The URL can be used to link to this page

Spec Master Minutes 05/06/2005 May 6, 2005 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MASTER Naples, Florida, May 6, 2005 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Special Master in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:45 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: SPECIAL MASTER: Honorable Brenda Garretson COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: Leonardo Bonanno, Secretary to the Special Master 1 ".~--,.- HEARING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MASTER AGENDA Date: MAY 6, 2005 8:45 A.M. Location: 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, Collier County Government Center Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBA TIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. NEITHER COLLIER COUNTY NOR THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THIS RECORD. 1. CALL TO ORDER 1. HONORABLE SPECIAL MASTER BRENDA GARRETSON PRESIDING 2. HEARING RULES AND PROCEDURES Leonardo Bonanno, Secretary to the Special Master 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. MOTIONS 1. Motions for Continuance 1. 2. 3. 4. BCC ys. Frank Lagonigro BCC ys. William Careccia BCC ys. Norman Erickson BCC Ys. Gary & Angela Sanch 2005020112 SO 132772 CE 0337 2004070464 2. Motion for Order 1. BCC ys. Norman Bell CE 0731 B. HEARINGS 1. CASE NO: SO 146799 OWNER: CRAIG BARTHOLOW OFFICER: BILL HEMS VIOLATIONS: ORD. SEe. 130-67 HANDICAP PARKING VIOLATION 2. CASE NO: SO 146425 OWNER: STUART MCFETRIDGE OFFICER: BILL HEMS VIOLATIONS: ORD. SEe. 130-67 HANDICAP PARKING VIOLATION 3. CASE NO: SO 132772 OWNER: WILLIAM CARECCIA OFFICER: DEP. PAINTER VIOLATIONS: ORD. SEe. 130-67 HANDICAP PARKING VIOLATION 4. CASE NO: SO 133474 OWNER: NAPLES NISSAN OFFICER: DONALD LOTHROP VIOLATIONS: ORD. SEe. 130-66(1)(H) FIRE LANE VIOLATION 5. CASE NO: SO 145152 OWNER: JUAN ACEVEDO OFFICER: LAWRENCE KELLER VIOLATIONS: ORD. SEe. 130-67 HANDICAP PARKING VIOLATION 6. CASE NO: SO 145197 OWNER: MARY ANN WILLIAMS OFFICER: LA WRENCE KELLER VIOLATIONS: ORD. SEe. 130-67 HANDICAP PARKING VIOLATION 7. CASE NO: SO 135557 OWNER: ROBIN SIZEMORE OFFICER: DEP. LAPIERE VIOLATIONS: ORD. SEC. 130-66 UNLAWFUL AREA VIOLATION 8. CASE NO: SO 134265 OWNER: MARC SCHNEE OFFICER: DEP. SANTORIELLO VIOLATIONS: NO ORD. SEC. STATED PARKING ON WRONG SIDE OF STREET 9. CASE NO: SO 147661 OWNER: LEONA WARNEKE OFFICER: LT. GUNKLE VIOLATIONS: ORD. SEe. 130-67 HANDICAP PARKING VIOLATION 10. CASE NO: SO 136153 OWNER: DOROTHY VERRASTRO OFFICER: LEEANN WHITNEY VIOLATIONS: ORD. SEC. 130-66 UNLA WFUL AREA VIOLATION 11. CASE NO: SO 140270 OWNER: VINCENT COSMI OFFICER: DEP. BOYLAN VIOLATIONS: ORD. SEe. 130-66(1)(H) FIRE LANE VIOLATION 12. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 13. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 14. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 15. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 16. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 17. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 18. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 19. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: ,.------ SO 145006 RAY MORGAN DEP. FAULKS ORD. SEe. 130-67 HANDICAP PARKING VIOLATION SO 137556 HILARIO GONZALEZ DEP. PARENTEAU ORD. SEe. 130-67 HANDICAP PARKING VIOLATION SO 139462 HA YDEE LARRALDE DEP. COCHRAN ORD. SEe. 130-67 HANDICAP PARKING VIOLATION SO 141107 TERRY MILLER DEP. BRADLEY ORD. SEe. 130-67 HANDICAP PARKING VIOLATION (ACCESS AREA) CE 0698 TOMMIE ALZAMORA JEAN NEADEAU ORD. SEe. 130-66 UNLAWFUL AREA VIOLATION CE 0699 TOMMIE ALZAMORA JEAN NADEAU ORD. SEC. 130-66 UNLAWFUL AREA VIOLATION CE 0421 WILLIAM AMANTIA RONALD MARTINDALE ORD. SEC. 130-66 UNLA WFUL AREA VIOLATION CE 0744 DA WN LEBLANC EVERILDO YBACET A ORD. SEe. 130-66 UNLA WFUL AREA VIOLATION 20. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 21. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: CE 0337 NORMAN ERICKSON SONDRA DINICOLA ORD. SEe. 130-66 UNLA WFUL AREA VIOLATION 2004070513 SHADI OF NAPLES, INe. - MAKSUDAR RAHMAN, MD. REG AGENT ANDREW WUHRER SECTIONS 10.07.00, 1O.02.06(B)(2)(A) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED UNAPPROVED CANOPY COLOR & CANOPY WITHOUT PERMIT 22. CASE NO: 2005010906 OWNER: CROSSROADS MARKET, INe. - ANTHONY CATALANO, REG. AGENT OFFICER: ROBERT CRUZ VIOLATIONS: 23. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 24. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 25. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 26. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 27. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: --_.,. SECTION 5.06.06(C)(2) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED W ALGREENS SIGN WITHOUT PERMIT 2005030931 VICTORIA UBER JOHN SANT AFEMIA SECTION 2.01.00(A) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED TWO UNLICESNSED VEHICLES IN DRIVEWAY 2005040615 PETER e. AMIDON TR. UTD 5-9-91 ROBERT MANGIANTE SECTIONS 7(2) OF ORDINANCE 2004-58 FAILURE TO REGISTER RENTAL PROPERTY 2005040098 JUAN JOSE ABASOLO ROBERT MANGIANTE SECTIONS 1O.02.06(B)(1)(A)/(B)(1)(D)(I) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED GARAGE CONVERTED INTO LIVING SPACE 2005020112 FRANK LAGONIGRO RONALD MARTINADALE SECTION 5 OF ORDINANCE 2003-37 FAILED CULVERT PIPE 2003100457 JULIA GONZALEZ SHA WN LUEDTKE SECTIONS 1O.02.06(B)(1)(A)/(B)(1)(D) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED INTERIOR RENOVATIONS WITHOUT PERMITS 28. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 29. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 30. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 31. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 32. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 33. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 34. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 35. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLA TIONS: '-"-.