The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 03/22/2011 Item #16I16/1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE March 22, 2011 1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED: A. Minutes: 1) Animal Services Advisory Board: Minutes of September 21, 2010. 2) Collier County Code Enforcement Board: Minutes of August 26, 2010; September 23, 2010. 3) Collier County Planning Commission: Minutes of January 6, 2011. 4) Contractors Licensing Board: Minutes of October 20, 2010; January 19, 2011. 5) Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Advisory Committee: Agenda of September 8, 2010; October 13, 2010; November 10. 2010; December 8, 2010. Minutes of August 25, 2010; September 8, 2010; October 13, 2010; November 10, 2010. 6) Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Committee: Minutes of November 1, 2010; January 4, 2011. 7) Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee: Minutes of July 26, 2010; September 27, 2010. 8) Immokalee Beautification Advisory Committee: Agenda of April 28, 2010; October 27, 2010; November 17, 2010; January 26, 2011. Minutes of March 24, 2010; September 22, 2010; October 27, 2010; November 17, 2010. 9) Land Acquisition Advisory Committee: Minutes of January 10, 2011. 10) Library Advisory Board: Minutes of September 15, 2010; October 13, 2010. 161 1 11) Parks and Recreation Advisory Board: Agenda of September 15, 2010; October 20, 2010. Minutes of August 18, 2010; September 15, 2010; October 20, 2010. 12) Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee: Agenda of February 1, 2011. Minutes of January 18, 2011. 13) Radio Road East M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee: Agenda of October 6, 2010; December 1, 2010; February 2, 2011. Minutes of October 6, 2010; December 1, 2010. 14) Vanderbilt Beach Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee: Agenda of November 4, 2010. Minutes of October 14, 2010. B. Other: 1) Code Enforcement Special Magistrate: Minutes of January 14, 2011. Fiala�- Henning 16I1A1 RECEIVED Coyle —�-- -- DEC 10 2010 Colena ember 21, 2010 Roam of County Commissioners MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF COLLIER COUNTY DOMESTIC ANIMAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, September 21, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Domestic Animal Services Advisory Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 6:30 PM in REGULAR SESSION at Domestic Animal Services Training Room, Davis Blvd., East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Michele Antonia VICE CHAIRMAN: Marcia Breithaupt Dr. Ruth Eisele (excused) Sergeant David Estes Tom Kepp, Jr. Dan Martin Jim Rich ALSO PRESENT: Amanda Townsend, Director DAS Dr. Karen Brown, Veterinarian, DAS Nan Gerhardt, Shelter Operations Mgr. Kathlene Drew, Volunteer Coordinator Hailey Alonso, Administrative Assistant Mist Como- 1611A September 21, 2010 1. Call to Order Chairman Michele Antonia called the meeting to order at 6:35 PM. II. Attendance Attendance was taken and a quorum established. Hailey Alonso presided over the power point presentation of the meeting packet projected on a large screen for the benefit of all present. III. Approval of Agenda Sgt David Estes moved to approve the agenda. Second by Jim Rich Carried unanimously, 6 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes of July 20, 2010 Sgt. David Estes moved to approve the minutes of June 20, 2010, as presented. Second by Dan Martin. Carried unanimously, 6-0. V. Old Business A. Director's Report Amanda Townsend reported on the following: • The 8/2/10 hearing on the horses' case resulted in a 2nd hearing being granted on the balance of the case; set for 9/22/ 10. • Strategic Planning workshop • November 20, 2010 — Howl -a -Day Jubilee. Four $1000 and one $500 sponsors have been obtained. Planning sessions are in progress. • Both an Animal Control Officer and a Shelter Tech were added to staff. • Repair of the drainage problem had been addressed through Facilities Management. • Outside Agencies' grants of $45,000 for cats have been received. • Meetings with rescue groups have proved productive. Other upcoming events showcasing adoptable pets: • October is Adopt a Dog month. • October 2 Take a New Leash on Life dog walk at North Regional Park, benefitting the Heart Association. • October 9 Child Safety Fair • Volunteer Orientation Kathlene Drew reported on some of the events at Howl -a -Day Jubilee: • Several types of brief workshops (15 minutes to I hour presentations on various areas of pet care) • A presentation to preview an upcoming (Expo or Conference) workshop being designed to cover the many aspects in the business of animal care. The two events will eventually merge into one event covering all aspects of animal care. • Special Guest — PGA Golfer Dennis Walters agreed to appear with his demonstration and inspirational show featuring his DAS adopted dog, Bucky. 1611 Al September 21, 2010 • Several Raffles for many items, including a cruise Appreciation was expressed to Kelly Fox for the many rattle donations obtained by her from Marco Island businesses. Jim Rich provided background information and read from the Grant Proposal entitled "Help'em Keep'em." The $10,000 Grant, benefitting For the Love of Cats, will aid low income families with sterilizations and other means to help them keep their pets. He stated, since 1/1/2010, 151 of the 157 cats taken in were in need of sterilization. Shelters could not accommodate that type of volume: so they would benefit also. A "Home Again" Grant was also received to aid seniors in the adoption of older cats. The program, called Seniors, for Seniors will start in approximately 3 weeks. He recited the qualifications and supplies provided to get seniors started in pet ownership. A poster describing the program will be posted in slated areas. Nan Gerhardt noted a 28 yr. old horse was taken into the shelter. Dr. Brown reported the "return to owner spay & neuter program" was actively utilized since its inception. She also noted the absence of current rabies shots and micro -chips showing up in most of these dogs. Amanda Townsend noted DAS was negotiating to become a host site for a low - cost Spay & Neuter Clinic with the aim of providing monthly clinics; possibly holding one in lmmokalee. The $50 refund for "unaltered" licenses resulted in 12 responses. B. Bordetella Vaccine Dr. Karen Brown provided answers to questions and comments received on why vaccination for Bordetella (also spelled Bordatella) was not routine. She stated a 6 month past trial was conducted which showed little difference in vaccinated and non - vaccinated animals regarding canine infectious respiratory disease. She spoke about symptoms, causes, injected & nasal medicines and treatments. She commented she was not opposed to a future 6 month trials if so warranted. A brief discussion followed on aspects of the issue and measures to pursue. VI. New Business A. 5 -Year Plan (overhead projection provided) Amanda Townsend commented on the 2011 Balance Score Card and the four areas noted on the Strategic Planning Business Practices charts. She reviewed the goals of the Ten Priority Projects the Advisory Board had created last year, highlighting those that had been completed, those rolled over into another year and those needing more input, updating or adjustments. Targeted for the coming year were: Emergency evacuation plans for the shelter Pet Lemon Laws Grant Projects Penalty- Collection Process Volunteer assistance in Marketing Plan and Education Plan Programs Tom Kepp suggested volunteers ride with and aid Animal Control Officers 1611 Al September 21. 2010 Sgt. Estes suggested using Language Line for translations in any language. The Sheriff s Office has information on this connection. VIL Public Comment A. Topic TBA (open discussion) Each meeting the visiting public selects a topic for discussion by "drawing from a hat" a topic they put in at the beginning of the discussions. The topic chosen Sept. 21, 2010 was Dog Complaints/Education DDB. Teri Licastro, animal rights advocate and volunteer with Dogs Deserve Better (DDB), provided photos of a dog (before and after 3 months) showing, in her opinion, a lack of care. She stated their organization was ready to participate in education programs. Staff Members explained tracking systems, 7 -day compliance procedures, determination of cruelty /neglect, licensing /vaccination compliance, education, Public Records Laws, perceived coercion, Animal Control Ordinance and legal compliance. Active discussion followed on the above topics. Education packets may be developed by rescue groups to hand out to pet owners. B Individual Comments Kelly Fox favored a 6 month trial for canine infectious respiratory disease. She read from a text message sent by Bibi Barrett commenting on her experience with a DAS adopted dog who become sick shortly after adoption. Her opinion was that adoptions would be hampered if a perception exists that sick dogs were put up for adoption and large medical expenses incurred, as people expect a healthy pet. Amanda Townsend spoke ofseeking Grant funding which could be used for special individual collars with a snap -hook lead that would help alleviate transfer of infectious disease, as an aid to their normal health checks, for adopted dogs. VIIL Advisory Board Member Comments Dan Martin noted the landscaping on Davis Blvd. was blocking the DAS entry sign. Jim Rich stated in his contact with ACOs, he found them compassionate and caring; though at times, may be hampered by regulations and laws. Sgt. David Estes mentioned the cool mornings and pleasant weather will encourage attendance at all the upcoming planned events. Tom Kepp commented, though he was a proponent of education, education without enforcement wouldn't work; more emphasis was needed on enforcement. Marcia Breithaupt inquired about educating the public on DAS's location. Many people had no idea where DAS was. She suggested distribution of DAS brochures by Board Members and Animal Control Officers to help in the promotion of adoption and elimination of euthanasia Next Advisory Board Meeting is scheduled for October 19, 2010 at the Domestic Animal Training Room, Davis Blvd., Naples, Florida 1611A1 September 21, 2010 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of the Chair at 8:30 PM. COLLIER COUNTY DOMESTIC ANIMAL SERVICES Cfitman Michele Anto a r These minutes approved by Board/Committee on � Vt . / '/ as presented V or as amended yp'' 5 1611A2 1 v-� August 26, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD RECEIVED Naples, Florida NOV 2 9 1010 August 26, 2010 Roam o, Donn � romm - issroners LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Code Enforcement Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East N Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: f,uL-& �- Kenneth Kelly Larry Dean Ron Doino (Alternate) Robert Kaufman James Lavinski Gerald Lefebvre LionelL'Esperance Tony Marino (Alternate) Herminio Ortega ALSO PRESENT: Jean Rawson, Attorney for the Board Diane Flagg, Code Enforcement Director Jen Waldron, Code Enforcement Specialist Page 1 MISC. Corres: Date: �, /' . tem #:�� 16 A2 .gust 26, 2010 CHAIRMAN KELLY: Good morning. I'd like to call the Code Enforcement Board meeting to order. Notice: Respondent may be limited to 20 minutes per case presentation, unless the additional time is granted by the Chair. Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item will receive up to five minutes, unless the time is adjusted. All parties participating in the public hearing are asked to observe Roberts Rules of Order and speak one at a time so that the court reporter can record all statements being made. Any persons who decide to appeal a decision of this board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Neither Collier County nor the Code Enforcement Board shall be responsible for providing this record. May I have roll call? MS. WALDRON: Mr. Ken Kelly? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Robert Kaufman? MR. KAUFMAN: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Gerald Lefebvre? MR. LEFEBVRE: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. James Lavinski? MR. LAVINSKI: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Tony Marino? MR. MARINO: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Larry Dean? MR. DEAN: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Lionel L'Esperance? MR. UESPERANCE: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Ron Doino? MR. DOINO: Here. Page 2 lb1lA� I August 26, 2010 MS. WALDRON: And Mr. Herminio Ortega is absent. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thank you. Do we have any changes to the agenda? MS. WALDRON: We do. Under number four, public hearings /motions, letter A, motions. Motion for extension of time, number two, Matthew Searles, Case CESD20090013598 has been withdrawn. Under letter C, hearings, number one, Case CELU20100001353, Gustavo F. Zumbana, Julia Zumbana and Anderson Zumbana has been withdrawn. Number three, Case CESD20090013598, Matthew Searles, has been withdrawn. Number four, Case CESD20090000998, Naples Affordable Housing, Inc., has been withdrawn. Number six, Case CESD20090012302, Lester and Mary F. Kempf, has been withdrawn. (At which time, Mr. Ortega enters the boardroom.) MS. WALDRON: Under number five, old business, letter A, motion for imposition of fines /liens, number one, Case CESD20090002945, Lisa Dasher, has been withdrawn. Under number six, new business, we do have one addition. This will be to discuss the vehicle for hire task force. And that is all the changes I have. CHAIRMAN KELLY: All right, thank you. Also, for the record, I want to note that we do have a late arrival. And because we have a full quorum, the alternates would be able to participate in discussion but will not have voting rights at this meeting. MR. LEFEBVRE: Mr. Kelly? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Sir. MR. LEFEBVRE: If I may make one suggestion. Looks like we only have one respondent here. And I don't know where she falls in the agenda, but maybe we can move her up and hear her first -- Page 3 16 I 1 A mgust 26, 2010 MR. L'ESPERANCE: I agree. MR. LEFEBVRE: And that way she doesn't have to stay here throughout the -- MR. DEAN: Good idea. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Good idea. No problem. We haven't had a motion yet, so what we'll do is if you don't mind, if we could get your name we can move you up to the front so you don't have to wait around all morning. MS. GILOT: Marie Gilot. MS. WALDRON: It's number two under imposition of fines. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay. And since it's your motion, if you want to make it and with the approval. MR. LEFEBVRE: I'd like to make a motion to change the agenda to move Marie Gilot, CESD20080015112 to the front -- or top of the agenda. MR. DEAN: Second the motion. CHAIRMAN KELLY: And just for clarification, did you want that before motions? MR. LEFEBVRE: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay. MS. WALDRON: Sure. And we also do have an attorney here for number three under imposition of fines. So there are two present. MR. LEFEBVRE: Okay. And we can move that one up also. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, number three under imposition of fines would be Clyde and Susan Bryan. MS. WALDRON: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN KELLY: And then also on that case there was -- everyone should have gotten a sheet with a revised imposition of fines dec. page. Okay, we do have an amended motion. Do you want to amend your second, Larry? MR. DEAN: Yeah, I'll amend the second. 16 J 1 qAL ust 6 2010 CHAIRMAN KELLY: Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR.ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: And the agenda has been accepted with modifications. Next we move on to the minutes of last month's meeting. Any changes or modifications? (No response.) MR. KAUFMAN: I'll make a motion we accept the minutes as written. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, we have a motion. Do we have a second? MR. DEAN: I'll second the motion. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Second as written (sic). Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All those in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. Page 5 1bj1AL August 26, 2010 CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: And approved as written. Okay, moving on to public hearings, we're going to go with Mrs. -- is it Gilot? With a good accent. If you'd like to step up to the podium, we'll go ahead and swear you in. (Speakers were duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Mrs. Gilot, could you pull the microphone closer to your mouth; it helps the court reporter. Okay, this is for an imposition of fines. And normally what happens in these cases is we'd like to know from you what the status is. And I assume that you would be therefore asking for a reduction or an abatement. However, our paperwork says that it is not in compliance. And typically we don't allow any abatement of fines if something hasn't been in compliance. So would you like to speak to that for a moment? MS. GILOT: Well, what this, the abatement you say? CHAIRMAN KELLY: That means that you have fixed or corrected the problems, the original -- what was originally cited, that's all fixed and repaired. MS. GILOT: Okay. I asked on the 25th of March to come in front of the code, because I don't have any money to do it right now. And by that time there was Miss -- I think it's Miss Maria was working with me. This is the letter I wrote to them: I would like to come in front of the code to ask for more time to do it. And that's the reason why I'm here today, because I don't have any money, and I'm not working right now. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Just for procedural issues, let me speak to the inspector real quick. Inspector, it's not in compliance, right? MR. WALKER: That's correct, sir. CHAIRMAN KELLY: And have you noticed any progress at A2 1 161 1 August 26, 2010 all? MR. WALKER: None whatsoever. There has been no -- let me rephrase that. She -- we met with her after our last hearing, myself, Ms. Rodriguez, and Ms. Alamar Finnegan from permitting. We addressed her violation with her and gave her an indication of what she needed to do. At that point she met again with Ms. Alamar from permitting, if I'm not mistaken, a week ago. And Miss Alamar indicated that she had told her exactly what she needed to do again, and that all she needed to do was reap the permit, which she hasn't done to date. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Do you know approximately how much those permit fees would be? MR. WALKER: I'm not specifically sure with regards to the cost of the permits, no. CHAIRMAN KELLY: May I ask you -- MS. GILOT: Sir? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Yes. MS. GILOT: When I went over there, the lady asked me to draw about the shed, to bring that to her and draw the picture of the shed, because we were talking about the shed, not the other -- this is from the -- CHAIRMAN KELLY: If I may, if you're going to show us those pictures, we need to admit them as evidence. And if we did that, the court reporter would take them from you. So do you have other copies? MS. GILOT: Yes. No, I don't have another copy. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Let me also ask the board, it sounds like we're steering more towards a motion for an extension of additional time. Any thoughts from the board as to whether or not we're willing to entertain that? MR. DEAN: I have one question. MS. GILOT: But they want me to tear the shed down. They said Page 7 16 41 AC August 26, 2010 I build the shed. I did not build the shed, because it is on the papers from the mortgage company. What I did with them is repair them because of the Hurricane Wilma. CHAIRMAN KELLY: We're not technically supposed to see those just yet. Let me talk to the board and see what we'd like to do here. MR. DEAN: I had one question. On the remodeling to your home, is that done or you're still doing it? MS. GILOT: I'm still doing it because I didn't get the permit yet because I don't have any money to do it. MR. DEAN: But I'm -- are you still working on that right now? MS. GILOT: Yes, I do. MR. DEAN: You're building on it, right? MS. GILOT: I'm not building. It already there, sir. MR. DEAN: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Gerald? MR. LEFEBVRE: Typically we look more favorably if the operational costs have been paid. In this case they have not been paid, which is in the amount of $80.29. MS. GILOT: Okay, the reason why I did not pay -- MR. LEFEBVRE: I'm not finished, ma'am. MS. GILOT: Oh, excuse me. MR. LEFEBVRE: I am not of the feeling of extending -- granting an extension, due to the fact that the operational costs have not been paid. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any other comments from the board? MR. ORTEGA: I have a question. I'm -- MS. GILOT: But when I went over there to pay it -- CHAIRMAN KELLY: Hang on one second. Originally -- to answer your question, it was originally from 30 days from the first order. MS. GILOT: Yes. I went over there to pay it. The lady told me 164 1 A August 26, 2010 if I have enough evidence, be better for me not to pay. I told here, I want to pay it. She said, no, because they have to refund me the money. And she told me no. CHAIRMAN KELLY: That's a -- that maybe would be the permitting department, but the code enforcement investigation fees are something that we can't waive, and it's something that would be required regardless. MS. FLAGG: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Yes. MS. FLAGG: Let me offer that if the board decides not to grant a motion for extension, that at the point she comes into compliance, we will on her behalf take it to the Board of County Commissioners and ask them to waive the fines and release the lien. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, that sounds great. Did you want to comment, or -- MR. ORTEGA: Yeah, I'm a little bit confused. You said something about reap? MR. WALKER: Yes. Actually, she applied for a permit, and the actual permit that she applied for was issued and they completed the work, but they failed to call in inspections. MR. ORTEGA: You mean final inspections? MR. WALKER: Final inspections. There was I think two remaining final inspections that were to be done. And all she needed to do -- there was two separate issues, and we're kind of rehearing it again, but there was two separate issues: One was the shed and one was the actual addition to the house. We had spoke to her on both of those issues, one of which she knew that she -- actually both of which she knew that she needed to actually reap the addition as well as get a permit for the shed, because the shed size has increased from the point it was originally put on there. So it was actually expanded. MR. ORTEGA: I see. Thank you. 16 1 1 AZ August 26, 2010 CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay. Mr. Kaufman? MR. KAUFMAN: I'd like to -- I think our hands are tied. When I see something as far as that it is not changed, it still doesn't comply and that the operational costs have not been paid, it has always been our duty to impose the fines. So I'd like to make a motion that we impose the fine, knowing that should you bring this into compliance, the head of code enforcement has said that they would on your behalf go to the Board of County Commissioners and ask for the fine to be abated. So that's my motion. MR. LEFEBVRE: I second that motion. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, we have a motion and a second. For the record, I'll go ahead and read what we're doing. This is CEB Case CESD20080015112, Board of County Commissioners versus Marie Gilot, G- I- L -O -T, respondent. Violations of Florida Building Code, Chapter 22. Location: 1707 6th Avenue, Immokalee, Florida. And the total fines are broken down as item number one and number two, rate of $150 per day for a period between June 26th and August 26th, 2010, for 62 days, for a total of $9,300. And fines continue to accrue. And item number five, operational cost of $80.29 for a total amount of $9,380.29. Any further discussion? MS. GILOT: So when they asked me to come to court in June, I wasn't here, I was on missionary. Why do you have to charge me for that? CHAIRMAN KELLY: One second. Let me finish this vote before we can enter any more public comment. Any further discussion? (No response.) Page 10 161 1 A2 August 26, 2010 CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR.ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? Okay. I'm sorry. So you said you were on a missionary trip? MS. GILOT: Yes. CHAIRMAN KELLY: And you weren't here. MS. GILOT: Yes. And I request to come today, and that's why I'm here today. CHAIRMAN KELLY: I appreciate that. And what we have here is we've gone ahead and imposed the fines. And the reason why is because this is what we were presented with today. If you wanted an extension of time, we had the opportunity to do that by just simply writing a letter and requesting time. But we passed that opportunity and this is what we were presented with. So unfortunately this is what we had to vote on. However, you did have the director of code enforcement stand up on your behalf and say that as soon as this comes into compliance, if it's done in a timely manner, she will approach the Board of County Commissioners who has the right to abate all of the fines on your behalf. Abate means to wipe out or to take off all the fines. So I would suggest that you continue to work diligently as money becomes available. And once everything is okay, have the investigator come out and take a look for you and they'll bring it in front of the Board of County Commissioners to try to get those fines taken off of your home for you. Okay? Page 11 161 1 A2 August 26, 2010 Next case. MR. WALKER: Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thank you, sir. Next case is going to be CEB Case CESD20080014486, Board of County Commissioners versus Clyde and Susan Bryan, represented by Mr. Rankin. MR. RANKIN: Yes, Your Honor, I'm her Power of Attorney. He's dead. CHAIRMAN KELLY: We have a revised order that states that the respondent is in compliance. You're an attorney, you don't have to be sworn. MR. RANKIN: Yes, Your Honor. That first one was a mistake. And I have paid the fees also. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, great. MR. RANKIN: And -- CHAIRMAN KELLY: I'm sorry, Mr. Rankin, let's get the investigator sworn in. MR. RANKIN: No problem, Your Honor. (Speaker was duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: If we can, let's let Collier County read this one in correctly. Jen, do you want to read this one in, since it happened so quickly? MS. WALDRON: Ms. Sorrels will. MS. SORRELS: For the record, Azure Sorrels, Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator. Reference to Case No. CESD200080014486, Board of County Commissioners versus Clyde and Susan Bryan. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws, Chapter 22, Building and Building Regulations, Article 2, Florida code -- excuse me, Florida Building Code, adoption and amendment of the Florida Building Code, Section 22- 26(B), subsection 104.1.3.5, and Section Page 12 16i,��A� August 26, 2010 22- 26(B), subsection 106.1.2, and Collier County Ordinance 04 -41, as amended, Section 10.02.06(B)(1)(a). Location: 549 Morehead Manor, Naples, Florida. Folio 60583200008. Description of past order: Unpermitted enclosure of carport to include decking and screening. On November 19th, 2009 the Code Enforcement Board issued a finding of facts /conclusion of law and order. Respondent was found in violation of the referenced ordinances and ordered to correct the violation. See the attached Order of the Board, OR 49516, Page 1, for more information. The respondent has complied with the Code Enforcement Board orders as of June 1 Ith, 2010. The fines and costs to date are described as the following: Order item number one and two, fines at a rate of $200 per day for the period between January 19th, 2010 through June 11 th, 2010, 144 days, for the total of $28,800. Order item number five, operational cost of $80.29 have been paid. Total amount to date, $28,800. And if I could just refresh your memory, the last hearing, it was scheduled for an imposition of fines. The county had withdrawn. Mr. Rankin was recently hired by the respondents and he speediously (sic) -- if that's a word -- had abated the violations and brought the property into compliance. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Great. I want to first commend you on the speed at which you read that. I'm sure Cherie's very grateful. And two, would you be able to tell us if the county has any opposition to abatement of the fines? MS. SORRELS: No, we don't have any. MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to abate the fines. MR. KAUFMAN: Second. MR. RANKIN: Thank you, Your Honor. Page 13 161 1 t1 A Z August 26, 2010 CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any discussion? MR. DEAN: I have one question. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay. MR. DEAN: On the fines it says here 44,000, and the other one it says 28 -8. Are we abating 28 -8 or are we abating 44,000, as read as 28? MS. SORRELS: We're abating the 28,800. The first copy that you had received was incorrect, sir. MR. DEAN: Oh. MR. LEFEBVRE: The dates changed from June 11 -- or from August -- MR. DEAN: I see that, okay. MR. LEFEBVRE: That's the difference. CHAIRMAN KELLY: All right, any other discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All those in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) MR. RANKIN: Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Great job, Mr. Rankin. MR. RANKIN: And we tried hard. And thank you very much. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thank you, sir. Okay, now we're going to 4 -A, motions. Motion for extension of time. Allen and Margaret Vincent. I believe in your packet you should have a notice, a letter from Mr. Vincent. Page 14 161.1. AC August 26, 2010 MS. O'FARRELL: Good morning. (Speaker was duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Susan, in the letter it speaks to Mr. Vincent working diligently to revegetate and to clear out like he was supposed to. Do you want to confirm that, or -- MS. O'FARRELL: Yes, I can confirm that they have been working. I brought photos, if you'd like to see them. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Would you like to admit that into evidence, or is the testimony satisfactory? MR. ORTEGA: I have a question. Was this a complaint or was there construction going on while -- why were they made to remove the vegetation, exotic vegetation? MS. O'FARRELL: There was a complaint made by the neighborhood of the adjacent property. MR. LEFEBVRE: Has he stated a time frame for an extension? MS. O'FARRELL: I believe they were asking for three months. I wanted to let you know, though, that on the 1 l th I was on the property up to my ankles in water, so it was very wet, and we might want to consider giving them a little more time. MR. LEFEBVRE: Maybe to the end of the year? Would that be sufficient, you think, or a little further? MS. O'FARRELL: Yeah, or a little further after that, maybe. MR. LEFEBVRE: Six months? MS. O'FARRELL: What a great idea. MR. KAUFMAN: Originally this was given six months. MS. O'FARRELL: Yes, they've had another extension of time already, yes. MR. KAUFMAN: So originally it was given six months, and during that six months they've been working on this property? MS. O'FARRELL: After the CEB board asked me to go out and mark all the trees, I went out and marked all the trees on the property, and they began removing the trees. I'm not sure when exactly. But Page 15 16 1 1 A � August 26, 2010 they had not completed before the rainy season started, and so there was a lot of resprouting of the Brazilian pepper. And actually the melaleuca was resprouting as well, so they hadn't completely finished cutting down all of the trees and they had the resprouts to deal with as well. So that's why they were asking for more time. CHAIRMAN KELLY: For the record, I show the original order would have been up August 24th, which was yesterday. MS.O'FARRELL: Right. CHAIRMAN KELLY: And I don't see an extension. So this I guess would be the first extension that they're requesting. And the original was a six -month time frame. So is there a motion or a feeling, discussion? MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to extend another six months, the period another six months. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Another six months from today? MR. LEFEBVRE: From today. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Do we have a second? MR. KAUFMAN: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Seconded by Mr. Kaufman. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Great. Thank you, Ms. O'Farrell. Page 16 16 1 1 A� i August 26, 2010 MS. O'FARRELL: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KELLY: That ends the motions. Now we'll move on to C, hearings. Number two, Maria and Sergio Gomez. The respondents I don't believe are here. (Speaker was duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Good morning, Mr. Paul. MR. PAUL: Good morning. MS. WALDRON: This is in violation of ordinance Collier County Code of Laws, Chapter 22, Article 2, Florida Building Code, Section 22 -26.13, 104.5.1.4.4. Description of violation: Permit No. 2004030440 for a fence and Permit No. 2004032107 for the tiki but were both abandoned and C.O. never obtained. Location/address where violation exists: 4983 17th Avenue Southwest, Naples, Florida, 34116. Folio 36130560002. Name and address of owner /person in charge of violation location: Sergio and Maria D. Gomez, 4983 17th Avenue Southwest, Naples, Florida, 34116. Date violation first observed: March 26th, 2010. Date owner /person in charge given Notice of Violation: April 3rd, 2010. Date on/by which violation to be corrected: April 30th, 2010. Date of reinspection: July 6th, 2010. Results of reinspection: The violation remains. I'll now turn it over to Investigator Renald Paul. MR. PAUL: How are you doing? For the record, Renald Paul, Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator. I'd like to present at this time evidence and Exhibits B -1 and 2. MR, KAUFMAN: Motion to accept. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Motion and a second. Page 17 161 1 A2 J August 26, 2010 Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) MR. PAUL: As you'll see in the first picture, just shows a picture from the street, the fence that they have on the property, which is one of the violations. And the second photograph, I know it's a little rough to see, it's a little dark, that's the tiki hut, if you can see it in the back. Yeah, back there is the tiki hut. This case began on 3/26 of 2010. We had gotten a complaint that there were unpermitted things on the property. I'd gone out, observed they did have a fence and a tiki hut, and I did research. After researching the two permits, found that the prior owners had applied for the permits but had never gotten any inspections or certificate of completion. At that time I completed a Notice of Violation which I did attempt to serve to the property owner, but no one was home so it was sent certified mail. The certified mail was returned signed by the property owner. And on 4/16 of 2010, I received a phone call from a Daniel Gomez, which is the son of the property owner. And what he pretty much said was his parents were losing the house and they were going through a foreclosure at this time. And that's pretty much what they 161 1 A 2 August 26, ao 10 were waiting on, on the foreclosure and when they needed to leave the premises. I did several reinspections. No permits have ever been applied for. The bank does not have title at this time to this property. There was a final judgment that had gone through, but we're still waiting on the title at this time. The notice of hearing was posted at the property on 8/6 of 2010. All affidavits completed. And we're here today. And I was out there yesterday and the violation remains. MR. KAUFMAN: Motion to find them in violation. MR. DEAN: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Motion and a second by Mr. Dean. Any discussion? MR. LEFEBVRE: I have a question, procedural question. Jean? MS. RAWSON: Yes. MR. LEFEBVRE: Being that there's been a final judgment issued and still the bank does not take title, do they have to be noticed of the hearing? MS. RAWSON: I'm sure that they will be noticed of the hearing, because I think Diane probably works closely with all the banks on these foreclosures, so I'm sure they're going to know about it. But right now it's -- this lien is going to be against the title holder, which is still the respondent Gomez. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All those in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. 1 6 1 , 1 4ALgust 26, 2010 MR. ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, a violation exists. Do you have a recommendation? MR. PAUL: Yes, I do. We ask that the respondents pay all operational costs in the amount of $81.15 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days of this hearing. We ask that the respondents to -- is required to obtain any and all permits as required by Collier County for any and all additions to the residence or obtain permits for removal of all additions to this property, and obtain all required inspection and certificate of completion within "X" amount of days of this hearing or be fined "X" amount of dollars for each day the violation remains unabated. The respondent must notify the code enforcement investigator when the violation has been abated in order to conduct a final inspection to confirm abatement. If the respondent fails to abate the violation, the county may abate the violation and may use the assistance of the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of this order. And all costs of abatement shall be assessed to the property owner. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Very good. Anyone want to try? MR. KAUFMAN: Let me give it a shot. Let me fill in the blanks. To be brought into compliance in 60 days, and a fine of $100 a day subsequent to bringing it into compliance. CHAIRMAN KELLY: We have a motion. Do we have a second? MR. LAVINSKI: Second. Page 20 16 iq nun August 26, 2010 CHAIRMAN KELLY: Do we have any discussion? MR. LEFEBVRE: I think 60 days may be a short period, considering that the bank does not have title and that the current owners obviously are not going to take care of the problem. I think 60 days may be a short period. MR. DEAN: Yeah, but I think a short period, doesn't it give them a notice? And if you give them longer, we're anticipating something that might never happen. That's why I like short notice, it puts everybody on notice what's happening. MR. LEFEBVRE: Well, I think it's inevitable that the bank is taking it. I mean, it's in foreclosure. And typically there's a lag period before they take title to the property. Just my thoughts. MR. DEAN: I know, but I don't know that for sure. I know what I'm reading and what I'm hearing, but -- MR. KAUFMAN: I don't think it matters whether it's 60 days or 360 days. MR. DEAN: Well, it does matter, because it puts somebody on notice that there's a problem. What if you have a buyer for the home and they don't know about the problem? MR. KAUFMAN: I'm agreeing with you. MR. LEFEBVRE: It will come up in the title search. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any other discussion? MR. LEFEBVRE: Diane has something. MS. FLAGG: Mr. Chairman, I would just offer that we try to push these through, if the banks don't react. Once we put a lien on it, it shows up in the public record and it gives the buyer ample warning that there's something going on, which then the bank does correct it. We still have a few banks that like to play the game a little bit. CHAIRMAN KELLY: So are you saying that the order itself won't necessarily be recorded? MS. FLAGG: The order will be recorded. But once it's recorded then there's an actual -- so if they don't -- if the buyer does not do a Page 21 161,.A2 ugust 26, 2010 code lien search -- which is not required; we recommend it strongly, but if they don't do it and there's nothing in the public record, it's not going to show up. Once the order is recorded, then it will show up when they do the title search. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any other discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? MR. LEFEBVRE: (Indicating.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: And it carried -- oh, one opposition? MR. LEFEBVRE: Yes. CHAIRMAN KELLY: By Gerald. All right. It does pass, though. Great. Thanks, Mr. Paul. MR. PAUL: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Next case, Case No. 5, Mark Shapiro, Attorney, Trust, Collier 54th Terrace Trust. (Speaker was duly sworn.) MS. WALDRON: This is in reference to violation of ordinance Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Section 10.02.06(B)(1)(a). Description of violation: Garage that was converted to living space and an enclosed laundry room added to the rear of the structure without permits. Location/address where violation exists: 2320 51st Terrace Southwest, Naples, Florida, 34116. Folio 36313040006. Page 22 16I1AL August 26, 2010 Name and address of owner /person in charge of violation location: Mark L. Shapiro, PA Trust, Collier 51st Terrace Trust, 2320 51st Terrace Southwest, Naples, Florida, 34116. Date violation first observed: August 10th, 2009. Date owner /person in charge given notice of violation: Note of violation posted at the property and the Collier County Courthouse on October 22nd, 2009. Date on/by which violation to be corrected: November 22nd, 2009. Date of reinspection: June 14th, 2010. Results of reinspection: Violation remains. Now I'd like to turn it over to Investigator Mucha. MR. MUCHA: Good morning. For the record, Joe Mucha, Collier County Code Enforcement. I have eight photographs taken on August 10th, 2009 by myself that I'd like to submit into evidence. MR. KAUFMAN: Motion to accept. MR. LAVINSKI: Second. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second by Mr. Lavinski. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Ave. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR.ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) MR. MUCHA: This is just a picture of what the house looks like All in favor? Page 23 1611 kst 26, 2010 from the street. That far wall there is actually -- on the other side is where the garage door is. So you can see that they enclosed -- put a wall up in the garage. This is an electrical panel that is in the garage. Cover was taken off of it. This is kind of like a little makeshift sink that was in the garage. Some cabinets. This is a bathroom that was installed inside the garage. And it also had a shower facility as well. This is an enclosed laundry room that was added onto the back of the house. It was not up to code. And this is just taken to show actually it's been used as a laundry room. This case initiated on August 10th of 2009 as a -- we actually received a complaint from the resident that was living there that she had some issues. Her water was shut off and there was also some other issues that she had. So while I was there to inspect the property maintenance issues, that's when I observed that the garage had been converted to living space. And also, based on what the laundry room that was attached looked like, I was pretty sure that that wasn't going to be permitted as well. And I did my research and could not find permits for either conversion or addition. MR. KAUFMAN: So this was reported by the renter? MR. MUCHA: Yes, there was a renter at the time. And also when I did my research, I found that the property was in foreclosure. And the renter was kind of in limbo, she wasn't paying the rent, and I think she was kind of just holding on, staying there as long as she could. So I was kind of waiting to see what was going to happen with her. MR. LEFEBVRE: When was the last time you were at the Page 24 16 11A� 4 August 26, 2010 property again? MR. MUCHA: I was actually at the property yesterday. MR. LEFEBVRE: Is the tenant still in place? MR. MUCHA: No, no, the property vacant. The property has actually been vacant since November of 2009. And that's kind of -- I'm going to get into that real quick. I ended up having to post the property on October 22nd, 2009, as previously stated. I sent the Notice of Violation, certified mail and it was returned unclaimed so I posted the property on October 22nd, 2009. And at that time the tenant was still there, or it appeared that she was still there. I couldn't confirm or deny that it was vacant. But when I went back in November, I went -- I made a site visit on November 24th, 2009 and I was able to confirm that the property was vacant. And at that time, because of the property being in foreclosure, the case was referred to the foreclosure team to try and see if we could get the bank to come in and get some compliance. But I guess because with it being interior violations, the bank was unable to -- you know, because they don't have title, they're not going to be able to get permits or, you know, get a demo permit and do the things that needed to be done. So the case was actually returned back to me in June of this year, June I lth, 2010. I made a site visit on June 14th, 2010, confirmed that the property was still vacant. So at that time I elected to forward the case to the Code Enforcement Board. I made a visit on August 4th, 2010, posted a notice of hearing. Property is still vacant. Made a site visit yesterday, property is still vacant. No permits have been applied for. Remains in the same state. MR. LEFEBVRE: What's the status of the bank's -- MR. MUCHA: It's still in notice of lis pendens. MR. LEFEBVRE: Wow. Thank you. Page 25 161 1A2 August 26, 2010 MR. ORTEGA: Has there been any communication between you and the owner? MR. MUCHA: No, sir. MR. ORTEGA: Never? MR. MUCHA: I attempted to -- I sent a note of violation certified mail, and I've dealt with Mr. Shapiro in the past, and I just haven't had much success. MR. ORTEGA: Are we talking about the same Shapiro, the attorney? MR. MUCHA: Yes, sir. MR. KAUFMAN: The panel that's missing from the electrical box, the electric is turned on in that house? MR. MUCHA: It was at the time when the tenant was there. I believe it's no longer turned on. It's been vacant since November of last year. MR. KAUFMAN: I'd like to make a motion that we find them in violation. MR. DEAN: I'll second the motion. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All those in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKL• Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay. Do you have a recommendation? MR. MUCHA: Yes, sir. My recommendation is Code Page 26 16 I 1 A2 August 26, 2010 Enforcement Board orders the respondent to pay all operational costs in the amount of $80.57 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days, and to abate all violations by: Hiring a general contractor licensed in Collier County to obtain all applicable permits, inspections and certificates of occupancy /completion for all unpermitted improvements made to the structure, or remove all unpermitted improvements made to the structure and restore to a permitted state within blank days or a fine of blank per day until violation is abated. The respondent must notify the code enforcement investigator when the violation has been abated in order to conduct a final inspection to confirm abatement. If the respondent fails to abate the violation, the county may abate the violation and may use the assistance of the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of this order, and all costs of abatement shall be assessed to the property owner. MR. KAUFMAN: I'd like to add one thing to your proposal, and that is I don't think you specifically mentioned that the panel that's in the garage be covered. I don't think that might have been part of the original problem, but it is the biggest problem in that house right now. If they turn the electric on, you put your hand in, you die. So I'd like to include that as part of the remediation. MR. MUCHA: Yes, sir. MR. KAUFMAN: And I'd like to fill in the blanks on your proposal, and I'd like to make a fine of $200 a day and it be remediated within 60 days. CHAIRMAN KELLY: We have a motion. Do we have a second? MR. LAVINSKL• Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Seconded by Mr. Lavinski. Any discussion? MR. LEFEBVRE: Yes. Question. Are we allowed to request that the respondent do something that has not been found as a Page 27 16 ( Augusk .2010, violation? Because the panel is not -- did you find that specifically as a violation? MR. MUCHA: That was just -- I took that picture at the time because there was somebody that was in there. I mean, this case here is more in regards to the permit. MR. LEFEBVRE: The enclosed garage and the laundry room -- MR. MUCHA: Yes, sir. MR. LEFEBVRE: -- not specifically the electrical panel. Which was probably there prior to the garage being, I mean, obviously -- MR. MUCHA: Yes, sir. MR. LEFEBVRE: -- enclosed. MR. KAUFMAN: I think if you bring a licensed contractor in and he would see or she would see an exposed panel like that, that is part of their license to abate that problem. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Is the electrical panel in the garage? MR. MUCHA: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN KELLY: And is it possible that they needed to gain access to the electric panel in order to do the garage conversion by possibly adding more electrical outlets or something to that effect? MR. MUCHA: That's possible. CHAIRMAN KELLY: So it could be part of the -- it could have been part of the violation, if that's the case. MR. LEFEBVRE: I'm just worried that the respondent can say you're trying to tell me to do something that I was not noticed for. MS. RAWSON: Well, they were noticed basically for converting the living space in the laundry room and an addition in the garage, so that might have been a part of it. You know, I don't think there's a real problem if you tell them to close that panel, especially if you're going to give them 60 days to get a licensed contractor. MR. UESPERANCE: May I bring up something we have to consider here. I don't think we have been getting much of a response from 16 ►i 1 k4ust 26, 2010 respondents yet. I think we may have to take it upon ourselves, if it's possible, to gain access to the property with permission, just to put the panel back on. MR. LEFEBVRE: The property's currently vacant, so I don't think it's an issue now. MR. DEAN: Well, if the property's locked, it's an issue. You have to gain proper access to the property, with permission if it's locked. CHAIRMAN KELLY: If this goes past the 60 days, the county has the option to use the Collier County Sheriffs Office to assist in taking care of these issues and abating all the violations, correct? MS. FLAGG: Correct. CHAIRMAN KELLY: So we would have access at that time then. Okay. All right, we have a motion and a second. Is there any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All those in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR.ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Did you get that, Jean, the $200 a day, 60 days and the patched panel. MS. RAWSON: I got it. CHAIRMAN KELLY: All right, that concludes all of our hearings. Thank you, Mr. Mucha. Page 29 16 I lA ? , August 26, 2010 MR. MUCHA: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Under new business, we have the item of a new task force that's being created. I was asked by the Collier County Licensing Department to possibly ask for a volunteer from this board to sit on a new CAB, Citizen Advisory Board. MS. WALDRON: No, CAB is a different thing. This is just a task force for the vehicle for hire. It's more of a forum, not an actual board. CHAIRMAN KELLY: That would have been really funny, though, you know, if it's the limo for hire and the name of the board was the CAB. Anyways, so we need one person to help sit on that task force. MR. DOINO: I'll do it. CHAIRMAN KELLY: And it was specifically asked actually for somebody who is very familiar with that industry. And that was Mr. Marino, who happens to do that for a living. MR. DOINO: I do too. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Oh, do you as well? MR. LEFEBVRE: They both do. CHAIRMAN KELLY: I'm sorry. Well, in that case, it turns into a voting situation. So we have two nominations then? MR. KAUFMAN: Why don't we ask the two individuals who would like to serve first. CHAIRMAN KELLY: We have two of them. MR. MARINO: Yeah, I've been approached and volunteer to serve because I was chairman for the committee for the four years, so CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay. MR. DOING: I've been on the board, too. CHAIRMAN KELLY: You guys aren't making this easy. MR. KAUFMAN: Do you have any TV ads? Page 30 161182 - August 26, 2010 MR. DOINO: Anybody got a coin? MR. LEFEBVRE: How much money do you have to spend? MR. DEAN: Highest bidder? CHAIRMAN KELLY: All right, one at a time, one at a time. It turns it into a situation where we like literally would have to vote, unless one of you guys step down and just granted the seat. MR. LAVINSKI: And possibly we can just give it to whoever's been on this board the longest as a seniority issue. CHAIRMAN KELLY: We could do that, or we could submit both names and let the person on the task force decide. MR. DEAN: Good idea. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Maybe they'll need two seats to be filled and then you both get to serve. Would you please forward the two names and let Mike know that this is who the board would then support. Is that good? All right, let's call it to a vote and make sure we're going to forward these two names. All in favor of forwarding both people, signify by saying aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR.ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKL• Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Done. MR. LEFEBVRE: You might want to state the names. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Oh, I apologize. MR. DEAN: Go ahead, they'll fill it in. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Next on the agenda is the consent Page 31 r 16 1,1 26, 2i agenda, and there were three items that were being forwarded to the county attorney's office for foreclosures. That would be the Zonia Lambert Trust, Naples Property Services, LLC, and Guadalupe Campbell. And then under reports, Section 8, we have an attorney, who was here just a second ago and stepped out, that's going to give us a report on the Palm Lake LLC, which I believe is that mobile home park that we heard last month. And here he comes. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Because we have the investigator here, let's get her sworn in so that she can participate. (Speaker was duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Since we had asked for a report, if you want to go ahead and let us know what's transpired, we'd appreciate it. MR. ERICKSON: Okay. Here's -- it's about been about a month since our last meeting. We have dealt with everything in a general sort of way. And let me explain what has taken place. It's my understanding that the immediate electrical problems were resolved. And I spoke with Ms. Sorrels yesterday, and apparently the code enforcement is satisfied that those are taken care of. And additionally, we have applied for and I spoke with the electrician, I believe it's Jack Nipper of Coastal Electric I believe is who he's with, has sought and obtained -- he went -- and this is the type of problem that we're obviously going to be running into. He applied for a permit to correct all the electrical problems in the park and came back having to get 13 permits; 13 separate permits to get this done. It is my understanding he did just yesterday or the day before obtain the 13 permits. And so he's working on the electrical. And again, I point that out because very clearly in my mind the Page 32 161 A2 August 26, 2010 electrical is certainly the obligation of the park owner. We run into problems as we get into -- we also, as far as the litter in the park, we have been no -- we have notified the residents that we're cleaning up the litter and we are putting a dumpster out to collect the litter. And I believe we have until September 20th to get that corrected. And so my expectation is that that issue will be resolved by the September 20th. Again, that's clearly a park issue that does require cooperation with the residents, because a lot of the litter and abandoned items are on the residents' proper -- units and it belongs to them. But I think we should be able to work through that. I would like to point out to the board that coincidentally just about two weeks ago the State of Florida did their -- or I believe they come once or twice a year to inspect these parks. And I was kind of surprised that the inspector gave a bill of health to the park. Did have a few things such as -- you know, noted like four items: Debris behind unit 19, an old mattress at unit 12, an old couch at unit 57, beer cans at unit 57, and too much trash around the park. Those were the four items listed on this bill of health from I'll say a sister agency that inspects these parks. MR. KAUFMAN: So it wasn't a clean bill of health -- MR. ERICKSON: No it wasn't a -- MR. KAUFMAN: -- it was just a bill of health. MR. ERICKSON: Right, it's a bill of health, not a clean. But for this park, to walk away with this type -- with just these objections from the state, certainly it was satisfactory to us in that these things can be taken care of. And I point that out to note that obviously this is under the jurisdiction of the state health department and they are -- and they have routinely inspected it, and this is the type of things they found. MR. LEFEBVRE: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to inquire as to whether or not it's possible for this board to receive a copy of that. Page 33 16,1 1 pZ August 26, 2010 MR. ERICKSON: I have no objection providing a copy of it to the board. MR. LEFEBVRE: Thank you. MR. ERICKSON: The items that we -- the park manager has also notified -- and this is where it gets to the more serious problems. I have engaged the services of Rick McCullough, a general contractor, to assist us on this, and he and I went out and inspected the park last Saturday. And in the meantime, the park manager had gone around and spoken to I believe just about everybody in the park. He was given a list of the specific objections from code enforcement as to each unit that has to be addressed. And at that park, I'll bet you it's 75 percent of the units have been added onto within the last 15, 20 years. And it appears -- someone told me, I don't know if it's true, but there's been no permit pulled at this park for anything since the 1970's. And if that is in fact true, that means that everything that's been done at this park by the various residents has been done without a permit and is probably no great surprise to any of us. But that is what we're dealing with. The owner, he does -- he's English speaking, but he does have a person in the park who's his coordinator who's Spanish speaking and English speaking, is his translator and works apparently quite well at this stage, and he is communicating with the park people. But that is something that we see that there's -- this is going to be a big problem. And this is what we're going to be addressing more definitively in the next month is that we've -- we've got a couple problems here. One is that a lot of the people that were told of these things, several people are moving out. And that is a concern I have is whether these people first of all have the money to make the repairs and do what needs to be done. Basically what's being asked of these people is -- most of these people have turned -- the most common violation appears to be Page 34 161 1 A gust 26, 2010 converting a Florida room into a den or an actual living space room. And that's what's happened in most of these. So most of these people are actually being asked to take away about a third of their living space. And that's obviously going to be very problematic but something that we recognize has to be dealt with. MR. UESPERANCE: Are these tenants or are these owners? MR. ERICKSON: I don't know the -- my understanding, and this is a rough estimate, my expectation is we're going to find that about 50 percent of people in the park own their unit and maybe fifty percent rent. But that's a very speculative number on my part. But that's how I understand it to be along those lines. MR. UESPERANCE: Those that are moving out, are they tenants or are they owners? MR. ERICKSON: I believe they're mostly tenants. MR. ORTEGA: But there is an owner somewhere. MR. ERICKSON: We're talking -- you know what? Some of these things, there's -- some of these, apparently that's what the other issue which comes up September 20th also, is there's -- I believe there's about five RV's in the park that don't have licenses. Most of those nobody even knows who would apply for a license. These are RV's that people left at some point and vacated and just left the RV's behind is my understanding. MR. UESPERANCE: So your client is now the de facto owner of these particular units? MR. ERICKSON: De facto, but not legal. That's one of the issues that I've dealt with in the past as a lawyer is getting titles in these things. And every time I deal with it, I find it a very cumbersome process. And that's what we're going to be looking at next. MR. VESPERANCE: Is he renting these properties to tenants then? MR. ERICKSON: I'm not sure -- I don't know if he's just renting Page 35 16A1AL ' August 26, 2010 the lot rents, I'm not sure what the status is on that, who's renting what on that. I don't really have -- I haven't looked into that. But the other thing to keep in mind is that in all likelihood, you know, if this park were to shut down, probably less than five percent of the trailers would be moved out of the park. These are the type of things that cannot be moved. They've been there so long. I know, I was involved in the Greystone Park, and almost no trai -- that park was in much better shape than this park, and there was almost no trailers moved out of that park, because these things just simply can't be -- it simply can't be done. What I believe we are going to be doing, there are about, what I observed, about four or five trailers in the park, mobile homes, trailers, that are severely damaged, nobody living in them, and appear to be beyond repair. My suggestion is that those are the first ones we're going to address to try to get those cleared out. The park did -- I mean, when you walk around the park, it's a standard mobile home park. There's a -- Saturday afternoon there was a birthday party for kids going on in the park. I mean, if you would walk around, it looks like a typical neighborhood park, people coming and going. And so, I mean, there are people -- you know, definitely it's their home and has to be -- this has to be dealt with. So what we're looking at now is we are addressing it, each issue as they come up and as we're going along. My question of request to the board is that obviously it appears to me, as I was getting ready for this hearing and looking at it, I noticed that we've got several deadlines coming up September 20th, and then additional deadlines October 20th. And the board made it clear that they'd be receptive to requests for extensions of fines upon a proper showing. My expectation is I'm going to be coming before this board as these deadlines approach and giving a report similar to this report as to what's being done and to show that things are being done. And -- CHAIRMAN KELLY: If I may, may I stop you for just a Page 36 161 1 A e 4 August 26, 2010 moment? MR. ERICKSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN KELLY: The ones that are coming up here on the 20th of September, that's three days prior to our next meeting. So rather than going into violation, if we want to maybe look at those right now while we have the board here, if your GC wants to speak to the time frames that are needed, maybe we'll entertain an extension right now today so that you don't expire that time. It's easier to do it before than it is after. MR. ERICKSON: Okay. Well, the ones that the GC would be involved -- I think the ones that we have for September 20th is the tags. MR. KAUFMAN: Vehicles. MR. ERICKSON: Vehicle tags, which are -- the GC would not be involved with, and the litter. And that's really -- I believe those are the two -- let's see if we have a -- CHAIRMAN KELLY: Unfortunately I don't have a copy of the original order. MS. WALDRON: And Mr. Chair -- MR. ERICKSON: And the electrical. We have the electrical, the litter and the tags are the three that are coming up September 20th. MS. WALDRON: The way that we've done this in the past, it's okay if it's three days over their time frame, you can still give them that extension, you still have the authority to do that. And then we will have all the paperwork ready for you in front of you so you can look at it for the cases that they are requesting additional time for. Because they were multiple cases on this. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Excellent. MR. LEFEBVRE: I just would be very apprehensive at looking at extending it prior to the date, especially three plus weeks. This case, we did spend a lot of time on it and gave very careful thought on time frames, and definitely want to see some progress on the issues. Page 37 16 I 1 AL August 26, 2010 That's why we gave him 60 days, is to make sure that they do get this corrected. So we want to impress upon him that it is of extreme importance to get this corrected. MR. ORTEGA: I thought -- I could be wrong, but I thought we were giving an opportunity to come back to us and say well here's what we're doing, how much time we're going to need. CHAIRMAN KELLY: In a sense that's why I was asking. But Gerald, you make a very good point, we want to continue to keep the pressure on. We appreciate you being here, we appreciate the effort thus far and the fact that the 13 permits have been pulled. But when you mention birthday party, normal park, everybody coming and going and still having electrical problems that exist, that's what I believe's making the board a little nervous. MR. ERICKSON: I understand. CHAIRMAN KELLY: So you heard the comments. MR. ERICKSON: And I agree with Mr. Lefebvre, that's why I think it's appropriate to -- because we will make more progress by September, and so -- and obviously need to make more progress by September. And I don't know where that -- we just obtained the electrical permits yesterday, so I'm hopeful that the electrical will no longer be an issue. I'm hopeful that most of the stuff other -- I know the tags on the RV's are going to be an issue unresolved. And I'm not sure where we're going to be, but I don't mind having a deadline as of September 20th to have a have a finite plan as to that at this point. And at that time we will also have a better idea of where we're at with the unpermitted structures. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Investigator Sorrels, would you like to schedule a meeting prior to our next board meeting? It doesn't necessarily have to be with any representative, just maybe just a walk - through so you can give us an idea of the progress as well? 16 1 1A &ugUS 26, 2010 MS. SORRELS: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, great. Because I feel as though we may be asked for an extension of time. We want to see -- you know, we want something to gauge that by to see how much time is fair. MS. SORRELS: Okay, not a problem. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Sound good? MR. ERICKSON: Yeah, that's what I -- that's what I'm anticipating. That's what -- you know, my view on this in analyzing this situation is that closing down parks, you know, the statute requires if a park owner wants to close down the park, he has to provide the residents 60 days no -- or six months notice. The Florida legislature is very clear that, you know, mobile homes and these type of things have to be moved, you know, more gradually than just your typical landlord /tenant situation. And that's what I understand we're dealing with. And I understand that this is going to -- that this has to be dealt with by the owner. I don't know if we're going to be asking for assistance or some leeway or what leeway we're going to be asking for. I'm not prepared to ask for that yet. At some point I will be, and it may or may not be granted. But at this time I'm taking them step -by -step with these deadlines, and I think the deadlines remain appropriate and we certainly can continue living by them at this point. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Excellent. Any questions from the board? MR. DEAN: Let me make one quick comment. I understand what you're saying about six months, Florida statute and all that. But my concern as a board member is I don't like the electrical problem you had. There's a post there, if I remember from the last meeting, and you had exposed wires, and then you're telling me about a kid's birthday party. I don't care about the six months, I Page 39 16J 1 A2 August 26, 2010 care about that getting fixed. And that to me is a big issue. MR. ERICKSON: I understand. And that's why again I had no objection to the seven -day limitation on correcting the initial electrical problem. That obviously needed to be done. And hopefully when I come back here on the -- just after the 20th, the electrical will be all done. MS. SORRELS: Mr. Kelly, if I may? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Sure. MS. SORRELS: Just to reiterate what Mr. Erickson has already explained to you, just so I can confirm, I had made a site visit on 7/30 of 2010 and I did verify that the four immediate safety hazards concerning the electrical had been abated. The covers had been replaced on the disconnect switches that were exposed. The other two locations, one on the south side by the fence, they had actually taken the electrical, cut it off, capped it off properly and that way it's not exposed to anybody. And then the other one that's on the entrance on the left -hand side, it was kind of the same thing, wires were up out of the ground, no con -- it wasn't in the conduit, and those have been removed properly, capped off to where it would be no safety hazard to anyone. I also have spoken with Mr. Nipper with Coastal Electric. He did obtain his 13 permits to replace the plywood, the PVC and the four -by -fours on August 24, 2010. I have also -- in that conversation with Mr. Nipper, him and I agreed that once he had the permits issued, him and myself would meet on the property and make sure that we walked the property together to make sure all the electrical issues were addressed. MR. DEAN: Thank you. MS. SORRELS: You're welcome. MR. LEFEBVRE: Just a comment. You mentioned that you have to give six months notice for people to vacate the mobile home park if it was to be closed down. 16 ► 4,g u � 26, 2010 From last month, if I remember, there was no mention -- or I think I asked that question, does he intend to keep the use of the mobile home park, and that was a definite yes. MR. ERICKSON: I've spoken with him, and I think he's in the process of trying to sell the property. He sees this as a -- I mean, this is going to be -- we don't know whether this park can be brought up to code. MR. LEFEBVRE: Because that's not what -- I mean, if I remember, and correct me if I'm wrong, but the -- you were pretty adamant that no, he wants to keep this operational. MR. ERICKSON: Well, at this point he wants to keep it operational. Again, I think I was clear that I had not had extensive discussions with him at all as to what he wanted to do at that time. I've discussed more. But my understanding is he recognizes he's got a serious problem here that has to be dealt with, and he's got a mortgage on the property that has to be paid. So I mean, it's a difficult situation. But it obviously has to be addressed. Whether it's been left alone for too long, 15 years, whatever, there comes a time when it has to be addressed, and that is obviously now. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any further questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thank you for your time. Appreciate your report. See you next month. MR. ERICKSON: All right, thank you. MS. SORRELS: Thank you, gentlemen. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thanks. And if he was able to provide that copy of the Florida State report, if you could get that and just put it in with our packet next month. MR. ERICKSON: You want me to -- how do I get that copy to you? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Anything you submit now would Page 41 16 August 26, 2010 become evidence and you wouldn't retain a copy of it. So if you want to -- MR. ERICKSON: Okay. I'll just send it to the code enforcement. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Great. MS. WALDRON: She'll get it. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, great. Our next meeting is September 23rd, if there's no further discussion. MS. FLAGG: There is. Under -- let me just give you a quick report. The code enforcement foreclosures teams through this past Sunday, August 22nd. The costs that have been paid by the banks to abate code violations is now at $1.7 million that the banks have expended. And they have abated 1,318 code cases. The Blight Prevention Program just last week saved the county $14,800. So they're averaging between 10 to 20,000 every week that the foreclosure team is saving the county by not having to abate these code violations. In addition, the economic -- back in March of this year, the Collier County foreclosure task force made a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners -- made three recommendations. One of the three was to develop an economic recovery task force. What we realized as the foreclosure task force is that the first wave of the foreclosures that we were dealing with in Collier County were folks that perhaps overextended themselves, loans were coming due, they were secondary, you know, they had a primary but they were investors, etcetera. Now what we're seeing in terms of foreclosures is folks are losing their homes because they lost their job. The root cause of the foreclosures is job loss. So we as a community need to work together to identify what it's Page 42 16 1 1 A August 26, 2010 going to take to create jobs. So we've pulled together members of lots of different agencies, the county's economic development individual, the EDC members of the foreclosure task force, lots of different members of the community, to come together to form an economic recovery task force. There are multiple SWAT teams that have been identified for the task force. One is outgoing media messaging, and that -- the Chamber's working on that, along with the tourist development folks. So we have -- we've pulled lots of different agencies together. They're working -- they're going to be working on a video to go out to businesses nationally and internationally to talk about the successes that are occurring in Collier County. We've also developed a business identification SWAT team, and it's being broken down into subcommittees. One as job search initiative where we have an individual who is training people on how to transition to other jobs. A finance grant subcommittee, a business climate survey subcommittee, a cycling tour subcommittee, where they're going to be putting a cycling tour together and then marketing it to national and international companies to come to Naples for cycling. There's also a budget acceleration SWAT team, training for job SWAT team and a commercial retrofitting SWAT team. And actually that SWAT team has had -- because we were looking for quick successes, that SWAT team, led by Brad Schiffer, who's on the Planning Commission, he and his SWAT team have put together and, looked at the process for getting permits. As a result, there is a company that's going to come in and create between 100 and 120 new jobs. And the goal for the whole permitting process is to get them out in 15 business days. And they're making quite a bit of progress on that. So the way it worked it is the way it's supposed to work. The architect brought it to the business, to this SWAT team, the Page 43 1611A2 i August 26, 2010 commercial retrofitting SWAT team and say, hey, I've just been contacted, we have a project. And so the SWAT team got together, talked about it, and then they were assigned an individual to walk it through the permitting process. So it's a task force that is really focused on addressing the root cause of what we're facing in Collier County, which is job loss. Because as a result of job loss is the -- the end result is foreclosures. The bad news is we're approaching 20,000 foreclosures since January of 2008. We -- and if you're interested, I can have Jen fax you or e -mail you the most recent chart. Because we track that. We track the number of foreclosures that have been filed and we graft it out. And we're not seeing -- until we get jobs in Collier County, the foreclosures are going to continue. So we know that we have to address the job issue so that we can stop the foreclosure issue. That's it. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Do you have any questions of Diane? MR. DEAN: Very nice. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Very good. MR. ORTEGA: If I start now, it will never end. CHAIRMAN KELLY: That's awesome, it really is. Do you have any more information on that task force? Do we talk to Tammie at the EDC or -- MS. FLAGG: No, I can give you the information. The EDC is a very important partner, but we have multiple partners with the task force. And it's going in a lot of different areas. So any information that you need, we have the SWAT team listing and the chairs of each of the SWAT teams and what their particular mission is. And then we meet globally. All the SWAT teams and members come together and we meet once a month to go over progress. And we've had I believe two global meetings and a lot of progress has been made just in the two meetings, two months. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Excellent. 16 I lA L no August 26, 2010 All right, if there's any other comments -- MR. DEAN: Motion to adjourn. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Motion to adjourn. MS. WALDRON: I have one thing. The September 23rd meeting will be at the growth management planning and regulation, which is 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, in conference room 609 -610. MR. UESPERANCE: You sign these? MR. DEAN: I have a motion. MS. WALDRON: If anyone has their -- MR. LAVINSKI: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. ORTEGA: Aye. MR. LAVINSKL• Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Opposed? (No response.) Page 45 161 1 A6 `4 August 26, 2010 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10:12 a.m. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD KE KELLY, Chairman These minutes approved by the board on presented or as corrected as Transcript prepared on behalf of Gregory Reporting Service, Inc., by Cherie' R. Nottingham. ffim 161 1A2 w September 23, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE - ` CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD RECEIVED Naples, Florida NOV 2 9 2010 September 23, 2010 Board of County rommissioners LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Code Enforcement Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Kenneth Kelly Larry Dean (Excused) Ron Doino Robert Kaufman James Lavinski Gerald Lefebvre Lionel L'Esperance Ccyl� iotetka- �- Tony Marino Herminio Ortega (Excused) ALSO PRESENT: Jean Rawson, Attorney for the Board Diane Flagg, Code Enforcement Director Jen Waldron, Code Enforcement Specialists, Torres. Page l Item 1b 1 1 44 September 23, 2010 CHAIRMAN KELLY: Good morning. I'd like to call the Code Enforcement Board meeting to order for September, 2010. Notice: The respondents may be limited to 20 minutes of case presentation, unless additional time is granted by the board. Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item will receive up to five minutes, unless the time is adjusted by the Chair. All parties participating in the public hearing are asked to observe Roberts Rules of Order and speak one at a time so that the court reporter can record all statements being made. Any person wishing to decide -- or decides to appeal a decision of the board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Neither Collier County nor the Code Enforcement Board shall be responsible for providing this record. May I have roll call, please. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Ken Kelly? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Robert Kaufman? MR. KAUFMAN: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Gerald Lefebvre? MR. LEFEBVRE: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. James Lavinski? MR. LAVINSKI: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Lionel L'Esperance? MR. UESPERANCE: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Ron Doino? MR. DOINO: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Tony Marino? MR. MARINO: Here. MS. WALDRON: Mr. Herminio Ortega has an excused absence, Page 2 epl� 1 eritber 23, 2010 as well as Mr. Larry Dean. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Great, thank you. Are there any changes to the agenda? MS. WALDRON: Yes, there are. Under letter B, stipulations, we have three stipulations. The first will be Case CESD20090000870, Richard Mercer, Jeffrey Mercer and Amy Mercer. The second will be CESD200010000715, Alvin E. Weeks and Elizabeth Hanna Handapangoda. And number three will be CESD20100007087, VLDC, LLC. Under letter C, hearings, number three, Case CESD20090010435, Kenny Blocker and Barbara Blocker, has been withdrawn. Number four, Case CESD20090010457, Kenny Blocker and Barbara Blocker, has been withdrawn. Number five, Case CELU20100003428, Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc., has been withdrawn. Number six, Case CESD20100003601, Ignacio Soto, has been withdrawn. And that is all the changes that I have. CHAIRMAN KELLY: How about a motion to accept the agenda. MR. KAUFMAN: Motion to accept the agenda. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Do we have a second? MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Seconded from Mr. Lefebvre. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. 16j,;1 A2 i September 23, 2010 MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKL• Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) MR. LEFEBVRE: Mr. Kelly? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Agenda's approved. MR. LEFEBVRE: Just as a point of reference, due to the fact that there's two regular members that are out, the alternate members have full voting rights, correct? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Right, both alternates do have full voting rights today. Very good. Thank you, Gerald. Also, we'll move on now to the approval of the minutes from our hearing August 26th, 2010. Are there any changes? MR. KAUFMAN: I have a question on the minutes. It was asked at another board meeting, as a matter of fact. If there are typos in the minutes, do they need to be corrected, or -- obvious typos. MS. WALDRON: I don't believe that the typos need to be corrected. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Are we talking about spelling or -- MR. KAUFMAN: No, used a different word. But it's an obvious. When you read it, you know what the correct word is. If I didn't mark the minutes up, but I did read them. MS. WALDRON: I can find out for sure, but I don't believe that they need to be corrected. MR. KAUFMAN: Okay, thanks. CHAIRMAN KELLY: In that case, is there an approval of the minutes? MR. KAUFMAN: Make a motion we approve the minutes. im 16 eptuer L3, �i o MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Motion and second. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKL• Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: And the ayes have it. The minutes are approved. Moving on to four, public hearings /motions. We have a motion for an extension of time from Fidel and Esperanza Alviar. Are the respondents here? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: No. We have a letter in our packet. Looks like they're asking for more time. And according to the letter, it looks like it's a three -month extension. (Speaker was duly sworn.) MS. RODRIGUEZ: Good morning. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Hi, good morning. MS. RODRIGUEZ: They are not here today. The gentleman said that he couldn't make it because he had issues with leaving work regularly and he didn't want to get fired. But he is asking for a three -month extension. We have no objections. Page 5 16 I 1 ow I �� September 23, 2010 The permit is in ready status with the permitting department, but he has not been able to gather the thousand dollars that they're charging him for the permit. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Do you want to state your name for the record, just for Cherie'. MS. RODRIGUEZ: For the record, Maria Rodriguez, Collier County Code Enforcement. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thank you. MR. KAUFMAN: Can you tell us the nature of the violation? MS. RODRIGUEZ: It is a roof over a mobile home, and it's got an extension, which is going to be like a shed. We're going to keep the washer and dryer in there. MR. KAUFMAN: I have a question regarding the letter that was written. It says that most of the work has been done, but they haven't gotten a permit. Which is in essence the same violation that they have. MS. RODRIGUEZ: It's permit by affidavit. The permit is by affidavit so the engineering and everything is good, it's in ready status. They've already looked at it. So once he gets the permit, all he has to do is take the paperwork to the structural people and they'll sign off and it's C.O.'d. So the engineer is saying that it is built to code. MR. LEFEBVRE: And I would assume that their date was August 24th that it was supposed to be corrected by. MS. RODRIGUEZ: Correct. MR. LEFEBVRE: And I would assume that they're asking for three months from today. MS. RODRIGUEZ: Correct. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any further discussion? MR. LEFEBVRE: I make a motion to approve. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Motion to approve. Do we have a second? MR. KAUFMAN: Second. 161 1 A2 September 23, 2010 CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All those in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: And they have a three -month extension from today. Great, thank you very much. Next case is going to be a motion for extension of time for Daysi Falcon, Caridad Jimenez and Barbara Jimenez. (Speaker was duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, this one, it looks like they have decided to not seek further permits or approval to keep the addition. Instead they'd rather demolish it. And they're asking for six months to finish the demolition and remove all the debris from the property. MS. RODRIGUEZ: She had originally planned to permit it, but once she got the engineer to go look at it to permit by affidavit, because it was already an addition to the house, it required a lot of fixing, because it wasn't up to code. And in order to do that, of course it was going to be very expensive. So they decided to demo it. But because she ran out of time, now she's asking for another extension to remove the addition. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Does the county have any objections to the additional time? MS. RODRIGUEZ: We have no objection. There's no one Page 7 16 I „l . 4Z , September 23, 2010 living in the addition. It's vacant. MR. KAUFMAN: This thing was extended the last meeting, wasn't it? MS. RODRIGUEZ: Yes, it was, it was extended the last time she came. Because at the time she wasn't sure, yes, no, yes, no. Well, she finally got the engineer to go. They did ask her when she came in the last time whether she needed more time, and she thought that she was going to have it permitted by then. But then once she started seeing that it was too expensive, she said I can't do it, it's too much. MR. KAUFMAN: Was the $80.86 paid? MS. RODRIGUEZ: Yes, it's paid. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any further discussion? MR. LEFEBVRE: They're looking for 180 days. I think that might be a little bit excessive, considering that she had -- is it nine months so far? The original order. We gave her three months back in June, and I'm looking to see what the original order was. The original order was I think six months. So we'd be going on 15 plus months. So I think that another 180 days would be excessive. I think three months would be sufficient. MR. KAUFMAN: It looks like the last extension was 90 days. MR. LEFEBVRE: Right, but prior to that I think we gave her six months to have it fixed originally, or come into compliance. I make a motion that we extend for 90 days, not 180 days. MR. UESPERANCE: I'll second that motion. CHAIRMAN KELLY: We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All those in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. lb I 1 September 23, 2010 MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: days. Any opposed? Okay, it looks like it's going to be 90 MS. RODRIGUEZ: Okay. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Very good. Thank you, Maria. Okay, we're finished with the motions. Now we move to B, stipulations. The first case is going to be Mercer, and that is CESD20090000870. And I don't see the respondent here. (Speaker was duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Good morning, Mr. Mucha. MR. MUCHA: Good morning. For the record, Joe Mucha, Collier County Code Enforcement. I met with Richard Mercer this morning, and he was here on behalf of himself and representing Jeffrey Mercer and Amy Mercer. He agreed that he was in violation of Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Section 10.02.06(B)(1)(a), described as an unpermitted alteration to an existing storage building. He has agreed to pay operational costs in the amount of $81.15 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days of this hearing and to abate all violations by: Obtaining all required inspections and a certificate of completion/occupancy for permit 2010070951 by December 23rd, 2010, or a fine of $200 a day until violation is abated. Respondent must notify code enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the investigator perform a site Page 9 16 1.1 AC. September 23, 2010 inspection to confirm compliance. That if the respondent fails to abate the violation, the county may abate the violation and may use the assistance of the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of this agreement, and all costs of abatement shall be assessed to the property owner. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Is there any questions from the board? MR. KAUFMAN: I make a motion we accept the stipulation as written. CHAIRMAN KELLY: We have a motion. Do we have a second? MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. Motion and a second. All in favor? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKL• Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Very good. It's approved. MR. MUCHA: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thank you. The next stipulation is going to be for the Miller Weeks residence. That is case CESD200100000715. (Speaker was duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Hi. Page 10 L ,'j Septembers 2�, 2610 MS. McGONAGLE: Good morning. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Want to state your name for the record? MS. McGONAGLE: Michele McGonagle, Collier County Code Enforcement. THE COURT REPORTER: Could you spell your last name, please? MS. McGONAGLE: M- C- G- O- N- A- G -L -E. I met with Elizabeth Hanna Handapangoda on September 21 st in the office. And she was also representing her father, Alvin Weeks. She agreed that they're in violation, and we entered into a stipulation agreement. The stipulation is that they will pay operational costs in the amount of $80.29 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days of the hearing and abate all the violations by: Obtaining Collier County building permits, inspections and certificate of completion for the mentioned construction and alterations to the structure, or obtain a demolition permit, inspections, certificate of completion and demolition of the structure within 120 days of this hearing or a fine of $200 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains. Also, that she must notify the code enforcement department within 24 hours of abatement of the violation, request the investigator to perform a site inspection and confirm compliance. If the respondent fails to abate the violation, the county may abate the violation and may use the assistance of the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of this agreement, and all costs of abatement shall be assessed to the property owner. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Could you briefly describe what construction work is being done? MS. McGONAGLE: They actually -- I have a couple pictures, if you'd like to see them. CHAIRMAN KELLY: I'd rather not enter them into evidence. But, I mean, are they -- Page 11 161 1 A2 September 23, 2010 MS. McGONAGLE: Okay, that's fine. CHAIRMAN KELLY: --just building an addition or are they enclosing -- MS. McGONAGLE: No, actually the house is in very bad disrepair. And it has what looks like an old metal roof that used to be on there. And they have constructed four -by -fours on either side of the building, and it looks like they're trying to construct a roof -over. Once she came into the office and realized that she would not be able to get it permitted, she actually stated that she is planning on getting a demolition permit. I was advised that she came into the office this morning and has already paid the operational costs, and she plans on applying for the demo permit as well today. But because it was so early, that's not happened yet. But she does plan on doing the demolition part of the stipulation. MR. KAUFMAN: Do you have the documentation that she was able to represent her father, or was that -- MS. WALDRON: She did sign on behalf on the stipulation of her father. MR. UESPERANCE: The next question I have is do we need some type of an affidavit that says she is that person? I notice there was a name change. MS. WALDRON: She did inform us that she has her marriage certificate if we need to see it. CHAIRMAN KELLY: And the original deed was in both of their names anyway, so -- MR. UESPERANCE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thanks for the description, it helps us get an understanding as to what the scope of the work is. Because we want to be able to judge whether 120 days is enough time to get it done. MS. McGONAGLE: Right. Page 12 16 1 1 A2 September 23, 2010 CHAIRMAN KELLY: That's why I had asked. Any other questions from the board? MR. KAUFMAN: I make a motion we accept the stipulation as written. CHAIRMAN KELLY: MR. DOING: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. Motion. Do we have a second? Seconded by Ron. All those in favor? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKL• Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, 120 days. Thanks very much. MS. McGONAGLE: You're welcome. CHAIRMAN KELLY: And the last stipulation we have is VLDC, LLC. That's Case No. CESD20100007087. And it is a new case so we need to swear you in again. (Speaker was duly sworn.) MS. McGONAGLE: Again for the record, Michele McGonagle, Code Enforcement. I met -- on -site I had made a site visit yesterday and I met with the registered agent, Vincent Lamanna. We discussed the violation. There is a violation of a mezzanine that was built after the final C.O. of the original building permit. He agreed that there is a Page 13 161 1 A2 September 23, 2010 violation. He agreed to sign the stipulation. And I have the stipulation agreement here. Violation noted is in reference to Collier County Code 2004 -41, as amended, Section 10.02.06(B)(1)(a), and 10.02.06(B)(1)(e)(i). A loft, mezzanine, stairs were added, and electrical in the showroom have been constructed without first obtaining all required Collier County building permits. Mr. Lamanna has agreed to pay the operational costs in the amount of $80.86 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days of the hearing, and abate all violations by: Obtaining all required building permits, inspections and certificate of completion for the unpermitted structure and electric, or obtain the demolition permit, inspections, certificate of completion and demolish the structures and electrical, returning the building to its original permitted state within 150 days of this hearing or a fine of $200 per day will be imposed. That the respondent must notify code enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the respondent fails to abate the violation, the county may abate the violation and may use the assistance of the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of this agreement, and all costs of abatement shall be assessed to the property owner. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Are there any questions from the board? MR. KAUFMAN: I have a question on the electrical. Did they add an outlet or panel chain? MS. McGONAGLE: There's looks like little puff lights that were put underneath the mezzanine. The mezzanine was constructed and then underneath they have a desk and there's just can lights and then like the little puck -type lights under there. And he also stated that he's already had a general contractor come and -- who is also an engineer. And he has come and looked at the mezzanine and he doesn't feel it's going to be a problem with Page 14 1611 Q September 23,2010" doing a permit by affidavit for the structure. But he asked for 150 days because he's also working on another property. So he's -- it's more the money thing than anything else. That's why he requested the 150 days. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: I'll entertain a motion. MR. KAUFMAN: Motion to accept the stipulation as written. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Motion and a second. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOING: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) And it carries, 150 days. Thank you. MS. McGONAGLE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KELLY: That's the end of our stipulations. We now move into letter C, hearings. The first hearing is going to be Joseph and Maria Ranghelli. (Speaker was duly sworn.) MS. WALDRON: This is in reference to violation of Ordinance Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22, Building and Building Regulations, Article 6, Property Maintenance Code, Page 15 161 1 Ae 4 September 23, 2010 Section 22 -231, Subsection 15. Description of violation: Dirty green pool. Location/address where violation exists: 11169 Longshore Way West, Naples, Florida, 34119. Folio 56101040007. Name and address of owner /person in charge of violation location: Joseph and Maria Ranghelli, 11169 Longshore Way West, Naples, Florida, 34119. Date violation first observed: June 9th, 2010. Date owner /person in charge given notice of violation: July 19th, 2010. Date on /by which violation to be corrected: August 9th, 2010. Date of reinspection: August 17th, 2010. Results of reinspection: The violation remains. MR. LETOURNEAU: Good morning. For the record, Jeff Letourneau, Collier County Code Enforcement. This is in reference to Code Case No. CEPM 20100007867. Violation is located at 11169 Longshore Way North, Naples, Florida. NOV service was completed with posting of the property in the courthouse on July 19th, 2010. I'd like to submit one piece of evidence as a photograph today for this case. MR. KAUFMAN: Motion to accept. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Motion and second. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. Page 16 161 1 A2 I September 23, 2010 MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Carries. MR. LETOURNEAU: This is the original picture I took when I went out there first on June 9th. I went out there because we had an anonymous complaint. On that date I observed a vacant property and a pool in this condition. Since that time we've had numerous inspections, on -site inspections. I've been unable to make contact with the owners after numerous attempts. And as of yesterday, I went out, the property remains in violation and vacant. On my last check, there has been no lis pendens filed. So I'm not really sure where these people are at. It's in a gated community, so I believe the actual property's being maintained by the association, but the pool remains in bad condition. MR. KAUFMAN: Does the pool also smell? MR. LETOURNEAU: I haven't really been that close, I've just been outside the screen and looked in it. I imagine it does, though. It's in a little bit worse condition today than it was during that picture. MR. UESPERANCE: The pool appears to be secure; the screen door's closed, there's no danger of children falling in? MR. LETOURNEAU: No change of that, no. Just have a violation of a dirty pool. MR. KAUFMAN: Make a motion that we find them in violation. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Motion and a second. Any discussion? Page 17 lei 1 AZ September 23, 2010 (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All those in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: There is a violation. And does the county have a recommendation? MR. LETOURNEAU: We do. The county recommends that the Code Enforcement Board orders the respondent to pay all operational costs in the amount of $80.86 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days, and abate all violations by: One, chemically treating the pool water, killing the algae growth and maintaining the filtration system to keep the pool water clean, and providing bi- weekly treatment within "X" days of this hearing or a fine of "X" a day will be imposed for each day the violation continues. Alternatively, the respondent may chemically treat the pool water, killing the algae growth and cover the pool using HUD standards to prevent any intrusion of rainwater within "X" days of this hearing or a fine of "X" a day will be imposed for each day the violation continues. The respondent must notify the code enforcement investigator when the violation has been abated in order to conduct a final inspection to confirm abatement. If the respondent fails to abate the violation, the county may Page 18 lb 1 1A2 September 23, 2010 abate the violation and may use the assistance of the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of this order, and all costs of the abatement shall be assessed to the property owner. MR. KAUFMAN: I have a question. Do you know whether or not the electricity to the house is turned on or not? MR. LETOURNEAU: I do not know that. I didn't check the meter, so I'm not sure. I believe it's not going on in the pool, though, because obviously if it was, we wouldn't be in this situation. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Would anyone like to try a motion on this one? MR. KAUFMAN: I'll try one. The 80.86 is paid within 30 days. The fine is $100 per day and they have 60 days to -- when the fines start accruing. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay. To clarify the motion, we're going to accept the county's recommendation with $100 per day and 60 days on both areas, correct, one and two? MR. KAUFMAN: Yes. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Do we have a second? MR. UESPERANCE: Second. MR. LAVINSKI: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Which one? It's either Jim or -- MR. UESPERANCE: I will defer. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, Mr. Lavinski got it. Any discussion? MR. LEFEBVRE: Yes. I think 60 days is an extremely long time to treat a pool. I mean, you could call up a company to come out there within a few days. I think a time period of seven days would be much better than 60 days. CHAIRMAN KELLY: I concur with Gerald. I think it's pretty Page 19 161 1 A2 i September 23, 2010 easy to find a pool maintenance guy to go out. I wasn't going to say seven, I was going to say closer to 30 days. But I agree, I think 60 days is too long. Any other discussion? MR. KAUFMAN: I'll amend my motion to show 30 days, if it pleases the board and the second. MR. LAVINSKL• I'll amend. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay. So we have an amended and a second to 30 days. Any discussion on the 30 days? MR. UESPERANCE: Twenty- seven. CHAIRMAN KELLY: No, I think -- you said 30 days? MR. KAUFMAN: Thirty. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thirty days. MR. UESPERANCE: Oh, 30, okay. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thirty days. Okay, any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All those in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: And it carries unanimously. Thirty days and $100 per day. MR. LETOURNEAU: Thank you very much. MS. WALDRON: Just for clarification, you're doing 30 days on Page 20 SL A� eptem ep er 23, 2010 both one and two, correct? CHAIRMAN KELLY: Correct. And just out of curiosity, are we getting property maintenance stuff now? MS. WALDRON: No, this case fell into -- in between hearings and we didn't want to wait until the next special magistrate hearing. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Very good. Thank you. Next case would be our last under hearings. It's going to be Case number nine (sic) versus Daniel Guerrero. It's CESD20090015950. Welcome back. (Speaker was duly sworn.) MS. WALDRON: This is in reference to violation of ordinance Collier County Code of Laws, Chapter 22, Article 2, Section 22 to 26 -139 104.5.1.4.4. Description of the violation: Permit 2008120281 expired on June 3rd, 2009 before receiving a certificate of completion. Location/address where violation exists: 3240 Caledonia Avenue, Naples, Florida. Folio 61780440000. Name and address of owner /person in charge of violation location: Daniel H. Guerrero, P.O. Box 9805, Naples, Florida, 34101. Date violation first observed: October 6th, 2009. Date owner /person in charge given Notice of Violation: October 7th, 2009. Date on/by which violation to be corrected: November 5th, 2009. Date of reinspection: August 6th, 2010. Results of reinspection: The violation remains. MS. McGONAGLE: Good morning, again. For the record, Michele McGonagle, Code Enforcement. Per service, Notice of Violation was sent certified and first class mail on October 6th, 2009 and was posted at the property and the courthouse on October 7th, 2009. I would now like to present case evidence with an exhibit of one Page 21 16 I, 1 A2 September 23, 2010 photo. CHAIRMAN KELLY: All of them together? MS. McGONAGLE: It's just one photo. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay. MR. KAUFMAN: Motion to accept. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Do we have a second? MR. DOlNO: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Second is by Ron. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) MS. McGONAGLE: The violation was first observed on October 6th, 2009 while researching the property on another case. It was observed that Permit No. 2008120281 had expired without obtaining a certificate of completion. The notice of violation was prepared and mailed and posted. On October 13th, 2009 the owner reapplied and Permit No. 2009100700 was issued on October 23rd, 2009. A reinspection on November 5th of 2009 showed that the 10 -day spot survey was completed on October 26th, 2009. The property has been checked numerous times and no further permit inspections have been made, and there has been no contact Page 22 1 A� September 23, 2010 from the property owner. On May 13th, 2010, CDPlus was checked and Permit No. 2009100700 had expired on April 21st, 2010 with no new inspections and no new permit had been applied for. A lis pendens was filed on the property in January of 2010. The case was prepared for hearing on August 11th, 2010. I made a site visit yesterday and observed that the property is vacant. I also checked CD Plus and found that there are no current permits for the property, and the violation remains. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any questions for the investigator? MR. KAUFMAN: What was the permit for originally? MS. McGONAGLE: For building the home. MR. KAUFMAN: In other words, it was to build a brand new house? MS. McGONAGLE: Yes. There's actually a permit -- the 2008 permit was a reapplied permit. The original one was 2007051163. And they reapplied, got the 2008 permit. Then they reapplied for that one, got the 2009. Then that one has expired in April. MR. KAUFMAN: And there's been no contact with the owner of the property? MS. McGONAGLE: Correct. When trying to contact the person with the -- we have a phone number on record from the permit application. And when calling that phone number, a lady answered and said that there was no one there by the name of the homeowner. MR. KAUFMAN: I mean, I hate to -- this sounds morbid, but in a case like this, I mean, somebody could be inside the house laying on the floor for all we know, since nobody's contacted them and nothing's happened in a year. MS. McGONAGLE: Somebody is up- keeping the property, as you can see from the photo. It is being kept. And from what I have found with reviewing this case, other Page 23 161 1AZ September 23, 2010 investigators have gone to the property and there has been activity there. Different times they've noticed different things under the carport where materials -- it's obvious that work has been going on. It's just that they haven't called in for any further inspections or anything. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any other questions? MR. LEFEBVRE: How far along are they in the permitting process? I mean, at what stage have they had permits -- MS. McGONAGLE: The 10 -day spot survey is the only thing that's been done, and that was back in October. MR. LEFEBVRE: So none of the electrical, plumbing, any of that has been completed? MS. McGONAGLE: Correct. MR. LEFEBVRE: When -- from looking inside, can you see if it's sheet - rocked or dry- walled or -- MS. McGONAGLE: I didn't look inside. MR. LEFEBVRE: Doesn't look like a new building, that's -- CHAIRMAN KELLY: I'll entertain a motion -- MS. McGONAGLE: It may be a remodel. This wasn't originally my case so I didn't actually open the case. I know originally that the case that they were there investigating was litter all over the property, and that has since, as you can see, been abated. And this may actually be a remodel or -- I just know what the permits are telling me. That -- MR. LEFEBVRE: Right. When was the original case opened for the litter? Was it prior to a permit being pulled? MS. McGONAGLE: For the litter? MR. LEFEBVRE: Yeah. Just curious. MS. McGONAGLE: On October 6th is when they were there checking on the litter, of 2009. I don't know when that actual case was opened. But at that time is when this violation was noticed. And then right after they received the Notice of Violation is when they reapplied for the new permit. So somebody's getting the Page 24 16 1 1 Z September 23, 2010 notices, they just aren't contacting our office. MR. KAUFMAN: I'd like to make a motion that we find them in violation. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Motion and a second. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOING: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKL• Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: There is a violation. Does the county have a recommendation? MS. McGONAGLE: Yes, we do. The county recommends that the Code Enforcement Board orders the respondent to pay all operational costs in the amount of $80.86 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days and abate all violations by: Obtain a valid Collier County building permit, inspections and certificate of completion for the mentioned alterations and additions; or obtain a demolition permit, inspections, certificate of completion and remove all unpermitted alterations /additions, returning the structure to its original permitted state within "X" days of this hearing, or a fine of "X" dollars per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains. The respondent must notify the code enforcement investigator Page 25 161 1A2 September 23, 2010 when the violation has been abated in order to conduct a final inspection to confirm abatement. If the respondent fails to abate the violation, the county may abate the violation and may use the assistance of the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of this order. And all costs of abatement shall be assessed to the property owner. MR. KAUFMAN: I have a question of the county. Has -- do we know which bank filed the lis pendens in January? MS. McGONAGLE: I'm sorry, I don't. MR. KAUFMAN: Does the county? MS. FLAGG: We can find out from the foreclosure team. MR. KAUFMAN: And before we impose a fine, is there any suggestion that we have -- since it is in lis pendens, maybe in contacting the bank and putting it as part of the program that we have? MS. FLAGG: Right. The bank -- the foreclosure team would already have the case. They work the cases parallel. So the foreclosure team would be contacting the bank. One of the things, and I'll go over it in the report, but one of the things that we're seeing is there's a little bit of a transition. So when the bank isn't acting, we're moving quicker to put something on the record so that the bank can't pass the property with the code violation onto a new buyer. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thank you. Would someone like to take a stab at the number of days and the dollar amount? MR. KAUFMAN: I'll take a shot at it. The 80.86 paid within 30 days. $200 a day fine, commencing in 60 days. I don't know if that's too long a period of time, but it seems reasonable. And since the team is working on it, I think this will be resolved probably via the team rather than any other way. CHAIRMAN KELLY: All right, we have a motion, do we have a second? 16! 1 A2 a September 23, 2010 MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Seconded. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All those in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: Okay, we accept the county's recommendation, 60 days with $200 per day, to fill in the blanks. And I hope that will get it done for you. MS. McGONAGLE: Okay, thank you. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Thank you. That's the end of our hearings. Now we're moving on to number five, old business. We just have one case. Motion for imposition of fines /liens. This would be Case No. CESD200090018220. Edward and Tammy Harris. (Speaker was duly sworn.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: A reminder to the board, there was an additional affidavit of noncompliance placed in front of you this morning that was not a part of our original packet. MR. PAUL: Good morning. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Good morning. This is an imposition, so if you want to just read it in, that would be great. Page 27 bA2 t mb1 Se r MR. PAUL: For the record, Renald Paul, Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator. This is CEB Case No. CESD20090018220, Board of County Commissioners versus Edward M. Jr. and Tammy Harris. Violations of Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Sections 10.02.06(B)(1)(a). Location: 5730 Cedar Tree Lane, Naples, Florida, 34116. Folio 38228880003. Description: Addition of fence, four sheds, metal carport, a canopy, lanai, wooden deck and pool with no permits. Past orders on March 25th, 2010. The Code Enforcement Board issued a finding of fact, conclusion of law and order. The respondent was found in violation of the referenced ordinances and ordered to correct the violation. See the attached Order of the Board OR 4563, Page 1876 for more information. The respondent has not complied with the CEB orders as of September 23rd, 2010. The fines and costs to date are described as the following: Order item one and three, fines at a rate of $200 per day for the period between May 25th, 2010 and September 23rd, 2010, 122 days, for the total of $24,400. Fines continue to accrue. Order item number two and four, fines at a rate of $200 per day for the period between September 22nd, 2010 and September 23rd, 2010, two days, for the total of $400. Fines continue to accrue. Order item number seven, operational costs of $80.57 have not been paid. Total amount to date, $24,880.57. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Are there any questions from the board? MR. KAUFMAN: Have you had any contact with the respondents? MR. PAUL: No, I have not. They are still residing at the residence. I haven't had any contact. They haven't applied for any permits or anything. They've done nothing. •,,. 4pleler A2 23, 2010 MR. LEFEBVRE: Make a motion to impose the fine. MR. KAUFMAN: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Motion and second. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: All those in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. UESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOING: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKL• Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: The fines will be imposed. MR. PAUL: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KELLY: That's the end of our hearings. Now on to the consent agenda. There was nothing listed there. Any reports? MS. FLAGG: Yes. Let me give you some code enforcement department stats. Just last week we had 248 new cases open, just in that one week. There were in that week 569 property inspections. 98 cases were closed with voluntary compliance. And then there were I I I lien search requests. Remember those are when someone's buying they'll make a request to find out if there's any open code cases or any code issues. So there were 111 requests last week for those. Each investigator is carrying an average of 54 code cases. So the Blight Prevention Program with the foreclosure teams, through last week the banks have expended $1,740,554 in abating Page 29 x.61 1 A2 September 23, 2010 code violations in our community. They've abated 1,384 code violations. I will tell you that the number of abatements by the county, however, has increased four times the amount. And the reason why is there is -- we're seeing a transition in the banks. The banks are now not filing lis pendens. And I believe that this may have something to do with the upcoming election. We're starting to see transition. So once they file a lis pendens, the foreclosure team can make contact with the bank. And as you remember, when they file a lis pendens, then it could be a year or two or longer before the bank takes title. But the banks have been working with us to abate at the point of filing a lis pendens. What we're starting to see is an increased number of properties where, like the one that you just saw, where they have left the property but there's no lis pendens filed on the property. MR. KAUFMAN: I have a question. Why would they do that if the fines continue to accrue? It's a case of you're going to pay me now or you're going to pay me later. MS. FLAGG: That is why we are -- we've now been watching this trending. And what we're doing is you're going to do start seeing some cases come to you that normally the banks would have handled because they would have filed a lis pendens. But we can't contact the banks until they file a lis pendens because that tells us they have an interest in the property. So at this point what we're doing is if the bank isn't filing a lis pendens, then we're abating and we're going to be bringing these cases. Because the other thing that we need to make sure of is that when a new buyer comes in to buy the property, there needs to be something on the record so that we don't have a new buyer come in and buy a piece of property with code violations and /or fines on a property and them not know about it in the event they didn't do a code lien search. Page 30 16 1 1 A2 September 23, 2010 So we watch this very closely. We watch the trending both nationally and locally. And then we're just monitoring what we need to do to make sure that we're doing the best we can to protect the new buyers and also the community members to assure that there's not blight. So that's where we're at now is there was just in last week, the individual that does the nuisance abatements had hundreds of nuisance abatement requests to address. So we'll see what happens. But that's why we're at right now. Until the bank files the lis pendens, we're not going to leave blight in the community. We'll go ahead and address it, put it on the property and then if the bank does file the lis pendens and proceed and /or short sale, then they'll be responsible for the property. The only thing that we continue to tell our community members, if you are going to buy a foreclosed property, please make sure that you do a code lien search and a code property inspection so that you know what you're buying before you buy the property. Because once you buy the property and you take title to the property, you're going to own everything that is on that property, including the fines and the responsibility. Now, again our process hasn't changed in regard to that, that once they come into compliance, then we bring them back to you if they haven't been imposed. And obviously with your decision, but we would recommend that the fines be waived once the property has been brought into compliance. CHAIRMAN KELLY: I have a question. It would be interesting to see, out of the 111 code lien property searches that you've performed in the last week or requested in the last week, how many of those actually had some kind of violation on them. MS. FLAGG: We can bring that back to you. That's something that we can start tracking. But quite a few of them do. I can't give you a percentage right now, but we've seen that quite a few of them Page 31 161 1 q2 September 23, 2010 do. MR. UESPERANCE: Less than 50 percent? MS. FLAGG: I don't want to give you a bad number. I'm bringing it back next time. MR. KAUFMAN: I was wondering if there could be something that would be helpful that the county has limited resources to abate anything if they would handle it in a similar fashion to tax stamps, where that could be offered for someone to pay, knowing there's a lien on the property, et cetera, to help finance the abatement process. MS. FLAGG: Well, anything that we expend to abate is returned. So when -- no matter what, to release the property the hard costs have to be paid. So we track -- anything that is expended we track, and that is paid. So -- and this is a -- we're seeing this in the last couple of months, this transition to not even file the lis pendens. So maybe after November that will change; we don't know. But that's -- what our primary goal is is not to allow blight to move into our community, because we have to have a community that is sound so that we can encourage economic growth. I will also tell you that we continue to encourage community members to either call the code number at 252 -2440, or go on the website, Colliergov.net /code, and report violations, because that helps the investigators. The investigators right now are carrying over 50 cases apiece, and each case takes a lot of time to work. So when the community members help us by calling in the violations and letting us know where the violations are, then they can just do the research associated with working the case and get the case moving. So we continue to ask our community members to help us by telling us -- you know, calling in and telling us what properties need to be addressed. The community task force teams are still doing a great job, they continue to meet every week with the community members, HOA's, Page 32 161 1 A September 23, 2010 property owners associations, Sheriffs Office, all the agencies that you all are familiar with. And they continue to meet once a month to identify properties, do vacant property sweeps, do cleanups and those types of things. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Did I understand correctly that whatever type of abatement that occurs by the county, whatever costs are incurred you have a superior position to the original lienholder? MS. FLAGG: We do. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Nice. MS. FLAGG: There was an ordinance passed by the county quite a few years ago, and we do maintain a superior position. So we do get paid. MR. KAUFMAN: There will be no time where somebody would come before the board asking to abate a fine? For instance, I buy a property that has gone through foreclosure where the property is 500,000 and there was a $100,000 worth of liens on the property, the person comes before the board, timing is everything, to say they would like it abated, they just bought it? MS. FLAGG: No, we worked with the board and the board passed a resolution that before anything goes before the board, the property has to be in compliance. And the hard costs have to be paid. MR. LEFEBVRE: But that property wouldn't be able to be transferred, because you would have a lien on it. So that would have to be -- those fines would have to be cleared up at closing, correct? MS. FLAGG: Well, I mean, people can buy a property when there are fines on a property. MR. KAUFMAN: They can't get title insurance, but they can -- MS. FLAGG: Right. MR. KAUFMAN: -- buy the property. MS. FLAGG: But I will tell you what we routinely tell community members. There is a significant what we call shadow inventory in Collier County, meaning that the property had a lis Page 33 16g AL September 2 , 2010 pendens filed on it but it has not gone on the market, so the banks are holding those properties and have not released them to the market. So what we explain to them is, you know, it's a piece of property, don't fall in love with it and foolishly, you know, go sideways financially on this. Just negotiate the agreement. You can buy a piece of property if there is a code case on it, but you need to fully understand what your costs are going to be to bring it into compliance and take that into consideration. And if you don't get what you want, walk away from it. Because then the bank will have to bring it into compliance. And what we have found, now we've had a couple of cases where -- there was one case where a gentleman wanted -- I mean, he just had to have this house. And I told him I'd walk away from it, because it will get fixed. And historically what we see is once they bring it into compliance, it's quite possible that what you're offering now, when they go to sell it is going to be less. And sure enough, he monitored that house, the bank brought it into compliance, and then they took an off -- once the bank had expended the money to bring it into compliance, he bought the house for less than what he had originally offered. MR. KAUFMAN: Did they send you a thank you letter? MS. FLAGG: It's just, you know, unfortunately what made sense 10 years ago is not what it is today. It's just a -- it's a different environment that we're working in. Which is a good segue into the Economic Recovery Task Force. Jeri tells me you got all the information about that. And that task force, they've had three meetings now, so that progress report that you received was as -- was in -- for the third meeting. So you can see the significant amount of work that has occurred just in a very short period of time. And there's a lot of information in that report, so I don't know if you have any questions about that. (No response.) Page 34 1611 AL September 23, 2010 MS. FLAGG: Okay. And the last item is I want to let you know that a member of our team passed way. It was Mr. Ron Martindale. And we'll be retiring his investigator number in honor of his service. CHAIRMAN KELLY: That's a shame. Our hearts go out to his family. And if we would, how about a quick moment of silence for Investigator Martindale. (Moment of silence.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: In his honor. Anything else? MS. FLAGG: That's it. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Next meeting is going to be October 28th, 2010 right here in these chambers. And with that, I'll entertain a motion to adjourn. MR. KAUFMAN: Motion to adjourn. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Second. All in favor? MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. MR. DEAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. CHAIRMAN KELLY: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KELLY: We are adjourned. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10:01 a.m. Page 35 1611 A2 September 23, 2010 CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD KE ETH KELLY, Chairman These minutes approved by the board on or as corrected as presented Transcript prepared on behalf of Gregory Reporting Service, Inc., by Cherie' R. Nottingham. Page 36 Fiala 1ii14er �lenning -oyle roletta �- TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida, January, 6, 2011 11A 3 January 6, 2011 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: ALSO PRESENT: CHAIRMAN: Mark P. Strain Melissa Ahem Brad Schiffer Paul Midney Donna Reed Caron Diane Ebert Barry Klein ABSENT: Karen Homiak Bob Murray Jamie French, growth Management Division Raymond V. Bellows, Planning Manager, Zoning Jeff Klatzkow, County Attorney's Office Tom Eastman, School Board Member Misc. Cares: Date: Page 1 of 49 Item •: 1 I L 161 1 A 3 January 6, 2011 The applicant has agreed, if they could have -- if we could hear the transmittal and consent on the same day. Now, you've got to remember, this is a transmittal for GMP amendment. That's the first step. We have to go through an adoption of a GMP amendment. That's the second step; the same thing all over again. Plus they have to come in for a PUD rezone, which will be a third bite of the apple. So I didn't think the request to hear consent at the same time that we heard transmittal was something that would be problematic for us, but I told them I couldn't agree to that. It would be up to this entire board; however, I would urge us all to consider it in the fact that we're going to gain a lot more information by having the additional time to review the PUD document, and I think we can do a much better review, and we could very carefully handle the consent item at that meeting and also make sure staff, through discussion, understands exactly what we said. Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah. In my discussions with the petitioners, we talked about having the transmittal happen early in our next meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good. COMMISSIONER CARON: And then if there are any issues, they can work them out and come back, and then we can have the consent. And it seemed to be a logical -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. I have no problem with that. Does staff -- I forgot which staff member's in charge of this. And who was the planner; Nancy, was it you or Kay. Oh, I'm sorry this is Comp. Planning. Corby? Mike? MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi with Comprehensive Planning. The assigned comprehensive -- comprehensive planner is Corby Schmidt. So whatever commitments that are made, we will make sure that we can accom- speak for Corby that we can make sure that we can accommodate whatever the direction is that the Planning Commission would like to see. If it is the desire to push this to the 20th, provide you that application with the DRI and the PUD application so you could have the benefit of those understandings, and then have consent later on in the meeting on the 20th, if there's other information that's required, you know, staff is agreeable to whatever the direction of the CCPC would ask us to do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, unless -- well, as far as the documents go, the PUD is critical. That's the local zoning document that we really can sink our teeth into to understand what you're trying to say in your GMP amendment language or what they're trying to say. As tar as the DRI goes, a lot of the important studies and aspects of that were included in the packet that was received from your office. Unless an individual board member requests the DRI, to duplicate that and kill millions more trees, I'm not sure we need to go that far, but that's up to each individual member to contact you on the DRI if they want to see that. I would think that would be an acceptable practice. But the PUD, Mike -- and you know, if this happens again in the future -- those documents help you guys understand what someone's trying to say; they'd be invaluable to this board to see at the same time. Anybody else have any comments? COMMISSIONER EBERT: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Cormn ssioner Strain, I'm glad that you asked because -- because of the holidays and everything and Collier County was not open Monday, on Tuesday morning I burst down to the center and I said, I don't have this information. I feel like I'm voting on the healthcare bill. You have to vote for it before you can see what's in it. And that's exactly what I told him when I was there -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yep. COMMISSIONER EBERT: -- and got some of the questions answered. But I still have a lot of questions that remain unanswered. And you're right, I -- and I wanted to see the comments from the DRI. We have nothing. And you're right, nothing on the PUD, so I was upset with that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I'm glad to see that the board as a whole seemed to take that position, because maybe it won't happen again so easily. So if nobody else has any questions or concerns, I would like to ask the applicant if they still are willing to work with us on this issue until the next meeting date. We'll hear you first up, and before the day's over, we'll hear Page 3 of 49 16 I 1 A '7anuary 612011 MR.YOVANOVICH: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We appreciate it. We'll see you back on the 20th. Mike, 1 expect that they'll be sent out hard copy for the PUD, and if you -- any of the commissioners would like the DRI or portions of it, just email or call Mike, and I'm sure he'll get you that as well. MR. BOSI: I will gather the PUD documents up today, and we'll FedEx them out to all the Planning Commission members by the end of the day. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MR. BOSI: And as you said, if I receive any emails for any DRI information -- which I'm not quite sure the project coordinator for the DRI PUD -- Kay Deselem has been on medical leave for the past month, so I'll have to try to find out where they're at in the status of the review for those individual documents. But I'll get you whatever is the most current applications. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The most current application in the form of our standard PUD document, is there a -- is what we're basically looking for. MR. BOSI: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I mean, all the staff write -ups from this point, I know it can't be completed, so they're probably not going to be as relevant. copies. Jamie, did you have something you wanted to throw in, or Ray? MR. FRENCH: Ray did, sir. MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. For the record, Ray Bellows. I have been working with Corby when this issue came up yesterday, and I was able to track down those So we can surely get them to you in time. MR. FRENCH: And then rather than FedEx'ing them, I'll make sure they get hand delivered like we've done in the past. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Either way. As long as we get them, that's what counts. MR. FRENCH: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR. BOSI: Thank you. COMMISSIONER CARON: Jamie, I'm happy to come and pick mine up here. You don't have to deliver it. I'm going to be -- I'm not too far, so -- MR. FRENCH: Okay. COMMISSIONER CARON: So if you just let me know when they're ready. MR. FRENCH: I'll let Judy know to just reach directly out to you, ma'am. COMMISSIONER AHERN: And she can hold mine. I'll be there for BZA tomorrow, so I can pick it up. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I've already told Corby I'll pick acne up as well. MR. FRENCH: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So that's three. So that reduces the list a bit. When you distribute these to other planning commissioners, especially the two that aren't here today, you might want to make note to them that this is for background information, and we're not going to be entertaining critique of those documents at our GMP hearing. MR. FRENCH: I'll make sure that message is clear from staff, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And that brings us to the only remaining thing on our agenda. Oh, no. I saw Fred in the audience for some reason. We could skip over that and forget about it today and have him and Tim go crazy. But let's move on down through the agenda, because we're really on addenda to the agenda on that point. Planning Commission absences. Our next meeting, I believe, is the 20th. Ray, do we have anything in between? MR. BELLOWS: No other meetings in between. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody know if they're not going to be here on the 20th? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. We'll have a quorum then. Approval of minutes from December 2, 2010, EAR adoption; is there a motion to either change or approve? Page 5 of 49 16 A3 January 6, 2011 COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Yeah. It would be on 2 of 7. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right above accessory structures. The minimum setback should be from -- cross out the word south and make property lines plural, and I'd be happy. There is two other properly lines where they could pull a building up close, so -- COMMISSIONER CARON: Well -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead; Ms. Caron? COMMISSIONER CARON: But along the -- I don't know which is north/south in here -- along the north edge, that's all preserve, right? And don't you have to be 25? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, I'm not worried about the property line there, because they would be well into the preserve, so that wouldn't be allowed. COMMISSIONER CARON: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: It's the other three that -- COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, no. I think that's what we had talked about, but -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody have any concerns over that? MR. HOOD: Good morning. Fred Hood with Davidson Engineering, for the record. If I'm understanding you correctly, Commissioner, you're talking about the east and the west side? And you're asking if we can make 20 feet from the property line. On the east side there's a minimum of a 20 -foot setback for the rear yard, so that would take care of that -- that eastern edge of the PUD. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I mean, if it's the rear yard of a unit. MR. HOOD: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: It could be a side yard. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But, Fred, if it's already taken care of, what then would it matter if this is included? MR. HOOD: It doesn't. I'm just trying to avoid some redundancy, I guess. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I think where Brad's going is, you could make a -- the configuration of lots could be such that you might call one a side yard and then have a reduced setback when you never intended that, or at least it wasn't clear to us the intention was that way. MR. HOOD: Okay. I understand that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's like the belt and the suspenders, I think, for the issue. MR. HOOD: We can make that change. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And I can -- the geometry I'm afraid of is, it is common on some projects to put a small access road and then put units facing opposite of what you guys are really planning to use. MR. HOOD: Right. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So that's the condition I'm protecting. MR. HOOD: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay? MR. HOOD: So just strike the word south? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right, and add the pluralization to the word line. MR. HOOD: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else have any questions or concerns? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Then I'll move to approve it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Motion made by Commissioner Schiffer to approve it -- COMMISSIONER CARON: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: -- subject to the changes discussed here today, and seconded by Ms. Caron. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER AHERN: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Aye. COMMISSIONER MIDNEY: Aye. Page 7 of 49 1611A3 January 6, 2011 Okay. And just so we set the understanding --because we have new board members who didn't get the benefit of sitting through this before, this is a document that we more or less are forced to implement to be more consistent with state standards versus the older ordinance that we currently have on our books. Is that a fair statement? MR. WILEY: Federal standards. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. But is that an accurate statement? MR. WILEY: Yes, sir. We are updating it at the direction of FEMA. Our ordinance was back in 1986. They consider it outdated, so we are updating it to be in compliance with the format of the State of Florida model ordinance, which was developed by the State of Florida and FEMA. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And the objective, I think, was that we would try to keep the maximum flexibility in this document for Collier County, but at the same time meet the intentions of FEMA so that we could then have the flexibility we need in our rules and regulations to the benefit of this community the best we can see it. MR. WILEY: That's one way of looking at it. The way I was given direction is to make it to the minimum standards. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, that's the most flexible. Then we would then implement standards to tighten MR. WILEY: If that's what you meant by it, but I was told, go for the minimum. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. With that in mind then, we can start -- it's about a 35 -page document. Let's start working our way through it a few pages at a time. MR. WILEY: Okay. As we start, let me just, if I can, go through a little bit of an introduction here for some things you're going to be wanting to look at. When we came to the board two times ago and then the time we came to you also, there were some questions we want to make sure we go over today when we get into discussions on floodproofing a building, and that is building the building to keep water out of it or actually letting water come in but building it in such a way that it doesn't do damage. There's another question that has come up, and I was given direction only as recently as yesterday. So I have some revised definitions to hand out to you today. On the 12 -month cumulative period to consider when you make improvements to a building as to when it becomes substantial improvements or repair of substantial damage -- and that substantial number is that 50 percent of the value of the structure threshold. We were going under the impression that I had from training I've been through from Jim Turner, with the training he's been through, that the default mechanism is a 12 -month period. If you pull a building permit, oh, for the next 12 months, the value of that permit is considered in for all subsequent permits, and you put those together -- when you have a structure in the special flood hazard area, and that's the flood hazard area as defined as flood zones that start with the letters A or V -- so we thought you had a 12 -month default period. And I don't know who it was, but somebody asked Jim Tumerjusi to show them where it was. So we started looking. No problem. We'll find it. Well, as it turns out, it technically is not there. It was recommended direction. So we've done the 12 -month period as policy internally for years. That's just what everybody's been doing in the Building Department. So what I was given direction for as of yesterday is to actually put that language of a 12 -month period within our ordinance so we codify it, not just do it via policy. So I want to give you those definitions today. It doesn't change what we're currently doing, but it does officially document it so everyone knows where to go find that 12 -month period now. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Can you pass those out to us? MR. WILEY: I will do so right now. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. And while he's doing that, has the County Attorney's Office reviewed this final draft? I know you had input into it because I saw the notations, but have you basically gotten through it? MR. KLATZKOW: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, at least it's only one sheet, Robert. MR. WILEY: What you have on this page is a draft set of definitions for substantial damage, substantial improvement, and substantially improved existing manufactured home parks or subdivisions. And what we've done, Page 9 of 49 16 I 1 A3 January 6, 2011 Now, the definition that we just talked about that I handed to you is not in this document When we get to these definitions, they would be inserted in there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: While we're on those continents, FMPC; that is what organiz- -- what group? MR. WILEY: That is the F000dplain Management Planning Committee. That is a 23- member committee that was appointed by the county manager at the resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. There's ten citizen positions. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I notice that they have comments in the right -hand column periodically throughout this document, too. Where on the top designations, between 9/1/10 and 12/21/10, did they see this after we had seen it or -- MR. WILEY: They actually see it before DSAC. So this starts with their document. But what I'm showing you is comments they had put in that relate to this document versus the model ordinance. So you're starting to see from the model ordinance document changes that have been made by the various entities that have reviewed this. So I started with the floodplain committee's basic revisions, took that to DSAC, and then have started going forward from there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. But what I'm getting at is, since these comments aren't dated, the dating -- every reference to the FMPC was prior to us hearing it as we started hearing it; is that correct? MR. WILEY: That is correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Because l don't want to have changes by a subcommittee popping up again after we review it, and that's what my concern was. MR. WILEY: No. This is -- you're the end of the road for review before going to the board. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, let's get through some of these pages, and we'll go through -- let's go through five pages at a time. Anybody have questions on Pages 1 through 5? Mr. Schiffer, then Ms. Caron. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Bob, just to make sure, the area of special flood hazard does not include D and does not include X? MR. WILEY: It does not include D and does not include X, that's correct. It starts only with the letter A or V, as in velocity. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Which is what it says, but we're going to discuss that later. Thank you. MR. WILEY: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ms. Caron. COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah. There are a couple of definitions, one for accessory structure, one for coastal high hazard area -- and I guess that's all in the first five pages -- where the definition here is different from our code. I'm not sure -- and I'll ask the county attorney to weigh in on this. Is it good for us to have conflicting language? Shouldn't we use the same, especially if ours is stricter to begin with? Why would we indicate to somebody that they could do something less than we're actually going to require them to do? MR. KLATZKOW: Well, you try to be consistent throughout your codes. Sometimes, however, when you're dealing with an outside agency like the states or feds, you've got to conform your definitions to what they want to do. COMMISSIONER CARON: But I think that -- and we sort of had this discussion the last time -- that it -- throughout the document, it had seemed pretty convenient that when we wanted to follow FEMA's definition, we said, oh, FEMA's making us do this. And when we wanted to have different language in here because it suited us, we put it in here. So I just think that we should be consistent and not have various things for people to look at. So if somebody only looks at this for some reason, you know, and then we turn around and say, well, I'm sorry, but in the LDC our code is actually stricter and you need to follow that stricter standard, why don't you just put it in here? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I think that FEMA is more concerned about structures and buildings that are habitable, that qualified for having electricity at a certain level, having air - conditioning, and things like that, and so and I had the same concern, if you recall, at the last meeting, that under accessory structure we don't include a guesthouse. Well, if you read the -- as you read the FEMA document, you realize that guesthouses are all part of their habitable structures, and accessories in their eyes are non - habitable, items that are like -- a cover over a well or a well Page 11 of 49 16 f 1 A 3 Auary 6, 2011 COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Sometimes you'll find in arguments on code, people playing code chess, that somebody will take a definition from an inappropriate section and try to use it where it doesn't belong. That's going to happen, and that's really what staff is smart enough to prevent, but the point is -- COMMISSIONER CARON: Sometimes. MR. BELLOWS: I think Commissioner Schiffer has a good point, and I think maybe one solution would be to, on section two -- and I put it up on the visualizer — is to add a caveat to that introductory statement, all definitions used in this provision/ordinance are only applicable to this ordinance and do not supersede any other Land Development Code definition. COMMISSIONER CARON: I think that would be appropriate. MR. BELLOWS: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. That works. Everybody okay with that, needs further clarification? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good. Pages 1 through 5, any other issues on I through 5? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I have one, Robert, on Page 3, area of shallow flooding. This was our discussion -- we had this discussion before. We changed it from one -- it used to say with base flood depths from I to 3 feet, and now it just says, anything less than 3 feet. So if there was a 2 -inch area of standing water, they would then become an area of shallow flooding? MR. WILEY: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Why is that better than leaving it from 1 to 3 feet? I mean, if it's a small pond -- puddling of water, a couple inches of water, I don't know how it has a negative effect as far as flooding goes. MR. WILEY: Collier County's topography, as you know, is very flat. We're going through the issue of developing new maps with FEMA right now to delineate the extent of flood zones. One of the issues that came up in that is this very discussion for an All zone, area of holding. That is a zone that FEMA has recommended and is going to go into effect on the new DFIRM, digital flood insurance rate map. So I argued the point with them that by their very definition, area of shallow flooding where it is from -- and it says it has base flood depths of -- from 1 to 3 feet, I said, so for all those areas of AH flooding that you've identified that are less than 1 foot in depth, they should become Zone X. I was adamant. I said, that's what your very definition out of your books, out of your web page, everything says. You go to definition for Zone X, it says, even within the special flood hazard areas, depths of less than I foot can also be zoned X. I lost. As they come back, their answer was, they have to take the flood elevation contour landward until it touches ground, no matter what the depth is. They don't go to 1 foot below flood elevation where it touches ground to give you that 1 -foot difference. When we went through that, they even wrote me a letter. I won't say it's a nice letter, but they wrote me a letter verifying their position is that they will take the base flood elevation to the point at which it touches ground even though it may be less than 1 foot. That's why I changed the definition, so that we don't have a lot of the confusion that we create within our county where the AH flooding from sheet flow is going to be less than I foot in depth. Their explanation goes from the background that they take into considerations the extent of the upstream watershed, the whole area that's under consideration for flooding evaluation, a lot of factors that go into it, to clarify it and make it easier to understand within our county. That's why I changed the definition to comply with that clarification letter that I got from FEMA. If you want, I can go back and change it to their precise definition. But when I do, I'm very suspicious that someone will take that definition then and hold it up to us and say, well, my flooding is projected to be less than 1 foot. I have to be in Zone X. And we don't really want to keep fighting that battle every day over in the permit application process with someone. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, unlike you, I'd rather fight that every day, every night, every hour, every minute until we beat the federal government. MR. WILEY: But it wouldn't -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This idea of taking all the Zone Xs out across the board in Collier County and Page 13 of 49 16 I 1 A 3 ianuary 6, 2011 MR. WILEY: I'm good with that. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. And the reason is, that way it's clear that's what you mean by construction materials, and you do a nice job of defining that in the definition. MR. WILEY: So is that the direction to go? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody -- from the board, anybody have any concerns? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Nope. The consensus is okay, use it. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Then the only question I have on 10 is, what does SFHA mean? I never could figure that out. South Florida I lousing Authority? MR. WILEY: SFHA is a special flood hazard area. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. MR. WILEY: You can find it under the definitions of area of special flood hazard. Don't laugh. FEMA defines it as area of special flood hazard then uses the acronym special flood hazard area. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But do we -- MR. WILEY: I can't explain why. I just follow their acronyms. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. But do we -- maybe we should put a parentheses after that and explain that out. MR. WILEY: What we do is in the definition for area of special flood hazard, if you go to special flood hazard area, it has its own separate definition under the S's. It refers you back to area of special flood hazard. So we sort of get to act like a ping -pong ball here back and forth between definitions -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But you don't put the acronym in parentheticals after anywhere where it's referenced, at least in the document I found. Could you do that under the definition of special flood hazard, put a parenthetical that references the acronym you're talking about? MR. WILEY: Well, that's one thing I want to talk to you about is what I hope to do after we get all the way through your -all's comments today is then go back through, as one of the floodplain committee members asked me to do, and just put in a whole section of acronyms so we can clearly see what they mean. They won't be adding anything, just as we go through -- that way you've got one place to go look them all up. I mean, I can add them to the definitions, but they asked me to just create a section on acronyms. I'm waiting till we get everything done before I do that. If that gels the direction of the board, we'll go forward. If you don't want it -- I mean, I can put them with the definitions, but that was just their thought. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, Bob, let me say, there was no way anybody would know what SFHA means. So the answer is, of course you have to do that. I mean, how would I know what SFHA is? Is it that I didn't read the document thoroughly enough, or there's no way I would know what that meant? There is no way I would know what that meant, is there? So that's not good. So of course you have to do that, or do what Mark said, when you use the term, put the parentheses and show us that the acronym is going to be that, like you do with, you know, NAVD, stuff like that. MR. WILEY: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: You can't leave us lost. MR. WILEY: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So we're going to end up adding a table of acronyms to the beginning of this document? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And wouldn't that have been nice? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But it goes back to us having the -- everything in front of us that is going to go to the board. We're now going to have everything in front of us with the exception of the table of acronyms. The least you could do, when you get the table created, which you need to do fairly quickly to schedule it before the board, is email us a copy of those acronyms so we can at least have that. And if there's concerns, we can individually give you a call. MR. WILEY: Well, what I would like to do is email you -all the completed document that's going to the Board of County Commissioners, CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's fine, too. MR. WILEY: But I didn't want to have to actually come back and present to you, but I can if you direct. Page 15 of 49 161 1 A3 January 6, 2011 organization that goes through the approval process to make the request even to FEMA to bring the housing in. That's my understanding of the situation. So we have to approve this, and we have to actually request the housing before it comes in. So this is just standard process it would actually go through. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. Then since this page also has the substantial- damage definitions that you add, can we look at those now? MR. WILEY: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And essentially what you're saying there is that at the end of certificate of occupancy, or CO, and that's a construction project that has a value and everybody knows what everything's worth at that point in time, after 12 months, do you -- the meter goes back to zero, and then 13 months from now if I want to do something, I place value, and then again when that's done -- you know, so nowhere in there can, within a 12 -month span that's going from the value from the CC to zero, can I spend more than 50 percent of the value of the unit; is that right? I mean -- MR. WILEY: That is correct. And remember, this is applicable only to those structures which are within the special flood hazard area and their floor elevation does not meet the current minimum base flood elevation. So if you are in a house that is -- with the floor elevation higher than the base flood elevation, you're really not even at issue here for substantial improvements because there's nothing to modify about the house. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: All right. Ijust want to understand, because this is a number and a time, so let's just stay in there. MR. WILEY: But you are correct on that. It's -- the 50 percent value would be the total constructions dollars within a 12 -month window of time. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So if I did a repair to my building and a storm occurred within 12 months of that, I've got a problem based on my neighbor who didn't do a repair to his building and a storm occurred, because he's sitting there with a balance at zero; I'm sitting there with a balance of my last pemtit being completed, you know, and then we're going to also discuss what happens if it's not completed. But some -- is that the case that -- in other words, two houses, one the guy put a 49 percent lanai on. He'll only be able to have 1 percent damage before he kicks in, where the neighbor who didn't do anything to his house, he can spend up to 50 percent to repair his damage; is that right? MR. WILEY: Well, again, you can go ahead and do the repair to the damage' you just would have to, in the first instance where the individual has already encroached to within the improvement value allowed, they would bit the threshold where it would require them to mitigate the entire house at that point, which basically means elevate the house is -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, I don't want to get into what it means. I just -- MR. WILEY: Just to give you an example. So you're right, once you start down the path of making improvements or repair of damage to a house that has the floor elevation lower than the flood elevation for that property, you do run the risk of conning up against an increased dollar value from a storm or something that could force you to mitigate the house, that's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. And does that seem fair? MR. WILEY: That's what we're doing right now, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. So again -- MR. WILEY: We'rejust putting it into the ordinance, the actual 12 month that we've been holding by policy for years. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: One guy remodels his house, spends up to 49, so he didn't kick off the 50 percent when he did his remodeling. No stone related, then the neighbor does nothing. A stone comes, there's 25 percent damage to both houses. One guy has to remedy; the other guy doesn't. MR. WILEY: One guy would have to mitigate the house, that is correct. And it wouldn't have to be a storm. It could be a fire, any damage. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I've got more on other pages, but we can stop here if anybody has -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I've got an issue with that, too, but I'll wait for Ms. Caron. COMMISSIONER CARON: Well, I was just going to say, because the goal in the county is that when you start doing improvements, you should be getting these houses up out of the flood zone; otherwise, we'rejust in a constant state here. So that -- I mean, that's why that's always been that way. Page 17 of 49 16 1 1 A3 Japuary 6, 2011 basis. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I think maybe where I'm having trouble is, it makes sense in the definition of substantial improvement. That means that if I'm a gray fixing my house as -- you know, I can nibble away year by year and not have to bring the whole house up, but if I do a major thing, I'm going to rip off 60 percent of my house and rebuild it, I've got to fix the whole house and bring it all. So maybe the answer is, take it out of substantial damage, which is where that level playing field is lost, keep it in substantial improvement, and then, I guess, keep it in substantial improvement for a manufactured. It's probably in the damage that I have the problem, and only there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Ms. Caron. COMMISSIONER CARON: Well, ljust wanted to ask. Does anybody on staff have a problem with the language that Commissioner Strain put forward? It seems to change it to level the playing field without upsetting really what's been happening. MR. WILEY: If you change the language as per Commissioner Strain or as per Commissioner -- Schiffer -- COMMISSIONER CARON: Two different things. MR. WILEY: But either way, you negate the value of having cumulative and it becomes worthless as far as us able to enforce it to meet the requirements of FEMA; so, therefore, we simply would go back to the permit -by- permit issuance, because we have no uniformity program upon which tojustify the applications coming in. You either have cumulative or you don't. Cumulative has to address damage as well as improvements. It's -- you can't have one without the other. COMMISSIONER CARON: Well, what if we get more than one storm in a year? You'll have cumulative. MR. WILEY: That is the very issue you brought up of then mitigating structures to bring them up out of the floodplain areas. That's where that comes in. COMMISSIONER CARON: Damage. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Why did we not just leave the definitions as they are in this document and put in -- repetitive loss back in. What was the purpose now of changing that again? MR. WILEY: Okay. Repetitive loss is a different concept. We can also talk about that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But this is -- but we're talking about a concept just for this ordinance, right? MR. WILEY: And we are talking about for our ordinance, that is correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So if we're looking as a minimum standard in which we can embellish greater in our own ordinances locally, why wouldn't we want to leave it? Because the repetitive -loss statement in here seems to be a more flexible standard to work with this ordinance for, and then we use our other standards to work with the other avenues and ordinances and building- permit regulations that we have. Why would we want to mix the two when we didn't do that, for example, under definitions for accessory structures? We didn't mix and match there. We stayed strictly with FEMA for FEMA. Wouldn't we be better off strictly -- staying strictly with their definition of substantial damage referring to repetitive loss versus trying to institute a policy change in this document to accommodate our -- some other ordinance we have? MR. WILEY: When we came before this board previously, that's when I was given direction coming from the County Attorney's Office to remove the definition for repetitive loss. You -all had expressed very serious concern about the definition. He could not find it in the model ordinance, which was an earlier draft, that he had not seen the most - revised draft. It was in there. It's in the model ordinance as an optional definition for repetitive loss. So the direction I got from the attorney's office is to strike it. It is stricken in this document. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But what we got, I think, is worse. So I'm not sure we wanted to go to a worse situation. MR. WILEY: Again, if you do not wish to have 12 -month cumulative in the ordinance, you strike it. This simply is put it there to show you what we are doing by policy. It is not codified. The direction I was given is to put it within the ordinance so we can codify it so it's a clear point of reference everyone can go to. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So you've, by -- staff has established a policy that -- apparently then the policies don't go through the Board of County Commissioners or -- MR. WILEY: We were going by our understanding of what the program required. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Page 19 of 49 16 I 1 A3 tJanuary 6, 2011 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I agree. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But let me just talk to Tatiana a second, because, you know, this is something in the building permit we deal with. In other words, we're going to remodel a home that does have some flood - elevation problems. It has been -- and maybe it's just been, you know, legacy, Jamie. I mean, the 12 -month surprises me that that's not locked in somewhere. But it has been that if we're doing remodelings on a home and we are going to exceed half its value, which we -- the big argument has always been how to prove that -- we do have to bring the whole home into compliance. MR. FRENCH: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So that's an improvement. There's no storms in the wind, there's nothing happening. That's decisions of people who are upgrading to what we know now is a better way to go. I think that should still exist. I think we should have some conversations about 12 months, if that's up for grabs. Maybe it's 18 months, maybe 6 months. But whatever it is, that should still exist that over time we will bring the community into better compliance. I don't like that insubstantial damage; in other words, you get nailed with a storm, and the reason I don't like it is the explanation I gave, is the guy next door could have done 49 percent and he has a disadvantage to the other people. Tatiana, do you want to say something? MS. GUST: I would like to bring something to your attention. If you have the definition in there of substantial damage -- and that refers to when the damage -- means damage of any origin sustaining by structure where the cost of restoring the structure to its before - damage condition will equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. So that includes that improvement value. So that house value will be higher than the neighbor because of that improvement for that damage consideration. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. And the problem we always get into is -- and you're right. In my story what I didn't say is the guy who fixed his house up is probably worth more than the guy who didn't. Not necessarily. I mean, he could have done improvements that don't really improve the value of the house. We're assuming dollar -to- dollar that it works. But, you know -- and normally, Tatiana, the conversation you must be having is, how do you figure the 50 percent? When a building looks like it's -- half of it's going to be remodeled, you start to wonder whether this should kick in. And, you know, what kind of data do people present to you to determine the value? MS. GUST: Currently we're -- they're providing us the proper appraiser value, and we compare that value with the cost of construction for the improvement. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. MS. GUST: And we determine -- I mean -- and that way we determine the 50 percent, if you exceed or not, the 50 percent value of the appraised value of the structure. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Which should generate arguments because of the appraised value. But the -- but anyway -- MR. FRENCH: There's also an inflater that we use as well, that FEMA allows us. We apply a 20 percent inflater. So whatever the property appraiser would come in and say, here's what the appraised value is of that structure, what we would then do is we'd apply the 20 percent improvement. And what I spoke to -- about Tatiana is -- so if you came in with a -- let's say a $100,000 improvement, you've got a construction value sheet that you've done your certificate on that you based your building permit on. So we would also apply that $100,000. And, again, the -- so at that point the neighbor's -- the neighbor's home would be substantially less than the home that was just improved. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But I do think we're better off not considering any permits -- if the house is damaged, that would be the person who's going to be claiming the 50 percent. He will have that data. So I don't know why we need the 12 -- the time frame in the damaged home. I know why we need it in the improvement home. MR. FRENCH: And the one thing that I've not included is that FEMA -- the recommendation is 12 months, but they did say, you will define a time, and how we defined that time is between building permit. So as Robert said, we can do this at -- permit to permit. Now, what that does from just simply what -- Nick Page 21 of 49 16 I 1 A3 January 6, 2011 did -- who dealt with it before? When you were applying for a permit on a house in the coastal high hazard were you doing it, or when did you start to look at the 50 percent? Where -- currently? MR. WILEY: Anywhere you are within an A or a VE flood zone and your floor elevation does not meet the flood elevation. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Generally west of 41. COMMISSIONER CARON: West of 41. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So this is a -- MR. WILEY: That's a general way to say it, right, west or south. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: This clause is going to open up a huge amount of the county that never even thought about this. MR. WILEY: Just the ordinance itself -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Tatianna's statement has -- MR. WILEY: -- will begin to impact more people. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Explain why you're shaking your head, Tatiana. MS. GUST: Because our -- currently as we have done it, we review 50 percent of FEMA for any improvement in an AE or VE zoning. Currently we do. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But the concern we have is we have new flood maps that -- most of the county was in X and D. X is still fine, although X changed. So there's some people that thought they were in X and are no longer in X, and then most of the county was in D, which would not be something you would look at. Now, most of that is all in some sort of an A zone. So the point is that -- the reality here we have is that a huge amount of county will now be subject to this review that wasn't in the past. And like, for example, if a home -- we have requirements for height above the crown of the road. Were homes being reviewed for improvements according to that, or theyjust weren't even looked at, Bob? MR. WILEY: You're talking about in Golden Gate Estates where we have the ordinance requirement 18 inches above crown of road, which is also contained within this ordinance as we get to that particular section. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. MR. WILEY: And that will continue to still be one review criteria. So you will meet the higher of elevation. And whether it be the FEMA base flood elevation or the 18 -inch in those platted subdivisions. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, currently do you do that? I mean, when I come in and I'm remodeling a home out in the Estates that was built in the'70s, I'm adding an addition on the back. Do you check the crown -- I mean, are you doing the 50 percent check now? MS. GUST: If it's currently located in an AE or VE zoning, yes, we do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Your question (sic) is not responding as he says currently. Currently, Golden Gate Estates is an X or a D. For example, Immokalee. When hmmokalee comes in, do you apply that 12 -month rule to Immokalee improvements? MS. GUST: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. After this new map goes in, you will most likely have to, and that's what we're trying to say. MS. GUST: Okay. And I would like to also mention that the purpose of all this is to protect -- basically to reduce the risk of damage for the local community. Now, when the community is in a flood zone and there are improvements made to the community in general, the risks increase. So the insurance -- the National Flood Insurance Program may increase the insurance rate in the future because of -- the improvement that is in a flood - hazard area is increased as well. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But see, you're under the premise that the federal government is right in declaring most of Collier County a flood - hazard area. I think there's a lot of people that would disagree with that. MS. GUST: And I'm with you. But that's the map that is coming, and I cannot -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I know, but the -- MR. WILEY: Ijust have to go by what is coming. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But the reasoning between the -- is flawed, not in you from what you said, but behind the government. Go ahead. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But the intent of her comment is the insurance rate. Bob's saying that we Page 23 of 49 16 1 1 A3 3 Jantary 6, 2011 issues when we come in with a package. My tendency is to drop it on all three paragraphs, leave the repetitive out, and just leave it there so that we can decide as a package later on if we want to do enough to drop us a whole number in the CRS level rather than throw things in here that have not — and my big concern with this, even in the substantial- improvement paragraph and the last paragraph, is that this was just thought of during the holiday season. It has not been vetted publicly. That's a real concern. I'd rather have the stakeholders, the builders, the contractors, the developers, everybody chiming in on this. Because I'll tell you what, if this is a trigger to someone's mindset and how they're going to make improvements on their home, they may not make improvements on their home. So there's going to be a lot of people that could be impacted by this. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I agree, Mark. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So why delve into this now in such an unvetted forum when we could better later on? And, Jeff, you seem anxious to say something. MR. KLATZKOW: Yeah. You've got an interesting policy discussion going on here, and we're just in the definitional section. COMMISSIONER CARON: Right, exactly. MR. KLATZKOW: No, no. But this is what I'm getting at. If what I'm hearing from you is that we're not get any benefits under the way FEMA scores things anyway, since we're not going to five years or ten years, so why even have this? All right. And if that's the policy, your focus on the definitions, they're only in here because this concept is embedded within the ordinance itself. And if the policy is not to have this, we've got to remove that concept from the ordinance. I mean -- which is going to take more than just doing it on the fly here, I'm going to tell you. This is going to have to come back. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I mean, if it comes back, it has -- boy, this piece of Scotch tape is really sticking. But if it has to come back -- it might have to, Jeff. I'm not -- I am certainly not comfortable with it. I think the builders -- CBIA is not as active as they used to be. But, my God, they ought to be participating in this knowing that -- and if I was a home remodeler and I knew my business was part of people out there having their additions to their home and this was going to impact that, I'd certainly want to be here, because it goes across the county now. MR. KLATZKOW: What I'm getting at, this is a significant policy recommendation that you're heading towards. And what I'm saying is, if that's the recommendation -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're getting away from it, by the way. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Yeah. MR. KLATZKOW: If that's the reconunendation, we've got to redo this entire ordinance to get that issue out of the ordinance. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well -- and I -- I think we're heading away from establishing a policy that has not been acknowledged by the board and part of an ordinance and that's been properly vetted in public. So I don't think we're heading towards it. I think we're heading away from it. Now, how we get it out of here would -- I guess is a concern that -- why don't we take a break, and maybe we can discuss on where to go from here. And during the break I'd like to ask you that. Because I'm real concerned we're getting areas that the public is not fully aware of, especially the business community, and that -- and in the times when we're short on labor -- short on employment and everything else, this will only hurt. Go ahead, Melissa. COMMISSIONER AHERN: If, God forbid, there is a storm, we're going to create conditions where more people are just going to walk away from their houses. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: They won't be able to afford to rebuild, I agree, I agree. And now that the entire county is, unfortunately, falsely under this floodplain stuff, we're going to have a real problem. So -- well, okay. Let's take a 15 -m mute break, come back at 10:15, and we'll go from there. (A brief recess was had.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Let's get back to our meeting. First of all, during the break, Corby had -- was nice enough to bring in the PUDs for the Hacienda Lakes project. So we now have that. I believe everybody has gotten one. The two commissioners that are absent will Page 25 of 49 16111 A 3 January 6, 2011 future under a CRS change if it's so desired at that point. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Which means essentially ignore the handout? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. MR. WILEY: You'd ignore the handout, yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And we had -- we were trying to get through Pages 10 through 15. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I have a 13. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Brad. You might pull that mike closer. There you go. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Bob, we're referring to the wet season, so what somebody has to do is come in and provide you with the wet season water table elevation, okay, which essentially -- isn't that -- to do it properly, wouldn't somebody build a test hole and test it for a whole bunch -- a year and then say, this is the wet season elevation, or do you have a month? Other communities have a month, and the test has to be done during that month. So what do we have? MR. WILEY: As we have discussed before, the issue is the same process you would go through with any developer who goes to the Water Management District. You can use the geo -tech, drill the bore hole, they'll come up with -- out of the samples they pull up, they'll identify what they think is a water - season table elevation. You go to the site, you'll look at your hydrology from the visible eyeball, you'll look at the plant species that are there, do you find high waterlines for water table elevation, do you find seasonal high, do you find lows -- it's the very same criteria we're using should you be a developer. It's nothing new. This just simply brings into consideration the huge area that's up around Immokalee and down State Route 29 and even to the east of that, which was placed into an approximate Zone A back in 2005 that -- it requires you to have some idea upon how you're going to set your floor elevation, because each application you have to establish what's a flood -zone elevation out through there. We know that there are certain situations to where we can't simply measure from ground, because ground is below wet season and water table. And so to keep the same level of risk, we're simply saying where the water table is above ground, you would measure from that. That's where this definition comes into play is when you get into the section of the approximate Zone A. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And you would measure the highest water table? Remember, that all of those things you describe are changing throughout the year. MR. WILEY: You measure your wet - season water table is what we're saying, which is a line. I'm not the environmentalist who does it, but I've seen people do it, and they can go there and they can look at -- particularly in cypress head, they'll look at various lines, and they'll tell you what the lines mean. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. MR. WILEY: I don't do that. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So I want to, on my plan, show this number. Where do I get it, and how -- is a land surveyor the one who gives me this number? Because even -- there's a line on a tree. That's not -- I'm not going to -- MR. WILEY: He would come -- you would have to have a surveyor establish the actual elevation for you once someone else had identified where was the location for the line. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So the point of my question is, that I think this ordinance should tell people clearly what it is that has to be submitted to the Building Department for the plan. So should we not in here note that the land -- it should come from somebody. You don't want an architect measuring trees. You don't want people looking at, you know, water throughout the year, or -- you know, and when is the wet season? You know, I mean, is it October, like most communities have? When is it? When is the highest water table in Collier County? Does anybody know that? So how would the poor guy trying to do a plan know that? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, in the past -- and I've had to do this on projects -- we would have an environmentalist come out and identify a ring on a tree or lichen signs on a plant species or something of that nature. There'd be signs in the environment that would tell where the water would generally stay at at a normally high level, and then the surveyors would come out and benchmark it. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Now, you're the little guy putting an addition on his house. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would suggest that -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: What's he going to do? Is he going to -- I mean, that's a great description of Page 27 of 49 16 11q 3 wary 6, 2011 that this ordinance — in other words, from this point on, it's only those areas that are in special flood hazard areas, correct? So in other words, if I own an X and I own a D, I can skip this section? MR. WILEY: That's not what it says. Notice what it says. The ordinance shall apply to all areas of special flood hazard except as otherwise noted. That phrase is put in there because of the addition of our local criteria which is in our current ordinance for that 18- inches - above -crown road criteria which may be within a Zone X, but we still have the local criteria. So when we go in the ordinance to that section, that is where it is noted as an area that applies to; otherwise, it is onlyjust a special flood hazard area. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And that's why I'm bringing it up. But it is only that section, right? So can't we, out of courtesy to people, make them not have to read this whole section to determine that? Can't you just state, go to that, except as, and give that section? Because here's what you're saying to somebody. And, you know, we're talking about, you know, code courtesy here is the -- much like the definitions, you -- don't make me read the whole thing to find out where -- or where it is. For two reasons. One, it makes me read the whole thing; two, I may miss something. I may miss the thing you're looking for. So why -- if it's only that one area, which it is, why can't wejust send them right there? MR. WILEY: We can. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, let's do it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Great. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Do you want me to find out what it is, or do you know what it is, or you will do that? MR. WILEY: I71 do that. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Because we've talked about this before. MR. WILEY: I'm coming back anyway, so I'll do that. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. And that is the only place, so let's just -- MR. WILEY: I mean, you can see it right there in the comment, it tells you where it is, so that we will simply say, except as noted in Section 5A16. But be careful about using a particular section number as verbatim because if something gets renumbered between now and when we come back -- but that's why we'll simply reference the location appropriately. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, okay -- but -- all right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anything else through Page 15? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Fifteen, l still have -- this brings in the violation, is, why do we have violations based on days, not based on -- because think about this thing. If somebody violates this ordinance, what really should happen to them is they should not be covered by insurance. They should have penalty. But to come up with a monetary per -day thing, what does that -- you know, a guy installs ductwork underneath the house below the elevation. What does the day — dollars per day have to do with that? Now, I know that's how we do code violations, but this is one, you know, section of code that is punished by Mother Nature, you know. In other words, if you do violate it, odds are you're going to be damaged in a storm. So, it's -- you know, I know we talked about it in the past, but I'm still having trouble coming up with $5,000 a day for violations. We got the jail thing removed. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is this the FEMA's requirement? Maybe that will help. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: We got the jail time removed, so that was good. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is this a FEMA requirement? MR. WILEY: This language is put in here at the direction of the county attorney. This is not the language from the model ordinance. It is put in here so that we are consistent with what's currently used by code enforcement through — and I hope I say this correctly -- the code enforcement master, whoever that person is. So they're going to be the entity which is -- actually presents to the violator the issue, so it will go through code enforcement. This just duplicates their current process. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. But code enforcement normally is involved with violations that are not of a nature necessarily with this floodplain ordinance, meaning it's not damaged as a result of storm events or flooding. It's more or less complaints about setbacks, hedges -- MR. WILEY: Well, they're involved with violations of our existing codes and ordinances. This happens to Page 29 of 49 1 6 ' 1 e Z Jan g, 6,2011 COMMISSIONER CARON: You have read the entirety, and it goes over onto the next page. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. COMMISSIONER CARON: Because it is a date set for compliance by the special magistrate. So the special magistrate, when they come before them, is going to know that it takes two months in order to get a pennit, never mind get the action done, and will set a date accordingly -- that's what he or she does -- and then if you just don't follow that, I know that you get a chance to go back again and say, oops, I couldn't do it. So you get an extension again by the magistrate, and then if you still are not complying -- I don't know how many chances they give you, but I've watched these hearings; they get plenty of chances to comply. And then at some point, she's finally going to say, well, obviously, you're not trying to comply, so fines kick in. And it's -- you have to get to the end of the sentence before -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But my point is, she's brought in because you build something without a permit. In other words, the actual construction act. The fact that it's a violation of this ordinance may be one of the elements on it. But essentially it violated the master concept of, you built something without a permit. And she's dealing with it already. That's kind of my point is that, why do we have punitive clauses within here? Take your Barefoot Beach. Did they get a permit to build those things under there? MR. WILEY: No, sir, as far as I know. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: There's the problem, not the fact there's -- there may be electrical violations. You don't have to get to the electrical code to get penalized. I mean, there may be tons of other violations in that, one of which might be this FEMA -- well, is this FEMA requirement. So the point is that building without a permit is the problem, so -- COMMISSIONER AHERN: That's the problem. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: -- therefore, I don't know why we need a -- you know, a special little penalty clause in here if there's a master penalty clause it would cover. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I think because Robert -- when I asked that question in the beginning, you said that FEMA required some form of violation paragraph or clause, is that correct? MR. WILEY: We have to be able to have a way to remedy noncompliance. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Then let'sjust reference our county, you know, whatever statute, or whatever clause is there for building without a permit; let'sjust aim it to that and let it be taken up with everything else. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Robert, can that be done`? Heidi, can that be done? MR. WILEY: Talk to Heidi. MS. ASHTON: Could you repeat the question, please. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, what I -- the point is that we're inventing our own little violation process here, and why don't we just piggyback the county's? Because every example he gave of violations of this code are building without a permit. MS. ASHTON: Well, I think -- MR. WILEY: Let me interject here. You asked for an example. I'm not saying that it can't happen someone builds it incorrectly even with a permit. You just asked for a typical example of what I know has happened in a portion of the county. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. So what you're saying is that there could be a case where a project's permitted, it's constructed, it's inspected, it's CO'ed, and then you go back and, oops, the floor's too low? That's a different -- totally different game. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But your solution still fits. We could simply refer -- any violations of this floodplain ordinance will be handled in the same manner as violations of any other ordinance in Collier County, through the code enforcement process, then you're covered. So it doesn't matter for what reason. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Because this never really was necessary. I mean, remember, we had jail time in it at one time. And I like — Mark's comment is, he's sitting on the bunk and, you know, what are you in for? COMMISSIONER CARON: Flooding. MR. WILEY: Well, don't laugh, gentlemen; that's still in effect. That ordinance is still in effect until this one replaces it. Page 31 of 49 1611 A3 , January 6, 2011 take a paragraph and make it a sentence? MR. FRENCH: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I think the requirements of what you should show is good so that somebody preparing those plans knows what you're expecting. MR. FRENCH: Helps us manage expectations. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything else through Page 20? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Yeah. MR. WILEY: So how do I revise it? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Brad. MR. WILEY: What do you want it to say? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Just state in there that you'll -- during the permitting process, will be reviewed -- in other words, application for a development permit shall be reviewed by the floodplain administrator on forms furnished by him. MR. WILEY: Are you getting this? Because I'm going to have to go from what you type. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: It's just getting rid of --the impression of, shall be made to gives the impression that I walk in to Jim and give it to him. I mean, if that's -- I mean, we're really enjoying ourselves too much here, but -- COMMISSIONER CARON: I think so, on that one. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The next question I have is, on 17 you're looking for flood certification by a professional land surveyor or professional engineer. My confusion is, does an engineer — is that the person in the state licensure system you would want to be making or qualifying elevations in buildings? In other words, I think a land surveyor alone is that person. I guess -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: A lot of times these surveyors are employed by an engineering firm. The engineering firm actually is the one that subm is the documents on SDPs that they submitted. So I guess it could be done by either, but they -- one of them -- they'd have to do it through a chain and include a land surveyor. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Yeah, 1 think -- I mean, just check. I mean, if -- you know, and then the reason I bring it up, professional engineers is a big, broad band that it's very difficult for your staff, let alone the public, to differentiate what they're qualified as. And I don't think they're all qualified to establish -- maybe none are -- to establish flood - elevation datums, which is what that's saying. Then the next sentence should makes sense, or further down, but that one first one, I think - -just check and see. If they're allowed by state statute to provide that, that's good. My only other comment is B, paren two, maybe the word verify rather than assure is safer. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Lacking any objection, then we need to move forward with those changes, Robert. COMMISSIONER CARON: Where was it? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: B(2). COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: B(2). CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Second line, verify. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I mean, everywhere else we changed that, you know. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Assure to verify. COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah, okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We did change that other places. We missed it there. Anything else through Page 20? Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: On 20, paren 10, it's, any alteration; that makes sense. Repair, what you're saying is that if you have something that is in violation, you can't further it, extend it, or replace it, but you really do want people to be able to repair their homes. And these are in the general conditions for flood - hazard reduction. So don't you think -- is repair really -- should that be in there, Bob? In other words, what you're really saying is if the paint job on my house is bad but the house is below flood criteria, I'm violating this by chipping off the -- maybe the rotted wood should have given me a clue, but chipping off the rotted wood and fixing it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Bob, you want to react to that? Page 33 of 49 161 1 A 3 January 6, 2011 MS. ASHTON: To capitalize the first letter of each word. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MR. WILEY: And if I'm correct, in the Land Development Code we also put it in a bold font, I think, don't we? MR. FRENCH: Yes. MS. ASHTON: Well, the Land Development Code does bold it. I think if you capitalize the words, that's sufficient, but it's a policy decision how you'd like to do it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Honestly, with the terminology and the definitions different in this document, I think if you were to capitalize and bold them, we'd be in real good shape to know exactly when you're referring to a defined term, and everyone could turn to the front of the book to know that's where the term is. Does anybody think that's a good or bad thing? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: No. And I'd even mentioned that in the intro to definition, so -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Pardon me? COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So people know that. I would mention that in the intro to definitions. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think itjust adds a lot of clarity. And this is going to be a confusing document to begin with when it has to go -- instituted countywide, so -- so we're going to add in the intro that all defined terms will be capitalized and bolded, and then we'll follow that through with the entire document. MS. ASHTON: And the capitalization will just be the first letter of each word, correct? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Correct. Otherwise it looks like one of those big articles in the paper that nobody ever reads. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I have a 23/24 question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Bob, on the bottom of 23 -- and it's just, I think, the way the pages are given to us -- is 4A, and then there's Roman numeral IV, and then at the top of 24, is that paragraph up there, the following that should be attached to Roman numeral IV, correct? The way it's presented here it just seems to be floating, but MR. WILEY: On Page 24, you said? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Look at the bottom of 23 and the bottom of 24. I'm talking about -- this is pure Scribner kind of thing. MR. WILEY: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: The -- is that -- that lowest floor, is that part of Roman numeral IV? MR. WILEY: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. So the end of Roman numeral IV where the parentheses ends, there should be the word, the lowest floor and continue on. It's a little awkward, but -- MR. WILEY: Yeah. It's very awkward there, especially where it flips pages. I don't -- you know, that's just a -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Even the reading of it's awkward, so -- MR. WILEY: Yeah. It's just an automatic page break put in by Word there. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So you're sure it belongs there? This is not a floater? MR. WILEY: Nope, it goes there. It's just a continuing after the comma. After the word flood, it just continues on there. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay, okay. That's it. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else through Page 25? Maybe the lady from the Building Department could answer this better. I don't know. But, Robert, I'll start with you. This manufactured home and mobile home provisions, how do we know or how would it affect the farmworker housing in those areas that are no longer Zone X or D in Immokalee that are flood -- that are, under the new maps, flood zone? Do we -- has anybody checked that to see? Because there's a lot of farmworker housing out there, and they have to move the trailers and modify the housing periodically as their farm fields change. Do we know how this is going to impact those kind of facilities? MR. WILEY: Well, they'll have to be built in compliance with it. So as they're moving it, when they Page 35 of 49 16 I 1 A3 tTanuary 6, 2011 MR. FRENCH: Probably not like a mobile home. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But that -- okay. MR. FRENCH: But most likely they would do probably the 18 -inch drilling stakes, and then they would be ratcheted down or cabled down to prevent them from floating away. Because they are temporary. They're not intended to be a permanent structure like a mobile home could be. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, that's what I was concerned about. To anchor them down like a mobile home, you're getting into a lot of -- but you're saying in lieu of Section 5A4 they could use standards that were certified with the container. See, if you move — turn to Page 19, 1 think that's Section 5A4. MR. WILEY: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And it says, manufactured homes shall be anchored to prevent flotation, et cetera. Methods of anchoring may include, but not limited to, the use of over - the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. It doesn't say that they should be all -- they can also be anchored according to their manufacturer recommendations. But now you're saying the storage containers could be anchored according to the manufacturer recommendations? MR. FRENCH: Well -- and again, I'll refer to Tatiana. But the manufacturer of each of the trailers or the mobile homes, so to speak --just like whether it be a mobile home or whether it be a travel trailer, they give you direction, and that's -- when they submit permits, that's what we inspect to. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Should that latitude be mentioned in 5A4? Because if you're going beyond the manufacturing -- manufactured homes for anchoring by referring to that section in 8G and H, I just want to make sure that -- MR. FRENCH: We could certainly put a clause in there that says, or as defined by the manufacturer of that CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That would be fine, okay. Just as an alternative. MS. GUST: May I suggest some? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure. MS. GUST: In general, we're allowed to use manufacturer specifications or anchoring detail provided by a professional engineer or an architect that will sustain the required wind loads or, in this case, flood. MR. FRENCH: Or flotation. MS. GUST: Right. So it's either way, an architect or a design professional method. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Or the manufacturer's specs. MS. GUST: Or the manufacturer's specs. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's fine. I mean, but 1 would like to see that latitude put in so someone reading it would know that. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And, Tatiana, aren't -- are all sheds like that governed by the building code? I know in the sections of the code I'm on anything, you know, less than 100 feet is not even required to get a permit, but -- MS. GUST: Any structure that is a structure itself is regulated by the building code. Now, for temporary construction, trailers or that type of building, we don't -- we just check accessibility, but they're not required a pemtit for the trailer itself but for the accessibility only. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: All right. Thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: On that same Page 26, 8C, accessory structures shall be constructed and placed on the building site so as to offer the minimum resistance to the flow of floodwaters. How is that determined? MR. WILEY: Well, with us having almost imperceptible flow, it really is not going to be a big deal. But where you are in a situation you do have a flow north to south, you're going to want to put the narrow direction of the building so that the water has a chance to somewhat streamline and go around it. You're not going to want to create a deliberate blockage by putting the width of the building perpendicular to the flow direction. It's not a big issue with us because of our flat conditions. But should the situation be there, this is to address it. Now, let's go back, if we can, to make sure I'm get it clear on what you wanted before. Under G, 8G on Page 26, did you want us to address the issue there of manufacturer specs or put it over in the previous page? Page 37 of 49 161 1 A3 January 6, 2011 MR. WILEY: I'm not going to say it's a definite either way. You'd have to look at the situation. I mean, are you building a very serious structure, or are you building just a little miniature thing? You could look at it depending on what you're building. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Say you're building a 150 - square -foot dock, a dock that has a platform of 150 square feet. MR. WILEY: Okay. And you're going to fully enclose it, walls and a roof? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. You're going to put a canopy over it so that your boat, or while you're sitting out there -- MR. WILEY: Again, there's no walls. It's not a structure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's an accessory then. MR. WILEY: But it's not a structure under this requirement here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What makes it -- so a structure has to have walls and a roof? MR. WILEY: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. A dock box then is -- MR. WILEY: I don't know what a dock box is. I'm not a boater. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's a 6 -foot by 4 -foot by 3- foot -high square box house attached to a dock, has a lid on it and four sides. It wouldn't be a structure? MR. WILEY: That's not a structure, no. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Unless it's a habitable dock box. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, what concerns me is what's on Page 30. 13 B &C, they talk about maximum allowable accessory structures in V zones. We have a lot of docks, and I just wanted to make sure that we weren't inadvertently affecting the square - footage area of the various docks that come in, because all of them have more than 100 square feet, and they're all worth more than $2,500, so — as long as they're not, then I don't have a problem. MR. WILEY: Docks are not structures. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good. Okay. But docks don't fall under this ordinance, but they do have a value that's insurable, I would assume, so -- if they're damaged or wiped out by a storm, so why wouldn't they fall under this ordinance? MR. WILEY: They're not covered by flood insurance. You cannot get flood insurance for a dock. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is that right? MR. WILEY: That's correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Interesting. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: What if it winds up in the neighbor's living room? MR. WILEY: Well, that's your liability insurance. That's not your flood insurance. Flood insurance only repairs damage to structures. MR. FRENCH: If it's your damage. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, let's take 31 -- Page 31 through the balance of the document, which is Page 35. Anybody have any questions from those? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I have some. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Bob, on 32, conditions for variances. The conditions that are listed there, you have to -- do you have to meet all of those or one of those or -- MR. WILEY: Depending upon where you are in the stack, it may reference subsequent sections or it may not. You really need to tell me where you want to talk about it. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. So you have -- in other words, it just is a -- okay. Essentially it really boils down to that it's a one - half -acre site. Anything would have one -half acre, you're never going to get a variance on; is that true? Or -- it's an awkward thing to read. It gets really awkward. 2A -- and I know you've revised it a lot, but back -- and it starts to exclude some things. Anyway, you've read this thing, and you think it covers everything all right? MR. WILEY: What this does is this shows you within our ordinance format the requirements of the federal language. Now, you made a statement that if you're less than a half acre, you can never get a variance. That's not Page 39 of 49 161 1 A 3 January 6, 2011 COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Everything else. MR. WILEY: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You can take it out. COMMISSIONER CARON: Takeout remainder. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Why don't you just say this section? And if I double read the one I'm reading myself, I think I71 double do it. MR. WILEY: I will take out the words, the remainder of, so it would read, without regard to the procedures set forth in this section. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: That would be perfect. MR. WILEY: And I'll go back and check to make sure that is what we intend to say. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: And I've been around a lot of codes, building, the land codes. I've never seen anybody worry about it that way, but -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything else through the end of the document? I have one question back where Brad had started. I had circled the same thing on Page 33, Item A on top. Can you tell me word for word where that's referring to? The criteria of subsection F. First, I guess that takes you to Page 34 with the new subsection F called structures and regulatory floodway; is that correct? MR. WILEY: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Paragraphs 1, 3, and 4 of this Subsection D, which is everything, excluding the section that paragraph is in, 1, 3, and 4, are met. What criteria in Section F are we referring to? There's a statement that's two lines in one sentence. Is there criteria within that statement that you believe somehow -- are we -- I wasn't able to follow it when I was trying to track it back. MR. WILEY: Okay. In a condition allowing for use of a variance, one of the things that you have to follow is what is in that Subsection F, which simply says, variances shall not be issued with any designated floodway if any impact in flood conditions or increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. So if you have a situation with an identified floodway, you cannot grant a variance that would allow something to have that negative impact within the floodway. Now, just as a further clarification so you will note it, Collier County does not currently have any designated floodways on its Flood Insurance Rate Map. The preliminary digital Flood Insurance Rate Map, which is out for public review right now and is coming forward for future adoption, also does not contain any designated floodways. But FEMA has made it very clear we must, in our ordinance, address the floodway potential should there be one declared in the future. They are requiring us to keep the term "floodway" within our ordinance, even though effectively we don't have any for Collier County. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So they're setting us up so that in the future when they declare one, they already have the provisions in place to utilize it. MR. WILEY: If one is ever declared for Collier County. Lee County has them; Collier County does not. I really would not support the concept they're setting us up. It's just a statement of fact, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, now that they are setting us up, can we anticipate the setup by undoing other relationships in this documents so that when they declare floodways all over Collier County we make sure we're as best protected as we possibly can? If we approach it under that concept, is there changes that we could make that would protect us in regards from FEMA's vehemence, let's say, or aggressiveness when they declare floodways throughout Collier County? MR. WILEY: Well -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Would it increase insurance rates to be declared a floodway? MR. WILEY: No, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What would be the impact of declaring something a floodway? MR. WILEY: It has to do with the allowable building that can take place within it that you cannot increase the base flood elevation, knowing what a floodway is. That is the minimum area that you can have without creating that vertical increase, rise in the BFE. And they are not identified in Collier County because we have such flat topography. We are in broad sheet flow. Page 41 of 49 1611 A3 Janua9y 6, 2011 MR. WILEY: Floodplain Management Planning Committee. COMMISSIONER CARON: -- committee would like it to read all utilities. And I think we need to decide. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Could you explain the difference? I mean, I know what a -- public utilities, let's assume, are like sewer and water, and all utilities would now include telephone and cable, so -- MR. FRENCH: And electric. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, electric too, but I mean, there's probably a lot of -- MR. WILEY: The big issue came out of Floodplain Management Planning Committee from our utilities division who did not want people to think that only the utilities provided by the public utilities divisions were applicable and private providers of water and sewage would not be applicable. So they want it to be all utilities so everyone understood we're on the level playing field, and that's where this came from. COMMISSIONER CARON: And the county attorney objects to that because? MS. WHITE: Jennifer White, assistant county attorney, for the record. Frankly, it's been a very long time since this provision has been reviewed by our office, and I don't recall the reason for the difference in language. But I can tell you that we really could defer to the Planning Commission as to what is appropriate. I have no strong feeling one way or the other really. COMMISSIONER CARON: This does have to come back. So if there is something, if you can find a note that says this is why we did this -- right now it is reading all utilities. And I guess we can leave it as all with the caveat that you -all will check and make sure. But you don't have a really legitimate reason why this needs -- MS. ASHTON: I would think the reason that they put public in would be because of the cost of providing governmental services to repair, you know, after flood conditions. That must be why they put public in, because referring to the public facilities, we may or may not have an obligation to repair private, so -- that's my guess, but we can -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Check it out. MS. ASHTON: -- get that information for you. COMMISSIONER CARON: Yeah. It's an important phrase, and I think it does need to be checked. MS. WHITE: Okay. We'll go back through our notes. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Does that wrap it up, guys, girls, ladies, gentlemen? COMMISSIONER CARON: Kids. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would like to now suggest, though, how we want the final draft to come back to us. MR. WILEY: Well, let me -- let me give my comments here. We did get direction from the Planning Commission about -- you wanted to specifically address floodproofing to the base flood elevation or to 1 foot above base flood elevation. You specifically asked me to come back with some cost implications for it. So I wanted to make sure we went over that so we can have that on the benefit for the record. You sent us back to DSAC to specifically get their input in giving us an example. So through great reluctance they finally did agree to do so. I mean, Nick jumped in in the conversation, because they weren't going to be of assistance at all. And Nick said, folks, Robert's directed to come back to you for this, so you've got to help us out here. So they finally did. I got one example given to me. It says, assuming they have a typical 5,000 - square -foot retail building with storefront windows to the floor on the front, some on each side, two exit doors on the rear and a double -door entry, that's the typical building example they were giving. That was developed by one of the architects on DSAC. It was then handed over to another member of DSAC to come up with a cost estimate to floodproof that. He says, looking at a cost of about 45,000 to floodproof up to 12 inches. And I'm not sure why he came this way, but that's what he did. So he'd going to floodproof it up a foot. Then I said, well, that's really not the question. The question is not floodproofing for 12 inches. The question is floodproofing an additional 12 inches above BFE. He said, okay. So if he assumed he was -- he then said, let's assume then that just to get to BFE I had to floodproof it to 12 inches. I said, okay. We'll use that assumption. So he says, to build a building, he's got $45,000 to floodproof it at 12 inches. To go floodproof it up to 24 inches, he said, add an additional 70 percent to the cost. So floodproofing at that Page 43 of 49 161 1 A3 January 6, 2011 COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. MR. WILEY: -- notjust the dry floodproofing consideration for nonresidential. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So the only -- MR. WILEY: It's a different criteria. When you seem to say freeboard, then dry floodproofing it's -- it seems to be the same for that one particular building, but freeboard would address everything. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So by utilizing -- encouraging a freeboard now, we're not gaining a CRS standard; we're just forcing people to save money on their flood insurance; is that -- MR. WILEY: You are giving them an opportunity to save money on their flood insurance if they have to purchase it or choose to purchase it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Why was the DSAC reluctant to respond to you in your request from this board? MR. WILEY: Every building is different, as Mr. Schiffer has stated, so they did not want to give the impression that this is just what it's always going to cost you. Every building is unique, criteria, even how you would choose to address the floodproofing. So ultimately they finally said, okay, we'll just give you a typical example and make sure to explain it as a typical example, not a specific building in mind. Even going to the 24 inches, just depending upon the style of the building, could have grave differences in cost factors, depending upon what you choose to do, and which is what Mr. Schiffer was saying before in our conversation. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I'mjust surprised that the industry didn't want to weigh in more strongly on this whole process anyway without having to be asked, and when -- to be asked and then be -- not want to respond. Go ahead, Melissa. COMMISSIONER AHERN: I was at that DSAC meeting, and I talked to members after our meeting. And, you know, they recommended adding the note and not forcing it due to the cost. And so I think that was part of their issue, not that they didn't want to address it. But the cost is so variable that it's hard to pin it down, which is why they chose to go with the note and give people the option instead of -- because that 30,000, depending on the building, can easily get into the hundreds. So that was the specific reason for them going with the note as opposed to enforcing the 1 foot. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, I think it would be easier to deal with it under that term now, but when we go to a CRS change, we'd probably have to look at a more binding requirement versus a note. So anybody have any -- Brad? COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Well, I mean, I think, you know, the payback's rather -- extremely beneficial. You know, in the design of that building, you know, they don't have to bring the windows to the floor and stuff like that -- could have saved some money. So I'm a fan of trying to push it where -- I mean, isn't the smart thing to do to put it 1 foot above the base flood elevation? I mean, the reason the insurance rates are a lot less is because of wave action and everything else, right? MR. WILEY: The insurance requirement is, if you use dry floodproofing on the building, you initially look at the building and substract 1 foot from the top elevation of dry floodproofing. That's how you rate the building. So if you build it with the building, floodproof to the BEE, as soon as you go to buy flood insurance, you're automatically rated at 1 foot below BFE. That's just standard. That is right in the flood- insurance manual. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. So essentially you're rated not compliant? MR. WILEY: You are rated noncompliant, yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: So what we would do by making the freeboard requirement or the 1 -foot requirement is we'd make all the buildings comply. MR. WILEY: For flood insurance side of it. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I mean, I guess my question is, do we want people to have the free will to make that decision, or do we want the government to tell them to make that decision? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But I think there's two stages in which we can make that determination. One is now, or one is by the CRS modifications that we package up in the future to see if it's worth it on a countywide basis. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: But the CRS would -- has much more meaning. If you put a 1 -foot freeboard on the -- essentially you would move this thing up another foot, too. Page 45 of 49 1611A3 January 6, 2011 better. So I like the idea of an option COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Okay. But in our ordinance we -- you have brackets there where you do point that out to them? MR. WILEY: Right now in the ordinance it is bracketed and in bold. COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: Right. So I guess we're doing our job. I'm comfortable. MR. WILEY: It's just a note. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then we're going to leave it like it is. Now, process for the next time. It's nice to have all these little bubbled on the right column and the light blue and the strikethroughs and the underlines and the dots and all the other stuff, but I think since you're going to go back and reformat this with capitalization and bolding for definition and you're going to edit those areas that this board now has boiled it down to for our concerns, and we're the last board that's going to see it, I would just as soon that -- and I don't know -- I'm asking the rest of this board, that we eliminate all of the other items in here and just now focus on the -- what we've just asked, which is the handful of changes -- well, actually, there's been quite a few changes -- we've suggested making, the new ones the county attorney makes, and do away with all the right - column bubble, you know, comments and all the rest of it, do away with all the different colors and strikethrough, but focus on just those items that we've now changed so that we can read this in somewhat of a clean format except for what happened today. Is that -- COMMISSIONER SCHIFFER: I'm good. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We always got this document to keep. In case we start questioning something again, we can pull back and look at this one to make sure it wasn't already questioned and changed because of a prior action. So I think that gets us there. MR. WILEY: And the easiest way to do that is just simply take this current document, accept all changes, then edit it to reflect comments from today. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I agree. That's what I'm -- MR. WILEY: That's what it sounds like you're saying. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I want to make sure the rest of the board accepted that and didn't want a continuation of all these comments on the right column, so -- COMMISSIONER CARON: No. I think if we didn't comment on any of the comments to the right, then we've accepted them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. That's what I meant. MR. WILEY: Now, I do have a question then when I go to the Board of County Commissioners. Do you want the Board of County Commissioners to have the benefit of seeing everybody's comments up to this point or just yours? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's a staff policy. I could care less. I mean, whatever the board wants you normally to do. You guys produce executive summaries constantly to that board. So whatever you think they want, you need to give them. I can't speak for them. MR. FRENCH: We could bring that back up when we bring this document back to you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. I mean, if I was a -- if I was a board member there, I'd want to see a clean version, because my assumption is, it would have been thoroughly vetted by the various subcommittees, and I'm reading a clean version. Why would I want all the jibberjabber in between? But, anyway, that's up to them. Anybody else have any comments? Then I think we are about done. No new business? Go ahead. Diane? COMMISSIONER EBERT: Yeah. I'm going to ask Mr. French, because there are three new people on the Planning Commission, could we come in like a day or two before the Planning Commission and have some of our questions answered? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You can't do it as a group, that's for sure. COMMISSIONER EBERT: So you have to make an appointment individually? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Is there -- can we go through some of the procedures? MR. FRENCH: I think that that would actually be a great idea. Almost -- not necessarily like a Page 47 of 49 1611A3 January 6, 2011 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 11:45 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MARK S RAIN, CHAIRMAN These minutes approved by the board on y as presented _ or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC BY TERRI LEWIS, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY. Page 49 of 49 Fiala A 16 � �, 4 enning RECEIVED October 20, 2010 Coyle NOV 18 2010 Coletta Ba »M of County commissioners MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTORS' LICENSING BOARD Naples, Florida, October 20, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Contractors' Licensing Board, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Administrative Building "F," 3rd floor, Collier County Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Thomas Lykos Vice Chair: Kyle Lantz Michael Boyd Lee Horn Terry Jerulle Richard Joslin Robert Meister Jon Walker Patrick White (Excused) ALSO PRESENT: Patrick Neale, Esq., Attorney for the Board Robert Zachary, Esq., Assistant County Attorney Michael Ossorio, Contractors' Licensing Supervisor Ian Jackson, License Compliance OfficeK4isc. corres. Thomas Keegan, License Compliance Officer i bete: I+�3 Item 0: l 1 1 ccnm to: 161 1A4 October 20, 2010 Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes that testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. I. ROLL CALL: Chairman Lykos called the meeting to order at 9:02 AM and read the procedures to be followed to appeal a decision. Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. II. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS: Changes: • Item VIII, "Public Hearings " — Case #2010 -05, Albert E. Schmidt, was deleted because the complaint had been withdrawn. • Item V, "Discussion, " will be heard following "Public Hearings. " Vice Chairman Lantz moved to approve the changes to the Agenda. Second by Mr. Joslin. Carried unanimously, 8 -0. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Vice Chairman Lantz moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by Mr. Joslin. Carried unanimously, 8 -0. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —September 13,2010: Vice Chairman Lantz moved to approve the Minutes of the September 13, 2010 Board meeting as submitted. Second by Mr. Joslin. Carried unanimously, 8 -0. VL NEW BUSINESS: (A) Orders of the Board (Signing) Mr. Joslin moved to approve the signing of the Orders of the Board by the Chairman. Second by Mr. Jerulle. Carried unanimously, 8 -0. (Note: In each of the cases heard under Sections VI and VII, as follows, the individual(s) to testify were sworn in) (B) Paul Gearing— Quality 2nd Entity Ian Jackson, License Compliance Officer, presented the following information: • Mr. Gearing is a Flooring and a Tile/Marble Contractor • He has qualified "Gearing Floors- to -Go" • He applied to qualify Hadinger Flooring as a Tile /Marble Qualifier as a Second Entity • Staff recommendation: approval of the application 16 I 1 A4 io October 20, 2010 Michael Ossorio, Contractors' Licensing Supervisor, noted Hadinger Flooring has a floor - covering license but is missing the tile /marble component. The company had a qualifier previously. A Citation was issued and the fine was paid. Richard Joslin moved to approve Mr. Gearing application to qualify Hadinger Flooring as a Tile/Marble Qualifier (Second Entity). Second by Robert Meister. Carried unanimously, 8 -0. Mr. Gearing was advised to submit the original application to the Licensing Department for processing. (C) Jeff Stahlman — Contesting Citations Citations: #5610 and #5711 Date: August 25, 2010 and September 7, 2010 Description of Violation: Engage in the business or act in the capacity of a Contractor, or advertise self or business organization as available to engage in the business, or act in the capacity of a contractor without being duly registered or certified. Mr. Stahlman presented his case: • When he received the Citations he was unlicensed • He has been licensed since 1987 • After he received the Citations, he passed the Tree Trimming Test and provide proof and of insurance • On October 16`h, he took the Business and Law Test which he passed • The last two required steps to obtain his license: to obtain a credit check and pay the fees /fines • He did not renew his license in 2008 due to problems renewing insurance • There was a family emergency in September Ian Jackson provided the following summary: • Citations #5610 was issued on August 25, 2010 by Ian Jackson and Citation #5711 was issued September 7, 2010 by License Compliance Officer Thomas Keegan • In 1999, Mr. Stahhnan was originally licensed for Tree Removal and Trimming and the Certificate expired in 2002 • In 2006, Mr. Stahlman was issued a second Certificate for Tree Removal and Trimming which expired in 2008 • The Licensing Departments for the County and the City of Naples received anonymous complaints concerning tree work being done by Mr. Stahlman on Sixth Street South • Mr. Stahlman was not licensed while performing tree work on August 25, 2010 and admitted receiving compensation from the homeowner 161 1 A4 October 20, 2010 Attorney Patrick Neale reviewed relevant points from Florida Statutes, Title XXXII, "Regulation of Professions and Occupations, " Chapter 489, Section 127 entitled "Prohibitions, penalties ": "If the person issued the Citation, or his /her designated representative, shows that the Citation is invalid or the violation has been corrected prior to appearing before the Enforcement or Licensing Board, the Enforcement or Licensing Board may dismiss the Citation unless the violation is irreparable or irreversible. " "If the Enforcement or Licensing Board or designated Special Magistrate finds that a violation exists, the Enforcement /Licensing Board may order the violator to pay a civil penalty of not less than the amount set forth on the Citation but not more than $1,000 per day for each violation. " "In determining the amount of the penalty, the Enforcement or Licensing Board shall consider the following factors: I. The gravity of the violation. 2. Any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation. 3. Any previous violations committed by the violator." Mr. Joslin noted Mr. Stahlman had received several Citations since 2002 and paid fines for three. He asked since Mr. Stahlman knew he was not allowed to work without a license, why he had not yet obtained it? Mr. Stahlman stated he experienced several personal problems including legal issues and completed rehabilitation through the Salvation Army. He noted in 2006 he was licensed as a sole proprietor but the law changed in 2007, and he was required to incorporate. He did not realize that corporations were renewed on a yearly basis. He also cited problems with renewing his insurance coverage and reiterated he passed the required tests for reinstatement. He also admitted receiving Citations since 2008. Chairman Lykos noted the records provided by Staff indicated Mr. Stahlman had received four Citations for working without a licenses, a Citation was avoided in 2003 because an invoice was not presented to a Condo Association, in addition to the two under discussion. He further noted the Board does not have the option to waive the Citations because the infractions were not corrected prior to the Hearing. Mr. Stahlman stated he has obtained insurance but not have Workers' Compensation Insurance. Ian Jackson noted the State classifies tree trimming as "non- construction" work and Worker's Compensation coverage is not required until a certain threshold of employees is reached. Chairman Lykos reviewed the Statutes' language regarding penalties. It was noted Mr. Stahlman passed the Tree Trimming and Removal exam on June 19, 11 16l 1 A4 October 20, 2010 2010 and the Business and Law test on October 16, 2010. Terry Jerulle stated Mr. Stahlman had an unfair advantage over the licensed Contractors since he could under -bid them for jobs. Ian Jackson noted the second Citation, dated September 7, 2010, should be considered separately from the Citation under discussion. Vice Chairman Lantz stated it was clear that Mr. Stahlman knew the law and it was his choice to violate it. He supported the Citation and fine as issued Staff recommendation: to uphold Citation #5610 issued on August 25, 2010 Lee Horn moved to uphold Citation #5610. Second by Michael Boyd Carried unanimously, 8 -0. Chairman Lykos noted the fine for the first Citation was $500 and asked the Board if it should remain or be increased. He reminded the Board the fine amount could not be lower than $500. Mr. Stahlman withdrew his petition concerning the second Citation. Michael Ossorio noted the County would not object. A discussed ensued on whether or not to alter the amount of the fine. Chairman Lykos pointed out: • August 5, 2002 — a $300 Citation was issued • January, 2004 — a $500 Citation was issued for operating without a license • In 2006, Mr. Stahlman obtained a license • In April, 2010, he was cited for $300 for working without a license • In May, 2010, he was cited for $500 again — he has paid $800 to date in 2010 for working without a license • Two more Citations were issued in 2010 Richard Joslin noted there were some extenuating circumstances that contributed to Mr. Stahlman's inability to obtain a license. He stated the current penalty is appropriate and if Mr. Stahlman returns to the Board, the Board should refuse to grant him a license. Mr. Ossorio stated since all tests were passed, the license could be issued quickly. Mr. Stahlman asked for an extension of two weeks to apply for his license in order to obtain the funds to apply for a credit check, pay the fines for 2009 and 2010, and the fees to obtain the license. Chairman Lykos stated the County advocates to the public that licensed contractors are held to a higher standard and the standard cannot be allowed to slip due to extenuating circumstances. The Board must protect the integrity of what it means to hold a license in this County and protect the homeowners who hire licensed trades to perform work in the premises. He further stated Mr. Stahlman put people and property at risk by operating without a license and perpetuated the attitude that it is acceptable to hire the person offering the lowest bid. He continued the Board can not prevent homeowners from hiring unlicensed and uninsured individuals but the Board can hold the trades accountable. He concluded 161 1 A4 October 20, 2010 that, based on the history presented, a fine of $500 was not enough. Vice Chairman Lantz asked Mr. Stahlman how he was going earn the funds necessary to pay for the fines and fees. Mr. Stahlman stated he worked for a licensed Contractor previously and will call him to ask for work. Chairman Lykos moved to approve increasing the Citation fine to $1,000. Second by Mr. Jerulle. Motion carried, 7 — "Yes " /1— "No." Opposed by Mr. Joslin. Michael Ossorio introduced Roger Jacobson, Manager of the City of Naples Code Enforcement Department and asked him to speak to the Board concerning the Inter - Local Agreement. Mr. Jacobson stated the City of Naples works hand -in -hand with the County's Contractor Licensing Department whenever there is a contractor issue. (D) Daniel Natvig— Request to Waive Examination to Reinstate License Daniel Natvig presented his case: • Due to a clerical error, only the occupational license was renewed in 2009 • When he applied to renew in 2010, he was informed the cabinet installation license had expired • He has carried a Painter's Contractor License for the past 13 years • The purpose of obtaining the Cabinet and Trim Installation License is to enable him to perform decorative cabinet trim as required in conjunction with painting jobs Ian Jackson outlined background information: • Mr. Natvig passed the Business and Law exam in 1997 • His last Certificate was not renewed in 2008 • From October 1 through December 31, 2008 — the Certificate was considered to be "delinquent" • From January 1 through December 31, 2009 — the Certificate was considered to be "suspended" • From January 1, 2010 — the Certificate became "null and void" • The Ordinance requires re- testing since the license was issued in 1997 • If testing is done within a 3 -year time frame, the Certificate can be issued without a re -test Michael Ossorio stated: • Mr. Natvig has been in business for many years as a licensed Contractor and owns a painting company, Nitebay, Inc., in Naples • He also owns a cabinet company in Ft. Myers • Staff recommendation: reinstatement of the license without requiring a re -test .obi IA4 4 October 20, 2010 Attorney Neal cited Collier County Ordinance 22 -184, "Standards for the Issuance or Denial of a Certificate of Competency," as follows: (c) When an application is referred to the Contractors' Licensing Board, the Board shall take testimony from the applicant and shall consider other relevant evidence regarding whether the application meets the requirements of this division. The board may consider the applicant's relevant recent experience in the specific trade and based upon such experience may waive testing requirements if convinced that the applicant is qualified by experience whereby such competency testing would be superfluous." Michael Ossorio stated Mr. Natvig has been in business for many years and did not have an issue with reinstating his license without requiring that he take an exam. Jon Walker moved to approve the Applicant's request to waive the requirement to take an examination. Second by Richard Joslin. Carried unanimously, 8 -0. Mr. Ossorio reminded Mr. Natvig all fees must be paid in order for his application to be processed. VII. OLD BUSINESS: (A) Marisol Santos —Review of Credit Report (Six -Month Review) Chairman Lykos noted Ms. Santos had been granted a probationary license and asked her to provide an update concerning her credit report. Ms. Santos stated: • Arbor Care Specialists, Inc. has been in business for one year • She is establishing a client base and is in the process of establishing credit with vendors • After the two -year anniversary, she will attempt to purchase business equipment on credit • Her personal credit score has improved and she has a cell phone payment plan which is new credit • Some old items were paid off and removed from one credit agency and not from the others • She stated a number of small bills have been paid and the larger bills will be paid in the future It was noted: • Personal Credit Report Summary, dated August 17, 2010, did not specify a credit score i6 l 1A4 4 October 20, 2010 • Personal Credit Report Summary, dated January 25, 2010, specified a credit score was 609 • All searches for liens, judgments and bankruptcies were negative on both Report Summaries • The number of delinquent accounts has been reduced and past due amounts have been reduced by approximately 10% Chairman Lykos noted some incremental improvement and suggested continuing the probation to allow for additional improvement. Chairman Lykos moved to approve continuing the probationary license status of Marisol Santos and requested that she return in six months (April, 2011) to provide a credit status report. Second by Terry Jerulle. Motion carried, 7 — "Yes 11/1 — "No. " Vice Chairman Lantz was opposed. BREAK: 10:03 AM RESUMED: 10:12 AM VIII. PUBLIC HEARING: (A) Case 2010 — 04: John P. Gorman, d/b /a P.M.S. International Trading, Inc. John P. Gorman, the Respondent, was sworn in. Thomas Keegan, License Compliance Officer, appeared on behalf of the County and was sworn in. Chairman Lykos outlined the manner in which the Public Hearing will be conducted: • Hearings will be conducted pursuant to the procedures contained in Collier County Ordinance #90 -105, as amended, and Florida Statutes, Title XXXII, "Regulation of Professions and Occupations, " Chapter 489. • Hearings are quasi-judicial in nature. • Formal "Rules of Evidence" shall not apply. • Fundamental fairness and due process shall be observed and govern the proceedings. • Irrelevant, immaterial or cumulative evidence shall be excluded. • All other evidence of the type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons shall be admissible, whether or not such evidence would be admissible in a trial in the Courts of the State of Florida. • Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining any evidence but shall not be deemed sufficient by itself to support a Finding, unless such hearsay would be admissible over objection in a civil action in Court. • The "Rules of Privilege" shall be effective to the same extent that such Rules are now, or hereafter may be, recognized in civil actions. 16I 1_ October 20, 2010 • Any member of the Contractors' Licensing Board may question any witness before the Board. • Each party to the proceedings shall have the right to call and examine witnesses, to introduce Exhibits, to cross - examine witnesses to impeach any witness regardless of which party called the witness to testify, and to rebut any evidence presented against the party. • The Chair or, in his/her absence, the Vice Chair, shall have all powers necessary to conduct the proceedings at the Hearing in a full, fair, and impartial manner, and to preserve order and decorum. • The general process of the Hearing is for the County to present an Opening Statement to set forth the charges and, in general terms, how the County intends to prove the charges. • The Respondent will present his/her Opening Statement setting forth, in general terms, defenses to the charges. • The County will present its case in chief by calling witnesses and presenting evidence. • The Respondent may cross - examine the witnesses. • After the County has closed its case in chief, the Respondent may present his /her defense as described previously, i.e., to call /examine witnesses, etc. • After the Respondent has presented his/her case, the County will present a rebuttal to the Respondent's presentation. • When the Rebuttal is concluded, each party is permitted to present a Closing Statement. • The County is allowed a second opportunity to rebut the Respondent's Closing Statement. • The Board will close the Public Hearing and begin deliberations. • Prior to beginning deliberations, the Board's Attorney will give a "charge" to the Board, similar to the charge given to a jury, setting forth the parameters on which the decision will be based. • During deliberations, the Board can request additional information and clarification from the parties. • The Board will decide two issues: • Whether the Respondent is guilty of the offense as charged in the Administrative Complaint. A vote will be taken on the matter. • If the Respondent is found guilty, the Board must decide the sanctions to be imposed. • The Board's Attorney will advise the Board concerning the sanctions and the factors to be considered. • The Board will discuss the sanctions and vote. • After the matters are decided, the ChairNice Chair will read a Summary of the Order to be issued by the Board. The Summary is a basic outline of the Order and may not reflect the same language contained in the Final Order. • The Final Order will include complete details as required under State laws and procedures. 161 A4 a October 20, 2010 Mr. Keegan presented the County's Opening Statement: • He introduced the County's Evidence Packet which he requested to be admitted into evidence. • The County will prove that John P. Gorman did contract and perform work outside the scope of his Carpentry License. Richard Joslin moved to approve admitting the County's Evidence packet submitted for Case 2010 -04 into evidence. Second by Terry Jerulle. Carried unanimously, 8 -0. Respondent's Opening Statement: • Resides in Royal Bay Villas, Sandpiper Street, Naples, Florida • Has been in the construction industry for 31 years and holds several qualifications • Appeared before the Contractors' Licensing Board on August 20, 2008 to ask questions concerning carpenters working on the installation of windows • Determination: a Carpentry License does not permit the holder to install windows • During the Hearing, it was also mentioned that carpenters who install windows usually work under the direction of a General Contractor, i.e., under the umbrella license of the General Contractor • In February 2010, he was contacted by two elderly owners at Royal Bay Villas requesting that he install replacement windows in their units • He contacted a General Contractor for advice /guidance on the project and the required Permits • He has worked with the General Contractor on previous projects • Required paperwork was submitted, a Permit was approved, and the windows were ordered • On the day of installation, Thomas Keegan informed him that he could not install the replacement windows even though he was working under a General Contractor • He finished the work in progress as instructed by Mr. Keegan • He would not have started the project if he had known he was not permitted to perform the work • The complaint was made to the Contractor Licensing Department by an individual who has complained about him to Collier County for the past three years in retaliation because the Respondent is a member of the Board of Directors of the Royal Bay Villas Condo Association. Mr. Keegan presented the County's case: • He described the County's Exhibits as follows: • E -1 through E -3: Administrative Complaint and Case Summary • E 4: Notice of Hearing, dated August 23, 2010, signed by Respondent • E -18: Statement from Gabriel R. Michalup, qualifier of Total Contracting, LLC, in which he admitted having no contact with the homeowner and his only responsibility was to obtain the Building Permit for P.M.S. International Trading, Inc. • E -20 through E -27: Photographs of work by Respondent and his assistant 10 1611 A4 October 20, 2010 o E -28 through E -30: Pages 1, 15, and 18 respectively of Collier County Ordinance 92006 -46 which reference the specific violations The Case Summary (`B -3") was read into the Record o The Respondent is the qualifier of P.M.S. International Trading, Inc. The Respondent was served a Notice of Violation on August 23, 2010, for violation of Section 4.1.2 of Ordinance #2002 -23, as amended, which states: "Contracting to do any work outside the scope of his/her competency as listed on his /her Competency Card and as defined in the Ordinance or as restricted by the Contractors' Licensing Board. " [The Respondent did not question Mr. Keegan.] The Respondentpresented his case: • Referenced Page 12 of the transcript of the August 20, 2008 meeting of the Contractor Licensing Board for the Chairman's statement: "...every time I've seen a carpenter doing windows, it's under the direction and the umbrella of a General Contractor or a Building Contractor who has pulled the Permit for the entire job. " • The Chairman's statement summarized the Respondent's belief of how a contractor /subcontractor relationship worked • He was aware he could not pull Permits under his Carpentry License • He has worked for /with Total Contracting on other projects • He discussed this particular project at length with Total Contracting due changes in the Fire Code concerning egress windows and it took approximately four months to obtain approval through the East Naples Fire Department • He thought he was doing everything that was required correctly Questions from the Board: • Did Mr. Michalup personally supervise the installation of the windows or did Total Contractingjust pull the Permit? Respondent: He had been out previously — we discussed the project and the types of windows, but he has been to Royal Bay Villas several times. • Did Mr. Michalup inspect your work on other projects when you worked for him? Respondent: He is very thorough and has in the past checked up on things. • But on this job, he didn't? Respondent: It was the first day — it was 11:00 in the morning and he hadn't been out yet. • What was the value of the job? Respondent: $2,600 or $2,400 — it was below the Notice of Commencement level. • Who paid for the windows? Respondent: The owners purchased the windows directly. 16I1A4 October 20, 2010 Who submitted the data for the windows when you applied for the Permit? Respondent: The window company supplied the data because they were new windows. Mr. Walker referred to County's Exhibit 12 (Page 11 of the transcript) and noted Michael Ossorio's statement: "... And I don't think a carpentry contractor, in general, should not (sic) be putting windows, replacement windows, on a 20 floor high - rise. He's got to realize, Mr. Gorman, that what we do here is life safety. " The Respondent stated he knew if he was offered a job that required a Permit, he must go through a General Contractor. Chairman Lykos pointed out: • A person who qualifies for a Carpentry License only does not have the skills or training to replace exterior windows and/or doors. • A General Contractor pulled the Permit, but that did not change the fact was the people doing the installation had not proven their skills or ability through licensure testing, • Pulling a permit is not the same as having a General Contractor oversee and manage the installation. • The homeowner did not sign a contract with the General Contractor. • It appeared that every possible corner that could be cut was cut to save money and/or expedite the process. o The General Contractor was not involved in the contract or in the installation process o The homeowner paid directly for the windows. • The value of the windows is to be considered in the total value of the job but was omitted to avoid filing a Notice of Commencement. • By not filing a Notice of Commencement, the ability to file a lien against the property was compromised. Michael Ossorio was asked to explain the type of license required by Collier County to install windows and who was qualified to do so. • Building Contractor or Residential Home Contractor • General Contractor • Glass and Glazing Contractor Michael Ossorio stated Mr. Gorman has a history of working without a license in other instances, i.e., he received a Citation for working as a painter. He further stated the Respondent was given direction by the Board in 2008 to obtain a Glass and Glazing License. The Respondent stated he never had a written contract whenever he worked for Total Contracting — there were only verbal agreements between them. 12 1b i P4 4 October 20, 2010 There was a discussion concerning how the Contractor members on the Board conducted business — large jobs require written contracts and smaller jobs are just a handshake between the parties. A member asked why the General Contractor was not present. Mr. Ossorio stated a formal Administrative Complaint will be made through the Department of Professional Business Regulations against Total Contracting for aiding and abetting an unlicensed contractor after the issue has been settled. There may be Workers' Compensation violation as well If the General Contractor does not obtain a Certificate of Completion, it will be considered as a willful Code violation. . Mr. Keegan presented the County's Closing Statement: • The County has shown that Mr. Gorman was working outside the scope of his Carpentry License by performing glass and glazing work. • The County will defer to the Board's decision in the matter. The Respondent presented his Closing Statement: • He assured the Board the situation would never be repeated. Chairman Lykos stated deliberations would begin. Attorney Neale outlined the deliberation procedures: • The Board shall exclude from its deliberations irrelevant, immaterial and cumulative evidence. • The Board shall admit and consider all other evidence of a type normally relied upon by a reasonably prudent person. • The Standard of Proof: The County must present evidence to prove its case in a clear and convincing manner. • The Board must find the Facts that show the violation was actually committed by the Respondent. • The Facts must also show, to a clear and convincing standard, the legal conclusion that the Respondent was in violation of the relevant sections of the Ordinance. • The Board may decide upon only the charges presented, as they are the only charges for which the Respondent had an opportunity to prepare a defense. • Any damages found must be directly related to the charges presented. • The decision by the Board shall be stated orally at the Hearing and is effective upon being read by the Board • If found in violation, the Respondent has certain appeal rights as set out in the County's Ordinance and in Florida Statutes and Rules. • If the Board is unable to issue a decision immediately following the Hearing, the Board may withhold its decision until a subsequent meeting. • The Board shall vote based upon the evidence presented in all areas and, if it finds the Respondent to be in violation, adopt the Administrative Complaint. • The Board shall make Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in support of the charges contained in the Administrative Complaint. 13 161 144 October 20, 2010 Lee Horn moved to close the Public Hearing. Second by Richard Joslin. Carried unanimously, 8 -0. Richard Joslin noted the Respondent had been advised during the August 20, 2008 Hearing to obtain a Glass and Glazing License if he wanted to install windows since it was not permitted under his Carpentry License. He was notified two years ago and he clearly went outside the scope of his license. Chairman Lykos reminded the Board the first responsibility was to determine if the Respondent was guilty of the charge. Discussion ensued. Consensus: The General Contractor is just as guilty as the Respondent and should be brought before the Board. Richard Joslin moved as follows: In Case #2010 -04, Collier Certificate Number 33015, Collier County versus John P. Gorman, d1b /a P.M.S. International Trading, Inc., the Respondent is found guilty of Count I, Section 4.1.2, of the Administrative Complaint, "Contracting to do any work outside the scope of his/her competency as listed on his/her competency card and as defined in the Ordinance or as restricted by the Contractors' Licensing Board " Second by Lee Horn. Carried unanimously, 8 -0. Chairman Lykos asked for a recommendation from Staff concerning sanctions. • Civil penalty /fine of $2,500 to be paid within thirty days, • Costs for investigation: $750 to be paid within thirty days, • If payment is not made within thirty days, the Certificate will be revoked, • One year probation during which all jobs must be reported to the County. Attorney Neale outlined options concerning the sanctions to be imposed: • Revocation of the Certificate of Competency, • Suspension of said Certificate, • Denial of the issuance or renewal of a Certificate of Competency, • Probation of reasonable length not to exceed two years during which the Contractor's activities shall be supervised by the Contractors' Licensing Board and /or participation in a duly- accredited program of continuing education, • Restitution, • Fines not to exceed $5,000, • Public reprimand, • Re- examination requirement, 14 16i 1 Ah 4 October 20, 2010 • Denial of the issuance of Permits or requiring conditional issuance of Permits, • Payment of reasonable legal and investigative costs. He noted the Board must consider the following: • the gravity of the violation, • the impact of the violation, • any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation, • any previous violations committed, • any other evidence presented at the Hearing by the parties relevant to the Sanctions as appropriate The Board shall also issue a recommended penalty to the State's Board as follows. • No further action, or • Suspension, revocation or restriction of the Certification or Registration, or • A fine to be levied by the State's Board. A status report on the project was requested. Mr. Keegan stated Total Contracting took over the project and installed the windows. A final inspection will be conducted before the Certificate of Completion is issued. Attorney Neale reiterated the Board can only consider the evidence presented in the case when determining Mr. Gorman's liability. Chairman Lykos moved to accept Staff's recommendation to impose fines in the amount of $2,500 and investigative costs of $750 to be paid within thirty (30) days or the Respondent's Certificate will be revoked, and imposition of a one-year probation during which time all jobs must be reported to the County's Licensing Staff. Second by Richard Joslin. Motion carried, 7— "Yes "W — "No." Vice Chair Lantz was opposed. Chairman Lykos stated: "This Cause came on for public hearing before the Contractors' Licensing Board on October 20, 2010 for consideration of the Administrative Complaint filed against John P. Gorman, d/b /a P.M.S. International Trading, Inc., Certificate #33015. Service of the Complaint was made in accordance with Collier County Ordinance #90 -105, as amended. The Board having heard testimony under oath, received evidence, and heard arguments respective to all appropriate matters at the Hearing, thereupon issues its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as follows: Findings of Fact: • John P. Gorman, d/b /a P.M. S. International Trading, Inc., is the holder of record of Collier County Certificate Number 33015. • The Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, Contractors' Licensing Board is the Petitioner (Complainant) in this matter. 15 161 1 k4 c her 20, 2010 • The Board has jurisdiction of the person of the Respondent. • Respondent, John P. Gorman, d/b /a P.M.S. International Trading, Inc., was present and was not represented by Counsel at the Public Hearing held on October 20, 2010. • All notices required by Collier County Ordinance #90 -105, as amended, were properly issued and personally delivered. • The Respondent acted in a manner that was in violation of Collier County Ordinances and was the one who committed the act. • The allegations set forth in Administrative Complaint as to Count 1, 4.1.2, "Contracting to do any work outside the scope of his/her competency as listed on his /her competency card and as defined in the Ordinance or as restricted by the Contractors' Licensing Board" have been found to be supported by the evidence presented at the Hearing. Conclusions of Law: • The Conclusions of Law alleged and set forth in the Administrative Complaint as to Count I, 4.1.2, have been approved, adopted and incorporated herein, to wit: o The Respondent violated Section 4.1.2 of Collier County Ordinance #90 -105, as amended, in the performance of his contracting business in Collier County by acting in violation of the Section set out in the Administrative Complaint with particularity. Order of the Board: • Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and pursuant to the authority granted in Chapter 489, Florida Statutes, and Collier County Ordinance #90 -105, as amended, by a vote of 7 in favor and one opposed, a majority vote of the Board members present, the Respondent has been found in violation as set out above. • Further, it is hereby ordered by a vote of 7 in favor and one opposed, a majority vote of the Board members present, that the following disciplinary actions, sanctions, and related Orders are hereby imposed upon the holder of Collier County Certificate of Competency Number 33015. • The Sanctions are: • Imposition of a fine of $2,500 to be paid within thirty days, • Imposition of investigative costs of $750 to be paid within thirty days, • If the fine and costs are not paid within thirty days, the Certificate of Competency #33015 will be revoked. o The license holder will be on probation for a period of one year during which time all jobs are to be reported to the County's Licensing Staff, Chairman Lykos explained the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order to the Respondent. Mr. Gorman stated he would hand in his Certificate at the end of the month. He stated the fine was too severe and he could not pay them. 16 1611A4 4 October 20, 2010 Chairman Lykos advised the Respondent to contact the Licensing Staff to make arrangements. Chairman Lykos stated the case was closed. V. DISCUSSION: (A) End of Month Report— September 2010 (Copies of two reports were distributed to the Board.) Kenneth Kovensky, Operations Manager, Growth Management Division: • The report entitled, "Contractors' Licensing Revenues: Budget vs. Actual," outlined a summary of revenues versus budgeted amounts by object codes for FY -08 through FY -10 and includes a column for budgeted amounts for FY -11. • Actual revenues for Contractors' Licensing - $904,256. • Budgeted amount - $690,000 • Increase was due to increases effective January 1, 2010 • FY 11 Budget - $909,000 (Revenues will be less due to loss of State Renewal fees) The report entitled, "Cost of Service: FY -11," outlined the cost of doing business for the Contractors' Licensing department. IX. REPORTS: None X. NEXT MEETING DATE: Wednesday, November l7, 2010 Board of County Commissioners' Chambers, Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor (Courthouse Complex), 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of the Vice Chair at 11:51 AM. COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTOR LICENSING BOARD These Minutes were approved by the Board/Chairman on 1V)V i8 2010, as presented [k], or as amended [_]. 17 RECEIVED FEB 16 2011 Fiala Hiller Henning �jvl 6 Coyle —_i�- Coletta sr' 1A4 14 January 19, 2011 +,am of county Coro*slwem MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTORS' LICENSING BOARD Naples, Florida, January 19, *6 � -D I i LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Contractors' Licensing Board, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Administrative Building "F," 3rd floor, Collier County Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Kyle Lantz Vice Chair: Lee Horn Michael Boyd Terry Jerulle - Excused Richard Joslin Thomas Lykos Robert Meister - Excused Jon Walker Patrick White ALSO PRESENT: Patrick Neale, Esq., Attorney for the Board Robert Zachary, Esq., Assistant County Attorney Michael Ossorio, Contractors' Licensing Supervisor Ian Jackson, Licensing Compliance Officer Karen Clements, Licensing Compliance Officer ,✓ 16 11 A4 4 January 19, 2011 Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes that testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. I. ROLL CALL: Chairman Lantz called the meeting to order at 9:03 AM and read the procedures to be followed to appeal a decision. Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. II. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS: Changes: • Item VI, under "New Business " — (C), Richard A. Hearn: Review of Certification of Construction Experience was deleted because Board approval was not required to obtain the Certificate. • Item VII, under "Old Business " — (B), Case 92011-02: Joshua Allen Norris was withdrawn. Thomas Lykos moved to approve the above- referenced changes to the Agenda. Second by Patrick White. Carried unanimously, 7— 0. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Thomas Lykos moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by Richard Joslin. Carried unanimously, 7 — 0. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — November 17,2010: Vice Chairman Lee Horn moved to approve the Minutes of the November 17, 2010 meeting as submitted. Second by Jon Walker. Carried unanimously, 7— 0. V. DISCUSSION: None VI. NEW BUSINESS: (Note: In each of the cases heard under Sections VI and VII, as follows, the individuals to testify were sworn in.) (A) James C. McLaughlin — Contesting Citation(s) The Respondent was not present for the Hearing. Richard Joslin moved to uphold the Citations. Second by Thomas Lykos. The Motion carried, 6— "Yes " /I- "No., " Patrick White was opposed. 161 Aanu4� 19, 2011 Mr. White stated the Respondent was entitled to appear before the Board to present his case in the future. Richard Joslin asked if the Board had the authority to increase the amount of the fine since it was not a first offense. Attorney Neale stated, under Florida Statutes, Chapter 489, Section 127: "If the Enforcement or Licensing Board or designated Special Magistrate finds that a violation exists, the Enforcement /Licensing Board may order the violator to pay a civil penalty of not less than the amount set forth on the Citation but not more than $1, 000 per day for each violation. " "In determining the amount of the penalty, the Enforcement /Licensing Board or designated Special Magistrate shall consider the following factors: 1. The gravity of the violation. 2. Any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation. 3. Any previous violations committed by the violator." Michael Ossorio clarified that Citations #5835 and #5836 were both issued as first offenses Mr. Joslin stated it appeared the Respondent accepted the contract with the knowledge that he was not licensed. He suggested increasing the penalty to $500.00, rather than $300, for each violation. Patrick White stated that since the Respondent was not present, it was not possible to determine if any actions had been taken to correct the situation. The Board was missing key evidence, i.e., the Respondent's testimony. Ian Jackson confirmed the Hearing was initiated by the Respondent who was advised of the date and time. Thomas Lykos stated there was some confusion as to who actually pulled the permit. By consensus, the Board agreed to impose only the fines noted in the Citations. (B) Alexander Helmut Semnf — Contesting Citation(s) The Respondent was not present. Patrick White moved to uphold the Citation #5871. Second by Richard Joslin. Carried unanimously, 7- 0. There was a discussion concerning the Board's position in general regarding Respondents who request a Hearing but do not appear. It was suggested the Board should make a "clear cut choice" by imposing higher fine amounts to those individuals who request Hearings but fail to attend. Mr. Ossorio pointed out a Hearing is not required and an individual who is 16 l 1 A4 January 19, 2011 issued a Citation may choose to pay the fine. If a Respondent does not appear at a Hearing and the Citation is upheld by the Board, a 15 -day letter is issued to notify the Respondent that he is required pay the fine. Attorney Neale stated it would be difficult to support a decision by the Board to impose enhanced penalties when a Respondent did not present his case simply to make an example. He further stated an individual should not be punished for exercising his right to contest a Citation. (C) (Deleted per amendment to the Agenda) (D) Marcio J. Gequelin —Contesting Citation(s): Citation: #5892 Date: December 6, 2010 Fine: $300.00 Description of Violation: Engage in the business or act in the capacity of a Contractor, or advertise self or business organization as available to engage in the business, or act in the capacity of a contractor without being duly registered or certified Mr. Gequelin presented his case: • He was licensed in 2003 as a Tile and Marble Contractor, but he did not renew the license in 2005. His business was closed in 2009. • His new business is Style Tile & Marble, Inc. • He was not aware Bonita Springs was part of Collier County — he thought it was in Lee County. • He responded within 24 hours of receiving the Citation and presented the required documents to the Contractor Licensing Department. • He is currently licensed in Lee County and Charlotte County. Ian Jackson presented the following information: • He was patrolling the Barefoot Beach area. • The Respondent was working as a subcontractor for a General Contractor for the installation of tile and marble. • A "Stop Work" Order was issued along with the Citation. • The Respondent has obtained a Collier County license and a copy of his license was presented to the Board. Chairman Lantz commended the Respondent for obtaining his license so quickly. Attorney Neale noted the Board had the option to dismiss the Citation and cited Florida Statutes, Chapter 489, Section 127, entitled "Prohibitions; penalties:" `7f the person issued the Citation, or his /her designated representative, shows that the Citation is invalid or the violation has been corrected 16 A 4anuary 19, 2011 prior to appearing before the Enforcement or Licensing Board, the Enforcement or Licensing Board may dismiss the Citation unless the violation is irreparable or irreversible. " Patrick White moved to approve dismissing the Citation. Second by Thomas Lykos. It was determined there were no issues with the quality of the Respondent's work product. Ian Jackson pointed out any issues would be the responsibility of the General Contractor to correct. Motion carried unanimously, 7— 0. (E) Bruce L. Thomas — Contesting Citation(s) Citation: #5917 Date: December 6, 2010 Fine: $300.00 Description of Violation: Engage in the business or act in the capacity of a Contractor, or advertise self or business organization as available to engage in the business, or act in the capacity of a contractor without being duly registered or certified. Mr. Thomas presented his case: • He is licensed for landscaping in Lee County. • He received a call from a couple in Collier County to do some landscaping work. • He gave them an estimate which they accepted. • Ile was unaware of the need for a Collier County license because it was the first time he worked in Collier County. • He did not perform any work. Karen Clements presented the following information: • The Respondent was provided a copy of the Collier County Ordinance and she explained the requirements for testing. • Lee County requires only an occupational license to work. The Respondent's license was inactive in Lee County at the time the Citation was issued. Mr. Thomas stated he would provide proof of his Workers' Compensation insurance through The Hartford Insurance. He explained he is currently working as a "d/b /a. He stated his previous corporation, "Covenant Landscaping of America, Inc." was dissolved in 2009 due to the expense of corporate filing fees. His truck currently advertises "Covenant Landscaping of America" without the "Inc." 161 lA Janua#19, 2011 Bruce Thomas stated he intends to become licensed in Collier County but was unsure how to start. He requested the fine be waived in order to use the funds to pay the licensing exam fee. He stated he needs direction from the Board. Chairman Lantz observed the Respondent had time to make inquiries and to begin the process. He was concerned that no efforts were made prior to the Hearing. Patrick White suggested the Board consider tabling further discussion until next month in order to give the Respondent an opportunity to apply. Karen Clements clarified there was no landscaping license in Lee County — only an occupational license. Collier County requires an applicant to pass tests before a license will be issued. Lee County does not observe the same process. Michael Ossorio confirmed that two tests are required — a "Business Procedures" exam and a "Tree" exam which Mr. Thomas could take in Gainesville within a week. The tests are also given in Bonita Springs but only once a month. He was not certain of the cut -off date to apply for the exams. He suggested the faster venue would be to go to Gainesville. Mr. Thomas indicated his preference was to take the tests in Bonita Springs, Thomas Lykos noted the Ordinance states if the violation was remedied prior to the Hearing, the Board may dismiss the Citation. He did not support the suggestion to table the issue until next month. He stated the Respondent requested the Hearing and did not abate prior to the Hearing. Thomas Lykos moved to approve upholding the terms of the Citation. Second by Richard Joslin. Mr. White suggested the Board should work with someone who was willing to try and noted the customer was not harmed. He stated it was difficult to pay the $300 fine in addition to the fees for the tests due to the economy. Chairman Lantz offered an option to approve waiving the fee for sixty days but if the Respondent did not obtain his license within that time, the fines would be imposed. He stated there were no Health/Safety /Welfare issues involved. Attorney Neale stated if the vote to uphold the Citation fails, the Citation is no longer valid. Mr. Lykos pointed out there have been six weeks from the date the Citation was issued to the date of Hearing and the Respondent did nothing during that entire time to abate the violation. He stated it was his feeling the only reason the Respondent was attempting to obtain a license in Collier County was because he was caught. The Respondent reiterated his claim that he did not intend to break the law. Mr. Joslin stated Mr. Thomas did not pay attention — he did not find out about Collier County's regulations — he could have investigated but he did nothing. The Respondent stated he thought lie was licensed by Lee County and requested a second chance. Karen Clements stated she explained the requirements to Mr. Thomas and he was offered the option of a payment plan. 16 I 1 A4 A January 19, 2011 The Motion carried, 4— "Yes " 13 — "No." Mr. Lantz, Mr. White, and Mr. Boyd were opposed. (F) Marlene Santonastaso — Waiver of Testing for Drywall Certificate Ms. Santonastaso requested Mark Tate appear as a witness and he was also sworn in. Mr. Tate is the President of Naples Drywall and Plastering, Inc. She is the Secretary and Registered Agent for the Corporation. Mark Tate provided background information: • The Corporation was formed in 1994 and has completed approximately $20M worth of work in the past 17 years • Provided metal framing, drywall, and stucco work • The company's reputation has been impeccable. • He expressed confusion as to how the situation happened since he was under the impression that he was licensed. • He requested an opportunity to obtain the proper licenses. Vice Chairman Horn stated the focus of the Hearing was Mr. Santonastaso's qualifications. The Respondent stated she was under the impression she had been licensed for stucco and plastering since 1994. Thomas Lykos stated the request was to waive the requirement for testing to obtain a Drywall Certificate. Attorney Neale stated there are two separate licenses. The Plastering /Stucco Contractor license requires an applicant to have 36 months experience and obtain a passing grade on the approved tests in order to be issued. He stated Ms. Santonastaso has a Plastering /Stucco Contractor license. He noted the Drywall Contractor license also requires 36 months experience and a passing grade on the approve tests. Michael Ossorio stated there have always been two separate licensing exams. Marlene Santonastaso took the drywall exam in 2000 but her score was only 48. Chairman Lantz noted it appeared as if the wrong license had been obtained in the first place and it took 17 years before they were caught. Mr. Tate reiterated they were not hiding. Chairman Lantz stated classes were available to prepare for the test. Mr. Tate requested a 60 -day probationary period in order to prepare for and take the test. It was noted that, at the November meeting, the Board voted to table review of the application until the January 19, 2011 meeting. Marlene Santonastaso stated she obtained the information packet from the Contractor Licensing Department but waited until the Board made its decision before doing anything. Mr. Ossorio stated the County had no position on the issue when he met with Ms. Santonastaso. She had already taken and passed the Business Procedures test. 16 11 Aa19,20 I Richard Joslin moved to deny the application to waive testing for the Drywall Certificate. Second by Jon Walker. Patrick White suggested granting 30 days to obtain the license. Attorney Neale suggested the Board deny the Waiver but approve a 30 -day probationary license during which time the test could be taken. If the test was not taken and passed, the license would become invalid. Michael Ossorio stated if the Motion is passed, the applicant will be required to pay $205 to obtain the probationary drywall license which will expire within 30 days. The Plastering /Stucco license will be retained. Richard Joslin amended his Motion to deny waiving the testing requirements and to approve granting a 30 -day probationary drywall license during which time the applicant is to take and pass the required exams. If the exams are not taken and passed within the 30 -day period, the denial of the Waiver will continue and the license will become void Second by Jon Walker. Michael Ossorio confirmed if Ms. Santonastaso takes and passes the exams, the Certificate will be valid until September. The Motion carried, 6 — "Yes "I] — "No. " Chairman Lantz was opposed BREAK: 10:09 AM RESUMED: 10:23 AM VII. OLD BUSINESS: A. Orders of the Board (Signing by Chairman) Attorney Neale advised the Board that the Agenda was to be re- opened and amended in order to include an item to permit Signing of the Orders of the Board. A Motion was made with a supporting second to amend the Agenda as stated by Attorney Neale. Carried unanimously, 7— 0. Richard Joslin moved to approve the signing of the Orders of the Board by the Chairman. Second by Thomas Lykos. Carried unanimously, 7 — 0. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Case #2011— 01: Todd D. Keller, d /b /a Tin Men Home Improvement Co. Ian Jackson noted Mr. Keller had been present earlier but left due to illness. He stated Mr. Keller and Collier County had entered into a Stipulated Agreement and requested to enter the information packet into evidence. 16 h.1 January 19 2011 Patrick White moved to approve accepting the evidence packet. Second by Richard Joslin. Motion carried, 7 — 0. (Note: Copies of the Stipulation were distributed copies to the Board.) Attorney Neale stated if the Supervisor testified that the document presented to the Board was the actual document signed by the Respondent, the Board could adopt the Stipulation/Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign it. Thomas Lykos asked how the Contractor, Parkerbuilt, became involved in the project. Ian Jackson stated Mr. Keller worked as an employee for The Parkerbuilt Company, LLC. There was an issue with the contract between Mr. Keller and the homeowner, and a Building Permit had been obtained by the Contractor. The homeowner cancelled the contract and the construction did not begin. Michael Ossorio talked with the homeowner who stated he cancelled the contract when he learned Parkerbuilt pulled the Permit. Since there was no direct contact between the person who pulled the Permit and the homeowner, there was no violation. The Permit was voided. No money was paid and the homeowner hired another Contractor. Mr. Lykos reminded the Board there have been other cases where one company signed a contract with a homeowner and another company pulled the Permit. He asked why "that guy" was never brought before the Board. There is an Ordinance which prohibits the "selling" of a Contractor's license. Mr. Ossorio explained when dealing with a State - certified Contractor if there is misconduct at the State level, the information is forwarded to the State for disciplinary action. Mr. Jackson noted if the Contractor who obtained the Permit was registered in Collier County, then the County would have jurisdiction to pursue the Contractor and schedule a Hearing. Parkerbuilt is State - certified but not registered in Collier County. When asked if the Contractor's Permit - pulling privileges could be withdrawn, Michael Ossorio replied only if it was determined that there had been a willful Code violation on the part of the Contractor. It was the first time the Contractor had pulled a permit in Collier County. There are many factors to be considered. He noted Mr. Keller signed the Stipulation on January 7, 2011 and agreed to the terms of the Stipulation. Ian Jackson confirmed Mr. Keller signed the document. He noted the Respondent had been present but left due to an emergency. Attorney Neale confirmed there is a Collier County Code provision which addresses the "selling" of a license (20 -2011) and cited the violation, in part, as follows "... knowingly conspiring with an unlicensed Contractor by allowing one's Certificate of Competency to be used by an unlicensed Contractor with the intent to evade the provisions of the Article. " He further stated if the Contractor falls under the authority of the Board, the charge can be made by the Board. 1611 A4 January 19, 2011 Patrick White moved to accept and approve the Stipulation as stated, based on the testimony of Ian Jackson, and to authorize the Chairman to sign it. Second by Thomas Lykos. Ian Jackson read the Stipulation into the record: "BOARD OF COUNTY Collier County, Florida, Petitioner, Case No. 2011 -01 VS. Todd D. Keller, d /b /a Tin Men Home Improvement, Inc., Respondent(s)." COMES NOW, the undersigned, Todd D. Keller, on behalf of himself, and enters into this Stipulation and Agreement with Collier County as to the resolution of the Administrative Complaint referenced in Case Number 2011 -01, dated the 19`h day of January, 2011. In consideration of the disposition and resolution of the matters outlined in said Administrative Complaint, for which a Hearing is currently scheduled for January 19, 2011, and to promote efficiency in the Administrative Complaint process, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1) The violations noted in the referenced Administrative Complaint are accurate and I stipulate to their existence. THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties that the Respondent shall 1. Pay the Operational Costs in the amount of $500.00 incurred in the prosecution of this Case within thirty (30) days of this Hearing. 2. Pay a Civil Penalty in the amount of $2,000.00 within thirty (30) days of this Hearing. Failure to satisfy Items 1 and 2 within the set time period will result in the immediate revocation of Certificate #21748. Serve a probationary period of twelve (12) months, in which any violation of Collier County Ordinance 2006 -46 would result in the immediate suspension of Certificate 421748 and a Hearing of the violation will be heard at the next scheduled Contractor Licensing Board meeting. 10 16l 1 A4 January 19, 2011 5. Report all jobs to Staff during the probationary period." /s/ Todd D. Keller - 1/17/11 /s/ Ian Jackson —1/17/11 Respondent Date Supervisor or Designee — Date Board Chair - Date Chairman Lantz called for a vote. The Motion carried, 7— 0. Thomas Lykos moved to approve closing the Case. Second by Richard Joslin. Carried unanimously, 7— 0. IX. REPORTS: None X. NEXT MEETING DATE: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Board of County Commissioners' Chambers, Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor (Courthouse Complex), 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of the Vice Chair at 10:45 AM. COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTOR LICENSING BOARD 7;7- Kyle Lantz, Chairm The Minutes were approved by the Board/Chairman on 2011, as presented [ 1, or as amended [ ]. 11 1 O R F w. T A FS I. Call to Order II. Attendance 16 -- PFCOVEt) - Henning OR 0 6 2010 Coyle ✓ Coletta l2tb- �t ?!i'l1 1r1) t')id Ill. Approval of Agenda ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 September 8, 2010 Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes — August 25, 2010 V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report — Gloria Herrera B. Gordon River Extension Maintenance C. Project Manager Report — Darryl Richard, Chris Tillman / Malcolm Pirnie VI. Landscape Architect Report A. Cul -de -Sac Project B. Sidewalk /Lighting /Street Tree Project VII. Old Business VIII. New Business IX. Public Comments X. Adjournment Next ineeting is October 13. 2010 at 10:00 a Growth Management Division - Construction & Maintenance :885 Horseshnr� Drive Somh Naples, =1., 34104 Misc, Comes: Data: I 1 Item #: 1, 1a j 1611 A5 4 September 7, 2010 Mr. Darryl Richard, Project Manager Collier County Alternative Transportation Modes Department 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Forest Lakes Sidewalk, PO 4500113538 Change Order Request 1 Darryl Pursuant to the staff request in our 90% plan review meeting last week, attached please find a scope increase proposal from James Abney and Associates to complete the following additional irrigation design services for the Forest Lakes Sidewalk project: 1- Additional onsite research to review existing coverage on secondary ROW, to determine suitable irrigation application methods & media for the renovated landscape; onsite & offsite review of potential effluent POC for west entry medians and other areas, as well as potential internal POC location. Research Fee, $250.00 (Two Hundred Fifty Dollars). 2- Provide additional irrigation design for newly added areas designated to receive additional /new irrigation coverage. Additional Design Fee: $400.00 (Four Hundred Dollars). The total fee amount for the additional scope of work added is $650.00 (Six Hundred Fifty Dollars). Please email or call me if you have any questions Sincerely, Scott D. Windham, ASLA Landscape Architect, LA 000 -1516 Windham Studio, Inc., Landscape Architecture, LC 26000365 8891 Brighton Lane, Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 Phone: (239) 390 -1936 Fax: (239) 390 -1937 Email: scott@windhamstudio.com www.windhamstudio.com Page 1 of 1 16 11 A5 4 From: JAAIDC2@aol.com Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 8:22 AM To: scott @windhamstudio.com Subject: Re: Forest Lakes Sidewalk Irrigation - RFP for Scope Increase Good morning Scott, Pursuant to our meeting and review of the additional scope of work to be done to complete the project I am proposing the following: 1- Additional onsite research to review existing coverage on secondary ROW, to determine suitable irrigation application methods & media for the renovated landscape; onsite & offsite review of potential effluent POC for west entry medians and other areas, as well as potential internal POC location. Research Fee, $250.00 (Two Hundred Fifty Dollars). 2- Provide additional irrigation design for newly added areas designated to receive additional /new irrigation coverage. Additional Design Fee: $400.00 (Four Hundred Dollars). The total fee amount for the additional scope of work added is $650.00 (Six Hundred Fifty Dollars). If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at your convenience regardless of the day and time. Take care. & have a great weekend! Regards, JAMES C. ABNEY & ASSOCIATES Irrigation Consulting, Auditing and Management t:A� rc_�, IA, CIT Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor 018448 State of Texas Licensed Irrigator 0005636 Telephone: (239) 304 -8451 Fax: (239) 304 -8452 Cellular: (239) 821 -3405 161 1 A5' STATUS REPORT To: Forest Lakes MSTU Committee cc: Darryl Richard, Collier County ATM Jim Carr, ABB Reid Fellows, TR Transportation, Inc. Chris Tilman, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. From: Scott Windham Date: September 8, 2010 RE: Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Project F -58 Sidewalk Project Status Report 4 Committee and team: The following is a brief status report for the Forest Lakes Sidewalk, Lighting and Street Tree project: 100% Landscape Construction Plans (Windham Studio and Abney and Associates): • Next Step: • WSI has met with staff and received 90% comments and are currently completing 100% plans, opinion of cost and Bid Tabular for submittal by the end of September. • WSI is submitting a change order for additional irrigation design services as directed by staff in the 90% review meeting on 8/30/10. These design items will be incorporated into the 100% plans. • WSI will then coordinate putting the project to bid together with county staff. (Estimate by October) 100% Sidewalk Construction Plans (ABB): • Next Step: • WSI is awaiting 90% review comments from county staff after which ABB will complete 100% Sidewalk Civil Engineering Plans, opinion of cost and bid tabular for final submittal by the end of September. 100% Sidewalk Lighting Construction Plans (TR Transportation): • Complete • Next Step: • WSI is awaiting 90% review comments from county staff after which TRT will complete 100% Sidewalk Lighting Plans, opinion of cost and bid tabular for final submittal. Windham Studio, Inc., Landscape Architecture, LC 26000365 8891 Brighton Lane, Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 Phone: (239) 390 -1936 Fax: (239) 390 -1937 Email: scott @windhamstudio.com www.windhamstudio.com 1611A5 Select Year. F2-009-3- l The 2oo9 Florida Statutes Title XXIII Chanter 316 View Entire ChaQt� MOTOR VEHICLES STATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL 316.189 Establishment of municipal and county speed zones. (1) MUNICIPAL SPEED.- -The maximum speed within any municipality is 30 miles per hour. With respect to residence districts, a municipality may set a maximum speed limit of 20 or 25 miles per hour on local streets and highways after an investigation determines that such a limit is reasonable. It shall not be necessary to conduct a separate investigation for each residence district. A municipality may set speed zones altering the speed limit, both as to maximum, not to exceed 60 miles per hour, and minimum, after investigation determines such a change is reasonable and in conformity to criteria promulgated by the Department of Transportation, except that no changes shall be made on state highways or connecting links or extensions thereof, which shall be changed only by the Department of Transportation. (2) SPEED ON COUNTY ROADS. --The maximum speed on any county- maintained road is: (a) In any business or residence district, 30 miles per hour in the daytime or nighttime; provided that with respect to residence districts a county may set a maximum speed limit of 25 miles per hour after an investigation determines that such a limit is reasonable; and it shall not be necessary to conduct a separate investigation in each residence district. (b) On any other part of a county road not a business or residence district, as set forth in s. 316.183 However, the board of county commissioners may set speed zones altering such speeds, both as to maximum and minimum, after investigation determines such a change is reasonable and in conformity to criteria promulgated by the Department of Transportation, except that no such speed zone shall permit a speed of more than 60 miles per hour. (3) POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS.- -All speed zones shall be posted with clearly legible signs. No change in speeds from 30 miles per hour or from those established in s. 316.183 shall take effect until the zone is posted by the authority changing the speed pursuant to this section and s. 316.187, All signs which limit or establish speed limits, maximum and minimum, shall be so placed and so painted as to be plainly visible and legible in daylight or in darkness when illuminated by headlights. (4) PENALTY. -- Violation of the speed limits established under this section must be cited as a moving violation, punishable as provided in chapter 318. u. .rr.,,..,.., 1AI CtatP fl iie /ctah,tra/indi cfm ?Ann mode= Dismlav Statute&Search_String =... 8/11/2010 E 161 l A 5 - EN�TL E�R R!SE3 September 7, 2010 Mr. Chris Tillman, P.E. Senior Consultant Malcolm Pimie, Inc. 4315 Metro Parkway Suite 520 Fort Myers, FL 33916 Re: Forest Lakes MSTU F -53 Change Order Request #1 - Rock Removal Dear Mr. Tillman: Quality Enterprises USA, Inc. respectfully request a change order in the amount of Fifty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty and 00 /100 ($54,820.00) for the removal of rock at Lakes 7E, 16E and 4 thin the period August 31, 2010. Back up for these cost have been previously submitted to your office. Please let me know if need any additional information. Sincerely, Louis J. Gaudio Vice President 209 rAT Fn court 3899 Mannli Dli, , Suk<216 Ceesapeake. VA 23328 Naples, Ft 39114 -5906 (757) 5488000 (239) 435 -7200 F. (757) 548260 Faa 09) 435 7202 LkYCKAM31 Forest Lakes MSTU Master Project List Updated September 8, 2010 "/ 1 M5 . jecl I Description Estimated Schedule Status Estimated Cost Completed Cost Differential Notes JULY 7, 2011 ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE PROJECT EXPENSES $1 740,655 REMAINING Combined old project nos. 4 1 Overlay Woodshire Lane and Forest Lakes Blvd and 16 Overlay Forest Lakes Blvd. from Tennis Courts on Woodshire to Project funded by MST la Gardenia Lane and from service entrance on Woodshire Lane to Completed $610,000 $145,000 $465,000 funds, not bond rave, plue. Pine Ridge Road (approx. 6500 I.f.) Project Completed. 1b F -41 - Restore drainage in cul -de -sacs, regrade side yards Mar - Jul 2008 Completed $1,050,000 $149,022 $900,978 Project Completed. throughout single family area 1c F- 47- Overlay cul -de -sacs and Forest Lakes Blvd. from Gardenia Feb - Jul 2008 Completed Project Completed. Lane to Main Entrance 2 F-42- Overlay Quail Forest Blvd. from Main Entrance to Jan - May 2008 Completed $731,000 $88,586 $642,414 Project Completed. southern end and restore drainage Combined old project nos 4- 3 Quail Run Swale Restoration and Lake Improvements 13 3a F- 43- Regrade Swale Nos. 7 -11 and install culverts. Total Feb 2008 - May Completed $147,000 $165,715 - $18,715 Project Completed. re rade length approximately 5,974 L.F. 2009 31b F -45 - Regrade Swale Nos. 1 -6 and install culverts. Total Apr - Aug 2009 Completed Project Completed, regrade length approximately 8,415 L.F. with 3c Final change 3c F -45- Regrade Swale Nos. 12 -17. Total regrade length Apr - Aug 2009 order $333,000 $160,374 $172,626 Project Completed. approximately 11,289 L.F. processing 3d F -38- Construct engineered partitions in Lakes 8 and 10 Feb 2008 - Oct Inna Deleted Project Completed. 4 F-47- Overlay Forest Lakes Drive and side streets from Feb 2008 - Jan Completed $495,000 $314,731 $180,269 Project Completed, Forest Lakes Blvd. to south end 2009 5 F -50 - Woodshire Lane Improvements (Phase 1) Mar 2008 - Aug Completed Project Completed. 2009 with 3c F.53`,Qglall Rita Lse`Sharpllne Restoratlon and May 2048 -Sep, ICO Approved 4 Entef��se. s awsted 6- Coli}4$1 #S*76: .$tab11(zstlon 2010 on4/13M0r4142r2'�� ' ` °- Project Uni anBt(illption ed 7 F -54 - Replace culvert crossinA Fairway No. 5 Jun - Oct 2008 Completed $145,235 $66,328 $78,907 Project Completed, 8 F -55 - Forest Lakes Blvd Improvements from Quail Forest May -Sep 2009 Completed $180,000 $68,667 $111,333 Project Completed. Blvd. to Woodshire Lane 9 �, - _ Fes& = 3o4ttf NfQtlAShlfe L ItCJ jtntitOtGatilentE + lug29A8 sap (�crjgiSJps 54 k. `; Haahs :.: 4 12 Y0 r 20, cbTfstrUCtiO n;8/1 9. 10 F- 57 - Drainage System Mapping and Adjustments Jul 2009 - Feb 2010 Final Ad ustments $50,000 $50,000 $0 Project Completed. 11 F - 58 - Sidewalks, Lighting Improvements, and Roadway Aug 2009 - May Delayed pending outcome of BVO $1,590,655 Cost estimate based on 60% Tree Ptatrtings 2010 Issue design actimate from 12 F -59 - Lighting Improvements Jan -May 2010 Combined with F- 13 F-60 - Cul de sac improvements Jun 2009 - May Delayed pending outcome of BVO $150,000 Awaiting 60% cost estimate 14 F - 61 - Drainage system mapping Jul - Dec 2009 Combined with F- 57 15 F- 62 - Maintenance Dredging of Lake 8 Jan - April 2010 Completed $100,000 $143,845 - $43,845 Completed 3/26/10 16 F -63 - Property Line Wall along Woodshire Lane Oct 2009 - May Combined with F- 2010 58 17 F -64 - Roadway Tree Plantings TBD 1 Combined with F- 58 ORIGINAL BOND ISSUE PROCEEDS $6,068,171 BOND - FUNDED PROJECT EXPENSES AS OFI $1,414,048 SEP 30. 2009 OCT ..._ 1, 2009 .._ _. $4' 209,523 COMMITMENTS AS OF $1,941,948 JULY 7, 2010 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES AS OF $392,964 JULY 7, 2011 ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE PROJECT EXPENSES $1 740,655 REMAINING AT COMPLETION (LINE 31) $133,956 O V M N -. O 0 J 0 L W N Eajej6 1 W W W A 4 W U + C W W V W N OmmMCCXMDMtVH-ImX5mvwr- 0 -1 K0ZOMmDD7070m- Gmc ,-Tic _ -1 o,cr c0 D ., D m = 2L� - (n� mcn= — m2) G� -I OMMDD < m mr —IX rrXIMWmmaiczi� > TOPMMr- -1 - MZ > HrMM Mmrvzi o � -< NWZmH0 = D « Tm � rnQ) rC) < DZZT ,- D7J � C) K { m m T °TT -" T cvmi � O = O C NT � � A 0O Oom om �n < � Knmmq - z0 0 < � (Wnxm � � CmN_l ZiO .- M mozz - ,<- ZmynmzZ0 < 0 � _Im2DT zelm > > 70 � wx -7000 M nzaivzi c Dm � m -1 � o � mZ cO (() m < OOOKKnnpmKZ ,. p -1 � D z < = 0m2 zm mm T � � ms, -ir z Z C) v z smzG zOZ Km wcmm Z OO � DCrm 1 -1 -I C) 13 0 TzCn O D > Dim H Tm �m mD z m z � r r W � Z x,70m0 - � X O Or 7) 0 Z m m W n m O D m m O -4 T r -n -I W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WV) A A -, W AA A D V NICn NN 000 CO 0 CT V A - 0) Co W W -" CDC (O O O CO 01 W W W WOW T .n. -A N - - O (D N) Cn (0 N -A (D A V co -, 01 Q CD N 00 W C. - N) V -AJ N O Cn (D N O O O O O O N Cn O N N O Ui CA O O (3, 01(0 m N) 0000000 N O N O 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N CO 000 CO NON 0 000 0 00000 i O N NONO . , O i O 00 '. 0. OD OO 000 OO 0) 0CA O ' OOO ' 000000 O Q) O) OCAO 0 O OO 00000000 -' 0 OOO 000000 00, 3 0 0 OO W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 0 0 W (NO N A () Cn 3 N t0 CO N -. -► V .J W N 01 O in A i i N 0T < W C)) i CD i i • ' i CD i i i i i i CD X0 W W O O W C O O D O) CO to -4 O W O (D 0 N W WW WWW WW WWW WWWWWWCnrncnbgWV)WWWW WWWWWWW WWWWWW m x j CD D N N A A A A A COD n O O 01 n A -A w O) O) Cn O CA O -' N) N Co 00(4 m Cn w -4 , .... C OI N) 014 .4 N N_ N Cn CD OD V A in iv O OD C0.-. O N Cn (D W N) CAA A (71 CnN ((CO 0 O) C) N CA CTA W C N TA N O O N N OI W (D -, 0 -40W 0 OW W O CT W .n 1 W A A O O W W N Cn Cn Cn CD -L O N WO 00 O Co v m v ACT Cn OO N N-4-WO ONO -, AO OW WO -' 0) <C C) W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W D y 1 N A A A -O W AA Oo0C so W N W A --. mm - Q OO O N -, W O W .) W N-C)j -, -, o) N U7 Cn N N - O A W Cn N V A W OC W OCnA NO (n COCn � CC000ODNAOCn C?7Cn0 W NCDCTCA 00 ONOCn W O O A V CT A O A V CA (n w 0 0 - Cn Cn N O O 000 N N O N O O) N CA Cn A N OO W 01 -J A OA A W AN000 -40 W 0CD , 000 (0 NONO i , W0 - Cn -, CA ->• 00 OCncn 1 ' A O .A O) in CT - OOO -' bN) 00 000 N O)OCAO OW -l (T -IOo tl1 0 0 (O A (n 0000) N) 0 0 0N 0 -s O 000N -,0 -, 0 (D O - W (D A! C HcncncnCCCCCnMM< <7 MOOZZ Kg KKK KgKgggKKK,� m w m o=i a, 5 1 d o 0 o W c'aaa 5 < f O C 0 0 0 7' S « C C W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W * - D, w 7 D C C C C C c D D D c C c O O W W. m m o o 0 0C) 0 0 0 0C) 0 0 0 0 0 `< - D D - m f°c o- 3 3 � 0(0 (o (o (c < s on s s s v w D D D D = w w W w -1 W 3 c c o �. w W -I O O O CD (D O (D CD n 3 3 3 .o o 3 3 3 n n (o) ,coi o •co) m c 0 0- 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 (n w W m 0 X 0 o cm) m m DQ O x - R - - 0 cncn (nc DC1) CCCnn°) v D o 0. 0. 57 mmm mmm7mmmvm<5 .o 5 5 > > OO. � � D- �, W 0 n(n� x x x m 0' CDCD m o�� 3 333333333333 o_ n03 e) Omrrm _v) op C C C O (� Z 2 ° Z Z Cp m' N' N N' N' C D CD (D (D' N' (D C D , m w w o c N O W W x Q z (n C c n n on m W o o O O O c CD o 0 5 < W O +.—. 0000 w' C)* f Z � � °-' m o .o nn O ' 0 3D o rr 7 .- 0000..• .•. CIW) Q w w CD 5 D' 3 N' 3 - (O co CD co CD 3 Z _7 K w O 0 ) i 7 m (;, r (AJt CA71 CAJ7 (An CA11 01 CiA)'1 .Z7 CiAi1 (AT CAJ7 (AJt CA11 CC< (A7t CAn CAJ7 (Aj1 CAJ7 CA11 CiA11 CA11 (A)1 CiA11 (A71 CA71 CAi1 CAJ7 UAi CAJ7 CAJ7 (AIt CAJ7 CAT 01 CAn CC) CAn CAn CA71 CAn (An CAT N O CD Z Cn -I v W w w W W CD O p Cn -, O O v W 5 CT N A O O A Cn O W OD W O OD O CG W Cn -1 OD A W (D C 0 C W v C0 -, W 0j OJ W W A r 0 C W v 400) W ) NCCADO AN � CC"D O0D N -' A W WA AO W W ANCCDDN < OC°DWOCA " " AW�' C) N -' W (O O0) CMMM -, (n A O W - - v-- OD A - AM CA Cn O -, -,(D A W V -4 CO OO (A OO CA Cn W -4 W O CT Cn W -4 CT Cn A 0001 > Oi mCOrr r r0 MD (- Cn-10 -0 -u 0 -0v -0T -0 -0TT 0 CC ) C/) 5 C) ;CJrT1 -OKT > Kv 0W00 0 m .•. F0 m A 77770 „. < 00 a ' '-• 3 m w m v � c ' , °' ag55 Q fl nD_ OOOOOOOOOOOOO mm " 5 '• 7 w n i � � i C c C c N < < < < < < N a0 . n v H OD C' ( cr 3 C v W m m O 0 > a N D OS° 3 xmoc d D.,,.� m < T 0 d K O OO Z Z Z Z o O W < W wwwwwww ww www wQ W W w C T O m cD (o 0 O -n W 0 0 d < C W O < 0307 , , , , . • , • • • = Sill -- D o D < K `< •< 7•' W D" D' S o- S= S S = = S S S w n WD D D W D N o O O W 3 ( ` • nS r O W ) 0 0 w o CD O W W K 5 < Wj 7 pa -' D D n O 0 3 � m mmm mmm m m m m m m W N CW WA f ? (p ,-• • n oC < 3 o ° C a 9. 9.Q0 O o(D < mm � _ m� � o ° no N ? ZZ ? ? ? ? 22 ? ? ? ? 0y C .=. 10 > o 7112w n WW y 3 y0 O CD n aV m3 O D 0 0 O D N a mm mS � d �v. w. W Q E y 3 C0) fl) C ' Z O O N v d ?1 2 Ut D N O V W W 0 0 ' C D ) m �< `< `< 500 D D . n C W w O o D•0 0 .. P CD v T1 T N W D O CD CD O (D y in 00 = 2 O O 1 MX 71 KK K 0 D 0 D D o D 0 c, T O D r ° W O 0 -' -' 00 - < -{ { 0 00000 - 000 0 0 OOW ° W .J OOmCA -I -1 0 CnC Cf CnCnCncn0 CncnCn 0O Co ZZniw w wi ZZZ wy � � w wwwwww rnwuw Zn n Z D D D OD ZZ Z ZZZO o 0CncnC) �1v v — U � O -400C) DDA DD �(D � o1A CAAAvl _ ;) D DjwwD 05, » wN ' O CD v N) NAA A 4, V v (n Cn Cn (n Cn Cn v Cn Cn Cn Cn v w D � CO CO A A CT -, ,-, V J I V V �I v v v O -> D D CO Cn W CT ii t W O O woo co O + OD m CD w . Z O O 0 P N A W W W W W WV) W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W T W .( W _ -4 0, N) N) 01 N N) W 0) Cr W O nAi O O) N N A 0 A Cn O N A -, A j O) .'Co O O W W A A O) -i Cn O A 0-4-14.1.) N 0) CA Cn CT 5 > O) NON O Ci) NO -I O (DO N 0 0 CO Cn 0 W W A ON -, C00 W 7 3 A w ACA 0 CA W O C - v CA W 0 i i (0 f7 .•. (D A Cn A O �I N Cn W -+ Cn (0 W O O 00 cow O O Cif O O O p1 S A N co CT CT O A -' N O Co 0 0 0000 0 0 000 0 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W D C) W -' N C) W N A j N N W CD C N N CO T W W N N N O Cn A N � O Co J O O O v A CO CO U1 N A O W N N CO CA N W VCOAOD -, N IT Co W -I N Is OD CCn in OO CAOAJA W (O -AW J MA -4-N-00-4,-CO-CON CONC -' (C W ANC) -, NA NA ON v NA CnA -J A0 000 O � ODO O nAD(0 C) n O ANAO 4 -,(DMO OM CO Cn W (D CON W 00 (D A W O CA -J v W Cn O O O O O CD Cn O Cn N -, Cn O Cn -4 0 O 0 Cn W CA W Cif 0 -400 O W (NOO� � T W 0 -' 00 0 ) N W Cn N W N V 0 000 0000000000N0 00000 -, 0) 00 N CD CO 0000 CD FOREST LA K FS I. Call to Order 11. Attendance RECEIVED th1hrf Henning DEC 0 0 2010 Coyle come i;oa:a �,. �;;r�r =m rc�r•a,�ss�ones. 111. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes A. August 25, 2010 B. September 8, 2010 ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 October 13, 2010 Agenda V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report — Gloria Herrera B. Gordon River Extension Maintenance C. Project Manager Report — Darryl Richard, Chris Tillman / Malcolm Pirnie VI. Landscape Architect Report A. Cul -de -Sac Project B. Sidewalk /Lighting /Street Tree Project VII. Old Business VIII. New Business IX. Public Comments X. Adjournment Next meeting is November 10, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Growth Management Division -- Construction & Maiotenance 2885 Fiorseshoa:' give South Naples € i._ 34,10-i Misc. Comes: DaOe: 1 Item t: Fiala rhj� Henning_; Coyle Coletta FOREST II. III IV 1.a:X K.F;.7 Call to Order Attendance Approval of Agenda 161,1 A �C'E! JED DEC 0 6 2010 ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 November 10, 2010 Agenda Approval of Minutes — October 13, 2010 -'inry Cnmeniss�oners V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report — Gloria Herrera B. Gordon River Extension Maintenance C. Project Manager Report — Darryl Richard, Chris Tillman / Malcolm Pirnie VI. Landscape Architect Report A. Cul -de -Sac Project B. Sidewalk /Lighting /Street Tree Project VII. Old Business VIII. New Business A. Election of Officers IX. Public Comments X Adjournment Next ;meeting is Dei,erober 8, 2010 at 10A)0 a.a ; Growth Management Division -- Construction & Maintenance 885 Ho rseshoe Drive South Nopies. F=i.. 34101 Misc. Corres: Date: Item #: RECEIVED OEC 13 2010 FORFST I AKF is I. Call to Order II. Attendance Ill. Approval of Agenda W) kl)Ni x'11, Fiala �- May — Henning—f+7--- yyoletta ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 December 8, 2010 Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes — November 10, 2010 V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report — Gloria Herrera B. Gordon River Extension Maintenance C. Project Manager Report — Darryl Richard, Chris Tillman / Malcolm Pirnie VI. Landscape Architect Report A. Cul-de-Sac Project B. Sidewalk/Lighting/Street Tree Project VII. Old Business Vill. New Business IX. Public Comments X. Adjournment Next iiii��etlnq is Januaf% I'L 20'0 at ?G Uo Growth Mani9ement Cjivision Constfuction �885 hoesesho��-., Drvvc S(tmiq Napfc-,-- i.. 3410-, Mim Corm: Dab: Wn 8: FOREST L.,1KFS I. Call to order 161 1 Ab- +tr? %Iliy ,1 vND DR vIN I' I�. ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 August 25, 2010 Minutes Meeting was called to order at 10:02 p.m. by George Fogg. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Robert Jones (Excused), George Fogg, Harold Bergdoll, William Seabury, Dick Barry (Excused) County: Darryl Richard — Project Manager, Pam Lulich— Manager Landscape Operations, Michelle Arnold- Director ATM, Gloria Herrera — Budget Analyst Other: Chris Tilman — Malcolm Pirnie, Scott Windham - Windham Studio, Jim Carr - Public, Donna Stephenson - Public, Michelle Drum - Public, Darlene Lafferty— Juristaff III. Approval of Agenda Add: Vlll. C. Lake Maintenance Harold Bergdoll moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes — July 7, 2010 Change: Pg54, Vl. A., paragraph 5, should read: The Committee questioned why the MSTU should be responsible for 100% of the problem that was 90% created by the Industrial area Development" William Seabury moved to approve minutes of July 7, 2010 as amended. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 40. V. Transportation Services A. Budget Report- Gloria Herrera reviewed the following: (See attached) o Available Operating Expense $5,334.33 George Fogg questioned if the approved Transfer of Funds took place ($20,000.00 from Capital Outlay to Operating Expense.) 16 11 5 Darryl Richard responded affirmatively noting Maintenance activity on� various items: • De- silting pipes • Exotic vegetation removal (at the Twin culverts) • Maintenance on Aerator Fountains Discussion took place on current Maintenance demands and the need for additional monies (Operating Expense.) It was concluded the Transfer of Funds will take place in the new Fiscal Year (2011.) B. Gordon River Extension Maintenance Darryl Richard restated the FY11 Storm Water Budget does not include a Funding commitment for the Gordon River Project (on Public Record.) Discussion ensued on the Gordon River Project and the following was concluded: • Consulting Fee - $100,000.00 • Total Cost Estimate - $850,000.00 • Opportunity for a Cost reduction due to utilizing Fill • Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage MSTU is permitted to contribute monies for the Gordon River Project as it is a benefit to the Forest Lakes MSTU • Substantial amount of water from the Industrial and Drainage areas produce the backup problem • To date no structural damage has occurred in the lowest areas of the Forest Lakes MSTU In relation to Single Family Residence flooding Chris Tilman expressed concern if a repeat storm occurred during high water conditions. He noted the following based on current conditions: • The double barrel Culvert outfall is submerged • Currently the Gordon River Water level is 6 - 6'Y2 - No (drainage) flow is going out of Forest Lakes - All Swales and Lakes are at full capacity - Forest Lakes is in total storage mode - All incoming water is in staging up • Single Family Home flooding is possible along the West side (in the event of a 25 year storm) George Fogg concurred that the Gordon River Project is needed and stated the following: • Due to current economic conditions County Funds are not available • The Gordon River Extension Project is a County Project • Requested Staff draft a letter to the BCC to request Dredging of the Gordon River Extension when County Funds are available 1611 A5 4 George Fogg moved for Staff to prepare a letter to the BCC, for Committee signatures (Forest Lakes MSTU) stating there is a problem (affecting the Forest Lakes Community) and to request the County correct the problem as soon as (County) Funding is available. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. C. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard I Chris Tilman - Malcolm Pirnie - The Forest Lakes Master Project List was reviewed. (See attached) o (3) Lakes are completed - (7) East - (7) West - (8) West o Lake (7) East - 14 ft. of yard space was restored o Lake (8) West - Erosion is continuing in one section (off cart path) - The erosion problem will be addressed by the Contractor until the roots are established - Regrade and re -sod will be performed Chris Tilman will confirm the status on the re -grade and re -sod with Thomas Roadman. Lake (16) -Work in progress - Discovered the Lake edge eroded within 3 ft of the foundation slab - Corrected (2) roof drains routed under the foundation slab which contributed to the erosion problem Lake (7) West - Conventional stabilization was utilized - Water level stages higher as it is located upstream - Varied the rock line elevation to eliminate continual sloughing Proiect (F -56) South Woodshire Ditch Improvements • Contractor mobilized on August 1 gt • Some structures and piping were set • Initial phases are complete Darryl Richard stated the Bond Issue monies remaining at the completion of Master Project List were estimated at $133,000.00. Chris Tilman noted the $133,000.00 estimate did not include $450,800.00 Contingency monies. 161 1 A 5 Malcolm Pimie Change Order No. 2 Proiect (F -53) (See attached) • The (53) working days included in the Original Contract expired August 17th • Additional (7) weeks to oversee construction is needed • Change Order total $41,860.00 (for continued CEI Services) William Seabury moved to approve $42,000.00 (Change Order) for the Lake Stabilization Project by Malcolm Pirnie. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. Darryl Richard reviewed the tally on rock removal $50,345.00 by Quality Enterprises. (See attached) D. Community Speed Limit Darryl Richard conveyed the following: • Committee direction on the preferred speed limit within Forest Lakes Community is needed • A study can be conducted (by the County Engineer) at no cost to the MSTU if the preferred speed limit is 25 mph and above After discussion the Committee agreed on the following speed limits: 0 30 MPH throughout the Community o Excluding areas with safety considerations - 25 MPH will be applicable Harold Bergdoll moved to approve to establish the speed limit at 30 MPH except where road conditions dictate 25 MPH. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. VI. Landscape Architect Report A. Cul- de-Sac Project - Under Vl. B. B. Sidewalk/Lighting /Street Tree Project Scott Windham gave the following information: (See attached) • Presently at 90% Plans • Plans are under review with Staff - Pending comments • Preliminary details are complete for the Directory Sign • Lighting Plans are 90% complete • Included in Plans - Site Furnishings - Paver pad arrangement - Bench - Trash receptacle 90% Probable Cost (See attached) • Directory sign is not included • Total $1,581,000.00 included a variety of contingencies 161 1A5 Cul -de -Sac Project (See attached) • Plans include individual Designs for all (22) Cul -de -sacs - Cart storage arrangement will be reviewed with each Cul- de -Sac Home Owner • No cost increase involved for Individual Plans Discussion ensued on Bench area locations: o (5) Bench areas are planned o Pavers will be installed on a compacted base Harold Bergdoll left 11:42 a.m. George Fogg noted Picnic areas must be ADA Compliant. Scott Windham stated the Green Screen Wall was reduced to 700 ft. Harold Bergdoll returned 11:48 a.m. Darryl Richard stated a CD will be provided to the Committee when the Plans are 100 %. VII. Old Business IX. New Business A. Floating Islands Staff emailed Product information on Floating Mats to the Committee. Michelle Arnold suggested a City representative (Mike Bower) attend a future meeting to review the benefits of the Floating Mats with the Committee. George Fogg responded the Lakes are the Golf Course responsibility. If the Forest Lakes MSTU would become involved in maintaining the Lakes the Floating Mats would be considered at that time. B. New Project Proposal (F -64 Project) Darryl Richard reviewed Proposed Forest Lakes Blvd. South Culvert Project and Estimate: (See attached) • A Minor drainage issue exists at newly constructed home • Estimate $80,000.00 • Suggested installing the Culvert prior to the Sidewalk installation (if the Committee elected to take on the Project) • Project is not essential The Committee was in agreement that the Homeowner is responsible to correct the problem. C. Lake Maintenance Harold Bergdoll conveyed complaints on condition of Lakes by Residents of Turtle Lakes and Emerald Greens. He reviewed 161 lA� Aquagenix Maintenance agreement $448.90 per month (with the 4 Course.) He noted additional treatments are needed. After much discussion George Fogg volunteered to obtain a quote from an alternate Contractor as he questioned Aquagenix level of Service. X. Public Comments Discussion developed on the preferred date to hold the Public Meeting. It was agreed by the Committee to meet in October with the Condominium Manager or Board of Directors prior to scheduling a Public meeting. There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned by the Vice Chairman at 12:26 P.M. Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage MSTU Advisory Committee These minutes approved by the Committee on 1 C - (3 ICS as presented 1 or amended Next meeting is September 7, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Growth Management Division — Construction & Maintenance 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 16 I 1 A5 LAKES ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 September 8, 2010 Minutes I. Call to order Meeting was called to order at 10:01 p.m. by George Fogg. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Robert Jones (Excused), George Fogg, Harold Bergdoll (Excused), William Seabury, Dick Barry County: Darryl Richard — Project Manager, Pam Lulich— Manager Landscape Operations, Gloria Herrera — Budget Analyst Other: Chris Tilman — Malcolm Pirnie, Scott Windham - Windham Studio, Joanne Varner - Public, Darlene Lafferty — Juristaff III. Approval of Agenda William Seabury moved to approve the Agenda as submitted. Second by Dick Barry. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes — August 25, 2010 The Committee requested to postpone approval of the minutes until the October 13, 2010 meeting. V. Transportation Services A. Budget Report- Gloria Herrera reviewed the following: (See attached) • Total Revenue received $246,863.09 • Sufficient monies are available in Operating Expense $3,974.66 for the remainder of FY10 • Available Capital Outlay $1,863,544.40 Discussion ensued concerning the quantity of Closed P.O.s on the Budget Report. It was suggested to combine all Closed P.O.s as one Line Item on subsequent Budget Reports. Gloria Herrera noted all P.O.s are retained for one year by the Budget Office and are available to Staff or Committee upon request. lb 1 1 q5 After discussion it was concluded the number of P.O.s will decrease in the new Fiscal Year therefore the Budget Report format will remain as presented. B. Gordon River Extension Maintenance Darryl Richard reported Staff is preparing the Letter to the BCC as directed by the Committee (concerning County Funds and Dredging of the Gordon River Extension.) Additionally the Draft will be distributed to the Committee for review and comments. George Fogg requested the Letter be presented expeditiously to the BCC for FY12 Budget consideration. Discussion took place on employing Prescriptive Easements for the Gordon River Maintenance Project. Dick Barry supported executing a Prescriptive Easement in lieu of spending MSTU monies to acquire necessary Easements for the Gordon River Maintenance Project. Chris Tilman perceived Legal requirements for Prescriptive Easements may have been met as the Gordon River is a major drainage path for a large portion of the County. George Fogg noted the Gordon River Maintenance Project was removed from Forest Lakes MSTU potential Project Scope. Additionally he agreed that pursuing Prescriptive Easements is noteworthy. Chris Tilman conveyed the following • A Prescriptive Easement only grants access directly over the waterway - Additional Maintenance costs will be incurred due to restricted access • Perceived negotiating with Property Owners was a better course of action The Committee requested to include notations in the Draft Letter to the BCC on the preliminary work that was performed by the MSTU for the Project: • An Exemption was issued from Permitting (SFWMD) • A General Permit was issued by the Corp of Engineers - Corp of Engineers Permit is valid for (2) years • Surveys were conducted C. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard / Chris Tilman - Malcolm Pirnie - The Forest Lakes Master Project List was reviewed. (See attached) Proiect (F -53) Quail Run Lake Shoreline Restoration and Stabilization o Construction is underway 1611 1 A5 o Change Order was submitted by Quality Enterprises for Rock Removal ($54,820.00) George Fogg moved to approve up to $60,000.00 for removal of rocks in various Lakes under Project F -53. Second by William Seabury. George Fogg requested confirmation on the discovery of a layer of base rock located beneath the cap rock tier (by the Contractor.) Chris Tilman responded affirmatively noting: • The base rock was not detected during Geotechnical Boring • The second layer consists of hard dense rock similar to concrete and is 4 -5 ft. thick • Base rock layer presents a problem for Vinyl Sheet Pile installation • Cost effective solutions are being researched (on the base rock layer) Motion carried unanimously 3-0. Proiect (F -56) South Woodshire Ditch Improvements Chris Tilman reported the following information: • Substantial Ditch erosion is occurring - Additional fill material is needed • Falling Perimeter Fence is a nuisance to the Contractor - Fence removal and replacement is beyond the Contractors Scope of Services - Exotic growth is pushing on the Fence - Fence is located on the Naples Bath and Tennis property - The trees are undercutting the Fence due to erosion • A Quote from Haskins to remove the Fence and replace with suitable Fence material will be requested George Fogg moved to direct Staff and Consultant (Malcolm Pirnie) to proceed with resolving the fence issue, the removal of Plant Material behind fence, and installation of Root Barriers for the walkway and Drainage System along Woodshire Lane. Additionally to encumber cost necessary to accomplish the Project. Second by William Seabury. Chris Tilman reported the following information on proposed Sidewalk installation by Haskins: • Exceptional Unit price was proposed on Sidewalk installation • Unit price will be confirmed prior to modifying the Change Order to include - Sidewalk will extend up to the Publix turn in • Noted the entire length of Woodshire will be an operational pedestrian path (up to Publix) prior to the start of season 16 1,1 A 5 4 Motion was amended to add. "To include Sidewalks up to Pine Ridge Road." Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. VI. Landscape Architect Report A. Cul- de-Sac Project Scott Windham gave the following information: 0 90% plans were submitted o Staff is preparing Information Packets for delivery to Cul de sac Residents Darryl Richard stated the Packets will be distributed to Property Owners via: • Certified Mail • Cover Letter and Plans will be attached to Resident Door(s) B. Sidewalk/Lighting /Street Tree Project Scott Windham reported: (See attached) • Irrigation Scope was expanded to encompass all of Woodshire Lane (from Pine Ridge Road to Woodshire pool) • Schematic Irrigation Head layout is being prepared by ABB (along Condominium Properties on Forest Lakes Blvd) Darryl Richard stated meetings will be conducted with the HOA directly impacted by the Sidewalk Project. o Change Order request $650.00 was submitted for Irrigation work (Windham Studio) - Change Order did not include monies to produce Presentation Boards (Key Map) for the Public Meeting George Fogg moved to approve (monies) as needed up to $2500.00 for Additional Design Services to Scott Windham (Windham Studio) for overall Panel (Board) for Public presentations and Irrigation Schematics for Forest Lakes Blvd. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. • Additional Site Analysis is being performed for the Maintenance area on Woodshire • New Directory Sign Budget - $11,500.00 Darryl Richard requested electronic submittal of Plans from Scott Windham to prepare for the Public meeting. Discussion ensued concerning the water source for Irrigation in (2) Medians at the Main Entrance (west side.) It was stated the water supply is currently provided by the Property Owner and they have requested to disconnect the Irrigation water supply to the Medians. 4 16 tat A) George Fogg questioned the approval status to tap into Reuse Water for Irrigation on Woodshire Lane. Scott Windham will report back to the Committee on the approval status to utilize Reuse water. Pam Lulich suggested obtaining a Permit with City of Naples to tap into Reuse Water. She stated the City charges a flat fee of $1,000.00 with monies refunded. Discussion resumed on the Main Entrance Median Irrigation. It was suggested that the Club (Golf Course) supply water to the (2) Main Entrance Medians as they currently provide Irrigation at the Directory Signs. VII. Old Business - None VIII. New Business Dick Barry reported 1 ft. of pipe is exposed and noted it is a safety issue (1400 range of Naples Blvd.) Chris Tilman stated he will assess the exposed pipe. IX. Public Comments Joanne Varner requested information on the Sidewalk, Lighting, and Tree Project. Darryl Richard responded that a copy of the Design Plans will be provided to her when they are available. Additionally Staff will coordinate a meeting with Joanne Varner to review the Plans. There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned by the Vice Chairman at 11:36 P.M. Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage MSTU Advisory Committee .,�:Q'ice Ch I an ... These minutes a roved by the Committee on (0 3 - 1 c as presentedor amended Next meeting is October 13, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Growth Management Division - Construction & Maintenance 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples. FL. 34104 161 1 A5 Forest Lakes MSTU Master Project List Updated October 13, 2010 l.dt I Deac,lvton Ectimxted aG,.dule S.. E.umeted coat canpleNd CO,t aM.r.Wi N... OCT 1, 2009 COMMITMENTS AS OF $1941948 JULY 7, 2010 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES AS OF Combined old project nos. 14 1 Overlay Woodshire Lane and Forest Lakes Blvd ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE PROJECT EXPENSES $1 740,655 REMAINING ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE FUNDS REMAINING el rYMACI CTIr1Nl n IAIC'Nl and 16 Overlay Forest Lakes Blvd. from Tennis Courts on Woodshire to Project funded by MSTU la Gardenia Lane and from service entrance on Woodshire Lane to Completed $610,000 $145,000 $465,000 funds, not bond revenue. Pine Ride Road (approx. 65001 f. Project Completed. 1bF -41- Restore drainage in cul -de -sacs, regrade side yards Mar - Jul 2008 Completed $1,050,000 $149,022 $900,978 Project Completed. throughout single family area 10 F- 47- Overlay cul-de -sacs and Forest Lakes Blvd. from Gardenia Feb - Jul 2008 Completed Project Completed. Lane to Main Entrance 2 F- 42- Overlay Quail Forest Blvd. from Main Entrance to Jan - May 2008 Completed $731,000 $88,586 $642,414 Project Completed. southern end and restore drainage 3 Quail Run Swale Restoration and Lake Improvements Combined old project nos 4- 13 3a F -43- Regrade Swale Nos. 7 -11 and install culverts. Total Feb 2008 - May Completed $147,000 $165,715 - $18,715 Project Completed. re rade length approximately 5,974 L.F. 2009 3b F-45 - Regrade Swale Nos. 1.6 and install culverts. Total regred Apr - Aug 2009 Completed with Project Completed. length approximately 8,415 L.F. 3c Final change 3c F-45- Regrade Swale Nos. 12 -17. Total regrade length Apr - AUg 2009 order $333,000 $160,374 $172,626 Project Completed. approximately 11,289 L.F. processing 3d F -38- Construct engineered partitions in Lakes 8 and 10 Feb 2008 - Oct Deleted Project Completed. 4 F-47- Overlay Forest Lakes Drive and side streets from Feb 2008 - Jan Completed $495,000 $314,731 $180,269 Project Completed. Forest Lakes Blvd. to south end 2009 5 ro F -50 - Woodshire Lane Improvements (Phase 1) Mar 2008 -Aug Completed with Project Completed. 2009 3c C t 1� - I 7 F -54•Replace culvert crossing F=Irwa y 111 9 Jun - Oct 2008 Completed $145,235 $66,328 $78,907 Project Completed. 8 F -55 - Forest Lakes Blvd Improvements from Quail Forest May -Sep 2009 Completed $180,000 $68,667 $111,333 Project Completed. Blvd. to Woodshire Lane v`h 4 if5�� y e ei pa�, 10 F- 57 - Drainage System Mapping and Adjustments Jul 2009 - Feb Final $50,000 $50,000 $0 Project Completed. 2010 Ad'usknenls F .58 - Sidewalks, Lighting Improvements, and Roadway Aug 2009 - May Delayed pending $1,590,655 Cost estimate based on 60% 11 Tree Plantings 2010 outcome of BV0 design estimate from issue 12 F -59 - Lighting Improvements Jan -May 2010 Combined with F- 13 F -60 - Cut de sac Improvements Jun 2009- May Delayed pending ou me of BVO tco $150,000 Awaiting 60% cost estimate 14 F - 61 - Drainage system mapping Jul - Dec 2009 Combined with F- 57 15 F.62 - Maintenance Dredging of Lake 8 Jan -A ril 2010 Completed $100,000 $143,845 - $43,845 Completed 3/26/10 16 F -63 - Property Line Wall along Woodshire Lane Oct 2009 - May Combined with F- 2010 58 17 F -64- Roadway Tree Plantings TBD Combined! with F- ORIGINAL BOND ISSUE PROCEEDS $6,068,171 BOND - FUNDED PROJECT EXPENSES AS OF $1,414.048 SEP 30, 2009 BOND ISSUE FUNDS REMAINING AS OF $4,209,523 OCT 1, 2009 COMMITMENTS AS OF $1941948 JULY 7, 2010 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES AS OF $392,964 JULY 7, 2011 ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE PROJECT EXPENSES $1 740,655 REMAINING ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE FUNDS REMAINING el rYMACI CTIr1Nl n IAIC'Nl $133,956 h) FOREST ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE M.S.T.U. LAKES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Board of County Commissioners 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Board of County Commissioners, 161 1A5 For the past 3 years the Forest Lakes MSTU Committee has been completing stormwater improvements throughout the Community with funds acquired through the Forest Lakes Bond Issue (approximately 6.1 million dollars). The Committee is very satisfied with the results of the improvement projects within Forest Lakes MSTU as evidenced by much better internal drainage within Forest Lakes Community. Forest Lakes MSTU Committee has been informed by their Engineer Consultant that the downstream condition of the Gordon River Extension canal may potentially cause unusually high staging of the water levels due to a blockage in the canal. The Forest Lakes MSTU Committee in an effort to have this issue resolved had paid an Engineer Consultant to conduct a study of the canal conditions downstream from Forest Lakes MSTU and how this condition relates to the Forest Lakes MSTU hydrology. The Engineering report found that there was a portion of the Gordon River Extension canal that has become severely blocked and requires maintenance dredging in order to alleviate the upstream staging effect will result in possible community flooding if the silt and vegetation are not removed. Currently the Growth Management Division - Construction & Maintenance Fiscal Year 2011 Budget Plan does not have funding allocated for this project. Therefore, this letter is a request of the Forest Lakes MSTU Committee that the Board of County Commissioners consider this project 'very important'. Further, we request that the Board place it in a 'high priority status' for the FY -2012 Budget Plan and that it also be given first consideration should funding become available prior to the next Fiscal Year Budget Cycle. Sincerely, Forest Lakes MSTU Committee: Robert H. Jones, Chairman William Seabury, Committee Member Richard Barry, Committee Member George Fogg, Vice Chairman Harold Bergdoll, Committee Member (OC ) INDEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS AND CONSULTANTS October 1, 2010 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Project Manager Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 16 ' 11 M31 b1 irnie, Inc 4315 Metro Pkwy, Suite 520 Fort Myers, FL 33916 Phone (239) 332 -1300 Fax (239) 332 -1789 Re: Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F -56 —South Woodshire Ditch Improvements PO #4500108033 Change Order No. 3 Dear Mr. Richard: Malcolm Pirnie has been providing professional services for the F -56 project, and during the course of the project construction the MSTU Committee and the County staff requested additional work from the contractor to address erosion issues and to improve pedestrian safety and access in the MSTU. This additional work included the following: • Removal of approximately 3,200 linear feet of existing chain link fence and replacement with a new chain link fence. Due to extensive erosion and overgrown vegetation at the site, a significant portion of the existing fence has collapsed and is interfering with the construction work. • Removal and trimming of vegetation along and within approximately two feet of the property line to provide a clear path for the installation of the new chain link fence. • Addition of approximately 2,500 linear feet of concrete sidewalk to connect the sidewalk segment originally planned for this project with the Publix shopping center turnout on Woodshire Drive. This will provide a continuous pedestrian path along Woodshire Lane and will greatly improve the safety and access for the MSTU residents. The requested work was not part of Malcolm Pirnie's original scope, so this Change Order No. 3 requests an additional 92 days of contract time and an additional $33,950 in funding to add the construction management and oversight effort associated with the requested additional contractor scope to our existing Purchase Order. (9) 161 1 A5 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F -56 - Change Order No. 3 October 1, 2010 Page 2 of 3 SCOPE OF SERVICES This Change Order No. 3 adds the following tasks and work effort to the original project scope: TASK 050 — Project Management This task includes the work effort required for project planning, administration, and coordination. Specific activities included in this task include the following: • Managing and coordinating project activities and field personnel to control costs and maintain the project schedule. • Maintaining project files and data systems • Preparing monthly invoices • Providing internal quality control • Internal and external project - related communications TASK 300 — Construction Oversight Services Provide contractor oversight and field direction during the execution of the additional project work, up to twenty -five (25) business days. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to performing the work identified in this scope, Malcolm Pirnie will perform Additional Services as requested by the County. The need for such services may arise from the completion of the tasks identified above and cannot be fully defined at this time. However, it may be determined at some future date that these additional services are necessary to thoroughly complete or implement the Work. Examples of Additional Services may include technical evaluations, preparation of reports, or other activities deemed necessary by the County. It should be noted that the fees for these services have not been included in this scope. Such tasks and their level of effort, associated budgets and schedules will be described in detail in work authorizations to be issued at the time such tasks are requested by the County. SCHEDULE Under this Change Order No. 3, Malcolm Pirnie anticipates providing the requested additional services outlined above for a period of up to 92 days beyond the current contract due date of September 30, 2010, or until the total contract amount is invoiced. COMPENSATION Malcolm Pirnie will provide this additional scope of services under the terms and conditions of Contract 05 -3657 Agreement for Project Management and Oversight Services for a lump sum fee of $33,950. The project budget is based on the scope of work as provided and is subject to cost adjustment resulting from ( J C ) 161 1 A5 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F -56 - Change Order No. 3 October 1, 2010 Page 3 of 3 any change in the scope or schedule of work that would exceed the total lump sum fee shown above. Malcolm Pirnie appreciates this opportunity to provide this requested scope of services, and will enjoy working with the County on this important project. If you have any questions regarding this Change Order No. 3 scope or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me at (239) 332 -1300. Sincerely, MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. C4 . - Christopher C. Tilman, P.E. Senior Consultant A403748 (I') 161 1 A5 STATUS REPORT To: Forest Lakes MSTU Committee cc: Darryl Richard, Collier County ATM Jim Carr, ABB Reid Fellows, TR Transportation, Inc. Chris Tilman, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. From: Scott Windham Date: October 10, 2010 RE: Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Project F -58 Sidewalk Project and F -60 Culdesac Improvements Status Report 5 Committee and team: The following is a brief status report for the Forest Lakes Sidewalk, Lighting and Street Tree project and Culdesac Improvement project: FOREST LAKES SIDEWALK PROJECT: F -58: 100% Landscape Construction Plans (Windham Studio and Abney and Associates): • Next Step: • WSI anticipates submitting final revised 100% landscape and irrigation plans to county staff together with final Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular for bidding by Fri, 10/15. 100% Sidewalk Construction Plans (ABB): • Next Step: • WSI anticipates submitting final revised sidewalk construction plans to county staff together with final Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular for bidding by Fri, 10/15. 100% Sidewalk Lighting Construction Plans (TR Transportation): • Next Step: • WSI anticipates submitting final revised sidewalk lighting construction plans to county staff together with final Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular for bidding by Fri, 10/15. FOREST LAKES CULDESAC PROJECT: F -60: • Next Step: • WSI anticipates submitting final revised 100% culdesac improvement plans and landscape plans to county staff together Windham Studio, Inc, 1 andscape :Architecture, LC 26000365 8891 Brighton Lane, Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 Phone_ (239) 390 -1936 Fax: ( 239) 390 -1937 Gmail: scntrin?windhamsmeLo_ann u��ae.windh am snuiio.com Cj -L) with final Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular for bidding by Fri, 10/15. Please email or call me if you have any questions. 16 la A5 Sincerely, Scott Windham, ASLA Landscape Architect, LA 000 -1516 Windham Stucho, Inc., Landscape Architecture, LC 36000365 8891 Brighton lane, Bonita Spring,, Florida 3-135 Phone: (239) 390 -1936 Fax: (339) 390 -1937 Finail: scottaxxnndhacn,nidio.ccan �l-��x�.rrnndham sh�dio.com �13� 161 1 A5 FOREST LAKES SIDEWALK, F -58 100% OPINION OF PROBABLE COST SUMMARY (Preliminary for committee) Prepared by: Windham Studio, Inc. 10/12/10 WSI AND ABNEY: LANDSCAPE / IRRIGATION CONSTRUCTION Budget Item Estimate Planting Includes 10 % Contingency) $240,707.00 Irrigation Includes 10 % Contingency) $190,000.00 Landscape Lighting Medians and Signs) $25,000.00 Green Screen Includes chain link fence demo $84,000.00 Site Furnishings $16,370.00 New Directory Sin $11,500.00 SUB TOTAL: $567,577.00 ABB: SIDEWALK / STRIPING / DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION Budget Item Estimate Sidewalk, striping, drainage $275,000.90 15 % Contingency $41,250.14 SUB TOTAL: $316,251.04 TR TRANSPORTATION: LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION Budget Item Estimate Lighting Supply and Install $582,959.75 15% Contingency $87,443.96 SUB TOTAL: $670,403.71 GRAND TOTAL: 1 $1,554,231.75 GRAND TOTAL (LESS CONTINGENCIES): 1 $1,386,221.65 'See the attached individual Opinions of Cost for each subconsultant for greater detail. (I4-) 1611A5 FOREST LAKES CULDESACS, F -60 100% OPINION OF PROBABLE COST SUMMARY Prepared by: Windham Studio, Inc. 10/12/10 Bud et Item Estimate Plantin Includes 10 %Contin enc $15,156.19 10 % Contingency $1,515.62 SUB TOTAL: $16,671.81 Budget Item Estimate Mobilization $2,000.00 Clearing and Grubbing $1,500.00 Type'D'Curbing $25,400.00 Cart Storage Concrete Pads $8,808.00 15% Contingency $5,656.20 SUB TOTAL: $43,364.20 IGRAND TOTAL: 1 $60,036.01 1 (GRAND TOTAL: (LESS CONTINGENCIES) 1 $52,864.19 1 *See the attached individual Opinions of Cost for each subconsultant for greater detail. 0 5) INDEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS AND CONSULTANTS October 11, 2010 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Project Manager Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 e, Inc. 1 V 11 H 3M etro Pk wy, Suite 520 Fort Myers, FL 33916 Phone (239) 332 -1300 Fax(239)332 -1789 Re: Forest Lakes MSTU Construction Management Assistance (CMA) Services PO# 4500110199 Change Order No. 2 Dear Mr. Richard: Malcolm Pirnie has been pleased to provide the Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes (Department) CMA Services for the Forest Lakes MSTU since February 2007, and we would like to continue providing these services to the County. These CMA services allow Malcolm Pirnie to function as an extension of the Department's existing staff, assisting with the management of the day -to -day aspects of MSTU projects while keeping the Department integrated in the decision - making processes. This Change Order No. 2 requests an additional 365 days of contract time and an additional $40,000 in funding to continue our services to the County. SCOPE OF SERVICES The services for this project include the following tasks: TASK 050— Project Management This task includes the work effort required for project planning, administration, and coordination. Specific activities included in this task include the following: Managing and coordinating project activities and field personnel to control costs and maintain the project schedule. • Maintaining project files and data systems • Preparing monthly invoices • Providing internal quality control • Internal and external project - related communications q s ✓J`Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest LakesWSTU CMA Services Change Order No.2 October 11, 2010 Page 2 of 3 TASK 100— GeneralTASK 100 — General Consulting Under this task, Malcolm Pirnie provides the Department and the MSTU Committee with experienced professional consultants that provide technical assistance and engineering resources on an as- needed basis. Such assistance may include project planning, budgeting, reviewing documents, and other services as requested by the County. TASK 200 — MSTU 200 — MSTU Meetings Under this task, Malcolm Pirnie will prepare for and attend up to twelve (12) meetings with County staff, stakeholders and /or the MSTU Advisory Board to review project statuses and address outstanding issues. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to performing the work identified in this scope, Malcolm Pirnie will perform Additional Services as requested by the County. The need for such services may arise from the completion of the tasks identified above and cannot be fully defined at this time. However, it maybe determined at some future date that these additional services are necessary to thoroughly complete or implement the Work. Examples of Additional Services may include technical evaluations, preparation of reports, or other activities deemed necessary by the County. It should be noted that the fees for these services have not been included in this scope. Such tasks and their level of effort, associated budgets and schedules will be described in detail in work authorizations to be issued at the time such tasks are requested by the County. Malcolm Pirnie anticipates providing the professional services outlined above for a period of up to one (1) year after Notice to Proceed or until the total contract amount is invoiced. The scope and schedule of services provided in each task above is dependent on the level of services requested by the County and are subject to adjustment during the course of the project so as not to exceed the compensation amount shown below. COMPENSATION Malcolm Pirnie will provide this scope of services under the terms and conditions of Contract 05 -3657 Agreement for Project Management and Oversight Services for a lump sum fee of $40,000. The project budget is based on the scope of work as provided and is subject to cost adjustment resulting from any change in the scope or schedule of work that would exceed the total lump sum fee shown above. 161 1 I Mr. Darry l Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU CMA Services Change Order No.2 October 11, 2010 Page 3 of 3 Malcolm Pirnie appreciates this opportunity to provide this requested scope of services, and will enjoy working with the County on this important project. If you have any questions regarding this Change Order No. 2 scope or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me at (239) 332 -1300. Sincerely, MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. Christopher C. Tilman, P.E. Senior Consultant A403748 16 I 1 Mat or, Pirnie, In 4315 Metro Pkwy, Suite 520 Fort Myers, FL 33916 Phone (239) 332 -1300 Fax (239) 332 -1789 Solutions for Life'" October 7. 