructed. The proposed development will impact the following roadway segments: Roadway Link 2017 AUIR Existing LOS Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volume/Peak Direction 2017 Remaining Capacity Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Collier Boulevard to Joseph Lane B 3,100/East 2,089 Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Joseph Lane to Greenway Road B 2,000/East 1,075 Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Greenway Road to San Marco Drive D 1,075/East 248 *Please note: 2017 AUIR totals do not include the recently completed improvements on US 41. These trip totals are anticipated to improve with the 2018 AUIR. Based on the 2017 AUIR, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed trips for the amended project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal 9.A Packet Pg. 28 10/23/2018 Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 22.46 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 5.62 (25%) acres of the existing native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an amendment to the existing Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development and rezone of 23.15 acres to add it to the RPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for RPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed RPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9.A Packet Pg. 29 10/23/2018 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed RPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested RPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot (“reasonably”) be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a “core” question…) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 9.A Packet Pg. 30 10/23/2018 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed RPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the RPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney’s Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval (HFAC) COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PUDZ-PL20170001733 on September 6, 2018 and September 20, 2018, and by a vote of 6 to 0 recommended to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval with stipulations. The CCPC approval recommendation was unanimous. However, there is public opposition to this petition and the agenda item will be placed on the regular Public Hearing Agenda. The CCPC stipulations include the following: 1. Elimination of Deviation Request number 3. 2. Limit the Permitted Accessory Uses in the preserve area. 3. Add minimum preserve width to the Master Plan document for the southern preserve area and the central preserve area. 4. Add an 8-foot wall to the Master Plan document or as an attachment to the PUD document. 5. In the Landscaping subsection, specifically describe the buffer and add a buffer exhibit. 6. Add an 8-foot security fence and position it along the rear property lines of specific properties. 7. Only single-family detached residential buildings are permitted. 8. Remove the single-family attached column from Table II of Residential Development Standards. 9. Add a developer commitment to participate in the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program for initiatives along Greenway Road. 10. The minimum rear setback for the play structure shall be 60 feet. 11. The cross-section document detailing the dimensions of play structure setbacks shall be added to the PUD document as an exhibit. 12. The basketball court shall be located north of Majestic Circle and shown of the Master Plan document. 13. An 8-foot wall shall be constructed along the south property line of the Parcel B recreation area. 14. The recreation area and basketball court hours of operation shall be dawn to dusk. 15. No lighting and no amplified outdoor sound are permitted at the recreation area and basketball court. 9.A Packet Pg. 31 10/23/2018 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant’s request to rezone the Regal Acres PUD. Prepared by: C. James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. MEMO to CCPC 9-20-18 (DOC) 2. FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (DOCX) 3. Attach C. GMP Consistency Rev Regal Acres (PDF) 4. Ordinance - 092518(2) (PDF) 5. Attach E. Correspondence from the public (PDF) 6. Public Correspondence (PDF) 7. Authorization regarding lake interconnection (PDF) 8. [Linked] Backup Materials Regal Acres (PDF) 9. Legal Ad - Agenda ID 6777 (PDF) 9.A Packet Pg. 32 10/23/2018 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.A Doc ID: 6777 Item Summary: This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2005-36, the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development, by increasing the permissible number of dwelling units from 184 to 300; by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 23.15+/- acres of land zoned rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD; by revising the development standards; by amending the master plan; adding deviations; revising developer commitments; by removing the density bonus agreement for Parcel A approved in Ordinance Number 2005-36 as an attachment to the Ordinance and by approval of an affordable housing density bonus for the added 23.15 acres that will generate 46 bonus units for low or moderate income residents. The property is located on the west side of Greenway Road east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), and north of U.S. 41, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 59.90+/- acres; and by providing an effective date [PL20170001733]. (This is a companion to Agenda Item 11.E.) Meeting Date: 10/23/2018 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: James Sabo 09/26/2018 4:52 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 09/26/2018 4:52 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Michael Bosi Additional Reviewer Completed 09/27/2018 12:58 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 09/28/2018 5:01 PM Growth Management Department Jeanne Marcella Level 1 Reviewer Completed 10/02/2018 8:26 AM Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 10/02/2018 12:56 PM Growth Management Department James C French Deputy Department Head Review Completed 10/02/2018 1:19 PM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 10/16/2018 8:37 AM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 10/16/2018 8:42 AM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 10/16/2018 9:08 AM County Attorney's Office Emily Pepin CAO Preview Completed 10/16/2018 9:19 AM 9.A Packet Pg. 33 10/23/2018 County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 10/16/2018 9:36 AM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 10/16/2018 3:39 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 10/23/2018 9:00 AM 9.A Packet Pg. 34 PUDZ-PL20170001733, REGAL ACRES RPUD September 10, 2017 MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: September 20, 2018 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20170001733, PUDZ REGAL ACRES The CCPC heard petition PUDZ-PL20170001733, for the Regal Acres RPUD on September 6, 2018. The CCPC voted 6-0 to approve the petition subject to the following revisions to the PUD Document and the CCPC voted to bring the petition back on the consent agenda at the September 20, 2018 hearing: The denial of deviation #3 related to trees Reduction in the preserve uses Addition of the minimum width of preserves to the PUD master plan Showing locations of the 8-foot wall Articulation of the proposed buffers as discussed Addition of an 8-foot security fence along back of lots between preserves To permit only fee simple single-family detached houses Addition of a detailed buffer exhibit Relocation of the recreation area to the hammerhead road area Addition of a reference to the recreation area location under 3.3.E The above revisions have been incorporated into the PUD Document. Please see the attached strike thru and underline PUD Document and Exhibits. 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: MEMO to CCPC 9-20-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 1 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2018 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20170001733 REGAL ACRES, HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owners: Agent: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34113 GHU, LLC and Newell Creek, LLC 7975 Newell Creek Drive Mentor, OH 44060 Applicant: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34113 Laura DeJohn, AICP Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone 23.15 acres of land from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district to be added to the existing Regal Acres RPUD for a 59.90 acre project; and, the additional density of 116 dwelling units which includes 46 affordable bonus units for low or moderate income residents. The property is comprised of five parcels. Four owned by Habitat for Humanity and one under a purchase agreement. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 23.15 acres to be added to the existing 36.75-acre PUD known as Regal Acres RPUD. The property is located west of Greenway Road in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (see location map, page 2). The proposed Master Plan is included as Attachment B. 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 2 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 3 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting a rezoning of 23.15 acres from Rural Agricultural to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for the purpose of adding lands to the existing RPUD and adding density. The applicant intends to amend Ordinance number 05-36, which is the Regal Acres PUD. The existing approved PUD for Regal Acres permits 184 two-family residential units. The rezoning proposal is to add lands to the west to accommodate a maximum of 116 additional single- family residential units on 23.15 acres of property. The proposed 23.15-acre property is comprised of five parcels, four of which are owned by Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. The applicant proposes to extend the current Majestic Circle right-of-way and develop the adjacent property, which abuts the south boundary of Naples Reserve PUD and abuts the east boundary of the Walnut Lakes PUD (Reflection Lakes subdivision). The required buffers are detailed on the Master Plan. The general pattern and style of the proposed housing development will be very similar to the existing Regal Acres PUD. The applicant intends to revise the Development Standards, amend the Master Plan, revise the Developer Commitments, and request additional deviations. Specific details for these requests are detailed in that section of the report. As part of the additional requested 116 single family residential units, the applicant is requesting a recommendation of approval for an affordable housing density bonus application for the added 23.15 acres of land, as described, that will generate 46 bonus housing units. The bonus units are intended to accommodate housing opportunities for low or moderate-income residents of Collier County. The base density permitted is four dwelling units per acre, and the applicant is seeking five dwelling units per acre (DU/A). The total number of dwelling units proposed is 300. The density bonus calculation review is detailed in the GMP Consistency Review of this report. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Single-family residential homes, zoned RPUD Naples Reserve 1.67 DU/A South: Single-family West Wind mobile home park, zoned MH Mobile Home East: Single-family residential homes, vacant agricultural, zoned A Rural Agricultural West: Single-family residential homes, zoned RPUD Walnut Lakes 3 DU/A 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 4 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Aerial Map (County Property Appraiser) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County GMP. Relevant to this petition, the Urban designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including residential developments such as RPUDs. The applicant is proposing a density bonus agreement for the 23.15 acres added, which is known as Parcel B. The applicant is proposing 116 affordable residential dwelling units at a density of 5 DU/A. (116 DUs/23.15 acres = 5.01 DU/A) in Parcel B. Under the FLUE’s Density Rating System, the project is eligible for a maximum density of 3 dwelling units per acre (DU/A), with an additional bonus of up to 8 dwelling units per acre for providing affordable-workforce housing (which is proposed) for a total of 11 DU/A; eligible 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 5 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 density is not an entitlement… Since the proposed for a maximum density of 5 DU/A which is well below the maximum eligible density of 11 DU/A, the proposed density is consistent with the Density Rating System of the FLUE. Under the FLUE’s Density Rating System, the project is eligible for a maximum density of three DU/A, with an additional bonus of up to eight dwelling units per acre for providing affordable- workforce housing (which is proposed) for a total of 11 DU/A; eligible density is not an entitlement. The FLUE states the following, “To encourage the provision of affordable-workforce housing within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to eight (8) residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable-workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code…)” Base Density 4 DU/A CHHA Density Reduction -1 DU/A Affordable Housing Bonus +8 DU/A Maximum eligible density 11 DU/A x 59.9 acres = 658.9 DUs = 659 DUs Since the draft housing agreement is for a maximum density of five DU/A which is well below the maximum eligible density of 11 DU/A, the proposed density is consistent with the Density Rating System of the FLUE. The Consistency Review is included as Attachment C. Based upon analysis by the Comprehensive Planning Division, the proposed PUD rezone may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project tr affic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 6 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” The proposed PUD Amendment on the subject property was reviewed based on the 2017 AUIR Inventory Report. The TIS submitted in the application indicates that the proposed PUD will generate approximately 241 PM peak hour two-way total trips. Staff notes that the TIS further indicates that the existing development generates approximately 121 PM peak hour two-way trips and the proposed additional 116 single family residential units will generate approximately 120 PM peak hour two-way trips. The submitted TIS also contains a turn lane analysis for the intersection of Greenway Road and Majestic Circle. Staff agrees that the normally required left- in turn-lane is not required due to the number of trips on Greenway Road, the number of parcels to the north of this development served by Greenway Road and the limited ROW width on Greenway Road which also contains storm-water drainage swales which would potentially be impacted if a turn-lane were constructed. The proposed development will impact the following roadway segments: Roadway Link 2017 AUIR Existing LOS Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volume/Peak Direction 2017 Remaining Capacity Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Collier Boulevard to Joseph Lane B 3,100/East 2,089 Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Joseph Lane to Greenway Road B 2,000/East 1,075 Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Greenway Road to San Marco Drive D 1,075/East 248 *Please note: 2017 AUIR totals do not include the recently completed improvements on US 41. These trip totals are anticipated to improve with the 2018 AUIR. Based on the 2017 AUIR, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed trips for the amended project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 7 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 22.46 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 5.62 (25%) acres of the existing native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. Housing Element Review: Community and Human Services staff has reviewed this petition's Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement to ensure the document contains the appropriate language to address the proposal to provide affordable housing. The Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement is a separate approval by the Board from the PUD Ordinance document. Community and Human Services finds the proposed development to be consistent with Section 2.06.00 of the LDC and the Housing Element of the GMP. The Regal Acres Parcel B development will have a maximum of 116 owner-occupied residential units targeted to low and moderate- income households for a gross density of 5 units per acre. These owner-occupied homes will have approximately 1,400 square feet of living area and will be a minimum of 3 bedrooms and one bath. Drainage: The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and/or platting (PPL). Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the RPUD petition to address environmental concerns. The PUD Master Plan provides a 5.62-acre preserve, which meets the minimum 25% native preservation requirement in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. No listed animal species were observed on the property; however, data obtained from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission indicates the project is located within panther protection zones which will require a panther management plan be required at PPL or SDP review. Additionally, the data also indicates the presence of black bear in the area. A black bear management plan will also need to be included at PPL or SDP review. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 8 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Landscape Review: The landscape buffers depicted on the Master Plan are consistent with the LDC requirements. If after removal of exotics from the preserve located on the Western portion, the preserve does not satisfy the requirements of a Type ‘B’ buffer, trees will need to be added into the preserve in accordance with section 3.05.07 of the LDC and a single row of 5’ high shrubs spaced 4’ on-center will be required on the perimeter berm shown on the ‘Typical Preserve Section’ on sheet B-2. The shrubs, if required, must be native per section 4.06.05.J.a. School District: At this time, there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development either within the concurrency service areas the development is located within or the adjacent concurrency service areas at the elementary, middle and high school levels. This finding is for planning and informational purposes only and does not constitute either a reservation of capacity or a finding of concurrency for the proposed project. At the time of site plan or plat, the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity within the concurrency service area the development is located within and adjacent concurrency service areas such that the level of service standards are not exceeded. Utilities Review: The project lies within the potable water and south wastewater service areas of the Collier County Water-Sewer District. Water and wastewater services are readily available via existing infrastructure along Majestic Circle. System capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit (SDP or PPL) review, and a commitment to provide service will be established upon permit approval. Zoning Services Review: Zoning Division staff has evaluated the proposed uses related to their intensity and reviewed the proposed development standards for the project. The Zoning Division also evaluated the location project and the potential traffic generation. The proposed single-family residential project is located north of Tamiami Trail East in an area that is still utilized for agricultural purposes. However, there has been additional commercial and residential development beginning to occur along this portion of the East Trail. The proposed site is currently vacant and wooded. Two adjacent neighborhoods are developed as PUD, which is Naples Reserve to the north and Walnut Lakes (Reflection Lakes). Both adjacent PUD’s are developed with lower density as there was no affordable housing density bonus requested. The Naples Reserve PUD was developed at 1.67 DU/A and the Walnut Lakes PUD was developed at three DU/A. West Wind mobile home park is not zoned PUD and was developed at approximately 10 DU/A. While the applicant has requested an affordable housing density bonus, the intensity of the development appears to be reasonable and has been found consistent with the GMP. With respect to Development Standards, the proposed standards are appropriate based on the single-family residential use. The Development Standards are included in the backup material. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 9 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: (Zoning Division staff responses in non-bold). 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Zoning Division staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and believes the uses and property development regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area. The Public Utilities Division further states the Water distribution and wastewater collection mains are readily available within the Majestic Circle right-of-way, and there is adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve the proposed PUD. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office and demonstrate unified control. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the petition and analyzed it for consistency with goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. They have found the proposed amendment to be consistent with the GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. There is no deviation from the required usable open space as submitted. Compliance with approved standards would be demonstrated at the time of SDP. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Compliance with all other applicable concurrency management regulations is required, including but not limited to plat plans or site development plans. The Transportation Division further states that the roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 10 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 will be addressed at the time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to further demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. The Public Utilities Division further states that Collier County has sufficient treatment capacity for potable water and wastewater service to the project. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. For the proposed single-family residential use, there is adequate supporting infrastructure to accommodate this project, including Collier County Water-Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains. Adequate public facility requirements will be addressed when future development approvals are sought. The Public Utilities Division further states that the area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including Collier County Water-Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. The scope of any system improvements will be determined at the time of SDP or PPL permit review. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. Five deviations are proposed in the request to rezone to RPUD. Please see the deviations section of the report. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following when applicable.” Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below: (Zoning Division staff responses in non-bold): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff has determined the petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern related to surrounding properties is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this report. The proposed single-family 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 11 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 residential uses will not likely change the existing land use patterns in the area. Both Naples Reserve and Walnut Lakes PUD’s are developed with a similar residential pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is zoned Rural Agricultural with RPUD residential uses surround the property. The application is to rezone to RPUD, which would not create an isolated district. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed RPUD boundaries are logical and appropriate. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not specifically necessary. However, the applicant believes the rezoning is necessary to accommodate the construction of low and moderate-income (workforce) housing in Collier County. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change is not likely to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The existing neighborhood is residential, and the proposal is expanding with additional residential dwellings. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The Transportation Division states that the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. It is not anticipated that the rezone request to RPUD will create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage for this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County environmental staff will evaluate the stormwater management system and design criteria at the time of SDP or PPL. 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 12 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed rezone to RPUD is not likely to reduce light or air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. Property value is affected by many factors. It is driven by market conditions and is generally a subjective determination. Zoning alone is not likely to adversely affect the property values. Generally, market conditions will prevail. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Most of the adjacent property is already developed as residential use. The approval of the rezone request from A to RPUD is not likely to deter development activity of surrounding property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed rezone to RPUD complies with the GMP and is found consistent, then it is consistent with public policy and the change does not result in the granting of a special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is determined to be consistent with public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning, however, it is nearly landlocked. Additionally, the applicant cannot use the property as they have proposed without rezoning to RPUD and getting approval for the affordable housing density bonus. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The Zoning Division staff determination is the proposed uses are not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The application was reviewed and found compliant with the GMP and the LDC. The Zoning Division staff does not review other sites related to a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 13 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the proposed rezone request to RPUD would require significant site alteration. The site is vacant and heavily wooded and razing, and land balancing would be required prior to any development activity at the site. The development standards would be applied during the SDP and plat process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project must comply with the criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF) and must be consistent with applicable goals and objectives of the GMP related to adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by Comprehensive Planning staff for consistency with the GMP as part of the amendment process, and they find it to be consistent. The Public Utilities Division further states that the activity proposed by this amendment will have no adverse impact on public utilities facility adequacy. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking five deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The petitioner’s rationale and staff analysis/recommendation is outlined below. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, “Street System Requirements,” which calls for minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet. This request is to allow for a 50-foot right-of- way minimum width for a limited section of the private street network, extending for a length of approximately 350 feet and terminating in a hammerhead or Y configuration , provided that the water main will be centrally located in the 10-foot space between the on-street parking and the right-of-way line. Petitioner’s Justification: Minimum right-of-way width of 50 feet is requested to address a limited section of the private street network in the northern vicinity of the site. This segment of the private street network is approximately 350 feet in length and will serve approximately 20 homesites at the most. It is appropriate for this intimately scaled street to have 10-foot wide lanes corresponding to a more context-sensitive human scale. This reduces impervious area and reduces land dedicated to the roadway by ten feet, which in turn allows for more open space throughout the site that provides more community benefit. A 50-foot right-of-way is adequate to achieve safe and efficient vehicular, emergency vehicle, and pedestrian movement while satisfying utility and drainage needs in this location. Aside from this segment of the 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 14 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 private street network, the other roads within the RPUD will be consistent with a minimum right-of- way width of 60 feet. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable as it’s a stub street. The deviation should be contingent upon approval by the local Fire District. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, “On-Premises Directional Signs,” which requires on-premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of the roadway, paved surface or back of curb. This deviation requests a minimum setback of 5 feet from the edge of private roadway/drive aisle. Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation will allow locational flexibility for directional signage internal to the RPUD. This also allows for helpful directional signage to be located between the edge of the roadway and the sidewalk. A unified design theme will apply to all signage throughout the community, thereby ensuring a cohesive appearance and attractiveness. All directional signage will meet the Clear Sight Distance requirements in accordance with LDC Section 6.06.05. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable as the proposed residential project has higher density and the design is more compact. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a, “Trees and Palms,” which states that no more than 30% of required canopy trees may be substituted by palms . This deviation requests to increase the allowable substitution of palms to up to 60% of required canopy trees used to satisfy individual residential lot requirements (of LDC section 4.06.05.A.1). Petitioner’s Justification: The intent is to relocate the required residential lot -tree plantings to the right-of-way and common areas where they can be maintained by the HOA and provide enhanced aesthetics around the walkways and on-street parking. Street trees may be planted in close proximity to underground utilities and sidewalks. Allowing up to 60% of the plantings in this area to be palms will reduce the degree of tree health issues in the future, minimize the impact of street trees on the utilities, and reduce the likelihood of roots heaving sidewalks or on-street parking. The quality appearance of a well-landscaped community and treelined streets is still accomplished and is more sustainable with the proposed palms substituting for up to 60% of canopy trees. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The LDC does not include limitations on the number of palm trees for a Street Tree Plan. The petitioner’s justification seeks to allow palm trees planted within the Street Tree Plan to satisfy the canopy tree requirement for residential lots. LDC Section 4.06.05 A.1. requires one canopy tree per 3,000 sq. ft. of pervious area for each residential lot, and allows developments with a street tree program and lots of less than 3,000 sq. ft. of pervious open space to utilize street trees located directly in front of the lot to count toward that lot’s required canopy tree. Since the residential tree requirement is on a lot-by-lot basis, only one tree is required for any lot with less than 3,000 sq. ft. of pervious area. Therefore, increasing the allowable percentage of palms to 60% would still require one hardwood canopy tree per lot. Since the LDC does not limit the number of palms within a Street Tree Plan, and the proposed deviation does not accomplish the applicant’s intent to utilize palm trees within the street right-of-way for the required residential canopy tree requirement, Staff recommends denial of this deviation. 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 15 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, “Fences and Walls” which calls for a maximum fence or wall height of 6 feet in residential components of PUDs. This deviation requests allowance for a maximum wall height of 8 feet for buffering to the southern property line and protection from the drainage ditch to the south. Petitioner’s Justification: The proposed deviation will provide the adjacent West Wind mobile home park and future neighbors additional visual screening and provide a protective barrier between the proposed recreational area and the existing drainage ditch to the south. This enhances aesthetics and protects the children who will be likely to play in the recreation area. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable as the proposed fence deviation provides additional protection related to the drainage area. Deviation #5 Seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, “Dead End Streets,” which calls for dead ends streets to terminate in a cul-de-sac. This deviation requests the ability to end one of the street segments within the PUD with a hammerhead or Y configuration as approved by the local Fire District. Petitioner’s Justification: This deviation request applies to the limited section of the private street network in the northern vicinity of the site. This segment of the private street network is approximately 350 feet in length and will serve approximately 20 homesites at the most. A full-sized cul-de-sac on a short street of approximately 350 feet is a very inefficient use of space. The alternative fire department turnaround options of a hammerhead or “Y” can more effectively serve the circulation needs of this specific location, resulting in enhancement to the overall development by providing added amenities, landscaping, and open space while still providing adequate room for fire trucks to maneuver safely in the proposed location. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable as the proposed residential project has higher density and the design is more compact. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on June 4, 2018, 5:30 PM, at the First Haitian Baptist Mission of Naples 14600 Tamiami Trail E. Naples, FL. For further information, please see the NIM Summary information in the backup material. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2 -1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on August 28, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 16 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Zoning Division staff recommends the CCPC forward petition PUDZ-PL20170001733 Regal Acres rezone and amendment to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, with the exception of Deviation Request #3 and; contingent upon approval by the local fire district for Deviations #1 and #5, and, Zoning Division Staff recommends the CCPC forward PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres Affordable Housing Density Bonus Application for Parcel B to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: A) Proposed RPUD Ordinance, Regal Acres B) Proposed Master Plan for Parcel B, Regal Acres C) FLUE Consistency Review D) Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement Regal Acres E) Public Correspondence 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: FInal Staff Rept Regal Ac w CAO revisions 8-29-18 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Zoning Division · 2800 North Horseshoe Drive · Naples, FL 34104 · 239-252-2400 Page 1 of 3 Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division Date: May 10, 2018 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ - PL20170001733 (REV: 3) PETITION NAME: Regal Acres REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting to rezone 23.15 acres from the A, Rural Agricultural zoning district to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district, Regal Acres RPUD (Parcel B), to allow a maximum of 116 residential dwelling units (DUs) on Parcel B; and consideration and approval of an affordable housing density bonus agreement authorizing the developer to utilize affordable housing bonus density units in the development of this project. Ordinance #05-36, established the existing 36.75-acre Regal Acres RPUD (Parcel A), an affordable housing development with the original 184 residential dwelling units of Regal Acres RPUD. The total acreage (Parcel A and Parcel B development for the Regal Acres RPUD is proposed to be ±59.9 acres (23.15a + 36.75a = 59.5 acres) with a maximum total of 300 residential dwelling units. Submittal 2 reflects that 25% of native vegetation preserve is of 22.46 acres not of 23.15 acres on Parcel B on the revised Master Plan. Environmental commitments were added to revised Ordinance text for panther and black bear management. Revised Statement of Utility Provisions included in 2nd submittal. Submittal 3 included an authorization for interconnection of lake system between Regal Acres RPUD Parcel A and Regal Acres RPUD Parcel B. Submittal 3 also included revisions, requested by the County Attorney, to the PUD document. LOCATION: The subject site is comprised of five parcels totaling 23.15 acres and is located approximately 0.25 miles west of Greenway Road, ±3.1 miles east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), and ± 0.56 miles north of Tamiami Trail East (US 41), in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Relevant to this petition, the Urban designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including residential developments such as RPUDs. With this application packet, the petitioner submitted a strike-through, underline revision of the previous housing agreement for Regal Acres RPUD. The draft housing agreement is between Habitat for Humanity for Collier County, Inc. and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners and will replace the original housing agreement. The agreement is for the developer to construct a total of 300 affordable residential dwelling units on 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Attach C. GMP Consistency Rev Regal Acres (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Zoning Division · 2800 North Horseshoe Drive · Naples, FL 34104 · 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 3 the total ±59.9 gross acres at a density of 5 units per gross acre on the property (5 DU/A 8 59.5 A = 299.5 DUs = 300 DUs). The original Regal Acres housing agreement was to provide 184 affordable residential dwelling units on 36.75 acres at a density of 5 DU/A per affordable housing agreement (5 DU/A * 36.75 A = 183.75 DUs = 184DUs). Under the FLUE’s Density Rating System, the project is eligible for a maximum density of 3 dwelling units per acre (DU/A), with an additional bonus of up to 8 dwelling units per acre for providing affordable-workforce housing (which is proposed) for a total of 11 DU/A; eligible density is not an entitlement. The FLUE states the following, “To encourage the provision of affordable-workforce housing within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to eight (8) residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable-workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code…)” Base Density 4 DU/A CHHA Density Reduction -1 DU/A Affordable Housing Bonus +8 DU/A Maximum eligible density 11 DU/A x 59.9 acres = 658.9 DUs = 659 DUs Since the draft housing agreement is for a maximum density of 5 DU/A which is well below the maximum eligible density of 11 DU/A, the proposed density is consistent with the Density Rating System of the FLUE. In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following FLUE policies (in italics) are implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. Objective 7: Objective 7 of the FLUE states: “Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the County, where applicable, and as follows:” Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The subject site fronts on Greenway Road, a local road, but does not abut an arterial or collector road. Greenway Road connects to Tamiami Trail East (US 41) to the south.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit ‘C’ PUD Master Plan shows a loop road within part of the currently developed portion of the project site that will connect to an additional loop road for the future development on the 23.15 acres being added to the RPUD.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Attach C. GMP Consistency Rev Regal Acres (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Zoning Division · 2800 North Horseshoe Drive · Naples, FL 34104 · 239-252-2400 Page 3 of 3 streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [Exhibit ‘C’ PUD Master Plan shows no interconnections with adjoining properties. To the north is a gated, platted and partially developed residential PUD, Naples Reserve Golf Club, and vacant (A) Rural, Agricultural zoned land. To the west is an almost fully developed residential area, Walnut Lakes PUD; interconnections do not appear feasible. To the south of the additional 23.15 acres is a large, fully developed mobile home community, and single family homes exist in the (A) Rural, Agricultural zoning district to the south of the original Regal Acres RPUD; given that the existing developments do not have any accommodations for an interconnection, it does not appear feasible. Comprehensive Planning leaves review of the Transportation Element to Transportation Planning staff.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [Exhibit A lists a number of different permissible housing types. The developer, Habitat for Humanity, is applying to construct affordable- workforce housing. Exhibit ‘C’ PUD Master Plan shows sidewalks throughout the RPUD. No deviations for sidewalks are proposed with this submittal. Open space is provided for as required by the LDC, with no deviation requested. Although clubhouses, meeting rooms and community buildings are listed in Exhibit ‘A: B.2.’ as permitted accessory uses, no facility is shown on the Exhibit ‘C’ PUD Master Plan. Civic activities often utilize meeting rooms in a community building or clubhouse, when a facility is constructed by the developer.] CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, the proposed PUD may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division PUDZ-PL2017-1733 Regal Acres R3.docx 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Attach C. GMP Consistency Rev Regal Acres (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Ordinance - 092518(2) (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Apartment Name Zip Code 1 Bed Min 1 Bed Max 2 Bed Min 2 Bed Max 3 Bed 3 bed Max Goodlette Arms (HUD)34102 NA NA NA NA NA NA Jasmine Cay 34102 NA NA NA NA NA NA George Washington Carver34102 NA NA NA NA NA NA Gordon River 34102 NA NA 1,100.00$ 1,200.00$ 1,200.00$ 1,300.00$ Bryn Mawr 34104 1,100.00$ 1,175.00$ 1,275.00$ 1,300.00$ NA NA Ibis Club 34104 NA NA NA NA NA NA Meadow Lakes 34104 1,229.00$ NA 1,455.00$ NA 1,635.00$ NA River Reach 34104 1,214.00$ NA 1,544.00$ NA NA NA Saddlebrook Village 34104 NA NA NA NA NA NA Tuscan Isle 34104 NA NA NA NA NA NA Villas of Capri 34104 755.00$ NA 907.00$ NA 1,047.00$ Orchid Run 34104 1,581.00$ 2,043.00$ 1,846.00$ 2,375.00$ 2,173.00$ 2,795.00$ Belvedere 34105 1,329.00$ 1,369.00$ 1,337.00$ 1,685.00$ NA NA La Costa 34105 1,250.00$ 1,628.00$ 1,426.00$ 1,833.00$ NA NA Bermuda Island 34109 1,249.00$ 1,349.00$ 1,570.00$ 1,655.00$ 1,675.00$ 2,005.00$ Laguna Bay 34109 1,285.00$ 1,365.00$ 1,405.00$ 1,505.00$ NA NA Oasis - Arbor Walk 34109 1,175.00$ 1,320.00$ 1,270.00$ 1,560.00$ NA NA Summer Lakes I 34109 503.00$ NA 952.00$ NA 1,103.00$ NA Summer Lakes II 34109 NA NA 952.00$ NA 1,103.00$ NA Summer Wind - Arium Gulfshore34109 1,180.00$ 1,679.00$ 1,270.00$ 2,167.00$ NA NA Windsong Club 34109 NA NA NA NA NA NA Bear Creek 239-514-060034109 NA NA NA NA NA NA Meadow Brook Preserve - Turtle Creek341101,444.00$ NA 1,513.00$ NA 1,712.00$ NA Somerset Palms - Arbor View34110 NA NA 1,399.00$ NA 1,599.00$ NA Heron Park - Point at Naples34112 1,225.00$ NA 1,375.00$ NA 1,600.00$ NA Naples 701 34112 1,005.00$ 1,170.00$ NA NA NA NA Osprey Landing 34112 NA NA NA NA NA NA Shadowood Park 34112 NA NA NA NA NA NA Collier Housing Alternatives34112 NA NA NA NA NA NA College Park 34113 NA NA 942.00$ NA 1,095.00$ NA Whistlers Cove 34113 NA NA NA NA NA NA Aster Lely Resort 34113 1,223.00$ 1,831.00$ 1,528.00$ 2,210.00$ 1,915.00$ 2,733.00$ Sierra Grande 34113 1,276.00$ 1,840.00$ 1,393.00$ 2,037.00$ 1,618.00$ 2,445.00$ San Marino - Aventine 34114 NA NA NA NA NA NA Berkshire Reserve 34116 NA NA 1,595.00$ 1,700.00$ 2,000.00$ NA Coral Palms 34116 860.00$ 970.00$ 1,020.00$ 1,230.00$ NA NA Heritage - Mer Soleil 34116 978.00$ 1,125.00$ 933.00$ 1,353.00$ NA NA Naples Place I-III 34116 NA NA NA NA NA NA Noah's Landing 34116 NA NA NA NA NA NA Northgate Club 34116 NA NA NA NA NA NA Sabal Key 34116 1,110.00$ 1,820.00$ 1,165.00$ 1,890.00$ NA NA Waverly Place 34116 1,235.00$ NA 1,375.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,507.00$ NA Whistlers Green 34116 773.00$ NA 919.00$ NA 1,058.00$ NA Housing Alternatives of SWFL34116 NA NA NA NA NA NA Brittany Bay I & II 34119 861.00$ NA 978.00$ NA 1,109.00$ NA Apartment Pricing Per Website 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Malibu Lakes 34119 1,249.00$ NA 1,599.00$ 1,749.00$ 1,849.00$ 2,005.00$ Crestview Park 34142 Crestview Park II 34142 Cypress Run 34142 Eden Gardens II 34142 Farm Worker Village 34142 Garden Lakes Apts 34142 Heritage Villas of Immokalee34142 Oakhaven 34142 Sanders Pines 34142 So Villas Immokalee 34142 Summer Glen 34142 Timber Ridge of Immokalee34142 Willowbrook Place 34142 1 Bed Min 1 Bed Max 2 Bed Min 2 Bed Max 3 Bed 3 bed Max Average 1,128.71$ 1,477.43$ 1,287.25$ 1,702.88$ 1,499.89$ 2,213.83$ Zip Code Total 34102 4 34104 9 34105 2 34109 8 34110 2 34112 5 34113 4 34114 1 34116 10 34119 2 34142 13 Immokalee 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) BrownleeMichael From: Senl: To: Subject: Janet OConnell <janetoc8@yahoo.com> Tuesday, June 05,2018 12:49 PM FialaDonna; bod@reflectionlakesatnaples.com: Jane Kraska; Errol Devore Fw: Your meeting last night in southeast Naples Categories:PRINTED Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android --- Fovarded Message -*- From: "Janet OConnell" <janetocS@yahoo.com> To: "nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org" <nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org> Sent: Tue, Jun 5, 2018 al 12:47 PM Subject: Your meeling last night in southeast Naples To Mr. Kouloheras: lwas atthe meeting Iast night and spoke aboutthe overbuilding, etc and mentionedwhat has happened in Broward County. The attempt by your insulting and overcontrolling attorney to interrupt and take the microphone away from me was totally inappropriate and close to violating my 1st Amendment rights. I have always been a supporter o, Habitat and often visit your Restore on 41 to buy some smallish item for a few dollars which is all I can afford. I have worked hard since age 16...1 am now closing in on 68. I have known very hard times and have never asked nor expected any help from anyone. I still do tutoring part time when available which has helped me to pay off the huge Hurricane Assessment of 51800 at Reflection Lakes. My final 5600 payment is due on iune Lsth. I live on the cheaper street of Winchester court (condo/villa area) and in April 2016 I paid less than S200K. The Preserve behind us is exactly that. Your presentation was very slic( as our Master Association President said to you. He didn't even indicate his title, because most of us in Reflection Lakes are very down to earth, many years hard working, middle class folks. The maiority of us are definitely NOT racist nor discriminatory. Yes, most of my life savings went into my condo/villa where I figured I could live peacefully for maybe 15-18 years before my life ends. Now your organization comes along wanting to build on the Preserve and I guess you consider it a DONE DEAL since you have already figured that the Rezoning will go yourwayl lf it does, which will bevery sad and beyond disturbing, ourbeautywill e nd a nd the density factor that you don't really care about will continue to take over and yes, this is already on the way to Broward County Westl My other point and direct question is...What if you had a tract of land down in port Royal or the Estates area of Marco lsland? How would you handle a major outcry of opposition from many million dollar owners in luxury areas? I realize that this is a mut€ point. But you need to also look at your building in Broward County and how poorly maintained those have become I The years go by and blight comes because of overbuilding. The developers have made their many millions at our expense. You too have a huge budget of over $90million! I am a nobody who has dedicateri her life to helping many thousands of studenis and parents over 30 years. I made a pittance salary and my state pension is pathetig not to mention the lack of decent medical and dental benefitsl My mother and I lived in a tiny house in Pompano Beach and then when I could afford a small condo in Lighthouse Point, I moved us to the other side of Federal Highway to a little bit better area. ldrove every day out to Coral springs. As lsaid, I never expected anything to be made easier for me. Your expectations are a bit too much since you think Rezoning is appropriate and you already have your plans to build. ln my mind that is putting the cart before the horse, but you must already know that the winds are going to blow favorably your way. Moreover, lhere a re plenty of affordable housing dwellings off of Manatee Road and along 41 west of here. And by the way, how on earth do you expect the extra kids to be taken into the already very sad, decrepit Manatee schools that Collier County Schools could care ,ess about improving?l Frankly, those portables should be condemned. I am a realist. I am also 100% honest and have always done the right thing, Finally, your lawyer should also do the right thing and at least send me an email apology. Respectfully, Ms Janet M. O'Connell 14160 Winchester Ct. #1801 1 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Brown leeM ichael From: Sent: To: Subject: Janet OConnell <janetoc8@yahoo.com> Wednesday, June 06, 2018 9:49 AN4 FialaDonna A followup to yesterday's email Categories:ATTENTION, PRINTED Hello again Mrs. Fiala...l had sent a decent email to the Collier Pres. of Habitat yesterday. His reply back to me was not nice. I can forward it to you if you want to read it. He accused me of not doing my homewor( not living long enough in Collier County, and he has no interest in even knowing about Habitat in Broward County. I replied back that I have lived in Collier Cty for 14 years, that as a retired educator with advanced degrees (also Phi Beta Kappa from the University of Florida) I always have done My Homework, and that he should drive over to Broward if he doesn't believe my factsl Frankly, I am now angry which I seldom allow myself to become I Our Master Board at Reflectio n Lakes and Naples Reserve are also a ngry and what Habitat needs to understand is: WE DO NOT WANT TO BE REZONED FROM OUR CURRENT AGRICULTURAT TO WHAT ANY DEVELOPER WANTS IN ORDER TO BUILD. HAbitAt,S AttitUdE With thEiT NASTY attorney wants NO OPPOSITION and they are determined to get what they want. Furthermore, Habitat's normal Modus Operandi is to go into blighted areas to improve housing for those less fortunate. Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes are NOT BLIGHTED, nor do we want to have that happen since our investments here range from S22oK-Sl.million plus(especially at Naples Reserve)l But again the point is to stop the building in our Preserved area which is ZONED AGRICULTURALI This has nothing to do with racism or discrimination. We have a diversity in RL, and my neighbors are minority and great people who work very hard and pay a very high rent! You will get flooded with mail and emails which are now becoming a full fledged campaign. We are b€gging you and the other County Commissioners to NOT REZONE OUR AREA. please do NOT make this a DONE DEAL for Habitat which is what they already figure they have, We recently lost to the Storage facility that is being built across from Naples Reserve Blvd entrance on 41. We will NOT stand idly by and accept any rezoning to allow any additional acreage to be bought and built on by any entity that destroys our beautiful Preserve area. As always, thank you a million times for your hard workl Most respectfully, Ms.lanet M. O'Connell Reflection Lakes Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 1 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) BrownleeMichael From: Senti To; Subject: Janet OConnell <janetocS@yahoo.com> Thursday, June 07, 2018 9:31 AM FialaDonna No Rezoning to benefit Habitat Categories:ATTENTION PRINTED Thank you Commissioner Fiala for Micael's reply. There are a few more serious issues that prove the bullyin8 tactics of Habitat. More children going to the Manatee schools that are already Title Nine and in terrible condition...is the Collier School Board going to build much needed new buildings over on that site? Where is that money going to come from? lt doesn't seem likely that Habitat is going to contribute any money from their S93 million budget to help the Manatee schools I ls the Federa I government Boing to su pply mo re free mea ls, etc for these additio na I ch ild ren? Lely H igh School is also overcrowdedl Now Greenway Road. Naples Reserve closed the use of that road for construction trucks over a year ago. That road is in terrible condition and will need to be redone and improved. Will the County provide money for that since Habitat won't? Also the Coll,er Sherrif does go back into Regal Estates 1 quite often for crime calls. Building a wall with foliage by Habitat that will cost $600,000 out of Habitat's coffers is now NOT a guarantee as you heard the other night from Habitat's Collier President. He made it clear that that would be a lot of money that Habitat may NOT be able to fork out! Well, how much more duping is the Collier County Commission going to stand for? Our communities are NOT BLIGHTED. Habitat normally goes into blighted areas to do some good work. Unfortunately, the improvements in these blighted areas do not last, because the so-called "sweat equity" is not long term. I have seen this in NY and in Broward County, FL As a retired Florida educator on a very limited budget who has worked very hard all of my life and NEVER expected any handout from anyone, this entire "Bill of Goods" smells terrible. We do NOT WANT REZONING TO satisfy any additional building that also has a huge potential for corruption. Florida, where I have lived most of my life, has always had too much corruption by developers, politicians, localgovernments. Collier County was once a safe haven and known for decency. Along with out of control building now in full swing, many of our local leaders are being swept along to satisfy those with the money responsible for Collier's reputation going downhill. This is totally reprehensible. So much corruption destroyed Broward. The lessons are very clear and being ignored now in Collier. ( lwill now fade into the background as many others will also be standinB up.) Respectfully, Janet M. O'Connell sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 1 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) BrownleeMichael From: Sent: Sxbject: Attachmenls Lenore Meurer <lenorem@aol.com> Saturday, June 02, 2018 9:06 PM Habitat for Humanity NIM for more low income housing 6/4/18 attached Habitathornebuyer (1) (1).pdt HFH Regal Acres NIM meeting 642018, adding more low income housing to over concentration in East Naples.pdf Categories:ATTENTION, PRINTED NIM Well of course its scheduled in dead of summer with noone around, in the middle of a rain storm like last year to deter attendance and opposition. No surprises there, this is more low income housing to add to Regal acres out on 41, like we need anymore. I want to require where they are moving from since Cormac insisted at the last AHAC that these people were Naples residents? and from here, though I never knew that we had such a huge Haitian population. Where are they employed, can't look like the past incomplete documents which confirmed noone working in East Naples, not even close' Take a look.. I am submitting my questions, such as how they comply with the statute to avoid overconcentration of low income housing in this target area and do they have that assessment? No bonus housing or any AF housing should be approved without establishing a methodogy for criteria that ensures compliance with the statute. We have 52olo of all Affordable housing in Collier County located right here in East Naples, we know there is no way they comply with the law. Who is responsible to ensure Collier staff comply with the law and apply methodology/ assessment with every development application submitted? Where is the data that proves these areas are not saturated? Do all development applications evaluate the equitable distribution of AF housing? Should they? Obviously no one ts concerned about the big picture since we have such a huge disparity in housing numbers. Will North Naples citizens be concerned about the housing disparity when we implement bussing their children to Avalon, and other East Naples schools? We are deflnitely heading in that direction folksjust like Foft Myers, because its unconstitutionallo not provide a quality education to children in schools having up to gBVo economically disadvantaged attending. This must be repoded at the Federal level and immediately addressed. While Collier staff can continue to ignore the statute regarding overconcentration in low income housing in East Naples, there is no ignoring the LAW. We need to demand enforcement of the law to protect us, our children and our communities. Please attend this NIM and be hear4 ask these critical guestions/ where is the analysis that safeguards our communities? We need the data analysis since we must prevent further over saturation and concentration, Habitat has the Largest Affordable Housing Communities in the WORLD located right here, in little Naples, its what we're known as, 'Habitat County'and they're buying up land out on 41 and everywhere, and we let this happen, we've done nothing to stop it, and we will suffer with the repurcussions of doing nothing, saying nothing... LENORE MEURER I 1 I 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) PRESIDENT Lely I:ndings Of 5outhwest Florida LenoreM@aol.com 239-23L-6236 2 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) NEAI,E MONTCOMERY Dlrccl dnrl (2J9) 3r62lJ -., Erolli: Nqlrul$t8olsE@Eersdrsso PaTffiT LAWFIRM I El, H.ndry Srrc.r, Por( Myors, Plorlds 33901 | P.O. Drrvor 1507, Iort My6B, Florlde 13902-1507 | (2r9) 334-2195 | rlx (239) 312-2243 May 18, 2018 Dear Propoty Owner: - ,- .