-'-----" 2005030527 MARTHA HETZEL & LA DONA SUE BYERS SHA WN LUEDTKE SECTIONS 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORDINANCE 99-51 WEEDS OVER 18" AND LITTER 2003021010 WELLS FARGO BANK - ED V ANSKYVER, MGR. SHAWN LUEDTKE SECTION 6(9, 11, 12A, 12C, 12P AND 12Q) OF ORDINANCE 2004-58 INTERIOR FIRE DAMAGE 2005010460 WILLIAM & LOLA OVERTON JOSEPH THOMPSON SECTION 1.04.01 OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED GUEST HOUSE BEING UTILIZED FOR LIVING SPACE 2005020443 RAFAEL MORALES & JUANA PEREZ JOSEPH THOMPSON SECTION 10.02.06(B)(1)(A) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED SECTION 104.1.1 OF ORDIANCE 2002-01 AMENDED THE FBC GARAGE CONVERTED INTO LIVING SPACE 2005020681 JESUS & MICHELLE HERRERA FOR LEO JR. LAWN & IRRIGATION SERVICE, INC. JOSEPH THOMPSON SECTION 1.04.01 OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED ILLEGAL LAND USE - SITE USED FOR BUSINESS WITHOUT SIP 2005030605 JOSE ORTEGA EVERILDO YBACET A SECTION 7 OF ORDINANCE 1999-51 LITTER VIOLATION 2004060665 JEAN CLAUDE MARTEL EVERILDO YBACET A SECTION 7 OF ORDINANCE 1999-51 LITTER VIOLATION 2005020181 SAINT LOUISE MOISE EVERILDO YBACET A SECTION 7 OF ORDINANCE 1999-51 LITTER VIOLATION 36. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 37. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 38. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 39. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLA TIONS: 40. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 41 CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 42. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 43. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 2005020799 AUGUST & KA THLEEN VALENTA LARRY SCHWARTZ SECTIONS 1O.02.06(B)(1)(A)/(B)(1)(D) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED GARAGE CONVERTED INTO LIVING SPACE 2005020091 JACK & MURIEL FLOYD LARRY SCHWARTZ SECTION 6 OF ORDINANCE 1999-51 LITTER VIOLATION 2005020092 JACK & MURIEL FLOYD LARRY SCHWARTZ SECTION 6 OF ORDINANCE 1999-51 LITTER VIOLATION 2004120006 WILLIAM & DAWN CSOGI JOHN OLNEY SECTIONS 1O.02.06(B)(1)(A)/(B)(1)(D)(I) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED SECTIONS 104.1.1, 105.1 AND 106.1.2 OF ORDINANCE 2002-01 AMENDING THE FBC CONSTRUCTION OF ARBOR-LIKE STRUCTURE WITHOUT PERMITS 2005010536 MARTIN & LOUISIANA MENA JOHN OLNEY SECTIONS 2.01.00(B) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED BOAT PARKED IN SIDE YARD 2004070464 GARY & ANGELA SANCH JOHN OLNEY SECTIONS 2.7.6.A AND 2.7.6.5.A OF ORDINANCE 91-102 AS AMENDED SECTIONS 104.1.1, 105.5 AND 106.1.2 OR ORDINANCE 2002-01 AMENDING THE FBC 2004020181 FATMA CAGRAN JOHN OLNEY SECTIONS 2.7.6.A AND 2.7.6.5 OF ORDINANCE 91-102 AS AMENDED SECTIONS 1O.02.06(B)(1)(A)/(B)(1)(D) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED 2005010687 AL'D F. FAYARD, JR. JOHN OLNEY SECTIONS 1.04.01 AND 2.02.03 OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED UNLICENSED AND INOPERABLE VEHICLES/TRAILERS, BARRELS, ETe. 44. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 45. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLA TIONS: 46. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 47. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 48. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 49. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLA TIONS: 50. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 51. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: 2005020677 JOANNE DAVIDSON TURNER JOHN OLNEY SECTION 2.01.00(A) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED SEVERAL UNLICENSED VEHICLES IN DRIVEWAY 2005010143 MICHAEL J. MICELLI JOHN OLNEY SECTIONS 1O.02.06(B)(1)(A)/(B)(1)(D) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED SECTIONS] 04.].1 OF ORDINANCE 2002-0] AMENDING THE FBC INTERIOR RENOVATIONS WITHOUT PERMITS 2004040270 ANN CHAMBERLAIN JOHN OLNEY SECTIONS 2.7.6.A AND 2.7.6.5.A OF ORDINANCE 91-102 AS AMENDED SCREEN ENCLOSURE CONVERTED INTO LIVING SPACE WITH PERMITS 2005020961 MICHAEL D. RYON JOHN OLNEY SECTIONS 2.01.00(A) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED AS AMENDED SEVERAL UNLICENSED VEHICLES IN DRIVEWAY 2005030121 MICHAEL D. RYON JOHN OLNEY SECTION 7 OF ORDINANCE 2004-58 F AlLURE TO REGISTER RENTAL PROPERTY 2005020698 NAPLES SOUTH REALTY - ZACH BERG, REG. AGENT JOHN OLNEY SECTION 5.03.04(E) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED DUMPSTER WITHOUT REQUIRED SCREENING 2004080776 ENDLESS SUMMER ESTATES, LLLP - HAROLD REGAN, REG. AGENT LARRY METTET AL JOHN OLNEY SECTIONS 1O.02.06(B)(1)(A)/(B)(1)(D)(I) OF ORDINANCE 2004-41 AS AMENDED SECTIONS 104.1.1 AND 106.1.2 OF ORDINANCE 2002-01 AMENDING THE FBC PATIO ENCLOSURE WITHOUT PERMIT 2004080900 GEORGE & ELIZABETH SYROVY JOHN OLNEY SECTION 7 OF ORDINANCE 2004-58 FAILURE TO REGISTER RENTAL PROPERTY 3. COMMENTS 4. NEXT MEETING DATE JUNE 3, 2005 5. ADJOURN May 6, 2005 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Special Master Brenda Garretson at 8:47 AM. All those testifying did so under oath. Hearing Rules and Procedures: Leonardo Bonanno, Secretary to the Special Master The following changes to the Agenda were noted and recorded as follows: 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. MOTIONS Motion for rehearing - BCC vs. Edwin Watts Golf - Case CO 2004090845 1. Motions for Continuance 1. BCC vs. Frank Lagonigro - 2005020112 - Motion Granted _ Case Removed. 2. BCC vs. William Careccia - SO 132772 - Case Settled - Motion and Case. 3. BCC vs. Norman Erickson - CE 0337 4. BCC vs. Gary & Angela Sanch - 2004070464 Other cases resolved and removed from Agenda are: · Item #11 - Case - SO 140270 - BCC vs. Vincent Cosmi · Item #12 - Case - SO 145006 - BCC vs. Ray Morgan The cases removed from the Agenda required no action by the Special Master. 8:54 AM - Special Master Brenda Garretson at this time gave the Defendants time to speak with their issuing Officer before conducting the Hearing for settlement to be made if possible. 