Ex-parte - Solis 11/14/2017 Ex parte Items - Commissioner Andy Solis
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
November 14, 2017
CONSENT AGENDA
16.A.8. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are
required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the
minor final plat of Heritage Bay Commons - Tract D Second Replat,
Application Number 20170002126.
ix NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE Meetings I 'Correspondence I le-mails Calls
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Andy Solis
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
November 14, 2017
16.A.9. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are
required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the
minor final plat of Buckley Parcel Replat, Application Number
PL20170003099.
pQ NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ❑Meetings ❑Correspondence ❑e-mails flCalls
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Andy Solis
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
November 14, 2017
SUMMARY AGENDA
17.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are
required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance
amending Ordinance No. 14-24, as amended, the Buckley Mixed Use
Planned Unit Development (MPUD), to approve an insubstantial change
to the MPUD to reduce the minimum lot area and minimum lot width for
single family detached dwelling units, and providing for an effective date.
The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of the
intersection of Airport-Pulling Road and Orange Blossom Drive, in Section
2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, FL, consisting of
21.7± acres. [PDI-PL20170002630]
X NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ❑Meetings ❑Correspondence e-mails ❑Call
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Andy Solis
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
November 14, 2017
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are
required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a rezone from a
Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit
Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the
Cleary RPUD,to allow construction of a maximum of 63 residential dwelling
units or 200 group housing units for seniors on property located on the
south side of Immokalee Road, approximately one quarter mile east of
Logan Boulevard in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 26 East,
consisting of 8.99± acres. [PUDZ-PL20160001985]
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ®Meetings t:ICorrespondence ®e-mails ®Calls
MEETINGS: 11-3-17 with Rod Gustafson, Pat Howard, Bob Owens
11-10-17 with Patrick Neale, Michael Manganaro
11-13-17 with Rich Yovanovich, Mr. Cleary
LETTERS: 10-31-17 from Albert Jaskot
11-1-17 from Diane Jaskot
PHONE CALLS: 10-13-17 from Jerry Kelly
E-MAILS: many, see attached
GoodnerAngela
From: Mary Anne Guarino <maryanneguarino@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 11:28 AM
To: SolisAndy
Cc: GoodnerAngela
Subject: Cleary Project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Mr. Solis,
I am a Saturnia Lakes resident who would like to voice my objection to the Cleary Development plan as I
understand it to stand at this time.
I did attend the Planning Commission meeting of October 5th, where all of the Saturnia residents, except two,
one being our lawyer Patrick Neale, were shocked to hear that our HOA president had signed an agreement,
without holding a board meeting with the residents, with Cleary. This agreement was not in the best interest of
Saturnia Lakes residents.
Thee Cleary Project which will result in the construction of a five story building up to 50 feet tall on the
property that borders our entrance to Saturnia, only feet away from our main entrance and certain residential
streets in Saturnia Lakes. This project is scheduled to go before the Collier County Commissioners for a final
hearing on Tuesday,November 14th. Many Saturnia residents attended the October 5th planning commission
meeting on the Cleary project with a goal of persuading the commissioners not to endorse the project. In the
end, our efforts fell short by one vote for a tie. Both the chairman and the vice-chairman voted against this
project as it was presented by the developer.
I do not want to take up a lot of your time but there are several concerns we have concerning this project.
The proposed structure will be 50 feet tall with parking, dumpsters, generators, etc. almost in the backyard of
some Saturnia residents. Cleary stated that the tree lined Saturnia will block a lot of this view and noise, but it
will not. After Hurricane Irma, a good portion of the tree line is gone.
In addition to the height of this building, Saturnia has a concern about traffic since there will be an entrance and
exit only feet away from our entrance and exit. Since there is currently a U-turn option here on an already busy
street, Immokalee Road, and we are soon to have a shopping/restaurant mall just feet away from both entrances
on the corner of Logan and Immokalee,this situation has a potential for many accidents. In addition, we have
school buses twice a day entering and exiting our main entrance which could also cause traffic issues since the
two entrances will now be only feet apart form each other.
Another main concern is water drainage. During the last rainy season and Hurricane Irma, our lakes and
preserves were at capacity. I have no actual knowledge of water drainage issues, but I cannot imagine where all
the standing water will run once this large facility is built.
i
If you speak to most of Saturnia residents,they would tell you that one of the reasons they settled here was
because of the beautiful landscaping throughout the development, especially our entrance way, which will now
be lost forever. A 50 foot structure and parking lot in our backyards is not what we ever expected.
Thank you for your time,
Mary Anne Guarino
2072 Isla De Palma Circle
2
GoodnerAngela
From: karen@patrickneale.com on behalf of Karen Klukiewicz <karen@patrickneale.com>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 12:19 PM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Cc: pneale@patrickneale.com; mmanganaroatsaturnia@gmail.com
Subject: Registered: Letter from Saturnia Lakes HOA Board - Agenda Item 9.a. for 11/14/2017
Meeting
Attachments: Board Letter to BCC.pdf
REGISTERED EMAIL ®Mail
CERTIFIED DELIVERY, CONTENT & TIME
This is a Registered Email' message from Karen Klukiewicz.
Please see and review attached letter sent on behalf of the Saturnia Lakes Homeowners Association Board regarding the
Cleary PUD—Petition PL 20160001985.
This is agenda item for Tuesdays BCC meeting.
Best regards,
Karen Klukiewicz
Chief of Operations
Assistant to Attorney Patrick H. Neale
Patrick Neale&Associates
Phone: 239-642-1485
Fax: 239-642-1487
Email: karenpatrickneale.com
Email Servicing: email-servicepatrickneale.com
www.patrickneale.com
Principal Office
5470 Bryson Court, Suite 103
Naples, FL 34109
Marco Island Office
950 North Collier Blvd.
Marco Island, FL 34145
Mailing Address
P. 0. Box 9440
Naples, FL 34101-9440
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s)or entity(s)named within the message.This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential
information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product
privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party,that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-
client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient,you are hereby
notified that any review, dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please
notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-
client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230:Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm,
cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties,and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
1
November 7, 2017
Board of County Commissioners
Collier County, Florida
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 301
Naples, FL
RE: Cleary PUD—Petition PL20160001985
Dear Commissioners:
I am writing this in my capacity as the president of the Saturnia Lakes Homeowners'
Association, Inc. (hereafter Association) The Saturnia Lakes development is directly
adjacent to the proposed development referenced above. Therefore, the quality and impact
of the proposed development is of great concern to our members. The Board of Directors of
the Association has carefully considered the above petition at several meetings which were
properly noticed to the membership of the Association.
Our counsel, Patrick Neale, has communicated with counsel for the developer, Richard
Yovanovich. The developer and the Association, as represented by its Board of Directors,
have reached agreement on certain conditions for the proposed development. There remains
one development standard proposed by the developer upon which the Association and
developer cannot agree. The position of the Association as set out herein was unanimously
approved by the Board of Directors of the Association at a telephonic board meeting on
October 27, 2017 called for the purpose of considering the impact of this petition.
The development standards upon which the developer and Association have reached
agreement are:
1. Height: Three stories maximum with height not to exceed 37 foot zoned height, 45
foot maximum height, as defined in LDC 1.08.02.. Three stories to include parking, so if
there is parking under the building there will be a maximum of two stories of construction
above parking.
2. Floor Area Ratio: 0.50 maximum.
3. Setback—30 feet on east side of Cleary PUD adjoining Saturnia Lakes, no parking
or accessory structures in setback.
4. Construction standards as set out in CCPC recommendations.
a. Concrete Masonry Unit construction and stucco, or approved equivalent
b. Cement or slate tile roof or approved equivalent
c. Minimum 9 Foot ceiling heights with first floor units
d. Concrete pavers at entrance/exit.
e. Gated Entry
5. Enhanced buffering on east side adjacent to Saturnia Lakes maximizing use of
mature vegetation and trees in place and enhanced with additional vegetation and trees to
improve opacity.
The Association cannot and does not support the residential density requested by the
developer of seven (7) units per acre. That density is incompatible and inconsistent with the
Saturnia Lakes density of slightly over three (3) units per acre. The Association could
support a density of five (5) units per acre.
We appreciate the diligent efforts of County staff and the Planning Commission in this
matter. It is the Association's request that the Board of County Commissioners consider the
position of the Saturnia Lakes Homeowners'Association in their evaluation of this petition
Sincerely
Michael Manganaro
President
GoodnerAngela
From: JOHN HART <kkh,jjh@me.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 10:25 AM
To: SolisAndy
Subject: Cleary PUD
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Our opposition to the development of the ClearyProperty on Immokalee Road is in the proposed height of 50 feet which
will tower over all our surrounding homes in the Saturnia Lakes community. The planned preserve buffer has been
demolished by Hurricane Irma. The building will be out of place as there aren't any buildings of that height east of 175 all
the way to 951 and beyond (except church steeples). The proposed new shopping center at the corner of Immokalee
Road and Logan Blvd. will not be near 50 feet high. It also opens up the idea of another builder putting a similar
structure on the adjoining Walker property. We all know that the Cleary property will be developed but we strongly
disagree as to the height and it will run the length of our whole entrance roadway. It should blend in with all the
surrounding homes in the Saturnia Lakes and Old Cypress corridor. Please hear our appeal and deny the 50 foot building
that will completely change our beautiful community.