-.,--Tltalub6AaIitsEdfiatl{-dD"rtar e?C6rjiry-_.: seoking Rezoni'rg approval for the following described propqty: Property located oa the west side of Greenway Road to be accessed via MaJesdc Circle Tho pctitioner is asking the County to approvo an application to amend the Regal Actcs Rosidential Planncd Unit Devclopmcnt by changing tlre zoning classifcation of 23.15+/- acres ofland zoaed Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Aces RPUD. This change will amend the master plan to insludo the additional land and will inorease the pormissible number ofdwelling rmits ftom I 84 to 300. The request includes an affordable housing donsity bonus agrecment for the added 23.15 ac'res that will genetate 46 bonus units for low or moderate income tesidetrts on the described property. In complianco with the Land Development Code requirements, aNeighborhood Information Mecting will bc hcld to provide you ar opportunity to become frrlly aware ofths intended development assooiated with this application. Tho Noighborhood Information Meetiog will be held on Monday, June 4 at 5:30 p.m' at the First Haitian Baptist Church ofNaples located at 14500 Tamiami Trail E, Naples, FL 34114. At this meoting the petitioner will make every offort to illustsate how tho property will bo developed and to aDswer atry questions. Should you have questions prior to the meoting, please me, gilrcerely, NM&ao N 4{32 VINCENNES BLVD. SUEE IOI cArE coMr" FrrrjD 33tO4 (2r9) '42-3 148 1524 CrrN CruJs RoAD, SUrE 203 wEsr P,AI.I{ BE rcII, FLorDA 334 t5 (55 r) {7r-1366 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Brown leeMichael From: Sent: To: Subject: Ronald Wahl <rkwahl98@msn.com> Friday, June 08, 2018 10:05 PM FialaDonna Habitat for Humanity Regal Acres ll Categories:ATTENTION, PRINTED Dear Commissioners: We are very concerned about the consideration of sacrificing preserve land for housing. Preserve land was designated so land would be preserved. We allthought that was an environmental responsibility. WE ARE RESIDENTS OF REFLECTION LAKEs. TAKE A LOOK AT HOW REFLECTION LAKES WAS FORCED TO PRESERVE LAND IN HENDRY COUNTY WHICH IS A HARDSHIP FOR OUR COMMUNIry! WHY WOULD YOU LET HABITAT FOR HUMANITY BUILD REGAL ACRES ON PRESERVE LAND???? Ron and Sheila Wahl 14704 Cranberry Ct. Naples, FL 344114 1 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) B rown leeM ic hael From: Sent: To: Subject: Lynn Livingston <redwingnutl @me.com> Friday, June 08,2018 10:30 ANI FialaDonna RegalAcres ll Categories:ATTENTION, PRINTED My family is strongly opposed to any expansion ofthe Habitat for Humanity development called Regal Acres, which we understand will be called Regal Acres II. The current community called Regal Acres is an eyesore, 800/0 of the communiry has homes that are not maintained and yards that are worse. Some ofthe homes have 3-4 cars in the driveway, even during working hours. These are supposed to be single family homes but obviously have extended families that have moved in, Even now, we can hear the noise and loud partying at night from existing Habitat homes. Teenagers from Regal Acres have been coming along the canal and trespassing on Reflection Lakes private property. We have seen groups of 3-8 teenagers run through our and our neighbors' yards. Having more Habitat homes only 150 feet from the east side of Reflection Lakes will be a horrible eyesore, more noise and possible increase in trespassing. Respectfu lly submitted, Aubrey Livingston 14587 Mancheste)' Dr Naples, FL 34114 1 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) BrownleeMichael From: Sent: To: Subiect Tom Custer <tcuster49@gmaal.com> IMonday, June 11, 2018 7:16 PM FialaDonna HH proposed expansion to RegalAcres Categories ATTENTION, PRINTED Donna, I have received your Tidbits for some time now and understand you have petitioned your other commissioners to appropriately distribute affordable housing developments equally in Collier county and not focus on East and South Naples. I agree whole heartedly with that to maintain proper diversity ln the neighborhoods as being economically sound and essential fo r property values a nd diversification. Mike Yancon, sent you an emailasking for support to defeat the proposed Zoning Change Habitat for Humanity is proposing by expanding the existing Regal Acres to add approximately 118 more homes that wlll be contiguous to Naples Reserve. Many in the surrounding neighborhoods attended the first meeting on iune 4th at the Haitian Church and vehemently opposed it for the reasons noted above. I am Mike Yancon"s neighbor and will be adversely affected by this expansion if approved as well along with many families along the fence line there. What help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.. ,n addition, I have been searching Collier County's websites to find a graphic map that inidicates all the Habitat communities and all other affordable housing communities and how they are populated throughout Naples. This would clearly show all the concentration areas for discussion. Please help with this so we can defer groMh here and relocate to other areas of Naples. Respectfully submitted and look forward to hearing from you soon. I believe the next meeting with the planning commission or zoning board for this request in June 23 or, 24th. Thanks so much - Tom Custer 1 Thonks - Ton c, 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Brown leeMichael From: Sent: To: Subject Meltem Tanner <ems_meltem@hotmail.com> Wednesday, June 13, 2018 12:32 AM SolisAndy; FialaDonnaj SaundersBurt; TaylorPennyi McDanielBill; ems-matt@msn.com Habitat for Humanity Regal Acres ll Categories:PRINTED Hi Dear Commissioners, I am a homeowner at Reflection Lakes, Manchester Dr. We regretfully found out that there would be a possibility to replace the agricultural zone in Regal Acres ll ( off Rt 41 and Greenway Rd ) to a housing project. When we've purchased our property we were assured by Neal Communities that we would have a large preserve in the back of our property that is not buildable. This is the only reason why we purchased our property. Also I believe there should have more green space in our county. I feel it is becoming out of hand when I see ongoing construction all over the place and replacing our beautiful nature with ugly structures. You and other commissioners should plan very well, Please don't let our beautiful community become like any other city. We will seek our rights through legal systems in case of a decision that would destroy our preserve or replace it with housing. It's imperative that you and other commissioners make your decisions responsibly. Thank you [/leltem Tanner 14359 Manchester Drive Naples, FL34114 1 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) BrownleeMichael From: Sent: To: Subiect; Janet OConnell <janetocS@yahoo.com> Wednesday, June 27,2018 5:49 PM FialaDonna Habitat Categories:ATTENTION, PRINTED Hello again Mrs. Fiala....iust an update concerning our most recent meeting last evening (June 26thlwith Habitat's President in our clubhouse per his request. We a8ain faced another very difficult meeting, as Habitat's President considers it a DONE DEAL and that we need to accept it. He had two Xeroxes: one showing a viewpoint of scope/line of elevation from us to their tops of many l,ttle houses; the second was a map in color showing their development and proximity to Reflection Lakes. This upset most of us and his monotonous litany of descriptions, etc. We fired back with many questions and also making it clear that we want NO REZONING AND NO FURTHER BUILDING ENCROACHING ON OUR PRESERVE AND INCLUSIVE THEREOF. HE could have cared less but said maybe he could include a fence. We said A TALL WALL WOULD BE NECESSARY. I brought up the Manatee schools and would Habitat be donating some oftheir S93 Million to help on that and also Greenway Road? He said that he's not concerned about the schools, because according to him there are 16 empty classrooms I When I asked if these were damaged portables, he would not reply. As for Greenway Rd he left that up in the air with us presuming that the County will have to fund that d isastrous road I He said the S93 Million has to be allocated for buying more land behind us for their 184-300 little houses and the mortgages for the ownersl Plus the density will be 5 units per acre. We allfeel very defeated and angry. We hope that the Rezoning will NOT happen and are be8ging the County Commission, Planning Commission, and Zoning to make an intelligent decision to keep our Preserve and disputed tract of land Agricultural. Again and again,..The building MUST STOP. Please share with your colleagues. Most respectfully, Ms.ianet O'Connell ( retired Broward County educator) Reflection Lakes Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 1 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 14534 Manchester Drive Naples Florida 34114 Jute 27 ,2O18 Collier Counry Commissioners and Planning Commission Liaison Glowth Managem€nt Dept. / Zoning Ser.vices Section 2800 Nolth Horseshoe Dfive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi, Mr'. Cohen, Mr. Bellows, Ms. Fiala, Mr. Solis, Mr. Saunderc, Ms. Taylot, Mt'. McDaaiel, Mr. Mark Strain: Our community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Humaniry rcplesentatives last evening, |tne26,2018 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to teach agleement to stop the rezoning or facilitate compromise via additional building plan modifications to rcduce noise and privacy to those residents boldering the presele area separating bolh developments. Increased housing lrom 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and opportunity fo)'trespassing to our quiet rctirement neighborhood. This was the second meeting and this the second letter Reflection Lakes homeowners have voiced their concerns, As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have ah'eady occurred with teenagels infi'inging on Manchester Drive plopefiies that abut this pt'eserve' Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments fot more ttansient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes not only paid larger premium fees for lots tllat rvele to border permanent woodland, btt stand to suffer damage or injury to theil property which detogates fi'om theit reasonable use and pleasure, Rezoning compromises what now plovides privacy and secut iqr; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. As discussed with Habitat at the meeting, we strongly advocate for the DENIAL OF RLZONING. In the event you refuse Io suppolt out' community, we expect the following at Habitat's expense: l. No less ahan an eight-foot solid wall between developments to block noise and trespass. 2. Move the playground and basketball couft closer to Greenway Road from current planned location 3. Do not consnuct 22 Habitat homes closest to the prcserue thus mainlaining the preserve's trees and allowing room for a ban ier wall on Habitat's prope$y. 4. Considet the financial impact ofupgrading roads leading to these Habitat hornes as current conditions threateu optimal access by emetgency personnel and vehicles. Sincerely RoberlJ. and Vicki L. Smith 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) BrownleeMic hael From; Sent: To: Su bject: Ashley Kennedy <ashinosh@icloud.com> Thursday, June 28, 2018 '10:16 AM FialaDonna Goncern from Reflection Lakes Categories:PRINTED I4717 Sonoma Blvd. Naples Florida 341l4 June 28,2018 Collier County Commissioners and Planning Commission Liaison GroMh Managem€nl Dept. / ZoninS Sel1ices Section 2800 Noflh Horseshoc Drive Napleq FL 34104 Dear Ms- fiala, Ou. community gathered for a rneeting with Habilat for Humanily rcpresentatives last evening, June 26, 2018 in Reflection Lak€s. Thc Boal was to r€ach agreement lo stop lhe rezoning or facilitat€ compromise via additional building plan modificalions to rtducc noise aod pdvacy to thosc residents bordering the pr€serve area separaiing both developments. Increased housing fiom | 84 to 300 units will only increase noise and opponunity for lrcspassing to our quiet relirem€nt nei ghbodlood. This was the second meering and this the second lerter Reflection Lakes homeo\rners have voiced thcir concerns. As homeowners, $r'e forEsee inevitable security issues since several incidents hove already occurred with t€enagers infiinging on Manchester Drive prcperties tial abut this preserve. Destaoying firther $,oodla[ds only opens bolh our dev€lopments lor mor! tlansient trespassing aod risk. Neighbors locat€d on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lak€s nol only paid larSer premium Gcs for lots tha( were to border pcrmanent woodland, but stand lo su(IcI danage or injury to theiJ property rvhich derogates liom lheir reasonable use and pleasure. Rezonin8 compromises what now providcs ptivacy and security; the cxtensive qoodland area lh6t insures distance bet*€en developments. As discussed with Habit t st the meeting, \r€ strongly advocatc for the DENIAL Of R-EZONING. ln rhe event you refirse to suppon ou. community, we €xpecl the following al Habitat's expeme: L No less than an eight-fooi solid wall behveen developmenls to block noise and trespass.2. Move l[e playgaound and basketball court closer to Creenlvay Road lrom currcnt plonned location3. Do not construcl22 Habit6{ homes closest to fie prcserve lhus maintaining the preserve's trees and allowing room lor a banier\ynllon Habitst's property. 4. Consider the financial impact ofupg:ading roads leading lo these Habital homes as curcnt conditions thftaten optimalacc€ss by emergency personnel and lehicles. Sincerely, Ashley Allison Kennedy 1 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) SaboJa mes From: Sent: To: Subject: BellowsRay Thursday, June 28, 2018 1 1:33 AM SaboJames FW: Regal ll Pa,l FYI Roymond V. Bellows, Zoning Monoger Zoning Division - Zoning Services Seclion Growlh Monogemenl Deporlment Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fox: 239.252.6350 Cottyt Ly Exceedi n E ex ped t a t i o ns, e ve ryd ay ! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Divislon Suryey at https://ooo.ol/exivqT From: Office Manager Imailto:officemgr@kamconcrete.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28,207811.:12 AM To: Stra inMa rk <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; Fiala Donna <Donna. Fiala @colliercountyfl.gov>; SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; Sa undersBurt <Burt.Sa unders@colliercountyfl.gov>; TaylorPenny <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov>; McDa nielgill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Regal ll 1 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) S*,,s*orahu el ue" Naples Florida 341l4 June 27. 2018 Collier Counry Commissioners and Planning Commission L Crowth Management Dept. I Znning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Napleq FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi. Mr. Cohen, Mr. Bellows. Ms. Fiala" Mr. Soli McDaniel. Mr. Mark Strain: Our community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Hur June 26, 201 8 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to reach ag ,Acilitate compromise via additional building plan modificat those residents bordering the preserve area separating both <j 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and oppo*unity for neighborhood. This was the second meeting and this the second letter Refle their concerns. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable secur already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester D Desroying funher woodlands only opens both our developn and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester I paid larger premium fees for lots that were to border permar damage or injury to their property which derogates from the Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and sect insures distance between developments. 2 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Blassings, Sue Thomos 863-223-5176 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. lf you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. lnstead, contact this office by telephone or in writlng. 3 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) SaboJames From: Sent: To: Subject: BellowsRay Thursday, June 28. 2018 1 '1 :36 AM Sabolames FW: Concern from Reflection Lakes Raq FYI Roymond V. Bellows, Zoning Monoger Zoning Division - Zoning Services Seclion Growth Monogemenl Deportmenl Telephone: 239 .252.2463: F ox: 239.252.6350 Er ceed i n g exped ta t io ns, eve ryday ! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey al httos://qoo.ql/eXivqT From: Ashley Kennedy Imailto:ashinosh@icloud.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28,2018 10:14 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Concern from Reflection Lakes l4? l7 Sonoma Blvd. Naples Florida 34114 June 28, 2018 Collier County Commissioners and Planning Commission Liaison Growth Management Depl. / Zoning Services Section 2800 Nonh Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bellows. Our community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Humanity representatives last evening, June 26, 2018 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to reach agreemenl to stop the rezoning or facilitate comprcmise via addilional building plan modifications to reduce noise and privacy to those residents bordering the preserve area separating both developments. Increased housing from 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and opportunity for trespassing to our quiet retirement neighborhood. This was the second meeting and lhis the second letter Reflection Lakes homeowners have voiced their concems. As homeowne$, we foresec inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers inlringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and isk. Neighbors located on the east side ofManchester Drive in Refleclion Lakes not only paid larger premium f€es for lots lhal were to border permanenl woodland, but stand to suffer damage or injury to their prop€rty which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance belween developments- As discussed with Habitat at the meeting, we strcngly advocate for the DENIAL OF REZONING. In the event you refuse to support our communiry, we expect the following at Habital's o(pense: l. No l€ss than an eight-foot solid wall between dev€lopments to block noise and lrespass.2. Move the playground and basketball court closer to Greenway Road from current planned location C&ffi. Crn'rr,v -.-/.\-,_.L#\#-r:- 1 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Sincerely, l. Do not conslrucl 22 Habilal homes closest to the presene thus maintaining the preserve's trees and allowing room for a barricr wall on Habitats property. 4. Consider the financial impact ofupgrading roads leading to these Habitat homes as current conditions threaten optimal access by emergency personnel and vehicles. Ashley Allison Kennedy Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. lf you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail lo this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) l"t,*y' t/.t t,"/,\ lLl\77 6 ttt.,t , t< Dl} Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head GroMh Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Our communif recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classifi cation of 23.25+l- acres ofland zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units fiom 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate-income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concems at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners fiom weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infiinging on Manchester Drive properties that abut this pres€rve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low-moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to tie job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April-2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 4l south. Although school overflow / eduoation issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their propety which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely ,fo,r tA Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) L- rq-rs V"-"t /s OAA Naples Flrida 341 14 Jme t,20lt estee Dq MiclaelBciDirso Ihaadas Cohco, Doft ILad Goudt MrolgcmcdDcpt /Zming Scrvies Scctio 2t00 North I{uscshoc Driw Nples,FL34l(X Dear Mr. B6i ad Ivfr. Cohen: o.r community recedy rcccired notificti<n ua infunaim regadlng rrrbitrt fu H.mmity's SS amlicdm- ,. qplixirn ineods to amcod 6c Rcgd-Acrcs-Rcsilemial pf-r.A ifritDat€lopmcd by r@ing tho cb.sificdbn of 232trl- ues oiUra -U n rrl eO*fmf--(A)P thc Rcgd Acr€s RPUD. This incrcases lrorsing unis Aom l& Ofm, epn61:;ngi fi-sitrgbfuily rmits fu.low or morterrro-irrconre rcsilcns m tbc descdbed Fd"fr,,. Thl - - oganslm inmgcs o a naral hobiE&rcstnc fc dc€r hcrds, bcds od;ort thc I'Iahs Rcs.rE ad Rsoedi@ l-Ls hmeowne'* voirpd ricir wns d two mcetings.It€ thi"g ofHrbiE / Neal }Io4mcry's infcnutinat meaiag ryeaEd stegicEtyorgmiud to exchde eeasorur [66661psrs arm weighing h * oi"'.im".,"ov. -A"-' hmcoumers, *e forese inevitrtte scrrlty ;"*'o enc. ir""at focidc* 5grc il€ady occunedwie eeoagE*ftftindng o lrraocheg Drive Fqerties rt* abm this reserrc. Moi Ece"d"-ncing cas, mise, adtshpolhrtion roquircd ndirtcdio o alh-Ud ------'--r-sr' -.Fr{ }&pl€s qn*dy hes a orrerahdmce of bwaoderre horsing (4 lllbitil villeg6) aodlimited opportmities fu rrEkilLd hbo.- It od dlte l@,- fucmc uaie ae oocfrcr€ # O A"job nutet (www.easnahsoivic-@re_NeffikrEr.pdf). Higffiity housiry crtts chelleoges fu the lrrme schoor since a ner ho.singdevehryot will bceir Eighbc x,cst of 4l soe Alrtogh sdoor orcrom l <ic-tro urcsaetoublirycdre isa&o rfrcaoras rc ooo..+e.i636 iitert" lqulalymureet".*.Oescrying ffier vioodhds oly opcos tm oir aevelopeats fu ;re ;ad"d *+""_fogmd ris&- Neighbas located m lbe ea$ side ofMuchc$cr Drive in Redoctim I -r.es turd b gffit dgnegE o iqiuy toeir pqerty wtioh deroges fim thrr reesoable use md pk**-neoninq compronises *tc now povirks prio"y -a .**itx te oceosi,e woodlad .*. o*in$rcs dimce betcIeq devEtopo€G. We *mglyldt/ocrE fatb deaial of@iag23 urs ofagrirrltral hdrh*ehnNpbsRcservc md Reflectin r rhs. IZu'L{Xih 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) ?Ut^* \(k-ti"e ia""uoa ih 5S"' Lawiel- Qor^l $d1kD' fL ZV n\ Naples Florida 341 14 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34lM Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classific ation of 23.25+l- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPIID. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating I 16 single-family units for low or moderate-income residents on the described property. This expansion infiinges on a natual habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concems at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low-moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most ofthe low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com./newsletter/ENCA_April 2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be lheir neighbor west of4l south. Although school overflow / education issues are troublilg, crime is also a factor as 'we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors lo€ated on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogales from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoningZ3 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) L- /q -/e R/2 //,l. €r<)a Naples Florida 341 l4 June 8. 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land mned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate-income residents on the described property. This expansion in{iinges on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concems at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners ffom weighing in on this controversy. As homeovmers, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidens have already occurred with teenagers infiinging on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples cunently has an overabundance of low-moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April-2016*Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be thet neighbor west of 4 I south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side ofManchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates liom their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance betwe€n developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of remning23 acres ofagricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerelv ,t Z-2"--/--, 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) \a es on da 34114 .lune 8.2018 Michacl Bosi- Dircctor Thaddcus Cohcn. Dcpt. Head Growth },lanagement Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 Nonh Horseshoe Drive Naplcs. FL -i.1104 Dear N'lr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen Our communify rccently rcceived notification and infomration rcgarding I labitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend thc Rcgal Acrcs Residenttal Planncd Unit Development by rezoning the classitication of23.25+i- acres ofland zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating I l6 singlc-family units for low or moderatc-income rcsidents on thc dcscribed propcay. This expansion infringcs on a natural habitavpresen'c for dcer herds, bears and coyotes. Thc Naples Rcserve and Rcflcction Lakcs homeotvncrs voiced thcir concems ar lwo ntectings. Thc timing of Habitat l Ncal Montgomcry's informatiorral meeting appearcd strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners tiom weighing in on this controversy. As homeownen, we tbresee inevitable sectrity issues since several incidents have already <rccurred rvith teenagcrs infiinging on Manchestcr Drive propcrrics rhar abut this preserve. Most rcccntly. racing cars. noisc, and trash pollution requircd notification to authorities. East Naplcs currently has an overabundancc of low-modcratc housing (4 Habitat villagcs) and lirnitcd opportunitics for unskillcd labor. Most ofthe low- inconre units are nowhcrc clos€ to the job market (wwu.eastnaplescivic.conVnewsletter/ENCA_April_2016_Newsletter.pdl). High-density housing creates challengcs for the Manatec School sincc a ncw housing do'elopment will be their neighbor west of4l south. Although school overflow 1 education issues are troirbling, crime is also a factor as we now expericncc incidents regularll,on weekends. Destroying furthcr woodlands only opens bolh our developmcrts tbr more transicnt trcspassing and risk. Neighbors located on tlre easl side of Manchester f)rive in Reflection Lakes sland to sut'ler damagc or injury to lhcir property u'hich derogates from their reasonablc usc and pleasure. Rezoning compromiscs what now provides privacy and sccurity: the extcnsivc woodland area that insures distance betwecn developments. We strongly advocatc for the denial ofrczoning 23 acres ofagricultural land that abur Naples Rescn e and Reflection Lakes. Sincerclv 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) BrownleeMichael From: Sent: To: Subject: Kim Pojeta 2 <pojetabodrl@gmail.com> Monday, June 04, 2018 7:27 PM FialaDonna tonight meeting at the church on Regal Acres Categories:PRINTED First thank you for attending. And secondly, I apologize for handing the mike back when I finished my question. But I asked if Habitat looks at affordable housing as a whole throughout the county by district prior to choosing a location to build since Collier residents work all over the county too. The response wasabout land value/cost. lsuggested they consider looking at all affordable housing locations including existing value properties that can be bought by district before determining where need is..... and lookint at land in areas that lack affordable housing even though the bottom dollar of the product may be higher because commuting 45 minutes to work or more is tough too. I also realized after I left that looking by district and by build-able amounts ofdistrict could be valuable too. Thanks again for attending and for your support, Kim I 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Brown leeMichael From: Sent: To: Subject: Janet OConnell <janetocS@yahoo.com> Tuesday, June 05, 2018 9:59 AM FialaDonna Habitat on our Preserve Zoned Agricultural Categories:ATTENTION, PRINTED Hello again Mrs. Fia la...l have been one of your very loyal supporters ever since I moved here from Broward County in 2004. Thank you for talking to me as you were leaving the meeting last night. More people spoke after you left, including a nother RL owner who expressed her disgust especially at that nasty female lawye r. ldon't know ifyou noticed that she did interrupt me and reached out to take the microphone away from me ! I told her that I had every right to speak. lt sounds like Habitat considers this a DONE DEAL, since the other Commissioners will Sive them the Rezoning! lt's even much worse than the approval of the recent storage facility across from Naples Reserve Blvd entrancel I said what I did last night because I watched Broward County get over-developed over my 30 plus years over there. The end result in Broward is terrible...traffic a total nightmare, high crime, disgusting density, and even Lighthouse point where I had a cute condo looks old and crappy. Coral Springs is now also horrific. I'm sure my prediction for Naples is correct if the County leaders continue to sell off to the developers including Habitat. lt doesn't surprise me what you said about your trying to get a few decent stores out this way. Look at Freedom Square and the blight there! The old Kmart building remains a huge problem. Even Dollar Tree is moving into a much needed new location behind the 5th/3rd Bank across 41! You have tried so hard but your colleagues don't care. PLEASE STAND UP To THEM AND TRy TO STOP THE REZON|NGI Yes, Habitat does much good but to listen to their slick presentation along with their horrible lawyer was so AWFLlL. They even have land down by the Links! Habitat in Broward has built disgusting homes that are NOT maintained. So, it looks like Collier County could be renamed Broward County West in the near future! Horror. ls this what our Commission wants? We the People and owners with our lifetime investments sunk into Collier County do NOT. l'm guessing what l'm saying here will not make a difference, a very hard pil! for me to swallow as a retired FL educator. Most Respectfully, Janet M. o'connell 14160 Winchester Ct. #1801 Naples, FL 34114 Reflection Lakes sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 1 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 7ZL/s7 OR Naples Florida 341l4 June 8,2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amcnd the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Developmenl by rezoning the classific ation of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to lhe Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating I l6 single-family units for low or moderate-income residents on the described property. This expansion infiinges on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concems at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational neeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occuned with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low-moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com./newsletter/ENCA_April-2016_Newsletter.pd0. High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing der,clopment will be their neighbcr u,est of4l south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side ofManchesler Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury Io their property which derogates fiom lheir reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial ofrezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely kt4vue E- S-t o s slrs /r a /1'/77 /'/?n/LC/tEP /*7 dw 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) hNaples34t r June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Coheru Dept, Head Growth Management Dept / Zoning Services Section 2E00 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning tfie classification of23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 3@, generating I 16 single-family units for low or moderate-income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection l,akes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infiinging on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples cunently has an overabundance of low-moderate housing (4 Habit* villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to lhe job market (www.easfiraplescivic.corr/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016_Newsleter.pd|. High{ensity housing creates challenges for the Manaee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of4l south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling crime is also a faclor as we now experi€,nce incidents regularly on weekends. Destoying further woodlands only opem both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors locared on the ecst side ofMancheser fhive in Reflection lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates fom their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that inswes distalce between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sinc.erely Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr- Cohen: k,,24 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) Kevin and Dawn Chard 14546 Laruer Court Naples Florida 341 14 June 29, 2018 Collier County Commissioners and Planrung Commission Liaison Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Bellows, Ms. Fiala, Mr. Solis, Mr. Saunders, Ms. Taylor, Mr McDaniel, Mr. Mark Strain: Our community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Humanity representatives on June 26, 2018 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to reach agreement to stop the rezoning or facilitate compromise via additional building plan modifications to reduce noise and privacy to those residents bordering the preserve area separating both developments. lncreased housing from 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and opportunity for trespassing to our quiet retirement neighborhood. This was the second meeting and this the second letter Reflection Lakes homeowners have voiced their concems. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes not only paid larger premium fees for lots that were to border permanent woodland, but stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. As discussed with Habitat at the meeting, we strongly advocate for the DENIAL OF REZONING. In the event you refuse to support our community, we expect the following at Habitat's expense: 1. No less than an eight-foot solid wall between developments to block noise and trespass. 2. Move the playground and basketball court closer to Greenway Road from current planned location 3. Do not construct 22 Habitat homes closest to the preserve thus maintaining the preserye's trees and allowing room for a barrier wall on Habitat's property. 4. Consider the financial impact of upgrading roads leadfurg to these Habitat homes as current conditions threaten optimal access by emergency personnel and vehicles. Sincerely, Dawn and Kevin Chard 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Attach E. Correspondence from the public (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Public Correspondence (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Public Correspondence (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Public Correspondence (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Public Correspondence (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Authorization regarding lake interconnection (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres) REGAL ACRES II RPUD (PL20170001733) Application and Supporting Documents September 6, 2018 CCPC Hearing Prepared August 15, 2018 by: Post Office Box 1550 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, Florida 33902-1550 (239) 334-0046 E B 642 2350 Stanford Court ŶNaples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 Ŷ Fax (239) 434-9320 SINCE 1946 October30,2017 NancyGundlach,ZoningServices GrowthManagementDepartment 2800NorthHorseshoeDrive Naples,FL34104 Subject:RegalAcresIIRPUD PUDRezoneApplication PL20170001733 DearMs.Gundlach: Onbehalfofourclient,HabitatforHumanityofCollierCounty,pleasefindtheenclosedPUD Rezone(PUDZ)Applicationfortheabovereferencedproject.Theapplicantisrequestingazoning changefromtheRuralAgricultural(A)andResidentialPlannedUnitDevelopment(RPUD)zoning districtstoaResidentialPlannedUnitDevelopment(RPUD)zoningdistrictfortheprojecttobe knownastheRegalAcresIIRPUD,toaddlandstotheexistingRPUDforamaximumof116 additionalresidentialunitson23.15acresofproperty;and,considerationandapprovalofan affordablehousingdensitybonusagreementauthorizingthedevelopertoutilizeaffordable housingbonusdensityunitsinthedevelopmentofthisprojectlocatedonthewestsideof GreenwayRoad,eastofCollierBoulevard(C.R.951),andnorthofU.S.41,inSection12, Township51South,Range26East,CollierCounty,Florida;andprovidingforrepealofOrdinance No.05Ͳ36. PleasenotethatthePreͲApplicationMeetingindicated23.84acres,witharequestfor5unitsper acre,resultingin119units.However,perdetailedsurveyinginformation,theacreageisspecified inthisRPUDapplicationas23.15acres,witharequestfor5unitsperacres,resultingin116units. Thefollowinginformationisincludedforreviewandapproval: 1.One(1)checkintheamountof$16,125forthePUDRezoneApplicationfee,Comprehensive PlanningConsistencyReviewfee,EnvironmentalDataRequirementsͲEISPacketfee, TransportationMajorStudyReviewandLegalAdvertisingfees.Aseparate$500checkfor theTransportationMethodologyMeetingisalsoprovided. 2.CertificateofAffordableHousingExpeditedFastTrackReview 3.AffordableHousingBonusDensityAgreementinStrikeͲthruFormat 4.PUDRezoneApplication 5.Attachment1ͲListIdentifyingOwnership(DisclosureofInterest) 6.Attachment2ͲParcelList 7.PreͲApplicationMeetingNotes 8.AffidavitofAuthorization,signedandnotarized 9.CovenantofUnifiedControl,signedandnotarized 10.CompletedAddressingChecklist 11.WarrantyDeeds 12.BoundarySurvey,signedandsealed 13.CurrentAerialPhotographwithFLUCFCSCodes(includedinEnvironmentalDataReport) 14.EvaluationCriteriaNarrative 15.EnvironmentalDataReport 16.ProtectedSpeciesSurvey(includedinEnvironmentalDataReport) 17.TrafficImpactStudy 18.SchoolImpactAnalysisApplication 19.ListofPermittedandConditionalUses(ExhibitA) 20.ResidentialDevelopmentStandards(ExhibitB) 21.PUDMasterPlan(ExhibitC) 22.LegalDescription(ExhibitD) 23.ListofDeviationsandJustifications(ExhibitE) 24.ListofDevelopmentCommitments(ExhibitF) 25.OriginalPUDOrdinanceandMasterPlan 26.RevisedOriginalPUDDocumentwithStrikeͲthru,notingitisproposedforrepeal Welookforwardtoworkingwithyouandappreciateyourcoordinationofthisrezoningapplication throughthereviewandpublichearingprocess.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsorrequirefurther information,pleasecontactmeat(239)280Ͳ4331. Sincerely, LauraDeJohn,AICP DirectorofPlanning&LandscapeArchitecture JohnsonEngineering,Inc. 20170078Ͳ000 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 1 of 16 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: __________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. To be completed by staff Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples FL 34113 (239) 775-0036 (239) 775-0477 nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org Laura DeJohn, AICP Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers FL 33901 (239) 334-0046 (239) 229-1726 (239) 334-3661 ldejohn@johnsoneng.com COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 2 of 16 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Please complete the following information, if space is inadequate use additional sheets and attach to the completed application packet. a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c.If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership See Attachment 1. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 3 of 16 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: _________________ h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Date subject property acquired _ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ GHU, LLC parcel #00737720006 under contract for purchase by Habitat for Humanity, Inc. See Attachment 1. See Attachment 2. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 4 of 16 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to the ________________________________ zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________ Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________ Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: x If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; x The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and x The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use Other: ________________ ƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŝƐƉůĂƚƚĞĚĂƐZĞŐĂůĐƌĞƐ ^ƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶĂŶĚZĞŐĂůĐƌĞƐWŚĂƐĞKŶĞZĞƉůĂƚ͘ ϰϵ ϱϰ ϴϳͲϵϬ ϰϴͲϱϬ Property I.D. Number: __ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ__ ƌĞƉůĂƚ ϬϬϳϯϳϳϮϬϬϬϲ͕ϬϬϳϰϭϭϬϬϭϬϰ͕ ϬϬϳϯϳϳϲϬϬϬϴ͕ϬϬϳϰϭϬϴϬϲϬϲ͕ϬϬϳϯϴϮϴϬϬϬϴ Rural Agricultural (A) & RPUD RPUD Vacant/Existing Regal I Residential Neighborhood Residential Regal Acres 05-36 12 51S 26E See Exhibit D for the legal description for existing Regal Acres and proposed addition. 1,298 avg. 2,009 avg.2,609,244 59.9 acres On the west side of Greenway Road, approximately 0.85 miles north of US 41. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 5 of 16 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ RPUD & A Residential & Vacant/Mobile Home/Single Family MH & A Mobile Home/Single Family/Mobile Home A/RFMUO-Receiving Overlay Agriculture & Single Family PUD & MH Residential (Preserve) & Mobile Home West Wind Estates Condo Association 301 Joseph Lane Naples FL 34114 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 6 of 16 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 7 of 16 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will not receive further processing and an application “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”. Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. No. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 8 of 16 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ KŶůLJĂƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŝƐƉůĂƚƚĞĚ͘ ϬϬϳϯϳϳϮϬϬϬϲ͕ϬϬϳϰϭϭϬϬϭϬϰ͕ ϬϬϳϯϳϳϲϬϬϬϴ͕ϬϬϳϰϭϬϴϬϲϬϲ͕ϬϬϳϯϴϮϴϬϬϬϴ Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples FL 34113 (239) 775-0036 (239) 775-0477 nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org Naples FL 34114 12 51 26 See Exhibit D. 116 dwelling units 118 GPM 41,412 GPD 78 GPM 27,608 GPD August 2019 ✔ ✔ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 9 of 16 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. N/A Acknowledged. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 10 of 16 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for ______________ planned unit development (______________PUD) zoning. We hereby designate___________________, legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Owner Owner ____________________________________ ___________________________________ Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this day of , 201__ by ____________________ who is personally known to me or has produced _____________________________ as identification. ____________________________________ Notary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 11 of 16 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed Application with required attachments Pre-application meeting notes Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 2 Completed Addressing Checklist 2 Warranty Deed(s) 3 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 2 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 5 Statement of Utility Provisions 4 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 4 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 4 Traffic Impact Study 7 Historical Survey 4 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 2 Electronic copy of all required documents 2 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if Amending the PUD Checklist continued onto next page… y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 12 of 16 Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 y ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252- 6358 3/17/2017 Page 14 of 16 EXHIBIT A (To be completed in a separate document and attached to the application packet.) PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. ____________________________________________ Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: 1. ___________________________________________ Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: CONDITIONAL USES (Optional) 1. ___________________________________________ DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Table ____________ below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the (type of PUD) PUD Residential Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. 3/17/2017 Page 15 of 16 EXHIBIT B (To be completed in a separate document and attached to the application packet.) TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED & TOWNHOUSE TWO-FAMILY, PATIO & ZERO LOT LINE MULTI- FAMILY CLUBHOUSE/ RECREATION BUILDINGS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA S.F. PER UNIT S.F. PER UNIT S.F. PER UNIT S.F. PER UNIT S.F. PER UNIT MINIMUM LOT WIDTH FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA S.F S.F S.F S.F./D.U. N/A MIN FRONT YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN SIDE YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN REAR YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN PRESERVE SETBACK FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES FEET FEET FEET FEET or BH, whichever is greater N/A MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET SIDE FEET FEET FEET FEET BH REAR FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET PRESERVE SETBACK FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET DISTANCE BETWEEN PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED SPS SPS SPS or FEET FEET S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structures BH = Building Height Footnotes as needed 3/17/2017 Page 16 of 16 GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners’ association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Setback may be either _________ feet (________) on one side or _________ feet (________) on the other side in order to provide a minimum separation between principal structures of _______ feet (________). Alternatively, if the ________ foot (________) setback option is not utilized, then the minimum setback shall not be less than ________ feet (________) and the combined setback between principal structures shall be at least _______ feet (________). At the time of the application for subdivision plat approval for each tract, a lot layout depicting minimum yard setbacks and the building footprint shall be submitted. TABLE II DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA Sq. Ft. N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH _______Ft. N/A MINIMUM YARDS (External) From Immokalee Road Canal ROW _______Ft. SPS From Future Extension of Collier Blvd. _______Ft. SPS From Western Project Boundary _______Ft. _______Ft. MINIMUM YARDS (Internal) Internal Drives/ROW _______Ft. _______Ft. Rear _______Ft. _______Ft. Side _______Ft. _______Ft. MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES Ft. or sum of Building heights * _______Ft. MAXIMUM HEIGHT Retail Buildings _______Ft. _______Ft. Office Buildings _______Ft. _______Ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA _______Sq. Ft. ** N/A MAX. GROSS LEASABLE AREA _______Sq. Ft. N/A * Whichever is greater ** Per principal structure, on the finished first floor. RegalAcresRPUDͲListofOwnershipandCorporationParties January2018Page1of1 ATTACHMENT1 REGALACRESRPUD ListofOwnershipandCorporationParties forHabitatforHumanityofCollierCounty,Inc. PercentageofOwnership HabitatforHumanityofCollierCounty,Inc.100%ofFolio#s 00737760008 00741080606 00738280008 00741100104 SeeattachedSunBizreportforregisteredagent/officerdetails. Department of State /Division of Corporations /Search Records /Detail By Document Number / Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Last Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date Detail by Entity Name Florida Not For Profit Corporation HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. Filing Information 742136 59-1834379 03/20/1978 FL ACTIVE AMENDMENT 11/05/1999 NONE Principal Address 11145 TAMIAMI TRAL EAST NAPLES, FL 34113 Changed: 03/09/2005 Mailing Address 11145 TAMIAMI TRAL EAST NAPLES, FL 34113 Changed: 03/09/2005 Registered Agent Name & Address Cunningham, John 841 Partridge Ct MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Name Changed: 02/03/2017 Address Changed: 02/03/2017 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title S MUELLER, MICHAEL 1109 STRAWBERRY COURT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 DIVISION OF CORPORATIONSFlorida Department of State Page 1 of 3Detail by Entity Name 10/25/2017http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... Title VC SWIHART, STANARD MD 789 REGENCY RESERVE CIR APT 4603 NAPLES, FL 34119 Title Chairman of the Board CUNNINGHAM, JOHN W 841 PARTRIDGE CT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Title CEO LEFKOW, LISA REV. 1490 NOTTINGHAM DR NAPLES, FL 34109 Title President KOULOHERAS, NICK 6130 CYPRESS HOLLOW WAY NAPLES, FL 34109 Title VC Hubbard, Edward 785 Cocobay Drive Naples, FL 34108 Title VC Jilk, Craig 4101 Gulf Shore Blvd N 105 Naples, FL 34103 Title VC Peterson, Doug 849 Swan Dr. Marco Island, FL 34145 Title Treasurer Deal, Rick 2495 Rue Du Jardin Unit 402 Naples, FL 34105 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date Page 2 of 3Detail by Entity Name 10/25/2017http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 2016 02/01/2016 2017 02/03/2017 2017 08/29/2017 Document Images 08/29/2017 -- AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/03/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/01/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/12/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/25/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/22/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/25/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/25/2011 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/05/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/23/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/26/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/08/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/25/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/09/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/20/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/02/2003 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/04/2002 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/06/2001 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/06/2000 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/05/1999 -- Amendment View image in PDF format 03/11/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/04/1998 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/26/1997 -- Name Change View image in PDF format 01/31/1997 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/24/1996 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations Page 3 of 3Detail by Entity Name 10/25/2017http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... August 2018 ATTACHMENT 2 REGAL ACRES RPUD Date Property Acquired and Warranty Deeds 2350 Stanford Court ■Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 ■ Fax (239) 434-9320 SINCE 1946 The attached Warranty Deed dated June 28, 2018 documents the transaction of the parcel identified as Folio #00737720006. In the initial application for the referenced rezone (PL20170001733) this parcel was indicated as under contract for purchase by Habitat for Humanity, Inc. Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. is now the owner. Please include this deed as part of your file, replacing the previous owner information and prior deed for this parcel. We will also include this deed in the applicant’s backup material for the CCPC. TO: James Sabo, AICP DATE: August 6, 2018 FROM: Laura DeJohn, AICP RE: PL20170001733 - Regal Acres RPUD Deed dated 6/28/18 WarrantyDeeds ExistingRegalI OriginalFolio#s00740760008,00740480003,00737400009 WarrantyDeeds Folio#s00737760008,00741080606,00738280008,00741100104 $ 550,000 $ 268,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 79,050 $ 0 $ 79,050 $ 9,486 $ 69,564 $ 0 $ 0 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00737760008 Site Adr. Name / Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E City NAPLES State FL Zip 34113-7753 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 6B12 000100 012 6B12 12 51 26 5.27 Legal 12 51 26 W1/2 OF E1/2 OF E1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS N 30 FT Millage Area 25 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 70 - VACANT INSTITUTIONAL 5.245 6.258 11.503 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 01/04/06 3959-3581 01/25/05 3921-645 11/16/00 2744-746 05/01/68 273-547 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 8/5/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=757462977&ccpaver=1707221124&Fol... $ 15,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,775 $ 0 $ 8,775 $ 8,775 $ 8,775 $ 8,775 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00738280008 Site Adr. Name / Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CC INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST City NAPLES State FL Zip 34113 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 6B12 000100 022 6B12 12 51 26 1.35 Legal 12 51 26 N1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 1.35 AC OR 875 PG 445 Millage Area 25 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 07/20/17 5418-840 07/20/17 5418-838 06/29/09 4467-1397 07/01/80 875-445 11/01/73 564-645 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 10/25/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... $ 500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 100 $ 0 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00741100104 Site Adr. Name / Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRAIL E City NAPLES State FL Zip 34113 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 6B12 000100 1006B12 12 51 26 1.4 Legal 12 51 26 E 1018.64FT OF N 30FT OF NW 1/4 OF NE1/4 Millage Area 25 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 10/18/17 5441-1853 10/18/17 5441-1850 04/19/68 270-867 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 10/25/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... RegalAcresIIRPUDͲLegalDescription August2017Page1of3 REGALACRESIIRPUD EXHIBITD LegalDescriptionforExistingRegalAcresPUD DESCRIPTION (PROPERTYDESCRIBEDINOFFICIALRECORDSBOOK3472,PAGE2450) THESOUTH1/2OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4ANDTHESOUTH1/2OFTHESOUTH 1/2OFTHENORTH1/2OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4,LESSTHEEAST30FEET THEREOF,SECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,COLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA. (ANDALSOINCLUDINGPROPERTIESDESCRIBEDINOFFICIALRECORDSBOOK3812,PAGE1158) PARCEL1: COMMENCINGATTHESOUTHEASTCORNEROFSECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST, COLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA,THENCEALONGTHEEASTLINEOFSAIDSECTION12,NORTH00°11'20" EAST,2743.15FEETTOTHEEAST1/4CORNEROFSAIDSECTION12;THENCECONTINUEALONGSAID EASTLINEOFSECTION12,NORTH00°27'50"EAST,894.35FEET;THENCENORTH89°56'55"WEST, 443.00FEETFORAPLACEOFBEGINNING;THENCENORTH89°56'55"WEST,475.53FEET;THENCE NORTH00°34'06"EAST,490.97FEET;THENCESOUTH89°56'55"EAST,474.64FEET;THENCESOUTH 00°27'50"WEST,490.97FEETTOTHEPLACEOFBEGINNING;BEINGINTHESOUTHEAST1/4OFTHE NORTHEAST1/4OFSECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,COLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA. PARCEL2: COMMENCINGATTHESOUTHEASTCORNEROFSECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST, COLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA,THENCEALONGTHEEASTLINEOFSAIDSECTION12,NORTH00°11'20" EAST,2743.15FEETTOTHEEAST1/4CORNEROFSAIDSECTION12;THENCECONTINUEALONGSAID EASTLINEOFSECTION12,NORTH00°27'50"EAST,894.35FEETTOASETTACK;THENCERUNNORTH 89°56'55"WESTFOR918.53FEETTOASETIRONPINWITHSURVEYCAP#LS4273WHICHISTHEPOINT OFBEGINNING;THENCERUNNORTH89°56'55"WESTFOR443.98FEETTOTHEWESTLINEOFTHE SOUTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSAIDSECTION12WHICHISMARKEDBYASETIRONPIN WITHSURVEYCAP#LS4273;THENCEALONGSAIDWESTLINERUNNORTH00°34'06"EASTFOR490.98 FEETTOTHENORTHLINEOFTHESOUTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSAIDSECTION12 WHICHISMARKEDBYANIRONPINWITHSURVEYCAP#LS4273;THENCEALONGSAIDNORTHLINE RUNSOUTH89°56'55"EAST,443.00FEETTOASETIRONPINWITHSURVEYCAP#LS4273;THENCE SOUTH00°26'50"WESTFOR490.08FEETTOTHEPOINTOFBEGINNING;BEINGINTHESOUTHEAST1/4 OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,COLLIERCOUNTY, FLORIDA. RegalAcresIIRPUDͲLegalDescription August2017Page2of3 REGALACRESIIRPUD EXHIBITD PlatDescriptionforExistingRegalAcresPUD APARCELOFLANDLOCATEDINSECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,COLLIERCOUNTY, FLORIDAANDBEINGMOREPARTICULARLYDESCRIBEDASFOLLOWS:COMMENCEATTHENORTHEAST CORNEROFSECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,COLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDAANDRUN SOUTH00°26'23"WESTALONGTHEEASTLINEOFSAIDSECTION12,ADISTANCEOF519.53FEETTO THENORTHEASTCORNEROFTHESOUTH1/2OFTHESOUTH1/2OFTHENORTH1/2OFTHE NORTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSAIDSECTION12;THENCESOUTH89°58'16"WEST ALONGTHENORTHLINEOFSAIDSOUTH1/2OFTHESOUTH1/2OFTHENORTH1/2OFTHE NORTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4,ADISTANCEOF30.00FEETTOTHEPOINTOFBEGINNING; THENCESOUTH00°26'23"WESTPARALLELWITHANDATAPERPENDICULARDISTANCEOF30.00FEET FROMSAIDEASTLINEOFSECTION12,ADISTANCEOF865.84FEETTOANINTERSECTIONWITHTHE SOUTHLINEOFTHESOUTH1/2OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSAIDSECTION12; THENCENORTH89°57'36"WESTALONGSAIDSOUTHLINE,ADISTANCEOF413.00FEETTOTHE NORTHEASTCORNEROFTHATPARCELOFLANDDESCRIBEDASPARCEL1INTHEWARRANTYDEED RECORDEDINOFFICIALRECORDSBOOK3812,PAGE1158OFTHEPUBLICRECORDSOFCOLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA;THENCESOUTH00°26'23"WESTALONGTHEEASTLINEOFSAIDPARCEL,A DISTANCEOF490.97FEETTOTHESOUTHEASTCORNEROFSAIDPARCEL;THENCENORTH89°57'36" WESTALONGTHESOUTHLINEOFSAIDPARCELANDTHESOUTHLINEOFTHATPARCELOFLAND DESCRIBEDASPARCEL2INSAIDDEEDRECORDEDINOFFICIALRECORDSBOOK3812,PAGE1158,A DISTANCEOF918.85FEETTOTHESOUTHWESTCORNEROFSAIDPARCEL2ATANINTERSECTIONWITH THEWESTLINEOFTHESOUTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSAIDSECTION12;THENCENORTH 00°33'00"EASTALONGSAIDWESTLINEANDTHEWESTLINESOFTHESOUTH1/2OFTHENORTHEAST 1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4ANDTHESOUTH1/2OFTHESOUTH1/2OFTHENORTH1/2OFTHE NORTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSAIDSECTION12,ADISTANCEOF1355.24FEETTOTHE NORTHWESTCORNEROFSAIDSOUTH1/2OFTHESOUTH1/2OFTHENORTH1/2OFTHENORTHEAST 1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSAIDSECTION12;THENCENORTH89°58'16"EASTALONGTHENORTH LINEOFSAIDSOUTH1/2OFTHESOUTH1/2OFTHENORTH1/2OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFTHE NORTHEAST1/4,ADISTANCEOF1329.25FEETTOTHESAIDPOINTOFBEGINNING.CONTAINING 1,601,428SQUAREFEETOR36.76ACRESOFLAND,MOREORLESS. RegalAcresIIRPUDͲLegalDescription August2017Page3of3 REGALACRESIIRPUD EXHIBITD LegalDescriptionforAdditional23.15Acres DESCRIPTION PARCELNo.00737760008&00741080606 (ORB39ϱϵ,PG3581) THEWEST1/2OFTHEEAST1/2OFTHEEAST1/2OFTHENORTHWEST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OF SECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,EXCEPTINGTHENORTH30FEETTHEREOF, WHICHISRESERVEDFORROADPURPOSES,ANDTHEEAST1/2OFTHEEAST1/2OFTHEEAST1/2OF THENORTHWEST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST, EXCEPTINGTHENORTH30FEETTHEREOF, WHICHISRESERVEDFORROADPURPOSES, OFTHEPUBLICRECORDSOFCOLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA. TOGETHERWITHTHEFOLLOWINGDESCRIBEDPARCEL: PARCELNo.00738280008 (ORB4467,PG1397) NORTH1/2OFTHESW1/4OFTHENW1/4OFTHENE1/4OFTHENE1/4OFSECTION12,TRACT51 SOUTH,RANGE26E.PROPERTYACQUIREDBYTAXDEEDOFFICIALRECORDSBOOK875,PAGE445,OF THEPUBLICRECORDSOFCOLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA TOGETHERWITHTHEFOLLOWINGDESCRIBEDPARCEL: PARCELNo.00737720006 (ORB5083,PG657) THEWEST1/2OFTHEEAST1/2OFTHENORTHWEST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSECTION12, TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,CONTAININGTEN(10)ACRES,MOREORLESS,EXCEPTINGTHE NORTH30FEETTHEREOF,WHICHISRESERVEDFORROADPURPOSES. TOGETHERWITHTHEFOLLOWINGDESCRIBEDPARCEL: PARCELNo.00741100104 (ORBϱϰϰϭ,PGϭϴϱϬ) (PERTITLECOMMITMENT) THENORTH30FEETOFTHENORTHWEST1/4(NW1/4)OFTHENORTHEAST1/4(NE1/4)OFSECTION 12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,COLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA,LESSANDEXCEPTIONTHAT PORTIONLYINGINTHEWEST1/2OFTHEWEST1/2OFTHENORTHWEST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4. ALSOBEINGDESCRIBEDASFOLLOWS: THEEAST1,018.64FEETOFTHENORTH30FEETOFTHENORTHWEST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OF SECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,COLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA. RegalAcresPhaseIIRPUDͲEvalautionCriteriaNarrative August2017Page1of6 REGALACRESPHASEIIRPUD EVALUATIONCRITERIANARRATIVE PUDRezoneConsiderations(LDCSection10.02.13.B) 1.Thesuitabilityoftheareaforthetypeandpatternofdevelopmentproposedinrelationto physicalcharacteristicsoftheland,surroundingareas,trafficandaccess,drainage,sewer, water,andotherutilities. TheRegalAcresIIRPUDprojectsiteconsistsof59.9acreslocatedonthewestsideof GreenwayRoadapproximately0.85milesnorthofU.S.41inSection12,Township51South, Range26East.Theeasterly36.75acresofthepropertywasrezonedfromRSFͲ5toRPUDin June2005andhasbeendevelopedwith184singleͲfamilyattacheddwellingunits.An additional116unitsareproposedontheremainderofthesitewhichiscurrentlyzonedRural Agricultural(A). ThesubjectpropertyislocatedintheUrbanMixedUseͲUrbanResidentialLandUsecategory. Thislandusecategorypermitsavarietyofresidentialdwellingtypesandadensityofupto eleven(11)unitsperacremaybeallowedthroughtheDensityRatingSystemandAffordable HousingBonusprogram.Theundevelopedportionofthesiteismostlysurroundedbyexisting development,includingNaplesReservetothenorth,WestWindEstatesMobileHomePark tothesouth,RegalAcresRPUDtotheeast,andReflectionLakestothewest. ThepropertyhasdirectaccessontoGreenwayRoad,alocalroadwaythatintersectswith U.S.41tothesouth.SewerandwaterwillbeprovidedbyCollierCountyUtilities.Otherpublic facilitiesandcommunityservicesarealsocurrentlyavailabletothesite.AmixedͲuseactivity centersubdistrictprovidingsupportcommercialusesislocatedattheintersectionofU.S.41 andCollierBoulevard(CR951)approximately3.4milestothenorthwest. Thesurfacewatermanagementsystemforthedevelopedportionofthesiteispermitted throughtheSouthFloridaWaterManagementDistrictunderEnvironmentalResourcePermit No.11Ͳ03051andincludestwowetdetentionlakesdischargingtotheCollierCountyCanal SystemattheGreenwayRoadSwale.Runofffromtheproposeddevelopmentsitewillbe collectedbyaseriesofswalesandinletsanddirectedtoaproposedwatermanagementlake whichwillbeconnectedtotheexistinglakesystem.Theoutfalllocationfortheoverallproject willremainunchangedbuttheoutfallstructurewillbemodifiedtoaccommodatethenew flows.Duetotheinterconnectednatureoftheproject,theminimumroadandfinishedfloor elevationsinthedevelopedandundevelopedportionsoftheprojectareanticipatedtobethe same. RegalAcresPhaseIIRPUDͲEvalautionCriteriaNarrative August2017Page2of6 ThelakeswillprovidethedetentionvolumerequiredtomeettheSouthFloridaWater ManagementDistrict’streatmentandattenuationrequirements.Thesystemwillattenuatethe runofffromthesitetotheallowabledischargerateof24csm(cubicfeetpersecondpersquare mile)pertheBelleMeadestudy.Thisdischargerateisconsistentwiththependingamendment totheCollierCountyCodeofLawsandOrdinancestoreducethemaximumallowableoffͲsite stormwaterdischargerates. Thetrafficstudysubmittedaspartofthisapplicationdeterminedthatallroadwaysegments surroundingtheprojectsiteareanticipatedtooperateatanacceptableLOSatprojectbuildͲ outandnoadditionalroadwayimprovementsarewarranted. 