9:06 AM - Reconvened - Cases resolved and removed from the Agenda are as follows: · Item #13 - Case SO 137556 - BCC vs. Hilario Gonzalez - Resolved and paid $40 for handicap parking violation at today's hearing. · Item #7 - Case SO 134265 - BCC vs. Marc Schnee - Resolved and removed from Agenda. · Item #16 - CE 0698 & #17 CE 0699 - BCC vs. Tommie Alzamora _ Resolved and paid $60 total for unlawful area violation. Motion for Re-Hearing before the Special Master - BCC vs. Edwin Watts Golf _ Case CO 2004090845 - The Investigator was present. Special Master Garretson stated they have asked for reconsideration. She asked the Investigator obtain a legal opinion from the County Attorney On the issues raised by the Defendant. The Request for Re- Hearing will be ruled upon at the June 3, 2005 Hearing. 2 May 6, 2005 Motion for Continuance - Item #26 - BCC vs. Frank Lagonigro - Case 2005020112 Based on Defendant claims recent hip surgery prevents him from attending today's Hearing. Based on these facts, Special Master Garretson GRANTED a Continuance to the June 3rd Hearing. Motion for Continuance - Item #20 - BCC vs. Norman Erickson - Case CE 0337 Issuing Officer Dinicola was present. The Continuance was DENIED being no reason stated from the Defendant for the continuance. Motion for Continuance - Item #41 - BCC vs. Gary & Angela Sanch _ Case 2004070464 - Investigator John Olney was present. Investigator Olney stated he has not had contact with the Defendants. Mr. & Mrs. Sanch have recently retained legal counsel, who requested this continuance. Based on these facts, Special Master Garretson GRANTED a Continuance to the June 3rd Hearing. The Continuance was GRANTED until the June 3rd Hearing. 2. Motion for Order 1. BCC vs. Norman Bell - CE 0731 - Special Master Garretson viewed the site herself. Mr. Bell had explained his property was pie shaped _ being narrower in the back and the need to park his vehicles on the right-of-way. In viewing the site, Special Master Garretson explained Mr. Bell has plenty of room in the front of his property. He has two places to park, but someone has chosen to place numerous plants in one place. She also noted an abandoned van covered with vines. There is enough room for a vehicle in front of the home. To the left ofthe driveway is a utility right-of-way making it dangerous for Mr. Bell to park in that area and is also on a curve. That part of the road is extremely wide. She saw no problems that Mr. Bell related at the previous hearing. The Defendant was found GUILTY and ordered to pay afine of$30 and Operational Costs of $50 was imposed. B. HEARINGS 1. Case SO 146799 - BCC vs. Crah! Bartholow This hearing was requested by the Defendant who was present. Bill Helms, Sheriffs Officer was present. The Defendant explained his reasons for parking in a handicap parking area. He admitted he made a wrong decision. He asked for a warning or reduction in fine. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance Sec. 130-67, Handicap Parking Violation. The Defendant was ordered to pay the fine of $250 and Operational Costs of $50. 2. Case SO 146425 - BCC vs. Stuart McFetrid!!e 3 May 6, 2005 This hearing was requested by the Defendant who was not present, but submitted a letter. Bill Helms, Sheriffs Officer was present. March 29,2005 Deputy Helms found vehicle parked in the Handicap access in the Walgreen's parking lot in the Berkshire Commons. According to Mr. McFetridge's letter, he did not feel he interfered with the parking spot. He parked in the crosswalk beside the Handicap parking area. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance Sec. 130-67, Handicap Parkblg Violation. The Defendant was ordered to pay the fine of $250 and Operational Costs of $50. 4. Case SO 133474 - BCC vs. Naples Nissan This hearing was requested by the Defendant. Michael Hurley, a lot attendant doing deliveries for Naples Nissan, was present. Donald Lothrop, Issuing Officer was present. A citation was written for a vehicle parking in front of the Government Administration Building in the fire lane. The Defendant stated he had been told by the Tax Collector's office pennission had been granted to park in that area for deliveries. Robin Sizemore, Supervisor for Motor Vehicle Dept., from the Tax Collector's office, was in attendance on another issue and related the fire lane in front ofthe Tax Collectors office is used for inspections of out-of-state vehicles and stated the assumption was that the dealers can park there also. Officer Lothrop stated the Defendant was parked further down by the mailboxes. The Defendant stated there were vehicles parked in front of the Tax Collectors office so he parked further down. An employee of Naples Nissan infonned the Defendant she had been told by the Tax Collectors office it was alright to park in that area. Adjudication was withheld in this case in light of its circumstances. Mr. Bonanno was asked to contact the Sheriffs Office and Tax Collectors Office to establish a policy to follow in the future. 5. Case SO 245152 - BCC vs. Juan Acevedo This hearing was requested by the Defendant who was not present. Lawrence Keller, Issuing Officer was present. A truck was partially parked in the access area at Sam's Club, finding it difficult for anyone to park in the Handicapped area. Photos of the area and Defendants truck were shown. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 130-67, Handicap Parking Violation. The Defendant was ordered to pay a fine of $250 and Operational Costs of $50. 4 May 6, 2005 6. Case SO 145197 - BCC vs. Marv Ann Williams This hearing was requested by the Defendant who was not present. (A letter ffom her attorney was received along with colored copies of her placard) Lawrence Keller, Issuing Officer was present. Officer Keller was patrolling at the Hollywood Theatre and noticed a handicap placard that looked like the date had been tapered with. The Defendant was found NOT GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 130-67. 