Kay and John Hart
2330 Butterfly Palm Drive
Naples, FL 34119
3
GoodnerAngela
From: Patricia Howard <pdhoward83@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 3:01 PM
To: SolisAndy
Subject: Clear Deveopment
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Commissioner Solis
I want to thank you for agreeing to meet with a small group of Saturnia Lakes residents so that we can voice the
concerns we have with the proposed Cleary Development. I have attached a list that outlines the issues which are most
troubling for our community.We look forward to meeting with you tomorrow at 2:30pm.
Sincerely
Cleary Development
Pat Howard
4
GoodnerAngela
From: rick carabajal <rickcarabajal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 5:09 PM
To: SolisAndy
Subject: Re: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the opportunity to meet you. Looking forward to seeing you on Friday at 2:30
pm November 3rd. I'll email you specific points of concern as well as additional information
which should be helpful in the decision making process. Is it okay that I ask Pat Howard,
Rod Gustafson and Gerald Kelly to also attend the meeting as each can articulate specific
concerns?
Looking forward to meeting you on Friday November 3rd 2:30 p.m.
Rick
From: SolisAndy <AndySolis@colliergov.net>
To: rick carabajal <rickcarabajal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 5:00 PM
Subject: RE: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Hello, Rick:
Is your group available at 2:30 this Friday afternoon? Let me know, and if so, send me the names of
all who will be attending. If you have any written materials, the Commissioner prefers to have them in
advance, so that you can discuss them together. Brief directions and a link to a map of the county
complex is below. I look forward to hearing from you.
The Board of County Commissioners offices are located in the Government Complex at 3299
Tamiami Trail East, at the corner of Airport and the East Trail. (HERE is a link to a map of the
complex. If you're coming from the North or West, use the entrance off Airport and drive through the
complex; if you're coming from the South/East, the entrance from the East Trail is the easiest.) The
easiest thing to do is use Parking Garage #2. Our offices are in Building F. You'll pass through a
metal detector at the entrance to the building, and they'll direct you from there.
Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator
Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq.
Collier County District 2
Phone: 239.252.8602
Fax: 239.252.6947
Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE!
From: rick carabajal [mailto:rickcarabajal@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 8:36 AM
To: SolisAndy <AndySolis@colliergov.net>
Subject: Re: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
1
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the response, I'm wondering if you might have 15-30 minutes sometime before the
November hearing where we might have a chance to personally meet and discuss 5 specific
concerns regarding the Cleary PUD development to be voted on at the November hearing. After
canvasing the surrounding areas including various community developments in and around
lmmokalee Road and Logan Avenue, the immediate area which could be directly affected by their
development. This is also in addition to the commercial development taking palace in the immediate
area by GL Homes.
GL Homes took a different approach and met with its potential new neighbors, were sensitive to
neighbors needs and concerns and the long term effects that would result to the developed area. GL
Homes made sure all issues were considered and agreed upon as opposed to the Cleary PUD
approach, maximizing profit dollars on a development without respect to the environmental, safety,
zoning, consideration of existing neighbors and the consistency of what is and will be built in the
future to maintain a safe consistent community landscape.
I'm not convinced the Cleary PUD development proposal is in the immediate communities or Collier
County's best interest if it is to proceed with as planned and would like to share my concerns along
with three other individuals who have also done extensive research on the proposal with you if
possible.
Please let me know what your schedule permits, I'll try calling you this afternoon if I don"t hear back
from the email. I look forward to hearing from you. I appreciate your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Rick Carabajal
From: SolisAndy <AndySolis@colliergov.net>
To: rick carabajal <rickcarabajal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Hello, Mr. Carabajal:
Thank you for your email detailing your concerns regarding the proposed Cleary development. Call
me when you're ready to schedule a meeting, and we'll see when we can get it set up.
Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by
Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator
Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq.
Collier County District 2
Phone: 239.252.8602
Fax: 239.252.6947
2
Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE!
From: rick carabajal [mailto:rickcarabajal(c�yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 10:52 AM
To: SolisAndy <AndySolis(a colliergov.net>
Subject: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Dear Andy,
My name is Rick Carabajal I live at 1599 Triangle Palm Ter. Naples FL 34119.
I am opposed to the Cleary PUD Proposed Development on Immokalee Road just east of Logan Ave.
There are numerous issues and concerns including:
Environmental, safety, traffic, and rezoning are a few issues as to why I'm opposed to the
development along with the nonconformance and misrepresentation as to what would be and what
was proposed to the County Commissioners.
I will follow up with a phone call to you in several days in an attempt to set up a meeting were myself
and four other individuals, who have spoken to over 300 residents in the immediate area with similar
concerns. We hope to have the opportunity to meet with you to discuss this proposal before you
announce a formal position on this issue.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Rick Carabajal
1599 Triangle Plam Ter
Naples, FL 34119
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
3
GoodnerAngela
From: rick carabajal <rickcarabajal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 8:36 AM
To: SolisAndy
Subject: Re: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the response, I'm wondering if you might have 15-30 minutes sometime before
the November hearing where we might have a chance to personally meet and discuss 5
specific concerns regarding the Cleary PUD development to be voted on at the November
hearing. After canvasing the surrounding areas including various community developments
in and around Immokalee Road and Logan Avenue, the immediate area which could be
directly affected by their development. This is also in addition to the commercial
development taking palace in the immediate area by GL Homes.
GL Homes took a different approach and met with its potential new neighbors, were
sensitive to neighbors needs and concerns and the long term effects that would result to
the developed area. GL Homes made sure all issues were considered and agreed upon as
opposed to the Cleary PUD approach, maximizing profit dollars on a development without
respect to the environmental, safety, zoning, consideration of existing neighbors and the
consistency of what is and will be built in the future to maintain a safe consistent
community landscape.
I'm not convinced the Cleary PUD development proposal is in the immediate communities
or Collier County's best interest if it is to proceed with as planned and would like to share
my concerns along with three other individuals who have also done extensive research on
the proposal with you if possible.
Please let me know what your schedule permits, I'll try calling you this afternoon if I don"t
hear back from the email. I look forward to hearing from you. I appreciate your attention to
this important matter.
Sincerely,
Rick Carabajal
From: SolisAndy <AndySolis@colliergov.net>
To: rick carabajal <rickcarabajal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Hello, Mr. Carabajal:
1
Thank you for your email detailing your concerns regarding the proposed Cleary development. Call
me when you're ready to schedule a meeting, and we'll see when we can get it set up.
Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by
Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator
Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq.
Collier County District 2
Phone: 239.252.8602
Fax: 239.252.6947
Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE!
From: rick carabajal [mailto:rickcarabajal@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 10:52 AM
To: SolisAndy <AndySolis@colliergov.net>
Subject: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Dear Andy,
My name is Rick Carabajal I live at 1599 Triangle Palm Ter. Naples FL 34119.
I am opposed to the Cleary PUD Proposed Development on Immokalee Road just east of Logan Ave.
There are numerous issues and concerns including:
Environmental, safety, traffic, and rezoning are a few issues as to why I'm opposed to the
development along with the nonconformance and misrepresentation as to what would be and what
was proposed to the County Commissioners.
I will follow up with a phone call to you in several days in an attempt to set up a meeting were myself
and four other individuals, who have spoken to over 300 residents in the immediate area with similar
concerns. We hope to have the opportunity to meet with you to discuss this proposal before you
announce a formal position on this issue.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Rick Carabajal
1599 Triangle Plam Ter
Naples, FL 34119
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
2
GoodnerAngela
From: KATHY MILLER <cjmsmom@comcast.net>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 4:29 PM
To: SolisAndy
Subject: Cleary property
I'm sure that you have heard from many residents of Saturnia Lakes regarding the Clearly development and there are
many concerns. My main concern is being able to safely enter and exit the property. We have been told that traffic is
not a problem and a traffic signal cannot be installed at the Logan exit. It is already difficult to make a left turn onto
Logan Blvd. during rush hour and once the shopping center is built on the corner of Immokalee and Logan, we know that
will make it worse. When the Cleary development is built,there will be easily a couple of hundred more vehicles to
navigate the roads. I assume that the majority of the residents there would exit onto Immokalee and make a u-turn the
majority of the time to head west and with the volume of traffic,there is no safe way to do that.
Please put yourself in our position and think about how this will jeopardize our safety. We realize that something will be
built on this property, but could it be something that would create less hazardous conditions?
Thank you for your consideration.