2010 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Project Manager Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F -56 —South Woodshire Lane Drainage Swale Piping and Restoration Haskins, Inc. PO# 4500118805, Change Order No. 1 Dear Mr, Richard: Haskins, Inc. (Haskins) is the contractor on the Forest Lakes MSTU (FLMSTU) Bond Issue Project F -56 (Project), and the majority of the work on the Project is adjacent to the existing chain link fence that is along the property line between Naples Bath and Tennis and the FLMSTU. The original scope for the Project involved maintaining the existing fence, but extensive erosion in the Woodshire ditch over the course of the rainy season undercut the fence posts and caused the fence to fall into the project area in many locations. The damage to the fence was aggravated by heavy vegetation (mostly exotics) pushing into and hanging over the fence. The deformation and damage to the existing fence presented an interference to the construction work. As a result, much of the existing fence had to be removed. Also, the extensive erosion required Haskins to place additional fill material in order to provide proper cover and grading for the Project. In order to restore the fence line between the Naples Bath and Tennis property and the FLMSTU, a new fence line must be constructed. However, the existing vegetation along the new fence route must be removed, and overhanging limbs that could potentially damage the fence must be trimmed. Minor regrading work will also be required in a few project areas along the fence route to allow for proper sidewalk installation. The additional work requested in this change order must be completed before Haskins can complete the installation of the concrete curbing and sidewalks in that area of the Project, as the fence installation work would likely damage the new curbing and sidewalk. This Change Order No. 1 from Haskins addresses all of the additional materials and labor that are needed to correct the unforeseen issues resulting from the extensive erosion at the site and complete the Project, and requests an additional $90,300.00 in funding to add the requested scope and its associated work effort to their existing Purchase Order. No additional contract time is requested. 161�' A5 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project F -56 October 7, 2010 Page 2 of 3 SUMMARY OF SERVICES This Change Order #1 amends the original Purchase Order tasks as follows: Task 7 —Fill Material Increases task funding by $45,000.00, from $3,750.00 to $48,750.00, to add 3,000 cubic yards of additional fill material at the contract unit price of $15 per cubic yard. The additional fill material is needed to correct heavily eroded site areas and to complete the existing Project restoration and swale cross section. Task 10 —Mist. Concrete Deletes this line item for $18,000.00 from the Project. Misc. Concrete was put in the Project to address concrete flumes and miscellaneous repair items. This line item is not needed given the project improvements. Task 17 —Vegetation Removal and Trimming Adds new task for $20,500.00 to clear vegetation and remove overhanging tree limbs from the fence route as required for the new chain link fence installation. Existing Melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and other exotics are encroaching the property line and must be cleared from the fence route. Task 18— Removal and Relocation of Chain Link Fence Adds new task for $37,600.00 to remove the existing chain link fence and install approximately 3,200 linear feet of new six foot high, black vinyl coated chain link fence. The new fence will be properly constructed, with 2 -3/8" terminal posts, 1 -5/8" line posts, 1 -3/8" top rail, a tension wire on bottom, and 9 -gauge fabric. The terminal and line posts will be set in concrete- The MSTU will own and maintain the new fence, which is an improvement of the existing fence. Task 19 — Misc. Grading Adds new task for $5,200.00 to regrade portions of fence route along Woodshire Lane to allow for proper sidewalk installation. Since the fence is being removed and relocated, the existing grades along the fence route will be minimized to reduce the sidewalk slopes, which will improve pedestrian safety, access, and ease of maintenance. CONTRACT TIME AND AMOUNT ADJUSTMENTS Under this Change Order No. 1, Haskins requested an additional change amount of $90,300.00. Malcolm Pirnie feels that this is a fair and reasonable request considering the additional work that is needed to correct the unforeseen issues related to the extensive erosion on site and complete the Project. 1611 A5 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project F -56 October 7, 2010 Page 3 of 3 If you have any questions regarding this letter or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me at (239) 332 -1300. Sincerely, MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. Christopher C. Tilman, P.E. Senior Consultant 4037111 161 1 A5 CHANGE ORDER TO WORKORDER TO: Haskins, Inc. FROM: Collier County ATM Department 10956 Enterprise Avenue 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Naples, FL 34104 Forest Lakes MSTU Project F -56 — South Woodshire Blvd. Drainage Swale Piping and Restoration RFQ -08- 5011 -17 6/29/2010 4500118805 Change Order No. 1 9/30/2010 Change Order Description: This Change Order No. I is to add $45,000 (3000 CY @ $15 /CY) to line item 7 for Fill Material which is needed to correct heavily eroded site areas and to complete the existing project restoration. Collier County has requested that exotic vegetation be removed ($20,500), the chain link fence be removed and relocated ($37,600), and the additional sidewalk on Woodshire be properly graded ($5,200). Also, this change order deletes line item 9 for Misc. Concrete ($18,000 credit to the project). Original agreement amount ............................... ............................... $314,312.00 Sum of Previous Changes ..................... ..............................$ 0.00 This Change Order No. 1 Amount ( add) ............ ............................... $90,300.00 Revised Agreement Amount ............................. ............................... $404,612.00 Original contract time in calendar days ................. ............................300 days Adjusted number of calendar days due to previous change orders ...............0 days This change order adjusted time is ...................... ..............................0 days Revised Contract Time in working days ..................... ............................300 days Original Notice to Proceed date .................. ............................... August 2, 2010 Completion date based on original contract time ........................ May 29, 2011 Revised completion date due to change order(s) ........................ May 29, 2011 Your acceptance of this change order shall constitute a modification to our Agreement and will be performed subject to all the same terms and conditions as contained in said Agreement indicated above, as fully as if the same were repeated in this acceptance. The adjustment, to this Agreement shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims arising out of, or related to, the change set forth herein, including claims for impact and delay costs. Prepared by: Darryl Richard, RLA, Project Manager Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Date: Accepted by: L y /i' l f� �____ Date: /O / 1 JM Chambers, Haskins, Inc. Change Order No. I Page 2 6, 1 q 1 /I H 5 Acceptedby: r' __ _. Date: hri i , Malcolm Pirnie, Engineer Consultant Approved by: Date: Pam Lulich, RLA, Manager - Landscape Operations Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Approved by: Date: Michelle Arnold, Director, Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Approved by: _ _ Date: Norman Feder, Administrator, Growth Management Division Approved by: Date: Rhonda Cummings, Contract Specialist Date ATTEST: Dwight E. Brock, Clerk BY: Approved As To Forth and Legal Sufficiency: Print Name: Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA L" Fred W. Coyle, Chairman 1611A5 z4 CONTRACTMORK ORDER MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Forest Lakes MSTU Project F56 PROJECT #: RFQ -085011 -17 PROJECT MANAGER: Darryl Richard CONTRACT M 08 -5011 MOD #: 1 PO #:4500118805 111M Original Contract/Work Order Amount: $314,312.00 (Starting Point) Current BCC Approved Amount: $314,31220 (Last Total Amount Approved by the BCC) Current Contract/Work Order Amount: $314,312.00 (Including All Changes Prior To This Modification) Change Amount: $90,300.00 Revised Contract/Work Order Amount: $404,612.00 (Including This Change Order) Cumulative Dollar Value of Changes to this Contract/Work Order: $90,300.00 Date of Last 8CC Approval Agenda hem # Percentage of the changeover current contract /work order amount 28.7% Formula: (Revised Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: Mav 29 2011 CURRENT: May 29.2011 This change order will: ❑ Add a new Task for $ ❑ Increase Task Number by $ Other — Add budget and additional project tasks as described below. Describe the change(s): This Change Order No. I is to add $45,000 (3000 U Y (a a l 31c r) TO ime Hero r rvr r m Material which is needed to correct heavily eroded site areas and to complete the existing project restoration. Collier County has requested that exotic vegetation be removed ($20,500), the chain link fence be removed and relocated ($37,600), and the additional sidewalk on Woodshire be properly graded ($5,200). Also, this change order deletes line item 9 for Misc. Concrete ($18,000 credit to the project). Specify the reasons for the change(s) (*- 1. Planned or Elective - 2. Unforeseen Conditions r' 3. Quantity Adjustments r- 4. Correction of Errors (Plans, Specifications or Scope of Work) r. 6. Value Added r 6. Schedule Adjustments Note: One or more may be checked, depending on the nature of the change(s). Identify all negative impacts to the project If this change order were not processed: Negative impacts would be additional time and expense and reconstruction of completed project work to accomplish the requested additional work in the future. This change was requested by: FiContractor /Consultant I'I Owner rl Using Department r- CDES L Design Professional /'IRegulatory Agency (Specify) I- Other (Specify) CONTRACT SPECIALIST PARTICIPATION IN NEGOTIATIONS: r Yes r No This form is to be signed and dated. APPROVED BY: Date: Darryl Richard, Project Manager REVIEWED BY: Date: Rhonda Cummings, Contract Specialist Revised 4.10 ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS AND CONSULTANTS October 1, 2010 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Project Manager Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F -56 —South Woodshire Ditch Improvements PO #4500108033 Change Order No. 3 Dear Mr. Richard: Malcolm Pirnie has been providing professional services for the F -56 project, and during the course of the project construction the MSTU Committee and the County staff requested additional work from the contractor to address erosion issues and to improve pedestrian safety and access in the MSTU. This additional work included the following: • Removal of approximately 3,200 linear feet of existing chain link fence and replacement with a new chain link fence. Due to extensive erosion and overgrown vegetation at the site, a significant portion of the existing fence has collapsed and is interfering with the construction work. • Removal and trimming of vegetation along and within approximately two feet of the property line to provide a clear path for the installation of the new chain link fence. • Addition of approximately 2,500 linear feet of concrete sidewalk to connect the sidewalk segment originally planned for this project with the Publix shopping center turnout on Woodshire Drive. This will provide a continuous pedestrian path along Woodshire Lane and will greatly improve the safety and access for the MSTU residents. The requested work was not part of Malcolm Pirnie's original scope, so this Change Order No. 3 requests an additional 92 days of contract time and an additional $33,950 in funding to add the construction management and oversight effort associated with the requested additional contractor scope to our existing Purchase Order. 1 (r � 1611 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 4315 Metro Pkwy, Suite 520 Fort Myers, FL 33916 Phone 12391332 -1300 Fax 12391332 -1789 Re: Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F -56 —South Woodshire Ditch Improvements PO #4500108033 Change Order No. 3 Dear Mr. Richard: Malcolm Pirnie has been providing professional services for the F -56 project, and during the course of the project construction the MSTU Committee and the County staff requested additional work from the contractor to address erosion issues and to improve pedestrian safety and access in the MSTU. This additional work included the following: • Removal of approximately 3,200 linear feet of existing chain link fence and replacement with a new chain link fence. Due to extensive erosion and overgrown vegetation at the site, a significant portion of the existing fence has collapsed and is interfering with the construction work. • Removal and trimming of vegetation along and within approximately two feet of the property line to provide a clear path for the installation of the new chain link fence. • Addition of approximately 2,500 linear feet of concrete sidewalk to connect the sidewalk segment originally planned for this project with the Publix shopping center turnout on Woodshire Drive. This will provide a continuous pedestrian path along Woodshire Lane and will greatly improve the safety and access for the MSTU residents. The requested work was not part of Malcolm Pirnie's original scope, so this Change Order No. 3 requests an additional 92 days of contract time and an additional $33,950 in funding to add the construction management and oversight effort associated with the requested additional contractor scope to our existing Purchase Order. 1 (r � 161 1A 5 ; Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F -56 - Change Order No. 3 October 1, 2010 Page 2 of 3 SCOPE OF SERVICES This Change Order No. 3 adds the following tasks and work effort to the original project scope: TASK 050 — Project Management This task includes the work effort required for project planning, administration, and coordination. Specific activities included in this task include the following: • Managing and coordinating project activities and field personnel to control costs and maintain the project schedule. • Maintaining project files and data systems • Preparing monthly invoices • Providing internal quality control • Internal and external project - related communications TASK 300 — Construction Oversight Services Provide contractor oversight and field direction during the execution of the additional project work, up to twenty -five (25) business days. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to performing the work identified in this scope, Malcolm Pirnie will perform Additional Services as requested by the County. The need for such services may arise from the completion of the tasks identified above and cannot be fully defined at this time. However, it may be determined at some future date that these additional services are necessary to thoroughly complete or implement the Work. Examples of Additional Services may include technical evaluations, preparation of reports, or other activities deemed necessary by the County. It should be noted that the fees for these services have not been included in this scope. Such tasks and their level of effort, associated budgets and schedules will be described in detail in work authorizations to be issued at the time such tasks are requested by the County. SCHEDULE Under this Change Order No. 3, Malcolm Pirnie anticipates providing the requested additional services outlined above for a period of up to 92 days beyond the current contract due date of September 30, 2010, or until the total contract amount is invoiced. COMPENSATION Malcolm Pirnie will provide this additional scope of services under the terms and conditions of Contract 05 -3657 Agreement for Project Management and Oversight Services for a lump sum fee of $33,950. The project budget is based on the scope of work as provided and is subject to cost adjustment resulting from O0) 161 1A5 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F -56 - Change Order No. 3 October 1, 2010 Page 3 of 3 any change in the scope or schedule of work that would exceed the total lump sum fee shown above. Malcolm Pirnie appreciates this opportunity to provide this requested scope of services, and will enjoy working with the County on this important project. If you have any questions regarding this Change Order No. 3 scope or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me at (239) 332 -1300. Sincerely, MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. Christopher C. Tilman, P.E. Senior Consultant A403748 1I) T 0 X m V) 3 Un m T 0 PO m r D m cn cn D D r Z D v r m N T r .'a O D s m PC. a n n m foQsj � E S 4i 1 I LIM, i, } 16/11 A5 i 0 o i r m y Om z v i 4 2 p N m(1 y � � O m y � O n 47� n � m o VZi f r m G7 m Z 0 ION � 9 LIM, i, } 16/11 A5 i 0 o i r m y Om z v i 4 2 p N m(1 y � � O m y � O n 47� n � m o VZi f r m G7 m Z 0 16 I b 6 A FOREST yv v!tiI DR vI` A('I vLs.l 1_,'t K FS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 October 13, 2010 Minutes I. Call to order Meeting was called to order at 10:01 p.m. by George Fogg. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Robert Jones (Excused), George Fogg, Harold Bergdoll, William Seabury (Excused), Dick Barry County: Darryl Richard — Project Manager, Pam Lulich— Manager Landscape Operations, Gloria Herrera — Budget Analyst Other: Thomas Roadman — Malcolm Pirnie, Scott Windham - Windham Studio, Michael Lavin - Public, Darlene Lafferty— Juristaff Ill. Approval of Agenda Add: Vll. A. Easements Harold Bergdoll moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by Dick Barry. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes A. August 25, 2010 Dick Barry requested clarification on the last paragraph of page 3 concerning the intended use of the $450,000.00 Contingency monies. George Fogg stated during the meeting a question was posed if sufficient monies were available to finish Projects. It was noted the $450,000.00 Contingency Budget Line item confirmed adequate monies are available to complete Projects (not Contract Contingency monies.) Harold Bergdoll moved to approve the minutes of August 25, 2010. Second by George Fogg. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. B. September 8, 2010 Dick Barry stated $30,000.00 was previously approved by the Committee for Rock Removal and questioned the following: o The increase in cost for Rock Removal (up to $60,000.00) 161 1 A5 o The expenditure for a Geotechnical Firm to conduct Borings and Rocks are not being discovered Discussion ensued Thomas Roadman responded (4) random Borings were conducted and the additional (Base) Rock Layer was not discovered below Cap Rock at those locations. George Fogg stated a Contract was in place to conduct (4) Geotechnical Borings (through Malcolm Pirnie) prior to Bid Solicitation (for Rock Removal.) Darryl Richard noted: • The additional (Base) Rock Layer discovered in Forest Lakes is not atypical in Collier County - Cap Rock Layer is the standard in Collier County, as reflected in the Geotechnical Report • It is difficult to determine the quantity of Rock in each Lake without considerable testing as the Lakes within the Community are filled with Rock Harold Bergdoll perceived extensive test Boring would be required every 10 ft. to locate all the additional (Base) Rock Layer. After much discussion it was concluded the purpose of Core Boring (Hole No. 3 -Tee No. 4) was to give the Contractor a base line on the anticipated level of Rock. Harold Bergdoll moved to approve the minutes of September 8, 2010 as submitted. Second by Dick Barry. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. George Fogg spoke about the fatal accident that occurred this morning (10- 13 -10) at Forest Lakes Blvd. and Pine Ridge Rd. He queried Staff on the County's solution to the hazardous intersection. Darryl Richard reported the driver was traveling Eastbound on Pine Ridge and struck a (Utility) Pole. Discussion ensued and it was concluded the accident did not occur at Forest Lakes Blvd. and Pine Ridge Rd. intersection. Discussion continued on the dangerous intersection at Forest Lakes Blvd. and Pine Ridge Rd. Staff recommended the Committee contact the Traffic Operations Department at (239) 252 -8192 to address the hazardous intersection. George Fogg moved that the (Forest Lakes MSTU) Board request the Department of Transportation to urgently Study the intersection at Forest Lakes Blvd. and Pine Ridge Rd to resolve the Safety problems. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. 161 1 A5 V. Transportation Services A. Budget Report- Gloria Herrera reviewed the following: (See attached) o Anticipated Ad Valorem Tax $38,100.00 Darryl Richard noted the following on the Ad Valorem Tax: • Forest Lakes MSTU is Funded by (2) separate Cost Centers • Revenue Stream for the Operational Millage Rate - $38,100.00 Gloria Herrera resumed: • Budgeted Operating Expense $355,028.25 • Committed Open P.O.s - $935,450.22 George Fogg questioned the Projected Operating Expense $355,028.25 as it was higher than the incoming Revenue of $58,100.00. He expressed doubt that the Revenue Stream would sustain the MSTU (for FY12) and requested an explanation at the November 10, 2010 meeting. Darryl Richard perceived FY11 Budget monies were acceptable as the Carry Forward is $4,278,000.00. Staff concurred with George Fogg on the inability to maintain the MSTU (in the future) while receiving reduced Revenue and suggested implementing a Long Term Budget Plan. George Fogg requested Staff provide a 3 -5 year Projection for Incoming Revenue and Operating Expenses. Gloria Herrera will confer with Mark Isackson and will provide his response to the Committee. B. Gordon River Extension Maintenance Darryl Richard stated the Letter to the BCC concerning County Funds and Dredging of the Gordon River Extension was distributed to the Committee for approval. (See attached) George Fogg supported the verbiage in the Letter. Thomas Roadman recommended the following: • To submit the Project to the Department Head (Storm Water) to ensure the Project is incorporated into the FY12 Budget during the initial planning phase • Staff maintain contact with the Department Head and review the Storm Water preliminary Budget C. Project Manager Report — Darryl Richard I Chris Tilman - Malcolm Pirnie - The Forest Lakes Master Project List was reviewed. (See attached) Proiect (F -56) South Woodshire Ditch Improvements Darryl Richard reviewed Change Order No. 3 by Malcolm Pirnie in the amount of $33,950.00. (See attached) 161 1 A George Fogg moved to approve $33,950.00 by Malcolm Pirnie for (Construction) oversight and review of Woodshire Drainage System. Second by Dick Barry. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. Harold Bergdoll relayed Resident complaints (Woodshire Ditch) regarding the pile of abandoned concrete. Thomas Roadman suggested Staff contact Haskins to remove the concrete as he has advised them on two occasions with no results. Darryl Richard will contact Haskins to remove the pile of concrete. He noted payment to the Contractor may be withheld if debris is not removed. George Fogg requested an informational Letter be distributed to the Condominium Manger (along Woodshire) concerning the delayed approval for the Contractor Change Order. Staff perceived the Contactor is responsible for notification and will notify the Contractor to draft a letter to the Condominium Manger. Darryl Richard reviewed Change Order No. (1) Haskins for an additional $90,300.00. He stated the Change Order is recommended by Malcolm Pirnie and Staff: (See attached) Harold Bergdoll moved to grant Haskins $90,300.00 to do the work in Change Order No. 1. Second by Dick Barry. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. Darryl Richard reviewed Change Order No. (2) by Malcolm Pirnie for Construction Management Assistance Services to include: • Proposal is a continuation for Base Level of Services • Amount $40,000.00 Harold Bergdoll moved to continue Services (by Malcolm Pirnie) and grant $40,000.00 for new Contract or Change Order. Second by Dick Barry. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. VI. Landscape Architect Report A. Cul-de -Sac Project (F-60) - Discussed under VI. B. B. Sidewalk/Lighting /Street Tree Project (F-58) Scott Windham reported the following: (See attached) • Nearl00% completion on Sidewalk Plans • Finishing up with the Irrigation (includes the modifications) • Power drop installation was requested (of TR Transportation) for Landscape Lighting (Entrance Medians and Signs) • At 100% Completion the following will be submitted to Staff - All Plans with digital files and hard copies - Final Budget - Bid Tabulation for Bid Solicitation in 1611 A� Cul -de -Sac Proiect (F -60) Scott Windham reported the Plans are 100% complete. The following will be provided to Staff in conjunction with submittal of the Sidewalk Project: (See attached) o Plans o Budget Darryl Richard gave the following information on the communication with Resident: • (2) Public Informational meetings are scheduled at Pine Ridge Middle School - October 20`h - October 28th • Cul -de -Sac Residents are reluctant on the proposed Trash Receptacle Staging area - Anticipates the Informational meeting will address concerns or misconceptions by Residents • Positive responses have been received on the proposed Landscaping • The Committee will receive notice of the Public meetings • Sidewalk Plans will be presented at the Public meeting Scott Windham reviewed the Master Plan Presentation Boards for the Cul -de -Sac and HOA Public meetings. (See attached) Harold Bergdoll noted incorrect Street names on the Master Plan Board. Scott Windham will confirm Street names and make the necessary corrections on the Master Plan Presentation Board. George Fogg requested Staff notify Homeowners of the proposed Picnic Table locations (Forest Lakes Blvd.) Scott Windham reviewed Sidewalk (F -58) 100% Budget Breakdown (See attached) • Landscape / Irrigation Construction - Total $567,577.00 • New Directory Sign is included Discussion ensued concerning tapping into the Reuse line. Scott Windham clarified the proposed method is accessing the City of Naples Reuse Line. Darryl Richard stated a meter will be installed and billed to the MSTU. Scott Windham reviewed Cul -de -Sac Opinion of Probable Cost: (See attached) o Total $60,036.01 16 I 1 A5 Harold Bergdoll inquired on the location to place special items for pick up (in the Cul -de -Sac.) Staff clarified the proposed Staging area is for Trash Receptacles only. The special item placement and pick up procedure will not change. Discussion ensued concerning the Public meetings for HOA. After discussion it was determined after communicating with the Property Managers (2) HOA meetings will be conducted: • Woodshire Group • Forest Lakes Group VII. Old Business A. Easements Harold Bergdoll questioned why the RWA Survey (Easements for the Swale Project) was not recorded. 11:53 George Fogg left. Michelle Arnold gave the following response: • Easements were required - It was determined Right of Entry was required • Survey information was needed to identify Properties that Right of Entry would be obtained from 11:55 George Fogg returned. Darryl Richard stated Right of Entry was obtained from Quail Run Golf Club. Harold Bergdoll requested a letter be provided to the (Turtle Lake) Golf Course to resolve the Easement and Right of Entry issue. Staff will request the County Attorneys Office address the Right of Entry and Easement problem with (Turtle Lake) Golf Club. VIII. New Business - None IX. Public Comments Michael Lavin stated he Resides in Woodshire Villas. He questioned if the pool parking areas will be removed. George Fogg replied negative. The parking areas will be Regrade for proper drainage. There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned by the Vice Chairman at 12:01 P.M. 0 161;1 A5 Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage MSTU Advisory Committee George ogg, Vice Chair These minutes approved by the Committee on t (- I() - I C as presented or amended /K, Next meeting is November 10, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Growth Management Division - Construction & Maintenance 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 7 Forest Lakes MSTU Master Project List Updated November 11, 2010 161 1 n ,act r oeam"tam Estimated Schedule Status Estimated Cost Completed Cost Dlflerential Notes OCT 1, 2009 $4 209,523 _ COMMITMENTS AS OF JULY 7, 2010 $1,941,948 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES AS OF Combined old project nos. 14 1 Overlay Woodshire Lane and Forest Lakes Blvd motATED BOND ISSUE PROJECT EXPENSES REMAINING $1,740,655 _ ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE FUNDS REMAINING antl 16 AT COMPLETION (LINE 31) Overlay Forest Lakes Blvd. from Tennis Courts on Woodshire to Project funded by MSTU 1a Gardenia Lane and from service entrance on Woodshire Lane to eted $610,000 $145000 $465,000 funds not bond revenue. Pine Ride Road a rox. 6500 Lf I - Pro ect Com leted16 F -41 - Restore drainage in cul -de -sacs, regrade side yards Mar- Jul 2008 eted $1,050,000 $149,022 $900,978 Project Completed. throw hout sin le famil area F- 47- Overlay cul -de -sacs and Forest Lakes Blvd. from Gardenia Feb - Jul 2008 eted Project Completed. Lane to Main Entrance _- 2 F-42- Overlay Quail Forest Blvd. from Main Entrance to Jan - May 2008 Completed $731,000 $88,586 $642.414 Project Completed. southern end and restore drainage Combined old project nos 4- 3 Quail Run Swale Restoration and Lake Improvements 13 3a F -43- Regrade Swale Nos. 7 -11 and install culverts. Total Feb 2008 - May Completed $147,000 $165,715 - $18,715 Project Completed . regrade length a roximatel 5,974 L.F. 2009 3b F -45 - Regrade Swale Nos. 1 -6 and install culverts. Total Apr - Aug 2009 Completed Project Completed . regrade length approximately 8,415 L.F. with 3c Final change 3c F -45- Regrade Swale Nos. 12 -17. Total regrade length Apr - Aug 2009 order I $333,000 $160,374 $172,626 Project Completed. approximately 11,289 L.F. processing _ 3d F -38- Construct engineered partitions in Lakes 8 and 10 Feb 2008 - Oct Deleted Project Completed. F-47- Overlay Forest Lakes Drive and side streets from Feb 2008 - Jan Completed $495,000 $314,731 $180,269 Project Completed. 4 Forest Lakes Blvd. to south end 2009 5 F - Woodshire Lane Improvements (Phase 1) Mar 2008 - Aug Completed Project Completed. -50 2009 with 3c '6 ,a DR AI�,'$tlpi�plfns All,�,tPrMtllm and 'n M ':94a ,q4P� -f0 pi S; pr.Plre/f thg Ifn"V0*fG 7 F -54- Replace culvert crossing Fairway No. 5 Jun -Oct 2008 Completed $145,235 $66,328 $78,907 Project Completed. 8 F -55 - Forest Lakes Blvd Improvements from Quail Forest May - Sep 2009 Completed $180,000 $68,667 $111,333 Project Completed. Blvd. to Woodshire Lane x if�lEti wn D, `�}tnacitA 3 s x - * t � �. 10 F. 57 Drainage System Mapping and Adjustments Jul 20009 - Feb Final $50,000 $50,000 $0 Project Completed. - 201 Adiustments F - 58 - Sidewalks, Lighting Improvements, and Roadway Aug 2009 - May Delayed pending of Still) $1,590,655 Cost estimate based on 60% design estimate from 11 Tree Plantings 2010 usueme 12 F- 59- Lighting Improvements Jan -Ma 2010 Y Combined with F- 13 F-60 - Cul de sac improvements Jun 2009 - May 2010 owl ed e e t� $150,000 Awaiting 60% cost estimate 14 F - 61 - Drainage system mapping Jul - Dec 2009 Combined with F- 57 15 F -62 - Maintenance Dredging of Lake 8 Jan - April 2010 Completed $100,000 $143,845 1 - $43,845 Completed 3/26/10 16 F - Property Line Wall along Woodshire Lane Oct 2009 - May 5embined wild F- -63 2010 _ 17 F -64 - Roadway Tree Plantings TBD Combined with F- ORIGINAL BOND ISSUE PROCEEDS $6,068,171 BOND - FUNDED PROJECT EXPENSES AS OF SEP 30, 2009 $1,414,048 BOND ISSUE FUNDS REMAINING AS OF OCT 1, 2009 $4 209,523 _ COMMITMENTS AS OF JULY 7, 2010 $1,941,948 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES AS OF JULY 7,2011 $392,964 motATED BOND ISSUE PROJECT EXPENSES REMAINING $1,740,655 _ ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE FUNDS REMAINING AT COMPLETION (LINE 31) $133,956 9 16 i 1 A5 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 4315 Metro Pkwy, Suite 520 Fort Myers, FL 33916 Phone (239) 332 -1300 Fax(239)332 -1789 Solutions for Life "' October 28, 2010 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Project Manager Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Forest Lakes MSTU Speed Limit Study and Signage Plan Dear Mr. Richard: Malcolm Pirnie is pleased to provide the Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes (County) this proposal including scope of work and fees for a Speed Limit Study within the Forest Lakes MSTU. The purposes of this project is to 1) determine the recommended speed limit on MSTU streets in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation speed zoning standards and other applicable guidelines, and 2) to review the existing signage and develop a signage plan that incorporates the results of the speed limit study and is in accordance with the latest edition of the FDOT Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). SCOPE OF SERVICES The services for this project include the following tasks: TASK 050 — Proiect Management This task includes the work effort required for project planning, administration, and coordination. Specific activities included in this task include the following: • Managing and coordinating project activities and field personnel to control costs and maintain the project schedule. • Maintaining project files and data systems • Preparing monthly invoices • Providing internal quality control • Internal and external project - related communications TASK 100 — Speed Limit Study For this task, Malcolm Pirnie will conduct a speed limit study in accordance with the 1997 edition of FDOT Topic #750- 010 -002, Speed Zoning for Highways, Roads, and Streets in Florida. The study will include the following subtasks: lam" �ALCOL�1 IRNIE 16 I 1 A5 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Speed Limit Study and Signage Plan October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 3 Subtask 110— Spot Speed Sampling & Data Collection Malcolm Pirnie will conduct spot sampling of vehicle speeds at five (5) selected locations within the MSTU. Each spot sampling event will consist of measuring the speed of 100 vehicles in each direction or all free flowing vehicles during a two -hour time frame, but in either case will not exceed two (2) hours in length. Speed data collected during the spot sampling will be recorded on FOOT forms. Subtask 120 — Determination of Design Speed for Horizontal Curves Malcolm Pirnie will use a combination of existing survey data provided by the County, field measurements and engineering calculations to determine the recommended design speed of up to ten (10) horizontal curves within the MSTU in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation speed zoning standards and other applicable guidelines. This work, combined with the speed data collected in Subtask 110, will be used to determine advisory speed limits as necessary for each of the horizontal curves, which may be lower than the speed limit for the other MSTU street areas. Subtask 130 — Data Analysis Vehicle speed data collected in Subtask 110 will be analyzed using the 85t' percentile and 10 mph pace methods in accordance with FDOT Topic #750- 010 -002 to determine the appropriate speed limit for the MSTU streets. Crash data, if available, will be provided by the County and analyzed. Subtask 140 — Report Preparation Malcolm Pirnie will prepare a report detailing the activities and findings of the speed limit study. Five (5) copies of the draft report will be submitted for review by the County and the MSTU. Once comments are received, five (5) copies of the final report will be submitted to the County. TASK 200 — Signa¢e Plan For this task, Malcolm Pirnie will review the existing signage within the MSTU and prepare a signage plan in accordance with MUTCD requirements. The plan will be prepared in AutoCAD using existing survey data and plotted on 24" x 36" sheets. Five (5) copies of the draft plan will be submitted for review by the County and the MSTU. Once comments are received, five (5) copies of the final plan will be submitted to the County. TASK 300 — Meetings Under this task, Malcolm Pirnie will prepare for and attend up to three (3) meetings with MSTU and /or County staff to review the project. 0 16 1 1 A5 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Speed Limit Study and Signage Plan October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 3 ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to performing the work identified in this scope, Malcolm Pirnie will perform Additional Services as requested by the County. The need for such services may arise from the completion of the tasks identified above and cannot be fully defined at this time. However, it may be determined at some future date that these additional services are necessary to thoroughly complete or implement the Work. Examples of Additional Services may include technical evaluations, preparation of reports, or other activities deemed necessary by the County. It should be noted that the fees for these services have not been included in this scope. Such tasks and their level of effort, associated budgets and schedules will be described in detail in work authorizations to be issued at the time such tasks are requested by the County. SCHEDULE Malcolm Pirnie will complete the scope of services outlined above within 180 days following receipt of Notice to Proceed. COMPENSATION Malcolm Pirnie will provide this scope of services under the terms and conditions of Contract 09 -5262 County -Wide Engineering Services for a lump sum fee of $38,840. The project budget is based on the scope of work as provided and is subject to cost adjustment resulting from any change in the scope or schedule of work that would exceed the total lump sum fee shown above. Malcolm Pirnie appreciates this opportunity to provide this requested scope of services, and will enjoy working with the County on this important project. If you have any questions regarding this scope or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me at (239) 332 -1300. Sincerely, MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. Qk�' � 04�L Robert H. French, P.E., BCEE Senior Associate A403748 6) 1611A5 I RIGHT OF ENTRY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that QUAIL RUN GOLF CLUB, INC., a Florida non - profit corporation, whose mailing address is #1 Forest Lakes Boulevard, Naples, Florida, 34105 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration to it in hand paid, does hereby grant unto COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, (hereinafter known as "Grantee "), and to Grantee's agents, contractors or assigns, the temporary license and right to enter upon the lands of the Grantor, more particularly depicted on Exhibit "A," for a period of ten (10) year from the date hereof, for the express purpose of placing and /or excavating materials associated with the construction, operation, and maintenance of drainage structures and facilities, including but not limited to ponds, canals, ditches, swales, earthen berms, rip -rap and retaining wall systems, underground pipes, and various types of water control structures. The permissive use and rights granted hereunder are conditioned upon the reasonable exercise thereof by Grantee. Grantee agrees not to unreasonably interfere with Grantor's use of the lands depicted in Exhibit "A ". Grantee shall not unreasonably interfere with ingress and egress to Grantor's lands during the period of construction of the above - referenced drainage improvements. Grantee's right of entry onto Grantor's lands is contingent upon no other provisions, conditions, or premises other than those so stated above; and there are no other prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, undertakings, promises, warranties, or covenants not contained herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name this ai114 day of , 20L, and does hereby affirm that the individual executing same has the Authority to act on behalf of the Grantor, and does intend that the Grantee rely on such authority. QUAIL RUN GOLF CLUB, a Florida Non - profit orporation e. By: Warren McHale President E ' 6 + -�A 5 m z C6 w w m °' ° H o 0. m °v m a •o LLI O v LL 0 W _j m LLJ m a. o: a v CL !p mZ mo Y y c J O V w r R N go LL N O a i s •- a y a x z x m f n w t- w G CY 1, 1 `. W LL w ` w LU d H W a°o - m UN LL .._.. ` �mi Q J Q O Vii' �s M:FS ,j� `:1ig ¢ a x U N N W ¢ O O a U a N W O U N W Y a W O LL 16 1 1 A5 J 16 I 1 STATUS REPORT To: Forest Lakes MSTU Committee cc: Darryl Richard, Collier County ATM Jim Carr, ABB Reid Fellows, TR Transportation, Inc. Chris Tilman, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. From: Scott Windham Date: November 10, 2010 RE: Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Project F -58 Sidewalk Project and F -60 Culdesac Improvements Status Report 5 Committee and team: The following is a brief status report for the Forest Lakes Sidewalk, Lighting and Street Tree project and Culdesac Improvement project: FFOREST LAKES SIDEWALK PROJECT: F -58: Studio and Abney Associates): • Next Step: • WSI has delayed submitting final revised 100% landscape and irrigation plans to county staff together with final Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular for bidding due to the scope expanding to include the street signs. (Please see change order #2 for these additional design services) • Additionally, we are revising the location of the irrigation controller and adding a 7.5 hp booster pump as per staff request. • We are also preparing the water use permit for the City of Naples for the irrigation effluent meter tap. • The plans will be submitted within the month of November following staff review of the street signage plans, specs and budgets. 100% Sidewalk Construction Plans (ABB): • Next Step: • The plans and specs are complete and WSI anticipates submitting final revised sidewalk construction plans to county staff together with final Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular for bidding within the month of November together with the other project plans. Windham Studio, Inc., Landscape Architecture, LC 200(K)365 5891 Br ghton Lane, Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 phone: (239' 390 -1930 Fax: (239) 390 -1937 Finail_ scattrt windharaasnidio.cam w��le.ndndh:�ansmdiwcom 0 100% Sidewalk Lighting Construction Plans (TR Transportation): 16 1 A5 • Next Step: • The plans and specs are complete and WSI anticipates submitting final revised sidewalk lighting construction plans to county staff together with final Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular within the month of November together with the other project plans. Entrance Presentation Board: • WSI is preparing a color rendered Conceptual Entry Plan presentation board for use in the public information meetings as requested by staff. FOREST LAKES CULDESAC PROJECT: F -60: 100% Landscape Construction Plans (Windham Studio): • Next Step: • WSI has delayed submitting final revised 100% culdesac improvement plans and landscape plans to county staff together with final Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular for bidding due to public information meeting feedback and ongoing resident review comments. • Two public information meetings were held (10/20 and 10/28) to present the culdesac designs and general concept for the sidewalk project to the culdesac residents for consideration. It was determined by overwhelming majority that the cart storage pads and curbing were not desired for the culdesacs. Show of hands votes at the well attended 10/28 meeting revealed this as well. As a result, together with staff, we recommend removal of these elements from the project scope. • WSI has reviewed the resident feedback, toured each culdesac with George Fogg and county staff and prepared the attached spread sheet documenting the existing landscape conditions, the original proposed planting designs for the culdesac islands, resident comments and the revised final proposed planting designs. • Once reviewed and approved by county staff, the plans will be revised and submitted together with the Opinion of Cost and Bid Tabulars for bidding. We anticipate this occurring within the month of November. • Together with staff, we discussed the possibility of combining the culdesac project with the sidewalk project due to the limited scope of only a few trees and palms. Please email or call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Scott Windham, ASLA Landscape Architect, LA 000 -1516 Windham Studio, Iuc., I .andscape Architecture, LC 26000365 8591 Brighton Lane, Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 Phone (239) 390 -1936 Fax: (239) 390 -1937 Email Scott @windhamstudio.com w\%w. windha m s mdio.com ivy N Q W O Q R ._ O � W C7 y 2 C y a o m V V O v g .. r LL d q R C r 10 a m y N LL c F m m > C CD a R N m c a_ « C 2 m N 3 v G E O gm o c N to o d L LL 3 � N Z m A 0 Q N F- v J Q ' W 0 W 2 Nom L) 0 000 000 N O (0' 0 tOO f0 [O N M f9 F9 f9 f9 NI If9 t9 f9 OO O O O O 0 O VI O O N O 0 ro °ca o 0 c U a o a 0 a moo$ `m a c o E N a o o c = c a _ a c = E c � O N Q U m Q 2 ani N N w In nc�m �d m b`- N N a d ¢ <d tti ttimm Q f0 H Q w E E U N F 16 1.1 N7 M OJ/ 161 1A5 A i November 9, 2010 Mr. Darryl Richard, Project Manager Collier County Alternative Transportation Modes Department 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Forest Lakes Sidewalk, PO 4500113538 Change Order Request 2, Street Signs and Maintenance Specifications Consultation Darryl: Our original base contract included the selection of a post, sign paddle and mailbox that would match the new light poles which could be utilized in a future phase. Following the public information meetings and the inclusion of these site elements on the conceptual presentation boards, we received enthusiastic feedback from the residents to include the new signs as part of the sidewalk project. Pursuant to staff request, below please find a scope increase proposal to complete a master street sign plan and specifications to replace all of the signs throughout Forest Lakes. Additionally, pursuant to staff request, below please find a scope increase proposal to assist staff in developing maintenance specifications for the proposed sidewalk landscape and irrigation including monthly site inspections and reports for the first 6 months following completion of the landscape project. A. Street Sign Master Plan: Includes the following services: 1. Prepare base plans from county staff supplied master signage plan cad file. 2. Site analysis to verify all street signs and traffic control signs, etc. and update information on plans. 3. Prepare Master Street Signage Plan with specifications. 4. Prepare Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular Task A Fee is $3,868.00 (Three Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty Eight Dollars) See attached Fee Matrix B. Maintenance Specifications Consultation: Includes the following services: 1. Assist staff in preparing maintenance specifications for the sidewalk project landscaping including 3 meetings to collaborate. 2. Prepare Opinion of Probable Cost for the annual maintenance of the project. VCrindham Studio, Inc., Landscipc Archircrnuc, LC 26(Kk) 3(i) 8891 Brighton Lane, Bonita Springs, Florida 3413`, Mimic: (239) 399 -1936 Fax: (239) 390 -1937 Finaii: sa�tt(a>>rindhau�sttadla_mm aAc N-windha;nstudio.com 3. Attend the pre -bid meeting. 161 1 A5 4. Complete a monthly maintenance site walk through with the maintenance contractor for the first 6 months following completion of the initial landscape and irrigation installation. Prepare a maintenance report for submittal to the MSTU Committee. Task A Fee is $3,584.00(Three Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty Four Dollars) See attached Fee Matrix In addition to the above design fees, we have included $250 for reimbursable expenses also identified in the attached Fee Matrix. The total fee for this change order is $5,660 (Five Thousand Six Hundred and Eighty Dollars). Please email or call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Scott D. Windham, ASLA Landscape Architect, LA 000 -1516 Windham Studio, Inc., Landscape Architecture, LC 26000365 8891 Brighton Lane, Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 Phone: (239) 390 -1936 Fur (239) 390-1937 Email: scutt(&windhamsmdio.cam w�«r.�aindhamstudio.com l3 Ilm cc 0� 3000m pGMmvzrm-OOlzrmci v, o Zxvi z,yc mmx ° —m <C m�t1mm 1mnuN �yr07m1A r ~-1D 7ZCD ~'inAm.� <R wmF��AO rO��N<�OnAmn�Z�Z�u on�b�bN; �mAy�l�ymlc�mm'�zm �x�o-+T A OZ �Z/1 c O "'y x2 zi �fji�^' M~ �Nj z m 00. - > Z <m TZ NZ 2 mm T,mOfn j;. 0 � Z ca 0 G O D 3 N D; m Z O x O A m z r >,M O r O m m m z z NNMNNMN MNNMNNNNNNNNNfR fN Nf9 fAb N N N N pN N 50 ppOS p0 Q0 Wp W W OS O OOSOO UIOOSC 8 S 8 S 8 8 8 + A N S O O O O O O O Nn O O S c u r u u Y M fn N <9 M tf. m W o in va O; . o m � � z H O t (l D S O V W all 8 �Qo�oQoQoo SS N C m 4 mY W •P (`p^ J K V_ N (T r p . a �o • og e m w c m NNNN(ANNNNNNNN N_em 16Ai� I2 0 0 Gmizz��Db�mmm N o Timm Cfm/i� ,>o ��ASpTW�Z�AD yy or Pm<ml ;OOCOZA00 0 O O K K 0 0 m 3 2 K y yy pC zy A M M V R M m X a m m 0 y m 0t2 0 O 0, NfAW M(A H1NNfP ayN A I�f9NNNNNNN N N N _yN � O N N A J A J O N P, W O J (n O O A < O << (T W A O O N O O S O 0 VN q 1 N O O O S S S O qO1+ O S S S S S O p O O S OO S S O S C N O S A S C d N N N N j d s�ss_s m >> m �^ rd, S, 00 � m m m mm N M 7 D C 4 d� A 3 3 A A A A A A A A A A A (pn (n (T (T U (T (T tT (n N (n N — (T (TA0 J V tD tD U A J V m A t0 W W N m m W N tO Ql O (T mOTCn O '4 �� NN W C" n@ c o m m 3 3 3 o o y w W 0 @o ? m ]1 '2000 3O R N 2 5 5 m S 20, m'm'm'm a c m m W T m z. m zzzzz < 3 T o D a< � 6 T T T T N N Of O W W O N :i D 7 m rn M NNN bl NNNN(A fp9 N O1 O N � A� T O O M Om T 1 C r r z D w , m O O N O 0 C 16 i,1 iA5 %ORI,I_�ajj'_L., Ift1,�01,N °� vND li Rl IN \i 1. t_, I %.. -, At l + ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34104 November 10, 2010 Minutes Call to order Meeting was called to order at 10:00 p.m. by Robert Jones. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Robert Jones, George Fogg, Harold Bergdoll, William Seabury, Dick Barry County: Darryl Richard - Project Manager, Pam Lulich- Manager Landscape Operations, Michelle Arnold -ATM Director, Gloria Herrera - Budget Analyst Other: Chris Tilman - Malcolm Pirnie, Scott Windham - Windham Studio, Joanne Varner - Public, Michelle McDonald - Public, Donna Stephenson - Public, Darlene Lafferty - Juristaff III. Approval of Agenda Add: V. A. Quality Enterprises Change Order V. The order for Subsequent Agenda items was modified. Discussion ensued concerning VIII. A. Election of Officers George Fogg announced he will not be attending the December meeting. After discussion it was agreed by the Committee to table the VIII. A. Agenda Item until the January meeting. Harold Bergdoll moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by Dick Barry. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. IV. Approval of Minutes- October 13, 2010 Change: IV. B. first paragraph, first bullet should read: The additional Base Rock Layer discovered in Forest Lakes is not "typical' in Collier County. IX., second sentence should read: The parking area will be "regraded" for proper drainage. VII. A., third paragraph, should read: "Quail Run Golf Course" (in lieu of both entries as Turtle Lake Golf Club) 161 1 A5 IV. B., fifth paragraph, should read. Discussion ensued and it was concluded the accident "did occur" at Forest Lakes Blvd. and Pine Ridge Intersection. George Fogg moved to approve the minutes of October 13, 2010 as amended. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. V. Transportation Services A. Quality Enterprises Change Order Darryl Richard reviewed the following timeline: October 13. 2010 o The Committee approved a Change Order for rock removal not to exceed $60,000.00 November 2. 2010 o An Update was received from Quality Enterprises indicating to date the cost incurred is approximately $178,000.00 o The Change Order includes additional items associated with the rock removal - Sod replacement - Fill material • The proposed Change Order is under review by Malcolm Pirnie - Subsequently a MSTU Special meeting may be required to approve the Change Order - BCC approval is required • The Project is under review to determine if deductable monies (unused monies) are available to offset the requested cost changes on the Project Chris Tilman gave additional information on (2) items that increased the cost of rock removal: Recap of Rock removal (south end Lake 4) • Initially a thick layer of rock was discovered which could not be penetrated • Sheet piles were installed at the rock layer level • A Tieback System was designed to reinforce the layer Recent events • During reinforcement of the thick rock layer additional rock was encountered and required removal - Increased Rock removal cost up to $74,000.00 - Current cost to include Soil and backfill $174,000.00 • The Tieback System Quote is an additional $50,000.00 - The proposed Tieback System is under review by Malcolm Pirnie • Noted Walls were shifted to avoid encountering rock - Consequently Backfill cost was incurred 2 'b11A5 „4 Harold Bergdoll inquired on the components in the Tieback System. Chris Tilman replied currently the Tieback System consists of: o 3 ft. X 3 ft. thrust blocks o 1 inch thread stainless steel rods • Turn Buckles on 10 ft. centers • Noted the search for a more conventional method is underway to reduce cost Chris Tilman reported the following: o The Shoreline Stabilization and Sheet Pile Wall installation was over estimated - Substantial deducts from the Projects will transpire o Remaining Lake (5) will conclude the Sheet Pile work by Quality Enterprises Discussion took place on the sizeable amount of Sod in the Quality Enterprise Change Order. After much discussion the Committee requested thorough review by Malcolm Pirnie on the quantity of Sod required for the Project. B. Budget Report- Gloria Herrera reviewed the following: (See attached) • Operating Expense Open P.O.s committed $49,398.41 • Anticipated Ad Valorem Tax $38,100.00 Michelle Arnold reported Staff requested clarification from Mark Isackson on the estimated Ad Valorem Tax Line Item and received the following response: o Property Values have decreased significantly in the Forest Lakes area • Previously the MSTU collected $150,000.00 annually • Presently there is a 46% reduction in Taxable Value George Fogg emphasized the projected $38,100.00 Ad Valorem Tax is not equivalent to the 46% reduction in Taxable Value. Michelle Arnold concurred with George Fogg and noted Staff requested the following from Mark Isackson: • Documentation to reflect the reduction on the Ad Valorem Collection • Identify a (3-5) year Projection for Revenue and Expenses for the MSTU Discussion ensued on the Bond Issue and the date of final payment. Staff stated the Legal Document reflects the Bond will be paid in 2022. George Fogg disagreed and noted the 10 year Bond was issued in 2008 and will be paid in 2018. Staff will request Mark Isackson attend the December 8th meeting for clarification on the Bond issue and the projected Ad Valorem Tax. 16 I 1 A5 C. Gordon River Extension Maintenance Darryl Richard reported Robert Jones expressed concern (to Staff) on the verbiage in the Letter to the BCC regarding County Funds and Dredging of the Gordon River Extension. He requested modifications to the Letter. (See attached) Discussion ensued and the following was concluded: • Robert Jones and Staff will modify the Letter • The revised Letter will be presented to the Committee for approval prior to submitting to the BCC D. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard / Chris Tilman - Malcolm Pirnie - The Forest Lakes Master Project List was reviewed. (See attached) Project (F -56) South Woodshire Ditch Improvements Darryl Richard stated a cost adjustment is required on the (Haskins) Change Order. Dick Barry questioned the $50,000.00 Change Order increase for Haskins and perceived the following: • The Contactor observed the condition of the Swales prior to the Bid award • The amount of dirt required for the Project should have been a consideration for the Contractor prior to submitting a Bid Darryl Richard stated the mitigating factors for the Change Order increase were as follows: o Erosion occurred near the Fence • The deteriorating Fence • Regrading is required after removal of the Fence Chris Tilman gave additional information regarding the increase in soil required: • A significant amount of erosion occurred since the original estimate was drafted • A vast amount of water flows from Naples Bath and Tennis and has accelerated the erosion - A Storm Water collection area is not present at Naples Bath and Tennis Darryl Richard confirmed the following regarding the Change Order: • $90,300.00 was approved by the BCC (on 11/9/10) • The Contractors P.O. will be increased • The Committee will be notified of the Contractor remobilization El 16l 1 A5 Michelle Arnold requested Malcolm Pirnie provide information from the original Quote and a present Quote for documentation purposes (South Woodshire Ditch Improvements.) (F -53) Quail Run Lake Shoreline Restoration and Stabilization o Anticipate completion by mid November VI. Landscape Architect Report A. Cul-de -Sac Project (F-60) (See attached) Scott Windham reviewed Resident input from the Public Meetings: • Majority of Residents are opposed to installing cart pads and curbing • Residents prefer a procedural solution to address cart storage in lieu of installing structures • Minimal Landscape development of the Islands was preferred as they are utilized for guest overflow parking As a result of Resident input at the Public meetings the Cul -de -sacs were redesigned. o A Cul -de -sac Progress Chart was created and consists of the following information: (See attached) - Street Names - Present condition - Original Proposal - Resident Comments - Revised Proposal George Fogg moved to delete the concrete pads and curbing (from F -60 Project) and to adjust the Landscaping as proposed on the Chart (Forest Lakes Cut de sac Progress Chart.) Second by Dick Barry. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. George Fogg moved to combine the (F -60) Cut de sac Project with the (F58) Sidewalk Project. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. B. Sidewalk/Lighting /Street Tree Project (F -58) Scott Windham reported the following: (See attached) • In the process of Obtaining City of Water Use Permits • Lighting Plans are 100% complete • Sidewalk Plans are 100% complete 1611 A5 o It was suggested (by Residents and Staff) to proceed with the Street Sign Project concurrently with the Sidewalk Lighting Street/Tree Project to remain consistent with the Fixtures and Poles installed in the Community - Change Order 2 for Design Services (Street Sign Master Plan and Maintenance Consulting) by Windham Studio was submitted in the amount of $7,452.00 Discussion ensued concerning Median landscaping at the Forest Lakes Entrance and if an additional lane will be installed in the future. Staff responded negative, an additional Lane at the Forest Lakes Entrance is not proposed. Darryl Richard reported the intersection at the Forest Lakes Entrance is under review by Traffic Operations Department. Darryl Richard reported the Parcel Owners of the proposed Picnic Bench Location is requesting reimbursement if the lot is utilized. Discussion ensued on the Picnic Bench Locations. After discussion it was agreed by the Committee to delete the proposed Picnic Table location from the Parcel Owners lot. George Fogg moved to remove Picnic Tables from South Picnic area location across the Street from Lake 5. Second by William Seabury. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Darryl Richard noted the Windham Studio Change Order amount is $7,702.00 as it did not include $250.00 for reimbursable expenses. George Fogg moved to authorize the increase for Windham Design Studio $7,702.00 as per their proposal of November 9, 2010. Second by Harold Bergdoll. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. VII. Old Business Darryl Richard reviewed Right of Entry Document for Quail Run Golf Club. (See attached) Harold Bergdoll requested the return of the original Document to Quail Run Golf Club. Chris Tilman recommended installing a Cable Railing System (stainless steel) on all Bulkheads for Pedestrian Safety. Noted sufficient monies are available in the Budget to install the Railing System. 161 1 A5 e Darryl Richard reviewed a Proposal by Malcolm Pirnie for a Traffic Speed Study. Chris Tilman stated the Signage Plan included in the Proposal will be removed as it is a duplication of Services (proposed by Windham Studio.) It was agreed to table the Proposal until the December meeting. VIII. New Business A. Election of Officers- Previously discussed under 111. IX. Public Comments Joanne Varner, Forest Lakes Condominium Association requested a copy of Easement and Right of Entry Documents from Forest Lakes. Staff will provide Easement and Right of Entry Documents as requested. Michelle McDonald expressed concern on the installation of Trash Receptacles as she perceives they will be utilized for dog waste. Donna Stephenson questioned if the proposed Street Lights may be easily converted to LED in the future. Darryl Richard deferred the item to Scott Windham for review. Pam Lulich reviewed the following Public questions emailed to Staff: • If the MSTU will consider installing a Wall along Pine Ridge Rd. • Remove the unsightly wooden Fences Darryl Richard responded the Fence is located on Private Property. There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned by the Chairman at 12:47 P.M. Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage MSTU Advisory Committee Robert Jones, 'h "an These minutes approved by the Committee on as presented____4_or amended Next meeting is December 8, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Growth Management Division ._ Construction & Maintenance 2885 Horseshoe Drive .South Naples, FL 34104 .'O a -yyyy1 m m ,SH.1yI -1 n ti 3 O O T O r T r A (/ Z m T O z T m. ... Z Z� T A mp T A T D Z 2 C A G n O T a A G O Z m A A Z Z 111 m m r� a CAC A N T T o m D T O y A S a r Z Z A x D A T a (TI < m T m 111 y ~1 m O r 0 m z, A- 0 0 0 D T n O T O ti D Z N m m TO ao m m m m> G N O O D D 41 J Cr m m T m O n A W> Z w 0{ O Z 00 ? T N a a T T y Jy ~( ZI O O O n ZNfZA c D T m 9HT HO�OmZ �D�ZmI (I TAA00 Cny fail- m 0 ti ti D Z _ T Z K N 2m "gy m .CO O A O 0 O< 0 0 3 K 2 0 m;- 2 GI nA y> H > ? O A n A z m 0 O O z 3 r m D g m F OT m X m m m y m X Z O O 0 O D rm !,::� mZOam0, A m a T Z m OTOD O_ fmif M N Mfg N N N M N N M N N N N N f9 N N N N N ffl N N N N M N N N N N N N N w N yy d m OI yW1 P O N N W m J N N C m Am N -� � W 1O qO W N O N fli W W N J N O P N -M pp O1 p p J O O O O N N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O f0 O O O O m p n 8 0 0 0 O O O W m O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O o O O O O > N O O O O O O O O YNi o O O O r m r u m u- u w w M w w w w w N w w w w w N w ... .... N N M N N N N (] mm w wwwww NM Niw www wl NlN www W A W [to I IJIa m °p w u o o Iwlm o w wwwwwwwwwwwww wlQl Nlw www wi N�wwww yN N yN � A A S N N V 4WW1 W- 9 N N Li m J L W W N O N P N O m O m SWUM .... O O O OO OO N N Am .(�!t ON OO I 0O 0O 0 J OmO mfU O O NN J N N m : O O mm W O O O O O T� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IAO O tdO O N m O Sao �Q V_oD i < <vlm _<O m��ii�3T �x m N AI T TnO m n 0 0 0 0 0 ; m y o_ O �� m 8 z O n n 0 3 3 3 3 3 3. ? m `� _ T m m q m m $ 3 3 0 o B� T 'o p m m m w ' O O f v'ti O m Z 3 0 0 0 o m 3 E! n d m r m y O y� O O m tZp ry m m m m m 'm o m m 0 0° 0 d N N S m n G m m m 3 v v G 9 y A N N A d d d N N N N A ANN N d A A A N A 00 O O O W N O O O O O m O W w U O O O p0 O O O O O p O ..... O O 0 0 0 0 0 V b tO b O O 3 (i C) C7 J L7 m W 00000 m n m A N m O J W O p'� O m i J r NCITN {O nTTTTU f/1 l/1 O C7 TNm o ao cB < 3 3 m o m o m ap o m. y o c m m o r y O m No mzzzzz �a d m = m - a D �» T T wwww w wwwwwww ww www wNwww T T O m Om O N O A W ON b m N 4� N N W d N J N N O O O J (n O O m N p O N (n d N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > O O O J O O ' y pq N w wwww w w w w w w w w w w w w w w www w y J OI + N O m N OI m W m A A W W W W 4 m J N A O (li W m m d d m O a -$ $ T O O ry A � m 3 C y N Z Pm m � N O y c N N d N N N Of � W Dl V V CO 1C A CD N Oa 01 OD A V (D O O W W N J M t0 W V O A A C A A W to w A N O O W N O O co -0 T 71 T O O L N N ti n w 0 N N O X X O O ` d N w V Q Q G G G d D) D1 C C C (D (D (D J N D n 0 N to m O Z A co A N V O O O m T Cn O O O N -D�' N O O j j N < tp G N O N a .z N D O O % �. N O N n C N 0 �m m n o. n> � n N ufD, n c m < � m X16 � l A� u m° m N N w m n Z m c' m � a U O (O 2 y C G1 5 1 n Q fU O Q 1 to 10 4A fA N O cwD co W to co co n M o o N w m n+ o rn _ o a w o cn D m N N (WO W ffl to DOj O O n O . N W A O O Iv m co C 91 N T co N N co V 00 O V N ' V W w ti O 0 fA x A 00 m co N to O to O O W f1 v O CA O W tD W r G N V N co -4 N O CD N N A co a m T T T T T T TI -1 T -n T1 -1 -< fA W 4A N 90 wn»oc�o� _ to coo N 49 O O D O G W N O A N cD A co W w to to Q) O O w Cn A 00 W co co O O _ O CD C d W 00 V m O ' c00 2 V N 3 O y C 1 m to to 9 d C N » Cn 01 fA N C) p, O C o f f N O N O N to t N A N G n W V1 C1 O O A W n N u, e,3 O O� O O -1 cn W o �'' m M DO N e3 a o0rnw -4 00 m w N) A aoo A A J co K co O .�.. p w O> O) O) A A C N W D) O CD W O V v CD M fA rfl N W N 1.9 N W W N N N W A 0 N w N N V O V W O v Z EA to N co W O (n fA O O 0 WO p m O O N w O W 4. N cn D O A v W N CD O O 00 O O J O 00 . V O O O O w D) O co � W V EA N W d) N A A A A A A O O A N W O O 000000 p N W co W 4 O n O CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 p p N 0 0 0 0 0 0 p -+ V N O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O O O 4 O N N N d N N N Of � W Dl V V CO 1C A CD N Oa 01 OD A V (D O O W W N J M t0 W V O A A C A A W to w A N O O W N O O co -0 T 71 T O O L N N ti n w 0 N N O X X O O ` d N w V Q Q G G G d D) D1 C C C (D (D (D J N D n 0 N to fA T _ j Cn co O N W O N V O Ln O O O. CD N O V CD Cn O O O N -D�' N O O O O O W 161 1 A5 Forest Lakes MSTU Master Project List Updated November 11, 2010 led t Deecnelion Eiimatatl S.W.11 Ste. Eeimeed Cod Comdotoa C.ee Dlft -elel Neles Combined old project nos. 14 1 Overlay Woodshire Lane and Forest Lakes Blvd and 16 Overlay Forest Lakes Blvd. from Tennis Courts on Woodshire to Project funded by MSTU is Gardenia Lane and from service entrance on Woodshire Lane to Completed $610,000 $145,000 $465,000 funds, not bond revenue. Pine Ride Road (approx. 6500 I.f. Project Completed. I F -41 - Restore drainage in culde -sacs, regrade side yards Mar - Jul 2008 Completed $1,050,000 $149,022 $900,978 Project Completed. throughout single family area 1c F- 47- Overlay culEe -sacs and Forest Lakes Blvd. from Gardenia Feb - Jul 2008 Completed Project Completed. Lane to Main Entrance 2 F42- Overlay Quail Forest Blvd. from Main Entrance to Jan - May 2008 Completed $731,000 $88,586 $642,414 Project Completed. southern end and restore drainage Combined old project nos 4- 3 Quail Run Swale Restoration and Lake Improvements 13 3aF -43- Regrade Swale Nos. 7-11 and install culverts. Total Feb 2008 -May Completed $147,000 $165,715 - $18,715 Project Completed. regrade length approximately 5,974 L.F. 2009 3b F-45 - Regrade Swale Nos. 1.6 and install culverts. Total regrade Apr- Aug 2009 Completed with 3c Project Completed. length approximately8,415 L.F. Final change 3c F45- Regrade Swale Nos. 12 -17. Total regrade length Apr - Aug 2009 $333,000 $160,374 $172,626 Project Completed. approximately 11,289 L.F. processing P 9 3d F -38- Construct engineered partitions in Lakes 8 and 10 Feb 2008 - Oct Deleted Project Completed. 4 F47- Overlay Forest Lakes Drive and side streets from Feb 2008 - Jan Completed $495,000 $314,731 $180,269 Project Completed. Forest Lakes Blvd. to south and 2009 5 F- 50- Woodshire Lane Improvements (Phase l) Mar 2008 -Aug Completed with Project Completed. 2009 3c quality EMerydses aced. 6 F -53- Quail Run Lake Shoreline Restoration and Stablli�tion MaY 2008 -Sep 2010. BCC Approved - 4/13110 $1,153,254.75 contractfw,$1,45325475. on ProJeetUfiderCOristiyctlon,'- 7 F -54 -Re lace culvert crossing Fairway No.5 Jun - Oct 2008 Completed $145,235 $66,328 $78.907 1 Project Completed. 8 F -55 - Forest Lakes Blvd Improvements from Quail Forest May -Sep 2009 Completed $180,000 $68,667 $111,333 Project Completed. Blvd. to Woodshire Lane 9 F- 56- South .Woodshire Ditch Improvements Jul 20Q9 - Sep 2010 Project Under Construction $349,000 - 3404812x, , $55612 C $ $90 S00 td ^ -kr, �IaslclpsCOnbaFt 70 F- 57 - Drainage System Mapping and Adjustments Jul 2009 - Feb Final $50,000 $50,000 $0 Project Completed. 2 10 AdiustmenLS 11 F - 58 - Sidewalks, Lighting Improvements, and Roadway Aug 2009 - May Delayed pending outcome of BVO $1,590,655 Cost estimate based on 60% design estimate from Tree Plantings 2010 issue 12 F -59- Lighting Improvements Jan -May 2010 Combined with F- 13 F-60 - Cut de sac improvements Jun 2009 - May Delayed pending $150,000 Awaiting 60% cost estimate 2010 outcome of BVO 14 F - 61 - Drainage system mapping Jul - Dec 2009 Combined with F- 57 15 F -62- Maintenance Dredging of Lake Jan - April 2010 Completed $100,000 $143,845 - $43,845 Completed 3 /26/10 16 F -63 - Property Line Wall along Woodshire Lane Oct 2009 - May Combined with F- 2010 158 17 F -64- Roadway Tree Plantings TBp Combined with F- ORIGINAL BOND ISSUE PROCEEDSI $6,068,171 o��.� rV �•V �V r �•vy�V , �, �SEP 30. 20091 $1,414,048 BOND ISSUE FUNDS REMAINING AS UFI $4,209,523 $1,941,948 ..- ......_ _... ............. JULY 7,... $392,964 ESTIMATED BOND ISSUE PROJECT EXPENSES $1,740,655 $133,956 161 1 FOREST ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE M.S.T.1U. LAKESADVISORY COMMITTEE Board of County Commissioners 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Board of County Commissioners, A5 For the past 3 years the Forest Lakes MSTU Advisory Board has been completing stormwater improvements throughout the Forest Lakes MSTU with funds acquired through the Forest Lakes Bond Issue (approximately 6.1 million dollars). The MSTU Advisory Board is very satisfied with the results of the improvement projects within the 300 Acres of Forest Lakes MSTU which is comprised of 14 communities with approximately 2,500 residents. Forest Lakes MSTU Advisory Board has been informed by their Engineer Consultant that the downstream condition of the Gordon River Extension canal will eventually cause unusually high staging of the water levels due to an accumulation of silt and vegetation in combination with a 50 year or 100 year storm event. The Forest Lakes MSTU Advisory Board in an effort to have this issue resolved had paid an Engineer Consultant to conduct a study of the canal conditions downstream from Forest Lakes MSTU and how this condition relates to the Forest Lakes MSTU hydrology. The Engineering report found that there was a portion of the Gordon River Extension canal that has become severely blocked and requires immediate maintenance dredging to alleviate the upstream staging effect in order to prevent flooding. Currently the Growth Management Division - Construction & Maintenance Fiscal Year 2011 Budget Plan does not have funding allocated for this project. The required funding is estimated to be $800,000. Therefore, this letter is a request of the Forest Lakes MSTU Advisory Board that the Board of County Commissioners consider this project 'very important' and provide necessary funding. The Forest Lakes MSTU Advisory Board request that the Board place it in a 'high priority status' for the FY -2012 Budget Plan and that it also be given first consideration should funding become available prior to the current Fiscal Year Budget Cycle. Sincerely, Forest Lakes MSTU Committee: Robert H. Jones, Chairman William Seabury, Committee Member Richard Barry, Committee Member George Fogg, Vice Chairman Harold Bergdoll, Committee Member 16 I 1 A5 QUESTIONS ASKED DURING 11 -30 -10 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING & STAFF RESPONSE. 1) What can be done about the appearance of the Staging Area near the Quail Run Golf Clubhouse? Response: The staging area is near Quail Run Golf Clubhouse at the end of Hole #9. Currently there is a large pile of fill material which is being utilized by Quality Enterprises during the F -53 Lake Stabilization Project. As soon as the F -53 Lake Stabilization is completed the fill material will be hauled off and the staging area restored to pre - project conditions. 2) Why is the work at Lake #4 delayed? Response: The work at Lake #4 has been delayed as the contractor encountered a large amount of subsurface rock material. This subsurface rock material is not typical to the Forest Lakes area and required specialized construction techniques to 'tie-back' the bulk -head for lake stabilization. Additional time was required for Engineer Design and also subsequent order of material for installation by contractor. The work should be underway within a 1 to 2 week time- frame with completion by December 31, 2010. 3) Why is the Forest Lakes MSTU installing a parking area on private property on Woodshire Lane? Response: The parking area noted is on Woodshire Lane and has presented a'safety issue' during past rain events in that the parking area floods and overflows onto Woodshire Lane. Since the installation of the sidewalk will require work in the area of the parking area — it is recommended that the parking area (which holds 4 cars) be modified to address the safety concern. 4) What is the Forest Lakes MSTU going to do about the intersection of Forest Lakes Blvd. and Pine Ridge Road? Response: Immediately following the recent accident where there was a fatality— MSTU Liaison Staff met with Traffic Operations Engineer(s) to see what could be done to improve the situation. It was decided that Traffic Operations would review the intersection and look for options to improve the situation. 5) Can the Forest Lakes MSTU install anew fence or planted hedge along the West property line along Pine Ridge Road? It has been noted that the existing fence line does not look good. Can the MSTU do something to improve that area? Response: The Forest Lakes MSTU Committee has reviewed the proposal for improvement to the fence line and chosen to not consider this as an active project at this time. The resident and or residents making the request are encouraged to attend the Forest Lakes MSTU meetings — held every 2nd Wednesday at 2885 Horseshoe Dr. South (at 10:00 am). Call 252 -8192 if you have questions about how to find the meeting. 6) What is the schedule for the Sidewalk, Street Tree, and Lighting Project? 161 l 'A5 Response: Staff anticipates bidding in January 2011 with bid award in February 2011. There after construction is anticipated to be 120 days for the sidewalk portion of the project (Part A). And an additional 120 days for the street tree and lighting project (Part B). With this preliminary schedule staff would anticipate completion by Mid - November 2011. 7) What's going to happen at the intersection of Turtle Lake Court and Forest Lakes Blvd.? Where is the sidewalk going to go? Response: The sidewalk is planned to go on the South side of Forest Lakes Blvd. in the area near the intersection. The existing landscaping, flag pole, and signage will not be negatively impacted by the project. 8) Why is the Forest Lakes MSTU installing a chain link fence on Woodshire? Response: The MSTU is replacing an existing fence that was damaged due to soil erosion within the swale on Woodshire. This replacement will result in an improved appearance of the fence — with black vinyl coated fence material versus the old bare metal chain link fence. 9) Why is this the first notification that some of the residents are receiving regarding this project? Response: The 11 -30 -10 Public Information Meeting was notified to each individual property owner within Forest Lakes MSTU. Therefore 'everyone' in the community was notified at the same time. Staff will follow -up to comments received by the residents and Home - Owners Associations — in order to make sure any project related concerns are addressed. 10) Will the Turtle Lakes Golf Colony sign be moved as part of this project? Response: No, the existing sign will remain where it is presently located. The Designer (Windham Studios) has made every effort to accommodate existing signs, plant materials, and landscape features into the design proposed. 11) Will the MSTU be changing the medians at the front entrance (Forest Lakes Blvd. and Pine Ridge Road Entrance)? Response: The entrance area has been evaluated in the past by MSTU Liaison Staff in coordination with Traffic Operations Engineers. While the affected area is partially within the Forest Lakes MSTU Boundary, the solution has to incorporate the entire intersection in order to improve the conditions. Currently there are no plans to modify the existing median at Forest Lakes Entrance. 12) Can the location of the bench near the single family home area at the Cul -de -sacs be modified? Response: The location of the bench can be modified and possible removal of the bench noted. 13) What is the maintenance cost? And who will be maintaining all the proposed sidewalk, street trees, and lighting? 0 1611 A5 Response: Staff is in the process of performing cost analysis for on -going maintenance. The Forest Lakes MSTU will cover the cost of maintenance of all installations. The MSTU has sufficient funds for the maintenance cost without an increase in millage rate for the MSTU. 14) Is there a penalty for 'early re- payment' of the Bond Issue? Response: MARK ISACKSON 15) Can the MSTU provide lighting on Quail Forest Blvd.? Response: The inclusion of additional lighting on Quail Forest Blvd. will be presented to the Forest Lakes MSTU Committee per this request. While there is very little room for sidewalks along Quail Forest Blvd. —the installation of lights should not be technically difficult and should be easily achieved. 16) What can the MSTU do about bikers on the sidewalks? Response: There currently is no plan to do anything about those who would use the sidewalks for bicycles. 17) Can something be done to help the turtles (sliders) in the lakes? They look like they need a special rock to sit on? How do they get out of the lake? Response: There currently is no specific plan to address this particular concern. Staff will consult with specialist in wildlife and fisheries to evaluate this concern. � d-2- 1611 INDEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS AND CONSULTANTS November 29, 2010 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Project Manager Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F -53 PO #4500098562 Change Order No. 3 Dear Mr. Richard: A5 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 4315 Metro Pkwy, Suite 520 Fort Myers, FL 33916 Phone (239) 332 -1300 Fax(239)332 -1789 Malcolm Pirnie is pleased to provide the Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes (County) this requested scope of work for Additional Services for the above - referenced project. The purpose of this Change Order No. 3 is to amend Malcolm Pirnie's scope of services and delivery schedule under PO 4500098562 to account for additional services needed to complete the project. The construction schedule was extended due to unforeseen rock present at three of the lakes, which required a corresponding extension of our construction oversight services. Additional services (i.e. New Task 300) are also needed to complete the Lake #4 bulkhead installation. SCOPE OF SERVICES The additional services requested for this project include the following tasks: TASK 200 — Construction Management and Inspection Services During the construction phase, Malcolm Pirnie will assist the County by providing the following services: • Provide full -time construction inspection during the course of the construction work for up to forty - five (45) working days and additional project administration needed for anticipated construction schedule. For the purposes of this scope, full time is considered to be eight (8) hours per working day. NEW TASK 300 — Lake #4 Tieback design Due to the unforeseen field conditions at the site, the bulkhead for Lake #4 could not be installed as originally designed. Under this scope, Malcolm Pirnie will coordinate with the vinyl sheetpile manufacturer and design a tieback system that will provide the necessary restraint for the bulkhead. Two (2) sets of detail drawing(s) of the tieback system, signed and sealed by a Florida registered Structural Engineer will be provided to the County upon completion. 0�> 1611 A5 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Project No. F -53 Change Order No. 3 November 29, 2010 Page 2 of 2 ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to performing the work identified in this scope, Malcolm Pirnie will perform Additional Services as requested by the County. The need for such services may arise from the completion of the tasks identified above and cannot be fully defined at this time. However, it may be determined at some future date that these additional services are necessary to thoroughly complete or implement the Work. Examples of Additional Services may include technical evaluations, preparation of reports, or other activities deemed necessary by the County. It should be noted that the fees for these services have not been included in this scope. Such tasks and their level of effort, associated budgets and schedules will be described in detail in work authorizations to be issued at the time such tasks are requested by the County. SCHEDULE Malcolm Pirnie anticipates providing the professional services outlined above for a period of up to seventeen (17) calendar days beyond the current work order completion date of December 14, 2010, for an estimated completion date of December 31, 2010. COMPENSATION Malcolm Pirnie will provide this scope of services under the terms and conditions of Contract 05 -3657 Agreement for Project Management and Oversight Services for a lump sum fee of $59,480. The project budget is based on the scope of work as provided and is subject to cost adjustment resulting from any change in the scope or schedule of work. Malcolm Pirnie appreciates this opportunity to provide this requested scope of services, and will enjoy working with the County on this important project. If you have any questions regarding this scope or need any additional information, please feel free to contact Christopher Tilman, P.E. or me at (239) 332- 1300. Sincerely, MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. Robert H. french, P.E., BCEE Senior Associate r. ( | � }§ \� ( 16 1 1 A5 ! §) !z! �� / )}a=; ;a; )/ . . . . :. . . . )} ..... / /ƒ ;,�,��!\Li \ ) ! |! § | ) ) k ■ ! ul 0 * , !. „ n■ iL ! ,.0 ! §) !z! �� 1611 A b Malcolm P(rnie, Inc 4315 Metro Pkwy, Suite 520 Fort Myers, FL 33916 Phone(239)332 -1300 Fax(239)332 -1789 Solutions for Life" December 8, 2010 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Project Manager Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Project F -53 Quality Enterprises Change Order #1 Dear Mr. Richard: Malcolm Pirnie has been providing construction management services on this project since construction began on Lake 7E in August. Rock that was not identified in the geotechnical investigations was encountered at Lake 7E, and the contractor, Quality Enterprises (QE), asked for a meeting with us and the County to determine the best way to proceed. Two options were available, either 1) stop the project and process a change order for the unforeseen rock, or 2) have QE continue working an keep a running total of the rock removal costs. All partied agreed that in order to maintain the project schedule, QE would continue working and a change order would be processed at the end of the project when all final quantities were known. We have been tracking the quantity overages with QE throughout the project, and now that the majority of the work has been completed, we can provide a projection of what the final quantities are expected to be. Based on those projections, which have been verified by QE, the sections below provide an explanation of each projected line item variation, including the change in material quantity and costs. ITEM 2 — SHORELINE STABILIZATION We estimated the original bid quantity of shoreline stabilization at 9,925 linear feet, and the final installation length projected at the end of the project is 8,295 linear feet, a difference of 1,630 linear feet. Total shoreline stabilization credit = 1,630l.f. x $33.33/I.f. _ ($54,327.90) ITEM 3 — BULKHEAD INSTALLATION We estimated the original bid quantity of bulkhead installation at 1,745 linear feet, and the final installation length projected at the end of the project is 1,229 linear feet, a difference of 516 linear feet. Some bulkheads were reduced in length slightly from the original design, so the materials ordered for those bulkheads will have to be paid for, but should not be more than $6,000.00. Total shoreline stabilization credit = 516 Lf. x $409.20/I.f. _ ($211,193.64) 16 1 1 A5 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F -53 — CIE Change Order No. 1 December 8, 2010 Page 2 of 3 ITEM 4 - SODDING (419 BERMUDA) Additional 419 Bermuda sod was required to restore golf course areas disturbed by construction equipment. We had estimated the original quantities based on the shortest access point, but in some cases during construction (i.e. Lake 2) the contractor was required to go a longer route. Total Sodding (419 Bermuda) cost addition = 138,269 square feet x $0.44/sf = $60,838.36 ITEM S - SODDING (MISC.) Additional miscellaneous sod was required to restore condo and residential areas disturbed by construction equipment. We had estimated the original quantities based on the shortest access point, but in some cases during construction (i.e. Lake 2) the contractor was required to go a longer route. Total Sodding (419 Bermuda) cost addition = 85,550 sf x $0.39/sf = $33,364.50 NEW ITEM 10 - ROCK REMOVAL During the design phase of the project, four geotechnical bores were conducted (one each at Lakes 5, 7E, 15, and 16). The borings indicated cap rock at all locations, and at Lake 15 a secondary rock layer was indicated. The removal of cap rock was expected, and was included in QE's unit pricing for bulkhead installation. However rock that was not identified in the geotechnical investigations was found at Lakes 4, 7E, and 16. The rock at Lake 7E turned out to be a disposal site for construction materials and large loose rocks. At Lake 16, rock and construction debris was encountered during the initial setup, and the bulkhead location was field adjusted away from the building to avoid the rock. Even with the adjustment, rock was encountered and had to be removed at the west end of Lake 16. Rock was also encountered and removed at the south end of Lake 4. At each location (Lake 4, 7E, and 16), additional fill material was needed to fill the voids left after the rock removal and to backfill areas where the bulkhead locations were adjusted. The additional backfill areas created by shifting the bulkhead locations also required the use of additional sod to complete the work. Total rock removal cost addition (including rock removal, additional fill material, and additional sod) = $135,972.00 NEW ITEM 11— LAKE 4 TIEBACK SYSTEM Extensive rock was encountered at Lake 4, approximately 15 feet below grade and 5 -6 feet thick. QE attempted to remove the rock, but due to the heavy vibration of the equipment and the close proximity to the building structure, the County, MP, and QE agreed that the best course of action was to drive the sheetpiles to the top of the rock layer and design a tieback system to provide additional restraint for the bulkhead, as the sheetpiles could not be driven full length. The tieback system design was reviewed by QE and priced at $35,300. 9 161 1 A5 Mr. Darryl Richard, RLA Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Issue Project No. F -53 — QE Change Order No. 1 December 8, 2010 Page 3 of 3 FINAL PROJECTIONS The original bid quantities and the final projected quantities are shown in the table below. ITEM NUMBER DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE CITY SCHEDULED VALUE PROJECTED CITY PROJECTED VALUE 1 Mobilization LS $36,162.50 1 $ 36,162.50 $ 36,162.50 2 Shoreline Stabilization LF $33.33 9,925 $ 330,800.25 8,295 $ 276,472.35 3 Bulkhead Installation LF $409.20 1,745 $ 714,054.00 1,229 $ 502,906.80 4 Sodding (419 Bermuda Sod) SF $0.44 30,000 $ 13,200.00 168,269 $ 74,038.36 5 Sodding (miscsod) SF . $0.39 20,000 $ 7,800.00 105,550 $ 41,164.50 6 Fill Material CY $8.25 1,900 $ 15,675.00 1,900 $ 15,675.00 7 Aluminum Handrails LF $30.58 850 $ 25,993.00 850 $ 25,993.00 8 A2000 PVC 18" LF $116.60 30 $ 3,498.00 30 $ 3,498.00 9 A2000 PVC 12" LF $50.60 120 $ 6,072.00 120 $ 6,072.00 10 Rock Removal $ 135,972.00 11 ILake 4 Tieback $ 35,300.00 TOTALS $1,153,254.75 $ 1,153,254.51 We are conservatively projecting that the final change order for this project will be a net zero dollar change at the original contract value of $1,153,254.75. If you have any questions regarding this letter or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me at (239) 332 -1300. Sincerely, MALCOLM PIIRRNIEE,,jINC. Christopher C. Tilman, P. E. Senior Consultant 01 16 I 1 A5 STATUS REPORT To: Forest Lakes MSTU Committee cc: Darryl Richard, Collier County ATM Jim Carr, ABB Reid Fellows, TR Transportation, Inc. Chris Tilman, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. From: Scott Windham Date: November 8, 2010 RE: Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Project F -58 Sidewalk Project and F -60 Culdesac Improvements Status Report 5 Committee and team: The following is a brief status report for the Forest Lakes Sidewalk, Lighting and Street Tree project and Culdesac Improvement project: FOREST LAKES SIDEWALK PROJECT: F -58: 100% Landscape Construction Plans (Windham Studio and Abney and Associates): • Next Step: • A public information meeting was held at the Quail Run Golf Club on 11/30 to review the entire project. The standing room only event generated much public comment which we are distilling and addressing with staff. A follow up meeting with the Turtle Lake residents has been set for Thurs, 12/9 for further review and comment. • WSI completed a preliminary sidewalk layout site meeting with Malcolm Pirnie on the south end of Woodshire Lane. The sidewalk alignment was field adjusted due to existing trees and various utilities. WSI will now revise the base drawing and planting plans accordingly. • The irrigation plans have been revised to include the relocated controller and booster pump station. • The water use permit has been submitted to the City of Naples for the irrigation effluent meter tap and we are waiting on approval / feedback. • WSI has completed the Master Signage Plan and specifications. • WSI has continued to hold on submittal of the final revised 100% landscape and irrigation plans to county staff together with final Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular for bidding in order to Windham Studio, Inc., Landscape Architecture, LC 26000365 8891 Brighton Lane, Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 Phone: (239) 390 -1936 Fax: (239) 390 -1937 Email: scott@windhamsmdio.corn www.windhamsmdio . com �� address the public information meeting feedback and Wolsj�re I sidewalk field adjustments related revisions. .L 1 • WSI anticipates that the plans will be submitted within the month of December following staff review of the street signage plans, specs and budgets. 100% Sidewalk Construction Plans (ABB): • Next Step: • The plans and specs are complete and WSI anticipates submitting final revised sidewalk construction plans to county staff together with final Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular for bidding within the month of December together with the other project plans. 100% Sidewalk Lighting Construction Plans (TR Transportation): • Next Step: • The plans and specs are complete except for the FPL power drops for the entry landscape lighting and WSI anticipates submitting final revised sidewalk lighting construction plans to county staff together with final Opinion of Probable Cost and Bid Tabular within the month of December together with the other project plans. Entrance Presentation Board: • WSI completed a color rendered Conceptual Entry Plan presentation board which has been used in the public information meetings as requested by staff. FOREST LAKES CULDESAC PROJECT: F -60: 100% Landscape Construction Plans (Windham Studio): • Next Step: WSI has combined the minimal culdesac planting plans into the sidewalk project landscape plans as requested by staff. Once reviewed and approved by county staff, the plans will be revised and submitted together with the Opinion of Cost and Bid Tabulars for bidding. We anticipate this occurring within the month of December. Please email or call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Scott Windham, ASLA Landscape Architect, LA 000 -1516 Windham Studio, Inc., Landscape Architecture, LC 26000365 8891 Brighton Lane, Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 Phone: (239) 390-1936 Fax: (239) 390 -1937 Email: Scott @wincUiamstudio.com www,. xvin dh ams to dio. c om 1611 A5 g<C-i Lox OzKrx�- 2O'nm0()'m S 3 C N N d N ry W a d (p w d } J O d d 3 m g. gpo 1pQr=0000 �. � ��'m UUQ? mm'3'm 2'm om a. A' a[CTS idfi ryc oN do (Cpp P ry fl_.O��a7 f6a R- 0 W d? 5 = w � - R- O < cb n? �o N �Si '-I � `zi d ��s N C v z 32 <.d 3o m m 3 d 30°d J 2 Oc oa ami 0 0 ' 0 3 2 3 0 4 � O N P m a m � = o m X O c o n J 0 � 5 5 y v m 3 3. N m d J W D nnn n° a3 a3 3oOO�� 03007' �^ o � � � m OO m N O � � O � c.c2 c)vxOmn�.oyq C92 J =g c v m and m0 S dOF_.vo �m 2 T-g vnvN N d d �C)3m Sa�iS yy OR yOd� a0 m m N N d N N N° O m ° C N d ooJ c d oq o m m m° { m N m V� y [y[ff N y N d � A m 3° m N d d N N d ry-i N ° 3 d 3 m J J d Z j 0 Z? ZZZ7ZZZZZZZxZ 0 0 n b 0 0 0 0 0 Zj.11Z2Z 90 0 't N 0 CD O O jp j O ry 3 }o33J3 nn 3 �g S d'c� �mZ 10 O ' �J N n r F m d_ N q F 7_ m G n g1x�A x xx x D e n D jD °n 3 a m 3� x-i�x 3 3 '� x A.T1;o '� 3 m 3 3 r G "wog �. N C7 m 2S. N =°` x. N �. %'NS. xda°�`� 0 a. J ^NJ'. T? vi, CJ TI O o Zdm wom� a�mNOwApdJyJ SO 23 J d P N a 0 o m �N yOJ m Od n odNm� o d m 5 x ° m 3 o m J 3 d v d v O m S 3 N N J N A W a v O O M d � O 3 m S � o S N X g m o � n c r m m D n v 0 O O m m W N n m D A 3:E D Mp i ss w eC 161 1 A5 LIGHTING SPECS UPDATE To: Forest Lakes MSTU Committee _ cc: Darryl Richard, Collier County ATM From: Scott Windham Date: _ November 8, 2010 RE: Forest Lakes MSTU Bond Project F -58 Sidewalk Project and F-60 Culdesac Improvements Lighting Update Committee and team: The following is a brief update report for the sidewalk light fixtures specifications. • Is the Omega Fixture available in LED? • No. However, Sternberg does have a few other fixtures which do come in LED for your consideration. Please note that LED fixtures typically cost 2 -5 times more than the specified traditional high pressure sodium. • Another long life alternative: • The Omega fixture does come with an induction system alternative. TRT has requested further information from the vendor so they can compare the existing plan layout they have already completed, versus the impact induction lighting would have on the project. Induction is considered "greener" because of the Irfe of the induction light itself. Induction lights last up to 100,000 hours versus 20,000 or so for high pressure sodium. Total cost of ownership is also decreased with induction due to fewer outages, lowering maintenance costs. • Is an upgrade primer based powder coat available for the lights 1 poles to maximize life and minimize fading? • Sternberg does offer such an upgrade alternative and this powder coat has been used on a few other projects in Naples. TRT is waiting on price information. • The mounting bracket specified will dictate a 20' pole rather than the 15' pole specified and may need to change: • Upon final review of the OHPM mounting bracket and Lexington pole combination, the bracket assembly is 4' tall and will require a 20' pole to accommodate the specified 15' mounting height. We recommend using the slightly simpler OGPT model in order to keep the shorter poles. Please call or email me if you have any questions. IX indhmu itudu,, inc. Lamkc.ip'� Archuccnit,, I (.lbwut3(o RI g6t,m I- IIIc.l3.miL, pntn!77.I l,md_t i I I I t ).td: �rixt n'•. +. ❑iJl t i,ulu� c ni .vwndli: t,,,ain iut -C�in1 RECEIVED Fiala _� ----� 61 1 A'-6 ')c 1 ? a ✓ vember 1, 2010 �enning __.._ Coyle --� MINUTES OF THE MEETING Ofo LLIER COUNTY GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY BOARD Naples, Florida, November 1, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 6:00 PM in a REGULAR SESSION in Conference Room "C" of the Golden Gate Community Center, 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Jim Klug VICE CHAIR: Bill Arthur Darrin Brooks Peggy Harris (Excused) Kaydee Tuff (Excused) ALSO PRESENT: Vickie Wilson, Community Center Suo✓fB64z i item �: l ^-,BAs Co. V 161A6 i ovember 1. 2010 L Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 6:06 PM by Chairman James Klug III. IL Attendance — Establish a Quorum A quorum was established. III. Approval of Agenda Bill Arthur moved to approve the Agenda as submitted Second by Darrin Brooks. Motion carried 3 -0. IV. Approval of October 4, 2010 Meeting Minutes Bill Arthur moved to approve the October 4, 2010 Minutes as submitted. Second by Darrin Brooks. Motion carried 3 -0. V1. Old Business A. Recreation Highlights Vickie Wilson suggested having a "Walk Through" at the next meeting. B. 6' Fence from Tax Collector to Lucerne Staff suggested the Advisory Board give direction on `to and from" locations for fence quotes. Staff reported light poles have not been delivered. Light poles deliveries lake a minimum of 12 weeks. Staff stated delivery of poles should be delivered in December 2010. Light Poles are scheduled to be installed and available for Frontier Days. VII. New Business A. Monthly Budget —None. .lames Klug inquired on plans for the Christmas Tree Walk. Staff recommended asking 4 or 5 different organizations to decorate Christmas "frees to display. The Center's December schedule includes Sunday services, a Breakfast with Santa Event scheduled for December 11 and a Civic Association meeting scheduled for the 13. Staff suggested all trees be decorated by December I 1 °i. At that time, trees would be up for 3 weeks and will not in shape to give to a needy family. Staff recommended contacting Kaydee Tuff for additional comments. VIII. Member Comments James Klug suggested "Public Comments" on agenda be moved from IX position to V for future meetings. 1611A6 November 1, 2010 Discussion was made on the number of monthly meetings the GGCC Advisory Board was required to hold. Discussion was made on using volunteers to supplement staff hours and shortage of staff issues. It was suggested to create a "Friends of the Park" organization. Jim King stated he was willing to go to different organizations and solicit volunteer assistance. It was noted the Center works with the Kiwanis and the Kiwanis Key Club provide help with some events. Staff stated a gentleman, who previously worked for Collier County as a volunteer, had approached her to volunteer. It is possible he may be able to help coordinate volunteer efforts. IX. Public Comments — None. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was moved and seconded to adjourn. The meeting adjourned by order of the Chair at 6:30 PM. COLLIER COUNTY GOLDEN GATE. COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY BOARD Jartye King 111, Chairman/ �f / These Minutes were approved by the Committee /Board on f �j� as presented_ or as amended 161 1 A6 ✓ January 4, 2011 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER b/ 303RT31 ADVISORY BOARD Hiller --_, Henning Coyle Naples, Florida, January 4, 2011 rartaU 33X:................. LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 6:00 PM in a REGULAR SESSION in Conference Room "C" of the Golden Gate Community Center, 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Jim Klug (Excused) VICE CHAIR: Kaydee Tuff Bill Arthur Darrin Brooks Peggy Harris Misc. homes: ALSO PRESENT: Vickie Wilson, Community Center Supervisor Date: Item #: -, i,". 161 A6 January 4, 2011 I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 6:07 PM by Co- Chairman, Kaydee Tuff. 11. Attendance - Establish a Quorum A quorum was established. 111. Approval of Agenda Bill Arthur moved to approve the Agenda as submitted. Second by Darrin Brooks. Motion carried 4 -0. IV. Approval of December 6, 2009 Meeting Minutes Bill Arthur moved to approve the December 6, 2009 Minutes as submitted Second by Peggy Harris. Motion carried 4 -0. V. Public Comments - None. VI. Old Business A. Recreation Highlights -Discussed after VIII. B. 6' Fence from Tax Collector to Lucerne - Discussed after VIII. C. Flag Pole Lighting - Discussed after VIII. D. Meeting Schedule - Continued after VIII. Darrin Brooks notified the Advisory Board he has a scheduling conflict with the regular monthly meeting schedule due to serving on another committee and would need to leave future meetings by 6:45 pm. Kaydee Tuff responded the Advisory Board will try to accommodate Darrin Brooks and address future agenda items requiring voting during the first part of the meeting. She asked if he would make himself available by cell phone for the duration of each meeting. E. Tropical Fest - Addressed after VIII. VII. New Business A. Monthly Budget - Addressed after VIII. VIII. Member Comments Bill Arthur reported the field lights were now working. The field lights are manually operated and turned on only when required. VI. Old Business A. Recreation Highlights Vickie Wilson reported the following: 161 1 A6 January 4, 2011 o The Women's Club, Naples Bridge Club, Grace Lutheran, Kiwanis and Lions Clubs, GGCC decorated and donated the Christmas trees to the Center. 4 of the 6 decorated Christmas trees were donated to needy families. GGCC co- partnered with Kiwanis Club and held "Breakfast with Santa" on December 1 1 with over 350 in attendance. B. 6' Fence from Tax Collector to Lucerne Vickie Wilson reported the receipt of one estimate from Carter Fence Company in the amount of $4,995. Staff will research and review with County and Fax Collector office. C. Flag Pole Lighting Staff reported a Purchase Order was issued to Bentley for less than $2,000 to install a light on flag pole. Staff voiced concerns over installing a light on the building directed at the flag with the possible light projecting glare on automobile windshields and possible vandalism. Staff reported the Center had been burglarized over the Christmas holiday. It was discovered the morning of December 28 "i. There was an alarm system in place which had been turned off due to the number of false alarm calls to the police. Advisory Board will discuss security system issues and installing internal cameras at the next meeting. D. Meeting Schedule Vickie Wilson reported the GGCC MSTU Advisory Board is currently required to meet once a month. An indefinite modification to the meeting schedule must be approved by the BCC. Staff reported the field lighting was tested in December. Lights installed are not even close to specifications. The poles are satisfactory but the lamps only project approximately 5' of lighting that should project 40' or more. Tony Roberto has contacted the installation firm to do an inspection of lighting. Kaydee Tuff requested Staff have a representative from Delta Lighting Systems at the next meeting to explain the issue to the Advisory Board. Vickie Wilson stated she would ask Tony Ruberto and a representative from the lighting firm to attend the February meeting. E. Tropical Fest -None VII. New Business A. Monthly Budget — None. 16 I 1 A 6 Jaq*ary 4, 2011 It was noted Advisory Board requested Annie Alvarez communicate with Staff to notify the GGCC MSTU Advisory Board when she will not be present at meetings. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was moved and seconded to adjourn. The meeting adjourned by order of the Chair at 7:48 PM. COLLIER COUNTY GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY BOARD These Minutes were approved by the Committee/Board on ca - 7 -�� as presented -'�e or as amended 4 Fiala / Hiller Henning Coyle ,Vdg. xw, a„etium eapa«tion (GAC) Monday, July 26, 2010 6:30 p.m. Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District Station 10 132401mmokalee Road Naples, FL 34120 G1i � Jason Bires — Property Acquisition Specialist, Real Property Management Toni Mott - Manager, Real Property Management Distribution: Treasurer's Report I. Call to Order - This evening's meeting of the Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee was called to order by Chairman Jeff Curl at 6:30 p.m. Chairman Curl asked if there was any discussion, changes, etc. regarding tonight's agenda. There were no comments and a motion to approve the agenda as presented was made by Karen Acquard. A second to the motion was made by David Farmer. With no further discussion, the agenda was approved unanimously. Approved 4 -0 II. Approval of Minutes - The next item on the agenda is the approval of the minutes from the May 24, 2010 GAC Land Trust Committee meeting. There was no discussion with regard to the minutes. A motion to approve the minutes as presented was made by Pat Humphries and a second to the motion was made by David Farmer. With no further discussion, the minutes were approved unanimously. It should be noted that Karen Acquard abstained from voting on this item as she was absent from the May 24, 2010 meeting. Approved 3 -0 Mix. Cones: Date b a I IteM # LT- 161 1A7 �, III. Approval of Treasurer's Report - The next item on tonight's agenda is the approval of the Treasurer's Report. Staff presented the Treasurer's Report to the Committee. The total cash balance in this month's Treasurer's Report is $1,412,680.68 and the available cash balance is $1,405,480.68. A motion to approve the Treasurer's Report as presented was made by David Farmer and a second to the motion was made by Karen Acquard. With no further discussion, the Treasurer's Report was approved unanimously. Approved 4 -0 IV. Max Hasse Park Expansion - The next item on the agenda is a presentation from the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department in which they are requesting funding for the expansion of the Community Center at the Max Hasse Community Park. Marla Ramsey, Barry Williams and Shannon Peters were in attendance on behalf of the Parks and Recreation Department. Parks and Rec made a presentation to the Committee in which they explained the reason for their request. Parks and Rec provided a visual aid in the form of a poster to assist in their presentation. Parks and Rec advised that they would like to add 2 rooms that would provide flexibility for multiple uses. Parks and Rec stated that they would like to expand the Community Center because it is too small for some of the activities that they would like to have at the facility. Parks and Rec has stated that DCF has recently changed the rules pertaining to how much space (square footage) is required per child at a facility. Parks and Rec stated that the quotes they have received for the completion of the expansion are approximately $500,000. Parks and Rec stated that they have about $200,000 to put towards the project and they would like to request that the Land Trust to provide funding for the remaining $300,000. Karen provided history that at the time the dollars were provided for the fitness center, there were concerns as to whether or not it would be large enough to accommodate the residents. Karen advised that it was the Committees recommendation that it be built so it could be expanded in the future if need be. Karen said the Committee advised at that time, if additional dollars were needed to expand in the future that Parks and Rec was to come back to the Committee. Karen stated that in that respect, Parks and Rec is asking the Committee to fulfill the promise that they made at that time. The Committee agreed to provide the funding for the expansion and a motion was made by Karen Acquard to provide 60% of the total cost of the project, not to exceed $300,000. A second to the motion was made by David Farmer. With no further discussion, the motion was approved. Approved 4 -0 V. Max Hasse Park Sound System (Update) - All of the equipment has been purchased and received in good order by Max Hasse Park. All invoices have been provided to Real Property Management for reimbursement. Max Hasse Park Supervisor Shannon Peters was in attendance at this evening's meeting and she gave a brief presentation to the Committee. Shannon stated that the sound system has already been used several times by the park and that they anticipate using it very often for different events at the park. VI. Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park - This item was added to the agenda by staff due to a public records request by Duane Billington in which he was asking for the phone numbers and email addresses of the Committee members. The Committee raised a question about how the money derived from the sale of reserved land is being used. Staff advised that the way the conveyance was processed for the 47 acre parcel, was that there were be a bigger regional park at the northeast site as opposed to the 47 acres. When the transaction was done, verbiage was put in the Deed to Parks and Rec that states that Parks and Rec has the ability to utilize the 47 acre 161 1 A7 + parcel to assemble additional acreage at the northeast site. If it is not being used for that purpose, it would revert back to the Land Trust. The Committee asked if the property can be sold and the money used to assemble. Staff advised that we will prepare an RLS to the County Attorney's Office to get clarification. The Committee then asked who has the final say over the money in the Land Trust. Staff advised that the Board of County Commissioners has the final say as to how the money is spent. The Committee can only make recommendations. Ultimately, the Board of County Commissioners can override the Committee's recommendation. VII. Transportation /School - Vanderbilt Beach Road Expansion - Staff added this item to the agenda as an informational item. Staff advised that the parcel in question in currently on the reserved list and is reserved for the School. Staff advised that the Transportation Department is interested in acquiring this property for the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Project. Staff has been in contact with both Transportation and the School over the past few months but as of this meeting, no progress has been made and Staff has not been able to get anything definitive from the School nor a definite time frame from Transportation for the project. The Committee agreed that no action would be taken at this time and this will be addressed when more definitive information is available and provided by Transportation and the School Board. VIII. GAC Land Trust Social Networking Site (Update) - Staff advised the Committee that there is nothing new to report on this item. The information for the site has been put together and passed along. Staff will follow up on the status of the website before the next Committee meeting. IX. Meeting Schedule - The next item on the agenda is a discussion regarding the frequency of the Land Trust meetings. At a previous meeting, the Committee inquired as to whether the meetings had to be held bi- monthly or if they could be held quarterly. Staff advised the Committee that they have researched the Agreement, Amendments and Ordinances and could not find anything that stated definitively how often meetings had to be held. Staff advised that they have also obtained a legal opinion from the County Attorney's Office in which the County Attorney advised that there was nothing that stated when or how often meetings should be held. Based on the opinion of the County Attorney and the research done by Staff, it has been determined that it is ultimately up to the Committee to decide how frequently they would like to meet. Prior to the Committee making their decision, Staff advised that their opinion was to keep the meetings on a bi- monthly schedule. With that being said, the Committee briefly discussed the options and opted to remain on a bi- monthly schedule with the possibility of canceling meetings if it was determined that there is nothing on the agenda that cannot wait until the next meeting. It was agreed that in order for a meeting to be canceled, it had to be unanimous among the members of the Committee. Staff will present the Committee with the agenda three weeks prior to each meeting and the Committee members will have until the end of that week to provide their preference to hold the meeting or cancel. If it is not unanimously decided to cancel that meeting by the end of the week, the meeting will take place and the agenda will be posted for public notice two weeks prior to the meeting. )�114A7 I X. Signing of Approved Minutes - The next agenda item is the signing of approved minutes from the past meetings. There were minutes to be signed by Jeff Curl as well as Karen Acquard. Jeff and Karen both signed the approved minutes and returned to staff. XI. Mileage Reimbursement - The next item on tonight's agenda is regarding mileage reimbursement. Staff advised the Committee that they had received communication from the Board of County Commissioner's Office regarding mileage reimbursement for advisory board members. Each Committee member was provided a packet pertaining to the mileage reimbursement policy. Information in the packet advises that if any advisory board members travel more than 20 miles round trip for the meetings then they would be eligible for mileage reimbursement. XII. Land Trust Funds - The next agenda item is regarding the topic of land trust funds and who the funds actually belong to. This was originated at a previous meeting. Staff advised that they have received an opinion back from the County Attorney's Office regarding the funds and it is the opinion of the County Attorney that the funds in the (JAC Land Trust belong to the Board of County Commissioners and not the Land Trust. The Land Trust Committee is simply an advisory board and can only make recommendations on how the Board of County Commissioners spends or disburses the money. The Land Trust Committee cannot determine how or where to invest the money that is in the Land Trust. XIII. Public Comments /Other Discussion - There was no public comment or other discussion. XIV. Next Meeting Date -Monday, September 27, 2010 -The next proposed meeting date is Monday, September 27, 2010. This date was agreeable to all Committee members. XV. Adjournment - With no further business to discuss, Chairman Jeff Curl called for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by David Farmer and a second to the motion was made by Karen Acquard. The motion to adjourn was approved unanimously and this meeting of the Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee was adjourned at 8:23 p.m. Approved 4 -0 Jefif , Chairman 1v I I K/ X (Vale waaftwww =rte >� Monday, July 26, 2010 6:30 p.m. Big Corkscrew Island Fire District Station 10 Committee Members Chairman: Jeff Curl Vice - Chairperson: Karen Acquard Member: Stephen Greenberg Member: David Farmer Member: Pat Humphries AGENDA 1. Call to Order II. Approval of Minutes — May 24, 2010 ►II. Approval of Treasurer's Report IV. Max Hasse Park Expansion - Marla Ramsey & Barry Williams V. Max Hasse Park - Sound System (Update) V1. Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park VII. Transportation /School - Vanderbilt Beach Road Expansion VHI. GAC Land Trust Social Networking Site (Update) IX. Meeting Schedule X. Signing of Approved Minutes XI. Mileage Reimbursement XIL Land Trust Funds XIII. Public Comments /Other Discussion XIV. Next Meeting Date— Monday, September 27, 2010 XV. Adjournment 1611 A7 , 4 jy Memorandum r� 1 To: Ian Mitchell, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners From: Jason Bires Property Acquisition Specialist Date: November 30, 2010 A -7 RECEIVED NOV 3 0 2010 Coats of County Commik4Wnetm Subject: Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee Meeting Minutes — Signed by Chairperson Ian, Please find attached to this memo the Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee meeting minutes signed by the Chairman along with the meeting agendas. The following minutes were signed by Chairman Jeff Curl. Thank you. Attachments as stated July 26, 2010 September 27, 2010 Real Property Management Department Biala Hiller Henning Coyle Coletta ar,t emp <<,AC> 16147 Monday, September 27, 2010 6:30 p.m. Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District Station 10 13240 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34120 I� I, i' G7i R Jason Bires — Property Acquisition Specialist, Real Property Management Distribution: None I. Call to Order - This meeting of the Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee was called to order by Chairman Jeff Curl at 6:30 p.m. Jeff called for a motion to approve the agenda as presented. A motion to approve the agenda was made by David Farmer and a second to the motion was made by Karen Acquard. The agenda was approved unanimously. 4 -0 II. Approval of Minutes July 26, 2010 - The next item on the agenda is the approval of the minutes from the July 26, 2010 meeting. Pat Humphries inquired into the sound system at the Max Hasse Community Park. Pat stated that she had heard that people were not happy with the sound system. David Farmer stated that the sound system was not as loud as anticipated but that all of the speakers have not been used. There was no further discussion regarding the minutes and Chairman Jeff Curl called for a motion to approve the minutes as presented. A motion to approve the minutes was made by Karen Acquard and a second to the motion was made by Pat Humphries. The minutes were approved unanimously. 4 -0 Misc. Corres: Date: Item #: "11 A 7 1' III. Approval of Treasurer's Report - The next item on the agenda is the Treasurer's Report. Staff advised that they did not receive a Treasurer's Report from Finance for this evening's meeting. IV. Max Hasse Park Expansion (Update) - Staff advised the Committee that this item will go before the Board of County Commissioners at their October 26, 2010 meeting. V. GAC Land Trust Social Networking Site (Update) - Staff advised that there has not been any progress with this item. Staff asked the Committee if they would like to pursue this. After a brief discussion, the Committee advised Staff not to pursue this item any further at this time. VI. Public Comments /Other Discussion - Staff advised that they had received two applications for the upcoming vacancies. Staff advised that they had spoken to applicant Karen Pandey earlier in the day and it was determined that at this time, Ms. Pandey would not be able to participate in the Committee due to her work schedule. Ms. Pandey stated that she would be working Monday evenings for at least the next year. The Committee recommended that Staff keep in touch with Ms. Pandey and keep her apprised of the goings on of the Committee. A question was raised as to whether Ms. Pandey would be available if the Committee met another night. Staff advised that the topic of switching nights was brought up previously but Monday was determined to be the best day for everyone. Per the Committee's recommendation, Staff will keep in touch with Ms. Pandey and will determine if she is interested and if another day of the week for the meetings would be better. The next application was for the reappointment of Karen Acquard. A motion was made by David Farmer to reappoint Karen Acquard to the Land Trust Committee. A second to the motion was made by Pat Humphries. Karen Acquard's reappointment was approved unanimously with Karen Acquard abstaining from voting. 3 -0 VII. Next Meeting Date - Monday, November 22, 2010 - Staff advised that the next scheduled meeting date of November 22, 2010 happens to be the Monday before Thanksgiving. Nobody was opposed to this date at this time but it was mentioned that depending on the agenda, the meeting could be canceled as per the policy adopted at the July 26, 2010 meeting. At this time, the next meeting is tentatively scheduled for Monday, November 22, 2010. VIII. Adjournment - With no further business to discuss, Chairman Jeff Curl called for a motion to adjourn. A motion for adjournment was made by David Farmer and a second to the motion was made by Karen Acquard. The motion to adjourn was approved unanimously and this meeting of the Golden Gate Estates Land'frust Committee was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. 4 -0 Jefftui%J�I(airman cV (Vale (;aft" zindaJ 0 ammmtv Monday, September 27, 2010 161 1 6:30 p.m. Big Corkscrew Island Fire District Station 10 1 Committee Members Chairman: Jeff Curl Vice - Chairperson: Karen Acquard Member: Stephen Greenberg Member: David Farmer Member: Pat Humphries AGENDA 1. Call to Order II. Approval of Minutes — July 26, 2010 Ill. Approval of Treasurer's Report IV. Max Hasse Park Expansion (Update) V. GAC Land Trust Social Networking Site (Update) VI. Public Comments /Other Discussion VII. Next Meeting Date — Monday, November 22, 2010 VIII. Adjournment 16 1 1,A 7 Memorandum xx'l': ,.'.n .ini nr: irm,i.: To: Ian Mitchell, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners From: Jason Bires Property Acquisition Specialist: Date: November 30, 2010 Subject: Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee Meeting Minutes — Signed by Chairperson Ian, Please find attached to this memo the Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee meeting minutes signed by the Chairman along with the meeting agendas. The following minutes were signed by Chairman Jeff Curl. Thank you. Attachments as stated July 26, 2010 September 27, 2010 Real Property Management Department 1611'A8 IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMITTEE April 28, 2010 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance v' ri =.a1� Hlile; III. Approval of Agenda Flannin i r� IV. Approval of Minutes — March 24, 2010 - .ieata V. Code Enforcement Report — Weldon Walker VI. Transportation Services Report A. Budget — Caroline Soto B. Project Manager Report — Darryl Richard VII. Transportation Maintenance Report — CLM VIII. Landscape Architect Report — JRL Design IX. Community Redevelopment Agency X. Old Business XI. New Business XII. Public Comment XIII. Adjournment The next meeting is May 26, 2010 at 4:30 p.m. One Stop Career Center 750 South 5th Street immokatee, FL 34142 Misc. ,,Tres. Date: Item 0-L ,-rips .o: Fiala ✓ FG CNtL1J 6 rHHenning DEC 0 6 2090 Coyle IMM(!Y °` A4°FImBVAUTIFICATION NNI ADVISORY COMMITTEE October �7. 20I0 16 A8 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance Ill. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes -August 25, 2010 V. Code Enforcement Report - Weldon Walker VI. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard VII. Transportation Maintenance Report - CLM VIII. Landscape Architect Report - JRL Design IX. Community Redevelopment Agency X. Old Business A. Water Symposium XI. New Business A. November Meeting XII. Public Comment XIII. Adjournment The next meeting is November 24, 2010 at 4:30 p.m. One Stop Career Center 750 South 5th Street Immokalee, FL 34142 Misc. .Orres: Date: Item # K I. II. III. IV. V. Fiala low- ` Henning Coyle R - CFI /g�.j) IMMOIa ��FICAT[ON M.S.1- t EC 9 6 2010 ADVISORY COMMITTEE Norember 17, 2010 AGENDA Call Meeting to Order Attendance Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes - October 27, 2010 Code Enforcement Report - Weldon Walker VI. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard VII. Transportation Maintenance Report - CLM Vlll. Landscape Architect Report - JRL Design IX. Community Redevelopment Agency X. Old Business XI. New Business A. December Meeting XII. Public Comment XIII. Adjournment a.,4D05R 1611A8 The next meeting is December 22, 2010 at 4:30 p.m. One Stop Career Center 750 South 5th Street Immokatee, FL 34142 Misc. Corres: Date: Item #: - Aies to: .:. Report Date: November 17, 2010 1611 'A Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Immokalee MSTU Project Status (IMM -23) - ACTIVE- Christmas Lighting Project 11- 17 -10: Staff is coordinating with Trimmers Inc. to install garland on the lights. Where there exist 120 volt outlet they will have lights. (IMM -23)- ACTIVE- Banner Project 11- 17 -10: Carrot -Top will be providing an `updated' sample. Order will be confirmed upon approval of sample. (IMM -22) - ACTIVE- Cross -Walks & Sightline Study P. O. 94500118491 (dated 6 -16- 2010); RFP #08 -5060 Annual Landscape Architectural Services 11- 17 -10: RWA 100% survey delivered on 11 -15 has been forwarded to JRL for review. (IMM -21) - COMPLETED - Immokalee MSTU Irrigation Antenna Tower Project 11- 17 -10: Antenna completed (IMM -20) - ACTIVE- First Street & Hwy 29 Survey I1- 17 -10: Survey is 100% completed. (IMM -19)- ACTIVE- I" Street Irrigation /Landscape Refurbishment Project 11- 17 -10: Design is 100% completed. Committee to review quote from EB Simmonds and Ag Tronix for installation. (IMM -18) - ACTIVE- Hwy 29 Irrigation /Landscape Refurbishment Project I I- 17 -10: 100% plans received from JRL. (IMM -17)- ACTIVE- "Edgerrin James Sign" 1 1- 17 -10: confirmation of `private property' suitable for installation is pending. (IMM-16) - ACTIVE- "Miles ahead" Sign 11- 17 -10: Staff confirms 2 signs have been installed. Traffic Ops reviewing additional locations. (IMM -15) - ACTIVE - ONGOING -LA Maintenance Consulting Work Order for JRL; Landscape Architectural Services I I- 17 -10: Ongoing Services from JRL Design (IMM -11) -- ACTIVE - ONGOING- Roadway Maintenance: BID #09 -5264 11- 17 -10: NTP Issued under new Contract 409 -5264, "Immokalee Road MSTU /MSTD Landscape Maintenance" WOO 161 1 jA8 E.Q. SIMMONDS 3750 Enterprise Avenue Ste. #300 ELECTRICAL. INC. Ph: (239) 643 -2770 Naples, Florida 34104 -3659 STREET LIGHTING • UTILITIES • GENERATORS Fax: (239) 643 -6873 INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL Estimate and Contract Date: 11/06/10 C.0 Government Transportation Services Division Quote #: 1012106 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Fl 34104 Ph: (239) 252 -5775 Fax: (239) 252 -6627 Attn: Darryl Richard darrylrichard @colliergov.net We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: Immokalee MSTU 1" St South Irrigation upgrades Hookup and wiring for one Irrnet, six Piccolos One Building roof mount tower and grounding 680' directional boring 1080' open trenching Twisted shielded cable as used previously Hook up of service and Bermad on north end Total Material and Labor 561.610.00 THIS CONTRACT EXCLUDES PERMIT, INSPECTION, IMPACT AND UTILITY FEES. We hereby propose to furnish the above complete in accordance with the above specifications for the sum of Sixty one thousand six hundred ten and no /1001h Dollars. Payment to be made as follows: Draws upon request. It is the responsibility of the purchaser /owner to provide adequate access to the job site. If during the course of the job it becomes necessary to traverse sidewalks, driveways, grass or sod, flowerbeds, sprinklers, etc. Every effort will be made to avoid any damage. Should breaks occur as a direct result of our machinery, repairs maybe made at additional cost to the Owner. All material used in this contract is guaranteed to be as specified, and the entire job is to be done in a neat and substantial manner. Any alteration or deviation from the specifications herein agreed upon involving extra cost of labor and material will be executed upon either a written or verbal order for same, and will become an extra charge over the sum mentioned in this contract. Purchaser agrees to pay interest charges of 1 1/2% per month which is an annual rate of 18 %. In the event payment is not made, purchaser agrees to pay all costs and expenses of collection including interest and attorneys fees. Estimate valid for 30 days. Signed by ACCEPTANCE OF ESTIMATE The foregoing terms, specifications and conditions are satisfactory, and the same are hereby accepted and agreed to, and hereby authorize you to execute the same. Date Signed by AGRONIX SPECIALIZING IN MOTOROLA IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239 - 657 -5519 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOATM /Transportation FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3301 Tamiami Tr E, Bldg F 7th Flr. Naples, FL 34112 16 1.1 IA8 4 QUOTATION /PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO. I1/l/2010 1748 QUOTE, GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya e ag- tronix.com W W W.AG- TRONIX.COM Page I TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLC ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL Immokalee Main Street and 1st Street Irrigation Project Immokalee Sheriffs Station F4864A IRRInet -M AC 12 DO and 4 DI, w/ Radio Kit (Radio 1 1,462.50 1,462.50 Ready) FUE5522A CDM750 Radio 450- 512MHz 1 -25W 1 888.00 888.00 FLN3707 CDM Install Kit 1 120.00 120.00 967 -0159 Power supply, switching, in:85- 264VAC, out:12VDC, I 1 10.00 110.00 12.5A, 150W, power factor Corr 493711 Cable/ antenna kit 17ft RG58 phantom MHz 450 -470 1 42.00 42.00 451969 LMR400 20' Antenna cable w/ conn (I.MR400) 1 60.00 60.00 710 -1300 12v Battery (25AH) Sealed 2 115.00 230.00 TS I Technical Services (Re Assemble and Burn In) 6 75.00 450.00 Circle K Irrient M F4864A IRRInet -M AC 12 DO and 4 DE w/ Radio Kit (Radio 1 1,462.50 1,462.50 Ready) V314AS Add AC 4/121/0 Expansion Kit 1 450.00 450.00 FUF,5522A CDM750 Radio 450- 512MHz 1 -25W 1 888.00 888.00 FLN3707 CDM Install Kit 1 120.00 120.00 967 -0159 Power supply, switching, in:85- 264VAC, out: I2VDC, 1 110.00 110.00 12.5A, 150W, power factor eorr FLN9588A 110/24v AC Transformer ( Irrinnt M) 1 160.00 160.00 MLB -I2 -AC Surge Protector AC 4in /l2out 2 378.00 756.00 51020 -WM Leviton Surge Protection 1 189.00 189.00 7299 -NW (8299 -... GFI W /Switch and Cover Leviton (I5Atnp) 1 39.00 39.00 TP7010 (T -11) Single Gang Box 1 4.15 4.15 493711 Cable/ antenna kit 17ft RG58 phantom MHz 450 -470 1 90.00 90,00 61600 Mini UHF Male Crimp -RG58 Connector 1 4.00 4.00 TOTAL QUOTE, GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya e ag- tronix.com W W W.AG- TRONIX.COM Page I AGRONIX SPECIALIZING IN MOTOROLA IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239 - 657 -5519 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOATM /Transportation FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3301 Tamiami'rr E, Bldg F 7th F'Ir. Naples, FL 34112 161 la$ QUOTATION /PROPOSAL Sonya DATE QUOTE NO. 11/1/2010 1748 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. @ag-tronix.com W WW.AG- TRONIX.COM TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLC ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL SB -24DSS SS Enclosure DD 24W X 36H 24D (County to Supply 1 0.00 0.00 from Stock) PED -24DSS SS Pedestals 24W X 12H X 20D (County to Supply from 1 0.00 0.00 Stock) TS1 Technical Services (Assembly and Burn in) 4 75.00 300.00 Remote Piccolo XR's F4614A PICCOLO -XR 1/I (From Collier County Stock) 1 0.00 0.00 F4614A/V379AH PICCOLO -XR 2/2 (From Collier County Stock) 2 0.00 0.00 F4614AN 118AG PICCOLO -XR 4/4 (From Collier COunty Stock) 2 0.00 0.00 F4614A/V 118AG PICCOLO -XR 4/4 1 932.00 932.00 AG- SPH0920CIB._ Pedestal I lousing 9 "W x 20 "H Diameter "No Pad Lock" 6 109.00 654.00 ABH Aluminum Battery Holder 6 10.00 60.00 ANT -5 5ftxl "x 1/4" aluminum flat bar Piccolo XR antenna 6 15.50 93.00 bracket SP -2 2'ftxl"x1/4" Aluminum Flat Bar (Bracket for BSP -2 -7) 6 10.00 60.00 TSI Technical Services 18 75.00 1,350.00 IR- 910- WO- P -X -... Bermad 900" Series 2" Hydrometer, Magnetic Drive, 24V 2 495.75 991.50 AC Sol. NC, Threaded Globe, 1Pulse /1 OGal (NON BID ITEM) FTOTAL $12,075.65 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. @ag-tronix.com W WW.AG- TRONIX.COM AGRONIX SPECIALIZING IN MOTOROLA IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239 - 657 -5519 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOATM /Transportation FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3301 Tamiami Tr E, Bldg F 7th Fir. Naples, FL. 34112 QUOT�I j i IONIPROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO. 11/15/2010 1754 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya @ag- tronix.com WW W.AG- TRONIX.COM TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLC ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL Moisture Senors OPTION 2575 GroPoint Lite Sensor 4 -20ma V Analog 1 175.00 175.00 MIF -N Isolated 2 Wire Analog Converter 4 -20mA to 400 -3600 1 220.50 220.50 P/H (11Iz), P. Supply 12V DC 610 -0004 Sealed Lead Acid Battery (Rechargeable) 12V 1 6350 6350 TS] Technical Services (Install unit and setup in ICC) 4 75.00 300.00 This is for one sensor setup at desired depth. It's been a pleasure working with you! TOTAL $759.00 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya @ag- tronix.com WW W.AG- TRONIX.COM AGRONIX SPECIALIZING IN MOTOROLA IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239 - 657 -5519 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOATM /Transportation FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3301 Tamiami Tr E, Bldg F 7th Flr. Naples, FL 34112 A8 Q QUOTk YIONiPROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO. 11/15/2010 1755 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. SonyaCa))ag- tronix.com W W W.AG- 'T'RONIX.COM TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLC ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL Immokalee MSTU ICCCS ICC Terminal Control Unit (NON -BID ITEM) 2 450.00 900.00 (I'0 PROGRAM NEW MOTOROLA IRRfNFT M UN I'I') USB /SERIAL ADT USB to Serial Port Adaptor (NON -BID ITEM) 2 11.00 22.00 SERIAL /ETHER... Serial to Ethernet Adaptor W /Cable (NON -BID ITEM) 2 41.00 82.00 Thank you for your business. TOTAL M $ I ,004.00 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. SonyaCa))ag- tronix.com W W W.AG- 'T'RONIX.COM C 0 N Z 0 L T K K L 0 m Inches O N ? W O O O O O O O p O O O O O 1611A8 N O O f❑ 0 0 2: I � C g w , T J7 T m m C CL m T AGRONIX SPECIALIZING IN MOTOROLA IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239 - 657 -5519 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOATM /Transportation FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3301 Tamiami Tr F., Bldg F 7th Fir. Naples, FL 34112 16111 U QUOTATION /PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO. 11/1/2010 1748 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya mag- tronix. com W W W. AG= PR ON IX. COM TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLC ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL SB -24DSS SS Enclosure DD 24W X 3611 24D (County to Supply 1 0.00 0.00 from Stock) PED -24DSS SS Pedestals 24W X 12H X 20D (County to Supply from 1 0.00 0.00 Stock) TS1 Technical Services (Assembly and Burn in) 4 75.00 300.00 Remote Piccolo XR's F4614A PICCOLO -XR 1/1 (From Collier County Stock) 1 0.00 0.00 F4614AN379AH PICCOLO -XR 2/2 (From Collier County Stock) 2 0.00 0.00 F4614AN 118AG PICCOLO -XR 4/4 (From Collier County Stock) 2 0.00 0.00 F4614AN 118AG PICCOLO -XR4 /4 1 932.00 932.00 AG- SPH0920CI B... Pedestal Housing 9 "W x 20 "H Diameter "No Pad Lock" 6 109.00 654.00 ABH Aluminum Battery I folder 6 10.00 60.00 ANT -5 5ftxI 'xl /4" aluminum Flat bar Piccolo XR antenna 6 15.50 93.00 bracket SP -2 2'ftxl "xl /4" Aluminum Flat Bar (Bracket for BSP -2 -7) 6 10.00 60.00 TSI Technical Services 18 75.00 1,350.00 IR- 910- WO- P -X -... Bermad 900" Series 2" 1- lydrometer, Magnetic Drive, 24V 2 495.75 991.50 AC Sol. NC, Threaded Globe, I Pulse /I OGaI (NON BID ITEM) TOTAL $12,075.65 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya mag- tronix. com W W W. AG= PR ON IX. COM J.RL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 51^ AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239 -261 -4007 I611#8 4 &1?@ h0DftC T'Cb ghud 1?(@P@pIR COPY TO: N OWNER ❑ ARCHITECT ❑ ENGINEER ❑ CONSULTANT N _MSTU Committee_ PROJECT: Immokalee MSTU - PO# 4500116856 REPORT NUMBER: 26 CONTRACTOR: CLM JRL COMM No: 9003 Date: 10/27 11/3 & Weather: Partly Cloudy Estimate % Complete: N/A 11/7/2010 Time: 12:30 - 2:30 Temp Range: 83 Schedule Conformance: As scheduled PRESENT: Nov 11: Jim from Commercial Maintenance, Darryl and Pam from Collier County & Richard Tndell Oct 27 & Nov 7: Richard Tndell, solo WORK IN PROGRESS: Contractor crew present during Nov 3 visit OBSERVATIONS: Site is looking good, Little trash observed. Routine maintenance work has been performed. REVIEWS: County and FDOT Standards. Maintenance agreement, previous suggestions and work orders REPORT: Reviewed last report, over all conditions and status of work orders and direction from County with Pam, Darryl and Jim. Attended PAC meeting for Pathways grants - report forwarded. Two projects have progressed to next phase Light pole trimming concept image and map was sent to 8 vendors with 4 quotes received. Staff issued a purchase order as directed. Routine maintenance work has been performed and trash removed. The only overfull trash container continues to be observed on the East side of Main Street about a block north of first by the outdoor restaurant, The MSTU areas of responsibility are continuing to look very good. Review of water usage and controllers show the system is working but October was on of the driest on record (a little less than 2/3 of normal rainfall) with explains the conditions noted last month and underscores the need to bring Immokalee online with the County automated system. Die back and decline in plumbago, thryallis and crown -of- thorns observed. Treat or replace. Nutrient deficiency seems better however 1611`: IRIA o E S 1 U N LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 51^ AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239 -261 -4007 most crown of thorns are yellowed out indicating a lack of iron and nitrogen All planting areas continue to need to be trimmed to meet County and FDOT standards, especially within site triangles. Bougainvilla sprouts and low hanging tree branches require immediate attention. The required clear view zone is between 24" and 72 ", FDOT also requires 14'6" clear over traffic areas and 10' clear over sidewalks. Renovation planting plans for the medians on Main and First were reviewed, adjusted and forwarded to Commercial for pricing. Some weeds continue to be a problem through out. The broken bollard on Main near 51h has not been repaired or replaced. This was reported last May. Banner missing on first. Foxtail palms continue to decline. Many have low hanging seed pods which should be removed. Photos 1 Proposed garland 2 Immokalee 8 mile sign 3 Current median conditions 4 Foxtail seed pods 5 Dieback and severe cut back in bougainvillea 6 Dieback in plumbago 7 Dieback in Crown -of -Thorn 8 Crape myrtle seasonal change- bubblers to be added ACTION REQUIRED: Request more direction from County and MSTU Board. Suggest irrigation water use study Reported by: Richard Tindell, asla, registered landscape architect LA767 " i K w s+ + 4 s N 1 RF Olijlrrw�r , .+S °+ a 111 d 1 � rV� ' �'. "� - A Air— el. ir + !1 a I lk" y 1 i .. 1 O N LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 51^ AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239 - 261 -4007 landscape architect's 16 1 1 A$ O rFc0pop� 4 COPY TO: ® OWNER ❑ ARCHITECT ❑ ENGINEER ❑ CONSULTANT ® MSTU Committee Pathways Advisory Committee meeting The Collier County Pathways Advisory Committee met at the Development Services Center at 9 AM until noon on Friday, October 29, 2010. A number of topics were discussed including the 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan and proposed service changes to the Collier County Transit (CAT) as well as the selection of pathway projects to move forward for further evaluation. The long -range transportation plan projects the population of Collier County to exceed 500,000 people by 2035. This is about 90,000 people less than was anticipated in the plan five years ago and changes the needs for Highway expansion and renovations. The Collier County transit changes include modifications to bring better and more convenient service to the citizens of Golden gate /Immokalee without an increase in costs. Part of the proposed changes allows more direct connection to various parts of the community without requiring transfers at the government center. An additional bus stop will be located at 2050 Commerce Ave. to allow Immokalee passengers access to a variety of human services. Further descriptions are attached. These changes are scheduled to go into effect January 4, 2011. At its last meeting the committee received a number of project concepts for inclusion to its master list of Pathway / Sidewalk Grant Funding projects. The Committee determined it would add seven projects to the list; one from Everglades City, one from Marco Island, one from the city of Naples and four from unincorporated Collier County. Six projects were selected from the County for further study with four of them to be added to the list of future work. The factors included in the consideration were needed, $100,000 minimum estimated cost, less than 50% of the cost related to drainage, sufficient room for the improvement was present between the edge of road and the ROW and the adjacent road was on public (not private) land, Staff determined that in the Golden Gate submittal only project #2 -the South side of Coronado Parkway from Santa Barbara Blvd. to Golden Gate Parkway met the requirements for this grant funding project and was included in the six project shortlist. Immokalee had four projects short listed they include project #7 the West side of Carson Road from Westclox Road to Lake Trafford Road, project #9, the East side of FRL 1611 A$ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 51^ AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239 - 261 -4007 Carson Road from Lake Trafford Road to Immokalee Drive., projects #19 and #20 both sides of Immokalee Drive from Ninth Street N. to Carson Road. After the vote was taken there was a concern voiced from the audience about number 20 on the Immokalee list noting a difference in the length of the road listed on each side of the street. I offered to check the numbers and indeed number 19 is half of the actual length. I have requested right -of -way information from records division and will photograph the right -of -way edges along Immokalee Dr. during my next visit. Respectfully submitted Richard Tindell, asla Registered Landscape Architect LA767 1611k A8 IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.38,,.'V. U S(NJ%JPT1ffi RY COMMITTEE Henning Coyle LU 1ui anuar. 26, 2011 Gotstte BY ........................ AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance Ill. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes A. October 27, 2010 B. November 17, 2010 V. Code Enforcement Report - Weldon Walker VI. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard VII. Transportation Maintenance Report - CLM VIII. Landscape Architect Report- JRL Design IX. Community Redevelopment Agency X. Old Business XI. New Business XII. Public Comment XIII. Adjournment The next meeting is February 23, 2011 at 4:30 p.m. One Stop Career Center 750 South 5th Street Immokalee, FL 34142 0 Mist. Cones: Dale: Item R: 16 I 1 pb A IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMITTEE March 24, 2010 Minutes The meeting was called to order by Cherryle Thomas at 4:30 p.m. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: William Deyo, Cherryle Thomas, Lucy Ortiz, Andrea Halman (Excused), Carrie Williams County: Darryl Richard— Project Manger, Tessie Sillery— Operations Coordinator, Caroline Soto — Budget Analyst Others: Richard Tindell —JRL, Jim Fritchey —CLM, Bradley Muckel— Immokalee CRA, Penny Phillippi — Immokalee CRA, Fred Thomas — Immokalee CRA, Larry Wilcoxson— Candidate Florida House of Representatives, Darlene Lafferty—Kelly Services III. Approval of Agenda Lucy Ortiz moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Second by William Deyo. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes: February 24, 2010 Change: ll. Lucy Ortiz was excused William Deyo moved to approve the February 24, 2010 minutes as submitted. Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget — Caroline Soto reviewed the following Budget items: (See attachments) • Uncollected Ad Valorem Tax $84,919.48 • Available Operating Expense $2,325.13 • Operating Expense Budget Amendment is needed William Deyo moved to transfer $40,000.00 from Improvements General to Operating Expense. Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. 1611 � A 8 B. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard Darryl Richard stated Fund 111 Budget Report was distributed and noted sufficient funds are available through October 1, 2010 for all Fund 111 activity. (See attached.) He gave the following additional information on the Project Manger Report: (See attached) (IMM -19) 1s Street Intgation/Landscape and (IMM -18) Hwy 29 Irrioationkandscape o Recommended combining the Projects for Bidding purposes (IMM -16) Miles Ahead Sian • Installation of (6) signs is underway by Traffic Operations • A map of the sign locations will be provided at the April 28, 2010 meeting Darryl Richard presented quotes for the 1s` Street and 9th Street Irrigation Projects: • AG TRONIX- $16,612.15 (Materials for the control system) • EB SIMMONDS- $10,505.60 to monitor water usage and flow (Materials and Labor for Irrigation Antenna Tower) - The Antenna will be located in the ROW (by Sherriff's office at 1st Street and Main Street) • The existing Rain Shutoff device will be upgraded - The Rain Shutoff is incorporated into Bid documents for Bid Solicitation After much discussion it was deemed as proactive to preorder Materials for the Irrigation Projects. Additionally a potential cost increase (Materials) would be avoided. William Deyo moved to approve the Bid from AG TRON/X for $16,612.15 and the Bid by E.B. Simmonds for $10,505.60. Second by Carrie Williams. Motion carried unanimously 40. Darryl Richard reviewed Electrician quote ($14,550.00) for repairs. He recommended ordering spare Light Poles for FY2011 as County storage is available (CAT facility.) After discussion the Committee was in agreement to remove the accent lighting at 15t and 29'" (on Main Street) as it was perceived they will be damaged in the near future based on statistics. Carrie Williams moved to direct Staff to order spare Poles, (1) short and (2) tall, and to remove 1 short pole at 29th and 1st Street. Second by William Deyo. Motion carried unanimously 40. Penny Phillippi reviewed Banner Photos noting each Banner will have different scene. She requested approval of the Banner concept. 161,1A The Committee requested different images for photo(s) 2, 5, and 8 (See attached) William Deyo moved to approve the concept of the Banners and put out for Bid, but change a couple of the images. Second by Carrie Williams. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. C. FY- 2011 Budget Darryl Richard reviewed the proposed Budget and the following changes were made: Rent Building • Forecast 10— Decreased to 0 • Current 11— Decreased to 0 Legal ADV • Forecast 10— Increased to $300.00 • Current 11— Increased to $300.00 Other Operating Supplies • Forecast 10— Increased to $3,000.00 • Current 11 — Increased to $5,000.00 Cherryle Thomas questioned when the revenue from the Boundary Expansion will be reflected in the Budget. Darryl Richard replied the Boundary Expansion monies will be in FY11 Budget. Staff will confer with Mark Isackson to include Boundary Expansion monies in the FY11 Budget. Lucy Ortiz moved to approve the proposed Budget as amended and set aside 5% for Reserves and the remaining portions in Capital Outlay. Second by William Deyo. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. VI. Transportation Maintenance Report-CLM Jim Fritchey reported: • Conducting General Maintenance • Street Sweeping ongoing • Fertilization is scheduled in April Cherryle Thomas questioned the frequency on trash removal as it was perceived as insufficient. Staff will request Jim Wheatley - Immokalee Waste attend the April meeting. VII. Landscape Architect Report-JRL Design Richard Tindell reviewed report #9003: (See attached) • Trimming and replacement of dead Plant Material is scheduled (CLM) • Fertilization is scheduled (CLM) • Electrical box has been removed ( by the Airport) • Plant Pallet suggestions (along 15t and 29th) will be presented at the April meeting 16 11, 1 A8 VIII. Community Redevelopment Agency Brad Muckel reported the Immokalee High School art contest (for the Edgerrin James Sign) will not occur until fall as the current calendar year curriculum cannot be modified. Penny Phillippe reported the following approvals were received: • Purchase of 9" Street parcel (9"' Street Plaza Project) - by the BCC • CRA Public Realm Plan -by the BCC • Interim Land Development Code -by the Planning Commission Additionally Penny Phillippe stated changes were made to the Fagade Grant. IX. Code Enforcement Report - Weldon Walker -None X. Old Business A. Storm Water Penny Phillippe announced Florida Department of Community Affairs perceives Funding ($3,500,000.00) is available for implementation of the Storm Water Master Plan. XI. New Business -None XII. Public Comment There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:55 PM. Immokalee Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee Cherryle %omas, Chairman These minutes approved by the Committee on `1 z as presented or amended The next meeting is April 28, 2010 at 4:30 p.m. One Stop Career Center 750 South 5"' Street Immokalee, FL 34142 4 16 1 �1 �IWb: C,x � A G �gz�zg1�� y�� HOW r Nh J 0 ,p rtn 1paw ma N 0000r wt O 00000 O< O 00000 Of 0 00000 0; O O O O N N N N J 00 O W a Ot Ot N O O O O r W W W p 00000 00 c p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00 0 r r t• r W4 J rN rm Na J yr TJNV)u � Nr ,>mrmc v) pIN NJtOND W W N b W U N l 0 J m rmNOc Nm cc r J W N W l0 iP A p WW JOUO�� to J� 'Wool m A r w N N n N toNOtnatn t+lc V) 000ONOJ- �O 000O4IOWt Ip p000N0 J• tp OOOO�IOMt 1 � � N r r O pN JO OD O � pp VIN J µ0i Rm Wr m „ rt m �yy W rtm K O 1np 3 9 y _ t ly Ori Fr' � W r O r a o on O K r W � w m R ft O 7 m rt n O O wr .A Hgy rp rr N ,I n M W o � PC jPDj to GVia w mq w o�• m o �. a N M �q OE O C7 a a� m - m d OO rt O rt p�7 Z NY-W tj H.5 rt pmm rtro O O N rm o W N to 0 r y o m 161 1A8 Report Date: April 28, 2010 Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Tessie Sillery, Operations Coordinator, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Immokalee MSTU Project Status (IMM -20) — ACTIVE- Hwy 29 Cross -Walk Project 04- 28 -10: Project Scope is under review. Modification to Project Scope' has been requested. (IMM -19) — ACTIVE- 1'` Street Irrigation/Landscape: Refurbishment Project 9- 23 -09: Contract/Work Order is being processed anticipate Notice to Proceed after Oct. 1s' 10- 12 -09: Notice to Proceed for PO 4500111227; JRL IRG DESIGN 1ST ST. 02- 24 -10: JRL 60% submittal is under review 03- 22 -10: NTP for Landscape Design Work Order 04- 28 -10: Irrigation Plans are under review by Staff (IMM -18) — ACTIVE- Hwy 29 Irrigation/Landscape: Refurbishment Project 9- 23 -09: JRL submittal of concept draft' design complete; Contract/Work Order is being processed anticipate Notice to Proceed after Oct. I' 10- 12 -09: Notice to Proceed PO 4500111225 JRL IRG DESIGN MAIN ST 02- 24 -10: JRL 100% submittal is under review by staff 03- 22 -10: NTP for Landscape Design Work Order 04- 28 -10: Irrigation Plans are under review by Staff (IMM -17) — ACTIVE - " Edgerrin James Sign" ;Request for Sign indicating "Welcome to Immokalee home of Edgerrin James" for motorist who are traveling to Immokalee 9- 23 -09: CRA to install `sign' and MSTU is to provide for landscaping or amenities around sign (could include lighting) 02- 24 -10: CRA to report on status of `High - school Children' producing sign concepts. (per suggestion made at 01 -27 -10 meeting) (IMM -16) — ACTIVE - "Miles ahead" Sign; Request for Sign indicating "Miles ahead" to Immokalee for motorist who are traveling to Immokalee 02- 24 -10: Traffic Operations will installing quantity 6 miles ahead signs for Immokalee (IMM -15) — ACTIVE- ONGOING —LA Maintenance Consulting; Work Order for JRL; Landscape Architectural Services 02- 24 -10: Ongoing Services from JRL Design; new proposal for new annual contract. (IMM -11) — ACTIVE - ONGOING — Roadway Maintenance: BID #06 -4008 -- expires: March 10, 2010 "Immokalee Beautification M.S.T.U. /M.S.T.D. Roadway Grounds Maintenance"; Commercial Land Maintenance Contract 02- 24 -10: Ongoing Services from Commercial Land Maintenance 03- 01 -10: NTP Issued under new Contract #09 -5264, "Immokalee Road MSTU/MSTD Landscape Maintenance" : , M 71 . 1 S`nl P7 — 7[e32. Name otRepresentahre I'M Sipatare oI Kepresevr} "`- Date of Quota: --tG --'—' 1611 IA8 Task Item Descrh►doa Qty. Unit Unit Cost Total 90 Fw s :z? �, imye for eaeh beaver wig vary; g" was be determined by the Vender is to qa�'� � 6esed oa this varieble- �� . j 5ff1Tf pp 147' L�r-pSGMv fit,• suderatevdh the gsote request sent Gad ftMMLAR� 'r Mstafstteror on 4.19 ear*er (or hle tD lamb" ler �.0 1lsaaere nod, abide M my a s•1v=* b nl.to to the Ik qua for QMN for tbb Oro1ML 13h teeteeteat a nd be tiped prher m the aewWea of 9� b&wd m ehU raleest- �,y. ti N t..r s printed Name with Tide= Responder is to mad:, fix, or cesail quote to: Darryl Iti&ard, Project Manager, Collier County, Department of Alternative TrawsPoruden Modes 2885 Horeahoe Drive South, Naples, Florida 34164 plesam (239) 252-5775 Fax 239,252.6219 CAB: 2396-253-9M d - .tJa...Y.�nnllier'gOV.Qet. Form. NoQ- IlesPo ndmts are requested submit attached `No Quote 16 VI A8 04 /27/2010 13:84 FAX 9187326528 CARROT TOP a 001 1. ,r Tat I ,tij.r , 3�_ �+ L LPG � es irsr.- ReprmwxMdvs DrbofQ�s: Tsrk Itme Deser$etbm Qb• Usk Usk Cat TOW asomw 90 EA xorn Zma gHeebpmmr WN tti.•..eb bua w wm vap od w19 be debwmdMd b7 the LeoabawMiriv/CaA4 Voaieri s•�.r..ateatbasd..Ibie�srisbin a 419.10 r lo se aeespom sloged:_ Sill . , - PAsied mm" "M Tltla pespeedler S to MWL fis+er e B gaob tb: do Vale sm Tb i aMswnrt.at be>dpW pr%r MMW. COMW Coamyt, A*seUmM of Akw tstive 2M Sawdae Ddrs amdk NapMs, Florlds 34104 TdepissK (239) 20-SM Fm X04=4319 CdL- 2"45341M a osb we rogmoo0 0+bob mgmebod `No QSSW FOre. 04/27/2010 13:54 PAX 9197325526 CARROT TOP rtl�TN�yevA�µw+ y,m„g,p�I.n•D11NM . .. .. ... Csua.m•Mrwi a4N b: COLLIERCOUNTY 2386 HORSESHOE DR S 33 NAPL,FL34104US 1611 -ship b: COLLIER Op OE DR S NAPLES, Fl. 34104US A8 IM 003 TgT ORDER THE TOTAL QUANTITY LISTED TO GET THIS PRICE USING SAME ARTWORK IN 00 RECT F~ ARTWORK FOR ALL BAND _ CUSTOM DIGITAL VINYL BANNER BBnw Shop!: Vertical Finishing: PC" Sbeve (TOP&B) w Grommets Cw0maition : Double-Wed 15 OL'VINIYL. 24"X01" .DIGITAL BACKGROI DELIVERY T1ME 13 3WKS AFTER LAYOUT THE SAME DESIGN. SET UP- VGITAL VINYL BANNER DKBTAL W 11P CHARM 1X1 6,105.70 D W10"TAL I PRINT. cUr%K r pROVAL THI PRICING IS F R ALL 1 75.00 76.00 Subtotal 5,261.70 Freight S 94.00 Tax 0.00 Tatid 55,355.70 yanks end tkma aPDrOO�If' rood by Gun 8 BradsUaat may be billed at 1% • 10, net G&AMMO+W bo". veMrarra ct W"M ob°r or cma owd 30. Ofrorv�" w@ vA a, - your Thank you for the opporhmw to 4r� for Y" Cry 1 leek tbrv+erd b ramga0n0 order m yen a•lMfeel Sinaerehl. mwi Clonvi-Top InthmMias, Ino. �Ix .2 To accept quotation for $5•3555.70, sign hero and retam Papa t *fl QUOTE 0,M : 300007213 ovalp,rwrNuffow: 619079 PONUMber. M91y Sokffpww: Oeb : y27/2010 oo: Va atl b 6!20/2010 -ship b: COLLIER Op OE DR S NAPLES, Fl. 34104US A8 IM 003 TgT ORDER THE TOTAL QUANTITY LISTED TO GET THIS PRICE USING SAME ARTWORK IN 00 RECT F~ ARTWORK FOR ALL BAND _ CUSTOM DIGITAL VINYL BANNER BBnw Shop!: Vertical Finishing: PC" Sbeve (TOP&B) w Grommets Cw0maition : Double-Wed 15 OL'VINIYL. 24"X01" .DIGITAL BACKGROI DELIVERY T1ME 13 3WKS AFTER LAYOUT THE SAME DESIGN. SET UP- VGITAL VINYL BANNER DKBTAL W 11P CHARM 1X1 6,105.70 D W10"TAL I PRINT. cUr%K r pROVAL THI PRICING IS F R ALL 1 75.00 76.00 Subtotal 5,261.70 Freight S 94.00 Tax 0.00 Tatid 55,355.70 yanks end tkma aPDrOO�If' rood by Gun 8 BradsUaat may be billed at 1% • 10, net G&AMMO+W bo". veMrarra ct W"M ob°r or cma owd 30. Ofrorv�" w@ vA a, - your Thank you for the opporhmw to 4r� for Y" Cry 1 leek tbrv+erd b ramga0n0 order m yen a•lMfeel Sinaerehl. mwi Clonvi-Top InthmMias, Ino. �Ix .2 To accept quotation for $5•3555.70, sign hero and retam Papa t *fl 04/27/2010 13:56 PAZ 8197325526 CARROT TOP CiffoTTop ffNX1STnESM Coos Aaonba: e�,1ns>Ira•".e�.maar, Cum: mWAU lAaaaW••—'ww+F— PoNunWr: rve,sl.Imalr•awaaenaeus . cu.as.r"erw Deft Quoted.' ted . Datr Quoted : v uda: COLDER COUNTY 2866 HORSESHOE DR S NAPLES, FL 341114 US 161 1 A8 Z002 QUOTE SODGM12 819079 —$* b: COLLIER COUNTY 2685 HORSESHOE OR 8 NAPLES. FL 34104 US ARTYVOW IN CORRECT FORMAT. 7AF078CUS•0668i3 CUSTOM DIGITAL VINYL BANNER Banner Shape! VsftW Finishing: Pala ftm (TOP&S) w Grommets Coneh'uction : Double -Sided 15 OZ VINYL. 24°X61' .DIGITAL BACKGROI DELIVERY TIME IS 31NK5 AFTER LAYOUT THE SAME DESIGN. AF6798ET SET UP- DIGITAL VINYL BANNER D141*17AL ti6T UP CHARGE M6y 427/2010 5/2&2010 11 171-001 171.00 WJOIGJTAL IIFPPJNT. GUKK K 1 ROYAL THISI PRICING IS F R ALL 1 1 75.001 76.00 GovaFraw al boaa9, volene a WWAMOM, banks and Ikma appnloMay reW by Dun 6 Sr4d*"t may be billed at 1% -10, rat 30. Olho 18e, we will aooept your advance cheak, 10 OY elder ar grads acrd Thank you far Bro appedWtY to qua%for Your blrklaad 1 look foroWd b OMPIlding tNS order b Your eabdoctim sincerely, L41HY Carol -Tap mduakies, Inc. millyooano> Wew aom To accept quotation for 05&006 sign Mere and return ft"1 oft Subtotal 246.00 Freight $ 9.00 Tax 0.00 Told $766.00 GovaFraw al boaa9, volene a WWAMOM, banks and Ikma appnloMay reW by Dun 6 Sr4d*"t may be billed at 1% -10, rat 30. Olho 18e, we will aooept your advance cheak, 10 OY elder ar grads acrd Thank you far Bro appedWtY to qua%for Your blrklaad 1 look foroWd b OMPIlding tNS order b Your eabdoctim sincerely, L41HY Carol -Tap mduakies, Inc. millyooano> Wew aom To accept quotation for 05&006 sign Mere and return ft"1 oft 04/27/2010 08:51 2395913940 LYKI i A8 � S I P4 01!01 Cosnpaoy: � /NS r � Aedrtsa: tanail: / native Providing Quote! Name of DePre1ta' $ipstore Of I(�rpealru�c. Date of TaakItem Description Qty. Unit Unit Coat Total OD MUL.— 90 EA s /4d -Z— s_ D, Banner Note Z..ei 'B.ekVo und' lMW for seer banner wu vary; sad wM be determistd by tut immokelse MSTU CgAt Vendor is to gaoen snit east based sa tkis variabl& named bsbw ■sderalaMds the gaott Meant xnt IKaaahebrar (or Mmta�ar's "O tad wlq abfda k7 any Msamhcttirer on 4i9-)a b reiatba b 7rnmoketee MB r QUO" f rt "% pateMent must be slgaed prior req.b eats at sbted 1" aka sa tuts Mgaat. this ptoieet tia tits aatptta� f as 4"A ei�sed: x'7"0 printed Name with Tile: Responder is to mail, lax, or email quote to: Darryl Rlekard, pro jeet MaoW, Collier County, Department of Alternative Transportation Modes 2885 liorstMIM Drive South, Naples, Florida 34104 Telepbow: (n9) 2M,5775 Fa:: 239 -25i -6219 Cell: 239- 253 -9003 Non- RaePontkmb are ragmeatcd subtait attaeked'No Qiate' Form. ab 4z 1611 wt r 4 4 16 it 1 A8 I 3 C 2 O q' � N � O � C N tt W P♦ O w O Y O N t W N+ V S V W N R fJ 0 m V W N O 10 w V W O A N N+ H O A m A m m C W C 1 O- yy 'O S 0 y 0 0 -i r m r f1 T m r; Z C m T Z� m ti yy O 0 1 Z G m Z m Z -1 O y Z m O y O> ti A- - T _ O r O A ti r N W ,mU W O 4mm� m 4l m p� O m D S .Zmi S A r m fZ/1 Z _I 1= 2 r .T J ZzC C Z m= V1 m Q 2 m G) Z f�l y T G1 u 2e A A v I y T (p T Z m .11 RI m -1 DO D O O < T m y y T m m -_i y O m 2 iii Cl r m O -I ;1.7_11 A m O O m m C m C O m y m T A ,_yI -I N O O S m Z Gl m n m N D D 3 m ;Cu O m f� 0 O 2 0 .._I 2 2 m N 1 z a T T y~ m=<< y 0 0 O D Z Z -'. r Z �m11 D m 'T ZZ0 v D D Z :::::p000UUp y 2 .0 :Q11 .perQ .71 O S fOn -1 .701 0 Z M f0 C D 1 N ti r rr -i W v 0 -Z1 y M Z foil D ,x-11 D -i m T m T m C m-- 0 Ci y�cy' A yr2D .71 n 0 f% 3 3 IATI N -1 Z m z0 Z D m z mZ 3 m�1 G) m f7 m m m O O 5 iD5� S P° -g O m T ?~ O 0 Z f m f0 m O i m D D r Cy; �ZpZi{11 C Z f011 "' .71 m Al m jZ+ 0 Or m O 1 C co 2 m m m m X m m m A T O 9 fC0 f�/1 Z O f0 r1 Z fO m '� m C ti~ O N 0 O ti m Z < m i O Z m g O O O v m M N N M H H M N N H N H N b H H H N H b H H H H b H M N N N N M H N N H H N N pp Y pp�� pW� ��pp W N app 1D q O N ' G� m� >n fpt R 1Q6 � �w m t0 O O OQ V N W O W 10 dQ+ NN�** W 0 Q ��l+ gOg Q gg QQO $A N M N N M N N H M M N H b M N N M N N M b N 3�g n a ? u g Q m V Io w p N H M H N M H M M N M M M N N N H N H H H H N N M N N N N M N N M H H M b H 6 g t4 N ci 6 - tg N V ' w (T lmJ O O, 1 N ad A 1 N S S A S O+ m 1 O) W fOT A O Ol N M H N H N M N N N M N M N N N N M M N M N N N N M N N N N N N N M H M M M N O O N O N N O {m0� fpN� mp pN� N U ppW jh. A W qyO W e O fmif N +O �Op M 100 �Vp A> f� tlf S O O SW O 8 O 8+ O (� O O (ITT 0� ® SO O �Off �1 app fJ S 41 O mN A> N N N N N Op O O O W N N N O V • OOi N P m S S O O O O O O 1 O R w+ S N S O O O N W f0T A O y A 3 C 2 O q' � N � O � C J V N W N J 161 s As ai i N 1 O 01 i -i fo fn m� g Z r" 7C C- e C- C• c. C- ` C- 3 3 3 m m m m n n 0 D s c c 0 ��jo_ w w w rrrrrrrc A w a 3 3 0 o 0 �3 0 0 0 c � q 4D 0 i'o 3 3 m0a22 =D� �, w w t0 m Ovvvvu� 70C �c wo tn3 3 3 7 C C C .wi w. 7 R° O- 0 ---- N N N W T. fo' 0 N w N w 0 0 W ID 0 �' 3 to to El -- ra El °w 0 � m o 3 3 rA m N o n > > > > > > > G7 w o of ci Di a M w 7= w w w w CD 'cn w ^' D O y o w o r r r � 0 m ma O.G m ° — 3 t°n w r m o m w m w c„{ w ca x w obi obi .5., O O C) .O. .�. A A A A A A 4 A A A A A A A A A .? A A A A A ?. -N A A 0f fpm CT m CA 01 01 CT 01 0 CT 01 01 01 0 01 01 0 01 EL 0 0 m 01 07 01 W O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O J J J Z Z J J ! J J J J J J J J J J! J�� Li !! J J! D D N J J J n �% V O 0 N 0 W N 0 0 V 0 V1 J O 0 0? 0p� 0 V A N N% W N T O N W 0 w 0 N N 0 A W w W O V N O A W � 00 W 0 O J V 0 A W L" T ? N N t0 0 0 V O N O 0 W c0 O O - V J f0 N" V N t0 0 O 0 W 0 V M co O N O O 0 O W V O 0000 r 0— 0 0 o o 8 g ? o 0 zzzZZ" ��AL �zz`O w � � °, °ODOD$OD°D <n cn ° M 0 (A 0 zzzzz � � w z(OzzztI � cn , � � cn O D D D D D W D D CMI 8 8 8 8 8 8 5- D D D D D D N D D D W V (�i J O -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N L" O J � a loco- 1 -1 rcoat�popr -;Dcp�p r- r- rrrrr� 0 - 1�gO- ic_ocp -v � w 0 w O c O w w 0 0 0 7 7 7 � 7 O w° w w w G g 1 1 w ww C 0= S w -• w w ,7 r j w to s w N w. S S w zz 0 0 � N w N nw � d v � o v n Cl) co O (o co 3 6910 � �' � `� M. F. (0D 0 0 � 0 =wow w o m w w 3 n N CD Cl) S Z (a w d�w0 �Z.CD �' 2 A c �,�sS�sSzr 7t r, � tntn� w w w -� aw 0 w w O t� N m N N fD 2, 3 3 O N N q f�Y 3 w io w w C c C c C a 0 zp"° N fA �C) N w m y y N w d fla l N -d O w w o m cnmcnmmt�m ° O O0 .C.. w ` 00 2_ �_ 2_ 2 2_ w N ~ 3 3 (�� (2_� N fD w fD w w w w 0 w w G) I < fA EA fA Hi H1 fA <A fA EA fA EA fA 1.9 fA fA fA EA fA fA fA fA EA {fl Hi fA fA EA fA ifl Go EA <A n 0) N N J J! w 0t co CD 01 N V N 5�1 w V 0 S A N Co N -+ A A N pppp N A V 0 <0 N ! 0 p, = 0 0 0" CA) W V (0 CI CJ 0 0 V 0 A A O A N V 0 N 0 w O O O. CO O . . CO CO W 0 0 W -+ N V n 0 0 0 0 01 co c0 0 O O p O m N A 0 p V O 0 O O 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O co A O V Cn N - 4 0 O 1 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ai i N 1 O 01 i IRL 161 IF 0-6 8 1 0 N � ♦( LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN V 405 51h AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 ` NAPLES, FLORIDA 239 - 261 -4007 I�nds�pe c architect's I I I I I I I lill I I I I I I Iii 1report COPY TO: ® OWNER ❑ ARCHITECT ❑ ENGINEER ❑ CONSULTANT ® _MSTU Committee_ PROJECT: Immokalee MSTU - PO# 4500116856 REPORT NUMBER: 20 CONTRACTOR: CLM JRL COMM No: 9003 Date: 3124/10 & Weather: Cloudly Estimate %Complete: WA 4/21/10 Time: 11:30-1:30 Temp Range: 78 Schedule Conformance: As scheduled PRESENT: Commercial Maintenance & Richard Tindell (both) WORK IN PROGRESS Contractor present during site visit OBSERVATIONS: Site is looking good, Routine maintenance work has been performed REVIEWS: Maintenance agreement REPORT: Pre MSTU meeting inspection was routine. Questions were raised about status of expanded work area. Other than mowing, routine maintenance work has been performed and trash removed. Many reported problems are yet to be addressed Several plantings have recovered from the cold weather this winter (see images 1 -4) Some have recovered too well and the Spring flush is blocking sight views and need to be trimmed back or removed. (see image 5) The Immokalee sign on 26 still is missing juniper and is devoid of color, perhaps some geraniums could be planted to give color until a new palette is approved (see image 6) Bougainville and crown of thorns, especially along 1 n still need to have damage trimmed back to new growth and dead ones removed - Need Board and County direction about replacements (see image 7& 8) Dead foxtail palms are yet to be removed. This has been reported for months and do nothing to reinforce "pride in place" for the citizens of Immokalee (see images 9 - 12) v IRL c s I a« LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 5m AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239 -261 -4007 1611 A8 Another long standing problem is the trip hazards crossing the median on Main Street in town. The height of the curbs where they met the planting soil can cause tripping while crossing this busy road, especially for children. Other objects such as irrigation pipes and equipment boxes are also a problem. Note the lack of mulch along Main (see images 13 -15) The FDOT safety cones, while aesthetically unpleasing, are making a difference. Several show signs of interaction with vehicles (cuts, scrapes and tire marks). See image 16 The mains Street and First Street corridors continue to improve. They continue to be neater and cleaner. Curb side planters continue to be a problem as does sidewalk cleaning. ACTION REQUIRED: Request more direction from County and MSTU Board. Reported by: Richard Tindell, asla, registered landscape architect LA767 / < I, /kF; \ . � . .. ` 'q\ � \: tA.2 � 2� r p +: her j _ r k ,v w M y F t ot'�.. w i F A <. " 1 i A -AN N a v k og O N F m Y E v C a ri 1 N g N F N N N Y O 16 Ii 1 A8 I N n 1 N O COO O N F N N Y O v N n v O N H N N (0 Y O E 16 11 p$ Preliminary Median Plant List - Immokalee GROUNDCOVERS & SHRUBS Acrostichum daneifolia Leather fern yes Ficus microcarpa Ilex cornuta Ilex vomitoria "Schellings Dwarf" Dwarf yaupon holly yes Indian Hawthorne Jasmine Juniper Lantana Linope Plumbago Serenoa repens Saw palmetto yes Vibrnum PALMS Dwarf Date Palm Sabal palmetto Cabbage palm yes Serenoa repens Saw palmetto yes TREES Ilex attenuata East Palatka holly yes Ilex vomitoria Yaupon holly yes Indian Hawthorne Ligustrim Magnolia Myrica cerifera Wax myrtle yes Oak Pinus eiliottii denea Southern slash pine yes White Geiger IRIJ 0-K a a l N LANDSCAPEARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 51^ AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES. FLORIDA 239 - 261 -4007 16111 A8 I�ndscape arcit ect's fi h eld report, COPY TO: ® OWNER I] ARCHITECT ❑ ENGINEER ❑ CONSULTANT ® _MSTU Committee_ PROJECT: Immokalee MSTU - PO# 4500116856 III REPORT NUMBER: 19 CONTRACTOR: LINK JRL COMM No: 9003 Date: 4/812010 Weather: Scattered Estimate % Complete: N/A Clouds Time: 10:30 — noon Temp Range: 73 Schedule Conformance: N/a PRESENT: Richard Tindell WORK IN PROGRESS: Immokalee N/A — Review of temp effects on plantings OBSERVATIONS: Site is looking good, Most material in Ava Maria medians did well REVIEWS: County Planting Guidelines REPORT: Photo 1 - Native lantana use as mass color along streets and in medians / roundabouts Photo 2 - Juniper, vibrunum s. and lantans with cypress mulch Photo 3 - White Geiger, Jasmine, Ruellia Photo 4 - Sabot Palms, Plumbago, Jasmine, Dwarf Ilex and Indian Hawthorn as flowering trees Photo 5 - Oaks, Magnolia, Dwarf Ilex and Ilex cornuta Photo 6 - Queen Palms, Oaks, Ligustrum Trees and Society Garlic Photo 7 - Dwarf Date Palm, jasmine and yellow lantana Photo 8 - Sidewalk cleaning stream cleaner w brushes in Ava Maria ACTION REQUIRED: Request more direction from County and MSTU Board. Reported by: Richard Tindell, asla, registered landscape architect LA767 x'. t.' : r � � r c, r, 1 `Y �n r, 9 rl � M i � rb. �i y. � FI e 1 l r Y? rk La wn 1 wi � IS I sf� }. a 4 a R" S i � rb. �i y. � FI e 1 l r Y? 16 1 1 A 8 "MOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMITTEE September 22, 2010 Minutes The meeting was called to order by Cherryle Thomas at 4:44 p.m. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Cherryle Thomas, William Deyo, Lucy Ortiz, Andrea Halman (Excused), Carrie Williams (Excused) County: Darryl Richard - Project Manger Others: Jim Fritchey -CLM, Richard Tindell -JRL, Bradley Muckel -CRA, Christie Betancourt-CRA, Fred Thomas -CRA, Darlene Lafferty - Juristaff III. Approval of Agenda Add: Xl. A. Reappointment of Members William Deyo moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes: August 25, 2010 Change: Pg. 5, Vll, paragraph 3, should read: Chenyle Thomas relayed Public request to install a Light at the "I 1 rn" Street extension William Deyo moved to approve the August 25, 2010 minutes as submitted. Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. V. Code Enforcement - Weldon Walker -None VI. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report Darryl Richard reviewed the following Budget items: (See attached) • Uncollected Ad Valorem Tax $9,127.78 • Available Operating Expense $5,306.34 • Reserves for Contingency $10,200.00 will Carry Forward FY11 • Highlighted P.O.s will roll into FY11 (page 2) • FY11 Budget Report format will include the following changes - Work Order /Bid # column will be removed - P.O. Description will be expanded in the Open P.O. items .L0 G 1 A8 B. Project Manager Report-Darryl Richard reported: (See attached) (IMM -24) Christmas Lighting Proiect o TB &E Engineering Firm is preparing Wind load calculations (required by FDOT) (IMM -23) Banner Project • Received Banner Samples were '/2 - 1 inch shorter than the Banner model provided to the Manufacturer • Carrot Top will provide a new Banner Sample within 30 days for review and approval by County Staff • Staff resubmitted the prototype (Banner and measurements) to Carrot Top to manufacture the Sample (IMM -22) Cross -Walks & Sightline Study • RWA Survey data Final will include elevations • Survey is complete - Staff will present to FDOT for review (removal of the white Bollards) (IMM -20) First Street & Hwy 29 Survev o Survey is 90% Complete (IMM -19) Street Irrigation/Landscape Refurbishment Project • Irrigation plans are under review by Staff and JRL • Anticipates installation of the Irrigation Control System Components by EB Simmons after October 1st (IMM -17) Edgerrin James Sign o Staff suggested installing the Sign on private property Cherryle Thomas questioned the timeline for completion and approval on the Immokalee Master Plan as she perceived it would eliminate the need for County approval for the Sign (City of Naples.) Darryl Richard inquired if the CRA was requesting an LDC Amendment which may allow more flexibility (for Signage.) Brad Muckel responded: • An Interim LDC Amendment is in place • Amendment only permits a percentage (10 - 20 %) of deviation on the current LDC (Land Development Code) • Sign installation falls under State DOT guidelines Discussion ensued on the Welcome to Naples Sign posted on US41 highlighting Barron Collier (as State Champions.) Cherryle Thomas expressed dissatisfaction that Immokalee was forbid to install the Edgerrin James Sign(s) conversely Naples was permitted to honor Barron Collier (as State Champions.) 2 161 1 A8 Discussion continued on alternate Sign locations (Private Property) and the following suggestions were made: o (1) Sign on private property on Hwy 29 at the curve (by Handy Food Store) o (1) Sign at the corner of Stockade Rd. (Bureau of Indian Affairs) After much discussion the Committee requested to pursue installing the Signs at the original (ROW) locations requested. Additionally it was concluded Permits are required to install Signs: • On Private Property - In addition a Maintenance agreement is required with the State • In the ROW on - State Roads - County Roads (IMM -16) Miles ahead Sign o Signs were installed - (1) Oil Well Rd - (1) Camp Keais Rd - (4) additional sites are under review VII. Transportation Maintenance Report-CLM Jim Fritchey reported: • Tree and Palm trimming is complete • Backfill of Medians is underway - Subsequently Fertilization and Mulch installation will be performed VIII. Landscape Architect Report-JRL Design Richard Tindall reported the following: (See attached) o Dead Planter of Crown of Thorn (3rd and Main) o (4) Missing Banners - (2) on Main Street - (2) on 15t Street o Nitrogen Fertilizer will be applied to Crown of Thorn (in 4 weeks) Cemetery Proposed Improvements • Landscape Layout (See attached) - Install Plant Material parallel with Main Street - Install Plant Material along the back of lot - Install Vines on the Fence perimeter (sides) • Plant List (See attached) - Plant Material Cost Estimate $200.00 - $2,400.00 • Existing Irrigation can be utilized - Connect new Irrigation to existing Main Irrigation Estimate $800.00 - $1,000.00 161188 o Front Decorative Fence Estimate $2,000.00 - $2,400.00 o Chain Link Fence replacement Cost $10,000.00 (inside) - Suggested installing only the Front portion of the Decorative Fence to reduce cost on the Project William Deyo moved to direct Staff and JRL to move forward on Immokalee Mission Cemetery Landscape Improvement Project as the Committee approves the plans that were shown. Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. Richard Tindell announced a PAC (Pathways Advisory Committee) meeting is scheduled to review proposed work for Pathways and the Ballpark Budget. He reviewed a Preliminary Immokalee Pathway Project list and map. (See attached) Discussion ensued and the Committee agreed on the following: o Item #3 Westclox Street (South) is priority - Estimated cost was reviewed - $697,950.00 - Item #3 will be broken down in (4) Project Phases - Asphalt walkways are preferred in the rural areas Lucy Ortiz moved to proceed with Number 3 ( Westclox Street -South side) and to breakout the cost, the breakout cost will be presented to the PAC (Pathways Advisory Committee.) Second by William Deyo. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. IX. Community Redevelopment Agency Brad Muckel stated a Grant Proposal was submitted to FDOT for illuminated crosswalks on South 15t Street and Main. Darryl Richard will advise Brad Muckel of the scheduled meeting with FDOT on the Crosswalks. X. Old Business A. Water Symposium -None XI. New Business A. Reappointment of Members Darryl Richard reviewed applications submitted by Andrea Halman and William Deyo for reappointment. Lucy Ortiz moved to recommend (to the BCC) Andrea Halman and William Deyo be reappointed to the Committee. Second by Cherryie Thomas. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. XII. Public Comment -None 161 1 A8 Darryl Richard conveyed a Traffic Operations request that all Traffic Operations questions be directed to the Engineer via email or phone. They can be reached at 239 - 252 -8192. There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:54 PM. Immokalee Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee CjVJIA,� tom' Cherryle Tholyas, Chairman These minutes approved by the Committee on (() ) t U as presented_ ->�_or amended The next meeting is October 27, 2010 at 4:30 p.m. One Stop Career Center 750 South 5th Street Immokalee, FL 34142 16k1 Ab JRL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 5t^ AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239 -261 -4007 COPY TO: ® OWNER ❑ ARCHITECT ❑ ENGINEER ❑ CONSULTANT ® _MSTU Committee_ PROJECT: Immokalee MSTU - PO# 4500116856 REPORT NUMBER: 25 CONTRACTOR: CLM JRL COMM No: 9003 Date: 9/22,10/4, Weather: Partly Cloudy Estimate % Complete: N/A 10/20/2010 Time: 12:30 - 2:30 Temp Range: 86 Schedule Conformance: As scheduled PRESENT: September 22: Jim from Commercial Maintenance, Darryl and Pam from Collier County & Richard Tindell Oct 4 & Oct 20: Richard Tindell, solo WORK IN PROGRESS: Contractor crew present during Oct 22 visit OBSERVATIONS: Site is looking good, Little trash observed. Routine maintenance work has been performed. Few items noted in June report still remain unresolved REVIEWS: Maintenance agreement, previous suggestions and work orders REPORT: Pre MSTU meeting drive through inspection was not notable - mowing, site line trimming, fertilization, soil fill behind curbs and plant replacement were discussed as well as items that continue to not be addressed. Routine maintenance work has been performed and trash removed. The only overfull trash container was seen on the East side of Main Street about a block north of first by the outdoor restaurant, The MSTU areas of responsibility are continuing to look very good. Die back and decline in plumbago, thryallis and crown -of- thorns observed. Treat or replace. Crown -of- thorns have been removed or cut down on east side of Main Street at about 41h were reported in September and have not been replaced Some weeds continue to be a problem through out. The broken bollard on Main near 511' has not been repaired or replaced. This was reported last May. JRL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING DESIGN 405 51^ AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 239 -261 -4007 ACTION REQUIRED: Banner missing on first. Foxtail palms continue to decline. 1611 A8 Trimmings of Confederate Jasmine in median on first Street were left in the planting and should be removed. The current die back of plant material is probably the result of problems with the irrigation system rather than from the freezes of last winter. A review of water rate application would be beneficial. Photos 1 Missing and dead plants along Main Street with weeds 2 Damaged Bollards note weeds 3 Dieback in Ornamental Grasses 4 Dieback in Thryallis 5 Dieback and severe cut back in bougainvillea 6 Dieback in plumbago 7 Dieback in Crown -of -Thorn Request more direction from County and MSTU Board. Suggest irrigation water use study Reported by: Richard Tindell, asla, registered landscape architect LA767 a N N w m m a J N N E 6 N y H i c I c e n 0 n N O O O O O O O O h O O O 0 N O O m ¢ O 0 O 0 w N O NN . O N O O c0 0 10 W N O M m m O M. d O d O W Cn M 10 0 O O u(O l td h h M N OI w w w w m w C a o 0 o e o 0 o e o o a o e a o e o 0 o e m o 0 0 1n 0 0 0 0 0 1n o 0 1n 0 0 0 1n 0 0 0 0 0 N ' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c « (O ¢1 1yy0 10 m O m m m C'I 01 O N Q Q Q Q Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ N_ F_ N_ Q Q Q Q Q N N N N N E E E m m m m m e 0 0 E E E E E O 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 O m m 0 O O O O O N N N N m u m N E c E E c c c c c c a v_ a_ w w m Y N Y Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y NY E E E E E E E L L L X % m ; N m m m a d y O m d N v D 1 4o y N a N y 9 N B �0 N N N N VC l E E O 8 U C i J C c U C L o m m a m v .N p N In O N N N N Vl N N zi 0 0 O C J J c N N E 0 0 m j O« 0 z Z O O z c 0 0 z c m c c C C O C c C m m N N m O :g 3: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 3 Z« C m 0 3 •T 3 3 Y z m m N O O C C O S' C C C O Y Y Y Y Y �n 5[ 3 3 m 3 0 m 3 `m 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 m m m 3 m 3 N N Y x 10 L j Y Y 0 L L L L t L V L L L 0m33�;a33m B B m B m w 8BMB I. w d m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N UC C L L yl j L L C r C C C C C C C C C C X O O 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 N O O m 0 0 m m 8 E 0 N N 8 0_ a a a a o_ a a a z z m 0 N N c M 0 m m (a0 D a E a D❑❑ a N N Z Z O O a a N� 1 C 0 B 0 J m J N O N IC Ik 0 'M 0 0 tt N N 0 O O y O N O O m y m m c0 0 m 1 E o 0 0N `o o o y y 0 0 0 1 e` w 0 E" 3 i o O a c m m a c Y E E J E Y �n L L E m m 1`0p m L m m E E U J m E E U U (n z i O O O O � v v L r L m j .❑ c B O O 0 Z ND m m 0 m ooB v v o O _ m � (t¢ m; �~ Bm d oa Y 0 0 O O J O O m idL n rdn d 0 C ` C e zo E L* A L E t m m U U J U U 1 J — N J J C J J N 0 0 N L J C 0 J J J X • 'v1 O 0 O N O z O p O N m w 3 m w 0 Z 0 0 z 0 Z 0 WIZ 0 0 2 0 fn 0 0 2 0 f� 0 N 0 0 Z 0- m E O O O O O O O L L j j • D D v a v K K K 0_' d' K K C C .c B y 3 o o o o o a v v v a v v v p E D o o❑ o x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?? m y N � � � � 0 0 0 0 m 0 N N j o 0 0 0 0 a c c E U 0 u � 4 L °m C m m m m m m y m y 0 0 3 m m v v m m m m m m m m m m =« E E m 1—/I 3> >v 3> >cmi 3 V 0 0 0 J J J J J J m J� 0 —— Z W N (") d 10 (O f� m Ol O N d N tO A N Of N N N O Of b W N nA 'O d P K N 9 C J LL r A E N W T D J d N m m N E Q w m H A8 m w °a N Z m c E 0 N y F m O O O O O O O O N N N m O O O O O O O O N N N E N O N W (O m OJ OJ N N N C) �O NtO �D �D N tpMM M c o 0 o e v e o 0 o e m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 U GO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m L O O W d « O D O N N N N C N N N N N m a a Y m c O_ Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 9 d d d 9 d d d d d E m m m m m m m m m m m L L L L L L L L L L m m N m N N fll N N m N N m m m m m ° E v v m v v 8 c a;i c a3i c a3i c c c c a;i c a3i c c a N r Z L_ C O 3 Y M 3 m m U C O U m C N M m C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 0 v azzzzzzzzzz ) ) � j L O t L o m m m m zzz c 2 N N N N �mdaaaoaoBB cjr cr (r 888d8mmm N 11 i(l l6 fA fA fn V1 VJ fA U1 (n L r r m m m m m m m m q O z O z O Z c m c m c m c m c m c m c m c m m y y¢ 4 Q 6 0 0 0 j m d m� C C r t c ti C j c mmi08'a22.8222 1 m ( N L lm L L 0 W 0 KKRK 0 0 0 O MM O O O' 1 m 0 0 0 N m N N m N (% y z v°i i nw3ww3wM 0 m m m Z° W��z°z°z°Z°Z°z°Z um 0 d c c c 8 N y N o 0 o N N j d o m 1 5 L L E c m m Km r�imn� i0a thN N N N O IA d .7 Q N C LL d A E .y W N Y 3 M c 0 Q d N 0. O a` iA8 N w a w x N N M 1w N M 161 1 3 1!� _S , IYllil�l� R rW � W H asaa aeza w J_ w Z W J a U n_ 0 161 14 AB O 3 O m C 1Z O r V m N N 3 0 C A W N+ O 1A J A N A W N O b W V 01 N A W N O b W J T N ;0 ;0 � m m O 0 0 m O O O m T m O '1 Z m z m Z -4 O Z m O D O D v fPl T m C O O m m ''pp C C A 71 D T T V, mmA 2 m A O T T T= O n m A C r A (� C D= 0 G) G) -i O m A D , m G m 1 r ,T 0 1 n m D Z Z= � (1 Z T 2 A m Z z y� (n A 7J Z 2 N m Z m m= y D F .1m7 .Tml (Z� m (z� (z// y O D .Tml = Z m _I F { { w G G T -a 1 T .y r G 'E m 0 9 3 O 0 r Z w 0 .� m m m m T T m m m m m = G< c m m m � -� m 0 p 3 Z� A C (/1 o < m m m 0 0 0 n m w 'o C o A W m Z A D r D w T O .Z7 C1 A .Z7 m c m O m (p (7 = T O fn D 2 D Z K D (A m D Z - O Z z N A T T yy , 0 0 m A O Z D Z m D Z m �_ 5 Z ,Z1 D 0 m D p T r m r A 0 0 Z { N m Z m m D p W L7 T 0 T Z c W O m m D p D A M 0 A 0 .T c X 0? O Z ]] m m 00 (R , D c Z{ m Z m '� m N 5 N T m 0 x m m G) n A m m m O m O O m O m (7 T Z G) m N Z Z A Z m �I m c m N N Z Z m G) D C r .T Z ? n T 0 m Z m m O 3 D D y 3 Z�j C Z m yy X V A m m m D� Z O D m ti OC O n � r r m� O � m 0 Z 0 .T m q� x X .0 .Zml e y N m C mT O D O m N T D T Z Z fm m 3 (m/1 Z O r r O m ;u ;o 5 DDmm x r A < m (mn z m Z m m 0 0 O { m m D 0 0 0 0 m M M fR N fA fA M di N fA N N di (A N iP fA N fA (A ER N fA (R tN :» d1 <M N N fA EN (A iR (A N fA fA N fA EN � D 3 � m CO A�O�WW OI 01wN WWmW j i IJ IV V+ m OI A W W V O N O W O O O U� V OJ A Oo 0 0� N W W O� O O O b00 O O O S O N N W O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O W A O O 0 O 0 O N iG O O U+ O O O O O O O O W O O O O O O O O O O O O O+ N (T A N O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O m O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O N N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O t! ` _N 3 3 O O O A r W m N (00 O N N 1O <O O O O O O O N N M N (A N N ER M M N fA f» fA d1 N fA bi fA N W (A N (p fN fA fR iR N N N N fA EH fA N fA fA fA ER N m x n M HER M fA fA N fR N fA N f» fA N ER iH (A f» f» l» N M fA ER N fA En ER N M fA EH (A fA f» M (N N N fA iH D AO � (yOb p N N G m W A T O G O O O O V V O O O O OI O O O O O 0 000. 0 0 0 0 000+10 0 0 Ri p 0 O WO OO OO Ob OO O0 O O O . O A O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 N O V O W O V O O O w O O O O O �(iO O 0 O 3 O m C 1Z O r V m N N 3 0 C X m N V OWf 01 V X d v CD W O -n 91 CD C o CD N�� @ 0 N V A 0 D d CD ,T N O W O J O W o � W O 4 [I O m a 0 CL 'N! n u o o c _ 3 °' m w m. N 9" ■ tD N 4 K { 4 u i c c c 16 11 A8 1 3 O 0 o M tr m CD 3 N V C O T O C Z v i -i NU) Cl) m Z �- (_ �- >> 3 m m n n 0 S O c) c A N d 6 O o o o v v c o c r r r r r r r c 3 �p c 3 3 3 y m D N D v " 3 3 3 < N N W CD N N N N n N 7 N N N tD 7 O' () CD n N Q 0 t7 7 (n O d. = t0 tj t0 f0 t0 (� (� N (D 01 Oi N A Z (D- 0° r r r (D N cD m 90 N ' N N d n ID _ o n � o > >' 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Ln cn Ln Ln cn NP 01 Nn 0 N CT cn N Nn Ln Nn cn Nn Nn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W N is W N O N N N W N w" O 0 -• A M O 0 NT cn A N N N N N A W A (A W N W N W w O 4 A A A N N N O 00 00 N N N (T � V O� 0 (A O (b W Cn V (A 00 A O p _r O C O C� 01 n (O 0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 C C ND ^^ M.m j N �.. N NO Q- N N N n (D N N G cn C 7 N N N M O c (D l W 7 -0 (D ND N ND ND N (D ND 2 �'m N D D D D D D D c a m CD O N (D ? N (D n n n 0 n n n (OD 7 77 (D 7 ? 3 =r :7 3 S 7' N N to Qp �7 c1 () N (D 0 ID ^' fD (D tD 0 ND tD (D 2 O 3 7 C O _n O iU N c 'M1 c c (D a (p 1 d 1 N 1 c1 1 d N l N 1 d (n (D C N CD N N N N N N N CD 2 2 CD I I O O O' O O Q, O, N CD N % N N I 0 N i N fA fA to fA '40, fA EA to fli 'o 0 EJ! 'A fA 0, to A A d1 fA T N 3 w K3 W =� O j O N (4 O O A N N N N c0 A N A 1 W N O V W O tb O N O t0 O— 0) O— t0 O �. a O O O A 0 0 -1 W CO CO 00 + M 0! w t0 O O O O O W O O -+ A O Oa O N M O c0 to O O ► EA EA EA fA Efl 16A Efl Efl (fl fA 69 'A EA t9 EA EA to Efl to (fl EA W 0 OD t� 0 V N m N O O O ! CD "0 O . O O o o o io 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 O 0 o M tr m CD 3 N V C O T O C Z v i 161 1 A8 r Report Date: September 22, 2010 Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Immokalee MSTU Project Status (IMM -23) — ACTIVE- Christmas Lighting Project 08- 25 -10: CRA Staff has provided 5 `selected' images for review by MSTU Committee. Funding for the project will be either 50150 split between MSTU /CRA. Or will be 1/3 split between CRA/MSTU /Immokalee Casino. Funding by Immokalee Casino is not confirmed. 10- 27 -10: MSTU Liaison Staff is working with Engineer for `wind load calculations' (IMM-23) — ACTIVE- Banner Project 9- 22 -10: Sample size was 5. To I inch too short — manufacturer to provide updated sample. 10- 27 -10: Carrot Top is reviewing the size and type of connection for the banner. (IMM -22) — ACTIVE- Cross -Walks & Sightline Study P. O. #4500118491(dated 6- 16- 2010); REP 408 -5060 Annual Landscape Architectural Services 06- 17 -10: Notice to Proceed sent to JRL 10- 27 -10: Staff will review project with FDOT at upcoming meeting (meeting date /time TBD) (IMM -21) — ACTIVE- Immokalee MSTU Irrigation Antenna Tower Project 10- 27 -10: E.B. Simmonds to provide quote for installation of the picalo units which will communicate with antenna. (IMM -20) — ACTIVE- First Street & Hwy 29 Survey Professional Service Proposal for Immokalee MSTU (RWA, Inc. File NO. 100042.00.00) P. O. #4500116931 (dated 04/01/2010) Contract: # 06 -3944 — Annual Fixed Term Surveying & Photometric Services 10- 27 -10: Survey is 100% completed. Pending Staff and consultant review. (IMM -19) — ACTIVE- 1" Street Irrigation /Landscape Refurbishment Project 10- 27 -10: 100 %recieved from JRL (IMM -18) — ACTIVE- Hwy 29 Irrigation /Landscape Refurbishment Project 10- 27 -10: 100% plans received from JRL. (IMM-17) — ACTIVE- "Edgerrin James Sign" Request for Sign indicating "Welcome to Immokalee home of Edgerrin James" for motorist who are traveling to Immokalee 9- 22 -10: staff recommends investigation into `private' property for the installation as opposed to road ROW. 10- 27 -10: CRA to report (IMM -16) — ACTIVE- "Miles ahead" Sign Request for Sign indicating "Miles ahead" to Immokalee for motorist who are traveling to Immokalee 08- 25 -10: Traffic Operations is installing 6 signs at various locations 10- 27 -10: 2 signs installed —other locations under review. (IMM -15) — ACTIVE - ONGOING —LA Maintenance Consulting Work Order for JRL; Landscape Architectural Services 9- 22 -10: Ongoing Services from JRL Design (IMM -11) — ACTIVE - ONGOING — Roadway Maintenance: BID #09 -5264 03- 01 -10: NTP Issued under new Contract #09 -5264, `Immokalee Road MSTU /MSTD Landscape Maintenance" 1 CD N D m rn r N N m R28E R29E 41 W 0 9 �gyl H g p p� P W v S N N o W o � C N tD n 2 I� A ti D m 1611 A8 N O O O W O O O O O O O O N m O N O N N h O O N -N D rn N rn rn O d (O O M O t0 N N O E V M N m O n (V N .y OJ M O t0 rn M n M O N M N 01 O) M 4l T O GJ N C d N t0 fA d fA d3 d M t9 fA W tH fA M di fA t9 M fR t9 (O M N H3 �- Eli t9 fA e9 Ui M C o 0 0 0 0 0 o a o a o 0 0 o a o a o o a a o N O O O N O O O O O N O O N O O O N O V O O O t0 O N O d O N N O NJ O N O d O M O f� O� N L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C ' Ep 6t N N M O M M M M rn O RI W M CJ N O N 0 0 0 O] O N •- N N d N N N N N N N N N '- N d r ❑ Q ❑ ❑ Q E E E m 0 0 0 E E E E E Q C ¢ ¢ C C C C C C Q p_ ❑ ❑ O O O O O O Q ¢� Y Y Y¢ O O O ry O O O O O O N N N N N ro E c E E c c c c c c a a a N N Vl N Y N Y Y N Y N Y N Y Y N Y Y 0 0 W N N N N m m a d a X v o X d° Vl N d N 0 d QQ r p N 0 0 0 O 010 ry O ry O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 C C C 0 C U C C U C U C U C V C U C U C N JO E 0 0 0 O Z O O O N N 9 N N O N VJ w w Z z V Z w w N N N N N N Z Z O O Z L E L C ^L.. C C O r C i C C N fn O Y 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 O O O N N p� c c c 3 O O C C O Y o C G C O Y Y Y Y Y 'm jp 1' Y Y 0 0 0 0 > m e m et ro i m m m 3 3° 3 3 vi 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ro ro m ro 6 3 3 m 3 3 an d m et a ro N N ro fO ro U N ro ro m dmu w m_° 'R m m m ro m m m m m m m m m m m C C O N N O ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro O O X m O 0 O 0 N ro m O° 0 E 0 ro ro 0 a a a a a a a a a a z z z ro ° c E "0 .O N N¢ C E a a a ❑❑ O N z z Q Q b ro> ro ro> O O y ry a J O a a _ _ N N O O a d M `m o o m¢¢ o 0 C C [L J F Q Q Y Y C C [L m °° 0 in Y Y E E N Y N Y 0 ro N S L E E (d (� O O w LO F w ro U ro0 U w J E E U <n m m E E U U w z 0 ° p 0 CC o Q m o 0 0 p w L C L C m. i 16 11A8 t WMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMITTEE October 27, 2010 Minutes The meeting was called to order by Cherryle Thomas at 4:50 p.m. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Cherryle Thomas, William Deyo (Absent), Lucy Ortiz, Andrea Halman, Carrie Williams (Excused) County: Darryl Richard — Project Manger Others: Richard Tindell -JRL, Bradley Muckel -CRA, Darlene Lafferty - Juristaff III. Approval of Agenda Andrea Halman moved to approve the agenda as presented. Second by Lucy Ortiz. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes: September 22, 2010 Lucy Ortiz moved to approve the September 22, 2010 minutes as submitted. Second by Cherryle Thomas. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. V. Code Enforcement - Weldon Walker reported the following: o Neighborhood Cleanup was successful 0 31 tons of waste was removed - Tires were the majority of the waste removed o A future Cleanup will be scheduled - Date TBD due to upcoming the Holidays o A representative from Animal Control was not present during the Neighborhood Cleanup (as requested by the Committee) Lucy Ortiz perceived the Neighborhood Cleanup as a success and commended the Community and Agencies on a job well done. VI. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report Darryl Richard reported on Budget items: (See attached) o Anticipated Ad Valorem Tax $364,000.00 1611 A8 • Improvements General Commitments $56,708.62 includes - Irrigation Refurbishment Project (currently underway) - Project related P.O. s for JRL Design Consultant • Available Improvements General $621,400.00 • Increase in Taxable Value due to the Boundary Expansion • Carry Forward will be reconciled in February 2011 B. Project Manager Report-Darryl Richard reported: (See attached) Cemetery Proiect • Under review by Parks and Recreation • Irrigation Cost $2,500.00 - $5,000.00 • Landscape Cost $5,000.00 • Fence Cost is under $4,000.00 - Pending approval by Parks and Recreation - (3) Quotes are required (IMM -24) Christmas Lighting Proiect • Consultant (TB &E Engineering) requires additional information from the Manufacturer for Wind load calculation (as required by FDOT) • Staff will contact the FDOT Representative (to discuss the Wind load calculation requirement) • Perceived the Christmas Lights will not be approved before the Christmas season Brad Muckel suggested obtaining a Letter from the Manufacturer (with a PE seal) stating that the Proposed (Decorations) represents a lower wind hold threshold than what the Poles were originally designed to support. Cherryle Thomas questioned the need for a Permit to display Christmas Decorations as Banners have been displayed in the Immokalee Community for the past 15 years. Richard Tindell suggested decorating the Poles with Garland to have some form of Decoration displayed for the Christmas season. Staff will contact the Pole Manufacturer (Montreal Canada) to request the validation Letter (with PE seal) as suggested by Brad Muckel. (IMM -23) Banner Proiect o Manufacturer provided a revised sample to Staff for review (IMM -22) Cross -Walks & Sightline Study o Meeting with FDOT (Staff, Eugene Calvert, and JRL) will be scheduled to address the white Bollards (IMM -17) Edgerrin James Sign 2 161 1 A8 Brad Muckel stated review of a Property Map is needed to determine a proposed location (on Private Property) for the Sign on Hwy 29. (IMM -16) Miles ahead Sign Cherryle Thomas stated the following: • Requested to install a Sign as you exit the Ava Maria entrance area at Camp Keais (the back entrance to Publix) • Rejected the proposed Sign location on 846 (by Sunnyland Farms) as it is State Road • Requested Staff confirm the Sign was installed on Oil Well Rd. Immokalee Pathway Project Darryl Richard announced the Sidewalk Project was presented to the PAC (Pathways Advisory Committee.) Discussion ensued on the proposed Pathway List and the amount of Funds needed to complete the Project. (See attached) The Committee restated the Sidewalks will be installed in order of priority. Richard Tindell reviewed Additions to the Pathway Project List. (See attached) Brad Muckel stated the following: • PAC will not consider Funding the Sidewalk at Lake Trafford Elementary • Recommended removing Sidewalks that are located near Schools as the PAC suggested to apply for Monies through the Save Our Schools Grant Program Richard Tindell perceived the recommendation to remove the Sidewalks that are located near schools was an issue: • Sidewalks were designed to meet with School paths • Volunteered to attend the PAC meeting on Friday (October 29th) • Suggested breaking out the area from Little League to the Lake as a separate Unit on the proposed Pathway Project List Cherryle Thomas reported inoperable lights at the following locations: • 11th Street extension (Blue light) • Blue Median Lights on 3`d Street, 4th Street, and 5th Street do not illuminate at night Staff will notify the Contractor of the Light repairs. 16 I:1 A8 Richard Tindell noted Item #12 Lake Trafford Rd. $858,000.00 will be removed from the Pathway List and added to the Supplemental Future Project List. VII. Transportation Maintenance Report-CLM - None VIII. Landscape Architect Report- JRL Design Richard Tindell reviewed the Maintenance Report: (See attached) o Dirt was repaired on the Median sides o Mulch was installed o Removed dead Foxtails • Plantings were installed - Fertilizer was applied • Reviewed Photos (3, 4, and 5) of dying Plants (See attached) - Perceived as a water issue for the dying plants Darryl Richard will provide a Quote at the November meeting to install Median Irrigation. Discussion ensued concerning the dying Plants and Irrigation issues. Darryl Richard recommended the following: • Plant Tissue Testing • Compare past and present Water Usage reports Richard Tindell perceived the troubled Plant Materials were salvageable (with proper irrigation.) Richard Tindell reviewed Photos from the Field Report: (See attached) Photo 1 o Dead Crown of Thorn Planter Box required replacement Cherryle Thomas reported (3) Banners are not secured as the bottom stitching is missing (at the entrance to Ft. Myers.) Darryl Richard suggested installing replacements for problematic Plant Materials in photo 4. Discussion ensued on locations where Trash Receptacles are filling up quickly. The Committee perceived Store Owners use the Receptacles for Business purposes and is a Code Enforcement issue. Staff will confer with Code Enforcement on usage of Trash Receptacles by local Businesses. IX. Community Redevelopment Agency Brad Muckel reported the following on current CRA initiatives: Immokalee Storm Water Master Plan - consists of 5 sub projects: 16 11 A8 o Downtown Immokalee Storm Water Project (area south of Hwy 29 and west of South Vt Street) will launch the Master Plan - At 60% Plan submittal stage - Submitting Permit Application next week to SFWMD (South Florida Water Management District) - Construction will commence - July 2011 - Completion date - July 2012 Fagade Grant Program • Florida Specialties (on East Main Street) - On the BCC Agenda (for approval) - CRA awarded $20,000.00 for Storefront improvements - www. floridaspecialties. orq • Jackie's Unisex Salon (on South 15' Street) - Previously approved by the BCC - Awarded $20,000.00 by the CRA Sidewalk Improvements o Collaboration is underway with County Transportation for Sidewalks - Boston and Colorado (from 1st Street to 9th) Brad Muckel announced FERBA (Florida Rural Broadband Alliance) was awarded $24,000,000.00 Grant monies to provide Broadband to 14 Counties in Tribal Lands. Construction will be complete within 18 months X. Old Business A. Water Symposium -None XI. New Business A. November Meeting The Committee agreed to reschedule the November 24't meeting to November 17th due to the Thanksgiving Holiday. XII. Public Comment -None There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 6:05 PM. 161 1 Immokalee Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee Cherryle Th as, Chairman These minutes approved by the Committee on i- a ( I as presented is or amended The next meeting is November 17, 2010 at 4:30 p.m. One Stop Career Center 750 South 5t" Street Immokalee, FL 34142 Jf / U.T.U. A VIMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATA U ADVISORY COMMITTEE November 17, 2010 Minutes The meeting was called to order by Cherryle Thomas at 4:30 p.m. A quorum was established. Attendance Members: Cherryle Thomas, William Deyo, Lucy Ortiz (Excused), Andrea Halman (Excused), Carrie Williams County: Darryl Richard — Project Manger, Pam Lulich- Landscape Operations Manager Others: Jim Fritchey -CLM, Richard Tindell -JRL, Christie Betancourt-CRA, Darlene Lafferty— Juristaff III. Approval of Agenda William Deyo moved to approve the agenda as presented. Second by Came Williams. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes: October 27, 2010 Cherryle Thomas requested to table approval of the October minutes until the next meeting. V. Code Enforcement - Weldon Walker -None VI. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report Darryl Richard gave the following information: (See attached) o Available Capital Outlay $621,400.00 Carrie Williams inquired on the Budget Report Format changes that were discussed at a prior meeting (September.) Darryl Richard perceived format changes will take place on future Budget Reports (pg 2, Expanded P.O. Description) and stated he will follow up with Gloria Herrera on the requested change. B. Project Manager Report—Darryl Richard reported: (See attached) (IMM -23) Christmas Lighting Project o Proposal (by Trimmers Holiday Decor) to install Garland was emailed to the Committee for comments 161 1 A6 • The Garland will contain Lights at locations with an electrical outlet currently installed • Installation of Garland in lieu of wire frame Fixtures is a substantial cost savings • The Garland will be installed (84 Poles) by December 1St Discussion ensued concerning the Garland Project and CRA cost sharing. Cherryle Thomas perceived the 50/50 cost share with the CRA will remain true for Christmas Decorations in lieu of wire frame Fixtures. Cherryle Thomas restated the preferred time span to display the Christmas Banners: • Install Christmas Banners by Wednesday November 24th • Removal of Christmas Banners by January 6th Darryl Richard stated CLM will perform MOT (Maintenance of Traffic) for Trimmers Holiday Decor during installation of the Decorations. Jim Fritchey noted MOT Services by CLM is required as the Trimmers Holiday Decor is not MOT Certified. Darryl Richard continued (IMM -19) 1St Street lm ation/Landscape Refurbishment Proiect o Reviewed Quote by EB Simmonds for 1St Street - Replace Wires and Install Conduit - Total Irrigation Refurbishment estimate $61,610.00 o Noted the benefits of the Irrigation Refurbishment - The Irrigation System will be monitored around the clock by the County Central Control System - In the event of an overflow the Central Control System will immediately shutdown the Irrigation System - Water usage will be Monitored Richard Tindall gave additional information on the Irrigation Project: • The Existing valves and timers are not the issue as they are operational • October 2010 was the 6th driest October on record • Irrigation Valves are remotely adjusted by the Central Control System to eliminate dry spots • The ET (Evaporation Transfer Rate) and Rain Fall Chart (3 Bar Graph) represents the following (see Attached) - ET Rate (Evaporation Transfer Rate) estimates the monthly needs of ornamental plants in water (produced by the University of Florida) - National Study indicates Rainfall over a 30 year period - Indicates 2010 Actual Rain Fall • The Irrigation System Cost will preclude potential dry conditions 2 1611 A8 Darryl Richard reviewed (3) AG TRONIX Quotes for Irrigation Components for 1St Street. (See attached) o $12,075.65 o Moisture Sensors $759.00 (in addition to the Base Quote) o (2) Control Pads $1,004.00 William Deyo moved to approve the Bid from EB Simmonds for the amount stated on the estimate ($61,610.00) and approve AG TRONIX Bid not to exceed $14,000.00. Second by Came Williams. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. VII. Transportation Maintenance Report-CLM Jim Fritchey reported the following: • Mulching is complete • Staff requested CLM trim the Crape Myrtle VIII. Landscape Architect Report-JRL Design Richard Tindall reviewed the following: Trimmers Holiday Decor Proposal o Quote amount of $5,750 to Decorate the following locations - All Poles on 1St Street - Poles on Main Street (from 1St Street to 9m Street) - Poles on the North side of 9th Street - (4) Poles at Immokalee Dr. - (4) Poles at Lake Trafford Staff noted the Trimmers Holiday Decor P.O. requires a $900.00 increase as additional Pole Locations were added to the Project. November Report (See attached) • Immokalee (8) Miles Ahead sign (pg 1, upper right Photo) • All Grass on Main Street will be replaced with Plant Material (pg 1, lower left Photo) • Crown of Thorn is recovering due to Fertilization (pg 2, lower left) o CLM was requested to install Bubblers at the base of (3) Crape Myrtle (pg 2, lower right) Pathways Advisory Committee Meeting Report (See attached) o (4) of the proposed Immokalee Projects made it through the 1St round of elimination Richard Tindell reviewed the Planting Plan for 1St Street and Hwy 29. Jim Fritchey reviewed the CLM estimate $30,148.00 to include: 0 Plant Materials and installation • Irrigation (labor) • Plant Bed prep work 1611 Au Discussion took place and it was noted the CLM Quote includes: 0 2000 Plants (Installed) 0 6000 sq. ft. sod removal o Removal of 30 cubic yards of fill is required o Excluded Irrigation parts and materials - Requested additional Budget amount of $2,500. 00 for parts and materials o The Project will be initiated on 15t Street and Main Street. William Deyo moved to approve $30,200.00 (CLM Quote) for Landscaping installation, Plants and Irrigation and $2,500.00 for Irrigation Materials. Second by Carrie Williams. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. Cemetery • It was confirmed 6 graves are in the Cemetery • Temporary Drip Irrigation System was installed • Parks and Recreation agreed to maintain the Cemetery - Weed - Mow - Trim - Fertilize Carrie Williams requested the names of the deceased in the Cemetery. Richard Tindall will provide the information available to Carrie Williams. Jim Fritchey provided an estimate of $3,500.00 for Irrigation and Plant Materials for the Cemetery. The Fence Material Quote $3,867.00 was reviewed by Richard Tindell and Darryl Richard. William Deyo moved to approve $3,500.00 (CLM Quote) for Landscaping at the Cemetery, additionally approve not to exceed amount of $4,000.00 for the Fence. Second by Carrie Williams. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0. IX. Community Redevelopment Agency Christie Betancourt reported: • CRA Operational Workshop is being held on November 18th at 8:00 a.m. -1:00 p.m. • Confirmed the CRA will partner 50/50 with the Immokalee MSTU for Christmas Decorations CI 161 1 A8 X. Old Business -None XI. New Business A. December Meeting The Committee agreed to cancel the December 22nd meeting. Carrie Williams moved to cancel the December meeting. Second by William Deyo. Motion carried unanimously 3 -.0 XII. Public Comment -None There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:45 PM. Immokalee Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee Cherryle TH6mas, Chairman These minutes approved by the Committee on I - as presented %5 or amended The next meeting is January 26, 2011 at 4:30 p.m. One Stop Career Center 750 South 5th Street Immokalee, FL 34142 5 y CD N N w to W N In O j c G lb i 1 A8 O N O O O O M N M m O N O O G O O O O� C O O G O N O C tlJ pj p r N G T O W �I O O O IN N CA O Q N m O O O� N N O O d f0 O O O N ID IP V m O Oi W �p Cp p m " In d d M N N M M d N 0 0 ip O' N 'q O a N N N N N N N N N N Fsi N N N N N N N N N t9 N N U N N N N N N N N N N N N t9 N N M N q M N N N A r O r Q M m r O� yNy O V N CMO 0 O W N N m N N m w m •- O N Q M .O- m m m' N O v u c a n w N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N f9 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O M O Q O CO O m O N m 10 O m CD N Q CA C> r O 0I N m m � A m o M Q Q o N m a ao m m eo m m at $ E � U N N N N N N N N N N N N N �! f9 EH iH V1 FA i M N f9 U3 M E9 M M d3 (f3 �A N N N N N C9 N N f9 N M p O O O N O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 O 0 m N 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 N tl 1 0 O O O O O m m O O O b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W O O G O O CJ 00�p1 G O G O O O A ONNI O O O Q O G O 0 0 0 0 O O d Y) N M M m O O m d a0 0 0 0 O voi O O O g L M C Ol M E° am' N t9 N N N M e9 N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N to N N N N M N N N N N N N N N NNN M W ° U U U Q W � Y U W U W F OU w J< O W> W w 2 O 0 0 N p j = vwi z w? 0 N m U cw7 A '- ~ qa U w ° m t- ° J a U° r > > w O a 0 z K y U w a z U w O m a J z z_ O rn w z U U F w t- w j LL w z ° �' E ° a a �° c7 w U O y w ? a z r z w CD w z z U(n W r w w A z af z z w z O a U o F v i °°> o w w w �UQZN w w w g w o z �a w NY z ° a W W Z S U U ,= ? W U LL LL N a m W �-oa z Z �' -� J w 2 Q v 2 nZU Z 0 ru 0 O O �( 3 K op (7 U' K O Q 2 w U a= U K w~ U Q a U 0 V' J J° r¢ z F- to LL LL> ¢ �' m z_ z_ U z a w f a a> N °' U m w O K K W N o j a� W X X O O w O O U w C7 U° � ¢ a0 Z Z w O O w w w w > 2 fn W w C7 Z C7 ~> K X m O ° F W Y Y °e W 2 a Y= Z (wn a K W Z= D' a m h W W Z fn In m J N d¢= W w> Z K d' U' QZ a f 6 (7 S O S Z W S lLL W a a 6 a O° a fn fn la- K J H LL> H W a a s w O z z °, g m a 7 U' EE U w F LL O W F LL a S W Z Z d' V U Z F l- W W? O 1- = (n R J J J O O U LL O O— U H F- ¢] Rl V- of X F U° lLL F r N N N N N M M M M H M H M N H d m m h m 01 N N N N N H M N f0 z Z � Q LL G N 7 � ~ N> L W W QJ Y � 7 O 2 i 161 1 A8 C M N N O W Q O N OI b b a0 N M Oc Q O M N O W u C 0: Q Q b O� OI N f0 b d7 N M of d7 Oa N 0 A N b Q M Q N N Q d h Yf N N N N Q 0 m M f E d w N w w N w w w w w w w w w N N w N w w N w w w w N w w N w w N w w 6 N C m U U U O U E d N W N N W N U e E m wln In h co NN d b V O N O L m L L u U U U U U U U N N O@ U U E c 'E 2 i Al LL' w °-� m N 2 a; d w d d w m m a m m Y C O N of O-2 c d OI w fn 4 2 L i 2 i m r C O co Q Z N c t s c m m N co o. n a o. n a n '- > N c U N U m m m m m m m a m N d c c a N m e c m w c c c c c c c m o8 � N L ! N E E m m U E m Z a= n c t u ua . O (n M Q D7 (p N Q7 O h fD a0 O OD O) N N N Q p yy �O M N tD f0 N M f0 O) U U f O M O N N N U N N N N N N N Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N IL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u7 O �m N u7 O O N u7 u'1 O O u7 N�� N b b� N O O N u) O N E u7 u7 N N d O a N m O a No U E c c c c c c c U u rn rn Z C °L rG N 0 L N J J J d a E c c c ac c c c c E oo. C D O J J J J J ]6E r m� OI OI m 0 0 %% ` ` ` N N N N c 'c m m m W m E C Z' c m m m m m m m N d w m N N Y E E E E E E m m s u m p p p p 0 `3 m 5£ 5 °—' N E O y N O m t 0 0 0 0 0 o m .B o E K K K ' m O oo oo oo t E U U U U U U U W LL LL LL -- -> > M Z K K N N N N ~~ N L al m �E a o °• m II °v n m c U m �d O y N r M p } O N o Opp V Q Q N b � � O O C 0 w c N m �w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 A A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N M M O O O O O O M M N O O N N O O u ui o o 0 0 0 0 r r N N 0 0 0 0 v vi n n O O c co a ao f fV m hmcoo�o f m n n r r o o o o c c rn v v�� r rom � �mm�uO1i � �m�n h e 0 N 0a N fq w w Y Yi w w w w w w N N w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w N N w w N N w w w w N N w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w N N w w w w N N w w Y Y E N N O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O M M C C? O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b b O O Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a E N L al m �E a o °• m II °v n m c U m �d O y N r M p } O N o Opp V Q Q N b � � O O C 0 w c N m �w 161 1 A8 Report Date: November 17, 2010 Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Immokalee MSTU Project Status (IMM-23) - ACTIVE- Christmas Lighting Project 11- 17 -10: Staff is coordinating with Trimmers Inc. to install garland on the lights. Where there exist 120 volt outlet they will have lights. (IMM-23) - ACTIVE- Banner Project 11- 17 -10: Carrot -Top will be providing an `updated' sample. Order will be confirmed upon approval of sample. (IMM-22) - ACTIVE- Cross -Walks & Sightline Study P. O. #4500118491(dated 6 -16- 2010); RFP #08 -5060 Annual Landscape Architectural Services 11-17-10: RWA 100% survey delivered on 11 -15 has been forwarded to JRL for review. (IMM -21) - COMPLETED - Immokalee MSTU Irrigation Antenna Tower Project 11- 17 -10: Antenna completed (IMM -20) - ACTIVE- First Street & Hwy 29 Survey 11- 17 -10: Survey is 100% completed. (IMM -19)- ACTIVE- I" Street Irrigation /Landscape Refurbishment Project 11- 17 -10: Design is 100% completed. Committee to review quote from EB Simmonds and Ag Tronix for installation. (IMM -I8) - ACTIVE- Hwy 29 Irrigation /Landscape Refurbishment Project 11- 17 -10: 100% plans received from JRL. (IMM -17) - ACTIVE- "Edgerrin James Sign" I1- 17 -10: confirmation of `private property' suitable for installation is pending. (IMM -16) - ACTIVE- "Miles ahead" Sign 11- 17 -10: Staff confirms 2 signs have been installed. Traffic Ops reviewing additional locations. (IMM -15)- ACTIVE - ONGOING -LA Maintenance Consulting Work Order for JRL; Landscape Architectural Services I 1- 17 -10: Ongoing Services from JRL Design (IMM -I 1) - ACTIVE - ONGOING - Roadway Maintenance: BID 409 -5264 11- 17 -10: NTP Issued under new Contract #09 -5264, "Immokalee Road MSTU /MSTD Landscape Maintenance" b 1 1 A8 E.B. SIMMONDS 3750 Enterprise Avenue Ste. #300 ELECTRICAL- INC. Ph: (239) 643 -2770 Naples, Florida 34104 -3659 STREET LIGHTING • UTILITIES • GENERATORS Fax: (239) 643 -6873 INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL Estimate and Contract Date: 11/06/10 C.0 Government Transportation Services Division Quote #: 1012106 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FI 34104 Ph: (239) 252-5775 Fax: (239) 252-6627 Attn: Darryl Richard darrylrichard @colliergov.net We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: Immokalee MSTU 15' St South Irrigation upgrades. Hookup and wiring for one Irrnet, six Piccolos One Building roof mount tower and grounding 680' directional boring 1080' open trenching Twisted shielded cable as used previously Hook up of service and Bermad on north end Total Material and Labor X151 QO THIS CONTRACT EXCLUDES PERMIT, INSPECTION, IMPACT AND UTILITY FEES. We hereby propose to furnish the above complete in accordance with the above specifications for the sum of Sixty one thousand six hundred ten and no /100th Dollars. Payment to be made as follows: Draws upon request. It is the responsibility of the purchaser /owner to provide adequate access to the job site. If during the course of the job it becomes necessary to traverse sidewalks, driveways, grass or sod, flowerbeds, sprinklers, etc. Every effort will be made to avoid any damage. Should breaks occur as a direct result of our machinery, repairs may be made at additional cost to the Owner. All material used in this contract is guaranteed to be as specified, and the entire job is to be done in a neat and substantial manner. Any alteration or deviation from the specifications herein agreed upon involving extra cost of labor and material will be executed upon either a written or verbal order for same, and will become an extra charge over the sum mentioned in this contract. Purchaser agrees to pay interest charges of 1 1/2% per month which is an annual rate of 18 %. In the event payment is not made, purchaser agrees to pay all costs and expenses of collection including interest and attorneys fees. Estimate valid for 30 days. Signed by ACCEPTANCE OF ESTIMATE The foregoing terms, specifications and conditions are satisfactory, and the same are hereby accepted and agreed to, and . hereby authorize you to execute the same. Date Signed by AGRONIX SPECIALIZING IN MOTOROLA IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239 - 657 -5519 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOATM /Transportation FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3301 Tamiami Tr E., Bldg F 7th Flt. Naples, FL 34112 161 1 Ab QUOTATION /PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO. 11/1/2010 1748 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. SonyaCa�ag- tronix.com W W W.AG- "fRONiX.COM� TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLC ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL Immokalee Main Street and Ist Street Irrigation Project Immokalee Sheriffs Station F4864A IRRInet -M AC 12 DO and 4 DT, w/ Radio Kit (Radio 1 1,462.50 1,462.50 Ready) FUE5522A CDM750 Radio 450- 512MHz 1 -25W 1 888.00 888.00 FLN3707 CDM Install Kit 1 120.00 120.00 967 -0159 Power supply, switching, in:85- 264VAC, out:12VUC, 1 110.00 110.00 12.5A, 150W, power factor eorr 493711 Cable/ antenna kit 17ft RG58 phantom MI Iz 450 -470 1 42.00 42.00 451969 LMR400 20' Antenna cable w/ court (LMR400) 1 60.00 60.00 710 -1300 l2v Battery (25AH) Sealed 2 115.00 230.00 TS1 Technical Services (Re Assemble and Burn In) 6 75.00 450.00 Circle K Irrient M F4864A IRRInet -M AC 12 DO and 4 DI, w/ Radio Kit (Radio 1 1,462.50 1,462.50 Ready) V314AS Add AC 4/121/0 Expansion Kit 1 450.00 450.00 FUE5522A CDM750 Radio 450- 512MHz 1 -25W 1 888.00 888.00 FLN3707 CDM Install Kit 1 120.00 120.00 967 -0159 Power supply, switching, in:85- 264VAC, out: I2VDC, 1 110.00 110.00 12.5A, 150W, power factor corr FLN9588A 110/24v AC Transformer (Irrinet M) 1 160.00 160.00 MLB -I2 -AC Surge Protector AC 4in /12out 2 378.00 756.00 51020 -WM L,eviton Surge Protection 1 189.00 189.00 7299 -NW (8299 -... OFF W /Switch and Cover Leviton (15Amp) 1 39.00 39.00 TP7010 (T -11) Single Gang Box I 4.15 4.15 493711 Cable/ antenna kit 170 RG58 phantom MHz 450 -470 1 90.00 90.00 61600 Mini UHF Male Crimp -RG58 Connector 1 4.00 4.00 FT QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. SonyaCa�ag- tronix.com W W W.AG- "fRONiX.COM� AGRONIX SPECIALIZING IN MOTOROLA IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239 -657 -5519 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOATM /Transportation FINANCE. DEPARTMENT 3301 Tamiami Tr F:, Bldg F 7th Plr. Naples, FL 34112 16 11 A8 QUOTATION /PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO. 11/1/2010 1748 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya n ag- tronix.com W W W.AG= TRONIX.COM TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SI.0 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL SB -241)SS SS Enclosure DD 24W X 3611 24D (County to Supply 1 0.00 0.00 PED -24DSS from Stock) SS Pedestals 24W X 1211 X 20D (County to Supply from I 0.00 0.00 TSI Stock) Technical Services (Assembly and Burn in) 4 75.00 300.00 Remote Piccolo XR's 1 0.00 0.00 F4614A PICCOLO -XR I/I (From Collier County Stock) 0.00 F4614AN379AII PICCOLO -XR 2/2 (From Collier County Stock) 2 0.00 0.00 F4614AN 118AG PICCOLO -XR 4/4 (Prom Collier COunty Stock) 2 0.00 932.00 F4614ANI 18AG PICCOLO -XR4 /4 "No 1 6 932.00 109.00 654.00 AG- SPI10920CI B... Pedestal housing 9 "W x 20 "H Diameter Pad Lock" ABH Aluminum Battery Holder 6 10.00 15.50 60.00 93.00 AN T-5 5ftxI "x1/4" aluminum flat bar Piccolo X R antenna 6 SP -2 bracket 2'ftxI 1 /4" Aluminum Flat Bar (Bracket for BSP -2 -7) "x 6 10.00 60.00 18 75.00 1,350.00 TSI Technical Services IR- 910- WO- P -X -... Bermad 900" Series 2" Hydrometer, Magnetic Drive, 24V 2 495.75 991.50 AC Sol. NC, Threaded Globe, IPulse /l OGal (NON BID ITEM) TOTAL $12,075.65 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya n ag- tronix.com W W W.AG= TRONIX.COM AGRONIX SPECIAL121NO IN MOTOROLA IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239 -657 -5519 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOATMrrransportation FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3301 Tamiami Tr E, Bldg F 7th Fir. Naples, FL 34112 16, 1 A8 QUOTATION /PROPOSAL DATE QUOTE NO. 11/15/2010 1754 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya(c_i)ag- tronix.com W W W.AG-TR0NIX.COM TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLC ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL Moisture Senors OPTION 2575 GroPoint Lite Sensor 4 -20ma V Analog l 175.00 175.00 MIF -N Isolated 2 Wire Analog Converter 4-20mA to 400 -3600 1 220.50 220.50 P/H (IIIz), P. Supply 12V DC 610 -0004 Scaled Lead Acid Battery (Rechargeable) 12V 1 63.50 63.50 TSI Technical Services (Install unit and setup in ICC) 4 75.00 300.00 This is for one sensor setup at desired depth. It's been a pleasure working with you! TOTAL $759.00 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya(c_i)ag- tronix.com W W W.AG-TR0NIX.COM AGRONIX SPECIALIZING IN MOTOROLA IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 1304 N. 15th STREET IMMOKALEE, FL. 34142 239 - 657 -5519 CUSTOMER NAME Collier County DOATM /Transportation FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3301 '1 amiami Ti E, Blclg F 7th Fir, Naples, FL 34112 lb i 1 Q QUOTATION /PROP�SALO DATE QUOTE NO. 11/15/2010 1755 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya n>ag- tronix.com W W W.AG- TRONIX.COM TERMS REP SHIP VIA PROJECT Net 30 SLC ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE TOTAL Immokalee MSTIJ ICCCS ICC Terminal Control Unit (NON -BID ITEM) 2 450.00 900.00 (TO PROGRAM NEW MOTOROLA IRRINET M UNIT) USB /SERIAL ADT USB to Serial Port Adaptor (NON -BID ITEM) 2 11.00 22.00 SERIAL /ETHER... Serial to Ethernet Adaptor W /Cable (NON -BID ITEM) 2 41.00 82.00 Thank you for your business. TOTAL $1,004.00 QUOTE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. Sonya n>ag- tronix.com W W W.AG- TRONIX.COM Q V/ 5� tRtf�7 Fiala Hiller 6 7 1 �d OHenning I'll Coylo January 10, 2011 _ ✓ _ V :........... ............ MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CONSERVATION COLLIER LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE is Colette Naples, Florida, January 10, 2011 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Conservation Collier band Acquisition Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F ", Id Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CIIAIRMAN: Bill Poteet VICE CIIAIRMAN. Michael Delate Tony Pires Jeffrey Curl Jeremy Sterk Thomas Sobczak Annisa Karim Clarence Tears (Excused) Lauren Gibson ALSO PRESENT: Alexandra Sulecki, Conservation Collier Coordinator Steve Williams, Assistant County Attorney Cindy Erb, Real Property Management Melissa Hennig, Prin.Environmental Spec.,Program Man. Mark Isackson, Director of Corporate Finance Therese Stanley, Sr. Budget Analyst Barry Williams, Dir. Parks and Recreation Department Misc. Cores: Date: tf/ °�O) Item 161 1 A9 January 10.2011 I. Roll Call Chairman Poteet called the meetiuU to order at 9:OOAM. Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. 1I. Election of New Chair and Vice Chair Mr. Delate moved to nominate Bill Poteet as Chairman of the Conservation (,'other Land Acquisition Advisory Committee. Set and by Ms. Karim. Carried unanimously 6 -A Mr. Delate moved to close the nominations jor Chairman. Second by ,11s. Karim. Carried unanimously 6 -0. Mr. Poteet was declared Chairman of the Committee. Mr. Delate moved to nominateAnnisa Karim as Vice Chairman of the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee. Second hV Mr. Curt. Carried unanimousl y 6-0. Mr. Delate moved to clove the nominations for Vice Chairman. Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously 6-0. Ms. Karim was declared Vice Chairman of the Committee. Mr. Sobczak arived ut 9:01 urn IlI. Approval of Agenda Mr. Delate moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Ur. Curl. Carried unanimously 7 -0. IV. Approval of December 13, 2010 minutes Mr. Curt moved to approve the minutes of the December 13, 2010 meeting. Second by Mr. Delate. Carried unanimously 7 -0. See item P711. E fw• motion to correct minutes as requested by Eilie Krier. V. Old Business A. Real Property Management Update Winchester Head -- dosing on 3 parcels today: to date 71.214 acres acquired. Unit 53 - closing on 2 parcels today; to date b> parcels acquired totaling 181,98 acres. Mr. Pares arrived at 9.04om B. Recommended Active Acquisition List Alex Solecki, Conservation Collier Coordinator provided the document -Cycle 8 RecomrnendedAciive Acquisition List" dated Llecernber 13, 2011 and noted at the previous meeting, she reported in error, the property owner for Worthington- 161 IA9 January 10, 201 1 Collier LTC offered a 30 percent discount on the parcel, however the offer was from the owners of Gateway Shoppes 11, LLC. She questioned if the Committee wanted to make any changes to the previously approved acquisition list? The Committee determined no changes were required to the approved list. Ms. Karim moved to request Staff to add a notation to the document outlining the Committee's intent that acquisition of Area 1I of the Barron Collier Investments, LTD. (BCI) parcel's is contingent upon the County acquiring Area I of the BCI, LTD parcels. C. Budget Melissa Hennig, Principal Environmental Specialist, Program Manager, presented the following documents for discussion: • "Fiscal Year 2011 Carry forward Analysis Fund 172 -- Conservation Collier" from the December 13, 2010 Conservation Collier meeting. • "Conservation Collier Land Maintenance Fund (174) -- Projected Expenses and Revenues FY 2011 - FY2020" from the December 13, 2010 Conservation Collier meeting. • "Conservation Collier Land Maintenance Fund (17 4) - Projected Expenses and Revenues FY2021 - 1772025" from the December 13, 2010 Conservation Collier meeting. • "Table 2. Projected Revenue" from May of 2010. • "Ad Valorem Revenues Conservation Collier" from the December 13, 2010 Conservation Collier meeting. • "Conservation Collier.ffay 2010 and December 2010 Projections" from the December 13, 2010 Conservation Collier meeting. Therese Stanley, Sr. Budget Analyst provided the document "Conservation Collier Land Maintenance Fund (174) - Projected Expenses and Revenues FY 2011 - FY2020 - FYI 2 346 down/FY13 flat" and" Conservation Collier Land Maittenance Fzmd (174) - Projected Expenses and Revenues FY 2011 - FY 2020 - FY12 flatIFY13 3,% up ° for consideration. The following was noted under Staff/Committee member discussion: • The documents provided by Ms. Hennig were for historic information purposes. • The documents provided Ms. Stanley are revised revenue projections based on the best available data and should be utilized by the Committee for budget planning purposes. • Staff now projects taxable values will decrease by 3% in FYI 2 as opposed to the previous projection of 7% decrease. • Actual taxable values will not be available until June of 2011 • The total "one time costs" of approximately $5M in FY12 outlined in the Land'vlaintenance Fund (174) are amenities proposed for the various Preserves. 16 I 1 A9 January 10, 201 1 • To assist in budget planning, Staff is requesting the Committee identify, the amenities required for each Preserve and prioritize them. • Future documents should reflect the name of the Maintenance Funds (174) as the "Land Management Trust Fun(T as defined in the Ordinance governing the Program. • Some Preserves may require minimal expenditures for amenities because they may be deemed accessible in their natural State. • The budget projections do not include Grants which may be awarded to the Program. Mr. Delate moved for Stuff to place an item on a regular meeting Agenda (or Workshop) far the Committee to designate and prioritize the proposed capital improvements (amenities) for the various Preserves. The individual Final Management Plans for the individual Preserves to he utilized av a guideline for the improvements proposed for each Preserve. Second by .Wr. Pires. Carried unanimously 8 -0. It was noted the Lands Evaluation and Management Subcommittee has prepared a drafl amenities list which Should be reviewed by the bill Committee during the prioritization process, In addition, Staff should provide any backup cost estimates available for proposed amenities already under consideration (Gordon River Greemvay Project, etc.) Alex Sulecki requested Committee direction on the concept of accepting new applications for Cycle 9, The Committee determined new applications may be accepted, however Staff notify the applicants on the status of the Pro.-rum. D. Discussion regarding proposed staff recommendations to BCC: :Alex Solecki provided a copy of the F.XeCLtive SummarN "Budgei Shorts ll Projection and rich °isoty Comma tee Sunset Provision ° dated December 13, 2010 outlining the following Staff recommendations: • Immediately suspend all acquisitions. including those Unit 53 and Winchester I lead parcels that are under contract and waiting for Board approval. • Prepare a final recommended Active Acquisition Gist as a contingency plan if the economy or circumstances change. • Report to the Board in January 2011, present a final recommended acquisition list and request direction regarding the sun setting of the CCLAAC. • CCLAAC and staff prepare a prioritization of public amenities at each preserve for recommendation to the Board. Discussion occurred on the rationale for the recommendations. 161 1 9 January 10, 2011 Mr. Pires moved for the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee to recommend the follorving actions: • Immediately suspend all acquisitions, exceptfor parcels in Unit 53 and Winchester Head including those under contract and waiting Board approval. • Staff prepares a recommended Active Acquisition List • If required in the Conservation Collier Ordinance, report to the Board in January 2011. • CCLAAC and Staff prepare a prioritization q f public amenities at each preserve for recommendation to the Board (of County Commissioners). Second by Mr. Curt. Carried unanimously 8 -0. Staff requested direction on the issue of sun setting the CCLAAC. It was noted Section 8 of the Conservation Collier Ordinance states "at such times there are insufficient uncommitted funds in the acquisition trust fund, to include another acquisition and all acquisition projects have been closed, the acquisition committee shall report to the Board of County Commissioners that its business has concluded." Committee members and Staff agreed recommending the BCC sun set the CCLAAC is premature given the status of the Program. More discussion is necessary. Mark Isackson, Director of Corporate Finance, noted on January 28, 2011, the Finance Committee is reviewing the possibility of early paying the Conservation Collier 2008 bond. E. Gordon River Greenway Project — Update Alex Solecki reported Staff has notified Consultants they will not be accepting change orders for costs and a requested they provide a new timetable for the project. The Committee will be updated on the timetable next month. There will be a Stakeholders meeting on January 14, 2011. Ellie Krier requested and outlined her proposed changes to the minutes of the December 13, 2010 meeting previously approved under item IV. Mr. Delate moved to revise the minutes of the December 13, 2010 meeting as follows: • Page 40, paragraph 8/1 from `Ellie Krier, Southwest Florida Land Preservation Trust recommended the Committee postpone the item until their organization can complete polling data on public opinion of the Program." to "Ellie Krier recommender! the Committee postpone the item until public polling data on the.status of the Program can be completed." • Page 5, paragraph 1, line 4 -5 — from "...Conservancy meets with Southwest Florida Land Preservation Trust on the concept of the public 16 1 1 A9 January 10, 201 1 polling recommended by Ms. Krier.° to Conservancy reviews the concept of the public polling recommended by Ms. Krier." Second by Mr. Pires. Carrier! unanimously 8 -0. Speaker Effie Krier, Southwest Florida Land Preservation Trust reported tine website for the Gordon River Greenway will be launched on March 16, 2011 in conjunction with the Economic Development Council`s "Project hrriovotion" event which showcases the Greenway project as an example of collaborative efforts within a contmunitti, F. Preserve Ordinance - Update Alex Solecki noted Staff is meeting with the Parks and Recreation and Transportation Department Staff to prepare a draft of 'he Ordinance. The draft. when completed will be submitted to the Ordinance Policy and Procedures Subcommittee for review. Vl. New Business A. land Acquisition Advisory Committee Member Applications (41 days to make recommendations) Alex Sulecki provided a copy of Memorandum from tan Mitchell, Executive Manager, Board of County Commissioners - "Re. Land Acqui.sitionAdviscny Committee idenlify'ing -t applicants (Anthony P ;res, Jr . Tracey Dewrell, William H. Poteet, Jr and jejfera, Curl) ' The requested the Committee provides a recommendation to the I3CC for the appointment of members to the CCLAAC. Mr. Delate reported lie will be resigning loom the Committee. Mr. Delate moved to reconnnend to the Board ofCounty Commissioners Mr. Pires, Mr. Poteet and Mr. Curt be re- appointed to the Conservation Collier Land Aequi.sition Advisory Committee. Second by Ms. Karim. Carried unanimously 8 -0. V11. Outstanding Advisory Committee Member Program Chairman Poteet nominated Anthony Pires as an `Out.standing.,ldvisory Committee Member. " Alex Solecki read the application into the record. Mr. Delate move to recommend the StaffAdvismy Committee recognize Mr. Pires as an "Outstanding Committee Member. " .Second by d1r. Sterk. Carried unanimously 8 -0. Vill. Coordinator Communications Alex Solecki reported: • She attended the January 7, 2011 Environmental Advisory Council meeting where the adoption hearing for the Immokalee Area Master Plan was 161 1 A9 January 10, 2011 heard. ,A portion of Pepper Ranch is within the geographic area governed by the proposed plan. To date, the Plan does not restrict the uses anticipated on the Pepper Ranch property. She will continue to monitor the Plan and Report to the Committee as necessary. Staff is participating in a review of the proposed County Watershed Management Plan. Pepper Ranch visitation continues to increase including use by an Equestrian Club. Staff received a $75,000 matching grant from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission for exotic removal. Staff is coordinating with Collier County TV for a program highlighting Pepper Ranch and other Preserves within the Program. The Committee recommended: • Staff review the land use application for the Alico, Inc. mining and/or excavation project located in the vicinity of Caracara Preserve. • Staff investigates the concept of utilizing the County's Utility Department billing delivery system to provide information to the public on the Preserves. • Staff investigates the feasibility of adding it link for the Conservation Collier Program on the "Watchable Wildlife" link of the Collier County Government website. IX. Subcommittee Composition Ales Solecki presented the document "Conservation CollierSubcomrnirtees —March 2010" for review. The Committee requested no changes to the membership of the Subcommittees. Mr. Pires moved to approve the composition of the Subcommittees as presented. Second by Mr. Delate. Carried unanimously 8 -0. X. Sub - Committee Meeting Reports A. Outreach — Tony Pires, Chair None B. Lands Evaluation and Management — Mike Delate, Chair None C. Ordinance Policy and Procedures — Annisa Karim, Chair None XI. Chair Committee Member Comments Chairman Poteet recognized outgoing member Michael Delate and his service to the Committee, XII. Public General Comments None XIII. Staff Comments None 1611 A9 January 10, 201 1 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 10:45A.M. Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Bill, Potect chai h- 'rhese minutes approved by the Boatd, Committee on as presented or as amended 8 R,F,(.-,E9VED DEC 13 2010 p, „err. It `,o ,,yy 1)ommissioners Fiala ' Mey+ Henning Coyle Coletta — -- J Naples, Florida, September 15, 2010 1611 A LET IT BE KNOWN that the LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD met on this date in regular ,1 a session at 10:00 a.m. in the Main Library with the following members present: CHAIR: Doris J. Lewis VICE - CHAIR: Loretta Murray Carla Grieve Rochelle Lieb Connie Bettinger - Hennink ALSO PRESENT: Marilyn Matthes, Library Director Roberta Reiss, Literacy Coordinator Judith Kraycik, Administrative Assistant APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mrs. Lewis asked for comments or corrections to the minutes of August 18, 2010. A question was raised concerning how corrections to the minutes are currently being handled. Mrs. Matthes responded that the corrections are noted on the minutes that are signed by the chair. It was suggested that the corrections be made to the minutes and then submitted to the chair for signature. All members of the Board supported this suggestion. In addition, Mrs. Lich suggested that if the changes to the minutes were significant they should be listed in the minutes. A few minor adjustments were requested and noted. Mrs. Bettinger- Hennick moved to approve the minutes with corrections, seconded by Mrs. Murray and the motion was carried unanimously that the minutes be approved with corrections as noted. LITERACY PROGRAM REPORT Mrs. Riess reported the focus for the summer was on recruiting for the conversation classes that had a summer break and resumed yesterday, September 14. The program was quite successful for the adult class. Staff is making inquiries as to how the attendees are learning about the program. In addition, the library is interested in strengthening their relationship with the literacy volunteers of Collier County who have a number of tutors working throughout the County. As a result, she has spent time meeting with them and a referral system has been developed where they would promote the library's conversation classes and the library in turn would refer anyone interested in being a literacy volunteer or who need a tutor to them. Mrs. Riess reported that the School on Wheels program with Guadalupe Social Services, headquartered in Immokalee, has engaged a new executive director who is a full time volunteer. Her name is Kristina O'Hem who is very enthusiastic about learning about the program. She is also very committed to working with the students at Ave Maria who receive training and then tutor the stay at home mothers in Immokalee. Ms. O'Hem's intention is to hold three trainings per year and Mrs. Reiss has told her that she would assist her with these trainings to be held at the Ave Maria Campus. In addition, Mrs. Reiss stated that some time ago, as part of the program, a group of residents from North Naples received training at the Library and then traveled to Immokalee to do tutoring. She would like to reinvigorate this portion of the progppftbe she feels that this would enhance the presence of the Library in these areas. Date: I Item S:�i 161 1 A10 Mrs. Reiss also reported that she is in the planning stages of the People in Stories program at Edison State College. Her contact at the school is interested in proceeding with this for next semester for her remedial English classes. REPORT OF OFFICERS — None COMMUNICATIONS Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink stated she read a letter to the editor of Naples Daily News concerning an incident at Headquarters Library involving a patron who fell. She asked if the fall was related to the pavers that were replaced. Mrs. Matthes stated it was not. However, the County Risk Management Department has looked into the situation and has provided information to the insurance company. Mrs. Matthes said there may be further communications concerning this incident from another patron who has taken an interest in this issue and has also voiced complaints to her about other concerns of his. Mrs. Matthes commented that Library staff responded to the incident and were very helpful to the patron and insisted that EMS be called. Regarding the courtyard entrance to Headquarters Library, Mrs. Matthes stated additional changes are planned. Also, it is possible that Facilities Management may have funds for ADA improvements and may concrete the walkways to insure that solid concrete walks are provided everywhere. She added that she has looked into providing more handicapped parking closer to the building but currently that is not feasible due to the design. Mrs. Murray stated that the gentleman who sits at the Naples Regional Library and draws was the subject of an article in the Collier Citizen. Mrs. Lieb stated she had a personal communication asking how a beautiful facility like the South Regional Library could be built in these hard economic times. She said she responded that the plans had been finalized and the funds had been provided prior to the economic downfall. Mrs. Matthes verified that was true and added that once the building was completed the opening was delayed due to operational funding. Mrs. Lieb asked if other inquiries of this nature have been received by anyone else and if there may be a need to provide this information to the public. Mrs. Matthis stated she is available to answer any questions regarding this or similar concerns. She also stated that activity at the South Regional Library has increased probably because of the opening of the Santa Barbara Extension. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Employee of the Month — September The Board reviewed the nominations submitted for selection of the Library's Employee of the Month. Mrs. Lich stated that she was very impressed with Julia Clark. Mrs. Bettinger- Hennink moved to select Julia Clark as EOM for September. Mrs. Lewis seconded the motion and all in favor. It was asked if the recipient receives any recognition to which Mrs. Matthes responded that something will be provided to each library to post for staff and for the public as well. Unattended children in library policy Mrs. Matthes provided the Board with suggested guidelines for both parents and staff regarding this subject. She compiled this information from research she did on how other libraries are handling this issue. She stated she is not suggesting that this is what should become policy. 161 1 Alp Additional information from other libraries regarding this issue was also provided. Mrs. Matthes encouraged the Board to review this information. Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink stated that she does not support leaving a child unattended in a library. However, she does feel an age limit is necessary. Mrs. Matthes stated that it is her observation that most libraries do not have definite age limits except for children under the age of six. The focus seems to be more on the behavior of the child. The Children's Librarians have not yet met and discussed this subject but that should happen next week. She is not looking for a decision now but she would like a sense for what direction the library should take in this matter. The question is whether the policy should state a definite age that a child would be allowed to be in the library alone or should the policy state that if a child is responsibly using the library the age would not be an issue unless they were pre - school. The question was raised whether there is a liability issue here. Mrs. Matthes responded that research of the Florida Statutes was done and there was nothing addressing this issue. She added that the Library is a public building to which everyone has access. There was a discussion regarding the safety of children at the Library because of laws regarding convicted criminals' proximity to schools which concluded with Mrs. Matthes staring that when inappropriate behavior is observed by library staff of an adult toward a child the proper authorities are notified. Mrs. Matthes also stated that if no age limits are specified then the parents or caregivers are responsible for the safety of the child. She added that she would summarize this discussion for the meeting of the Children's Librarians. She asked that if there are any additional suggestions or comments, they should be e- mailed to her. Floating collections update Mrs. Matthes stated that two collections will be floated which will be the large print books and the audio book collection. The date for implementation has yet to be decided. However, in preparation for this, the library will be discarding the audio cassette collection. It has not been definitely decided how the cassettes will be disposed of. Mrs. Matthes commented that it is usually problematic when phasing out a collection because there are always people who still want to use it. Circulation Mrs. Matthes distributed a copy of the circulation figures as of August 2010 as compared to August 2009. These figures indicated that circulation for August was down by approximately 5,700 items and year-to -date circulation is down by approximately 66,000. Mrs. Matthes stated it is unlikely that circulation for September will be such that we would exceed the circulation for 2009. A discussion took place regarding possible reasons for this decrease. Mrs. Lieb asked if Mrs. Matthes is concerned about the figures. Mrs. Matthes responded that she is disappointed but not surprised due to the reasons as discussed. NEW BUSINESS Mrs. Bettinger- Hennink reported that a mural was proposed for the Childrens' section of Golden Gate Estates Library to be donated by community organizations. An artist was contracted and The Friends of the Library have initially provided the funds for the mural. Any community organizations who subsequently donate money to this project, those funds will be returned to the Friends of the Library. Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink complimented whoever is posting information on twitter for the Library. She said they are doing an excellent job. The comments are short, informative and to the point. Mrs. Matthes stated that Joy White is posting the twitter information. lb Q A10 Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink stated she learned that during the summer many children from Lee County spend a great deal of time in Golden Gate Estates and make use of the Library facilities. These children do not have library cards for Lee or Collier County. With the new policy going into effect on October 1 whereby patrons who do not have library cards will be charged for computer use, this could pose a problem next summer. She is questioning whether something should be done to communicate this information to the public before next summer. Several suggestions were made but no action was taken at this time. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS — None Mrs. Matthes provided the Board with a draft of the new Computer Use Agreement for the Library and also a draft of FAQs which will be provided to staff to aid in the implementation of this policy. The new policy will be effective on October 1, 2010, and states that anyone who does not have a valid library card and wishes to access a library computer will be required to purchase a guest pass for $5 for 30 minutes of computer time. The main issue with the new policy is that guest passes will not be refundable. If for some reason the patron cannot gain access to the computer, another guest pass will be provided. Mrs. Matthes also reported that new software will be installed on the library computers that will allow patrons to utilize the computers for more than 90 minutes per day, which is the current policy. However, this use will be subject to availability and will be provided in 30 minute sessions. The purpose of this change is to ensure the best utilization of the computers. A question was raised regarding the use of USB devices. Mrs. Matthes answered they can be used but not all of them work on all computers. If this happens, another guest pass will be provided free of charge to use on a different computer where the USB will work. Mrs. Matthes stated it is difficult to set up policies that have no exceptions. Therefore, exceptions will be made on a case by case basis. Branch managers have been told that they will have the authority to grant exceptions but the reason for the exception must be explained. Mrs. Greive asked if there is going to be a press release notifying the public of this change. Mrs. Matthes stated that there should be. Mrs. Matthes also stated that posters are being prepared to place in the libraries with notification of this change. Staff has also been telling patrons that they will need their library card or they will be charged. Mrs. Matthes also provided the Board with a copy of the 2011 Action Plan that was be sent to the Board of County Commissioners for approval. This is a requirement for state aid. Mrs. Matthes reported the annual update inventory report will be presented to the Planning Commission on Monday. This report specifies how many square feet the library has, how many books per capita we have and the cost for maintaining the level of service for the next five years. Mrs. Matthes stated that currently the Library has advertised three positions to replace employees who have resigned. One is for the children's area in Immokalee, a part-time employee at Headquarters and a reference Librarian at Naples Regional. REPORT OF THE FRIENDS Mrs. Greive stated the local author program will be going before the executive committee. As a result, she has no new information on this item. 4 1611A10 Mrs. Greive reported that changes to the by -laws are still being discussed. One of the issues is term limits for Board members with some members do support limits and others do not. Additionally, there will be a full audit in preparation for grant applications. The organization is becoming more involved with local book clubs. Also, one -time lectures are being considered. These would be a scaled down version and would not be part of a series and would not include lunch. Mrs. Greive stated the Members Appreciation Night will be held at Headquarters Library on January 14, 2011. Mrs. Greive stated the Friends will be developing a strategic five year plan. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Library Advisory Board, Mrs. Lieb moved to adjourn, seconded by Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink and carried unanimously the meeting was adjourned at 11:53 a.m. j V Approved by: Doris J. Lewis Chair, Library Advisory Board ,evEd Fiala ,111c1'' DEC 13 2010 Coyle Henning � �; misstoners COMB 4nyr�t of r9ilfiCy Rtr+ Coletta _ Naples, Florida, October 13, 2010 l� \lQ LET IT BE KNOWN that the LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD met on this date in regul1 6 I 1 A 1 0 session at 10:00 a.m. in the Main Library with the following members present: CHAIR: Doris J. Lewis VICE - CHAIR: Loretta Murray Carla Grieve Rochelle Lich Connie Bettmger-Hennink ALSO PRESENT: Marilyn Matthes, Library Director Roberta Reiss, Literacy Coordinator Judith Kraycik, Administrative Assistant APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mrs. Lewis asked for comments or corrections to the minutes of September 15, 2010. Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink stated that her name was misspelled in the minutes. Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink moved to approve the minutes with corrections, seconded by Mrs. Grieve and the motion was canned unanimously that the minutes be approved with corrections as noted. LITERACY PROGRAM REPORT Mrs. Riess reported that the training has been completed for the volunteers at Ave Maria who will be tutoring the women in Immokalee. Six women attended the training. Another training is planned in the next couple of months. Mrs. Riess stated that she has been working with the volunteer coordinator at Ave Maria who is in charge of all of the volunteer opportunities for the students at the University. The space that was used for the training of the volunteer tutors was arranged by the volunteer coordinator. The University is trying to make the students aware of Immokalee and the issues and challenges of that community. Many students may think that volunteer opportunities are only available outside of this country. However, Immokalee is within a close proximity to the University and is in need of many special services that could be handled by volunteers. The volunteer coordinator is trying to provide a link between the University and the community. One of the problems encountered by the program is the lack of transportation for the students to Immokalee. The School on Wheels program has been assisting by providing their van to transport the students to Immokalee. Mrs. Reiss reported that the conversation class at South Regional Library has been going very well. Several previous participants returned and there are several new attendees who were referred to the program by Literacy Volunteers. She is making an effort to stay in touch with this organization so they can feel free to refer students to our programs. Mrs. Reiss also makes referrals to the organization when she receives requests for one -on -one tutoring. REPORT OF OFFICERS — None COMMUNICATIONS Mrs. Lieb stated that she had an inquiry from someone who is interested in servin , on the Library Advisory Board when a vacancy becomes available. Mrs. Grieve asked if it is p l9gMve OeN: Item nI fi5: 1611A10 more members on the Board because she noticed that the Productivity Committee has more than one member per district. Mrs. Matthes responded that the ordinance providing for a Library Advisory Board states there is one member per district. As the Productivity Committee is a committee, the same rules do not apply. Mrs. Lewis stated that she inquired at the Naples Reqional Library how the newly implemented program of charging for computer time is going. She was told and observed that the computer area was quite empty. The employee stated that much of the computer usage was by residents from St. Matthews House and even though they had been told during the summer that they needed to obtain library cards in order to continue to use the computers free of charge, they had not done this. Mrs. Gceive asked how these people could obtain a library card because they do not have a permanent address. Mrs. Matthes stated arrangements have been made with St. Matthews house who will provide a letter to the person who can then present it to the library in order to obtain a library card. Other than that, the employee stated the program is going well and residents are quite supportive. Mrs. Matthes stated that staff has reported to her that the program is going well and has resulted in the issuance of more library cards. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Employee of the Month — September and October Mrs. Matthes stated that unfortunately the employee who was selected as Employee of the Month for September submitted her resignation prior to the notification that she was to receive the award. As a result, Mrs. Matthes is requesting that the Board select a different recipient for the September award as well as a recipient for October. Mrs. Murray stated that she is impressed with Rosalinda Silva - Ramirez because it appears she goes way beyond what is expected of her. Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink moved to select Rosalinda Silva - Ramirez as employee of the month for October, Mrs. Grieve seconded the motion and all in favor. Mrs. Grieve nominated Anna Karras as employee of the month for September. Mrs. Bettinger- Hennink seconded the motion and all in favor. Possible marketing program Mrs. Grieve stated that she noticed that one of the nominees for employee of the month has been called upon to assist the marketing team and make suggestions to expedite the initiative. Mrs. Grieve said she was unaware there was a marketing team but thinks it is a great idea. She suggested that a presentation could be developed describing all of the programs available at the library that many residents do not know exist. The presentation could be offered to various groups throughout the County. Mrs. Matthes added that the library has also contributed to many organizations' newsletters marketing the various programs available. Mrs. Grieve commented that presentations would be a terrific idea to promote the library. Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink stated that she has attended a number of group meetings where library representatives spoke regarding library programs and events. Mrs. Matthes stated that all the library programs and events can be found on the library website and also they appear on Twitter. The marketing committee also prepares the press releases for the various programs and events. Mrs. Grieve asked how many employees make up the committee. Mrs. Matthes stated that there are five. Advertisements for events held at the Library 1611 A10 Mrs. Lieb stated she saw an advertisement in the newspaper regarding an upcoming presentation to be held at the library by a commercial enterprise. Her concern is that it may appear that the Library is endorsing the company. Mrs. Matthes stated that she had received calls from a few members of the medical community who stated this concern as well. However, the library is open for rent to commercial establishments and you cannot choose who you will allow to use the facility. Mrs. Lieb stated she just wants to make sure there is a disclaimer published with the advertisements. Mrs. Matthes responded that she has been communicating with this company to ensure the disclaimer is printed. Mrs. Lieb asked if the library must be open when the evem/program is held. Mrs. Matthes stated that yes, the program must be held during regular library operating hours. The question was raised whether the library rates are comparable to other facilities within Collier County to which Mrs. Matthes stated they are. Mrs. Lieb stated her concern is that the disclaimer be large enough to be noticeable. Mrs. Grieve stated that some entities specifically state the size of the disclaimer. Mrs. Matthes stated that is not part of the present policy but may be something that should be addressed. Unattended children in library policy Mrs. Matthes provided a draft of a policy addressing this concern. Mrs. Matthes stated that Florida does not address any specific age for allowing children to be left alone. The Children' Librarians would like to maintain the age of 12 as the minimum. She also pointed out that she changed the wording to state `the Library recommends' to provide for some discretion. After a brief discussion, the members decided to eliminate the sentence which stated that children eight years of age and older may use the Library on their own because this is previously inferred when referring to children through the age of seven (7). Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink asked about the library cards with the red stripe which are issued to children. Mrs. Matthes responded that those cards are issued to children under the age of 18 to prevent the rental of R- rated DVD's. Mrs. Lich asked at what age a child can obtain a library card. Mrs. Matthes stated essentially at birth. Mrs. Lieb asked if there was a way to control library access through the issuance of library cards. Currently there are only red cards for children under 18 and green cards for adults. Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink asked if any contact information is maintained for children who have their own library cards. Mrs. Matthes stated that whatever information was provided when the card was issued is used as contact information. Mrs. Matthes added that in many cases it is difficult to obtain the card from the child. Mrs. Lewis asked if unattended children in the library is an ongoing problem. Mrs. Matthes stated that there have been some incidents where staff has enforced the rules and the parents objected. As a result, the intention is to provide a compromise that can be enforced without excluding certain groups. The responsibility for children after they leave library property was also discussed. Mrs. Matthes stated the policy would need to be reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office before it could be put into place. Mrs. Matthes asked if the concept of the policy draft is acceptable to the committee. All agreed that it is. Mrs. Matthes also addressed the issue of children from other areas spending time at the Library during the summer but do not have library cards. She reported that staff did not seem to think this was a major issue. Circulation Mrs. Matthes distributed a copy of the circulation figures for fiscal year 2010 which shows a decline from 2009. She stated that she had notified the County that this would probably happen due to the reduction in hours and changes to circulation periods. This is the first full year for these changes. In addition, the Library has not been purchasing as many bestsellers as in the past. This is due to funding constraints in staffing to handle the purchases and subsequent duties related to stocking of the books. Mrs. Grieve asked if donations of bestsellers should possibly be encouraged. Mrs. Matthes responded that would be a good idea but staff is still required to 1611A10 process the receipt of the books. The Library does have volunteers who have helped with the process. Mrs. Matthes stated that the Children's Library has been experiencing an increase of field trips from the schools. Mrs. Matthes also stated that sometime in the near future she will compile the circulation numbers by media type. There was a brief discussion regarding the fluctuation of circulation numbers from month to month and reasons that may cause this. NEW BUSINESS —None GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS — None DIRECTOR'S REPORT Mrs. Matthes stated that she had a complaint from a patron who stated a bed bug had been in a book she got from the Library. Mrs. Matthes asked for the patron to return the book which she did. Mrs. Matthes checked the shelf where the book had been and there was no evidence of any bugs. She also called the pest control company that is used by the County and had them come to the Library and check it for any bugs. She was told they could find no evidence of any bugs. She said she intends to call the patron and tell her the results of the investigation. In addition, this patron had previously caused a disturbance in the Library about a different issue. Mrs. Lewis stated that eventually the Library should do something about cleanliness. Mrs. Matthes stated she has spoken to patrons in the past regarding hygiene issues. Mrs. Matthes reported that she has had a request from an outside vendor to open a coffee shop in the Library. However, she learned that they fry bignet's on site and the odor may cause problems. In addition, the Risk Management Department is against having any frying done on the premises. As a result, the request will most likely not be approved. Mrs. Matthes provided a drawing of the renovation of the courtyard and new fountain. Unfortunately, the larger fountain she had hoped to have constructed is not affordable and a smaller fountain will be built. This newer version will be easier to install and more economical to operate. Mrs. Matthes stated that hopefully the old fountain can be saved and used at the Golden Gate Senior Resource Center. Mrs. Grieve asked if the timetable for the project has changed. Mrs_ Matthes responded it has not and it is still scheduled to be completed by mid January. Mrs. Matthes reported that Headquarters Library lost a reference librarian. However, the position has been advertised. Currently interviews are being conducted for a reference librarian position for Naples Regional which has been vacant since August. The County is allowing vacated positions to be filled if the position is fully funded for fiscal year 2011. The Library has been approved to hire seasonal positions which will be advertised in the very near future. The positions are for the period from December 15 through April 15. Mrs. Matthes stated that the program to charge for computer use is going very well. She was not aware of the problem with St. Matthews house but will look into it and make sure that letters are being provided to the residents there so they may obtain library cards at no charge. Mrs. Matthes reported that she attended the Library Directors Conference. The state library conducted a survey of broadband connections or internal connections fora number of libraries which included our library. She has received the results of the survey which she may use to write a services and technology grant which will be due in March. She has completed the research but has yet to make a decision on the specific project she would like to undertake that is related to technology. 1611 A10 grant which will be due in March. She has completed the research but has yet to make a decision on the specific project she would like to undertake that is related to technology. The question was raised regarding the phasing out of cassettes and how that is going to be accomplished. Mrs. Matthes confirmed that the cassettes are going to be disposed of in some manner. A number of them will be available at the annual book sale. In addition, some of the cassettes will be temporarily housed at Lighthouse, a services center of the blind. REPORT OF THE FRIENDS Mrs. Grieve reported that on November 5" the Friends will hold their annual Red, White and Roulette event. There will be reduced admission fees for Friends of the Library members as well as for library staff. In December, she will be attending a Library Association meeting with Linda Fasulo which is to be held in Ft. Myers. She stated she has attended this function in the past and found it very worthwhile. Mrs. Matthes asked Mrs. Grieve to provide her with information on the meeting with the possibility of sending a staff member. Mrs. Grieve stated she will provide information on the meeting to everyone. Mrs. Bettinger - Hennink commented that the calendars being sold by Friends of the Library are very nice. Mrs. Grieve stated they are encouraging members to receive their newsletter electronically. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Library Advisory Board, Mrs. Grieve moved to adjourn, seconded by Mrs. Bettinger- Hennink and carried unanimously the meeting was adjourned at 11:28 a.m. 1 , Approved by Doris J. Lewis Chair, Library Advisory Board Parks & Recreation Advisory Board M September 15, 2010 - 2:00 PM North CZ Regip Facility Showcase Award for Freedom Park - Marla, Barry, Manager and Supervisors will present on September 2nd to receive the award in Orlando at the Florida Recreation and Park Association State Conference i U 6 14 I VED rk Exhibit HWV 2 3 2010 ;,,aro of county commissioners Agency Excellence Award - Collier County Parks and Recreation To be awarded September 2nd in Orlando to Marla, Barry, Managers and Supervisors I. Call to Order VII. II. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of August 18, 2010 Minutes VIII V. New Business a) Employee of the Month for August - IX. Chairman Ribes b) Request for Art Shows (Arts in HD) in the Parks- Heidi Saletko & Dennis Goodman X. c) Recommendation to Amend the Barefoot Beach Preserve Ordinance to Include XI. Conservation Collier - Alex Sulecki XII. VI. Old Business a) Parks Master Plan - Sidney Kittila XIII. b) 2010 Annual Update Inventory Report XIV. - Sidney Kittila XV. co" Marketing Highlights - Review of Website Peg Ruby Recreation Highlights - FRPA Conference Shari, Kerry and Annie Capital Project Highlights - Project Review Tony Ruberto Turf & Irrigation Update - Rick Garby Adopt A Park - David Saletko Director's Highlights - Barry Williams Informational Items Public Comments /Board Member Comments Adjournment Misc. Corres: Deb: (J 3 a l Nrnt i :;"nies to Parks & Recreation Advisory Board 101eeA 6 11 October 20, 2010 - 2:00 PM North Collier Regional Park - Exhibit Hall O C T O 8 E R 2, 2 0 1 0 'lanet Team' and Hospitality Division did an amazing job. This is their second cleanup at Barefoot. They provided free breakfast of fruit and cheese tamale, banana and Mexican hot chocolate! Everything was recyclable, reusable or compostable and the linens and silverware were collected after use and retumed to the hotel to be cleaned. The event's organizer from Guest Services was Nadya Uygun and we thank her for rounding up the troops! Meryl Rorer, Volunteer Coordinator for Parks and Recreation assisted with the event. Thanks to our friends at Barefoot Beach for all that you do preserving the envirnomental integrity of this beautiful beach. C M! I. Call to Order VI. Old Business a) Long Term Options for TDC Funding - II. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation Jack Wert b) TDC Funding Options - Gary McAlpin III. Approval of Agenda c) Promotional Issues Utilizing Athletic Fields - Barry Williams IV. Approval of September 15, 2010 Minutes VII. Marketing Highlights - Holloween Events - V. New Business Peg Ruby a) Employee of the Month for August and VIII. Recreation Highlights - BMX Races - September - Chairman Ribes Ray Coriano and Annie Alvarez b) Recommendation and Approval for the International Festival to Sell Alcohol at IX. Adopt A Park - Kerry Geroy Sugden Park - Jim Gaitens c) Recommendation and Approval for Tigertail X. Director's Highlights - Barry Williams Concessionaire to Sell Alcohol at Tigertail Beach - Tony Smith XI. Informational Items d) Standards for Background checks for XII. Public Comments /Board Comments Volunteers - Meryl Rorer XIII. Adjournment e) Bluebill Road Beach Access Improvements - Gary McAlpin CAPRA� J1yI' iFiaalla_ 16 1 1411 II` I V v 44sla5 Henning i August 18, 2010 Coyle Coletta MINUTES O MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Naples, Florida, August 18, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 2:00 P.M. at North Collier Regional Park Exhibit Hall, 15000 Livingston Road, Naples Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: John P. Ribes VICE CHAIR: Edward "Ski" Olesky Barbara Buehler (Excused) Phil Brougham Kerry Geroy (Excused) David Saletko William Shafer (Excused) V RECEIVEC NOV 2 3 2010 ALSO PRESENT: Barry Williams, Parks & Recreation Director Kerry Runyon, Regional Manager III Nancy Olson, Regional Manager I Jack Wert, Tourism Development Director Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Mgmt. Director Jeanine McPherson - Hogle, Veterans Park Supry Tona Nelson, Administrative Assistant Sidney Kittila, Operations Coordinator Shari Ferguson, Regional Manager Derek Renauld, Golden Gate Misc. Cartes: Joe Boney, Immokalee Dab: bm f. Copies b: 1611 All August 18, 2010 I. Call to Order John Ribes called the meeting to order at 2:04 pm. A quorum was not established. II. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation The Pledge of Allegiance was recited and Invocation was held. III. Approval of Agenda — Discussed after V d. IV. Approval of June 16, 2010 Minutes — Discussed after V. d. V. New Business a. Employee of the Month for June and July Sidney Kittila announced the Employee of the Month for June and July 2010. John Ribes commended and presented the following outstanding individuals with the "Employee of the Month" award. Y June - Derek Renauld, Golden Gate - July -Joe Boney, Immokalee b. Review of TDC Fund 183 Beach Park Facilities — Discussed after III. c. TDC Recommendation to use $1M from Fund 183 - Discussed after X. d. Joe Abrahams Leadership Class 2010 Project Shari Ferguson distributed and reviewed the Customer Survey May 2010 Results. (See attached) 1,000 surveys were sent to Parks and Recreation Customers. .John Ribes arrived at 2:15 pm. A quorum was established. She reported 230 customers responded. The Staff reviewed the survey results recommended: Devote more time to make public aware of activities. Y Revamp the website to make it more "user" friendly. y Advertise more. v Creating website "links" through other County departments and Community Groups. Y Collect entails via website. r More surveys to monitor results of changes. III. Approval of Agenda Phil Brougham moved to approve the Agenda as submitted Second by Edward "Ski: Olesky. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. 2 161 1AlI August 18, 2010 IV. Approval of June 16, 2010 Minutes David Saletko moved to approved the June 16, 2010 Minutes as submitted. Second by Edward "Ski. Olesky. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. V. New Business a. Employee of the Month for June and July — Discussed Previously b. Review of TDC Fund 183 Beach Park Facilities Discussed after V c. c. TDC Recommendation to use $1M from Fund 183 Gary McAlpin recommended the Advisory Board consider redirecting Beach Park Facility Funds to support the emergency marketing program. Ile stated there is an "Immediate Need" to advertise in a timely manner and beach park facilities are critical to the successful beach experience and memory visitors take away from Collier County. Gary McAlpin stated the Beach Park Facilities, Fund 183 receives approximately $2,000,000 per year to construct, refurbish and perform major maintenance for all beach park facilities. Funds accumulate in reserve until sufficient funds are available to complete a significant project. Approximately $4,000.000 is in reserves to fund major bathroom refurbishments and parking enhancements in the future. Ile stated the source of funds will be from Category "A: Tourist Development Tax Fund 18' ) and recommended the Advisory Board considers the following: • The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (P &RAB) and Coastal Advisory Committee (CAC) support a onetime re- allocation of $1,000,000 from the Beach Park Facilities Fund 183 to tourism to support the emergency marketing effort. • The P &RAB and CAC not support any re- allocation of funds that would have a detrimental effect on any existing County program or operation. • The P &RAB and CAC not support any permanent re- allocation of Tourist Development Council (TDC) funds from the existing allocation. • "fhe P &RAB and CAC support a comprehensive long term program that provides for sufficient funding to perform year round marketing of this destination that is consistent with other destinations that we are competing against. Gary McAlpin stated the P &RAB and CAC recommendations will be submitted to the BCC in September. 161 Aug st 18, 2 1 All It was noted the CAC has already approved the plan and the Museum Advisory Board approved a similar plan. b. Review of TDC Fund 183 Beach Park Facilities Jack Wert gave a slide presentation on the Tourism Promotional Assistance. He reported year -round tourism marketing and promotion is essential to attract new and repeat visitors. He stated visitors spend in Collier County and contribute to all tourist development tax uses. FY 2010 tourism invested an additional $1 M transferred from Beach Re- Nourishment Reserves with a return on the investment of $20.65 in new visitor spending during the first 6 months on each dollar invested. The following items were presented: i Beach Park Facilities Proposal How We Would Invest the Reallocated %1.0 Million r Return On Investment Report 2010 Campaigns Park Facilities Benefits The Next Steps Discussion ensued on the Advisory Boards concerns on redirecting funds and many questions were addressed by the Staff. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Coastal Advisory Committee support a onetime re- allocation of $1,000,000 from the Beach Park Facilities Fund 183 to tourism to support the emergency marketing effort. Second by David Saletko. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Coastal Advisory Committee not support any reallocation of funds that would have a detrimental effect on any existing County program or operation. Second by Phil Brougham. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Coastal Advisory Committee not support any permanent reallocation of Tourism Development Council from the existing allocation. Second by David Saletko. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Coastal Advisory Committee support of a comprehensive long term program through the adoption of one additional penny, bringing the total to 5 cents, the maximum allowed, of TDC Funds for destination marketing. Second by David Saletko. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. 4 16 t Al usA8101 VI. Old Business a. Parks Master Plan Sidney Kittila reported the revised Collier County Parks and Recreation Master Plan Scope of Optional Services. (See attached) She reported Tindale - Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) will prepare for, facilitate and document one Consensus Building Workshop (CBW) to gather input from participants relating to the preliminary needs identified for the Master Plan. 'fOA will provide the County with a sample letter inviting approximately 50 individuals to participate in the CBW. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan Consensus — Building Workshop will meet October 14. It was noted the Master Plan was in process and the concept would be presented to the Planning Commission in December. b. 2010 Annual Update Inventory Report Sidney Kittila reported the Staff made a decision to retain the "Level of Service" at: i, 1.2 per acre per 1000 people o- 2.9 per acre per 1000 people for regional It was noted in 5 years the County will be plus 72 acres if population stays the same. Barry Williams stated an Updated Summary Package will be provided to the Advisory Board at the September meeting. He noted the BCC can change the Level of Service any time. c. Fee Policy Revisions Barry Williams suggested the Advisory Board approve the revision and re- establishment of the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Facilities and Outdoor Areas License and Fee Policy in order to increase Boat Launch Facilities Fees from $5 to $8 at all Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Boat Launch and Marinas. FY 2011 Budgeted Revenues @ 46, 000 Launches r At 55 per launch - ,5230, 000 Al M per launch - 5368, 000 The Staff recommended pricing for boat ramp operations for revenues pay for operating expense by increasing the launch fee to $8 daily. Phil Brougham moved to increase Boat Launch Facilities Fees to $8 at all Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Parks and Marinas. 1611A11 August 18, 2010 Second by David Saletko. Motion carried 3 -1. Edward "Ski" Olesky abstained. VII. Marketing Highlights — Social Media Sites Shari Ferguson reported marketing on: • Facebook is currently at 103 friends • 'Twitter is currently at 31 friends • Facebook with Twitter are now linked to CC P &R website • Staff is currently working on getting "You Tube" setup. • R.E.A.L. Guide will be changed back to the 8 '/2 x 11 size. • Send Flyers to School encouraging students to use website and go paperless. • Project Star Scholarship Program is currently looking for sponsors. • Back to School Bash at the Sun -N -Fun Lagoon has been scheduled for August 21 and the 1" 100 participants will receive a free backpack. VIII. Recreation Highlights — Edgerrin and Javarris James Free Football Skills Camp Joe Boney and Michael Reyna gave a slide presentation and reported: • 947 participants registered for the Football Skills Camp. • Volunteer NFL players were present to drill players and autographed footballs. • The autographed footballs will be auctioned off at the Recreation Conference held in Orlando and proceeds go to the Recreation Fund. • A Backpack Giveaway was held - 800 Backpacks were donated. • 2000 children came for Backpack Giveaway. Rain checks were provided to the participants after backpack supply depleted. • The Camp was very successful and will become a yearly event named Miracle Summer Camp. IX. Capital Project Highlight - None X. Adopt a Park Jeanine McPherson -Hogle - Parks Supervisor reported on Veterans Community Park. Veterans Park Programs Park Grounds look well maintained. Y Soccer Field has recently re- opened after repairs. Sod has been replaced in some areas of the Rover Run Dog Park. Y Baseball infield is undergoing clay repairs. Major projects include a sidewalk to athletic fields and other spots where the paving has begun to erode. Y Park needs include the replacement of maintenance equipment, outdoor furniture, bleachers, trash receptacles and additional office space and storage through building expansion. 6 1,611 1 f August 18, 2010 Edward "Ski" Olesky reported on Immokalee Community Park. • The Park has alighting issue with some lights are not working at the basketball court and two lights out at South Park. • Overall the grounds looked great. • The floor in trailer is weak. Barry Williams recommended removing the trailer from the grounds. The Staff will report back on the lighting issues. XI. Director's Highlights Barry Williams announced the Goodland Boat Park opening August 20, 2010. XIL Informational Items The next meeting is scheduled for September 15 at North Collier Regional Park Exhibit Hall at 2:00 pm. XIII. Public Comments /Board Member Comments Phil Brougham asked Staff to give a status report on Port of the Islands Park. The Staff responded: Y The boat ramp "Don't go any further" sign has been installed. ➢ The boat wash station has not been made available at this time. Y A new gas pump was installed yesterday. Y The roof over the patio has been replaced and a fax has been installed. Edward "Ski" Olesky reported the front door of the lmmokalee Sports Complex needs to be repaired or replaced. John Ribes asked what the results were regarding the Vanderbilt Beach Restrooms. The Staff responded the outcome was positive and the TDC made a recommendation to the BCC for approval. The BCC approved plan to go forward. David Saletko suggested installing message boards at the beach parks to make visitors aware of programs and events. It was noted message boards are currently being utilized for that purpose at some of the parks. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 4:30 PM. COLLIER COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD 1611411 Chai ajJo n P. Ribes These Minutes were approved by the Committee /Board on �! �5 '�� _, as presented X _ or as amended 8 CCLAAC May 2010 161,1 All Agenda Item V.A.I. R Co er County Memorandum To: Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee ( CCLAAC) Members From: Alexandra Sulecki, Conservation Collier Program Coordinator Date: May 10, 2010 Subject: Agenda Item V.A.I. — Reasons to develop a County Preserve Ordinance When the first Conservation Collier preserve was opened to the public in 2006, there was discussion at the staff and subcommittee level of what use policies would apply on the preserve. At that time, staff determined there was a Parks and Recreation ordinance, Ordinance No. 76-48, which would be adequate for the time being to cover the basic use issues such as hours of operation, no littering, no removal of plants, etc. However, discussion began then regarding the future need to develop a preserve use ordinance that recognizes the unique nature and public use of preserve sites. Presently, Conservation Collier has seven preserves open to the public having potential to host multiple types of visitor use activities. At its April 23, 2010 public meeting, the Ordinance, Policy and Rules (OPR) Subcommittee there had discussion about the need for a preserve use ordinance. It was the wish of the OPR subcommittee to bring the following reasons to the general CCLAAC to request a recommendation from this Committee regarding development of a preserve use ordinance: • The potential for different types of activities from those conducted on County park properties, including but not limited to camping, vehicle use, hunting, allowance of leashed dogs on some larger properties, and existence of cattle leases. • Differing management goals focus from Parks and Recreation Department, i.e. management of lands for the preservation of environmental resources with recreational use as an ancillary and not primary goal. • Establishment of a schedule of operation for public visitation that takes into account seasonal accessibility of trails and the need to potentially close some areas periodically to accommodate land management operations such as prescribed fine and restoration projects. • Development of a framework policy and procedures for responding to requests for various recreational uses, which considers conservation management goals. • Obtaining Board authorization for a fee schedule and policies for certain types of uses, such as conservation related public events and, potentially, for private events such as weddings and family reunions. • Provision of appropriate penalties for violation of preserve rules. Facilities Management Department Administrative Services Division CCLAAC May 2010 co %r C Y9 my Memorandum 16 11 All Agenda Item V.A.I. To: Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (CCLAAC) Members From: Alexandra Sulecki, Conservation Collier Program Coordinator Date: May 10, 2010 Subject: Agenda Item V.A.I . — Reasons to develop a County Preserve Ordinance When the first Conservation Collier preserve was opened to the public in 2006, there was discussion at the staff and subcommittee level of what use policies would apply on the preserve. At that time, staff determined there was a Parks and Recreation ordinance, Ordinance No. 76 -48, which would be adequate for the time being to cover the basic use issues such as hours of operation, no littering, no removal of plants, etc. However, discussion began then regarding the future need to develop a preserve use ordinance that recognizes the unique nature and public use of preserve sites. Presently, Conservation Collier has seven preserves open to the public having potential to host multiple types of visitor use activities. At its April 23, 2010 public meeting, the Ordinance, Policy and Rules (OPR) Subcommittee there had discussion about the need for a preserve use ordinance. It was the wish of the OPR subcommittee to bring the following reasons to the general CCLAAC to request a recommendation from this Committee regarding development of a preserve use ordinance: • The potential for different types of activities from those conducted on County park properties, including but not limited to camping, vehicle use, hunting, allowance of leashed dogs on some larger properties, and existence of cattle leases. • Differing management goals focus from Parks and Recreation Department, i.e. management of lands for the preservation of environmental resources with recreational use as an ancillary and not primary goal. • Establishment of a schedule of operation for public visitation that takes into account seasonal accessibility of trails and the need to potentially close some areas periodically to accommodate land management operations such as prescribed fire and restoration projects. • Development of a framework policy and procedures for responding to requests for various recreational uses, which considers conservation management goals. • Obtaining Board authorization for a fee schedule and policies for certain types of uses, such as conservation related public events and, potentially, for private events such as weddings and family reunions. • Provision of appropriate penalties for violation of preserve rules. Facilities Management Department Administrative Services Division 161 1 All Collier County Parks and Recreation Capital Projects Update Sept. 13, 2010 306 XXXX Immokalee Hazard Mitigation Grant • Working on establishing project in conjunction with larger project with the county. • EZ Shutters is the low bidder -- project to begin 10 /10. XXXX Golden Gate Community Center Hazard Mitigation Grant • EZ Shutters is the low bidder - -- project to begin 10 /10. XXXX ARRA Funds • Project to start at ICP, Eagle Lakes and finish with Gulf Coast Little League Osprey Nest at Gulf Coast. • Change order for Eagle bakes going to the BOCC on 09/14/10. • Project to begin 07/10. 80026 Caxambas Conversion • Letter from NPS received completing the conversion, eligible for LWCF Marlene Foord notified. • Barry has corresponded with Linda Reeves. Linda indicated that "As Built" and public access needs to be communicated to the state, who in turn will report to NPS to close out conversion. Barry has spoken to Public Utilities about access to the site, and Real Property about acquiring necessary easements, both is positive to providing public access. • Q Grady Minor issued PO to complete site plan —work to begin 07/10. • Site Plan completed and to be reviewed by Staff. 80029 Barefoot Beach Oulparcel • Local vendor has contract -- installation by 08/10. 80042 Pulling Boat Park Pam McKie has submitted proposal- -will send back to Pam as a no go. 80065 Gordon River Greenway Park • Barry and Tony have met with Conservation Collier to establish parameters of walkway for continuity between the various projects of the greenway. Pathway size to be similar will work with Conservation Collier on surface materials meeting scheduled 06/10 with Conservation Collier on pervious concrete surfacing. • $IM commitment from the County to City with Conservation Collier funds requires it to be on county land for us to complete design. Ron Wallace with City has not responded to completion of design. 1- 161 1A11 • Stakeholders meeting held will hold quarterly meetings with Stakeholders, next meeting 08/26/10. • Weekly meetings with consultants will begin 09/10. • CAO has agreement between Conservancy, Zoo, and BOCC— reviewing with Real Estate Services. • Parks notified KH with the changes to submit a new scope that will reflect the shift from the north to the south parking node and maintenance area to the north. Change order of S25K pending. • KH has filed for rezone of the site. Rezone on hold until new scope is determined. • Tony, Margaret and KBH met with Airport Authority to determine interconnect at NW corner of property. KH consultant for Airport Authority to design other Airport project. • Anticipate SDP approval by 02/11. • K -H to file for Rezone and EIS week of 9/13/10 • 30% drawings to be approved by end of 9/10 80066 Bayview Park Playground- • BOCC approved conceptual plan —CZM will move forward for design, permitting, and construction. • Playground will be placed on hold until decision regarding expansion of boat trailer parking at Bayview is completed— Commissioner Fiala has requested update on elements that are placed in the playground. • Conceptual plan includes small footprint for playground. • Old playground removed. 80073 GG Com Park/Replace- • Contract awarded to Varian for basketball and tennis courts. • Work completed on 04/06/09. Completing close out documentation. • Received letter from manufacturers representatives Plexi Pave --will repair imperfections at immokalee Community Park and South Park by 07/10. • Purchase Order to Bradanna for drainage improvement has been issued. Work to stair by end of Sept. 2010 80075 Immokalee Sports Drainage- • Injection well is dug -- getting 300 gpm. Will install fence around injection well. • Kick off meeting on 06/10/10 with Hausinger's. • Hausinger's has mobilized and construction to begin 06/28/10. • Well screen and sand pack have been selected. Hausinger is placing the order for the well materials and when the well materials arrive will complete 08/10. • Will determine what type of warranty is available on the well. • Well to be completed by end of Sept. 2010 80086 Port of the Islands-- • Construction is completed. 16 I 1 All • BOCC approved mitigation funds to be paid from project and escrow to be billed —Surge Solutions has removed all contaminated soil and replaced with new fill and sod. • Awaiting installation of dispense b 10. • Facilities coordinating costs associated with mitigation -- awaiting final report from HSA. 80103 TNCP Resurface Parking Lot -- • Received and reviewing quotes from Better Roads — negotiating price will award bid by 07/10. • Will look to resurface Golden Gate Community Park with funds. • Purchase Order issued to Bonness on Sept. 3, 2010. Work to start at end of Sept. 2010 80104 Fencing Repairs -- • New Fence contractor has been selected. • Will bid out price on the decayed fencing in front of ENCP community center with plastic split rail by 07/10. • Will look at fencing at Aaron Lutz by 07/10. • Project issued for quotes on 9/10/10 80105 Golden Gate Community Park Regrade Fields -- • Regrade is completed, sod installed, rolled 01/30/10. Will program no later than summer ' 10. • Working with Turf and Irrigation establishing drainage between two softball fields to eliminate standing water. 80115 Pelican Bay Tennis awarded contract to EB Simmons— preconstruction meeting to be coordinated thru regional manager by 08/10. Construction to begin 09/10. 80127 Veterans Park Irrigation /Drainage • Stan C working with Davidson on completing ROW. CDES overviewed elevations submitted by neighboring development to determine connective action. Contractor for development of new medical center will lower grade to reduce standing water to 6" work is completed will evaluate during rainy season. • Need to fix pathways at Tennis Courts and existing pathways have received quotes from Better Roads and negotiating price. • Purchase Order issued to Bonness for the work. • Project to start by end of Sept. 2010. 80129 Vineyard's Park Improvements DEP will not fund FRDAP grant. • Issued PO to Latavish for re- design of IWF within the same footprint. • Project to begin design by 07/10 with construction fall 2010. • Review different option for the IWF with Consultant. 1611AlI 80146 Port of the Isles — Dry Storage--/ • Temporary fix with mean low tide occurred- -- signage installed warning of drop ✓ off. • l lave received bid from Q Grady Minor for structural design of boat ramp -90% design submitted. Approval from CDES. • Awaiting comments from FWC— anticipate response b 07/10. • Approval from SFWMD. • Approval from lJSACOE. • Begin construction by 11/10. • Project is being quoted by contractors. 80147 Security Cameras • Cameras at ENCP, Eagle Lakes, and Veterans -- installation completed. • Freedom Park cameras, timers, and local card access have been installed. 80148 Golden Gate Community Center • Bleachers have been ordered and will be installed by 08/10. • Finalizing electrical drawings for open field lighting and in front of stage with HAS NTP issued. 80149 Corkscrew Lake RoadAccess • Real Estate services is working on alternative plans for access with easement from Roberto Bolte. • Met with Aquagenics on 06/28/10 to receive quote to eradicate lake vegetation- - will spray lake by 07/10. • Connected with Bryan Paul for fair share of lake spraying -50 /50 cost share. • Aquagenixs completed the spraying of the Lake. 80150 Last Naples Community Park — Pavilions- • Shari to obtain quotes and work with Tony to install. • Will look at picnic tables around the soccer field but take into consideration gang issues. • Look at using money for resurfacing and resealing. 80152 Immokalee Sports Complex — Floor is completed and bleachers will be installed by 08/10. 80153 Electronic Entry Devices • Will convert monies to Dreamland restoration, awaiting sketch from staff to share with School Board Barry to follow up with Annie. Shifted $30K to mitigation credit with ENCP. 161 1 All I 80160 Freedom Park computers, internet set up and hook up with facilities to be completed by 09/10. 801701mmokalee Airport Park — • Q Grady Minor to receive permits from CDES. • SFWMD approved permit. • Received quotes — renegotiated with low bidder agreed price $95K to complete work. • Jack Queen is providing price for hydro- seed - -by 07/10. • NTP given to Bradanna Construction. • Site work should be completed by middle of Oct. 2010 80600 Exotics Removal— • Rain has delayed plantings in the preserve at NCRP will address when preserve is sufficiently dry. Will pursue plantings of littorals by 08/10. • Getting Quotes from Exotic Contractor for ENCP, Oaks Park, Veterans Park and Sugden Park. 346 80015 East Naples Community Park Soccer Fields- • Q Grady Minor provided letter to USACE with mitigation credit proof. • Jason Bires working with Q Grady Minor to complete deed restriction for conservation easement. • Waiting for final approval from ACOE. All mitigation has been paid and information was sent to ACOE. 80024 Margood Resort Land— • Q. Grady Minor, McGee, Victor Latavish, have been hired and are proceeding with permitting, design, and rezoning of site. • Victor Latavish has submitted permit application to CDES is reviewing for permit will establish construction documents to put out to bid by 04/10. • Victor Latavish has sent letter to FCT to respond to Architect and Civil Historic Preservation comments by 07/10. • Historic Preservation provided response that indicates keeping the stage and trusses meeting with Victor Latavish 08/10. • Will bid 12/10. • Barry contacted Grant, who indicated that he relies on Historic Preservation, but will intercede when difference of opinion exist. • Revising drawings to answer comments from FCT. 80059 Golden Gate Estates • Vanderbilt Beach Extension Park— acquiring land for expansion of road. - 5 - 1611 All • Tony reviewed 60% design plans from Transportation on 02/02/09 with Michael Greene. After 60% is completed, Transportation to place project on hold for approximately 5 years. • Will complete survey for Caxamabas Conversion completion by 08/10. • Survey completed. 80085 Immokalee South Park Community Park -- • Received approval from HUD to expend funding for design work. • 60% design approved — anticipate 90% by 08/10. • Architect and Consultant answering SDPA comments from CDES. • Architect to resubmit the answers to CDES. 80602 North Collier Regional Park • Tony to hire consultant to video sanitary pipes in order to meet conveyance standards by Public Utilities anticipate completion by 08/10. • Consultant and Underground utility contractor has been hired and will start work by end of Sept. 2010. 368 80121 GG Community Park Bike /Path • Sue Zimmerman has received Magnolia PUD easement and is recording it with the County • PO issued to ABB to design, permit, and construction documents -- anticipate construction by 09/10. Meandering pathways. • Must resolve issues with School Board in the Easement. 161VAll Barefoot Beach Ordinance 16 I,1, All ORDINANCE NO. 2010- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE WHICH REGULATES THE USE OF AND CONDUCT ON COLLIER COUNTY PRESERVES, BY SPECIFICALLY ADDING CONSERVATION COLLIER PRESERVES AND REVISING SeetienSFC'TIONS ONE: INTENT ANU PURPOSES; SEC'T'ION FOUR: DEFINITIONS: SECTION FIVE: RECULATION OF USE AND CONDUCT AT PRESERVES; ADDING SECTION SEVEN: ACTIVITIES REQUIRING A SPECIAL PERMIT; ADDING SECTION EIGHT: MERCHANDIZING, ADVFRTIZING AND SIGNS AND REVISING SECTION NINE: HOURS OPERATION _(Iist--*«�); PR(4V4D NGr -rA4R IN- T- ENT-A?J- "TJRP-0SE;- PROVIDING -TITLE -,AND- CITA T ION; SE Trnr,.�.'- _�cnR.-rr 'nRT.IGPt6 {i.t'T — AND - -vDE TNVUlONS; RROJDI`G —FO - V-ESShtr REGULA'TRI^N PRi(X - DING - rOR er +TIAN -O ATIO>V'S; EQ131PMEN-T REPw VA S -AND NLEniNi��oc N- -PR-E -ccu —S AND —"JQ4N —N4G Axrka-voc. o - OA4DI -NG— FOIE— PE+NAk,`FHES; -PRO D r_FOR EWcn- ��PCEMEcNT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT' AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Whereas, the recreational use of Preserves is a treasured asset of this County which - - - - { Formatted: dusnFled, Line seac-ng: eingle_ is afforded to the public at large, including residents of and visitors to the County; and Whereas, the manner, mode, type, and degree of uses to which the Preserves and adjoining waters are placed by the public affect the health, safety, and welfare as well as the right to enjoyment thereof by the individuals using said Preserves and adjoining waters for recreational purposes as well as those residing nearby; and Whereas, preservation of the representative objects or conditions is all important and resource considerations trust Ile given priority; and Whereas, uses permitted are usually of a passive nature, related to the aesthetic, educational, and scientific enjoyment of the objects and conditions maintained in the Preserve and adjoining waters. Other uses, in limited amounts, are permitted if compatible. Whereas. The Board of County Commissioner has acquired lands designated as-, - Formatted Font Bead preserves under the Conservation Collier Program for the ow pose of protection ��FOrmatted :nsheed,mdeouFvstIine o.;', restoration. and management of environmentally sensitive lands in (oll1 ier County for the - u"`spacing: single - benefit of present and furore generations and Whereas the Conservation Collier preserves will provide opTnorhrpities for oassivc�-- {ormatted: ]usnPied Line spacing single recreation environmental education and scientific research; and Fo�matted_r -orn eoid _ 1611AlI Whereas the Board of County Commissioners will manaee Conservation Collier {FOrmatted:FOnt:BOld _ -.. —� Preserves toopreserve and maintain their natural functions and values. Now, therefore be it ordained by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier - - -- {Formatted: Justified, Line spacing: single County, Florida, that: Section One: Intent and Purpose It is the intent and purpose of this Ordinance to protect Barefoot Beach Preserve Park Conservation Collier Preserves and any other designated Preserves in Collier County, Florida. Section Two: Title and Citation This Ordinance shall be known as the "Collier County Preserve Ordinance." Section Three: Applicability This Ordinance shall apply to and be enforced in all Collier County Preserves-. Section Four: Definitions For the purposes of this Ordinance, the following words shall be defined as set forth below: A-. -Beach - the soft sand portion of land lying seaward of a seawall or line of - -- - -) Formatted: Justified, Line spacing: single, cl manentve etation and 300' Seawaid of the mean high water line. Numbered + Level: 1 A Numbering Style: A, B, P ' g g C, _. + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned A. at: 0.75" + Indent at: r B-- Collier County or County- shall mean Collier County, Florida. " Formatted: Justified, Line spacing single, B Don't adjust space besveen Latin and Asian text Don t adjust space between Asian text and C. Commercial vessels - non - pleasure craft used for commercial purposes,', numbers _ operating for profit, with paying customers. Formatted: Justified Line spacing single D. Conservation-Collier Preserves 8re those (anal acllulred In whole of In arC ' Formatted: Justified Line spacing single, through the Conselvitio_n_CoBier Proerann_as well as lands_ donated-for Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: A,B, conservation ill' poses to the Contiervatlnn Collier Ple°lanl C i Startat: I + Alignment: Left +Aligned at 0.56" + Indent at: 0.81" E_County Park EnfmTement Officer (Pal k Ranger) - any person designated by the - • °- - - -- - - Board of Count Commissioners as ulenufied in Laws of Florida Ch. 69 -dh9 as Formatted: Jushfted, Line spacng: single, County (" ) Didn't adjust space between Latin and Asian a county park enforcement officer is hereby authorized to issue citations within text Don't adjust space bemean Asian textand the boundaries of any Collier County park, public beaches, beach access areas numbers adjacent to county parks, county operated parking facilities, and public areas immediately adjacent to county parks for violations of any Collier County ordinances, duly enacted by the Board of County Commissioners to regulate acts within these areas. purstiont t_o Resolution _ Preserves_ shall be . _ Formatted: rvnr frolic _ considered Parks for the ourneses of enforcement. but the AUIR and other reputations arc not affected by the declaration Pressuring we need a Resolution tg include Preserves as Park fpr the Ju t rouses of enforcement) l� Formatted: Justified, Line spacing: single, Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, _. + Start at 1 + Alignment Left + Aligned at 0.75" + Indent at: 1" 161 1 A11 A— Cultural /iiisteriFHjst ric P.-<^a� sResources - any archaeological and /m" historic site, feature or artifact found within tbpJ -- -any Preserve as 2a }>E, pun arv. - : - F_ - Formatted: ]ustified, Line spacing: single, —Gulf - the Gulf Of MCXICO Don' tad just space between Latin and Asian text, Don't adjust space between Asian text and G i numbers FI Indecent Act - to expose or eXh Ib1Y One's sexual oreans in publ lc. or so hear thereto Cormatted: lusbfied Line spacing single as t0 be SfUI fr011l anj prlVate prfllllse S, -I❑ a lulgarl)r indecent manlier or -to be Formatted: Justified, Line spacing: single, naked in pubhe except m env place provided or set ana1L for thatpupose 1 mother' ^„ Don't adjust space between Latin and Asian breast feeding of her baby does not under am wcmmtanec violate this section. text, Don't adjust space between Asian text and umbers G-Law Enforcement Officer - means any person who is elected, appointed, or-,, Formatted: Font: rimes New Roman employed full or part time by the state, the county, or municipality who is vested Formatted: runt: rises New Roman, tz pt with the authority to bear arms and make arrests; and whose primary — responsibiljty is th e detection and prevention of crime, or the enforcement of the penal, criminal, traffic, or highway laws of the state or comity. JFormatted: Font Times New Roman ` 7 Formatted: Font: Times New Roman I. E. Preserve - a Preserve in Collier County is hereby defined as an area set asicle essentially to maintain Objects or conditions existing therein. A Collicr County Preserve is an area designated to perpetuate certain exceptional objects m'�, , conditions that provide a type of recreational experience, which would not be possible otherwise. A Preserve, therefore, is designed, managed, and restored (if necessary) to save representative samples, of various sizes, of natural conditions characteristic of Collier County, Florida. L K_ VeS- 4,,...,r --p Do file led tw }! {1c4! -d- -4e h;I,,. a++#- eweff- 0thall d�� +pEtar�+r��.,a�k,- f3Thrrd -�.., ;y.,'a- ✓ -e,'�' � z.. ,�!c;.._ ..r�El� wdter�neh +t3irt�- per' ,rJnal- kvz+ter€r�af�!;ttfh�jt�t �k +�- exec= rc+rr»r'+- �� €}t- �#cdr', dam.', �a,..•,. oi=- oi'r•• Passive Recteartingi Passive Recreation means recreational uses whom very minhounl olteration_of vegetation topoaraphv or other natiN'e, -fear is necessary Ior the eniovment of the site amenities. Activities which arc considered passive include, but are not limited to. hiking bicscling. nature observation, canZ picnicking, non - motorized recreation Formatted: Formatted: Justified, Line spacing: single, Don't adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Don't adjust space between Asian text and numbers Formatted: Justified, Line spacing: single, Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: A, a, C, _. F Start at: 1 + Alignment Left + Aligned at: 0.5' + Indent at: 0.75" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Justified, Line spacing: single, Don't adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Don't adjust space between Asian text and numbers and tipolts and archaeological of historic pi'eu.ivatle n., (Formatted: Font +ueadings -- -_ l I Vessel a motor plopcilcd -or tltillciolly_ltopoled vehicle_ and every otllOt° - -I Formatted: Justified Line spacing _single dcscl ilitlon of boas waterci;ts bo ainLauJzpat undwLi 111 t- sUph>lle Oil the w_iw re _utied or capable of being used .as_ 1 means of ti Jnspomitlon on or- in the water„ Including: personal wateicl; art such as jet skis, wave, runners, sea sleets, dolphin boats-ur�other such Product name. Formatted: Normal, indent: Left: 0.56', Line spacing: single, No bullets or numbering, Don't adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Section Five, Regulation of use and conduct in Barefoot Beach Preserve Conservation Don't adjust space between Asian text and Collier Preserves and any other designated Preserve in Collier County Florida. [t shall be numbers prohlbnied ft: Formatted. Justified Line spacing.single A bljulo, kill, molest, collect possess or cause direct or i Licht cet ii cry to any spec lea o Font Time New Roman sea turtle, gopher tortoise, live sand dollars, shorebirds, birds of pre}, Ike shells, live Formatted. Font Times New Ronan 161VA11 sea stars or to iutcrfere, destroy, or tamper in any way with the nesting of sea turtles, birds of prey, gopher tortoises, or shorebirds. All wildlife, their nests and burroNNs within the Preserve boundaries arc protected. B. Willfully marls, deface, disfigure, injure, tamper with, or displaca or remove any building, hiidge, table, bench, fire pits fireplace, educational or informational structure, walkway, railing, paving or paving material, water line or other public utility or parts appurtenant thereof, signs, notices or ¢fie— eaed�laca =ds whether temporary or permanent, monuments, stakes, posts, o other boundary markers or other structures or equipment, facilities or park ur preserve property or any appurtenances whatsoever, either real or personal. C. Cut, break, mutilate, injure, disturb, sever from the ground or remove any growing thing, including, but not limited to, any plant, flower, flower bed, .shrub, tree, growth or any branch, item, fruit or leaf thereof; or bring into or have in his possession in any County Preserve any tool or instrument which could be used for the cutting thereof, or any garden or agricultural implements or tools which could be used for the removal thereof; or pile or maintain any material or debris of any kind against or upon the same or attach any rope, cable or other contrivance thereto; or set fire to any trees, shrubs, plants, flowers, grass, plant growth or living timber, or suffer fire upon land to extend into County Preserve lands; or go upon any prohibited areas designated by the Collier County Parks and Recreation Director or Conservatica Collier. Program staff. All plant -life, including seagrass and scagrass beds located within the Preserve boundaries arc protected. D Plant any type of vegetative materials or release any–plant or animal into any Preserve. t =1i. Moles[ harm fiiohten kill trap hunt chase shout throw objects at harass feed or otherwise inhibit the natural movement and habits of say invertebrate mammal amphibian reptile fish or bird No person shall remove or have in his or her possession the +1_ounv of any wild ainnal or the eggs or nest of any amphibian re1tile fish bird or invertebrate. The- provisions of this section are not applicable in designatet,fshing�s nd duru kann l hunts w de lie . _a . Pepper Ranch Preserve Quality Wildlife Management Hunt Prngra 111: F_ o' cause to be placed in the waters of any 'fhrow, discharge, or otherwise place fountain, pond, lake stream, hay, estuary, or other body of water in or adjacent to any County Preserve or any to ibutuy, stream, stm in sewer, or drain flowing into such waters, any substance, matter of thing, liquid or solid, which will or may result in the pollution of said waters, G. Disturb the�aeac-. use any pi_ofa'i0 bQh ene or 1 asl>hon out late 1, _or ti o_ any indecent act. 11 Endanger the safety ofanyperson by any conduct o 'act. Lf ommit any assa ult battery orengegei� J. -Budd o attempt to build light ,or cause to be lighted any i e or fires except with} in s accified_ areas in Conservation Collier Preserves in fire nits provided therein. K. Carry, possess, or consume any alcoholic beverages within County Preserve boundaries. ibl V A11 E J_ Carry, possess or use any firearms except as allowed wider state pern itand during planned hunts under the Pepper Ranch Preserve 9uality Wildlife Management Hunt Program l %:M Enter or exit any County Preserve except at established entrances and exits, or at established times. N. Attach any posters or directional signs to trees or any vegetation within County Preserve boundaries. 0. Prevent any person from using any Conservation Collier Preserves or any of its facilities. or interfere with such uses as are in compliance with this—Ordinance and the rules applicable to such use. f:T_ Violate anysite- saecificrulesnosted at rp eserves k;-(L_ Drive any unauthorized vehicle on any area within the County Preserve boundaries except on the paved Preserve roads or parking areas; or park an authorized vehicle in other than an established or designated area; or park any unauthorized vehicle in a Preserve overnight. MZ. Ride a bicycle, unicycle, skateboard, roller blades, and roller skates on other than a paved vehicular road or path designated for that purpose. Bicycles and unicycles must be placed in a bicycle rack when such is provided. Bicycles and /or unicycles shall not he left on the ground or paving in any such place or position so as to pi esent any obstruction to pedestrian or vehicular traffic; shall not be placed, positioned, or locked up to any vegetation within the Preserve boundaries. I.S. Operate or cause to he operated a hand, animal, motor, or engine driven wheel, track or other vehicle or implement on, over or across any part of a sand dune, hill or ridge nearest the Gulf of Mexico or the vegetation growing thereon or seaward thereof, or to operate or drive such a vehicle on the area seaward thereof, commonly referred to as the beach within Preserve boundaries. Pedestrian traffic over dunes is prohibited. r<,T. Fishing. It shall be unlawful for any person while in Preserve boundaries to intentionally fish for sharks or to fish by those methods commonly known as "chumming" or "blood - baiting." Nothing herein shall be construed to create a duty of any sort on the part of any law enforcement officer or park employee to prevent fishing or to warn of the presence of sharks in the Gulf of Mexico. Fishing within Preserve boundaries must adhere to Federal and State fishing guidelines; it is the responsibility of those fishing to know those Federal and State guidelines. 6:r1Salvage operations and excavations for the purpose of removing cultural and natural resources are prohibited within Preserve boundaries. 'File use of metal detectors to determine the probability and location of cultural resources is prohibited with Preserve boundaries. MY Commercial Vessel Passenger Drop -off within Preserve boundaries. No person or organization other that County licensed vendors shall conduct business within Preserve boundaries. All Preserve visitors must enter the Preserve at designated entrance points. Section Six: Vessel Regulation A. Back bays and estuaries within Preserve boundaries. 1611411 SectionSev 'ren: Penalty_ A. Any person violating the provisions of this Ordinance or failsti” to comply with the requirements of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined or imprisoned, or both, as provided by law, and in addition shall pay all costs and expenses incurred in the prosecution of such violation. In addition, and as an alternative means of enforcement, Collier County may onforcc the provisions or requirements of this Ordinance by means a. No person except law enforcement officers, authorized emergency personnel, or other person actually engaged in a rescue attempt shall operate motorized vessels in back bays and estuaries within Preserve boundaries. Section Seven Activities Requiring a Special Permit A. Call •---- Formattetl: List Paragraph, Line spacing: B. Erection of temporary or permanent structures single , Numbered +Level: l +Numbering C. Horseback riding Style: A, B, C, _. + Start at: 1 + Alignment. Left +Aligned at: o.s' +indent at: 0.7s^ 1). Public demonstrations and-gatherings -- -- - -- F. Collection of plant and animal specimens For scientific research F. After -hours and night -time use of Conservation Collier Preserves. Such uses may require a fee as promulgated by Resolution of the Board of Countv Commissioners G. I Inntl lib - Formatted: Underline '- -- Formatted: Normal Section Eight: Merchandizing Advertizin» and Signs - - -- A. No person shall expose or offer for bale. rent or trade_ anv article er thine. or _station• — �Formatted: runt roes New Boman or Mace any stand, cart. or vehicle, 1'or the transportation. sale or drsplav of anv ,-- Formatted: List Paragraph, Numbered+ alticlL merchandise or other itun ttithin the limits of arty Conservation Collier Level 1+ Numbei ing Style. A, B,C +Start Preserves. unless as paitofan event organized andfacilitated by Conservahon Collier ate +Alignment Left +Aligned at o, 1 Indent at 0.75" B No per'SOII Shall IiSC [he Co ❑SerV dh O❑ Collier PI CSCIYCS roadways 07IalIt S. Or enter -- are anv Conservation Collier Presa�rs_For the purpose of announcing, disci advertising or calling attention to my person. political part . religious h nstitution, or meetings- or assemblies thereof. or for the ourpne ot' demonstra int rdva-tising or calling attention to any reticle or Sere ice for sale or lur hire, nor shall anv signs, sl�eans, loudspeakers or advedismc disnlnt for used „ 'tor lmoses unlcsg a tyl"Itten permit allows Such activity. _ - {Formatted: Font +Headings, underline G No person Shall display. distribute. POSI� Pastc. I-1I1Lle.. tack or othU AVRe fix ally Formatted: Font limes New Roman handbilh nan Met. ci cular. siun.ltlacard ur anv other glinted maltcr containing edvertisin rt nhm any (onservuuon Collier I icxnes or umn and , _ '... ' upon Friend _ tree, fence O Sh uU ll I'C. . _ -(FOrmattetl: Font +Headings, Underline D Specal events may be permitted as identified in the attached Presuld Events I_ec Schedule. -Formatted: Font Bold,Undarline ' - Lormatteit ]ustlf ad, Line spacing: single Section Nine: Hours of Operation All preserves with exception of the Pepper Ranch Preserve shall be open daily during the hours posted ateach preserve typically 8:a.m. to sunset. SectionSev 'ren: Penalty_ A. Any person violating the provisions of this Ordinance or failsti” to comply with the requirements of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined or imprisoned, or both, as provided by law, and in addition shall pay all costs and expenses incurred in the prosecution of such violation. In addition, and as an alternative means of enforcement, Collier County may onforcc the provisions or requirements of this Ordinance by means 161 1A11 of any civil remedy before the appropriate Code Enforcement Special Master or in a court of competent jurisdiction. Section EightElevem Enforcement A. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be enforced by members of any duly authorized law enforcement agency or officers having jurisdiction in Collier County, Florida. Section Nine: Conflict and Severability A. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affecttlne validity of the remaining portion. Section Ten: Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of notice from the Florida Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been filed with the Florida Secretary of the State. Passed and duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this__ _day of ________. 2-0432010. 161.1 All Parks Master Plan Collier County Parks and Recreation Master Plan Project Schedule Description Target Date Develop Inventory and Provide to County for Review Aug. 31, 2010 Complete Demographic Analysis Sept. 8, 2010 Complete Initial Needs Analysis Sept. 17, 2010 Conference call to review approach Mid -Sept. Draft of Focus Group Materials to County for Review Sept. 30, 2010 County provide comments on Focus Group materials Oct. 5, 2010 Hold Focus Group Oct. 14, 2010 Summarize and Document Focus Group Input Oct. 29, 2010 Submit Draft Master Plan to County for Review Dec. 3, 2010 County provide comments on draft Master Plan Dec. 17, 2010 Revise Master Plan (as needed) Dec. 31, 2010 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board /BCC meetings TBD - Jan. 2011 G: \Parks Master Plan \Collier Parks Master Plan - Project Schedule.xlsx A11 2010 AU I R 161 1A 11 2010 AUIR SUMMARY FORM Facility Type: Community Park Land (Category A) Level of Service Standard (LOSS): 1.2 ac / 1,000 in the unincorporated area Unit Cost: $230,000 /ac* Using the peak season unincorporated population, the following is set forth: Available Inventory as of 9/30/2010 Required Inventory as of 9/30/2015 Proposed AUIR FY 2010/11- 2014/15 5 -year Surplus or (Deficit) Expenditures Total Expenditures Revenues Impact fees allocated to fee simple acquisitions Total Revenues Revenues needed to maintain existing LOSS Acres Value 591.54 ** $136,054,200 472.16 * ** $108,596,800 47.00 $(10,810,000) 72.38 $ 16,647,400 $0 $0 none Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the CCPC and PC recommend to the BCC approval of the "Proposed AUIR FY 10/11 - 14/15 ". *Note: *Unit Cost $230,000 /ac is an average of cost per acre based on 2009 Impact Fee Study. Unit cost will be adjusted prior to the September 20`h CCPC AUIR special meeting, based upon the Impact Fee Update and Indexing expected to be finalized mid to late August 2010. * *Note: The Randall Curve acreage was inadvertently allocated to Regional Park Inventory in 2009 AUIR, added back to Community Park Inventory. The 47 acres (Randall Curve) is anticipated to be removed from the Community Park Inventory in 2011 -2012, this acreage is expected to be part of a future land exchange for the Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park acquisition strategy. ** *Note: Unincorporated Population 393,463 x 0.0012000 LOSS =472.16 acres c 0 N 3 v 0 u o Q LL � � o � d o C O o � N � Q E O U N 0 W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aW 0 N N N N N N N N N N N �uviv�vvva� �g°o O O N N N N N N N N N OQ tp M M N N N N N N N N N F to tR EA � NT fA � fff 69 eA EA W 0 M 0 0 0 m 0 °° 0 0 0 0 0 m° c2f E5 p M M M M N O a 0 M O r N LU U Ny O O O c 0 0 < M cD W N } mU J W It <° U K_ N O O N N < O m ro r U. W vi W W L) J L) v v a v v v v v v v v m Y m m v °v a v v a v a W U W K Z 7 0 0 p Y o g� Z a It o v IL Q- a W° U R_W'N oV envoi a fDO�m�`�"ornm V O two vvvavvvav�n O in N v�1O Oi Q K o a w W Z F- 0 K 0 7 V M r M tD 00 M tD O� Q r tD It A a J r T M a n M M t0 N r a p' w M O r N M 0 N r O p pj N 61 M lD m r r ro Of M 0 N M M 7 N D O M M M M v a a0 a ? Z 7 � N O p O N N N <D < O � N N U Q O< N M a N f0 r 00 0� 0 W �} O 000000 ° o0 00 0 0 (9 r � � o N a m N O U �- m m r � d C O N L L I- X >. a O G C � G a - O Y � m m CL o �r C N � O E m En 02 U a 0 0 Y U U O m o- n � a y N a m a m m m _ N � U 7 m Q N w t O " O N N C p T N `o C O N N > C G . o m ° CL 0 m > c c O Y a m 0� d O T a C E � E 0 0 U N T « m C O m E m � o m >oa C O O m m � 3 0- Ol N U O m m o O Y m � N d m m N 2 a c U � � — m N m � c c m m m � Z w J s U - 13 W a n r C Y O m 0O Z K �� 16�jAll r_ O cu Q 0 EL O O O r N CD U Q N 0 J V1 d U Q Y a w c C3 CG G O U x D Q O O N 0 N r 16 11A11 saaay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c0 ch O r V m � N O N pj O N I i i O O N I r O i N 9 m o > � N Q I d I o N I � Q o � N N V Q � U cty N N M C � N N v O h E a0 C m 41 N CL R O � N N I I o N I o I o i O O O O N O O O O O uoi}eindod O N T T U- 0 Y T O T LL LL 0 Y C d C C C R J Y R a E E 0 U C •N d 87 C R s U v m Y R Q C al 161 1A11 4 d O O 000 O- O O O O O - p � �Z. ��69 to _3 CC d Q X W L N m U EA fH 00 00 EA fA lfj to to !A - EA 1A fPr W (fl FA EA M ER fq O _ p O O O - p O O O O eD M r co r pp O O O _ C N fl fA r ER N O O of Q I J J J J J J J J J J J a a a a a a a a a a a O O O O O• O O O O O • O F- I-- f- C r N M el' h" w h EO 01 O r r r r r r r = r N a +�O ' O r N M N f0 f, co m LU o J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. Z W H O N _ Oi r } LL O H N r d ? • • r G O O U F Y C f6 - LL o ac _ @ N a V N a a m J o c 0 O U E a W O O LL N O N M V CO co m O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N a 0 U N x X N N @ U @ N L N O N O N C 0 O ma c o c @ Y N m � 4 c >, o C _N E U O @ U Y o � L_ d E @ C O ` O � ril a m O a c N � U o CD a � o s mo Q U U � C O] @ N NE z° U N c a N C @ N @ U @ @ v w O Q N U O Q Z p 161 1 All 2010 AUIR REGIONAL PARK SUMMARY FORM Facility Type: Regional Park Land (Category A) Level of Service Standard (LOSS): 2.9 ac / 1,000 countywide Unit Cost: $230,000 /ac* Using the peak season countywide population, the following is set forth Expenditures Proposed AUIR FY 2010/11- 2014/15 acquisitions $ 38,065 000 Total Expenditures $ 38,065,000 Revenues Proposed added value through commitments, leases and interdepartmental transfers $ 38,065 000 Total Revenues $ 38,065,000 Revenues needed to maintain existing LOSS none Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the CCPC and PC recommend to the BCC approval of the "Proposed AUIR FY 2010/11 - 2014/15" projects for inclusion in the 2010 CIE. *Note: Unit Cost $230,000 /ac is based on 2009 Impact Fee Study. Unit cost will be adjusted prior to the September 201h CCPC AUIR special meeting, based upon the Impact Fee Update and Indexing expected to be finalized mid to late August 2010. `Note: 2010 -2011: The Randall Curve acreage was inadvertently allocated to Regional Park Inventory in 2009 AUIR, the 47 acres were removed and added back into Community Park Inventory. ** *Note: Peak season countywide population 443,531 x 0.0029000 LOSS = 1286.24 Proposed AUIR 2011/2015 *2010 -2011: 37.50 ac FPL Greenway Trail Interdepartmental Transfer from Transportation. *2011 -2012: 3 ac School Commitment Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park (Lake pathway) - In exchange for GG High School Gopher Tortoise Preserve *2011 -2012: 9 ac Intergovernmental Partnership Isles of Capri *2013 -2014: 62 ac Interdepartmental Transfer Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park *2014 -2015: 4 ac Lease arrangement Pulling Park *2014 -2015: 50 ac Interdepartmental Partnership Pepper Ranch Acres Value Available Inventory as of 9/30/2010 1074.68 ** $247,176,400 Required Inventory as of 9/30/2015 1286.24 * ** $295,835,200 Proposed AUIR FY 2010/11 - 2014/15 165.50 $ 38,065,000 5 -year Surplus or (Deficit) (46.06) $(10,593,800) Expenditures Proposed AUIR FY 2010/11- 2014/15 acquisitions $ 38,065 000 Total Expenditures $ 38,065,000 Revenues Proposed added value through commitments, leases and interdepartmental transfers $ 38,065 000 Total Revenues $ 38,065,000 Revenues needed to maintain existing LOSS none Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the CCPC and PC recommend to the BCC approval of the "Proposed AUIR FY 2010/11 - 2014/15" projects for inclusion in the 2010 CIE. *Note: Unit Cost $230,000 /ac is based on 2009 Impact Fee Study. Unit cost will be adjusted prior to the September 201h CCPC AUIR special meeting, based upon the Impact Fee Update and Indexing expected to be finalized mid to late August 2010. `Note: 2010 -2011: The Randall Curve acreage was inadvertently allocated to Regional Park Inventory in 2009 AUIR, the 47 acres were removed and added back into Community Park Inventory. ** *Note: Peak season countywide population 443,531 x 0.0029000 LOSS = 1286.24 Proposed AUIR 2011/2015 *2010 -2011: 37.50 ac FPL Greenway Trail Interdepartmental Transfer from Transportation. *2011 -2012: 3 ac School Commitment Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park (Lake pathway) - In exchange for GG High School Gopher Tortoise Preserve *2011 -2012: 9 ac Intergovernmental Partnership Isles of Capri *2013 -2014: 62 ac Interdepartmental Transfer Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park *2014 -2015: 4 ac Lease arrangement Pulling Park *2014 -2015: 50 ac Interdepartmental Partnership Pepper Ranch O N A u n Q � D LL C O N � J s `m a o m � N � N O J W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J NN O r N 1N(1 N N N A A A Q Q ry A N N N N N N N l0 O 0 < W W W Vf W fA l9 Vi IA N W F 00 °o °o . O H w Q O o 0 0 0 0 �~ O� r M � � N rym N t00 C O W f00 t0 N Ol rAl V On y V A f9 � di K W N W f9 fA W W N Y W U _ m LL Q V1 w a B w w tt m m M m m o m ro m m m U e Q Q a m W W K Q J _ LL �' m O m A U A m M O v M V M A th M N O a N N LL� O LLW O N eN- m M N p O lm0 Ymf Imo V OJ M_ O c m M m N N m M W � N O A ONI O a 0 � N O O O N N N �- m O N O o 0 0 0� t� m f � o N N r a m N O r 161 1 All -o E U v O � C Q V O n O Y v ° r °m c O p C p N U O O O � N N N p� N I U p m � u v w � i a p c u+ o r o O d N E N N v o v a o m o m � V o ° c n jV t?p_Y ¢DN O V N R] 2 N X 0 0 r v E m m LL v o v E d E E U U VI N N D p. N O T R O O N D> 'N 2 L N` N N N °MMmN av°ivm v�cl�ic vi vim ai c 0 m 2 O O O O cn N d L V G) 6v1 N O r vi L V Q Y fLiS a .o d Q O P O N 1611 All Sojod O O O O O O O O O O O o I� N r N N r N N r N O O O N O O O O O O O O �IJ O r O N U � O p � N O @ O N � O I � N � o cd N C d p ~ W d a °o d v ( -0 D_ o m m O O V U m O O o O co O O r v n U � O � N a O v � O = Y � o cd N � ~ W d a °o d v ( -0 D_ o O O m O O V O O O O co O O O O V d M M uoileind0d U O $ m N a U1 U U N E O D UN ` E N — Y 0 N U O U a) U. v rn w o a —COQ N U � O O � O ~ W d °o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V d M M uoileind0d O N a) m T } LL O r T O LL LL L, O C N C C R J Y L R EL R C O N N d C R t U v m Y R Q C ZI 1611 ;All 0) 0 O O O O- O O O O 0 O � fAfAfA �_ �(a 40 Vk 447. -M M d Q LU Vf L N N U o 00000 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 O�woaOOO - _ 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 O (n N O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O tp M N N r- O w (D CO N O N 3 N (D (O O (D (` N N O u] V_ N Ih- N N R I oW 00 N 6q N eP 4 In N O O r 47 > ( fA (A fA r r N M w (A fR fA'a - (A (f-7 fA - fH h y it) 0 Cl 0 00 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 000 0 ^0 00 0 CV Q M M d1 M O O H (D V H O O O O M O O o o 0 r Cl) J J J J J J J J J J J a a a s a- a s a a a a F F F F F- 0 LL O 00-0 O• O O O O O • O F F FC� F F F F F- F F- N M V' W) w f� 00 fA O C N a p @ O @ r N@ M d' h w n co (7) 111 R 0 @ LL .` LL LL LL U LL LL LL -Q LL LL LL W 3 c c 0 J N @ of L @ o N F a) U uDi Y @ D- LL O N 0 0 0 m fn c V r ILL1 Nm m as Um LL O F- 0 r Q N LL N F- r- 0 .0 .0 N N (p N N m 4 g _ @ m N Q E E E E c E 0 U 0 V C c o E @ r @ V a @ > > > (U 0 0 0 a) m o 0 o (D @ (D > > C C � C J C c 0 w v M T (D r O O LL N N m W N O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N A11 2010 Collier County Park Land Inventory 161.1 District location Type Acreage Community Park Acres Neighborhood Park Acres Marco Caxambas P Regional 4.20 420 Collier Blvd Boating P Regional 0.50 0.50 Ti edail Beach P Re Tonal 31.60 31.60 _ South Marco Beach Access Regional 5.00 5.00 Goodland Boating P Regional 5.00 5.00 Mar Good Harbor P Regional 250 2.50 Isles of Capri NP Neighbor 0.15 0.15 North Naples iVeterans CP Community 43.64 43.64 Poinciana NP Neighbor 0.30 0.30 Pelican Bay CP Community 15.00 15.00 Cocohatchee River P Regional 720 7.20 Naples Park Elementary Community 5.00 5.00 Barefoot Beach Access Regional 5.00 5.00 Barefoot Beach Preserve CP Regional 159.60 159.60 Barefoot Beach State Land Regional 186.00 186.00 Clam Pass P Regional 35.00 35.00 North Gulfshore Beach Access [Regional 0.50 0.50 Vanderbilt Beach Regional 5.00 5.00 Oakes NP Neighbor 2.00 2.00 Conner P Neighbor 5.00 5.00 North Naples NP tee�r Friends Neighbor Osceola Elementary Community 3.20 3.20 North Collier RP Regional 207.70 207.70 Vineyards CP Community 35.50 35.50 Willoughby P Nei hbor 1.20 1.20 Veterans Memorial Elementary Community- 4.00 4.00 Golden Gate Golden Gate CP Community 35.00 35.00 Aaron Lutz NP Neighbor 3.20 3.20 Coconut Circle NP Neighbor 1.20 1.20 Golden Gate Community Center Community 21.00 21.00 Palm Springs NP Neighbor 6.70 6.70 Rita Eaton NP Neighbor 4.80 4.80 _ Golden Gate Greenway Community 3.00 3.00 East Naples East Naples CP Communi)r 47.00 47.00 Su den RP Regional 120.00 120.00 Gulfcoast CP Community 5.00 5.00 Naples Manor NP Neighbor 0.30 0.30 Ba view P Regional 6.27 6.27 South Naples Eagle Lakes CP Community 32.00 3200 . Manatee CP Community 60.00 60.00 Panther NP Neighbor 0.50 0.50 Port of The Islands Regional 5.55 5.55 Central Naples Naples Zoo 50.00 50.00 --.Regional Gordon River Greenway P Regional 79.00 79.00 Freedom Park Regional 25.16 25.16 Immokalee Immokalee CP Community 23.00 23.00 Immokalee Sports Complex Community 14.00 14.00 Immokalee High School Community 1.00 1.00 Airport P Community 19.00 19.00 South Immokalee NP Neighbor 3.20 3.20 Ann Oleski P Regional 2.30 2.30 Dreamland NP School 0.50 0.50 Tony Rosbou h CP Community 7.00 7.00 Oil Well P Neighbor 5.50 5.50 Eden Park Elementary Community 2.80 2.80 Urban Estates I Max A Hasse CP Community 2000 . 20.00 1611 + All Biq Corkscrew Island RP Lake Regional 90.00 90.00 Randall Curve Community 47.00 47.00 Corkscrew Elementary Community 16.90 16.90 Livingston Woods NP (surplus) Neighbor Vanderbilt Extension CP Community 120.00 120.00 Sabal Palm Elementary Community 9.50 9.50 Palmetto Elementary Community 2.00 2.00 City of Naples Total Collier Units Beach Accesses Communit 1,659.17 0.50 3.81 25.26 591.54 0.50 29.55 _ Naples Landings Fleischmann Park 3.81 Cambier Park _ Communit 12.84 Pulling Park Lowdermilk Park 12.21 10.30 12.21 10.30 River Park CC Communit 1.61 9.78 7.00 Naples Preserve Anthony Park Neighbor 9.78 Total Naples Units 83.31 City of Marco Island Jane Hittler Neighbor 0.25 Veterans' Memorial Neighbor 025 Leigh Plummer Neighbor 3.50 Racquet Center Community 2.97 Frank Mackle Community 10.00 Wnterberry Neighbor 5.00 Total Marco Units 41.97 Everglades City CommunIty Park Community 0.86 McLeod Park Communit 1.04 Total Everglades Units 1.90 Total Units Value per Unit 1,786.35 $230,OOD 591.54 $230,000 $230,000 29.55 $230,000 Total Value $410,860,500 $135,054,409. $G,796,500 r } LL O 0 } LL T L O cc Y _ _ _ O Y L v Nd I.L _ N Y Lm cc a N d _ s U w O m E 3 N N d O7 _ m s U _ f0 J Y Lm a _ E O U III 0 0 Q C C � i i N (0 m m N d d d U 6 6 6 Q C C C > O_ O O O) O O 0� K K E O ui O O 0 oU a)Q o o0 O>, O O c O C O O Y 7 U U > E �Q c C, C O O O L L v v a a Y a Z a Z � N C U y F U - rn - a z = t O O U R ;., Q J v t- Y o w L J Q t6 Zw a as U W O = o Q O E w U d v 16 it O ti d' Y Q' a CL J a Z O F5 w w O F- w 0 Z x� U W W U Za A11 16 it O ti d' Y Q' a CL J a Z O F5 w w O F- w 0 Z x� U W W U Za A11 yw 3 Z O U L.r 1 W 1611AlI O OO s S ¢ x 6fYpY Y¢ OZ YQQ W RY YR°¢Y¢6YX U ¢d2 O WQ -a¢a N Q QQaQ�UR466LLFQW Y W YdF��NJ Y� Y dFaz »Qr rzdd p,'Q¢Y YQQZw � na Y�FFaF >f'JYO QLLQ °¢s¢d3=wOYx d rz- �zz >zYZ Ei- �.za¢3 s o¢u o f O'rE7VZUZJfZU FZ�daZYWfJSQN NO SUD�OOwO0O00LL0 ¢_W3<mUiUXiO�rY N_m O WWW NUNUUNSaW¢OmW�WWWxWW¢ uYUw��3wFwo u ZNmaF.o >F.E Ww ¢w0 J Y2KSpU¢QOaO��Q�pYZ °OW¢mZ��WEuZ ¢ zzo ¢aJ¢ rcaozwzrca¢� -Wo ¢a¢awwNZUw¢YYOYJOJow�owmYw pON ^ WV> °OYrLLJTOOWOa000°a00WOEZW� -W � ww�0000Q7¢O��N�a�0a0¢OQwgQU¢OQ /x� >¢>i U'UUWOwFffO�NmUZ0f0 »�dwu.¢O Fe 2nnnnmm�nnnvevvavevevnin �n in non in in nin Y a ¢Q rc d Ya arc o °o Yad ° as i o °o�¢np¢o dd o Y o mm ° °Om00 OS is >Y N ¢ W Y C S W a YzOp2�OZ OUSUm¢ W¢ O¢ Z¢C wwmiowmW w -¢¢dw xw wd ada Y w p2 wZ UJ��ZJW� Z¢mUU¢ Wo¢¢2YmUmY¢ J ¢a Y¢Ji2�U2yx¢O[�www aw °¢OwOad m¢Z�?UZELLUaZFmUn��NJW1Jm¢NYpa O¢ajNJJ= JONW00¢¢¢WaO2W¢a �mwmN � WZ 2g2w SLLLLSWWS�'SW -w¢xfJ �zarciUw�3waz¢rc�izrcarc�i�W�KZna Jota¢o¢o_ ¢¢¢¢oo¢oJOpao�?oaz¢¢ 3LL¢¢dpoNON2dmmUU>ZU2NmUfNUQZz p V O 6_ �e HEND Y COUNTY C 8SB N7 Y W r W J ® ° O J�J z a `w Qi Vl ,,^^ ¢ e z o Y ry O 3O e 000• • @ Z O U L.r 1 W 1611AlI O OO s S ¢ x 6fYpY Y¢ OZ YQQ W RY YR°¢Y¢6YX U ¢d2 O WQ -a¢a N Q QQaQ�UR466LLFQW Y W YdF��NJ Y� Y dFaz »Qr rzdd p,'Q¢Y YQQZw � na Y�FFaF >f'JYO QLLQ °¢s¢d3=wOYx d rz- �zz >zYZ Ei- �.za¢3 s o¢u o f O'rE7VZUZJfZU FZ�daZYWfJSQN NO SUD�OOwO0O00LL0 ¢_W3<mUiUXiO�rY N_m O WWW NUNUUNSaW¢OmW�WWWxWW¢ uYUw��3wFwo u ZNmaF.o >F.E Ww ¢w0 J Y2KSpU¢QOaO��Q�pYZ °OW¢mZ��WEuZ ¢ zzo ¢aJ¢ rcaozwzrca¢� -Wo ¢a¢awwNZUw¢YYOYJOJow�owmYw pON ^ WV> °OYrLLJTOOWOa000°a00WOEZW� -W � ww�0000Q7¢O��N�a�0a0¢OQwgQU¢OQ /x� >¢>i U'UUWOwFffO�NmUZ0f0 »�dwu.¢O Fe 2nnnnmm�nnnvevvavevevnin �n in non in in nin Y a ¢Q rc d Ya arc o °o Yad ° as i o °o�¢np¢o dd o Y o mm ° °Om00 OS is >Y N ¢ W Y C S W a YzOp2�OZ OUSUm¢ W¢ O¢ Z¢C wwmiowmW w -¢¢dw xw wd ada Y w p2 wZ UJ��ZJW� Z¢mUU¢ Wo¢¢2YmUmY¢ J ¢a Y¢Ji2�U2yx¢O[�www aw °¢OwOad m¢Z�?UZELLUaZFmUn��NJW1Jm¢NYpa O¢ajNJJ= JONW00¢¢¢WaO2W¢a �mwmN � WZ 2g2w SLLLLSWWS�'SW -w¢xfJ �zarciUw�3waz¢rc�izrcarc�i�W�KZna Jota¢o¢o_ ¢¢¢¢oo¢oJOpao�?oaz¢¢ 3LL¢¢dpoNON2dmmUU>ZU2NmUfNUQZz p V O 6_ O HEND Y COUNTY 8SB N7 a- W r J ® ° O J�J z `w Vl ,,^^ ¢ e z o Y ry O 3O e Z O U L.r 1 W 1611AlI O OO s S ¢ x 6fYpY Y¢ OZ YQQ W RY YR°¢Y¢6YX U ¢d2 O WQ -a¢a N Q QQaQ�UR466LLFQW Y W YdF��NJ Y� Y dFaz »Qr rzdd p,'Q¢Y YQQZw � na Y�FFaF >f'JYO QLLQ °¢s¢d3=wOYx d rz- �zz >zYZ Ei- �.za¢3 s o¢u o f O'rE7VZUZJfZU FZ�daZYWfJSQN NO SUD�OOwO0O00LL0 ¢_W3<mUiUXiO�rY N_m O WWW NUNUUNSaW¢OmW�WWWxWW¢ uYUw��3wFwo u ZNmaF.o >F.E Ww ¢w0 J Y2KSpU¢QOaO��Q�pYZ °OW¢mZ��WEuZ ¢ zzo ¢aJ¢ rcaozwzrca¢� -Wo ¢a¢awwNZUw¢YYOYJOJow�owmYw pON ^ WV> °OYrLLJTOOWOa000°a00WOEZW� -W � ww�0000Q7¢O��N�a�0a0¢OQwgQU¢OQ /x� >¢>i U'UUWOwFffO�NmUZ0f0 »�dwu.¢O Fe 2nnnnmm�nnnvevvavevevnin �n in non in in nin Y a ¢Q rc d Ya arc o °o Yad ° as i o °o�¢np¢o dd o Y o mm ° °Om00 OS is >Y N ¢ W Y C S W a YzOp2�OZ OUSUm¢ W¢ O¢ Z¢C wwmiowmW w -¢¢dw xw wd ada Y w p2 wZ UJ��ZJW� Z¢mUU¢ Wo¢¢2YmUmY¢ J ¢a Y¢Ji2�U2yx¢O[�www aw °¢OwOad m¢Z�?UZELLUaZFmUn��NJW1Jm¢NYpa O¢ajNJJ= JONW00¢¢¢WaO2W¢a �mwmN � WZ 2g2w SLLLLSWWS�'SW -w¢xfJ �zarciUw�3waz¢rc�izrcarc�i�W�KZna Jota¢o¢o_ ¢¢¢¢oo¢oJOpao�?oaz¢¢ 3LL¢¢dpoNON2dmmUU>ZU2NmUfNUQZz p V O 6_ 1611 All Informational Items Attendance Report 2010 16 11 A 11 vcAO )non ` IpFB MM APR MAY JUNE IJULY AUG SEPT OCT Nov DEC Ribes, John, Chairman x x x EX x x x Dlesky, Ski - Vice Chairman x x x x x x x Kerry Geroy x x x x x EX EX Barbara Buehler x x EX x x x EX David Saletko x x x x x x x Phil Brougham x x x x x EX RTEX x William Shafer A A x A x EX * no meeting in July X= Present A= Absent EX= Excused Absence L= Late LE -Left Early 1611 All BEACH AND WATER PARAB JULY 2010 MONTHLY REPORT Review • Preparations for opening Goodland Boat Park underway including a new gift -shop for the site, "Fair Harbor Fair Trade." • New rules and regulation signs being installed at all beach and boat ramp locations. • New outdoor furnishings for Port of the Islands and Freedom Park on order. • Tigertail Beach and Barefoot Beach parking lots have been re- shelled and contoured. • Cocohatchee River Park Marina palm trees have all been trimmed. • The Pet Friendly Water Fountain has been installed at Connor Park. • POI marina had dead vegetation removed and new sod put down. • Annual fuel tank inspections were preformed on all marina fuel operations. • Beach and Water hired one new full -time Park Ranger to assist with Community Park and Beach operations. • Bayview Playground removed. Outlook • Goodland Boating Park will have a soft opening for islanders on August 191h and open to the public on August 20th. A grand opening date in September is pending. • Lighting will be installed at POI in the boat dry storage area. • New fuel tanks at POI will be installed. • Clam Pass Boardwalk and Concession Repairs and Renovation RFP's being prepared. 1611 iA11 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board July, 2010 monthly report For the most part the month of July was all about summer camp for the staff at MHCP. The staff has spent many hours doing their utmost to provide a quality and rewarding experience for our campers. Aside from the everyday programming and field trips the campers were treated to some extra special visitors this month. Fist there was Eddie Figueroa from Discovery Reptiles. They came to the park with a large selection of reptiles some common and some rare to show to the children. He also gave a very informative talk about reptiles in general and specific information on the specimens on display. The Kowiachobee Animal preserve came to the park and gave an informative talk on the many animals on display. Next we had the Amazing Mr. A, a delightfully entertaining Magician that the children enjoyed very much. We also had a very talented Juggler entertain the children. His name is Gerard Tricarico and he had the children enthralled. Last but not least Karen Kocses from the Collier County Library System has been coming to the park on Friday afternoons to help the campers with the summer reading program. The park has started some new educational summer camp programs this year. Science, reading and math camps were offered for the first time at Max Hasse Park. A Collier County School teacher came to the park to conduct classes for elementary school children. The turnout was not as good as we had hoped but a good enough first step in making this a permanent summer camp offering. The actual numbers in the summer camp are ninety six elementary and twelve middle school campers in the full nine week camp. In July we had a total of one hundred ten weekly campers, both elementary and middle school. Also there was a total of three hundred and ninety six campers taking advantage of the before and after care. The park had one special event in July. It was the Monthly Yard Sale. This month we were extremely fortunate to get a corporate entity to sponsor the event. The Supporters of Estates Shopping Center Political Committee purchased all the garage sale spaces and made them available to vendors at no charge. As a result all of the spaces were taken. The yard sales have received enthusiastic local support making this one of the most successful yard sales to date. The Fitness center completed another successful month. The gym was used one thousand four hundred and eighty eight times by two hundred thirty nine unique users. The yoga class had nineteen participants, the strength training class had twenty participants and the Zumba class garnered three hundred and seventy six participants. 1611All 4 Staying with the athletic side of programming the Adult tennis class had four participants, the junior class had seven registrants and the pee wee class had 14 enrollees. On the programming side our summer Piano class had a total of eleven spots filled out of twelve available. Our Karate class had a very respectable thirty six participants this month. The Kinderdance program had only four enrollees this month. The staff at MHCP is looking forward to the end of summer camp 2010. FREEDOM PARK PARAB July 2010 OVERVIEW... 161 1A11 4 ...Visitation was slow due to the warm weather, but the rain has been beneficial to the plant life within the park. Many flowers and trees blooming... ...The first "Summer Camp" at Freedom Park was well received by the public and the children enjoyed themselves... ...The Park Volunteers logged 54 hours this month assisting the ranger, which in turn allows him to patrol the park while the students are out of school for the summer... ...Signage has continued to grow as new plants bloom... OUTLOOK... ...Again the weather will affect the visitation during the warmest part of the day, but we have found that early morning and later in the evening we have encountered many visitors... ...New signage has informed visitation of Catch and Release fishing only in the lake and ponds... ...Many local citizens have discovered the park that had never visited before this summer and will return as the temperature drops this Fall... 1611 All NCRP Rec /flex Review /Outlook July, 2010 The summer teen basketball program concluded on August the 16 "' The tournament had five different games decided by three points or less with the finals going overtime with the champion winning by one point. Registrations for the fall youth basketball session started on August 30 °i and through the first two days registrations are going really well Fitness memberships and exercise classes are doing really well for this time of year. We expect a really busy season and we'll be ready by offering quality programs with customer service being our primary focus. Yours in fitness, 574V s Recreation Supervisor Collier County Parks and Recreation 1611 'A11 July Athletics Activities 2010 Review /Outlook (North Collier Regional Park) As of 8/1/2010 Softball Men's Summer One Pitch league continues - 34 teams. Begin Woman's League continues - Began May It, 2010. Begin Country Club Coed League continues - 8 teams participation. Summer Sports Camp at NCRP - 46 campers involved - July 12 - 23. Golf Camp - Golden Gate Country Club - 22 participants. SOFTBALL TOURNAMENTS USSSA Youth Baseball Tournament, Summer Bash - 12 teams — July 9— 11. USSSA Youth Baseball Tournament, Summer Bash - 18 teams - -July I6— 18. Collier County Employees Golf Event— Heritage Bay -44 participants Soccer Collier County Men's 7 v 7 Open Soccer League - 16 teams registered with approximately 208 players registered and played at the North Collier Regional Park. Collier County Men's 7 v 7 Over 30 League - 12 teams registered with approximately 190 players registered and played at the North Collier Regional Park Collier County Coed Soccer League -14 teams with 196 registered players.. Collier County- Gulf Coast Youth Soccer League- Youth League- 8 teams with approximately 48 players registered. 16 1, 1 Al I Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Sun N Fun Lagoon July 2010 Monthly Report Our Swim Lessons and Water Exercise classes continue to be very popular. In July we had revenues from our Aquatic programs of over $5100 compared to $2600 in July of 2009. Our year to date program revenues are $17900 compared to $7400 last year. On July 7th Sun N Fun Lagoon over 500 people attended our Freedom Friday Event. We had a DJ and an ICEE drinking contest. Children and parents participated in the contest. The adults were very competitive and seemed to enjoy the contest as much as the children. On August 3rd Sun N Fun Lagoon partnered with the Sheriff's Office to host the Collier County Sheriff's Office National Night Out. The Bomb Squad, SWAT Team, K9 units, and CSI Unit all had activities set up for the patrons to enjoy. The Collier County Park Rangers and North Naples Fire Departments also had exhibits set up at the park. On August 2151 Sun N Fun Lagoon will be having a Back to School Bash. We will be having a DJ, Face Painting and games and prizes for participants. We also have private rentals scheduled for August 27th and 28th. Beginning August 22nd Sun N Fun Lagoon will only be open on weekends. 1611All September 15, 2010 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE, COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Naples, Florida, September 15, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 2:00 P.M. at North Collier Regional Park Exhibit Hall, 15000 Livingston Road, Naples Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: John P. Ribes VICE CHAIR: Edward "Ski" Olesky Barbara Buehler (Excused) Phil Brougham Kerry Geroy (Excused) David Saletko William Shafer ALSO PRESENT: Barry Williams, Parks & Recreation Director Kerry Runyon, Regional Manager III Nancy Olson, Regional Manager I Sidney Kittila, Operations Coordinator Shari Ferguson, Regional Manager Tony Roberto, Sr. Project Manager Rick Garby, Parks & Recreation Alexandra Solecki, Coordinator Conservation Collier V! 161 All September 15, 2010 I. Call to Order John Ribes called the meeting to order at 2:04 pm. A quorum was established. II. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation ]'he Pledge of Allegiancee was recited and hlvoeation was held. III. Approval of Agenda Edward "Ski" Olesky moved to approve the Agenda as submitted. Second by William Shafer. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. IV. Approval of August 18, 2010 Minutes Edward "Ski" Olesky moved to approve the August 18, 2010 Minutes as submitted. Second by Phil Brougham. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. V. New Business a. Employee of the Month for August Barry Williams announced the Employee of the Month for August is currently under review by Staff. He commended the entire Parks and Recreation Department for receiving the Agency Excellence Award for 2010. lie stated the Board of County Commissioners will recognize the Department on September 20th for receiving the Agency Excellence Award making them number one in the State. b. Request for Art Shows (Arts in HD) in the Parks Heidi Salekto disclosed being married to David Salckto. Dennis Goodman stated they are both artists and proprietors of Arts in HD. They started the company to promote the artists, art crafters and local businesses. They have previous experience in promoting art events and asked for permission to proceed in making arrangements to hold an "Art in the Park" art show on January 29 and /or April 30, 2011_ The event will have music and art show featuring anywhere from 30 to 230 artists that will attract additional visitors to the Park. They expressed more interest North Collier water park stating the location has plenty of parking and green areas. Discussion was made on suggested fees and donations and keeping costs down. Barry Williams stated the Parks have a current Fee Schedule for inside and outside space by the hour and Contractual Fees with a percentage to offset expenses. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved to have Staff coordinate an event (Art in the Park) with the presenters. Second by Phil Brougham. It was noted, due to the relationship of Heidi and David Saletko, the request will be forwarded to the County Attorney's Office for review. 161 1 A11 September 15, 2010 Motion carried 4 -0. David Saletko abstained. It was further noted no alcohol beverages would be served. All art work is juried by Ilcidi Salekto and Dennis Goodman prior to being exhibited. c. Recommendation to Amend the Barefoot Beach Preserve Ordinance to include Collier Conservation Alexandra Solecki reported Collier Conservation has seven preserves open to the public having potential to host multiple types of visitor use activities. She distributed a memorandum addressed to Conservation Collier band Acquisition Advisory Committee dated May 10, 2010 regarding "Reasons to Develop a County Preserve Ordinance." (See attached) fhe Parks and Recreation Ordinance No. 76 -48 is adequate to cover the basic use issues. Preserve activities differ from Parks and Recreation properties and include camping, vehicle use, hunting, allowance of leashed dogs on some larger properties and existence of cattle leases. She stressed there is a need for a "Preserve Use" Ordinance. Conservation Collier would like to combine efforts with the Parks and Recreation to develop the current Ordinance to include "Preserve Use." Barry Williams stated lie supported combining efforts with Collier Conservation to update the Ordinance. Ile further stated eventually Collier Conservation will become a part of Parks and Recreation in managing all parks and preserve lands ill Collier County. Discussion was made on combining efforts and how the preserve land would affect the Annual Updated Inventory Report (AUIR) and it was determined it be categorized "unusable land" and would not affect the AUIR. Nancy Olson state a blanket Preserve Ordinance for all Collier County managed lands makes sense. The Ordinance will govern use of preserves and whoever manages them. It was noted Collier Conservation has funds to acquire more land. Phil Brougham moved to direct Parks and Recreations Management to continue to work with Conservation Collier toward a unified "Draft" Ordinance far fee management. Second by David Saletko. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The "Draft" Ordinance will be presented to the Advisory Board for review at a fzrture meeting. Phil Brougham moved to review "Draft" Ordinance prior to bringing to the Board t?f County Commissioners. Second by David Saletko. Motion carried mraninrously 5 -0. 1b 1 1 All September 15, 2010 VI. Old Business a. Parks Master Plan Sidney Kittila reported a letter was mailed to over 70 individuals from the Community inviting them to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Focus Group Building Workshop scheduled for October 1416 at North Collier Park from 9:00 to 3:00 pm. The Workshop purpose will be to gather input from participants relating to the preliminary needs identified for the Master Plan. No one has declined but not all responses have been received. Barry Williams stated the results from the Master Plan Focus Group will be presented to the Advisory Board and the Planning Commission for direction. b. 2010 Annual Update Inventory Report Sidney Kitilla recommended the Advisory Board recommends to the Board of County Commissioners approval of the Proposed AUIR FY 1 1 -15. The recommendation will be presented on September 20, 2010. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved to approve the AUIR per Staff recommendations for FY11 to 15. Second by Phil Brougham. Barry Williams suggested to Advisory Board add specifically 'Tor Regional. and Community Parks." John Rihes moved to make a recommendation to approve the AUIR per Staff recommendations for Regional and Community Parks FYI to 15. Second by Phil Brougham. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. VIL Marketing Highlights — Review of Website Shari Ferguson reported the Project Star GolFfournarnent has sponsors for all 18 holes and will be held Sunday, September 19i'. She gave a hands -on wcbsite (collierparks.com) presentation on the "work in progress" a large projection screen. Phil Brougham left at 3:10 prn Shari Ferguson demonstrated the On -Line Registration, Parks Map and wcbsite searches available and reviewed the Home page categories. Phil Brougham returned al 3.15 Pin. Barry Williams expressed the Department would like to post the Advisory Boards photographs on the Website and stated Tona Nelson will contact them. 1611 A11 September 15, 2010 Shari Ferguson urged the Advisory Board to visit the website and offer any suggestions and recommendations. VIII. Recreation Highlights — FRPA Conference Sidney Kitilla gave a slide presentation on the Florida Recreation Parks Association Conference sharing pictures of the Staff during the event. 'fhe event assists Staff with networking, keeping updated with park and recreation trends and Continued Education Units (CFU) required by State. IX. Capital Project Highlight — Project Review Tony Roberto distributed and reviewed The Capital Project Update dated September 13, 2010. (See attached) He reported status on the following: Golden Gate Community Center — FZ Shutters was low bidder. Gordon River Greenway Park -30% drawings to be approved by end of September 2010 Golden Gate Community Park Regrade Fields — Working with 'Turf and Irrigation to establish drainage between two softball fields to eliminate standing water Immokalce Sports Drainage — Well is scheduled for completion by end of September 2010 Port of the Islands Cork Screw Lake Road Access - -work is completed. Aquagnixs completed spraying the lake. Margood Resort Land.- waiting on FCf to respond to Architect and Civil historic Preservation comments. North Collier Regional Park—Consultant and Underground (utility contractor) will commence working by end of September 2010 Golden Gate By-Pass — working on easement issues He reported receiving quotes from an Exotic Contractor for Fast Naples, Oaks Park, Veterans Park and Sugden Park. X. Turf &c Irrigation Update Rick Garby gave a slide presentation on turf conditions and maintenance on all parks. He described the maintenance provided at each field with before and after pictures to show results. He stated turf was only a fraction of their job description and the crews fix irrigation systems, repair equipment and do carpentry work. Phil Brougham left at 3:55' pm XI. Adopt a Park David Saletko reported on Cocohatchce River Park and Conner Park He stated the Cocohatchee River Park Marina lines have disappeared and suggested painting them. XII. Director's Highlights XIII. XIV 1611 A11 September 15, 2010 Barry Williams announced the Tourism Development Council (fDC) will be holding a Workshop in December. Ile reported a Grand Opening will be held on October 9 at 10:00 am to dedicate the Goodland Boating Park. The Advisory Board names will be placed on a plaque installed on the building. A meeting on the Gordon River Greenway Park has been scheduled with the Staff and the Stakeholders to discuss project issues. Informational Items — None. Public Comments /Board Member Comments David Saletko suggested offering a field usage credit to groups when they use the field alter a certain number of uses. The Staff responded the Fee Schedule was set up to cover expenses and not to make a profit; they can not waive fees and not looking for more use. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 4:23 PM. COLLIER COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Chairman John P. Ribes These Minutes were approved by the Committee /Board on i(> Lc, t V presented ___X or as amended as Fiala _ - ! 1 A 1 1 ills OEC 13 2010 Henning - October 20, 2010 Coyle ij.oarr- of (:aunty Comr5+x�5ipners COletta _ - MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Naples, Florida, October 20, 2010 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 2:00 P.M. at North Collier Regional Park Exhibit Hall, 15000 Livingston Road, Naples Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: John P. Ribes VICE CHAIR: Edward "Ski" Olesky Barbara Buehler Phil Brougham Kerry Geroy (Absent) David Saletko William Shafer (Absent) ALSO PRESENT: Barry Williams, Parks & Recreation Director Kerry Runyon, Regional Manager III Nancy Olson, Regional Manager Sidney Kittila, Operations Coordinator Tona Nelson, Administrative Assistant Peg Ruby, Marketing Specialist Annie Alvarez, Regional Manager II Vickie Wilson, Community Center Supervisor Ray Coriano, Parks and Recreation Jack Wert, Tourism Development Director Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Mgmt. DirwW6 ,S: Meryl Rorer, Parks and Recreation Gary Stieg, Parks and Recreation Date: Item #: 161 All Cjetober 20, 2010 L Call to Order Edward "Ski" Olesky called the meeting to order at 2:03 PM. A quorum was established. 11. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation The Pledge of Allegiance was recited and Invocation was held. III. Approval of Agenda Barbara Buehler moved to approve the Agenda as submitted Second by Phil Brougham. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. IV. Approval of September 15, 2010 Minutes Phil Brougham moved to approve the September 15, 2010 Minutes as submitted Second by David Saletko. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. V. New Business a. Employee of the Month for August and September Sidney Kittila announced the Employee of the Month for August and September 2010. Edward "Ski" Olesky commended and presented the following outstanding individuals with the "Employee of the Month' award. Y August —Peg Ruby — Marketing, Project Star and Fund Raising r September — Ray Coriano — Specialty Field, BMX Races b. Recommendation and Approval for the International Festival to Sell Alcohol at Sugden Park Jim Gaitens, a representative for the International Festival, requested approval to sell alcohol at the 2 °d International Festival at Sugden Park sponsored by St. Peter the Apostle Catholic Church on February 26 and 27. He stated last year the event attracted over 5,000 visitors and they did not have any problems with the selling of alcohol. A Sheriff Deputy was on site. He distributed an article written by Lance Shearer, Daily News Correspondent — International Festival in Naples Celebrates Cultural Diversity. (See attached) It was noted the sale of alcohol at the parks would be limited to beer. Barbara Buehler moved to recommend the sale of alcohol at the International Festival held at Sugden Park on February 26 and 27subject to normal conditions and supervised by Parks and Recreation. Second by Phil Brougham. Motion carried 4 -0. It was further noted the Advisory Boards recommendation would be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for their approval. c. Recommendation and Approval for Tigertail Concessionaire to Sell Alcohol at Tigertail Beach 2 1611811 October 20, 2010 Tony Smith, Concessionaire for 23- years, requested approval to sell beer and wine with lunch and for sunsets. lie stated the nearest hotel is approximately 1.5- miles away. Visitors often cancel orders because the beer sale is not an option. The Advisory Board asked many questions and expressed many concerns. Some concerns were: • Setting a president • Liabilities • Quality of the beach • Accidents • Disorderly conduct • Concessionaire training for serving alcohol. It was noted the County receives 12% of every dollar from concession sales. David Saletko suggested events be held on the beach (Volleyball "Tournaments) to attract more visitors with possible additional income from concessions. I le was not in favor of alcohol sales in the park. Phil Brougham moved to direct Staff to provide historical data on sales before and after the sale of beer and wine approval, a record of any complaints or disruptions at Clam Pass and input from the Purchasing Department regarding the sale alcohol. Second by David Saletko. Discussion was ensued regarding the sale of alcohol on park premises. The Advisory Board had different opinions and decided historical data would assist them in making a recommendation. Motion carried 4 -0. d. Standards for Background checks for Volunteers Meryl Rorer distributed and reviewed Volunteer Standards. The purpose is to provide guidelines for the application and screening process of volunteers. (See attached) She distributed Volunteer "l'- shirts to the Advisory Board who are a part of the volunteer base. Last year Parks and Recreation had 648 volunteers who worked 47,200 hours which equates to saving the County $760,000. It was noted the State of Florida passed a law as of July 1" requiring any one who volunteers to coach sports have criminal background checks. The cost for background checks are normally $70. The County has a contract with Southeast Security Criminal Investigation to provide a complete criminal background check for $18.50 each. Volunteers who have passed the criminal background check will wear identification badges. Meryl Rorer stated 135- Volunteers have been screened. 4- Volunteers were found guilty of an offense. 1 out of 135 - Volunteers will not be allowed to coach. Barry Williams recommended the Advisory Board endorse the recommendation for Volunteer Standards as presented by National Parks and Recreation 16 ► All Olober 20, 2010 Association (NPRA.) The Consultants recommended not altering the guidelines. He reviewed the Misdemeanors Recommended Criteria as follows: • All misdemeanor violence offenses within the past 7- years. • All misdemeanor drug & alcohol offenses within the past 5 -years or multiple offenses in the past 10- years. • Ay other misdemeanor within the past 5 -years that would be considered a potential danger to children or is directly related to the functions of that volunteer. Barry Williams noted if a Coach had 1 offense in the last 5- years, that person would not be allowed to coach until that Coach had "0" offenses in the last 5- years. Some communities have adopted multiple offenses in a 10 -year period versus 1 in a 5 -year period. Gary Stieg urged the Advisory Board to take in to consideration that a DUI is not dangerous to kids. He stated one of the Coaches, who coached for several years, is now being penalized due to the misdemeanor by not being allowed to continue coaching. Barry Williams stated the NPRA Volunteer Standards are very fair and high level of coaching in youth sports is desired. Staff reiterated the Staff recommendation is to adopt the Volunteer Standards as presented. Discussion was made on the number of DUls recommended and reasons to modify or not to modify. John Ribes arrived al 2:52 pm Phil Brougham moved to recommend adoption of Volunteer Standards as presented. No second was made. Edward "Ski" Olesky moved to recommend adoption of the Volunteer Standards with an exception to 2 -DUIs in a 5 year period. Annie Alvarez stated Parks and Recreation have a commitment to parents too. Coaches have responsibilities to the kids especially when mentoring. Collier County Parks and Recreation is an Accredited Agency through NRA and required to meet recommended state guidelines. It was noted criminal background checks are required annually Second by Phil Brougham. Motion not carried. 3 -2, Barbara Buehler and David Saletko opposed e. Bluebill Road Beach Access Improvements —Discussed ufler VI. a. V t. Old Business 4 1611 All October 20, 2010 a. Long Term Options for Tourism Development Council (TDC) Funding Jack Wert gave a slide presentation on The Need for Funding Year - Round. (See attached) The Board of County Commissioners requested Staff return to funding sources and reviewed: • 'The current Collier Tourist Tax Structure. • How Collier marketing compare to other destinations. • Possible reallocation of TDT uses to support year -round destination marketing. • How tourism benefits our Community. • July, August and September tourism was down due to oil spill. • Current tourist tax allocations. Reserve capped at $1.5 million. • Current Reserve is at $400,000 due to using funds on oil spill not yet replenished by Federal Funding. • Current funding per TDT Category based on $12 million - ➢ Cat. A — Beach & Beach Park Facilities $6,000,000 ➢ Cat. B — Marketing, Administration, Emergency Advertising Reserves $4,400,000 y Cat. Cl- Museum Operations $1,300,000 Y Cat. C2- Non - County Museum Grants $ 300,000 Jack Wert reviewed Marketing Budget Comparisons at $2, $3, $4 and $5 million. He stated $5 million is what is needed to compete with other destinations. Ile reviewed and compared Tourist Tax Comparisons, Total Tourist Tax Collections. Marketing Budget per Lodging Unit, Advertising & Promotion Budgets and Beach Project Budgets with other Florida destinations. He asked the Advisory Board if they agreed Collier County needs to promote to visitors year - round. The Advisory Board formed a consensus there is a need for year -round destination marketing. Jack Wert reviewed possible solutions "What Options are Available' ?" as follows: Category A Reduce percentage or allocations to Beach Renourishment, to Beach Park Facilities and replace with General Fund or Parking Revenues. Y Category B Little can be done to free up more funds for marketing. ➢ Category C1 Reduce Operating Funds Allocation over 3 years and replace with General Funds and /or Admissions Fees. Y Category C2 Reduce Grant Funding and replace with co -op advertising. Phil Brougham suggested TDC find ways and means to raise money by holding large events. He also suggested TDC partnership with national organizations on Marco Island and charge admission costs. 1614 All October 20, 2010 Barry Williams expressed concern regarding "What Options are Available — Category A - Beach Park Facilities and replace with General Fund or Parking Revenues. He stated Parks and Recreation uses the (parking fee of $8 per day) revenues to offset Operating Expenses for a limited number of Staff. Ile stated non - residents arc charged a parking fee. Residents are not charged a parking fee because it was considered to be a part of property taxes. He suggested considering charging residents and use as an alternate funding source. He urged the Advisory Board make the reaffirmation with the exception to not use Beach Park Facilities Operating Expenses for Capital Improvement. b. TDC Funding Options Gary McAlpin stated Funding Options are about reallocation of funds. Visitors come to Collier County for the `Beach Experience." He noted Collier County does not receive Federal Funding and are not working off a 50 -year Grant. In August 2010, the Advisory Board approved $1 million as a one -time occurrence. Jack Wert introduced Steve McIntyre, a representative of Alliance Hotels, to give a business community point -of -view. Steve McIntyre reported the hotels generate all the revenue. Revenues went up from 2009 to 2010 in the amount of $65,000. He stated 1 -penny in additional taxes will create a negative effect on all hotels and hotels hosting special events. He stated when groups call to book hotel facilities for special events, the groups look for the best deal. Hotels do not want the additional penny tax. Cary McAlpin asked the Advisory Board for reaffirmation of the motions made at the August meeting and to develop a Resolution to be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners Workshop on November 1, 2010. Phil Brougham moved the Advisory Board reaffirm the 4 motions made at the August meeting with the exception the Advisory Board objects to the option under Category A in regards to reducing percentage or allocations to Beach Park Facilities and replacing with General Fund or Parking Revenues and to direct Parks and Recreation Staff to develop a Resolution that expresses the Advisory Boards concerns, to address the 4- motions and give the Chair authorization to sign the Resolution to be submitted on November Is` to the Board of County Commissioners for approval. Second by Barbara Buehler. Motion carried 5 -0. V. Old Business c. Bluebill Road Beach Access Improvements Gary McAlpin distributed and reviewed the Moraya Bay Beach Tower- Blue Beach Access turnaround aerial photograph. He reported the following: • Partnered Project with Moraya Beach. • Expanded parking from 45 spaces to 95 spaces. • Includes a drop -off for beach access, 3- handicap ramps, restrooms and shuttle. 6 1611AII Octo er 2010 • Elevated turnaround to be installed will address congestion problems, keep traffic moving and provide access to park- Phil Brougham left at 3:58 pm • Project is in Conceptual Stages. • A public meeting will be held in November for public input. • Funding will come from Moraya Bay and TDC. • Permits will be in place by January 1, 2011. • Construction will begin in May, 2011. Phil Brougham returned at 4:02 pm Phil Brougham moved to approve the Conceptual Design. Second by David Saletko. Motion carried 5 -0. VI. New Business c. Promotional Issues Utilizing Athletic Fields Barry Williams addressed a suggestion made by David Saletko on field rental promotions. (Example - rent field 10 times and get one free) He sited Resolution No. 2010 -201 establishes Outdoor Areas License and Fee Policy. This Policy supersedes and replaced the Policy as eslablished in Resolution No. 2010 -25. Barry Williams stated the Resolution allows the Parks and Recreation Director to modify fees on a case by case basis. He distributed a chart reflecting the % o/ Hours Athletic Field Are in Use. (See attached) He stated Athletic Fields are currently at 84.3% Usage and could not justify modifying fees to add more usage on fields. VII. Marketing Highlights — Halloween Events Peg Ruby passed out Halloween Treats to the Advisory Board and reported the following: .- Halloween Events scheduled to be held from October 22 -30 at Collier Parks. (See attached) Y Fall Festival scheduled to be held at Eagle Lakes Community Park from October 28 -31 featuring carnival rides, interactive games and refreshments. Proceeds will benefit Project Star. Y 25° Annual Snow Fest scheduled to be held at Golden Gate Community Park on Santa Barbara on December 4 from 10 AM — 5 PM. VIII. Recreation Highlights — BMX Races Ray Coriano and Annie Alvarez gave a slide presentation on Bicycle Moto Cross (BMX) Program. Ray Coriano reported the following: • Golden Gate Community Center's (GGCC) Track is sanctioned by the National Bicycle League. • BMX `l rack adheres to all State of Florida governing rules. 7 1611 All October 20, 2010 • Sunshine State BMX selects tracks for all State events. • GGCC track was selected to hold the Summer Series Event held on September 25 and 26. • The Summer Series Event attracted 250 riders from around the State of Florida. • Professional Mike Keppes volunteered to hold a BMX Rider Clinic. • Impact includes - a sense of pride to local riders, increase in Local and County revenues, increases GGCC BMX Track an opportunity for the State Season Series nomination. • State Season Series Event will attract 500 — 700 riders. Ray Coriano reported the track is well maintained and modifications are made to make the jumps bigger. Staff proudly announced the GGCC BMX Summer Series Event had not received any write -ups from the State. Annie Alvarez reported purchasing 2 -tents to provide a better staging area for BMX events. IX. Adopt A Park — None. X. Director's Highlights Barry Williams thanked the Advisory Board for attending the Master Plan Workshop. Staff stated recommendations on the Master Plan will be submitted to the Advisory Board in January. The Master Plan is due at the Board of County Commissioners in December. Staff anticipates submitting the Master Plan to the Board of County Commissioners in February 2011. He announced the Board of County Commissioners approved the increase of Boat Launch Fees to $8 effective November 1, 2010. He reported being approached by Diana Worrall, AHD at the Master Plan Workshop. She volunteered to serve on a Parks and Recreation Subcommittee to address ADA Standard issues and to report to the Advisory Board periodically. He distributed Diana Worrall's resume for the Board's review. (See attached) Barry Williams suggested using her expertise in ADA Compliance and to expand disabilities programs. He requested feedback or suggestions on the concept from the Board. Staff will contact the County Attorney's office on whether the subcommittee concept is practical. Barry Williams recognized a Staff member who quickly responded to an emergency and saved a man's life who was playing basketball. He was suffering a heart attack. When Staff revived him, he did not know where he was. The man telephoned Parks and Recreation to express his gratitude to the Staff. XI. Informational Items — None. 161.1 All October 20, 2010 XIl. public Comments /Board Member Comments Public Bob Buchan expressed the desire to address the Advisory Board with a power point presentation at the next meeting. Phil Brougham expressed concern on some member attendance records and the possibility of not having a quorum. Ile requested William Shafer's attendance be addressed. Barry Williams stated attendance records are kept and there is a policy in place. John Ribes stated the Attendance Policy should be implemented. Barry Williams stated Kerry Geroy telephoned to express concerns on not being able to continue serving on the Board. David Saletko reported an exposed piece of aluminum on player's bench, located on the southeast field at the Santa Barbara Community Park and the North Collier Park scoreboards not working. Staff responded they will investigate the exposed piece of aluminum on players bench and investigate why the remote devices are not working. Barbara Buehler commented on [lie Master Plan Workshop being great and very informative. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 4:45 PM. COLLIER COUNTY PART <S &c RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD These Minutes were approved by the Committee /Board on __ kii- M 1 O -,as presented or as amended -. "IALLOWEEN HAPPENINGS October 22 October 26 October 29 Halloween Happening Halloween Trunk or Treat Ghost & Goblin 6 p.m. -8 p.m. • $1 Cupcake Craft 6:30 p.m. -8:30 p.m. • $2 Costume Party East Naples Community Park 4:30 p.m. -5:30 p.m. • $7 Max Hasse Community Park 10:30 a.m. -12 p.m. • $10 Family Halloween Ball Vineyards Community Park Preschool Veterans Community Park 7 p.m. -9 p.m. • $15 Halloween Jam Halloween Vineyards Community Park 6 p.m. -8:30 p.m. • $10 Special Event October 30 Max Hasse Community Park 8:30 p.m. -11:30 p.m. • $S' Trick or Treat on the Boardwalk Family Halloween Event Immokalee 3 p.m. -S p.m. • Free • Freedom Park 3 p.m. -6 p.m, • Free Sports Complex _,��_ Immokalee Community Park _—AL_ O � a 9 ,0 r w Q w v t V i u v 0 T v 0 C Q V O T =1 v WI N r v E 'Q Ln d b V _ ro = ro � =Y =o u 33Y T U C M rod• 6 'L' T! Y 7 Q = 7 _o N a ti 0 'O '6 2 t O ro we <� u 0 a r� w a •14 t 041 y/ e O o N'r y W N P? CA 0 o.wa Y. a F a u 1;V N y _r v 0. A� T d g o � c m 8 z z N LL Lij y zw z� ory� L O Q �T H 09 1 W 2Z J W v IL F? 0 a r� w a •14 t 041 y/ e O o N'r y W N P? CA 0 o.wa Y. a F a u 1;V N y _r v 0. A� T d g o � c m 8 z U d F-J �� .. t__J 0 Sz° � O J o F-J �� .. t__J 0 Sz° � O J es ! /A� 1 4N. Eagle Lakes Community Park 11565 Tamiaml Trail E. Oct. 28 - Oct. 31 Oct. 28 -29 — 6 p.m. -ii p.m. Oct. 30 — 4 p.m. -ii p.m. Oct. 31 — 2 p.m. -8 p.m. 793.4414 www.collierparks.com FREE ADMISSION October 22 Halloween Happening 6 p.m. -8 p.m. a $1 East Naples Community Park Family Halloween Ball 7 p.m.-9 p.m. • $15 Vineyards Community Park WEEN [APPENINGS October 26 Halloween Cupcake Craft : 4:30 p.m 5:30 p.m. • $7 Vineyards Community Par Trick or October n October 29 Trunk or Treat Ghost & Goblin 6:30 p.m.-8:30 p.m. • $2 Costume Party Max Hasse Community Park 10:30 a.m:12 p.m. • $10 Pork Preschool Veterans Community Park Halloween Jam Halloween 6 p.m. -8:30 p.m. • $10 Special Event Max Hasse Community Park 8:30 p.m. -11:30 p.m. • $5 Treat on the Boardwalk Family Halloween Event 3 p.m. -5 p.m. • Free • Freedom Park 3 p.m. -6 p.m. • Free mmokalee Community Park Immokalee Sports Complex �c �jp�� O �. n C n r-� m�" � E z :P. O y C. �y diri G.n y N� .rt7'S M w m n n �.,�w d y N ►pai K �N�`o•x�� m oayyFwAolona 0 m rt n c° 7Q -MM Goy� 0 SEn0�xro�o rm •a �— „max ^N pt ow d o 5 � . a �v Too d on N• N y m m y � w °O 0.10 04 0. , S^. am cr 0. DG0 �a CL �C.'� °p -� `C O iX ym w_Nbg5'�.�eD m rtav fD tj 0 r�oK 0�5 b o N o m n C 'ob°50m d o ti m .05ey�Do 'tZo�,a5 . °o wf50 o 5 °w 5w� 5m"1°wtz D ° ° 5'aww °c .°,y Nnm W n ro rttr'SNO- E'On9y�o�,r°i+ 5 o b'0 N 0. y �. 0 �. o� S'Owae�wn0m�w 0. w� °H� °a a n ° x'n c 0 CL c v, eT m f5D 5 Q N M O a .- n Z� w w w P �/Onr an N^ .^. ❑5m5•.O��P.mdtaCC N.n^ Wap�d "1 T n (•gyp• y fE fn T ryw WN O° y r5 0 0 0 �o n y m` an w ry ate.^ v5 y b n �, N O W �, rv:N qQ nG M W ��j N N kN QO y p N o I� < fD m uw,b a ^m ?'�. a.p 75bww � °'<�50 •• oo F c: e!: - ,:; o Q, ' °o SD �+r'�P'i�17' rvKi'w ��•iy°y`<nn��°i ,�c� <,d - A'j�ro �� no ��+ o '�O � � r<o o N b a�Q•��o•h!� ano a ..'�m5, nom om5 °»,n rro �� w�.�!tb5'y o•o �r°.w��'�i7m fD ~'�fb�p �n� co N roc .w. o 5 1.0 o R. 0 ti oc x a a T T a:b 2: 6� � °ok ] as LI j A g l! b I N I� o cn N� CD V/ '' i l; 161 IfAII Volunteer Standards 1b�1A11 Recommended Criteria for Exclusion A person should be disqualified and prohibited from serving as a volunteer if the person has been found guilty of the following crimes: Guilty means that a person was found guilty following a trial, entered a guilty plea, entered a no contest plea accompanied by a court finding of guilty, regardless of whether there was an adjudication of guilt (conviction) or a withholding of guilt. This recommendation does not apply if criminal charges resulted in acquittal, Nolle Prosse, or dismissal. SEX OFFENSES All Sex Offenses - Regardless of'the amountaf'tirne since offense. Examples include: child molestation, rape, sexual assault, sexual battery, sodomy, prostitution, solicitation, indecent exposure, etc. FELONIES All Felony Violence — Regardless gf'the amount of time since offense. Examples include: murder, manslaughter, aggravated assault, kidnapping robbery, aggravated Burglary, etc. • All Felony offenses other than violence or sex within the past 10 years. Examples include: drug offenses, theft, embezzlement fraud child endangerment, etc. MISDEMEANORS All misdemeanor violence offenses within the past 7 years Examples include: simple assault, battery, domestic violence, hit & run, etc. • All misdemeanor drug .& alcohol offenses within the past 5 years or multiple offenses in the past 10 years. Examples include: driving under the influence, simple drug possession, drunk and disorderly, public intoxication, possession of drugparaphernalia, etc. • Any other misdemeanor within the past 5 years that would be considered a potential danger to children or is directly related to the functions of that volunteer. Example include: contributing to the delinquency of a minor, providing alcohol to a minor, theft— ifperson is handling monies, etc. COLLIER COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL SUBJECT: Volunteer Staff 161 1 EFFECTIVE DATE: Draft REVISED: All 4 PAGE: 1 of 2 CATEGORY: Volunteer Program NUMBER: 001 POLICY: The purpose is to provide guidelines for the utilization of volunteers for Collier County Parks and Recreation (CCPRD). It is the intent of CCPRD to ensure background screening of volunteers and to ensure adherence to related Statutes, Ordinances and professional standards and County Manager Agency's politics and procedures in the utilization of volunteers. PROCEDURE: It is the practice of CCPRD to utilize volunteers on the basis of their interests, skills, aptitudes and experience as those skills can assist the department to service the needs of its citizens and visitors. It is the practice of the CCPRD to oiler volunteer opportunities to all persons as needed without regard to race, creed, color, sex, age, national origin, religion, special needs, or marital status. Volunteer assistance is for the purpose of extending citizen services beyond what is provided for in the operational budget. Volunteers should never replace yard staff. Volunteers will be expected to perform in cooperation with the organization's staff and comply with organization guidelines at all times. Volunteers shall be designated as either a Regular Service VOI Wlteer or Episodic Volunteer. Directive The Department Director will ensure that the stipulations of all applicable statutes, ordinances and County Manager CMAs are followcd in the utilization of volunteer services. 'I'll is includes, but is not limited to Chapter 125, Florida Statutev, CMAs: 5204, F/eetMcrnagementSystem, 531 l.l, Standcncls of Conduct, 5805, Eligihility to thrive CCPRD Vehicles, 5390 Backgrotmcl Checks and 5385, Recruitment and Selection. Definitions: Regular Service Volunteer An individual who is engaged in specific voluntary service activities on an on -going or continual basis is classified as a Regular Service Volunteer. This includes repeat seasonal volunteers. Requirements: must be a minimum of 13 years of age complete a Volunteer Application pass required background check attend Volunteer Orientation display at all times photographic identification badge that demonstrates clearance as a Parks and Recreation volunteer 16 11 1 Episodic Service Volunteer A volunteer who provides a one -time or short -term service. Requirements: must be a minimum of 13 years of age register intent to participate prior to each event Clubs, groups or inclividuals assisting with special events or short -term projects, should complete the appropriate registration form and releases for their category of service. Volunteer Management A. Volunteers must perform assigunnents within the rules set by the Parks and Recreation Department Director. Volunteers may be excused from service if work rules are not followed. B. The volunteer must comply with the intent of the Collier County CMAs, including CMA 531 1.1, Standards ofConducl. Failure to do so may result in being excused from volunteer service. C. The CCPRD supervisor must ensure that the volunteer is adequately trained to carry out his /her assigned functions. The CCPRD supervisor is responsible for the proper execution of all tasks performed by his assigned volunteers. The volunteer must be given copies of any additional departmental guidelines used in managing volunteer services. The service hours of each volunteer mist be tracked and reported on a monthly basis to Tile Volunteer Coordinator by the G °i of the following month. The vohmtccr coordinator will report served hours to the Risk Management Department on a yearly basis. E. Any performance issues should be discussed with the volunteer coordinator and documented on a Volunteer Staff Conference Report. These reports are public records, and should be forwarded to the Department Volunteer Coordinator to be placed in their file. F. It is recommended that all regular service volunteers have an annual review, which should be docmnented on the Volunteer Annual Review form. These torus should be forwarded to the Department Volunteer Coordinator, Volunteer Recognition CCPRD will provide for the recognition of volunteers who have offered continuous and outstanding service, as per Title X Chapter 110 Part IV and Title XI Chapter 125 Part VI, Florida Statutes. Such recognition may be in the form of framed certificates, plaques, or other tokens ofrecognition to honor, reward, or encourage volunteers for their service. Volunteer Benefits. A. Volunteers are entitled to such benefits as described in Chapter 125, Florida Stalules. B. Volunteers are covered by Workers' Compensation as referenced in Chapter 440, Norida Statutes. 16 1 1 All COLLIER COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL SUBJECT: Volunteer Application and Screening /Selection EFFECTIVE DATE Draft REVISED: PAGE: 'I of 1 CATEGORY: Volunteer Program NUMBER: 002 POLICY: The purpose is to provide guidelines for the application and screening process of volunteers. PROCEDURE: A. Volunteer Applications: (1) Applications for volunteer positions must be completed on the County's Volunteer Application form. These should be completed on -line whenever possible. paper applications may be accepted as necessary. Paper applications should be retained by the Department Volunteer Coordinator. B. Screening /Selection: (1) All selection decisions shall be based on the match of the volunteer's qualifications to the requirements of the assignment. (2) Interviews for volunteers, who meet the assignment requirements, will be coordinated by the volunteer coordinator or the site supervisor. (3) Volunteer candidates for assignments requiring background screenings must not be informed that they have been selected as a volunteer until all necessary backgrounds checks and screenings have been completed and reviewed by the Department Director or their designee, whichever is applicable as indicated on the assignment description. 'These checks may include, but arc not limited to social security check, department of motor vehicle records, statewide and national criminal background checks and social trace. We currently utilize Southeastern Security Consultants, Inc. through the TI C2 program associated with the National Recreation and Parks Association. Departments will be responsible for the costs associated with these background checks. (4) Volunteers should never he guaranteed future permanent employment. They are not entitled to internal preference for hiring. (5) No person who has a conflict of interest or a perceived conflict of interest with any activity or program of the agency, whether personal, philosophical, or financial shall be accepted or serve as a volunteer with the agency. (6) Knowingly providing fraudulent or Izdse st temcnts on any application or examination may be deemed cause for the exclusion of such application from consideration and /or for excusing the volunteer from service. COLLIER COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL 1611All EFFECTIVE DATE: Draft REVISED: SUBJECT: Volunteer On Site Management PAGE: 1 of 3 CATEGORY: Volunteer Program NUMBER 003 POLICY: The purpose is to provide direction to volunteer supervisors at our community parks, community centers and beach venues. PROCEDURE: Please refer to Volunteer Staff Standards of Operating procedures (SOP) 001 for basic guidelines. The following procedures occur when a volunteer applies at your venue. Once you have spoken with the individual and decided you waut him /her to work at Your facility, have them complete the Volunteer Application. Ensure the application is completed in its' entirety and be sure all necessary forms (parental consent or RSVP) are attached prior to sending to the Volunteer Coordinator. A background check will be completed on the individual. This process takes about seven (7) business days. Once the person is cleared to start volunteering, you will receive a confirmation that you can begin scheduling the volunteer. IF the individual does not clear the background check, the V011-ntcer Coordinator will contact you and send a letter to the individual letting them know who to contact in case there is a misunderstanding. "The Volunteer Coordinator cannot discuss any personal /sensitive information about the potential volunteer with anyone but the applicant. She does not make the final decision, but solicits the recommendation of 1IR and /or the county attorney. Please do not contact the applicant to discuss this situation. If the applicant wants to talk to someone about the decision, have them contact the Volunteer Coordinator. Recruiting Regular Volunteers • Prominently display the county approved volunteer recruitment poster at your venue. • You are your best recruiter. Make all staff aware of your volunteer needs and have them recruit as well. Many ofyour patrons can be your future volunteers. • Make your volunteers aware that you are looking for additional help. They may have friends and family interested in volunteering. • The volunteer coordinator recruits regularly through outreach in the conurnunity. Revised 03 -15 -10 1611 All Recruiting Episodic Volunteers • When you have a special event in your facility and you need voluntcer staff, add a line or two to your program flyer stating that volunteers are needed and print your name and contact phone number. • Contact current volunteer staff working in your facility and inquire if they can assist. Current volunteers may have friends and /or relatives interested in episodic voluutccring. Contact the Volunteer Coordinator for assistance. Volunteer Training • The VOlniteei' Site Supervisor is responsible for all training of his /her Volunteer Staff. • Construct well defined volunteer position descriptions with your volunteer coordinator that identity the job features as well as highlight the benefits. Be sure you are matching the right individual to the right position. (fhe volunteer coordinator has somejob descriptions already written). • Define and communicate your expectations to them. Review their duties and encourage questions. • Guide and support them on an on -going basis. Give your volunteers instructions, directions, feedback, corrections, information and the freedom they need to perform their duties well. Volunteer Reporting • "I he V011lnteer Supervisor will maintain a binder with individual volunteer tinesheets. Fach volunteer will sign in and record hours worked every time they volunteer. Regular Volunteer staff that work "off- site" and will be keeping their own timesheet, will record their hours and submit their timesheet to their supervisor or place in the binder at the end of each month. Volunteers who work only at special events will sign in and out on the Special Event Sign -in Sheet. • Monthly, hours will be tallied by volunteer narne and number of hours served and recorded in the g -drive under monthly reports (volunteer hours — all parks) • 'I he volunteer coordinator logs all the hours into the Volunteer reporter database that can provide a variety of documents for many purposes. These reports are will also be used to provide information to P &R Director, I IR, Risk and CCPRAB. If you would like some statistics for your area, contact the volunteer coordinator. • Volunteer Staff (55 +) that choose to be registered with our partner, Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) get additional insurance while volunteering and also take advantage of special recognition events. RSVP requires that volunteer hours are reported to them by the volunteer coordinator ASAP after the end of each quarter. For this reason, it is essential you submit your volunteer hours in a timely manner. Volunteer appreciation • Ensure that your volunteers feel rewarded, appreciated and recognized. This is all about setting the cnvironnent, structuring the experience, treating them well and valuing their contribution. If all staff values volunteer service, this will happen Revised 03 -15 -10 1611 All naturally. Take the time to nominate them for awards, submit articles featuring your volunteer's efforts in the newsletter. "fhe smallest things matter: always say hello, ask how the job is going & be prepared to listen; thank them genuinely and appropriately. Volunteer Discipline • Contact the Volunteer Coordinator and make her aware of the situation. o Review written job description and discuss what is expected of the volunteer. Give the volunteer an opportunity to explain reasons for the problem. a A Conference Report Form will help you document and organize this discussion. It is a tool that can be used at any time by request of either the Volunteer's Supervisor or the volunteer. Together, come up with a solution to keep the problem for rcoccwring and document the resolution. o Keep a copy of the Conference Report Form in the volunteer's file and send original to Volunteer Coordinator. o If you feel there is real value to this volunteer, but not in his /her specific job, discuss reassigning the volunteer staff to anotherjob within your facility or in another location within the Parks Department. Rcfer them back to the volunteer coordinator to discuss this possibility. Volunteer Termination • First and foremost, respect the volunteer's privacy and dignity. If after coaching the volunteer and completing a Conference Report form, he /she does not stem able to perform the joh; it is time to confront the situation. • Again, documentation, via the Conference Report form, is necessary. There is a real risk in not confronting the situation. Not only will the work be done poorly, other volunteers will see that your standards are low. • A Volunteer Conference Report should be submitted to the volunteer coordinator within 24 hours of the termination. • 'file volunteer should be made aware at the time of termination that he /she has 10 days to comment on or dispute the termination in writing and submit this document to the volunteer coordinator. You will be notified if volunteer chooses to dispute the termination. Revised 03 -15 -10 16111 FOS] \�f . . . . . 16111 Al __� ! \)] } \{ U) 3 m CD a� o' I i • 1 4- 4- mr I r y y0 1 0 I� =glZ 1,4411 Ir r a I , I I • 1 4- 4- mr I r y y0 1 0 I� =glZ 1,4411 Ir r a m v m CD 0) o' 1611 R r IU 1 I 0O o zp ( <� T O G R 1 N I i All Rm CD m CD v o' 3 1611A11 I I 4- m I I m 2 OV G 1 W Zp DT O S 0 Z 0 3 m CD v 0 0 Y 11 m mr T r I r fm' -a I 0 n 0 0 1 0) 161 'All w � P b � 16 I 1 A11 4 TDC Funding 161;l All P:vergladu..._;v Tourism Promotion Discussion The Need for Funding Year -Round Destination Marketing & Promotion Jack Wert, Tourism Director Naples Marco Island Everglades Mpin Ikbrwrd.d Purpose Discuss the need for year -round destination marketing of Collier County The current Collier Tourist Tax Structure How we compare to other destinations Discuss possible reallocation of TDT uses to support year -round destination marketing 10/11/2010 I 16 11 A 114,2010 Naples 1Larcolsland Situation Analysis • Year -round tourism marketing and promotion is essential to attract new and repeat visitors to our area • Visitors, in turn, spend in Collier businesses and contribute to all tourist development tax uses • Competing destinations have larger budgets and market year -round • In FY 10, tourism invested an additional $1 million transferred from Beach Renourishment Reserves • TDC explored several alternatives in July to support continued year - round destination marketing and recommended them to BCC • BCC Approved $1 Million from Beach Park Facilities for FY 11 • BCC requested input on possible reallocations of tourist tax uses to support year -round destination marketing from community stakeholder groups and advisory committees Naples Alaraol>bnd livergladex.�= How Tourism Benefits Our Community • Visitor Spending — $760 Million — 1.4 Million Visitors • $1.1 Billion Econ. Impact • 31,000 Tourism Jobs — Every 44 Visitors support one tourism industry job • Employee Wages -$898 M. • Tax Revenue- $79.7 Mill. Sales & Gas Taxes • Tax Savings — $609 Per Collier Hsld. • Beach & Inlet Projects Funding • Museum Funding • Supports Year -round employment Levels out seasonality Sources: Research Data Services, Inc; Smith Travel Research; HU Analytics, Collier Tax Collector 2 1 6 1 1 A 11011112010 Nnples A1arco Island Crrrgladrs,. ti' Tourism Status Report Thru August • Total visitation up 4% over 2009 Additional 34,600 visitors to destination Additional $17.7 million in direct expenditures Lodging Occupancy up 3% Tourist tax revenue increased $592,234 Web Site visitation up 16% ROI of $20.65 for each dollar invested in destination marketing and promotion- up from $17.60 in FY 09 Sources: Research Data Services, Inc, Smith Travel Research; H 3 Analytics, Collier Tax Collector Naples Atarso Island Current Tourist Tax Allocations • First 2 %: — 50% to Category A (Beach Renourishment & Beach Park Facilities) — 23.236% to Category B- (Tourism Admin.- Emergency Ad Reserves) — 22% to Category C -1 (County Museums Operations) — 4.764% to Category C -2 (Non- County Museum Grants) 3rd % 100% to Category A (Beach Renourishment /Beach Pk Facilities) 4th % 100% to Category B (Marketing & Promotion) 3 161 t0771/2010 Naples .1Lvmisl.,nd Current Funding Per TDT Category ® Based on a $12 Million Budget (each r = $3 million) — Cat. A- Beach & Beach Park Facilities $6,000,000 — Cat. B — Marketing, Administration, Emergency Advertising Reserves $4,400,000 • Advertising $2.0 M, Contracts $1.0 M • Admin. $900 K, Emergency Reserves $500 K — Cat. C -1- Museum Operations $1,300,000 — Cat. C -2- Non- County Museum Grants $ 300,000 Naples AIaq�LlanA Lve�laAes_.�y= Tourist Tax Revenue Distribution 2010- $12 Million CVB 37 %__. �'— BEACH .RENOURISH 50% MUSEUMS 13% NBEACH RENOURISHMENT ■MUSEUMS OGVB 4 161 1 All so/11/2010 Naples Muaolsland Ihergladcx. Marketing Budget Comparisons $3 Million (Reallocation Approved for FY 11 -1 year) x =$2M Budget x = $31`1 Budget z1110 zott q0 q1 q2 q3 In -State Campaign' Miami /Ft Lauderdale West Patin Beach Orlando TampNSI t etersburp SouB cst Florida "Local' XX X XX XX XX X X X Northam Campaign New VOM l,h¢ego (hiletlelphla XX � X Madceting Enhancement Public RelaOOns X X X X X X Web Enhanoemenrs X X _X X ,. Wsitor CeIXer Coordinator Research Etc X XR X X X 1611 All \aples Nbac.ldaad Marketing Budget Comparisons $4 Million (Current FY 10 Year Plan) x = $2M Budget zgm zott x =$3M Budget q4 qt O2 03 x. =$4M Budget In -State Campaign Miami I aw adule X XXX X West Palm Beaoh odaede X XXX xxx X x rx Tampa)Sl Petersburg XXX X X Southwest Florida "Local" Northern Campaign New York XXX Chicago Philatlelphia XX X Markogng Enhancements PnbIIC Ralallens XX XX XX XX Web Enhancements xX XX XX XX Visitor Center Coordinator XX XX xX xX Research Etc XX Xx xX XX io /ii /2010 0 1 b J 1 All ,11,2010 Naples Nbmohland rvrrglaaes.�^ - Tourist Tax Comparisons Orlando 6% • Tampa 5% • Bradenton /Manatee 5% • Charlotte 5% • St. Pete /Clearwater 5% • Ft. Lauderdale 5% Ft. Myers /Sanibel 5% Miami 5% Palm Beach 5% Florida Keys 4% • Sarasota 4% • Naples, Marco, Ev. 4% pp,,�� Naples starcoUlnml Total Tourist Tax Collections • Ft. Lauderdale $40 M • Miami $30 M • Palm Beach $28 M • St. Pete /Clearwater $24 M • Ft. Myers /Sanibel $23 M • Florida Keys $16 M • Naples /Marco /Ev. $12.5 M • Sarasota $10 M • Bradenton $5 M • Charlotte $3 M 161 ,1 IM,k. waavl,Wd Marketing Budget Per Lodging Unit • Florida Keys $800 • Ft. Lauderdale $450 • St. Pete /Clearwater $425 • Charlotte $425 • Ft. Myers /Sanibel $400 Bradenton $350 Palm Beach $300 Miami $300 Sarasota $250 Naples /Marco /Ev. $232 V�p�es Alarcolsland Advertising & Promotion Budgets • St. Pete /Clearw. $14 M (60 %) • Ft. Lauderdale $15 M (50 %) • Miami $14 M (50 %) • Palm Beach $14 M (49 %) • Ft. Myers $14 M (60 %) • Florida Keys $12 M (75 %) • Sarasota $3.3 M (32.5 %) • Naples /Marco /Ev. $2 M (16 %) • Bradenton $2 M (46 %) • Charlotte $1.5 M (40 %) A11 10/11/2010 D Naples /Marco /Ev $6 M (50 %) Sarasota $4.4 M (40 %) Ft. Myers $7.2 M (20 %) St. Pete /Clear. $2.3 M (9 %) 161 1 4p�ea star�uti,�a Lreglaxlcs,.^�^�- • Palm Beach $1.5 M (5 %) • Bradenton $1.2 M (24 %) • Ft. Lauderdale $1 M (5 %) • Miami $ 0 Naples Afanvlelana fvcrylaJo = County Museum Funding • Collier is only County in our Competitive Set of destinations that allocates tourist tax to Museum Operations • Some Florida Counties use tourist tax grants to promote Museum events and festivals A11 10/1.1/2010 9 16 I 1 A11,'A 10/11_/2010 ' Naplcs ALurolslavd Can We Agree? Naples, Marco Island, Everglades needs to promote to visitors year -round Our area needs more marketing funding to compete in the tourism marketplace We need to evaluate all current TDT uses and consider re- allocations for more marketing & promotion funding Naplrs \fu"0'1avd everylndes��;r� - -- What Options Are Available? • Category A — Reduce percentage or allocations to Beach Renourishment — Reduce percentage or allocations to Beach Park Facilities and replace with General Fund or Parking Revenues • Category B — Very little can be done to free up more funds for marketing • Category C— 1 — Reduce Operating Funds Allocation over 3 years and replace with General Funds and /or Admission Fees • Category C — 2 — Reduce Grant funding and replace with co-op advertising 10 1611 A11� nape« .�L,«olsiMa c.«biad�s -� Additional Options Work with Tax Collector to register and collect tourist tax from all short term rentals Collect actual TDT due on Internet hotel sales Continue allocating all interest revenue on TDT funds to Category B- Promotion Napins Marco lslznJ Evavyludes.�.� Next Steps Discussion and recommendations Recommendations to BCC on November 1 Public Hearings in early 2011 if Tourism Ordinance or Policy change is recommended Re- allocated funding in place by mid 2011 10/11/2010 11 I 61 1 A 1 7,11/2010 12 16 1 1 All Promotional Issues 1611 All RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - 201 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, REPLACING AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -25, THE COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FACILITIES AND OUTDOOR AREAS LICENSE AND FEE POLICY IN ORDER TO INCREASE BOAT LAUNCH FEES FROM $5 TO $8 AT ALL COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS AND MARINAS. WHEREAS, on February 9, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopted Resolution 2010 -25, superseding prior resolutions in order to revise the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Facilities and Outdoor Areas License and Fee Policy in order to increase Beach Parking fee at Conner Park; and WHEREAS, in order for boat launch fees to cover operating expenses staff and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommends that Boat Launch Facilities Fees be increased to $8.00; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners hereby accepts the recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY THAT: The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Facilities and Outdoor Areas License and Fee Policy is hereby established as follows. This Policy supersedes and replaced the Policy as established in Resolution No. 2010 -25. I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to ensure maximum use of facilities, outdoor areas and programs in Collier County and provide equitable fees and charges collected from users of such facilities, outdoor areas or programs. II. LIMITATIONS The Parks and Recreation Director, or designee, may waive enforcement or application of any of these regulations or restrictions with respect to any facility, outdoor areas, or program provided such waiver does not interfere with public safety or enjoyment. No fees may be waived. No non - government entity shall charge an admission fee to any out of doors event, including aquatic facilities. The Board of County Commissioners shall set fees and charges for all facilities and programs. 161 1A11 Consistent with Collier County's policy of ensuring all citizens equal opportunity to participate in programs, any resident requesting special consideration must substantiate to the Parks and Recreation Director proof of financial need. All information provided is not confidential but will be used only for the purpose of establishing reduced or waived program fees. Rates and charges can be modified on a case -by -case basis if approved by the Director of Parks and Recreation for special promotional sales and advertisements to stimulate increased utilization of programs. III. CLASSIFICATIONS A. Facility License Definitions and Uses 1. Outdoor Areas: Open space or land owned or leased by the Parks and Recreation Department. Such outdoor areas shall include, but not limited to, sports fields, playgrounds, swimming pools and /or other park and recreation land areas, excluding Golden Gate Community Center. (As to Golden Gate Community Center, refer to Section Q, herein). Outdoor areas shall be used for those purposes designated or implicit in their character. Any deviation from normal appropriate use shall require express prior permission from the Parks and Recreation Director or designee. 2. Facilities: Buildings and dwellings owned or leased by the Parks and Recreation Department. Such facilities include, but are not restricted to, community center areas and rooms, gymnasiums, pavilions, shelters, and other areas located in the Parks and Recreation structures, excluding the Golden Gate Community Center. (As to Golden Gate Community Center, refer to Section Q, herein). Facilities shall be used for those purposes designated or implicit in their character. Any deviation from these intended normal uses shall require express prior permission from the Parks and Recreation Director, or designee. 3. Programs: Recreation activities conducted on land or in facilities owned or leased by Collier County. Such activities include, but are not restricted to: athletic, clinic, instructional and interpretative seminars for preschool, youth, adult, senior and special populations. Any deviation from these intended normal uses shall require express permission from the Parks and Recreation Director, or designee. 4. Vehicle Parking Fees: Parking lots at Collier County beach parks and accesses, to include, but not limited to, the following: Tigertail Beach, Barefoot Beach Access, Barefoot Beach Preserve, Clam Pass Park, Conner Park, Vanderbilt Beach, North Gulf Shore Access, and South Marco Beach Access. 2 • °wozw z r (9 W F.. z T� O LL _) y C i = E QX L � C 7 Q + L� 0 F 0 t)� d r■ � L 0 n cc n a 1 ff.A 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 CO lD tl N O sanoH OIgeIienV;O % 161 All o W a r } c o Co Co LL U U C M Q � N a M LL M C n � W � o U r LL . } — m LL M a m a ° m CD c o > To LL I N N CT E @ m W E O } x N .? } LL M 6 ei F (D � M C } OO LL 0 — U M >� N E m Ci � cn E a O CD N O � M � m IA C N O a) U N O LL S U N m a � J w W ° a } I Q I C LL LL M II C U O U M a U } m N v LL M 0 U w �QU O LL N LL M U 0 Q O M C CD } > Z N LL Q W M Z in V C� } � Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U. ' Advisory Committee 2885 Horseshoe Drive South � Naples Fl, 34104 t' February 1, 2011 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes: January 18, 2011 V. Landscape Architect Report —Windham Studio A. Devonshire Refurbishment VI. Old Business VII. New Business VIII. Committee Member Comments IX. Public Comments X. Adjournment Hiller �-- �liller Henning Coyle Coletta The next meeting is February 15, 20113:30 p.m. Growth Management Division — Construction & Maintenance 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 Misc. Cares: Date: b I Itern It 10 — N%, or Radio Road Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee j 2,885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 January 18, 2011 Minutes 16!1Al2 I. The meeting was called to order by Dale Lewis at 3:30 PM. II. ATTENDANCE Members: Dale Lewis, Betty Schudel, Helen Carella, John Weber County: Darryl Richard - Project Manager, Gloria Herrera - Budget Analyst, Others: Scott Windham - Windham Studio, Darlene Lafferty-Juri staff III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Add. VIL C. Radio Road Streetscape Beautification Signs Betty Schudel moved to approve the agenda as amended Second by John Weber. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 16, 2010 Helen Carella moved to approve the November 16, 2010 minutes as presented Second by John Weber. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. V. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. Budget Report- Gloria Herrera reviewed the following information: (See attached) • Collected Ad Valorem Tax $245,867.34 • Available Capital Outlay $444,813.80 B. Project Manager Report- Darryl Richard announced positive feedback has been received from Naples Residents on the completed Projects: (See attached) VI. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT A. Hannula -Mike Anderson - None B. Windham Studio - Scott Windham reported the following Maintenance items: o Weeds are present in the Devonshire Median and noted: - Hand pulling of the weeds is required - Additional application of Fertilizer is needed 16 11 Al2 • White Bougainvillea (Phase III) and newer Pink Bougainvillea have defoliated due to the cold weather • Ongoing issue (Phase II -B) chloriodic Foxtail Palms on Tina Lane Darryl Richard stated Staff will be present during Fertilization of the Foxtail Palms on Tina Lane. o Royal Palm Trees require observation as the foliage is dry due to the cold weather (Phase II areas and toward Devonshire) Staff stated the Ant mound problem will be reviewed with the Contractor. • Freeze burn is present on the Montgomery Palms • Damaged Pavers on the Median tip (east end of the Shopping Center ) • Contactor needs to be more proactive on Maintenance items Gloria Herrera reported 2 Police vehicles were parked in the median on Radio Road. Dale Lewis requested Windham Studio provide a recommendation at the February meeting on sparely planted areas that were installed during previous Project Phases (by Kmart, Seven Eleven and Windjammer.) Scott Windham recommended postponing Plant installations until Spring 2011. He stated an evaluation of the area on the quantities and Plant spacing will be provided to the Committee. VII. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT REPORT- Windham Studio Scott Windham reviewed the following: A. Phase III Project - Project is complete B. Devonshire Refurbishment (See attached) Berkshire Lakes Hedge and Street Tree Replacement • 100% Construction Plans are under review by Staff • Opinion of Probable Cost was reviewed (See attached) • Revised Plans reflects installation of ground cover (Asian Jasmine) between the Clusia Hedge and sidewalk in lieu of sod - Sod will remain between the sidewalk and the street Median Landscape and Irrigation Refurbishment o Irrigation Plans were reviewed Staff noted the Devonshire Refurbishment Project Drawings will be posted on the County website. 161 1Al2 Discussion took place on the projected completion date for the Devonshire Refurbishment Project. After discussion the following was concluded: 0 120 days is required to complete the Project o Refurbishment Project total cost estimate - $172,382.05 Scott Windham suggested soliciting Bids based on the Alternate Plant Materials as it would be a considerable savings to install a (1) ft. smaller shrub: Dwarf Clusia Plant Material (quantity274) estimates 0 15 gallon - total cost $27,400.00 0 10 gallon -total cost $16,166.00 Dale Lewis moved go out to Bid with the Alternate (Plant Materials). Second by John Weber. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. Darryl Richard recommended adding Sod restoration to the bid as he perceives vehicle damage will occur during the Refurbishment. Betty Schudel suggested replacing the Sod areas with Asian Jasmine (from the sidewalk to the street.) Discussion ensued and the benefits of installing Asian Jasmine were noted: • Reduce Installation cost - Plant materials cost less than sod • Reduce Maintenance cost - Mowing is not required • Decreased Water Bill - Irrigation is not required • Aesthetically unique Dale Lewis moved to remove the sod and install Plantings, right to the sidewalk. Second by Betty Schudel. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. Staff reviewed the Project timeline based on the Committee's request to install Asian Jasmine in lieu of sod: o Windham Studio will modify the Plans to include - Sod removal - Installation ofAsian.Jasmine o Subsequently the Project will go out to Bid - Anticipate Bid results will be available within 30 days after Bid Solicitation o Apply for a ROW Permit 1611Al2 Dale Lewis suggested transitioning directly to Devonshire Medians upon completion of the Devonshire Refurbishment. He perceived it would save monies on the Median Project as Equipment would already be mobilized. Scott Windham proposed Windham Studio move forward to Design Phase for the Devonshire Median Project. Dale Lewis moved for Windham Studio to Design the Devonshire Medians. Second by Betty Schudel. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. Discussion ensued on Bid Solicitation for the Devonshire Refurbishment and Devonshire Medians. Staff stated the (2) Devonshire Projects will be Bid independently, however it was recommended to retain (1) Contractor for both Projects. Betty Schudel suggested the Committee hold a Special meeting to review the preliminary Design for the Devonshire Medians. After discussion it was agreed by the Committee, Staff, and Consultant to hold a Special meeting at 3:30 p.m. on February 1, 2011 to review Concepts for Devonshire Medians. Dale Lewis moved to hold a Special meeting February 1, 2011 at 3:30 p.m. Second by Helen Carella. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. C. Radio Road Streetscape Beautification Signs Darryl Richard reported the ROW Department denied the ROW Application to install the additional (2) Signs. He stated Staff will meet with the ROW Department and the Sign Contractor to review the Land Development Code. Dale Lewis expressed the following: • MSTU dollars were allocated for Signs that the cannot be installed — Conversely Permits were issued for (2) existing Radio Road Streetscape Beautification Signs • Suggested inviting County Commissioners to the Radio Road MSTU meeting to advocate the Committees position on inconsistent approvals by the County (ROW) for Signage Dale Lewis moved to extend an invitation to Commissioner Henning and Commissioner Coyle to attend the Radio Road MSTU meeting to discuss Signage, ROW, and the Medians, as the MSTU Committee is uncertain of what can or cannot be done with Signage. Second by John Weber. Motion carried unanimously 4 -0. 161 1 Al VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. Devonshire Water Usage Darryl Richard reported: • Water Usage Evaluation is being conducted • A meeting will be held with Roger Dick, Staff, Scott Windham, and James Abney to determine the MSTU monthly payment for Water Usage IX. NEW BUSINESS - None X. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS -None XI. PUBLIC COMMENT - None There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 4:48 P.M. Radio Road Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee Dale Lewis, Chairman These minutes approved by the Committee on I as presented or amended X Special meeting is scheduled februarw 1, 2111113:31) p.m. Growth Management Division — Construction & Maintenance 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 5 16 r ,A Z444 IZAA04 M.SJ.U. Ao"" Cow S. HavwdR 1D t `��II�l ,FL 34104 f t l• ail BY: .................. QStober 6, 2010 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to order IL Attendance III. Approval of Agenda 13FH �- Henning Coyle Colem IV. Approval of Minutes - August 11, 2010 and August 16, 2010 Regular meeting V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report - Gloria Herrera, Budget Analyst B. Project Manager - Darryl Richard, Project Manager VI. Landscape Architect Consultant Report - Dayna Fendrick, Urban Green Studio VII. New Business A. Florida Sunshine Law and Ethics Workshop - October 14`h B. Transcriptionist Requirements VIII. Old Business A. Liaison Report - RR MSTU - Sue Chapin IX. Future Meeting Date X. Public Comments X1. Adjournment The next meeting is scheduled for November 3, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 Misc. Corres: Date: 1 Item #: 16 I 8440 IZ44a E" H.S.T.u. Akz," Cov� 2885 S. N«ud« N Nom, fl 34104 � ecember i, aoio t ';i i'; IZZZIVOIJJfI AGENDA BY: ..................... - 1. Call Meeting to order IL Attendance III. Approval of Agenda X11 Fiall �-�-�- 1 a Hiller Henning Coyle Coletto V IV. Approval of Minutes - October 6, 2010 Meeting V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report — Gloria Herrera, Budget Analyst B. Project Manager — Darryl Richard, Project Manager V1. Landscape Architect Consultant Report — Dayna Fendrick, Urban Green Studio VII. New Business VIII. Old Business A. Liaison Report— RR MSTU — Sue Chapin IX. Public Comments X. Adjournment The next meeting is scheduled for January 5, 1011 at 10:00 a.m. 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Misc. Conesi Naples, FL 34104 Item #:__ tR"44 EA4 Ms-T.1. A44" 2885 S. H—gda iJ Nxt&4' fl 34104 February 2, 2011 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to order it. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda 1611A13 IV. Approval of Minutes - December 1, 2010 Meeting V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report — Gloria Herrera, Budget Analyst B. Project Manager — Darryl Richard, Project Manager VI. Landscape Architect Consultant Report A. Landscape Design— Dayna Fendrick, Urban Green Studio B. Irrigation Water Source — .lames Abney, .lames C. Abney & Assoc. VII. New Business VIII. Old Business A. Liaison Report — RR MSTU — Sue Chapin IX. Public Comments X. Adjournment The next meeting is scheduled for March 2, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 Re ir 16414113 i Wza R"01 EAE-a M.S.T.U. Ak.," Cam: 2886 5. He+ -w,8« 2 Ngbt , FL A104 Minutes October 6, 2010 L Call Meeting to Order The Meeting was called to order by Chairman Dale Johnson at 10:00 AM. 11. Attendance Members: Sue Chapin, Thomas Depouw, Renato Fernandez, Dale Johnson, Paige Simpson County: Michelle Edwards Arnold — ATM Director, Pamela Lulich — Landscape Operation Manager, Darryl Richard — Project Manager, Gloria Herrera - Management Budget Analyst Others: Dayna Fendrick — Urban Green Studio, Katie Binkowski — Urban Green Studio Staff introduced Sue Flynn, a transcriptionist employed by Juristaff, stating she has been working with the County for several years and will transcribe future Radio Road East MSTU Advisory Committee's meetings. 111. Approval of Agenda Renato Fernandez moved to approve the Agenda as submitted. Second by Sue Chapin. Motion carried 4 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes — August 11, 2010 and August 16, 2010 August 11, 2010 H. Attendance (County) — should read Michelle Edwards Arnold Sue Chapin moved to approved August 11, 2010 Minutes as amended. Second by Renato Fernandez. Motion carried 4 -0. Sue Chapin moved to approved August 16, 2010 Minutes as submitted. Second by Renato Fernandez. Motion carried 4 -0. V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report 16 1,1 A13 Gloria Herrera distributed and reviewed the Radio Road East MSTU Fund 166 Report. (See attached) Paige Simpson arrived at 10. 10 AM Gloria Herrera stated October 1" was the new Fiscal Year 2011 and further explained the Budget Line Items. • Current Ad Valorem "fax (Estimated) $153,300 • Operating Expense Available $ 56,000 • Total Budget (Estimated) $145,600 Staff answered many questions from the Advisory Committee. It was noted the funds in Reserve for Future Construction Account could be made available when doing a Budget Amendment. Unused Reserve Account funds are transferred into the Carried Forward Account at the end of the fiscal year. B. Project Manager Darryl Richard asked the Advisory Committee to review the Radio Road East MSTU Membership List for accuracy and provide revisions to the transcriptionist. A revised list will be provided to the Advisory Committee at the December meeting. Staff distributed the Irrigation Consulting Services Proposal by .Tames C. Abney & Associates and a Proposal for Landscape Architectural Services Scope of Work and Fees by Urban Green Studios. (See attached) VL Discussion with Landscape Architect Consultant — Urban Green Studio (UGS) Dayna Fendrick reviewed the Proposal for Landscape Architectural Services tasks as follows: • Overview and Assumptions fhe Sub - Consultants will include James C. Abney & Associates for irrigation design; Allied Engineering and A &L Labs for soil borings and analysis. A surveyor will be required for a section of the roadway that is not covered in the Wilson Miller Engineering plans. • Scope of Services will include a review of existing roadway engineering plans, a site visit to identify existing features of surrounding landscape character. UGS will prepare a sightline study to determine how FDO'f criteria will apply to specific project intersections and research options for an irrigation source. She stated if a well is selected as the water source, UGS will prepare a consumptive water use permit application to South Florida Water Management District. 2 161 1 A13 Allied Engineering will conduct soil borings and collect soil samples from the medians at approximate 100 -foot intervals. Collier County Transportation Engineering & Construction Management Department Plan Profiles provided by WilsonMiller were distributed. (See attached) Staff requested a fertilization adjustment recommendation for pH level. Conceptual Design (30 %) 3- Conceptual Planting and Irrigation alternatives will be provided. Alternates will illustrate a range of options, a comparative conceptual opinion of construction costs for each option. After the Advisory Committees approves the design, Urban Green will prepare a color rendered Conceptual Master Plan with support graphics and images for a Radio Road East MSTU public meeting. Design Development (60 %) Develop and refine planting design throughout project. Define irrigation method and schematic zone layout. A public meeting will be held for Community support prior to Final Design phase. Final Design and Construction Documents (90 & 100 %) Based on Client review and the approval of the 60% drawings; incorporate comments and then proceed with final construction documents. Meetings UGS personnel will attend monthly MSTU Committee meetings. Prepare for and attend public meetings to present the Conceptual Master Plans and the Design Development Plans to the MSTU Communities. Mr. Abney will attend 3 meetings early in the design process. Pam Lulich suggested working with the Water Symposium. They design by using drought tolerant plants. The Water Symposium design could be of use as one of the Conceptual Design alternatives, if so desired by the Committee. Staff recommended working with the Water Symposium after the 30% phase. The Water Symposium is looking for a median site project. The project design would be funded with a Grant. The MSTU would be responsible for planting and maintenance. Pam Lulich stated Santa Barbara Field Reports completed by John Rawl, a year ago, would show the rock and soil layer conditions in the Radio Road East MSTU medians. 3 16[1A13 i She suggested having Allied Lab bore 2 holes per 100 -foot which would save the MSTU costs. It was noted the Radio Road East MSTU is currently on a list for an Enhancement Grant. Staff reminded the Advisory Committee; the MSTU pays costs prior to receipt of Grant Funds. The Scope of Services does not include the additional survey costs. Staff stated a well would be used for a water source. Permit costs are included in the proposal for well and permitting could take 2 /2 - 3 months. • Bidding Assistance and Services During Construction UGS and Mr. Abney will provide bidding assistance. No pre -bid conference is anticipated. • FDOT Coordination If the Enhancement Grant funding is awarded, additional design review submittals and documentation during construction will be required. • Reimbursable Expenses • Fees (See Exhibit A — Fee Schedule attached) Sue Chapin asked UGS to provide documentation with estimated projection dates for different tasks per the Scope of Services. Discussion was made concerning the Fee Schedule and what to include in a recommendation for a Work Order. Staff recommended using one Purchase Order to cover entire project over 5 -years and when necessary, rollover and increase or decrease dollar amount. Staff will work out budget internally. Tom DePouw moved to approve the Scope of Services and Fee Schedule as presented and to include survey work not to exceed $59,834. Second by Renato Fernandez. Motion carried 5 -0. VII. New Business A. Florida Sunshine Law and Ethics Workshop — October 14 Staff recommended the Advisory Committee attend the Florida Sunshine Law and Ethics Workshop on October 14 at 9:00 AM. The Workshop is mandatory for all Committee Members who have not attended previously. B. Transcriptionist Requirements Discussion was made and transcriptionist tasks will be handled by Sue Flynn. ➢ Email and call to remind Advisory Committee prior to all meetings 4 1614 ,A15 ➢ Provide 5- copies of minutes for previous meeting and 5- copies of the current meeting's agenda. ➢ Mail copies of minutes and handouts to those Committee Members unable to attend a meeting. ➢ Mail copies of minutes, summary and handouts to BCC ➢ Provide Staff with scanned copy of signed meetings ➢ Coordinate contents of future agendas with Dale Johnson VIII. Old Business A. Liaison Report — RR MSTU Sue Chapin stated she will be attending Radio Road Beautification MSTU meetings every 2 or 3 months or when she feels necessary. It was noted Radio Road Beautification MSTU tried to expand boundaries to include the now Radio Road East MSTU. IX. Future Meeting Date December 1, 2010 - 10:00 AM. It was noted Renato Fernandez will not be at the December meeting. X. Public Comments — None. There being no further business to come before the committee, the meeting was adjourned at 11:40 AM. Radio Road East Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee /V Dale Johnson, Ch ' man These minutes approved by the Advisory Committee on as presented ✓ or amended The next meeting is scheduled for December 1, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 5 161,1 A13 RazaR"01 &&9 M.S.T.U. Adv" 2885 S. Hai 941.1 1 Not-, Fl 34104 Summary of Minutes and Motions October 6. 2010 111. Approval of Agenda Renato Fernandez moved to approve the Agenda as submitted. Second by Sue Chapin. Motion carried 4 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes — August 11, 2010 and August 16, 2010 August 11, 2010 IT Attendance (County) — should read Michelle Edwards Arnold Sue Chapin moved to approved August 11, 2010 Minutes as amended. Second by Renato Fernandez. Motion carried 4 -0. Sue Chapin moved to approved August 16, 2010 Minutes as submitted. Second by Renato Fernandez. Motion carried 4 -0. VI. Discussion with Landscape Architect Consultant — Urban Green Studio (UGS) Discussion was made concerning the Fee Schedule and what to include in a recommendation for a Work Order Tom DePouw moved to approve the Scope of Services and Fee Schedule as presented and to include survey work not to exceed $59,834. Second by RenatoFernandez. Motion carried 5 -0. 16j1 O O F- W Vj J XX UW 2O Z W m �. U) W ~ 2 J O ~¢rWJxaCU' 0 � NOw nU) z Q C �zwJF¢� z zQz ? aU�� w z z O x O O Q Q> x C J 0 M 0< Z) U) co z LL O�p0F �X��:3:W F- MWcWZF ¢¢�O J JpzF - U) tr��Un O�w'm0 W x �Un xOf w '�. > >x2CO W wwOwOwww w m� aF Wo �w F- F- w>>; . ppF -F-W z CO U) c V) �W Nd'O¢ >¢ (n (O W W fn d'2' ¢ Q x w w w z z w w� z , w N W w w F Z Z U` U` Z W W- W � >FW-W wwQQ ww z.V ltd aQ ww Op p7w ww U 0 w??X F -F-00Z F- W -1000?0 F-F mm F- M W:,_. r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N 00 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00000 0000000 O o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 M M r-- O V) .-- V O (O (O C- M- M M- m CO f- r f` A (o O O M M (o (o (o LO V) V (o N N (O (o d O Q Z ?- r #; -- %h= » Va (» Vt Vi Vi (» Va (n Va vi e� Vi Vi V) Vi en Vi (» Vi 64 Va Va Vi Vi (n i V 4' 7 7 (O N C W y W G CD Vi V) V) Vi CO V) Vi V) V) (A V) V) V) V) V) V) VW V) w Vi V) Vi Vi to VJ 09, O LL V c d E E E U r (» V) V) Vf V) V) Vf (» Vi V) Vi V) (» (» V) v Vi V) (A V) V) V) Vi V) V) V) -• 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o O O O 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 V CD 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 606 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 co .a y % Cl) Cl) A O Lo .- V O (O LO O cc N (M M cm N 'O N r r V r r LO N N M M (o LO LO (([ E 4 Vi Vi V) V) Vi V) Vi Vi Vi V) V) Vi to V! Vl V) V) V) V) V3 V) V) V) (fl V) F- W Vj J XX UW 2O Z W m �. U) W ~ 2 J O ~¢rWJxaCU' 0 � NOw nU) z Q C �zwJF¢� z zQz ? aU�� w z z O x O O Q Q> x C J 0 M 0< Z) U) co z LL O�p0F �X��:3:W F- MWcWZF ¢¢�O J JpzF - U) tr��Un O�w'm0 W x �Un xOf w '�. > >x2CO W wwOwOwww w m� aF Wo �w F- F- w>>; . ppF -F-W z CO U) c V) �W Nd'O¢ >¢ (n (O W W fn d'2' ¢ Q x w w w z z w w� z , w N W w w F Z Z U` U` Z W W- W � >FW-W wwQQ ww z.V ltd aQ ww Op p7w ww U 0 w??X F -F-00Z F- W -1000?0 F-F mm F- M W:,_. r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N <& �\ §\ ci \\} § aw} \ \\\ I6| ' A 1 3 \)0 ;;y§ § © §® k\ \ \ a a a | ( } (\ \ \ ( } \ ( o \ | } ( } \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 § § - � ' § ) E - \ k I6| ' A 1 3 \)0 ;;y§ 161 1 A13 I lames C. Abney & Associates Irrigation Consulting, Site Observation, System Auditing & Management 2984 40 Street SW - Naples, Florida 34116 Telephone: (239) 304 — 8451; Fax (239) 304 — 8452 E -Mail JAAIDC2 @aol.com Irrigation Consulting Services Proposal Date: October 4, 2010 To: URBAN GREEN STUDIO, Inc. — Attention Ms. Dayna L. Fendrick, ASLA, Landscape Architect/Principal /Project Manager. Re: Irrigation System Design & Construction Observation Services - Proposed scope of work and fees. Project: Radio Road Phase IV (Medians & ROW areas between Santa Barbara Blvd & Davis Blvd). Pursuant to our past conversations regarding the project mentioned above, I am sending the proposed scope of work and proposed fees for review, and acceptance. The proposed scope of work is for the Radio Road sections located from Santa Barbara Boulevard to Davis Boulevard, 1.3 +/- miles. RADIO ROAD Phase IV - IRRIGATION CONSULTING & CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK & FEES RADIO ROAD PHASE IV (East), IRRIGATION DESIGN PRELIMINARY DESIGN RESEARCH - $1,200.00 Fee (1) Preliminary Work — Onsite review of existing conditions that will influence the design such as: Site layout; Location of potential electric service and water sources; Research electric service availability; Evaluate water source and control system options Review Proposed site & landscape design; Provide preliminary calculations to determine the flow demand required to hydrate the project. 161!1 A13 (2) System Water Source Options — Based on the initial research done previously for potential irrigation water source, determine the type of water source to be used. Provide a preliminary Opinion of Probable Installation Costs, and an Opinion of Probable Annual Water Consumption. (3) Consumptive Water Use Permit Application — Prepare a Consumptive Water Use Permit Application; Perform calculations necessary to determine potential water consumption; Research data necessary to fill out permit forms; Assist in filling out permit forms. RADIO ROAD PHASE IV (East), IRRIGATION DESIGN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS - $3,000.00 Fee (4) System Elements Selection & Sizing — Initiate design layout and sizing of system elements such as: main line and lateral line piping; main line piping specialty valves; hydration methods and media. (5) Construction Details and Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. Provide element construction details that indicate installation methods & media to be used, an opinion of probable construction costs and operating schedule(s). The work is estimated to be produced on: (1) Master /Key sheet; (6) double view port design sheets at 20' scale; (2) construction details and legend sheets; (1) general notes and recommended operating schedule /system management sheet. RADIO ROAD PHASE IV (East), IRRIGATION CONSULTING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION - $2,500.00 Fee The Services During Construction work is estimated to be produced in the following form: PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE (6) Pre - Construction assistance with bid documents preparation, bids review and Contractor selection. (7) Assist during initial meeting(s) with contractor to answer questions and discuss procedure and expectations. Provide minor design adjustments or graphic presentation adjustments if needed. Preconstruction Phase Services Fee: $500.00 2 1611 A13 CONSTRUCTION PHASE (8) Provide eleven visits to observe installation of water sources, controllers, main line and lateral piping network, main line specialty valves and other items, zone control valves and hydrants (provide eight visit reports with pictures). Construction Phase Services Fee $1,500.00 CONSTRUCTION CLOSING PHASE (9) Provide Substantial Completion Walkthrough to review operation of the system and generate a corrective action punch list for the contractor to perform prior to turn over to Owner. Provide a Final Acceptance Walkthrough & Report to confirm corrective action punch list conformance. Provide Electronic As -Built Record Files. Construction Closing Services Fee $500.00 RADIO ROAD PHASE IV (East) - PROPOSED FEES TOTAL The proposed fees Total Amount is $6,700.00 (Six Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars). The proposed scope of work and fees are for the Radio Road section located between Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard. I thank you for inviting me to assist URBAN GREEN STUDIO, Inc. with the project, if you have any questions regarding the proposed scope of work and fees feel free to contact me. Regards, JAMES C. ABNEY & ASSOCIATES. Irrigation Consulting, Auditing and Management J P n&es C. A vueU, IA, CIT Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor 018448 State of Texas Licensed Irrigator 0005636 Telephone: (239) 304 -8451 Fax: (239) 304 -8452 Cellular: (239) 821 -3405 FOR: 1611A13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROPOSAL Radio Road East MSTU SUBMITTED TO: Ms. Pamela Lulich, RLA, Manager of Landscape Operations Mr. Darryl T. Richard, RLA, Landscape Project Manager Collier County Transportation Services Division Alternative Transportation Modes Department PREPARED BY: DATE: SUBJECT: Ms. Dayna L. Fendrick, RLA, AICP Urban Green Studio, PLLC October 5, 2010 Proposal for Landscape Architectural Services 1.0 OVERVIEW & ASSUMPTIONS 1.1 The project is approximately 1.3 miles in length, and extends from Santa Barbara Boulevard east to Davis Boulevard. The subject medians range in width from 35' to 45'. Curbing and irrigation sleeving is in place. 1.2 The project is to be funded by the Radio Road East MSTU, which was created for the purpose of landscape and irrigation installation and maintenance. The Radio Road East MSTU Committee (Client) will be responsible for design review and decisions, with input from the Alternative Transportation Modes Department staff (ATM). ATM staff will provide design review and written comments at each major milestone (30- 60 -90 %). 1.3 The project has been submitted for a Transportation Enhancement Grant, which may be approved at a future date. If approved, Grant management will be performed by ATM staff, with support documentation & billing reviews during construction by Urban Green Studio (UGS). 1.4 This contract will be administered under Collier County Contract # 08 -5060 "Fixed Term Landscape Architectural Services ". Radio Road East MSTU Proposal Collier County Transportation Services October 5, 2010 1611 A13 1.4 The project team will include James Abney & Associates as a sub - consultant for irrigation design, and Allied Engineering and A &L Labs for soil borings and analysis. UGS will be the prime consultant, and will manage and coordinate the sub - consultants. 1.5 UGS will gather roadway base information from WilsonMiller, Inc. in MicroStation format and will convert the files to AutoCad 2008. ATM staff will provide the base information for the section of roadway that is not covered in the WilsonMiller files, from Robin Hood Circle to Davis Boulevard, in AutoCAD 2008 or compatible format. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS Attend a kick -off meeting with the Client, ATM and project team to develop project goals and objectives, obtain design direction and discuss the design process and budget. LANDSCAPE Review existing roadway engineering plans obtained from WilsonMiller, to ascertain important elements such as utility locations, light poles, roadway signs, sleeving, swales, etc. Manipulate the MicroStation files to set up usable AutoCAD base maps. Conduct a site visit to identify existing features, such as adjacent land uses, community entries and buffers, and existing landscape character. Prepare a sightline study to determine how FDOT criteria will apply to specific project intersections. Review current FDOT landscape guidelines and determine how they will apply to the project. Gather photo examples of various median plantings that might be comparable, inspirational or applicable to the Radio Road medians. IRRIGATION Research options for the irrigation source. Provide a cost and feasibility analysis of the following options: • Extend the effluent line from Countryside on Santa Barbara Blvd • Extend the effluent line from Radio Road West • Utilize a well and pump system. 1611 A13 Radio Road East MSTU Proposal Collier County Transportation Services October 5, 2010 Prepare a memo summarizing the analysis and recommendations. Meet with County staff to review equipment preferences and operational issues. Research and identify power source locations for the potential pump station and controller. Assuming the well is selected as the source, we will prepare a consumptive water use permit application to South Florida Water Management District. The water use demand calculations required for the application will be based on the worst case scenario. SOIL Allied Engineering will conduct soil borings and collect soil samples from the medians, at approximate 100 -foot intervals, from two sides of the medians. UGS will provide a diagram for the approximate soil boring locations. Allied Engineering will test the soil borings /samples for permeability, pH, organic content, soil composition, and presence of rock or compacted limerock. Once the soil borings have been analyzed, send up to three (3) typical soil types found to A &L Labs for further analysis and recommendations for amendments or replacement soil characteristics. 2.2 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (30 %) Explore alternative landscape treatments that will fulfill the established goals and objectives and meet Collier County's Master Plan requirements (i.e. no irrigated Floratam sod). Prepare up to three (3) conceptual planting and irrigation alternatives that will illustrate a range of options, along with a comparative conceptual opinion of construction costs for the alternatives. Plans will be drawn in freehand form, and will show typical plan segments with cross - sections and elevations. Prepare a preliminary plant palette, with a plant image board. Review with Client, ATM and project team to discuss pros and cons of the alternatives, obtain review comments and select a preferred approach. Based on the soil borings & analysis, determine the extent of rock removal and prepare a rock removal diagram. Provide recommendations for replacement topsoil and amendments. Cl Radio Road East MSTU Proposal 161 1 q 13 Collier County Transportation Services October 5, 2010 Based on Client review and approval of a conceptual alternative, refine the plan to incorporate review comments, and prepare a color rendered Conceptual Master Plan, with support graphics and images for a public meeting. Prepare a Master Plan Report that summarizes the design criteria established, the design alternatives, cost analysis and a narrative description of the selected alternative. 2.3 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (60 %) Develop and refine planting design and plant selections, giving consideration to microclimate conditions, maintenance requirements, and the Client's input. Define irrigation method and extent, including source location, mainline routing, and schematic zone layout. Prepare rock removal and soil replacement plans. Follow up on water use permit application. Prepare an opinion of probable construction cost based on 60% plans. Submit plans to Client and ATM for review and comment. Plan deliverables will include two (2) full size sets and two (2) 11x17 sets of 60% Documents. 2.4 FINAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (90 & 100 %) Based on Client review and approval of the 60% drawings, incorporate comments and proceed with final construction documents. Final documents will include the following: Landscape plans, which will indicate location, size and species of trees, palms, shrubs and ground covers and any hardscape elements. Plans will also indicate sightline triangles, clear zones and other information required for FDOT review. Plans will include planting details, technical specifications and bid quantities. Irrigation plans, which will begin at the determined source, and will include sprinkler head locations, interconnect piping, control valves and controllers. Plans will include irrigation details, technical specifications and bid quantities. Rock removal and soil replacement plans, specifications and bid quantities. 4 Radio Road East MSTU Proposal 161 �� A i 3 Collier County Transportation Services J October 5, 2010 An opinion of probable construction cost based on final plans. Follow up on water use permit application. Submit plans at 90% complete to Client and ATM for review and comment. Based on comments, make final adjustments and submit 100% plans. Plan deliverables will include two (2) 24x36 sets and two (2) 11x17 sets, and a CD with AutoCAD drawing files and pdf files of the Final Construction Drawings. 2.5 MEETINGS Attend monthly MSTU Committee meetings throughout the design process. Twelve (12) meetings are allowed for in the proposed fee table. The fee schedule reflects attendance by two (2) UGS personnel, Ms. Fendrick and Ms. Binkowski, at the regularly scheduled meetings. Mr. Abney will attend three (3) meetings early in the design process. Prepare for and attend one public meeting to present the Conceptual Master Plans (30 %) to the MSTU communities. The meeting will be conducted in an "open house" format, not as a formal presentation. Provide graphic exhibits for the meeting, including plans superimposed over an aerial, boards with typical sections and elevations and a plant image board. Make notes and summarize comments received at the meeting. Prepare for and attend a second public meeting to present the Design Development Plans (60 %) to the MSTU Communities. Provide a similar set of graphics and a set of the design plans. Make notes and summarize comments received at the meeting. Collier County will be responsible for advertising and making arrangements for the location of the public meetings. 2.6 BIDDING ASSISTANCE & SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION UGS and Mr. Abney will provide the same services outlined below during bidding and construction, except as where noted. Provide bidding assistance, including responding to bidders' questions, and issuing addenda as needed. No pre -bid conference is anticipated. Radio Road East MSTU Proposal Collier County Transportation Services October 5, 2010 161 1 A13 r Provide design clarification, respond to RFI's from the Contractor, and review shop drawings. Attend one pre - construction meeting. Review pay requests, completed quantities and process change orders. Perform periodic site visits to observe the contractor's progress and general compliance with the plans and specifications. The construction time frame is assumed to be 150 days to substantial completion and 180 days (26 weeks) to final acceptance. UGS staff will attend weekly field meetings during construction and prepare field progress reports. Mr. Abney will attend field meetings and prepare field reports every other week during construction. Perform one preliminary walk- through at substantial completion and prepare a punch list outlining corrective actions needed. Perform one final walk- through to verify corrections have been made, and prepare a final project report. Provide Record Drawings based on field information provided by the Contractor. UGS will provide one CD with electronic files (AutoCAD drawings) and one set of PDF's. 2.7 FDOT COORDINATION In the case that the Enhancement Grant funding is awarded, additional design review submittals and documentation during construction will be required. The following services will be provided if the project is awarded the Grant funding: Submit plans to FDOT for design review and comment at 60, 90 and 100% complete. Revise plans to address comments received and resubmit for FDOT approval at each step. During the construction phase, provide the level of documentation, billing review and verification of quantities that is required for that process. 3.0 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Expenses for blue prints, reprographic services, color reprographics, overnight express delivery, and local courier delivery shall be reimbursable to UGS. There are no bid sets included; it is assumed that Collier County will be responsible for the printing of plan sets for bidding. 4.0 FEES Please see attached Exhibit A for the proposed Fee Schedule. A If _ A A 7 e I I 1 w I N I .I I ,vim. I I I I I'R I; I i I I {1 k . Fr 1611', A13 4 I I I �'I v ti ' I I C � I f I P � t I 1 ham`` jai it x �S� i I l I 6` � 3R �lI S a TI III I I I. 1 I I, I �i �I II ., t I I i 9 f • m, �x `I II�r t I.I i ( ?f� 1 ij y I; I i I I {1 k . Fr 1611', A13 4 I I I �'I v ti ' I I C � I f I P � t I 1 ham`` jai it x �S� i I l I 6` � 3R �lI S a TI III I I I. 1 I I, I �i �I II ., t I. 1 I I, I �i �I II ., t 161F1 A13 (y i o „r ,1. 1 n I f-A i ti 1. r t d I i • ry �1 ' CT n I S C 2't • I' I 'I yy N I � y u / i i; -. I ' (y i o „r ,1. 1 n I f-A i ti 1. r t d I i • ry �1 ' CT n I S C 2't • I' I 'I yy N I � y u / i i; -. (y i o „r ,1. 1 n I f-A i ti 1. r t d I i • ry �1 ' CT n I i C 1 C I N I � u / i -. o „r ,1. 1 n I f-A i ti 1. r t d I i • ry �1 ' CT n 161 1 A13 1 • • • i N ° �� -.I� �'•,�' �dvJl1 tw.T— (.._ i I I XI r L � l I 11 kit I- �;ll I 1 I tRBr N 11 1 IT :._ e � ..... .. I �� `* a la z N I I A rr —7 � I I i L 11 a J�`'a I " I � � OI I'•' i =� II �_1 _I I..l.t� 1 I II I S 11 I I I I - - A I 0 I 7 I I i I ri, Rf i t I 1 1 1 1 t I I I i r 1.1 I �_L.,17 I IN- `.IT_ 0 s g•, \ 4 I 11 IIII -.. 11 _m I I� I ; � S• a � P�_ �I � 1 1, I I 1 I� i 912C+a � I aTi I 1_ I I 1 + I • • • 40 \I ! I ry \ ! I II 1 it y. II Ir II p uN" St '41 1 II Ir 4l BSI R W F ql N 1611A13 �,I � II ^ i Y p II I i i 1 I ILA j\ O � Zjx III 1 I I I r I 1'I J h . � I 1611A13 �,I � I i m III 1 I 1'I J h it r i i I I I N --11 y T cc I I I C I, I 1 8 RiN 1611A13 e ` r. I1 ± ply !Vl - -f � —ivxn � svn I 1 I 1'I J h r i i I I GII --11 K`qI R T cc I I I C I, I 8 RiN B�3f r 1 1 - WMidl 1 W I � it 99 I 11 .1 I e ` r. I1 ± ply !Vl a13 • • 161 1 Al u it q� m i I R i i `• I' O i � I 4 ZI 1 i _o N 50 ro a. 1611 'o m E m 3 0 0 m N 9 N L N N OQ� E � `o s� E n w9 Y 6 d T U U N r i 0 v U O 0 E A13 0 N O Lv R. c3 Fr y 3 It t ....................... 16111 A13 R"*4 E*&9 M.S.T.U. Akw-" C ztu 2885 S. H«w,l« N V' Nqt"' Fl 34104 Minutes December 1.2010 I. Call Meeting to Order The Meeting was called to order by Chairman Dale Johnson at 10:00 AM. 11. Attendance Members: Sue Chapin, Thomas Depouw, Dale Johnson, Paige Simpson, Renato Fernandez (Excused) County: Michelle Edwards Arnold — ATM Director, Darryl Richard — Project Manager, Gloria Herrera - Management Budget Analyst Others: Dayna Fendrick — Urban Green Studio, Katie Binkowski — Urban Green Studio, James Abney — James C. Abney & Associates, Sue Flynn - Juristaff III. Approval of Agenda Sue Chapin moved to accept the Agenda for December 1st as submitted. Second by Tom Depouw. Motion carried 3 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes — October 6, 2010 Meeting Sue Chapin moved to approved October 6, 2010 Minutes as submitted. Second by Tom Depouw. Motion carried 3 -0. V. Transportation Services Report A. Budget Report Gloria Herrera distributed and reviewed the Radio Road East MSTU Fund 166 Report dated December 1, 2010. (See attached) She reported as follows: • Ad Valorem Tax Received $15,081.29 • Purchase Orders - Commitments $46,52937 • Operating Expense Available $ 8,994.00 • Total Actual Expenditures $ 929.07 Paige Simpson arrived at 10:10 AM B. Project Manager 161 1. A 13 Darryl Richard distributed and reviewed the Urban Green Studio's Fee Schedule. (See attached) He stated the Advisory Committee approved Urban Green Studios' Scope of Services and Fee Schedule not to exceed $59,834. The base Work Order does not include Task /Description line items: • 2.6 — Bidding Assistance & Construction Services $10,348. • 2.7 -- FDOT Coordination $ 5,540. VI. Discussion with Landscape Architect Consultant — Urban Green Studio (UGS) Dayna Fendrick reported driving through the Radio Road East MSTU neighborhoods with Katie Binkowski to view existing landscape for complimentary designs. Discussion was made on landscaping medians with simplicity, planting without sod, drought tolerant plants, maintenance costs, water usage and size of medians while retaining the Collier County appearance. Staff noted the overall County maintenance and water usage costs have been dramatically lower with eliminating sod. The Advisory Committee had requested Urban Green Studio provide 3- Landscape Design alternatives with pictures and to include the following comparisons: ➢ Frequency of maintenance for both sod to mulch ➢ Costs per design and to maintain, water usage, frequency of maintenance and utilizing sod versus mulch James Abney — James C. Abney & Associates distributed and reviewed the Irrigation System Potential Water Source Evaluation Study Memorandum. (See attached) He reviewed irrigation water options as follows: ➢ Option 1 — Effluent Water - Water service is only available at Phase I & Phase II sections. Connection to the existing 3" irrigation main is not recommended. Phase I is operating at peak capacity and not large enough to accommodate additional irrigation zones. Connection option is located at Davis Boulevard. Y Option 2 Potable Water — The use of potable water as an irrigation source is not recommended due to high costs associated with it due to the high amount of water usage. S Option 3 — Well Draw Water —This is a strong option as underground water is readily available in that part of the County. It was noted this option would require a permit from SFWM and have some water restrictions along with a $14,000 annual fee. James Abney stated the least costly water source would be to drill a well. Well irrigation must adhere to some watering restrictions. He will provide recommendations to the Advisory Committee at the next meeting. 2 1611A13. Discussion was made on well water stains, timing of irrigation system, pop -up versus drip systems and placement of water heads. It was decided that water stains can be controlled. Mr. Abney stated he will provide a maintenance schedule to lessen water staining and Urban Green Studios will do an evaluation of the pop -up versus the drip irrigation systems. The Well Draw Water Source options are as follows: S 6" Well with 7.5 HP VFD pump station - $29,000. Y 8" Well with 15 HP VFD pump station - $31,000. Dayna Fendrick distributed and reviewed the Radio Road East MSTU Project Schedule dated November 3, 2010. (See attached) It was discussed when to hold the public meetings and was suggested the initial meeting be held in March or April, 2011 and the second meeting being held in July or August. Discussion was held on the Advisory Committees' design expectations and concerns from Urban Green Studios. The Committee decided the following was important: • Lower water conservation • Simplified look • Safety — site lines VIL New Business Tom Depouw moved to hold the next Radio Road East MSTU Advisory Committee meeting on February 2 "d. Second by Sue Chapin. Motion carried 4 -0. VIII. Old Business A. Liaison Report — RR MSTU Sue Chapin reported attending the Radio Road Beautification MSTU meeting held on November 16`h. She stated the MSTU had to move palm trees due to the proximity of FPL power lines. Staff reported FPL is concerned over the high level of service in the area. FPL has been revisiting prior projects, checking palm trees and power lines and placing markers where movement is required. It was noted the MSTU would be responsible for paying any costs related to moving power lines if trees have been planted to close. Dayna Fendrick stated the Radio Road East MSTU had a few power lines in place that ran from North to South and will take that into consideration. The Committee requested the Design Concept include FPL lines. 3 1611 A13 Sue Chapin reported RR MSTU has informational signs placed in the medians. The informational signs indicate "Funding by MSTU" and not Collier County. Staff stated signs are temporarily displayed for only a couple of years. Staff distributed DVD's on the "Sunshine Law Workshop" held on October 14, 2010 to the Advisory Committee. IX. Public Comments — None. There being no further business to come before the committee, the meeting was adjourned at 11:25 AM. Radio Road East Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee Dale Johnson, Chai nan These minutes approved y the Advisory Committee on as presented or amended The next meeting is scheduled for February 2, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 S 16 1 1 A13 I zaza R"Of &Ga M.S.T.U. A C"-o x 2885 S. N -vatid� N� N.tk fl 34104 Summary of Minutes and Motions December 1, 2010 III. Approval of Agenda Sue Chapin moved to accept the Agenda for December 1st as submitted. Second by Tom Depouw. Motion carried 3 -0. IV. Approval of Minutes — October 6, 2010 Meeting Sue Chapin moved to approved October 6, 2010 Minutes as submitted. Second by Tom Depouw. Motion carried 3 -0. VII. New Business It was suggested the Committee hold the next meeting in February. Tom Depouw moved to hold the next Radio Road East MSTU Advisory Committee meeting on February 2 "`r. Second by Sue Chapin. Motion carried 4 -0. 16 I 1 N N N N N N N N N�" "> W V M 0 A W N i 0 W W V W N A W N+ O W W V M M A W N 0 w D o m D D m o m 0 0 0? G) D O D D G m <MMC mmz00zz A m XACommWW DODOcn Xm m#"to -<-<Ww Zm��oo mm m�--i m1 rm =N'CO �_y �, - :.mcnoomm m�M=G< �T �A� mOOcm G) cna0' :tp --IXX cn -i ZpD> m Ztocn c Cl) vcn r� m n<�� 0 zmm cn c env Z O Za Z3 _.A Z OO�D �OmZy�D� C) O O z mI O N o z x-u m m m m X X cn m r A cn m z pD -ism 0 r cn cn C r m fA EA fA EA EA w fA EA fA EA w EA fA fA fA 69 in w EA EA EA EA EA EA [A EA Co 3 Ut W a � m rn rn w w 0 Ern rn v � v V V w w f� C. W W w w O (T (n O A � Gl O ., v v W W ID co 0 0 0 0 0 cc O O O 00 O O "" N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 o o o o o. c o o 0 0 0 0 ' ' 60 coo bb o o 00 o 0 0 00 00 O O o O o O O fA EA Efl EA fA EA fA df EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA fA lA w EA EA EA BOO G7C:i'7 C: M r MIND (A E01E01EAJ W691vi CP cn 'IA A 1. 1 'I4 O W O i O J O fA fA EA EA EA �...:'.:, EA fA fA EA EA EA EA fA EA fA EA A O � N i 0 00 W W OD to vi EA EA fA EA EA fA EA fA fA fA fA EA fA EA EA W A -+ W 1:-4 v W W W o cn 0 (O ? (p O v v O A A 0 0 0 (O O O O O (O O O O J -I 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 .A O O O Qn (IT 0 0 0' O o o o 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 v W ' W N (O X 3 m H 1 O E; i� C d A134 F-4, SI v a 1D T O C z CL �a � � N 01 .� N 01 3 CA O � C m O O W W W 0 0) W W W v W ' W N (O X 3 m H 1 O E; i� C d A134 F-4, SI v a 1D T O C z CL �a � � N 01 .� N 01 3 CA O � C Radio Road East 1611 A134 PO's FY 11 Vender Name Item PO# Remaining Paid Juristaff Clerical Services 4500122526 $ 2,523.37 $ 476.63 Staples Office Supplies 4500123131 $ 100.00 $ - Urban Green Eng Fees Re $ 43,906.00 $ $ 46,529.37 $ 476.63 01I I, }. "= �`t 'k1iD1�Vti6 $346,324,543 FY 11 Taxable Value @ 7/1/10 #DIV /01 Adi.1010ll FY 11 FY 10 Millage Cap =.5000 Millage 0.4400 0.0000 Extension 153,263 0 J Imes C. Abney & 161 1 ;ociates Irrigation Consulting, Site Observation, System Auditing & Management 2984 44th Street SW - Naples, Florida 34116 Phone(239)304 — 8451; Fax (239) 304 —8452 E -Mail JAAIDC2 @aol.com Irrigation System Potential Water Source Evaluation Study Memorandum DATE: December 1, 2010 A13 TO: Ms. Dayna L. Fendrick, Landscape Architect /Planner & Project Manager — Urban Green Studio, Inc. FROM: James C. Abney, JCA &A. PROJECT: Radio Road R.O.W. Phase IV, Naples Florida SUBJECT: Irrigation Water Source Options /Electrical Source Options. The project is a continuation of streetscape improvements for the Radio Road Right of Way. The subject section, which lies between the Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard is going to be referred to as Phase IV. The acreage is estimated to be slightly greater than 2 +/- acres because the length of the section is approximately 1.3 +/- miles, and the width of most medians is greater than twenty -five feet. Most of the medians are long. The irrigation water source will have to be capable of providing a minimum flow of 100 + /- GPM in order to meet the Phase I & II Irrigation Restrictions; and or 160 + /- GPM in order to meet the Phase III restrictions. The absolute minimum water meter size recommended for the project is a 2" water meter. One water source that is capable of providing a flow of 120 + /- GPM is necessary to meet the Phase I Irrigation Restrictions; for the Phase III & Phase IV restrictions the water source will need to be able to provide at least 160 + /- GPM, or use two of the lower flow (120 + /- GPM water sources. IRRIGATION WATER SOURCE OPTIONS EFFLUENT WATER: Effluent water service is available only at the Phase I & Phase II sections. The primary effluent water source is a 3" effluent water meter and booster pump station that are located by station 179 +00, in front of the water plant that is East of the Livingston Road Intersection; about 8,200' + /- from the Radio Road & Santa Barbara intersection. Connecting to that system is not recommended because the system (Phase I) is operating at peak capacity, and the existing 3" irrigation main that services that system i5' 1611A13 is not large enough to accommodate additional irrigation zones. If a second effluent water meter were to be considered as an irrigation source for the Phase IV section, a new 8" service line would be required to provide water to the Phase IV section. The water would have to be stored in a large concrete storage /mixing chamber that will need to be located at the midpoint of the Phase IV project, and have a pumping system to draw water from the concrete storage /mixing chamber. The 8" effluent service line would have to go through existing landscape and paved surfaces. The estimated cost of it is likely to be around $447,500.00 + / -. In the paragraphs below are two tables that summarize the estimated approximate cost provided. EFFLUENT WATER OPTION #1 ESTIMATED SERVICE EXTENSION COST PARAMETERS • Distance From Water Plant to Phase IV Mid Point: 11,000' + /- • Estimated Effluent Water Source Option 1 Total Cost: $447,000.00 + /- Estimated Description Estimated Unit Cost Estimated Unit Total Cost 8,500 + /- L.F. 8" Class 200 PVC $20.00 + /- L.F. $170,000.00+/ - Effluent Water Service Line 2,5000 + /- L.F. 8" SDR 11 HDPE $45.00 + /- L.F. $112,000.00+/ - Effluent Water Service Line 20 +/- 8" PVC to HDPE $750.00 + /- Ea. $15,000.00+/ - Mechanical Joint Connectors 1 +/- Concrete Effluent $60,000.00 + /- $60,000.00+/ - Water Storage Chamber w/ Pumping System 60,000 + /- L.F. Existing Landscape $1.50 + /- S.F. $90,000.00+/ - Restoration A second effluent water source, a medium size concrete storage /mixing chamber, is located at station 217 +00, just east of Glen Eagle's development north entry. The existing effluent water concrete storage /mixing chamber is a dedicated effluent water source for the last medians of Radio Road (before the Santa Barbara ROW crossing) and the Devonshire Boulevard ROW system. The DB effluent water source is not suitable for use because it is also operating at its peak capacity, it cannot accept additional zones. A recent research review of the existing effluent service line from the mixing chamber (north of the Glen Eagle development's north entry) indicated that severely high friction losses (in excess of 60 +/- PSI) if a connection to that existing service line were to be done to extend the effluent water service into the Phase IV project. ■ 161 1 A13 A third effluent water service point of connection option is located at Davis Boulevard, about 5000' + 1- from the Santa Barbara Blvd. & Radio Road intersection. In order to provide the minimally required flow demand for the Radio Road Phase IV project an 8" PVC service line will be necessary in order to keep friction losses to a minimum, and reduce potential pressure surges within the safe management capacity of a 2" pressure reducing valve. EFFLUENT WATER OPTION #3 ESTIMATED SERVICE EXTENSION COST PARAMETERS • Distance From Davis Boulevard location to Phase W Mid Point: 7,200' + /- • Estimated Effluent Water Source Option 3 Total Cost: $221,500.00 + /- Estimated Description Estimated Unit Cost Estimated Unit Total Cost 6,000 + /- L.F. 8" Class 200 PVC $20.00 + /- L.F. $120,000.00+/ - Effluent Water Service Line 1,200 + /- L.F. 8" SDR 11 HDPE $45.00 + /- L.F. $54,000.00+/ - Effluent Water Service Line 10 +/- 8" PVC to HDPE $750.00 + /- Ea. $7,500.00+/ - Mechanical Joint Connectors 7.5 VFD Centrifugal $40,000.00 + /- $40,000.00+/ - booster pump with incorporated filtration. Include three phase electric service Based on the review done effluent water service is not feasible for the project's Phase IV section due to the distance from the primary point of connection that is suitable and available, as well as due to the construction cost that would be associated with extending effluent main lines from different points of connection into the Phase IV project. POTABLE WATER OPTION Potable Water: The use of potable water as an irrigation source is not recommended due to very high costs associated with it. The potable water source costs associated at the use of potable water include: c 1611A13 Potable Water Source Initial Costs • Water Meter Size Required: 2" Water Meter • Potable Water Source Initial Cost (One -Time only Expense): $27,509.30 D. +..hlo Wa +nr Qnirrra Initial Cnett Rreakdown Est. Qty. Description Unit Cost 1 2" Potable Water Meter Impact Fee $20,735.00 1 2" Potable Water Meter ERC 5.8 Value Fee $3,761.30 1 2" Potable Water Meter Installation Fee $1,213.00 1 2" Reduced Pressure Backflow Preventer & Installation Cost $1,800.00+/ - D.. +ohln Wa+or Cnnrrn Rarnrrina Cnsts — Mnnthly Costs Frequency I Description Unit Cost Monthly 2" Potable Water Meter Monthly Service Fee $113.42 Monthly Monthly Water Consumption Approximate Cost (based on $1,052.14 + /- Option 2 2010 C. C. rates for 2" potable water meter, with a monthly $31,000.00 consumption of 235,178 + /- gallons of water). D..Mhlo Wo +nr Qnnrra Rarnrrino Cnetc _ Annual Total Frequency Description Total Cost Annual Annual 2" Potable Water Meter Monthly Service Fee Total $1,361.04 Annual Annual Potable Water Consumption Monthly Estimated Cost Total Total WELL DRAW WATER OPTIONS Well Draw Water: The better irrigation water source option appears to be a well draw system. This irrigation water source option presents the opportunity to choose from two source size /capacity options which will present a long term cost difference that is minimal. Wall draw Water Snnrce Ontions # Description Estimated Cost -Option Option 1 6" well with a 7.5 HP VFD pump station capable of $29,000.00+/- providing flows up to 120 + /- GPM at 55 +1- PSI Option 2 8" well with 15 HP VFD pump station capable of $31,000.00 providing flows up to 180 + /- GPM at 60 +/- PSI a �� 16111 A13 The initial purchase and installation cost difference between both units is around $2,000.00 + / -. The larger unit will present long term savings that can offset the initial installation cost (investment) within five years in the form of shorter operating time (electrical service cost). Also, the larger irrigation source will be able to meet with greater ease the irrigation restrictions for Phase III & IV (shorter water windows). A well draw system is also a strong option because under ground water is readily available in that part of the county. ELECTRIC SERVICE Electric service poles are available along the South side of the ROW, but there are not many poles with transformers. Two poles with a #50 transformer have been located near the middle part of the project. Three phase electric service is very likely to be available at either of the two poles selected. The side of the ROW slopes adjacent to the poles, coupled with the overhead lines present a condition that suggests for the well, pump station and controller(s) to be located within the corresponding median. Also, by having the water source and controller(s) within the median(s) will reduce the amount of bores that are required for control wires and lead main line piping. Potential electric service pole #1 location: STA 292 +75 (South side of ROW); Pole Identification number: 7- 6982- 0940 -3317. 