7. Case SO 135557 - BCC vs. Robin Sizemore This hearing was requested by the Defendant, who was present. Deputy Lapiere, Issuing Officer, was present. On March 29,2005 a ticket was given for parking in an unlawful parking area at the Government Complex. Since that time, it has been designated a parking area. He quoted part of the County Ordinance concerning parking areas. He noted it is also on a drainage area and was concerned about flooding. The Defendant has parked there for some tirne and had never been told it was an illegal parking area. There seems to be some confusion on the area. Photos of the area were shown. Deputy Lapiere stated Mr. Skip Camp, Facilities Manager, is going to address the parking situation at the Government Complex. There were no yellow markings designated in the area. Deputy Lapiere suggested dismissing the case due to the circumstances of the situation. The Defendant was found NOT GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 130-66. Mr. Bonanno was asked to contact Mr. Camp for direction on the parking situation. 9. Case SO 147661 - BCC vs. Leona Warneke This hearing was requested by the Defendant, who was present. Lt. Gunkle, Issuing Officer was not present. Citation SO 147661 was DISMISSED. 10. Case SO 136153 - BCC vs. Dorothv Verrastro This hearing was requested by the Defendant, who was not present. Leeann Whitney, Issuing Officer was present. On March 27, 2005 found Defendant parked in an unlawful area in the Vanderbilt Beach parking lot with 3 "No Parking Signs" in clear view. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly given and received, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 130-66, Unlawful Area Violation. The Defendant was ordered to pay afine of$30 and Operational Costs of$50. 5 May 6, 2005 14. Case SO 139462 - BCC vs. Havdee Larralde This hearing was requested by the Defendant who was not present. Deputy Cochran, Issuing Officer, was present. On February 22,2005 a vehicle with no tag was parked in a clearly marked handicap parking area in River Reach. No placard or tag was observed in view. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly given and received, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 130-67. The Defendant was ordered to pay afine of $250 and Operational Costs of $50. 15. Case SO 141107 - BCC vs. Jerrv Miller This hearing was requested by the Defendant, who was present. Deputy Bradley, Issuing Officer was present. On March 23,2005 Deputy Bradley noticed a vehicle parked in a handicap access area by Home Depot. After trying to locate the owner, the Deputy did notice a handicap placard in the vehicle. The Defendant pleaded guilty with an explanation. He was hoping the Special Master would be sympathetic as he had surgery on his back and had difficulty walking. The Officer was willing to have the fine reduced to $30. The Deputy and the Defendant present a stipulation of a guilty fee with a reduction in fines to $30. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinan ce 130-67 as stated in citation SO 141107. Thefine was reduced to $30 due to the circumstances of this case. Operational Costs were waived by Mr. Bonanno. 18. Case CE 0421 - BCC vs. William Amantia This hearing was requested by the Defendant who was not present but submitted written testimony. Ronald Martindale, Code Enforcement Investigator was present. On March 16, 2005 a citation was issued for a vehicle found parked on 11 Oth Ave. North - blocking a view of an exit of a local shopping center. Over 40 citations have been written in that area. In the Defendant's letter he related his wife's car was parked across the street from his house because a UPS truck was parked half across their driveway. They stated they have called Code Enforcement because previously others have parked in their driveway. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 130-66, unlawful area violation. The Defendant was ordered to pay afine of$30 and Operational Costs of$50. 6 ...----....-- ------.--, May 6, 2005 19. CE 0744 - BCC vs. Dawn Leblanc This hearing was requested by the Defendant who was not present. Mr. Bonanno spoke with her but did not receive a reply. Everildo Ybaceta, Code Enforcement Investigator was present. Multiple violations were found in the area of Franklin and Tamiami Trail between Rooms to Go and Best of Everything. Pictures were shown of other vehicles parked in the right-of-way. Have been many accidents with over 100 tickets issued within the last two months. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly given and received, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 130-66 and ordered to pay afine of$30 and Operational Costs of $50. 20. Case CE 0337 - BCC vs. Norman Erickson This hearing was requested by the Defendant who was present. Sondra Dinicola, Code Enforcement Investigator was present. On April 16, 2005 a citation was issued for a gold Mazda that was parked in the right-of- way. The Defendant stated he did not know the lawn in front of his house was the right-of- way. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 130-66 and ordered to pay a fine of $30 and Operational Costs of $50. BREAK - 10:40 AM RECONVENED - 11 :02 AM 21. Case 2004070513 - BCC vs. Shadi of Naples. Inc. - Maksudar Rahman. MD Ree:istered Ae:ent This hearing was requested by Andrew Wuhrer, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant, President and Owner of the Company, was present. This case started in July 2004 and entails a canopy and sign color with permits. Calls have been made to the sign company and they stated the problems will be corrected. As of March 28,2005 no permits had been obtained. Gary Hicks, with International Sign Company, has agreed the problem will be taken care of within 60 days. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sections 2.02.03, 10.01.00, 10.02.06 (B) (2) (A) of2004-41 as amended. The Defendant was ordered to obtain a Certificate of Completion for the canopy by July 6, 2005, and a Certificate of Completion for the Ground Sign by November 6, 2005 or a fine of $50 a day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of $230. 46 was also imposed. 7 ~'-~"'--- -"..,~-_.<-~ May 6, 2005 22. Case 2005010906 - BCC vs. Crossroads Market. Inc. - Anthonv Catalano. Re2:istered A2:ent This hearing was requested by Robert Cruz, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was not present. Upon checking a Walgreen's sign at the Crossroads Market, it was found the pennit had been canceled. Notice of Violation was sent. Contact had been made initially, but no pennits have been applied for to date. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 5.06.06(C) (2) and 10.02.06 of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended and ordered to obtain a permit by May 23rd, 2005 and complete the process by July 21, 2005 with obtaining a Certificate of Completion or afine of $50 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of $1 06.44 were imposed and to be paid by July 21, 2005. 23. Case 2005030931 BCC vs. Victoria Uber This hearing was requested by John Santafemia, Code Enforcement Investigator. The Defendant was not present. On March 18, 2005 a complaint was received concerning trash cans at the curb, unlicensed vehicles and a possible rental violation at 3018 42nd St. SW in Golden Gate City. A site inspection was done with no contact made. During the month of April, several site inspections were made without contact, the trash cans had been removed, but another unlicensed vehicle was on the property. Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served; the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 2.01.00 (A) of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended. The Defendant was ordered to obtain valid license plates for all vehicles, store them in an enclosed building, or remove them from the property by May 17, 2005 or a fine of $100 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. The Defendant is to notify Investigator Santafemia when the violations have been abated. Operational Costs of $116.69 were also imposed. 24. 2005040615 BCC vs. Peter C. Amidon Tr. Utd 5-9-91 This hearing was requested by Robert Mangiante, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant, Peter Amidon was present. The Defendant failed to register rental property stating it is not his property but his son's held in a Trust. According to the Tax Collector's office the owner is of the property is Peter Amidon. The Defendant, Peter Amidon, responded the property has been in the Trust for 13 years under the Trust, but has not been recorded as of yet as a credit rating is an issue. He 8 --... May 6, 2005 stated his Attorney, Doug Rankin advised him it is not a rental. The SOn is taking the mortgage for the home as a deduction on his income taxes. A letter and other legal papers were examined by Special Master Garretson in which none referred to the land in question. After review, a document entitled "Disposition of Tangible Personal Property" pursuant to Florida Statute 732.515 was found to be invalid as parts of it state the house and land are tangible personal property. (Cannot transfer real property by something labeling it as tangible personal property) The letter states Peter Amidon is the Owner ofthe property in question. If the property is occupied by someone other than the owner, it needs to be registered as rental property. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sections 7 (2) of Ordinance 2004-58 and ordered to come into compliance by Monday, May 9,2005 or afine of $50 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter starting from April 14, 2005. The Defendant will Transfer the Property or fill out the Relltal Registration for $30 by May 9,2005; or file all appeal through the circuit court. Operational Costs of $111.55 were imposed. 25. Case 2005040098 BCC vs. Juan Jose Abasolo This hearing was requested by Robert Mangiante, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was also present. Anna Garcia was translating. This is a second offense of converting his garage into living quarters. Paperwork was reviewed. A $500 immediate fine was recommended. The Defendant stated the dwelling is framed and almost finished - just needs two outlets and wants to comply, but can't afford to pay $500. The Defendallt wasfoulld GUILTY of Ordillan ce see 10.02.06 (B) ofOrdillance 2004- 41 as amended alld ordered to pay afine of$250 by June 6, 2005 and obtain the proper permits; inspectiolls and Certificate of Completion by JUlie 6, 2005 or a fille of $1 00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of$111.55 were also imposed to be paid by June 6, 2005. 27. Case 2003100457 - BCC vs. Julia Gonzalez This hearing was requested by Shawn Luedtke, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was not present. This is a permitting issue with conversion of interior of house. Posted Notice of Hearing and have abated the violation. All permits and Certificate of Occupancy has been obtained. 9 ._~., ---'----...~._-~., ". '~._---".~'" ".- May 6, 2005 Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served the Defendant was to have been in violation prior to this hearing, but has since come into compliance. Operational Costs of$194.31 were imposed to be paid by June 6,2005. 28. Case 2005030527 - BCC vs. Martha Hetzel and LaDona Sue Bvers This hearing was requested by Shawn Luedtke, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendants were also present. Both owners agreed to stipulate to the violation of weeds and litter on the property. The Defendants responded they will take care of the violation. The Defendants were found GUILTY of Ordinance sections 6, 7 and 11 of Ordinance 99-51 and ordered to come into compliance by clearing the litter and weeds from the property by June 6, 2005 or a fine of $50 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of $1 06.22 were also imposed. 29. Case 2005030527 - BCC vs. Wells Fanw Bank - Ed Vanskvver. Mt!r. This hearing was requested by Shawn Luedtke, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was also present. Investigator Luedtke responded there was a stipulation with obtaining pennits for renovation and a Certificate of Occupancy. This case involves Fire Damage to the interior ofthe property located at 4465 19th Avenue SW. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 6 (9,11,12, of Ordinance 2004- 58 as amended and accepted the stipulation as stated by Investigator Luedtke which is to obtain a Demolition permit or building permit to repair by August 6, 2005 or a fine of $1 00 a day will be imposed every day thereafter. Defendant must obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Completion by May 6, 2005 or a fine of $1 00 a day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of $324.57 were imposed. 