Agenda 09/08/2005 CRA
09/08/2005 15:01 FAl 8417743802
Bee
~ IlANAGER'R OFFICE 1iJI00l
COUJER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
HAymORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE AREA
SEPTEMBER 8. 2005
AGENDA
3:00-4:30PM
1. Ron Call
2. Adoption of the Agenda
3. Adoption of Minutes of Joint Workshop May 11. 200s
4. CommnDÏt".ftions
a. CRA Local Advisory Board Chairman Update
S. CoD8Cllt
a. Budget Amendment - Davis Blvd Median Landscape
b. Budget Amendment - US4 I/Davis Blvd Intersection Landscape
c. Budget Amendment - PurclJue of Computer Systems
d. CRA Offico Lease Renewal
6. OJd Business
a. Site Improvemem Gram - Resolution and Program Update
b. Sugden Park Public Access - 'BoWücal Place' Easement
7. New Business
a. Corridor Analysis - Baysbore & Shadowlawn Drives
b. Gateway Streetscape Project - Shadowlawn Drive &: Linwood Avenue
c. Bayshore Streetscape Project - Lakeview &: Riverview Drives
d. Baysbore & Gateway Overlays - Redevelopment Incentives
e. Gateway Triangle - 'TbaIheimer' Redevelopment Project
f. Approval for New CRA Hire - Project Maru.gcr
8. Citizen Comments
9. Adjownment
.""..~,---""""'.""'''>--_.~.~,,_... -,...",..-.--.-.-.-
COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
BA YSHORE GA TEW A Y TRIANGLE AREA
SEPTEMBER 8, 2005
3:00 - 4:30PM
AGENDA
1. Roll Call
2. Adoption of the Agenda
3. Adoption of Minutes of Joint Workshop May 11,2005
4. Communications
a. CRA Local Advisory Board Chairman Update
5. Consent
a. Budget Amendment - Davis Blvd Median Landscape
b. Budget Amendment - US41fDavis Blvd Intersection Landscape
c. Budget Amendment - Purchase of Computer Systems
d. CRA Office Lease Renewal
6. Old Business
a. Site Improvement Grant - Resolution and Program Update
b. Sugden Park Public Access .- 'Botanical Place' Easement
7. New Business
a. Corridor Analysis - Bayshore & Shadowlawn Drives
b. Gateway Streetscape Project - Shadowlawn Drive & Linwood Avenue
c. Bayshore Streetscape Project - Lakeview & Riverview Drives
d. Bayshore & Gateway Overlays - Redevelopment Incentives
e. Gateway Triangle - 'Thalheimer' Redevelopment Project
f. Approval for New CRA Hire - Project Manager
8. Citizen Comments
9. Adjournment
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE CRA - BA YSHORE/GATEW A Y CRA WORKSHOP
Naples, Florida, May 1 1,2005
LET IT BE REMEMBERED. that the CRA - Bayshore/Gateway CRA Workshop in and for the
County of Collier, having conducted business herein. met on this date at 2:30 P.M. in WORKSHOP
SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex. East Naples. Florida with the following
members present:
CHAIRMAN: Commissioner Donna Fiala, CRA
Commissioner James Coletta
Commissioner Frank Halas
Commissioner Tom Henning
Commissioner Fred Coyle (absent)
CHAIRMAN: Bill Neal, Advisory Board
David Jackson, Executive Directòr
Ron Gamer
Chuck Gunther
Phil McCabe
William Mears
ALSO PRESENT: Jim Mudd, County Manager
Randall Cohen, Comprehensive Planning
Patrick White, Assistant County Attorney
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Neal at 2:32 P. M.
II Roll Call
Roll call was taken and a quorum established.
(Mr. McCabe arrived at 2:35)
ID. Opening Remarks
Bill Neal commented the advisory board is ready to move from study to action:
1. By presenting the first annual planning report, whose objective is to review a comprehensive plan
joining the business sector in partnership with Collier County and the Bayshore MSTU
2. By stating that hiring of a professional Executive Director has proved a positive move.
3. In noting that the CRA advisory board is at this time the BCC. He stated the advisory board is
aware of their time constraints and is committed to be responsible & reliant, promising maximum
results.
4. Introductions of advisory board members.
Chairman Donna Fiala expressed CRA Board's appreciation of teamwork and efforts put
forth and are looking forward for what is to come.
IV. Old Business:
David Jackson gave a verbal update with objectives to:
Revising site improvement grant program, rewriting entire grant to comply with all
requirements, working with county attorneys and LDC regarding Bayshore and also Gateway
Triangle.
o Davis Blvd. beautification -CRA will pay from their funds, bringing transportation funds into it
also
o Davis Blvd. lighting needs at both Airport and 41, funds for that by 2007
o Sidewalk grant - issues with sewer line - once resolved wi11 facilitate CDBG grant
o Stormwater project-retention pond - attending all meetings - land acquisition - flooding issues -
participating in acquisition as partnerships
o Streetscape-do all landscape, lighting, trees, swales, parking etc. when pipes & asphalt laid so all
done at once
o Consulting contract with HDR INe. of Jacksonville, who built approved overlay for Bayshore &
will also build overlay for Gateway. Mixed use program and architectural controls to mirror that of
Bayshore with LDC and BCC approvals
v. New Business:
David Jackson spoke on the importance of communications with the residential, retail and
business community by various means, citing:
o CRA's creation ofa large data base for weekly mailings and e-mails
o Working with the County Manager; attending meetings with county departments and employees in
the different areas of concern, to learn what they require with timeframes and criteria.
o Partnering with the business community, MSTU, the city of Naples and financial organizations.
o Looking to leverage CRA funds with funds ofMSTU, DOT, grants and County.
o Taking some funds for streetscapes in neighborhoods in East Naples & 41 areas
o Showing that private sector development has positive interest in area that CRA has promoted in the
last 5 years. Investors with money, programs and ideas are fixing up, upgrading & investing in
area because they believe in area.
(HANDOUT) Annual Goals-Mission Statement-Summary items.
David Jackson covered items in the handout, which included tables and graphs showing
priorities, funding, short & long-term goals, effects of taxes and a proposed budget with a 5 year
timetable. Questions & answers followed.
VI. CRA Board Comments:
Commissioner Tom Henning asked about Bayshore/Gateway Master Plan and zoning & use
issues. His questions concerned budget items and what, if any, uses would be removed in a
revised LDC plan. Bill Neal responded that the Master Plan is in the works.
Patrick White, Assistant County Attorney explained that no changes proposed in this round
ofLDC amendments. May change in future. BCC has ultimate say. Owners will have option
to remain same or implement overlay provisions.
David Jackson, Executive Director commented that of all the C-4, C-5 areas in the county,
50% of them are in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle. He stated the zoning would stay the same
with a mixed-use option if an owner or buyer wishes to change use. They will then go through
the normal fe-zoning process. Redevelopment plan in itself does not include a zoning change.
Commissioner Jim Coletta brought in some points on: rights of just use that owners are
entitled to; could boundaries of overlay area be expanded; Teaching a saturation point and what
uses of funds at that point. He requested a copy of the statistics report regarding 50% data for
C-4, C-5 areas. Mr. Jackson will get details for him.
Commissioner Frank Halas asked about capacity for mixed industrial entities. He had
questions regarding the duration of the CRA once redevelopment projects are finished and
funds are still being generated. Could CRA be extended & should it be a perpetual entity.
Commissioner Donna Fiala inquired if CRA can say no more funds needed or can use in an
expanded area.
David Jackson stated CRA is created and can be dissolved by BCC.
Patrick White, Assistant County Attorney explained that the CRA is created by Statutes to
operate within a plan. When plan is accomplished, plan is ended by the plan itself or by action
of government.
County Manager, Jim Mudd stated that the City of Naples CRA plan sunsets in 30 years,
based on their Charter.
Questions & discussion followed on different budget items.
VII. Affordable Housin2
Advisory Board Chairman Bill Neal requested that the CRA board be represented on
Affordable Housing Committee, as affordable housing needs in CRA are high. New
developments give opportunity to set aside & encourage workforce & affordable housing.
Commissioners Fiala, Coletta and Halas offered suggestions to network with police and fire
departments, hospitals, schools, & government to partner in finding funding to create buy-ins,
grants and commitments from other agencies.
Advisory Board Member Phil McCabe explained some developer's problems with providing
affordable housing such as 10%, fast tracking of permitting, deferred impact fees and bonus
density. Keeping costs down will help developers to provide this type of housing.
CRA O~anization
Advisory Board Chairman Bill Neal provided an organizational chart recommending
dissolving the advisory board and keeping the CRA Board distinct and separate from governing
body. The BCC would still appoint CRA Board and that Board will still report to BCC who
will monitor & oversee.
Discussion followed about the issue and will be further discussed at future time.
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned
by the order of the Chair at 3:47 P.M.
*****
COLLIER COUNTY CRA
CRA Chairman, Commissioner Donna Fiala
..--.-.....'.-...--'-
ITEM 5a - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO APPROVE A $20,992 BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR FUND 187 BA YSHORE
GA TEW A Y TRIANGLE CRA TO TRANSFER TO FUND 112 TO REIMBURSE
COUNTY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
PROJECT IN THE DAVIS BLVD MEDIANS AT BROOKSIDE DRIVE
OBJECTIVE: To approve a $20,992 budget amendment for Fund 187 Bayshore Gateway
Triangle CRA to transfer to Fund 112 to reimburse the County for the installation of a landscape
and irrigation project in the Davis Blvd medians at the Brookside Drive intersection.
CONSIDERATIONS: At the February 1,2005 CRA Advisory Board meeting, the Board agreed
to a partnership with the County Transportation Department to have the County pay for the
design of irrigation and landscape in the bare medians on Davis Blvd at the Brookside Drive
intersection, and the CRA would pay for the installation. At the July 12, 2005 Advisory Board
meeting, the Board reviewed the bid/estimate in Collier County Bid #05-3830 (Brookside
Planting Addendum #3) of$19,083.20 plus 10% contingency, and approved recommending
approval to the CRA Board.
The BCC has approved County Bid #05-3830 (Executive Summary attached as backup).
FISCAL IMP ACT: The CRA Advisory Board has determined that the TIF Trust Fund has
adequate reserves to contract for the construction if approved by the CRA Board.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County, including the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, that may consider alternative land
use plans, modifications to development standards, and incentives to encourage redevelopment.
RECOMMENDA nON: CRA Board approve expenditure CRA Trust Funds to install the
landscape project under the Collier County landscape contract, and approve a Fund 187 (Reserve
for Capital) budget amendment to transfer $20,992 TIF Trust Funds to Fund 112 Landscaping
Reserves to reimburse the County.
SUBMITTED BY: DAVID JACKSON
DATE:
REVEIWED BY: CRA ADVISORY BOARD_
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
s.:ptcmlx:r 8. 2005 ßayshorc Gatcway Triangle CRA Mceting
DAVIS BLVD AT BROOKSIDE DRIVE MEDIAN
&ptember 8. 2005 Bayshor" Gateway Triangle CR.~ \1e.;,Üng
'")
¿.
-
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST
For BudgelfFinan.:e l'se Only
BA= ........
JE;.:..
BAR"........
A.P.H. Date..
Fund Number 187
Fund Description
Date Prepared: 6/27/05
Approved by nec on: 7/26/05
---
Attach Executive Summary
Item No.:
Fund Center Title:
WBS Element Title:
(If a l-'roiecL
Fund
I Center
919010
Expense Budget Detail
Rescrvcs - Bayshore Gatc\vay Triangle - CRA..