Kathy Miller
2430 Butterfly Palm Drive
1
GoodnerAngela
From: David Opland <martiandust@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 1:39 PM
To: SolisAndy
Subject: Objections to Cleary PUD
Attachments: Letter to Andy Solis Board of County Commissioners 20170128.pdf; ATT00001.htm
Commissioner Solis,
We are asking you to support modifications to the Cleary PUD to ensure the development is consistent with existing
nearby residential communities with reasonable density, building height, and setback restrictions. Planning
Commissioner Chair Mark Strain and Secretary Diane Ebert objected to the Cleary PUD for reasons noted in our attached
letter to you. Please consider their concerns,which mirror our objections, and bring about needed changes to the Cleary
PUD.
We agree the land owner has the right to develop this property.The Clearly Development Group has regulatory approval
for a single-family residential development, which we would welcome. Unfortunately,they have the chosen the
development option having the most undesirable neighborhood effects.
Many people in our Saturnia Lakes community share these same concerns and object to the Cleary PUD. Please help us.
Respectfully,
David and Mary Opland
martiandust@gmail.com
GoodnerAngela
From: David Marin <dwmarin@optonline.net>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 9:15 AM
To: SaundersBurt
Cc: FialaDonna; SolisAndy;TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Opposition to Cleary CFPUD PL20160001985
Attachments: Naples Assisted Living Bldgs.pdf;ATT00001.htm
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
October 26, 2017
Mr. Burt Saunders
Collier County Commissioner, District 3
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
Dear Mr. Saunders,
I'm writing as a resident of Saturnia Lakes to oppose the planned size and scope of Planning Project
Application Number: PL20160001985 "Cleary PUD". This proposed project is being presented at your
November 14th meeting.
Below I've summarized my arguments:
Proposed Height of 50 Feet for 200 unit building
The proposed height of this development is not in keeping in character with the local community, as it will be,
at 50 feet, the tallest building on Immokalee east of 175. In the 8/24/16 "Pre-Application Meeting Notes" #1
handwritten note says- "Address compliance with FLUE designation; FLUE policy 5.4 ("requires new land uses
to be compatible with surrounding area'); FLUE objective 7 ("adhere to the existing development character of
Collier County"and its applicable supporting policies"(such as developments provide "a range of housing
prices and types"))
Cleary argues that the Saturnia Lakes (Regis PUD) community is already zoned for 50 feet, so Cleary
requesting 50 feet is in line with FLUE 5.4. However, although zoned for 50 feet, Saturnia is only built up to a
maximum of single family 2 story homes (guestimate 30 feet). This became a "semantics" discussion at the
10/5 planning board meeting - should Cleary be compared to the zoned height or actual height of Saturnia
Lakes? The County's Planning Zoning Director, Mike Bosi, stated that this rule was open to interpretation by
the board. Saturnia asks the BCC to compare Cleary to the "comparable" existing height (and "community
character") of Saturnia and not the zoned height. (Commissioner Mark Strain agreed it should be comparable
height.)
No similar sized (130-200 beds) Collier County Assisted Living/Retirement facility is as close to a
residential community as Cleary will abut Saturnia Lakes
Using the Agency for Healthcare Administration's Assisted Living Directory for Collier County I compared the
largest ALRs (130-200 beds) to their proximity to local residential communities. Unlike Cleary's proximity to
1
Saturnia Lakes, ALL are a significant distance away from other communities as indicated by satellite photos
using Google Maps.
See attached PowerPoint PDF document
Cleary is a "Quasi-Commercial" Development
Cleary is asking the board to jump several steps from currently zoned Agricultural to "Quasi Commercial".
In Principal Planner, Growth Management Department's Nancy Gundlach's 8/2/17 "third review of the Cleary
PUD" rezone letter to Wayne Arnold (Grady Minor &Associates) and Richard Yovanovich (Coleman,
Yovanovich and Koester, P.A.) she states "This PUD contains quasi commercial uses (ALF and CCRC) and
residential uses. Therefore, it is a CFPUD, not a RPUD"
I ask the BCC to draw a line in the sand and not allow for such a tall "quasi commercial" structure to set a
precedent in our immediate community.
63 townhomes have never been taken off the table
Cleary's Description of Work states: "Proposed rezone from the "A" Zoning District to RPUD to allow for group
housing for seniors and/or residential dwelling units"
ALL of Cleary's correspondence with the County includes his request for"A maximum development density of
63 (formerly 65) residential dwelling units or 200 units of group housing for seniors" (8/27/17 PUD exhibit from
the Cleary "Planning Application Status" website)
I believe Saturnia Lakes residents would welcome this option, and make for an easy BCC compromise - if it's
good enough for Mr. Cleary to have proposed this option from day one, Saturnia would not oppose this low-rise
option.
Is there really a need for 200 additional assisted living beds in Naples?
NO! Cleary lawyers try to argue, with the aging baby boomer generation, the obvious need for additional
assisted living type of facilities. However, due to "turnover" at such facilities, the current number of beds (1765
in 24 facilities per AHCA Assisted Living Directory) in Collier County is not maxed out and there is currently no
waiting for space in the largest ALRs:
Terracina Grand - space available
Brookdale North Naples - studio available (independant living)
Tuscany Villa of Naples - space available
Barrington Terrace - space available
Bentley Village - space available
Bradford Square - space available
CCPC Chair Mark Strain was one of two "No" votes
At the 10/5 Cleary planning meeting Chair Mark Strain felt a) Cleary's proposal option for the 200 beds
ALF/CCRC should really only be zoned for 150 beds, and b) the 63 residential dwelling units should really only
be 45 - I believe he felt in both cases this was due to the standard .45 FAR. Reducing the 200 units to 150
would also reduce by 25% all support staff associated with care at the facility.
Mr. Saunders, based on these arguments I request you and the other members of the Board reject Mr.
Cleary's request for such a large structure so close to our Saturnia Lakes community, and instead approve his
smaller scale 63 townhomes option.
2
Thank you,
Dave Marin
2403 Butterfly Palm Dr.
Naples, FL 34119
914-413-2351
Cc: Donna Fiala
Andy Solis
Penny Taylor
William McDaniel, Jr.
3
GoodnerAngela
From: rick carabajal <rickcarabajal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 10:52 AM
To: SolisAndy
Subject: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Andy,
My name is Rick Carabajal I live at 1599 Triangle Palm Ter. Naples FL 34119.
I am opposed to the Cleary PUD Proposed Development on Immokalee Road just east of
Logan Ave. There are numerous issues and concerns including:
Environmental, safety, traffic, and rezoning are a few issues as to why I'm opposed to the
development along with the nonconformance and misrepresentation as to what would be
and what was proposed to the County Commissioners.
I will follow up with a phone call to you in several days in an attempt to set up a meeting
were myself and four other individuals, who have spoken to over 300 residents in the
immediate area with similar concerns. We hope to have the opportunity to meet with you to
discuss this proposal before you announce a formal position on this issue.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Rick Carabajal
1599 Triangle Plam Ter
Naples, FL 34119
5
GoodnerAngela
From: Mary Ellen Gustafson <megustafson@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 10:50 AM
To: SolisAndy
Subject: Saturnia Lakes and the Cleary Development Project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Mr. Solis:
I live in Saturnia Lakes and Cleary Development is planning to build a development next to our community.
Our Board President hired an attorney and made an agreement with Cleary without the knowledge and approval of the
580 residents of Saturnia Lakes.
We strongly urge you to vote"NO" on this project.
Listed below are some of the reasons to vote "NO".
1. It will drastically change the look of this residential area-- building a 50' building.
2. There are over 20 single family home communities that surround this Cleary project.
3. Cleary Development wants to build a 200 bed facility --the land density only allows for a 150 bed facility.
4. Originally Cleary told our residents they were building a single family home community.
5. This project will create dangerous traffic problems.
Please vote "NO"for this Cleary Development project. Thank you for taking time in your busy schedule.
Sincerely,
Rod Gustafson
239-596-7339 (home)
239-248-7301 (cell)
6
GoodnerAngela
From: Barbara Morley <bjmorley2@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 10:46 AM
Subject: RPUD CLEARY SITE - Immokalee Road
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Allow me to introduce myself. I am Barbara Morley, a resident and owner at Saturnia Lakes the community
immediately to the East of the Cleary property. I am opposed to the second option Cleary has recently put
forward. Cleary's original proposal "Option One" to developed a gated community of 63 individual houses, is
completely in keeping with all developments fronting Immokalee. Their newly proposed second option, if
approved, would allow them to build a 50' tall, two hundred multi unit building on this site. I am opposed to
option two for the following reasons;
• At the Planning Meeting held in October the Cleary representatives, under oath during the rebuttal
period, stated that a 50' high building is appropriate for this site as buildings of this height exist within
a 2 1/2 mile radius of the Cleary site. This is not true. I'm enclosing aerial views of Immokalee Road,
East and West of the Cleary site and there are no buildings greater than two stories within a 2 1/2 mile
radius.
• As you are aware, West of the Cleary property is another long, narrow 9 acre site similar to the Cleary
land. This site has been referred to as the "Walker" property. Collier County plans show an access
lane, which has been carved out of the Walker property, to be utilized by all vehicles entering and
exiting both sites through the Cleary driveway.
• Should Cleary get approval for their proposed 200 multi unit building the Walker property will surely be
looking to build a building of the same size.
• The proposed Cleary building will create traffic congestion with the addition of over 200 resident
vehicles, guest vehicles, staff and service vehicles, delivery trucks, waste removal trucks all merging
onto and off Immokalee Road. With the very likely possibility that the Walker owners, learning of a
potential Cleary approval, will also want to build a similar multi unit building, the traffic coming into and
out of the combine properties would double the number of vehicles trying to pore out onto Immokalee
via a driveway unable to handle this flow. The narrow frontage of the Cleary and Walker properties
combined is only a few hundred feet. A short distance East of Cleary is the access lane for Saturnia
where well over 580 + resident vehicles and the numerous other guest and service vehicles and school
buses merge onto and off Immokalee Road from Saturnia Lakes.
• Immokalee Road is a 6 lane speedway, 3 lanes running East and 3 lanes running West. Posted speed
limit is 45 MPH, which more often than not is ignored. With the current traffic patterns residents leaving
Saturnia and others traveling west but wish to make a left turn into Saturnia must wait for the traffic light
on Immokalee at Logan to stop the easterly bound traffic flow. This turn lane also provides "U-turn
ability for residents of Heritage Hills, a community that shares a border with Saturnia Lakes.
• We have already been told that a traffic light would not be appropriate at either Cleary's or Saturnia's
property entrances as these sites are too close to the light at Logan Blvd. This decision has already
been made by Collier County's Traffic Department, who are aware that GL is about to begin building
their shopping center on the corner of Immokalee and Logan immediate West of Cleary and Walker
properties and Saturnia Lakes development.
• The drastic increase of traffic from the GL Shopping Center, Cleary and potentially Walker properties
with the existing Saturnia Lakes and Heritage Hills will occur within a a quarter mile stretch of roadway
on Immokalee starting at the eastern exit lane of the GL shopping center.
• In addition there are two schools back to back 1/2 mile East of GL shopping center exit and the above
mentioned properties. Children can be see daily walking and riding their bikes to and from both Laurel
Oaks and Gulf Coast High on the sidewalks of Immokalee Road as well as crossing Immokalee.
For all of the above reasons I oppose Cleary's option two. Option two will change the distinctive residential
nature of Immokalee Road that is situated East of Route 75, create traffic and safety nightmares for those
7
living and traveling throughout the 1.9 mile stretch of Immokalee Road East and West from Logan intersection
to Collier Blvd.
The logical solution is for this Commission to approve Cleary's "OPTION ONE". Cleary's Option One
is suitable and the proper way to develop this site. There have been no objections by current owners
or residents to Cleary's "Option One" which would create 63 single family homes within a gated
community as outlined and still on the table in their proposals. It is the right decision for all the above
reasons
8
iPad
gico
` -
' ,
ottiti.
t"
4 A'*;Iiiitti.-',4-4''''.,-iti.,6%---. - 1----. -----'. .:,,....,.:.,:f. ...:.::.,_
,...:.,:;
...:. ,.... .:k.i.„..---.",,,,...-4.--,.-!•--"IV-t---4,,. -: .- -- '-:---- —'-
INEDITERRA
4
C1II:
t
" • `
v.
•
_ BARRINGT
ONu = � __ . COVE_4, 4- � t4:: - 4 -
- r
Y'
.
CAMDEN LAKES
1 '' - % MARSILEA
R
46i.,,,
e
s. *-----,,--!:.1"4.-..14:-'•-••--• .x r,A.yx# �:
. T [ ELASC L
ritwAst.
- g - '. " - • x
- ..
m
. ,, +� -��� f � ,.,sem, � - .-� � :c�ra�.,xrwrsr ,ux<+?.v ,.sro:: i-
iPad
ico
7.
i'
QUAIL
:.. 660 STQNECREEK
„145- �'
850
4 MILES
; ii.i ,, .. .
I LocC '
y
D
QUAIL GREEK :: RIVERSTONE
580ll 850
*•:
0 '.
J �.
QUAIL GREEK LONGSHORE OWE CYPRESS
VILLAGE LAKE 1100
10
GoodnerAngela
From: Tom Caione <tcaione@comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 8:12 PM
To: SolisAndy
Cc: GoodnerAngela
Subject: Cleary Property Proposal
Attachments: Cleary Letter.docx
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Mr. Solis,
Please see the attached regarding the Cleary Property Proposal.Thank you.
Sincerely,
Thomas and Janet Caione
2379 Butterfly palm Drive
Naples, FL 34119
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
11
GoodnerAngela
From: Rccpc7335 <rccpc7335@aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 10:47 AM
To: SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; FialaDonna; SolisAndy; McDanielBill; FilsonSue
Subject: Cleary Project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Commissioner:
I am a homeowner in Saturnia Lakes and a member of the HOA. I write to you to voice my opposition to the
Cleary project proposed to be built directly to our west along Immokalee Road. Although my wife and I
presently are in New York, I have been kept abreast of the misadventures which have occurred including your
last public hearing at which the Cleary project was discussed.
The proposal, as I understand it, is for the construction of a nursing facility for the aged and infirm with at least
one of the proposed structures to be almost 50 feet in height. Through miscommunication involving one of our
directors and his privately-hired attorney, your Board was informed that we had no objection and that Saturnia
Lakes agreed to the proposal as submitted. Nothing could be further from the truth. Although you have no
obligation to monitor our private HOA procedures, it is sufficient to state that the statement made on the record
at your hearing by that attorney was not the result of any advance notice, general meeting, or approval by the
membership. The rest is internal confusion which we now undergo as a result of the unauthorized actions I
refer to.
Let me simply state that Robert and Billie Ann Carlsen, who reside at 2350 Butterfly Palm Drive in Saturnia
Lakes, oppose the project as submitted to you and wish to be on record together with many others in informing
you of this fact.
Respectfully,
Robert C. Carlsen, Esq.
75-19 Myrtle Avenue
Glendale, NY 11385
718-366-0058
12
GoodnerAngela
From: Gerald Kelly <jspreppie71@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 3:46 PM
To: GoodnerAngela
Subject: Cleary RPUD PUDZ-PL20160001985
Ms. Goodner,
I just emailed Mr. Solis concerning the proposed development of the Cleary RPUD. This property is
on the western border of our community at the entrance and would turn right off Immokalee Road
only feet from Saturnia Lakes entrance.
The proposed four story building would dwarf our community and add to noise, traffic and accident
concerns. We also have daily school buses and vendors in and out all day. Hurricane Irma
decimated our tree line so the view of the adjacent property is now very visible and no amount of
plantings will fill-in enough to counteract the view.
Our community was taken aback at the CCPC meeting of Oct. 5th. We learned that our HOA
President had made a deal with the Cleary attorney and said the community was in favor of this
development. This is not true .The residents are in opposition to this development and had a show of
solidarity at that meeting by the wearing of white shirts and 200 petitions signed against it. Even
Mark Strain and Diane Ebert voted against the Cleary Proposal.
Please let Mr. Solis know our feelings and ask him to consider a "no" vote for us in the November
BCC meeting.
Thank you,
Susan Kelly
Saturnia Lakes resident
13
GoodnerAngela
From: Millie Corcoran <mcorcoran1029@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 3:11 PM
To: GoodnerAngela
Subject: PUD-PL20160001985
Attachments: cleary project.docx
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
14
GoodnerAngela
From: Gerald Kelly <jspreppie71@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 2:50 PM
To: SolisAndy
Subject: Cleary RPUD Project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
I am a homeowner in the Saturnia Lakes Community and I would like to go on
record as being opposed to the Cleary RPUD Project. The project would build a 4
story building on the Western border of our community that would tower over our
580 single family homes. The project is completely inconsistent with anything in
this area of Collier County both in terms of density and design. Please do not be
persuaded by the argument that the Cleary group has the full support of the
Saturnia Lakes HOA. They do not and they know it. They have the full support of
one individual who happens to be the HOA president. This individual signed a
back room deal with Cleary that no one else in our community knew anything
about. We are currently in the process of removing him from office. Please cast
your vote to reject this ill conceived project.
Thank You,
Jerry Kelly
15
GoodnerAngela
From: Gerald Kelly <jspreppie71@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 2:36 PM
To: SolisAndy
Subject: Cleary RPUD PUDZ-PL20160001985
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Mr. Solis,
I am a resident of Saturnia Lakes Community off Immokalee Road in North
Naples. Our community is adjacent to the Cleary RPUD Project on our western
border.
I am strongly opposed to the proposed development of this property as they
presented a four story building that would dwarf our entrance which has now lost
the tree line due to Hurricane Irma.
Also, with the shopping center going in on Logan Blvd. there will be more traffic,
noise and potential accidents. The Cleary Property entrance will be on
Immokalee Road next to Staturnia Lakes entrance which will cause traffic issues
as there are numerous school buses every morning and afternoon in our
community.
Please consider a "no" vote as did Mark Strain and Diane Ebert (CCPC).
Thank you,
Susan Kelly
Saturnia Lakes Resident
16
GoodnerAngela
From: Val <vgmgp@aol.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 4:05 PM
To: SolisAndy
Cc: GoodnerAngela
Subject: Cleary development on Immokolee
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Mr Solis, I live in Saturnian Lakes and I object to the height and proximity of the proposed Cleary development
next to Saturnia. This commercial property is proposed to adversely and directly affect the view from my lanai. I will
lose privacy and property value. With all the senior care developments in the area, when occupancy rates become
challenging, how will this property be used in 10 years or more? Let's think ahead of a developers immediate appeal.
Do not approve this proposed 5 story building so close to residential property. No more than 2 or 3 stories! And they
need to install a dense tree barrier between their commercial property and private property.
Demand alterations that benefit long term collier residents in Saturnia ,please!!
Valerie Palmieri
2415 Butterfly Palm Drive
Naples, Florida
Sent from my iPad
17
GoodnerAngela
From: romeysr@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 3:32 PM
To: SolisAndy
Cc: GoodnerAngela
Subject: Cleary PUD in North Naples
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Mr. Solis:
My name is Jerome Palmieri. Since 2013 I have been a homeowner in the Saturnia Lakes community (2415 Butterfly
Palm Drive) in North Naples. I am writing to you to express my strong opposition to the proposed Cleary development
project to build a five story senior housing building next door to Saturnia Lakes. Let me be clear: I am not opposed to a
senior community being located on that property. I am against any three to five story building in that location. Saturnia
Lakes is a beautiful upscale community. The landscaping on the tree lined main entrance into Saturnia Lakes creates one
of the most elegant entryways of any community in all of Naples. The proposed multistory building will be next door to
that main entrance and will ruin the beautiful view that we homeowners and our guests now experience. Property values
will be damaged if you approve this large, multistory building to be constructed. Additionally, with my property being
located on Butterfly Palm Drive (which runs parallel to the main entrance), the view from the back of my home will go from
the privacy of the existing tree lined entryway to the bricks, windows and roofing tiles of the Cleary building.
I strongly oppose the Cleary project as it will decrease all of the property values in the Saturnia Lakes community. Please
do not vote to approve this project.
Thank you,
Jerome Palmieri
(610)405-3099
romeysr@aol.com
18
GoodnerAngela
From: romeysr@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 3:32 PM
To: SolisAndy
Cc: GoodnerAngela
Subject: Cleary PUD in North Naples
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Mr. Solis:
My name is Jerome Palmieri. Since 2013 I have been a homeowner in the Saturnia Lakes community (2415 Butterfly
Palm Drive) in North Naples. I am writing to you to express my strong opposition to the proposed Cleary development
project to build a five story senior housing building next door to Saturnia Lakes. Let me be clear: I am not opposed to a
senior community being located on that property. I am against any three to five story building in that location. Saturnia
Lakes is a beautiful upscale community. The landscaping on the tree lined main entrance into Saturnia Lakes creates one
of the most elegant entryways of any community in all of Naples. The proposed multistory building will be next door to
that main entrance and will ruin the beautiful view that we homeowners and our guests now experience. Property values
will be damaged if you approve this large, multistory building to be constructed. Additionally, with my property being
located on Butterfly Palm Drive (which runs parallel to the main entrance), the view from the back of my home will go from
the privacy of the existing tree lined entryway to the bricks, windows and roofing tiles of the Cleary building.
I strongly oppose the Cleary project as it will decrease all of the property values in the Saturnia Lakes community. Please
do not vote to approve this project.
Thank you,
Jerome Palmieri
(610)405-3099
romeysr@aol.com
19
GoodnerAngela
From: Paul Petras <plpetras@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 12:37 PM
To: SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; FialaDonna; SolisAndy; McDanielBill
Cc: DavidLykins@colliergov.net
Subject: Proposed Rezoning for PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary RPUD
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Commissioners:
At the October 5th meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission, Mr. Manganaro indicated that the Saturnia
Lakes HOA supports the Cleary development, but all of the Saturnia homeowners that I know are against it. Having 50
ft. tall buildings, so close to our main entrance,will destroy the integrity and charm of our community and those high
density buildings will add traffic congestion to Immokalee Road,which is already extremely busy and destined to get
busier once the recently approved Landings at Logan development is completed. Please protect our community and our
home values by disapproving the proposed rezoning for the Cleary development or, at a minimum, restrict the height of
buildings to 3 stories (above the current floodplain elevation of that lot) and increase the setback requirements.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Paul Petras
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner
1714 Triangle Palm Terrace
Naples, FL 34119
20
GoodnerAngela
From: Patricia Rose <patrose@me.com>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 10:12 PM
To: SaundersBurt;TaylorPenny; FialaDonna; SolisAndy; McDanielBill;
DavidLykins@colliergov.net; GrecoSherry; BrownleeMichael; GoodnerAngela; FilsonSue
Subject: Cleary Project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Mr. Saunders,
I am writing to express my concern over the construction of the Cleary Project, which is being proposed for the parcel
next to Saturnia Lakes. I believe building this project would affect the aesthetics of the area as well as cause real
problems with excessive traffic compounded by the shopping center that has been approved. It is already difficult to
exit Saturnia during high traffic times. Construction of this project would exacerbate the problem. This new
construction could also negatively affect our property values. It would take away from the beauty of our entrance and
would be seen from all areas of the complex because of its height. It would be the only tall building in the area.
Please vote no on approving this project. The voters of Saturnia are depending on you.
Patricia A. Rose
1988 Isla de Palma Circle
Sent from my iPad
21
GoodnerAngela
From: Patricia Rose <patrose@me.com>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 10:12 PM
To: SaundersBurt;TaylorPenny; FialaDonna; SolisAndy; McDanielBill;
DavidLykins@colliergov.net; GrecoSherry; BrownleeMichael; GoodnerAngela; FilsonSue
Subject: Cleary Project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Mr. Saunders,
I am writing to express my concern over the construction of the Cleary Project, which is being proposed for the parcel
next to Saturnia Lakes. I believe building this project would affect the aesthetics of the area as well as cause real
problems with excessive traffic compounded by the shopping center that has been approved. It is already difficult to
exit Saturnia during high traffic times. Construction of this project would exacerbate the problem. This new
construction could also negatively affect our property values. It would take away from the beauty of our entrance and
would be seen from all areas of the complex because of its height. It would be the only tall building in the area.
Please vote no on approving this project. The voters of Saturnia are depending on you.
Patricia A. Rose
1988 Isla de Palma Circle
Sent from my iPad
22
GoodnerAngela
From: Joseph Dykstra <jhdykstra@verizon.net>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 5:51 PM
To: SaundersBurt; DavidLykins@colliergov.net;TaylorPenny; SherryGreco@collier.net;
FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael; SolisAndy; GoodnerAngela; McDanielBill; FilsonSue
Subject: Re: Cleary PUD
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
Despite the impression that you may have received from our board president and lawyer, we the residents of Saturnia
Lakes are not at all in favor of the Cleary Project and strongly oppose it. Let's look at the reasons:
1. The height of the proposed building(s)will take away the little view of nature we have in that area and the privacy it
now gives us, especially for those living close to or at the front of our community.
2. It will create traffic problems with entrances and exits for Saturnia and Cleary both on Immokalee Rd., especially during
commuter hours when traffic is fast and heavy. This will be in addition to the light and turn in/turn out difficulties that the
grocery shopping center will create on the corner of Logan Blvd. and Immokalee. Also, how does that all feed in when
Logan becomes a 4 lane highway in the future?
3. What about the fact that there are 2 schools close by on Immokalee that have bus traffic there morning and afternoon
as well as a large volume of parent drop offs and pickups that has increased since two new communities were developed
between Logan and Collier Blvd. on the north side of Immokalee recently? The increase in population at Laurel Oak
Elementary and at Gulf Coast High attest to that.
4. New man- made buildings will add to the problems of natural water absorption that planted areas can do and buildings
and paved areas cannot.
5. More housing will add to the strain on the electric grid. Just look at the problems that occurred during and after the
hurricane. Sewer water came bubbling up from manhole covers here in Saturnia and neighboring communities along with
others farther from here. As I understand it this was caused by the jolt of power being restored in parts of our and other
communities.
6. Removal of plants does affect the quality of our air and the amount of oxygen that plants give us. The project will also
add to the amount of vehicle exhaust from more in and out traffic.
7. There would be increased noise (a lot) during construction which would especially affect the homeowners near the
front of Saturniia. The in-place foliage provides some buffer now from traffic noise on Immokalee, but removal of trees
takes away a huge part of that buffer.
8. Increased trash pickup will add even more noise to the Saturnia environment.
9. Revenue gained will also have to be revenue spent and most likely even more to handle all the problems over time this
development will create.
10. Have you looked at the fact that there are two large senior housing developments on Vanderbilt in high rise structures
which are not filled to capacity? If this proposed project is targeted to seniors or others, how will being so close to a road
that is probably busier than Vanderbilt affect purchase?
Finally, we ask that you not devalue our homes and lose tax value you already have. We ask that you not devalue us,
your constituents, and our needs and desires and the trust and value of our votes.
23
GoodnerAngela
From: Joseph Dykstra <jhdykstra@verizon.net>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 5:51 PM
To: SaundersBurt; DavidLykins@colliergov.net; TaylorPenny; SherryGreco@collier.net;
FialaDonna; BrownleeMichael; SolisAndy; GoodnerAngela; McDanielBill; FilsonSue
Subject: Re: Cleary PUD
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
Despite the impression that you may have received from our board president and lawyer, we the residents of Saturnia
Lakes are not at all in favor of the Cleary Project and strongly oppose it. Let's look at the reasons:
1. The height of the proposed building(s) will take away the little view of nature we have in that area and the privacy it
now gives us, especially for those living close to or at the front of our community.
2. It will create traffic problems with entrances and exits for Saturnia and Cleary both on Immokalee Rd., especially during
commuter hours when traffic is fast and heavy. This will be in addition to the light and turn in/turn out difficulties that the
grocery shopping center will create on the corner of Logan Blvd. and Immokalee. Also, how does that all feed in when
Logan becomes a 4 lane highway in the future?
3. What about the fact that there are 2 schools close by on Immokalee that have bus traffic there morning and afternoon
as well as a large volume of parent drop offs and pickups that has increased since two new communities were developed
between Logan and Collier Blvd. on the north side of Immokalee recently? The increase in population at Laurel Oak
Elementary and at Gulf Coast High attest to that.
4. New man-made buildings will add to the problems of natural water absorption that planted areas can do and buildings
and paved areas cannot.
5. More housing will add to the strain on the electric grid. Just look at the problems that occurred during and after the
hurricane. Sewer water came bubbling up from manhole covers here in Saturnia and neighboring communities along with
others farther from here. As I understand it this was caused by the jolt of power being restored in parts of our and other
communities.
6. Removal of plants does affect the quality of our air and the amount of oxygen that plants give us. The project will also
add to the amount of vehicle exhaust from more in and out traffic.
7. There would be increased noise (a lot) during construction which would especially affect the homeowners near the
front of Saturniia. The in-place foliage provides some buffer now from traffic noise on Immokalee, but removal of trees
takes away a huge part of that buffer.
8. Increased trash pickup will add even more noise to the Saturnia environment.
9. Revenue gained will also have to be revenue spent and most likely even more to handle all the problems over time this
development will create.
10. Have you looked at the fact that there are two large senior housing developments on Vanderbilt in high rise structures
which are not filled to capacity? If this proposed project is targeted to seniors or others, how will being so close to a road
that is probably busier than Vanderbilt affect purchase?
Finally, we ask that you not devalue our homes and lose tax value you already have. We ask that you not devalue us,
your constituents, and our needs and desires and the trust and value of our votes.
25
GoodnerAngela
From: Richard C. Guliano <guliano610@outlook.com>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 4:32 PM
To: SolisAndy
Subject: cleary development
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
By allowing this project to be approved,you will not only hurt the home values of fellow Neapolitans, but will cause
traffic jam beyond belief at this corner with 200 residential units and a new shopping center....please reconsider
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
27
GoodnerAngela
Subject: call to the office re: Cleary Development
Start: Fri 10/13/2017 3:45 PM
End: Fri 10/13/2017 4:00 PM
Recurrence: (none)
Organizer: SolisAndy
Jerry Kelly, of Saturnia Lakes, called in opposition to the Cleary Development project proposed for next door to Saturnia.
He stated that many Saturnia Lakes residents are opposed despite the HOA President's support of the project.
GoodnerAngela
Subject: Meeting Request: Cleary PUD, Rich Yovanovich and Mr. Cleary
Location: Cohen & Grigsby
Start: Mon 11/13/2017 9:30 AM
End: Mon 11/13/2017 10:00 AM
Recurrence: (none)
Meeting Status: Accepted
Organizer: GoodnerAngela
Required Attendees: Andrew I. Solis (ASolis@cohenlaw.com)
Categories: Mercato Office
From: Dianna Quintanilla <DQuintanilla@cyklawfirm.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 11:31 AM
To: GoodnerAngela
Subject: Meeting Request: Cleary PUD
Good morning,
Rich would like to schedule a meeting for the upcoming agenda item: Cleary PUD. We realize it doesn't go to
the BCC until November 14th but because our client (Mr. Cleary) lives out of state, I am trying to schedule
meetings for Monday November 13th so he will be able to fly into Naples and attend.
Please let me know when the Commissioner is available on Monday November 13th
Thank you in advance.
Dianna Quintanilla
Legal Assistant to
1
Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq.
The Northern Trust Building
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
P: 239.435.3535 I F: 239.435.1218
dquintanilla@cyklawfirm.com
Visit cyklawfirm.com to learn more about us.
Both Dianna Quintanilla and Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., intend that this message be used
exclusively by the addressee(s).
This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law.
Unauthorized disclosure or use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please
notify Leanne Farmosa immediately at dquintanilla(@_cyklawfirm.com or call (239) 435-3535, and
permanently dispose of the original message.
2
GoodnerAngela
Subject: Cleary PUD with Patrick Neale and Michael Manganaro, President of Saturnia Lakes
Location: Cohen &Grigsby
Start: Fri 11/10/2017 10:00 AM
End: Fri 11/10/2017 10:30 AM
Recurrence: (none)
Meeting Status: Meeting organizer
Organizer: SolisAndy
Required Attendees: Andrew I. Solis (ASolis@cohenlaw.com)
Categories: Mercato Office
Hello, Angela -
Attorney Patrick Neale would like to bring Mr. Michael Manganaro, President of the Saturnia Lakes HOA,to discuss the
Cleary PUD with the Commissioner. This is an agenda item for the November 14 BCC meeting.
I can suggest the following times:
- November 7—before 3 pm
- November 8—morning
- November 10—all day
Please let me know when we can set up this meeting, and the Commissioner's preferred location.
If you prefer,feel free to give me a call at 239-642-1485.
Thank-you in advance for your assistance!
Best regards,
Karen Kfukiewicz
Chief of Operations
Assistant to Attorney Patrick H. Neale
Patrick Neale&Associates
Phone: 239-642-1485
Fax: 239-642-1487
Email: karen@patrickneale.com
Email Servicing: email-servicepatrickneale.com
www.patrickneale.com
Principal Office
5470 Bryson Court, Suite 103
Naples, FL 34109
Marco Island Office
1
950 North Collier Blvd.
Marco Island, FL 34145
Mailing Address
P. 0. Box 9440
Naples, FL 34101-9440
2
GoodnerAngela
Subject: Rod Gustafson, Pat Howard, Bob Owens - all of Saturnia Lakes, Cleary PUD
Location: BCC Office
Start: Fri 11/3/2017 2:30 PM
End: Fri 11/3/2017 3:00 PM
Recurrence: (none)
Meeting Status: Meeting organizer
Organizer: SolisAndy
Required Attendees: Andrew I. Solis (ASolis@cohenlaw.com)
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the opportunity to meet you. Looking forward to seeing you on Friday at 2:30
pm November 3rd. I'll email you specific points of concern as well as additional information
which should be helpful in the decision making process. Is it okay that I ask Pat Howard,
Rod Gustafson and Gerald Kelly to also attend the meeting as each can articulate specific
concerns?
Looking forward to meeting you on Friday November 3rd 2:30 p.m.
Rick Carabajal (ultimately unable to attend due to an emergency)
From: SolisAndy <AndySolis aC�colliergov.net>
To: rick carabajal <rickcarabajalyahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 5:00 PM
Subject: RE: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Hello, Rick:
Is your group available at 2:30 this Friday afternoon? Let me know, and if so, send me the names of
all who will be attending. If you have any written materials, the Commissioner prefers to have them in
advance, so that you can discuss them together. Brief directions and a link to a map of the county
complex is below. I look forward to hearing from you.
The Board of County Commissioners offices are located in the Government Complex at 3299
Tamiami Trail East, at the corner of Airport and the East Trail. (HERE is a link to a map of the
complex. If you're coming from the North or West, use the entrance off Airport and drive through the
complex; if you're coming from the South/East, the entrance from the East Trail is the easiest.) The
easiest thing to do is use Parking Garage #2. Our offices are in Building F. You'll pass through a
metal detector at the entrance to the building, and they'll direct you from there.
Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator
Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq.
Collier County District 2
Phone: 239.252.8602
Fax: 239.252.6947
Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE!
From: rick carabajal [mailto:rickcarabajal(a�yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 8:36 AM
To: SolisAndy <AndySolis(a�colliergov.net>
Subject: Re: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the response, I'm wondering if you might have 15-30 minutes sometime before the
November hearing where we might have a chance to personally meet and discuss 5 specific
concerns regarding the Cleary PUD development to be voted on at the November hearing. After
canvasing the surrounding areas including various community developments in and around
Immokalee Road and Logan Avenue, the immediate area which could be directly affected by their
development. This is also in addition to the commercial development taking palace in the immediate
area by GL Homes.
GL Homes took a different approach and met with its potential new neighbors, were sensitive to
neighbors needs and concerns and the long term effects that would result to the developed area. GL
Homes made sure all issues were considered and agreed upon as opposed to the Cleary PUD
approach, maximizing profit dollars on a development without respect to the environmental, safety,
zoning, consideration of existing neighbors and the consistency of what is and will be built in the
future to maintain a safe consistent community landscape.
I'm not convinced the Cleary PUD development proposal is in the immediate communities or Collier
County's best interest if it is to proceed with as planned and would like to share my concerns along
with three other individuals who have also done extensive research on the proposal with you if
possible.
Please let me know what your schedule permits, I'll try calling you this afternoon if I don"t hear back
from the email. I look forward to hearing from you. I appreciate your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Rick Carabajal
From: SolisAndy <AndySolis(a�colliergov.net>
To: rick carabajal <rickcarabajal c(Dyahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Hello, Mr. Carabajal:
Thank you for your email detailing your concerns regarding the proposed Cleary development. Call
me when you're ready to schedule a meeting, and we'll see when we can get it set up.
2
Sent on behalf of Commissioner Solis by
Angela Goodner, Executive Coordinator
Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq.
Collier County District 2
Phone: 239.252.8602
Fax: 239.252.6947
Sign up for the District 2 newsletter HERE!
From: rick carabajal [mailto:rickcarabajal(c�yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 10:52 AM
To: SolisAndy <AndySolis@colliergov.net>
Subject: CLEARY DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION REQUEST HELP
Dear Andy,
My name is Rick Carabajal I live at 1599 Triangle Palm Ter. Naples FL 34119.
I am opposed to the Cleary PUD Proposed Development on Immokalee Road just east of Logan Ave.
There are numerous issues and concerns including:
Environmental, safety, traffic, and rezoning are a few issues as to why I'm opposed to the
development along with the nonconformance and misrepresentation as to what would be and what
was proposed to the County Commissioners.
I will follow up with a phone call to you in several days in an attempt to set up a meeting were myself
and four other individuals, who have spoken to over 300 residents in the immediate area with similar
concerns. We hope to have the opportunity to meet with you to discuss this proposal before you
announce a formal position on this issue.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Rick Carabajal
1599 Triangle Plam Ter
Naples, FL 34119
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
3
CLEARY DEVELOPMENT
• On 9 acres the developer is asking for a change in density of .6 allowing 150 units of
senior/assisted living to a .45 density allowing 200 units. The community of Saturnia
Lakes has 580 units with a density of.3. Across the street the Olde Cypress community
has 1,100 units with a density of.2+.
• Saturnia Lakes has only single family homes and this project is asking for a height
allowance of 40-50 feet. With it's proximity to Saturnia Grande Blvd this will impact
views, privacy and potential return on investment.
• A shopping center is planned nearby at the corner of Logan and Immokalee. The
shopping center has a 30,000 sq ft grocery store, space for 7 restaurants and 15 other
retail spaces ranging from 1,250-8,000 square ft. The planned building height is between
18-22 feet. This has the potential to generate a high volume of traffic in a very congested
area.
• Combined, the three properties would have 3 entrances/exits within 0.2 miles between
Logan and the entrance to Saturnia Lakes. Increasing traffic on an already heavily
trafficked road.
• The only entrance/exit for the Cleary Development and Heritage Greens is on
Immokalee Rd which requires a u-turn to head West increasing the potential for motor
vehicle accidents.
• The 9 acres designated for the Cleary Development is already flood prone and with the
surface hardening the risk for flooding increases. Both Saturnia Lakes and Heritage
Greens had major failures of the sewer system with hurricane Irma. Saturnia Lakes
residents were unable to use bathrooms and Heritage Greens had raw sewage on the
streets. The flooding also increased the length of time the communities were without
electricity.
• Any zoning change should either benefit or compliment the adjacent community. This
project does neither.
• The requested change does not address the issue of inadequate beds/residences for
affordable housing for seniors or people on medicaid. The need to staff an assisted living
facility and lack of affordable housing will increase the number of workers commuting
from outside Collier County adding to an already burdened traffic problem on local roads
and 1-75.
• The average cost for assisted living in Collier is $4,500 a month, extras excluded. This
cost is out of reach for many of our senior citizens who wish to remain in a community
where they have developed strong ties.
• We believe this project places an undue burden on the surrounding communities, and
Saturnia Lakes in particular, without benefit to the larger Collier Community.
• We are not against any development on the site. We would support a community with a
reasonable number of single family homes or a low rise apartment/condo complex.
i,.. ,
i"` - `
< o l'
D
o0
o I- i
m o m Z
m
--1 D 1 1 i m
11Ii C7 _ n
n `9s K`Y
T +.... .
p1 0` D
moo °
ii 11 11 i i i i 1
L., I n .........„.....r----,
i
oil ,
.LOGAN BOULEVARD LOGAN BOULEVARD o
mi r§1 i
NI 141 MI ll
all i I
IMI
g
el i ,
1
I r o ° Z 1
re z
il 1 i n i
i i $1, i
I pa
� 1 fii 5 1 , g`
m 1R.
m �i
N.
I
4
1
OOSb-96L (17S6) • £Z£££id 'asuuns
-1 ID :1]WW O OOtr a/Ins 'Kenn)1aed a.eaodioj ssea6nneS 009i
V
A
a vasalc '
_ fes... ,
s
,.
..,, ic, ,te,l'3r i1'2
uo„uala}{
- ' i ___A frl -*
, _ ...1, telt, .
Il
i `
r '-tvt ,rf-A e.--
� _ — / fj tit L 1; fir;___
r
irk or,
,r i f.� r^� P � F Tr' i\\\\\j J`}f :Y' iµ - `
/ % :y '/' ‘,9-‘,;....„>,,,,-,-' "i% A Ir.!'
°
Pi
•
fk
4a. 1.11mg a? C
r-----7 i -
ti iiih''' ''''t% � '} i f s
i'\ ' a v ‘..) ti / 17�r! z P4
dl
1 Itedi ,_,' \/,"-- , '9' its. ''' V:;*-kii,, vA tit°,\O r‘:..
illir #5'
_ . 4s,..fifit„. "VI ,„,, s."!.....- , fr-,, ...,,,,,, e.....,
CIO
co
; j„,,,- 1 i - - -` .. t1. fb, Q r',---- --17--z--J—, -- f). o
J 4
.� t
- _N* i ' - G G 4' ' Iu 0 'Air, `
QJY
£; i11M Asti-U1 ' is O u Q
- a 7 r .
D (i..,. 1.,,- v4 0r
464*_,66,4ii
[ -'4 to tQ 4k's ;°",--7
' n fit]- - -.: r„ 7: "ttt r* 4111VI'-'' r'‘,-- ."... - -.° ,' .f .-f-4`:-e:'
MIM ti ” r Q �
, 4 ' - fel.,
LSF - ze.e
'-, '- ..v: ro die T
„ ,,,,-------- ,f ,,...---....7---;---r...,, ,... ,,,c:-- ' ' ; ,
altFd
3. ti ►SII 'nor 7
l
a
t moi+to .. c- - _Ca ( '• -
2
K 4 g
peon aaleNowwi
NY1dIII :,
SITEPLAN
immokatee Road
_ ,.,
v
t
II=
CO . ,,, tf
0; e
K
i J - I :hli,-
Pace! AIM w
J 11
! 4
�' u t
y
is fl Z'1 ' I...
a8
Road . ,
# e ��, -, - ter= pn_
t
q.9 2 3Ze Y$' I. 3 D� - rr "`'1' ` �y
i *1•6**
a rtom . _' 1• '.17
t t la i' y, t.
;ti in-Lime
rz L sietal(
,,,,r,,,Lz„,..,,,:,,,,..,, ,,,,,,,-„,.:-, ,,,,-;_, co '4.. 4 -- \ :. • 411s‘, ""' lie 6,11.i ''''
C j ,t
z_____
.,
4iisv ,
m 0 4110 *4 '; . ,
t. ¢ 1 li6ib i=ty. 1
,,t
te
$ r' ,yayt / t_ te
a
*Vr • C g v 'i
T _ v
4.
-_.,—
4,:,
3 Retrir:on
,� 2.B 4c.Traci-
2.12 Ackstater
i
•
a<_
1600 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway, Suite 400
Sunrise FL 33323 • (954) 796-4500 commERiciAL.
. ,
O O O
�Cyx
id id id id idn n n n n n n n 1 n n to y . y . 0 0id
n 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 016 O ro n
A ►+ O �D 00 V Q\ Gt •P w N �+ ►+ Ci' .P w N ra N 0 Cil
r C" "
i 4
.p W N
CA
W r+ y WON r CO )—Lr r r r r r N N r r r N W W A
01 0 O 00 C O CT N - =4 N 0 V OG - Co -5 r •
O p �j 00 O O O O 0O1 O O O O O O O p O O O O O O
O p
t-
›
C C . C C r C C C C C C C C C C C C g C C 4
E 4 EtiiEEEEE .
we:iota ow w ww , ww w ea w ea w
ri
til ttr=i tt ttii tt L H trri tri tt til tri tt Iril tr=J trrl trri ttrl trrJ til trrl tr='J tt
LC:,4N8L VL',
1 Out Parcel.
1 7 ..‘''. (\a". it ...• c.,\ „_______
„, , Di
V \
`
ij ' \'\'' V> C\I4 �� n i a-
: ie �)
1 c,,\ r-"- 0 ,-- , \ _ 1_, 5. ..
t\ ti
N 4. \,. ‘\,-.5,L, ,.." _.,.ss----- oh ,L, ci-lirtcor „v.. -,-, r
: m r_. r
1iN &
Otkr A . '' '
Q j !~ L
E 3 r' 10'1{0
'.-1 2 1 ,\ -( ,''''' '" II.,..L..1— ---- r.,_._ ni
n
LI g t L:__
I - II US (jam)
r
1
�] � ,
I -
PRESERVE • 1 - -
x
N
— _lir
IMMOKALEE ROAD(CR846)100'RIGHT-OF-WAY
20'WIDE TYPE'D'LANDSCAPE BUFFER I ,
0 50• 100.
—.___tea _ SCALE:1"=100'
(,/,,,/,,,,,/,,,,,,
'' '7 (-7-77(,).
/r/r.
/)-1 - r
I rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr1I
rrrrrrrrrrrI
TRACT OS15" 1
I /,„,r,,r,, r,,r,,rJr I
I (OPEN SPACE,
WATER MANAGEMENT 1 I _ I D.E.ANDA.E.) 1
r
I;r r ff rr//)//;//;f rrr I I 1�
POTENTIAL I I /e/////rr rr ///rr
INTERCONNECTION rr rr rrr rrr rr rr
I I r r r r r I , SATURNIA LAKES
, SK,,rr,�r r1_� I I i 15'L.B.E.
I
� 1
30'RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT
(OR 111,P''28) I CONCEPTUAL _ I //
TORE VACATED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING I :'
I
II
II '
Ii , I
I I iI
15'WIDE
PUD BOUNDARY TYPE
LANDSCAPE I D
BUFFER I l i c y
C
ZONED:A I I z D C
UNDEVELOPED I i i I y RIGASPUD
x oy r- RESIDENTIAL
I CONCEPTUAL I I I w m
I RESIDENTIAL I ; o rn-13
BUILDING I I m -81
D O
10'WIDETYPE'A' I I I I o m
LANDSCAPE BUFFER I
- I I
SITE DATA I I I
TOTAL SITE AREA: 8.99±AC
RESIDENTIAL 5.36±AC CONCEPTUAL I I
PRESERVE 1.27±AC RESIDENTIAL BUILDING11
WATER MANAGEMENT 1.0±AC I I I 11 \
BUFFERS/OPEN SPACE 1.36±AC
I
MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS: 65 - I I `I
MAXIMUM GROUP HOUSING UNITS: 200 I 30'RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT
MAXIMUM DENSITY: 7 DU/AC TO(OBE VACATED PG TI I
R BE I ��
PRESERVE: \
REQUIRED-1.27±ACRES(8.46±ACRES NATIVE I I \`
VEGETATION X 15%) "
PROVIDED-1.27±ACRES iW y �WZ mt
l g N 1 W .` y W m a a + ,\
OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED PROVIDED w a v LL W W W I 15'L.B.E.
RESIDENTIAL: 5.4±AC(60%) 5.4±AC(60%) - y l'" "•,.W• y • EV�y * ' I \`
GROUP HOUSING: 2.7±AC(30%) 2.7±AC(30%) ' - 0 o p " "' " W - " - `
W 4-- --'---'a---e---4---.- 4.---,- ----'—
NOTES W .. W W . . .
J
1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS RIGAS PUD '1\
SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO
RESIDENTIAL \
AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. SATURN/A LAKES PLAT ONE
2. ALL ACREAGES, EXCEPT PRESERVE, ARE
APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION (PB 36,PG 56-65)
TRACT"OS 15" it\
AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LDC. (OPEN SPACE,D.E.ANDA.E.)
3. THE EXISTING PRESERVES WILL MEET BUFFER
REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTICS ARE REMOVED. I
LEGEND CLEARY RPM) acim
®GradyMinor 0 c ' WM
rva Ws REVISED
"•°��+ EXHIBIT C 05/08/2017 m.
Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors . Plamers . Landscape Archiints MASTER PLAN
Moelu Um¢.21a'aax.,•rt a.+,niY<orm,... Ix<.,.r,.s arc Apene zaaaso.aa® WW1 1c 0I 1
l' U.rc+cv.rnwaa.,ww-PLUMING,14,1-area."aOPmry acture iva,amo,a6Iwwom,Acna ver c"KT_n_oac 5/6/20172,1 w
EXHIBIT D
FOR
CLEARY RPUD
PARCEL 1
(OR 2651, PG 2615)
THE WEST HALF (W 1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE
1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 2
(OR 5355, PG 1948)
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, LYING AND BEING IN THE COUNTY OF COLLIER AND STATE OF FLORIDA
PARCELS 1 & 2 CONTAINING 8.99 ACRES MORE OR LESS COMBINED
Cleary RPUD Page 5 of 8 May 8,2017
1523 Pacaya Cove
Naples, Florida 34119
November 1, 2017
— RECEIVED--
Commissioner Andy Solis
Board of County Commissioners NOV 6 2017
3299 Tamiami Trail East
Suite 303 By.
Naples, Florida 34112
Re: Zoning Change - Cleary PUD (PUDZ-PL20160001985)
Dear Commissioner Solis:
I am a resident of Saturnia Lakes, a community of 580 single family houses, and am
requesting your support in opposition to the proposed rezoning of the property on Immokalee Road
and Saturnia Lakes Blvd.
This proposed zoning change would allow a five story, 50 ft. high, 200 group housing unit
in an area surrounded by 1 and 2 story homes. This is entirely incompatible with the adjacent
community. A project of this size would have an adverse effect on property values, add to the
traffic congestion problem on Immokalee Road, create a noise condition in the surrounding
residential community, and possibly create a flooding situation in Saturnia Lakes. Water did come
dangerously close to our homes during Hurricane Irma.
I believe any building on this property should be similar in height, scope and character to
the neighborhood it borders.
I hope you will join the residents of Saturnia Lakes in their opposition to this proposed
zoning change. Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Yours truly,
404-30:9f--446-1-
Diane Jaskot
1523 Pacaya Comae- A
DECEIVED) —
Naples, Florida 4119
October 31, 201' NOV 6 2017
Commissioner Andy Solis By.
Board of County Commissioners
3299 Tamiami Trail East
Suite 303
Naples, Florida 34112
Re: Zoning Change - Cleary PUD (PUDZ-PL20160001985)
Dear Commissioner Solis:
As a resident of Naples, I am writing to express my opposition to the request to rezone the property on
Immokalee Road,just west of Saturnia Lakes Blvd.
This proposed zoning change would allow a five story, 50 ft. high, 200 group housing unit in an area
surrounded by 1 and 2 story single family homes. This is entirely incompatible with the adjacent community.
Any building on this property should be complementary with the nearby neighborhood. Height restrictions
should be consistent with the adjoining Saturnia Lakes development of 580 homes.
I am sure you would not like a five story building next to your single family home. This proposal would destroy
property values in the neighborhood, add an unacceptable level of noise to the surrounding homes, and
dramatically contribute to the traffic congestion on Immokalee Road with cars and trucks exiting and entering
the facility. Flooding would also be a potential problem, as this development plans to tap into the Saturnia
Lakes discharge system which is already overtaxed. During Hurricane Irma water was within inches of many of
our homes.
I sincerely hope you will support the residents of Saturnia Lakes in their opposition to this proposed zoning
change. Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Respectfully,
•
42-71/
Albert J. Jaskot