30. Case 2005010460 - BCC vs. William and Lola Overton This hearing was requested by Joseph Thompson, Code Enforcernent Investigator, who was present. The Defendants were also present. The Defendants have agreed to a stipulation of removing the plumbing and air- conditioning improvements and have the electrical improvements pennitted in accordance to FEMA's requirements. The Defendants were found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 1.04.01 of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended and ordered to come into compliance by removing of the plumbing and 10 "<._c ~'_'^~'_._"~O<._. _. May 6, 2005 air-conditioning improvements by July 6, 2005 and have the electrical permitted according to FEMA's requirements and Certificate of Completion by July 6, 2005, or a fine of $50 a day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of$182.19 were also imposed. The Defendants will be in contact with Investigator Thompson when the violations are abated. 31. Case 2005020443 - BCC vs. Rafael Morales and Juana Perez This hearing was requested by Joseph Thompson, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendants were not present. The violation is a garage converted to living space without required permits. The Defendants were present this morning, but had to leave before their case was heard. Investigator Thompson claimed that a stipulation had been reached between the parties and he presented that arrangement. Investigator Thompson stated he had given 30 days to apply for permits, get inspections and Certificate of Occupancy for the conversion of garage into living space. The Defendant agreed to the stipulation through a translator. The Notice of Hearing was properly served as the Defendant was in attendance earlier and needed to leave for her place of employment. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 10.02.06 (B) (1) (A) of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended secs. 104.1.1 and 105.5 of Ordinance 2002-01 amended the FBC. The Defendant was ordered to obtain the proper permits, inspections and Certificate of Occupancy by June 6, 2005 or afine of$50 a day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of $143.75 were also imposed. 32. 2005020681- BCC vs. Jesus & Michelle Herrera for Leo Jr. Law & Irri2ation Service. Inc. This hearing was requested by Joseph Thompson, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendants were present. (Mike Landy - assisting Michelle Herrera) The violation in this case is illegal land use, with the operation of this company being conducted at 183 Price Street without the required Site Improvement Plan. Agreed to a Stipulation - a Site Improvement Plan application needs to be done within 30 days and completed within 90 days. The Defendants were found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 1.04.01 of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended and ordered to submit a the Site Improvement Plan by June 6, 2005 and be completed and approved by August 6, 2005 or a fine of $50 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of $138. 04 were also imposed. BREAK-12:10 PM 11 . _.^..,...._._--_.~- May 6, 2005 RECONVENED - 12:25 PM 33. Case 2005030605 - BCC vs. Jose Orteea This hearing was requested by Everildo Ybaceta, Code Enforcement Investigator who was present. The Defendant was not present. No contact has been made with Jose Ortega, the owner. The tenant was issued a Notice of Violation and also mailed to the owner. Return receipt has been received, but no COntact has been made with the Defendant. Pictures of the abundant amount of debris and litter were shown. Finding the Notice of Violation was properly sent the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 6 & 7 of Ordinance 1999-51 and ordered to remove all litter by June 7, 2005 or a fine of $150 a day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. If the violation exists after June 7, 2005, the County may hire a Contractor to abate the violation. These costs would be assessed to the property owner. Operational Costs of$104.42 were also imposed. 34. Case 2004060665 BCC vs. Jean Clause Martel This hearing was requested by Everildo Ybaceta, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was also present. The case involves litter at 3000 Karen Drive, Naples. The Defendant has agreed to clean his property oflitter on Karen Drive. Pictures of the area were shown into evidence. The Defendant responded it is 98% clean now. He claims the litter is from others and owns 7 other properties. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinan ce sec. 7 of Ordinance 1999-51 and was ordered to come into compliance by cleaning the litter by May 16,2005 or pay afine of $150 a day will be imposed for every day the violation remains thereafter. The Defendant will contact the Investigator Ybaceta when the violation is abated. Operational Costs of $152. 29 were imposed and ordered to be paid by May 16,2005. 35. Case 2005020181 - BCC vs. Saint Louise Moise This hearing was requested by Everildo Ybaceta, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was present. Pictures were shown of litter and debris on the property. A storage shed had been built illegally and tom down, therefore an abundant amount of lumber on the property. As of April 22, 2005 the litter remained. 12 _._--,.,_..,._......_~-_. May 6, 2005 The Defendant responded most of it is cleaned up and removed and wishes to apply for the proper pennits to rebuild the shed. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 7 of Ordinance 1999-51 and ordered to remove the litter from the property and stack the wood neatly by May 16, 2005 or pay afine of$150 will be imposed for everyday the violation remains thereafter. If the violation exists after June 7, 2005, the County may hire a Contractor to abate the violation. These costs would be assessed to the property owner. Operational Costs of $115.77 were also imposed. 