2.Adequacyofevidenceofunifiedcontrolandsuitabilityofanyproposedagreements,contract, orotherinstruments,orforamendmentsinthoseproposed,particularlyastheymayrelateto arrangementsorprovisionstobemadeforthecontinuingoperationandmaintenanceofsuch areasandfacilitiesthatarenottobeprovidedormaintainedatpublicexpense.Findingsand recommendationsofthistypeshallbemadeonlyafterconsultationwiththecountyattorney. HabitatforHumanityofCollierCountyistheownerofthepropertyandhasdemonstrated unifiedcontrolthroughthevariousaffidavitsprovidedaspartofthisapplication.Operation andmaintenanceresponsibilityforcommunityareasandfacilitiesshallbeassignedtothe HabitatforHumanityofCollierCounty.Thedevelopmentwillberequiredtogothrough plattingand/orsitedevelopmentplanapproval,whichwillfurtherdocumenttheproper stipulationsandassignmentsofresponsibilityforoperationandmaintenanceofinfrastructure bythedeveloper. 3.ConformityoftheproposedPUDwiththegoals,objectivesandpoliciesofthegrowth managementplan. Theproposedresidentialdevelopmentwillallowavarietyofresidentialuses,includingsingleͲ familydetached,singleͲfamilyattached,zerolotline,townhouseandmultiͲfamilyunits.Other proposedusesincludewatermanagementlakes,preserves,ancillaryrecreationaluses,open spaceandinternalroadwayswithsidewalks.Theproposedprojectwillbedesignedin compliancewiththegoals,objectivesandpoliciessetforthintheCollierCountyGrowth ManagementPlan(GMP)asindicatedbelow. ThesubjectpropertyislocatedwithintheUrbanMixedUseͲUrbanResidentialSubdistrict,as depictedontheCollierCountyFutureLandUseMap(FLUM).AccordingtotheGrowth ManagementPlan(GMP),theintentoftheUrbanMixedUseDistrictistoaccommodatea varietyofresidentialandnonͲresidentiallanduses,includingmixedͲusedevelopmentssuch asPlannedUnitDevelopments.TheUrbanResidentialSubdistrictprovidesforhigherdensities inareaswhereexistingandplannedpublicfacilitiesareconcentratedandtherearefewer RegalAcresPhaseIIRPUDͲEvalautionCriteriaNarrative August2017Page3of6 environmentalconstraints. TheUrbanResidentialSubdistrictpermitsabasedensityoffour(4)residentialunitspergross acre.TheprojectisalsolocatedwithintheCoastalHighHazardAreaandtheGrowth ManagementPlanstatesthatone(1)dwellingunitpergrossacreshallbesubtractedfromthe eligiblebasedensity.Additionally,theprojectwillprovideaffordableͲworkforcehousingand maybesubjecttoaddinganadditionaleight(8)unitsperacre.Assuch,thesubjectproperty iseligibleforamaximumofeleven(11)unitsperacreundertheadoptedDensityRating System. Therequestisforamaximumdensityoffive(5)dwellingunitspergrossacre.Thisiswell withinthedensitylimitationsoftheDensityRatingSystemandisconsistenttotheapproved densityadoptedonthepreviouslydevelopedportionofthepropertyunderOrdinance05Ͳ36. ThesubjectpropertyislocatedwithinanUrbanDesignatedAreawhichhasthenecessary infrastructureandpublicfacilitiesavailabletosupporttheproposedresidentialplanned development.PotablewaterandcentralsewerwillbeprovidedbyCollierCountyUtilities. Otherexistingservicesandcommunityfacilitieswhicharepresentlyavailableinclude: FireProtection:ThepropertyiswithintheEastNaplesFireDistrict.Station23is locatedat6055CollierBoulevard,approximately4.2milesaway. PoliceProtection:TheEastNaplesSubstationislocatedat8075LelyCulturalParkway approximately8milesaway. EmergencyMedical:MedicStation23islocatedat6055CollierBoulevard,approximately 4.2milesaway. Medical:PhysiciansRegionalHospitalislocatedat8300CollierBoulevard, approximately7.4milesaway. PublicSchools:ManateeElementarySchoolislocatedat1880ManateeRoad, approximately2.8milesaway. ManateeMiddleSchoolislocatedat1920ManateeRoad, approximately2.8milesaway. LelyHighSchoolislocatedat1LelyHighSchoolBoulevard, approximately7milesaway. Libraries:SouthRegionalLibraryislocatedat8065LelyCulturalBoulevard, approximately7.8milesaway. EastNaplesLibraryislocatedat8787TamiamiTrailEast, approximately7.9milesaway. PublicParks:CollierSeminoleStateParkislocatedat20200TamiamiTrailEast, approximately6milesaway. RegalAcresPhaseIIRPUDͲEvalautionCriteriaNarrative August2017Page4of6 EagleLakesParkislocatedat11565TamiamiTrailEast,approximately 9.8milesaway. PublicTransit:CollierAreaTransit(CAT)Route24runsalongU.S.41approximately 0.85milessouthofthesubjectproperty. Thesubjectproperty’sproximitytotheseexistingfacilitiesandservicesdemonstratesthatthe siteisanappropriatelocationforresidentialdevelopmentandtheproposedrequestwill promotegrowthtooccurinanefficientandeffectivemanner.Thisindicatescompliancewith FutureLandUseElement(FLUE)Objective3aswellasFLUEPolicies5.2,5.3,and5.5.The designoftheprojectthroughPlannedUnitDevelopmenttechniquesisalsoconsistentwith FLUEPolicy5.6. Theproposedresidentialprojectwillbewillbecompatible,withandcomplementaryto,the surroundinglandusesasrequiredbyFLUEPolicy5.4.Mostofthepropertiessurroundingthe undevelopedportionofthesitehavealreadybeendevelopedwithsimilarresidentialuses. Perimeterbufferingandotherdesignfeaturestofurtherpromoteinternalandexternal compatibilityaredocumentedintheresponsetoEvaluationCriteria#4. TheproposeddevelopmentwillalsobeconsistentwithPolicies7.1,7.2,7.3,and7.4ofthe FutureLandUseElement.Vehicularingressandegresstotheproposedadditionallandswill beprovidedviaanextensionofMajesticCircleandaninternallooproadwithsidewalks.The sidewalksystemwillalsointerconnectwiththeexistingneighborhoodwhichwilllinkthe recreationareaandothercommonopenspaceareaswithinthecommunity.Interconnections withtheexistingdevelopmentstothenorth,southandwestarenotfeasiblegiventhelocation ofbuffers,preserveareasandplattedlotswhichpresentlyexistontheseproperties. 4.Theinternalandexternalcompatibilityofproposeduses,whichconditionsmayinclude restrictionsonlocationofimprovements,restrictionsondesign,andbufferingandscreening requirements. Theproposeddevelopmentwillbecompatiblewiththeexistingresidentialusesthatborder theundevelopedportionofthesite.Theseusesaredescribedbelowalongwiththeproposed designparametersandbufferingprovisionsprovidedtoensurecompatibilitywitheach adjacentuse. TothenorthisNaplesReserve,a1,154unitresidentialdevelopmentwithzoningdesignation ofRPUD.Theprojecthasanapprovedatadensityof1.67dwellingunitsperacreandhasan 80footbuffertractwhichabutsthenorthernpropertylineofthesubjectproperty.The proposeddevelopmentwillprovidea10footType“A”landscapebufferalongthisproperty line.Inaddition,alakeandpreserveareawillalsobeprovidedinthenorthernportionofthe subjectproperty,creatingaminimumbuildingseparationdistanceofapproximately375feet RegalAcresPhaseIIRPUDͲEvalautionCriteriaNarrative August2017Page5of6 betweenthenearestdwellingunitinNaplesReserve. TothesouthisWestWindEstates,a270unitmobilehomepark.Theprojecthasazoning designationofMHandadensityofapproximately4.6dwellingunitsperacre.Theproposed developmentwillprovidea15footType“B”landscapebufferalongitssouthernpropertyline. Additionalbufferingwillalsobeprovidedbyapreserveareaalongaportionofthisboundary. Theapplicantalsoseeksadeviationtoallowan8Ͳfoottallwalltofurtherprovidebuffering andprotectiongiventheproximityoftheadjoiningdrainageditchtothesouthofproposed recreationarea. TheexistingRegalAcresdevelopmentoccupiestheeasternboundaryofthesubjectadditional developmentarea.Theexistingdevelopmentcontains184unitresidentialdevelopmentwith azoningdesignationofRPUDthatwasapprovedatadensityof5dwellingunitsperacre.The proposeddevelopmentwillbecomethesecondphaseofthisprojectandwillbedesignedwith aunifiedarchitecturaltheme,interconnectedsidewalksandpathways,andshared recreationalamenityareas.Theproposedpropertyregulationswillmaintainthemaximum approvedbuildingheightof35feetandtheoveralldensitywillremainat5dwellingunitsper acre. TothewestisReflectionLakes,a612residentialdevelopmentwithazoningdesignationof PUD.Theprojectwasapprovedatadensityof3dwellingunitsperacreandhasa140±foot widepreserveareaadjacenttothewesternboundaryofthesubjectproperty,aligningwith theproposedpreserveonthesubjectproperty.Theproposeddevelopmentwillprovide5.8 acresofcontiguouspreserveareaonsitewhichwillprovideabuildingseparationdistanceof atleast300feetfromthenearestdwellingunitinReflectionLakes. InadditiontotheaboveͲreferencedresidentialdevelopments,thereisalsoavacant1.35± acreparceltotheeastanda10.55±acreparcellocatedtothenortheastwithamobilehome. BothparcelshaveaRuralAgriculturalzoningdesignation,however,theyhavethesameUrban MixedUseͲUrbanResidentialSubdistrictFutureLandUsedesignationasthesubjectproperty andcouldberezonedforsimilarresidentialusesinthefuture.A10footType“A”landscape bufferisproposedwherethesubjectpropertyabutstheseparcels. 5.Theadequacyofusableopenspaceareasinexistenceandasproposedtoservethe development. Theproposeddevelopmentwillprovideaminimumof60percentcommonopenspaceas requiredbytheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode.Usableopenspaceareasinclude commonareas,pedestrianwalkways,lakes,arecreationarea,anda5.8acrepreservation tract.Thepreserveareais25percentoftheadditionallandarea,meetingnativepreserve requirement. RegalAcresPhaseIIRPUDͲEvalautionCriteriaNarrative August2017Page6of6 6.Thetimingorsequenceofdevelopmentforthepurposeofassuringtheadequacyofavailable improvementsandfacilities,bothpublicandprivate. Itisdocumentedabovethatadequatepublicandprivatefacilitiesarecurrentlyinplaceto servetheproposeddevelopment.Waterandsewerserviceisavailable.Existingroadway capacityanddrainagefeaturesareadequateforthesite;andschools,police,fire,bus,park, andhealthcarefacilitiesarealllocatedwithintheproposeddevelopment’sservicearea. Wastemanagement,cable,electric,andtelephoneservicesarealsoavailable. ThedevelopmentispartoftheUS41DevelopersConsortiumfortheUS41wideningand intersectionimprovementsattheCR951andUS41intersectionasreferencedintheTIS providedatthetimeofrezone.PertheDeveloperContributionAgreement(OR4408PG 2880),improvementsconsistedofimprovementsattheintersectionofCR951andUS41,sixͲ laneroadimprovementsfromtheintersectionofCR951andUS41toHendersonCreek,and fourͲlaneroadimprovementsfromHendersonCreekto0.25mileseastofNaplesReserve Blvd.PertheImpactFeeandAnticipatedAdvancementofRoadImpactFeetableincludedin theDeveloperContributionAgreement,roadimpactfeesintheamountof$1,445,967.60has beenpaidfortheexistingRegalAcres184Ͳunitsubdivision,and$471,511.20hasbeenpaid for60ofthe116additionaldwellingunitsassociatedwithproposedRegalAcresII. 7.Theabilityofthesubjectpropertyandofsurroundingareastoaccommodateexpansion. Thesubjectpropertyisaninfillparcelthatisalreadyalmostcompletelysurroundedbyexisting development.Giventheseconstraints,thefutureexpansionoftheprojectisextremely limited.Theonlypotentialexpansionthatcouldpossiblyoccurwouldbetothenorthofthe developedportionofthesitewherethereisavacant1.35±acreparcelanda2.46±acreparcel withanexistingsingleͲfamilyresidence.Farthernorthisa10.55±acreparcelwithanexisting mobilehome. 8.ConformitywithPUDregulations,orastodesirablemodificationsofsuchregulationsinthe particularcase,basedondeterminationthatsuchmodificationsarejustifiedasmeetingpublic purposestoadegreeatleastequivalenttoliteralapplicationofsuchregulations. TheproposeddevelopmentconformswiththeintentofthePUDregulationsbyestablishing developmentregulationsthatareconsistentwithsimilarresidentialdevelopments throughoutCollierCounty.Therequesteddeviationsprovidedesignflexibilitythatwillhelp improvetheoverallprojectwhilefurtheringpublicpurposesofhealth,safetyandwelfare. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership See Attachment 1. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: GHU, LLC parcel #00737720006 under contract for purchase by Habitat for Humanity, Inc. See Attachment 1. See Attachment 2. RegalAcresRPUDͲListofOwnershipandCorporationParties ƵŐƵƐƚ2018Page1of1 ATTACHMENTϯ REGALACRESRPUD ListofOwnershipandCorporationParties forHabitatforHumanityofCollierCounty,Inc. PercentageofOwnership HabitatforHumanityofCollierCounty,Inc. 100%ofFolio#s 00737760008 00741080606 00738280008 00741100104 SeeattachedSunBizreportforregisteredagent/officerdetails. ϬϬϳϯϳϳϮϬϬϬϲ Department of State /Division of Corporations /Search Records /Detail By Document Number / Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed State Status Last Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date Detail by Entity Name Florida Not For Profit Corporation HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. Filing Information 742136 59-1834379 03/20/1978 FL ACTIVE AMENDMENT 11/05/1999 NONE Principal Address 11145 TAMIAMI TRAL EAST NAPLES, FL 34113 Changed: 03/09/2005 Mailing Address 11145 TAMIAMI TRAL EAST NAPLES, FL 34113 Changed: 03/09/2005 Registered Agent Name & Address Cunningham, John 841 Partridge Ct MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Name Changed: 02/03/2017 Address Changed: 02/03/2017 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title S MUELLER, MICHAEL 1109 STRAWBERRY COURT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 DIVISION OF CORPORATIONSFlorida Department of State Page 1 of 3Detail by Entity Name 10/25/2017http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... Title VC SWIHART, STANARD MD 789 REGENCY RESERVE CIR APT 4603 NAPLES, FL 34119 Title Chairman of the Board CUNNINGHAM, JOHN W 841 PARTRIDGE CT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Title CEO LEFKOW, LISA REV. 1490 NOTTINGHAM DR NAPLES, FL 34109 Title President KOULOHERAS, NICK 6130 CYPRESS HOLLOW WAY NAPLES, FL 34109 Title VC Hubbard, Edward 785 Cocobay Drive Naples, FL 34108 Title VC Jilk, Craig 4101 Gulf Shore Blvd N 105 Naples, FL 34103 Title VC Peterson, Doug 849 Swan Dr. Marco Island, FL 34145 Title Treasurer Deal, Rick 2495 Rue Du Jardin Unit 402 Naples, FL 34105 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date Page 2 of 3Detail by Entity Name 10/25/2017http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 2016 02/01/2016 2017 02/03/2017 2017 08/29/2017 Document Images 08/29/2017 -- AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/03/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/01/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/12/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/25/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/22/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/25/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/25/2011 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/05/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/23/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/26/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/08/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/25/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/09/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/20/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/02/2003 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/04/2002 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/06/2001 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/06/2000 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/05/1999 -- Amendment View image in PDF format 03/11/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/04/1998 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/26/1997 -- Name Change View image in PDF format 01/31/1997 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/24/1996 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations Page 3 of 3Detail by Entity Name 10/25/2017http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... August 2018 ATTACHMENT 2 REGAL ACRES RPUD Date Property Acquired and Warranty Deeds 2350 Stanford Court ■Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 ■ Fax (239) 434-9320 SINCE 1946 The attached Warranty Deed dated June 28, 2018 documents the transaction of the parcel identified as Folio #00737720006. In the initial application for the referenced rezone (PL20170001733) this parcel was indicated as under contract for purchase by Habitat for Humanity, Inc. Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. is now the owner. Please include this deed as part of your file, replacing the previous owner information and prior deed for this parcel. We will also include this deed in the applicant’s backup material for the CCPC. TO: James Sabo, AICP DATE: August 6, 2018 FROM: Laura DeJohn, AICP RE: PL20170001733 - Regal Acres RPUD Deed dated 6/28/18 WarrantyDeeds ExistingRegalI OriginalFolio#s00740760008,00740480003,00737400009 WarrantyDeeds Folio#s00737760008,00741080606,00738280008,00741100104 $ 550,000 $ 268,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 79,050 $ 0 $ 79,050 $ 9,486 $ 69,564 $ 0 $ 0 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00737760008 Site Adr. Name / Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E City NAPLES State FL Zip 34113-7753 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 6B12 000100 012 6B12 12 51 26 5.27 Legal 12 51 26 W1/2 OF E1/2 OF E1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS N 30 FT Millage Area 25 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 70 - VACANT INSTITUTIONAL 5.245 6.258 11.503 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 01/04/06 3959-3581 01/25/05 3921-645 11/16/00 2744-746 05/01/68 273-547 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 8/5/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=757462977&ccpaver=1707221124&Fol... $ 15,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,775 $ 0 $ 8,775 $ 8,775 $ 8,775 $ 8,775 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00738280008 Site Adr. Name / Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CC INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST City NAPLES State FL Zip 34113 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 6B12 000100 022 6B12 12 51 26 1.35 Legal 12 51 26 N1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 1.35 AC OR 875 PG 445 Millage Area 25 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 07/20/17 5418-840 07/20/17 5418-838 06/29/09 4467-1397 07/01/80 875-445 11/01/73 564-645 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 10/25/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... $ 500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 100 $ 0 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00741100104 Site Adr. Name / Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRAIL E City NAPLES State FL Zip 34113 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres£ *Estimated 6B12 000100 1006B12 12 51 26 1.4 Legal 12 51 26 E 1018.64FT OF N 30FT OF NW 1/4 OF NE1/4 Millage Area 25 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 10/18/17 5441-1853 10/18/17 5441-1850 04/19/68 270-867 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 10/25/2017http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... )BCJUBUGPS)VNBOJUZPG$PMMJFS$PVOUZ *OD (;+,%,7$3$5&(/$0$67(53/$1 OVERLAP AREA SECTIONTYPICAL RESIDENCE/EXISTING LAKEN.T.S.REGAL ACRES RPUDEXHIBIT BRPUD MASTER PLANPARCEL BHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYMHPUDPUDARESIDENTIALMOBILE HOMEPARKRESIDENTIALSINGLE FAMILYVACANTPRESERVEAAAVACANTARESIDENTIALSINGLE FAMILYPUDLUCLEGENDPARCEL BPARCEL ALAND SUMMARY USECATEGORY ACREAGETOTAL SITE AREAMAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS300 D.U. (5 D.U. / AC)184 D.U. (5 D.U. / AC)116 D.U. (5 D.U. / AC)REQUIRED / PROVIDED PRESERVENATIVE VEGETATION CALCULATIONS51332244#PUD DEVIATION(TYPICAL)4 TYPICAL STREET SECTIONTYPICAL ALLEY SECTIONTYPICAL PRESERVE SECTIONREGAL ACRES RPUDEXHIBIT B-2RPUD MASTER PLAN - PARCEL BCROSS SECTIONSHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTY REGAL ACRES RPUDEXHIBIT B-3MASTER UTILITY AND DRAINAGE PLANPARCEL BHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYMHPUDRESIDENTIALMOBILE HOMEPARKPRESERVELEGENDPUDPARCEL BPARCEL A REGAL ACRES RPUDEXHIBIT B-4EXISTING AND PROPOSEDPUD BOUNDARYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYPARCEL BPARCEL A 4A ❚FRIDAY, MAY 18, 2018 ❚NAPLES DAILY NEWS + 4515 S Cleveland Ave........................................239-275-9566 3770 Tamiami Trail N........................................239-213-4276 Fort Myers Naples *Discount valid on La-Z-Boy items only and excludes advertised items, custom orders, clearance items, special offers, fabric protection, prior purchases, delivery and sales tax. Discount cannot be combined with any other promotional offer, excluding financing. Price does not include delivery fee. Savings may not be based on actual sales. Product shown is representative of stock and selection, style and color may vary by store. Quantities may be limited. Every precautionistakentoproduceaccuratedetails,errorsinpriceand/oroffersmayoccurinprint;wereservetherighttocorrectanysucherrors.Offerexpires 6/4/2018. See store for details. **Offer applies only to single-receipt qualifying purchases. No interest will be charged on promo purchase and equal monthly payments are required equal to initial promo purchase amount divided equally by the number of months in promo period until promo is paid in full. The equal monthly payment will be rounded to the next highest whole dollar and may be higher than the minimum payment that would be required if the purchase was a non-promotional purchase. Regular account terms apply to non-promotional purchases. For new accounts: Purchase APR is 29.99%; Minimum Interest Charge is $2. Existing cardholders should see their credit card agreement for their applicable terms.Subject to credit approval. Any discount, coupon, manufacturer rebate, or other promotional offer applied at time of purchase will reduce your total purchase amount and may result in you not satisfying the minimum qualifying purchase amount required. Also in: Tampa, Clearwater, New Port Richey, Brandon, Lakeland orig.$999 $799NATALIE Stationary Sofa SAV E $200 HUGE SAVIN GS FOR LIMITED TIME ONLY! W ITH PU R C HAS E OF $3000 OR MORE*25 % OFF WITH PURC HAS E U PTO$999*15 % OFF WITH PU R C HAS E OF $1000- 2999*20 % OFF On purchases of $5000 or more (after discount)made on your La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries Credit Card through 6/4/2018. Equal monthlypayments required.0%I NTERES TFO R 3 6MO NTHS** H ROWAN Rocker Recliner $498 orig.$599 JAMES Leather Rocker Recliner $799 orig.$999 S AV E $200 B AYLOR Rocker Recliner $524 orig.$699 S AV E $100 S AV E $175 Nearly all of our recliners, sofas & chairs are proudly built in the U.S.A. of domestic andimported materials. A SK ABOUT OUR DESIGN SERVICES! P O WER AND/OR airform™UPGRADES AVAILABLE ON ALL RECLINING STYLES ND-FMN0002114-01 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING ThepublicisinvitedtoattendaneighborhoodmeetingheldbyHabitat for Humanity of Collier County on: Monday, June 4, 2018 at 5:30 p.m. at First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples 14600 Tamiami Trail E, Naples, FL 34114 SubjectProperty:Thepropertyislocatedonthewestsideof Greenway Road east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), and north of U.S. 41 consisting of a total of 59.90+/- acres. The applicant is petitioning Collier County to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by changing the zoning classification of 23.15+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD, amending the master plan to include the additional land, increasing the permissible number of dwelling units from 184 to 300, revising the development standards, adding deviations, revising developer commitments; and by approval of an affordable housing density bonus agreement for the added 23.15 acres that will generate 46 bonus units for low or moderate income residents. [PL20170001733] WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner/ developer and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail by July 5, 2018 to: James Sabo, AICP Collier County Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Email: James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov Phone: (239) 252-2708 Fax: (239) 252-6358 Five people arrested in the Sunday death of a Fort Myers man will remain behind bars for now. Lee County Judge Maria E. Gonzalez denied the suspects bail during their first appearance hearings Wednesday afternoon. The five — Taquan Ramel Brown, 27, Mario Joel Benitez, 22, Cheyenne Nicole Marron, 22, Edey Emmanuel Cardenas, 21, and Roger Ludenas, 21— are accused of planning a robbery that led to the death of Daryl D. Scott at a home in the 300 block of Louise Avenue. The five suspects were arrested by Fort Myers police Tuesday. Scott, 32, was taken to Lee Memorial Hospital where he was pronounced dead. He was the fourth homicide vic- tim of the year in the city. “We just want to say thank you to the Fort Myers Police Department,” said Scott’s sister Latosha Scott. Scott’s family was in the courtroom but declined to comment further. The five defendants are facing charges of second-degree murder, at- tempted second-degree murder, armed robbery and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. Evidence disclosed by attorneys Wednesday include testimony from a co-defendant and from a surviving vic- tim, Rejanay Smith, 23, who is acting as a witness for the state. Smith was ar- rested Tuesday for an unrelated charge out of Collier County. An attorney for one of the suspects argued the evidence was circumstantial and hinged on the testimony of another one of the defendants. “There’s no admission by my client to his involvement,” said Steven H. Whit- ten, an attorney representing Ludenas. Ludenas’ fianceé, Mikaila Faber, told the judge he was from Miamibut that he had lived in Lee County for four years. Faber said Ludenas has worked at a bar for about four months. “Roger was not involved,” she said af- ter Ludenas’ hearing. Faber said Ludenas’ roommates were responsible for the crime. She said Lu- denas could not have done it because he was getting home when it happened. After the hearing a Fort Myers police detective asked Faber for contact infor- mation to try to verify Ludenas’ possible alibi. The remainder of the suspects were represented by a public defender. “In reviewing this narrative, there is very little physical evidence in this par- ticular case,” public defender Sean Czarnomski said. “It is all pretty much circumstantial. … It totally goes, not to- tally, but mostly on the confession of a co-defendant with little to no corrobo- rating physical evidence.” Czarnomski said the guns were not recovered, and he said the surviving victim lacked credibility to testify against the defendants. He asked bail be 5 remain held in killing of Fort Myers man, 32 Michael Braun Fort Myers News-Press USA TODAY NETWORK - FLORIDA Clockwise, from top left: Cardenas, Benitez, Marron, Brown and Ludenas. SPECIAL TO FORT MYERS NEWS-PRESS See HOMICIDE, Page 8A PROJECT:REGAL ACRES RPUD(PL20170001733) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING DATE OF MEETING:JUNE4, 2018, 5:30 P.M. LOCATION:FIRST HAITIAN BAPTIST CHURCH OF NAPLES 14600TAMIAMI TRAIL E, NAPLES,FL34114 ATTENDEES: Sign-in Sheets are attached. The meeting began with an introduction of the applicant’s representatives. Nick Kouloheras presented on behalf the developer/applicant, Habitat for Humanity of Collier County. Other representatives on behalf of the applicant were project planner Laura DeJohn, ecologist Laura Herrero, engineer Jared Brown, and land use attorney Neale Montgomery. Collier County Planner James Sabo was present and was recognized as the County staff planner for the project. The applicant representatives displayed a PowerPoint presentation, explaining that the request is a rezoning of 23.15 acres of land from Rural Agricultural (A) to Regal Acres RPUD, allowing for 116 additional dwelling units, or 5 units per acre. The request includes an affordable housing density bonus agreement that generates 46 bonus units for low or moderate income residents. Handouts were provided with the list of permitted uses in the existing Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district and the list of permitted uses proposed in the RPUD. Maps of the site location and surrounding neighborhoods were displayed. It was noted the existing Regal Acres neighborhood of 18homes was constructed around 2005 and many communities have developed in the area since then. The proposed development standards, density and open space are consistent with the patterns in the surrounding community. Site line diagrams were shown to indicate distance and views from Reflection Lakes (300’ of preserve between the existing and the proposed homes); Naples Reserve (400’ of open space, lake and landscape buffer between the existing and the proposed homes); and West Wind Mobile Home Park (ranging from 150’ including preserve between the existing and proposed homes to 100’ including landscape buffer between the existing homes and proposed recreation area). The proposed community design was described, and artists renderings were displayed. Explanations were provided for Growth Management Plan consistency, density rating system, suitability of physical characteristics of the land, and adequacy of transportation, access, drainage, sewer and water. The applicant representatives presented a “Frequently Asked Questions” session to address comments often raised when Habitat for Humanity projects are proposed. The floor was opened for audience questions and comments. None of the comments resulted in additional or new commitments by the developer other than to evaluate and reconvene with Naples Reserve residents about the potential for adding a wall facing Naples Reserve, and to look into methods to address speeding along Greenway Road. Refer to the full transcript of the meeting for the verbatim comments. In addition to the transcript, attached are two letters from property owners that were provided for the NIM. <end> MEETING SUMMARY 1 TRANSCRIPT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING FOR REGAL ACRES II JUNE 4, 2018 Appearances: LAURA DeJOHN NEALE MONTGOMERY JARED BROWN LAURA HERRERO LISA LEFKOW NICK KOULOHERAS JAMES SABO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 MS. DeJOHN: It is 5:30. We want to do our best job to get you all the information we can on this neighborhood information meeting. And then get you the ability to go home and enjoy the rest of your evening. I'm Laura DeJohn. I'm a planner with Johnson Engineering here today on behalf of Habitat for Humanity of Collier County. I will give the opportunity real quick for anyone who is far back in the room, if you want to be able to see slides a little more clearly, now is the time to come forward just so you can have a better view. If you're comfortable where you are, that's fine, too. But I think it will be hard to see from that far back. Okay. For housekeeping purposes, there are restrooms right in the main entrance where you came in and signed in. I want to explain real quickly the reason why we're here tonight. We're having a neighborhood information meeting as required by Collier County. Again, Habitat for Humanity has submitted for a rezoning application and Collier County requires this meeting to be held, inviting all the neighbors, to talk about the uses that are proposed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 within the new development and the physical design, the master plan of the new development, and this is our opportunity to explain the intentions of the project to you and your opportunity to give us feedback. Per the county requirements, this meeting is being recorded. It's also being videoed. There will be a transcript made of the meeting. So we do ask, when there are -- when there is the opportunity for questions at the end, we'll need you to speak into the microphones that are at the front of the room because of those requirements for a recording to be made and a transcript of the meeting. We do have representation from Collier County here tonight. James Sabo, which I can't see that far back in the room -- oh, there he is. James is with Collier County. He's the county planner reviewing this rezoning application, and he's available through the county for questions because all the application materials we have, including the transcripts from this meeting and the PowerPoint slides from this meeting will be available as public record. So to give some quick introductions, the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 applicant that's proposing the rezoning that we're here to discuss is Habitat for Humanity of Collier County. Habitat is a not-for-profit organization. Many of you might be familiar with Habitat for Humanity. Their mission is to give a hand up to people, not a handout. They help people find homes who deserve homes, working people. Also here tonight, who you will hear from, is our land use attorney from Pavese Law Firm, Neale Montgomery. And you'll hear from Engineer, Jared Brown, and ecologist Laura Herrero. Now this fine print is the official request that goes through the county process for rezoning. We have submitted the application for rezoning. There will be subsequent meetings after this neighborhood meeting. This is required before the item proceeds to the public hearing process of the Collier County Planning Commission and then the Board of County Commissioners. Those two meetings, the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners meetings have not been scheduled yet, but once we get through this neighborhood 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5 information meeting process, we expect those to be scheduled in the next few months. This request is a request to rezone 23 acres that's currently zoned agriculture. And the rezoning is from agriculture to residential planned unit development. This is additional lands in addition to the current Regal Acres neighborhood that exists along Greenway Road. The addition would, again, be 23 acres, and would have 116 housing units on it. There's currently 184 units at the existing Regal Acres subdivision and this addition of 23 acres would have 116 units on it. This request involves the county's bonus density program. The county incentivizes or encourages affordable housing by rewarding applicants to do affordable housing with additional densities and the additional density grant for this request would be 46 bonus units based on the formulas that the county provides in, again, encouraging affordable housing in the county. Hopefully, this isn't too hard to see from the back. This location diagram just shows you where exactly that 23-acre addition is. It's accessed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 6 through the existing Regal Acres subdivision off of Greenway Road. We're showing you some -- a little bit of data about the surrounding properties surrounding the Regal Acres subdivision and the proposed 23-acre addition. And what's interesting about the surrounding conditions is that the Regal Acres community, dating back to 2005, existed before many of the larger neighborhoods have come to this part of East Naples. When I reference additional larger neighborhood, Reflection Lakes to the west; Naples Reserve to the north; and, of course, the long-term buildout of Fiddler's Creek across U.S. 41, have all occurred subsequent to that 2005 time frame when Regal Acres was initiated and this second phase was always part of the plan as well. A little closer view. Hopefully, you can see what we're describing as the 23-acre addition, is this wooded area labeled as parcel B on the map. And the existing Regal Acres is this area labeled parcel A on the map. Why we're here, this is the zoning map which shows you the conditions with the predominant type 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 7 of zoning in this area is residential planned unit development with Regal Acres subdivision being zoned residential planned unit development. Reflection Lakes, zoned residential planned unit development. Naples Reserve to the north is zoned the same. And this rezoning of the subject site would rezone from agriculture to a similar planned unit development. As part of the planning process, we look to be compatible with the neighborhood, so we look at the surrounding communities and things like the development standards and the densities in those communities. The standards proposed for the Regal Acres II community are consistent, within 10 to 20 percent range of difference, to the development standards that are in place in those surrounding communities of Reflection Lakes, Naples Reserve and West Winds. The density proposed is five units per acre, which is the same as the Regal Acres subdivision that exists today. And, again, within a very close range to the net densities of properties right around this proposed site. Open space is consistent with county standards 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 8 and consistent with the neighborhood with a large amount of open space dedicated on the site, 60 percent. Okay. We wanted to give perspective, since everyone who is mostly here is here because they live around the site. We wanted to give perspective on how the site plan is proposed and the distances between proposed houses at the Regal Acres project to houses that exist at Reflection Lakes or at Naples Reserve or at West Winds. Again, hopefully, you're able to see this. There's a 300-foot distance between the proposed homes at Regal Acres and the existing homes, the closest existing homes at Reflection Lakes. 300 feet is about the distance of a football field. The proposed homes at Regal Acres will be 400 feet from the nearest home in Naples Reserve. Again, that would be the distance over a football field. And the nearest home to the West Winds mobile home park and units there would be 150 feet. The master plan that's shown on this slide, and, again, we do have larger blowups of these different diagrams in the back, the master plan shows the types of landscape buffers that are going 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9 to go on along the sides of the properties, all the edges of this property will either be buffered with preserve or with a type B landscape buffer that's 15 feet wide, which is the county standard for having trees spaced with a hedge that is six feet tall and opaque, where you can't see through the hedge that's six feet tall. Again, this diagram is in the back of the room if you want to study it and you live right in one of these houses that's nearby in Reflection Lakes or Naples Reserve or in West Winds. This diagram shows you the true distance between the proposed houses at Regal Acres and the existing homes at those three communities that are adjacent to us, and it shows what's in between those distances, whether it's preserve, trees, landscape trees and buffers. Those are the two conditions that you would see from a backyard in any of those communities, and these diagrams show that. Now, the idea for this community has been a creative process. You know, Habitat for Humanity has, again, been around Collier County for a long time and they're always looking to raise the bar, so to speak, and do better and do more with their communities, and the development model for this 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 10 community in particular was taken from some award-winning communities in Florida. If you're familiar with Watercolor or Seaside in the panhandle, these communities are designed to be more neighborhood oriented, have a neighborhood feel, be walkable, not so auto oriented, but more oriented to be able to comfortably walk and bicycle in your own neighborhood. So it's a compact design. Again, that compact design accomplishes a few things. It makes the community more tight in nature on the land. It allows for a greater amount of control and maintenance of common areas when the houses are built in a compact way. And when the neighborhood is built compactly on the site, there's that room to create buffers and preserve areas to the perimeter of the site to have buffers to neighbors. So this is a good design, given the types of people who want to be able to live in a neighborhood condition like a community like this and to create those opportunities for buffering around the peripheries. So this layout is an artist rendering, but what we're trying to show you is, again, the consistency of how development patterns are in the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 11 area and how this proposed development lays out and those distances that separate proposed houses at the Regal Acres project from the houses at Reflection Lakes here. Again, that's that 300-foot separation with preserve area. The separation here with a lake and 400 feet between Regal Acres and Naples Reserve. And the separation of the proposed houses at Regal Acres and West Winds with 150 feet here, mostly preserve, and then an area with recreation. Just another sense of how the community would look and feel. This is an artist rendering of the types of houses, the streetscape conditions, the planting types, the sidewalks that are proposed on both sides of the street and mainly the architecture. Again, Habitat kind of can have -- people can have preconceived notions about what a Habitat home is or what it looks like, and when you see a house that, you know, would be enjoyable to live in based on the way it's designed and the architecture and old Florida style like this, maybe you could, you know, change preconceived notions that you might have about Habitat homes. In order to get through the rezoning process, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 12 the key criteria include making sure the project is consistent with the Growth Management Plan of Collier County. That's the foundational document that determines how the county grows over a 10, 20, 30-year period. And this proposed project has been deemed consistent by a county staff with the Growth Management Plan. It lies within the urban mixed use, urban residential land use category, which is exactly what's being proposed, a residential neighborhood. The county, again, like I mentioned, kind of incentivizes or encourages the provision of affordable housing with affording housing density bonuses so that more units can be put onto properties. The county would allow up to 11 units per acre on this property, and the proposal is for five units per acre. MS. HERRERO: So just to kind of follow up on what Laura was saying, when we start a zoning application process, we always want to make sure that the development is being done consistent with the county's growth management processes and their land development codes, and this specifically 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 13 applies to the area that I work in, which is your ecological aspects of the project. So one of the first things that we do is we actually go out onto the property and we actually map the different types of vegetation, habitat and also look for any listed species utilization that may be on the site. What's really important to note about this site is because the area was predominantly agriculture around it for a long time, the site is not in pristine condition like you, you know, might expect of some areas. We have greater than 25 percent exotics over the majority of the site, about 21 out of the 23 acres. We did identify approximately six acres of wetlands on the property, which you kind of see. See the hatch pattern, diagonal. And through -- those are important because through the planning process, knowing what type of habitat there are, whether we have listed species utilization in those wetlands, we then try to plan, where is the best place for a preserve to be to meet the county standards. For this particular property, we have 25 percent of the property set aside for preserve. So 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 14 that's just a little under six acres of the site. And one of the previous slides that Laura had shown, the preserve is actually located on the western side of the property, and as Laura mentioned afterwards, there are some larger blowups of the site plan in the back of the room. And that preserve was placed where it is because that is adjacent to the preserve for Reflection Lakes. So from an ecological value, a habitat value for wildlife, we wanted the largest preserve tract as possible, and having that in location, you know, it allows us to add on to the preserve that Reflection Lakes already has and that also allowed us to incorporate the maximum amount of wetlands that we could into that preserve. Through the county and the district, water management district permitting process and the Corps of Engineers, we have to minimize our wetland impacts to the extent possible. So that is one of the reasons why the preserve was placed where it was at. The other thing that we look at are management plans for listed species. As we go through the permitting process, not only with the county, but the state and federal, we have the plans reviewed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 15 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. And what we try to do are what are the species that are out there and then what can we do to address co-existence of that particular species with the humans in the area to the extent possible. So in this area, we do know that there have been Florida black bear sightings. So we do have a Florida black bear management plan. Black bears wander into areas. We actually just had one reported in Fort Myers today near U.S. 41 and Colonial, right in the smack dab center of town. They tend not to stay, though, unless there's food available to them. So one of the things that the project is committed to doing, both Regal Acres phase one and the proposed phase, is having that education plan for its residents to let them know you need to keep your trash secured. It needs to not go out until right the morning before, you know, keeping bird feeders in, not keeping dog food out, things like that to void having that food source for the bears. So that's just one of the management plans. Again, that will be reviewed through all of those permitting processes and incorporated into the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 approvals for the project. And then the other one that we have management plans for right now are wading birds, and that's really that anytime we have potential impacts to wetlands during the development, we want to make sure that we don't have any direct impacts to them during construction. With that, I'll turn it back over to Laura. Oh, I'm sorry, Jared. MR. BROWN: For those of you that have been here for more than a few years, you'll remember that not long ago the area in front of -- U.S. 41 in front of this project was only a two-lane highway, pardon me. The community planners saw that coming years in advance and in 2008 developed the U.S. 41 Developers Consortium. Habitat for Humanity was part of that, along with a number of other developers, and the intent was to provide funds to have improvements to the intersection of 951 and 41, as well as widen portions of 41 itself. At that time, Habitat paid their fees for all the units that were developed in Regal Acres I as well as prepaying for an additional 60 units that are part of this project. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 As Laura said, the access to this project is through the existing Regal Acres community, so there would be no additional connections to Greenway, and we don't anticipate any significant impacts to the surrounding roadway network. Regal Acres existing is covered by an environmental resource permit issued by the South Florida Water Management District, and the intent is to incorporate this part of the development into that. The lakes will be interconnected and it will have a holistic interconnected water management system. The surface water discharge will remain unchanged location-wise to the Greenway Road swale. Since this project is in the Belle Meade study area, the discharge rate is severely limited. For this project, it's 24 CSM, and that is consistent with not only the Belle Meade study, but also the recently adopted Collier County discharge rate ordinance of 2016. And a final little note, for water management, anyway. Regal Acres is the only development on Greenway that actually discharges to the roadside swale in a controlled manner. Water and sewer. Prior to the development of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 18 Regal Acres phase 1, water and sewer was not available on Greenway Road. At their cost, Habitat extended potable water and wastewater facilities all the way from 41 to their project about a mile. This allowed additional residents on Greenway to have potable service as well as fire protection. The new infrastructure will be just tied into this and there should be no degradation of service to the rest of the community. In addition, Collier County has requested and Habitat has granted or will grant a utility easement on this phase 2 property for their future well field expansion that will end up providing water service to the entire region. MS. MONTGOMERY: Gee. For the record -- is this on? Can you hear me? Laura, come on up here, if you would. My name is Neale Montgomery. I'm an attorney. And what I'd like to do is ask some of the questions I think -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: We can't hear you. MS. MONTGOMERY: It's not working? MS. DeJOHN: Just stand here. MS. MONTGOMERY: What I'd like to do is ask some of the questions I think you might have to try 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 19 to facilitate the question-and-answer session. One of the questions I think that residents often have is most of my personal wealth is invested in my house and I'm worried what's going to happen to my property values. And so I'd like to know if you can address what they can anticipate relative to impact on property values. MR. KOULOHERAS: Good evening, everyone. Just for the record, my name is Nick Kouloheras and I'm the president of Habitat for Humanity of Collier County. To answer that question about property values, because that's one that's brought up to us pretty often. On a national level, if you read any number of studies, you'll see that actually affordable housing within any community really does not bring it down. However, that situation in southwest Florida is even -- is to a greater magnitude because of the makeup of how we live down here. The majority of neighborhoods down here in southwest Florida are gated communities that are kind of self-contained little nodes. And so when you look at property values from a property 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 appraiser's standpoint, they do not compare one neighborhood typically with another. You know, for someone that lives in Naples Reserve, for example, in Naples Reserve, there are a number of amenity packages within that community, just like Reflection Lakes, and a Habitat for Humanity community does not have that detailed of amenity package. On top of that, homes, let's say, in Naples Reserve, might be 2,800 to 3,200 square feet. Habitat for Humanity homes are typically somewhere in the 1,300, 1,200 to 1,500-square foot range. So you can't really compare apples to apples. And so when they do a market analysis and comparison by property appraiser, they don't really use -- they don't cross them. So a few more points, though, to that question. Number one, what Habitat for Humanity has done in the past, really about the past three or four years, we did realize that as we built in-fill lot sites, if we were to build a home and the cost to build that home is $70,000, and the house right next to it was a for-rate market neighborhood, market house that went for $300,000, that there was 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 21 that ability to potentially bring down that property value next door. So what we do now with every single one of our homes is we go out and hire a third-party, independent appraiser. They will go and give us a market value of that home and then we will sell that house at market value. Now, the next logical question is, well, wait a minute. Market value and affordability don't always go hand in hand. What we will do is because, typically, our costs are less than market value, we will sell it at a market value, and then that difference between actual cost and affordability and the market rate of that home that it was sold for will be covered by a silent second mortgage. And, really, what that's there to do is to prevent predatory lenders from coming in and telling people within our communities, hey, you've immediately grasped equity in your home, please refinance it at some rate, and then, you know, potentially lose your home because they can't afford that type of interest rate. The other thing it does as well is it really helps prevent anyone that goes through the really 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 22 detailed vetting process within a Habitat community from actually sneaking through and trying to take advantage of doing a quick flip on their home. We hold the mortgages, so we hold all those restrictions. MS. MONTGOMERY: Okay. So you've given us a lot of information. But the short answer is, is this going to have a negative impact on the property values? MR. KOULOHERAS: No, it will not. MS. MONTGOMERY: Okay. I heard you talk about financing and market rate. And some folks have the idea that this is free and people that get stuff for free don't take care of it. Can you answer how someone would acquire a Habitat home? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. So a Habitat applicant -- just so you know, last year alone, we received just under 2,000 inquiries for housing. We built about 110 homes last year Collier County-wide. So, you know, the vetting process is extremely detailed. So our typical Habitat or any Habitat family would go through not only criminal and background checks, they would be visited and personally 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 23 interviewed by a number of staff members and volunteers before that application eventually goes to our full board of directors for final review and approval. Now, once the family actually is approved for a home, the family has to come out to the job site if they're able to work on the job site, if not, we'll find other work for them to do, and work 500 hours of what we call sweat equity. So they will invest that time into building their home and their neighbor's home. And then the last kind of element of that is, like you said, Neale, most folks think that this is just a handout. Actually, every family that goes through the Habitat program has a mortgage with Habitat for Humanity. And that mortgage is paid off over, typically, between 20 to 30 years, depending on a number of different indicators. But they, every single month, have to physically walk into our office, whether it's here or up in our Immokalee office or North Naples office location, and hand us a mortgage payment. And in that mortgage payment is their escrows for their taxes, their property insurance, their HOA fees and obviously the mortgage payment itself. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 24 And then Habitat for Humanity then uses that money and puts it right back into our program services to do -- to build more housing down the road. MS. MONTGOMERY: I heard you say HOA fees. Homeowners associations usually monitor the maintenance and look of the community. Is there anything different here or is it like everybody else's HOA? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, so Habitat for Humanity, just a little background, we've been in Collier County now for 40 years, and the benefit of being around town for that long is we've been able to see mistakes that have been made in the past and we've been able to try to take corrective measures to address those mistakes that we feel we've made going forward. So one of those mistakes was within HOAs and the maintenance within those HOAs. And so what we have now decided to do, this is roughly three years or so ago, starting with our first neighborhood up in North Naples called Legacy Lakes, which is off Woodcrest Drive, not only common area maintenance, but all the front yard maintenance is done by a third-party landscaping firm. It is part of their 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 HOA dues. It is managed now by a professional property management company and that professional property moment company, along with a number of Habitat staff members that have been deployed to help police it, will now go and monitor the maintenance of our communities. On top of that, we've learned a lot from our HOA rules and regulations over the years, what's worked and what hasn't. And so our new HOA rules and regulations are unbelievably restrictive in what's allowed. And the problem with Habitat of years ago was that an HOA is a requirement by the State of Florida, and -- but it's only as good, as you folks know, as the people that are policing it within the HOA, whether that's your management company, whether that's your board of directors or just other residents. And so we've done a much better job of not only firming up those HOA documents, bringing in a third-party property management company that manages the property along with a third-party landscaping firm that's responsible for the maintenance, and on top of that we've started to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 educate our board of directors through a program and a leadership program to get them more apt to learning how to manage their own HOA. Last thing I will say on that, sorry for being long-winded, is that we've also recruited, and we encourage anyone, to help volunteer with it. So our Legacy Lakes project, which is up off of Immokalee Road, as I said, has a volunteer that goes out there three days a week. And that's another community liaison that walks the property, looks for any types of violations, gets to know the neighbors, gets to explain rules and regulations as he is walking around the neighborhood. So it's just another outreach program that we've tried to do in order to learn from some of our mistakes in the past. MS. MONTGOMERY: I know a lot of you live in gated communities, which usually means security is an issue for you. Nick, I heard you say that you vet your future prospective residents. So is security something that you look into before you work with someone in providing them a home? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, certainly. So part of that application process is Habitat families need 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 to go through an extensive criminal background check. That is anyone that is on the application that plans on residing in the home, as well as any future homeowner. You know, if someone is waiting for a family member to come over or someone, you know, down the road they have a baby and that -- we're not going to do a criminal check, obviously, on the baby, but all those same rules and regulations that apply within our deed restrictions apply to any person that lives within the home. So if there is a person with -- inside the confines of the home that is convicted of a felony, that is -- has the -- Habitat has the right to foreclose on that property. So there's a number of those restrictions that are written into Habitat mortgages that are not written into your typical mortgage through your typical bank. For better, for worse, there have been some bad apples in the barrel over the 40 years we've done this. We've had to exercise that right. Only about two or three times, but the good news is those documents, each time we've exercised it, actually it held up in the courts and we were able 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 to remove those families. MS. MONTGOMERY: I know that illegal immigration is an issue we hear a lot in the news, and some people are (indiscernible). Will there be illegal immigrants in this housing project? MR. KOULOHERAS: No. So another part of that vetting process is all Habitat family members or anyone that's on the application will go through an immigration screening. So everyone within a Habitat home has to either be a U.S. citizen or a legal resident of the United States, working towards their citizenship. MS. MONTGOMERY: We saw the site plan and it's kind of hard to see, but do you plan to have any walls or fences around the community or will you rely on the vegetative landscaping? MR. KOULOHERAS: That's a good question. We've had some of these conversations with some of our neighbors already. And what I'll say to that right now, as -- what is presented here tonight are the Collier County code requirements for what is required between adjoining property owners, depending on the use between property owners. So if this was a commercial site, for example, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 there would be a totally different landscaping buffer package that would be required versus a residential-to-residential site. Habitat for Humanity right now is actively researching and looking into cost associated and maintenance numbers with walls and fences and, unfortunately, right now, I don't have all those details. So those are conversations that we can certainly have as we continue this conversation after tonight with some of our HOAs out there, that are out here tonight. But I will say this. My initial estimates that I've come up with so far for walls that we've talked about run to the tune of about $600,00. So when we talk about affordability and long-term maintenance cost, we have to keep those types of things in mind as well. So this site right here, I know it said 116. The site design that we currently have laid out is 115. So you guys are -- you guys can do the math. It's $600,000 for 115 homes. You know, we're adding significant cost to the house as well. So those considerations are taken pretty seriously, but we are looking into those numbers and seeing if there's anything we can do to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 30 continue the conversations we've already started to have, I know, with Naples Reserve, with West Winds and Reflection Lakes. MS. MONTGOMERY: I want to ask you one last question. Statistically, they indicate that kids who grow up in a home do better in school and -- because they have a more stable environment. Is that what Habitat Collier County statistics show? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, of course. You know, it doesn't take a college professor to understand what safe, stable home ownership does for everybody in the family. Picture your child and you're moving every year or every other year or a couple times a year, constantly searching for the next place to live, constantly searching for the next place to feel safe and secure. And so we see and we've done studies, actually, with the Collier County School District, and we took student grades two years pre-moving into a Habitat home and two years post living in a Habitat home. And what we found was, I believe it was 16 percent increase in that time frame in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 31 reading scores and -- I'm sorry, 18 percent in reading? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: 16 in reading and 8 in math. MR. KOULOHERAS: Oh, 16 in reading and 8 percent in math. So, I mean, as you guys all know, we've all been through some level of schooling, and it's a nice feeling being able to come home to a home every day, sit down in your room where you feel safe and secure and know that you can study without worries of other activities that might have happened in or around where you previously lived. And, on top of that, establishing those roots within that community as a network to help feed off one another and to help one another out. MS. MONTGOMERY: Thank you. I want to ask Laura Herrero a question. Laura mentioned that the site had 25 percent exotics. Sometimes people go, what's an exotic? MS. HERRERO: Oh, sorry. You know, we get used to -- we know what we mean. The exotic vegetation. There's a lot of melaleuca, things like Australian pine, Brazilian pepper. Those are the ones that -- ear-leaf acacia is another one, those are the ones that are 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 32 prevalent here. The Brazilian pepper makes a real dense understory, makes it difficult to walk through. And per Collier County codes, those are actually to be removed. Those -- the preserve area that will remain, all of the exotics will be removed from that preserve as well. MS. MONTGOMERY: So it will be healthier preserve, healthier vegetation? MS. HERRERO: Absolutely. MS. MONTGOMERY: Okay. Thank you. I have a question for Laura DeJohn. You mentioned several times that Collier County incentivizes affording housing. A lot of folks may be wondering why. MS. DeJOHN: Well, there's two reasons why. One is because, by Florida statute, every local government must accommodate and address how people of all income levels and backgrounds can live in the community. So it's a statutory requirement, number one, to have plans in place and programs in place to ensure that any level of the community gets served within the community with a safe and decent place to live. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 33 Secondarily, then, Collier County's Growth Management Plan that is that foundation for how the community will grow has a housing element. And the housing element is what enforces and implements those statutory requirements for providing safe, decent and affordable housing in every community. And the Collier County housing element is crafted with certain provisions and solutions for how to provide that housing within the community. Some of those solutions include working with non-profits that are in the community on the provision of affordable housing and creating the opportunity for the balancing of those economics by allowing the higher density -- higher densities on land. The more development that can occur on the land, the more affordable it is for the end user. That -- again, that density incentive or the ability to increase density goes up to 16 units per acre in Collier County. Habitat's pattern to kind of blend in the community and be more single-family style housing, Habitat's pattern has been at the five-unit per acre level. MS. MONTGOMERY: Thank you. I need your help now. I know you all have questions. Collier County wants a good record of the proceedings. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 34 So I want you to come up and ask questions, but I want us to respect everyone who speaks so we can get a good record of what you say and not talk over people because we want Collier County to know exactly what each one of you has to say. So if you would, those who have questions, we have two mikes here. You can come up and the appropriate person on the team will respond. MR. KLUUG: William Kluug (phonetic). 92 -- MS. MONTGOMERY: I forgot. You have to (indiscernible) you have to put your name on the record so we know who you are. I forgot. MR. KLUUG: Okay. The children that would reside in this proposed development would -- (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Neale, you can restate the question for everybody else. MS. MONTGOMERY: No. That goes to the (indiscernible). I'll repeat your question. So his question is, the children that live in the community -- MR. KLUUG: Would attend school where? MS. MONTGOMERY: Would attend school where? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yep. So the question was 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 35 where would the children within this community attend school. Right now, if they choose the public school option they would go to Manatee, more than likely, Manatee Middle, Manatee Elementary, then Lely High School. MR. KLUUG: Fine. With respect to this proposed development, has there been any discussion with the school district regarding the impact on enrollment? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. That's a great question. So the question was, with the development of this community, has there been a discussion with the school district as far as impacting enrollment. So to answer your question, the answer is yes. The way the Collier County planning process works is any community, with a residential planned community, as this one, has -- goes to Collier County School District for their review as well. They have a seat at the table, if you will. So they know what's coming down the road and how to plan. This community that's proposed, if approved, the soonest we would be building in here is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 36 probably three years from now. And so when we sit down, we take it to the next level than a lot of developers. We'll sit down with actually Collier County schools, and because we do have -- we know we have a lot of children that live within our neighborhood, we will sit down with them as we get closer to that and we will give them estimated projections of not only students' ages, but also what grades they would be coming into, depending on their closing schedule. So that way they're able to -- the school is able to accommodate the needs. And then, you know, they did it a lot back in the early 2000 range, you know, the last-ditch effort the school goes to is building future sites. And to be perfectly honest, speaking to my colleagues, if you will, the folks I know over at the school district, growth in Collier County is really three areas. It's in Golden Gate Estates. It's out Immokalee Road. And it's down the East Trail. And so the school district is well aware of that and is already planning on future school sites that will go down there. I'm not sure when they would build them, but -- MR. KLUUG: Have you had discussion with this 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 37 proposed development in conjunction with the ARGO (phonetic) residential development that's going to take place directly across from (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: We can't hear (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: We want to hear all people speaking. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. Well, thank you, sir. And what the problem was is that this mike has to go to a recording device, and for some reason, it's not picking up the (indiscernible) mike. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MR. KOULOHERAS: So we'll get that taken care of. MR. KLUUG: The question is, has there been any discussion with the school district relating to this proposed development in conjunction with the ARGO residential development (indiscernible) opposite the school (indiscernible) Manatee (indiscernible) affordable housing development and what the impact of all these children is going to be on the enrollment level at both the elementary and middle schools, particularly when you take into account its (indiscernible) utilization capacity is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 38 at those schools, understand (indiscernible) additional children coming to these schools, has that been taken into consideration? MR. KOULOHERAS: So to answer your question specifically about conversations between Habitat for Humanity and ARGOS Development, no, Habitat for Humanity has not talked to ARGOS about their development patterns and what their proposals are. However, just like Habitat for Humanity, their development would have to go through all the same processes that this development has to go through. So when the school district looks at district lines and district areas, they are well aware in advance of what those development patterns are going to look like. MR. KLUUG: Well, I beg to differ. I'm not so sure that -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, there's a gentleman from Collier County staff here. Maybe he could help us answer that question. MR. SABO: James Sabo, Collier County. What the school district does is anticipates growth in the school system. And if there is growth, then they accommodate that growth however they feel they need to. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 39 Collier County government, the Board of County Commissioners, doesn't really directly have control over the school. They're a separate entity. MR. KLUUG: Okay. (Indiscernible) between Manatee (indiscernible) development and now this. The capacity at the schools, kids present (indiscernible) school (indiscernible) is going to be far exceeded. I'm not so sure that particular issue has (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. MS. MONTGOMERY: You have to come and speak into the microphone. Come on up. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. We'll give you the microphone that goes into the big speakers because I believe that one, as well, is just tied into the auto recording. MS. MONTGOMERY: (Indiscernible) for the record now so we can hear. MS. YOUNG: Oh, okay. Thank you. My name is Pat Young. I'm a resident of Collier County and I'm very interested in the Collier County schools. This sort of piggybacks on what the gentleman was just asking. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MS. YOUNG: Okay. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 40 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes, the one in your hand is the one that's (indiscernible). MS. YOUNG: Okay. Can you hear me now? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes. MS. YOUNG: Okay. School question. A little different than the one before mine. Right now -- you had not mentioned the requirement, income requirements for people purchasing a home in Habitat. I know that there are some requirements in that regard. But right now, and we're talking about Manatee School, because that is the school that would suit this area right now, right now, Manatee School has over -- close to 95 percent economically disadvantaged students. And what you said earlier about the improvement in a student's work when they get a stable family home is, yes, incredibly important. But also all the newest studies are showing that not having an economically mixed and diverse student body also affects a student's work in the school. So I don't know what the income levels are that you require for your program, but right now, we need to take a look at what the school looks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 41 like and how Habitat's community would also affect it in that way. Definitely, we need more room. Maybe another school. There are already about six temporary classrooms in the parking lot over there. So I would hope that Habitat will address the issue of trying to create some kind of economic diversity. I mean, all the kids are wonderful no matter what their financial levels are. The teachers are great, but putting all these kinds in the same school has been shown to be detrimental to improvement, and we want to stop the cycle of poverty any way we can and that would be one of the ways to do that. So I do hope that somehow this discussion comes up. And it's not just at Manatee School. It's in many different places throughout East Naples because of the number of affordable housing units that we have. They're not spread equally throughout the county, which I think would be the ideal. And let me think if there was anything else that I wanted to say about that. No, I guess that's pretty much it. I would hope that that's going to be a consideration. For 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 42 the last 20 years, all the studies are showing this and we have not made a lot of progress. Now I remember what I wanted to say. It's not -- the school populations of this type where they're economically disadvantaged are in 90 percent are all here in -- most of them are here in East Naples. I shouldn't say all of them. So we are creating a situation here which is unique and it's good that we have all these houses for people. I appreciate that. I, myself, grew up in a very impoverished area. I know what it's like. And so I hope that this is going to be addressed. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. Thank you for your comments. And just -- you know, I'm a firm believer as well that the more racially and economically diverse any school could be or any community could be, the better that school, the better that community would fare well. I did have some -- ran some statistics that may address some of that. And we ran these statistics from 2012. The reason I picked 2012 is because we can make the argument that that's when 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 43 everyone was officially saying we came out of the recess, although most people didn't see that probably till 2015, but 2012 is what they say, until our most recent statistical year, which was obviously last year, 2017. In East Naples, 4,121 single family and multi-family building permits were pulled in that time frame. Of those 4,121 building permits pulled, Habitat for Humanity of Collier County in East Naples pulled 160. That is .035 percent. So when we look at communities and the amount of growth that's happening within this community, I'm hoping that statistic alone will show that those numbers might start to sway a little bit in the other direction. So the other thing to just touch on schools as well is Collier County impact fees, you know, we all know them, we all know we have to pay them. The Collier County impact fee on the fee schedule, from every fee that we've ever paid, is the highest of all the different fees. And so whether you live in Naples Reserve, Reflection Lakes, West Winds, Habitat, you pay the Collier County school impact fee and that's to help offset the cost of those future developments. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 44 Now, there's a deferral program in Collier County, so Habitat does have some of its impact fees waived, but not all of them. But thank you. It was a good point. Thank you for you -- MS. LEFKOW: Nick, I'd like to -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Oh, sure. MS. LEFKOW: Can I just say one thing? MR. KOULOHERAS: Of course. Come up to here. MS. LEFKOW: Sorry. Lisa Lefkow. I'm the CEO of Habitat. And I want to just respond to the education levels. I had the privilege of attending Lely's high school graduation ceremonies last week where nearly a third of the scholarship and high honors recipients were Habitat families, including the one graduate from Lely that has been accepted at West Point. So I think that -- I would hope that that gives you a great deal of confidence that what happens inside Habitat homes is that families become actively engaged in their student's education. The education level rises and we have students that excel. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: You have another 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 45 question? DR. CONFUSIONE: Yes. Hi. My name is Dr. Michael Confusione. I live in Naples Reserve. And I find it wonderful that Habitat has been around for so long and that you've learned from some of your mistakes. However, in your presentation, you kind of micro spoked in on the mistakes that Habitat made within its own community area within Habitat for Humanity housing. From what I understand, the one mistake that you haven't looked at that I think has been written about several times is the saturation, not in Collier County, but the saturation in East Naples, specifically, that we are off balance, so to speak. And I think you need to address the saturation point at this meeting and what's going to happen when you're doubling the size of an already existing Habitat development, one. Two, the impact of leaving the area -- I think the county planning has to address the fact that this is a junction for Marco Island. Putting another 150 homes in the junction of 41 and Collier -- Collier Boulevard can be very damaging if we have fires, if we have whatever that's a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 46 catastrophe, hurricane, like last year. There were traffic jams. How would I ever get to 75 if another 150, perhaps 300 cars on the road, because every family has two cars. If we take the average of every family having two children, we now have the need for 30 new classrooms on the 150 times two, 300 children in the classroom. At 30 kids per classroom, that's ten new classrooms. I see that as a wash in terms of all the tax money that the county might get from this development. And, number four, if you look up definition of preserve in Webster's Dictionary, it says not being destroyed. Now, we were told, and maybe this is just a criticism of -- because I come from Brooklyn. And we adhere to Webster's Dictionary. However, maybe your language in southwest Florida is different. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). DR. CONFUSIONE: Okay. So if you're going to use the term "preserve," as it was, I have an issue with iStar (phonetic) and my homeowners and Naples Reserve have an issue, when they tell us this is all preserve, we think that strip of land is a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 47 preserve and couldn't be touched because it means not for destruction. Now, here I hear an awful lot about the preserve border or preserve meaning a border that you're going to leave. That's not a preserve. It can be taken down anytime. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Actually, it can't (indiscernible). DR. CONFUSIONE: It can't be built on, but it can be taken down anytime, no? Okay. Well, I think it would be better to use buffer when we're referring to land that you're going to develop, because it seems a little deceptive that this was presented to -- from Naples Reserve to Reflection Lakes and from the information that I got when I went into the clubhouse of Naples Reserve that this was preserve. That's not your issue. I just think, for future reference, if you're going to correct your errors, so to speak, as you presented very well, but like I said, not addressing saturation, that the word "preserve" is -- has different meanings, and it should be clear what that meaning is. MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, thank you. Thank you -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 48 MS. MONTGOMERY: Hang on. Let me just -- one, let me address traffic. We have to do a traffic impact statement in accordance with the county rules. So that will, in fact, be done. Two, Fair Housing Act, you can't discriminate against affordable housing and you can't -- it's allowed to be anywhere within the county and goes back to what my question to Laura DeJohn was, the county has an obligation to incentivize affordable housing. Preserves. Preserves are -- I'm from outside Philadelphia, so I know what its common meaning is, but when it comes to land use, you have to look at the land use regulations as those terms were defined. Buffers are specifically defined one way. Preserves another. We'll be consistent with those codes. Do we have any other questions? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Thank you. I'm a retired educator from Broward County schools on the east coast of Florida. I escaped that coast in 2004 to come over here. I have family down on Marco Island. I'm very, very glad that I did escape and I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 49 just want to mention about, from an educational standpoint, I was a high school guidance counselor in the City of Coral Springs. Now, just as a frame of reference here for all of you in terms of what we're dealing with here. I spent 33 years living in Broward County. I watched Broward County develop into a nightmare. The City of Coral Springs started out as a Westinghouse community in the early '70s. It grew and grew. In the beginning, it was a lovely community. I went first from Fort Lauderdale High School, where I started teaching in Broward. Two years there. Within about seven years after I left, I went to Coral Springs. Fort Lauderdale High School had deteriorated. And believe me, we had a nice, wonderful diversity in that school, a lot of students from Las Olas Boulevard. Las Olas in Fort Lauderdale was considered quite an affluent area also. So I went to Coral Springs. I was transferred to Coral Springs. I lived in Pompano Beach at Lighthouse Point for most of those years. Coral Springs, as I said, started out as a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 50 Westinghouse community. It was going to be all solar homes. It was going to be the answer to Florida. And I started at Coral Springs High School. I spent six years there and then I was sent over to J.P. Taravella High School in the south end of Coral Springs. And, by the way, I was not far from Parkland. Knew Parkland extremely well. Saw that community get developed. It's still considered a fairly nice community over on the east coast. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes, I will, but I have a right to speak. So what I want you all to understand is that what you're dealing with here in terms of education and also in terms of overpopulation. It needs to stop, because what you're going to get here within the next eight to ten years, and it's already happening, is another Broward County. So my question here, and I favor -- I think what Habitat for Humanity does is an incredible job. I certainly welcome you, but when is this going to stop? You're part of it. I wish Donna Fiala was here. I met Donna 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 51 Fiala. MR. KOULOHERAS: She -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: She's right here. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Oh. Hi. I met you down in Coral Springs some years ago and also at Reflection Lakes. And you have been the answer to our prayers here. I'm very disturbed about seeing the growth here. Where I'm going to escape next, I have no idea. But I really feel, again, as a retired educator, this is not good. It's not good for any communities. It's not good to blow this population off to the extent that you have in Miami Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties and the schools over there have deteriorated, and believe me, it's out of control. So what are you going to do to really curb what needs to be curbed here. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. So, you know, it's an excellent question, and the only thing -- I guess the only thing I can really say about it is there's growth patterns within Collier County. There's a growth management plan within Collier County. And those growth patterns are dictated by not only market demand, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 52 but also by government regulations on where growth can happen. The area of East Trial, if you will, from 951 out to, essentially, the Everglades, the Fakahatchee Strand, I believe is the first one there that you come to, is part of an area called the rural fringe mixed use district. There is roughly, and please don't quote me on this number, but over the next 15 to 20 years, they're saying there's roughly about 20,000 more homesites coming to this area of town. And, once again, please don't quote me on that number. I can tell you right now, with the current land holdings that Habitat for Humanity has at its current zoning, we make up 346 of those. So, now, ten years from now, will we be back here, five years from now, to have another neighborhood information meeting to see if we can increase density within the community? I'm going to tell you probably yes. All right. But as it sits right now on our books, that's what we have. So we talked about growth. We talked about growth patterns. Collier County has an estimated build-out 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 53 population of a million people. Currently, right now, there's 360 or so thousand full-time residents in Collier County. So what are we going to do about it? Well, we're going to try to do smart planning, working with the county, work with county officials, work with neighbors to make sure we develop communities that are the best communities that we can develop. You know, I wish some other builders were in here because I would ask the same question of Neal Communities. I'd ask the same question of iStar. I'd ask the same question of D.R. Horton. I'd ask the same question of all of them because it's not just Habitat that is building homes. As you heard me say earlier, from 2012 to 2017, 4,124 building permits pulled in East Naples. Habitat pulled 160 of those. So, statistically, we're -- my favorite word, almost de minimis when it comes to that population growth. So I know I didn't give you -- I might not have given you a great answer, but just telling you, someone that's been in the land development business here in Collier County for 15 years, I'm just telling you what's -- what's coming down the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 54 road and what Habitat's role is or what's Habitat impact overall for those communities. MS. MONTGOMERY: Well, let me have a follow-up question to that. Is Habitat inviting people to move here from Broward and other counties or is Habitat trying to meet a need that already exists in the community? MR. KOULOHERAS: So that's actually an excellent question. So Habitat for Humanity of Collier County has a policy that in order to even apply for a Habitat home you either have to have lived in Collier County for a minimum of one year or you have to have a vested interest in Collier County. Vested interest meaning you might only be able to afford to live in Lehigh Acres, but you are a nurse at NCH and you commute every single day and you commute primarily because you can't afford to live within the Collier County border. So you have to have either that vested interest or lived here for a minimum of 12 months. You cannot just come over, have a residency of whatever, you know, street in Miami Dade and apply for a home over here in Collier County. We won't even accept the application. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 55 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Do we have any other questions? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I have two. I think this is -- okay. All right. I got it. I have two questions, basically. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: In looking at the street that goes in off of Greenway, there are about 26 homes, I think, 27. MR. KOULOHERAS: On Greenway Road? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: No. On -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Oh, Majestic Circle? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Majestic Circle. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So, again, somebody was talking about traffic. Somebody said the traffic plan hasn't been done yet. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. Because now you're talking about the same 300 cars, 7 percent of which are all going to try to leave between 7 and 8:00 in the morning on a two-lane street. MR. KOULOHERAS: I know you said I have two questions. Let me answer the first one first, if I could. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 56 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, that's one question. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. So as Neale said here, our development has to do a traffic impact statement. And actually -- is that officially done yet, Jared? MR. BROWN: It's in the process. MR. KOULOHERAS: It's in the process of being wrapped up. So they use FDOT standards on what is allowed, what's not allowed, what's a failing road, what's a passing road. And so any improvements that would need to be made to Greenway Road or even -- I mean, you can't just take that one road segment. When we -- when they do this traffic impact statement, it looks at traffic flows on 41. It looks at traffic flows all the way down, really, to the 41/951 intersection. And so right now the traffic engineers are telling us that there is no significant road impact as far as timing delays and all those things. I will agree with you, most people go to work between 7 and 8:30, and if there's 100 more homes there, then there's going to be 100 more cars. That's not -- I would never try to argue that, but 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 57 what they're saying within these -- within these detailed analysis of the levels of service will tell us what that impact to the roads are. Initially, the onset is that it doesn't have a significant impact. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I understand. I'm more worried about the impact to your community. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. So we've had, actually, a public meeting with our community as well, because they have their concerns as well. They say, hey, what are you going to do about cars that drive in and out of our neighborhood, are you going to put in speed bumps. So they have their concerns as well and we met with them last week and we're addressing some of their concerns, too. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) develop (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, so that's a very good point. When -- I believe Laura mentioned earlier, when we purchased the land that Regal 1 sits on, not too long after, we purchased about half of the land that the proposed Regal II sits on. So all of those initial studies from water/sewer service availability to road impacts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 58 were all kind of considered at that point in time. That's why you heard, I believe, Jared say, our project engineer, that Habitat for Humanity, at that particular moment in time, prepaid traffic impact fees. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. The second question is for ecology. You have -- you have (indiscernible) wading birds up there, but what about the deer? Are you going to plant a lot of schefflera back there so they will eat yours and not mine? There's like 10 to 12 deer back there. There's a 12-point buck back there. MS. HERRERO: Oh, is there? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Absolutely. They're over on our property eating our schefflera and our hibiscus and everything else. MS. HERRERO: You know, we will address, through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Collier County codes, whatever management plans we need to do. We just kind of listed two of them up there that we know would be needed for sure during the development process. The deer are not a listed species. They're not a protected species. So, generally, we don't have management plans for them. You know, they try 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 59 to control the populations with different hunting and things. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Oh, so we can get a hunting permit for them? MS. HERRERO: Maybe not in your backyard. Maybe not in your backyard, but -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, that's where he is. MS. HERRERO: Yeah. Sorry. MR. PARKHURST: I'm (indiscernible) Parkhurst (phonetic), Naples Reserve. I was just talking to this nice lady here. We're talking about parcel B. And when you initially showed this, you had single-family units up there, correct, on the -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, on the new proposed site. MR. PARKHURST: Right. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, sir. MR. PARKHURST: But I'm reading down through here. It says that also includes two-family duplex units, attached dwellings, including townhouses and also multiple family dwelling units. I'm confused. MR. KOULOHERAS: So, I mean, maybe it's a question for Laura to answer, but -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 60 MS. DeJOHN: What you're reading from is the handout that was at the front desk and I want to make sure anyone who didn't get a chance to get it, there's a list of the permitted uses within the Regal Acres proposed development and a list of permitted uses within the current exiting agriculture zoning district so you can have information and basis for understanding of what the agricultural uses are that are currently allowed on the property and what the proposed uses are per the Regal Acres planned unit development proposal. That is a standard list of residential uses that falls within the residential planned unit development parameters. It's standard, basically, for every community out there. There's a list of multi-family units in Reflection Lakes, for example. And what Habitat has proposed and is deciding in going forward with permitting on is the single-family model, but it's -- MR. PARKHURST: Do we have your word these are going to be single-family units? MS. DeJOHN: That would be Nick's word if -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Sir, I will say this. There's nothing of an indicator that we would 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 61 change that. We've actually already started to design plans. The way the renderings came was not a cropped photo. Those renderings came directly from architectural plans that we've started to work on. What changes a lot of the stuff for any developer, just to let you know, is really the -- when it comes to affordability. So we talk about things like adding a $600,000 wall. Okay. Well, if that adds $6,000, roughly, let's say, to every home, is that still affordable? And, in which case, well, maybe the answer is really we need 120 homes, you know. So we're not asking for that, but that's how developers, you know, make their numbers work. Right now, everything that we have laid out, everything we have on our website, everything we've discussed, Lisa and myself, with family services, has all been a single-family, detached, two-story home. MR. PARKHURST: There's nothing in black and white that says this is what they're going to be. You may end up putting multi-family townhouses in there? MR. KOULOHERAS: I never want to say never, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 62 but I'm going to tell you right now the likelihood of that happening is almost zero. MR. PARKHURST: There's no way that you can put black and white in here that these will be single-family homes. MS. LEFKOW: So what we're asking for is -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Go ahead. I'm sorry. I need you to come up, though, so everyone can hear you. MS. LEFKOW: So what we're asking for is the change in the zoning. So the zoning overlay, the zoning that Laura just spoke about is the RPUD. So that's the description here. We're talking about a project that's not going to be built for three years. So there's a lot that is -- (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MS. LEFKOW: Look, friends, I'm going to tell you right now, I can't tell you what's going to happen in three years. You don't know what's going to happen in your neighborhood in three years, but I can tell you there's no sense in us going as far as we have gone to project and to propose this neighborhood, we've made significant investment here, if this was not our end game. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 63 all of our (indiscernible). MS. LEFKOW: It is our -- it is our absolute desire and this is the direction that we believe will be both the best for our families as well as for the surrounding neighborhoods, too. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MS. LEFKOW: We've heard your -- we've heard your request to build a wall. Absolutely. You've heard Nick tell you that we are -- (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MS. LEFKOW: Friends, in order for us to have a transcript of this meeting, we can't all talk at once. So we have heard your concern about a wall. We are working to develop the cost and the model for that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: We don't want a wall. We don't want it built at all. MS. LEFKOW: So I hear that as well. And that breaks my heart. I'm sorry that you feel that way. But, friends, we're not -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: You're breaking our hearts, too. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MS. LEFKOW: We're here to -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 64 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) our wallets. MR. KOULOHERAS: Folks, let us remind you, if you have a question or you have something to say, it is imperative that you come up and speak up here. I'm not going to allow yelling back and forth. Okay? I think we're all adults here and we're all civilized. If you'd like something to say, please come up and that way also we have a formal record on it down the road in case I did promise something or there are concerns from the neighbors that we try to adjust or try to accommodate. MR. RAKESTRAW: Thank you. My name is Russ Rakestraw (phonetic). I live in Reflection Lakes. And I just -- I don't -- I don't really have any specific questions, but I want to share some information with you. First of all, statistics. We've heard all kinds of wonderful statistics tonight how this development's going to be the greatest thing since canned beer. A fellow told me many years ago, try to convince a family member of a person that's just been killed in an airplane crash that air travel is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 65 the safest form of transportation. Statistics mean nothing. And they don't mean a whole lot to the people. Look at what's going on in Marco Island. There's statistic out that the wazoo that says they don't need another ambulance. Well, they're on the verge of getting one because they want one and they don't give a rat's behind about the statistics. What I'm telling you is that these people here tonight, you all put on a pretty slick presentation, but it ain't -- nobody's buying it. Well, I can't speak for everybody, but most people's not buying it. And that's what you need to understand. This fight is not over. You guys can be smug and, you know, come all dressed up and put on your presentation. That's fine. But we're going to fight as long as we can to keep this from happening. You tell the people that live on Manchester now that have people from Habit (sic) -- teenagers from Habit from Humanity jump the fence and come through that yard, their yard, going where? There's no place for them to go. So what's up with that? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 66 Those are the people you're talking to, and I think you need to know that. I believe you're sincere. As a rule, I think Habitat for Humanity's a good program. I don't think it's a good program for our neighborhood. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. MR. KIRSCHOFF: My name is Steve Kirschoff (phonetic). I just relocated down to Florida recently. We're also in the Naples Reserve. And what -- I'm not familiar with Habitat for Humanity, because where I came from, I'm not aware of the work. So I'll just say this because the -- my -- I think probably a common perception would be affordable housing -- I guess here's what I'm going to ask. You mentioned earlier you're not going -- you can't discriminate. You have to build the housing in the county. I understand that. The question is, what's the saturation level? How much of that is already here? We're not talking about just the new development. We're talking about what already exists compared to the other areas. I mean, I have -- none of us, I don't think, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 67 are against affordable housing. The question is, are you clustering it all in one area and -- or too much of it in one area, we'll say? The other question I have, because I am not familiar with the statistics, is what is the impact to the crime rate, not only in the existing community, but in the surrounding communities when Habitats are expanded or created? Because I'm not aware of it and I would like to know. MR. KOULOHERAS: Sure. So to answer your question about criminal activity. I don't believe we have anyone from the Sheriff's Department here tonight. But I will say this. Criminal activity, if you were to go even to Collier County Sheriff's Department website, they have a map that you can zoom into, and it shows you the calls and what they were within different communities. So you can zoom into Reflection Lakes, Naples Reserve, Habitat for Humanity, Fiddler's Creek, wherever you want to go. And I will say this. The calls, the way I read it, I'm not a sheriff, so there's no significant impact in criminal rates when it comes to a Habitat community. We had a public information meeting about two years ago. Some of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 68 you might have even been there, where two members from the Sheriff's Department actually came in unsolicited and made that same statement. So do I have the police report with me right now? No, sir, I do not, but I can tell you from what I've heard from our colleagues or our friends in the Sheriff's Department that, you know, tell us anything that we need to be made aware of, they will not, the best to my knowledge, at least they haven't in the past, said that because a Habitat neighborhood has come into a community that crime rates and statistics have gone up. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) that we have (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: That's good. So, also, within every one of our communities, we've designated a home for a member of law enforcement, and that's really our way of helping out with the community. Law enforcement members, along with teachers, nurses, the whole likes, they all struggle very much so to find housing that's affordable in Collier County. And so even though our charter, if you will, doesn't allow us to help out folks making more than 80 percent of the area median income, and just so 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 69 you know, the area median income right now is $75,000, our board did allow us to put essentially a rental home inside every one of our communities for a member of law enforcement to just help them, you know, be able to save and move on and still live in the county where they work. As far as oversaturation is concerned, the county has 1,000 different statistics, if you will, to say -- you know, they go by commissioner's district maps, they go by regional planning maps, and I know we just heard that statistics don't mean much. So all I can tell you is that when it comes to Habitat for Humanity, we have, in East Naples, if you will, and I use East Naples, what I mean by that is not Commissioner Fiala's voting district, I go by the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District or the foundation district as kind of the generic version of East Naples, pretty much from Bayshore East, Marco Island north of the highway, for the most part. Habitat for Humanity, in its 40 years, has roughly built, I believe the number in East Naples is about 1,000 homes. I don't know how many homes are in East Naples, but I can tell you the number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 70 is probably upwards of 30, 40 or 50,000 homes. So if there is a saturation issue within East Naples, I don't believe anyone here could sit there and make the argument that Habitat built 1,000 of -- let's say the number is even 20,000 homes -- that that constitutes oversaturation. So there may be oversaturation. There may be homes that are deemed affordable price points and stuff like that, but that issue has not been caused by Habitat for Humanity's efforts. In fact, all we've really helped do is you got to remember the folks, years ago, it was farmworkers that needed housing. You drive out to Legacy Lakes off Woodcrest Drive off Immokalee Road, I encourage you all to do that, that's our latest community, our last resident moved in about 18 months ago. First house on the right, that person is a banker. Third house down on right, that person works for the school district. Fourth house down on the left, they work for Collier County government. So these are the folks that live and work amongst us. These are the folks that work at your clubhouses. These might even be, you know, some of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 71 your golf course superintendents. And so I just want to put a face on that as well that, you know -- like I said, I'm from Massachusetts, I'm from Boston, and I'm from specifically a town called Lowell, Massachusetts. It's a mill town. And I remember what Section 8 housing up there looked like. And Section 8 housing, compared to what Habitat for Humanity does, two totally different beasts, totally different beasts. Now, like I said, we're talking about people -- when you go into Bank of America and see your banker, you don't think, oh, they need affordable housing to live here in Collier County. At least I didn't when I moved down here. So just one other little point. The median sales point for a home in Collier County is roughly $380,000. Do we have any realtors in the room that could confirm that? If you use that kind of general rule of three, right, 30 percent, that means you have to make six figures to afford a house in Collier County. I don't know where all of you are from, but six figures where I'm from was a damn good salary, and it's a damn good salary down here. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 72 So the issue is only growing and Habitat for Humanity does not address that other income bracket. And I truly wish someone did. When we go talk to developers, I hope they did -- the county has a housing plan. Some of it's good. Some of it's not so good. But those are the incentives that we need to help create to help developers try to get into this market, because I'll tell you what's going to happen. I'm sorry I'm going off subject here. But I'll tell you what's going to happen if there are no incentives for developers. Nothing. And then the only thing they can look at is market price -- lot prices, and say they'll continue to build housing where it's most economically viable for them, which depends on where you live right now, there's some decent lot prices in East Naples. So we have to help work with each other to help create these incentives to bring folks in so we can build in North Naples. We're actually looking at property right now in North Naples. Our last project we built was in North Naples. I said earlier 160 permits Habitat pulled from 2012 to 2017 in East Naples. We pulled -- where's 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 73 my map -- 284 outside of East Naples in the past five years. So I'm not saying everything we build is not going to be in East Naples. You'll never hear me say that, but I just want to tell you guys where kind of these things are going. There was a woman over here. Thank you. MS. WALKER: My name is Linda Walker, and I live over in West Wind. I bought my home in 2002 and retired in 2006 to come down here and live. When I bought my place, I knew that I would live to see it not be in the country any longer, but when I looked at the fact that this was an agricultural, I forget the term, zoned area, I thought, okay, they'll be building houses in some of these places, but down the Greenway, no. I'll live to see it not be country any longer. I figured it would take 20, 25 years. Within ten years, Reflections Lake came into being. So you all are off my charts. Fiddler's Creek came into being. You all are off my charts. It's just like everybody wants to shut the gate behind themselves. And we're sitting here in a church, and my heart was sitting back there breaking to hear people not wanting other people to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 74 have a chance to live in this beautiful place. And I'm just really sorry to have to say that I don't think you all are right. They need to have places for people who work here to live here. I know some of the people who live in Regal Acres. Oh, wonderful people. They're good neighbors. And I just can't see how hard hearted what I'm hearing here tonight. It breaks my heart. MS. PENTON: Hi. My name is Kathy Penton (phonetic). I'm a resident at Naples Reserve. I have a couple of questions. First off, I'd like to refer to this affordable housing meeting on May 7 here in Collier County. And one of the items of topics was new Habitat project going in near Greenway across from Fiddler's with 1,000 units. Can you comment on that, care to? MR. KOULOHERAS: Can you tell me where that's coming from, ma'am? MS. PENTON: It's coming from -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Because -- MS. PENTON: Collier County's Affordable Housing Advisory Committee. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. Well, I will tell you right now, Habitat for Humanity doesn't have 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 75 anything out there for 1,000 units. Habitat for Humanity owns no raw land on the southern side of U.S. 41. I believe what that's referencing is that potential Manatee site that was put out to request for information to see what developers would be interested in coming in and building some type of affordable housing. But from the best of my knowledge, and maybe Commissioner Fiala could ask -- if she knows something -- more update than I do, I'm sure she knows a lot more than I do, but the county hasn't made a determination on what's going to happen with that land. They have not put it out -- MS. PENTON: With what land? I thought you didn't own any. You said -- MR. KOULOHERAS: No, no, the Manatee land site. MS. PENTON: Oh, the Manatee. MR. KOULOHERAS: So I believe that's -- MS. PENTON: (Indiscernible) Greenway. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. No. Greenway Road, absolutely. I'll tell you what we own on Greenway Road. I mean, it's public record. We own this section of Regal II. And then if 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 76 you go up Greenway Road and take a right on Fritchey Road and you go out a mile east on Fritchey Road, it dead ends into acreage that Habitat for Humanity owns out there. And that's -- MS. PENTON: And how much is that acreage that you own there? MR. KOULOHERAS: At its current zoning that we could -- to answer your question specifically, it's 93 acres. At its current zoning, Habitat for Humanity could build one unit per five acres on that land. So the quick math is roughly 18 units. Now, I'm going to tell you right now, that's not the best use of the land. So Habitat for Humanity, sometime down the road, three, five, seven years, might come in and ask for a zoning change, but 1,000 units, I don't know of a single property in all of Collier County that has that type of density. MS. PENTON: That's why I'm questioning it. MR. KOULOHERAS: That would be 11 units an acre. MS. PENTON: Get an education, people. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, it certainly isn't us. MS. PENTON: Okay. Now, in addition -- I have several questions. I'm sorry. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 77 MR. KOULOHERAS: That's okay. MS. PENTON: You stated that we -- you own 346 acres right now of Habitat property. MR. KOULOHERAS: No. It's roughly 346 approved units. MS. PENTON: Oh, units. Okay. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. MS. PENTON: Because are you familiar with the study that was done by Dr. Porto (phonetic) who claims that there's 150 acres of undeveloped property that could potentially add 2,000 additional housing units here in East Naples? MR. KOULOHERAS: From Habitat for Humanity? MS. PENTON: From Habitat. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. So I will tell you exactly our landholdings in the East Naples area. You have this project right here, which is 23 proposed acres, undeveloped, raw land. You have the 93 acres I just talked about, and then there's one other parcel that Habitat owns that is 84 acres, which is out closer to the Links of Naples, which is a little bit further east on the East Trail out by 6L Farms. MS. PENTON: And you're planning to put all Habitat housing in these communities, which is the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 78 41 Trail, correct? So we talk about saturation. I just want the people to know the potential of what exists for all of us going towards Alligator Alley. We'll soon be calling it Habitat Alley. MR. KOULOHERAS: Ma'am, I -- usually, I'm pretty good at just letting people talk, but where I'm going to 100 percent disagree with you, what is your definition of oversaturation? Because I just told you -- MS. PENTON: Over -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Hold on a second. I just told you Habitat for Humanity, how many acres we own and how many approved units we own compared to the 20 or so thousand future units that have come down the East Trail. So if we make up even 1,000 of those, that's oversaturation? MS. PENTON: I'm not an expert, and I don't claim to be an expert. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. Well, I'm just wondering because you're telling me it's oversaturated. I want to understand your -- MS. PENTON: I'm basing my statements on studies, feasible studies that have been done and presented, okay, by the Affordable Housing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 79 Committee here in Naples. Dr. Porto submitted it to the committee. It's in the minutes of the meeting, okay. And I just feel that if we're discussing things, we should discuss the amount of property Habitat owns, in all fairness, letting everybody know what exists out on the corridor, not wanting Habitat Alley as a name for East Naples. I also wanted to point out that District 1, which is the district that we live in, has 30 percent -- 32 percent of -- their properties are appraised at 175,000 and under. I just wanted to throw that out there, because people wanted to know. Now, also, in the reading, I went in and I wanted to see what the assets of Habitat was, and on your Facebook page you have a thing there that your assets are currently, for 2017, were $90,000. You show that you have $10,000 worth of land assets. Could you explain that to me? MR. KOULOHERAS: You're saying -- so I'm sorry. The numbers don't match up, but -- MS. PENTON: I need a clarification. I couldn't understand it. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. So if you're on our 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 80 web page and you're looking at our posted financial reports, our financial audited reports that we have to have done every year -- MS. PENTON: They're (indiscernible). They're colored (indiscernible). I just wanted to touch on that. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. Habitat for Humanity currently has, in the form of assets, roughly $90 million. Now, the majority of that is made up of mortgages. So those are mortgages we currently hold from previous Habitat homes. Our land assets right now are currently valued, I believe, within that same document, of somewhere in the neighborhood of about $18 million, but that is all of our landholdings in all of Collier County. We do own stuff -- we own stuff out in Golden Gate Estates. We own stuff up in Immokalee. We own stuff up in North Naples. We own stuff in Golden Gate City. We are working currently on a home in the City of Naples proper. So that cumulative number is not just an East Naples specific. It is Collier County as a whole organization. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 81 MS. PENTON: Also, from what I understand of what I was reading, that these housing -- affordable housing programs are to make a profit for 15 years. Are you turning a profit out of Regal Acres currently? MR. KOULOHERAS: Turning a profit for 15 years? MS. PENTON: In order to be classified as affordable housing, you have to turn a profit for 15 years. MR. KOULOHERAS: No, no. MS. PENTON: Nothing? MR. KOULOHERAS: So affordable housing that -- well, I think where the 15 years is coming from is that whether it's Habitat for Humanity or any other organization that does housing and deals with housing grants, whether it's through local, state or federal dollars, typically, there is a -- yes, thank you, a deed restriction put on the property for 15 years, which means if it is sold or title transferred within that 15-year time period, and it received one of these grants, that it has to go towards -- the house has to be sold to another qualified affordable housing homeowner. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 82 MS. PENTON: Okay. There was one other thing here I had. You have low income, as you classified. How many are no income? How many turn into becoming no income? MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, I mean, if someone loses a job at some point in time, I'm not going to say that never happens. I think a lot of people lost their jobs during -- from 2008 to 2012. That being said, you have to generate -- you have to pay a mortgage with Habitat. So you have to generate an income. If you were to ask me, what is your standard Habitat family, on average, right, your (indiscernible) average Habitat for Humanity family is mom, dad, two kids, collective gross income, probably in the neighborhood of 34 to $40,000, okay. If those families stop paying their mortgage, Habitat forecloses on that family. MS. PENTON: And what is your percentage of foreclosure? MR. KOULOHERAS: Our foreclosure rate over the history of our organization is less than 1 percent. MS. PENTON: And how much is in Regal Acres? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 83 MR. KOULOHERAS: I don't believe we foreclosed on anyone in Regal Acres. MS. PENTON: Do you know or you don't? MR. KOULOHERAS: No, we haven't. I mean, and our delinquency -- MS. PENTON: You know, I don't want semantics. I want answers. That's why I'm asking the question. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Well, I mean, I'll tell you, I put our statistics up against any bank. And I can tell you right now there is 30 percent -- 30 days or later, you're considered delinquent, whether you're a Habitat family or whether you're a Bank of America customer. Our current delinquency rate, and Lisa, correct me if I'm wrong, the last number I remember looking at was 1.8 percent. So these families, even the highest our delinquency rate got in the height of the recession, 2009 to 2013, the highest our delinquency rate, and once again, please correct me if I'm wrong, Lisa, because you'll know these stats better than I do, was less than 8 percent. MS. PENTON: Okay. Thank you very much. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 84 MS. MONTGOMERY: The young lady in the pink shirt has been waiting longer than anybody (indiscernible) let her go. MR. KOULOHERAS: We've got someone over here, too. Yeah. MS. PAJETTA: Thank you. I'm Kim Pajetta (phonetic). And where -- she left. These letters are for Commissioner Fiala. I have a question for you about -- I know Habitat and affordable housing are -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Get closer to the microphone. MS. PAJETTA: -- two different things at times, but when you all look at where you're going to build, do you look at affordable housing per district? Do you look at how it's distributed, you know, all around Collier County before you pick, this is the place to build? Because we're -- bankers, for instance, work all over Collier. And county employees work all over Collier. So the work is distributed. MR. KOULOHERAS: Uh-huh. MS. PAJETTA: Do you guys look at that? MR. KOULOHERAS: So to answer, probably nobody's going to believe me when I say this, but 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 85 we actually -- we do. So if you ask me my professional opinion, my opinion for Habitat for Humanity, the way I would like to build every Habitat community, a pocket community here, a pocket community here, here, here, here, because it does exactly what you just said. But here is, you know, the reality of the situation as well, though. Remember, it is housing that is affordable and it's at an affordable price point for an income spectrum. So when we have Collier County impact fees, the last one I just signed a check for was $27,000 for a Habitat house. When we have approval cost to get a community through the process of roughly 10 to $15,000 per home, and you take those type of numbers and stack pile them, then you have to sit there and try to be the most strategic and the best negotiator you can be to pick up these parcels of land throughout Collier County. So like I said, I cannot tell you specifically where we're looking, but right now we're looking, actively looking at three parcels north of 75, because that's Lisa and I's direction that we've given our staff and that we've told our board, is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 86 that we're going to do everything we can to try to diversify what Habitat's impact is. So we are actively looking at that, but as kind of the land development numbers guy, if you will, you know, I'm looking at if the numbers work, and I have to consider all those factors. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So a lot of it is land (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: It's a huge value, yeah. Just like any other developer, it is -- a lot of it is land value, yes. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Sometimes I think maybe that's why this certain area is more saturated (indiscernible). I'm not sure of the right words. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Well, and that's where those -- those housing elements that -- those incentives that we talked about, not just for Habitat for Humanity, for any -- I'll pick on D.R. Horton, for example, just a name out of the hat. D.R. Horton has a product they call their express model. They build it in Lehigh Acres for $165,000. They build it in Collier, they're proposing to hopefully build it around $300,000. My last conversations with the folks at D.R. Horton 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 87 is if they could be in that market, they would absolutely be in that market in Collier County, because there's such a use demand for it. The problem is D.R. Horton can't make the numbers work that well because high, high land value, obviously, in land cost, and then those other governmental fees which, on average, nationally, make up about 25 percent of the sales price of a home. So, at the end of the day -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) the end of the day (indiscernible) maybe at higher cost of land but (indiscernible) is equally important. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Maybe they don't -- you know, when somebody is commuting for 45 minutes to get to where they work in North Naples (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: You're 100 percent right. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) it is important. MR. KOULOHERAS: 100 percent right, because there's the value that's that cost associated with commuting. I agree with you 100 percent. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 88 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. MS. ACEVEDO: Hi. My name is Brenda Acevedo (phonetic). I've been here in this room for an hour and I'm a bit confused, and I'm glad I didn't bring my children that would be able to understand all this language, because I thought I was coming to get information about these wonderful houses. I work five days a week, and I -- I mean, I work very hard, and I cannot afford a house that would cost me half a million. So I came here to get information about these wonderful houses. And I feel rejected already just hearing how you don't want these houses built here. It's like what criteria do I have to stand so that I could be, like, wanted in your neighborhood. And overall being here, like I just feel like I'm in the wrong spot. Like am I the only one here that's to get information that's -- I mean, that's for these houses or -- and it's sad, and like I said, I'll repeat myself, I'm glad I didn't bring all my children, because I wouldn't want them to hear everything that -- all this negativity that's been going around this room. I mean, I've been here for an hour and I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 89 haven't heard anything of what I wanted to hear, like do I have to -- what criteria do I have to meet so that I can qualify for your standards? MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. MS. MONTGOMERY: But please, though, let me say this. That's why the state of Florida requires local governments to not discriminate against people. Unfortunately, it happens, but the law doesn't allow it. MR. INCAN: Thank you. Mike Incan (phonetic). I live in Naples Reserve. When I got the letter that there was going to be a development mailed to my house, immediately upset because I was told, like many other folks, that it was going to be a preserve forever back there, but once I calmed down and started looking around, and you need to figure out, what are my options, right, as a homeowner. My house literally looks directly into the preserve that is being proposed for development. So to be 100 percent clear, I'm not for any development in that preserve that's going to ruin the serene preserve view that I look at, whether it's Habitat or $10 million homes. So with that clear and on the record, that I'm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 90 not for any development back there, you know, when I started looking around for, what are my options, I retained an attorney. I reached out to Mark Stein, a long-time commissioner on the Collier County Planning Commission, James Sabo or Sabo, I reached out to him. I did a lot of research into what is the process for rezoning, what are the steps that need to happen. I reached out to Laura, and that's how I found more information about these plans. And so Myra (phonetic) from Habitat reached out and invited me into the office that I met in last week. I went there as an individual, not as a representative of Naples Reserve. And, you know, we were sitting there, you and I, Nick, looking at the plans, potential plans, and figuring out, is there something we can do to maintain as much of a serene view for both our communities, right, for the residents of Habitat or whichever development would be there, and also for the ones at the Naples Reserve, who are going to lose the preserve. And, of course, there was no recording equipment or anything like that. So it's hard to, you know, be -- to prove this, but, you know, you, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 91 if I recall correctly, specifically you said, well, what about a wall. And, you know, we took a paper and you drew the wall and kind of how the area that you wanted, you know, thought it might go. It was like an L shape. You know, then we had some dialogue about, well, the codes only allow six feet, but, you know, we could -- we're already going for eight feet because the folks across the way, they went eight feet. So we could even potentially get an eight-foot wall back here. And, of course, I'm sitting there saying, well, you know, that seems -- if there's going to be a development there, that seems a reasonable place to start. And then we talked about heavy vegetation on both sides of the wall, esthetically pleasing so that, you know, residents of both sides are looking at it and it's just not an ugly concrete wall. You talked specifically about the importance of working with our community throughout the design process so that, at the end of the day, when the wall is built, nobody's upset and saying, you know, wait a second, this isn't what we agreed to, right, so you want kind of our input. So taking all that information, you know, I'm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 92 engaging residents, and I have dozens of signatures, right, basically, what we talked about, about the wall. And, again, I do not want a development, regardless, but if there is going to be one, what are our options. So to listen to you, you know, talk about how you're exploring options, and it costs a lot of money, which I don't -- I don't disagree with, and I'm sure -- it's a little frustrating because I feel like, you know, having you offering that and now I don't feel like you are backing that, it almost feels like you're kind of backing away and leaving yourself an out for in the future being able to come back with a -- you know, and say, well, we tried, but we just need to keep this, you know, community affordable. And so we just can't do it or it's got to be a four foot. So I just wanted to get on the record that's my recollection of how our meeting went. I'm disappointed that you aren't committing to this wall that we discussed right now, because this is how the process works, right? There's a development meeting here. This is on the record. So everything that's said here gets put into a report that Mr. Sabo creates and becomes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 93 part of the plan that's ultimately reviewed. So if you were to commit to a wall today, that is very important and would be much more difficult to back out of in the future. So then it goes to the Collier County Planning Commission, which is a volunteer board that reviews whether the plans meet code and gives a yes-or-no vote based only on whether or not it meets code. And then, ultimately, it goes to the Board of County Commissioners with Donna Fiala and several other members, and they take, obviously, much more into consideration on whether they ultimately approve it, but I would, again, request, you know, us being on the record, that you can commit to this wall that we discussed along the border between Naples Reserve. And, again, I have dozens of folks that support this. And, you know, I don't want any development, but if there is going to be one, who knows what will happen, whether it's Habitat or million-dollar homes, I want to preserve as much as possible that border, for not only myself, but for other folks around. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thanks, Mike. So, you know, (indiscernible) and I truly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 94 appreciated the time that we spent together discussing that. What I really appreciate is your reaching out to say, hey, let's have a dialogue, let's have more conversation about it. So, you know, I don't disagree with any of the points you just made, but there's a few things that were left out. Number one, I said, I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to give you a firm commitment on Monday night because between -- I think our conversation was Wednesday of last week, was it Wednesday or Tuesday or something, and today, I just don't have enough data to be able to sit up here and say, yes, Mike, we can do it, we can do it for this price and this, and so on and so forth. We are going to continue to explore those options. My intention is to, I think, even Myra sent you an e-mail back and saying, hey, once we get some more data, we'd like to sit down again with you or other residents within Naples Reserve and talk those points out. MR. INCAN: Which we still would like to do. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yep. And I truly appreciate that, you know, and I get, you know, the idea of -- the way I understood it, from not just you, but 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 95 from other residents I've talked to at Naples Reserve, was that when it came to the preserve itself, they were sold by whoever that that was going to be a preserve. Now, all I can say for whoever said that was, you know, shame on them for selling you something like that, because that property has been owned by Habitat since -- I believe since 2007. And so for whether -- whoever it was, whether it was a developer or an agent, whoever it might be, to say that that's going to be in perpetuity kept as native lands was just a pointblank lie. And I know personally, if it was myself that just purchased that home and that was there somewhere on record, that that was said to me, I'd have a major issue as well, because -- because that's what I was buying into. And so I agree. Hopefully, we can continue the dialogue, the conversation between us as we sit there and start to develop plans and ideas and cost numbers to see what we could do. I know I believe I did talk to a representative from iStar, that said they're also looking at committing some type of landscaping enhancement down on that southern property line as well. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 96 So I appreciate your comments. I will not deny any of your comments. I think you accurately reflected our conversation with the exception of the fact that I believe I was pretty straightforward, at that point in time, and said by tonight it would probably be too difficult to get you a direct answer, but we're absolutely 100 percent still open for those conversations to see what we can do. Thank you. MS. MONTGOMERY: This young lady is next. MS. RAKESTRAW: I am Vivian Rakestraw and I live in Reflection Lakes. I have a couple of questions. One of them is about the applicants that come to you for housing. Will they have some -- will the main person on the mortgage or somebody always be working? Will there be somebody when they apply for your loans that's working or will you be selling houses to people that don't have an income? MR. KOULOHERAS: I'm, sorry, ma'am. One second. (Multiple simultaneous conversations.) MS. RAKESTRAW: Well, I'm a nurse, too. I guess I better get back there. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes, ma'am. Is she 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 97 okay (indiscernible)? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. I'm sorry. So to answer your question, you said is there someone that will always have a job that is on the primary mortgage or the mortgage. So to answer your question, yes, that has always been the case in all of our applicants. Now, for me to sit there and tell you that someone doesn't lose a job through the course of time -- MS. RAKESTRAW: I understand. MR. KOULOHERAS: -- I could never tell you that, but I will say they have a mortgage with Habitat. Habitat for Humanity has repayment structures in place that are all, you know, recorded documents. And if they do not meet those criteria, whether it's on day one or day 360, then Habitat can take corrective action against that. And I will say this. In my time at Habitat, I am only aware of maybe four instances where we have had some type of extenuating circumstance, and I'll tell you one specifically. We had a family lived right down the street here, actually. Their small child, I believe at the time, he was about six, found out he had 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 98 cancer. They were doing treatments up at the Children's Hospital in Tampa. And they came in, talked to Lisa, talked to myself, and said, listen, it is just very difficult for us right now to be making all these payments work. And, at that point in time, we took the privilege that's awarded -- allowed to us, and we said, you know what, we sympathize with that. We're going to give you a three-month reprieve up front or four month, I forget exactly, I think it was three, and we're just going to tack it onto the back end of your mortgage. That has happened. But as I said, in my 15 years at Habitat, I believe I've seen that happen four times, because we take that very serious. I'm actually -- to be honest, I'm proud that we're able to do that, because -- nothing against Bank of America, that's who my mortgages is with, but I know I couldn't call Bank of America and get that same treatment, so. MS. RAKESTRAW: I know there are some mortgage companies that actually do, you know, take those things into consideration, thank God. And I commend you all for doing that. My second question, just that I'm a registered 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 99 nurse, and I'd like to know what the cost of the houses are going to be. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, sure. So right now, what we're estimating the average sales price of a home within Regal II is going to be in the low 200s, and I mean low, like 200 to 225 is where they're going to come in. Now, I want you to remember what I said about affordability as well. So if there's homeowners that are unable to afford that amount, we are going to try to assist them in some way, shape or form to cover that differential between affordability and then the sales price. But, yeah, right now, I mean, it's hard to kind of put an exact number on something that's potentially three years out, but right now we're looking at the numbers in the low 200s, 200 to 225 range. MS. RAKESTRAW: Okay. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. MS. ARIA: Hi. My name is Constance Aria (phonetic), and I live in Reflection Lakes. I had a question regarding why maybe -- I understand that you have this land since 2010, which I just learned tonight, and I, like many 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 100 people, bought my home with the understanding that we had preserve area around there. And, yes, I understood that there would be, you know, there's a path of progress out the East Trail, but what's being proposed right now isn't in line with the density of the surrounding developments, and it's kind of sandwiched in. So not only is it taking up what I thought was an environmental preserve, which I felt really deeply about, and I really kind of resented when somebody said, you know, the people here are against Habitat or against affordable housing. That's not the case at all. It's about density and balance and win/win within our communities. And it is pretty evident that East Naples -- you know, if there's a pocket of preserve that we thought was preserved, all of a sudden, we have high-density housing going in. So it's a density issue. And, yeah, it does affect everybody's land values because, for one thing, anything that affects the schools, like people pointed out, you know, quality schools. Boy, oh, boy, is that ever going to affect resale for people in surrounding communities. And, you know, it's great to have high 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 101 standards for everyone, win/win for everyone, but there's got to be balance. And I feel like, you know, the way this was approached, all my life -- I grew up poor. I worked hard. I finally got a place that I thought was kind of near preserve area and for retirement. And I feel like this hasn't been so much of a creative brainstorming opportunity as it's been like a dog and pony show, and people who have questions are being told that they're discriminatory. And we have an attorney moderating this meeting? I mean, for heaven sakes, I'm very, very, very disappointed in Habitat, which my whole life I supported, but I'm really disappointed with how this is coming down. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. Yes (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I'll make this pretty quick, okay? I've heard different stories, and I heard you just say something like that we've owned this land since 2007. She said 2010. I've heard all kinds of stuff. Do you own the land you're looking to rezone? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 102 MR. KOULOHERAS: There's 23 acres. Of those 23 acres, we currently own about 12 of those 23 acres. The additional 11 are under contract. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Are under contract? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Are there any situations on that contract that you all have to meet in order for them sell it to you? MR. KOULOHERAS: At this point in time, there are certain restrictions in the contract, but none of them pertain to zoning approvals. So it's all due diligence based on environmental assessments, regulatory assessments, stuff like that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. And I don't think -- one thing I'm going to say here. I really kind of felt the statement that was made earlier that Reflection Lakes and preserve are discriminatory against poor people. Okay. Not a good statement to make. Number two, I used to build Habitat homes in Tennessee. Okay. Beautiful communities and things like that. I mean, really nice. People there were really nice. All I know is in the last two or three weeks, I've been driving through, which I haven't been 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 103 over there since I moved here a year ago, they don't keep the property up. Are they going to have an HOA to mow their lawns on the old section as opposed to the new section? Because -- and it also seems like, over the last two and three weeks, you all went through a massive cleanup campaign over there. So -- because one time you go over there, stuff's all over the place. The other time you go, like this last three or four days ago, everything's kind of cleaned up. Even some of the mowed -- lawns were kind of mowed, okay. But I didn't know what you were going to do. You said the HOA on these things was going to do all the maintenance, things like that. I guess they're going to do house painting? MR. KOULOHERAS: So -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Are they going to take care of everything? I mean, are they going to have something like we have, where we have our HOA and our lawns and everything like that are taken care of? You talked about it on the new section, how about the old section, as people have to go in there? MR. KOULOHERAS: So, first off, to answer your 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 104 question about a cleanup campaign. I can tell you right now, on my life or anyone else, that is not the case. Habitat for Humanity never put together a cleanup campaign to say, oh, well, let's get this all ready because we know we're going to have this meeting. So if it happened, it happened on its own, but it had nothing to do driven by Habitat for Humanity, just to clear that up. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Who are the people that actually own the property? MR. KOULOHERAS: So in Regal Acres, phase 1, it is the existing homeowners. The existing homeowners, obviously, not only own their home and the property that sits underneath their home, but they are also in full control of the HOA itself. So Habitat for Humanity, similar to -- I keep picking on D.R., I don't mean to, but D.R. Horton owns the HOA, if you will, or has managing control of the HOA up until a certain percentage of homes are sold. Habitat for Humanity acts in the very same way. So at whatever that percentage number is, I don't remember off the top of my head, it's between 70 and 90 percent, I believe, that's when it gets turned over to the HOA for their total control and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 105 maintenance. Now, within the new subdivision, we are writing into the documents that the common area maintenance and the maintenance of the property itself at the house is going to be maintained by a company, not by the homeowners themselves. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So you'll kind of have two different HOAs. MR. KOULOHERAS: Currently. Right now, we have two different HOAs. And that being said, Habitat for Humanity is actually going -- Habitat for Humanity -- Lisa and myself are talking to our board about how we can potentially do stuff for our older communities, knowing that we never -- we never get rid of them or we never lose contact with them. And seeing some of those mistakes and how can we go back and take some corrective actions to get in there. Now, you've got to remember, it's not the easiest thing to do, because it would be like -- you said you lived in Reflection Lakes, sir? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Uh-huh. MR. KOULOHERAS: It would be like D.R. Horton or Neal Communities coming in ten years later and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 106 say, hey, HOA, we don't like the way you're doing it, we want to do it this way. So there's hurdles to overcome, but we have been trying to work on that for about 18 months now. It hasn't been hugely successful, but we're still diligently trying to work at that issue. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So I'm just getting back to the property ownership. So the new acreage you're actually asking for rezoning, you don't actually own that? It's under contract, but you don't actually own that. MR. KOULOHERAS: We own about -- we own about 12 acres of the 23. We do currently own that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, you already have approval of the 12 acres, correct? MR. KOULOHERAS: The approval of the 12 acres is a -- I'm sorry -- I misunderstood your question. The 12 acres that are currently sitting there are zoned agricultural as well. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. MR. KOULOHERAS: So the 12 acres that -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So you're actually trying to zone stuff you do own and stuff you don't own? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, that is correct. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 107 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. Thank you. MS. MURPHY: Liz Murphy (phonetic), Reflection Lakes. Actually, the gentleman asked a few of the questions that I was going to ask, so you answered most of them, but I'm just curious. So you own 12 out of 23. So there's 11 acres that you don't currently own, but you're under agreement to purchase? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. MS. MURPHY: With contingencies. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. MS. MURPHY: So once those contingencies are met, regardless of the change in zoning, you're going to purchase those acres? MR. KOULOHERAS: As it stands today, it is Habitat's intention to purchase that acreage, yes. MS. MURPHY: Okay. You're under contract. Like I say, so even if the zoning doesn't go through, you're going to purchase those 11 acres? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. MS. MURPHY: Okay. And does the other owner have to go in with you if the zoning is going to be before you purchase the land, the other owner has to go in with you to apply for the change? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 108 MR. KOULOHERAS: So, yes. Yeah, the other -- MS. MURPHY: Well, I don't know about authorization, but where I come from, and I'm from Massachusetts, not far from where you came from, to be quite honest with you, where I come from, the owner who has the interest in the land, who's the fee owner of the land has to be on the application and apply because, basically, it's for them. It's not for a third party. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, so I -- Laura, probably, correct me if I'm wrong, but there has to be authorization, just as you said, and please correct me if I'm wrong, that the owner is under the -- is willing and in the understanding that whoever is buying the property, Habitat, whatever, what they're doing and where they're going with it. So they are kind of a part of the process. It doesn't mean they're involved in the process, per se, as far as, you know, day-to-day activity, conversation, stuff like that. But, yes, when we submit our paperwork to the county, the Collier County legal team is going to say, wait a minute, you don't own these 11 acres. Who's giving you permission to try to encumber these 11 acres. And you have to fill out an authorization form. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 109 MS. MURPHY: So Collier County will -- that's what their policy is, they'll authorize somebody -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Correct. And they've already -- MS. MURPHY: -- who can actually go in and do that on behalf of somebody, like a proposed buyer? MR. KOULOHERAS: Uh-huh. Yeah. Here. I'm sorry. This should give you a much better -- MS. DeJOHN: Excuse me. Laura DeJohn, a planner with Johnson Engineering. It is actually a standard part of the Collier County application form. It has a blank to fill in who is the applicant, who is the owner, is there a contract for purchase, what is the date of the contract for purchase. So it's -- it's normal in Florida, in southwest Florida for transactions to be happening -- MS. MURPHY: So as long as there's a contract for sale -- MS. DeJOHN: Yes. MS. MURPHY: -- that's considered the vested interest? MS. DeJOHN: Yes. MS. MURPHY: -- in the property that you're -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 110 MS. DeJOHN: And then the signatures, as Nick described. They're to be notarized affidavits identifying the owner, their name, you know, their corporate background, if there's a corporate entity, signing the authorization for this application to be submitted, yes. MS. MURPHY: Thank you. And I'll just make one final comment as well, and I'm just going to expound on what the previous speaker, you know, was saying, is, you know, when we purchased the land in Reflection Lakes, I did my due diligence. I looked at the land. Okay. It was zoned agricultural. So, you know, it's almost like they're trying to shame us into saying we don't want Habitat in our backyard. That wasn't the case at all. The case was to sit out there with a cup of coffee in the morning, you know what I'm saying? Looking out. We've got the wildlife out there. It's beautiful out there. Everybody's looking at nice scenery. And now, all of a sudden, I'm just saying, whether it's, like I say, million-dollar homes or whether it's Habitat for Humanity or whatever, it's not just the traffic. It's not just, you know, the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 111 view or whatever. It's the noise, okay. It's the garbage. And I'm not saying they're going to create any more garbage than I would create, but you know what? It gets windy. Okay. How many times you go out in your yard and you've got a piece of paper blowing around, or you got something else. It's just because there's a lot -- you know, there's more houses. It just creates a lot more nuisance, okay. So that's all I have to say. It's not that we're against anything. It's just that when I bought, that's what I was told, and then all of a sudden -- and I did my due diligence. And now, all of a sudden, everything has changed. And it just doesn't seem fair to the people who went in under that -- you know, that's just the way it was. That's all I have to say. MR. KOULOHERAS: No. And I'll tell you -- like I said before, I appreciate those comments, because I don't like knowing that someone, or whoever that person was, misled you down the road that -- MS. MURPHY: They led a lot of people down the road. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 112 MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Yeah. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That's why we're here. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yep. Sorry. MS. DeJOHN: Just a quick geography issue I want to clarify. Reflection Lakes does have a preserve that -- so, again, Neale described how the code defines preserve. Preserves have conservation easements over them. They cannot be touched. That's a Collier County Land Development Code defined preserved. And when we use the word "preserve," we're accustomed to that definition. There is a conservation easement over a preserve along the eastern edge of Reflection Lakes. I don't know the name of your street that runs east -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Manchester Driver. MS. DeJOHN: Manchester. So the houses off of Manchester have woods in their backyard. That's 150 feet of preserve that has an easement over it that's part of Reflection Lakes. Does that clarify? Because the proposed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 113 development of the Habitat site includes -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Just one question. (Indiscernible) 300 feet (indiscernible) 150 plus 150. MS. DeJOHN: It includes -- plus 150. Includes the -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Or is that 150 plus 300? MS. DeJOHN: No, 150 -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: What we were told is no one will ever build behind us. That's what we were told. MS. DeJOHN: But okay -- I think once you get acclimated to Florida. You get to hear that statement when you first come to Florida, and then you get to experience it, because just like was stated by someone at West Winds, who is the longest standing community in this area, West Winds probably thought Reflection Lakes would be a preserve forever. So we -- it's a matter of fact that you can't guarantee someone is not going to use their land that they own. If it's someone else's land, it's improper to assume that there's some type of control over someone not using their land. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 114 MR. KRASKA: Hi. My name is Paul Kraska and I live also in Reflection Lakes. I had a plethora of information I wanted to ask. It was covered. I'm not going to go over it in the interest of time. But I do think that we are either evading or not bringing up the fact, what are the young adults and children going to do in this community? You have no pools. You have no tennis courts. You have no basketball, pickleball, no administrative building, nothing. So where do these kids go? Are they going to be now infiltrating into Naples Reserve? We've had issues with people infiltrating into Reflection Lakes recently as this past Saturday. So where -- how do you calm our fears down on that? MR. KOULOHERAS: Sure. To answer your question -- so once again we're going to kind of compare Habitat of old to habitat of new. Habitat for Humanity of old would sit there and look at a piece of property, and we'd look at that property and say, okay, we think we can get 200 homes in it or we could get 190 homes and have a nice play area. And the mentality would be, get 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 115 200 homes in it, because that's what we're in the business of doing. The Habitat of new looks at a place like the proposed Regal II here. We say, okay, well, with -- long-term maintenance has an affordable factor as well. And we say, you know, we know our families, from an HOA fee, cannot afford long-term maintenance of multi-million dollar clubhouse facilities that have a pool or an administrative building or the upkeep of, you know, Har-Tru tennis courts and all that stuff. But we do realize that there needs to be an outlet for children and families. And so what we've tried to do with this community is look at outlets that are low, long-term maintenance cost. So in the recreational area that we are proposing, is not only now -- it's roughly the size of a football field, whereas, before, if you drive through any other old Habitat community, it's a postage stamp. It's, you know, 40 by 40 at best. And within that football field size, roughly, we plan on having a playground for younger kids, let's call it the two to ten bracket. We plan on having a little gazebo area, is what we're proposing right now, so families can go 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 116 out there and have a place to socialize or have a little birthday party. We're also proposing to build a half-court basketball court on-site, as well as a smaller, it may not be Astro Turf, but that would be my preference, just because of the maintenance cost long-term on it, even though it costs a lot more money up front, some type of utility field, if you will, that you could go out there and you could play soccer, you could throw a football, you could do that type of stuff. And then, within the community as well, we're trying to implement more, not only the sidewalk system, but we're trying to implement walking trails. So, for example, we're talking about maybe putting a walking trail that goes around the lake, a walking trail that comes around some part of the homes, the backyard, if you will, of the homes, to give someone, if they wanted to go out and jog laps, for example, it would give someone just to go out there and walk their child or to go jog laps. So we're trying to do things a lot better than we were as far as accommodating exactly what you said, but with those other facilities, you know, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 117 like the ones that are in Reflection Lakes, the ones that are in Naples Reserve, I'm not going to say I know exactly what your HOA fee is, but my thinking is it's probably in the neighborhood of $300 a month or more, and $300 a month in an HOA fee just doesn't work for affordability for, really, anyone that Habitat tailors to or even that income bracket right above it. So I hope I helped answer your question. MR. KRASKA: Yeah. It's just the fact that you didn't speak about that. This is the first (indiscernible) you brought up, finally. And I'm concerned because I'm a family-orientated person, and I said, we can't forget that. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. No, and you're absolutely right. MR. KRASKA: (Indiscernible) Habitat (indiscernible) this non-55-year-old age limit community. (Indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yep. Yeah. Absolutely. In one of our renderings back there, you can kind of see it. It's on the southern side, if you will, but it's not fully -- it's not the greatest aerial of that rendering. Yes, sir. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 118 MR. DOMINICS: How you doing? My name is Rick Dominics (phonetic). I live on Greenway Road. Does anybody else here live on Greenway Road? I didn't think so. I live directly across the street from the first entrance of Regal Acres. And since they've built that, you guys can't control the traffic now, how are you going to control more traffic than what we already have? I mean, they've got them running up and down the road 50, 60 miles an hour. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: They have drag races on that road. MR. DOMINICS: Oh, yeah, you hear them. They're drag racing. You call the Sheriff's Department. They come out. They're gone. Every week, I pick up -- I got a UTV (phonetic) with a dump bed in it. I pick up -- I fill that dump bed with trash out of my ditch. I've picked up dirty diapers out of my ditch. And you're going to sit there and say, well, how do you know it was us? Well, the trash dump stops at the second entrance to Regal Acres. Past that, all the way to Naples Reserve, there's no trash in the ditch. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 119 So I don't know how -- you know, when you first started this deal, it was supposed to be 75 houses. They pulled a permit. The permit said 75 houses. I go to Tennessee. I come back. All of a sudden, there's 100 and some houses, but the permit was only 75 when you first started, before you cleared the land. So, you know, I don't know how you're going to control 116 more people, how you're going to control another 300 cars coming up and down Greenway Road. You can't control what you got. MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, so, for the clarity of the 75 homes, Rick, I mean, you and I have known each other for years. MR. DOMINICS: Yeah. MR. KOULOHERAS: The ordinance that was passed in 2007 or so, listed out the 184 units then. So I'm not quite sure where that number 75 is coming from, but I'm certainly not going to argue with it. As far as maintaining the trash and the control. So from Habitat's standpoint, I can tell you that our efforts have stepped up. Our HOA rules and regulations are stepping up. And we're going to try to do some things to improve that. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 120 Am I going to be able to sit here and guarantee you, Rick, you're never going to have to pick up another piece of trash in that ditch? You know, I couldn't do it. As far as the drag racing and that type of stuff goes, I can't tell you how many times I've almost been run off that road by dump trucks coming out of Naples Reserve. And I have personally called the police no less than a dozen times myself to say, can you please set up speed traps out here. We've talked to the HOA. We've talked to -- so we're going to continue doing that, but I don't disagree with you, Rick, and I think that, you know, collectively, if you call me, I mean, I think you've known me long enough, every time you've called me to say, hey, Nick, I've got something out here, I've pretty much jumped on it. And, you know, we'll continue to try to work on it, but I can't sit there and guarantee you that, yeah, I'll have a specific cleanup crew that goes out there every Friday. MR. DOMINICS: Well, you know, you bring up the dump trucks. The neighborhood got together and everybody called so many times, they set up speed traps for the dump trucks. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 121 I talked to the Sheriff's Department. He pulled over more people from Regal Acres than he pulled over dump trucks. MR. KOULOHERAS: Did he? MR. DOMINICS: So, you know. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. Well, that's good information to know. We'll have -- MR. DOMINICS: I mean, you know, I come home from work, and I'm coming down Greenway Road, and I've got people stuck up my bumper and passing me, and I'm doing 30, 35 miles an hour, which is the speed limit so they've got to be doing at least 40, 50 miles an hour. Everybody's worrying about where the kids are going to go to school. I don't see having any kids left if you let them walk down the road. MR. KOULOHERAS: No. You make a valid point. MR. DOMINICS: And they do walk down the road. MR. KOULOHERAS: They absolutely do. MR. DOMINICS: They talk about building walls. You know, I'm 400 feet off the road. You know how far my house sits off the road. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, sir. MR. DOMINICS: Okay. You guys built the wall. I sit down and eat dinner, and I'm listening to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 122 kids yelling and screaming like they were in my front yard. So your walls, you know, you can plant all the walls and trees and shrubs and all the other crap, it doesn't do any good. You know, they need a place to play instead of out and about in the street. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. MR. DOMINICS: You know, and they're going to get hit. Somebody's going to get hit. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. No, I tell you, I hope that day never comes, but I don't disagree with you. We've got to do something to address that. MR. DOMINICS: How are we going to control -- how are we going to control more traffic and more trash? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Well, the only thing I can tell you right now is that the Habitat for Humanity -- you know me. I encourage this type of communication. And I know that I've gone out there. I know I've personally -- well, I'm not going to talk about me. I know Lisa herself has personally gone and went down after a car going down Greenway Road and stopped them at 41 and got out and yelled at them. What we can do is we can sit there and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 123 continue. If this information comes in, I'll talk to the Sheriff's Department as well, we can sit there and continue to talk to these folks and try and educate them and tell them how stupid it is to be going like a, you know, and Knight Rider down Greenway Road, which is, if I'm not mistaken, it's a 30. MR. DOMINICS: 30, yeah, it's 30 miles an hour. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, it's a 30, if I'm not mistaken. MR. DOMINICS: Yeah. MR. KOULOHERAS: So I don't agree -- can't -- MR. DOMINICS: At 30, you're going to get run over. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Yeah. MR. DOMINICS: That's the way it is. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. So one of the concerns our homeowners in Regal, the existing phase of Regal Acres brought up was cars traveling through Regal Acres I to get to the proposed new site, and we're talking about speeding and stuff like that, and we're talking about those speed bumps and stuff like that, not that that cures the problem, but it 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 124 helps settle the problem a little bit. The other thing that we've been trying to work on for years is getting some type of lights down Greenway Road. I know it's a county road. So we can't do it ourselves, but I don't have a great answer to say, yeah, Mike, you know, we're going to sit out -- I'm sorry, Rick, we are going to sit out there with the Sheriff's Department for a month and nip it in the bud. I hope we can do that. And if we can, we will, because I don't disagree with you. MR. DOMINICS: Well, you know, I had another situation about four weeks ago. I woke up about 2:00 in the morning, and I got lights shining in the front of my house. I get up, and I go, where are these lights coming from. And, you know, across the street, they got that little place you can like park one car? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Yes. MR. DOMINICS: It's directly across from my driveway. There's a pickup truck or SUV sitting there with its lights off. So I'm sitting there, sitting there. And he turns his lights off. A car comes by, he flashes his lights on and off. So I called the Sheriff's Department. And 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 125 she says, we're going to send somebody out. If he moves, give me a call back. A minute later, he moves. He goes into Regal Acres. Right behind him is two sheriff's cars. Well, I already had her on the phone. I said, your guys are right behind him. He just pulled into Regal Acres. So they pull in one entrance, come out the other entrance. When they got right in front of my house, the Sheriff's Department pulls him over. So I'm standing there in the dark. They can't see me. He's sitting there talking to this guy. He doesn't have his hand on the gun. He did not check the guy's driver's license. And I go, what's up with this. So he takes off. I called the deputy over. And I said, what's going on. He said, oh, it was some kid sleeping. I said, it was some kid sleeping, flashing his lights on and off? Well, he was scared. Well, what I did was screw up an undercover operation. He was a cop. He didn't check his driver's license. You're going to let some kid drive away that's sleeping on the street? Uh-uh. No way. So I don't know what was going on with that 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 126 deal. It's an assumption of mine. It might not be true, but it just makes sense. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. No, it's -- MR. DOMINICS: That's all -- you know, that's all I got to say, Nick. Same stuff that I always (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. I understand that. MR. DOMINICS: Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: I agree. No. Thank you, Rick. Yes, sir. You got -- oh, I'm sorry. Sorry about that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So we also have panthers running around in this area, so -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: We also have panthers running around this area, so losing any of the green space or the preserve area is detrimental. Is there any flexibility on the design of this to where we can have 300 feet of green space between all of the developments? In particular, where you're proposing the retention pond, can that be moved and a 300-foot buffer of green space be placed there? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 127 MR. KOULOHERAS: So to answer -- I mean, Laura might want to better answer -- well, Laura's not here. She's -- but to answer your question specifically about the Florida panther, the Florida panther, there's primary and secondary consultation areas with U.S. Fish & Wildlife, because the panther is obviously still a listed species, and they will -- we will perform and they will require us to perform any type of studies where we could negatively affect the Florida panther. That doesn't necessarily prohibit you from building there. Obviously, all the surrounding communities around us have to go through the same process. And, typically, what U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service would rather see you do is purchase mitigation credits to keep preserve in perpetuity in an area that the Florida panther, it's more conducive to their habitat. So instead of creating a little pocket node, if you will, within this community, they would rather you go and give them money. Then they purchase 100 acres of land, let's say, in, you know, Lee, Hendry or Collier County somewhere where there's more panther habitat. To answer your question specifically about 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 128 flexibility within the site plan. So there are some -- there is some ability to work with the site plan. The reason we have designed the site plan kind of the way it is right now and not create that preserve up around the north side is because the north side of the property doesn't really have the best vegetation for a preserve as far as the native stuff that's in there. The second part of it, from a utility standpoint, the lake is there for -- as a buffer, but it's also there because if we use a gravity sewer system to feed down to the existing Regal I sewer line, that house that's to the furthest point north, if you will, in our community, that is the furthest away that house can get in order for that gravity system to work unless we wanted to go and build that house an additional, you know, foot, two foot, three foot, four foot higher. But we didn't want to do that because every bit that we propose to go higher is more of a chance that someone could see the top of that house from a surrounding neighborhood. So we're -- that question about moving stuff has been brought up before. We're working with 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 129 Johnson Engineering to see if there's any type of shifts that we can do, but that's where we currently stand. Okay. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) water retention pond for (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: No. You need a water retention pond no matter what. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Does that water retention pond count as wetland acres? MR. KOULOHERAS: No, it does not. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Does not. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Correct. Hi. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). Just in reference to the traffic or the impact study. How long does that take? MR. BROWN: The actual study? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Why don't (indiscernible) folks can hear you. MR. BROWN: Depending on the complexity, the traffic impact study can take six weeks -- six months to perform, depending on how many intersections need to be analyzed. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So just say six to eight. No? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 130 MR. BROWN: Sure. Six to eight months. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And when did it start? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And when is that done? Is that done during snowbird season or is that done when (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, that was going to be my question. What time of the year was it done? MR. BROWN: I don't know off the top of my head when the traffic counts were done. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I'm sorry. I cut you off. Right? MR. BROWN: I'm not sure exactly when the traffic counts were done. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Because you stated it ain't done yet. MR. BROWN: It's a long-term process. There's data collection. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. MR. BROWN: There's data analysis. And you look at multiple intersections. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. MR. BROWN: And it's covered multiple times during the year. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 131 MS. MONTGOMERY: I think they're wondering about when you did the count, but regardless of when you do the counts, the traffic counts, you have to adjust them to peak season; is that correct? MR. BROWN: Right. They're adjusted for peak season, for peak hour, and there's also growth rates that are attached to those. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Another quick questions. In reference to wetlands, now, I'm originally from up north, and if there's wetlands, there's no building allowed at all. So is there wetlands on this property that you're looking at? MR. BROWN: There are wetlands on the property, yes. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And you're able to build on the wetlands? MR. BROWN: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: On the wetland itself, or do you have to shift it over, like fill it in or something? MR. BROWN: Yeah. You wouldn't put the building on the wetlands. So you would bring in -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 132 import fill and impact the wetland, and you mitigate for that off-site. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. Thank you. MS. MONTGOMERY: And just for the record, in all of southwest Florida, don't you generally have to fill for the house pads? MR. BROWN: Absolutely. MS. MONTGOMERY: So everybody that's here probably lives on a piece of property that's been filled? MR. BROWN: They've probably had several feet of fill. That's why you have all those lakes. MS. MONTGOMERY: Right. Thank you. MR. CILIA: Hello. My name is Richard Cilia. I live over in Naples Reserve, and I'm originally from New York City, 34 years with the New York City Fire Department. And I've seen ghettos turned into beautiful million-dollar neighborhoods also. As a matter fact, we were just talking about the Bronx, the way it was done through politics, okay, and that's what scares me, is politics. You talk about these homes could -- being put in. You're talking about two-story homes. People talking about walls. Walls are not going to do it. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 133 If you put up an eight-foot wall and you got a 16-foot -- story house, people can still look over the fence and look at their neighbors. The other thing is the effect, what you're going to have on the animals. We just had a smoky season, and the amount of animals that came onto Naples Reserve and onto Reflection Lake were outstanding. I mean, I've never seen a bear up until that time when we had the heavy smoke. I had my wife was driving, and a cougar ran out in front. Every day, we see deer. Again, what you're doing is like taking everything and just pushing them out of the way. So, eventually, where do they go? The other thing was -- that was brought to my attention is when we looked at the map, okay, of this street, Evergreen, there is a truck route that goes through there and that was built so the trucks could come in. They don't have to use the main gate, okay, to -- MR. KOULOHERAS: You're talking at Reflection Lakes? MR. CILIA: Reflection Lakes, exactly. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. MR. CILIA: And that gate was put in. All 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 134 right. Now, say, for argument's sake, now you're going to build your homes there, okay. Eventually, you're going to close that gate so that those people cannot come into Reflections Lake or into Naples Reserve and use their facilities since these people at Naples Reserve or at Reflection Lake are paying a high HOA fee and a CDD fee to have this stuff, and these people are not. So to stop them, you're going to close the gate. Now, did anybody respond to the fire department and say, well, you know, if you close that gate, you have no egress. If the front of -- if the front of Naples Reserve or Reflection Lake is the only way out, and it's on fire, people are trapped inside. There is no second exit. It's closed, unless you got a truck that will go through it. MR. KOULOHERAS: Go through it, yeah. MR. CILIA: And that's just -- you know, I'm talking -- I'm not talking about -- Habitat for Humanity is a great thing, okay. I'm just saying that I think it's a tight spot. You -- we had -- last year, you had hurricanes and the place got flooded. And when you start building houses, you're taking away land. You take 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 135 away trees, there's nothing to absorb that water, okay. You go creating another problem. And that's all I have to say. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: No. Thank you. MR. CILIA: Thank you for your attention. MR. KOULOHERAS: No, I appreciate your comments. Yeah. I'm sorry. Go ahead. MS. MONTGOMERY: I just wanted to respond. I know he's concerned about flooding, and under the applicant's handbook, which is the rules that the South Florida Water Management District requires you to comply with, does it allow you to cause flooding on off-site properties? MR. KOULOHERAS: No. By rules and regulations, we are required to retain all of our water on site, and let it discharge slow at a metered rate, so -- MR. CILIA: I understand, but that still causes, not a problem only for us, but for the people that you're building homes for. It's going to create a problem. They're going to get flooded also. MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, the finished floors are 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 136 set at an elevation that's high enough that it won't be a problem. MS. MONTGOMERY: And, in fact, in January, the Standard Building Code was changed, wasn't it, to require another foot of (indiscernible)? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. The new finished floors are FEMA flood elevation plus one foot. MR. BROWN: Yeah, to answer your question. You know, all it's going to take is a big wave for most of Florida to be underwater. But in our Regal Acres community, the existing one, post hurricane, and I mean post, like next day, there was no flooding of the community itself. There was no water over roadways. The ground was certainly saturated. I will tell you that much, but the system, the way they design these systems, not that I'm an engineer, it's designed to accommodate a 100-year flood. Now, what you've got to remember about this past hurricane season was interesting is two weeks before the hurricane, we had a 100-year flood event. And so you had a 100-year flood event, because we had those, like those six days of rain straight, and then you had the hurricane two weeks later. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 137 But the design with the new communities is usually the restriction is so tight that all that water that falls within the property line has to be retained on-site, and then only goes out, off-site in the case of, you know -- well, let's put it this way. If it goes off-site like that, I'll probably be on the ark, because -- but to answer -- you have a valid point, but these communities are designed to -- MR. CILIA: The other thing that I would like to bring a point to is I understand you have an attorney here and everything else like that. We don't. We weren't told anything until the last second about this project going on, and it's been going on for how long? Five years, that you've been planning this? MR. KOULOHERAS: The actual design process of this community started roughly 12 months ago, eight months ago. MR. CILIA: Eight months? Okay. MR. KOULOHERAS: About eight months ago. And so a number of weeks ago, I forget exactly when, to be totally honest with you, I did speak at a Reflection Lakes HOA board meeting. We went and met with the folks at West Winds. We did not have 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 138 a community meeting with the folks at the Naples Preserve (sic). We did meet a couple of those folks who you heard talk tonight, but they were not in an official capacity for the community. MR. CILIA: Well, that was the personal problem between the people of Naples Reserve and the HOA of Naples Reserve, because for some reason they feel that they run the place, okay. They have to understand that the people of Naples Reserve are the HOA. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. MR. CILIA: We pay their salaries. Even though they're trying to tell us what to do, we still have the last say-so. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, so you're talking about the developer, yep. MR. CILIA: We should be in these meetings, not left aside and say, well, we have a board of directors. Well, we're paying for those board of directors. They should listen to us, okay. They shouldn't just go ahead and sign papers and give away this land with -- I don't say give it away, but what I'm trying to get at is we should be involved as owners of the HOA. These people are only workers. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 139 Don't get me wrong, okay? They try to do a decent job. I don't feel that they're looking out for our best benefit, and that's going against my own HOA. Because, I mean, there's a game going on here, and nobody's informing us. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Oh, yeah, yeah. No, and I can understand -- MR. CILIA: And you like start to feel like, you know, hey, somebody's trying to get over on me. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Well, and I can understand your point completely, and of reaching out to Naples Preserve, I'll blame one person. I'll blame myself and myself only, because that's my job to do that, and I didn't go out there and meet with your HOA, the residents of your HOA. MR. CILIA: Well, tomorrow would be a great time to come because the owners of -- what is it, IA or -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. MR. CILIA: The people that own the land. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, iStar. MR. CILIA: iStar. They're all coming tomorrow. They're going to be running through the neighborhoods, seeing how everything is working 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 140 out. For some reason, I just got this information a little while ago. That's why I got here late. I was talking to somebody who says, oh, the owner of iStar is going to be here tomorrow. They're trying to clean the place up, and all the workers were working till like 8:00 at night, you know, trying to straighten this place, you know. Half the palm trees are laying down on the ground. MR. KOULOHERAS: A publicly-traded company (indiscernible) yeah, that happened. MR. CILIA: But I think that would be a great time for you to come over. MR. KOULOHERAS: So I -- Don Meyer (phonetic) or Mayor (phonetic), him and I have talked from iStar, but to be honest, like I told Mike, who was sitting over here, I (indiscernible) certainly talk with Don, but, you know, as we continue these conversations, as you just pointed out, I'd much rather talk to the residents, because let's say this community gets approved and we move forward. The last thing that I certainly want to do, and we've been talking about walls and we've been talking about hedges and landscape and all that stuff, but the last thing I certainly want to do is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 141 to go and spend tens, thousands, hundreds of thousands of dollars to develop something that I think is going to be good for you guys, for you guys to be just like, well, that doesn't work for us. MR. CILIA: Right. MR. KOULOHERAS: It's a waste of, you know, resources from Habitat's standpoint. It's a waste of time for you guys, so -- MR. CILIA: But if you look at the issue and everything else that's around you, okay, that's in the past, okay, you look at Bonita Springs, you look at Immokalee, the crime, you look at people on the news today, tonight, okay, somebody moved the guy's furniture. Found out it was an alligator in his backyard pushing his furniture up against the door and the guy couldn't get out of his own house. This is what your future is going to look like if you try to take all of these animals and put them into one space. You're forcing them to come live with us. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, and -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: You still have another -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Oh, I'm sorry. Okay. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 142 MR. CILIA: Go ahead. I'm sorry. MR. KOULOHERAS: We can certainly talk to you later, maybe. MR. CILIA: Okay. MR. SUSSMAN: Okay. My name is Bill Sussman (phonetic). I'm new to the area. I'm in Naples Reserve. I'm trying to get a handle on all this. I have a feeling that it's already a fait accompli and this is a dog and pony show. But fundamental question, why are we not building on land that's already been zoned residential? Why are we taking away what had been zoned as preserve, number one? Number two, what's the impact on our taxes? People have to be accommodated with services, with education. The school has to be expanded. I'm going to stop. Just one observation. I drove down Greenway because I don't know my way around here. I took a look at the existing community. What I observed was that about half of these homes have four or five cars in their driveway. Four or five cars in a driveway? Some of the homes were well-maintained and some were not at all 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 143 maintained. That's it. MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, thank you. And I hope to answer some of your questions. As far as the property's concerned, the property is currently zoned agricultural. Most of Collier County, over the history of time, was zoned agriculture. Why do we not build on already zoned property? I will tell you right now, if I had an option to build on zoned property that had entitlements on it, I would take that option every single day of the week. Unfortunately, those options, in Collier County, as they currently sit, are few and far between -- there aren't many of them. And the ones that do exist, the prices are so expensive. There's one that just sold in north Vanderbilt and 951. I believe the number was somewhere around 6 or $7 million. It was listed for 10, for 116 homes. That's what they were zoned for. So in order for that developer to make a profit, they might have to turn out homes inside that community for somewhere north of $600,000. So that obviously does not work for Habitat. So I would agree, if there was land out there 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 144 that was zoned, that's the first stuff that we try to go after if we can afford it, but most property in Collier County is zoned ag. All the surrounding communities around this Regal Acres, Naples Reserve, Reflection Lakes, those were all zoned agricultural lands before those developers came in and rezoned them to RPUDs. So don't disagree as far as where to build the property identified, but that's just kind of, as someone that's personally been in Collier County now for about 17 years, it's just the MO. I know it's not a great answer, but -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What's the impact on the taxes? (Indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: So the impact on taxes. Thank you. So, if you're -- first of all, if you're -- there's the homestead laws and all those other things if you're a full-time -- if your domicile is here in Collier County. But the mantra in Collier County has typically been growth pays for growth. So we talked about impact fees. That $27,000 impact fee that I told you I just wrote a check for, $8,000 or so of that was for schools. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 145 An additional $6,000 of it was for sewer and water, and another 6,000 was roughly for the roadway network. So when you folks bought your home, you paid an impact fee. Whether you knew it or not, that was part of your sales price. And so as far as the tax burden of future communities, the design of Collier County, the way it governs itself, is really that there's no additional tax burden to the existing taxpayer. Will taxes go up over time? I know they're proposing a one cent sales tax that's going on the docket, I believe, this fall, but that is primarily, if you looked at that legislation locally, that is primarily to fund roadway projects out in the eastern lands of Collier County where they're expecting growth, but they don't have the revenue from the impact fees to pay for it yet. So the tax implication for this community of 116 homes having -- on Collier County is -- is it zero? Yeah, I'd say it's zero. I will tell you this. Every one of the residents inside this community is going to be paying taxes. So if there's an issue where that becomes where you have to pay for it, they're going 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 146 to be footing the bill with you, but like I said, that's typically -- I wish Commissioner Fiala was still here, because she'd probably tell you, typically, growth pays for growth. That's the way they have set it up in Collier County. Did I answer your question the best I could? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: As a politician, could things change? MR. KOULOHERAS: Are you calling me a politician? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: You seem to have (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: I think that's an insult, but -- (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: What I'm trying to get at is the Habitat for Humanity, okay, are homes for people who have children, and really can't afford a nice place, you know, to raise their children. Now, in New York, if you own a home, and I don't have any children living with me, they have what they call a star program, where you pay less 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 147 tax on your property than the person who does have children, because that -- 95 percent of the taxes in New York go to schools. MR. KOULOHERAS: And I don't -- to answer your question, I mean, so I'm not a politician -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That's why you're not answering it. MR. KOULOHERAS: (Indiscernible) Usually, I defer to staff on those types of questions, but, you know, could something change? Absolutely. But I don't believe anything like that exists in Collier County. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I know it never will either, probably. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) education in Florida. MS. MONTGOMERY: Do we have any other questions? MR. KOULOHERAS: I will say this, if I could just close, if we don't have any questions. I do appreciate the folks that stayed around as long as you have to hear the whole story. I know some folks probably had other commitments and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 148 that's fine. But I do appreciate the folks that sat here in those, I'm sure, very comfortable pews for the past couple hours, however long we've been here. Are there any other questions? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: No. We thank you. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: We thank you for showing. MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, in that case, thank you very much for your time. I truly appreciate it. (Recording concluded.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 149 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I, Joyce B. Howell, do hereby certify that: 1. The foregoing pages numbered 1 through 148 contain a full, true and correct transcript of proceedings in the above-entitled matter, transcribed by me to the best of my knowledge and ability from the digital recording provided by the court. 2. I am not counsel for, related to, or employed by any of the parties in the above-entitled cause. 3. I am not financially or otherwise interested in the outcome of this case. 4. I am an approved transcriber for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court. SIGNED AND CERTIFIED: ________________________ Date: June 12, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 From:LynnLivingston[mailto:redwingnut1@gmail.com] Sent:Sunday,June03,20188:12PM To:NickKouloheras<nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org> Subject:RegalAcresII DearMr.Kouloheras, ThankyouforrecentlyspeakingatourReflectionLakesMeeting. MyfamilyisstronglyopposedtoanyexpansionoftheHabitatforHumanitydevelopmentcalledRegalAcres,whichwe understandwillbecalledRegalAcresII.ThecurrentcommunitycalledRegalAcresisaneyesore.80%ofthecommunity hashomesthatarenotwellͲmaintainedandyardsthatareworse.Someofthehomeshave3Ͳ4carsinthedriveway, evenduringworkinghours.Thesearesupposedtobesinglefamilyhomesbutobviouslyhaveextendedfamiliesthat havemovedin. Evennow,wecanhearthenoiseandloudpartyingatnightfromexistingHabitathomes.TeenagersfromRegalAcres havebeencomingalongthecanalandtrespassingonReflectionLakesprivatepropertyonseveraldifferentoccasions. Wehaveseengroupsof3Ͳ8teenagersrunthroughourandourneighbors’yards.ThentheyusuallyheaddownSonoma BlvdtoUS41.HavingmoreHabitathomesonly150feetfromtheeastsideofReflectionLakeswillbeahorribleeyesore, morenoiseandpossibleincreaseintrespassing. ThankyouforbringingthistotheneighborhoodinformationmeetingonJune4th. Aubrey&JudyLivingston 14587ManchesterDr TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) REZONE APRIL 2018 Prepared for: 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34113 Prepared by: 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 280-4321 EB 642 20170078-000 STATEMENT OF CERTIFICATION I certify that this TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Joshua J. Hildebrand, P.E. PTOE Florida License No. 73952 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Collaborators: Leah M. Holmes, E.I. Zachary L. Stone, E.I. Joshua J. Hildebrand, P.E., PTOE Florida License No. 73952 Date -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.......................................................................................... 1 3.0 AREA CONDITION .......................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Site Access.............................................................................................................. 5 3.2 Surrounding Roadway Network ............................................................................. 5 3.3 Committed Improvements ...................................................................................... 5 4.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC..................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Site Traffic.............................................................................................................. 5 5.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION....................................................................................................... 6 6.0 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION.................................................................................... 10 6.1 Bi-Directional Traffic Counts............................................................................... 10 6.2 Intersection Turning Movement Counts............................................................... 10 7.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 10 7.1 Capacity................................................................................................................ 10 7.2 Turn Lane Analysis............................................................................................... 11 8.0 IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 12 9.0 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................... 13 APPENDICES Appendix A Amended Developer Contribution Agreement Appendix B Traffic Impact Study Methodology Statement Appendix C ITE Trip Generation Appendix D FDOT Traffic Online Count Stations Appendix E Excerpt from Collier County 2017 AUIR Appendix F Bi-Directional Traffic Counts Appendix G Turning Movement Counts -ii- FIGURES Figure 2-1 Project Location Map Figure 2-2 Net New Area of Influence Map Figure 5-1 Net New % Project Distributions Figure 5-2 Net New A.M. Peak Hour Project Trips Figure 5-3 Net New P.M. Peak Hour Project Trips TABLES Table 4-1 ITE Trip Generation Maximum Allowed Summary for the Proposed Development Table 5-1 A.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment Table 5-2 P.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment Table 7-1 Capacity Analysis REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 1 - 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this traffic analysis is to assess the potential transportation impacts associated with the PUD rezone for the proposed development of Regal Acres Parcel B. The applicant is requesting a zoning change from the Rural Agricultural (A) and Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning districts to the RPUD zoning district for the project to be known as the Regal Acres II RPUD. The proposed request will add 23.15 acres of property and a maximum of 116 residential dwelling units to the existing Regal Acres Parcel A RPUD, a 184 unit residential development situated on 36.75 acres on the west side of Greenway Road in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. This request will also include consideration and approval of an affordable housing density bonus agreement authorizing the developer to utilize affordable housing bonus density units in the development and the repeal of Ordinance No. 05-36. The Regal Acres RPUD is a project comprised of two (2) separate development parcels delineated on the PUD Master Plan as Parcels “A” and “B”. Parcel “A” is approximately 36.75 acres and is built-out with 184 multi-family dwelling units, accessory recreational facilities, and supportive infrastructure. Parcel “B” is approximately 23.15 acres and will develop as a residential community with a maximum of 116 dwelling units. This report documents the estimated traffic impacts resulting from a total site build-out of Parcel B on 23.15 acres of property consisting of 116 residential units. Also, the development is in the US 41 developers consortium for the US 41 widening and intersection improvements at the CR 951 and US 41 intersection. These improvements consist of intersection improvements at the intersection of CR 951 and US 41, six-lane road improvements from the intersection of CR 951 and US 41 to Henderson Creek, and four-lane road improvements from Henderson Creek to 0.25 miles east of Naples Reserve Blvd, please see Appendix A for a copy of the developers agreement. Additionally, a methodology statement outlining the parameters of the study is provided in Appendix B. 2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The project includes 23.15 acres of community and housing to be added on to the 36.75 acres of existing property with an anticipated build out year of 2022. The project is located on a parcel of land in Collier County off of Greenway Road (see Figure 2-1). The project study limits were determined based on the 2%, 2%, 3% rule in accordance with Collier County’s TIS Guidelines and Procedures (Resolution No. 2006-299). As defined by Collier County, the significantly impacted links and intersections are defined as: x Trips distributed on links directly accessed by the project where the project traffic by direction is equal to or exceeds 2% of the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard. REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 2 - x Trips on one link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project where the project traffic by direction is equal to or greater than 2% the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard. x Trips on all subsequent links where the project traffic by direction is equal to or greater than 3% the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard. Figure 2-2 depicts the project location and area of influence as determined by these guidelines. REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 3 - Figure 2-1: Project Location Map REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 4 - Figure 2-2: Net New Area of Influence Map REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 5 - 3.0 AREA CONDITION 3.1 Site Access An existing site access to Regal Acres Parcel A is located off Greenway Road and will serve as the site access to Regal Acres Parcel B. 3.2 Surrounding Roadway Network Greenway Road Located east of the project site, Greenway Road is a north-south two lane undivided local roadway with a 30 mph posted speed limit. Greenway Road terminates at Tamiami Trail East to the south and at a residential community to the north. Tamiami Trial East South of the project site, Tamiami Trail East is a north-south four lane divided arterial with a 60 mph posted speed limit. 3.3 Committed Improvements There are currently no committed improvements at this time. 4.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC 4.1 Site Traffic The maximum allowable A.M.peak hour, P.M.peak hour,and daily trip generations for the project were estimated using trip generation rates obtained from the ITE Trip Generation (Ninth Edition). The ITE trip generation estimates are summarized in Table 4-1 and included in Appendix C. Table 4-1: ITE Trip Generation Maximum Allowed Summary for the Proposed Development Project ITE Land Use Dwelling Units A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Existing Regal Acres Parcel A ITE LUC 230 - Multi- Family(1)184 100 21 121 81 40 121 808 Proposed Regal Acres Parcel B ITE LUC 210 - Single Family House(2)116 23 68 91 76 44 120 1,204 Total Trips 123 89 212 157 84 241 2,012 Total Net New Parcel B Trips 23 68 91 76 44 120 1,204 Footnotes: (1) ITE Trip Generation from Existing Regal Acres PPL Traffic Impact Statement Regal Acres prepared by Vanasse & Daylor LLP dated April 3, 2008 (2) ITE LUC 210 Single Family Home, ITE Trip Generation Standard Equations REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 6 - Proposed Regal Acres Parcel B LUC 210 ITE Equations: AM: T=0.70(X)+9.74; PM: Ln(T)=0.90Ln(X)+0.51; Daily: Ln(T)=0.92Ln(X)+2.72 5.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The net new project trip distributions were estimated from existing traffic patterns of the surrounding roadway network and logical assumptions based on the FDOT Traffic Online Count Stations 0005 and 0194 (see Appendix D). The distributions based on these conditions are depicted in Figure 5-1. In conjunction with the traffic data from the Florida Traffic Online, the 2017 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) (see Appendix E) was utilized to estimate traffic distributions and the capacity for each of the segments to be analyzed in this report. Based on the trip distributions, the project’s A.M. and P.M. peak hour estimated traffic volumes were assigned to the surrounding road network and are shown in Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3. This analysis is provided for the purpose of assessing the peak hour and peak direction Level of Service (LOS) on the roads directly serving the project site. Results are shown in Table 5-1 and Table 5- 2. Table 5-1: A.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment Segment Number Roadway Name From/To (Segment) Trip Distribution (Enter - Exit) A.M. Peak Project Trips (Enter -Exit) Service Volume(1) % Service Volume (Enter - Exit) 95.1 Tamiami Trail East Collier Boulevard - Joseph Lane 72% - 72% 17 - 49 3,100 0.55% - 1.58% 95.2 Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane - Greenway Road 72% - 72% 17 - 49 2,000 0.85% - 2.45% 95.3 Tamiami Trail East Greenway Road - San Marco Drive 28% - 28% 6 - 19 1,075 0.56% - 1.77% Footnote: (1) 2017 Collier County AUIR Table 5-2: P.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment Segment Number Roadway Name From/To (Segment) Trip Distribution (Enter - Exit) P.M. Peak Project Trips (Enter -Exit) Service Volume(1) % Service Volume (Enter - Exit) 95.1 Tamiami Trail East Collier Boulevard - Joseph Lane 72% - 72% 55 - 32 3,100 1.77% - 1.03% 95.2 Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane - Greenway Road 72% - 72% 55 - 32 2,000 2.75% - 1.60% 95.3 Tamiami Trail East Greenway Road - San Marco Drive 28% - 28% 21 - 12 1,075 1.95% - 1.12% Footnote: (1) 2017 Collier County AUIR REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 7 - Figure 5-1: Net New % Project Distributions REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 8 - Figure 5-2: Net New A.M. Peak Hour Project Trips REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 9 - Figure 5-3: Net New P.M. Peak Hour Project Trips REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 10 - 6.0 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION To establish base existing traffic volumes and trip distributions on Greenway Road data was obtained from the sources listed herein. 6.1 Bi-Directional Traffic Counts From April9, 2018to April12,2018,two sets of 24-hour bi-directional data collectors were placed on Greenway Road, just south of Majestic Circle and just north of Kingdom Court. The primary purpose of these counts was to document the southbound through movements at the intersection of Majestic Circle and Greenway Road.Appendix A documents the findings of the preliminary traffic counts (see Appendix F). 6.2 Intersection Turning Movement Counts Turning movement counts were recorded on April 10, 2018 from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. (see Appendix G). The counts were performed by Johnson Engineering at the following private entrances on Greenway Road: x Greenway Road at the Synegenta Seeds Inc. entrance x Greenway Road at Majestic Circle x Greenway Road at Kingdom Court 7.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 7.1 Capacity As demonstrated in Table 6-1 of this report and in accordance with Collier County Concurrency Management rules, future roadway conditions will accommodate the proposed project traffic at the 5-year horizon. Capacity analysis was performed by projecting the 2017 peak hour peak direction volume for each link to the 2022 project horizon year using growth rates from historical FDOT counts. Historical traffic counts reflected a growth rate lower than 2%, therefore a 2% minimum growth rate was utilized. Peak direction peak hour project generated trips were then added to the 2022 background directional volumes. The 2022 projected background plus project generated trips was then subtracted from the directional service volume to yield the remaining trips. REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 11 - Table 7-1: Capacity Analysis Segment Number Roadway Name From/To (Segment) Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volume(1) 2017 Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume(1) Growth Rate(2) 2022 5-Year Horizon Peak Hour Peak Direction Background Trips Site Generated Trips Remaining Trips 95.2 Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane - Greenway Road 2,000 770 2% 850 55 1,095 95.3 Tamiami Trail East Greenway Road - San Marco Drive 1,075 770 2% 850 21 204 Footnotes: (1) 2017 Collier County AUIR (2) 2% Minimum Used Based on Florida Traffic Online Historical Counts 7.2 Turn Lane Analysis Per the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Public Right-of- Way, left turn lanes are required on two lane roads when the peak hour left turning movement is greater than 20 vehicles. Right turn lanes are required on two lane roads when the right turning movement is greater than 40 vehicles during the peak hour. On multilane roads, left turn lanes are required at all median openings and right turn lanes are required at all driveways. Both the existing and future anticipated number of left turning movements at Greenway Road and the project’s entrance at Majestic Circle exceed the turning movement thresholds per Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3. The Regal Acres project boundary lies toward the northern terminus of Greenway Road along with the Naples Reserve Community and Synegenta Seeds Inc. The Naples Reserve Transportation Impact Study dated February 13, 2012, estimated 125 p.m. peak outbound trips from the Naples Reserve development onto Greenway Road at the development build-out. During April 10, 2018 p.m. peak hour turning movement counts collected by Johnson Engineering, Inc., two (2) outbound construction vehicles were observed from the Naples Reserve development. The p.m. peak outbound trips from Synegenta Seeds Inc., and Kingdom Court onto Greenway Road was 25 trips. Based on the location of the existing Majestic Circle entrance in relation to the Greenway Road northern terminus, the existing Greenway Road right-of-way constraints, and the lack of applicant owned property on either side of Greenway Road, a waiver to not require a left turn lane at from Greenway Road onto Majestic Circle and to not provide compensating right-of-way are being requested as part of the Regal Acres Parcel B RPUD rezoning request. REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 12 - 8.0 IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS As depicted in Table 6-1, all significantly impacted roadway links are anticipated to provide an acceptable LOS at project build-out as set forth in the Collier County AUIR. As discussed in section 7.2, the anticipated traffic distributions meet the minimum warrants for turn lanes as specified in the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Public Right-of-Way, however based on the location of the existing Majestic Circle entrance in relation to the Greenway Road northern terminus, the existing Greenway Road right-of-way constraints, and the lack of applicant owned property on either side of Greenway Road, a waiver to not require a left turn lane at from Greenway Road onto Majestic Circle and to not provide compensating right-of-way are being requested as part of the Regal Acres Parcel B RPUD rezoning request. REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APRIL 2018 - 13 - 9.0 CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions have been based on the analyses in this traffic study: 1. The project will generate an estimated net new 91 A.M. peak hour trips, 120 P.M. peak hour trips, and 1,204 daily trips. 2. All roadway segments surrounding the project site are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS at project build-out. No additional roadway improvements are recommended. 3. Per the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Public Right-of-Way, left turn lanes are required on two lane roads when the peak hour left turning movement is greater than 20 vehicles. Right turn lanes are required on two lane roads when the right turning movement is greater than 40 vehicles during the peak hour. On multilane roads, left turn lanes are required at all median openings and right turn lanes are required at all driveways. Both the existing and future anticipated number of left turning movements at Greenway Road and the project’s entrance at Majestic Circle exceed the turning movement thresholds per Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3. The Regal Acres project boundary lies toward the northern terminus of Greenway Road along with the Naples Reserve Community and Synegenta Seeds Inc. The Naples Reserve Transportation Impact Study dated February 13, 2012, estimated 125 p.m. peak outbound trips from the Naples Reserve development onto Greenway Road at the development build-out. During April 10, 2018 p.m. peak hour turning movement counts collected by Johnson Engineering, Inc., two (2) outbound construction vehicles were observed from the Naples Reserve development. The p.m. peak outbound trips from Synegenta Seeds Inc., and Kingdom Court onto Greenway Road was 25 trips. Based on the location of the existing Majestic Circle entrance in relation to the Greenway Road northern terminus, the existing Greenway Road right-of-way constraints, and the lack of applicant owned property on either side of Greenway Road, a waiver to not require a left turn lane from Greenway Road onto Majestic Circle and to not provide compensating right- of-way are being requested as part of this rezoning. APPENDIX A AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT APPENDIX B TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY METHODOLOGY STATEMENT APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: August 2, 2017 Time: N/A Location: N/A - Electronic Correspondence Via Email People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Growth Management Division / (239) 252-2361 2) Josh Hildebrand, P.E., Johnson Engineering / (239) 461-2481 3) Leah Holmes, E.I., Johnson Engineering / (239) 461-2445 Study Preparer: Preparer’s Name and Title: Joshua J. Hildebrand, P.E., PTOE Transportation Engineer / Leah Holmes, E.I. Transportation Engineer Intern Organization: Johnson Engineering, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 2350 Stanford Court / Naples, FL 34112 / (239) 434-0333 Reviewer(s): Reviewer’s Name & Title: Michael Sawyer, Project Manager Organization & Telephone Number: Collier County Growth Management Department / (239) 252-2926 Applicant: Applicant’s Name: Habitat for Humanity Address: 11145 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34113 Telephone Number: (239) 775-0036 Proposed Development: Name: Regal Acres II – PUD Rezone Location: Greenway Road, Naples Land Use Type: Residential ITE Code #: 210 Other: N/A Description: Request to rezone from Rural Agricultural (A) and Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning districts to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the Regal Acres II RPUD, to add lands to the existing RPUD for a maximum of 116 additional residential units on 23.15 acres of property; and, consideration and approval of an affordable housing density bonus agreement authorizing the developer to utilize affordable housing bonus density units in the development of this project located on the west side of Greenway Road, east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), and north of U.S. 41, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 05-36. Zoning Existing: Rural Agriculture (A) and Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Comprehensive plan recommendation: N/A Requested: The applicant is requesting a zoning change from the Rural Agricultural (A) and Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning districts to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the Regal Acres II RPUD. Findings of the Preliminary Study: The estimated net new trips exceed 100 two-way peak hour trips, therefore this study qualifies as a Major TIS under the maximum allowable scenario. This TIS will include the A.M. and P.M. peak hour trip generations, as well as the associated trip distributions and project generated trips. The study limits will be determined based on the 2%, 2%, 3% rule in accordance with Collier County’s TIS Guidelines and Procedures. Study Type: Small Scale TIS Minor TIS Major TIS X Study Area: Boundaries: See attached Project Location Map Horizon Year(s): 2022 Analysis Time Period(s): Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Future Off-Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (9th Edition) (See Attached) Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: N/A Pass-by trips: N/A Internal trips (PUD): N/A Transmit use: N/A Other: N/A Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements:2022 Methodology & Assumptions: Non-site traffic estimates: AUIR and FDOT Historic Traffic Information Site-trip generation: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (9th Edition) (See attached) Trip distribution method: Manual Method Traffic assignment method: Manual Method Traffic growth rate: Determined from Historic Traffic Data provided in AUIR or 2% minimum Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: N/A Sight distance: N/A Queuing: N/A. Access location & configuration: Regal Acres II will access Greenway Road via an existing entrance to Regal Acres. Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system location & progression needs: N/A On-site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: Collier County AUIR and FDOT Historic Traffic Data Base maps: N/A Prior study reports: PPL Traffic Impact Statement Regal Acres prepared by Vanasse & Daylor LLP, dated April 3, 2008 Access policy and jurisdiction: Collier County Review process: N/A Requirements: N/A Miscellaneous: N/A =============================================================== SIGNATURES _Joshua J. Hildebrand, P.E. PTOE_______Leah M. Holmes, E.I._________ Study Preparer(s) ________________________________ Reviewer(s) ________________________________ Applicant 1 Jennifer Chrovian From:Joshua Hildebrand Sent:Friday, August 04, 2017 11:52 AM To:Jennifer Chrovian Subject:FW: Regal Acres II RPUD (PL#20170001733) - TIS Methodology Review Request From:SawyerMichael[mailto:MichaelSawyer@colliergov.net] Sent:Wednesday,August02,20172:47PM To:JoshuaHildebrand<jjh@johnsoneng.com> Cc:BaluchStephen<StephenBaluch@colliergov.net>;LauraS.DeJohn<LKS@johnsoneng.com>;LeahM.Holmes <lmh@johnsoneng.com>;JaredR.Brown<jrb@johnsoneng.com> Subject:RE:RegalAcresIIRPUD(PL#20170001733)ͲTISMethodologyReviewRequest Joshua, TISoutlinelooksgood.Thefeecanbesubmittedwiththepetitionapplicationjustprovideanoteonyourcoversheet notingassuch. Thanks, ;ΚΔΙΒΖΝ͑΄ΒΨΪΖΣ͑ Transportation Planning, Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management 2685 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 252-2926 From:JoshuaHildebrand[mailto:jjh@johnsoneng.com] Sent:Wednesday,August02,201711:42AM To:SawyerMichael<MichaelSawyer@colliergov.net> Cc:BaluchStephen<StephenBaluch@colliergov.net>;LauraS.DeJohn<LKS@johnsoneng.com>;LeahM.Holmes <lmh@johnsoneng.com>;JaredR.Brown<jrb@johnsoneng.com> Subject:RegalAcresIIRPUD(PL#20170001733)ͲTISMethodologyReviewRequest Michael, Attachedforyourreview,pleasefindtheproposedTISmethodologyfortheRegalAcresIIRPUD (PL#20170001733),locatedat10291/10407MajesticCir.,NaplesFL34114.Unlessyoufeelthereisreasontomeetin person,weareokaywithestablishingtheTISrequirementsviaelectroniccorrespondence.Acheckintheamountof $500iscurrentlybeingprocessedforthemethodologyreviewfee. Thanks, JoshuaHildebrand,P.E.,PTOE JOHNSONENGINEERING,INC. 2122JohnsonStreet 2 FortMyers,Florida33901 Phone:(239)461Ͳ2481 Fax:(239)334Ͳ3661 Email:jjh@johnsoneng.com Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. APPENDIX C ITE TRIP GENERATION Detailed Land Use DataProject:Open Date:Analysis Date:New Project7/26/20177/26/2017For 116 Dwelling Units of SFHOUSE 1( 210 ) Single-Family Detached HousingDay / PeriodRateAvgRateMinRateMaxDevStdTripsPass-BySizeAvgEnterExit%%Eq.UseEquationR2TripsTotalWeekday Average Daily Trips 9.52 4.31 3.721.85 198 50 50 True Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.72 0.951204 0Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Weekday AM Peak Hour of Generator 0.77 0.33 0.912.27 180 26 74 True T = 0.70(X) + 12.12 0.8993 0Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Weekday AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic 0.75 0.33 0.92.27 194 25 75 True T = 0.70(X) + 9.74 0.8991 0Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Weekday PM Peak Hour of Generator 1.02 0.42 1.052.98 174 64 36 True Ln(T) = 0.88 Ln(X) + 0.62 0.91122 0Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic 1 0.42 1.052.98 207 63 37 True Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51 0.91120 0Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Saturday Average Daily Trips 9.91 5.32 3.7215.25 215 50 50 True Ln(T) = 0.93 Ln(X) + 2.64 0.921165 0Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Saturday Peak Hour of Generator 0.93 0.5 0.991.75 215 54 46 True T = 0.89(X) + 8.77 0.91112 0Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Sunday Average Daily Trips 8.62 4.74 3.3612.31 218 50 50 True T = 8.63(X) - 0.63 0.931000 0Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Sunday Peak Hour of Generator 0.86 0.55 0.951.48 212 53 47 True Ln(T) = 0.91 Ln(X) + 0.31 0.88103 0Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :1TRIP GENERATION 2014, TRAFFICWARE, LLCSource: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, 2012 APPENDIX D FDOT TRAFFIC ONLINE COUNT STATIONS FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2016 HISTORICAL AADT REPORTCOUNTY: 03 - COLLIERSITE: 0194 - SR 90/US 41, SOUTHEAST OF SR 951 CC608YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR---- ---------- ------------ ------------ --------- -------- --------2016 15200 C E 7800 W 7400 9.00 57.40 8.502015 10900 S E 5400 W 5500 9.00 57.20 7.602014 10500 F E 5200 W 5300 9.00 56.50 7.602013 10300 C E 5100 W 5200 9.00 56.00 7.602012 9800 C E 5000 W 4800 9.00 56.20 6.902011 10700 F E 5600 W 5100 9.00 56.50 9.502010 10700 C E 5600 W 5100 10.32 56.59 9.502009 10700 C E 5600 W 5100 11.01 56.34 6.502008 10700 C E 5500 W 5200 11.12 56.68 7.802007 12100 C E 6000 W 6100 11.68 56.38 10.702006 11200 C E 5700 W 5500 11.27 57.97 11.702005 11000 C E 5500 W 5500 11.40 54.70 13.102004 12100 C E 6100 W 6000 11.30 55.30 13.102003 10400 C E 5300 W 5100 11.30 54.00 15.202002 11600 C E 5800 W 5800 10.20 57.20 10.302001 11700 C E 5800 W 5900 10.00 57.70 8.90 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2016 HISTORICAL AADT REPORTCOUNTY: 03 - COLLIERSITE: 0005 - SR 90/US 41, NORTHWEST OF CR 92 CC570YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR---- ---------- ------------ ------------ --------- -------- --------2016 6100 F E 3000 W 3100 9.50 57.40 9.102015 5900 C E 2900 W 3000 9.50 57.20 9.102014 3900 F E 2000 W 1900 9.50 56.50 8.402013 3900 C E 2000 W 1900 9.50 56.00 8.402012 3500 C E 1800 W 1700 9.50 56.20 8.702011 3800 F E 1900 W 1900 9.50 56.50 10.802010 3800 C E 1900 W 1900 10.32 56.59 10.802009 3800 C E 1900 W 1900 11.01 56.34 11.302008 3800 C E 1900 W 1900 11.12 56.68 10.602007 4600 C E 2300 W 2300 11.68 56.38 14.102006 4000 C E 1900 W 2100 11.27 57.97 15.502005 4700 C E 2300 W 2400 11.40 54.70 17.802004 5000 C E 2400 W 2600 11.30 55.30 10.902003 4500 C E 2400 W 2100 11.30 54.00 10.902002 4900 C E 2400 W 2500 12.30 56.30 10.902001 4600 C E 2300 W 2300 10.00 57.70 14.70 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES APPENDIX E EXCERPT FROM COLLIER COUNTY 2017AUIR 2015 2016 20172016 20162017Traffic 1/7th TripPeak Hour Peak Peak Peak2017 20172017 1/7th 1/7th TBCount BankPeak Dir Hour Hour Hour Actual Percent2017 1/7th Total 1/7th TB2017 L Year YearExist Cnt. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Variation VariationTrip Trip Trip2017 Remain.1/7th TBO Expected ExpectedID# CIE# Proj# Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std Dir Volume Volume Volume Volume To Volume To VolumeBank Bank BankVolume Capacity V/C S Deficient Deficient45 5444.0 71 60018 CR846 Immokalee Road Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 6D 674 E E 3,300 1650 1620 1620 0 0.00% 282 265 547 2167 1133 65.7% C45.0 71 60018 CR846 Immokalee Road Wilson Boulevard Oil Well Road 6D 675 E E 3,300 1810 1830 1890 60 3.28% 224 205 429 2319 981 70.3% C46.0 73 60165 CR846 Immokalee Road Oil Well Road SR 29 2U 672 D E 900 320 370 390 20 5.41% 29 102 131 521 379 57.9% C47.0 66 99903 Lake Trafford Road Carson Rd SR 29 2U 609 D E 800 460 470 470 0 0.00% 38 0 38 508 292 63.5% C48.0 60166 Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 2U 587 D N 1,000 530 610 710 100 16.39% 16 19 35 745 255 74.5% C49.0 22 68051 Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevard 4D 588 D S 1,900 1350 1410 1570 160 11.35% 0 0 0 1570 330 82.6% D 202350.0 79 60166 Logan Boulevard Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 644 D N 1,000 470 590 560(30) -5.08%0 30 30 590 410 59.0% C51.0 21 65041 CR881 Livingston Road Imperial Street Immokalee Road 6/4D 673 D N 3,000 1170 1160 1180 20 1.72% 99 0 99 1279 1721 42.6% B52.0 57 62071 CR881 Livingston Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 576 E N 3,100 1620 1610 1610 0 0.00% 38 0 38 1648 1452 53.2% C53.0 58 62071 CR881 Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 6D 575 E S 3,100 1480 1450 1480 30 2.07% 18 0 18 1498 1602 48.3% B54.0 52 60071 CR881 Livingston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 690 E N 3,100 1440 1470 1470 0 0.00% 34 0 34 1504 1596 48.5% B55.0 53 60061 CR881 Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 687 E N 3,000 1220 1220 1270 50 4.10% 39 0 39 1309 1691 43.6% B58.0 67 99904 N. 1st Street New Market Road SR-29 (Main Street) 2U 590 D N 900 540 550 590 40 7.27% 0 0 0 590 310 65.6% C59.0 New Market Road Broward Street SR 29 2U 612 D E 900 470 520 570 50 9.62% 0 0 0 570 330 63.3% C61.0 36 Camp Keais Oil Well Road Immokalee Road 2U 626A D S 1,000 220 220 190(30) -13.64%0 108 108 298 702 29.8% B62.0 68 99905 CR887 Old US 41 Lee County Line US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 547 D N 1,000 960 960 1050 90 9.38% 37 0 37 1087(87)108.7% F 2018 Existing63.0 99924 CR896 Seagate Drive Crayton Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 4D 511 D E 1,700 980 970 970 0 0.00% 0 0 0 970 730 57.1% C64.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 512 E E 2,800 1880 1870 1860(10) -0.53%6 0 6 1866 934 66.6% C65.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Goodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street 6D 514 E W 2,800 1910 1940 1970 30 1.55% 1 0 1 1971 829 70.4% C66.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Shirley Street Airport Road 6D 515 E E 2,800 2230 2250 2390 140 6.22% 52 0 52 2442 358 87.2% D 202567.1 41 60111 CR846 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road Livingston Road 6D 526 E E 3,000 2660 2660 2550(110) -4.14%35 0 35 2585 415 86.2% D 202567.2 41 60111 CR846 Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road I-75 6D 628 E E 3,000 2960 2950 2990 40 1.36% 103 0 103 3093(93)103.1% F 2018 Existing68.0 41 99907 CR896 Pine Ridge Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 6D 600 E E 2,800 2080 2130 2120(10) -0.47%1 0 1 2121 679 75.8% D69.0 15 65032 CR856 Radio Road Airport Road Livingston Road 4D 544 D E 1,800 1110 1120 1180 60 5.36% 15 0 15 1195 605 66.4% C70.0 15 65033 CR856 Radio Road Livingston Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 527 D E 1,800 1120 1110 1130 20 1.80% 26 0 26 1156 644 64.2% C71.0 16 65031 CR856 Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard 4D 685 D W 1,800 540 580 630 50 8.62% 0 85 85 715 1085 39.7% B72.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Charlemagne Boulevard 4D 516 D W 1,800 1000 1010 1010 0 0.00% 0 55 55 1065 735 59.2% C73.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Charlemagne Boulevard County Barn Road 4D 517 D W 1,800 700 700 740 40 5.71% 0 48 48 788 1012 43.8% B74.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road County Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 534 D W 1,900 670 670 700 30 4.48% 0 40 40 740 1160 38.9% B75.0 77 60169 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 518 E W 2,900 500 490 490 0 0.00% 56 115 171 661 2239 22.8%B76.0 56 62081B Santa Barbara Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway 4D 529 D N 2,100 1230 1240 1270 30 2.42% 0 0 0 1270 830 60.5% C77.0 56 62081A Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 528 E N 3,100 1740 1780 1810 30 1.69% 54 0 54 1864 1236 60.1% C78.0 56 62081A Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 537 E N 3,100 1290 1290 1350 60 4.65% 213 0 213 1563 1537 50.4% B79.