Fd Ctr No. 919010
WBS No:
WBS
Element
Net Change to Budget _
(20.992)
Fund Center Title:
WBS Element Title:
(If a Pro·eel roliide Ihe WBS element information; ¡fit's for a 000-
I Fund I WBS Commit
I Center I Element Item
929010 I 911120
Expense Budget Detail
Fund Transfer
Fd Ctr No.: 929010
WBS No.:
Revised --I
Bud et j
o : 20.992 I
I
1
~
Net Change to Budget
20,992
Expense Budget Detaü
Fund Center Title:
WBS Element Title:
Fd Ctr No.
WBS No.:
Fund I WBS I Commit
Center I Element I Item
Commitment Item
Descri tion
Revised
Bud et
I
I
--i
i
r--
Net Change to Budget
Revenue Budget Detail
Fund Center Title:
WBS Element Title:
(If a Proi.:ct., movide the WBS dement information: ¡firs tOr a non-proiect a<xoum. Dl'ovìdc the fund center information.)
I Fund !WBS I Commit Commitment Item i Increase I Current I Revised
i I
Center i Element Item Description (Decrease) \ Budget
Budget --
I i
i -I i
,
! j
! I
I I
I I !
Fd Ctr No.:
WBS No.:
Net Change to Budget
EXPLANA TION
'Why are funds needed? The Bayshore Gateway CRA is contributing to the Davis Blvd.
landscaping and irrigation renovation. Since Project 60098 in Fund 112 bas sufficient budget
to complete the project as designed and bid. tbe contributed funds from 187 will be budgeted
in Fund Il2 reserves.
Wbere are funds available? Fund 187 reserves.
REVIEW PROCESS
DATE
Cost Center Director:
Division Administrator:
Finance De artment:
Clerk of Board Admin.:
Input by:
B.A. No.:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to award Collier County Bid #05-3830 Davis Boulevard
Landscape and Irrigation Renovations to Vila & Son Landscaping Corporation
with a base bid amount of $112,858.75 and the Brookside Planting Addendum #3
bid alternate of $19,083.20 plus a 10% contingency for a total of $145,136.14.
OBJECTIVE: To provide landscape and irrigation renovations on Davis Boulevard (US41 East
to Airport Pulling) as approved by the Streetscape Master Plan.
CONSIDERATION:
1. On April 6, 2005, the Purchasing Department sent notices to 114 vendors for the
landscaping and irrigation installation of Bid #05-3830 Davis Boulevard Landscape and
Irrigation Renovations." There were 12 packages requested for this bid.
2. On April 26, a non-mandatory pre-bid meeting was held, at which time all prospective
bidders had questions answered regarding the bidding documents for this project.
3. On May 6, 2005 bids were received and opened. Staff reviewed the unit pricing on the
bid tab, and Vila & Son Landscaping Corporation submitted the lowest bid.
Staff recommends awarding the base bid contract of $112,858.75 and the Brookside
Planting Addendum #3 bid alternate of $19,083.20 plus a 10% contingency in the
amount of $13,194.69 to Vila & Son Landscaping Corporation for a total of 145,136.14.
The Bayshore CRA will provide funding for Addendum #3 bid alternate and reimburse
Collier County Transportation (Fund 112, Project # 60098). The Bayshore CRA
Advisory Board will be reviewing this item at their June 7, 2005 meeting and will advise
Transportation at that time. If the Advisory Board does not approve Addendum #3,
Transportation would have the option to change order and delete this item.
FISCAL IMPACT: Total funds for the base bid, addendum #3 bid alternate, and contingency
are $145,136.14, which is budgeted in project #60098.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated with
this Executive Summary.
RECOMMENDA TION: That the Board award Collíer County Bid #05-3830 Davis
Boulevard Landscape and Irrigation Renovations to Vila & Son Landscaping
Corporation in the amount of $145,136.14, approve any related change orders for
Addendum #3 bid alternate, approve related County costs, and authorize the Chairman
to execute the standard contract after review by the County Attorney's Office.
Prepared By: Pamela Lulich, RLA, ASLA, Project Manager, Alternative Transportation Modes
Attachments: Bid #05-3830 Bid-Tab document
Seplemher 8.2005 Bayshorc tJale"ay Triangle CR.\ ~Ieeting 3
ITEM 5b - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO APPROVE A $12,000 BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR FUND 187 BA YSHORE
GATEWAY TRIANGLE CRA TO TRANSFER TO FUND 112 TO REIMBURSE
COUNTY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
PROJECT AT THE US41 / DAVIS BLVD INTERSECTION
OBJECTIVE: To approve a $12,000 budget amendment for Fund 187 Bayshofe Gateway
Triangle CRA (Reserve for Capital) to transfers to Fund 1 12 (landscaping reserves) to reimburse
the County for the installation of a landscape and irrigation project at the US41/ Davis Blvd
intersection.
CONSIDERATIONS: At the February 1,2005 CRA Advisory Board meeting, the Board agreed
to a partnership with the County Transportation Department to have the County pay for the
design of irrigation and landscape at the point of land at the intersection of US41 and Davis
Blvd, and the CRA would pay for the installation of the project. At the July 12, 2005 Advisory
Board meeting, the Board reviewed the bid/estimate of $1 0,833 received by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT: The CRA Advisory Board has determined that the TIF Trust Fund has
adequate reserves to contract for the construction if approved by the CRA Board.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County, including the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, that may consider alternative land
use plans, modifications to development standards, and incentives to encourage redevelopment.
RECOM:MENDATION: CRA Board approve a Fund 187 budget amendment to allocate funds
from Reserves for Capital to be transferred to Fund I 12 Landscaping Reserves and the
expenditure of not to exceed $12,000 TIF (includes 10% contingency) Trust Funds to install the
US41 I Davis Blvd landscape project under the Collier County landscape contract Bid #05-3830.
SUBMITTED BY: DAVID JACKSON
DATE:
REVEIWED BY: CRA ADVISORY BOARD_
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
SeptemÞer 8. 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CR.'\ \h:.:ting
-' '-'-'~-~"--'---'--"""--'''µ_.'-'''''-'-''''---''''''''='~~~''''"---'
US41 I Davis Blvd
CRA Funded Landscape Project ---
""
"
"
'-.,
,
..
"',
"-
.\..,-......~
.
, .
'i.:;.. ";"+. 'W
.....j ~
Sepl~mher 8. 2005 ßavshor~ Gal~way Trìang .: CRA \Ie.:ting 2
---.-.-...+-"'-"--.-.-"-.--~-'.'"'-~--'"...'..-----.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to award Collier County Bid #05-3830 Davis Boulevard
Landscape and Irrigation Renovations to Vila & Son Landscaping Corporation
with a base bid amount of $112,858.75 and the Brookside Planting Addendum #3
bid alternate of $19,083.20 plus a 10% contingency for a total of $145,136.14.
OBJECTIVE: To provide landscape and irrigation renovations on Davis Boulevard (US41 East
to Airport Pulling) as approved by the Streetscape Master Plan.
CONSIDERATION:
1. On April 6, 2005, the Purchasing Department sent notices to 114 vendors for the
landscaping and irrigation installation of Bid #05-3830 Davis Boulevard Landscape and
Irrigation Renovations." There were 12 packages requested for this bid.
2. On April 26, a non-mandatory pre-bid meeting was held, at which time all prospective
bidders had questions answered regarding the bidding documents for this project.
3. On May 6, 2005 bids were received and opened. Staff reviewed the unit pricing on the
bid tab, and Vila & Son Landscaping Corporation submitted the lowest bid.
Staff recommends awarding the base bid contract of $112,858.75 and the Brookside
Planting Addendum #3 bid alternate of $19,083.20 plus a 10% contingency in the
amount of $13,194.69 to Vila & Son Landscaping Corporation for a total of 145,136.14.
The Bayshore CRA will provide funding for Addendum #3 bid alternate and reimburse
Collier County Transportation (Fund 112, Project # 60098). The Bayshore CRA
Advisory Board will be reviewing this item at their June 7, 2005 meeting and will advise
Transportation at that time. If the Advisory Board does not approve Addendum #3,
Transportation would have the option to change order and delete this item.
FISCAL IMPACT: Total funds for the base bid, addendum #3 bid alternate, and contingency
are $145,136.14, which is budgeted in project #60098.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated with
this Executive Summary.
RECOMMENDA TION: That the Board award Collier County Bid #05-3830 Davis
Boulevard Landscape and Irrigation Renovations to Vila & Son Landscaping
Corporation in the amount of $145, 136. 14, approve any related change orders for
Addendum #3 bid alternate, approve related County costs, and authorize the Chairman
to execute the standard contract after review by the County Attorney's Office.
Prepared By: Pamela Lulich, RLA, ASLA, Project Manager, Alternative Transportation Modes
Attachments: Bid #05-3830 Bid-Tab document
Sept-'mber 8. 2005 Rayshore (ìal-'way Triangl<: CRA Meeting 3
-
-
ITEM 5c - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO APPROVE A FUND 187 BA YSHORE GA TEW A Y TRIANGLE BUDGET
AMENDMENT OF $3000 FROM RESERVES TO ACQUIRE COMPUTER SYSTEMS
OBJECTIVE: To receive CRA approval for a FY2005 budget amendment and to purchase new
computers (laptop and desktop).
CONSIDERATIONS: When the FY2005 budget was written, a lone item (object code) was not
funded for office computers. Current computers are 1999 hand-me-downs with 2000 Windows
operating systems, and are no longer under warranty. The laptop screen has failed and must be
connected to a desktop monitor in order to perform work or access its hard drive data.
FlSCAL IMPACT: The CRA Trust Fund has adequate reserves to cover the budget amendment.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management PIan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County, including the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, that may consider alternative land
use plans, modifications to development standards, and incentives to encourage redevelopment
RECOMMENDATION: CRA Board approve a Fund 187 Budget Amendment of $3000 and
approve Executive Director to purchase new computer systems through County IT.
SUBMITTED BY: DAVID JACKSON
DATE:
REVEIWED BY: _CRA ADVISORY BOARD_
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
S.:plcmbcf 8. 2005 Bayshof<: G"lçwa~ Triangk CR.\ \!c.:ting
ITEM 5d - EXECUTIVE SU MMARY
TO APPROVE A NEW LEASE WITH NEW LANDLORD, 'LINWOOD COMMONS',
FOR THE BA YSHORE GA TEW A Y TRIANGLE CRA OFFICE
OBJECTIVE: To receive CRA approval for the CRA Chairman to sign a lease with the new
owner of the property where the CRA office is located.
CONSIDERATIONS: The leased office space for the CRA office has been sold. The business
name that the CRA writes checks to has also changed. To keep the paperwork and financial
process with the Clerk of the Court's office, a new lease should be executed with the new owner.
The terms of the original lease remain the same.
FISCAL IMP ACT: None. The CRA lease terms do not change This is an annually budgeted
item.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: CRA Board approve the execution of a new lease for the CRA office,
and authorize the CRA Chairman to sign
SUBMITTED BY: DAVID JACKSON
DATE:
REVEIWED BY: CRA ADVISORY BOARD
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
Sept..>mber S. 2005 Bayshorc GaICW,¡y Triangle CU.-\ \kdíng
ITEM 6a - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE BA YSHORE GA TEW A Y
TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM
OBJECTIVE: To approve a resolution to amend the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment
Area Site Improvement Grant program.
CONSIDERATIONS: Collier County Ordinance 2002-38 created the Site Improvement Grant
for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area. The ordinance provided that the CRA
Board may amend the Site Improvement Grant by resolution. The attached resolution amends the
Bayshore Gateway Triangle Site Improvement Grant program.
The CRA Local Advisory Board has monitored the Site Improvement Grant for the CRA for
three years. A thorough review of the program and its process by the Advisory Board, the
Executive Director and County Assistant Attorney determined that the program should be
amended to streamline the grant application/review/approval process and better serve the
community.