36. Case 2005020799 - BCC vs. AU2:ust & Kathleen Valenta This hearing was requested by Larry Schwartz, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was also present. The Violation in this case is a garage converted to living area without required pennits. A Stipulation was agreed upon by the Defendant to obtain a Demolition or Certificate of Occupancy pennit by June 21,2005. The Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinan ce sec. 10.02.06 (B)(J)(A)(B)(l)(D) of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended and ordered to obtain all permits (Building or Demolition) and process through a Certificate of Occupancy/Completion by August 6, 2005 or a fine of $1 00 a day will be imposed for every day the violation remains thereafter. The Defendant will notifY Investigator Schwartz when the violation has been abated and proper permits obtained. Operational Costs of $133.73 were also imposed. 37. 2005020091- BCC vs. Jack & Muriel Flovd 38. 2005020092 - BCC vs. Jack & Muriel Flovd This hearing was requested by Larry Schwartz, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendants were present but left before their case was heard. Both cases involve excessive litter. Case 2005020091 location is 11466 Laertes Lane. Case 2005020092 location is 11444 Laertes Lane. A Stipulation was agreed upon with the Defendants to come unto compliance with the litter violation by removing and disposing of it. The Defendants had received the Notice of Hearing and were present earlier agreeing to the Stipulation. The Defendants were found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 6 of Ordinance 1000-51 in both cases and ordered to come into compliance by removing all litter by June 21,2005 or a $75 fine imposed for every day the violation remains thereafter. The Defendant will notifY Investigator Schwartz when the violation has been abated. Operational Costs of$145.26for Case 2005020091 and $151.03 for case 2005020092 were also imposed. 13 -.--~".._> . May 6, 2005 39. 2005010536 BCC vs. William & Dawn Csol!i This hearing was requested by John Olney, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was present. The violation is the construction of an arbor-like structure without required permits. The Defendant has agreed to a Stipulation concerning the arbor-like structure and has obtained the "Express Permit" and will obtain the other document. The Defendant agreed to a Stipulation and was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 10.02.06 (B) of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended and secs. 104.1.1, 105.5 & 106.1.2 of Ordinance 2002-01 amending the FBC and ordered to apply for the required building permit by May 20, 2005, or a fine of $50 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains. The Certificate of Completion must be obtained by June 20, 2005 or a fine of $50 a day was imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of $121.44 were also imposed. The Defendant is to notify Investigator Olney when the violation is abated. 40. Case 2005010536 - BCC vs. Martin & Louisiana Mena This hearing was requested by John Olney, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendants were not present. The violation consists of a boat in the side yard at 2572 River Reach Drive. The Defendants were in attendance earlier and are in compliance with removing the boat from their property. Their mailing address is: 3819 Recreation Lane, Naples 34116. The Defendants agreed to a stipulation and were found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 2.01. 00 (B) of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended the violation having existed but now in compliance. Operational Costs of$110.10 were imposed to be paid by June 6, 2005. 42. 2004020181 - BCC vs. Fatima Cal!ran This hearing was requested by John Olney, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was present. The violation consists of remodeling without required permits. A stop work order was issued on the property of a Citgo Gas Station on Davis for remodeling. A Site Development Plan is needed in order to proceed. Defendant has agreed to a Stipulation of obtaining a SDP by May 20,2005. 14 May 6, 2005 The Defendant agreed to a Stipulation and was found GUILTY of Ordinance secs. 2.7.6.1 & 2.7.6.5 of Ordinance 91-102 as amended and Sec. 104.1.1, of Ordinance 2002-01 amending the FBC and ordered to apply for the Site Development Plan by May 20,2005 or a $50 a day fine was imposedfor every day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of$170.69 were also imposed. 43. Case 2005010687 - BCC vs. AI'D F. Favard. JR. This hearing was requested by John Olney, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was not present. The violation consists of several unlicensedlinoperable vehicles located at 90 I Airport Road South. Officer Olney testified that the property is in compliance as of today. Finding Notice of Hearing was properly sent, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 1.04.01 & 2.02.03 of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended butfound in compliance as of to day's proceedings. Operational Costs of$121.44 were imposed to be paid by June 6,2005. 44. Case 2005020677 - BCC vs. Joanne Davidson Turner This hearing was requested by John Olney, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was not present. This violation consists of several unlicensed vehicles. Investigator Olney testified that the Defendant claims to be having trouble licensing one of the vehicles because it is registered out of state. Investigator Olney stated that he spoke with the Defendant, who claims that the other vehicle will be tagged by Monday May 9,2005. Finding Notice of Hearing was properly sent, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended section 2.01.00 (A) by affIXing valid tags to both vehicles, removing both vehicles, or enclosing both vehicles in a completely enclosed structure by May 20, 2005 or a fine of $50 a day was imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of$103.53 were also imposed to be paid by May 20, 2005. 45. Case 2005010143 - BCC vs. Michael J. Micelli This hearing was requested by John Olney, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was not present. 15 May 6, 2005 The Defendant owns property at 4600 Gulf Stream Drive. An interior wall was constructed without required permits. Finding Notice of Hearing was properly sent; the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance 2004-41 sec. 10.02.06 and Ordinance 2002-01, sec. 104.1.1 and ordered to obtain a Demolition Permit, or a building permit on or before by May 20, 2005 or a fine of $1 00 a day was imposed for each day the violation remains. A Certificate of Completion/Occupancy must be obtained by June 20, 2005 or a fine of $100 a day was imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of$132. 79 was also imposed to be paid by May 20,2005. 46. Case 2004040270 - BCC vs. Ann Chamberlain This hearing was requested by John Olney, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was not present. The Violation consists of a screen enclosure converted into living space without required permits. Investigator Olney state that this violation has been abated as of today. Finding Notice of Hearing was properly given, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 2.7.6.1 & 2. 7.6.5.A of Ordinance 91-102 as amended but found to be in Compliance as of the date of these proceedings. Operational Costs of $222.64 were imposed to be paid by June 6, 2005. 47. Case 2005020961- BCC vs. Michael D. Rvon 48. Case 2005030121 - BCC vs. Michael D. Rvon This hearing was requested by John Olney, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was not present. The violation in case 2005020961 consists of several unlicensed/inoperable vehicles. The violation in case 2005030121 consists of the Defendant's failure to register several rental properties on Estey Ave. Investigator Olney testified that I of the 2 vehicles in violation in case 2005020961 has been properly tagged and is now incompliance Finding Notice of Hearing was properly given for Case 2005020961, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 2.01.00(A) of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended, and is ordered to license/remove/completely enclose the remaining vehicle, has brought one vehicle into compliance and has agreed to bring the other vehicle by May 13,2005, or afine of$75 a day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of$110.10 were also imposed. 16 "---"-'" May 6, 2005 Finding Notice of Hearing was properly given for Case 2005030121, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 7 of Ordinance 2004-58 and ordered to register all properties by May 13,2005, or afine of$75 a day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of$110.10 were also imposed. (Total Costs to be paid by June 6, 2005 = $220.20) 49. Case 2005020698 - BCC vs. Naples South Realty-Zach Ben!. Ref!istered Af!ent This hearing was requested by John Olney, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was not present. At Naples South Plaza, a trash dumpster was not screened on three sides according to Collier County Code. Investigator Olney testified that he has spoken to the Defendant who is in Miami, and he has stated it will be done in a week. Finding Notice of Hearing was properly given, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 5.03.04(E) of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended, and ordered to (1) enclose the dumpster in accordance with the Ordinance on or before May 16, 2005. (2) The Defendant must obtain the proper permits, if required, to complete the enclosure. Ifpermits are required, they must be obtained and processed through a Certificate of Completion by May 16, 2005. If Items 1 and 2 are not completed by May 16, 2005, a fine of $50 per day will be imposed for each day the violation(s) remain thereafter. Operational Costs of$110.10 was imposed and to be paid by June 6,2005. 50. Case 2004080776 - BCC vs. Endless Summer Estates. LLLP - Harold Ref!an. Ref!istered Af!ent - Larry Mettetal This hearing was requested by John Olney, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendant was not present and left before his case could be heard. The Defendant was cited for a violation of pennitting a screen enclosure beside a mobile home in the Summer Estates RV Park on Radio Road. It was also found the Defendant was also in violation for not pennitting the mobile home itself. Investigator Olney claimed that Mr. Mettetal was in attendance earlier and agreed to a Stipulation of applying for the proper pennits. Finding Notice of Hearing was properly given, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 10.02.06(B) of Ordinance 2004-41 as amended & secs. 104.1.1 & 104.1.3.5 & 106.1.2 of Ordinance 2002-01 amending the FBC and ordered to obtain all required permits for the mobile home and addition to the mobile home by June 2, 2005 or a fine of $50 will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. The Defendant was also ordered to obtain Certificates of Occupancy/Completion for all permits by July 2nd, 2005 or a fine of $50 will be imposed for each day the violation 17 --'.'-- May 6, 2005 remains thereafter. Operational Costs of$159.34 were imposed, to be paid by July 2, 2005. 51. Case 2004080900 - BCC vs. Geor2:e & Elizabeth Svrovv This hearing was requested by John Olney, Code Enforcement Investigator, who was present. The Defendants were not present. The Defendant failed to register rental property located at 6825 Grenadier Blvd. Notice of Violation was hand delivered to the Agent - Resort Quest/Naples Marco Accommodations. The property is a high rise on the gulf. The Defendant is out of State and has not come into compliance since August, 2004. Finding Notice of Hearing was properly given, the Defendant was found GUILTY of Ordinance sec. 7 of Ordinance 2004-58 and ordered to renew the rental registration by May 13, 2005 or a fine of $30 per day will be imposed for each day the violation remains thereafter. Operational Costs of $151.39 were imposed to be paid by June 6, 2005. 3. Comments: None 4. Next Meeting Date: June 3, 2005 ********** There being no further business for the good of the County, the Hearing was adjourned by order of the Special Master at 1 :38 PM. FOR THE COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MASTER Leonardo Bonanno, Secretary to the Special Master 18 ._-" ,····.."~·~---..._v_.