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake-Hammock Road 6D 702 E S 3,100 840 930 890(40) -4.30%112 0 112 1002 2098 32.3% B80.0 SR29 SR 29 US 41 (Tamiami Trail) CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) 2U 615A D N 900 120 90 150 60 66.67% 0 0 0 150 750 16.7% B81.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) I-75 2U 615A D N 900 120 90 150 60 66.67% 0 0 0 150 750 16.7% B82.0 SR29 SR 29 I-75 Oil Well Road 2U 615A D N 900 120 90 150 60 66.67% 8 61 69 219 681 24.3% B83.0 SR29 SR 29 Oil Well Road CR 29A South 2U 665A D N 900 280 380 410 30 7.89% 0 0 0 410 490 45.6% B84.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A South 9th Street 4D 664 D W 1,700 550 600 600 0 0.00% 12 0 12 612 1088 36.0% B85.0 SR29 SR 29 9th Street CR 29A North 2U 663 D S 900 560 620 620 0 0.00% 21 0 21 641 259 71.2% C86.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A North SR 82 2U 663 D S 900 560 620 620 0 0.00% 0 0 0 620 280 68.9% C87.0 SR29 SR 29 Hendry County Line SR 82 2U 591A D S800340 350 360 10 2.86% 0 0 0 360 440 45.0% B88.0 SR82 SR 82 Lee County Line SR 29 2U 661A D S800690 710 650(60) -8.45%8 0 8 658 142 82.3% D 202791.0 43 US41 Tamiami Trail East Davis Boulevard Airport Road 6D 545 E E2,9001700 1580 1700 120 7.59% 23 47 70 1770 1130 61.0% C92.0 47 US41 Tamiami Trail East Airport Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 604 E E2,9002320 2240 2300 60 2.68% 13 248 261 2561 339 88.3% D 202493.0 46 US41 Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Road Triangle Boulevard 6D 572 E E 3,000 1910 1960 1860(100) -5.10%15 329 344 2204 796 73.5% C94.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Triangle Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 571 E E3,0001490 1510 1620 110 7.28% 0 203 203 1823 1177 60.8% C95.1 US41 Tamiami Trail East Collier Boulevard Joseph Lane 6D 608 D E3,100670 670 770 100 14.93% 134 107 241 1011 2089 32.6% B95.2 US41 Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane Greenway Road 4D 608 D E2,000670 670 770 100 14.93% 53 102 155 925 1075 46.3% B95.3 US41 Tamiami Trail East Greenway Road San Marco Drive 2U 608 D E1,075670 670 770 100 14.93% 53 4 57 827 248 76.9% D 202796.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East San Marco Drive SR 29 2U 617A D E1,000220 140 240 100 71.43% 0 0 0 240 760 24.0% B97.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East SR 29 Dade County Line 2U 616A D E1,000190 150 210 60 40.00% 0 0 0 210 790 21.0% B98.0 71 US41 Tamiami Trail North Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 6D 546 E N3,1001990 1990 2090 100 5.03% 97 8 105 2195 905 70.8% C99.0 50 US41 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalee Road 6D 564 E N 3,100 2530 2560 2890 330 12.89% 29 8 37 2927 173 94.4% D 2021 2020100.0 45 US41 Tamiami Trail North Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 577 E N3,1002060 2280 2320 40 1.75% 18 0 18 2338 762 75.4% D101.0 45 US41 Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive 6D 563 E N3,1002300 2300 2330 30 1.30% 3 0 3 2333 767 75.3% D102.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Gulf Park Drive Pine Ridge Road 6D 562 E N3,1001860 1860 1900 40 2.15% 2 0 2 1902 1198 61.4% CMASTER 2017.xlsm APPENDIX F BI-DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC COUNTS Page 2 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 06-Apr-18 Total Time Fri Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM * ** 12:15 *** 12:30 * ** 12:45 *** 01:00 * ** 01:15 *** 01:30 * ** 01:45 *** 02:00 * ** 02:15 *** 02:30 * ** 02:45 *** 03:00 14 6 20 03:15 16 15 31 03:30 11 18 29 03:45 26 20 46 04:00 12 19 31 04:15 17 5 22 04:30 21 10 31 04:45 17 12 29 05:00 14 15 29 05:15 23 7 30 05:30 20 10 30 05:45 14 13 27 06:00 12 7 19 06:15 18 14 32 06:30 13 10 23 06:45 14 8 22 07:00 11 8 19 07:15 16 8 24 07:30 14 10 24 07:45 13 7 20 08:00 11 9 20 08:15 13 8 21 08:30 14 12 26 08:45 5 7 12 09:00 12 8 20 09:15 14 7 21 09:30 11 5 16 09:45 5 7 12 10:00 11 7 18 10:15 8 1 9 10:30 7 2 9 10:45 6 3 9 11:00 14 4 18 11:15 10 2 12 11:30 10 3 13 11:45 13 3 16 Total 480 310 790 Percent 60.8% 39.2% Peak -15:45 15:15 ------15:15 Vol. - 76 72 - - - - - - 137 P.H.F. 0.731 0.900 0.745 Page 3 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 07-Apr-18 Total Time Sat Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 8 1 9 12:15 5 1 6 12:30 4 1 5 12:45 2 0 2 01:00 2 1 3 01:15 4 1 5 01:30 1 0 1 01:45 2 0 2 02:00 3 1 4 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 1 1 2 02:45 4 0 4 03:00 3 1 4 03:15 1 2 3 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 1 0 1 04:00 1 2 3 04:15 0 4 4 04:30 1 1 2 04:45 0 2 2 05:00 1 4 5 05:15 2 5 7 05:30 1 9 10 05:45 1 1 2 06:00 1 9 10 06:15 3 14 17 06:30 4 7 11 06:45 11 11 22 07:00 6 11 17 07:15 5 12 17 07:30 6 19 25 07:45 4 8 12 08:00 2 10 12 08:15 2 10 12 08:30 8 12 20 08:45 6 21 27 09:00 7 16 23 09:15 10 9 19 09:30 6 17 23 09:45 2 8 10 10:00 5 12 17 10:15 6 13 19 10:30 8 12 20 10:45 12 12 24 11:00 7 6 13 11:15 9 7 16 11:30 12 7 19 11:45 8 9 17 Total 198 310 508 Percent 39.0% 61.0% Peak -10:45 08:45 ------08:45 Vol. - 40 63 - - - - - - 92 P.H.F. 0.833 0.750 0.852 Page 4 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 07-Apr-18 Total Time Sat Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 12 12 24 12:15 12 9 21 12:30 11 9 20 12:45 10 13 23 01:00 7 15 22 01:15 10 18 28 01:30 9 8 17 01:45 11 7 18 02:00 11 15 26 02:15 14 5 19 02:30 8 17 25 02:45 10 8 18 03:00 15 9 24 03:15 11 16 27 03:30 10 18 28 03:45 12 12 24 04:00 13 4 17 04:15 12 9 21 04:30 20 13 33 04:45 11 10 21 05:00 13 6 19 05:15 9 9 18 05:30 15 8 23 05:45 7 11 18 06:00 9 9 18 06:15 19 14 33 06:30 7 9 16 06:45 18 8 26 07:00 19 6 25 07:15 11 10 21 07:30 9 6 15 07:45 9 7 16 08:00 12 9 21 08:15 11 5 16 08:30 8 17 25 08:45 12 12 24 09:00 13 6 19 09:15 8 8 16 09:30 8 4 12 09:45 8 6 14 10:00 14 3 17 10:15 14 7 21 10:30 13 5 18 10:45 2 3 5 11:00 13 5 18 11:15 6 5 11 11:30 9 4 13 11:45 6 2 8 Total 531 431 962 Percent 55.2% 44.8% Peak -18:15 12:30 ------15:00 Vol. - 63 55 - - - - - - 103 P.H.F. 0.788 0.764 0.920 Page 5 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 08-Apr-18 Total Time Sun Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 11 2 13 12:15 5 3 8 12:30 7 0 7 12:45 7 1 8 01:00 2 0 2 01:15 4 1 5 01:30 1 2 3 01:45 1 0 1 02:00 1 0 1 02:15 1 0 1 02:30 5 2 7 02:45 3 2 5 03:00 3 1 4 03:15 1 0 1 03:30 2 1 3 03:45 2 1 3 04:00 0 1 1 04:15 0 1 1 04:30 0 4 4 04:45 1 3 4 05:00 1 3 4 05:15 1 2 3 05:30 2 6 8 05:45 2 6 8 06:00 2 4 6 06:15 2 6 8 06:30 1 1 2 06:45 2 8 10 07:00 0 2 2 07:15 4 5 9 07:30 5 11 16 07:45 3 5 8 08:00 4 4 8 08:15 6 14 20 08:30 2 11 13 08:45 3 19 22 09:00 4 11 15 09:15 4 17 21 09:30 6 11 17 09:45 12 11 23 10:00 4 14 18 10:15 4 8 12 10:30 8 11 19 10:45 5 10 15 11:00 4 10 14 11:15 5 10 15 11:30 5 9 14 11:45 8 3 11 Total 166 257 423 Percent 39.2% 60.8% Peak -12:00 08:30 ------09:15 Vol. - 30 58 - - - - - - 79 P.H.F. 0.682 0.763 0.859 Page 6 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 08-Apr-18 Total Time Sun Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 4 6 10 12:15 13 16 29 12:30 18 7 25 12:45 14 11 25 01:00 9 9 18 01:15 12 8 20 01:30 8 11 19 01:45 12 10 22 02:00 15 10 25 02:15 11 11 22 02:30 11 9 20 02:45 8 10 18 03:00 12 13 25 03:15 11 15 26 03:30 6 9 15 03:45 17 13 30 04:00 6 7 13 04:15 8 8 16 04:30 9 12 21 04:45 18 8 26 05:00 2 9 11 05:15 10 12 22 05:30 16 12 28 05:45 16 14 30 06:00 14 9 23 06:15 9 7 16 06:30 11 13 24 06:45 10 7 17 07:00 8 7 15 07:15 11 10 21 07:30 8 8 16 07:45 11 5 16 08:00 12 7 19 08:15 11 10 21 08:30 11 6 17 08:45 12 10 22 09:00 19 8 27 09:15 17 4 21 09:30 10 2 12 09:45 8 4 12 10:00 11 8 19 10:15 16 4 20 10:30 8 6 14 10:45 10 2 12 11:00 6 4 10 11:15 5 3 8 11:30 8 2 10 11:45 8 0 8 Total 520 396 916 Percent 56.8% 43.2% Peak -20:30 15:00 ------17:15 Vol. - 59 50 - - - - - - 103 P.H.F. 0.776 0.833 0.858 Page 7 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 09-Apr-18 Total Time Mon Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 9 2 11 12:15 1 1 2 12:30 2 2 4 12:45 4 1 5 01:00 1 1 2 01:15 1 0 1 01:30 4 0 4 01:45 1 1 2 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 1 0 1 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 1 0 1 03:00 1 2 3 03:15 0 2 2 03:30 1 0 1 03:45 0 1 1 04:00 1 3 4 04:15 1 2 3 04:30 0 4 4 04:45 1 6 7 05:00 0 3 3 05:15 3 5 8 05:30 1 10 11 05:45 3 8 11 06:00 0 15 15 06:15 4 21 25 06:30 12 18 30 06:45 21 24 45 07:00 6 14 20 07:15 11 28 39 07:30 5 38 43 07:45 7 22 29 08:00 14 18 32 08:15 13 18 31 08:30 10 19 29 08:45 7 13 20 09:00 7 12 19 09:15 5 12 17 09:30 8 6 14 09:45 2 6 8 10:00 3 6 9 10:15 8 6 14 10:30 8 13 21 10:45 14 6 20 11:00 6 8 14 11:15 12 5 17 11:30 9 7 16 11:45 11 8 19 Total 240 397 637 Percent 37.7% 62.3% Peak -06:30 07:15 ------06:45 Vol. - 50 106 - - - - - - 147 P.H.F. 0.595 0.697 0.817 Page 8 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 09-Apr-18 Total Time Mon Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 4 14 18 12:15 9 5 14 12:30 6 8 14 12:45 21 8 29 01:00 12 7 19 01:15 9 10 19 01:30 10 11 21 01:45 8 9 17 02:00 6 9 15 02:15 11 8 19 02:30 15 22 37 02:45 15 9 24 03:00 17 9 26 03:15 15 9 24 03:30 15 26 41 03:45 18 22 40 04:00 24 11 35 04:15 17 9 26 04:30 18 17 35 04:45 26 18 44 05:00 24 19 43 05:15 19 16 35 05:30 24 12 36 05:45 19 18 37 06:00 22 10 32 06:15 7 13 20 06:30 16 10 26 06:45 11 14 25 07:00 14 11 25 07:15 15 11 26 07:30 18 13 31 07:45 16 14 30 08:00 6 12 18 08:15 17 13 30 08:30 14 10 24 08:45 13 9 22 09:00 9 6 15 09:15 9 8 17 09:30 17 4 21 09:45 10 6 16 10:00 14 3 17 10:15 14 2 16 10:30 11 4 15 10:45 9 1 10 11:00 4 2 6 11:15 7 2 9 11:30 9 3 12 11:45 2 1 3 Total 646 488 1134 Percent 57.0% 43.0% Peak -16:45 16:30 ------16:45 Vol. - 93 70 - - - - - - 158 P.H.F. 0.894 0.673 0.898 Page 9 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 10-Apr-18 Total Time Tue Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 4 1 5 12:15 6 0 6 12:30 4 2 6 12:45 1 1 2 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 1 0 1 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 1 1 2 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 1 1 2 03:00 1 2 3 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 1 1 2 03:45 3 2 5 04:00 1 4 5 04:15 0 4 4 04:30 0 6 6 04:45 1 6 7 05:00 4 5 9 05:15 0 7 7 05:30 2 9 11 05:45 4 6 10 06:00 1 17 18 06:15 6 23 29 06:30 11 19 30 06:45 18 24 42 07:00 9 19 28 07:15 11 31 42 07:30 16 38 54 07:45 6 18 24 08:00 12 21 33 08:15 16 13 29 08:30 10 15 25 08:45 12 12 24 09:00 5 7 12 09:15 *** 09:30 * ** 09:45 *** 10:00 * ** 10:15 *** 10:30 * ** 10:45 *** 11:00 * ** 11:15 *** 11:30 * ** 11:45 *** Total 168 315 483 Percent 34.8% 65.2% Peak -06:45 06:45 ------06:45 Vol. - 54 112 - - - - - - 166 P.H.F. 0.750 0.737 0.769 Grand Total 2949 2904 5853 Percent 50.4% 49.6% ADT ADT 1,572 AADT 1,572 Page 1 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 10-Apr-18 Total Time Tue Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM * ** 12:15 *** 12:30 * ** 12:45 *** 01:00 * ** 01:15 *** 01:30 * ** 01:45 *** 02:00 * ** 02:15 *** 02:30 * ** 02:45 *** 03:00 * ** 03:15 *** 03:30 * ** 03:45 *** 04:00 * ** 04:15 *** 04:30 * ** 04:45 *** 05:00 * ** 05:15 *** 05:30 * ** 05:45 *** 06:00 * ** 06:15 *** 06:30 * ** 06:45 *** 07:00 * ** 07:15 *** 07:30 * ** 07:45 *** 08:00 * ** 08:15 *** 08:30 * ** 08:45 *** 09:00 * ** 09:15 *** 09:30 * ** 09:45 *** 10:00 * ** 10:15 *** 10:30 * ** 10:45 *** 11:00 3 13 16 11:15 12 10 22 11:30 10 9 19 11:45 12 6 18 Total 37 38 75 Percent 49.3% 50.7% Peak -11:00 11:00 ------11:00 Vol. - 37 38 - - - - - - 75 P.H.F. 0.771 0.731 0.852 Page 2 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 10-Apr-18 Total Time Tue Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 5 12 17 12:15 9 7 16 12:30 9 9 18 12:45 8 8 16 01:00 6 5 11 01:15 9 6 15 01:30 8 7 15 01:45 12 11 23 02:00 5 5 10 02:15 11 13 24 02:30 9 15 24 02:45 13 17 30 03:00 23 9 32 03:15 15 15 30 03:30 19 18 37 03:45 17 13 30 04:00 14 20 34 04:15 22 15 37 04:30 21 13 34 04:45 15 11 26 05:00 19 10 29 05:15 29 12 41 05:30 20 23 43 05:45 14 16 30 06:00 22 9 31 06:15 12 11 23 06:30 26 12 38 06:45 12 15 27 07:00 14 7 21 07:15 13 8 21 07:30 13 2 15 07:45 7 8 15 08:00 7 4 11 08:15 15 9 24 08:30 15 10 25 08:45 14 10 24 09:00 10 7 17 09:15 12 3 15 09:30 9 5 14 09:45 11 3 14 10:00 10 6 16 10:15 14 5 19 10:30 15 5 20 10:45 8 2 10 11:00 7 2 9 11:15 9 3 12 11:30 6 3 9 11:45 7 2 9 Total 620 441 1061 Percent 58.4% 41.6% Peak -17:15 15:15 ------17:15 Vol. - 85 66 - - - - - - 145 P.H.F. 0.733 0.825 0.843 Page 3 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 11-Apr-18 Total Time Wed Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 2 1 3 12:15 1 1 2 12:30 1 1 2 12:45 1 1 2 01:00 3 0 3 01:15 1 0 1 01:30 1 1 2 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 1 0 1 02:30 1 0 1 02:45 3 1 4 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 1 1 2 03:30 0 2 2 03:45 1 0 1 04:00 0 3 3 04:15 0 1 1 04:30 1 6 7 04:45 0 2 2 05:00 3 5 8 05:15 1 5 6 05:30 0 8 8 05:45 3 7 10 06:00 3 14 17 06:15 6 24 30 06:30 12 24 36 06:45 19 20 39 07:00 5 20 25 07:15 16 28 44 07:30 14 38 52 07:45 7 28 35 08:00 10 22 32 08:15 16 13 29 08:30 8 13 21 08:45 6 11 17 09:00 6 7 13 09:15 6 6 12 09:30 5 8 13 09:45 5 8 13 10:00 13 12 25 10:15 2 8 10 10:30 7 11 18 10:45 8 9 17 11:00 4 10 14 11:15 14 7 21 11:30 6 5 11 11:45 9 6 15 Total 232 398 630 Percent 36.8% 63.2% Peak -06:45 07:15 ------07:15 Vol. - 54 116 - - - - - - 163 P.H.F. 0.711 0.763 0.784 Page 4 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 11-Apr-18 Total Time Wed Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 9 9 18 12:15 4 7 11 12:30 7 2 9 12:45 7 10 17 01:00 12 12 24 01:15 9 12 21 01:30 18 9 27 01:45 11 12 23 02:00 12 7 19 02:15 8 11 19 02:30 14 20 34 02:45 11 9 20 03:00 16 6 22 03:15 14 16 30 03:30 22 20 42 03:45 23 22 45 04:00 21 17 38 04:15 10 11 21 04:30 22 18 40 04:45 11 15 26 05:00 16 7 23 05:15 18 19 37 05:30 25 11 36 05:45 20 12 32 06:00 14 14 28 06:15 22 9 31 06:30 17 9 26 06:45 18 10 28 07:00 14 7 21 07:15 9 13 22 07:30 17 11 28 07:45 15 10 25 08:00 12 9 21 08:15 9 8 17 08:30 15 8 23 08:45 13 10 23 09:00 13 10 23 09:15 16 7 23 09:30 15 4 19 09:45 13 7 20 10:00 10 5 15 10:15 12 1 13 10:30 7 3 10 10:45 9 2 11 11:00 5 5 10 11:15 9 2 11 11:30 4 2 6 11:45 4 4 8 Total 632 464 1096 Percent 57.7% 42.3% Peak -17:30 15:15 ------15:15 Vol. - 81 75 - - - - - - 155 P.H.F. 0.810 0.852 0.861 Page 5 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 12-Apr-18 Total Time Thu Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 1 1 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 3 0 3 12:45 4 0 4 01:00 4 2 6 01:15 3 0 3 01:30 1 1 2 01:45 1 0 1 02:00 1 0 1 02:15 2 2 4 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 4 1 5 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 1 2 3 03:30 0 1 1 03:45 2 0 2 04:00 0 2 2 04:15 0 4 4 04:30 1 3 4 04:45 2 4 6 05:00 0 7 7 05:15 0 4 4 05:30 4 9 13 05:45 3 13 16 06:00 1 14 15 06:15 4 25 29 06:30 9 20 29 06:45 19 19 38 07:00 11 15 26 07:15 15 28 43 07:30 8 35 43 07:45 13 27 40 08:00 15 25 40 08:15 18 13 31 08:30 14 10 24 08:45 6 7 13 09:00 8 6 14 09:15 9 16 25 09:30 5 9 14 09:45 3 5 8 10:00 5 7 12 10:15 9 10 19 10:30 6 11 17 10:45 7 9 16 11:00 8 6 14 11:15 *** 11:30 * ** 11:45 *** Total 229 373 602 Percent 38.0% 62.0% Peak -07:45 07:15 ------07:15 Vol. - 60 115 - - - - - - 166 P.H.F. 0.789 0.821 0.965 Grand Total 1750 1714 3464 Percent 50.5% 49.5% ADT ADT 1,725 AADT 1,725 Page 1 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 06-Apr-18 Total Time Fri Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM * ** 12:15 *** 12:30 * ** 12:45 *** 01:00 * ** 01:15 *** 01:30 * ** 01:45 *** 02:00 * ** 02:15 *** 02:30 * ** 02:45 *** 03:00 * ** 03:15 *** 03:30 * ** 03:45 *** 04:00 * ** 04:15 *** 04:30 * ** 04:45 *** 05:00 * ** 05:15 *** 05:30 * ** 05:45 *** 06:00 * ** 06:15 *** 06:30 * ** 06:45 *** 07:00 * ** 07:15 *** 07:30 * ** 07:45 *** 08:00 * ** 08:15 *** 08:30 * ** 08:45 *** 09:00 * ** 09:15 *** 09:30 * ** 09:45 *** 10:00 * ** 10:15 *** 10:30 * ** 10:45 *** 11:00 * ** 11:15 *** 11:30 * ** 11:45 *** Total 0 0 0 Percent 0.0% 0.0% Peak ---------- Vol.---------- P.H.F. Page 2 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 06-Apr-18 Total Time Fri Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM * ** 12:15 *** 12:30 * ** 12:45 *** 01:00 * ** 01:15 *** 01:30 * ** 01:45 *** 02:00 10 7 17 02:15 3 2 5 02:30 1 3 4 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 1 1 03:30 1 9 10 03:45 4 5 9 04:00 0 9 9 04:15 1 0 1 04:30 2 2 4 04:45 1 3 4 05:00 0 4 4 05:15 0 4 4 05:30 2 1 3 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 1 1 2 06:30 3 1 4 06:45 0 1 1 07:00 0 1 1 07:15 1 3 4 07:30 0 1 1 07:45 1 0 1 08:00 0 1 1 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 0 3 3 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 2 0 2 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 1 1 11:45 0 0 0 Total 33 63 96 Percent 34.4% 65.6% Peak -14:00 15:15 ------15:15 Vol. - 14 24 - - - - - - 29 P.H.F. 0.350 0.667 0.725 Page 3 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 07-Apr-18 Total Time Sat Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 1 0 1 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 1 1 2 06:15 0 0 0 06:30 1 1 2 06:45 9 0 9 07:00 2 1 3 07:15 1 0 1 07:30 2 1 3 07:45 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 09:00 1 0 1 09:15 1 1 2 09:30 2 1 3 09:45 0 3 3 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 1 0 1 10:30 0 3 3 10:45 4 3 7 11:00 0 5 5 11:15 2 1 3 11:30 3 0 3 11:45 2 0 2 Total 33 21 54 Percent 61.1% 38.9% Peak -06:45 10:30 ------10:30 Vol. - 14 12 - - - - - - 18 P.H.F. 0.389 0.600 0.643 Page 4 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 07-Apr-18 Total Time Sat Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 2 1 3 12:15 2 2 4 12:30 1 0 1 12:45 0 3 3 01:00 0 1 1 01:15 0 2 2 01:30 0 1 1 01:45 1 1 2 02:00 3 0 3 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 2 2 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 1 1 03:15 2 3 5 03:30 1 4 5 03:45 1 0 1 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 1 0 1 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 1 2 3 05:15 0 5 5 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 1 1 2 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 1 1 2 06:30 1 1 2 06:45 1 0 1 07:00 1 3 4 07:15 3 2 5 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 2 0 2 08:00 0 1 1 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 1 1 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 Total 25 38 63 Percent 39.7% 60.3% Peak -18:30 14:45 ------15:00 Vol. - 6 8 - - - - - - 12 P.H.F. 0.500 0.500 0.600 Page 5 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 08-Apr-18 Total Time Sun Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 1 1 2 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 06:45 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 07:15 1 1 2 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 0 0 0 08:00 1 0 1 08:15 1 0 1 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 1 1 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 0 0 0 10:00 1 2 3 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 1 1 2 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 1 2 3 11:45 1 1 2 Total 8 9 17 Percent 47.1% 52.9% Peak -07:15 10:00 ------10:00 Vol. - 2 3 - - - - - - 5 P.H.F. 0.500 0.375 0.417 Page 6 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 08-Apr-18 Total Time Sun Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 1 0 1 12:15 0 1 1 12:30 1 1 2 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 1 1 2 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 1 1 2 01:45 1 1 2 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 2 1 3 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 1 3 4 03:00 2 2 4 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 1 1 2 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 1 1 04:45 1 1 2 05:00 1 1 2 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 2 2 4 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 1 0 1 06:15 1 1 2 06:30 1 1 2 06:45 0 1 1 07:00 0 0 0 07:15 1 1 2 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 1 0 1 08:00 0 0 0 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 1 0 1 10:30 0 1 1 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 Total 21 22 43 Percent 48.8% 51.2% Peak -14:15 14:15 ------14:15 Vol. - 5 6 - - - - - - 11 P.H.F. 0.625 0.500 0.688 Page 7 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 09-Apr-18 Total Time Mon Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 1 1 2 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 0 0 0 06:30 9 1 10 06:45 17 2 19 07:00 3 2 5 07:15 1 0 1 07:30 1 1 2 07:45 2 1 3 08:00 1 0 1 08:15 4 1 5 08:30 2 0 2 08:45 4 1 5 09:00 3 0 3 09:15 1 2 3 09:30 2 1 3 09:45 0 2 2 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 2 1 3 10:30 5 5 10 10:45 0 1 1 11:00 1 5 6 11:15 7 3 10 11:30 7 0 7 11:45 3 6 9 Total 76 36 112 Percent 67.9% 32.1% Peak -06:30 10:30 ------06:30 Vol. - 30 14 - - - - - - 35 P.H.F. 0.441 0.700 0.461 Page 8 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 09-Apr-18 Total Time Mon Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 1 7 8 12:15 2 2 4 12:30 2 4 6 12:45 17 2 19 01:00 0 3 3 01:15 4 4 8 01:30 1 2 3 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 1 1 2 02:15 3 0 3 02:30 3 2 5 02:45 1 2 3 03:00 1 1 2 03:15 1 1 2 03:30 4 8 12 03:45 0 7 7 04:00 0 4 4 04:15 1 2 3 04:30 2 8 10 04:45 3 6 9 05:00 1 4 5 05:15 0 2 2 05:30 0 1 1 05:45 2 6 8 06:00 0 4 4 06:15 0 0 0 06:30 1 0 1 06:45 3 3 6 07:00 1 1 2 07:15 0 1 1 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 2 1 3 08:00 0 0 0 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 2 0 2 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 1 0 1 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 Total 60 89 149 Percent 40.3% 59.7% Peak -12:30 15:30 ------12:00 Vol. - 23 21 - - - - - - 37 P.H.F. 0.338 0.656 0.487 Page 9 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 10-Apr-18 Total Time Tue Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 1 0 1 06:30 6 1 7 06:45 15 2 17 07:00 8 0 8 07:15 3 3 6 07:30 6 3 9 07:45 3 0 3 08:00 4 1 5 08:15 1 0 1 08:30 2 1 3 08:45 3 1 4 09:00 2 4 6 09:15 *** 09:30 * ** 09:45 *** 10:00 * ** 10:15 *** 10:30 * ** 10:45 *** 11:00 * ** 11:15 *** 11:30 * ** 11:45 *** Total 54 16 70 Percent 77.1% 22.9% Peak -06:30 06:45 ------06:45 Vol. - 32 8 - - - - - - 40 P.H.F. 0.533 0.667 0.588 Grand Total 310 294 604 Percent 51.3% 48.7% ADT ADT 164 AADT 164 Page 2 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 10-Apr-18 Total Time Tue Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 2 4 6 12:15 2 0 2 12:30 2 3 5 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 1 1 2 01:15 2 2 4 01:30 0 2 2 01:45 5 0 5 02:00 2 1 3 02:15 0 1 1 02:30 1 1 2 02:45 0 5 5 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 2 2 03:30 3 10 13 03:45 2 3 5 04:00 1 9 10 04:15 4 2 6 04:30 1 4 5 04:45 0 2 2 05:00 1 3 4 05:15 1 0 1 05:30 0 6 6 05:45 1 3 4 06:00 0 2 2 06:15 2 3 5 06:30 1 1 2 06:45 0 1 1 07:00 0 1 1 07:15 0 0 0 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 2 2 4 08:00 0 0 0 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 1 0 1 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 Total 37 74 111 Percent 33.3% 66.7% Peak -15:30 15:15 ------15:30 Vol. - 10 24 - - - - - - 34 P.H.F. 0.500 0.600 0.654 Page 3 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 11-Apr-18 Total Time Wed Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 1 1 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 2 0 2 06:15 1 0 1 06:30 6 0 6 06:45 18 1 19 07:00 1 0 1 07:15 5 0 5 07:30 6 1 7 07:45 5 3 8 08:00 1 0 1 08:15 1 0 1 08:30 2 0 2 08:45 2 2 4 09:00 2 0 2 09:15 1 0 1 09:30 1 1 2 09:45 3 1 4 10:00 9 2 11 10:15 1 2 3 10:30 2 1 3 10:45 3 3 6 11:00 0 5 5 11:15 4 1 5 11:30 1 0 1 11:45 3 1 4 Total 80 25 105 Percent 76.2% 23.8% Peak -06:30 10:15 ------06:45 Vol. - 30 11 - - - - - - 32 P.H.F. 0.417 0.550 0.421 Page 4 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 11-Apr-18 Total Time Wed Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 5 0 5 12:15 0 4 4 12:30 1 1 2 12:45 1 3 4 01:00 5 3 8 01:15 4 4 8 01:30 5 2 7 01:45 1 2 3 02:00 0 1 1 02:15 2 2 4 02:30 2 6 8 02:45 2 0 2 03:00 2 3 5 03:15 4 9 13 03:30 3 8 11 03:45 1 6 7 04:00 0 5 5 04:15 0 3 3 04:30 1 7 8 04:45 0 3 3 05:00 0 1 1 05:15 0 5 5 05:30 1 2 3 05:45 0 1 1 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 06:45 2 3 5 07:00 0 0 0 07:15 0 1 1 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 4 3 7 08:00 0 1 1 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 0 1 1 10:00 0 1 1 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 Total 46 91 137 Percent 33.6% 66.4% Peak -12:45 15:15 ------15:00 Vol. - 15 28 - - - - - - 36 P.H.F. 0.750 0.778 0.692 Page 5 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 Start 12-Apr-18 Total Time Thu Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 2 2 4 01:15 1 1 2 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 1 1 2 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 1 0 1 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 1 1 2 06:30 5 0 5 06:45 18 1 19 07:00 4 0 4 07:15 3 0 3 07:30 2 1 3 07:45 4 1 5 08:00 5 2 7 08:15 2 0 2 08:30 7 1 8 08:45 2 0 2 09:00 2 0 2 09:15 2 3 5 09:30 3 0 3 09:45 2 0 2 10:00 1 1 2 10:15 4 2 6 10:30 3 4 7 10:45 3 2 5 11:00 4 7 11 11:15 *** 11:30 * ** 11:45 *** Total 82 30 112 Percent 73.2% 26.8% Peak -06:30 10:15 ------06:30 Vol. - 30 15 - - - - - - 31 P.H.F. 0.417 0.536 0.408 Grand Total 265 234 499 Percent 53.1% 46.9% ADT ADT 245 AADT 245 APPENDIX G TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS LTRPed.LTRPed.LTRPed.LTRPed.156NA0NA13000NA6040114NA0NA11000NA7033163NA0NA10000NA50341811NA0NA12000NA604760 24 NA 0 NA 46 0 0 0 NA 24 01540.83 0.55 NA NA NA 0.88 NA NA NA NA 0.86 NA0.82`PeakHourbasedoffofcollectedbiͲdirectionaltrafficcountdata.17:0017:15SUMMARYOFVEHICLEMOVEMENTSͲRegalAcresIILOCATION:MajesticCircle&GreenwayRoad4/10/2018COUNTY:CollierOBSERVER:R.PontideROADCONDITION:DryREMARKS:TotalVEHICLEMOVEMENTSTIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNDBEGIN16:3016:45PK.HOURTOTALP.H.F.NStreet:MajesticCirStreet:GreenwayRdTTRLLTR LTRPed.LTRPed.LTRPed.LTRPed.51NA0NA4000NA401440NA0NA3000NA301021NA0NA2000NA207101NA0NA0000NA7018213NA0NA9000NA160490.53 0.75 NA NA NA 0.56 NA NA NA NA 0.57 NA0.68`PeakHourbasedoffofcollectedbiͲdirectionaltrafficcountdata.P.H.F.BEGIN16:3016:4517:0017:15PK.HOURTOTALREMARKS:VEHICLEMOVEMENTSTIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNDSUMMARYOFVEHICLEMOVEMENTSͲRegalAcresIITotalLOCATION:KingdomCt&GreenwayRoad4/10/2018COUNTY:CollierOBSERVER:R.PontideROADCONDITION:DryNStreet:KingdomCtStreet:GreenwayRdTTRLLR1 LTRPed.LTRPed.LTRPed.LTRPed.NA10002NA0 2NA005NA00000NA0 2NA002NA01000NA0 3NA004NA10000NA0 0NA001NA21002NA0 7NA0012NA 0.50 0.25 NA NA 0.25 NA NA 0.58 NA NA NA0.60`PeakHourbasedoffofcollectedbiͲdirectionaltrafficcountdata.P.H.F.BEGIN16:3016:4517:0017:15PK.HOURTOTALREMARKS:VEHICLEMOVEMENTSTIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNDSUMMARYOFVEHICLEMOVEMENTSͲRegalAcresIITotalLOCATION:Synegenta&GreenwayRoad4/10/2018COUNTY:CollierOBSERVER:R.PontideROADCONDITION:DryRLRNSynegentaSeedsInc.Street:GreenwayRdTTL1 L:\20170000\20170078-000 - Habitat for Humanity (Regal Acres Ph 2)\Environmental\RAI Documents\Regal Acres Prcl B Env Assessment_RAI_01032018.docx REGAL ACRES PARCEL B COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT January 2018 Prepared For: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34113 (239) 775-0036 Prepared by: 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 341121 -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 1 Code Section 10.02.02 A-4 Subsection (a) – Applicant Information..................................................................... 1 Subsection (b) – Mapping and Support Graphics...................................................... 1 Subsection (c) – GMP Consistency Determinations.................................................. 3 Subsection (d) – Native Vegetation Preservation...................................................... 4 Subsection (e) – Wetlands ......................................................................................... 7 Subsection (f) – Listed Species.................................................................................. 8 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Habitat / FLUCFCS Types and Acreage.................................................... 2 Table 2: Native Vegetation Habitat Type and Acreage............................................ 6 Table 3: SFWMD / Collier County Wetlands and Surface Waters.......................... 7 Table 4: Potential Protected Plant Species................................................................ 9 Table 5: Potential Protected Wildlife........................................................................ 10 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Resume Attachment B. Environmental Drawings Attachment C. Protected Species Survey Attachment D. Florida Black Bear Management Plan Attachment E. Wading Bird Management Plan -1- INTRODUCTION Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc (HHCC) proposes to expand the existing Regal Acres residential development to include additional property located west of the existing development. The original development (Parcel A) includes approximately 36.75 acres of existing residential use including 184 dwellings. The addition to Regal Acres (Parcel B) includes an additional 23.15 acres located west of Majestic Circle, approximately 0.67 miles north of US 41. HHCC proposes to construct an additional 116 residential units in the Regal Acres Parcel B project. The project is located in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida with central coordinates of 26°02’55.9” North and 81°39’34.5” West. Please refer to Sheet 1 of Attachment B for a location map. Land uses surrounding the project area include existing residential to the west, south and east, and vacant residential (with infrastructure) to the north. 10.02.02 A-4 Subsection (a): Applicant Information i. Responsible person who wrote the EIS and his/her education and job related environmental experience. A. Gary Nychyk, Johnson Engineering, Inc. Ecologist. A copy of Mr. Nychyk’s resume is provided as Attachment A. ii. Owner(s)/agent(s) name, address, phone number, and e-mail. Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County 11145 Tamiami Trail E Naples, Florida 34113 (239) 775-0036 nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org Subsection (b): Mapping and Support Graphics Please Note: The majority of the mapping and supporting graphics are focused on the additional 23.15 acres of land being incorporated into the PUD (i.e. – Parcel B). Parcel A is completely developed and was not subject to updated mapping and field reviews. i. General Location Map A project location map is provided on Sheet 1 of Attachment B. -2- ii. Native Habitat Map A Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) map has been included for Parcel B at a scale of one-inch equals two hundred fifty feet (1" = 250') for the property and overlain on a 2016 digital aerial photograph. The Aerial Photograph and FLUCFCS Map are included on Sheet 3 of Attachment B. A Native Vegetation Map is also included on Sheet 6 of Attachment B, and Table 1 provides a synopsis of the habitat types found within the additional (Parcel B) project. Table 1: Habitat Descriptions FLUCFCS Description 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% 261E3 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 50-74% 321E1 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 10-24% 321E2 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 434E2 Hardwood-Conifer Mix, Exotics 25-49% 434E3 Hardwood-Conifer Mix, Exotics 50-74% 514 Swale 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 643E3 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50-74% iii. Topographic Map and Existing Drainage Patterns A Topographic Map showing Lidar data supplied by Collier County has been prepared to illustrate contour elevations and is included on Sheet 4 of Attachment B. iv. Soils Map According to the Collier County Soils Map, the following soil types are found on the property: Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum (soil map unit 2), Ft. drum and Malabar fine sands (soil map unit 20), Holopaw fine sand (soil map unit 27), and urban land (soil map unit 32). A Soils Map is included on Sheet 2 of Attachment B. v. Development Plan The Preliminary Site Plan is depicted on Sheet 5 Attachment B. vii. Site Plan The Preliminary Site Plan is depicted on Sheet 5 Attachment B. -3- Subsection (c): GMP Consistency Determination Conservation and Coastal Management Element consistency: Policy 6.1.1 The native preservation requirement for the proposed Regal Acres Parcel B is 25% of the existing native vegetation. As illustrated in the Native Vegetation Map in Attachment B, approximately 22.46 acres of Parcel B are classified as native vegetation. The swale (FLUCFCS 511) was excluded from native vegetation calculations. Therefore approximately 5.62 acres of native vegetation are required for the project. The proposed conceptual site plan provides 5.62 acres of onsite preservation in the western portion of the site as one large preserve. This portion of the property was selected for preservation to align with the offsite preserve of the adjacent development to the west. Policy 6.1.4: All invasive exotic vegetation will be removed from the project site during the development process. The site will be maintained free of invasive exotic species in accordance with permit conditions in perpetuity. Policy 6.1.7: Native vegetation will be incorporated into the landscape designs as required by the LDC. Native vegetation has been retained as depicted in the Native Vegetation Map and wet detention ponds will include a littoral shelf planted with native aquatic vegetation as required. Policy 6.1.8: Regal Acres Parcel B is located within the Urban Residential land use district. This document provides an objective evaluation of the impacts associated with the proposed development. The information within this evaluation will aide in planning and zoning decisions related to natural resources and environmental quality of the project. Policy 6.2.1 & 6.2.2 The jurisdictional wetland determination for Regal Acres Parcel B has not been verified by the SFWMD or USACE. The jurisdictional wetland limits will be reviewed by the agencies as part of the Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) and federal dredge and fill permit processes. Preliminary field determination indicates the subject property contains approximately 6.05 acres of wetlands and 0.69 acres of surface waters. As the limits have not been agency verified, the acreages are subject to change. The conceptual site plan proposes impacts to approximately 4.30 acres of wetlands and 0.69 acres of surface waters. The 4.30 acres of wetland impacts represent approximately 18.6% of Parcel B and 71.1 % of the wetlands on Parcel B. The remaining 1.77 acres of wetlands will be incorporated into the proposed 5.62-acre preserve. Policy 6.2.4 As shown in the environmental drawings (Attachment B), Regal Acres Parcel B is surrounded by existing residential development. Berms along the western and northern property lines sever hydrologic connections between adjacent developments and a swale along the eastern property line drains surface water to the canal along the southern property line. This alteration in natural hydrology appears to have reduced the hydroperiod of the wetlands onsite. The proposed -4- development will preserve 1.77 acres of wetlands onsite. The hydrology of the wetlands will be improved through the discharge of water into them from the stormwater management system, after the water has been fully treated to State water quality standards. Impacts to wetlands within Regal Acres Parcel B will be permitted and mitigated through the ERP and Federal Dredge and Fill permitting processes with SFWMD and USACE. Policy 6.2.6 Wetland preservation and mitigation areas will be protected by conservation easements as specified by permitting agencies and maintained as conservation areas. Policy 7.1.1 This policy requires incompatible land uses be directed away from listed species and their habitats. The development will coordinate with State and federal wildlife agencies to determine any appropriate mitigation for the loss of listed species habitat during the SFWMD and USACE review processes. Based upon current FWS methodology, the applicant will likely be required to provide mitigation for the entire 23.15-acre project site for potential impacts to Florida panther habitat. This mitigation is usually provided through the purchase of Panther Habitat Units (PHU) from a mitigation or conservation bank. No direct impacts to listed species are anticipated as a result of the development. Policy 7.1.2 A Protected Species Survey has been completed for the site and is attached as Attachment C. Management plans for the Florida black bear and wading birds have been included as Attachment D and Attachment E respectively. Policy 7.1.4 The Regal Acres Parcel B project will be reviewed by FWC and FWS during the ERP and federal dredge and fill permitting process. Subsection (d): Native Vegetation Preservation i. Identify the acreage and community type of all upland and wetland habitats found on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS). Provide a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identified onsite by vegetation type (species), vegetation composition (canopy, midstory, and groundcover) and vegetation dominance (dominant, common, occasional). Following is a description of the five (5) base FLUCFCS types identified within the additional 23.15-acre project area. The descriptions represent the overall vegetative/land use conditions and do not include the modifying levels of disturbance and/or exotic infestation. Levels of disturbance and exotic invasion are indicated by the following suffixes: E1 = Exotics 10-24% cover E2 = Exotics 25-49% cover -5- E3 = Exotics 50-74% cover Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-74% FLUCFCS Codes 261E2 and 261E3: (2.33 acres) The abandoned agriculture code is a remnant of row crops that once existed on the eastern side of the project area and continued onto property to the east. 2004 aerial photographs from Google Earth show the remnant agricultural rows and swales. Currently, this cover type is comprised of earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii) in the canopy. Midstory species include earleaf acacia and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolus). Ground cover is limited due to the dense coverage of exotic species, but includes muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) and other herbs and forbs that can withstand reduced sunlight. Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 10–49% FLUCFCS Codes 321E1 and 321E2: (2.88 acres) This upland habitat includes widely scattered slash pine, melaleuca and earleaf acacia in the canopy. Midstory species include saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), gallberry (Ilex glabra) and coastalplain staggerbush (Lyonia fruticosa). Groundcover species include wiregrass (Aristida stricta), pawpaw (Asimina reticulata), bogbuttons (Lachnocaulon anceps) and drumheads (Polygala sp.). Hardwood–Conifer Mix, Exotics 25–74% FLUCFCS Codes 434E2 and 434E3: (11.20 acres) This forested upland habitat type includes slash pine, live oak (Quercus virginiana), cabbage palm, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia in the canopy, with exotic vegetation covering up to 74%. Midstory vegetation includes saw palmetto, gallberry and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera). Ground cover is comprised primarily of wiregrass, muscadine, and swamp fern. Swale, FLUCFCS Code 514: (0.69 acres) This surface water runs from north to south near the eastern property line and empties into the canal located south of the project. Vegetation within the swale is sparse, but includes cabbage palm, earleaf acacia and melaleuca in the canopy. Brazilian pepper occupies the midstory. Groundcover is nearly absent. Wet Prairie, Exotics 25 – 74% FLUCFCS Codes 643E2 and 643E3: (6.05 acres) This disturbed wetland community has been isolated from historic hydrologic patterns through the construction of the swale to the east, residential development with perimeter berms to the north and west, and the canal to the south. The canopy is predominantly composed of melaleuca with scattered slash pine, live oak, cabbage palm and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum). Removal of the canopy exotics would result in less than 10% canopy closure, leading to the classification of wet prairie instead of a forested habitat code. Midstory and groundcover vegetation are sparse, but include Brazilian pepper, swamp fern, sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), and blue maidencane (Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum). Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in Goal 6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and Chapters 4 and 10 of the Land Development Code. -6- The native preservation requirement for the proposed development of Regal Acres Parcel B was determined to be 25% of 22.46 acres of Parcel B (the swale was excluded from native preservation calculations). Therefore, the native vegetation preserve requirement is 5.68 acres. The proposed conceptual site plan provides on contiguous 5.68-acre preserve, located along the western boundary of the development, as illustrated on the Preserve Map (Sheet 8, Attachment B).This location of native vegetation was selected for preserve by utilizing the selection criteria outlined in the LDC. Due to the level of exotic vegetation and altered hydrology, the onsite wetlands would have a UMAM functional assessment of value less than 0.65. The site represents infill development and therefore does not provide for wildlife corridors. Placing the preserve adjacent to an off-site preserve maximizes its potential use for wildlife to the maximum extent feasible. The Native Vegetation Map provided on (Sheet 7, Attachment B)illustrates those areas of the site currently considered to be native vegetation. Table 2 provides the acreage of these native habitats. Table 2: Native Vegetation Habitat Types and Acreage FLUCFCS Description Native Vegetation Acreage 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% 1.31 261E3 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 50-74% 1.02 321E1 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 10-24% 1.18 321E2 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 1.70 434E2 Hardwood-Conifer Mix, Exotics 25-49% 7.64 434E3 Hardwood-Conifer Mix, Exotics 50-74% 3.56 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 4.52 643E3 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50-74% 1.53 Total 22.46 LDC Section 4.06.04 All vegetation clearing activities will be in accordance with the approved SBR only after a Vegetation Removal Permit has been obtained through County Staff. LDC Section 10.02.14 All preserve areas will be shown on the landscape plan portion of the SBR. Have preserves or acreage requirements for preservation previously been identified for the site during previous development order approvals? This site has not been subjected to previous development approvals. For properties with Special Treatment overlays, show the ST overlay on the development plan and provide an explanation as to why these areas are being impacted or preserved. No ST overlays were identified on this property. -7- Subsection (e): Wetlands i. Define the number of acres of Collier County jurisdictional wetlands according to FLUCFCS. Include a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identified onsite by vegetation type, composition, and dominance. Wetland determinations are required to be verified by the SFWMD prior to submission to the County. The proposed Regal Acres Parcel B project preliminarily contains 6.05± acres of SFWMD/Collier County jurisdictional wetlands. This acreage was determined based upon field flagging preliminary wetland limits and GPS locating the limits to determine the associated acreage. As this application is solely to obtain zoning approval of the approved RPUD, the wetland limits have not been reviewed by SFWMD staff. At time of development review, the limits of wetlands will have been verified by SFWMD staff as part of the ERP process. The FLUCFCS Map on Sheet 3 of Attachment B illustrates the areas preliminarily determined to be jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters. The wetlands found on the site are comprised of two FLUCFCS types: Wet Prairie, Exotics 25-49% (FLUCFCS Code 643E2) and Wet Prairie, Exotics 50-74%% (FLUCFCS Code 643E3). Additionally, 0.69 acres of the project area are designated as Swale (FLUCFCS Code 514), which is a surface water. Typically, SFWMD does not require mitigation for impacts to surface waters, and are thus excluded from the calculated wetland acreage. Wetland acreages for the site and a description of each wetland FLUCFCS type can be found in Table 3. Table 3: SFWMD / Collier County Wetlands FLUCFCS Description Acreage 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 4.52 643E3 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50-74% 1.53 Total 6.05 Note: * The swale (FLUCFCS Code 514) is not considered wetland, but a Surface Water. SFWMD typically does not require mitigation for impacts to man-made Surface Waters Wet Prairie, Exotics 25 – 49%: FLUCFCS Code 643E2 (4.52 acres) This disturbed wetland community has been isolated from historic hydrologic patterns through the construction of the swale to the east, residential development with perimeter berms to the north and west, and the canal to the south. The canopy is predominantly composed of melaleuca with scattered slash pine, live oak, cabbage palm and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum). Removal of the canopy exotics would result in less than 10% canopy closure, leading to the classification of wet prairie instead of a forested habitat code. Midstory and groundcover vegetation are sparse, but include Brazilian pepper, swamp fern, sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), and blue maidencane (Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum). -8- Wet Prairie, Exotics 50 - 74%: FLUCFCS Code 643E3 (1.53 acres) This disturbed wetland community is similar to 643E2 described above, however exotic species such as earleaf acacia, melaleuca, and Brazilian pepper cover up to 74%. ii. Determine seasonal and historic high water levels utilizing lichen lines or other biological indicators. Indicate how the project design improves/affects predevelopment hydroperiods. Provide a narrative addressing the anticipated control elevations for the site. The control elevation for the proposed project will be determined during the ERP process. When the jurisdictional wetland limits are reviewed by SFWMD staff as part of an ERP application, they will also evaluate seasonal high water levels based upon above ground biological indicators. iii. Indicate the proposed percent of defined wetlands to be impacted and the effects of proposed impacts on the functions of these wetlands. Provide an exhibit showing the location of wetlands to be impacted and those to be preserved onsite. Describe how impacts to wetlands have been minimized. Preliminarily, the site contains approximately 6.05 acres of jurisdictional wetlands within two (2) separate wetland areas as illustrated on the Aerial and FLUCFCS Map on Sheet 3 of Attachment B. Due to configuration of the wetlands onsite, wetland impacts are unavoidable for development of a feasible site plan. A total of 4.30 acres (71.1%) of the jurisdictional wetlands is proposed for impact as part of the conceptual site plan. The Wetland Impact Map on Sheet 9 of Attachment B depicts proposed impacts to wetlands. The remaining 1.76 acres of onsite wetlands will be incorporated into the 5.68-acre onsite preserve along with approximately 3.86 acres of surrounding uplands. The preserved wetlands/wetland impacts are illustrated on the Preserve Map and Wetland Impact Map on Sheets 8 and of Attachment B. The preserved wetlands and uplands will be enhanced through exotic removal and maintained in perpetuity through a conservation easement. This preserve configuration provides one large preserve at the edge of development, which is more valuable to wildlife than a preserve surrounded by the development. iv. Indicate how the project design compensates for wetland impacts pursuant to the Policies and Objectives in goal 6 in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed wetland impacts must be reviewed and approved by the SFWMD and USACE prior to SBR approval. These agencies will evaluate the need for and assess appropriate compensatory mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts at that time. Subsection (f): Listed Species i. Provide a plant and animal species survey to include at a minimum, listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing onsite, and conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission -9- and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State actual survey times and dates, and provide a map showing the location of species of special status identified onsite. The Regal Acres Parcel B Protected Species Survey (Attachment C) provides detailed information regarding potential and observed protected species. ii. Identify all listed species that are known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on the site or that have been directly observed onsite. Listed plantspecies that have the potential to occur and/or have been observed on the project site are listed in Table 4. Listed wildlife species that have the potential to occur and/or have been observed on the property are listed in Table 5. Please refer to the PSS report in Attachment C for details regarding potential utilization of the site by listed species. Table 4. Potential Protected Plant Species Scientific Name Common Name Designated Status Potential to Occur or Observed FDA Cyrtopodium punctatum Cowhorn Orchid E Potential Encyclia tampensis Butterfly Orchid C Potential Tillandsia fasciculate Stiff Leaved Wild Pine E Potential Tillandsia utriculata Giant Wild Pine, Giant Air Plant E Potential Tillandsia pruinosa Fuzzy-wuzzy Air Plant E Potential Tillandsia flexuosa Twisted Air Plant T Potential Legend FDA – Florida Department of Agriculture E – Endangered C – Commercially Exploited -10- Table 5: Potential Protected Wildlife. Upland Prairie FLUCFCS Potential Protected Species (Common Name) Potential Protected Species (Scientific name) 261E2 261 E3 321E1 321E2 Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais couperi Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus Florida Sandhill Crane Antigone canadensis pratensis Florida Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia floridana Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi Upland Forest FLUCFCS Potential Protected Species (Common Name) Potential Protected Species (Scientific Name) 434E2 434E3 Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais couperi Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi Wetlands and Surface Waters FLUCFCS Potential Protected Species (Common Name) Potential Protected Species (Scientific Name) 514 643E2 643E3 American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis American Crocodile Crocodylus acutus Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais couperi Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea Reddish Egret Egretta rufescens Roseate Spoonbill Platalea ajaja Tricolored Heron Egretta tricolor Wood Stork Mycteria americana Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi *Please note:The list of potential protected wildlife is based strictly on the habitat types present on the site and does not take into account the small size of the habitat that may lessen its value for far-ranging species. ATTACHMENT A RESUME A. G ARY NYCHYK ECOLOGIST agn@johnsonseng.com 239.461.2464 YEARS EXPERIENCE 12 years EDUCATION /CERTIFICATIONS B.S.MARINE BIOLOGY,1998 UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA AUTHORIZED GOPHER TORTOISE AGENT,FFWCC (GTA-15-00036A) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ESTERO BAY AGENCY ON BAY MANAGEMENT Gary Nychyk joined Johnson Engineering, Inc. in January 2004 as an Ecologist. His duties include vegetation mapping, wildlife surveys, track surveys, protected species management plans, wetland jurisdictional delineations, wetland mitigation monitoring, prescribed burning, and exotic vegetation control. Mr. Nychyk works closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Lee County Port Authority, as well as local city and county government agencies. Project Experience x Florida Bonneted Bat acoustic and cavity tree surveys for several southwest Florida clients. x NPDES annual compliance inspection and training for Southwest Florida International Airport and Page Field. x Gopher Tortoise permitting, surveys and relocation for several area developers. x Babcock Community vegetation, wildlife, bird call, and frog species monitoring programs. x Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Faith Landing preserve area monitoring. x Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Kaicasa wildlife surveys and permitting. Prior to employment with Johnson Engineering, Mr. Nychyk was a Senior Environmental Planner with the Lee County Department of Community Development, Division of Environmental Sciences. Mr. Nychyk coordinated Vegetation Removal Permitting, and Agricultural Notices of Clearing. He also reviewed local development orders for compliance with the Lee County Land Development Code, and planned development rezoning cases before the Lee County Board of County Commissioners, and the Bonita Springs City Counsel. Mr. Nychyk also reviewed protected species surveys and management plans and performed helicopter and vehicle based monitoring surveys for southern bald eagle nest locations throughout Lee County. Mr. Nychyk was also employed as an Environmental Specialist for Wetland Sciences Inc. (WSI) in Gulf Breeze, Florida. Duties with WSI included erosion control projects on Eglin Airforce Base, wetland restoration and mitigation, as well as identification of aquatic invertebrates for indications of water quality on a chemical spill site. ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL DRAWINGS JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2122 JOHNSON STREET P.O. BOX 1550 FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550 PHONE (239) 334-0046 FAX (239) 334-3661 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 TA MIA MITRL E GREENWAYRDROOSTRDJOSEPHLNCREATIVEDRMANATEE RD SONOMABLVDBASSLNMANCHESTER DR CHEETAHDRMUSEOCIRPA R A DIS E D R CECIL RD CA M PAN ILE CIR TROPICALLN KINGDOM CT Location Map Regal Acres Parcel B Collier County, Florida January 2018 20170078-000 12-51-26 Not to Scale 1 q DATE PROJECT FILE NO.SCALE SHEET O:\2017\20170078\Environmental\ArcGIS\Fig 1 Location Map.mxd! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! MIAMI TAMPA OCALA NAPLES BARTOW ORLANDO CHIPLEY KEY WEST SARASOTA LAKE CITY PENSACOLA FORT MYERS FORT PIERCE GAINESVILLE PANAMA CITY TALLAHASSEE DAYTONA BEACH ST. AUGUSTINE FORT LAUDERDALE WEST PALM BEACH SONOMABLVDLIME KEY LN GRAPEVINEDR GRASSY KEY LN OCEAN REEF LN SUGAR LOAF LN KINGDOM CT MAJESTIC CIR FERN LAKE CT MANCHESTERDRMANCHESTER DR Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East Latitude:26° 02' 55.9" N, Longitude: 81° 39' 34.5" W NOTES: The aerial photos shown were taken in 2016. STATE OF FLORIDA STREET MAP N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY AERIAL N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION §¨¦75 ¬«82 £¤41 §¨¦75 ¬«29 ")846 £¤41 ")951 COLLIER COUNTY N.T.S. Project Vicinity (see Street Map and Vicinity Aerial below) Aerial and Soils MapREGAL ACRES - PARCEL BHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYLEGENDSoils LegendSymbolSoil NameHydricStatusPARCEL BPARCEL A 434E2(5.92 AC±)261E3(1.02 AC±)434E3(2.30AC±)643E2(1.59 AC±)434E2(1.72 AC±)321E2(1.70 AC±)643E2(2.93 AC±)643E3(1.19 AC±)434E3(1.26 AC±)321E1(1.18 AC±)261E2(1.31 AC±)643E3(0.34 AC±)514(0.69 AC±)Aerial and FLUCFCS MapREGAL ACRES - PARCEL BHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYLegendProject BoundaryFLUCFCSSFWMD Wetlands (6.05 AC)SFWMD Surface Water (0.69 AC)REGAL ACRES PARCEL BREGAL ACRES PARCEL APARCEL BPARCEL A Topographic MapREGAL ACRES - PARCEL BHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYElevation TableColor Elev.3.04.05.06.07.0PARCEL BPARCEL A WMWMFMPreliminary Site PlanREGAL ACRES - PARCEL BHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYMHPUDPUDARESIDENTIALMOBILE HOMEPARKRESIDENTIALSINGLE FAMILYVACANTPRESERVELEGENDPUDLUCAAAVACANTARESIDENTIALSINGLE FAMILYAPARCEL BPARCEL ALAND SUMMARY USECATEGORY ACREAGETOTAL SITE AREAMAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS300 D.U. (5 D.U. / AC)184 D.U. (5 D.U. / AC)116 D.U. (5 D.U. / AC)REQUIRED / PROVIDED PRESERVENATIVE VEGETATION CALCULATIONS 5140.69 AC±643E21.59 AC±434E21.72 AC±321E21.70 AC±643E22.93 AC±643E31.19 AC±434E31.26 AC±321E11.18 AC±434E32.30 AC±434E25.92 AC±643E30.34 AC±261E31.02 AC±261E21.31 AC±Native Vegetation MapREGAL ACRES - PARCEL BHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYLEGEND434E31.26 AC±60% Required23.15 AC x .60 = 13.89 AC18.26 AC Provided(1.0 AC Lake, 5.6 AC Preserve, + 11.66 AC Other)25% Required22.46 AC x 0.25 = 5.62 AC ProvidedOpenSpaceNativeVegetationTotal Area 23.15 ACSITE REQUIREMENTS - PARCEL B* Please Note: There was no native vegetation requirement associated with PARCEL BPARCEL B - NATIVE VEGETATION TABLEPARCEL BPARCEL A 434E20.06 AC±643E2(0.51 AC±)434E2(1.33 AC±)643E30.92 AC±434E30.68 AC±434E3(0.75 AC±)434E2(0.85 AC±)643E3(0.33 AC±)434E3(0.19 AC±)0Preserve MapREGAL ACRES - PARCEL BHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYMHPUDPUDARESIDENTIALMOBILE HOMEPARKRESIDENTIALSINGLE FAMILYVACANTPRESERVEAAAVACANTARESIDENTIALSINGLE FAMILYA* Please Note: There was no native vegetation requirement associated with PARCEL APARCEL B - NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVE TABLELEGEND434E31.26 AC±PARCEL BPARCEL ALAND SUMMARY USECATEGORY ACREAGETOTAL SITE AREAMAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS300 D.U. (5 D.U. / AC)184 D.U. (5 D.U. / AC)116 D.U. (5 D.U. / AC)REQUIRED / PROVIDED PRESERVE 643E2(1.10 AC±)643E2(2.93 AC±)514(0.69 AC±)643E3(0.27 AC±)Wetland Impact MapREGAL ACRES - PARCEL BHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYWETLAND / SW IMPACT TABLELEGEND434E31.26 AC±PARCEL BPARCEL A ATTACHMENT C PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY L:\20170000\20170078-000 - Habitat for Humanity (Regal Acres Ph 2)\Environmental\RAI Documents\Protected Species Survey_08312017-a.docx REGAL ACRES PARCEL B Protected Species Survey June 2017 Prepared for: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. Prepared by: 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 34112 -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS............................................................................ 3 3.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY ....................................................................... 8 4.0 RESULTS/DISCUSSION.............................................................................. 11 5.