161 1 A13 Potential electric service pole #2 location: STA 299 +50 (South side of ROW); Pole Identification number: 7- 6982 -2342. Left Picture, Typical side of the ROW slope gradient. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely yours JAMES C. ABNEY & ASSOCIATES J a wt.es c. A b wed James C. Abney, I. A., C.I.T. State of Texas Licensed Irrigator 005636 litigation Association Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor 018448 161 A13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROPOSAL FOR: Radio Road East MSTU SUBMITTED TO: Ms. Pamela Lulich, RLA, Manager of Landscape Operations Mr. Darryl T. Richard, RLA, Landscape Project Manager Collier County Transportation Services Division Alternative Transportation Modes Department DATE: SUBJECT: Ms. Dayna L. Fendrick, RLA, AICP Urban Green Studio, PLLC October 15, 2010 Proposal for Landscape Architectural Services 1.0 OVERVIEW & ASSUMPTIONS 1.1 The project is approximately 1.3 miles in length, and extends from Santa Barbara Boulevard east to Davis Boulevard. The subject medians range in width from 35' to 45'. Curbing and irrigation sleeving is in place. 1.2 The project is to be funded by the Radio Road East MSTU, which was created for the purpose of landscape and irrigation installation and maintenance. The Radio Road East MSTU Committee (Client) will be responsible for design review and decisions, with input from the Alternative Transportation Modes Department staff (ATM). ATM staff will provide design review and written comments at each major milestone (30- 60 -40 %). 1.3 The project has been submitted for a Transportation Enhancement Grant, which may be approved at a future date. If approved, Grant management will be performed by ATM staff, with support documentation & billing reviews during construction by Urban Green Studio (UGS). 1.4 This contract will be administered under Collier County Contract # 08 -5060 "Fixed Term Landscape Architectural Services ". 1611 A13 1.4 The project team will include James Abney & Associates as a sub - consultant for irrigation design, and Allied Engineering for soil borings and analysis. UGS will be the prime consultant, and will manage and coordinate the sub - consultants. 1.5 UGS will gather roadway base information from WilsonMiller, Inc. in MicroStation format and will convert the files to AutoCad 2008. For the portion of the roadway that is not covered in the WilsonMiller files, from Robin Hood Circle to Davis Boulevard, UGS will obtain roadway engineering plans from ABB Engineering, dated 2002, in AutoCAD format. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS LANDSCAPE Attend a kick -off meeting with the Client, ATM and project team to develop project goals and objectives, obtain design direction and discuss the design process and budget. Review existing roadway engineering plans obtained from WilsonMiller and ABB, to ascertain important elements such as utility locations, light poles, roadway signs, sleeving, swales, etc. Manipulate the MicroStation flies to set up usable AutoCAD base maps. Conduct a site visit to identify existing features, such as adjacent land uses, community entries and buffers, and existing landscape character. Prepare a sightline study to determine how FDOT criteria will apply to specific project intersections. Review current FOOT landscape guidelines and determine how they will apply to the project. Gather photo examples of various median plantings that might be comparable, inspirational or applicable to the Radio Road medians. IRRIGATION Research options for the irrigation source. Provide a cost and feasibility analysis of the following options: • Extend the effluent line from Countryside on Santa Barbara Blvd • Extend the effluent line from Radio Road West • Utilize a well and pump system. 2 16 11A13 Prepare a memo summarizing the analysis and recommendations. Meet with County staff to review equipment preferences and operational issues. Research and identify power source locations for the potential pump station and controller. Assuming the well is selected as the irrigation source, we will prepare a consumptive water use permit application to South Florida Water Management District. The water use demand calculations required for the application will be based on the worst case scenario. SOIL INVESTIGATION Allied Engineering will perform approximately sixteen (16) five feet deep auger borings and collect soil samples from each boring (2 per median). Allied Engineering will perform a field permeability test at each boring location, as well as provide visual soils classification and laboratory testing for pH and organic content of the samples collected. They will provide a letter report to present the findings of the test results, discuss the subsurface profile encountered and provide a boring location plan. 2.2 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (30 %) Explore alternative landscape treatments that will fulfill the established goals and objectives and meet Collier County's Master Plan requirements (i.e. no irrigated Floratam sod). Prepare up to three (3) conceptual planting and irrigation alternatives that will illustrate a range of options, along with a comparative conceptual opinion of construction costs for the alternatives. Plans will be drawn in freehand form, and will show typical plan segments with cross - sections and elevations. Prepare a preliminary plant palette, with a plant image board. Review with Client, ATM and project team to discuss pros and cons of the alternatives, obtain review comments and select a preferred approach. Coordinate and meet with the Water Symposium group to define their goals and determine to what extent their criteria can be incorporated into the project design. Based on the soil borings & analysis, determine the extent of rock removal and prepare a rock removal diagram. Provide recommendations for replacement topsoil and amendments. 1611 A13 Based on Client review and approval of a conceptual alternative, refine the plan to incorporate review comments, and prepare a color rendered Conceptual Master Plan, with support graphics and images for a public meeting. Prepare a Master Plan Report that summarizes the design criteria established, the design alternatives, cost analysis and a narrative description of the selected alternative. 2.3 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (60 %) Develop and refine planting design and plant selections, giving consideration to microclimate conditions, maintenance requirements, and the Client's input. Define irrigation method and extent, including source locatio i, mainline routing, and schematic zone layout. Prepare rock removal and soil replacement plans. Follow up on water use permit application. Prepare an opinion of probable construction cost based on 60% plans. Submit plans to Client and ATM for review and comment. Plan deliverables will include two (2) full size sets and two (2) 11x17 sets of 60% Documents. 2.4 FINAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (90& 100 %) Based on Client review and approval of the 60% drawings, incorporate comments and proceed with final construction documents. Final documents will include the following: Landscape plans, which will indicate location, size and species of trees, palms, shrubs and ground covers and any hardscape elements. Plans will also indicate sightiine triangles, clear zones and other information required for FDOT review. Plans will include planting details, technical specifications and bid quantities. Irrigation plans, which will begin at the determined source, and will include sprinkler head locations, interconnect piping, control valves and controllers. Plans will include irrigation details, technical specifications and bid quantities. Rock removal and soil replacement plans, specifications and bid quantities. n 1611 An opinion of probable construction cost based on final plans. Follow up on water use permit application. Submit plans at 90% complete to Client and ATM for review and comment. Based on comments, make final adjustments and submit 100% plans. A13 Plan deliverables will include two (2) 24x36 sets and two (2) 1.1x17 sets, and a CD with AutoCAD drawing files and pdf files of the Final Construction Drawings. 2.5 MEETINGS Attend monthly MSTU Committee meetings throughout the design process. Twelve (12) meetings are allowed for in the proposed fee table. The fee schedule reflects attendance by two (2) UGS personnel, Ms. Fendrick and Ms. Binkowski, at the regularly scheduled meetings. Mr. Abney will attend three (3) meetings early in the design process. Prepare for and attend one public meeting to present the Conceptual Master Plans (30 %) to the MSTU communities. The meeting will be conducted in an "open house" format, not as a formal presentation. Provide graphic exhibits for the meeting, including plans superimposed over an aerial, boards with typical sections and elevations and a plant image board. Make notes and summarize comments received at the meeting. Prepare for and attend a second public meeting to present the Design Development Plans (60 %) to the MSTU Communities. Provide a similar set of graphics and a set of the design plans. Make notes and summarize comments received at the meeting. Collier County will be responsible for advertising and making arrangements for the location of the public meetings. 2.6 BIDDING ASSISTANCE & SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION UGS and Mr. Abney will provide the same services outlined below during bidding and construction, except as where noted. Provide bidding assistance, including responding to bidders' questions, and issuing addenda as needed. No pre -bid conference is anticipated. 5 161 1 A13 Provide design clarification, respond to RFI's from the Contractor, and review shop drawings. Attend one pre - construction meeting. Review pay requests, completed quantities and process change orders. Perform periodic site visits to observe the contractor's progress and general compliance with the plans and specifications. The construction time frame is assumed to be 150 days to substantial completion and 180 days (26 weeks) to final acceptance. UGS staff will attend weekly field meetings during construction and prepare field progress reports. Mr. Abney will attend field meetings and prepare field reports every other week during construction. Perform one preliminary walk - through at substantial completion and prepare a punch list outlining corrective actions needed. Perform one final walk- through to verify corrections have been made, and prepare a final project report. Provide Record Drawings based on field information provided by the Contractor. UGS will provide one CD with electronic files (AutoCAD drawings) and one set of PDF's. 2.7 FDOT COORDINATION In the case that the Enhancement Grant funding is awarded, additional design review submittals and documentation during construction will be required. The following services will be provided if the project is awarded the Grant funding: Submit plans to FDOT for design review and comment at 60, 90 and 100% complete. Revise plans to address comments received and resubmit for FDOT approval at each step. During the construction phase, provide the level of documentation, billing review and verification of quantities that is required for that process. 3.0 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Expenses for blue prints, reprographic services, color reprographics, overnight express delivery, and local courier delivery shall be reimbursable to UGS. There are no bid sets included; it is assumed that Collier County will be responsible for the printing of plan sets for bidding. 4.0 FEES Please see attached Exhibit A for the proposed Fee Schedule. Allied Engineering hmiftxCcatccM3adFngimedw, W%collxn:dion(lrcic Matuials Te.4ing, Constmdion Insliectknh, Foil Micas, Flmida 33915 & Testing, Inc. mdFn%imnFneWalSenices ( 239)331 - 6!333/(239)331.6613 FAX 1aylr Allicd nmingnm October 14, 2010 Ms. Dayna Fendrick, RLA, AICP Urban Green Studio PO box 111841 Naples, FL 34108 (239) 263 -4029 SUBJECT: Proposal for Geoiechnical Engineering Services Radio Road, Collier County, FL Allied Proposal No. 10 -2355 Dear Ms. Fendrick: 361 1 A13 Allied Engineering and Testing, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to provide geotechnical engineering and testing services for the above referenced project. This proposal presents our understanding of the scope of services, compensation, scheduling and authorization, as well as a fee schedule, proposal acceptance, and general conditions sheet. SCOPE OF SERVICES Allied will perform (16), 5 feet deep auger borings at 8 locations in the median of Radio Road. This represents two borings per area. One field permeability test will be performed in accordance with SFWMD standards per boring. Further, we will provide visual soils classification from samples obtained from these borings in accordance with the applicable ASTM and/or AASHTO soils standards. A letter report will be prepared upon completion of the field and laboratory services. The report will present the following information: • Discussion of the site visit completed by representatives from our office and any surficial features that may impact construction of the structures. • Discussion of the estimated subsurface profile as encountered in the sal borings completed for this study and previous studies, if available. • Boring location plan(s) • Field permeability test results. • Laboratory test results. M WWGEO Pmpopb%2010 PmpombNO -2366 Radio Road Poo tedsmvpd Page 1 161 1 A13 Radio Road Median Allied Proposal No. 10 -2355 Urban Green Studio October 14, 2010 COMPENSATION The actual compensation forAllied's services will be invoiced in accordance with the attached fee schedule (refer to Attachment 1). ESTIMATED FEES Based upon the project information provided, we recommend a budget of $6,460.00 for the scope of services previously described. This estimate does not include soil boring location, staking, or clearing for accessibility. If necessary, Allied will perform these services on a "cost plus' basis. Compensation will be based upon the actual costs incurred, based upon our standard fee schedule. AUTHORIZATION If this proposal meets with your approval, please acknowledge your acceptance by signing the attached Proposal Acceptance Sheet and return one copy for our files. This will make the proposal and general conditions the agreement between us and authorize Allied Engineering S Testing, Inc. to commence the subsurface exploration described. If you take exception with any portion of this proposal, please list them on the signature page. Sincerely, ALLIED EN4JfyEERING & TESTING, INC. , P.E. Vice President Attachments: Estimated Fees Proposal Acceptance Sheet General Conditions M.V"Eo Propo"Wa 10 Propaata110.2W Radio Road Pare teatempd Page 2 161 1A13 Radio Road Median Allied Proposal No. 10 -2355 Urban Green Studio October 14, 2010 ESTIMATED FEES FIELD OPERATIONS Unit PHa Quanillity C Mobilization/Demobilization of drill crew and equipment $300.00 1 Auger Borings, 18 ® 5 feet with field permeability test $300.00 18 Permit (cost + 10%, if required) N/A 0 Total for Field Operations $5.100.00 Laboratory Services Visual Soil Classification $3.00 $0.00 Gradation Testing (including 0200 wash) (if required) $85.00 $0.00 Atterberg Limits testing (if required) $85.00 $0.00 Organic Content Testing (1 per boring) $30.00 18 $480.00 pH test (1 per boring) $15.00 18 $240.00 Total for Laboratory Services $720.00 Report Senior Project Engineer $125.00 1 $125.00 Staff Engineer $70.00 4 $280.00 CADD Technician $55.00 3 $185.00 Technical Secretary $35.00 2 $70.00 Report Total 5640.00 PROJECT TOTAL SB 00 M:".GEO ft""M\2010 Ropwal&M -2355 Raft Road PMa togs wpd Page 3 16 I ]A 13 Radio Road Median Allied Proposal i1o. 10.2355 Urban Green Studio October 14 2010 PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE This proposal and the general conditions accepted on Accepted by (print name and Signature Firm Name C ity Phone Number Fax No. Special Instructions or Exceptions to Proposal (identify page number) Zip Code P.O. Number (if applicable) *By signing this thrm, you designate and authorize Al ied Engineering and Testing, Inc., to act on yourbehalf, or on the behalf of your corporation, as the agent in the processing of any permit application andbr authorization forthe propertylisted above and to furnish, on request, supplemental information in support of the application. "In order for us to better serve you, please attach boring locations and project location (1.e.: map with legible street names, strap number, address). REPORT DMWBUTION LAST Owner Architect Client Contractor M.V"Eo Pmpe W\2010 Propmsk\10d3W Raft Rom Pere laWampd Page 4 161 1 A13{ Radio Road Median Allied Proposal No. 10 -2355 Urban Green Studio October 14 2010 PAYMENT TERMS - Payment is due upon receipt of our invoice. STANDARD OF CARE - Allied Engineering & Testing, Inc. will use the degree of skill ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by reputable members of our profession practicing in the some or similar locality. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made in connection with this proposal or in the Issuance of our oral or written reports. SAMPLING OR TESTING LOCATION - The fees identified in this proposal do not include costs associated with the location of tests by surveying methods. The locations will be based on information provided by others and estimates made in the field by our field crews. RIGHT -OF ENTRY - The client will provide Allied Engineering & Testing right-of -entry onto the property to complete the borings, tests, and/or other explorations necessary and as authorized. Allied will take all reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the property as a result of our services. Our fee does not include restoration of the site to its original condition. An additional fee will be charged if the client desires that the site be restored to its former condition. DAMAGE TO EXISTING MAN -MADE OBJECTS - Allied Engineering & Testings' personnel are not responsible for any damage caused to man -made objects which have not been Identified by the client or his authorized representative. It is the responsibility of the client to make known the presence of all underground man -made objects and to clearly disclose the exact location of the man -made objects relative to the boring locations or other field tests. In the event that Allied Engineering & Testing is notified of the presence of underground obstructions, we will give special instructions to our field personnel. The client agrees to indemnify and save harmless Allied Engineering & Testing from all claims, suits, losses, personal injuries, death and property liability as a result of not making known the presence and exact location of any subsurface strictures or conditions, owned by the client orthird parties. The client also agrees to reimburse Allied Testing Laboratories for expenses in connection with any such claims or suits, including reasonable attorney's fees. SAMPLE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT - Samples obtained in drilling operations or other specimens will be disposed of 60 days after submittal of our report to the client. Samples subjected to testing will be disposed of immediately upon completion of the testing. If the client wishes that the samples be retained, the client shall request this in writing and Allied Engineering & Testing will retain the samples for a mutually agreed upon storage charge and period of time. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS - Documents generated during the service of the project described in the proposal shall bathe sole property of Allied Engineering & Testing. Thedocuments generated forthis project shall not be used for any other project or location without the written permission of Allied Engineering & Testing. Copies of documents generated for this project shall be made available to the client for a period not exceeding five years upon completion of the report. MAMi.WO kwomk=10 ftpoeaWN10 -MW wdb P,md PM bW5 V d Page 5 1611 A13 WORK ORDER # Agreement for: Landscape Architectural Services Fixed'Perm Dated: September 23, 2008 (RFP /BID # 08 -5060) This Work Order is for Professional Landscape Architectural Services, subject to the terns and conditions of the contract referenced above. for work known as: Project Name: Radio Road East MS fL — Landscape & Irrigation Design The work is specifi ed in the proposal dated October 5, 2010 which is attached hereto and made a part of this W ork Order. In accordance with Terms and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above. Work Order# /Purchase Order N _ is assigned to: Urban (ireen Studio Scope of Work: As detailed in the attached proposal and the following Task 2.1 Data Collection Registered Landscape Architect 16 hrs. @ $128 /hr. $ 2,048.00 Landscape Architect 0 hrs C$ 120 /hr. $ 0.00 Design Associate 16 hrs. Ca, $ 75 /hr $ 1,200.00 ACAD Tech 16 hrs. @$ 62 /hr. It 992.00 Administrative 2 hrs. k—v $ 55 /hr. $ 110.00 Sub 'Total It 4,350.00 Irrigation Sub $ 1,200.00 Eng. Base $ 560.00 Soils Sub $ 6,500.00 Sub Total $ 8,260.00 Total $12,610.00 Task 2.2 Conceptual Design 30% Registered Landscape Architect 32 hrs. @ $128 /hr. It 4,096.00 Landscape Architect 0 hrs (d, $120/fir. $ 0.00 Design Associate 52 hrs. @, $ 75 /hr It 3,900.00 ACAD Tech 0 hrs. (a.$ 62 /hr. $ 0.00 Administrative 0 hrs. (c, $ 55 /hr. $ 0.00 Total $ 7,996.00 Task 2.3 Design Development 60% Registered Landscape Architect 20 hrs. i $128 /hr. $ 2,560.00 Landscape Architect 0 hrs @ $ 120 /hr. $ 0.00 Design Associate 16 hrs. @ $ 75 /hr $ 1,200.00 ACAD Tech 16 hrs. (cr$ 62 /hr. It 992.00 Administrative 0 hrs. (a) $ 55 /hr. $ 0.00 Sub Total $4,752.00(TME) Irrigation Sub $ 1500.00(LS) Total $ 6,252.00 Task 2.4 Final Design & Const. Does 90- 100"/ Registered Landscape Architect Landscape Architect Design Associate ACAD Tech Administrative Sub 'Total Irrigation Sub Total Task 2.5 Meetings Registered Landscape Architect Landscape Architect Design Associate ACAD Tech Administrative Sub 'Total Irrigation Sub Total 20 hrs. C $128 /hr. 0 hrs C $ 120 1hr 26 hrs. C $ 75 /hr 26 hrs. n.$ 62 /hr. 4 hrs. a $ 55 /hr. 32hrs. r6 $128 /hr. 0 hrs C $ 120 /hr 32 hrs. C $ 75 /hr 0 hrs. C$ 62 /hr. 0 hrs. C $ 55 /hr. Task 2.6 Bidding Assistance & Const. Services Registered Landscape Architect Landscape Architect Design Associate ACAD Tech Administrative Sub Total Irrigation Sub Total Task 2.7 FDOT Coordination Registered Landscape Architect Landscape Architect Design Associate ACAD Tech Administrative Total 3.0 Reimbursable Expenses 16 hrs. C $128 /hr. 0 hrs C $ 120 /hr 56 hrs. C, $ 75 /hr 0 hrs. (4 $ 62 /hr. 20 hrs. (tP $ 55 /hr. 20 hrs. C $128 /hr. 0 hrs C $ 120 /hr 28 hrs. C. $ 75 /hr 0 hrs. C $ 62 /hr. 16 hrs. C $ 55 /hr. 161 1A 134 $ 2,560.00 $ 0.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 1,612.00 $ 220.00 $6,342.00 $ 1,500.0) (LS) $ 7,842.00 $ 4,096.00 $ 0.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $6,496.00 $ 250.00(LS) $6,746.00 $ 2,048.00 $ 0.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 0.00 S 1.100.00 $7,348.00 $ 3,000.00(1,S) $10,348.00 $ 2,560.00 $ 0.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 0.00 $ 880.00 $ 5,540.00 $ 2,500.00 Schedule of Work: Complete work within 1,,095 days from receipt of the Notice to Proceed which is accompanying this Work Order. Compensation: In accordance with Article Five of the Agreement, the County will compensate the Firm in accordance with the negotiated lump sum amount indicated in the schedule below (if task is time and material, so indicated and use the established hourly stets) as enumerated in Schedule'A' of the Agreement). TOTAL FEE $59,794.00 Any change made subsequent to final department approval will be considered an additional service and charged according to Schedule "A" of the original Contract Agreement. APPROVED BY Darryl Richard , MSTU Project Manager APPROVED BY: Pam Lulich, Landscape Operations Manager .APPROVED BY: Date Date Michelle Edwards Arnold, ATM Director Date APPROVED BY: Norman Feder, Administrator, Growth Management Division ACCEPTED BY: Urban Green Studio Date Signature of Authorized Company Officer Date 'type or Print Name and Title 161 A 1.: W a� Q W m = S � x W W LL o� �Jo m ¢ m O m U O Z O 0 ¢ V > G 0 m o a ¢ ¢ O m m ¢ z a 0 K G 0 m O cQ G O v, W H U_ � 1 Ow t N W Z Vl ¢ J � Q ~ ~ V Z W Z, H Q < U < O w O Q z Z ¢ d 0 w U O �o _O c-, w Z Z J m a�a0 161 1 v c � r a M v �. w I F m ¢ a o ¢ awl w o w v o m m v N N N N N N N 41. w Vy W ¢ N N C O t r a — vw v E � = N � - " N H N ¢ O N = 6 p C U w v m o a ¢ g o N m N Z W µ N o O 0 O 0 O 0 0 OO 0 N SJ 6 N � J N N N N O O O O O N N N N Q VI N N o o Q o o n a u N N an N N N N N U N N WV ti �n tO w M N m N = N N N » dF M o \° v F 0 O j K � � o W U W H a �- ry N n ry .v ry ry F m F 161 1 v c � r � c 3 o a 0 n u m ¢ a o ¢ awl w o w v o m v - N C � 3 r a — vw v E - " H N ¢ O N = 6 p C U w v m o a ¢ g o a1s URBAN GREEN STUDIO RADIO ROAD EAST MSTU PROJECT SCHEDULE November 3, 2010 TASK 2.1 DATA COLLECTION Committee /ATM Review 2.2 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (30 %) Committee /ATM Review 2.5 PUBLIC MEETING #1 2.3 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (60 %) Committee /ATM Review 2.5 PUBLIC MEETING #2 2.4 FINAL DESIGN & C.D.s (90 %) Committee /ATM Review 2.4 FINAL DESIGN & C.D.s (100 %) Committee /ATM Review 1611 A13 f11PAN79_LLla 30 Days from Notice to Proceed 7 days from submittal 60 days from Notice to Proceed 14 days from submittal 14 days from Notice to Proceed 60 days from Notice to Proceed 14 days from submittal 14 days from Notice to Proceed 45 days from Notice to Proceed 14 days from submittal 14 days from Notice to Proceed 14 days from submittal TOTAL THROUGH DESIGN: 300 DAYS (43 weeks) 2.6 BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION 45 days bidding SERVICES 180 days construction Notes: 1. This proposed schedule does not include additional time that may be required for potential FDOT Coordination and review. 2. The schedule does not reflect potential gaps due to situations where the task completion may not coincide with the scheduled MSTU meeting. Fiala / 16 JI � tar(H a+ss Henning Coyle �_._ DEC 0 i 2010 VaJ ;0#N sw A MS. d (. iJ um-niss*ners Advisory Grooftimittee 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Fl, 34104 November 4, 2010 AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order 11. Attendance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of Minutes: October 14, 2010 V. Budget Report VI. Landscape Maintenance Report - CLM VII. Utilities Report - Charles Arthur VIII. Project Manager Report - Darryl Richard IX. Old Business X. Update Report A. Maintenance — Bruce Forman B. Tax Analysis — Bud Martin XI. New Business XII. Public Comment XIII. Adjournment The next meeting is December 2, 2010 at 2:00 P.M. ST. JOHNS PARISH LIFE CENTER 625 111TH Ave. Naples, FL Miso. Corres: Date: 1 a d Item #: � T i �Lt 161 1A14#4 \-/ Va Wwdiet B "eA JIB ATA Advisory Oommittee 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Fl, 34104 October 14, 2010 MINUTES Call Meeting to Order The meeting was called to order by Charles Arthur at 2:00 p.m. A quorum was established. II. Attendance Members: Dick Lydon, Bud Martin, Charles Arthur, Bruce Forman, Bill Gonnering County: Darryl Richard —MSTU Project Manager, Pam Lulich— Landscape Operations Manager Others: Chris Tilman — Malcolm Pirnie, Jeff Gower - Malcolm Pirnie, Jim Fritchey —CLM, Darlene Lafferty — Juristaff III. Approval of Agenda Add. Xl. A. Pathway IX. A. Signs Bud Martin moved to approve the agenda as amended. Second by Bill Gonnering. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. IV. Approval of Minutes — May 6, 2010 Dick Lydon inquired if a letter was sent to the BCC concerning the Beach Property Acquisition. Charles Arthur reported the County changed locations to install the Public Restrooms and Parking Lot (South end of the Beach) therefore the letter to the BCC was not needed. Dick Lydon moved to approve the minutes of May 6, 2010 as submitted. Second by Bill Gonnering. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. V. Budget Report Darryl Richard reviewed the following: (See attached) o Estimated Ad Valorem Tax $1,003,900.00 161114 Discussion took place on an increase in FY11 Ad Valorem Tax compared to FY10. Darryl Richard reviewed the Millage Rate for Fiscal Year(s) in question: • FY10 - .47 • FY11 -.50 • Millage Cap -.50 (was approved by the Committee) • Property Taxable Values are stable in Vanderbilt Beach area Darryl Richard resumed with the Budget Report: • Operating Expense Open P.O.s - $58,997.95 - Eng Fees Line Item 15 - Malcolm Pirnie $37,680.00 - Surveying Fees Line Item 16 - RWA $5,317.95 • Adjusted Balance Sheet was reviewed (See attached) VI. Landscape Maintenance Report-CLM -Jim Fritchey Jim Fritchey reported: • Fertilization and Mulching will commence in two weeks • Dead Coconut Palms were removed • Estimate for Tree Trimming will be submitted to Staff Discussion ensued concerning Tree Trimming and the parties responsible to maintain the Trees. After much discussion it was determined Tree Trimming is a contractual requirement for CLM and considered as routine maintenance. VII. Utilities Report- Charles Arthur reported the following: (See attached) • FPL requires a 5 ft. separation between Water and Power Lines • County Utilities requires 7'/2 ft distance for maintenance access - Water Lines will be relocated - Additional Easements are required (5-6) Chris Tilman gave additional information: • Utility relocation (front of Vanderbilt Bay One) is required for ROW use (on east side) to accommodate the FPL equipment • An informational Meeting will be conducted with (5) Condo Associations • Proposed Easement is not acceptable in the current form to the Property Owner of Location (9) (See attached) - Prefers the Easement be divided between his property and the adjacent South Property - Meeting will be conducted with the Homeowner of the South Property to discuss the Easement issue • (5) Equipment Boxes will be located on Vanderbilt Bay Property • Easement calculation (size) is based on Equipment dimensions • All Easements were approved by FPL with the exception of (1) Location (1A.) 2 1611 A14r Steps taken by Malcolm Pirnie to secure FPL approval for Location (1A) - Designed Utility Relocation Plan - Contractors Scope was drafted for Bid Solicitation - County Transportation is processing the ROW Permit - Review of Plans by Utilities is underway - Hydraulic Hand Calculations will be provided to Utilities in lieu of Hydraulic Modeling (to reduce cost) Chris Tilman reported on the following topics: Vanderbilt Beach MSTU Phase 1 Easement List o Utility relocation removed required Easements in a few locations o Easement List contains all required Easements with the exception of the adjacent Property South of Location (9) o (3) Boxes were relocated 100 ft. North (originally intended in front of Mr. Epright's Property) o Endorsed Easement Agreement Document was obtained from (1) Property Owner - Meeting is planned with Commercial Property Owners in October - November to obtain Easement approval - Residential Property Owners were provided with the Easement Agreement Document status - Pending signature approval Underground Line Burial • Electrical Line Burial is complete at (30) Residential Homes (by ITRAN) • Confirmed $82,500.00 was to relocate Utility (water) Line • Home Owners were notified of illegal or improper connections - Home Owners corrected unacceptable connections with (1) exception - Property of Mr. Bowein - Code Enforcement was contacted concerning the Electrical connections at Mr. Bowein's Residence Darryl Richard gave a status report on the Bowein Property: • Mr. Bowein stated (to Staff) he is working toward correcting the inapt connections • FPL will promptly address the high power line (resting on the roof) as it is perceived as a safety issue • Staff will meet with Senior Building Inspector to confirm if non compliance issues were rectified Discussion ensued concerning the timeline to receive the 25% discount. After discussion it was perceived all Properties must be underground 180 days after completion of Phase IV Project to qualify for the 25% rebate. Chris Tilman recommended obtaining Documentation from FPL to confirm the deadline to receive the 25% rebate. 1611A14 Chris Tilman reported a conference call will be scheduled with FPL and Comcast concerning the timing for Underground Line Burial and Pole removal as the two Companies are in disagreement. Charles Arthur requested to participate on the conference call. Discussion took place on the preliminary draft of the Underground Facilities Conversion Agreement by Comcast. (See attached) Darryl Richard stated the Agreement is under review by County Attorney Office (Scott Teach.) Additionally BCC approval is required. Charles Arthur requested weekly - biweekly meetings with Homeowners to follow up on signatures for Easement Acquisition. VIII. Project Manager Report-Darryl Richard (See attached) Darryl Richard reviewed Change Order No. 2 ($40,000.00) by Malcolm Pirnie for General Consulting Services. (See attached) Bud Martin moved to approve up to $40,000.00 as so stipulated in the (General Consulting Services Change Order No. 2 by Malcolm Pirnie.) Second by Bruce Forman. Chris Tilman clarified the Design of the Utility Relocation and Easement Acquisition was rolled into the General Consulting Services. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Darryl Richard noted Malcolm Pirnie will be issued a Work Order in lieu of a Change Order. IX. Old Business A. Signs Darryl Richard and Bud Martin met with and conveyed to Parks and Recreation the Committees firm opposition on the proposed (Beach Access) Signs. X. Update Report A. Maintenance -Bruce Forman -None B. Tax Analysis -Bud Martin -None XI. New Business A. Pathway Dick Lydon gave the following report on Vanderbilt Drive Greenway Project: (See attached) • Monies ($600,000.00) are remaining from the (Pedestrian) Bridge Funds on Vanderbilt Dr. • Installation of 2 rest stops are proposed on Vanderbilt Dr. between Bluebill Ave. and the River B 1611A14i Perceived filling in ditches on east side of Vanderbilt Dr. to install a Bike Path was necessary (between Bluebill Ave. and Vanderbilt Beach Rd.) Darryl Richard stated a Public meeting is planned to review the Project. He will advise the Committee when the meeting will be held. Discussion ensued on Greenway Project monies and Utility Line Burial. The Committee suggested the following: o Request to earmark available Funds (from the $640,000.00) for the Vanderbilt Beach area to install Bike Paths (South of Bluebill Ave.) Dick Lydon moved that the Committee recommend reconsideration of the expenditures for South of Bluebill to Vanderbilt Dr. and failing that Project delayed North of Bluebill until after Utility Lines are buried. Second by Charles Arthur. Motion carried 4 yes — 1 no - Bud Martin voted no. XII. Public Comment There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the Chair at 3:48 p.m. Vanderbilt Beach MSTU Advisory Committee Charles Arthur, Chairman These minutes approved by the Board /ComTittee on as presented or amended X The next meeting is November 4, 2010 at 2:00 P.M. ST. JOHNS PARISH LIFE CENTER 625 111 TH Ave. Naples, FL. 16 l 1 A14 Report for: November 4, 2010 Meeting Prepared by: Darryl Richard, Project Manger, Collier County Department of Alternative Transportation Modes Vanderbilt Beach MSTU Project Status (VA -35) - AC iIVF -- Water Line Relocation Project — Project V -1 10- 04 -10: Jeff Gower, P.E. provides bid documents for bidding Water Line Relocation Project — Project V -1. Project Plans reviewed by staff. Total Project cost is estimated at: $82,500.00 10- 14 -10: Project Plans are under review by ROW Permit Section. 2 week minimum review period. Upon receipt of ROW Permit Project may be bid through Purchasing Dept. 11- 04 -10: Plans are currently being reviewed by Utilities Department. ROW Permit Issue is pending. (VA -34) - ACS -i' VE - Survey for Phase II & III (PO 4500118493) 10- 14 -10: Survey for Phase 11 and III is on -going and active. 11- 04 -10: staff requested 'check set' plans from RWA for review. (VA -33) - COMPLETED — Conversion of 2 Commercial properties to underground (individual meter connection) 10 -14 -10 Bentley Electric has completed meter conversion of Lighthouse Inn & Kings Crown Condominiums (VA -32) - Partially Completed - with exception of 1 property w/ code issues — Conversion of 31 residential properties to underground (individual meter connection) 10 -14 -10 Itran Partners, Inc. completed 30 property meter conversions; 1 property at 10021 Gulfshore Drive could not be done due to outstanding electrical code violations noted by building inspector. 100% of all residential units are required to have been converted in order to obtain 25% GAF reduction in project cost. 11 -04 -11 Code Enforcement & Building Permitting report that Property owner at 10021 Gulfshore Drive is in the process of bringing the noted code violations into compliance with building code. As soon as property is reported as being 'compliant' with code — staff and Engineer Consultant will review for project to convert this property to underground. (VA -30) - a:;', 'E -- Comcast "Phase One" Coordination 10 -14 -10 Draft Agreement received from Comcast as per tariff 6.310 requirements. Draft is under review at County Attorney's office. Total project cost is estimated to be: $331,351.25. Comcast in 'draft' agreement is requesting a 10% contingency fund. Copy of pole agreements is pending from Comcast. 11 -04 -11 Copy of Pole License agreements between FPL & Comcast is pending. (VA -27) -; , 'I \'_: - Phase One "Underground Facilities Conversion Agreement" (UFCA) 11 -10 -09 COMPLETED for Channel Drive (only); UFCA approved by BCC for'Channel Drive' 11 -04 -10 Overall Phase One UFCA is pending resolution of 'easements' required for Phase One Project; As soon as easements are obtained FPL will proceed with Final Engineering Cost Estimate and production of Final Design Plans for project. (VA -26) - AC 1,'F -- Malcolm Pirnie; (EASEMENT AQUISITION) Review preliminary design provided by FPL 11 -04 -10 Ongoing review of easements and negotiation with property owners in progress. 16! 1 A14 (VA -19) —A- F VE I) ?NGOG b'_; —On Call Services —Malcolm Pirnie Engineering On -going services for meeting attendance and preliminary investigation regarding underground power line installation. 11 -04 -10 Ongoing On -Call Engineering Services by Malcolm Pirnie Engineering (VA -18) — V i_ - — Maintenance Contract — Award to Commercial Land; Annual Maintenance 'base contract' per Quote 11 -04 -10 Ongoing Maintenance Services by Commercial Land Maintenance 161 1A14 Brief summary of "Underground Utilities Conversion" project activity Since December 11, 2007 Initial BCC Approval of Agreement 12 -11 -07 BCC Approval of ROW Agreement with FPL date Dec. 11, 2007 03 -26 -08 TEAM TELECONFERNCE (FPL, COMCAST, COUNTY, MSTU (C.ARTHUR), VBPOA (JACKIE BAMMEL, RWA, MALCOLM PIRNIE) 03 -10 -08 PUBLIC MEETING AT ST. JOHNS 05 -12 -08 Review of RWA Survey w/ Malcolm Pirnie and C. Arthur 06 -05 -09 Confirmation of 4 residential units affected by "Channel Drive Pilot Project" with FPL (Ryan Drum); Field Meeting to review project; Affected Properties are: NANCE, HAROLD 283 CHANNEL BASTANI, KEN K 261 CHANNEL KOHLER, RUTH H 227 CHANNEL REYNOLDS TR, HENRY E 213 CHANNEL 06 -23 -09 CHANNEL DRIVE: Hart's Electrical begins work per PO 4500107832 09 -11 -08 Review of 1st RWA Survey Submittal Sept 11, 2008 09 -12 -08 Confirmation of FPL Red -Line Comments for survey Sep. 12, 2008 09 -17 -08 TEAM TELECONFERENCE (FPL, MALCOLM PIRNIE) 09 -22 -08 FPL "Pot Hole" digs recommended locations identified Sept 22, 2008 11 -21 -08 TEAM MEETING (C. ARTHUR, J. BAMMEL, MALCOLM PIRNIE) 02 -02 -09 FPL Approval of Survey Feb. 4, 2009 02 -04 -09 Staff request $13,027.00 Engineering Deposit Invoice Feb. 4, 2009 03 -09 -09 PUBLIC MEETING AT ST. JOHNS 04 -02 -09 MSTU Committee makes motion to proceed with "Channel Drive Project" 04 -10 -09 Verification of easements for 'private property' April 10, 2009 04 -28 -09 BCC Approval of Modified Ordinance adding installation of powerline within `easement' to private properties. This is to allow installation of power from ROW Line to private property connection. 1611A14 06 -01 -09 CHANNEL DRIVE: Ryan Drumm (FPL) request .pdf of ROW Agreement for review; forwarded via email 06 -25 -09 FPL Draft Design submittal Phase One Plans 06 -26 -09 Staff request (1) Cadd file of Phase One Submittal; (2) Review indicates drawings are not sufficient for bidding purposes; (3) Full size prints 'to scale' requested' 06 -26 -09 TELECONFERNCE ; CALL IN FROM FPL (John Lehr, FPL; Troy Todd, FPL; Ryan Drumm, FPL; Darryl Richard, Collier County) Troy Todd (FPL) clarifies that "tariff charges" apply to Channel Drive Project (ref: Tariff No. 6 per PSC approved Tariff); $566.59 for the 4 properties on Channel Drive 07 -27 -09 CHANNEL DRIVE: Hart's Electrical completed electrical from ROW to Home /Resident for the following Channel Drive Address': 213,283,263 and 227 08 -07 -09 RYAN DRUMM SUBMITTAL — Channel Drive UFCA; and 'Draft' plans; Ryan confirms no existing underground FPL Facilities on Channel Drive 09 -16 -09 RYAN DRUMM 2 "d SUBMITTAL — Channel Drive UFCA (dated 8- 18 -09); and'Final' Channel Drive plans (marked 'check set') 09 -17 -09 CHANNEL DRIVE RESIDENT COORDINATION: Kent Smith called on behalf of Mr. Nance to report that he has received the mailing /letter regarding Channel Drive project and that Mr. Nance chooses to 'not participate' at this time due to financial concerns. He mentioned his wife was in the hospital and that he did not have the money to pay the $650.00 for his "private conversion" to underground. 09 -22 -09 TELECONFERENCE (FPL, COUNTY LEGAL, STAFF, MALCOLM PIRNIE, C. ARTHUR) Recommendations: FPL to submit 'agreement' in word format (if possible); staff to proceed with obtaining payment for'private' underground conversion from property owners Nance and Bastani on Channel Drive. FPL confirms that survey has been accepted and 'Final Plans' are pending for Phase One Project. 09 -21 -09 Ryan Drumm provides FPL Cost Breakdown for Channel Drive; Staff intends to process payment for an "FPL Invoice" upon BCC approval of UFCA (Underground Facilities Conversion Agreement) for Channel Drive; UFCA is pending completion of 'legal review' TOTAL CHANNEL DRIVE COST: $23,242.00 09 -23 -09 Message from Mr. Kent Smith (Legal Representative for Mr. Nance (Property Owner at 283 Channel Drive); Mr. Smith stated that the 'owner' has 'no desire' to underground his private connection, and furthermore has 'no intention of spending any money on his home' (at 283 Channel Drive) related to the power line underground conversion. 09 -24 -09 COMCAST COORDINATION; Channel Drive Plans forwarded to Comcast for quote of underground conversion for Comcast overhead utilities 1611 A14 10 -01 -09 Phase One "Legal Description" forwarded to FPL for confirmation of FPL formal acceptance of 'Legal Description' per'Right of Way Agreement Section 2. Sub - section (d)' 10 -05 -09 FPL ACCEPTANCE OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION; John Lehr via email confirms FPL's official acceptance of the legal description for the Phase One Project; Staff request confirmation of "EXISTING FPL FACILITIES" per'Right of Way Agreement Section 2. Sub - section (e)) documentation of all existing FPL underground facilities within the ROW that will not be included under ROW agreement (for Exhibit C) 10 -06 -09 COMCAST COORINDINATION: Mark Cook informs County Staff that Comcast has re- assigned project review to himself and Andy Vaspasiano; Mark indicates he and Andy are working on "Channel Drive" Cost estimate. * *COMCAST CONFIRMS 100% of conversion of Comcast Utilities is to be by the Vanderbilt Beach MSTU as the project sponsor. Comcast indicates that there will be no 'reductions' in cost due to 'depreciation' of equipment /existing installation. Services are identified as 'new' and 'not in need of upgrade'. Installation of underground conduit for Comcast is through Comcast contractor managed 'entirely by Comcast'. 10 -09 -09 Malcolm Pirnie submits letter for review of Project Drawing submittals and recommendation related to which party should install the underground conduit for Phase One Project 10 -12 -09 County Legal provides legal opinion from Nabors Giblin & Nickerson, 1500 Mahan Drive, Suite 200, Tallahassee, Florida 32308 (letter dated 10 -8 -09 Gregory T. Stewart 10 -12 -09 RWA Proposal submitted for survey of Phase II, III, and IV 10 -13 -09 TELECONFERENCE (C. ARTHUR, STAFF, MALCOLM PIRNIE) 10 -14 -09 FPL SUBMITTAL; PLANS FOR PHASE ONE PROJECT (Marked 'Preliminary') 10 -14 -09 John Lehr notifies staff (via phone call evening of 10- 14 -09) that the'one page' agreement submitted on 8 -7 -09 has to be revised to a new 4 page agreement (delivery pending from FPL) 10 -22 -09 John Hart Electrical received check for $650.00 for Bastani on Channel Drive 'Private Can Conversion to underground. 10 -28 -09 Bastani Channel Drive private conversion project completed by Hart's Electrical 10 -28 -09 Revised UFCA Agreement received from FPL for BCC approval on Nov. 10, 2009 11 -03 -09 Confirmation of Comcast cost for Channel Drive Project is $4,000.00 per FPL plans. 11 -03 -09 Scott Teach and Michelle Arnold teleconference with Nabors Giblin & Nickerson results of teleconference to be presented at 11 -05 -09 MSTU meeting. 161 1 A14 11 -05 -09 Discussion Nabors Giblin & Nickerson legal consult related to 'underground conversion' and potential 'ordinance'; Committee makes motion to direct staff to pursue Ordinance for the MSTU to pay for homeowner's conversion and Ordinance to 'require' participation and mechanism to address non - participation. 11 -10 -09 BCC Approval of UFCA Agreement with FPL for Channel Drive 'pilot project' 11 -10 -09 Field Meeting to review Proposed "Easements" for Phase One Project; Ryan Drum FPL was in attendance with Chris Tilman, Darryl Richard, Jeff Gower, and Charlie Arthur. Inspection indicated that all of the easements proposed were not necessary, and that 'alternative' site planning would locate the electrical boxes within existing ROW. Follow - up meeting with John Lehr scheduled for December 8, 2009 (1 pm) 12 -08 -09 Meeting with FPL (John Lehr, Kate Donofrio, Ryan Drum) and Malcolm Pirnie (Chris Tilman, Jeff Gower) and County Staff (Darryl Richard); Review of easements proposed; approximately 50% of easements were determined to not be necessary; However, the other 50% of easements require (1) detailed re- survey, (2) placement of stakes in field identifying ROW and property lines, and (3) re- identification of utilities in the field (call into Florida One Call system) Staff will coordinate with Malcolm Pirnie and RWA for necessary project activity; additional proposal from RWA is necessary for scope of work identified. Proposal from Malcolm Pirnie for'easement acquisition' is also recommended at this time in anticipation of possible requirement for easements. 12 -15 -09 BCC Approval of Ordinance Modification to add 'private' connections to MSTU Ordinance thus allowing MSTU to complete 100% of private meter connections as required to obtain 25% GAF waiver from FPL. O1 -04 -10 Draft Letter to 37 residents requiring underground conversion for meter connection under review 01 -04 -10 Channel Drive Project Under Construction 01 -19 -10 Letter sent to 35 residents in Phase One Project that have 'overhead' meter connections; staff is monitoring confirmation of receipt of this mailing by Certified Mail 02 -09 -10 Channel Drive Project 90% completed; missing 2 transformer boxes pending from FPL; Comcast is 100% installed on Channel Drive. 02 -09 -10 RWA Delivers 13 exhibits for locations for transformers and switch cabinets; These exhibits will be used in review of proposed easements by FPL in Preliminary Design 02 -09 -10 Malcolm Pirnie provides Final Bid Documents for Electrical Conversion of 35 properties in Phase One Project which have existing overhead meter connections. Staff preparing bid for advertisement and release to 'all bidders' not restricted to annual contractors. 16111A14 03 -04 -10 MSTU Committee awards bid to ITran Partners, Inc. for underground conversion of 31 private residential units. It was determined that only 2 additional properties require underground conversion. Since the 2 additional properties are 'Commercial Property' and will require extensive review and investigation prior to conversion —these will be handled through Collier County Annual Electrical Contractor. 03 -11 -10 Meeting with ITran Partners to review 31 properties to be undergrounded. Some properties were noted as 'possible change order items'; namely saw cutting concrete driveway and re- installation of concrete slab over newly installed conduit. Malcolm Pirnie is assisting staff in review of each property and related 'issues' that may require further review. 03 -24 -10 EASEMENT ACQUISITION MEETING: 9895 Gulf Shore Dr.; Laplaya LLC; Jeremy Arnold, PE; Barron Collier Enterprises Summary: Mr. Anrold was very agreeable to granting easement 03 -26 -10 EASEMENT ACQUISITION MEETING: 10352 Gulf Shore Dr.; Mr. Epright; Summary: Mr. Epright is not agreeable to all 4 boxes being located on his property. He would like for the County to pursue alternative of placement of "2 boxes North of his property line —on the Condo Property' (10420 GULF SHORE DR; "Vanderbilt Bay Condominiums); Staff will coordinate with Engineer Consultant in bringing an alternative solution to the property owner; after preliminary review /approval by FPL as a viable alternative 03 -26 -10 Meeting with ITran Partners to review further'more in depth' some of the technical issues related to each property conversion. Further coordination with FPL (Troy Todd) to identify certain items which appear to be 'non-standard' installations and modifications to FPL's meter connections is required. 03 -30 -10 All Tariff charges for the 31 properties have been approved for payment to FPL. Note there is a $566.59 Tariff charge for each of the 31 properties. Material supply for conduit will be by FPL for the residential units. With wire being 'pulled' by FPL. FPL will notify County once material supply has been received and is in stock. 03 -30 -10 EASEMENT ACQUISITION MEETING: 9635 Gulf Shore Dr.; Casa Grande Summary: Pam Pettit (Manager) and the Board President of Casa Grande. Appeared to be in agreement with granting easement. Was in favor of project. 03 -31 -10 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY CONVERSION: Meeting with Bentley Electric to review project details for conversion of 2 Commercial Properties (1) 9140 GULF SHORE DR (Hotel /INN) (2) 10540 Gulf Shore Dr (multi -unit condo) Bentley Electric to provide quote under annual contract 09 -5325 On Call Electrical Services Contract 03 -31 -10 Malcolm Pirnie Provides layout alternatives (Options 1, 2, and 3) for Mr. Epright's property. All 3 alternatives require an easement of some sort. FPL appears to be 7 161 1 A 1 4 interested in Option #1 which places 2 boxes to the north parcel and 2 boxes on /near Mr. Epright's property. (requires easement from both property owners) 04 -01 -10 Meeting with Lighthouse Hotel Owner Kevin Dugan regarding easement. Kevin is in favor of project and is willing to provide easement 04 -06 -10 ITran Partners begin underground conversion of 31 Commercial Properties. 04 -21 -10 Meeting with Charles Chaffee; Mr. Chaffee is in favor of project and will provide easement 04 -21 -10 Meeting with Mr. Epright; Mr. Epright is not in favor of project and is willing to offer very limited easement (5 ft. along Northern Edge of property) 04 -28 -10 Meeting to review proposed Park & Recreation plans for 1111" Ave. parking lot. It was determined that no conflict exist between MSTU FPL Project and proposed changes by Park & Recreation. 04 -30 -10 Final Draft for Agreements for (3) Three Easements submitted to Kevin Hendricks, Director, Collier County Property Acquisitions 04 -30 -10 Easement Exhibits received from Malcolm Pirnie 05 -03 -10 Meeting with Collier County Utilities (Joe Thomas, P.E.) regarding the easement proposal for Vanderbilt Towers (North of Epright Property); Proposed alternative involves relocation and /or disconnection of existing water force main. Joe Thomas, Collier County Utilities indicates his staff will have to review what is proposed and then get back to Malcolm Pirnie /Staff. Note: a 7.5 foot off -set requirement is noted as being 'required for our project'; staff /consultant had previously been utilizing 5 ft. off -set per FPL requirements for existing utilities. Malcolm Pirnie is to provide an exhibit for Joe Thomas illustrating the locations for utility boxes and off -sets as relates to utilities (water main lines in particular) Wednesday, May 26, 2010 Follow -up meeting with Collier County Utilities (Joe Thomas, P.E.) regarding relocation of water main for required off -set for FPL utility boxes. Friday, June 18, 2010 Notice to Proceed sent to RWA for Phase II & III Survey; P. O. #4500118493; CONTRACT: RFP #06 -3944 Annual Fixed Term Surveying & Photogrammetric Services; 360 day contract period. Thursday, June 24, 2010 Inspection of Residential Electrical Meters - Vanderbilt Beach MSTU 1) 10021 Gulfshore Dr; BOWEIN, LLOYD L; LURLINE S BOWEIN; 10021 GULF SHORE DR; NAPLES FL 34108; FOLIO NO. 27530040005; FAILED INSPECTION; CODE DEFICIENCIES NOTED BY BUILDING INSPECTOR. PROPERTY REFERED TO CODE ENFORCEMENT FOR CODE RELATED DEFIECIENCIES. 2) 10091 Gulfshore; FORMS, ROBERT C =& DEBRA J; 10091 GULF SHORE DR; NAPLES FL 34108; PHONE: 239 -254- 8484; Mobile: (230) 641 -8000; PROPERTY OWNER PAID ELECTRICIAN UNDER PRIVATE CONTRACT TO RESOLVE CODE DEFIECIENCIES; STATUS: RESOLVED. I if q� 1611A14 Friday, August 27, 2010 Comcast Coordination Meeting; Review of basic requirements for agreement per Tariff 6.310 (Fla. PSC Approved Tariff regarding underground conversion of powerlines) September 23, 2010 Comcast Coordination Meeting; Update on progress toward 'draft agreement' And discussion /clarification of details related to project. Monday, October 04, 2010 Jeff Gower, P.E. provides bid documents for bidding Water Line Relocation Project— Project V -1. Project Plans reviewed by staff. Total Project cost is estimated at: $82,500.00 Friday, October 08, 2010 First Draft of Comcast Agreement with Vanderbilt Beach MSTU /Collier County received and forwarded to County Attorney's office for review. Tuesday, October 12, 2010 ROW Section confirms Water -line relocation project is being tracked under ROW Permit Application #10 -0520. ROW Permit is required prior to bidding project. Tuesday, October 12, 2010 Jeff Gower, P.E. confirms that FPL has 'approved' 12 out of the 13 total easement proposals. Staff and consultant are negotiating with property owners in obtaining owner approval of proposed easements. LIST OF PROPOSED EASEMENTS: Easement No. Owner /Parcel No. 1A 3 Vanderbilt Shores 1 4 Vanderbilt Bay Condo Phase 2 2 5A Chaffee 3 5A Thompson 4 9 Chaffee2 5 11 Mario Costantini 6 12 La Playa 7 13 Villas of Vanderbilt Beach 8 14 Casa Grande 9 15 Manatee Resort 10 16 Vanderbilt Beach LLC 11 17 The Watermark Condo 12 18 & 19Vanderbilt Beach Motel Easement Size FPL Review 15'x40' In Progress 4'x 10' Approved Tx 10' Approved 5' x 5' Approved 3' x 10' Approved Tx 10' Approved 5'x 20' Approved 2'x 10' Approved 20' x 20' Approved 1' x 10' Approved 4'x 13' Approved 4'x 13' Approved Tx 20' Approved Thursday, October 13, 2010 Code Enforcement meeting with Property Owner at 10021 Gulfshore Drive (Bowein); Code Case # Code case reference #CEPM20100017920 Summary: /S 1611 A14 Code Enforcement Staff (Susana Capasso, Supervisor, North Naples District) meeting with Mr. Bowein. Mr. Bowein has coordinated with FPL and the electrical wire that was resting across the roof has been addressed (inspection pending). He is working on the closing the open permit for replacement of windows and will be working with Mark Thomas, Building Inspector, Building Review & Permitting, on the electrical code deficiencies noted. Monday, November 1, 2010 Code Enforcement meeting with Property Owner at 10021 Gulfshore Drive ( Bowein); Code Case # Code case reference #CEPM20100017920 Summary: Resident had obtained services from an electrician (company name undisclosed) and had met with Richard Long, Chief Building Inspector to review the details related to the code deficiencies at 10021 Gulfshore Drive. 1� a � V = q H & a m Z• 0 U a w �gg8 1611 N Om OeN' M JO m1f q n O N wN r g m Noi. o I i I• i.•. I O N » N Om OeN' M JO m1f A14 N N i I I n rrwo mmw�oo m, (o(VViw oyyfN r�'oo n p� mof �.ym a N �m » N r by Oq� Y pO $OCQ P N 0 0 0 N N �mV9 S r N _ ' C W J n� m ' �3U e�� rt p$pS U @�@ g }Sg LL��y� q�6FU Z �,�p DE ygrJC�ap q q n O N O ae r m tNV m • I i I• i.•. I w OwN� 00 <� nb0 OO!OOOOhOA�pNP m�O O� m O �O p{rn� s M m! A NVIN OG � OF OOn NIppVnB8 OO pOp yy�ym� ryry Nw$$�� O'VI OImO�mC1NNOQmS ICI b.pp OmINO m v.rvv oN _ yOy AQ� ONO-•- � O tN0 OQIP .O_.��vO.Q.. O 7 OI N » N O » uj A14 N N i I I n rrwo mmw�oo m, (o(VViw oyyfN r�'oo n p� mof �.ym a N �m » N r by Oq� Y pO $OCQ P N 0 0 0 N N �mV9 S r N _ ' C W J n� m ' �3U e�� rt p$pS U @�@ g }Sg LL��y� q�6FU Z �,�p DE ygrJC�ap q gA W N A- A W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N + + + + + + + ++ I L O (D OD V A N W N+ O M ao V T U A W N O b CO V m Q A W N+ O m� V pi Cn A W h Amipmm Al 1pgRA00mpmom3 §vZ *m00oSZCim'.�AmDD�A�Amzz :MM 28001 DD qO M- imm >M-OZ- MO DTAVOimm" ': NT«ZZ Zm m X >p 010 m m Z ,(� Z 2 pp A m= a a GG m -4� -i � m d o m D N m A Z A M ,n p n 0 q m: m m m m 'gym c y 3 i 0 0 m m -i ^� O p m Z v p o p c zb m O i n m m O a -� Z m m. A m O O Z m m 'i m -;b a D CI) . p N j cm Om mm<mm ZPmO G) z �00O N... yAAA 0) -4 Z r'r• 00§ Z Z C� Z m�= P A O- m y m A -A fz y m m O< a a 0 0 C x Z O p 'U "D9 -4 n V Z m Z toil z Z Z N z 3 p p c m m N p rc; Z 0 3yy D c O -ml Z 3 0 p O Z m v cp p" n r r D C,.m m Z 0 A m m x X < N m Z r A n O N N ,.•H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H '.V�Y H H H H H H H H H H H H 3 W N W W OVO O{�t VO A W ao W A V N S lOJ W N am. O V7 W U V N N O O W W W W O N+ W N O O O V N 50 1Op (A� 88 88 88 OO 88 pO j A N O O O O O O O N f[T N O O+ O A S ma O O O+ O O O S p S O O t Vt�� V c�Vpp S S O O O O O O S O O OO S O V O O N o o S 1 S O o o m a S m o m o ' S' O O H H H H H H H M H M VJ N v3 u, yr VI W W ti N to v� [n 4] Ir 1 cn fn ut H H H H H H H H H H H H H- i � 3 N 8 a H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H W N N O) 4 < Lt W p N D CC 'S m oo �J _m N O N (D O ID O c C C [P G O) N Vi A Vr O J O O O aO o au 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H N -NP -- M + fD OD N O o S O O O V O S o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o a o O S S S o O o O O O '1 � r P7 8 qO y $ ± g3Q t00 O � W 0 A A U H f» H HIHIH H H H D n C d W N N O) 3 < 3 O OWf V Ut A m m m oo H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H N -NP -- M + fD OD N O o S O O O V O S o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o a o O S S S o O o O O O '1 � r P7 8 qO y $ ± g3Q t00 O � W 0 A A U H f» H HIHIH H H H D n C d V O lA 14 2 y O Z -n O 3 c M Z O m A � A N"3 o w o c c 3 < 3 5 5 m m m m oo o _m W O N O N m a aO o au o m O V O lA 14 2 y O Z -n O 3 c M Z O m A � A N"3 o w o c c 3 < 3 5 5 m m m m oo o _m m a O _ o g E ' 5�110 go m 3 " 5353 3 -m p n o =' p' c 0 m FDMC5 Mm S C" in pa<cvv0 u m c. m m 0 0 F0 m c D— m m m CD 0:5 m m m o o m m c m R' x a= r = - m m � — OR y N 0 p m F m A A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O Z +0 8 0 N N N N N N D DA + O +M N N N ONO UN + OND m _ W m A O V W m V m N V to l/t Cp N Ut Ul to (n lil U) [/i (/1 4n 1Fl 4� Vi (!� N lP -J P� W A W N A tAp d O W W O C O N O O O m - tJt O ' oin -mo o o ow�ao val O tT W U U O O U O m O N O H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H W J dl +A m O)+ m Q) N tD (D A W O+ N N O O Vt Ja O U O O O V O V O lA 14 2 y O Z -n O 3 c M Z O m A � A N"3 o w o c c 16 161 Jan>� 14, 2011 MINUTES OF THE HEARING OF THE j� 3039W3 COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IWnjl II�II Fiala E tt /G 0 i Hiller Naples, Florida, January 14, 2011 Henning Coyl© BY ........................ Coletta LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Special Magistrate, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Administrative Building "F," 3rd floor, Collier County Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following persons present: SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: Honorable Brenda Garretson ALSO PRESENT: Jennifer Waldron Baker, Code Enforcement Supervisor Kerry Adams, Code Enforcement Administrative Secretary Misc. Cones: Date: a °I Item #:�i 161 181 January 14, 2011 I. CALL TO ORDER: The Honorable Special Magistrate Brenda Garretson called the Hearing to order at 9:00 AM. The individuals testifying at the proceeding did so under oath. A. Special Magistrate Garretson outlined the Rules and Regulations to be observed during the Hearing. The Special Magistrate noted that, prior to conducting the Hearing, Respondents were given an opportunity to speak with their Investigating Officers for a Resolution by Stipulation. The goal is to obtain compliance without being punitive. RECESS: 9:15 AM RECONVENED: 9:37 AM IL APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Jennifer Waldron Baker, Code Enforcement Supervisor, noted the following changes: (a) Under Item V (B), "Hearings," the following cases were WITHDRAWNby the County: • Agenda #1, Case #SO 173513 — CEEX 20100021517 — BCC vs. Kevin T. Rozankowski • Agenda #3, Case #PR 044864 — CEEX 20100019721— BCC vs. James L. Kaufman • Agenda #6, Case #CE 003757 — CEPE 20100021825 — BCC vs. Barbara S. Kennedy • Agenda #8, Case #CEPM 20100020076 — BCC vs. Thomas and Cherlyn Edwards • Agenda 99, Case #CESD 20100017536 — BCC vs. PebbleBrooke Lakes Master Association, Inc. • Agenda #14, Case # CESD 20100017606 — BCC vs. Wesley and Beth A. Chronister • Agenda #23, Case # CEPM 20100020075 — BCC vs. Jefferson and Tammy Roberts (b) Under Item VI (A), "Motion for Imposition of Fines," the following cases were WITHDRAWN by the County: • Agenda #3, Case #CENA 20100006172 — BCC vs. Katherine Sheffield • Agenda #6, Case #CEAU 20090008537 — BCC vs. Anton Karaba and Eva Karabova • Agenda #10, Case #CESD 20090005153 — BCC vs. Luis Eduardo Venegas (c) Under Item VII (B), "Motion to Rescind Previously- Issued Orders," the following case has been ADDED by the County: • Agenda #2, Case #CENA 20100018192 — BCC vs. Richard Wineholt The Special Magistrate approved the Agenda as amended, subject to changes made during the course of the Hearing at the discretion of the Special Magistrate. III. 161 1 B 1 4January 14, 2011 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: (a) Special Magistrate Hearing -December 3, 2010 The Minutes of the Special Magistrate Hearing held on December 3, 2010 were reviewed by the Special Magistrate and approved as submitted (b) Dangerous Dog Hearing -December 17, 2010 The Minutes of the Special Magistrate Hearing held on December 17, 2010 were reviewed by the Special Magistrate and approved as submitted IV. MOTIONS: A. Motion for Extension of Time: 1. Case #CEPM 20100004757 — BCC vs. Paul- Michael Conroy The Respondent requested the Hearing and was present. Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joseph Mucha was also present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22, Article VI, Section 22 -231 12 (C) Occupied structure with incomplete re -roof. Folio No: 35775120002 Violation address: 4449 19th Place SW, Naples The Respondent resides at 4449 19'h Place SW, Naples, Florida 34116. The Special Magistrate noted the Respondent submitted a letter requesting additional time. Investigator Mucha stated the Respondent has been in contact with the County, has been working toward abating the Violation, and there were no objections to granting the extension of time to comply. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to February 14, 2011. B. Motion for Re- Hearing: 1. Case #CESD 20090000340 — BCC vs. John M. Mueller, Jr. & Elizabeth Mueller Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan Masse requested the Hearing and was present. Respondent, John M. Mueller, Jr., was also present. 161 1 B - January 14, 2011 Violations: Collier County Code of Laws, Chapter 22, Buildings and Building Regulations, Article II, Florida Building Code, Adoption and Amendment of The Florida Building Code, Section 22- 26(b)(104.5.1.4.4). Fence Permit #2006120659 - issued on 12 -7 -06, expired 6 -5 -07. No final inspection made. No certificate of completion issued. Folio No: 66480400002 Violation address: 834 Bentwood Drive, Naples The Special Magistrate deferred hearing the case until later in the proceedings. VL NEW BUSINESS: A. Motion for Imposition of Fines: 9. Case #2007030338 — BCC vs. Jean Claude Martel The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Azure Sorrels. The Respondent was also present. Violations: Collier County Ordinance 2005 -44, Sections 6, 7, and 8. Numerous items of litter were observed on the residential property, including but not limited to: excessive amounts of wood, screens, tires, grills, buckets, treadmills, aluminum, a washer and dryer, televisions, furniture, tubing, doors, windows, containers and metal. Folio No: 61839320000 Violation address: 3190 Karen Drive, Naples The Respondent resides at 3190 Karen Drive, Naples, Florida 34112. The Initial Order was issued on June 15, 2007. The Investigator stated the violations were abated by the County on August 2, 2007. Fines have accrued at the rate of $100.00 per day for the period from June 23, 2007 through August 2, 2007 (41 days) for a total fine amount of $4,100.00. Abatement costs in the amount of $11,200.00 have not been paid. Previously assessed Operational Costs of $267.68 have not been paid. The total amount due to date is $15,567.68. The Respondent was unable to offer an explanation as to why he did not abate the violation and stated he would move certain items to his commercial property. The Special Magistrate advised the Respondent to consult with Code Enforcement to determine what he could or could not transfer to his commercial property. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for Imposition of Fines but reduced the total amount due to $11,467.68. 161 BI 4 January 14, 2011 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Stipulations: None B. Hearings: 2. Case #SO 166868 — CEEX 20100021027 — BCC vs. Vince E. Bentiven a The Respondent requested the Hearing and was present. Collier County Sheriff's Office Deputy Wilfred Klinkman was not present. Violations: Code of Law & Ord., Sec. 130 -67 Handicapped space. Violation address: Walmart, 6650 Collier Blvd, Naples The Respondent noted the Deputy Sheriff was not present and made a Motion to Dismiss the violation. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the Respondent's Motion for a Dismissal. 4. Case #PR 044925 — CEEX 20100021513 — BCC vs. Steven I Reader The Respondent requested the Hearing and was present. Collier County Park Ranger Carol Buckler was also present. Violations: Code of Law & Ord., Sec. 130 -66 Failure to display paid launch receipt Violation address: Goodland Boat Ramp The Respondent resides at 280 13`h Street SW, Naples, Florida 34117. The Respondent stated he paid the boat ramp fee but did not receive a receipt from the cashier. He further stated there were no signs indicating a receipt was to be displayed on the windshield. He requested to see a copy of the register receipt but the cashier told him it was not available. Park Ranger Buckler stated the Dock Master informed her the County's policy is to issue a receipt and for the individual to be instructed that the receipt is to be displayed on the dashboard of the vehicle. She had a copy of the transactions that took place at the Marina during the date in question and confirmed the Respondent did pay the $8.00 fee. She verified there was no sign at the Marina, but stated instructions were given verbally to each individual as the fee was paid. The Respondent reiterated he did not receive a receipt from the cashier. He stated he had not used County facilities in years, and it was his first trip to the new Marina at Goodland. 161 1 6 1 J4ary 14, 2011 The Special Magistrate noted there was no testimony from the cashier to challenge the Respondent's claim that he did not receipt a receipt or instruction The Special Magistrated ruled the Respondent was NOT GUILTY. The Respondent requested the Hearing and was present. Collier County Park Ranger Carol Buckler was present on behalf of Park Ranger Cynthia Gaynor. Violations: Code of Law & Ord., Sec. 130 -66 Boat launch sticker not permanently affixed to trailer Violation address: Goodland Marina The Respondent resides at 627 Palm Avenue East, Goodland, Florida 34140. The Respondent introduced the following Exhibits which were marked and admitted into evidence: • Composite Exhibit #1 — copy of the State Statute, Chapter 130 • Composite Exhibit #2 — copy of Ordinance #2001 -33 • Exhibit #3 — copy of Resolution #2010 -201 • Exhibit 44 — copy of Resolution #2008 -283 • Exhibit 45 — copy of Boat Launch Permit (non - commercial) • Exhibit 46 — aerial photograph (Property Appraiser's office) • Composite Exhibit #7 — two photographs taken on November 9, 2010 • Composite Exhibit 48 — one photograph taken on January 9, 2011 and a copy of the boat trailer registration The Respondent stated he had not seen the Exhibits to be presented by the County. The Special Magistrate stayed the case in order for the parties to review each other's exhibits. Collier County Public Utilities Compliance Officer Tonya Phillips requested the Hearing and was present. Senior Investigator Ray Addison was also present. Cindy Walters, Regional Property Manager for Proxy Pro Management, and Solange Michaels, represented the Respondent. Violations: Code of Law & Ord., Sec. 19 C (9) Litter on ground and in roll -off with no cover lids, creating a Health, Safety, and Welfare Issue. Litter includes, but is not limited to: paper, plastic, and putrescible waste not properly stored. Folio No: 00296840003 Violation address: 8690 Weir Drive, Naples 161161 January 14, 2011 Officer Phillips stated the case is a Continuance of a Hearing initially held on December 17, 2010. She has made several trips to the property. The Respondent was found in violation for a period of seven days but confirmed that it has made efforts to keep the property cleaned. The compactor area has been cleaned and bleached. The Special Magistrate noted the Respondent had previously been found in violation. Cindy Walters resides at 5421 Ginger Cove, Tampa, Florida 33634. Solange Michaels resides at 4030 Winkler Avenue, 4204, Fort Myers, Florida 33916. Ms. Walters introducted the following Exhibits which were marked and admitted into evidence: • Exhibit #1 —copy of Notice to Residents • Composite Exhibit 42 — copy of correspondence regarding ordering of "dummy" cameras and confirmation (3 pages) • Composite Exhibit #3 — copy of correspondence regarding ordering of signage and confirmation (3 pages) Ms. Walters stated the maintenance staff had been replaced and introduced the new maintenance supervisor and the groundskeeper. Additional trash receptacles were placed around the property. She further stated the cameras will be installed as soon as they arrive. Officer Phillips noted the Sheriffs Department will begin a Neighborhood Watch program for the residents in the near future. The Special Magistrate ruled since the Respondent complied with the terms of the initial Order, only the Operational Cost of $50.00 will be imposed Total Amount Due: $50.00 10. Case #CEPM 20100018182 — BCC vs. MTAG Cust for Pine Asset M mt Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator James Seabasty requested the Hearing and was present. Lt. Mark Milliken, Collier County Sheriff s Office, was also present. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22, Building and Building Regulations, Article VI - Property Maintenance Code, Section(s) 22- 231(12)(g), 22- 231(12)(i), 22- 231(12)(f), 22- 231(12)(b), 22- 231(12)(d), 22- 242(b), and 22 -243 Multiple violations consisting of but not limited to: mold throughout exterior of mobile home, porch and stairs rotting, broken windows, boarded doors, etc. 16 11 B1 January 14, 2011 Folio No: 1132320000 Violation address: 237 McBeth Way, Naples The Notice of Hearing was sent via Certified Mail on December 29, 2010 and proof of delivery on January 3, 2011 was provided by the U.S. Postal Service. The property and the Courthouse were posted on January 4, 2011. Investigator Seabasty stated the property has been neglected for years and is vacant. The property had been boarded at one time, but the boards were ripped off. Drug paraphernalia has been spotted at the premises. Lt Milliken stated the mobile home has been monitored since March 2008, and provides an area for suspicious inidviduals to "hang out." The front door had been pad - locked, but is now open and unsecured. He introduced the following Exhibits which were marked and admitted into evidence: Composite "A" - five photographs (shed) taken on January 12, 2011 "B" — a sworn statement from Gary Thompson, dated January 13, 2011 Composite "C" — five photographs (mobile home) taken on January 12th Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to hire a licensed General Contractor to obtain either the necessary Permits to repair the structure, all required inspections and a Certificate of Occupancy, or obtain a Demolition Permit to demolish the mobile home and shed, all required inspections and a Certificate of Completion on or before January 28, 2011, or a fine of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent is to notify the Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by Contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the Respondent. If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case for $112.82 on or before February 14, 2011. TotalAmountDue: $112.82 The Hearing of the following Case was resumed by the Special Magistrate. .�. a.aoc rra ac vrov i� — t,r.r.A GVIVVUG1V94 — l5l.l. VS. KIChBra liBrRe' The Respondent verified he reviewed the County's Exhibits. He stated on 16 I 1j)i ill" Jivary 14, 2011 November 10, 2010, he launched his boat at the Goodland Marina and then parked his truck and the trailer. The Citation he received described the Violation as "boat launch sticker not permanently affixed to trailer." He cited the Ordinance and claimed there was no relationship to his use of the boat launch facilities. He did not try to avoid payment of the launch fees and was not outside the facility or in the Right -of -Way. Park Ranger Buckler stated the Citation was issued as "not being permanently affixed to the trailer. " The Permit was issued to the boat trailer license plate, and not the truck. She provided a copy of Collier County Parks and Recreation Policies and Procedures to the Special Magistrate and a copy of a Notice ( "directive ") given to individuals purchasing Permits which details the correct placement of the Permit. The Respondent stated the words "permanently affixed" do not exist in the Ordinance, Resolution, or Rule. The language used was " ... displayed on the trailer or vehicle. " He stated the provision applied only to those parking outside of the area. The Park Ranger stated if an individual chooses not to purchase a recreational launch permit, he /she can pay each time they visit the Marina and must display the parking receipt on the dashboard. The recreational permit must be displayed on the trailer, not on a truck. The Park Ranger stated the Procedures applied to the parking lot as well. The Special Magistrate stated it appeared that the Ordinance was not properly written. The Special Magistrate explained her decision will be to determine if the Policies and Procedures of the Parks and Recreation follows the County's Ordinance. The Respondent directed the Special Magistrate to his Exhibits (sheets 6 and 7), and stated that the paragraph addressing boat launch facility fees did not specify where boat launch permits are to be placed. The most current Resolution ( #2010 -201) did not specify location of the boat launch permits. (Assistant County Attorney Jeff Wright arrived at 11:37 AM) The Special Magistrate explained the Respondent claimed the provision cited only applies to those individuals who launch in a County facility but then park outside the facility and /or in areas such as a Right -of -Way where parking is not allowed. Assistant County Attorney Wright stated the Ordinance does not allow parking of a boat trailer or other vehicle "in whole or in part on a paved or unpaved public right - of -way within one mile of the nearest entrance to a County Park or other facility that includes the boat launch ramp. " RECESS: 11:45 AM 161 181 RECONVENED: 11:57 AM January 14, 2011 5. Case #PR 045073 — CEEX 20100021044 — BCC vs. Richard Karnes Assistant County Attorney Wright stated the County had withdrawn the case due to the ambiguities that were raised. (Note: The following cases were heard together at the request of Code Enforcement.) 18. Case #CENA 20100020171— BCC vs. Koresh Properties LLC and 19. Case #CENA 20100020183 — BCC vs. Koresh Properties LLC Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Renald Paul requested the Hearing and was present. Investigative Supervisor Jeff Letourneau was also present. The Respondent was represented by Babak Gohari, Manager. Violations: ( #18) Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Section 2.02.03 Illegal storage of roof tiles on vacant lot. Folio No: 26169502025 Violation address: 2969 Coco Lakes Dr, Naples Violations: ( #19) Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Section 2.02.03 Illegal storage of roof tiles on vacant lot. Folio No: 26169502041 Violation address: 2964 Coco Lakes Dr, Naples Mr. Gohari resides at 880 Trade Winds Bend, Weston, Florida 33327 and stated he is one of the managers of Koresh Properties. He verified he has the authority to act on behalf of the LLC. Invesitgator Paul presented one photograph, dated January 13, 2011, of both lots (side by side) which was marked as County's Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. He spoke with a Property Manager ( "Thomas ") and met with him at the site to explain the violation. The violation has not been abated. Mr. Gohari introduced the following Exhibits which were marked as follows and admitted into evidence: • Composite " #1" —seven photographs of the area, dated January 13, 2011 • Composite " #2" — developer's Site Plan (two views) of the location (recorded with the County) 10 16 I 1 81 January 14, 2011 The Special Magistrate reviewed the photographs as they related to the location on the Site Plan. Mr. Gohari stated the Respondent's defenses: • The Respondent is not in violation of the Ordinance because the Respondent is not a tile manufacturer and the tiles were not abandoned He explained the tiles were ordered when construction was booming in 2006. The tiles were uncrated and moved to the current location in the back of the property in a fenced off area on a vacant lot. The tiles are construction materials and are listed on an PUD with active construction The tiles were to be used on three permitted homes. However, the developer will be constructing 11 "spec homes" and in in the process of securing funding for the project. The tiles will be used for these homes. • Second defense: The Respondent is being unfairly targeted due to the actions of one "disgruntled" neighbor who tried to buy additional lots from the developer. When the developer refused, the individual began a campaign of complaints to the County and generated over 370 emails of complaints.. Mr. Gohari stated the Respondent is attempting to obtain a Staging Permit from the Building Department. The tiles cost between $40 - $50K and to move then again after they have been uncrated would destroy them. Supervisor Letourneau stated the tiles can be moved to an off -site location without being destroyed. He stated there were no active permits for future construction at the site. He further stated the County would not issue a Shed Permit because the lots were unimproved and did not have the required primary strucutre. The Respondent reiterated the tiles were construction materials and not debris. The Special Magistrate noted the Respondent had not presented a legal defense to the Ordinance and stated that a violation does exist. The Investigator stated the recommendations applied to each case: Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to cease storage of roof tiles on the vacant lot and remove from the property on or before February 14, 2011, or a fine of $50.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent is to notes the Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by Contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the Respondent. If necessary, assistance may be requestedfrom the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. VI. 81 161 1 January 14, 2011 The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the cases for $113.00 per case on or before February 14, 2011. Total Amount Due: $226.00 A. Motion for Imposition of Fines: 5. Case #CEV 20100007074 — BCC vs. Timothy Steiner The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Renald Paul. The Respondent was present. Violations: Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Section 2.01.00(A) Trailers on site with invalid license plates. Folio No: 38160640000 Violation address: 6291 Copper Leaf Lane, Naples The Respondent requested a Continuance in order to remove the vehicles from his rental property. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the Respondent's Motion for a Continance until January 21, 2011. 7. Case #CENA 20100009705 — BCC vs. O'Neill Partners, LLC The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Jeff Letourneau. Property Maintenance Specialist Joseph Mucha was also present. The Respondent was represented by Joseph O'Neill, Managing Partner. Violations: Collier County Code Of Laws And Ordinances, Chapter 54, Article VI, Section 54 -181 Unauthorized accumulation of litter on the property. Folio No: 35745280008 Violation address: 2136 Sunshine Blvd, Naples Mr. O'Neill resides at 10881 Northwest 7`h Street, Plantation, Florida 33324. The initial Order was issued on October 15, 2010. The violation was abated on November 15, 2010. Fines have accrued at the rate of $50.00 per day for the period from October 23, 2010 through November 15, 2010 (24 days) for a total fine amount of $1,200.00. Previously assessed Operational Costs of $112.12 have been paid. The total amount due to date is $1,200.00. 12 IV 16 11 04 January 14, 2011 Mr. O'Neill stated the tenant renting the property caused the problem and refused to comply. The tenant has left the property and it has been completely cleaned. He requested to waive the fines. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Request for Imposition of Fines, but reduced the total amount due to $400.00. MOTIONS: B. Motion for Re- Hearing: 1. Case #CES_D_20090000340 — BCC vs. John M. Mueller, Jr. & Elizabeth Mueller Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Jonathan Musse requested the Hearing and was present. Investigative Supervisor Jeff Letourneau was also present. Respondent, John M. Mueller, Jr., was present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws, Chapter 22, Buildings and Building Regulations, Article II, Florida Building Code, Adoption and Amendment of The Florida Building Code, Section 22- 26(b)(104.5.1.4.4). Fence Permit #2006120659 - issued on 12 -7 -06, expired 6 -5 -07. No final inspection made. No certificate of completion issued. Folio No: 66480400002 Violation address: 834 Bentwood Drive, Naples The Respondents reside at 834 Bentwood Drive, Naples, Florida 34108. Supervisor Letourneau stated the County requested the Hearing in order to introduce evidence that was not presented during the first Hearing that will prove there is a serious Health and Safety violation on the property. The Special Magistrate inquired why the information was not presented at the initial Hearing since it was not newly discovered? The Supervisor was unable to answer the question. The Respondent stated he did not attend the initial Hearing because he was out of State and did not return to the area until the first week in November. The Hearing was held on October 15`h. He retrieved the Certified Mail on November 6h. The Special Magistrate explained the Ordinance required that the Respondent is to be duly notified by Certified Mail and the County had complied. The Respondent objected to the introduction of evidence since it was not part of the initial Hearing. 13 16 1 1 8 January 14, 2011 Supervisor Letourneau offered background information: there was a question as to whether the Permit had been issued correctly. Code Enforcement was requiring an inspection of the fence surrounding the pool and a Certificate of Completion to ensure there were no Health or Safety issues. The Special Magistrate cited from the Minutes of the October 15, 2010 Hearing: "He (the Investigator) stated Permit #2006120659 was issued on December 7, 2006 for a pool fence but expired on June 5, 2007. The Building Inspector failed the Final Inspection because the fence did not completely surround the pool. The Investigator noted the fence layout was originally approved by the County when the Permit application was submitted The Special Magistrate questioned how the County could approve the application and then find the fence was in violation when it complied with the issued Permit. " The Special Magistrate asked why Code Enforcement did not know this at the time? Supervisor Letourneau stated Code Enforcement was aware that the Permit was possibly issued in error but there is an LDC Ordinance stating that whether or not a Permit was issued in error, the owner still is required to obtain an inspection and Certificate of Completion. The Special Magistrate stated her Ruling was based on the fact that the Respondent was in compliance with what the County had given him to do and it was the County's mistake if the Permit should not have been issued. Supervisor Letourneau stated when the Inspector went to the site, he could not issue a Final Inspection because the fence did not comply with The Florida Building Code and he rejected the Permit at that time. The property owner did not follow through to correct the problem with the fence and the Permit expired. The Respondent stated the fence is in compliance with the Permit. Supervisor Letourneau stated the Building Inspector found that the fence was not in compliance with The Florida Building Code. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for a Re- Hearing. The Special Magistrate asked the Respondent if he was prepared to go forward with a new trial and he responded affirmatively. Re- Hearing: Supervisor Letourneau stated he would introduce three Exhibits as follows: • County's "A" — a copy of the applicable portion of the Ordinance 14 16 1 1B 1 ` January 14, 2011 • County's "B" — the Permit inspection history • County's "C" — the applicable portion of The Florida Building Code The Respondent objected to the introduction of County's "C." The Special Magistrate explained the documents were public records and she would take judicial notice of them. Supervisor Letourneau introduced the following documents which were marked as follows and admitted into evidence: • Exhibit "A" — one photograph taken on March 9, 2009 by Investigator Athey • Exhibit "B" — one photograph taken February 11, 2010 by Investigator Musse • Exhibit "C" — printout of Inspection History • Exhibit "D" — copy of the pertinent section of the Land Development Code which stated that even if a Permit was issued in error, the property owner was required to comply with requirements • Exhibit "E" — copy of the pertinent section of The Florida Building Coce Fence Permit 42006120659 for a four -foot aluminum swimming pool fence had been pulled by Tri- County Fence (Contractor) and was issued on December 7, 2006. The Permit expired on June 5, 2007. There was no Final Inspection or Certificate of Completion issued. Investigator Musse met with the Respondent in 2010 and explained that he was required to re -apply for a Permit and obtain all necessary inspections in order to obtain a Certificate of Completion. The County agreed to waive the fees for the Permit re- application. The Respondent informed the Investigator that he would not remove the hedges in order to complete the fence. The Inspection History stated that the "... pool fence must completely surround pool ... cannot use hedges as a pool barrier" as the reason why the Final Inspection failed. The Respondent had until June 5, 2007 to complete the fence and pass the Final Inspection. The Supervisor cited The Florida Building Code, Section 424.2.17.1.2, "Outdoor Swimming Pools," as follows: "... the barrier may not have any gaps, openings, indentations, protrusions or structural components that could allow a young child to crawl under, squeeze through, or climb over the barrier as herein described... " The Building Inspector failed the Final Inspection because a child could squeeze through the hedge which is a possible safety issue. He also cited the Land Development Code, Section 10.02.06 (13)(1)(c)(ii), as follows: "A Building or Land Alteration Permit issued in error shall not confer any rights or privileges to the applicant to proceed 15 16 1 1 $1 i January 14, 2011 or continue with construction and the County shall have the power to revoke such Permit until said error is corrected " The Special Magistrate asked when the County revoked the Permit and corrected the error. The Supervisor stated the Permit expired. The Respondent introduced one photograph (taken last year) which was marked as Respondent's Exhibit " #1" and admitted into evidence. The Respondent questioned to the term: "serious Health and Safety issues." He stated the hedge is completely filled in and there are no gaps. The Special Magistrate stated the Ordinance cites the barrier cannot be removeable without the aid of tools or allow passage of a 4 -inch diameter sphere." Investigator Musse stated while the hedge is well protected, hedges can wither away and die which would become a Health and Safety issue. The Special Magistrate stated the issue is a serious safety issue. The Respondent stated the hedges are denser, wider, and taller than the fence. He reiterated there are no gaps in the hedges. He further stated the permit was issued to the builder, not to him. The Special Magistrate found the Respondent was in violation, the provision in the Land Development Code applies, and the error in the Permit will not be allowed to .stand. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to obtain a Collier County Building Permit for the fence /pool barrier, all required inspection, and a Certificate of Completion on or before February 14, 2011, or a fine of $100.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondents are to notify the Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the Respondents have not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by Contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the Respondents. If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the cases for $112.47 per case on or before February 14, 2011. Total Amount Due: $112.47 16 161 1 01 474 January 14, 2011 The Respondent claimed the Permit that was issued was properly "met." Further, the original Permit was issued to Tri -State which should be made to obtain a new Permit and correct the situation. Investigator Musse stated it was the Contractor's obligation to make the correction but Tri -State was no longer in business. Supervisor Letourneau stated the owner has the ultimate responsibility to correct the violation. The Special Magistrate stated because there is not an immediate Health/Safetyl Welfare issue, she extended the deadline to comply with the provisions of the Order to 90 days, orApril 14, 2011. The County did not object to the deadline extension. The Special Magistrate explained if the Respondent needs additional time, he must contact Code Enforcement for an extension of time. She also informed the Respondent he is entitled to appeal her decision within thrity days from the date of the Hearing. He is responsible to obtain a copy of the transcript from Minutes and Records on the 4`h Floor. 17. Case #CEPM 20100017761— BCC vs. Henry J. Tesno and Jill J. Weaver Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Azure Sorrels requested the Hearing and as present. The Respondents were not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22, Article VI, Section 22- 231(15). Repeat Violation: single family swimming pool filled with green algae /stagnant water. Folio No: 71800000527 Violation address: 3117 Areca Avenue, Naples, FL 34112 The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 22, 2010. Investigator Sorrels introduced three photographs, taken on August 13, 2010, which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and two photographs, taken on January 13, 2011, which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "B" and admitted into evidence. She stated the violation has not been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to either: (1) Chemically treat the pool water to kill the algae and provide bi- weekly treatments to maintain clean pool water on or before January 19, 2011 or a fine of $500.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, 17 161 1 B1 1 January 14, 2011 unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate, -OR- (2) Chemically treat the pool water and cover the pool to prevent the intrusion of rain water, pursuant to HUD standards, on or before January 19, 2011 or a fine of $500.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondents are to notes Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the Respondents have not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the property owners. If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case for $112.64 on or before February 14, 2011. Total Amount Due: $112.64 16. Case #CESD 20100003073 — BCC vs. Eduardo Gonzales Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Renald Paul requested the Hearing and was present. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Section 10.02.06(B)(1)(a) Unpermitted shed. Unpermitted garage partition walls. Folio No: 36113960001 Violation address: 2140 48th Street SW, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and Courthouse on December 20, 2010. Investigator Paul introducted four photographs taken by the Foreclosure Team which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTYof the alleged violations and ordered to obtain all applicable Collier County Permits for either the additions to the property or the demolition of the additions, all required inspections, and a Certificate of Occupancy /Completion on or before February 14, 2011, or a fine of $100.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent is to notify the Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. 18 16 1 1811 Janulry 14, 2011 If the Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by Contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the Respondent. If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriff's Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case for $112.47 on or before February 14, 2011. Total Amount Due: $112.47 RECESS: 2:30 PM RECONVENED 2:36 PM 22. Case #CEPM 20100017929 — BCC vs. Allan Perdomo Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Renald Paul requested the Hearing and was present. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances Chapter 22, Article VI, Section 22- 231(12)(L) Screen in the lanai is torn, needs to be repaired. Folio No: 36123040005 Violation address: 1990 50`h Street SW, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 23, 2010. Investigator Paul introducted one photograph, taken on September 2, 2010, which was marked as County's Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violations and ordered to repair the torn screens on or before January 21, 2011, or a fine of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent is to notes the Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by Contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the Respondent. If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case for $112.56 on or before February 14, 2011. Total Amount Due: $112.56 IC 1611 81 January 14, 2011 The Investigator noted a Permit is not required for screen repairs. 11. Case #CESD 20100019166 — BCC vs. Tereso Bautista and Emiliana Lopez Vasquez Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joseph Mucha requested the Hearing and was present. The Respondents were not present. Violations: Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Section 4.06.01(D)(1) Planted vegetation on the southeast corner of the property is obstructing sight lines for oncoming traffic at the intersection of 40`h Terrace SW and 201h Place SW. Folio No: 35776360007 Violation address: 4007 201h Place SW, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 20, 2010 Investigator Mucha introduced four photographs, taken on September 30, 2010, which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A," and a diagram which was marked as County's Exhibit `B" and bother were admitted into evidence. The violation has not been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violations and ordered to remove the excess material as required to assure adequate sight lines to maintain visibility at the intersection of 40`h Terrace SW and 20`h Place SW on or before January 21, 2011, or a fine of $100.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondents are to notes the Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the Respondents have not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by Contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the Respondents. If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case for $112.29 on or before February 14, 2011. Total Amount Due: $112.29 20 1 b 1 1 B 1 January 14, 2011 13. Case #CESD 20100020024 — BCC vs. Tatiana Tannehill Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joseph Mucha requested the Hearing and was present. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Section 10.02.06(B)(1)(a) Unpermitted wood canopy with concrete block structure ( "shrine ") in the rear yard. Folio No: 35740720000 Violation address: 212141 " Terrace SW, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 20, 2010, Invetigator Mucha introduced to photographs, taken on October 20, 2010, which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. He stated he has b een unable to contact the owner and the violation has not been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violations and ordered to hire a licensed General Contractor to obtain all applicable Collier County Permits for either the structure or the demolition of the structure, all required inspections, and a Certificate of Occupancy /Completion on or before February 14, 2011, or a fine of $200.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent is to notify the Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by Contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the Respondent. If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case for $112.20 on or before February 14, 2011. Total Amount Due: $112.20 21. Case #CEPM 20100020893 —BCC _ vs. Reuben Reinstein Estate c/o Laird Lile, Personal Representative Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joseph Mucha requested the Hearing and was present. The Respondent was not present. 21 1 6 I 1® January 14, 2011 Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22, Article VI, Section 22- 231(15) Swimming pool that is not being maintained. Folio No: 36613600007 Violation address: 4460 P Avenue SW, Naples The Special Magistrate instructed Code Enforcement to remove the Personal Representative's name from the case since he is not the Respondent and stated Mr. Lile is to received notification of her Order. The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 20, 2010. Investigator Mucha introduced one photograph of the pool, taken on November 15, 2010, which was marked as County's Exhibit "A" and admitted into evidence. He stated the violation has not been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to either: (1) Chemically treat the pool water to kill the algae and provide bi- weekly treatments to maintain clean pool water on or before January 21, 2011 or a fine of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate, -OR- (2) Chemically treat the pool water and cover the pool to prevent the intrusion of rain water, pursuant to HUD standards, on or before January 21, 2011 or a fine of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent is to notes Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the property owners. If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case for $112.56 on or before February 14, 2011. Total Amount Due: $112.56 12. Case #CEPM 20100017789 — BCC vs. Elvis Camacho Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Heinz Box requested the Hearing and was present. The Respondent was not present. 22 16 I 1 B 1 ti January 14, 2011 Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22 - Buildings and Building Regulations, Article VI - Property Maintenance Code, Section 22- 231(15) Unmaintained pool at this location. Folio No: 38100840006 Violation address: 2725 701h Street SW, Naples, FL 34105 The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 20, 2010. Investigator Box introduced two photographs of the pool, taken on September 1, 2010, which were marked as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and one photograph of the structure taken on January 13, 2011, which was marked as County's Exhibit `B." The Exhibits were admitted into evidence. He stated the property is part of an ongoing arson investigation and the violation has not been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to either: (1) Chemically treat the pool water to kill the algae and provide bi- weekly treatments to maintain clean pool water on or before January 21, 2011 or a fine of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate, -OR- (2) Chemically treat the pool water and cover the pool to prevent the intrusion of rain water, pursuant to HUD standards, on or before January 21, 2011 or a ftne of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondent is to notify Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the Respondent has not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the property owners. If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case for $112.56 on or before February 14, 2011. Total Amount Due: $112.56 15. Case #CEPM 20100019812 — BCC vs. Betty Frederick and Karen L. Donnadio Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Carmelo Gomez requested the Hearing and was present. The Respondents were not present. 23 161161 January 14, 2011 Violations: Collier County Code Of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22 - Buildings and Building Regulations, Article VI - Property Maintenance Code, Section 22- 231(15) Green Pool. Folio No: 36001560005 Violation address: 2975 45`h Street SW, Naples, FL 34116 The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 20, 2010. Investigator Gomez introduced two photographs, taken on October 16, 2010, and on January 13, 2011. The photographs were marked, respectively, as County's Exhibits "A" and `B" and admitted into evidence. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to either: (1) Chemically treat the pool water to kill the algae and provide bi- weekly treatments to maintain clean pool water on or before January 21, 2011 or a fine of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate, -OR- (2) Chemically treat the pool water and cover the pool to prevent the intrusion of rain water, pursuant to HUD standards, on or before January 21, 2011 or a fine of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondents are to notify Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the Respondents haves not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the property owners. If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case for $112.29 on or before February 14, 2011. TotalAmountDue: $112.29 20. Case #CEPM 20100019821— BCC vs. Irene Castillo and Benito Abraham Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator James Kincaid requested the Hearing and was present. The Respondents were not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22 - Building and Building Regulations, Article VI - Property Maintenance Code, Section 22- 231(19) Large bee hive on residential property. 24 16 1 1 qjary`14, 2011 Folio No: 62091480004 Violation address: 5229 Martin Street, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 29, 2010. Investigator Kincaid introduced two photographs, taken on October 19, 2010 and on January 13, 2011. The photographs were marked, respectively, as County's Exhibits "A" and "B" and admitted into evidence. He stated the property is vacant and is not in foreclosure. He noted the violation has not been abated. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondents were found GUILTY of the alleged violations and ordered to remove the bees and the hives from the property on or before January 21, 2011, or a fine of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Magistrate. The Respondents are to notify the Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the Investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. If the Respondents have not complied by the deadline, the County is authorized to abate the violation by Contractor bid -out and assess the costs to the Respondents. If necessary, assistance may be requested from the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of the Order. The Respondents were ordered to pay the Operational Costs incurred by Code Enforcement during the prosecution of the case for $11238 on or before February 14, 2011. Total Amount Due: $112.38 C. Emergency Cases: None VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Motion for Imposition of Fines: 1. Case #CESD 20090011040 — BCC vs. Peter V. Schrvver The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Reggie Smith. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Florida Building Code, 2007 Edition, Chapter 1 Permits, Section 105.1 and Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Section 10.02.06 (13)(1)(a) Unpermitted shed on property. Folio No: 63100480004 Violation address: 4851 Catalina Dr, Naples 25 161 l B 1 January 14, 2011 The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on January 4, 2011. Investigator Smith stated the initial Order was issued on October 15, 2010. He noted the violation has not been abated. Fines have accrued at the rate of $100.00 per day for the period from November 16, 2010 through January 14, 2011 (60 days) for a total fine amount of $6,000.00. Previously assessed Operational Costs of $112.29 have not been paid. The total amount due to date is $6,112.29. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for Imposition of Fines in the total amount of $6,112.29 and noted fines will continue to accrue. 2. Case #CEV 20100006169 — BCC vs. Katherine Sheffield The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigator Christopher Ambach. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Section 2.01.00(A) Several unlicensed and inoperable vehicles and trailers on the property. Folio No: 36814240004 Violation address: 660 29`h Street SW, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on January 4, 2011. Investigator Ambach stated the initial Order was issued on December 3, 2010. He noted the violation has not been abated. Fines have accrued at the rate of $50.00 per day for the period from December 7, 2010 through January 14, 2011 (39 days) for a total fine amount of $1,950.00. Previously assessed Operational Costs of $112.20 have not been paid. The total amount due to date is $2,062.20. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for Imposition of Fines in the total amount of $2,062.20 and noted fines will continue to accrue. 1. L.AJC RI. L'LV GVIVVVVVGGI-DL, 1. VS.. The County was represented by Investigator Ed Morad. The Respondent was not present. 26 Snow on behalf of Investigator 16 11 1u 1 1,04 January 14, 2011 Violations: Collier County Land Development Code 04 -41, as amended, Section 1.04.01(A) A Fleetwood "Pioneer" travel trailer with expired license plate parked /stored on improved, abandoned property, in a residential zoned district. Folio No: 25631200005 Violation address: 216 4`h Street, Immokalee The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 30, 2010. Investigator Snow stated the initial Order was issued on December 3, 2010. He noted the violation was abated on January 4, 2011. Fines have accrued at the rate of $1 00.00 per day for the period from December 7, 2010 through January 4, 2011 (29 days) for a total fine amount of $2,900.00. Previously assessed Operational Costs of $112.29 have not been paid. The total amount due to date is $3,012.29. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for Imposition of Fines in the total amount of $3,012.29. 8. Case #CESD 20100004782 — BCC vs. Dusan Petrie The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Jeff Letourneau on behalf of Investigator Carmelo Gomez. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Florida Building Code, 2007 Edition, Chapter 1 Permits, Section 105.1 Shed - no permits. Folio No: 36459080001 Violation address: 3122 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 20, 2010. Supervisor Letourneau stated the initial Order was issued on October 15, 2010. He noted the violation has not been abated. Fines have accrued at the rate of $100.00 per day for the period from November 16, 2010 through January 14, 2011 (60 days) for a total fine amount of $6,000.00. Previously assessed Operational Costs of $112.20 have not been paid. The total amount due to date is $6,112.20. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for Imposition of Fines in the total amount of $6,112.20 and noted fines continue to accrue. 27 VII. 161 1 81 January 14, 2011 11. Case #CEPM 20090017229— BCC vs. Palm Lake LLC The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Jeff Letourneau on behalf of Property Maintenance Specialist Joseph Mucha. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22, Article VI, Section 22 -231 Subsections 4, 8, 9, 12i, 12k, 12o, 12p, 19, and 20. Mobile home being used for rental purposes that is maintained in poor condition. Folio No: 61842240009 Violation address: 3131 Tamiami Trail, #3, Naples The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 21, 2010. Supervisor Letourneau stated the initial Order was issued on March 5, 2010. The Respondent was granted an Extension of Time to Comply on June 4, 2010. An additional Extension of Time was granted on October 15, 2010. The violation has not been abated. Fines have accrued at the rate of $250.00 per day for the period from December 16, 2010 through January 14, 2011 (30 days) for a total fine amount of $7,500.00. Previously assessed Operational Costs of $112.91 have been paid. The total amount due to date is $7,500.00. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion for Imposition of Fines in the total amount of $7,500.00 and noted fines continue to accrue. OLD BUSINESS: A. Motion to Amend Previously Issued Orders: .-..�� +T�.r.. i.a �vv�vva�ooy — n�. ♦, vs. �eoree Lam Dert The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Cristina Perez on behalf of Investigator Carol Sykora Violations: Physical Safety - Pools. Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 22, Building and Building Regulations, Article II - The Florida Building Code, Section 22- 26(103.11.2) Private swimming pool without safety fence or enclosure. Folio No: 37987440002 Violation address: 3580 White Blvd, Naples Supervisor Jennifer Waldron Baker stated the County requested the Hearing to amend 28 161161 January 14,2011 the Imposition of Fines Order because the County incurred abatement costs and has updated the fines for inclusion in the Order. The Notice of Hearing was posted at the property and the Courthouse on December 29, 2010. Re: Part "B" of the Order, Fines have accrued at the rate of $200.00 per day for the period from October 20, 2009 through January 14, 2011 (452 days) for a total fine amount of $90,400.00. Re: Part "C" of the Order, Fines have accrued at the rate of $200.00 per day for the period from November 17, 2009 through January 14, 2011 (424 days) for a total fine amount of $84,800.00. The County incurred abatements costs in the amount of $1,304.80 Previously assessed Operational Costs of $117.70 have not been paid. The total amount due to date is $176,622.50. It was noted the County installed a HUD - standard cover on the pool to prevent a Health/Safety /Welfare issue. There has not been compliance because a permanent barrier has not been constructed around the pool and a Permit has not been obtained. Fines continue to accrue. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion to Amend the Previously Issued Order in the case. The total amount due is $176,622.50 and fines will continue to accrue. B. Motion to Rescind Previously Issued Orders: 1. Case #CEROW 20090015230 — BCC vs. Chase Home Finance LLC The County was represented by Code Enforcement Supervisor Jennifer Waldron Baker. The Respondent was not present. Violations: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 110, Article II, Section 110 -31 (a) Several trees that were planted in the right of way with no permit. Folio No: 36239560000 Violation address: 513320th Court SW, Naples The Supervisor stated the County was provided title indicating that Chase Home Finance was the owner but the title was never recorded and the Bank technically does not own it. The case will be brought back when the proper entity has been discovered. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion to RESCIND the Previously Issued Order in the case. 29 161181 A January 14, 2011 (Note: The following case was added to the Agenda.) 2. Case #CENA 20100018192 — BCC vs. Richard Wineholt The County was represented by Code Enforcement Supervisor Jennifer Waldron Baker. The Respondent was not present. The Supervisor stated the County requested that the Case be rescinded because it was a Nuisance Abatement Lien that was placed in error. The Special Magistrate GRANTED the County's Motion to RESCIND the Previously Issued Order in the case. VIII. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Request to Forward Cases to County Attorney's Office as referenced in the submitted Executive Summary. The Special Magistrate reviewed the cases cited in the Executive Summary and GRANTED the County's Request. B. Request for the Special Magistrate to Impose Nuisance Abatement Liens on Cases referenced in the submitted Executive Summary. The Special Magistrate reviewed the cases cited in the Executive Summary and GRANTED the County's Request. IX. REPORTS: None X. NEXT HEARING DATE: February 4, 2011 at 9:00 AM, at the Collier County Government Center, Administrative Building "F, "3rd Floor, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. There being no further business for the good of the County, the Hearing was adjourned by Order of the Special Magistrate at 3:34 PM. COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING `B_reg a Garretson, pedal Magistrate 30 1 6 1 1 0 1 =uary 14, 2011 The Minutes were�approved by the Special Magistrate on ebCL to as presented or as amended 31