FISCAL IMP ACT: None.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County, including the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, that may consider alternative land
use plans, modifications to development standards, and incentives to encourage redevelopment.
RECOMMENDATION: CRA Board approve the attached resolution and amended Site
Improvement Grant program for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area.
SUBMITTED BY: DA VID JACKSON
DATE:
REVElWED BY: CRA ADVISORY BOARD_
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
September 8. 2005 Bayshore Gah:way Triangle CRA \Ieeling
_._~*.-.--,,--.---,,-_.,,--'-"-'-~
/ \1UWtv~""/ ð I,) 7 èð L. -S s>
CRA RESOLUTION NO. 05 -
,
A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY cOM:MuNfrr'
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RELATING TO COM:MUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT~ stfPERCEf)fN{J-REOLUTI8N ,
AMENDING THE GA TEW A Y TRIANGLE SITE IMPROVEMENT
GRANT PROGRAM; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2002-38 was adopted by the County Commission on July 30,
2002 creating a Site Improvement Grant for the Bayshofe Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area;
and
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) desires to use a portion of the
funds in the Redevelopment Trust Fund for a Site Improvement Grant to allow the use of tax
increment funding for projects within the redevelopment area; and
WHEREAS, after three years the Site Improvement Grant needs to be modified to improve
the application process, staff review procedures, and CRA approval process to better serve the
community; and
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency CRA desires to clearly specify
qualified residential and commercial project~ to provide eligible for Grant funding ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AS FOLLOWS THAT:
SECTION 1. Title. The grant program shall be known as the Site Improvement Grant
Program for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area.
SECTION 2. Adoption of the Site Improvement Grant Program as Amended. There is
hereby established.. -aA:d created, and adopted in accordance with the provisions of Collier County
Ordinance No. 2002-38, a new Site Improvement Grant proce&for the Bayshore Gateway Triangle
Redevelopment Area, and hereby adopted and attached hereto.
SECTION 3. Administration by CRA After the Board of County Commissioners allocate~
grant funding for the fiscal year, the CRA shall approve grant recipients, grant funding and grant
payment upon completion of work. The CRA delegates the administration of the grant program to
the Executive Director and the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Local Advisory Board to include, but
not be limited to, application process and review, recommendation of recipients, monitoring grant
progress, and recommending grant payment upon completion of work. The recipients of any grant
funds shall be required to execute an agreement in a form approved by the County Attorney's
Office for legal sufficiency and approved by the CRA.
. ~.__~,_',_~___~' 'o__"_^.·___··_,_,_<"M.'..._.....,_~~.__,__"_."'""""_O,,.·'w,"".-.,_..,_.--""...,._-.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any section or portion of this Resolution proves to be invalid or
unlawful, or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity, force, or effect
on any other section or part of this Resolution
SECTION 5. Effective Date: This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon
passage and adoption. SECTION 6. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote
this day of September 2005.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
BY:
DONNA FIALA, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency
2
Site Improvement Grant Program
B1ue LndgrLmt:: is ne\\ ((";1. B ue St\1ke!hf{\~~h ,. delè¡ed IC\1
General Provisions
The Collier County el1l ¡CRAj hrb created the Site
Improvement Grant Program to provide financial assistance to ','''\ ¡~t
,)\\ner-OCCl¡!)I~_d) ,and commercial establishments
B+hS hOl"e'(taft:',·, d\' 'jniJng!e
eHl'øHFih!e rdla8i!¡taH"n in the Bayshore/Gateway
Triangle Redevelopment Area by offering financial and technical assistance for site
improvements. ¡ n " H;b dFe h) Ft:".:::ehe
iHH}fOVemeH.¡(;ran14iìmb Improvements must be exterior improvements to the structure or
surrounding site, \)i ¡th:d"
!)t)'!thng. All improvements must meet the criteria listed below as well as the current
requirements of the land development code, building code" C,¡¡1S!II.:CI!un ¡'¡;"·C' lkii:;itS,
and any applicable zoning overlays. Improvements that remedy existing code enforcement
problems also qualify if combined with other site improvements.
The CRA is funded by Tax Increment Financing (TIF). TIF is a unique tool that CRA's can use
to leverage public funds and to promote private sector activity. The CRA will provide 50% of the
cost of improvements ".\ ..,':lid "y, ¡'¡UP',,' , up to a
maximum grant amount of $8,000. For example, a project that will cost $16,000 total
may receive a grant for up to '! $8,000, however a project that will cost a total of$7,000 will
only receive a grant for up to $3,500. Funding award will be evaluated based on the contribution
made by each applicant as well as extent of improvements. Commercial ¡j
projects must include a minimum of three (3) improvements and single family
residential projects must include a minimum of two (2) improvements
(described below). For example, a project that consists of only one type of improvement (new
sign only ,'rr1C\\ ¡';litH) will not qualify.
All work must be approved by the CRA Advisory Board, the CRA and any applicable county
departments that would normally review such improvements. All proposed work must be
approved before be2innißi~ anv work. Grant fundin2 is not retroactive. All work must be
completed within one year (if approval by CRA. Applicants are re~uired to request a meeting
with staff prior to submittal of application.
Eligibility
Grant funds are eligible to commercial structures (owner or tenant with a minimum lease term of
2 yearsrè:n;Ünìng) within the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area. Tenants must
have a current occupational license and owner authorization. Authorization form must be
submitted with application. All single ¡':¡n\ib (I': ¡(:s¡ccnce,'·
dh.dltngs are a\;;oeligible to receive Site Improvement Grant funds, !1,U;I ¡öidCIH
plopenYl> Ii9L
Grants funds may be used for the following improvements:
. Removal offalse façade, awnings, canopies, porches, signs or old entryway
. Porches, awnings, canopies
Sèplcmb.:r 8, 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA l\kcting ~
-
· Construction of new public entrances
· Signs
· Parking Lot Improvements. d r i \ ê \\ d ..;
· Fencing u.:hain not
· Painting (all colors must be approved)
· Window or door replacements or repairs tu
e-- . .\\' \if ,t>eih+hl
· Repointing of mortar joints for brick or stone fronts
· c¡-ior \\ repair, replacement or new installation
· Stucco work
· Landscaping installation and improvement '11
· New Roofing
·
!11art;;lial::, It' \\
¡ ì ~_~lI}r
· All work must be completed within one year of approval by CRA
Grant funds may not be used for:
· Working capital or administrative costs (payroll, rent, utilities, etc.)
.. s\\
<II
:,) I
e
@
· Interior renovations ic'\Cep! VvHHÌ\)\\. lh'''':':-' ':.'1
;
· Demolition only
· Loans or other capital support
· Work that will extend beyond one year ofapproml by CRA
dJeib \!
· \\
c': ~1 í1l~) ìell~(¡
PDT\ì\ di U ~!lC 1
crncnt
Project Evaluation
All projects will be evaluated based upon the following:
· Applicant's financial contribution (greater the applicant's contribution, more points
awarded)
· Number and extent of improvements (minimum 3 for commercial, 2 for residential)
· Ability to begin work immediately and ability to complete project within one year
· Remedy of code enforcement problems
<II Re~Üe+Hta ¡and 1.>'1 milt.:'! Ci d [
~\-\\··}t}- j:)ê- t~:ttnStÜ-e+:ed--S'et:.af'-{ff:e! >
S.:pt.:mber 8, 2005 Uayshor~ O'at"way Triangle CRA Mccling 5
Poínt Evaluation Fonn
A point system will be used h:> SIJffto evaluate projects, using the following table
(application must clearly indicate what project provides to get the points associated with that
item):
POINTS FORM
Points PGínt~
:\ \a!Îabk>,,, anted
ns or old ent
a
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
2
I
2
2
! 1 CJlt~~)_nb
Other Criteria
Applicant has funding and is prepared to begin permitting process and hiring 5
of qualified contractors immediately following CRA approval and complete
all work within one ear of a roval b CRA
j Improvements will allow applicant to remedy existing code enforcement 5
I problems
1 sl time Site Improvement Grant applicant (repeat applicants qualify for points I 5
if rant not awarded previously',,!' ';de) I
Requtres CRA contribution of25% or less of the total ro'ect cost 10
Req\:f¡¡e~ CRA contribution of _.1,0;, - 50% ·Yi-:~...:, of the total fo'ect cost 5
S-HfHfHai :)ubi¡\laì
HJL\t i!.!l\L
",(YIL I Any alterations in the project must be jJJ.,.~approved by the CRA to avoid revocation of funding. In the
event that the total funding request from all applicants exceeds the amount available for this grant cycle. funds will
be awarded at the final discretion of the CRA based on thc merits provided to the redevelopment area.
:.u '-:\Ijllllg
\:\¡>P¡.1~; s¡r¡t;tqT~·;·b.F;Jn
S<Jplcmbt.>r 8. 2005 Baysbore Galeway Triangle CRA Meetmg 6
PROCESS
Step I: Applicant Meets ~·ith Stqff
. Applicant must request a meeting with staff prior to submittal of application.
.
at pn
.>it\..Ò
c)'tep 2: Applicant 5;ubmittal
· Site Improvement Grant Application
· Project Initiation and Completion Form
· Owner Authorization Form (if '_ tenant is applicant) - requires notarization
· Two 8 x 10 color photos of the existing building façade ("before" photos)
· Sketch of proposed improvements
· Budget estimates for the improvements :Cd!11
·
\\ ¡-¡ltcn CSInna[c:':1
:.:un t"[ ~-1Cí Cìf:-:
Step 3: CRA Staff and Ad,'¡sory Board Review
· CRA staff reviews application and completes the Points Form, then places the
application on agenda of next Advisory Board meeting
· Advisory !!board checks project to make sure it meets all grant criteria and
Redevelopment Plan criteria
· Applicant is required to be present at the Advisory Board meeting to answer any
questions that may arise during the review or to provide additional material if requested
· If project meets all criteria, the Advisory Board makes a recommendation to CRA to
approve the application \\-dh a of ~;¡'Jnd¡ th~' HY .,·(ht" H'.ìÎU)
t:'\cf.'e-d-SS.. (i(¡li.
· Grant funding is limited with first priority given to projects »'ith higher points.
Step -I: CRA Review and Approval
· CRA staff prepares Site Improvement Grant Agreement for the CRA to reVIew and
approve
· Applicant signs Site Improvement Grant Agreement
· Application with Advisory Board recommendation and agreement both placed on CRA
agenda for review and approval; CRA reviews Advisory Board recommendation and
agreement during regular meeting and approves or denies project
Step 5: Permitting and Site Plan Improvement Proces,')
· If CRA approves project, applicant obtains all necessary permits and/or submits county
site improvement plan to Community Development & Environmental Services Division.
(Proof that all necessary permits were obtained, i.e. windows, doors, roofing and any
other structural improvements, will be required for payment of the Site Improvement
Grant. )
Step 6: Project Work
· Applicant applies for and receives permits, then begins work
September 8. 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangk CRA Meeting 7
Step 7: Project Completion and Submittal qf Prqject SummaJY Report
· Upon comp1etion of work and after all inspections have been completed to insure work
conforms to the work that was proposed, applicant submits:
o Project Summary Report, including description of completed improvements, two
!i:ì+2'e S.\ i ( color "after" photos, l,.i!tí'¡C1UI ill\\1itC., list of materials and
construction techniques used, list of architects and/or contractors and any
additional information specific to the project.
o Payment Request Form and all lii(I L'ri"i., receipts and/or canceled checks as proof
that all materials and contracted improvements have been paid
· The (-ìHiHt
thelì
\
ftfilllc-ïi/
·
""
1','\\ "', 'l¡'¡)rU\l';" prQll'_ct
'"
nìê:ilt
S'-l'tcmbcT 8.2005 HayshoTc Gat..:way Triangle CRA Meeting 8
,..~. ....__.~,.,._~"_~...,____"___"""'"....,.,_w,._,""""..,.,'''..____..__.______.'.
SITE IMPROVEMENT GRANT ApPLICATION
Section 1: Applicant Information
Owner Name:
Owner Address:
Site Address (if different from owner address):
Legal Description of Site:
Daytime Phone:
Alternate Phone:
!--
How long have you owned this property?:
How long is lease term ifleased?: (attach copy oflease)
Tenant Name (C ):
Tenant Daytime Phone:
Tenant Alternate Phone:
Number of Years in Business at Site Address:
Occupational License Number:
Other Tenant Names. if any:
First Time Site Improvement Grant Applicant?
YesJ No
If no. how many applications submitted?
Grant(s) awarded? Y es ~.. No
Seplembèr 8. 2005 Bayshon: Gateway Triangle CRA :>'keting I}
,_-......_"""~,___"_____...,.',,"'~'U_,,___.~__·,·_·'_'_n_ , + '" '^""_'_~'_"__
Section 2: Project Information
Existing Condition of Project (attach additional sheets if necessary):
ATTACH "BEFORE" PHOTOS (¡'~HÐf:-lrh--AT LEAST TWO fA-R-frl"; 8.\10 COLOR
PHOTOS, OTHERS MA Y BE ADDED TO ACCURATELY DESL1UBE THE SITE).
Outline Proposed Improvements in Detail (attach additional sheets if necessary):
List Materials to be Used and Construction Methods to be Utilized (i.e. red bricks.
wood panels. rVQLt:)J2\"~: etc.) (attach additional sheets if necessary):
A TTACH PHOTOCOPIES OF EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS IDENTIFYING AREAS TO BE
IMPROVED. ATTACH DRAWINGS OR SKETCH OF IMPROVEMENTS. ATTACH COLOR
SAMPLES FOR EACH IMPROVEMENT.
September 8, 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 10
Section 3: Project Cost Information
Estimated Project Cost:
. -1 I! r 1 '( ) }{A' l {') . { '( . j l.l r/ ). .¡ ("( \,,""/
¡, '\ J t"' ~ :,' ~ /
¡.¡ rn..\ 1.\//\/1 /!.\ (Il,' (ill i ! \"
¡ (',i-i/./) /'(j/ ii· 1 :'j:'//{ -if:
\
'.
Estimated Request tTom CRA
(up to 500/0 of the total project cost, up to,
but not exceeding $8,000.)
COPIES OF ALL RECEIPTS A1VD/OR C4.NCELED CHEl..-ì(}'¡ WILL REQUIRED UPON PROJECT
COMPLETION AS PROOF THAT ALL MATERl4.LS AN/) CONTRACTE/) IMPROVEMENTS
HAVE BEEN PAID. NO REIMBURSEMENT WILL BE MADE BY THE CRA UNTIL ALL
RELEIPTS AND/OR CANCELLED CHECKS HA VE BEEN RECEIVED AND VERIFIED.
Note: The CRA will reimburse on~v IfLI ¡ 50% of the total project cost, up to, but not exceeding a
maximum amount (!! ' $8,000 upon completion (if the pN?ject and suhmiual (?lthe Payment
Request Form.
FORCRA USE ONLY
Total Estimated Project Cost:
Request from CRA:
Percentage of Total:
Sc:ptc:mlkr K 2005 Hayshore Gatewa\" Triangl.: CRA \[eding II
Section 4: Project Forms
All applicable forms must be completed.
Forms to include with application:
1. Project Initiation and Completion FonD
2. Owner Authorization Fonn (if(;ºmll).~IJ::.Etttenant is applicant) - requires
notarization
Form to complete and have approved by CRA prior to start of project:
1. Site Improvement Grant Agreement (provided by staff after Advisory Board
recommendation and prior to CRA review and approval of grant application)
Forms to submit following project completion:
1. Project Summary Report Fonn
2. Payment Request Form - - requires notarization
Scplemb.:r 8. 200S Bayshor..: Gateway Triangle CRA Mee\Ìng 12
Project Initiation and Completion Form
(to be submitted with Site Improvement Grant Application)
I, , owner/tenant of the property located
at ' have the funding and
capability necessary to begin the site improvements listed under Section 2 of the
completed site improvement grant application and have the ability to complete all
improvements within one year of the approval of the site improvement grant by the
Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency.
Signature of Owner /T enant (.(q.l1J ¡1JÇ:¡\~Ü.LLQl1l,:j
Date
Signature of Owner/Tenant L~ oUHILçJ~\aLtL\1bJ
(if jointly owned or leased)
Date
Signature of Owner/T enant L~-_QJnn ìS;I ~E!L¡)Llb)
(if jointly owned or leased)
Date
Scptcmlx."r 8, 2005 Bayshorc Gateway Triangle CRA :>'kcting 13
Owner Authorization Form
(to be submitted with Site Improvement Grant Application, if _(,.~,.~11ìELÇI\J'Ütenant is
applicant)
1, , owner of the property located
at , understand
that , who has a
valid lease for the above listed property uJ;!LJ:\~_.Q_::I,~~jLiJ~Y()mLJLlL:_Ü;!J.r.;, and
authorize said tenant to complete the site improvements listed under Section 2 of
the completed site improvement grant application and to request matching funds
from the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency.
Signature of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
(if jointly owned)
Date
Signature of Owner
(if jointly owned)
Date
STATE OF:
COUNTY OF:
The foregoing Owner Authorization Form was executed before me this
,200_ by
owner of the property located at
is personally known by me
OR
who has produced ____
day of
, who:
as proof of identity.
Affix notarial seal
Notary Public (Signature)
Print Name of Notary Public
Commission No:
My Commission expires:
S..:pt..:mlx-r tt 2005 Bayshore Gateway TriangJ..: CRA. \kcting l--l
Project Summary Report Form
(Submit after project completion)
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Describe Condition of Project:
ATTACH "AFTER" PHOTOS (INCLUDING AT LEAST 1WO I::+-I-«:T/~ !~.\"J(LCOLOR PHOTOS,
OTHERS MA Y BE ADDED TO ACCURATEL Y DESCRIBE THE SITE IMPROVEMENTS).
List Materials and Construction Methods used~ especially if unique methods were
necessary to preserve or enhance some aspects of the improved site (attach
additional sheets if necessary):
List Names and Contact Information for Architects and Contractors Involved to
Provide Proper Credit
Provide any other important information specific to the project. All proiects will
be listed in the annual project report of the CRA so details and noteworthy
information about the project is very critical.
&pl~mbcr 8. 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Mi....:tÎng J 5
" ~'."~'".'-'~"'-"'''''~'~-----''- -,. '. -
Payment Request Form (project costs)
(attach all receipts~Lll_\~~lÇÇ:.o~. and/or cancelled checks)
On , the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency
approved a portion of the following improvements (50% of the total up to "
$8 000) b fì d d hr lIS' I G P
, to e un e t ougn t Ie lte mprovement rant rogram:
Improvement Cost
I
i
I Total
I hereby confirm that all items lìsted above have been completed as per the Site
Improvement Grant application submitted to the CRA and authorized by the CRA.
Therefore, I am requesting the approved funding in the total amount of $ _
as approved by the CRA.
The foregoing Payment Request Form was executed before me this
200_ by
of the property located at
_ is personally known by me
OR
who has produced
Affix notarial seal
day of
, owner
, who:
as proof of identity.
Notary Public (Signature)
Print Name of Notary Public
Commission No:
My Commission expires:
September 8.2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangk CRA :\leeting 16
ITEM 6b - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO APPROVE A FOUR-WAY PARTNERSHIP TO FUND (25% EACH), CONSTRUCT
AND OPERATE A PUBLIC ACCESS PATHWAY FROM BAYSHORE DRIVE TO
SUGDEN PARK, AND RECOMMEND COLLIER COUNTY BCC ACCEPT AN EIGHT-
FOOT EASEMENT FROM THE BOTANICAL PLACE DEVELOPMENT
OBJECTIVE: To approve a four-way partnership to fund, construct and operate a public access
pathway from Bayshore Drive to Sugden Park, and recommend Collier County BCC accept an
eight-foot easement from the Botanical Place development, and approve expenditure of funds up
to 25% of the construction costs.
BACKGROUND: When the Botanical Place PUD was negotiated with Collier County, a Sugden
Park access was discussed; however it was not approved. The developer has redesigned the
proposed access, discussed the project with the CRA Advisory Board, MSTU Board and affected
County Divisions
CONSIDERATIONS: The CRA Local Advisory Board has reviewed the proposed public access
to Sugden Park and recommends approval of a cooperative venture between the CRA, Collier
County, Botanical Place development, and Bayshore MSTU to create a public access walkway
from Bayshore Drive to Sugden Park. The Developer has agreed to grant an 8-foot wide
easement and pay 25% of the construction costs. The CRA Advisory Board agrees to support a
25% cost-share to fund the construction of the access, and has discussed with the MSTU Board
an equal share of 25%.
FISCAL IMP ACT: The CRA Advisory Board has determined that the TIF Trust Fund has
adequate reserves to contract for the construction when approved by the CRA Board.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County, including the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, that may consider alternative land
use plans, modifications to development standards, and incentives to encourage redevelopment.
RECOMMENDATION: CRA Board approve expenditure of CRA funds not to exceed 25% of
construction costs of the walkway, recommend to the BCC to accept the 8-foot public access
easement and authorize a County 25% cost-share, and direct the CRA Executive Director
monitor and report progress.
SUBMITTED BY: DAVID JACKSON
DATE:
REVElWED BY: CRA ADVISORY BORD
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
Scpt...-rnb..:r 8. 2005 Bayshorc Gal.:way Triangk CRA ~1~lÍng
SUGDEN PARK PUBLIC ACCESS
Sepkmber 8.2005 Hayshore Gateway Triangle CRA !\leeÜng 2
:Ä,·,·;:-:":--'~-:_._ --~-,,_."" -~-::f--"':'-""",.
..',.' j I. ," . 'j 0 _ ....,..~., .' '.J. ."
".
ì
Communities within walking distance
,~
I",
(
S<:pt<:mbcr 8. 2005 Bayshure Gate"ay Triangle CRA \I.:ding
3
NAPLES BOTANICAL PLACE CONDOMINIUMS BOARDWALK
BUDGET PRICING
Revised: 9/8/05
Budget
1 General Conditions: $25,572
2 Survey and Layout: $2,000
3 Asphalt Walk: $63,348
4 Boardwalk: $93,000
5 Lighting: $0
6 Liability Insurance $1,104
7 Fee: $20,558
Grand Total: $205,582
**** BUDGET IS +/- 10 % ****
ITEM 7a - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMEND THE CRA BOARD APPROVE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO
ADVERTISE AN RFP TO PERFORM A CORRIDOR (TRANSPORTATION AND
PARKING) STUDY FOR BA YSHORE AND SHADOW LA WN DRIVES, AND
CONSIDER WHETHER TO TEAM THE EFFORT WITH COLLIER COUNTY
TRANSPORT A TION DIVISION
OBJECTIVE: To approve the CRA advertising, via an RFP, for a consultant to study the
Bayshore-Shadowlawn Drives corridor for the traffic impacts tTom future development and
detennine best locations for future surface parking lots or mini-parking garages.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Bayshore MSTU has been extremely successful with the property
tax-funded beautification program along Bayshore Drive, and the CRA has successfully brought
economic activity and developmental focus to the area. With these successes comes growth and
change to the area. The worst kind of growth is unplanned growth, because it brings unexpected
results through the expansion of public infrastructure (roads, turn lanes, median cuts, and utilities
installation).
Today Collier County Transportation Division development controls are removing hundreds of
thousands of dollars of taxpayers MSTU beautification to meet increases in population and the
associated vehicular traffic. Some groups are asking for traffic lights or stop signs, and some
want Bayshore widened. The CRA cannot afford to let Transportation Division's mandates on
future development destroy what is bringing people to the Bayshore CRA area today. Soon it
will be gone and the neighborhood street will become a high capacity automobile mover instead
ofpedestrian-fTiendly commercial and residential district as desired by the local community.
Economically speaking, commercial growth cannot occur unless parking requirements are met,
and there aren't sufficient public parking sites near the existing or desired future commercial
centers. Before the CRA can acquire land for public surface lots or future mini-parking garages,
data must be collected as to the best locations to position parking facilities to support economic
growth.
FISCAL IMPACT: The CRA will fund the consultant's RFP contract for work for Bayshore and
Shadowlawn Drives or the CRA's portion of a contract if a joint project with Collier County
transportation Division
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County, including the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, that may consider alternative land
use plans, modifications to development standards, and incentives to encourage redevelopment.
RECOMMEND A nON: CRA Board authorize the Executive Director to advertise an RFP to
commission a corridor study of Bayshore-Shadowlawn corridor to include traffic counts (peak
periods), recommendations to widen or narrow Bayshore-Shadowlawn Drives, on-street I off-
Se:pt~mber 8. 2005 ßayshon: Gale:way Triangle: CRA M~ting
-. <-,._'"...".,.-..",."'...._"~..".-..~,"~-"--,~<,--,,.,--"-,_...,_..._,~"'~.~._"----_..-
street parking options, traffic control systems (lights, stop signs, calming devices), curb cuts
analysis and future parking site/garage locations, and direct the Executive Director to return with
ranking of consultant firms for CRA Board approval.
SUBMITTED BY:
DAVID JACKSON
DATE:
REVEIWED BY: CRA ADVISORY BOARD DATE:
- -
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
&:pt..:mber 8. 2005 Bayshor..: cr,l!""ay Triangle CR.\ ~1e.:ting 2
SA YSHORE & SHADOWLAWN DRIVE
CORRIDOR AND PARKING STUDY
Increasing Traffic
· Growth Driven
· Residential
· Sable Bay PUD (1999)
· Botanical Place PUD (218)
· Cirrus Pointe PUD (108)
· Bayshore Apts PUD (400)
· Fisherman's Reef PUD (70)
· Commercial
Throughway or Neighborhood Street?
· Traffic Calming?
· Traffic Lights?
· Stop Signs?
· 4-Lane?
· 2-Lane?
· Turn Lanes I Decel Lanes
· Loss Of Greenscape
Commercial Parking for Growth
· On Side Streets?
· Garaaes?
Sèptember 8. 2005 Bayshore Gatewav Triangle CR..\ Meeting 3
-
Shadowlawn Drive Improvement
i, 1",-1 UIt: :l-ª-It ' 111t ." fflt! ,It !! Ult .,,- i
, .. --!.... ... " ... \,..,\ 1-- .. ,
_I.. ; ,-' '-; !¡ _ 1_'
~ ~ j,,- ~-~-~¡. ~ ~
.RIIIØIr
A...."'r·...AI"*'*'... tM
_'_'____'___'__"W _.__._.___.,__..____.,__.___.."._,____...__._.~~ ._ __..____._.___~._.______._.__..
I
I
I
I
k.,."(>,
I ,\~
I .
I
I
~t
~I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~~\
Þ"';¡~'f I
. I
I
I
I ~::'=::.:
Ii
I
-
¥ !
',' ¡¡
SIuIdo....¡1 Ddn: RuIdwttIIII SUIxIIatdc;t
Septemœr 8. 2005 Bayshore Galewa\' Triangle CR.'. Meeting 4
e
!}. Ü
íf 1Ì
Sidewalk with
Special
Paving
Design
<9>
~ ~ Û U
I
~
~
.-......:...-
--Two Traffic
Lanes (12 it
wide)
/r~-
/
/
~
!
I
i
¡
\
1f ~~
Landscaped
Greenway
L~iID~i¡@UíJ@l.?@ I
'--"
(~iIDÜ®W9 &l;:~! iJU'Q~ùùt:IDU®
Œ1®(ri]®\:O® 11®f?)f1ì..i'ù®ffi)ì1
®11lli1@)~~7
CÀlller County Commission
CÀllier County Planning
Department
¡LLUSTRATION iX-15
Bayshore Design
Option A:
Landscaping in
Current R/W
4 Lanes
;) Keeps 9xl$tlng alignment
,. New landscaping and sidewalks
Dehiod existing curb and gutter
. Inexpensive to build
r\f!
I , ~. ~..
-
-A>.17IPt8.,..~L...a.oI't.A!o¡"r"!1\."·~
.---...
--
...--
A
;....."......~ ~
~~
..---
~
--
"--~
::.m QrråIIII& ,......
---I
~wl..1
Special
Paving
Design
Landscaped
!slands with
On Street
?arking
Continuous
Landscape
Island
¡
,
,
-
(.~
.----,-~
¡
n
if
~
\~
.~
Existing Curb
& Gutter
Landscape
Islands
One Traffic
Lane {i4 ft
/~jde)
J~
¡"
I
landscaped
Greenway
¡~?~}\V/~rh)enrJJ{f'\ /1
r.,,:~' -..... '_7 .
C~iÎ1Ü(~\"7d&JW UffOiIDITi)(£10@
...J '_
lnl@(g]&F!7@n('2¡[0rriTù@rm~~
:0nlllK9)~17
Collier County Commission
Collier County Planning
Department
ILLUSTRATION 1;>(15
Bayshore Design
Option B:
On Street Parking /
Greenway
?Ia
-'- 1.- nes
1) Keeps ðXisting curbllne
" "Islands" for landscaping on inside
,raffle lanes
3 Gost moderate. faw modlfcatlons if
-3ny (0 drainage ~ystem.
.--
, ~r- 1
ß
--
.,,"tDfRI ... rx.N3 ¡OI~" ,Io ER:i.. :,"';
~o.I8Nc..r..u....
--
A
;~......~~
--
......--
-
.---
~_<enu......
~~~
Sidewall< with ,
Special
Paving
Design
Landscaped
Islands with
On Street
Parking
2 lanes No
On Street
Parking
.~,6J
~-~
'l~ . Existing Curb
,t· & Gutter
I
I
I
. !
;
----1
t
¡
i
¡
I
'k,
-,'
~
/_.r_:--.,
Landscape
Islands
~-'---'ðne Trafflc
Lane (14 ft
wide:.
Landscaped
Greenway
'.
0:, >
\.)'j)'
~ J
t t
.-- ,
(. <
! I
i. eRI
@&J~7~lh}(º)[}\?;) /
:t~<IDi1®\~\\jOO\1:! Wr¡Ü@Uù®ß@
1"3)""'""]""',"\<,1.<" U"',- r;::m'Y;:;'I~'lf}
,n),\ø\~l \.S:\~/'~ ;D.ìIP)tJ1JlJ\~u1j.j
"
®i1fl!J(ill~~7
Comer County Commission
Collier County Planning
Department
a...L~JSTRAT{ON ìX~1·r"
Bayshore Design
Option C:
Limited On Street
Parking I Greenway
2 Lanes and 4 Lanes
. i<eeps existing curbtlne
.) ,:;Ombinatlon of 2 lanes and 4
'...an8s of Traffic
'!slands' for landscaping on inside
,raffle lanes
"':osi moderate. few ;oodifcations if
"oy to ,1rainage system.
~~
;. :
6
......~.:<-E~ . ~ '!'Jo.'1n' :;.;._........~ .-...
'.~~~
--
t\
~~....,.~~
~~
4;.";\ft!"~u.y__
'.;~~
~...........~
~~ .......
-----~-._._. .--- -- ------ -----~_. --~-----_._--
-------_.--- -------------_._--.-
I~..·.·.·
~
I
~
!~
Landscaped ¡
Islands with On '
Street Parking
Sidewalk with
Special Paving
Design
.u.!J IJ·~
>0
~~/.
-------_._---~.
~ I
,~
ÍÌ lif
I
I
I
I
'- On Street
Parking
Landscape
Islands
Two Traffic
Lane (11 ft
wide each)
Landscaped
Greenway
_~_ ~____~___n.__ __~_
Œ3iIDW®I}o@[}y~ "
(0J<IDî1®WtiID~ 'lIcråtIDffi1@U@
[Æ®@J®W(~U(0[Y)UÙí)®ITDí1
®í1lli1(illW
CQlller County Commission
Collier County Planning
Department
iLLUSTRATION 1)(-18
Bayshore Design
Option D:
Parallel Parking /
Greenway
4 Lanes
". Rebuilds street alignment and
drainage system
. Median "islands" reduced from 16.5 ft
to 9.5 It
¡, On street parkJng
.J> l.artdscape islands
" Traffic lanes reduœd to 11ft width
Expensive
¡1r\ II
....
(J>.~."'~9".....k'WEJf:t.'¡-.:; 1\
==- &.l\
~. ~...........
--
---
--
~~~.
-~~........
BA YSHORE MSTU BEAUTIFICA TION REMOVAL
-""".,~~""
.,-
"::.,,"~
_:~~~
ITEM 7b -EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CRA BOARD APPROVE THE EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR TO ADVERTISE AN RFP FOR A CONSULTANT TO DESIGN AN URBAN
SECTION STREETSCAPE DESIGN FOR SHADOWLA WN DRIVE AND/OR
LINWOOD A VENUE
OBJECTIVE: To approve advertising, via an RFP, for a consultant (landscape architect-
engineer) to study and design the Shadowlawn Drive and Linwood Avenue streetscape into
urban section residential/neighborhood streets.
BACKGROUND: The Shadowlawn neighborhoods have been determined blighted by the CRA
Findings of Blight and Collier County Resolution No. 2000-82. The streets have a defective or
inadequate layout and contain unsafe public conditions. The street swales do not effectively
transport stormwater and residential neighborhoods experience flooding during significant rain
events. School children transiting to/from Shadowlawn Elementary Schoo] are exposed to
vehicular traffic and have to walk in the streets. There are neither residential sidewalks nor
pedestrian-scale safety lighting.
Collier County received a CDBG Grant to install sidewalks along Linwood Avenue; however a
City of Naples sewer force main was discovered connecting the Collier County Governmental
Complex and the Shadowlawn Elementary SchooL The CDBG Grant was returned and the
sidewalk never installed.
CONSIDERATIONS: As part of the Collier County's Gateway Triangle stormwater design
project, the CRA Advisory Board agreed to partner with the County Transportation (Stormwater)
Division to design and install streetscape features in the Gateway Triangle area to improve the
neighborhood streets.
Preliminary cost estimates to design and construct a streetscape design for Shadowlawn Drive
and Linwood Avenue has been completed by HDR Inc. (See following Table #1 and aerial).
Once the design is complete, the CRA will wait for the County stonnwater installation contract
to be bid prior to bidding the installation project.
FISCAL IMP ACT: The CRA Advisory Board has the funds to contract for this service and
install the design when approved by the CRA Board.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County, including the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, that may consider alternative land
use plans, modifications to development standards, and incentives to encourage redevelopment.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation that the CRA Board approve the Executive Director
to advertise an RFP for a consultant to design an urban section streetscape design for
September 8. 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA :vleeting
Shadowlawn Drive and/or Linwood Avenue, and return with a ranking of applicants for CRA
Board approval.
SUBMITTED BY: DAVID JACKSON
DATE:
REVElWED BY: CRA ADVISORY BOARD
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
September 8. 2005 Bayshore Galeway Triangle CRA J\'leeting 2
TABLE #1 COST ESTIMATES TO DESIGN AND INSTALL STREETSCAPE ON
SHADOWLAWN DRIVE & LINWOOD AVENUE
GATEWAY TRIANGLE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Preliminary Pre-Design Estimate of Probable Cost
3/1 612005
Street Est. Estimated ROADWAY LANDSCAPE & STREET CONSTRUCTION
Length Desig n Fee CONSTRUCTION IRRIGATION LIGHTING TOTAL
Commercial Drive 1,125 LF $ 47,000 $ 261,360 $ 85,800 $ 122,500 $ 469,660
Shadowlawn Drive 3,100 LF $ 129,400 $ 720,360 $ 236,300 $ 337,600 $ 1,294,260
Linwood Avenue 3,850 LF $ 161,600 $ 947,400 $ 249.500 $ 419,300 $ 1,616,200
EST. TOTAL
$ 338,000
$ 3,380,120
Gateway Triangle Area
CRA Streetscape RFQs
Shadowlawn Drive
· Streetscape
Design
Linwood Ave (West)
· Streetscape
Design
Issues:
· Stormwater Project
· City Sewer Line
· County Admin
· School Board
September 8, 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 3
SHADOWLAWN DRIVE TODAY
September 8.2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 4
---,-""---,p--~._.._---_._,_..,-..~.,.__._-,,.,_.-.----.~..__......
LINWOOD AVENUE TODAY
.~. . .
vr;:.2{' ,::",:"",,-
......'1..'. ;,~'.
-,: "', ii!r}
{..........l
/',. ., .....-'\
./< ,.
j .~,
~ > <o:f"'
Linwood Neighborhood with
Curb and Gutter
September 8, 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 5
ITEM 7c - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMEND THE CRA BOARD APPROVE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
TO ADVERTISE AN RFP FOR A CONSULTANT TO DESIGN AN URBAN
SECTION STREETSCAPE DESIGN FOR LAKEVIEW AND RIVERVIEW
DRIVES, AND APPROVE NEGOTIATING PRIVATE DEVELOPER
PARTICIPATION AND CONTRIBUTION TO THE PROJECT
OBJECTIVE: To approve advertising, via an RFP, for a consultant (landscape architect-
engineer) to study and design the Lakeview and Riverview Drives streetscape, and
partner with developers to improve the streets into safe and functional urban section
residential/neighborhood streets
BACKGROUND: A major residential development, the Antaramian Fisherman's Cove
PUD (at Windstar), the Haldeman Creek dredging spoil will deposited on that site and
heavy-duty trucks will be traveling the residential street hauling away spoil. As the
development ofthe buildings begins, more heavy-duty trucks will be traveling the street
delivering construction materials and hauling away debris. The 20 foot wide street will be
severely impacted from the abnormal heavy-duty truck traffic.
VK Development has purchased the Gulf Shores Marina facility on Bayshore Drive. The
facility will be redesigned and redeveloped into an improved dry boat storage and marina
facility for its clients and parent company. This development will impact both residential
streets, Lakeview and Riverview Drives, at Bayshore.
CONSIDERATIONS: As part of the Antaramian developer SDP, the Planning
Department will require the developer to install a sidewalk from Bayshore to the
development along Lakeview Drive; however nothing will be done to correct the street's
damage.
For the VK Development project, Riverview and Lakeview will be partially impacted by
the construction project.
By creating a four-way partnership (CRA, MSTU, two developers) these two
streets can be improved to address stormwater, safety, lighting, sidewalks, landscaping
and improve the Bayshore neighborhood streets. Both developers have tentatively agreed
to financially support the streetscape projects. (See following aerials).
FISCAL IMP ACT: The CRA Advisory Board has the funds to contract for this service
and install the design when approved by the CRA Board.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of
the Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for
specific areas within the County, including the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, that may
September 8, 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 1
consider alternative land use plans, modifications to development standards, and
incentives to encourage redevelopment.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend the CRA Board approve the Executive Director to
advertise an RFP for a consultant to design an urban section streetscape design for
Lakeview and RivefView Drives, establish a working partnership with the MSTU and two
developers, and return with the proposed agreement and a ranking of design applicants
for CRA Board approvaL
SUBMITTED BY:
DAVID JACKSON
DATE:
REVEIWED BY: CRA ADVISORY BOARD
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
September 8, 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 2
June 30, 2005
Lakeview and Riverview Drives: Streetscape Design Proposal
Location
Bayshore CRA will prepare streetscape design construction documents for the residential
street improvement of:
1. Lakeview Drive from Bayshore Drive to the apartment complex driveway
(approximately 1,056 feet in length) into an urban design street.
2. Riverview Drive from Bayshore Drive to the end of the cul-de-sac.
Services
Design services will include, planting design, irrigation design, hardscape design
(sidewalks, and crosswalks), and street lighting design within the 40' right-of-way.
Planting Design
Develop the planting plans details and specifications for landscaping the street. These
documents will show the location, type and size of materials.
Irrigation Design
Develop the irrigation plans details and specifications appropriate for the planting
material types. These documents will show the location, type and size of materials and
equipment needed to provide proper irrigation for the planting design.
Hardscape Design
Develop the hardscape plans, which may include specialty paving (concrete, brick or
asphalt pavers, stamped colored concrete or asphalt, etc.), for sidewalks and crosswalks
and design any non-regulatory signs or project graphics.
Street Lighting Design
Develop the street lighting plans, details and specifications that will include location,
fixture type, pole underground utilities and any special features such as banner arms.
Street Design
In coordination with the CRA, the County Transportation Department will design a wider
street with curb and gutter, and the design for contained or piped (no culverts) stormwater
flow and retention.
Proposed Project Partners are CRA, MSTU, County Transportation, VK Development
and Fisherman's Cove (Windstar) PUD.
CRA: Streetscape Design, Fees, sidewalks and crosswalks
MSTU: Plants, irrigation, light poles and underground electrical
Transportation: Road design
Developers: Survey, road paving (asphalt), curb & gutter
September S, 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 3
LAKEVIEW & RIVERVIEW DRIVES STREETSCAPE
ANT ARAMIAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP
VK DEVELOPMENT
SA YSHORE CRA
SA YSHORE MSTU
COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY
Improvements :
Curb, Gutter, Asphalt
... Trees, Grates, Irrigation
Decorator Lamp Posts
. Underground Electricity l'
Jo'
Sidewalks q, .
Design Fees £
'"
U
.JJ
- - 1;,
,., ..__...._"'~ ...",..,~.... 1II"WiII ~
September 8.2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 4
Lakeview Drive Residential: Existing Development
..;
", :?('. ,,\ /'j.!'[/~'''' .. '>Ò ,ri t~
~'; ~.;¡'. .¡t~¡r1(' ^"'!~~'~~t:.'~ *. ~ô
fIf···~·· IJJ' ~~, ." j · ~ ~ .
.. 1 ~ '.' ~ ; ~·,..,.i,
~ ..,.. . ·.{":re.' -\ ~,
~ 4
"1, ~~ ' ·r., .
>¢.~~.":,, '
"~...'t'<-...~' ;
t''i}.w:' rr.;"~;~". .... '. 1.,,;. <1t
. I .." ·f·' " ~'\....~- .. .~
,p" J "" ~. ':.. ',. .-;:' ,·....,:1. ,.L1'!.: ,.
., I>,. ." _ .. . :C":' . -'>- .
~\ rL 11,.. .... . -." ¡,.:::.I .-_.:::,.~. ,,!
.. ,-0 ~.." ,. .,' -~~._. . .... '-.
'___"4/¡ý',~ ~_ _:~ ....._-- _",,-J ' '. '"1 , ';
, 4' , "'Í.('';:---=-~./ J ....,..
--. ..1-........ _ .'
. ( ( . ¡~l :-;7¡;t "-r"">-
~, ""./ ~//
'),..'~"".~'..".,....rk"':'.,.,..".,...........'....,.,..~........
~..........('..'i:"'.....
~: - :"~;i~j~'" "
.~ ~- . '.,;
?~~:_- r,' %tt:\,' ,::: ~ ~;ø' .~ ": ::~
,,':': >; !!'~':,.,;:":." ..... .::':<,
Lakeview Neighborhood with Curb and Gutter
September 8. 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 5
ITEM 7d - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CRA BOARD CONSIDER RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO BCC OF BAYSHORE
AND GATEWAY OVERLAY OPTIONS FOR FAST-TRACK OPT-IN REZONING FOR
MIXED-USE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, DIVISION-LEVEL ADMINISTRATIVE
DEVIATIONS OF COUNTY CODE FOR STRESSED PROPERTIES, AND PROVIDE
GUIDANCE TO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
OBJECTIVE: To receive guidance and approval from the CRA on proposed Bayshore and
Gateway Overlay provisions to facilitate economic development, provide incentives for mixed-
use redevelopment, and allow streamlined approval of Code deviations for stressed CRA
properties at the lowest level of the permitting process.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Comprehensive Plan directs the writing of the Bayshore/Gateway
Triangle Redevelopment Zoning Overlay to allow for additional neighborhood commercial uses
and higher residential densities that will promote the assembly of commercial uses and higher
residential densities that will promote the assembly of property or joint ventures between
property owners.
The CRA was created to promote redevelopment by providing incentives that will encourage the
private sector to invest in the urban area. As such, the Advisory Board and consultant, HDR,
Inc., have submitted the Bayshore Overlay Amendment #3, and the initial Gateway Triangle
Overlay to the County for review through the 2005 LDC Amendment Cycle II. In these
submission there exists proposed "redevelopment incentive" language to allow for a fast-track
type ofre-zoning option for property owners to administratively opt-in to the Mixed-Use or
Neighborhood Commercial zoning at the time of submission of their SDP/PUD. This option
allows the property owner to change the zoning/use to what the BCC has already reviewed and
approved (Mixed-Use - through the Overlay) and forever in perpetuity give up the existing
underlying zoning/land use.
Also there is proposed language to allow for Administrative Code Deviations at the CDES
Department Head level and Administrator's level for parking and landscaping requirements.
These administrative deviations would be allowed for properties that redevelopment of existing
structures on odd shaped lots, parcels that have been reduced by 'takings', or parcels that have
insufficient square footage to meet 2005 Codes.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County, including the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, that may consider alternative land
use plans, modifications to development standards, and incentives to encourage redevelopment.
RECOMMENDATION: CRA Board discuss:
1. Proposed Overlay language,
2. Developer/redeveloper Overlay incentive options to invest in CRA area,
September 8, 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 1
3. Consider recommending approval to BCC of Bay shore and Gateway Overlay options
for fast-track (administrative level) opt-in rezoning for mixed-use redevelopment
projects that comply with already approved Overlay mixed-use rezoning,
4. Division-level administrative deviations of County Code for stressed properties, and
5. Provide guidance to Executive Director.
SUBMITTED BY: DAVID JACKSON
DATE:
REVEIWED BY: CRA ADVISORY BOARD
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
-" ~-------~._-
___-."'_ _ .._=4-'.. .;....-::-.~-.....-
-.. ..,;: ....... ~ i. ..". ~.. ~~.~
..~ "'¡"~1i' ~~
. $."'.'. ........ if·· ".'... "."... I:;k, .
ç.~,.. ..', '1:1. \.
;.' ~~' '. .'~ t "
..~ . .
-.. ~ .
.)
'.
""'~~'~~- ,. 'i '1 :~" ;'~~'"
September 8. 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 2
PROPOSED OVERLAY INCENTIVE LANGUAGE TO SELECT MIXED-USE ZONING
1. Mixed Use Overlay Subdistrict
A. Mixed Use Subdistrict (GTMUD-MXD). The purpose and intent of this Subdistrict is to
provide an option to current and future property owners by encouraging a mixture of
medium intense commercial and residential uses on those parcels with frontage on US 41,
Davis Boulevard, and Airport Pulling Road. Included also is the "triangle" formed by US
41 on the South, Davis Boulevard on the North and Pine Street to the East.
Developments will be pedestrian-oriented and reflect building patterns and facade
articulation of traditional neighborhood design. The current zoned commercial property
within the Mixed Use Subdistrict will remain under current LDC commercial regulations
(except for certain site development standards as stated in Chapter 4 Site Development
Standards) until the property owner decides to opt into (an administrative rezoning
process) the GIMUD-MXD Subdistrict, which allows residential and commercial (C-1
through C-3) uses if part of a mixed development. Any property in the GTMUD
Subdistrict for which the underlying zoning is RMF-6 is allowed to have commercial
uses only if it is part of a mixed use development.
Q Q1Ï QD_ªL¡\) a. t 11 rçl) Lthe.. [\1 ¡ ;.; cd ... t j sr.. Sub d 1St r:çt j on ¡ nglc" <lngQ \^dlçr ~.. in. (ìªJç~.ª..YuLç.iteyçlQj¿m~m
Qv:.çܪ.Y.eii :;;tIÍçt .ªre~ne()l!raged tQciç,çloV .()[!edeYt'lt)j)t heir .prC)perl)'. !n.çQl}f()!"mªJ}çç\NitbJh~
QvÇIJ'¡.YJ, j:xçdU~c..Suþciistrict . ('oI1Jmerciallal1d()\vner~.\vith!n the (Jate\vay. QverJ(jy.'.I\Ji:XÇcll)~ç
Sllbcii!';tLÍC:Lªrel}()t5llb.lÇÇt It) or.. requirçd ..to. pªrtlc imitt:'. in an y of .[t sproYls i()ns,.t?xççp.t..t~)["ççr1ªin
[)ç~igt1S.tªnclªrds_ªsstªted in (,haptçr~ of this LPCunless thatl'1!1(iO\vnt:'L~It:'çts.t()si~)5Q~.A
lafl(JQ\vn~r' sciçeisí~}nIQ usethef\li xçd UseS u bdìst ricte! assi fj cation!!1u stbemªdçj¡J\vriÜng,
u:il1.<llly.ªtJl1çJimt?.Qt'site pJªrL5wbmiss!ç)[1 . The dQClII11C'ntSfllll:-;t.IJe r~CQrd~~(L bYt!1e.<w.pljs.:4mjn
CQJliçr.CQllntY~5.(2nl~iªL reqJrds,and nlUS[ ªcknoy"ledge .1 hat IhecIcçisipl1.!tJdeyçIQjJ/redcvçlQp
wldJ;~Lthç ~h:XÇclJ·ist:'Sllþdi.striet run::; with thelan.cLi 11. perpellril Y)O JQng (IS tllç.pmpçnYlltiliz:~::-;
theMi:x~'d.UseuSllbdjsJrict's regulations to legitimileíts existÌILi!. plan of.~k\/elºprnçIlL
CQl1}pliMlceyvithtll.(Jse reg111au()ns \\111. contÎUlIc to berçqUlred
(Ii LmÜ.\.ici.!ml..IªncIm\i11çr:i 11JªSí,:hQQsç tl.Jf()lIQ\vc\ÎsliOgC()ILi.çr rºl1I1JyçQI1U!lçrciªJ
z:ºn!I1.g.Içg~IJªJiQ lS ¡Çtªle.c1JQ llse::; y,hGluht0Q!! ¡Jei QL rçÞtÚlcl,. .. QLªt ::-;Qlç}yJhç.i LQPtimL.
tJ1GY mªy.e ççt.t()cie.\çJQPuor rçdçyeIop.llnder the. appJlçablç. 1111 xeg tl~çpm,'i::;ioJ1:-;9f
t hisQY ç¡J.<lygi::-;trict
(2) 1{ª-Jìmpçrt'y_QWIJe.LÇ.bºQSÇ~ tlujçyçlop/n.:Qe.vç hnÜnçQl1lpI e.J('çºl}l~ìIIJJa nce~ithJhç
çÚ~lÏD.gJ.!I1d.eI¡si 1g1ª mix\.) n illgL[t:'g~i 14 tÎQIJ::-;ªI2PJiç ª.þle. t () thelliNer1yiQg?:Qn!ng
Qi.~t¡jÇL__Ç()IDPh4nçç\vjlbthe }v11."cQ.lsç Subc1i5trict' s.Z()ning regltl4tiQOS i~ !1J)J
rçcmìrçg, e\.cçpt fqrcerta in [)ç~ign S laJ1liªrci~ fOll!1d in Chapt er A. Qft\1 í,5L"I:lÇ'
( 3) Sl1c2l11Q_ª.1ªJJQQ\'.nG)"c hQtJ~ç JQavailb 1 m ::-;çl[()Uhç rn()QjJjÇQ..IªIlQ.Qç-"glill2JI!~n.t
reg!!lªtÍ!.1l1sQ[ thçNI i\t:'ei t':;ç S l1bQ.!strjçt, t1lenç9IJmliª!1çç. \..ithªJJªpjÚi~-ªhJç..p.9I1iQm
QLtbçJY1ixçd ..II:sçSllþc1 istricL\\i H. be .!1l<tnQ¡1ll)T)E'L t hal nropertyJiQ\vÇ.vÇL ()!1.Çç_'l
lª-ncJQ~Yn(è'I·t?JçÇl s t he 1\1 i,\çd Lise S qbdi !';tricL zO[1i pg.desjgnªt ion <I!ld reguJªtÎQI1SDl1.ª
P.fl[li~l1.larJìJ!Ic:ç¡, thçt1.1hÇ prQlìeny.is undçr.th4t.SubdistÖct.lf1 pçrpetllitY.(U1~ieann~Qt
rçYt:'nlmc:kJ(). thel)rçv i()lIS¿Qrl ing .(j 1St ricl
September 8, 2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting
"
-'
ADMINISTRATIVE DEVIATIONS IN CRA OVERLAYS
PROPOSED IN OVERLAYS:
Administrativelv.ÂQQ.foved Parking Oeviations
Al...lb~_r~çºlJmJ.~llciªÜºI}QLtbçCß/\.J,()cal. {~(J 'visors ..B()ªn:L.. Jh~ .Ç·()llnlY·~.lºl1i.m~...ltnQ.L<m.ci
12~yel().RJlleJ1J.R~'vit:'\v !)ireclor çªnacIm l.niS1mtl\t:'l.y approvereci~,çeci.parkíng. [~mlir:~Jl1(:'nl.~tº-ª
rrlªxi.mllmºL;~o.o....Jhìs ...rç(lllctionc:.an.apply \vhçn ...tl1e.. sitÇCQ!lC!ÜiQI1S. cJ().HQLéllLQ\>'¡" Jl1[...th.e
re.mtirf3..cl.pªrkÌJ1Q lQ þephssiçél11y t~asiÞIe...J·he z.oningQireçto[' s dt.~çi~î()nçªn þ~a'pp~ªI~.ciJQJl~
AdJllini~tral()r()C Ç'omnJunity .Developrncnt.<¡nd .Fn\irQrl!lìgrlta1. .Servlcesl)iyi~iQI1....ªnçl_bi~
cl(:'çi~i Ql1jS Jina I.
PROPOSED IN OVERLAYS:
AdministrativçJ.y Approved Parking Deviations
l\ t.JI1t:'I..e.ç ()llllll~ 11Qª tiQI1 . ()[ ills:.. C.ß i),L ºçé~I.. 1\ Q'vi ~()rY..Jlºªrd.>. tilt. h~CÇllJlllY' ~ZQni!lg.-ªJ1QJ· a ilQ
[)çYÇ.!QPJ11 (:'nl.... RçyjçY'vJ)ireçtm Célnªciln ill i 5t rati,- ely ªppr<)\~it H 1I n't:.r~I.ypej, \AliJh ª_~I,,_{ 9J.Jl)QI
\\iªILQf_.fençg. TI1~..Z:()nIIlg!)ireçtor'sdt;çision ..cªn..þe._ém.p~ªkdto ..thçj\d.mÍJJÍ~tmlºLºf
CQl]1J!lll!Üt.yQGy~lQrH11G!1J .~lJld. Env·ironmental.Senices Di v l:-,i()!1 ..a mihis d~c.i~í()Jlj~. finªI.
September 8,2005 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Meeting 4
ITEM 7e - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CASE STUDY: TO HEAR COMMENTS FROM THE REDEVELOPMENT TEAM OF
THE THALHEIMER BUILDING (SONA LOUNGE) ON US41 IN GATEWAY
TRIANGLE MINI-TRIANGLE AND CRA BOARD CONSIDER ADVISORY BOARD
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LDC DEVIATIONS TO FACILITATE THE PROJECT
OBJECTIVE: For the CRA Board to hear an actual case where a redevelopment team is having
difficulty meeting County LDC requirements when applied to a property with and existing
building.
CONSIDERATIONS: The CRA's responsibility is to encourage redevelopment through
incentives, TIF reinvestment, and other governmental actions that facilitates economic activity or
creates and economic stimulus that encourages the private sector to invest and develop. Those
governmental actions may even include writing a separate Code (an overlay) that reduces
development requirements, streamlines the permitting process and provide developmental
incentives to achieve the desire economic activity and benefit.
The Comprehensive Plan directed a zoning Overlay be developed to implement mixed-use
zoning and define incentives for private investors to develop/redevelop within the CRA
boundaries. The Gateway Triangle Overlay currently in the 2005 LDC Amendment Cycle II
contains proposed language to facilitate redevelopment and provides for incentives for private
redevelopment activities.
Within the CRA there are many properties that are non-conforming due to various factors where
they do not meet Collier LDC requirements or could not meet Code if redeveloped; such as
irregular parcel layout before current codes, irregular lot shape with less than below allowable
square footage rrom 'takings', insufficient highway frontage, inadequate land to accommodate
building square footage parking requirements, faulty parcel layout that doesn't allow required
stormwater retention, parking and/or landscaping on the site.
The Thalheimer project is a perfect example. To NOT grant deviations will guarantee that this
site will not be redeveloped without a complete demolition and rebuild, and very wen may mean
that the site remains 'as is' for another 10 years. That action will send a sure message to
prospective private investors to stay away from the CRA area.
FISCAL IMPACT: The CRA Trust Fund will not receive any TIF differential until this property
is redeveloped. Increased TIF is reinvested in public infrastructure.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County, including the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, that may consider alternative land
use plans, modifications to development standards, and incentives to encourage redevelopment.
RECOMMENDATION: CRA Board hear comments and make recommendations to the BCC as
determined by the Board.
Seph:moor 8. 2005 Bayshorc Gateway Triangle CRA Meeling
SUBMITTED BY : DAVID JACKSON
REVEIWED BY: CRA ADVISORY BOARD
APPROVED BY:
r 1""'--
,
¡
,¡
t
.~
r
~
i
1
,
,".1,,__.
.,".__,=.,.___..,,~~_~.=or.~.'''''<__'.'~''''-''-'C'-. '~'-'r-'~... T-~..,;..i~..·'I·l·
" "."" . . I 1 ,"1'1, ¡.I ¡. r I . ~! r I jl\
. I 1':" I.,;
. . '~~'--':-j. . I . ~ : .",~¡' l.~f~!.:', ,'¡' f \
+-.'\' .u :;-··I.~t""~''''r; ;." i1'.," ".
.J' Ij c¡ \ ¡ '1 f !: 'I ' ,
ì ..L_,_.LJ.. ...1..L.1
OA~ BOlUVARD (SA 84)
.=,..~"{i...,"",-""", ~.~
'"
"""-
""
"
,
'" .
~..:.. ~ì~,
~! ~
\ . '1
l \ '
~ 1:~]~~_:'~~Lr.· .',:,
... '. ,
1
1
3
4
1.
DATE:
I
I
I
",
I
.....
Scptcm!x:r 8. 2005 Bayshon: Gateway Triangle CR.·\ \keting 2
DATE:
DATE:
i:':
'$.",
.¡! ····t·· I ."T I. r;:T1 I
. 33J-/;·..,k,' .···
ì~J! nJ1Jl'l ~j I'! rt~r
:;:: , ,- j
.., -";C'm
. ....::-... I C-ð ' :'.'
,"-' ; I;
...-. , 411 I
~-I,,- ¡ , ';-f1f} UJr1
~:~,~","",.,. ';iJF,.·.:.i~,~i ~L Ht
1,-,:: II ¡1 '.. '
. I Thalheimer Project
I
/
~ " ""'1
¡': 1"\,;,~~_,~~~
" ~ ~"',
[;;3 ~ "Þ'it ,0:4- //
,. . I
'2 / "!-\' "" /
~ 11 / '" "'" /
15 /to 1 .(
1 /. . '"
, Color CodJ
~ R J . J........
___00.
_n._
~-
-.t
00
0:::
(/)
"-.../
It) .... - ilr
N " I- - -r\.
.... N n 0
~ ;;¡: ...J n ~
- cr Ù
::;: ~ lLJ_ _~
~ - -- -~~~"?'
¡;;¡ ~ - -- UI
..- N -::L - -- -~ X 1<) .
0
¿,,¡ - :1.
N ~ (Q ~ =1< I- ió
u ~ >- ~
'" .~- 1:::0
y a 1=
- .N en 0 ;:-
Ñ. ~- It) (Q 0
.n ...... NI'\ U " 3: c," ,
N. -¡..;; ~<)-~
~ N :!í[ ~. ,
n ,;;:¡ ~- ~ ....1 ,
1'1 . '" !;!. ~
- ~"::(' en
N N n .£i - , 0'
n n ....
~ -,
3^lèlO lVI~èl3ViViO~ ~"f' , - ,
~~ ~ I- ,,"f'A M ~(~
~ ~~ ~ 0 ..".~....
... ~ ~ <w
~ it: ~ ~ ~
/- n I -
en "\ ~ f--
.... - ~ ..". It) N
~ ~
110 / :;¡: I
.... nü
£ ~ N "J"J). IC:::: ....1 -f~1 -
~UI ~ n ~~<2 ~ ..".
..- :,. - - -"
0) It)
It) ¡(~ <8> ~ n
..- f--
" ~~ ~.¿S 110
~ l!&- n CD
..-
n ..-ß~ r<x " l-
n
- ,... .... N~ r--
N .... /- ~~ N M.... -~- I-
,.... tti ~ N~J~ or:(
- 110
:: B ~ <p~~ .... on
~ f")
° It)
.... TI I I
en
0)0.... N þ:!: It)
110 CD .... ,.... .... ,.... ....
,... I
~ ~~ It) ..". ~I
- ....
(~ I I
W \" .S Nld
<..:) \ 1 T
<
1'1 ....1 þ' o :: ~I-
N ....1 ....T I ~
Q5 ( \ I 0:::
::)ffi \ T l-
(/)
a.~ 110 r-- ¡....-
I . . ~
a.. I I I I~
a -
z I- ....1
<C ~ _U
(/) I
I I
.... N M~
-
I I I
-----
o
0:::
<
>
lLJ
....1
:::>
o
II)
VI
5
<
o
..-
..-
...--,..~..,'~,~.~,._"._"_.~~_.---
ITEM 7f - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ADVERTISE
FOR A PROJECT MANAGER (NEW HIRE) FOR THE CRA
OBJECTIVE: To receive approval from the CRA to hire an additional professional employee to
execute the CRA Plan and oversee CRA projects.
CONSIDERATIONS: The CRA's Local Advisory Board has set an aggressive program to
implement the CRA Master Redevelopment Plan. In April 2005 they conducted an off-site goals
and objectives workshop. In May the Advisory Board briefed the CRA Board on the 5-year plan
to accomplish the goals and objectives, and accelerate the redevelopment of the CRA area.
With approval of multiple inffastructure projects, the workload will exceed the ability ofthe
Executive Director to effectively monitor and accomplish the projects on time and under budget.
FISCAL IMPACT: The CRA's FY2006 budget has a fully funded Expanded Position for a
Project Manager (titled Operations Analyst under the County's job descriptions and pay scale).
Total personnel cost $56,900 at the lowest end of the allowable pay scale.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County, including the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle, that may consider alternative land
use plans, modifications to development standards, and incentives to encourage redevelopment.
RECOMMENDATION: CRA approve the Executive Director to advertise for the hire ofa CRA
Project Manager to support execution of the CRA Master Plan and infrastructure, the Advisory
Board to assist in interviews and return with the best candidate for the CRA to approve.
SUBMITTED BY: DAVID JACKSON
DATE:
REVEIWED BY: _CRA ADVISORY BOARD_
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
Septcm1b.<r 8. 2005 Bayshor.: GakWay Triangle: CR.-\ ~I~ting
Code: 91004
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORDIA
CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION TITLE:
CRA Project Manager / Operations Analyst
PURPOSE OF CLASSIFICATION
This position manages and monitors special redevelopment projects and programs of high visibility and
economic benefit located in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Areas (CRA) of
the County. The purpose of this classification is to coordinate special projects and conduct research and
analysis of various departmental functions and operations. Work at this level is of a responsible, technical
or professional level relative to a supporting role in the management of the Bayshore Gateway CRA and
its projects, but without supervisory or managerial responsibilities. All authority and autonomy inherent
in this classification is at the discretion of and delegated by the Executive Director.
Work is performed exercising considerable initiative and is independent in undertaking and completing
redevelopment assignments. The position involves extensive contact with government officials, public
and private agencies, the development and business community, citizen groups, advisory boards and other
departments.
SALARY RANGE: $38,343 - $58,947
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS
The following duties are normal for this position. The omission of specific statements of the duties
does not exclude them from the classification ifthe work is similar, related, or a logical assignment for
this classification. Other duties may be required and assigned.
Coordinates special projects for the department, including the planning, design, implementation. and
evaluation of moderate construction/maintenance projects, management studies, introduction of new
programs, and various professional services: assists in defming the scope of the project: identifies and
recommends proper allocation of financial, material, and human resources committed to the project;
formulates solutions and resolves problems: facilitates implementation of the project: and provides
administrative support to the project as needed. Work at this level is usually relegated to coordination of
the CRA's participation in major CRA and/or county projects, and serves in a secondary or subordinate
role to the designated construction manager for assigned capital improvement projects.
Prepares and administers project budgets: submits justifications for budget requests; monitors expenditures
to ensure compliance \vith approved budget.
Prepares project schedules; monitors progress of project in meeting established schedule.
Coordinates process for bidding and contracting of services; prepares Requests For Proposal (RFPs) for
engineering services, design services, construction services, inspection services, maintenance services, or
other services; prepares bid packages; conducts pre-bid and pre-construction meetings; participates in
negotiations of scope of services and fees for professional services agreements: makes recommendations to
Boards regarding selection of vendors and awarding of contracts: compiles language for contracts and
specifications packages.
September 8.2005 Bayshore Gat~wav Triangle CRA :\I.xling 2
..,..___.._.'-.." "."._..~_~m_._'·'__'_'''_'_'~_·_''··__~_~'"_'·'~'·_·'··_~_.,.~._.,-,-,-
Oversees professional contractors and/or consultants providing services for projects: participates in the
evaluation and selection of contractors/consultants; interfaces with and monitors the
contractors/consultants to ensure timel:y and quality completion of project; facilitates cooperation with the
project throughout the organization: and provides information and support as needed.
Assists the Executive Director with strategic and long-range planning for CRA operations: participates in
planning efforts at the local and regionalleve1.
Administers grants for various state and federally funded programs: compiles and submits grant
applications; researches funding sources and program opportunities; assists departments with
grant activities; monitors and ensures compliance with aU requirements for awarded grants.
Represents the Executive Director and Advisory Board at various meetings, functions, and events: serves
as a liaison to various civic or governmental organizations and committees, taskforccs, boards, and
commissions: confers regularly with officials from the state, authorities, and commissions: provides
information about CRA operations: participates in discussions and decisions: and keeps the Executive
Director apprised of activities.
ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONS
Performs other related duties as required.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Bachelor's degree in Public/Business Administration, operations research, landscape architect, or related
field: supplemented by three years of experience in area of assignment; or any equivalent combination of
education, training, and experience in redevelopment, a municipality, or economic
development. Understands governmental laws, regulations and policies. Must possess and maintain a valid
Florida driver's license.
PERFORMANCE APTITUDES
Data Utilization: Requires the ability to evaluate, audit, deduce, and/or assess data using established
criteria. Includes exercising discretion in determining actual or probable consequences and in referencing
such evaluation to identify and select alternatives.
Human Interaction: Requires the ability to apply principles of persuasion and/or influence over others in
coordinating activities of a project, program, or designated area of responsibility.
Eauioment. Machinery. Tools. and Materials Utilization: Requires the ability to operate, maneuver
and/or control the actions of equipment, machinery, tools, and/or materials used in performing essential
functions.
Verbal Aotitude: Requires the ability to utilize a wide variety of reference, descriptive, advisory and/or
design data and information.
Mathematical Aotitude: Requires the ability to perform addition. subtraction, multiplication, and
division: the ability to calculate decimals and percentages; the ability to utilize principles of fractions: and
the ability to interpret graphs.
September 8. 2()()5 Bayshore üateway Triangle CRA Meeting 3
Functional Reasonine:: Requires the ability to apply principles of rational systems: to interpret
instructions furnished in \Hitten, oral, diagrammatic, or schedule fonn; and to exercise independent
judgment to adopt or modify methods and standards to meet variations in assigned objectives.
Situational Reasonine:: Requires the ability to exercise judgment, decisiveness and creativity 111
situations involving evaluation of information against measurable or verifiable criteria.
LeadershiD: Requires demonstrated ability to guide the division business plan, represents the Executive
Director or Advisory Board at various meetings; serves as a liaison to various committees: provides
information about CRA operations, procedures and policies: and assist in staff training or mentoring as the
situation may dictate.
Customer Service: Requires the ability to recognize and promote support for internal and external
customer needs; exercise judgment to resolve problems, issues and questions that arise: demonstrates an
ability to be flexible and sensitive ,,,ithin governmental policies and procedures to internal and external
customer needs and concerns.
Financial Accountabilitv: Requires the ability to analysis various operational data; makes
recommendations to improve cost and operational effectiveness; and participates in budget development
when necessary.
ADA COMPLIANCE
Physical Abilitv: Tasks require the ability to exert light physical effort in sedentary to light work, but
which may involve some lifting, carrying, pushing and/or pulling of objects and materials of light weight
(5-10 pounds). Tasks may involve extended periods of time in the field at project sites or at a keyboard or
workstation.
Sensory Reauirements: Some tasks require the ability to perceive and discriminate sounds, visual cues or
signals. Some tasks require the ability to communicate orally.
Environmental Factors: Essential functions are regularly performed without exposure to adverse
environmental conditions, however some field work with exposure to minor environment conditions may be
a function of assignment.
CoWer County is an Equal Opportunity Employer. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
the County will provide reasonable accommodations to qual~tìed individuals with disabilities and
encourages both prospective and current employees to discuss potential accommodations M"ith the
employer.
S~pt.:mbér 8. 2005 Uayshore Gateway Triangle CRA ~l~díng 4
~-~.....' -'-'''~'--'~-'-'_._'''---_.