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................. 20 FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location Map......................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Soils Map........................................................................................... 4 Figure 3 FLUCFCS Map.................................................................................. 5 Figure 4 Potential Protected Species Map........................................................ 10 Figure 5 Protected Species Map....................................................................... 12 Figure 6 Panther Habitat Map ......................................................................... 16 TABLES Table 2-1 Vegetation Associations and Acreages.............................................. 3 Table 3-1 Dates, Times, Weather Conditions and Purpose of Field Surveys............................................................................................... 8 Table 3-2 Potential Protected Species................................................................ 9 Table 4-1 Protected Species Summary Sheet..................................................... 13 Table 4-2 Non-listed Wildlife Observed on the Property.................................. 14 Table 4-3 Panther Habitat Unit Analysis ........................................................... 17 HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -1- 1.0 INTRODUCTION Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc (HHCC) proposes to expand the existing Regal Acres residential development to include additional property located west of the existing development. The original development (Parcel A) includes approximately 36.75 acres of existing residential use including 184 dwellings. The addition to Regal Acres (Parcel B) project area includes approximately 23.15 acres and is located west of Majestic Circle, approximately 0.67 miles north of US 41. HHCC proposes to construct an additional 116 residential units. The project is located in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida with central coordinates of 26°02’55.9” North and 81°39’34.5” West. Please refer to Figure 1 for a location map. Land uses surrounding the project area include existing residential to the west, south and east, and vacant residential (with infrastructure) to the north. Two Johnson Engineering, Inc. ecologists conducted a protected species survey (PSS) on the subject property on March 29, 2017. The PSS was updated on June 19, 2017 to include additional acreage. Pedestrian transects were established to cover approximately 60% of each suitable habitat within the project area. The purpose of the survey was to identify and document the presence of any plant or wildlife species listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) as endangered, threatened, species of special concern, or commercially exploited. This report represents the results of the PSS prepared in accordance with Collier County and FWC approved methods for conducting protected species surveys and for gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrow surveys, as provided in the Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines [FWC, 2017]. JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2122 JOHNSON STREET P.O. BOX 1550 FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550 PHONE (239) 334-0046 FAX (239) 334-3661 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 T A MIA MI T R L E GREENWAY RDROOST RDJOSEPH LNCREATIVE DRMANATEE RD SONOMA BLVDBASS LNMANCHESTER DR CHEETAH DRMUSEO CIRP A R A DIS E D R CECIL RD CA M PANI L E CIR TROPICAL LN KINGDOM CT Location Map Regal Acres 3DUFHO% Collier County, Florida April 2017 20170078-000 12-51-26 Not to Scale Figure 1 P DATE PROJECT FILE NO.SCALE SHEET \\NAPS01\Drawings\2017\20170078\Environmental\ArcGIS\Fig 1 Location Map.mxd MIAMI TAMPA OCALA NAPLES BARTOW ORLANDO CHIPLEY KEY WEST SARASOTA LAKE CITY PENSACOLA FORT MYERS FORT PIERCE GAINESVILLE PANAMA CITY TALLAHASSEE DAYTONA BEACH ST. AUGUSTINE FORT LAUDERDALE WEST PALM BEACH SONOMA BLVDLIME KEY LN GRAPEVINE DR GRASSY KEY LN OCEAN REEF LN SUGAR LOAF LN KINGDOM CT MAJESTIC CIR FERN LAKE CT MANCHESTER DRMANCHEST ER DR Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East Latitude:26° 02' 55.9" N, Longitude: 81° 39' 34.5" W NOTES: The aerial photos shown were taken in 2016. STATE OF FLORIDA STREET MAP N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY AERIAL N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION ]^75 `_82 Z[41 ]^75 `_29 846 Z[41 951 COLLIER COUNTY N.T.S. 3URMHFW9LFLQLW\ (see Street Map and Vicinity Aerial below) HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -3- 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Through mapping and classifying the various vegetative habitats occurring onsite, qualified determinations can be made with regard to the presence of protected species. The cover and vegetation association types within the 23.15-acre addition were delineated using Collier County 2016 digital aerial photographs, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey Maps for Collier County (Figure 2), and field observations. The habitat types were classified according to Levels III and IV of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) [Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), 1999]. The resulting FLUCFCS and Protected Species Survey Map is provided in Figure 3. The approximate acreages for the various FLUCFCS Codes within the additional lands can be found in Table 2-1.A brief description of each surveyed FLUCFCS Code follows. Table 2-1: Vegetation Associations and Acreages FLUCFCS Description Acreage Federal Status State Status 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% 1.31 U U 261E3 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 50-74% 1.02 U U 321E1 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 1-24% 1.18 U U 321E2 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 1.70 U U 434E2 Hardwood-Conifer Mix, Exotics 25-49% 7.64 U U 434E3 Hardwood-Conifer Mix, Exotics 50-74% 3.56 U U 514 Swale 0.69 SW SW 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 4.52 W W 643E3 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50-74% 1.53 W W Total 23.15 Legend U = Upland SW = Surface Water W = Wetland Aerial and Soils MapREGAL ACRES P$5&(/%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYLEGENDSoils LegendSymbolSoil NameHydricStatus)LJXUH 434E2(5.92 AC±)261E3(1.02 AC±)434E3(2.30AC±)643E2(1.59 AC±)434E2(1.72 AC±)321E2(1.70 AC±)643E2(2.93 AC±)643E3(1.19 AC±)434E3(1.26 AC±)321E1(1.18 AC±)261E2(1.31 AC±)643E3(0.34 AC±)514(0.69 AC±)Aerial and FLUCFCS MapREGAL ACRES P$5&(/%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFCOLLIER COUNTYLegendProject BoundaryFLUCFCSSFWMD Wetlands (6.05 AC)SFWMD Surface Water (0.69 AC)REGAL ACRES PHASE TWOREGAL ACRES PHASE ONE)LJXUH HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -6- FLUCFCS Code 261E2: Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% (1.31 acres) The abandoned agriculture cover code is a remnant of row crops that once existed on the eastern side of the project area and continued onto property to the east. 2004 aerial photographs from Google Earth show the remnant agricultural rows and swales. Currently, this cover type is comprised of earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii) in the canopy. Midstory species include earleaf acacia and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolus). Ground cover is limited due to the dense coverage of exotic species, but includes muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) and other herbs and forbs that can withstand reduced sunlight. FLUCFCS Code 261E3: Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 50-74% (1.02 acres) This cover code is similar that that described above, except that the coverage of exotic species increases to between 50 and 74%. Earleaf acacia and melaleuca dominate the canopy with scattered cabbage palm and slash pine. Midstory species include earleaf acacia and Brazilian pepper. Ground cover is nearly absent, but includes muscadine, swamp fern, and other herbs and forbs that can withstand reduced sunlight. FLUCFCS Code 321E1: Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 10 – 24% (1.18 acres) This upland habitat includes widely scattered slash pine, melaleuca and earleaf acacia in the canopy. Midstory species include saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), gallberry (Ilex glabra) and coastalplain staggerbush (Lyonia fruticosa). Groundcover species include wiregrass (Aristida stricta), pawpaw (Asimina reticulata), bogbuttons (Lachnocaulon anceps) and drumheads (Polygala sp.). FLUCFCS Code 321E2: Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25 - 49% (1.70 acres) This upland habitat includes widely scattered slash pine with up to 49% coverage of exotic species such as melaleuca and earleaf acacia in the canopy. Midstory species include saw palmetto, gallberry and coastalplain staggerbush. Groundcover species include wiregrass, pawpaw, bogbuttons and drumheads. HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -7- FLUCFCS Code 434E2: Hardwood – Conifer Mix, Exotics 25 – 49% (7.64 acres) This forested upland habitat type includes slash pine, live oak (Quercus virginiana), cabbage palm, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia in the canopy, with exotic vegetation covering up to 49%. Midstory vegetation includes saw palmetto, gallberry and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera). Ground cover is comprised of wiregrass, muscadine and swamp fern. FLUCFCS Code 434E3: Hardwood – Conifer Mix, Exotics 50 – 74% (3.56 acres) This forested upland habitat type is similar to FLUCFCS Code 434E2 described above, however coverage of exotic species such as melaleuca and earleaf acacia is up to 74%. FLUCFCS Code 514: Swale, (0.69 acres) This surface water runs from north to south near the eastern property line and empties into the canal located south of the project. Vegetation within the swale is sparse, but includes cabbage palm, earleaf acacia and melaleuca in the canopy. Brazilian pepper occupies the midstory. Groundcover is nearly absent. FLUCFCS Code 643E2: Wet Prairie, Exotics 25 – 49% (4.52 acres) This disturbed wetland community has been isolated from historic hydrologic patterns through the construction of the swale to the east, residential development with perimeter berms to the north and west, and the canal to the south. The canopy is predominantly composed of melaleuca with scattered slash pine, live oak, cabbage palm and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum). Removal of the canopy exotics would result in less than 10% canopy closure, lending to the classification of wet prairie instead of a forested habitat code. Midstory and groundcover vegetation are sparse, but include Brazilian pepper, swamp fern, sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), and blue maidencane (Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum). FLUCFCS Code 643E3: Wet Prairie, Exotics 50 - 74% (1.53 acres) This disturbed wetland community is similar to 643E2 described above, however exotic species such as earleaf acacia, melaleuca, and Brazilian pepper cover up to 74%. HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -8- 3.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY The PSS included field surveys and a literature review. Field surveys were conducted utilizing pedestrian belt transects. Transects were performed in all vegetation associations (FLUCFCS) and the distances between transects were established to cover a minimum of 60% of each habitat type within the project area. The PSS was conducted in accordance with standard FWC survey guidelines as well as methods outlined in the Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines [FWC, 2017].Table 3-1 lists the times and weather conditions during the field survey. Table 3-1 Dates, Times, Weather Conditions and Purpose of Field Surveys. Date Time Weather Conditions Purpose Staff 3/29/2017 9:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Mostly sunny, Temperature mid 70s F, Winds from ENE at 5 - 10 mph. PSS AGN JOC 6/19/2017 12:00 p.m. – 3:00 P.m. Cloudy, Temperature in the mid 80s F, Winds from SE at 10 mph.PSS AGN AGN – A. Gary Nychyk JOC – John Curtis Literature review sources included Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern [FWC, 2017], Florida Natural Areas Inventory [FNAI], U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS), as well as the Collier County Land Development Code. Based on the literature review, a compilation of federal and state protected species was developed. Table 3-2 lists potential listed species commonly associated with the vegetative communities observed onsite.Figure 4 provides an analysis of potential protected species for the project area, based on documented occurrences of listed species and consultation zones available from the previously mentioned agencies. HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -9- Table 3-2 Potential Protected Species. Upland Prairie FLUCFCS Potential Protected Species (Common Name) Potential Protected Species (Scientific name)Status 261E2 261 E3 321E1 321E2 Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus ST Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais couperi FT Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus ST Florida Sandhill Crane Antigone canadensis pratensis ST Florida Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia floridana ST Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus ST Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi FE Upland Forest 434E2 434E3 Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais couperi FT Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus ST Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis FE Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus FE Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi FE Cowhorn Orchid Cyrtopodium punctatum SE Butterfly Orchid Encyclia tampensis SC Stiff Leaved Wild Pine Tillandsia fasciculate SE Giant Wild Pine, Giant Air Plant Tillandsia utriculata SE Fuzzy-wuzzy Air Plant Tillandsia pruinosa SE Twisted Air Plant Tillandsia flexuosa ST Wetlands and Surface Waters 514 643E2 643E3 American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis FT (S/A) American Crocodile Crocodylus acutus FT Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais couperi FT Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus ST Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea ST Reddish Egret Egretta rufescens ST Roseate Spoonbill Platalea ajaja ST Tricolored Heron Egretta tricolor ST Wood Stork Mycteria americana FT Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus FE Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi FE Legend: S – State of Florida F – Federal T – Threatened E – Endangered C – Commercially Exploited S/A – Similarity in Appearance 989898989898989898989898989898('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('('(' ('('0,/(%8))(5INTERIOR OF COMBINEDWOODSTORK COREFORAGING AREABONNETED BATFOCAL AREABONNETED BATCONSULTATION AREABCBCGulf ofMexico5(*$/$&5(63$5&(/6$ %TAMI A MI TR A ILCR92NCOLLIERBLVDCOLLIERBLVDRATTLESNAKEHAMMOCKCAPRIBLVDLELYRESORTBLVD.BAYSHOREDRCOUNTYBARNRDTHOMASSONDRFERNSTREETPALMSTAugust 201720170078-000 -- As Shown)LJXUHDocumented Occurrences of Listed SpeciesHabitat for HumanityCollier County, FloridaPath: \\naps01\drawings\2017\20170078\Environmental\ArcGIS\listed species 11x17.mxd Date: 8/11/2017 Time: 2:33:24 PM User: pmlDATEPROJECT NO. FILE NO.SCALESHEETJOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2350 STANFORD COURTNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112PHONE (239) 434-0333FAX (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642NOTES1. The aerial photographs shown wereprovided by Collier County governmentand were taken in 2012.2. The core foraging areas for Woodstorkcolonies 619310, Corkscrew and NorthCatherine Island II cross into the five-milebuffer. Individual core foraging areaboundaries are not shown for clarity.Species / layers checked include thoseshown and:-Caracara roosts(Dwyer, 2013)-Caracara gathering areas(USFWS, 2007)-Caracara nests(Morrison, 2014)-Caracara nests & observations(USFWS, 2010)-Caracara consultation area(USFWS, 3/2007)-Scrub jay locations(USFWS, 2011)LEGENDBonneted bat focal area(USFWS, 2013)Bonneted bat consultation area(USFWS, 2013)Combined Woodstorkcore foraging areas(see Note 2)(USFWS, 2010)98Eagle nests(FFWCC, 2015) Wading bird colonyobservations(USFWS, 2007)('Scrub jay locations(FFWCC, 1993) RCW general locations(FFWCC, 2005)RCW consultation area(USFWS, 2003)Black bear locations / nuisancereports(FFWCC, 2007 / 2014)('Bear road kills(FFWCC, 2015)Panther primary zone(USFWS, 2007)Panther secondary zone(USFWS, 2007)Panther telemetry(USFWS, 2016)('Panther road kills(FFWCC, 2017)P01.250.625SCALE IN MILESR(*$/$&5(63$5&(/% HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -11- 4.0 RESULTS/DISCUSSION Table 4-1 summarizes the findings of the PSS performed for the Regal Acres Parcel B project. The Protected Species Survey Map is provided as Figure 5 and includes a depiction of pedestrian transects. Several non-listed species were also observed during the PSS and are outlined in Table 4-2. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Gopher tortoises are listed as Threatened by the State and as a candidate species for possible federal listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by FWS. Gopher tortoises are most often found on well-drained sandy soils in upland habitats with low-growing herbs. No signs of gopher tortoises or their burrows were observed during the survey. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) The eastern indigo snake is listed as Threatened by both FWS and FWC. Eastern indigo snakes utilize a variety of habitat types to complete their life cycles including: pine flatwoods, scrub areas, hydric pine flatwoods, wet and dry prairies, agricultural fields, coastal hardwood hammocks, mangrove areas and even human altered areas can be considered habitat for the species (FWS 1999). In south Florida, the species is not as dependent on gopher tortoise burrows for over-wintering. However, they will use gopher tortoise burrows as underground refugia. In addition, the species will use armadillo burrows, natural ground holes, hollows at the base of trees, ground litter, and debris piles. Steiner et al. (1983) suggest that eastern indigo snakes in south Florida prefer hammock type environments and pine forests. No eastern indigo snakes were observed during the PSS. However, based on the habitat types referenced in the FWS’ “South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan”, vegetation communities within the project area could provide potential habitat for this species. Compliance with the USFWS eastern indigo snake protection measures during construction will ensure this species is not adversely affected by the project. JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2122 JOHNSON STREET P.O. BOX 1550 FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550 PHONE (239) 334-0046 FAX (239) 334-3661 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 (' OCEAN REEF LNMANCHESTER DRMAJESTIC CIRJOSEPH LNProtected Species Map Regal Acres 3DUFHO% July 2017 20170078-000 12-51-26 As Shown Figure P 0200100 Feet DATE PROJECT FILE NO.SCALE SHEET \\NAPS01\Drawings\2017\20170078\Environmental\ArcGIS\Fig 4 Protected Species.mxdNOTES: The aerial photos shown from Collier County Digital Library and dated: January 2016. Legend Project Boundary 50' Transect lines('Snag Nest HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -13- Table 4-1 Protected Species Survey Results. Upland Prairie FLUCFCS Potential Protected Species (Common Name) Present Absent Density 261E2 261E3 321E1 321E2 Gopher Tortoise X Eastern Indigo Snake X Florida Pine Snake X Florida Sandhill Crane X Florida Burrowing Owl X Southeastern American Kestrel X Florida Panther X Upland Forest 434E2 434E3 Eastern Indigo Snake X Florida Pine Snake X Red-Cockaded Woodpecker X Big Cypress Fox Squirrel X Florida Bonneted Bat X Florida Panther X Cowhorn Orchid X Butterfly Orchid X Stiff Leaved Wild Pine X Giant Wild Pine, Giant Air Plant X Fuzzy-wuzzy Air Plant X Twisted Air Plant X Wetlands and Surface Waters 514 643E2 643E3 American Alligator X American Crocodile X Eastern Indigo Snake X Florida Pine Snake X Little Blue Heron X Reddish Egret X Roseate Spoonbill X Tricolored Heron X Wood Stork X Big Cypress Fox Squirrel X Florida Bonneted Bat X Florida Panther X HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -14- Table 4-2. Non-listed Wildlife Observed on the Property Scientific Name Common NameBirds Quiscalus quiscula Common grackle Mimus polyglottos Northern mockingbird Hylatomus pileatus Pileated woodpecker Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow Zenaida macroura Mourning dove Melanerpes carolinus Redbellied woodpecker Mammals Lontra canadensis River otter Dasypus novemcinctus Nine-banded armadillo Procyon lotor Raccoon Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) The Big Cypress fox squirrel is listed by FWC as Threatened; it is not listed by FWS. Preferred Big Cypress fox squirrel habitat consists of pine flatwoods, mixed hardwood-pine forest, and cypress swamp, with low ground cover. Big Cypress fox squirrels are known to use several habitat types for foraging, including golf courses, pastures with scattered trees and rural residential areas with wooded lots (Florida Committee on Rare and Endangered Plants and Animals – FCREPA 1992). Big Cypress fox squirrels build platform nests in slash pines and hardwoods (i.e. oak) and moss and stick nests in cypress and tops of cabbage palms. During the PSS, ecologists searched for Big Cypress fox squirrels, their nests, or other signs. Two stick nests were observed in melaleuca trees during the PSS. During environmental resource permitting, regulatory agencies may request monitoring of the nests to confirm whether they are Big Cypress fox squirrel nests or the non-listed eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). If the nests are of fox squirrel origin and actively used by fox squirrel young, FWC typically requires that a buffer having a radius of approximately 125 feet be cordoned off around the tree using enviro-fence with no construction in this buffer area being performed until the fox squirrel young leaves the nest. If needed, prior to conducting any nest removal, FWC Division of Wildlife will be contacted for guidance and to obtain the appropriate approvals and permits. HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -15- Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi) The northwestern corner of the Regal Acres Parcel B project (approximately 2.22 acres) is located in the Panther Primary Zone as set forth by FWC, while the remaining 20.93 acres is within the Panther Secondary Zone (Figure 6). A preliminary analysis of impacts to panther habitat has been performed resulting in the Panther Habitat Unit (PHU) Analysis (Table 4-3). This table is preliminary in nature and must be reviewed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The USACE permitting process will serve as the federal nexus for review of potential habitat impacts by the USFWS under Section 7 Consultation of the Endangered Species Act. Any required mitigation for the loss of habitat will be provided at a federally approved mitigation and/or conservation bank located in primary panther habitat. Florida Black Bear (Ursa americanus floridanus) The Florida black bear is one of three (3) subspecies of American black bear recognized in the southeastern United States. It is no longer listed by the FWC. This species can be found in a variety of habitats, including mixed hardwood pine, cabbage palm hammock, upland oak scrub, and forested wetlands, such as cypress and riverine swamps. Acorns, nuts, berries and other native vegetation comprise the primary diet of this species. One objective of the Black Bear Management Plan (FWC, 2012) is to reduce human-bear conflicts. “Eliminating food sources that attract bears is the first and most important action to resolve problems.” (FWC 2012) To help reduce human-bear conflicts, Homeowners and residents will be instructed to: store trash in a secure area until morning of pickup; bring pet food inside and store securely; protect gardens, compost and livestock with fencing or other appropriate measures; clean grills and store them in a secure area; and remove wildlife feeders when a bear is in the area. A black bear management plan is included as Attachment D of the Collier County EIS. P A N T H E R P R IM A R Y Z O N E P A N T H E R S E C O N D A R Y Z O N E 352-(&7%281'$5< 434E2 643E2 434E2 321E2 643E2 261E2 434E3 434E3 643E3 321E1 261E3 434E3 434E2 643E3 514 643E3 643E2 OCEAN REEF LNMANCHESTERDR MAJESTICCIRJOSEPHLNPanther Impact Map Regal Acres 3DUFHO% August 2017 20170078-000 --As Shown )LJXUH P 0200100 SCALE IN FEET DATE PROJECT FILE NO.SCALE SHEET \\naps01\drawings\2017\20170078\Environmental\ArcGIS\FLUCFCS panther zones.mxdLEGEND Project Boundary FLUCFCS Polygon & Code Wetland Surface Water NOTES 1. The Panther primary and secondary zones shown were provided by USFWS. 2. The FLUCFCS. wetland and Surface Water polygons shown have not been GPS located, have not been agency verified and are subject to change. 3. Nomenclature and delineations as per the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) (FDOT, 1999). 4. Abbreviations N = Non-wetland W = Wetland SW = Surface Water 5. The aerial photograph shown was provided by Collier County government and was taken in 2016. 434E2 JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE (239) 434-0333 FAX (239) 334-3661 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 FLUCFCS Code Description Status Area in acres 434E2 Hardwood - conifer mixed, exotics 25-49% N 0.81 434E3 Hardwood - conifer mixed, exotics 50-74% N 1.29 643E2 Wet prairie, exotics 25-49% W < 0.01 643E3 Wet prairie, exotics 50-74% W 0.12 2.22 FLUCFCS Code Description Status Area in acres 261E2 Abandoned agriculture, exotics 25-49% N 1.31 261E3 Abandoned agriculture, exotics 50-74% N 1.02 321E1 Palmetto prairie, exotics 1-24% N 1.18 321E2 Palmetto prairie, exotics 25-49% N 1.70 434E2 Hardwood - conifer mixed, exotics 25-49% N 6.83 434E3 Hardwood - conifer mixed, exotics 50-74% N 2.27 514 Swale SW 0.69 643E2 Wet prairie, exotics 25-49% W 4.52 643E3 Wet prairie, exotics 50-74% W 1.41 20.93 23.15 FLUCFCS TABLE PANTHER PRIMARY ZONE PANTHER SECONDARY ZONE Panther Primary Zone Total Primary & Secondary Zone Total Panther Secondary Zone Total HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -17- Table 4-3: Panther Habitat Unit Analysis FLUCFCS Code Description Component Acres in Panther Primary Zone Component Acres in Panther Secondary Zone FWS Assigned Habitat Value per Acre Primary PHU's1 (Primary Acres x Hab. Val. X 1.0) Secondary PHU's (Secondary Acres x Hab. Val. x 0.69) 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% 0.00 0.83 5.7 0.00 3.25 Avg. 37% Exotics 0.00 0.48 3.0 0.00 1.00 261E3 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 50-74% 0.00 0.39 5.7 0.00 1.52 Avg. 62% Exotics 0.00 0.63 3.0 0.00 1.31 321E1 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 1- 24% 0.00 1.03 6.3 0.00 4.49 Avg. 12.5% Exotics 0.00 0.15 3.0 0.00 0.31 321E2 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 0.00 1.07 6.3 0.00 4.66 Avg. 37% Exotics 0.00 0.63 3.0 0.00 1.30 434E2 Hardwood-Conifer Mix, Exotics 25-49% 0.51 4.30 9.3 4.75 27.61 Avg. 37% Exotics 0.30 2.53 3.0 0.90 5.23 434E3 Hardwood-Conifer Mix, Exotics 50-74% 0.49 0.86 9.3 4.56 5.54 Avg. 62% Exotics 0.80 1.41 3.0 2.40 2.91 514 Swale 0.00 0.69 0.0 0.00 0.00 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotics 25- 49% 0.00 2.85 4.7 0.00 9.23 Avg. 37% Exotics 0.00 1.67 3.0 0.00 3.46 643E3 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50- 74% 0.05 0.54 4.7 0.21 1.74 Avg. 62% Exotics 0.07 0.87 3.0 0.22 1.81 TOTAL 2.22 20.93 13.04 75.37 88.41 *Note: 88.41 PHUs x 2.5 = 221.02 Required Offsite PHUs to Mitigate Project Impacts Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus) Florida bonneted bats are listed as Endangered by FWS. Florida bonneted bats are the largest species of bat in Florida. Although little is known about the habitat preferences of the Florida bonneted bat, evidence indicates that open freshwater and wetland habitats provide prime foraging areas. Roost sites have been observed in artificial bat boxes, roof tiles, and within woodpecker cavities in pines with an open midstory. The project area is within the FWS HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -18- designated Focal Area of the Florida Bonneted Bat. During the PSS, one potential roost tree was observed with a cavity as shown in Figure 5. However, during the survey a pileated woodpecker (Hylatomus pileatus) was observed flying to and from the cavity. Regulatory agencies may require an acoustic survey for Florida bonneted bats during the permitting process. Wading/Marsh Birds No evidence of wading bird rookeries was observed during the surveys. Most of the listed wading bird species common in Florida are transitory in nature, and can be found foraging and roosting in a wide variety of wetland habitats. Although not observed during the PSS, the little blue heron (Egretta caerulea), reddish egret (Egretta rufescens), roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja)and tricolored heron (Egretta tricolor) may occasionally utilize nearby wetlands either seasonally or year around for foraging purposes. A wading bird management plan has been included as Attachment E of the Collier County EIS to ensure no direct impacts to listed wading birds occur at time of construction. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Although the bald eagle is no longer a listed species, it is afforded protection in accordance with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The FWS has established a standard 660’ secondary and 330’ primary protection zone around a bald eagle nest for this region [FWS 2007]. Based on the FWC bald eagle nest locator (https://publictemp.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/nestlocator.aspx , site accessed August, 2017) No active bald eagle nests were documented on or within 660’ of the project site. The closest known nest is CO-037, located approximately 1.39 miles southeast of the project site. This distance exceeds any protection zones for bald eagles. Red-Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) is about seven inches long with a wingspan of about 15 inches and is listed as endangered by the USFWS. This black and white striped woodpecker has a black cap and nape that encircle large white cheek patches. RCWs typically inhabit open pine forests and are the only woodpeckers that excavate cavities exclusively in living pine trees. RCWs typically choose large, mature pines to excavate their cavity. The protected species HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -19- survey revealed no indications the property was being used by RCWs. Additionally, the property lacks the open mature pine trees preferred by RCWs. Therefore no adverse effects to RCWs are anticipated as a result of this project. HHCC – Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey -20- 5.0 REFERENCES Florida Committee on Rare and Endangered Plans and Animals. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume I. Mammals. Gainesville, Florida. 392 pp. Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Third Edition. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2011. Supplemental Information for the Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Biological Status Review Report. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2017. Bald Eagle Nest Locator. https://public.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/nestlocator.aspx (Site accessed June 1, 2017) Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2017. Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Species. http://myfwc.com/media/1515251/threatened_endangered_species.pdf (Site accessed June 1, 2017) Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2017. Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines. Tallahassee, Florida. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Soil Survey of Collier County, Florida. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx (Site accessed June 1, 2017) Steiner, T.M., O.L. Bass, Jr., and J.A. Kushlan. 1983. Status of the eastern indigo snake in southern Florida National Parks and vicinity. South Florida Research Center Report SFRC-83/01, Everglades National Park; Homestead, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Information for Planning and Conservation, Environmental Conservation Online System. 2017. http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/gettingStarted/index (Site accessed June 1, 2017) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. 23 pp. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia. 2172 pp. ATTACHMENT D FLORIDA BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY REGAL ACRES 3$5&(/% FLORIDA BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN No signs of Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) were observed during any of the surveys or site visits to the property. However, sightings of the Florida black bear have been reported to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission within the project vicinity. To reduce the potential for human-bear encounters and help protect the black bear, the following measures will be taken at the Regal Acres 3DUFHO% development: During Construction: a. The construction contractor will post a copy of the “Be Bear Aware” pamphlet produced by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission in construction trailers to advise employees and contractors of the potential for bear encounters in the area. b. Garbage cans will be stored within a secure structure until the morning before garbage collection. After Construction a. Homeowners should receive a copy of the “Be Bear Aware” pamphlet produced by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission upon moving into the neighborhood. b. Garbage cans should be stored within a secure structure until the morning before garbage collection, or bear-proof containers should be used c. Should a bear be encountered within the development, it should be left undisturbed so that it can continue to its destination. However, if a bear continues to remain in the development for several hours, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission will be contacted so that they can provide appropriate action to assist the bear out of the development. Under no condition is the bear to be disturbed, harmed, molested or fed. d. Bear relocation will only be used as a last resort if the bear continues to return and become a nuisance. All bear encounters are not considered a nuisance or a threat, unless they remain in the area for long periods or time, and continue to return over several days. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission is responsible for determining the status of the bear and what action is necessary. ATTACHMENT E WADING BIRD MANAGEMENT PLAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY REGAL ACRES 3$5&(/% WADING BIRD MANAGEMENT PLAN Although the PSS did not reveal the use of the project area by wading birds, the wetland communities and onsite ditch provide foraging opportunities for listed wading birds during the rainy season when inundated. The canal on the southern portion of the property likely provides foraging opportunities for a longer period of time due to the longer hydroperiod of the canal. Wetland impacts associated with the development will be mitigated through the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) permit processes. The loss of wading bird habitat associated with the development will also be mitigated through the purchase of wetland credits, as determined through those permits. Although no direct impacts to the nesting potential of these bird species are anticipated in association with the project, a management plan geared specifically toward enhancing remaining on-site wetland habitats in the preserve and thereby augmenting foraging opportunities for listed wading birds will be implemented at time of development. The conceptual site plan illustrates a 5.acre preserve located in the western portion of the property, which is comprised of . acres of upland habitat and 1.7acres of herbaceous wetlands. The preserve areas will be maintained free of exotic and nuisance vegetation in perpetuity, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council’s 2017 List of Invasive Plant Species, Categories I and II. Additionally, the preserve area will be placed under a conservation easement granted to the SFWMD. Additionally, the southern canal will remain post- development. The enhancement/preservation and maintenance of site wetlands will provide higher quality habitat for use by listed wading birds where use presently is expected to be minimal due to encroachment by exotic vegetation. Prior to construction, if clearing occurs during nesting season of wading birds (January – June), pre-construction nesting surveys will be conducted by a qualified biologist/ecologist to determine if there are any active nests that may be affected by the proposed project. Prior to commencement of clearing activities in wetlands, pedestrian transects will be conducted through all marshes, lake littoral areas, and the forested areas around the perimeter of marshes within the development footprint to ensure that no active nests are taken during construction. If an active nest is discovered within the project area, a buffer having a radius of approximately 125’ (500’ buffer for the Florida sandhill crane) will be cordoned off around the nest using enviro-fence. Activities will not begin within the buffer area until the project biologist determines that all young have left the nest and the nest is deemed inactive Exotic eradication will be accomplished by hand including the use of implements such as chainsaws, axes, and machetes to cut down exotic vegetation. Smaller exotic vegetation will be eradicated through complete removal or cut and treat methods. Stumps of cut plants will be chemically treated within 15 minutes of cutting. Only EPA-approved herbicides will be utilized and a visual tracer dye will be added if not already contained in the specific herbicide mixture. All herbicides will be applied in accordance with label specifications. Such applications will be conducted by or under the direction of an appropriately licensed applicator. Debris generated during exotic removal will be transported off-site for disposal. Additional wading bird foraging habitat will be provided through lake littoral planting areas, as required by Collier County LDC. The lake shorelines will be planted with native wetland herbaceous plants in various locations providing shelter to fish and invertebrates, thereby enhancing foraging opportunities for protected wading birds. Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 1 COLLIER COUNTY WAIVER APPLICATION FROM THE REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED: _______________ PLANNER: _____________________________ PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE WAIVER: PL20170001733 (To Be Completed By Zoning and Land Development Review Staff) PROJECT NAME: ___Regal Acres RPUD (Parcel B) _________________ LOCATION: (Common Description) The subject property is located on the west side of Greenway Road, approximately 3½ miles east of Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) and approximately one mile north of U.S.41.________________________________________ SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: This request is to waive historic and___________ archaeological survey and assessment due to characteristics of the property. _____________ ________________________________________________________________________ (Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator County Manager or designee to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 2 SECTION ONE: APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DATA A. Name of applicant (s) (if other than property owner, state relationship such as option holder, contract purchaser, lessee, trustee, etc.): _____________________________ Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. (owner of folios 00737760008,_______ 00741080606, 00738280008, and 00741100104; contract purchaser of folio________ 00737720006.)________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: 11145 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34113 ________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Phone: (239) 775-0036____________________ FAX: _______________________ E-Mail: _____________________________________________________________ B. Name of agent(s) for applicant, if any: Laura DeJohn, AICP, Johnson Engineering, Inc. Mailing Address: 2350 Stanford Court, Naples, FL 34112 ___________________________________________________________________ Phone: (239) 334-0046 FAX: (239) 334-3661 E-Mail: ldejohn@johnsoneng.com C. Name of owner(s) of property: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. (owner of folios 00737760008, 00741080606, 00738280008, and 00741100104; _________ GHU, LLC, Ronald Monachino, and Newell Creek, LLC (owners of folio_________ 00737720006.)_______________________________________________________ Mailing Address: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc., 11145 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34113 ___________________________________________ GHU, LLC, Ronald Monachino, and Newell Creek, LLC, 8654 Camelot Dr.,______ Chesterland, OH 44026-3104____________________________________________ Phone: ( ) _____________________________ FAX: ___________________ E-Mail: _____________________________________________________________ Note: If names in answers to A and/or B are different than name in C, notarized letter(s) of authorization from property owner (C) must be attached. See attached notarized authorizations from Habitat for Humanity; GHU, LLC; and Newell Creek, LLC. Refer to owner documentation for Ronald Monachino in Submittal 2 dated 1/19/18 for PL20170001733. Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 3 SECTION TWO: SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA (Attach copy of the plat book page (obtainable from Clerk’s Office at the original scale) with subject property clearly marked.) A. Legal description of subject property. Answer only 1 or 2, as applicable. 1. Within platted subdivision, recorded in official Plat Books of Collier County. Subdivision Name: __________n/a ____________________________ Plat Book ________ Page ________ Unit _______ Block _______ Lot ________ Section __________ Township __________ Range __________ 2. If not in platted subdivision, a complete legal description must be attached which is sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property on County maps or aerial photographs. The legal description must include the Section, Township and Range. If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be submitted. See attached Legal Description and Boundary Survey. B. Property dimensions: Area: 1,008,414 square feet, or 23.15 (Parcel B) acres Width along roadway: + 1,383 feet (Parcel A frontage along Greenway Road) Depth: + 680 feet______________________________________________________ C. Present use of property: Development PARCEL B is 23.15 acres and currently vacant.______________________________________________________________ D. Present zoning classification: PARCEL B is zoned Rural Agricultural (A), subject to request for rezoning to Regal Acres RPUD. Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 4 SECTION THREE: WAIVER CRITERIA Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been excavated. A. Waiver Request Justification. 1. Interpretation of Aerial Photograph A majority of the site is vegetated with exotics. Remnant agricultural ditches are also present._________________ 2. Historical Land Use Description: Previous uses in this vicinity were farm field. The site it currently vacant and has not been cleared for several years. The site is not near any known resources and not within an area of historical/archaeological probability. 3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: The site is comprised of Abandoned Agriculture, Palmetto Prairie, Hardwood-Conifer Mix, and Wet Prairie, all of which are disturbed from 10% to 74% with exotics. Swales occupy 0.69 acres of the site. Approximately 6.05 acres is a disturbed wetland community (FLUCFCS Code 643E2 and 643E3). 4. Other:See attached Florida Master Site File letter and map indicating no structures, cemeteries or sites on file for the Section/Township/Range of the subject site. B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County Commissioners. Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 5 SECTION FOUR: CERTIFICATION A. The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this application. Any time delays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal of inaccurate or incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant. B. All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record and shall be a permanent part of the file. C. All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently fold to fit into a legal size (8 ½” x 14”) folder. ___ Signature of Applicant or Agent Laura DeJohn, AICP Printed Name of Applicant or Agent ===================================================================== -TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION- SECTION FIVE: NOTICE OF DECISION The County Manager or designee has made the following determination: Approved on: _____________ By:______________________________ Approved with Conditions on: ____________ By: _____________________________ (see attached) Denied on: _______________ By: ______________________________ (see attached) )BCJUBUGPS)VNBOJUZPG$PMMJFS$PVOUZ *OD RegalAcresIIRPUDͲLegalDescription August2017Page3of3 REGALACRESIIRPUD EXHIBITD LegalDescriptionforAdditional23.15Acres DESCRIPTION PARCELNo.00737760008&00741080606 (ORB3935,PG3581) THEWEST1/2OFTHEEAST1/2OFTHEEAST1/2OFTHENORTHWEST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OF SECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,EXCEPTINGTHENORTH30FEETTHEREOF, WHICHISRESERVEDFORROADPURPOSES,ANDTHEEAST1/2OFTHEEAST1/2OFTHEEAST1/2OF THENORTHWEST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST, EXCEPTINGTHENORTH30FEETTHEREOF, WHICHISRESERVEDFORROADPURPOSES, OFTHEPUBLICRECORDSOFCOLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA. TOGETHERWITHTHEFOLLOWINGDESCRIBEDPARCEL: PARCELNo.00738280008 (ORB4467,PG1397) NORTH1/2OFTHESW1/4OFTHENW1/4OFTHENE1/4OFTHENE1/4OFSECTION12,TRACT51 SOUTH,RANGE26E.PROPERTYACQUIREDBYTAXDEEDOFFICIALRECORDSBOOK875,PAGE445,OF THEPUBLICRECORDSOFCOLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA TOGETHERWITHTHEFOLLOWINGDESCRIBEDPARCEL: PARCELNo.00737720006 (ORB5083,PG657) THEWEST1/2OFTHEEAST1/2OFTHENORTHWEST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OFSECTION12, TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,CONTAININGTEN(10)ACRES,MOREORLESS,EXCEPTINGTHE NORTH30FEETTHEREOF,WHICHISRESERVEDFORROADPURPOSES. TOGETHERWITHTHEFOLLOWINGDESCRIBEDPARCEL: PARCELNo.00741100104 (ORB270,PG867) (PERTITLECOMMITMENT) THENORTH30FEETOFTHENORTHWEST1/4(NW1/4)OFTHENORTHEAST1/4(NE1/4)OFSECTION 12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,COLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA,LESSANDEXCEPTIONTHAT PORTIONLYINGINTHEWEST1/2OFTHEWEST1/2OFTHENORTHWEST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4. ALSOBEINGDESCRIBEDASFOLLOWS: THEEAST1,018.64FEETOFTHENORTH30FEETOFTHENORTHWEST1/4OFTHENORTHEAST1/4OF SECTION12,TOWNSHIP51SOUTH,RANGE26EAST,COLLIERCOUNTY,FLORIDA. V A C A N T1,008,460 SQ. FT. / 23.15 ACRES±DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONSDESCRIPTIONDATEJOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2122 JOHNSON STREETP.O. BOX 1550FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550PHONE: (239) 334-0046FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #64206-21-172017007812-51-261"=100'1 OF 1SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EASTCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAHABITAT FOR HUMANITYOF COLLIER COUNTY, INC.A PARCEL OF LANDLYING INBOUNDARYSURVEY 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 • www.flheritage.com/preservation/sitefile 850.245.6440 ph | 850.245.6439 fax | SiteFile@dos.state.fl.us This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information. January 11, 2018 Laura DeJohn Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson St Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone: 239.334.0046 Email: LKS@johnsoneng.com In response to your inquiry of January 10, 2018 the Florida Master Site File lists no archaeological sites, two linear resources, and no standing structures found in the following section of Collier County: T 51S R 26E S 12 as shown on corresponding map. When interpreting the results of our search, please consider the following information: x This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. x Because vandalism and looting are common at Florida sites, we ask that you limit the distribution of location information on archaeological sites. x While many of our records document historically significant resources, the documentation of a resource at the Florida Master Site File does not necessarily mean the resource is historically significant. x Federal, state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, Cody VanderPloeg Archaeological Data Analyst Florida Master Site File Cody.VanderPloeg@dos.myflorida.com CR00928 CR00927 51S26E012 51S26E013 51S26E001 51S27E00751S26E011 51S27E01851S26E014 51S27E00651S26E002 Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Cultural Resource Search T51S R26E S12 Collier County January 2018 ¯ 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40.05 Miles Legend %2 Florida Structures Florida Sites Historical Cemeteries Resource Groups TRS HistoricalBridges SiteID Type SiteName Address AdditionalInfo SHPOEval NRStatusCR00927RG USͲ41LinearResourceͲ1ContribResources EligibleCR00928RG TamiamiCanalLinearResourceͲ1ContribResources EligibleAR=0SS=0CM=0RG=2BR=0Total=2CulturalResourceRosterPage1of1Created:1/11/2018FloridaMasterSiteFile COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 8 of 16 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ KŶůLJĂƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŝƐƉůĂƚƚĞĚ͘ ϬϬϳϯϳϳϮϬϬϬϲ͕ϬϬϳϰϭϭϬϬϭϬϰ͕ ϬϬϳϯϳϳϲϬϬϬϴ͕ϬϬϳϰϭϬϴϬϲϬϲ͕ϬϬϳϯϴϮϴϬϬϬϴ Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples FL 34113 (239) 775-0036 (239) 775-0477 nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org Naples FL 34114 12 51 26 See Exhibit D. 116 dwelling units 118 GPM 41,412 GPD 78 GPM 27,608 GPD August 2019 ✔ ✔ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 2/21/2017 Page 9 of 16 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. N/A Acknowledged. REGALACRESIIRPUD RegalAcresIIRPUDͲDeviationsJustifications August201ϴPage1of2 DEVIATIONSΘJUSTIFICATIONS Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, “Street System Requirements,” which calls for minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet. This request is to allow for a 5-foot right-of-way minimum width for a limited section of the private street network, extending for a length of approximately 350 feet and terminating in a hammerhead or Y configuration. Minimum right-of-way width of 5 feet is requested to address a limited section of the private street network in the northern vicinity of the site. This segment of the private street network is approximately 350 feet in length and will serve approximately 20 homesites at the most. It is appropriate for this intimately scaled street to have 10-foot wide lanes corresponding to a more context sensitive human scale. This reduces impervious area and reduces land dedicated to roadway by ten feet, which in turn allows for more open space throughout the site that provides more community benefit. A 5-foot right-of-way is adequate to achieve safe and efficient vehicular, emergency vehicle, and pedestrian movement while satisfying utility and drainage needs in this location. Aside from this segment of the private street network, the other roads within the RPUD will be consistent with a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, “On-Premises Directional Signs,” which requires on-premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10 feet from edge of roadway, paved surface or back of curb. This deviation requests a minimum setback of 5 feet from the edge of private roadway/drive aisle. This deviation will allow locational flexibility for directional signage internal to the RPUD. This also allows for helpful directional signage to be located between the edge of the roadway and the sidewalk. A unified design theme will apply to all signage throughout the community, thereby ensuring a cohesive appearance and attractiveness. All directional signage will meet the Clear Sight Distance requirements in accordance with LDC Section 6.06.05. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a, “Trees and Palms”, which states that no more than 30% of required canopy trees may be substituted by palms. This deviation requests to increase the allowable substitution of palms to up to 60% of required canopy trees used to satisfy individual residential lot requirements (of LDC section 4.06.05.A.1). The intent is to relocate the required residential lot-tree plantings to the right-of-way and common areas where they can be maintained by the HOA and provide enhanced aesthetics around the walkways and on-street parking. Street trees may be planted in close proximity to underground utilities and sidewalks. Allowing up to 60% of the plantings in this area to be palms will reduce the degree of tree health issues in the future, minimize the impact of street trees on the utilities, and reduce the likelihood of roots heaving sidewalks or on street parking. The quality appearance of a well landscaped community and treelined streets is still accomplished and is more sustainable with the proposed palms substituting for up to 60% of canopy trees. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, “Fences and Walls” which calls for a maximum fence or wall height of IHHW DQG6 feet in residential components of PUDs. This deviation requests allowance for a maximum wall height of 8 feet PHDVXUHGIURPQHDUHVWILQLVKHG IORRUHOHYDWLRQfor buffering DORQJWKHH[WHUQDO38'ERXQGDULHV and protection from the drainage ditch to the south. The proposed deviation will provide the adjacent West Wind mobile home park and future neighbors additional visual screening and provide a protective barrier between the proposed REGALACRESIIRPUD DEVIATIONSΘJUSTIFICATIONS RegalAcresIIRPUDͲDeviationsJustifications August201ϴPage2of2 recreational area and the existing drainage ditch to the south. This enhances aesthetics and protects the children who will be likely to play in the recreation area. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, “Dead End Streets”, which calls for dead ends streets to terminate in a cul-de-sac. This deviation requests the ability to end one of the street segments within the PUD with a hammerhead or Y configuration as approved by the local Fire District. This deviation request applies to the limited section of the private street network in the northern vicinity of the site. This segment of the private street network is approximately 350 feet in length and will serve approximately 20 homesites at the most. A full-sized cul-de-sac on a short street of approximately 350 feet is a very inefficient use of space. The alternative fire department turnaround options of a hammerhead or “Y” can more effectively serve the circulation needs of this specific location, resulting in enhancement to the overall development by providing added amenities, landscaping, and open space while still providing adequate room for fire trucks to maneuver safely in the proposed location. 55' ROW CROSS SECTIONREGAL ACRES II - RPUDDEVIATION 1HABITAT FOR HUMANITYCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA T - TURNY - TURNFIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESSREGAL ACRES II - RPUDDEVIATION 5HABITAT FOR HUMANITYCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BoundarySurvey ExistingRegalIPlat BoundarySurvey ExistingRegalIReͲplat BoundarySurvey 23.15ͲacreAddition V A C A N T1,008,460 SQ. FT. / 23.15 ACRES±DATE:PROJECT NO.FILE NO.SCALE:SHEET NUMBERREVISIONSDESCRIPTIONDATEJOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.2122 JOHNSON STREETP.O. BOX 1550FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550PHONE: (239) 334-0046FAX: (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #64206-21-172017007812-51-261"=100'1 OF 1SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EASTCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAHABITAT FOR HUMANITYOF COLLIER COUNTY, INC.A PARCEL OF LANDLYING INBOUNDARYSURVEY School District Review Planned Unit Development to PUD Rezone Approved 02/20/2018 02/20/2018 Reviewer: James Sabo ((239) 252-2708) Send Email Corrections: Correction 1: Miscellaneous Corrections Status: Resolved Date Status Changed: 02/20/2018 Comments: A School District Review was requested of Collier County Schools. No Review Comments were provided. However, review comments from the Collier Schools may be forthcoming. School District Review provided on 2/20/18 by Amy Lockhart: At this time there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development either within the concurrency service areas the development is located within or the adjacent concurrency service areas at the elementary, middle and high school levels. This finding is for planning and informational purposes only and does not constitute either a reservation of capacity or a finding of concurrency for the proposed project. At the time of site plan or plat the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity within the concurrency service area the development is located within and adjacent concurrency service areas such that the level of service standards are not exceeded. Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSFMFMHCGTotals by YrGrandTotalGrand TotalInsert totals by unit type by years.Unit Types:SF = Single FamilyMF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile HomesC = Condo/Co-OpG = Government EXAMPLE:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSF 25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MH N/ACN/AGN/ATotals by Yr75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Grand Total150.258 58-- -- -- 58 58 -- -- -- -- -- -- --116 Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: -School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; -Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency Determination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. 3 9.A.9 Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Legal Ad - Agenda ID 6777 (6777 : PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres)