Agenda 05/10/2005 R
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA
May 10, 2005
9:00 AM
Fred W. Coyle, Chairman, District 4
Frank Halas, Vice-Chairman, District 2
Donna Fiala, Commissioner, District 1
Tom Henning, Commissioner, District 3
Jim Coletta, Commissioner, District 5
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO
SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE
PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED.
COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003-53, AS AMENDED REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS
SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE
BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT.
REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE
SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS
PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS."
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A
VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY
AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME
IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN.
IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO
PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE
PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112,
(239) 774-8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN
THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE.
LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M.
Page 1 of 10
1. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
A. Major Ron Smith, The Salvation Army
2. AGENDA AND MINUTES
A. Approval of today's regular, consent and summary agenda as amended. (Ex Parte
Disclosure provided by Commission members for summary agenda.)
B. April 6, 2005 - BCC/District 5 Town Hall Meeting
C. April 12, 2005 - BCC/Regular Meeting
3. SERVICE AWARDS: (EMPLOYEE AND ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS)
A. Advisory Committee Service Awards
1. Advisory Committee Service Awards
4. PROCLAMATIONS
A. Proclamation to designate the month of May, 2005 as Human Trafficking Awareness Month
and Zero Tolerance for Traffickers in Collier County. To be accepted by Lucas Benitez &
Laura Germino, Coalition of Immokalee Workers and Anna Rodriguez & Ana Alonso -
Immigrant Rights Advocacy Center.
B. Proclamation to designate the month of May, 2005 as Mental Health Month. To be accepted
by Petra Jones, Executive Director for Mental Health Association of Collier County, Inc.
C. Proclamation to designate the week of May 9 through May 14, 2005 as Salvation Army
Week. To be accepted by Major Ron Smith, Dr. Don Thomsen, Mr. David Brown, Mr. Henry
Caballero, Mr. Mel Forbis, and Mr. Herb Cambridge and Wanda Moore, of the Salvation
Army.
D. Proclamation to designate May 20,2005 as YMCA Project Graduation Day. To be accepted
by Mr. Brandon Dowdy, Executive Director for the Greater Naples YMCA.
E. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners issue a Proclamation
designating Friday, May 20, 2005 as Bike to Work Day in Collier County. To be accepted by
Norm Feder, Collier County Transportation Administrator, and Ted Litwin, Chairman for
Pathway Advisory Committee.
F. Proclamation to recognize the month of May, 2005 as Civility Month. To be accepted by
Collier County Attorney, David Weigel.
G. Proclamation to designate the month of May, 2005 as Public Service Recognition Month.
To be accepted by Jim Mudd, Collier County Manager, and Leo Ochs, Deputy County
Manager.
5. PRESENTATIONS
6. PUBLIC PETITIONS
A. Public Petition request by Keith Tompkins to discuss traffic signal on Collier Boulevard at
the Eagle Creek entrance.
Page 2 of 10
Item 7 and 8 to be heard no sooner than 1 :00 D.m.. unless otherwise noted.
7. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
8. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Public Hearing to consider Adoption of an Ordinance Establishing the Heritage Bay
Community Development District (CDD) pursuant to Section 190.005, Florida Statutes.
B. This item to be heard at 10:00 a.m. The petition was continued from the April 26, 2005 BCC
hearing at the applicants request. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and
ex-parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition: PUDA-2004-AR-6786
Vanderbilt Partners II, LLC, represented by Richard Yovanovich, of Goodlette, Coleman &
Johnson, P.A., requesting to amend the Cocohatchee Bay PUD document for the limited
purpose of amending the Bald Eagle Management Plan and related references in the
Planned Unit Development (PUD) document. The subject property, consisting of 532 acres,
is located in Sections 8,16,17 & 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,
Florida.
C. This item was continued from the April 12, 2005 BCC meeting and is requested to be
further continued to the June 28, 2005 BCC meeting. This item requires that all
participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493, Santa Barbara Landings PUD, requesting a rezone from Residential
Multiple-Family-6 (RMF-6) to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to be known
as the Santa Barbara Landings PUD for property located at the southeast corner of Radio
Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
D. This item was continued from the April 26, 2005 BCC Meeting. This item requires that all
participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.
PUDZ-2004-AR-6258, Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo Cove, Inc., represented by
Dwight Nadeau, of RWA, Inc., and Chuck Basinait, of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt,
P.A. requesting a rezone from the Agriculture zoning district to the Residential Planned
Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district to be known as Palermo Cove PUD, consisting of
131 acres and a maximum of 524 residential dwelling units. The property is located north
of Wolfe Road, west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Section 34, Township 48 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
E. This item to be heard at 4:00 p.m. Approve a Resolution authorizing the submission of a
low Interest State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan application to the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection for the construction of the Reclaimed Water Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Project, and to adopt the document called "Collier County Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Facilities Plan, March 2005" to allow the County to avail itself of a low-interest
SRF loan for this Project, 74030.
9. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A. Appointment of member to the Utility Authority.
B. Appointment of members to the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee.
C. Appointment of member to the Development Services Advisory Committee.
D. Appointment of members to the Educational Facilities Authority.
E. Appointment of members to the Health Facilities Authority.
Page 3 of 10
F. Appointment of members to the Industrial Development Authority.
G. Appointment of member to the Tourist Development Council.
10. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT
A. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ITEM WILL BE HEARD ON JUNE 7, 2005 AT 9:00 A.M.
Recommendation to conduct the Conservation Collier Annual Public meeting to provide
an update on the program's past activities, for soliciting proposals and applications, to
provide direction to staff for making procedural changes to the ordinance and to develop
an exceptional benefits ordinance. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community
Development & Environmental Services Division)
B. Recommendation to approve a Developers Contribution Agreement with Wal Mart, WCI
Communities, Inc., and Stone break Homes LLC to design and construct six lane
improvements on SR 951 from US 41 south to north of Henderson Creek in advance of and
as an extension to the County's current six laning project from US 41 to Davis Boulevard.
(Norman Feder, Administrator, Transportation Services)
C. Recommendation to adopt a Resolution authorizing the acquisition by Condemnation of
non-exclusive, perpetual utility and maintenance easements, temporary construction
easements, and access easements for the construction of a sewer force main, raw water
mains and well sites required for the South County Regional Water Treatment Plant
(SCRWTP) Reverse Osmosis Wellfield Expansion to 20MGD, Project Number 708921, at a
cost not to exceed $3,050,000. (Jim DeLony, Administrator, Public Utilities)
D. Recommendation to approve a budget amendment for $2,000,000 to pay the Agency for
Health Care Administration for the county's share of Medicaid Billing for a period of FY 00
through FY 05. (Marla Ramsey, Administrator, Public Services)
11. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
13. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS
14. AIRPORT AUTHORITY AND/OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
15. STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS
16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will
be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a
member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered
separately.
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
1. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of "Grand Lely Drive, Phase Two",
approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of
the amount of the performance security.
2. Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and drainage
improvements for the final plat of "Terracina at the Vineyards" The roadway and drainage
improvements will be privately maintained
Page 4 of 10
3. Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and drainage
improvements for the final plat of "Jubilation". The roadway and drainage improvements
will be privately maintained
4. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of "Black Bear Ridge - Phase I",
approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of
the amount of the performance security.
5. Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and drainage
improvements for the final plat of "Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen". The roadway and drainage
improvements will be privately maintained.
6. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of "Valencia Lakes Phase 7-A",
approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of
the amount of the performance security.
7. Recommendation to approve an Agreement for Sale and Purchase with John S. and Alberta
R. Fallowfield for 1.14 acre under the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program, at a
cost not to exceed $37,850.
8. Recommendation to name certain Acquired Conservation Collier Preserves.
9. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of "Aviano at Naples", approval of
the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of
the performance security.
10. Recommendation to approve a refund of the $1,000 continuance fees paid by Tabernacle of
Bethlehem Church for Petitions CU-2003-AR-4326 and VA-2003-AR-4327,Dieudonne and
Lunie Brutus, petitioners, represented by Ronald F. Nino, AICP, of Vanasse Daylor when
the petition was continued by the petitioner from a March 8, 2005 Board of County
Commissioners hearing date to March 22, 2005
11. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of "II Regalo", approval of the
standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the
performance security.
12. Recommendation to approve the Release and Satisfaction of Lien for the following cases:
Gladys Rodriquez, 2000-027; Helen Stormer, 2004-71; Keith T. Heckman, 2004-074; Barbara
Galloway, 2003035; Barbara Galloway, 2002-393; Barbara Galloway, 99-029; Barbara
Galloway, 2002-394; Barbara Galloway, 2003-385; Barbara Galloway, 2003-445; Erik H. &
Astrid V. Setter, 2581; Steve Riambau & Glldete Dasilva, 2567; Olga Hirshhorn & Thomas G.
Schessler, 2223; Olga Hirshhorn & Thomas G. Schessler, 2351; Aurora Bros., 1917; Aurora
Bros., 2275; Douglas & Sandra Carter, 40328-018; Aurora Bros., 2383; Douglas & Sandra
Carter, 2011; Douglas & Sandra Carter, 2121; Douglas & Sandra Carter, 1919; Douglas &
Sandra Carter, 1885; Bayshore Land Development LLC, 2556; Felix Lerch Family Trust,
70915-021; Felix Lerch Family Trust, 1674; Felix Lerch Family Trust, 1540: John D. Endres,
2453; Salvatore & Antionette Cavataio, 2590; Salvatore & Antionette Cavataio, 2535; Gary
Rookstool & Eleanor Porras, 1761; Gary Rookstool & Eleanor Porras, 51130-049; Caspian
Builders, LLC, 2231/2350; William D. Collins, III, Trustee, ITF Florida Sunbelt Mortgage Co.,
90-05-02297; Kelly Condon, 2413; William Mae Postelle, 2000-315; William Mae Postelle, 98-
410; Rene Damphier, SO 134810; Joseph Harrington, CO 2004091215; Michael Ryon, CO
2004081106; Amber-Lou Investments Co., CO 2004100765.
B. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
1. Recommendation to award Bid No. 05-3803 to Haskins, Inc. for construction of phase two
of the Immokalee and Fifth Street Drainage Improvement Project, Project Number 51725 in
the amount of $767,158.00.
2. Recommendation to approve a Work Order in the amount of $556,825.00 to Quality
Enterprises USA, Inc. for construction of the Westlake Outfall Improvements Project
(Project No. 510056), in accordance with the General Underground Utility Contract No. 04-
3535 and a budget amendment in the amount of $239,832.50.
Page 5 of 10
3. Recommendation to approve award of a construction contract with Quality Enterprises
USA, Inc. for Intersection improvements in the amount of $249,197.23 on Bluebill
Avenue/111th Avenue at Vanderbilt Drive, Bid No. 05-3797
4. Recommendation to approve a change order in the amount of $73,289.40 to Quality
Enterprises USA, Inc. amending the Pine Ridge Subdivision Emergency Culvert
Replacement Project (Project No. 510201) construction contract and to approve the
associated budget amendment including an additional $5,000.00 contingency amount.
5. Recommendation to allow the Transportation Division to advertise and receive bids for
proposed roadway and drainage improvements to Goodlette-Frank Road from Golden Gate
Parkway to Pine Ridge Road, Project No. 60005. Estimated fiscal impact is $12,000,000.
6. Recommendation to approve the Purchase Agreement and Accept the Warranty Deed for
the fee simple acquisition of property from Lori Hamilton, Successor Trustee of the TPJ,
Inc. Irrevocable Trust for the purpose of providing Wiggins Pass Outfall with an
unobstructed sheetflow of water in the area known as the Wiggins Bay Basin. Project
512122. ($186,525)
7. Recommendation to approve a Developer Agreement between Del Mar Retail Center, LLC
and The Board of County Commissioners providing for construction of and reimbursement
for a portion of the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project (Project No. 51101) in the
amount of $146,855.00.
8. Recommendation that the Board reject bid #05-3780 "Motorola Central Control Irrigation
Supplies and Services".
9. Recommendation to award RFP #05-3773 "Annual Contract for Roadway Contractors" to
the following contractors: Bonness, Inc.; Better Roads, Inc., and; Quality Enterprises USA,
Inc. (estimated annual amount $1,750,000)
C. PUBLIC UTILITIES
1. Recommendation to approve Work Orders UC-023 in the amount of $281,000 Kyle
Construction Incorporated for the system rehabilitation of the potable water system in the
Gulf Harbor area, Project Number 710102.
2. Recommendation to approve Work Orders UC-029 in the amount of $246,000 Kyle
Construction Incorporated for the system rehabilitation of the potable water system serving
Heron Avenue in the Naples Park area, Project Number 710102.
3. Recommendation to approve release of eight (8) Civil Judgments issued for litter against
Bruce Reed Schwartz deceased, in the amount of $4,000.00. Fiscal Impact is approximately
$148.00 to record the eight (8) Judgments.
4. Recommendation to award Contract 05-3783 "Fixed Term Geographic Information Systems
Services" to five (5) firms.
5. Recommendation to approve Work Order UC-104 under Contract 04-3535 in the amount of
$248,884.75 to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., for construction of the Collier County and City
of Naples Water System Interconnect at Davis Blvd., Project 70040.
D. PUBLIC SERVICES
1. Recommendation to approve McDonald's, Inc. as a sole source supplier of breakfast
sandwiches for the Summer Food Service Program, with an estimated Fiscal Year 2005
expenditure of $32,200.
2. Approve a modification in the amount of $9,345.90 to Purchase Order # 4500038389 with
Newspaper Printing Company, Inc. for printing of the Recreation Guide.
Page 6 of 10
3. Recommendation to approve Change Order #8 in the amount of $119,772 for additional
construction observation, permit modifications, and reimbursables for North Naples
Regional Park, Contract #992947.
4. Recommendation to approve a budget amendment to recognize and appropriate revenue of
$18,035 for Domestic Animal Services.
5. Recommendation to authorize rental of trucks from Enterprise Rent A Car at an estimated
cost of $40,000 for the transportation of food to recreation and school sites under the
Summer Food Grant Program.
E. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
1. Recommendation to approve a budget amendment to recognize revenues and appropriate
expenditures in the Purchasing Department budget.
2. Recommendation to approve conveyance of an Easement to Florida Power & Light
Company (FPL) in order for it to provide electric power to the new North Naples
Government Center, located on Orange Blossom Drive immediately west of the main
Library, at a cost not to exceed $18.50, Project Number 52534.
3. Recommendation to approve the utilization of State contracts for purchases of furniture
and floor coverings over twenty-five thousand dollars.
4. Report and ratify staff-approved change orders and changes to work orders to Board-
approved contracts.
F. COUNTY MANAGER
1. Recommendation to approve Change Order No.1 to Contract # 05-3753 with Snyder
Industries, Inc. for Maintenance Dredging of Wiggins Pass in the amount of $141,072.
2. Recommend approval of Change Order #1 for a $45,000 increase to Contract #01-3271 to
Work Order #HM-FT-05-03 to Humiston & Moore for additional construction monitoring
services for the Wiggins Pass dredging project 905221.
3. Recommendation to approve Amendment to 2004/2005 Tourism Agreement Between Collier
County and Paradise Advertising Agency, Inc. Regarding Emergency/Disaster Relief
Advertising Plan for $450,000 to be used for Emergency Advertising and Promotion
4. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners Approve the Purchase of a
Ford Tractor, Model TS115A from Landig Tractor Company, Inc. in the amount of $53,918.42
under Florida State Contract #765-900-04-1
G. AIRPORT AUTHORITY AND/OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1. This item continued from the April 26, 2005 BCC Meeting. Recommendation to approve
Contract Amendment A-2 involving Contract #03-3473 "Consultant Services for Preparation
of a Land Development Overlay for Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment
Area (CRA) District",
2. Approve a budget amendment for $161,000 to increase budgeted revenues and budgeted
expenses for the sale and purchase of aviation fuel at Marco Island Executive Airport.
3. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners and the Collier County
Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) adopt an Interlocal agreement between Collier
County and the CRA establishing policies for the CRA pertaining to purchasing, personnel,
contracting authority, and budgeting.
Page 7 of 10
H. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1. Commissioner Fiala requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function
serving a valid public purpose. Attended the Marine Corps League of Naples First Annual
Press Day Luncheon on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 at the Elks Lodge; $13.00 to be paid
from Commissioner Fiala's travel budget.
2. Commissioner Fiala requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function
serving a valid public purpose. Attended the 2005 Collier County Sand Dollar Awards &
Tourism Week Luncheon Celebration on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at the Naples Beach
Hotel & Golf Club; $22.00 to be paid from Commissioner Fiala's travel budget.
3. Commissioner Henning requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a
function serving a valid public purpose. Attend the 2005 Collier County Sand Dollar Awards
& Tourism Week Luncheon Celebration on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at the Naples Beach
Hotel & Golf Club; $22.00 to be paid from Commissioner Henning's travel budget.
4. Commissioner Coletta requests Board approval for payment for attending a function
serving a valid public purpose. Commissioner to attend the David Ellis's Farewell Function
on May 9,2005 at the Collier Building Industry Association's office. $10.00 to be
reimbursed from Commissioner Coletta's travel budget.
5. Commissioner Coletta requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function
serving a valid public purpose, Commissioner to attend the Economic Development
Council Membership Mixer hosted by Edison College on May 4, 2005 at Edison College
Collier Campus. $15.00 to be reimbursed from Commissioner Coletta's travel budget.
6. Commissioner Halas requests Board approval for payment for attending a function serving
a valid public purpose. Commissioner to attend the David Ellis's Farewell Function on May
9,2005 at the Collier Building Industry Association's office. $10.00 to be reimbursed from
Commissioner Halas' travel budget.
7. Commissioner Fiala requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function
serving a valid public purpose. Attended CBIA Executive Director, David Ellis' Going Away
Party on Monday, May 19, 2005 at CBIA Offices; $10.00 to be paid from Commissioner
Fiala's travel budget.
I. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE
1. Miscellaneous Items to File for Record with Action as Directed.
J. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS
1. Recommendation to approve a Resolution between the Board of County Commissioners
and Sprint Telephone Company of Florida.
2. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners make a determination of
whether the purchases of goods and services documented in the Detailed Report of Open
Purchase Orders opened from April 2, 2005 through April 15, 2005 serve a valid public
purpose and authorize the expenditure of County funds to satisfy said purchases. A copy
of the Detailed Report is on display in the County Manager's Office, Collier County
Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, 2nd Floor, W. Harmon Turner Building,
Naples, Florida.
Page 8 of 10
K. COUNTY ATTORNEY
1. Recommendation to Approve an Agreed Order for Payment of Expert Fees in Connection
with Parcel 180 in the Lawsuit Styled Collier County v. Big Corkscrew Island Fire District, et
al., Case No. 02-2218-CA (Immokalee Road Project #60018). Additional Cost to County is
$7,050.00.
2. Recommendation to Approve a Mediated Settlement Agreement and a Stipulated Final
Judgment to be Drafted Incorporating the Same Terms and Conditions as the Mediated
Settlement Agreement in the Amount of $13,250.00 for the Acquisition of Parcels 129 and
729 in the Lawsuit Styled Collier County v. Terry L. Lichliter, et al. Case No. 03-2273-CA
(Golden Gate Parkway Project No. 60027). Additional Cost to County is $7,281.00 after
Credit for Amount Deposited.
3. Recommendation for the Board of County Commissioners to Approve an Agreed Order for
Payment of Engineering Fees in the Amount of $3,200.00 in Connection with Parcels 131A
and 131B in the Lawsuit Styled Collier County v. Stonebridge Country Club Community
Association, Inc., et al., Case No. 04-3588-CA (Immokalee Road Project #66042).
4. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners Approve a Settlement and
Release With Respect to Certain Claims Made by Better Roads, Inc. in Connection with the
Work Under Contract No. 02-3413, i.e., Livingston Road Phase III- Pine Ridge Road to
Immokalee Road Project 62071.
5. Recommendation to Approve Settlement in the Lawsuit Entitled Rose Guinane vs. Collier
County Board of Commissioners Filed in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier
County, Florida, Case No. 03-2243-CA-THB, for $15,000.00.
6. Recommendation to Approve a Settlement Prior to Trial in the Lawsuit Entitled Nicholas
Marsit Jr., et al. vs. Collier County in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier
County, Florida, Case No. 03-1232-CA for $42,500.00 Plus Mediation Costs.
7. Recommendation for Approval of an Inter local Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release
between Collier County and the City of Naples in reference to Florida Department of
Administrative Hearings, Case No.04-1048GM and Second District Court of Appeal in
Lakeland, Florida, Case No. 2DCA# 2D05392.
17. SUMMARY AGENDA - THIS SECTION IS FOR ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MUST MEET
THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1) A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2)
UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION OR OTHER AUTHORIZU'~G AGENCIES OF ALL MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3)
NO WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE ITEM RECEIVED BY STAFF, THE COLLIER COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION, OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF THE BCC MEETING ON WHICH THE ITEMS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE
HEARD; AND 4) NO INDIVIDUALS ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE ITEM.
FOR THOSE ITEMS, WHICH ARE QUASI-JUDICIAL IN NATURE, ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST BE
SWORN IN.
A. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. VA-2005-AR-6983; Daniel and Gail Barthel, as agent and owners
requesting an after-the-fact variance from Section 2.07.00 and Section 4.02.22 of the Land
Development Code (LDC) for relief from the required front yard of 25 feet to allow a 3.3-
foot front setback and from the required side yard of 5 feet to a setback of 1.2 feet to
accommodate a shade trellis over a parking area, as shown on the survey. The subject
property is described as Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Block A, Lot 2,
Goodland Isles, Collier County, Florida, Plat Book 6, page 7.
Page 9 of 10
B. This Item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. PUDZ-A-2003-AR-3585,Wilson Boulevard Center LLC represented
by William L.Hoover, of Hoover Planning & Development, Inc., requesting a rezone from a
Planned nit Development (PUD) zoning district to a Commercial Planned Unit Development
(CPUD) zoning district known as the Wilson Boulevard Center PUD. the rezoning would
have the effect of amending the PUD Ordinance. A proposed change would allow the water
management area to be located within a portion of the 75-foot wide buffer along the
eastern and southern boundaries of the subject PUD. The property to be considered for
the rezone is located on the southeast corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson
Bouievard within a Neighborhood Center of Golden Gate Estates, in Section 10, Township
49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. this property consists of 7.15 acres.
C. Recommendation to adopt a Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Fiorida applying the Annual Mid-Cycle Indexing adjustments to amend the Water
and Sewer Impact Fee rate schedule, which is Schedule Two of Appendix A of Chapter 74
of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated
Impact Fee Ordinance No. 2001-13, as amended) and providing for an effective date of
June 1, 2005
D. This item has been withdrawn. Public Hearing to consider Adoption of an Ordinance
establishing the Napoli Community Development District (CDD) pursuant to Section
190.005, Florida Statutes.
18. ADJOURN
INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY
MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 774-8383.
Page 10 of 10
AGENDA CHANGES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
Mav 10, 2005
Add Item 4H: Proclamation declaring the month of May 2005 as Internal
Auditor Awareness Month. (Staff's request.)
Continue Item 8A to the Mav 24. 2005 BCC Meetinq: Public Hearing to consider
Adoption of an Ordinance Establishing the Heritage Bay Community Development
District (COD) pursuant to Section 190.055, Florida Statutes. (Staff's request.)
Add Item 9H: Contract Sheriff service for traffic control on Bluebill and Gulfshore
Drive during high use times. (Commissioner Halas request.)
Item 16A7: The first line of the Fiscal Impact should read: "The total cost of
acquisition will not exceed $37,850 (rather than $40,000) . . .. (Staff's request.)
Add Item 16A13: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners and
the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) adopt an interlocal
agreement between Collier County and the CRA establishing policies for the CRA
pertaining to purchasing, personnel, contracting authority and budgeting.
(Companion to Item 16G3) (Staff's request.)
Item 16F3: The Tourism Agreement with Paradise Advertising was not included in
the agenda packet but has been provided to the Commissioners, the Clerk, the
County Manager, and has been made available to the public for review. Also, note
that the Board meeting referenced under "Considerations" should read April 26,
2005. (Executive Summary reads April 25, 2005.) (Staff's request.)
Item 17B: Section 4.9.K of the PUD document should read: At the time of the
first application for site development, the Petitioner shall contribute $5,000.00 to
the Collier County School District for acquisition and/or construction of a public
school bus stop to be located as close as possible to the subject site and be
subject to approval by the Department of Alternative Modes of Transportation.
(Staff's request.)
Also, the following text should be added to the PUD document as Section 3.4.1.(4):
(4) Prior to commencing clearing of the subject property, the developer shall
erect a 6-foot high chain link fence along the northern boundary of the abutting
residential home to the south extending eastward from approximately the Wilson
Boulevard right-of-way to the northeast corner of this first residential lot, then
southward 330 feet to the southeast corner of the second residential home located
to the south of the Wilson Boulevard Center PUD and then westward to
approximately the Wilson Boulevard right-of-way. Such fence shall also be
extended from its eastern boundary approximately 330 feet westward until it
connects to an existing fence running between the first 2 residential homes to the
south.
Page 2
Changes to BCC Agenda May 10, 2005
Item 17C continued to the Mav 24.2005 BCC Meetinq: Recommendation to adopt
a Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida
applying the Annual Mid-Cycle Indexing adjustments to amend the Water and
Sewer Impact Fee rate schedule, which is Schedule Two of Appendix A of Chapter
74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County
Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance No. 2001-13, as amended) and providing for
an effective date of June 1, 2005. (Staff's request.)
Time Certain Items:
Item 8B to be heard at 10:00 a.m. Petition: PUDA-2004-AR-6786 Vanderbilt
Partners II, LLC, represented by Richard Yovanovich of Goodlette, Coleman &
Johnson, P.A., requesting to amend the Cocohatchee Bay PUD document for the
limited purpose of amending the Bald Eagle Management Plan and related
references in the Planned Unit Development (PUD) document. The subject
property consisting of 352 acres, is located in Sections 8, 16, 17 & 20, Township
48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
Item 8E to be heard at 4:00 p.m. Approve a Resolution authorizing the submission
of a low interest State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan application to the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection for the construction of the Reclaimed
Water Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project, and to adopt the document called
"Collier County Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facilities Plan, March 2005" to
allow the County to avail itself of a low-interest SRF loan for this Project 74030.
Agenda Item No. 3A 1
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
Advisory Board Members Awards Participation
Board of County Commissioners Meeting 5-10-05
Name
Advisory Board
# of Years
Mr. Dale Lewis Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee 5
Mr. Glenn Tucker Tourist Development Council 5
-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 3A 1
May 10,2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
3A1
Advisory Committee Service Awards
5/10120059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Paula Springs
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Aide to the BCC
4/271200510:51:58 AM
Approved By
BCC Office
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the Bee
Date
Bec Office
4/271200510:52 AM
Approved By
James V, Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/2712005 4:27 PM
....f.
Agenda Item No. 4A
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
PROCLAMA TION
WHEREAS, human rights are protected by the law of the land and must be
respected by all: and,
WHEREAS, human trafficking, or modern day slavery, is an inhuman and evil
violation of human rights: and,
WHEREAS, the Federal Government estimates that between 18,000 and
50,000 persons are trafficked in the United States every year:
and,
WHEREAS, the State of Florida and local governments encourage the efforts
of local agencies and organizations who protect against the
violation of human rights, especially victims of human trafficking:
and,
WHEREAS, in Collier County the Immigrant Rights Advocacy Center and the
Coalition of Immokalee Workers have lead the outreach and
assisted rescuing victims of human trafficking: and,
WHEREAS, the Immigrant Rights Advocacy Center and the Coalition of
Immokalee Workers have been publicly recognized by the Federal
Agencies for their continued support to the arrest and
prosecution of traffickers and violators of human rights, and
most important the rescue of victims in Southwest Florida: and,
WHEREAS, the Immigrant Rights Advocacy Center and the Coalition of
Immokalee Workers recognized the need of community awareness
and education to assist in the creation of local support for a
''Zero Tolerance Campaign" against traffickers and the violation
of human rights in Collier County.
NOW THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County. Florida that the month of May, 2005 be designated
os
HUMAN TRAFFICKING AWARENESS MONTH
and
ZERO TOLERANCE FOR TRAFFICKERS IN COUIER COUNTY
OONE ANO OROEREO THIS 1 (/h of May, 2005
BOARO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIOA
FREO W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
-
OWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 4A
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
4A
Proclamation to designate the month of May, 2005 as Human Trafficking Awareness
Month and Zero Tolerance for Traffickers in Collier County. To be accepted by Lucas
Benitez & Laura Germino, Coalition of Immokalee Workers and Anna Rodriguez & Ana
Alonso. Immigrant Rights Advocacy Center.
5/10/2005 9:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Kathleen Martinson
Board of County
Commissioners
Administrative Aide to Bee
4/29/20052:59:43 PM
BCC Office
Approved By
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
4/29/2005 3:05 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/30/200512:35 PM
PROCLAMA TION
Agenda Item No. 48
May 10,2005
Page 1 of 2
WHEREAS, mental health is essential to everyone's overall physical health and
emotional well-being: and,
WHEREAS. mental illness will strike one in five adults and children in a given year
regardless of age. gender, race, ethnicity. religion. or economic
status: and.
WHEREAS. people who have mental illnesses can recover and lead full, productive
lives. and.
WHEREAS, an estimated two-thirds of adults and young people who have mental
health disorders are not receiving the help they need: and,
WHEREAS, the cost of untreated and mistreated mental illnesses and addictive
disorders to American businesses, governments, and families has grown
to $113 billian annually: and,
WHEREAS. community-based services that respond to individual and family needs
are cost-effective, and beneficial to consumers and the community:
and,
WHEREAS, the National Mental Health Association, the Mental Health Association
of Collier County and its national partners observe Mental Health
Month every May to raise awareness and understanding of mental
health and illness.
.-
NOW THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, that the month of May 2005, be designated as
MENTAL HEALTH MONTH
in Collier County, Florida, and call upon the citizens, government
agencies, public and private institutions, businesses and schools in
Collier County. Florida to recommit our community to increasing
awareness and understanding of mental health, and the need for
appropriate and accessible services for all people who have mental
illnesses .
DONE AND ORDERED THIS 10th of May, 2005
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE. CHAIRMAN
A TrEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
.-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 48
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
48
Proclamation to designate the month of May, 2005 as Mental Health Month. To be
accepted by Petra Jones, Executive Director for Mental Health Association of Collier
County, Inc.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Kathleen Martinson
Board of County
Commissioners
Administrative Aide to BCC
4129120053:04:27 PM
BCC Office
Approved By
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
412912005 3:14 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
41301200512:37 PM
Agenda Item No. 4C
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of2
P~OCLAMA TION
WHE~EAS, the Solvation Army is motiVtJted by 0 love of God ""d 0 love for
mankind: and,
WHE~EAS, the Solvation Army serves os 0 symbol of compassion and on
active participant in the provision of services to thousands of
men. women, and children in Collier County: and,
WHE~EAS, the Solvation Army Naples Corps provides spiritUGI counseling and
basic human necessities to the needy and hurting on a doily
basis: and,
WHE~EAS, the Salvation Army ht2S touched the lives of so many by providing
programs and services to residents for more than 20 years: and,
WHE~EAS, the Solvation Army played a vital part in emergency disaster
services after Hurricane Chorley, Frances, .Jeanne, and Ivan:
and,
WHE~EAS, the Solvation Army provides its services with compassion to 011
people in need without discrimination.
NOW THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida that May 9-14, 2005 be designated os
SALVATION ARMY WEEK
and urge 011 citizens to join us in honoring the dedicated officers,
employees, volunteers, and supporters of the Solvation Army.
OONE ANO OROEREO THIS 10th Oay of May 2005.
BOARO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIOA
FREO W, COYLE, CHAIRMAN
ATTEsT:
OWIGHT E. BROCK, CLE~K
-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 4C
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
4C
Proclamation to designate the week of May 9 through May 14,2005 as Salvation Army
Week, To be accepted by Major Ron Smith, Dr, Don Thomsen, Mr. David Brown, Mr.
Henry Caballero, Mr. Mel Forbis, and Mr. Herb Cambridge and Wanda Moore, of the
Salvation Army,
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Kathleen Martinson
Board of County
Commissioners
Administrative Aide to BCC
4/29/20053:16:35 PM
BCC Office
Approved By
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
4/29/20053:20 PM
Approved By
James V, Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/29/20054:32 PM
Agenda Item No. 4D
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of2
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the YMCA of Collier County is a not-for-profit organization with
a mission to build strong kids, strong families, and strong
communities; and,
WHEREAS, the YMCA of Collier County has been providing a safe place for
graduating high school seniors to celebrate the milestone of
graduation night for 19 years: and,
WHEREAS, the YMCA of Collier County is celebrating the 2(fh anniversary of
Project Graduation on May 20th, 2005, by hosting more than
J,ooo graduating seniors from nine area high schools: and,
WHEREAS, the YMCA of Collier County has fostered the partnership of
parents. school administrators, the local sheriff and police
departments, and businesses to provide an entertaining and safe
Project Graduation event for graduates; and,
WHEREAS, the YMCA of Collier County's Project Graduation has ensured
that there are no alcohol or drug related deaths on graduation
night in Collier County.
NOW THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida that May 2(fh 2005 be designated as
--
YMCA PROJECT GRAt>UA TION t>A Y
t>ONE ANt> ORt>EREt> THIS J (fh of May, 2005
BOARO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIt>A
,,;.,. . FREt> W. COYLE. CHAIRMAN
A TrEST:
t>WIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 40
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
4D
Proclamation to designate May 20, 2005 as YMCA Project Graduation Day. To be
accepted by Mr. Brandon Dowdy, Executive Director for the Greater Naples YMCA.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Kathleen Martinson
Board of County
Commissioners
Administrative Aide to BCC
4/29/20053:12:16 PM
BCC Office
Approved By
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
4/29/20053:16 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/30/200512:38 PM
Agenda Item No. 4E
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
PROCLAMA TION
WHEREAS, ftr IIItrIl than tI t:II1I1rry, the bicycle htu ,.", till l/fIpt1I"ft1IIt ptrt
of the Ilvtls of most Amer;ctl1lS: tlnd,
WHEREAS, ttJdtIy, millions of AItIIlrif:flns tIIIfJtlIge in bk:ycling bItt:tJustl it is tI
vltlble tIIId envirtJlllfltJ1lttllly friendly f()f'lfl of trtInsportati()/l, till
tlXCtlllent form of fitness tIIId pt't1Vidu fUtIlity ftllflily fWCIWl1i()fl:
tlnd,
WHEREAS, Collier CDunty tlCtitlely ent:tIIJIYIfIIl bit:yt:ling tIS' till impt/Jr'ttl1lt I1It1de
of frtlnsptJrltltion in preserving its f/Utllity of life: tint/,
WHEREAS, the NtlpWs Ptrl'h1lltlY CtxIlition htls formed to imprtJfle the syst-.
of bikeways, to educate the public tlbtJut bicycling, and to
/lfWlDte Stlfe bicycling ftr I"'IICIWltion tIIId trrJnspt1rttltitJn: and,
WHEREAS, the Collier County Altemativtl Tf'tInsportation Modes has btJen
t:IC'tifM in effwou to illCl"etl# tIpfJtJI'1rIIit ftr bicycling tIS till
tlCtivity tlnd mode of frtlnsptJrlati()/l thl"tJUflh its allitlfICe with the
_ khY1ptJlittlll Planning 0rgtInizatitJn:t- ptrlltwtlys Advisry
Committee.
NOW THEREFORE, be it procltlimed by the BtJt1rd of CtJunty CtJInmissitJners
of Collier County, Florida, that the month of May be designtlted
tIS Bike to Wri M()fIth, fJIId FridtIy, MtJy 20, 2OtJ6 be dcsigntlted
as
BIKE TO WORK DAY
DONE ANi> ORbEREb THIS Jd" day of Mtly, 2()M
BOARi> OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIbA
FREt> w. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
_.
OWXfiHT E. BROCK, CLERK
Agenda Item No. 4E
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
4E
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners issue a Proclamation
designating Friday, May 20, 2005 as Bike to Work Day in Collier County. To be accepted
by Norm Feder, Collier County Transportation Administrator. and Ted Litwin, Chairman for
Pathway Advisory Committee.
Meeting Date
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Pat Lehnhard
Executive Secretary
4/20/20053:39:15 PM
Transportation Services
Transportation Services Admin
Approved By
Sharon Newman
Accounting Supervisor
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/21/200510:34 AM
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Services Admin.
4/26/2005 2:31 PM
Approved By
Diane B. Flagg
Director of Alternative Transportation
Modes ATM Director
Date
Transportion Services
Alternative Transportation Modes
4/26/2005 5:53 PM
Approved By
Russ Muller
Engineer
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Engineering Services
4/27/2005 2:53 PM
Approved By
Pat Lehnhard
Executive Sacretary
Date
Transportation Services
Transportation Services Admin
4/27/20053:20 PM
Approved By
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
4129/2005 1 :56 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/29/2005 4:25 PM
Agenda Item No. 4F
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the open exchange of public discourse is essential to the
democratic system of government: and,
WHEREAS, as a cornerstone of democracy Americans have observed the
certain rules of behavior generally known as civility: and,
WHEREAS, civility, derived from the Latin words "civitas" meaning city and
"civis" meaning citizen behavior worthy of citizens living in a
community or in common with others: and,
WHEREAS, displays of anger, rudeness, ridicule, impatience, and a lack of
respect and personal attacks detract from the open exchange of
ideas, prevent fair discussion of the issues, and can discourage
individuals from participation in government: and,
WHEREAS, civility can assist in reaching consensus on diverse issues and
allow for mutually respectful ongoing relationships: and,
WHEREAS, civility can uplift our daily fife and make it more pleasant to live
in an organized society: and,
WHEREAS, the City. County and Local Government Law Section of The
Florida Bar urges the adoption of a pledge of civility by all
citizens in the State of Florida.
NOW THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida that the month of May is proclaimed as
CIVILITY MONTH
and calls upon all citizens to exercise civility toward each other.
DONE AND ORDERED THIS 10th Day of May 2005
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FREO W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
OWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 4F
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
4F
Proclamation to recognize the month of May, 2005 as Civility Month. To be accepted by
Collier County Attorney, David Weigel.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Kathleen Martinson
Board ot County
Commissioners
Administrative Aide to BCC
4/29/20052:53:32 PM
Bce Office
Approved By
Sue Filson
Board ot County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
Bce Ottice
4/29/20053:17 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4129/2005 4:48 PM
Agenda Item No. 4G
May 10. 2005
Page 1 of2
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, millions of Americans are served every day by public employees
providing a wide range of services: and,
WHEREAS, public employees take not only jobs, but oaths: and,
WHEREAS, many public employees such as police officers, firefighters,
military personnel, health care professionals, and others risk
their lives each day in service to the people of the United
States: and,
WHEREAS, public employees include: teachers in our schools, nurses to
administer vaccines, computer technicians to pay our Social
Security and Veteran's benefits, unemployment checks and food
stamps, safety inspectors and operators to ensure the security
of our water and wastewater plants, food inspectors to
guarantee the safety of our grocery purchases, laborers to
maintain our roads and bridges, transportation employees to see
us safely to our destinations by bus or train. and all the other
people who provide the diverse services required by the American
people of their government: and,
,.-
WHEREAS, without these government employees at every level, continuity
would be impossible in a democracy that regularly changes its
leaders and elected officials.
NOW THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County, Florida, that the month of May, 2005 be
recognized as
PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION MONTH
and that all citizens are encouraged to recognize the
accomplishments and contributions of government employees
at aI/levels of federal, state, county, and municipal.
DONE AND ORDERED THIS 10th Day of May, 2005.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
.-'
DWIGHT c. BROCK, CLERK
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 4G
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
4G
Proclamation to designate the month of May, 2005 as Public Service Recognition Month.
To be accepted by Jim Mudd. Collier County Manager, and Leo Ochs, Deputy County
Manager.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Kathleen Martinson
Board of County
Commissioners
Administrative Aide to BCC
4/29/2005 3:42:31 PM
BCC Office
Approved By
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
Approved By
BCC Office
4/29/20053:57 PM
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/29/2005 4:35 PM
Agenda Item No, 6A
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 4
~
COlLIER COUNIY MANAGER'S OFFICE
3301 East Tamiami Trail. Naples, FL 34112 . 239-774-8383 . Fax 239-774-4010
April 28, 2005
Mr. Keith Tompkins
Property Manager
Eagle Creek Community Association, Inc.
12709 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, FL 34113
Re: Public Petition Request to Discuss Traffic Signal on Collier Boulevard at the Eagle
Creek Entrance
Dear Mr. Tompkins:
Please be advised that you are scheduled to appear before the Collier County Board of
Commissioners at the meeting of May 10, 2005, regarding the above referenced subject.
Your petition to the Board of County Commissioners will be limited to ten minutes.
Please be advised that the Board will take no action on your petition at this meeting.
However, your petition may be placed on a future agenda for consideration at the
Board's discretion. Therefore, your petition to the Board should be to advise them of
your concern and the need for action by the Board at a future meeting.
The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Board's Chambers on the Third Floor of the W,
Harmon Turner Building (Building "F") of the government complex. Please arrange to be
present at this meeting and to respond to inquiries by Board members.
If you require any further information or assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this
office.
Sincerely, /~,
~/~.,/ .... /"
.' //'/, 1'- /--
l.,/ .-~
. mes V. Mudd .-
County Manager
JVMljb
cc: David Weigel, County Attorney
Norman Feder, Administrator, Transportation Services
_.
c
It
t~ .
"
c
It
..
H
t 1
Agenda Item No. 6A
May 10. 2005
Page 2 of 4
Bagl. C~k Community AaaociatioD, Inc.
12709 T.-iaai Trail ...~
Mapl.., WL 34113
239 193-1643
rax 239 793-0691
April 25, 2005
Jim Mudd
County Manager
Collier County
Naples, FL 34112
Dear Mr. Mudd.:
I am writing on behalf of the Eagle Creek Homeowners' Association as their property manager. I em formally
petit:i0Din& the Board ofCoumy Commissioners to instruct staff to aggressively p1D'Sue gettina: the Florida
Department ofTraosportation to reconsider its recent decision to not locate a traffic signal on CoUier Blvd. at the
entrances to Eagle Creek and the Artesa Painte PUD. FOOT's announced decision also includes closiDa the
existing mediaD openiDg aa'OSS from the entrance to Eagle Creek thereby creating a tmnendous safety issue for
oW'residents and those traveling Collier Boulevard South of U.S. 41.
We have worked with WalMart and their replesentatives for the Jut 18 months in an effort to secure FOOT's
approval ofthc traffic signal at the Eagle Creek entrance, We have also previously worked with the FOOT staff
overseeing this decision. About 8 weeks ago we were assured after raising severalllfe safety issues, that no
decision would be made by FOOT without more public input. However, despite this prior assu.nm.ce by FOOT
statt: the decision was made by the FOOT staff in a confetence call last Thursday, without any prior notice of the
conference call by FOOT to Eagle Creek.
It is thus that the property owners and resicleots of Eagle Creek petition the Board to direct its staft'to
aggressively pursue; with FOOT, the approval of a 1raftic signal at the entrance to Eagle Creek.
We ask the Board OfCoW1ty Commissioners for help with this issue.
Sincerely,
Keith Tompkins,
Property Manager
RE: Petition of Board
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 6A
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of4
mudd.J
From: Keith Tompkins [KeithOcamnaples.com]
sent: Wednesday, April 27, 20059:38 PM
To: muddJ
SUbject: RE: Petition of Board
Despite Mr. Coyle's efforts to help me avoid coming back to the Board, I would like to be listed on the
agenda under the public petition process for the next meeting May 10. I am going to make available
new information from professional engineers the Board counts on for advice on other projects that make
the arguement the traffic signal does work at the Eagle Creek Drive intersection. There is a lot of data
indicating it will work from the engineers (Reed Jarvi). Mr. Feeder either does not know about the data
or is choosing to ignore the local data and opt for the FOOT hired study. I did not want to have a public
arguement about this in front of the Board and the public as I do not want to do anything to upstage
county staff. They work too hard to have people do that to them.
I will present this to the Board members individually and would like the opportunity for this issue to be
heard once again. My hope is the Board and Mr. Feeder will agree with the data that indicating the light
at EC Drive in fact works.
Thank you Mr. Mudd for your help with this.
Keith Tompkins
---Original Mcssage--
FroID: muddJ
Sent: Mon 4/2512005 4:56 PM
To: Keith Tompkins
C~: bodinejudi
Subject: RE: Petition of Board
Keith,
If you want to address the ace on this issue Tuesday, 26 April (Tomorrow) you will have to do it under Public
Comment and I can not give you an exact time.
If you wait and want to be added as a pubfu:: petition on 10 May, I can ten you that the item will be beard around 0930
am.
Or you can do both.
Sincerely,
Jim Mudd
---original Message--
From: Keith Tompkins [ntailto:Keith@clU!l!l~pll:_!!,c.()m)
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 4:20 PM
To: mudd~
Subject: Petition of Board
Please see the attachment for a petition to the Board for help with a
street light location. I would like to address the Board at some point
4/28/2005
RE: Petition of Board
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item No. 6A
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 4
Tuesday but wanted an idea of an approximate time. Can I be added IS an
issue, or do I need to address d1em informally this meeting and then get
011 the next agenda?
I can be reached anytime at 641-3186 regarding this matter. Any help
you can provide in nailing down the time or the procedure would be
greatly appreciated.
Keith Tompkins,
President
Collier Association Management, Inc.
12709 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, FL 34113
239-793-1643
Fax 239-793-0691
Keith@CAMNaples.com
4/28/2005
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 46
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to consider Adoption of an Ordinance Establishing the Heritage Bay
Community Development District (CDD) pursuant to Section 190.005, Florida Statutes.
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this public hearing is for the Board to review and consider a petition for the
establishment of the Heritage Bay COD by adoption of an ordinance.
CONSIDERATIONS:
On March 14, 2005, Bay Home USH, Inc., a Florida Limited Liability Company of which the
managing member is Bayvest L.L.C. by and through its undersigned attorney, jointly filed a
petition with Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development and Environmental
Services Division, for the establishment of the Heritage Bay Community Development District.
A mandatory $15,000 application fee was submitted with the petition.
The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida and covers 687.33:t acres
of land. The site is located in a portion of Sections 13 & 24, Township 48 South, Range 26 East.
A map showing the location of the land area to be serviced by the District, as well as a metes and
bounds description of the proposed COD, appears as Exhibits "1 & 2" to the petition. The
landowner's consent to the establishment of the proposed COD appears as Exhibit "3" of the
petition,
The COD is comprised of a previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) and
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) known as "Heritage Bay." The proposed CDD includes
a portion of the entire DRI development, which portion is approved for 175,000 square feet of
commercial space, 55,000 square feet of office space, 409 single-family, 826 multi-family
dwelling units, and 200 assisted living units.
By adopting the ordinance and granting the petition, the Board of County Commissioners would
authorize the District, through its Board of Supervisors, to manage and finance certain basic
infrastructure for the benefit of the landowners and residents of the Heritage Bay Development.
This infrastructure, under section 190.012(1), Florida Statutes, includes basic urban systems,
facilities and services, including water supply, sewers and wastewater management, surface
water control and management (drainage), and roads, bridges and street lights. If adopted, this
ordinance would !!.2! constitute consent by the County to the exercise of certain additional
special powers authorized by Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes. These powers may include
the operation of parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational
uses, as well as security, including, but not limited to, guard-houses, fences and gates, electronic
intrusion-detection systems, and patrol cars, with certain exceptions. In order to gain these
additional powers, the newly created District Board would need to further petition the Board of
County Commissioners at a later date.
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 46
The District Board of Supervisors is initially elected for the first six years of the duration of this
district in a property-based election (one-acre, one-vote), which has been specifically ruled
constitutional (State of Florida v. Frontier Acres Community Development Dist., 472 So. 2d 455
(Fla, 1985)). By operation of law, in time, the Supervisors are elected on a one-person, one-vote
basis.
In order to provide the basic systems, facilities and services, the District has certain management
and financing powers. It may only exercise those powers, however, if they comply with certain
strict and detailed procedural requirements including ethics in government, disclosure, conflict of
interest requirements, noticed meetings, government-in-the-sunshine conduct, accounting and
reporting requirements to various local and state agencies, consultants' competitive negotiation
procedures, competitive bidding procedures and others.
The adoption of the eDD ordinance does not constitute a form of development approval.
Adoption of the CDD and compliance with these many procedural requirements does not,
in any way, allow the District to manage and finance any of these services and facilities
without showing that all legitimate policies, constraints, authorities, controls, permits or
conditions on the development of the land, whether local, regional, state or federal in
nature, and whether in the form of policies, laws, rules, regulations or ordinances, have
been complied with conceruing development of the property. In essence, adoption of the
enD ordinance does not exempt the petitioner from compliance with any applicable local,
regional, state or federal permitting or regulatory processes. In this sense, the Community
Development District is merely a mechanism to assure the County and the landowners of
the district that the provision of infrastructure and services for the PUD is managed and
financed in an efficient and economical way. Finally, in order to prevent potential abuses
of districts by landowners or by other local governments, the Legislature has provided that
the charter of the District, in the general statute itself, may be amended only by the
Legislatu reo
In order to provide these systems, facilities and services, the District also is given certain
eminent domain powers within tight constraints as well as the authority to require service
charges, fees or taxes for the various services rendered, ranging from installation of capital
facilities to long-term maintenance and repair. Without the County's consent, by resolution, the
aforementioned eminent domain power is limited to the boundaries of the District.
The District may also issue revenue and other user bonds as well as general obligation bonds.
However, no general obligation bonds can be issued without a referendum and without showing
that the bond will not exceed 35 percent of the assessed valuation of the property within the
District. Even with these safeguards and constraints, during the first six years of the District's
existence, the board of supervisors shall not issue general obligation bonds unless the board first
holds elections on a one-person, one-vote basis for a new board of supervisors.
Accordingly, if Collier County adopts the ordinance, then it establishes the Heritage Bay
Community Development District as a management tool to benefit both Collier County's existing
and future landowners with pinpointed responsibility for timely, efficient, reliable and flexible
service provision without burdening the existing taxpayers and financial structure of Collier
County. In addition, the District is also a financing tool off the balance sheet of the County and
-
2
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 46
the developer. It will provide long-range and sustained quality service to initial and subsequent
landowners without burdening Collier County and its taxpayers.
Finally, such a District may not outlive its practical utility and usefulness. If it ceases to
function, it will automatically be disbanded by state law. If at any time during its existence
Collier County determines by a non-emergency ordinance that it can provide anyone of the
district services in a more economical manner, over the long term, at lower cost but with higher
quality, Collier County may then take that service away from the District and provide the service
itself.
Section 190.005, Florida Statutes provides that the exclusive and uniform method for
establishment of a CDD of less than 1,000 acres shall be by county ordinance. Section 190.005,
Florida Statutes outlines the specific content required in the petition and further outlines six (6)
factors for the Board of County Commissioners to consider in determining whether to grant or
deny a petition for the establishment of a CDD as follows:
1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true
and correct.
2. Whether the creation of the District is inconsistent with any applicable element or
portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government
comprehensive plan.
3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is
sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one
functional interrelated community,
4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the District.
5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the District will be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
6. Whether the area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate
special-district government.
County legal, planning, transportation and public works staffs have reviewed the petition and
exhibits submitted by the petitioners (attached) relative to these six (6) factors and have found
the proposed Heritage Bay CDD petition to be compliant with each of the six (6) review factors.
Staff analysis relative to the six factors can be found in Attachment 2.
FISCAL IMP ACT:
As previously noted, a $15,000 filing fee was submitted with the petition. Exhibit "5" of the
petition, "Heritage Bay Community Development District Proposed Timetable And Estimated
Costs of Construction" delineates the fiscal impacts and timing of impacts to be managed by the
District. It is noteworthy that the estimated internal infrastructure and services to be financed by
the CDD is $44,377,000 consisting of roadway and utilities construction, water management,
landscaping, lighting, signage, environmental mitigation and contingency costs. Utilities will
eventually be turned over to Collier County.
3
Agenda Item No, 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 46
DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES:
According to the petition, the Heritage Bay Community Development District, if the ordinance is
adopted, will assume responsibility for the following:
(I) General development of the approved uses within the District;
(2) Roadways;
(3) Street Lights, landscaping and signage;
(4) Stormwater Management;
(5) Water & Sewer Utilities;
(6) Environmental Mitigation; and
(7) Other matters related to the above tasks.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
The 687.33:!: acres of the Heritage Bay CDD are designated Urban, Industrial District, on the
Collier County Future Land Use Map. Although the establishment of this district does not
constitute any development approval, the plan of development previously approved for the
subject property has been determined to be consistent with the Collier County Growth
Management Plan (GMP). Accordingly, any future petitions for rezone or development permits
will be subsequently reviewed at the time of submittal, and will be subject to the requirements
and limitations specified in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), and will be
required to be consistent with the GMP in effect at that time.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
"If adopted by the Board of County Commissioners, the subject Ordinance would establish a
Community Development District (CDD) and a District Board of Supervisors. The purpose of
establishing a CDD, as per Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, is to establish an independent special
district as an alternative method to manage and finance basic services for community
development." The primary purpose of a CDD is to provide a long-term financing mechanism
for the subject development through:
I. Assessments
2. Ad Valorem Taxation
3. Issuance of Bonds
Creation of a CDD provides assurance that the capital infrastructure improvements necessary in
the District are funded by bond investors and subsequent purchasers of the parcels in the District.
The proposed CDD will be receiving sanitary sewer, potable water, and solid waste removal
services from the Collier County Utilities Division and will have to enter into one or more
interlocal agreements with Collier County, for such purposes.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt and enact the proposed
ordinance establishing the Heritage Bay Community Development District.
Prepared by: Glenn Heath. Principal Planner.
_ Comprehensive Planning Department
4
Item Numbe,
Item Summery
Meeting Date
Agenda ItelTl No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 46
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SA
P"blic He.nng to consider Adoption of an Ord",anca Establishing lha Heritage Bay
Community Development District (COD) pursuant to Section 190.005, Florida Slatutes.
5110120059:00:00 AM
Pr.pared By
412UI2005 1 :53:34 PM
Glenn HIRth
Community Oevelopment &
Environmental Servic..
Date
Principal Planner
Compreheneive Planning
Date
Approved By
Sandra Lea
Community Oevelopment &
Environmental Servlc8s
Executive Seoretary
Community Development &
Environmental Servic.. Admin,
412212U05 9:32 AM
Dahl
Approved By
Constance A. Johnson
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operutlon$ Analy.t
Community Developrnent &
Environmental Servic.. Admin.
4/261200510:22 AM
Oate
Approved By
Stan Litllinger
Community Development &
E'nvlronmental S.,...,ices
Compnthens~v. Planning Director
Compnthensivl!lI Plunning
4126/2UU512:41 PM
Approved By
Jo..ph K. Schmitt
Community Oev9loprn.nt &
Environrnentat Servlc"
Community Development &
Environmental Services. Admlnlltrator
Date
Comnlunity Development &
Environmental Servic.s Admin.
412612005 2:05 PM
Dllte
Approved By
PllItrick G. White
County Attorney
Aa.sls.tant County Attorney
County Attorney Office
4128/2005 2: 28 PM
Oate
Approved By
OMS Coordlnutor
County Manager's Office
Administrative A.silit.nt
Office of Management & Budget
4128/20054:10 PM
Date
Approved By
Mark luckson
County M1naoar's Office
Budget An.lyat
Offine of Manllgemeflot 8. Budget
5/212005 5:38 PM
Date
Approved By
Michael Smykowskl
County Manager's Offic.e
I\bnagement & Budget Olrector
Office of Mllnugement & Budget
5/2/2008 6:U3 PM
Date
Approved By
Jameli V. Mudd
Boord of County
Cornmis>>lon.,..
County Manager
County MBnager'1i Office
51212005 8: 17 PM
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 46
ORDINANCE NO, 05-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ESTABLISHING HERITAGE BAY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; DESCRIBING THE
EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; NAMING THE INITIAL
MEMBERS OF THE DISTRICT'S BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; NAMING
THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING
THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS;
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR
INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Bay Home USH, Inc" a Florida Limited Liability Company of which is the
managing member Bayvest L.L.c., has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners (Board)
of Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, to establish the
HERITAGE BAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (District); and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, after proper published notice has
conducted a public hearing on the petition and determined the following with respect to the
factors to be considered in Section 190.005(I)(e) Florida Statutes, as required by Section
190.005(2)(c), Florida Statutes:
I, The petition is complete in that it meets the requirements of Sections 190.005
(I)(e) 2., and 190.005(2)(a), Florida Statutes; and all statements contained within
the petition are true and correct.
2. Establishment of the proposed District is not inconsistent with any applicable
element or portion of the local comprehensive plan of Collier County, known as
the Collier County Growth Management Plan, or the State Comprehensive Plan.
3. The area of land within the proposed District is of sufficient size, is sufficiently
compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional
interrelated community.
4. The District is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be serviced by the District.
5, The community development services and facilities of the District will not be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
6. The area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate special-district
government; and
WHEREAS, it is the policy of this State, as provided for in Section 190,002 (2) (c),
Florida Statutes, that the exercise by any independent district of its powers as set forth by
uniform general law comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations, and
policies governing planning and permitting of the development to be serviced by the district, to
ensure that neither the establishment nor operation of such district is a development order under
Chapter 380, Florida Statutes and that the district so established does not have any zoning or
permitting powers governing development; and
WHEREAS, Section 190.004 (3), Florida Statutes, provides that all governmental
planning, environmental, and land development laws, regulations, and ordinances apply to all
development of the land within a community development district. Community development
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 46
districts do not have the power of a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan, building
code, or land development code, as those terms are defined in the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. A district shall take no action
which is inconsistent with applicable comprehensive plans, ordinances, or regulations of the
applicable local general-purpose government; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 190,012, Florida Statutes, upon the establishment ofthe
proposed community development district, the District Board of Supervisors will have the right
to seek consent from Co llier County for the grant of authority to exercise special powers without
question as to the continued right authority and power to exercise its limited powers as
established by this Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
SECTION ONE:
AUTHORITY FOR ORDINANCE
This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Section 190.005 (2), Florida Statutes, and other
applicable provisions of law governing county ordinances.
SECTION TWO: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE HERITAGE BAY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
The Heritage Bay Community Development District is hereby established within the
boundaries of the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by
reference herein.
SECTION THREE: DESIGNATION OF INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS
The following five persons are herewith designated to be the initial members of the Board
of Supervisors:
I.
Jeffry Marculaitis
541 SE 1 st Terrace
Cape Coral, FL 33990
3.
Samuel W. Marshall, P,E,
4413 E. Riverside Drive
Fort Myers, FL 33905
2,
Frank L. Reynolds
611 SW 52nd Street
Cape Coral, FL 33914
4,
Ronnie S. Searcy
P,O. Box 354
Labelle, FL 33935
5. Russell R, Smith
5327 Summerlin Road #12
Fort Myers, FL 33919
SECTION FOUR: DISTRICT NAME
The community development district herein established shall henceforth be known as the
"Heritage Bay Community Development District."
2
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 46
SECTION FIVE: STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE DISTRICT
The Heritage Bay Community Development District shall be governed by the provisions
of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and all other applicable general and local law .
SECTION SIX:
CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS
Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, the Heritage Bay Community Development
District will be duly and legally authorized to exist and exercise all of its general powers as
limited by law; and has the right to seek consent from the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners for the grant of authority to exercise special powers in accordance with Section
190,012(2), Florida Statutes, without question as to the district's continued right, authority and
power to exercise its general powers as established by this Ordinance. The District Board's
authority to exercise special powers may include the power to plan, establish, acquire, construct
or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate, and maintain additional systems and facilities
for: (i) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses;
and (ii) security, including, but not limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic
intrusion-detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies;
except that the District may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate
Local general-purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services within the
District boundaries; all as authorized and described by Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes.
SECTION SEVEN: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other
applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. [fany phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion.
SECTION EIGHT: INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES
The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws
and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered
or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section,"
"article," or any other appropriate word.
SECTION NINE: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State.
PASSED ON DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, this _ day of ~2005.
3
ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to from
and legal sufficiency:
Patrick G. White,
Assistant County Attorney
Mk/f:\compplanlCDD/ORD.
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10. 2005
Page 9 of 46
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
4
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 46
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
RE: PROPOSED ORDINANCE PURSUANT
TO SECTION 190.005(2), FLORIDA
STATUTES TO ESTABLISH ON
PROPER TV PROPOSED IN THE PETITION
THE HERITAGE BAY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT:
/
PETITION FOR ESTABLISHMENT BY COUNTY
ORDINANCE OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
ON PROPERTY PROPOSED IN THE PETITION
Petitioner, Bay Home USH, Inc., a Florida Limited Liability Company of which it is the
managing member Bayvest L.L.C, by and through its undersigned attorney, petitions the
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (the
"Commission"), to adopt an ordinance: establishing, on the proposed property, and recognizing,
the community development district ("Districf') created and chartered by Uniform General Law,
the Uniform Community Development District Act of Florida, chapter 190, FS., (2003 and
hereafter); acknowledging the uniform district charter expressed in Sections 190.006-190.041,
Florida Statutes (FS.), and as referenced by section 190.004(4), FS., and section 189.4031(2),
FS.; establishing the District on the property proposed in this petition and designating the initial
district Board of Supervisors; and, designating the proposed land area within the District may
manage and finance its basic infrastructure, systems, facilities, services, improvements and
projects. In support whereof Petitioner submits:
1. Petitioner, Bay Home USH, Inc., managing member of Bayvest L.L.C. is a Florida
1
Agenda Item No, 8A
May 10. 2005
Page 11 of 46
Limited Liability Company, its principal place of business at 10481 Ben C. Pratt Parkway, Fort
Myers, FL 33912, and Brian Sa bean is Vice President - Operations Manager.
2. The land area to be serviced by the District is located wholly in unincorporated Collier
County. The land area is bounded on the north by conservation land controlled by Corkscrew
Regional Ecosystem Watershed Land and Water Trust, Inc.; on the east by the Bonita Bay Club
golf course; on the south by Immokalee Road (SR 846); and on the west by the Quarry golf
course subdivision; and comprises approximately 687.33 contiguous acres, more or less. A map
showing the location of the land area proposed to be serviced by the District is attached as
Exhibit "1".
3. A metes and bounds legal description of the proposed external boundaries of the
District is attached as Exhibit "2". There is no real property within the proposed boundaries of
the District which is to be excluded from the jurisdiction of the District
4. Attached as Exhibit "3" is documentation constituting written consent to the
establishment of the District by the owners of one hundred percent (100%) of the real property to
be included in the land area proposed to be serviced by the District.
5. The five (5) persons designated to serve as the initial members of the Board of
Supervisors of the District, who are citizens of the United States residents of the State of Florida
and who shall serve in that office until replaced by elected members as provided in section
190.006, FS., are:
(1)
Jefffiy Marculaitis
541 SE 1st Terrace
Cape Coral, FL 33990
Frank L. Reynolds
611 SW 52nil Street
(2)
Samuel W. Marshall, P,.E.
4413 E. Riverside Drive
Fort Myers, FL 33905
(3)
(4)
Ronnie S. Searcy
P. O. Box 354
2
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 46
(5)
Cape Coral, FL 33914
Russell R Smith
5327 Summerlin Road #12
Fort Myers, FL 33919
LaBelle, FL 33935
6. The proposed name of the District is the "Heritage Bay Community Development
District. "
7. A map of the land area proposed for the establishment by ordinance of the state
created and chartered District, showing current major trunk water mains, sewer interceptors,
utilities and outfalls, ifany, is attached as Exhibit "4".
8. The proposed timetable and the estimated related costs of cons1ruction and provision
of District systems, facilities and services which are contemplated by Petitioner to be proposed to
the District Board of Supervisors, if the District is established, and based upon available data
which are subject to change, is attached as Exhibit "5".
9. Collier County ("County") has adopted all mandatory elements of its Local
Government Comprehensive Plan ("Plan") in accordance with requirements of chapter 163, FS.,
and Collier County has completed its revised plan for minimum criterion review pursuant to
chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, by adoption of County Ordinance No. 2000-25
("2000 Plan"), as amended. County Ordinance No. 2000-25 and all amendments as enacted
designates the legal description of the land area proposed to be served by the District as "Urban
Residential Fringe Subdistrict.
Attached as Exhibit "6-A" is a copy of the future land use designation as set forth in the
text of the Future Land Use Element of the 2000 Plan. Attached as Exhibit "6-B" is a copy of
the Future Land Use map showing the future general distribution, location and extent of public
and private uses of land contemplated by the local government comprehensive plan of Collier
3
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 13 of 46
County for the land area proposed to be serviced by the District. Additionally, a copy of the
entire 2000 Plan, as amended, has been placed on file with the staff of the Commission for its
review and consideration. Exhibit "6-C" is a copy of a letter from the Florida Department of
Community Affairs reflecting that the 2000 Plan is in compliance.
10. A Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs ("SERC") of the Commission's
granting this Petition, and the establishment (on the property proposed in the petition) by County
Commission ordinance of the state uniform and exclusive created and chartered District pursuant
thereto, in accordance and in compliance with sections 190.005(1)(a)(8) and 120.541, FS., is
attached as Exhibit "7".
11. Petitioner attaches, as Exhibit "8" to this Petition, discussions by qualified engineers
and planners providing information for use by the Collier County and its staff in consideration of
the six factors for establishment of the District on the proposed property, and in support of the
Commission granting this Petition, and as additional materials in support of the statements in this
Petition, alleges (with the sequence discussed logically with factor No.4 considered last):
A. The Petition hereby affirms that all of the statements contained herein are true
and correct, in compliance with sections 190.005(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)1., FS. (See Exhibit
"8").
B. As according to the Future Land Use element of the Plan, the future land use
designation for the land area proposed to be included in the District is "Mixed Use Master
Planned Community". (See Exhibit "8"). The District, if established on the proposed property,
would not be inconsistent with the policies under the future land use Urban Residential Fringe
Subdistrict category of the Plan. For a further discussion on these matters and related applicable
4
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 46
Plan matters and also the State Comprehensive Plan, please reference Exhibit "8". See s.
190.oo5(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)2., F.S.
C. The land area proposed to be included within the state-created and chartered
District is comprised of approximately 687.33 contiguous acres which are of sufficient size,
sufficiently compact and contiguous sufficiently to be developable as one functional,
interrelated community as discussed in Exhibit "8". See s. 19O.005(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)3.,
FS.
D. The community development systems, facilities and services to be provided
by the District on the proposed property will supplement, and will not in any way be
incompatible with, existing roads and other local and regional community development systems,
facilities and services on the proposed property. This matter is described further in Exhibit "8".
See s. 190.oo5(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)5., FS.
E. The area proposed to be served by the District is amenable to separate special
district government in the light of the information to be considered regarding the other factors.
This matter is described further in Exhibit "8". See s. 190.oo5(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)6, F.S.
F. Because the information in the Petition is true and correct; because
establishment is not inconsistent with applicable local or state comprehensive plans; because the
land area is of sufficient size and compactness, and is contiguous sufficiently, to be developable
as one functional interrelated community; because the systems, facilities and services of the
District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional
community development systems, facilities and services; because the land area proposed to be
served by the District is amenable to separate special district government; and because, if
5
Agenda Item No, 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 15 of 46
established on the proposed property, following the procedures in s. 190.005(2), F.S., the District
will constitute under s. 190.002(1)(b), F .S. a mechanism for timely, efficient, effective,
responsive and economic delivery of its systems, facilities and services; the Dis1rict is, therefore,
the best alternative available for delivering these systems, facilities and services to the proposed
property in light of the services, systems and facilities which would be provided otherwise as
discussed in more detail in Exhibit "8". See s. 190.005(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)4, F.S.
12. Petitioner acknowledges certain legal and policy points regarding the Collier County
Water-Sewer District and related matters, as set forth in the official Acknowledgment attached to
the Petition as Exhibit "9", and incorporated herein. Petitioner contemplates a petition by the
Dis1rict, once established, to obtain consent of the Commission as provided by Section
190.012(2), Florida Statutes, to exercise some or all the powers provided therein including
specifically but not limited to parks and recreation and security as provided by 190.012 (2) (a) (b)
WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests respectfully the Commission to:
A. Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local, public, non-emergency and
information-gathering ordinance hearing pursuant to the requirements of section 190.005(2)( c),
FS., on the subject of whether to grant this Petition for the establishment on the proposed land
area of the state chartered and created Heritage Bay Community Development District and to
enact the ordinance establishing the District on the proposed property.
B. Grant this Petition and adopt the ordinance to establish the District in conformity
herewith: to designate in the ordinance the land area to be served by the District, the name of the
District and the initial members of the Board of Supervisors of the District and to recognize in
the ordinance, by statutory citation, that the uniform and exclusive general law charter of the
6
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 46
District was created by the Florida Legis]ature in section ]90.006-190.041, FS., as confirmed in
section 190.004(4), FS., and confirmed further in section ]89.4031(2), FS. Recognize the
impending Petition from the District, if established, for consent by the Commission to exercise
certain enumerated special powers granted to the District by its exclusive uniform charter under
section 190.012(2), FS., and that such potential exercise has been reviewed and assessed to the
date of the ordinance. Providing finally that with regard to any future specific consent by the
county to the exercise by the District of any of such special granted powers in its general law
charter, the legal existence and authority of the District, as created by state law and as established
on the proposed property by this ordinance, shall have been decided upon establishment.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMIlTED this
day of March, 2005.
BRIAN SABEAN
Vice President
Bay Horne USH, Inc.
] 4081 Ben C. Pratt Parkway
Fort Myers, FL 33912
Telephone: (239)931-3820
KENZA VAN ASSENDERP
Attorney for Petitioner
Young van Assenderp, P.A.
225 S. Adams Street, Suite 200
Tallahassee, FL 32301
Telephone: (850) 222-7206
K.:\USCll'll\Kfolden\US HOMES\Heritaje BA Y\Petition for Establishment by CoWlty Ordinance ofa District,wpd
7
",,'" "";"'''"''''~'"'''~'''''''"'''"'w''"'''''''''''''''''''~>i~_'4!""i}\!ll~,lliOt/I.",;;''''i'";,,,,,,,,",',
WII.nMllle,"
New D1rsct1on8/n Planning. DMirJn & Englfleering
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 46
EXHIBIT "2"
LEGAL DESeRI PTION
HERITAGE BAY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Being a portion of Sections 13 & 24,
Township 48 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida
A parcel of land being a portion of Sections 13 & 24, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Colller County,
Florida, being more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at the Southeast comer of said Section 24; thence N.01014'51''W. along the East line of
Section 24, a distance of 100.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, leaving said East line of
Section 24, N.8905B'OO''W., a distance of 2,636.89 feet; thence N.8905B'37"W" a distance of 2,514,00
feet; thence N.01033'42"W., a distance of 1,535,94 feet; thence N.65025'35"E. a distance of 270.30';
thence N.19O'35'01"W., a distance of 187.76 feet; thence N.02000'24"W., a distance of 272.35 feet to a
point of curvature; thence along the arc of a tangent curve concave to the East, having for Its elements a
radius of 35.00 feet, a central angle of 35005'48", a chord of 21.11 feet, a chord bearing 01 N,15032'30"E.,
an arc distance of 21.44 feet; thence N.56054'3E)'W., a distance of 20.00 feet; thence N.02O'OO'24'W., a
distance of 353.42 feet; thence N.53~4a'12"E" a distance of 91.45 feet; thence S,36~11'48t'E., a distance
of 58.90 feet to a point of curvature; thence along the arc of a tangent curve concave to the North, having
for its elements a radius of 60,00 feet, a central angle of 710'39'28", a chord of 70.24 feet, e chord bearing
of S.12O'01'32"E., an arc distance of 75.04 feet; thence N.72008'43"E., a distance of 147.48 feet; thence
N.OBo12'01"W., a distance of 69,11 feet; thence S.8go30'35"E., a distance of 211.29 feet; thence
S.87058'25"E., a distance of 164.30 feet; thence N.88010'39"E., a dIstance of 189.91 feet; thence
N.88059'22"E., a distance of 167.28 feet; thence S.88056'16"E., a distance of 149.44 feet; thence
N.89031'16"E., a distance of 138.78 feet; thence N.89O'45'41 "E., a distance of 110,44 feet; thence
N.89036'13"E., a distance of 119.99 feet; thence S.89019'35"E., a distance of 154.78 feet; thence
N.88O'08'30"E., a distance of 180.40 feet; thence N.B9O'41'04"E., a distance of 36,61 feet; thence
N.01022'56"E., a distance of 902.58 feet; thence N.21047'57"E., a distance of 391.48 feet; thence
N.28017'20"E., a distance of 190.21 feet; thence N.12010'59"E" a distance of 299.09 feet; thence
N.07"56'42 II E., a distance of 77.53 feet; thence N.04O'26'52"E., a distance of 138.12 teet; thence
N.21021'56"E., a distance of 700.45 feet; thence N.73O'43'21"W., a distance of 5.43 feet; thence
N,31047'35"E., a drstance of 117.82 teet; thence S.82O'26'17"E., a distance 01 54.75 feet; thence
S.79017'56"E., a distance of 76.80 feet; thence N.79O'45'22"E., a distance of 109.31 feet; thence
N.51055'31"E., a distance of 44,51 feet; thence N.12O'26'48"W., a distance of 54.47 feet; thence
N.04042'52"E., a distance of 100.62 feet; thence N.26O'24'S1'W" a distance of 132.45 feet; thence
N,20055'33'W., a d~stance of 114.96 feet; thence N.33O'53'11"W., a distance of 80,19 feet; thence
N.2r02'08"W., a distance of 95.88 feet; thence N.31003'58"W., a distance of 113.23 feet; thence
N.19042'29"W., a distance of 77.43 feet; thence N.18O'58'07"W., a distance of 99.15 feet; thence
N.09009'58"W,, a distance of 127.56 feet: thence N.07059'11"E., a distance of 85.65 feet; thence
N.04034'03"E., a distance of 88.03 feet; thence N.12042'24"E., a distance of 151.66 feet; thence
N.16035'04"E., a distance of 147.18 feet; thence N.28019'13"E., a distance of 100.89 feet; thence
N.21000'29"E., a distance of 98.19 feet; thence N,21016'27"E., a distance of 79.29 feet; thence
N.04000'26"W., a distance of 71.26 feet; thence N.08009'40"W,, a distance of 112.57 feet; thence
N.OQO'25'15"W., a distance of 65.37 feet; thence N.07035'10''W., a distance of 84,46 feet; thence
N.19052'10"W" a distance of 62.40 feet; thence N,04000'39"W" a distance of 50,18 feet; thence
N,24033'09"W., a distance of 67.8e feet; thence N.39015'3B"W., a distance of 74,17 feet; thence
N.42051'42"W., a distance of 55.72 feet; thence N.75015'30"W" a distance of 75.06 feet: thence
N.06047'16"E., a distance of 42.98 feet; thence N,11009'27"W.. a distance of 71.52 feet; thence
N.18029'29"W., a distance of 86.64 feet; thence N,D2O'32'Q4"W., a distance of 70.78 feet; thence
NJlJpJes
Furt Mf/Jl's Sarasota r:unpa TSJll'lJSS$i/6 FtttflUt/JI tit, BtH1Ch
4!ji"1 G'oim,.i:1JfJ{lUiciid/Q, SuNe!tlc! r,.'rl Myers. FlorldaS..?B12 2','319"9;;J9..10'R'()'iit ,1394)3944'9
_.lfIll#lNfrnUlftUt",'1
\2/St.lOOlC.1ll471 "'" O\I-4ME~
"'...
-'2-1".000. !WRl<.G5lI3
W)iMlj"tJ"f,;.i{~l,I{.:1 q, U~ fII U:"~~'~Jfr~frt),*
Wils(lnMiller
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 46
;\',If "":)'FSx.:!.VJ:r'; <\ :~f"i:'.~It~('i, <i,,'::;~::;i, ,; i.~);jitj:,-tt:1.i
EXHIBIT "2"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
HERITAGE BAY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Being a portion of Sections 13 & 24,
Township 48 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida
N.13"06'52"E., a distance of 80.21 feet; thence N.02"11'35"E., a distance of 51.22 feel; thence
N.57"4S'30'W., a distance of 31.60 feet; thence N.360Q4'22'W., a distance of 17.68 feet; thence
N.22003'21"W., a distance of 38,91 feet; thence N.38019'34'W., a distance of 62,73 feet; thence
N.Oe"48'48"E., a distance of 256.83 feet; thence N.56049'22"E., a distance of 230.89 feet; thence
N.3r06'38"E., a distance of 307.08 feet; thence N.01"33'58'W., a distance of 220.27 feet; thence
N,4705S'49/1E., a distance of 261.06 feet; thence S.50"20'34"E., a distance of 238.48 feet; thence
N.79"OS'16"E., a distance of 44.71 feet; thence N.66"54'3S"E., a distance of 198.99 feet; thence
N.8S"19'41"E., a distance of 30S.14 feet; thence S.81011'47"E., a distance of 382.30 feet; thence
S,58054'22"E., a distance of 212,84 feet; thence S.61055'11"E., a distance of 69.00 feet; thence
N.27"24'54"E., a distance of 326.91 feet; thence N.23a54'05"E., a distance of 52.09 feet; thence
N,06" 19'5S"E.. a distance of 45.01 feet; thence N.16000'11"W., a distance of 225.09 feet; thence
N.36039'53'W., a distance of 161.08 feet; thence N.53019'35"W., a distance of 170.55 feet; thence
N.87040'44'W., a distance of 222.13 feet; thence N.26013'42"E., a distance of 257.95 feet; thence
S.76033'40"E., a distance of 135.04 feet; thence N,50004'55''E., a distance of 317.50 feet; thence
N.47015'05"E., a distance of 238.71 feet; thence S.85043'54"E., a distance of 224.24 feet to a point on the
East line of Section 13; thence S.00oS7'28"E. along said East line of Section 13, a distance of 2,313,38
feet; thence S.01DOO'51"E., a distance of 1,348.99 feet; thence S.01001'37"E., a distance of 1,349.74 feet
to the Northeast comer of Section 24; thence S.01 o04'S2"E. along the East line of Section 24, a distance
of 1,336.42 feet; thence S.01"OS'01"E., a distance of 1,336.S2 feet; thence S.01014'S1"E., a distance of
2574.53 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 687,33 acres, more or less.
Subject to easements, restrictions, reservations and rights-of-way of record.
Bearings are based on the East line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 24 as being S01a14'51"E.
See attached sketch.
Prepared by:
r-:>
\5
Stephen '. rek, Professional Surv
Florida R '~raUon No. LS 3273
& Mapper
December 1. 2004
Date
Not valid without the signature and the original raised seal of a Florida licensed Surveyor and Mapper.
P.I.N.: N0442-211-000 GCCDD
Ref,: 0-0442-122
Date; December 1, 2004
121312004.35413 Ver. 01J... SEREI('
.-,
_211.001). I!WFlK. 1!lll3
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 19 of 46
Exhibit "3"
LANDOWNER'S CONSENT TO ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT
Bay Home USH, Inc. by and through its authorized representative, Brian Sabien Regional
Vice President, with its principal place of business at 10491 Six Mile Cypress Parkway, Fort
Myers, FL 33912, and Brian Sa bean is Vice President is the owner or controller of certain
property located in Collier County and more particularly described as follows:
See Exhibits "1" & "2" of the "Petition to Establish the Heritage Bay
Community Development District" incorporated herein by reference.
By signing below Brian Sabean, as owner, or controller of 100% of the proposed land to
be included in the HERITAGE OAKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
(''District''), as evidenced in the deed records of Collier County and/or as evidenced by
documentation attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, hereby gives full consent to
the establishment of the District by Collier County ordinance in accordance with section
190.005, Florida Statutes, and consents to the inclusion of its property within the proposed
boundaries of said District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this
day of
. 2004.
Brian Sabean
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
2004, by
Personally known
Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
Notary Public
(printed Name of Notary Public)
My commission expires:
K:\Usllt1ll\Kfolden\US HOMES \Heritage BA Y\Exhibit 3 consentwpd
<(LnCO
coo-:r
ci~O
zcio
E..-N
(l) >. (J.)
:t::ro~
ro~o..
-0
c
(J.)
Ol
<(
It)
fo-
as
:E
~
"-~'''''''''_"''''"_>ffl""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,",''';.,,"h;",",''',,,c,,.,,,,,;,,"_,...,..
f0-
e.>
~
I-
(I)
a
I-
Z
W
~
a.
o
...J
W
[lj
Cl
~
Z
:)
~
~
o
e.>
~
W
~
~
W
J:
W
...J
lD
~
W
~
~
Cl
W
~
~
~
(I)
W
Cl
Z
0(
~
(I)
o
o
W
...J
lD
;a
o
ct:
a.
U-
o
Z
o
z
a:
o
u.
o
>-
ct:
~
~
:)
(I)
..
W
ct:
~
e.>
~
ct:
I-
(I)
~
u.
~
E
.m
'"5
'0
'0
I/)
'0
I:
m
5
:5
.5
1i)
8
-
...J
~
o
I-
0)"'" N c:o 0000.....0
CONN 0"''''''''''0'''
OMO.....M 0)
fSirtSfSir.J..j r.J
............... ...
...
&~~i~~~~i~
N...
... ...
.....
8
N
~~~~~~~~~~
" . -... ...
"'N.
... ... ...
8
N
~(;:s:~n~~~~8~
CO.CCNM N
M M 0) ..." ..j ...:
............... ...
It)
8
N
>
ct:
~
~
a.
-
III
Cl
III
I:
'e
Cl
~
III
E (!)
11)'1: Z
i ~ ~ ~
.m (!) ~ ~
E I/)z:I: ct:
.a -8Q ~ W
~ :::I~...J a.
Sf ~(!) ~ ~
~ co::: 0( 0(
:5 ~~ ~~ffi
Sf WCl >~w
-g ~~ ct:$U-(I)
't5 (!) w""~~
I: ~o((!) (l)Ezo
c ct:z~ ...J~ow
~~~~~~~~~5
ClE~ffi~~t:5~g
~~~~~fd~tu~~
ct:~uJ3:....J(I)W~a.~
~
o
~
M
~
...
co
:8
fSi
...
~
q
...
...
.....
...
..
...
...
...
M
~
r.J
...
;!
...
~
G)
>
.8
III
CD
:5
-
S
>-
e.>
z
w
(!)
Z
~
Z
o
e.>
'#.
o
...
~
~
0:::
a.
~
g
~
i
;be
I:~
o III
i .5
ii
~Q)
~'O
"2-g
III I/)
0)_
~~
:=,:)
1/)""':"
CD ~
i~
(l)1!'
1Ili6l!
:g '9. !.
~ !.l!?
.....I/)e.
" -.8
~rl!=
(; ....:;..j
. NS
8~rIl
"'C!8
cO
~0~'5
-:::I
:::I I/)
~.8'O
III III III
-g~iU
:::I 0 E
,- :0=
! .~ Sf
-'00
E III I:
!~ 1f
~E~
III 0 .-
;J:-Cl
8. '2 CD
_CD:5
lIle_
"iCDO
I/)~i
III .~
o !
:5 :::I
.... I/)
.g '0
; 'E
i i
~ '0
8 a
'0 1$
~ i
e.
~ ~
E '0
= III
Ul E
w .8
>.
III
E
....
o
.le
..
.....:..
...
-
N
...
o
g
...
e
o
~
Ul
.5
€
.g
i
.le
I!!
j
,5
to)
.in
III
.c
i6
....
.g
Ul
oS
III
E
i
CI)
f=
..
i;.
e
::l
8
CD
.c
>.
III
E
iU
:5
Ul
~
::l
:=:
'0
I:
CI)
!
Cl
Cl
e.>
III
:0
,~
Q.
e.
l\l
....
III
~
l5
~
~
1il
~
3
.5
1il
8
Cl
e
'~
!'S
S
'5.
~
I
'0
:0=
e
III
CD
'0
::l
't5
.5
'0
e
o
'0
e
.~
CD
.c
j
III
E
:0=
[fi
~
8
CD
:0
!
e .
~~
f= 8
.. ,5
....
.~
~
~
i
'0
.:;
e
e.
III
.c
'i
....
i
Ul
'0
e
III
....
3
;
j
l\l
e.
;g
I:
III
.le
:=:
>.
=
e
~
::l
e.>
..
~ I
lfl _
~ Ii
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 46
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Scope
This statement of estimated regulatory costs ("SERC") supports the petition to establish the
Heritage Bay Community Development District ("District"). The District comprises
approximately 687 +/- acres of land within Collier County, Florida on which approximately
409 single family, 826 multifamily dwelling units, 200 assisted living units, 55,000 square
feet of office space, and 175,000 square feet of commercial space are planned for
development. The limitations on the scope of this SERC are set out in Chapters 120 and
190 F.S. (2004) (specifically, Sections 190.046(1)(a), 190.oo5(1)(a)8, and 120.541(2)).
Moreover, Section 190.002(2)(d), F.S. (2004), provides .'that the process of establishing
such a district pursuant to uniform general law shall be fair and based only on factors
material to managing and financing the service delivery function of the district, so that any
matter conceminlZ pennittinlZ or plannin~ of the development is not material or relevant
(emphasis added)."
1.2 Overview of the Heritage Bay Community Development District
The District is designed to provide community infrastructure, services, and facilities along
with their operations and maintenance.
-... The development plan for the proposed lands within the District includes the construction of
approximately 409 single family, 826 multifamily dwelling units, 200 assisted living units,
55,000 square feet of office space, and 175,000 square feet of commercial space.
1.3 Requirements for the Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
Section 120.541(2), F.S. (2004), defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory
costs must contain:
(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to
comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to
be affected by the rule.
(b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local
government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated
effect on state and local revenues.
(c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and
entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply with the requirements of
the rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional costs" are direct costs that are readily
ascertainable based upon standard business practices, and include filing fees, the cost of
obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures
1
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 22 of 46
required to be employed in complying with the mle, additional operating costs incurred, and
the cost of monitoring and reporting.
(d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined be Section 288.703. F.S.
(2004). and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by
Section 120.52, F.S. (2004). Collier County is not defined as a small county for purposes of
this requirement.
( e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful.
(f) In the statement or revised statement, whichever applies, a description of any good faith
written proposal submitted under paragraph (1)(a) and either a statement adopting the
alternative or a statement of the reasons for rejecting the alternative in favor of the proposed
rule.
2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to
comply with the ordinance, together with a general description of the types of
individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance.
As noted above, Heritage Bay is designed for approximately 409 single family, 826
multifamily dwelling units, 200 assisted living units, 55,000 square feet of office space, and
175,000 square feet of commercial space. Establishment of the District would put all of the
households that locate within the community under the jurisdiction of the District. Of
course, the decision to locate within the District is a voluntary one.
3.0 A good faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities of implementing
and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on state and local
revenues.
3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance
State Government Entities
The District consists of fewer than 1,000 acres; therefore the Collier County is the
establishing entity under Section 190.005(2), F.S. (2004). There will be only modest costs
to various State governmental entities to implement and enforce the proposed establishment
of the District.
The modest costs to various State entities to implement and enforce the proposed ordinance
relate strictly to receipt and processing of various reports that the proposed District is
required to file with the State and its various entities. Appendix A lists the reporting
requirements. The costs to those State agencies that will receive and process the District's
reports are very small, because the District is only one of several hundred governmental
units that are required to submit the various reports. Therefore, the marginal cost of
processing one additional set of reports is de minimis. Additionally, pursuant to Section
189.412, F.S. (2004). the proposed District must pay an annual fee to the State of Florida
Department of Community Affairs to offset such costs.
2
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 23 of 46
Collier County
The land within the District is within the unincorporated limits of Collier County and
consists of fewer than 1,000 acres. The Collier County Board of Commissioners and Collier
County staff will process, analyze, conduct a public hearing, and vote upon the petition to
establish the District. These activities will absOIb some resources.
These costs to the County are modest for a number of reasons. First, review of the petition
to establish the District does not include analysis of the project itself. Second, the petition
itself provides much of the information needed for a staff review. Third, Collier County
already possesses the staff needed to conduct the review without the need for new staff.
Fourth, there is no capital required to review the petition. Fifth, local governments routinely
process similar petitions for land uses and zoning changes that are far more complex than is
the petition to establish a community development district. Finally, costs related to staff's
time to process the petition to establish the District have been offset by the $15,000 filing
fee that is paid to the County.
The annual costs to Collier County, because of the establishment of the District, are also
very small and within control of the County. The proposed District is an independent unit of
local government. The only annual costs the County faces are the minimal costs of
receiving and to the extent it wishes, reviewing the various reports that the District is
required to provide to the County.
3.2 Impa~t on State and Local Revenues
Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or local revenues.
The District is an independent unit of local government with limited powers. It is designed
by law to provide community facilities and services to the lands that comprise the Heritage
Bay area. It has its own sources of revenue. No State or local subsidies are required or
expected.
In this regard it is important to note that any debt obligations incurred by the District to
construct its infrastructure, or for any other reason, are not debts of the State of Florida or
any other unit of local government. In accordance with State law, debts of the CDD are
strictly its own responsibility.
4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and
entities required to comply with the requirements of the ordinance.
Table 1 provides an outline of the various facilities and services the proposed District may
provide. The District plans to fund, own, operate, and maintain the community's
strormwater management system, public landscaping improvements, and related irrigation
improvements. The District also plans to construct and finance the internal roadway system,
water distribution system, and waste water system. It is anticipated that these facilities will
be turned over to the Collier County for ownership and maintenance.
3
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 24 of 46
Table 1. Heritage Bay Community Development District Proposed Facilities and
Services
FACILITY FUNDEDI O&M OWNERSmp
CONSTRUCTED
Water Distribution & COD Collier County Collier County
Sewer Collection Systems
Roads CDD CDD COD
Stonnwater Management CDD COD CDD
System
Landscape & Entrance COD COD CDD
The petitioner has estimated the costs for providing the capital facilities outlined in Table 1.
The cost estimates are shown in Table 2 below. Total costs for these facilities are estimated
to be approximately $44,378,000. To fund this construction program the District may issue
special assessments or other revenue bonds estimated to total $57,700,000. These would be
repaid through non-ad valorem assessments levied on all developable property within the
District that specially benefit from the District's capital improvement program as outlined in
Table 1.
Table 2. Summary of Estimated Capital Costs Heritage Bay Community Development
District
Category
Roadway
Utilities
Earthwork
Water Management
Landscaping & Irrigation
Professional Fees & Permitting
1 ()o1o Contingency
Construction
Estimate
$6,069,000
8,327,000
16,022,000
2,708,000
4,3 I 0,000
2,907,000
4.035.000
$44,378,000
Total
Prospective future landowners in the District may be required to pay non-ad valorem
assessments levied by the District to secure the debt incurred through bond issuance. In
addition to the levy of non-ad valorem assessments for debt service, the District may also
impose a non-ad valorem assessment to fund the operations and maintenance of the District
and its facilities and services.
It is important to note that the various costs outlined in Table 2 are typical for developments
of the type contemplated. There is nothing peculiar about the District's financing that
requires additional infrastructure over and above what would nonnally be needed.
Therefore, these costs are not in addition to nonnal development costs. District-imposed
assessments for operations and maintenance costs are similar to what would be charged by a
4
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 25 of 46
property owner's association common to most mixed-use developments except they are
government enforced first liens.
Real estate markets are quite efficient, because buyers and renters evaluate all of the costs
and benefits associated with various alternative locations. Therefore, market forces preclude
developers from marking up the prices of their products beyond what the competition
allows. To remain competitive the operations and maintenance assessments must also be in
line with the costs imposed by the competition.
Furthermore, the decision to locate within the District is completely voluntary. These
potential residents are given full disclosure of the existence of the district and level of
anticipated assessments. So ultimately, all owners and users of the affected property chose
to accept the District's costs in tradeoff for the benefits that the District provides. A
Community Development District ("CDD") provides residents with the option of having
higher levels of facilities and services financed through self-imposed charges. The District
is an alternative means to finance necessary community services. District financing is no
more expensive, and often less expensive, than the alternatives of a municipal service taxing
unit (MSTU), a neighborhood association, County provision (directly or via a dependent
special district), or through developer equity and/or bank loans.
It should be noted that occupants of the lands within the District will receive three major
classes of benefits.
First, those residents and businesses in the District will receive a higher level of public
services and amenities sooner than would otherwise be the case.
Second, a CDD is a mechanism to ensure that the community services and amenities will be
completed concurrently with development of lands within the District. This satisfies the
revised growth management legislation, and it assures that growth pays for itself without
undue burden on other consumers. Establishment of the District will ensure that these
landowners pay for the provision of facilities, services and improvements to these lands.
Third, a CDD is the sole form of governance which allows District landowners, through
landowner voting and ultimately electoral voting for resident elected boards, to determine
the type, quality and expense of District services they receive, provided they meet the
County's overall requirements.
5,0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S.
(2004). and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by
Section 120.52, F.S. (2004).
There will be no impact on small businesses because of the establishment of the District. If
anything, the impact may be positive. This is because the District must competitively bid
certain contracts. This affords small businesses the opportunity to bid on District work.
Collier County has an estimated population (not incarcerated) in 2005 that is greater than
75,000. Therefore the County is not defined as a "small" county according to Section
120.52, F.S.
5
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 26 of 46
6.0 Any Additional useful information.
The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic theory,
especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits. Input was
received from the developer's engineer and other professionals associated with the
developer.
Finally, it is useful to reflect upon the question of whether the proposed District is the best
alternative to provide community facilities and services to the project. As an alternative to
the District, Collier County could approve a dependent special district for the area, such as
an MSBU or a special taxing district. Either of these alternatives could finance the
improvements contemplated in Table 1 in a fashion similar to the proposed District.
There are a number of reasons why a dependent district is not the best alternative for
providing community facilities and services to Heritage Bay. First, unlike the District, the
alternatives would require Collier County to administer the project and its facilities and
services. As a result, the costs for these services and facilities would not be sequestered to
the land directly benefiting from them, as the case would be with the District.
Administering a project of the size and complexity of the development program anticipated
for Heritage Bay is a significant and expensive undertaking.
Second, a District is preferable from a government accountability perspective. With a
District, residents and landowners in the District would have a focused unit of government
ultimately under their direct control. The District can then be more responsive to resident
needs without disrupting other County responsibilities. By contrast, if Collier County was to
establish a dependent district then the residents and landowners of Heritage Bay would take
their grievances and desires to the County Commission meetings.
Third, any debt of a District is strictly the District's responsibility. While it may be
technically true that the debt of a County-established dependent, special district is not
strictly the County's responsibility, any financial problems that the special district may have
will inevitably entangle the County. This will not be the case if a District is established.
Another alternative to the District would be for a property owner's association to provide the
infrastructure, operations, and maintenance of community facilities and services. A District
is superior to a POA for a variety of reasons. First, unlike a POA a District can obtain low
cost funds from the municipal capital markets. Second, the District can impose and collect
its assessments along with other property taxes. Therefore, the District is far more assured
of obtaining its needed funds than is a POA. Third, the proposed District is a unit of local
government. This provides a higher level of oversight and accountability.
Fishkind and Associates certifies that this SERC meets the requirements for a Statement of
Estimated Regulatory Costs as set out in Section 120.541, F.S. (2004).
6
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 27 of 46
We have developed over 25 SERCs. Below is a list ofiive of these.
. Urban Orlando Community Development District
. Marshall Creek Community Development District
. Cedar Hammock Community Development District
. Meditera Community Development District
. Brooks Community Development District
Prepared by:
Carey Garland
Fishkind and Associates, Inc.
7
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 28 of 46
APPENDIX A
LIST OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
FLORIDA
STATUTE
REPORT CITE DATE
Annual Financial Audit 11.45 within 9 months following end of
fiscal year
218.39 within 12 months after end of
fiscal year
Annual Financial Report (AFR) 218.32 (d) no later than 12 months after
end of fiscal year or (e) no later
than April 30
TRIM Compliance Report 200.068 no later than 30 days after adoption
of resolution establishing property
tax. levy
Form 1 - Limited Financial Disclosure 112.3144 by July 1
Public Depositor 280.17 by November 30
Proposed Budget 190.008 at least 60 days prior to adoption
Public Facilities Report 189.415 within one year of creation; annual
updates thereafter
Public Meeting Schedule 189.417 quarterly, semiannually or annually
Bond Report 218.38 when issued; within 120 days after
delivery of bonds
Registered Agent 189.416 30 days after first meeting
8
""...,."....""""'".""",,.-,.'......"';__lllii...i'I........,"..';;f;jUl_'"'H"",..,,,,~.
Agenda Item No, 8A
May 10. 2005
Page 29 of 46
Exhibit "9"
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The Uniform Community Development District Act of 1980, chapter 190, Florida
Statutes (2002 and hereafter except as otherwise noted)("Fla. Stat. hereafter"), restricts and limits
expressly the exercise of the state-created District's exercise of its state charter powers. The
petitioner acknowledges that the District's Board of Supervisors is bound legally and ethically to
exercise its general and special powers subject to, and not inconsistent with, the laws and
regulations contained in the Collier County Water-Sewer District Special Act, and any applicable
P.U.D., preliminary subdivision plat and/or development order as provided in sections 190.004
and 190.012, Fla. Stat.
In light of the statutory restrictions and mandates upon the powers
and functions of a community district discussed below, the District will not and cannot diminish
the customer base of the Collier County Water-Sewer District. Collier County under its
ordinance is the permanent provider of water and sewer service to the development on which the
Community Development District will be established.
Also, the 1988 Special Act reestablishing the Collier County Water-Sewer District
provides in Section 21 that: 1) Collier County can mandate connection to its water and sewer
facilities; 2) Collier County can require installation and dedication of water and sewer facilities
to the County; and 3) no water and sewer facilities can be built within the water-sewer district
unless the Collier County Commissioners sitting as the Water-Sewer District Board gives its
consent and approval.
1
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 30 of 46
The land area which the District will serve is in the jurisdiction of the dependent Collier
County Water-Sewer District and is subject therefore to the terms of the 1988 Special Act. The
community to be served by the District is also subject to P.ll.D. and preliminary subdivision plat.
In addition, the land area involved is also subject to Collier County Ordinance No. 98-69, as
amended, utility facilities requirements, as well as the state, regional and local comprehensive
plans, permitting agencies and all related land development regulations.
The Florida Legislature, in section 190.oo2(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991), has found expressly
that the Community Development District is a solution to the management and capital
infrastructure financing problems faced by counties. In solving these problems, the Community
Development District also provides a method of servicing projected growth without over
burdening other local governments and their taxpayers. The Legislature has found the
Community Development District, a management entity, is a legitimate solution to infrastructure
delivery challenges.
It is also the expressed policy of the legislature that Community Development Districts
are ".... a legitimate alternative method available for use by the private and public sectors, as
authorized by state law, to manage and finance basic services for community development." s.
190.002(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). This quoted language means that the District is a management
tool for both Collier County and the petitioner. This management tool is to be used by both the
developer and the county as authorized in chapter 190, Fla. Stat.
In section 190.002(1)(b), Fla. Stat., the Legislature has found also that it is in the public
interest that"... the operation of such a district and the exercise by the district of its powers be
consistent with applicable due process, disclosure, accountability, ethics and govemment-in-the-
sunshine requirements." This law means that no decision of the Board of Supervisors can be
2
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 31 of 46
made in secret, and that Collier County will be given ample noticed opportunities to monitor the
exercise of the Board of Supervisors' special limited management powers, including those
dealing with water and sewer services. In other words, this language mandates that the district
board of supervisors as a local government works with the Collier County local government.
In regard to possible conflicts between general pwpose local government laws and
actions of this Community Development District local government, the Legislature has stated
expressly as its policy that the exercise by the district of its powers "...comply with all applicable
governmental laws, roles, regulations and policies governing planning and permitting of the
development to be serviced by the district to ensure that neither the establishment nor operation
of such a district is a development order under chapter 380, Fla. Stat., and that the district so
established does not have any zoning or permitting powers governing developments." s.
190.002(2)(c), Fla. Stat. In addition, section 190.003, Fla. Stat., provides that a Community
Development District shall function in such a manner "...that all applicable planning and
permitting, rules, regulations and policies control the development of the land to be serviced by
the District."
Even more illustrative of the Legislature's intent is its dispositive language in the
"preemptive and sole authority" section of the Uniform Community Development District Act.
s. 190.004(3), Fla. Stat.
First, the statute states specifically that "...[a]l1 governmental, planning, environmental
and land use development laws, regulations and ordinances apply to all development of the land
within a Community Development District II Id. Since the Collier County Water-Sewer District
Special Act is a law of Florida, it applies to all development within the land to be serviced by the
proposed Community Development District. Since "all developmentll includes by definition
3
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 32 of 46
utility and other services, the Collier County Water- Sewer District requirements apply to aU
developments in the applicable land area, even after the establishment of the Community
Development District.
Second, the preemption section mandates directly and specifically that "a District shall
take no action which is inconsistent with applicable comprehensive plans, ordinances, or
regulations of the applicable local general purpose governments." Id This direct mandate is to
the Board of Supervisors of the Community Development District that it shall take no action
inconsistent with the Collier County Water- Sewer District Special Act. Accordingly, the Board
members will be under ethical and legal duties, subject to malfeasance, non-feasance, and
misfeasance of office, to take no action inconsistent with the Collier County laws and regulations
affecting the water-sewer district customer base.
Last, those special powers of the Community Development District, which may be
exercised only after obtaining the consent of the local jurisdiction, are also limited severely by
section 190.012, Fla. Stat. This section provides in pertinent part that the District Board of
Supervisors It...may exercise [these and all its special powers], subject to the regulatory
jurisdiction and permitting authority of all applicable governmental bodies, agencies and special
districts having authority to any area included therein..." Id. Here, the Legislature has answered
directly the question of whether the District can act inconsistent with the regulations of the
Collier County Water-Sewer District The exercise of the District's powers are "subject" to those
of the Collier County Water-Sewer District.
K.:IUsers\KfoldenIUS HOMES\Herltage BA Y\Collier County water sew",. acknowledsmenl. wpd
4
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 33 of 46
TESTIMONY OF CARRON DAY, PLANNER
Planning Review
Establishment of the Heritage Bay Community Development District
A petition for establishing the Heritage Bay Community Development District (COD) has
been filed with the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. The purpose of this
report is to provide the Collier County Commission with the planning perspective relative to
the proposed COD.
My qualifications for providing this planning perspective are outlined in the attached resume.
I am a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners. I have been working as an
urban and regional planner in Southwest Florida since 1974. My work has included land
development activities, Developments of Regional Impact, comprehensive plan
amendments, zonings and the use of Community Development Districts. I have a Master of
City and Regional Planning degree from the Illinois Institute of Technology and have been
qualified in Florida administrative hearings and in various Florida county commissions and
city councils as an expert in zoning and land use matters and in local, regional, and state
growth management planning including the planning for alternative ways to provide
community development infrastructure.
Based on my experience and training in this field, I have addressed the planning aspects
and consequences of alternative means of providing infrastructure to the proposed property
of the Heritage Bay Community Development. I have assisted in the preparation of the
Petition to establish the Heritage Bay Community Development District, its required exhibits
and additional information pertinent to the planning consequences of establishing the
District. This paper is a summary of the planning consequences of establishing the
proposed District on the identified property within Collier County, Florida.
Regarding the petition to establish the Heritage Bay COD, I have reviewed the following:
1. Chapter 187, Florida Statutes, the State Comprehensive Plan.
2. The Collier County Comprehensive Plan.
3. Chapter 189, Florida Statutes, the Uniform Special District Accountability Act.
4. Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, the Uniform Community Development District Act.
Additionally, I have observed the proposed site of the Heritage Bay COD and reviewed the
Petition to Establish the Heritage Bay COD.
This is a review of establishing the Heritage Bay COD on the proposed land and, from a
planning perspective, the suitability or appropriateness of establishing a Community
Development District for the Heritage Bay Community. Section 190.005, Florida Statutes,
lists six specific factors that must be considered when making a determination regarding a
petition to establish a COD. These factors are:
1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true and
correct.
2. Whether the establishment of the district is inconsistent with any applicable element
or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government
comprehensive plan.
3. Whether the area of the land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is
sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one
functional interrelated community.
1217_14l1311S VooOZ.COAY
COM
~llll'B'B -0
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 34 of 46
4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district.
5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the district will be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
6. Whether the area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate special-
district government.
The proposed land area for the Heritage Bay COO includes approximately 686% acres with a
total of 1250 units arranged as a mix of residential building types. The community is located
just east of the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Collier Boulevard (County Road
951) and Immokalee Road. The community includes residential neighborhoods, a
clubhouse, recreational areas, open space tracts, stormwater facilities, wetland preserves,
roadways and necessary water and sewer facilities. The community is area designated
Rural Fringe Mixed Use with an Urban-Rural Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay
(URFTZO) in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and on the Future Land Use Map.
This planning consideration of the COO, relative to the six statutory decision factors, is
based on the COO exercising all of its statutory powers authorized in Section 190.012, F.S.
FACTOR ONE
Whether all statements contained within this petition have been found to be true and
correct.
I have observed the Heritage Bay site and reviewed the Petition for Establishing the
Heritage Bay COO. To the best of my knowledge, the statements contained within the
Petition are true and correct. There are no special planning problems evident from my
review,
FACTOR TWO
Whether the establishment of the district Is Inconsistent with any applicable element
or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government
comprehensive plan.
The State and Collier County Comprehensive Plans were reviewed for goals, objectives,
and policies that pertain to the establishment of a COO, These goals, objectives, and
policies were then reviewed specifically in relationship to proposed establishment of the
Heritage Bay COO, Based on this review, establishment of the Heritage Bay COO is not
inconsistent with applicable elements or portions of the State and Collier County
Comprehensive Plans.
This review did not consider comprehensive plan goals, objectives, or policies that do not
pertain to the establishment of a COD. State and Collier County Comprehensive Plan goals,
objectives, and policies pertaining to establishment of the COD and specific application to
the proposed establishment of the Heritage Bay COO are provided below:
12/7J2004- '45383 Veo oz.. COAY
""'"
ZUCII5II1IilJ6...0
2
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 35 of 46
THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Sublect and Goal (18)
(18) PUBLIC FACILITIES
(a) Goal. - Florida shall protect the substantial Investments In public facilities that
already exist and shall plan for and finance new facilities to serve residents In a
timely, orderly, and efficient manner.
Policy 18(b) 3. Allocate the costs of new public facilities on the basis of the benefits
received by existing and future residents.
Establishment of the Heritage Bay COD will allocate the cost of new facilities to the users of
such facilities and specifically the owners of property within the district.
Policy 18(b) 4. - Create a partnership among state government, local governments,
and the private sector which would Identify and build needed public facilities and
allocate the costs of such facilities among the partners In proportion to the benefits
accruing to each of them.
Establishment of the Heritage Bay COD creates a partnership between Collier County, the
Heritage Bay COD, and the developer for the management and funding of the community
facilities and the allocation of their costs to the facility users.
Policy 18(b) 5. - Encourage local government financial self-sufficiency In providing
publiC facilities.
The proposed Heritage Bay COD will be a financially self-sufficient local governmental entity
that will provide the community facilities for the Heritage Bay development.
Policy 18(b) 6. - Identify and Implement Innovative but fiscally sound and cost-
effective community facility financing techniques.
Establishment of the Heritage Bay COD will result in a fiscally sound and cost-effective
community facility financing technique by assessing the cost of facilities and services directly
to the property owners within the COO. These property owners are also the specific users of
the facilities and services.
Policy 18(b) 7. - Encourage the development, use, and coordination of capital
Improvement plans by all levels of government.
Section 189.415, Florida Statutes, requires special districts to coordinate with local general-
purpose govemment and to submit and update a public facilities report. This public facilities
report must include information very similar to the capital improvement plans of most local
general-purpose governments. The local general-purpose government may use and rely
upon the district report.
Policy 18(b) 9. - Identify and use stable revenue sources which are also responsive to
growth for financing public facilities.
Establishment of the Heritage Bay COD provides stable community facility revenue sources
that are directly responsive to growth. This will occur as the community is developed. Within
the COD fees will be assessed to property owners. These fees are collected to finance the
management, installation and maintenance of community infrastructure and amenities.
12/7_ 1_' Vet: 021- CDAY
OMIOI
--.....0
3
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 36 of 46
Subject and Goal 20
(20)TRANSPORT A T10N
(a) Goal. . Florida shall direct future transportation Improvements to aid In the
management of growth and shall have a state transportation system that Integrate
highway, air, mass transit, and other transportation modes.
Pollcy20(a) 6.. Promote timely resurfacing and repair of roads and bridges to
minimize costly reconstruction and to enhance safety.
Establishment of a COO will provide a stable revenue source for maintenance of the District
roadways and bridges that will provide timely resurfacing and repairs. The COD will include
a Board of Supervisors that own property within the COO and therefore will be focused on
efficient management of such roadway maintenance.
Subject and Goal 21. .
(21) GOVERNMETAL EFFICIENCY
(a) Goal. . Florida governments shall economically and efficiently provide the amount
and quality of services required by the public.
Polley 21 (a) 2. Allow the creation of Independent special taxing districts which have
uniform general law standards and procedures and do not overburden other
governments and their taxpayers while preventing the proliferation of Independent
special taxing districts which do not meet these standards.
Establishment of the Heritage Bay COD is a direct application of this policy.
Polley 21(a) 3. Encourage the use of municipal services taxing units and other
dependent special districts to provide needed Infrastructure where the fiscal capacity
exists to support such an approach.
The creation of the COD will create a "so called" special taxing district in order to generate
revenues to be specifically earmarked for facilities and services within the Heritage Bay
community. The creation of this COD will assess the cost for these services to the users
and specifically exclude other taxpayers outside the district.
Polley 21(a) 8. Replace multiple, small scale, economically Inefficient local public
facilities with regional facilities where they are proven to be more economical,
particularly in terms of energy efficiency, and yet can retain the quality of service
expected by the public.
The Heritage Bay COD proposal provides for use of regional facilities for potable water
supply and sewage treatment. At the same time, the COD will provide local, quality,
responsive maintenance services for the local infrastructure and facilities such as roadways
and water management facilities,
Subject and Goal 26(a).
(26)PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
(a) Systematic planning capabilities shall be Integrated Into all levels of government
In Florida with particular emphasis on Improving Intergovernmental coordination and
maximizing citizen involvement.
Polley 26(a) 6. Encourage citizen participation at all levels of policy development,
planning and operations.
The establishment of the Heritage Bay COD ensures that the local citizens in the district
actively participate in the operations of the community facilities within the COD.
t2l7/2OlM-l483l13 _ 021- COAY
""""
ZlI5..55116-.0
4
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 37 of 46
COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Collier County Collier County Growth Management Plan is set forth in Collier County
Ordinance 2000-25. as amended, This Plan is currently in force and effective in Collier
County subject to general law. No county plan or ordinance, under charter home rule or
non-charter home rule, may be inconsistent with the plan or any other general law.
Therefore, the county plan may not be inconsistent with Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, the
express general law by which the community development district was created and pursuant
to which it is to be established by county ordinance on the proposed property.
Under the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development
Regulation Act, Chapter 163, part II, Florida Statutes. as amended, the Plan consists of
various components, elements and other designations. By way of methodology, I applied
each special power available to the Community Development District under all of Section
190.012, Florida Statutes, to every element, component, section and other aspect of the
Collier County Comprehensive Plan. I have applied this Plan as a planner in order to
determine whether there is any particular inconsistency with the Plan from creation and
establishment of the District.
The detailed methodology I used to make this determination is similar to that I outlined with
regard to the State Plan. First, I eliminated certain goals, objectives, policies. elements,
components, sections and portions, which do not address creating and establishing the
District on the proposed property; I also rejected those which relate strictly to community
developments. These subjects are irrelevant to the creation and establishment of the
District. After eliminating these matters, 1 identified and evaluated the remaining parts of the
Plan as to whether creation and establishment of the District, exercising any and all of its
special powers, would be inconsistent.
As to these goals, policies, components, elements, sections and other aspects of the Plan
which relate to creation and establishment of the District, I noted fIVe for the purposes of this
planning analysis.
The establishment of the Community Development District, whose purpose is to provide its
governmental services attendant to Heritage Bay basic infrastructure, complies fully with the
goals, objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
Capital Improvements Element
Objective 1.2:
FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility Improvements
necessitated by growth. Future Developments payments may take the form of
Impact fees, dedication of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of
user fees, special assessments and taxes.
Fees to the County and property taxes and non-ad valorem special assessments and fees
and charges to the District.
Public Facilities Element--Potable Water Subelement
Policy 1.2.6: Where Community Development Districts, or other similar special districts are
established to provide a tool for developers to provide infrastructure or other purposes,
wholly or partially within the Collier County Water-Sewer District, water service shall be
1217~1413l13 v.r:O:ll.CDAY
COIOI
_.....0
5
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 38 of 46
connected to the regional system, and internal facilities shall be conveyed when acceptable
to the Collier County Water-Sewer District for operation and ownership...
Heritage Bay District will provide and maintain potable water infrastructure to support the
proposed development, and will connect the system to Collier County consistent with the
Collier County Utilities Ordinance. The District is consistent with this Policy.
Recreation and Open Space Element
Objective 1.4: Continue formal mechanism to improve and coordinate efforts among levels
of government and the private sector in order to provide recreational opportunities.
Heritage Bay District will provide extensive passive and active recreation and open space
facilities throughout the project site. The project will include natural preserves, lakes, parks,
and active recreation facilities such as tennis, swimming, and health club. Heritage Bay
District, through its management and related financing of value enhancing improvements, is
consistent with the Collier County Policy 1.4 in its commitment to provide on-site recreational
facilities,
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
Goal 1 and Objective 1.1.: Provide for the continual exchange of Information and the
use of any Intergovernmental coordination mechanisms to achieve compatible and
coordinated plans.
Heritage Bay has extensively coordinated with various public and private sector agencies in
the delivery of services, such as Collier County and Florida Power and Light to insure that
services are coordinated and non-duplicative.
Once established, the Heritage Bay District may enter into an interlocal government
agreement such as the one effected in Collier County as a rule with the Collier County
Water-Sewer Dependent District.
Future Land Use Element
Objective 5 and Polley 5.1: In order to promote sound planning, ensure compatibility
of land uses and further the Implementation of the Future Land Use Element. All
rezonlngs must be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
Heritage Bay is a mixed use master planned community, which has utilized the Planned Unit
Development zoning district alternative to establish the development program, and the
establishment of the Community Development District to provide specialized local
governmental infrastructure systems, facilities and services. The project site is located in
the area designated for Urban Residential Fringe development on the County Future Land
Use Map. The project is consistent with the permitted land uses, densities and policies of
the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, and the
Community Development District is consistent with these policies because the District plans,
implements, constructs and maintains, both short-term and long-term, basic systems,
facilities and services implementing to the county capital improvement element which is tied
to the county future land use element.
Having thoroughly reviewed the Plan of Collier County as it may be related to the creation
and establishment of a District pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, I found that the
'2/T12OO4-1411311J v.Co 021- CDAY
......
%8. ISW!&--O
6
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 39 of 46
District on the proposed property is not inconsistent with goals, objectives, policies, sections
or portions which were found not to be applicable to the establishment of a District.
Based upon the aforementioned findings, the creation and establishment of the District on
the proposed property would not be inconsistent with any goals, policies, sections or
portions of the Plan. even if it were to exercise any and all of its statutory powers. In fact,
the District would further the Plan in general, and many of its specific components.
Further, the creation and establishment of the District would not be inconsistent with those
parts of the Plan. which do not relate to the creation and establishment of a District.
FACTOR THREE
Whether the area of land within the proposed district Is of sufftclent size, Is
sufficiently compact, and Is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one
functional Interrelated community.
This factor deals with whether the proposed land area characteristics of the land within the
COD are favorable to development of a functional interrelated community at Heritage Bay.
The Heritage Bay community, as master planned is an interrelated community. The
community is interrelated in that it shares recreational facilities, water distribution and sewer
collection facilities, a stormwater drainage system and a roaclway network. The land
characteristics of size. compactness, and contiguity are important in assessing whether this
interrelated community can be functional.
The size of the Heritage Bay COO area is approximately 686:1: acres. This is, in my opinion,
of sufficient size to function as an interrelated and self-sustaining community. The master
planning that has been completed proves that the community facilities can be physically
located within the area in an efficient manner.
The proposed land area of the COD has a gross residential density of 1.82 dwelling units
per acre. These units are arranged in compact clusters of distinct neighborhoods. This is
sufficiently compact to not present any inefficiencies in providing for the functional needs of
the community.
The contiguity of the area is, perhaps, the most important factor in accessing the feasibility
of establishing a functional, interrelated community. Areas separated by significant
distances or connected only by long. narrow strips of land would not be conducive to either
a functional or an interrelated community. The proposed Heritage Bay COD area is
favorable to development of a functional interrelated community because it is one
contiguous area of a very efficient, almost rectangular shape.
The sufficiency of size, compactness, and contiguity of the proposed land area on which the
petition seeks to have the county establish the Heritage Bay COD works to create favorable
conditions for development of a functional interrelated community.
FACTOR SIX
Whether the area that will be served by the district Is amenable to separate special.
district government.
Since Factor 6 deals with land area issues similar to Factor 3, it will be addressed here.
Whether the land area is "amenable" or suitable to separate special-district government
goes beyond size, compactness, and contiguity concerns. The location of the proposed
1217121I04- I_S Yec. 021- CDAY
.......
_lIlll_.O
7
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 40 of 46
CDD area, especially as it relates to other pUblic facility and service providers, is also
important in assessing the suitability of the area for a COO. In the Heritage Bay case, the
development is designated Rural Fringe Mixed Use with an Urban-Rural Rural Fringe
Transition Zone Overlay (URFTZO) in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and on the
Future Land Use Map. Although the community is located within the boundaries of planned
growth, it is situated far enough away from the urban center of Collier that service quality
may not be regularly monitored when compared to a community in a more urbanized setting.
This location makes this area especially suitable or amenable to special-district govemment
because the special-district approach will provide very locally-focused attention on the
facility and service needs of the community.
The land area as proposed for establishment of the state created charted district is
amenable to separate district governance because it is sufficienUy compact, contiguous and
of sufficient size, can be developed as one functional interrelated community, and there is
no incompatibility with existing or proposed local or regional facilities on the property.
Additionally, the proposed land for the COD is located adjacent to existing County-owned
environmental lands which provide unique opportunities and characteristics to the
community. Local, special-district govemment will be aware and attentive to these peculiar
characteristics.
FACTOR FIVE
Whether the community development services and facilities of the district will be
Incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
From a planning standpoint, the CDD must operate within the policies in the Collier County
Comprehensive Plan and the development approval processes in place to ensure
compliance with the Plan. These policies and processes will ensure that the community
development services and facilities of the district will be compatible with the capacity and
uses of existing local and regional community development services. For example, capacity
and level of service issues are addressed in the County's concurrency management system.
Additionally, the Collier County Comprehensive Plan sets standards for public water and
sewer facilities. The County will operate and maintain the water and sewer systems while
the CDD manages roadways and other community facilities. Based on this review and the
County regulations and policies that must comply with the Heritage Bay development, this
CDD's services and facilities are compatible with existing community development services
and facilities.
FACTOR FOUR
Whether the district Is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district.
Factor 4 is being considered last because the responses to all the other factors form a basis
for the response to this factor. In commenting on whether the COD is the best alternative for
delivering services and facilities in the Heritage Bay area, the following alternatives were
considered:
1. Provision of services and facilities through the private development and a
homeowner's association. 2. Provision of services and facilities by Collier County Government, or managed by
Collier County and funded through a Municipal Services Taxing Unit or Municipal
1217/200<1. 1_ \Ie.. 021- COAY
......
ZlIIIlllIlllHIllI-O
8
"-.'ri_,_",Oij__"""",",,,,_i4t~"'''JU'''''''';';.b.'''';'''';_'',,,,,,\,;
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 41 of 46
Service Benefit Unit, or managed and financed by an independent district on behalf
of Collier County,
3. Provision of services and facilities by a COO (or other independent special purpose
local government).
Planning considerations used to judge the best alternative for the Heritage Bay community
facilities and services included:
1. Anticipated quality of facilities and services,
2 Responsiveness to community needs for facilities and services.
3. Long term commitment to the community.
4. Ability to appropriately and adequately manage and fund community facil ities and
services.
Relative to Consideration 1, quality of facilities and services, all the options would likely
provide the same quality of facilities because each would be required to meet County
standards, In terms of quality service, however, the COD is considered the best option
because of its local nature and knowledge of the local facilities. Homeowner's associations
would also be local but usually do not have the expertise available to provide the needed
service. County government. while possessing the necessary expertise, has many other
customers and typically does not provide the quality of service attainable by a local, focused
organization such as the COD.
Management of the District's infrastructure by the members of the District Board of
Supervisors provides pinpointed, focused management on a daily basis. The District is
independent of any countervailing pressures whether they be the reelection pressures of
county officials, the pressures from managing many other responsibilities and exercising
many other duties as county officials, or whether they be the pressures of meeting quarterly
and annual profit statements from a developer. From a planning perspective, focused
management enhances the intrinsic value of the property. Additionally, land planning and
permitting shall be consistent with all federal, state and county standards.
Relative to Consideration 2, again the local COD, devoted to this area's facility and service
needs, will be more responsiye than a developer, a homeowner's association. or general
county government. The supervisors of the COD are first elected only by the property
owners, (and later by the qualified electors) of the COD and therefore need be responsive
only to them.
Condition 3, long-term commitment to provide and serve the facility needs of the community,
would also be best met by a COD. Both the homeowner's association option and the COD
would provide a personal concern, interest and commitment to long-term welfare of the
community that is difficult for general county government to provide. The homeowner's
association, however, does not have the COD statutory powers and duties spelled out in
Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, Additionally, the statutory reporting and coordination
requirements of a COD contained in Chapter 189, Florida Statutes, provide additional
assurances that the long-term needs of the community are being met by the COD.
Homeowner's associations generally depend on substantial volunteer and amateur effort
that, while serving a useful purpose, is not able to substitute for the professional, dedicated.
public work of the COD.
lm_l48383 Vor.02I-CCAY
(WIll
ZIIIIlllIlllHII5-. 0
9
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10. 2005
Page 42 of 46
Regarding Consideration 4, the COO has a number of ac:lvantages over a private
organization when it comes to management and related funding or financing facilities and
services. The COO has statutory powers to manage projects, raise funds, and finance
projects. Additionally, it is eligible for state funding programs for which a private entity might
not be eligible. The CDO's local role of planning, managing and funding the community's
facilities also is preferred over general county government management and funding
because of the personal and intimate commitment, concern and knowledge that the COD
will, by nature, possess.
Based on each of these considerations, the COD is, in my opinion, the best alternative for
delivering community services and facilities to the Heritage Bay community.
I, Carron Dav attest that the statements and finding in this report are true and accurate to
the best of my knowledge.
12/7/2004- '_3 Ye" 021- CDAY
ClMlI
ZlIlIIIIIIIIIHIlIi -0
10
,.'..""....""',.,'".;^';,~m~_._"*~i\I>lIIlolllt""'~i."',;.',,'"..
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 43 of 46
ATI' ACHMENT 2
STAFF ANALYSIS RELATIVE
TO THE SIX (6) FACTORS
FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FORMATION
FOR HERITAGE BAY CDD
BacmoUDd:
Section 190.005, Florida Statutes. outlines the specific content required in a Community
Development District (CDD) petition and further outlines six (6) factors for the Board of County
Commissioners to consider in determining whether to grant or deny a petition for the
establishment of a CDD, as follows:
1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true
and correct.
2. Whether the creation of the district is inconsistent with any applicable element or
portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government
comprehensive plan.
3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is
sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one
functional interrelated community.
4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district.
5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the district will be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
6. Whether the area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate
special-district government.
Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the six factors referenced above and makes the
following findings with regard to the proposed Heritage Bay Community Development District:
1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true and
correct.
Comprehensive Planning Department staff, along with the staffs of the County Attorney's Office,
the Utilities Engineering Department and the Transportation Planning Department, has reviewed
the referenced Community Development District petition. Based upon the review of the petition
and sufficiency information, staff believes that the information found within these documents is
substantially true and correct.
1
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 44 of 46
2. Whether the creation of the district is inconsistent with any applicable element or
portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government
comprehensive plan.
The Heritage Bay P.U.D. is also an approved Development of Regional Impact (DRl) originally
approved by the Board of County Commissioners in 1987. As part of the approval process, the
development was found to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan in effect at that time.
The entire P.U.D. designated Urban, Industrial District on the Collier County Future Land Use
Map. The proposed CDD would be a unit of local government established specifically for the
purpose of carrying out the approved Master Development Plan and commitments of the
Heritage Bay Development. The CDD does not authorize any form or amount of development
not previously approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Therefore, staff finds that the
establishment of the CDD is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
As to consistency with the State Comprehensive Plan, the County staff notes that the CDD
process is established within Section 190 of the Florida Statutes. The petitioner has not deviated
from the standard process, as established by the Statute. Section 187.201, Florida Statutes.
contains the text of the State's Comprehensive Plan. Subsection (2)(a) is the State Plan Goal for
Governmental Efficiency, which reads as follows:
" Goal. --Florida governments shall economically and efficiently provide the amount and
quality of services required by the public."
Policy 2 within this goal area reads as follows:
"2. Allow the creation of independent special taxing districts which have uniform
general law standards and procedures and do not overburden other governments and their
taxpayers while preventing the proliferation of independent special taxing districts which do not
meet these standards."
As an "independent special taxing district", the proposed CDD is consistent with the State
Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is
sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one
functional interrelated community.
The proposed Heritage Bay Community Development District, if approved, would be within the
size range of several other CDDs within Collier County. For instance, the Heritage Greens or
Dove Point CDD comprises approximately 251 acres, the Key MarcolHorr's Island CDD is
approximately 174 acres in size, and the Islesworth CDD is approximately 262 acres. Based
upon previous experience and the subsequent success of other Collier County CDDs,
Comprehensive Planning Department staff believes that the Heritage Bay Community
Development District meets the above criteria.
2
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10, 2005
Page 45 of 46
4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district.
As noted within Exhibit 5 of the CDD petition, there are numerous alternatives available for the
provision of infrastructure and services by and for an approved development. These include, but
are not limited to the following: private funding procured by the developer; establishment of a
homeowners association; establishment of a Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU);
establishment of a Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU); establishment of a Community
Improvement District (limited to drainage and irrigation related improvements); establishment of
a County-managed special purpose district; or, direct County management. All of these
alternative options have various legal, financial or other limitations on their operations or do not
provide a focused, compact approach to the provision of infrastructure and services. Therefore,
staff finds that establishment of the proposed COD is the best alternative available for delivering
community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the proposed
district.
S. Whether the community development services and facilities of the district win be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
The proposed CDD cannot develop any facilities and services that are incompatible with the
surrounding area. This is because the COD's sole purpose is to implement conditions and
developer commitments that were part of the original P.U.D. and DR! approvals. The District
Board of Supervisors will not have the legal authority to implement any facilities, services or
development that would be inconsistent with its existing development approvals.
6. Whether the area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate special-
district government.
Based upon staff findings concerning the previous five criteria, Comprehensive Planning
Department staff finds that the subject area for the proposed CDD is amenable to special district
government. Furthermore, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the
Ordinance, as contained in Attachment 1, establishing the Heritage Bay Community
Development District.
3
Agenda Item No. 8A
May 10. 2005
Page 46 of 46
~
z
~
0
u
LEE COUNTY ~I
I PROJECT ~-~
LOOATION
~
NAPJ.a..IMMOKAI..EE ROAD (C.R. 848)
!
IE
g
i
Ii
($ i
VANDERBILT BeACH ROAD
g
I i
t'--
~ ~
GOLDEN GATE BOUlEVARD
.i.,,,";";""',..,.;""..,..,'''''''..."''';"".._.......~,''''',.,,,",,.,''"';..,...'"'',,.,_<"","_,
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 133
---
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Petition: PUDA-2004-AR-6786 Vanderbilt Partners n, LLC, represented by Richard
Y ovanovich, of Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson, P .A., requesting to amend the Cocohatchee Bay
PUD document for the limited purpose of amending the Bald Eagle Management Plan and
related references in the Planned Unit Development (PUD) document. The subject property,
consisting of 532 acres, is located in Sections 8, 16, 17 & 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East,
Collier County, Florida.
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS:
The petition was continued from the April 26, 2005 BCC public hearing date to the May lO, 2005 BCC
public hearing date at the applicants request. The BCC granted the petitioner the request based upon
Commissioner Henning's unexpected absence from the April 26, 2005 BCC public hearing date.
The executive summary prepared for the April 26, 2005 BCC public hearing is attached with the full
agenda packet.
PREPARED BY:
,.-.
Mike Bosi, AICP, Principal Planner
Zoning and Land Development Review
,"-'
PUDZ-A-AR-6142
1
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10. 2005
Page 2 01133
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
38
This Item 10 be heard a110~OO 8,m The petition was continued from the April 26, 2005
BCe hearing at tile applicants request. This item requires that all participants be sworn in
ane ex.parte disclosure: De provided by Commission members Petition: PUDA.2004.AR-
6786 Vanderbilt Partners II, LLC represented by Richard Yovanovich. of Goodielte,
Coleman & JOf\rlson, P.A., requesting to amend 1he Cocohatchee Bay PUD document for
the limi1ed purpose of amending the Bald Eagle Management Plan and related references
in the Pianned Unit Development (PUO) document The subject property, consisting of 532
acres. is located in Sections B 15,17 & 20, Township 48 South. Range 25 Eas1, Collif:r
County, Flonda
5110120059.00.00 AM
Mike 80S!, AICP
Pnncipal Planner
411412D0510:03:12 AM
Prepared By
Community Development &
Environmental S"'rvi(~es
D.ne
Zoning & Land Oevelopment Review
Mike Bosi, AICP
Principal Pla.nner
Date
Approved By
Community Development &
Envirol1me-ntal SeNiceli
ll)niuU & land Dl!'\I(Jlopmunt R~view
4114/20059:26 AM
SU1>"m Mum.y, Ale?
ZOlling '" Lmd Ot!!vt!'loflmtmt Pir~lor
Datl~
Approved By
Community Development &
EnvironlYlental S~rvices
lOlling & Land Development RevIew
4114/2005 3:33 PM
R:"y Bellow.
Chier Platml!:r
O;rtil'l
Approved By
Community Oevl~I(lf.rn.~r'lt &.
Environmental ~rvi(:l!!s
Zoning & Land Oe'\lelopmenl Review
4/18/20058:27 AM
Executive Secretary
Date
Approved By
Sandra Lea
Community Devoelopmtent &
Environmentill5ervices
Community Development &
Environmental ServiC4!:s Admin.
.(./18i2005 1:44 PM
Conllt.an<:f! A. JohnSion
Oatl~
Approved By
ConllTlunrty Development &
Elwironrnental Services
Olwratlans Arullyst
Community Development &
Envirol'1men1al Services Admin.
4/19120054:13 PM
Norm E, Feder, AICP
Transp€lrtation Divlston Admini51rator
Date
Approved By
TranfiporliCll'l Servicl~s
Transportation Sj~tvir..l~s I\drnill,
4126120055:26 PM
Donald L. 5cort
Transportation Planning Director
Date
Approved By
Tran'iOportion Smrvk:eli
lransportalloh Planning
4/27/200$ fi:2D AM
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
EnvironmentalStet'lices
Community D~\lldl)prnEmf."
Envirotlllum1al S~rvices Adl1lil'sf.rntm
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin,
4128/20053:58 PM
OMS Coordinalor
Admirustrati\lle: Assistant
Oatp.
Approved By
County Manager's Offi(:e
Office of Maunnl~ntmt & Budgtlt
(J2I'l12005 4:21 PM
Mark Isackson
Budget Analyst
Date
Approved By
Count.y M.mager's Office
Offici!' of Management & Budget
5/2/2.0056:01 PM
Michael 5my1ww$iki
Managemmtt &. Budqt!t Dir1!ctor
Date
Approved By
county Manager's Ofl"jCI!
Ofiicp. of Mal1agement & Budget
5/3/2005 4 :011 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Soanl of County
Commissionll!'TS
County Manager
D;!Ite
County M.Ulllgtlr'll Offit;tJ
5/3120056:19 PM
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 133
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Petition: PUDA-2004-AR-6786 Vanderbilt Partners IT, LLC, represented by Richard
Yovanovich, of Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson, P.A., requesting to amend the Cocohatchee Bay
PUD document for the limited purpose of amending the Bald Eagle Management Plan and
related references in the Planned Unit Development (PUD) document. The subject property,
consisting of 532 acres, is located in Sections 8, 16,17 & 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East,
Collier County, Florida.
OBJECTIVE:
To have the Board of County Commissioners determine whether the requested PUD amendment is
consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) and Land Development Code
(LDC) and is in the best interest of the community.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The Cocohatchee Bay PUD was originally approved by the Board of County Commissioners on
December 12, 2000 and authorized by PUD Ordinance Number 00-88. On September 21, 2004, the
Board of County Commissioners, at their advertised public hearing, voted to allow the petitioner to
submit an amendment to the existing Cocohatchee Bay PUD for the limited purpose of revising the
Bald Eagle Management Plan and related references.
As noted, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the PUD Ordinance for the
Cocohatchee Bay Development on December 12, 2000. The Ordinance approved the development of
multi-family high-rise and low-rise condominiums up to 20 stories tall, at a density of 1.11 dwelling
units per acre. The project is also approved for a social and fitness center, a golf driving range and
clubhouse, golf course, tennis courts, guest cottages, parking areas, and stormwater management
facilities. The entire PUD comprises approximately 532.09:1= acres. The majority of the golf course
and 90 residential units designated R-2 by the PUD document are located within the portion of the
PUD lying east of Vanderbilt Drive and north of Wiggins Pass Road. The remaining facilities and 480
residential units are to be located on the west side of Vanderbilt Drive and north of the existing
Wiggins Pass Marina.
At the time of approval, and continuing through the time of this writing, an actively used nest of a pair
of bald eagles exists on the site. The bald eagle is listed as "threatened" by the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service. The bald eagle's nest territory is comprised of a Primary Protection Zone, which
extends out a radius of 750 feet from the nest tree, and a Secondary Protection Zone which extends out
from the Primary Zone to 1,500 feet from the nest tree (750 - 1,500).
The approved PUD document is unusual in that it contains two master plans. Exhibit "A" indicates the
proposed development plan including golf course and residential areas. Exhibit ''B'' indicates golf
course only, entirely outside of the Bald Eagle Primary Protection Zone, and no residential areas.
Exhibit "A" is applicable only when the bald eagle nesting tree is deemed no longer active.
PUDA-2004-AR-6786
1
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 133
FISCAL IMPACT:
The rezoning of this PUD by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no
guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development, however, if
the property is rezoned, a portion of the existing land will be developed and the new development will
result in an impact on Collier County public facilities.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of
each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in
the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain adopted
Levels of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of
concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County
is required to pay 50 percent of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project.
Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees and
utility fees associated with connecting to the County's water and sewer system.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
The subject property is located within the Urban Designation, Urban-Mixed-Use District, Urban
Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
The majority of the western portion of the PUD is located seaward of the Coastal High Hazard Area
Boundary.
As noted, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Cocohatchee Bay PUD Ordinance
(Ordinance No. 00-88) on December 12,2000. The size of the PUD is approximately 532 acres. The
PUD Ordinance allows the petitioner to develop 590 units, which represents a residential density for
the PUD of approximately 1.11 units per acre. The proposed amendment does not involve any
proposed change to the number of residential units. It only seeks to allow already approved
development within the eagle nest area. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not impact the
approved density. Collier County Comprehensive Planning finds that the proposed amendment is
consistent with the provisions of the Future Land Use Element.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
As noted, on September 21, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners voted to allow the petitioner to
submit an amendment to the existing Cocohatchee Bay PUD for the limited purpose of amending the
Bald Eagle Management Plan and related references, and based upon that direction, the petitioner is
seeking to amend the PUD's Bald Eagle Management Plan to enable the development of the five (5)
condominium buildings, four (4) of which would be located entirely or partially within the primary
protective zone surrounding an active bald eagle nest. To compensate for unavoidable impacts to the
eagles, the petitioner bas proposed (to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the Florida Fish & Wildlife
Conservation Commission) to purchase and preserve suitable habitat for eagles, either within Collier
County, or an adjacent Southwest Florida County. The petitioner has also proposed the construction of
an artificial nesting platform on another portion of the property in the hope that the eagles might
relocate to the platform. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) has issued a biological opinion to
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers recommending that the Corps permit the development proposed
within the vicinity of the eagle nest.
PUDA-2004-AR-6786
2
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 133
As a "Discretionary Conservation Measure," relative to the Corps of Engineers Permit, the petitioner
has committed to cons1ructing a 50-foot to 60-foot high "artificial tree" containing a nesting platform,
at an onsite location removed from the vicinity of the proposed condominium buildings.
Representatives of the South Florida Water Management District will monitor the
construction/installation of the artificial tree. It is hoped, but not known, that the eagles will relocate
their nest to the artificial tree's nesting platform. However, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service's
Biological Opinion acknowledges that the proposed activities may constitute a biological taking (i.e.,
the eagles would no longer nest on the subject property).
The PUD amendment seeks only to amend the Bald Eagle Management Plan and references
throughout the existing PUD. The form and intensity of the project was evaluated and approved
through Ordinance Number 2000-88. In addressing the protection of endangered, threatened, or listed
species, the Land Development Code states:
fIIllJE Species Specific Requirements
On property where the wildlife survey establishes that listed species are utilizing the site
or where the site is capable of supporting listed species and such listed species can be
anticipated to potentially occupy the site, the County shall, consistent with the GMP,
consider and utilize recommendations and letters of technical assistance from the Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and recommendations from the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service in issuing development orders. It is recognized that these agency
recommendations, on a case-by-case basis, may change the requirements contained
herein and any such change shall be deemed to be consistent with this Code. The
following specific species management and protection plans shall be applicable, in
addition to those required by other provision in this section 3.04.00
Based upon the manner in which the LDC addresses specific species requirements, provisions within
the existing PUD document, which contemplates amendments to the Bald Eagle Management Plan and
the applicant having received a United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) biological opinion,
as issued to the U.S. Army COIpS of Engineers that would allow development in the Primary Protection
Zone during the non-nesting season, the proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of
the LDC and the GMP.
It should be noted that the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, in addition to a number of residents at
the two Neighborhood Information Meetings and the Environmental Advisory Council (RAC) hearing,
raised the point of statements made by the applicant during the original Board of County
Commissioners (BCe) public hearing for the project. These statements indicated that the project
would not go forward until the eagle pair had relocated. It is the Conservancy's opinion, as expressed
in a letter dated January 31, 2005, that the original commitments verbally made during the BCC public
hearing should be adhered to and therefore, had asked the Planning Commission to forward a
recommendation of denial to the BCC. It should be noted that the PUD document does not contain a
specific regulation that states development cannot occur until the eagles leave the site. The existing
PUD does contain a Bald Eagle Management Plan that prevents development from moving forward as
long as the pair of eagles remain on site, but the document, as noted, does contain a provision for
PUDA-2004-AR-6786
3
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 133
amending the Bald Eagle Management Plan. The letter of objection from the Conservancy and the
minutes of the December 12, 2000 BCC hearing are contained within this agenda packet
PUBLIC INPUT
Contained within this executive summary agenda packet are letters submitted to staff in opposition of
the proposed amendment from the general public, as well as representatives of various interest groups,
such as the Conservancy of Southwest Florida. The majority of the letters of opposition focus upon
verbal commitments made at the time of the original PUD approval by the owner's agent that
development would not move forward until the eagle pair is no longer on-site.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
The petition appeared before the EAC on February 3, 2005. The EAC forwarded the petition to the
Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of denial, based upon the EAC members
belief that the original PUD approval would have never been granted if construction was going to be
allowed to move forward with the eagle's still present on the property. The motion of denial passed by
a vote of5 to 2.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
The Collier County Planning Commission heard this petition on March 17, 2005. The CCPC
forwarded the petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of denial based
upon the proposed amendment not satisfying criteria number eighteen, as contained within Section
10.03.05.0 of the Land Development Code, "Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board
of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety and
welfare." The CCPC within their motion indicated that the proposed amendment was not in
conformity with components of the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan.
Specifically the CCPC indicated that the proposal failed to satisfy LDC Section 1O.03.05.E.2, which
states, "As a result of mandated meetings with the public, any commitments made by the applicant
shall be reduced to writing and made a part of the record of the proceedings provided to the planning
services department. These written commitments will be made a part of the staffreport to the county's
appropriate review and approval bodies and made a part of the consideration for inclusion in the
conditions of approval of any applicable development order." Additionally, the CCPC indicated that
the proposed amendment did not satisfy LDC Section 10.03.05.J, which concludes by stating, "In
cases where stipulations, restrictions or saftguards are attached, all representations of the owner or
his agents at public hearings shall be deemed contractual and may be enforced by suit for injunction
or other appropriate relief. All conditions, restrictions, stipulations and safeguards which are a
condition to the granting of the change in zoning district shall be deemed contractual and may be
enforced by suit for injunction or other appropriate relief All costs, including reasonable attorney's
fees shall be awarded to the governmental unit if it prevails in such suit." Additionally the CCPC
indicated that the proposed amendment did not satisfy Objective 7.1 of the Growth Management Plan
and Section 3.04.01.C3A, both of which directs incompatible land uses away from listed animal
PUDA-2004-AR-6786
4
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 133
species and their habitats. The CCPC within their motion also indicated that the proposed amendment
was in conflict with Section 3.04.02.D which addresses restrictions within protection zones for bald
eagles. The motion of denial passed by a vote of 7 to 1.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a
determination by the Board of County Commissioners (BCe) must be based. The legal considerations
are reflected in the Collier County Planning Commission's evaluation of the listed criteria in Chapter
10.03.05 and Chapter 10.02.12 of the LOC. These evaluations are completed as separate documents
that have been incorporated into the attached staff report. A summary of the legal considerations and
findings are noted below:
· The proposed change has been deemed consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
Future Land Use Map and the applicable elements of the GMP.
· The proposed land uses are compatible with the existing land use pattern.
· The proposed change will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types
of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses because of peak volumes or
projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public safety. This project has also been deemed consistent
with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Traffic Element of the GMP.
· The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, both public and private, shall be provided.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Petition PUDA-2004-AR-6786
subject to the amended Cocohatchee Bay PUD document and exhibits with the following
modifications to the Bald Eagle Management Plan (BEMP):
1. Revise the first sentence of the Bald Eagle Management Plan to correctly reference the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
2. Revise Section A of the BEMP to eliminate the second sentence of the paragraph that
states, "The applicant also proposes to construct a 35-s1ip marina." The existing PUD
makes no provisions for a marina use as a permitted or accessory use and due to this fact
the reference to a marina project should not be included within the BEMP.
3. Revise Section E of the BEMP to read as follows: "Should the current eagle pair or a
second eagle pair build a new nest within the PUD boundary, any reyisions to the ab(;)';e
deseribea terms and coad.itioRs relttlired by the ageHeies listea above shall Rat re~uir-e an
amendment to this Bald Eagle Management Plan shall be required." This change would
allow for public comment through the public hearing process if above referenced events
transpire. As the section currently reads, amendments to the BEMP would only require
administrative review.
PREPARED BY:
, Mike Bos~ AICP, Principal Planner
Zoning and Land Development Review
PtnDA-2004-~-6786
5
'Ii ',' ,(j,
I
I
L-
AG~R~~~%~~
Page 8 of 133
eoJ!';! ~nty
- '...... -
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEARING DATE: MARCH 17,2005
SUBJECT: PETITION PUDA-2004-AR-6786, Cocohatchee Bay
AGENT! APPLICANT:
OWNER:
Vanderbilt Partners n, LLC
5551 Ridgewood Dr., Suite 203
Naples, FL 34108
AGENT:
Richard Y ovanovich, Esquire
Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson, PA
4001 Tamiami Trail North #300
Naples, FL 34103
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner is requesting to amend the Cocohatchee Bay pun document for the limited
purpose of revising the attached Bald Eagle Management Plan and related references in the
PUD document.
GEOGRAPffiC LOCATION:
The eastern portion of the development is located at the northeast corner of Vanderbilt Drive and
Wiggins Pass Road. The larger, western portion of the PUD is entirely on the west side of
Vanderbilt Drive, extending from the northern boundary of The Dunes PUD to the southern
boundary of the Arbor Trace PUD. The Audubon Country Club PUD bounds a northwest
extension of the Cocohatchee Bay PUD on the west. The subject property, consisting of 532
acres, is located in Sections 8, 16, 17 & 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier
County, Florida. (See illustration on following page)
PUDA-04-AR-6786. Cocohatchee Bay PUD
a:li.{)l'?
COOl'?
0..-
ON_
Z - 0
o
E"-O'l
(1) >, (l)
:!:::m~
m~o..
-a
c
(1)
OJ
<(
...- /
-
.. I'
I
---..,
a..
<
::E
z
.1. b
-
....
<
o
o
-'
"II
PUDA-04-AR-6786, Cocohatchee Bay PUD 2
0-
<
~
W
I-
-
en
.
,
C
Q
:;)
A.
.
z
o
j:
i=
IU
L
,}
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 133
PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The Cocohatchee Bay PUD was originally approved by Collier County on December 12,
2000, and authorized by PUD Ordinance Number 00-88. On September 21,2004, the Board
of County Commissioners at their advertised public hearing voted to allow the petitioner to
submit an amendment to the existing Cocohatchee Bay PUD for the limited purpose of
revising the Bald Eagle Management Plan and related references.
As noted, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the PUD Ordinance
for the Cocohatchee Bay Development on December 12,2000. The Ordinance approved the
development of multi-family high-rise and low-rise condominiums up to 20 stories tall, at a
density of 1.11 dwelling units per acre. The project is also approved for a social and fitness
center, a golf driving range and clubhouse, golf course, tennis courts, guest cottages, parking
areas, and stormwater management facilities. The entire PUD comprises approximately
532.09:!:. acres. The majority of the golf course and 90 residential units designated R-2 by the
PUD document are located within the portion of the PUD lying east of Vanderbilt Drive and
north of Wiggins Pass Road. The remaining facilities and 480 residential units are to be
located on the west side of Vanderbilt Drive and north of the existing Wiggins Pass Marina.
At the time of approval, and continuing through the time of this writing, an actively used nest
of a pair of bald eagles exists on the site. The bald eagle is listed as "threa~ened" by the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. A Primary Protection Zone extends out a radius of
750 feet from the nest tree and a Secondary Protection Zone extends out a radius of 1,500 feet
from the nest tree.
The approved PUD document is unusual in that it contains two master plans. Exhibit "A"
indicates the proposed development plan including golf course and residential areas. Exhibit
"B" indicates golf course only, entirely outside of the Bald Eagle Primary Protection Zone,
and no residential areas. Exhibit "A" is applicable only when the bald eagle nesting tree is
deemed no longer active.
The applicant has received a United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) biological
opinion. as issued to the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers that would allow development in the
Primary Protection Zone during the non-nesting season, and which could continue through
the nesting season. Therefore, the developer wishes to amend the Bald Eagle Management
Plan, which is an exhibit to the POO, to allow development in the Primary Protection Zone to
start during the non-nesting season and continue through the nesting season.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
Subject Parcel:
Limitedly cleared parcel, zoned Cocohatchee Bay PUD
Surrounding-
North: Undeveloped and developed residential parcels, zoned Arbor
Trace POO, Residential (RSF-3/ST) and Village Place POO
PUDA-04-AR-6786, Cocohatchee Bay PUD 3
Agenda Item No.}B
May 10, 2u05
Page 11 of 133
J..-3JST
East: Undeveloped and developed residential parcels, undeveloped
commercial parcel, Cocohatchee River Park, and existing
zoned Tarpon Cove PUD, Commercial (C-4), Public Use (P)
South: Existing Marina. residential dwelling units zoned Commercial
(C-4), Tarpon Cove PUD, Wiggins Bay PUD and the Dunes.
PUD
West: Undeveloped parcels and Gulf of Mexico zoned Conservation
with a Special Treatment Overlay and Agricultural with
S ecial Treatment Overlay (CON-ST -A-ST)
1H~~T I I~
It' ,;
GLENEOENON.T~'8A'Y . 1!oCm
ARBOR TRACE)1iJj
~~
COCOHATCHfiE aqy POD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY:
The subject property is located within the Urban Designation, Urban-Mixed-Use District,
Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (PLUM) of the Growth
Management Plan (GMP). The majority of the western portion of the PUD is located
seaward of the Coastal High Hazard Area Boundary.
PUDA-04-AR-6786, Cocohatchee Bay PUD 4
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 133
Future Land Use Element: As noted~ the Board of County Commissioners adopted the
Cocohatchee Bay PUD Ordinance (Ordinance No. 00-88) on December l2~ 2000. The size
of the PUD is approximately 532 acres. The PUD Ordinance allows the petitioner to develop
590 units~ which represents a residential density for the PUD of approximately 1.11 units per
acre. The proposed amendment does not involve any proposed change to the number of
residential units. It only seeks to allow already approved development within the eagle nest
area. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not impact the approved density. Collier
County Comprehensive Planning finds that the propoHd amendment is consistent with the
provisions of the Future Land Use Element. However~ staff must defer to County
Environmental Services Department staff, as to whether the proposed revisions to the Bald
Eagle Management Plan are consistent with County provisions regarding the protection of
listed species.
Transportation Element: Due to the limited nature of the PUD amendment request, the
positive consistency review established for the Cocohatchee Bay PUD in 2000 will remain in
effect.
Open Space/Conservation: The proposed PUD amendment will not affect the 308 acres of
open space provided for by the PUD.
ANALYSIS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on
which a favorable determination must be based. These criteria are specifically noted in
Chapter 10.02.13 and Chapter 10.03.05 of the Land Development Code and required staff
evaluation and comment. The Planning Commission to the BCC also used these criteria as
the basis for their recommendation. Appropriate evaluation of petitions for amendments to
PUDs should establish a factual basis for supportive action by appointed and elected
decision-makers. Each of the potential impacts or considerations identified during the staff
review are listed under each of the criterion noted and are summarized by staff: culminating
in a determination of compliance, non-compliance, or compliance with mitigation. These
evaluations are completed as separate documents and are traditionally attached to the staff
report as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B". Due to the limited nature of the requested PUD
amendrnent~ modification to the attached Bald Eagle Management Plan, the original rezone
findings are not effected by the request and therefore are not attached to the staff report.
Exhibit "A" Findings for PUD has been attached for the Planning Commission to utilize as
the basis for their recommendation to the BCC.
Environmental Analvsis: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and notes
the following: The petitioner is proposing to amend the PUD as it relates to the Bald Eagle
Management Plan (BEMP) only~ which the Board of County Commissioners voted and
approved was appropriate at their meeting on September 19,2004.
The following excerpt is from the consultant's report from the original PUD rezone:
PUDA-04-AR-6786, Cocohatchee Bay PUD 5
Agenda Item No. !3B
May 10, 2005
Page 13 of 133
"An active bald eagle nest is located on the site on the west side of Vanderbilt Drive, shown
on the attached site plan / preserve map. The parent birds fledged one hatchling in 1998-99
and two young during the 1999-00 season. The young were successfully reared and both left
the nest in April of 2000. The nest is located in a dead and rapidly deteriorating Slash Pine
tree on the western portion of the property. The tree is located between a small sawgrass
marsh area and the bay forest / mangrove swamp. The birds have an open view to the water
over the tops of the mangroves to the west. All of the established trees between the nest tree
and Vanderbilt Drive have died, most likely due to a fIre that occurred on the property several
years ago so the birds also have a relatively unobstructed view of pedestrian and vehicular
traffic along Vanderbilt Drive. SpecifIc observations were made during the past two nesting
seasons [98-99 and 99-00J to note flight patterns and feeding behavior around the nest. These
observations showed that flights into and out of the nest were consistently to the south and
southwest from the nest tree regardless of the time of day or weather conditions. Several
other dead pines around the nest served as perches for the parents during the nesting season."
The petitioner has received a U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's (USACE) permit that contains a
Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Statement by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) in accordance with Section 7 of the Federal Endangered Species Act, which has been
coordinated with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). The
applicant proposes to amend the BEMP in accordance with the Incidental Take Statement.
The original BEMP is stricken in its entirety. The original BEMP contains information about
the history of this eagles' nest, fledgling success and flight patterns of the birds. There is a
section describing Biology and Habitat Requirements of the Bald Eagle and the history of
why the birds were added to the Endangered Species list. Finally, the approved BEMP
describes how development will proceed and how the eagles will be protected, including an
education plan.
The amended BEMP is composed of sections of the Incidental Take Statement from FWS to
USACE written in two letters dated February 27,2004 and July 14, 2004.
Section A. Project Description of the amended BEMP mentions a 35-s1ip marina to be
developed in the PUD. The marina has not been reviewed or approved by County Staff.
The amended BEMP includes the two Reasonable and Prudent Measures for reducing the
likelihood of take and the five Terms and Conditions for construction of the project listed in
the Incidental Take Statement. The construction would be phased to begin with development
in the secondary zone in the non-nesting season and would be allowed to continue during the
next and subsequent nesting seasons. Construction for the high-rises in the primary zone
would likely begin in consecutive non-nesting seasons, but be allowed to continue during
nesting seasons.
The Bald Eagle Management Phasing Diagram (Sheet 1 of 1) is conceptual and building site
and infrastructure may be required to be modified during Site Development Plan review.
PUDA-04-AR-6786, Cocohatchee Bay PUD 6
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 133
There are a large number of gopher tortoises in the primary zone of the eagle nest that were
not addressed at the time the golf course was permitted. The golf course Site Development
Plan (SDP) is in for an amendment, so these gopher tortoises will be addressed with this SDP
and the SDP for Phases II-N of the development.
This petition appeared before the Environmental Action Council at the February 2, 2005
hearing. The EAC forwarded the petition to the BCC with a recommendation of denial. The
motion of denial passed 5 to 2.
Transportation Analysis: Transportation Department Staff did not review the petition based
upon the limited nature of the POO amendment request.
Utility Issues: The Utilities Department Staff did not review the petition based upon the
limited nature of the POO amendment request.
Zoning and Land Development Review Analvsis: As noted, on September 21, 2004, the
Board of County Commissioners voted to allow the petitioner to submit an amendment to the
existing Cocohatchee Bay PUD for the limited purpose of amending the Bald Eagle
Management Plan and related references.
The petitioner is seeking to amend the POO's Bald Eagle Management Plan to enable the
development of the five (5) condominium buildings, four (4) of which would be located
entirely or partially within the primary protective zone surrounding an active bald eagle nest.
To compensate for unavoidable impacts to the eagles, the petitioner has proposed (to the U.S.
Fish & Wildlife Service and the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission) to
purchase and preserve suitable habitat for eagles, either within Collier County, or an adjacent
Southwest Florida County. The petitioner has also proposed the construction of an artificial
nesting platform on another portion of the property, in the hope that the eagles might relocate
to the platform. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) has issued a biological opinion
to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers recommending that the Corps permit the development
proposed within the vicinity of the eagle nest.
As a "Discretionary Conservation Measure," relative to the Corps of Engineers Permit, the
petitioner has committed to constructing a 50-foot to 60-foot high "artificial tree" containing
a nesting platform, at an onsite location removed from the vicinity of the proposed
condominium buildings. Representatives of the South Florida Water Management District
will monitor the construction/installation of the artificial tree. It is hoped, but not known,
that the eagles will relocate. their nest to the artificial tree's nesting platform. However, the
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service's Biological Opinion acknowledges that the proposed activities
may constitute a biological taking (i.e., the eagles would no longer nest on the subject
property).
The PUD amendment seeks only to amend the Bald Eagle Management Plan and references
throughout the existing POO. The form and intensity of the project was evaluated and
PUDA-04-AR-6786, Cocohatchee Bay PUD 7
Agenda Item No.,8B
May 10, 2Q05
Page 15 of 133
approved through Ordinance Number 2000-88. In addressing the protection of endangered,
threatened, or listed species, the Land Development Code states:
IIIlI1I Species Specific Requirements
On property where the wildlife survey establishes that listed species are
utilizing the site or where the site is capable of supporting listed species and
such listed species can be anticipated to potentially occupy the site, the County
shall, consistent with the GMP, consider and utilize recommendations and
letters of technical assistance from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Conunission and recommendations from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in
issuing development orders. It is recognized that these agency
reconunendations, on a case-by-case basis, may change the requirements
contained herein and any such change shall be deemed to be consistent with
this Code. The following specific species management and protection plans
shall be applicable, in addition to those required by other provision in this
section 3.04.00
Based upon the manner in which the LDC address specific species requirements, and the
applicant having received a United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) biological
opinion, as issued to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that would allow development in the
Primary Protection Zone during the non-nesting season, the proposed amendment is
consistent with the requirements of the LDC and the GMP.
It should be noted that the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, in addition to a number of
residents at the two Neighborhood Information Meetings and the EAC hearing raised the
point of statements made by the applicant during the original Board of County
Commissioners (BCe) public hearing for the project. These statements indicated that the
project would not go forward until the eagle .pair had relocated. It is the Conservancy's
opinion, as expressed in a letter dated January 31, 2005, that the original commitments
verbally made during the BCC public hearing should be adhered to, and therefore, are asking
the Planning Conunission to forward a recommendation of denial to the BCC. It should be
noted that the PUD document does not contain a specific regulation that states development
cannot occur until the eagles leave the site. The existing pun does contain a Bald Eagle
Management Plan that prevents development from moving forward as long as the pair of
eagles remain on site, but the document, as noted, does contain a provision for amending the
Bald Eagle Management Plan. The letter of objection from the Conservancy and the minutes
of the December 12, 2000 BCC hearing have been attached to this staff report.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING:
The applicant held the required meeting on December 15, 2004 at 5:30 P.M. at St. John the
Evangelist Parish Life Center. Approximately 75 members of the public heard the proposal
presented by Richard Yovanovich, legal representative for Vanderbilt Partners II, LLC.
Additionally, a second neighborhood meeting was held on January 26, 2005 at the same
locations as the previous meeting. This second meeting was held due to a discrepancy within
PUDA-04-AR-6786, Cocohatchee Bay PUD 8
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 133
the mailing list provided by the County to the applicant. A number of property owners within
500 feet of the project were not properly notified of the first meeting and to rectify this
situation, the applicant agreed to hold the second neighborhood meeting.
Mr. Y ovanovich and representatives responded to questions and comments with the
following statements:
1.) The applicant has requested 590 units that were approved by the BCC in 2000
2.) 439 acres of the total site are in "preserve" status
3.) The Army Core of Engineers is allowing an "incidental take" permit regarding the
nesting eagle(s) on site, which states that construction activity cannot touch the tree
the bird is nesting in or the bird itself.
4.) First phase of the most northern tower which is 15 stories high is to begin in the "non-
nesting" season
5.) The non-nesting season begins May 15 and runs through October I
6.) The distance separation between the tower to be constructed and the nesting tree is
35-40 feet
7.) The developer committed to constructing an alternate, man-made "tree" for the
nesting eagle
8.) The developer's agent commits to stating a time-frame for the placement of ~e
alternative "tree" at the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) meeting hearing
9.) Projected EAC hearing is Spring 2005
Of those who spoke, most opposed construction so near the current nesting eagle site.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPe) forward a recommendation of
approval of Petition PUDA-2004-AR-6786 to amend Ordinance Number 00-88 as described
by the Ordinance of Adoption and exhibits thereto, the Cocohatchee Bay PUD regulatory
document.
PUDA-04-AR-6786, Cocohatchee Bay PUD 9
Agenda Item No. J88
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 133
PREPARED BY:
~~
MIKE BOSI, AICP, PRlNCIPALPLANNER
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
2 -.2.3- OS
DATE
a:x~ 7--7-4-06
RA~L<iO'WS, MANAGER DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
..JAJ..AV7~ 'J-J-O.s-
~MURRAY,AICP,DIRECTOR DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
rO~vi.,-
~
Tentatively scheduled for the Apri112, 2005 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
RUSSELL A. BUDD, CHAIRMAN
PUDA-04-AR-6786, Cocohatchee Bay PUD 10
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 133
FlNDINGS FOR pun
PETITION PUDZ-A-2004-AR-6786
Section 2.7.3.2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Planning
Commission to make a finding as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the
following criteria:
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development
proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding
areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
Jurisdictional reviews by County staff support the manner and pattern of
development proposed for the subject property. Development conditions
contained in the Cocohatchee Bay PUD document give assurance that all
infrastructures will be developed consistent with County regulations. Any
inadequacies that require supplementing the PUD document will be
recommended to the Planning Commission and the BCC as conditions of
approval by staff. Recommended mitigation measures will assure compliance
with Level of Service relationships as prescribed by the GMP. It should be
noted that the request is limited to amending the existing Bald Eagle
Management Plan contained within the existing approved PUD.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed
agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those
proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions
to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas
and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense_
Documents submitted with the application provide evidence of unified
control. The PUD document makes appropriate provisions for continuing
operation and maintenance of common areas.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals,
objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan.
The subject petition has been found consistent with the goals, objectives and
policies of the GMP which mandate the County to utilize recommendations
and letters of technical assistance from the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission and recommendations from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service in issuing development orders.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which
conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements,
restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements.
EXHIBIT "A"
Agenda Item No.,8B
May 10,2005
Page 19 of 133
As noted, the applicant is seeking to amend the PUD document by amending
the existing Bald Eagle Management Plan. lbis change will not alter the
original finding of consistency for the project
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to
serve the development.
As provided in Section 2.10 of the PUD Document, the amount of open space
set aside by this' project is consistent with the provisions of the Land
Development Code.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the
adequacy of available improvements and faciUties, both public and
private.
Given the fact that the Cocohatchee Bay PUD is a currently approved PUD,
the timing or sequence of development in light of concurrency requirements is
not a significant problem.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to
accommodate expansion.
Ability to expand, as applied in this context, implies supporting
infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal system, potable water supplies,
characteristics of the property relative to hazards, and capacity of roads
which is available to this site. As noted, the amendment requests only to
amend the existing Eagle Management Plan. This action shall have no
bearing upon the surrounding area's ability to accommodate expansion.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of
such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such
modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at
least eqnivalent to literal application of such regulations.
Section 6.9.F of the existing Cocohatchee Bay PUD document states, "Any
amendment to the Bald Eagle Management Plan shall require review of the
Environmental Advisory Council or any successor body." This provision of
the existing PUD document indicates that the original document
contemplated and made provisions for amendments to the Bald Eagle
Management Plan. The applicant is requesting to amend the Bald Eagle
Management Plan as provided for by the existing PUD and therefore the
requested action is in conformity with PUD regulations
EXHIBIT "A"
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 133
REZONE FINDINGS
PETmON PUDA-2004-AR-6786
Section 2.7.2.5. of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report and
recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners shall
show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation
to the following, where applicable:
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and
policies and Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management
Plan.
The petitioner has received an incidental take permit, issued from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, that allows for development to take place within the primary zone of the
on-site eagle pair. Based upon the incidental take permit, the applicant wishes to modify
the current Bald Eagle Management Plan (BEMP) to mirror the construction schedule
allowed for within the incidental take permit. The GMP and the LDC differs authority
over protected species to state and federal agencies on a case by case basis and therefore
the proposed change is consistent with the specific policy ofthe GMP
2. The existing land use pattern;
The parcel is a proposed residential PUD. The parcel is surrounded by residential uses
and a County park. Therefore, the proposed residential land use is consistent with the
land use pattern in the area.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts;
The proposed PUD borders land that is zoned for residential use as well as a County park.
Therefore, the subject site will not create an isolated district.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
The proposed district boundaries are logically drawn since they are consistent with the
Growth Management Plan.
EXHIBIT "B"
1
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 133
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
amendment necessary.
The petitioner believes that the incidental take permit issues from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service that allows for development to take place within the primary zone of the
on-site eagle makes the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. This view is
predicated on the manner in which the GMP and the LDC differs authority over protected
species to state and federal agencies.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood;
The proposed change to the Bald eagle Management Plan will have no effect upon living
conditions in the neighborhood
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion
or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because
of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during
construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The proposed change to the Bald eagle Management Plan will have no effect upon the
traffic generated by the approved project Therefore, the proposed PUD will not
excessively increase traffic congestion.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem;
The project will be required to obtain a permit from the South Florida Water
Management District. Drainage problems should not be created when construction is
done in accordance with the permit.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent aress;
The proposed residential uses will be required to meet building setbacks and height
restrictions. When meeting these requirements, light and air will not be seriously
reduced.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent
area;
EXHIBIT "B"
2
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 22 of 133
This site is adjacent to other residential uses and a County park. An appraisal of
estimated future property values resulting from a rezone was not required to be
submitted.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or
development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations;
The development of adjacent properties, in accordance with existing regulations, will not
be affected.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare;
The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege. The change is based
upon technical assistance provided to the County from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in
accordance with existing zoning;
The property today is approved for residential development. The proposed change will
not deviate from the development intensity currently allowed for by the Cocohatchee Bay
PUD document.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or
the County;
The request is consistent with the Density Rating System of the Growth Management
Plan, and is therefore, within the needs of the community.
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed
use in districts already permitting such use.
There are a limited number of coastal parcels eligible for the Conversion Of Commercial
provision.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which
would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses
under the proposed zoning classification.
EXHIBIT "B"
3
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 23 of 133
While site conditions may restrict the location and square-footage of the residential
building, they would not render the property unusable.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and
services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended.
The rezoning of this property will eventually result in the creation of a residential
community. Infrastructure is currently available to the site. If additional infrastructure is
required (e.g. life-safety and schools) it would most likely be constructed outside the
Coastal High Hazard Area. The Site Development Plan or Plat will be reviewed for
compliance with the Levels of Service required for public facilities in the area.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners
shall deem important in the protection ofthe public health, safety, and welfare.
Staff reserves these criteria as the purview of the Collier County Planning Commission
and the Board of County Commissioners to arrive upon.
EXHIBIT "B"
4
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 24 of 133
Item V.D.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
ST AFF REPORT
MEETING OF FEBRUARY 2. 2005
I. NAME OF PETmONERlPROJECT:
Petition No.:
Petition Name:
ApplicantJDeveloper:
Engineering Consultant:
Environmental Consultant:
PUDA-2004-AR-6786
Cocohatchee Bay
Vanderbilt Partners II, LLC
Vanasse Daylor
Turrell and Associates
ll. LOCATION:
The eastern portion of the development is located at the northeast comer of
Vanderbilt Drive and Wiggins Pass Road. The larger, western portion of the PUD
is entirely on the west side of Vanderbilt Drive, extending from the northern
boundary of The Dunes PUD to the southern boundary of the Arbor Trace PUD.
The Audubon Country Club PUD binds a northwest extension of the Cocohatchee
Bay PUD on the west. The subject property, consisting of 532 acres, is located in
Sections 8, 16, 17 & 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,
Florida.
ID. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES:
The project is bordered on the west by the Delnor Wiggins State Park and
Barefoot Beach County Park; on the east by Tarpon cove PUD and Wiggins Bay
PUD, on the south by the Dunes and on the north by Arbor Trace PUD and
Village Place PUD. The general area is a mix of residential developments, public
parks, and limited commercial and environmentally sensitive lands.
North: Undeveloped and developed residential parcels, zoned Arbor
Trace POO, Residential (RSF -3/Sn and Village Place POO
East: Undeveloped and developed residential parcels, undeveloped
commercial parcel, Cocohatchee River Park, and existing zoned
Tarpon Cove PUD, Commercial (C-4), Public (P)
South: Existing Marina, residential dwelling units zoned Commercial (C-
4), Tarpon Cove POO, Wiggins Bay POO and the Dunes POO
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 25 of 133
Page 2 of9
West: Undeveloped parcels and Gulf of Mexico zoned Conservation
with a Special Treatment Overlay and Agricultural with
Special Treatment Overlay
IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The Cocohatchee Bay PUD was originally approved by Collier County on
December 12, 2000, and authorized by PUD Ordinance Number 00-88. On
September 21, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners at their advertised
public hearing voted to allow the petitioner to submit an amendment to the
existing Cocohatchee Bay PUD for the limited purpose of proposing an
amendment to the Bald Eagle Management Plan and related references.
The Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the PUD Ordinance
for the Cocohatchee Bay Development on December 12, 2000. The Ordinance
approved the development of high-rise condominiums up to 20 stories taIl, multi-
family dwellings, and adult living facilities. The project is also approved for a
social and fitness center, a golf driving range and clubhouse, golf course, tennis
courts, guest cottages, parking areas, and stormwater management facilities. The
entire PUD comprises approximately 532.09j: acres. The majority of the golf
course and ninety residential units designated R-2 by the PUD document are
located within the portion of the PUD lying east of Vanderbilt Drive and north of
Wiggins Pass Road. The remaining facilities and 480 residential units are to be
located on the west side of Vanderbilt Drive and north of the existing Wiggins
Pass Marina.
At the time of approval, and continuing through the time of this writing, an
actively used nest of a pair of bald eagles exists on the site. The bald eagle is
listed as "threatened" by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and
the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). A Primary
Protection Zone extends out a radius of 750 feet from the nest tree and a
Secondary Protection Zone extends out a radius of 1,500 feet from the nest tree.
The approved PUD document is unusual in that it contains two master plans.
Exhibit "A" indicates the proposed development plan including golf course and
residential areas. Exhibit "B" indicates golf course only, entirely outside of the
Bald Eagle Primary Protection Zone, and no residential areas. Exhibit "A" is
applicable only when the bald eagle nest tree is deemed no longer active.
The applicant has received a United States Fish and Wildlife Service biological
opinion, as issued to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers that would allow
development in the Primary Protection Zone during the non-nesting season.
Therefore, the developer wishes to amend the Bald Eagle Management Plan,
which is a part of the PUD, to allow development in the Primary Protection Zone
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 26 of 133
Page 3 of9
to start during the non-nesting season and continue through the nesting season,
and in doing so eliminate the master plan defined as "Exhibit B".
V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element:
The subject property is located within the Urban Designation, Urban-Mixed-Use
District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (pLUM) of
the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The majority of the western portion of the
PUD is located seaward of the Coastal High Hazard Area Boundary.
Future Land Use Element: As noted, the Board of County Commissioners
adopted the Cocohatchee Bay PUD Ordinance (Ordinance No. 00-88) on
December 12, 2000. The size of the PUD is approximately 532 acres. The PUD
Ordinance allows the petitioner to develop 590 units, which represents a
residential density for the PUD of approximately 1.11 units per acre. The
proposed amendment does not involve any proposed change to the number of
residential units. It only seeks to allow already approved development within the
eagle nest area. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not impact the
approved density. Collier County Comprehensive Planning finds that the
proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of the Future Land Use
Element. However, staff must defer to County Environmental Services
Department staff, as to whether the proposed revisions to the bald eagle
management plan are consistent with County provisions regarding the protection
oflisted species.
Conservation & Coastal Manaeement Element:
Only those Policies relating to the eagle as a listed species were evaluated for
project consistency.
Policy 7.1.2(3) states: "The County shall, consistent with applicable GMP
policies, consider and utilize recommendations and letters of technical assistance
from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and
recommendations from the US Fish and Wildlife Service in issuing development
orders on property containing listed species. It is recognized that these agency
recommendations, on a case by case basis, may change the requirements
contained within these wildlife protection policies and any such change shall be
deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan." The project is consistent
in that the applicant is proposing to operate under the Terms and Conditions of
the Biological Opinion! Incidental Take for the Bald Eagle on-site, as issued by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 27 of 133
Page 4of9
The project is consistent with Policy 7.1.2(2)(a)3 for the Bald Eagle since the
Biological Opinion! Incidental Take authorizes the development of the habitat
surrounding the nest tree.
VI. MAJOR ISSUES:
Listed Species:
The petitioner is proposing to amend the PUD as it relates to the Bald Eagle
Management Plan (BEMP) only, which the Board of County Commissioners
voted and approved was appropriate at their meeting on September 21,2004.
The following are excerpts from the consultant's report from the original PUD
rezone.
"An active bald eagle nest is located on the site on the west side of Vanderbilt
Drive, shown on the attached site plan / preserve map. The parent birds fledged
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 28 of 133
Page 5 of9
one hatchling in 1998-99 and two young during the 1999-00 season. The young
were successfully reared and both left the nest in April of 2000. The nest is
located in a dead and rapidly deteriorating Slash Pine tree on the western portion
of the property. The tree is located between a small sawgrass marsh area and the
bay forest / mangrove swamp. The birds have an open view to the water over the
tops of the mangroves to the west. All of the established trees between the nest
tree and Vanderbilt Drive have died, most likely due to a fire that occurred on the
property several years ago so the birds also have a relatively unobstructed view of
pedestrian and vehicular traffic along Vanderbilt Drive. Specific observations
were made during the past two nesting seasons [98-99 and 99-00] to note flight
patterns and feeding behavior around the nest. These observations showed that
flights into and out of the nest were consistently to the south and southwest from
the nest tree regardless of the time of day or weather conditions. Several other
dead pines around the nest served as perches for the parents during the nesting
season. "
Since then, the eagles have continued to successfully rear several chicks. FWS
reports in its Biological Opinion of February 27, 2004 that"... the nest has been
documented to produce 13 fledglings, including two per year out of the last four
nesting seasons." During the 2001-2002 season, the eagles reconstructed the nest
in the same tree due to Tropical Storm Gabrielle blowing the nest out of the tree.
The parent eagles have returned to the nest again for the 2004-2005 season and
appear to be brooding an egg(s).
The petitioner has received a U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's (USACE) permit
that contains a Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Statement by the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service in accordance with Section 7 of the Federal Endangered
Species Act. The applicant proposes to amend the BEMP in accordance with the
Incidental Take Statement.
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission coordinated with the
FWS on the Incidental Take Statement and approved of the following statement
being added to the Corps permit: "The permittee shall comply with the
Reasonable and Prudent Measures along with the Mandatory Terms and
Conditions issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for bald eagle nest CQ-19
in their Biological Opinion dated February 27, 2004. In addition, the permittee
will follow minimization measures 1 - 5 described in the 'Description of the
proposed action' of the Biological Opinion. The permittee shall secure the
proposed off-site bald eagle territory prior to initiation of any activity that will
cause nest abandonment." (From an email from Daniel Sullivan, FWC to Steve
Godley Dated March 25, 2004.)
The original BEMP is stricken in its entirety. The original BEMP contains
information about the history of this eagles' nest, fledgling success and flight
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10,2005
Page 29 of 133
Page 6 of9
patterns of the birds. There is a section describing Biology and Habitat
Requirements of the Bald Eagle and the history of why the birds were added to
the Endangered Species list. Finally, the approved BEMP describes how
development will proceed and how the eagle will be protected, including an
education plan.
The amended BEMP is composed of sections of the Incidental Take Statement
from FWS to USACE written in two letters dated February 27, 2004 and July 14th
2004.
Section A. Project Description of the amended BEMP mentions a 35-s1ip marina.
Inclusion of the marina in the BEMP description does not constitute any review
or approval of a marina for this PUD.
The amended BEMP includes the two Reasonable and Prudent Measures for
reducing the likelihood of take and the five Terms and Conditions for
construction of the project listed in the Incidental Take Statement. The
construction would be phased to begin with development in the secondary zone in
the non-nesting season and would be allowed to continue during the next and
subsequent nesting seasons. Construction for the high-rises in the primary zone
would likely begin in consecutive non-nesting seasons, but be allowed to continue
during nesting seasons. Development closest to the eagle nest tree include a 20-
story high rise 50 feet from the tree and a lake 40 feet from the tree. In the
Biological Opinion, the FWS acknowledged that "Construction would eventually
occur within 30 feet of the nest tree." FWS further describes the effect of the
take: "The proposed action will result in the loss of productivity from one bald
eagle nest out of the 24 nests known to occur in Collier County. The total number
of nests in south Florida that have lost productivity due to permitted actions from
January 1, 2000, to date will increase to 11." One of the FWS requirements to
minimize the take will be that "... the applicant must make reasonable effort to
prolong the integrity of the bald eagle nest tree, the nest, and the surrounding
habitat. "
Also included in the BEMP is a voluntary proposal by the applicant to install an
artificial nest tree on a property to the north of Cocohatchee Bay. It is proposed
to be approximately 5000 feet from the existing nest tree and would be farther
than 1,000 feet from the Cocohatchee condominium construction area. The
construction and location of the tree must be according to Land Development
Code requirements and will require a Special Treatment permit since there is a
Special Treatment overlay on this land.
The Bald Eagle Management Phasing Diagram (Sheet 1 of 1) is conceptual and
building sites and infrastructure may be required to be modified during Site
Development Plan review.
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 30 of 133
Page 70f9
There are a large number of gopher tortoises in the primary zone of the eagle nest
tree. The FWC issued a gopher tortoise Incidental Take permit that did not
include the tortoises in the primary zone. A new state permit and County
relocation! management plan will be required for these tortoises at the time of Site
Development Plan (SDP) and must be updated for all tortoises on site. According
to the Land Development Code, gopher tortoises must be retained on-site if there
is adequate habitat for them to live in. In order for the applicant to relocate the
tortoises to the preserves in the golf course on the east side of Vanderbilt Drive,
they must provide density of existing tortoises in each preserve to insure there
will not be more than five tortoises per one acre of preserve during construction
while the preserves will be fenced. The golf course Site Development Plan is in
for an amendment, so these gopher tortoises will be addressed with this SDP and
the SDP for Phases II-IV of the development. The review of these SDPs will be
in accordance with the Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code
regulations for gopher tortoise protection.
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of PUDA-2004-AR-6786, "Cocohatchee Bay PUD"
with the following stipulations:
Environmental:
1. Revise Section E of the BEMP to read as follows:
"Should the current eagle pair or a second eagle pair build a new nest within
the PUD boundary, any r-evisioBs to the above Eieseribed terms lmd
eOBditiens reE:laired by the ageaeies listen abeve shall Bot r-equire an
amendment to this Bald Eagle Management Plan shall be reauired.
EAC Meeting
Page 8 of9
PREPARED BY:
LAURA A. ROYS
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
MICHAEL BOSI, AICP
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 31 of 133
DATE
DATE
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 32 of 133
Page 9 of9
REVIEWED BY:
BARBARA S. BURGESON DATE
PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
WILLIAM D. LORENZ, Jr., P.E. DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
SUSANMURRAY,AICP DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APPROVED BY:
JOSEPH K. SCHMITT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATOR
&
DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
(rJ
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 33 of 133
PETITION NAME:
DATE:
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING
FOR
ptJI) AMENDMENTIDO AMENDMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DMSION
CURRENT PLANNING SERVICES
1. Name of Co-Applicant (s)
Lod~e Abbott & Associates. LLC
. Applicant's Mailing A~dress 3400 E. Lafavette 8t.
City Detroit
State
MI
Zip 48207-4962
Applicant's Telephone Number:Res:
Bus.: 313-567-7000
Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? [8J Yes 0 No
o (a)
o (b)
If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name beneficiaries below.
If applicant is corporation other than.a public corporation, so indicate and name
officers and major stockholders-below.
I2l (c)
If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so
indicate and name principals below.
o (d)
If applicant if an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if
any.
o (e)
If applicant if a lessee, attach copy or lease, and indicate actual owners if not
indicated on the lease.
o (f)
If applicant is a contract purchaser; attach copy of contract, and indicate actual
owner{s) name and address below.
Lodge Abbott & Associates, LLC, Bryant Frank-Manager, Trident-Abbott, LLC, Member,
. SoaveManagement, Ine., Member
(If space is inadequate, attacb on separate page.)
2. Name of Agent Richard Yovanovich
Finn
Goodlette. Coleman & Johnson. P A
Agents Mailing Address ~ 4001 Tamiami Trail North, #300
City N aoles
State
FL
Zip
34103
Telephone Number: Res.:
Bus. 239 : 435-3535 x 256
RE-SUBMITTAL
PUDA-2004-AR-6786
PROJECT #19990002
DATE: 1/19/05
MIKE BOSI
Agenda Item No. '8B
May 10, 2005
Page 34 of 133
3. PUD ORDINANCE NAME AND NUMBER: Cocohatchee Bav Ord.#2000-88
4. DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THE APPLICATION (If
space is inadequate, attach on separate page. If request involves change to more than one zoning district,
include separate legal description for property involved in each district. If property is odd-shaped, submit
five (5) copies of the survey (I" to 400' scale). See attached .
THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLYING THE CORRECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
IF QUESTIONS ARISE CONCERNING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AN ENGINEER'S
CERTIFICATION SHALL BE REQUIRED.
SECTIONS 8.16.17 & 20
TOWNsmp
48
RANGE 25
5. Address or location of subject property
6. Does property owner own contiguous property to the subject property? If so, give complete legal
description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page).
See attached adjacent properties list
7. TYPE OF AMENDMENT:
A.
PUD Document Language Amendment - See Attached Amending Ordinance
181
D
o
B.
PUD Master Plan Amendment-
C.
Development Order Language Amendment
8. DOES AMENDMENT COMPLY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
181 Yes D No Ifno, explain:
9. HAS A PUBLIC HEARING BEEN HELD ON THIS PROPERTY WITHIN THE LAST YEAR? IF SO,
IN WHOSE NAME?_No
PETITION #:
DATE:
10. HAS ANY PORTION OF THE PUD BEEN 0 SOLD and/or 181 DEVELOPED? ARE ANY
CHANGES PROPOSED FOR THE AREA SOLD AND/OR DEVELOPED?
181 Yes D No
IF YES, DESCRIBE: (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY).
The PUD has been'approved under a number of ongoing development orders (site development
permitting); including, but not limited t1l:
. SFWMD ERP Permit#11-01882-P, approved December 2003
. US 41 FDOT Turn Lane Permit, approved 6-20-0 1, Vanderbilt Drive Overpass, approved 5-26-04
. Golf Course Site Development Plan Permit (AR 694), approved 9-04-01
. USACOE Permit, approved May 2002, modified #SAJ-2003-526 approved 9-16-04
. Right of Way Dedication in accordance with PUD conditions / stipulations
61/13/2605 08:43
23S556384El
Agend~ N6tB1J3
May 10, 2005
Page 35 of 133
Affidavit
I, Bryant M. Frank: being first duly swc1m, depose and say that L:>dg:lAbbott Associates
LLC, a Michigan limited liability comp my, is the owner of the property described herein
and which is the :iubject matter of th ~ proposed hearing; that all the answers to the
questions in this ,.pplication, and all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter
attached to and m'lde a part of this application, are honest and true: to the best of my
knowledge and beiief I understand his application must be completed and accurate
before a hearing CHn be advertised. L.)dge/Abbott Associates LLC further permits the
undersigned agent t::l act as its represent.itive in any matters regarding this Petition.
NOTE: SIGNATURES OF ALL OWN::RS ARE MANDATORY.
LCIDGE/ABBOrr ASSOCL~T1~LC
"? ../. /~r-
By: ----..t-ct; r:frI..v(.{.d=- ~
Bryant M. Frarf.
Its: Authorized Represenlative
GCiODI..IfP.E. COLEMAN & J'~HNSON. P A
By: ~ d-~
Richard Yovanovich
Its: Agent
State of Michigan
County of Wayne
The foregoir g Application was acknowledged before me this 27th day of October
2004 by Bryant M. Frank, who is personl!ly knO\\'!l to me.
.<tL\h 1~]Nf)
;~
_lh;rnb2.rl~_ l. S4ub6s
NOTARY PUBLIC
KI/>lIlEi<LY I..STUllllS
NO! ARY pur:LIC :;T ATE OF MrCH1CAN
\.\ ^ Y1\E COUNTY
MY COMM1:;SlON EXP. AUG. 26.2006
o.~ jj\j(). /~ WA.~l0e. J.
o QOu.~~l
01/13/2a05 08:43
2395663840
... . .. "..
County of Collier
State of Florida
Agenda ~oB8~3
May1'O, 2D'C5
Page 36 of 133
I HEREBY CEF.TIFY that on this clay before me, an offiCE~r duly authorized in the
state aforesaid and in t'1e county aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared
Richard D. Yovanovicr known to me to btl the person described in and who executed the
foregoing Affidavit and acknowledged be-bre me that he/she executed the same.
WITNESS my'.~ r.and and official seal in the county and state last aforesaid this
~O) day of r.r:--~ ,2004.
(S'EAL)
~ *' Katen C ~QI1
. ~ . My Ccxnmlll&iln DOQ&.&SIlO
~w";/ ~ifes Ogtot<< 14,2005
~ ~I
--:;. (':t....,z...n~. ~.e.IL.~"iS:~--.,
\lotary Public. State of ....:L,.l..-
p Y-A......~.......... ~ ~ ~r ",l-,:..,..,\Sr...~
" Prim Cammlnicnllld Name of NOIllI)' P\I '110) j
,1<1_ Old Nol _ Take At'! 001"
'et'llOnally Known JL OR PmdUC4d IdentinCl/.l'On_
":ype oIIClen\lnCll~OC'\ Produced ____
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 37 of 133
ORDINANCE NO. 05-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE
NUMBER 2000-88, KNOWN AS THE COCOHA TCHEE BAY
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ORDINANCE TO
PROVIDE FOR: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO LIST OF
EXHIBITS AND TABLES TO DELETE REFERENCES TO A
PORTION OF EXHIBIT "B", PUD MASTER PLAN WITH EAGLE
OVERLAY; SECTION TWO: TO DELETE EXHIBIT "B" PUD
MASTER PLAN WITH EAGLE ZONE OVERLAY AND BALD
EAGLE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW
EXHIBIT "B" ENTITLED COCOHA TCHEE BAY PUD BALD EAGLE
MANAGEMENT PLAN; AND SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE.
Whereas, on December 15, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners approved
Ordinance Number 2000-88, which established the Cocohatchee Bay Planned Unit
Development and
Whereas, Richard Y ovanovich, acting as agent for Lodge Abbott & Associates, LLC
petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to amend
Ordinance 2000-88 of the Cocohatchee Bay Planned Unit Development;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FWRIDA:
SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES
I. Exhibit "B" FUD Master Film with &gIe Zelle Overlay IIBd Bald Eagle
Management Plan
SECTION TWO: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT "B", PUD MASTER PLAN WITH EAGLE
ZONE OVERLAY AND BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Exhibit "Bn, PUD Master Plan with Eagle Zone Overlay and Bald Eagle Management
Plan, of Ordinance Number 2000-88, The Cocohatchee Bay PUD is hereby amended to delete the
Master Plan with Eagle Zone Overlay and Bald eagle Management Plan in their entirety and
replace them with a revised Exhibit "B", Bald Eagle Management Plan as follows:
1.(1 liiall<! "1iI:,,1.. (W"liaulu: h\l\lo.~pbaj\l: j"',Ii:o?\lif.'kalu':i
11 O'~\::In'elH;iO ,311 ':;ite
\.11 allt"... 19:01'1 .n~l" tl~.t i: JelOal11d 01' tItl!: iu 0'1 tIt.. "'.';1 del.. of
'\'oila",Il"iil Dli':~.>hewll on the flttlleli,,(\ )ite ptE1lil"re.:ety" IHf1):\.
. \"ilef(lin~ to fF':"CC rilil'}I'Q',. th~ ethl Ita~ bililfl acct','il fer at lilftCI Ill.. larit
- ;'~ar: "'itl1 Hil,t h~ing "'~R.:.n'cril'J in 1'''<;1 ffifwrill1t Ir..,(!'. Tl1il "UIl'Ant
l1znt V:fi" €01lNrr~lS~ea in ] :>)~ l?llui t11a ;:Jrigi6~J n2~~: tr.ez ~1:A.: .eut ~hsr?..11 in
199-:'. the He:.! bnd lilt edd/ fnl:ell. Tb<: 1,,1renr bj,{'/L 11.08:-<:<1 6n.: hate!;'!in;!:
ill 1 n':'l> ....:. 'lHi p"~j :'-'mg ,;!Urill? (11" -"II~''';' prnoi. Thil .II~-t i.: Ii? ';1tid in
a de,ul. Rt14 rEl13i81)' deten.araliui! I;;la..o11 Pill" tr.... .all t11<! ':-,,'.1 ~J:'Ii/'l..rli8R of
the p",J- U~). Thz Iree. L 18e,.t281.: e~. een .1 :Hlllll :(.? f.J.L~ l11flLh <lh1l\ fU1<i
rb.. "a:; f<.J1'lst nrUl.!!l"~".il :."'E1mp. TJw ':II"(!- 113','" all )p4il '1i'I>" I~ !ltlt
warer O';"t. th. I "'pc. of Ill;; mfUlJifr(. ';e:, 10 tll" ",-...:r. .'Llmo:1 all of the
e',IflBlisll<:R tree: b_!'\,il.oll Ilole net tree ml.l '/llllGilILjlt Drj-. e 11(';. <: die,oJ..
IH>lHl:; 'h, t... II fiJ", [11ft[ ('''.'!liT",>I "1.1 flu p"Jilo..n;- : "''',Ira I ;'.',1'. ..,~w .., t,J:lil
birElc aLe 1;,,,.... ~, rillati"OilJ:.-ll!leb:,w.I~(ila ','13"- 8f ':amlijlrBIlI Dri"lt. DMIt te
tll.: e311~h1i~ 11 of tl1~ tr~.:. i1 t.; 11.:11 e,~f:le"~d 11ml lh~ ':fl"je~ n:n <1<JIlIHlIle t...
Words struek tMeagh are deleted: words underlined are added
I
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 38 of 133
u;@ tlli 111;,,1 lBl31'@ than a ~911pll; of liierli! J'I;[HT at UH lB );t. It i& ltil.4f~
Iik@l:' that A r;IBfIU ":itllll~l\\'Y 'I.,it>fls ,':iYeithit. Qi'Al'@;;thi Iri@ &l.lf.lflsr:Rng
Ihe ileA 6f ;Ie~;tfe)' Hie ue,t il:.!el:f. II 15 1l:6t e1e~r ":;II\)l'e lke ea,@:le;; will try
iG :iilllW,I,.t l' niT lurt if thi: S"G\1l'( Spi.ilii" .,lnlll":atiBIlI; V'iiri naaili
mll'illg tlu !liLt \J.n .Wiling r;Sl\(ear: Ie UBI@ Right patl0111G ami fuiHHg
B~1ia';ier 61'0Ulicl Hie 11<::)(. T.8~:\~ I:lI!l,ef\,8aem slls'.yeti H11'lt Ai!illtJ ilite llllcl
6Yl ef the ~:l '.Vi!'le }Jleaemillotely te 1l1. :.e\lfli Alia :,nllil "",.~P.t Ham the
Hlct tn!@. ~@YlMll! ether d@,',ll ",illllii (Olu,'HBe thl! n@~t r;~r:I!~ ~.r; p@{da@~ fer
tl:e rrorelil". during ml! Reeting (;~a.efl. An affel1 wa~ HlllC{e 8:' the Ililfe8t
Ill!';!, Ie eeHlt!",let <'l .HZV,' ue)! aej.1~eftt 1< !he existiug loorina ~flrly ill the
'PP '{'f,) (~a">lR, ]}9"-.".r t11lilf iii iff~l:t.; n'Qri HIln"Oiif "ful
Biclogy ORa Habilat Re~lir<!f11~l'It:;
TIlil \JH!d .ag!. iL lhi lar~ld l'llpt@IIR:itl?rij,lQ, ell till ~i1flilt.wki l~ffleridrl.
with a wIIIg:&!,RI.l of al3ent serell feet. Bea:i pllllIlage is dark 81'0.....11 with
the aeaa aRE! tat! R !K}lineh;'s. ';;hite, Juveniles Ill'. 13re..."li a!aell ana full:!
l4i1':IlI@jJ thi ""hili hiiaQ and (@il by ll~ a~. ~If fin ~'r :11:
r:agki fYl~jeal1y lle~t etas. to wnlel 7,'itll tlkeir <flat eelHflricea 1lll\il.'ltY <If
fi,ft Imt 3\1pplelliealte<l ,,'..ith a ;atid.. f:lf :eI1e~1n1te3 iHekut!n~ allEle> fiRe
R.atte:. Thu:. n.1:,t( tll:IGI prQyisilllrQ:' llWilt1Ullitill( ill thi ':i>1lIII)'. !fllnl
..-i:.ibihty aud n elenr Right path.
}' n lRYlB~ ~ligll.r IR iarl;: fall Bad Ihi "aall (lli1tlill B.b!: "DB Bil @ rllit
:ll:rec aae e:~' fellt QUjl, HuoocJ '"ilb. &eft Hiat~nak :;I@:I li'I)UllRenl;'.
li7jng !lille ell" cj'flu',: tfZ~: [l1"e e1l3een ',YHUe :Slue eMIB\3:,' l'eraiUflJ Ztl'w:e
till! Be::! Tll@ mt:ie d '::nhlf Ii! 1311ti ea?e i: one 31' Will Bw,l illlfwrlBlll
zeaci<IGratiGll', aaot:!? leag it: l1U;: Q~t:: ilell: Bet illl'Riiti&h. aal?itat
;:,ifalJ.iJit:. of all araa r~lHins eou>llllll
~,gg h~:,~_ln~ F Jr:li:" in J:ilrl:,' I?'~9Qf'"lt?]f ana ^h'tsJIJ" lr.tlAU~" QQB&l:t €If ~1i9 w.
~\Y9 i~gL "jib. ill'ill1\:latten sf i!ltl!~l,"l"lt-H:a,\lel:: : 5 till::'. TaG ;-"Ullgf Rillltall
I1Fef Ie 12 \YeaL 111thEnI,cll parefllal ,"r2 ma:,' .clfttin':le 6 Ihtiher I tEl Ii
'H.!:. atlilr ~14t:. :18:' ef flel'ieJ'. ea,!!l. Fake or. :,'11;11 feunEl ri:iil.iB:t:
'(,hili thi Y">IR~ afi mi~;ltClf)'
III ,1:ldllislI tl; the !le:"lit:.~ tree, fk,ll'llal pereh :,ite:;Are IUl iHlj:lf.ll't1'll1:t 1'&1'1 ef
thi .1agdll': NR:iI~r:'. '~'Il.1n, l'kllill~ Ill. 8i?1lIlil.tiug r,ll11nn, ~Ilr~hing IlIa;'
1;M;@ lip ~ I g30. @f the cia:,. iF\\'~), ~..l~.tiell it &imilally ~a")~\ ,111 lilY""
Ill!>.;:}: j'lr;;:; L a',"i1ilable it: Ula ':iemit:; AmI 116'.'; "'.-ell H:e aira eml ,aa iT. 11m:
p"r~h :jt.~ Rr~ t:j.>i"alt:.- Inll.; BOI'I:lOlI'jjrJ 11:' all af'~ll arBa S1o!~h a: ri'.-~r 01'
la1;e ballk";
...., a t6F l"rzililtiill'Y eagie:, Are \'ullle\l1t~le Ie tile a',li1a l:tf oaf edHtAfl1!aiU'lti. ill
tRi t9~r1 s,Rain PgpuIAt.:en:j2~ ~n3[~4"-9rt1t:;' RH,,:tJd by tk~ 'XJ ef th:a
",niGilh g,gr (iii"'!: lolUlBIH~). "J.t.k riiGl<ZIl-i l'llflrElERI.il.viI suez_c" b:.
thit1J'lln,;: eg!!:;hell~. ieael ami lu",,'ew/ llaJ"il8Mli,. Ill"a on g81Rg eOIl.eflX,
~ 1w1til'l.. Eli )tHr"aBIl.."; to)" &t1'lllilIL af 1i.~tlllg l?inl. hnl l?iea ";j",',YIiI I" had
Illtinnt.l:' t"1 non ~1'aldQll:ro[lt ~palhl ::uw tlll'ilp;:)f~l l'9:MiQQ Iblll tllll
ne;t lite 011;;1 fed,jug: area) fire ZI:lBlpcneat: 81' Jp,i.::.. nltllhl;E!llleBt r-Iem.
Gi':~ mil g!lmeral reqllirlllll111U: fllrilu oJalagizroI ';H.~L @fllie eBgflll.. illi
lwei..'!.','. ef li.ew (k.d6~i!'l1l $l:l the l'rejeel,ite will aile\'.- eeutilR1Ea
HilllilatieJI U l!'H\"id.i:lsele......
".____"_4.~'-"_-".Si~I*v.elepmelH---f;.~B5.i<:-!effi4h"l1r: and S~-!e&- \[AHagemellt
~
THe GUlT@lll ute pial< 211/:"; fer QIO':elefluw.11 "f a !,-olf .ann" enl:' Tif;!l an
apliem (-8 eeHlil::l~t falufe re.jtelel:lllal eea.,wse1"leB :,ItJuta Ihe :,tie een.aiti81i3
Words liWek thr-eligh are deleted: words underlined are added
2
Agenda Item No, 88
May 10, 2005
Page 39 of 133
(;If maal'lg~H@>>t t~dmi"ln@: t:B~ag~ (8 all(;l'x it It r.h.,\llGl h@ BstilEl that
existing fligBt l~allL an! }:lfilQCliniaHlltly to tlle~outk and south 'Nilst aad a
far ~eittef Bren af ~le)zl-,'Z <mtemb fra1'll the 1lt:1t tne ta the ',"eJt. kuping;
tl1i siti iR a 1;;:1l1i1Jf :SllU~Ufafi?l1 t42 hsn. it i:. ~urnu)..tl:~ utiIiztEl l):. t;Hi
hifCk. The maiR i<)ra~ng araa i: the '.~riggin€ Pace e:;;ul'lrillil:y:rilll1 '.'!:aieh
l~ <lz)i~}f.ua (U O:lUiluJiug rI€lfiae 'lNl1t~r:, .::gO nerc.; ef '(;BieR will be
~el3J:ea 1:1:-; ealbZlY.ltieR -"C'cenullt te taz ~;€lHtIi rIeri<46 'Nat~
? ianageHH?at D15tril<t j3fe<;@f':i:u;l tal: Babita! ia }3ilI13i?tHit:'.
The IIi11"ital Maru'l:g:emcnt G:a.aeIiHe: (~t1Hin.ed ift tile ReeE1';:I:; I'lflll t'81' the
':e'J(a@lLhI11l States Bald Eagl~ eall f~r a J'lri,QJal~: ~rotill2tl0n Ztilihl. ill:I2i'J:lt
HliElir UtlQiit1al dr6:Um~t1IlCiK e~nio!llEliag "'7'} tG 1709 t'4itt Elllly:al'd g'on'! thi
:le~t !i\~C The pr.::eiJc Ji:tfliIU bcill~ (kp~fl8ent llFjfl the f.lr{lJtffilal aud
s]3!dal eenfi~Hr8tieil ef elitiefll d21Helit; .meR (I: tbe nest I'r.:e. feeding
Rl'Il,l, Had me,:! f.r~e:. 1>:", fisiEleatiHL C01HFll~r"ial. 81' iBAl:l:rrial
d.:'\'l.?j0pm~l1t.loggillg or mining 9aould occur witlliB tIn:. zone.
Tll.. sit.. plan !)r thl! gelf 6:8:11.',.1 R: pre}?\il>l!d }?l'ej.ms iate th~ '7'59 tc@t
primar:: 2'OlHil tel lb. l/RGt :1f Ill. Ihl';t tr.i It 1'_ He! iUilkiflatwd t11:lt thi: will
art;enely Rffe"t the engle'; beefut.K cf the e,d:.rin.~ eireUllDfflllee::j af rhe
:it". The:rz are 110 ~,;i;t:ll; li';i-B; tr~~s 'sitmli thi:.. fireR !ll:l~ IIi; birds
clllTeatl:' kiH a relall';ily USOBSf1'lleti?Q ':ill"".' cf ~:al.ll:lerbilt Dri':~. TIlii
golf CO'.lfse 'I;auld ret'l:lOYC :iome of the dead Jl:li'I~'; left in the are,1 but
oBs"rratien:; B':er the J3c,,,t tV;8 :("01':. liEl-;e :ho?;n tllBt llie:;ii! Sllflb:: Me Ilst
:ltili;:~d by tl]~ hirEl: fli'f raestillg or flUtbit:g, .\b". }light flath, into ana
gut €If thi HiLling <ir... 1."41'. in tk. OfFElsi!@ fhriet,lElH a1lC~ net e':jf thi ar-lii!
pfopescd to be ilHj3i'leted. A :ereen af 1i-';ill;:-;e.;:etatian '.:ill be t')1fll.]t<:a
1,)et":eiOll RI4 g€lf ~1?:Ir.:id (me! th~ Il1?,t :itid Ie ~'le6:l: ':1.4'."'> :1uQ'.tmml: eftha
.;relftrfC k€lm the ll"'Ct. Thi~ a<!tlElIl 'X8UJd n?i>lllt in a Bl:lfftlr Elf
.1pprmdn'lately 530 fuet to tJlc eilS! ofthz ne,'t. .\ buff-cr 0[:'50' '.HIUld be
.naintaine.i fa t.he :;;a:ut Ilfid fletik tif tfte: 11e.)!. Gud 11" l1Upllet:; ar~ j31'e:!w:;cd
te tRe 'l;@~.t b@FX~ilB thii Hi'" aile tha Gulf @f: IiiP.ae@.
Tc ffi.iffiul'iLc clbrnrbEllle< dtifin~ the iml"G1rtam mntin;: per168. a g:rester
~}affar Z@:R~ af I ~nQ' ia nhiiu: ":ill l;Jid i'~t!lblir'heQ anH IHlllnt",iniEl dating
Lit'" \ilga:f1-,,'sti:'u a:tl':iti4ls. }"@ i09RstfUGlti8R aGf:{';itiis 'xill take placlil
..,-ithin tfie 1500 feot zeRe durin; the nesting peri,)<1 'wllieh ran:) from
Oetas,! 1 tl'H'Gn~hMflY 1:.
ln2@IJlerBt~El t-llr'Jng.k9Ht thl! jt~ i:~ an eem:atifilil ?lan ~9R:isilng crf ::igm
ami 1)<1.:tiar; leeflt~a lit ~elf ;lele tli),L, With iflfsfllitlti,31l !Inti rieRlfia:, €If the
aahlt::lt.: and :;p~d~$ IG~a('O\d in the ';icinity 01' iBsh lwl@. hi tJ:Hs ',n)'
pla:'@r: and nh(l;mL v,"iH .f!:ain l:m''\'.'Ii?G1,E.!!i2 i'll'll'! as fl~pnl<iatieH of tilt'
:'y:jelll u: t4.1Z~' ]:11'13 .~"Je.:;~ tllf@U,;11 the ~our':,~, Th.z et:f1il ~.\'iI1 be hi~hlig:hf ed
l'It rhz J~pr(lpfi!lte leel'lti:li '.:-ith d,taiL an tll~ :1-" eei~3 bielei:.Y. eeelegy 8n6
el?ncin,'a>tiQ:R ctatu:;,
Words slnlek thfeugh are deleted: words underlined are added
3
""",,"~Wii;;oll)._"'~_'''.''''""''''"''-"''''''''''~
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10. 2005
Page 40 of 133
D I ~~ 8 0) CD
'-
\~ I ~~ ~~
i ~~
~ - ~~ ~~ I
~ ~~
). ~~ g
Po";
.~
11\ 'i ~~ ~
g " ~
~ :. ::l
~ 1 ;
f'I1
"
..,
~~~
.~iil
;g ~
~ Vi
~~i
~~~
~~~
~l~
!l\
JIB 1/
COCOIlATCIIEE DAY
PUD MASTER rlAN
WlTll EAGLE ZONE O\"E1tL\l
:~~ I , 1[\\
: :\y .rl ~k!!
114lt: ~-z,.ao PROJCCT'/r.J., 80205
VANASSE' 0.\\'1.01\ F/E:f. II-OS-00
&".. 1(." ....., Iklf.
.... 'OO
,............." """
SCl1.E: /I.r.s.
~ I/O. DD20S-PtJOlfI'J
Words atNek tBr91:1gh are deleted: words underlined are added
4
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10. 2005
Page 41 of 133
EXHIBITB
COCOHATCHEE BAY PUD
BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The fore';..t'jiu{[ Bald Faille Manu gmeent Plall ha~ been coordinated tllf01l2h. and
JPuroved b\". tbe Anu\' Com of Eu~illeer~ ("ACOE"1. the u.s. Fish & Wildlife
5er"ke ("'L'SnVS"l. and the Florida Fish & \Vildlife Conservation COlllJ.nl.ssioll
("FF\VCC"), 1
A PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The annlicallt orop,">sed to COnSTl1Kt fh'e hi eh-rbe cOnd01l111l1l1l11S (each J ~ to 20
stories)c. a social and fitness 'eIller. a 2011' dti"ing ramIe, j teunis courts. 2uest
cottages, varkim, ~U"eas. and stonll water mmJilzelllent facilities on a J 11.3-acre
12r9i~ftm5jt~.......Th~.i'PEli~m~!._;tli<L.PJ:QPQ,i~LgLSQ!1?.lmg.jl...J5:sJiQ.Jl1flnna..
Construction ,}ctivities assocIated with the urn!ect ",J!] 1II1Om::t 1.5:: acres of fresh
water wetland~ To compensate fOJ impacts to wetlands. the applicant has
proP,)~ed to purchase mJtil:!i\tion ,;:reLlits from nn approved mitisl.l1tion bank, To
COlllDellsate for unavoidable effects to bald ea~es at nest CO-19 the applicant
Pl'(lJ)()SeS to lJurchase and vreserl.'e suitable habitat for nestimt bnld eal:k~ in. or i.n
the \'icill!t\" of. c.:dlier (ountv. ill SOllthwe,t Florick1. The proiect site is located
north of 'Vigains Pas> :\laril1<< in SectiOn> 8, 16, 1 c. and 20. TQ\vnship 48 South,
Ran>.!e 2<; East CQllier Countv. Florida,
B TEP-\IS AND CONDITIONS"
]. III the evell! of proiect illllJlemelltmions. the entrv road. Honnwater pond.
parkinz area and zolf dub house area, will be cleared and cons/meted in
the first I1Nl-Jlestin~ season (Mav 16 throtlj~h SeDtember 30). Extenor
construction d the 2011' club home would also occur in the first llOll-
nestiu2 season.
")
..
Land clearill101 ilnd tlle initiation of cOllstmctioll e,f ce.ndol1linium 1ll1lUbel <;
also would be initiated in the nOll-nestil]il seaSOll (Mav 16 f1u'olll<h
SePtember 30) However. cOllStructi,1l] of this ] :'i-story buildinc. which is
anticipated to rake about 2 veal''' 10 complete. would not be limited to the
nQll-lle"til]~ sea<'Oll The ,ta~illi area for builf\lll~ nUlllber " would be at
the future location of bttildil12 number 1. Site c1eariuz for Ihe stagillg
are,'li, would occur in the S,11llC non-nestin!! period
3. III tbe ;,econd ll(!ll-nestiu~ ';eaSOlJ. ,;:ousrnlction of the rell1ainin..
recreationill facililies east of the access road (i,e" fitness facility, social
faciEtv. pool. cotta~cs and te!U1is areas) would be initiated and exterior
wnstmctiol1 cOllloleted. These facilities are intended t,1 be overational
upon cOllmletioll of the 2-vear constl1ll:1101l vhase It)r condominium
number ~.
4. Land c1eanmt .md the mitiation of cOllstmction of the :o.storv
condominium (lltunber 4) likelY would 11e2111 ill the next non-nestiml
seaS011 deoendiuz 1.111 economic condition"-. The pad tor condominitml
numher I would ilijilin serve ilS the still;ill8: area for condominium number
4, 11110 a!mli,ant agrees that the st;ut of constmcliOll of condominium
number<. 5, 4. and 1 would he initiated onl\" m the lloll-nestin~ sea'iiOn{s).
111e con-tm-;:tioll stan clates of these cOl1dolllilliUillS likelY would be In
, II 3CC""';3 -~ mtD lh~ FLU tov81 dared D',cemb",
8rori~ and buildwp e:5 1$ 1 )-!$to:rie~
; Pr,Yilft':" U17fCT1ce arei!. Nor O'DMl [c> tht'" nubb("
.. Biolo!I!r-a! OniUHH} d~He.d F~h'll13n' 27':::00':; Pa?:e 14
O~ s~Ati in tl tT.:', '.5-
Words swek tMeagh are deleted: words underlined are added
5
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 42 of 133
consecutive non-nestin!!: seasons. but couJd be: delaved based 011 the
ecoumny.
C. ADDITI0KAL TERMS AND CONTImONS~
The ACOE 11,\& requested the CSfWS to modify the f'ebruar:v 1") 2004 biolo~kal
opinion for the O;1{;ohatchee development based 011 modifications to the proiect
J)rmlosed bY the applicant -nle USfWS has reviewed the proposed proiect
moditications and notes that they win result ill the addition of the rOIlOWnl!! t\yO
(2) items to the Tenus and Conditions SectlOll of the biololIical cminion~
1. TIle constmctioll ()f condominiums numbers':; aud 3 Cilll be initiated only
durin,; the nL1n-lleqini season (1I..1av 16 throuilh September 3m. However.
once initiated constmction activities call catTY over tIn'oncl1 the nestin~
season until the C.ollst1"m:tiou of each c(\l1(lomimum is cOlllpleted.
1e 8 ) ) liC8 t r, a' 'e d to nl''' a <;e ad) 'e, 'e, 11 () 's' e ha 1d ea e
neslin1/: tenitorv prior to the initiation of construction activities for the
proiect. Secll1illl! a tel11mr\' may be ill the ft111l1 of fee ,im!)le title or a
conselyutiou easement to be ~ranted to an acceptable third party. The
lenitorv mnst include mfficiellt area to accol11111o<lnte <lltemate nest trees
in the event ill"t the prnnarv llest tree is lost. TIle applicant will use best
efforts to locate and secme a t"rritory in Collier COllnty, but reserves the
ri~ll! 10 search elsewhere if all acceotable contract call1lot be secured in
Colli\lr Couutv. Site .,e!ectioll criteria are as fonows~
il Preferenc" will be ,"iyen to.,d"cti(l!l of 11 DlIrcel that lJresentl v .,utlPorh
m::tive nesting by bald eagles, bul a parcd that supports suitable habitat tor
attl'.'1ctimo: ,md SUf)1JOIUllll: nestill!O: bald ell\!les IlIa\! also be considered
acceptahle.
it) Preference \vill be ziven. bnt not hmited 10. selectlon of a parcel of
;,uitable habitat th.m IllS been selected and rallked as II c,)uservatioD
mion!'.' for !lreser'mtion bv lI\leIH:V n1'Ocess.
iii) Premixit\! to other cOllserviltionlands beina manaued or identified for
preservation and 1l1111lll~emellt proximity to k1ra~in\J areas size Ctwet'
~,tpes. and presence of other ~pecies of COI~"el'Vatioll concern will be
considered for 5ekel:i011 of a parcel of suitable habitat for nesTiu2 bald
e:a~Les,
D. DlSCRETlOKARY CONSER\'ATlON ~lEASl.ffi.E6
The apnlicanl has ex-messed an inlere.,t in construdin!j: a ':;0- to 60-1'00\ artificial
nest tree on a salt 111\t <1Vproximatelv ~,oon feet northwest nf the existill~ nest tree
TIle purpose of the artificial nest Iree is to ascertain if eagles that are uliliznl!! nest
CO-19 will relocate to the adiacent artitkial tree. This specit1c location was
chosen because it is Within the teI11tOl~/ of the eagles that He;,1 at ("(>-19. farther
than 1.000 feet tl'olll the proposed cond(,miuium constmctkHl area. well buffered
ii'om other !}olential contlicting land use,. and '.'fill minimize disturbance TO
wetland resou!\;es. The zeotedmical emnneer (ASC Geuse!''."ice;,. Incol'lmrllled)
;,u~~est that actual fill for the ha"e >tmcttl1'~ in the saJt nat wetland ",ill be limited
to a 25-square 1'iJot area. and call be pile driven by a crane from a t1oatinll: barge
Water depth, are adeqll<1te to reach the site, and representatives of the South
Floril'k1 Water lvfanagemeut District wlll aCCOm0811Y th", cOlltractor c!tllin:o: barging
and tree lll'itallation to ensure ihat el1Y!l'Ollluel1tal dmu<lge will be minimized. TIle
~ A.meuded Bloh,lQ}caJ Oom!on "lated. June: 30. 2004 fJl.u"!;;u.au( to il. reouest for letter' of tf'<hnical ~h8ii).tallce
fr01:U Colht"f C'cm.nr\.., Page 4- i
t Biolo2"ic-nl Oninion date-d FebnlafV 1'7 ")004 oafle 1 -i
Words strliek threagh are deleted: words underlined are added
6
,"""_",""jj/lljNiill"i__~',""lilH"",;",..",:,,,,,,,,,.,,,
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 43 of 133
wetland impact.<, ns>ociated with artificial tree installation are considered to be de
minh/JUS
The nrtificinJ nest tree will \l5e technolo IZV deyeloped 1'01 1110no])01e cell towers
WIth artit1ciill bark. limb5 and needles matchll1lZ thilt of a mature slash pille \vitlI II
crotch con1illLU'mion snitable for cOllstmction of il nest bv hald ea>rl~. The tree
\vill be desiwed ttl withstand 140 mph winds. be li2htni1l2 proof and constmcted
of lion-toxic materials. EXillllPJes of this techno.lozv can be found al manufacturer
",ensites such as w"\vw.naturemakers.com or 'www.ntilltvcamo.colll. The
i\J)plic~1!lt nlso pWlJoses to install a video camera ill the nest tree to IJrovide the
re5idents of COColL1tchee Bav and other interested parties with an of)JJortlluitv to
monitor callie nestim;r behavior. The tmal cleslws of the base. the nest tree. ,Uld
the camern will be submitted to the Seryice.
E. CR~',GES TH.A.T AFFECT THE ABOVE TER','IS /L'\D CO~DITIO~S
Anv revision bv the Ann..- Corp of Encineers IAC-OE). the U.S. FIsh & Wildlife
Service fT 'SF\.VS 1. and the Flolid<l Fish L\.~ \Vildlife Conservation C:olllmissi(lll
:FFWC-C\ that lillI''' cause re\'isil1n of the aho....e described temls and conditions
will not re,)1nre fmiller Amendment of the Coc.ohatchee PUD or this Bald Efude
Mnna!iemenr PlnH. Should the Clll1'ellt ea~le pair or a second en~le pair build a
new nest within the PLD bonndar\'. anv reyisioIlS !O the aboye described ten))s
and conditions required bv the iH!encies listed above shall lIot reQuire an
amendment to this Bald Eal!le I\I ana gemellI PIau All\! such changes will be
J)roces~d adllllllistr,1tivelv bv the PlaJUllll2 Director and '-hall become conditions
of this Bald Eaale 1\lru.lagC111ent Plan.
F. PRA.cSINO PLA.c:K
III accordallce wlIll B So: C al.hwe. a phaSing diagram has beeu mcluded for
reference. See Attachment I.
G. REASO:KABLE A~~D PRI;DENT MEASt..7RESr
1. For the duratlOll of the prolect. the ilpplicant 11m,t take all nece<;sarv Qe.J1S
,0 minimize the potential for incid.ental take of bald eagles dUrlll2 each
nestial< o,ea;,011. Dtuiml: the construction of the proiect. the ;'ll)J)licant l1l1lSt
make reasonnb.le effort to prolollli: the illte~tv of the bald eaStle nest tree.
The nc~t. and the SUlTOlllldJul! halli!:JI.
[)POll the Oll;:,,,t of the ne;:,tiu2 seaSOll each veal' of 0;011,>t111,tlon (October
J I. the applicant llJust initiate 1I1onitoli1l2 accordmg to SelYJce draft
lllonitoring ll'uith:lill;:;.. to detect the vresence of bald ea !!Ie, 011 the uroket
site and. if llresent. any abnoll11al bald eaale behavk,l'. si.nce site work and
building cOllstmctJon within tlle Prlmarv zone is IJroposed to occur dunuz
the neslin;: seaS011 This monitmillg con"ish of -I bOHrs 1),,1' lllomin:!. for 3
dayS per week willie construction IS OCCUlTUHl:
<;;: ,'--'C't't c-,t'.,f '~:-eetia ~ll.' '. Jar T ')1)04
.) FromBio!o~ical Onlmon dat~d F"'!bruan" '7 '':1004 '02BY~ 1 :;-14
'1 (1
Words swek tftreligh are deleted: words underlined are added
7
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 44 of 133
N
w*.
s
C~
,""'. JOO!l
SC4t::rES
PROPOSED
ARTIPlC/At TREE
/ WCATJON
I /~
'I'~f
,.lG6~)
~\ L"
1.0
l
I-.
..J
~
l..J
~~
~a
: PUD 80UNDAf?'Y:
BUIWING 150 P/W:TlI:.f ~
8U/WIN(; #>to 0
EAGLE BUJLfJING Iyo
NEST .
LOCATION
BUILDING 12 0
BUILDING # I
N'PR0JI8IA1f
PIlWfCT
E/t'IRNICE
NOTE> THE SJ'U PtAN SHOWN HDff.ON IS
CONCEPTUAL A/IIJ 18 NOT TO BE
USED AS A lIAS TEll DEVELOPIIEIIT
fILAlL FINAL DlIIM MAY rARY
rttTH tIIRI1ITTIIG.
L
!I WIGGINS
PASS
, ROAD
COCOfU, TCHU ".
&Wl1A GU IlAllAfIlIIf!NT
PIIA.. DfAMAM
11 REV/seD JANUARY 2005
"1
-.. Vanasse. ..."""'! T..",,~'l -... .-
10#7 ~~. [,*,_d1S1it'.cll VIrWIif MIn II LtC ~PlU1
..... (1ft hpnrt( It IU 5OiiT~0ri....Sciill(lJ u,.:=-
1l)f17-oo:II Daylor ~J""~''''''''''' ltIpIu,f_J<JIJl
~'Mllm.l,)llf! (2J1) 5iB.m Sbtel No.1 or1
-;; IIIiii .UU\}4tN 11l14H4I' ... -
.....- ,.,.. .........
ATTACHMENT J
Words stfliek threagh are deleted: words underlined are added
8
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10. 2005
Page 45 of 133
SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filling with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County, Florida, this
day of
,2005.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and
Legal Sufficiency
MlIIjorie M. Student
Assistant County Attorney
Words s1ruek thFSIigB. are deleted: words underlined are added
9
\
COCOHATCHEEBAY
A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN
GOVERNING COCOHATCHEE BAY A PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF
TIlE COLUER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
PREPARED FOR:
v ANDBRBn..T PARTNERS U. LID
PREPARED BY:
PMS.. INC. OF NAPLES
2335 TAMIAMl TRAIL NORm
SUITE 408
NAPLES, FL. 34103
DATE REVlEWED BY CCPC
DATE APPROVED BY Bee
ORDINANCE NUMBER
AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL
DOCUMENT DATE
EXffiBIT "A"
I ,../I~.....
;Z IfJdA- "iT
12/14100
Agenda Item No,,8B
May 10, 2005
Page 46 of 133
iNDEX PAGE
List of Exhibits and Tables n
Statement of Compliance m
SECrION I Property Ownership, Legal
Description and Short Title 1.1
SECTION II Project Development 2.1
SECTION ill Residential Development Areas 3.1
SECTION IV Golf Course I Open Space 4.1
SECfION V Preserve District 5.1
SECrION VI General Development Commitments 6.1
I
_.~ ~ r -"-.- . -.-..-------..
f
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 47 of 133
L ---T"....
. LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES
EXHIBIT "An
Planned Unit Development Master Plan
EXHIBIT .'D"
PUD Master Plan with Eagle Zone Overlay and
Bald Eagle Management Plan
TABLE I
Land Use Summary
TABLE n
Development Standards
n
Agenda Item NOd.8B
May 10, 20.05
Page 48 of 133
..-.-.. -. ..-.----..
i /,
,
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 49 of 133
The development of approximately 532.09 :t acres of property in Collier County as a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) to be known as Cocobatchee Bay pun will be in compliance with the goals,
objectives and policies of Collier County as set fonh in the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
Cocohatchee Bay is a mixed use residential golf course community and will be consistent with the
. applicable elements of the CoUier County Growth Management Plan for the fonowing reasons: .
1. Traffic ways. utilities, and other public facilities necessary to serve the Cocoharchee Bay Project
are adequate. The Cocobatchee Bay Project will participate in the expansion of existing public
facilities to the extent of its impact on those facilities via payment of impact fees.
2. The Cocohatchee Bay Project will be compatible with and complimentary to existing and
planned land uses in the vicinity. Project lands lie in a transition area which includes low-rise
residential development ~ high-rise multi-family development
3. The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community faciJitiesand
services permits the Development's residential density as described in Objective 2 of the Future
Land Use Element
4. The project Development is compatible with and complementary to existing and future
surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element.
5.
The property was down-zoned during the Zoning Re-evaluation Process which resulted in an
action establishing several zoning districts and densities:
Parcel I - 11.19 acres RSF-3st - 33.57 units
ParcelS - 161.63 acres RSF-4 - 646.52 units
Parcel 6 - 13.15 acres RSF-4(3) 39.45 units
Parcel 7 - 69.61 acres RSF-3st(3) 208.83 units
RSF-3(3)
RMF-6(3)
RMF-6st(3)
Parcel 8 194.60 acres RMF-12(3) - 583.80 units
RMF-12st(3)
Parcel 9 1.26 acres RMF-12st(3) - 3.78 units
Parcel10 80.65 acres RMF-12st(3) - 241.95 units
RMF-6st(3)
TOTAL 532.09 acres - 1757.90 or 1758 units
The PUD will utilize a total of 590 units on 532.09 :f: acres for a gross density of 1. 11 dwellings
per acre. This action makes the land use and density consistent with the Future Land Use
Element of the Growth Management Plan.
ill
Agenda Item No.,8B
May 10, 2005
Page 50 of 133
6. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable sections of the Collier County
Land Development Code as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element.
7. The project Development will result in aD efficient and economical allocation of community
facilities and services as required in Policies 3.1.H and 3.).L of the Future Land Use Element
8. The project Development is planned to protect the functioning of natural drainage features and
natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in Objective 1.5 of the Drainage
Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element
9. All fma110cal development orders for this Project are subject to Division 3.15, Adequate Public
Facilities. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC).
IV
--1.'."-'
~-~-------_._.._---
I "
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 51 of 133
SECTION I
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP & GENERAL DESCRIPTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property. and to
describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name
of COCOHATcHEE BAY.
1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1
TIlE SOUTHERLY 548 FEET OF A TRAcr OF LAND LYING IN SECITON 8, TOWNSHIP
48 SOUTH. RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID TRAcr BEING
DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT TIlE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT
4, SAID SECfION 8, RUN S.88024140''W. (SHOWN IN ERROR AS S.88~6'40''W. IN O.R.
BOOK 68. PAGE 235; O.R. BOOK 87, PAGE 439 THROUGH 447; O.R. BOOK 167, PAGE
692; O.R. BOOK 218, PAGE 484; HEREINAFI'ER CITED AS OFFICIAL RECORDS),
ALONG THE soum LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 4 AND TIm WESTERLY
PROLONGA nON OF SAID SOU1H LINE, FOR 776.71 FEET, TO AN INTERSECIiON
WITH AN AGREED BOUNDARY LINE AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 87, PAGES 439
THROUGH 447 (SURVEYOR'S NOTE: ALTIlOUGH O.R. BOOK 167. PAGE 692 AND O.R.
BOOK 218. PAGE 484 INDICATE TIfA T TIlE AGREED BOUNDARY LINE IS FOUND IN
O.R. BOOK 68. PAGE 235, THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCE ARE IN EFFBCf THOSE
RECITED IN A LATER EXCHANGE OF QUIT CLAIM DEEDS O.R. BOOK 87, PAGES 439
THROUGH 447), OF TIm PUBLIC RECORDS OF COllJBR COUNTY, FLORIDA;
THENCE RUN N.2~11'40"W., ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE. FOR 300 FEET; THENCE
RUN N.3000'00"W., ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE, FOR 961.43 FEET
(SHOWN IN ERROR AS 961.30 FEET IN TIm OFFICIAL RECORDS); 1llENCE RUN
N.67030'00"W. ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE, FOR 1397.99 FEET (SHOWN
IN ERROR AS 1397.01 FEET IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS); TIlENCE RUN
N.22031 'OOIW., (SHOWN IN ERROR AS N.22030'OO"W. IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS),
ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE, FOR 944.72 FEET; TIlENCE RUN NORTH,
ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE, FOR 99.92 FEET, TO AN INTERSECIlON
WITH 1HE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORm LINE OF GOVERNMENT
LOT 3, SAID SECTION 8; THENCE RUN N.OO08153''E. (SHOWN IN ERROR AS NORm IN
nIB OFFICIAL RECORDS), FOR 429.82 FEET; TIIENCE S.59000'00''E., FOR 815.68 FEET,
TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF 1HE NORTH
LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 3; THENCE RUN N.89012120''E.. ALONG SAID
WESTERLY PROLONGATION AND ALONG THE NORm LINE OF SAID
GOVERNMENT LOT 3, FOR 1907.82 FEET, TO THE NORTIIEAST CORNER OF SAID
GOVERNMENT LOT 3, THENCE RUN S.OOO23'1 O''E.. ALONG TIm EAST LINE OF SAID
GOVERNMENT LOT 3 AND SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 4, FOR 2744.30 FEET, TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING. pLus ANY LAND ADDED THERETO BY ACCRETION OR
RELICTION, AND LESS AND ACCEPT ANY LAND LOST THEREFROM BY
SUBMERGENCE OR EROSION.
1.1
I,
Agenda Item NO..8B
May 10, 2005
Page 52 of 133
PARCEL S
THE NORTIlWEST 114 OF SECfION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 2S EAST.
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPTING THEREFROM nm RIGHT -OP.W A Y FOR
ST A TB ROADS S-86SA (ALSO KNOWN AS V ANDERBIL'f DRIVE) AND S-865B (ALSO
KNOWN AS WIGGINS PASS ROAD).
PARCEL 6
THAT PART OF THE NORTHERLY ONE-FIFI'H (BEING MORE PARllCULARL Y
DESCRIBED BY ACCURA TB SURVEY AS THE NOR1lI 268.54 FEET) OF TIlE NORTH
1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA WHICH LIES WEST OF THE RIGHT-OF- WAY OF U.S.
mGHW A Y 41 (AlSO KNOWN AS TAMIAMI TRAIL).
PARCEL 7
TIIB EAST 1/2 OF TIlE NORmEAST 1/4 OF SECfION 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,
RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUN1Y, FLORIDA, EXCEPTING nlEREFROM THE
SOU1HEAST 1/4 OF THE SOurHBAST 1/4 OF mE NORTHEAST 1/4 AND EXCEPTING
THEREFROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF STATE ROAD S-865A (VANDERBILT DRIVE).
PLUS ANY LAND ADDED THERETO BY ACCRETION OR RELICI10N. AND LESS AND
ACCEPT ANY LAND LOST THEREFROM BY SUBMERGENCE OR EROSION.
PARCEL 8
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH.
RANGE 2S BAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN N.8!r'54'20"W.. ALONG mE
SOUI'H LINE OF SAID SECTION 17, FOR 2839.52 FEET TO AN INTERSECI10N WITH
AN AGREED BOUNDARY LINE AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 68, PAGE 235
TIlROUGH 2SO OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF COILIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE
RUN N.OIO)()'OS"B., ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE, FOR 1298.10 FEET
(SHOWN IN ERROR AS 1300.00 FEET, IN O.R. BOOK 68, PAGE 235 AND O.R. BOOK 167,
PAGE 642 HEREINAFTER CITED AS OFFICIAL RECORDS); TIlENCB RUN .
N.30ooo'OO"E., ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE, FOR 800 FEET; THENCE RUN
N.05000'00''W., ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE, FOR 1480 FEET; 'fHENCE
RUN N.29011'4Q''W., ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY ~ FOR 1957.41 FEET. TO
AN INTERSECTION WITH TIm WESmRLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORm LINE OF
SAID SECTION 17; THENCE RUN N.88024'40''E. (SHOWN IN ERROR AS N.88~6'40"E. IN
THE OFF1CIAL RECORDS), ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 3449.51 FEET TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SBCI10N 17; THENCE RUN S.0~7'30''E., ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 17, FOR 2690.04 FEET (SHOWN IN ERROR AS 2689.35
FEET IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS), TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER; THENCE RUN
S.O~6'OO''E. (SHOWN IN ERROR AS S.OO26'OO"W. IN TIlE OFFICIAL RECORDS), ALONG
TIm EAST LINE OF SAID SECI10N 17, FOR 2584.65 FEET Tq THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; EXCEPTING TIiEREFROM (l) THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, (2)
THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF TIlE SOUTHEAST 1/4, (3) THE NORTIIEAST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHEAST 1/4, OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, ALL IN SAID SECTION 17; AND
EXCEPTING mE RIGHT-OF.W A Y FOR STATE ROAD S-86SA (VANDERBILT DRIVE).
AND EXCEPTING TIlA T PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST l~
1.2
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 53 of 133
OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SEcrION 17, TOWNSHIP 48 soum, RANGE 2S EAST,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM nIE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST
1/4 OF THE SOUTIiEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 17, RUN
S.890S3'18"W. FOR SO FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN
S.890S3118''W., FOR 186.65 FEET, TO A POINT ON BULKHEAD LINE AS SHOWN ON
PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN BULKHEAD LINE PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 7, OF THE
PUBUC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; TIiENCE RUN S.41011'03"W. FOR
133.10 FEET, ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE; THENCE RUN S.oo06'42"E., FOR 120
FEET, THENCE RUN N.89053'18''B., FOR 275.72 FEET, TO A POINT ON 1HE WEST
RIGHT -OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD S-865A (V ANDERBll.. T DRIVE): THENCE RUN
N.0~6'OO''W., FOR 220 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PLUS ANY LAND ADDED
THERETO BY ACCRETION OR RELICTION, AND LESS AND ACCEPT ANY LAND
LOST THEREFROM BY SUBMERGENCE OR EROSION.
PARCEL 9
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SEcnON 17,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOum, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS: FROM A POINT OF BEGlNNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
TIlE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OFTIIE SOU1HEAST 1/4 OF SAID SBCTION 17, RUN
N.8904O'5S''E., FOR 560.24 FEET, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4
OF TIlE SOurHBAST 114 OF SAID SECTION 17, TO A POINT ON TIlE BULKHEAD LINE
AS SHOWN ON PLATTHERBOF RECORDED IN BULKHEAD LINE PLAT BOOK I,
PAGE 7, OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF COILIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN
N.0~6'OO'W., FOR J()() FEET, ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE; TIiBNCE RUN
S.89040,5S"W., FOR 560.23 FEET, ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE, TO A POINT ONTIiE
WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOU1HEAST 114 OF SAID SECl10N 17;
THENCE RUN S.0~'411'E., FOR JOO.OO FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PLUS
ANY LAND ADDED nlERETO BY ACCRE110N OR RBUGnON, AND LESS AND
ACCEPT ANY LAND LOST nIEREFROM BY SUBMERGENCE OR EROSION.
PARCEL 10
BEGINNlNG AT THE SOUIHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH.
RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN N.890S2'20"W.. ALONG THE
soum LINE OF SAID SECTION 20, FOR 2053.75 FEET; lHENCE RUN N.OOOI4'OOJlW.
FOR 1698.91 FEET; TImNCE RUN N.S4047152"W., FOR 399.32 FEET, TO AN
INTERSECTION wrrn AN AGREED BOUNDARY LINE AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK
68, PAGES 235 1HROUGH 250, OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY.
FLORIDA; THENCE RUN N.79017'10''E., ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE, FOR
69.60 FEET; THENCE RUN N.020S9130''W. ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE
FOR ]417.66 FEET (SHOWN IN ERROR AS 1475.01 FEET IN O.R. BOOK 68, PAGE 235);
TIIENCE RUN N.2701S'20"W., ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE FOR 705.31
FEET; TIlENCE RUN N.18044'30"W., ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE FOR
887.03 FEET, THENCE RUN N.OSo37150'W., ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE
FOR 393.34 FEET, TO AN INTERSEcnON WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SEcnON 20;
THENCE RUN S.89054'20"E., ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2839.52 FEET, TO TIlE
NORTIlEAST CORNER OF SAID SECI10N 20; THENCE RUN S.02012'00"E., ALONG THE
1.3
'-'-1---' . ... .. _..-
Agenda Item No. ,8B
May 10, 2005
Page 54 of 133
EASt LINE OF SAID SEcnON 20. FOR 5273.90 FEET (SHOWN IN ERROR AS 5277.24
FEET1N O.R. BOOK 68. PAGE 235) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PLUS ANY LAND ADDED TIIERETO BY ACCRETION OR RELICTION, AND LESS AND
ACCEPf ANY LAND LOST THEREFROM BY SUBMERGENCE OR EROSION.
AND LESS AND ACCEPf mE RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF STATE ROADS S-865 A (ALSO
KNOWN AS VANDERBILT DRIVE) AND S-846 (ALSO KNOW AS BLUEBILL AVENUE).
AND LESS AND ACCEPT TIm FOlLOWING DESCRIBE REAL PROPERTY:
AlL OF WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO.1 ADDmON. ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT 1HEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, AT PAGE 81 OF TIiE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ALL OF WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS
UNIT NO.1 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK la, At
PAGE 44, OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNI'Y, FLORIDA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT mE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 4 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS
LANDINGS UNIT NO.1 ADDmON; THENCE N.89052'20"W. ALONG THE SOUlHBRL Y .
LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 599.96 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID LOT 4. THE SAME BBlNG THE SOunIBAST CORNER OF LOT 10. BLOCK 1 OF
SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO.1; THENCE N.8~52'20"W., ALONG TIlE
SOUTHERLY UNE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO.1 A DISTANCE OF
1400.65 FEET TO nIB SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS
UNIT NO.1; TIIENCE N.oooI400"W.. ALONG THE WESTBRL Y LINE OF SAID WIGGINS
PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO.1. A DISTANCE OF 1608.90 FEET; TIIENCE N.34026'15''E.,
ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 439.38 FBBT TO A POINT ON nIB
NOR1lIERLY ONE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO.1; THENCE
N.87048'OO"E. ALONG SAID NORnmRL Y LINE A DISTANCE OF 1481.48 FEET TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK 3 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT
NO.1; THENCE 8.02012'00'13. A DISTANCE OF 163.77 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT I, BLOCK 3 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO.1;
THENCE N.87048'OO"E. A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO 1HB NORTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE S.02012'OO''8. ALONG TIlE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID
WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO.1, A DISTANCE OF 668.16 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I.-BLOCK 1 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT
NO.1, THE SAME BEING THE NORTIIEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF SAID WIGGINS
PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO.1 ADDmON; THENCE 8.02012'00''8. ALONG THE
EASTERLY UNE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO.1 ADDmON. A
DISTANCE OF 1209.93 FEET TO TIm POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 88.56
ACRES, MORE OR LESS (BEARINGS REFER TO WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO.1
ADDmON. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT TIIEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10.
PAGE 81 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA).
PLUS ANY LAND ADDED THERETO BY ACCRETION OR RELICI10N, AND LESS AND
ACCEPT ANY LAND LOST THEREFROM BY SUBMERGENCE OR EROSION. .
..
AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRffiED REAL PROPERTY:
1.4
to
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 55 of 133
A PORTION OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST 1/2 OF SECfION 20, TOWNSHIP 48
SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOILOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOlITHEAST CORNER OF TIlE SOU1lIEAST 114 OF SAID
SECITON 20; THENCE N.02012'OO''W.. ALONG TIlE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID
SOUllffiAST 1/4 A DISTANCE OF 1970.20 FEET; THENCE S.87048'OO"W Of A DISTANCE
OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON mE WESTERLY RIGHT -OF-WAY LINE OF
VANDERBILT DRIVE, A 100.00 FOOT RIGlIT -OF-WAY AND THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF LOT 1 BLOCK 3, WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS, UNIT NO.1, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, AT PAGE 44, OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE SAME BEING THE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE S.8704800"W.,
A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WT 1;
THENCE N.02012'OO''W. A DISTANCE OF 163.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF LOT 3, BLOCK 3, OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT I; THENCE
S.87048'OO''W. ALONG THE NORTHBRL Y LINE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS,
UNlTNO.l, A DISTANCE OF ]481.48 FEET; THENCE S.34026'lS"W. AWNG TIlE
NORTIlWESTERL Y LINE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS, UNIT NO.1, A
DISTANCE OF 439.48 FEET TO TIlE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TRACf B,
BAKER-CARROLL POINT, ACCORDING TO TIm PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 8, PAGE 42. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUN1Y, FLORIDA; _
THENCE N.54047'52''W., ALONG TIlE NOR1lIERLY LINE OF SAID BAKER-CARROL
POINT, A DISTANCE OF 399.32 REET, TO AN INTERSEcrrON wrrn AN AGREED
BOUNDARY LINE AS RECORDED IN OFFlCIAL RECORDS BOOK 68, AT PAGES 235
THROUGH 250, OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE
N.79017'10'rs., ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 69.60 FEET;
THENCE N.0509'30''W.. ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE. A DISTANCE OF
1417.66 FEET; THENCE N.2701S'20.'W., ALONG SAID AGREED BOUNDARY LINE A
DISTANCE OF 616.67 FEET; TIIENCE N.87048'OO''E., A DISTANCE OF 2472.71 FEETTO
A POINT ON TIlE WESTERLY RIGIIT-OF-W A Y LINE OF SAID VANDERBILT DRIVE;
THENCE S.02O) 2'25"E.. ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1.373.11 FEET;
THENCE S.o2012'OO"E. ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 667.03 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, PARCEL CONTAINS 100 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
13 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
The subject property is owned by A.L. Dougherty Co. Inc., a Delaware Corporation.
1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPI'ION OF PROPERTY AREA
A. The Project site is bordered on the West by the Delenor Wiggins State Park and Barefoot
Beach County Park, on the East by Tarpon Cove PUD and Wiggins Bay PUD, on the
South by the Dunes PUD and on the North by Arbor Trace PUD and the Retreat PUD.
B. The zoning classification of the project prior to approval of this PUD document was .
RSF.3 (3), RSF-3ST (3), RSF-4, RSF-4 (3), RMF-] 2ST (3), RMF- J 2 (3), RMF-6 ST(3),
RMF-6(3), and A-ST.
1.S
-.~~_._-
Agenda Item No. ,8B
May 10, 2005
. Page 56 of 133
1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
A. The Project lies within South Florida Water Managcment District No.6. Drainage from
the property will discharge into Cocohatchee Bay
B. Water Management Facilities for the Project will be designed and constructed in order to
introduce project stonnwater runoff to wetland areas in an attempt to assist in the
restoration of historic water retcntion and preservc areas.
C. Elevations within the Project site range from 1.5 to 11 feet above mean sea levcl. Most
of the area. however, falls within the 10' to 11' foot clevation category. The site lies
within Flood Zone AE (EL 11 ') and AB (EL 12') according to Finn Maps
120067-01910,01870. and 1890. dated June 3.1986.
D. Soil types within the Project include Ken fine sand (approximately 50%), Cypress
Swamp (approximately 48%) and Charlotte fine sand (approximately 2%). Soil
characteristics were derived from the Soil Survey of Collier County, Florida, issued by
the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Soil Conservation Service) in March, 1954.
1.6 PROJECT DFSCRIPTION
The Cocobatchee Bay PUD is a residential and golf course community with a maximum of 590
dwelling units. Recreational facilities including a golf course. clubhouse. maintenance facility.
caddie quarters. and guest suites will be provided in conjunction with the dwelling units.
Residential and recreational land uses are designed to be harmonious with one another in a
natural setting by using common architectural themes. appropriate screening and bufferlDg and
open space.
1.7 SHORT TITLE
This Ordinance sbaU be known and cited as the "COCOHA TCHEE BAY PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE."
1.6
'----r--
. - . ..' ,.-.--'-- .------
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005 .
PageS? of 133
SECTION II
PROJECT DEVEWPMENT
2.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the Project plan of development.
relationships to applicable County ordinances. the respective land uses of the tracts included in
the Project, as well as other project relationships.
2.2 GENERAL
A. Development of Cocohatchce Bay shall be in accordance with the contents of the .PIanncd
Unit Development document and applicable sections of the Collier County Land
Developnient Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of issuance of any
development order, such as, but not limited to, Fmal Subdivision Plat, Final Site
Development Plan, Excavation Permit. and Preliminary Wolk Authorization, to which.
such regulations relate. Where these regulatioDS fail to provide developmental standards.
. then the provisions of the most similar district in the County Land Development Code
shall apply.
B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of aU tenus shall be the Same as the definitions set .
forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building
pennit application.
C. All conditions imposed and all graphic n1aterlal presented depicting restrictions for the
development of the Cocohatchee Bay PUD shall become part of the regulations which
govern the manner in which the PUD site may be developed.
D. Unless modified, waived or excepted by this POO, the provisions of the LOC, whele
applicable, remain in full force and effcct with respect to the development of the land
which comprises this PUD.W
E. Development permitted by the approval of this Petition will be subject to a concwrency
review under the provisions of Division 3.1 S, Adequate Public Facilities, of the LDe at
the earliest or next to occur of either final SDP approval, final plat approval, or building
permit issuance applicable to this Development.
2.1
'.--r-'--" -...---- .--
Agenda Item No.,8B
May 10; 2005
. Page 58 of 133
2.3 .DESCRI"PTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES
. A. The Project Master Plan, including land uses for the various tracts, is illustrated by
Exhibit" A:' the pun Master Plan. The nature and extent of land uses wiUlin the Project
are indicated on Table I. The specific location and size of individual tracts and the
assignment of dwelling units thereto shall be determined at the time of detailed site
. development planning or platting.
B. The fmal size of the recreation and open space lands will depend on the actual
requirements for water management facilities. golf course layout, roadway pattern, and
dwelling unit size and configuration.
COCOHATCHEEBAY
LAND USE SUMMARY
TABLE I
MAXIMUM LAND USE INTENSITY SUMMARY
1!SE
MAX. D.U.'sl Square Footale
ACRES
Residential "Rl"
480
44.00 +/-
Residential "R2"
90
9.70 +/-
Golf Course "OC"
20
170.39 +/-
Open Space Nt A
(Preserve. Lakes and Landscape Buffers)
Total 590
308.00 +/-
Total 532.09 +/- acres
2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Prior to the recording of a Record Plat, and/or Condominium Plat for all or part of the
. PUD, final plans for all required improvements shall receive approval of the appropriate
Collier County governmental agency to ensure compliance with the PUD Master Plan. the
Collier County Subdivision Code, and the platting laws of the State of Florida.
B. Exhibit "A," the PUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Development Plan.
Subsequent to or concurrent with PUD approval, a preliminary subdivision plat, if
applicable, shall be submitted for the entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan. Any
division of propeny and the development of the land shall be in compliance with Division
3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code, and the platting laws of the State of
Rorida.
2.2
. -.-.., _. .
I
Agenda Item No.88
May 10, 2005
Page 59 of 133
C. The provisions of Division 3.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code, when
applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts or parcels of land as
provided in said Division prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development
order.
D. The development of any tract or parcel approved for residential development
contemplating fee simple ownership of land for each dwelling unit shall be required to
submit and receive approval of a Preliminary Subdivision Plat in confonnance with the
requirements of Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code prior to the
submittal of construction plans and a final plat for any portion of the tract or parcel.
E. Utility, road, public and private easements shall be established as required during the SDP
and/or plat approval process.
F. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructure improvements
regarding dedications and the method for providing perpetual maintenance of the
common facilities.
2.5 MODEL HOMES I SALES OFFICES
Model homes, sales centers and other uses and structures related to the promotion and sale of real
estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions. viewing platfonns, gazebos, parking areas, tents, and
signs, shall be permitted principal uses throughout the Cocohatchee Bay pun, subject to the
requirementS of Section 2.633.4. of the Collier County Land Development Code and all other
applicable sections. Sales facilities will be permitted prior to final plat approval as provided in
said Section 2.6.33.4.
2.6 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN
Amendments may be made to the PUD as provided in the Collier County Land Development
Code, Section 2.1.3.5.
2.7 ASSOCIATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS FOR COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE
Common area maintenance will be provided by the Master Property 'Owners' Association. The
Association is a legitimate alternative for the timely and sustained provision of quality common
area infrastructure and maintenance undec the tel1ns and conditions of County development
approval. For those areas not maintained by the Master Association. the Developer has created a
property owners' association(s), or condominium association{s), whose functions shall include
provision for the perpetual maintenance of common facilities and open spaces. The Master or
the property owners' association, as applicable, shall be responsible for the operation,
maintenance. and management of the surface water and stormwate.r management systems, and
reserves serving the Cocohatchee Bay PUD, together with any applicable pennits from the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and South
Florida Water Management District.
2.3
-T--.--' ... ..
Agenda Item No, BB
May 10,2005
Page 60 of 133
2.8 DFSIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
1be Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage ingenuity,
innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development of relatively large tracts of
land under unified ownership or control, as set forth in the Collier County Land Development
Code, Section 2.2.20.2.3.
The Applicant has not set "stages" for the development of the property. Since the property is to
be developed over an estimated ten (10) year time period, any projection of project development
can be no more that an estimate based on current marketing knowledge. The estimate may t of
course, change depending upon future economic factors.
. 2.9 GENERAL PERMITTED USES
Certain uses shall be considered general pennitted uses throughout the Cocohatchce Bay
Community PUD except in the Preserve District. General permitted uses are those uses which
generally serve the Developer and residents of the Cocobatchee Bay PUD and are typically part
of the common infrastructure or arc considered community facilities.
A. General Permitted Uses:
1. &sential services as Set forth under the Collier County Land Development Code,
Section 2.6.9.1.
2. Wawr management facilities and related structures.
3. Temporary sewage treatment facilities.
4. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural bank
treatments.
S. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control stnlctures.
6. Community and neighborhood parks, recreational facilities, community centers.
7. Temporary COnstnlction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and
the Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary
access ways, parking areas and related uses.
8. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences
and waIls which shall be in accordance with the Collier County Land
Development Code in effect at the time permits are requested unless otherwise
specified herein.
9. Any other use which is comparable in namre with the foregoing uses and which
the Planning Services Department Director determines to be compatible.
2.4
i
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 61 of 133
B.
Development Standards:
Unless otherwise set forth in this document. the following development standards shall
apply to stnictures:
1. Setback from back of curb or edge of pavement of any road - FIfteen feet (1 S')
except for guardhouses. galehouses, and access control structures which shall
have no required setback.
2. Setback from exterior property lines - One half (112) the height of the structure.
minimum of twenty feet (20').
3. Minimum distance between structures which are part of an architecturally unified
grouping - Five feet (5 ').
4. Minimum distance between unrelated structures - Ten feet (10').
5. Minimum floor area - None required.
6. Minimum lot or parcel area - None required.
7. Sidewalks, bikepatbs, and cartpaths may be placed within County required
buffers; however the width of the required buffer shall be increased
Proportionately to the width of the paved surface of the sidewalk, bikepath, or
cartpath.
8. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and otbel' land uses where such
standards are not specified herein, are to be in accordance with the Collier County .
Land Development Code in effect at the time of Site Development Plan Approval
2.10 OPENSPACES REQUIREMENTS
The PUD Master Plan identifies approximately 483 acres included in the Recreation, Golf
Course, Landscape/Open Space, Lakes and Preserve District designations. These areas equate to
approximately 91 percent of the Project and fully satisfy the open-space requirements of Section
2.6.32 of the Collier County Land Development Code.
2.11 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS
Twenty FIVe Percent (25%) of the viable naturally functioning native vegetation on site shall be
preserved.
2.5
--., ----
2.12
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS
Agenda Item No, 88
May 10,2005
Page 62 of 133
A. A perimeter berm sball be constructed in conformance with Section 2.4.4 of the Land
Development Code.
1. Trees and shrubs shall be planted along the base of the berm so as to visually
soften the appearance of the side of the benn.
2. Ground cover on the side of be berm shall form a dense attractive mat, and shall
not require mowing.
3. Trees shall be a minimum of 75 percent native species.
4. Shrubs shall be a minimum of 35 percent native species.
B. A minimum landscape area of thirty-five feet (35') shall be developed along the
Vanderbilt Drive frontage. Said landscape buffer OD the west side of Vanderbilt Drive
shall include development features that impede the view of high rise residential stnlctures
from Vanderbilt Drive.
2.6
-T
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 63 of 133
SECTION In
RESIDENTIAL "R" DEVELOPMENT AREAS
3.1 PURPOSE
The pmpose of this Section is to establish land use regulations and development standards for the
residential development tracts designated on Exhibit "A." the PUD Master Plan as "Rl" and
."R2"".
3.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS
The maximum number of dwelling units permitted within the pun is 590.. The subject property
contains a gross acreage of 532.09 +/- acres and base density of 1.] 1 dwelling units per gross
acre.
3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Areas designated as "Rl" and "R2" on the PUD Master Plan arc designed to accommodate
high-rise residential dwelling unit typeS, multi-family dwellings, adult living facilities,
compatIble nonresidential uses, a full range of recreational facilities, essential services, and
customary accessory uses.
The approximate acreages are indicated on the PUD Master PIan. These acreages are based on
.conceptual designs and are approximate. Actual acreage of all development tracts will be
provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in
accordance with DivisiOn 3.3 and Division 3.2, respectively, of the Collier County Land
Development Code. Residential tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways, open
spaces, parks and amenity areas, lakes and water management facilities, and other similar uses
found in residential areas.
3.4 USES PERMrITED
A. Principal Uses
1. Multiple-family dwellings.
2. Guest suites and cabanas.
3. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and
which the Planning Services Department Director determines to be compatible in
the "R I" and "R2" Districts.
3.1
L__-_____l~
Agenda Item No.l8B
May 10, 2005
Page 64 of 133
B. Accessorv Uses
1. Uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted.
2. Recreational uses such as, but not limited to, clubhouse. fitness center, health spa,
tennis courts, swimming pools or similar recreational uses.
3. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature .with the foregoing uses
and which the Planning Services Department Director determines to be
compatible in the "Rl" and "R2" Districts.
3.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the UR" Residential
Districts.
B. Standards for parking, landscaping. signs .and other land uses where such standards are
not specified herein or within the Cocohatchee Bay PUD, are to be in accordance with
Comer County Land Development Code in effect at the time of Site Development Plan
approval. Unless otherwise indicated. required yards. heights. and floor area standards
apply to principal structures.
C. Off-street parking required for multi-family uses shall be accessed by parking aisles or
driveways which arc separate from any roads which serve more than one development. A
green space area of not less than ten feet (10') in width as measured from pavement edge
to pavement edge shall separate any parting aisle or driveway from any abutting road.
D. In the event the Developer builds the multiple family housing placed in the ai:ca between
Tarpon Cove and Falling Waters, a minimum of 30 percent of the multiple family
housing shall be offered to employees of the golf course with purchase price or rental
rates consistent with traditionally accepted housing costs to income ratios.
3.2
,..' .- -- .--...-.----
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 65 of 133
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS "Rl" "R2"
IDGH-RlSE MtJLTI-FAMILY
Muld. FamDy DwelUDp
MbdDlllm Lot Area N/A 1 Acre
Minimum Lot Width N1A N1A
Front Vard . Interaal Road .J O.S ~H not less O.S BH not less
than 2.S feet than 2S feet
Front Yard . Accessory Bldg. 0.5 BH nolless 0.5 BH not less
Including Parkiug Structure than 2S feel than 25 feet
Front Yard. VanderbDt Drive BH NlA
Froot Vard . Accessory Bldg. SO NJA
Side Yard 0.5 BH ]S
Rear Yard PrIncipal 0.5 BH IS
Rear Yard Accessory IS 10
Maximum Bldg Height 20 stories for a maximwn 35
beight of 200 feet *2
DistaDc:e Between Prillclpal Structures 0.5 SBH *3 0.5 DH not less
than ]5 feet
Floor Area MID. (S.F.) 1800 SF 1200 SF
COCOBATCHEEBAYCOMMUMTY
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
TABLE I
Jill: (BuildinS Height): Building beighl shall be the verdcaJ dbtance meuuRd from lbe first habitable finished Roorelcvatlon to Ibc
uppermost fmished ceiling elevalion ot'tbe suuctun::.
S!Uf: (Sum of Buildinl H~sht): Combined height of two adjacent bulldinp for the pwposes of dctmninin. setbKk rcqu~m=tl.
All distInces an: in feet unless othelwise noted.
* I Front yaftls shaD be measured as follows:
A. If the parcel is served by a public riptoOf-way. setback is measured from the adjlceat riJht-of-way line.
B. If the parcel is senred by a private road, setback is measured from !he bact of curb (If curbed) or edge of pavement (if not
curbed).
*2 Building height for !he north property line .djacelU to Arbor Trace in the "RI" tract shall be IS stories for a maximum height of
) SO feet.
*3 When: buIldings wlfh a common an:h.ilectunl dJeme arc angled, skewed or offset from one another. and walls are not pllrallcl to one
another, Ihe setbacks can be administratively reduced.
3.3
Agenda Item No..8B
May 10, 2005
Page 66 of 133
SECTION IV
GOLF COURSE "GC" DEVELOPMENT AREAS
4.1 _ PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the uses pennitted and development standards for the
Golf Course tracts. The primary function and putpOsc of these tracts will be to provide
aesthetically pleasing open areas. golf course and recreational facilities. Bxcept in areas
authorized for Development, all good quality native trees and shrubs shall be protected and
preserved wherever practicable.
4.2 pERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used.
in whole or in part, for other than the foJIowing:
A. Pennitted Principal Uses and SbUctureS
1. Golf courses and golf club facilities, caddie quarters, clubhouse, guest suites,
including teinporary golf clubhouses.
2. Project infonnation and sales centers.
3. Community and golf course maintenance areas. maintenance buildings, essential
services, irrigation water and effluent storage tanks and ponds, water and
wastewater treatment plants, utility pumping facilties and pump buildings, utility
and maintenance staff offices.
4. Any other principal use which is comparable in natme with the foiegoing uses and
. which the Planning Services Department Director detclmineS to be compatible.
B. Pennitted Accessory Uses and Structures _
1. Accessory uses and struCtures customarily associated with the principal uses
pennitted in this District.
2. Pro-shops, practice areas and ranges. golf cart barns, rest rooms, shelters, snack
bars and golf course maintenance yards.
3. Retail sales of associated recreational equipment and apparel, such as, but not
limited to, golf, tennis. and other recreational related equipment apparel and
accessories.
4. Restaurants and related uses intended to serve club members and club guests.
4.1
'----......'1----
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 67 of 133
S. Shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, health spas, swimming pools, and all other
types of accessory facilities intended to provide recreational opportunities for
members.
6. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature
trails, bikeways, landscape nurseries, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers,
picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters.
7. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses
and which the Planning Services Department Director determines to be
compatible.
4.3 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
A. Principal structures shall be set back a minimum of twenty feet (20') from Golf Course
District boundaries and private roads, and twenty-five feet (25 ') from all POO
boundaries.
B. Accessory structures shall be set back a minimum of ten feet (10') from Golf Course
Disttictboundaries and private roads, and twenty feet (20') from all POO boundaries and
residential tracts.
c. Lighting facilities shall be arranged in a manner which will protect roadways and
residential properties from direct glare or unreasonable interference.
D. Maximum height of structures
1. Principal Stnlctures - 2 stories for a maximum height of 20 feet.
2. Accessory Structures - 1 story for a maximum height of 15 feet.
E. Minimum distance between principal structures - Ten feet (10').
F. Parking for the community center/clubhouse shall be three spaces per every one thousand
(1,000) square feet of gross floor area, which shall be considered inclusive of the required
golf course parlcing, provided the golf course and recreational facilities are private, .
otherwise, applicable provisions of the Land Development Code shall apply.
G. The golf course maintenance building shall be located a minimum of 1750 linear feet
west of U.S. 41.
H. Standards for parking, landscape, signs and other land uses where such standards are not
specified herein, are to be in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code in
effect at the time of Site Development Plan approval. Unless otherwise indicated,
required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures.
4.2
-\
Agenda Item No.' 88
May 10, 2005
Page 68 of 133
SECTION V
PRESERVE "P" DISTRICT
5.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to identify pennitted uses and development standards for areas
within the Cocohatchee Bay Community designated on the Master Plan as the Preserve District.
5.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Areas designated as. Preserve on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of
conservation and limited water management uses and functions. The primary purpose of the
Preserve District is to retain viable naturally functioning wetland and upland systems, to allow
for restoration and enhancement of impacted Or dcgiaded wetland systems. and to provide an
open space amenity for the enjoyment of Cocohatchee Bay Community residents. .
S.3 USES PEB.MITFED
No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected altered or used, or land used. in whole or .
in part. for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses
1. Passive parks. passive recreational areas, boardwalks.
2. Biking, hiking. and nature trails.
3. Golf cart paths are pennitted in the preserve areas outside the limits of the bald
eagle primary zone.
4. Wildlife sanctuary.
S. Pathways and or bridges.
6. Recreational shelters, in Preserve upland areas.
7. Drainage and water management facilities as may be required by SFWMD.
8. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses
and which the Planning Services Department Director detennincs to be
compatible.
5.]
5.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 69 of 133
A. Setback requirements for all structures shall be in accordance with Section 3.2.8.4.7.3. of
the Collier County Land Development Code, as amended. Any lot abutting a
protected/preserve area shaIl have a minimum 25 foot setback from the boundary of such
protected/preserve area in which no principal structure may be constructed. . Further the
plat shall require that no alteration, including accessory structures, fill placement,
grading. plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be pennitted within such
setback without the prior written consent of the Development Services Director. In no
event shall these activities be pennitted within ten feet of the preserve boundary.
B. Maximum height of structures - Twenty-five feet (25').
C. Minimum distance between principal stlUctures - Ten feet (lO').
D. Minimum distance between accessory structures - Five feet (5').
E. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are
not specified herein arc to be in accordance with the Collier County Land Development
Code in effect at the time of Site Development Plan approval. Unless otherwise
indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures.
5.5 PRESERVE DISI'RICT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
A non-exclusive conservation easement or tract is required by CoUierCounty Land Development
Code, Section 3.2.8.4.7.3. for 1aiKfs included in the Preserve District. In addition to Collier
County, a non-exclusive conservation easement may also be req~ by other regulatory
agencies with jurisdiction over Preserve District lands. In addition to complying with provisions
of the Collier County Land Development Code, said easement shall be provided in accordance
with the terms set forth in any applicable permit granted by other agencies. The Developer, its
successor(s) or assigns, includini the Master Property Owners' . Association shall be fCsponsible
for control and maintenance of lands within the Preserve District.
5.2
--T-'
Agenda Item No.' BB
May 10, 2005
Page 7-0 of 133
SECI'ION VI
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
6.1 . PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the developmeot commitments for the development of
the project.
6.2 GENERAL
All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with fmal site development plans, final
subdivision plats, and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this
PUD. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of
the Land Development Code, Division 3.2 shall apply to this Project even if the land within the
PUD is not to be platted. The Developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsil;)Je for the
commitments outlined in this document.
The Developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the Master Plan and the regulations of the
PUD as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning
of the property. In addition, any successor or assignee in title, is bound by the commitments
within this agreement.
6.3 PUD MASTER PLAN
A. Exhibit" A," the PUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is
conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries or speciaI land use
boundaries.; shall not be consuued to be specific and may be adjusted during the platting
or site development plan approval process. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.S.
of the Land Development Code, PUD amendments may be made from time to time.
B. All necessary casements, dedications, or otbcr instruments shall be granted to ensure the
continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities .and all common areas in the
Project.
c. The following shall be considered mInor changes and refinements, subject to the
limitationS of POO, Section 6.3A:
1. Reconfiguration of preserve areas, jurisdictional wetland limits, and mitigation
features as a result of environmental regulatory agency review, as long as the
changes do not cause additional impacts to protected species or habitat.
2. Reconfiguration of lakes, ponds, canals, or other water management facilities
where such changes are consistent with the criteria of the South Florida Water
Management District and Collier County and where there is no further
encroachment into preserve areas.
3. Reconfiguration of golf course envelopes and design features where there is no
. encroachment into preserve areas.
6.1
~
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 71 of 133
4. Internal realignment of rights-of-way other than a relocation of access points to
the PUD.
5. Reconfiguration of residential parcels when there is no encroachment into
preserve areas.
6.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENTIMONlTORING REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISION
A. Initiation of construction on the Cocohatchce Bay Project is contemplated in calendar
year 2000 with completion of the golf course and Project infrastructure anticipated to
occur in calendar year 200012001. Marketing of commercial and residential sites and golf
course memberships are to begin in calendar year 2000, and are expected to be concluded
in calendar year 20 I O.
B. Monitoring Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Section
2.7.3.6. of the Collier County Land Development Code.
C. The Cocohatchee Bay PUD shall be subject to the Sunsct Provisions of
Section 2.7.3.4 of the Land Development Code.
6.5 POLUNG PLACES
Pursuant to Section 2.6.30. of the Land Development Code, provision shaJl be made for the
future use of space within 8 common building for the purposc of accommodating the function of
an electoral poning place.
An agreement sbaU be recorded in the official records of the Oerk of the Circuit Court of Collier
County, which shall be binding upon any and all successors in interest that acquire ownership of
such common areas including. but not limited to, condominium associations, homeowners'
associations. that such common facilities may be used for an electoral polling place if determined
to be Decessary by the Supervisor of Elections.
6.6 . SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARD DESIGN SUBSTITUTIONS
A. Sidewalks I bike paths shall confonn with Subsection 3.2.8.3.17. of the LOC.
Due to the environmental issues on this Project iinpactS are to be minimized.
B. Private streets shall confoon with the right-of-way width requirements of Subsection
3.2.8.4.16.5. of the LDC except as follows:
l. Cul-de-sacs and local streets less than one thousand feet (1,000') in leng.th arc
required to have a minimum fifty foot (50') right-of.:-way width and two ten foot
(10') wide travel Janes as required by Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.5.
2. All other cul-de-sacs are required to have a minimum of fifty foot (50')
right-of-way width and two ten foot (10') wide travellanes as required by
Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.5.
6.2
------T ..
3.
Agenda Item No.,aB
May 10, 2005
Page 72 of 133
Tangents between reverse curves shall not be required under Subsection
3.2.8.4.16.10. of the Land Development Code.
4.. Street grades may exceed four pcreent (4%) under Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.14. of the
Land Development Code provided that applicable Florida Department of
Transportation, Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (FOOT MUMS) and
AASHTO criteria are met
5. LDC Subsection 3.2.8.3.19.: The standard that street name markers shall be
approved by the Development Services Director and conform with the FlOrida
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Manual on
Unifonn Traffic Control Devices are waived. The requirements for street
pavement painting, striping and reflcctive edging of the main road system will be
waived. Traffic circulation signage shaU be in conformance with Florida .
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Manual on
Unifonn Traffic Control Devices standards.
6. LDC Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.8.: The minimum back of curb radii for internal roads
shall be 30 feet with the exception of both entrance road intersections which shall
be 40 feeL
6.7 TRANSPORTATION
A. The Developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital costs of any
traffic signalS necessary at Project accesses when deemed warranted by the County
Engineer. The traffic signals will be designed, installed, owned. operated, and maintained
by Collier County. The Developer shall provide arterial level sueet lighting at all Project
accesses prior to the issUance of any certificate of occupancy for a building accessed from
a Project entrance.
B. The Developer agrees that Collier County reserves the right to disallow developer
improvements within Vanderbilt Drive, EastIWcst Livingston Road, and/or Wiggins Pass
Road rights-of-way if such improvements conflict with Of negatively impact public
roadway, drainage, or utility facilities planned as part of future four-Ianing construction.
C. The Developcc shall provide additional right-of-way in fee simple title, when necessary.
along the PUD frontage to Vanderbilt Drive. Additional right-of-way is required in
varying widths from 10 feet to 2S feet on both sides of Vanderbilt Drive as shown on the
final four-lane design plans prepared for Collier County by Johnson Engineering, Inc.
Such required right-of-way along each side of Vanderbilt Drive shall be dedicated and
conveyed to Collier County without consideration for impact fee credits for public
roadway, drainage, and public utility improvements. The ~ght-of-way conveyance shall
occur at the time requested by the COW1ty.
6.3
.---
~._- . .__.
Agenda Item No. aB
May 10, 2005
Page 73 of 133
D. The Developer shall provide additional right-of-way in fee simple title, when necessary,
along Vanderbilt Drive and Wiggins Pass Road at all proposcdand authorized access
points wherein right turn lanes for development purposes are required or specified. Such
additional rigbt...of-way is declared to be compensating right-of-way and accordingly will
not be subject to road impact fee credits. The final four-lane design plans prepared for
Collier County by Johnson Engineering, Inc. do not show required right-of-way for right
turn lanes for this pun, but the right-of-way shall generally be of a typical width of
approximately 15 feet. The right-of-way conveyance shall occur at the time requested by
the County.
E. The Developer shall provide the additional 10 feet of right-of-way in fee simple title,
when necessary, along the PUD frontage to Wiggins Pass Road. Additional right-of-way
is required in varying widths on the north side of Wiggins Pass Road as shown on the
final four-lane design plans prepared for Collier County by JohnsOn Engineering, Inc.
Such required right-of-way along Wiggins Pass Road shaU be dedicated and conveyed to
Collier County without consideration for impact fee credits for public roadway, drainage,
and public utility improvements. The right-of-way conveyance shall occur at the time
requested by the County.
F. The Developer shall provide additional right-of-way in fee simple title, when necessary,
along the POO's north boundaIy for future EastIWest Livingston Road between
Vanderbilt Drive and U.S. 41. The Village Place pun directly to the north of this PUD
has dedicated 67.S feet of right-of-way along its southern property line for the future
EastlWest Livingston Road. 100 feet of right-of-way along the northern property line for
future EastlWest Uvingston Road shall be dedicated to the County. Such required
right-of-way shall be dedicated and conveyed to Collier County for public roadway,
drainage, and public utility improvements. Collier County shall compensate the
Developer for the right-of-way based on professional land appraisals of the fair market
value based on its value prior to approval of the PUD. The right-of-way conveyance shall
occur at the time requested by the county.
G. The Developer shall design and pay for any required road improvements to Vanderbilt
Drive that will provide access for the Project (this includes turn lanes and other
improvements such as lighting). If these improvements are made prior to the construction
of the County's Vanderbilt Drive four-lane expansion project, the Developer shall pay the
design and construction costs related to access for the Project for tbe existing two-lane
section of Vanderbilt Drive. Future four-lane expansion of Vanderbilt Drive shall include
the Project's access and shall be designed and paid for by the County during the
construction of Vanderbilt Drive. If these improvements are made after the CODStnJction
of the County's Vanderbilt Drive four-lane expansion project, the Developer shall pay all
design and construction costs related to access for the Project.
6.4
Agenda ltem No! 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 74 of 133
H. The Developer shall meet the stormwater attenuation and water quality requirements for
the future EastIWest Livingston Road between Vanderbilt Drive and US 41. The
Developer shall be compensated for the stormwater management commitments at a rate
to be determined. The Project shall accept future stonnwater commitments from
EastlWest Livingston Road along the Project property line in the form of water quantity.
Water quality will be handled within the 167.s' right-of-way reservation.
I. The Developer shall design noise mitigation/abatement systems in accordance with the
Collier County Land Development Code.
J. In the event the County four-lane improvements to Vanderbilt Drive or Wiggins Pass
Road precedes the development of this Project's access to Vanderbilt Drive, the
Developer shall bear the full cost for the access and appropriate turn lanes.
6.8 UTILITIES
The development of this PUD Master'Pllm lball be subject to and governed-by the following
conditions:
A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission lines to serve the Project are to be
design~ constructed. conveyed, and/or owned and maintained in accordance with
Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17, as amended, and other applicable County rules and
regulations.
B. All customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage collection facilities to be
constructed will be customers of the County and will be billed by the County in
accordance with the County's established rates.
c. The on-site water distribution system serving the Project must be connected to the
District's water main and must be consistent with the main sizing requirements specified
in the County's Water Master Plan and extended throughout the Project. During design
of these facilities, the following features shall be incorporated into the distribution
system:
1. Dead-end m~ shall include dead-end flushing hydrants.
2. Stubs for future system interconnection with adjacent properties shall be provided
to the property lines of the Project at locations to be mutually agreed to by the
County and the Developer during the design phase of the Project.
6.5
-----.- .
I .
G.
..----,. . ... - -..-
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 75 of 133
D.
A water distribution system shall be constructed throughout the project development by
the Developer pursuant to all current requirements of CoDier County and the State of
Florida. Water facilities constructed within platted rights-of-way or within utility
easements as set forth in Collier Counly Ordinance 97-17, shall be conveyed to the
County Water/Sewer District for ownership, operation and maintenance. All water
facilities constructed on private property and not required by the County to be located
within utility easements shall be owned, operated and maintained by the Developer, his
assigns or successors.
E.
All construction plans and technical specifications and proposed plats, if applicable, for
the proposed water system must be reviewed and approved prior to commencement of
construction.
F.
A sewer distribution system shall be constructed throughout the project development by .
the Developer pursuant to all current requirements of Collier County and the State of
Florida. Sewer facilities consttucted within platted rights-of-way or within utility
easements as set forth in Collier County Ordinance 97-17. shall be conveyed to the
County Water/Sewer District for ownership, operation and maintenance. All sewer
facilities constructed on private property and not required by the County to be located
within utility easements shall be owned, operated and maintained by the Developer, his
assigns or successors.
All construction plans and technical specifications and proposed plats, if applicable, for
the proposed sewer system must be reviewed and approved prior to commencement of
construction.
6.6
. Agenda Item NO.18B
May 10, 2005
Page 76 of 133
6.9 ENVIRONMENTAL
TIle developmcnt of this pun Master Plan shall be subject to and governed by thc following
conditions:
A. . Bnvironmel1ta1 permitting shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental
Resource Pennit Rulcs and be subject to review and approval by Current Planning
Environmental Staff. Removal of exotic vegetation shall not be the sole means of
mitigation for impacts to Collier County jurisdictional wetlands.
B. All conservation areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation tracts or
easements on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat with protective
covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Buffers and setbacks
shall be in accordance with 3.2.8.4.7.3. of the Collier County Land Development Code.
C. Buffers around preserved jurisdictional wetlands shall be in accordance with the State of
Florida Enviromncntal Resource Pcrmit Rules. Preserved jurisdictional wetlands and
surrounding buffcrs shall be incorporated in Conservation Areas which shall be platted.
D. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic-free) plan for the site,
with emphasis on thc conservation/preservations areaS, shall be submitted to Current
Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/constrUction
plan approval.
E. Petitioner shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of thc U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlifc Conservation Commission
(FFWCC) regarding potential impacts to protected wildlife specics. Where protected
species are observed on site, a Habitat Management Plan for those protected species shall
be submitted to Planning Services Section staff for review and approval prior to final site
plan/construction plan approval. A Bald Eagle Management Plan and a Gopher Tortoise
Management Plan are required for this site.
F. Any amendment to the Bald Eagle Management Plan shall require review of the
Environmental Advisory Council or any successor body.
6.10 ENGINEERING
A. Detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to Engineering
Review Services for review. No constroction permits shall be issued unless and until
approval of the proposed constroction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted
by the Engineering Review Services.
B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with all
applicable provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code.
6.7
------,.----.- ~-
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 77 of 133
C. The Developer. its successors and assigns. shall be required to satisfy the requirements of
aU applicable County ordinances or codes in effect prior to or concurrent with any
subsequent development order relating to this site, including Site Development Plans and
any other application that will result in the issuance of a final or local development order.
6.11 WATER MANAGEMENT
A. An excavation permit shall be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with
Division 3.5 of the Land Development Code and South Florida Water Management
District Rules.
6.12 mSTORlCAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL
Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1. of the Land Development Code, if, during the course of site
clearing, excavation or other construction activity a historic or archaeological artifact is found,
all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately
stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted.
6.13. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Accessory structures shall be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of
the principal structure except that temporary sales buildings. trailers, marketing facilities.
contractors storage and office facilities and the like, may be erected and utilized during the period
of Project development and marketing. Such temporary buildings shall be removed upon
completion of the marketing or construction activity which they are accessory to.
6.8
.---:-.. .. . .~---
Agenda Item No.. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 78 of 133
6.14 SIGNS
1. Qeneral
A. All County sign regulations sball apply unless such regulations are in conflict with
the conditions set forth in this Section. .
B. For the purpose of this pun Document/Ordinance, ~h platted parcel shall be
considered a separate parcel of land and shall be entitled to signs as permitted
herein.
C. Should any of the signs be requested to be placed within the public rights-of-way.
a right-of-way pennit must be applied for and approved.
D. All signs shall be located so as not to cause sight distance problems.
2. Entrance Si ens
A. Two (2) signs with a maximum area of 40 square feet each or one (1) sign with a
maximum area of 100 square feet shall be permitted at eacb entrance to the
Development.
B. EntraDCC signs shall not exceed a height of fifteen (1 S) feet above the lowest
centerline grade of the nearest public or private right-of-way to the upPennost
portion of the sign structure.
C. Entrance signs may be lighted provided all lights are shielded in a manner which
prevents direct glare into the vision of drivers using the adjacent streets or going
into adjacent residences. .
3. Project Sins
A. Project signs. designed to promote the cOcohatchee Bay Project. or any major use
within the Project shall be permitted along the east ~ide of CR 901. the north side
. of CR 888, the south side of Livingston Road Extension and on all land traCts
. within the Cocohatchee Bay PUD limits subject to the following conditions:
1) Project signs shall not exceed a height of twenty (20) feet above the
finished ground level of the sign site nor may the overall area of the sign
face exceed one hundred (100) square feet.
-
2) A maximum of four (4) project signs shall be pennitted. Two (2) signs
shall be located along the CR 901 frontage, one (1) shall be located along
the Livingston Road Extension frontage. and one (1) shall be located along
the CR 888 frontage.
6.9
3)
Agenda Item No. 8B
. May 10, 2005
Pafje 79 of 133
Project signs may be lighted provided all lights are shielded in a manner
which prevents direct glare which would impact the vision of drivers using
the adjacent streets or going into adjacent residences.
6.15 LANDSCAPING FOR OFF-STREET PARKING AREAS
All landscaping for off-street parking areas shall be in accordance with the Division 2.4 of the
Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application.
6.16 PROVISION FOR OFF-SITE REMOVAL OF EARTHEN MATERIAL
The excavation of earthen materiaI and its stockpiling in preparation of water management
facilities or other water bodies is hereby pcnnitted subject to applicable sections of the Land
Development Code. If it is demonstrated that fill activities on those buildable portions of the
Project site are such that there is a swplus of earthen materi~ then its off-site disposal is also
hereby pennitted subject to the following conditions:
A. Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a "development
excavation" pursuant to Division 3.5 of the Land Development Code whereby
off-site removal shall be limited to ten percent (to a maximum of 20,000 cubic
yards) of the total volume excavated unless a commercial excavation pennit is
received.
B. All other provisions of said Division 3.5 are applicable.
6.10
''''M~lIWi''._II>Ilo").'''''''~I>''''"h..",i''"""."..,;"."""C
I
Z[:JI G)@ CD CD
~!
~ II j ; ~~ ~m
~ ~ I
~8 ~ ~i.
"'1
)" ~~
~ y
g " ,... ~
~ I r ~
'-J i
n;
,... i
~
j ~
q
EXHIBIT
I
II"
II-
I-I
III
........:.:.:.:.:::::::.:..
. ............."...................
. . ......................,.................
. ....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::.:::::::::::::::::::::::.
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...:............. . .......... .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1::::::::::::-.
I, ......:...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
:.:.:.:...:..... ....,...................".".......".......
.:.:.:.:':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::::::::~:::::::::::::::"
....................... . .... '1' . . . . . . .
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .-:r:' :':'::::' ::::::::::::::::~
...................... .-..,,- ...... .. . . . . . .
:::::::::::::::::::::::...: ..:::::::::: ::::::::::::::::
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... .....11..... .11...
-.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. .... ..... ............ ......
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .:~. .':.:.:.:.:':.:..
:....................:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:... .. ..
...... .........:.:... ........ ...............
:::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .:::.:::::::.
............................... ... . .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::..
.:.:-:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. ...... .........
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.. ,... ...........
I
J1A II
:I~*
.U '"
COCOBA.Tu:1J!;:E BAY
PUD MASTER PIAN
(FIJTUBE CONDmO
,\", f ~I !l~)
VANASSE & DA.YLOR
-- -...... -.
----
............ .. --
lM7E': 0lJ-2tJ-D(J
R~ ,,-<J6-DO
SCALE: No r.s
PROJECT NO.: 80205
AotD NO. B0205-PUDJ"I.
gDI
~ !e~;g j
~ Cl. ~
a t5~. ~
)0.
~
G"@
q\
\W
~~
~
. :0
~I
::II.
fH~
~
~
i5
f1j
~s ~i$!
a~ ....~
~B ~!
.g~ ~
fr\
" :;:;
I i
"l !
~
~
I
w
fil
~
'"
..
.....41.....
........ ............ .......
.. .. ....:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::.
. .................................... ..........
.........................'.............................
.........................................,............
:.::: ::: ::::::::: ::: :::: ::::: :::::::: ::: ' :::::: z:: ::: 'oil
.:............... ........................ ...............
.. ......... .,.......................... ..............
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::=::::::~:::::::::::::::.
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. ... ..:.:.:.:.-: .. :.:.:.:I:":.:.:~
..:..:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.: .~: .:.:.:.: .:.:.:.:.:.:.:::
. .......,............ ~., ......... .............. .
.'. . . . . . . , .. . . . . . . .. . . . - . - . .
-:.:.:.:.:.:.:::.:.:.:.:.::.:::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::.
- ......... '. ........... . . .. . I . . . . . .. . . . ..
:.........:.. :.:.......:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. :.:.:.:.:.=.:.:.~
.:.:.:.:.:.:.....:.:.:................................'.
...... ........:.:.:.:.:.: .:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .
::::=:::::::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: '
:':':':':':.:':':':-:':-::::::::::::.::::'
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::....
.......................... . . " . .. .
::::::::::::::::::: :::::::.:.:.:.:.:.:
\
)l
I
~~~
.~r.t
~b~
~~i
~ii:ii
~~~
;:Q-"~
~I:g
Ito~~
~~~
R~Q
I
II'i
.1.
cscsl
PI
....__....:..._J
I
I
I
I
EXH/B/ T
liB}}
COCORAn :HII~II: BAY
PUD MASTER PIAN
WITB FAGLE ZONE 0
~\ ~ f. l_-)
VANASSE A DAYLOR
,..,. - ....... -.
-..-
__ft_
04JE: 08-29-00
Ra!- 1 1 -D8-00
SCALE: N. r.s.
--r--_.'
May 10, 2005
Page 81 of 133
J-*z
~ ~
PROJECr NO.: 80205
A04D NO. ao205-PUOUp.
Agenda Item No; 8B
May 10, 2005
Bllld Bag16 HqbbDt ~.~gp~
COCOHATCHEE
Sections 8,16,17, &20, Township 48 S, Range 25 E. CoUier County.
Turrell & Associates. loe. August 2000
4.0 Bald Eagle (HallsHtus leucocephalus leucocephalus)
4.1 Occurrence on Site
An active bald eagle nest is located on the site on the west side of
Vanderbilt Drive, shown on the attached site plan I preserve map.
According to FFWCC records, the site has been active for at least the last
7 years with nest being constructed in two different vees. The current nest
was constructed In 1995 and the original nest tree was cut down in 1997,
the nest had already fallen. The parent birds fledged one hatchling in
1998-99 and two young during the survey period. The nest is located in a .
dead and rapidly deteriorating Slash Pine tree on the western portion of
the property. The tree Is located between a small sawgrass marsh area
and the bay forest I mangrove swamp. The birds have an open view to the
water over the tops of the mangroves to. the west. Almost all of the
established vees between the nest tree and Vanderbilt Drive have died,
mostly due to a fire that occurred on the property several years ago so the
birds also have a relatively unobstructed view of Vanderbilt Drive. Due to
the condition of the tree, It is not expected that the eagles will continue to
use the nest more than a couple of more years at the most. It is more
likely that a storm with heavy winds will either des1roy the tree supporting
the nest, or destroy the nest itself. It is not clear where the eagles will try
to construct a new nest If this occurs. Specific observations were made
during the past two nesting seasons to note flight patterns and feeding
behavior around the nest. Th~e observations showed that flights into and
out of the nest were predominately to the south and south-west from the
nest tree. Several other dead pines around the nest served as perches for
the parents during the nesting season. An effort was made by the parent
birds to construct a new nest adjacent to the existing marina early In the
'99-'00 season, however, these efforts were unsuccessful.
2.2 Biology and Habitat Requirements
The bald eagle is the largest raptor that breeds on the peninsula of.
Florida, with a wingspan of about seven feet. Body plumage is dark
brown with the head and tall a distinctive while. Juveniles are brown-black
and fully develop the white head and tail by the age of fIVe or six.
Eagles typically nest close to water with their diet comprised mainly of fish
but supplemented with a variety of vertebrates including birds and turtles.
Thus nests must provide prey opportunities in the vicinity, good visibility
and a clear fiight path.
Nest laying begins in early fall and the cone shaped nests can be 6 feet
1
I "
. Agenda Item No; 8B
BlIIdEDgle HabJIDt ~
Sections 8, 16, 17, & 20, Township 48 S, Range 25 E, Collier County.
Turrell & Associates, Inc. August 2000
across and 6-8 feet deep, lined with soft materials. Most commonly, living
pine or cypress trees are chosen where some canopy remains above the
nest. The ratio of water to land edge is one of the most important
considerations and so long as prey density does not diminish, habitat
suitability of an area remains constant.
Egg laying peaks in early December and clutches usually consist of one to
two eggs with incubation of approximately 35 days. The young fledge
after 10-12 weeks although parental care may continue a further 4 to 6
weeks after this. Most of Aorlda's eagle pairs are year round residents
while the young are migratory.
In addition to the nesting tree. diurnal perch sites are. an important part. of
the eagle's territory. when. during the non-nesting season. perching may
take up 74-83% of the day (FWS). Selection is similarly based on how
much prey is available in the vicinity and how well the bird can see it. thus
perch sites are typically trees bordered by an open area such as river or
lake banks.
As a top predator eagles are vulnerable to the build up of contaminants in
the food chain. Population size was severely affected by the use of the
pesticide DOT (now banned). which reduced reproductive success by
thinning eggshells. lead and mercury poisoning are on-going concerns.
Multiple disturbances by humans of nesting birds has been shown to lead
ultimately to nest abandonment. Spatial and temporal Isolation from the
nest site and feeding areas are components of species management
plans.
Given the general requirements for the ecological. success of the eagle.
an overview of how development on the project site will allow continued
habitation is provided below.
4.3 Site Development Considerations and Species Management
Protocol
The current site plan calls for development of a golf course only with an
option to conduct future residential construction should the site conditions
or management techniques change to allow It It should be noted that
existing flight paths are predominantly to the south and south-west and a
far greater area of preserve extends from the nest tree to the west,
keeping the site in a similar configuration to how It Is currently utilized by
the birds. The main foraging area is the Wiggins Pass estuarine system
which is designated as Outstanding Florida Waters. 280 acres of whicf:1
will be deeded by conservation easement to the South Florida Water
Management District preserving this habitat In perpetuity.
2
Agenda Item No: aB
May 10, 2005
Bald Bag" HabillZl M~~Jktg~
. . COCOHA TCHEE
Sections 8, 16, 17, & 20, Township 48 S, Range 25 E, CoHler County.
Turrell & Associates, Inc. August 2000
The Habitat Management Guidelines outlined in the Recovery Plan for the
Southeastern States Bald Eagle can for a primary protection zone, except
under unusual circumstances. extending 750 to 1500 feet outward from
the nest tree. The precise distance being dependent upon the proximal
and spatial configuration of critical elements such as the nest tree, feeding
area, and roost trees. No residential. commercial. or industrial
development, logging or mining should occur within this zone.
The site plan for the golf course as proposed projects Into the 750 foot
primary zone to the east of the nest tree. It Is not anticipated that this will
adversely affect the eagles because of the existing circumstances of the
site. There are no existing living trees within this area and the birds
currently have a relatively unobstructed view of Vanderbilt Drive. The golf
course would remove some of the dead snags left In the area but
observations over the past two years have shown that these snags are not
utilized by the birds for roosting or perching. Also. flight paths into and out
of the nesting area were In the opposite direction and not over the area
proposed to be impacted. A screen of living vegetation will be planted
between the golf course and the nest site to block views and sounds of
the golfers from the nesl This aCtion would result in a buffer of
approximately 530 feet to the east of the nest A buffer of 750' would be
maintained to the south and north of the nest, and no Impacts are
proposed to the west between the tree and the Gulf of Mexico.
To minimize disturbance during the important nesting period, a greater
buffer zone of 1500' In radius will be established and maintained during
site construction activities. No construction activities wm take place within
the 1500-foot zone during the nesting period which runs from October 1
through May 15.
IncorpQrated throughout the site is an education plan consisting of signs
and posters located at golf hole tees. with information and pictures of the
habitats and species located in the vicinity of each hole. In this way
players and residents will gain knowledge and an appreciation of the
system as they progress through the course. The eagle will be highlighted
at the appropriate location with details on the species biology. ecology
and conservation status.
3
"- ~- -~_..- ._-- --.--
,
,.
tIt', .,..:. "9
Agenda Item No.. 88
May 10, 2005
Decemb.ti~ tdlb
that individual who has ownership or control of the property.
Also just as a note as to ungated properties, most' of the
applicants, as far as I'm aware, when they submit their
applications are required to allow, If youwllI,-:Staff and other
representatives onto the property. .
So I think that there Is authority for you to enter. . .lust that
when It's gated, you need to get permission.
MR.fiILL; Okay, thank you.
CHAIR...AN SANSBURY: Anyone from the pUblic Who would
like to address this partIcular Item? Hearing none, what's the
pleasure of the council?
MR. C~RLSON: Vote to approve.
CHAIRMAN SANSBU'RY: Do I hear a second?
MR. COE: Second.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Moved and seconded. In favor?
Opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing none, it passes
unanI1l101l$.I.,;,;......
'Ok.-y~~Mr;r{Nino.
MR. NINO: We need to swear people In.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Anyone that's going to testify
needs to be sworn In.
(Speakers sworn.)
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Disclosure on council? Anyone had
any conversations with the petitioner and the public regarding
this item? Hea.ring none, proceed.
. M.R.NINO: Ron Nino, Planning Services Department. Letme
start off by first asking you to make certain corrections to your
report.
We're deallrQI with 590 unlts,a project containing 590 units
instead of 799, and consequently, a dwelling unit density of 1.1
units per acre. Instead of 1.5, as Indicated In your report.
It's important for you to appreciate that we're dealing with a
parcel of land' that is currently zoned to penn it more units, while
the applicant alleges that they could put 1,700 units of housing
on this property, and with the underlying zoning being
slngle-famlly, that's highly unlikely given the environmental
sensitivities of the property.
But I can assure that they can certainly build considerably
Page 11
~
-.
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
DecembW i~ <lOlrO
more than 590 dwelling units on this property under the current
zoning that's in place. So therefore, this - in reality, tfie
development of this land can go forward under the current zoning
and result in sUbstantially, In the opinion Of staff,f~.rgrepter
impact to the area than Is currently proposed by this petition.
This petition is consistent with the Future Land Use Element
of the Growth Management Plan. As you know, the Future Land
Use Element doesn't have any preference for any
structure-specific type of housing. It simply allows In the urban
residential.distrlct anything from slngle-famUyto multl-taWlllyand
all of the descriptions that the people In the real estate business
use to describe various forms of multi-family housing.
Neither does the Growth Management Plan/Future Land Use
Element indicate any bias for heights of buildings. Andreany,
when it comes right down to the function of this PUD, is to take
the opportunity to develop high-rise structures In a very limited
portion of this PUD.
You're going to find, I think the staff report points out, that
90 percent of the land will be reserved, preserved, as some form
of open space, either in Its natural preservation state or as open
space that we associate with a golf course.
In reality, only about 10 percent of this land will be used for
housing. That housing will occur some 8 to 900 feet west of
Vanderbilt Drive and a small portion of hOllsln.g - I'm going to go
to the visual -- this property ownership extends to the Tamlaml
Traitor U.S. 41, and on the Master Plan is indicated asa
residential parcel.
So you. have residential parcels here and residential parcels
in this configuration here, and the rest of the land Is shOWn as
golf course t:ind open space.
In this port I 011 of the PUD, the provision Is made for
two-story residential structures.
In this portion, to the west of Vanderbilt,provlslon is Made
for high-rise structures of 20 stories in height, with the first
building being limited to 15 stories because of thefac:t that
Immediately north of that property is a 15-story high rise
structure under construction. South of that 15 stories, the
remainder will be 20-story structures.
Staff advised us that this petition, as presented, Is
consistent with all of the environmental policies and objectives
.
Page 12
..
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
D.ce...~if i~ idbb
of the Growth Management Plan and It Is indeed consistent with
the Traffic Element and all other related elements.
As you know, It.s an 18-hole golf course with 15 holes of golf
on the east side of Vanderbilt, three holes of 80lf on the west
side, 590 units, 90 percent preservation. '.
I would ask the environmental staff to deal with the
specifics of those environmental Issues.
MS. BURGI!SON:Barbara. Burgeson wtthPlannlng Services.
The proposed Coeoh.tchee PUDencompasses 530 acres of land
in northern Collier County, on the west side of U.S. 41, located
east and west of Vanderbilt Drive, Immediately north of the
intersection of Wiggins Pass Road and Vanderbilt Drive.
The westem parcel of land consists of a large strand of
mangroves, swamp and open water, as well as a diverse
collection of vegetation communities, such as bayhead,coastal
scrub and pine fJatwoods.
The eastem parcells undeveloped and consists mostly of a
vegetative community of cypress swamp, wet prairie, coastal
scrult~,..~~~~.P'!!!"'!tw9.~~. . ..... ._...>_.,........" .. .~.'ci,~"'.t~,;:.:~;,.:'.,.,,:o,:.: ""... ,...<.:;, .'.
. . ~fle-.iiili ..~,"j.. 'slt.'c6nsi.ts' .of"'66:8.'......".-;;' f,"""18" ." "";.~2acre.
of...",.iih."". 'f.4.,"oS'~' ";~oo'a(:r"'Ototh.~'s'~J:lia..i" .. ~st of the
."". .. ..... . . .' . .
uplands represent remnants of coastal dune strands. That
habitat Is dominated by pine and typical scrub vegetation.
Of the entire site, 19 - nearly 20 acres of uplands, 214 acres
of mixed wetlands, and 98 acres..of wate~~JI bs '~".!~!".>" ." .-
..:' . . :;>c.,> , .,'!~..~I.'.~~t!J!!!p... -p .' 8;," ,., . "CI.:
Wi h-'i;tli.'~ .".. I.'st' ."
. ',.', ~,""..~;Jt~
~f......"...~....e.'~P-?\';'ii'!~,.t.:.'.~..~~]:).pt....;,;i.~.~~.'..o~.~~.,..,..ili.~.~.!.l.....~T$..;i...~..'.i~;;Na.:J
DUm , ~k'ws.din.lfied..,.oIEth' s.::"" .
. "'" """i~"" ..,""'u-!'fl. ., -....;.:; "'". '.." '_', ,.y.""?...;,,, '.. -",.., .,JIJ.".",. " ,,,,J'Ii. ""..,;y>," '.
T ..',; .,. .. . ell ,of rj.lder"tliU~b'1I1IC1m"sfl.t()Urid':,. ..';.<......
' ...nes~~ii'l~~~I(i~i, . .~66rc1inlit.&.wltht~e'.-,I,.-rb~;~i;./.nc~~;
Ati.I'.11~.~~Ii~;..lfoP6..Ct re.ld~ntiaIPlans~i~d~ittt.t ' .
Page 13
.,
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
D.c.m6.1~2tidb
~i"t,,"
I?,.~'!r
win 'be'"
06_
II c ">"FK;~!;;'!;"-7,ij~f!
.ve~Y!!r,U~~",.".,...
Ii c' ,'-"""'""":
~i~.c~C;ri ~h81;,:: '.'~ '. .'be"l:on~ldereil aill"~,thif . "ij ciJulci"'be
cc'-ns@it_~';fj~;I,i'!"~2.".Il,~9".'d~ '-_:~,~.,- ...., '.' .,'..,." .....
'86"'" 'M" ;,,",'. '.~,I1"""o""Ncl';for;reslcf.ntlalunltior,id.i/I' 'm.it<wlthln
theprilt. . .' ,:"i.~,.~"\~gnej.'t:o'it'"Bi:pf'.fft&.1ilgi;'
reloc!JJifi;,;~:d "... ....-.,.
-1_1. -
..... ."...... .' ~ ~.. ~ I .. J
~:~~~~:SB,~'f~;!7:~If';it_~M 'r~ s~_
t"'-".~..lil"'''i-C ",. '.~ The consultant dldenslve"r
:~:ilf!iC'tq'~\iii'$e;!surv.y;o'n'ihe property, .14entlfled atotalof;'~33
bulTOWiJ$'ST.h.""~I' ..""".'~.'.-;"".'."".'.'. 'O...'.'I"k..'.. . '.......'d.....th. ......'.'..'1...'(...'. '..'e. '.:'."lanJ. or the 01' cour.e a
lI~mb~r 9f]"n~lI,s. n~~if1e'" orl"lnlll'site"'pfan'was .des.8 . .~, ,a"~
thi' ..arelaj"ln:'~lb.milodQOf:th.o""hirrc,' .. ""ow.
. '::r-."~'/Yt" :"'~';".'~'("." -,' ..'.'........ ~':'.: .;."r.,;':'!'1i.'.-" . '-.'.--'~. "I!.'.c""~"'';''i..t~!P;.,.....:..;<.,".,.".\I. .::.\....,..'!...1.~: of. '. >.,.":,.;,..'It.J)f,-,.%...",..",.',,,' :~,,~;,_IJ"_"""':"'j~;.D.'..'.;'4'1f"jI~ii;;;:'1i:;.1&.lIli....... -.. . '--.'...~.;~.~~:f..',:,.__:...;.
tha:ar'o:.c,tfft~"reas:fJ.bat ell ....e.'''''iie^..~.'~. af .. 'R" "'din
thept4;~iiCijj;'liii.'i~riipjat..':,.~.iA~fij;:it;' -';1Ii".
There Is also going to be some opportunity througl!.J!\t
deYelop~e~tpr:o~~,'~ ~o ~m,n" tlll~t a I'~I.~ .~~~m~r:!"I.~::ftfi~:
relocate some\of"ttie"r..iririare.t. .anath.:~'. ...... ",,"aN.i.-to
''''r..itY~tlle.ri..si.cC;.''''''o h.r .todOI.e.lJ~ri.~"I.>ih;i~'
P"""'" . "c' '...."<..,..:"-~",.;..::,...,:'...+i'......,,.... .... II ..P ..,...., ..... . ,.,..."'>;,,' . " . .' ...... ,.. ... ,..",
exl.tlnglocatlc:)",~":and the remainder of those will be relocated
I
l_
Page 14
"
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10. 2005
Decemlf,~ee;9fbiO
on.~I!~~ ...."W~"~_Il~~ilmf(:lpateanytortC)lsesWiII.neecl.tobi.'
relocatect"off...i~.~; '.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Questions?
MR. COE: Do you happen to know - I'm sure y~u would
know - Is the golf course considered a conservation area?
MS. BURGESON: Golf course Itself would not be.
MR. COE: We're saying that 90 percent includes the golf
course? What Is It if we subtract the golf course and all those
recreation areas and all that business and have actually what is
preserved tbat Is natural land. Does anybody have that statistic?
MR. NINO: I don't have that number.
MR. CaE: I have the 90 percent, but I don't know what the
real perC:,!'!"!)!'L .....
MS.. {SISHOP:Karen Bishop, agent for the owner. As of this
moment, we don't have those exact calculations. We have
changed our golf course to deereaseimpact. It Is our intent to
save as much native vegetation as we can.
By the time we're finished - normally a golf course Is
somewhere In the 130-acre range. Sometimes that includes
lakes and that Includes the rough.
The way that we have redesigned this course, we have
lowered all the grades. It will be something like a Collier's
Reserve course where we are Intending to save as much as we
can.
So those final numbers really won't be available until we are
finished the permitting through South Florida Water and the Corp.
Buttbey will be significantly lower than Wb__t,J1l~ COJ,lrses ,
'. "', ::,-;_.~~",I"'~"~'~.'1"~~~":..ii,'c:,';::.}'" ,:',,-","'':.'',, :-"-e" : '-'~:'" :"_"_ ',,:: '~':7
would be, which would be 139 .1l~.rel!.:i.YZi".;il~;W~;..r,bably
'''II'.'b.' """'.'" "'."'t. "....1' '. ""t'" '.. ".' .'.h.... "t' "_C..:'..'.'.,, "'",:,,~.';.L;.." -." '.'-:;'\~"'... ._.'.;I..I..""..ii...'"....'./::...i.._~...;. .-:. '..,' ,,'
WI .\ - avea .....as ,'; '; a' cOIl,.e"ftnlClI-""INe;ina~lye .' .
.eait~tion'-l~~!i~.'"."..._".:.!;....lij'_'$t~te. '-. ,
MS. BURGESON: The Initial proposal through the
Environmental Impact Statement was 213 acres of mixed
wetlands being preserved and roughly 20 acres of uplands being
preserved, under what would be considered preservation or
conservation easements.
MR. COE: Okay.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Other questions?
MR. HILL: I have two brief ones. In the origlnalcomput~dion
of acreages, the 101 acres of other surface waters, is that
privately owned?
Page 15
f
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
DecembW 6~ ioOb
That's - what part of Vanderbilt Creek that's included in the
500- .,
MS. BURGESON: I think if you take a look at the plan up on
the opposite wall, the yellow line shows the property boundary,
and If I'm correct in assuming, .Karen, that everything in that was
privately owned, even the surface waters?
MS. BISHOP: Correct. As unusual as It Is, this Is similar to
the project that came before you before The Dunes, where the
ownership of this property, and It shows on the Collier tax maps
that Mrs. Dougherty (phonetic), who Is the original owner, in fact,
has ownership under the water.
MR. HILL: Then that comes Into the 90 percent, also, in
addition to the mangrove swamps that you mentioned, that staff
mentioned? . ...... . . . . .'. .... '.,. "<<
NI,S.,BISHOP: Yes, sir. Alltho"WPI~ ,'"CO".~Jlc)lI,'~";{A
conserv;Jtioneasement In perpetuity' foreVer,ltot to be touChed'"
by anyone.
MR. HILL: The other question, In laying out the golf course,
it seems to me that you've put most of the holes in the wetlands,
wetland area, in the Jurisdictional wetland area as opposed to
the uplands. Was that an attempt to save the gopher tortoise
burrows?
MS. BISHOP: To be absolutely honest, It's very difficult to
try to save uplands and wetlands at the same time. So we have
Identified the most pristine of wetlands which we are,in fact,
saving. Some of the cypress out there are Just awesome, as well
as the gopher turtle habitat, which Is also an awesome habitat.
So between the two we are trying to find the least impacttve.
Unfortunately, there's a tremendous amount of water
coming from the north which we are Intending to keep the flow In
place, but It realry doesn't leave you much room to work with, to
keep that golf course because you need so much area for a golf
course Just to play In itself.
Unfortunately, we have had to encroach on some of the
wetlands, but with the mitigation we are proposing as well as the
conservation, we believe that this is the best plan we can come
up with.
MR. HILL: Are you talking about off-site mitigation?
MS. BISHOP: No, sir. We are going to try to keep everything
on-site. Of course, we are not finished our permitting yet so the
Page 16
II'
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Decemblite6: tooa
agencies may disagree and say I have to do off-site. But at this
time that is not our Intent.,
--... ... r -
I..,.., ___
· That's all, Mr. Chairman.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY; Other members of the council?
MR. CARLSON: I have Just a small question. Is this a
high-rise building over on the right-hand side, over on the eastem
edge? There.
MS. BISHOP: That's a golf club; that's the clubhouse Itself.
That's the only building, besides the maintenance facilities, that
will be in this whole area that you see here.
The finger will have some caddyshacks, the maintenance
facility, and two-story condos on the total east side across _
near 41.
But this area that you see here, the only place you'll see
buildings besides an occasional toilet will be the golf club Itself.
MR. CARLSON: So all the proposed residential 590 units are
on those little -
MS. BISHOP: Yes, sir, that's It. No other place. Well, we do
have the condos on the finger, so there will be some condos on
that side. But they are two-story and they are along that tlnger
strip itself. This whole area right here, as well as this, obviously,
will stay golf course and no buildings.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Where Is the eagle's nest?
MS. BISHOP: Right about here. There should be an exhibit
in your packet that shows the eagle's nest, his primary and his
secondary zones.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I got It right here, looking right at
it.
MR. CARLSON: I guess my biggest question when I looked
at these maps was there Is a bald eagle nest protection area
which coincides with the area of the future high-rises, and Ihat's
a big part of the project. And I don't have any Idea, other than
some taU buildings, what Is that going to look like?
MS. BISHOP: That side, the development of that side?
~~~ CARL!l9N: All buildings and parking?
.MS~\'~BlSHO.P:"fEssentlally, It will look very much like The
Dunes. You will have parking undemeath the buildings, and you
will have a high-rise building, and you will be vegetated around it,
Page 17
"",">O:Moo;'~~_';IiIjo"'''''\ii!...",i,,,,,",,,,,,,,,C''''''
r -
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
D.Cembi~e6; j~d6
MR. CARLSON: If a lot of that was native habitat that would
be Important.
MS. BISHOP: That area was burnt a long time ago, and If
you've driven by there, I'm sure many of you have seen this
eagle. You can see him from the road. There was a huge fire
that went through there. The kind of habitat that's available now
there is what's left over after a fire. All the big trees are gone.
There's only - the only pine trees that we have on our site
that's even remotely useable for the eagle Is a small patch at
this area and a small patch at this area near the marina. That's
where he actually hung out before. But at this point, he doesn't
go down there. He sits occasionally, because I assume he's
getting fed fro... the marina.
But at this point, there Is no vegetation there, other than
what's left over after a fire starting to come back stuff. You have
some scrub over there and you have- but you can see It's Just
mostly prairie looking stuff as you drive by there. And you can
get on the sltt!,too, there Is n.ofence.
MR. NINO: I'd like to a make a comment about the
statement that says this Is the least environmental response.
Again, I would reiterate that given the mitigation
environment that we live In, whether we like It or not, I'm sure
that this developer, the owner of this land, could destroy to a far
greater extent what's there If they built typical single-family
subdivisions.
You have driven up there and you have seen Glen Eden on
the Bay, for example. Glen Eden could be repeated over on this
1-
Page 18
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 93 of 133
December 6, 2000
property only at a much larger extent. That would put
impervious cover over 80 to 90 percent of the land wewre dealing
with.
So I don't know how you can say that this is the least
environmental response to this property. I beg to differ.
MR. CARLSON: I don't think that.s what Mr. Hili said. He
said this is some of the most environmentally sensitive property
that he's seen come before the board.
MR. NINO: Okay. Thank you.
MR. HILL: That was my comment.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I don't particularly like the Idea of
seeing five high-rise buildings, six high-rise, 15- to 20-story
buildings right up against the edge of the area with 25 foot
setbacks.
I think what Mr. Nino has to say is what's the alternative,
and the alternative, I think, in lieu of concentrating the density In
that particular area, is spreading It out over the whole site
MR. NINO: Let me advise you that we have used the same
development standards for spacing between buildings as we
have In Pelican Bay, which Is one-half of some of the heights.
And that's a pretty reasonable standard, provides for preserving
substantial view conidor.
The altemative to that Is - and to some extent there is some
multi-family zoning in this property that would allow 50 for the
pike. That would destroy the view because it would all be .
horizontal.
. ..."S. .,.~.m.l~..ke'",.":.".",,,'iiii6ij1"ailgn
ol".fr'; ,~...
~~M
'Wi.'iiiltf"
eo'j'~if;; I'll
.' ~~-~;;-::::' .~ ;-:"\;f';''' ;'.:-~
,;.y".~",,~.',<:,,:: .,..~., . ,.,:, I. "'" 'I; ,_ ""'" " ~((...;.,..,..,..t
I:ir~~~!2~L";, er" ounty. 'aoe Boso has. been:" ".;", >,,~f~r
theTrtA~N'~BlJllY: ~"" ".;,.,g"lJaiial~" itl1; :f
haIJ,1~~:,9t.~lf.i.~~D~H~aj~~~IY'do);t".y~~;f!;:1fi~~, "." . .... '~;~l~f, "_
c<ert~j"r~~~ii"ike';we~'cfa'nifor1hlrrr:ib;be;':hlovlr"'~'t~ . . libe.
Ms!!Vi(~'iJ'''f~,;''c;aIIY.dCiJ1:tliay~;.!''!':ladl!t~,>. ..
th.!re's.,~!m.,<!. -r~ils.......!!,. ." .'. 'th.... e. '...~,'...'.....~a. ~f.!!'. "!!l....'i~~I'!!!...g.. ..~,.]'c..~.;~.".' ".,~...."Jj...~"~.~~~t!!'n
. problem 'Irt',*hli' a'rea. . MoSt:6f the'eagles lrifiCOlliercCiUiitj'-liiive
Page 19
";~~"'"-""o;t.i""""i"''''""''''''_''"'';-M.''"'''"'''''"'';"'''_'''''
t- .,1 .
1-_
1_
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Decem6'iA:2b\i()
beenintheirrie$ts..lo"B IIs.tti.re is not- . . .
hfgh-~!f_~"""'~RY:$f)Pj)t.rltiijlY...h. tlldn't'....ve,the
MIL CARLSON: One last try at this. ~ had 'to guess the
area you've got designated as a bald eagle nest protection area
on this map, this map over here -
MS. BISHOP: Oh-
COMMISSIONER CARLSON: - how much of that Is Impacted
by high-rise buildings and parking lots and otherwise altered,
cleared under-
MS. BISHOP: Currently right now, there Is only one tree In
the eagle's habitat area; one tree that he sits in. There are no
other.
MR. CARLSON: 11m not Interested primarily in Just trees, 11m
interested in the native habitats that are in there.
MS. BISHOP: I have my biologist whols with me to give a
better explanation than I can on that. But substantially,
everything that would be in that area would be utilized for
development once the eagle Is gone.
MR. HALL: Tim Hall, Terrell and Associates. The actual
buildings themselves, the footprint of the buildings, Is about an
acre to an acre and a half, and then you've got the associated
parking and driveways and landscaping around them. Sol think
the eagle protection area is about 45 acres.
If you had five buildings at - maximize it, .say they took up
four acres apiece, then 20 acres of that 45 would be impacted by
the actual development. The rest of It could be maintained In
native or the existing habitat. Those are just guesstimates. It
would depend on the construction that needed to be done and
machinery that hWd to be brought In.
MR. HILL: On page 15 of the environmental Impact
statement, In this case the applicant Is proposing to modify the
primary zone to 500 feet. Thatls not consistent with this map, Is
it, on the eastern edge because of existing site conditions?
MR. HALL: On the original -- the map that you have or the
map thatls shown here, which shows the golf course hole number
four coming down, it Impacted the primary zone. It was within
the primary zone. And based on the flight paths of the eagle, the
flight paths showed from the tree it went generally to the west or
Page 20
\" -~
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Decem.,j-etf; i01dl)
southwest. So we had requested a modification of the primary
zone to 59Qf~.,t on ~hat eastem side... . . :.'
5incei.I!'~~I~.'",,~s s~~.itted, t~epl.~~~!:.~~~..Fllallged
andt"'el.~9 f99t:iP....roctry ~o~eJ' Jnal".,!in~~"~ll;~f!~)V~yaround
the nest. <)'here '.s 110 construction or gOlfcouri.;iimpact.
MR. HILL: The concentric circle Is accurate; the EI5
requirement is not?
MR. HALL: That's correct.
MR. HILL: On that same page, you refer to the gopher
tortoises will be removed from the construction area to on-site
preserve. You'll be applying for an Incidental take permit. Are
you going to reestablish those burrows on-site after the
construction?
MR. HALL: Yes. That's Just a safety precaution. The areas
that are going to be constructed with the golf course, the active
burrows and the tortoises that are using those need to be moved
from that area into the on-site preserves. Those on-site
preserves will be fenced temporarily until the construction
actMtles are over, and then the fences will be removed and the
gopher tortoises will then have free reign of the site once again.
MR. COE: We've got a member of the board that has a
preserve that remains fenced. I would assume you"e considered
both sides of the fence, so to speak, and you are recommending
unfenclng them, just let them go where they want?
MR. HALL: Right.
MR. COE: What's the impact on the gopher tortoise?
MR. HALL: The attempt was made In the construction of the
golf course - there are going to be areas, flyover areas, where
the only active construction activity Is going to be canopy
removal. The trees will be taken off and all of the native ground
covers will be lelr Intact.
So what we want to do Is - right now, the gopher tortoises
have access to that entire site. We'd like to maintain that to
where they still have the ability to move from one area to
another. That helps maintain a healthier population, rather than
just fencing them in the small preserve areas. Gives the ability
where If one area gets crowded or there's a conflict between the
tortoises, they have the ability to move to another area.
MR. COE: What about the pollution from the golf course and
effect on the tortoises?
Page 21
.M~~~lll;"''''im"''''i,;'',""",""""><l;"..;,"".",;",j.,,,..
p- ;,..;) ...
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
D.cemtfl~~~bijO
MR. HALL: That's something - there hasn't been a whole lot
of studies done on that. I would like to - we do want to have a
monitoring program of the tortoises. TheY-II all be marked as they
are captured and moved, so that we can try to keep.. observing
them to find out if that is going to be a problem.
The other thing Is that the golf course is going to be very -
the pesticides and Insecticides used on the golf course are going
to be very environmentally friendly. I'll let Don talk about that a
little more. '.. ". .
MR.i'::ORACE:.:1iMomlng. My name us Don Corace with
Signature Communities. We're the developer of Cocohatchee
Bay PUD as well as the Tensall Golf Club, which Is the golf
course component, obviously.
With regard to the golf course, our designer that we picked,
his name is Tom Weiskopf, and some of you who play golf
probably know that name. Tom Is noted In the golf course design
community as one of the more environmentally sensitive
designers.
He's done a number of courses out west, in Mexico, in the
northwest, where he had to deal with some of the same Issues
that we're dealing with here.
We have had - our objective with the golf course Is to
maintain as much of the natural habitat as possible. We do that
for two reasons. One, the golfers like to see a more natural
environment as opposed to a contrived golf course where you
have waterfalls, for example, that look unnatural. Secondly, to
keep the golf course In a natural state also reduces our
maintenance costs.
In addition, we have had meetings and conversations with
the Audubon Signature Golf Course program and you may be
aware that the Aardubon program Is very well-known In this area.
Collier's Reserve was the first Audubon Signature course.
Holt Collier, which Is a course underdevelopment by the
Collier family, Is certainly part of the Audubon Signature
program, as well. I think they have gone to the gold program
which Is very expensive. We have had ongoing conversations
with them.
They took their consultants, took a look at our plan that we
currently have, which Is a rough - we're only In the rough grading
planning stage at this point - and we went through the various
L --- ---
Pag_ 22
;.:>
I., f
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
DecemiJril2tioo
criteria, and their comment was that you have an Audubon
course already. .,
And one of the things that they drew attention to was that
as we started developing the routing plan for the c~urse, we
tried the best we could to incorporate those preserve areas for
the gopher tortoise. And If you notice - this plan has changed
slightly from the time that this was done -but you would notice
on our current grading plan that many of the tee box areas are
very close on both sides of the tee box areas, which are
somewhat elevated. The preserves pinCh in close to those tee
box areas.
And the Audubon Signature program people said that that's
one of the things that they look for to maintain preserves for the
gopher tortoise or whatever species Is on any one of their
projects.
So we have done what we believe, at this point, is as much
as we could without our environmental permits to preserve this
area for the gopher tortoises, and we feel that it's a good mix
with our gCJlf,~~.",~~,!p~*1!18 plan. .iC."'''...,'""..,.>,:...... ,.. . .... .
SO'from:)iult:'itin8"c"'inl 'it's,a.Win~Wira;~Sft~:fMlon:arut .we'"
c~.I'.~.in:~.:'~6:~V;tt~~~~A~~t~.'.#~6<;~t.,,~~:,~ "";j:\c"tdm1~i~~j.,.
habitat andto1iiiServe'lho..'iI'reas.'that.we , . .....{'~:s~i!!1ti."...
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: One comment on that. I think, to
answer your question somewhat regarding whether they stay or
not, I think we found - and we monitor It -- that by a planting
program with the gopher apples and prickly pear cactus as a
food source, we find some places they are trying to get Inside
the fence.
And I think under your permit that you're going to get from
the state, there will be some requirements in a relocation are to
replant the food !rource. And I think that Is a really beneficial
thing to Improve; actually get the vines out, clean up the
underbrush, do the plantlngs. I think that.s what really helps
them out.
MR. HALL: Right. That will be part of the habitat
management plan for the gopher tortoises, would be to maintain
the native areas and plant, If necessary. Some of the -- there Is
already some pretty extensive areas of the gopher apple and saw
palmettos that will be maintained. But in areas that have been
Impacted through off-road vehicle use or that may be impacted
Page 23
""ili"~'~~';""'"""~""""""''''''''<-<'''''''''"'''''''''''''''I"'.,.,,_>>
I
I --
l_
.;;;
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10,2005
D.c.mbiYj~ foOb
temporarily by the construction activity, those will be replanted
and returned to a native status. "
MS. BURGESON: That has become a requirement of Collier
CountYs Gopher Tortoise Relocation Management f!lan, that they
do have to provide some discussion on restoration or
revegetation of those areas, If It's necessary.
MR. CORACE: One comment that I would like to make as far
as the fertilizer and pesticides. There are a number of organic
fertilizers and pesticides that are being used these days. Karen
had made the comment, or Tim had made the comment, that that
needs to be studied.
We have an agronomist who we have hired for this golf
course project and we plan on using as much of the organic
material,s as possible, which Is consistent with the Audubon
Signature program, as well.
MR. HILL: Mr. Chairman.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir.
MR. HILL: I realize the preparation of these documents Is
expensive, but that would have been very helpful if that had been
Included In the package, that particular -
MR. CORACE: What are you referring to?
MR. HILL: The map on the wall. It would have been very
helpful to have that In the EIS statement.
MR. CORACE: Okay.
MR. HILL: These are helpful, but they are very confusing or
can be confusing. That's very helpful.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Do we have anyfllrther questions
of petitioner?
'i"'I~.'GAL:'.~:I.; stlorfof.,'iIe'sta-,;"%' . ;'gOl,;..e.I' . aliire
',I,.,v""~,,..r.~.~, 0'11".',',::,,: .l~';:w~c.;..:,\r'!!c.r~;~:'.. !,'-, , '. :....c". '-(- .'::t.,,-<., ~~;"-,!~,,';"!I'"'~I;~,. ~:)~_' ~r...,..;.."... .....~-_"Of~,~i'~t...'.; '~.j~."..-.....:!t....',_..;-::;(If'::: ';:i."ll. :~':'~'~~>."'_:'.'~- . ': '-",~,~"; y..~ !',:..,.~~.......,":."..~..," ,
whatwe'J'eia .'. .' .. 'e~.,jtlll:an}ja''"'lc'';.ef~;'ro~ e' .",.nd
"i!~'1L. ~\'t;;i..~~~"A ",
J\I!~"Ir-t,@:.9n!,:,~~c!~.s to app.....~~~tf!.~~!!~.~nyourezCtne
prqpel'ty,you'lIrenot'fSiuing ~~y:bM~I"'J"iJ,"!D!iI*~~. .~.. rezoning Is
slmp~y a S~!t!m,!r:A~ :!~~t s~l!,,!'.:~ou~aiJ-;:"g.t,t.N9g!\fP!!m~e,.J!U
can.u.... ....0. urland;.-' "tb.,und..'r~ln'."..c)""."'hH' ","" """~""'''''.''''''..''.?zt,.~!.!."...~(, .:
" :. ".' ','~:f~!.'-"'i;~.".&. ....;.: . ,..:..,....~:~';.''ti'''w,~.'.<~"..... 'I;'i(.,.,-t'~."":-"~;"'''...'.'';''_''.''..''J.H-r.;.'''''il:~"".-.' ~_8... '.:'.,..,f.,.,. i"::~" ~,,,~" ". ':"'''.'.'.'';
Th8-.;~orialtl~"": .... "; ",acr"s~'f"ll:,of.. "8 '
thro.:"h:otti'i:ili.ilf",. .' .';-''''5'; ,:,;;8;1"'*': .'. '. "'^'*tI~.,;,..t
~nci.f!'VOLl;'i:.~~Gi.1~ tior\iil".uipo.l\"'.*t:r O'~d:{ .:.-
There are really two separate actions when it comes right
Page 24
/' .;;; <
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
D.cem'i~e6,9jb~o
do",nto it. '.~.Y~-~~'b!MJ_...t~c~'!I~,:",."l1qlllcl~'t~~.'Jtie
P~~J~~.n "~~~W'?c'''''~;;!!!!.'~~!!~,,'.'Y!~~~..'&!''-!!m~.tlcal~~'',~,.,ti~t
thaf.ailtornatlcaIlY,.flIIOW$.'th.m:to 'g' olna.na'Bo;:.What."e,':lftev,
""illf'c:~.~~"t.nt"wlth';:ith.::p.rlblii"'..usei}Of'ihiilpanlcu..'r'zl1iirig
distriCt. .
So It's not unusual to zone land not fully appreciating or
knowing the extent to which theY~r.$lC)'nllt9,."I>>. ~,~.'~tq.,~tiU~e
tha~ zonin,~la~!i.flf?c!tl~!I.. .!-!,.".,i~',t~;a~~@'J.~~iI~!~~ t!t~' .'
'.Fmlttill ". 'roci.,~.,,,.0'\ci,.d..thCl$e aret. .:';~,t~'Pi:J(sllndbalan'C.s
P.".. '" ..,...8 p. . .... "<'.,., ..".0....'" .;, rH.'.,........ . 'c'.".;,. ""~' . .' .~.t...,......,... ......" .,':1;.."."'.....
that'wehaY.:.:~Chec"" ;...,.:ti8liinces' ........ .': .u'JOiow' ar."oln..to
".n)"... "".' .' , ., ..,;;......;c.."O; .'","" ..1..'.....,. ',.. . J . "4"~;Y~' "~..~,."'.,~"'...........,..g .. g.
take"care .~flt+~')lIli '""'l."cnOl plitout;:~ .Ii_m....
MR.WHITE,':"!flll!8.~..Mr. fhail'l'll8n. Ith"c'k ~~~~IOC)k at~'
.sti..P. .ula..t.J..~ n. .s..... .o......,n.:,.,..,.PM.:..'...;...::.'~...... ~."~:: ......,..!~:,~:~.,;.,.;P(...::.' ""'~'h.:]E.~.....~. C_....'. .r<.......'....~:.f!a..,~..:.::.'..".. ::".~,I!u :.' ~.........cb... ....~...^.f.r.':.............'P~...: .'
i..'. '~I .,,~. tl ...~... ..I...~... .........;;O;....:r . ..... '1'1 ..h........ '" .,....,... ....... ......i4>b.. ........ .......,..
. sa';,... puta O".!:,.._....~ .. .~! '" ....~ ...' ...."",....."'ov..'.:~:.o,,.).i;:.,';;.
resjhntfil.~hl.?th:a;;;;' ~"tlofi'f!;ttlii:;"'irc.r~,,"I~.':'
~ " .,'-', :-".- ,'-. :', ---...:..-....,..;.... : ,g~,.,.-..t:~~~t;":--:".~,.,,,:,,'\...."",;,il'l...,;;;;.~~~,. _~~"",'..._:-t.,.. ".'i'r...~.l:c'.,...".. ',". ....,~,...~.._':,.;:.-:.......~.',.j;.<:......:P.\"..,
cU..rentlY'ac:th'e"bill."~!ge.ri!tsf.>;1 think that may also be
information that.s consistent with the question.
CH~"RM~N!~~~!,~fl:V:Okay. .>
,re 'u"l,;;:!~~~!~r~h ..... '~,~!2t"r.~I'..." .. . ..~.. ~~~~?::~:J:=tl~' ,
'bc!qa~~c......~o:th~~g'i.i.ai~Z."'as..~..~~ti~::~'io"that;~f etY
~1~. :!.'~.a1a.-."..~...~......it. . .'b.". '. f..... b...c.~iI~.~.~."''''.':c.~i..;iha...'.'.' .t.. .'th....e.. it.".;; .~.
pp" ...;c....,...,... .".' . .... '.. .
>'nct"...at,IIIIIs.lf,';!lq~. h."g~.." . , . b,lIttHt.;Ctlf.th.. ."Slt
llif6it.,~tIfal~- . \\~~::Z'..,,:":''''Jiii?~~,' .'
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Any further questions of the
staff or the petitioner? Anyone from the public that would Uketo
addr.ss this matter? .' Have you been swom, sir?
MR. T..HO~N!~~:','~'!t!J~~ sir. Good m~~~!~g',:~ouncll members.
My name IS ~hrl.!FhorntCtIl. '..II'I,an att~~J"~",re In ~~,p.IEt~. ",Vith
the lil~ ~rm i~f .:r~!ise.., Kc>>.bza ancl...Lleberfarb titp....I!~'~8th.p;
ES~I!.ry~on..rvatl.n~oclatloii~ formerly knoWn as the
Wiggins Pass Conservancy. It's a group of about 200 people In
the north Naples area. The mission of the group Is to protect the
waterways In the North Naples area and to protect estuarine
systems.
We do have a few concems about the project. Some of them
just might require some clarification from county staff or from
the developer. And first, before I get Into those, as noted by
Page 25
;""_iolWil~~"""_"""""""","",,,,,,,,,"'.",,,;,,;,",,,:,,,_;.,,,,;_,",.,-
I l~ ;:;
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Decenl':&i i,Ojb~6
1-
Councilman Hill, the first issue that Jumped out at me when I saw
the proposed plan was the statement In the document 'that about
100 acres of this property, claimed In fee simple title, Is open
waters of Wiggins Pass Channel, the Cocohatchee River and
open waters running north and south of the Wiggins Pass
Channel.
And it was a surprise to me to leam that when I go fishing
through the Wiggins Pass Channel, "m traveling across private
property when I understood that property to be owned by the
state as sovereign lands. Thatls an Issue I've requested a
determination from the state DIvision of State Lands, Title and
Records Section, and it's something that we'll continue to work
with the developer on to clarify. I'm not sure what we can do
about It today but the Issue should be clarified.
It goes to the density calculations, If you claim 100 acres of
It Is open water that's not counting the wetlands, the mangrove
wetlands, that are below the mean high water line. I don't know
how many wetlands below the mean high water line there are,
but If you do determine that those lands are, In fact, owned by
the state, It would change your perspective In how you look at
this project.
As you look at It now, you realize you are receiving a huge
amount of land as a preserve, but If the land Is already owned by
the sovereign state, you're really not getting anything you don't
already have.
So I think that's an Issue that needs further research, that
needs to be lookedinto.
The second issue that I'd like to address concems the eagle
and the eagle really - existence ofth. .agle on the site is a
consideration that you should make, and whether or not the
timing C)!t.~I!~!~~~!.r!guest I! ~pproprlate.. .
The'-Stalf,tiii'..tii8il:lnthelrt"r....itatlonthls'develoment
will n~ilb."'~b~i' le"a.;ioii' '....asth':~.,j'O'j.~I.~.bls'.th~'P6..~:.;
,.,,; . ......... ......P.... ,.,.,!!,~";,.;,j[",,,~!,';"" . " $I, ""'" ..... . . . .... ..... .." '..' .' ":'~' ,"0' ""'!" ";'''~''';,j,ji~... ........~..
apPr~yl,~IJ,.t~b~'~~~i.,~:!5:. ,~.ls,'~}fp"~:reaU~:'~~...r.~~',J"':~;f'l~Jlle IS
golnSl.t~I!~"'~'~';!~c!~~~~ahuge .fI"a~~_~tSJ",~~-:a"~,,to make sur.
the eagle does leave so the project may proceed.'
Second, by approving It now, you are locking In the
development rights on this property, and granted, the property is
zoned for development now, but you.re locking in a high-rise
development and it might not be the time to approve this
Page 26
..;:;
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Dece~ji ~1i~a
property for that right now because there's an eagle there.
If you don't approve It now, what you gain Is when the eagle
does leave and the eagle's been gone for five years and a
developer comes In from a project to be approved at that time,
the entire environmental regulatory scheme may have changed.
That eagle may be there for 10 or 15 years. We lose the
opportunity to apply the new regulatory scheme In the future to
this land.
So by approving It today, the eagle Is there and he'll leave
and when he does leave thep,"C)jec:twlll.goforwa~..
but~"['......;lI~t~~tJ~~~
20Y~,:;d()V!!!::~~,..:..... will beappliedtothls':".jecfafijtiftcan
beadisadvantage~:~Maybe the laws - the regulations might
swing the other way and be less environmentally sensitive. But
who's to say? We don't know. We do know If we approve It now
It will be locked in for this development.
The third Issue, and this Is probably Just a clarification from
county staff. I don't think It's perfectly clear from the code _
maybe it Is, maybe I missed something - but I want to clarify
that it Is the case that the county's policy and procedure Is to
count open water for density credits. I would like to know If
that's the case.
I know In the city of Naples they do not count open waters
for density purposes. I assume the county does, as this project
has been given density credits for all that open water. But I
think It's an issue that needs to be clarified.
Lastly, the land does have an Immense amount of preserve
area. That preserve area also has a list of permitted uses, uses
that are allowed In the preserve area. And I know that some of
the preserve areas are on the golf course and some of the
preserve areas are on the waterfront. I don't think that all of
these permitted uses are appropriate In all of the preserve areas.
The preserve areas in the golf course, especially at page 5.1
of the PUD document, section 5.3, permitted uses include golf
cart paths. Number 5 is pathways and bridges.
While those might be appropriate on the golf course, I don't
think they are appropriate on the preserve areas adjacent to the
water of the west side of Vanderbilt Drtve.
Page 27
,.- ~ t
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10,2005
DecemWr til,2fblio
And I would ask that, basically, the preserve areas be
segregated. And the preserve areas on the west side of
Vanderbilt Drive have extremely limited uses: A boardwalk might
be nice,an elevated boardwalk, but a large golf patti with a berm
would not be appropriate In that area. It would prevent water
flow.
And I Just ask those permitted uses be speciliedfor which
preserve area they apply to.
That"s the end of my presentation. lid be happy to answer
any questions If you have any.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Questions for Mr. Thornton?
MR. THORNTON: One further Issue I forgot to bring up. I
would like to place this map on the vlsuallzer,lf I might.
Environmentally sensitive lands In the county have already
been overlaid with an ST overlay. This Is the current zon.lng map
for a portion of the property. As you can see the overlay line -
we don't really know exactly where It Is. You have to go out and
. have an environmental person determine exactly where that line
lies.
But as we can see, It's presumed to run in this general
direction. I can't tell from the application where the delineation
between the development property and the preserve property
lies in relation to this line.
Special treatment lands that have been designated that
way, they have special requirements in the site development
planning process. The approval of PUD would remove the special
treatment overlay. If all those special treatment lands are being
preserved, that's great. That Issue Just needs to be clarified
where those lines are In relation to each other.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thank you, sir. Like to respond to
Mr. Thornton?
MR. THORNTON: Thank.you.
I'd
like to address two of the Issues that he brought up, one of
which Is the density Issue.
We've had discussions during our Dunes project with regard
....the waterways and including those In the density. Let me Just
say for the record that we've done a calculation as to how many
- we've done a calculation to those lands that we control that
are not either mangrove bay areas or the water areas here, and
Page 28
~,-:;:; ,
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
DecemlAii ii;3iObO
that calculation basically runs along this line to here, including
the golf course and this finger area that we've noted. We have
approximately in that area 230 acres.
Based upon our existing zoning we can have th,ee units to
the acre, and what that equates to Is 690 units Just for that
property alone that's allowable for the density qualification. So
whether or not we hold private land which we contend that these
areprlvate lands - even if you take those lands out, we still
qualify under the density formula for 690 units, and we're only
requesting 590. So In my mind, his contention as far as this
wate.-w.y Is moot.
--- - - --J- ___
1 -____ ~~ .--.
. --- ] l_ _'" .... LIr~
.--. -. -- _-If - . 1-. .~
I II ;iii. .' _. . . till'
--_.._- - -.. J - ---- -.:.Pi -L1l ~
,.
-
jl ~ . 111
-J __
-J
- I
-
r___
-
So I Just wanted to make that note.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thank you, sir.
How would you respond to Mr. Thornton's request regarding
the separation of the two preserve areas?
MR. CORACE: I'll let Karen address that.
MS. BISHOP: The way that we've set up our PUD allows - he
Is correct, I have preserves on both sides of the road. Thegolf
cart paths are intended to be at the golf cart area.
The preserves on the west side of the road along mangrove
areas are not Intended to have golf cart paths. We are In the
process at this point of permitting this with the district and the
Corp, and I can assure you that they would never allow a big
berm golf course path to run through the mangroves. We would
at the very most like to see a boardwalk for passive recreation,
but at this point, we haven't even proposed that in our
environmental permits.
We Intend to put a different kind of conservation easement
on the mangrove wetland preserves than we do on top of the
preserves within the golf course. So we do not Intend to put a
.
~
Page 29
~.'~~;Jtji;..,"".",OlliI;iI_:"""''''i>I;,",,',''''';.~i,_.,"_,';,,",_
t"> ...J ..
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10,2005
Decenft:~i ijl: :ib\Jo
1-
golf cart path back there. There would be no reason to do that.
The construction would be a nightmare considering that it's very
squishy out there in the big scheme. So that is not going to
happen.': "
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Do you have a problem stipulating
to that in your approval?
MS. BISHOP: No, sir.
MR. CARLSON= Can you address his question on the ST?
MS. BISHOP: Yes, to some degree. I've worked with lots of
projects that have had ST overlays. I can assure you these ST
overlays were done on 200 foot aerials, which are 200 foot scale
aerials, which, at the very best, have a quarter inch per foot
stretch across them and they are a generalized line.
These lines are determined more acc.urately with the
vegetation maps and the jurisdictional lines that are done by the
agencies which we, in fact, have and are going through that
process. There may be some change in those lines due to the
reality of the ground, not so much encroachment of our
development, but what's really out there.
You have the vegetation and flux maps,.you can see where
those lines would be. At this point, we have not submitted any
applications for any buildings at that point because there's an
eagle there and we're not Intending to do that. But during the
process of permitting there maybea change In those areas.
But I can assure you that those lines would certainly never
cross the mangroves or any of those types of areas that ""eknow
absolutely weire not going to be encroaching on that. But I can
tell you that the maps you see and Collier County zoning maps
are not the best accuracy. They give you an idea that there is
something there, but the shape of those lands is better
determined in the environmental process, which is what we're
doing now.
MR. NINO: Let me also add that we've used the PUD
rezoning process as a means of redefining those jurisdictional
areas, so this Is not precedent setting.
Pelican Bay.. a great many of the PUDs that we have
approved in this county had ST zoning on them and they were
redefined as a consequence of adopting the PUD. So we've done
this many times.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir.
Page 30
"
-r. ..:J II'
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Decerrl6ii- W; jO()O
MR. HILL: While you're up there, Mr. Nino, this Is a request
for rezoning?
MR. NINO: Yes, it is. ,'.,
MR..tnLL:. 1.8re.~lth yoursta,tf!II1~"t,.thatt"~~cloes;Jtot
nec!!!~!~!if;~,~~et~'.'!p:~lfI~IIy.What'.^'i~lnl.to' ~!'~!~!t. Would
it ~e.!p~r~p."~!! .f~~,;I~J~~~~c~:'.t~,~,k thrlt.,~~.,pr!J't~",lk!
~cIi".r.iJlC::'~tllf1..~G.lUtur. whe..th.
MR. NINO: I can't answer that question. Pat, do you want to
answer it?
MR. WHITE: ,,~.~Ink the .impl..nsW.rl.pro"iII~ly yes,lt
woU'db.llppropi1ii.~ but I think that-s only the result of what
the collegial body decides to do.
MR. NINO: EAC Is an advisory board. The Board of County
Commissioners Is the ultimate authority. I can't Imagine a case
coming back to an advisory board. It would have to go back to
the Board of~ounty Commissioners, wouldn't It?
MR.WH'TE: Mr. Nino, my comments were made with the
undel"!~atl1~lng. t,"at ~,!~i!~mClttes. r~c:91.!',~!>"dat~c;t~' ~"I)f. Their
tec:o.,..~~.Ij<<fal~o~'!co!!.lc:!iil]~"that.t..itYWoul"'i'q(e to'..!.@;'lb~Y..,. , .
b~lIevf!:jf'1O"be^~.PPr.ppiiatea$;~;:~Od" ~,\to 'h@,,-e.i~re~l.dtm~~d}at
stJ,~~c.t~I.:;polnf.,..., 'tl~~"~~.^tI!mf;.~~,form.:"~m assurrilngthat
would.bec.-nslstentwlthst.me'.as' '''ct.'Of a denial.
i~'~'J-;~";li:'~'-;"":'''''':-~''''-~~-:i':'':'',.',~: ~. - ,:",,\~lf'~~jli'~~I"~, <:'~"..~". 'U.., _ " ", pe
~~~.'RM~~'SANSBURY: What you'resaying,you'd IIketf)
~~.!.~i!~9,"mlt!~~, '~"!!!!t!'me,,~,~.~~J:~,,,.,tm~!!;~!!.,'~~~.~,!!l~ that the
~~jllf!!"'~.;~!p"rted and they are going to proceed 'with the
diYel#pm~? "
MR~;H.LL: Right. I think It's been made very clear that this
council Is being asked today to approve or disapprove a rezoning
which simply says you can now use the land for a specific
purpose.
With as many uncertainties as exist In what's going to
happen and the window when that's going to happen, I think It's
appropriate that we might want to look at It at a future date.
- .II.. -.f _ .~ :2..... ~
- ~I .i "-~ _ I I l~" ,,' '"
- - 'w i' "~, = r~ ~ - j ~ f
U .= - _~ 1L . 1 '. r~. A ' .....
-- -- - ---- - ~ _ J~
Page 31
"':i.lji;~\iliI~Iti.>"""'HY.~,"'~;:;"";""__''':''
.-.. .;..J II'
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
DecemiJ'ii fI;~'hIJ
And furthermore, during my environmental process at the
district as well as the Corps, Fish and Wildlife, and Game and
Fish, there will be a myriad of eyes looking at'ihis ft:om the
environmental perspective, so that It will not be left to the
haphazard approval of, you know,non-envlronmental people. So
you do have that security that that's going to happen.
tI- ~ - L
. ~.~.
. - . - -
r
..... l'
MS. BURGESON: I just wanted to make a comment
regarding what Karen just said. If the PUD document Is amended
in the future to amend the Bald Eagle Management Plan, that
does not necessarily mean staff would require that this project
or PUB docl.lment .tte brought back before the EAC.
'\", ': ..,:- ~- - , , ' ' ,'.' ',," ',' ...... " , ,-',' . ',.' , , ", --,',:', ,.- '.,-, ,.".{' ,":',":,,' ".' "","-:'-_:'""-:, ,,' --- :,,' ,~,.' '.
.~:"~!!lM~~SANSBURY= Could we requ..tStlplllatlq""9flb"t.
1..'tht!<~PP~!2l.I? . . .' ..... ..... .......,
,.M!~;;~!l!ti';'.~"~.;~I,:y~u~..~t'!',.~lp!!I'~~."'~.!l"!~"Q~'.,;; .'. ...,
amenilml!"ttc)"th. Bald.E8 . leManaem.ntPlanre "'ulre.tthittthls
.. . "~",',;';h"""';J',,' .... <,..... ..g g.. .. ...... . q..~-1:'"..,...".,."',...;.,.:.,,.
PUD.;".~;ti:rou9ht back before EAC, we can add somethlrigto that
nature~' .., '.;
MR.'COE::' I'd like to make a comment here and as you know,
11m pro environment.
But I see a developer that appears has taken an enormous
amount of time to preserve within the current regulations the
maximum amount, and hels tried to balance It between a decent
project.alld the environment. ..... ". .... ."
W.!rtfhun':j.I' ,ojj'thlj'a leanlti.", ;;')In
t'b' '.'f;gA"J\~'~> <,'.:.~: ..;~., ,~\.;,p" '.'I>'h""\"i"'>"'!'~'{.NI'i;:iIJ.,I'i:,PE'" '.:,",r:rilt."''''.'~~:''i';;'I'.'
o e'.:' . ;:eyes;on . ..eag' .~;: ve" ";gO
."." . . . . " ,.,:.:,,--~,,,.;,, """". ... .\.'..-".... :,,:,.,...,7___'j;;_:.~'~"'.' '.J. .:'."....'.ih.'" '.' ..J~:""''<'''''';'' '. .... ..... :',.;,;~,.'."".'. ';-; '. ,:~"~.., .,.,,!" __.:' .~<:.<:!t'.':,
ell]pS"Q;rWatch'~lo"if:~, . .,goln'. .,";ilCh', .:
itl" . ;j." "'i,:,~;~:~);~l!d',:I~'~;'.!t'l~_.... i'/~;~~~i\,i.i~~:'n~i~Jt\.';:<~",,!.',
'm.'.....:.linelsth.y...can.t;."....lng "nt. s'fe"ejm. ........
'>',~_'Jf~;:,-:' '__':,''"',,,,~. , , '" "', .;,>_..,'~",_c,,; ,,",,!,.-,,;"\
~1IV'.YitOd:" So to require them to stop planning everything' and
walt until the eagle fll(;ts a~'Y'."Judlcr~""',~,1:h,,)'l!e!~to get 0.,
w" ith t.h.......e...... I.r.... .....p.......I. .a...... !III. ~n... ..g. . .r.I.,. J....,x.;. p.". I(.J.n..o~..~~:;.':il.,..,.....ta..Jt. ..y,....'.;tc.......'..... ~.......lil. t"(!lO..f._....... ....n.........~.......... h.................i.. qg,,..nlif':IW.. ~
years~ffert~lssllck.jo'fll..way;;tihit~'i'a'lonlfil:l1lp~.,;' ,...... ~
In the meantime they could be planning their' project and
getting on with their lives. For us to put a stumbling block In the
middle of them when they're going to be required to be looked at
Page 32
- .
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
DecembW fi;7iOOi
by fish, game, wildlife, George Bush, Governor Bush, maybe even
AI Gore, Is ridiculous. That's my comment. .,
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I agree with you. But I think what
Mr. Hili is asking for Is not the rest of the project bu.~ Just the
area within the 750 feet.
MR. HILL: Unless some of the rest of the project gets
affected.
MR. COE: We have enough people looking at It without
having to come back to us. There Is enough people out there
that are going to have to permit It. Even the county staff knows
that they are dead meat If they Infringe upon the eagle's area.
So I mean, there Is people that are going to be really held to
task on this and to come back before us, we're Just another
stumbling block and waste of time when It comes to that. We
need to look at the overall project environmentally, look at what
it really does and what it doesn't do.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: What's the pleasure of the council?
We need to move forward.
MR. COE: I'd like to make a motionto.ppro".~t~!it.I$.'
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. . .
"~Il."1NHll'E:WC)uld that be with the stipulatlons-tlt.t the
staffhas".ii1 the.taff report?
MR. COE: Obviously, yes.
MR. WHITE: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I think the stipulations we talked
about, separating of the preserve areas and the language what
could be done In the preserve area.
MS. BURGESON: That's actually within the PUD document,
so we're comfortable with that.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay, very good. Do I hear a
second?
MR. HILL: To get a vote; I'll second It.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: We have a second. Discussion?
Hearing none, if we could ask you If you would call the roll on the
vote to make sure we get it right on the record, everybody knows
who's voting for what. Shall we do that?
MS. BURGESON: Normally you Just ask for those in favor.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Those In favor of the motion?
MR. COE: Aye.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Opposed?
Page 33
-~~_"",a""""""'t..."'"''''....""""."",,,^;,.,,,,
r....} ;.J .'
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10,2005
Dec.mlltit ~8ibbll
MR.CARLSON: No.
Mil. GAL: No.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Motion falls four to two. Four to
two against. '.
MR. NINO: It's important that the board have a habit of
asking why did you vote against It. I'd like to be able to ask the
question. Can I get some reason why you're voting against It?
Mil. WHITE: I don't know that Mr. Nino's comments are
premature. There may be a second motion that's going to come
from the council. I don' know. If there will be no further
motions, I think It's appropriate to address his question If you
choose to.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Are there any further motions?
What we did Is turned down a motion to approve. What we need
If therei.sanother ac.tl!n, we need anoth~ril11()'ic.".
unco~.~r~'f"'~J~1:Jr~~i::~~~Ir/~"~~
/"'~>:"','.~~'.:,_"',.':..,-:",;>.,.,'i",-,,~": ,,_ """", , ">~"';:"'~":~(;::'~>'~::':' :'.::' ,~.-.!..:,,~,:,,:~~';<j;':<;:' ,'_' ,"",., ';'.' """,j,:,~;,,'<:~""<'.:'\>'."_'-~":"""','~
protectio:n.~!lI..,lr!II!ly don'f'-know:what~..'g~inIlJct'''~ppen
ther,e. It'sabigpartof>thlsproJect, and 11m '..ncomfortable with
that.
I thought we were getting somewhere when we talked about
this project coming back to us so we would have more details on
specifically what would happen In this area, a huge chunk of this
project. And that's what I'm uncomfortable with and If we can
get some detail on that in the future, I'm happy.
CHAIRMANSANSBURY: Basically what we're saying Is 750
foot radius, which Is called the nesting radius or whatever It is.
MR. CARLSON: I'm talking about this whole area.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: The area where the high-rises are?
MR. CARLSON: It's designated on this as a Bald Eagle Nest
Protection Area. -
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Doesn't interfere with their ability
to build a golf course; Is that correct?
MR.c:~~~~9": . ....,.t.s co....ect.
CHAII,!~MA~.;~At(I".Y'8Y: T".y,couldl,l...II~..ag~ff~~"u~.,
proc~ed~t"E!y~~tling'el!;i~ 9n th~tba!SI..JI,~~'V.irt';~f1~r.~() the
time ~i~~ygqCt;~~l,tVith,the high-rises, we are.y.....b..ting.:thllt.they
come'back"fto':us.~ . .
MR. COE: The antithesis of that Is also, If we turn this down,
they can Just turn right around, go back, plan It, get rid of the golf
'.1
Page 34
......,) i,& ~
Agenda Item No. 8B
May '10, 2005
Decenlllw, 8l,92t1tJO
course, put in single-family homes, high-rises, whatever they
want to do and build out umpteen hundred more things and
destroy the environment where the golf course is currently
located.
To heck with high-rises, they can go for that later on; am I
correct, Mr. Developer?
MR. CORACE: .Im sorry, could you repeat that?
MR. COE: The bottom line Is you could just forget about the
golf course and go ahead and develop that area and come back
later and request the high-rise?
MR. CORACE: Yes, we would have the ability to do that.
MR. COE: Just want to make sure. understand that.
...-....-7. r.. ~- ~~l-~ l
.. . . ... :
~_= . jrr~,~ ~ ~~...~-1~~ .
_'Jk4 .... --. .... L /" ~
.' II. 1 ~ .._~II"'lIr-fll- -- -.::- I
--~4J .._
-- ~=]- .. . .IIr
CI:IAIRMAN SANSBURY: There seems to be a disagreement
with Barbara on that. Barbara, did you say they do not have to
back to the EAC?
MS. BURGESON: It's not a requirement from the staff level
to bring this project back to the EAC with that type of
amendment.
MR. NINO: It's rather academic. Within six months youlre
going to have a Hearing examiner process, you and the Planning
Commission will not be reviewing land use petitions.
MR. HILL: That's Incidental to our action today, though, Mr.
Nino.
- ~- ---,. Jr-
. -I. =.: -_-~ . - :-].1\.-. ~ ----..
MR. CARLSON: Move to~ove with the stipulation that
they come back to the EAC once they finalize the development
plan.
MS. SANTORO:, Second.
Page 35
~ .t", f
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
DeceniJM.8,o108O
his time the dlscus.lon, Mr. Chairman, given
the nature of the motion and specificity with regards to coming
back before this council, If as Mr. Nino has Indicated, there may
not be In existence at that point In time a cOII.ncll, Is perhaps a
favorable motion _r--1I1 -;I . -I--I'~ ~.W7 --
~ . __ __.__ .__ II ~_ I __._
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Do you have a problem with that
addition, sir?
MR. CARLSON: I guess It's the reality of life we have to deal
with.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Does the seconder have a problem?
MS. SANTORO: No.
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing none, all In favor of the
motion?
r I -- 1 I - __
(Recess taken from 10:30 to 10:40.)
(Speakers swom.)
CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Witnesses have been swom.
MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows, planning
advisory. I have an amendment to 1-75 Collier Boulevard
Commercial Center PUD Interchange, at the time of our
addressing the department to produce a similar sounding name
with the first project.
As you can see on the monitor, the site Is located on the
southwest quadrant of Collier Boulevard and Davis Boulevard.
It's surrounded by the Westport Commerce Center PUD to
the south. To the north Is the Alligator Alley PUD which allows
for commercial retail uses. To the east across Collier Boulevard
is the Forest Glen PUD which Is a mix of residential and
commercial.
In the northeast comer Is the Tollgate Commercial Plaza
PUD, and the project we heard earlier today, agenda Item A, is
the Collier Boulevard Mixed Use Commerce Center.
This project Is currently zoned industrial and allows a full
range of Industrial uses. Due to changing market conditions,
petltloner's requesting to rezone It for PUD allowing
approximately 148,975 square feet of commercial retail type
uses.
It's consistent with the activity center number 9 which
Page 36
Agendg~h1W !B
May 10, 2005
Page 111 of 133
BosiMichael
From: Mari Nelson [marimari@naples.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 11: 13 AM
To: BosiMichael
Cc: Doug Fee; Cece English; Jim Colbert
Subject: Cocohatchee Bay PUD
Michael Bosi:
My name is Tom Nelson and I am a volunteer for the Audubon Eagle Watch Program. I have continually watched
the nest in question which is designated C019 since 1997; along with fellow eagle watcher Cece English.
The developer has stated that they were not going to build anything in the primary zone until eagles have left on
their own accord: I firmly believe that the developer should be held to his promise; therefore I am against the
rezoning of this property.
I have learned from Lynda VVhite, who is in charge of The Birds of Prey Center in Maitland, Florida, that especially
since the major damage from the hurricanes of the past season, the eagles have taken a major hit. As a resident
of Collier County I and all concerned citizens should do everything possible not to destroy the Eagles habitats
which also includes many other species.
Thank you, Tom Nelson
3/16/2005
lu
Agendf~mlN?f 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 112 of 133
BosiMichael
From: Mari Nelson [marimari@naples,net]
Sent: Wednesday. March 16, 2005 11: 13 AM
To: BosiMichael
Cc: Doug Fee; Cece English; Jim Colbert
Subject: Cocohatchee Bay PUD
Michael Bosi:
My name is Tom Nelson and I am a volunteer for the Audubon Eagle Watch Program. I have continually watched
the nest in question which is designated C019 since 1997; along with fellow eagle watcher Cece English.
The developer has stated that they were not going to build anything in the primary zone until eagles have left on
their own accord: I firmly believe that the developer should be held to his promise; therefore I am against the
rezoning of this property.
I have learned from Lynda White. who is in charge of The Birds of Prey Center in Maitland, Florida, that especially
since the major damage from the hurricanes of the past season, the eagles have taken a major hit. As a resident
of Collier County I and all concerned citizens should do everything possible not to destroy the Eagles habitats
which also includes many other species.
Thank you, Tom Nelson
3/1612005
"<tto I.() C"')
c....oo 0 C"')
o .o~
ON_
-Z .0
o
~~~
~Q) >>~
~roQ)
ro2OJ
"0 ro
,.... 0...
Q)
OJ
<(
"i
as
.t:
.!:!
:E
'fi)
o
m
c
~
o
0-
~ E
<c 0
'=' 'S:
CO (3
" >.
:g in- CO
o 0 1Il
N ..lI:: s=
.... '" W t
Ql ~ ..lI:: 0
c: 0 Z
~ s= i5 E
~,~ i.: ~
~ 00:: Q) c:
s= c:: E 0
g' :>; Qi Q) 0
ecomo..!!1
.0 "0 s= s= 0)
E m .~ J5 m
:it: c::E W
u -g 'iij ..2 ~
E ~ S ~ u.
:E
<(
CO
C"')
..-
..-
....
u
e" .;.: .!!.
c ~
~:~8~
Ql
o
~
Z
0)
.5
Q)
Ql
:E
.... Q)
~ >
.9~
Oll-
.5 ~
~]>
& ~
-0.9
~:-:::
~~
_ 0
g'-e
-0 :I
&~
VJ :g
~ 8
Oll....
~t.9
Q) VJ
~ a
.90.
->.
E &
8.;3
0.. ._
o ~
...."0
--g ~
Q) (J
c 0
~ Ii
Q) 0
g-
.- ~
VJ C
VJ .....
.- 1a
~ 8
o VJ
(J ~
Q)o...
.9 rIl
~.s
.sgg
~~
00-0
c_
o 0
.b Q)
~.;3
Q)....
~ ~
-e
-0 Q)
& 0..
o
-ci ...
~o..
rIl
VJ:.g
~t+-<
0... 0
rIl
C rIl
'60 t
.~ go .
~OJ""';
>=-=
~Q)~
o-oQ)
... Q) Q)
~.;3<.l::
~~ ~
Q) =: 0
c ~ ....
.....
~-OQ)
8"3;9
(ij 0 c
- ~ 0
00
M
-:t
M
I
r--.
r--.
r--.
I
0\
rrl
N
...c:
on
:I
o
.....
~
S
~
cj
....
Q)
c
ti
~
@
....n ~
Q) ::s
c nO
."0 10-.4
t;c~
~ . S
(Jti:.;a
S~-o
o S :I
~'O~
'-:::V (J n
-@S
;;......0
...c:Q)~
'-' 1:: "0
S~]~,
O~'-:::V
(J ~ V'l
""';So::t
gO::!
@ ~ tr'l
Z"O:!
VJ ~ 0
t:: @U
Q)_......
.0 Q) n
o ... S
..... 0 0
>. oS (J
(J~.....;
fJ ~g
ZQ)@
n c 0
St;;o
13~-g
oaB
..... 0 Q)
..g(J....;J
t::@....r
@.S ~
-~ .
~(Jti
'C 5 ~
.0 ...., S Q)
.... ~ 0 .~
s g@ 0
13~o::t Z
c5 g ';; .~....
~@''''' -
@c~ Q)
- 0 ~ ~ 8
'~ ;"""-tie ~o
: -0 cO+
: -g ~ I'd
.. ...c: g,c t::M
~8u..c S 8..:1:
~8....~~@ 8~
~ c5 ~ ~.~ '7 M
'""="~-.......o (JO
~ @ ~ ~::l 'S; tr'l
"'0 (J () a - ._ 0
~.- E 0 ~~ _ u 0
1a'~ 0 ~ c Q) >. N
~u~,c...... r:; ~ 1a
!:; >''-:::V rIl rIl .... a:l ~
o~>-.a~~..,q
~~Q)@E{)t::tr'l
1~~0\080-
: 0'= 0 (J 8 z Q)~
I z..o 0 @"",.. ::I
: .. 5~~'-:::Vt)t-
I Cl~"'O~Q)..
';:;:; "'0 M .....~ Q)
: O"CO\:..Q.o~
'...O~ +:;1:1'"
: '-t.. t- 00;;:' 0. CZl 0
--
~
V"I
o
o
f"
-
~
0...
-::ten LO C"'l
--o:l 0 C"'l
0"-
)0...-
L - 0
~~:!
CI:l ClJ >>.,-
~~ ro ClJ
ro~ OJ
-0 ro
c 0...
ClJ
OJ
<(
V)
-I-'
c:
(])
~:Q
.~I V)
-1-11 (]J
(]):~
(])!
~! >-
~I~
c:\
CO I .J::
1:811:
o 0
z
EI=
.......1<:(
o
I-
--.
-tc
(\1
"0
C L-
Q) Q)
0)'"
<(~
C t) ~
0... 0
Ec 0
Q) -
Q) E u.. CI)
... ~ L-
- C "'C Q)
...L-.q-"-.o
en Q) ~ (\"') E
~ > -
t... 0 ~ u.. ('\1
:E C!) & CJ).J::
<( ~.= J2 t)
OC<(COS
('I) :J 'to- c:.-
..000Cl)
CO t) "- :.;:::. .~
:5<u~~E
1'-:.::"-1iiE
~ - 0 .- 0
Ot) ct)
.J:: t) .-
e I E
(\1c ~
:Eo
~ :.;:i
~(\1
CO U
-00
en...J
r.-
:::J
..c
J-
...
Q) m
..c ...
... .0
... m
53 J:
E-'Q)
"000>
cQ(\1
Q)NW
E~-o
~ (\1 N (\1
ml.9 ~ (Xl
J:CQ)Q)
~ .0 ~ :5
o :: L- 0
Z Q) Q....
01 a. <(0. CI)
......1 (\1 Q)
......1 L... CO g>
r:: i (\1 O? (\1
~~: ~ g -fi
0=0 0>
'-N
E;=Q)~
-cu(\1
oa .~ ~ E
~I.~ .~ 15
=1 ~~ ~
J:: 0 -.... 0
!I U (:) e-
0'1 g>~ ~
...... . - Q)
CDlc~.c
~crn...
(I) (\1 (D L-
(1)1 a. Q) ~
-I ~ Q) en
CDI'" .J:: .-
.c:Cu...
I-:::J"'c
'o(\1Q)
U-5E
L-U"C
Q) 0 C
=t)Q)
,9.. E
\oJ (\1
Q) Q)
..c ..c
J- .-
V)
<::>
<::>
N
--
\0
-
--
<""'l
~ LO C') -
c....J:O 0 C') -0 OC"CC
0..- :":::::::
OciN_ - "--~ ro-COCo
~ .0 ~ C en 1:: ro'm
OLO ~u)O ~ en =:3 c::
~ ..- ..- 0=:3 coa>ens...O "en
C':l >...- ~a> a> -0 E a> Q) a. CD ._
~roQ) CD . i:: :::> 0> a> C) ~O)
ro~ OJ (/)coa>cE:JE
"D ro >oc..co:5coc "E c::.~
c n.. s- 't-O (/)E
Q) e en m CD "'C a> 0 '- :J 0 .-.- en
OJ CO .~~ ~ - .0 ~ c.- 0
<( - ..e C Q) (/)
C (/)"0- CO 0 ~ Qj >.- CO (/) () ..
o3:CDs...""mma> (J) ...... c::
.- .~ a.C3 E en 5 Q) .8
~Ctl
o CD C Q) ~..e (/) CD ..e 0 ~E ~-..c:==
CD c: m 0.._ - 0') ..c: ~.g ~a3roo :J-co
..c: s...oc_ -
(/) -::J +:i C .>(J)o-o"CE
-enO>Q)Ec+::; 0 "' 0 . - a> .- .c c:
'UQ)en~ :J(/) - Q) ...... ::: (/) ..e ~ en co (l) CD
CD;m E CD 'U ~O) ~ a> "C t E co ...., C
3:S3:"Co~c co Ctlc:::.::::: C .en O:J - ~ 10 co
oos-CDoO(1) en Q).o 0 (1)..c::z0-0 mo'U
o 0 CD:5 CD N..e 0 Q) 0)-..;, ..e- oQ,)o_c:
0. ..e - 0 J:::...... Q) -~cQ)3:o:J(1)
~ ~ 0 en- ~.c: 0 ~o 0 4=.co..c:o..eO(/)
.~ c:: ~ a>"C+::;--3:~(1)
> CD CD C) -0 m (1) N -a>o'Uco
co >ca>E - ~@o.. -~:JC:Q)CD(l)en
.c CD.- s- C N genl:;m.cene>m
..e a> "C (ij :J. i:: 0 ~ Q) -. 3:
"0 >_ CD en a.N s... e:: ~ Q) a>coens..._o::J(i
ccom..e~a>~ Q) .Q c:: >a>6Q)O:5CD
m..eoo ..em .c ~~(ts col.c 0 a. c s- 3: -0
'U a> 0 .- tI::: - "C E ~I = -0 .2 -0 0 _ ~
--roc Q) .-0
m Cii m .c _._ c: Q) E =:3 c:: en 3: cQ):JlJ..(/)_
. ~..c: _~en'U 8 () O.!"ooo (1) ::J > 0 . CD 10
c Q) :!- . S; '+;: -CoQ)..cQ)c
ro CD ~ en ~== Q)
s...__:J 0 e:: ..0. 0 C)os...'UencOo
a.. > . CD ('I) C .c en CI) 0'-" m'en s- Q) Q) 2 N C
mCJ)c..........:J c co ICI) en m..c: CD
..ea>tQ)oo~ 0 ~ ...... Q) Q).- Q) - g> ~ s... c
Ctl-o
:Jo>m..eoc_ s... -.. J::: '_ :5 E ~:5 co 0.5: ~
omc..-s- c Q) Ctl ...... 0 enE3:o..co(/)
~ CD _ 0') a> :2 ._ 0. :S~~
't- CJ) == .5: = :J 'U 0 .- 0 o..c u 0 en :J
o (/) -e s... 0 0 == Q) ~ c:: Q) t5 0 m ~.~ N ~ ~
~m CD:JO 3::J > (l) ~ '"S, co 0> 0 ..c ..c CD 0 't-
c:c..'Uo ~.c CD ~ c +-' ..c s- .-
menC~-gQ)o "0 .t::0(ts CD .- - ~ -0 - a. s...
o~LU ..eCc CO) 0
E .5: ~ co co:5 _ Q) - C m co co c.~ 0')
..e -oo~ " co a. E .- .c c
-0> (J) -_ C - Q) ~~ en- -c
~ .2>0- Q) Qj m 3: s... -0 a.. CJ) en. - :J +:i
c3:oQ)a.:5o S ~~ s-CDQ)mQ)~a.Q)
Q) O..eo s- - OlCtl ~..e 0) 3: rn.c s... ~
:0 a> N 0 a> ~ 'a> c .S 3: -m_COO:J
CJ)..c s... 10 > Q)..e Q) J:::- CD -alcQ)co
CD +-' Q)..e a> c _ 0) ......-0 (/) :5 'U Q) Q) .- C)
a::: C).c 0 'U .0 C m Q) e:: a>t'-mE..ccc
~.5: E 0 a> (/) 0 Q) e:: co ..c ~ ..0 ~: +-' 0'-
- . i _ .- "0
co 'U Q) 8 ..c . (/) 4:= ..c 0...... ..c..e s- EI u :t: 0 on
(DCO -Ea> t- Q)~ o .- Q) "0 0
:!:s...a>E_c..c:: 0
::Ja> s- _ r--
€eO~J2E ~() ~m..cOOoa. ,
s... c: - 0 -. co ::E-Oc.O:J --
O:J_m 0 -. 0.. M
Zen 0
~:g~
0"-
iN_
? .0
~O
~~~
~ Q) :>..,-
p..:!::: ro Q)
ro:::2: OJ
-c ro
c 0-
Q)
OJ
<(
.....
Q)-
C~
" ....
> C
o :J
e'O
.Q) ()
=(1)
O.r;.
0....
@)'-
._ 0
(/)'+-
o '-
..cQ)
-c
<l)C
en en
..c -
00-
.- ..........
E
(/)
.-
..c
.....
Q)
:J
en
en
.-
C
m
.....
Q)C
~~
.....0
ma.
=E
~.-
en ;=
C::Co
..c..c.
t~
o 0
Zc
~..::.:::
ac
enO
C"w
Q) w .
N"- en
+:i E"-
'0 E
(/)0
COO
..... en
C C
m.-
tC
oC
Q,m
Ea.
. - (J.)
~..c.
Q).....
>0)
(/)-
.- "C
.....c
m
L-
Q)
..c.
.....
Q)
en
o
......
C
o
......
......
CO
.r:.
+-'
Z
o
Z
Q) -
..c -0
+-' en
C <I)
. - ....
C a
E ::
:J <I)
o (/)
o ~
C e
Q) .0
;:: .0
m t <I)
c::c'V~
..... 0
C -.. '-
Q) ('t') ::s
L- N 0
c::c en ~
m-o.9
.s ~.~
~ctS<I)
e<l).....
.- Q, ~
--I a. a.
m CG
-0 -0
(]) C
"C en
~ ~
o a
e 0
(]) <I)
> en
CO CO
..c. <I)
<I) Q.
~ ..........
~
~
o
-
(])
c::c
-Ie
-Ie
~
O!
~\
'V
0)
-q-
~
Z
o
Q.
Z
~
r---
~
tl
co
-..
(/)
.....
(/)
C
E
::s
o
o
~
e
-..
e
-0
C
-..
E
o
o
enl
3:1
Q):
ci
en!
Q)
eo
C
i,
(])
~
.....
(/)
~
co
"0
'C
o
i:i=
m
......
en
co
a
o
L-
::J
o
C')
C
"2:
Q)
en
Q)
L-
a.
o
.....
-0
(])
.....
co
o
"0
(])
P
en
o
>
l)
~
co
c::c
..c
t
o
Z
~
o
.0
..c:
0)
.-
Q)
C
~
(/)
-0
C
(])
'C
'+-
o
.....
(])
o
.....
o
Z
0)
c
:;::::;
Q)
(])
~
.....
C
CG
t
a
Q,
E
en
.r:.
.....
-0
L-
eo
~
J2
(])
(/)
m
(])
Q.
o
e
~
CO)
OL-
(/):;::::; 0
L- CG "
0"- 0
..... 0.:;
o 0.-
IDenO
.!:: en ~
O<(CG
..c
'+-O.r:.
0"> t
-0'- 0
.... () e
~ ~i.
C::Cc::c
.r:.
t
o
Z
V"\
o
o
~
0.0
-
-..
C"')
_COL{')(")
........000(")
oci~:
-ZOO
~.,-~
CIS <l) >,.,-
l:l..:!::: t1l <l)
t1l~ OJ
-0 t1l
C 0...
<l)
OJ
<(
~
C'll
.c:
.!:!
:::E
'in
o
m
o
::>
a.
>.
C'Cl
00
Q)
Ql
~
u
:! rn
a.. .g
('t') u
l() a
Oi ()
Ql
:g :5
-5 ~ c
'C Ql
"O.n E
<( ~ "0
~ C
ro ~ Ql
.0 C'Cl E
E :! a> t1l
::Z >;~ B
u
~ {g ~
-g m 'iij
C'Cl ::l a
CI) I- 00
~
Qj
C
en
:;'
'iij
m
@)
t1l
~
C'Cl
.!E.
C
2 ~
~ .21
a.. :c
E ~
~ : ~
CI
U
... ;
~ 1:=
:S-&.
~ .5
.!!l
~
"0-
CC
nJ'-
Cllll
.5 55
~~
lIl'U
~O)
01:6
C'Cl_
wa
'Oc
~~
QlC
iU8
~O)
a~
--
'0:;
5l a
m:5
~~
m .
,- m
nJ~
l!!S
C'Clm
IIlW
m _
C'Cl-
a.c3
m_
C C'Cl
'51'c
010)
~~
0)
~"O
I-a
o
. of .
'Eoiii
C'Cl .0 0)
Ql~o.
.c: 01 0.
.!!l 'Qi m
~ ~:c
'5 E B
>....-0
>.Qlc
E> ::J
00
iijm.o
.c:~m
..... 0).-
l!!C'Cl:g
::l Ql ....
m 0) ::J
O):5ro
~ClO)
C'Cl C (:;
E'(j) C)
a 0)'''''
-mm
1::..... .~
C'Cl 0 co
~l!!E
-::J"O
::l m c
.0 co co
Cl~-
.5 0.,2
a;Q.)~
O).e ::J
E-co
'00)
O)nJ.o
.e~0)
-O)en
"0>0)
c:ro:5
~~ 01
--c
C'Cl ,_
actiO)
-0)0)
Ql .... en
-co-
.00)0
co .e >.
Ql-O
.0 c:: ....,
_'- 0)
a Cl.c:
c c-_
=~cu
.- m 0)
~ <l) ....
_cco
~
:;
C'Cl
Ql
.0
.....
::l
o
.5
.e
"i
e
01
-
a
c
a
'iij
a
Q..
x
0)
0)
.e
f-
It)
,....
-
o
-
m
~
C'Cl
~
nJ
m en
Ql C
Q...Q
~~
.c:Ql
-ec
a Ql
201
O)X
:5~
c 0)
.- .c:
4::-
~C5
m-
C'Cl~
~o
C'Cl c
Ql,!!l
C::t:
~1ij
.....~
0.3:
~Ql
~.o
0)'0
:5c
--
0=
0) ~
c m
o 0)
,!!l g-
>'2
C'Cl_
000
Ql.?;-
0) ::l
.eC'Cl
.BO)
CO.o
.c:0)
8:5
a .....
()o
j
e
E
a
u
0)
.0
1il
::l
E
~
'u
c::
C'Cl
a:
iij
...
:0
C'Cl
:c
~
Cl
C'Cl
LLJ
"0
ro
Q)
(1)
:5
B
m
(1)
Cl
c::
C'Cl
..c:
o
>-
c::
C'Cl
(1)
>
e
0..
0..
C'Cl
(5
c::
a
"0
(1)
m
C'Cl
(1)
a:
u
C
:g:g
.~~
~ >; -I
..cennJ ~
.~ Ql ~ 8 en
:2~cuo ~1'
<f~E;::~~~I'~'"
= ~ (1) 'V N C") .......- (1)1
jg_()(")NC?lt? c.
E nJ..... I co co co en[
- c.~...J~CJ')co~ l'
iii ~ .Q '5 u. lO II( co m 'iijl
n - - () - I m Q) (1)1
0::: l:: C'Cl m CJ') C") 0) .. ,_
C'Cl-o E'V~C")N""'=~'
Ole: (1)0 o.N - C'Cl
QlCO-oC'Cl.eX=E '
a::: en .E ...... 2 o.~ B 0)
V')
o
o
f"
M
.-CO LD (") -
-<:0 0 (") -
0"- '.):1
jN_ tIl tIl
L. - 0 tIl II)
0 ..... -
~~~ -5 t'1?f
ell Q) >-..- ~ -.911)
~== (1J Q) ..... ~ II)
(1J2 OJ CJ) II);S
-0 (1J
c 0... .S i .....
Q) "C 0
OJ - 1::Z3
<C 'S .9 m
.!:J II)
- .... ~
(':l u
..... ..... II)
~ l:l..c:
<Jl .....
II) ~"'O
~ .s~
0
u ~'S
~ 11)._
~~
0 .....
c:Il II)
... ti;S
"'0
II) p., .-
m o Q)
0 Qj Vl
c.. ;> Q)
c.. II) u
.....
0 "'0 0
Cl II) II)C<=<
::J ~ ~]
~ "S
II)
.s .!:J en ell
a ~ ~
c- ~:-=
0 0
~ 11)..... .
E ~3:g
II) Q)
~ ..... .... 00 ~
~ - ~
:s ...., 0..-.1
~ U "'0 Q)
II) ..... II):-=;S
~ ~ "0 ::s 0 ;g
eo ..... .!:J ....
Q) I:: glt= .s B
::0 :g o rn ~
'en = eoQ) 0
ell 'S o~tih 'J:%
0 .!:J ~ _..-01 cd U
p., - ~:gQ) ~
00 ell .9.2 >.
.....
~ E .... .!:J
] ~ >. ell ~
II) .!:J.!:J 0
"'0 >'80 u
t:lO 'r;; a II) ~ "'0
Q) II) II)
.... ..... t::.s~ ell
00 .~ 0
g,.....c: p.,
~ u 0.0 0
.~ p.,Q);::l .....
Q) ::s ..... 0 c..
II) p., tIl 0 ..... .s
..c: 0 II) a.!:J
~ 0.0 .... ~ B ~
a. ~ Q) c-
~ 's 00 _ II) 0
"ai co ~ :-= Cl >. ~
c C") 0 ell ~ w:.l.~
iii cici u ..c: ~ ~ ..c:
~ to g. U ..... ....
0 ell II) ~ ell
E 0 Q) > ~..... -
CJ) II) ell
8 N -5 ~ 5::E~ l() .....
ell
..... 0 8
@) to Cl "t:l ~ ..c:O"t:l 0
..- ~ .Q - .....
Qj .r:: => Q) rA'U ~ ... 0
1:: u a. ~ ~ <'
Q) .... Q)"t:l ~ ~
CIl Q) ~~~
.r:: Qj Q) .9
g ~ ..... 1) ~ s
CIl .r::. 0
>; .r::. 0 ~ "t:l cd 1;) e:: t Ci . II)
Qj 0 10 Q)
CIl ~ tIl II) ~ Q) ~ Q)II)O Q)
"'i 1:: "C .r:: &~ ::I::~'- tIl
Q) UI 0 0 (':l
.r:: Q) 'w 0 u c.. Q) ... .- II)
ell ....... o.Q) ..... 0 ;> Q)....;l'V
.c 0 ;j 0 0 ] 0 I:: .- ..... t1:l -a
.~ u.. t- m 0 ..... u o....c: ;;;f fd.....:;
..... .... II)~
.,; o (/) oQ)>. ......8t.t.. V)
~ u ~ ~.t: z-5Q) 0 ]< ~ :0 0
E .;.; Q) Q) c.. ......J:l..c: >. ';;J 0
en :D' ..... ~
0 c (:) ~ ~ ..... (I) t:lO r-- rn ~
0 Q) :s Q) "t:l-- 8-
.. 1I)..c: "t:l ::s . \0
m LA- V) l- V) >. ~~ co<t:: ~ Q) 0 ~ -
::E ::J.!:J~ ~Sz c- -....
- ~
..-en l.C) CO')
~oCO')
Oo~= >.~
-z .0
0 ~]
~.-~
!:':l(l) >..- ?A.2
~.:t::t'il(l)
(lJ:2 rn o 0
"0 (lJ ~.s
c 0..
(I) o Ol)
OJ ~.S
<(
~ ..0
~~
CQ .....
""0
<Il ....
.S 0
01)0
01)0
.- ....
~~
..... c::
ctl.....
......
>.<Il
c:: 0
o c::
--- 0
8-f3
CL>'+-<
..cO
.....ti:l
'- >
o 0
is e
CL> CL>
""0 ....
.-
<Il ~
~~
ctl<
~ cci
..... 0
ctl a
oS
~ Ol)
c::
0.....
]11
::s c::
o 0
>.-f3
~ c::
oS .~
0 a Q)
...
::s en c::
<Il 0 0
0- ..c
~~ Q.,
I'- e ~ ~
..- .s-5 :.0
.J::. 0
E ~ ..... CL> e
11l ~:::: .
0 :2 3
u :2 ~..c'"C
:::: 0
0 a.. (I) .....""0 ~ 0
0 c: >.
.J::. co 0 ::s_ 0 ~
11l ~ .0 --.......
>. Cri OI)::S-;; 0
@ c::..o 0 .~
lO III '".;:J .s ...0
0 0 III .....
"<t 0 11l CL> .... ..... 0
I'- N a.. 000 0
..- e 0.. c::
:g lO III
c: oO'"C 1
0 ..- ..c'QJ"'3
.J::. C) ...
.e. C) ..... > 0 0
.... ~ ~ <<i~-f3i ::s .....
cv III Q) a3 2 .
:2 ..... .~
:J c: ~ 0 0
11l III 0 ~-f3 > ctlf-oO
CJ >; .J::. ctl ---
U rn &:l ... >'0 .....
1:: III ~ c: ~ ::::~ c--. ctl
"0 ..0 ~ ctl......
'i) cv III ~ o.....Q <Il c;:E
CI .0 cv 'iij o-CL> &:lctlCQ-
0 :J 0 cv CQCQ<Il-.:t 0-.
.c c:: I- CJ :2 ..cctlOh C::C""l ~ 81
.~ ..... 0 ctl ]<.~~ \rJ
.... o ...... Q) ;:...~I 0
:liE u ~ Ol) Q) 0
E .... Cl) .~ oS ~ '"- " 5 >-1 f"
'en e c :5' 1:: &:l ~ a']
0 Cl) ~ :::I (.) 0:-:: O..c --- >.0
m u. tI) tI) Q) N ..... .ga\O~ o~ -....
~ 0 c:: O:::CQ~z Q E-<I M
.... ::s
Agenda Item No. 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 120 of 133
BosiMichael
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
harlowjr@comcast.net
Tuesday, March 15,20053:58 PM
BosiMichael
Cocohatchee Bay PUD
Mr. BosL
I am writing to urge you to vote against amending the Cocohatchee Bay PUD, to allow full
time construction work.
It is obvious to those of us who are either seasonal or permanent residents of Tarpon
Cove, and who drive Vanderbilt often, that the eagles on the proposed development site are
still present. It is equally obvious that the develolper gave his commitment in 2000 that
there would be no work until the eagles were gone. The continued protection of those
eagles is invaluably more important to the environment and to this area than is enriching
another developer via the construction of yet another multi story concrete and steel box
along Vanderbilt.
Please vote no at your Thursday, March 17 meeting.
Harlow Gregory
965 Tarpon Cove Drive, #102
Naples, FL 34110
11 Skyline Drive
Ogden Dunes, IN 46368
1
BosiMichael
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 121 of 133
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Judy Ruffing [JudyRuffing@comcast.net)
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:27 AM
BosiMichael
Re: North Bay Civic
Dear Michael,
Since my Husband John Ruffing and I, Carolyn Ruffing will not be able to
attend the hearing on Thursday concerning amending the Bald Eagle Plan
to allow year round construction, we want you to know that we are very
much against the developers having the legal means to build on the site
therefore destroying the nesting of the Eagles.
Thank you,
Carolyn Judith Ruffing
1
....ro I.{) C")
--oaC")
0"-
N '-
, _ 0
-0
~...-N
N
>- ..-
~ ('lj OJ
('lj ~ 0')
"0 ('lj
c 0-
m
OJ
<(
I-
Z
W
~
W
w
0::
(!)
<(
....I
<(
Z
a
~
0
0::
W
00
CJ)
<(
z
4:
~
~ w
<( 0::
to 0
0 I-
0 W
..- ....I
It) C)
0 <(
0 w
E N 0
~ .0 ....I
..- <(
0 .c. CD
l'll ~ 0::
@ l'll Qj 0
>- ~ l'll LL.
~ >. .c. C)
::l l'll U
- ~ z
a; l'll "0
0. tI) 'in Z
as c: Q) 0
Q) ::l 0
.c .., l- ce N
"~ .:.:
:E u
E .:.: G>
"0 0 c: :S'
0 ... G> {:. :I
In LL. t/) t/)
o
..-
..-
o::~
0:5
~u..
:5fB
CJ)....I
zOo
>--<(
w(!)Z
c:::(!)~
:;:)~..-
LL..q-o
~t-z
Ot-
~
I-
<(
00
~
o
0::
LL.
~
o
....I
....I
<(
o
....I
:J
~
I-
<(
:I:
I-
LU
o
o
o
"
z
z
o
N
Z
W
"
Z
<(
:I:
o
>-
~~
Wen
enw
Oz
0.. en
o..w
0....1
-(9
~Lti
:I: 0
1-....1
:J<(
Oce ~
>-w 0::
~~:;:)~
0l.1..0~
LL.O>-o
~w~~
OZZI-
1-0<<(
:JN~Oo
0>-
>-c:::
(!)~
z-
-C:::
I-c..
Ow
~:I:
zl-
00::
Ojj
~z
Z
-0
i=
o
:J
c:::
I-
en
z
o
o
tr)
o
o
N
--
tr)
.......
--
M
-coU")C')
'-CXlaC')
o ,0"'-
ON_
-Z 0- 0
~E .,- ~
c;l Q) >-...-
~:::=('ljaJ
('lj~ OJ
"0 ('lj
c 0-
aJ
OJ
<(
:E
<(
t-
I.{)
0
..-
I.{)
0
0
N
E lli
.....
8 .c. c:
u ,2
"0 ....
l'll l'll Qj 13
@ ~ l'll .!!
~ >. .c. e
l'll u 0.
a; en "0 ~ Q)
:J tI) 'in Cl
as u aJ
.c en :J 0 m
I;::: l- ce w
,!:! .;.;
:E u
'0 E .:.: G>
0 c: ~ :S'
0 ... G> ::J
In LL t/) t/)
:Q .!!!
::J .c:
0(1)....
~.c: (1) L..
11I1-010
-... c: 'i:
(1)vi~a.
5tiuOJ
.- OJ 0 .c:
~C:I-""
.- 01
E.: . c:
El?~=o
o .... (1) c:
U c: lfl 'u
(1) 0 L.. III
.c. OJ 0. ~
....L..OJ.....
.... ro L.. 0
l\:l III Itl L..
:5~1Il0
'0 Cl~ >
OJ Itl Cl~
.oOJItlc:
... OJ OJ ,-
3.c::OJ(1)
tI).....c:.....
,- (1)..... 0
"0:;::(1)>
e:-.c: :;:: ....
(1)~.c:0
> ~ c:
OJ 0
E~50
l\:l OJ 'Z
-.c:Uvi
. .... 2 Ii]
'0 .... ..... '-
Itl Itl III U
oc:C:iE
0::080
1Il:i:i...."C
~~ili~
Q.b.c:~
III III 0-
c:c:.....OJ
'- 0.... L..
ClUC:::lvi
01,(1)0....
~~.5.c:lfl
.... = ,- .... c:
o Itl E .~ L..
~.BE"C]
o III 0 OJ....
OJIIlU~c:
> ro ro _ ,_
o a.. OJ a. OJ
UIIl"Cc:L..
c .!: Itl OJ Itl
o OlE.oOJ III
a. 01 OJ
....- >- -
l\:l~"C:8g'
~.....ro.c:OJ
cO~""(1)
,- Itl
Q)~Ii].c::5
,~ OJa. OJ .... OJ
... >.....-
a..Qro~E
Q)OJ.c:L..:;:
>>L.......
o~OJOJc:
U g.:5 .2
c~Qj.....tI
0.....>0::l
e-EOJc:b
~0'O.2:g
.t:~-:08 ~
lIl..........o 'i:
~ III '0 '- ~ 0
Cl'IOJc:>ro
....:::lltlro.c: OJ
l\:laflllllloc:>
o L.. L.. ,- ...... 0 0 co
"0 OJ................u 0
crocc:c:xc: V
oL..oOJOJroo ~
UQ)'iiiEEUla. I
l\:l:211l..........c:L.. M
c: :g 'E 'E "E ~ ~ lfl ~
~8EEEeLJ')Q.cn
oQ)oool\:l~Itl...-l
-L..UUUUmZN
tr)
o
o
("
.
-
M
-eo U") C')
.~ 0 C')
0"-
iN_
? .0
~-~~
>- .,-
~til<Ll
til~ OJ
'0 ('lj
C 00
OJ
OJ
<(
'"i
as
.c
u
i
'iij
o
m
E
o
~ ~
5i <( C
E en Q)
@ cic:i E
~ I.{) -g
~ ~ ~
U <(
:c lli 0
::I ..-
....I..c: :;:)
~ 00
iiil'll-lB
"0 :E Q) .c.
fij >.-5 ~
~~~.c.8
Q) :c "in
.c. ::l 0 0
cn~a:lO
.:.:
C.)
E.:.: G>
c: :S'
e CD 0 ::J
LL t/) .... t/)
:Q~
l\:l 0
a:l ....
....
Itl 0
.!: E
010
Oi: ....
o ::J
~ 0
lfl >-
:e~
OlE
0.(1)
e.o
0. fIl
Q) Q)
l... E
::J 0
'lO u
I::;:!
.2' I::
UlOJ
'(;j.c:
.... ~
~o
t:;:)
Itlo..
0. CIl
.... Q)
:5-5
........
Q) l\:l
"O.c:
I:: 0
Itl U
>0
ClU
I:: (1)
:0-5
1::.....
(1) 0
Et:::
l\:l ro
to.
o 1Il
o.l\:l
0.0
::10
11I0
"'N
~ .~
o C
"C .2
(1) ~
~.-
.....E
l\:l E
.c:o
....u
::J OJ
O.c:
>-.....
=>-
,S.o
0"C
.... Q)
,!!! ~
OJ l...
010.
l\:l 0.
1Il l\:l
III I::
OJ Itl
Eo::
Ill.....
:E:ij
~ E
o OJ
Q) 01
III l\:l
o I::
a.l\:l
:i::E
c.~
<IJCl
.c: l\:l
I-LU
1Il
J!!
01
Itl
(1)
01
I::
:p
III
OJ
I::
Q)
.c:
.....
:p
I::
::I
OJ
c:
05
N III
~~
E III
._ 01
... I::
0.:;:;
Q)1Il
.c:(1)
.....1::
1::01
.- I::
"0 '':
::J
::J"O
.0(1)
05
I:: N
:2~
:::l Itl
0"0
~ I::
>0
Ol U
.c:OJ
....1Il
"COJ
(1).c:
1Il.....
'E .!:
0>-
~c:
.... 0
Q)'O
0.:;::
o ::J
Qj.o
~:2
'05
~~
....>-
.... (1)
O.c:
..... ....
..... ~
:ij'lO
Ol.c:
Itl.....
CIlg'
.c: ._
..... ....
...
'Ol\:l
1::.0
Itl ....
....~ 0
~ '0'
o ....
_0
OJ U
> U
(1) l\:l
"CI::
OJ ~
.c: 0
........
~'Q3
l\:l.c:
.........
Ill.....
.... 0
:::lit:
~~
III
I::
Q)
..... .~
0....
fIl 'u
.... (1)
I:: 01
OJ l\:l
'0....
"iij OJ
OJ >
.... l\:l
OJ OJ
.c:.c:
.........
0.....
......0
~ID
(1).c:
III III
~ .~
-(1)
:;::.c:
~.....
Q)"C
011::
Itl l\:l
III III
lfl.!!!
E al
....c.
Itl III
Q)"O
u~
ItlOJ
~Cl
C I::
l\:lltl
a.-g
-OJ
~.....
.- 0
.2' I::
o .Q
.....
Q) U
.c.(1)
.... .....
"Oe
1::0.
(1) ...
E Ol
Itl ~
0....
.....:::l
010
.!: I::
(1)'-
~ ~
g'~
>-R:!
.01:
1Il l\:l
.... l...
OJ OJ
o.~
.20
OJ 0.
>"C
OJ I::
'Ol\:l
OJ>-
:5(1)
.....1::
o 0
=E
.~ 'lO
(1).c:
.c:.....
.....
0:>-'
..... ..... >-
"OC1;:
I:: ::J :::l
(1) 0 0
.oUu
:::l (jj (1)
g.= :5
.....0....
....uo
u
:c
::3tO
...J:::l.....
~o.....
....u;9;
~ e:- ....I
Ul.2LL
"0 l\:l ~
I:: ..... III
ltl"""~
_ 0'1 0.
=coro
IO('f")Z
tr)
o
o
N
--
tr)
.......
--
M
"""to L{) C")
'+-'iO 0 C')
0.0"-
ON_
-:z _0
~~~
t'O:lJ >...-
~~Q)
ro2OJ
"1:J ro
c 0-
Q)
OJ
<(
lU
.c.
-
.2
'(3
'~
en
....
lU
~
(U
....I
ui
l'll
~
l'll
....
Q)
.c.
"0
,S;
c:
Q)
E
Q)
0.
0
Q)
>
Q)
"0
....
Q)
.c.
1::
::l
-
....
.2
"0
Q)
tI)
::l
lU q)
.0
e: 0
(U
lU c..
:; III
C e:
m Q)
U 0..
iO 0
(f)
:; "C
C OJ
OJ
0 c::
'in 0
'(3 0
lU
'0 Q)
l'll .r::
Q) lU l-
e .0 Q)
~ ~ .~ (f)
~ .B
E <( ::
v OJ
0 I.{) c: (f)
U ,;...: l'll 0
@ c.. ..c:
I.{) U
C 0 ~ ....
32 0 OJ 0
U N l1:l ....
E Q) '(ij
U I.{) "0 ~ ..-
= ..... 0
>- .c. ro e: ..-
Q) ~ c: .0 l'll >.*
l'll U
e: Q) ....lUQ)
c: m Qi c.. :; Q)e:>
::2 ~ l1:l lU a..~ "t=
U >. .r;. Cl "0 O~C
~ U c: Q)UQ)
l'll l1:l Q)
~ "0 ~ Q) E >:E >
en ~~O
CD '(5 Q) 'in "0 l1:l
as ::l 0 Iii '0 OJ .- 0 0
.c C3 I- CD .0 .r::.!!!e:..-
.~ .:.: C ,-00..-
:E u o c: ~"O e-~
E .... Ql "OQ)(f)e:l'll
.; :S' lU"O~(UI-l3
0 c 0 tI) Q) ,_ c: I/) _
0 ... G> ::J l1:lU>.r;.Mo.
In LL t/) I- UJ ~~.oOOIt!
ll. 0.0 .. ..- Z
or)
o
o
f"
:.......
M
...co I.{) C') .5
~aC')
0..- e:
iN- 0)
L ,0 0)
i~~ .Q
tI)
>- ..- l'll
~ (\'J Q) .c.
~Ol Cl ~
"0 (\'J !
c 0.. :S
aJ
Ol ~
<( OJ c:
0. 0
:J C'I
U
0) C
.... '0
.!!! C'I
'0 c:
e: 0
III tI)
"E 0.
0)
0) j!
E
~ C'I
c:
:2
Q. '5
~ .Q
0) :!::
0)
e: iii
.::t:. ~
0)
:c C'I
l'll
::l 0)
0 0)
"0 .r:;
"0 .....
l'll .....
.c: (J
"0 .!!
c: e
l'll 0.
ci. III .9
:J
::3 .r:; 0)
e >- c:
<!> ~ 0
U '0
.:; lri 0)
(3 e .Q
t- 't:l
>- ..- "5
l'll c;; 0
CO .c.
.c. >- tI)
III
1:: 't:l C'I
0 ~ c: .
Z ,- >.
::l .c.o
(1) .c. ~'2
.c. I- 0)0)
.....
- e: > 0
0 0 w-
I!? C'I 0)
.5 'C:
0) 0)0
.Q 1l E>.
E o e
0) E .r:;m
E III ....
::2: 0) O).E
00 ~ :5 iU~
t- III 't:l .r: -
.q- 0' e: "0
0 ~ 0=
"0 .....~
..- c: l'll tI)>.
E Lt) ,~ .9 ~e
0 0 n; C'Im
(J 0 0 0) m,8
C\I :c
"0 >- e
m .q- e: III 0) 0 '~
@ ..- 0 aJ :5- (/J
.r:; I- .Q C'IC'1
<( ~ Z ~ ..... c:,5 w
~ 0 ,- 0 ....I
III Qj ~ e: ~Ol ~
0 :!: III 'm ~ 0
Q ~ --
>. .c. en '~ -0 't:l
Z U W ~c: c:
W l'll ~ ....I o tI) aJ ,~
a; :::i "0 (9 't:l "0 .....Qj .c. n;
e: '(ii e: e: .....
ftI <( 0 0 <( '(ii l'll l'll 0..... 0) ()
.J:. 0 :; ce W "0 > 0) 0. >- If"l
0 "C J!€ 0
u .... CO e: e .c. e: 0
i ~ l'll l'll c:....... >. ~ 0
...: .Q .Q .- tI) ~ ~ N
E .:.: III tI) ~~ --
'in :D' ~ ::l olS tr)
0 c: 0 :J :J m Q) tI) ~
0 CD ::J ..... .r: .c. .....
... III 0) a. 'm --
In LL t/) l- t/) 0) >- >. ~~ ~ e l'<)
0 ~ :E U5 <!>
Mar 16 2005 6:12PM HP LASERJET FAX
Agenda Item f'fb: As
. May 10, 2005
P~e 13Z.of~
3. ICR 'U0
.
~~ ~--
/11 L- ?VU/ ~/J fA! ~
-~ ~
~~ (0 ~
6~ E~/h~q-p~.
~k; -- p;-~<- &e-Ller
/L/s-~o Ad ~y l!v)'j .
71~ If/ >~
3 Lj/ 3~
lMll. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS.
.. OF COLLIER COUNTY
Agenda Item No. 88
May 10, 2005
Page 128 of 133
March 4, 2005
Mr. Russell A. Budd, Chatman
Collier County Planning CommIssiOn
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Dear Mr. Budd;
RE: PUDA-2004-AR-6786 Vanderbilt Partners n, lie
The League of Women Voters of Collier County requests that you deny the request to
amend Cocohatd1ee Bay PUD for the limited purpose of amending the Bald Eagle
Management Plan and reIamd references In the PUD document.
While we are sympathetic to the bald eagles, the Issue before you at this time is one of
faith in the public process. It is imperative that statements made by the applicant's
representative (and Colmty staff) when the PUD was first approved in 2000, which
became part of the public record, be adhered to by the applicant. If applicants are
allowed to agree to one thing as part d the initial approval process and then pennJtted
to change those agreements at a law date, the integrity of the planning process In
Collier County is diminished. Additionally, the public should not be placed in the position
of having to constantty monitor PUDs for "mke-backs..
The League of Women Voters has a long tradition of promoting an open governmental
system that Is repru;a ttdtIve, aa:ountable and responsive. We ask you to insure that
the PUD process continues to be aa:ountable to the people d Collier County and that
you deny the applicant's request.
Sincerely,
~Cu
Sheilah Crowley
PresIdent, league of Women Voters of Collier County
P.O. Box 9883 . NllpIes, FkHtdiI34101 . Phone (239) 263-4656. EInaR: /rntwx:tI1IIapfes.net
Internet: http://naples.net/presentsllwvcc
Agenda Item No, 88
May 10, 2005
Page 129 of 133
COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (CCME)
Policv 7.1.2(3)
(3) The County shall, consistent with applicable GMP policies, consider and utilize
recommendations and letters of technical assistance from the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission and recommendations from the US Fish and Wildlife Service
in issuing development orders on property containing listed species. It is recognized that
these agency recommendations, on a case by case basis, may change the requirements
contained within these wildlife protection policies and any such change shall be deemed
consistent with the Growth Management Plan.
January 29, 2004
Marti Chumbler - (outside council, advising the council on the policy above)
problem is with the language, The comp, plan, as currently written, says, the county shall,
consistent with Growth Management Plan policies, consider and
utilize recommendations and letters of technical advisement from the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Service and the U.S, Fish and
Wildlife Service. It's been--
CHAIRMAN FIALA: So shall means will, right?
MS. CHUMBLER: It says shall, that means it's mandatory.
CHAIRMAN FIALA: Right, okay. I just wanted to clarify that,
MS. CHUMBLER: Consistent with the Growth Management
Plan; however, the same policy goes on to say that, it is recognized
that on a case-by-case basis, these letters of technical advisement and
recommendations may be inconsistent with the Growth Management
Plan, and in those cases they'll be deemed to be consistent with the
Growth Management Plan.
Your staff does not know what that means.
COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I don't know either.
MS. CHUMBLER: It needs to be clarified.
And if you put off making any revisions to the compo plan to at
least clarify what that means, you've left your staff not knowing how
to apply it.
COMMISSIONER HALAS: Exactly,
MS. CHUMBLER: So, you know, there are these larger Issues
that are hovering over this that deal with the sort of policy issues of
how you want to address the regulation of protection of wildlife. But
the -- the initial issue, the Initial problem that your staff Is trying to
tackle and trying to deal with on a daily basis is, how do we apply
this compo plan provision; we don't know what it means.
CHAIRMAN FIALA: Commissioner Henning?
COMMISSIONER HENNING: Dealing with the latter, we do,
in some cases, deal with listed species. So do you need that type of
I
\
1--
Agenda Item No, 8B
May 10, 2005
Page 130 of 133
(3) The County shall, consistent with a~licable GMP
policies, consider and utilize recommendations and
letters of technical assistance from the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission and
recommendations from the US Fish and Wildlife
Service in issuing development orders on property
containing listed species. It is recognized that these
agency recommendations, on a case by case basis,
may change the requirements contained within these
wildlife protection policies and any such change shall
be deemed consistent with the Growth Management
Plan.
GOAL 6: THE COUNTY SHAll IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE
AND APPROPRIATELY USE ITS NATIVE VEGETATIVE
COMMUNITIES AND WilDLIFE HABITAT.
(4) Selection of preservation areas shall reflect the following criteria in
descending order of priority:
M a. Areas known to be utilized bv listed species or that serve as
corridors for the movement of wildlife shall be preserved and
protected in order to facilitate the movement of wildlife through the
site, consistent with the requirements of Policy 7.1.1 of this element.
GOAL 7: THE COUNTY SHAll PROTECT AND CONSERVE ITS
FISHERIES AND
WilDLIFE.
(11)(11I) OBJECTIVE 7.1
The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from listed
animal species and their habitats.
Policy 7.1.2
(2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species shall be
submitted for County approval.'A plan shall be required for all
projects where the wildlife survey indicated listed species are
Agenda Item No, 88
May 10,2005
Page 131 of 133
utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed
species. These plans shall describe how the proiect directs
incompatible land uses away from listed species and their
habitats,
(a) Management plans shall incorporate proper techniques to protect
listed species and their habitat from the negative impacts of proposed
development. Developments shall be clustered to discouraqe impacts
to listed species habitats. Open space and veaetation preservation
requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between
wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated bv human activities.
Policy 7.1.4
All development shall comply with applicable federal and state
permitting requirements regarding listed species protection,
(I) OBJECTIVE 10.6:
The County shall conserve the habitats, species, natural shoreline
and dune systems contained within the County's coastal zone.
COI.{)C")
--<'() 0 C')
0"'-
~NI+-
, ,0
-0
E"'-~
Q) >-...-
~('ljaJ
co:2: OJ
"0 CO
c 0-
aJ
OJ
<(
~
~
o
.
l.r)
o
.
o
~
~
o
.~
~
U
Q)
rfJ
U
o
~
00
~
o ~ ~
oo~ 0 .;::: " "
d.~ cd ....,
O~Q)..o
.~ ~...d ~
t) ~ u c.\j
.~ Q).~ 8
M 00 ~ t,
ooQ)..o~a
Q) ~ ~ ~ ,-l
~ Q) ~ 0
oo~ ~ ~ ~ .~
~ ~ '-\.I ~ ~
.9 ~ 2 .s g
~~dU~
~ Q) Q) ~.~
~...d cd ~ .~
~ u ~ ~ r-
'.0 .zg · ~ 8 ~ A ~ i
oo~...d Q)
Q) cd ~ ~ .~ . ~
bQ)oQ)~QJ
..d a $-I 8 tZl $-I
~ "." (l) Q) ~ Q)
;;> \.1..4 d Q)..o ~
00 ~ ~ ~ '"'0 .~
Q) c.\j 0 Q) (l) ~
~~(l)..o~o
u b.O ,..-I ~ 0 ~
(l)~Cd~ ~
~~~...d ~ &
~ 00 0 00 (l) '-\.I
OJU")(")
CXlg~
ON_
Z - 0
aC')
E"'-(")
(i) >-.,- r"
=:: m (i) Vf~
~~g'~ (l) 0
& 0- cd ~ ~ .~
<( Q) 00 ~.,n b/J.~ ~
0.. Q) 00 "'C ~ 0 -+-> ~
00 ~ ~ ~ ~ -+-> 00 ~
r"'\ (]) Q) ~ 00 (]) Q) ~
~.....-40Ucd.....-4.....-4~cd
~ OJ) -+->,~ Q).;S.,n ~ ~
~cd~~d~cd~
Q) cIj cIj $:< ~ Q) .,n
~ ~ "a 0 .r!l ~.,n ~ "'C
-+-> cd -+-> ~ ~ ''-< -+-> ~
~ ~ ~.;!Z c::: ~ g ~ aJ
:Ecd(])~O~ ~~
-+->4-;S~-+->Q)::Joo~
· ,..... 0 Q) \JJ ~ ~ > cd
~ OJ)O~-+->;;;>~~
Q) cd Q) ~ ~ ~ d.~
""8 g ~ ~ '"'" O.;S.S ~
"'C (]) ~~ (]) ~~~ ~
.,..... 00 S ~o ~ 0 ~ ~ Q)
;> Q) ~ .,..... ~ U ~
o ~ cd ~~ t 0 ::s ~
'"'" 0.. 00.t:: d 0 0.. 00 0
;:p ~ ~ cIj 0.. -+-> ~ 8
00 ~~.,n d ~ o~ "
~ ..p.~ cIj $:< 0 ~ 0 "'C "00
o 00 "'""""" · ...... 4-; · ~ S ;::$ ~ ~
..p .~ ~ :> 0 d 0.. "'C ~.9
~Q)-+->~OO$:<o;"'O-+->
~ Q) ~i3 8 cd~ c1j~]~
,,~ ~ ~ ~ .,..... ~;> cd ~
~ +-J \J cd ~ 1.\,1 (]) .,n 0
~Bai3g-B"'Cc.8roo
---
t:l
o
.....
rn
rn
.~
o
U
~
o
U
~
o
"E
t':S
o
~
I
o
o
o
~
~
-
.........
~
-
~
S
~
00
U
;>
.....
--
::s
()
u
~
~
I
r---
U
00
t':S
~
--
Agenda Item No, 8C
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 87
~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493, Santa Barbara Landings PUD, Blue Bell-Meridian Partners,
represented by D. Wayne Arnold, of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., requesting a
rezone from Residential Multiple-Family-6 (RMF-6) to Residential Planned Unit
Development (RPUD) to be known as the Santa Barbara Landings PUD for property
located at the southeast corner of Radio Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 4,
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
OBJECTIVE:
The petitioner seeks to have land rezoned from its current zoning designation of Residential
Multiple-Family-6 (RMF-6) to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for the purposes
of developing a residential planned unit development at a density of7.0 dwelling units per acre,
for a maximum permitted 291 dwelling units.
CONSIDERA TIONS:
~
The subject site consists of 41.6 acres, and has a zoning designation of Residential Multiple-
Family (RMF-6). The RMF-6 zoning allows a maximum density of six dwelling units per acre.
The subject site is presently developed with 248 multiple-family dwelling units for a density of
six dwelling units per acre.
The petitioner wishes to rezone the subject site from RMF-6 to Residential Planned Unit
Development (RPUD) in order to build an additional 43 residential dwelling units for a total of
291 dwelling units. This will increase the presently approved density from six dwelling units per
acre to seven dwelling units per acre. The subject site would be eligible for a total 291
residential dwelling units if this petition was approved.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The rezoning of this PUD by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is
no guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development,
however, if the property is rezoned, a portion of the existing land will be developed and the new
development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities.
,,-..
The County collects impact fees before the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
identified projects in the Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element as needed to
maintain adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the
requirements of concurrency management, fifty percent (50%) of the estimated Transportation
Impact Fees associated with the project are required to be paid simultaneously with the approval
of each final local development order. Other fees collected before the issuance of a building
permit include building permit review fees and utility fees associated with connecting to the
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
Executive Summary
Bee Mtg, 4/12/05
Page 1 of4
Agenda Item No, Be
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 87
.-
County's water and sewer system. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad
valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements.
Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by Staff
and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT:
The subject property is designated Urban (Urban Mixed - Use District, Urban Residential
Subdistrict). as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Gro\\-th Management Plan, This
district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential uses, including
mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. Relevant to this petition. this
Subdistrict permits a variety of residential unit types at a base density of 4-dwelling units per
acre (DU/A) and limited to a maximum of 16 DU/A, as allowed under the Density Rating
System. Being located within a Residential Density Band, as depicted on the Future Land Use
Map and described in the Future Land Use Element, this project is eligible for the addition of
three residential units per gross acre. Therefore, this project qualifies for a density of7 DU/A.
Base Density
Residential Density Band
Total Base Density
4DU/A
+3 DU/A
7 DU/ A
--
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed uses and density may be deemed
consistent with the Future Land Use Element.
TRANSPORTAION ISSUES;
The Transportation Department has reviewed the rezoning petition. A Traffic Impact Statement
(TIS) was not required for this petition, because only 43-residential dwelling units were added.
The petition is located in a Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA), and the
proposed additional dwelling units would not result in an additional traffic volume that would
exceed one percent allowable traffic increase for this area. As a result, this project is not
projected to significantly impact any Collier County collector or arterial road segment, and
therefore this petition is consistent with Policies 1.3, 1.4, 5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation
Element.
In addition, the applicant has agreed to donate an additional ROW comer clip that was identified
as a need during the recent design phase.
ENVIRONMENT AL ISSUES:
Environmental Services Staff has reviewed the petition and has incorporated safeguards within
the PUD document to insure compliance with the environmental regulations and is provided in
Environmental Section 4.4 of the PUD document.
~
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
Executive Summary
Bce Mtg, 4/12/05
Page 20[4
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 87
The Environmental Advisory Council did not have to review this petition, because the proposed
area to be developed did not exceed the 10-acre minimum area requirement.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
The cepe reviewed and approved this petition at their March] 7. 2005 meeting with a vote of 6
to 2 with the staffs recommendations. The approval included the following conditions:
]. The construction of the eight foot in height wall along the eastern property line shall be
completed when Tract "B" (the additional 43 multiple-family dwelling units) is
completed,
2. Footnote 5 of Table 1 shall be amended to reflect "4 units per acre shall apply to Tract
"B'''',
3. Deviation # 1 shall be revised to provide a six-foot wide sidewalk,
4. The PUD document shall be amended to provide current Land Development Code (LDC)
references and general revisions as directed by the County Attorney.
The two CCPC members that recommended denial indicated that the project should have gone to
the EAC. Because two Planning Commissioners recommended denial, this petition could not be
placed on the Summary Agenda.
,-
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a
determination by the BCC must be based. The legal considerations are reflected in the CCPC
evaluation of the listed criteria in Chapters 10.03.05 and 10.02.13.B.5 of the LDC. These
evaluations are completed as separate documents that have been incorporated into the attached
staff report. A summary ofthe legal considerations and findings are noted below:
. The proposed change has been deemed consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies
and Future Land Use Map and the applicable elements of the OMP.
. The proposed land uses are compatible with the existing land use pattern.
. The proposed change will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. This project has also been
deemed consistent with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Traffic Element of the OMP.
. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private, shall be provided.
RECOMMENDA TION:
Staff recommends approval of petition PUDZ-2003-AR-4493 subject to the conditions of
approval that have been incorporated into the PUD document, which included the
.-
PUDZ-2003- AR -4493
Executive Summary
BCC Mtg. 4/12/05
Page 3 of 4
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 87
.....--.,
recommendation of approving the four requested deviations, as identified in Section 2.] 4 of the
PUD document.
Conditions of Approval:
I. The construction of the eight-foot in height wall along the eastern property line
shall be completed when Tract "B" (the additional 43 multiple-family dwelling
units) is completed,
") Footnote 5 of Table 1 shall be amended to reflect "4 units per acre shall apply to
Tract "B",
3, Deviation # ] shall be revised to provide a six-foot wide sidewalk,
4, The PUD document shall be amended to provide current Land Development Code
(LDC) references and general revisions as directed by the County Attorney.
-'
Deviations
1. Seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.AA for sidewalks within multi-family site
developments. The petitioner is seeking relief from the requirement to provide a
6-foot wide sidewalk on both sides of the street, or a ] O-foot wide sidewalk on
one side of the street.
2, Seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 Buffering Requirements. The petitioner is
seeking relief from the minimum 20-foot wide buffering requirement for
developments that front on a collector or arterial road.
3. Seeks relief from the Construction Standards Manua] for Street Right-of-Way
width. The petitioner is seeking relief from the required minimum 50-foot width
for local road right-of-ways.
4, Seeks relief from the Construction Standards Manual for Dead-End Streets. The
petitioner is seeking relief from the required maximum length of local roads
before providing for a cul-de-sac.
PREP ARED BY:
Michael J. De Runtz, C.F.M., Principal Planner
Department of Zoning & Land Development Review
,-..
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
Executive Summary
Bee Mtg, 4/J 2/05
Page 4 of 4
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Approved By
Cotl~;!an<':.{", A, ,Johrt.':;{'H<
CnrnrnUfllty Df!V~!loDnlen\ ,'S.
cn'jifonHl~nt;li Set"
Aqf.'('lda Item No, 8e
- May10, 2005
Page 5 of ifF
COLLIER COllNTY
80ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Be
This item W!'.IS continued from lhe !..pril12. 2005 Bee meeting and!s req\.-iested to De
iw1i,er contnued to the June 28, 2005 Bce meewlg Tnis llern requires thaI ali pa!ilc!paniS
be sworn in and ex pal1e disclosure t,e provided by Commi:s:;.i0n tT"lernbers. PUDZ.2003-
AR.4493, San!a Barbara Landings: PUD, reqll€stt!1g a rezone from Restdenkll M\.!ltiple-
FafTIiiy-6 {RMF-6) 10 Residentiai Planned Unit Development (RPUD) 10 be known as the
$f:!!1ta i3sfD3ra Landit~gs PLiD tM property Ice.lilted ,~t tl~e 50tJtheast :::orner af Radio Road
and Santa Barb:'H8 8culevan:i, in Sec'tQrl 4 TowmMltp 50 SI;'l~ltn, Range 2.6 E;<'l!>t. CQILel
County. r-'Iof"ida
I),' 1 0/2005 ;):00.00 .t~r,.'
Om'!rMions. Al1.('ijy~t
Date
ComnHHlI1'! Dl!>'",,!loprm~nr &.
4;22,'2005 11 :2~ AM
Fn1nrOI)lllf?fl"\<il SE'rvict'.'\. ^Ifrnltl,
RHY &.,lic'o'.'';
ChU;4 Pi.]n~lcl
Date
Approved B~
(;O,ll<nun,tv D(~ilei()~'lflf.'tit ,':.
En "il\HH11<'1I\<1; .s(;r"K~.':;
ZO'H1H: lifnn Devcio,:mlf'F'1 fo;'~',/lt"Y,
-iJ2s:nos !'J:1f M,~
t:Xe!:lltlV!~ 5~~crel:,Jt)i
O;llr.
Appro,"'ed II~
S;~IHJra LE~,?t
COnlfllunlty Developmel't &.
ElJvilDnrnp.fltal 5ervlc~!!.
Community Devt;!!oplYlent &
Et"JirOfll'nel,tal Servicr~s Admin,
4/251200510:08 AM
Date
Approved B,.,
J<)~(~ph K, SdllYJitl
Community D~""E'i(lprnf;'!lt &.
Enyironnll'n!i!i $NVFC(!'S
Community Development &
Environnnmtal Services AtlOlinstrn1of
Cj:mmll.mily Dl'veiopment &
[lwifOflmfi'l\t<lt SI!IV'C(~':> Admill.
4l2!i120G5 4:08 PM
Zoning & land Development Director
Da.t~
Approved By
SUS,Clll fI,~Urr:IY, Ale?
Community Development &
Environmental Ser",ict's
Zonillq & I.mllJ D~v~~h)pmmlt R~rvil~w
4.126/200510:57 AM
Nl)tm E, Fedi!'f, A1Cf~
TfWlS;p(Htatiull Divi$lOlJ Admilli"tmtor
Date
Approved By
lransportic)J1 5t!rviGt!~
Tr.H1!;porlation St:rvices Admin.
412:6120052:50 PM
Appro\'ed By
{)(Hlald L. Sl:ult
Transpol1ion 5ervicl!'s
lr,m~port.ati()n PI;!inni!l~ Ojfec:tor
Oak
Tl-ans.portatioll Planning
4/27rltl0511:22: AM
A~'!d!>tant County AHofney
Da1e:
Approved By
Patrick G, White
C<Il.HlfV Atlnnmy
Coullty Attorn~y ()ttiCI~
4,'25:'10052:17 PM
OMB Coordillatcr
Aclnw1istrative A.s.si~tant
Da1e
Approved U)'
County Miln.~ger'!i OffiCI!
Oi1j(;t~ or M.anag(':mlm{ & B\lri~jP.l
4r26i2005 4;10 PM
Bud9~t AT1;Jly~t
Date
Approved By
Mark back.s.Ol'
CO\ll1ty Manager's Office
Office of Managemt:m, & B~ldget
5l2.'10QS 6;03 PM
Mll:hael 5myl<:ow:;ki
MmHlgt'fnlmt &. BUdgl'l Dlr",cWI
i),lte
Approved By
COlmt.y M3l1ager.s Offlt;t<
Offi<.'e of Managernenl & Budget
513120054:39 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
f)nnrd of COUt'llY
Cnrnmi1.l>ioner$
County r-/'aIUtgel
Date
COUllly Manager'!\; Ottic.e
5.13/:/005 6;OJ PM
A~Ijt~~~~~~
Page 6 of 87
Co1mr Cou.nty
~~ -
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNL'JG COl\1MISSION
FROM:
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING .A..ND LANTI DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DNISION
HEARING DATE: M.I\RCH 17,2005
SUBJECT:
PETITION PUDZ-2003-AR-4493, SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD
AGENT/APPLICANT:
OWNER: Blue Bell-Meridian Partners
1166 Dimock Lane
Naples, FL 34110-0910
AGENT: D. Wayne Arnold
Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P .A.
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting a rezone from Residential Multiple-Family-6
(RMF-6) to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to be known as the Santa Barbara
Landings POD.
GEOGRAPIDC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the southeast comer of Radio
Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida. (See illustration on following page)
PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The subject site consists of 41.6 acres, and has a zoning designation of Residential Multiple- Family
(RMF-6). The RMF-6 zoning allows a maximum density of six dwelling units per acre. The subject
site is presently developed with 248 multiple-family dwelling units for a density of six dwelling units
per acre.
The petitioner wishes to rezone the subject site from RMF-6 to Residential Planned Unit
Development (RPUD) in order to build an additional 43 residential dwelling units for a total of 291
dwelling units. This will increase the presently approved density from six dwelling units per acre to
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD
1 of 15
CCPC MTG. 3/3/05
(.)LDt-
..-., 0 CO
0-.-
NO
-Ot--
>= ,..- (J)
W>-OJ
:::=('lj6:
ro~
"0
C
aJ
Cl
<(
~
!
I 0..
<(
:E
w
r-
awlJlnDl YWaW8 VJ.H'tS -
en
~
~
~ I
I I C')
I ~
...
...
I
<<
0(
C')
0
.-.-- 0
N
.
..... .... - / I- N
- 0
:;:)
a.
=-
z.
! 0
Bll "i! ....
::I. ii Jl II = ~
I w
a.
~ a..
~ ~ ~ II i~ <C
" . if Il.
II ~
Il I
I z
c 0
~
-
I-
<(
" U
8.. 0
2;i 11
, I -1
lL"a1V~
~ ~ I
I
......-.
JI l!
c.)U")!'--
~g~
"';N 0
Z -co
Om
~~ ~
03>-~
~COo..
;:2
-g
aJ
Ol
<(
I
I
r
~
i~
d
~
~~
d
0I'0tI~..
,..,.,.....
c;~,:L"~,>;PJJ I
'1:.,' ~ I
., ' > I
,;, a: ,
"_:'~'L,::~
,.,,".""'<~..,'
r-(' ....,.
' ~ . ,..' ~>....._,,>~""""-~~'......
"'-"'>'->1~'-'
~~I
~
I~
d
~
~
BUBun
r Ii' W!
I ~
~
~
~
-<
2
'lpH
1~II:i
i~'U
~i~n~
g !i!li!
;
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
seven dwelling units per acre. The subject site would be eligible for a total 291 residenfla~Id~@flrrtg
units if this petition was approved.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
Subject Parcel: Multiple-family dwelling units and undeveloped acreage, zoned Residential
Multiple- Family-6 (RMF-6)
Surrounding- North: Radio Road, then single-family and townhouse residential development
zoned Berkshire Lakes PUD that was approve at 3.99 units per acre.
East: Single-family and multiple-family residential, zoned Plantation PUD
permitting 418 dwelling units and at a density of 4.99 units per acre,
South: Calusa Park Elementary School and undeveloped acreage, zoned
Bembridge PUD
West: Santa Barbara Road, then commercial and multiple-family residential
development, zoned Berkshire Lakes PUD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY:
The subject property is designated Urban (Urban Mixed - Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict),
as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan.
Future Land Use Element: This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-
residential uses, including mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. Relevant to
this petition, this Subdistrict permits a variety of residential unit types at a base density of 4-dwelling
units per acre (DU/A) and limited to a maximum. of 16 DU/A, as allowed under the Density Rating
System. Being located within a Residential Density Band, as depicted on the Future Land Use Map
and described in the Future Land Use Element; this project is eligible for the addition of three
residential units per gross acre. Therefore, this project qualifies for a density of? DU/A.
Base Density 4 DU/ A
Residential Density Band +3 DU/A
Total Base Density 7 DU/A
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed uses and density may be deemed
consistent with the Future Land Use Element.
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTABARBARA LANDINGS PUD
2 of 15
CCPC MTG. 3/3/05
I
R ....
-
i1 --
I ,.
-..
ZONING MAP
- EXHIBIT 3
PUDZ-2003-AR
SANTA B -4493
. ARBARAL
ANDINGS PUD
3 of 15
ccpe M
TG, 3/3/05
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 87
AERIAL MAP - EXHIBIT 4
Transportation Element: The Transportation Department has reviewed the rezoning petition, A
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) was not required for this petition, because only 43-residential dwelling
units were added. The petition is located in a Transportation Concurrency Management Area
(TCMA), and the proposed additional dwelling units would not result in an additional traffic volume
that would exceed one percent allowable traffic increase for this area As a result, this project is not
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD 4 of 15 CCPC MTG. 3/3/05
Agenda Item No. 8e
projected to significantly impact any Collier County collector or arterial road segme~~~O~~~re
this petition is consistent with Policies 1.3, 1.4, 5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation Element.
Open Space/Conservation: The POO document indicates that a combination of landscape areas,
buffers, preserve areas, lakes, water management areas, and qualifying open space areas exceeds the
Land Development Code (LDC) requirements.
ANAL YSIS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a
favorable determination must be based. These criteria are specifically noted in Section 10.02.13 of the
Land Development Code and required staff evaluation and comment. The Planning Commission to
the Bee also used these criteria as the basis for their recommendation. Appropriate evaluation of
petitions for amendments to PUDs should establish a factual basis for supportive action by appointee
and elected decision-makers. Eacb of the potential impacts or considerations identified during the
staff review are listed under each of the criterion noted and are summarized by staff, culminating in a
detennination of compliance, non-compliance, or compliance with mitigation. These evaluations are
completed as separate documents and are attached to the staff report. (See Exhibit "A" and Exhibit
"B")
Environmental Analvsis: Environmental Services Staff has reviewed the petition and has
incorporated safeguards within the POO document to insure compliance with the environmental
regulations. The Environmental Section 4.4 of the POO document.
The Environmental Advisory Council did not have to review this petition, because the proposed ar~a
to be developed did not exceed the ten-acre minimum area requirement.
Transportation Analysis: Transportation Department Staff has reviewed the petition and has
recommended approval subject to the conditions contained in Section 5.8 of the POO document.
Utility Issues: The Utilities Department Staff has reviewed the petition, and has recommended
approval subject to the conditions contained in Section 5.7 of the PUD document.
Zoning and Land Development Review Analvsis: The evaluation by professional staff includes an
analysis of the project's relationship to the community's future land use plan, and whether or not a
rezoning action would be consistent with the GMP. Other evaluation considerations include an
assessment of adequacy of transportation infrastructure, other infrastructure, and compatibility with
adjacent land uses. In addition, staff offers the following s}TIopsis.
Relationship to Future Land Uses - A discussion of this relationship, as it applies specifically to
Collier County's legal basis for land use planning, refers to the relationship of the proposed zoning
action to the Future Land Use Element of the GMP. The subject property is designated Urban
(Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict), and within the Activity Center #6 (Davis
Boulevard - Santa Barbara Boulevard) Residential Density Band for as identified on the Future Land
Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. This district permits residential uses as proposed. at the
density proposed. Staff believes that the petitioner's requested uses and density are compatible with
the Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, thus this petition is consistent with the GMP.
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD
5 of 15
CCPC MTG. 3/3/05
Agenda Item No, 8C
Relationship to Existing Land Uses - The subject property is bordered by Santa Bar_if~~~~d,
Radio Road, Plantation POO, and the Bembridge PUD, The subject property is located in the
Residential Multiple-Family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. This zoning district permits 6 units per
gross acre. The 41.61 acres would yield 249 units. Presently, Santa Barbara Landings contains 248
dwelling units. In rezoning the subject property to a Residential Planned Unit Development
(RPUD), the petitioner is proposing an additional 43 residential dwelling units, and achieving a
maximum of 291 residential dwelling units through a density of 7 dwelling units per acre (4 Base +3
Density Bonus). The adjoining residential development to the east, Plantation POO, was approved
for a total of 418 dwelling units on 83.70 acres (4.99 dwelling units per acre). Berkshire Lakes PUD,
which is located to the north and west, was approved for 4,200 dwelling units on 1,093 Acres (3.99
dwelling units per acre). The Bembridge PUD, which is located south of the subject property, was
approved for 239 dwelling units on 39,83 acres (6 dwelling units per acre). Therefore, staff believes
the uses allowed in the petition would not adversely impact the existing residential land uses in the
area. Furthermore, staff believes that the development regulations, landscaping, and the screening
and buffering requirements of the PUD District would meet the goals of the GMP, and enhance the
aesthetic quality of this area.
Deviation Discussion:
The petitioner is seeking four deviations and has identified them in Section 2.14 of the PUD
document.' The petitioner has provided justification in support of the deviations in correspondence
received by the staff on February 10, 2005 (Exhibit B). Staff has analyzed the deviations and
provides the analyses and recommendations below.
.
Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.AA for sidewalks within multi-family site
developments. The petitioner is seeking relief from the requirement to provide a 6-foot wide
sidewalk on both sides of the street, or a 10-foot wide sidewalk on one side of the street. The
petitioner is proposing that:
a) A 5-foot wide sidewalk: shall be provided on only one side of the internal local or private
roadway exceeding 1,000 feet in length serving the project's additional 43-unit component.
b) An internal sidewalk connection from the southernmost development tract (Tract B) to the
existing pool/club area shall be provided at the time of construction within Tract B.
The petitioner provided the justification for this deviation in an August 9, 2004, letter to staff stating
the following:
"'Deviations have been proposed relating to sidewalks within the Santa Barbara Landing PUD. A
majority oj the site has been previously developed and cannot be retrofitted with dual sidewalks
internal to the site. Meetings with Transportation Staff resulted in an agreement that sidewalks on
one side of the internal street system were sufficient, The developer further agreed to provide an
internal pedestrian connection linking the recreation tract with the newly proposed development
area of the project. . "
Staff is supporting deviation No.1, noting that this project incorporates some unusual condition in
that the majority of the multiple-family residential development is completed. Due to the space
required for providing sidewalks on both sides of the street in the new phase and the limited area of
the subject property, providing a side walk on one side of the street and a sidewalk connection to the
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD 6 of 15 CCPC MTG. 3/3/05
Agenda Item No. Be
, 'd ~ d .' d' S ff th M!?Y 10-, 2005h
recreatiOn areas proVl es a sale an converuent pe estnan access. ta, ere~ ~t e
deviation in compliance with LDC Section lO.02.I3.A.3, in that the petitioner has demonstrated that
"the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the
community."
Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 Buffering Requirements. The petitioner is
seeking relief from the minimum 20-foot-wide buffering requirement for developments that front on
a collector or arterial road. The petitioner is proposing that:
Perimeter buffers abutting rights-of-way shall be permitted to deviate from the required 20-foot wide
Type D buffer, to permit a Type D buffer an average of 20-foot in width, with no part of the buffer
being less than fifteen-foot in width. The minimum area for the combined buffers along Radio Roac
and Santa Barbara Boulevard shall be 66,129 square feet (1.52= acres),
The petitioner provided the justification for this deviation in a February 10, 2005, letter to staff stating
the following;
'The deviation for Perimeter buffers has been requested to support the existing
buffer conditions. "
Staff is supportive of deviation No.2 due to the fact that the buffer along Radio Road is adjacent to a
preserve area, and the buffer along Santa Barbara Boulevard will be designed as a "B" buffer, which
will provide enhanced screening. Staff therefore fmds the deviation in compliance with LDC Section
1O.02.13.A.3, in that the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a
detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community."
Deviation 3 seeks relief from the Construction Standards Manual for Street Right-of-Way width. The
petitioner is seeking relief from the required minimum 50-foot width for local road right-of-ways.
The petitioner is proposing:
Street right-of-way width: The minimum right-of-way width to be utilized for local streets and culs-
de-sac shall be 40-feet. Drive aisles serving multi-family tracts shall not be required to meet this
standard. Streets and drive aisles shall meet applicable NFP A criteria, State Fire Code NFP A _
13.5.2.2.
The petitioner provided the justification for this deviation in a February 10, 2005, letter to staff stating
the following; .
" The proposed 40-foot right-of-way width for internal street is sufficient to support
the required infrastructure for the newly proposed development area of the PUD.
This deviation has been previously approved by Collier County."
Staff is supportive of deviation No.3 with the stipulation that the streets shall remain private. The
current interior roadway system is privately maintained and the added roadway surface would be the
same. Staff, therefore, finds the deviation in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, in that the
petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the
health, safety and welfare of the community."
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD
7 of 15
CCPC MTG. 3/3/05
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10,2005
Deviation 4 seeks relief from the Construction Standards Manual for Dead-End ~.5 of rhe
petitioner is seeking relief from the required maximum length of local roads before providing for a
cul-de-sac. The petitioner is proposing:
Culs-de-sac may exceed a length of I,OOO-feet.
The petitioner provided the justification for this deviation in a February 10, 2005, letter to staff stating
the following;
"The deviation for cul-de-sac lengths exceeding 1,000 feet has been requested to
provide flexibility in final subdivision design. Exceeding 1,000 feet in length for a
cul-de-sac street will pose no life safety threats, as the roadways will be designed to
accommodate appropriate turning radius for fire apparatus."
Staff is supportive of deviation No.4 with the stipulation that the streets shall remain private. The
current interior roadway system is privately maintained and the added roadway surface would be the
same. Staff, therefore, fmds the deviation in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, in that the
petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the
health, safety and welfare of the community."
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING: Synopsis provided by Fred Reischl, former
Principal Planner, Zoning and Land Development Review, Approximately 25 neighboring property
owners andlor their representatives attended the presentation given by Wayne Arnold of Q. Grady
Minor & Assoc, Richard Yovanovich, Esq. was also on hand for the meeting. Most of the concerns
of the neighbors centered on traffic impacts and the destruction of preservation vegetation to construct
the new units. Mr. Arnold stated that the developer intends to build a 6-foot-high concrete privacy
wall between the Plantation PUD and new residential units. Mr. Floyd Chapin, representative for
Sapphire Lakes PUD stated that the neighborhood was "vehemently opposed" to the new
development. The original proposed Affordable Housing units on the south end of the property were
opposed by neighbors, citing concerns regarding declines in property values and increased criminal
activity. The neighbors also questioned why it seems that East Naples is the target for most
Affordable Housing development. Mr. John Humphries, Esq., representing the Plantation PUD
property owners also stated that the neighbors opposed the original proposal to increase the density to
include affordable housing. The applicant is no longer proposing any affordable housing units
through this rezoning application.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward a recommendation
of approval of petition PUDZ-03-AR-4493 subject to the conditions of approval that have been
incorporated in the PUD document.
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD
8 ofl5
cepc MTG. 3/3/05
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 87
PREPARED BY:
. CIP AL PLANNER
z:~~s-
~V,
REVIE'WED BY:
~AL
RAY LLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
~~
SuSAN MURRAY, AICP, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
2.~611"\&:
~
CX;/71o S-
DATE'
c52!7 f,,_
~
Tentatively scheduled for the April 12, 2005 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
RUSSELL A. BUDD, CHAIRMAN
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LA.NDINGS PUD
9 of 15
cepe MTG. 3/3/05
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 87
REZONE FINDINGS
PETITION PUDZ-03-AR-4493
Section 10.03.05 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report and
recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners shall show
that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the
following, where applicable:
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives & policies of
the Future Land Use Map and the elements ofthe Growth Management Plan.
The subject property is located within the Activity Center # 6 Residential Density Band. The density
permitted within the Santa Barbara Landings PUD is consistent with the FLUE as currently provided
in the Growth Management Plan by Policy 2.5, 6.1, and the Density Rating System. Therefore, this
petition is Consistent by Policy.
2. The existing land use pattern;
The property to the north and west is zoned Berkshire Lakes POO and developed as commercial, and
single-family and multiple-family residential. The property to the east is zoned Plantation POO and
developed with single-family and multiple-family residential. The property to the south is zoned
Bembridge PUD and is developed with a public elementary school.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
The Santa Barbara Landings PUD parcel is of sufficient size that it will not result in an
isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also consistent with expected land uses
by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE ofthe GMP.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
The Santa Barbara Landings PUD is of sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also consistent with expected land uses by
virtue of its consistency with the FLUE.
EXHIBIT " A"
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD
10 of15
cepe MTG, 3/3/05
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 87
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment
necessary.
The subject property is located within the Activity Center #6 Residential Density Band. The
Density Rating System of the GMP discretionarily provides for a "Density Bonus" for propenies
within this area if the petition is compatible to the surrounding propenies and meets specific criteria
listed in the GMP, The subject property meet criteria #2 Proximity to Mixed Use Activity Center, #4
Residential- Infill, #5 Roadway Access, and #7 Transportation Concurrency Management Area
(TCWLA).
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions within the neighboring properties
due to the project's consistency with the GMP and compatibility with neighboring properties. The
proposed dwelling units will consist of four-dwelling units per building and be of similar construction
and design as the existing buildings on the subject property. The proposed rezone will have no
significant impact on any adopted level of service standard.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of
the development, or otherwise affect public safety.
Evaluation of this project took into account the requirement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the
Transportation Element and Policy 6.1 of the Future Land Use Element of the GMP and was found
consistent. The proposed change will result in an overall 430 in daily trips within the Santa Barbara
Landings PUD,
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The Land Development Code specifically provides the development standards that are designed to
reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. New development in and of itself is not supposed to
increase flooding potential on adjacent property over and above what would occur without
development. In summary, every project approved in Collier County involving the utilization of land
for some land use activity is scrutinized and required to mitigate all sub-surface drainage generated by
developmental activities as a condition of approval. This project was reviewed for drainage
relationships and design and construction plans are required to meet County standards as a condition
of approval.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
All projects in Collier County are subject to the development standards that are unique to the zoning
district in which it is located. These development standards and others apply generally and equally to
all zoning districts (i.e. open space requirement, corridor management provisions, etc.) were designed
to ensure that light penetration and circulation of air does not adversely affect adjacent areas.
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD 11 of 15 ccpe MTG. 3/3/05
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 19 of 87
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area.
Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning, however zoning by itself mayor
may not affect values, since value determination by law is driven by market value. The mere fact that
a property is given a new zoning designation or amendment mayor may not affect value. However,
staff is of the opinion that this petition will not adversely affect property values based on the projects
consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
The undeveloped properties nearby the proposed PUD should not be affected by the requested
amendment in that the project provides a landscape buffer, provides an area dedicated for
conservation/preserves, and is consistent with the approved zoned projects in the area.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasting with the public welfare. .
The proposed rezone to PUD complies with the Growth Management Plan, which is a public policy
statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said plans. In light of this fact the
proposed PUD does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further
determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public
interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
The subject property has been developed with 248 multiple-family residential dwelling units within
the regulations of the Residential Multiple-family-6 (RMF-6) zoning district. The petition proposes
to utilize the "Density Bonus" criteria of the Density Rating System of the GMP for an additional 43
residential dwelling units.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
County .
The proposed PUD is designed in a manner that is compatible with surrounding and approved
residential property in size and scale. It is also consistent with the FLUE of the Growth Management
Plan.
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use
in districts already permitting such use.
There are many sites which are zoned to accommodate the proposed development. This is not the
determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a rezoning decision. The determinants of
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTABARBARA LANDINGS PUD
12 of is
cepe MTG. 3/3/05
Agenda Item No. Be
. . 'th II I fth GMP 'b'l' d f' fr May 10, 200S
zomng are consIstency WI a e ements 0 e , compah I lty, a equacy 0 ill ~W(bMp to
some extent the timing of the action and all of the above criteria.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which
would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed, zoning classification.
Preservation areas have been identified on the Conceptual Master Plan. Additionally, the owner has
agreed to revegetate portions of the property to enhance native vegetation
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Pla.n
and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities
Ordinance, as amended.
A multi-disciplined team responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP has reviewed this
petition and they have found it consistent with the GMP, The conditions of approval have been
incorporated into the POO document. Staff reviews for adequacy of public services and levels of
service determined that required infrastructure meets with GMP established relationships.
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD
13 of 15
cepe MTG, 3/3/05
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 87
FINDINGS FOR PUD
PUDZ-03-AR- 4493
Section 2.7.3.2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Planning Commission to
make a fmding as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the following criteria:
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation
to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
Jurisdictional reviews by County staff support the manner and pattern of development proposed for
the subject property. Development conditions contained in the Santa Barbara Landings PUD
document give assurance that all infrastructures will be developed consistent with County regulations.
Any inadequacies that require supplementing the PUD document will be recommended to the
Planning Commission and the BCC as conditions of approval by staff. Recommended mitigation
measures will assure compliance with Level of Service relationships as prescribed by the GMP.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may
relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance
of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the Santa Barbara Landings PUD application provide evidence of unified
control. The PUD document makes appropriate provisions for continuing operation and maintenance
of common areas.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
The subject petition has been found consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the GMP.
The Santa Barbara Landings PUD proposes an additional 43 residential dwelling units, for a
maximum of291 residential dwelling units that are consistent with the GMP (See Staffreport).
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
The adopted PUD, including all the attendant buffering, land use locational criteria, and other
compatibility development requirements reasonably assure the project will be constructed with
internal and external compatibility addressed.
EXHIBIT "B"
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD
14 of 15
CCPC MTG. 3/3/05
Agenda Item No, Be
May 10, 2005
Page 22 of 87
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
As provided in Section IV - Preserve "P" Areas and Subsection 5.10 - Environmental of the PUD
Document, the amount of open space set aside by this project is consistent with the provisions of the
Land Development Code.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The proposed Santa Barbara Landings POO will not adversely impact the timing or sequence of
development that is currently allowed in the area. Furthermore, the adopted concurrency requirements
ensure that further LOS degradation is not allowed or the LOS deficiency is corrected.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
Ability, as applied in this context, implies supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal
system, potable water supplies, characteristics of the property relative to hazards, and capacity of
roads, is supportive of conditions emanating from urban development.
8. Conformity with POO regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations
in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
Staff analysis indicates that the Santa Barbara Landings PUD conforms to the PUD regulations.
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS POO
15 of 15
cepe MTG. 3/3/05
-
J. ...... J. .
RE_SUBMrAclellga Item No, Be
, TTAUv1ay 10,2005
PUDZ-2003-AR-4:l~ 23 of 87
PROJECT #2003040038
DATE: 1/20/04
FRED REISeHL
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR:
. ~UD REZONE
OPun TO PUD REZONE
Petition No.:
Date Petition Received:
Commission District:
Planner Assigned:
ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF
1. General Information:
,
Name ofApplicant(s) Blue Bell-Meridian Partners
Applicant's Mailing Address 1166 Dimock: Lane
City Naples
State Florida Zip 34110-0919
Applicant's Telephone #
Fax #
Applicant's E-Mail Address:
Name of Agent D, Wavne Arnold
Firm O. Grady Minor & Associates. P .A.
Agent's Mailing Address 3800 Via Del Rev
City Bonita Springs
State FL
Zip 34134
Agent's Telephone # 239-947-1144
Fax # 239-947-0375
COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING SERVICES/CURRENT PLANNING
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FL 34104
PHONE (941) 403-2400 / FAX (941) 643-6968
02127103 ADulleatlon For PubHe Hearln2 For PUD Rezone
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
* Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself according1'*ge 24 of 87
and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations.
Complete the following for all Association(s) affiliated with this petition. (Provide additional
sheets if necessary)
Name of Master Association:
Mailing Address
City
State FL Zip
Name of Civic Association:
Mailing Address
City
State FL Zip
2 . Disclosure of Interest Information:
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDNIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety,
tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well
as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Name and Address
Blue Bell Meridian Partners
Percentage of Ownership
100%
02127/03 AnDIic:ation For Public Be.1imo: For PUn Rezone
Agenda Item No. 8C
May 10,2005
Page 25 of 87
b. lfthe property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and
the percentage of stock owned by each.
.1
!
Name and Address, and Office
Percentage of Stock
c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with
the percentage of interest.
Name and Address
Percentage of Interest
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the
name of the general and/or limited partners.
Name and Address
A.G. Roode
Alan T. Schiffirum
Peter Gulick
Peter Cross
David Greiden
Mike Pashley
Percentage of Ownership
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.3
e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a
Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers
below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
Date of Contract:
02127103 ADoRation For Pabnc Hearln2 For PUD Rezone
f.
Agenda Item No, Be
May 10, 2005
If tin. 1 . 1 add. . na1 .Page,260J,$7
any con gency cause or contract terms mvo ve ltiO parties; 11St l1ll
individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust.
Name and Address
g. Date subject property acquired (X) leased (): 2002 Term oflease ---YI"s./mos.
If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: _ and date option
terminates: -' or anticipated c1osingdate_.
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur
subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the :final public hearing,
it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behal~ to submit a
supplemental disclosure of interest form.
3. Detailed let!al description of the property coveredbv the application: (If space is
inadequate, attach on separate page,) If request involves change to more than one zoning
district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. Applicant
shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months.
maximum 1" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre-application meeting.
NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If
,/ questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey
may be required.
Section: 04
Township: 50
Range: 26
Lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Plat Book:
Page #: _ Property I.D.#:
Metes & Bounds Description:
4. 'Size ofpropertv: 2.746 ft. X 667.30 ft. = Total Sq. Ft. 1 '831 '582 Acres :t41.61
5. Address/2enerallocation of subiect property: 193 Santa Clara Drive. Southeast
comer of Radio Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard
6.
PUD District (LDC 2.2.20.4):
[8J Residential 0 Community Facilities
D Commercial 0 Industrial
02/27/03 Auulicatlon For Public Hearin.l! For PUD Rezone
. , 7.' Adiacent zonine and land use:
Zoning Land Use
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 27 of 87
N PUD
Berkshire Lakes
SPUD
Bembridge
E PUD
Plantation
WPUD
Berkshire Lakes
Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property'? If
so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If Space is inadequate,
attach on separate page).
Section:
Township: Range:
Lot:
Block: Subdivision:
Plat Book:
Page #: _ Property 1.0.#:
Metes' & Bounds Description:
-.g. Rezone Request: This application is requesting a rezone from the RMF-6
zoning district(s) to the PUD zoning district(s).
Present Use of the Property: Multiple Family Residential
Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Multiple Family Residential
Original PUD Name:
Ordinance No.:
9. Evaluation Criteria: Pursuant to Section 2.7.2.5 AND Section 2.7.3.2.5 of the Collier
County Land Development Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning
Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of C01.mty
Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below.
Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the
criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the
request.
02/27103 ADDDcation For Public Heariul!: For PUD Rezone
PUD REZONE APPLICATION
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Agenda Item No, Be
May 10, 2005
Page 28 of 87
This completed checklist is to be submitted with application packet!
Requirements #of Required Not
Conies Reauired
1. Completed ApplicationIPUD documents 24* X
2. Copy of Deed(s) and list identifying Owner(s) and all 2* X
Partners if a Corporation ,
3. Completed Owner/Agent Affidavit, Notarized 2* X
4. Pre-application notes/minutes 24* X
5. Conceptual Site Plans 24* X
6. Environmental Impact Statement -(:EIS) 4
7. Aerial Photograph - (with habitat areas identified) 5* X
8. Completed Utility Provisions Statement (with required 4 X
attachments and sketches)
9. Traffic Impact Statement - (TIS) 4 X
10. Historical & Archaeological Surveyor Waiver 4 X
Application
11. Copies of State and/or Federal Permits ' 4 X
12. Architectural Renderin~ of Proposed Structure(s) 4 X
13. Pre-Application Fee, Application Fee and Data - X
Conversion Fee Check shall be made payable to Collier
County Board of County Commissioners
14. An electronic version of the PUD on a disk as part of the X
submittal packet,
15. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING: X
APPLICA nON SUBMITTAL: Copy of Affidavit
attesting that all property owners, civic associations
and property owner associations were notified. Copy of
audio/video recording of public meeting. Written
account of meetin~.
16. Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement 4 X
includin~ ail Applications and Exhibits.
17. Boundary Survey (no more than 6 months old) 5 X
18. OTHER REQUIREMENTS:
* Documents required for Long-Range Planning Review "'I additional copy if for affordable housing
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in
this su~mitt~ pac~ge. I understand that failure t~o. elude all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of
pro=ng~...~-
Januarv7.2004
Agent! Applicant Signatw'e Date
02/27/03 A1JDlication For Public Hearin2 For PUD Rezone
Agenda Item No, 8C
May 10, 2005
Page 29 of 87
Rezone Findings
. PETITION PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
Section 2.7.2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report and
recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners shall
show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation
to the following, where applicable.
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives,
policies, Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management
Plan;
The property is located within a density band as identified on the Future Land Use
Map. Specific density provisions are established in the Growth Management
Plan, and the POO document contains appropriate references assuring compliance
with the density rating system of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed
density is within the permitted density of the Growth Management Plan.
2. The existing land use pattern;
The subject property is located at the intersection of Radio Road and Santa
Barbara Boulevard. Properties to the west across Santa Barbara Boulevard are
. zoned and developed with general commercial and residential uses. Properties to
the east and north are zoned POO and are developed with single-family and multi-
family homes. The proposed addition of 43 dwelling units is conSistent with the
permitted density.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts;
The proposed POO borders land that is zoned for residential uses in the form of a
PUD, therefore, the subject site will not create an isolated district.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to
existing conditions on the property proposed for change;
The proposed district boundaries are logically drawn since they are consistent
with the Growth Management Plan.
RE~St.JBMITT AL
PUD?;-2003-AR_4493
PROJECT #2003040038
. DATE: 1/20/04
, FRED REISCHL
F:\JOB\SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS\Re:zone Findings,doc
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 30 of 87
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
amendment necessary;
The site is designated for residential uses, and the applicant intends to develop the
property with a combination of rental apartment and for-sale affordable housing
unit types. The demand for affordable housing is well documented and the
additional units are solely for qualifying affordable home buyers.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in
the neighborhood;
No adverse impacts to nearby residential uses will result from the proposed PUD
rezoning. This PUD contains provisions for bufferiD.g and building setbacks,
which are consistent with surrounding properties.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic
congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding
land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic,
including activity during construction phases of the development, or
otherwise affect public safety.
The Transportation Services Division has reviewed the proposed PUD and has
incorporated appropriate language into th~ PUD document, which renders the
PUD compatible with surrounding uses and the Traffic Circulation Element. No
level of service impacts result from this project. Therefore, the proposed PUD
will not excessively increase traffic congestion.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem;
The project will be reviewed and approved subject to requirements of Collier
County and the South Florida Water Management District. The PUD document
incorporates appropriate references to insure that no adverse drainage conditions
will result from the proposed development.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent
areas;
The proposed residential uses will be required to meet building setbacks and two-
story height restrictions. When meeting these requirements, light and air will not
; be reduced to adjacent properties.
F:\JOB\SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS\Re:wne Findings.doc
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 31 of 87
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the
adjacent area;
This site is adjacent to other residential and potential residential uses. Given the
required building and development standards, and the shared use with rental
apartments no diminution of property values is anticipated.
11 Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or
development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations;
The development of adjacent properties, in accordance with existing regulations,
will not be affected.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare;
If the proposed rezone is determined by the Board of County Commissioners to
be consistent with the Growth Management Plan, the proposed change will not
constitute a grant of special privilege.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in
accordance with existing zoning;
Under the existing conventional zoning, the addition of the proposed 43 housing
units could not be constructed. The PUD rezoning will permit the property to
develop the additional dwellings, consistent with IDC and Growth Management
Plan requirements.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the
neighborhood or the County;
The request is consistent with the Growth Management Plan, and is therefore,
within the needs of the community. The Plan limits the site to a maximum of 43
additional units and is of a scale appropriate for the surrounding area.
15. Whether is it impossible to f'md other adequate sites in the County for the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
It is not impossible to find other sites in Collier County; however, the petitioner
wishes to construct affordable housing on this parcel to supplement the rental
apartments currently on the site.
F:'JOB\SANT A BARBARA LANDINGS\Re.zone FindingB,doc
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 32 of 87
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration
which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of
potential uses under the proposed zoning classification.
Preservation areas have been identified. on the Conceptual Master Plan.
. Additionally, the owner has agreed to revegetate portions of the property to .
enhance native vegetation.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities
and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier
County Growth Management Pian and as dermed and implemented through
the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended.
The Site Development Plan will be reviewed for compliance with the Levels of
Service required for public facilities in the area.
F:IJOB\SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS\Rezone Findings,doc
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 33 of 87
PUD FINDINGS
PETITION PUDZ-2003-AR-4493
Section 2.7.3.2.5. of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report and
recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners be
supported by the following findings, where applicable:
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed
in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding area, traffic
and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
The property is designated for residential in the Growth Management Plan. The
site is located at the intersection of two arterial roadways and is well suited for the
proposed affordable housing and rental apartment uses.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed
agreements, contract, or other, instruments, or for amendments in those
proposed, particularly as they may related to arrangements or provisions to
be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of soch areas and
facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
The petitioner has provided evidence that the PUD is under unified control.
3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the
Growth Management Plan.
Staff analysis indicates that the Santa Barbara Landings PUD is consistent with
the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan.
4. The internal and external compatibility of the proposed uses, which
conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions
on design, and buffering and screening requirements.
Staff analysis indicates that the PUD is compatible, both internally and externally,
with the proposed uses and with the existing surrounding uses.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to
serve the development.
The PUD document and conceptual master plan make specific provisions for open
space and preservation areas consistent with the Growth Management Plan and
Land Development Code, '
F:IJOB\SANTA BARBARA LANDlNGS\Rczonc Findings.doc
Agenda Item No, Be
May 10, 2005
Page 34 of 87
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the
adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The PUD is required to meet concurrency requirements at the time of Site
Development Plan approval.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
The site is not designed, nor intended to provide for expansion.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such
modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least
equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
Staff analysis indicates that the Santa Barbara Landings PUD conforms to the
PUD regulations.
F:\JOB\SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS\Rcmne Findings.doc
Agenda Item No. 8C
May 10, 2005
Page 35 of 87
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST
1. NAME OF APPUCANT: Blue Bell-Meridian Partners
2. MAILING ADDRESS: C/O Alan T, Schiffman. 1166 Dimock Lane
CITY Naples
STATE Florida
ZIP 34110-0919
3. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): 177 Santa Clara Drive
4. LEGAL DESCRlPTION:
Section: 04
Township: 50
Range: 26
Lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Plat Book
Page #:
Property I.D.#: 00400200002
Metes & Bounds Description: West Y2 of west Y2 of northwest quarter of Section 4.
Township 50S. Range 26E.less North 50 feet.
5, TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED (Check applicable system):
a. COUNTY UTllJTY SYSTEM [8]
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM 0
c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM 0
PROVIDE NAME
d. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT D
(OPD capacity)
e, SEPTIC SYSTEM 0
6.
TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED:
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL)
f2J
D
o
D
02/27/03 ADDHc:adoll For Pablil: Reartal! For PUD Rezone
p~Zr2003-AJt-4493
PROJECT #2003040038
DATE: 7/31/03
FRED REISClIL
7.
TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED: 74
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 36 of 87
8, PEAK AND AVERAGE DAILY DEMANDS:
A. WATER-PEAK 25,000 GPD AVERAGE DAILY 11.400 GPD
B. SEWER-PEAK 25.000 GPD AVERAGE DAILY 11,400 GPD
9. IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER
SYSTEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE
REQUIRED: January 2005.
1 O. NARRATIVE STATEMENT: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic
drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding
the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then
percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a
professional engineer.
11. COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the project is
located within the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written
notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier Colinty Utilities the
water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion
of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances
in effect at the at time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable
system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities
Division prior to the issuance of building pennits by the County. If applicable, the
statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility
easements for serving the water and sewer systems.
12, STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS:
Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to
receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a
statement from that provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project
shall be provided,
Utility Provision Statement RJM 10/17/97
02/27103 ADDlicatloD For Public Hearlnl! For PUD Rezone
'() lO I'-
.-..-, 0 CO
0_
NO
-at-
E"'-C')
aJ >. aJ
~(\j
-;;28:
"0
c
aJ
OJ
<(
. .
~ ..
~ ~ I
1111.11 I l!:l Q. I
! n H HU . J ~. ~:c i
, I J << ~ i i I~
II '~~ ~
,II II ii! I ~ II
:a
~
,~
d
j
I~
d
II .
~I
-d
~, j !!!
~I:I ~Ir
~~ill :t"
!jl, ;,11
~~ .1
<:Y
:~il~
I qf"
n l! ~
..
f
!
f
III!!
I
wi 1111:1'
Ilill. ':1
Ii' ~ I!.~ I
;;!liU ili'!1
it- - :'"~ . ;!KI Ii ~' n
dl M'ss:m:n toOl:ILtli.O 'drlM dlollO 'llMp'd~O\WV9 va VJ.NVs\S :0
--
Agenda Item No. Be
AFFIDAVIT May 10, 2005
Page 38 of 87
We/I, Blue Bell-Meridian Partners being first duly sworn, depose and say that well am/are
is the owner of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed
hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest
information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this
application, are honest and true to the best of my knowledge and belief I understand that the
information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this
form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered Public hearings will not be
advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been
submitted.
As property owner, '~Ve/l further authorize Q. Gradv Minor & Associates, P A
our/my representative in any matters regarding this Petition.
to act as
~erty Owner
A 1-411I T: 1 c..1./,~.cd
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
Signature of Property Owner
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 23 day of fT't ( . 20~ by
A/qy, r ~c.htrh+u"..., who is personally known to me or has produce
- as identification.
State of Florida
County of Collier
f~
A, ADAM l YSlAK
NotBlY Pubflc, Slale of Florida
My comm. expires June 25. 2006
No. DO 129239
/I 4da..... Lv:r/ak.
(print, Type, or Stamp Cdmmissioned
Name of Notary Public)
Prno~2003-AUR-4493
PROJECT #2003040038
DATE: 7/31/03
FRED REISCHL
() l() r--
_aCXl
a_
Na
--6~
E...... aJ
<P>-OJ
== co ro'
ro:2:ci..
-g
aJ
Ol
~
f!l
1!'
eJ
~
~
~
I
IS 0-
I <X:
~
W
!-
-
(j)
!
"
i C')
~ 0)
v
i v
I
a::
c(
I
C')
0
0
N
I
:<1\'3IIDJ.Jllt{ / ~ N
0
- ::l
a..
"*'z
0
:l II I l-
Nn I-
w
~I :: n~! a..
a..
<X:
~
z
< 0
S~ ~ '"
;j
-
I-
<X:
U
0
...J
J
I
~
::l
~
~Il
~~ 1l
I;
~ ~
~
~Ji
l<~!i
I
II. ~ aJ,.V.LIIiUNI
~ I
~B
l'!
Ul!)!'-
COOCXl
0_
ON 0
...,. -0
-::~~
..... (l)
8>'0)
~(1)~
-:2 '"
(1J 0-
-;2
Q
OJ
<(
,
z
,
~
I~
*.
~~
il
I
!
i
i
~
I\'
!~
8
~~
~
.
HU B~n
:: ~f! ~~~~
~ . ~I ""
~ r!
in ! t ..
< g . .
15 t~j'
~ .., ~ e Ie os
~.. ~ = I
'"
~
z
'"
.:
~
del I
I~el~~
ili~liE
ti~~~i~
~f~h~
~;~id
~ !~hil
~.t
I
i II!I
i-Ii
d~i
I .
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 41 of 87
ORDINANCE NO, 05-_
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS
AMENDED, THE COLLlER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSNE ZONING REGULA TrONS
FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS;
BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN
DESCRffiED REAL PROPERTY FROM "RMF-6" TO "RPUD"
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO BE KNOWN AS
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD TO ADD 43 MIXED RESIDENTIAL
DWELLING UNITS TO THE 248 EXISTING DWELLING UNITS FOR A
TOTAL OF 291 DWELLING UNITS LOCATED ON SANTA CLARA
DRNE AT THE INTERSECTION OF SANTA BARBAR....... BOULEVARD
AND RADIO ROAD, IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 41.6", ACRES;
AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTNE DATE.
WHEREAS, D, Wayne Arnold, AICP, ofQ, Grady Minor & Associates, and Richard D, Yovanovich,
Esq., of Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson, representing Blue Bell-Meridian Partners, petitioned the Board of
County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 4, Township 50 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "RMF-6" to "RPUD" Residential Planned Unit
Development to be known as Santa Barbara Landings PUD to add 43 mixed residential dwelling units to the
248 existing dwelling units for a total of 291 dwelling units in accordance with the Santa Barbara Landings
PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, The appropriate zoning
atlas map or maps; as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land
Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly,
SECTION TWO:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State,
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,
this _ day of
,2005,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLlER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
BY:
FRED W, COYLE, CHAIRMAN
D~GHTE,BROCK,CLERK
Approved as to Form
and Legal Sufficiency
Patrick G. White
Assistant County Attorney
PUDZ-2003-AR-4493/MJDlsp
Page 1 of 1
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
41.6:1:: Acres Located in Section 04, Township 50 S, Range 26 E
Collier County, Florida
PREPARED FOR:
Blue Bell-Meridian Partners
1166 Dimock Lane
Naples, Florida 34110-0919
PREPARED BY:
Richard D. Y ovanovich, Esq.
Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
And
D. Wayne Arnold, AICP
Q. Grady Minor & Associates
3800 Via del Rey
Bonita Springs, FI 34134
DATE FILED
DATE APPROVED BY CPCC
DATE APPROVED BY BCC
ORDINANCE NUMBER
EXHIBIT "A"
Santa Barbara PUD (CCPe 3-25"()5)
3/18/05
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 42 of 87
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 43 of 87
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLE
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 11
SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY
OWNERSHIP AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION I-I
SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS II-I
SECTION III RESIDENTIAL "R" DEVELOPMENT AREA III-I
SECTION IV PRESERVE"P"AREA IV-I
SECTION V DEVELOPMENTCO~TMENTS V-I
Agenda,BCCAGENDA,10925 3/18/05
LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES
EXHIBIT A
CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN
EXHIBIT B
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
EXHIBIT C
LOCA nON MAP
EXHIBIT D
BOUNDARY SURVEY
TABLE I
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Agenda,BCCAGENDA, I 0925
3/18/05
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 44 of 87
III-3
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 45 of 87
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
Blue Bell-Meridian Partners intends to create a Residential Planned Unit Development on
approximately 41.6:1: acres ofland located in Section 04, Township 50 S, Range 26 E, Collier
County, Florida. Approximately 6.3 acres of the property is encumbered with a 100' wide
roadway easement for Santa Barbara Boulevard, making the net site approximately 35.3 acres.
The name of the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be Santa Barbara
Landings RPUD. The development of the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD will be in compliance
with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as established in the Growth
Management Plan. The development will be consistent with the policies of the land
development regulations adopted under the Growth Management Plan and applicable regulations
for the following reasons:
1. The subject property is located within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential
Sub-District, as identified on the Future Land Use Map.
2. The density provided for in the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD complies with the Density
Rating System contained in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management
Plan. The subject property is located within the residential density band, which extends
from the Mixed-use activity center located at the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard
and Davis Boulevard. The density permissible is 4 dwelling units per acre. Up to 3
dwelling units per acre may be added within the density band, bringing the permissible
base density to 7 dwelling units per acre.
Base density
Density band
Maximum permitted density
Requested density
+
4.0dulacre
3.0 dulacre
7.0 dulacre
7.0 dulacre (291 units)
At the time of the rezoning application, 248 multiple-family dwellings exist on the site.
The subject rezoning will add a maximum of 43 additional dwelling units for a maximum
total of 291 dwelling units. All property within the RPUD boundary shall be utilized in
calculating the project density.
3. The project development is compatible and complementary to existing and future
surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE).
4. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with the applicable land development
regulations as required in Objective 3 of the FLUE, except as may be modified in this
PUD document
5. All fmal local development orders for this project are subject to the Collier County
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance as required in Objective 2 of the FLUE.
Agcnda,BCCAGENDA,l0925
3/18/05
ii
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 46 of 87
6. The design of Santa Barbara Landings RPUD protects the function of the existing
drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as required in Objective
1.5 of the Drainage Sub-Element ofthe Public Facilities Element.
7. This project shall be subject to applicable Sections of the LDC at the time of
development order approval, except as otherwise provided herein.
Agenda.BCCAGENDA.l0925
3/18/05
iii
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 47 of 87
SECTION I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION
1.1 PURPOSE
Section I sets forth the location and ownership of the property, and describes the existing
conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name Santa
Barbara Landings RPUD.
1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The subject property being 41.6 acres more or less, is described as:
The west half (W. 'li) of the west half (W. 'li) of the northwest quarter (N.W, Y-t) of
Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, all being situated in Collier County,
Florida, less the north 50 feet thereof.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD.
1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
The property is currently owned by Blue Bell-Meridian Partners,
1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
A. The project is located in Section 04, Township 50, Range 26 and is generally
bordered on the north by Radio Road, on the east by Plantation PUD; on the south
by Bembridge PUD on the west by Santa Barbara Boulevard,
B. The zoning classification of the subject property at the time of RPUD application
is RMF -6.
C. According to FEMAlFIRM Map Panel Number 120067 415 D, dated June 3,
1986, the property is located within Zone X.
D. Soils on the site generally include Hallandale fine sand and Boca, Rivera,
Limestone Substratum and Copeland fine sand depressional.
E. Existing vegetation on the site consists of melaleuca, Brazilian Pepper, palmetto
prairie, pine flatwoood, cypress, Cabbage Palm and disturbed lands. Wetland
areas have been heavily impacted by melaleuca.
F. According to the Collier County Drainage Atlas, the site is located in the Lely
Canal Basin. The conceptual water management plan is depicted in the Surface
Water Management Report, which accompanied the rezone application submittal.
C:\AdLib cXpn:ss\Work\Agcnda.BCCAGENDA.l0925.doc 2/14/05 1-1
Agenda Item No. 8C
May 10, 2005
Page 48 of 87
1.5 SHORT TITLE
This Ordinance is known and cited as the "Santa Barbara Landings Residential Planned
Unit Development Ordinance."
c: \AdLib eXpress\ Work\Agcnda.BCCAGENDA.] 0925,doc
2/14/05
1-2
Agenda Item No, 8C
May 10, 2005
Page 49 of 87
SECTION II
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
2.1 PURPOSE
Section II delineates and generally describes the plan of development and identifies
relationships to applicable County ordinances, policies, and procedures,
2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
A. Santa Barbara Landings RPUD is a mixed-use residential project and will consist
of two development parcels and multiple preservation areas, Categories of land
uses include those for residential and preserve areas. The Residential areas are
designed to accommodate single-family attached, duplex and multiple family
dwellings. The overall project density is 7 dwelling units per acre and the
maximum units permitted in the RPUD shall be 291 units.
B. Exhibit "A" depicts the RPUD Master Plan. The RPUD Master Plan includes a
table that summarizes land use acreage, The location, size and configuration of
individual tracts shall be determined at the time of Preliminary and Final
Subdivision Plat approval.
2.3 COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES
A. Regulations for development of Santa Barbara Landings RPUD shall be in
accordance with the contents of this document, Planned Unit Development
District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land
Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of issuance
of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorize the
construction of improvements. Where these regulations fail to provide
developmental standards then the provisions of the most similar district in the
Land Development Code shall apply.
B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the
definitions set forth in the Land Development Code in effect at the time of
building permit application.
C. Unless modified, waived or excepted from this RPUD Document or associated
exhibits, the provisions of other sections of the land development codes, where
applicable, remain in full force and effect with respect to the development of the
land that comprises this RPUD,
D. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a
concurrency review under the provisions of Chapter 6, Adequate Public Facilities,
of the Land Development Code.
Agenda,BCCAGENDA.l0925
3/18/05
II-I
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 50 of 87
2.4 LAND USES
Land uses are generally depicted on the RPUD Master Plan, Exhibit A. The specific
location and size of individual tracts and the assignment of square footage or units shall
be determined by the developer at the time of site development plan approval,
preliminary subdivision plat approval, or final subdivision plat approval subject to the
provisions of Chapter 10 of the Collier County LOC.
2.5 USE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY
The Developer may utilize land within the rights-of-way within the RPUD for
landscaping, decorative entranceways, and unified signage. This utilization is subject to
review and administrative approval during the development review process by the
Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator for engineering and
safety considerations.
2.6 MODEL HOMES SALES OFFICE AND CONSTRUCTION OFFICE
A. Construction offices and other uses and structures related to the promotion and
sale of real estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions, parking areas, and signs,
shall be permitted principal uses throughout the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD.
These uses shall be subject to the requirements of Chapter 5 and Chapter 10 of the
LDC.
B. Model Homes may be permitted in multi-family and townhome buildings may be
utilized for wet or dry models, subject to the time frames specified in Chapter 5 of
the LDC.
2.7 CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO RPUD DOCUMENT OR RPUD MASTER
PLAN
Changes and amendments may be made to this RPUD Ordinance or RPUD Master Plan
as provided in Chapter 10 of the LOC. Minor changes and refinements as described
herein may be made by the Developer in connection with any type of development or
permit application required by LDC.
Agcnda.BCCAGENDA,1 0925
3/18/05
II-2
Agenda Item No, Be
May 10, 2005
Page 51 of 87
2,8 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS
A minimum of 30% of the project (12,48:f: acres) shall be devoted to usable open space.
2.9 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS
A minimum of three (3) acres of native vegetation shall be maintained on the subject site
through a combination of preservation of existing native vegetation and revegetation of
native vegetation. The areas of retained native vegetation and replanted native vegetation
are shown as Preserve areas on the Conceptual Master Plan, Exhibit A.
2.10 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE
One or more Property Owner's Association (POA) will provide common area
maintenance. The PDA, as applicable, shall be responsible for the operation,
maintenance, and management of the surface water and stormwater management systems
and preserves serving Santa Barbara Landings RPUD, in accordance with any applicable
permits from the South Florida Water Management District.
2.11 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
A. The Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage
ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or
redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership as set
forth in Chapter 2 of the LOC.
1. Individual Projects
a) Site Planning: Each distinct project within the RPUD will provide
an aesthetically appealing, identifiable path of entry for pedestrians
and vehicles. The orientation of buildings and structures will be
sensitive to adjacent land uses and the surrounding community.
b) Landscaping: Where applicable, plantings along public rights-of
way will be complimentary to streetscape landscaping.
2.12 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS
A. Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal
use throughout the RPUD, excluding preserves.
B. The maximum fence, wall or berm height internal to the RPUD shall be eight (8)
feet, not including those portions of walls incOlporated into project identification
signs. The maximum fence height shall be measured relative to the greater of the
crown of the adjacent roadway or the adjacent minimum finished floor, as
applicable. The eight (8') foot high precast wall shown on the conceptual master
Agcnda,BCCAGENDA,1 0925
3/18/05
1I-3
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 52 of 87
plan shall be constructed concurrent with development of the residential units in
tractB.
C. Perimeter Buffers abutting rights-of-way shall be permitted to deviate from the
required 20' wide Type D buffer, to permit a Type D buffer an average of 20' in
width, with no part of the buffer being less than 15' in width. The minimum area
for the combined buffers along Radio Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard shall be
66,129 square feet (1.52:1:: acres),
2.13 SIGNAGE
A. GENERAL
Signage shall be consistent with Section 5,06 of the LDC.
2.14 SUBSTITUTIONS TO SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS / DEVIATIONS
1. The Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to subdivision
improvement and utility design standards in accordance with Chapter 10 of the
LDC.
A. Chapter 6, Sidewalks, bike lanes and bike paths
1. Existing site constraints prohibit retrofitting of the site with sidewalks
meeting standards in Chapter 6 of the LDC.
2. A six (6) foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on only one (1) side of the
internal local or private roadway exceeding one thousand (1,000) feet in
length serving the project's additional 43-unit component.
3. An internal sidewalk connection from the southernmost development tract
(Tract B) to the existing pool/club area shall be provided at the time of
construction within Tract B.
4. The developer shall make payment-in-lieu of construction of the sidewalk
within Santa Barbara Boulevard, due to its programmed improvement in
the five-year work program.
B. Section 4.06,00, Landscaping, buffering and vegetation retention
1. Perimeter Buffers abutting rights-of-way shall be permitted to deviate
from the required 20' wide Type D buffer, to permit a Type D buffer an
average of 20' in width, with no part of the buffer being less than 15' in
width. The minimum area for the combined buffers along Radio Road and
Santa Barbara Boulevard shall be 66,129 square feet (1.52:1:: acres).
Agenda,BCCAGENDA,! 0925
3/18/05
11-4
Agenda Item No. 8C
May 10,2005
Page 53 of 87
C. Construction Standards Manual, Streets and access improvements
1. Construction Standards Manual, Street Right-of-Way Width
Street right-of-way width: The minimum right-of-way width to be utilized
for local streets and cul-de-sacs shall be forty (40) feet. Drive aisles
serving multi-family tracts shall not be required to meet this standard.
2. Construction Standards Manual, Dead-end Streets
Cul-de-sacs may exceed a length of one thousand (1,000) feet
3. Construction Standards Manual, Intersection Radii
Intersection radii: Street intersections shall be provided with a minimum
of a twenty five (25) foot radius (face of curb) for all internal project
streets and a thirty-five (35) foot radius for intersections at project
entrances.
2.15 GENERAL PERMITTED USES
A. Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the Santa
Barbara Landings RPUD except in the Preserve Areas. General pennitted uses
are those uses that generally serve the entire RPUD or distinct projects there
within.
B. General Permitted Uses:
1. Essential services as set forth under Chapter 2 of the LDC.
2. Water management facilities and related structures.
3, Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural
bank treatments.
4. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures.
5. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the
Developer and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants,
including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses.
6, Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms,
fences and walls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.12 of this
document.
7. Signage.
Agcnda,BCCAGENDA.I0925
3/18/05
II-5
Agenda Item No. 8C
May 10, 2005
Page 54 of 87
SECTION In
RESIDENTIAL "R" DEVELOPMENT AREAS
3.1 PURPOSE
Section III establishes permitted uses and development regulations for areas within the
Santa Barbara Landings RPUD that are designated Residential "R" on the RPUD Master
Plan.
3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
A. Areas designated as "R" on the RPUD Master Plan are designed to accommodate
multiple family residential types, recreational uses, essential services, and
customary accessory uses. Acreage is based on a conceptual design. Actual
acreage of the development and preserve areas shall be established at the time of
Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance
with the Collier County Land Development Code. Areas designated as "R"
accommodate internal roadways, open space, parks and amenity areas, lakes and
water management facilities, and other similar facilities that are accessory or
customary to residential development.
B. Areas designated as "R" are intended to provide a maximum of 291 dwelling
units.
3.3 PERMIITED USES AND STRUCTURES
A. Principal Uses and Structures
1. Single-family attached and detached.
2. Duplex and two-mmily.
3. Multiple-family.
4. Townhomes
B. Accessory Uses and Structures
1. Common indoor and outdoor recreational facilities.
2. Sales and leasing facilities.
3. Clubhouse, meeting rooms.
4. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted in
this area.
Agcnda,BCCAGENDA,l0925
3/18/05
III- ]
Agenda Item No, Be
May 10, 2005
Page 55 of 87
3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the "R"
Residential District.
B. Required Parlcing: Parking within the residential area shall be provided based on
the following standards:
1. Recreation Facilities - 2 per court, 1 per 600 square feet of building area,
1 per 200 square feet of pool water area, No additional parking shall be
required for outdoor playground facilities, Up to 10 parking spaces per
recreational facility may be directly loaded off a private roadway serving
the recreational area.
2. Temporary Model Sales Facility - mlmmum 6 parking spaces per
building. Parking for models or temporary sales facilities shall be
permitted to back directly onto private roadways serving the units.
C. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such
standards are not specified herein or within the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD,
shall be in accordance with the Land Development Code in effect at the time of
Site Development Plan approval. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards,
heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures.
D. Development standards for uses not specifically set forth in Table I shall be
established during the Site Development Plan Approval as set forth in Chapter 4
of the Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of the zoning
district which is most similar to the proposed use,
Agenda.BCCAGENDA.10925
3/18/05
III-2
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 56 of 87
TABLE I
SANTABARBARA LANDINGS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
"R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS
All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted
Permitted Uses and Single Zero Lot Duplex, Single Multi-Family
Standards Family Line Family Dwellings5
Detached Attached and
Townhouses
Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF NA NA
Minimum Lot Width 50' 40' NA NA
Minimum Lot Depth 100' 100' NA NA
Front Yard Setback 20'/23' 20'/23' 20'/23' 20'/23'
Side Yard Setback 6' 0' or 6' 0' or 6' 15'
Rear Yard Setback' 15' 15' 15' 15'
Santa Barbara Blvd.
R-Q-W Setback 20' 20' 20' 20'
Rear Yard Accessory
Setbac~ 10' 10' 10' ]0'
Preserve Setback"
Accessory 10' 10' 10' 10'
Principal 25' 25' 25' 25'
Maximum Zoned Building 2 Stories 2 Stories 2 Stories 2 Stories
Height or 30' or 30' or 30' or 30'
Distance Between ~ Detached
Principal Structures 12' 12' 12' 15'
Floor Area Min. (SF)
750 SF 750 SF 750 SF 750 SF
lFront yards shall be measured as follows;
A, If the p8l'Cel is SC1'Ved by a public right-{)f-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-{)f-way line,
B, If the parcel is SC1'Ved by a private road or access easement, setback is measured from the back of cmb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if
not embed), For multiple family buildings served by an unplatted driveway, no setback shall be required; however, adequate stacking shall
be provided to accommodate vehicular parl<ing. For tract B, front entry garage setback shall be a minimum of 23' from private row or back:
edge of sidewalk,
C, For structures with side or rear entry garages, the minimum front yard may be reduced to 12',
2Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lake, or open space (non-preserve) may be reduced to 0' feet; however, a
reduced building setback shall not reduce the width of any required landscape buffer, as may be applicable,
3For purposes of this Section, accessory stroctures shall include but not be limited to attached screen enclosures and roofed lanais,
4 A minimum building separation of twelve (12) feet between detached structures. Detached garages may be separated by a minimum often (10) feet,
S Attached single-family and multi-family structures within Tract B shall not exceed 4 dwelling wits per structure.
Agenda.BCCAGENDA,I0925
3/18/05
III-3
Agenda Item No, 8C
May 10, 2005
Page 57 of 87
SECTION IV
PRESERVE "P"AREAS
4.1 PURPOSE
Section IV establishes permitted uses and development regulations for areas within Santa
Barbara Landings RPUD that are designated as Preserve "P" on the RPUD Master Plan.
4.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Areas designated as "P" on the RPUD Master Plan are designed to accommodate natural
systems existing or created as preserves and limited water management uses and
functions,
4.3 PERMIITED USES AND STRUCTURES
A. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land
or water used, in whole or in part, subject to review and approval by local, state &
federal agencies as required, for other than the following:
B. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures
1, Boardwalks and nature trails (excluding impervious paved trails).
2. Water management facilities.
3. Any other preserve and related use which is comparable in nature with the
foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals determines to be
compatible in the Preserve Area.
4.4 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
A. Building setbacks shall be 20 feet from the RPUD boundary for any permitted
structure.
B. Maximum zoned height for any structure shall be 20'.
4.5 PRESERVE AREA ADJUSTMENTS
The proposed preserve areas depicted on the Santa Barbara Landings RPUD Master Plan
are intended to meet the native vegetation requirements of the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and the Collier County LDC. Adjustments may be made to the
location of the preservation areas at the time of preliminary plat or site development plan
approval based on jurisdictional agency permit requirements.
Approximately 6 acres of native vegetation exists on-site at the time of rezoning
application. Through retention of existing native vegetation and revegetation of open
Agcnda.BCCAGENDA,! 0925
3/18/05
N-t
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 58 of 87
spaces on-site, the developer shall provide a minimum of 3 acres of on-site native
vegetation, which shall consist of a minimum of 1.5 acres of retained vegetation and 1.5
acres of replanted and enhanced native vegetation.
Agcnda.BCCAGENDA,I0925
3/18105
IV-2
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 59 of 87
SECTION V
DEVELOPMENTCOMMITTMENTS
5.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the commitments for the development of this
project.
5.2 GENERAL
An facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with Final Site Development Plans,
Final Subdivision Plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations
applicable to this RPUD, in effect at the time of Final Plat, Final Site Development Plan
approval or building permit application as the case may be. Except where specifically
noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the official Comty Land
Development Code shall apply to this project even if the land within the RPUD is not to
be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the
commitments outlined in this document.
These developer conunitments will be enforced through provisions agreed to be included
in the declaration of covenants and restrictions or similar recorded instrument. Such
provisions must be enforceable by lot owners against the developer, it successors and
assigns, regardless of turnover or not to any property or homeowners' association.
The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the RPUD Master Plan and the
regulations of this RPUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be
agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is
subject to the commitments within this Agreement.
5.3 RPUD MASTER PLAN
A. Exhibit "A", RPUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is
conceptual in nature. Proposed area, lot or land use boundaries or special land use
boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent
approval phase such as Final Platting or Site Development Plan approval. Subject
to the provisions of Chapter 10 of the LDC, amendments may be made from time
to time.
5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT
A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the time limits
pursuant to Chapter 10 of the LDC,
B, Monitoring Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to
Chapter 10 of the LDC.
Agcnda.BCCAGENDA,l0925
3/18/05
V-I
Agenda Item No. 8C
May 10, 2005
Page 60 of 87
5.5 ENGINEERING
A. This project shall be required to meet all County Ordinances in effect at the time
final construction documents are submitted for development approval.
B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with
appropriate provisions of the LDC.
5.6 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), this project shall be designed for a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year
return frequency.
A. The project will be permitted with the South Florida Water Management District
and copies of the applicable permits will be provided to Collier County prior to
issuance of applicable County permits.
B. Existing lakes already constructed as of the effective date of this regulation shall
be allowed to continue to exist in accordance with cross sections shown on
Surface Water Management Plan, Exhibit "B". Any new lakes must meet the
requirements of the then current LDC.
5.7 UTILITIES
A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or
sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed,
conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance
No. 97-17, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations.
B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to
insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in
compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time approvals are
requested.
C. Water and wastewater systems shall be constructed in accordance with State of
Florida Laws and Collier County's Codes and Ordinances.
D. All construction plans, technical specifications and hydraulic design reports are to
be reviewed and approved in writing by the Engineering Services Department of
the Community Development and Environmental Services Division prior to
commencement of construction
E. Upon completion of construction, all water and wastewater systems within the
project shall be tested and must meet minimum County standards and
Agenda,BCCAGENDA,l0925
3/18/05
V-2
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 61 of 87
requirements. The system(s), or a portion thereof, that is found to meet the
requirements set forth in item #5 below, may then be conveyed to the County for
ownership and maintenance.
F. If County's utility system does not have access readily available to serve a project
within the County's service area, extensions to the County infrastructure may be
required All required extensions shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer,
fiscally and otherwise (time and schedule), unless such extension has been
previously defined in the County Water and/or Wastewater Master Plan. In such
case, the developer may negotiate an upsizing agreement with the County. If it is
determined by the County that neither of these two options are feasible, in interim
system may be considered.
G. Items on the following list shall be conveyed to the County for ownership and
maintenance upon approval from the Board of County Commissioners if they are
located within a County right-of-way or County Utility Easement (CUE), are in
compliance with the latest revision of the Collier County Utilities Standards and
Procedures Ordinance, and are connected to the County Water, Wastewater or
Reclaimed Systems:
1. Potable water lines 6" or larger, including water meters and bacldlow
devices that are not on fire lines.
2, Gravity wastewater lines 8" or larger.
3. Wastewater lift stations that are located within a CUE.
4. Force mains 4" or larger,
5. CUE's that are determined to be necessary to access and maintain utility
systems and structures.
6. Non-potable irrigation water lines 6" or larger, including the water meter
and bacldlow devices.
For potable and reclaimed water distribution systems that will not be conveyed to
the County, a master meter shall be required. Such systems shall be owned and
maintained by the applicant, his successor or assigns, from the customer side of
the master meter and bacldlow device or the check valve at the property line or
County Utility Easement limit. School and park developments are included in the
list of types of developments whose internal systems the applicant or assigns shall
be responsible to own and maintain.
H. Private lift stations shall conform to the same specifications that apply to public
lift stations, unless a Deviation from the Ordinance has been granted in advance
Agcnda,BCCAGENDA,l0925
3/18/05
V-3
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 62 of 87
and writing by the County Wastewater. The lift station Control Package shall
include an operable Telemetry Control System, as specified by County Standards.
1. The developer will pay all impact fees in accordance with the latest revision of the
Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, Code of Laws Section
74.303(d).
1. PUD's and DRI's shall have only one master pump station.
K. Lift station easement areas shall be designed to 30 feet by 30 feet, or twice the
wetwell depth by twice the wetwell depth, whichever is larger,
L. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 118, solid
waste disposal shall be required in the fonn of bulk containers service (garbage
dumpsters and/or compactors) for all commercial and industrial establishments,
unless authorization for alternative means of disposal is approved by the Public
Utilities Division. Bulk container service shall be required to all multi-family
projects not receiving curbside pickup. Solid waste disposal shall be required in
the form of curbside pickup for all units on the annual Mandatory Trash
Collection and Disposal Special Assessment Roll's. All individual units within a
deed-restricted area must have an enclosed location other than the residential
structure, such as a carport or garage for the storage of individual solid waste
containers, or as otherwise permitted in Section 5.03.04 of the LDC.
M. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 118, all
provisions and facilities for solid waste collection and disposal shall conform to
all portions of Section 5.03.04 (Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) of the latest
edition of the LOC.
5.8 TRAFFIC
The development of this RPUD Master Plan shall be subject to and governed by the
following conditions:
A. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be
in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of
Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards,
current edition, and the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD),
current edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as required
by the Collier county Land Development code (LDC).
B. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided at all access points. Access lighting
must be in place prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO).
C, Site-related improvements necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as
determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All
Agcnda.BCCAGENDA,l0925
3/18105
V-4
Agenda Item No. 8C
May 10,2005
Page 63 of 87
required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to the
issuance of the first CO.
D. Road impact fees shall be paid in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 01-
13, as amended, Code of Laws Chapter 74 and Chapter 6 and Chapter 10 of the
LDC, as it may be amended.
E. All work within Collier County rights-of-way or public easements shall require a
Right-of-way Permit.
F, All proposed median opening locations shall be in accordance with the Collier
County Access Management Policy (Resolution 01-247), as it may be amended,
and the LDC, as it may be amended. Collier County reserves the right to modify
or close any median opening existing at the time of approval of this RPUD which
is found to be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the public, Any such
modifications shall be based on, but are not limited to, safety, operational
circulation, and roadway capacity.
G. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right
in/right out condition at any access point. Neither will the existence of a point of
ingress, a point of egress or a median opening, nor the lack thereof, shall be the
basis for any future cause of action for damages against the County by the
developer, its successor in title, or assignee.
H, All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnections to
adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by
the developer and Collier Country shall have no responsibility for maintenance of
any such facilities.
I. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County right-
of-way or easement, compensating right-of-way, shall be provided without cost to
Collier County as a consequence of such improvement.
1. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control
device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right-of-way or
easement is determined to be necessary, the cost of such improvement shall be
borne by the developer and shall be paid to Collier County before the issuance of
the first CO.
5.9 PLANNING
Pursuant to Chapter 2 of the LDC, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or
other construction activity a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development
within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped
and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted.
Agenda,BCCAGENDA,l0925
3/18/05
V-5
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 64 of 87
5.1 0 ENVIRONMENTAL
A. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic-free) plan for
the site, shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and
approval prior to Final Site Development Plan/Construction Plan approval for all
parcels included on that project. All category 1 invasive exotic plants as defined
by the Florida Exotic Pest Council shall be removed in Preserve areas, and annual
removal (in petpetuity) shall be the responsibility of the property owner,
B. A minimum of (3.0 acres) of the on-site native vegetation shall be retained or
revegetated, consistent with Chapter 3 of the LDC as conceptually shown as
preserve areas on the Exhibit "A", Conceptual RPUD Master Plan.
C. Setbacks from preserves shall be as required in the Santa Barbara Landings
RPUD, Table 1.
D. All preserve areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation tracts or
easements on all construction plans and shall be so dedicated on all plats or
recorded as an easement for site plans pursuant to Section 704.06 of the Florida
Statutes, for plats and be dedicated to the project's homeowners' association or
like entity for ownership and maintenance responsibility, and to Collier County
with no responsibility for maintenance. All documentation necessary to record
conservation easements over the preserve areas shall be provided prior to the next
SDP approval for this RPUD.
E. This RPUD shall comply with the guidelines of the USFWS and FFWCC for
impacts to protected species. A habitat management plan for those species shall
be submitted to environmental review staff for review and approval prior to site
plan approval.
F. This RPUD shall be in compliance with the Growth Management Plan, and LDC,
except as may be modified herein, at the time of final development order
approval.
G. A preserve Management Plan shall be provided to environmental staff for
approval prior to site/construction plan approval identifYing methods to address
treatment of invasive exotic species, fire management and maintenance. A
SFWMD jurisdictional determination shall be shown on the site development
plan.
H. All approved agency permits shall be submitted pnor to final site
plan/construction plan approval.
I. A replanting plan for the re-created preserve areas shall be provided at the time of
next development order submittal. Perimeter berms shall be located outside of all
upland/wetland preserves.
Agenda,BCCAGENDA,l0925
3/18/05
V-6
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10,2005
Page 65 of 87
SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS PUD
DEVIATIONS AND JUSTIFICATIONS
1. Chapter 6, Sidewalks, bike lanes and bike paths
a) Existing site constraints prohibit retrofitting of the site with
sidewalks meeting standards in Chapter 6 of the LDC.
b) A five (5) foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on only one (1)
side of the internal local or private roadway exceeding one
thousand (1,000) feet in length serving the project's additional 43-
unit component.
c) An internal sidewalk connection from the southernmost
development tract (Tract B) to the existing pool/club area shall be
provided at the time of construction within Tract B.
d) The developer shall make payment-in-lieu of construction of the
sidewalk within Santa Barbara Boulevard, due to its programmed
improvement in the five-year work program,
Deviations have been proposed relating to sidewalks within the Santa
Barbara Landing PUD. A majority of the site has been previously
developed and cannot be retrofitted with dual sidewalks internal to
the site. Meetings with Transportation Staff resulted in an agreement
that sidewalks on one side of the internal street system were sufficient.
The developer further agreed to provide an internal pedestrian
connection linking the recreation tract with the newly proposed
development area of the project.
Although not a formal code deviation, the developer has agreed to
make a fee-in-lieu-of payment for sidewalk improvements on Santa
Barbara Boulevard. Constructing the sidewalk is not practical given
the County's proposed ROW improvements to Santa Barbara
Boulevard.
2. Construction Standards Manual, Street Right-of-Way Width
Street right-of-way width: The minimum right-of-way width to be utilized
for local streets and cul-de-sacs shall be forty (40) feet. Drive aisles
serving multi-family tracts shall not be required to meet this standard.
Streets and drive aisles shall meet applicable NFP A criteria, State Fire
Code NFPA - 13.5.2.2.
F:IJOB\SANT A BARBARA LANDINGS\Deviations.doc
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 66 of 87
Street right-of-way width: The minimum right-of-way width to be
utilized for local streets and cul-de-sacs shall be forty (40) feet.
The proposed 40' right-of-way width for internal street is sufficient to
support the required infrastructure for the newly proposed
development area of the PUD. This deviation has been previously
approved by Collier County.
3. Construction Standards Manual, Dead-end Streets
Cul-de-sacs may exceed a length of one thousand (1,000) feet.
The deviation for cul-de-sac lengths exceeding 1,000 feet has been
requested to provide flexibility in final subdivision design. Exceeding
1,000 feet in length for a cul-de-sac street will pose no life safety threats,
as the roadways will be designed to accommodate appropriate turning
radius for fire apparatus.
4. Construction Standards Manual, Intersection Radii
Intersection radii: Street intersections shall be provided with a minimum
of a twenty five (25) foot radius (face of curb) for all internal project
streets and a thirty-five (35) foot radius fOT intersections at projecteentrances.
This deviation request has been withdrawn.
F:VOB\SANT A BARBARA LANDINGS\Deviations,doc
Agenda Item No, 8C
2ND RE-SUBMITI'AL May W, 200~
PUDz..2003-AR-4493 Page 67 of 87
PROJECT #2003040038
DATE: 7/12/04
FRED RElSCHL
Prepared by:
Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A.
Civil Engineers: Land Surveyors: Planners
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs, Florida 34134
(941) 947-1144
(941) 947-0375 (F)
July 2004
~
~~~- 7//04
Norman J. biI~ P.E. ,'I I'
Florida RegiSfI::~tion No. 47116
....... .~ -..-
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 68 of 87
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PURPOSE: This application is a request for conceptual approval of a surface water management system
serving a 41.61-acre residential community. Excluding the right-of-way for Santa Barbara Blvd., the site
totals 35.49 acres.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed site is currently partially developed. The site was originally
developed in the late 1980's. All runoff moves generally to the south thru a series of pipes, drainage
structures and wet detention to the existing preserve, draining directly into the Santa Barbara Blvd. roadside
swale via an existing control structure.
PROPOSED FACILITIES: The proposed project will consist of a combination of the existing system, plus
an additional area for dry detention before it is discharged thru a control structure to the Santa Barbara Blvd.
roadside swale for water management.
A. DRAINAGE INFORMATION
1. The basin will consist of the existing 248-multi-family residential units, the proposed 43
additional multi-family units, the existing recreation facilities, lakes, and a preserve.
2. The wet season water table elevation and control elevation is 9.5' NGVD based on the proposed
roadway improvements for Santa Barbara Blvd and existing conditions. The dry detention areas
will have a bottom elevation of 10.5' N.G.V.D.
3. The following design storms were used for this basin:
. 10 Year, 1 day rainfall = 7.3 inches
· 25 Year, 1 day rainfall = 8.6 inches
. 100 Year, 1 day rainfall = 11.0 inches
4. The runoffhydrographs were created using the SFWMD Routing Model Cascade 2001 (Version
1.0) program.
5. Time of concentration (tc)
= 2(Total site area/640)0.5
= 2(35.49/640)0,5
= 0.47 hours
1_F'IOB\8ANfA BARBARA UNDING8\W A1'ERMAN\SWM REPORT....
Page 2 of6
Agenda Item No, 8C
May 10, 2005
Page 69 of 87
6. Stage/storage calculations:
Stage (FT, NGVD)
9,50 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0
Basin Land Use Areas
Wet Detention 3,40 3.40 3,40 3.40 3.40 3.40 3.40 3.40 3.40 3.40
Dry Detention 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Residential Development Area 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 8.50 9.25 12.58 12.58 12.58
Residential Open Space 0,00 0.00 4.50 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.50 15.00 16.26 16.26
On Site WetlandlPreserve 1.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Santa Barbara Landings Total 3.40 3.40 11.15 12.65 18.65 25.15 28.40 34.23 '35.49 35.49
Incremental Storage (Ac"'Ft) 0 1.7 3,64 5.95 7.83 10.95 13.39 15.66 17.44 17.76
Cumulative Storage (Ac"'Ft) 0 1.7 5.34 11.29 19.12 30.07 43.46 59.12 76.55 94.32
Note: AU storage values are in (lcre-feet. Open space (lreas tU'e tlSSumed to be linear between ekvflIion 9.5 and 13,5. The JHlVl!lllenI is assumed
to be full (It elevation II. 7 and includes curb find sidewalk.
7. Soil Storage
The average depth to the water table will be
= average site grade elevation - average site water table elevation
= 12.5-10.5
= 2.0 feet
From the soil storage table, with compaction and 2.0 feet to the water table, up to 1.88 inches
of moisture can be stored in the soil under pervious areas.
Compute available site wide soil storage, S
= soil storage available * pervious areas I total site area
= (1,88) * (19.51 ac) I (35.49 ac)
= 1.03" of soil storage = 5
Compute SCS Curve Number, CN
= 1 ooo/(S+ 10)
= 1000/(11.03)
= 90.7
8. Stage/discharge calculations.
The discharge calculations were perfonned by Cascade and are included in Attachment A.
F:IJOB'SANfA BARBARA LANDINGS\W A'J'ERMANISWM REPORT,doc
Page 3 of6
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 70 of 87
9. Surface Water Profiles and Runoff Peak Rates
25-YEAR 3-DAY 100- YEAR 3-DA Y
STORM * STORM **
STAGE (NGVD) 11.80 12.40
DISCHARGE (CFS) 2.11 0
*= Refer to modeling results in Exhibit 1.
**= Refer to modeling results in Exhibit 2.
The minimum road elevation in this basin will be 11.80. The minimwn existing road crown is 12.0.
The minimum finish floor elevation of the first habitable floor will be 12.4. The minimum existing
finish floor elevation on site is 13.49. This is equal to or greater than the Flood Insurance Rate Map
that shows this project in Zone X (per Community-Panel Number 120067 0415 D revised Jl.Ule 3,
1986) which is outside the 100 Year Flood Hazard area, but within the 500 Year Flood Area.
B. SITE DATA
Total Site/Drainage Basin 35.49 ac 100.00%
Impervious
Pavement/Curb/Sidewalk = 8.92 ac 25.13%
Building (Garage footprint) 3.66 ac 10.31 %
Dry Detention (at bottom) 0.25 ac 0.70%
Pervious
Open space 19.51 ac 54,97%
Note: Pleilse note tIuu due to rounding, arells and percentages ""'y not total lOO%.
C. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
Water quality must the greater of the following: first inch of runoff over the entire site versus 2.5
times the percentage of imperviousness.
1. Compute the first inch offWlofffrom the developed project:
= (1")(35.49 ac)(I '/12")
= 2.96 ac-ft
2. Compute 2.5 inches times the percentage of imperviousness:
Site area for water quality pervious/impervious calculations only:
= Total project - (water swface + building)
= 35.49 ac - (3.40 ac + 3.66 ac)
= 28.43 ac of site area for water quality pervious/impervious
Impervious area for water quality pervious/impervious calculations only:
F:OOB\SANrA BARBARA LANDlNGS\WATERMAN\SWM REPORT.doc
Page4of6
Agenda Item No, 8C
May 10, 2005
Page 71 of 87
= (Site area for water quality pervious/impervious) - pervious
=28.43 ac-19.51 ac
= 8.92 ac
Percentage of imperviousness for water quality:
= (Impervious area for water quality/Site area for water quality) * 100
= (8.92 ac/ 28.43 ac) * 100
= 31.3% impervious
For 2.5 inches times the percentage impervious:
= 2.5" * 0.313
= 0,78" to be treated
Compute the vohnne required for water quality detention:
= inches to be treated * (total site - water management)
= 0.78" * (35.53 ac - 3.40 ac) * (1 '/12")
= 2.10 ac-ft
2.96 > 2.10 so I" times the entire site controls water quality requirements and 2.96 ac-ft must be
detained on-site prior to discharge.
Using the existing weir at elevation 12.0 is consistent with the modeling done for this project.
D. BLEEDER DESIGN
The head is the height from the invert of the main weir down to the centroid of the bleeder. It was
determined that the main weir would be at elevation 12,0 to meet water quality requirements. The
existing control structure has the inverted 'v' bleeder with a control elevation of 9.50. The model was
run using a 'v' bleeder similar to the existing structure but was modified slightly to reduce the total
discharge.
E. ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE
Allowable discharge is based on the Collier County Stonnwater Management Department Lely Canal
Basin Map. This map allows a Minimwn Allowable Discharge of 0.06 cfs/acre.
0,06 cfs/ac * 35.53 ac. = 2.13 cfs
Using the existing control structure there is a 3.16'-wide inverted 'v' shaped bleeder (invert elevation
of 9.50) and a 4.51 '-wide broad-crested main weir (crest at elevation 12.0), the maximwn discharge
during the 3-day 25-year design storm is 2.73 cfs, which is above the maximwn allowed. We have
provided calculations with a modified weir, where the discharge is 2.11 cfs, which if acceptable. At
this point, tailwater impacts are not included, but would be incorporated in the final design analysis.
F:\1OB'SANI'A BARBARA lANDINGS\W A TERMAN\SWM REI'ORT,doc
Page 5 of6
Agenda Item No, Be
May 10, 2005
Page 72 of 87
F. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY
The proposed project will be pennitted through the South Florida Water Management District, due to
proposed wetland impacts. The enclosed calculations are based on applicable SFWMD/Collier
County criteria and the system as conceptually designed provides an appropriate swface water
management system.
The system as designed provides adequate surface water management.
F:\JOBISANTA BARBARA LANDINGS\WATERMANlSWM REPORT,doc
Page6of6
Cascade 2001 Version 1.0
File: 25yr with revised control structure Date: July 01, 2004
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 73 of 87
Page 1
Project Name: SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS
Reviewer: SB
Project Number: SBLPUD2
Period Begin: Aug 27, 2002;0000 hr End: Sep 10, 2002;0000 hr Duration: 336 hr
Time Step: 0.2 hr, Iterations: 10
Basin 1: BASIN 1
Method: Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph
Rainfall Distribution: SFWMD - 3day
Design Frequency: 25 year
1 Day Rainfall: 8.6 inches
Area: 35.49 acres
Ground Storage: 1.03 inches
Time of Concentration: 0.47 hours
Initial Stage: 9.5 ft NGVD
~XHIBIT
,i
-
Stage
(ft NGVD)
Storage
(acre-ft)
9.50
10.00
10.50
11.00
11. 50
12.00
12.50
13.00
13.50
14.00
0.00
1. 70
5.34
11. 29
19.12
30.07
43.46
59.12
76.56
94.32
Offsite Receiving Body: Offsite1
Time
(hr)
Stage
(ft NGVD)
0.00
336.00
0.00
0.00
Structure: 1
From Basin: BASIN 1
To Basin: Offsite1
Structure Type: Gravity
Weir: Broad Crested, Crest Elev = 12 ft NGVD, Length = 4.51 ft, Weir Coef 0
Bleeder: Inv-Tri, Invert Elev = 9.5 ft NGVD, Height = 0.25 ft
Width = 2.4 ft
Default Coefs: Weir Coef = 2.5, Orifice Coef = 0.6
Pipe: Diameter = 2 ft, Manning's n = 0,13, Length = 45 ft
US Invert Elev = 9.5 ft NGVD, DS Invert Elev = 9.5 ft NGVD, no flap gate
=================================~=======================================~=====
Time
(hr)
Cumulative
Rainfall
(in)
Instant
Runoff
(cfs)
Current
Discharge
(ets)
cumulative
Discharge
(acre-ft)
Head Water
Stage
(ft NGVD)
Tail Water
Stage
(ft NGVD)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50 0.00
4.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50 0.00
8.00 0.42 0.53 0.00 0.00 9.53 0.00
12.00 0.63 0.90 0.00 0.00 9.60 0.00
16.00 0.84 1.13 0.00 0.00 9.70 0.00
20.00 1. 05 1.29 0.00 0.00 9.81 0.00
24.00 1.26 1. 40 0.00 0.00 9.94 0.00
28,00 1. 56 2.20 0.88 0.21 10.04 0,00
32.00 1.87 2.32 0,95 0.52 10.10 0.00
36.00 2.17 2.40 1.02 0.84 10.16 0.00
40.00 2.48 2.46 1. 08 1.19 10.23 0.00
44.00 2.78 2.50 1.14 1.56 10.29 0.00
48.00 3.09 2.54 1.19 1. 94 10.35 0.00
Agenda Item No, 8e
Cascade 2001 Version 1.0 May 10, 2005
File: 25yr with revised control structure Date: July 01, 2004 Pa~e 74 of 87
P ge 2
Cumulative Instant Current Cumulative Head Water Tail Water
Time Rainfall Runoff Discharge Discharge Stage Stage
(hr) (in) (cfs) (cfs) (acre-ft) (ft NGVD) (ft NGVD)
==--=========================================================================--==
52.00 3.47 3.84 1. 26 2.35 10.43 0.00
56.00 4.27 8,52 1. 39 2.79 10.59 0.00
60.00 8.73 141.12 1. 76 3.28 11.15 0.00
64.00 10.66 9.31 2.07 3.95 11. 71 0.00
68.00 11. 27 5.50 2.10 4.64 11. 77 0.00
72 .00 11. 69 3.67 2.11 5.33 11. 80 0.00
76,00 11. 69 0,00 2.10 6.03 11. 77 0.00
80.00 11. 69 0.00 2.08 6.72 11. 74 0.00
84.00 11.69 0.00 2.07 7.41 11. 71 0.00
88.00 11. 69 0.00 2.05 8.09 11.68 0.00
92.00 11.69 0.00 2.03 8.76 11. 65 0.00
96,00 11. 69 0.00 2.02 9.43 11. 62 0.00
100.00 11.69 0.00 2.00 10.09 11.59 0.00
104.00 11. 69 0.00 1. 99 10.75 11.56 0.00
108.00 11.69 0.00 1. 97 11. 41 11.53 0.00
112.00 11.69 0.00 1. 96 12.06 11. 50 0.00
116.00 11. 69 0.00 1. 93 12.70 11.46 0.00
120.00 11. 69 0.00 1. 91 13.33 11. 42 0.00
124.00 11.69 0.00 1. 89 13.96 11. 38 0.00
128.00 11,69 0,00 1.87 14 ,58 11. 34 0.00
132.00 11. 69 0.00 1. 85 15.20 11. 30 0.00
136,00 11. 69 0.00 1. 82 15.80 11.26 0.00
140.00 11.69 0.00 1. 80 16.40 11. 22 0.00
144.00 11.69 0.00 1. 78 16.99 11.18 0.00
148.00 11. 69 0.00 1. 76 17 .58 11.15 0.00
152.00 11.69 0.00 1. 73 18.16 11.11 0.00
156.00 11,69 0.00 1.71 18,73 11. 07 0.00
160.00 11.69 0.00 1. 69 19,29 11. 04 0.00
164.00 11. 69 0.00 1. 67 19.84 11. 00 0.00
168.00 11.69 0.00 1. 64 20.39 10.96 0.00
172.00 11. 69 0.00 1. 61 20.93 10.91 0.00
176.00 11.69 0.00 1. 58 21.45 10.87 0,00
180.00 11,69 0.00 1. 55 21.97 10.82 0.00
184. 00 11.69 0.00 1. 52 22.48 10.78 0.00
188,00 11. 69 0,00 1.50 22.98 10.74 0.00
192.00 11. 69 0.00 1. 47 23.47 10.70 0.00
196.00 11,69 0.00 1. 44 23.95 10.66 0.00
200,00 11.69 0.00 1. 41 24.42 10.62 0.00
204.00 11.69 0.00 1. 38 24.88 10.58 0.00
208.00 11.69 0.00 1.35 25.33 10.54 0.00
212,00 11.69 0.00 1.32 25.77 10.50 0.00
216.00 11.69 0.00 1.28 26.20 10.45 0.00
220.00 11.69 0.00 1.23 26,62 10.39 0.00
224.00 11.69 0.00 1.18 27.01 10.34 0.00
228.00 11. 69 0.00 1.13 27.40 10.28 0.00
232.00 11.69 0.00 1. 09 27.76 10.23 0,00
236.00 11.69 0.00 1. 04 28.11 10.19 0.00
240.00 11.69 0,00 0.99 28.45 10.14 0.00
244.00 11. 69 0.00 0.94 28.77 10.10 0.00
248.00 11.69 0.00 0.90 29.07 10.05 0.00
252.00 11.69 0.00 0.85 29.36 10.01 0.00
256.00 11. 69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
260.00 11,69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
264.00 11.69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
268.00 11.69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
272.00 11. 69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
276.00 11.69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
280.00 11.69 0,00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
284.00 11. 69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9,99 0.00
288.00 11.69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
292.00 11. 69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
296.00 11. 69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
300.00 11.69 0.00 0,00 29.49 9.99 0.00
304.00 11.69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
308.00 11. 69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
312.00 11.69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
316.00 11. 69 0.00 0.00 29.49 9.99 0.00
Cascade 2001 Version 1,0
File: 25yr with revised control structure Date: July 01, 2004
Agenda Item No. 8C
May 10,2005
Paae 75 of 87
page 3
===============================================================================
Time
(hr)
Cumulative
Rainfall
(in)
Instant
Runoff
(cfs)
Current
Discharge
(cfs)
320.00
324.00
328.00
332.00
336.00
11.69
11. 69
11.69
11. 69
11.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
STRUCTURE MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM DISCHARGES
Cumulative
Discharge
(acre-ft)
29.49
29.49
29.49
29.49
29.49
Struc
Max (cfs)
Time (hr)
Min (cfs)
==========~========================-=~================
Time (hr)
1
2,11
72.20
0.00
=======================================================
0.00
BASIN MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM STAGES
Basin
Max (ft)
Time (hr)
Min (ft)
===============================================================
Time (hr)
Head Water
Stage
(ft NGVD)
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
=======~==============================-========================
BASIN 1
11.80
72.20
BASIN WATER BUDGETS (all units in acre-ft)
9.50
0.00
Tail Water
Stage
(ft NGVD)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Basin
Total Structure Structure
Runoff Inflow Outflow
=================================================================================
Residual
Initial
Storage
Final
Storage
BASIN 1
31.15
0.00
29.48
===========================================================================~=====
0.00
1---
0.00
1.67
, .
Agenda Item No, 8C
May 10, 2005
Page 76 of 87
Page 1
Cascade 2001 Version 1.0
File: 100yr Date: July 01, 2004
Project Name: SANTA BARBARA LANDINGS
Reviewer: SB
Project Number: SBLPUD2
Period Begin: Aug 27, 2002;0000 hr End: Sep 10, 2002;0000 hr
Time Step: 0.2 hr, Iterations: 10
Duration: 336 hr
Basin I: BASIN 1
Method: Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph
Rainfall Distribution: SFWMD - 3day
Design Frequency: 100 year
1 Day Rainfall: 11 inches
Area: 35.49 acres
Ground Storage: 1.03 inches
Time of Concentration: 0.47 hours
Initial Stage: 9.5 ft NGVD
EXHIBIT
-
2.
-
Stage
(ft NGVD)
Storage
(acre-ft)
9.50
10.00
10.50
11. 00
11.50
12.00
12.50
13.00
13,50
14.00
0.00
1.78
5.34
11. 29
19.12
30.07
43.46
59.12
76.56
94.32
Offsite Receiving Body: Offsite1
Time
(hr}
Stage
(ft NGVD)
0.00
336.00
0.00
0.00
STRUCTURE MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM DISCHARGES
============================================~==========
Struc
Max (cfs)
Time (hr)
Min (cfs)
Time (hr)
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
BASIN MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM STAGES
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
Basin
Max (ft)
Time (hr)
Min (ft)
Time (hr)
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
BASIN 1
12.40
76.20
9,50
0.00
BASIN WATER BUDGETS (all units in acre-ft)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basin
Total Structure Structure
Runoff Inflow Outflow
Initial
Storage
Final
Storage
Residual
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BASIN 1
40.74
0,00
0.00
0.00
40.74
0.00
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 77 of 87
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
FOR
SANTA BARBARA LANDING PUD
Prepared by:
Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
CIVIL ENGINEERS. LAND SURVEYORS. PLANNERS
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs, Florida 34134
(239) 947-1144
JUNE 2003
F:\JOB\SANTABARBARAlAND\Cds\SBLPUDTIS,DOC
SBLPUD
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 78 of 87
Page 1
SANTA BARBARA LANDING PUD
INTRODUCTION
The subject Santa Barbara Landing PUD proposes a change in allowable land uses for a 35:1:: acre
parcel located on the southwest comer at the intersection of Radio Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard.
The property is located in the northwest quarter of Section 4, Township SO South, Range 26 East,
Collier Comrty, Florida For project location please refer to Flgure 1, Location Map, page 2. The
approved for 248 multiple fiunily dwelling units, which have been constructed. The current request
proposes a maximum of 300 multiple family dwelling units, or an additional 52 units over existing.
The project has one existing entrance on each Santa Barbara Boulevard and Radio Road. Refer to
Figure 2, on page 3, for a reduction of the proposed concept plan.
SCOPE
The following analyses are included in iliis report:
I, Trip Generation Calculations (at buildout) presented for Peak Season Daily Traffic
(pSDT) including the respective peak hour volumes.
2, Trip Assignment within the Radius of Development Influence (RDI).
3. , Existing Traffic Volumes within the RDI; AADT volumes, PSDT volumes, and Level
of Service (LOS),
4, Discussion of impacts to roadwavs within the RDI.
TRIP GENERATION
Trip generation rates are estimRted using 6th Edition Trip Generation published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers. Land Use Code 220, Aparbnent and Land Use Code 230, Residential
Condominimn were used to estimate trip genention for the project. Trip generation calculations are
presented for both the existing and proposed land 'USes. Summaries of the Trip Generation Calculations
for the project are shown on Tables 1 and 2, on pages 4 and 5.
The trip generation for the proposed uses is estimated to be 1,994 trip ends for daily traffic volume and
188 trip ends during the highest peak hour (PM). The trip generation for the previous land 'USes is
estimated to be 1,621 trip ends for daily traffic volume and 153 trip ends during the highest peak hour
(PM), This represents net new trips of3731rip ends for daily traffic and 35 trip ends during the highest
peak hour for the property. Please refer to the DISCUSSION section for details concerning the effects
of these traffic volumes on the level of service for roadway links within the RDI.
F:\JOBISANTABARBARALAND'Cds\SBU'UDTIS,DQC
SBlPUD
Agenda Item No. Be
May 10, 2005
Page 79 of 87
FIGURE 1
I
U
I III
"
"
..
\ III
..
12
GATE
'D
. 51
.
.
.
:D
.l4
Gull .....
01
.Me%ico
CITY :
OF .
NAPLES --
. . -
. .
7 . ,.
.
. .
. ~
.
.
__ ..IT'.'.I ..".
~
.
"'1111. .
.
- . l7' 3:t:. ..
II - ,. "
. S_
.""Ll...la ........ ..
..., l.[lV
--
21 23 JA :Ill .. 12
-- -
taoIIUNTV CllU.EllE:
27 2& 2!l .50 2B 27
~
Q)
C')
N
!':
....
....
[; 34 35 311 31 32
Ii:
r/)
~
~
'0
(f) 3 5
W
a:
;:)
(!)
u:
r/)
i SANTA BARBARA LANDING PUD
<
m
~ LOCATION MAP
t
(!)
. () U") r--
CXlaCXl
0_
ON 0
zcia
E~CXl
aJ >- Q.J
:::=m!?
ro~CL
-0
c
aJ
CJ)
~
FIG URE
,
f
I
~
- ..
~
Il.
~
~
N
....
N
(!)
l4:
(j)
1=
1
en
w
a:
::l
(!)
ii:
(I)
i=
i
a:
~
~
z
~
f
i!j
I
1..=!. - - -
2
"
~ =
111111 I~ I
! I nil. I ! 1:< I
I' ;. I d
II · I K
111,11 s
I
~
I
I
1l~1
.
II:;.
I rJ I
-- '. I
I" .
SANTA BARBARA LANDING PUD
MASTER CONCEPT PLAN
Wd H:e~:u 'dW~ 'flMp'dW~\~Eru\f8 VIN\fS\s6Mp\:
Agenda Item No, Be
May 10, 2005
Page 81 of B7
Santa Barbara Landing Existing
SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION
FOR 248 DWELLING UNITS OF APARTMENT
6-27-03
DRIVE
AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT WAY
RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME
AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.53 0.00 1.00 1621
7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 0.08 0.00 1.00 20
7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 0.43 0.00 1.00 106
7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 0.51 0.00 1.00 126
4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 0.41 0.00 1.00 102
4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 0.20 0.00 1.00 50
4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 0.62 0.00 1.00 153
SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 6.82 0.00 1.00 1691
PK HR ENTER 0.00 0.00 1.00 0
PK HR EXIT 0.00 0.00 1.00 0
PK HR TOTAL 0.49 0.00 1.00 121
SUNDAY 2':'WAY VOL 6.01 0.00 1.00 1491
PK HR ENTER 0.00 0.00 1.00 0
PK HR EXIT 0.00 0.00 1.00 0
PK HR TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1.00 0
Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available
The above rates were calculated from these equations:
24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: T .. 5,994(X) + 134.114, R^2 = .88
7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: T = .497 (X) + 3.238
R^2 .. .83 , .16 ,Bnter, .84 Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: T .. .541(X) + 18.743
RA2 = .75 , .67 Enter, .33 Exit
AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: T .. .542(X) + 3.805
RA2 .. .82 , .28 Enter, .72 Exit
PM Gen Pk Hr, Total: T = .599 (X) + 16.5
RA2 = .8 , .61 Enter, .39 Exit
Sat. 2-Way Volume: T .. 7.852(X) + -256.189, R^2 = .85
Sat. Pk Hr. Total: T .. .412(X) + 1.9.226
R^2 .. .56 , 0 Enter, 0 Exit
Sun. 2-Way Volume: T = 6.418(X) + -1.01.116, R^2 .. .82
Sun. Pk Hr. Total: 0
RA2 .. 0 , 0 Enter, 0 Bxit
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
Santa Barbara Landing Proposed
SUMMARY OF AVERAGE VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION
AVERAGE WEEKDAY DRIVEWAY VOLUMES
6-27-03
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 82 of 87
LAND USE
SIZE
24 HOUR AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
TWO-WAY
VOLUME ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT
APARTMENT 248 DWELLING UNITS
RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM 52 DWELLING UNITS
1621
373
20 106
5 25
102
24
50
12
TOTAL
1994
25 131
126
62
Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 83 of 87
Page 6
TRIP ASSIGNMENT
The projected directional distribution of traffic to and from Santa Barbara Landing PUD site was
based on the previously approved zoning TIS. Project directional distribution is shown on Table 3,
page 7. The distribution is shown for roadways within the Radius of Development Influence (RDI)
only,
EXISTING TRAFFIC
Table 4, page 8, shows existing AADT traffic volumes, including peak hour volmnes, for all major
roadway links within the RDI, The values were taken from the 2002 traffic cowts published in the
Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report. The traffic count data is presented in Appendix A,
Supporting Data. Level of Service (LOS) determinations are made based on the Maximum Service
Flow "Capacity" presented in the Collier Co\Ulty Street Inventory. The street inventory is also
presented in Appendix A, Supporting Data.
DISCUSSION
. The impact of project traffic volumes on the roadway network SUl'J.'OlJDding the project: is not significant.
Project traffic vohmes represent less than 1 % of the maximum service flow capacity for all roadway
links within the RDI. The volume of proposed project traffic does not degrade the level of service of
any of the roadway links within the project: RDI below acceptable standards, considering planned
improvements.
With planned improvements, all segments will operate at LOS Standard or better. All segments will
also have excess peak hour capacity greater than the projected trip generation for the subject property,
F:\JOB\SANT ABARBARALAND\Cds\SBLPUDTIS.DOC
SBLPUD
- 0 L{) I"-
rog~
ON 0
Z6-.:t
E"'- CXl
Q) >- Q)
~liJg>
liJ ~ n..
"0 l..O
& ~
<( ~
-
~
~~ '*' "*- "*- ~ "*- "*-
0 0 V) ~ 0 V)
~6 N ~ N N ~ N
~>
~
~ 1
g j ~ 8 ] aI
~ l:Q
~ ! ; ~
~ ~ !
I &J ~ 0 &1 ~ .,
-g ~ 1J l:Q
0 i
.~ j S l
~
CI.l ;:j
=
:;~
iO i
~E ~
~ I j 1 8 ~
~ l:Q
I ;
E-t ~
t;) g &S g ~
~ ~ ~
III -g &:Q 13 CQ
.~ 0 U) i
.= ~ .~ E
Q.c 0:1 J: 0:1
0 A CI.l
~ ] 1 ]
~
~ ~ ]
~ I:Q
~ ~ ~ 'i 'i 'i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CQ CQ I:Q
i ~ ~ 0 0 ~
~ ~
00 00 00
~
gj
8
~
~
I
~
~
::>
~
'ULDt'-
.--co 0 CO
0_
NO
- ci U')
E ..- CO
Q) >- Q)
:::=('lj~
ro ~ Q..
"0
C
aJ
OJ
<(
t'-
~
~
tI.l
0 Cl 0 0 a:l a:l 0
~
~ Cf"\ ('f"l ~l OQ
= ~~ N ('f"l ('f"l Cf"\
O'I~ OQ OQ ~
i OQ OQ
- - N
~ 8 ~ 8 8 ~ 8
0'1 V'l \0 V'l
0 o~ ~ 0; 0; ~
N N
I t i
I
tI.l l
0 j 8 "i
..;;! ~ ~ I ; ~
~ '"51 S
"'"0 &3 ~ ~ I
.!= -a 6 -g lI:l
~~ 3 "d i .~
I ~ l
\J'.l ;::3
~
~ l
~
~ ~ ] 8 1 J
~ ~ ~ J ;
~ g 'iI ~ ~
~ g ~ ~ j:Q
.~ 0 .~ I
td l ~ ~ I
0 ~ rn
~ i ] 1
i) i)
~ g g g
j:Q CD j:Q
~ ; ; ; '"51 l l
~ ~ 1 ~
~ j:Q j:Q
i ~ i ~ ~ ~
rn rn r/.)
~~
.S N
IE;:
fi
I@
],i
)1
;~
.~ ~
J~
.~ ~
~~
11
'a. 'a.
.~ .~
~'"5I
~~
it
!;::3
8]
]1
'ilg
~j:Q
!i
fii
]rn
ifi
~~
l~
;~
!!
IIfl
c;l}8
* N
~
CQ
U,l
8
i
I
~
i
~
o
~
~
Agenda Item No, 8e
May 10,2005
Page 86 of 87
Quorfes//Jnu/ylU
1m IlIaIIler ~
Ut JIO
NIpIs, !lIIIlIa 54109
'M ~.5'-59
fa 'l39~4999
.........CDII
Au."..". .. L_ I.,
1toMiK_ n.-,..friDM
Nfll--JIaaI...... .....
~....
.........-...... ....
Wrila"s Direct Dial: 239.434,4911
E-Mtil: jdh@)qlllrlcs.c:om
Aprilll. 2005
VIA FACSIMILE
Michael J. DeRuntz
Principal Planner
Community Development and Environmental Services Division
Department of Zoning and Land Development Review 2800 N Horseshoe Dr
Naples, FL 34104
REo" PUDZ.2003.AR...u9J
a.,.MaUer No. 7StlSS&.JtHHIJ
Dear Mr. DeRuntz:
As you may recall. Qwui.es & Brady LLP. is counsel for the Plantation Homeowner's
Association of Collier County, Inc, (".Association"). which is the go~ body for the adjacent
property. I have been in communication with the developer of the above referenced PUD and he
has confirmed. that he committed at the planning commission public hearing to provide an eight
(8) foot wall along the property line as an additional buffer, which is acceptable to the home
owners, Also note that my letter ofMm:h 29. 2005. indicated that there were forty-two (42)
units and the Association understands and does not object to the number of units equally forty-
three (43).
Thank you for your attention to this matter,
Sincerely,
au &BRADru;
~ frt \--
D. Hmnpbrevillc
~
JDH:cah
cc: Glenn Carroll, Manager of Plantation Homeowner's
Association of Collier County, Inc.
D. Wayne Arnold
Richard Y ovanovich. Esq.
QBNAP\458'748.1
Agenda Item No. 8e
May 10, 2005
Page 87 of 87
QporIer/Bmtly UP
1395 Pmlber line
SuiIe 300
Naplr.s, FIodda 341119
Tel 239.262.5959
fax 239.434.4999
WWW.quarIl!s.aIOl
Attor.". .t L.. ill.
Pboenix tlIUl1ilc;wm, Arlzun4
Naplss and Boca Rirton, Ji10rlda
Cbk:tIt/D. I1IJnois
MiIwaIIJIIB and MI1dJson, IViI:cmr.mr
March 29, 2005
RECEIVED
APR 0 1 2005
ZONING DEPARTMENT
Michael J. DeRuntz
Principal Planner .
Community Development and Environmental Services Division
Department of Zoning and Land Development Review
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
RE: PUDZ.2003-AR-4493
Dear Mr. DeRuntz:
It 'lias come to my attention that the owner of the property that is the subject of the above-
referenced petition has' re-petitioned tile County to have the PUD changed. Quarles & Brady is counsel
for the ~Iantation HomEioWnel'$Association of Collier County, Inc. ("Association"). which is the governing
body for the adJacent' propeny.'Re'presentatives of the Association met with representatives of the
owner/petitioner and agreed to compromise agreeing that the density be reduced from 52 to 42, and the
affordable housing component be withdrawn. However. we have requested additional buffering in the
way of a wall and are not at all satisfied with the petitioner's response or lack thereof conceming this
request.
Please accept this letter as notice on behalf of the Association that they object to the petition in its
current form unless and until a resolution is reached to provide for protection and health and safety of the
residents of the Plantation Association and to preserve and protect the aesthetic integrity of the
community.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
QUARLES & BRADY LLP
~It
John D. Humplireville
JDH:kaf . ....
cc~ Glenn Carroll. Manager of Plantation Homeowners
.. . : .' , . " . . Association of Collier County. Inc.
D.WaYne Arnold '
Richard Yovan6vich, Esq.
. :'-',- ..,....
~..:: \-. t -.' '-J .~- .. ~.~~~',:-,; ~;.
',~. :'" ., 1- ;c. ;,.~.... .~._=j..
QBNAP\457606.1
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
POOZ-2004-AR-6258, Palermo Cove PUD, Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo Cove,
Inc., represented by Dwight Nadeau, of RWA, Inc., requesting a rezone from the Rural
Agriculture (A) zoning district to the Planned Unit Development (POO) zoning district to
be known as Palermo Cove POO for property located north of Wolfe Road, west of Collier
Boulevard (C.R. 951), in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida.
OBJECTIVE:
To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) consider an application to rezone the
subject site from Rural Agriculture (A) zoning district to PUD for the purpose of permitting a
residential development with a maximum of 524 residential dwelling units and to make sure that
the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the
community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS:
-
The subject property is located north of Wolfe Road, and west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in
Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
The subject site consists of 131 acres and has a zoning designation of Rural Agricultural (A)
district. The subject property is located in the Urban (Mixed Use DistrictlUrban Residential
Subdistrict) designation. The maximum density pennissible in the Rural Agricultural District
within the Urban (Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) is four dwelling
units per acre, based upon the Density Rating System of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
The subject site is presently undeveloped. The proposed density of Palermo Cove RPUD is 4
dwelling units per acre, which results in a maximum of 524 residential dwelling units. The
subject property incorporates two tracts oflanda that are located diagonally to each other and are
connected at the comer of these two tracts. An access easement has been provided to transition
the internal roadway system within the property. The project master plan includes a mixture of
residential, recreational and preserve land uses. The plan includes the improvement of east-west
Wolfe Road and the interface with the property to the north (Summit Place In Naples
Subdivision, and Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District Station 73). A water
management easement to benefit Collier County for the Collier Boulevard six-Ianing project is
proposed to be located near the eastern end of the subject property. A shared perimeter land use
buffer with the Golden Gate Fire Department (GGFD) Station 73 MPUD is proposed.
FISCAL IMP ACT:
The rezoning by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no
guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development,
.-'
PUDZ-04-AR-6258
Page 1 of5
Executive Summary
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 142
however, if the property is rezoned, a portion of the existing land will be developed and the new
development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as
needed to maintain adopted Level Of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to
meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development
order approved by Collier County is required to pay 50 percent of the estimated Transportation
Impact Fees associated with the project. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building
permit include building pennit review fees and utility fees associated with connecting to the
County's water and sewer system. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad
valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value ofthe improvements.
Please note that the inclusion of impact fees and taxes collected are for informational purposes
only; they are not included in the criteria used by Staff and the Planning Commission to analyze
this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
_.
The subject property is designated Urban (Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban Residential
Subdistrict), as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan.
Relevant to this petition, this subdistrict permits residential development (a variety of unit types)
at a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A), subject to the Density Rating System; and
recreation and open space uses. This project does not qualify for any density bonuses and is not
subject to density reduction. Accordingly, this site is eligible for 4 dwelling units per acre.
The Transportation Services Division has reviewed the Petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement
(TIS) and has determined that the proposed rezone will generate 4,770 Average Daily trips at the
build out of the project in 2008. As a result, this petition is consistent with policies 5.1 and 5.2
of the Transportation Element.
Based on the analysis contained in the Traffic Impact Statement (Exhibit "C"), all roadway
segments significantly impacted as a result of the Palenno Cove RPUD will operate at or above
the adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard for that roadway as established by Collier County.
The only exception is Immokalee Road to the west of Collier Boulevard. This link is slated for
six-Ianing within fiscal year 2006. A six-lane Immokalee Road will function acceptably with the
addition of the traffic from Palenno Cove.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
Environmental Services Staff has reviewed the petition and has recommended approval subject
to the conditions contained in Section 6.8 of the PUD document and in the Environmental
Advisory Council (EAC) Staff Report.
,-
PUDZ-04-AR-6258
Page 2of5
Executive Summary
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10. 2005
Page 3 of 142
EAC RECOMMENDATION:
The EAC reviewed this petition at their April 6, 2005 meeting. The EAC voted 8 to 0 to
recommend approval PUDZ-2004-AR-6258.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) heard this petition at their April 7, 2005
public hearing. The CCPC voted 9 to 0 to recommend approval ofPUDZ-2004-AR-6258 with
the following conditions:
1. The development agreements and easements from the adjoining property shall be
executed prior to the approval of the BCC,
2. Deviation #3 shall be amended to allow eight model homes,
3. No residential building permit shall be issued a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for
residential occupation prior to October 1, 2007.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
_.
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a
determination by the BCC must be based. The legal considerations are reflected in the CCPC
evaluation of the listed criteria in Chapters 10.03.05 and 10.02.13.B.5 of the LDC. These
evaluations are completed as separate documents that have been incOIporated into the attached
staff report. A summary of the legal considerations and findings are noted below:
. The proposed change has been deemed consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies
and Future Land Use Map and the applicable elements of the GMP.
. The proposed land uses are compatible with the existing land use pattern.
. The proposed change will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. This project has also been
deemed consistent with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Traffic Element of the GMP.
. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private, shall be provided.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Petition PUDZ-2004-AR-
6258, subject to the conditions of approval that have been incorporated into the PUD document,
which included the recommendation of approving the six requested deviations, as identified in
Section 2.14 of the PUD document as listed below. After revising the conditions and restrictions
associated with deviation #3 during the CCPC public hearing, staff now supports this deviation.
,,-
PUOZ-04-AR-6258
Page 3 of5
Executive Summary
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 142
Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01 (0) for cuI-de-sac and local street
right-of-way width requirements. The petitioner is seeking relief from the requirement to
provide a 6O-foot wide local road right-of-way. The petitioner is proposing that:
All platted project streets shall have a minimum 50-foot right-of-way.
Deviation 2. seeks relief from LDC Section 3.2.8.4.16.10 for tangent requirements. The
petitioner is seeking relief from tangents to be provided between reverse curves on all
streets. The petitioner is proposing that:
Tangents between reverse curves are not required for any local street design in this
RPUD.
Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c for the number of model homes
permitted within a project. The petitioner is seeking relief from the required maximum of
five model homes. The petitioner is proposing:
Palermo Cove may have one model home representing each type of residential product.
The number of model homes may exceed five, but shall not exceed a total of eight.
--
Deviation 4 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.05.B.l1 for a 5-foot setback from the
property line and the toe-of-slope of a two-foot or higher berm. The petitioner is seeking
relief from the required minimum distance between the property line and the toe-of-slope.
The petitioner is proposing:
No toe-of-slope setback shall be required from the common property/tract boundary of
the residential tract (Tract R) and the proposed GGFD Station 73 MPUD.
Deviation 5 seeks relief from Section 5.06.03.F of the LDC where illuminated signage is
prohibited in residential zones. The petitioner is seeking relied from the prohibition of
placing illuminated signage in residential zones. The petitioner is proposing:
Front illuminated signage shall be permitted for the entrance sign located on Wolfe Road.
Deviation 6 seeks relief from Section 5.06.06.C.12.a where off-premise directional
signage is prohibited in residential zones. The petitioner is seeking relief from the
prohibition of the placement of off-premise directional signage in residential zones. The
petitioner is proposing:
The off-premise directional signage for the Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District
Station 73 may be incorporated into the residential ground or wall signage for Palermo
Cove.
Though this petition received unanimous approval from the CCPC, and as such would have been
placed on the Summary Agenda, however the petitioner does not agree with the CCPC's
recommendation of withholding the Certificate of Occupancies until the mandated date of
".-'
PUDZ-04-AR-6258
Page 4 of5
Executive Summary
-
,'-"
Agenda Item No, 80
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 142
October 1, 2007 and wishes to petition the Board of County Commissioners to remove the
restriction and instead offer a phased plan of development.
PREPARED BY:
Michael J. DeRuntz, C.F.M., Principal Planner
Department of Zoning & Land Development Review
PUDZ-04-AR-6258
Page 5 of5
Executive Summary
Agenda Item No, 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 142
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Mooting Dot.
80
This Item WIS continued from the Aprll26, 2006 Bee Meeting. This Item require.1hst all
particlplnts be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Comminlon members.
PUDZ.2004-AR.62SB. Elias Bro1hers Communities at Pllermo Cove, Inc., represented by
Dwight Nadeau, of RWA, Inc., and Chuck Baslnait, of Henderson, Franklin, Stames & Holt.
P.A. requesting a rezone from the Agriculture zoning district to 1hl Rsaide"1lal Planned
Unit Devllilopmenl (RPUO) zoning diltrtct to bfJI knowl'! as PllermQ COVI!: PUD, conalltll'\Q 0'
131 Icres and a maxlrTlum of 624 residentlal dwelling un!ts The property IS located north
of Wolfe Road, wesL of Collier Boulevard (CR 951). jn Section 34, Townsh~p 48 South.
Range 26 East, Co Iller County, Florida.
5110/20059:00,00 AM
Mom Numbor
him Summary
Approved By
Ray Bellow, Chief Planner D.tlt
Commutllty DeYeIQP",~m1 & Zoning & Land Development Rl!vieW 4/1212006 U.47 PM
Envirmunental SorvlC:lli1l
Approved By
SUIiI" Murrey, AICP Zoning & L.nd Development Dlr.etor Dot.
Communl1y DClvlIIlop,nent & ZOfling & Land Development Review 4112/20062:26 PM
EJlvjrDnmttnt.1 Services
Approved By
Sandra Lea ExecU1ive Secreury Date
CommunitY' Development & Community Development & 41131200511:20 AM
Envlronm.n1~1 S.Nlces Environmental Service. Admin.
Approved By
Donald L. Scott Trunsport.adon Plonnin9 Director o.t.
Tranliportton Services; Transport.tlon PlanninQ 4/1312005 1 :20 PM
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP Tr.n$portatlon Divl,.ton Adminis.tr..tor Date
Tran.portlon Services. Tr.n$portation Services Admin. 4113120062:04 PM
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmilt Community Development & Dot.
Erwlronmental Servic... AdminBtr.tor
Community Oenlopment & Community Oe"alop,,,ent & 4'13/20062:<< PM
Environmental Servlcea Environmental Servicu Admin,
Approved By
Mlujorht M, Student As.siat.nt County Al10muy 1M.
county Attornll'Y County Attorney Office 4/1412005..66 AM
Approved By
OMS Coordinator AdmlniKtratlvft A.Kistaflt Oatu
Coun1y Manllger's Office Office of Management & Budget 4128/2006 ':07 AM
Approved By
Mark luck,l.on Budget AnJllyst Oat.
County M."ag""$ Offlc4! Office (If Man8Sllunont & Budget 51212005 6:31 PM
Approved By
Mic.hll8l Smykowski Man.aement & Budget Direc.tor Date
County Maneger'" Office Office of ManQ'lJament & Budget 613120051 :11 PM
Approved By
Jamea V. Mudd Counrv MlInllUltr Dute:
Board 01 County Comity ManlllQer'a Office 613120063.30 PM
Commi.sionllllfa
AG~~~~
Page 7 of 142
~~9mKt~
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
DEP ARTMENT OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEARING DATE: APRIL 7, 2005
SUBJECT:
PUDZ-2004-AR-6258, PALERMO COVE PUD
AGENT:
Dwight Nadeau, AICP
RW A, Inc.
3050 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 270
Naples, FL 34104
APPLICANTI
CONTRACT
PURCHASER
Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo Cove, Inc.
15100 Collier Boulevard
Naples, FL 34119
REOUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner wishes to rezone 131 acres from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to the
Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district, to be known as Palermo Cove
RPUD.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The property is located north of Wolfe Road, and west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 34,
Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See illustration on following page)
PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The subject site consists of 131 acres and has a zoning designation of Rural Agricultural (A) district.
The subject property is located in the Urban (Mixed Use DistrictlUrban Residential Subdistrict)
designation. The maximum density permissible in the Rural Agricultural District within the Urban
(Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) is four dwelling units per acre, based
upon the Density Rating System of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The subject site is
PUDZ-2004-AR-6258
7,2005
1 of 10
ccpe MEETING APRIL
\
pLnN
I _~g~,
N_
_0
- s:: to
~ :>,(1)
::COg>
CO~o...
-C
C
(1)
Ol
<(
CD
an
N
CD
I
a:
<
r
~
0
0
N
.
""'llLjGIj / N
Z- C
- :::2
11.
..
:I I I t Is z
l fl 0
" -( =1. ~
II I Ii:! ~
Ii I I I w
I 11.
I I I
: ::l I. I~
..Ii ;::1, a.
I I i I.: <(
-- .._ I II ::E
I
I !l I t z
I-
"Ii ' I, !lli 0
I I I -
.....
I !l .d I <(
.lld I il ~ I . I " I I II ' ()
Fi S . +11. . IIi it IllIiC 0
I I l III
-...... I ...J
Ii t: I~ t l-
II IK. I"
.- ~II R I. It.
I I I~ t:1.
-- I
11'-
Im:lloMUII'IID_'" 1iDOCMI~ ~ I!
..--
a.
<(
::E
w
.....
-
en
........................-
~ ..: ~ C1IIdllIlAOOCIMI:nYd _
o gs ~ "'" __ ~..._..
~ 0.... "-- ..0___._____,__ V TIHIHX3:
o~o II II.L
ZOo>
E;"Q)
Q)rorn ;=
'=:"""ro .
(\:l"::::n.
"0
c
Q)
rn
<l:
:z:
~j z
~~
~~
Uoo
O~
~B
~ ~ ~j n
~ ~ ~I ~~
~~ ,..
~
~
~
I r ~
!>-
i
rllil
I:Jif
IItt.
ilft
~~ gp
II
ii
iii '1
~ fi
<<~- !
ql (I I!'
I j Iii Id ,ir ~!L; !, .
: I 'I! ~!I!I' Iii s:; ;~ I .
I" i'I,I' II, Iii! I, ., Ii
I! H ;. I~: SPrz! :P I
' 'I ' S '1,liS 'II!;" s'!1 I,!
II 'IM'II li,ts I~!, . I
f ," :I;i.~: :lfll!1 .f ii II II
I I :1011;11 ;~i:~: ;{~i' I II
I. ~ ,a.'1 ~I- 'sm II' I II I~
1,llh!rlrllllr!lI!~11 H, '1'1
IIljl;II.,1 l'j'IIII~!1111 i !
I 11 · "I ~Iill I' 'I '.' I" I
illhl~;hfm ;1.1 1M: I b
NY"1d ll3.1SV1V an.nJ
-.
'JNI '31\00 OM:r.nvclJ. Y
tmlJNJlJ'iYiCX) Sll3HJ.OW S't'Tl.L..
-"-"-"1\'--
-.--.. ~
~- ..-
~II
~iS
~~
1I1.",'"",,""l--
-
,.".
--
.Dt:C
-
-- ..
---
.
--
....,...,.
-
.,..".,
-
--
-
i~oo~
i
=> ~ !~~
Sh
~ ~ ~ Go
!<~!>-
i nj~
f' 1'1 I '.. ; I,
f . 'II ..f '. ~ I :1
I · f I I IIlq~ J ' ' J
! I, I!i mi~I~I'i'li~J' ~! Ii
I ,II". 1-'IU~lrl~li II II
~, I !isi~ Sl~,;.i~ II~id,!~ I_
f I ~!I'I'<r'l I"~",," I '
i i. i 1!I'llIlmli,~iilii'U!1 ,I:
,I, II 1llllrr'lql hi" d II
" I I ,~'..' 'S 'f.""'lll' , it
. .r"_ II S rill r
I il h;;U!h;ili:!I:!iUnUI ;'1 it
III ~ rlr!:I;llm!lI~J'IIJII\ il 'f
~ ,llill!ililtiilri"lfl;dr It II
~i n
Ir ii
f~ ci
~CIJl
I;l(i r
j! 'I.::~_.__.._----_._.,
.+-
. .
I
I
::=::
I! U :il
r II 11< II;
t .f i I IPc.
, lib ", !,' ili
r- ~ d tHe!. i;~1
'P i I' Iii
I q ~ MIll ~:I~
;if II 'I I. 'i Jill
III f~11!1;i
! i! tJ" IF. i~'
r i I. Ii n 'Ii ::.~
I t r! Ii rr rb hS.
,.:..."'..,....~
o ~
.'.. ~
'~i
\lXJJ
-__h._._
~
i
......'
IO~:===
nu
I.
-,
II
I.
-II i
I
I.
"II
I
.;,
Agenda Item No. 3D
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 142
presently undeveloped. The proposed density of Palermo Cove RPUD is 4 dwelling units per acre,
which results in a maximum of 524 residential dwelling units. The subject property incorporates
two tracts of lands that are located diagonal to each other and are connected at the comer of these
two tracts. An access easement has been provided to transition the internal roadway system within
the property. The project master plan includes a mixture of residential, recreational and preserve
land uses. The plan includes the improvement of east-west Wolfe Road and the interface with the
property to the north (Summit Place In Naples Subdivision, and Golden Gate Fire Control and
Rescue District Station 73). A water management easement to benefit Collier County for the
Collier Boulevard six-Ianing project is proposed to be located near the eastern end of the subject
property. A shared perimeter land use buffer with the Golden Gate Fire Department (GGFD)
Station 73 MPUD is proposed.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
Subject Parcel:
The site is undeveloped; zoned Rural Agricultural (A)
Surrounding:
North: Single and multiple-family residential development, zoned Indigo
Lakes PUD, and Brittany Bay Apartments PUD
East: Single and multiple-family residential, commercial and essential
service development and County Road 951; zoned Summit Place In
Naples RPUD, Golden Gate Fire Department (GGFD) Station 73
MPUD, and Vanderbilt County Club PUD
South: Private Roadway then partially developed single-family residential
and commercial development, zoned Wolfe Creek PUD and Nagel-
Craig Business Park PUD (potential)
West: Single and multiple-family residential development, zoned
Islandwalk PUD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban (Urban - Mixed Use
District, Urban Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth
Management Plan. Relevant to this petition, this subdistrict permits residential development (a
variety of unit types) at a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A), subject to the Density
Rating System; and recreation and open space uses. This project does not qualify for any density
bonuses and is not subject to density reduction. Accordingly, this site is eligible for 4 dwelling units
per acre.
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with the surrounding area. Comprehensive
Planning leaves this determination to Current Planning staff as part of their review of the petition in
its totality.
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes:
1. The proposed uses for the site may be deemed consistent with the FLUE.
2. The proposed density for this site (4.0 DU/A) may be deemed consistent with the Future
Land Use Element.
2
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 142
) f> f-"'.
<. l_--.... PLD
ZONING MAP
3
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10. 2005
Page 12 of 142
AERIAL MAP
TransDortation Element: The Transportation Department has reviewed the Petitioner's Traffic
Impact Statement (TIP) and has determined that the proposed rezone will generate 4,770 Average
Daily trips at the build out of the project in 2008. As a result, this petition is consistent with policies
5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation Element.
Based on the analysis contained in the Traffic Impact Statement (Exhibit "COO), all roadway
segments significantly impacted as a result of the Palermo Cove RPUD will operate at or above the
adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard for that roadway as established by Collier County. The
only exception is Immokalee Road to the west of Collier Boulevard. This link is slated for six-
4
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10. 2005
Page 13 of 142
laning within Fiscal Year 2006. A six-lane Immokalee Road will function acceptably with the
addition of the traffic from Palermo Cove.
ANALYSIS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a
favorable determination must be based. These criteria are specifically noted in Section 10.02.13 of
the Land Development Code and required staff evaluation and comment. The Collier County
Planning Commission (CCPC) and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) also used these
criteria as the basis for their recommendation. Appropriate evaluation of petitions for amendments
to PUDs should establish a factual basis for supportive action by appointed and elected decision-
makers. Each of the potential impacts or considerations identified during the staff review are listed
under each of the criterion noted and are summarized by staff, culminating in a determination of
compliance, non-compliance, or compliance with mitigation. These evaluations are completed as
separate documents and are attached to the staff report. (See Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B")
Environmental Analysis: Environmental Services Staff has reviewed the petition and has
recommended approval subject to the conditions contained in Section 6.8 of the PUD document and
in the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Staff Report (Exhibit "D").
The EAC will be reviewing this petition at their April 6, 2005 meeting. The County staff will
verbally provide the EAC's recommendations to the CCPC during their public hearing of this item.
Transportation Analysis: Transportation Department Staff has reviewed the petition and has
recommended approval subject to the conditions contained in Section 6.5 of the PUD document,
including subsection "M" as follows:
"Section G-G on Sheet 5 of 5 of the RPUD Plans Set reflects the local residential street
cross-section, as mandated by the Collier County Transportation Division. If prior to the
completion of the construction of Wolfe Road EIW local street, the County classifies this
roadway as a collector or arterial, the Developer shall construct the roadway to the standards
set forth by the County. All additional costs associated with the upgrade from a local road to
the higher classification shall be eligible for impact fee credits.'
Utilities: The Utilities Department Staff has reviewed the petition and has recommended approval
subject to the conditions contained in Section 6.7 of the PUD document.
Zoning and Land Qey~Lo,pment Review Analvsis: The evaluation by professional staff includes an
analysis of the project's relationship to the community's future land use plan and whether or not a
rezoning action would be consistent with the GMP. Other evaluation considerations include an
assessment of adequacy of transportation infrastructure, other infrastructure, and compatibility with
adjacent land uses. In addition, staff offers the following synopsis:
Relationship to Future Land Uses - A discussion of this relationship, as it applies specifically to
Collier County's legal basis for land use planning, refers to the relationship of the proposed zoning
action to the Future Land Use Element of the GMP. The subject property is designated Urban
(Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the
5
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 142
Growth Management Plan. This district permits residential uses, as proposed, at the density
proposed. Staff believes that the petitioner's, requested uses and density are compatible with the
FLUE, thus this petition is consistent with the GMP.
Relationship to Existing Land Uses ':' The subject property is bordered by Collier Boulevard, Wolfe
Road, Islandwalk PUD, Indigo Lakes PUD, Brittany Bay Apartments PUD, Summit Place in Naples
RPUD and Golden Gate Fire Department (GGFD) Station 73 MPUD. The subject property is
located in the Rural Agricultural (A) district. This zoning district permits one residential dwelling
unit per five gross acres. The 131 acres would yield 26 units. Presently, the subj ect property is
undeveloped. In rezoning the subject property to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD),
the petitioner is proposing to develop a maximum of 524 residential dwelling units by utilizing a
base density of four dwelling units per acre. The adjoining residential development to the east,
Summit Place in Naples RPUD, was approved for a total of 394 dwelling units on 98.47 acres (4
dwelling units per acre); Golden Gate Fire Department (GGFD) Station 73 MPUD, was approved
for a total of 50,000 square feet of essential services and governmental office space and 16 multiple-
family residential units on 9.4 acres (4 DU/A); Vanderbilt County Club PUD was approved for a
total of 800 dwelling units on 323 acres (2.48 dwelling units per acre). Indigo Lakes PUD, which is
located to the north, was approved for 442 dwelling units on 181.37 acres (2.43 DU/A), and Brittany
Bay Apartments PUD, was approved for a total of 487 dwelling units on 58.6 acres (8.16 DU/A).
The Wolfe Creek PUD, which is located south of the subject property, was approved for 591
dwelling units on 147.69 acres (4 DU/A); Nagel-Craig Business Park PUD, a proposed commercial
development has been continued by the BCC; and further south, Mission Hills PUD was approved
for 200,000 square feet of commercial floor area on 33.45 acres. The Islandwalk PUD, which is
located to the west of the subject property, was approved for a total of 2,100 dwelling units on 705
acres (3.04 DU/A). Therefore, staff believes the proposed uses for the petition would not adversely
impact the existing residential land uses in the area. Furthermore, staff believes that the
development regulations, landscaping, and the screening and buffering requirements of the PUD
District will meet the goals of the GMP and enhance the aesthetic quality of this area.
Deviation Discussion:
The petitioner is seeking four deviations and has identified them in Sections 2.7.~ 2.7.C, 2.IO.B,
and 6.11.B of the PUD document. The petitioner has provided justification in support of the
deviations in correspondence received by the staff with the application on December I, 2004
(Exhibit B). Staff has analyzed the deviations and provides the analyses and recommendations
below.
Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.0 I (0) for cul-de-sac and local street right-of-way
width requirements. The petitioner is seeking relief from the requirement to provide a 60-foot wide
local road right-of-way. The petitioner is proposing that:
All platted project streets shall have a minimum 50-foot right-of-way.
The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation:
6
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
Page 15 of 142
"to provide for flexibility in the development design, subject to providing easement for
required utilities generally parallel to the right-ofway. This is a reasonable deviation that
has been implemented in subdivisions throughout the County, and does not compromise
health, safety, and welfare issues related to civil engineering design. "
Staff is supportive of deviation No. I with the stipulation that the streets shall remain private. The
current interior roadway system is privately maintained and the added roadway surface would be the
same. Staff, therefore, finds the deviation in compliance with LDC Section IO.02.13.A.3, in that the
petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the
health, safety and welfare of the community."
Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.2.8.4.16.10 for tangent requirements. The petitioner is
seeking relief from tangents to be provided between reverse curves on all streets. The petitioner is
proposing that:
Tangents between reverse curves are not required for any local street design in this RPUD.
The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation:
"This RPUD will not require tangents between reverse curves in order to provide
greater subdivision design flexibility. All internal roads within the RPUD will be
private, and have low posted speed limits, and will have a curvilinear design that
has been shown to act as traffic calming measures by reducing local traffic speeds.
Additionally, the flat terrain found on site does not warrant the need for tangents.
This is a reasonable deviation that has been applied throughout the County, and
does not comprise a risk to public health, safety and welfare. "
Staff is supportive of deviation No.2 with the stipulation that the streets shall remain private. The
current interior roadway system is privately maintained, and the added roadway surface would be
the same. Staff, therefore, finds the deviation in compliance with LDC Section IO.02.13.A.3 in that
the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the
health, safety and welfare of the co~f.ty."
Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c for the number of model homes permitted
within a project. The petitioner is seeking relief from the required maximum of five model homes.
The petitioner is proposing:
Palermo Cove may have one model home representing each type of residential product. The
number of model homes may exceed five, but shall not exceed a total of ten.
The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation:
''In an effort to provide a variety of residence styles andfloor plans within residential
development, it is essential not to arbitrarily limit the opportunity of a home buyer to
see the creativity of the architecture proposed in a development. To do so could
7
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 142
result in monotonous tract housing reminiscent of the "new town II movement after
the end of the World War II. This deviation is appropriate. and does not negatively
affect the health and safety, nor welfare of the future residents of the development. A
reasonable limitation on the number of models has been provided for in the RPUD
Document. "
Staff is not supportive of deviation No.3. The LDC maximum limitation of five model homes is not
arbitrary. Allowing for five models per project provides the developer the opportunity to
demonstrate the different products that can be provided. It also provides a limitation to the use of
land provided for this temporary use. Staff, therefore, fmds the deviation not to be in compliance
with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3 in that the petitioner has not demonstrated that "the element maybe
waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community."
Deviation 4 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.05.B.l1 for a 5-foot set-back from the property line
and the toe-of-slope of a two-foot or higher berm. The petitioner is seeking relief from the required
minimum distance between the property line and the toe-of-slope. The petitioner is proposing:
No toe-of-slope setback shall be required from the common property/tract boundary of the
residential tract (Tract R) and the proposed GGFD Station 73 MPUD.
The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation:
"A required land use buffer will be shared between the Residential Tract (I'ract R),
and the Community Facilities Tract (I'ract CF), in the GGFD Station 73 MPUD. and
the Residential Tract (I'ract R) in the proposed Palermo Cove RPUD. Requiring toe-
of-slope setback would create a non-uniform improvement that would tend to collect
storm water and irrigation water that would eventually compromise the integrity of
the landscape plantings and the berm itself. ..
Staff is supportive of deviation No.4 with the stipulation that the easement agreements with the
adjoining property, for the maintenance of this buffer area, shall be recorded at the time of the
approval of the record plat. Staff, therefore, fmds the deviation in compliance with LDC Section
10.02.13.A.3 in that the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a
detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community."
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING:
Synopsis provided by Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator:
The applicant held the required NIM on November 8, 2004 at 5:30 P.M. at the Faith Community
Church, 6455 Hidden Oaks Lane, Naples, FL. Two individuals other than the applicant's agents and
county staff were present. RW A, Inc.'s Bob Mulhere, standing in for Dwight Nadeau, presented
the proposal for rezone without objections or opposition stated. One of the audience members, who
identified herself as a resident of Island Walk, asked several questions regarding access points,
buffering and the residential product proposed. Mr. Mulhere suggested that as agents for the
8
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 142
applicant, RW A, Inc. would like to speak at an upcoming Island Walk homeowner's association
meeting to give additional opportunity to the residents to communicate any concerns.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward a
recommendation of approval of petition PUDZ-04-AR-6258, subject to the conditions of approval
that have been incorporated in the PUD document and the following recommendations:
1. That Deviation #3 not be granted as noted above in the staff report.
2. Revise Section 2.11 of the PUD document to require that the clubhouse be consistent with
Subsection 1O.02.04.AA of the Land Development Code.
9
CHAEL J. DE
DEPARTMENT ZONING &
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIEWED BY:
LOWS, ZONING MANAGER
DEP TMENT OF ZONING &
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
~~~
DEP ARTMENT OF ZONING &
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APPROVED BY:
Petition PUDZ-2004-AR-6258
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 142
D;d~~
"""!:J 17/0h
~
3/7 A,r
DATE
~/~-
DA
Tentatively scheduled for the April 26, 2005 Board of County Commissioners Meeting.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
&JilM
RUSSELL A. BUDD, CHAIRMAN
10
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 19 of 142
REZONE FINDINGS
PETITION PUDZ-04-AR-6258
Section 10.03.05 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report and
recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners shall show
that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the
following, where applicable:
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives & policies of
the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan.
The subject property is located within the Urban (Urban-Mixed Use District, Urban Residential
Subdistrict). The density permitted within the Palermo Cove RPUD is consistent with the FLUE as
currently provided in the Growth Management Plan by Policy 3.1, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6 and the Density
Rating System. Therefore, this petition is Consistent by Policy.
2. The existing land use pattern;
The property to the north is zoned Indigo Lakes PUD (formerly Wyndam Park) developed as single-
family residential (3.04 DU/A), Summit Place in Naples developed as single-family and multiple-
family residences (4 DU/A), and Golden Gate Fire Department (GGFD) Station 73 MPUD developed
as commercial and essential services. The property to the east is zoned Vanderbilt Country Club
PUD developed as single-family and multiple-family residence (2.34 DU/A) and both developed and
undeveloped Estates lots. The property to the south is zoned Wolfe Creek PUD undeveloped single-
family residences, and the proposed Nagel-Craig Business Park PUD. The property to the west is
zoned Islandwalk PUD developed as single-family and multiple- family residence (3.04 DU/A)
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
The Palermo Cove RPUD parcel is of sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also consistent with expected land uses by
virtue of its consistency with the FLUE of the GMP.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
The proposed Palermo Cove boundaries are logically drawn in relation to the existing
development pattern and property ownership
EXHIBIT "A"
PlnDZ-2004-A.R-6258
Palermo Cove RPUD
10f6
CCPC MTG.
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 142
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment
necessary.
The subject property is located within the Urban (Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban Residential
Subdistrict). Within the applicable Urban Designation Area, a base density of 4 residential dwelling
units per gross acre is pennitted, though not an entitlement. This base level of density may be
adjusted depending upon the location and characteristics of the project. The maximum residential
dwelling unit density of the surrounding PUDs is 4 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project is
necessary in order to provide the required facilities to meet the demand for residential dwellings in
this area.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions within the neighboring properties
due to the project's consistency with the GMP and compatibility with neighboring properties. The
proposed dwelling units will consist of single-family attached dwellings (including townhouses) and
villa/patio dwellings (detached single-family dwellings of a smaller scale than the typical single-
family detached dwellings). The proposed rezone will have no significant impact on any adopted
level of service standard.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of
the development, or otherwise affect public safety.
Evaluation of this project took into account the requirement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the
Transportation Element and Policy 6.1 of the Future Land Use Element of the GMP and was found
consistent. The proposed change will result in an overall 4,770 trips per day within the Palermo Cove
PUD. Collier Boulevard is planned to be improved to six lanes in 2005. Upon the completion of the
Collier Boulevard six-laning, Collier County plans to signalize the intersection of Collier Boulevard
and Wolfe Road.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The Land Development Code specifically provides the development standards that are designed to
reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. New development in and of itself is not supposed to
. increase flooding potential on adjacent property over and above what would occur without
development. In summary, every project approved in Collier County involving the utilization of land
for some land use activity is scrutinized and required to mitigate all sub-surface drainage generated
by developmental activities as a condition of approval. This project was reviewed for drainage
relationships and design and construction plans are required to meet County standards as a condition
of approval.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
All projects in Collier County are subject to the development standards that are unique to the zoning
district in which it is located. These development standards and others apply generally and equally to
PtnDZ-2004-JUR-62S8
Palermo Cove RPUD
20f6
CCPC MTG.
Agenda Item No. BD
all . d' . (' " May 10, 2005
zonmg IStricts l.e. open space reqwrement, comdor management provisions, etc.'~etlof;~
to ensure that light penetration and circulation of air does not adversely affect adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area.
Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning, however zoning by itself mayor
may not affect values, since value determination by law is driven by market value. The mere fact that
a property is given a new zoning designation or amendment mayor may not affect value. However,
staff is of the opinion that this petition will not adversely affect property values based on the projects
consistency with the Growth Management Plan and the development regulations of the Land
Development Code.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
The undeveloped properties nearby the proposed PUD should not be affected by the requested
amendment in that the project provides a landscape buffer, provides an area dedicated for
conservation/preserves, and is consistent with the approved zoned projects in the area.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasting with the public welfare.
The proposed rezone to PUD complies with the Growth Management Plan, which is a public policy
statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said plans. In light of this fact the
proposed PUD does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further
determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public
interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
The subject property is presently undeveloped, but portions of the property has been utilized for
timbering and cattle grazing. The maximum density of one dwelling unit per acre would be permitted
within the Rural Agricultural district regulations (26 dwelling units). Utilizing the Planned Unit
Development rezoning procedures within the Urban (Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban Residential
Subdistrict) designation to the GMP, the petition proposes to utilize the "Base Density" criteria of the
Density Rating System of the GMP for a maximum 524 residential dwelling units.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
County.
The proposed PUD is designed in a manner that is compatible with surrounding and approved
residential property in size and scale. It is also consistent with the FLUE of the Growth Management
Plan.
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use
in districts already permitting such use.
There are many sites that are zoned to accommodate the proposed development. This is not the
determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a rezoning decision. The determinants of
PUDZ-2004-AR-6258
Palermo Cove RPUD 3 of 6 CCPC MTG.
Agenda Item No. 80
. . . . . May 10, 2005
zoning are consistency WIth all elements of the GMP, compatibIlity, adequacy of infra~20
some extent the timing of the action and all of the above criteria.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which
would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed, zoning classification.
The site contains areas of jurisdictional wetlands that are characterized as transitional wetlands in
which the predominant vegetation is a mix of pine and cypress and associated upland and wetland
plants. Pursuant to Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier
County GMP, and Section 3.05.07 of the Land Development Code, a minimum of 14.2 acres (25%) is
required to be retained. The Conceptual Master Plan identifies Tract "P" which contains
approximately 38 acres.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan
and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities
Ordinance, as amended.
A multi-disciplined team responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP has reviewed this
petition and they have found it consistent with the GMP. The conditions of approval have been
incorporated into the PUD document. Staff reviews for adequacy of public services and levels. of
service determined that required infrastructure meets with GMP established relationships.
PUDZ-2004-AR-6258
Palermo Cove RPUD
40f6
CCPC MTG.
FINDINGS FOR PUD
PUDZ-04-AR-6258
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 23 of 142
Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Planning Commission
to make a finding as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation
to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
Jurisdictional reviews by County staff support the manner and pattern of development proposed for
the subject property. Development conditions contained in the Palermo Cove PUD document give
assurance that all infrastructures will be developed consistent with County regulations. Any
inadequacies that require supplementing the PUD document will be recommended to the Planning
Commission and the BCC as conditions of approval by staff. Recommended mitigation measures
will assure compliance with Level of Service relationships as prescribed by the GMP.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may
relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance
of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the Palermo Cove RPUD application provide evidence of unified control.
The PUD document makes appropriate provisions for continuing operation and maintenance of
common areas. In Subsection 14.c of the "Agreement for Purchase and Sale" the Seller (Harvey
Brothers Farm, Inc.) grant to the buyer (A.R.M. Development Corp. of S.W. FL, Inc.) the right to
pursue all appropriate PUD approvals.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
The subject petition has been found consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the GMP.
The Palermo Cove RPUD proposes a maximum of 524 residential dwelling units that is consistent
with the GMP (See Staff report).
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
r.estrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
The adopted PUD, including all the attendant buffering, land use locational criteria, and other
compatibility development requirements reasonably assure the project will be constructed with
internal and external compatibility addressed.
EXIllBIT "B"
PUDZ-2004-AR-6258
Palermo Cove RPUD
50f6
CCPC MTG.
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 24 of 142
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in. existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
As provided in Section V - Preserve Areas and Subsection 6.8 - Environmental of the pun
Document, the amount of open space set aside by this project is consistent with the provisions of the
Land Development Code.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The proposed Palermo Cove RPUD will not adversely impact the timing or sequence of development
that is currently allowed in the area. Furthermore, the adopted concurrency requirements ensure that
further LOS degradation is not allowed or the LOS deficiency is corrected.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
Ability, as applied in this context, implies supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal
system, potable water supplies, characteristics of the property relative to hazards, and capacity of
roads, is supportive of conditions emanating from urban development.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations
in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
The petition proposes four deviations to ensure a compact design for efficiency of infrastructure,
variety of model homes, and perimeter buffering. Staff analysis indicates that the Palermo Cove
RPUD conforms to the PUD regulations.
PUDZ-2004-AR-6258
Palermo Cove RPUD
60f6
CCPC MTG.
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 25 of 142
Item \
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
~~~_~_-::":'=:~.~_n~.. ...,..~... ~~~_.__ ._.... ._.
'--:-'.~"-':'.;;,"--:-:..,.::::::-:~.--..-
STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF ADrll6. 2005
I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT:
Petition No.:
Petition Name:
ApplicantJDeveloper:
PUDZ-2004-AR-6258
PALERMO COVEPUD
Elias Brothers Communities at Palenno
Cove; Inc.
Dwight Nadeau, AICP,RWA, INC.
Passarella and Associates, Inc.
Engineering Consultant:
Environmental Consultant:
"n. LOCATION:
The property is located on the north of WQlfe Road, and west of Collier Boulevard '
(CR 951) m Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida.
III. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES:
The property to the north is zoned Indigo Lakes PUD (formerly Wyndam Park)
developed as single-family residential (3.04 DU/A), Summit Place in Naples
developed as single-family and multiple-family residences (4 DU/A), and Golden
Gate Fire Department (GGFD) Station 73 MPUD developed as commercial and
, essential services. The property to the east is zoned Vanderbilt Country Club
PUD developed as single-family and multiple-family residence (2.34 DU/A) and
both developed and undeveloped Estates lots. The property to the south is zoned
Wolfe Creek PUD undeveloped single-family residences, and Nagel-Craig
Business Park PUD (potential) proposed commercial center. The property to the
west is zoned Islandwalk PUD developed as single-family and multiple- family
residence (3.04 DU/A)
ZONING
DESCRIPTION
N-
Indigo Lakes PUD, and
Brittany Bay Apartments PUD
Single and multiple-family
residential development,
EXHIBIT - D
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 26 of 142
Page 2 of8
s-
Wolfe Creek PUD and, Private Roadway then partially
, NageI~'-Cr8.ig ausiness ParK 'ptJD-==crevelope<fsmgle-1amilY-resicrentiar~------"-=
(potential) and commercial development
E - Summit Place In Naples RPUD,
Golden Gate Fire Department
, (GGFD) Station 73 MPUD, and
Vanderbilt County Club PUD
Multiple-family residential
commercial and essential service
development and County Road 951
W - Islandwalk PUD
Single and multiple-family
residential development
IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The subject site consists of 131 acres, and has a zoning designation of Rural
Agricultural (A) district. The subject property is located in the Urban (Mixed Use
District/Urban Residential Subdistrict) designation. The maximum density
permissible in the Rural Agricultural District within the Urban. (Urban - Mixed
Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) is four dwelling units per acre, based
upon the Density Rating System of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The
subject site is presently undeveloped. The proposed density of Palermo Cove
RPUD is a maximum 524 residential dwelling. units. The. subject property
incorporates two tracts of lands that are located diagonally to each other and are
connected ,at the corner of these two-tracts. An access easement has been
provided to transition the internal roadway system within the property. The
project master plan includes a mixture of residential, recreational and preserves
land uses. The plan includes the improvement of East-West Wolfe Road, and the
interrace with the property to the north (Sl:l.Il11l1jt Place In Naples Subdiyision, arid
Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District Station 73): A water management
easement, to benefit Collier County for the Collier Boulevard six';'laning project, is
proposed to be 'located near the. eastern e1ld of the subj ect property. A shared
perimeter land use buffer with the Golden Gate Fire Department (GGFD) Station
73 MPUD is proposed.
V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element:
The subject property is designated Urban (Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban
Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth
Management Plan. Relevant to this petition, this subdistrict pennits residential
development (a variety of unit types) at a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre,
subject to the Density Rating System; and recreation and open space uses. This
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
Page 27 of 142
Page 3 of8
project does not qualify for any density bonuses and is not subject to density
reduction. Ac~~rding1y, this si~_~eli~ble for ~,~~_~l1ing units p~ acre.
.,-,----.=~~.-~.~~~.~... ........~ '~.;.:: ,.......-.- y,~..-..,~~,.-., ""'I'e":'~.,., . __....~''".;..~_'_'____~-:::_.,_._.__
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with the surrounding
area. Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to Current Planning staff
as part of their review of the petition in its totality.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes: , ,
1. The proposed uses for the site may be deemed consistent with the FLUE.
2. The proposed density for this site (4.0 DU/A) maybe deemed consistent
with the Future Land Use Element.
Conservation & Coastal Manll2ement Element:
Objective 2.2. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the
Growth Management Plan states "All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging
" into estuaries sh~l meet all applicable federal, state,or local water quality
standards".
To accomplish that, policy 2.2.2 states "In order to limit the specific and
cumulative impacts of stonnwater runoff, stonnwater systems should be designed
in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an
attempt is made to enhance the timing, quantity,and quality of fresh wat~r '
(discharge) to the estuarine system". " "
This project is consistent with the objectives of policy 2.2.2 in that it attempts to
mimic or enhance. the quality and quantity of water leaving the site by utilizing
lakes and intercOnnected wetlands to provide water quality retention and peak
fli,>w attenuation during stOrtIl events.
The project as proposed is consistent with the Policies in Objective 6.1 and 6.2 of
the Conservation & Coastal Management Element, for the following reasons:
Twenty-five percent (25 %) of the existing native vegetation is required to be
retained qn-site and set aside as preserve areas with conservation easements
prohibiting further development. This project is proposing to retain and preserve
26.2 % of the existing native vegetation on-site. Selection ofpresefvation areas,
are consistent with the criteria listed in Policy 6.1.1.
Habitat management and exotic vegetation removal/maintenance plans are
required at the time of Site Development Plan/Construction Plan submittal.
Preserve areas shall be required to be maintained free of Category I invasive
exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council.
EAe Meeting
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 28 of 142
Page 4 of8
Littoral shelf planting areas within wet detention ponds shall be required at the
,,^, --.-,-. ,...time' of S1~~neveropment pranlConstructlon Plan' stibiTiittal, 'iilid\vilrDe'reqUirea~-- ---~-'--~
to meet the minimum planting area requirement in Policy 6.1.7.
The requirement for an Environmental Impact Statement (BIS) pursuant to Policy
6.1.8 has been satisfied.
Jurisdictional wetlands have been identified as required in Policies 6.2.1 and
6.2.2. Pursuant to Policy 6.2.4, the County shall require appropriate agency
permits prior to the issuance of a final local development order pennitting site
improvements (Site Development Plan)~ As stated in ~olicies 6.23 and 6.2.4.
where permits issued by jurisdictional agencies allow for impacts to wetlands
within the Urban, Designated Area and require mitigation for such impacts, this
shall be deemed to meet the objective of protection and conservation of wetlands
and the natural functions of wetlands within Uris area.
In accordance with Policy 6.2.6, required preservation areas are identified on the
PUD master plan. Allowable uses within the preserve areas are included in the
PUDdocument. Uses within preserve areas shall not include any activity
detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation. erosion control, or fish
and wildlife conservation and preservation.
A wildlife survey for listed species in accordance with Policy 7.1.2 is included in
the ,Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Wildlife habitat management plans for
listed species are required ,at the time of Site Development Plan/Construction Plan
submittal. '
VI. MAJOR ISSUES:
Stormwater Manae:ement:
Palermo Cove is within the four square mile area, known as the Harvey Drainage
basin. The basin is bounded by Rte 951 on the East, Vanderbilt Beach Road on
the south, 1-75 on the west, and Immokalee Road on the north. The entire Harvey
Basin has an allowable discharge rate of 0.055 cfs/acre.
The South Florida Water Management District has taken a holistic approach to
projects in this basin. The general flow in the basin is to the southwest. which
puts most of the flow through the Islandwalk PUD lake system to the west of
Palermo Cove, and discharge from this project is into a slough to the south which
eventually flows into the Islandwalk lake system. The entire basin discharges into
the D-2 Canal on the east side ofl-75.
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No, 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 29 of 142
Page 50f8
____ _ _..The iIltemal stormw~~_I!lanag~ent ~Btem for Pal~() Cove' co!l8ists ~~ six
" . "-== .~,.", iDlerconnectedlakes~ five dIY- detentlc>n areaS;" and.. two . wetlands" tharproVlde ' " =-.. -'----------=-=
water quality retention and peak flow attenuation.
Environmental:
Site Description:
The 131.23 acre site is surrounded by residential development and is heavily
infested with invasive exotic vegetation. 'The site is comprised of pine and cypress
wetlands, upland pine flatwoods, and melaleuca stands. All the vegetative
communities on the site are impacted to varying degrees with invasive exotic
vegetation.
According to the Collier County Soils Map, the following soil types are found
on the property: Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum (Soil Map Unit 2);
Basinger Fine Sand (Soil Map Unit 17); and Holopaw fine sand (Soil Map
Unit 27).
Nails marking biological indicators (i.e., lichen lines, adventitious rooting, etc.) of
wetland seasonal water levels were set in the field and were surveyed by RW A,
Inc. The development has been designed not to affect pre-development wetland
hydroperiods. Control elevations for the stormwater management system will
be established based on the elevations of the biqlogical indicators of wetland
, water levels.
Wetlands:
There are 106.44 acres of SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands onsite~ The
SFWMD wetland lines were approved by the SFWMD during-tiiife.visits on
March 11,2004. The construction of the project will result in direct wetland
impacts to 72.27 acres of the on-site wetlands. The wetland mitigation plan for
the project preserves 35.01 acres (26.7 percent) of the property. The mitigation
plan involves the enhancement and preservation of 34.13 acres of wetlands and
enhancement and preservation of 1.26 acre of upland preserves. Wetland and
upland enhancement will include the removal of exotic and nuisance
vegetation.
EAe Meeting
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10. 2005
Page 30 of 142
Page 60f8
Preservation Reauirements:
'Of'ffieI31-acre'slt-e,- onlf50:~acres-siipponnaUvevegelition atiaareusedmffi.e-=-'=---~~"'~
preservation calculation. The remainder of the site consists of disturbed areas and
exotic vegetation.
Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth
Management Plan requires that Twenty~five percent (25%) of the existing native
vegetation be retained on-site and set aside as preserve, and to be proteCted by a
permanent conservation easement to prohibit further' development. The native
vegetation requirement for this site is based on the 56.78 acres of pine flatwoods
and pine/cypress wetlands. A minimum of 14.2 acres of native vegetation is
required to be preserved on site. The project proposes to preserve 14.'9 acres of
native vegetation as well as an additional 20.1 acres of exotic infested areas to be
enha11ced ;md satisfies this requirement.
Listed SDecies:
A listed species survey was conducted on the property on August 1,2003~
November 18 and 20, 2003; December 11,2003; and January 28,2004 by
Passarella and Associates, Inc. The listed species survey 'report is included as
Exhibit J in the ElS. No listed species were observed on the site.
, VII.
RECOMMENDATIONS: ,
Staff recommends approval of Palermo Cove PUD with the following
stipulations:
Stormwater Mana2emeJ1t:
1. Palermo Cove is required to obtain a SFWMD surface water management
permit or equivalent prior to approval of any Site Development plan 'or
Construction Plans and Plat.
Environmental:
No additional stipulations.
EAC Meeting
Page 7 of8
,... ".' PREPAR.ErrErr:'==~'~"~"="~'~'~-~-=""-'-"-'-~""-'-""
.'.. .. -~"~" .....~,~;,.";'". ','.' '. "-. .._..=,,--".~ - -~"-"~~-:-_~~'~-:-.~
c.~
CRISTINA SANCHE
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
Agenda Item No, 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 31 of 142
~
DATE
3J /8106
DATE
ii~
EAe Meeting
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
Page 32 of 142
Page 8 of8
..REVIEWEDu~Y: "
..._..____ ':~~.~ _...~...~,7.'T.:l___,.,,,.........
::':'::""'~><:'~r.:::::m-<~"" '._. ...._.. '_~"" ,.....t,,, "', ~ ......,.~;;.~....~..". __-N" .~............"'~u._.___ .~._..:~_,.._.,.-:-,~,_____, ______:-b.._~~~
BARBARA S. BURGESON
PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
DATE
WllLIAM D. LORENZ, Jr., P.E. DIRECTOR
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE
SUSAN MURRAY, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE
DEP ARTMENT OF ZONlNG AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APPROVED BY:
JOSEPH K. SCHMITT
CO~Y DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATOR
&
DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Dl,{)N
COo'<t'
0.-
c:iN-
Zci'o
E'-~
Q;) >-Q;)
;::ctlOl
ro~ro
"C 0-
c:
Q;)
Ol
<(
~
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 34 of 142
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR:
[gJpUD REZONE (PUDZ)
[JPUD TO PUD REZONE (PUDZ-A)
Date Received:
Plann A ~. ed' RE-SUBMITIAL
er ~Slgn . _ PUDZ-2004-AR..6258
PROJEcr #2004040001
C .. D" DATE: 1211104
omnnsslon lStrict: _ MICHAEL DERUNTZ
Petition No.:
ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF
1 . General Information:
Name of Applicant(s) Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo Cove. Inc.
Applicant's Mailing Address 15100 Collier Boulevard
City
Naples
State
Florida
Zip
34119
Applicant's Telephone # (239) 354-2080
Fax #
(239) 354-2611
Applicant's E-Mail Address:lrina.lZI.een@ebcswfl.com
Name of Agent
Dwight Nadeau
Firm
RWA. Inc.
Agent's Mailing Address
3050 North Horseshoe Drive. Suite 270
City
Naples
State
Florida
Zip
34104
Agent's Telephone #
(239) 649-1509
Fax # (239) 649-7056
Agent's E-Mail Address:
dhn@consult-rwa.com
COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE-NAPLES, FL 34104
PHONE (941) 403-24001FAX (941) 643-6968
ADqllcadoll For Public B_r1all: For PUn Rezoae 8/19103
Name of Agent
Chuck Basinait
Agenda Item No, 8D
Firm Henderson. Fr,lnldin Starnes & ~ .rR.At9~~
Agent's Mailing Address 1715 Monroe StreetJP.O. Box 280
City Ft. Myers
State
Florida
Zip
33901-0280
Agent's Telephone #
(239) 334-4121 Fax #
(239) 334-4100
Agent's E-Mail Address:
charles.basinait@l1enlaw.com
*Be aware that Collier County bas lobbyist regulations. Guide younelf accordingly
and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations.
Complete the following for all Association(s) affiliated with this petition. (Provide additional sheets
if necessary)
Name of Homeowner Association:
Mailing Address
City
State _ Zip
Name of Homeowner Association:
Mailing Address
City
State _ Zip
Name of Homeowner Association:
Mailing Address
City
State _ Zip
Name of Master Association:
Mailing Address
City
State _ Zip
Name of Civic Association:
Mailing Address
City
State _ Zip
2 . Disclosure of Interest Information:
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an lNDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy
in cpmmon, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the
percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets ifnecessary).
ADDllcadoD For Public H_r1DIl For PUD ReaDe 8/29/03
Name and Address
Michael D. Rosenman
Harry B. Rosenman
145 Lake Destinv Trl
Altamonte Sp~. FL 32714-3458
Agenda Item No. 8D
. May 10.2005
Percentage of Ownership Page 36 of 142
Folio # 00203360000
100%
Acreage: 20:l::
Harry Rosenman
Alice McNeese
145 Lake Destiny Trl
Altamonte Sog. FL 32714-3458
Folio # 00203480003
100%
Acreasze: 9.77:l::
Harrv Rosenman
Michael Rosenman
Alice McNeese
145 Lake Destiny Trl
Altamonte Spg. FL 32714-3458
Folio # 00204000000
100%
Acreage: 20:l::
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the
percentage of stock owned by each.
Name and Address. and Office
Harvev Bros. Farms. Inc.
Rodney Harvey
4480 7th Aye NW
N~les. FL ~4119-1528
Percentage of Stock
Folio # 00203760008
100%
Acreage: 20::l::
Elias Brothers Communities at
Palermo Cove. Inc.
15100 Collier Boulevard
Naples. FL 34119
Folio # 00204760900
100%
Acreage: .23:l::
Elias Brothers Communities at
Palermo Cove. Inc.
15100 Collier Boulevard
Nao1es. FL 34119
Folio # 00203920000
100%
Acreage: 10:l::
c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
percentage of interest.
Name and Address
William E. and Norma M. Fleming.
Trustees of the W E & N M Fleming
Rev mv Trust UTD 03/31/95
7771 NW 181st St.
Hialeah. FL 33015-2854
Percentage of Interest
Folio # 00203720006
100%
Acreage: 2O:i:
Eleanor Rosenman. Trustee. of the
Eleanor H. Rosenman Trust
urn 12/20/89
145 Lake Destinv Trl
Folio # 00203400009
100%
AcrealZe: 2O:i:
ADDlleatlon For Public Burial! For PUn RIIzoDe 8/%9/03
Altamonte S02. FL 32714-3458
Agenda Item No, 80
May 10, 2005
Page 37 of 142
Allen M. Rosenman. Trustee
F/B/O Allen M. Rosenman. Trust
urn 12/20/89
145 Lake Destinv Trl
Altamonte Spg. FL 32714-3458
Folio # 00203440001
100%
Acreage: 10::l:
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the
name of the general and/or limited partners.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a
Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below,
including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners.
Name and Address
Elias Brothers Communities at
Palermo Cove. Inc.
15100 Collier Boulevard
Naples. FL 34119
Percentage of Ownership
Folio # 00203360000
Folio # 00203480003
Folio # 00204000000
Folio # 00203760008
Folio # 00203720006
Folio # 00203400009
Folio # 00203440001
100%
Date of Contract: July. 2003
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals
or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust.
Name and Address
g. Date subject property acquired (X) leased ():12/2003 & 2/2004 Term oflease
vrs./mos:
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option:
terminates: , or anticipated closing date
and date option
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the dat
hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on bis behalf, to submit
AUDllcadoD For Public BearlDlf For PUD Rezone 11/29/03
a supplemental disclosure of interest fonn.
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 38 of 142
3. Detailed lel!a1 descriotion of the orooertv covered bv the aDDlleation: (If space is
inadequate, attach on separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning
district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. Applicant
shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months,
maximum 1" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre-application meeting.
NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions
arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be
required.
Section:
34
Township:
48 South
Range:
26 East
Lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Plat Book_ Page #: Property I.D.#:00203360oo0: 00203480003: 00204000000;
00203760008;00203720006:00203400009:00203440001.00203920000. and 00204760900
Metes & Bounds Description: LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL "A"
PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE P ARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SAID SECTION 34, N.89051'50"W., A DISTANCE OF 100.09 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHI'-
OF-WAY OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (S.R. 951) AND BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL
"A" HEREIN DESCRIBED;THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST
1/4, N.89051'50"W., A DISTANCE OF 2544.09 FEET, TO THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE
LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTIIEAST 1/4 AND ALONG TIlE WEST LINE OF THE
SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, N.02015'21 "W., A DISTANCE OF 668.98 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF TIlE SAID NqRTHEAST 1/4; THENCE LEAVING
THE WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 AND ALONG THE NORTIl LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, S;89052'42"E., A DISTANCE OF 1322.11
FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SAID
NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF
THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, S.02015'10"E., A DISTANCE OF 334.65 FEET, TO TIlE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF TIlE NORTH 1/2 OF TIlE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOumEAST 1/4 OF THE SAID
NORTHEAST 1/4;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTIl1l2 OF 1HE SOUTIl1l2 OF THE SOUTIlEAST 1/4
OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, S.89052'16"E., A DISTANCE OF 1222.01 FEET, TO A POINT THE SAID
WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG THE SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY, S.02014'59"E., A
DISTANCE OF 334.80 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL "A" HEREIN DESCRIBED;
CONTAINING 29.7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS; SUBJEcr TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF
RECORD.
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE 1983 NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (1999) ADJUSTMENT STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (GRID) FOR THE FLORIDA EAST ZONE.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED PARCEL "B"
PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
AoullcatioD Por Public: Hearto For PUn Rezone 8/29103
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANb~9z1;~~42
OF COlllER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SAID SECTION 34, N.89051'50"W., A DISTANCE OF 2644.18 FEET, TO '!HE CENTER OF SAID
SECTION 34; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 AND ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTIiEAST 1/4, N.02015'21"W., A DISTANCE OF 668.98 FEET, TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTIi 1/2 OF THE soum 1/2 OF THE NORTIIWEST 1/4 OF SAID
SECI10N 34 AND BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL "B" HEREIN DESCRIBED;
THENCE LEAVING THE WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTIiEAST 1/4 AND ALONG THE soum LINE
OF THE NORTIi 1/2 OF THE SOtITH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECI10N 34,
N.89052'OS''W., A DISTANCE OF 2642.61 FEET, TO THE SOlITHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 1/2
OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF TIlE NORTIlWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34 AND BEING A POINT ON THE
EAST LINE OF ISLANDWALK PHASE FIVE "A", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGES 81
THROUGH 84 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTIlWEST 1/4, N.02013'33"W., A DISTANCE OF 1337.54 FEET, TO THE
SOUTIiWEST CORNER OF INDIGO PRESERVE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 40, PAGES 54
THROUGH 57 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF TRACT "C-3" OF SAID INDIGO PRESERVE, S.89052'34"E., A DISTANCE OF 1320.95
FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "C-3"; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
SAID TRACT "C-3", N.02013'51"W., A DISTANCE OF 668.93 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
TRACT "C-4" OF SAID INDIGO PRESERVE;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "C-4", S.89052'39"E., A DISTANCE OF 1320.65
FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "C-4"; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID TRACT "C-4" AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, S.02015'21 "E., A
DISTANCE OF 2006.93 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL "B" HEREIN DESCRIBED;
CONTAINING 101.3 ACRES, MORE OR LESS; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF
RECORD.
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE 1983 NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (1999) ADruSTMENT STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (GRID) FOR THE FLORIDA EAST ZONE.
4.
Size of property: 2.378ft. X 2.399ft. = Total Sq. Ft. 5.706.360 Acres
131::
5. Address/f!enerallocatioD of subiect property: North of Wolfe Road. east of County Road
951.
6.
PUD District (LDC 2.2.20.4):
~ Residential 0 Community Facilities
o Commercial 0 Industrial
7. Adiacent zonin2 and land use:
Zoning
Land use
N
PUD
Indigo Lakes PUD (developed residential)
S
PUD
Wolfe Creek PUD (undeveloped residential)
E
PUD
Summit Place In Naples RPUD (Partiallv developed residential)
W
PUD
Islandwalk PUD (develooed residential)
MaUallon For Public BearlDI! For roo Rezone 8129f03
Agenda Item No. 80
Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject ~~~~~
so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate,
attach on separate page). NO
Section:
Township: Range:
Lot:
Block: Subdivision:
Plat Book_ Page #: ,
Property 1.0.#:
Metes & Bounds Description:
8. Rezone Reauest: This application is requesting a rezone from the A. Agriculture
zoning district(s) to the RPUD. Residential Planned Unit Development zoning
district( s).
Present Use of the Property:
Undevelo"Oed
Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Residential Sin21e Familv Dwelling Units.
Original PUD Name:
Ordinance No.:
9. Evaluation Criteria: Pursuant to Section 2.7.2.5 and Sec. 2.7.3.2.5 of the Collier County
Land Development Code. staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission,
and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall
be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below. Provide a narrative
statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below.
Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request.
PUD Rezone Considerations rLDC Section 2.7.3.2.5)
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage,
sewer, water, and other utilities.
The proposed RPUD's consistency with the locational criteria set forth on the Future
Land Use Map and supporting Future Land Use Element (FLUE), of the Growth
Management Plan (GMP), and consistency with the applicable Elements related to
access, drainage, water, sewer, and other utilities, combined with the development
conditions and commitments contained in the proposed RPUD document, gives
reasonable assurance that all infrastructure will be developed consistent with County
regulations.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they
may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and
maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at
ADDlIutlo. For Publle Hell".!!: For PUD Raone 1IIZ9/03
, Agenda Item No. 8D
public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made onlY~4110~t9~~
consultation with the county attorney.
The documents, including the Covenant of Unified Control, submitted with this
Petition Application provide evidence of unified control. Further, the proposed
RPUD document makes appropriate provisions for continuing operation and
maintenance of common areas.
3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth
management plan.
Please refer to the Statement of Compliance located in the Palermo Cove RPUD
Document.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and
screening requirements.
The RPUD Master Plan has been designed to optimize internal land use relationships
through the use of various forms of open space sepantion. Additionally, most
external relationships are automatically regulated by the Land Development Code to
ensure harmonious relationships between projects.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
The amount of open space set aside by this proposed project meets or exceeds the
provisions of the Land Development Code.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The timing and sequence of the permitting the proposed development coincides with
the programming of the County's proposed capital improvements to meet
concurrency requirements. Adequate improvements, utilities and other facilities can
be provided.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
Ability, as applied in this context, implies supporting infrastructure such as
wastewater disposal system, potable water supplies, characteristics of the property
relative to hazards, and capacity of roads is supportive of conditions emanating from
urban development. Relative to this Petition, development of the subject property is
timely, because supporting infrastructure are available, or will be in place by the
time permitting of the proposed improvements is complete.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in
the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
ADDlication For Public Hesrill!! For PUD Rezone 8/19/03
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
The development standards in the proposed RPUD document are similalPait Goi'e142
standards used for the residential structures and related improvements when
compared to County regulations. Additionally, to ensure a compact design for
efficiency of infrastructure and perimeter buffering several deviations from the Land
Development Code have been proposed, and are identified on the List of Deviations
attendant to this petition application.
10. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions,
however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the
civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order
to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions.
11. Previous land use petitions on the sublect property: To your knowledge, bas a public
hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that
hearing? No
12. Additional Submittal reouirements: In addition to this completed application, the following
shall be submitted in order for your application to be deemed sufficient, unless otherwise
waived during the pre-application meeting.
a. A copy of the pre-application meeting notes;
b. If this rezone is being requested for a specific use, provide twenty (20) copies (this
includes: HUI if affordable housing, Joyce Ernst, if residential and ImmokaleelWater
Sewer District, if in Immokalee) ofa 24" x 36" conceptual site plan [and one reduced 8W'
x 11" copy of site plan], drawn to a maximum scale of 1 inch equals 400 feet, depicting
the following [Additional copies of the plan may be requested upon completion of staff
evaluation for distribution to the Board and various advisory boards such as the
Environmental Advisory Board (BAB), or cepC];
. all existing and proposed structures and the dimensions thereof,
. provisions for existing and/or proposed ingress and egress (including pedestrian
ingress and egress to the site and the structure(s) on site),
. all existing and/or proposed parking and loading areas [include matrix indicating
required and provided parking and loading, including required parking for the
disabled],
. required yards, open space and preserve areas,
. proposed locations for utilities (as well as location of existing utility services to the
site),
. proposed and/or existing landscaping and buffering as may be required by the County,
c. An architectural rendering of any proposed structures.
Aoolil:ation For Public Burio!! For PUD Rezone 8129/03
Agenda Item No. aD
. . . May 10, 2005
d. An Envrronmental Impact Statement (EIS), as required by Section 3.8. OES*48audl42
Development Code (LDC) , or a request for waiver if appropriate.
e. Whether or not an EIS is required, two copies of a recent aerial photograph, (taken within
the previous twelve months), minimum scale of one inch equals 400 feet, shall be
submitted. Said aerial shall identify plant and/or wildlife habitats and their boundaries.
Such identification shall be consistent with Florida Department of Transportation Land
Use Cover and Forms Classification System. Additionally, a calculation of the acreage
(or square feet) of native vegetation on site, by area, and a calculation and location(s) of
the required portion of native vegetation to be preserved (per LDC Section 3.9.5.5.4.).
f. Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments and sketches);
g. A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), unless waived at the pre-application meeting;
h. A historical and archeological surveyor waiver application if property is located within
an area of historical or archaeological probability (as identified at pre-application
meeting);
1. Any additional requirements as may be applicable to specific conditional uses and
identified during the pre-application meeting, including but not limited to any required
state or federal permits.
J. An electronic version of the PUD on a disk as part of this submittal package.
k. BoUndary Survey, no more than six months old - LDC Section 2.7.3.1.2.(8)
Please be advised that Section 2.7.2.3.2 (3) of the Land Development Code requires
an applicant to remove their public hearing advertising sign (5) after final action is
taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's fmal action on
this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign (s) immediately.
Annllcatlon For Public H_riM For PUD Rezone 8/29103
Agenda Item No. aD
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REOUE~gr:; 4~O~t~~~
1.
NAME OF APPLICANT:
Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo Cove. Inc.
2.
MAILING ADDRESS:
15100 Collier Boulevard
CITY
Naples
STATE Florida
ZIP
34119
, 3. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF A V All..ABLE):
4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Section:
34
Township: 48 South
Range:
26 East
Lot:
Block:
Subdivision
Plat Book Page #: Property I.D.#: 00203360000~ 00203480003~
00204000000: 00203760008~00203720006:00203400009:00203440001.00203920000.and
00204760900
Metes & Bounds Description:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL" A"
PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE P ARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SmITH, RANGE 26 EAST,
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SAID SEcnON 34, N.89051'50"W., A DISTANCE OF 100.09 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-
OF-WAY OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (S.R. 951) AND BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL
"A" HEREIN DESCRIBED;THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST
114, N.89051'50"W., A DISTANCE OF 2544.09 FEET, TO THE CENTER OF SAID SECI10N 34; THENCE
LEA VlNG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE
SAID NORTIIEAST 1/4, N.02015'21"W., A DISTANCE OF 668.98 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE LEAVING
THE WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 114 AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, S.89052'42"E., A DISTANCE OF 1322.11
FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUI'HWEST 114 OF THE SAID
NORTHEAST 114; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF
THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, S.02015'10"E., A DISTANCE OF 334.65 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF THE NORTH 112 OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUI'HEAST 114 OF THE SAID
NORTHEAST 114;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 112 OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114
OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 114, S.89052'16"E., A DISTANCE OF 1222.01 FEET, TO A POINT THE,SAID
WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG THE SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY, S.02014'59"E., A
DISTANCE OF 334.80 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNlNG OF PARCEL "A" HEREIN DESCRIBED;
CONTAINING 29.7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF
RECORD.
~DDllcatioD For PubUc BelIriDII For PUB RaoDe 8/29103
/
Agenda Item No, 8D
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE 1983 NORlH AMERlCAN DATIJM (1999) ADJUS~ "dt~~
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (GRID) FOR THE FLORIDA EAST ZONE.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED PARCEL "B"
PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 soum, RANGE 26 EAST, COllIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SAID SECTION 34, N.89051'50"W., A DISTANCE OF 2644.18 FEET, TO THE CENTER OF SAID
SECTION 34; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 AND ALONG TIm
WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, N.02015'21 "W., A DISTANCE OF 668.98 FEET, TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID
SECTION 34 AND BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL "B" HEREIN DESCRIBED;
THENCE LEAVING THE WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 AND ALONG THE soum LINE
OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34,
N.89052'05"W., A DISTANCE OF 2642.61 FEET, TO THE SOUlllWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 1/2
OF THE soum 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34 AND BEING A POINT ON THE
EAST LINE OF ISLANDWALK PHASE FIVE "A", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGES 81
THROUGH 84 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; TIIENCE ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHWEST 1/4, N.02013'33"W., A DISTANCE OF 1337.54 FEET, TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF INDIGO PRESERVE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 40, PAGES 54
THROUGH 57 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF TRACT "C-3" OF SAID INDIGO PRESERVE, S.89052'34"E., A DISTANCE OF'1320.95
FEET, TO THE SOUTIlEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "C-3"; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
SAID TRACT "C-3", N.02013'51"W., A DISTANCE OF 668.93 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
TRACT "C-4" OF SAID INDIGO PRESERVE;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "C-4", S.89052'39"E., A DISTANCE OF 1320.65
FEET, TO THE SOurHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "C-4"; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID TRACT "C-4" AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, S.02015'21 "E., A
DISTANCE OF 2006.93 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL "B" HEREIN DESCRIBED;
CONTAINING 101.3 ACRES, MORE OR LESS; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF
RECORD.
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE 1983 NORTH AMERICAN DATIJM (1999) ADJUSTMENT STATE
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (GRID) FOR 1HE FLORIDA EAST ZONE.
5 . TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED (Check applicable system):
a. COUNTY UTll..ITY SYSTEM it~ ' t8J
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM 0
c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM D
PROVIDE NAME
d. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT D
(GPD capacity)
e. SEPTIC SYSTEM 0
6.
TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED:
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
c. FRANCHISED UTaITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL)
t8J
D
o
D
ADDUcation For PubUc HearlDI! For PUD RezoDe 8/19/03
7.
TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED:
948.44 (524*1.81)
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10. 2005
Paqe 46 of 142
8. PEAK.AND AVERAGE DAILY DEMANDS:
A. WATER-PEAK 268.07 GPM AVERAGE DAILY 175.461.4 GPD CLOS: 185)
B. SEWER-PEAK. 240.1 GPM AVERAGE DA.ll.Y , 137.523.8 GPD CLOS: 145)
Peak = Average Dally X 2.2 peak factor + 1440 minutes
9. IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL
WATER SYSTEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE
REQUIRED: First Ouarter 2006.
10. NARRATIVE STATEMENT: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic
drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the
method of affiuent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation
data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional
engineer.
11. COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the project is located
within the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, vvritten notarized
statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier COlmty Utilities the water
distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the
construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at
the at time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system
development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to
the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain shall
contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and
sewer systems.
12. STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS: Unless
waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive
sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from
that provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided.
Utility Pro~on Statement RJM 10117/97
ADDneaUen For Public HearlBI! For PUD Rezone 11/29/03
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
PUD REZONE APPLICATION Page 47 of 142
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET!
REQUIREMENTS #OF NOT
COPIE REQUIRED REQUIRED
S
1. Completed ApplicationIPUD documents 24* X
2. Copy ofDeed(s) and list identifying Owner(s) and all Partners 2* X
if a Corooration
3. Completed Owner/ Agent Affidavit, Notarized 2* X
4. Pre-application notes/minutes 24* X
5. Conceptual Site Plans 24* X
6. Environmental Impact Statement - (EIS) 4 X
7. Aerial Photograph - (with habitat areas identified) 5* X
8. Completed Utility Provisions Statement (with required 4
attachments and sketches)
9. Traffic Impact Statement - (I1S) 7 X
10. Historical & Archaeological Surveyor Waiver Application 4
11. Copies of State and/or Federal Permits 4 X
12. Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s) 4
13. [8JApplication Fee - "PUD Rezone" = 510,000 + 525 per acre X
~Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review = $2,250
o Application Fee - "PUD to PUD Rezone" - 58000
Fire Code Review = 5150
EIS Review = $1600
Check shall be made payable to:
Collier Countv Board of Commissioners
14. An electronic version of the PUD on a disk as part of the X
submittal packet.
15. Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement including aU 4
Appendices and Exhibits.
16. Boundary Survey (no more than 6 months old) 5 X
17. OTHER REQUIREMENTS:
* Documents required for Long-Range Planning Review *1 additional copy if for affordable housing
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the infOIID8tion indicated on this checklist is included
in this submittal package. I understand that failur to include all necessary submittal infmmation may result in the delay of
processing this petition.
fj( 8~1
I Datb
AOOUCatiOD For Public BeariaR Per PUD Re:zoBe 8/19103
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 48 of 142
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT (TIS):
A TIS is required unless waived at the pre-application meeting. The TIS required may be either a
major or minor as determined at the pre-application meeting. Please note the following with regard to
TIS submittals:
MINOR TIS: Generally required for rezone requests for property less than 10 acres in size, although
based on the intensity or unique character of a petition, a major TIS may be required for petition of
ten acres or less.
MAJOR TIS: Required for all other rezone requests.
A minor TIS shall include the following:
1.
Trip Generation:
(at build-out)
Annual Average Daily Traffic
Peak: Hour (AADT)
Peak Season Daily Traffic
Peak: Hour (PSDT)
2. Trip Assignment: Within Radius of Development Influence (RDI)
3.
Existing Traffic:
Within RDI
AADT Volumes
PSDT Volumes
Level of Service (LOS)
4. Impact of the proposed use on affected major thoroughfares, including any anticipated changes in
level of service (LOS).
5. Any proposed improvements (to the site or the external right-of-way) such as providing or
eliminating an ingress/egress point, or providing turn or decellanes or other improvements.
6. Describe any proposal to mitigate the negative impacts on the transportation system.
7. For Rezones Only: State how this request is consistent with the applicable policies of the
Traffic Circulation Element(TCE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), including policies
, 1.3, 1.4,4.4,5.1,5.2, 7.2 and 7.3.
A Major TIS shall address all of the items listed above (for a Minor TIS, and shall also include
an analysis of the fonowing:
1. Intersection Analysis
2. Background Traffic
3. Future Traffic
4. Through Traffic
5. PlannedlProposed Roadway Improvements
6. Proposed Schedule (phasing) of Development
AOOUeatiOD For Public: Hearln2 For PUD Rezone 11/29/03
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 49 of 142
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT mS) STANDARDS:
The following standards shall be used in preparing a TIS for submittal in conjunction with a
conditional use or rezone petition:
1. TriD Generation: Provide the total traffic generated by the project for each link within the
project's Radius of Development Influence (RDI) in conformance with the acceptable traffic
engineering principles. The rates published in the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Report shall be used unless documentation by the petitioner or
the County justifies the use of alternative rates.
2. Trio Assi2llment: Provide a map depicting the assignment to the network. of those trips
generated by the proposed project. The assignment shall be made to all links within the RDI. Both
annual average and peak: seasonal traffic should be depicted.
3. Existinl! Traffic: Provide a map depicting the current traffic conditions on all links within the
RDI. The AADT, PSDT, and LOS shall be depicted for all links within the RDI.
4. Level of Service (LOS): The LOS of a roadway shall be expressed in terms of the applicable
Collier County Generalized Daily Service Volumes as set forth in the TCE of the G!\.1P.
5. Radius of DeveloDment Influence CRDD: The TIS shall cover the least of the following two
areas:
a) an area as set forth below; or,
b) the area in which traffic assignments from the proposed project on the major
thoroughfares exceeds one percent of the LOS "C".
Land Use
Distance
Residential
5 Miles or as required by DR!
Other (commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.)
o - 49, 999 Sq. Ft. 2 Miles
50,000 - 99, 999 Sq. Ft. 3 Miles
100,000 - 199,999 Sq. Ft. 4 Miles
200,000 - 399, 999 Sq. Ft 5 Miles
400,000 & up 5 Miles
In describing the RDI the TIS shall provide the measurement in road miles from the proposed
project rather than a geometric radius.
6. IDtersection Analvsis: An intersection analysis is required for all intersections within the RDI
where the sum of the peak-hour critical lane volume is projected to exceed 1,200 Vehicles Per
Hour (VPH).
ADnllcatiuD For Public HearlDll For PUD Rezone 8/29/03
Agenda Item No. 80
7. Background Traffic: The effects of previously approved but undeveloped ~~~~~~
developed projects which may affect major thoroughfares within the RDI of the proposed
project shall be provided. This information shall be depicted on a map or, alternatively, in a
listing of those projects and their respective characteristics.
8. Future Traffic: An estimate of the effects of traditional increases in traffic resulting from
potential development shall be provided. Potential development is that which may be
developed maximally under the effective Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and the Collier
County Land Development Code. This estimate shall be for the projected development areas
within the projects RDI. A map or list of such lands with potential traffic impact calculations
shall be provided.
9. Throu2h Traffic: At a minimum, increases in through traffic shall be addressed through the
year 2015. The methodology used to derive the estimates shall be provided. It may be
desirable to include any additional documentation and backup data to support the estimation
as well.
10. PlannedIProDosed Roadwav Imorovements: All proposed or planned roadway
improvements located within the RDI should be identified. A description of the funding
commitments shall also be included.
11. Proiect Phasin2: When a project phasing schedule is dependent upon proposed roadway
improvements, a phasing schedule may be included as part of the TIS. If the traffic impacts of
a project are mitigated through a phasing schedule, such a phasing schedule may be made a
condition of any approval.
NOTICE:
This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made
and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered
"closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supplY
necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning for a period of
six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an
application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed"
may be re-opened by submitting a new application, repayment of all application fees and granting of a
determination of "sufficiency",. Further review of the project will be subject to the then current code.
(LDC Section 2.2.20.2.3)
ADDUcatton For PubUc Hearlnll For PUD Rezone 8/1'103
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 51 of 142
(i)
RE-SUBMI1T AL
PUDZ.ZOO4.AR-6258
PROJECT 11%004040001
DATE: 1211104
MICHAELDERUNTZ
AFFIDA VIT
L Ovadia R. Elias, President of Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo Cove, Inc. being first
duly sworn, depose and say that Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo Cove, Inc. is the
contract purchaser of the property described herein, and which is the subject matter of the
proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the
disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to
and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate
and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be
significantly altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed
complete, and all required in ation has been submitted.
t)Y({. dl t. 1(-0 ~,
Signature of Contract Purchaser
CNa./l.z" ~ KOtti.. ~ flU
Typed or Printed Name of
Contract Purchaser
Theforego~was acknowledged bifore me this .:a"" day qf ~.
200~ b ' ~ !~ who is personally known to me or produced
as identification.
State of Florida
County of Collier
~~
Florida)
l~~~ Kathleen Champion
~ ~ MY COMMISSION # DD15<<69 EXPIRES
':!'A; September 30. 2006
' "-Y;nr.:.' IlONDEllTHRUTlOYFAIN IHS1JIWfCt INC
(print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
QLnN
COO.q<
_.OT""
,N_
.0
_ ;::N
c: Ln
!!l ~ Q)
~::?: 16'
-g 0-
m
O'l
~
ClCI
\I)
N
ClCI
I
IX:
-<
I
"'"
C)
C)
N
I
N
.-....- I Z- 0
- :J
D..
"*'
I. I I. t z
:! 0
~ II j:
III - II i :lIt Ii:! i=!
i I I I I ~I
I
I t I
;!: I~ Q..
R ..Ii ::=Ii
I I i li:t <(
-..rIIlllI _ "1I'll I il ~
I ' ; I I. z
"f !! I~ C
Ii ' Ii
I I -
I-
.;1 I <(
I ~ dId I Ii A h . II I, I ~ t)
r; ~ . I · ,Ii .. Iii I I ~ Iii C
----- I ...J
I~ t I- It" I.
II t: fl III Ii Illi ~"
5- I I I~ t:li
ICILIIILIIIl I
..-I.LV_
8'!D AMW'DD ..IDl ... IDIIWJI I~
,,-I.LV_
.....'''"'-.......... '._-
Q..
<(
~
W
I-
-
en
~~lAI\ ._
"C~;~ " ,."~, '; "'" :'
..wflACl
,~..
I (I
,@..~.
,~,.~,
g;.,.~
a'.~,
f...)r/j
o~
~.:?:
~g k'
~'.'~ 'HI
~k,i
if A I
lId.
. <I .~',.. .~.
.,'1.... ;..!.J~'
,I1tiiJif '
'."t :1'1.', :~I;.H..'I
It,.,',
"Iii '. ,!
-1.1, IJ Jl
...Ill.,i.,... ..l.I, '..,..11.,:,11,1.
1,11.0._., ·
1:1 'If: , ,
h,t.l.. lira:
_..,..,....ilII~
.MI!Iir~ .' .. '.' ......,
$WlrJWD-.nw _ +:::~~..::, ..:; ~
--."
d V U i18lHX3
r
"'.~i'.
III
.I},~.'l.i
" ..,..
J
.'11
II; '.
~)...
I Ill.
~......... '.-.f
~=r
'I
r
I~
~ is
,
!
... I
"f
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 54 of 142
ORDINANCE NO. 05-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER
2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE wmCH INCLUDES THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULA nONS FOR THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING
ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICA nON OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURE (A)
ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) WNING
DlSTRICI' TO BE KNOWN AS PALERMO COVE
RPUD LOCATED NORTH OF WOLFE ROAD, WEST OF
COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951), IN SECTION 34,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOurH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 131:t ACRES; AND
BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau, of RWA, Inc. and Chuck Basinait, of Henderson,
Franklin, Starnes & Hoh, P.A., representing Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo
Cove, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of
the herein described real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 34,
Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is chBllged from the Rural
Agriculture (A) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)
zoning district to be known as the Palermo Cove RPUD in accordance with the Palermo
Cove RPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incoIllOl'&ted by reference herein.
The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as
amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, are hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, this _ day of
,2005.
I of 2
ATTEST:
DWIGlIT E. BROCK, CLERK
Approved as to Form
and Legal Sufficiency
MBIjorie M. Student
Assistant County Attorney
PUDZ-2004-AR-62S8IMJD11p
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLmR COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
2 of 2
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 55 of 142
,.:._-~~.-.,
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 56 of 142
PALERMO COVE RPUD
A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN
GOVERNING PALERMO COVE RPUD,
A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO
PROVISIONS OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
PREPARED FOR:
ELIAS BROTHERS COMMUNITIES AT PALERMO COVE, INC.
15100 COLLIER BOULEVARD
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34119
PREPARED BY:
UWT^NC.
CONSULTING
.......... Y y.J.. .....
3050 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
SUI TE 270
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
And
HENDERSON, FRANKLIN, STARNES & HOLT, P.A.
1715 MONROE STREET
P.O. BOX 280
FT. MYERS, FL 33901-0280
DA TE REVIEWED BY CCPC
DATE APPROVED BY BCC
ORDINANCE NUMBER
AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL
Exhibit "A"
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 57 of 142
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Exhibits and Tables
Statement of Compliance 11
Section I Property Ownership and Description I-I
Section II Project Development Requirements II-I
Table I 11-2
Section III Residential Development Standards III-I
Table II III-3
Section IV Recreation Area IV-I
Section V Preserve Area V-I
Section VI Development Commitments VI-l
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove POO 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10. 2005
Page 58 of 142
LIST OF EXHIBITS. TABLES. AND APPENDICES
EXHIBIT "A"
RPUD MASTER PLAN
EXHIBIT "B"
BOUNDARY SURVEY
EXHIBIT "c"
VICINITY MAP
TABLE I
PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS
TABLE II
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
APPENDIX "A"
TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS
APPENDIX "B"
CONCEPTUAL WATER MANAGEMENT
PLAN
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 59 of 142
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The development of approximately 131 acres of property in Collier County, Florida as a
Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to be known as the Palermo Cove RPUD shall
comply with the goals, objectives and policies of Collier County as set forth in the Growth
Management Plan (GMP). The residential and recreational facilities of Palermo Cove RPUD are
consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive
planning objectives of each of the elements of the GMP for the following reasons.
1. The subject property for development is within the Urban (Urban Mixed-Use District,
Urban Residential Sub-district) as identified on the Future Land Use Map as provided for
in Objective 1 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP, and the uses
contemplated are consistent therewith.
2. The project is proposed to be a residential development located within the Urban (Urban
Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Sub-district), as identified on the Future Land Use
Map from the FLUE, of the Collier County GMP. The Density Rating System of the
FL UE provides for a base density of four (4) dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed
density of Palermo Cove RPUD is 4.0 units per gross acre, or 524 units, and is therefore
consistent with the FLUE, Policy 5.1. of the Collier County GMP.
3. The development standards contained in this Document, combined with the requirements
of the Land Development Code (LDC) will insure that the proposed development will be
compatible with and complementary to existing and planned surrounding land uses as
required by Policy 5.4 of the FLUE.
4. The development commitments and standards contained in this Document, as well as the
requirements of the LDC will assure compliance with Policy 3.1 of the FLUE.
5. The Palermo Cove RPUD is consistent with and furthers Policy 5.5 of the FLUE in that it
is using existing land zoned (designated) for urban uses.
6. The Palermo Cove RPUD implements Policy 5.6 of the FLUE in that more than 60% of
the project will be open space or reserved for conservation purposes.
7. The Master Development Plan, with its extensive natural area, lakes and open space
areas, and with its low residential density, will insure that the developed project will be
an attractive and enjoyable residential development.
8. The project shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 6.02. of the LDC, and therefore,
it will implement, and further Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element.
ii
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10. 2005
Page 60 of 142
SECTION I
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and
to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the
project name of the Palermo Cove RPUD.
1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL "A"
PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE
26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG
THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34,
N.89051'50"W., A DISTANCE OF 100.09 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE WEST
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (S.R. 951) AND BEING THE POINT
OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL "A" HEREIN DESCRIBED;THENCE CONTINUE
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, N.89051'50"W., A
DISTANCE OF 2544.09 FEET, TO THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE
LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 AND ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, N.02015'21"W., A DISTANCE OF
668.98 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE LEAVING THE WEST
LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4,
S.89052'42"E., A DISTANCE OF 1322.11 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4
OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, S.02015'10"E., A DISTANCE OF 334.65 FEET, TO
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE
SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4;
I-I
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo eove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 61 of 142
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF
THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, S.89052'16"E., A
DISTANCE OF 1222.01 FEET, TO A POINT THE SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY;
THENCE ALONG THE SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY, S.02014'59"E., A DISTANCE
OF 334.80 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL "A" HEREIN
DESCRIBED;
CONTAINING 29.7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD.
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE 1983 NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (1999)
ADJUSTMENT STATE PLANE COORDINA TE SYSTEM (GRID) FOR THE
FLORIDA EAST ZONE.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED PARCEL "B"
PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE
26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG
THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34,
N.89051'50"W., A DISTANCE OF 2644.18 FEET, TO THE CENTER OF SAID
SECTION 34; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST
1/4 AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4,
N.02015'21"W., A DISTANCE OF 668.98 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID
SECTION 34 AND BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL "B" HEREIN
DESCRIBED; THENCE LEAVING THE WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST
1/4 AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF
THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34, N.89052'05"W., A DISTANCE OF
2642.61 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE
SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34 AND BEING A
POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF ISLANDW ALK PHASE FIVE "A", AS RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGES 81 THROUGH 84 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SAID
NORTHWEST 1/4, N.02013'33"W., A DISTANCE OF 1337.54 FEET, TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF INDIGO PRESERVE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK
40, PAGES 54 THROUGH 57 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT "C-3" OF SAID
INDIGO PRESERVE, S.89052'34"E., A DISTANCE OF 1320.95 FEET, TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "C-3"; THENCE ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID TRACT "C-3", N.02013'51 "W., A DISTANCE OF 668.93 FEET, TO
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "C-4" OF SAID INDIGO PRESERVE;
1-2
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palenno Cove PUD\Palenno eove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10. 2005
Page 62 of 142
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "C-4", S.89052'39"E., A
DISTANCE OF 1320.65 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT
"C-4"; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "C-4" AND
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, S.02015'21 "E., A
DISTANCE OF 2006.93 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL "B"
HEREIN DESCRIBED;
CONTAINING 101.3 ACRES, MORE OR LESS; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD.
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE 1983 NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (1999)
ADJUSTMENT ST ATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (GRID) FOR THE
FLORIDA EAST ZONE.
1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
The subject property is owned by:
Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo Cove, Inc. (Folio Nos. 00204760900, and
00203920000).
Elias Brother Communities at Palermo Cove, Inc. have the following properties under
contract for purchase:
Eleanor H. Rosenman Trust
Harry Rosenman
Norma M. Fleming Trust
Harvey Brothers Farms, Inc.
Allen M. Rosenman Trust
Michael D. Rosenman
(Folio No. 00203400009);
(Folio Nos. 00204000000, and 00203480003);
(Folio No. 00203720006);
(Folio No. 00203760008);
(Folio No. 00203440001), and
(Folio No. 00203360000).
1.4 DEVELOPER
The Palermo Cove RPUD is intended to be developed by Elias Brothers Communities at
Palermo Cove, Inc. All reference to the "developer" as may be contained in this RPUD
Document shall mean Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo Cove Inc., unless, and
until the subject property described and depicted in this RPUD Document is sold. It is
the responsibility of Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo Cove, Inc. to notify Collier
County, in writing, of the land conveyance, of the subject property described and
depicted in this RPUD Document within six months of the actual conveyance.
1-3
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 63 of 142
1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
The development property is located in the east half of Section 34, Township 48 South,
Range 26 East. The proposed project site is presently undeveloped, but portions of the
property have been disturbed by clearing and off-road vehicle use. Historically timbering
and cattle grazing have occurred on the property. The property's jurisdictional wetlands
have been infested with the exotic species Melaleuca. The property is generally without
topographic relief, with elevations ranging from 12.4 feet to 13.7 feet above mean sea
level. The site contains areas of jurisdictional wetlands that are characterized as
transitional wetlands in which the predominant vegetation is a mix of pine and cypress
and associated upland and wetland plants with a mixture of Melaleuca.
The water management system consists of approximately 10 acres of water management
areas that will receive run-off from structures and parking areas. Run-off will be
collected by catch basins and culvert systems for conveyance to the project's internal lake
system. The lakes are interconnected by culverts and/or the preserve areas, with project
outfall being at the project's southwest comer. Discharge will be into the wetland
preserve in the southwest portion of the project site. Flow will continue overland to
eventually be co lIected into the Islandwalk water management system, with ultimate
discharge into the 1-75 Canal in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 90-10, as
amended, which incorporates the Harvey Basin Study.
1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Palermo Cove RPUD shall be a residential development consisting of detached
single-family villas and attached single-family villa residences. The amenities proposed
to be provided in the project include structures and areas to provide social and
recreational space, lakes, natural and landscaped open spaces, and a variety of passive
and active recreational opportunities. It is anticipated that the project will have a single
clubhouse tract that will be developed with the actual clubhouse and outdoor recreational
improvements including swimming pools, tennis courts, a playground, and potentially a
basketball court and volley ball court.
The property will be accessed by Wolfe Road on the west side of Collier Boulevard.
That segment of Collier Boulevard between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee
Road is planned to be improved with a six-lane divided roadway, programmed to
commence construction in 2005 (Capital Road Project #65061).
Each residential unit shall be served with centrally provided potable water, sanitary
sewer, electric power, and telephone. Additional services shall be provided as deemed
appropriate.
1.7 SHORT TITLE
This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Palermo Cove Residential Planned Unit
Development Ordinance".
1-4
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 64 of 142
SECTION n
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
2.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of
development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of
the Palermo Cove RPUD development, as well as other project relationships.
2.2 GENERAL
A. Regulations for development of the Palermo Cove RPUD shall be in accordance
with the contents of this Document, the RPUD-Planned Unit Development
District - and other applicable sections and other applicable sections and parts of
the Collier County LDC and GMP in effect at the time of building permit
application. Where these RPUD regulations fail to provide developmental
standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the County LDC shall
apply.
B. This RPUD Document and attendant RPUD Master Plan is tailored to provide
specific development standards for the residential product proposed by the
developer.
C. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the
definitions set forth in the Collier County LDC in effect at the time of building
permit application.
D. All conditions imposed and all graphic material presented depicting restrictions
for the development of the Palermo Cove RPUD shall become part of the
regulations that govern the manner in which the RPUD site may be developed.
E. Unless modified, waived or deviated from by this RPUD, the provisions of other
sections of the LDC, where applicable, remain in full force and effect with respect
to the development of the land that comprises this RPUD.
F. Development permitted by the approval of this petition shall be subject to a
concurrency review under the provisions of Chapter 6.02., Adequate Public
Facilities, of the County LDC.
2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND LAND USE TRACTS
A. The project Master Plan, including layout of streets, sidewalks, pedestrian trails
and use of land is illustrated graphically by Exhibit "A", RPUD Master Plan.
II-I
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No, 80
May 10, 2005
Page 65 of 142
TABLE I
PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS
TYPE UNITS/FT. ACREAGE:t
TRACT .oR" RESIDENTIAL 524 90
TRACT "RA" RECREATION AREA 0 3
TRACT "P" PRESERVE 0 38
B. Areas illustrated as lakes on Exhibit "A" shall be constructed as lakes or, upon
approval, parts thereof may be constructed as shallow, intermittent wet and dry
depressions for water retention purposes. Such areas shall be in the same general
configuration and contain the same general acreage as shown by Exhibit "A".
Minor modification to all tracts, lakes or other boundaries may be permitted at the
time of final plat or site development plan approval, subject to the provisions of
Sections 10.02.03. and 10.02.05. respectively, of the Collier County LDC, or as
otherwise permitted by this RPUD Document.
C. In addition to the various areas and specific items shown on Exhibit "A", such
easements as necessary (utility, private, semi-private) shall be established within
or along the various tracts as may be necessary.
2.4 MAXIMUM PROJECT DENSITY
A maximum of 524 residential dwelling units (including attached and detached single-
family villas), may be constructed in the total project area. The gross project area is
approximately 131 acres. The gross project density, therefore, shall be a maximum of 4.0
dwelling units per acre.
2.5 PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Prior to final local development order issuance for all or part of the RPUD, final
plans of all required improvements shall receive approval of the appropriate
Collier County governmental agency to insure compliance with the LDC.
B. Exhibit "A", RPUD Master Plan, constitutes the required RPUD Development
Plan. Any division of property and the development of the land shall be in
compliance with Section 10.02.04. of the Collier County LDC, and the platting
laws of the State of Florida.
C. The provisions of Section 10.02.03. of the Collier County LDC, when applicable,
shall apply to the development of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided
in said Division prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development
order
II-2
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
Page 66 of 142
D. Appropriate instruments shall be provided at the time of infrastructure
improvements regarding any dedications and methods for providing perpetual
maintenance of common facilities.
E. No side-yards shall be required between units, where multiple units, intended for
fee simple conveyance, including each individual lot, are contained in a single
principal structure.
2.6 LAKE SETBACK AND EXCAVATIONS
A. Lake setbacks shall conform with the requirements described in Section 22-l22(a)
of Ordinance No. 04-55, of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances.
Lakes may be excavated to the maximum commercial excavation depths set forth
in Section 22-112(c) of Ordinance No. 04-55, of the Collier County Code of Laws
and Ordinances. Removal of fill from the Palermo Cove RPUD shall be limited
to an amount up to ten percent (10%) (to a maximum 20,000 cubic yards), of the
total volume excavated unless a commercial excavation permit is received.
2.7 RIGHTS-OF-WAY
A. All platted project streets shall have a minimum 50-foot right-of-way. Deviation
1 from Sub-section 6.06.01(0) of the LDC, for cul-de-sac and local streets, and
LDC Appendix B, (Section III of the proposed Construction Standards Manual
intended to be adopted as part of the County's Administrative Code), Typical
Street Section, B-4 and B-5 which requires 60 feet to allow 50 feet. (See
Appendix "A", Typical Cross Sections, and Exhibit A, RPUD Master Plan).
These streets shall be private, and shall be classified as local streets.
B. Utilization of areas within all project rights-of-way for landscaping, decorative
entranceways, and signage may be allowed subject to review and administrative
approval by the Collier County Community Development and Environmental
Services Administrator, .or his designee, for engineering and safety considerations
prior to installation.
C. Tangents between reverse curves are not required for any local street design in
this RPUD. Deviation 2 from Section III P. 10. of the proposed Construction
Standards Manual intended to be adopted as part of the County's Administrative
Code.
B-3
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo eove PUD\Palermo eove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 67 of 142
2.8 AMENDMENTS TO RPUD DOCUMENT OR RPUD MASTER PLAN
Changes and amendments may be made to this RPUD Document or RPUD Master
Development Plan, Exhibit "A", as provided for in Subsection 10.02.13.E. of the Collier
County LDC. Minor changes and refinements as described in Subsection 6.3.C. of this
RPUD Document may be made in connection with any type of development or permit
application required by the Collier County LDC.
2.9 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREAS & FACILITIES
Easements shall be provided for water management areas, rights-of-way, and utilities.
All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the
continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable
regulations in effect at the time of adoption of this Ordinance establishing the Palermo
Cove RPUD.
Whenever the developer elects to create land area and/or recreation amenities whose
ownership and maintenance responsibility is a common interest to all of the subsequent
purchasers of residential units or real property within the Palermo Cove RPUD, the
developer shall provide appropriate legal instruments for the establishment of a property
owners' association, or master condominium association whose function shall include
provision for the perpetual care and maintenance of all common facilities and open space,
subject further to the provisions of Section 10.02.13.L. of the Collier County LDC.
2.10 MODEL, SALES, AND CONSTRUCTION OPERATION FACILITIES
A. Models, sales/rental centers and other uses and structures related to the promotion
and sale and/or rental of real estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions, viewing
platforms, gazebos, parking areas, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses
throughout the Palermo Cove RPUD subject to the requirements of Chapter
5.04.04. of the Collier County LDC.
B. Temporary use permits for sales centers, and model homes may be approved
subsequent to zoning approval, and prior to final plat approval, subject to the
provisions of Subsection 5.04.04.B.5.c. of the LDC. However, Palermo Cove
may have one model home representing each type of residential product. The
number of model homes may exceed five, but shall not exceed a total of eight.
Deviation 3 from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c. that limits the total number of
model homes in a single development to five.
C. Temporary use permit applications, and associated site development plan (SDP)
application(s) for residential models, may be submitted concurrently with
applications for improvement plans to depict the location of the model units
within a future platted lot. All model units shall be located on lots that shall be
platted through subsequent development order approvals.
II-4
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo eove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-t9-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 3D
May 10, 2005
Page 68 of 142
D. Temporary uses for sales centers may be served by temporary well and septic
systems.
E. A portion of the clubhouse facilities may be used as a penn anent sales facility to
be utilized to market residential products, including the re-sale of residences
within the boundaries of the Palenno Cove RPUD.
2.11 CLUBHOUSE
Construction approvals for the clubhouse and related common recreational facilities may
be approved subsequent to zoning approval, but not prior to approval of the final plat by
the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Sub-section 10.02.04. AA.d. of the
LOC. The clubhouse and related facilities may be submitted for concurrent review with
the plans and plat, but remain subject to the above-referenced approval requirement of the
LOC.
2.12 FILL STORAGE
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4.06.04. of the Collier County LDC, fill
storage is generally pennitted as a temporary principal use throughout the Palermo Cove
RPUD. Fill material generated may be stockpiled within areas designated for residential
development. Prior to stockpiling in these locations, a vegetation removal and site filling
penn it, along with plans showing the locations and cross-sections shall be submitted to
Collier County Planning Services Staff for review and approval. The following standards
shall apply:
A. Stockpile maximum side slope: 3: I
B. Stockpile maximum height: thirty-five (35) feet
C. Fill storage areas shall be screened with a security fence at least six (6) feet in
height above ground level. If fill is spread to a height less than five feet over
residential development areas that are depicted on an approved SDP, or approved
subdivision improvement plans, no fencing is required.
O. Soil erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Subsection 10.0.02.C. of
the LDC.
E. Fill storage shall not be pennitted in preserve areas.
F. Fill shall be stored on site for the maximum length of time of twenty-four (24)
months. This period may be extended through the written permission of the
Planning Services Director.
II-5
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove POO 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 69 of 142
2.13 REQUIRED ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING
Where the development of land within the Palermo Cove RPUD requires an
environmental permit from a local, State, or Federal agency with jurisdiction over the
property proposed for development, the developer shall obtain such permits prior to final
development order approval.
2.14 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS
Pursuant to Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the
Collier County GMP, and Section 3.05.07 of the Collier County LDC, a minimum of
14.2 acres (25% of the native vegetation on site) is required to be retained or replanted.
Tract "P", contains approximately 38 acres. For the purposes of this RPUD, the Preserve
Tract will fully satisfy the native vegetation requirements of Collier County.
Viable, naturally functioning native vegetation areas do not include those areas of
vegetation that have a seventy-five percent (75%), or greater canopy coverage of exotic
species.
Appendix "A", Typical Cross Sections, sets forth details related to separation of
structures from native vegetation preserve areas.
2.15 RPUD INTERFACE WITH ZONING TO THE NORTH
The Palermo Cove RPUD is bounded on the north by a 9.4 acre property that is intended
to be rezoned to Golden Gate Fire Department (GGFD) Station 73 MPUD, to provide for
a community facility (Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District Station 73), as well
as the final 16 dwelling units in the attached single-family townhouse product line being
developed in the Summit Place In Naples Subdivision. The 9.4 acre parcel lying south
and adjacent to the proposed GGFD Station 73 MPUD will provide project access, as
well as access to the proposed fire station from Wolfe Road. It also provides for a water
management easement to benefit Collier County for the Collier Boulevard six-Ianing
project. This RPUD has been designed to share perimeter land use buffering and to
create contiguous adjoining conservation areas with both the proposed GGFD Station 73
MPUD and the developing Summit Place In Naples Subdivision. Storm water run-off
will be accepted from off-site areas to pass through the Palermo Cove master drainage
system.
2.16 LINKAGE TO COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
Pursuant to Subsection 10.02.13.C of the LDC, upon adoption of the RPUD Ordinance
and attendant RPUD Master Plan, the provisions of the RPUD Document become a part
of the LDC and shall be the standards for development of the RPUD.
II-6
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-] 9-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 70 of 142
SECTION III
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
3.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for areas
designated as Tract "R" on the RPUD Master Plan, Exhibit "A". Infrastructure,
perimeter land use buffers, as well as project signage shall occur within this Tract "R".
3.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS
The maximum number of residential dwelling units allowed within the RPUD shall be
established at the time of development plan review, but shall not exceed 524 dwelling
units.
3.3 USES PERMITTED
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in
whole or in part, for other than the following uses:
A. Principal Uses:
1) Single-family attached dwellings (including townhouses intended for fee
simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence);
2) Villa/patio dwellings (detached single-family dwellings of a smaller scale
than the typical single-family detached dwelling.);
3) Model homes (See Section 2.10 of this RPUD Document);
4) Project sales, construction and administrative offices, which may occur in
residential, andlor in temporary buildings (See Section 2.10 of this RPUD
Document).
B. Accessory Uses:
I) Customary accessory uses and structures including, but not limited to,
private garages, swimming pools with, or without screened enclosures,
and other outdoor recreation facilities.
III-I
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo eove PUD 4-l9-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 71 of 142
3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be
understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between
structures, as applicable. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association
boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards.
B. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: As required by
Sections 4.05.04 and 4.05.07 of the Collier County LDC in effect at the time of
building permit application.
III-2
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo eove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10,2005
Page 72 of 142
TABLE II
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
SINGLE-
FAMILY
A TT ACHED &
TOWNHOUSE
PATIO HOME
& VILLAS
CLUBHOUSE/
RECREATION
BUILDINGS
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
MINIMUM LOT AREA 2,250 S.F. 2,250 S.F. 10,000 S.F.
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 25 FEET 40 FEET N/A
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 S.F. 1,500 S.F. N/A
MINIMUM FRONT YARD 20 FEET 20 FEET N/A
MINIMUM SIDE YARD o FEET or 3 FEET or N/A
6 FEET 9 FEET
MINIMUM REAR YARD 15 FEET 20 FEET N/A
MINIMUM PRESERVE 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET
SETBACK
MINIMUM DlST.
BETWEEN STRUCTURES 12 FEET 12 FEET N/A
MAXIMUM BLDG. HT. 2 STORIES 2 STORIES 2 STORIES
NOT TO EXCEED 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
FRONT S.P.S. S.P.S. 20 FEET
SIDE S.P,S. S.P.S YzBH
REAR (ATTACHED) 5 FEET 5 FEET 10 FEET
(DETACHED) 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET
PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET
MINIMUM DlST.
BETWEEN STRUeTURES 12 FEET 12 FEET greater of 15 feet
or Yz BH
MAXIMUM BLDG. HT. 2 STORIES 2 STORIES 2 STORIES
NOT TO EXCEED 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET
S.P.S.: Same as Principal Structures.
BH: Building Height
III-3
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palenno Cove PUD\Palenno eove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Notes:
I)
6)
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 73 of 142
The location of structures proposed adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the
lake maintenance easement.
2)
No structures are permitted in the required 20-foot lake maintenance easement.
3)
For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back
of the sidewalk located in the street rights-of-way closest to the garage, except for
side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth shall be provided to
avoid vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk.
4)
Side Yards - No side yard shall be required between units when more than one
residential unit is in a single structure (ie: attached single-family and townhomes).
Varying side yards are provided for to allow side entry garages and to maintain the
required separation between buildings.
5)
No structure shall encroach into a required landscape buffer nor any landscape buffer
that is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement.
Patio homes and villas (detached single-family dwellings of a smaller scale than the
typical single-family detached dwelling), shall have minimum side yards of either 3
feet, or 9 feet, with a minimum separation between structures on different lots of 12
feet.
III-4
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palenno Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
SECTION IV
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 74 of 142
RECREATION AREA
4.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development plan for areas. designated. as
Tract "RA," Recreation Area on Exhibit "A", RPUD Master Plan. The pnmary function
and purpose of this Tract is to provide for social and recreational areas/spaces as an
amenity for the residents of the project.
4.2 USES PERMITTED
No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected altered or used, or land used, in
whole or in part, for other than the following, subject to the issuance of regional, state and
federal permits, when required:
A. Principal Uses:
}) Structures intended to provide social and recreational space (private,
intended for use by the residents and their guest only).
2) Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis
and basketball courts, playground improvements/facilities, and passive
and/or active water features.
3) Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
uses and is approved through the process set forth in the LDC in effect at
the time of the request for such use.
B. Accessory Uses:
}) Customary accessory uses or structures incidental to recreation areas and, or
facilities, including structures constructed for purposes of maintenance,
storage or shelter with appropriate screening and landscaping.
4.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be
understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between
structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not
be utilized for determining development standards. Development standards for
Tract RA are contained in Table II of this Document. There shall be a minimum of
a 20 foot separation of recreational building(s) from all residential units.
B. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: As required by
Sections 4.05.04. and 4.05.07. of the Collier County LDC in effect at the time of
building permit application.
IV-}
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palenno Cove PUD\PaIenno Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
SECTION V
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 75 of 142
PRESERVE AREA
5.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development plan for areas designated as
Tract "P", Preserve Area on Exhibit "A", RPUD Master Plan. The primary function and
purpose of this Tract is to preserve and protect vegetation and naturally functioning
habitats, such as wetlands, including upland buffers, in their natural, and/or enhanced state.
Tract P is designated as a preserve, but it is also used as a stonn water flow-way for this
project and surrounding properties. Tract P is used as a flow-way for stonn water, and as
such will also be placed in a drainage easement that will allow for maintenance activities to
be perfonned to ensure that the flow-way always functions properly.
5.2 USES PERMITTED
No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected altered or used, or land used, in
whole or in part, for other than the following, subject to the issuance of regional, state and
federal permits, when required:
A. Principal Uses:
1) Native preserves.
2) Water management structures.
3) Mitigation areas.
4) Hiking trails, boardwalks, shelters, or other such fac.ili~ies construct~d for
the purposes of passage through or enjoyment of the site s natural attnbutes,
subject to approval by pennitting agencies.
V-I
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove POO 4-19-05.doc
SECTION VI
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
Page 76 of 142
DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
6.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the
development of the project.
6.2 GENERAL
All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with site development plans, final
subdivision plats (if required), and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and
regulations applicable to this RPUD. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise,
the standards and specifications of Section III of the proposed Construction Standards
Manual intended to be adopted as part of the County's Administrative Code shall apply to
this project, even if the land within the RPUD is not to be platted. The developer, its
successors and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this
Document.
The developer, its successors or assignees, shall follow the Master Plan and the regulations
of the RPUD, as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in
the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successors or assignee in title to the
developer is bound by the commitments within this Document. These commitments may
be assigned or delegated to a condominium! homeowners' association to be created by the
developer. Upon assignment or delegation, the developer shall be released from
responsibility for the commitments for that portion of the project turned over to such
condomini umlhomeowners' association.
6.3 RPUD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
A. Exhibit "A", RPUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is
conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, parcel, or land use boundaries, or special land
use boundaries shall not be construed to be final, and may be varied at any time at
any subsequent approval phase such as final platting or SDP application. Subject
to the provisions of Subsection lO.02.13.E. of the LDC, amendments may be made
from time to time.
B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to
insure the continued operation and maintenance of all services and all common
areas in the project.
VI-l
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
C. The Community Development and Environmental Services Administratg>p,gS?htt 142
designee, shall be authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the
Palermo Cove RPUD Master Plan upon written request ofthe developer.
1) The following limitations shall apply to such requests:
a. The minor change or refinement shall be consistent with the Collier
County GMP and the Palenno Cove RPUD Document.
b. The minor change or refinement shall not constitute a substantial change
pursuant to Subsection lO.02.B.E. of the Collier County LDC.
c. The minor change or refinement shall be compatible with adjacent land
uses and shall not create detrimental impacts to abutting land uses,
water management facilities, and preserve areas within, or external to
the RPUD boundaries.
2) The following shall be considered minor changes or refinements, subject to
the limitations of Subsection lO.02.B.E. of the LDC:
a. Reconfiguration of preserve areas, in accordance with the LOC, as a
result of regulatory agency review and pennitting. There may be no
overall decrease in Preserve Area.
b. Reconfiguration of lakes or other water management facilities where
such changes are consistent with the criteria of the South Florida Water
Management District and Collier County.
c. Internal realignment of roadways and interconnection to off-site areas,
other than a relocation of access points from publicly maintained
roadways (Le.: State or County roadways), to the RPUD itself, where no
water conservation/preservation areas are affected, or otherwise
provided for.
d. Reconfiguration of residential parcels when th~, is no proposed
encroachment into preserve areas, except as provided for in Paragraph
6.3.C.2.a above.
3) Minor changes and refinements, as described above, shall be reviewed by
appropriate County staff to ensure compliance with all applicable County
Ordinances and regulations prior to the Administrator's consideration for
approval.
4) Approval by the Administrator of a minor change or refinement may occur
independently from, and prior to any application for subdivision (if
required), or SOP approval, however, the Administrator's approval, shall
not constitute an authorization for development or implementation of the
minor change or refinement without first obtaining all applicable County
penn its and approvals.
VI-2
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo eove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4- I 9-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10. 2005
6.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENTIMONITORING REPORT AND S~sitf 142
PROVISION
A. This RPUO is subject to the Sunset Provisions of Subsection 10.02.13.D of the
LDC.
B. An annual RPUD monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Subsection
10.02.13.F. of the LDC.
6.5 TRANSPORTATION
The development of this RPUD shall be subject to and governed by the following
conditions:
A. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be in
accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) Manual of Uniform
Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards, current
edition, and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current
edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as required by the
Collier County LDC.
B. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided at all access points. Access lighting
shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy (CO).
C. Site-related improvements necessary for safe ingress and aggress to this project, as
determined by Collier County Transportation Staff, shall not be eligible for impact
fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public
prior to the issuance of the first CO.
D. Road impact fees shall be paid in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 01-13,
as amended, and Sections 6.02.00, and 10.02.07. of the LDC, as it may be
amended.
E. All work within Collier County rights-of-way or public easements shall require a
right-of-way permit.
F. All proposed median opening locations shall be in accordance with the Collier
County Access Management Policy (Resolution 01-247), as it may be amended,
and the LOC, as it may be amended. Collier County reserves the right to modify or
close any median opening existing at the time of approval of this RPUD which is
found to be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the public. Any such
modifications shall be based on, but are not limited to, safety, operational
circulation, and roadway capacity.
G. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right
in/right out condition at any access point. Neither shall the existence of a point of
ingress, a point of egress, or a median opening, nor the lack thereof, be the basis for
any future cause of action for damages against the County by the developer, its
successor in title, or assignee.
VI-3
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
H. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnf~n~9t8f 142
adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the
developer. Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such
facilities.
1. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County rights-of-
way or easements, compensating rights-of-way, shall be provided without cost to
Collier County as a consequence of such improvement.
J. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County Transportation Staff, a traffic signal, or
other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public
right-of-way or easement is determined to be necessary, the cost of such
improvement shall be borne by the developer and shall be paid to Collier County
before the issuance of the first CO.
K. Adjacent developments have been designed to provide shared access or
interconnections with this development. The RPUD Master Plan indicates these
locations. The developer, or assigns, shall assure that any such shared access or
interconnection is utilized and shall accommodate the perpetual use of such access
by incorporating appropriate language into the development covenants or plat.
L. Wolf Road east/west storm water drainage will be incorporated into the storm
water drainage system of this RPUD.
M. Section G-G on Sheet 5 of 5 of the RPUD Plans Set reflects the street cross-section,
as mandated by the Collier County Transportation Division.
6.6 WATER MANAGEMENT
The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed
by the following conditions:
A. Detailed paving, grading and site drainage plans shall be submitted to Engineering
Review Services for review and approval. No construction permits shall be issued
unless and until Planning Services Staff grants approval of the proposed
construction in accordance with the approved plans.
B. An excavation permit will be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with
the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances and South Florida Water
Management District Rules.
C. The project shall obtain a Surface Water Management Permit from the South
Florida Water Management District prior to any site development plan approval.
VI-4
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
6.7
UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 80 of 142
The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed
by the following conditions:
A. Water distribution and sewage collection and transmission facilities to serve the
project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned, and maintained in
accordance with Co llier County Ordinance No. 04-51, as amended, and other
applicable County rules and regulations.
B. All customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage collection facilities
will be considered to be customers of the County, and will be billed by the County
in accordance with the County's established rates.
6.8 ENVIRONMENTAL
The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed
by the following conditions:
A. Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the State of Florida
Environmental Resource Permit Rules, and be subject to review and approval by
Environmental Services Department. Removal of exotic vegetation alone shall not
be the sole component of mitigation for impacts to Collier County jurisdictional
wetlands.
B. All conservation/preservation areas shall be designated as preserves on all
construction plans and, if the project is platted, shall be recorded on the plat with
protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes.
Preserve areas shall be dedicated on the plat to the project homeowners' association
or like entity for ownership and maintenance responsibilities and to Collier County
with no responsibility for maintenance. In the event the project does not require
platting, all conservation areas shall be recorded as conservation easements
dedicated to the project's homeowners' association or like entity for ownership and
maintenance responsibility and to Collier County with no responsibility for
maintenance.
C. Buffers shall be provided around wetlands, extending at least fifteen (15) feet
landward from the edge of the wetland preserves in all places, and averaging
twenty-five (25) feet from the landward edge of wetlands. Where natural buffers
are not possible, structural buffers shall be provided in accordance with the State of
Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules, and be subject to review and
approval by Environmental Services Department.
D. The PUD shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USF&WS) and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FFWCC) regarding potential impacts to "listed species". Where
protected species are observed on site, a Habitat Management Plan for those
protected species shall be submitted to the Environmental Services Department for
review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval.
VI-5
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo eove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
E. All Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic p&R~Jn~f 142
Council, shall be removed from within preserve areas and subsequent annual
removal of these plants (in perpetuity) shall be the responsibility of the property
owner.
F. A Preserve Area Management Plan shall be provided to Environmental Services
Staff for approval prior to site/construction plan approval identifying methods to
address treatment of invasive exotic species, fire management, and maintenance.
G. The RPUD shall be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management
Element of the Collier County GMP in effect at the time of final development order
approval.. The RPUD shall be consistent with the LDC except as provided for
within this Ordinance.
H. All approved agency (SFWMD, ACOE, FFWCC) permits shall be submitted prior
to final site plan/ construction plan approval.
I. Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of the GMP
shall be set aside as preserve areas.
1. All principal structures shall have a minimum setback of 25 feet from the boundary
of any preserve. Accessory structures and all other site alterations shall have a
minimum IO-foot setback. Where jurisdictional wetlands are a component of a
preserve, a structural buffer would be required to utilize the 10' setback.
6.9 PLANNING
A. The development agreements between Elias Brothers Communities and Wolf
Creek, Limited Partnership, Waterways Joint Venture IV, and the Golden Gate Fire
District, shall be executed and provided to Zoning and Land Development Review
staff prior to the Board of County Commissioners public hearing.
B. No permanent Certificates of Occupancy may be issued until October 1,2007.
6.10 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Accessory structures may be constructed simultaneously with, or following the
construction of the principal structure. A construction operation/management office, and
model center, may be constructed after zoning approval but before construction of any
principal structures.
6.11 SIGNS
Except as provided herein, all signs shall be in accordance with Chapter 5.06.00 of the
LDC in effect at the time of sign permit approvals. The Golden Gate Fire Control and
Rescue District's illuminated off-site directional sign for Station 73 may be incorporated
into the residential ground or wall signage for Palermo Cove. Said signage for Station 73
is limited to the directional signage size prescribed by Sub-section 5.06.06.C.12.b.i., and
would be in addition to the residential ground or wall signage provided for in Sub-section
5.06.04.A.6.b. of the LDC.
VI-6
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Deviation 4 from Section 5.06.03.F. of the LDC where illuminated signage is tft-8~rn,~te8f 142
in residential zones. Deviation 5 from Section 5.06.06.C.I2.a. where off-premise
directional signage is prohibited in residential zones.
6.12 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS
Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal use
throughout the Palermo Cove RPUD, except in preserve areas. All landscaping shall be in
accordance with the Collier County LDC in effect at the time of building permit
application. The following standards shall apply:
A. Landscape berms shall have the following maximum side slopes:
1) Grassed berms 4: 1
2) Ground covered berms 3: 1
B. No toe-of-slope setback shall be required from the common property/tract
boundary of the residential tract (Tract R), and the proposed GGFD Station MPUD,
the Summit Place In Naples Subdivision, and Wolf Creek PUD. Cross-section C-
C, and D-D and F-F on Sheet 5 of 5 of the PUD Plans Set illustrates this common
berming. Deviation 6 from Subsection 4.06.05 .B.II. of the LDC where a five-
foot setback is required from a property line for the toe-of-slope, when the
proposed berm is greater than two feet in height.
C. Pedestrian sidewalks, bike paths, water management facilities and structures may
be allowed in landscape buffer areas, provided that the landscape buffer area is
increased by an equivalent width.
D. Landscape plantings associated with the attached single-family residential
buildings shall comply with Subsection 4.06.05.BA. of the LDC.
E. No structure shall encroach into a required landscape buffer, nor any landscape
buffer that is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement.
6.13 LANDSCAPING FOR OFF-STREET PARKING AREAS
All landscaping for off-street parking areas shall be in accordance with Subsection
4.06.03.B. of the Collier County LDC in effect at the time of building permit application.
6.14 POLLING PLACES
Pursuant to Sections 2.01.04. and 4.07.06. of the LDC, provision shall be made for the
future use of building space within common areas for the purposes of accommodating the
function of an electoral polling place, only if requested by the Supervisor of Elections.
An agreement between the developer and the Supervisor of Elections for the provision of
polling places shall be recorded in the Official Records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of
Collier County. The Agreement shall be binding upon any and all successors in interest
that acquire ownership of such common areas including homeowners' associations.
VI-7
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palenno Cove PUD\Palenno Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
6.15 DEVIATIONS
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 83 of 142
A. All platted project streets shall have a minimum 50-foot right-of-way. Deviation 1
from Sub-section 6.06.01(0) of the LDC, for cul-de-sac and local streets, and LDC
Appendix B, (Section III of the proposed Construction Standards Manual intended
to be adopted as part of the County's Administrative Code), Typical Street Section,
B-4 and B-5 which requires 60 feet to allow 50 feet. (See Appendix "A", Typical
Cross Sections, and Exhibit A, RPUD Master Plan), these streets shall be private,
and shall be classified as local streets. This deviation is found under Section 2.7.A.
of this RPUD Document.
B. Tangents between reverse curves are not required for any local street design in this
RPUD. Deviation 2 from Section III P. 10. of the proposed Construction Standards
Manual intended to be adopted as part of the County's Administrative Code. This
deviation is found under Section 2.7.C. of this RPUD Document.
C. Palermo Cove may have one model home representing each type of residential
product. The number of model homes may exceed five, but shall not exceed a
total of eight. Deviation 3 from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c. that limits the total
number of model homes in a single development to five. This deviation is found
under Section 2.1 O.B. of this RPUD Document.
D. The Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District's illuminated off-site directional
sign for Station 73 may be incorporated into the residential ground or wall signage
for Palermo Cove. Said signage for Station 73 is limited to the directional signage
size prescribed by Sub-section 5.06.06.C.12.b.i., and would be in addition to the
residential ground or wall signage provided for in Sub-section 5.06.04.A.6.b. of the
LDC. Deviation 4 from Section 5.06.03.F. of the LDC where illuminated signage
is prohibited in residential zones. Deviation 5 from Section 5.06.06.C.12.a. where
off-premise directional signage is prohibited in residential zones.
E. No toe-of-slope setback shall be required from the common property/tract
boundary of the residential tract (Tract R), and the proposed GGFD Station MPUD,
the Summit Place In Naples Subdivision, and Wolf Creek PUD. Cross-section C-
C, and 0-0 and F-F on Sheet 5 of 5 of the PUD Plans Set illustrates this common
berming. Deviation 6 from Sub-section 4.06.05.B.I1. of the LDC where a five-
foot setback is required from a property line for the toe-of-slope, when the
proposed berm is greater than two feet in height. This deviation is found under
Section 6.12.B. of this RPUD Document.
VI-8
G:\DeRuntz\AR-6258 Palermo Cove PUD\Palermo Cove PUD 4-19-05.doc
~
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 84 of 142
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
FOR
PALERMO COVE RPUD
(PROJECT NO. 040614)
PREPARED BY:
Metro Transportation Group, Inc.
12651 McGregor Boulevard, Suite 4-403
Fort Myers, Florida 33919-4489
239-278-3090
June 29,2004
es M. Banks, P.E.
Registration No. 43860
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10. 2005
Page 85 of 142
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
IV. TRIP GENERATION
V. TRIP DISTRlBUTION
VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
VII. PROJECTED LEVEL OF SERVICE AND IMPROVEMENTS
VIII. CONCLUSION
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
Page 86 of 142
1. INTRODUCTION
Metro Transportation Group, Inc. (Metro) has conducted a traffic impact statement for
the proposed 131-acre Palermo Cove RPUD. The site is located on the west side of
Collier Boulevard to the north of its intersection with Wolfe Road in Collier County,
Florida. The site location is illustrated on Figure 1.
The proposed Palermo Cove RPUD will allow for the development of approximately 524
single family residential dwelling units. Access to the site will be provided via two full
access locations to Wolfe Road.
This report examines the impact of the development on the surrounding roadways and
intersections. Trip generation and assignments to the various site access drives will be
completed and analysis conducted to determine the impacts of the development on the
surrounding intersections.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The subject site is currently vacant. The site is bordered to the north by proposed
residential development and vacant land. To the west, the site is bordered by the
Islandwalk DR!. On the southern property boundary, the Palermo Cove RPUD is
bordered by Wolfe Road and property zoned for residential development. To the east, the
site is bordered by proposed residential uses and Collier Boulevard.
Collier Boulevard is a two-lane arterial roadway in the vicinity of the subject site.
Collier Boulevard has a posted speed limit of 55 mph and is under the jurisdiction of
Collier County. The 2003 Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR)
indicates the six laning of Collier Boulevard along the frontage of the subject site to
occur in Fiscal Year 2005. This improvement was accounted for in the analysis
performed in this report for the build-out of the site.
Page 1
--'T-
I
:::::.::::1-,
-...-..J
i
-+-
, I May 1 ,2005
: ,'~": .._ ,)I...._...P:ag~~.r.~J42 ....
I 1 j' , l
. .... r... < .-.. -1.;1\- .\~*E.--
! ,. I \,' i -. i ,
, . ii :'1 I I
I I ", ' I, \ l ~ r
.. - .. ......l'.... .-- .. '''-'''r..-:it~~.. ;'~r-' --.:'..... '~:~.~1. . - ...-....,-.
+!I I +!\,,-\' ! .+-
i !r-,." '
~41.19 J 'M.' 11 \ \, .;,...'l 1 II'
"1 . 41 " , ' J
.... ...,.. ,:..-.....,(...-.. -, 'Ii '-I~,lJ. .. ~..J" ..II" -~ ,,_.'____00.. -1-- ' .. m.... '''''-..
',.. \~ i :\ "..,.,~'~{ ","
~~ \ \ \ i' ,_..... " ..:t,;. I
~< II i I
..r....+!'... i
; I i I
'I I '
.... .. ..-r.-~:r:'~':~, :..::,:'-~:-
I
,.,..,!.
i
I
I
.. .,- ,..~ '-f'
I
!
,
i ~. ;.
i
I
I
, ,...... ,..,...-i
I
i
\
i
!
i
."."..1.,....
!
09
r~D)
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
PALERMO COVE
Figure 1
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 88 of 142
--
Immokalee Road is a four-lane arterial roadway to the west of Collier Boulevard and a
two-lane roadway to the east of Collier Boulevard. The above mentioned Collier County
AUIR indicates the six-Ianing of Immokalee Road to the west of Collier Boulevard by
Fiscal Year 2006. This roadway improvement was not accounted for as a l'esult of this
report because it is not within a one-year window from the submittal date. However,
construction is currently underway on the six-Ianing of the existing two-lane segment of
Immokalee Road to the east of Collier Boulevard. This roadway improvement was
accounted for as a part of this analysis.
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed Palermo Cove RPUD will allow for the development of appl'oximately 524
single family dwelling units within Collier County. Table 1 summarizes the land use
utilized for trip generation purposes for the subject development
\
Table 1
Palermo Cove RPUD
Land Uses
tand Use:' SiZe
Single Family 524 dwelling units.
fLUC 2] 0)
Access to the subject site is proposed via two access points to Wolfe Road. Wolfe Road
will be extended from Collier Boulevard. turning to the south, and terminating at
Vanderbilt Beach Road. Collier County plans to signalize the intersection of Collier
Boulevard and Wolfe Road upon the completion of the Collier Boulevard six-Ianing. In
addition, it is also likely that the intersection of the Wolfe Road Extension and Vanderbilt
Beach Road will operate under signalized conditions upon the completion of the
Vanderbilt Beach Road widening. Therefore. Wolfe Road's intersections with Collier
Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road were analyzed as full, signalized intersections.
Page 3
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 89 of 142
IV. TRIP GENERATION
The trip generation for the proposed development was determined by referencing the
Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation, 7'h Edition.
Trip generation calculations were performed for the development based on the proposed
524 single family dwelling units. Land Use Code 210 (Single Family Detached Housing)
was utilized for trip generation purposes. The equations for this land use are contained in
the Appendix of this report for reference. Table 2 outlines the anticipated weekday A.M.
and P.M. peak hour trip generation of the proposed Palermo Cove RPUD. The daily trip
generation is also indicated within Table 2.
.. Weekda 17 A.M. Peak Hour Weekda 1/ P.M. Peak Hour D~ilY "
L,and Use In Out- Total : In ,Out. TotaL , (2~wa)'1
Single Family 95 280 375 300 175 475 4,770
(524 dwelling units)
Table 2
Trip Generation
Palenno Cove RPUD
V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The trips shown in Table 2 were then assigned to the surrounding roadway system based
. ~.
on the anticipated ' 'routes the drivers will utilize to approach the site. The driveway
volumes shown in Table 2 were assigned to the proposed site access drives. The project
distribution utilized for the Palermo Cove RPUD was taken from traffic impact studies
performed by Metro for similar residential developments along the Collier Boulevard
corridor, The project distribution for the proposed development rezoning is indicated in
Figure 2.
In order to determine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly
impacted, Table lA, contained in the Appendix, was created. This table indicates which
roadway links will accommodate greater than the 3%~3%~5% Significance Test.
Therefore, the project traffic was compared with the Level of Service Standard tor Peak
Hour - Peak Direction traffic conditions as defined by the 2003 Collier County Annual
Page 4
LO
~
:t
cd
Cl
f
(REJrlO]
IMMOKALEE ROAD +40%+
WOLF RD.
VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD
+20%+
LO
......
I
PINE RIDGE ROAD
LEGEND
+200/0+ PERCENT DISTRIBUTION
+
60%
+
:'.;";;.:.'.:,::\;'
Agenda Item No. 8D
Page 90~f 142
w*e
S
N,T.S.
+10%+
+
20%
+
+
Q 20%
~ +
iri
-'
5 GOLDEN GATE BLVD.
co
ffi +
3 15%
8 +
PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
PALERMO COVE
Figure 2
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 91 of 142
Update Inventory Report (AUIR). The Level of Service threshold volumes were
obtained from the Collier County ART-PLAN Level of Service Spreadsheets and the
2002 FOOT Level of Service Handbook - Generalized Peak Hour Peak Directional
Volumes for Florida's Areas Transitioning into Urbanized Areas. The FDOT Level of
Service Handbook was reviewed due to the proposed roadway improvements included
within this analysis. A copy of the Level of Service Handbook volumes is included
within the Appendix of this report.
Based on the traffic distribution indicated within Figure 2, the project traffic was
distributed to the projects access point to Wolfe Road. Figure 3 indicates the site traffic
assignment of the Palenno Cove RPUD. This graphic also indicates the site traffic
assignment to the Wolfe Road/Collier Boulevard and Wolfe Road/Vanderbilt Beach
Road intersections.
VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
It was assumed that the proposed Palermo Cove RPUD would be completed by the year
2008. The 2008 background traffic volumes were calculated by increasing the existing
traffic volumes from the 2003 Collier County AUIR by the appropriate annual growth
rate for the roadway link. The annual growth rate for each roadway link was taken from
the Collier County 2003 Average Daily Traffic Rep011. Table 2A in the Appendix of the
report indicates the 2008 peak hour, peak direction background traffic volumes for the
area roadway network. Based on the project distribution shown in Figure 2, the link data
was analyzed for the build-out traffic conditions of the Palermo Cove RPUD both with
and without the development traffic.
Figure 4 indicates the year 2008 peak hour - peak direction traffic volumes and Level of
Service for the various roadway links within the study area based on the traffle
projections for the proposed Palenno Cove RPUD. Noted on Figure 4 is the peak hour-
peak direction volume and Level of Service of each link should no development occur on
the subject site and the peak hour - peak direction volume and Level of Service for the
weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours with the development traffic added to the roadways.
Page 6
-,.'.,._,.,".."."'".;;""....'"."";,,"'i~....iI(~_../W,""'ffl.#,,"_.,,.';"'."W
I I
I I
- I I ~
10 I I
-0
10..- I it) g I ....
M- --
"""0 I ;;;;'" IO-l,.
~ ~ I " 50 (175) 10,
... M I 15 (40) ~+
~ '-t. I... 10 (5) ~ ~I ... 50 (175)
(70) 25 ; WOLF RD. (15) 5.? (105) 170; ~+
o'
(15) 5'" (105) 180'" (30) 40 ~ ......
--
10
e
z
o
~
w
~
~
LL.
-I
~
~
W
-I
::l
o
co
a::::
w
::i
-I
o
C,)
,....,
10 ,....,
MLO
--
:2 ~~ "10 (25)
~ "" ... - (-)
(60) 20 .?
(-) - ..
~
....
8
~
rlTElMO)
VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD
N
W*E
S
N.T.S.
LEGEND
... 000 WEEK DAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
+(000) WEEK DAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
SITE TRAFF1C ASSIGNMENT
PALERMO COVE
Figure 3
~
cO
~
LL
frTElMo]
l()
~
3.291 - "F"
(3,403 - "F")
[3,411 - "Fill
IMMOKALEE ROAD
;::,,>arre :/
, ,'"
...,'..i........,:.;:,_.".... .".
VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD
1,043 - "C"
(1,211-"C")
[1,223 - "C"]
1 ,043 - "C"
(1,099 - "C")
[1,103-"C"]
C
et:
~
..J
~ GOL.DEN GATE BLVD,
et:
w
::i
...J
o
o
l()
~
PINE RIDGE ROAD
...
LEGEND
XXX - "C" 2006 PEAK SEASON PEAK HOUR
PEAK DIRECTION BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
AND LEVEL OF SERVICE DESIGNATION
(XXX _"C") 2008 PEAK SEASON PEAK HOUR
PEAK DIRECTION BACKGROUND
TRAFFIC PLUS AM PROJECT TRAFFIC
AND LEVEL OF SERVICE DESIGNATION
[XXX _"C") 2008 PEAK SEASON PEAK HOUR
PEAK DIRECTION BACKGROUND
TRAFFIC PLUS PM PROJECT TRAFFIC
AND LEVEL OF SERVICE DESIGNATION
2008 BUILDOUT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
PALERMO COVE
N
W*E
S
N,T,S.
Figure 4
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 94 of 142
VII. PROJECTED LEVEL OF SERVICE AND IMPROVEMENTS
Figure 4 details the Level of Service for all links inside the projectts area of influence.
These Levels of Service were derived based on the Level of Service thresholds indicated
within the Collier County ART -PLAN Level of Service Spreadsheets and the 2002
FOOT Level of Service Handbook as previously indicated. Table lA in the Appendix
details the calculations to determine the Level of Service on the analyzed links based on
the build~out traffic conditions of the Palenno Cove RPUD.
As can be seen from Figure 4, nearly all roadway links significantly impacted by the
proposed Palermo Cove RPUD will function under an acceptable Level of Service when
the development traffic is added to the surrounding roadway network. The only
exception is Immokalee Road to the west of Collier Boulevard. However, funding is
available for the six-Ianing of this roadway link in Fiscal Year 2006. A six-lane
Immokalee Road would contain sufficient capacity when the development traffic is added
to the surrounding roadway network. It is likely that when the Site Development Plan
(SDP) application is filed for the Palenno Cove site, the funding for the six-Ianing of
Immokalee Road to the west of Collier Boulevard will be within the required one-year
window in order to account for this improvement. Therefore, no roadway improvements
will be required at this time. All remaining roadway links are shown to operate
acceptably upon the completion of the proposed roadway link improvements.
Turn lane improvements will be required when the development traffic is added to the
surrounding roadway network based on the Collier County Ordinance 93-64. Both Wolfe
Road intersections with Collier Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road will require turn
lanes based on the build-out of several developments that will access Wolfe Road. The
turn lanes on Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard at Wolfe Road will be
constructed as a part ofthe six-taning of these two roadways.
In addition, turn lanes will be required on Wolfe Road at the eastel1unost pl'Oject access
point. These turn lanes are slated to be constructed by Collier County when they extend
Page 9
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10,2005
Page 95 of 142
Wolfe Road to meet the proposed Fire Station that will access Wolfe Road. At the
westernmost site access drive to Wolfe Road, no turn lane improvements will be
required. The western access will align opposite of the north/south Wolfe Road
extension.
VIII. CONCLUSION
The proposed Palermo Cove RPUD at the northwest corner of the intersection of Collier
Boulevard (C.R. 951) and Wolfe Road within Collier County, FloIida will not adversely
impact the existing roadway network. The surrounding roadway network was analyzed
based on the projected 2008 build-out traffic conditions. Based on the analysis contained
within this report, nearly all roadway segments significantly impacted as a result of the
Palermo Cove RPUD will operate at or above the Level of Service Standard for that
roadway as established within the 2003 Collier County AUIR when the development
traffic is added to the roadways. The only exception is Immokalee Road to the west of
Collier Boulevard. This link is slated for six-Ianing within Fiscal Year 2006. A six-lane
Immokalee Road will function acceptably with the addition of the Palermo Cove traffic.
The SDP application for this site will likely be submitted when the Immokalee Road
improvement is within the necessary one-year window to account for it within the TIS.
Therefore, no roadway link improvements will be required at this time.
Turn lane analysis was performed as a result of the proposed development. Based on
several developments within the area, turn lanes will be required at the Wolfe Road
intersections with Collier Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road. The necessary turn
lanes are being constructed as a part of the six-Ianing of these two roadways. In addition,
the required turn lanes on Wolfe Road at the easternmost project access will be
constructed by Collier County as a part of the Wolfe Road extension. The westernmost
access point will not require signalization.
Based on the analysis contained within this report, the proposed Palermo Cove RPUD
will not adversely affect the traffic conditions within the vicinity of the project site. Upon
completion of the roadway improvements funded by Collier County within the next two
Page 1 0
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
Page 96 of 142
years, all roadway links will operate acceptably when the Palermo Cove RPUD
development traffic is added to the surrounding roadway network.
\k:12004\06\ 14\report, doc
..~,{,
Page 11
APPENDIX
.. .;
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 97 of 142
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 98 of 142
TABLES lA & 2A
O..nN
COO~
0....
c:iN-
ZOO
E"'-~
Q) >- Q)
'::: rn OJ
:rn:2ro
'"'0 a...
'c:
Q)
Cl
<(
C
0::
ct
C
Z
~
t/)
Zen
00
_..J
ctl-~
or-OC"')
W W .
..JO::cn
me>
~~~
ctLL
WLL
Q.~
l-
I-
o
W
'"")
o
0::
a..
o l()
co I'-
N ..-
II II
f- I-
:::> :::>
o 0
<t) 0
01 g
II 1I
~ ~
J: J:
0.. 0..
> >
It) lCl
I'- .....
~ ~
II II
c.> U
u: u:
Ll. 1L.
~ Ci
I- l-
t; b
w UJ
..., ...,
o 0
a:: a:
Cl. Q.
a:: 0::
:::> :::>
o 0
J: J:
~ ~
Lti L5
Q. Q.
:iE :a
<( Q.
...l ...I
~ ~
f2 ~
~ 9
Q.
o
It:
~ ~ '# '# '#.
z :;j t-: ~ ~
~
fI)
I i ~ ~
o l()
<0 V
!E t; ()
w W I.L
~ 9
w_il-
Cl. Q.
'# '# ~ ~
8 8 8 8
o c::i d ll'i
<0 N N ..-
fI)~I~~
g z
;5 0
o ~
m N
COO
w
w :&
U) :::l
o ..J
...l ~
8 g 8 15
~ ~ ~ N
Q:i~OO
8 ..J ~ ~
...I g
o 0
o co
~ N
w
U :IE
~ 3
..J ~
o ~
~ C'l
.....
~ ~
..... ....
W
!Xl :Ii
fI) :::l
o ..J
..J ~
o
o 0 0 ;:::
....
ILl
< :IE
fI) 3
g ~
o
o 0 0 01
I'-
I ~
a:
o goo
5 <0 c:zj ~
~
'5 -g
III ffi
~ S
_ III
:e (!)
II) c:
Ifill/;! 1!! 411l -g ~
... v; ~ ~ (!)
'0 15 '0 '0
Z uj u:i u:i
"E
IV
ai
~ "5
~ ~
c(o J1
"0
It: 0
'#. '#
N co
ll'i c;i
o 0
~ C'l
~ '#.
8 8
o d
'Of .....
o 0
~ l8
N C'l
o 0
?;l f5
~ ~
~ g
M <0
N M
f5 8
~ ~
fil fil
<0 N
.... N
~ ~
.... C'l
9 9
'Of <0
S! ~
~ 10
jl j
~ 8
'0 '5
~ ui
-c
III
o
0::
~
iii
.><:
o
E
.5
'#
<0
N
o
<0
~
8
~
o
M
M
N
o
~
N
o
l"l
M
N
o
~
.....
o
o
o
...J
co
.
"0
>
as
jj
"0
U
'0
s:
~
.r;
(,l
III
~
:e
CIl
'0
c
~
~
~ iii
i ~
J: ~
B III
~ ~
" '0
1:
1 :1
.2l III
I- <Il
o III
ft ~
~ J!a
~ ~
S III
~ ~
Co ~
i ~
~
i ! .;;
l1'Oli
& g> &
i ~ ~
~ '~ I
f ~ f&
'E ~ R
~ ;:l
"0 9 1ii
: ~ j
& ~ 8
G> "0 N
~ ~ Gl
~ 'c oS
_E ~ ~
it ~ fii
(II ,6 :S
a>~tn
~ 'f5 ~
(D ... .>c:
,~ 'ill ,~
~ ~ i
oS ~ i
~ ~ E!
E JII '5
:; ~ gj
~ ~ ~
~ u. "E
.r:. ..
~ -g
t= tlJ
j j
'6 '6
~
~
Gl
r=
Qi
a;
-l
OJ
.r:.
I-
O..nN
COO~
~.~:: i i i
_0 I !:3 ~ ....
_~o ~ II. ~
t:: 0 1Ii ~ ....
Q) >-.- ~ II.
:::t1lQ) +
",:2 Cl
"'0 '" i ~ II
c: a...
Q) llCl .... ~ M
Cl Cl ~ I E Q
<( Fl ~
ID +
., i~
f 0 ~
CO
:IE
II.
., ~ llCl
f (D ~
u. ~ '"
I ....
t/) I-
Z IIU
0 * !1.
~ :5 0
<:)
fii Si
::J
(J I ; ~
..J Ill::
< ~ X <'> m
(J lII:: ~
II.
C ~ Q.
Z
< z ;
t/) o a::
<!Z ~ i ! m 6 ~ 0 ~
II)
ci '"
<'II::) Q. W
wO ~ a.
...JU
lXlO 0 cl il ~ ~ !1.
~rL: II) :;)
co ';:: 0
'" z ~ Q
LL ~ a:i
~ U
I-
~ N
Z
::) n II
0 i ~I ~ ~ '"
l- I- I'-
(J ;:l ;:l ~ ~ '"
0 0 - .... ~
IX
W a::
:J 0 >- ~l II'> ~ ,...
II If) W N ....
..J Cl> 0 ;; ~
0 -c '" i ~
Ql .... '"
U E
10
i
<( n II
'IS ~ ~
~ :J: :J:
t. ~ !l> -g
co
ffi ~
II) ." ,~ ,Ill Ii!!
..... .... lit 8
'" ~ lil III III
'5 '5 '0
U) Z ui :s:
II II
~ :;
II.
() U
u: IT:
~ l.L.
~ >-
l- I- ;
l- t>
u ~
LU W ~
a .... 0 ..,
li1 a:: ~
a:: ~
a. 0.. g III
~ ~ ell I
Iii
12 ~ ~
.5
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 101 of 142
2002 FDOT LEVEL OF SERVICE
HANDBOOK - GENERALIZED PEAK
HOUR PEAK DIRECTIONAL
VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S AREAS
TRANSITIONING INTO URBANIZED
" ':.. AREAS
... ~.. - "..
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
Page 102 of 142
TABLE 4 - 8
GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES FOR flORIDA'S
AREAS TRANSITIONING INTO URBANIZED AREAS OR
AREAS OVER 5,000 NOT IN URBANIZED AREAS.
VNINTERRUP'rED FLOW HIGHWAYS
Level of Service
C
620
2,300
3,46G
Lanes Divided
I Undivided
2 Divicled
3 Divided
^
100
980
1.470
B
330
I,SIlO
2,31l0
o
870
2,980
4,470
STA'rE TWO- WAY ARTERIALS
CIIISS I (>0.00 to 1.99 sign1l1ized intcrseellons per mile)
Level of Service
Lnlle~ Divided ^ B C D
I Undivided .. 2to 690 820
2 Divided 240 1.470 1,130 L.810
3 Divided 370 2,260 2,600 2.710
Ctns.~ II (2,00 104.50 slgllaliud inlerllCcliOlls pcr mUe)
LeveL of Service
Lnne~ Divided ^ J.l C D E
I Undi~';dcd u .. 560 760 810
2 Divided .. 200 1,290 1.620 1,7(10
3 Divided .. 320 2,000 2,430 2,560
ClaSlllll (mnre than 4.5 $illnalized inlergectio,lS per mile)
Level of Scrvice
Lanes Divided A 0 C 0
1 Undh:iclcd .. .. 260 620
2 Divided .. .. 620 1,440
3 Di.'iuud ... .. 970 2,220
NON.s-r.....TE ROADWAYS
Major Cily/Counly RoAd....'lIy$
FR~:tl:WAYS
Level of Service
E Lanes A B C 0 E
1,200 2 1,290 2,130 2,890 3.420 3,800
J.390 3 2.000 3,290 4,4~ 5,280 >,870
S,080 4 2.700 4,4S0 6,030 7,140 7,940
5 3.400 S,~O 7,610 9.OiO 1000LO
BICYCLE MODE
E
860
...
...
(Note: Lel/elllf service for 1l1e bicycle mode in IbisllIble is bnsco.l 011 rondway
geomelries at 40 mph pORltd speed alld tl1lffie conditil)fl&, nol number of
bicyclists llsina the facility.) (Mul1iply moloril'oell vel1iclc VOIUII\llS shown
belol'l by number of directional roadway lanes 10 detemline mal\irmun service
volu1DIlli,)
Pftvcd Shouldcrl
Bicycle Lane Level of Servleo
Covernge A 13 C D E
0,49% .. 100 170 no >720
50-84% .. L30 210 >210 U'
85-100% \70 )80 >3&0 ... ...
PEDESTRIAN MODE
t.:
770
1,630
2,1150
(Note: Level of scrvice fur lhe pedCSlriOll mode lnlhis table is blUed on
roadway geometric at 40 lIlph posted speed and traffic conditiOllS, not
numbes of pedelltrions \I$ing lhe fncililY.) (Multiply mOlorized 'cbicle
volumeullOWlI by number of direclion,,1 rondway Innes 10 determine
rllnlllmum scrvlco vnlumes.)
l.evel of Service
Sidewalk Coverage ^ D C D E
0-49% .. .. .. 330 RIO
50-84% .. .. .. S20 990
8S-100% .. 120 WO :>S90 ...
Level of Service
Lanc.~ Divided ^ U C D E t\1~I'l':lUALINON-S"'ATI!: ROADWAY ADJUS'l'MtNl'S
1 Undi.'ided .. .. 370 720 770 DIVIDED/UNDIVIDIlD
2 Di,'idtd .. .. 870 L,SSO 1,630
3 Divided .. .. 1,360 2,nO 2,450 Lnne~ Medinn Len T\lcn Lnlle~ AlljUg!lncnt Faclars
Luvet of Service
ABC D
.. .. 230 49{l
.. ... SilO 1,010
Florida Department of Trnl18porllllioll
S)'SlenlS Planning Office
60s Suwnnnee Street. MS 19
TnllahMRCe. FL 32399-04:50
hlla:l/www II.mvnolida.comlDIRnninRlsVS1el1lslsnlll()ll/lIeClult.l1lln
.Thll '""Ie _.... ...,IiM" ....IlI.rd Ind ,b...1d ~....d only for 11"....1 pl..nil1llap~licscl"". 'rh. C<ln'(l'I'''' madel, 110m whl.I, ,hi, "bloC. dO<i..a.bould be uocd for ...... opaCllic plonnina.ppllC.<i...
The tibia and duivil'1l oOlnp.ttuotlel, '"ouh~ om bo uMd ror corrid",or inlor.action dal~ whA'lC MOle lefined '"hiqUCI 11I1I1. Vllolt\CIlllowu Dl"O ~0I111'f IWC...w.)' vCIIlumot i'Dr lenl. .fIC!MOt wd DRI tor
lhe aulDAlObII.hruGk anodal wnh* $p.lcifk8I1y IIQI"cI, Level ollCl'...ica 11'1101 snd4i'l1twnhohll arc ptob:abty lun 'OMpAr4'bk: .'lOI' mode, and.. t1ttrerore.tro,a.mod&\l.ctnn1"arlloftl nov$cl be m* with eI"don.
furUu:rlftOl'O. ~mbinms.loliOt.~r ,orvtcc o,(dlrfc'rcl\I nlolfes 1011) otIC ...,"rOn I'ODdwa)' It\'a' O(IOn.Ue If 1\Oll'tcommcn~. The IIable".lnpul .....Iut l.I<:I\.II$ Mliltwol olH,vh:c crifCrro appctlf' on t'hc (oUowinS
IlIISO, C.I.....ioo'..'....oe<l.. pll"lIi"s .ppUa.U.". ofalO HIAhwoy CI"';I)/ M.\\O.I. 8k1yclc LOS ~t.dcllllld l'C4tuo1.. LO~ Model. '''lpccti..ly r.'.... '"lOlTlollllohn..~. bklycto Uld ",,~...o1.n ,...d...,
"C..".I'" ocIllc",d..ins ,..Ie i""", ..I... d.lllIlu,
."Nl:ltl'lpplimblo (or the l!:Vel of .crviec lelcol' 1I0d4. For nutotnobiICiII\.lC!tc' moctas. 't'olutnt' .t~Q1It ~""lIlc\o'd ~f$Otylco 0 Mca)"t' F bottlllW hU(:Q1C01ian cttptCttlU hll"'C bOl!I' rNe'hcd. roor bicycle and pedcl.lr111l
'1\O1~" lite level or nmc'C IGIlCT ..~dt (i""hldjnl F) II \\01 :whicytlblc. boc.,,1IC theR: it no lllAll.llnPlN vchit.::lC: 1I01llMC Ihrc.~hokt "14"11 c.able: inpllt wl~ wl\uln.
Diller Signali~cd Raadway~
(~ignali7.cd ill1ersection analysis)
Lane.~ Divided
1 Undivided
2 Divided
Source:
E
630
1.270
02122/02
I
I
Mulli
Mulli
Divided
Undivided
Undi \.jded
Undivided
Yes
No
Yes
No
.5'Yo
-20%
-s%
-25%
ONE-WAY FACILlTJIlS
Increll8e corre$Jlondinll volume 20%.
99
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 103 of 142
COLLIER COUNTY ART-PLAN LEVEL
OF SERVICE SPREADSHEETS
''''''''_~'''''-";''''''''''''__"",<il'''';''''",",_"":""""",:,,",,,,"
d.-V -I..J- '"""l tJ
ART-PLAN 4.0
Arterial Level of Service
Based on Chapter 11 of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual
Florida Department of Transportation
Systems Planning Office. May 2000
Immokalee Road From: 1..75 East Signal To: CR 951
User Notes: Study Period: PM PEAK
K Factor: 0.097 D Factor: 0.600 PHF: 0.980 Adj. Sat. Flow Rate: 1,850
Arterial AADT: 29,067 Posted Speed: 45 mph Section Length: 3.30 mi.
Area Type: Transitioning/Urban Arterial Class: 1 Signal Type: Semiactuated
Peak Direction Maximum Service Volume
A B C 0 E
Level of Service B AADT 1,900 28,500 31,800 31,800 31,800
34.3 PHV 110 1,660 1,850 1,850 ',850
Arterial Speed mph
% No Cycle LIllQth ArrIval Flow vie Control 1m. Link
From To MDT PHV Tums Lln.. Lenath ale Nllt\ . ;;;;~.;: Ratl Ratio Dela" LOS Speed LOS
}.75 East Oakes Blvd 29067 1833 12 2.0 120 0.44 1564 4 1646 1.01 48.0 D 14.1 F
Oakes Blvd OR 951 14502 914 12 2.0 120 0.44 15840 4 820.7 OM ?-O7 C 140,0 B
"
Off-Peak Direction
Level of Service B
Maximum '(lrvi~ volumes are not
Arterial Speed 37.9 mph ~lcUIatsd for the off.pBtllk direction.
% No c~:r Leng1h Arrival Flow vlo Control Int. Speed Link
From To AADT PHV Tuma UinSll Len h gIC - itHti Type Rate ",.110 Oelev LOS LOS
OR 961 OIll<8S BlVd 14502 492 12 2.0 120 0.44 15840 3 441.8 n "7 21.7 C 41.3 B
Oakes BlVd 1.75 East 29067 987 12 2.0 120 0.44 1564 3 I 'H~Q '.l n r::.A 26.0 ~ 20.5 t{
Printed:11/2812001 02:38:44 PM
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 105 of 142
TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 106 of 142
---
TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS
PALERMO COVE
ITE TRIP GENERATION REPORT, 7th EDITION
Land Use Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Daily (2-way)
Single Family
Detached Housing T ;; 0.70 (X) + 9.43 Ln (T) "" 0.90 Ln (X) + 0.53 Ln (T) = 0.92 Ln (X) + 2.7l
(LUe 210)
Too Trips, X = Units
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
or~FT42
it
.'''.-
THIS DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into this
day of , 20_, by and between ELIAS BROTHERS COMMUNITIES
AT PALERMO COVE, INC., a Florida corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Elias")
and WOLF CREEK ESTATES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (hereinafter
referred to as "Wolf Creek").
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, Elias is developing a residential project to be known as .Palermo
Cove"; and
WHEREAS, Wolf Creek is developing a residential project to be called "Wolf
Creek Estates"; and
WHEREAS, Elias and Wolf Creek have determined that it is in their common
best interests to enter into a Developer's Agreement for the purpose of funding and
construction certain infrastructure elements that will serve the needs of both Palermo
Cove and Wolf Creek Estates communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good
and valuable consideration and the mutual covenants and obligations set forth below,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. pUl'Dose. This Agreement shall not be construed to create a joint venture
agreement or any other type of legal partnerShip between the parties hereto with
respect to the development of the Palermo Cove and Wolf Creek Estates communities.
The sole purpose of this Agreement is to provide a mechanism for the parties to share
in a portion of the infrastructure costs for the communities as delineated herein.
2. Access Easement. Wolf Creek will convey to Elias an easement for
vehicular and pedestrian access across the northeast comer of Wolf Creek's land, said
land being identified by Collier County Property Appraiser's Folio No. 00203800007 and
more specifically identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference. The vehicular and pedestrian access referenced herein shall be of sufficient
size and configuration such that a sixty foot (60') wide right-of-way cross-section may be
constructed. The costs of any roadway buffering required by Collier County to be
installed within this easement area will be shared by the parties equally.
3. Wolf Road North-South Extension. The construction of a north-south
roadway to be called "Wolf Road North-South Extension" will be funded and constructed
by Wolf Creek and Elias. Wolf Creek will pay for and construct that portion of this
roadway from Vanderbilt Beach Road, north to the intersection of Wolfe Road
EasUWest being the Wolf Creek RPUD's northerly project entrance, as delineated on
Exhibits "8-1" & "B-2", attached hereto. Construction of the Wolf Road North-South
Extension will include all necessary utilities and stormwater management facilities, as
well as associated pedestrian sidewalks.
DRAFT
November 24, 2004
RE-SUBMITf AL
PUDZ-2004-AR.(i25l1
PROJECT #2004040001
DATE: 1211104
MICHAEL DERUNTZ
Agenda Item No, 80
May 10, 2005
Page 108 of 142
4. Cross-Easement. The Wolt Road North-South Extension shall be
constructed within a sixty foot (60') wide right-of-way. Each party will provide a cross-
easement for ingress/egress and right-of-way purposes to the other party of thirty feet
(30') of right-at-way from their respective parcels. Any Type D roadway buffering
required by the Collier County Land Development Code will be provided outside the
limits of the right-of-way delineated on the attached Exhibits "B-1" & "B_2" and will be
funded and installed solely by the party whereon the landscaping is located.
5. Stormwater Manacement Berm. A common stormwater management
berm will be constructed in that area delineated on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference. The berm will be located equally on both the Elias
and Wolf Creek properties and will have a ten foot (10') wide flat top that will serve as
the location for any required landscape planting such that it meets the requirements for
a Type "8" buffer, as prescribed by the Collier County Land Development Code. The
cost of said berm, landscaping and irrigation shall be borne equally by the parties
hereto. A cross-section of the proposed berm has been attached hereto as Exhibit "0"
and is incorporated herein by reference.
6. Stormwater Manacement SYStem. The stormwater management
component of the Palermo Cove community will be constructed of a sufficient size to
accept treated stormwater from the Wolf Creek Estates community as well as the Wolf
Road North-South Extension, with said stormwater ultimately being conveyed and
discharged into the existing ditch associated with the common boundary of Sections 33
and 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. This stormwater management design will
be implemented through the required permitting with the South Florida Water
Management District and any cost associated with the permitting of the system will be
borne equally by the parties hereto.
7. Utility Facilities. Potable water and sanitary sewer lines shall be installed
as part of the Wolf Road North-South Extension construction. The permitting and
construction costs associated with installation of these utility facilities will be shared on a
pro rata basis between the parties based on the number of units constructed in each
development. It shall be the obligation of Wolf Creek to obtain the permits for these
facilities with Elias' proportional cost payments being disbursed to Wolf Creek on a
schedule as outlined in the attached Exhibit "E" which is in~orporated herein by
reference.
8. Wolf Road East-West Extension. Elias will fund and construct that
portion of a road to be known as the "Wolf Road East-West Extension" lying between
that easterly portion associated with the Pond #4 agreement, to the intended
intersection with the Wolf Road North-South Extension, as more specifically delineated
in Exhibit "F" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The construction of
this portion of the Wolt Road East-West Extension is subject to Elias obtaining all
necessary right-ot-ways to complete the sixty foot (60') wide corridor, including lands
under contract to Wolt Creek. The acquisition of the necessary right-ot-way for this
portion of the Wolf Road East-West Extension shall be at no cost to Elias.
2
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 109 of 142
9. Term. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for a duration
often (10) years from the effective date indicated above unless terminated earlier as
provided herein. This termination date shall not affect the duration of any agreement
referenced herein.
10. Notice. All notices and other items required to be given and delivered
under the terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing, addressed to the parties as
follows:
If to Elias:
Elias Brothers Communities, Inc.
Attn: Roni Elias, President
15100 Collier Boulevard
Naples, Florida 34119
Charles J. Basinait, Esquire
Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A.
P. O. Box 280
Fort Myers, Florida 33902-0398
/f to Wolf Creek:
Wolf Creek Estates, LLC
Attn:
3785 Airport Road North. Suite B-1
Naples, Florida 34105
All notices required to be given under this Agreement shall be given in writing, either: (i)
hand-delivered, (ii) sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or (iii) federal
express or similar ovemight service, or (iv) sent via facsimile. All notices shall be
addressed to the party being noticed and shall be deemed to have been given (i) when
delivered by hand-delivery; (ii) three (3) business days after depositing in a U.S. Post
Office or official letter box, if sent by certified mail. (iii) one (1) business day after timely
deposit in a federal express or similar overnight service depository, or (iv) upon
confirmation of receipt by sender if sent via facsimile.
11. Amendment. Any amendments to this Agreement shall not bind any of
the parties hereto unless such amendment is in writing and executed by all the parties,
subject to the approval process. Any amendment to this Agreement shall be binding
upon the parties as soon as it has been executed by all of the parties.
12. Entire Aareement. This Agreement, together with any exhibits attached
hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no prior written
documents, and no prior or contemporary oral statements, representations, promises, or
understandings not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force and/or effect.
13. Litiaation. In the event any party commences litigation to enforce such
party's rights hereunder, the non-prevailing party in such litigation shall bear the
3
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 110 of 142
reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred by the prevailing party in such litigation,
including those incurred on appeal, if any be taken.
14. Headinas. Captions and paragraph headings contained in this
Agreement are for convenience and reference only; in no way do they define, describe,
extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any provision hereof.
15. Gender. All terms and words used in this Agreement, regardless of the
number and gender in which used, shall be deemed to include any other gender or
number as the context or the use thereof may require.
16. Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective
unless it is in writing signed by the party against whom it is asserted, and any waiver of
any provision of this Agreement shall be applicable only to the specific instance to which
it is related and shall not be deemed to be a continuing or future waiver as to such
provision or a waiver as to any other provision.
17. CounterDarts and Fax CODies. This Agreement may be executed in
several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which
shall constitute one in the same agreement; provided however, that each of the
counterparts shall have been executed by both the parties hereto. Facsimiles copies
shall be acceptable.
18. Survival. AU covenants, agreements, statements, representations,
indemnifications and warranties made by each of the parties in this Agreement
(including any annexed instruments ,and documents), or in any document or instrument
delivered by each of the parties pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, shall
survive the termination of the Term of this Agreement, and the delivery of all
consideration and documents pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, and shall not be
deemed merged or extinguished by any other action, agreement, instrument or
docu ment.
19. Enforcement and Governina Law. This Agreement shall be govemed
by, construed and enforcedYIJP~r. t!1e laws of the State of Florida.
4
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 111 of 142
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
properly executed as of the day and year first above written.
WITNESS:
Witness Signature
Printedrryped Witness Name
Witness Signature
PrintedfTyped Witness Name
Witness Signature
Printedrryped Witness Name
Witness Signature
PrintedfTyped Witness Name
El.IAS BROTHERS COMMUNITIES
AT PALERMO COVE, INC., a Florida
corporation
By:
RONI ELIAS. President
WOLF CREEK ESTATES, LLC, a Florida
limited liability company
By: Hoover Planning & Development,
Inc., a Florida corporation
By:
WILLIAM HOOVER, President
5
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10. 2005
Page 112 of 142
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2004, by RONI ELIAS, as President of ELIAS BROTHERS
COMMUNITIES AT PALERMO COVE, INC., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the
corporation and who is personally known to me or who has produced
as identification.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
PrintlType Name of Notary
Commission No.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2004, by WILLIAM HOOVER, as President of Hoover Planning &
Development, Inc., the Manager of WOLF CREEK ESTATES, LLC, a Florida limited
liability company, on behalf of said corporation and said company and who is personally
known to me or who has produced
as identification.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
PrintlType Name of Notary
Commission No.
NOTE: The timing of construction of roads, stormwater management berm and utilities
has not been delineated in this Agreement, nor has the timing of the cross-easement
conveyance been set. Specific time frames should be established before the document
is finalized.
#1264717v1
6
O..nN
COO~
0...-
ON.....
ZOO
E"'-~
Q) >-.....
:::"'Q)
rn~OJ
"'0 rn
c: a...
Q)
OJ
<(
~
,~
..
k
'"
~
~
~
~
....
'"
!ti~"
;~
1:0 ~~~
l!IeiS
E;,: ~..,.~
~ -"'~
~ ::;~~
~ i~il
~ ~r~
~1oI"'l!l
~ l:!;~..
I ~~~
-~~
~ ~~~
e::: ~!~
~ ~:!;"~
~ ~~~
~ ~1;;~
~~~ct
:li1~l!s~~~~iI;loI~ iI;~
~ ~I' ~ ~1S:l:!;~ 1S:l!s1
~~~ ~t-;'"'~~~""~~~
I>j~""" E.~~~~~~~l;;
~ ~ i ~ a: ~ l;; ~ :r;" a: :Ii s::( r I!I
~c:~t~~~lI!~~~a:~~i
~~~~~a:S~1;j~1;j~1;;~=
lie~~i~~~~~~~~
~ei!oii;; il;a:~i:'liri:'i~i:'l~E!
\oi-~C:: 1S:1lia:~-~~l!s~i;;
lee........... . -= ~~~ :o......t:t
~t;;~ili~~~~::- ~~~~
i ~ : ~ ~ g ~.: i = i ~ i ~ ~ ei
::;~~~Ia~~~!~~~!~~
~:t;;~!i~~~~t;;~~~:;;~~
~o:::lIh~l:!sl:!~l!s~~E!~~""
....~~~l!s~!$I~~~~....~1.,Ili~
~ .. " ~ .... _' ~ ~ ~,.. c;: '"
""!;:;~El"'<> ....ii'i....c::....~:lil
li"'~~~~~~~~~~~~
a:i!5~~~~I!;a:I!;&lI!;a:i!5...
~1;j~~lS~~~~~~~lii~
-z-
~ ~
~i ~
Ii i ~
~ei ~ !
~e :g I
~..,. ~
::~ ;;
~~ !:! ~
~I i ~
![ ~ iI;
~~ :: !
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~: I
I~" ~ ~
~ii~; ~m i
S~lii~ ltls i
~"" ..."'S
~
'"
ctl
.....
~!
~~
ej;::l
""~
~~
I~
..~
~~
<S~
~
I
, ~~~~ ~~
!'lI $l-\:j ts'
1 s ~ ~I
, C> ~ s !:~
-~~
I ; I Ji!
I : I ~~I!l
---- -l~--
-_L-_-~l"-"-"-'
-----1-----------1--1 !
. I . ,
;i \ \ \
t! I I 5t~
! I ! ~S
"\ !-l t~
I~I:: i ~ W
j ; I
~ l :
I ' ,
:;...j I
: i: l
I I :
I : I
: I ;
, I
: i i
I , ,
, ' I
'1100\ '
:~: :
:b~1 :
lllll:l:: ,
~; ~l :
, ,
, ,
I r
, I
I I
: I~ I
: :Jll.'
... : ~;; ~
. I .:"'lil
~5 :~I..:
~ Ii :~: :
.. :
I
------ l:!1l:! -----mM.ooi-.,_,_
"., T' - ,.-,.-" - ..~.._.. - kif '~;}'ow..iiJx)8am., _
'- - - - - - ---:r- - - - - - - itii;::A-i;ew ~ --
I :'
, , .
, :'
, ~~ ,,~
.. : I.
i~ :I~
~~ !:Iil
H :I~
ts~ !il
:1 ~~ Ii:
~:r 1= Ii;
h ~,
WL
,:
II
II:
lr~
ts~
~~
::;"
i~
Ii
~~
I
,
I
I
....+..-..-..-..-.
I i I Ill-
I ,,~ jli,g;
-. :llt~
j ~j -HP
~~ I:
I ~~ I::
I :r~
I e~
l:::.! ' i ..
I ~t 51: 'I if"
I ~ ~ : ~ n! I ~i~'
I ~I i ~51 ~ .
I ~;:j ,I
",. ~~:=-==?-J~::" -=-::3 .._~'~ =
! h I~ ~ h ~tsltlt
I U ! ,~..i~ .~~~i
... , I u Sl4!.."
, tslt'" "'"
I ~~I
: ~~~
II
'I
ill:
I~
s.~
E~
!I
~s
~..
~.
f-
"r:
:~
i~
~~
:r~
tst;;
si
at
h
Ie
::.....
~
P::
"II: ::5
:H/~
i~
~~~
~" E-..
~:~
s.i
d.
~!:
h
'C
I
~ ~
r.j C\/
! ~ ~ rk
-~ S~ r__ S;;!
~~ ~ ~
~l!s ~'"l;
~ II:! "... r-_ ~ r::l ~
Vi ~ ~,,J........ ll:: o::i
~::;; C);t:S
~ ~sc.:;
:c:; ~ s::l~'
~~ti)
~~Q:l
~~'"e
~~~
~-~ila
~~~S ~
~ ~e ~
~ ~" ~
r.:::j ~ ~
~ ~
.... ~
~ te
~
..,
...
I ~
~ \,);0
"'. <::I_
-- I II)
l'-
~' Q;; (t !S
s;;::. t:!; =!t:
;:s~ :; ~!lS
~/.i:! <'l ~~
~!::?:.. "~
~!!i~~ ~~
C'.i I!'i r.;!i!
~ ~ ~~ ~
-q;~l::i ....~
9:: ~tIS::!;~
~ · ~~ IS
~.~ !i2 ~~
::i!~~ei Cor..
~~~ "'Q
~~ ~ ge:;
~L".:j ~ ..~
~ ~ l6 ~~
c::).t; . Q ~
. !f:~
.
.. ~ I
~ :0: Q
... l!l ~
I ~ e ~ .
~ ~ ~....
rI)
i ~ ~I"" I
: ij m ~~ ~
~~ \!sls\!sll:! i
'" ~.........!.~ i~
~ '~~~~~~e1;;
~~ ~ctj'-S'"
~::l 'l ~~~~ltt~
..
'''Ool_1I3SV1 HO:l1ll 'I'W l"tt'tll ;QOtfltllO ',.-, 'Lon-s'Lt-al"'PlSn:lV 0' DAOOH1'IIll\IlO'!0Id,s0H-0\'El
...
~s
s~
..
b I
,~i ~~
:;:;~
ii' i !
~~ i ;
!""' ~ ~
...~ 111
\Il~ i
~~ ~ ~
S! Ilr: I ~
~~ S! ~
i~b ~ a
I i~ ~ I
~i;illl
e.;;; =l;j~ ~~
~
~..: .. "i
...
I
~. ~
foij t\j
a!;t:.~ ~
~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~~~~
~ ~ ~~
~~~:s
~ C~e
e.;;; ~ fa ~
~~;;~ ...
~ ~8 ~
~ .... ;:...,'
~ t') ~
~ ~
~ ~
. ~ ~
~
O..nN
COO~
,- 0..-
'N_
_0
o
E"-~
Q) >-...-
=="'Q)
",:2 Cl
"'0 '"
c: a...
Q)
OJ
<1::
I~b ~ m~b~b12
.;~;~~~~~~~~~
::r;i:-~~iO;b~~~:-a;~
~;(~!:)~~~8lt'"''''~Sl~
SiI~=~~~Sj~~i~~lS
~~~~I!i!~~~~I~
~8b::~~'~12~;:;~~'"'~
lI;~~~~' ~~lt~~~~-
~ei""::r""!:"" iSiO;.l"'l::r;~
I.l.....~,.; ~~~~ ~~ ~ ii'i itl<:l
I!:~ ltl....rt....Sl!;j blll!!!
~~~bi~ib~~~Il;j~
!!~~~~~~~i~~~I~
.... .....lS~ ~lS.... ~ ~
ji!t~'"'b~~,",'"'~,",~$
~~~s~s~i~S!ij....
~~ii:(iS:(iS:(~f;;~~~~
5~ a;~.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~a A ~~
i~ ~~a~ l;j ~l;j ~~; f;; ~~
III
~
~t;;~
~ i:5;;j
"" III te
~ ~!~
ihl
~ ~~,
~ ~l~
iO;~~
I ~::r;'~
:c:; ~ e
~ el)!l
~....b
~ ~~I
~ ~:::~
~ ~~~
~ ~~~
s:i
'"
~
~!
~~
~~
I~
...II:!
~i
alli
-z-
I
. --------
------ lq jiq - ---- rn 1YM'.:I..f.1l?!-.._,._.
0" T" -.. -.,-.,-' '~"-,. - ili6 '~-;iow~1f}f!EJ.. __'
1_ - - - - - ---;j- - - - - - - iii~.'A-J_.lal
I I
!.'ll:
i% !%
u 1~
ir$ IS
~~ ,i
~i il.. I'
~:r Ii II
h !"
L..lL-
,:
II
....1 ~...
..... "'\1)
"'. Q...
-... Jill
~~ a;; ~ !S
e.;;::.. ~ """I:i
~~ ; ~!l:i
'-3 ~"!: CO)~;:lII
~ :::>
~ tro.. .,:t;
e,s~~~ ~:t;
""I:l&:j ll; ~~
~~~: ~~
~ · ~fe i' ~
~~ ila ~'"'
Siag~ Clor.,
~l5lftj ""c
~ ~ ~!~
~rt;j ~ .,~
l:.:i~ ell ~~
I::IiotJ eel
~u
, ~~ ~ ~
" i!;
I'll, ~ ~i
~...
"",IS
\ ~ I
I ~ I
---__-L
;r:rr
__L-
~
~ I( .
~'i
I:~
t:;~t'
r:~
llld~
~IIS
\'
,~
k.
-,
.~
"
~
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
....~.._.._.._.
1
I
,
Ie
~~
\!sO:;
~~
~~
llJ:;;
H
f~
..
rrl
I
I
.
,
I
I
,
I
I
I ~"
\n
w ~
: ::....
.! ~
l:I' 9::
.! 'It,1e::::;
: :::~ CI';) .., ~
I i; ~
! ~~ ~ ~
I :r'lt,.E-.., ... ~
~!! ~: ~ i ~
t:b, \ si Cl
lilR! ;;1 ~
1t:1Ii, h
\h
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
I
\
,
I
-----1-----------
il., III
Ii
u
s.~
is.
d
~~
Illi;t-
11!~1
: I,~",
+lP
III
I!
~~
:,
i~
f~
I~
b~
i! .~ III:~
~~ h Ii ,I.ij;
I Ii i ~~ d
... ~I .ol_______r' ____'~I.-==..::=..~ =
~ . i...:'"'
:.. il'" ~I-"
I ~I ~i ~ ~=:; ~~~:
I i::\ i~ :11.-" ila ~
I I~~~~ ~~
. '~~~l
I I ~I....
, il <ld
I '
I ~ I
I
~-
I.
~~
...,
~ll:
:::,
101;
~~
~~
bl;;
si
~:
h
i .
(!l ~
e 'I"
~ ~ ~
~s 1M ~
(&1 bbl!s
Ili ~.......o.!.~ ~~
..-, ~ ~~~S~~l;j
~Cl:\U'"
-<:l<:l<:lct: ""U
....::l ..: a.: OI:! <:lltul)!
...
~~
...
" I -a" nq, XX
9 'J:lol_UV1lllSY"lIlCOlll'l'ldIK''':ZOMlClUl(lID'~~m~KllWlOH '1'1I~.ot.aI'D
O..nN
COO~
0...-
ON_
Z .0
o
E'-~
Q) >-.-
':::"'Q)
"'~ OJ
"'0 '"
c: a...
III
Cl
<(
"
"
~
-~
h.
.....
~
......
~
X
~
t;;
rt;:.
~~
~~
l.C':l ~elii
.... t..:.
~ ~~~
~ S! ~~
~ ~"';
tIj l!s ~~
~ s.S!~
I ~~~
~ ~i~
&::: ~ ~~
~E!~!i
~ ~l;;~
~ ~l!s~
~ ~~~
-z_
~ ........
i~i~~ ~iiS~~~~1
~~!ilitlw~~~~I!s~l;;
~il!iS'" ~~;"":S
;:r;.iS~il;;~~~ :::~l)f~~
~~t;;~~t~l!s!i...~~~
Bl~~~~:::;~'"'~~~~~
l!sil!s~~~l!s~~~~:-~li?
~,~~t;;~bi:l~l!slw~t;;~
....oio!.... !ljiS~bll"> E:S~
~~t::~j!;.lS~~~li?~Iw:
~e;::S ~gj'" ii!:......... Ell!:
~~~~~i~~S!~~~~l!s
~e~.....~::~~~S!~~~~~
~~~!!~~S!~~I!s:-~~l!5
le~li?~~!)j~~~~i~"'~
t;; ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : s.~ ~ ~ ~ li
:"0: d .iS~!wil!iS...lwiS':';~
~le~Sl~~~~l;;s!~:~~~
~i~~~~~~~~~S~l;;1
~i!t,",~....~i~l!s ~iS~~~
lilS!~lS~~~~~!l;;~~l!s~
l!s ~
~i ~
Ii i ~
~~ I ~
!t;:i ~ i
..... i:S ...
19le ~ ~
~! .1 ~
~~ : !
~~~ ~ ~
~ i~ ~ I
..I~" 1m ~
~ I~! ~l!s i
C
~""'
---------
------ ~j~ ---~,~.E~,~~~~.,-..-,
-.' T" -" -,. -.. -. ~.. -.. - '(," '/I':J) DlNAJJtJB 8W
: -- - ~ - ----rr- - --- - - 'iiiA;:;;:t_lsiI- -'
I :'
i Ii
~II: :It
~, I-
i~ :=,;
~~ Iii:
..~ I$.
;~ l:!!i
~i lr
i~ &I" I'
:; II ,i
~L
,
II
,
-.....:-..-..-..-
I
I
I
I
II:
It
l!s~
S.~
~~
h
Ii
~~
II~~
lllii
'l,i~
+lP
:11
'I'
, ,
, ,
, I
,
Ii
SIi:
i1i<t
,::
!i
~s.
!I
~-
~.
Q'"
....
l!!
'"
ctl
....
~I
~~
i~
~I
I~
),.,~
~~
Qitl
'"
'"l
-~
~lt'
~~
~i:l!
~~
Il:l
I
E-,' on
c" le
~ l\I
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~~ ~
E=::l<::)~~
~ ~ ~ ~.
~ ~~~
~gs~8
~ ~~~
~'oq:~~~
~ ~8 ~
~ ...,.- ).;'
i=:;' .., I:l:
...... ~ ~
c =e;
t: ~
~
, ~~;!
III ~ ~~
1 ~~
, abllS
I I I
I ! I
---__--L-
__1-- tr'tr
itr
-----1-----------1--
. ,
ij \
,
I
,
---<
I
I
Ii \
I II
! s
I
I
I
,
,
I
I
,
I!",
, '
, ~
\~~
:~t1
,...
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
'" I
~e !
E Sl :
... :
,
~lI:
~,j,
il
~~
IS.
b$
SI
i!;~
~:
h
~
~
I~ ~ ~ !~
l!s'<l ~,~ ~~
;~S e..;;;. ~ ~t:t:
h~ ~ ~ .. ~!l5
..~~. ~~ ~ ~~
i:~ ~~~ ,.~
Qjd~ ;.e ~ ~i ~~
atoll< t1 ~ r.;~
~u ~~~~ ~
"""=:S ....11:
!Ii ....Q
~ . ~~ :;: ~
~ ~ g~ ~ "l
;: ~ ~ fIl ~~
~ ~ t; gt!
~r.;j ~ "~
'=i ~ ~ !QE;
~ti ~f;:
;;:B
..
,II:
-I
..~
i~
u
IS.
l!s:O
~i &I: !IIII~
lr is II ~l!s~
I ~.. h ~~ : ,I ~I~
I li- Yf.:-Sl ~
. " I
i '" II
~L------t----t -=-.:= ,:;, 'Q .=
I , i~.~
:.. 5:..' i I ~..
I "'.. ~ 'h ~le
: ~S ~S -, ..=Ei i~~r
, i~ ~;:s ;~:~; ili~~
I~"~~'
'Slt~",
II "'0
~
\l ~
! ,~ ~
:~ ~ ~
i~ -q: ~ ~ I b
~~ ~ ~
ir' ~ i ~ ~ 'I
~ b: ~ ;S ~ ,Q
.. ~..... fIl Q ~ hl'"
~ Si
II d"
It: ~r
II!.
Ii 1M.
G ~i ~
;:s l!sl!s, ~ ~iI:;
~............. i:!l i!::
.._, ~ ~~~ ~~tij
s.;;~ ctl<..lllt
t::lCit::lQi 0.:<..1
Cl.:Cl.:o.:t::la:<..Il>l
"Z-S:" J!qJqx
'"Dol HD09UV 1IlISV1 Ho:llV 'K.l91IC':zD *VIVlO ',-., 'I"l'l-SStNl\~ os 1IllMlOII nlll\-rOldlsoll\C\1O
--- .".....---.......-----
-~I"*"cl "'-'leI 'TWS~-=-
uoclclow'l' """-'s ......q ..a
."'"
O..nN
COO~
c_ 0...-
'N_
.0
o
E"'-
w>-
-'"
~:2
"'0
c:
Q)
Ol
<(
....
...
.'.)
,
~
---
~
~NIH3,:I.:mfI Q3HvHS
-
rl'-il'
...""
l.J ,~
'nw
andH 31\ OJ OM:I31'Vd
.+
. .
I
I
@z
~:s
~~
>~
O~
U~
O~
~@
~~
~
II -II
~2
to
I
~::=:: =
~I n
~~
-
':)NJ '3AO:) OMJ31'1d.LV
S31.LINflWWOj Sli3H.L01/fI SVJ7~
.....>>'
- .... ,..
..,....,l 011'
1,1
Ii; I
I. ~~
-,
,I I
I. 1
"II i
I
I.
"I
,I
.~
.........,., ........
~
~
I
It
.
It
/- -~tJ~
(__ -:I
I!
1;1
IJ~
I[---_U
o
~I
i (l~l ~
".C'fl~.~
=. ......... .,...
qll
":::>" ~!<LII[X:ll
" ,
--
...."..t.lIrO;:
..-
DoM?::'-C'O
"""''''''
....
I
I
.
1_,__-
CEH'ItlIUNE
OF .....
..... aF
.... LJH<
...-
KT\IOCIl
5' COIICIlEIt
-..
Nov 01, 2004 - J 1:32:54
Exhibit "D"
20' .._ (!'OTIC) 1t01lDI"'1.lAS)
15'A~=-=::--Y
J' w..uM
-.(30'-10')
-.
RtSlDDnW. 1Ul.DN:
........
-
snIUCIIlIlE
-
101' Of ...
.. _ sr...:
....uw '-tm F'l.DCIIt a...tVAnOH
DISlM
-
!IFC'IlON F-F
f4,__
LDC !EC'IIJN 4MJIIS..C.l 1.
XJE"I"=' .~
0:\2003\03-0126.01 ARM - Polemto Cove RPVD Rezoning\DDD3 Rezoning\RPUD .t Wote, Management Plon.\Sullmitla'\Rovi.ion "\JOI26X03,d..g
IlATE,
NOV" 2004
nw T A~C En~een,
~NSUL TING Surveyors & Mappers,
..&..... y Y..J.. ... Plannen, Project Managers
3050 Not1II Horseshoe Drive, Sulle 210
Naples, Ronda 34104
Phone: (239) 649-1509
FAX: (239) 64&-7Oli6
SCAl.E:
N.T.S,
CLIENT: ELIAS
AT PALERMO
PALERMO COVE RPUD
CROSS SECTION F-F
BROTHERS COMMUNITIES
COVE, INC.
DRAWN IIV,
P.W.S.
CHECKED BY:
D,H.N,
SEC: TWP: ~ct, PROJECT03 01 26 0 SHEET 3 3
34- 4-BS 26E NUMBER, - . NUMBER: OF
TITLE:
~IC~8ER: 30126XO
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 118 of 142
EXHIBIT "En
TO BE INCLUDED AT LATER DATE
.......................-.0___..._
-~~-muutfd YJiIA S~J
mclaoK'i' ~ ..U
:>HI
OLC?N
COO~
o
ON
Zc:i
E"'-
w>-
-'"
-;;;:2
"'0
c
Q)
Ol
<(
aYOH 3.:110Jl'. AV3
OfldH EAO:J OM/37'11c/
"""
H'
--
.1<.01\'
..-
, ~
-~.
.&O>.t:lft:t"'lC'
.""
.-
-:JNI '3AO:> OWH31\1d .L Y
S3JJJNnWWO:J S1l3H.LO!lf{ SV17i.,."
I(JC~
..."
-- ...
--,
~A\M'.Ihw
.+-
. .
I
I
---
@~
~~
~ ~~
\t >~
O~ ...tt1...........c ....,
w U~
..
\.... O~
.....
\Q ~@ !'
I ~ i
..... II II I .
~ 2
~ ~~ ~2
~
,
I. ~
"'
II &
I. l
-I, i
I
I.
-'I
I
.~
:~:=:: =
----EJ
rc_,-;
~I n
~ j~
21 EI
-'"
,.;--- LJ
:C---:__J
~
I
o ~
(r::Ii
W
"I.~~~
=.INWW __
~
811
".I" :nq!1lx~
~ 1 .
.
I
I
~.
Agenda Item No, 8D
May 10, 2005
DR~FTof142
..
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
""
.
~,J
.:""4:.,
THIS DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into this
day of I 20_, by and between ELIAS BROTHERS COMMUNITIES
AT PALERMO COVE, INC., a Florida corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Elias")
and WATERWAYS JOINT VENTURE IV, a a Florida general partnership, developer
of Summit Place in Naples, (hereinafter referred to as "Waterways").
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, Elias is developing a residential project to be known as "Palermo
Cove"; and
WHEREAS, Waterways and Palermo Cove have common property boundaries
as delineated in Exhibit "An attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, Elias and Waterways have determined that it is in their common
best interests to enter into a Developer's Agreement for the purpose of funding and
construction of a stormwater management berm along their common boundary line.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good
and valuable consideration and the mutual covenants and obligations set forth below,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. PurDose. The sole purpose of this Agreement is to provide a mechanism
for the parties to construct a stormwater management berm along their common
boundary line.
2. Stonnwater Manaaement Berm. A common stormwater management
berm will be constructed in that area delineated on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference. The berm will be located equally on both the Elias
and WaterwaYs properties and will have a ten-foot wide flat top that will serve as the
location for any required landscape plantings, such that it meets the requirements of a
"Type B" Buffer, as prescribed by the Collier County Land Development Code. The cost
,of the berm construction I landscaping and irrigation shall be individually' borne by the
parties hereto. A cross-section of the proposed berm has been attached hereto as
Exhibit "B" and is incorporated herein by reference.
3. R8sDOnslbllltv For Construction. Elias shall have the responsibility to
construct the berm and install the landscaping and irrigation referenced herein within
their project boundary. Likewise, shall have the responsibility to construct the berm and
install the landscaping and irrigation referenced herein within their project boundary.
4. Tenn. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for a duration
of ten (10) years from the effective date indicated above unless terminated earlier as
provided herein. This termination date shall not affect the duration of any agreement
referenced herein. '
~--- . - - ----
--------~ -------~--
DRAFT
November 24, 2004
RE.SVBMmAL
PUDZ-2004-AR-6258
PROJECT N2l104Oo4eooJ
DATE: 1211104
MICHAEL DERUNTZ
-
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10,2005
Page 121 of 142
;,
5. Notice. All notices and other items required to be given and delivered
under the terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing, addressed to the parties as
follows:
If to Elias:
Elias Brothers Communities, Inc.
Attn: Roni Elias, President
15100 Collier Boulevard
Naples, Florida 34119
If to Waterways:
Waterways Joint Venture IV
Attn: Richard Davenport, President
15122 Summit Place Circle
Naples, Florida 34119
All notices required to be given under this Agreement shall be given in writing, either: (i)
hand-delivered, (ii) sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or (iii) federal
express or similar overnight service, or (iv) sent via facsimile. All notices shall be
addressed to the party being noticed and shall be deemed to have been given (i) when
delivered by hand-c:lelivery; (ii) three (3) business days after depositing in a U.S. Post
Office or official letter box, if sent by certified mail, (iii) one (1) business day after timely
deposited in a federal express or similar overnight service depository, or (iv) upon
confirmation of receipt by sender if sent via facsimile.
6. Amendment. Any amendments to this Agreement shall not bind any of
the parties hereto unless such amendment is in writing and executed by all the parties,
subject to the approval process. Any amendment to this agreement shall be binding
upon the parties as soon as it has been executed by all of the parties.
7. Entire Aareement. This Agreement, together with any exhibits attached
hereto. constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no prior written
documents, and no prior or contemporary oral statements, representations, promises, or
understandings not embodied in this Agreement shall be of ~ny force and/or effect.
8. Lltiaation. In the event any party commences litigation to enforce such
party's rights hereunder, the non-prevailing party in such litigation shall bear the
reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred by the prevailing party in such litigation,
including those incurred on appeal, if any be taken.
9. Headinas. Captions and paragraph headings contained in this
Agreement are for convenience and reference only; in no way do they define,
described, extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any provision hereof.
10. Gender. All terms and words used in this Agreement, regardless of the
number and gender in which used, shall be deemed to include any other gender or
number as the context or the use thereof may require.
2
;,
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 122 of 142
11. Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective
unless it is in writing signed by the party against whom it is asserted, and any waiver of
any provision of this Agreement shall be applicable only to the specific instance to which
it is related and shall not be deemed to be a continuing or future waiver as to such
provision or a waiver as to any other provision.
12. Counteroarts and Fax CODles. This Agreement may be executed in
several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which
shall constitute one in the same agreement; provided however, that each of the
counterparts shall have been executed by both the parties hereto. Facsimiles copies
shall be acceptable.
13. Survival. All covenants, agreements, statements, representations,
indemnifications and warranties made by each of the parties in this Agreement
(including any annexed instruments and documents), or in any document or instrument
delivered by each of the parties pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, shall
survive the termination of the Term of this Agreement, and the delivery of all
consideration and documents pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, and shall not be
deemed merged or extinguished by any other action, agreement, instrument or
document.
14. Enforcement and Govemina Law. This Agreement shall be governed
by, construed and enforced under the laws of the State of Florida. The parties hereby
submit to the juriSdiction of, and waive any venue restrictions against, the U.S.
Waterways Court for Florida and the Circuit and Municipal Courts of the State of Florida.
Collier County in any litigation arising out of the Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
properly executed as of the day and year first above written.
3
~-
WITNESS:
Witness Signature
PrintedlTyped Witness Name
Witness Signature
PrintedlTyped Witness Name
Witness Signature
PrintedfTyped Witness Name
Witness Signature
PrintedfTyped Witness Name
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 123 of 142
ELIAS BROTHERS COMMUNITIES
AT PALERMO COVE, INC., a Florida
corporation
By:
RONI ELIAS, President
WATERWAYS JOINT VENTURE IV,
a Florida general partnership
By:
RICHARD DAVENPORT, President
4
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 124 of 142
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
,2004 by RONI ELIAS, as President of ELIAS BROTHERS
COMMUNITIES AT PALERMO COVE, INC., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the
corporation and who is personally known to me or who has produced
as identification.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
PrintlType Name of Notary
Commission No.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
,2004 by RICHARD DAVENPORT, as President of WATERWAYS
JOINT VENTURE IV, a Florida general partnership on behalf of said partnership and
who is personally known to me or who has produced
as identification.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
PrintIType Name of Notary
Commission No.
NOTE: The timing of construction of a stormwater management berm has not been
delineated in this Agreement. Specific times frames should be established before the
document is finalized.
#1274232v1
5
-~:;~-Y1iI-;~-;~j
1IOCId'f(,,--.s~ .u
"'"
and!:! 31\0':> OW1:l37V d
~NJ!/3.:1:JIl8 G3WHS
......
-
,-..,.,
...-
"'.to
.-
"JNJ :;AO.J OVtl!/37'1d .L'I
S3I.J.JNnnwO:J S1l3HJ.O!/EI S1f1'7:t.."
"""
- - ..
--
"V" J!qJIIX:J
.+ I.
-I
I'
. .
I I.
I -II i
I
I.
-.
,I
wi'
8z
~:5
'" ~~
" >~
't .........,..1 __
o~
~ UUl
).... 0<
....
~ ~;E ~
.... >>
~ ~o ~I 11
~ ~~
~ <~. ~~
0-.:.
c:::::: :::
JI II
~2
~
~
I
.
I
.
I
fl_
-~,
L..JI
-~
II,
III
Iii
[--lJ
o
ja.
i
~
"'i':i~'-:;-
=. ............ .
~Ii
. I
--
"'"""""'"
.....
"'-
-
oo:z:_
...
. I
.
,oJ
C<NlIIlUMC
or IIlW)
lIGWI' ..
WAY !.ME:
20' _
......
.'~
Nov 01, 200. - IJ:lJ:J9
... ....... l""no IOWUI'IIUA}
111',,=~'I'
1'-..0
_1S(1lO' -...)
YI.OlOI
M:SlDDrnIAL IUlI.DINQ
~
CIlIUC1UJIl
-
_or_
21 'f'IAIt srllOt
May 10, 2005
Page 126 of 142
...-
-- """'.
If -.os
'0'
WJ.(~'
0:\2ooJ\03-0725,07 ARl/ - Palormo COWl IfPUO Rozoning\OOOJ Rozonlng\RPUO ot WaCor Afon<>9omont 1'101lS\Submlteo^Rovia;on #J\JOI25XOI.d"'g
DAm
NOV" 2004
SCALE:
N,T.S.
nw T ANC E~eers.
~NSULTING Surveyors & Mappers,
-....... W W..L .... PWmers, Project Managers
3050 North HorIe8hOll DrivlI, SuH, 270
Nal*a. Florid8 34104
Phone: (239) 84&-1509
FAX: (:/39~ 848-71156
ItIfrAIAl FaaltrD nllClIIII ELM'TIOH
--
-
~eTION C-C
Exhibit "B"
CLIENT: ELIAS
AT PALERM.O
PALERMO COVE
CROSS SECTION
BROTHERS COMMUNITIES
COVE, INC.
RPUD
C-C
DRAWN IIY:
P.W.S,
CHECKED IIY:
D,H.N.
SEC: 'TWP: RGE: PROJECTO 3 0 1 2 6 0 1 SHEET 1 3
34 48S 26E NUMBER: - . NUMBER: OF
TITLE:
~IG~8ER: 301 26 X 0
,-...
; .
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
Agenda Item No. 80
DRA:fZrT~~~
.
.....J.
THIS DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into this
day of , 20_, by and between ELIAS BROTHERS COMMUNITIES
AT PALERMO COVE, INC., a Florida corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Elias")
and GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT, an independent
special fire control district of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "District").
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, Elias is developing a residential project to be known as "Palermo
Cove"; and
WHEREAS, the District and Palermo Cove have common property boundary's
ad delineated in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, Elias and the District have determined that it is in their common best
interests to enter into a Developer's Agreement for the purpose of funding and
construction of a stormwater management berm along their common boundary line.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good
and valuable consideration and the mutual covenants and obligations set forth below,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Purpose. The sole purpose of this Agreement is to provide a mechanism
for the parties to construct a stormwater management berm along their common
boundary line.
2. Stormwater Management Berm. A common stormwater management
berm will be constructed in that area delineated on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference. The berm will be located equally on both the Elias
and District properties and will have a ten-foot wide flat top that will serve as the location
for any required landscape plantings, such that it meets the requirements of a ''Type Bn
Buffer, as prescribed by the Collier County Land Development Code. The cost of the
berm construction, landscaping and irrigation shall be individually borne by the parties
hereto. A cross-section of the proposed berm has been attached hereto as Exhibit "8
and is incorporated herein by reference.
3. Responsibility For Construction. Elias 'shall have the responsibility to
construct the berm and install the landscaping and irrigation referenced herein within
their project boundary. Likewise, the District shall have the responsibility to construct
the berm and install the landscaping and irrigation referenced herein within their project
boundary.
4. !!!:!n. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for a duration
of ten (10) years from the effective date indicated above unless terminated earlier as
provided herein. This termination date shall not affect the duration of any agreement
referenced herein. - ----
DRAFT
November 24, 2004
RE-SUBMnTAL
PUOZ-1OO4-AR-6258
PROJECT #2004040001
DATE: 1:zt1104
MICHAEL DERUNTZ
. .
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 128 of 142
5. Notice. All notices and other items required to be given and delivered
under the terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing, addressed to the parties as
follows:
If to Elias:
Elias Brothers Communities, Inc.
Attn: Roni Elias, President
15100 Collier Boulevard
Naples, Florida 34119
If to District:
Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District
Attn: Chief Donald Peterson
4741 Golden Gate Parkway
Naples, FL 34116-6901
All notices required to be given under this Agreement shall be given in writing, either: (i)
hand-delivered, (ii) sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or (iii) federal
express or similar overnight service, or (iv) sent via facsimile. All notices shall be
addressed to the party being noticed and shall be deemed to have been given (i) when
delivered by hand-delivery; (ii) three (3) business days after depositing in a U.S. Post
Office or official letter box, if sent by certified mail, (iii) one (1) business day after timely
deposited in a federal express or similar overnight service depository, or (iv) upon
confirmation of receipt by sender if sent via facsimile.
6. Amendment. Any amendments to this Agreement shall not bind any of
the parties hereto unless such amendment is in writing and executed by all the parties,
subject to the approval process. Any amendment to this agreement shall be binding
upon the parties as soon as it has been executed by all of the parties.
7. Entire Aareement. This Agreement, together with any exhibits attached
hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no prior written
documents, and no prior or contemporary oral statements, representations, promises, or
understandings not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force and/or effect.
8. Litiaation. In the event any party commences litigation to enforce such
party's rights hereunder, the non-prevailing party in such litigation shall bear the
reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred by the prevailing party in such litigation,
including those incurred on appeal, if any be taken.
9. Headinas. Captions and paragraph headings contained in this
Agreement are for convenience and reference only; in no way do they define,
described, extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any provision hereof.
10. Gender. All terms and words used in this Agreement, regardless of the
number and gender in which used, shall be deemed to include any other gender or
number as the context or the use thereof may require.
2
'4,
. .
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10. 2005
Page 129 of 142
11. Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective
unless it is in writing signed by the party against whom it is asserted, and any waiver of
any provision of this Agreement shall be applicable only to the specific instance to which
it is related and shall not be deemed to be a continuing or future waiver as to such
provision or a waiver as to any other provision.
12. Counteroarts and Fax Cocies. This Agreement may be executed in
several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which
shall constitute one in the same agreement; provided however, that each of the
counterparts shall have been executed by both the parties hereto. Facsimiles copies
shall be acceptable.
13. Survival. All covenants, agreements, statements, representations,
indemnifications and warranties made by each of the parties in this Agreement
(including any annexed instruments and documents), or in any document or instrument
delivered by each of the parties pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, shall
survive the termination of the Term of this Agreement, and the delivery of all
consideration and documents pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, and shall not be
deemed merged or extinguished by any other action, agreement, instrument or
document.
14. Enforcement and Governina Law. This Agreement shall be governed
by, construed and enforced under the laws of the State of Florida. The parties hereby
submit to the jurisdiction of, and waive any venue restrictions against, the U.S. District
Court for Florida and the Circuit and Municipal Courts of the State of Florida, Collier
County in any litigation arising out of the Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
properly executed as of the day and year first above written.
3
"
. .
WITNESS:
Witness Signature
PrintedfTyped Witness Name
Witness Signature
PrintedfTyped Witness Name
Witness Signature
PrintedfTyped Witness Name
Witness Signature
PrintedfTyped Witness Name
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 130 of 142
ELIAS BROTHERS COMMUNITIES
AT PALERMO COVE,INC., a Florida
corporation
By:
RONI ELIAS, President
GOLDEN GATE FIRE AND RESCUE
DISTRICT ESTATES, an independent
special fire control district of the State
of Florida
By:
CHARLES MCMAHON, Chairman
4
~
'.
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 131 of 142
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2004 by RONI ELIAS, as President of ELIAS BROTHERS
COMMUNITIES AT PALERMO COVE, INC., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the
corporation and who is personally known to me or who has produced
as identification.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
PrintIType Name of Notary
Commission No.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
,2004 by CHARLES MCMAHON, as Chairman of GOLDEN GATE
FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT, on behalf of said independent special fire
control district of the State of Florida and who is personally known to me or who has
produced as identification.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
PrintIType Name of Notary
Commission No.
NOTE: The timing of construction of a stormwater management berm has not been
delineated in this Agreement. Specific time frames should be established before the
document is finalized.
#1274187v1
5
o,..n
COO
,-.~
o
E';,
2m
-;;:2
"'0
c:
Q)
Cl
<(
----- --Yllt-----n
...a...w ~..... .~ . S 0
IAIIdop( " GllI'auns ,
, ':lHl
.+
. .
r
@~
~.
.~
~
g:~
~ O~
~~ U~
, O~
to ~@ ~
.... I
"t: 'In
~ ~2
~e
Gnffli lAO.J OWH3'7Yd
~Nl!l3.:i.:if18 Q3'lJVHS
.....
-.,
."1-1"
--
. 'I"l.N
......
1ft'.. ""
.... ..
.......
':JNI '3AO:J OAA/31Vd .L v
S3IJ.JNfJWW.Q;) Sll3HJ,Ollf{ s'v'l1t."
"v" nQ,qx3
-I-
"
I.
",
,
I.
"'
"
-jG
...lIIQ.....c __
::::::: :::
~III
Ii ii
, ii
o
~
i
leI I
~ I ~
~ !,
~ ~
f i
~
d'
III
In
rc=-~tJ
'"
I
r;- f]1
IC__:__J
....... . .....
"~:=; =
~II
J . I
--
"""'-
--
10 ...,..,
--
""""-
....
\- '. '.
Nov or. 2004 - 71:27:41
"""-
MrNC I'IOIfr D.fV.
Exhibit "B"
"'lfIl
IDCt
~
May 10, 2005
Page 133 of 142
"'=,., ........ .-
U1C SEC"nDN 4.0L0S.C.1 1.
&r","f~'~
O:\200J\OJ-0126,OI ARM - Palormo Coye RPUO Ruoninq\OOOJ Ro.oning\RPUO ~ Wot", Management Pfons\Sl/om'llol\Roy;sion !1\JOl26X02,d..g
00t0TE:
NOV., 2004
11 W J:! ~C, Engineers,
CONSULTIk! Surveyors & Mappers,
...." y Y.L ..L Planners, Project Mansgers
3050 Nor1l1 HoMshoe Drive. Suil& 270
Naples, Florida 34104
Phone: (239) 649-1509
FAX: (:ta9) 64&-7058
SCAlL
N.T,S.
a-
l.lICl_
.-.
~~ON IS~
~W." .
UPON F1lW. ROOMY
SEC'IION D-D
DRAWN BY:
P,W,B.
C"(CKEO BY:
D,H,N.
SEe: lWP: RC~ PROJECTQ 3 0 1 26 0 1 5HEtr 2 3
34 485 26E NUMBER: - . NUMBER: OF
TITLE:
~0~8ER: 30126XO
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10. 2005
Page 134 of 142
Item V.B
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
......"c':~~.-::_--_.__..~',-~.;":",=',";--_.. .,
STAFF REPORT
. MEETING OF Aurll 6, 2005
I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT:
Petition No.:
P~titiOD Name:
Applican t/Developer:
PUDZ-2004-AR-6258
PALERMO COVE'PUD
Elias Brothers Communities at Palermo
Cove, Inc.
Dwight Nadeau,AICP, RW A, INC.
Passarella and Associates, Inc.
Engineering Consultant:
Environmental Consultant:
n. LOCATION:
The property is located on the north of Wolfe Road, and west of Collier BoUlevard
(CR 951) in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida.
m. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES:
The property to the north is zoned Indigo Lakes PUD (formerly Wyndam Park)
developed as single-family residential (3.04 DU/A), Summit Place. in Naples
developed as single-family and multiple-family residences (4 DU/A), and Golden
'<Gate Fire Department (GGFD) Station 13 MPUD developed ascotrimercia1 and
. essential ,services. The property to the east is zoned Vanderbilt Country Club
POO developed as single-family and multiple-family residence (234 DU/A) and
both developed and undeveloped Estates lots. The property to the south is zoned
Wolfe Creek PUD undeveloped single-family residences. and Nagel-Craig
Business Park PUD (potential) proposed commercial center. The property to the
west is zoned Islandwalk PUD developed as single-family and multiple- family
residence (3.04 DU/A)
ZONING
DESCRIPTION
N-
Indigo Lakes POO, and
Brittany Bay Apartments PUD
Single and multiple-family
residential development,
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 135 of 142
Page 2 of8
S - Wolfe Creek PUD and , Private Roadway then partially
Nagel- Cfaig Business Park PUD '-deveiopedsingle-1amily remdcntial-----------.,. _n~
(potential) and commercial development
E - Summit Place In Naples RPUD,
Golden Gate Fire Department
(GGFD) Station 73 MPUD, and
Vanderbilt County Club PUD
Multiple-family residential
commercial and essential service
development and County Road 951
W - Islandwalk PUD
Single and multiple-family
residential development
IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The subject site consists of 131 acres, and has a zoning designation of Rural
Agricultural (A) district. The subject property is located in the Urban (Mixed Use
DistrictJUrban Residential Subdistrict) designation. The maximum density
permissible in the Rural Agricultural District within the Urban (Urban - Mixed
Use District, - Urban Residential Subdistrict) is four dwelling units per acre, based
upon the Density Rating System of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The
subject site is presently undeveloped. The proposed density of Palermo Cove
RPUD is a maximum 524 residential dwelling units. The subject property
incorporates two tracts of lands that are located diagonally to each other and are
connected at the comer of these two-tracts. An access easement has been
provided to transition the internal roadway system within the property. The
project master plan includes a mixture of residential, recreational and preserves
land uses. The plan includes the improvement of East-West Wolfe Road, and the
interface with the property to the north (Summit Place In Naples Subdivision, arid
Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District Station 73). A water management
easement, to benefit Collier County for the Collier Boulevard six-laning project, is
proposed to be located near the. eastern end of the subject property. A shared
perimeter land use buffer with the Golden Gate Fire Department (GGFD) Station
73 MPUD is proposed.
V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element:
The subject property is designated Urban (Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban
Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth
Management Plan. Relevant to this petition, this subdistrict permits residential
development (a variety of unit types) at a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre,
subject to the Density Rating System; and recreation and open space uses. This
Me Meeting
Agenda Item No. aD
May 10, 2005
Page 136 of 142
Page 3 of8
project does not qualify for any density bonuses and is not subject to density
reduction. Accordinglr, ~~s..s~e i~ eli~ble for 4 dwellingUI1its per acre. .
~Y. _._'..."',...,.......'~.~w... ~ ~ .~ .,,' ." .......',~ __ ~ ~~_...,' ..".,......,......'..~,.._ -___'='.------._.__~
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with the surrounding
area Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to Current Planning staff
as part of their review of the petition in its totality.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes: .
1. The proposed uses for the site may be deemed consistent with the FLUE.
2. The proposed density for this site (4.0 DUI A) may be deemed consistent
with the Future Land Use Element.
Conservation & Coastal Mana2ement Element:
Objective 2.2. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the
Growth Management Plan states "All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging
. into estuaries shl!l1 meet all applicable federal, state, or local water quality
standards" .
To accomplish that, policy 2.2.2 states "In order to limit the specific and
cumulative impacts of stonnwater runo~ stonnwater systems should be designed
in such a way that discharged water does not degradercceiving waters and an
attempt is m~e to enhance the timing, quantity, and quality of fresh water .
(discharge) to the estuarine system". .
This project is consistent with the objectives of policy 2.2.2 in that it attempts to
mimic or 'enhance the quality and quantity of water leaving the site by utilizing
lakes and interconnected wetlands tc) provide water quality retention and peak
fl9w attenuation. during sto:rm. ,events.
The project as proposed is consistent with the Policies in Objective 6.1 and 6.2 of
the Conservation & Coastal Management Element, for the following reasons:
Twenty-five percent (25 %) of the existi~g native vegetation is required to be
retainedC)n~site and set aside as preserve areas with conservation easements
prohibiting further development. This project is proposing to retain artd preserve
26.2 % of the existing native vegetation on-site., Selection Ofpreservation areas,
are consistent with the criteria listed in Policy 6.1.1.
Habitat management and exotic vegetation removal/maintenance plans are
required at the time of Site Development Plan/Construction Plan submittal.
Preserve areas shall be required to be maintained free of Category I invasive
exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council.
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 137 of 142
Page 4 of8
Littoral shelf planting areas within wet detention ponds shall be required at the
.-tiiile of site DeveIOpment Plan/Construction Pla:f(submltta1,aiidwill be -reqUirecr-
to meet the minimum planting area requirement in Policy 6.1.7.
The requirement for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to Policy
6.1.8 has been satisfied.
. Jurisdictional wetlands have been identified as required in PoliCies 6.2.1 and
6.2.2. Pursuant to Policy 6.2.4, the County shall requ4'eappropriate agency
permits prior to the issuance of a final local development order permitting site
improvements (Site Development Plan). As stated in Policies 6.2.3 and 6.2.4,
where permits issued by jurisdictional agencies allow for impacts to wetlands
within the Urban Designated Area and require mitigation for such impacts, this
shall be deemed to meet the objective of protection and conservation of wetlands
and the natural functions of wetlands within this area.
In accordance with Policy 6.2.6, required preservation areas are identified on the
PUD master plan. Allowable uses within the preserve areas are included in the
PUD document. Uses within preserve areas shall not include any aCtivity
detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, or fish
and wildlife conservation and preservation.
A wildlife survey for listed species in accordance with Policy 7.1.2 is included in
the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Wildlife habitat management plans for
listed species are required at the time of Site Development Plan/Construction Plan
submittal.
VI. MAJOR ISSUES;
Stormwater Manae:ement:
Palermo Cove is within the four square mile area, known as. the HarVey Drainage
. basin. The basin is bounded by Rte 951 on the East, Vanderbilt Beach Road on
the south, 1-75 on the west, and Immokalee Road on the north. The entire Harvey
Basin has an allowable discharge rate of 0.055 cfs/acre.
The South Florida Water Management District has taken a holistic approach to
projects in this basin. The general flow in the basin is to the southwest, which
puts most of the flow through the Islandwalk PUD lake system to the west of
Palermo Cove, and discharge from this project is into a slough to the south which
eventually flows into the Islandwalk lake system.. The entire basin discharges into
the D-2 Canal on the east side ofI-75.
L_
EAe Meeting
Agenda Item No. 8D
May 10, 2005
Page 138 of 142
Page Sof8
The internal stormwater management system for Palermo Cove consists of six
, iiitercolUlecfedTa1Ces~- five'dry'" detennon area.s-;-a:natWo wetlands"' tliarpfoViae--~-c- -----.=
water quality retention and peak flow attenuation.
Environmental:
Site DescriDtlon:
The 131.23 aCre site is surrounded by ,residential development and is heavily
infested with invasive exotic vegetation. The site is comprised of pine and cypress
wetlands, upland pine :tlatwoods, 'and melaleuca stands. All the vegetative
communities on the site are impacted to varying degrees with invasive exotic
vegetation.
According to the Collier County Soils Map, the following soil types are found
on the property: Holopaw fine sand, limestone subs1ratum (Soil Map Unit 2);
Basinger Fine Sand (Soil Map Unit 17); and Holopaw fine sand (Soil Map
Unit 27).
Nails marking biological indicators (i.e., lichen lines, adventitious rooting, etc.) of
wetland seasonal water levels were set in the field and were surveyed by RW A,
Inc. The development has been designed not to affect pre-deve10pment wetland
hydroperiods. Con1rol elevations for the stormwater management system will
be established based on the elevations of the biological indicators of wetland
water levels.
Wedands:
There are ,106.44 acres of SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands onsite~ Th,e
SFWMDwetland lines were approved by the SFWMD during'site visits on
March 11,2004. The construction of the project will result in dir~ct wetland
impacts to 72.27 acres oftbe on-site wetlands. The wetland mitigation plan for
the project preserves 35.01 acres (26.7 percent) of the property. The mitigation
plan involves the enhancement and preservation of34.13 acres of wetlands and
enhancement and preservation of i .26 acre of upland preserves. Wetland and
upland enhancement will include the removal of exotic and nuisance
vegetation.
EAe Meeting
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 139 of 142
Page 60f8
Preservation Reauirements:
',_. OftlieT3 r"acre-site; oilly 56.18 acres support ilative vegemtioil"iiiiaare-tiSed mtlie=----~h-~,'-,--.,,-;-
preservation calculation. The remainder of the site consists' of disturbed areas and
exotic vegetation.
Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth
Management Plan requires that Twenty~tive percent (25%) of the existing native
vegetation be retained on-site and set aside as preserve, and to be protected by a
permanent conservation easement to prohibit further' devel()pment. The native
vegetation requirement for this site is based on the 56.78 acres of pine flatwoods
and pine/cypress wetlands. A minimum of 14.2 acres of native ve.getation is
'required to be preserved on site. The project proposes to preserve 14:9 acres of
native vegetation as well as an additional 20.1 acres of exotic infested areas to be
enhanced and satisfies this requirement.
Listed SDecies:
A listed species survey was conducted on the property on August 1,2003;
November 18 and 20, 2003; December 17,2003; and January 28,2004 by
Passarella and Associates, Inc. The listed species survey report is inoluded as
Exhibit J in the EIS. No listed species were observed on the site.
. VII. RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of Palermo Cove PUD with the following
stipulations:
Stormwater Manal!ement:
1. Palermo Cove is required to obtain a SFWMD surface water management
permit or equivalent prior to approval of any Site Development plan or
Construction Plans and Plat.
Environmental:
No additional stipulations.
EAe Meeting
Page 7 of8
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 140 of 142
PREPAR.ED~~=-'"'='''~~='~''''''''''''''''''~~~~~''''-''''' """ ,,,,,,",, ,..-.
[.~
CRISTINA SANCHE
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
~
DATE
~
DATE
~~
DA
EAe Meeting
Agenda Item No. 80
May 10, 2005
Page 141 of 142
Page 80f8
REVIEWED BY:
~. ..... ........ "'_~"__R'___' ._..~. .....__ ~__ . .-- -'. ..
'-_~~'"'_''''_'''.''' _, .~":::-, ._.. -... . J:'"'__ _'~"'_'.... ',. "';~~".""--~~~~-.-. .,~._._ "_ ... '.,.., .'....~_..,___~~~._.,..___._.,~
BARBARA S. BURGESON
PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
DATE
WilLIAM D. LORENZ, Jr., P.E. DIRECTOR
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE
SUSAN MURRAY, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE
DEP ARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APPROVED BY:
JOSEPH K. SCHMITT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ADMlNISTRA TOR
&
DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
O..nN
C:OO~
_ 0..-
'N__
.0
ON
- .- '<t
a3 >-..-
:::mQ)
t1l:2 Ol
"'0 m
c: a...
Q)
Cl
<(
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 58
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve a Resolution authorizing the submission of a low interest State Revolving
Fund (SRF) Loan application to the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection for the construction of the Reclaimed Water Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Project, and to adopt the document called "Collier County Aquifer
Storage and Recovery Facilities Plan, March, 2005" to allow the County to avail
itself of a low-interest SRF loan for this Project, 74030.
OBJECTIVE: The public purpose of this project is to implement Aquifer Storage and
Recovery technology in order to protect the public water supply by increasing the
available reclaimed water to be used for irrigation. This action request is to allow the
County to obtain a low-interest State Revolving Funds (SRF) loan for this project.
CONSIDERATIONS: Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) is a method of increasing
the available water supply by storing excess water in underground aquifers, and
recovering it when needed to satisfy peak demands. The County has identified the need
for reclaimed water storage in order to expand and maximize the effectiveness of the
County's existing reclaimed water program. ASR provides the most cost effective means
to achieve those storage objectives for reclaimed water. An exploratory well was
completed in May 2002. A report on the findings show that the Livingston Road site is
favorable for implementing ASR, and a suitable ASR storage zone has been identified.
Collier County is seeking a low interest SRF loan from the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) in the amount of$1 0, 180,314. These funds will be used
for the construction of the Wastewater Capital Project - Reclaimed Water Aquifer
Storage & Recovery. The initial phase of the project for which we are seeking SRF
funding consists of constructing one pilot ASR well and two deep well monitor wells and
associated facilities. Upon completion, it is anticipated that the well will accept injectate
water and recover water at a rate of 1.0 to 1.5 MGD. The next phase of the project will
have four additional ASR wells installed at the project site for a total of 5 wells.
Staff negotiated fees with Angie Brewer and Associates to obtain their assistance to
acquire this SRF loan from FDEP in the amount of $ 20,274 (not to exceed). The work to
be performed includes the Request for Inclusion, the Loan Application and Loan
Agreement phases. Additional services associated with this loan for bidding through
construction and loan closeout are not included but will be negotiated at the appropriate
time.
--
Project permit status:
. The FDEP permit to construct the ASR well and associated facilities were issued on
October 21, 2003.
. The FDEP Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) was issued on February 14,2005.
. The Community Development & Environmental Services (CDES) "Special
Treatment Permit." for the jurisdictional wetlands was received.
. Outstanding permits include the United States Army Corp of Engineers Permit
(USACE) and CDES site development plan (SOP). Issuance of the SOP is
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Executive Summary Page 2 of 58
Reclaimed Water ASR -SRF Funding
Page 2
contingent on receipt of the USACE permit. Staff anticipates receipt of these
outstanding permits in the next few weeks.
. A FDEP permit application will be submitted for a substantial modification to the
North County Water Reclamation Facility permit to incorporate this new ASR
project. This application will include the design specifications and plans for the
project. An application for a FDEP minor modification will be made to the South
County Water Reclamation Facility to clarity that the treatment facilities are
interconnected and share flow to the new ASR site.
. Final design should be completed this May. The site clearing and well drilling
portion of the project will be bid once the SOP and USACE permits are received.
The other work related to the pumps and treatment facility will be bid after receipt of
the FDEP modification permits. Award of the construction contracts will be brought
before the Board of County Commissioners for approval.
SRF next steps: A draft of the Facility Plan has been provided to the FDEP and the State
Clearinghouse and their review process has begun. Remaining steps are:
. Adoption of the Facility Plan by the Board and submittal to the FDEP for final
approval.
. Once biddable plans and specifications, site certification, and permit(s) are
provided, FDEP will review and issue an Authorization to Incur Costs (which
allows the County to proceed with the project prior to loan execution).
. Tentative A ward of the construction contract (Board of County Commissioners
approval) .
. The project will then be placed on the Fundable List; the resolution approving the
final SRF loan application and authorization to execute a loan agreement will be
submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for approval.
. Additional services for Angie Brewer & Associates, L.c., required by this loan
for bidding through construction and loan closeout, will be negotiated following
project approval by FDEP.
FISCAL IMPACT: The construction cost of the above project, including construction of
the four future wells, will be approximately $7,600,000. Adding allowances provided for
in the SRF program, the anticipated total loan value is $10,180,314. The anticipated SRF
interest rate is 2.79%. As the SRF rate may fluctuate by calendar quarters, a rate of 3.0%
will be used to calculate the anticipated Annual payments of $816,716, which also
includes required coverage (at 120%). The estimated cost savings of using the 20 year
SRF Loan for project funding is approximately $3.6 million versus a 20 year bond at
current market rates. Funds for this Project are included in the fiscal year 2005 Capital
Budget for the Wastewater User Fee Funds, approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on September 23,2004.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The Project is included in and is consistent
with the 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update adopted by this Board on May 25, 2004,
Agenda Item 10C.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners, as Ex-officio the
Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District:
Agenda Item No. BE
May 10, 2005
Executive Summary Page 3 of 58
Reclaimed Water ASR -SRF Funding
Page 3
1. Approve the attached Resolution to adopt the document titled "Collier County
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facilities Plan, March, 2005" to allow Collier
County to avail itself of a low-interest SRF loan; and
2. Authorize the Public Utilities Engineering Director to execute the document titled
"Certification of Public Participation."
Preoared by: Alicia Abbott, Project Manager, Public Utilities Engineering.
Item Number
Item Summary
Me.ting Date
Agenda Item No, BE
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 58
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BE
This item to be heard at 4:00 p.m. Approve a Resolution authorizing the submission of a
low interest State Revolving Fund fSRF) Loan application to the Florida Department of
En\lironm~ntal Protection for the construction of the Reclaimed Water Aquifer S10rage iilnd
Recovery Project, and to adopt tne document called "Collier County Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Facilities Plan, March 2005" to allow the County 10 avail itself of a low~interest
SRF loan forthis Project, 74030,
5/10l2005 9:00'00 AM
Prepared By
Project Manager
4t111200S 7:48:07 AM
Alicia Abbott, E.!.
Public UtHrtitrS
Date
Public Ublilies Engineering
Wn!'tewatel Oimt:tor
Oide
Approve4 By
Jo!;eph B. Che.dhmn
Public Utilities.
WasteWater Treatment
4111120054:41 PM
Principal Project Manuge-r
O<ste
Approved By
William O. Mullin, PE
Public: Utilitiles
Public Utilith!$ EngillflfU"ing
4,112flOQ511:S4 AM
Operations Director
Date
Approved By
Thomas Wides
Public UtilIties
P;,blic Utifiti(ls Operations
4/26/20054:08 PM
Roy B. Anden;on, P,E.
Public Utilities. Engineering Direl;tor
Cate
Approved By
Pu b lie Utilities
Public Utilities Engineering
4-f261:!005 12:4C PM
Approved By
JilO'lfl5 W. Delony
~ublk: UtIlities
Public Utilitie.. Admini$tmfor
Date
Public Utilities Administration
4/26/2005 1 :54 PM
Adlnilli$tmtive ASSiistant
Date
Approved By
OMS Cuurdinator
County Manager's Office
Offictl: of Management & Budget
4/26/2005 <l:12 PM
Senior M.anagementlBudget Analyst
Dale
Approved By
Sus..n U~har
County Mllnnll(~r'!; OffiCI!
Offic:n of Ma"a'!j1etntlllt &, Bud!JI~t
5/3/2005 11:38 AM
Management & Budget Director
D<rte
Approved By
Mic.hael Smy1<owski
County Manager's Offi-ce
ONicc or rJlanagemcnt & 8\ldgct
5!3f2005 4:35 PM
County Manager
Date
Approved By
James; V. Mudd
Board of County
Commis.sioners
County Munagr.r's ONic:t!
5j312:D05 7:24 PM
Collier County
Public Utilities Engineering Department
Agenda Item No. BE
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 58
April 5, 2004, Updated 4-7-05
Reclaimed Water Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project
Proiect Management Plan
I. Background
Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) is a technology for storing large volumes of water in the
subsurface. This technology provides water storage at costs much lower than traditional surface
storage methods. ASR uses an underground aquifer as a reservoir to store excess water, and later
the stored water is withdrawn from the aquifer for use. The water is placed into storage using a
specially designed well; the same well is also used to remove the water from storage. It is
possible to store more than a billion gallons of treated water and later withdraw this water for
distribution to water customers or to meet other water needs.
II. Project Goals and Objectives
Collier County has identified the need for 140 million gallons of reclaimed water storage in order
to expand and maximize the effectiveness of the County's existing reuse program. ASR provides
the most cost-effective means to achieve these storage objectives for reclaimed water. Even with
the extensive reuse program that Collier County has, during rainy periods when irrigation
demand is low, excess reclaimed water must be disposed of using percolation ponds and deep
injection wells. However, with adequate seasonal storage reclaimed water can be used much
more effectively; reducing irrigation withdrawals from surface or groundwater systems during
critical dry season periods and reducing loss of valuable freshwater resources.
IV. Project Team
Collier County Key Personnel -
Alicia Abbott, Project Manager
William Mullin, Principal Project Manager
Roy Anderson, P.E., Director, Utilities Engineering
James Delony, P.E., Administrator, Public Utilities
Joe Cheatham, Director, Wastewater Department
Bob Casey, Reuse Coordinator
Water Resource Solutions Project Manager - Lloyd Horvath
Angie Brewer & Associates, L.c. - Mark Brewer
V. Project Approach
The scope of the project is to construct one pilot ASR well and two deep monitor wells. The
project will create a facility for the storage and recovery of more than 140 million gallons of
reclaimed water. It is anticipated that upon completion, the proposed well would accept and
recover water at a rate of about 1.0 MGD. Injection would occur over a 90 to 120-day period
during the wet season, or whenever excess wastewater was available. Recovery would take
place on an as-needed basis to increase dry season reclaimed water flows to County reuse
customers.
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
. ... . Pag~ 6 of 58
Plans and contract specIficatIOns wIll be submItted to the County for revIew and test/constructIOn
permits will be obtained prior to start of construction.
The principal goals of the project are to:
. Increase availability of reclaimed water,
. Decrease the loss of reclaimed water using traditional disposal methods, and
. Reduce dependence on freshwater aquifers to meet dry season
On successful completion and operation of the first ASR well, four additional reclaimed water
ASR wells will be constructed at the site.
VI. Schedule
The current proposed schedule for the project:
Reclaimed Water Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Project
Schedule
November 15, 2003
Site Development Plan, County Zoning and Development
Applications initiation
November 30, 2003
Site Development Plan, Surveys and Environmental Evaluations
January 1, 2004
Project Design Site Planning, Layout, and Landscaping -
March 30, 2004
Environmental Resource Permit to Department of Environmental
Protection
October 25, 2004
Project Design, Mechanical, Electrical, Piping 60 Percent submittal
January 7, 2005
Receive CDES Special Treatment Permit Approval
February 10, 2005
Project Design, Mechanical, Electrical, Piping 90 Percent submittal
February 14, 2005
Receive Environmental Permits from FDEP
April 15, 2005
Submit FDEP permit applications to modifY NCWRF and SCWRF
April 30, 2005
Receive Environmental Permits from USACOE
May 15, 2005
Receive CDES SOP Permit
May 31,2004
Complete Project Design -Mechanical, Electrical, Piping
July 30, 2005
Contract Bid and Award completed for site work & wells
August 15, 2005
September 15, 2005
Construction initiation for site work & wells
Award Bid for pipeline & treatment facility
Agenda Item No, 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 58
December 15,2005
Well drilling completion
May 25, 2006
Construction completion
June 30, 2006
Startup
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 58
EVENT
Cost
Project Name:
Land Acquisition,
Land use Zoning
Desi n Permit
Construction (est.)
Pilot II Monitoring
wells
Construction (est.)
Pipeline II
Treatment Fac.
$1,250.000
$1,012,000
$1,228,000
Inspection
~
Current Project
Budget
$3,590,000
Recommended Action: Approve a Resolution authorizing the submission of a low interest
State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan application to the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection for the construction of the Reclaimed Water Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project,
and to adopt the document called "Collier County Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facilities Plan,
March, 2005" to allow the County to avail itself of a low-interest SRF loan for this Project, 74030.
Reclaimed Water ASR.
List of Public Notices & Meetine:s
Prepared by: Alicia Abbott
Date: May 5, 2004, Updated April 7, 2005
"Adopt 20 I Facilities Plan Update"
Board of County Commissioners
Award Professional Services Agreement to
Water Resource Solutions, Inc., for Engineering
Services related to Reclaimed Water ASR
Board of County Commissioners
Approve Amendment to Professional Services
Agreement related to Reclaimed Water ASR
Board of County Commissioners
Notice of Draft Permit to Construct an Exploratory Well
Published in the Naples Daily News
FDEP Public Meeting at NCWRF
Notice of intent to issue permit
Published in the Naples Daily News
City/County/FDEP meeting
Presentation to City of Naples, City Council
Approve Amendment to Professional Services
Agreement to WRS to relocate site
Board of County Commissioners
Approve purchase of services from the Florida
Geological Survey for services to obtain continuous
geologic cores to supplement exploratory drilling
Board of County Commissioners
Adopt a resolution to support the implementation
of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Technologies
Board of County Commissioners
Notice of Draft Permit to construct exploratory well at the
Livingston Road Site. Published in the Naples Daily News
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 58
July 22, 1997,
12(C)4, 12(C)5
August 3,1999
16(B)23
December 14, 1999
16(B) 13
April 30, 2000
June 6,2000
June 23,2000
October 3, 2000
January 19, 2001
February 13,2001,
8(C)moved to
Feb. 27, 2001 9(H)
April 10, 2001
16 (C)2
October 9, 2001
16(C)4
October 27,2001
ASR Public Meeting List
4-7-05
FDEP Public Meeting at Veterans Park
Notice of intent to issue permit.
Published in the Naples Daily News
ASR Presentation to Carlton Lakes
ASR Presentation to the Strand
Accept SFWMDIBCB Grant ($50,000)
Board of County Commissioners
Approve an amendment to Water Resource Solutions
(final design, permitting). Board of County Commissioners
FDEP Notice of Draft Permit to Construct ASR well
Published in the Naples Daily News
FDEP Public Meeting
FDEP issued Notice oflntent to issue permit
Published in the Naples Daily News
ASR Presentation to Carlton Lakes Homeowners'
Master Board Meeting
FDEP Notice of Intent to grant Water Quality Criteria
Exemption for the aesthetically based secondary drinking
water standard for color. Published in the Naples Daily News
Amend Big Cypress Basin SFWMD grant for additional time
Board of County Commissioners
Approve amendment to Water Resource Solutions
(Fee rate change). Board of County Commissioners
ASR presentation to Carlton Lakes Homeowners' Association
Department ofthe Army, District Corps of Engineers
Public Notice issued to Homeowners within 500 ft.
Accept SFWMD A WS Grant $450,000
Board of County Commissioners
ASR Presentation to Carlton Lakes Homeowner's Assoc.
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 58
November 28, 2001
December 14,2001
February 7,2002
March 27,2002
February 25, 2003
16( C)6
April 22, 2003
16(C) 5
August 18, 2003
September 30, 2003
October 6, 2003
November 18, 2003
March 8, 2004
March 9, 2004
16(C)5
April 13, 2004
16(C)6
June 24, 2004
June 25, 2004
March 8, 2005
16(C)9
March 24, 2005
2
ASR Public Meeting List
4- 7-05
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 58
Accept SFWMD RIDS Grant - $100,000
Board of County Commissioners
April 12, 2005
16(C)20
Adopt facilities plan for SRF Funds
Board of County Commissioners
May 10, 2005
(Proposed)
3
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 58
CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
(N/A for 319 or 320 funded projects)
Project Sponsor: Collier County
SRF Project Number: WW59716P
Project Description: Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facilities Plan
I do hereby certify to the following:
Collier County held a public meeting on (date) to provide the public with
an opportunity to participate in the planning of the subject project. The meeting was
advertised in accordance with local requirements for public notification.
The following items were addressed during the public meeting:
. Project Descriptions
. Project Costs and the Impact on User Charges
. Evaluation of Project Alternatives
The proposed projects will have the following impact on user charges: The current rate
structure is sufficient to meet debt service requirements.
Certification Completed By:
Roy B. Anderson, P.E.
Signature Printed Name
Director. Public Utilities Enaineerina Division
Title Date
Note: An authorized representative of the project sponsor or the consulting engineers
may complete this certification.
Revised: 4/25/01
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10. 2005
Page 13 of 58
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE COlliER COUNTY AQUIFER STORAGE AND
RECOVERY FACilITIES PLAN, DATED MARCH 2005; AUTHORIZING THE PLAN TO
BE SUBMITTED TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AND TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY TO AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUALS.
WHEREAS, Collier County has determined that the Reclaimed Water Aquifer
Storage & Recovery project recommended in the Collier County Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Facilities Plan should be implemented; and
WHEREAS, staff has requested that the Board of Collier County Commissioners
approve the Collier County Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facilities Plan and Capital
Financing Plan in accordance with State Revolving Fund (SRF) requirements; and
WHEREAS, The County is seeking funding from the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) under its SRF loan program to fund these
improvements to benefit Collier County's Water/Sewer customers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE EX-OFFICIO THE
GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT, that:
1. Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby adopts the Collier
County Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project Facilities Plan (copy attached and
incorporated herein).
2. The Collier County Dedicated Revenue and Capital Financing Plan, having been
delivered to each Board Member for their individual review, is hereby adopted.
3. The Board of County Commissioners hereby authorizes submission of this Plan to the
State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
4. The Collier County Public Utilities Division Administrator is hereby authorized to carry
out the responsibilities under this Loan Program and to delegate authority and
responsibility to staff to carry out all activities to accomplish the goals of the Loan
Program, provided such actions by staff do not make any additional commitments on
the County's behalf without further approval from this Board.
5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
in favor of adoption.
day of
, 2005 after majority vote
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS
EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD
OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-
SEWER DISTRICT
ATTEST:
Deputy Clerk
BY
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
JIh{\ p~
Thomas C. Palmer,
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 58
Collier County
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Facilities Plan
March 2005
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10,2005
Page 15 of 58
Collier County
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Facilities Plan
March 2005
Collier County
County Manager
James Mudd
Public Utilities
Administrator
Fiscal Operations Director
Principle Project Manager
Project Manager
Jim Delony, PE
Tom Wides
Bill Mullin
Alicia Abbott
Consultant
Client Manager
Director of Planning
Planning Coordinator
Angie Brewer & Associates, L.C.
Angie Brewer
Mark Brewer
Ted Fylstra
Kirk Ronnie
Water Resource Solutions
Project Manager Lloyd Horvath
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
Section 1 - Executive Summary
1.1 Description of Projects
1.1.1 Reclaimed Water Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR)
1.2 Planning Areas
1.3 Need for Projects
1.4 Financing the Improvement Projects
Section 2 - Review of Alternatives
2.1 System Background
2.2 Project Alternatives
2.2.1 Reclaimed Water ASR - Alternatives Considered
2.3 Economic Evaluation of Alternatives
2.3.1 Reclaimed Water ASR - Probable Costs
Section 3 - Selected Alternatives
3.1 Reclaimed Water ASR - Selected Alternatives
3.1.1 Reclaimed Water ASR
Section 4 - Environmental Effects
4.1 Adverse Environmental Effects:
4.2 Beneficial Environmental Effects:
Section 5 - Public Participation Process
5.1 Public Meeting Minutes/Advertisement
5.2 Certification of Public Participation
Section 6 - Financial Feasibilitv
6.1 Dedicated Revenue
6.2 Capital Financing Plan
Section 7 - Proiect Schedule
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 58
iii
1
1
1
1
4
4
5
5
6
6
8
8
10
10
10
11
11
11
12
12
12
13
13
13
21
Agenda Item No, 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 58
7.1 Proposed Financial Schedule
7.2 Proposed Construction Schedule - Pilot Project
21
22
Appendix A - Backup Financial Information
23
Appendix B - User Charae Information
25
Appendix C - Public Participation Documents
27
ii
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 58
Acknowledgements
This document was prepared by Angie Brewer & Associates, L.C. for Collier County.
The background information, engineering and design plans contained within this
Facilities Plan are a summary of information provided by Collier County, and by Greeley
and Hansen LLC (Greeley and Hansen). Reference is made to Greeley and Hansen's
2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update, dated May 25, 2004, which is incorporated
throughout this document.
iii
Agenda Item No, 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 19 of 58
~on1-Ex~~eSum~~
The goal of this Facility Plan is to outline how the County will implement an Aquifer and
Storage Recovery Pilot System.
Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) is a method of increasing the available water
supply by storing excess water in underground aquifers, and recovering it when needed
to satisfy peak demands. Collier County has identified the need for 140 million gallons
of reclaimed water storage in order to expand and maximize the effectiveness of the
County's existing reuse program. ASR provides the most cost effective means to
achieve those storage objectives for reclaimed water.
1.1 Description of Projects
1.1.1 Reclaimed Water Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR)
Phase 1 of the project consists of constructing one pilot ASR well and two deep
monitor wells. Upon completion it is anticipated the well will accept injectate water
and recover water at a rate of 1.0 to 1.5 MGD. Injection would occur over a 90 to
120 day period during the wet season, or whenever excess water is available.
Once the pilot well has proved successful, Phase 2 of the project will have four
additional ASR wells installed at the project site for a total of 5 (five) wells.
The total project will create a facility for the storage and recovery of more than 140
million gallons of reclaimed water.
1.2 Planning Areas
The planning area is generally the western one-quarter of Collier County, excluding
Marco Island and the City of Naples. The planning area includes the existing North and
1
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 58
South County Service Areas and various fringe areas east of the existing service areas.
The existing wastewater service area is shown on Figure 1-1 and is comprised of the
North County Service Area and South County Service Area. Wastewater flows in the
North Service Area have been treated at the NCWRF (North County Water Reclamation
Facility). During the tourist season, some flows in the North Service Area are treated at
the Pelican Bay WRF (PBWRF). Wastewater flows in the South Service Area are
treated at the SCWRF (South County Water Reclamation Facility).
The North Service Area is approximately 78 square miles. This area is bounded on the
north by Lee County, on the south by Golden Gate Parkway, on the west by the City of
Naples Service Area and the Gulf of Mexico, and on the east by the Urban Planning
Boundary.
The boundary of the South Service Area has a practical limit in the southern area, which
is bounded by conservation areas. The South Service Area within the practical limit
shown on Figure 1-1 is approximately 58 square miles. This area is bounded on the
north by Golden Gate Parkway, on the south by the Marco Island Service Area and
conservation areas, on the west by the City of Naples Service Area, and on the east by
the Urban Planning Boundary.
Collier County has committed funding and support to the ASR technology. The
proposed reuse water ASR project will utilize reclaimed water from the North County
Water Reclamation Facility. The County has selected a site for the project (off
Livingston Road approximately 0.6 miles north of Immokalee Road) and has submitted
the FDEP permit application. Initial exploration wells have been drilled.
2
;( tG
J; :it
t
~.
-
l'
'"
"'
;;
....-
--
==:.~ wa
-
--
--
- ~
--
-
=--B
-....,... *
--
--
--
==.--- K
--
-
~- --
... ........ -
...~...-.~
....~~.......
.......r:__~
......-... ....
....------
---
--- --...........
WASTEWA TER PLANNING AREA
-...., .... .....- ...
--
~ ~':i: t
l!! ~7 r
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 58
:::
::
;;
Figunr t.1
3
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 22 of 58
1.3 Need for Projects
The goals of the project are:
· Increase availability of reclaimed water,
. Decrease the loss of reclaimed water using traditional disposal methods, and
. Reduce dependence on freshwater aquifers to meet dry season demands for
irrigation.
The opportunity to conserve significant quantities of fresh water and to reduce the
amount of reclaimed water being lost drives this project. During the wet season or other
rainy periods, reclaimed water frequently goes unused. With adequate storage
availability this excess water will be available for beneficial use during the dry season.
Storage of the wet season reclaimed water will reduce demands on potable aquifers
during the dry season.
1.4 Financing the Improvement Projects
Collier County is responsible for financing wastewater improvement projects and
desires to use SRF funding for these projects. Starting with the construction cost
estimate of $7,600,000, the anticipated loan amount is $10,180,314, which includes
contingency, legal, technical, financing and other costs.
4
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10,2005
Page 23 of 58
Section 2 - Review of Altematives
2.1 System Background
Collier County's utility systems are undergoing considerable expansion in response to
the County's growth, which is expected to continue for the next several decades. It is
essential that the infrastructure systems be designed not only to meet the capacity
demands but also continue to properly function during "down" times, i.e. normal
maintenance procedures and during component failure events.
Wastewater service in Collier County will need to be provided in the future in the
following areas:
. Existing sewered areas that develop further in the future.
. New developments within the North and South Service Areas of sufficient density
to require sewer service. (This will most likely be virtually all new development.)
. New developments within the Additional Service Areas.
. The Orange Tree area. (The County currently has an agreement to take over
service of the Orange Tree area in 2011.)
. Golden Gate City - this plant has a design capacity of 0.95 mgd and is owned
and operated by the Florida Government Utilities Association (FGUA).
The existing wastewater service area is shown on Figure 1-1 and is comprised of the
North County Service Area and South County Service Area. Wastewater flows in the
North Service Area have been treated at the NCWRF. During the tourist season, some
flows in the North Service Area are treated at the Pelican Bay WRF. Wastewater flows
in the South Service Area are treated at the SCWRF.
The North Service Area is approximately 78 square miles. This area is bounded on the
north by Lee County, on the south by Golden Gate Parkway, on the west by the City of
5
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 24 of 58
Naples Service Area and the Gulf of Mexico, and on the east by the Urban Planning
Boundary.
The boundary of the South Service Area has a practical limit in the southern area, which
is bounded by conservation areas. The South Service Area within the practical limit
shown on Figure 1-1 is approximately 58 square miles. This area is bounded on the
north by Golden Gate Parkway, on the south by the Marco Island Service Area and
conservation areas, on the west by the City of Naples Service Area, and on the east by
the Urban Planning Boundary.
Wastewater service in the North and South Service Areas is provided by a network of
pumping stations, transmission pipelines, and water reclamation facilities. The NCWRF
receives most of the flow from the North Service Area. The PBWRF has been operated
only during tourist season, when wastewater flows are at their highest. Many pumping
stations are located throughout the service area, Several are master lift stations,
receiving flows from smaller, upstream stations. Many parts of the system are
manifolded, in that several pumping stations feed into a common force main. There are
a total of 345 lift stations serving the North Service Area.
All wastewater in the South Service Area is treated at the SCWRF. All wastewater is
pumped to the SCWRF from master lift stations. There are a total of 290 lift stations that
serve the South Service Area.
2.2 Project Alternatives
2.2.1 Reclaimed Water ASR - Alternatives Considered
Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) is a technology for storing large volumes of
water in the subsurface. This technology provides water storage at costs much
lower than traditional surface storage methods. ASR uses an underground
aquifer as a reservoir to store excess water, and later the stored water is
withdrawn from the aquifer for use. The water is placed into storage using a
specially designed well, the same well is also used to remove the water from
storage. It is possible to store more than a billion gallons of treated water and
6
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 25 of 58
later withdraw this water for distribution to water customers or to meet other water
needs.
2.2.2.1 Reclaimed Water ASR
Alternative 1: Take no action.
Alternative 2: Design and construction of reclaimed water ASR wells.
A pilot well will be drilled at the project site along with two deep monitor wells.
Upon completion it is anticipated the well will accept injectate water and
recover water at a rate of 1.0 to 1.5 MGD. Injection would occur over a 90 to
120 day period during the wet season, or whenever excess water is
available.
Once the pilot well has proved successful. Four additional ASR wells will be
installed at the project site for a total of 5 (five) wells. The project will create a
facility for the storage and recovery of more that 140 million gallons of
reclaimed water.
Alternative 3: Develop alternative storage capabilities.
Options include the purchase of land and development of a Tank Farm or
the development of a lined pond.
7
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 26 of 58
2.3 Economic Evaluation of Alternatives
2.3.1 Reclaimed Water ASR - Probable Costs
2.3.1.1 Reclaimed Water ASR
Alternative 1: No Action
Currently, even with the extensive reuse program that Collier County has
in place, during rainy periods when irrigation demand is low, excess
reclaimed water is disposed of using percolation ponds and deep injection
wells. With adequate storage capability, the County can use the reclaimed
water more efficiently and reduce demand on potable water systems.
The No Action Alternative was rejected for these reasons.
Alternative 2: Design and construction of reclaimed water ASR wells
After design completion, a pilot well will be built at a cost of approximately
$2.3 million. An estimate of probable construction costs provided by Water
Resource Solutions for the Reclaimed Water ASR pilot well is included
below (see Table 2-1). If the pilot ASR well is successful the county will
install four additional ASR wells at the site for a total of five wells. The
additional wells will be constructed at a cost of approximately $1.3 million
each, for a total project cost of $7.6 million.
Alternative 3: Develop alternative storage capabilities.
Investigation of the alternatives of a Tank Farm or a lined pond yielded
costs far in excess of the ASR option primarily due to cost of land. The
Tank Farm and lined pond options were estimated at $49M and $14M
respectively.
Alternative 3 was rejected due to these excessive costs.
8
Agenda Item No. BE
May 10, 2005
Page 27 of 58
Table 2-1
Reclaimed Water ASR
Water Resource Solutions
ASR Well with mobilization and pad
Monitor Well
Pumping Test
Well Pump
$ 260,000
$ 160,000
$ 15,000
$ 55,000
$ 150,000
$ 30,000
$ 35,000
$ 80,000
$ 35,000
$ 50,000
$ 15,000
$ 35,000
$ 110,000
$ 10,000
$ 256,000
$ 12,000
$ 35,000
$ 10,000
$ 15,000
$ 45,000
$ 50,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 5,000
$ 10,000
$ 20,000
$ 35,000
$ 5,000
$ 60,000
$ 45,000
$ 200,000
$ 30,000
$ 50,000
$ 1,953,000
$ 390,600
$ 2,343,600
Plant! Process Systems
Pressure Filters
Sodium Hypochlorite
Injection Pump
Carbon Dioxide System
Hydropneumatic Tank
Yard Piping, Valves & Fittings
Filter Backwash Pond
Backwash Pump Station
UV Disinfection
Pipeline
Tap existing reclaimed main
3200 LF - 16" PVC reuse main wi fittings
300 LF - 4" PVC sanitary force main wi fittings
Jack & Bore installation at Livingston Road and connect to force main
Electrical and Controls
Elect service entrance 480V-3ph-400amp
Distribution SwitchgearlMCCs
Variable Frequency Drives
PLC/Local Operator Control System
Telemetry System HardwarelSoftware
Field Instruments (Flow, Pressure, level)
Field Instruments (Flow, Pressure, level)
Lightning Protection bonding & grounding
Underground Distribution Ductbanks
Installation Conduit & Wire
Independent Electrical Testing
Other Site work
Clearing and Earthwork
Pump and Electrical House
Wall and landscape
Internal road
Enviornmental restoration
Sub total
Contingency @ 20 percent
Total Preliminary Cost opinion
9
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 28 of 58
Section 3 - Selected Altematives
3.1 Reclaimed Water ASR - Selected Alternatives
3.1.1 Reclaimed Water ASR
The selected alternative for the Reclaimed Water ASR project is Alternative 2:
design and construct reclaimed water ASR wells. The components of the pilot
project are listed below:
I. Preconstruction Activities:
A. Review water quality information and conduct detailed hydrogeologic
research
B. Evaluate alternative sites
C. Obtain UIC (Underground Injection Control) permit for test drilling
D. Conduct test drilling program to identify storage zone
II. Preliminary Construction and Site Work
A. Clear site and conduct surveying
B. Fill and install roads and drainage system
C. Install temporary utilities
D. Install landscaping including walls, buffers, environmental restoration and
irrigation system
III. Drilling and testing of Pilot ASR/Monitor Wells
IV. Construct Surface Facilities
V. Construction Documentation
A schedule for pilot project design and construction is outlined in Section 7.
10
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 29 of 58
Section 4 - Environmental Effec1s
4.1 Adverse Environmental Effects:
There will be no known adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or
low-income communities because of this project.
4.2 Beneficial Environmental Effects:
The beneficial environmental effects of the projects include a reduced dependence on
freshwater aquifers to meet dry season needs and reduced dependence on potable
water supplies.
11
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 30 of 58
Section 5 - Public Participation Process
5.1 Public Meeting Minutes/Advertisement
A discussion of the Facilities Plan and Capital Financing Plan will be conducted at a
public meeting of the Collier County Commissioners. The minutes of the meeting and a
Resolution adopting the Facilities Plan and the Capital Financing Plan will be
incorporated into Appendix C of this Facilities Plan when it becomes available.
5.2 Certification of Public Participation
The Certification of Public Participation will be completed after the Public Meeting. The
Public Meeting will contain a discussion of items as required by the SRF Wastewater
Loan Program. The Certification of Public Participation will be incorporated into
Appendix C of this Facilities Plan when it becomes available.
12
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 31 of 58
Section 6 - Financial Feasibility
6.1 Dedicated Revenue
The Dedicated Revenue has been defined as Net Operating Revenues and Wastewater
System Development fees of the Collier County Water-Sewer District's Water and
Sewer Utility systems after payment of debt service.
6.2 Capital Financing Plan
Based on a total construction cost estimate of $7,600,000, and the below SRF
allowances, the total anticipated SRF amortization amount is $10,180,314.
Estimated Construction Cost
Contingency
Technical Services During Construction
Loan Service Fee
Ca italized Interest
7,600,000
760,000
1,330,000
193,800
296,514
The Capital Financing Plan is presented on the following pages. Supporting
documentation, including a proposed amortization schedule can be found in Appendix
A. Based on Affordability Calculation, the County may qualify for an interest rate of
2.79%. As the SRF rate may fluctuate by quarter, a rate of 3.0% will be used in this
CFP.
13
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 32 of 58
CAPITAL FINANCING PLAN
PUBLIC ENTITIES
Collier County
Project Sponsor
James W. DeLony, P.E., Public Utilities Division Administrator
Authorized Representative and Title
3301 East Tamiami Trail, Building H
Mailing Address
Naples, Florida 34112
City, State, and Zip Code
Mark A. Brewer, Client Manager (941) 756-5800
Capital Financing Plan Contact, Title and Telephone Number
9104 58th Drive East, Suite 101
Mailing Address
Bradenton, FL 34202
City, State, and Zip Code
The Department needs to know about the financial capabilities of potential State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan applicants.
Therefore, a financial capability demonstration (and certification) is required well before the evaluation of the actual
loan application.
The sources of revenues being dedicated to repayment of the SRF loan are
Net operating revenues and Wastewater System
Development fees of Collier County
(Note: Projects pledging utility operating revenues shoul attach a copy of the existing/proposed rate ordinance)
c.
Capital Cost*
Loan Repayment Reserve (LRR)(3% of capital cost)
Loan Service Fee (LSF)(2% of capital cost)
Subtotal
Capitalized Interest* *
Total Cost to be Amortized
Interest Rate
Coverage Factor
Annual Debt Service Including Coverage
9,690,000
193,800
9,883,800
296,514
10,180,314
3.00%
1.20 ***
816,716
* Capital Cost = Allowances + Construction Cost (including a 10% contingency) + Technical Services After Bid Opening,
** Estimated Capitalized Interest = Subtotal time Interest Rate times construction time in years divided by two,
*** Coverage may be higher if other than water and sewer operating revenues are pledged,
14
Agenda Item No. BE
May 10, 2005
Page 33 of 58
SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AND PARITY LIENS
List annual debt service beginning two years before the anticipated loan agreement date and continuing at least fJfleen fiscal years, Use additional pages as necessary,
IDENTIFY EACH OBLIGATION
111 112 Water & Sewer Taxable Refunding Revenue 113 Water & Sewer Taxable Refunding Revenue
Bonds - Series 2003N1994A Bonds. Senes 2003B 1994B
Coverage% 125% Coverage% 125%
Insured Yes Insured Yes
114 Water & Sewer Taxable Refunding Revenue fI6 Water & Sewer Taxable Refunding Revenue 116 SRF Loan CS120597070
Bonds. Series 1999A Bonds - Series 1999B
Coverage% 125% Coverage% 125% Coverage% 125%
Insured Yes Insured Yes Insured Yes
FISCAL ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE (PRINCIPAL PLUS INTERESTl TOTAL NON SRF DEBT TOTAL SRF DEBT
YEAR SERVICE W /COVERAGE SERVICE W (COVERAGE
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6
2001 $2,473,465 $2,640,615 $333,020 $1,966,404 $1,060,598 $ -
2002 $2,470,585 $2,642,475 $335,220 $1,967,004 $1,060,598 $
2003 $2,470,490 $2,647,375 $1,247,160 $1,966,004 $1,060,598 $
2004 $2,822,281 $1,646,138 $1,246,160 $1,973,404 $1,060,598 $ -
2005 $2,824,819 $1,683,550 $822,347 $1,968,804 $1,060,598 $ -
2006 $2,819,019 $1,683,550 $817,648 $1,967,604 $1,060,598 $ -
2007 $2,820,856 $1,683,550 $826,518 $1,964,604 $1,060,598 $ -
2008 $2,821,425 $1,683,550 $818,318 $1,974,804 $1,060,598 $ -
2009 $764,975 $3,733,550 $819,318 $1,971,079 $1,060,598 $ -
2010 $4,501,050 $818,363 $1,969,879 $1,060,598 $ -
2011 $4,835,050 $1,970,979 $1,060,598 $ -
2012 $4,835,050 $1,974,154 $1,060,598 $ -
2013 $4,836,550 $1,979,179 $ -
2014 $4,837,175 $1,977,569 $ .
2015 $4,837,125 $1,967,319 $ -
2016 $2,630,875 $1,971,094 $ -
2017 $1,799,000 $ -
2018 $1,798,500 $ -
2019 $1,799,500 $ -
2020 $1,796,750 $ -
2021 $1,790,250 $ -
2022 $ -
2023 $ -
2024 $ -
2025 $ -
2026 $ -
2027 $ -
2028 $ -
2029 $ -
2030 $ -
15
Agenda Item No. BE
May 10, 2005
Page 34 of 58
SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AND PARITY LIENS - Cant'd.
List annual debt service beginning two years before the anticipated loan agreement date and continuing at least fifteen fiscal years, Use add~ional pages as necessary,
IDENTIFY EACH OBLIGATION
#7 SRF Loan CS120597090 #8 SRF Loan CS120597100 #9 SRF Loan CS12059715P
Coverage% 125% CoveragB% 125% Coverage% 125%
Insured Yes Insured Yes Insured Yes
#10 SRF Loan WWG12059715L 01 #11 SRF Loan WWG120597L02 #12 SRF Loen WWG120597L03
Coverage % 125% Coverage % 125 Coverage % 125
Insured Yes Insured Yes Insured Yes
FISCAL ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE (PRINCIPAL PLUS INTERESTI ~
YEAR SERVICE W /COVERAGE SERVICE W /COVERAGE
#7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12
2001 $886,480 $754,400
2002 $886,480 $1,508,800
2003 $886,480 $1,508,800
2004 $886,480 $1,508,800 $210,776
2005 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386
2006 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $1,021,509 $629,288
2007 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2008 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2009 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2010 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2011 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2012 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2013 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2014 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2015 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2016 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2017 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2018 $886,480 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2019 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2020 $1,508,800 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2021 $754,400 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2022 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2023 $421,552 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2024 $210,776 $510,386 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2025 $2,043,018 $1,258,576
2026 $1,021,509 $629,288
2027
2028
2029
2030
16
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 35 of 58
SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AND PARITY LIENS - Cant'd.
List annual debt service beginning two years before the anticipated Joan agreement dale and continuing at least fifteen fiscal years, Use additional pages as necessary,
IDENTIFY EACH OBLIGATION
1113 SRF Pre-Construction Loan WW59716P #14 SRF Construction Loan WW59717S
Coverage% 120% Coverage% 120%
Insured Yes Insured Yes
FISCAL ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE (PRINCIPAL PLUS INTERESTI t~.;;,~., I
'\'EAR ,SERVICE W /COVERAGE SERVICE W /COVERAGE
#13 #14
2001 $ 9,266,880 $ 3,376,848
2002 $ 9,269,105 $ 4,319,848
2003 $ 10,413,786 $ 4,319,848
2004 $ 9,609,978 $ 4,583,318
2005 $435,473 $ 9,124,400 $ 6,007,338
2006 $435,473 $ 9,109,776 $ 8,070,834
2007 $234,461 $435,473 $ 9,119,410 $ 10,415,683
2008 $468,922 $435,473 $ 9,122,621 $ 10,697,037
2009 $468,922 $435,473 $ 9,111,153 $ 10,697,037
2010 $468,922 $435,473 $ 9,111,615 $ 10,697,037
2011 $468,922 $435,473 $ 8,507,536 $ 10,697,037
2012 $468,922 $435,473 $ 8,511,505 $ 10,697,037
2013 $468,922 $435,473 $ 8,519,661 $ 9,371,289
2014 $468,922 $435,473 $ 8,518,430 $ 9,371,289
2015 $468,922 $435,473 $ 8,505,555 $ 9,371,289
2016 $468,922 $435,473 $ 5,752,461 $ 9,371,289
2017 $468,922 $435,473 $ 2,248,750 $ 9,371,289
2018 $468,922 $435,473 $ 2,248,125 $ 9,371,289
2019 $468,922 $435,473 $ 2,249,375 $ 8,263,189
2020 $468,922 $435,473 $ 2,245,938 $ 8,263,189
2021 $468,922 $435,473 $ 2,237,813 $ 7,320,189
2022 $468,922 $435,473 $ - $ 6,377,189
2023 $468,922 $435,473 $ - $ 6,377,189
2024 $468,922 $435,4 73 $ - $ 6,113,719
2025 $468,922 $ - $ 4,689,699
2026 $468,922 $ - $ 2,626,203
2027 $234,461 $ - $ 281,353
2028 $ - $ -
2029 $ - $ -
2030 $ - $ -
....
17
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 36 of 58
(a.)
(bo)
(co)
(d.)
(eo)
ACTUAL REVENUE AND DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
(Provide information for the two fiscal years preceeding the anticipated date of the SRF Loan Agreement)
FY01 FY02
Water & Sewer Operating Revenue $ 45,934,247 $ 50,143,593
System Development Fees $ 16,696,265 $ 21,751,151
Interest Income $ 10,081,739 $ 7,100,665
Other-Special assesment proceeds $ 1.636.834 $ 1,538.508
Total Revenues $ 74,349,085 $ 80,533,917
Operating Expenses (excluding interest
on debt, depreciation, and other non- $ 27.169.248 $ 31.529.529
cash items)
Net Revenues (g = e - 1) $ 47,179,837 $ 49,004,388
Debt Service excluding SRF Loans $ 9,266,880 $ 9,269,105
(including required coverage)
Revenue (including coverage) pledged $ 3.376.848 $ 4.319.848
to outstanding SRF loans
Total Existing Debt Service $ 12.643.728 $ 13,588,953
Projected SRF Loan Payment $ - $ -
Projected Debt Service on Future $ - $
Projects -
Total Debt Service (Existing and $ 12.643.728 $ 13,588.953
Projected)
Net Revenues After Debt Service $ 34.536.110 $ 35,415.436
Source: Financial Statements-Collier County FY 01, FY 02
Items (h) and (I) from Schedule of Prior and Parity Liens
Notes: (i.e. Rate Increases, Explanations, etc.)
(fo)
(go)
(h.)
(I)
G)
(k)
(I)
(m)
(n)
18
Agenda Item No, 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 37 of 58
PROJECTED REVENUE AND DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
(a.)
(b.)
(c.)
(d.)
(e.)
(Must include at least two years of oroiected SRF Loan Reoavment\
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08
Water & Sewer Operating Revenue $ 61,063,200 $ 64,649,100 $ 66,588,573 $ 68,586,230 $ 70,643,817
System Development Fees $ 24,000,000 $ 21,530,000 $ 22,175,900 $ 22,841,177 $ 23,526,412
Interest Income (flat) $ 7,000,000 $ 7,000,000 $ 7,000,000 $ 7,000,000 $ 7,000,000
Other-Special assesment proceeds $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500.000
Total Revenues $ 93,563,200 $ 94,679,100 $ 97,264,473 $ 99,927,407 $ 102,670,229
Operating Expenses (excluding
interest on debt, depreciation, and $ 41,772,500 $ 46,270,800 $ 47,658,924 $ 49,088,692 $ 50,561 ,352
other non-cash items)
Net Revenues (g = e - t) $ 51,790,700 $ 48,408,300 $ 49,605,549 $ 50,838,715 $ 52,108,877
Revenue (including coverage) p]edgcd $ 9,609,978 $ 9,124,400 $ 9,109,776 $ 9,119,410 $ 9,122,621
to debt service, excluding SRF loans
Revenue (including coverage) pledged $ 4,583,318 $ 6,007,338 $ 8,070,834 $ 10,415,683 $ 10,697,037
to outstanding SRF loans
Total Existing Debt Service $ 14,193.295 $ 15.131.737 $ 17,180.610 $ 19,535.094 $ 19.819,658
Projected SRF Loan Debt Service $ - $ - $ 816,716 $ 816,716 $ 816.716
(including coverage)
Projected Debt Service on Non-SRF $ 4,900,000 $ 4.900.000 $ 4,900.000 $ 4.900.000 $ 4.900,000
Future Projects (including coverage)
Total Debt Service (Existing and $ 19.093.295 $ 20.031.737 $ 22.897.326 $ 25.251.810 $ 25.536.374
Projected)
Net Revenues After All Debt $ 32.697.405 $ 28.376.563 $ 26.708.223 $ 25.586.906 $ 26.572.503
Source:
FY06 thru 07 Projected 3%/yr annual growth from FY 05. Interest income projected from 2002 actuals.
FY04 forecasted actuals; FY05 adopted budget. Items (k) and (I) from Schedule for prior and Parity Liens,
Notes: (i.e. Rate Increases, Explanations, etc,)
I. Reflects 'worst case' CP Loan payment per May 17, 2002 memo to Don Berryhill from Steven Miller.
Assumes no coverage requirement.
(f.)
(g.)
(h.)
(i.)
G.)
(k.)
(I.)
(m.)
(n.)
19
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 38 of 58
CERTIFICATION
I, Director of Operations and Finance for Collier County Utilities,
certify that I have reviewed the information included in the preceding capital financing
plan worksheets, and to the best of my knowledge, this information accurately reflects
the financial capability of Collier County.
I further certify that Collier County has the financial capability to ensure adequate
construction, operation, and maintenance of the system, including these SRF funded
projects.
Signature
Date
20
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 39 of 58
Section 7 - Project Schedule
The following financial and construction project schedules are an approximation of the
major steps to be completed. Some of the steps run concurrently and will be further
developed as the biddable plans and specifications for each project are completed.
7.1 Proposed Financial Schedule
The proposed financial schedule provided below covers financial schedule for all the
projects described in this facilities plan:
Mar 2005
Mar 2005
Apr 2005
May 2005
Jun 2005
Jul2005
Aug 2005
Oct 2007
Hold public meeting on the Facilities Plan and Capital Financing
Plan.
Submit Facilities Plan to FDEP and other agencies for review.
Publication of the Department's environmental information
document in the Florida Administrative Weekly.
End of 60-day comment period for the environmental information
document and approval of planning documents.
Submit request for inclusion of the projects to the FDEP's priority
list.
FDEP hearing to add the project to the Fundable portion of the
SRF priority list.
Sign SRF loan agreement.
Begin SRF loan repayments.
21
Agenda Item No, 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 40 of 58
7.2 Proposed Construction Schedule - Pilot Project
Item Date
Submit Biddable Plans & Specs Apr-05
Obtain permits for jurisdictional wetlands Apr-05
Submit Site Certifications Apr-05
Bid Project May-05
Award Project Aug-05
Begin Construction Sep-05
End Construction Sep-06
Operational testing Aua-07
22
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10,2005
Page 41 of 58
~ndixA - Backup Financiallnfonnation
J\.ngie 'Brewer & .J\.ssociates, L.C.
Estimated SRF Amortization Schedule
Agenda Item No. 8E
Mav 10 2005
\.~"c,.~d:~~,gf 58
.:-r:' (... .~."t,.
\.:>", I . <... '
(~lm_'''m_.i~ Slnx-UJ1iw
~,. EnterValues'- ~
1:"..'-' LoanAmount.~.$_ -. 10,180._".314,0.0..
Annual Interest Rate __..__,~_"I~
Loan Period in Years ~__~~
Number of Payments Per Year 2
'I Start Date of Loan ----4i1i2oo71
Optional Ext~Paymel1!s ~-:----~
Lender Name: [F5EP'-~--------=-~====J
l Loan Summa
- ------Scheduled Payment $-340,298~9
S,,,,,,,... N.mb" of P,,""""! _ ,~
Actual Number of Paymentsl 39
Total Early payment~r-$ 193,80000
Total I nterest I $ 3,279.14991 i
Annualized Payment $ 680,596.78
Annualized Payment including coverage $ 816,716,14
Pmt Payment Beginning Scheduled Extra Total Ending
No. Date Balance Payment Payment Payment Principal Interest Balance
10/1/2007 $ 10,180,314,00 $ .. 340,298,39 $ 193,800,00 $ 534,098,39 $ 381,393,68 $ 152,704,71 $ 9,798,920.32
1
2 4/1/2008 9,798,920,32 340,298,39 - 340,298.39 193,314,59 146,983.80 9,605,605.73
3 10/1/2008 9,605,605,73 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 196,214,31 144,084.09 9,409,391.43
4 4/112009 9,409,391.43 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 199,157.52 141,140.87 9,210,233,91
5 10/112009 9,210,233,91 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 202,144,88 138,153,51 9,008,089,02
6 4/1/2010 9,008,089,02 340,298,39 . 340,298,39 205,177,06 135,121,34 8,802,911.97
7 10/1/2010 8,802,911,97 340,298.39 - 340,298,39 208,254,71 132,043,68 8,594,657,26
8 4/1/2011 8,594,657.26 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 211,378.53 128,919,86 8,383,278,72
9 10/1/2011 8,383,278,72 340,298.39 - 340,298.39 214,549.21 125,749.18 8,168,729.51
10 4/1/2012 8,168,729,51 340,298.39 - 340,298,39 217,767.45 122,530,94 7,950,962,06
11 10/1/2012 7,950,962,06 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 221,033,96 119,264.43 7,729,928,10
12 4/1/2013 7,729,928,10 340,298,39 - 340,298.39 224,349.47 115,948,92 7,505,578,63
13 10/1/2013 7,505,578,63 340,298.39 - 340,298.39 227,714,71 112,583.68 7,277,863,92
14 4/1/2014 7,277,863,92 340,29839 - 340,298,39 231,130.43 109,167,96 7,046,733.49
15 10/1/2014 7,046,733.49 340,298.39 - 340,298,39 234,597,39 105,701,00 6,812,136,10
16 4/1/2015 6,812,136.10 340,298.39 - 340,298.39 238,116,35 102,182.04 6,574,019.75
17 10/1/2015 6,574,019.75 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 241,688,10 98,610,30 6,332,331,66
18 4/1/2016 6,332,331,66 340,298,39 . 340,298,39 245,313.42 94,984,97 6,087,018,24
19 10/1/2016 6,087,018.24 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 248,993,12 91,305,27 5,838,025,12
20 4/1/2017 5,838,025,12 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 252,728.01 87,570.38 5,585,297.11
21 10/1/2017 5,585,297,11 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 256,518.93 83,779.46 5,328,778,17
22 4/1/2018 5,328,778.17 340,298.39 - 340,298,39 260,366,72 79,931.67 5,068,411.45
23 10/1/2018 5,068,411.45 340,298,39 - 340,298.39 264,272,22 76,026,17 4,804,139.23
24 4/1/2019 4,804,139.23 340,298,39 - 340,298.39 268,236.30 72,062,09 4,535,902,93
25 10/1/2019 4,535,902,93 340,298.39 - 340,298,39 272,259,85 68,038,54 4,263,643.08
26 4/1/2020 4,263,643,08 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 276,343,75 63,954,65 3,987,299,34
27 10/1/2020 3,987,299.34 340,298,39 - 340,298.39 280,488,90 59,809.49 3,706,810.44
28 4/1/2021 3,706,810.44 340,298,39 - 340,298.39 284,696,23 55,602,16 3,422,114,20
29 10/1/2021 3,422,114,20 340,298.39 - 340,298,39 288,966.68 51,331.71 3,133,147,52
30 4/1/2022 3,133,147,52 340,298.39 . 340,298,39 293,301,18 46,997,21 2,839,846,34
31 10/1/2022 2,839,846,34 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 297,700,70 42,597,70 2,542,145.65
32 4/1/2023 2,542,145,65 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 302,16621 38,132,18 2,239,979.44
33 10/1/2023 2,239,979.44 340,298.39 - 340,298,39 306,698.70 33,599.69 1,933,280,74
34 4/1/2024 1,933.280.74 340,298.39 - 340,298,39 311,299,18 28,999.21 1,621,981.56
35 10/1/2024 1,621,981,56 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 315,968,67 24,329,72 1,306,012,89
36 4/1/2025 1,306,012,89 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 320,708,20 19,590,19 985,304.70
37 10/1/2025 985,304,70 340,298,39 - 340,298.39 325,518,82 14,779,57 659,785,87
38 4/1/2026 659,785,87 340,298,39 - 340,298,39 330,401,60 9,896,79 329,384.27
39 10/1/2026 . 329 ,3842~ 340,29839 329,384.27 , .- 324,44351 ~,9407E;m.. 0,00
1m I
f---'
Agenda Item No. BE
May 10, 2005
Page 43 of 58
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WATER AND SEWERDISTRICfS
"--..
Senior Obligation Bond Coverage
September 30, 200 1
A computation of debt coverage for the Districts' subordinated debt for fiscal year 2001 is as
fol1ows:~
County
Water :and
Sewer
Operating revenue
~terest income
Gross revenue
S 45,934,247
10,081,739
56,015.986
27,169,248
28.846.738
16,696,265
1,636,834
$ 47,179.837
$ 3,208.190
$ 12,185,089
1,471%
Operating expenses before depreciation and amortization
Net revenue
System development fees
Special assessment proceeds (including interest) (1)
Total amount available for debt service
Subordinated debt service requirement (2)
Total debt service requirement (3)
Bond coverage computation (4)
Bond coverage computation (5)
387%
(1) Proceeds from special assessments levied upon the properties benefited by the projects funded by the
subordinated debt.
(2) Amount of principal and interest due in the current fISCal year for subordinated debt
(3) Amount of principal and interest due in the current fISCal year for both the senior and subordinated debt
(4) Total amount available for debt service. divided by the anDual debt payment. must be greater than 125
percent pursuant to the requirements of the Wastewater Treatment and Stormwater Management
Revolving Loan Fund Agreement
(5) Total amount available for debt service. divided by all additioml debt service requiremenci'; must be
greater than 11 S percent 1b.is includes the revenue bood mpllrements for both the senior and subordinated
County Water and Sewer debt pursuant to the requirements of the Wastewater Treatment and Stonnwater
Management Revolving Loan Fund Agreement.
31
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 44 of 58
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WATER AND SEWER DISTRICTS.
Subordinated Debt Bond Coverage
September 30. 2002
A computation of debt coverage for the Districts' subordinated debt for fiscal year 2002 is as follows:
County
Water aDd
Sewer
Operating revenue
S 50.143.593
Interest income (excluding special assessment interest)
7.100.665
57.244.258
Gross revenue
Operating expenses before deprC(;iation and amortization
Net revenue
31.529.529
25.714.729
System development fees
21,751,151
Bond Coverage computation (4)
1,538.508
$ 49.004,388
S 3.414.068
S 11,745.097
1,435%
417% ·
Special assessment proceeds (including interest) (1)
Total amount available foc debt service
Subordinated debt service requirement (2)
Total debt service requirement (3)
Bond coverage computation (5)
(1) Proceeds from special assessments levied upon the properties benefited by the projects funded by the
subordinated debt
(2) Amount of principal and interest due in the current fiscal year for subordinated debt.
(3) Amount of principal and interest due in the current flSCal year for both the senior an<f subordinated
debt. .~
(4) Total amount available for debt service., divided by the annual debt payment, must be greater that
125% pursuant to the requirements of the Wastewater Treatment and Stormwaler Management
Revolving Loan Fund Agreement.
(5) Total ,amount available foc debt service. divided by all additional debt service requirements. must be
greater than t 15%. This includes the revenue bond requirements for both the senior and subordinated
County Watef and ~wer debt pursuant to the requirements of the Wastewater Treatment and
Stormwater Management Revolving loan Fund Agrec.menL
34
USER INTERFACE - Affordability Calculatiorfgendt~~~o~~o~~
(wei hts income -- 0 3454, sales tax -- 0 0; unemplo ment rate -- 0.2855, ove rate - 0.3 45 of 58
Cou
Number Numll$r
1 ' '".' :.1
2 " pt~14(~jit~.,
"::>,:-,, ;rt~f1-~f\il;>;1',#~Y~
3 fl~
. SY'i!.
4 "21 '''"::.~
5 21:1Il!I~
6 , "2111..~1i
7 . 21 IIl"jr:S
8 ,21 '.0.al
91 " ,,:
10 ,'" ,;
11 i '. '
12, '
13 '
14
15
16 ' ,
17 ."
1821;
19 "
20 ,',
21: ,''11 j w',
22
23 ' '
24
25 ,2111qt ;:8~1l
Summary I
,.
,.,'Y(:
~_2
.
.BI"i
"'''f~
'~;~
-;..,
" ...$
f~
A\:lfl:
'~.fQ"
".iM/2'
'''lI1f
_"Ii
at
Index
Number Population
131 18 6,802
117.43 3,624
129,42 6,255
116 90 7,194
130 26 8,106
168.63 7,383
143.66 2,325
125.33 3,713
13471 5,802
134 86 7,007
146.24 6,926
13386 6,874
12355 3,159
146.46 3,384
118.43 7,028
113.42 6,464
11079 2,541
12418 3,419
121 56 5,713
107,49 3,743
100.45 4,807
10611 4,162
11676 3,834
10996 6,541
117,60 3,529
_~lli~(ji
Index
Number Po ulation
Summary 1
Summary 2
Summary 3
Summary 4
I
I
County # County
1 Alachua ' "
~ ~, '1'71 '
7 Bradford II '
9 - Brevard II ' Ub6lrtV
11 Broward ' II Madi$on ' -
'13 Calhoun ,Manatee, ,
15 Charlotte :Manon--
17 Citrus Mamri':
19 :C~aY 'Mjami~[)ade'
- . 21,Cdllier, 2 Monroe:,'" ',: '
~~'.;, ~~~:a': i:~:~:'
I 29 : Dixie Okeecnobee '
~:; ..:v:.:.... / =:;;;-
35 Flaaler' ,,' ~,s,alm:aeach '
- 37 ~ Frilhldirl. PascO: .
~~.= II. IPi~
43 Glades, -. ,I I PUtnam; ,
-:~ ~t~' " ~~:~:r;:':
49 '" Hardee ,,' 'SijnfitRosa
51 Hendrv ' ~Sarasota ,.,' '"
--:- 53 HernandO, 1"1'7TIseminOJe, ,
55 Hiahlahds " Sumtef' ", .' ,
,- :~> E, i~~ .
63 ~~ JackSon VoJi;lsiiif ' ',' ' :
65 Jefferson';' Waki.dla',
I,., 67 Lafavette.. E wa~ton'.. ,
I ..., .133~ Washiilaron
USER INTERFACE - Affordability Calculatiorfgendt~~~o~~'o~~
weights: income -- 0,3454; sales tax -- 0.0; unemployment rate -- 0,2855; povert rate -- 0.3 46 of 58
Index
Number PODulation
96.98 5,887
109,75 4,213
118,21 7,230
0.00 0
0.00 0
0.00 0
0,00 0
0.00 0
0.00 0
0,00 0
0.00 0
0.00 0
0.00 0
0.00 0
0.00 0
0.00 0
0.00 0
0.00 0
0,00 0
0.00 0
0,00 0
0,00 0
0.00 0
0.00 0
0.00 0
Number
.- ... '. "'iliUt'
1 '. 21 d~HJ,',~
2 . . . 21 JI~lJi~Q2'
3 21 ]1' ~ '~Iqa.sl
4 .
5
6
7
8 .
9 .
10 ,~.'
11
12
13 .
14 '.
15 .~!
16
17' '.
18 '
19
20 ".
21 . ..
22 '....
23 .
24 ,..
25
Summary
w: N''':':~~fii!li~ill,'''~~w,
Index
Number Po ulation
Summary 1
Summary 2
Summary 3
Summary 4
I', ,
1 A1achua.' . 69 . lake.. .'
. 3 Baker . . 71 Lee . .
5 '. Bav,-' : 73' ... Leon ..... .
7 Bradford 'I 75 levy . .' . .
9 . Brevard 77 Liberlv ....
11 Broward 79. Madison
13' Calhoun' . . 81 Manatee '.
.. '15'" Char-Jette . a:f" ; Manorl': .
, ",1 '1179~",:'::: ~!ttusa#" . .. '85. Martin .::'
. , 'I I. \;.I w: ." . ,.;", .86 ,"Miami-Dade
. 2f:"COllier:, .: .8T: Monroe.: '
'..23' . ..COkJmbla 89':., 'Nassau; ".
. . 27. . ',' De Sow:.. 91" .'. 'Okaloosa'., .
. 29. Dixie,- ' 1:. 93' ,..' 'Okeechbbee
3'1 " Duval . 95 'QrariQe: . '.'
. , 33' - EsCambia . 97.' osceola.'.,
35 RacIer: .' 99: 'Palm Beac:h '
37' Franklin' .. 101 'PascO .
39' Gadsden. ,103.. 'Plnellas'
41 ". Gilchrist ' 105' Polk' , .'. .
. 43 .... Glades' .... 10t, Putnam- ,
. .' 45, Gulf, ',1'<' I " 109';" St~'Johos.
'47, Hamilton' .111 St.:t.uoie' '.
49 Hardee~ ,113 santa ~Qsa
51 HendrY'. 11s'5arasota
.' 53 ....Hernando: 117. seminole .
. 55 I1IQHlahds 119',: Sumter; .,. .
57 HiIlsborc;>u Jh' ' 121':;' Sliwannee
59' Holmes"'::J2L.123:'\ ifTavlor .
. 6.1 IhdianRiverTI: 125,:, .Union ,.,'
:: ;:~:~~-- 11 ; ~~~:'~~~~I~a,' ...
.67. Lafavette .131. .;.'Waltbn., .. ,
.... ... 133 Washington.
~ndix B - User CharQe Infonnation
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 47 of 58
Agenda Item No. BE
May 10, 2005
Page 48 of 58
consent. OTders
The District'6 water system is cummt1y operating under a Consent Order iaued by the
Ff)lW (OO-095.ll.HW North ~ Water Treatment Plant Acid Release) (th6 "'Water Consent
Order1. The Consent Order required the submiaaion and approval of a quarterly groundwater-
monitoring plan. The Di$tril;t met the groundwater moni.toriDc reQUiJ:emente of the Water Consent
Order and FDEP has N1eased the District from any further groundwater moltitoring requirements.
1'he only remainiltl l"equitement under the Water Coaaent Qrder is to provide FDIP with an
inventor)' or the trees planted. by the District in June 20011lhowinl the current viability or at teast.
80% of such trees. Such planting i.n .June 2001 was in lieu of the District paying a fine.
The Oi$trict.'s sewer system also is currently operating under a Consent Order issued by
FDEP (nl~2.1l-DW Collier County North Regional FI..0141399) (the "Sewer Consent Order," and
t.ogetMr with the Water Conaent Order, colIl'ld.ively. the "Cons:ent Order"), Several sewage spills at
the North County Water Reclamation Facility in tbe Spline or 2001 prompted FDEP to issue the
Sewer Consent. Order. The Sewer Consent Order was entered on April 10. 2001 alld later amend.d
on July 30. 2002 and March 25. 2003. The Sewer Consent Order. as amended.. requires that U\e
District com.plete the t'oUowi~ improvement5 to the Sy$tem to enhance capacity and reliability, by
the followil'lg dates: (1) conatnJction of the NCWRF flow e<[u.alization tanks (March 31. 2(04), (2)
constru.<:tion or the NCWRF expansion to 24.1 m.cd capacity (September 30. 2005). (3) construction of
the NCWRF expauion to 30.6 tQ.gd capacit,y (January 1. 2()16 or one year prior f.C need of capacity),
(4) c:onstruetitm or t.he Palm Dri:velDavis Boulevard force main (June 30. 20(3). (5) completion of the
Infiltration and Inflow Study for the South Service Area (December 31, 2006>, and ($) conatruet.ion of
the SCWRF expansion to 16 mgd capacity (January 31. 2005). The Sewer Consent Order aoo
requires that two or four .eration baain$ for the NCWRF be ~rved for flow e<1ualiution uses until
construetion of the NCWRF flow equaliution tanka il complete.
The District currently... in Cull compliance with the Con_nt Order. The District fully
intends to maintain its compliance with the Consent Order.
Water Rates and Charges
Water user reu are baaed upon metered water couumption. The current rate struct.ure.
which was updated in February 2003. includes a service availability and a volumetric or commodity
charge for both w.ter and sewer service.. The water rate structure incorpor:ates an inverted block
rat.e mechani&m in the volumetric charge. As water use increa..... the cost per thousand gallons
increases, with the co~ being to enoourap COQMl'Vation. Due to water supply iS8Ues in the
South Florida area, SFWMD has required conservation techniques to be employed. including
conservation rate structures such as the one implelMnted by the Di$t.riet..
A summary 0{ the euaent and future water rate8. as appnwed by the Board. in lte8olution
No, 2003.M. which amended Appendix A to Ordinance No. %001.73. aN as foltows on the neXt page:
(Remainder of pap intentionally left blank)
29
Agenda Item No, BE
May 10, 2005
Page 49 of 58
SUMMARY OF EXISTING AND FUTURE WATER RATES
Meter Siu
518"
314"
I"
1.1I4N
1-112'"
2"
3"
4"
6"
8"
10'"
12"
Block 1.
Block 211
Block 3'
Block 4.
Block 5.
Block 6*
Water Service Availability Charps
lAU CJasses of Cu.tomenr)
Exi....ine
$12.00
12.00
26040
33.60
50040
79.20
146.40
242.40
482.40
770.40
1,394.40
1.883.40
Effective
October 1. 2003
$12.30
12.30
27.10
34.40
51.70
81.20
150.10
248.50
494.50
789.70
1.429.30
1,930.50
Volume Charge Per 1.000 Gallons
(All Classes of Customers)
~ijll'
$1.44
1.80
2.40
3.05
3.65
4.45
Effective
October 1. 2003
$1.48
2.10
2.70
3.40
4.10
".90
Source: Collier Cou.nty Water-Sewer District.
(*) The followinc is the block rate ~:
Meter Size
518"
314"
I.
1-1/.("
1.1/2"
2'"
3"
.."
tr'
lr'
10"
12"
Futum
Effective
October 1. ~
$12.60
12.60
27.80
35.20
53.00
83.20
153.80
25<C.60
506.60
809.00
1,464.20
1,977.60
Future
E<<<<:tive
October 1. 2004
$1.54
2.20
2.90
3.70
4.50
5.50
ConnmDtion Block t'R.......I on number of Gallons) - Un to or Nut
Block 1 Block 2 Block ~ Block 4 B.~ ~ Dl9sL c
5.000
5.000
12.000
20.000
25,000
40,000
80.000
120.000
250.000
450.000
700.000
1,075.000
10,000
10.000
25,000
40.000
50.000
80.000
160,000
250.000
500.000
900,000
1.450.000
2.150.000
20.000
20,000
50.000
80,000
100,000
160,000
320.000
500.000
1,000.000
1,800.000
2,900.000
4,300.000
30,000
30.000
75,000
120,000
150,000
240,000
480.000
800,000
1,500.000
2.700,000
4,300,000
6.450,000
30
50,000 Over 50,11
50,000 Over 50.4'"
120,000 Over 120,1
200,000 Over 20l).'
250.000 Over 2511
400.000 Over 400. J
800.000 Over SOU I
1.200,000 Over 1.2()I
2.500.000 Over 2.f>()l
4.500.000 Over 4.f,()f
1.000.000 Over 7.nu'
11,000.000 Over lUll
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10. 2005
Page 50 of 58
S4lw81' Rates aDd Charges
The current sewer rata iMlud$: (i) a flat or constant service availability or readineu-to..
serve charge which varies by meter aize for all c1aue1ll ofeutome...; (ii) !or individually metered
residential customen of the sewer system. a billing threahold. or 15,000 gallon. pt!lr month per
account; .nd (ill) tor the remainins customer cIaMea of the 88W$l' system. a c:costant volumetric flow
charge based on OM hundred percent (100") of the metered water consumption to such a.a:ount.
A summary of the <:urrent and futU3 Mwer rates, as approved. by the Board in Resolution
No. 2003-94. which amended. Appenm A to Ordinance No. 2001-73. are as follows;
SUMMARY OF EXISTING AND FUTURE SEWER RATES
Sewer Service Availability Charges
(hU ClNIes pC Cus~rs)
Meter Siu
Existine
Effective
Qctober 1. 2003
$18.50
18.50
42..10
5$.90
81.40
128.60
2.88.70
395.90
789.00
1.260.80
2. 26(). 50
3,350.50
518"
$14-
I"
1.U...
1.112"
2"
3"
."
G"
8"
10"
12"
$18.00
18.00
40.95
52...5
79.20
125.10
232.20
385.W
767.10
1.226.70
2.199.40
3.259.90
Volume Charp Per 1.000 Gallons
(All Cl._ of CUlttftm~
All Usapell
~xisti.ae
$2.22
Effective
Qctober 1. 2003
$2.44
Future
Effective
Octo);ter 1. 2004
$19.00
19.00
48.20
55.40
83.60
132.10
245.20
406.60
810.30
1.294.90
2.321.60
3.441.00
Futute<O
Bffective
Ot::.tobar 1. 2004
$2.68
(1) Monthly individually metered raidenU.l u.sage ~ ate capped at 16.000 pUon$.
SoUl"Ce: Collier County Water-Sewer Distriet. -
(Remainder of pap intentiona11yleft. blank)
31
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 51 of 58
ReUM Irrigatioa aatea and Charces
In addition to the water and 8eWer ra'" for DlOntbly lMI'Yice. the District also provides reuse
irrigation water to a variety of UMra. Such ~ indude tingle.family te8ideatial customeR,
c:.ommercial and multitami1y common area.. and golf COUl'1Ie&. The Distriet currently estimates that
approximately 76% of the treated emwtnt trom the District.. eewer treatment facilities is used to
provide irrigation service.
A summary of the reuse irrigation ratea, as apploved by the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners in Ordinance No. 01.73. which amended. Ordinance No. 97-48. are as Collows:
SUMMARY OF EXISTING REUSE IRRIGATION RATES
Reuse Irrintion Rates (effective AD"!!. 2OO2l
(8) Service Availability Cha~:
518 and 31~ inch
1 inch
1 112 inch
2 inch
3 inch
<I inch
6 inch
8 inch
10 inch
12 inch
Monthly User Fee
$ 4.35
10.90
21.75
43.50
81.00
114.00
330.00
600.00
960.00
1.430.00
(b)
Volume Charge Per 4000 Gallcma:
(i) Pressurized and distn'buted
(ii) PreQurized
(ill) Bulk
$0.65
$0.34
$0.26
Rate Comparison
The following table providM CGmparison 0( the rat.ee of other neiPborinc Florida utilities as
or the billing month of April 2003. The montbly billl for the var101,QJ Florida uWi_ used for the
compariaou are exc:lualve 0( local taxa. ~ift.n.ll,., Cor municipally owned utility systema, such
utilities may apply to customers located outside the corporate limits of such munic:ipaJity a surcharge
up to 50% wheD <XImpaNd to the rates for IIerVice to customers located within the corporate limits as
allowed pursuant to Section 180.191. Florida Statur.e.. The 518 x 314 inch meter or smalJer
tomparison was used since it represents the majority of the System's water and 3eWer residential
customers and the majority of the cuslomera tor the other utilitiea reflected. in the comparisons. As
can be Men in the comparisons, the raw cI1arpd by tbe Oiatrid; produce biDs that are competitive
with the bills charged for similar 118rvice by other neilbboriug utilities. Approx.itutAdy 68% of the
standard residential customen (service through a 5f8.i.oeh or 314.inch meter) of the District use
approximately 8,000 gallons or less of monthly water and sewer service. A comparison or water and
sewer rates at. the monthly consumption level of 8,000 galloQ$ (the average Diatrict rellidential user)
between the District and the utilities su~ is shown on the rollowinc page.
(Remainder of pap mtentionll'br left. biaDk)
32
Agenda Item No. BE
May 10, 2005
Page 52 of 58
COMPARISON OF CHARGES FOil MONTHLY UTILITY SBRVlCES
WITH VAlUOUS OTHBlt tmLITIBS
(Bu.ed Oft U.... of 8.100 GaUou)
I{dm: SmD.r 1'$l
QllJier Countv Water-Sew:er District $24.60 $35.16 $60.36
Exi&tiDI Rates
8ffective October 1. 2003 26.00 88.02 64.02
Efl'edive October 1. 20().1 26.90 40.44 67.34
~r Florid. Ut.ili~
City of Boea Raton $12.26 $10.92 $23.18
Bonita Springs Utilitie.a. Inc. 29.23 36.64 65.87
City of Btadenton 25.80 32.33 ".13
Charlotte County 44.10 44.03 88.73
E~ Water District 25.60 40.03 65.63
~'GUA -Golden Gate (Collier Count.,) 48.84 51.14 99.98
FL Water Service$-Lebicb-Lee County 39.70 60.61 90.31
FL Water Services-Ma.rco lsland-Collie'r County 43.78 39.07 82.85
City of Fort Myers 21.59 53.56 81.15
Hillsborouch County 33.95 45.55 19.60
Lee County 27.67 42.87 70.44
Mana.. County 13.76 33.94 47.10
Cu.,. of Naples 12.84 28.2-4 41.01
Gity of North Port 31.96 54.54 86.50
'-nee Count, 14.09 39.32 53.41
..nellas County 20.32 36.04 56.36
City or Punta Gorda 33.41 30.38 63.79
City of' Sarasota 27.26 42.12 69.98
Sarasota County 31.~ 63.98 95.34
Other Florida Utilities. Average $28.63 $40.84 $69.41
SoUl'Olll: Prepared by PubIK Be.ourc:a. Maaapment Group, lae_ the Diatric:t:s Feaaibi1ity Conswtant.
System Development Fees
System Development Fees (g._taUy referred to as impact feH) are irttended to reelWel' from
now Wler.t of the System a portion of the ClD8t8 aHOciated with the expansion of the water and .......
syate... (treatment andt:r'aD8IDiuion tacilitiea). Impact..... are all8U88Cl on the baaia or the
euatomer'. meter aile or~ for some residential appUl:'&tiona. a r.. baed on livinc area square footaca
1'bue fees are paid tor each. nsw conneetion at. the time the building permit ia iaued.
System Development Feea am based upon an equitable and proportionate share of the cost
for: (1) water production and transmission facilities: and (it) sewer transmission, beatment and
em.nt diaposal capacity or the Sy.tem. The pul'pI)IN$ of' the Syaem Developmeat Fees are for
paying or reimbursine the ~uitab1e share of the capiblll costs relatin.g to the eoMtruction. expansion.,
Uf equipping of excess or llnuaed capacity of the Syatem in order to serve new U80ra. If an existing
alStomer requestl an iaereaae in wabllr or sewer capacity due to incmoed developcnent, additional
Sf_m Development Fees will be eoUected prior to the &lvelopment eonaiatent with the net incNue
.(emand.
33
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 53 of 58
Ordinance No. 2001-13, which",.. e.1Ulct.ed by the Board. OIl December 11, 2001 and
lIubMq'Wtntly .upplemented by Reao1ution No. 2003~93 adopted by the Soard on February 25. 2003
(the "Impact Fee Ordinance"'). e....hli.M<l the .District's cu.rrent S)"8tem Development Fees. Such
S,.m Development Fees for an equivalent single family residential connection (ERC) lNrved by the
System punuant to the Impact Fee Ordinance are suaulUuized ... f'ol1owa:
CURRENT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FEES
Other Monda
Utilities Averue
Bate Per ERc<n
Water System Development Fee
Sewet' S}'8tem Development Fee
$2.510
2.950
$1,744
2.078
(I) Derived Crom Impact Fee Ordinance; reflects fee for standard individuaUy.m.etered
residential unit (314 inch meter service which 4tq,l,lates to 1 ERe).
Source: Collier County Water-Sewer District. Florida; Public Resource. Manapment Group, IRe.
~ shown above, the District's currently effecti" $)'8tem Development Fees are higher than
the utility averap reflected. on the c.ompamon. This is a direct result ol (i) the i81lJlediate need to
expand facilitibs with advanced treatment prooeasu (e.g.. revel'$8 osmosis water) which have a
~ cost of construction; (ii) the costa being recwered in the fee$ reflect current capita.! CO$t.$ and
not historical (embedded) eosts. which is the ca.. of eeveral utilities "'t1ec:ted in the CiOmpariaoa; and
(Ui) the District not receiviDg grant Cunds (contributed capital) to f'inADCI the coat& or expauion.
which many comparable ut:i1itiea received ye&1'8 qo when such funda wen nadil7 available.
The amount of System Development FftS eol1ected val')' baee<l tlpOnll'Owth.
Under Florida law, impact fees. sllCb as tbe SyMm Development F.... may only be
expended to eover the CIOSts of expaMion of the system necessary to service new customers. See
"SECURITY FOR THE BONDS--GeneraJ- herein rOC" more imormation relatmc to System
Development Fees..
Pursuant to County ordinance. System Development Fee. may be financed over a ...en yea,
period for exiating structurea required to COJlI\eet the System at an interest rate promulpted by the
Oi8trict'. Board. The current interat rate is 6.0%. The property owner '- nqWnd to pay monthly
installments as a part of'hia water and sewer bill.
Mi~l1.neous Service C.......
The .8o&ld. baa also _pted a .cbeclule of' fees aM charget which ate appUeab1e to
miscellaneous or customer requested servicea wbieb are effective tOr the 8,at.em. The tees ceneraRy
are imposed to recover the c::oa or specifIC ..rvices such u water- and ....r tape. and utility tum-on
fees. The District does not require eustomer deposits since the District has the ability to pJaee a
statutory lien on eacb customer'. property and can discontinue service to the extent or nonpayment.
The District indicates that the level of unc.ollectibles {or providing service is immaterial. 1'hc
following ~ a aummal')' oC the m&sc.lIaneou. service tee. and ehargM that have been aclopUtd by the
District and are currently applicable to the customen of the System.
[Remainder of page intentionaUy left blank)
34
Agenda Item No, 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 54 of 58
~ Alp lumUatioc aM &1"IIi.tz Conm!d CktJ,..
The Board baa adopted. a CMJ for the installation or a water moter as req~ by a cuatomC!ll'
for the initiation or water MtVice. The... zeOect. the eost or a meter iMtaUat.ion aDd the ..rvice
.:onnectioa (i.e.. tlM conaect1on Of' tap to the water main). The installation fees for the District are
,;uDlmarWJd as followa:
M~r Size Ctnchu)
~ 1nstaUation Charge
Without Service LiM
Wta.11ation
$218.00
2<&6.00
449.00
494.00
Actual eoat.
Meter lnstaUation
Charae W'tth
Tap.ln Charee
314"
I"
1-112'"
2"
AU meter sizes above 3"
$562.00
602.00
809.00
851.00
Act.ual Cost
Qtlulr M~lanet)lM Servic, Char-fa
In additicm to the above referenced chargee. the District also bas several other cbatp$ which
Me applic::able to miseeDaneous ot' customer requat.ed services. A summary or other aaieceUaneous
cbargu imposed by the Board [or serricea within the District, that are ClOmDlOD in the utility
I ndustry. include the following:
),fu-llaltteO'Ua F~ .f<< Se~
Amount
Late Payr:nent Chatp
$20.00
$30.00
$30.00
$75.00
$50.00
$30.00
$100.00
$100.00
ktual Time and Material Coet
Plu Av.rqe Conaull1ptia)n CIwp
Plus $800.00 FiDe
$5.00
$1.000.00
$1.00
15% GUhe amount or $100.00
Wbicbever ;. amaUer
5" 01. unpaid ba....nce
Accounts - Chaoce of OwMnhip
",-ofl'.ITurn.on at Owner's Request
,\-(et~r Re-read
Met.erTest.
,\1et.er Lock
~eter Unlock 2nd and Subsequent Even'"
Unlock After Houn
MelerB.emoval
Illegal Connection
Credit Card Handling Charge
Temporary M.eler Depoait
Ouplicate Bill Proc:eqing Fee
Non-Suff'x:1ent Funds (NSF) PI.'OCe8lring Charp
(Remainder or pap intentionally left blank)
16
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 55 of 58
Water Akfer lutaltaUtnt. tJIId &rviu CoI'lMCt CJuJr.,a
The Board baa adopted a fee Cor the iutallation or a water meter... requeated by a (:ustomer
for ..he initiation oC water lervic:e. The feea refJect the eoat of a meter imstallation aDd the eerviee
,,-onnoction (i.e., the connection or tap to the water main). Tbe iostaUation feea for the District are
tlutomarized as !oUoW'B:
M~ter Size (~
314ft
I"
1.112"
2"
All meter aizes above :r
Meter Installation Charge
Without Service Line
Inatalla tion
Meter lnatallation
Cbarp With
TaD-In Cbaree
$218.00
246.00
449.00
494.00
Actual Con
$562.00
602.00
809.00
851.00
Actual C4..t
Ot.h.rrM~ ~ Chartlq
In addition to the above referenced <:harges. the District. a1lo has several other ~ which
:.re applicable to mise&l1aMOus or customer requested 8ervice.. A summary of other miscellaneous
tharp. imposed by the Board for lIervk:ee within the District" that are COII1motl in the utility
Industry, include the following:
MilcelJaMOWt Fees for Services
Amount
Aa:ounts - Change or Ownership
-ofiI"l'urn-on at Owner's ReqlleBt
;\'l....er Re.read
Meter Test
MoterLodr;
Meter Unlock 2nd and Subsequent Events
Unlock Altor Kouns
Meter Removal
1llep1 O:mnection
$20.00
$30.00
$30.00
$75.00
$50.00
$30.00
'$100.00
$100.00
.Actual Time and Material Cost
PlUl Average CoMumption Cha.
Plus $300.00 Fine
$5.00
$1.000.00
$1.00
15% of the Amount or $100.00
Whi.chever ia ....1'
5" of unpaid balance
Credit. Card Handling Charp
1'(tmporary Meter Deposit
Duplicate Bill Pl'OCe.&$ing Fee:
Non..su.fl'icient Funds (NSF) p~ Cha.ree
Late Payment Charge
[Remainder of page intentionally Wt blank)
S5
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 56 of 58
~ndix C - Public Participation Documen1s
Agenda Item No. BE
May 10, 2005
Page 57 of 58
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY AQUIFER STORAGE AND
RECOVERY FACILITIES PLAN, DATED MARCH 2005; AUTHORIZING THE PLAN TO
BE SUBMITTED TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AND TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY TO AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUALS.
WHEREAS, Collier County has determined that the Reclaimed Water Aquifer
Storage & Recovery project recommended in the Collier County Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Facilities Plan should be implemented; and
WHEREAS, staff has requested that the Board of Collier County Commissioners
approve the Collier County Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facilities Plan and Capital
Financing Plan in accordance with State Revolving Fund (SRF) requirements; and
WHEREAS, The County is seeking funding from the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) under its SRF loan program to fund these
improvements to benefit Collier County's Water/Sewer customers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE EX-QFFICIO THE
GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT, that:
1. Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby adopts the Collier
County Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project Facilities Plan (copy attached and
incorporated herein).
2. The Collier County Dedicated Revenue and Capital Financing Plan, having been
delivered to each Board Member for their individual review, is hereby adopted.
3. The Board of County Commissioners hereby authorizes submission of this Plan to the
State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
4. The Collier County Public Utilities Division Administrator is hereby authorized to carry
out the responsibilities under this Loan Program and to delegate authority and
responsibility to staff to carry out all activities to accomplish the goals of the Loan
Program, provided such actions by staff do not make any additional commitments on
the County's behalf without further approval from this Board.
5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
in favor of adoption.
day of
, 2005 after majority vote
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS
EX-oFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD
OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -
SEWER DISTRICT
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BY
Deputy Clerk
BY
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
J~^ ~k----
Thomas C: Palmer,
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 8E
May 10, 2005
Page 58 of 58
CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
(N/A for 319 or 320 funded projects)
Project Sponsor: Collier County
SRF Project Number: WW59716P
Project Description: Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facilities Plan
I do hereby certify to the following:
Collier County held a public meeting on (date) to provide the public with
an opportunity to participate in the planning of the subject project. The meeting was
advertised in accordance with local requirements for public notification.
The following items were addressed during the public meeting:
. Project Descriptions
. Project Costs and the Impact on User Charges
. Evaluation of Project Alternatives
The proposed projects will have the following impact on user charges: This proiect is
not expected to impact user charaes.
Certification Completed By:
Rov B. Anderson. P.E.
Signature Printed Name
Director, Public Utilities Enaineerina Division
Title Date
Note: An authorized representative of the project sponsor or the consulting engineers
may complete this certification.
Revised: 4/25/01
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 9A
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 8
APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO THE UTILITY AUTHORITY
OBJECTIVE: To re-appoint 1 member to serve a 4-year term, expiring on May 21,2009, to the
Utility Authority.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier County Utility Authority has 1 term expiring on May 21,
2005. This 5-member council was established on February 27, 1996, by Ordinance No. 96-6 to
regulate utility rates and related matters regarding non-exempt water and wastewater utilities in
unincorporated Collier County. Three members shall be technical in nature, with expertise in
engineering, finance and/or business administration. The remaining 2 members shall be
appointed on the basis of individual civic pride, integrity, and experience in any area of
regulation. Members are required to file a Form 1 Statement of Financial Interests each year
with the Supervisor of Elections. After initial staggered terms, the terms will be 4 years. A list
of the current membership is included in the backup.
The term for Mr. Lowell Lam will expire on May 21,2005. A press release was issued on
March 7, 2005 with a deadline of March 25, 2005. One resume was received from the following
interested citizen:
APPLICANT
CATEGORY
DIST ELECTOR ADV. COMM.
Lay Person -Civic Pride
Utility Authority
,......---
COMMfITEE RECOMMENDATION: Quasi-Judicial- no recommendation
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment, appoint 1 member, and direct the County Attorney to prepare
a resolution confirming the appointment.
Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
Agenda Date: MAY 10,2005
....jlllI-.
Agenda Item No. 9A
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 8
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
9A
Appointment of member to the Utility Authority.
5/10/2005 9 0000 AM
Prepared By
Date
Sue Filson
Executive Manager to the BCC
4/22/20053:31:38 PM
Board of County
Commissioners
BCC Office
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4/27/20054:10 PM
Agenda Item No. 9A
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 8
(i) Memorandum
To: Sue Fllaon, executive Manager, &oerd of County Commissioners
cc: Joseph K Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development and
Environmental Servlc.. DIvision
From: D. E. "Bleu" Wallace, Director
Date: March 28, 2005
Subject: Collier County Water & WaatlJwatBr Authority Vacancy
I have reviewed the request of the applicant seekiDl re-appoiatmeat to the Collier County
Water & Wastewater Authority upon the expiration of the existing term.
The Authority consists of five members; three technical members and two lay members, with
regulatory oversight ofwater/sewer rates, tenitorial boundaries, customer service inquiries, and
quality of service standards regarding investor-owned utilities operating in Collier County, which
include Orange Tree Utilities, North Marco Utility, Goodland Isles, Inc., Ave Maria Utilities
Company, and limited oversight of the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (Golden Gate).
Dere is ODe (1) lay-member vaeaDe)' OD the Authority.
Mr. Lowell Lam, 5 Grey WiD. Point (Eagle Creek), Naples, Florida 34113_ Mr. Lam is
completing the unexpired term of a previous lay-member and is highly qualified for
reappointment. Mr. Lam bas a business admini~ion background and extensive experience in
utility regulation matters. As a Jay-member, Mr. Lam serves on the basis of civic pride and
integrity. Mr. Lam has an excellent attendance record and is an Authority member in good
standing.
While qualifications are capsulated above, no staff recommendation is contained herein.
Operations Department
Community Development & Environmental Services Division
Agenda Item No. 9A
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 8
,-
Utility Authority
NtI1IIe Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Dtde Ter",
HOlM PIIOM DtlteRC'J-llpf1t 2rldExpDate 2"d Term
Mr. Robert C. Bennett 07/16196 O5fl1198 2 Years
7065 Dennis Circle 103 352-0219 06111/02 05121106 4 Years
Naples, FL 34104
E-Mail:
District: 3
Category: Technical-Executive Management
Dr. Fay R. Biles 05112198 05121/99 1.5 Years
1588 Heights Court 394-3089 04/22/03 OS/21/07 4 Years
Marco Island, FL 34145
E-Mail:
District: 1
Category: Lay Member
Mr. Lowell Lam 07130/02 05fll/05 3 years /
5 Gray Wing Pt. n4-5464
Naples, FL 34113
E-Mail:
District: 1
Category: Civic Pride
Mr. W J. "Jack" Markel 07/30/02 05121/03 1 Year
334 Henderson Ct. 389-8997 04/22/03 OS/21/07 4 Years
Marco Island, FL 34145
E-Mail:
District: 1
Category: Technical
Mr. Jerry P. Morgan 07130/02 OS/21/04 2 Years
7350 Mont Claire Drive, #201 594-8204 05/11/04 OS/21/08 4 Years
Naples, FL 34109
E-Mail:
District: 2
Category: Technical
Wetbrt!SdIly, May 12, 2004
Pagel oIl
Agenda Item No. 9A
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 8
~
Utility Authority
Name
Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDtlte 2nd Term
This 5 member authority _ 8IIt8bIi8hed an Febn.ay 27, 1996. by 0rdI_1Ce No. 98-8 to
regulate utility ..... and AII8Ied m...... NgBrding non-exMlpt waIer _ 1Il_~" utilities in
unincorporated Collier Colmy. Three members ....1 be technicall" I'1IIIunt, with expertlee in
engineering. fii8ac;e ~or buIiness admilWb.A..l. The nnairing 2 members 8haII be
appointed on the ... d incividu81 civic pride. integrity. and experience in .. __ d
regulation. Members are AlqUiAMt to fie a Form 1 Slatement of Firvn:i8l111tIereD eech year
with the Supervlaor of EJections. Tenns are .. yeers.
,-. FL STAT 125.01(t)
Staff: BIeu Wallace, CDES Operations Director: 659-5117
Wetlnathry, May 12, 2()(u
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item No. 9A
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 8
MEMORANDUM
RECEIVED
MAR 3 0 2005
D~TE: ~ch28,2005
80lIrd of County CCllMllaelonenl
TO: Elections Office
""
FROM:
RE: Voter Registration . ~dvisory Board ~ppointments
The Board of County Commissioners will soon comider the following individuals for appointment
to one oftbe county's advisory committees. Please let me know iftbose listed below are
registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides.
UTILITY AUTHORITY
COMMISSION DISTRICT
Lowell Lam
5 Grey Wmg Pt.
Naples, FL 34113
/
Thank you for your help.
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 9A
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 8
DATE:
March 28, 2005
Bleu Wallace, CDES Operatio~. or
Sue Filson, Executive Manager I
Board of County Commissio ..
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Utility Authority
As you know, we currently have a vacancy on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press
release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for
consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
Lowell Lam
5 Grey Wmg Pt.
Naples, FL 34113
Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment of tile advisory coDDDittee
within the 41 day time-fi'ame, and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration.
Please eategorize tile .pplleaaa ia areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at
774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
-
e
~<-
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
N~~~,:; ~~CE'VED
Fax: (239) 774-3602 2005
MAR21
Agenda ~~A
May -1<l, 2005
Page 8 of 8
Board of CoI.IrtY CommIsIiOII8III
Name:
Application for Advisory CommitteeslBoards
}.o ue. /1 L.arn Home Pholle: ..23'7 - 77'fSY'6 <f
0- 6-uYy U/J~~ f?; Zip Code: 3 '1--/1 3
e-maUaddreu: LIn LAn (tii) (~7: ~ Alet:
Home Address:
FuNo. 770- olf30
Busiaess Phoae:
Place of Employeement: ~ 17 r;,:J
Board or Committee Applied for: U TJ h t'tf
Category (if applicable):
En..ple: Co..mUaIo. Dlstrlet, Developer. e.vlro..e."'IIt, lay peno.. ete.
A, lA/H./tt,
How long bave Y08 lived in Collier CO.Dty: Yean /f Months
Are you a registered voter ia Collier Coaaty: Yes V No
e
Do you currently hold publie oflice? Yes
tho, wllat is thllt oIIice!
No
;/""
Have you ever beeD convicted of aay offense against tile Law?
If yes, e:lpbdD:
No ~
Yes
Do you IIOW serve. or luwe )'011 ever served, 011 . Collier Ct..nty _nI or CGID8Iittee! Yes V No
If yes, please list the co.lBiUeesIboenll: tJ T I I,'"t.t .JJr, Th pr i ty .;z. 7' ~ n77 S
(~ StS!/'v)'n~ O>? /,J,/S;
~-.,.d.
Please list yoar com....ity activities (civic clubs, Deigbborlaood associatlollS, etc. aad posltloas
held: c.a9J- 0--.1- ("'Co.
Ed~;~:.:,__. L ;f,T'';/:::;f:' !~.7i:' ~~~9'~'~
Experience: '67 Cj'/'s - &vk.., 4-.c_ .L.z:.'t.;:2.0.y r.f ~ JI. /'.
S~/es - ~ 'T~ ~ - //.I!9k ~Z-~.s
#/hz ~_d //!?/7 ~.d~ Z .e~r;'/I!!/P'n~ U/.7~ 7h/~ j,p.;9~d
Plea, tdItIcll /flf] UMDllII1 i"I_1IIiDII :lIIIIIHI pnfillt!1tI. T1Ib IIpJ1IkIdUM MoM k latwlUtletllfl Sill! ,.,,.,,,,, M"""6#!
lire BtHUtI alCaflllly Ctllfflfl.....ers, 33.J EIUf T-u-I TI'fIlI, NtIpIa, FL 341 J 1. 1/:1.. "''''', pleat! Ita 1""" ~ to
(139)774-36111 ar _1IiI to .lIeIibtntliiieolJMln".,.-. TII..... ytIIIftll''--''6 to unt! tilt! cltlwu alC"" C_ty.
Agenda Item No. 9B
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 26
EXECUTIVESU~ARY
APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY
COMMlTIEE
OBJECTIVE: To appoint 2 members representing Collier County, 1 member representing the
City of Naples and I member representing Marco Island to the Collier County Coastal Advisory
Committee.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee has 1 vacancy due
to a resignation and 3 terms expiring on May 22, 2005. This 9 member committee was created
by Ordinance 2001-03 to assist the Board of County Commissioners with its establishment of
unified beach erosion control and inlet management programs within the unincorporated and
incorporated areas of Collier County, and to advise the Board of County Commissioners and the
Tourist Development Council (TOe) of project priorities with respect to funding sources that are
available to Collier County for restoration and protection of its shoreline. The committee is
composed of 3 members from the unincorporated area of Collier County, 3 members from the
City of Naples and 3 members from the City of Marco Island. Selection for membership on this
committee will be based upon the applicant's familiarity with coastal processes, inlet dynamics,
coastal management programs, or demonstrated interest in such programs; relevant education
and experience; leadership and involvement in community affairs; and willingness to attend
meetings and to undertake and complete assignments. After initial appointments, terms will be 4
years. A list of the current membership is included in the backup.
The tenns for Anthony P. Pires, Jr., James L. Snediker, and Councilman John F. Sorey, 1II will
expire on May 22,2005. We also have a vacancy due to a resignation with the term expiring on
May 22,2007. A press release was issued and resumes were received from the following 3
interested citizens:
APPLICANT
CA TEGORY
~ ELECTOR ADV. COMM.
CURRENTL Y SERVING ON
Gerald W. Camiener Ph.D. in Biology & Chemistry 2 Yes None
Thomas W. Sansbury Resides in City of Naples 4 Yes None
Anthony P. Pires, Jr. Land Use Attorney 2 Yes Land Acquisition Committee
Coastal Advisory Committee
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Gerald W. Camiener, term expiring 5/22/07
Anthony P. Pires, Jr., term expiring 5/22/09
CONFIRMATION OF MEMBERS:
Councilman John F. Sorey, 1II, representing the City of Naples, term expiring on 5/22109
Ronald J. Minarcini, representing the City of Marco Island, term expiring on 5/22/09
--
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 26
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment, appoint 2 members, confirm 2 members, and direct the
County Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the appointments.
Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
Agenda Date: MAY 10, 2005
,-
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 26
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
98
Meeting Date
Appointment of members to the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee.
5/10/2005900:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Sue Filson
Executive Manager to the BCC
4/22/20053:31:38 PM
Board of County
Commissioners
BCC Office
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4/27/20054:48 PM
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 26
Memorandum
To:
Sue Filson, Executive Manager, Board of County Commissioners
From:
Maria Bernal, Tourist Tax Coordinator, Tourism Department
Date:
April 14, 2005
Subject:
COASTAL ADVISORY RECO....ENDATION FOR VACANCIES
On April 14, 2005 the Coastal Advisory Committee reviewed the two applications received by
the prescribed deadline for one vacancy. Applicants were evaluated based on their potential
contributions to the Committee. The Committee found only one applicant to be qualified since
the other applicant resides within the City of Naples limits.
The Coastal Advisory Committee also recommended that Mr. Anthony Pires be reappointed.
Please advise should you need additional information.
Copies to:
Jack Wert, Director
Gary McAlpin, Senior Project Manager
Chairman Pennington
Agenda Item No. 9B
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 26
tn
W
~
t-
e(
t-
Z
W
_tn
OW
e(0::
00.
-WID
wO::o
Weco
t-wN
t:0::C'i
2e(N
:Ie>
Owe(
0....2
~~~
00-
tno.!;
-0::0.
>0><
Cow
e(zt-
..J-e(
e(zw
....:)tn
tno::
e(o
Ou.
Otn
....
Z
e(
o
::i
0.
0.
e(
"
C
v
S ..
i v
>
u
v
ac:
.:I
v C
u v
:lCS rl
v · v
vS.. >
:IE"-
.. ;
Ov
ac:
....
· 0 ..
v_
"u v
- v >
.. -
~w
~ t' t'
~ I t- .1 .. t-
" v .. u .1
. . . " ~ ", CI.. -a
III .!!~ ~ ~ v....
t- !~" .Ill
S .", i :;l H "
i 0 _0. ~
; := .. e u". P- ..
.. ,: I to:) · . .
~ " v I " ! :;l _ ~.J t' ~t =
. u U ~ tl i ~
. .';:l t .Iii e; e
III _ u ~ . :IE 0.. .
e ... e iii .2 ~ Sui,.... .. '" ,.... III
Oc. .... I i,.... i ~= 0
.. ",- 0 -;; - i..w! u
.lIII "e,:! U,.... "$ . I =~ lC1: ..
u v u:!c'" ..
. .. c: . tii CI" I s.. -I~ =-
~-E . .. u 1'0 > .A .- I GO
= I ~ Cl 0'"
- I _u.~ f":' i.... ua
~E! C5 .. ", i ;: =)t-... ,:1: v-
I~ Uo.. . u-- C":'
1: : -el . ..- = CI
I I . v,.... - · 1: .-
';:l · 0 ..i ~ Cli o..-.!! w- ..o.!! s~
; Jill ~ ~Io..l ~'E .sU...
.. .. .!N ~N ~"';' liii~ iii I . . .... !:.
" c.ii s- I v c_ =-i .0.
w ..v.. v ~ = ~ o U ;_ 0= .!!IV is g
I o v
.1- ::Eli u:: ~E =- u t-uj Ut' "'Ee ... -
utI .- ~ :. 0-
.2 'E I ..- tlr :!~ .
.!! I .IS :1'2 " -
- i-v =iaCl" a I . .. ~
. .v_ I i = s - s I i :=
u .. ... . o 0 "5 0 =. C5 .Cl" 15" ! ::
!5 0..-3:: =u uu uu ::= u~::E~ U~ uu::E =~
..
III
Q . . . . . . . . .
.
_ 0 ....
.- v
::1i .
..
.. c. !
III III
u~ ~
0
..
.B u
..
. v i:
:s! S !
" .
:=z .Ill
u -
.
~
i
1--
0:
w
m
::IE
w
::E
1fi~
>z
-0
~-
c(~
~c(
Zz
we!)
-tI)i,i
OWw
c(0:0:
00. t
-WOt
WO:~u
Wc(WfIl
~W::)~
!::o:OCi
::Ec(IOE
::IOOE
OWoQ
O~N~
>~C"i'J:l
0:0>5
OD..O:~
U)o:c(il
>0::).
000:=
c(zmi
..J-w.2
c(z~-
~::)z:!
U)0::0-8
c(owCS
OlL..JJ:l
oU)m.2
~c(~
z:::!s
c(c(ii
0>=
:Jc(0'
D..~
~:i
U)
~
z
c(
o
~
":t::l ..
J:l Q
u_
"Cl <I
- U
"'-
~I&l
.... l5
J:l0-
t';i
.. &:l.
:::I =
U ~
o
"Cl
J:l
V
E
E!
Q
<I
U
&:II:
:2
v c:l
<I V
i :; E '"
V J:l U U
....:a.::...
,e;..;
o v
IlC
~
· III .
:s!E~t
1."ClJ:l
.il:_.!
U ~E!
u .
cu
...
III
...
...
v
...
~
..: ~
~ ell
.c ::
~ :
'0
J:l
.c
u
i? u
-;; t
.. Q
: ~
-= :::I
;:l ;
.s ;;
. -
.... ..
fIl ::
III v
J:l ..
>. :::I
. .c
~ ~
...
...
.
~
Q
.a
""
a:i
.c
.
"Cl
v
...
~
III
QIl
.Ii
u
..
.
v
::
..
1 8
:.=
.!! a
.a .
u-
. .
~::iC
~il
-;; .
.. .
:~
--
III .
;;l~
.
u
u
J:l
v
1:_
v. C
a- u =
ui >. U
.c v c:l
u u . "Cl
... . &:l. J:l
= ! e.
v . u
~ if ii
:! J:l ~
_og :::I
.!e 'ii: t
.2 ;;l ·
= v El
"Cl .c :i
:=~ .c
_"Cl ""
:!:=: z
i::f ~
.!i!C ~
ul:>. ....
u v J:l =
01 ;. a. _"Cl
vii ..
:a=~ U
u ~ u l:l':
.
. ..
.
rJ
J:l
-
Q
E
Ii
<
I
o
(oil
U
"Cl
J:l .
."Cl
....
J:l..J
. .
Ii.c
.!: ~
.-
.c.2
u=
Q
il:
Q
z;
::
...
v
....
!
v
.-. ii
5 t
v "Cl
>. J:l
e, ·
....
J:l
v
Ii
&:l.
Q
i
v
Q
'"
~
.
o
>.
v
...
C
...
Q
-
III
U
"Cl
-;;
v
..
""
....
J:l
v
a
Do
Q
i
v
"Cl
Ii
.!e
....
u
=
...
....
..
c:l
Q
u
.!!
l: t'
.....
:.;
1t)"Cl
l'O).!!
. .
....
... .
~ v
· Ii .
o &:l. e-
>..2 Q
t:U
C"
Q
~t'
. :::I
Ii'c
Q '"
.c J:l
~~
III
..
=
....
u
v
....
:a
~
<
'S
v ~
~ 1!
'0 :
u ii
~ ;:J
1: <of
Q ~
;:; :=
... ~
Q <
~ .
-e ~
: Q
a E
;:J ·
<
=
:t:
.
fIl
=
. .
.
"Cl
1:
Q
EO: c:l
If .2
v ....
il ~
1 v
~ !
'0 ~
~ !
:= i
t
U
'"
l5
:: U
-a. U
. .c
z; ~
I:
Q
....
j
...
Q
'E
.
Q
=
!
<
. . .
.
"Cl
1:
Q
;:;
U
.c
~
J:l
.2
~ ..
i i
fIl :=
l5 :
,c .2
= ....
i E
< w
..
a
o
U
ii
.
Q
~
.
c:l
III
.c
~
. .
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 26
ii
....
'"
.
Q
U
.a
1:
Q
;:;:5
'S]
~ Ii
~ Ii
fIlO
J:lU
. ..
Ii a
....2
- ....
. .
~l.
"ClU
=&:11:
.-
...!!
.x:
Ii Ii
U J:l
:t: f
--s:
:I a
""(oil
.
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 26
-- Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee
Work PIrone Appt'd Up. DtIte Term
NtllIIe Home PIrone ~ 2Iu1ExpDtIIe 2nd Term
/
Mr. Anthony P. Pires, Jr. OS/22JO I OS/22/0S 4 Years
649-6555
209 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
E-Mail:
District: 2
CoJegory: Collier County
Ms. Heidemarie Kulpa 566-8389 09/21/04 OS/22/07 3 Years
766 Wiggins Bay Drive 566-8389
Naples, FL 34110
E-Mail:
District: 2
Category: Collier County
Mr. G_ Ginsberg r,.~~ 455-6595 03/09/04 OS/22107 3 Years
4950 Sycamore Drive -fe "!1 455-6595
- ....--~ Naples, FL 34119 ,..
E-Mail:
District: 3
Category: Collier County
Mr. James L. Snediker OS/22/01 OS/22/05 4 Years /'
3000-417 Royal Marco Way 642-3566
Marco Island, FL 34145
E-Mail:
District: 1
Category: Marco Island
Mr. John A. Arceri 394-8852 02/11/03 OS/22/07 3+ Years
1228 Lamplighter Court 394-8852 01/27/04 OS/22107
Marco Island, FL 3414S
E-Mail:
District: 1
Category: Marco Island
Wednesday. September 29. 2(J04
Page 1 0/3
Agenda Item No. 9B
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 26
-.. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee
Name Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term
Mr. Paul W. Sullivan 06/08/04 OS/22/08 4 Years
1330 Caxambas Ct. 393-9125
Marco Island, FL 34145
E-Mail:
District: 1
Category: Marco Island
Mr. Murray H. Hendel 05/11/04 OS/22/08 4 Years
4301 Gulf Shore Blvd., N. 262-0738
Naples, FL 34103
E-Mail: murrp2h@aol.com
District: 4
Category: City of Naples
Mr. Ronald M. Pennington OS/22/01 OS/22/03 2 Years
3430 Gulf Shore Blvd., N., Unit 2F ~935 02110/04 OS/22107 4 Years
Naples, FL 34103
E-Mail:
District: 4
Category: City of Naples
Councilman John F. Sorey, III 213-1015 03/09/04 OS/22/05 1 Year V
735 Eighth Street. South
Naples, FL 34102
E-Mail:
District: 4
Category: City of Naples
Wedm!sday, Septembe 29, 2IHU
Page20fJ
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 26
Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee
Name
Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDaJe 2nd Term
This 9 member committee was created on February 13, 2001 by 0rdir&1ce 2001-0310 assist
the ao.d of County Commielioners with its ~1I.ent cA unified beech eroeion control and
inlet management programs within the unincorporated and incorporated _ of Collier County,
and to advise the Bc&d d County Commislionens and the Tourist Development Council (TDC)
of project priorities wiIh reBP8Cl to funclng souroes that.. av8il8ble 10 Collier County for
restoration and pmtection d its 8horeIine. The committee is composed of 3 members from the
unincorporated __ d Collier County, 3 members from the City d N8pIes 8'KI 3 menbers from
the City d Marco 18Iand. Selection for membership on this committee will be b8IIed upon the
applicant's fWnilBtty with CCI8BIaI pI'OCs IISI, inlet dyrBnics, CCI8BIaI management progrwns. or
demonstrated interest in such programS; reaeva1t education and expeIiellCe; IeBdeIship and
involvement in comm&.R1ity affairs; and willingnSl1 10 aItend meetings and to undertlIIke and
complete assignments.. AfIBr initial appoinlmenls, tenns will be 4 yeIn.
--~. .
FL STAT
Stoff: Maria Bernal, Tourism Office: 213-2966
Clf~1 of ^(al/~s - ';l.I3- IOIS
f'/1Ar~o Is /and- 389-s~
Wednesdtq, Septfl1lfber 29. 21NJ4
Pagd Df 3
fllson s
-
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 26
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
jrosenberg@naplesgoY.com
Thursday, April 14, 2005 4:02 PM
filso"_s
Coastal Advisory Committee
Dear Ms. Filson,
Council endorsed Council Member Sorey again - I am just waiting for
the signed resolution which I will forward to you.
Thanks,
Jessica
Naples Deputy City Clerk
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus}
1
:.
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 26
City of Marco Island
April 6, 2005
RECEIVED
APR 0 7 2005
Board of County Commtssi0ner8
Ms. Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112-4977
Re: Recommended Appointment to Coastal Advisory Committee
Dear Ms. Filson:
By your e-mail of February 28, 2005 you advised that the term of James L.
Snediker on the Coastal Advisory Committee will expire on May 22, 2005. Mr.
Snediker is a resident of Marco Island and was recommended to the Board of
Commissioners by the Marco Island City Council.
City Council has considered candidates for the seat that will become available in
May. By unanimous vote the Marco Island City Council recommended that Mr.
Ronald J. Minarcini be appointed to the Coastal Advisory Committee. Mr.
Minarcini's resume is attached.
Please advise should you need any additional information in order to convey our
City Council's recommended candidate to the Collier County Board of
Commissioners.
Sincerely,
AN~
A. William Moss
City Manager
AWM/bal
Enclosure(s)
cc: City Council
Mr. Ronald J., Minarcini
50 Balcl Eagle Drive, Marco Islancl, Florida. 34145
(239) 389-5000 FAX (239) 389-4359
www.cityofmarcoisland.coIn
Application for Advisory Committees/Boards
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 26
~ County
;a.#~
Board of Coanty Commissioners
JJOl East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239) 774-8097
Fax: (239) 774-3602
board or committee!
0Dd~ eta:. ad ....):
Education:
~Tll.
PI_ dlJd fIllY ___III iII/MrI--:/OII f<<l pmliIGtL Db "",.r:IIIIM -..u N.t-eNel.. s.e nm.. ~ .ilIUMpI' III tII~
&.n o/C--., C~..,..Mn, 33'1 Eat T.....' TrIII4 N.-, FL 141 I:l. If:fM.... Jll-fra:l- .",U~ III (23')"4-3681 fI'...
",811 tD ."efiJsonliiJt:DllUJn."".1UII. n...t ~fttr -"I .io,. .. _* ~ tlfc.llMr c.r.q.
.~ .
Printed by: Bill Moss
Title: re: Ron Mlnarcinl : VirtualTownHall
Agenda Item No. 98
M~:iJO, 2005
Monday, March 28, 200f'~:m ~6
Page 1 of 1
Monday, March 28, 20054:43:17 AM
Message
From: Sailenya@aol.com
Subject: re: Ron Minarcini
To: bmoss@cityof marcoisland.com
Bce: Bill Moss
Attachments: AttachO.htm!
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Now that my wife and I have chosen to make Marco Island our full-time residence, I would like to
have the Board consider me for a position on the Collier County Beach Advisory Committee.
I believe that my experience would be helpful to the Committee and allow me to contribute in the
resolution of the issues that pertain to the care and protection of our vital beaches.
Sincerely,
Ronald J. Minarcini
,s
(
\
NAMF..:
EDUCATION;
PllOFESSIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS:
SUMMARY;
1"1 . Pre$eat
Dai- 1991
RESUME
Agenda Item No. 9B
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 26
RaaaId J. Miaarc:UU
"") ~ " , -
<4<- !-';:...:;:.
..,., i "
a.s. - Ch1l ~ .Ka..... State U~, 1960
M.s. . avO. .ED......" Ka... State u~, 1961
.Ameriaal Soc::ietyol Ciril ~rs
s..ae of Florida, Liceased CoaInICIOr'
~ PrafasMHW ~ - Kaas.s
1b1rty )'elIJ'I 'Ill experitDce In aemtiYe ......1Iiloo.d, project
-,~ aIIId -rumog .. ..."., .....-IDe, .Dd IBduf.adal
~ pndec:U .. do 1k .... .............. -t4oea.
KIEWIT CONSTRucnON GkOUP, INC.
DivisiDn Man.~. Omaha. Nebntsb Responsible .for the
lIDdcrgrOUDd operations. the OYcnCciDg of the company's mterestl!l on
the Great Belt Tunnel Project in Denmark, and the company's
inlerest in . MalIS Electric Consttuaion Company.
Member of the Cmlanrnon&: MiniQr Groun Board of Dire.c:tDn.
DlU..INGBAM CONSTK.UCTlON CORPORATION
Director. Senior Vice PrewiMnt an~ ~~~1reI' ~of. ~
Ccmaroction NA_ me. and ~ --L- -.:...._ _ ~_
Connructinn Clnada Lta. Respouible for the 0\Icral1 directiOll aDd
management of the United States mainland operations of tbe heavy
and iDdustriaJ construction divisions, as \IreIl as an Canadian actiYitie8,
President. DilImrhRm COI'-'lITut'hnn' mtemational. Inc.. ~nto..
C"...alifomm, Din=ed opentioaa of the Intal'D&limW CIODI1IlIClion
subsidiary. Respoaabilitics mcluded deYelopiDg opentiDg and
strI.~ p1am, determ.iniDg market opportuaitiea, selecting and
nesotiatiug with ,joint vcuturc partDers, overseeing opentiom for
1IpODIIOt"ed projects and follow throush on coatl'aCtDal commita)eot to
clients. Participated as I member of the cxecutiYe committee of
Dillit,prn ConStruction Co%pora1iOIl in determining long raoge plans
of its mbsidiaries..
VICe Presidlmt Ot11i-nlUll COD&trnt!tinn NA. Inc:... PI~-2santon
CalifOt'1U&. Din:ctcd all . marine ventures' and 5&:lected heavy
constructioo projeats. Participated in the d=vclopment and strategy
plans aud marketing, . from _lAMil'1gproje= to bid tbrouJh managing
the fullll outcome on SUCCCIISfu1 bids..
; t
.
..
- 2 -
IMft.M 1. ~
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 15 of 26
-'
19I5 - 1*
GOODJ,BAND CONST.RlJCl10N,"JNC.
VICe President and Genera1 W'~. Imrur. TI"JI"" Reapooaible for
administration, str&tep: objectiYes, financial goals, and all day-to-da.y
operations of the merit shop .~.
Iftl - D8S
DILUNGBAM CON'STRUCTlON CORPORATION
VJCI! President ~ima~ p)"__lUd'Itnn ~lionDa..' Directed
estimating actiYi1iea for all. COMttUCtion projects on the Uniled States
mainland and in international locat.imts.
VICe P,.-..;nent. nminpam l".nnlllrt1t'ltiml N A... Ine:.... PI__ntnn
California. In cbaqe of operations and estimates for marine
VCDtU(e5 aDd ralatcd .heavy and iDdusttial projetn.
Va ~dl!lnt. rn&JintJham Co~ Ltd.. Nortb V_nenllWlr. B.C_
C'..Aft.~... Responsible for all campany marine and _-.y ..uUStruCtioa
actMties. Directed.activities in marine. ecp~--t, a;pecia1 projecu,
and hea\IY ~ dMsioas.
D61 - 1981
PETEIt. KIEWrI' SONS' CO.
Araa MaD_~. Les F..rrt~es .IQ.il Ltee..Montteal. 0IIebec.
RespoIISIble for Kiewit. CODJtructicm aotiYitiell i1l Eutenl CaDada., aod
in charge of the Area .Of6ce in Moatreal, .~g ~
estAmates on rm~iful bids, respoosibI.e for pJ.-nnin&, inhial
proatremeat actioa. .moni:toriog CIOSt$ aud prosr- of all activeepro;edB, aDd ~strale8ic aad fiDancia1 goal&.
P~eet Manaer. Lea Consttndman ICH.R. J~eI BV. ("'--~.
Organized and ~aD aetMties on the $lSO million Du8CII1
. Dykea ernhanhltem: project, io9olviaa alCaYauon asut pla=DCDl of
15 million cabic yards of material and the IleUODIIl mobilization of
over 600 ~. for: four tiekt -.oDS.
MR~r!'. R.,.ponal PAimato., nfr_ Cleveland. Ohio. In cbIqe of
--tiDe office. prc:parins csUmates for beIrvy eap=oriD& work on
the Eat Coast of United Swa and Canada. ReIipC"'..dbil~ties
ClIte&decl to plAn1t~ OIl all ~ bidI, iDitiId procunIDICIlt
. actiOll., aud monitoring of CXIIts ad proareu on an ~ he8\'f
COI1ItrUCtiorI projeats OIl. the But Coat.
- 3 -
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 26
.
RanaId J. ~l
r
/~
Proiec:l:EnIlinccr. Joint Vtmtme with Morrison-Knudsen Co. and
Sla~ A.-w_ts. 6..~rd Streel Tube aftd Tunnel Prq;ect. New York
Citv-t New York. Respcmsible far all ~ fuoc:siOD$OD. this
$70 million project oonsiBting of building. undergroUDd f,al!ll1ities far . a
four-track t8ilroad adCDcbs from 6:k1t. Street m ManbaUaD, under
the .WestCbannel afthe But RiYer, throup. Welfare l8JaDd, IDd
finally UDder the West. CbaImel of cbe East River: iota 41st Aft:QDe
in Oueooa, New York.. project iocIudc:d two. vcmtilating atr'IICturCS,
concrete tunIIe1a. a subway station, 8Dd placDJs pre-formed tubes in
both the Bast and West a..,mAIs .of the But River. Also
respolllible for orpnimtion .of Ole cmJiDccring stiff and most of the
bu8inea upet:U for the ,;omt venture. .
Eltimate~r. Home Qff'~ Ertlrinemi.. and 'P..bma,m,
~rtmenl:L Omaha.. N...hrllakll. .ResponIfWc for sponsoring
CODStI11ction estimates for heavy. ~ pnjecu.
Tube OutflttinJ Fi..l\II'i.-.r, Tr.D5~Bav Tube ~ect. B~ Atr::a~id
Transit District. RelpOllliblc for' plaftfti"t aod edw~.r;ng '1LCltMtica
concerJled witbtube olUfittiD& initiatin& pro,uu_ent action.
coordinating and ~ preparation. of. construction drawiop and
maintaDJ.ins budget and cost CODU"Ol' fex tbia malfi...miDion dollar joint
vcns:ure pro;ect CODBistiDg of placinitubes across the San Frandsc:o
Bay, liDiing Oakland aud San Francisco.
L
~JiDeer 1E.&tintlltor. Home Off'JCe. nm.hA N....b Prepared
amstru.ction estimates on concrete structures, tuIu1eI. e:xcavatiOD .and
tumid 1iDing. Prepared the layout and. desjp of plants. fa~itw and
roads. Visited ails to supcm.e e8timat.\a.& and CDJiDecring.
Tunnel F.q~nt!'!:l!r. Smith Power Tmmd R~, ~. 0rt!lJan.
Scheduled and pJaaned all CODIttUClion activities, rental and purcbue
of eqWpmeat, perionned layCNt aDd constnaclioR desip, aDd
maiDtaiDed liai.on with Owuer'$ r l..p. :s UlU.tive.
Form ~irner/Strnr'll"f"f" ~nP.f!I'. CpmeD Smith ~.lrorlril'.
Prqiect. 'Bum!me. Oregon. I>eajpecI and detailed forms fCJ(
TraDbridge Spillway IDd PowerhOUle and was ..SIrucRwe& Eagineer for
the form fabrication yard on the Smith Spillway and SmiIb Intake
atructarCIII.
E1II!ineeriM in TntminJ. Omaha. Nebrqka. TraiMsI in compauy
method of CDIIStIUCtioD deaip. and estimating. Wcxb:cl on pianaiDa
and layout of.CDIJJlnId.iorl. pl8I1U and roads to detenniDe ~
and oc:oaom.X: feaibili.ty. .
199 - 361
KANSAS irl'ATE UNIVEUlTY
hmructor - ~1'nnMIt of Ciril E.ntrin~ Taught 88ftnI. councs
relatiDt to deaip., c.onstrUCtion and maizn:cnance of railroads
Inghways and aitports. '
Research Fellow. ~~t of ~ed MechanicL Awarded a
R~ ~~ by Phillips Petroleum Co. to imestiptc the
optmunn vl&COSIty of 1ISpha1t cement with reprd to aspbaJL paviu&
methods.
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 26
RECeIVED
MAR 3 0 2005
Baa,., af ~ CommiaaIoner.
DATE: March 28, 2005
FROM: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Comml~
TO: Elections Office
RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments
The Board of County Comm1~ners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment
to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are
registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please list the comml~n district in which each applicant resides.
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
COMMISSION DISTRICT
Anthony P. Pires, Jr.
209 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 3411 0
o
Thank you for your help.
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 26
DATE: March 28, 2005
FROM:
TO: Maria ~ Tourism Office
RE: Coastal Advisory Committee
As you know, we currently have vacancies on the above-refi.:tenced advisory committee. A press
release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for
consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
Anthony P. Pires, Jr.
209 Madison Drive
Naples, FL 34110
Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment of the advisory committee
within the 41 day time-ftame, and I will prepare an executive swmnary for the Board's consideration.
Please categorize the .ppDeaD" iD areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at
774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 19 of 26
lilson s
em:-
advisoryboardS@colliergov.net
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 9:38 AM
To: filson_s
Subject: New On-line Advisory Board Application Subnitted.
~
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Tel: (231) 774-3602
Fax: (231) 77....02
....t~: ..1
:....... ~ "
, .'
f( .,1 )
March 20, 2005
Application for Advisory Committees I Boards
Name: Anthony P. Pires, Jr. Home Phone: 239-450-2474
Home Address: 209 Madison Drive
-e
City: Naples Zip Code: 34110
Fax Number: 239-649-7342 Business Phone: 239-649-6555
Ernall Address: apires@wpl-legal.com
Place of Employment: Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A
How long have you lived in Collier County? More than 15 years
Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the law? No
Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes
Board I Committee Applied for: Coastal Advisory Commottee
Category: (if applicable) Unincorporated Area representative
I
1- e
Do you currently hold public office? No
3/21/2005
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 26
-
Do you now serve, or have you served on a Yes
Collier County board or committee?
If yes, please list the boards I committees:
Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee (2002-
present) Collier County Land Acquistion Advisory
Committee Collier County Development Services Advisory
Committee (2002) Pelican Bay Services Division
MSTU/BU Advisory Board (1993 to 1999). Collier County
Planning Commission Citizens Advisory Committee/Collier
County Growth Management Plan, 7-Year Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (1995-1996). Collier County
Environmental Policy Technical Advisory Board (1991 to
1993). County Planning Commission Citizens Advisory
Committee on Collier County Growth Management Plan
(1987-1988).
Please list your community activities:
Board of Directors, Collier County Bar Association (1997
to 2001). Naples North Rotary Club, 1985 to 2001
(President 1992-1993).
e
Education:
College: SUNY at Buffalo, 1968-72, B.A., History 1972
Graduate: Florida State University College of Law 1972-
75, J.D. 1975
Experience I Background:
PRESENT: Shareholder, VVoodward, Pires & Lombardo,
P.A., 3200 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200, Naples,
Florida, with the firm from November, 1986 to present,
practicing primarily in the field of land use, land
development, governmental practice and general real
estate with some litigation practice. Florida Bar Certified in
City, County and Local Government Law (August 1998-
2008) PRIOR: Contracts Administrator, VVestinghouse
Communities of Naples, Inc., Naples, Florida, September,
1983 to November, 1986. Assistant County Attorney,
Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Naples,
Florida, April, 1979 to June, 1981. Assistant State
Attorney, Office of the State Attorney, Twentieth Judicial
Circuit, Naples, Florida, September, 1975 to April, 1979
and June, 1981 to August, 1983.
.
3/21/2005
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
March 7, 2005
TO:
Elections Office . o.-t-
Sue Filson, Executive Manager 1.( \
Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
RE:
Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 26
The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment
to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are
registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides.
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMlTIEE
COMMISSION DISTRICT
Gerald W. Camiener
7022 Green Tree Drive
Naples, FL 34108
~
~
Thomas W. Sansbury
840 Riverpoint Drive
Naples, FL 34102
Thank you for your help.
I ~_.
~c€.\,,€.Q
~ \A19- 1\ 't> 1\I\f>
_...,~~
~cJ,---
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 22 of 26
DATE:
March 7, 2005
TO:
Maria Bernal, Tourism OfJice~
Sue Filso~ Executive Manag I
Board of County Comrnissio ·
FROM:
RE:
Coastal Advisory Committee
As you know, we currently have a vacancy on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press
release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for
consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
Gerald W. Camiener
7022 Green Tree Drive
Naples, FL 34108
Thomas W. Sansbury
840 Riverpoint Drive
Naples, FL 34102
Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment of the advisory committee
within the 41 day time-frame, ( Apri118~ and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's
consideration.
Please categorize the applicants in areas of eIpertDe. If you have any questions, please call me at
774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
---
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 23 of 26
fllson_s
em: advisoryboards@colliergov.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 15,200510:29 AM
To: filson_s
Subject: New On-line Advisory Board Application SubrTitted.
~~~
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East T....iaml Trail
NllpIes, FL 34112
Tel: (23') 774-3602
Fax:(23')77~2
f(t~:'.1
.
: ~ ~
~ .'
. . .;
.~ '. . i ..: ~ ';
February 15, 2005
Application for Advisory Committees I Boards
Name: Gerald W. Camiener Home Phone: 239-514-1148
Home Address: 7022 Green Tree Drive
e
City: Naples Zip Code: 34108
Fax Number: 239-514-1149 Business Phone: 239-514-1148
Email Address:gwcnap@aol.com
Place of Employment: Retired
How long have you lived in Collier County? 10-15 years
Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the law? No
Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes
Board I Committee Applied for: Coastal Committee
Category: (if applicable) No information provided.
-e
Do you currently hold public office? No
2/15/2005
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 24 of 26
-
Do you now serve, or have you served on a
Collier County board or committee?
No
Please list your community activities:
No information provided.
Education:
A.B., Wayne State University Ph.D., Massachusetts
Institute of Technology A.M.P., Harvard Business School
Experience J Background:
University teaching and research, Wayne State, M.I.T. and
Kalamazoo College Chemical and biological research
experience at universities and The Upjohn Pharmaceutical
Company Group President at ICN Pharmaceutical
Company Chairman and CEO Amresco Inc. and CBG
Biotech, Ltd.
-
e
2/15/2005
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Page 25 of 26
Addendum To An Earlier Application For The Coastal Advisory Committee
Applicant: Gerald W. Camiener
Date: April 16, 2005
Please accept my apologies for not furnishing the following information in my original application. I was
under the impression that this information would be requested at a later date when I was interviewed by a
person, or persons representing the County Commissioners.
Interests and Background:
Ph.D. in Biology and Chemistry with a long-time interest in ecology
Certified scuba diver and long-time fisherman
Purposely live in Pelican Bay because of its proximity and easy access to the beaches and the Gulf
Have been vacationing and living in South Florida since the early 1970's; a Florida resident since 1984;
and a Naples resident since January 1994
Retired and am interested in becoming more active in local affairs
Exoerience:
Group President ICN Pharmaceuticals
President and CEO, Amresco, Inc.
President and CEO, CBG Biotech, Ltd.
President, MIT Student Housing
Vice-President, Junior Chamber of Commerce
Adjunct Professor, Kalamazoo College
Member, Board of Directors of the American Cancer Society in Kalamazoo
Member, Harvard and MIT Clubs
Member, American Association Advancement of Science
Member, American Chemical Society
Member ofthe Conservancy and Audubon
Member of several election committees for school board officials and referendum issues
Member of a zoning advisory group
GWC:Addendum,Coasla1AdvisoryCommittee,4-16-05
-
-
-
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239) 774-8097
Fa~:(239)774-3602
Agenda Item No. 98
May 10, 2005
Pa e 26 of26
Application for Advisory Committees/Boards
N.-e: noma w. SaalbIU'y Home Pbo.e: 139 417 2843
Home Addreu: 840 Riverpoiat Drive Zip Code: 34102
Fu No. 139 417 0328-..11f'1t Pllue: 139 403 6808 e-maiI..adrea:tolDplclr@M1.coIII
Place of EmpIoymeat: Grey Oaks DeveIG)MIICIIt Corp.
Board or C-onitt<< Applied for: Colier Couty Coa.l AchiIory c..--Jtt<<
Category (if applicable):
E-.Ie: 0......- .. DIIDkt, ...... -~..
. .. . lay........
Bow 10.. bve YM 6ved ia Collier Couty: Yan 7 M...... 6
Are yo. . rqistaIed voter ia Collier CMIIty: Ya
Do you eIIITadIy ....d pablic oftke! No
If... ..... iJ CUt.tllee,
Have you ever beeD couvKted of..y oft'euse against tile Law!
If,... espI8iB:
No
Do you DOW serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier County board or colDDlittee! Yes
If yes, please lilt the com.itteesJboards: Enviro.aeatal Advisory Council-l999 to 2004
PIeaIe list YOIII' COIIIIDuRy IIdIvida (ciYk du., .apborlaood ~.-., de. .... poaitio..lteId: Collier
BdcIiIIc Udllltry Awoei..; Naples Area Board of ReaIton; De C-.enucy ef Soldlawat Florida; TIle
Florida Wilclife Fedeli .w.; De NatieaI AadabH Society; COItal Couervatioa AaodatiM; Studi.
Watda, IK.; WIIarfside H....WIIen A...a.dea, Praidnt; Pat Member .... ~ State 0' FIerida
EaviormaataJ RepIatiou COIDIIIiaioa
EdaatiOll: Gnldllllte .f Ullivenity of Florida CoUeae of ArdIitectare witIt . BadIeIor of SdeII~ ill .&.iIcIiIII
CoDStradioa; Gradate of Florida AtIaatic Ullivenity witIIi . Malter of~-eI$ AdmiJIiItnd:ioB
Experieace: NIItive Ji'lericliu, 35 years ill the ~ deveIepmmt aad raI alate _...,. iD Ji'Ie~ a
years II PraideIIt of Grey Oaks Devdopmaat Corp. ill Naples, Florida.
,........... .~. .~~ Jt1 V1~.t-l,."... ,.. YJ."~ """""j0.4_~..s-",..,E1raJIIItiNMM.pr..
.. s-i-fc-.,. .. r1~ MIl ,." r..... JNi, ~ FL J41l:l. If~ ....."..../fa,- w., ~ "J"
~114-.JaZ"""""slUfibon(ii!COl1intlo"."t!t. """~"'r . J....._...~-f~~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10,2005
Page t of 13
APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO TIlE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
OBJECTIVE: To appoint 1 member to serve the remainder of a vacant term, expiring on
December 14,2007, to the Development Services Advisory Committee.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Development Services Advisory Committee has 1 vacancy with
the term expiring on December 14,2007. This committee is composed of 15 members and
represent the various aspects of the development industry such as architect, general contractor,
residential or builder contractor, environmentalist, land planner, land developer, landscape
architect, professional engineer, utility contractor, plumbing contractor, electrical contractor,
structural engineer, and attorney. The purpose of this committee is to provide reports and
recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners to assist in the enhancement of
operational efficiency and budgetary accountability within the Community Development
Services Division and to serve as a primary communication link between the Community
Development Services Division, the development industry and the citizens of Collier County. A
list of the current membership is included in the backup.
There is currently one vacancy on this committee. A press release was issued and resumes were
received from the following 2 interested citizens:
APPLICANT
CATEGORY
mg ELECTOR ADV. COMM.
CURRENTLY SERVING ON
None
None
Frederick J. Reischl
William J. Varian
Land Planner
Contractor
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Frederick J. Reischl, term expiring on 12/14/07
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment, appoint 1 member, and direct the County Attorney to prepare
a resolution confirming the appointment.
Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
Agenda Date: MAY 10,2005
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
9C
Appointment of member to the Development Services Advisory Committee.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 13
Prepared By
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Date
4/22/20053:31:38 PM
Executive Manager to the BCC
BCC Office
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
4/27/20054:51 PM
County Manager's Office
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 13
Ii'
w
Memorandum
To:
Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
From:
Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator
Community Development and Environmental Services
Date:
April 18,2005
Subject:
Development Services Advisory Committee
Listed below are the applicants for the Development Services Advisory Committee. Both
applicants have been categorized in their area of expertise.
Fred Reischl
Land Planner; experience includes 15 years of planning experience in
the public sector (Collier County Government)
Master of Science Degree, and various ULI and APA conferences
William J. Varian
General Contractor; experience includes life time involvement in the
construction industry; local business owner for almost 16 years
College graduate, Certified Graduate Remodeler (CGR) and Certified
Aging in Place Specialist (CAPS)
At the April 6, 2005 meeting of the Development Services Advisory Committee, Fred Reischl
was recommended to fill the vacancy on the Development Services Advisory Committee.
Community Development and Environmental Services Division
Office of the Administrator
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 13
~
Development Services Advisory Committee
NIJ1fIe Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date T erlft
Home Phone Dal.eRe-appt 2ndExpDIIle 2nd Term
Mr. William J. Varian ~~ ~"'" 289-8013 12116/03 12114/07 4 Years /
210 31st Street, N.W. ~#('l' 352-7392
Naples, FL 34120
E-Mail: wjvl992@aol.com
District: 5
Category: General Contractor
Mr. Herbert Rosser Savage 394-1580 12/14/93 12/14197 4 Years
651 S. CoUier Blvd., #A2 394-2918 02/12/02 12/14/05 4 Years
Marco Island, FL 34145
E-Mail: shellsby@peganet.com
District: I
Category: Architect
Mr _ Dalas D. Disney 261-3399 10/18194 12/14/96 2 Years
~ 4745 Stratford Ct., #2303 ~2384 12/14/04 12/14/08 4 Years
Naples, FL 34105
E-Mail: D.Disney@earthlink.net
District: 4
Category: Architect
Mr. Blair A. Foley 263-1222 12/14/99 12114/03 4 Years
120 Edgemere Way South 289-4900 12116/03 12/14/07 4 Years
Naples, FL 34105
E-Mail: folsOOO@aol.com
District: 3
Category: Engineer
Mr. Robert J. Mulhere 649-1509 09/10/02 12/14/04 2 Years
1946 Sheffield A venue 12/14104 12/14/08 4 Years
Marco Island, FL 34145
E-Mail: rjm@consuh-rwa.com
District: 1
Category: Land Planner
Wednesday, Deumbo 15,2004
Page 1 014
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 13
---.
Development Services Advisory Committee
Name Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DmeRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term
Mr. Peter Van Arsdale 649-6112 11/14/00 12/14/03 3 Years
123 11 th A venue South 253-8246 12116/03 12/14107 4 Years
Naples, FL 34102
E-Mail: petervana@earthlink.net
Distrid: 4
Category: Construction
Mr. Clay C. Brooker 261-9300 09/10/03 12/14/05 2 Years
271 Broad Avenue South, #201 213-0910
Naples, FL 34102
E-Mail: cbrooker@yvvalaw.com
District: 4
Category: Attorney
Mr. Jason Hamilton Mikes 261-9555 12/14/04
3225 Cypress Glen Way, #101 597-7371
Naples, FL 34109
E-Mail: jmikes@becker-poliakofEcom
District: 2
Category: Attorney
Mr. George H. Hermanson 254-2000 12114/04
140 West Street 597-4895
Naples, FL 34108
E-Mail: georehennanson@holemontes.com
Distrid: 2
Category: Engineer
Mr. David B. Dunnavant 403-6875 12/14/04
6441 Sandalwood Lane 597-7145
Naples, FL 34109
E-Mail: Ddunnavant@barroncollier.com
District: 3
Category: Attorney
Wt!dnesday, Ihcemht!1' 15. 2004
Pagt! 2 0/4
12114/08
4 Years
12/14/08
4 Years
12/14/08
4 Years
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 13
Development Services Advisory Committee
Name Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term
Mr. Thomas Masters 592-7344 02/23/99 12/14/99 1 Year
4401 Pond Apple Drive 592-5853 12116/03 12/14/07 4 Years
Naples, FL 34119
E-Mail: tommastersofvineyardS@naples.com
District: 5
Category: Professional Engineer
Mr. Marco A. Espinar 263-2687 12/14/99 12/14/03 4 Years
3880 Estey Avenue 12/16/03 12/14/07 4 Years
Naples, FL 34104
E-Mail: marcoe@prodigy.net
District: 3
Ctdegory: Environmental Planner
Mr. Charles Morgan Abbott 649-6565 12114/93 12/14/97 4 Years
1306 28th Avenue North 649-4286 02/12/02 12/14/05 4 years
- . Naples, FL 34103
E-Mail: captabbott@aol.com
District: 4
Category: General Contractor
Mr. Justin Martin 649-4040 02/12/02 12/14105 4 Years
5353 23rd Avenue, S.W. 455-1535
Naples, FL 34116
E-Mail: justinmartin@wilsonmiller.com
District: 3
Ctdegory: Professional Engineer
Mr. Brian E. Jones 793-1133 12/14/99 12/14/03 4 Years
2121 Heritage Tr. 643-5100 12116/03 12/14/07 4 Years
Naples, FL 34112
E-Mail: tamiamibld@aoLcom
District: 1
Category: General Contractor
Wednesday, December 15,2004
Page3of4
~....
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 13
...--,.....
Development Services Advisory Committee
Name
Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term
This 15 member committee was created on 10/12/93 by Ord. No. 93-76, amended on 11/07/95
by Ord. No. 95-60 to add additional calegOIies of industry membership rep&~jlation. This
committee represents the various aspects of the development industry such as architect,
general \OUIlbactOll, residential or building \OUIlbac;to(, environmentalist. 81d pBlner, land
developer, 1aI.dscape S'ChilBct, 1)101" lllional engineer, utility contractor, plumbing ........b-.tv..,
electrical cohtrador. structt.nI engineer, and attorney. The purpose of this committee is to
provide reports and reoommendations 10 the see 10 assist in the entwlcBment of operational
effideney and budgelary accountability within the Community Development Services Division
and to serve as a prim~ communication link betuJ8en the Commooity Development Services
Division, the development industry and the citizens of Collier County. Terms are 4 years.
FLSTAT
Stoff: Joseph Schmitt, Comm Dev & Env Services Administrator: 403-2385
Wednesday, December 15, 2004
Page4of4
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 13
MEMORANDUM
TO:
March 7, 2005
Elections Office &
Sue Filson. Executive Manager
Board of County Commission
DATE:
FROM:
RE:
Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments
The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment
to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are
registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADV COMM
COMMISSION DISTRICT
Frederick J. Reischl
1455 29th Street, S.W.
Naples, FL 34117
5
:5
Wtlliam J. Varian
21031. Street, N.W.
Naples, FL 34120
Thank you for your help.
RECE.\VE.O
",~R 0 ~ 1.UU5
aoatd ofCOUn\Y ~
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10,2005
Page 9 of 13
DATE:
March 7, 2005
TO:
Joseph K. Schmitt, community~ev lopment & Environmental Services Administrator
Sue Filson, Executive Manager '
Board of County Commissioner
FROM:
RE:
Development Services Advisory Committee
As you know, we currently have a vacancy on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press
release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for
consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
William 1. Varian
210 31st Street, N.W.
Naples, FL 34120
Frederick 1. Reischl
1455 29th Street, S. W.
Naples, FL 34117
Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment of the advisory committee
within the 41 day time-frame (Apri118~ and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's
consideration.
Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at
774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 13
filson_s
From: advisoryboards@collergoy.net
Sent: Thursday, March 03. 2005 2:32 PM
To: filson_s
Subject: New On-Nne Advisory Board Application Subnitted.
~
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tarniami Tran
Naples, FL 34112
Tel: (239) 774-3802
Fax: (239) 774-3802
t
f(~1
. ~.
.
: ~ ~
~ .-
~ a :-
.. . .,
.~.. - .~, ~ /
March 03, 2005
Application for Advi80ry Committee8 I Board8
Name: Frederick J. Reischl Home Phone: 239-353-2332
Home Address: 1455 29th St SW
City: Naples Zip Code: 34117
Fax Number: 239-566-2203 Business Phone: 239-597 -3111
Email Address:reischl@abbinc.com
Place of Employment: Agnoli, Barber & Bn.ndage, Inc.
How long have you lived in Collier County? More than 15 years
Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the law? No
Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes
Board I Committee Applied for: Development Services Advisory
Committee
Category: (if applicable) land planner
Do you currently hold public office? No
313/2005
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 13
Do you now serve, or have you served on a No
Collier County board or committee?
Please list your community activities:
American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP), member
American Planning Association, Florida Chapter (FAPA),
member Naples Bay Rotary, Past President Rotary District
6960, Assistant Area Governor Oakridge Middle School
PTA, Past President Cub Scout Pack 50S, Past Den
Leader St Elizabeth Seton Church, member
Education:
Bachelor of Science.; Fairleigh Dickinson University,
Teaneck NJ; 1975 Master of Science; Fairleigh Dickinson
University, Teaneck, NJ; 1980 Urban Land Institute
conferences American Planning Association conferences
Experience I Background:
15 years of work experience for Collier County Community
Development & Environmental Services Division in
environmental review and planning
3/3/2005
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10, 2005
Page120f13
fllson_s
From: advisoryboards@colliergov.net
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 4:39 AM
To: filson_s
Subject: New On-line Advisory Board Application Submitted.
~~U'
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tami8mi Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Tel: (231) 774-3602
Fax: (231) 774-3802
t
<<~I
. I..
.
:...... I '1
~ ,
.. ... . ..,.
.~ ". -. 4, ~ /
March 04, 2005
Application for Advisory Committees I Boards
Name: William J. Varian, CGR CAPS Home Phone: 239-352-7392
Home Address: 210 31st St NW
City: Naples Zip Code: 34120
Fax Number: 239-732-0820 Business Phone: 239-289-8013
Ernail Address: WJV1992@AOL.COM
Place of Employment: VVM. J. Varian Const. Co., Inc.
How long have you lived in Collier County? More than 15 years
Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the law? No
Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes
Board I Committee Applied for: DSAC
Category: (if applicable) General Contractor
Do you currently hold public office? No
3/4/2005
Page 2of2
Agenda Item No. 9C
May 10, 2005
Page 13 of 13
Do you now serve, or have you served on a Yes
Collier County board or committee?
If yes, please list the boards I committees:
Board of Adjustments and appeals Develpoment Services
Advisory Committe
Please list your community activities:
2005 President of the Collier Building Industry Association
Past Chairman of the CBIA Remodelors Council Active
with the Naples Saint Patricks Day Parade Committe
Education:
College graduate, Certified Graduate Remodelor (CGR)
Certified Aging in Place Specialist (CAPS)
Experience I Background:
Local business owner for almost 16 years, envolved in the
constructiuon industry all my life, I do all company
permitting and have since day one
3/4/2005
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 90
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 12
APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO THE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY
OBJECTIVE: To re-appoint 3 members to serve 5 year terms to the Educational Facilities
Authority.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Educational Facilities Authority has 3 terms expiring. This 5-
member authority was established by the BCC on March 23, 1999 by Resolution No. 99-177
pursuant to FL STAT 243.18 - 243.40 to transact any and all business and to exercise any and all
powers authorized by the Act for an educational facilities authority. International College
requested an EF A to assist with tax-exempt financing of its now administrative/classroom
facilities planned for the Northbrook College PUD. EF A is limited only to financing projects on
behalf of private, nonprofit, post secondary educational facilities. Terms are 5 years. A list of
the current membership is included in the backup.
The terms for Ross P. Obley and John Agnelli will expire on June 12,2005 and the term for John
R. Humphrey expired on March 23, 2004. A press release was issued and resumes were received
from the following 3 interested citizens:
APPLICANT
~
ELECTOR
ADV. COMM.
CURRENTLY SERVING ON
,--
John R. Humphrey 4 Yes Industrial Development Authority
Educational Facility Authority
John J. Agnelli I Yes Industrial Development Authority
Educational Facility Authority
Ross P. Obley 2 Yes Industrial Development Authority
Educational Facility Authority
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: John R. Humphrey, term expiring March 23,2009
John J. Agnelli, term expiring June 12, 2010
Ross P. Obley, term expiring June 12,2010
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment, appoint 3 members, and direct the County Attorney to prepare
a resolution confirming the appointments.
Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
Agenda Date: MAY 10,2005
,...~.
Agenda Item No. 90
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 12
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
90
Appointment of members to the Educational Facilities Authority.
5/10/2005900:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Sue Filson
Executive Manager to the BCC
4/22/2005 3:31 :38 PM
Board of County
Commissioners
BCC Office
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4/27/2005 5:06 PM
Agenda Item No. 90
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 12
DONALD A. PICKWORm, P.A.
A TTORNEY AT LAW
SUITE 502 NEWGA TE TOWER
5150 NORTH TAMIAMI TRAIL
SUITE 502
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103
e-mail: picklawCearthUnk.net
(239) 263-8060
FAX (239) 598-1161
April 18, 2005
Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County
Attn: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Collier County Courthouse, Building"F"
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112-4977
Re: Appointments to Educational Facilities Authority
Dear Commissioners and Ms. Filson:
Attached is a letter from the Chair of the Educational Facilities Authority
recommending there-appoinnnent of our current members John R. Humphrey, John J.
Agnelli, and Ross P. Obley. We highly recommend their reappointment.
If you need further information, please give me a call.
Agenda Item No. 9D
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 12
CollUr COunty EducotiolUll FaeilitUs Authority
3050 North Horseshoe DrlJlt, Suitt 120
Naples, Florida 34104
(941) 263-8989
Alice J. Carlson,
Choir
BIU'bara M. ROlenbe,."
Vice Choir
Ross P. Oble"
Secretary
John J. AgneUi
John R. Humphrey
April 18, 2005
Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County
Attn: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Collier County Courthouse, Building"F"
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112-4977
Re: Appointments to Educational Facilities Authority
Dear Commissioners and Ms. Filson:
The Educational Facilities Authority has discussed the re-appointment of our current
members John R. Humphrey, John J. Agnelli, and Ross P. Obley. All of these individuals
have served the Authority for many years and the Authority relies heavily on her experience
and knowledge. and recommends their reappointment.
If you need further information, please give me a call.
7lZ~
Alice J. Carl
Chair
Agenda Item No. 90
May 10, 2005
Page50f12
Educational Facilities Authority
Name Work PhOfle Appt'd Exp. Date Term
HOIIU! Phone DoteRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term
Mr. Ross P. Obley 591-1802 03/23/99 03/23/0 1 2 Years
802 Slashpine Court 0611210 I 06/12105 4 Years .,/
Naples, FL 34108
E-Mail:
District: ;z.
Category:
?'JS - ~:L~
Mr. lohn AgneUi 34~~ 03/23/99 03/23/00 1 Year
-2966 Suuth ftorseshoe Dttve ;l"'<o 1J1r"~.-1j~06/12/01 06/12105 4 Years .,/
Naples, FL m'03 ""3\{Jt~
E-Mail: :JJ' ~ -' 1\e..1I; ~o(.~
District: I
Category:
Ms. Barbara Minch Rosenberg 389-2n1 03/23/99 03/23/03 4 Years
5963 Bermuda Lane 592-6199 04/22/03 04/23/08 5 Years
Naples, FL 34119
E-Mail:
District: :3
Category:
r
Mr. J. R. Humphrey 643-2020 03/23/99 03/23/04 5 Years /'
3963 Enterprise A venue 643-2010
Naples, FL 34104
E-Mail:
District: 4
Category:
Ms. Alice J. Carlson 435-3988 03/23/99 03/23/02 3 Years
2730 Leeward Lane 09/24/02 09/24/06 4 Years
Naples, FL 34013
E-Mail:
District: t.f
Category:
Mondq, December 06, 2(J()4
Pagt! 10f2
Agenda Item No. 90
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 12
Educational Facilities Authority
Name
Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term
EsIabIished by the BCC on March 23, 1999, Resolution No. 99-1n pUl"8lB1t to FL STAT
243.18 - 243.40 - (Higher Educational F8Cil1ties Authorities Law) to bwIsact any ...d all
business and to exercise any and all powers authorized by the Act for an educational facilities
authority. International College requested an EFA to assist with tax-exempt firBlCing of its now
adminislrativeldassroam facilities planned for the NorthbI'odt Village PUD. EFA is limited only
to financing projects on behalf of private, nonprofit, post secondary educational facilities.
Terms are 5 Years
~.
FL STAT 243.11 - 243.40
Stoff: Don Pickworth, Attorney: 263-8060
Monda:y, December IJ6, 2004
Page 2 of 2
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 90
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 12
DATE:
March 7, 2005
Elections Office &s
Sue Filson. Executive Manager ,
Board of County Commissione
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments
The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment
to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are
registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides.
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY
COMMISSION DISTRICT
John R Humphrey
2540 Talon Court, #504
Naples, FL 34104
1
John J. Agnelli
373 Bay Meadows Drive
Naples, FL 34113
I
~
Ross P. Obley
802 Slash Pine Court
Naples, FL 34108
Thank you for your help.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 0 2005
l3"l'lrd of C:"IJ~t1 Cc,mmissioner!<
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 90
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 12
DATE: March 7,2005
TO: Attorney Don Pickworth
oJ
FROM: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commission
RE: Educational Facilities Authority
As you know. we currently have vacancies on the above-referenced authority. A press release was
issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this authority to submit a resume for consideration.
I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
John R Humphrey
2540 Talon Court, #504
Naples. FL 34104
John J. Agnelli
373 Bay Meadows Drive
Naples, FL 34113
Ross P. Obley
802 Slash Pine Court
Naples, FL 34108
Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment ofthe authority within the 41
day time-frame (AprilI8~, and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration.
Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at
774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
Mar 03 05 11:15a
4VT7/V
:;x,r~ r~JaP.-,lterrfNol 90
'May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 12
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples,FL34111 1~'f.~r-[rfr:D
(239)774-8097 'q. ~, .
Fax: (239) 774-3602 .iflWi
"'.1
'j\.":{'
Application for Advisory CommitteeslBoards
Name: _ JAW If: $/?/p.</t24;;Y Home Phone: ,,"f- ~b23
Home Address: ?5~'7'A-UJ"; C r 4~-~~ Zip Code: 3' 4tf/ /0 ty
1:.';;: ,l/4-707.3 BusfnessPbone: ~q~-~2D" Z:!anaddress: .JL/./APL~S ti2a,M~A-Sr
PlaceoCEmployeement: /HTEf#A 'TL ;P~~N~ $rJCR'lA/G:r /#C ". P~T
Board or Committee Applied for: E 1J q C4rl"o",l./Ac... helt. (rre:s ~7~~1' TY'
Category {if applicable):
Example: CommluioD District, Developer, eavlrollmeatall.t, lay persoa. elc.
How long have you lived in Collier County: Years
~o
~No
Months
Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes
Do you currently hold public office? Yes
If 10, what is tbat office?
::'io
~
Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the Law?
If yes, elCplaio:
Yes
No r
Do you DOW serve, or have you ever served, 00 a Collier County board or committee? Yes
If yes, please list the committeeslboards:
.:z:-D,4 ~A
r No
~A-r:r~ /Y7AN'ACe ..,.,,.Jy ""-::';;d1Mrr,g.r
Please list your community activities (civic clubs, neigbborbood associations, etc. and positions
held: BT4!"I-Atr
~~: ~:~...., A<<r_~r,..J
Education: ~A/C/Vd!1!!'"R/~ - .a.~ZJu'F ~('V
.
Experience:
,i?,I'/4.lC" ~ S"~ 0c S'/&:'N' €I(fC;'iWE~te/AJt;;
~ ~~......v E.I>c..
,,. ,., " . f7'PA
Pktzulllt4dt 'Ilry .ddltU_ll_/II-.t/Dn)1011 fed JNnm-L TIIu .,p1iCtltiM sIuudJI befll-MII III Sae Fi1sM, &ecIIIJ~ M_K" III
tlte JIfIwllfCtlIUl(y~""., JJ(JJ I!tuIT_u-l TnrlI, Nllpln, FLJ4112. /fYflIl wirh,pl_ffIX}'4IIII'ttpp/ictta-11I
(2n) 774-3602 or -.il III Jludih,,,,fJilconkr?o.,,,,.d. T1t-.t ytlllfiu ~II# '11 retW tIM ~... IIfClI1/Wr CIlIIIIt)1.
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 90
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 12
filson_s
From: Jjagnelli@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 3:04 PM
To: filson_s
Subject: Re: IDA & EFA
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239) 774-8097
Fax: (239) 774-3602
Application for Advisory Committees/Boards
Name:_Jobn J. Agnelli
Home Address:_373 Bay Meadow. Dr. Zip Code:34113
Bome Pbone:139-774-3726
Fu No.2J9-793-0552 Business Pbone:2J9-775-22JO e-mail addrels:jjagnelli@aol.com
Place of Employeement: Power Corporation
Board or Committee Applied for:Industrial Development AutboritylEducational FadIities Authority
Category (if applicable):
~pIe: c---....... DIdrict. Dneloper. ........-.............1lIy ..-. de.
How long bave you lived in Collier County: Yean 33 Months
Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes_X No
Do you currently bold public office? Yes_X No
If so, what Is that oftke? _Industrial DevelopmeDt AutlaoritylEducatioaal J'ac:Uities Autlaority
Have you ever been convicted of any offense apinst the Law!
U yes, e:s.plain:
Yes
No_X_
Do you DOW serve, or bave you ever served. OD a CoUier Couaty bcNIrd or committee? Yes _X_ No
If yes, please list the oommitteeslboants:
Industrial Development Autbority & Educational Fxilities Authority
Please list your community activities (civic: clubs, neighborhood aJlOCiation., ek. and positions beld:
Cbair, Board or Trustees, International CoUege
3/3/2005
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item No. 90
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 12
Education:_Bachelor of Arts, McMaster Univenity, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
ExperienceHave served on both of the above named Boards for sevenl years. Have also served on local
Bank boards, YMCA of Collier County Board and othen.
n-e IIIlIIdI -,. tIIlditi-.J ;,,/DrrIIIIIitm ,../_ ~ TIWt "1'1"'--"" ."-11I be/~ III S_ Fib... ~_ M..."."o
tit_ B~ofc.urty ~...., 33tJl Eat T...... TrtIiJ, NIIpIG, FL ~1l2. (f"'-",""'-/-JltlW-.,pI-----1II
(239)774-34112 or...-il1l1 SMq~tw.1UI. TIt-" JaIlor ~ to __ 1M citi;ea ofC<<li6 CIJIUIIy.
Jobn J. Agnelli
()Or.ce:239-775-2230
Cell: 239-285-0345
3/3/2005
7-19-1995 3:21PM
FROM
Agenda Item No. ~O 2
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 12
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East TamiaoU Trail _
Naples, FL 34112 'qf::ClJ\!r:f )
(239) '714-8097
Fu: (239) 77~" 'n:-'1
bOd' '. .
. ~ ~ ',;,-:
Home Address: lfJb 2-
$'Y/--..2Y.z 3
Fax No.
Application for Advisory CommitteesJBoards
R~.s-s- ~ &B{ff~ HomePhone:tGr) 571'..../8d'.2
>;L~ ~/#'r 0-' ~t!IlP'ZJpcode: 37'/tPe
, /7
e-maUaddrelAl: K(;)S'.r~o,rr~AloL ...t"~
Name:
P1aee of Employeemcnt.
Business Phone:
LJer/~C./)
Board or Committee AppUedfor: ~- .z;>t/(~ //t::>,A/ ,/)I-("/~/r/ff ~fT,V'"ae'/l";V
CategOry (if applicable):
Eomple: ComDIiuloJl DiICrlct, DweJoper, MMl"OllmaG...w.lay PCf1IlIII, ete.
How IoDI have you lived in Collier County: Yean ;2 '/ Months
Are you a ....eeiatered voter in CoWer Couaty: Yes V'" No
Do )'ou currently bold public ofl"aee? Yes No ~
II so, wbat is that oftice?
Have you ever been convicted of any offense a:.10.st the Law? Yos
If yes. explain:
No ~.
J)o you BOW 1el'Ve, or "ave you evil' Hrv4ld, on a Collia' Co,,"nl)' board er committee? ~. ~ No
If yes. pleue list the committealboa.rds:
.:L'N::t>v ('r" R /" APL ~a CJ"# oO'Vr A'C/fT/"-o~'/ 'P'
L-P(/(""A(l7t?/V,A~ ~A-c,~"7/K7' A'~~L1Ae/"'~
Educadon: ~~ t//Y/y ~ ~~~V#6#'
~ ....wYtOVc '-- ~_ _
E>qJoriea<e: 3<;--- faff WITP' ~~f'e EZ.rr}l')e/c
~~~;;;};~~ ~~===-~~:';:H/'#
p:bprr7i7~) % rr ~~:If~ ~pu"yrY -rCJh".e?~t'~
EV~L &Jg:J~~? ..4 vI?" ffA//? /17'/ __
n-ulll/lldt .....lIIUIIJtllIIIl ~ :1#I"f-".,.... 77Ib IillppUt:lldM wllltl Nf~ .. s- ,..., But:rfIlflll 11..... ill
1M ~ ""'e...., e_........, 33"llat T___l TMU, lV4f1In. FL U1JJ. J,f~ "*,,.~fict~ ~"".'It
(V9)17~fD2"..."".o 1tI._-~--tuL TJuutk~II"'~" _ tIw"..... ./CM/IIv c.-ty.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 17
....-...
APPOINTI\4ENTOF MEMBER(S) TO THE HEALTH FACILITIES AUTHORITY
OBJECTIVE: To re-appoint 2 members and appoint 1 new member to serve 4-year terms to the
Health Facilities Authority.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Health Facilities Authority had 2 terms expire on March 27,2005
and 2 vacancies. This 5-member authority was established by the Board of County
Commissioners on November 20, 1979, by Ordinance No. 79-95 in accordance with Chapter 154
of the Florida Statutes. The purpose ofthe Authority is to assist health facilities in the
acquisition, construction, financing and refinancing of projects in any corporated or
unincorporated area within the geographical limits of Collier County. Terms are 4 years. A list
ofthe current membership is included in the backup.
We currently have 2 vacancies, plus the terms for N. Rex Ashley and George C. Mohlke, Jr.
expired on March 27,2005. A press release was issued and resumes were received from the
following 3 interested citizens:
APPLICANT
mg
ELECTOR
ADV. COMM.
CURRENTLY SERVING ON
N. Rex Ashlev - re-aDDt. 4 Yes Health Facilities Authority
George C. Mohlke, Jr.- re-appt. 4 Yes Health Facilities Authority
Housing Finance Authority
Maria Cecilia Ferrao - new appt. 2 Yes None
,'-"
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N. Rex Ashley, term expiring on 03/27/09
George C. Mohlke, term expiring on 3/27/09
Maria Cecilia Ferrao, term expiring on 05/10/09
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: NONE
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment, appoint 3 members, and direct the County Attorney to prepare
a resolution confirming the appointments.
Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
Agenda Date: MAY 10,2005
,,-.-,
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 17
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
9E
Meeting Date
Appointment of members to the Health Facilities Authority.
5/10120059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Sue Filson
Executive Manager to the BCC
4122/2005 3:31 :38 PM
Board of County
Commissioners
BCC Office
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4/28/200512:46 PM
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 17
DONALD A. PICKWORTH, P.A.
ATrORNEY AT LAW
SUITE 502 NEWGATE TOWER
5150 NORm TAMIAMI TRAll.
SUITE 502
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103
e-mail: DicldawlJlearthllnk.net
(239) 263-8060
FAX (239) 598-1161
April 18, 2005
Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County
Attn: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Collier County Courthouse, Building"F"
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112-4977
Re: Appointments to Health Facilities Authority
Dear Commissioners and Ms. Filson:
The Board is considering the re-appointment of our current members N. Rex Ashley
and George C. Mohlke to the Health Facilities Authority. Mr. Ashley is our Chairman and
Mr. Mohlke is our secretary. They are valuable and experienced members without conflicts
of interest. Ms. Maria Ferrao has applied for a vacancy on the Authority. I know Ms. Ferrao
and she will bring valuable business and tax related knowledge to the Authority.
I highly recommend the re-appointment of Mr. Ashley and Mr. Mohlke and the
appointment of Ms. Ferrao.
If you need further information, please give me a call.
;&;y y~s.
Donald A. Pickworth
General Counsel and
Assistant Secretary
Jeb Bush
Governor
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 17
John O. Agwunobi, M.D., M.B.A.
Secretary
April 18, 2005
Board of County Commissioners of Collier County
3301 East Tamiami Trail, Building F
Naples, FL 34112-4977
Re: Appointments to Health Facilities Authority
Dear Board of County Commissioners:
I was so very pleased to receive both a five-year pin and your very nice letters regarding my service to the
Health Facilities Board. Thank you for your kind thoughtfulness. I do want to make you aware ofthe
need to re-appointment two of our current members and for the appointment of a new member to the
Collier County Health Facilities Authority.
The chairman of the Authority, N. Rex Ashley, and the Secretary, George C. Mohlke, have applied for re-
appointment. Both of these individuals have served the Authority for many years and the Authority relies
heavily on their experience and knowledge. Ms. Ferrao's qualifications have been reviewed by your
general counsel, and he advises she is well-qualified for appointment to the Authority. Accordingly, I
recommend the re-appointments of Mr. Ashley and Mr. Mohlke, and the appointment of Ms. Ferrao.
If you need further information, please do not hesitate to call me.
Very truly yours,
8:::~~~
/scc
cc: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
3301 Tamiami Trail E. Bldg. H
Naples, Florida · 34112-4961
Telephone (239) 774-8200
Joan M. CoIfw, M_D., M.P.H., Dlrec1.Or
~ Collier
County
Health
Department
Ca.u.,...C__.Jlttlp/loJ...lJed-.d
Ta 1M ",,_.,Ow C-_/Iy
Mailing Address:
Post Office Box 429
Naples. Florida · 34106-0429
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 17
Health Facilities Authority
Name Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term
Mr. N. Rex Ashley 03/27/01 03/27/05 4 Years /
261-7200
1044 Castello Drive. # 106
Naples, FL 34103
District: 4
Category:
Mr. George C. Mohlke, Jr. 262-1410 03/27/01 03/27/05 4 Years ./
P.O. Box 2312
Naples, FL 34106
District: 4
Category:
Dr. Joan Colfer 774-8210 04/11/00 06/15/02 2 Years
3301 E. Tamiami Trail 04/22/03 04/22/07 4 Years
Naples, FL 34112
District:
Category: Health Dept. Director
VACANT 06/15102 r/'
District:
Category:
VACANT
11/23103
/'
District:
Cotegory:
-----
W<<inesday, April 23, 2003
PflgeJ of 2
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 17
Health Facilities Authority
Name
Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDote 2nd Term
This 5 member authority was created on November 20,1979, by Ordinance No. 79-95 in
accordance with Chapter 154 of the Florida Statutes. The purpose of the authority is to assist
health facilities in the acquisition. construction, financing and refinancing of projects in any
corporated or unincorporated area within the geographical limits of Collier County.
Qualifications: County Resident. 18 years of age. Terms are 4 years.
FL STAT Chapter 154
Staff: Donald A. Pickworth, Attorney: 263-8060
,'---'0
WdtU!Sda" April 23, 2fJ03
Page2of2
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 17
DATE:
March 7, 2005
TO:
Elections Office &
Sue Filson, Executive Manager .
Board of County Commissione
FROM:
RE:
Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments
The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment
to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are
registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides.
HEAL TH FACILITIES AUTHORITY
COMMISSION DISTRICT
N. Rex Ashley
1029 West Lake Boulevard
Naples, FL 34103
~
i
~
George C. Mohlke, Jr.
1400 Pompei Lane, Unit 45
Naples, FL 34103
Maria Cecilia Ferrao
2305 Island Cove Circle
Naples, FL 34109
Thank you for your help.
RECE\Veo
M~R 0 8 2005
,.. missIoners
--.r....;~ r:;Ct"'ll~t'J \..om
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 17
DATE:
March 7,2005
Attorney Don Pickworth j
Sue Filson, Executive Manager ,
Board of County Commissione
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Health Facilities Authority
As you know, we currently have vacancies on the above-referenced authority. A press release was
issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this authority to submit a resume for consideration.
I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
N. Rex Ashley
1029 West Lake Boulevard
Naples, FL 34103
George C. Mohlke, Jr.
1400 Pompei Lane, Unit 45
Naples, FL 34103
Maria Cecilia Ferrao
2305 Island Cove Circle
Naples, FL 34109
Please let me know, in writing, the reconunendation for appointment of the authority within the 41
day time-frame (AprilI8~, and I will prepare an executive swnmary for the Board's consideration.
Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at
774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 17
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East TamialDi Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239) 774-8097
Fax: (239) 774-3602
Application for Advisory CommitteeslBoards
Name:.AI K'~x As ~I e V Home Phone: ~ /3- 0'- s-'-I
Home Address: /t1 J 9 tu,-5 f Ifk e 8 J lJ J.. /Jrl.tip:Scode: \. ~" 10 3
FnN~~~p~ ~[~OO ~................., (#. t W....J<i l ~":d:..~
..... ofEmpIoyeemeDC /V R~. >L
-... orC_AppIied for:e. ~ ~~; Li.--L ~$, J)......J 1..0 .e.; i;
Category (if applicable):
Example: Commlaio. Dillric:t, Devllloper. _vtro_1aIIIt., Illy pcnoD, m:.
How long have you lived In Collier Couaty: Y can
31
V
Months / 0
Are yon . registered voter in Collier County: Yes
No
Do you CIlITeDtIy hold publie offace? Yes
1110, wbat is that omu?
No
I/"
Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the Law?
l1ya, aplaiD:
Yes
No
v
Do you BOW serve, or have y.u ever served, 0 .
If ya, please Jlst dIle collUDlttaslboanls:
V No
Please list your ~! activ,ities (civic clubs, Deigbborbood auoclations, ete. ad positions
held: .~.p ~c. ~d..
"'-1ItIIId ~ dIIitiMuIJ ;,,~,..J-I ~ 77Iis fI/IIIIIetIIU'. rJrnI4 N f"""""''' S-l'1Iua. JiJt<<Idlw MPiI80 ,.
,.. ~ tljCMutty c-.---.., 3311 Eat T--..J Trd, N.... FL 31]]2. Ifpal' .....JIl-fa,..r ",;~,.
(Z39)17~ _........-n~w.-~ n..k,-jtw..J_-' ~.._ tltet:/tiuIU -t'c.l&rC-<JI.
PERSONAL:
Born:
Family:
fOUCA TI ON:
PROFESSIONAL:
Afflliations:
Organizations:
CIVIC
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 17
N. Rex Ashley
RESlItE
September 16, 1947 Franklin, Indiana
Son - Noel
Graduated from the Collier County school system in 1965.
Graduated from Florida State University in 1969 with a B. S.
in Accounting.
Numerous continuing education courses in various areas of tax,
accounting, management, non-profit organizations and governmental
entities.
1969-1973 - Staff accountant for Tornwall , Lang & Lee, CPA's,
St. Petersburg, Florida.
1973-1978 - Partner with Ashley & Co., CPA's, Naples, Florida.
1978-1982 - Partner with Taylor Edenfield, Gilliam & Wiltshire,
CPA's, Naples, Florida.
1982-Present - President of N. Rex Ashley, CPA, P.A., Naples,
Florida.
Florida Institute of CPA's
American Institute of CPA's
Tax Division of American Institute of CPA's
1975-Present - Swamp Buggy, Inc., holding offices of treasurer,
vice president and president.
1978-Present - Rotary International, holding local club offices
of treasurer, secretary and president.
1984-1989 - Naples Area Challber of COIIIDerce, holding offices
of treasurer, vice president and president.
1991 -Present - Member of Ti ger Bay Club of Co 111 er County.
holding office of secretary/treasurer.
1992-Present - Member of Collier County 4-H Foundation, holding
office of treasurer.
1992-1999 - Member of Collier County Education Foundation,
holding office of treasurer, board member.
1995-Present - Member of Naples Chapter of National AMBUCS,
holding office as boardmember, Vice President, President and
Treasurer.
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 17
fllson_s
From: advisoryboards@colliergov.net
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 10:58 AM
To: filson_s
Subject: New On-line Advisory Board Application Submitted.
~
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tami8mi TraY
Naples, FL 34112
Tel: (239) n4-3802
Fax: (239) n4-3602
ts
eJt'
I..
.
:......." # 'J
- ,
. . .;i
.:... ;'.., ~ '/
March 03, 2005
Application for Advisory Committees I Boards
Name: George C. Mohlke, Jr. Home Phone: 239-262-1410
Horne Address: 1400 Pompei Lane, Unit 45
City: Naples, FL Zip Code: 34103
Fax Number: 239-262-1150 Business Phone: 239-262-1410
Ernail Address: framoh@aol.com
Place of Employment: Fraser & Mohlke Associates, Inc.
How long have you lived in Collier County? More than 15 years
Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the law? No
Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes
Board I Committee Applied for: Collier County Hearth Facilities
Authority
Category: (if applicable) Re-appointment to this Authority
Do you currentty hold public office? No
3/3/2005
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10,2005
Page 12 of 17
Do you now serve, or have you served on a Yes
Collier County board or committee?
If yes, please list the boards I committees:
Rural Fringe Area Assessment Oversight Comm. (1999-
2002) Collier County Elections Resource Comm. (2001-
2002) CC Transit Review Advisory Comm (1998-2000)
MPO Citizens Advisory Comm (1987-1995; Chair, 1990-
1995) CC Fire District Consolidation Study Group (1988-
1991; Chair, 1988-1991) Tourist Development Council
(1983-1987; Vice Chair. 1985-1987) Housing Finance
Authority of Collier County (2002-Present; Secretary,
2003-Present)
Please list your community activities:
Carver Finance, Inc. Board of Directors and Chainnan of
Board David Lawrence Center Planned Parenthood
Greater Naples Civic Assn NAACP I and 2nd Vice
President CC Democratic Executive Committee, Chair
State Democratic Party Central Committee Democratic
National Committee Affordable Housing of Southwest
Florida, Inc.
Education:
University of Minnesota, BA (cum IsLlde)
Experience' Background:
Broad business and community service experience
relevant to the functions and purpose of this Authority,
including current service on this Authority.
3/312005
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 13 of 17
filson_s
.m:
advisoryboardsOcolliergov.net
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 3:22 PM
To: filson_s
Subject: New On-line Advisory Board Application Submitted.
~
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Tel: (239) 774-3602
Fax: (239) 774-3802
,~t~?
~rr;
February 03, 2005
Application for Advisory Committees I Boards
Name: Maria Cecilia Ferrao Home Phone: 239-591-4037
Home Address: 2305 Island Cove Circle
_ City: Naples Zip Code: 34109
Fax Number: No information provided. Business Phone: 239-634-9410
Emall Address:maria.ferrao@comcast.net
Place of Employment: No information provided.
How long have you lived in Collier County? 1-2 years
Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the law? No
Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes
Board I Committee Applied for: Collier County Helath Facilities Authority
Board
Category: (if applicable) Assisted Living Facilities for senior citizens.
-
Do you currently hold public office? No
213/2005
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 17
e
Do you now serve, or have you served on a
Collier County board or committee?
No
Please list your community activities:
Healthy Start Coalition of SW Florida, Inc. (Board
member). Chamber of SW Florida (member). Collier
County VVomen's Bar Association (member). Collier
County Bar Association (member). American Immigration
lawyers Institute (member).
Education:
ll.M. Taxation: Georgetown law Center (DC) (2001).
University of Florida, College of Law, Gainesville, FL
(1996). Rice University, Houston, TX (1886).
-~
Experience I Background:
Formed Section 501 (c){3) organizations for Aaron A.
Farmer, PA (2004). Charlotte County Attorney's Office
(Assl County Attorney) (2003-2004). Charlotte County
Housing Finance Authority (Board Member) (2003-2004).
Attended a Tax Exempt Bond Seminar hosted by The
National Assoc. of Bond Lawyers in Chicago (2003). Natl
Office of IRS (Income Tax & Accounting) (2001-2002).
Please review my resume for additional details.
e
2/3/2005
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 15 of 17
fi.son s
em:-
Maria Ferrao [rnaria.ferrao@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 4:55 PM
To: filson_s
Subject: FW: Col6er County Health Facilities Authority Board
FYI. I edited an emaill sent Don Pickworth today.
Subject: CoIIIerCbw.l) KeaItI'I raa"fti!s AuttIorJ(y Bbard
Dear Sue,
I am interested in working with The Collier County Health Facilities Authority Board (the -Health Boardj in Naples.
Attached above is my resume for your review.
I am very interested in working with assisted living facilities in Coller County for three reasons. First there is an acute
shol1age of assisted lving facilities in Collier County in relation to the high percentage of senior citizens lYing in said county.
Second, there is an even greater need for -affordable- assisted living facilities for those senior citizens who do not have the funds,
or familal support, but whose health problems and age require them to live in an assisted living facility. Third, there is a long wait
1st to get into assisted living facllties whether affordable or not in Collier County. For the reasons stated above, there appears to
be an acute need for assisted living facilities in Coller County. This shortage maybe exacerbated by the large number of senior
citizens that may have become displaced because of four hurricanes that hit SW Florida in 2004. Though, Naples was not directly
affected, there may be a movement of senior citizens from neighboring counties, who may have relocated here because Lee,
Charlotte, Hendry and Glades counties may not be able to meet their needs.
. Please note that I would also Ike to become more involved with assisted living facilities in Collier County for both personp'
ofessional reasons. On the personal note, I have a parent that &ves in an assisted living facilty in Coller County.
Professionally, I have worked on affordable housing and human services issues with Charlotte County. I wrote the bylaws for
Charlotte County Housing Finance Authority, and The Charlotte County Children's Services Council. Further, in spring 2003, I
attended a Tax Exempt Bond Seminar hosted by The National Association of Bond Lawyers in Chicago. CurrenUy, I serve on the
board for Healthy Start Coaltlon of SW Florida Inc., which helps at risk Infants within five counties in SW Florida. They were
interested In having a tax attorney on their Board, and as I have an LL.M. in Taxation from Georgetown Law Center in DC, and
have also worked The Department of Treasury, Office of The Internal Revenue Service, Associate Chief Counsel, Income Tax &
Accounting, in DC, I am able to serve them.
P>s I am also sensitive to the needs of senior citizens of Collier County, I would appreciate it if you would support my
petition to serve on the Health Board in Napfes, when and if they have meetings. Given the acute need for more assisted living
facilities in Collier County, I am sure such a board would be interested in meeting at least once every quarter. Please do not
hesitate to call me at 239-634-9410 (cell) or email me if you have any further questions. Thank you.
Best regards,
Maria Cecilia Ferrao
-
2/3/2005
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 16of17
e
MARIA CECILIA FERRAO
2305 ISLAND COVE CIRCLE
NAPLES, FL. 34109
239-591-4037
EDUCATION
Georgetown Univenity Law Center, Washington DC; LL.M. (Taution) 2001.
Thesis: "Characterization Issues in Business Models for Controlled Foreign Corporations
Engaged in e-Commerce in Light of Treasury's 2000 Subpart F Study." Thesis
Supervisor: Professor Leonard Terr, Baker & McKenzie, D.C.
Univenity of Florida CoUege of Law, GainesviUe, FL; JD 1996.
Book Award: "Techniques in Growth Management."
University of Florida Fisher School of Accounting, Gainesville, FL; 1992-1993.
Riee Univenity, Hooston, TX; MA (English Literatore) 1986.
Sophia College for Women, Bombay, India; BA (EngDsh Literature).
--
WORK EXPERIENCE
Aaron A. Farmer, P.A. Naples, FL; Associate; 6JIW-Present.
Prepared research memoranda on various domestic and international charitable issues including
cross-border grants under Sections 501(c)(3) and 501 (c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code; private
letter rulings for domestic and international charities; research memoranda on various tax
controversy issues; research memoranda on various sales tax issues under Florida law; entity
formation.
Charlotte County Attorney's Oftice Port Charlotte, FL; Assistant Coonty Attorney;
9/03-5/04.
Prepared land use ordinances for plan amendments and rezonings; resolutions for plat and street
vacations, and the transfer of development rights; reviewed preliminary plats for the Charlotte
County Land Development Department, attended Charlotte County Affordable Housing Advisory
Committee meetings; assistant county attorney for the Charlotte County Planning and Zoning
Department's Design Review Committee; prepared bylaws for the Charlotte County Housing
Finance Authority and The Charlotte County Children's Services Council.
Bendenon FrankUn Starnes & Hoh P A; Fort Myen, FL; Associate; 1/03-7103.
e
Responsible for research memoranda on various corporate tax issues such as a recapitalization
transaction under Section 368(a)(I)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code; analyzed various tax related
transactions.
Agenda Item No. 9E
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 17
e
PAGE TWO
MARIA C. FERRAO
Internal Revenue Service Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax &
Accounting), Washington, DC; Attorney Advisor; 9/01-9/01.
Responsible for administering various income tax provisions under the Internal Revenue Code;
contributed to a number of significant tax controversy matters (e.g., field service advice on
environmental remediation involving the claim of right doctrine) and private letter ruling requests
(e.g., treatment of demutualization transactions under Sections 1001 and ] 031 of the Code);
provided informal guidance to taxpayers on such diverse matters as the potential applicability of
the anticipatory assignment of income doctrine to the donation of lottery proceeds to a church in
connection with a church sponsored lottery, and the requirements for obtaining like-kind
exchange treatment for real estate transactions under Section 1031 of the Code.
Georgetown University Law Center Washington, DC; Research Assistant to
Professor Charles Gustafson; Summer 2002.
Edited chapters on source rules; U.S. trade or business income; nonbusiness U.S. source income
and transfer pricing; updated seminar materials for a presentation to international lawyers to
reflect current tax issues; researched cutting edge tax issues.
Mir & Associates LLP Potomac, MD; Associate; 1999-2000.
e
PNC Private Bank Naples, FL; Trust Representative; 6198-12/98.
Young, van Assenderp & Varnadoe Tallahassee, FL; Law Clerk; Summer 1995.
Department of Community Aft'airs Tallahassee, FL; Legal Intern; Summer 1995.
BAR MEMBERSHIPS AND AFFILIATIONS
Bar Membership: State Bar of Florida.
Member: ABA Tax Section.
Florida Bar Tax Section.
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
Collier County Bar Association.
Collier County Women's Bar Association.
India Association of Fort Myers, FL.
Healthy Start Coalition of Southwest Florida, Inc.
Phi Delta Phi.
-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 9F
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 11
,,-
APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OBJECTIVE: To re-appoint 2 members to serve 4-year terms, expiring on June 12,2009, to
the Industrial Development Authority.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier County Industrial Development Authority has 2 terms
expiring on June 12,2005. This 5-member authority was established by the Board of County
Commissioners on February 27,1979 by Resolution No. 79-34 pursuant to State Statues 159,
Part III. This authority has the power to issue Industrial Development Bonds to qualifying
projects. Money generated from the bonds would be used to construct industrial plants,
equipment and other facilities, which would be leased or sold to private industry. The Authority
meets several times a year at irregular intervals. Terms for are 4 years. A list of the current
membership is included in the backup.
The terms for John Agnelli and Ross P. Obley will expire on June 12,2005. A press release was
issued and resumes were received from the following 2 interested citizens:
APPLICANT
DlST
ELECTOR
ADV. COMM.
CURRENTLY SERVING ON
Industrial Development Authority
Educational Facili Authori
Industrial Development Authority
Education Facili Authori
John Agnelli
Yes
Ross P. Obley
2
Yes
,.-..
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: John Agnelli, term expiring on 6/12/09
Ross P. Obley, term expiring on 6/12/09
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment, appoint 2 members, and direct the County Attorney to prepare
a resolution confirming the appointments.
Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
Agenda Date: MAY 10, 2005
.-..
Agenda Item No. 9F
May 10,2005
Page 2 of 11
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
9F
Appointment of members to the Industrial Development Authority.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Sue Filson
Executive Manager to the BCC
4/22120053:31 :38 PM
Board of County
Commissioners
BCC Office
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4/28/2005 1 :02 PM
Agenda Item No. 9F
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 11
DONALD A. PICKWORm, P.A.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
SUITE .502 NEWGATE TOWER
5150 NORTH TAMIAMI TRAIL
SUITE 502
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103
HDBil: DiddawGeartbUnk.nd
(139) 263-8060
FAX (139) 598-Wil
April 18, 2005
Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County
Attn: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Collier County Courthouse, Building"F"
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112-4977
Re: Appointments to Industrial Development Authority
Dear Commissioners and Ms. Filson:
With regard to the re-appointment of our current members John J. Agnelli and Ross P.
Obley to the Industrial Development Authority, we highly recommend these re-appointments.
These members bring many years of experience on the Authority and have proven themselves
to be valuable members and without conflicts of interest.
If you need further information, please give me a call.
;t;~
Donald A. Pickworth
General Counsel and
Assistant Secretary
2OCW.2005
me IoenI J DinIcIon
Chca<rn.-
Thomas E. Con,,,cod,,
Vice Pres.ldent, Governmentol Affoirs
ColI,.r En'.rpri..... Ltd.
a...m- Elect
5l<lp~en L PrICe
Pr"sident & C~iel e.ecutive Office'
FlorK:la Community Bonk
lMmediale Past Chair.....
Ad, io D. Sla,key
Executive VIC,C President, Gutkoost Region
WOChOytD
Ex.utiw DirecIor
Tom""" J. Nemecek
Economic Deve:loprnef\1 CQuncil
01 Collier County
Vice Presiclenb
Todd E. Goles
"'.siden!
Go'e. McVey
David A. Ha<1
'itaP PI.ide"t. Govllrnn~onlol R.lotions
WeJ ComnH"mrties
James A. Warnken
txecuhve Vice Preside-nt
& Chief F; nantlQl Officer
NCH Heof1hcore 5yste",_ h\C
DirecIo<s
Ron Albei.
General Manager
The Reg's''!' fleo;ort & Club
Brad Booz
Chief Financial Officer
Borron Collier Companies
8tJddy W. Brunker
Puhlic Affoi~
Sprint
Co rlos Dial
Pre'iid~nl & Chief E..:ccutivA Offic@r
Gulf Coos, American Fab<icotion
CUlul t. Gfurdin
Ponncr
Girardin, Broan' & Baldwin, LLC
Richo,d C. Gr onl
Presiden,
Grant, f,idkin, Pearsan. Afhon &
CroWl', P."-.
NIC~ola. J. Healy, Jr.
PrEtsidil'tn1
Ave Moria Univer5fty
Scott S. Lowe
Dtrcc:tor of Finonce/Con'rollcr
Cle...lond OiOlc FlOrida Hospital.
Naple.
Timothy R. Por,!, i
Se",,,, Voce Pre5idenl & G.....,rol Courtsel I
Health Management Associates. Inc.. !
Dr. Ric~ard Pegne11et'
Dean, College of Susll1es.s
Florida Gulf Coos' Uni-..'Y
Garrell 5. Rich,.,
President & Chief Exec....ti...e OHicer
Ftrc:t Nct;onol lIo,,1c of ~Ior;cio
Julie A Schmellle
Senior Vice President
tlonk ot Amenca
Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County
Attn: Sue Filson
Executive Manager
Collier County Courthouse. Building"F"
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112-4977
Agenda Item No. 9F
May 10, 2005
=.-
ECONOMICDEVEtOPMENTCCUlCI.
OF CCll.J.8COUN1Y
NAPlfS, FI.OIlIDA
MRGlAOES CfT'I . GOUlEN GATt
IMioAnkA' FF . MAPCO lSL..,At.fO
April 18,2005
3050 North ~ Drive, Sui... 120
Noples, Florida 341 04. USA
Phon", (239) 263-8989
Fox; (239) 263.6021
Toll Fnlc; 1-86b-rNu"It:.
e-mail: edc@.Naple.Florido.com
www.t.NoplesFlorido.com
Re:
Appointments to Industrial Development Authority
Dear Commissioners and Ms. Filson:
The Industrial Development Authority has discussed the re-appointment
of two current members: John J. Agnelli and Ross P. Obley. Both of these
individuals have !;erved the Authority for many years and the Authority relies
heavily on their experience and knowledge. The Industrial Development
Authority is an important adjunct to the work of the Economic Development
Council and the reappointment of these two experienced members maintains
the strength not only of the Authority. but of the EDC.
If you need further information. please give me a call.
Very truly yours,
Tammie Nemecek
President and COO
Agenda Item No. 9F
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 11
Industrial Development Authority
Name W 01'1 Phone Appt'd Exp.. Date Tem
Home Phone Datdle-llppl 2"dExpDate 2"d Term
Ms. Alice J. Carlson OS/26/98 OS/26/02 4 Years
3331 1st Avenue, N.W. 435-3988 09/24/02 09/24106 4 Years
Naples, FL 34120
E-Mail:
District: '/
Category:
Mr. Jack R. Humphrey 643-2020 11/07/95 02/28/99 4 Years
3963 Enterprise Avenue 04/22/03 04113/07 4 Years
Naples, FL 34104
E-Mail:
District: ~
Category:
Ms. Barbara Minch Rosenberg 389-2n1 11/07/95 02128/99 4 Years
5963 Bennuda Lane 592-6199 04/22/03 04/13/07 4 Years
,....-..
Naples, FL 34119
E-Mail:
District: ;J
Category:
Mr. John Agnel~ ,qt(~i ~s. 7?.s~""~f) 02fl8lOO 3 Years
345v5888 06/10/91
a~-~~5'06I12/01 06112/05 4 Years ./"
~ South I1"r II "9rfve
NAplt:;:;, JiL 34193 "3t1I1?-
E-MaU: :rjdo~,,-e"i a>a.ol,('o~
District: /
Category:
Mr. Ross P. Obley . 591-1802 OS/26/98 02/28/01 3 Years
802 Slashpine Court 06/12/01 06/12/05 4 Years /'
Naples, FL 34108
E-MaU:
District: J...
Odegory:
,.--.
Monday, Dec:mrber06, 20fU
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 9F
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 11
----I
I
Industrial Development Authority
Name
Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term
Established on February 27, 1979, by Resolution No. 79-34 pursuant to FL STAT 159, Part III.
This authority is composed of 5 memberS who seNe staggered. 4-year term.. This authority
has the power to sell industrial revenue bonds. Money generated from the bonds would be
used to construct industrial plants. equipment and oIher facilities which would be leased or sold
to private industry.
Tammie Nemecek. Executive Director
Economic Development Council
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 162
Naples, FL 34105
phone: 263-8989 fax: 263-6021
,-'
FL STAT ]S9, Part m
Staff: Don Pickworth, Attorney: 263-8060
Monday, D<<:ember ()6. 2fJ(U
Pllge 2 of 2
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 9F
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 11
DATE:
March 7, 2005
Elections Office & \
Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissio .
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments
The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment
to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are
registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
COMMISSION DISTRICT
John J. Agnelli
373 Bay Meadows Drive
Naples, FL 34113
I
o
Ross P. Obley
802 Slashpine Court
Naples, FL 34108
Thank you for your help.
RECE\VED
MAR 0 8 2005
___ eon..AcfQrl8!S
BoBld of...--
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 9F
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 11
DATE:
March 7, 2005
Attorney Don Pickworth J
Sue Filson, Executive Manager " ~
Board of County Commissio
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Industrial Development Authority
As you know, we currently have vacancies on the above-referenced authority. A press release was
issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this authority to submit a resume for consideration.
I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
John J. Agnelli
373 Bay Meadows Drive
Naples, FL 34113
Ross P. Obley
802 Slashpine Court
Naples, FL 34108
Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment of the authority within the 41
day time-frame (AprillStb), and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration.
Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at
774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 9F
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 11
filson_s
From: Jjagnelti@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 3:04 PM
To: filson_s
Subject: Re: IDA & EFA
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239) 774-8097
Fax: (239) 774-3602
Application for Advisory CommitteeslBoards
Name:_John J. Agnelli
Home Pbone:239-774-3726
Home Address:_373 Bay Meadows Dr. Zip Code:34113
Fu No.239-793~52 BOIinesl Pbonc:239-775-2230 e-mail addrell:jjagneUi@aol.com
Place of Employeement: Power Corporation
Board or Committee Applied for:Industrial Development AuthoritylEducational Facilities Authority
Category (if applicable):
s-pIe: C'___.... DWrid, DewIoper, ~~ lay.....-....
How long bave you lived in Collier County: Vean 33 Months
Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes_X No
Do you currently bold public: office? Yes_X No
Ir 10., wb.t is tIuIt oflke? _Industrial DevelopmeDt AutboritylEdac.tioD" FIIclUties Authority
Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the Law?
If yes, explaiD:
Yes
No_X_
Do you IlOW serve, or h.ve you ever IIerved, OD . CoUier County boud or CUIIImittee? Yes _X_ No
Iryes, pie_list the CUIIIlDitteesIbolU'ds:
Industrial Development Authority & Educational Facilities Authority
Please list your community adivities (civic clubl, neighborhood UIOciatioDl, de. and position. held:
Chair, Board of Tnutees, International CoUege
3/3/2005
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item No. 9F
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 11
Educadon:_Bacbelor of Arts, McMaster Univenity, Hamihon, Ontario, Canada
ExperienceBave lerved on both of the above named Boards for leVeral yean. Have also served on local
Bank boards, YMCA of Collier County Board and otben.
n-ellltlldllll9 ~ iItf~ytlllf- pmilltIItL 1'IIi.r ~".,.1uHtU Hf_tIIRlw s_ rllwOll, ~ M..,. 10
tlte B..4I1fc-.ty c_____, "(II Eat T__ TrtIil, N""., FL 14112. If".. wit., Jll-efu;ytlf#l'"""uc.timt 10
(239)774-3MJ2 or....;I w _flfilr~r.~,.. __ 'l"Uakytlllfor~ w._tIIu_~ IIfClllUtr QIuMy.
John J. Agnelli
<>flr.ce:239-775-2230
Cell: 239-285-0345
3/3/2005
7-19-1995 3:20PM
FROM
Agenda Item No. ~F 1
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 11
Board of County Commissioners
3301 EastTamiamiTnil ~,", ,en
Naples, FL 34112 qr::::\,~.b' , ..
(139) 774-8097
Fax: (139) 774-3602 FFY~
':\(IU' .~
/J Application for Advisory CommitteesIBoards
" 05.> P &8{ c~y HomePhone;;.~9).spI-IUcpz.
t""'"' /: NAPL.4:r
Home Address: 80 2... ..JLAf,ll~/ #~ l. r Zip Code: 3' 7/ / CJ g
591-. ')..rz? /J /J AA
Fu No. Business .Phone: e-mail address; ro,f,rG'"' ,,~~ .A:lVc.. (7 ~
R err/I;) ~b>
Board or Committee Applied for: fIr?JI/ST12/Aft..
Name:
Place ofEmployeement:
7J:va~ovr. -"Aur#'o?/?;y
Ca_ory (if applicable):
F.uIapIa: C:OuuaiaioD niatrict" Dc.dof*", MvSto....raHtt. lay perso.. _
How long ha'Ve you lived in Collier County: Years .2 7
Months
Are YOQ . reeJstered VO.r in CoOler County: Yes ~ No
Do you eurrendy hold pub6c oftice? Yes No /'
If 10, what is that olJke?
Have you ever been convicted of any offense aeainst the Law? Yes
If)'... explaia:
No ~
Do yoa aow serve, or "aye you ever served, on a Collier COllDt)' board oreGJDmittee! Yes V No
If yes, please list tbe COmmlUeeslboards~
-?:f:J2~~A~ ~':f)c~:t~. ~~~~~
\,
Please lisryour comlQunity acti~ities (chic clubs, neichborboocl U8Oclatlons, etc. aad positions
beld: Farr /Z:>&i'Vr:- A/~I'La r,~1PIf!7Z.. lOP.. t."'OMA?tFT2Ct?"":
~%~ff:>::?~*1t ~~~~ ~Oo/ftl~~j';~1J':f"J'
Edueadon: 8 ~ t/u / J/ tJ) /" /J TT f , d,e tS' V
/Y'n/J- AMA:12 / ~AhV L/#/y
~ 3S:~~~~~;;#":5f!rd~~~~~<
-!i~2~~ ~~ _~:7 ;~_~A~~rW~4f/<'
~FY~7 ~~ hJ i71/r AI t:/fl'AY'i?(2/' ry
PIiIG,t#IIIdJ 1lIV'~1 iJJ~~"",,~ TWI ~ diNI4"J~ /1# SlIt ~ IlucMtlHM.....,_
1M B-NI #fC~ C.-,..f~..,.., 33,,1.lr.ut r..-.u TllIiI, N.,w. FL 14112. IfJllHl-la,pl..Hfia~~" tD
~)774-S4n fIr__*,...m-~Jt...,... TIu."";,-Jor'Hll-u.tMt /1# _ _ dIIt,ftu ~c.a.r ~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10,2005
Page 1 of 16
.-."
APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
OBJECTIVE: To appoint I member to fulfill the remainder of a vacant term, expiring on April
21, 2006, to the Tourist Development Council.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Tourist Development Council has 1 vacancy, representing the
Owner/Operator Category, due to a resignation. This 9 member council was established by
Ordinance No. 92-18 as an advisory committee to make recommendations to the Board of
County Commissioners regarding a proposed plan of uses for tourist development tax revenues,
for the effective operation of the special projects or uses of the tourist development tax revenues,
and to review all expenditures of revenues from the tourist development trust fund. This council
consists of the Chairman or designated representative of the Board of County Commissioners, 2
elected municipal officials, 3 owners or operators of motels, hotels, recreational vehicle parks, or
other tourist accommodations in the county and subject to the tourist tax, 3 individuals involved
in the tourist industry who have demonstrated an interest in tourist development, but who are not
owners or operators of motels, hotels or other tourist accommodations. The council shaII meet at
least once each quarter. Terms are 4 years. A list of the current membership is included in the
backup.
Mr. Kevin M. Durkin resigned on February 25, 2005. A press release was issued and resumes
were received from the following 2 interested citizens:
->,
APPLICANT
CATEGORY
DlST ELECTOR ADV. COMM.
None
None
Clark Wakefield Hill
Ronald Albeit
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Tourist Development Council moved to
recommend and support both applicants, with an emphasis towards Clark Wakefield Hill.
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: NONE
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment, appoint I member, and direct the County Attorney to prepare
a resolution confirming the appointments.
Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
Agenda Date: MAY 10,2005
r~
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 16
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
9G
Meeting Date
Appointment of member to the Tourist Development Council.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Sue Filson
Executive Manager to the BCC
4/22/20053:31:38 PM
Board of County
Commissioners
BCC Office
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4/27/20054:33 PM
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page3of16
Tourist Development Council
Name Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-oppt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term
Chairman Fred Coyle 774-8097 01/11105 01/10/06 1 Year
330] E. Tamiami Trail
Nap]es. FL 34]]2
E-Mail: fredcoyle@colJiergov.net
District: 4
CtUegory: BCC Chairman
Councilman John F. Sorey 434-4601 03/09/04 04/21/08 4 Years
735 Eighth Street South
Naples. FL 34] 02
E-Mail: council@naplesgov.com
District: 4
CtUegory: Municipal Officer - City of Naples
Mr. E. G]enn Tucker 389-5000 05/02/00 04/2] /04 4 Years
50 Bald Eagle Drive. Suite 204 03/23/04 04121/08 4 Years
Marco Island. FL 34145
E-Mail: friartuck3725@cs.com
District: I
CtUegory: Municipal Official - Marco Island
Mr. Douglas House 695-4400 04/13/04 04121/08 4 Years
408 Buckner A venue 695-3762
Everglades City. FL 34139
E-Mail:
District: 5
CtUegory: Owner/Operator
Mr. Robert J. Dictor 642-2600 03/11103 04/21/07 4 Years
14] Gul1Port Court 389-2638
Marco Island. FL 34145
E-Mail: robert.dictor@marriott.com
District: 1
CtUegory: Owner/Operator
Page 1 of3
.,
WNnesd4y, April 27, 21J05
.'~""""""'-""--"~-""'~";~~'~'.~~' ~~-~~ ''''j. ~...
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 16
Tourist Development Council
Name Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ntlExpDote 2nd Term
Mr. David Loving 649-7455 03/11/03 04/21/07 4 Years
P.O. Box 619 695-0656
Everglades City, FL 34139
E-Mail: epl401@aol.com
District: 5
Category: Municipal- Everglades City
Mr. Murray H. Hendel 04/13/04 04/21108 4 Years
4301 Gulf Shore Boulevard 262-0738
Naples, FL 34103
E-Mail: murrp2h@aol.com
District: 4
Category: Non-Owner/Operato~
'OV'~
Mr. Kevin M. Durkin~.e~..~ 455-1010 02/08/00 04/21/02 2 Years
101 Debron Drive '}..~ 03/26/02 04/21/06 4 Years
Naples, FL 34112
E-Mail: kmdnaples@aoloom
District: 1
Category: Owner/Operator
Ms. Susan M. Becker 03/26/02 04/21/06 4 Years
371 Eleventh A venue South 261-7708
Naples, FL 34102
E-Mail: sssbecker@msn.oom
District: 4
Category: Non-Owner/Operator
........~r.___....,
...,.~...~~"...'" ,......,..~."~....
~~"'...r.'...'....._lI;~-".'.--.-'
Wedn5diq, .4pril27, 2(J(J5
Page20fJ
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 16
Tourist Development Council
Name
Work Phone
Home Phone
Appt'd Exp. Date
DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate
Term
2nd Term
This 9 member council was created on March 23, 1992 by Ord. No. 92-18 to make
recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners regarding a proposed plan of uses for
tourist development tax revenues, for the effective operation of the special projects or uses of
the tourist development tax revenues, and to review all expenditures of revenues from the
tourist development trust fund. Membership consist of the Chainnan of the BCC, 3
owner/operators, 3 non-owner/operators and 2 elected municipal officials. Tenns are 4 years.
NOTE: BCC adpoted Ord. 2()()()..44 on 6/27/00 as follows: ''The City of Everglades and the
City of Marco Island shall alternate as the second municipal member. In the event that other
municipalities are legally created in Collier County, then those municipalities shall be included
in the rotation process for the second municipal seat.
On 9-21-G4 the BCC approved Ord. No. 2004-57 to reduce membership to 9 members, deleting
non-voting technical advisor.
Reso 2002-226 adopted on 5-14-02 permitting municipalities to recommend roc appointees,
with membership consisting of Chainnan of BCC, 3 municipal representatives, 3
owner/operators and 2 nonowner/operators.
On 9-21-G4 BCC adopted Ord 2004-57 deleting the non-voting member with professional
aVnArionl""'A in "ho nrft....,,""..^1"II '-II"'" ......'3r1roHnn "f ~~~I O1I'Ontco.
FL STAT 125.0104
Staff: Gail Hambright, Administrative Assistant: 403-2384
Wed1usdily. April 27, 2005
.......>."'.~~~,~....._.~-,,_...., .- ..........~.''>...,~...,~~..,'
Ptllfe j of j
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 16
Naples @
Marco Island
;:::::::- - ~
Everglades
PAA"'OISL COAS'"
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Sue Filson, Executive Manager
Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
Jack Wert, Director
Naples, Marco Island, Everglades CVB
DATE:
April 25, 2005
SUBJECT:
Tourist Development Council Vacancy
At the April 25, 2005 Tourist Development Council (TDC) meeting the
two applicants for the TDC Owner/Operator vacancy were reviewed
and the following recommendation was made:
Moved to support and recommend both applicants, Clark Hill and
Ronald Albeit, for the vacant Owner/Operator position on the TDC to
the Board of County Commissioners. The TDC members felt that both
candidates are well qualified, and they indicated an emphasis on Mr.
Hill because he represents a medium sized inland property that would
give balance to the hotel representatives on the TDC between a large
beach resort and a smallloeally owned motel.
This motion was approved 3 to 2.
Convention &: Visiton Bureau
3050 N. Horseslloe Drive *211, Naples, FI 34104
T (239) 403-2384 · F (239) 403-2404
Web site www.elusicOorida.eoDl
'0
a
u
a
i
...
u
c:r::
:s
~ =
.., a a
lS · u
4Ia.e _
~~-
of!; ... !
o ;
c:r::
~...
III 0
u_
'0 ...
- u
..,-
~~
10
o
o
N
en
.....
z
c(
(.)
::i
0.
0.
c(
o
c
.....
~
a
:::I
o
...
.
.lIll
...
.
=
ii
a
~
-
.
...
:::I
'0
~
j
-
.
...
5
ii
:::I
0'
..,
u
>
..,
u
>
.
.e
-
III
III
o
...
...
<
I
rI3
=I
U'
u
III
.
III
E
ii
a
~
-
.
e
u
-
a
-
I
<
=
::E
.
ii
...
u
~ ..
eta
i :
o ·
=::E
...
o
....
.
..
u
C.
o
1:
u
a
~
o
-
]
=<
"Cl
ii
a
o
""
-
a
u
a
ta
.
III
.
::E
i~
"Q ..--
a- a
. ~ =
.III. a
.!!..!!~
u,u
11lli
. _ a
1: =--;
o z; :
l.crc.
"" III ...
tou Ii
-....!a
.!I~.o
If"i) b .!3
-_..-
.... 0 ..=
I==.!
....Cl0.
U u;l ...
r-~8.
III U " ..
.=c.o
::E ... 0 ...
_Bt:rE
_ - 0 a
... ~ .. 0
uuu;
a.....
4It"Q_-
e~iie
.III
III
U
..
1:U'if
o tI u
I u a
c:r::~:'t:
a a _ 0
o 0 a ..
_ u _ u
~"a~
-i:2;1
8 a.!!'"
= _ ~ 0
']1~
.. ...Ii'
u u u OIl
='e 1Il.e
:oilS
~-~e
of!;geMl
15 ~ ... ~
.....!=
-S;:o.!!.
-.!I.IIIa
= t---
..!,=a
~1Il8.$3
OCIJ --;
c:r::le~
.
.Cl
..
I ~
.III~
.!:a
u.
.. 0
t:El.Cl
o e :
I . u
llii: e-oo
a ... .::
oc..
- ~ 0
III t u
r:Ii 01 ~
..~
~ :: ~
=a.Cl
101:
t!.!f
=11I-
e ; .
'iu15:s
c U - a
u=~u
_o~a
III .. 0 !
~"Ealll
- !, ~.III
:: III 0 ..
< .d: :;
.
ellS OIl
1: .!
o u -
.. N a
u ~ 1:1
c:r:: ii~$3
15.!::~
-.:!~"21o
,; -! ~L! ~
REl:!'O!,
=1;;;=
1.-1"
....Cli:..
u... -
= = .. e e
f.D.:J.....
a.:!:.!!
o I = 10 ...
U S ~ !,1
:'u:li~.
- ~ ..- .
~:S .S B
==~..!
"8..=-
=I"':.i:'
110 to";. ta
1.~~~e.=
= u a ~ ..
-~Ouu
Cl;,U.!El.lll~
.
....
...0....
S'Eo'"
~.~J!
..0-=
_=80
=.=u
'0 0 _ c:a.
.,,::ICJ:a
...5.-
. SIt :::I ...
0;;0':
=..,u_
..<_u
~... .a ~
.!.!i.=
El · i';::
.1- 0
.Cl~=u
U...u-
"~I:I I
~-u-a
c:a..! - .
~=oEl=.
.... 0-
"~15.
;!IlIU~
'01"-':
...ur!ea
.!tSSe
a=i:i:.
. - ... ... =
::E~S=.t
.
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Pa9 7 of 16
10
U
.III
El
u
::E
'0
..
.
o
=
1:1
.
u
..
III
=
..
o
-
-;;
;>
I
c.
.
Z;
.
.-
... ... ..
i.e)
~\.s:
!~ I
o~ ..
~oa
i@:t:
iH
'15"1
In
igE
Ii I
c:i.e
alJ
!:i
.eo.
)~.Q
I;='
:~ji _
:iJ !
.. oS !lJ
ii a:.
;.ei
.Q_::s
11:
Ii
il &:
il!j
.e':U)
.....,!!
e~s
oi.s:
~i!
I~.e
i Q....
fo fl
. eo
:glic:
.;!:s~
-;.1
8 ==
c:o.
...c:S
t 1'15
0:21
~ee.
.. Q.::S
Q.
a
_ 0
a;
u _
.. c.
... III
= U
Uu
o
to
o
01
U
-
..
U
~
Eo-
u
....
. u
:5! a
'0 ..
:z
U
-
a
..
..
=
S
I
""
..
'ii
'S
=
.!
t
...
01
U
1:1
.!
.
u
!
<
.
.
"Cl
=
u
e
e
o
u
u
~
...
-
8 =
.!l = ..
U III e
u.! e
""""Cl-
oeo .. :.
o ;
~
<:l ..
= 0
u_
"Cl u
"- u
::-
~~
an
o
o
N
qJ
I-
Z
~
o
:J
a..
a..
cc:
o
C
I-
"Cl
=
::I
e
u
.11II
u
-
=
..
.;
-
-
~
"Cl
~
'j;J
=
=
:::
-
u
5
..
::I
0'
...
u
~
::
~
VI
....
0\
-
=
o
:::
III
..
-
..
-;
.i
~
i
II
";;
::I
=
,.
e
III
.c
-
~
...
=
~
c
1t
-;
;;;l
.
::
'C.1:
.. - ..
....Z~
.. · = =
u-=~
ClIIl_"Cl
r~ .: == III
_oeo _
..
.s
e
u
c.
~
..
<II
a
it
o
-
-
i
.11II
..
-
o
VI
0\
0\
....
..:
o
e
-
..
.;
"s
"Cl
-<
u
li
=
"Cl
u
c
1:
..
u
-e
I
=
...
~
u
e
e
=
u
';
..
.!
e
III
..t:
U
...
u
'C.
III
Z
.. ..
.!..8
: e
.. u
Cl e
-
... :I
u-",
!! .c
1"'::
~ CI _
--..
....0.
-=~
u",_
li _.!!
=8'1
.t':2 El
CI r: l!I
::1&..:::;
~ 0.. .~
..8S
u-o
=>'"
o.,,"Cl
u..a
.. . .
_0",11'I
==0=
... .00
!=~'"
o..:::a"Cl
- ... CI
I - ." III
"'~";;....
g:eg
N-<o..",
.
III
El
.!
.!! ..
< I
tt=
~1
.!lo..
.-
::I ·
= i
~ ...
u .
= -
i =
=:le
::1-
= a
! i
_1::
- III
=c.
'" u
ool:l
0\ _
--
~ ..
....:s!
0\ U
.... ..t:
.
Z 0 C .11II
~ ... "
.!'l '1 ~ !
..t: ~'1 ".
=-..Z r: ..: ..
1.!E:i~; js
'1iIAu":{!. ,g
.. t:::a.': .. - ~
~e<r;!lu c
"CooS ~= u
t.; i=u ~o
is . Co- u li
uiJ:::;== ~
u.!<~i:: ....
li:!:!..;v- J
=u"EfI1f11j_t
"-So:3:3"Cl:2z';
1,; a__ 8 ~ ..C
8..::'::~~~E.s.!
uua";";u =r.
_ :!=- l!l r!=.z
Cla_ooi5u_ij
X -==== ~.'a.
e'1;&ooO\O\:I!I-
o....O\I~~..;..Z
1..----r.O"i
N=~~.~ o...:l
oouoooooo~ ~=
~Cl~~~.... -=
.
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 16
-.
.... ... '"
loR)
&30$
· IE! t8.
~~
~Oa
iell::
~ ~ I!
u;
~11
ii~
!l).!
Iii
c::'i.e
811
lIt
.eo.
)....oQ
~;=.
=:!'i
~iii.
.SErf
'Iii
es.c:
t-i
ell
Ili
"di~
02.CI)
i~i
ois
"oi~
Hi
=;111
~s';!
II~
81==
iJI
~l-O
o~ I
~ ~:a
Q.
=
- =
a-
e~
.. =-
::I ::I
U 8
o
~
fD
u
-
.
u
u
=
~
.!
. U
:s! S
.".
:z
u
.
.
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 16
RECEIVED
MAR J 0 2005
BoarcfOfcounly~
DATE: March 28. 2005
TO: Elections Office
FROM: Sue Filson. Executive
Board of County Commissio
RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments
The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment
to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are
registered voters in Collier County.
Also. please list the commission district in which each applicant resides.
TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
COMMISSION DISTRICT
Clark Wakefield Hill
15515 Cedarwood Lane. #102
Naples, FL 34110
Ronald Albeit
1919 Timberline Drive
Naples. FL 34119
c:R
cR
Thank you for your help.
MEMORANPUM
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 16
TO:
March 28, 2005
Gail Hambright, Tourism ~
Sue Filson, Executive Manag ·
Board of County Commissio
DATE:
FROM:
RE:
Tourist Development Council
As you know, we currently have a vacancy on the above-referenced advisory conunittee. A press
release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for
consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
Clark Wakefield Hill
15515 Cedarwood Lane, #102
Naples, FL 34110
Ronald Albeit
1919 Timberline Drive
Naples, FL 34119
Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment of the advisory committee
within the 41 day time-frame (May 9, 2005), and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's
consideration. Please categorize the app6eaa" iD areas of expertise. If you have any questions,
please call me at 774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
filson_s
.m:
advisolYboards@colllergoy.net
Sent: Thursday, March 10,200512:31 PM
To: filson_s
Subject: New On-line AdvisolY Board Application Submitted.
~
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Tel: (239) 774-3602
Fax: (239) 774-3602
March 10, 2005
Application for Advisory Committees I Boards
Name: ClarK Wakefield Hill Home Phone: 239-596-5076
Home Address: 15515 Cedarwood Lane 102
e
City: Naples Zip Code: 34110
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 16
A-t~1 .~,~
'f(~. . ~. ~.:'
. . "
.~ '. - ;.." ~ ,.'
Fax Number: 239-659-3114 Business Phone: 239-430-4900
Email Address:chill@cooperhotels.com
Place of Employment: Hilton Naples
How long have you lived in Collier County? 5-10 years
Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the law? No
Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes
Board I Committee Applied for: Tourist Development Council
Category: (if applicable) No information provided.
-
Do you currently hold public office? No
3/10/2005
~
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 16
e
Do you now serve, or have you served on a
Collier County board or committee?
No
Pie.. list your community activities:
Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce, Board Member,
2002 - Present Collier County Hotel & lodging
Association: Vice President 2000 and 2001 President
2002 and 2003 Immediate Past President 2004 and 2005
Education:
Business Administration, University of Alabama, 1971 -
1975 Certified Hotel Administrator 1995 - Present
.--
Experience 1 Background:
1975 -1982 Hilton Huntsville, Huntsville, AL Held all
Department Management Positions. 1982 - Present
Cooper Hotel Company, MemphisTN General Manager for
the following properties: 1982-1983 Hilton Knoxville
Airport, Alcoa, TN 1983-1988 Holiday Inn St. Charles, St.
Charles, MO 1988-1999 Holiday 1m Select Bell Tower, Ft.
Myers, FL 1995-1999 Homewood Suites Hotel Bell Tower,
Ft. Myers, FL 1999-Present Hilton Naples&
TowerslShula's Steak House, Naples, FL
e
3/10/2005
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 13 of 16
filson s
.m:-
advisoryboards@colllergoY.net
Sent: Wednesday. March 02, 2005 4:47 PM
To: filson_s
Subject: New On-line AdvisolY Board Application Submitted.
~
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Tel: (239) 774-3602
Fax: (239) 774-3&02
,~~?
~Pf'
March 02, 2005
Application for Advisory Committees J Boards
Name: Ronald Albeit Home Phone: 239-596-9455
Home Address: 1919 Timbertine Drive
e
City: Naples Zip Code: 34119
Fax Number: 239-597-3128 Business Phone: 239-594~1
Email Address:ralbeit@naplesresort.com
Place of Employment: The Registry Resort & Club & Edgewater
Beach Hotel & Club
How long have you lived in Collier County? 5-10 years
Have you ever been convicted of any offense against the law? No
Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes
Board I Committee Applied for: Tourist Development Council
Category: (if applicable) Owner/Operator
-
Do you currently hold public office? No
3/2/2005
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 16
e
Do you now serve, or have you served on a Yes
Collier County board or committee?
If yes, please list the boards I committees:
Naples Visitors Bureau, Greater Naples Chamber of
Commerce Board of Directors, Collier County Hotel &
Lodging Association Board of Directors, Economic
Development Council Board of Directors
Please list your community activities:
Florida Gulf Coast University - Resort Hospitality Advisory
Board Florida Gulf Coast University - Adjunct Professor
Education:
MBA, International Finance, B.S. Accounting (Lynn
University), Associates Degree in Hotel & Restaurant
Management (New York State University)
--
Experience I Background:
Area General Manager - Registry Resort & Club,
Edgewater Beach Hotel & Club. Lead and direct all resort
operations, strategic plaming, community relations,
corporate liason. Rooms Division Manager - Boca Raton
Resort and Club. Supervise Front Office, Bell Desk &
Concierge. Responsible for yield management, welcoming
and greeting VIP's of the resort. Controller - Boca Raton
Resort and Club. Supervise accounting managers, control
and manage company cash, responsible for safeguarding
company assets, sign checks. Assistant Controller - Boca
Raton Resort and Club. Supervise accounting managers,
prepare monthly cash flow projections, sign checks,
control cash disbursements. Food & Beverage Controller-
Boca Raton Resort & Club. Responsible to establish and
maintain inventory, safeguard assets, reconcile and
analyze monthly inventory, perform audits of food and
beverage systems and controls, supervise accounting
clerKs.
e
3/2/2005
e
e
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10,2005
Page 15 of 16
e
CONTACT:
Tracy Southers. (239) 594-6017, tsouthers@naplesresort.com
Lourdes Diaz, (305) 533-]] I], lourdes@msilver-pr.com
RON ALBEIT APPOINTED AREA GENERAL MANAGER,
THE REGISTRY RESORT AND EDGEW A TER BEACH HOTEL
NAPLES, Fla. - December 29, 2004 - The Blackstone Group bas named Ron Albeit area general
manager of The Registry Resort & Club and Edgewater Beach Hotel & Club.
Albeit brings more than 25 years of experience to The Registry Resort & Club and its sister property,
Edgewater Beach Hotel & Club. As area general manager, Albeit will focus on daily operations,
capital enhancement projects, resort marketing, and financial developments for both hotels. Albeit
became general manager of The Registry Resort & Club in 1999 after 20 years at the Boca Raton
Resort and Club.
His appointment comes as Boca Resorts, Inc. (BRI) was recently acquired by an affiliate of The
Blackstone Group, a private investment firm with a history of significantly reinvesting in their assets
and dramatically improving services and facilities.
Albeit began his career with Hilton Hotels Corporation in food and beverage purchasing, he opened the
New Orleans Hikon, then moved to South Florida to join the BRI team. Albeit is a graduate from Lynn
University in Boca Raton, Florida, where he earned a masters degree in international finance and a
bachelors degree in accounting. He also holds an associates degree in hotel and restaurant
management from New York State University.
Albeit serves on the board of directors for the Economic Development Council of Collier County,
advisory board of Leadership Collier, steering committee for Florida Gulf Coast University's Resort
and Hospitality School, and holds an adjunct teaching position at Florida Gulf Coast University.
Located in the heart of Naples on Southwest Florida's Paradise Coast, The Registry Resort & Club is
one of Florida's premier resort experiences with 395 luxuriously appointed rooms, 29 tower suites and
49 garden villas. Situated alongside a scenic mangrove preserve and the white-sand beaches of the
Gulf of Mexico, the resort offers a selection of amenities and activities, including a new themed pool
area with a Mangrove Mountain waterslide, championship golf at its own Naples Grande Golf Club,
award-winning tennis, fitness center, the new Zen-inspired Sanctuary spa facility, a selection of water
sports, and conference and special events facilities with two ballrooms and 25 executive boardrooms.
The resort features acclaimed dining, from casual to elegant, and the Camp Registry program with
supervised children's programs and activities for the entire fimilly.
- more -
e
--
e
Agenda Item No. 9G
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 16
Albeit Appointment
Page 2 of2
Edgewater Beach Hotel & Club is the only all-suite beachfront hotel in Naples, Florida. Club-like
warmth and gracious traditions welcome guests to this general hideaway located directly on seven
miles of pristine beach along Florida's Gulf Coast. Edgewater's 125 luxury suites surround a flower-
ftlled tropical courtyard and heated pool On-site amenities include the newly renovated Club Dining
Room and Club Cocktail Lounge, The Market on Gulf Shore, an al ftesco cafe and poolside bar, fitness
center, water sports, and beach services. Golfis accessible at the Edgewater's private Naples Grande
Golf Club.
The Registry Resort & Club and Edgewater Beach Hotel & Club are members of the Boca Resorts
Collection including The Boca Raton Resort & Club, Naples Grande Golf Club, Grande Oaks Golf
Club, Hyatt Regency Pier Sixty-Six and Radisson Bahia Mar Beach Resort. For reservations and
information contact The Registry Resort & Club at 800.247.9810 or direct at 239.597.3232 or consult
the Internet at www.registryresort.com.
About The Blackstone GrouD
The Blackstone Group, a private investment firm with offices in New York, Boston, Atlanta, London,
Hamburg and Paris, was founded in 1985. Blackstone's Real Estate Group has raised five funds,
representing over $6 billion in total equity, and has a long track record of investing in hotels and other
commercial properties. In addition to Real Estate, The Blackstone Group's core businesses include
Private Equity, Corporate Debt Investing, Marketable Ahemative Asset Management, Mergers and
Acquisitions Advisory and Restructuring and Reorganization Advisory. The Blackstone Group can be
accessed on the Internet at http://www.Blackstone.com.
###
Agenda Item No. 108
May 10,2005
Page 1 of 20
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve separate Developer Contribution Agreements with
Wal Mart/Gateway, WCI Communities, Inc., and Rimar Inc. to design and
construct six lane improvements on SR 951 from US 41 south to north of Henderson
Creek in conjunction with the County's current six laning project from US 41 to
Davis Boulevard
OBJECTIVE: To obtain BCC approval of three separate Developer Contribution
Agreements attached to this Executive Summary to design and construct six lane
improvements on SR 951 from US 41 to north of Henderson Creek for an estimated
distance of .5 mile. The three Developers involved have agreed to donate the design and
construction costs for this project that is currently estimated at $1,644,000 ($1,500,000
for construction and $144,000 for design to be constructed within the existing right-of-
way). The design money will be paid to the County within 30 days to include this
segment within the County's current design project on CR 951 from US 41 to Davis
Boulevard. A letter of credit will be provided for the construction funding within 30 days
and the money will be provided within one year in time for the construction of this
project. Currently this segment of SR 951 is over capacity based on the County's
Transportation Concurrency Management System and none of these developments can go
forward at this time without making this improvement. Securing the funding for this
project accelerates the needed widening of SR 951 south of US 41, which is included in
the MPO's Long Range Transportation Needs Plan, but is not currently funded within the
State's Transportation Improvement Program.
CONSIDERATIONS: The segment of SR 951 from US 41 south to Manatee Road is
currently over capacity mainly due to the constriction of four lanes at the US 41
intersection, During the Annual Update Inventory Report workshop in December, staff
indicated that a way to accelerate the need for additional capacity in this area was to
continue the six laning that is currently programmed from Davis Boulevard to US 41
further south. This is estimated to add 480 peak hour peak direction trips with an
additional lane through the US 411CR 951 intersection extending south down in front of
the Wal Mart/Gateway property. The number of peak hour peak direction trips produced
by these developments is projected to be 300 peak hour peak direction trips. Based on
this, staff worked with the proposed Developer representatives to come up with a
proposal to design and construct the six lane improvements.
The three Developers are Wal Mart/Gateway, WCI Communities, Inc. (Lands End) and
Rimar Inc. who through the attached agreements have combined to fund the project
above and beyond their impact fees. Wal Mart/Gateway is donating $ I ,098,996 above
and beyond impact fees. In addition, Wal Mart/Gateway will pay 50% of their impact
fees estimated to be $ I ,200,000 at the earlier date of February 10, 2006 or site plan
approval. WCI Communities is donating $274,749 towards the design and construction
above and beyond impact fees. In addition, WCI Communities, Inc, will pay 50% of their
impact fees estimated at $2,000,000 at the earlier date of February 10, 2006 or site plan
".."'.""
Agenda Item No. 108
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 20
,,.---
approval. Finally, Rimar Inc. is also donating $274,749 towards the design and
construction of the six lanes above and beyond impact fees. In addition, Rimar Inc. will
pay 50% of their impact fees estimated at $904,750 at the earlier date of February 10
2006 or site plan approval. The impact fees to be paid by February 10, 2006 are timed
specifically to be available for the construction of the segment of Collier Boulevard from
Davis Boulevard to US 41.
FISCAL IMPACT: The design and construction costs (estimated at $1,644,000) for this
roadway improvement are being provided by the Developers. The agreement includes a
provision for the actual design cost to be paid by the developers with any excess payment
refunded or any shortage to be made up by them. Conversely, the Construction cost
estimate is fixed in the agreement and if the construction cost ends up being above the
$1,500,000 estimate the County will be the responsible to make up the difference.
Conversely, if the construction cost comes in less than $1,500,000, the County will keep
the excess money for use in future projects.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The six laning of this segment of SR 951 is
consistent with the GMP and is consistent with the MPO's Long Range Transportation
Needs Plan.
--
RECOMMENDATION: That the BCC approve these Developer Contribution
Agreements to fund the six laning of SR 951 from US 41 south to north of Henderson
Creek.
PREPARED BY: Donald Scott, Transportation Planning Director
05-MGR-00054/4
~'
Agenda Item No 106
May 10,2005
Page :l of 20
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
lOB
Rec.ommendation to approve a Developers Contribution Agreement with Wal Mart. wel
Communities, Inc.. and Stonebreak Homes LlC to design and construct six lane
improvements on SR 95"' from US 41 south to north of Henderson Creek. in advance of
and 85 an extension to the County's current sir. laning project from US 41 to Davis
Boulevard. (Norman Feder. Administrator, Transportation Services)
Meeting Dati
5110/20059,0000 AM
Approved By
Nonn E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Division Administrator
Dat.
Transporiion SelVkli'1O
T'r.ansportation SC!'.....ices Admin.
4114/20054:43 PM
Approved By
Sharon Newman
Accounting SuptlTvisor
Daw
Transportion Stlrvices
TnmsportatKm Administration
4/19/20051:23 PM
Approved By
Pa.t Lehnhard
Executive Secretary
Date
Transport.ltion SeNices
Transportation Ser\'ices Admin
41281200501:49 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Admitli$tr;~tiYe AlOsh.tant
Date
county Ma.nager's Office
Office of M;lnilgement & Budget
4/29/20057:45 AM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
AS!listant County Attorney
Date
County Attomey
County AttDrn~y Office
"'2912005 2:32 PM
Approved By
Mark Is.acho"
Budget AnalY$t
Oat.
County Manager's Offic.e
Office of Management & Budgl!'1
5/Z12005 5:53 PM
Approved By
Miduml Smykowtoki
M.UUluemel)t &. Budget Oiree:tor
Dot.
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
51312005 1 :32 PM
Approved By
James V, Mudd
COllnty Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's. Office
513/20057 :3$ PM
Agenda Item No. 10B
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 20
AGREEMENf
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this _ of May, 2005
(the "Effective Date"), by and between GA TEW A Y SHOPPES II, LLC, an Indiana limited
liability company (hereinafter referred to as the "Gateway"), W AL-MART STORES, INC
(hereinafter referred to as "Wal-Mart") and THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY
(hereinafter referred to as "County").
R E C I TAL S:
WHEREAS, Gateway owns certain lands described in Exhibit "A" (hereinafter referred
to as the "Parcel") attached hereto and incorporated herein by referenced; and
WHEREAS, Gateway has a contract to sell the Parcel to Wal-Mart; and
WHEREAS, Wal-Mart is processing development plans for development of the Parcel,
referred to by the County as SDP AR 550 I (the "Development"); and
WHEREAS, the Parcel accesses Collier Boulevard (CR. 951), which road County is in
the process of widening to six lanes ("Road Project") using the services of the engineering firm
of CH2M Hill, Inc. ("CH2M Hill") as the Project Engineers for the design and construction of
the Road Project; and
WHEREAS, County has represented that due to the level of service on Collier Boulevard
(CR. 951), that absent adding an additional segment along Collier Boulevard to this Road
Project from U.S. 41 to Henderson Creek Drive (the "Added Portion"), the Development does
not satisfy concurrency requirements; and
WHEREAS, to induce County to design and construct the Added Portion, thereby
creating concurrency for its Development, Gateway and Wal-Mart have agreed to pay, at
different times set forth below, (1) two-thirds of the design fees for the Added Portion ("Design
Costs"), in the estimated amount of$98,966.00, (2) two-thirds of the construction for the Added
Portion, in the estimated amount of $1 ,000,000.00 ("Construction Costs"), and (3) one-half of all
road impact fees estimated to be due for all authorized development; and
WHEREAS, prior to committing to pay County these funds, Gateway and Wal-Mart
would like assurance that County will reserve sufficient road capacity for the Development; and
WHEREAS, Collier County Land Development Code Section 1O.02.07CA,f provides
that Traffic Capacity Reservation for all or part of a proposed development may be approved and
secured at application pending approval of the final sub-division plat, site development plan or
building permit upon acceptance of a Traffic Impact Statement ("TIS") by the Transportation
Administrator; and
Agenda Item No. 10B
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 20
WHEREAS, the Transportation Administrator has reviewed and accepted Gateway and
Wal-Mart 's TIS, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B"; and
WHEREAS, based upon this TIS, together with the consideration set forth in this
Agreement, the Transportation Administrator has agreed to reserve sufficient Traffic Capacity
Reservation for the Development; and
WHEREAS, Gateway, Wal-Mart and County respectively acknowledge and represent
that each has the full power and authority to enter into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, after reasoned consideration by the Board of County Commissioners, the
Board finds that this Agreement is in the public interest.
WIT N E SSE T H:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable
consideration exchanged amongst the parties, and in consideration of the covenants contained
herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. All of the above RECITALS are true and correct and are hereby expressly
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth fully below, and all Exhibits referenced herein are
made a part of this Agreement.
2. Gateway or Wal-Mart will contribute and pay the Design Costs in the amount of
$98,996.00 (2/3 ofCH2M Hill's Fee Schedule for same) within thirty days of the Effective Date.
Gateway and Wal-Mart shall not be responsible for the cost of the design of any other aspects of
the Road Project. The Fee Schedule prepared by CH2M Hill is set forth in Exhibit "B". Wal-
Mart or Gateway shall pay for 2/3 of any reasonable increase in the Design Costs within thirty
days after receipt of a written request for payment with supporting documentation from County.
County shall refund to Gateway or Wal-Mart any monies collected from Gateway or Wal-Mart
for the Design Costs not utilized within thirty days of acceptance of the road construction by
County. Gateway and Wal-Mart agree that any dispute it may have with respect to the Design
Cost will be addressed to CH2M Hill or County's selected contractor, as applicable, but not with
County.
3. Wal-Mart or Gateway will contribute and pay its share of the Construction Costs
in the amount of $1,000,000.00, Wal-Mart and Gateway shall not be responsible for the cost of
the construction of any other aspects of the Road Project, or any costs of construction in excess
of $1,000,000.00. Within thirty days of the Effective Date, Wal-Mart or Gateway will post a
letter of credit suitable to County with County to secure payment of this sum. Within the earlier
of one year from the Effective Date, or thirty days prior to commencement of the Road Project,
Wal-Mart or Gateway shall pay County the sum of $1,000,000.00.
4. Within 30 days from receipt of the $98,996.00 payment and $ 1,000,000.00 letter of
credit set forth above, the Transportation Administrator will notifY Wal-Mart and Gateway that
County has reserved sufficient traffic capacity for the Development. This reservation is subject
to immediate rescission upon Wal-Mart or Gateway not timely meeting any payment set forth
2
Agenda Item No. 108
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 20
above, This reservation of sufficient traffic capacity will expire one year following the Effective
Date of this Agreement.
5. On or before February] 0, 2006, Wal-Mart or Gateway shall obtain a certificate of
public facility adequacy ("Certificate") for roads for all development density and intensity
authorized by the Development by prepaying to the County one-half of the road impact fees
estimated to be due for all authorized development. It is estimated that this prepayment ("Road
Impact Fee Prepayment") will be at least $ ] .200.000,00. Payment of these fees vests the
development entitlements for which the Certificate applies on a continuous basis for three years
unless otherwise relinquished. This initial 50 percent impact fee payment is non-refundable
after payment and receipt of the Certificate.
6. Not later than 90 days prior to the expiration of the three year period for the
Certificate, the County shall notify Wal-Mart and Gateway via registered mail of the remaining
balance due for the estimated transportation impact fees up to 50 percent, based on level of
building permits already issued. The balance of the impact fees due will be calculated at the rate
schedule then currently applicable. Wal-Mart and Gateway may elect to pay the balance of the
estimated transportation impact fees for the entitlements for which the Certificate applies or
modify the Certificate to a lesser entitlement and calculate the balance of the transportation
impact fees on the revised entitlements. The Certificate shall be modified to include only the
entitlements for which the estimated transportation impact fees are paid. Once the balance of the
estimated transportation impact fees are paid, those estimated fees are non-refundable. The
Certificate runs continuously with the land in perpetuity after all estimated transportation impact
fees have been paid. As building permits are drawn down on the entitlements, the estimated
transportation impact fees already paid shall be debited at the rate of the impact fees in effect at
the time of utilization. It shall be Wal-Mart and Gateway's or a subsequent record titleholder's
(of all or a portion of the Property; i.e. lot/tract purchaser) obligation to notify the County that a
credit is available, each time a building permit is applied for. If the estimated transportation
impact fee account becomes depleted, the Wal-Mart or Gateway shall pay the currently
applicable transportation impact fee for each building permit in full prior to its issuance. In the
event that upon build-out of the development estimated transportation impact fees are still
unspent, the remaining balance of such estimated fees may be transferred to another approved
project within the same, or adjacent, transportation impact fee district, provided any vested
entitlements associated with the unspent and transferred transportation impact fees are
relinquished and the Certificate is modified to delete those entitlements.
7. With respect to Collier County Land Development Code Section 1O.02.03BA.a, the
current Site Development Plans and Plats on file with Collier County, and all future Site
Development Plans and Plats filed with Collier County pertaining to the Parcel during the time
this Section is in effect, shall not be withdrawn or cancelled solely due to the failure to obtain
state and federal permits, provided that Wal-Mart or Gateway are diligently pursuing the permits
and provides evidence to the County when requested that it is diligently pursuing the permits.
8. Wal-Mart or Gateway shall be responsible for all site related improvements including
turn lanes and traffic signals relating to the Development.
3
Agenda Item No. 10B
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 20
9. Wal-Mart agrees not to open to the public until the earlier of August I, 2006, or
upon written notice from Co Ilier County,
10, This Agreement shall not be construed or characterized as a development
agreement under the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act.
11, The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this
Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the parties which are the subject of this
Agreement.
12. The parties acknowledge that the failure of this Agreement to address any permit,
condition, term or restriction shall not relieve the parties, or their successors or assigns, of the
necessity of complying with any law, ordinance, rule or regulation governing said permitting
requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions.
13. In the event state or federal laws are enacted after the execution of this Agreement
which are applicable to and preclude in whole or in part the parties' compliance with the terms of
this Agreement, then in such event this Agreement shall be modified or revoked as is necessary
to comply with such laws, in a manner which best reflects the intent of this Agreement.
14. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement shall only be amended by
mutual written consent of the parties hereto or by their successors in interest. All notices and
other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be sent by
Certified Mail, return receipt requested, or by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service,
and addressed as follows:
To Wal-Mart:
Eric Strauss, Real Estate Manaf?er. FL and AK
Wal-Mart Stores East. LP
2201 S.E. 10th Street
Bentonville, AR 72716-0550
Office: (479) 204-0319
Fax: (479) 273-8380
With COpy to:
Kimberly McCormick, Assistant General Counsel
Wal-Mart Stores East. L.P.
2001 S.E, 10th Street
Bentonville. AR 72716-0550
Office: (479) 277-2356
Fax: (479) 277-5991
4
Agenda Item No. 10B
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 20
To Gatewav:
Gateway Shoppes. II. LLC an Indiana limited liability company
c/o William L. Schrage
Schrage Development Company
8900 Keystone Crossing
Suite 1200
Indianapolis. IN 46240
With a copy to:
Richard D. Y ovanovich, Esquire
Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson, P.A.
4001 North Tamiami Trail, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
Office: (239) 435-3535
Fax: (239) 435-1218
Notice shall be deemed to have been given on the next successive business day to the date of the
courier waybill if sent by nationally recognized overnight delivery service.
15. Wal-Mart and Gateway shall execute the Agreement first and it shall be recorded
by County in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, within fourteen (14) days after
County executes the Agreement. Wal-Mart or Gateway shall pay all costs of recording this
Agreement. County shall provide a copy of the recorded document to Wal-Mart and Gateway
upon receipt of the recorded document.
16. In the event of a dispute under this Agreement, the parties shall first use County's
then-current Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure. Following the conclusion of this
procedure, either party may file an action for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court of Collier
County to enforce the terms of this Agreement, said remedy being cumulative with any and all
other remedies available to the parties for the enforcement of this Agreement.
Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank
5
Agenda Item No. 108
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 20
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
by their appropriate officials, as of the date first above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
By:
By:
FRED COYLE, Chairman
, Deputy Clerk
AS TO WAL-MART
WITNESSES:
Print Name:
Name:
Position:
Print Name:
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this
subscriber,
driver's license no.
day of , 2005, before me personally appeared the
, who is [ ] personally known to me, or [ ] has produced
as identification.
NOTARY PUBLIC
(SEAL)
Name:
(Type or Print)
My Commission Expires:
6
Agenda Item No. 10B
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 20
AS TO GATEWAY:
WITNESSES:
Print Name:
Name:
Position:
Print Name:
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) S5.
COUNTY OF )
On this
subscriber,
driver's license no.
day of , 2005, before me personally appeared the
, who is [ ] personally known to me, or [ ] has produced
as identification.
(SEAL)
NOTARY PUBLIC
Name:
(Type or Print)
My Commission Expires:
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow
Assistant County Attorney
7
Agenda Item No. 10B
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 20
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this _ of May, 2005
(the "Effective Date"), by and between RIMAR, INC., a Florida corporation (hereinafter referred
to as the "Developer"), and THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY (hereinafter
referred to as "County"),
R E C I TAL S:
WHEREAS, Developer has a contract to purchase certain lands described in Exhibit "A"
(the "Parcel"), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, Developer intends to develop four hundred eighty-three (483) residential
units on the Parcel (the "Development"); and
WHEREAS, the Parcel accesses Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), which road County is in
the process of widening to six lanes ("Road Project") using the services of the engineering firm
of CH2M Hill, Inc, ("CH2M Hill") as the Project Engineers for the design and construction of
the Road Project; and
WHEREAS, County has represented that due to the level of service on Collier Boulevard
(C.R. 951), that absent adding an additional segment along Collier Boulevard to this Road
Project from U.S. 41 to Henderson Creek Drive (the "Added Portion"), the Development does
not satisfy concurrency requirements; and
WHEREAS, to induce County to design and construct the Added Portion, thereby
creating concurrency for its Development, Developer has agreed to pay, at different times set
forth below, (l) one-sixth of the design fees for the Added Portion ("Design Costs"), in the
estimated amount of $24,749.00, (2) one-sixth of the construction for the Added Portion, in the
estimated amount of$250,000.00 ("Construction Costs"), and (3) one-half of all road impact fees
estimated to be due for all authorized development; and
WHEREAS, prior to committing to pay County these funds, Developer would like
assurance that County will reserve sufficient road capacity for the Development; and
WHEREAS, Collier County Land Development Code Section 10,02.07CA.f provides
that Traffic Capacity Reservation for all or part of a proposed development may be approved and
secured at application pending approval of the final sub-division plat, site development plan or
building permit upon acceptance of a Traffic Impact Statement ("TIS") by the Transportation
Administrator; and
WHEREAS, the Transportation Administrator has reviewed and accepted Developer's
TIS, a copy ofwhich is attached hereto as Exhibit "B"; and
Agenda Item No. 10B
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 20
WHEREAS, based upon this TIS, together with the consideration set forth in this
Agreement, the Transportation Administrator has agreed to reserve sufficient Traffic Capacity
Reservation for the Development; and
WHEREAS, Developer and County respectively acknowledge and represent that each
has the full power and authority to enter into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, after reasoned consideration by the Board of County Commissioners, the
Board finds that this Agreement is in the public interest.
WIT N E SSE T H:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and
valuable consideration exchanged amongst the parties, and in consideration of the covenants
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. All of the above RECITALS are true and correct and are hereby expressly
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth fully below, and all Exhibits referenced herein are
made a part of this Agreement.
2. Developer will contribute and pay the Design Costs in the amount of $24,749.00
(1/6 ofCH2M Hill's Fee Schedule for same) within thirty days of the Effective Date. Developer
shall not be responsible for the cost of the design of any other aspects of the Road Project. The
Fee Schedule prepared by CH2M Hill is set forth in Exhibit "B". Developer shall pay for 1/6 of
any reasonable increase in the Design Costs within thirty days after receipt of a written request
for payment with supporting documentation from County. County shall refund to Developer any
monies collected from Developer for the Design Costs not utilized within thirty days of
acceptance of the road construction by County. Developer agrees that any dispute it may have
with respect to the Design Cost will be addressed to CH2M Hill or County's selected contractor,
as applicable, but not with County.
3. Developer will contribute and pay its share of the Construction Costs in the
amount of $250,000.00. Developer shall not be responsible for the cost of the construction of
any other aspects of the Road Project, or any costs of construction in excess of $250,000.00.
Within thirty days of the Effective Date, Developer will post a letter of credit suitable to County
with County to secure payment of this sum. Within the earlier of one year from the Effective
Date, or thirty days prior to commencement of the Road Project, Developer shall pay County the
sum of$250,000.00,
4. Within 30 days from receipt of the $24,749.00 payment and $250,000.00 letter of
credit set forth above, the Transportation Administrator will notifY Developer that County has
reserved sufficient traffic capacity for the Development. This reservation is subject to immediate
rescission upon Developer not timely meeting any payment set forth above. This reservation of
sufficient traffic capacity will expire one year following the Effective Date of this Agreement.
5. On or before February 10, 2006, the Developer shall obtain a certificate of public
facility adequacy ("Certificate") for roads for all development density and intensity authorized
2
Agenda Item No. 108
May 10, 2005
Page 13 of 20
by the Development by prepaying to the County one-half of the road impact fees estimated to be
due for all authorized development. It is estimated that this prepayment ("Road Impact Fee
Prepayment") will be at least $ 904,750.00. Payment of these fees vests the development
entitlements for which the Certificate applies on a continuous basis for three years unless
otherwise relinquished. This initial 50 percent impact fee payment is non-refundable after
payment and receipt of the Certificate,
6. Not later than 90 days prior to the expiration of the three year period for the
Certificate, the County shall notify Developer via registered mail of the remaining balance due
for the estimated transportation impact fees up to 50 percent, based on level of building permits
already issued. The balance of the impact fees due will be calculated at the rate schedule then
currently applicable, The Developer may elect to pay the balance of the estimated transportation
impact fees for the entitlements for which the Certificate applies or modify the Certificate to a
lesser entitlement and calculate the balance of the transportation impact fees on the revised
entitlements. The Certificate shall be modified to include only the entitlements for which the
estimated transportation impact fees are paid. Once the balance of the estimated transportation
impact fees are paid, those estimated fees are non-refundable. The Certificate runs continuously
with the land in perpetuity after all estimated transportation impact fees have been paid. As
building permits are drawn down on the entitlements, the estimated transportation impact fees
already paid shall be debited at the rate of the impact fees in effect at the time of utilization. It
shall be Developer's or a subsequent record titleholder's (of all or a portion of the Property; i.e.
lot/tract purchaser) obligation to notify the County that a credit is available, each time a building
permit is applied for, If the estimated transportation impact fee account becomes depleted, the
Developer shall pay the currently applicable transportation impact fee for each building permit in
full prior to its issuance. In the event that upon build-out of the development estimated
transportation impact fees are still unspent, the remaining balance of such estimated fees may be
transferred to another approved project within the same, or adjacent, transportation impact fee
district, provided any vested entitlements associated with the unspent and transferred
transportation impact fees are relinquished and the Certificate is modified to delete those
entitlements.
7. With respect to Collier County Land Development Code Section 10.02.03B.4.a, the
current Site Development Plans and Plats on file with Collier County, and all future Site
Development Plans and Plats filed with Collier County pertaining to the Parcel during the time
this Section is in effect, shall not be withdrawn or cancelled solely due to the failure to obtain
state and federal permits, provided that Developer is diligently pursuing the permits and provides
evidence to the County when requested that it is diligently pursuing the permits.
8. This Agreement shall not be construed or characterized as a development
agreement under the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act.
9, The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this
Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the parties which are the subject of this
Agreement.
10. The parties acknowledge that the failure of this Agreement to address any permit,
condition, term or restriction shall not relieve the parties, or their successors or assigns, of the
3
Agenda Item No. 108
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 20
necessity of complying with any law, ordinance, rule or regulation governing said permitting
requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions.
1 I. In the event state or federal laws are enacted after the execution of this Agreement
which are applicable to and preclude in whole or in part the parties' compliance with the terms of
this Agreement, then in such event this Agreement shall be modified or revoked as is necessary
to comply with such laws, in a manner which best reflects the intent of this Agreement.
12. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement shall only be amended by
mutual written consent of the parties hereto or by their successors in interest. All notices and
other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be sent by
Certified Mail, return receipt requested, or by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service,
and addressed as follows:
To County:
Harmon Turner Building
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
Attn: Norman E. Feder, A.I.c.P.
Transportation Division Administrator
Phone: (239) 774 8872
Facsimile: (239) 774 9370
To RIMAR:
With a copy to:
Richard D. Y ovanovich, Esquire
Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson, P.A.
4001 North Tamiami Trail, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
Office: (239) 435-3535
Fax: (239) 435-1218
Notice shall be deemed to have been given on the next successive business day to the date of the
courier waybill if sent by nationally recognized overnight delivery service.
13. Developer shall execute the Agreement first and it shall be recorded by County in
the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, within fourteen (14) days after County executes
the Agreement. Developer shall pay all costs of recording this Agreement. County shall provide
a copy ofthe recorded document to Developer upon receipt of the recorded document.
14, In the event of a dispute under this Agreement, the parties shall first use County's
then-current Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure. Following the conclusion of this
4
Agenda Item No. 10B
May 10, 2005
Page 15 of20
procedure, either party may file an action for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court of Collier
County to enforce the terms of this Agreement, said remedy being cumulative with any and all
other remedies available to the parties for the enforcement of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
by their appropriate officials, as of the date first above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
By:
By:
, Deputy Clerk
FRED COYLE, Chairman
AS TO RIMAR
WITNESSES:
Print Name:
Name:
Position:
Print Name:
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this
subscriber,
driver's license no.
day of , 2005, before me personally appeared the
, who is [ ] personally known to me, or [ ] has produced
as identification.
(SEAL)
NOTARY PUBLIC
Name:
(Type or Print)
My Commission Expires:
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow
Assistant County Attorney
5
Agenda Item No. 108
May 10,2005
Page 16 of 20
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this _ of May, 2005
(the "Effective Date"), by and between WCI COMMUNITIES, INC., a
corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Developer"), and THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF
COLLIER COUNTY (hereinafter referred to as "County").
R E C I TAL S:
WHEREAS, Developer has a contract to purchase certain lands described in Exhibit "A"
(the "Parcel"), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, Developer intends to develop seven hundred twenty-five (725) residential
units on the Parcel, also known as Lands End Preserve PUD (the "Development"); and
WHEREAS, the Parcel accesses Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), which road County is in
the process of widening to six lanes ("Road Project") using the services of the engineering firm
of CH2M Hill, Inc. ("CH2M Hill") as the Project Engineers for the design and construction of
the Road Project; and
WHEREAS, County has represented that due to the level of service on Collier Boulevard
(C.R, 951), that absent adding an additional segment along Collier Boulevard to this Road
Project from U.S, 41 to Henderson Creek Drive (the "Added Portion"), the Development does
not satisfy concurrency requirements; and
WHEREAS, to induce County to design and construct the Added Portion, thereby
creating concurrency for its Development, Developer has agreed to pay, at different times set
forth below, (1) one-sixth of the design fees for the Added Portion ("Design Costs"), in the
estimated amount of $24,749.00, (2) one-sixth of the construction for the Added Portion, in the
estimated amount of $250,000.00 ("Construction Costs"), and (3) one-half of all road impact fees
estimated to be due for all authorized development; and
WHEREAS, prior to committing to pay County these funds, Developer would like
assurance that County will reserve sufficient road capacity for the Development; and
WHEREAS, Collier County Land Development Code Section 10.02.07CA.f provides
that Traffic Capacity Reservation for all or part of a proposed development may be approved and
secured at application pending approval of the final sub-division plat, site development plan or
building permit upon acceptance of a Traffic Impact Statement ("TIS") by the Transportation
Administrator; and
WHEREAS, the Transportation Administrator has reviewed and accepted Developer's
TIS, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B"; and
Agenda Item No. 10B
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 20
WHEREAS, based upon this TIS, together with the consideration set forth in this
Agreement, the Transportation Administrator has agreed to reserve sufficient Traffic Capacity
Reservation for the Development; and
WHEREAS, Developer and County respectively acknowledge and represent that each
has the full power and authority to enter into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, after reasoned consideration by the Board of County Commissioners, the
Board finds that this Agreement is in the public interest.
WIT N E SSE T H:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and
valuable consideration exchanged amongst the parties, and in consideration of the covenants
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. All of the above RECITALS are true and correct and are hereby expressly
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth fully below, and all Exhibits referenced herein are
made a part of this Agreement.
2. Developer will contribute and pay the Design Costs in the amount of $24,749.00
(1/6 of CH2M Hill's Fee Schedule for same) within thirty days of the Effective Date. Developer
shall not be responsible for the cost of the design of any other aspects of the Road Project. The
Fee Schedule prepared by CH2M Hill is set forth in Exhibit "B". Developer shall pay for 1/6 of
any reasonable increase in the Design Costs within thirty days after receipt of a written request
for payment with supporting documentation from County, County shall refund to Developer any
monies collected from Developer for the Design Costs not utilized within thirty days of
acceptance of the road construction by County. Developer agrees that any dispute it may have
with respect to the Design Cost will be addressed to CH2M Hill or County's selected contractor,
as applicable, but not with County,
3. Developer will contribute and pay its share of the Construction Costs in the
amount of $250,000.00. Developer shall not be responsible for the cost of the construction of
any other aspects of the Road Project, or any costs of construction in excess of $250,000.00.
Within thirty days of the Effective Date, Developer will post a letter of credit suitable to County
with County to secure payment of this sum. Within the earlier of one year from the Effective
Date, or thirty days prior to commencement of the Road Project, Developer shall pay County the
sum of$250,000.00.
4. Within 30 days from receipt of the $24,749.00 payment and $250,000.00 letter of
credit set forth above, the Transportation Administrator will notify Developer that County has
reserved sufficient traffic capacity for the Development. This reservation is subject to immediate
rescission upon Developer not timely meeting any payment set forth above, This reservation of
sufficient traffic capacity will expire one year following the Effective Date of this Agreement.
5, On or before February 10, 2006, the Developer shall obtain a certificate of public
facility adequacy ("Certificate") for roads for all development density and intensity authorized
2
Agenda Item No. 108
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of20
by the Development by prepaying to the County one-half ofthe road impact fees estimated to be
due for all authorized development. It is estimated that this prepayment ("Road Impact Fee
Prepayment") will be at least $ 2.000.000.00. Payment of these fees vests the development
entitlements for which the Certificate applies on a continuous basis for three years unless
otherwise relinquished. This initial 50 percent impact fee payment is non-refundable after
payment and receipt of the Certificate.
6. Not later than 90 days prior to the expiration of the three year period for the
Certificate, the County shall notify Developer via registered mail of the remaining balance due
for the estimated transportation impact fees up to 50 percent, based on level of building permits
already issued, The balance of the impact fees due will be calculated at the rate schedule then
currently applicable. The Developer may elect to pay the balance of the estimated transportation
impact fees for the entitlements for which the Certificate applies or modify the Certificate to a
lesser entitlement and calculate the balance of the transportation impact fees on the revised
entitlements. The Certificate shall be modified to include only the entitlements for which the
estimated transportation impact fees are paid. Once the balance of the estimated transportation
impact fees are paid, those estimated fees are non-refundable. The Certificate runs continuously
with the land in perpetuity after all estimated transportation impact fees have been paid. As
building permits are drawn down on the entitlements, the estimated transportation impact fees
already paid shall be debited at the rate of the impact fees in effect at the time of utilization. It
shall be Developer's or a subsequent record titleholder's (of all or a portion of the Property; i.e.
lot/tract purchaser) obligation to notify the County that a credit is available, each time a building
permit is applied for. If the estimated transportation impact fee account becomes depleted, the
Developer shall pay the currently applicable transportation impact fee for each building permit in
full prior to its issuance. In the event that upon build-out of the development estimated
transportation impact fees are still unspent, the remaining balance of such estimated fees may be
transferred to another approved project within the same, or adjacent, transportation impact fee
district, provided any vested entitlements associated with the unspent and transferred
transportation impact fees are relinquished and the Certificate is modified to delete those
entitlements,
7, With respect to Collier County Land Development Code Section 10.02.03B.4,a, the
current Site Development Plans and Plats on file with Collier County, and all future Site
Development Plans and Plats filed with Collier County pertaining to the Parcel during the time
this Section is in effect, shall not be withdrawn or cancelled solely due to the failure to obtain
state and federal permits, provided that Developer is diligently pursuing the permits and provides
evidence to the County when requested that it is diligently pursuing the permits.
8. This Agreement shall not be construed or characterized as a development
agreement under the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act.
9. The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this
Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the parties which are the subject of this
Agreement.
10, The parties acknowledge that the failure of this Agreement to address any permit,
condition, term or restriction shall not relieve the parties, or their successors or assigns, of the
3
Agenda Item No. 10B
May 10, 2005
Page 19 of 20
necessity of complying with any law, ordinance, rule or regulation governing said permitting
requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions.
11. In the event state or federal laws are enacted after the execution ofthis Agreement
which are applicable to and preclude in whole or in part the parties' compliance with the terms of
this Agreement, then in such event this Agreement shall be modified or revoked as is necessary
to comply with such laws, in a manner which best reflects the intent of this Agreement.
12. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement shall only be amended by
mutual written consent of the parties hereto or by their successors in interest. All notices and
other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be sent by
Certified Mail, return receipt requested, or by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service,
and addressed as follows:
To County:
Harmon Turner Building
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
Attn: Norman E. Feder, A.I.C.P.
Transportation Division Administrator
Phone: (239) 774 8872
Facsimile: (239) 774 9370
To WCI:
With a copy to:
Richard D. Y ovanovich, Esquire
Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson, P.A.
4001 North Tamiami Trail, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
Office: (239) 435-3535
Fax: (239) 435-1218
Notice shall be deemed to have been given on the next successive business day to the date of the
courier waybill if sent by nationally recognized overnight delivery service.
13. Developer shall execute the Agreement first and it shall be recorded by County in
the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, within fourteen (14) days after County executes
the Agreement. Developer shall pay all costs of recording this Agreement. County shall provide
a copy of the recorded document to Developer upon receipt of the recorded document.
14. In the event of a dispute under this Agreement, the parties shall first use County's
then-current Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure. Following the conclusion of this
4
Agenda Item No. 108
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 20
procedure, either party may file an action for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court of Collier
County to enforce the terms of this Agreement, said remedy being cumulative with any and all
other remedies available to the parties for the enforcement of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
by their appropriate officials, as of the date first above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
By:
By:
FRED COYLE, Chairman
, Deputy Clerk
AS TO WCI
WITNESSES:
Print Name:
Name:
Position:
Print Name:
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this
subscriber,
driver's license no.
day of , 2005, before me personally appeared the
, who is [ ] personally known to me, or [ ] has produced
as identification.
(SEAL)
NOTARY PUBLIC
Name:
(Type or Print)
My Commission Expires:
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow
Assistant County Attorney
5
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 236
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to adopt a Resolution authorizing the acquisition by Condemnation of
non-exclusive, perpetual utility and maintenance easements, temporary construction
easements, and access easements for the construction of a sewer force main, raw water
mains and well sites for the South County Regional Water Treatment Plant (SCRWTP)
Reverse Osmosis Wellfield Expansion to 20-MGD, Project Number 708921, at a cost not to
exceed $3,050,000.
OBJECTIVE: The public purpose is to obtain authorization from the Board of County
Commissioners, as the Governing Body of Collier County and Ex-Officio Governing Board of the
Collier County Water-Sewer District (hereinafter referred to as "Board") to acquire land interests
for the construction and maintenance of utility improvements and facilities for the South County
Regional Water Treatment Plant Reverse Osmosis Wellfield Expansion to 20-MGD, (hereinafter
referred to as the "Project"). These land interests include acquisition by Condemnation of non-
exclusive, perpetual utility and maintenance easements, temporary construction easements, and
access easements.
CONSIDERATIONS: This project has been identified as one of the capital improvement
projects required under the 2003 Water Master Plan Update adopted by the Board on May 25,
2004, Agenda Item 10(0). The project involves the construction of a sewer force main, raw water
mains and wells that will provide water to be treated by the SCRWTP.
The proposed expansion of the system will provide an additional yield of I6-MGD of raw
feedwater to supply the proposed I2-MGD reverse osmosis expansion at the SCRWTP, which
expands the total reverse osmosis finished water production capacity of this facility to 20-MGD.
The Project includes acquisition of property rights for 23 well sites, utility corridors and site
access.
Staff has reviewed alternative locations, environmental factors, cost variables, safety and welfare
considerations (see attached memorandum - Exhibit "B") as they relate to the construction of the
Project and has determined the most feasible location for the utility improvements for the Project.
The location of these improvements is shown on Exhibit "A" of the attached Resolution.
On January 27, 2004, Agenda Item I6(C)(4), the Board approved a resolution authorizing the
acquisition by gift or purchase of the necessary rights and interests required for this Project. Thus
far, staff has been unable to secure all of the required parcels through negotiations, so in order to
meet the Project's revised land acquisition completion date of October 30, 2005, permission is
requested to initiate condemnation proceedings at this time,
On January 11, 2005, the Board adopted a Condemnation Resolution (Resolution) for property
rights acquisition required for the Project. The Board also requested that discussions continue
with certain affected property owners who expressed their concerns during the meeting. As
requested, there have been several discussions and meetings with the affected property owners.
.-
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 236
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Resolution for Condemnation
SCRWTP RO Wellfield Expansion to 20-MGD
Page 2
Two property owners have requested that well sites be moved to other locations on their property
to accommodate future uses. Well sites No, 4, 5 and 20 are proposed to be moved to
accommodate these requests.
There are six well sites located on the Willow Run Land Trust property (Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and
12). During negotiations with the property owners for the Willow Run Land Trust property, staff
was made aware of existing Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) restrictions at the location of four proposed well sites (Nos,
6, 7, 8 and 12) on the Willow Run Land Trust property. The existing permit restrictions would
also impact access to two additional well sites (Nos. 13 and 15) that are adjacent to the Willow
Run Land Trust property. A total of six well sites are directly or indirectly subject to the ERP
permit restrictions, Discussions with FDEP indicate that these permit restrictions are not
insurmountable and that the County could prevail in obtaining the well sites for their intended use;
however, there are challenges to modifYing the existing ERP that could significantly delay the
project. Consequently, it is proposed that these six well sites be moved outside of the areas that
are subject to the existing ERP restrictions. Moving these six well sites can be done with minimal
_~ impact to the original Project schedule and will not change the date that water from this wellfield
will be available for processing at the SCRWTP. It is also proposed that five of these six well
sites (Nos, 7, 8, 12, 13 and 15) be moved to a corridor parallel to and east of C.R. 951. This
corridor is also known as the Henderson Creek Canal Right-of-Way, and is County-owned
property. The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) has control of permitting for
all activities within this corridor, It is proposed to move the remaining well site (No.6) that is
within the area subject to the existing ERP restrictions to a location on the Willow Run Land Trust
property adjacent to the Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) corridor that is outside ofthe area
subject to ERP restrictions. It is also proposed to relocate well site No. lIon the Willow Run
Land Trust property to be adjacent to the FPL corridor in order to improve access to the well site.
It is proposed to move two additional well sites (Nos. 9 and 19) from their current locations on
privately owned lands adjacent to the Henderson Creek Canal Right-of-Way to the Henderson
Creek Canal Right-of-Way in order to minimize property acquisition for well sites by
condemnation.
,.....-..
The Henderson Creek Canal Right-of-Way was considered but not utilized in the previous
alignment because of uncertainty associated with the acceptability to SFWMD of locating above
ground structures in the canal right-of-way, and uncertainty of the effects of the CR 951 road-
widening project on the canal alignment. Recent discussion .with SFWMD has indicated that
location of the well sites within the right-of-way is acceptable, providing that access along the east
canal bank is maintained for SFWMD. Thirty percent design plans for the road widening of CR
951 were available in March 2005 and indicate that acceleration/deceleration lanes on the east side
of CR 951 associated with the proposed road work will not require widening of the canal on its
east bank, or prevent access for SFWMD in the vicinity of the proposed well sites.
Agenda Item NO.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 236
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Resolution for Condemnation -
SCRWTP RO Wellfield Expansion to 20-MGD
Page 3
The location of certain wells in the canal right-of-way has the following advantages: lessened
environmental impacts; fewer impacts to private property owners; ability to accelerate
construction of the wells located in the right-of-way because property acquisition is not required;
and avoidance of potential permitting delays.
During final design of the well field, it was also learned that FPL would require a dedicated 10-foot
wide access easement from the underlying fee property owner from the FPL easement corridor to
all well site locations with generators. The FPL easement requirements can be accomplished with
the current wellfield alignment; however, additional agreements or easements will be required for
FPL, which could delay the Project schedule. As a result, it is proposed to move well site No. 16
from its current location to approximately 100 feet to the west to abut the FPL corridor and avoid
the need for the FPL easement. All well sites along the FPL corridor that require generators will
abut the FPL corridor with the proposed well site revisions.
Locations of the current wellfield alignment and well locations are shown on attached Exhibits "C-
1" and "C-2". Locations of the proposed well field alignment and well locations are shown on
attached Exhibits "0-1" and "0-2". The attached Resolution incorporates the proposed well field
alignment and well locations.
An overall project time line is attached as Exhibit "E."
A Technical Memorandum dated August 2002 summarizing the investigations conducted to
establish, evaluate and compare alternate routes for the well transmission mains and well sites
intended to convey water to the SCRWTP, and a Technical Memorandum dated November 2003
documenting methods used for identifying and recommending possible locations for 23 proposed
well sites have been provided to the Board for its consideration. These same criteria have been
similarly considered by staff and the consultant for the proposed relocation of the wells and
pipelines discussed herein. The Technical Memorandums are on display in the Board of County
Commissioner's Office, 3rd Floor, W. Harmon Turner Building, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples,
Florida.
FISCAL IMP ACT: Total acquisition cost is estimated at $3,050,000, and includes all land,
improvements, appraisal fees, title policies, staff overhead and miscellaneous expenses associated
with the acquisition of the necessary utility easements, including attorney fees and expert witness
costs incurred by the property owner which the condemning authority is required to pay under the
provisions of Chapter 73, Florida Statutes.
Funds are available in the FY 05 budget for this action in Project 708921, South County Regional
Water Treatment Plant Reverse Osmosis Wellfield Expansion to 20-MOD. The FY 05 budget was
approved by the Board on September 23, 2004. Source of funds is Water Impact Fees (411).
,~....,.."
Agenda Item NO.1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 236
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Resolution for Condemnation -
SCRWTP RO Wellfield Expansion to 20-MGD
Page 4
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The project is recommended in the latest 2003 Water
Master Plan adopted by the Board in May 25, 2004, Agenda Item 10 (D).
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Having reviewed alternative locations, environmental factors, cost variables, safety and
welfare considerations as they relate to the construction of the Project, find that the
most feasible location for the utility improvements for the construction of the Project is
as shown on Exhibit "A" of the attached Resolution;
2. Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the acquisition by condemnation of non-
exclusive, perpetual utility easements, temporary construction easements, and access
easements as required to complete the South County Regional Water Treatment Plant
Reverse Osmosis Wellfield Expansion to 20-MGD.
3. Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Resolution; and
4. Approve any and all necessary budget amendments.
PREPARED BY:
Toni A, Mott, Manager, Property Acquisition & Sales
Real Estate Services / Facilities Management Department
,.............
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting O_te
Agend3 Itern No 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 5 01 236
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
~oc
R~GDmrpendatio!1 !ei lH10pl e Rer.DI~lti1lr, mlthNi2mg the ;Jt:ql,liSltior: by Condem1'laiHJn or
non-exc!Uiiive, perpati.J8! utility and rr.aintenar,c.:1! eas.ernents, temporary corastructi.:.n
ealsmant... and acces.s easement~ for the construction of B s~er force main. rzw water
main6 and weB r.itu reqUired lor the South County Regional Water Treatmen! Plant
ISCRWTP) Reverse OlilTlosis. WelJfleld E"pension to 20-MOD, P~ojfl:ct NumDer 708::'121. at
<l (:('i~t nt~1 to exceed $3,050,0I)D (Jim Dl.ll.otly, J\dtl"1lflislr<ltol Publoc U!dilir.SI
51"10120D5 9 DO'OU AM
prtpared By
Real Properry Supervisor
4J25r,lOU5 5:15:55 PM
Toni A. Mott
Admlnlstratl\te Services
Date
f'aclllttll:$ Management
Peorfirio E. Gramatoes, P,E
Sr. Project Mill1llgcr
""le
Approved By
Public UUlfties
Public Utilltles I:.nglneering
4126(20056:3:4 AM
operations Director
Date
Apprond By
Thomas Wide&
IlubUc Utllltle!
roubUc Utilities Operations
4126120051:3& A.M
Real E'!it.:lte Sl!"rvlcc$ M.1n.1ger
Do"
Apprond By
Charle~ E. Carrll\g1olt, Jr.,
SfUWA
Adminls.trative Services
Facilities Managernt'<nt
4/26r.l005 10:31 AM
Skip Camp, C.F.M
Fadlitic1- Management Dirottor
Da"
Approved By
Administrative Services
FacUlties Management
.uZ6f200S 10:32 AM
VViUiam D. M\lIUn PE
P,inclpal Project tl1analJar
Date
Approved By
Public Utilities
~lubllC Utmtles. E.nglneerlng
4/2612005 12:03 PM
Roy B. Anderson, P.E.
Public Utllltie30 EnljineerlnQ Dir6Ctor
D,te
Approved B)'
Ptlblie Utilltie!l
Public Utilitie_'J Engineering
.4J2'6120U5 5:23 PM
James W. OeLol\Y
Public UtlllUe" Adnllni-lOUatUl
Date
Appro'\'ed By
PUblic Utilltle'S
Public Utllltieti Admlnlstra.tion
4I2712U051:1:112 AM
Admlni$baliv~ A$~h;tllnt
""le
Approved B)'
OM B Goordinatot
CClunty M<lna('lttr's t)ffice
Office of Manage men! & Budget
4J2SrlG05 .ua PM
Senior Man3g~meotlBtldg:et Analvst
Dale
Approved By
SlJl;.an U$hef
CO\lntv Manager'\ OffiCi!
OffIce of M.m.lgement & Budget
5lU20D5 1D:43 A.M
MiChlltllsmykowski
M.;.nOlgetnent & BIJdgel Director
Dare
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Manegement & 8udget
51212U05 ti:UQ PM
Approved By
Jam"b V. Mudd
BoarD or County
Commis1iioner$.
County Manager
Date
County Manager'. Office
513120055:51 PM
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 236
RESOLUTION NO. CWS-2005-
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF LAND BY CONDEMNATION OR
PURCHASE OF NON-EXCLUSIVE, PERPETUAL UTILITY AND MAINTENANCE
EASEMENTS, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS, AND ACCESS EASEMENTS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SEWER FORCE MAIN, RAW WATER MAINS AND WELL
SITES REQUIRED FOR THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT'S SOUTH
COUNTY REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT (SCRWTP) REVERSE OSMOSIS (RO)
EXPANSION TO 20 MGD WELLFIELD PROJECT, PROJECT NUMBER 708921.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the Governing Body of Collier County
and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, (hereinafter
referred to as "Board"), on May 25,2004, adopted the 2003 Water Master Plan Update for the County's
Water Service area in order to establish priorities for the design, acquisition, and construction of the
various water capital improvement projects;
WHEREAS, the SCRWTP RO Expansion to 20 MGD Wellfield Project, hereinafter referred to
as "Project" is one of the water capital improvement projects required under the 2003 Water Master
Plan Update for the County's Water Service area; and
WHEREAS, the Board, on January 27, 2004 adopted Resolution No. 2004 -23, and Resolution
No. CWS - 2004 -0 I, authorizing staff to acquire by gift or purchase those property rights required for
the construction of the above-referenced project; and
WHEREAS, the location for construction of the proposed improvements has been fixed by
survey and is collectively represented by the legal descriptions comprising Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, after consideration of the availability of aJternate routes and locations, the
comparative costs of project alternatives, various impacts upon the environment, long range planning
options, and public safety considerations, Board desires to exercise its right to condemn property for
public purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COUlER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF
COLLIER COUNTY AND EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
WATER-SEWER DISTRICT, that it has been determined by the Board that the construction of a sewer
force main, raw water mains and wells (hereinafter referred to the "Project") is necessary and in the
best interests of the general public.
1
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 236
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that construction of the project is part of the County's long
range planning effort, and is included in the 2003 Water Master Plan Update for the County's Water
Service area, as approved by the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Staff has reviewed alternative locations
for the project, various impacts to the environment, public safety and welfare considerations associated
with the design and construction of the project. and the costs associated with the design, property rights
acquisition, and construction of the project; and the Board finds that after consideration of these issues
the most feasible location for construction of the proposed improvements is collectively represented by
the legal descriptions comprising Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to construct the project as designed, it is
necessary for the Board to acquire the various real property interests described in Exhibit "A" to wit:
perpetual, non-exclusive utility and access easements and temporary construction easements,
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that all property shall be put to public purposes.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that County staff is hereby authorized to acquire
immediately by gift, purchase or condemnation in the name of the Board, in accordance with the
provisions of Chapters 73, 74 and 127, Florida Statutes, the above-referenced real property interests
more particularly described in Exhibit "An attached hereto and incorporated herein,
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that no mobile homes are located on the property sought
to be acquired and therefore it will not be necessary to remove any mobile homes from the property to
be acquired.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution supersedes Resolution 200542/CWS
Resolution 2005-01 adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on January II, 2005, Agenda
Item IOD.
This Resolution adopted on this
day of
, 2005, after motion,
second and majority vote.
A TrEST:
DvnGHTE.BROCK,CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COlLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
BY:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to fonn and
l~ufficienCy:
~ ~V&~
Ellen T. Chadwell
Assistant County Attorney
2
EXHIBIT A5"O
page-L of ...J.
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10. 2005
Page 8 of 236
PROJECT 7<>'t q ;z, I
PARCEL.. --?_C!L r< _
FOLl 0 004 3'3 "I ()O()O ;;z.,
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 20
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, 1WP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
NORTI1 UNE OF TI1E N 1/2
OF TI1E NW 1/4 OF lliE NW 1/4
N8T58'H"E
170.24'
S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4
OF THE NW 1/4
LESS THAT PARCEL
DESCRIBED IN
O.R. 3261/3460
FOUO NO.:
00433400002
i~t{OFOF TI1~t~~~~
Ii! OF THE NW 1/4
N88"59'10"E
100.06' PROPOSED
P.O.B. I 15' UTILITY
EASEMENT
~
g~ I
~~I
5
l/)
!{EX:
C.R.-COUNTY ROAD
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O,R, - omCIAL RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.e:-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
...
.
,....
t'l-
S-
ei
10
5-
x
170'
FP&:LR/W
EASEMENT
~.
~~::-
w-~
x~:z:
::Jxw
Wwj;
IE
N88.S9'JJ"W
~ 40.00'
t'l
~ d I
_ ll) ~
~ 40.00' J..,.
588'59'33"[ l:t S I
100.06' g ~
S88'59'10"W
PROPOSED
WELL NO. 20'
EASEMENT
/
O.R. 3261/3460
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
ti!ill.;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CAlCULA lED ARE BASED ON A flEW SUR\ot:Y OF
SECTION 23, BASIS OF BEARING: STAlE PLANE
COORDlNATr SYSTrM, F1..A. EAST ZONE. '83i90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFf-KEY C. COONER AND ASSOCI AlES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, llC DRAWN BY: JRr CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIP1l0N: 'MOll NO. 20 DATE: 8/26/04 SCALE: '--60' REV: 3/30/05
TrI.CPORARY CONSlRUCTlON EASEMENT IN TH
NW 1/4 OF' THE NW 1/4 OF SEC 23-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC2JW-TCE(TC20 SHEET: 1 OF 2
----~~~:::!L..~-
JAME ,YtlU<ISON (FOR THE FIRM Le6nJ)
PROFE ONAl SUR\ot:YOR AND MAPPER
FLORIDA UCENSE NO. LS 4676
THIS .2.!!rDAY OF' M.-. 2005.
EXHIBIT A
Page~ of '6"0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
p~e 9 of 236
PROJECT 70'6 :L f
PARCEL lOt R
FOlIO 00 '-f 3 340000::t
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 20
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, lWP 50 $,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEL LYING IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORlliWEST 1/4 OF SEC1l0N 23, TOWNSHIP SO SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORlliWEST 1/4 OF
THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN S87"SB'14"W, A DISTANCE OF 170,24 FEET ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE
RUN SOl'OO'27"W, A DISTANCE OF 174.41 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER
AND LIGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID LINE ALSO RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE
OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOl.00'27"W ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 100.09 FEET;
THENCE RUN N88.S9'33"W, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOl'OO'27"W, A
DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID WEST LINE; THENCE
RUN S88.59'33"E, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S01.00'27"W, A DISTANCE OF
30.02 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO lliE NORTH LINE OF A PARCEL DESCRIBED IN
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3261, PAGE 3460; THENCE RUN S88'S9'10~W, A DISTANCE OF
100.06 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE; THENCE RUN N01.00'27"E. A DISTANCE OF 180.11
FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARAllEL TO SAID WEST LINE; THENCE RUN N88.59'10"E, A
DISTANCE OF 100.06 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL TO THE NORl1-I LINE OF SAID
PARCEL TO THE POINT OF 8EGINNING,
CONTAINING 16,011 SQUARE FEET OR 0.37 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
"
ALL RECORDING REFERENCES ARE FROM THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA. '.
SEE SHEET 1 Of 2
FOR SKETCH
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
ClJENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. LLC DRAWN BY: ~F CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCR DESCRIPllON: WELL NO. 20 DAlE: e/26/04 SCALE: IREV: 3/30/05
PROOUCTION WEll UTIUTY EASEMENT IN lH
NW 1/4 Of' lHE NW 1/4 Of SEe 23-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC23W-TCE(TC20JlSHEET: 2 OF 2
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Pajl,e 10 of 236
PROJECT 70 ~ C; ;</
PARCEL 1?O( N
FOlIO Q? <f '3 ~'t O~ ~
EXHIBIT-A-
Page~of~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECll0N 23, T'M' 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA
P.O.C.
NW COR
SECTION 23
N87'38'03"E
1182.68'
r
NORTH UNE OF' THE
NW 1/4 OF' THE NW 1/4
10
Ol ::l
ci :?;
U 0
1==
If;l
,~
j:J
;;to
I
NORTH UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF'
THE NW 1/4 OF' THE NW 1/4
S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4
OF THE NW 1/4, LESS lllAT
PARCEl DESCRIBED IN
O,R. 3261/3460
FOLIO NO.:
00433400002
170'
F'.P.&l..
R/W
EASEMENT
KQ:
C.R,-COUNTY ROAD
F'.P.&L-F'lORIDA POWER k UGH
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O.R. - OmClAl RECORDS BOOk !PAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O. C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
155.10'
S88~9'1O-W
I I O.R. 3261/3460
;to
.
..... )
N
0
P
~
.:t
~
,..:
~
DESCRIPTION OF' A PARCEL L'o1NG IN lllE SOUlll 1/2 OF THE NORlllWEST 1/4 OF' THE NORTHWEST I;'. OF' SECTION
2.3, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlll, RANGE 26 EAST, COlUER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, lllENCE RUN N87.38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 11B2.68
FEET !-LONG lllE NORlll UNE OF' lllE NORlllWEST 1/4 OF lllE NORlllWEST 1/4; lllENCE RUN SOI'OO'27"E A
DISTANCE Of 662.16 FEET ALONG A UNE lllAT RUNS PARALLEL TO lllE EAST UNE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF' lllE
NORlllWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF' BEGINNING: THENCE RUN NBr5e:14"E, A DISTANCE OF' 155.22 FEET ALONG THE
NORTH UNE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF' THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN
SOI'OO'27"W, A DISTANCE OF 357,55 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UHE TO THE NORlll UNE OF A PARCEl DESCRIBED IN
omClAL RECORDS 800K 3261, PAGE 3460; THENCE RUN S88"59'10"W, A DISTANCE Of 155.10 FEET ALONG THE
NORTH UHE OF' SAID PARCEl; THENCE RUN N01'00'27"E, A DISTANCE OF' 354.79 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT IS
PARAlLEL TO SAID EAST UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 55.207 SQUARE FEET OR 1.27 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
All RECORDING REFERENCES ARE F'ROM THE PUBUC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
liQlE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES. AND AREAS
CAlCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF'
SECTION 2.3. BASIS OF' BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE. '83/"90.
----~~
JAMES . Yc1LKISON (F'OR THE FIRM LB677J)
PRO tONAL SURVEYOR AND lAAPPER
F'lOR ~CENSE NOl }S 4876
THIS " DAY OF ~OO5.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL.: SURVEYlNGCCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. LLC DRAWN BY: JRF" CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEl DESCRIPTION: DATE: 3/16/05 SCAlE: 1-.60' REV:
ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE
NW 1/4 OF' THE NW 1 .. Of SEe 23-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWO NO:SEC23T-AE(AE3) SHEET: 1 Of' 1
EXHIBIT -L-
P.ge....!t.- of l~O
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 236
PROJECT
PARCEL
FOlIO
7{)fJq~1
qO/(l
00t{ ~ 140000 ;1.
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 20
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA
NORTH UNE OF THE S 1/2
OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
I S67.56'14.W
h
Fl8
~ .
~
~t~ t
~ ~1- I
~ Q~ I
~ I
I
I
I
I
Ii
P.O,C. NE
CORNER OF THE
S 1/2 OF THE
NW 1/4 OF
THE NW 1/4
S 1/2 OF l1-IE NW 1/4
OF ~E NW 1/4
LESS ~AT PARCEL
DESCRIBED IN
O,R. 3261/3460
FOUO NO.:
00433400002
fP&L R/W
EASEMENT
N88"59' J"
40,00'
ISEY:
C,R,-COUHlY ROAD
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O.R. - OFfICIAL RECORDS BOOK/pAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O. C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
,
DESCRIPl10N OF A PARCEL LYING IN THE SOUlli 1/2 OF THE NORTHVtEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHVtEST 1/4 OF SECTION
23, TO'IfNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FlORIOl1:
COMMENCING AT THE NOR'J}IEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF 'J}IE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE NOR'J}IWEST 1/4,
THENCE RUN S67"56'14"W, A DISTANCE OF 170.24 FEET ALONG lHE NORTH UNE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE
NORTHVtEST 1/4 OF lliE NORTHVtEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN S01'OO'27"W, A DlSTANCE OF 274.50 FEET ALONG lHE WEST
UNE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE ALSO RUNS PARALLEL TO 'J}IE EAST
UNE OF SAID SOU'J}l 1/2 OF THE NORlliWEST 1/4 OF lliE NORlliWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; lliENCE
CONllNUE SOI'OO'27.W ALONG SAID UNE, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET: THENCE RUN NBS.S9'J3.W, A DISTANCE OF
40.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NOI.00'270E, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARAlLEL TO SAID
WEST UNf; THENCE RUN S88.59'33"E, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 2,000 SQUARE FEET OR 0.05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~~S~~~~-;,~ LB6773)
PR~O~ltl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
Fl..ORIQA UCENSE NO, LS -<<176
THIS J.1!r"DA Y OF ~ 2005.
tiQlt:
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA lED ARE BASED ON A flEW SURVEY OF
SECl10N 23. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '63/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA lES. INC.
SURVEYING ANO MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUIT[ 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 fAX; (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE'11NGOCOONER.COtA
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, llC DRAWN BY; JRF CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: WEll NO. 20 DATE: 8/26/04 SCALE: 1".30' REV: 3/30/05
PRODUCl1ON WEll UTIUTY EASEMENT IN TH
NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC 23-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No:SEC2JW-TCE(P20) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHJBJT-A-
Page-LOf~
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 12 of 236
PROJECT 7015 if:2 I
PARCEl 90 ';<A N~
FOLIO o~'t~?'fOO4:J;J.,
~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 Of' SECll0N 23, T\WJ 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
l(P'O.C.
NW COR
SEClJON 23
NB7"3B'03'E
1l6~.64'
y
t,
H-J
L
~
iii ,..,
0> N
Ii ~
0
1=
rt3
III
fw
Z
I::J
3:
I
S 1/2 Of TI-lE NW 1/4
Of TI-lE NW 1/4, lESS THAT
PARCEL DESCRIBED IN
O.R, 3261/3460
l"
~g
~ ~.~ <
~ '" r ~ N87'5!!"."E
P.O.B.-......... 15.02
- -IS'
r' ~
Qfa ~~
~~~.~.~a
~ j:{ g
3:
h
~>'
~ . ')
NORTI-l UNE Of TI-lE S 1/2 OF
THE NW 1/4 OF' THE NW 1/4;
FOUO NO.:
~~COUNTYROAD 00433400002
F'.P,&L-F1.ORIDA POM:R & UGHT
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
O.R, - OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BECINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENC(MENT
S88159',O"w _
115.01' \
170'
f.P.&L
R/W
EASEMENT
5
~~
:s;g
<> ~ :s
....
w::::-
3:
z
O.R. 3261/3460
I I
lJ
OESCRIPlIQt)I OF A 15-1" DOT STRIP OF lAND L YlNC IN THE SOUTH 1/2 Of mE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST
1/4 Of SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHVlt:ST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23. THENCE RUN N87'38'03'E, A DISTANCE Of 1167.64
FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF' THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF' THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO A POINT Of INTERSECTION WITH
THE .wEST UNE Of A 170-1" DOT FLORIDA POVlt:R AND LIGHT RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT; THENC( RUN SOI'OO'27'E A
DISTANCE Of 662,09 fEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST UNE Of mE NORm WEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHM:ST 1/4 TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NS7"58'14'E, A DISTANCE OF IS.02 fEET ALONG THE
NORTH LINE Of SAID SOUTH 1/2 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of THE NORTHM:ST 1/4; TI-lENCE RUN SOI'OO'27"W, A
DISTANCE Of 354,79 fEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARAllEl TO THE EAST UNE Of SAID SOUTH 1/2 Of 1llE
NOR1llWEST 1/4 Of THE NORTHVlt:ST 1/4 TO THE NOR1ll LINE OF A PARCEL DESCRIBED IN OFFlClAL RECORDS BOOK
3261, PACE 3460; 1llENCE RUN S88'S9'10"W, A DISTANCE Of 15.01 FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE Of SAID PARC(l;
THENCE RUN N01'OO'27"e:. A DISTANCE Of 354.S3 rEET ALONG THE Vlt:ST LINE Of SAID FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID LINE ALSO RUNNING PARAlLEL TO SAID EAST LINE; TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING S,320 SQUARE fEET OR 0.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
ALL RECORDING REFERENCES ARE FROM THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, flORIDA.
JA-~";';''''~~R~ Ul6m)
PR~:~~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORIDA }J,CENSE No.. LS 4876
THIS n DAY OF/~2005.
t:IQ]I;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANC(S, AND AREAS
CAlCULA TED ARE BASED ON A F'IELO SURVEY OF
SECl10N 23. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINA IT SYSTEM, FlA, EAST lONE, '83/'90.
TH,S IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOOA lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
J900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)2n-0722 FAX: (;.39)2n-7179 EMAlL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
ClIENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAYtN BY: ~F" CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DATE: 3/16/05 SCALE: 1'-80' REV:
Ul1UTY EASE'LlENT IN mE
NW 1/4 OF" THE NW 1/4 OF' SEC 23-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC23T-AE(P3) SHEET: 1
Of 1
iii
'" ~
0: =c
<J ~
I~
Iw
I~
:I:
l~
EXHIBIT _A
Page~of ~
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
PROJECT 7~ ~ ~f 236
PARCEl '1 0 ~ R
FOt 10 00'/333 (,ooC>3
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
P.O,C.
NW COR
SEC1l0N 23
NORTH UNE Of "/HE N 1/2
OF' lllE NW 1/4 OF' lllE NW 1/4
N87"38'03"E
1167.64' --.f---
EXISl1NG ROAD AND Ul1UTY
EASEMENT O.R, 1099/2211
------J'------r-
JII:
~
N87'38'03"[ ~ S
he)
0' U)....
. tl8T38'OJ:E"
155.26
~~
~o:
V1::l
~~
is
:t:
155.26 -
S81'38'OJ"W 51
w
FE
~~
~:I:
_=c
z:g
~t5
u..~
0_
IaIJ11:
3=c
iJ
S. UNE Of "/HE N 1/2 OF "/HE
NW 1/4 OF mE NW 1/4
k
::J
~
'I
15'
N 1/2 OF mE NW 1/4
OF THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO,:
00433360003
170'
F,P.&L
R/W
EASEMENT
100'
m:
C.R.-COUNTY ROAD
F.P.deL-FLORIDA POWER de UGHT
R/W - RIGHT-OF~WAY
O'R. - OF'flClAl RECORDS BooJ</pAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C,-POlNT OF' COMMENCEMENT
DESCRIPllQ~ OF A SlRlP OF' LAND L'YlNG IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF "/HE NORlliWEST 1/4 OF
SECllON 23. TO'lfNSHIP 50 SOU'TH. RANGE 26 EAST. COWER COUNTY. FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECll0N 23, THENCE RUN N87"J8'OJ"E, A DISTANCE OF 1187.64
FEET ALONG lHE NOR'TH UNE Of SAlt) NORTH 1/2 OF lHE NORlHWEST 1/4 OF' lHE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO A POINT OF
INTERSECllON Willi THE Wl::ST UNE OF A 170-I"OOT FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID
POINT BEING lliE POINT OF BEGINNING; mENCE CONllNUE N87.38'03"E, A DISTANCE Of 15.02 FEET ALONG SAID
NORlli UNE: lliENCE RUN SOI'OO'27"E A DISTANCE OF' 10.02 FUT ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARAllEl TO lliE
EAST UNE Of SAID NORTH 1/2 OF lliE NOR'THWES', 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN N87.38'03"E, A
DISTANCE Of 155.26 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARAu.EL TO,SAID NORlli UNE: THENCE RUN SOl'OO'27"W A
DISTANCE Of 20,03 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE: lHENCE RUN S87"JB'03"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.26 FEET ALONG
1HE SOUlli UNE OF A ROAD AND UllUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFlClAL RECORDS BOOK 10lil9. PAGE 2277,
PUBUC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA. A UNE 'THAT RUNS PARAUEL TO SAID HORlH UNE: lHENCE RUN
SOI'00'27"W A DISTANCE OF 632.13 rEET AlONG A UHE 'THAT RUNS PARAUEl TO SAlD EAST UNE: 'THEHCE RUN
SB7"58'14.W, A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET ALONG lliE SOUTH UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 Of lHE NORlliWEST 1/~ OF'
nlE NOR'THWl::ST 1/4 TO THE Wl::ST UNE OF' SAID 170-FooT FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT:
nlENCE RUN N01'00'27"E A DISTANCE OF 662.09 FEET ALONG SAID WEST EASEMENT UNE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 13,037 SQUARE FEET OR 0.30 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
wm::
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A AElD SURVEY OF
SECllON 23, BASIS OF' BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINA'TE SYS'TEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
lH/S IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD.. SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: {239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELE:Y AND HANSEN, LtC DRAWN BY: ~F' CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DAlE: 8/26/04 SCALE: 1"-60' REV: 3/16/05
UllUTY EASEMENT IN lliE
NW 1/4 Of 'THE NW 1/4 Of SEC 23-50-26 PROJECT No; 020901 OWG No:SEC23T-AE(Pl) SHEET: 1 or 1
101, WILKISON (FOR 'THE ARM LB6773)
P SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FL RIDA..I:!CENSE NO, J..S 4876
THIS L:!.:.. DAY Of ~05,
~
01 ::J
Ii ~
OF
u
!H
W
Z
:J
:it:
I
I
I
I
~~H~BloT~
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
PROJECT 701ffr:!)4 of 236
PARCEl 703
FOlIO OO'l.133~ 000,3
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO, 21
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH LINE OF THE N 1/2
OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
P.O,C.
NW COR
SECTION 23
N87.38'03.E
b
-
PROPOSED
UTILITY
EASEMENT
1167.64'
EXISTING ROAD ANOlHlU!:!- _
O.SEt.AENl 0.if.1 09972277
967.4~ N87"38'03.[
d
100.17'''' ~
p.o.a ,
:it:
~ "8/
1"1 " .
g ~~
PROPOSED PRODUCTION - ,- I
WELL NO. 21 UTILITY EASEMENT - _______ N88'59 3J.W
~ 40.00' /
~~. I
. 0
~d
_to
:7l S88"59'3J E I lif~~:TL.
4O.00':it:
h. I
~;;;
~ d I
_to
~
I
of-
~~
N:it:
'-Z
-w
2:;;
~~
t'>~
w:it:
~z
WW
;;
N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4
OF THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO,:
00433360003
1SfY:
C.R.-COUNTY ROAD
F.P,&:L-FLORIDA POWER &: UGHT
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
O.R. - OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O,C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
w
.
,...
N
b
p
5
2:
S87"Ja'OJ.w 100.17' I
OESCRIPTI~ OF A PARCEL LYING IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION
23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2J. THENCE RUN N87"J8'03.E, A DISTANCE OF 1167.64
FEET AlONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
SOI'OO'27.W, A DISTANCE: OF 30,05 FEET WEST ALONG THE WEST Ut{E OF A 170-FOOT FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT
RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT. SAID UNE RUNNING PARALLEl TO THE EAST UNE Of' SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 Of' THE NORTHY.EST 1/4, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOlW.27"W, A DISTANCE:
Of' 60.00 FEET ALONG SAID Y.EST RIGHT-OF'-WAY EASEMENT UNE: THENCE RUN N66'59'JJ"W, A DISTANCE: OF' 40.00
FEET: THENCE RUN S01"OO'27.W A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST
UNE: THENCE RUN S88'59'33"E, A DISTANCE Of 40.00 FEET TO SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT UNE; THENCE
RUN SOl'00'27.W, A DISTANCE OF' 60.Jl FEET ALONG SAID Y.EST RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT UNE: THENCE RUN
587'38'03.W. A DISTANCE OF 100.17 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARAUJ::L TO SAID NORTH UNE; THENCE RUN
N01'00'27'E A DISTANCE OF 180.31 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN
N87"38'03.E, A DISTANCE OF 100.17 FEET ALONG lllE SOUTH LINE Of A ROAD AND UTlUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED
IN OF'FlClAL RECORDS BOOK 1099. PAGE 2277, PUBUC RECORDS OF' COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A LINE THAT RUNS
PARALLEL TO SAID NORTH LINE lllE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CON~ING 15,631 SQUARE FEET OR 0.36 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
--- -~~~
JA N. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB6773)
PR SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORf!lA I,.ICENSE NO-,)L!t--.i.876
THIS'~AY OF .rz.a::-2004.
IiaIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA lED ARE BASED ON A FlElD SURVEY OF'
SECTION 2J. BASIS OF BEARING: STAlE PLANE
COORDINA lE SYSTE.... FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOClA lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD.. SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 fAX: (239)277-7179 EM AIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
WENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: WELL NO, 21 DATE: 8/26/04 SCALE: 1....60' REV: 10/20/04
lD.fp, CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN THE
NW 1 4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF' SEC 23-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:S[CDw-TlX(n:21) SHEET: 1 Of 1
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 1 D. 2005
Page 15 of 236
EXHIBIT-L.
Page..Lof ~
PROJECT 7tJq C; ;( I
PARCEL ~03 R
FOLIO oot..( '533'000 3
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA
NORTH UNE Of lHE
~~'gOR N 1/2 Of THE NW 1/-4- P.O,B. #1
SECTION 23 OF THE NW 1/-4- \ ,
. " ~ 1182,68
N87"3803 E ~ - - - . J< .
- - EXISTING ROAD AND Ul1ltTY b h ~
_ EASEMENT 0.~099/2277'" ~g
ill
iO
0> ::l
Ii ~
d 1=
lCi3 N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4
en OF THE NW 1/4
I~ FOUO NO.:
I~00433360003 -Jf
I PROPOSED IS'
KE):' UTILITY
C.R,:"COUNTY ROAD EASEMENT
f.P.&L-FLORIDA POWER at: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O,R. - OfFlClAL RECORDS BOOK/pAGE
P.O,B,-POlNT OF BEGINNING
P,O.C.-POINT OF COUMENCEMENT
155.26'
~
!!I=
z..,.
~;;.
-i:
Zz
lUlU
j!:j!:
~~
~
~
e
~
~
170'
F,P.&:L. R W
EASEMENT
'L
155.22'
S87'58'14"W
S. UNE OF lHE N 1/2 OF' THE
NW 1/4 OF lHE NW 1/-4-
IU
Z
:J
w
DESCRIPTION Of PARCELS Of lAND LYING IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF lHE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of lHE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
SECllON 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
(I)COMMENClNG AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECllON 23, THENCE RUN N87"J8'03"E, A DISTANCE Of
1182,68 FEET ALONG THE NORlH UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF lHE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO
lHE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUE N87"~'3'03"E, A DISTANCE OF' 155.26 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH UNE TO
THE EAST UNE OF SAID NORlH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF lHE NORlHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN S011)O'27"W A
DISTANCE OF 10,02 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE: THENCE RUN S87"J8'03"W, A DISTANCE OF 155,26 FEET ALONG
SAID NORTH UNE: THENCE RUN N01'OO'27"E A DISTANCE Of 10.02 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARAu.EL TO
SAID E~ST UNE TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING:
AND;
(2)COMMENCING AT lHE NORlHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, THENCE RUN N87"38'OJ"E, A DISTANCE OF'
1182.68 FEET ALONG THE NORlH UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORlHWEST 1/4 OF' lHE NORTHWEST 1/4:
THENCE RUN SOI"OO'27"W A DISTANCE OF 30.05 FEET ALONG A UNE lHAT RUNS PARAu.EL TO SAID EAST UNE TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN N87"38'03"E, A DISTANCE Of 155.28 FEET ALONG lHE SOUTH UNE OF A
ROAD AND UTIUlY EASEt.4ENT AS RECORDED IN OfFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1099. PAGE 2277, PUBUC RECORDS OF
COlUER COUNTY, fLORIOA, A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID NORlH UNE, TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN
SOI1)O'27"W A DISTANCE OF 633,04 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE: THENCE RUN 587'SS'14"W, A DISTANCE OF' 155.22
FEET ALONG lHE SOUlH UNE OF' SAID NORTH 1/2 OF' THE NORlHWEST 1/4 OF lHE NORlHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
N011)O'27"E A DISTANCE OF 832.13 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE TO lHE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 99,603 SQUARE FEET OR 2.27 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
tiQlE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCUlATED ARE BASED ON A FlELO SURVEY OF
SECTION 23, BASIS OF' BEARING: STATE PLANE
COOROINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVE'I1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONiAl BLVD., SUiTE.... FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREEI.!:Y AND HANSEN. LiC DRAWN BY: .Rf CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPlION: DAlE: 8/26/04 SCALE: 1".60' REV: 3/18/05
ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE
NW 1/4 Of lHE NW 1 4 OF SEC 23-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC23T-AE(AE1) SHEET: 1 OF 1
~%~E~~~ Le6773)
=S~iC:~L SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORlI}A..JJCENSE ~78
THIS ~~DAY OF 2005.
EXHIBIT A
Page---1-.of I r;'O
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 236
PROJECT 109 '1'< I
PARCEl 903
FOlIO Do L/ $5.3 '0 C:P3
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 21
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
P.O.C.
NW COR NORlH UNE OF lHE N 1/2
SECnON 23 OF THE NW 1/4 OF lHE NW 1/4
N87.38'0;S"E _ _ -"f
1167.64'
f---
iO
'"
~
~
G
IX
EXISTING ROAD AND Ul1UlY
EASEMENT M. 1099/2277 ~
b
.....
m:
C.R.-COUNTY ROAD
F.P.&I....-FlORIOA POYlffi &: UGHT
R/W - RIGtH-OF-WAY
O.R. - OFFlCAl RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P,O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
N 1/2 OF Tl-lE NW 1/4
OF THE NW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00433360003
S88"59'3J"(
40.00. P.O.B.
L
I
I
0:
U
w
z
::J
Ei:
PROPOSED
UTILITY
EASEMENT
/'70' F.P.&l.
EASEMENT
W
"'.
NO
. 0
Sd
~fO
!i1
Ei:
~8
Sd
~fO
o
VI
....
~::::-
.....;t
'"'z
-tU
z~
;g~
~:;
W;t
~z
WW
F
NSS.S9'3J"W
40.00'
OESCRIPll~ OF' A PARCELL'r1NG IN lHE NORTH 1/2 OF lHE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECl10N
23, TOv.tISHlP 50 SOU1H, RANGE 26 EAST. COlliER COUNTY, FLORID,A:
COMMENCING AT 1HE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECl10N 23, THENCE RUN N87"38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1167.64
FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF 1HE NORTHv.t:ST 1/4 OF THE NORTHv.t:ST 1/4; lHENCE RUN
SD1"OO'Z7"W, A DISTANCE OF 90.05 FEET WEST ALONG THE WEST UNE or A 170-FooT FLORIDA POYlffi AND UGHT
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARAllEL TO lHE EAST UNE OF SAID NORlH 1/2 OF lHE
NOR1Hv.t:ST 1/4 OF lHE NORlHWEST 1/4, TO 1HE POINT OF BEGINNING; 1HENCE CONTINUE 501 "OO'Z7"W, A DISTANCE
OF 60.00 FEET ALONG SAID v.t:ST RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT lINE; 1HENCE RUN N88'59'33"W, A DISTANCE OF 40,00
FEET; THENCE RUN N01.00'27"E A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET ALONG A UNE lHAT RUNS PARALllL TO SAID EAST
UNE; lHENCE RUN S88'59'33"E, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING.
W2IE;
lHE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCUl.A TED ARE BASED ON A RElD SURVEY OF
SECTION 23. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA, EAST ZONE. '83/,90,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
.EFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4. FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 E~4AIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN. llC DRAWN BY; JRF CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: WEll NO, 21 DATE: 8/26/04 SCALE: 1"-30' REV: 10/Z0/04
PRODUCTION WElL UllUTY EASEMENT IN lH
NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC 23-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 owe NO:SEC23W-Tt:E(P21) SHEET: 1 OF 1
CONTAINING 2,400 SQUARE FEET OR 0,06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
&;~
--- - --------------
JA N. Yo1U<ISON (FOR 1HE FIRM L96773)
PR SSlONAL SURvEYOR AND MAPPER
FLOR~U~SE NQ, L~ _4876
rnls"l: A Y or ~ 2004,
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10,2005
Page 17 of 236
EXHIBIT .....L.
Page-LLt-of~
PROJECT 70'5Q:l. I
PARCEL "70Lf
FOlIO 004~Lf Ilooa:>-o
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
80' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 .OF SECTION 23. TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E. COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA
P,O.C.
NW COR
SECTION 23
1>187.38'03"E
PROPOSED 20'
UTiLITY
EASEMENT
NORm UNE OF THE
NE 1/4 Of mE NW 1/4\
4' ~
1337,9 -........ EXlSnNG ROAD AND UTILlT!-
- .~ - EASEMENT OR9817295 g
P.O,B. g Iil N87.38'03"E
-w.
. It)
....0
i:>i
15
z
. ,.,
~h
011)
nl~
NORTH UNE OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
in
'" ::.l
Ii z
d 0
F=
u
l:j
l!i
:::!
I,.,
S87.38'03"W
1157.43'
F.P,&L R/W
EASEMENT
~,
--
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
CONSTRUC TiON EASEMEN T
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 22
w~
zz
ww
~i':
~~
NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00434160008
KO::
C,R.-COUNTY ROAD
F,P.&L.-FLORIDA POWER & UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
O.R. - OF'FlClAL RECORDS BOOK/pAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O. C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
DESCRIPTION Of A 3D-FOOT STRIP OF LAND L'l1NG IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 23.
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COlUER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT TI-lE NORTI-lWEST CORNER OF SAID SEcnON 23, THENCE RUN N87'38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1337.94
FEET AlONG THE NORTH UNE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN SOI'OO'27"W, A
DISTANCE OF 30,05 FEET ALONG THE VtEST UNE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POlNT
OF BEGINNING; TI-lENCE RUN N87'38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1157.51 FEET ALONG mE SOUTH UNE OF A ROAD AND
UTIUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OffiCIAL RECORDS BOOI< 981, PAGE 295, PUBUC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, A LINE THAT RUNS PARAllEL TO THE NORTI-I UNE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4;
THENCE RUN SOIW'57"W A DISTANCE OF 30.06 FEET; THENCE RUN S87'J8'OJ"W, A DISTANCE OF 1157.43 FEET
ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARAlliL TO SAID NORTH UNE, TI-lENCE RUN N01'OO'27"[, A DISTANCE OF 30.05 FEET
ALONG SAID Ytf:ST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
CONTAINING 34,724 SQUARE FEET OR O.BO ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~/ tl.QIE;
~~ THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
-- ----- ---------- CALCULAltD ARE BASED ON A RElD SURVEY OF
J N. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB677J) SECTION 23. BASIS OF BEARING: STAlt PLANE
~U)B1D~Sl~~~S~~~Y~R ~~ MAPPER COORDINAlt SYSltt.4, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
THI~1>AY OF' S::!:C 2004. nus IS NOT A SURVEY
~EY C. COONER AND ASSOOATES, INC.
SURVE't1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, Fl.ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 Et.CAIL: SURVE't1NGGCOONER.COM
CUENT; GREElEY AND HANSEN, LtC DRAWN BY; ~F' CHECKED BY; J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPll0N: DATE: 8/28/04 SCALE: 1"-60' REV: 10/20/04
ltUP. CONSTRUCTION EASEUENT IN THE
NE 1 .. OF' THE NW 1 .. OF' SEC 23-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG NO:SEC2JT-AE(TC2) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT --A...-
Page...J..Lof~
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 236
PROJECT 7of>Q:z I
PARCEl '10 Lf
FOLIO 004/ 3'flbO~o '6
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 20' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN ll-fE NE 1/4 OF ll-fE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
iii
OJ ~
DC z
o 0
F=
u
l>I
l!i
::J
,~
\"NORTH UNE OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
~
Cp.o.c. ;.... NORTH UNE OF THE NE 1/4
NW COR Nb OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4----...
SECllON 23 ~ ~ \
NB7'JB'OJ"L v' 1JJ7.94' ~ / ~8~'J8'OJ"E EXISTING ROAD AND UllUTY. I.;
-- ----.:1.1- P oe O.R. lID1/"..... g I'
J.-~ '.. I...
~o .
- -g-'" S87'J8'OJ"W
5
z
1 JJ7.lIl ,
1337.86'
~~
dJ.-
NIO
~
~
-t~
- -
L'
~~
L
NE 1/4 OF ll-fE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00434160008
5-
W~
jEz
15;E
!;g15
::J
.,.
w.......
F,P.&:L R/W
EASEMENT
W~
zz
WlL!
~iE
~15
lU
Z
ID:
C.R.-COUNTY ROAD
F.P.&:l.-F'LORIDA POWER &: UGHT
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O.R. - OF'FlClAl RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
p.o.e.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF' COMMENCEMENT
DESCRIPllON OF A 20-FOOT srnlP OF LAND l VlNG IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF' THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of' SECTION 23,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTl-t. RANGE 26 EAST, COlliER COUNTY, F'LORIDk
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2J, THENCE RUN N87'38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF' lJJ7.94
FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF TliE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF' Tl-tE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN S01'OO'27"W, A
DISTANCE Of' 10.02 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF' SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT
OF' BEGINNING; THENCE RUN N87'J8'OJ"(, A DISTANCE OF lJ37,91 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARAllEL TO
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF' THE NORTHWEST'I/4 TO THE EAST UNE OF SAIO NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
THE NORTHWEST '/4; THENCE RUN SOI'09'57"W A DISTANCE OF' 20.04 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN
S87'J8'03"W, A DISTANCE OF' 1 J37.86 FEET AlONG THE SOUTH LINE OF A ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT AS
RECORDED IN OF'FlClAl RECORDS BOOK 981. PAGE 295, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID LINE
RUNNING PARAllLl TO SAID NORTH LINE, THENCE RUN N01'oo'27"E, A DISTANCE OF' 20.03 FEET ALONG SAID WEST
UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
ItQ1E;
THE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE eASED ON A RELO SUR'vn" OF'
SECTION 2.3, BASIS Of' BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM. FlA. EAST ZONE. '83/"90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND A SSOCl A TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EM AIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
ClIENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAWN BY: JRF' CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/26/04 SCALE: 1"-60' IREV: 10/20/04
UTlUTY EASEMENT IN THE
NE 1/4 OF lHE NW 1/4 OF SEe 23-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No: SEC2JT-AE(P2) SHEET: 1 OF' 1
CONTAINING 26.758 SQUARE FEET OR 0.61 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
JCh-~-(;;;;;;:;,~~~ LB6m)
=:i~Al SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
F'L~.o~ LICENSE NQ. l~. 4876
llllS ~A Y OF' <.Ls:.2t' 2004.
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 19 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Page~of I t;"D
PROJECT 7().gQ;l. /
PARCEL 70S-
FOLIO 00 43'-/1 fa Doo<1?
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 22
IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORlH LINE OF lHE
NE 1/4 OF lHE NW 1/4l l=1
1 _ _-
EXiSTING ROAD A~TIUTY ~_ - - - 8!'
- - - EASEMENTo:R. 981/295 i;l 1 .'. g In
-; N87.38'03"E N87 J8 OJ E 0.
- - 65.34' I!lS - .... ~ 65.00 ".O.B. ~
0. ~8 o~o;j ~1Il
d ~ . q~ 8
C5 CJt, t.n ...-
PROPOSED 20' "i "0.00' "i
UTILITY ITI N87"Je'OJ"E '"
EASEMENT h ~
~ PROPOSED PRODUCTION WELL ~
~ NO. 22 UTILITY EASEMENT 51
z
(P.O'C.
NE CORNER
OF THE
NE 1/4 OF
lHE NW 1/4
"
r~
t
KEY:
C.R.-COUNTY ROAD
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
O.R, - OFFlClAL RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
P,O.B,-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O,C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
se7.Je'03.W
180.34'
~
..,.
11.I"-
Z_
11.I'"
j!:z
~~
~~
:::I
L\J
NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOliO NO.:
00434160008
DESCRIP1.1QM OF A PARCEL LYING IN lHE NORlHEAST 1/4 OF lHE NORTHWEST '/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUlH, RANGE 26 EAST, COlliER COUNTY, FLORIO A:
,
COMMENONG AT lllE NORll-iEAST CORNER OF SAID NORlllEAST 1/4 OF lHE NORTHWEST 1/4, lllENCE RUN
501 "09'57"W, A DISTANCE OF JO.06 FEET ALONG lllE EAST UNE OF SAID NORlllEAST 1/4 OF ll-iE NORlHWEST '/4
TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING; lHENCE CONl1NUE S01.09'S7"W 100,19 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE; lHENCE RUN
S87"3e'03"W, A DISTANCE OF 180,34 FEET ALONG A UNE lHAT RUNS PARALlEL TO lllE NORlH UNE OF' SAID
NORlHEAST 1/4 OF lHE NORlHWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN N01"09'57"E, A DISTANCE OF 100.19 FEET ALONG A LINE
lHAT RUNS PARALlEl TO SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN N87"38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 65,34 FEET ALONG lHE SOUlH
LINE OF A ROAD AND UTILITY E^SEMENT ^S RECORDED IN OF"FlClAL RECORDS BOOK 981, "^GE 295, PUBlIC
RECORDS OF COlUER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A UNE lHAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID NORTH LINE; rnENCE RUN
S02'21'57"E A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; lHENCE RUN N87"3e'03-E, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET ALONG II. UNE lHAT
RUNS PARALlEl TO SAID NORTH UNE; lHENCE RUN NOZ'21'S7"W A DISTANCE OF" 40.00 FEET; rnENCE RUN
N87"38'OJ"E, A DISTANCE OF 65.00 FEET ALONG 511.10 SOUlH EASEMENT LINE TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 15,634 SQUARE FEET OR 0.36 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
&~-
JA N. WILKISON (FOR THE FlRM 1>>6773)
P SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
A.ORI~ lI~SE NQ. ~ 4876
lHlS ~Y OF'~ 2004,
/iQIE;
lHE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ^RE BASED ON A FJELD SUR\-t:Y OF
SECllON 23, BASIS OF BEARING: STA~ PLANE
CooRDINllTE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/,90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A lES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAJL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND H^NSEN, LtC DRAWN BY: ~F" CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PAACEL DESCRIPTION: va.J. NO, 22 DATE: 8/28/04 SCALE: '"-60' IREV: 10/20/04
TnlP. CONSlRUCllON EASE:t.lENT IN THE
HE '/4 OF 'THE NW 1/4 OF SEe 23-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 owe NO:SEC2JW-TCE(TC2.2ISHEET: , OF ,
EXHIBIT ~
Page~of~
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 236
PROJECT 70 ~ if 21
PARCEL qos-
FOLIO Ooi./J'i/hooo q
SKETCH AND DESRCIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL UTILITY NO. 22
IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FlORIDA
L~
I~
NORTH UNE OF THE
NEIl. OF me NW 1/.l
-1~ EXIS~G RO~AN~TIUTY
- 0 EASEMENT O.R. 981/295
,.., 0
N
S87".38'03"W 50,00'
-
(P'O'C'
PROPOSED 20' NE CORNER
UTILITY OF" THE
EASEMENT NE 1/4 OF"
THE NW 1/4
J.
~
- - - ~~~
g~
o
If!
.2!!7"38'03".!..-65.~ _
P.O.B.
he
E s'
lil
'F
" .
!"I 8
~~
N
o
Z
.:t
-....
~)-
w~
jEz
l's~
WL...
~o
W
N8T38'03"E ~.OO.
J:{Ey:
C,R.-COUNTY ROAD
R/W - RIGHT-OF"-WAY
O.R, - OfFIOAL RECORDS BOOK !PAGE
P.O.B,-POINT OF' BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOUO NO,:
00434160008
DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEl,. LYING IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOY.tlSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COMMENONG AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF" THE NORTHVlEST 1/4, THENCE RUN
S01'09'srw, A DISTANCE OF" 30.06 fEET ALONG THE EAST UNE or SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF' THE NORTHWEST 1/4;
THENCE RUN S87'J8'03"W, A DISTANCE OF 65.00 fEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF" A ROAD AND UTIUTY EASEMENT
AS RECORDED IN OfFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 981, PAGE 295, PUBUC RECORDS OF COlLIER COUNTY, flORIDA, A UNE
THAT RUNS PARALlEL TO THE NORTH UNE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF' THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF"
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE S87'3B'03"W, A DISTANCE OF" 50.00 fEET ALONG SAID SOUTH EASEMENT UNE; THENCE
RUN S02"21'S7'E A DISTANCE OF 40.00 fEET; THENCE RUN N87"38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF' 50,00 fEET ALONG A LINE
THAT RUNS PARAUEL TO SAIO NORTH LINE; lllENCE RUN N02'21'57"W A DISTANCE OF' 40,00 fEET TO THE POINT OF"
BEGINNING.
t'iQI[.;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, ANO AREAS
CALCULA rro ARE BASED ON A AELO SURVEY OF
SECTION 23, BASIS OF' BEARING: STArr PLANE
COORDlNA rr sYSrrM, F1..A. EAST ZONE. '83/"90,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD.. SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 F"AX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRA WN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J,N. W,
PARca DESCRIPll0N: WELL NO, 22 DAlE: 8/26/04 SCALE: 1".30' IREV: 10/20/04
PROOUCllON WELL UTlUTY EASEMENT IN TH
NE 1/4 Of' THE NW 1/4 OF SEC 23-.50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC23W-TCf:(P22>ISHEET; 1 OF' 1
CONTAINING 2,000 SQUARE F"EET OR 0.06 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
-~A~~ lB6773)
~~~i~RVE,(OR AND MAPPER
FlORlg~ U<;ENSE NO. ~ 4876
THIS -~AY OF" Q 2004.
EXHIBIT -A-
Paga-Li.of~
Agenda Item No. i0e
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 236
PROJECT 7o'SY:2 I
PARCEL ~ O{o
FOLIO OO'-l/~7,<oooo
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 5,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF
~ THE S 1/2 Of THE SW 1/4 Of
I THE SW 1/4
P.O.C.
~w CORNER OF'
SECTION 14
---
N87"38'03"E
~ ;r:
I ~ ~
~
~
~~ F,P.&L. R/W
'" EASEMENT
-170'
S ~ JAl
~>-~ ;!l
:S:;lX I 0,
ll<~< ~
a.::>w 8
z
I rP.O,B.
155.24'
- - - J,/ S87.38'03"W
1182.69' '- SOUTH UNE SECTION 14
~-f'
N........
........~
~;r:
~~
w....
FF-f'
i5~~
w~~
~~w
~F
- ~~~
o
~~
L~
f~
/.
N87"37'19"E
155.24'
S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE
SW 1/4 OF mE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00416720000
tiEr:
f,P,&L-FlORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O,B.-POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
DESCRjPllON OF' A PARCEL OF LAND L YlNG IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUn1WEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FlORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF' SAID SECTION 14. THENCE RUN N87"38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,182,69
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF' SAID SECllON TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NOO'49'35"E, A DISTANCE
Of 335.07 FEET AlONG A UNE RUNNING PARALLEl TO THE EAST UNE OF' SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF' THE SOUTH 1/2 OF
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF ll-IE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN N87"37'10"E. A DISTANCE OF 155.24 F'EET ALONG THE
NORll-l UNE Of' SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUlH 1/2 OF ll-IE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
SOO'49'JS"W, A DISTANCE OF 335.10 F'EET ALONG SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN S87"38'03"W, A DISTANCE OF
155,24 FEET AlONG THE SOUlH UNE OF SAID SECTION 14 TO THE POINT Of' BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 51,944 SQUARE FEET OR 1.19 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
;A~- N~ "Uo-1.~;,. lHErn~ IBm,)
P SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
Fl RIDA Uc.ENSE No.. LS 4876
THIS 2-~Y OF ~ 2004. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA TESt INC.
SURVEYING ....NO MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EM AIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN. LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKEO BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPll0N: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"..100' I REV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE SW ~
Of ll-IE SW 1/4 OF SEC 1<4-S0-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC14T-AE(AEI3:tSHEET: 1 OF 1
l:IQlr;
-mE PARCEl BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A RELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF' BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
EXHIBIT --1L-
Page...1.L of ~
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 22 of 236
PROJECT
PARCEL
FOLIO 00'/167;{ 0':>0 0
10'3 9 ;Z I
qo(o
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A f 5' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FlORIDA
NORTH UNE Of THE S 1/2 Of
r- THE S 1/2 Of THE SW 1/4 Of
I THE SW 1/4
S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4
OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00416720000
;...
o
iii
..,
..,
;J::
.
to
..,
0,
:t
8
VI
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMEN T
170'
~.,.
N'
~;
VI'"
........
FF..,.
~ ...~~
~ 0
0, ....~~
:t S~w
~ 8 ~"'i!'
z "'w
~F~
~
L,
~J
t.
\" 15.02'
N67"37'19.E
m:
F.P.&L-FLORIOA POWER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.B,-POlNT OF BEGINNING
P.O. C.-POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
15'-
I---
P.O.C.
+::w CORNER OF
SECTION 14
---
...
~
0,
:t
8
z
t-
o
iii
I'l
..,
N67"36'03.E
S87"J6'03.W
P.O.B. ~ V- 15.02'
1167.67' \ 1 _ _
---
""-- SOUTH UNE SECTION 14
'--
DESCRIPTIO", OF A IS-FOOT STRIP OF lAND L'rlNG IN mE soum 1/2 Of mE SOUTH 1/2 Of THE SOUTHWEST 1/4
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANG( 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N87"38'OJ.E, A DISTANCE OF 1,167.67
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE Of SAID SECTION TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NOO"49'3S.E, A DISTANCE
OF 335.07 FEET ALONG TAE WEST UNE Of A 170-fooT FlORIDA POWER AND UGHT COMPANY RIGHT-Of-WAY
EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARALLEL TO THE EAST UNE Of SAID soum 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF mE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN N87"37'I9.E, A OISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET AlONG THE NORm
UN[ OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF mE SOUTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN
SOO'49'35"W, A DISTANCE Of 335.07 fEET AlONG A UNE THAT IS PARAlLEL TO SAID EAST UNE; mENCE RUN
S8r38'03.W, A DISTANCE Of 15.02 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE Of SAID SECTION 14 TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 5,026 SQUARE FEET OR 0.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
:;;;;'-~;;TIi-;'~" "'8m)
PR~~AL SURvEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORI/UI_ UCt1;NSE Ng., q 4876
THIS ~y OF '>ilf=. 2004. ltflS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOQA TE5, INC.
SURVE'\1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY ANO HANSEN. U.C DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCftIPllON; DATE: 8/J/04 SCAlE: 1....100. I REV: 10/20/04
15' UTIUlY EASEt.iENT IN THE SW 1/4
OF' THE' SW 1/4 OF SEe 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SECI4T-AE(P13) I SHEET: 1 OF 1
WilE;
THE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES. AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A flEW SURVEY Of
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/'90.
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 23 of 236
EXHIBIT A
page~of I r;;l)
PROJECT 7o~t:t ~ I
PARCEL '6() 7
FOLIO OeJ r /~ 7 6000 -;z..
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN lHE SW 1/4 OF lHE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA
1SfY:
F.P.&L-FlORIDA POWER & UGHT CO,
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O,C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
FOLIO NO.:
00416760002
N87"36'34-E
155.24' ~oof"
in <'I'
... ,~
0 0 ..... -~
~ l:lI ~ ~ z
o~~ lUl&J
Q.:Jw jEi!:..,.
oF=lI) 0.
g:::;>,:) i ~~:::-
lU~~
z~
::J l&J
~lI)F
170' ~~
F.P,&L. R/W
EASEMENT
'--
NORm UNE OF mE N 1/2 OF
mE S 1/2 OF mE SW 1/. OF
mE SW 1/4
N 1/2 OF lHE S 1/2 OF THE SW
1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
soum UNE OF 1l1E N 1/2 OF
r mE S 1/2 Of mE SW 1/4 Of
mE SW 1/4
w
. .
~~~ ~~
+ sw CORNER OF !2 QI
SECTION 14 ~;..
8
2:
- - - N87"38'O:S"E v^ 11 62.69''- sC:: U: SECTION 14 ~ ~ :
DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEL OF LANO LYING IN mE NORTH 1/2 OF mE soum 1/2 Of 'THE soumWEST 1/4 OF 'THE
SOUllj.WEST 1/4 OF SECTION I., TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY. F1..ORIDA:
COIdMENClNG AT lHE sournWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, TH~NCE RUN N67"Ja'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1.182.69
FEET AlONG mE SOUTH UNE Of SAID SECTION: lHENCE RUN NOO.49'35'"E, A DISTANCE Of 335.07 FEET ALONG A
UNE lHAT RUNS PARAlJ..EL TO THE EAST UNE OF 1l1E SOU'THWEST 1/4 Of 1liE soumWEST 1/4 TO lHE POINT OF
BEGINNING; lHENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'35-E, A DISTANCE OF 335.07 FEET ALONG A UNE RUNNING PARAlJ..EL TO THE
EAST UNE OF SAID NORlH 1/2 OF mE SOUlH 1/2 Of lHE SOU1liWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlHWEST 1/4; 1liENCE RUN
Na7.J6'J4"E. A DISTANCE OF 155.24 FEET AlONG mE NORlH UNE OF SAID NORlH 1/2 OF lHE SOUTH 1/2 OF lHE
SOUlHWEST 1/4 OF lHE SOU1liWEST 1/4: lHENCE RUN SOO'49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 335.10 FEET ALONG A UNE
THAT IS PARAl1.EL TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN S67'37'19"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.24 FEET AlONG THE SOUlH
UNE OF THE NORlH 1/2 OF 1liE SOU1li 1/2 OF lliE SOUlHWEST 1/4 OF lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO mE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
~~~
~~~
CONTAINING 51,939 SQUARE FEET OR 1.19 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
--~-- -~_J.tL~__
JAM . WILKISON (FOR lHE FIRM LB6773)
PRO SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORIDA UCENSE NQ" ~ 4676
lHIS~~AY OF~ 2004.
M.QIE;
lHE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES. AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA, EAST ZONE. '63/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4. FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL..: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: ..NW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPnON: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1...100' REV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4
OF THE SW I .. OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG NO:S€C14T-AE(AE12 SHEET: 1 Of 1
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 24 of 236
EXHIBIT~
Page....1lof r 0
PROJECT 7oeq,z I
PARCEL 907
FOLIO c>o'l/(P7(POOC>;;)...
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FL RIDA
'--
NORlH UNE Of 'THE N 1/2 Of
lHE S 1/2 Of 'THE SW 1/4 OF
lHE SW 1/4
15,02'
N87"J6'J4-E
~.,.
<'/.......
.......-
-~
Zlll
WW
~iE.,.
l's~::::-
w~~
W ~-w
~ VI~
~ ~~15
'!-J
N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SW
------ 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
.." l mUO NO.,
r:.P.&L-FLORIDA POWER & UGHT co. 00416760002
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.B,-POINT Of BEGINNING
PoO.C.-POINT OF' COMMENCEMENT SOUlH UNE Of lHE N 1/2 OF'
r lHE S 1/2 Of lHE SW 1/4 OF
lHE SW 1/4 P.OoBo
JLI
~r.
. 0
0>.
~~
z
1'167.67''- SOUlH~IN~ SECTION 14
~
~
W
~
~
8
z
J... 170'
~ F.P,&L. R/W
j;{ EASEMEN T
587.37'19.W
15.02'
P.O.C.
-{ SW CORNER OF
SECTION 14
---
N87"38'OJ"E
~.:t.:t
~;;
:::J1Il1ll
I-WW
~j;~
.... ~
DESCRIPTIOt/ OF' A 15-FooT STRIP or: LAND l'\1NG IN lHE NORlH 1/2 OF lHE SOUlH 1/2 OF lHE SOUlHWEST 1/4
OF 1liE SOUlHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlH, RANGE 26 EAST, COlUER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUlHWEST CORNER OF' SAID SECTION 14, lHENCE RUN N87"Ja'OJ"E, A DISTANCE OF 1.167.67
FEET ALONG 'THE SOUlH UNE OF SAID SECTION; lHENCE RUN NOO.49'J5.E. A DISTANCE OF 335.07 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARAllEL TO THE EAST UNE OF THE SOUlHWEST 1/4 OF lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING: lHENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'3S"r. A DISTANCE Of 335.07 FEET ALONG llfE WEST UNE Of A 170-FooT
FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARALLEL TO THE EAST UNE
Of SAID NORlH 1/2 Or: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF' THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF' THE SOUlHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
N87"36'34"e:. A DISTANCE Of 15.02 FEET ALONG lHE NORlH UNE or: SAID NORTH 1/2 OF' THE SCUlH 1/2 or: lHE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of lHE SOUlHWEST 1/4: lHENCE RUN SOO'49'35"W, A DISTANCE Of 335.07 FEET ALONG A UNE
THAT IS PARAllEL TO SAID EAST UNE: lHENCE RUN S87'37'19"W, A DISTANCE Or: 15.02 FEET ALONG lHE SOUTH
UNE OF' SAID NORTH 1/2 or: lHE SOUlH 1/2 OF lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
C~T ING 5,026 SQUARE FEET OR 0,12 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
---~ - -~~-- ~JE~ARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A AELO SURVEY OF
JAM N. WlLKlSON (FOR TI-lE FIRM LB6773) SECTION 14 BASIS OF BEARING' STATE PLA.NE
PR ONAl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER '. '/'
FLORI~~ l.ICENSE N~ Uj 4876 COORDINATE SYSTEM. FlA, EAST ZONE. 83 90,
THIS~~JOAY OF'<2at::. 2004. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BL W., SUITE 4, F"ORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 fAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL..: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAYrN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPll0N: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"..100' 10/20/04
15' UTIUTY EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4
OF THE SW 1 4 Of SEe 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No:SEC14T-AE(P12) SHEET: 1 OF' ,
Agenda Item No. iDe
May 10, 2005
Page 25 of 236
EXHIBIT ~
page~of I r;v
PROJECT 70f3Q ;1.1
PARCEl ~ 0 tf?
FOLIO 00'{/7 tfOOOtJ A
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN lliE SW 1/4 OF 'THE SW 1/4 OF SEC1l0N 14. TWP 50 S.
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY. flORIDA
\ NORni UNE OF' niE S 1/2 Of
'--- niE N 1/2 OF niE SW 1/<4 OF
niE SW 1/<4
N87."5'49"E
1!55.24'
. "..-P.O,B.
j 155.24'
S87."6'''4"W
L~
~~
15.:t,
<'>1_ J.
~~
ClIVI
WW
j!:i!:....
t...t...'
00-
~ ~~~
~ ::J 1&1
;;; t-zF
VlW
-3 i5 l5
ISE.Y:
F,P.&L-FLORIDA POWER & UGHT CO,
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.C.
+ SW CORNER OF
SECTION 1 <4
---
N87"38'03"E
w
'~> ~~
dO.
1'-....
<08
Z
11182.69''''--- SOUni -U; SECTION 14
.
l!s.:t,.:t,
~~~
~~:g
l5
-~~1HE;;';; ,"om)
PR~~~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORIDA UCENSE NO",~ 4878
nils~JbAY Of' 1L4zf:; 2004.
DESCRIPTION OF' A PARCEl OF' LAND LYING IN niE soom 1/2 OF lHE NORlH 1/2 OF lHE SOUlHWEST 1/4 OF lHE
SOUlHWEST 1;'4 OF SECTION 14. TOvn.lSHIP 50 SOUlH, RANGE 26 (1'ST, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT niE SOUniWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, lHENCE RUN N87"38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,182.69
FEET ALONG lHE SOUlli UNE OF' SAID SECTION; llfENCE RUN Noo.<49'35"E, A DISTANCE Of' 670.14 FEET ALONG A
UNf; lHAT RUNS PARALLEL TO lHE EAST UNE OF niE SOUlHWEST 1/4 OF niE SOUniWEST 1/4 TO lHE POINT Of'
BEGINNING: THENCE CONl1NUE NOO'49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 335.07 FEET ALONG A UNE RUNNING PARALLEL TO niE
EAST UNE Of' SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF" THE NORlll 1/2 OF" lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of' THE SOUlHWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN
N87.35'49"(, A DISTANCE Of' 155.24 FEET ALONG lHE NORlH UI'{( OF SAID SoolH 1/2 OF THE NORlH 1/2 OF lllE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO.49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 335.10 FEET ALONG SAID EAST
UNE: THENCE RUN S87"36'34"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.24 FEET ALONG lHE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SOUlH 1/2 Of' niE
NORni 1/2 OF lllE SOUlllWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlHWEST 1/4 TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 51,939 SQUARE FEET OR 1.19 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
t:IQIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA lED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY Of'
SECTION 14. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/,90.
n-ns IS NOT A SURVEY
~EY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COlONIAL BLW., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIOA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239}277-7179 EMAlL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
WENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. LLC ORA~ BY: JNW CHECKED BY; J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1".100' IREV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4
Of' THE SW 1/4 OF' SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG NO:SEC14T-AE(AEllJ!SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT~
Page-L.:i.of I 5"'"
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 26 of 236
PROJECT 7()"8 9;<. I
PARCEL '70 V'
FOlIO 00'11 ttf 0000 ;;<....
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF mE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S.
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA
'-
I'
" 15.02'
I N87"3S' 49-E
NORTH UNE or THE S 1/2 or
THE N 1/2 OF' THE SW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1/4
S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4
OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO,:
00417400002
r...
o
~
;I::
;"
,.,
0.
;f"
~ F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
170'
KEY:
r.p.&l.-FLORIDA POWER c!c UGHT co.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O,B,-POlNT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT or COMMENCEMENT
15'-
f----
w
i!?
0.
~
:z
I:i
ori
...,
...,
S87'36'34"W
1.--- 15.02'
SOUTH UNE Of' THE S 1/2 Of
(lliE N 1/2 or THE SW 1/4 Of'
THE SW 1/4
P.O.B. \
"-
0..,.
N.......
.......~
~~
l/)1Il
l&Jw
j!:~+
~l5::::-
w~~
~~w
t-:Zj!:
~w
Ljj!:l5
::; L'
~ ~~
z
L
w
~;,. <;> '" '"
+~~'~NER or ~ ti ~~~
SECTION 14 81;; !l! ;;
:z :J In III
I' - -.-*" ~ w w
- - - N87"3S'OJ"E 1167.67''-- SOUTH UNE SEC110N 14 w ~ ~
DESCRIPTION or A Is-rOOT STRIP or lAND LYING IN THE SOUTH 1/2 or lHE NORlH 1/2 or THE SOUlHWEST 1/4
Of lHJ: SOUlHWEST 1/4 or SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOU1lJWEST CORNER or SAlD SEC110N 14, THENCE RUN N87"38'OJ"E, A OISTANCE OF 1,167.67
FEET ALONG lHE SOUTH UNE OF' SAID SECTION; lliENCE RUN NOO'49'J5"E, A DISTANCE OF 670.14 fEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARAlJ..EL TO THE EAST UNE OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4 or llfE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT or
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'3S"E, A DISTANCE OF 335.07 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE OF A 170-FOOT
FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT COMPANY RIGHT-Dr-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARALLa TO THE EAST UNE
or SAlD SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORlH 1/2 or THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 or THE SOUlliWEST 1/4: lHENCE RUN
N87"3S'49-E, A DISTANCE or 15.02 FEET ALONG THE NORlH UNE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 Of" THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 or THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: "!HENCE RUN SOO'49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 335.07 fEET ALONG A UNE
THAT IS PARAlJ..EL TO SAID EAST UNE; lHENCE RUN S87"J6'34-W, A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH
UNE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUlHv.t;ST 1/4 Of' lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 5,026 SQUARE FEET OR 0.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
--~- --j.k!~~
JAMES ,W1L1<ISON (FOR "!HE FIRM LB677J)
PR ONAl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORlJ1/1 JJCENSE NQ" l,S 4876
THIS'-~ DAY OF !d.1:... 200-4.
tm.li;
lHE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY Of"
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/"90,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOOA TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COlONIAL BLVD.. SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAYIN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEl DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/J/04 SCALE: 1-.100' I REV: 10/20/04
15' UTIUTY EASatENT IN THE SW 1/-4
or THE SW 1/4 Of" SEe 14-50-28 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC14T-AE(Pl1) ISHEET: 1 OF 1
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 27 of 236
EXHIBIT A
page...2:.e.- of /5'0
PROJECT 7tJtYt c;l I
PARCEl -g I 0
FOLIO OtJ'I177 'J... 0009
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
INn-IE SW 1/4 OF n-IE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH LINE Of' THE S 1/2 or
mE N 1/2 Of' THE N 1/2 OF
ImE sw 1/4 OF mE SW 1/4
W:
F.P.&L.-FlORIDA POM:R & LIGHT co.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
p.O.e.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
N . , "
155.24' , /l
. ~
:;j .
. '" ~
~ F.P.&L. R/W ~ N ~
~ - EASEMENT iil ~~1oJ
W- 170' -z;!:
C)..._ I (IJ
"" z ~ . wloJ15
~~~ ~ m ~~~
0.'-"" ..,. ,,~.
o~~ b ~ ~l5~
o-:i=-< 0 . 0
n.::>w z 155.24' w~~
S8TJS'49"W ~ - w
P.O.B. In Z ~
IoJ ~~~~
. .
N~
.n~
g~
-g
Z
S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2
OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLlO NO,:
00417720009
'"
"--SOU"TH UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF
lHE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
THE SW 1/4 or THE SW 1/4
P.O.C.
-{ SW CORNER or
SECT10N 14
---
--ll
1182.69''--.- SOUTH UNE SECT10N 14
~..,...,.
0..............
~;;
:Jill'"
I-WW
~;r:j;
~
DESCRIPT10N OF A PARCEL OF LAND L'l'ING IN. THE SOUTH 1/2 OF mE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF mE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of' THE SOUmWEST 1/4 OF SECT10N 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, R"NGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY,
flORIDA:
I'
N81'38'03"E
COMMtNClNG AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER or SAID SECT10N 14, "THENCE RUN N67'38'03"E, A DISTANCE Of' 1,182.69
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE or SAID SECT10N: mENcE RUN NOO',49:35"E, A DISTANCE OF 1005.21 FEET ALONG A
LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF "THE SOUlHM:ST' 1/4 OF mE SOUTHM:ST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING: THENCE CONT1NUE NOO'49'35"E. A DISTANCE OF 167.53 FEET ALONG A LINE RUNNING PAR^LLEL TO THE
EAST LINE OF SAID soom 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORm 1/2 OF "THE SOUmM:ST 1/4 or THE
SOUlHWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN N87.35'26"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.24 ITEr ALONG THE NORTH LINE Of' SOUTH 1/2 OF
THE NORlH 1/2 Of' THE NORTH 1/2 Of" THE SOUlHWEST 1/4 Of' mE SOUTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN SOO.49'35"W, A
DISTANCE OF 167.55 fEET "LONG SAID EAST LINE: THENCE RUN S87"J5'49"W, A DISTANCE Of' 155.24 fEET ALONG
l}IE SOUTH LINE Of' SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 Of" THE NORTH 1/2 OF" lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOU1l-fWEST 1/4 TO 1l-fE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 25.969 SQUARE ITET OR 0.60 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
_k_____
l:I.QIt;
lHE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND ARE^S
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A ~ELD SURVEY OF
SECT10N 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDIN" TE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83(90,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUJ11,: 4, FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL; SURVEYlNGClCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LtC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DAlE: 8/3/04 SCALE; 1"-100' REV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4
OF lHE SW 1 4 OF SEe 14 50 26 PROJECT No: 020901 we NO:$ECI4T-AE(^El0) SHEET: 1 OF' 1
EXHIBIT A
Page~of I r:;c)
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 28 of 236
PROJE CT 70 <i1 9.<. I
PARCEL 9 I 0
FOLIO -DoLI / 71 Ol. 000 <1
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF lliE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, 1WP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COllIER COUNTY, flORIDA
NORllf UNE OF llfE S 1/2 OF
lliE N 1/2 OF llfE N 1/2 OF
I THE SW 1/4 Of THE SW 1/4
N87"J5'26WE
15,02'
15'
KEY:
F,P.&cL-F"LORrOA POWER &c UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O,B.-POINT OF' BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POlNT OF' COMMENCEMENT
S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2
OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00417720009
~
11'I
r..:
to
~
.
11'I
,.,
... F.P.&L. R!W
i EASEMENT
170'
~~
"'~
,~w
;':2;j!:
ww~
j!:j!:...
l'1 13 15 :-::-
~w~:t
OJ z ~ln
;oI"::J '"
8 ....zj!:
z VI '" ...
i:'.ij!:~:::-
P.O.B.
~
11'I
r..:
to
~
15~.z
~;;
::JVIVI
f-WW
Vlj!:j!:
i:'.i ...
o
DESCRIPTION OF A IS-FOOT SlRlP OF LAND LYING IN llfE SOUlH 1/2 OF lHE NORlH 1/2 OF' THE NORTH 1/2 OF
lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF' llfE SOUTHWEST 1/... OF SECTION 14. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUllf. RANGE 26 EAST. COWER
COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT lliE SOUlHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION H. THENCE RUN N87'J8'OJ.E, A DISTANCE OF' 1,167.67
FEET ALONG lHE SOUlH UNE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NOO."9'35.E, A DISTANCE OF 1005.21 FEET ALONG A
UNE lliAT RUNS PARALlEL TO THE EAST UNE OF' lHE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF' lHE SOUTHWEST 1/'" TO llfE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO....9.J5.E. A DISTANCE OF' 167.54 FEET ALONG lHE WEST UNE OF A 170-FOOT
flORIDA POWER AND UGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT. SAID UNE RUNNING PARALLEl TO THE EAST UNE
OF SAID SOUllf 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF' THE NORllf 1/2 OF THE SOUlHWEST 1/'" OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4;
THENCE RUN N87.3S'26.E, A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET ALONG mE NORlH UNE OF SOUlH 1/2 OF lHE NORTH 1/2
OF' llfE NORTH 1/2 OF' THE SOUTHWEST 1/... OF lHE SOUllfWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO.49'35.W, A DISTANCE OF
167,54 FEET ALONG A UNE llfAT IS PARALlEL TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN S87.35'4g.W, A OFSTANCE OF 15.02
FEET ALONG lHE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF mE NORllf 1/2 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4
OF' lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
P.O.C.
-+ SW CORNER Of
SECTION 14
---
'--SOUllf UNE OF mE S 1/2 OF' IS,02'
llfE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 Of W S87'35' 49.W
mE SW '/4 "" "" SW '14_i~ ++
/' JI-
1167.6~ SOUTH UNE SECTION 14
N87'38'03.E
CONTAINING 2.513 SQUARE FEET OR 0.06 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
rwre
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES. AND AREAS
CALCULA lID ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
--_J..~~_
N. y"U<ISON (FOR llfE FIRM L86773)
SS10NAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
DA UCENSE NO. LS .876
1..IIL DAY Of 12rl:... 200..
lHlS IS NOT A SURVEY
~EY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CLIENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1""100'
IS' UTlUlY EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4
OF lHE SW 1 4 Of SEe I+-S0-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC14T-AE(Pl0) SHEET: 1 OF 1
REV: 10/20/04
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 29 of 236
EXHIBIT A
paQe~of ,t;'l?
PROJECT 7()&'f~1
PARCEL 7 { I
FOLIO 00 L{ I (P 7i'OOOo I
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 18
IN lHE SW 1/4 OF lHE SW 1/4 OF SEC110N 14, T\\f' 50 S,
/ OF RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA
NORm UNE Of "THE N I 2
mE N 1/2 Of THE N 1/2 OF ~
"THE SW 1/4 OF "THE SW 1/4 \ NB7"35'04-E
00.16
N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
THE N 1/2 OF THE SW
1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00416800001
170'
W:
F.P.&L-FLORIOA PO~R ole UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-or-WAY
P.O,B,-POlNT or BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT or COMMENCEMENT
SB7'35'26-W
~ 40.06'
~
~8
~g
:J:
.
~.
Cn~'
~,..:
0'-
0'-
Ul
F,P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
PROPOSED 15'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
P.O.C.
SE CORNER OF
N 1/2 Of THE
N 1/2 OF THE
N 1/2 OF THE
SW 1/4 OF THE
SW 1/4
~ ~
N~
S:::-~
zZw
l.LIw~
i!:~
~~~
w~:::-
z~~
::Jzcn
I-
VlWW
~i!:~
PROPOSED
PRODUCTION
WELL NO. 1 B
UTILITY EASEMENT
P.O.B. 210.34'
S87'35'26-W S87'35'26"W
L SOUTH LINE or THE N 1/2 OF
mE N 1/2 OF mE N 1/2 or
THE SW 1/4 Of THE SW 1/4
DESCRIPTION Of A PARCEL Of LAND LYING IN lHE NORlH 1/2 OF lHE NORTH 1/2 OF'THE NORlH 1/2 OF' mE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF mE soumWEST 1/4 OF' SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COL1..IER COUNlY,
flORIDA:
COMIoAENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of SAID NORm 1/2 OF mE NORTH 1/2 OF mE NORTH 1/2 OF mE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE soumWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN S87'35'26.W, A DISTANCE OF 210.34 FEET ALONG lHE
SOUTH LINE Of SAID NORTH 1/2 OF' THE NORm 1/2 OF THE NORm 1/2 OF mE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTH'M::ST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; mENCE CONTINUE S'67.35'26'W, A DISTANCE Of 60.10 FEET ALONG
SAID SOUTH UNE; THENCE RUN NOO'49'35'E. A DISTANCE Of 167.52 FEET TO THE NORm LINE OF SAID NORm 1/2
OF' THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 Of THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of' mE SOUTH'M::ST 1/4: THENCE RUN
N87"J5'04wE, A OISTANCE Of 100.16 fEET ALONG SAID NORTIi UNE; THENCE RUN SOO'49'3S'W, A DISTANCE Of'
117.45 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF A 170-FooT FLORIDA PO'M::R AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF'-WAY
EASEMENT, A UNE lHAT IS PARALLEL TO lHE EAST LINE OF' SAID NORlH 1/2 OF THE NORlH 1/2 OF lHE NORlH
1/2 OF lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of mE SOUTH'M::ST 1/4; THENCE RUN S87'3S'26"W, A DISTANCE Of 40.06 fEET
ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARALLEL TO SAID SOUlH LINE; lHENCE RUN SOO'49'35'W, A DISTANCE OF 50.08 FEET
ALONG A UNE lHA T IS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 14,750 SQUARE FEET OR 0.34 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
____~-J~~
JAMES WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB6773)
PROFE ONAl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORI UCENSE N IFJ_
lHIS~AY OF Q6lM. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
EY C. COONER AND ASSOClA lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONiAl BLVD.. SUITE 4, FORT M't'ERS, A.ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAll: SURVE"l'INGCICOONER.COM
WENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, u.c DRAWN BY: ~W CHECKED BY: J.N,W,
PARa:L DESCRlpnON: M1.L NO. 18 DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-60' REV: 10/20/04
TEMP, CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN THE
SW 1/4 Of' THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 'M) NO:SECI4W-TCE(TCll1 SHEET: 1 OF 1
tmIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES. AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS Df BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10.2005
Page 30 of 236
EXHIBIT A
P.g.....z2.. of ( ~o
PROJECT 70~9;;z1
PARCEl <1 II
FOLIO 00 Y- If&> fS 0000 I
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 18
IN THE SW 1/4 OF lHE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2
OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.: NBT35'26-E
00416800001 40,06'
~ J
w 2:
VI UJ
&S~'/
O::F<
a.::lw
I
F.P.&l. R/W
EASEMENT
17.R'
V
L~
~~
40.06'
SB7"3S'26.W
L SOUTH LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF
THE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
170.2~
P.O.C.
SE CORNER OF
N 1/2 OF THE ~
N 1/2 or THE
N 1/2 OF THE
SW 1/4 or mE ... ~
SW 1/4 ~ ON:::-
" S:::-~
ZZI&J
l&Jl&Jj;
j;i!:15
1515~
wN......
Z......~
::J-~
....ZllJ
1Ill&Jl&J
~j;i!:
1.
UJ
.
It)
!"8
Q) ,
-:to
Oil)
o
:z
~
.
~ Il)
COt')
o .
.Q)
~,.
g
(I)
.O.B.
SBT35'2SHW
m:
F.F>.&l.-FLORIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT or COMMENCEMENT
DESCRIPllON or A PARCEL OF lAND LYING IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF mE NORTH 1/2 OF THE
SOUTHWE:ST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FlORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 or THE NDRlH 1/2 Of lHE
SOUlHWE:ST 1/4 or lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4. THENCE RUN 587"35'26"", A DISTANCE or 170.27 FEET ALONG THE
SOUlH LINE or SAID NORlH 1/2 Of THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORm 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE S87"3S'26"W. A DISTANCE or 40.06 FEET ALONG
SAID SOUTH LINE; THENCE RUN NOO.49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 50.08 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL TO THE
EAST LINE or SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 or THE NORTH 1/2 OF mE SOUTHWEST 1/4 or THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN N87"3S'2S"E, A DISTANCE OF 40.06 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL TO SAID
SOUTH LINE; THENCE RUN SOO'49'3S"W, A DISTANCE OF 50.08 FEET ALONG A 170-FOOT FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID LINE RUNNING PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE or SAID NORTH 1/2 OF 'THE
NORTH 1/2 OF' THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT or BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2.003 SQUARE fEET OR 0,05 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
ttQIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FlELO SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF' BEARING: STATE PlANE
COOROINATE SYSTEM, fLA. EAST ZONE. '83/90.
tHIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOQA lESt INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COlONIAl BLVD., SUllE.., FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCliCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ~W CHECKED BY: J,N.W,
PARCEl DESCRIPTION: WELL NO. 18 DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1.-30' I REV: 10/20/04
PRODUCTION WEll UTlUTY EASEMENT IN THE
SW 1/4 OF lHt SW 1/4 or SEe 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SECI4W-TCE(PI8j SHEET: I or 1
--~-- .14____
JM4E . WILKISON (fOR THE FIRM LB677J)
PR SIONAL SUR~YOR AND MAPPER
F1.0RID~ ~ENSE N~. l..' 4876
lHISZ't-, ~AY OF ~ 2004.
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 31 of 236
EXHIBIT-40
pq...1:.!:L of I
PROJECT 7 c) t:g:L I
PARCEl <iI1 ~
FOLIO 00'1/(,;,<1:0000 (
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF mE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S.
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA
NORTH UNE Of THE N 1/2 OF
THE N 1/2 Of lHE N 1/2 Of
I THE SW 1/4 Of THE SW 1/4
N87"-Vi'04"1"
155.24
t~
~ ~W
~-;1L
~ NN~
l1i ,~w
;zj!:
is ww~
" j!: F...
~ 13~~
w~~
Z~
:::! \oJ
t-zj!:
~wu..~
WFO~
~:
F.P.&L.-F1.ORIDA POWER'" LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P,O,B.-POINT Of' BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
l--~
N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 ~
OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 in 1-
FOLIO NO.: I
00416800001 [3 ~
:g~~
15::;~
oc>=<
0..::>10.1
F.P.&l. R/W
EASEMENT
170'
P,O,C.
-( SW CORNER Of
SEC110N 14-
---
N87"J8'03"E
~ SOUTH UNE Of THE N 1/2 OF
lHE N 1/2 Of THE N 1/2 OF
THE SW 1/4 Of THE SW 1/4 1 in::;
....,.,
N~
I,,,~... '- ~rn -UHE t: ,~
.!'"
It)
,.,
0.
:t
~ 155.24'
\ 581.35 26 W
'- P.O.B,
t-
.........
0'"'"
~~~
~~~
~
DESCRIP110N OF A PARCEL Of LAND LYING INlHE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORlH 1/2 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTH'M::ST 1/4 OF SEC110N 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY,
flORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, lHENCE RUN NS7"3S'OJ"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,182,69
FEET ALONG THE SOUlH UNE Of SAlD SEC110N; THENCE RUN NOO'>t9'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 1172.75 fEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF THE SOUlHWEST 1/4 Of THE SOUlH'M::ST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 167.53 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARAu.EL TO
lHE EAST UNE Of SAID NORlH 1/2 OF THE NORlH 1/2 OF THE NORlH 1/2 OF lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lHE
SOUlHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN N8r35'Q4"r. A DISTANCE OF 155.24 fEET ALONG THE NORlH UNE Of SAID NORlH
1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 Of THE NORlH 1/2 Of THE SOUlHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
SOO.49'JS"W. A DISTANCE Of 167.55 fEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE: lHENCE RUN S67"3S'26"W, A DISTANCE OF
155.24 FEET ALONG lHE SOUTH UNE Of SAlO NORlH 1/2 OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF lHE NORlH 1/2 Of' lHE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 25,969 SQUARE FEET OR 0.60 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
J;~-- . WllKISi~F;~~ LB6773)
PR SIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
F1. ~A hCENSE NO, LS 4876
lHI5 AY OF' c.Lt:::. 2004. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI AlES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLW., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EM AIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, u.c DRAYtt4 BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DAlE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN lHE SW 1/4
Of' THE SW 1/4 OF' SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC14T-AE(AEII) SHEET: 1 OF 1
t:l.Qre
THE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS Of' BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM. FtA. EAST lONE. '63/90.
EXHIBIT ---tL
Page 2.f of ~
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 32 of 236
PROJECT 7t:)<gq~1
PARCEl 9/ ;}..
F OLI 0 C)o <f I b '? OOO,(J (
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
~:
F.P.&L-FLORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O,B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O. C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2
OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
Falla NO.:
00416800001
NORTH UNE OF THE N 1/2 OF N8T,'55'04"E
THE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF V-'502'
I THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 j .
- f--1S'
;., !"
It) It)
,..: n
'" ~ F.P.&L. R/W
w is EASEMENT
~ ~ 170'
;"
.,.
is
P.O.a. ~
;.,
on
,..:
co
L'
~~
~t
NN<fJ
w';'w
~ ;zif
;" w~~
;<t- if f= .,.
~ t;~~
w~~
z_
::J w
I-::l'.:if
3~t;~
<~
~-t-t
~;;
::Jlnln
I-ll.IW
~ifif
W ~
DESCRIPTION OF A 15-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN THE NORlH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14. TO~SHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER
COUNTY, FLORIDA:
"
SOUTH UNE OF' THE N 1/2 OF 15.02'
THE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF ll.I "-- S87"J5'26"W
SECTION 14
_ _ _ N87.,'58'03"E I 1167.67'
'-- SOUTH UNE SECTION 14
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECllON 14, THENCE RUN N87"38'OJ"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,167.67
FEET ALONG lHE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECTION: THENCE RUN N0ct'49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 1172,75 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARAUEl TO THE EAST UNE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTliWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO.49','5S"E. A DISTANCE OF 167.53 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE OF A 170-FOOT
FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARALLEl TO THE EAST UNE
OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORlH 1/2 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4;
THENCE RUN N87.35'04"E. A DISTANCE OF 15,02 FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH
1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; mENCE RUN SOO.49'3S"W, A DISTANCE
OF 167.53 FEET AlONG A UNE THAT IS PARAllEL TO SAID EAST UNf; mENCE RUN S87.3S'26"W, A DISTANCE OF
15.02 FEET AlONG mE SOUTH UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF" mE NORm 1/2 OF mE NORTH 1/2 OF" mE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2.513 SQUARE FEET OR 0.05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~ j !IDlE;
~~ THE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES. AND AREAS
---- !:1':=1._____________ CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
JAM N, WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB677J) SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STA~ PLANE
PR SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER COORDINA TE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, 83;90.
FL IDA UCENSE NO. LS 4876
lHlS ~DAY OF ~004. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 fAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN. ll.C DRAWN BY: .liW CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1".100' REV: 10/20/04
15' U11UTY EASD.IENT IN lHE SW 1/4
OF mE SW 1)4 OF SEC 1-4-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG NO:SECHT-AE(P9) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Page~ of J (('0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 33 of 236
PROJECT 7tJ~<t;l1
PARCEL <613
FOLIO 00'11 'O;J..C>()OO 7
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN mE NW 1/4 OF mE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
NORTH UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF mE
S 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF mE SW 1/4 ~
KEY:
f.P.&L-FlORIDA POWER Ie UGHT co.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O,C.-POINT OF COMUENCEl.AENT
~ "''''OSED~ "
UTILITY 0
EASEMENT ~
~
~
N~
~~
Ill').
wJ:
FZ
lS~~
1tJ~').
:Z:~J:
~1Il1ll
CIlItJItJ
l5iEF
~
l!l
~
~
S 1/2 OF mE S 1/2 OF
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00418200007
F.P.&L. R/W
L EASEMENT
1-170'
b
~
W
~
en
'!"
8
Z
SOUTH LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE S 1/2 Of NW 1/4 OF nlE
SW 1/4
P.O.B.
155.24'
S87.35'04"W
P.O.C, IS ~ ~
I(~C=~: OF _ _ _ ~;~
--f. - N87'38'OJ"E ,; m1Z.59' "'--- SOUnl UNE SECTION 14 w 0
DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF nlE SOUTH 1/2 Of THE NORmWEST 1/4 OF mE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SEcnON 14, TO"""SHIP 50 soum, RANGE 26 EAST, COLUER COUNn', flORIDA:
COMMENONG AT mE SOUnlWEST CORNER Of SAIO SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N87"38'03"E, A OISTANCE Of 1,182.69
FEET ALONG mE soum UNE Of SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NOO.49'35"E. A DISTANCE OF 1340.28 FEET ALONG ^
UNE mAT RUNS PARALLEL TO mE EAST UNE Of mE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of mE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO mE POINT OF
BEGINNING; mENCE CONTINUE NOO.49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 335.07 FEET ALONG A UNEmAT RUNS PARALLEl TO
THE EAST UNE OF SAID soum 1/2 or THE soum 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF" mE SOUTHWEST 1/4: mENCE
RUN N87"34'19"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.24 FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE Of SAID SOUTH 1/2 Of THE soum 1/2 OF
THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF mE SOUTHWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN SOO'49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF" 335.10 FEET ALONG SAID
EAST UNE: mENCE RUN S87"3S'04"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.24 FEET ALONG mE SOUTH UNE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF
THE soum 1/2 OF mE NORlHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TOlHE POINT Of BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 51.939 SQUARE fEET OR 1.19 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
:;:..--%~(;o;n;{~;~ "0"')
PRi:~~~L SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
flORIDA UI<ENSE NO,-,Ul 4876
mls..z:L """'AY Of Ut4:::: 2004.
l:l.QIE;
nlE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '8J/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOClA TE5, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD.. SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, F1.0RIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREEl..EY AND HANSEN, LLC ORA'^'" BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J,N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPll0N: DATE: 8/J/04 SCALE: 1".100. REV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN lHE NW 1/4
Of mE SW 1 4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC14T-O\E(AEB) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Page 11.. of Il)D
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 34 of 236
PROJECT 70"5 Cf.2./
PARCEL cr /:3 R
FOLIO 0041 <;/;1. 0000 7
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECllON 14, nYP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA
NORTH UNE OF lliE S 1/2 OF lliE
S 1/2 OF N 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 ,
'"
C!.
I w. ...
. ..., N
:~ 0
I 0 ~
~~ on
I- IOO'l ;;; F.P.&:L. R/W ~
I <i! :z: EASEMENT ~15
I ~ S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF 15' -...
~ VJ:::--
u NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 I() w~
li) :II:: I FOUO NO,: b: j!::z:
en W ~ ~~...
w 00416200007 w ~
0:: 0:: I .
<J u ~ ~ :z: w~:::-
z ~ ... ?i-~
0 8 i ....CIlCll
(f) SOUTH UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF ~ww
0:: ::z: wj!:j!:
W ( THE S 1/2 Of NW 1/4 Of THE 15.02'
a
~ SW 1/4 587"35'04"W
:r: P.O.B.
N87"38'03"E
I'
1167.67'
'- SOUlli UNE SECTION 104
15-t-t
~;;
::JCIllll
....ww
1Ilj!:j!:
~ u.
o
11.0::
C.R. - COUNTY ROAD
f.P.&L-FtORIDA POWER c!c UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O,C,-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR OESCRIPl1ON
riQ.lE;
~ WE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA lED ARE BASED ON A RELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
:;;;.- N. -MU<l~ LB6773) COORIllNA IE ",""', Fl.A. EAST Z_ 'OJ/,,,,,
PR SSlONAl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
~t1:~~~S~N~&~5. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFkEY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE -f, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl; SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAWN BY: ..tfW CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPnON: DAlE: B/3/04 SCALE: 1".100' REV: 3/17/05
unuTY EASEMENT IN lHE NW 1/4
OF lHE SW 1 4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SECl4T-AE(P8 SHEET: t OF 2
EXHIBIT*
Pall.....l[of f?
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 35 of 236
PROJECT 7 0 ~q;z I
PARCEL Cf/31<..
FOLIO OOt!r'l!;l.COoC' 7
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A UTILITY EASEMENT
IN lHE NW 1/4 OF lHE SW 1/4 OF SECl10N 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER CQUNT'f, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION Of A SlRlP Of LAND LYING IN TIiE SOU'TH 1/2 Of TIiE SOUTIi 1/2 Of TIiE NORTIiWEST 1/4 Of 'THE
SOUTIiWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOU'TH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNlY, R.ORIDA:
COMMENCING AT TIiE SOUTIiWEST CORNER Of SAID SECTION 14, TIiENCE RUN N87"38'03"(, A DISTANCE OF 1,167.67
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE Of SAID SECTION; 'THENCE RUN NOO.49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 1340.28 FEET ALONG A
UNE mAT RUNS PARAU.El TO lHE E,A,ST UNE Of 'THE SOU'THWEST 1/4 Of 'THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO mE POINT OF
BEGINNING; lHENCE CONTINUE Noo.49'35"E, A DISTANCE Of 315.02 FEET ALONG mE WEST UNE OF ,A, 170-FooT
R.ORIOA POWER AND UGHT RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARAlLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF SAID
soum '/2 Of THE SOUTH 1/2 Of 'THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: lHENCE RUN 587'J4"9"W, A
DISTANCE Of 1066.72 FEET ALONG A UNf TH,A,T IS 20 fEET soum Of (AS ME,A,SURED AT RIGHT ANGlES) AND
PARALLEL TO mE NORTH UNE Of SAID soum 1/2 OF lHE SOUTH 1/2 Of lHE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN Noo"50'''"E, A DISTANCE OF 20,03 FEET TO SAID NORm UNE; THENCE RUN
N87"34'19"[, A DISTANCE Of 1082,05 FEET ,A,LONG SAID NORTH UNE; THENCE RUN SOO.49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF
335.07 FEET ALONG A UNE lHAT RUNS PARALlEL TO SAID EAST UNE: THENCE RUN S87.35'04"W, A DISTANCE Of
15.02 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE Of SAID soum 1/2 Of THE SOUTH 1/2 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF mE
SOUlHWEST 1/4 TO mE POINT Of BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 26,416 SQUARE FEET OR 0.61 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
FOR SKETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVE'l'ING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAlL: SURVE'l'INGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAWN BY: JNW CHECt<ED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEl DESCRIPnON: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: REV: 3/17/05
UTIUTY EASEMENT IN lHE NW 1/4
OF THE SW 1)4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWO No:SEC14T-AE(P8 SHEET; 2 OF 2
EXHIBIT--LL
Page ~q of (f)O
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
PROJECT 7tJ#f~e/6 of 236
PARCEl <61l/ _
FOLIO oO'-l{~~'IO()09
w
r-.in
P.O.C. :rib: 15 ~-t
+~c~:N~~ OF ~~ ~;;
Z ::JWIll
--- V: -- ~j!:~
N67'36'03"E 1162.69' "-- S:TH UNE SECnON 14 i:'l ~
DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORmWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TO\IfNSHIP 50 SOUlH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
\ NORTH UNE OF THE N 1/2 OF
'---- lHE S 1/2 OF mE NW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1/4
N67"33'34"E
155.24'
r-.
o
&ri
I')
I')
N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00418240009
F.P,&L R/W
EASEMENT
-170'
P.O.B.
155,24'
Sfl7.34'19"W
~
~
~
b
:4
I')
15~
<<'
,~
~~
:z:;Z
w.....
iEj!:~
~l5">
...~~
z~
::J W
I-Iflj!:
IIlW
~iE15
COMMENCING AT lHE SOUlHWEST CORNER Of SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N67'38'03"E, A orSTANCE OF 1182.69
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECTION; lHENCE RUN NOO'49'3S"E, A orSTANCE OF 1675.37 FEET ALONG A
UHE lHAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 335.07 FEET ALONG A UNE RUNNING PARAu.EL TO THE
EAST UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN
N87"33'34"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.24 FEET ALONG lHE NORlH UNE OF SAID NORlH 1/2 OF lHE SOUlH 1/2 OF THE
NORlHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: lHENCE RUN SOO'49'J5"W, A DISTANCE OF 335.10 FEET ALONG lHE EAST
UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF lHE SOUlH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN
S87.34'19"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.24 FEET ALONG lHE SOUTH UNE OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE
NORlHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 51,939 SQUARE FEET OR 1.19 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
liQl[;
lHE PARCEL BEARING, OISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A flEW SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STAlE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, 'B3/"90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOOAlES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAl BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEy AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ~W CHECI<ED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1".100' REV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN l1-1E NW 1/4
OF THE SW 1 4 Of' stc 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No:SECI4T-AE(AE7) SHEET: 1 Of" 1
-~--------
. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB6773)
PR SlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FL \ UCENSE Nq., ~S 4876
lHIS ~OAY OF'~ 2004.
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 37 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Pag.....1e...of /i)()
PROJECT 7 t) 61 ;..1
PARCEL 9 I if
FOLIO 00'/1'5;1.. '1000 '1
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FlORIDA
N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO,;
00418240009
r-.
o
~
15.02'
N67"33'34"E
~
~
a.
i
\ NORTH LINE OF mE N 1/2 OF
"---- THE S 1/2 Of THE NW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1/4
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
-170'
~....
"'.......
.......-
-~
ZZ
lJJ wW
~ ~~....
a. L4. ~:::-
;t 0 i!::
8 W~ln
z ~-w
I-cn~
VIlLI
~iE15
ISEX:
f.P.lleL-FlORIDA POWER lie UGHT co.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
p.O.e.-POlNT Of BEGlNNING
P.O.C.-POlNT or COMMENCEMENT
SOUll-4 LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF
(THE S 1/2 OF ll-4E NW 1/4 Of
mE SW 1/4 p.o.a,
lJJ
~~ 15~~
+~~~N~ Of ~~ ~;;
g- ~WVl
_ _ _ N87"36'03"[ 1167.67' _ _ z _ In ~ ~
/' "--- SOUTH LINE SECTION 14 i:-i ~
DESCRIPTION OF A 15-FOOT STRIP Of LAND LYING IN THE NORTH 1/2 Of THE SOUTH 1/2 OF ll-4E NORTHWEST 1/4
OF THF/ SOUmYlEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 soom, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, flORIDA:
15'
...
~
a.
~
z
r-.
o
.0
~
S87"34'19"W
15.02'
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTl!WEST CORNER Of SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N67"38'03"[. A DISTANCE OF 1,167.67
fEET AlONG lHE SoolH LINE Of SAID SECTION; mENCE RUN NOO.49'3S"E, A DISTANCE OF 1675.35 FEET ALONG A
LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF mE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO mE POINT Of
BEGlNNING: lHENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 335.07 FEET ALONG mE WEST LINE OF A 170-FOOT
flORIDA POWER AND UGHT COMPANY RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARALlEL TO THE EAST UNE
OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF mE NORmWEST 1/4 Of THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
N87'33'34"[. A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET ALONG Tl!E NORTH UNE Of SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF lHE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; llfENCE RUN SOO.49'3S"W. A DISTANCE OF 335.07 FEET ALONG A UNE
llfAT IS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE; ll-IENCE RUN Sa7"34'lg"W, A DISTANCE Of 15.02 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH
UNE Of' lHE NORTl! 1/2 OF Tl!E SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHVtEST 1/4 Of llfE SOUll-IVtEST 1/4 TO THE POINT Of'
BEGlNNING.
CONT INING 5.026 SQUARE FEET OR 0.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
- _~L~ ~~~ARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS Of' BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM. FlA. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., sum:: 4, fORT MYERS, Fl.ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 fAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DATE: a/3/D4 SCALE: t"-100' REV: 10/20/04
t5' Ul1UTY EASEMENT IN llfE NW 1/4
OF lHE SW 1 4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SECI4T-AE(P7) SHEET: 1 OFI
. WlU<ISON (fOR THE FIRM LB6773)
PR SlONAl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
Fl IDA UCENSE No.. l,S 4876
THIS ~AY Of' ~ 2004,
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 38 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Page~of I c;O
PROJECT 70'69 :/..,1
PARCEl ~,(;'
FOLIO O~'1I('~ C>{Jt>,p 7
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FlORIDA
N87"32' 49"E
155.24'
\ NORTH LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF
"'--- THE N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1/4
I ~ €
S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF ~ ...
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 ~ F.P.&L. R/W ~
FOLIO NO.: 0 l- ~ EASEMENT
00416600007 ..... 2: - 170'
~: ~~~
F,P.&:L-FLORIOA POWER &: LIGHT CO. ~ 2~ ~
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY "- ::J W 10
P.O.B.-POINT or BEGINNING q b:
P.O.C.-POINT or COMMENCEMENT ':"
· 8
(SOUTH UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF %
THE N 1/2 or THE NW 1/4 OF P OB
THE SW 1/4 rl. . .
155.24'
~ S87.33'34"W
<~< ~~
0*
~8
Z
-fP'O'C'
SW CORNER or
_ SECTION 14
N67"36'03"[
/'
1162.69'
--17
'--- SOUTH UNE SECTION 14
t'
,W
J..
Ll.
0..-
....:-::.-
:-::.-~
Vlz
WW
j!;;!:...
lsls:-::'-
_ w~~
o %~
. ::J W
It) I-%j!;
::J ~;gls
N
~
t5~~
~;;
::Jwll!
I-:r::w
lIIf."j!;
~ l5
DESC~IPTI~ or A PARCEL Of' LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 or SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COlliER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER or SAID SECnON 14, THENCE RUN N67"38'03"E, A DISTANCE DF 1,162.69
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF' SAID SEcnON; THENCE RUN NOO.49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 2,010,42 FEET AlONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARAllEL TO THE EAST UNE Of' THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE Noo.49'35"[, A DISTANCE or 335.07 FEET ALONG A LINE RUNNING PARAllEL TO THE
EAST UNE or SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 or THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
N87.32'49"E, A DISTANCE or 155.24 FEET AlONG THE NORTH UNE or SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO'49'J5"W, A DISTANCE OF 335,10 FEET ALONG THE EAST
UNE OF' SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF mE NORm 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of' THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
S67.33'34"W, A DISTANCE Of' 155.24 FEET AlONG THE soum LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF lHE
NORTH~ST 1/4 Of lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING.
~NT ININO 51,939 SQUARE FEET OR 1.19 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~ tmJ:f;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES. AND AREAS
---- --- ------ - CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY Of'
JAME N. WILKISON (FOR lHE FIRM LB6773) SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
PR SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER COORDINA TE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE. '83/,90.
FLORIDA LICENSE No".. L5- 4876
lHtS ~AY Of' ~ 2004. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVE'r1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 fAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE'r1NGCCOONER.COM
ClIENT: GREEILY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1".100' I REV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE NW 1/4
Of' THE SW 1/4 Of SEC H-50-26 PROJECT No; 020901 OWG NO:SECl4T-AE(AE8)ISHEET: t OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Pag e .....1.!?:.. of J;- 0
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
PROJE CT 1''' g qaa?9 of 236
PARCEL q I5*'
FOLIO 00 '-{ I t, Ie, 0000 7
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC1l0N 14. TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E. COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00416600007
l-.
o
~
I\. 15.02'
I -- H87'32' 49"E
~
0.
~
~
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
170'
t~
~~
\ NORTH UNE OF' THE S 1/2 Of'
"--- THE N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 Of'
THE SW 1/4
s
~
~....
N~ /..
~~
(IIz
..,w
~~....
~ ~~~
~ ..,~~
;f" 3~
8 I-z~
:j~~
KEY:
F.P.&L.-F1..ORIDA POWER & UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF'-WAY
P.O,B.-POlHT OF BEGINNING I'"
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT :q
SOUTH UNE OF niE S 1/2 oF ~
(THE N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF 8 S87.33'J4"W
THE SW 1/4 P.O.S, -\ r-' 15.02'
~~ .~
-+ ~~'gORNER Of ~ g I 15 ~ ~
SEClION 14 8 ~ ~ ; ~
N87"38'03"E 1167.67' Z ~ ~..,
^ _-- 'T ~F~
- - - V . "-- SOUTH UNE SECllON 14 ~
DESCRIPllON OF A 15-FOOT SffilP OF LA.ND LYING IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF niE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4
OF lljE SOUniWEST 1/4 OF SECllON 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST. COWER COUNTY. F1..ORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUll-IWEST CORNER OF SAID SECllON 14, ll-IENCE RUN N87'38'03"E, A DISTANCE Of 1,167.67
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN N00"49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 2,010.42 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARAlllL TO THE EAST UNE OF ll-IE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUll-lWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; ll-IENCE CONllNUE NOO'49'35"E. A DISTANCE OF 335.07 FEET ALONG ll-IE WEST UNE Of A 170-FooT
F1..ORIDA POWER AND UGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARAlllL TO THE EAST UNE
OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF' niE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: lllENCE RUN
N87"32'49"E. A DISTANCE OF' 15.02 FEET ALONG ll-IE NORlll UNE OF' SAID SOUlll 1/2 OF' THE NORTH 1/2 OF lllE
NORTHWEST '/4 OF' THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN SOO'49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF' 335.07 FEET ALONG A UNE
THAT IS PARAUEL TO niE EAST UNE OF' SAID SOUlH 1/2 OF THE NORlll 1/2 Of lllE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF ll-IE
SOUTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN S87.33'34"W, A DISTANCE Of 15.02 FEET ALONG lllE SOUTH UNE OF ll-IE SOUni 1/2
OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF lllE NORlHWEST 1/4 OF ll-IE SOU11iWEST 1/4 TO 1liE POINT OF' BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 5.026 SQUARE ITEr OR 0,12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
-JA-~N-'-':LK--IS~OH-:P(-F--O'R--TH-E--A-R:: L8677") ~r:~ARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
m M'" CAlCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
PR SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SEClION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
~:I~~ .)t~i~~~~~4. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4. FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EM AIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N,W,
PARCEL DESCRIPll0N: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: '".100' REV: 10/20/04
15' UllUTY EASEMENT IN THE NW 1/4
Of lllE SW 114 OF SEe 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SE:C14T-AE(P6) ISHEET: 1 OF 1
15'-
-
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 40 of 236
EXHIBIT A
P..g.~of I t:;O
PROJECT 706'1:l/
PARCEl 71 ~
F Oll 0 0(;)(1-/ q,;z '6 000 !
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
30' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S.
RGE 26 E, COLlIER COUNTY, FlORIDA
EXlSTlNG ROAD AND UTlUTY_
~T o.Jf.10987159
N87"32'04"E
1066.75'
PROPOSED
UTILITY EASEMENT
N87'32'04"E
NORTH LINE Of THE SW 1/4
.J
<
~
~
5
~'io
~~
~g
8,14.1
:t::t:
::J
I~
Ii
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
W
~""N lq
;jE-~~ *
...~., b
"'0 _ 0
F!:~II!~. :t:
~_~ III
...%l!il!l~
3~~~~
t;~....
~ z""
S87.J2'04"W
1066.76'
z
o
VI
ffi
c
li
:I:
N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00418280001
S UNE SECTlON 14
170'
N87'3S'D3"E _
1167.67'
Kf)::
F.P.&L-FlORIOA POWER & LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
DESCRIPTION OF A 3D-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYlNG IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 1<4, TOI'INSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY. flORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14. mENCE RUN N67'36'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,167.67
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NOO'49'3S"E, A DISTANCE OF 2620.46 FEET ALONG A
LINE mAT RUNS PARAllEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF mE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE RUN S67'32'04"W, A DISTANCE OF 1066.76 fEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARAlLEL TO mE
NORTH LINE Of THE SOUmWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTlON TO THE EASf RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF COUNTY ROAD 951:
THENCE RUN NOO150'''"E, A DISTANCE OF 30.05 FEET ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-Of-WAY UNE; THENCE RUN
N87'32.04"E, A DISTANCE OF 1066.75 FEET ALONG A LINE mAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE Of THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION, SAID UNE ALSO BEING mE SOUTH UNE OF A 30-FooT ROAD AND UllUTY
EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OmCIAL RECORDS BOOK 1098, PAGE 159, PUBUC RECORDS OF COLUER COUNTY,
flORIDA; THENCE RUN SOO'49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 30.06 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE OF A 170-FooT flORIDA
POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE Of SAID NORTH 1/2
Of THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 32,004 SQUARE FEET OR 0.73 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
t:fQIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A AELO SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM. F1.A. EAST ZONE. '83/90,
nus IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY c. COONER AND ASSOCI A TE5, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD,. SUIlt: 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EM AIL: SURI/EYlNGGCOONER,COM
CLIENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ~W CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPll0N: DAlt:: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 9/13/04
TEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN THE
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 Of' SEC 14 50 26 PROJECT No: 020901 owe No: SECI4T-AE(TC5) SHEET: 1 OF 1
~Jr-v-
--- ----------.---------
JAM N, WILKISON (FOR THE ARM LB6773)
PR SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORu:l^,-UCENSE NQ.. L~ 4676
THIS ~OAY Of ~ 2004.
EXHI8IT~
page.2Lof'fifl)
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
PAge 41 of 236
PROJECT 7011..., ~ (
PARCEL ~ lIP
FOLIO 00'1' ~ ;;:zcg 000 I
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
N LINE OF OF lHE N 1/2 RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
OF iHE N 1/2 OF iHE
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
'b
-
500.49'J5"W
10.02'
NOO'49'J5"E
10.02'
Na7'J2'04"E
155.26'
g 5a7.32'04 W
N8T3Z'04"E 155.26'
N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00418280001
I
a .....1
w z
~~~
~::;~
0::1=<(
ll.::::lW
\1
N
o
~
8
~
~.
('01....... ~
~;
ZZ ~
WW 1IJ
FF~F~
~13';:-~~
~~~~~
:J-1IJ:J1IJ
~~FIiiF
WF~~~
170'
Ii ~
~
8
Z
F,P,&L. R/W
EASEMENT
P.O.C.
SW CORNER OF [S LINE SECTION 14
SECTION 14
Na7'Ja'03"E 1182.69'
S LINE OF THE N 1/Z
Of fHE N 1/2 OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 .
P.O..~. 11
587"32' 49"W 155.24'
KEY:
F.P,c!cL-FLORIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B,-POlNT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C,-POlNT OF COMMENCEMENT
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
tiQIE;
THE PARca BEARING, DISTANCES,
AND AREAS CALCUlA lED ARE BASED
ON A FlELD SURVEY OF SECTION 14.
BASIS OF BEARING: STAlE PlANE
COORDINATE SYS1D.l, FLA. EAST
ZONE. '83/90,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
~EY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A lES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGClCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN. llC DRAWN BY: ....W CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-60' REV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN lHE NW 1/"-
Of' mE SW 1 4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC14T-AE(AEll) SHEET: 1 Of 2
~~-----
JAMES . WILKISON (FOR THE FlRM LB6773)
PROFt ONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORIDA LICENSE NO... l$ 4876
lH1S ~A Y OF <.2d:::; 2004.
EXHIBIT A
Page-u"of {5"0
Agenda Item No.1 DC
May 10. 2005
Page 42 of 236
PROJECT 'loft 9 ;1./
PARCEL .g L 10
FOLIO 001./1 g ;2..'€ooo I
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN mE NW 1/4 OF mE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION OF PARCELS OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of' THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, FlORIDA:
(l)COMMENONG AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N87"38'03"E. A DISTANCE OF
1,182.69 tEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NOO.49.35"E, A DISTANCE OF 2345.49 tEET
ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO lHE EAST UNE OF THE WEST 1/2 Of' THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING: lHENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 305.02 tEET ALONG A UNE RUNNING PARALLEL TO
THE EAST UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF lHE NORTH 1/2 OF ll-lE NORlHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUll-lWEST 1/4; lHENCE
RUN N87"32'04"E. A DISTANCE OF 155.26 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARALLEL TO ll-lE NORll-l UNE OF SAID
NORlH 1/2 Of' THE NORm 1/2 OF mE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF mE SOUll-lWEST 1/4; mENCE RUN SOO'49'35"W, A
DISTANCE OF 305.06 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN S87"32'49"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.24 FEET ALONG
THE SOUlH UNE OF' THE NORlH 1/2 Of' THE NORTH 1/2 OF' THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, TO THE
POINT OF BEGiNNING,
AND,
(2)COMMENONG AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N87"3B.OJ"E. A DISTANCE OF
1,182.69 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECl1ON: THENCE RUN NOO.49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF' 2670.54 FEET
ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT
OF' BEGiNNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'J5"E, A DISTANCE OF 10,02 FEET ALONG SAID UNE; THENCE RUN
N87"J2'04"E. A DISTANCE OF 155.26 FEET ALONG THE NORm UNE OF' SAID NORTH 1/2 OF' THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF lHE soumWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO'49'J5"W, A DISTANCE OF 10.02 FEET ALONG SAID EAST
UNE; THENCE RUN S87"J2'04"W, A DISTANCE Of' 155.26 F'EET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARAL1.EL TO THE NORTH
UNE Of' SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF' THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF' THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF'
BEGiNNING,
CONTAINING 48,834 SQUARE FEET OR 1.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
FOR SKETa-l
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAlL: SURVE)1NGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAVtN BY; ~W CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCAlE: NA REV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEt.lENT IN lHE NW 1/4
OF THE SW 1-'4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC14T-AE(AE!l) SHEET: 2 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
Page 3" of {'5"O
Agenda Item No.1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 43 of 236
PROJECT l/)'aCf:2./
PARCEL 9/ (p
FOLlO OOLfI'6~~OOOI
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH UNE OF THE SW 1/4
b
~ 587"31 04 W
~
I~~
I::J~
~If)
IXffi
~~
b
N
'"
o
~
'"
o
.0
g
N87"32'04"E 155.28'
~
S87.J2'04"W 155.26'
F,P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
170'
8'
o;J
.........
:t'
~
S UNE or THE N 1/2
or THE N 1/2 OF lHE
NW 1/4 OF mE SW 1/4
jI:
~
~
~'O'C'
SW -CORNER OF
SECllON 14
~38'03"E _
S UNE SECll0N 14
b1~
'0/;11)
II) n
1t -
n OJ
('oj :t'
8
z
Nw~~1
~~----
z~~jI:~
w w~
j!:~~j!:~
~;~~~
3~~3~
w~~~
N 1/2 Of THE N 1/2 OF THE
NW 1/4 Of THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO,:
00418280001
1167.67'
W:
f.P.&L-FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P,O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P,O.C.-POlNT Of COMMENCEMENT
SEE SHEET 2 Of 2
fOR DESCRIPTION
~ l:iQIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEYor
;~~- . -;tX~d~~ 186773) SECllON 14, BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PlANE
PRO SlONAl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
~:1~~~~~~~~4. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BlVD.. sum: 4, FORT MYERS, F1..0RIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAll: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
ClIENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRA~ BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 10/20/04
UTIUlY EASEMENT IN THE NW 1/4
Of 'THE SW 1 4 Of SEe 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: SECI4T-AE(P5) SHEET: 1 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
P.ge....rL of '5"0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 44 of 236
PROJECT loge; ~I
PARCEl or I (p
FOLIO OO'f/~;;"g'oool
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A UTILITY EASEMENT
IN mE NW 1/4 OF mE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION Of A STRIP OF LAND LYING IN mE NORm 1/2 Of lHE NORTH 1/2 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COMMENONG AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Of SAID SECTION 14, mENCE RUN N87"38'03"E, A DISTANCE Of 1,167.67
FEET ALONG mE SOUTH LINE Of SAID SECTION: THENCE RUN NOO'49'35"E, A DISTANCE Of 2345,49 FEET ALONG A
LINE THAT RUNS PARAUEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 Of THE soumWEST 1/4 TO ruE POINT OF
BEGINNING: ruENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'35"E, A DISTANCE Of 305.02 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE Of A 170-FooT
flORIDA POWER AND UGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARALlEl TO THE EAST UNE Of SAID
NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 Of lHE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE soumWEST 1/4: ruENCE RUN S87"32.04"W, A
DISTANCE OF 1066.75 FEET ALONG A LINE ruAT RUNS PARAL1..EL TO mE NORTH UNE Of' mE SOUruWEST 1/4 OF
SAID SECTION, SAID UNE AlSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF A 30-FOOT ROAD AND UTIUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED
IN OfflOAL RECORDS BOOK 1098, PAGE 170, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA, RUNNING TO ruE EAST
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE HENDERSON CREEK CANAL; THENCE RUN NOO'50'44"E, A DISTANCE Of 20.03 FEET
AlONG SAID EAST RIGHT-Or-WAY UNE: THENCE RUN N87"32'O"'"E, A DISTANCE OF 1066.74 fEET ALONG A UNE
THAT RUNS PARAllEL TO THE NORTli UNE Of TliE SOUTliWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION: TliENCE RUN NOO.49'35"E, A
DISTANCE OF 10.02 FEET ALONG SAID WEST UNE OF SAID 170-FOOT flORIDA POWER AND UGHT RIGHT-Of-WAY
EASEMENT TO SAID NORTH UNE; TliENCE RUN N87"32'04'E, A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FUT ALONG SAID NORlH UNE:
ruENCE RUN SOO.49'3S"W, A DISTANCE OF 10,02 FEET ALONG A UNE lHAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE:
TliENCE RUN N87"32'04'E, A DISTANCE OF 155.26 fEET ALONG A UNE mAT IS PARALlEL TO SAID NORlH LINE;
TliENCE RUN SOO.49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 20.03 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE; TliENCE RUN S87.J2'04"W. A
DISTANCE OF 155.26 fEET ALONG A UNE lHAT IS PARALlEL TO SAID NORTH LINE; lHENCE RUN SOO'49'35'W, A
DISTANCE Of 305.02 FEET ALONG A UNE lHAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE: lHENCE RUN S87"32'49"W. A
DISTANCE Of 15,02 FEET ALONG mE soum LINE Of SAID NORlH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF TliE NORlHWEST 1/4
Of mE SOUlHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 29,466 SOUARE FEET OR 0.68 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
FOR SKETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND AssoaA lES, INC.
SURVEY1NG AND MAPPING
J900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUIn:: 4, FORT MYERS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, UC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N,W,
PARCEl DESCRIPllON: DAn::: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1'-109. I REV: 10/20/04
UTIUTY EAsaAENT IN THE NW 1/4 p",
OF lHE SW '/4 OF SEe 14 50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SECI4T-AE(P5A1SHEET: 2 OF 2
EXHIB1T -;to
page~of f r;-
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10. 2005
Page 45 of 236
PROJECT 70 caLj ':1./
PARCEL 71 7 R.
FOlIO 0041 <:t'l 0000 I
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
30' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECllON 14. TWP 50 S.
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY. FLORIDA
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
NORTH UNE Of THE W 1/2 Of THE
W 1/2 OF ll'IE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
EXIS11NG ROAD AND U11UTY
N87"32'O:fE--u.S~,(lf.lt 1O!f9!"17 g
100.00
\
P.O.B. 8
~~
II
I
PROPOSED 20'
UilUTY EASEt.4EN T
587. Z'O".W
234,30'
. ~
~1O
lil....
~
~
15~
....'
,~
-w
~z
wW
jEF..,.
l5l5::::-
w~a
z~
:J~w
.... j!:
IIlW
!i1j!:~
PROPOSED
PRODUCTION
WELL NO. 16
UTIlITY EASEMENT
15~
~::::-
~w
~z
w....
jEF~
~~::::-
w,rtll:
z.::-1Il
:J~w
.... j!:
IIlW
~F~
P.O.C.
SW CORNER
SECTION 14
12 W 1/2 OF THE W 1/2 OF THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
PROPOSED FOLIO NO.:
TEMPORARY 8400001
CONSTRUCTION 0041
EASEMENT FOR
PRODUCTION
WELL NO. 16
~
,)
----
'- SOUTH UNE SECnON 14
KEY:
F,P.&L-FlORIDA POWER & UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
O.R. - OmCIAL RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
P.O.B.-POINT Of BEGINNING
P,O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
;~~~~~~;~ 186773)
PROFESSIONAL SIJRVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLOR1~""_UCENSE NO. LS ~76
lHlS li!... 'DAY Of ~ 2005.
SEE SHEET 2 Of 2
fOR DESCRIPTION
tiQ.1f:
lHE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STAlE PLANE
COORDINAlE SYSlEM, FlA. EAST ZONE. '8J(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND M,6.PPING
3900 COlONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAlI...: SURVE'1'1NGGCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. LLC DRAWN BY: .JfW CHECKED BY: J,N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1--60' REV: 3/11/05
TEMP. CONSlRUCllON EASEUENT IN lHE
NE 1/4 Of' THE SW 1/" OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC14T-AE(TC14 SHEET: 1 Of 2
EXHIBIT-A-
Page..1.:L of ~
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 46 of 236
PROJECT 70 'i '1 O?j
PARCEL 7/7 R
FOlIO _0 0'1 I 'il.( VOt/a I
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION. OF A
30' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF lliE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION OF 30-FOOT STRIP OF LAND L YlNG IN THE WEST 1/2 OF lliE WEST 1/2 OF THE
NORlliEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTI-lWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, TI-lENCE RUN NB7.38'03"E, A
DISTANCE OF 1,337,94 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN
NOO.49'.35"E, A DISTANCE OF 2650.79 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF TI-lE
SOUlliWEST 1/4; TI-lENCERUN N87"32'04"E. A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUlH
LINE OF A 30-FOOT ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
1099, PAGE 2277, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COlLIER COUNTY, flORIDA. SAID LINE RUNNING 30
FEET SOUTH OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARALLEL TO, THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE soumWEST 1/4 TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN N8T32'04"E. A DISTANCE OF 234.30 ALONG SAID soum
LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
TI-lE SOUlliWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO'49'18"W, A DISTANCE OF 30.05 FEET ALONG SAID
EAST LINE; THENCE RUN SB7"32'04"W, A DISTANCE OF 2.34.30; THENCE RUN NOO.49'35"E, A
DISTANCE OF 30.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 7,041 SQUARE FEET OR 0.16 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SEE SHEET 1 Of" 2
FOR SKETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
ClIENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN. LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DAlE: 8/3/04 SCALE: NA REV: 3/30/05
'ID.lP. CONSlRUCllON EASEMENT IN 'THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No;SEC14T-AE(TC14 SHEET: 2 Of' 2
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10. 2005
Page 47 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Page..!i1Lof ,t;;o
..
w '-
j!:~-
W..,.
lI..WZ'-
oj!:w-
~\5j!:~
::J I&.W
I-~Oj!:
IIl_N
~ ~:::-lS
P,O.B.
F,P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
P,O.C.
SW CORNER OF
se:CTION~4
N6T3B.03"E
1337.94'
PROJECT 7() r;q :ll
PARCEL q ( 7
FOLIO DoL{ , <(;'100001
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
20' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTlON 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORnI LINE or mE W 1/2 Of mE W 1/2
Of mE NE 1/4 OF mE SW 1/4
N6T32'04"E N67.32'04" 334.30'
EXIS11NG ROAD AND unllTY EASEMENT O.R. 1099/2277 ~
S67'32'04"W
b
-
334.30'
. ~
a.
,~
N O.
'- ..('4 ~
-w'- '
3';j!:- ~
w\5~
j!: w
~~j!:
!i3';l5
:Jw"
I-j!::::-
III
<I&.W
woz:
KEt. ~
F.P.&L.-F1..0RIDA POWER lie UGHT CO,
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O.R. - OFFlClAL RECORDS BOOK!pAGE
p.O.e.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
0.
r--
~
U>
N
W
.
It'l
,.,
~
b
o
z:
;,,~
~~
NO.
~
o <t
o '-
z:
~~
~~
....1&.
~o
I-~
1Il_
~w
----.J
W 1/2 OF THE W 1/2 OF THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00418400001
soum UNE SECTION 14
----
DESCRIPTION OF A 20-FOOT STRIP OF lAND LYlNG IN THE WEST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF nlE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
THE SOUnlWEST 1/4 Of SEC110N 14, TOWNSHIP 50 soum, RANGE 26 EAST. COlliER COUNTY. R.ORIOA:
"
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Of SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN NBT36'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,337.94
fEET ALONG nlE SOUnI UNE Of SAID SEC110N: l'HENCE RUN NOO'i9'3S"E, A DISTANCE Of 2650.79 FEET ALONG
mE WEST UNE Of l'HE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING: mENCE CONTINUE
NOO.49'3S"E, A DISTANCE OF 20.03 fEET ALONG l'HE WEST UNE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF l'HE WEST 1/2 OF l'HE
NORnlEAST 1/4 Of l'HE SOUmWEST 1/4; l'HENCE RUN N8T32'04"E, A DISTANCE Of 334.30 FEET ALONG A UNE
RUNNING 10 fEET SOlJllI Of (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARALlEL TO. llIE NORTH UNE OF SAID WEST
1/2 Of l'HE WEST 1/2 OF mE NORmEAST 1/4 Of THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; mENCE RUN SOO'49'18"W, A DISTANCE OF'
20,03 fEET ALONG l'HE EAST UNE Of SAID WEST 1/2 Of' THE WEST 1/2 OF 'THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF' THE
SOU'THWEST 1/4: llIENCE RUN S67"32'04"W, A DISTANCE OF 334.30 FEET ALONG l'HE SOUnl UNE OF' A 3D-FOOT
ROAD AND UTIUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1099, PAGE 2277, PUBUC RECORDS OF
COWER COUNTY. R.ORIDA, SAID UNE RUNNING 30 fEET SOUTH OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND
PARALLEL TO. SAID NORl'H LINE AND TO 'THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 6.686 SQUARE FEET OR 0.15 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
J~_
t!QJE;
l'HE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA lED ARE BASED ON ^ FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTlON 14. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDIN^TE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '63(90.
JAM . WlU<ISON (fOR THE FIRM LB6773)
PRO SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
R.ORIDA UCENSE NO, LS 4876
THIS _ D^Y OF ~ 2004,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOClA lES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, F1...ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EM AIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CLIENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
Pi\RCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 6/3/04 SCALE: '"..60' REV: '0/20/04-
20' UTlUTY EASEMENT IN mE
NE 1 4 Of nlE SW 1 4 Of SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No:SEC14T-AE(PI4) SHEET: 1 Of 1
EXHIBIT A
Page-#J.-Of I c;O
Agenda Item NO.1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 48 of 236
PROJECT 70 "6 q "2- I
PARCEl 7/ 'if R.
FOLIO 00 <f 1'i'lOOOp
P.O,C.
NW CORNER Of
W 1/2 Of Tl-IE
W 1/2 Of Tl-IE
NE 1/4 Of THE
SW 1/4
;t
.
F~ - - -
~ g P.O,B. N87"32'04"E
~ - 40.00' 60.00'
N8l" 32'04"E"
:Rg
~d
<<00
o
Z
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 16
IN THE NE 1/4 Of THE SW 1/4 Of SECTION 14, T'M> 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
r-NORTH UNE OF THE W 1/2 OF THE W 1/2
I OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
EXISllNG30' ROAD AND UllUTY ^
~ ~SEMENT O.R. 1099/2277 ~
C PROPOSED 20'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
F.P,&L R/W '8
EASEMENT g
w
~z
-w
;ti=....
w.. '-
~o-
lI..~~
o_w
~;t~
:Jw...
li;j!:o
~15~
;t
~o
. 0
<II .
~~
C/)
W 1/2 OF THE W 1/2 OF THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00418400001
w
~b
o,<>!
""0)
8::
z
PROPOSED
PRODUCTION
WELL NO. 16
UTILITY EASEMENT
m:
F.P.&L-FlORIOA PO\'IER 8( UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O.R. - OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
P,O.B,-POlNT OF BEGINNING
P,O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
OESCRIPT1~ Of PARCEL OF" LAND L'l1NG IN Tl-IE \'lEST 1/2 OF" THE \'lEST '/2 OF" THE NORTl-IEAST 1/4 Of Tl-IE
SOUTl-l\'tJ:ST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTl-l, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA:
COMMENCING AT Tl-IE NORTl-IWEST CORNER Of SAID WEST 1/2 Of THE- WEST 1/2 OF Tl-IE NORmEAST 1/4 Of THE
SOUTl-IWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN SOO.49'3S"W, A DISTANCE Of 30,05 F'EET AlONG THE WEST UNE Of SAID \'lEST 1/2
Of mE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORmEAST 1/4 OF Tl-IE SOUTHWEST 1/4 FEET TO THE SOUlH UNE OF A 30-F"ooT ROAD
AND UTlUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1099, PAGE 2277, PUBUC RECORDS OF COWER
COUNTY, FlORIDA, THENCE RUN N87"32'04"E, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 F'EET ALONG SAID soum EASEMENT UNE TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NB7'J2'04"E, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 tEET ALONG SAID SOUTH
EASEMENT UNE, THENCE RUN SOO.49'3S"W, A DISTANCE OF" 180.00 ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARAua TO SAID WEST
UNE; THENCE RUN S8l"32'04"W, A DISTANCE Of 100,00 TO SAID WEST UNE: THENCE RUN NOO.49'3S"E. A DISTANCE
OF' 119.90 FEET ALONG SAID WEST UNE; THENCE RUN N67"32'04~E, A DISTANCE OF 43.45 fEET: THENCE RUN
N02"27'56"E. A DISTANCE OF 60.00 F'EET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 15,467 SQUARE FEET OR 0.36 ACRES, MJRE OR U:SS.
~~~E - . -~~~;;-;;;-;;~ lB'm)
PR ONAl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlOR DA UCENSE N~76
lHIS t:1..!..'7JAY OF DOS. n-"s IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BL W., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE'rlNGOCOONER,COU
CUENT: GREElEY. AND HANSEN, LLC ORA'^'" BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N. W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: WElL NO. 16 DATE: 6/23/04 SCAlE: 1"-60' REV: 3/H/05
lEMP, CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN THE
NE 1 -4 Of THE SW 1 -4 Of SEe 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWO NO:SEC14W-TCE(TC18) SHEET: 1 OF 1
tmIf;
THE PARCR BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CAlCULA lED ARE BASED ON A FlEW SURVEY OF
SECTlON 14. BASIS Of BEARING: STAlE PLANE
COORDlNA lE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/'90.
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 49 of 236
EXHIBIT A
page~of /t)0
PROJECT
PARCEL
FOLIO
7o~C,-;'1
91<i? R
00 If ( <0 if oo()O I
P,Q,C.
NW CORNER Of'
W 1/2 OF mE
W 1/2 OF THE
NE 1/4 OF TH~_______
SW 1/4' "-
IF
- -3 f!q- -
d ~
I'l 8
\ VI N87.32'04"E
.-
P.O.B. 40.00'
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 16
IN lHE NE 1/4 OF lHE SW 1/4 OF SEC110N 14, lWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA
NORTH UNE OF tHE W 1/2 OF THE W 1/2
~ OF mE NE 1/4 OF' tHE SW 1/4 .
, N81.32.04"E _
- - - - t EX1sTING30~^o;;ND UllUTY
PROPOSED 20' EA.SEMENT Q.R. 1099/2277 ~
UTILITY
EA.SEMEHT _
---------------
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
~~
~w
:l:j!:.... fl
ltJl5' lll'b
i!: ; ~ d
15~1Il 8 <D
w;~ Z
z
:JW15
~~~
L/
~
:88
~d
NID
11\
FOUO NO.:
00418400001
L,
~~
1.
W 1/2 OF lHE W 1/2 OF THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
SB7.32'04"W
43.ItS'
Kt)::
F.P.&L-FLORIOA POWER & UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O.R. - OFFlOAL RECORDS BooK/PA.GE
P,O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
OESCRIPTION OF pA.ReEL OF LAND L'YlNG IN THE 'MOST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF mE NORlliEAST 1/4 OF lliE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTlON 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENONG AT mE NORTH'MOST CORNER OF SAID 'MOST 1/2 Of' tHE 'MOST 1/2 OF mE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
SOUlli'MOST 1/4. lliENCE RUN SOO'49'3S"W, A DISTANCE OF 30.05 FEET ALONG mE WEST UNE OF SAID WEST 1/2
OF THE 'MOST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO lliE SOUlli UNE OF A JO-FOOT ROAD AND
UTIUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1099, PAGE 2277, PUBUC RECORDS OF COUJER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; lliENCE RUN N81.32'04"E, A DISTANCE OF 40,00 FEET ALONG SAID
soum EASEMENT UNE, SAID UNE RUNNING 30 FEET soum OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARALLEL
TO, THE NORTH UNE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE 'MOST 1/2 OF lliE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF' THE SOUlHWEST 1/4;
THENCE RUN S02"27'56"E, A DISTANCE OF 60.00: lHENCE RUN SBT32'04"W, A DISTANCE Of 43.1tS rEET AlONG A
UNE THAT IS PARALlEL TO SAID NORTH UNE; lliENCE RUN Noo.49'35'E, A DISTANCE OF 60.10 FEET ALONG SAID
WEST UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 2.504 SQUARE FEET OR 0.06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
__~_ __-:L~
JAM N. W1U<ISON (FOR THE ARM LB6173)
PR SSIONAL SURVf;YOR AND MAPPER
FL IQAJ.lCENSE NO. l,.S 4876
THIS p-'1'f)AY OF ~005. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: 5URVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, ll.C DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRlPnON: WEU. NO. 16 DATE: 8/23/04 SCAlE: 1"-60' REV: 3/11/05
PRODUCllON WEll. UllUTY EASEMENT IN THE
HE 1/4 Of THE SW 1/4 Of' SFC14-S0-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWO NO:SECI4W-Tct(PI8 SHEET: 1 OF 1
. t:I.QIt:
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CAlCUU. TED ARE BASED ON A F1ElO SURVEY OF
SECTlON 14, BASIS Of' BEARING: STAlE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
EXHIBIT~
Page-!:i..1. of ~
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 50 of 236
PROJECT 7c'6~~ I
PARCEL 7 I Cf
FOLIO 00 t.{ ( ? 3 t,. 000 2-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
30. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY. FLORIDA
PROPOSED 20'
UTlUTY EASEJ.fENT NORlli LINE OF lliE E 1/2 OF THE 4
/ W 1/2 OF mE NE 1 4 OF mE SW 1
EXISllNG ROAD AND UllllTY -r- _ _ _ _
- ~T---oJl, T0987f59 g
7" 'D4"E 3 4. 0'
NORlli UNE OF lliE
NE 1/4 OF niE SW 1/4 ~
N67"32'04"E
----I
N87"32.0~4.JO' .... ~.
. It)
CD 0
~g
--8
z
....
S87'32'04"W
N
, -+
~....,
w~~
Wl<.~
~o:
lL~;:!:
0_
~~~
::]W.::!:.
liiiE~
~l5~
.-J
334.30'
in'
o~
dP
~ -+~ t
-w,
wiE~
1&I~~
;:!: W
lL~;:!:
0_
~~~
::Jw-+
1-:':'
~F'_
w~~
L
F.P.&l. R/W
EASEMENT ~ )
N w-+
iE)-
~~
WILl
~j:!:
lii~
~~
P.O.C.
SW CORNER
OF SECllON
14
w
.
It)
,..,
0,
:t-
o
o
%
E 1/2 OF THE W 1/2 OF THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00418360002
SOUni UNE SECTlON 14
W:
F.P.&L-FlORIDA POWER & UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
O.R. - omClAL RECORDS BOOK/pAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF' COMMENCEMENT
DESCRIPllON OF A 30-FooT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN niE EAST 1/2 or lliE WEST 1/2 OF niE NORlliEAST 1/4 OF
lliE soomWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlli, RANGE 26 EAST. COlUER COUNTY. FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT mE SOUniWEST CORNER OF SAID SECllON 14, lliENCE RUN N87'38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,337.94
FEET ALONG niE SOOlH UNE OF SAID SECTION; niENCE RUN NOO.49'JS"E, A DISTANCE OF 26S0.79 FEET AlONG
lliE WEST UNE OF lliE EAST 1/2 OF lHE SOUlHWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN N87"32'04"E. A DISTANCE OF 334,30 FEET
ALONG niE A UNE lHAT RUNS PARALlEL TO lHE NORni UNE OF ltIE NORlliEAST 1/4 OF mE SoolliWEST 1/4 TO
lHE POINT OF BEGINNING; lHENCE CONllNUE N87.J2'04"E, A DISTANCE OF J34.30 FEET ALONG lHE soom LINE OF
A 30-rOOT ROAD AND UllUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN omClAL RECORDS BOOK 1098, PAGE 1:59, PUBUC
RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA, UNE RUNNING 30 FEET soom OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND
PARAllEL TO, lHE NORTH UNE OF THE EAST 1/2 or THE WEST 1/2 OF" niE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF lHE SOUniWEST
1/4: mENCE RUN SOO'49'01"W, A DISTANCE OF 30.05 FEET ALONG niE EAST UNE OF SAID EAST 1/2 OF lHE WEST
1/2 or lHE NORmEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN S87'32.04"W, A DISTANCE or 334.30 FEET
AlONG A UNE lHAT IS PARALlEl TO SAID NORlH UNE: THENCE RUN NOO'49'18"E, A DISTANCE or 30.0S FEET
AlONG mE WEST UNE OF SAID EAST 1/2 OF' mE WEST 1/2 OF lHE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF niE SoolliWEST 1/4., AND
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 10,026 SQUARE FEET OR 0.23 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
~~- N. W1LK~~~ LB6773)
PR SSIONAL SUR\ltyOR ANO MAPPER
FlO IDA LICENSE NO. LS 4876
lHIS k1::!~AY OF~ 2004, THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
~EY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BL YD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX; (239)277-7179 EM AIL.: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: '.-80' 10/20/04
TatP. CONSlRUCnON EASEMENT IN lliE
NE 1/4 OF' mE SW 1/4 OF SEC 14.-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SECI4T-AE(1C1S SHEET: 1 OF 1
tmlf;
lHE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURIlEY OF'
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM. F1.A. EAST ZONE, '83/"90.
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 51 of 236
EXHIBIT A
page..!:i.!Lot 15'""0
PROJECT 70tg'j;2, I
PARCEl 9/ 9
FOLIO _Oc)4 ('0 3bOoO;;;1.,
NORm UNE OF THE
NE 1/4 Of niE SW 1/4
--1'187"32'04 "E
N87'32'04"E
-~
334.30 p.o.a,
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
20' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECllON 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
NORTH UNE OF THE E 1/2 OF THE W 1/2
OfTHENE140FTHESW1,4
N87"32' " 334.30
EXISTING ROAD AND UTIUl'f EASEMENT
S87"32 04 W
b
~
f.P.&L R/W
EASEMENT w
~
~
b
o
z
N.,.
~~
w~
w
jEw
l.'5F
wl.'5
z
:::J
lii
W
W
w"'lI.
j!:~~
II. '1:........
ow~.,.
w:J:w,,"
ZFZ~
::J....w~
t-oF
~S~~
N87".38'03"E
1337,94'
S~5
~l.'5~
jE~w
~~jE
w~~
~iEZ
lii~:
~ Z
~ SOUTH UNE SECTION 14
E 1/2 OF THE W 1/2 OF THE NE
1/4 OF mE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00418360002
P.O.C.
SW CORNER
OF SECTION
14
Lro:: L
F,P."'L-FLORIDA PO\'\t:R '" UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
O,R, - OFFlClAL RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
P,O.B.-PotNT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
DESCRIPTION OF A 20-FOOT SlRlP Of' LAND LYING IN 'THE EAST 1/2 OF 'THE WEST 1/2 OF 'THE NOR'THEAST 1/4 OF
'THE SOU'THWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOU'TH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNl'f, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT 'THE SOU'THWEST CORNER OF SAID SECllON 14, 'THENCE RUN N87"38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,337.94
FEET ALONG THE SOU'TH UNE OF SAID SECTION: 'THENCE RUN Noo'49'35"E, A DISTANCE Of 2650.79 FEET ALONG
THE WEST UNE Of 'THE EAST 1/2 OF 'THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; "THENCE RUN N87"32'04"E, A DISTANCE OF 334,30 FEET
ALONG A UNE 'THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE NOR"TH LINE OF "THE I:tOR'THEAST 1/4 OF "THE SOU'THWEST 1/4 TO "THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN Noo'49'18"E, A DISTANCE Of 20.03 FEET ALONG 'THE WEST UNE OF SAID EAST
1/2 Of THE \'\t:ST 1/2 Of THE NOR'THEAST 1/4 Of THE SOU"THWEST 1/4; "THENCE RUN N87"32'04"E, A DISTANCE or
334.30 FEET ALONG A UNE RUNNING 10 FEET SOO'TH OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARALLEl TO, THE
NORm UNE Of SAID EAST 1/2 OF 'THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORniEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; niENCE RUN
SOO.49'Ol"W, A DISTANCE OF 20.03 FEET ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID EAST 1/2 Of THE WEST 1/2 Of THE
NOR'THEAST 1/4 Of THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; 'THENCE RUN S87'32'04"W, A DISTANCE Of 334.30 FEET ALONG THE
SOUlli UNE OF '" 3Q-FOOT ROAD "'NO UllLlTY E"'SEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1098, PAGE
159, PUBUC RECORDS OF COUJER COUNl'f, FLORIDA, SAID UNE RUNNING 30 FEET SOU"TH Of (AS MEN5URED AT
RIGHT ANGlES), A.NO PARALLEL TO, SAID NOR'TH UNE AND TO 'THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 6.686 SQUARE FEET OR 0.15 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
-~/ ~~--
JAM N. W1U<ISON (FOR THE fIRM LB6773)
PR SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORIDA UCENSE NO. LS 4876
THIS ~AY OF Oc-.r 2004.
tIQ1t;
'THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY Of
SECllON 14. BASIS Of BEARING: STAn: PLANE
COORDINAn: SYSlD.(, FLA. EAST ZONE, '63(90.
11-IIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVE'Y1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS. nORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 F"'X: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE.Y1NGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN. U.C DRAWN BY: ,J>fW CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DAlE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1".60' REV: 10/20/04
20' UTIUTY EASEMENT IN THE NE 1/4
Of 'THE SW 1 4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC14T-AE(Pl5) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHISIT-L-
Page i{~ of 1'5'0
Agenda Item NO.1 DC
May 10,2005
Page 52 of 236
PROJECT _70 f5 7 :z. /
PARCEl_ 7 ;<'0
FOLIO ....E!.o<f I'i) 3 ~ ~oo
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
30' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
IN Tl-fE NE 1/4 OF TI-lE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTI1 LINE OF TI1E
NE '/4 Of' TI1E SW 1/4
~7'32'04"~ EXISllNGROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT O.R; g
N81'32'04"E 668.~ P.O.B. N 1'3 ' 4"E
._-~ w.
. If)
- 0
Po
S' ,.,
--8
z
F.P.deL. R/W _ ___
EASEMENT ~ ~
~ wl
;;'2::-
~~
L&lw
~i!:
liil5
~~
w
'" S8T32'04"W
'- ...
-w'-
"'i!:-
wl&.~
;;ol!!
~~~
w;:;~
Z
:JWT
liii!:'2::-
~b~
...J
334.30'
P.O.C.
SW CORNER
Of' SEcnON
14
w
.
It)
..,
~
8
z
W 1/2 OF THE E 1/2 OF THE
N87'38'03"E
1337.94'
- SOUTH LINE SECTION 14
DESCRIPTION OF A 3D-FOOT STRIP OF LAND L'l1NG IN TI1E M:ST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 Of'
mE soumWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECllON 14, THENCE RUN N87'38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,337.94
FEET /)lONG THE' SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN Noo'49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 2850.79 FEET ALONG
THE WEST LINE OF lHE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTI1WEST 1/4; TI1ENCE RUN N87'32'04"E, A DISTANCE OF 668.60 FEET
ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARAllEL TO THE NORTH UNE OF" THE NORTI1EAST 1/4 Of' TI1E SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE CONTlNUE N87'32'04"E, A DISTANCE OF 334,30 FEET ALONG THE SOUlH UNE OF ^
ROAD AND UTlUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN omClAL RECORDS BOOK 1359, PAGE 1429, PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COWER COUNTY, Fl.ORIDA, SAID LINE RUNNING 30 F"EET SOUlH OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND
PARAlLEL TO, THE NORTH UNE OF THE M:ST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORlHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUlHWEST
1/4: THENCE RUN SOO'48'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 30.05 FEET ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF lHE EAST
1/2 OF' THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: TI1ENCE RUN S81'32'04"W, A DISTANCE OF 334.30 FUT
ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALlEL TO SAlD NORTI1 UNE; lHENCE RUN NOO'49'0'"E, A DISTANCE Of' 30.05 FEET
ALONG TI-iE WEST UNE Of' SAID WEST 1/2 OF TI1E EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTI1EAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 10.028 SQUARE FEET OR 0.23 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
'~I
--- --_ _J~____
JA N, W1U<ISDN (FOR THE fiRM LB6773)
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORIDA LICENSE No"...i1--.4876
THIS ~nDA Y OF v 2004.
Will;
mE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FlEW SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COOROINA TE SYSTEM. FlA. EAST ZONE. '83/'90,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOClA lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
39DO COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, Fl.ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EM All: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
ClIENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LtC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1-..60'
"JEMP, CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN THE
HE 1 .. OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC14T-AE(TClll SHEET; 1 OF 1
REV: 10/20/04
EXHIBIT A
page~of 1t;;'1?
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 53 of 236
PROJECT 70~1.z I
PARCEL q til.. 0
FOLIO 00'1 1'133 ~oooO
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
20' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN lHE NE 1/4 OF lHE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
b r- NOR1l'I UNE or THE W 1/2 OF THE ..
r- NORTH UNE OF THE "I I E 1/2 OF 1l'IE NE 1/4 OF "THE SW 1,4-
I NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4- . ' ".,. .. ~u ..n'
N!H' .
_ e-- -, EXISTING ROAD AND UTIUTY EASEMENT ~ O.R. 1359/1429
I/'" NB7.;S2'04"E 66B,60'-'" p.o.a, ';.' 33...3 ) 'ft
---:7~' - ~ ~ ~ S87"32 04 W t? :t
6 8 ~ ~
~ d N ~
F,P.&L. R/W ~ N ;II: ~ w fil
EASEMENT ~ ~ z ;!l:~w w~~
~ ) wN~ ~-~
~ w... j!:~ \5:::...
w~ ~w~ ~,
~ 0 ~F_
~ ~ ~ ~ W 1/2 OF lliE E 1/2 OF lHE NE ::J \5 ~.::t.
~ ~ := IS ~ ~ ' /4 OF lHE SW , /4 Iii N Ul -
;z F ~. FOLIO NO,: i5~;; l:i
:=~ ~~~~ ~
~ 0 ;11:. FIn 00418320000
Y.lS ) W.
J' - F.P.deL.-FlORIDA POWER de UGHT co.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O.R. - OF'FlClAL RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING '
P.O,C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
t,
~~
L
P,O.C.
SW CORNER
or SECTION
lA.
N87"38'O;S.E ?
13~7.94-' \
lU
10
t')
~
8
z
I sourn LINE SECTION 14
DESCRIPTION OF A 20-FOOT STRIP Of LAND LYlNG IN mE WEST 1/2 OF "THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NOR"THEAST 1/4 OF
THE sournWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOYtffSHIP., 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, F1..ORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, nlENCE RUN NB7"3B'03"E. A DISTANCE OF 1,337.94
FEET ALONG THE sourn UNE OF SAID SECTION: rnENCE RUN NOO.49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 2650.79 FEET ALONG
THE WEST UNE OF nlE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; niENCE RUN N87.32'04"E, A DISTANCE OF 66B,60 FEET
ALONG A UNE nlAT RUNS PARALLEL TO nlE NORnl UNE OF THE NORrnEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE
POINT Of BEGINNING; niENCE RUN NOO'49'01"E. A DISTANCE OF 20.03 FEET ALONG niE WEST UNE OF SAID WEST
1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF lHE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF niE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN N87.32'04"E, A DISTANCE OF
334,30 FEET ALONG A UNE RUNNING 10 FEET SOUTH OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGlES), ANO PARAu.R TO, THE
NORni UNE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF niE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORrnEAST 1/4 Of THE SOUlllWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
SOO.48'4,4.W, A DISTANCE Of 20.03 FEET ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF niE EAST 1/2 OF THE
NORniEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUlllWEST 1/4-; THENCE RUN S87'J2'04"W, A DISTANCE OF 334.30 FEET ALONG nlE
SOUTH UNE OF A 3o-FOOT ROAD AND UTIUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFlCIAl RECORDS BOOI< 1359. PAGE
1429. PUBUC RECORDS OF COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA, SAID UNE RUNNING 30 FEET SOU1l'l OF (AS MEASURED AT
RIGHT ANGlES,) AND PARAU.El TO, SAID NORTH UNE AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 6,686 SQUARE FEET OR 0.15 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
J- ~-.u.;; lS6713)
~:i~ll SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
flORIDA UCENSE NO. lS 4876
THIS ~OAY Of ~ 2004. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOOATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD.. SUITE 4, fORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN. LlC DRAWN BY: JNW . CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: '.-60' lREV: 10/20/04
20' U11UTY EASEMENT IN nlE NE 1/4
OF lHE sw '/4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC14T-AE(P18) ISHEET: 1 OF 1
l::I.tm;
niE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BAsm ON A F1EI..O SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA EAST ZONE, '83/90,
EXHIBIT A
page3.1... of I 5'0
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10. 2005
Page 54 of 236
PROJECT 70'6 Cj :z I
PARCEl 7 ;z. I
FOLIO oOl.{ I C:. q(p CXXJ b
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
80' TEMPORARY CONSTR.UCTION EASEMENT
IN. THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14. TWP 50 5,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FlORIDA
NORTH LINE Of THE NE 1/.
OflHESW1.
N87'32'04"E - 1433/855 g
- -EXISTING ROADANO UTIUTY EASEMENT O:R., " 15400'
" 100290' P.O.B. N87 32 04 E .
N87'32'04 E --..t----- - ---' w .
. :g
~ .
. g
___'J
-- - 0
o
z
P.O.C.
SW CORNER
Of SECTION
14
!'l
l!J
'"
:t'
8
z
N
....... ..r
~W.......
wjE-
w...~
jEow
l3~iE
w:l5
z
::::Jw~
l/iiE';::-
WILW
~oz
;,,~
C?~
g ,N
~
S87"32 04 W 154.01 I ~
PROPOSED TEMPORARY ./
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT -A
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 17 L
E 1/2 OF THE E 1/2 OF THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO,:
00416960006
~:
F.P.&L-FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
O.R. - OFFlOAL RECORDS BOOK/pAGE
p.O.e.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
UTIUTY-UllUTY
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT ; ')
N ~.::!:.
SOUTH UNE SECTION 14
DESCRIPTIptj OF A 30-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 Of THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST. COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMlwtrnONG AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Of SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N87'38'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 1.J37.94
FU:T ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NOO'49'3S"E, A DISTANCE OF 2650.79 fEET ALONG
THE WEST UNE Of THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCI!' RUN N87"32'04"E, A DISTANCE Of 1002,90 fEET
ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE N87'32'04"E. A DISTANCE OF' 154.00 fEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF A
ROAD AND UTIUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN ornOAL RECORDS BOOK 14J3. PAGE 855, PUBUC RECOROS OF
COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID UNE: RUNNING 30 fEET SOU'TH OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND
PARAllEL TO, THE: NORTH UNE OF THE EAST 1/2 Of THE EAST 1/2 Of" mE NORTHEAST 1/4 Of THE SOUTHWEST
1/4; 'THENCE RUN Soo.48'27"W. A DISTANCE Of' 30.05 FEET; 'THENCE RUN S87"32'04"W, A DISTANCE OF 154,01 fEET
ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARAllEL TO SAID NORTH UNE; THENCE RUN NOO"48'44"E. A DISTANCE Of' 30.05 FEET
ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID EAST 1/2 OF mE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 Of' THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, TO
THE POINT Of BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 4,621 SQUARE fEET OR 0.11 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
;~--~;;;~ LB6773)
PRo~ic:lti~~ly~i~ND MAPPER
FLORIDA UCENSE N~.;-s- 4876
ll-iIS ~DAY OF -r-- 2004.
liQIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES. AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A flEW SURVEY OF
SEC110N 14. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
lHlS IS NOT A SURVEY
.EFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI AlES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4. fORT MYERS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 fAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN. llC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEl DESCRIP110N: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-60' REV: 10/20/04
TEMP. CONSTRUCl1ON EASEMENT IN THE
HE 1 4 Of" THE SW 1/4 OF SEe 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SECI4T-AE(TC17 SHEET: 1 OF' 1
EXHIB1T *
Page JLi.. of I ()
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 55 of 236
PROJECT
PARCEl
FOLIO
7o~C, ;)./
9:Z1
00 if I 0 '1 (, Oct::;) Ce.
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
20' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORll-I LINE OF ll-IE
HE 1/~ Of ll-IE SW 1/4 "9
NS1'3Z'04"E
N81'32'O~"E .f 1002.90'
- w
~ 8
~ ~
z
NS7.3S'03-E
1337.9~'
SOUll-I UNE SECllON 14
ID:
F.P.&tL-FlORIDA POWER " LIGHT Co.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
O.R. - OfFICIAL RECORDS BOOK/pAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
;r;
8 ~
~ c:i ~
'- ..,...... :
~w' ~
wj!:~
w~~
j!: w
~~j!:
w;:;~
:z:
:Jw..,.
liij!:~
~~~
~
F.P.&l. R/W
EASEMENT ~ ~
16 1
10 W..,.
N j!:~
w
to
,.,
a.
;ot
8
:z:
w
~ ....
~w'
wi!';
w15Ul
F w
lL~i!'
o~
!;gw15
:Jw....
...:1:'
UlF"~
~15~
,J
W 1/2 OF THE E 1/2 OF THE
NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00416960006
P.O.C,
SW CORNER
OF SEC110N
14
15~
Ww
~i!'
lii15
~~
DESCRIPTION Of A 20-FOOT STRIP Of LAND LYING IN ll-IE EAST I/Z Of ll-IE EAST 1/2 Of THE NORll-IEAST 1/4 Of
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECnON 14, TOWNSHIP. 50 SOUlH, RANGE 26 EAST, COlLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMt.lENClNG AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Of SAID SEC110N H, THENCE RUN N81'38'03"E, A DISTANCE Of 1,337.94
FEET AlONG ll-IE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SEcnON; THENCE RUN NOO'49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 2650.79 FEET ALONG
THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN N87"32'04-E, A DISTANCE OF 1002.90 FEET
ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE NORm UNE OF THE NORlHEAST 1/4 Of THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE RUN Noo'48' H"E, A DISTANCE Of 20.03 FEET ALONG lHE WEST LINE Of SAID EAST
1/2 OF mE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN N87'32'04-E, A DISTANCE OF
33~.30 FEET ALONG A UNE RUNNING 10 FEET SOUTH OF (AS MEASUREO AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARALLEL TO, THE
NORTH LINE OF' SAID EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF mE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE soumWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
SOO.48'27-W, A DISTANCE Of 20.03 FEET ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID EAST 1/2 OF SAID EAST 1/2 OF THE
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHY1C:ST 1/4; THENCE RUN S87'32'04"W, A DISTANCE Of 334.30 FEET ALONG THE
SOUTH UNE OF A 30-FOOT ROAD AND unLlTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OF1"lClAl RECORDS BOOK 1433, PAGE
855, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, flORIDA. SAID LINE RUNNING 30 frET SOUTH OF (AS MEASURED AT
RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARAU.EL TO, SAID NORTH LINE AND TO mE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 6,686 SQUARE frET OR 0.15 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
J;~~~~;~ LB6773)
P~~O~AL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
flORIDA LICENSE NO, LS 4876
THIS ~ OA Y OF' <1.Gd:::- 2004.
l:iOlE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA lES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. LlC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1--60' REV: 10/20/0~
20' UTILITY EASEMENT IN THE NE 1/4
OF' lHE SW 1 4 OF' SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SECI4T-AE(P17) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT~
P ag e...f::i.1.. of I
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 56 of 236
PROJECT 7o'Sct ~ I
PARCEl 7;(, ;).
FOLIO 00'1 / 6'1~006 b
L~
~~
L
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 17
IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
r-- NORTH UNE OF THE E 1/2 OF THE E 1/2
f OF 'mE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 _
" EXISTING-1Q' ROAD ANDUllUTY -f'
- - -~EASEMENT O.R. 14JJ7855 ---..... N
H87"J2'04"E" - ~ PROPOSED
- - - - - 130.22' ~ R ______PRODUCTION
. ".... ~ WELL NO 17
PROPOSED 20 N ~ __ ~ UTILITY EASEMENT
~~~~1JENT W ~ ~ P.O.B. / l:;
l:; .... ~ 50.08' ~
~ g N87"32'04"r ~
is b (IJ
Z
P.O.C.
HE CORNER OF
E 1/2 OF' THE
E 1/2 OF' lHE
NE 1/4 OF THE
SW 1/4
E 1/2 OF THE E 1/2 OF
THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00416960006
o
...
w13w
w~~
~-
l4.w13
Ow-.t
~ iE::::-
::Jl4.w-t
I-oz_
~NW~
w::::-~(IJ
180.30'
S87"32'04"W
m:
F.P.&L-FLORIDA PO~R & UGHT CO.
R/'N - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O.R. - OFFlClAL RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
P,O.B,-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C,-POIHT OF COMMENCEMENT
~
DESCRIPTION OF' A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE EAST 1/2 OF' lHE EAST 1/2 OF lHE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTH~ST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTH~ST 1/4, THENCE RUN SOO.48'27"W, A DISTANCE OF 70.12 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST 1/2
OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUm~ST 1/4 TO "THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE CONllNUE
SOO'4a:2rW, A DISTANCE OF 60.10 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE; mENCE RUN SS7'J2'04"W. A DISTANCE OF IS0.30
FEET ALONG A UNE mAT RUNS PARAUEL TO THE NOR"TH UNE OF SAID EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN NOO'48'27.6, A DISTANCE OF 100.17 FEET ALONG A UNE
TI-lAT RUNS PARAllEL TO SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN N87.32'04"E, A DISTANCE OF 130.22 FEET ALONG TI-lE
SOUTH UNE OF A 30-FOOT ROAD AND UllUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFfICIAL RECORDS BOOK 143J, PAGE
855, PUBLIC RECORDS Of COLUER COUNTY. FLORIDA. SAID LINE RUNNING 30 FEET soum OF (AS MEASURED AT
RIGHT ANGLES). AND PARALlEL TO, TI-lE NORTH UNE OF TI-lE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTI-lEAST 1/4
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; "THENCE RUN SOO'48'27"W. A DISTANCE .OF 40.07 ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARAllEL TO
SAID EAST UNE: THENCE RUN NS7.32'04-E, A DISTANCE OF 50.08 FEET ALONG A UNE lHAT RUNS PARALLn.. TO
SAID NORm UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 16,052 SQUARE FEET OR 0.37 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~~S~~THEF"" lB6773)
P SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORll1A Ll.CENSE NO. lS 4876
THIS' k2d!bA Y Of !2..s:l:; 2004.
tiQll;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECTlON 14. BAStS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINA TE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
"THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, Llc DRA~ BY: .J.lW CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: WELl NO. 17 DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1--60' I REV: 10/20/a4
TEMP. CONSlRUCTION EASEMENT IN THE
NE 1/4 Of 'tHE SW 1/4 OF SEe 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 we NO:SEC14IV-TCE(lCI7)ISHEET: 1 Of 1
EXHIB\T A
pag.~ of l t;' ()
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 57 of 236
PROJECT 70-692-1
PARCEL q;2. ~
FOLIO OOI..//{;,'f(potJofo
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 17
IN ll-lE NE 1/'" OF ll-lE SW 1/4 OF SECllON 14. TWP 50 S.
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
E 1/2 OF THE E 1/2 OF THE NE
1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00416960006
t ;...
<'l 0
~ ~
8
z
P.O.C.
NE CORNER Of
E 1/2. OF WE
E 1/2. OF lHE
NE 1/4 OF lHE
SW 1/4
NORTH UNE Of WE E 1/2. Of lHE E 1/2
I Of '!HE NE 1/4 OF lHE SW 1/4
"---msl1tiG...3lLRO/>JLANQ..J[IlurL - - -
-\ EASEMENT O.R. 1433/655 ~ P
PROPOSED 20' .0,8-
UTILITY N87.32'04"E
E.ASEMENT
50.08'
;...
o
~
\l..
wow
w~j!:
j!:-\l..
...1&10
o~.,.
~I!:~
:J~~~
I- -
~$*~
)
50.08'
SB7'32'04"W
W:
F.P.&L.-FLORIDA POWER & UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O.R. - OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK/PAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C,-POINT Of COt.AMENCEMENT
DESCRIPllON Of A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE EAST 1/2 Of THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NOR'!HEAST 1/4 OF '!HE
SOUlHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION H, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUW. RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT lHE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST 1/2 OF '!HE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORWEAST 1/4 OF lHE
SOUlHWEST 1/4, WENCE RUN SOO.48'27"W. A DISTANCE OF 30.05 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST 1/2
OF l1ii: EAST 1/2 OF mE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT 01' BEGINNING; lHEHCE CONllNUE
SOO.48'27"W, A DISTANCE .01' 40.07 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE; lHENCE RUN S87"32'04"W. A DISTANCE Of 50.08
FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE NORlH UNE OF >.SAID EAST 1/2 OF '!HE EAST 1/2 OF lHE
NORlHEAST 1/4 OF ll-IE SOUTHWEST 1/4; mENCE RUN NOO'48'27"E. A DISTANCE OF 40,07 FEET ALONG A LINE
lHAT RUNS PARALl.EL TO SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN NB7"32'04"E, A DISTANCE OF 50.08 FEET ALONG lHE SOUlH
UNE Of A 30-FOOT ROAD AND UTIUTY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFl1C1AL RECORDS BOOK 1433, PAGE 855,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID LINE RUNNING 30 FEET SoolH OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGlES), AND PAAAli.El TO, lHE NORlH LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF mE EAST 1/2 Of lHE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF lHE
SOUlHWEST 1/4, TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 2.007 SQUARE FEET OR 0,05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
---(,/ A:?:.
JAME N. WILKISON (FOR THE FlRM LB6173)
PRO SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FL IDA UCENSE NO. ~ 4876
lHlS ~DAY OF ~ 2004.
IiQ.J.t;
mE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM. f'LA, EAST ZONE. '8.3(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
~EY C. COONER AND ASSOClA lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUiTE.... FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)271-0722 fAX: (239)271-7179 EM AIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPnON: WELL NO. 17 DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1".60' REV: 10/20/04
PRODUCTION WELL UllL1TY EASEMENT IN lHE
NE 1 4 Of' lHE SW 1 4 OF' SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 we No:SEC14W-TCE(Pl SHEET: 1 OF 2
EXHIBIT fl
Page-..fLof (~o
Agenda Item No_ 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 58 of 236
PROJECT 7 o~ '1 2.1
PARCEL ~ ;;< 3
FOLIO 00 'II (, ~foocJO q
v
rc=-p ,Q.C.
NW CORNER OF NORm LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF
SECTION 14 ~ THE NW 1/4
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN lHE SW 1/4 OF lHE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH UNE SECTION 147
---... ---
v !
"'~
':0.
~;t-
:-28
II> N87'7R'57"r
\ 155.27
'-P_O_B,
N8T25' 49"E
1180.83'
~
LL :::-
o~~
~-Z
:J3:w
t-zj!:
(1)1&/
~jE~
in
... L,
:::-
3: 3:
~ In ~J
'" w
... j!:...
~ ~:::- j
w:l:
.~ ZZ
:JILl
, IiiF
~ ~~
~"-J
~soum UNE OF mE SW 1/4 OF
ll-lE NW 1/4
'"
..,
S ~ t ~'
:g >. ~
a. I- .
o ;! ~ ,. ~
'" I- ..: ..-
ll.::>w
w
L_ ~ F.P.&L. R/W
8 EASEMENT
z
i- - 170'
155.26'
S87'J204 W
SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00416560008
ID:
F.P.&L-FlORIDA POWER ole UGH CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF" COMMENCEMENT
DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTIlWEST 1/4 OF ll-lE NORll-lWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14.
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUll-l, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
, '
COMMENCING AT THE NORTI-lWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14. THENCE RUN N8T2S'49"E. A DISTANCE OF 1,180.83
FEET ALONG TI-lE NORlli LINE Of SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN SOO'49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 1340.32 FEET ALONG A
LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTI-lWEST 1/4 Of TI-lE NORTI-lWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; 1l-IENCE RUN NB7'2B'57"E. A DISTANCE Of 155.27 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST
1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO'49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 1340.46 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
SAID SOUlllWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SB7'32'04"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.26 FEET ALONG THE
SOUTH UNE OF SAID SOUll-lWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; ll-lENCE RUN NOO'49'3S"E, A DISTANCE OF 1340,32
FEET ALONG A LINE "THAT IS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE TO llIE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 207.763 SQUARE FEET OR 4.77 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
m,~A-;u.::k"(,Rn.,-';~ L8"'3)
PRo~~kRVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORIDA UCEN~!;!S>, _ ~ 4876
THI~,r.1 DAY ~2004. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
~"I(EY C. COONER AND ASSOCI AlES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900- COLONIAL BL YD., SUITE 4. FORT MYERS, Fl.ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J,N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPTlON: DATE: 8/17/04 SCALE: 1"-100. I REV: 10/20/04
AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4
OF' THE NW Ii. OF" SEe 14 50 28 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC14T-AE(AE4)ISHEET: , Of I
t:IQIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA lLD ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS Of BEARING: STAlL PLANE
COORDINA lE SYSTEM, FtA. EAST ZONE. '83/90.
EXHIBIT P.
page~of I~O
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 1 D. 2005
Pa~e 59 of 236
PROJECT 70 '87 ;:l. I
PARCEL q <<.3
FOLIO 00 'I/~ ~~ c;x:x; '6
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN n-JE SW 1/4 Of THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T\W 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLlIER COUNTY, flORIDA
NORlH LINE SECTION 147 _ _
P.O.B.
- -N6775' 49"E
1165.60'
P.O.C.
NW CORNER OF NORlH LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF
SECTION 14 c:::- lHE NW 1/4
H87'28'5,E
15.03'
"'"
'-
SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00416560008
~..,.....
0'-'-
~;;
::Izz
f-WW
~j!:j!:
.... ~
;r:
10 ~
n
'S! W
, j!:..,.
~ ~~
wiI:
zZ
::I....
...j!:
~~
"-J
lSEY:
F.P.c!tL.-FlORIDA POWER c!t UGH CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
170'
115.02'
S8TJ2'04"W
SOUTH LINE OF lHE SW 1/4 OF
THE NW 1/4
DESCRIPTION OF A 15-FOOT STRIP OF LAND L )1NG IN lHE SOUlHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORlHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14,
TOWNSJ"iIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COt.tMENCING AT lHE NORlliWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, tHENCE RUN N67'25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,165.60
FEET ALONG lHE NORtH LINE OF SAID SECTlON; lHENCE RUN SOO'(9'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 1340.31 FEET ALONG A
LINE lHAT RUNS PARAllEL TO THE EAST LINE OF lHE NORlHWEST 1/4 OF lHE NORlHWEST 1/4 TO lHE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE RUN N81'26'57"E, A DISTANCE OF 15.03 FEET ALONG tHE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4
OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO.49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 1340.32 FEET AlONG A LINE THAT RUNS
PARALLEL TO 1l-lE EAST UNE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE NORlliWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN S67.32'04"W, A
DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET ALONG lliE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lHE NORlHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
Noo'49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 1340.31 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE OF A 170-FOOT flORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID LINE RUNNING PARAllEL TO SAla EAST UNE TO 11-tE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 20,105 SQUARE FEET OR 0.46 ACRES, MORE OR lESS.
____.Jt~____=__
MQIE;
lHE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '63/,90.
. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB6773)
PR SIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
flORIDA UCENSE NO", ~ 4876
THIS~ DAY OF ~2004.
nus IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BlW., SUllE 4, FORT MYERS, F1.0RIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAIL.: SURVEYlNGGCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRA~ BY: .,tolW CHECKED BY; J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPl1ON: DAlE: B/17/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 10/20/04
15' UTlLlTY EASEMENT IN 1l-lE SW 1/4
Of" THE NW 1 4 Of" SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWO No:SECI4T-AE(P4 SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT II
P.g.~ of I ~O
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 60 of 236
PROJECT 70(; 'i ;Z /
PARCEl 7.;z ?l
FOLIO 00 l./ ,<g Lf 0030:2..
. ~
~~I
go,
....'f'
8
Ul
S8T28'57WW
~ '
.
10
r<>0)
. 0
0) ,
;01"0
811)
60,10' en
L S87"2B'57wW P.O.B.
soum UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE NW 1/4 OF lliE NW 1/4
DESCRIPTION Of A PARCEL Of LAND LYING IN TliE SOUTH '/2 Of THE SOUTH '/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 Of SECllON H. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
/
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 14
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
m:
f,P.&L-FLORJOA POWER & LIGHT CO,
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O. C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
S '/2 OF THE S '/2 OF
THE NW '/4 OF THE NW '/4
N87"2B'5rE
100.17'
PROPOSED 15'
;:- UnllTY
II EASEMENT
FOUO NO.:
00418400302
170'
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
w
.
~ ;;)
~ g
o
o
z
P.O,C.
SE CORNER Of
S 1/2 OF' lHE
S 1/2 OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE
NW 1/4
PROPOSED
PRODUCTION
WELL NO. 14
UnLlTY
EASEMENT
210.46'
SB7"2B'57"W
~......
",':::-
::::-~
IIlZ
wW
jEiE",
,.1.&.'
-o~
o ~
w~z
z_
::J W
t-1Ilj;
IIlW
~j;~
"J
~
.
It)
!')
Ol
<t-
O
o
Ul
COMMENCING AT lHE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of SAID SOUTH 1/2 Of THE SOUlH 1/2 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF lHE
NORTHWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN S8T28'57"W, A DISTANCE Of 210.48 ITEr ALONG THE SOUlli LINE OF SAID SOUlH
1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORlHWEST 1/4 or THE NORlHWEST 1/4 TO lHE POINT Of BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUE S87"28'57'W, A DISTANCE OF 60.10 FEET ALONG SAID LINE; lHENCE RUN NOO.49'J5"E, A DISTANCE Of
160.31 fEET ALONG A LINE lHAT RUNS PARALLEL TO T1iE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUlH 1/2 OF THE SOUT1i 1/2 or
THE NORTH'M:ST 1/4 Of THE NORT1iWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN N6T28'S7"E. A DISTANCE Of 100.17 FEn ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID SOUT1i LINE; lHENCE RUN SOO.49'JS'W, A DISTANCE Of IJO.22 fEET ALONG
lHE WEST LINE Of A 170-FOOT FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT, SAID LINE
RUNNING PARALlEL TO SAID EAST LINE; T1iENCE RUN S87"2B'S7"W, A DISTANCE Of 40.07 FEET ALONG A LINE lHAT
RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID SOUTH LINE; THENCE RUN SOO'49'JS"W, A DISTANCE OF 50.09 FEET ALONG A LINE T1iAT
RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 16,027 SQUARE FEET OR 0.J7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
-_.Lh~_____..._
t:IQIf;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELO SURVEY OF
SECnON 14. BASIS or BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE. '83/'90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA lES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS. flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (2.J9)2n-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAlL: SURVE'r1NGCCOONER.COM
CLIENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ~W CHECKED BY; J.N,W.
PARCEl DESCRIPllON: WELL NO. 14 DATE: 8/12/04 SCAlE:: 1"-60' REV: 10/20/04
TEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN THE
NW 1 4 OF' THE SW 1 .. OF SEC 14 50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SECI4W-TCE(TCl4 SHEET: lor,
Agenda Item NO.1 DC
May 10. 2005
Page 61 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Page..f!Lof I ~t/
PROJECT 70 "ltf :)./
PARCEl 9 ~ S'
FOLIO 00,/1 <;J'40o '30.:t
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 14
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FlORIDA
S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
"THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOUO NO,:
00418400302
~ J
w z
Vl w
~~~
O..JVl
0<1='...:
o.::>w
N8T2B'27"E
40.07'
w
.
Il)
I"lOJ
- 0
~d
Oil)
o
Z
~
.
_ Il)
OJ I"l
o -
d ~
Il) 0
o
lJ)
P.O.C.
SE CORNER OF
S 1/2 OF THE
S 1/2 OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE
NW1/... \
170.39'
40.07'
SBT2B'57"W .O.B.
SOUTH UHE OF' THE S 1/2 Of THE S 1/2
THE NW 1/'" OF lliE NW 1/'"
SBT2B'57"W
W:
F.P.&:L-FlORIDA POYiER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P,O.8,-POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C,-POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
~..,.
N"
,,~
~lI:
VlZ
ww
jEjE...
~l's~
..,NlI:
Z"Z
::J-w
....lIljE
'!.lwt..,
wiEo
DESCRIPTION Of A PARCEL OF lAND LYING IN lliE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of THE
NORTHYiEST 1/'" OF SECllON 1.... TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH. RANCE 26 EAST. COLUER COUNTY. flORIDA:
COMME,NClNC AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/.... 'THENCE RUN SB7"28'S7.W. A DISTANCE OF 170,39 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SOUTH
1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHYiEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONllNUE S87"28'S7"W. A DISTANCE OF 40,07 FEET ALONG SAID UNE; THENCE RUN NOO.49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF
50.09 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARAIl.El TO 'THE EAST UNE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF
THE NORlliWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/"'; lHENCE RUN N87'28'57"E, A DISTANCE OF 40.07 FEET ALONG A UNE
lHAT RUNS PARAU.EL TO SAID SOUlH UNE; THENCE RUN SOO'49'3S"W. A DISTANCE OF 50.09 FEET ALONG THE
YiEST UNE OF A nO-FOOT FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT. SAID UNE RUNNING
PARAIl.El TO SAID EAST UNE TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2.003 SQUARE FEET OR 0.05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
t!QJI;
lHE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA lED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINA'IE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
~EY C. COONER AND ASSOOA TE . INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD,. SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277~0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
WENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN. LlC DRAWN BY: .tIW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPl1ON: WEll NO. 14 DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-30' REV: 10/20/0'"
PRODUCTION WEll. UllUTY EASEMENT IN THE
NW 1 4 OF' 'THE NW 1 ... OF SEC 14-S0-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC14W-TCE(P'''' SHEET: 1 OF I
_ ___J~
'MLKlSON (FOR THE FlRM LB6773)
PRO ONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORI UCENSE NQ.. LS 4876
lHlS 'ZZ:dDOAY OF ~ 2004.
EXHIBIT-Av-
page..K of J ~
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 1 D, 2005
Page 62 of 236
PROJECT 70-69:</
PARCEl ff Ol 9
FOlIO OOI..{{"6'-/OtJ 30:<..
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECllON 14, T'Ml 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORlH UNE SECTION 14
"""""
N67"2S' 49"V'
1160.63'
N87"28'10"E
155.27
P,O.B.
---
~P.O.C.
NW CORNER OF THE S 1/2 OF'
SECTION 14 NORTH UNE Of THE S 1/2 OF'
lHE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
ISQ:
F.P,&L-F1..0RIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P,O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF' COMMENCEMENT
in
S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00418400302
a t-
~r.:~ r '
l5:Jl;: - 170
g: S j B F.P,&L. R/W
~.o EASEMENT ~ ~....
::J r.~N:::-
'"': 0. ::>~
~ ~ cnZ
~ WW
~ j!:j!:...
~ taJtaJ::>
:t' w~;r,z
o z~
~ ::J W
t-V1j!:
~~~
'-.....J
155.27'
587"2B'57'"W
SOUTH UNE OF "THE S 1/2 Of' THE S 1/2 Of'
THE NW 1/4 OF "THE NW 1/4
DESCRIPTlON OF A PARCEL Of LAND LYING IN lHE SOUTH 1/2 OF' THE SOUTH 1/2 OF lHE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF lHE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N67'2S'49"E. A DISTANCE OF 1,160.63
FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN SOO'49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF' 1005.24 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARAU.EL TO THE EAST UNE OF' THE NORlHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT Of
BEGINNING; THENCE RUN N67'26'10"E, A DISTANCE Of 155.27 FEET, ALONG THE NORTH LINE Of SAID SOUTH 1/2 Of
mE SOUTH 1/2 OF mE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF lHE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO'49'35wW, A DISTANCE OF
335.12 FEET AlONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF mE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN S87'28'57"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.27 FEET AlONG THE SOUlH UNE Of SAID SOUTH
1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4: lHENCE RUN NOO.49'35"E, A DISTANCE
OF 335,08 FEET ALONG A UNE RUNNING PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 51,941 SQUARE FEET OR 1.19 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
J:.>Esll~(~-;;~" ~77J)
PROFE~i~:'RVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORID~CENSE NO. L$ 4876
THIS '2 AY OF ~ 2004,
liQ1E;
THE PARCEl.. BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULAltD ARE BASED ON A RElD SURVEY Of'
SECTION 14, BASIS Of' BEARING: STAlE PLANE
COORDINA lE SYSlEM, A.A. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
~EY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, u.C DRAWN BY: ~W CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: B/12/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 10/20/04
AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE NW 1/4
Of' lHE NW 1 4 OF SEe 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: SECI4T-AE(AEJ SHEET: 1 OF 1
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 63 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Page"'&of ,,,0
PROJECT 7o-t9 :<.1
PARCEl cr;J, '1
FOLIO 00<11 ~'fOCJsO~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC1l0N 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORlti LINE SECTION 147 -....
N81'25'49"E I 1165.80' - - - ~
.
~l:1 ;>
~.o
~~
-~---
~P.o.C.
NW CORNER OF S 1/2 OF
SECTION 14 NORTH LINE Of 1l-lE S 1/2 Of mE
mE NW 1/4 Of THE NW 1/4 ~
P. O. B. ---.--/"
'---15.0.1'
N87"28'10"E
m:
f,P.&L-F1.ORIDA POWER de LIGHT co.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P,O.B.-POlNT Of' BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
15'- -
--170'
, ~
~ 7n F.P.&L. R/W
~ !" EASEMENT
~
b
51
"
I~
S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00418400302
IIJ
7n
I"l
0. iD
,. 0
8 ~
Z I"l
t. SOU1l-l UNE Of THE S 1/2 or mE S 1/2 or
r THE NW 1/4 Of mE NW 1/4
15.03' ~
SBT28's7"W "
~
15~-
IIJ'~
z-z
::I~lLI
....ziE
VIlLI
LJ~h
~...
~
70
n
a.
~
8
VI
~~
N'
,-
-~
VlZ
IIJIIJ
iEi!'.
.....~:::-
o ~
lIJ~z
z_
:J IIJ
I-Vlj!:
11141
~;;15
DESCRIPTION OF A 15-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN mE SOUTH 1/2 Of THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4
OF THIi- NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT 1l-lE NORlllWEST CORNER Of SAID SECllON 14, THEt-lCE RUN NB7'25'49"E, A DISTANCE Of 1,165.80
FEET ALONG mE NORlti LINE OF SAIO SEC1l0N; THENCE RUN SOO.49'JS"W, A DISTANCE OF 1,005.23 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO ltiE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO lllE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE RUN N81'28'10"E, A OISTANCE OF 15.03 FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID soum 1/2 OF
THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO.49'3S"W. A DISTANCE OF
335.08 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO mE EAST UNE Of SAID SOUTH 1/2 Of' THE soom 1/2 OF'
lHE NoRlHWEST 1/4 or mE NORlHWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN S8T2B'S7"W, A DISTANCE OF 15,03 FEET ALONG THE
SOUTH UNE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 or lHE soum 1/2 Of THE NORmWEST 1/4 Of mE NORTHWEST 1/4; lHENCE
RUN NOO.49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 335.08 FEET ALONG mE WEST UNE OF A 170-FOOT FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT
COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARALLEl TO SAID EAST UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 5,026 SQUARE FEET OR 0.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~,) Jpt
~;ME~- ,-;~~~-(;;-rnE;~M LB6773)
PROF SlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
F1.0R~'y~SE HE, L$ 4876
lHlS A Y Of' :::.l:::t 2004,
r:ro.re
lHE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA lED ARE BASED ON A FlElD SURVEY OF
SECllON 14. BASlS OF BEARING: STAlE PLANE
COOROINAlE SYSlEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/"90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
~EY C. COONER AND ASSOOATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DR"~ BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPll0N: DATE: B/12/04 SCALE: 1"-100' I REV: 10/20/04
15' UllUTY EASELlENT IN mE NW 1/4
Of' lHE NW 1/4 OF SEe 14-50-25 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG NO:SEC14T-AE(P3jSHEET: 1 or 1
EXHIBIT A
Page....2.1.of I ~o
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10. 2005
Page 64 of 236
PROJECT 7057 =2 I
PARCEl d --
---..:!2.-.;r~
FOlIO-POLflb"'1~o 7
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH LINE SECTION 14
-.....
N87'2S' 49.~
llBO.B3'
---
~P.O.C.
NW CORNER Of / THE S 1/2 OF
SECTION 14 NORTH UNE OF THE N 1 2 Of
THE NW 1/4 OF lllE NW 1/4
;l=
.:0
lOP')
-:0,
o~
:;;0
lil N87'27'23"E
155.27
P.O.B.
N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00416640009
'"
L-170, .
I 8 F.P.&:L. R/W
~ EASEMENT
I P') N
ori
..,
..,
w
:0
I')
'"
;f"
8
z
155.27'
S87'2B'10"W
~ ~....
~ N......
. ......~
~ -~
8 z Z
VI Will
~~....
~:s~
wN:J::
z......z
:J-w
f-Vl~
!;2WIL
wFO
"J
~:
F.P.&L-FlORlDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-or-WAY It
p.o.a.-POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C,-POINT Of COMl.lENCEMENT
SOUTH LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 Of
lllE NW 1/4 Of THE NW 1/4
a '"-
LJ z
~>-~
Q. ~ tv
O..J(/)
<>:FO<(
a. ::>w
DESCRIP'TlON OF A PARCEL OF LAND L'r1NG IN THE NORlll 1/2 or THE SOUTH 1/2 OF lllE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of THE
NORlllWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST. COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORlllWEST CORNER OF SAlD SECTION 14, THENCE RUN NBT25'49"E, A DISTANCE Of 1,180.83
FEET ALONG THE NORm LINE OF SAID SECTION; mENCE RUN SOO'49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 670.16 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF lllE NORlllWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT or
BEGINNING: THENCE RUN NB7'27'23"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.27 FEET ALONG lllE NORlll LINE or SAID NORlH 1/2 Of
THE SOUlH 1/2 OF lllE NOR1HWEST 1/4 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO.49'35"W, A DISTANCE Of
335,12 FEET ALONG THE EAST UNE Of SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE soum 1/2 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 or THE
NORTHWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN SBT28'10"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.27 FEET ALONG lllE SOUTH LINE Of SAID NORTH
1/2 OF THE SOUlH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN NOO'49'3S"E, A DISTANCE
Of 335.08 FEET AlONG A UNE RUNNING PARALlEL TO SAID EAST UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 51,941 SQUARE FEET OR 1.19 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
wm:
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, F1.A. EAST ZONE, '83(90,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 fAX: (239)277-7179 EM AIL: SURVEYlNGClCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, llC DRAWN BY: ~W CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/12/04 SCALE; 1"-100'
AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE NW 1/4
Of THE NW 1 4 Of SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: SEC'4h~E(AE2) SHEET: 1 Of I
---~ ~~--
JAMES ,WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM L.B6773)
PRO SIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlO~A,UCENSE N9. ~ 4876
THls"L~2DAY Ofus.+=-. 2004.
REV: 10/20/04
EXHIBIT Ii
Page 5''6 of J r;-O
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 65 of 236
PROJECT 7()~C; ~ I
PARCEL 930
FOLIO 00,/ (" t. '!(YJ(d ?
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COlliER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH LINE SECnON 14 7
N67'25' 49"E ./ 1165.60' - - -
P.O.C.
NW CORNER OF" ... THE S 1/2 OF"
SECTION 14 NORTH UNE OF" THE N 1/2 Or
11-lE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
EAST LINE Of
lllE NW 1/4
OF" THE NW 1/4
P.O.B.
15.003'
N87'27'2J"E
IS'
N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE NW 1/4 OF mE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00416640009
-170'
~ F.P,&L. R/W
.!"l EASEMENT
en
='"
~
~
.0
,.,
,.,
KEY:
F.P.c!cl.-FlORIDA POWER c!c LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P,O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
w
.
~
~
8
z
8
.0
:1
soum LINE OF niE N 1/2 OF" THE S 1/2 OF"
THE NW 1/4 OF" THE NW 1/4
15.003'
S87'28'10"W
;t:
.
II')
,.,
~
~
...
0....
,
~~
~;t:
ZZ
wW
i!:i!:....
~~::::-
w",;t:
Z'Z
::J~w
t-1Ilj;
~~~
"J
DESCRIPTION Of A 15-FOOT STRIP OF" LAND LYING IN THE NORTH 1/2 Of THE SOUTH 1/2 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4
OF" THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA:
~
COMMENCING AT THE NORlllWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, lllENCE RUN N87'2S'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,165.80
FEET ALONG THE NORlll LINE OF SAID SECTION; mENCE RUN SOO'49'3S"W, A DISTANCE Of 670.15 FEET ALONG A
LINE niAT RUNS PARAU.EL TO THE EAST LINE Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF lllE NORlllWEST 1/4 TO lllE POINT Of
BEGINNING; THENCE RUN N87'27'23"E, A DISTANCE OF" 15.003 FEET ALONG l1-IE NORTH UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 Of
THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF mE NORTHWEST 1/4: lHENCE RUN SOO'49.3S"W, A DISTANCE OF
335.08 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 Of lllE SOUlll 1/2 OF
THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORlHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN S87'28'10"W, A DISTANCE OF 15.03 FEET ALONG lllE
SOUTH UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF l1-IE NORlHWEST 1/4 OF lHE NORTHWEST 1/4: THENCE
RUN NOO.49'J5"E, A DISTANCE OF 335.08 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE OF A 170-FOOT FlORIDA POWER AND UGHT
COUPANY RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEUENT. SAID UNE RUNNING PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 5,026 SQUARE FEET OR 0.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
:;;.-;:;~d~n;;--;,~~ LB.773)
PROFEZ~i~~RVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORjpA LJCENSE Ng., L~ ~76
THIS'~AY OF~ 2004.
MQIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECllON 14. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. u.c DRAWN BY: JNW CHECl<ED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DATE: 8/12/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 10/20/04
15' U11UTY EASEMENT IN lHE NW X
OF THE NW 1 4 OF SEe 14-50 26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC14T-AE P2 SHEET: 1 OF 1
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 66 of 236
EXHIBIT t1
Page-ft,Of / e;-o
PROJECT
PARCEl
FOLIO
7o<gc, ;1./
~31
0()'It'6 "iftX>DI
-I?---
~P.o.c.
NW CORNER OF
SECTION 14
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH UNE SECTION 14 7 ' "
N87.25'49"E 1160.83' ~ N87"2549 E
'"I - - - 155,27'
'L P.O.B.
NE CORNER OF
\ THE NW 1/4 OF
\ THE NW 1/4
N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF
THE NW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00416680001
'iD
ci
"
l <D F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
-170'
j,
~~
C SOUTH UNE Of THE N 1/2 Of THE NW 1/4
Of THE NW 1/4
155,27'
S87"27'23"W
'"
'to
I'l
0.
.
. IL.
~ ~~~
d ....'
:;;.. ;!:;
~~-t-
w;!:~
Z
:Jlo.'"
1-0%
inN....
i::5~;!:
"'J
J.
.,.,
h
-t-
b
o
. Z
KEY:
F.P.&L-FLORIDA POWER & UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O,B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
o ,_
toJ Z
~;: ~
g;::.w
o:,:=Vl
0. ::J.::i
DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEl OF LAND LYING IN THE NORm 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
SECTION 14, TOMlSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COlLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: .
COt.lMEf"CING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N87'25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,180.83
FEET ALONG lHE NORTH UNE OF SAID SECTION TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE N87"25'49"E ALONG
SAID NORm UNf. A DISTANCE OF 155.27 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST 'CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORlllWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN SOO.49'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 670.23 FEET ALONG THE EAST UNE Of' SAID NORTH
1/2 Of lllE NORlllWEST 1/4 OF lllE NORlllWEST 1/4; lllENCE RUN S87'27'23"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.27 fEET
ALONG lllE SOUTH UNE Of SAID NORlll 1/2 OF lllE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF lllE NORTHWEST 1/4; lHENCE RUN
NOO'49'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 670.16 FEET ALONG A UNE RUNNING PARAllEL TO SAID EAST UNE TO lllE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 103,882 SQUARE FEET OR 2.38 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
:;:;;.~~~~."... LB.",)
PR~"i'iONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORIDA UCENSE N.Q, LS 4876
TH'~ DAY OFL/LI=.. 2004.
liQIE;
mE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY Of
SECTION 14, BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSlEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83{90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOClA lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: .J.IW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/11/04 SCALE: 1"-100' I REV: 10/20/04
AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE NW 1/4
OF lHE NW 1/4 OF SEC 14 50 26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: SECl4T-AE(AE1) I SHEET: 1 Of' 1
EXHIBIT A ..
page-'.Q..of I?Z5"
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 67 of 236
PROJECT 70'$C; '2/
PARCEl q :5 I
FOLIO 00 Cllt:.l;, q 000 (
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF. A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, l"tW 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORlli LINE SECTION 14
~ - - N87.25'49"E -I 1165.80'
P,O.C,
NW CORNER OF
SECTION 14
15.0J'
N67'2S'49"E
N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF
THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00416660001
in
d
....
co
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
170'
~
:.,
I")
~
IS'
~:
F.P.&L-Fl.ORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B,-POlNT OF BEGINNING
P.O. C.-POINT or COMMENCEMENT
~
a.
....
b
o
z
~
.~
co.
"':01
~:'"
<Dg
(fI
~
15.03'
S87'27.2J"W
Z....
W:::'
j!:~
z
~w""
wj!::::-
~~~
I-oz
(fINW
b5:::-j!:
"J
LSOUlli LINE OF lHE N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4
OF lHE NW 1/4
DFSCRIPTION OF A IS-FOOT STRIP OF lAND LYING IN THE NORTtI 1/2 OF TtlE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF lHE NORTliWEST
1/4 OF SECTlON 14, TOWNSHIP SO SOllTH, RANGE 26 OOT, COLUER COUNTY, F1..0RIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N6725'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,165.60
FEET ~LONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE N6725'49"E ALONG
SAlO UNE, ^ DISTANCE OF IS.0J FEET; THENCE RUN SOli49'JS"W, A DISTANCE OF 670.16 F"EET ALONG ^ UNE THAT
RUNS PAAALL.EL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE NClRTHWEST 1/4 or TliE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE
RUN S8727'ZJ"W, A DISTANCE OF 15.0J FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST
1/4 OF TliE NORTHWEST 1/4; T1-IENCE RUN NOli49'J5"E. A DISTANCE OF 610.15 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE OF A
170-FooT F1..0RIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGIfT-OF-WAY OOEMENT, SAID LINE RUNNING PARAllEL TO SAID
EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 10,053 SQUARE FEET OR 0.23 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
_:_--~~---~
JAME N. WILKISON (FOR lHE FIRM LB6773)
PRO SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
F1.. DA YCENSE NO LS 4876
'THIS~ '1)AY Of ~ 2004.
t:iO.IE;
ll-tE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A nELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 14. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '63/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, F1..0RIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: .JlW CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DATE: 7/31/04 SCALE: 1"..100' REV: 10/Z0/04
15' UTlUTY EASEMEHT IN lHE NW ~
or T1-IE NW 1 <4- OF SEC 14-S0-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SECI4T-AE PI SHEET: 1 or 1
EXHIBIT A
Page-k.L of I t;;' 0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 68 of 236
PROJECT 7ogC,;;. I
PARCEl '33:.2.. R.
FOLIO ()olflo'7?OOGJO 7
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN mE SW 1/4 OF mE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S.
RGE 26 E. COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF l
THE SW 1/4
N87-;Z9'OJ-
155.26
S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO,:
00410800007
'-1 1_
".I Z
~>4~
Q. '= hJ
0--'1/1
rrJ=<(
Q ::Jtd
~
F,P.&L. R!W
EASEMENT
/- - 170' '-
..... ~
. ~ ~,~
:Go. wi~
to .... ,.....
"'8 NO
NZ ~
N8T2S'49"E
1181.16'
"-
0...
...'
,~
~~
",'"
.....11.I
j!:iE..,.
,,-"-'
00-
.......~
Z'
::1-11.I
!-Vlj!:
CIlILI
~;!:~
'..J
P.0.B.(2) ~
it)
P.O.C.
SW CORNER OF
SECTION 11
P.O.B.(I) -
-.., 155.~7
I S67"25 49"W
~.J.LI
"!...
~...
"'.
'"
~
o
o
z
~
~
:to,
--~~
010
~ SE ~."
SW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1/4
SOUlll LINE SECTION 11
m:
F.P.&L-FLORIOA POWER & LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGIH-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C,-POlNT OF COMMENCEMENT
--~- -- --==---
JAMES . WIlKISON (FOR 'THE RRM LB6773)
PR SlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FtORID,A,.,I"lCENSE NO. LS 4876
'THIS ..t:L""T>AY OF ~ 2004.
f:IQJE.;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE: PLANE
COOROINA TE: SYStEM, Fl.A. EAST ZONE, '83/'90.
n-ns IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EM AIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEy AND HANSEN, llC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J,N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1-.100' REV: 3/15/05
AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4
OF THE SW 1 4 OF SEe II-50 26 PROJECT No: 020901 owe No:SEC1lT-AE(AEl1) SHEET: 1 OF 2
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 69 of 236
EXHIBIT A
page...6Z- of 11:)'0
PROJECT 70'69 ;L)
PARCEL ~ 3~ R
FOLIO 60'-/l0t60oa>7
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECnON 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E. COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPnON OF A PARCEL OF LAND l VlNG IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
(1 )COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECnON 11, THENCE RUN
N8T25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,181.16 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECnON 11
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NOO.49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 61.81 FEET
ALONG A LINE RUNNING PARAllEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH
1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN N89.10'1S"E, A
DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN SOO.49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF
52.59 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN S8T25'49"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.27 FEET ALONG
SAID SOUTI-l LINE OF SECnON 11 TO THE POINT OF' BEGINNING,
AND,
(2) COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECnON 11, THENCE RUN
N8T2S'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1181.16 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECnON 11;
THENCE RUN NOO.49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 76.S1 FEET ALONG A LINE RUNNING PARALLEL
TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO.49'42"E, A
DISTANCE OF 266.25 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE;
THENCE RUN N87'29'03"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.26 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE
RUN"SOO.49'4Z"W, A DISTANCE OF 275.30 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN
S89.10'18"W, A DISTANCE OF 155,00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 50,838 SQUARE FEET OR 1.17 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ~W CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-100' I REV: 3/15/05
AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN mE SW 1/"
OF' mE SW 1/4 OF' SEC 11-50-28 PROJECT No: 020901 OWO NO:SEC11T-AE(AEll)lsHEET: 2 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
Page~of ) 5""0
Agenda Item No. 1QC
May 10, 2005
Pa~e 70 of 236
PROJECT 7()~q~1
PARCEL q3 ~ R
FOLIO DO '7/ o "i!oooO 7
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A UTILITY EASEMENT
IN ll-lE SW 1/4 OF ll-lE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY. flORIDA
NORm UNE Of mE S 1/2 OF
mE S 1/2 Of mE SW 1/4 Of l
THE SW 1/4
r N87"29'03"E
15.03'
S 1/2 OF THE S 1/~ OF
SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00410800007
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
-170'
KEY:
F.P.&l.-FlORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O,C.-POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
UJ
Nt..
..... 0
~~
8'"
z
~
ON
~:'"
'00
::8:t
N~
IS'
P.O.B. ,/
N87'2S'49"E 1166.14' 61.81' -,1-
~ SOO.49'42"W ~
SOU:UNE SECTION 11 ~
DESCRIPTION OF A SlRlP OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH 1/2 Of THE SOUTH 1/2 OF mE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF mE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COMMENciNG AT THE SOUJl-fWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1" THENCE RUN N87'25'49-E, A DISTANCE Of 1,166.14
fEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECTION TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NOO.49'42"E, A DISTANCE
OF 34:5.07 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE Of A 170-fOOT flORIDA POwER AND UGHT RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT, SAID
UHE RUNNING PARALLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF SAID soum 1/2 OF' THE SOUTH 1/2 Of mE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF'
mE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN N87'29'0.3"E, A DISTANCE Of 15.0.3 FEET ALONG THE NORm UNE OF SAID SOUTH
1/2 Of mE SouTH 1/2 OF' THE SOUlHWEST 1/4 Of lHE SOUlHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN Soo.49'42"W, A DISTANCE
OF 266,25 F'EET ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE; mENCE RUN N8910'18"E, A DISTANCE OF
155.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE 15,00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN S89"10'18"W,
A DISTANCE OF 155.00 fEET; TliENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 61.81 fEET ALONG A UNE TliAT IS
PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN S87"2S'49"W. A DISTANCE Of 15.04 fEET ALONG SAID SOUTli UNE Of
SECTION 11 TO TliE POINT OF' BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 7.471 SQUARE FEET OR 0.17 ACRES, MORE OR lESS.
S87.25' 49"W
15,04'
;A-~- N, Yt1~;M LB677:5)
PR SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
Fl Ip~ ~~ENSE N~76
TliIS L+--"1>AY OF - 004, 'THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, llC DRAWN BY: ~W CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 3/15/05
IS' UTlUTY EASEMENT IN mE SW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1 <4- OF SEe 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SECI1T-AE(PlI) SHEET: 1 OF 1
. tiQIE;
TliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCE$. AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELO SURVEY Of
SECTION 11. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE. '6:5/90.
EXHIBIT /J
Page..l2!i.-of /t;"()
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 71 of 236
PROJECT 7o~9 ;1./
PARCEL 737 1<
FOLlO 00 t.{ Il<goooc.> fa
SKETCH .AND DESCRIPTION OF .A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 11
IN THE SE 1/4 AND THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
N87"?5'49"E
100.18'
~
w~
i!:~
VI
~....
....i!:
.... ~~
i5 ~~
~ it:
-< ~
w
SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
I&J
.
<'I,
.... ~
, N
01 .
:t~
8-
z
FOLlO NO.:
00411800006
~
I
~'"
. l')
"'c;i
~~
VI
~
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
FP&L - FLORIDA POWER
AND LIGHT COMPANY
O.R. - OFflCIf<L RECORD BOOK/pAGE
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
~
a:
~
e:
P.O.B. B7'25'49"W
I 40,00'
'!
-PR0PQSEi)15' - ~ ~ ~
UTILITY EASEMENT_ <'I <Q
- - 0
~ % S87"25' 49"W
~ <0 56.61'
01 ~
b g PROPOSED PRODUCTION
o WELL NO. 11
2: \ UT1L~y ~S~ENT
30' ROAO R/W
EASEMENT
PER OR 279/284
- "\--
~ SOUlli UNE
OF SECTION 11
P.O.C. SE CORNER
OF lHE SE 1/4 OF lHE SW 1/4
DESCRIPTION A PARCEL L YlNG IN THE SOUmEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION II, TOWNSHIP 50 soum,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUlHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUniWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN
Noo.49'42"(, A DISTANCE OF 90.16 FEET TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE Noo'49'42"E ALONG SAID
LINE, A DISTANCE OF 120.21 FEET; THENCE RUN N87'25'49"E, ^ DISTANCE OF 100.18 FEET ALONG A LINE lHAT IS
PARAlLEL TO niE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECllON 11; THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 180.32 FEET TO lHE
NORTH UNE OF THE NORTH UNE OF A 30-FOOT ROAD EASEMENT. AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 279,
PAGE 284; THENCE RUN SB7"25'49"W, A DISTANCE OF 56.61 FEET ALONG SAID NORlH EASEMENT; THENCE RUN
N02.:S:S'52"W, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; lHENCE RUN SB7.2S'49"W, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET AlONG A UNE
P ARAUEL TO SAID SOUlli UNE OF SECTION 11 TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONT~NING 15,525 SQUARE FEET OR 0.36 ACRES, MORE OR LES?
t \_ /'_
__~_ ____~J~______~__
JAM N. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB6773)
PRO SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORID.\ IJCENSE N~76
THIS J!:1.C"OA Y OF 004.
tiQIE;
lHE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA lED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEy OF
SECTION 11. BASIS Of BEARING: STAlE PL,6,NE
COORDINAlE SYSlEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, .8:S(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUiTE...., FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.Cot.4
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: WELL NO, 11 DATE: 8/26/04 SCALE: 1"-50' IREV: 3/15/05
TEMP. CONSlRUC1l0N EASEMENT LYING IN
THE SE 1/4 OF lHE SW 1/4 OF SECllON 11 PROJECT No: 020901 owe No: SEClIW-TC[(lCI1) I SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Page~ of f r; D
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 72 of 236
t..J
~
..,.
0.
:t"
8
II}
PROPOSED 15' I 587"25' 4S"W
UTILITY EASEMENT -----./ :-' (P.O.B. 43.58'
N
...,..
. I()
0>0
:t"d
0...,
o
:c: \
- - - r
L'
~~
L
PROJECT 7of)Q :2../
PARCEl 937 1<.
FOLIO 00<1 I ( <if 0000,,"
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF.A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 11
IN THE SE 1/4 AND "THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FlORIDA
...
ai
i3
~
~
'"
;8
ft
-t
"'-
j!:~
"-
ow
wi!:
~~
tn, :::
~- g
1M
8
d
<0
N87"25'49"E
>40.00
~
~
.;;
~
o
%
SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00411800006
30' ROAD R/W
EASEMEN T
PER O.R. 279/284
~SOUTH UNE SECllON 11
L- P,O.C,
SW CORNER
OF THE SE 1/4
OF THE SW 1/4
KEY;
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
FP&L - FlORIDA POWER
AND UGHT COMPANy
O.R. - OfFICIAL RECORD BooK/PAGI
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C, - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
DESCRIPTIOIj A PARCEL LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUrHl'tf::ST 1/4 OF' SECllON 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH.
RANGE 26 EAST. COWER COUNTY. FlORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAlD SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF 1HE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN
NOO.49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 30.05 FEET ALONG llfE WEST UNE OF SAlD SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF' lHE SOUTHWEST 1/4
TO lHE NORTH UNE OF A 30-FOOT ROAD EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OmCIAL RECORDS BOOK 279, PAGE 264,
AND, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'42"E ALONG SAlD UNE, A DISTANCE OF 60.11 FEET;
lHENCE RUN N87"2S'49"E, A DISTANCE Of' 40.00 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARAlLEL TO SAID NORlH EASEMENT
UNE; THENCE RUN S02'34'11"E, A DISTANCE OF 60,00 FEET; THENCE RUN SB7"25'49"W, A DISTANCE OF 43.56 FEET
ALONG SAID NORTH EASEMENT LINE TO THE POINT Of' BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2,507 SQUARE FEET OR 0.06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
JAi..E~.1~~~-;; LB.",)
PR~~iO:lt. SURVEYOR AND MAPPER .
FlORID~ I.JCENSE NO, l-S 4676
THIS f"<QAY OF~005. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA lES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUllE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA .33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EM AIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPlION: WELL NO, 11 DAlE: 8/26/04 SCALE: 1-..30' I REV: 3/14/05
PRODUCTION WELL UTIUTY EASEMENT IN THE
Sf 1/4 AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEe 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG NO:SECllW-TCE(pn~ SHEET: 1 OF 1
riQIt;
lliE PARCEl BEARING. DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINA TE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83,1'90.
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 73 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Page~of I~()
PROJECT
PARCEL
F OLI 0
70t6t;;z/
7 3<g R
0041/~o~"
A
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 AND THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
~
1:i
5~
~Il::
l/);;!
ffiz
o4(
ffiu
:J:
30'
1/1""
......
""~
, ". I ~:
.. <'Ii!:
F.P.&:L ......
~ EA~~ENT ~ ~
" ~) ~~
"" WW
I !'> z j!=
tJ"
I
1
W
;:r;
0,
1011)
gC!
Z~
S 1/2 OF lHE S 1/2
OF lHE NW 1/4 OF lHE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00411800006
N87'38'47"E
587"3847"W
1065.23'
'065.2
S UNE OF THE 5 1/2 OF THE S 1/2
OF lliE NW 1/4 OF" THE 5W 1/4
P.O.C.
SE CORNER
or THE S 1/2 OF lHE S 1/2
OF lHE NW 1/4 OF lHE SW 1/4
DESCRIPTION' A 30 FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN mE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE soum 1/2 OF mE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
THE soumWEST 1/4. OF SECTION I'. TOWNSHIP 50 soum. RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, f1.0RIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID soum 1/2 OF THE soum '12 OF mE NORTHWEST '/4 OF" THE
SOUlliVl'EST 1/4, mENCE RUN S87'38'47"W, A DISTANCE OF 170.26 FEET ALONG THE soum UNE OF SAID SOUTH
1/2 OF mE soum '/2 OF. mE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST '/4; THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE
OF" 20.03 FEET ALONG mE WEST LINE Of A 170-FOOT f1.0RlDA POWER AND LIGHT (FPL) RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT
TO THE POINT OF" BEGINNING; THENCE RUN S67'3S'47"W, A DISTANCE OF 1065.24 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT IS
PARAlLEL TO SAID SOUTH LINE, TO THE EAST UNE OF THE HENDERSON CREEK CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY: THENCE RUN
NOO"5Q'34"E, A DISTANCE OF JO,05 FEET ALONG SAID CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE; THENCE RUN N87'38'47"E. A
DISTANCE OF 1065.23 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARALLEL TO SAID SOUTH UNE TO SAID WEST LINE OF mE FPL
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEl.tENT; mENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 30.05 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO mE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 31.957 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.73 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
MQJEi
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES,
AND AREAS CALOULA TED ARE
BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING:
STATE PlANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,
FLA.. EAST ZONE. '83i90.
KEY:
COR. - CORNER
F .P.&\... - n.ORIDA PO'ItER '" UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-or-WAY
P.O,B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.c. - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
JA S N. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM L86773)
P FESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORIQ~ J.lCENSE NO. J.,S4876
THIS L.:2-o'lA.oA Y OF ~OOS.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1"-200' REV: J/ll/OS
TEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
IN SECTION 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC11T-AE(TC6) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Page~Of I~D
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
page/74 of 236
PROJECT 70 <69;z
PARCEl <63'i5
FOLIO CJot.{ /I '60000 fo
t,
~~
J.
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN mE sw 1/4 OF SECllON 11, 1WP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
w
r~ ~
I~ ~
Z
PROPOSED L
UTILITY
E^SEMENT~
20' I
1-__ -
I , I
II
II
NORTH LINE OF THE S 1/2
OF THE S 1/2 OF mE
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 ~
FOLIO NO.:
00411800006
S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2
OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
m
F.P.&L - flORIDA POl'tER " UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-or-WAY
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C, - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
soum UNE OF" mE S 1/2 J
OF THE S 1/2 OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
I I
f
I
15'-/ _
I
N6T42'01"E
155.23'
170'
~
~ w~~
~i;; j!=~w
* N lo. Ill;!:
" "" ow....
8'" w;!:o
1/1 ZLL""
:lo'-
. t;~;
LJ~~
o
F.P.&:L.
EASEMENT
S6T36'47"W
155,24'
p.o.e.
SE CORNER OF
THE S 1/2 or
lHE S 1/2 OF
lHE NW 1/4 OF
lHE SW 1/4
DESCRIPTION; A PARCEL OF LAND L YlNG IN mE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE' 'soum 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 soum, RANGE 26 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAIO SOUTH 1/2 Of mE SOUTH 1/2 Of mE NORTH~ST 1/4 OF mE
SOUTHWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN S8T38'47"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.24 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID soum
1/2 OF THE SOUTH '/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTH~ST 1/4; mENCE RUN NOO"49'42"E, A DISTANCE
OF 343.06 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF mE soum 1/2 OF
THE NORTH~ST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN N6r42'01"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.23 FEET ALONG THE
NORTH UNE Of SAID SOUl1-f 1/2 OF mE SOUTH 1/2 OF mE NORlliWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTH~ST 1/4: mENCE
RUN SOO"49'42"W. A DISTANCE OF 342.91 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
. CONTAINING 53,163 SQUARE FEET, OR 1.22 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
:w.-~~~'R'" "'6"')
PRO~~~~~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
flORIDA LICENSE NO. LS 4876
THIS~ DAY OF .cz:4::;-2004.
I:iQIE,;
mE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY Of
SECTION 11. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINA TE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '63/90.
nilS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4. FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEy AND HANSEN, Ll.C DRAWN BY: JRf CHECKED BY; J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPlJON: DATE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1"-100' IREV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT
IN SEcnON 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC1IT-AE(AEIl) I SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Pag&~of --;w
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 75 of 236
PROJECT
PARCEL
FOL 10
7ogC;;1..1
'1 '5'6' R
00,/1' ct~~h
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF
A UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 AND THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FlORIDA
~
N87'42'01"E
15.02'
I ~ 170'
I F.P .&:L.
R/W
EASEMENT
UI.z
w-
i!';t:
II)
~w
<'Ii!'
::-~
III
""
11.I'-
j!:~
~~
1-'-'1 wl.Ll
~ %;i!'
iU"
N UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2
Of THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW l!4
~~ FOLIO NO,: 15'
w 00411 800006
. s 1/2 OF mE S 1/2
zO:: ~ OF mE NW 1/4 OF tHE SW 1/4
~;;! }l"
o::z 8~
""-c
Ou 20'
ffi z....
r N87'38'47"E '065.24'
S87'38'4rw 1080.27'
S UNE OF lliE S l!2 OF THE S l!2 P.O.C.
OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 SE CORNER
OF THE S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2
OF THE NW l!4 OF THE SW 1/4
DESCRIPTION: II STRIP OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH '12 OF lliE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST l!4 OF lliE
SOUlliVwEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlli, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF lliE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4. THENCE RUN S87"38'4rw. A DISTANCE OF 155.24 FEET ALONG THE SOUlli LINE OF SAID
SOUlli 1/2 OF THE SOUlli 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4 TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING:
lliENCE CONTINUE S87'38'47 W. A DISTANCE OF" 1080.2.7 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH '/2 OF"
THE ..sOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE EAST LINE OF THE HENDERSON
CREEK CANAl RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN Noo'50'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 20.03 FEET ,.,LONG SAID CANAL
RIGHT-Of-WAY; THENCE RUN N87'38'47"E, A DISTANCE Of 1065,~4 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL TO
SAID SOUlli LINE TO THE WEST UNE OF A 170-FOOT f1.ORIOA POWER AND LIGHT R1GHT-0F"-WAY EASEl.tENT
LINE: THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 323.04 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE, SAID
UNE RUNNING PARAlllt. TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUlli 1/2. OF lliE SOUTH '/2 OF THE NORTHWEST l!4
OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN N87"42'01"E, A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET AlONG lliE NORTH LINE OF
SAID SOUTH '/2 OF THE SOUlli l!2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN
SOO'49'42"W. A DISTANCE OF" 343.06 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALlEL TO SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 26.451 SQUARE FEET, OR 0,61 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
~~;;U:~AR" La,,")
PRi~~~~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.0R1Q~ LICENSE NO..J..S 4876
THIS J:'fl::"aAY OF~2005. lHlS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
. , SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLW" SUllE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREEID AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRlpnON: DAlE: 8/'1.7/04 SCALE: 1"-200' REV: 3/ll/05
unuTY EASEMENT
IN SECl10N 11-50-'1.6 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No: SECllT-AE(P6) SHEET: 1 OF ,
liQ1E;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES,
AND AREAS CALC\JLA TED ARE
Bfo.SED ON A AELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING:
STA TE PlANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,
FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
ISO:
COR. - CORNER
F.P.1d.. - Fl..ORIOA POWER de UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C, - POINT OF COIoIMEHCEMENT
EXHIBIT A
P.ge~of I~(/
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 76 of 236
PROJECT 7 c>~q ~ I
PARCEL f5'3 Cf
FOLIO DOLI 110"1000:2,
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUN1Y, FLORIDA
NORTH LINE Of THE S 1/2 OF
THE N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF \
THE SW 1/4 OF lliE SW 1/4 ,
II
~ '"
NNUl
'-~w
;;;cnj!:
ww~
j!=i!'...,.
~~~
w<'l'"
z~1I)
:::J W
t-zj!:
~iEb~
"'J
THE S 1/2 Of THE N 1/2 Of THE S
1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00411040002
N87'30'41"E
155,26
/-170'-
8 ~ . f,P.&L. R/W 'f
~~~ ~!ri EASEMENT ~ ~
~ 2 ~ I~ ;:: ;:: g
a..::;lw 0 - ..- ~
'\
W:
f,P,&:L.-FLORIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.B.-POlNT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF CO"'MENCE"'ENT
P.O.C.
SW CORNER OF
SECTION 11
SOUlli UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
j 1181.16' '- SOU~ LINE SECTION 11
N87"25'49"E
DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF lliE NORlli 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE
SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF SECTION II, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlli, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY,
FLORIDA:
COM...ENClNG AT lliE SOUlliWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, THENCE RUN N87"25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,181.16
FEET AlONG THE SOUlli UNE OF SAID SECTION: THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A OISTANCE OF 343.06 FEET ALONG A
LINE THAT RUNS PARAUEL TO THE EAST UNE OF lliE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4 TO lliE POINT OF
BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 171.53'F.EET ALONG A UNf lliAT RUNS PARAlLEL TO
THE EAST UNE OF SAID SOUlli 1/2 Of lliE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUlli 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE
SOUlliWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN N87"30'41"E, A OISTANCE Of 155.26 FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID SOUTH
1/2 Of THE NORTH 1/2 OF lliE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN
SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 171.46 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN S87"29'03"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.26
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUlli 1/2 Of lliE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 26,581 SQUARE FEET OR 0.61 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM !.B6773)
PR SlONAL SURVEYOR AND "'APPER
FLORIDA Ll.CENSE NO. LS 4676
THIS ~~AY OF ~OO4.
liQIE;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF SEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTE..., FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
lHlS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEfft<EY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, u..c DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRJPllON: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1".100' REV: 10/20/04
AN ACCESS EASEl.tENT IN lliE SW 1/4
OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG NO:SEC11T-AE(AE10 SHEET: 1 OF 1
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 77 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Page-1e..of /':;0
PROJECT 70.gQ :1./
PARCEl q 3 q
FOLIO Do 'I fI 0 'f OO<J 2.
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
THE S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2
OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00411040002
111
~~
~...:
8~
z
170'-
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
~ :r:
<'1<'11/)
,';:::-1.01
~ ;;; VI j!:
b; "" 1.01 ~
:t' j!:j!;...
~ ~~';:::-
wt"~
z~l/)
:J 1.01
f-zj!;
Vlw ...,.
i:.ij!;~';:::-
'-J
NORTH UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE N '/2 OF THE S '/2 OF \
THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 \
II~N87'30'4'"E
! 15,02'
KEY:
F.P.&:L-FLORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
ia.
~~
-0.
:t'
~
P.O.B.
15.03'
S87"29'03"W
P.O.C.
SW CORNER OF
SECTION 11
SOUTH LINE Of lliE S 1/2 OF
THE N '/2 OF lliE S 1/2 Of
lliE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
N87'25'49"E 1166.14'
I'
'-- SOUTH LINE SECTION 11
DESCRIPTION OF A 15-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF lliE NORTH 1/2 Of THE SOUTH '/2 OF
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOU lli , RANGE 26 EAST, COWER
COUNTY, f1.ORIOA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUlliWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION '1, THENCE RUN N87"25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,166,14
FEET '''LONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECTtON; THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 343,07 FEET ALONG A
LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST, '/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGlNN.ING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'42"E, A DIST~NCE OF 171.54 FEET ~LONG THE WEST UNE OF A HO-FooT
FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEl.tENT, SAID LINE RUNNING PARAu.EL TO lliE EAST UNE Of SAID
SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NOR'lli 1/2 OF lliE SOU'lli 1/2 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF lliE SOUlliWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN
N87'30'41"E, A DISTANCE OF '5.02 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH I/.2 OF THE NORTH l/2 OF THE
SOUTH 1/2 Of THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN SOO'4942"W, A DISTANCE Of H1.53
FEET AlONG ~ LINE RUNNING PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE: THENCE RUN S87"29'03"W, A DISTANCE OF 15.03 FEET
ALONe THE SOUTH LINE SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF lliE NORlli '/2 Of THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHWEST l/4, AND TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2.573 SQUARE FEET OR 0.06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
J.;;.Es~~~ L0677J)
PR=~it<;k,R\JEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.0Rlp~ !.IGENSE NO 4876
llilS ~AY OF 2004.
~
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FlELO SURVEY OF
SECTION ,1. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEt.l, FLA, EAST ZONE. '83/'90.
11"ns IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN. LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIP110N: DAlE: B/3/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 10/20/04
15' UTlUTY EASEMENT IN lliE SW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1 4 Of SEe 11-50-28 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEcm-AE(Pl0) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Page~of I 'fJO
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 78 of 236
PROJECT 70~C;:l1
PARCEl _ t:6 't D
FOLIO _00 l.( II 7 :J.. 000 S-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
. 170'
8 ~ ~w F.P.&L. R/W
~ ~ ~ ;; ~ EASEMENT
O....J(Il ... -
Q: .=..:( . ......
Q::>w 8 -
\{Z
_ _ IT ~f=".
'- SOUTH LINE SECnON '1
NORTH UNE OF THE N 1/2 OF
THE N '/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF -
mE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
THE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2
OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
KEt: 00411720005
F.P.&:L-f1.0RIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
P.O.C.
SW CORNER Of
SECTION 11
SOUTH LINE Of lliE N 1/2 OF
THE N 1/2 OF lliE S 1/2 OF
lliE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
N87'25'49"E -I "BU6'
~ 3t
<'INI/)
':::-....
~V>j!:
3t w~~
~ j!:F...,.
, ...,. I&. ~:::-
~ ~ ~N3t
~ ~ z:::-V>
in:J W
f-zj!:
I/)W ...,.
~;;~:::-
"J
DESCRIPTION Of A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN mE NORm 1/2 OF lliE NORTH 1/2 Of mE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE
SOUtHWEST 1/4 Of lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 1" TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY,
f1.0RIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUlliWEST CORNER Of SAID SECTION 11, lliENCE RUN N8T25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,181,16
FEET 'ALONG THE soum LINE OF SAID SECTION: tHENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF" 514.59 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARAllEL TO mE EAST LINE OF THE soumWEST 1/4 OF' THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO lliE POINT OF
BEGINNING: lliENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF' 171.5.:5' FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARAl1.El TO
lliE EAST LINE OF SAIO NORTH 1/2 OF mE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUlli 1/2 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF tHE
SOUtHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN N87'32'IB"E. A DISTANCE OF 155.26 FEET ALONG THE NORlli LINE OF SAID NORlli
1/2 OF mE NORm 1/2 OF mE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN
SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 171.45 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE: lHENCE RUN 587'30'41"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.26
FEET ALONG mE soum LINE SAID NORlli 1/2 OF THE NORlli 1/2 OF THE soum 1/2 OF lliE SOUlHWEST 1/4 Of
lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4, AND TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 26,581 SQUARE FEET OR 0.61 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
J:;""~~"'tOR-;;;e~~ '"'m)
PR~O~AL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.ORIDA7~~ENSE NQ._I.S 4876
THIS ~vAY OF()~ 2004.
lliUE;
lliE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES. AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF
SECllON 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFf KEY C. COONER AND ASSOCIAlES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT M't'ERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX; (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEl DESCRIPTlON: DAlE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 10/20/04
AN ACCESS EASDAENT IN THE SW 1/4
OF lliE SW 1 4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: SEC11T-AE(AED) SHEET: , OF' ,
EXHIBIT A
Page-'u"of {'!:o
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 79 of 236
PROJECT 70 <<'1 ~ I
PARCEl Cj '-f 0 _.u
FOLIO Ot) 1I1/ 7 ').. ()OO S-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 1" 1WP 50 S,
RGE 26 E. COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
THE N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 t.:~
OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 : "1
FOUO NO.: ~ E
~: 00411720005 ~
F.P.&:L-FlORIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.S.-POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.B. ~
P'OI(C_P:T::EH[;~~ ~/~ : ~' ; ,'j,' :: i; it~7~~'41"W
SECTION 11 THE SW 1/4 OF lliE SW 1/4 811)
. z
N87'25' 49"E 1166"4
- - - I "-- SOUni L1~ ~CTION 11
170'
F.P.&L. R/W
~ t EASEMENT
'::...
~~
t~
~ <'I ~ 1\11
<~'w II'J
;Vlj!: /.
~ ...w~
~ i!'i!'...,.
~ 1515~
8 wNil:
z Z'VI
::J~W
I-Zj!=
IIlW ~
~j!:~~
'-J
NORTH LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF
THE N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 Of \
THE SW '/4 OF lliE SW 1/4 ,
r- N87'32'18"E
11M2'
L
DESCRIPTION OF A 15-FOOT STRIP OF LAND L'I1NG IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF lliE NORTH 1/2 OF mE SOUTH 1/2 OF
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlliWEST '/4 Of' SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 scum, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER
COUNTY, f1.ORIDA:
CO...MENCING AT lliE SOUll-fWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, THENCE RUN N87'25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF ',166.14
FEn ALONG lliE SCUTti LINE OF SAID SECTION; niENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DIST"NCE OF 514.61 FEET ALONG"
LINE lliAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE or THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE SOUlliWEST 1/4 TO mE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE Of' 171:53 FEET ALONG niE WEST UNE OF A nO-FOOT
flORIDA POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASE"'ENT, SAID LINE RUNNING PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID
NORTti 1/2 OF THE NORlli '/2 Of lliE SOUTH 1/2 OF lliE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF lliE SOUlliWEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN
N87'32'18"E, A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORlli '/2 OF THE NORlli 1/2 Of lliE
SOUlli 1/2 OF lliE soumWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 171.53
FEET ALONG A LINE RUNNING PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN S87'30'41"W, A DISTANCE OF 15.03 FEET
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE SAID NORlli 1/2 OF THE NORm 1/2 OF lliE SOUTH 1/2 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4, AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2,573 SQUARE FEET OR 0.06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
__~____~Ld~
JAM N. v"LKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB6773) ,
PRO SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlOR\tl~ L1CJ:NSE N~ ~4876
THIS ::::.0fJAY OF ~ 2004.
l:illlE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A RELD SURVEY OF
SEcnON 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTE..., flA. EAST ZONE. '83(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
~EY C. COONER AND ASSOClA TE5. INC.
SURVE'l'lNO AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUllE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAIL.: SURVEYlNGCCOONER,CQM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: ""'w CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEl. DESCRIPllON: DAlE: 8/3/04 SCALE: '"-100' IREV: 10/20/04
15' UllUTY EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4 OF
THE SW '/4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No:SEC11T-AE(P9>1 SHEET: 1 Of 1
EXHIBIT A
page-:z2... of I t;D
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 80 of 236
PROJECT 70 ~ C; ~ I
PARCEl <D <f I
r:: Ol 10 00 I..{ II 00000 6
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION ", TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORlli LINE OF THE S ,/2 OF \
THE N 1/2 OF THE SW l/4 OF--.J
THE SW 1/4
N87'35'32"E
1 :>:),2:)"
L~
~~
L
IS.EY:
F.P.&l.-f1.ORlDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.S.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O. C.-POINT Of COM"'ENCEMENT
S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00411000000
I
:-~ 170'
( F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
~'~ ~
0> ,
~~
z
~ ~...,.
. <'I~
0; ~ :::--~
rJ;" In In
~ ~ w'"
I/) j!:i!:...,.
~~~
...N~
z';::-I/I
::J W
I-zj!
InI.rJ
~;;~
'-J
SOUTH LINE OF lliE S 1/2 OF
(THE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
I THE SW 1/4
o I-
'" Z
~~~
g,::; tj (
D:F<(
D-::>w
I.rJ
.
~~ ~~
-f SW CORNER OF > ~ ~
SEClION 11 co ,~
"'f~
^ --::;.
- - - N87'25'49"E V "BU6' '- SOUlli LINE SECTION 11
DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEl OF LAND LYING IN lliE SOUlli 1/2 OF lliE NORlli 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST l/4 OF lliE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlli, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA:
~ ! r P.O.B.
I 155.26'
S8T32'18"W
<".
I---
CO......ENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, lliENCE RUN N87'25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,181.16
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAlO SECTION; lliENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 686.12 FEET ALONG A
LINE lliAT RUNS PARAlLEL TO lliE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE SOUTHWEST l/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 343.06 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARAU.EL TO
THE EAST LINE Of SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF lliE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; lliENCE
RUN N87'35'32"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.25 FEET ALONG THE NORlli UNE Of SAID SOUTH 1/2 Of THE NORTH 1/2 OF
THE SOUTH\\"EST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: lliENCE RUN Soo'49'42"W, A DISTANCE Of 342.91 FEET ALONG SAIO
EAST LINE: THENCE RUN S87'32'18"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.26 FEET ALONG lliE SOUTH LINE SAID SOUlli 1/2 OF THE
NORlli 1/2 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4, AND TO lliE POINT Of BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 53,163 SQUARE FEET OR '.22 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
,^",~~<t1-;H;~~ LB6773)
PR~~~vE:YOR AND "'APPER
f1.0~3A ,UCENSE NO,," t,S 4876
THl .. DAY OF <.1!...t=; 2004.
WllE.;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A fiELD SURVEY Of
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STAlE PlANE
COORDINA"IE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE. '83/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAl BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYlERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: '"-100' I REV: 10/20/04
AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN lHE SW 1/4
Of THE SW 1/4 Of" SEe 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC11T-AE(AE8) ISHEET: 1 OF 1
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 81 of 236
EXHIBIT A
~llQ,-1:Lo' I ~o
PROJECT 70 ~ '7 ;1.. /
PARCEL q tf I
FOLIO ..<?~tfl.tOOOOOO
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF' SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORlH UNE OF lHE S 1/2 OF j
lHE N 1/2 OF lHE SW '/4 Of
THE SW 1/4
N87'35'3Z"E
15,02'
170'
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
ID:
F.P.&:L.-f1.0RIDA POWER &: UGHT co.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO,:
00411000000
bJ
.
~l-.
- 0
~~
z
iI'
.
8~
~~
~
w
~
...,.
c"
b
o
z
~...,.
,
~~
-~
1/)1/)
wW
j!:j!:...,.
\5\5~
w~~
z~
:::J W
...ziE
~wl.L.
wj!:o
"J
SOUlli UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE N '/2 OF lHE SW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1/4 P.O.s.
15.02'
S87'32'1 B"W
P.O,C.
I (SW CORNER OF
--t _ "'CTIOO 11
NB7"25'49"E
V'
1166.14'
w
.
<'I
.......,.
Ol~
:t'.o
8:&
z
'- scum LINE SECTION 11
DESCRIPTION OF A 15-F"OOT STRIP Of LAND LYING IN THE SOUlli 1/2 Of THE NORTH 1/2 Of lllE SOUTHWEST 1/4
OF lliE/SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION ll, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlH, RANGE 26 E"ST, COWER COUNTY, F"LORID":
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1'. lliENCE RUN N87"25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,166.14
FEET ALONG THE SOUlll UNE OF SAID SECll0N; lliENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E. A DISTANCE OF 686,'4 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF lllE SOUTHWEST '/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO lliE POINT OF
BEGINNING; nlENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE Of 343.07 FEET ALONG THE Ytt:ST UNE Of A 170-FOOT
F"LORlDA POYtt:R AND UGHT RIGHT-Of-W"Y EASEMENT. S"ID UNE RUNNING P"RALLEl TO THE EAST lINE OF SAID
SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH '/2 OF" THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE SOUlliWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN N87'35'32"E, A
DISTANCE OF 15.02 fEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF S,6.JD SOUTH l/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF lliE SOUlliWEST '/4
OF ll-IE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 343.06 FEET "LONG A LINE RUNNING PARALLEL
TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN S67'32'18"W, A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE SAID SOUTH 1/2
OF lliE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUlHWEST l/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST l/4, AND TO lHE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 5,146 SQUARE FEET OR 0.'2 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
.J~
N. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB6773)
PR SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
F"L 100A LJCENSE N0. LS 4876
llitS 'Bd"bAY OF~ 2004.
liQIE;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEYOr
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '63i90,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE'l'lNGCCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, u.c DRAVtt>I BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DAlE: 8/3/04 SCALE; 1"-100' REV: 10/20/04
15' UT\UlY EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1 4 OF SEe 11 50-26 PROJECT No; 020901 DWG No:SEC11T-AE(P8) SHEET: 1 OF" 1
EXHIBIT A
Page...1.L of I c;-o
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 82 of 236
PROJECT ..J 0 i5 q .2/
PARCEL _ 7 4 ~
FOLIO 20'1115";< Cb61
-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO" 10
IN 'mE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11. TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
N 1/2 OF THE N '/2 OF THE
SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 N8n5'32"E
FOLIO NO,; 100.16'
00411520001
KEY:
F.P.&:L-f1.ORIOA POWER &: UGHT C(.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.C. - POINT OF COMMENCMENT
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
t~
~~
J.
a,
....
~
~
~
o.~
...,.....
~~
I
I O~I-
"'::Jz
l:jF'w
a.:J~
O. VI
[~j
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
170'
.....
.
~
~
o
o
~
:-'
<'I
..,.
0.
:t-
o
o
z
/l~
lJ...o
Ov
N'
,.....
.....~
ZVl
wW
~~
IJ...IJ...
oOv
wN'
z'~
::J~3:
I-ZVl
Vlww
~~~
DESCRIPTlQN;
S87"35'J'}"W
,. . .ul.06'" P.O.C.-SE CORNER OF THE N
~ 1/2 Of THE N 1/2 Of THE SW
N iS~ 1/4 Of lliE SW 1/4 ~
.,"lfeo 1=0 ~
010 U2;~'"
~:t- g 8:1::J:J>I1/ S67"35'32"W
~ ~-< ,
60.10' ...- 0.. ~::l '" 210.33
587"3532 W P.O,S. I ~
SOUTH LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF THE N
1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
A PARCEL LYING IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF lliE NORlli 1/2 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE soumWEST '/4 OF
SECTION 11, TO\\NSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, nORIOA, DESCRIBED AS FOLlOW:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of SAID NORlli 1/2 OF lliE NORTH 1/2 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of lliE
SOUTHWEST 1/4, THENcE RUN SOUTH 87"35'32- WEST, A DISTANC~ OF 210.33 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID
NORlli 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUlliYlEST 1/4 OF lliE SOuTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING:
THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 87'35'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60.10 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE: THENCE RUN NORTH
00"49'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 180.29 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARALLEL TO lliE EAST UNE Of SAID NORTH
'/2 OF THE NORlli 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN NORTH 87"35'32" EAST, A
DISTANCE Of 100.16 FEET ALONG A LINE lliA T IS PARALlEl TO SAID SOUTH UNE: THENCE RUN SOUlli 00'49'42"
WEST, A DISTANCE Of '30.21 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE OF A 170-FooT flORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEl.tENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 87'35'32" WEST,
A DISTANCE OF 40.06 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARAlll:L TO SAID SOUlli LINE: lliENCE RUN SOUlli 00'49'42"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.08 FEET ALONG A LINE mAT IS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE, AND TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 16,028 Sq. Ft., OR 0.37 Ac. MORE OR LESS.
:;.~.Q"-,,;:L.~ ';;E~~~ ISm,)
PRg~ONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
flORIDA UCENSE NO:o~~76
llilS 'l..3dltJAY OF 004.
tiQIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FlElO SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COOROINA lE SYSlEt.4, A.A. EAST ZONE, '8Ji90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4. FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 fAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl.: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, ll.C DRAWN BY: -"/l.l CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: WEll. NO. 10 DATE; 8/17/04 SCALE: 1".60' IREV: 10/20/04
TEUP. CONS]RUCTION EASEMENT IN THE
SW 1/4 Of THE SW 1/-4- OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 ~WG NOSECl1W-TCE(TC10j SHEET: 1 OF 1
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 83 of 236
EXHIBIT A~
Pag.~of I t;"o
PROJECT 70 ~q :</
PARCEL q ~ ~
F OLI 0 00 '-I If ~-.;t c:tX> I
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 10
N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF THE
SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUO NO,:
00411520001
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
KQ:
F.P.&:L.-FlORIOA POWER &: LIGHT CO,
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.C. - POINT OF COI.t...ENCMENT
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
N87"35'32"E
40.06'
<;) ~ I- I
W-2;
~ 19;=!~
. a. JW
N O. VI
.~ g: ~~ I F.P.&L. R/W
~ ~ EASEMENT
o
~- I'-
170'
w
.
N
..,.
a,
~
o
o
z
a,
o
d
It)
w
.
N
~
OJ
..,.
8
Z
.....
.....0
0..,.
N'
,~
~:r:
z(J)
WW
j!:F
IJ..IJ..
oo~
wN'
z'~
:J~:r:
Z(J)
I-
(J)ww
L;)j!:j!:
~
d
It)
WELL SITE
NO. 10
170.27'
40.06'
S87'35'32"W
P.O.B.
SOUTH LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF
l'HE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
CONTAINING 2,006 Sq. Ft., OR 0.05 Ac. "'ORE OR LESS.
---~. --JJ-L_____
JAME , WILKISON (FOR Tl-tE FIRM lB6773)
PRO SlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORIQ.6. I4CENSE NO, LS 4676
THIS ~'DAY OF ~2004.
tm]I;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA rrD ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SEcnON 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STArr PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTE..., FlA. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA lESt INC.
SURVE'I'1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239}277-7179 EMAIl: SURVE'I'1NGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. LLC DRAWN BY: JNM CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: WELL NO, 10 DATE: 6/17/04 SCALE: 1".20' REV: 10/20/04
PROOUClION WELL UlIUTY EASE"'ENT IN Tl-t
SW 1 .. OF THE SW 1 4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SECllW-TCE(pl0 SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
page....1.1- of ,!; 0
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 84 of 236
PROJECT 70 f5 q ~/
PARCEl <6L/ 3
F OLI 0 00 if I' 5 .;< OC!f2.1
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF ~E SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
155.25'
~ S87'35'J2"W
" <'I
P.O.C. cQ ...,.
-+ SW CORNER OF CQ''''
SEcn"" 11 _ _ D ~ ~
- - - N87"25'49"E 11181.16' '- SOUlli LINE SECTION 11
DESCRIPpON OF A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN lliE NORTH 1/2 OF lliE NORlli 1/2 OF THE SOU~WEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHwEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA:
SOUlli LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF
THE N 1/2 OF lliE SW 1/4 OF
~E SW 1/4
155.24
NORTH UNE OF THE N 1/2 OF
THE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 or
THE SW 1/4
W:
F.P.&:L-flORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Or-WAY
P.O.B.-POlNT Of BEGINNING
P.O. C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO,:
00411520001
-170'
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
P.O.B.
~ 15...,.
. <'I'
;; ~ ::.--;
~: zVl
.., Q ""w
~ j!:j!:...,.
15~::'--
I&I~~
z_
::J W
I-zj!:
~~~
"J
in
COMMENCING AT THE SOUlliWEST CORNER OF SAm SECTION 11, lliERCE RUN N87"25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,181.16
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE: OF 1028.18 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO lliE EAST UNE OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4 Of THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANce: OF 343.06 FEET ALONG A LINE lliAT RUNS PARAll.EL TO
lliE EAST LINE OF SArD NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORlli 1/2 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4: THENCE
RUN N87"36'47"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.24 FEET ALONG THE NORlli LINE OF SAID NORlli 1/2 OF THE NORlli 1/2 OF
lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 342.91 FEET ALONG SAID
EAST LINE; THENCE RUN S87"35'32"W, ^ DISTANCE OF 155.25 FEET ALONG rnE SOUTH UNE SAID NORm 1/2 OF
THE NORlli 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF mE SOUlliWEST 1/4, AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 53,163 SQUARE FEET OR 1.22 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
--~- _.J~====-
JAME . WILKISON (FOR lliE FIRM LB67703)
PR SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
flORIDA UCENSE NQ, ),.S 4a76
llilS ~'tlAY OF~ 2004.
WllE;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlElD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, f1.A. EAST ZONE, '83/"90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCfA TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 04, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAlL: SURVEYlNCCCOONER.COM
CUENT; GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: .MW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEl DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/03/04 SCALE:: 1"-100' REV: 10/20/04
AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4
OF mE SW 1 4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SECllT-AE(AE7) SHEET: 1 OF 1
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 85 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Page 7'6 of , ,,0
PROJECT 70 f/i 711
PARCEL 9 'f 3
FOLIO 004 115 :l. O::l? (
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECll0N 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, Fl ORIOA
N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO,:
00411520001
170'
F.P.&L R/W
EASEMENT
L'
~ f~
;"
~ J.
z
NORTH LINE OF THE N 1/2. OF. j
THE N l/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
lliE SW 1/4
!\. N67"3S'47"E
''- 15.02.'
W:
F.P.&:L-f1.0RIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O. B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POlNT OF COMMENCEl.tENT
W
.
~....
;,,~
""'!2
g..,
Z
- ~
lS~
~~
~
~...
,
~~
-~
zl/)
WW
j!:j!:...,.
.......,
00-
w~a
z_
:J ""
I-zj!:
~*13
"-J
P.O.C.
-+ SW CORNER OF
SECTION 11
---
(SOUlli LINE OF THE N 1/2. OF
THE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF "S8~;g.~2"W
THE SW 1/4 P.O.B. ~
w
.
<'I- ;>
~~
...,.'"
8. S
N8T25'49"E /' 1166.14' Z ~
'- SOUlli LINE SECTION 11
<;>
f-
I
I--
DESCRIPTION OF A IS-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTH 1/2 Of lliE NORlli 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4
OF THE-'SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, f1.0RIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11. THENCE RUN N87"25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,166.14
FEET ALONG lliE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SEcnON: THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 1029.22 FEET ALONG A
UNE lliAT RUNS PARAlLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUE NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 343.07 FEET ALONG lliE WEST LINE OF A 170-FOOT
f1.ORIDA POWER AND UGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID LINE RUNNING PARAlLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF SAID
NORlli 1/2 Of THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN N87'38'47"E, A
DISTANCE Of 15.02 FEET ALONG lliE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORlli 1/2 OF lliE NORlli 1/2 Of THE SOUlliWEST 1/4
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: lliENCE RUN Soo'49'42"W. A DISTANCE OF 343.06 FEET ALONG A LINE RUNNING PARALLEL
TO SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN S67"35'32"W, A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET ALONG THE SOUlli LINE SAID NORlli 1/2
Of lliE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, AND TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 5,146 SQUARE FEET OR 0.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
J..N~~~" lS.m)
PR~i:~~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORlI,l,6, U.!:ENSE NQ, ~ 4876
THIS ~fbAY OF ~ 2004.
liQ1E;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECTION n. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
lHlS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD,. SUITE 4. FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722. FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: .J>lW CHECKED BY; J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-100' I REV: 10/20/04
15' UnLlTY EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1/4 OF SEe 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWO No:SEC11T-AE(P7)ISHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Page....1!Lof I ~o
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 86 of 236
PROJECT 70 ~9;J..1
PARCEl 'i If ~ f7..
fOlIO ()O <-/ 107 (p 000 't
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 AND THE NW 1/4 Of THE SW 1/4 OF
SECTION 11, TWP 50 S. RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA
NORTH UNE SECTION 11
N8817'44"E
I'
1178.60'
P.O.C.
NW CORNER OF
SECTION 11
NORlli UNE Of lliE S 1/2 OF
THE S 1/2 Of THE SW 1/4 OF
THf; NW 1/4
P.O.B. (1)
P.0.B.(2)
...,.
,
~
I/)
0 w
al j!:...,.
,... ~';::-
co ~
ori ""~
170' co ZZ
ID ::Jw
t-~
F.P.&L. R/W I/)
-CIA..
w wo
~ EASEMENT
...,.
bt
~
8
%
N8910'18"W ~
155,00'
...,.
';::-
~
Z
~ W
. ~...,.
N ....'
...,.
bt o~
~ w~
~ ZV!
:Jw
...j!:
VI
~~
S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
m:
F.P.&:L-FlORIOA POWER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF CO......ENCE...ENT
,.,
.
~
Ol
PROPOSED /g
UTILITY
EASEMENT ~
I
FOUO NO.:
00410760008
N 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1/4 AND THE N
1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
--~!!.~Lc/L~___
JAM N. WILKISON (FOR THE FIR'" L.B6773)
PR SSIONAl SUR~YOR AND MAPPER
flORIDA lJCENSE NO. LS 4876
lHlS ~ '>rl)AY OF ~ 2005.
SOUTH UNE OF THE N 1/2 OF
THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1/4
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
I:iOre
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CAlCULA TEO ARE e....SED ON A FIELD SURVEY Of
SECTION 11. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, flA. E....ST ZONE, '83/,90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COlONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORr MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 n4AlL.: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ",",W CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCR/PnON: DATE' 8/3/04 SCAlE: 1"-100' REV: 3/16/05
AN ACCESS EASE"'ENT IN lliE NW 1/4 '
AND THE SW 1/4 Of SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEClIT-AE(AE5) SHEET: 1 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
Page.Jre.. of J e;O
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 87 of 236
PROJECT 70 'lS'q ;L /
PARCEl ~ 4 5'" R
FOLIO _00,/ /07(... 000 ~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 AND TI-IE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
SECTION 1 t, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION OF LANDS LYING IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, AND, THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST
1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4. AND, THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE
26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
(1)COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11. TI-IENCE RUN
N88'17'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,178.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE RUN SOO"49'42"W, A DISTANCE Of 2401.42 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS
PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NB7'54'59"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.20 FEET ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4;
THENCE RUN SOO'49' 42"W, A DISTANCE OF 685.88 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE;
THENCE RUN SB9'10'lS"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN NOQ'49'42"E, A DISTANCE
OF 678,01 FEET ALONG A LINE mAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
AND,
(2)COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11. THENCE RUN
NS8'17'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 1.178;60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 3094.43 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS
PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND THE
EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF mE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE RUN N89'10'18"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET; THENCE RUN
SOO"49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 670.77 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN S87'42.'01"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.23 FEET
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN NOO"49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 679.24 FEET
ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 210.328 SQUARE FEET OR 4.82 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
FOR SKETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, Fl..ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, u..c DRAWN BY: ~W CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DATE: 6/3/04 SCALE: I REV: 3/16/05
AN ACCESS EASEl.tENT IN mE NW 1/4
AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No; 020901 DWG No:SEC1tT-AE(^E5) ISHEET: 2 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
page-.f.L of I ~(./
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 88 of 236
PROJECT 7 Ot.l<t:1 ;t./
PARCEL ~ tI!J R
FOLIO 0 (,) l..( I ()7 '000 ~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION,
OF A UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 AND THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
SECTION 11, TYtP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA
NORTH UNE SECTION 11
P.O.C.
NW CORNER OF
SECTION 11
NB817'''''''"E I 1163.59'
NORTH UNE 01' THE S 1/2 01'
THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
THE NW 1/4
P.O.B.
N87'54'59"E
'5,02'
170'
...
,
~
rn
""
;;...,.
15~
l&J~
%z
::::Iw
t-j!:
rn
~15
S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
~
....
t"-
::?
6
d
.....
co
F,P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
KE:i:
F.P.&:L-FlORIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RlGHT-OI'-WAY
P.O. B.-POINT 01' BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
~
.
<'I
...
;"
~
I/)
FOLIO NO,:
00410760006
IS'
~
589'10"6"[
155.00'
~ ~
N. ~
.... 8 :I:
::..; z
S2~w
ii'I i!:...
~~
w~
z
::::Iw
I-j!:
I/)
"J~
N 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1/4 AND THE N
1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
w
.
N
...,.
~
8
z
N8910 18 W
~ 155.00'
a;
t"-
co
15.07'
587'42'01"'W
,
N
....
~
~
SOUlli UNE OF THE N 1/2 OF
THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF
THE SW 1/4
SEE SHEET 2 01' 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
--~- --__d-~___
JAME . 1'4lJ(ISON (FOR THE nRM LB677J)
PR S10NAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORIOA UCENSE NO. LS 4878
llilS lli1>A Y OF ~ 2005,
tI.QlE;
'THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A nElD SUR\>Ff OF
SECnON 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE. '83;"90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COlONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAll.; SURVE'r1NGCCOONER.COM
ClIENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, llC DRAVlfII BY: ~W CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL OESCRIPl1ON: DATE' 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 3/'6/05
UnuTY EASEJ.lENT IN THE NW 1/4 '
AND THE SW '/4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC11T-AE(P5 SHEET: 1 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
page~of ,e;-C:>
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 89 of 236
PROJECT 7o~'i ~/
PARCH 9 'T ~ R.
FOLIO OOI..{(07/,ooo'6
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 AND THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
SEC1l0N 11, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION OF A 15-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUlH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH
1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, AND, THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, AND, THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF
THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, THENCE RUN
N88'17'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,163.59 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 2401.51 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS
PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN N87'54'59"E, A DISTANCE OF 15,02 FEET ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 678.01 FEET ALONG A LINE
THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF
THE SOUTliWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
1/4; THENCE RUN S89'10'18"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTl-l
LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 15,00 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST
1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN N89'10'18"W, A DISTANCE OF 155,00 FEET;
THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 679.24 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS
PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN S87'42'01"W, A DISTANCE OF 15,02 FEET
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST
1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 1372.30 FEET
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF A 170-FOOT FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT, SAID LINE RUNNING PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINES OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ' ,
CONTAINING 22,909 SQUARE FEET OR 0.53 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SEE SHEET 1 Of 2
FOR S1<ETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVE'r1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MVERS, R.ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, u.c DRAWN BY; ~w CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/04 SCAlE: IREV: 3/16/05
UTtUTY EASEMENT IN mE NW 1/4
AND lliE SW 1/4 Of SEe 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SECltT-AE(P5)ISHEET: 2 Of' 2
EXHIBIT A
Page-il of I.e;-D
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Pagli lWpf 236
PROJECT 10'6'1 :< I
PARCEL 7 L./ f.t. I?
FOLIO oo'-t II c:; 0000 h
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 6
IN THE NE 1/4 AND THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 $,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
P.O.C.
NW CORNER
OF TliE NE 1/4
OF THE SW 1/4
P.O,B. SS910'fS"E
1" '8 70.00'
~
~ ~ NS9"fO'TS"W
~ 40.00'
NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOUD NO.:
00411800006
DESCRIPTION;
PROPOSED ~~ ~
UTILITY 15 ~
EASEMENT ~ ~
~ ~~
~ zit..
" :Jo
II:: t- 'Of"
;ij ~~
e: ItJ
z
PROPOSED PRODUCTION WELL
NO. 6 UTILITY EASEMENT
58910'18"E
40.00'
~
N'
....,. g
~g
8-
I/)
w
~8
~o
8<0
Z
~
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
FP&:L - F1..ORIDA POWER
AND UGHT COMPANY
P.O.B. - POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
N8910'IS"W
70.00'
A PARcEL LYING IN THE NQRlliEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlli, RANGE 26
EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA: . ,
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF lliE SOUlliWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN
SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 290,47 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAlO NORlliEAST 1/4 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE RUN S8910'18"E, A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W. A
OISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET AlONG A UNE THAT IS PARAllEL TO SAID WEST UNE: THENCE RUN N8910'18"W, A
DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET TO SAID WEST LINE; THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET AlONG SAID
WEST LINE; THENCE RUN S8910'lS"E, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; lliENCE RUN NOO'49'34"E, A DISTANCE OF 60.00
FEET ALONG A UNE PARALLEL TO SAID WEST UNE; THENCE RUN N8910'18"W, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO SAID
WEST UNE; THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E. A DISTANCE Of JO.OO FEET ALONG SAID Ytt:ST UNE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 8,100 SQUARE FEET OR 0.19 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
tfQIE.;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE eASED ON A FlElO SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDfNAlE SYSlEM, f1.A. EAST ZONE, '83/"90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COlONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX; (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY; JRf CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEl DESCRIPTION: WElL NO.6 DATE: 8/26/04 SCALE: 1 "-SO' REV: 10/26/04
TEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT LYING IN
THE NE 1/4 Of' tHE SW 1/4 Of SECTION 11 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG NO:sECl1W-TCE(TC8 SHEET: 1 OF 1
~~------
. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB6773)
PROF SIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.OR QA J.JCENSE N~76
THIS U- r-rJA Y OF 005.
EXHIBIT A
P.g.....1:L of I ~o
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 91 of 236
PROJECT Jt> €C, :1./
PARCEl 9 'i(P R
FOLIO C>o411 ~~O~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 6
IN THE NE 1/4 AND THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
P,O,C.
NW CORNER
OF THE NE '14
OF THE SW 1/4
j,
t J
-~
~>~~
~ ~ ~~
.... ~ is 8'"
:: ~ p.o.B.II
....i= w
~15 ~
In, ;
~~ Il:
z
J..
S89"10'18"E
40.00'
8
d
10
--
PROPOSED 15'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
--
~
.
....
:t8
'" .
ig
KE:t.:
R/W - RIGHT-or-WAY
fP&:L - f1.0RIDA POWER
AND UGHT COMPANY
P.O.B. - POINT or BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT OF COI.tMENCEMENT
~
0.
;>t
8
z
NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00411800006
/
N89'1D'18"W
40.00'
DESCRIPTION:
A PARCEL LYING IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF lHE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT HORlliWEsT CORNER or SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W,
A DtSTANCE Of 320.47 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE or SAID NORTHEAST '14 or THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN S89"10'18"E, A DISTANCE OF 40,00 FEET: THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE
Of 60,00 F'EET ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARAlLEL TO SAID WEST UNE; THENCE RUN N89'10'18"W, A DISTANCE OF'
40.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET ALONG SAID WEST UNE TO lliE POINT OF
BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 2,400 SQUARE FEET OR 0.06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~~E- N~ .;;-~~~~-;;~ LB6773)
PR SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FL ID..... lJCENSE NO"j..S 4876
llilS ./..:LMDAY OF' ~OO5. THIS 'S NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4. FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER,COM
ClIENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, llC DRAWN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARca DESCRIPTION: WEll NO, 6 DATE: 8/26/04 SCALE: 1"-20' REV: 3/15/05
PRODUCTION WEll UTIUTY EASEt.tENT IN THE
HE 1/4 AND THE SW l!4 or SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: SEClIW-TCE(P8) SHEET: 1 OF 1
tiQlf;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A RElO SURVEY or
SECTION 11. BASIS or BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA, EAST ZONE. '83(90.
EXHIBIT A
Page~ of -.1 &)0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 92 of 236
PROJECT 70 €''i ?:.L.
PARCEl '75'1- q .
fOlIO 60 '1/1 If </000 0
..---
-'- - --
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, lWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORlli lIN~ECTION 11 7
N8817'44"Ev^
1178.60'
P.O.C. N 1/2 OF
NW CORNER OF NORTH LINE OF lliE
SECTION 11 'r-mE S 1/2 OF THE SW '/4 OF
~ lliE NW '14
~
~~
;.< ~ ~
N ~ N87'58'14"E
~ 155.19'
I~P.O.B.
.
J'
fJ
1.
ILJ
l!l~
.(7)
~~
z
~...,.
<'I'
,~
-~
z
WW
j!:j!:"f'
~ LL~'
~ 0 -
a;:t' WN~
N lJJ Z'Z
...:t" ::J~w
.., ~ ..... V> j!:
liS l/)ILJ
~j!=~
'-.J
N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOUO NO.: U1
00411440000 I
~: ~t~
F.P.&:L-f1.0RIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO. 15 ~ l!I
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY a:..... <(
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING a. ::J w
P.o.C.-POINT OF """MENC<l.lENT Y
r SOUlli LINE OF lliE N 1/2 OF
THE S 1/2 OF lliE SW 1/4 OF I
THE NW 1/4
--170'
I F.P.&:L. R/W
EASEMENT
DESCRll"TIQt.j OF A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUlli 1/2 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE
NORTHM::ST 1/4 OF SECTION 11. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA:
C()I,fIdENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, lliENCE RUN N6817'''"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,178.60
FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE Of 2058.36 FEET ALONG A
LINE THAT RUNS PARAUEL TO THE EAST UNE OF lliE WEST '12 Of lliE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; lliENCE RUN N87'58'14"E, A DISTANCE Of 155.19 FEET ALONG lliE NORlli LINE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF
lliE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF
342.91 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUlli 1/2 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF lliE
NORTHWEST 1/2: THENCE RUN 587'54'59"W, A OISTANCE Of 155.20 FEET ALONG THE SOUlli LINE OF SAID NORTH
1/2 Of THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE NORTHWEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE
OF" 343.06 FEET ALONG A LINE RUNNING PARALl.EL TO SAID EAST LINE, AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 53.163 SQUARE FEET OR 1.22 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
155.20'
587'54'59 W
~~~-(;;;m~;;~ ""'m)
PR~:i~AL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.0R!DA YCENSE N.Q. ~ 4876
THIS ~ DAY OF Y.1..C- 2004.
~
lliE PARCEl BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CAlCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINA TE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/'90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVE't1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE'r1NGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: .J.IW CHECKED BY; J.N.W.
PARCEL OESCR'PTlON: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 10/20/0
AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4 OF
THE NW 174 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC11T-AE(AE4) SHEET: 1 OF I
EXHIBIT ;l
page~of I&;"O
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
PROJECT ~9~ 'RJf/
PARCEL q l.../ 9
FOLIO 00 If 114 If C)t)()O
-,- - - - . ^ '16".59'
1\ N8817'44"E V '"
. '--P.O.C.
NW CORNER O'CF NORW LINE OF WE N 1/2 OF
SECTION 11 THE S 1/2 OF lliE SW 1/4 OF
lliE NW 1/4
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECllON 11. 1WP 50 S.
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY. FLORIDA
NORlli UNE SECTION 11 7
~
<'I'
:t~.
~cd >-
b8
lil<'l
t~
~~
j.
P,O.B.
170'
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
'lC
.
N
...,.
~ ~...,.
~ ~:::-
;~
w...,
j!:;!:...,.
~~::-
...,N3I:
z'z
::J-""
I-l/)j!:
~~~
'--J
~
f\ N87'5B'14"(
1'-.;.," 15.02'
N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOUO NO.:
00411440000
t"
:to
Gl .
~~
::lI:
.~
8:1
~~
KO:
F.P.&:L-FlORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
p.o.a,-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C,-POlNT OF COMMENCEMENT
('SOUlli LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF
THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
WE NW 1/4 15.02' "~
S87'54'59"W
DESCRIPTION OF A 15-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN THE NORlli 1/2 OF 1l1E SOUlli 1/2 OF lliE SOU11iWEST 1/4
OF THE'NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION U, TOWNSHIP 50 SOU11i, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COI.tMENClNG AT 11iE NORlliWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION ll, THENCE RUN N8817'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,163.59
FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; lliENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 2058.44 FEET ALONG A
UNE llV.T RUNS PARALLEL TO lliE EAST UNE OF lliE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORlliWEST 1/4 TO WE POINT OF
BEGINNING: THENCE RUN N87"58'14"E, A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET ALONG THE NORllI LINE OF SAID NORTH l/2 OF
lliE SOUlli 1/2 OF lHE SOUWWEST l/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN SOD'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF
343.06 FEET ALONG A UHE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTH l/2 OF lliE SOUlli l/2 OF
lliE SOU11iWEST l/4 OF lliE NORlliWEST 1/2: llIENCE RUN S8T54'59"W. A OISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET ALONG lliE
sourn UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF THE NORlliWEST 1/4: rnENCE
RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 343.07 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF A 170-FOOT flORIDA POWER IIND LIGHT
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEl.tENT, SAIO LINE RUNNING PARAU.EL TO SAID EIIST LINE. IINO TO WE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 5,146 SQlJARE FEET OR 0.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~- ~-
---- -- -----------
JAM N, WIlKISON (FOR WE FIRM LB6773)
PR SSlQNAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.ORIOA UCENSE N~~ ,4876
THIS ~ ~A Y Of 2004.
tiQIE;
THE PARCEl BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 1'- BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COOROIN,6.TE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPll0N: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-l00')REV: 10/20/04
15' UTlUTY EASEMENT IN THE SW 1/4
OF 'tHE NW 1/4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC11T-AE(P4)ISHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
page...!i.1. of /'if:O
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 94 of 236
PROJECT 70"6 lj ;Z I
PARCEL ~~C)_
FOLIO Do '-/ 107 b o~ 2-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COlUER COUNlY. FLORIDA
NORTH UNE SECTION 11 7
N88i 7' 44"EI'
1178.60'
P.O.C.
NW CORNER OF
SECllON 11
NORlli LINE Of lliE S 1/2 Of'
THE N 1/2 OF lllE SW 1/4 OF
lliE NW 1/4
-]- ~
0<'1
1')"'"
".;a.
~...,.
1'-'
~~
N88'Ol'29"E
155.19'
P.O.B.
-170'
F.P.&:L. R/W
EASEMENT
;,:
en..,.
w::::'
i=~
. ~ l5~
Iii....,. lLIz~
N$
;1; ~ ~~
~~
w~
'-J
S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4-
FOUO NO,:
00410960002
w
8~
....
~~
z
~:
F.P.&:L-f1.ORIOA POWER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
155,111'
587'58 14 W
DESCRIPllQt:j OF A PARCEL OF LAND L'YlNG IN lliE SOUTH 1/2 OF lliE NORlll 1/2 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE
N~THYlEST 1/4 Of' SEClION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlti, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA:
COI.tt.lENClNG AT lHE NORltiWEST CORNER OF" SAID SECTION 11, 'THENCE RUN N88'l7'''''''"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,178.60
FEET AlONG lliE NORlli LINE OF SAID SECllON; lHENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 1715,30 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARALlEL TO THE EAST UNE OF lliE NORlliWEST 1/4 TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE RUN
N88'OI'29"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.19 FEET ALONG THE NORlH UNE OF SAID SOUlli 1/2 OF lliE NORlll 1/2 OF mE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF" 342.91 FEET ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID SOUlli 1/2 OF THE NORm 1/2 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of lliE NORlliWEST 1/4: lliENCE RUN
587'58'14 "W, A DI5T ANCE OF 155.19 FEET ALONG lllF; SOUTH UNE OF SAID SCUlli 1/2 Of' THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"[, A DISTANCE Of 343.06 FEET AlONG THE WEST
UNE OF A 170-FOOT flORIDA PO~ AND UGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID UNE RUNNING PARAlLEL TO SAID
EAST UNE, AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 53,163 SQUARE FEET OR 1.22 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~ r:iQI[;
~~ THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FlElD SURVEY OF
~~E- '~~ON (;~-;;;E-;";~ LB6773) SECTION 11. BASIS Of BEARING: STAlE PLANE
PR SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER COORDINAlE SYSTEM, f1.A. EAST ZONE, '83/"90.
~?:I~~),It~~NO'O~~~~4, THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOctA TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COlONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX; (239)277-7179 EMAIL.: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J,N.W,
PARCEL DESCRlPnON: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: '"-100' REV: 10/20/04
AN ACCESS EASSlENT IN THE SW 1/4 Of
lHE NW 1 4 Of SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC11T-AE{AEJ) SHEET; 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT Ii
page~of f~O
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 95 of 236
PROJECT 7offe; .zl
PARCEl l' 60
FOLIO 0 Ot..( t" q ~ooO 2-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF' SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORlli UNE SECnON 11 7
N8817'44"E I' "63,59'
t~
~W
-- - --
:t:
.
~~~ ~~
NW CORNER OF C NORTH UNE OF nlE S 1/2 OF ~ :::i ,.
SECTION 11 THE N l/2 OF lliE SW 1/4 OF 8!::
THE NW 1/4 CII
P.O.B.}
....
j.
I'- N?H:gF9"E
S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOUO NO,:
00410960002
170'
F.P,&L. R/W
EASEMENT
., ~...,.
N <'I'
...,. ,-
~ ~~
b CII
!}l wW
;!:i5...,.
~~~
w<'l:t:
z~z
:J w
t-Zj;
CIIW
l5~~
"'.J
W:
F.P.&:L-Fl.ORIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT Of CO"'MENCE"'ENT
{::" .,
....,.0 8~
~ ~ ~~
z ~
(SOUTH UNE OF THE S 1/2 OF
THE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
THE NW l/4 15,02' .~
S87"158'14"W
DESCRIPTION OF A 15-FOOT SlRlP OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUlli 1/2 OF' lliE NORlli 1/2 Of THE SOUlllWEST 1/4
OF THI!:'NORlliWEST '14 OF SECTION H, TOWNSHIP 50 SOU lli , RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, f1.ORIDA:
COM...ENClNG AT THE NORlliWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, THENCE RUN N8817'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,163.59
FEET AlONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; lliENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE Of 1785.37 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT RUNS PARAlLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF THE NORlliWEST l/4 TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN
N88'Ol'29"E, A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET AlONG THE NORlH UNE OF SAID SOUlll 1/2 OF THE NORnI 1/2 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A OlSTANCE OF 343.06 FEET ALONG A LINE
THAT RUNS PARAlLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE
NORnlWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN S87"58'14"W, A DISTANCE Of 15.02 FEET ALONG lliE SOUlli UNE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2
Of THE NORTH 1/2 Of THE SOUnlWEST 1/4 OF lliE NORlliWEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF
343.07 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE OF A 170-FOOT f1.ORIDA POWER AND UGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEl.tENT, SAID
UNE RUNNING PARAlLEL TO SAID EAST UNE, AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 5.148 SQUARE FEET OR 0.12 ACRES, "'ORE OR LESS.
J;is ;~~~ LB677J)
PRO SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND "'APPER
Fl IRIJ>A UCENSE NO. LS 4876
THIS'~AY OF ~OO4. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MA?PING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4. FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL.: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, u.c DRAWN BY: "'W CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DATE: 8/3/04 SCALE: 1"-100' tREV: 10/20/04
15' UTIUTY EASEMENT IN THE SW '14
or THE NW ii. Of SEe 11 50 26 PROJECT .No: 020901 OWG No:SEC11T-AE(P3)tSHEET: 1 Of 1
I:iQIE;
THE PARca BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELO SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTE.... FLA. EAST lONE. '63/'90.
EXHIBIT A
page~ of I t:;'O
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 96 of 236
PROJECT J O~C? :2../
PARCEL ~~I R
FOLIO 0"'1 {( fp L./ otP~ 'I
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 Of THE NW 1/4 OF SECllON 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH UNE SECTION 11
N8817'60"E1
1178.60'
--0~
<0<'1
<'I"'"
"":0.
~b
-0
II)
P.O.C.
NW CORNER OF
SECTION 11
P.O.B.
o
01
,..,:
..,
~...,.
,
~~
~~
:z:1I)
lIJlIJ
~j!:...,.
~l!;:::-
....<'I~
z:::-z
::J w
.....ZjE
VlW
~j!:~
NORTH LINE OF lliE N 1/2 OF
THE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
THE NW 1/4
N '04
155.18'
N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
~: 00411640004
F.P.&:L-FLORIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P,O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O. C.-POINT OF CO......ENCE...ENT
SOUlli LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF
( THE N 1/2 Of lHE SW 1/4 OF
~ lliE NW 1/4
Cll:>-I
~:i.3
OF:::;
a..::>w
~eJin ~
a..~lLJ
w
l~
8
z
~
~
~
F.P.&l. R/W ill
EASEMENT
170'
S88'01'29"W
155.19
DESC~IPTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTH ~ OF THE NORlli ~ OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 E;AST, COWER COUNTY, f1.0RIDA:
CO......ENONG AT THE NORlliWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, lliENCE RUN N6617'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 1.178.55
FEET ALONG THE NORlli LINE Of SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN SOO'49'34"W, A DISTANCE OF 1387.26 FEET ALONG A
LINE lliAT RUNS PARALU:L TO lliE EAST UNE Of SAID NORTH ~ OF THE NORTH Ii OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE
NORlliWEST " TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; lliENCE RUN N66"04'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.16 FEET AlONG THE A
LINE lliAT IS PARALl..EL TO lliE NORlli LINE Of SAID NORlli 1/2 OF lliE NORTH 1/2 OF lliE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF
THE NORTHWEST 1/4; ll-lENCE RUN SOO'49'34"W, A DISTANCE OF 327,90 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE TO lHE SOUTH
UNE OF SAID NORTH ~ OF lHE NORTH )i OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE NORlliWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
S68'OI'29"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.19 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE; lliENCE RUN NOO'49'3.."E, A DISTANCE OF
326.04 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALU:L TO SAID EAST LINE TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 50,835 SQUARE FEET OR 1.17 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~ /.. / lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
----- ~-d~ :::~LATED ARE BASED ON A FJELD SURVEY OF
JA"'ES . WILKISON <FOR THE FJR... LB6773) SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE, PlANE
PRO ONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER COORDlNA TE SYSTEM, FtA. EAST ZONE, 83/"90.
flORIDA UCENSE N~ 4876 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY SEE SHEET 2 Of 2
llilS LL."T""rJAY OF - 2005. FOR DESCRIPTION
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYlERS, Fl.ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAfL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
ClIENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: .....W CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/3/0" SCAlL: 1"-100' REV: 3/14/05
AN ACCESS EASEl.tENT IN lliE SW 1/4 OF
THE NW 1 4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC11T-AE(AE2) SHEET: 1 OF.'
EXHIBIT A
page~of ) r::;-o
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 97 of 236
PROJECT 701J'i J..I
PARCEl q q I 1<. _
FOLIO Dol.(" (., 400e> <f
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORlli UNE SECTION 11 7
;- -IT
. ,
<'10
""'1')
o,N
~f;;
0-
If)
N8817'44"E -I
1l63.59'
P.O.C.
NW CORNER OF
SECTION 1l _ NORlli LINE OF THE N 1/2
OF THE N 1/2 OF SW 1/4
OF lliE NW 1/4
<'I
...,.
'"
;ot
8
If)
N88'04'44"E
170.20'
P.O.B.
~
155.18
S88'04'''''''.W,"
N
i:'S
~~
I/)
l<.
0....
<'1;:-
~~
z
WW
j!:iE...,.
\5g;:::-
w"'~
z:::-z
::J It.I
lii~iE
~iE~
lli:
F.P.&:L-FLORlDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
W
~r-
",'=1
~~
z _ __ 170'
'" F.P.&L. R/W
~ EASEMENT
01
15.02' - b
S88'01'29"W fil
N 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00411640004
;,.
o
oi
'"
I')
SOUTH LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF
lliE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
THE NW 1/4
DESCRIPTION OF A IS-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN lliE NORlli 1/2 OF THE NORlli 1/2 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4
OF lliE NORTHWEST 1/. OF SECTION 1" TOWNSHIP 50 SCUlli, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, f1.ORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORlliWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1" lliENCE RUN NB817....E, A DISTANCE OF 1,16J.S9
FEET /-LONG lliE NORTH UNE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN SOO'411'42"W, A DISTANCE Of lJ72.30 FEET ALONG A
UNE1HAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORlliWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO lliE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE RUN N88'04'44"E, A DISTANCE Of 170.20 FEE.T ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID NORTH 1/2 OF
THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST lj4 OF lliE NORTHWEST 1/4 'to EAST UNE OF SAID NORlll 1/2 OF THE NORlli
1/2 OF THE SOUlllWEST '14 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4: THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 15.02 FEET
ALONG SAID EAST LINE; lliENCE RUN S88'04'44"W FOR A DISTANCE OF" 155.18 tEET; lliENCE RUN SOO'4Q'42"W, A
DISTANCE OF 328.04 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE; lllENCE RUN S88'OI'29"W, A
DISTANCE OF 15.02 tEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE Of SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORlll 1/2 Of lllE SOUlliWEST 1/4
OF lliE NORlliWEST 1/4: lllENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 343.07 FEET ALONG lHE WEST UNE OF A
170-FOOT flORIDA POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, SAID LINE RUNNING PARALLEl TO SAID EAST LINE,
AND TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 7,474 SQUARE FEET OR 0.l7 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
~J.w-e.
----- ----------------
JAMES . WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB677J)
PROF SlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.ORII?f..J:!CENSE NO.. r.,::; .876
llllS u:::: DAY OF L:::h.r2005,
'1iQli;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES. AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A F1RO SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINA TE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE. '63/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA TES, INC.
SURVE'I1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 e:MA'~ SURVE'I1NGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREElE:Y AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEl DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/J/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 3/14/05
15' UTILITY EASEMENT IN lliE SW 1/4
or THE NW 1 4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC11T-AE(P2) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Page.3L.. of (~{)
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 98 of 236
PROJECT 70 g-<:J 2/
PARCEl _ 7 5"';l. ~
FOl ro _004 I ore ~ @O ,-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 5
IN lHE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, flORIDA
F.P.&L. R!W
EASEMENT
Z
l!i ~
""~~
z-z
:Jlllld
I- i!:
~~~
1.1 S89, 18 E
~ 60.00'
~8
gg 8
d
co
- PROPOSED - /
15' UTILITY ~
E^SEMENT P.O.B.
KEY:
F.P.&:L-f1.ORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT OF COI.tMENCEl.tENT
. R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
ld
~
bt
:t'
8
z
~
~
0.
:t'
8
I/)
o
o
d
I')
100.00'
N89'O'18"W
DESCRIPTION:
A PAACEl LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlli, RANGE 26
EAST, COlUER COUNTY, flORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOlLOW:
COM...ENCING AT lliE NORlliWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN soum
00'49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET ALONG lliE M:ST LINE OF SAID SOUlliEAST 1/4 OF lliE NORlliWEST
1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; lliENCE RUN SOUTH 89'10'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE RUN
NORTH 00'49'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET AlONG A LINE lliAT IS PARAllEL Willi SAID WEST UNE;
THENCE RUN soum 89'10'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 60.00; lliENCE RUN SOUlli 00'49'42" M:ST, A DISTANCE OF
180.00 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARALLEL TO SAID WEST LINE; THENCE RUN NORTH 89'10'18" WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 100.00 F"EET TO SAID WEST UNE; THENCE RUN NORlli 00'49'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET
ALONG SAID WEST UNE TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 16,000 Sq. Ft., OR 0,37 Ac. "'ORE OR LESS.
----~---~~------
JA"'E . WILKISON (FOR THE FIR'" LB6773)
PROFE ONAl SURVEYOR AND "'APPER
f1.ORIQA,UCENSE NO. LS 4876
THIS ~DAY OF ~2005.
Will::
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTE..., FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX; (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JNM CHECKED BY: J.N,W,
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: WELl NO.5 DATE: 8/14/04 SCALE: 1"-80' EV; 3/14/05
TEMP, CONSTRUCTION EASEl.tENT IN THE
SE 1 .. OF THE: NW 1 .. OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SECl1W-TCE(TCS SHEET; 1 OF 1
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 99 of 236
EXHIBIT A
page~ of I !It)
PROJECT 7 0 ~ c; ;L I ..
PARCEl 95';1.. R
FOLIO CX>l.( I ObL(OoO~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 5
IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNlY, FLORIDA
P.O.B,
NW CORNER OF
THE SE 1/4 Of
THE NW 1/4
KEY:
F.P.&:L-FlORIOA POWER &: UGHT CO.
P .O,B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT OF COMMENCEl.tENT
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
"'-
",-0
O'<l-..f-
w"'-"'-
Z~~
::Jw::
I-V>Z
V>ww
~rEiE
8 40,00
58910'18"E 8
g g
IlJ WELL SITE
. NO.5
~
0.
:t
~
FOUO NO.:
00410640005
PROPOSED
15' UTlUTY
EASEMENT
F.P,&L. R/W
EASEMENT
DESCRIPTION'
A pARCEL LYING IN THE. SOUTHEAST '14 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION II, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlH, RANGE 26
EAST, COWER COUNTY, f1.0RIOA, DESCRIBED AS FOllOW:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUlliEA5T 1/4 OF lHE NORlHWEST 1/4; lliENCE RUN SOUTH
8910'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET: THENCE RUN SOUlH 00'49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 F1::ET
ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARAllEL WITH lHF.: WEST UNE OF SAID SOUlliEAST 1/4 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4: THENCE
RUN NORTH 8910'18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 F1::ET TO SAID WEST UNE: lliENCE RUN NORTH 00'49'42" EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET ALONG SAID WEST UNE. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2.000 SQ. FT., OR 0.05 AC. MORE OR LESS.
JAME~';~"~-;'''~ LB6713)
PRiiiJi:~}f SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.0RIDA);l<?,ENSE NQ.. LS 4876
lHlS t:t:t:-uAY OF n-V--Z005,
l:l.lllE:
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STAlE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, f1.A. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, u.c DRAYtN BY: .lNM CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: WEU. NO,S DATE: 8/14/04 SCAlE: 1"-30' REV: 3/14/05
PRODUCTION WELL unuTY EASEMENT IN TH
SE 1/4 OF lHE NW 1 4 OF SEC U-50-Z8 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: SECllW-TCE(P~) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Page~of l"i"O
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 100 of 236
PROJECT 7o<3Cf ~ /
PARCEL '15 5""'3
FOLIO 00 t...j lOr... 'i?~ 7
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
N8617'44"E
1178.60'
NORlli UNE SECTION 11
155.15'
P.O.B.(I)
"-.P.o.c.
NW CORNER OF
SECTION 11
I ~
o
00
~
NE CORNER OF
ll-iE NW '/4 OF
THE NW 1/4
NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 0 I-
UJ Z lD
~~~ ~ ~
~::JlX g;~
g:~~ ~
8
~z
P.O.B.(2) ~
in
~
FOUO NO.:
00410680007
~170'
F.P.&:L. R/W
EASEl.tENT
~
~
0.
;t-
o
~
~
w:z
i!'w
l5~
w~
Z...,.
::J,
I-~
l/)~
i5:z
N8910"S"W
155.00'
w
. ~
B...
mm
2~
z
;,.
"!
r:::
o
155.00
58910'18"E
SOUlli LINE Of mE NW 1/4 OF THE NW l/4
W:
F.P.&:L-f1.ORIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COI.tMENCEMENT
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
;;;;;-~~~~~-;'R;; LB.m)
PR!~~~AL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
~I~~~S~ ~~4. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVE'YING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUllE -4, FORT MYERS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 F'AX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL.:SURVE.\1NGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRJPllON: DATE: 7/3'/04 SCALE: 1".100' REV: 10/20/04
AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE NW 1/4
Of THE NW 1 4 Of SEe " 50 28 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC11T-AE(AE1) SHEET: 1 OF 2
I::lQIE;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINA TE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/,90.
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 101 of 236
EXHIBIT ...A.-
Page-2Lof /&;()
PROJECT 7 0 ~q ;:t I
PARCEL "'i ~3
F Ol r 0 00'1/0 '" <;?~ '7
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECllON 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST
1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
(1)COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION ", THENCE RUN
N8B'17'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,178.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE N8B'17'44"E ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE
OF 155.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST
1/4; THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 285.01 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 (ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF A
170-FOOT FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT); THENCE RUN
N89'lO'18"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NOO"49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF
278.16 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING,
AND,
(2)COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, THENCE RUN
N88'17'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,178.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 293.16 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS
PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN 589'10'18"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET TO SAID
EAST LINE; THENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 1,071.64 FEET ALONG SAID EAST
LINE (ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF A 170-FOOT FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT); THENCE RUN S88'04'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.18 FEET ALONG
THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE, ~ORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN
NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,079.08 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID
EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 210,327 SQUARE FEET OR 4.83 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SEE SHEET 1 Of 2
FOR SKETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVE'tlNG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BL W., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGGCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DAlE: 7/31/04 SCALE: N'A. REV; 10/7/04
AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE NW 1/4
OF THE NW 1/4 Of SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: SEC11T-AE(AE1) SHEET; 2 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
Page q~ of 1t)0
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 102 of 236
PROJECT 70'(,'7 ~
PARCEL 9' S- .3
FOLIO oot./ (Oh~Ooo 7
-I- - - -
~P.O.C.
NW CORNER OF
SECTION '11
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, lWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY. FLORIDA
NORlli LINt SECTION 11 7
- - f'
J t'---15.01'
P,O.B.
N8817'44"E .j
1163.59'
NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
io
lid
'"
N
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
170'
t~
~~
I.
FOLIO NO.:
00410680007
g
r-l
'"
:2
~
~
~
~
KEY:
F.P.&:L-FLORIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O,8.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF CO......ENCEMENT
""
.
<'I
..,.
0,
b ..." ~ 10 ~
o 0""
z .,;0,
"'...,.
o'
15,02' ~ ~ ~
S89J9'l~;E
15:>,uu'
~
z....
.....::::-
, , j!:~
8 ~LLZ
T ~ ~~
\ ~ ~15
Ill...,.
-c,
.....~
"J
;>
T55.~
N891018"W
c
S88'O-4'''''''.W
SCUlli LINE OF lliE NW 1/4 OF lliE NW 1/4
DESCRIPTION OF A 15-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN THE NORlliWEST 1/4 OF THE NORlliWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlli, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
CO......ENClNG AT THE NORlliWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, ffiENCE RUN N8S17'4-4"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,163.59
FEET ALONG lliE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING; lliENCE CONTINUE N8S'17'44-E ALONG
SAID UNE, A DISTANCE OF 15.01 FEET; lliENCE RUN SOO'49'42.W, A DISTANCE Of 278,16 FEET ALONG A LINE lliAT
RUNS PARAllEL TO lliE EAST LINE OF SAiD NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN S8910'18"E, A
DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE; lliENCE RUN SOO'49'42.W, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET ALONG SAID
EAST LINE; lliENCE RUN N89'lO'1S"W. A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET; lliENCE RUN SOO'49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF
1,079.08 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEl TO SAID EAST LINE; lliENCE RUN 588'04'''''''.W, A DISTANCE OF
15.02 FEET AlONG lliE SOUTH UNE OF SAID NORlliWEST 1/'" OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE RUN NOO....9.42.E, A
DISTANCE Of 1,372.30 !'"EET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF A 170-FOOT FLORIDA POI'fER AND LIGHT COI.tPANY
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEl.tENT, SAID LINE RUNNING PARALLEL TO SAiD EAST UNE AND TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAiNING 22,909 SQUARE FEET OR 0.53 ACRES, "'ORE OR LESS.
--~~J__J,,-~
JA N. WILKISON (fOR lliE FIRM LB6773)
PR SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORIOA LICENSE N.Q.. l"S 4876
THIS Z!l!!..'> DA Y OF ~ 2004.
l:lQIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORD1NATt SYSTE"', f1.A. EAST ZONE, '83/"90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES, INC.
SURVEYING. AND MAPPING
3900 COlONiAl BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAll: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JNW CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 7/3'10'" SCAlE: 1"-100' I REV: 10/20/04
15' UllUTY EASEMENT IN THE NW 1/4
OF THe: NW 1). OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWO No:SECllT-AE(Pl;tSHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
~iQ'...2..E.. of J ~ 0
Agenda Item No.1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 103 of 236
PROJECT 70Cic;:2 I
PARCEL q 5"".3 A ^'
FOLIO 00 I.f I ()~ 1./000 c;
SBTCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
P.O.C.
NE CORNER OF
THE NE 1/-4 OF
THE NW 1/4
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
PROPOSED
PRODUCTION
WELL NO. 4
EASEMENT
S89"10'18"E
15,00'
P.O.B.
W LINE OF THE
NE 1/4 OF
THE NW 1/4
~
il
~
s
~
NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
ID:
F.P.&L-f1.0RlDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.S.-POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O,C.-POlNT OF COMMENCEMENT
PROPOSED 15'
UTILITY EASEMEN~ ~
~
;"
:t'
8
::t:
~
~
~
~
FOLIO NO.;
00410840009
N89"10'18"W
15.00'
DFSCRIPTION OF A IS-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN THE NORlliEAST 'I'" OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, FlORIDA:',
C()I,AMENCNG AT THE NORlliWEST CORNER Of SAID NORTHEAST 1/-4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN
SOO"49'42"W, A DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET AlONG THE Yt\::ST UNE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORlliWEST 1/4
TO THE POINT Of' BEGINNING; THENCE RUN S89"10'18"E, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET: THENCE RUN SOO"49'42"W, A
DISTANCE OF' 180.02 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARAlLEL TO SAID Y1t:ST UNE: THENCE RUN N89"10'18"W. A
DISTANCE OF' 15.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NOO'49'42"E, A DISTANCE OF 180.02 FEET TO lliE POINT Of BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2,700 SQUARE FEET OR 0.06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~-----~~ .
-- -----------------
JAM N. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB677J)
PRO SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORID~ U,CENSE N~ 4876
THIS 1.- ~A Y Of 2005.
W1.IE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AHD AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF' BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM. flA, EAST ZONE, '83/'90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TESt INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUllE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
ClIENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAYM BY: ~F CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DAlE: 3/Xl/0-4 SCALE: 1"-100' REV:
15' unuTY EASEMENT IN THE NE 1/4
OF' THE NW 1 4 OF SEe 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: SEC11T-AE(P12) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Page..!i1.... of / ~(.;1
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 104 of 236
PROJECT 7 t?~q ;L (
PARCEL 7 ~4 R
FOLIO _ 004/ OC{'tooo 9
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 4
IN mE NE 1/4 OF ll-IE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TWP 50 $,
RGE 26 E, COllIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH LINE OF SECTION 11
---- ~
P.O.C.
NW CORNER OF
THE NE 1/4 OF
THE NW 1/4 <
~
,
8 _~
fii~
o
o
1/1
1.1.
1.1.0
Ovv
w"-"-
z~~
::Jw~
I-zz
Vlww
~~~
,w P.O.a.
~
...
-:t'
8
z
SB9l0"8"E
100.00'
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
o
o
fii NB9'O'IB"W
40.00
15'" >-
O=ol::~
gZ2\~
8::::>(n
g;~ ~
w
,
<'I
. ...,.
8...
....,.
o.
coo
o
z
8
~
NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00410840009
ID:
F.P.&:L.-FlORIOA PO~R &: LIGHT CO.
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT Or CO......ENCEMENT
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
25.00'
SB910'18"E
-
~
<'I
~8
~o
8<>>
z
I--
3:
N
...,.
...
-:t'
~.
t~
~~
J.
PROPOSED
15' UTILITY
EASEMENT __
DESCRIPTION;
At:.,nn'
NB910'18'"W
A PARCa LYING IN THE NORlliEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION II, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlli, RANGE 26
EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW:
COM"'ENClNG AT THE NORlliWEST CORNER OF SAIO NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORlliWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN SOUTH
00'49'42" ~ST, A DISTANCE Or JO.OO rEET ALONG lliE WEST LINE OF SAID NORlHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST
1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN SOUTH B910'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE RUN
SOUTH 00'49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 180.00 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARAlLEL v.1TH SAID WEST UNE;
THENCE RUN NORTH 8910'18' ~ST, A DISTANCE OF 85.00 FEET TO SAID WEST LINE; lliENCE RUN NORTH
00'49'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 90.00 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL TO lliE WEST UNE OF THE NE 1/4
OF lliE NW 1/4; THENCE RUN SOUTH 8910'IB" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; lliENCE RUN NORTH 00'49'42"
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 8910'lB" WEST, A DISTANCE Of 40.00 FEET TO SAID WEST
LINE; THENCE RUN NORlli 00'49'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET ALONG SAIO WEST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 14,250 Sq. Ft., OR 0.33 Ac. "'ORE OR LESS.
;:;;.~-~.;;ft;;;-;;;~A~~ LB'''')
PROFE~0~~RVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORI~~ YCENSE NQ. LS 4876
THIS ~DAY OF ~ 2005.
~
lliE PARca BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATID ARE BASED ON A RELO SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM. f1.A. EAST ZONE, '83/'90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA lES, INC.
SURVE'tlNG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, fORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE'tlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, u.c DRAWN BY: ..,'" CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: WELL NO.4 DATE: 8/14/04 SCALE: 1--60' (REV; 3/23/05
TEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN THE
NE 1/4 Of THE NW 1/4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 klWG NO;SEC'IW-TCE(TC4lSHEET: 1 OF 1
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 105 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Page~Of ,5"0
PROJECT 7otZQ;t I
PARCEl 9 s t.f R
FOLIO Ct::)(11 0 <6"'fOCJt:Jc;
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 4
IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECllON 11, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH LINE OF~EcnON ~.-J
U.
l&..O
O'<!"-.t-
w'--'--
z"--
:::Jw~
r-ZZ
VlWW
~ ~ ~ P.O.B.
L
~P.o.C.
8 NW CORNER OF
g THE NE 1/4 OF
THE NW 1/4
:I:
~
...,.
0,
~
8
I/) S8910'18"E
40.00
WELL SITE
NO.4
lI:
~
...,.
*
~
NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
FOLIO NO.:
00410840009
8
d
'"
F.P.&L. R/W
EASEMENT
w
.
<'I
...,.
0,
~
8
z
8
c:i
<0
L~
I~
J..
40.00'
, N8910'18"W
______- PROPOSED
.....-/ 15' UTILI TV
DESCRIPTION; EASEMENT
A PARCEL LYING IN lliE NORlliEAST 1/4 OF ruE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW: . .
COMMENCING AT ruE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THENCE RUN SOUTH
00'49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET ALONG lliE WEST LINE OF SAID NORlliEAST 1/4 OF ruE NORTHWEST
1/4 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN SOUTH 8910'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40,00 FEET; lliENCE RUN
SOUlli 00'49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET ALONG A LINE lliAT IS PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE;
TI-lENCE RUN NORTH 89'10'18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO SAID WEST UNE; THENCE RUN NORlli
00'49'420 EAST, A DISTANCE Of 60.00 FEET ALONG SAID WEST UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
KEY:
CONTAINING 2.400 Sq. Ft., OR 0.06 Ac. "'ORE OR LESS. F.P.&:L-flORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT OF COM"'ENCEMENT
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
:;:;;.~~~~~-;.~ lB'''')
PRO~~~~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.0RtDA UCENSE ~ 4676
THIS U-4..0A Y OF 2005.
tmIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTE..., F1.A. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA TESt INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SIIITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CLIENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ,lNM CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: WELL NO.4 DATE: 8/14/04 SCALE: 1"-.30' IREV: 3/23/05
PROOUCTION WElL UllUTY EASE"'ENT IN TH
NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEe 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: SEClIW-TCE(P4)ISHEET: 1 or 1
EXHIBIT A
Page q't of I~O
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 106 of 236
PROJECT 706Q 2/
PARCel 'l? S-S-
FOLIO 3;1.. 7 ~ 000:>;2..:;2.. 2-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN TRACT G.C,-2, OF FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES,
SECllON 2, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
R-300,OO'
L-l06.4S'
6-2019'49"
C-l05.89'
COB-N741l'2J"E
FOUO NO,:
32720000222
P,O.B. 12
PROPOSED 15' "-
UTlUTY EASEMENT ~
TRACT G.C.-2
PB 31, PG 94-103
KO::
C-CHORD
COB-CHORD BEARING
F.p.aL-f1.ORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
l-LENGlli
O.R. - OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK/PAGE
R-RADIUS
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
PB - PLAT BOOK
PG - PAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF CO......ENCEl.tENT
lJ. - DELTA ANGLE
170'
F.P.&:L
EASEl.tENT
~I O.R.
fl 650/974
~I w
. .
o on
o <'I
Z .
l~
:z:
N8817'44"E
lH8.56'
P.O.C.
SW CORNER
~ECTION 2
--~ ----..~L..d~
JAM N. WlLKrsON (FOR THE FIR'" LB6773)
PROFESSIONAL SURvEyOR AND MAPPER
f1.OR~~ENSE NOO~ 4876
llilS A Y Of . 2004.
P.O.B. 11
R-450.00'
L-sa.20'
11-7'24'35"
C-S8,15'
CD8-N67'43' 46"E
...
~
~
~
.
....
N
~
~
"*
ui
'"
4D
1=
on
N
~
8 SCUlli UNE OF FOREST GLEN
I/) [OF NAPLES, PB 31, PG 94-103
AND SECTION 2
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIP1l0N
tmJI:;
THE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A RELO SURVEY OF
SECTION 2. BAStS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTE.... f1.A. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A lES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGGCOONER,COM
ClIENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ~F CHECI<ED BY; J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPll0N: DATE: 8/29/04 SCALE: 1"-200' REV: 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN TRACT G.C,-Z,
FOREST GLEN Of NAPLES, OF SEC 2-50-2 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC2T-AE(AE2) SHEET: 1 OF 2
Agenda Item No.1 DC
May 10,2005
Page 107 of 236
EXHIBIT It
Page lCO of I ~O
PROJECT 7()~q ;;21
PARCEL .g5'"S-
FOLIO '3 ~ 7 ~ OOO() ,;;>...:;:L':;
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN TRACT G,C.-2, OF FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES,
SECll0N 2, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTIQN: A PARCELS OF LAND LYING TRACT G,C.-2, FOREST GlEN OF NAPLES, PLAT BOOK 31 PAGE 94-103,
AS RECORDED IN lHE PUBUC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, flORIDA, ALSO BEING IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST:
(I)COMMENClNG AT lHE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2, THENCE RUN N8617'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,178.56
FEET ALONG THE SOUlli UNE OF SAID FOREST GlEN Of NAPLES AND SAID SECTION 2 TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING;
THENCE RUN NOO'46'2S"E, A DISTANCE OF 1701.85 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO THE WEST IJN[ OF
A nO-FOOT f1.ORIDA POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN Of'FlClAL RECORDS BOOK 850,
PAGE 974, SAID PUBUC RECORDS, AS IT UES IN SAID TRACT G.C.-2; THENCE RUN S8913'J5"E, A DISTANCE Of
155.00 FEET TO lHE EAST UNE OF SAID flORIDA POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT: THENCE RUN
SOO'46'25"W, A DISTANCE OF 1695,14 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE; THENCE RUN S68H'44"W, A DISTANCE OF
155.15 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
AND,
(2)COMMENClNG AT THE SOUlliWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2, THENCE RUN N8617'.u"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,178.56
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES AND SAID SECllaN 2: THENCE RUN NOO'46'25"E, A
DISTANCE OF 1716.85 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT RUNS PARAUEL TO lliE WEST UNE OF A 170-F"OOT f1.ORIDA POWER
AND UGHT RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OFflClAL RECORDS BOOK 850. PAGE 974, SAID PUBLIC
RECORDS, AS IT UES IN SAID TRACT G.C.-2 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NOO'46'25"E, A DISTANCE
OF 378.08 FEET TO THE SOUTH UNE OF TRACT "A" (F"OREST GLEN BOULEVARD) AND A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT
CURVE TO THE LEFT, Of RADIUS 300.00 FEET; lHENCE RUN A DISTANCE Of 106.45 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND
SAID SOUTH UNE THROUGH A DELTA ANGLE OF 2019'49" (CHORD DISTANCE Of 105.89 FEET BEARING N7411'23"E)
TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE: THENCE RUN A DISTANCE OF 58.20 FEET ALONG THE ARC Of A CIRCUlAR CURVE
TO THE RIGHT, Of RADIUS 450.00 FEET THROV.GH A DELTA ANGLE OF 07'24'35" (CHORD DISTANCE OF 58.15 FEET
BEARING N67"4J'46"E) ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE; lliENCE RUN SOO'46'2S"W, A DISTANCE Of 431.07 FEET ALONG
lliE EAST UNE OF SAID flORIO A POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT; THENCE RUN N8913'3S"W, A
DlST~NCE OF 155.00 FEET TO lHE PDlNT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 325,333 SQUARE FEET OR 7.47 ACRES, MORE OR LE5,S..
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
FOR SKETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVE'I1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE'I1NGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAWN BY: ~F CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/29/04 SCALE: NA I REV:
ACCESS EASEMENT IN TRACT G.C,~2.
FOREST Gl...EN OF NAPLES, Of SEC 2-50-2E PROJECT No; 020901 OWG No:SEC2T-AE(AE2) I SHEET: 2 Of 2
"
Agenda Item No.1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 108 of 236
EXHIBIT Ii
Page-'&of I ~O
PROJECT 70~Cf ;;z;
PARCEL q S-S--
FOLIO 3 :.2.7:< 0000 ~d-2-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN TRACT G.C,-2, OF FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES,
SECllON 2, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
R-3QO.OO'
L-15.0a'
!P02'52'3J"
C-15.0a'
COB-N85'47':H"E
~
ig~
~ ~i
FOUO NO.:
32720000222
15'
~
o
,...
589'13'35"EI ~
155.00' '8 F
155,00' '!! ~
8913'35" ~
I
I
TRACT G.C.-:2
170'
m;
C-CHORD
CDB-CHORD BEARING
F.P.&:L-f1.ORIDA POWER &: UGHT co.
L-LENGlli
O.R.'- OFFlCIAL RECORD BOOK/PAGE
R-RAoIUS
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
PB - PLAT BOOK
PC - PAGE
P.O.B.-POlNT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C,-POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
11 - DELTA ANCLE P.O.B.
f;: ~
<'I In
if f;:
8 ~
z 8
en
F".P.&:L I
EASEMENT
O.R.
850/974
I
I
I SOUTH LINE Of FOREST GlEN
[OF NAPLES, PB 31, PC 94-lO3
AND SECTION :2
N88'17'44"E
"63,55'
P.O.C.
SW CORNER
SECTION 2
:;-~.'~" "'173)
P~~~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORjpA UCENSE NO. I.S 4876
n-tIS~DAY OF~ 2004.
SEE SHEET :2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPllON
~
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 2. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVE't1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, fORT MYERS, nORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX; (239)277-7179 EMAIL.: SURVE't1NGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: ~F CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DAlE: 8/29/04 SCALE: 1"-200'
IS' UTIUTY EASEMENT IN TRACT G.C.-2,
FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES, OF SEC 2-50-2 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC2T-AE(P2)
EXHIBIT A
Page 10:1. of I ~
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 109 of 236
PROJECT 70'6?1 ;2)
PARCEL C; ~~
FOLIO S ~ 7 Zc:x:>C>C> .;J.;:L Z-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN TRACT G.C,-2, OF FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES,
SECTION 2, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION: A IS-FOOT STRIP OF' lAND LYING TRACT G.C.-2, fOREST GLEN Of NAPLES, PLAT BOOK 31 PAGE
94-103, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBUC RECORDS OF COlliER COUNTY, f1.ORIDA,
ALSO BEING IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST:
COMMENCING "T THE SOUlliWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2, THENCE RUN N6817'''''''"E, A DISTANCE OF" 1,163.55
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID fOREST GlEN OF NAPLES AND SAID SECTION 2 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE RUN NOO'46'2S"E. A DISTANCE OF 2094.28 FEET ALONG lliE WEST UNE OF A 17o-FOOT R.ORIDA POWER
AND UGHT RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN omCIAL RECORDS BOOK 850, PAGE 974, SAID PUBUC
RECORDS, AS IT UES IN SAID TRACT G.C.-2 TO THE SOUTH UNE OF TRACT "A" (FOREST GIDl BOULEVARD), AND A
POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF RADIUS 300.00 FEET; THENCE RUN A DISTANCE OF Hl.06 FEET
AlONG SAID CURVE AND SAID SOUTH UNE THROUGH A DELTA ANGlE Of 02'52'33"E (CHORD DISTANCE OF 15.06
FEET BEARING N85'47'34"E): lliENCE RUN SOO'46'2S"W, A DISTANCE OF 378.08 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS
PARALLEL TO SAID WEST EASEMENT LINE; THENCE RUN S8913'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET TO THE EAST
LINE OF SAID f1.0RlDA POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT; THENCE RUN SOO'46'2S"W, A DISTANCE OF
15.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE; lliENCE RUN N8913'35"W, A DISTANCE OF lM.OO FEET; THENCE RUN
SOO'46'2S"W, A DISTANCE OF 1701.85 FEET ALONG A LINE TH"T RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID WEST EASEMENT LINE;
THENCE RUN S8817'44"W, A DISTANCE Of 15.01 FEET ALONG SAID SOUlli Uf:jE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 33,743 SQUARE FEET OR 0.77 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
FOR S1<ETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVE'YlNG AND MAPPING
3900 COlONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELE:Y AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ..RF CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/29/04 SCALE: NA IREV: 10/20/04
15' unuTY EASEl.tENT IN TRACT G.C.-2,
FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES, OF SEC 2-S0-2f PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:Sf:C2T-AE(P2) ISHEET: 2 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
Page 103 of J P/
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Pag,e 110 of 236
PROJECT 70fSq~1
PARCEl 7 S- ~
FOLIO 3;Z 7:2 OOOt!2_J;>-;:J-~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 3
IN TRACT G,C.-2, OF FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES,
SECTION 2, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
w
.
!J&
PROPOSED IS' ~ to
unUTY g ~
EASEMENT ~ Z N89'3'35"~,
4<),00' ~
---- -i g}3
----~I/ g~
PROPOSED PRODUCTION ~ f'""4O:'OO:- z
WELL NO. .3 UTIUTY EASEMENT J&J S8S13'35"E
11).
!'Ig
~tO
goo
z
S89'J'3S"E
100.00'
8
g
L'
~~
/.
:ro
In
N
i
-
P.0.B1
N8913'3S"W
100.00'
F.P.&:L R/W
EASEMENT
O.R. 850/974
~
~I ~
~t~!
w wt:'i
':n ~:ro
!'4/ f-'
~ l/)~
g t:'i SOUTH UNE or FOREST GLEN
4' f or NAPLES. PB 31, PG 94-103
AND SECTION 2
I'--- 1333.70' _ _ _
TRACT G.C.-2
PB ", PC "-,,, 7
FOUO NO.:
3272??oo222
-
KEY:
F.P.&:L-f1.ORIDA POWER &: UGHT COl.tPANY
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
O.R/~ OFF1CIAL RECORD BOOKjPAGE
PB - PLAT BOOK
PG - PAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POlNT OF COI.tMENCEMENT
lM'M
P.O.C.
SW CORNER
SECTION 2
~-- --~~---
J S N. WILKISON (FOR THE FlRM LB6773)
OFESSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.0RI.QA UCENSE NO. LS 4876
llitS ~4>AY OF d4= 2004.
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFKEY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONiAl BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT M'l'ERS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGCCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ~F CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEl DESCRIPlION: WELL NO.3 DATE: 8/29/04 SCALE: 1".60' REV: 10/20/04
m.lP CONSlRUCTlON EASEMDlT IN TRACT G.c.-2,
FOREST GLEN OF' NAPla, OF SEC 2-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No:SEC2W-AE(TCJ) SHEET: 1 OF 2
l:HUE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 2. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDlNA TE SYSTEM, f1.A. EAST ZONE. '83/"90.
EXHIBIT A
Page~of (5"0
Agenda Item No. 10C
PROJ C Mall 10,2005
E TPa~01~6V2.3ft'
PARCEl 7 ~e:,
FOLIO 5.;l 7~ OOOO,;2..;:L <-.
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 8
IN TRACT G,C.-2, OF FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES,
SECTION 2, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING TRACT G.C.-2, FOREST GLEN OF" NAPLES, PLAT BOOK 31 PAGE 94-103, AS
RECORDED IN niE PUBUC RECORDS OF COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA, ALSO BEING IN SECTION 2. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST:
CO......ENCING AT THE SOUlliWEST CORNER Of SAID SECTION 2, lliENCE RUN N88'17'44"E. A DISTANCE OF 1,333.70
FEET ALONG THE SOUlli LINE OF SAID FOREST GlEN OF" NAPLES AND SAID SECTION 2; niENCE RUN NOO'46'25"E, A
DISTANCE OF 1612,64 FEET ALONG THE EAST UNE OF A "O-FooT Fl.ORIDA POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-or-WAY
EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OFFlCIAL RECORDS BOOK 650, PAGE 974, SAID PUBUC RECORDS, AS IT LIES IN SAID
TRACT G.C,-2 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO'~'25"E, A DISTANCE OF 65.00 FEET ALONG
SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN S89"13'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NOO'46'25"E, A DISTANCE
OF 50.00 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARAu.EL TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN N8913'35"W, A DISTANCE
OF 40.00 FEET: THENCE RUN NOO'~'25"E, A DISTANCE OF 65.00 FEET AlONG SAID EAST UNE; lHENCE RUN
S8913'35"E, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOO'46'25"W, A DISTANCE OF 180.00 FEET ALONG A UNE
THAT RUNS PARAlLEL TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN N89"13'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE POINT
OF" BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 16,000 SQUARE FEET OR 0.37 ACRES, "'ORE OR LESS.
, .
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
FOR SKETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BL W,. SUITE 4, FORT M'YERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: ~F CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: WEll NO.3 DATE: 8/29/04 SCALE; NA I REV:
TnlP CONSllWCllON EASalENT IN TRACT o.c.-2,
FOREST GlEN OF HAPlES, OF SEC 2-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWC No:SEC2W-AE(TCJ) ISHEET: 2 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
Page 1.22::. of ( &JO
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 112 of 236
PROJECT 70'1/1 :z.j
PARCEL q S- ~
FOLIO :5;< 7;) OO()() C).;2... "'2-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO" 3
IN TRACT G.C.-2, OF FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES,
SECTlON 2, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA
PROPOSED 15'
UTILITY
''''.'NT =i
S8913'JS"E
40.00'
-- -
--~
,II)
g!'f
d;\!
_ _ 108
z
~
iQ-
. 8
~~
L'
~~
J.
P.O.B.
N891."3S.W
40,00'
~I
10
~r
KEY' ~
F.P.&:L-FlORIDA POWER &: UGHT COMPANY} ; ..,.J ~ L TRACT G.C.-2
R/W - RlGHT-OF-W^, "e P. 31, PC ....,0.1 7
O.R. - orneAl "COR<> .O""/PAGE ~ ffi rouo NO.,
PB - PLAT BOOK k. ;l; 32720000222
PC - PAGE w 0 lil
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING :0 w ~
P.O.C.-POINT Of CO......ENCE...ENT ~I ~ <t. .
8 ~ Q: SOUTH UNE OF FOREST GlEN
::zj I&J f OF NAPLES, PB 31, PG 94-103
~ ANO SEcnON ,
I'-- 1333.70 _ _ -
F.P.&:L. R/W
EASEMENT
O.R. 650/974
l."""O'
P.O.C.
SW CORNER
SECllON 2
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
:;;;"-~~rnt"R" lam,)
p=dii;:"'~ SURVEYOR AND "'APPER
nOR!!'A UCENSE NO LS 4876
lliIS~AY OF ~ 2004. ll'US IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAll: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAYIN BY: ~F CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPnON: WELL NO.3 DATE: 8/29/04 SCALE: 1...,:50. REV: 10/20/04
unuTY EASEMENT IN lRACT Q,C.-2,
FOREST GlEN OF NAPLES. OF SEe 2-50--26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC2W-AE(PJ) I SHEET: 1 OF 2
liQIE;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CAlCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 2. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
Agenda Item NO.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 113 of 236
EXHIBIT A_
Page IDb oLl ~o
PROJECT 70 g Cj ::1./
PARCEL q t;;'("
FOLIO '3 ;27;;z, " Doo;t22-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 3
IN TRACT G,C.-2, OF FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES,
SECTION 2, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING mACT G.C,-2, FOREST GLEN Of NAPLES, PLAT BOOK 31 PAGE 94-103, AS
RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, f1.0RlDA, ALSO BEING IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 28 EAST:
COl.tMENONG AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2, lHENCE RUN N8e'7'......"E, A DISTANCE OF 1,333.70
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FOREST GLEN Of NAPLES AND SAID SECTION 2; THENCE RUN NOO'46'2S"E, A
DISTANCE OF l,6n,64 FEET ALONe THE EAST UNE OF A 170-FOOT flORIDA POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY
. EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OFFlOAl RECORDS BOOK 850, PAGE 974, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS, AS IT lIES IN SAID
mACT G.C,-2 TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUE NOO'46'2S"E, A DISTANCE Of 50.00 FEET ALONG
SAID EAST LINE: THENCE RUN 58913'35"[. A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET, lliENCE RUN SOO'46'25"W, A DISTANCE
OF 50.00 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN N8913'35"W, A DISTANCE
OF 40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2,000 SQUARE FEET OR 0.05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR SKETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SLlRVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEl DESCRIPTION: WELL NO.3 DATE: 8/29/04 SCALE: 1"-30' I REV: 10/20/04
U11lllY EASDtENT IN lRACT O.C.-2,
FOREST GlDl OF NAPlES, OF SEe 2-SQ-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No:5EC2W-AE(P3) ISHEET: 2 Of 2
EXHIBIT A
Page~of I~
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 114 of 236
PROJECT 70'01.2.-/
PARCEL "B S- 7
F OLI 0 2'.:z 7.2. 0000 ri!.:l. ~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN mACT G.C,-1, OF FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES,
SECTION 2, TWP 50 S, Ref 26 E, COWER COUNlY, flORIDA
BECK BLVD.
P.O.B.
NW CORNER
TRACT G.C.-l
PB 31, PG 94-103
I
I~ i.1
I ~ ~
PROPOSED 15'
UnuTY EASEMENT
170'
"11
00
.:Z:
C)o
~~
e: f;l
!iE.Y:
C-CHORD
COB-CHORD BEARING
F.P.&:l.-f1.ORIDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
L -LENGlli
O.R. - OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK/PAGE
R-RADIUS
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
PS - PLA T BOOK
PG - PAGE
P.O.B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
A - DELTA ANGLE
F.P.&:L
EASEMENT
O.R.B.
850/974 a.
fi
~
~
"
!oJ
.
II)
!'l
R-200,OO'
L-611.68'
lPol7'05'~9"
c-SlI.46'
CDB-N72"34'23"E
;~~d-~~-;,~ lB'",)
~SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORIQA lJ,CEt~SE NO'"7'~B76
THIS ZoU.lbAY OF ~ 2004.
S~lli R/W LINE
DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF lAND LYING IN TRACT
G.C.-1, FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES, PlAT BOOK 31
PAGE 94-103, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBUC
RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, flORIDA. ALSO BEING
IN SECTION 2. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST:
COMMENCING AT THE NORllil'tEST CORNER OF SAID
TRACT G.C.-l, THENCE RUN N89"55'16"E, A
DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SECK BOULEVARD TO lliE
POINT or BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE N89"5S'IS"E,
A DISTANCE Of 155.02 FErT ALONG SAID SOUlli
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE; lliENCE RUN SOO'46'25"W, A
DISTANCE OF 3042.82 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE
OF SAID TRACT G.C.-l, ANO A 170-FOOT flORIDA
POWER AND LIGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, AS
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 850, PAGE
974, SAIO PUBUC RECORDS, AS IT UES IN SAID
TRACT G.C.-l TO THE NORlli UNE OF TRACT "A"
(FOREST GLEN BOULEVARD), AND A POINT ON A
NON-TANGENT CURVE TO lliE LEFT, OF RADIUS
5S0.00 FEET: THENCE RUN A DISTANCE OF" 105.86
FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID NORlli LINE
THROUGH A DELTA ANGlE OF l1'01'39"E (CHORD
DISTANCE OF" 1OS.69 FEET BEARING S69'32'18"W) TO
A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE RUN A
DISTANCE Of 59.68 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT, OF RADIUS 200.00
FEET lliROUGH A DELTA ANGLE OF 17'05'49"
(CHORD DISTANCE OF 59.46 FEET BEARING
N72'J4'23"E) ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE; lliENCE
RUN NOO'46'25"E, A DISTANCE OF 3097.14 FEET
AI.QNG A LINE THAT RUNS PARAllEL TO lliE WEST
LINE OF TRACT G.C.-l TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 475,922 SQUARE FEET OR 10.93 ACRES.
MORE OR LESS.
R-S50.00'
L-105.88'
lPo11"01'39"
c-106,69'
COB-S69"32'18"W
tfQJf;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 2. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/"90.
lHlS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOClA lES, INC.
SURVE'r1NO AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BlVD., SUllE 4, FORT M'l'ERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)2n-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAll: SURVEYlNGGCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: .RF CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRlPnON: DATE: 8/29/04 SCAlE: '"-200' REv.' 10/20/04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN TRACT G.C.-l, .
FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES, OF SEC 2-50-2 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG NO:SEC2T-AE(AE1) SHEET: I OF 1
EXHIBIT Ii
Page~ of (.,v
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 115 of 236
PROJECT 70'B c; ~/
PARCEL q S 7
FOLIO "3;:1. 7 ;}.OOOO cil2 2-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN TRACT G,C,-l, OF FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES,
SECTION 2, TwP 50 S, RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
P.O.B.
NW CORNER
TRACT G.C.-1
PB 31, PG 94-103
m:
C-CHORD
COB-CHORD BEARING
F.P,&:I..-FLORIOA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
l-LENGTH .
O.R, - OFFICIAl RECORD BOOK/pAGE
R-RADIUS
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
PB - PLAT BOOK
PG - PIIGE
P.O,B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O,C,-POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
A - DELTA ANGlE
...
.. W UNE
TRACT G.C.-l
R-200.00'
L-HU3'
.(po 4'20'07"
C-15,13'
CDB-S8317'21"W
JA~~" lB677J)
PR~~:~~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.0RIDA UCENSE Ntk 1.,S 4876
THIS~DAY Of~ 2004.
~ J;,
, ~
i ~
"j.:a
UO~
,z
C)
13QN
g~~
170'
F,P,&;L
EASEMENT
O.R.B,
850/974
t:
N
~ F
z ~
~
e\.. '110.
G~~ .
~QI\t..S~...c"'i ....
SOUTH R/W UNE
DESCRIPTION: A 1S-FOOT STRIP OF lAND
lYING IN TRACT G,C.-1, FOREST GLEN OF
NAPLES, PLAT BOOK 31 PAGE 94-103, AS
RECORDED IN THE PUBUC RECORDS OF
COWER COUNTY, f1.0RIDA, AlSO BEING IN
SECnON 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST:
BEGINNING AT lliE NORlliWEST CORNER OF
SAID TRACT G.C.-l, lliENCE RUN NB9'55'16"E,
A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH
RIGHT-Of-WAY UNE Of BECK BOULEVARD;
THENCE RUN SOO'46'25"W, A DISTANCE OF
3097.37 FEET ALONG A UNE lHAT RUNS
PARALlEL TO THE WEST UNE OF SAID TRACT
G.C,-1, AND PARALLEL WIlli A 170-FOOT
f1.ORIDA POWER AND UGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OFFICiAl
RECORDS BOOI< 850, PAGE 974, SAID PUBUC
RECORDS, AS IT UES IN SAID TRACT G.C.-1
TO THE NORTH UNE OF TRACT "A" (FOREST
GLEN BOULEVARD), AND A POINT ON A
NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, Of
RADIUS 200,00 FEET: lliENCE RUN A
DISTANCE OF 15.13 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE
AND SAID NORlli UNE THROUGH A DELTA
ANGlE OF 04"20'07" (CHORD DISTANCE Of
15.13 FEET BEARING SB317'21"W): lliENCE
RUN NOO'46'25"E. A DISTANCE OF 3099.11
FEET ALONG SAID WEST UNE OF TRACT G.C,-1
TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 46.475 SQUARE FEET OR 1.07
ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
MQIE:
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlEI.D SURVEY Of
SECTION 2, BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAlL: SURVEYlNGG'COONER,COM
CUENT; GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ~F CHECKED BY: J,N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/29/04 SCALE: 1"-200' REV: 10/20/04
15' UTlUTY EASWENT IN TRACT G.C,-l,
FOREST GLEN Of NAPlES, Of SEC 2 50-2 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC2T-AE(P1) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Page..Lc2!i of (<'0
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 116 of 236
PROJECT 7rJ ~4 ~ I
PARCEL "3~1>
FOLIO 7t,iq~0~O~!;"5
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
TRACT 10, TOLLGAlE COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE 2
COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
I I
TRACT B-l1
T.C.C.
PH. 2
L'
~~
15.00',
P.O.C.
NW CORNER
TRACT 10
_ _ N89'56'16"E
IP.O.B. 1!le.80'
t
F.P.&:L R/W
EASEMENT
!SEX:
F.P.&:L - flORIDA PO'/tER &: UGHT CO.
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
T.C.C. - TOLLGATE COMMERClAL CENTER
PB - PLAT BOOI<
PG - PACE
PH. - PHASE
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
F'.O.C. - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
TRACT 9
T.C.C.
PH. 2
TRACT 10 ~
T.C.C., PH. 2 :8 ]a
PB 18, PC 24 ~:;.
"C;;
FOUO NO.: Sl
711885050565 tIS
I ~ PROPOSED 15'
1 UTIUTY EASEMENT
153,44'
sa9"M 02 W
'-
i~
TRACT 15
T.C.C.
PH. 3
STATE ROAD 84
(BECK BOULEVARD)
DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN TRACT 10, TOLLGATE COMMERClAL CENTER, PHASE 2, AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 24, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, flORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOlLOWS:
COMMENCING AT lliE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 10, SAID TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE 2, THENCE
RUN NORTH 89'56'16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF' 15.00 FEET ALONG lliE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT B-l1 OF SAID
TOlLGATE COMMERCE CENlER TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCr:; CONTINUE NORTH 89'56'16" EAST fOR A
DISTANCE OF 156.60 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY UNE OF SAID TRACT B-l1 TO lliE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
TRACT 10; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'46'58" '/tEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 214.20 FeET ALONG lliE EAST UNE OF SAID
TRACT 10 TO lliE SOUlliEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1O;; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'56'02" WEST fOR A DISTANCE
OF 153.44 FEET ALONG SAID THE SOUlli LINE Of SAID TRACT 10; lliENCE RUN NORlli 00'03'44" '/tEST FOR A
DISTANCE OF 214.19 FEET ALONG A UNE lliAT IS 15.00 FEET EAST OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND
PARALLEL TO, SAID WEST LINE Of TRACT 10, TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 33,204 sa. FT., OR 0.76 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
;~.d~~~~S~~;~~-;'~M LB6773)
PR~~:...0 SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FUl::!P.tYfENSE N.Q. ~s 4876
lHl "bAY OFUc{:"-. 2004. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A lES, INC.
SURVEYlNO AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUItE 4, FORT M't'ERS, A.ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)217-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAlw SURVE"r1NG<<t:COONER.COM
ClIENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ~F CHECKED BY; J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: . DAlE: 8/27/04 SCAlE: 1"-100'
ACCESS EASEMENT, TRACT 10, T.C.C.
PH 2 Of SEe 35-49-26 PROJECT No:. 020901 DWG No:SEC35h\E(AEIS> SHEET: 1 Of 1
liQIE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY Of
SECTION 35. BASIS OF BEARINC: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, fLA. EAST ZONE, '83/'90.
REV: 10-20-04
EXHIBIT-L-
Page.JJ..Qof I f)O
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 117 of 236
PROJECT 70'872..)
PARCEl 9 t;;"<;? -
FOLIO 7" {?'ij' ~6 S-V ~5S
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
16' UTILITY EASEMENT
TRACT 10. TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER. PHASE 2
COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
TRACT B-l1
T.C,C.
PH, 2
Nm'81 '16.E
5, Po'
P,O.B~ ?.. ~ ~.&:~;-
NW CORNE~ ~ _ EASEMENT
TRACT 10 ;", ~
;: ~ TRACT 10
TRACT 9 N N T.C.C"PH. 2
~if.,C2 i~ i~ PB 18, PG 24
FOLIO NO.:
711885050555
I I
W:
F,P,&L - f1.0RID... POWER &: UGHT CO,
R/W - RIGHT-Of-W"'Y
T.C,C. - TOLLG"'TE COMMERCIAL CENTER
PB - PLAT BOOK
PG - P"'GE
PH, - PHASE
P.D.B, - POINT Of BEGINNING
P,O,C, - POINT OF' COMMENCEMENT
- 1--15' 0 110'
115,00'
S89OS8'02.W
STATE ROAO 84
(BECK BOULEVARD)
-+
"I
I
I
I
I
TRACT 15
T.e.e,
PH. 3
"
~~
/.
DE~IPnON, A 15-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYlNG IN TRACT 10, TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE 2, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOO!< 18, PAGE 24, PU~l;IC RECORDS OF' COWER COUNTY, f1.0RID.... DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NOR1li\\'EST CORNER OF mACT 10, SAIO TOLLGATE COUMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE 2, THENCE RUN
NORTH 81r56'18. EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 15,00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY UNE OF SAID mACT B-l1; THENCE
RUN SOUTH 00'03'....4. EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 214,19 FEET AlONG A UNE THAT IS 15.00 FEET EAST Of (AS
IAEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARALLEL TO, SAID \\'EST UNE OF' 'TRACT 10; THENCE RUN SOUlli 89'56'02.
\\'ES,T FOR A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET AlONG SAID THE SOUTH UNE OF' SAID TRACT 10 TO THE \\'EST UNE Of SAID
TRACT 10: THENCE RUN NORTH 00'03'''''''. WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF" 214.19 FEET ALONG SAID WEST UNE TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 3213 SQ, FT.. OR 0.07 ACRES, UORE OR LESS
-~:d.:~_
JA N. WlU<ISON (FOR THE FIRM LB8773)
P SSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.ORjDA IJCENSE Nq" LS 4878
THIs"l-~1'OA Y or fl.s1J:::.. 2004,
liQ.It;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES. AND AREAS
CALCVLA TED ARE BASED ON A AELO SURVEY OF
SECTION 35. BASIS OF BEARING: S'A TE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA, EAST ZONE, '83/90,
lHlS IS NOTA SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI AlES, INC.
SURVEYlNO AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD,. SUiTE..., FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 331112
PHONE: (239)2n-072.2 FAX: (2311)277-7179 EMAlL: SURVE"'NGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAWN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/27/04 SCALE: '..100' IREV: 10-20-04
15' UllUTY EASD.lENT, 'TRACT 10.
T.C,C. PH 2 or SEC 35-49-28 PROJECT No: 0201101 DWG NO:SEC;JI5T-AE(Ptl) I SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT !J
Page.J.!Lof (,,,
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 118 of 236
PROJECT 70 -Sq ;LI
PARCEl 'is 5<1
FOlIO 7ft,tf,qbOb()~r-2_
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN TRACT 11 AND TRACT B-II. TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER. PHASE 2,
OF SECTION 35, TWP 49 S. RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY. FlORIDA
NORTH UNE
TRACT U
11.I-
z~
~~ I
mtg'".l4 ~
PH. 2
I .
8
~i
PROPOSED 15'
UTIUlY EASEMENT I
FOUO NO.:
76885050652
TRACT 12
T,C.C,
PH. 2
I 11.I
I ~
~
I z
I
---J
VACATED
TOI.I.HOUSE
DRIVE
II
;~~;a;1H~-;;;~ "'''')
pe~AL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
~~I~~~~N~ ~~4.
TRACT n
T.C.C.
PH. 3
TRACT 11
T.C,C., PH. 2
PB 18, PO 24
8
~
It)
w~
z-
:JI-
~g
DESCRIPl1ON: A PARCEl LYING IN TRACT
11 AND TRACT B-II, TOLLGATE
COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE 2, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 24,
PUBUC RECORDS Of COWER COUNTY,
flORIDA, DESCRIBED AS F"OLlOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF' TRACT 10, SAID TOLLGATE
CO......ERClAl CENTER, PHASE 2. ll-IENCE
RUN Soolli 89'56'16" WEST !-"OR A
DISTANCE Of 155,02 nET ALONG lHE
SOUTHERLY UNE OF' SAID TRACT B-II;
THENCE RUN NORlH 00.48'58" EAST FOR
A DISTANCE OF' 598,06 FEET ALONG A
LINE THAT IS 15.00 FEET EAST OF (AS
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND
PARAu.El TO ll-tE ~ST UNE OF TRACT
11 AND ALSO PARAlLEL TO ll-tE WEsT
UNE OF A flORIDA POWER AND UGHT
COMPANY EASEl.tENT TO THE NORlli UNE
Of SAID TRACT 11: lliENCE RUN NORTH
89'56'16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF
155,02 F"EET AlONG SAID NORTH UNE:
lliENCE RUN SOUlli 00'46'58" WEST FOR
A DISTANCE OF 5li18.06 FEET ALONG THE
EAST UNE OF' SAID TRACT 11 SAID UNE
ALSO BEING THE EAST UNE OF SAID
f1.0RIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
EASEl.tENT TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 92,700 sa. FT., OR 2.13
ACRES, MORE OR LESS
ISEX:
COR. - CORNER
F,P,&;L-FlORlDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
T.C.C.-TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER
PB - PLAT BOOK
PG - PAGE
PH. - PHASE
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
WUE;
ll-tE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES,
AND AREAS CAlCULATED ARE
BASED ON A FlELO SURVEY OF
SECl10N 35, BAStS OF' BEARING.
STATE PlANE COORDINATE SYSTE...,
FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/90,
nits 'S NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI AlES, INC.
SUR\IE'I'lNG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD,. SUITE 4. FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl: SURVE'I'lNGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, u.c DRAWN BY: .ifF" CHECKED BY: J.N,W,
PARCa DESCRIPllON: DATE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 10-20-04
ACCEsS EASEMEHT IN TRACT 11
T.C.C. PH 2 OF' SEe 35-49-28 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC35T-AE(AE5) SHEET: 1 OF 1
170'
F,P,&:L
EASEMENT
~
~
~
, 090'
TRACT 10
T,C.C.
PH, 2
P.O.B,
NE COR.
TRACT 10
EXHIBIT ~
page.1.LA.. ot I ~
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 119 of 236
PROJECT 7 oeq :2./
PARCEL q ~9
FOLIO 7~ 4~&oro", {"""::z....
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN TRACT 11 AND TRACT 8-11, TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE 2,
OF SECT10N 35, TWP 49 5, RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA
--~~~~~---
.JA'" N. WILKISON (FOR tHE FIRM LB6773)
PR ONAL SURvEyOR AND MAPPER
~?:'it~SEot~~~4. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONiAl BLVD,. SUITE 4. FORT M'l'ERS, 'flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAlL: SURVEYlNOOCOONER,COM
WENT: ORm.&:Y AND HANSEN, U.C DRAVtW BY: oRF CHECKEO BY: .J.N.W,
PAAca DESCRJpnON: , DATE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1".100' REV: 10-20-04
1~' UllUTY EASEMENT IN TRACT 11
T,C.C, PH 2 OF SEC 35-49-28 PROJECT No: 0.20901 DWO NO:SEC35T-AE(PI5) SHEET: 1 OF 1
NORTH UNE
TRACT 11
TRACT 14
T.C.C,
PH, 2
I TRACT 17
T,C,O.
PH,3
8
~
F'OUO NO,:
76885050652
,
i
I
I
I
I.,
I
I
TRACT 12
T,C,C,
PH. 2
"
VACATED
TOl1.HOUSE
DRIVE
TRACT
B-II
P.O.B, 155.02'
SS9'58'16WW'
11 - P'O~
i~NE COR,
TRACT 10
15, 0
S89'56'1S W
II
TRACT 10
T.C,C,
PH. 2
DESCRIPTIONI A 15-FOOT STRIP OF lAND
L 'Y1NG IN TRACT 11 AND TRACT B-II,
Tou.OATE COMMERCIAL CanER. PHASE
2, AS RECORDED IN PlAT BOOK 18,
PAGE 24, PUBUC RECORDS OF COWER
COUNTY, F1.ORIDA, DESCRIBED AS
FOll.OWS:
CO......ENClNG AT THE NORTHEAST
CORNER' OF TRACT 10, SAID TOLLGATE
COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE 2, lHENCE
RUN SOUTH 89'56'IS" WEST FOR A
DISTANCE OF" 11515,02 Ft:ET ALONG lHE
SOUTHERLY UNE OF SAID TRACT 8-11 TO
THE POINT QF BEGINNING: THENCE
CONllNUE SOUTH 89'56'16" WEST FOR A
DISTANCE Of" 15,00 Ft:ET TO lHE
INTERSECll0N WITH A SOUTHERLY
EXTENSION Of THE WEST UNE OF SAID
TRACT ll: THENCE RUN NORtH
00'46'58" EAST fOR A DISTANCE OF
598,08 FEET ALONG SAID SOUlHERL Y
EXTENSION AND SAIO WEST LINE OF
TRACT 11 TO THE NORlH UNE OF SAID
TRACT ll: THENCE RUN NORtH 89'56'lS"
EAST FOR A DISTANCE Of 15.00 FEET
ALONG SAID NORm UNE; lHENCE RUN
SOUTH 00"48'58" WEST FOR A DISTANCE
OF 598,OS Fl:ET ALONG A UNE THAT IS
15,00 FEET EAST OF (AS MEASURED AT
RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARAU.EL TO. SAID
WEST UNE OF TRACT 11, AND
SOUTHERLY EXTENSION ll1EREOF, TO lHE
POINT OF' BEGlNNINO,
CONTAINING 8969 SQ. FT" OR 0,21
ACRES. "'ORE OR lESS,
1m::
COR, - CORNER
F.P,c!d...-F1.ORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
T,C.C,-TOLLOATE COlotMERClAL CENTER
PH - PHASE
P,O.B, - POINT Of" BEGINNING
tmm
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES,
AND AREAS CALC\JlA TED ARE
8ASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECllON 35, BASIS OF BEARING:
STATE PLANE COORDINATE S'(S1O,(,
f1.A, EAST ZONE, '83/90,
EXHIBIT A
Page-L.L.:!.of I ,>0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
~agf), ~o 07-36
PROJECT O~ 2. . _
PARCEL 7! bO
FOLIO 7'~q~oos-oo~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN PARCEL 1, TOLlGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE ONE,
OF SECTION 35, TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
INTERSTA TE 75
SOUTI-lERL Y R/W LINE
--I ---
I
I
PROPOSED 15' ~L ' .
UTIUTY EASEMENT --2:::. I 65 090
FOLIO NO,:
76885005005
15'-/
w~ I
~6 I t'
1Il~ IX
~ D. I .
<- . ~ Ii
""~
l
r-
PARCEL TWO,
T,C.C" PH. ONE
PB 18, PG 24
KEX:
COR. - CORNER
F'.P,&:L-FLORlDA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
T.C.C'r-TOlLGATE COMUERCtAL CENTER
PB - PLAT BOOK
PG - PAGE
PH. - PHASE
P,O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
SOUTH LINE
PARCEL TWO
N. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB8773)
PR SSIONAl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FtOR!l2~ UCENSE N~ ~ 4878
1HIS'~DAY OF 2004,
I I
P.O,B.
NW COR.
TRACT 11,/
T.C.C.
PH. 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
170'
F.P.&:L -,
EASEl.tENT I
70,01'
S88'5(l'16"W I
TRACT .0.
T,C.C,
PH. J
TRACT 1 B
T.C.C.
PH. J
TRACT 17
T.C.C.
PH, 3
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
~
N
,...
.... iJ
~l&J
B~
~~
l1.jf
l5u
I-U
~...:
11.
'TRACT 11
T.C.C.
PH. 2
,.
~
~
~
tmIE:
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlElD SURVEY OF'
SECTION 35. BASIS OF' BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEt.I, FlA, EAST ZONE, '83/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, F1..0RIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAlL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER,COt.4
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAWN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPnON: DATE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV; 10-20-04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN PARCEL 1, T,C,C.
PH ONE OF SEC 35-49-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO:SEC3!lT-AE(AE4) SHEET: 1 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
Page...l!::L of (1) ()
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 121 of 236
P ROJE CT 7 0 ~ C; ;2. (
PARCEl ~bO
FOLIO 7'- 'lJ~~oo~~S-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN PARCEL 1, TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE ONE,
OF SECTION 35, TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPllON' A PARCEl OF LAND LYING IN PARCEL ONE, TOlLGATE COMMERCiAl CENTER, PHASE ONE, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 16, PAGE 1, PUBUC RECORDS OF' COWER COUNTY, f1.ORIDA. DESCRIBED AS FOlLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORlliWEST CORNER OF TRACT 11. TOlLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER PHASE 2, AS RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 24, THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'411'56" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 489.63 FEET ALONG A
UNE THAT IS 85 FEET EAST OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARALlEL TO THE WEST UNE OF SAID
PARCEl ONE AND PARALlEL TO 'fliE WEST UNE Of A HO-FOOT f1.ORIDA POWER & UGHT COMPANY EASEMENT:
THENCE RUN SOUTH 89"58'16" WEST FOR A DISTANCE Of' 70.01 F"EET ALONG A UNE lliAT IS AN EASTERlY
EX'TENSlON Of THE SOUTH UNE OF PARCEL TWO, SAID TOlLGATE COMMERCIAL PHASE ONE: THENCE RUN
NORTH 00'48'58. EAST FOR A DISTANCE Of 472.25 FEET AlONG A UNE THAT IS 15 fEET EAST OF' (AS
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARALlEL TO THE WEST UNE OF' SAID PARCEL ONE AND PARALLEL TO
THE WEST UNE OF A 170-FOOT f1.0RIDA 1"0v.t:R Ie UGHT COMPANY EASEMENT TO THE SOUTHERLY
RIGHT-Of-WAY UNE OF' INTERSTATE 75: lliENCE RUN SOUTH 87'55'12" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 70,02 FEET
ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 32.966 SQ. FT., OR 0.76 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
/
SEE SHEET 1 OF" 2
fOR SKETCH
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA TESt INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD,. SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33S112
PHONE: (23S1)217-0722 FAX: (23S1)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC ORAVtW BY: oRF CHECI<ED BY: J,N,W,
PARCEl DESCRIPllON: DATE: 8/27/CU SCAl.[: NA tREY:
ACCESS EASEMENT IN PARCEL 1, T,C,C, ..
PH ONE Of' SEC 35-49-26 PROJECT No; 020901 DWG NO;SEC35T-AE(AE4hSHEET: 2 OF' 2
EXHIBIT -A-
P.g....11f-of 1,,0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 122 of 236
PROJECT 70 "6q;;l.1 _
PARCEL 9 fa 0
FOl 10 _7 b ~ ~ ~ 00 ~t.X) ~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN PARCEL 1, TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE ONE,
OF SECTION 35, TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, flORIDA
INTERSTATE 75
587'55'12"[ P.O.B.
15.00' _ SOUTHERL Y R/W LINE
70'0~ - -I - - _
N87'55'12"W
P.O,C. I
NW COR,
'mACT 11,/
T.C,C.,
PH. 2
iii ~
'" ~
~ ...,.
FOLIO NO,:
76885005005
L.i
~~
SO
~~
a. if
I!lu
~ ,.. I--U
~ ~....:
~ a.
~ ~
.~ ~
15'
PARCEL TWO,
T.C,C.
PH. ONE
1SE.:l::
COR, r CORNER
F.P,&L.-f1.ORlDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
T,C,C.-TOLLGAlE CO"'MERCIAl CENTER
PH, - PHASE
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
R/W - RlGHT-OF"-WAY
SOUTH
PARCEL' .
I I
...-1~;.';.~~;;;-;;;,-;;;" IB"',)
PR~~ SUR'vtYOR AND MAPPER
f1.ORIDA UCENSE NO..... L$ 4876
THIS'~AY Of I.L.!::1:i.. 2004.
I
I
I
I
'mACT 11 I
T.C.C.
PH. 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
'mACT "D"
T,C.C.
PH. 3
TRACT 18
T.C.C.
PH, 3
TRACT 17
T.C.C.
PH. 3
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
tiQIE;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlElD SURVEY Of
SECTION 35. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COOROINA TE SYSTE.... FlA. EAST ZONE, '8Ji90,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COlONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE'11NGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: .mF CHECKED BY: J.N,W,
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DAlE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1".100' REV: 10-20-04
lIS' UTtUTY EASEUENT OF' PARCEl "
T,C,C. PH ONE OF' SEC 35-49-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No:SECJ5T-AE(P4) SHEET: 1 OF 2
170'
F'.P.&:L
EASEMENT
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 123 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Page..11Lof l ;;0
PROJECT 70 g 'i :2{
PARCEL q", 0
FOLIO 7 (..<(~()()~t:)o ~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN PARCEL 1. TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER. PHASE ONE.
OF SECTION 35. TWP 49 S. RGE 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY. FlORIDA
DESCRrPTION~ A 15-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN PARCEL ONE, TOllGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE Oll/E.
AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 16, PAGE 1, PUBUC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, F"LORIDA, DESCRIBED AS
FOllOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWC:ST CORNER OF TRACT 11, TOllGATE COt.tMERClAL CENTER PHASE 2, AS
RECORDED IN PlAT BOOK 18, PAGE 24, THENCE RUN NORTH 87'55'12" \\EST FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.02 FEET
ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY UNE OF INTERSTATE 75 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE RUN
SOUTH 00'46'58" WC:ST FOR A DISTANCE OF 472.25 FEET ALONG A LINE lHAT IS 15 FEET EAST OF (AS
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARAlLEL TO THE WC:ST LINE Of SAID PARCEL ONE AND A 170-FOOT
FLORIDA POWER &: LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE RUN SOUlli 8lJ'5S'lS" WEST FOR A DISTAII/CE OF
15,00 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT IS A EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUlli LINE OF PARCEL TWO, SAID
TOlLGATE COMMERCIAL PHASE ONE: THENCE RUN NORTH 00'46'58" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 472.81 FEET
ALONG SAID WEST UNE TO SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF INTERSTATE 75: THENCE RUN SOUTH
87'55'12" EAST 15,00 FEET ALONG SAID UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 7,088 SQ. FT., OR 0.16 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD,. SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 F'AX: (239)277-7179 WAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JRF CHECI<ED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPl1ON: DATE: 8/27/04 SCALE; NA REV: 10-20-04
IS' UTIUTY EASDIENT OF PARCEL 1,
T.C.C. PH ONE OF' SEe 35-4lJ-28 PROJECT No: 020901 OWO NO:SEC35T-At(P4) SHEET: 2 OF 2
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
fOR SKETCH
EXHIBIT A
F>age.J.!.1. of I t;"~
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 124 of 236
PROJECT 70 ~7 -'-I
PARCEl ~ b /
FOLIO ~/7q oooalt:60
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN TRACT "0-, WHITE LAKE CORPORATE PARK,
OF SECTION 35, 1WP 49 S, RGE 26 E. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
R-25.00'
L-2I,44'
, ...... ~49'Ol!'41"
C-20,79'
COB-N88'23'38"W
ORlli UNE WHITE LAKE
CORPORATE PARK
TRACT "0"
FOLIO NO,:
81790000180
o(
, ~I
I a'
ID
;k
-c
i'i
I
'" I;
..,C'~" I ~
".s'.s'~ 8
"oil I Z
~~ ,,0"'0
3'~~ ""- ~
>". "-
R-27oo.79'
L-153.50'
~3'5'23"
C-153.4S'
COB-N60'IO'59"W
,
,<
~
C-CHORD .,., : .
COB-CHORD BEARING
COR. - CORNER
F.P,&:L-FLORIDA POWER &: UGHT COMPANY
L-lENGTH
R-RADIUS
R/W - RIGHT-Or-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT Of' BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT Of' CO......ENCEl.tENT
Ii - DELTA ANGLE
~- ---__d~_
J S N. W!U<ISON (FOR THE FIR'" LB8773)
OFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND "'APPER
FLORI!'A I,lCENSE N9., LS 4876
THIS~AY Of'~ 2004.
DESCRIPTIotI OF A PORTION or TRACT "0", I'fHm:
LAKE CORPORATE PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 31, P"'GES 26 & 27, PUBUC RECORDS Of
COllER COUNTY, flORIDA. DESCRIBED AS rou.ows;
COM"'ENClNG AT THE NORTH~ST CORNER OF SAID
TRACT "0", THENCE RUN NS9"OO'Ol"E, A DISTANCE
Of 15.01 FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE ()f' SAID
TRACT "0" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUE N89"OO'OI"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.08
FEET "'LONG SAID NORTH UNE: lliENCE RUN SOO"
48'46"W, A DISTANCE OF' 802.05 FEET AlONG A
LINE THAT RUNS PARAlLEL TO THE ~ST UNE Of'
SAID TR"'CT "0" TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT
CURVE or RADIUS 25.00 F'EET; lliENCE RUN A
DISTANCE OF' 21.44 FEET ALONG THE "'RC OF SAID
CURVE TO lliE RIGHT THROUGH A DELTA ANGLE OF
49'06'....1., (CHORD DISTANCE or 20.79 FEET,
BEARING N88"23'3S"W) TO A POINT Of COMPOUND
CURVE; THENCE RUN A DISTANCE Of 153.30
FEET AlONG THE ARC Of A CIRCUlAR CURVE TO
THE RIGHT, RADIUS or 2700.79 rEET, AND THE
NORTH RIGHT-or-WAY UNE OF AN ACCESS ROAD,
lliROUGH A DELTA ANGlE OF 03"15'23", (CHORD
DISTANCE OF 153,48 FEET, BEARING N60"10'59"W)
FOR 153,50 FEET TO SAID WEST UNE: THENCE RUN
NOO'48'48"E, A DISTANCE or 72Ul FEET AlONG A
LINE THAT RUNS PARAlLEL TO SAID ~ST UNE TO
SAID NORTH UNE. AND TO THE POINT Of
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 118.940 SQUARE FEET. OR 2.73 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS.
ttQ.JI;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY Of
SECTION 23. BAStS or BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, 'S3(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA TES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: ~F" CHECKED BY: J.N,W,
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/27/04 SCALE; 1"-200' REV: 10-20-04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN TRACT "0"
CORPORATE PARK Of' SEC 35-49-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SECJ5T-AE(AE2) SHEET: 1 or 1
EXHIBIT A
Page~of It;;o
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 125 of 236
PROJECT 7 () ~'7 ;L I
PARCEl '1 to I
FOLIO ~ 1790000 l.g 0
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
16' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN TRACT -0-, WHIlE LAKE CORPORATE PARK,
OF' SECTION 35, TWP 49 S. RGE 26 E. COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTH LINE lIMITE LAKE
CORPORATE PARK
15'
(
!'
BI
CD
,..
-<
ai
" t> I
II g I
':~
~
TRACT
FOUO NO,:
81790000180
.....
W:
C-CHORD
COB-CHORD BEARING
F.P,&:L.-FlDRIDA POWER &: LIGHT COMPANY
L-LENGTH
R-RADIUS
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT Of BEGINNING
A - DELTA ANGLE
-- ~.:~~~~-
JA~:::N~~ISON (FOR THE FIRM LB5773)
PROFESSIONAL SUR'v'EYOR AND MAPPER
FlORIDA UCENSE NO.. t.S 4876
lliIS~DAY OF !lC;:., 2004.
DESCRIPTION OF" A 15-FOOT STRIP Of LAND IN
TRACT "0", lIMITE LAKE CORPORATE PARK, AS
RECORDEO IN PLAT BOOK 31, PAGES 26 &: 27,
PUBUC RECORDS OF COllER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID TRACT "D., THENCE RUN N89"OO'OI"E, A
DISTANCE OF 15.0t Ft:ET ALONG THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID TRACT "0"; THENCE RUN SOD.
48'4fj"W, A DISTANCE OF" 721.71 FEET ALONG
A LINE lliAT RUNS PARAllEL TO THE WEST
LINE OF SAID TRACT "0" TO THE NORTH
RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE OF AN ACCESS ROAD
AND TO A POINT ON A NON- TANGENT CURVE
Of RADIUS 2700.79 FEET; THENCE RUN A
DISTANCE OF" 17.47 F'EET ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE AND SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE THROUGH A DELTA ANGLE OF" 00"22'14",
(CHORD DISTANCE OF 17,47 FEET, BEARING
N5B"22'10"W) TO SAID WEST LINE: lliENCE RUN
NOO'48'46"E, A DISTANCE OF 712.29 FEET TO
SAID NORTH LINE TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 10,753 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.25
ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
.....
~
t!QIt;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 23. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDIN"TE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/'90.
lHIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURWYlNG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BL W.. SUITE 4, FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAlL: SURVE'YtNGClCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: .RF CHECKED BY: J,N.W.
PARCEL DESCRlPl1ON: DAlE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1"-200' REV: 10-20-04
15' unuTY EASEMENT IN TRACT .0"
CORPOR"TE PARK OF SEC 35-49-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWO NO:SEC315T-AE(P2) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
page...!!.1..of (tj:o
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 126 of 236
PROJECT 70$ q ~ I
PARCEl ~ to ;Z
FOLIO 00 ~ 9tg4-f.{ 0 3b r
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NORTH 1/2, OF SECTION 35,
TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FlORIDA
S89'2'~.E
155.00'
PROPOSED 15'
UnUTY EASE"'ENT
..~
~
2
SOUTH COUNTY
REGIONAL WATER
TREATMENT PlANT
170'
F.P,&:L
EASEMENT
ORB 681/1210
15' 0 90'
CITY GATE
COM"'ERCE CENTER
PHASE ONE
PLAT BOOK 41,
PAGES 6 &: 7
170'
F.P.&:t:.
EASEMENT
ORB 681/1212
~.P'O'C'
W 1/4 COR.
SECTION 35
~'OO'OI"E
S LINE Of
THE N 1/2
~
5
8
z
1230.84'
9'OO'OI"W
155,08'
WHITE LAKE
CORPORATE PARK
J~~o;-;;;'R" LB'77J)
=~~L SURvEyOR AND "'APPER
f1.ORlPA UCENSE NOoJ-i:-4876
THIS ~""bA Y OF 2004.
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
o
.....
~
FOUO NO,:
00298440304
KEX:
COR, - CORNER.
F,P.&:L-FlORIOA POWER &: UGHT CO,
ORB - ornCIAl RECORD BOOI<
PH - PHASE
p.o.a, - POINT OF" BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT OF COM"'ENCE"'ENT
'"
.
...,.
~
~ r SOUTH UNE
,-::,F ~ ~2
t!QIf:
THE PARCEL ~RING, DISTANCES,
AND AREAS CALCULATED ARE BASED
ON A FlElD SURVEY OF SECTION 35.
BASIS OF BEARING: STAlE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTE..., FlA. EAST
ZONE, '83;"90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOQA TES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, Fl.ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE'l1NGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAWN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL OESCRIPll0N: DATE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 10-20-04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE
N 1 2 or SEC 35-49-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OWO No:SEC35T-AE(AE1) SHEET: 1 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
page...L)J2of I t;"O
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10,2005
Page 127 of 236
PROJECT -70.g C; ;;./
PARCEl_ gb ~ -
FOLIO_OO ;t 9'3 4tfP3() Y
. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NORTH 1/2. OF' SEC1l0N 35.
TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E. COWER COUNTY. FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION.
A PARCEL OF" lAND LYING IN lliE NORlli 1/2 Of SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUlli, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY. FLORIDA. DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35, lliENCE RUN NBO'OO'Ol"E, FOR A DISTANCE OF"
1230.84 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE or THE NORlli 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 35. ALSO BEING lliE SOUTH LINE
Of CITY GATE COMMERCE CENTER, PHASE 1, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 41, PAGES 6 AND 7, PUBUC
RECORDS OF COlLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NOO'47'14"E, fOR A
DISTANCE Of 1049.53 FEET ALONG A LINE lliAT IS 15.00 FEET EAST or (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES),
AND PARAlLEL TO, lliE WEST LINES OF THE FLORIDA POM:R AND LIGHT COI.tPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS
AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECOROS BOOK B81, PAGE 1212 AND omClAL RECORDS BOOK B81. PAGE 1210;
lliENCE RUN S8912'46"E rOR A DISTANCE OF' 155.00 FEET; lliENCE RUN SOO"47'14"W, FOR A DISTANCE or
1044.70 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINES Of SAIO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENTS: THENCE RUN S80'OD'01"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.08 FEET ALONG SAID SOUlli LINE OF SAID
NORTH 1/2 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 162,303 SQ, FT., OR 3.73 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
FOR SKETCH
n."s IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A lES. INC.
SUR\IEYING AND MAPPING
~900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)2n-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAlL.: SURVE'r1NGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, u.c DRAWN BY: ~F CHEO<ED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEl DESCRIPllON: DAlE: 8/27/04 SCAl..E; '"..100' REV: 10-20-04
ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE
N 1-12 Of SEC 35-49-26 PROJECT .No: 020901 CWO No:SECJllT-AE(AE1) SHEET: 2 OF" 2
\
EXHIBIT --L.
Page.J..llof (co
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
PROJECI P~?1~.?2J6..
PARCEl CJ C:, Z
_.
FOlIO 00 ~qt!{4- '10 '3(:) Y
SlaTCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
16' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NORTH 1/2. OF SECTION 35.
TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E. COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
S89'2'46"E
00'
1215,83'
P.O.B. 1 .01'
S89'OO'01"W WHITE LAKE
tI.QIf;
CORPORATE PARK lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES,
AND AREAS CALCULATED ARE
BASEO ON A FIELD SURVEY Of
SECTION 35. BASIS OF' BEARING:
STATE PlANE COORDINATE SYSTE...,
FLA, EAST ZONE, '83(90.
~
iri
~
SOUTH COUNTY
REGIONAL WATER
lREANENT PlANT
170'
F.P.&:L
EASEMENT
ORB 681/1210
"
CITY GATE
COMMERCE CENTER
PHASE ONE
PLAT BOOK 41,
PAGES 6 &: 7
'.
170'
F".P,&:L
EASEl.tE:NT
ORB 681/1212
~P'O'C'
W 1/4 COR.
SECTION 35
.l@.9'OO'OI"E
e
;:::
:t'
~
S UNE Of
THE N 1/2
J'~~-~ La",,)
PR~ONAL SURVEYOR AND "'APPER
f1.0RIDA WS;ENSE N.9, l.S 4876
llilS ~I>AY OF ~ 2004.
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
I FOUO NO.:
I 00298440304
II m:
I F,P.&:L-FLORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
ORB - OfT'1ClAL RECORD BOOK
PH - PHASE
I P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
I P.O.C. - POINT OF CO......ENCE...ENT
r SOUTH UNE
~ THE ~2
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA lES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT "'VERS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER,COt.4
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ~F CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1".100' REV; 10-20-04
15' UTIUTY EASEMENT IN THE
NORTH 1 2 OF SEC 35-49-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG NO;SEC35T-AE(Pl) SHEET: 1 OF 2
...
EXHIBIT A
Page..1.iA.of (I)()
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 129 of 236
PROJECT 70 g C; :2..1
PARCEL 9b~
FOLIO 00 ~ 't'if <+YD 30 'f
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
15' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NORTH 1/2, OF SECTION 35,
TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E, COWER COUN:fY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION:
A 15-FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING IN THE NORlH 1/2 OF SECTION 35, TO\\NSHIP 49 SOUlH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COWER COUNTY, f1.OR1DA, DESCRIBED AS FOUOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER Of SAID SECTION 35. THENCE RUN N89'OO'OI"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF
1215,83 fEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF lliE NORlH 1/2 Of' SAID SECTION 35, ALSO BEING lHE Soolli LINE
OF CITY GATE COMMERCE CENTER, PHASE ONE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 41, PAGES 6 AND 7, PUBLIC
RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, flORIDA, TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING; lHENCE RUN NOO'47'14"E, FOR A
DISTANCE Of' 1050.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINES OF THE FLORIOA POWER ANO LIGHT COMPANY
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS AS RECORDED IN OFF"lCIAL RECORDS BOOK 681, PAGE 1212 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 681, PAGE 1210: THENCE RUN SSg'2'4S"E FOR A DISTANCE Of' 15.00 FEET; lliENCE RUN SOO'47'14"W,
FOR A DISTANCE OF" 1049.53 FEET ALONG A LINE 'fHAT IS 15,00 FEET EAST OF" (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES), AND PARALLEL TO, THE WEST LINE OF' SAID FLORIOA POWER ANO LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENTS; THENCE RUN S89'OO'0'"W, FOR A DISTANCE OF' 15,01 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE OF SAID
NORTH 1/2 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 15,746 SQ. Fl.. OR 0,36 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
/
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
FOR S1<ETCH
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES. INC.
SURVE'l'ING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAWN BY: JRF CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DAlE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1-.100' IREV: 10-20-04
15' unuTY EASEMENT IN THE
NORTH 1/2 OF SEC 35-49-28 PROJECT No: 020901 DWGNo:~CJ!lT-AE(Pl) ISHEET: 2 OF 2
..
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 130 of 236
EXHIBIT A
Page (~ of I~
PROJECT 70 ~q ~I
PARCEL 9/:., 3
FOLIO DO ~ 9.:0 </1../ () ~~r
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF
A 20' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN ll-lE NORTH 1/2, OF SECTION 35,
TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
J&.l 58912'46"( EXISTING 4"
;!g 170,00' PVC FORCE MAIN
.....
8""0
... HIO, 00
% N89'2'46"W
170'
F,P.&:L R/W
EASEl.tENT
ORB 681/1210
+
FOlIO NO.:
00298440304
SOUTH COUNTY
REGIONAL WATER
lREA1MENT PLANT
CITY GATE
COM"'ERCE CENTER
PHASl: ONE
PLAT BOOK 41,
PAGES 6 &: 7
~
...,.
;::
8
170' z
F.P.&:L R/W
EASEM~T
ORB 681/1212
b
~
m:
F.P.&L.-FlORIDA POWER &: UGHT CO.
ORB - OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK/F'AGE
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT Of CO......ENCE...ENT
R/W - RIGH-OF-WAY
~~~"/4 CORNER ~ElI~E 1/~ J
SECTtON 35
_ NB9'OO~ _ _
~.9L
-P,O.B.
WHI TE lAKE
CORPORATE PARI(
Sl:E SHEET 2 Of 2
FOR DESCRIPTtON
"
'OO'Ql"W
wm;
THE PARCEL BEARING, otSTANCES, AND
AREAS CAlCULATED ARE BASED ON A
FlELD SURVEY OF SECTION 35. BASIS
OF BEARING: STATE PlANE COORDINATE
SYSTE..., FlA. EAST ZONE. '83/'90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES. INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE.... FORT M'l'ERS. FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELn' ANO HANSEN, u.c DRAWN BY: ~F CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRlPl1ON: DATE: 9/13/04 SCALE: 1".100' REV: 9-17-04
20' UTILITY EASEMENT IN THE
NORTH 1 2 OF SEe 35-4li1-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWO NO:SECJST-AE(UE1) SHEET: 1 OF 2
N. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB6773)
PR SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND "'APPER
f1.0RIQA LICENSE N , LS 4876
THIS '~DAY OF 2004.
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 131 of 236
EXHIBIT A
pageJti.of l&;O
PROJECT 70 gc; 2/
PARCEL q 1t:,.3
FOLIO 00 =<9'C3'1-'ICJ?o'f
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF
A 20' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN n-!E NORn-! 1/2, OF SEC110N 35,
TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E. COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION OF A 20-FOOT STRIP OF LAND, WHOSE CENTERLINE FOLLOWS AN EXISTING
4" SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN, L YlNG IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP
49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COlLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTlON 35, THENCE RUN N89'OO'Ol"E,
FOR A DISTANCE OF 1365,90 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF SAID
SECTlON 35, ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF CITY GATE COMMERCE CENTER, PHASE
ONE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 41, PAGES 6 AND 7, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NOO'47'14"E, FOR A
DISTANCE OF 1362,60 FEET ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINES OF
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENTS AS RECORDED IN
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 681, PAGE 1212 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 681, PAGE 1210,
BOTH RECORDINGS IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN
N89'12'46"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA
POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OffiCIAL
RECORDS BOOK 661, PAGE 1210; THENCE RUN NOO"47'14"E. FOR A DISTANCE Of 20,00
FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE; THENCE RUN S89'12' 46"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 170,00 FEET
TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT; THENCE RUN SOO'47'14"W, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1382.60 FEET ALONG SAID
EAST LINES; THENCE RUN S89'OO'01"W, FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.01 FEET ALONG SAID
SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 1/2 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 30,658 SQ. FT., OR 0.70 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
SEE SHEET 1 OF' 2
FOR SKETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
SUR\IEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BL YO" SUllE 4, FORT MYmS, flORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)2n-0722 F"AX: (239)2n-7179 EMAlL: SURVE.I1NGOCOONER.COM
CUENT; GREELEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAYtN BY: ~F CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 9/13/04 SCALE: 1"..100' I REV:
20' UTIUTY EASEMENT IN THE
NORllf liz OF SEC 35-49-25 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SECJ5T-AE(UE1) I SHEET: 2 OF" 2
EXHIBIT~
Page J.ll of /5"i
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 132 of 236
PROJECT
PARCEL
FOLIO
706c;;;2./
ql",v
<:(,/7 q OOOO-(~ D
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 20' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN 'TRACT "0", WHIlE LAKE CORPORATE PARK.
OF SECTlON 35, TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
R-25,OO
L-20,59
tJ-47io'52"
, ...... CH=20,Ol'
CHB-NS7'22.' 48"W
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
.EFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)2n-0722 rAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAlL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
WENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRA~ BY: ~W CHECKED BY: J.N,W,
PARCEL DESCRlpnON: DATE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1"-200'
20' urlUTY EASEMENT IN TRACT "0"
CORPORATE PARK OF' SEC 35-49-26 PROJECT No: 020901
NORlli UNE IIttlITE LAKE
CORPORATE PARK
P.O.C.
NW COR,
TRACT "0"
TRACT "D"
FOUO NO,:
81790000180
~I
'" ~I
" z
~-f~~ I
'\S'~I
.q,~ ,,~o...o~
;r~~ ""- ~ "-
>", "'"
,
~
lL
. Z
"'0(
u2
~tJ
Vl2S
B...
,
K.E:t
C-CHORD
CDQ,-CHORD BEARING
COR. - CORNER
F.P.&:L-FlORIDA POWER &: LIGHT COMPANY
L-LENGTH
R-RAOIUS
R/W - RIGHT-Or-WAY
P.O.B.-POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
Ii - DELTA ANGLE
:;:.~~-(~-;;;~';;.~ LB.m)
PROfESSIONAL SUR\JtYOR AND MAPPER
f1.ORIDA LICEN~!,Q, 1.$ 4876
lliIS~DAY OF~ 2004.
DESCRIPTlQli Or A STRIP OF lAND, 1Ittl0SE
CENTERUNE FOLLOWS AN EXISTING 4" SANITARY
SEWER FORCE MAIN, L VlNG IN TRACT "D", WHITE
LAKE CORPORATE PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 31. PAGES 26 .& 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLER COUNTY, flORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS:
COM...ENCING AT lliE NORTH~ST CORNER OF SAID
TRACT "0", THENCE RUN N89'OO'Dl"E, A DISTANCE
OF 150.07 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE Of" SAID
TRACT "0" TO lliE POINT Of BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUE N89"OO'OI"E, A DISTANCE Or 20.01 FEET
ALONG SAID NORTH UNE; THENCE RUN SOD.
48'46"W, A OISTANCE Of' 802.05 FEET ALONG A
LINE 1l1AT RUNS PARALlEL TO THE WEST LINE or
SAID TRACT "0" TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT
CURVE Of' RADIUS 25.00 FEET; THENCE RUN A
DISTANCE Or 20.59 FEET ALONG THE ARC Of" SAID
CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A DELTA ANGLE OF
47"10'52", (CHORD DISTANCE Of' 20.01 FEET,
BEARING N87"22'48"W); THENCE RUN NOO"48'46"E,
A DISTANCE OF 800.78 FEET ALONG A UNE THAT
RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID WEST UNE TO SAID
NORTH LINE. AND TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 16,057 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.37 ACRES.
MORE OR LESS.
tiCUE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 23. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTE.... FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
REV:
DWG NO:SEC311T-At(UE2) SHEET: I Of ,
, .
EXHIBIT It
Page ) "" of (,;-0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 133 of 236
PROJECT 70't;Q ;ll
PARCEL q~ ~
FOLIO Z 17 <:;00000 2S
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF
A UTILITY EASEMENT
IN TRACT -A-, WHITE LAKE CORPORATE PARK,
OF SECTION 35, TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY. FLORIDA
I-
I
l>~
P.O,C, ~
sw 1/4 CORNER
TRACT "0" ~
--...>. ,
~--,~,00.~9"
Ch_ c__ J:J,,;"J'
-"'6'.. 1~, .J.
;S'6'O '170.
bQ~s,
('
170' FP&:L R/W
EASEMENT
$ EXISTING 4" PVC
FORCE MAIN
I
I
10'
i
TRACT "0"
/
....
( ~>~
4t.,~~.,>>9'
~...~~:~.
-<b;?'
~'t
.....
c.:. ~
F"ORCE MAIN
KEY:
r.p,&:L-FLORIOA POWER &: LIGHT CO.
ORB - OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK/PAGE
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT or COMMENCEMENT
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
R - RADIUS
L - ARC LENGlli
tJr. DELTA ANGLE
C - CHORD LENGlli
COB - CHORD BEARING
(~O-i -io,.,_
tJ A "~Ss
t., r .':~O-itJ
, ,o..,~~......
Sf!l
'IS)
I
1
/ TRACT
/ -A-
/ (SHAW
BOULEVARD)
FOLIO NO,:
81790000025
.....
......
~
......
,
..........
-~_o!.4~_
J S N. v"U<ISON (FOR THE rlRM LB677J)
P FESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORliA YCENSE N~$ 4876
THIS ~obAY OF' _ 2004.
tiQlE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURIlEY OF'
SECTION 35. BASIS OF" BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM. flA. EAST ZONE, '83/"90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONiAl BL. W.. SUITE 4, FORT MYERS. FlORIOA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIl.; SURVE'l1NGGCOONER.COM
CUENT: GftEELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ~F CHEa<ED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DATE: 9/1a/04 SCALE: 1".10' REV: 11/17/04
UTY. EASEMENT OF TRACT "A", WHITE LAKE
CORPORATE PARK OF SEC 35-49-211 PRo.JECT No: 020901 DWO No:SEC311T-Af:(UEJ) SHEEr: 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT -As-
pag...12.2 of I ~
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Pa.9l}. 134 of 236
PROJECT 70 l:S'1 2./
PARCEl 9 t:.!)
FOlIO _'6/79DOCJO..Q ~~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF
A UTILITY EASEMENT
IN TRACT .A., WHIlE LAKE CORPORATE PARK,
OF SECTION 35, TWP 49 S, RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
DESCRIPTION;
A PARCEL OF' LAND IN TRACT "A", wHITE LAKE CORPORATE PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 31, PAGES 26 & 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT ll-lE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "D", OF SAID WHITE LAKE
CORPORATE PARK, THENCE RUN 171.83 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO
THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,700.79 FEET, THROUGH A DELTA ANGLE OF 03'38'43",
(CHORD DISTANCE OF' 171.80 FEET, BEARING SOUTH 60'00'26" EAST) ALONG THE
NORTHERL Y RIGHT-OF -WA Y LINE OF AN ACCESS ROAD AS SHOWN IN ROAD PLAT 3,
PAGES 6-15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; ll-lENCE RUN NORTH 00'47'44" EAST A DISTANCE OF 0.02 FEET TO ll-lE
SOUTHERL Y LINE OF TRACT "D", SAID MflTE LAKE CORPORATE PARK; THENCE RUN
20.59 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND ll-lE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE
LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, THROUGH A DELTA ANGLE OF 47'10'52", (CHORD
DISTANCE OF' 20,01 FEET, BEARING SOUTH 87'22'48" EAST), SAID LINE ALSO BEING A
BOUNDARY LINE OF TRACT "A", SAID WHITE LAKE CORPORATE PARK; THENCE RUN
SOUTH 00"48'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.63 FEET TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED ACCESS ROAD TO A POINT ON A NON TANGENT CURVE TO
THE RIGHT; THENCE RUN 22.47 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID NON TANGENT CIRCULAR
CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,700.79 FEET, THROUGH A DELTA ANGLE OF 00'28'36",
(CHORD DISTANCE OF 22.47 FEET, BEARING NORTH 62'04'05" WEST) ALONG SAID
NO~THERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 68.70 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
FOR SKETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOOA lE5, INC.
SUR\'E't1NO AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL 9L VD" SUiTt 4. FORT MYERS, F1.0RIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAlL: SUR't1::'t'INGGCOONER,CQt.t
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, u.c DR,6.v.w BY: .RF CHEa<ED BY: J.N. W.
PARCEl. DESCRIPll0N: DATE: 9/18/04 SCALE: 1".100' I REV:
UTY. EAsatENT Of' lRACT "A", WHITE LAKE
CORPORATE PARK OF" SEC .'55-49-26 PRo.JECT No: 020901 DWO NO:SECJ5T-AE(UEJ)I SHEET: 2 OF" 2
EXHIBlT-A-
page...!1:.f. of ,r;7:}
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 135 of 236
PROJECT .Jof5 <1 J-)
PARCEl ~~f...
FOLIO 7" ~q!>-t>@,-~g'
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF
AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN TRACT 11, TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER. PHASE 2,
OF SECnON 35, T\'tP 49 S, RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PROPOSED 15' ~I W
UTILITY EASEl.tENT ~ I ~ w
" 6~
I ~~
I n.i[
15u
II ~U
~..,:
" n.
HJ
II
PARCEL TWO,
T,C.C,
PH. ONE
PB 15, PG 1
m:
COR. - CORNER
F,P.&:l. - flORIDA PO'M::R '" UGHT CO,
R/W - RIGHT-Of'-WAY
T.C.C. - TOllGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER
PB - PLAT BOOK
PC - PAGE
PH. - PHASE
P-<O.B. - POINT OF' BEGINNING
P.O.C, - POINT OF' COMMENCEMENT
1~.02
II P,O.B.
"
II
I I
INTERSTATE 75
lRACT 11
T.C.c.
PH. 2
P8 Ill, PC 24
~
~
z
P.O,B.
NE COR.
mACT 11.
T.C.C. PH. 2
mACT "0"
T.C.C.
PH. 3
170'
F.P,&:L.
E''''SEMENT
/
~.01'
N811158 111-E
I I
FOlIO NO,:
76885050568
mACT 18
T.C,C.
PH. 3
mACT 17
T.C.C.
PH. 3
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2
FOR DESCRIPTION
tiQIE;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY Of'
SECTION 35. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINA TE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/,90,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT M't'ERS. A.ORIDA 33912
PHONE: (230)277-0722 FAX: (230)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE'Y1NGDCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. U.C DRAWN BY: ..RF CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DAlE: 8/27/04 SCALE: 1"-100' REV: 10-20-04
AN ACCESS EASEMENT OF mACT 11,
T,C,C. PH 2 or SEC 35-411-26. PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:SEC35T-AE(AE1) SHEET: 1 OF 2
~--
JAM N, ~LKISON (F'OR THE FIRM LB6773)
PRO SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
flORIDA UCENSE NO. LS 4876
THIS ~AY OF' ~ 2004.
EXHIBIT A
page~Of II)C>
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 136 of 236
PROJfCT~g7 ;tl
PARCfL~
FOI.. 10 7" ~ ''is 6-
~S-~ 15
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF
AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN TRACT 11, TOLlGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE 2.
OF SECTION 35, n\P 49 S, RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION:
A PARCEL LYING IN TRACT 11, TOlLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE 2, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOl< 18,
PAGE 24, PUBlIC RECORDS OF COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOlLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORlliEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 11, THENCE RUN NORlli 87'55'12" WEST FOR A
DISTANCE OF 85.02 F'EET AlONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF" INTERSTATE 75 TO A UNE niAT IS
8S FEET WEST OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES), AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF A 170-FOOT
flORIDA POWER & UGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; lliENCE RUN SOUlli 00'46'58" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF
469,63 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL UNE; lliENCE RUN NORTH 89'56'16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 85.m
FEET ALONG A LINE THAT IS A EASTERLY EXTENSION Of niE SOUlli LINE OF' PARCEL TWO, TOLLGATE
COMMERCIAL PHASE ONE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK lIS. PAGE 1, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COlLIER COUNTY.
flORIDA; THENCE RUN NORTH 00'413'58" EAST FOR A DISTANCE Of 466.45 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE Of"
SAID 170-FOOT flORIDA POWER &: LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT TO lliE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE Of
INTERSTATt 75 AND lliE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 39,784 SO. FT., MORE OR LESS
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
FOR SKETCH
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A TES, INC.
SURVE'I1NO AND MAPPING
3900 COlONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.C0t.4
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: .RF CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL OESCRlPl1ON: DAlE: 8/27/04 SCAlE: NA R~
AN ACCESS EASEMENT OF TRACT 11,
r.c.c. PH 2 OF SEe 35-49-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DW'G NO:SEC35T-AE(AE7) SHEET: 2 OF' 2
EXHlB\T A -
~o , t;""V
pag.~of
P ROJE CT
PARCEL
FOLIO
Agenda Item No, 10C
May 10, 2005
70.g- ~13~7 of 236
7(,(,
1t.,/~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION "ELL NO. 1
IN mE NW 1/4 Of SECll0N 2, TWP 50, S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
P.Q,C.
N, 1/4 CORNER
OF SEC, 2 Z
NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC.:.. 2 -'\.r _...l
1"- 777.00'
: w S87'lS'31"W
. I ~
I() '> "
<'I <. II)
...: I f'l
~ I g
I Vl
P,Q,B. I
BECK BL \10.
N 89"31'25- E
180,00'
~
PROPOSED 20'
UTILITY
EAS<UEN~
b
o
d
co
~
. .
glij
g~
-8
L\J !StY:
P.O.B. - POINT Of BEGINNING
P,O.C, - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
.
10
.W'"
.ix1
8~
~o
z
en
PROPOSED
PRODUCTION
DESCRIPTIO"!; ~~~M~~'T 1 UTILITY
A PARCEL IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: "
120,00.
S 89'31 '25- W
COMMENCING AT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2, THENCE RUN S 87'15'31" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 777.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2;
THENCE RUN S 00'28'35" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 121.25 FEET TO THE POINT OF' BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUE S 00'28'.35" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 100,00 FEET; THENCE RUN S 89'31'25" W
FOR A DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE RUN N 00'28'35" W FOR A DISTANCE OF >40.00 FEET;
THENCE RUN S 89'3"25" W FOR A OISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE RUN N 00'28'35" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE RUN N 89'31'25" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 180.00 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 15,600 SQUARE FEET or 0.36 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
liQIt;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING; STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTD.4, f1.A. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVE'I1NG AND MAPPING
J900 COLONIAL BL W,. SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (2J9)277-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAIL.: SURVEYlNGOCOONER,CQM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC ORA.,.,. BY: ~M CHECKED BY: J,N. W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: Vof:LL NO.1 DATE: 7/111/04 SCALE: 1'-60'
TEMP, CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN tHE
HW 1 4 OF SEe 2-150-28 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:
~.
---- -------~-
S N. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB677J)
SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
<>RIOA UCENSE N~ l.S 4876
THIS~DAY OF' ~2004.
EXHIBIT A
Page~ of 11\0'
PROJECT
PARCEL
FOLIO
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 138 of 236
7o'6C(;z.,
q{.,t..
H/IJ
.
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF.Ii UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION JrELL NO" f
IN lliE NW 1/'" OF SECTION 2, TWP 50, S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
OF SEe, 2 ,2
NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEe..:... 2+ _.71-
"'- 777.00'
I S87'15'J1"W
!
I
I w
I .
. I ~
It) '> .
"!~ ~
Nib
N 0
I.&J r II)
. I
b ~ I
o.
d ~ I
'If' 8 I m:
120,00' I P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
(f) P.O.C. - POINT OF COM"'ENCEMENT
_J.v-.J
P.O.B,
BECK BLVD.
N 89"31'25" E
:J: 60,00'
PROPOSED 20'
U TlUTY
EASEMENT
.
. U)
8!'
~~
8
z
60,00'
S 89'31'25- W
P,O.C.
N. t /4 CORNER
L'
~~
J.
DESCRIPTION:
A PARCEL IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COU~TY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION. 2, THENCE RUN S 87"15'31" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 777.00 FEET ALONG lHE NORTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2;
llIENCE RUN S 00'26'35" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 221,25 fEET; lHENCE RUN S 69'31'25" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF Br::GINNING; THENCE CONTINUE S 89'.31'25" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET: llIENCE RUN N 00'28'.35" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE
RUN N 89'31'25" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S 00'28'35" E fOR A DISTANCE
OF 40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2.400 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
l!=~~-';~~E-;'-'~ LBon3J
~~L SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORIDA_I,ICENSE NO,.,l..SnS78
llilS f::!..."1rAY OF ~2004.
tiQIE;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BI\SIS OF' BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINI\TE SYSTE..., FLA. EAST ZONE, 'e3i9D.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCI A lES. INC.
SUR~NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAlL: SUR\IEYINGOCOONER,COM
ClIENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRA\\N BY: JNId CHECI<ED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEl DESCRIPTION: WELL NO, 1 DAlE: 7/20/04 SCALE: 1"-30' IREV: 10/20/04
PRODUCTtON WElL UTtLlTY EASE"'ENT _
IN THE NW 1i4 OF' SEC 2-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWO No: (PW-21 -~I SHEET: 1 OF' 1
EXHIBIT A
Page I ~ of I t:;V
Agenda Item No.1 DC
May 10,2005
Page 139 of 236
PROJECT ?O~c, '7-1
PARCEL 7 {, 7
FOLIO ~/~
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 30' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECllON 2, TWP 50, S,
RGE 26 E. COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
P.O.C.
N, 1/4 CORNER
NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC~ ~ SEC. ~)7
~.- 777.00'
I w S8T1S'31HW
~<~~
, 1 co
;:::: I ~
- 0
P.O.B. 180.00' I ~
-_Jly-_J
~>-
I<
(.?:lC
-I
-llL
~o
I
0::1-
~~
00::
Q..>-~
<zz
O<W
_Q..::t
O::::tw
go~
lLUw
BECK BLVD.
SB9'31'25"W
374.54'
8~
'U)
~~
S'l
8
z
~
.
:3b
~~
8~
(IJ
373.84'
I
L-
IS.EY:
P.O.B. - POINT OF" BEGINNING
P.O,C. - POINT Of" COMMENCEMENT
NB9"31'25"E
PROPOSED 20'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
----'V-
DESCRIPTION:
A STRIP OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of' SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLYER COUNTY. FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;
COMMENCING AT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION. 2. THENCE RUN S 87'15'31" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 777.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2;
THENCE RUN S 00'28'''5" E FOR A DISTANCE Of 171,25 FEET; THENCE RUN S 69'3"25" W fOR A
DISTANCE OF 180.00 fEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE S 69'31'25" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 373,84 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT; THENCE RUN S 00'50'5.3" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET ALONG
SAID LINE: THENCE RUN N 69'.3"25" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 374,54 FEET; THENCE RUN N
00'28'35" W FOR A DISTANCE OF .30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 11,225.70 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.26 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
-~- .- -_J~____
JA N. 'MLKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB6773)
P SSlONAL SUR\lEYOR AND MAPPER
f1. Rlp~ ~1CF.:NSE Np, 1.5 4876
ll-lIS ~DAY OF ~2004. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVOINOAND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BL W., SUITE of, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)2n-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAIL.: SURVEYlNGCCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ..NY CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRlPllON: DATE: 7/20/04 SCAlE: 1"-30'
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCnON EASEMENT
IN lliE NW 1 4 OF SEe 2-50-28 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: T _
tiQJI;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULArro ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY OF"
SECTION 11, BASIS OF BEARING: STArr PLANE
COORDINA TE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
REV: 10/20/04
- SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
pagenLof / {"a
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 140 of 236
PROJECT 701; c; J.I
PARCEl_ 7" 7
FOLIO _ 101/ A
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 20' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, T'W 50, S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY. FLORIDA
1-)-
::x: <
o~
-I
-II>..
Odo
,
crl-
~~
Ocr
0.)-1-
<z2:
Cl<W
-a.:::;;
O::::::;;w
30~
I>..Uw
J:.
. 0
"'0
It) ,
" 0
ON
kO
~
I
375.00'
.V
NB9'31'2S-E
P,O.C,
N, 1/4 CORNER
OF SEC. 2 2
NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC..! -'\r- _.A
1"- 777,00'
r ~ S87'15'J1"W
I(")
. l I")
to >.
N<:: co
. 1 N
BECK BLVD. 0 I b
N 0
S89"31'2S-W
P.O,S. 180.00' I Vl
- - -./I, r _ J
. J: v
~~
N10
S'4
o
o
Z
374.54'
t~
rW
/.
W:
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
DESCRIPTIOlt
A STRIP OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 QF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLldER COUNlY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION' 2, THENCE RUN S 67'15'J1" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 777,00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF TI-lE SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2;
THENCE RUN S 00'28'35" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 201.25 fEET; THENCE RUN S 89'Jl'25" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 180.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE S 89'31'25" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF J74.54 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF A flORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT; THENCE RUN S 00'50'53" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 20,00 FEET ALONG
SAID LINE; THENCE RUN N 89'JI'25" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 375.00 FEET; THENCE RUN N
00'28'35" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 7,495,40 SQUARE FEET or 0.17 ACRES, MORE OR lESS.
;:.-;. ~':~~mE;:'R~ Ul""1
PRJ~~ONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlOR~A U~ENSE~O.jS 4878
ll-l'S'~DAY ~ 2004.
liQJI;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/'90.
THIS rs NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SUR\FI1NO AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)2n-0722 FAX: (2J9)2n-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGGCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAVtN BY: ~M CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRlPlION: DATE: 7/20/04 SCAlE: 1"-30' IREV: 10/20/0.
20' UTIUTY EASEMENT IN ll-lE
NW 1 /~ OF SEC 2-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: Cm.-2) -, SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIB\T ~
p.g.~of I t;i
Agenda Item No, 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 141 of 236
PROJECT
PARCEL
FOLIO
70$ '1 ;( /
7b~
II /,14 ~
I
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 2
IN THE NW 1/4 Of" SECTlON 2, TWP 50, S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, R.ORIDA
lr= ~ p,Q,e,
. NW CORNER OF
~ 8 SEe, 2 BECK BLVD,
10 Ifi
o .....
o .....
VI
PROPOSED
PRODUCTION
WELL NO'!- '
UnLlTY PROPOSED 20
EASEMENT UTILITY
S89"52'OO"E EASEMENT r;/
------- . E
95,00' g
c:i
.".
DESCRIPTlO~;
I
I
,
(
N
U
w
VI
LaJ
Z
::i
l-
V!
~
....
lO
01
fJ8
$s!
~...
8
z
. lJ:
~8
010
~ p
8
VI
A PARCEL IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID SECTION 2, THENCE RUN S
00'50'44" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 115.00
FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
SECTION 2; THENCE RUN S 89'52'00" E
FOR A DISTANCE OF 95.00 FEET; THENCE
RUN S 00'08'00" W FOR A DISTANCE OF
40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE RUN S 69'52'00" E FOR A
DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET: THENCE RUN S
.00'08'00" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 10.00
'fEET; THENCE RUN S 89'52'00" E FOR A
DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S
00'08'00" W FOR A DISTANCE OF' 130.00
FEET; THENCE RUN N 89"52'00" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 100,00 FEET; THENCE RUN N
00'08'00" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 140,00
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 15,760 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.36
ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
P.O.S,
a:::
(j
100.00'
N89.S2'OO.W
ISQ:
C.R, - COUNTY ROAO
P.D.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT OF COMMENCEl.tENT
J;.-~.<>';;-~o;n:;,,;;;~ Lao",)
PR~i~~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlOlllDA LICENSE NQ. ~ 4876
llils'2~ DAY OF~, 2004.
l:lQIE:
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON " F"IELD SURVEYOr
SECl10N 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDlNA TE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST lONE. '83(90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. .C ER AND ASSOCI A TES. INC.
SUR\JE'tlNG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLW" SUllE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)2n-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAlL: SURVE'Y'INGGCOONER,COM
CUENT: CAttLEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: ..HM CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
PARCEl. DESCRIPTION; WElL NO.2 DATE: 7/19/04 SCALE: 1"-60'
TEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN lliE
NW 1 4 OF SEC 2-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:
REV: 10/20/04
- SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT A
Page 13, of I 5"U
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 142 of 236
PROJECT --21),.'0 C; 21..
PARCEl :~ q
FOLIO '/J =-
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION FELL NO" 2
IN lHE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TWP 50, S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUN'lY, FlORrDA
I ""--
~ P.O.C.
NW CORNER OF
.
::! SEC, 2
~~....
C! ~
It) b
::: 0
I/)
BECK BLVD,
L'
~~
J.
\ S 89"52'00. E
\~---------------
( 95.00' P.O,B,
I w~
I · 8
g .
N I..... . S!
u ~ ~
w m 0
I/) 0
~ ~ z
::J U
l-
I/)
~
60,00'
~ PROPOSED 20'
.. UTILITY
88 EASEMENT
~~~ -
o
o
I/)
60,00'
N 89"52'00. W
DESC~IPTIOIt
A PARCEL IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP" 50 SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS F"OLLOWS:
KEY:
C.R. - COUNTY ROAD
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
-~---- ------------
J N. WILKISON (FOR THE FIRM LB6773)
P SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORIQA LICENSE Nq. I,S 4876
llilS ~1)A Y OF" t.b4=... 2004.
COMMENCING AT TI-/E NORll-tWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTlON 2, ll-tENCE RUN S 00'50'44" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE RUN S 89'52'00" E
FOR A DISTANCE OF 95.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNINC: THENCE CONTINUE S 89'52'00" E
FOR A DISTANCE OF 60,00 FEET; THENCE RUN S 00'08'00. W FOR A DISTANCE OF 40,00 FEET:
TI-/ENCE RUN N 89'52'00" W FOR A DISTANCE or 60,00 FEET; TI-lENCE RUN N 00'08'00" E FOR A
DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BECINNING.
CONTAINING 2,400 SQUARE FEET, OR 0,06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
lWlE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA lED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINA TE SYSlE..., FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/'90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOClA TES, INC.
SUR\IE)1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD,. sum: 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAIL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRA~ BY: .lfM CHECKED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: WELL NO.2 DATE: 7/17/04SCAlL; 1"-30' 'REV: 10/20/04
PRODUCTION WElL UTILITY EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF SEC 2-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 OW No; ipWl\ -~ISHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT fa 0
page..l!!- of 'fi
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 143 of 236
PROJECT
PARCEl
FOLIO
7 otO q -;)./
7{;'9
If fA ~
,
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
30' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
IN lHE NW 1/4- OF SECTION 2, 1WP 50, S.
RGE 26 E. COLUER COUNlY, FLORIDA
I ~P.o.C,
NW CORNER OF
.
~ SEC. 2
'0
10
o
o
V)
KEY:
C.R. - COUNTY ROAD
P.O.B. - POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT Of" CO"'MENCEMENT
BECK BLVD.
589'52'00"E
----J\V-----r.:=-
155.00' 18
I~
P.O.B.
I.&Jg
b
o '
~~
g
Z
- 3t
.
~
'b
~
&l
I
589"52' O.E
PROPOSED 20~'1
u nUTY I
EASEMEN T
(:
N ,
U
I.&J
V)
W
Z
:J
....
V)
~
Iti
Ol
1001.75'
~
U
1001,38'
N89'52'OOW
....>-
i3~
:JJ.
~o
,
0::....
~~
00:::
Q.>-f-
<zz
O<W
-o..:::e
ll:::Ew
go~
lL.Uw
DESCRIPTION:
A STRIP OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS F"OLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF" SAID SECTION 2, THENCE RUN S 00'50'44" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF" SAID SECTION 2: THENCE RUN S 89.52'00" E
FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S 00'08'00" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN S 89'52'00. E FOR A DISTANCE OF 1001,75 FEET TO THE
WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT; THENCE RUN S
00'50'53" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE; THENCE RUN N 89'52'00" W
FOR A DISTANCE OF 1001.38 FEET: THENCE RUN N 00'06'00" E F"OR A DISTANCE OF JO,OO FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING JO,437 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.70 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~ W2.IE;
/.--- lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, ANO AREAS
- ------------------ CALCULATEO ARE BASED ON A nELD SURVEY OF
J N. v.1U<ISON (FOR THE F1R... LB6773) SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE, PLANE
P SSIONAL SURVEYOR AND "'APPER COORDINATE SYSTE..., F"lA. EAST ZONE, 83/90.
~?sR~~~~S~N~ 4~~~4. n"us rs NOT A SURVEY
~EY C. COONER AND ASSOClA TESt INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAl BLVD,. SUllE 4. FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: {23D)277-0722 FAX: {23D)2n-7179 EWAlt.: SURVEYlNGCllCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY. AND HANSEN, LtC DRAWN BY: .....,... CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
PARCEl DESCRIPT10N: DA 1E: 7/17/04 SCALE: 1"-30'
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN
THE NW 1 4 OF SEe 2-50-2lS PROJECT No: 020901 OWG No: T -1
EXHIBIT ~
page..1.ll of I ~O
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 144 of 236
PROJECT J 0'3 C; ::l./
PARCEl ?5~9
FOLIO _ tV/ fi
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TWP 50, S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA
I
7t
I
/
I
I
I
155,02' ~
N89"56'18-E
NORTH R/W LINE
P.O.B.(l)
P.0.C.(2)
SE CORNER OF
TOllGA TE COMMERCiAl
CENrrR, PHASE 2,
1'.8. 16, PGS. 23-24
TRACT 10,
TOlleA TE COMMERCIAL
CENTER, PHASE 2,
P.B. 18, PGS. 23-24 2
NOR1li UNE NW 1/4. SEC.
"
" W
11).
..,..,
'II)
E~
o
o
z
BECK BLVD.
~
~j.,
b~
lOR t3
8- d
(f) Ol
KU:
P.B. - PLAT BOOK
PG.(S) - PAGE(S)
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. - POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED
UTILITY
EASEMENT
S89'31'25-W
155,04'
P.O,B.(2)
155,04'
NB9"31'2S-E
w
.
" ..,
Nil)
Olb
COlO
010
o
Z
FlORIDA POWER & LIGHT
COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT
~
.
..,
"8 II) ,
b
cO In
m ....
~
155,0 '
S89'55'16.W
SOUTH R/W LINE
SEE SHEET 2 Of 2
F"OR DESCRIPTION
-~- - .~~~
J N. 'MLKISON (F"OR lliE FIRM LB6773)
P ESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlOR~A~CENSE ~~. 15 4878
THIS ~ :'JaAY ~ 2004.
tiQIE;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FlELD SURVEY Of
SECTION 11. BASIS OF" BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTE.... flA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
ll-f/S 'S NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIA lES, INC.
SURVE'l'ING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUllE 4, FORT MYERS, R.ORIDA 33912
PHONE: {2J9)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE'l1NGGCOONER,COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. lLC DRAWN BY: ~... CHECKED BY: J.N,W,
PARcEL DES~IPlION: DATE: 9/8/04 SCALE: 1"-30'
AN ACCESS EASEtolEHT IN THE
NW , .4 OF SEe 2-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No: A-
REV: 10/20 04
- SHEET: 1 OF 2
. ...
EXHIBIT*
Page /31 of t
PROJECT
PARCEl
FOLIO
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 145 of 236
7015q~/
~b'f
H/ft
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT
IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TWP 50, S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION OF PARCELS OF LAND IN THE NORlHWEST 1/4 Of SECTION 2,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUN'N, FlORIDA,
DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS:
(1)BEGlNNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL
CENTER, PHASE TWO, AS RECORDED IN PLAT aOOK 18, PAGES 23-24,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, fLORIDA, THENCE RUN S 00'50'53"
W FOR A DISTANCE Of 170.23 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF A F1.0RIDA
POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT: THENCE RUN S
89'31'25" W fOR A DISTANCE OF 155,04 FEET TO A LINE THAT RUNS
PARAllEL TO SAID EAST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT: THENCE RUN N 00'50'53" E fOR A DISTANCE
Of 171,35 fEET ALONG SAID LINE: THENCE RUN N 89'56'18" E fOR A
DISTANCE OF 155.02 FEET ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE Of
BECK BOULEVARD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
AND,
(2)COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL
CENTER, PHASE TWO, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 18, PAGES 23-24,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF COWER COUN'N. FlORIDA, THENCE RUN S 00'50'53"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 190,23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE
CONTINUE S 00'50'53" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 98.00 FEET ALONG SAID
EAST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-Of-WAY
EASEMENT TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE OF' BECK BOULEVARD:
THENCE RUN THENCE RUN S 89'55'16" W fOR A DISTANCE OF 155.02
FEET ALONG SAID LINE: THENCE RUN N 00'50'53" E FOR A DISTANCE OF
96.92 fEET ALONG A LINE THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE OF A
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT: THENCE
RUN N 89'31'25" E fOR A DISTANCE OF 1~5,04 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 41,580 Square Feet or 0,95 Ac.:I:.
SEE SHEET 1 OF 2
F"OR SKETCH
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVE'l1NG AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL BLVD" SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, F1.0RIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 F'AX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVE.l1NGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: OREEl.E;Y AND HANSEN, tLC DRAWN BY: .lN1oA CHECKED BY: J,N,W,
PARCEL DESCRIPTION: DAlE: 11/8/04 SCALE: REV:
AN ACCESS EASEt04ENT IN THE _
NW II. OF' SEe 2-50-215 PROJECT No: 0201i101 DWG No: ,........., " SHEET: 2 OF 2
EXHIBIT A
Page..u1.of /57/
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Pa,ge 146 of 236
PROJECT (D~c, ;;1../
PARCEl - Cj" 7
FOLIO IY /J)
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A 20' UTILITY EASEMENT
IN lHE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TWP 50, 5,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
/"-
~ P,O.C,
NW CORNER OF
.
" ~ SEC. 2
g... ~ 0
. lO
~ 8 BECK BL VO,
V)
L'
r~
J.
\ P.O.B.
t-----Jlv--_ .-
( 155.00' \oJ 8
, . ,
, ~~
C\/ 1.- ~
U ll') 0
W Ol 0
V) Z
W ci
z cj
:J
l-
V)
~
S8e"52'OO.E
10~,OO'
V
I
...... ~
DESCRIPTIO/t
A STRIP" OF LAND IN THE NORtHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COllIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOlLOWS;
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2, THENCE RUN S 00'50'44" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF' 115.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE RUN S 89'52'00" E
FOR A DISTANCE Of 155,00 FEET TO THE POINT OF' BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE S 89'52'00" E
FOR A DISTANCE OF 1002.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
RIGHT-Of-WAY EASEMENT; THENCE RUN S 00'50'53" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET ALONG
SAID WEST LINE; THENCE RUN N 69'52'00" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 1001.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N
00'06'00" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 20,298 SQUARE FEET or 0.47 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
m:
C,R, - COUNTY ROAD
P.O.B. - POINT or BEGINNING
.P.O.C. - POINT or COI.tI.lENCEMENT
I
I
I
1->-
:c~
Q,
-'I.&..
"dO
,
0:-1-
~~
00:-
0..>-1-
<zz
o<W
-0.. ~
O:-~W
go~
ll..Uw
A
1001.~5'
N8e'52'OO.W
8~
.~ ~
g
en
;;:?st ..u<r~~"'.. LB""J
PR~~~VEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORIDA LICENSE N9, L:;j 4876
THIS~D"Y Of ~ 2004.
tiQlt;
THE PARCEl SEARING, OISTANCES. AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE eASEO ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11. BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COOROINA TE SYSTE.... FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
'OilS IS NOT A SURVEY
JEFFREY C. COONER AND ASSOOA TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COlONIAL BLVD., SUITE 4, FORT MYERS, FlORIDA JJ912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7179 EMAlL: SURVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY ANO HANSEN. u.C DRAWN BY: ....M CHECKED BY; J.N. w.
PARCEl DEScRIPTION: DATE: 7/17/04 SCAlE: 1"-30' REV: 10/20/04
20' UTIUTY EASEl.tENT IN lliE
NW 1/4 OF. SEe 2-50-26 PROJECT No: 02090' DWG No: IPPL-H - SHEET: f OF 1
EXHIBIT A
page...L!:l!Lof I co
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 147 of 236
PROJECT
PARCEl
FOLIO
7 0 fie, ;1../
9'9A
N.IA
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
OF A UTILITY EASEJlENT
IN lliE NW 1/4 OF SEC110N 2, lWP 50, S,
RGE 26 E. COWER COUNTY, flORIDA
TRACT 10,
TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL
CENTER, PHASE 2,
P,B. 18, PGS. 2NJ~~ LINE NW 1/4, SEC, 2
896'. _
P,O.B. 155,02' 'j-
S89'56'18"W
15,00'
NORTH R/W UNE
lHlS IS NOT A SURVEY
AND ASSOCIA lES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
3900 COLONIAL Bl.VD., SUIlE 4, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)2n-7178 EMAIL.: SURVEYlNOOCOONER.COM
ClIENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRA~ BY: ..NM CHEa<ED BY: J.N,W.
PARCEL DESCRlPllON: DATE: 7/20/04 SCALE: 1".30'
Ul1UTY EASEMENT IN THE
NW f 4 Of' SEC 2-50-28 PROJECT No: 020901 DWG No:
I
I
I
BLVD. I
~ I
~8 I
~~ I
~~
~~
z
. llI=
15l~
Ei
BECK
NB9"31'25-E
155,04'
"
.
N~
:d~
Ot~
155,04'
589'31 '25.W
15,00'
flORIDA POWER &: LIGHT
COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT
S89"55'16.W
- SOUTH R/W UNE
W:
P,B, - PLAT BOOK
PG,(S) - PAGE(S)
P.O.B. - POINT OF" BEGINNING
P.O,C. - POINT or COMMENCEMENT
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
;--~~I,O;M-;;'~ LB'"')
p~~i:~ SURvEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORlOA UCENSE NO. ~. i'-?6
llolIS'~AYOF' ~04,
JEFFREY C.
P.O.C.
SE CORNER OF"
TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL
CENTER, PHASE 2,
P,B. 18, PGS. 23-24
DESCRIPTION:
A STRIP OF LAND IN THE NORlHWEST 1/4 OF
SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUlH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
r
COMMENCING AT lHE SOUlHEAST CORNER OF
TOLLGATE COMMERCIAL CENTER, PHASE TWO, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 18, PAGES 23-24,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, F1.0RIOA,
THENCE RUN S 89'56'18" W FOR A DISTANCE OF'
155.02 FEET ALONG lliE NORlli RIGHT-OF'-WAY
LINE OF BECK BOULEVARD TO lHE POINT OF
BEGINNING; lliENCE RUN S 00'50'53" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 171.35 FEET: lliENCE RUN N
89'31'25" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.04 rEET TO
THE EAST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT:. lliENCE RUN
S 00'50'53" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 fEET
ALONG SAID LINE; THENCE RUN S 89'31'25" W
FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.04 FEET: lHENCE RUN S
00'50'53" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 96.92 FEET TO
THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BECK
BOULEVARD; lliENCe: RUN S 89'55'16" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET ALONG SAID LINE:
THENCE RUN N 00'50'53" E FOR A DISTANCE OF
288,29 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT TO SAID NORlli
RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE; THENCE RUN N 89'56'18" E
FOR A DISTANCE Of 15.00 fEET ALONG SAID
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO lliE POINT OF" BEGINNING,
CONT"INING 7,425 Square Feet or 0.17 Ac.:t:.
IiQIE.:
lliE PARCEl BEARING, DISTANCES, AND "REAS
CALCULA TED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECTION 11, BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE .
COORDINATE SYSTEM, flA. EAST ZONE, '83/90,
REV: 10/20/04
- SHEET: 1 OF 1
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 148 of 236
EXHIBIT A
pageJ.jLof I t:;O
PROJfCT 7 () fI'{ '7 ~ I
PARCEl q 7 ~
FOLIO ~ N,IA ~
saTCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A
PERJlANENT UTILITY AND ACCESS EASEJ/ENT (S2.P)
IN THE WEST 100' OF SECTION 11. TOWNSHIP 50 S.
RANGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA
FOREST ClENN OF
NAPLES SUBDIVISION
P.O.B. PlAT BOOK 31, PAGE 94
N88'7'44"E N88' 7' 44"E
---
80.06' 40,04' l~ 4
NORTH UNE SEClION 11 ~ ~~~a
~ ~~~I~~
i )j ii III" 15<
PROPOSED PERMANENT II:: ~ CLCL
UTILITY EASEMENT m J
~ ~
Ch
Ii
cJ ~ .........----- PROPOSED TEMPORARY
I"' CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
:s: :s:
! I i~ ~
<
~ IS
- HENDERSON CREEK ~f SU~
- CA.NAl R/W (100')
! ~ ~ III
!= 40'
~
S8T2S' 49"W ~~:i!~~
SOUlli UNE SEClION 11 ~&~~!z15
--- 80,11' 40,07' ~12 ~l5lD
N87"25' 49"E CLCL2
I I I I,
PROPOSED PERMANENT .. ~ alcJ
U TILl TV '" ACCESS ~~ ~qqd
EASEMENT a::OCLCLZ
DESCR"'lIl1N or A PERt.lA.NENT UlIUTY AND ACCESS EASOlENT LYING IN THE EAST 40 FEET or THE WEST 100 FEET
or SECllON 11, TO~SHIP50 SOUlli, RANGE 28 EAST: COWER COUNTY, FlORIDA; MORE PARllCUlARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOlLOWS: . '-.if;
"!ii' ,
COMMENQNG AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER or SAID SECllON 11, lHENCE RUN N8tM7'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 60.06
FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE or SAID SECllON TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: lliENCE CONllNUING AlONG SAID
NORTH UNE N88'7'44"[, A D1STA.NCE OF 40.04 FEET TO lHE EAST UNE or THE HENDERSON CREEK CANAL
RIGHT-OF-WAY. lHENCE RUN SOO'50'44"W, A DISTANCE Of 5S05,36 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UHf TO lHE SOUTH
UNE or SAID SECTION 11: THENCE RUN S87'25'49"W, A DISTANCE Of 40.07 FEET ALONG tHE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SECllON 11: lliENCE RUN Noo'50'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 5S0!5,99 FEET ALONG A lINE THAT IS PARAllEL NTH AND
40 FEET WESlERLY Of SAID EAST UNE or THE HENDERSON CREEK CANAL RIGHT-or-WAY TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTMfING 220,220 SQUARE FEET OR 5.06 ACRES, t.4ORE OR LESS.
--~~-------
wm:.
lHE PARCEl BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A AElD SURVEY Of
SECllON 11. BASIS Of BEARING; STAlE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FtA, EAST ZONE, '83;90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
COONER &: ASSOCIATES. INC.
SURVE't1NG AND MAPPING
5870 ZIP DRIVE, FORT MYERS, nORIDA 33905
PHONE: (239)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EMAIL: SURVEVlNOOCOONER.COU
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, LiC DRAWN BY: DKT CHECKED BY: ....W
PARCEL DESCRIPnON: DATE: 04/0S/05 SCAlf: 1"-20' REV:
PERM, UllUTY at ACCESS EASEMENT IN tHE
~ST 100' Of SEC 11..50-211 PROJECT No: 030705W,A OWG NO:OJ0705WA-ESIoI SHEET: 1 OF 1
r'AMEN TOVttlSEND (FOR THE ARM LBII773)
PROFESSIONAl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FlORlD.A,UCEhSE NO. ~6476
THIS ~ DAY OF P~l/
.2~.
EXHIBIT A
page~of ,1:)0
PROJECT
PARCEL
FOLIO
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
7 0 ~lt 'lAg of 236
973
Ii/A
,
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION 01' A
PERJlANENT UTIUTY AND ACCESS EASEMENT (88.P)
IN THE WEST 100' OF SECllON 14-, TOWNSHIP 50 S,
RANGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, flORIDA
P.O.C. PROPOSED PERMANENT
UTIlITY Ie ACCESS
V NW ~ER EASEMENT
SECTION 14 P,O.8., N87'25'48"E t,
\ NOR1!!.. U~ SECTION 14 40.07' I
'I N87'2~' 4Q"E eo,l1' "\ . .1; ~J
HENDERSON CREEK ....
CANAl. R/W (100')
40' l-
ii; ~ " ~i ,
m ~
~ ~
PROPOSED PERMANENT ~
UTILITY EASEMENT '!:. ....
! ~ i5
. lDU~
~ ~ ~ ~dll
~ I !
I4l ~~~~lis
Z
::J
. ~ S87"38'OJ"W \ ~~ ........1
f\. SOUTI-I UHE SECTION 14 ~~~~~
~ . \j N87'38'OJ"E eO.l0' 40.011' . I all.! I
PROPOSED PERMANENT ~~~~qC!d
SW CORNER U Till TV Ie ACCESS n:; Il.Il.Z
SEcnON 14 EASEMENT
D~SCRfPTlON OF A PERNANENT UTIUTY AND ACCESS EASEMENT LYING IN THE EAST 40 FEET OF THE WEST 100 FEET
OF' SECllON 14, TOWNSHIP 150 SOUTI-l, RANGE 2e EASTj COWER COUNTY, flORIDA: MORE P ARTlCULARl Y DESCRIBED
AS fOlLOWS:
COItINENQNG AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N87"2t1'4V"E, A DISTANCE OF 80,U
FEET AlONG 1HE NORTH UNE OF SAID SECTION TO TI-lE POINT OF BEGINNING; 1HENCE CONTINUING AlONG SAID
NORTH UNE N87"2&'48"E, A DISTANCE OF 40,07 FEET TO 1HE EAST UN[ OF TI-lE HENDERSON CREEK CANAl.
RIGHT-Of-WAY: lHENCE RUN SOO"l50'''"W, A DISTANCE OF 5367.48 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE TO THE SOUTH
UNE OF SAID SECTION 14: THENCE RUN S87'J8'OJ"W, A DISTANCE OF 40,08 FEET ALONG THE SOU1H UNE OF SAID
SECTION 14: THENCE RUN NOO"l50'''"E, A DISTANCE OF' 15J57,J1 FEET AlONG A UNE THAT IS PARAU..EL WITH AND
40 FEET WESTERLY Of SAID EAST UNE Of THE HENDERSON CREEK CANAl RIGHT-Of-WAY TO THE POINT Of'
BEGINNING,
COtUAINING 2'4,280 SQUARE FEET OR 4,82 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
--~~~-----
WUE;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CAlCULA'Im ARE BASED ON A AElD SURVEY OF'
SECTION 14, BASIS OF' BEARING: STAlE PLANE
COORDlNAlE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83/'90.
nons IS NOT A SURVEY
COONER & ASSOCIA TESt INC"
SUR'oIEYlNG AND MAPPING
5670 ZIP DRI'olE, FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 33905
PHONE: (2,39)277-0722 FAX: (239)277-7179 EM All.: SUR'oIEYlNGOCOONER,COM
CLIENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. u.c DRAWN BY: DKT CHECKED BY: JNW
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: DATE; 04/05/05 SCALE: 1"-20' REV:
PERM. unulY Ie ACCESS EASEMENT IN THE
WEST 100' Of' SEC 14-e<l-28 PROJECT No: OJ0705W.A OWG No:OJ0705WA-E!IN SHEET: 1 OF 1
2005.
DARM:N TOWNSEND (FOR THE FIRM LB8n3)
PROFESSIONAl. SURvEYOR AND MAPPER
f1..ORID"t\.~CENSE NO. LS 8478
THIS ~ DAY OF AM.lC".
EXHIBIT It
Page~of I ')C'
Agenda Item No, 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 150 of 236
PROJECT
PARCel
FOLIO
7o'1Cf:z...;
Dr74
IV/A-
.
P.O.C.
NW CORNER
SECTION 1((_
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO, 7
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF'
SECTION 11, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E
COLUER COUNTY, flORIDA
100'
HENDERSON CREEK
CANAL R/W
/ ::,NE SECllON 11
,.7
~g
, ~
~'"
0<'1
&'l
,
w
Z
::J
L~
~~
J.
N88'7'44"S _ _'00,10'
.;..
~
0:
W
I
I
~ I
li
t.l
NB7'M'59'E \
22.03'
P,O,B.
~
~8
~.
8~
z
,
- :
8Q
dl"
100
~
22'
W:
C,R. - COUNTY ROAD
P,O.B.-POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
22.03'
SB7"54'5S"W
DESCRIPTION A PARCEL LYING IN THE SOUlliWEST 1/4 OF TI-lE NORTI-lWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TO'ft1llSHIP 50
SOUlli,'RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, f1.ORIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, THENCE RUN N88"17'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 100.10
FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE Of' SAID SECTION TO THE EAST UNE OF THE HENDERSON CREEK CANAL
RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN SOO"5Q'''''''"W, A DISTANCE OF 2348.60 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOO'SO'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 80,00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN
S67'54'S9"W. A DISTANCE OF 22.03 FEET; THENCE RUN NOO'50'44"E, A OISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET AlONG A UHE
RUNNING PARAU.EL TO SAID EAST UNE: THENCE RUN N87"54'59"E, A DISTANCE OF 22.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 1.322 SQUARE FEET OR 0.03 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~......-- J ..vJ--
--- -----------------
JAM N. WILKISON (FOR lliE FIR'" LB6773)
PR SlONAl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
flORIDA UCENSE N~7&. 4876
THIS .1.!!: DAY OF 2005,
liQIE;
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A AElD SURVEY Of
SECTION 11, BASIS Of BEARING: STATE PlANE
COORDINAll:: SYSll::M, f1.A, EAST ZONE, '83/90.
lHlS IS NOT A SURVEY
COONER &- ASSOC1A TES, INC.
SuRVIMNG AND MAPPING
3670 ZIP DRIVE. FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 33903
TEU;:PHONE: 239.277.0722 FAX; 239.277,7179 EMAlL: 8URVEYING@COONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, U.C DRAWN BY: JRF
PARCEL DESCRIPTION; WEU. NO.7 DATE: 8/26/04
PRODUCTION M:u. UllUTY EASEMENT IN THE
SW 1/4 AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 02090l
CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
SCALE: 1"-30' IREV: 3/30/05
DWG No: SEC11W-TCE(P7)ISHEET: 1 OF" 1
EXHIBIT A
Page J!:CL of , C;-O
PROJECT
PARCEL
F OLI 0
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10. 2005
Page 151 of 236
7o~9;Z1
97S--
Jy ) J4.
.
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 9
IN THE NW 1/4 AND THE SW 1/4
OF SECTION ", TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
S87'42'01"W ,
.;;,i;j'
iti I
'"
0: I
d I
"
,. 1&1 ~~
~8 g~
~~ ~~ J.
z
22'
100'
HENDERSON CREEK
CANAL R/W
~
P.O.B. :::J
22.03' .1 t
N87'42'01"E I a::
~'r""
~~
.~
~~
8
z
ISE:I::
C.R. - COUNTY ROAD
P,O.B.-POlNT or BEGINNING
P.O.C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
..
P,O.C.
SW CORNER
SECTION 11 ~
" i"-
IS UNE SECTION 11
NI37~25'49.~ 100-'13'
DESCRIPll0N A PARCEL LYING IN 'THE NORTHWEST '14 OF lliE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COlliER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT lliE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, THENCE RUN N87'25'4V"E, A DISTANCE OF 100.18
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE or SAID SECTION TO THE EAST UHE or THE HENDERSON CREEK CANAl
RIGHT-or-WAY; THENCE RUN NOO'50''''''''"e:, A DISTANCE Of 1620,43 FEET AlONG SAlO EAST UNE TO lllE POINT OF'
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO'!50'44"E, A DISTANCE or 100,00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN
S87'42'01.W, A DISTANCE OF" 22,03 FEET; lllENCE RUN SOO'50''''''''"W, A DISTANCE OF" 100.00 FEET ALONG II UNE
RUNNING PARAlLEL TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN N87'42'01"E, A DISTANCE OF' 22.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2203 SQUARE FEET OR 0.05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
--~-__d:~_____
JA S N. V.1U<ISON (FOR 1l1E FIRM LB6773)
PR FESSlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FtORIQA UCENSE N~(,. 4876
THIS u..r OA Y Of 2005.
wm:
lliE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON II FIELD SURVEY or
SECTION 1\, BAstS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDlNATr SYSTEM, FtA, EAST ZONE, '83,1"90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
COONER Be ASSOCIA TES, lNG,
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
5670 ZIp DRIVE, FORT MVE1'lS, FLORIDA 33905
1'El..EPHONE: 2Sg.277.0722 FAX: 239,277.7' 7g EMAlL: 8URVEYlNGOCOONER,COM
CUENT; GREELEY AND HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: J.N.W.
PARCEL DESCRIPl1ON: WElL NO, 9 DATE: 8/26/04
PRODUCTION WEU. UTIUTY EASEMENT IN THE
NW '/4 OF THE SW 114 OF SEe 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901
CHECKED BY: J.N.W,
SCALE: 1".30' I REV: 3/30/05
DWG No: SECl1W-TCE(PD)ISHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT...A-
PageJ!i.f:.. of t t;D
PROJECT
PARCEl
F OLI 0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
7Pall! if'~! 236
'17{,
fI/,/A
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 8
IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF
SECTION 11, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
S67'32'1S"W
22.04'
I
~ I
5 I
~
~.
08
~g
1&1
. ~
~~
COg
Z
L~
~~
1.
22'
P.O.c.
SW CORNER
SECTION 11 ~
100'
HENDERSON CREEK
CANAL R/W
22,04' ( P.O.B.
N87"32'18"E
~ >
;"
b-
1018
8=
2:
""
z
:1
~
D:
1&1
..;>
I'-
NB7'25'49"E
\ -
100.IS' -,-;;
~
C.R. - COUNTY ROAD
P.O,B.-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C,-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
S UHE SECTION 11
DESCRIPTION A PARCEL LYING IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE SOUlliWEST 1/4 Of SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUlli, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
C0t.4MENClNG AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Of SAID SECTION 11, lHENCE RUN N87'25'411"E. A DISTANCE OF 100.1S
FEET ALONG THE SOUlH UNE OF SAID SECTION TO THE E"'ST UNE OF THE HENDERSON CREEK CANAL
RIGHT-Of-WAY: THENCE RUN NOO'50'''''''"E, A DISTANCE OF 688.17 FEET "'LONG S....D EAST UNE TO THE POINT Of
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE Noo'50'''''''"E, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN
S87'32'18"W, A DISTANCE Of 22.04 FEET: lliENCE RUN SOO~'''''''"W, A DISTANCE Of 80.00 FEET ALONG A UNE
RUNNING PARAu..El TO SAID EAST LINE: THENCE RUN N87'32'18"E, ... DISTANCE Of' 22.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 1,322 SQUARE FEET OR 0.03 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~ tmIE;
---- - ~--- ~C~~~ ~~R~:~S~AN~~~u~~S Of
JAME . 'MLl<ISON (FOR lliE FlRM LB6773) SECTION 11. BASIS Of" BEARING: ST...n: PLANE
PROf'I SlONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER COORDINAn: svsn:..., fl..... EAST ZONE, 'S.3/,90.
~~I~~~F~ 4~~5. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
COONER 8: ASSOCIA TES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
5670 ZIp DRIVE, FORT MYERS, FLoRIDA 33905
TEU;;PHONE: 239.277.0722 FAX: 239.277.7179 EMAlL: SURVEYlNGItCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY "'NO HANSEN, LLC DRAWN BY: JRF
PARCEl. DESCRIPTlON: VtEU. NO.8 DATE: 9/8/04
PRODUCTION WELL UTlUTY EASEMENT IN THE
SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 Of' SEC 11-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901
CHECKED BY: J.N,W,
SCALE: 1"-30' 'REV: 3/30/05
DWG No: SEC11W-TCE(pdSHEET: I Of' 1
EXHIBIT It-
Page~of 15'"0
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 153 of 236
PROJECT 70 iO C, '2 I
PARCfl_ q 77 -
FOLIO _ tt,/ J4 -=
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 12
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4
OF SECnON 14, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E
COLUER COUNlY. FLORIDA
P.O.C.
NW CORNER
SECllON 14 \~
Nl!r25'49"E
r- N UNE SECTION 14
100.16' L _),._
t,
tW
J.
i'"
100'
HENDERSON CREEl<
CANAL R/W
3l;
~'O;)
. lQ
o .
1001
~18
.
~
~
0:
W
N1l7'27'23:E \
22,u4'
p,O,B.
iO
01
a:
cJ
,
I
I
I
foJ ~
i~ ~I
22'
ISEX::
C.R, - COUNTY ROAD
P.O,B.-POlNT OF BEGINNING
P.O,C.-POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
22.0''-
S87'2T23"W
DESCRIPl101j A PARCEl L VlNG IN THE NORTHM!:ST 1/4 OF" THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECl10H 14, TOYotlSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, f1.0RIDA:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF" SAID SECTION 14, THENCE RUN N87'25'49"E, A DISTANCE OF" 100,18
FEET ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID SECTION TO THE EAST UNE OF THE HENDERSON CREEK CANAL
RIGHT-OF-WA Y: THENCE RUN SOO'50'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 869.68 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE TO THE POINT Of
BEGINNING, THENCE CONllNUE Soo'50'''''''"W, A DISTANCE OF' 110.00 F"EET ALONG SAID EAST UN!; THENCE RUN
S87'27'~3"W, A DISTANCE OF 22,04 FEET; THENCE RUN Noo':50'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET ALONG A UNE
RUNNING PARALl.EL TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN N67'27'23"E, ^ DISTANCE OF' 22.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF"
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 1,322 SQUARE FEET OR 0.03 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
:;:;;.- ~i~o;;;;;AR; IBm,)
PRO~~:~~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
ftORIQA .UCENSE Ng. .L.S 4676
THIS f.1:J:: DAY OF" ~ 2005.
wm;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A F1ELD SURVEY OF
SECllON 14, BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FlA. EAST ZONE, '63190,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
COONER EX ASSOCIATES. INC,
SURVEYINO AND MAPPING
5870 ZJp DRIVE, FORT MYIER&, FLORIDA 33&05
TELEPHONE: 239.277.0722 FAX: 239.277.7179IiMAIL: SURVEYlNOecOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN, Il.C DRAM-/ BY: JRF'
PARCEL DESCRlPl1ON: M:1l. NO, 12 DATE: 8/12/04
PRODUCTION YtUl. UTIUTY EASEMENT IN THE
NW {/. OF THE NW 1/4 OF' SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020;01
CHECKED BY: J.N.W.
SCAlE: 1"-30' REV: 3/31/05
DWG ND:sEC14W-TCE(PI2 SHEET: 1 OF I
EXHIBIT A
Page.J:t1.Of I~(.)
PROJECT
PARCEl
F OLI 0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 154 of 236
70tfc;~1
'17Q
~/A ~
P.O.C.
NW CORNER
SECTION 14
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 18
IN THE SW 1/4 Of THE NW 1/4 OF SECnON 14, 1WP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
---
Nf!Z.'25' 49"E
100.18'
f': N U~E SECTION 14
w"l ~
. , :J
:"'
. ID
~p!
~!!! .
589"09'16"[ \
22.00' P,O.B.
~
0:
W
100'
HENDERSON CREEK
CANAL R/W
22'
t~
~W
J.
u:;
'"
,...
:-
!~
~
;
~i
Ii
d
22.00'
N89W'lS.W I
,
DESCRIPTION A PARCEl LYING IN lllE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF lliE NORlliWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TO'MIISHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
KO::
C,R. - COUNTY ROAD
P,O,B.-PotNT OF BEGINNING
P.O,C.-POlNT OF COMMENCEMENT
R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY
COMMENONG AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of SAID SECTION 14, lllENCE RUN N87'25'4S"E, A DISTANCE OF 100.18
FEET ALONG lHE NORlli UNE OF SAID SECTION TO lllE EAST UNE OF THE HENDERSON CREEK CANAl
RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN S00'50'''''''"W, A DISTANCE OF 1679,65 FUT ALONG SAID EAST UNE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOO'SO'''''''"W, A DISTANCE OF' 100,00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE: THENCE RUN
N69"09'IS"W, A DISTANCE OF 22,00 FEET: THENCE RUN Noo'5Q'''''''"E, A DISTANCE OF 100,00 FEET ALONG A UNE
RUNNING' PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE: lliENCE RUN SS9"OS'lS"E. A DISTANCE OF 22,00 FEET TO THE POINT OF"
BEGINNING.
CO~NTAlNING 2j:SOUARE FEET OR 0.05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
-- ------------------
JA S N. 'MLKISON (FOR THE FlRM LB6773)
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.0RIDAUCENSE N% ~ 4878
llilS L!.:f: DAY OF 2005.
liCm;
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULA 1m ARE BASED ON A AElD SURVEY OF
SECTION \4, BASIS OF' BEARING: STAn:: PlANE
COORDINA TE SYSTEM, F1A EAST ZONE, '83/"90.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
COONER & ASSOGIA TES, lNG,
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
15670 Zip DRIVE;, FORT MY1!:R5, FLoRIO'" 33905
TEU!PHONF. 239.277.0722 FAA: 2.39.277.7179 EMAI~ SURVEYlNG.CODNER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LlC DRAWN BY: J.N,W,
PARCEL DESCRIPnON: WElL NO, 13 DAlE: 8/12/04
PRODUCTION WElL. UlJUTY EASEMENT IN THE
sw 114 Of THE NW 1/4 OF' SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901
CHECKED BY: J,N,W,
SCALE: 1"-30' REV: 3/31/05
OWG NO:SEC14W-Ta:(PI3) SHEET; 1 Of 1
EXHIBIT A
Page.l..!:i!lof I &;V
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 155 of 236
PROJECT
PARCEL
FOlIO
7tJ '(;q~1
979
N/A
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION "ELL NO. 28
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S,
RGE 26 E, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
NS9'09'IS"W
22.00'
;0
01
Ii
U
!Ii:
.
~i5
i'
. ~
~e
z
22'
100'
HENDERSON CREEK
CANAL R/W
22.00'
S89'09'16"E
P.O.B.
P.O.C.
SW CORNER
SECll0N 14
""
~~
~~
Z
w
~
~
0:
W
N872.8'~"L 100,16'
~ S UNE SECTION 14
KEX:
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O,B.-POINT Of BEGINNING
P.O.C,-POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
DESCRIPlION A PARCEL LYING IN THE NORlliWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUlHWEST l/4 OF SECTION 14, TO~SHIP 50
SOUni, RANGE 26 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
COMMENCING AT lHE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECllON 14, lHENCE RUN NB7'38'03"E, A DISTANCE Of 100.16
FEET ALONG THE SOUlH UNE OF SAID SECllON TO lHE EAST UNE Of lliE HENDERSON CREEK CANAL
RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN Noo'5O'''''''"E, A DISTANCE OF 2471.47 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE TO THE POINT Of
BEGINNING: THENCE CONllNUE NOO'50'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 80,00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE: lHENCE RUN
NB9'09'18"W, A DISTANCE OF 22,00 FEET: lHENCE RUN SOO'50'''''''"W, A DISTANCE OF 60,00 FEET ALONG A UNE
RUNNING PARAll..EL TO SAID EAST UNE: THENCE RUN S89'09'18"E, A DISTANCE OF 22,00 FEET TO lHE POINT OF
BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 1,320 SQUARE FEET OR 0.03 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
N. WILKISON (FOR lHE FIRM LB8773)
PR SSIONAl SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
F"LOR1q~t!JCENSE N~~ 4876
llilS ~ DAY Of' 2005,
I:IQ.I[;
lliE PARCEL BEARING. DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CAlCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY OF
SECllON 14. BASIS Of' BEARING: STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/90,
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
COONER & ASSOCIA TES, INC,
SURVEYlNO AND MAPPlNCJ
5670 ZIp DRIVE, FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 339015
l'l::1..EPHONE: 239.277.0722 FAX: 23lil.277.7179I!:MAlL: 6URVEYlNGOCOONER.COM
CUENT: GREELEY AND HANSEN. u.c DRAYrt>l BY: oRF
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: WEU. NO. 23 DATE: 8/24/04
PROOUCllON WEl.l. UTlUTY EASELlENT IN lli
NW 1 4 Of' lliE SW 1/4 OF SEC 14-50-26 PROJECT No: 020901
CHECI<ED BY: J.N. W,
SCALE: 1"-30' REV: 3/31/00
WG NO:SECI4W-TCE(P23) SHEET: 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT !l
~~Of /5""0
PROJECT
PARCEl
FOLIO
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 156 of 236
70<tC,;l/
9~o
~/),l
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 19
IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE 5W 1/4 OF 5ECllON 14, T\YP 50 5,
RGE 26 E, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
I S87'34'1S.W I
22.04'
I t,
I
, tW
t.
;J: JU ,
;- 8~
~8 ~t
8
in z
0>
ca::
cJ
I 22' w
I z
::J
I ~
II::
100' ~2.l!4 I P,D.B. w
HENDERSON CREEl< N87"34'1S.E
CANAL R/W
w
~!
~a
1>187'38'03.E 100.16' z -\ _
- - - ~ S UNE SECllON 1~
. DESCRIPTION A PARCEL LYING IN THE NORTHWEST 1/~ or THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of SECTION 14, TO\\tlSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
..>
K.EX:
R/W - RIGHT-Of-WAY
P.O.B,-POINT Of BEGINNING
P,O.C,-POINT Of COUMENCEMENT
P.O.C.
SW CORNER
SECTION 14 ~
, \1---
COl.tMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECllON 14, THENCE RUN N87"38'03.E, A DISTANCE OF 100.16
f'EET AlONG lliE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECllON TO lliE EAST UNE OF" THE HENOffisON CREEl< CANAL
RIGHT-Of-WAY: THENCE RUN NOO"5Q'......E, A DISTANCE Of 1534.14 FEET ALONG SAID EAST lINE TD THE POINT Of
BEGINNING; THENCE CONllNUE NOO15O'.......E, A DISTANCE Of 100.00 FEET AlONG SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN
SS7'34"8"W, A DISTANCE OF 22.04 I'EET: THENCE RUN Soo'SO'44.W, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET ALONG A UNE
RUNNING PARAUEL TO SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN N87"34'18.E, A DISTANCE or 22.04 FEET TO THE POINT Of
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2,204 SQUARE FEET OR 0.05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
J-~~~-(FOR-;~-;;~ LB6773)
P=S~ON"'1L SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
f1.ORIDA UCENSE N~ 4876
THIS USDA Y Of 2005.
WilE;
THE PARCB. BEARING, DISTANCES, AND AREAS
CALCULATED ARE BASED ON A FIElD SURVEY OF
SECllON 14, BASIS OF BEARING: STATE PlANE
COOROlNAlE SYSlEM, FLA. EAST ZONE, '83/90.
ll-fIS IS NOT A SURVEY
COONER Be ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING AND MAPPING
5670 ZJp DRIVE, FORT MYERS, FI.ORIDA 33905
TELEPHONE: 239.277 .0722 FAX: 239.277.7 179 EMAlL: SURVImNGOcOONER.COM
CUENT: GREElEY AND HANSEN, LLC
PARCEL OESCRIPnON: Vtnl NO, 19
PROOUCllON Vtnl UllUTY EASEMENT IN THE
NW 1/4 OF THE SW i7. OF SEC 14-50-26
ORA \W'>I BY: ..RF
DATE: 8/3/04
PROJECT No: 020901
CHECKED BY: J.N. W,
SCAlE: '".100' REV: 3/31/05
OWG NO:SEC14W-TCE(P11l SHEET: 1 OF' 1
EXHIBIT A
Page...u:e of I c;-- 0
PROJECT
PARCEl
FOlIO
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 157 of 236
70~c;;z I
'1 go/
H/A
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION OF.A UTILITY
EASEMENT FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 15
IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E
COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
S87"36'34-W
22,04'
L~
I~
J.
~
I~
L\J
;
~I
22'
in
01
Ii
U
100'
HENDERSON CREEK
CANAL R/W
22.04 r P.O,B. L\J
1'187"36'34-[ ~
~
It:
lIJ
"
P,Q,C,
SW CORNER
SECTION 14 \ .-
N8728'~"L
100.16'
~ S UNE SECTION 14
~ ">
;10
~~
8~
z
...\._-
W:
R/W - RIGHT-OF-W"'Y
P,O,B,-POINT OF BEGINNING
P.Q,C.-POlNT OF COt.AMENCEMENT
DESCRIPl10N A PAACEL LYING IN THE SOUTHYt1::ST 1/4 OF SECTION 1.4, TO""",,SHIP 50 SOUTH, RmGE 28 EAST.
COWER COUNTY, flORIO...:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION a, THENCE RUN 1'187"38'03"(, A OISTmCE Of 100.18
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE Of SAID SECllON TO THE EAST UNE OF" lHE HENDERSON CREEK CANAL
RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN NOO",O'''''''"E, ... DISTmCE OF 1109.88 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE TO lHE POINT Of
BEGINNING; lliENCE CONTINUE NOO'50'44"E, ... DISTmCE Of 80.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST UNE; THENCE RUN
S87'35'34"W, ... D1STmCE OF 22.04 F'EET: THENCE RUN S00'50'44"W. A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET ALONG A UNE
RUNNING PAA-'ll..El. TO S1JD EAST UNE: THENCE RUN N87"35'34"E, A DISTANCE OF 22,04 FEET TO THE POINT or
BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 1.322 SQUARE FEET OR 0.03 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
~;-~~-(F~rnE~-;:; LS6713)
PR~i~AL SURVEYOR mD I.IAPPER
f1.0RIOA UCENSE Nq. LS 4875
THIS .Ltt:"'DAY Of d#=- 2005, THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
COONER 8:' ASSOCIA YES. INC,
SU~NGAND~~NO
1587Q ZIp DRIVE. FOI'lT MYERS, FLORIDA 3390fS
TE1.EPHONE: 239.277 .0722 F Ale 239.277.7 179 EMAlL: SURVEY1N<JttCOONItR.COM
W2IEi
THE PARCEL BEARING, DISTmcEs. mo AAEAS
CALCULA le:D ARE BASED ON A FlElD SURVEY Of
SECTION 14. BASIS Of BEARING: STAle: PlANE
COOROINAlC: SYSTaC, FlA. EAST ZONE, '83;90,
CUENT: GREELEY mo H"'NSEN. LLC DRAWN BY: .RF
PARCEL DESCRIPllON: Yt1::LL NQ. 15 DATE: 8/12/04
PRODUCTION \'tELL UnUTY EASEMENT IN THE
SW 1/4 Of SEe 1>4-50-28 PROJECT No; 020901
CHECKED BY; J,N.W.
SCALE: 1"-30' REV: 3/31/05
DWO NO:sECI4W- TCE(P11l SHEET: 1 OF 1
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 158 of 236
Memorandum
To:
James W. Delony, P.E., Utilities Administrator
Roy B. Anderson, P .E., Director, PUED
From:
Porfirio E. Gramatges, P,E., Sr, Project Manager
Date:
September 23, 2004
Subject:
South County Regional Water Treatment Plant Reverse Osmosis Wellfield
Expansion to 20-MGD - Wellfield Alignment Analysis and Recommendation
This wellfield expansion will be the source of supply for the 12-Million Gallons per Day Reverse
Osmosis expansion at the South County Regional Water Treatment Plant and it is part of 2003
Water Master Plan Update adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on May 25, 2004 as
agenda item 10 D. This project is needed to meet future potable water demand.
The proposed pipeline and well locations are within and adjacent to a Florida Power and Light
(FPL) easement along the east side of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), The wellfield will extend from
Beck Road to Rattle Snake Hammock Road. Twenty-three Hawthorn Aquifer wells are required.
Greeley and Hansen is the design consultant and Water Resource Solutions is their
hydrogeological sub-consultant. Their scope of services is well field testing, preliminary design,
transmission route study, permitting, and final design and construction management.
Subsequent to project approval by the Board, Greeley and Hansen and Water Resource
Solutions conducted a regional investigation to identify the preferred wellfield areas adjacent to
the South County Regional Water Treatment Plant (SCRWTP) from a water production and
water use permit perspective. This investigation comprised the following principal elements:
· Acquire and develop basic data for the pipeline route and well site selection process
· Develop alternative configurations
· Evaluate and compare the alternatives
· Develop recommended well locations and the best transmission pipeline configuration
based on the results of this investigation
The methodology employed to identify the best well sites and water transmission pipelines
configuration consists of the following major elements:
· Focus on areas that are hydrogeological and environmentally advantageous
· Identify potential well sites and pipeline route alternatives
Public Utilities Engineering Department
Agenda Item No.1 DC
May 10, 2005
. Develop engineering, regulatory, long range planning, safety, public impactPcln'$ ~236
non-cost identifiable criteria against which the alternative pipeline routes and well sites
are evaluated and compared
. Evaluate the permitability and constructability of the alternatives in the field
. Prepare preliminary estimates of project cost for purposes of comparing the alternatives
. Select and weight the non-cost identifiable criteria for this project and
. Identify the best pipeline routes and well sites, considering all of the above
The best configuration may not necessarily be the least expensive in situations were
environmental protection, safety or other considerations override cost.
To provide the necessary water supply volume with the appropriate reliability it was determined
that 23 productions wells will be required. Alternative well sites were developed for each of
these wells along with three alternative pipeline routes. The present well locations and pipeline
routing were determined after applying the pre-established criteria.
Test wells drilling and analysis were completed and a Siting Evaluation Report issued by Water
Resource Solutions on March 11, 2004. This report has verified the well and transmission line
alignment and indicates that the wells are excellent in raw water production and quality.
The Board has issued a resolution for easements to be acquired by gift or purchase. Greeley
and Hansen have conducted the necessary survey work and provided the legal descriptions.
Construction of wells and transmission lines will take two years after permits are issued by
SFWMD and FDEP.
A new contract has been negotiated with Greeley and Hansen for the design of the new wellfield
and is included under the "Wellfield Reliability Improvements and Expansion, RFP 04-3593"
project managed by Dresser, Camp and McKee.
Public Utilities Engineering Department
FILE: FIG2-1
It
JI ~_I '
.
.. 9T; --~ rr~~R
---.
..
.. I REAT ENT PLANT
0( i I
. ", rTJ I
r z
r ", I I \ PROPOSED
Z lJ1 ~ 15' UTILITY
a :::; I
", 0 ! EASEMENT
:E lJ1 ::0 f~~ WATER~
lJ1 lJ1 '~E
. ", :::;
~ ", L IS
Z ", i
. 0 l [ '\""
. CD
Z -<
G') "',
~ ",
z
a rTJ
~
0 i "e:XISTING 1 0 FPL EASEMENT
;lJ
~()
"'c
n::O
:I:::O
r"T1
"'z
0-;
o
"'::e:
f'Tl
r-
r-
r-
o
()
~
i5
z
"
s;:
z
"",.-un
OrTJCO
:::Or-QJ!
lJ15f51ii
gj:!] ;;0
~o::in
'"O~sg
Q!,!l[;j~
-uG') -<
>z"'G')
z>zo
[g5~;;i
Z rTJ;lJ
-u",z
-HT'\::o3::
O::O-rTJ
;::zz
N-C':l-j
o~o
;::Z(T1
~C)~
-<
;::
",
Z
-<
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10. 2005
Page 160 of 236
x."
,",0
"'il
~!!.
PUD - CITY GATE DRIVE
t
SCALE: 1 "= 800'
('--'-
'RAW WAT
IN
,---"
I Ie (
i E"~'" ,Wi !"~T
~Ii' .~ -'I'~ ~ )
, ,.. (,~: 1"'\-----.
\ I~- L--
1-'1~ ( IllLl -~~~
"1 ~ ~\~ I 1'(1 '--, (
'1;:j l.1/1 ill, l
h'~~, ~J I \ ""J "
[,f I I GJ~J'~ I, II I \ ) )(~/
i.... (\}J:I \;
\j \, -- j i I '.... /
-I II I I ,) ~j
~~~La 111~, /MO:I~~-RI~G
I "\ f ~Ell
~',i..ROPO '",Pll'U RAW WATER
~.(/&TRANfM~SfION MAIN
/ >.><<!l1_ I I
I "?1T\ i r
I
I
I C~
18
~
G')
C
::0
rTJ
):
MATCHLlNE SEE FIGURE
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10. 2005
Page 161 of 236
""
'" 0
"';;
~!!.
08:26 GH-F
FILE:
II
:I
.
.
r
.
-<
.
Z
D
:E
.
Z
.
.
Z
?~~
~ ~
r f"1
~ ~
f"1 0
VI :lJ
VI 1/1
f"1 :::;
~ f'1
f'1
o
~
G')
f"1
Z
f"1
~
o
:lJ
r
r
n
;::(")
?ii~
(");:0
J:f""1
"'Z
g-l
01=;:
f""1
r
r
r
o
(")
~
o
Z
1J
r;
Z
"'1::E"'O(")
Of"1CO
;:;0 I CCI""""
Ul5c~
nf"1(");:O
;153(")
=iloco
f"1-;C
Qsa[;j~
"'OC)
"'Zf"1C)
~B~~~
OOZ;:o
z"'O~z
-HTI AJ ~
O:::tl-f'T'\
;::zz
1'.J-G')-1
o::::Jo
;::Zf"1
8C)~
-;
;::
f"1
Z
-;
1--_.
--.
3
2
MATCHlINE SEE FIGURE 1A
-+
1t
SCALE: 1"= 800'
PRO
15'
L SITE No.
(40'x50' SITE)
WELL SITE No. 6
(40'x60' SITE)
PROPOSED 24" RAW WATER
TRANSMISSION MAIN
WELL SITE No. 10
(40'x50' SITE)
EASEMENT
"-J~T '"
put- SWAMP
L /;:.'"
---'7'
PROPOSED 1 6" AW W ~-
TRANSMISSION M IN _~R
y--
U~G ..~L
~:~:-:::=:;
WE:~-1- .. o. 20
( . x . IT)
f:::T )'-'--...-..-...
o OSEO 8"
W 'WATER MAIN
ELL SITE No.22 , _
, ',o.:r-
:!l
G')
C
:lJ
f"1
CD
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 162 at 236
21.60 Prelimina
~1:
1;1;;
~!.
05 08:17 GH-B
II
:I
.
.
..
.
0(
~
z
a
%
~
Z
.
.
Z
?~I
F ~
~ ~
Ul ;0
1/1 Ul
", ;:;l
~
o
~
G'l
",
Z
",
~
o
;0
..
..
a
~;g
00
:J:"O
o
"'VI
81'1
ClIO
:IE
1'1
r
r
r
o
("')
~
o
Z
"0
S;;
Z
olE'lIO
::o1T'lC:O
Ul5~E
ol!lo!a
;1030
~OCO
IT'I-IC:
~~Giz
'lie:') ~
?ZzlT'IG'l
!I2?Z~52
oo-IT'I
z Z;o
'lI~Z
-1"';01:
O;o-IT'I
"'~~~
0:::10
I:Z'"
gG'l!
",
Z
-I
PUD - CITY GATE DRIVE
t
SCALE: I". 800'
EXISllNG
.,
'.~~
WELL SITE No. I
(40'x60' SITE) ,
PROPOSED 8" RAW I
WATER COLLECTION
MAIN
i
MATCHLlNE SEE FIGURE 28
:!l
G'l
c:
;0
IT'I
~
,-
I
I
.
.
..
.
~
..
z
a
z
..
z
.
.
z
,
Qcp~
~~~
F ~
~ ~
1/1 ::tl
1/1 1/1
IT! ~
~
C
~
C'l
~
IT!
~
o
::tl
~~
~~
o
NUl
~8
,;:
IT1
r
r
5
()
~
o
Z
"0
~
~m~~
~l!l~;j
~b~(")
~cc:o
1T!::jC:
~Ia[llz
."C'l ~
~z!2l1
1a~!i2
ocz
Z.,,::;:lz
d;j<!!~
s:Zz
N::jC'l"'l
O::jc
s:Z!:tJ
gC'l~
~
PRopeSI D
15' ~
, "
WELL SITE
No. 7 y <
(60'x22'
SITE)---'
WELL SITE
No.9
(100'x22'
SITE) ---....
DuI\
~;=
iEJJn
I
'~
Do
o
0>-
i""
f= ..
)"" .L
~
~) "~
~ (G
==~
~?o =
N ~ r-
'---
~
~ -
PUD
o
l
MATCHUNE SEE FIGURE 2A
'\ I -
) "'\ ~WELL SITE No. 5
) eJ (40'x50' SITE)
\ I 't ~ROPOSED 8. RAW WATER
\ ) COLLECTION MAIN
\
\ )
( ~WELL SITE No. 6
- (40'x60' SITE)
PROPOSED 12" '"'- '
RAw"':';;:;!;
",~OLLECTlON I-- PROPOSED 30" RAW WATER
~AlN \ ". TRANSMISSION MAIN
G l \ 1 rWELL SITE No. 10
. ,J 1/ (40'x50' SITE)
, < (f. 'J<
v . ""'.....- :>1114 11.
;. ~:6':'w '> ,I kEXIS11NG 170' FPL EASEMENT
7 -SITE) \ r~rELL SITE No. 11
1 W G \(40'X60' SITE)
'"
(sC' ROAD EASEl.tENT J
r WELL SITE
/ No. 17
-~~~22
SITE)
f
""'
I----
lrPROPOSED 2..... RA WAT~
I TRANSMISSION MAIN
~,PROPOSED
1 5' UTILITY EASEM NT
I -,WELL SITE No. 1
If.: V (40'x50' SITE)
~ "\~~PUD - RST ~SEI BLY MINISTRY
llii V~~LLl ;ITE~ ED CATlC N AN REt ABIUTATlON
1>- (100'x22' I PUD - SWAMP B GGY nAve
~ ~ """'/ ." W WATER
GJ TRAN MISSON M~N
J~~P.POSEO 16" , Ir P OPOS~D 8" RAW WATER
7 COu.ECTION ~ C ~~ON MAIN
\ MAIN, t:: ""
'~ ~......J SITE N . 17
~.~~ ' 30' ROAC EAS MENT (40'x )
No. 23 WELL SI~~. 6
~~~22' (40') O' ."",)
, ~/ V- E ISTlN 17(' FPl EASEMEN
r
Agenda Item No, 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 163 of 236
~~
~!.
05 08:18 GH-B
t
SCALE: 1". 800'
I
~WELL C:~ '\
lfo. 19 }
-g~~"" "'"
lr~LL _~ 'E Ne. 18
) 1~I)'x5n .,,'"'
PU - SWAMP l!UGG DA' ~
~
PROPOSED 16" ~W W
TRANSMISSION MI"N
R
/"" WELL SITE
~o. 1:>
(60'x22'
SiTC"i
l~ MOC!( PARK /
, ""''''''''' 1f.
PI'OPOSED L..:
l~' UTIUTY I> G
.... SEMENT
L.,PROPO_SE 8" RAW WATER
COLLEC 'j~ MAIN
._ ;r~E1;L SITE No. 22
, . 1:>1lt.)
RATTLESNAl<E~'CK ROAD
I WELL SITE No. 211
(40'x60' SITE) t
i--PROPOSED 8" RA WATER
tlCOLLECTION MAIN
WELL SITE No. 20
(40'x50' SITE) :
I : I'
I I
) G
~
I
I
I
g
~
N
1Il
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 164 of 236
COLLffiRCOUNTYGOVERNMENT
South County Regional Water Treatment Plant
Reverse Osmosis Wellfie1d Expansion
Well Site and Well Transmission Main Route Study
Technical Memorandum
CJR..L.V AND HAN..N LLC
August 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Tide
Page
1. INTR.OD UCTION "..,........ ,..,.........,..............,...... ..,..,...,..,......,.. ...,..................,.., ,.. "....,......"...".. ,..,......., 1
1,1 Background and Purpose ,..,......................,...........,..........,..............................................,..,......,..1
1.2 Scope of Investigations ........,.".... ...........,.............,.............,....... ..................,..,.... .....".............,...1
1.3 Pipeline Route Selection Methodology ,..............................................,.........,............................1
2. BASIC DATA ....... .... ..,...., .................,...........,......"............,............,..,............. '....,..................., ,........,....... 2
2,1 Introduction...,..,......... ....,.. ....... ..,........,..".. .............,.. ..,.....,........,....,......,...., ....,.....,..... ...... .,... ...... 2
2.2 Route Study Area""..,.." ....,. ............,........... ....,......,................,...................,; ,.......,.......... .......,..", 2
2,3 Aerial Photographs.... ...,... ...... ......,......,..,....,... .........".,..,...........................,....................., .........,.. 2
2,4 Existing Utility Data... ......... ................... .....,......, .........., .............. .......... '........... .........,."... ....,..".. 3
2.5 Rights-of-Way and Easelllents ',.........,',..,.............,..,....,..,...............,.."...,.......,........................., 4
2,6 Traffic Volume..............,.....,.......,. ....,.,...,................,..,.. .,.... .............. ................... "...... ,...."....,..... 4
2.7 Field Reconnaissance ..........,........"..... ..."....,.....................................,.,....,........ ..... ...."..,............. 4
2.8 Historical Structures and Archeological Sites .....................................,..,......,....,...........,..,....,.. 5
2.9 Envirorunen tal .......... ............ ......",..." ,............ ....,......... ............. ............. .......... ....., ....".... ,.......".. 5
2,10 Long Range Planning ...........,.. ............ ............. ..,...........,................,.......... ....,.............. ..............., 5
3, ALTERNA'TIVE PIPELINE ROUTES ..............................................,..................,....".....................,..6
3,1 General........,.......,. ....".. ,...... .........,.....,.......,. ..,.....,..............,................. ....,.. ......"........,.......",....... 6
3.2 Description of Alternative Routes ................,..,.................................,........................................6
3.2.1 Alternative 1: Florida Power and Light Corridor ................................,............,......,................ 6
3.2.2 Alternative 2: Le Buffs Road / FP&L Corridor.........................,......,.............,......,......,.......... 6
3.2.3 Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard / CR 951 ...................................,....,....................,......,.............. 7
3.3 Discussion of Alternative Routes....,........................,.................................................................. 7
4. EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNA'TIVE PIPELINE ROUTES................9
4,1 Cost-Identifiable Evaluation .......................,..........................,..,.........."......,..........,.................... 9
4.1.1 Pipeline Length .................................................................,..,.......................,.........,....................... 9
4.1.2 Property Acquisition Considerations............................,..............,......,...........,....................,....10
4,1.3 Road Restoration ........................................................................................................,................10
4.1.5 Permitting ...........,................................................................................................,........................11
4,1.6 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost .............................................,.........,...................,.....11
4.2 Non-Cost-Identifiable Route Evaluation Criteria ..................,...........,...................................12
4.2.1 Development/Ranking of Criteria..........,..",.,....".....,......,................,........,..............,..,..,........12
4,2.2 Rating the Routes Against Criteria.....,.......................,................,...............,.............................14
Route Study Report. August 2002.doc
August 2002
ca"'..L.V AND HAN..N LLD
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 165 of 236
......
5. ROU'I'E RECO~ATION ......,.....................................,..,....................,..,..............,...,.....,.......,14
5,3 Recommended Route, ........, ...... ......,...,......... ..,.. ..,.... .....,..,.... .......... ....., ......,..........., ,..,... ,...." ....14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDICES
A Pipe Sizing and Hydraulics
B Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
C Alternative Route Evaluation matrix
D Detailed Map of Recommended Route
UST OF FIGURES
1 Area of Apparent Advantageous Hydrogeologic Conditions and Test Well Sites
2 Route Study Area
3 Alternative 1 - FP&L Corridor
4 Alternative 2 - Le Buffs Road/FP&L Corridor
5 Alternative 3 - Beck BoulevardlCR 951
".....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
JII-
Route Study Report - August 2002,doc
August 2002
GI"'..L.V AND HAN..N ~~D
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 166 of 236
COLLIER COUN1Y GOVERNMENT
South County Regional Water Treatment Plant
Reverse Osmosis Wellfie1d Expansion
Well Site and Well Transmission Main Route Study
Technical Memorandum
CilA..L.V ANa HAN..N LLD
August 2002
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Bar.tq;round and Pw;pose
Tbe pwpose of this memorandum is to SllmmilM"'e the investigations conducted to
establish, evaluate, and compare alternative toutes fot the well transmission mains and
altema.tive sites fot the wells intended to convey water to the South County Regional Water
Tteatment Plant (SCRWI'P). The water supply project will increase the raw water supply
available to the SCRWI'P by apptoximately 16 MGD yielding an inctease in finished potable
water of approximately 12 MGD. .
The intent of this memorandum is to present, in summa.ry fonn. the findings and
conclusions of these investigations and to fonnalize recommendations for final route and well
sites selections.
1"2 Scqpe of Inves~tions
Greeley and Hansen liC is the consultant charged with the completion of the pipeline
route and well site investigation. Water ResoU.tce Solutions (WRS) is advising on the apparent
suitability of the well sites from a water production and water use peanitting purview. The
investigations presented herein comprise the following principle elements:
· Acquire and develop basic data needed for the pipeline route and well site
selection process;
· Develop alternative configurations;
· Evaluate and compare the alternatives;
· Recommend the best configuration based on the results of these investigations.
1.3 Pipeline Route Section Methodoloey
The methodology employed to identify the best configuration for the well transmission
mains and well sites consists of the following major elements:
· Focus on area of apparent advantageous hydrogeologic conditions;
· Identify potential pipeline route and well site alternatives;
· Develop engineering, regulatory and non-cost identifia.ble criteria against which
the alternative pipeline routes and well sites are evaluated and compared;
· Evaluate the pennitability and constructability of the alternatives in the field;
-
Route Study Report - August 2002,doc
August 2002
ca"'..L.V ANa HAN..N ......
I
/l_--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
....'
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 167 of 236
. Prepare preliminllry opinions of project cost for purposes of comparing the
alternatives;
. Select and weight the non-cost-identi6able criteria for this project; and
. Identify the best pipeline routes and well sites, considering all of the above,
The best configuration may not necessarily be the least expensive in situations where
environmental protection, safety or other considerations override cost.
2" BASIC DATA
2.1 Introduction
Greeley and Hansen llC conducted a feasibility evaluation of this project in August
2001. Each route presented herein considers a maximum 3D-inch diameter pipeline capable of
transferring up to 16 million gallons per day, The mainline diameter of each alternative is sized
based on all wells simultaneously running and producing 16 MGD total. . Branch lines are sized
assuming a maximum flow from individual wells of 1,000 GPM
To compare alternatives, it is necessary to acquire information on the various factors
that affect the suitability and cost of each alternative, Comparative evaluations of the
alternatives included the development of .probable construction, wetla.nd mitigation, and land
acquisition costs. Pertinent criteria., including safety, environmental, long range planning, and
other criteria, which are not readily cost identifiable, have been assessed by means of an
evaluation matrix. 1bis matrix will be discussed later in the memorandum, Experienced pipeline
and design and construction engineers evaluated these factors with respect to each alternative
alignment in order to rank. the alternative alignments,
2"2 Route Study Area
A route study area is simply the area within which alternative routes from Point A to
Point B are developed. In this evaluation, Point A is the connection point with the SCRWI'P,
which is the 36-inch stub-out located in the southeast corner of the plant site, Point B is the
approximate 23 well sites located within the area of apparent advantageous hydrogeologic
conditions identified by WRS, Due to project scheduling requirements, three well sites within
this area have been selected to confirm hydrogeological conditions via aquifer performance
testing. This testing must precede permitting and development of the remainder of the
production wells. The target area for wells and the test well sites are shown on Figure 1.
The boundaries of a route study area are often defined by natural and man made
features, which, if crossed by a proposed pipeline route, would result in unnecessary increased
pipeline length and cost which would otherwise be avoided by staying within the route study
area. The limiting factors, in this study area, for developing a multitude of alternative routes are
the crossing of large wetlands and crossing large tracts of undeveloped property, Figure 2 shows
the Route Study Area,
2,3 Aerial PhotolP'~h8
Recent aerial photographs are helpful in pipeline route selection to identify density of
development, environmentally sensitive lands, highways, railroads, waterways, and other natural
and man made features visible from the air, For this evaluation, GIS files were provided by
Collier County, which include color aerial photography and property lines. Additionally, color
Route Study Report - August 2002,doc
August 2002 2
ca"'..L.V AND HAN..N ~"':
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 168 of 236
aerial photography and property information was also obtained by internet communication with
the Collier County property appraiser's web site. This photography was a lower resolution than
the GIS files, however, the property information was more up to date.
2,4 Existing Utility Data
Information on existing public utilities, particularly underground utilities, is helpful to
identify potential utility conflicts. Existing large diameter sanitary and storm sewers, sanitary
force mains and water mains are usually the greatest concern. Collier County utility data
collected and reviewed in conjunction with this study included several atlas style maps of existing
and proposed sanitary sewers, force mains, reclaimed water, and potable water mains,
Infonnation from Collier County on existing major utilities indicates the following utilities are
present in the route study area,
Florida Power and Light (FP&L) Corridor
Utility
High Voltage (13.8kV)
Power Transmission Lines
Location
Power lines are aligned approximately 55 feet from
the eastern boundary of the 170-foot wide FP&L
corridor ~ north and south east ofCR 951,
Along east side of FP&L corridor north White
Lake Corponte Park
Sanitary Force Main
Beck Boulevard
Utility
Location
Enters Beck Boulevard from the Tollgate
Commercial Center approximately 1,000 feet east
of CR 951 and travels west to CR 951 where it
crosses and exits the study area,
Runs east along Beck Blvd. and serves Toll Gate
RV Park and residential areas along Le Buffs Road,
12-inch Force Main
Water Main
County Road 951
Utility
Location
Enters CR 951 from Forest Glen Blvd then travels
south within the CR 951 right-of-way. 8-inch force
main becomes a 12-inch force main in front of
Naples Golf and Country Club.
The 48-inch water main enters CR 951 from the
SCRWI'P and travels south within the right of way
to the intersection ofCR 951 and Davis Blvd where
it turns west out of the CR 951 right-of-way.
The 20-inch water main begins at the intersection
of CR 951 and Davis Blvd and travels south within
the CR 951 right-of-way for the entire length of the
study area.
8-inch / 12-inch force main
48 -inch water main
20-inch Water Main
Note: Only information on existing utilities is identified in these tables, Proposed
utilities are discussed later in this memorandum.
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
O"'..L.V AND HAN..N ....0
3
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 169 of 236
,-...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A review of utilities in the study area indicates that private utilities will have a minimal
effect on route selection, The high voltage power transmission lines located within the FP&L
cottidor will have the greatest impact on route evaluations, Other private utility information was
not reviewed for the purpose of route selection. Such utilities include cable TV, gas mains,
telephone conduits, fiber optic conduits, and buried electrical conduits, Generally, but not in all
instances, telecommunications and power distribution lines do not have a significani impact on
route sdection, It was determined that private utilities within the cottidors identified in each
route alternative would not gready affect the route selection. A more detailed investigation of all
utilities will be completed prior to final design of the pipeline alignment within the route selected
based on this report.
"'-
2,5 Right-of-W"YB and Easements
Property information and maps for evaluating right-of-way widths and proposed
easements were obtained and reviewed for this project as follows:
Source
Collier County
Collier County
Real Estate Data, Inc,
Type
GIS information
Property Appraiser Website
REDI Maps
...-
2,6 Traffic Volume
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Streets with very heavy traffic volume are often not suitable for open trench pipeline
construction, particularly if adequate room is not availa.ble adjacent to traffic lanes and detours
are inconvenient or not available. Conversely, streets with light traffic volumes may be attractive
for pipeline construction, Traffic conditions were observed for this study during field
reconnaissance and are summarized as follows:
Road
County Road 951
Traffic Conditions
Moderately heavy, however, a trencbless
crossing is anticipated,
Moderate, however, a trenchless crossing is
anticipated
Moderate to Light
Heavy traffic during peak. hours.
Significant development adjacent to road.
Interstate 75
White Lake Boulevard
Beck Boulevard
2" 7 Field Reconnaissance
~
An important part of pipeline alternative route studies is field reconnaissance to observe
actual conditions along each route, including:
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
ClR..L.V AND HAN..N ....0
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 170 of 236
· Room for construction;
. Presence of wetlands;
· Adjacent drainage;
. Pavement condition;
· Overhead utilities;
· Traffic;
· Topography / Geotechnical;
· Access for special crossings; and
· Type and density of commercial and residential development,
Field reconnaissance was conducted in the route study area to develop alternatives,
After development of alternatives, field reconnaissance is employed again to confirm feasibility
and identify specific cost items, The results of these observations are included in the discussion
of alternative development and evaluation hereinafter,
2"8 Historical Structures and Archeologjcal Sites
The Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources maintains
infor;nation on sites that may be historically or archeologically sjgnificant. The routes reviewed
under this report generally lie within existing corridors minimi7.ing the potential for disruption of
historical structures or archeological sites, Prior to completion of final design, it is
recommended that the proposed pipeline alignment be reviewed to determine if any historically
significant sites are impacted.
2.9 Environmental
For the purpose of this study, pipeline routes generally follow existing utility corridors or
public rights-of-way thus rninit'ni7.ing the environmental impact. Branch collector mains to single or
small groups of wells often follow property lines, which may not have been cleated for other
purposes. Although the construction corridors for these smaller pipelines (8 to 16 inches in
diameter) are narrow, environmental impacts may be significant when creating new corridors,
Much of the area is forested wetlands dominated by Cypress trees. Some of the area is
poor quality forested wetlands, which suffer from domination by Mel1a1euca, an invasive, exotic
species. The project is clearly in the public interest and thus should be permittable. Impacts to
forested wetlands, however, will likely require mitigation, It is difficult at this point to accurately
quantify costs associated with mitigation because the ratios required by regulatory agencies vary,
The costs developed herein are useful. for comparing routes since all alternatives would likely be
assigned the same ratio.
2,10 Lon,g Range PIAnnina-
Another important consideration is the interaction of the proposed pipeline with future
projects. Collier County's Water and Wastewater Master Plans published in 2001 identify the
planned water and wastewater utility improvements throughout the county, These documents
describe all County proposed capital improvement projects through the year 2021. In addition, the
2006/2007 and 2025 transportation plans, published by the Florida Department of Transportation,
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
ClI........v AND HAN..N ..0
5
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 171 of 236
"".......
~
were reviewed. The proposed long-range planning projects within the route study area are as
follows:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. Construct 36" Water Main along County Road 951 from Beck Blvd to
Rattlesnake Hammock Road
. Additional lanes added to County Road 951
3, ALTERNATIVE PIPELINE ROUTES
3,1 General
Several transmission pipeline alternative routes from the SCRWI'P to the test wells were
identified and evaluated, A major consideration in the selection of route altema.tives was
existence of roads or utility corridors and environmentally sensitive lands, Alternative routes
were identified based on field observation and review of collected data. Both cost and non-cost
factors were considered in the selection of the alternative routes, Three altematives were
considered for further study and are tided as follows:
. Alternative 1: FP&L Corridor
. Alternative 2: Le Buffs Road / FP&L Corridor
. Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard / CR 951
filii-
These route corridors and well configurations are shown on Figure 3, 4, and 5,
respectively.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3"2 Description of Altemative Routes
3"2"1 Altemative 1: F10rida Power and Light Corridor
The main line of this alternative heads east from the 36-inch stub, at the southeast
comer of the SCRwrP, across the FP&L cotridor to the east 30' of the FP&L corridor where it
turns south. The route follows this FP&L corridor southerly across White Lake Boulevard and
Interstate 75, thence continues south across Beck Boulevard to the northem test well site, From
here, the route continues southerly in the east 30 feet of the FP&L corridor approximately 1.5
miles to the central test well site and another 1.5 miles to the temrinus at the southern test well
site. Proposed well sites are scattered linearly aloog the southern 3 miles of the route generally at
one-quarter mile intervals. Along the southern two miles of this route are several opportunities
for lateral branch pipelines to small groups of wells.
I
3,2,2 Altemative 2: Le Buffs Road / FP&L Corridor
The main line of this alternative heads east from the 36-inch stub, at the southeast
corner of the SCRWTP, across the FP&L cotridor to the east 30' of the FP&L corridor where it
turns south, The route follows this FP&L corridor southerly approximately 700 feet to the
north boundary of the White Lake Corporate Park where the route turns easterly along this
boundary, When it reaches the eastern boundary of the corporate park, the route turns
southerly along the boundary to White Lake Boulevard. The route goes approximately one-
eighth mile east-southeast within this right-of-way to a point where it turns south and crosses
White Lake Boulevard, Interstate 75 and Beck Boulevard to Le Buffs Road, This route then
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
GR..L..V ANI:I HAN..N ~~D
6
.....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 172 of 236
continues southerly in Le Buffs Road to the end of the maintained rigbt-of-way thence
continues southerly along a property line approximately 1,000 feet to the south boundary of
Section 1, Township 50 south, Range 26 east. The route then goes west approximately one mile
along this south boundary to the FP&L corridor where it turns southerly in the east 30 feet of
the FP&L corridor approximately one-half mile to the central test well site and another 1.5 miles
to the tenninus point at the southern test well site. Proposed well sites are scatttred linearly
along Le Buff Road, the east-west section line and along the FP&L corridor at approximate one-
quarter mile intervals. Along the FP&L co.cridor are several opportunities for lateral brancb
pipelines to small groups of wells.
3.2.3 Alternative 3: Beck Blvd. / CR 951
This alternative heads east from the 36-inch stub, at the southeast comer of the
SCRWI'P, across the FP&L corridor to the east 30 feet of the FP&L corridor wbere it turns
south. The route follows this FP&L corridor southerly across White Lake Boulevard and
Interstate 75, thence continuing south across Beck Boulevard to the Northern test well site. At
this point, the route heads west in the south part of Beck Boulevard to County Road 951 and
thence south in County Road 951 right-of-way approximately three miles to the tenninus at
Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Proposed well sites would include the north test well site and
wells dispersed linearly along County Road 951 at approximate one-quarter mile intervals.
Along the southerly two miles of this route are several opportunities for lateral branch pipelines
to small groups of wells. .
3.3 Discussion of Alternative Routes
Alternative 1: Florida Power and Light Corridor
The following discussion generally follows along the route from north to south. Leaving
the plant site, the pipeline will have to sbare the east 30 feet of the FP&L corridor with a sanitary
force main until it reaches the White Lake Corporate Park (about 1,000 feet). Along the entire
FP&L corridor, the pipeline passes electrical transmission towers spaced at 500 to 600-foot
intervals. These towers are located 55 feet from the east boundary of the 170-foot wide FP&L
easement. Most of the towers are single concrete poles with lateral guy wires, which penetrate
grade 40 feet from the tower. This means a guy wire will be located 15 feet from the east
boundary of the FP&L corridor every 500 to 600 feet. This appears to be the greatest obstacle
to negotiate with the pipe alignment for this route. FP&L was unable to provide any details on
the guy anchors located underground.
The western side of the FP&L corridor was considered, however, only the east 100 feet
of the corridor bas been cleared so environmental impacts would have been extreme. In
addition, this is the most likely side for future parallel electrical power transmission facilities,
which makes our encumbrance of the FP&L easement more difficult for FP&L to accept.
White Lake Boulevard is the first roadway encountered. A trenchless crossing is
proposed due to consistent traffic to the landfill and the lack of a convenient detour. This
crossing may have to be accomplished with the Interstate crossing; however, two shorter
crossings would be preferential due to the already long and difficult proposed Interstate
crossing. The Interstate crossing will require micro-tunneling through anticipated hard
limestone and high groundwater tables. This trenchless method will afford the greatest degree
of safety to the Interstate and facilitate permitting.
Route Study Report. August 2002.doc
August 2002
tI....L.V AND HAN..N LLC
7
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 173 of 236
-
...
Tbe next significant feature along the route is Beck Boulevard, which appears that it
could be open cut and alternating traffic directions maintained for the light residential traffic.
For conservative purposes, a trenchless crossing is assumed to be required. The drainage ditch
within Beck Boulevard right-of-way is proposed to be open cut.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Pipeline construction just south of Beck Boulevard will require design and construction
coordination to minimize traffic and storage impacts to a local business, which uses the FP&L
easement. South of here, the pipeline crosses the Forest Glen residential and golf course
development. Tbe entrance way could possibly be open-cut utilizing the median to separate
traffic from construction, however, for conservancy, a trenchless crossing is assumed here.
From here to Ratdesnake Hammock Road, the route crosses very little as far as
development with the exception of one under construction residential development.
The well sites associated with this route and the branch transmission mains are all
adjacent to existing property lines and utilize existing dirt roads where available. Impact
associated with these smaller mains should be manageable. Proposed well sites have been
located to attempt to minimize inconvenience to underlying landowners. Areas of concern
include well sites, which will have emergency generators located near developments such as
Forest Glen. Design of generator enclosures should address sound attenuation as well as
aesthetics.
-
Alternative 2: Le Buffs Road / FP&L Cor:rldor
The following discussion follows the route generally from north to south. From the 36-
inch stub at the southeast comer of the plant site, this route would cross the FP&L easement
and share the east 30-feet of the FP&L corridor with a sanitary force main until it reaches the
northern boundary of the White Lake Corporate Park (about 1,000 feet). At this point, the
route turns east along the north boundary of the White Lake Corporate Park north of the access
road. At the eastern boundary of the White Lake Corporate Park, the route turns south along
the property line and crosses White Lake Boulevard and Interstate 75. A trenchless crossing of
White Lake Boulevard is proposed due to the consistent traffic to the Landfill and the lack of a
convenient detour. More easily than with Alternative 1, the trenchless crossing of White Lake
Boulevard could be accomplished separately from the crossing of Interstate 75, as more space is
available between the two roads at this crossing location. The trenchless crossing of Interstate
75 under this alternative will be approximately 100 feet shorter than with the other two
alternatives. However. the property for the northern test well site, procurement of which is
already underway, would be unavailable for production of water supply. Testing data from this
site may be useful but would carry a degree of uncertainty due to poor proximity to proposed
production wells.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
South of Interstate 75 the route travels along Le Buffs Road through a residential area to
the end of the maintained right of way. At this point, the route would be creating a new
corridor through undisturbed forested land for approximately 1,000 feet to the south boundary
of Section 1, Township 50 south Range 26 east. The route then turns west and continues
through undisturbed forest for approximately one mile along the south boundary of the Forest
Glen development until it reaches the FP&L corridor. From this point south to Rattlesnake
Hammock Road, the route is the same as Alternative 1 with slightly different branches.
.....
Similar to Alternative 1, the well sites and branch transmission mains are all adjacent to
existing property lines, using dirt roads where available to minimize environmental impacts as
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
ca.....L.V ANa HAN..N ~.a
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 174 of 236
well as inconvenience to landowners. Impacts to the surrounding areas due to these smaller
mains should be manageable. This pipe alignment required that more wells be located near
residential areas such as the area along Le Buffs Road and Forest Glen residential and golf
course development. Well sites with emergency generators located near residential
developments will require attention during design of generator enclosures and will need to
address sound attenuation as well as aesthetics. '.
Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard / CR 951
This alternative follows the same alignment as alternative one from the SCRWI'P south
to Beck Boulevard. At this point, the route heads west in the southern part of Beck Boulevard
right-of-way to County Road 951. The southern portion of the Beck Boulevard right-of-way is
surplus right-of-way made obsolete when the Interstate was extended. ,providing adequate
space for pipe ~ent along this portion of the route.
.
Once the route reaches County Road 951, it turns southerly in the eastern side of the
right-of-way. This high traffic, heavily improved corridor is a relatively poor place to site
medium-large diameter pipeline construction. There are existing utilities within the CR 951
right-of-way including a 12-inch force main, a 48-inch water main, and a 20-inch water main.
Future plans call for construction of a 36-inch water main within the CR 951 right-of-way from
Beck Boulevard south to Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Future plans also call for the
construction of additional traffic'lanes, and therefore, additional drainage facilities. Utility
congestion along the CR 951 would complicate pipeline design and construction. The right-of
way is bounded on the east by drainage canals and residential development entranceways with
elaborate'landscaping and green space is limited along the route. These improvements require
installation of the pipeline under the roadway, resulting in greater public inconvenience due to
traffic disruption and increased cost due to road reconstruction.
4. EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PIPEUNE
ROUTES
4.1 Cost-Identifiable Evaluation
Each alternative route contains variable cost-identifiable features. Typically, pipeline
length is the most influential factor. Other significant factors include special installati6h
techniques (e.g. ttenchless installation), the cost and type of property required, the amount of
environmental restoration/mitigation required and pavement/roadway restoration.
4.1.1 Pipeline Length
The estimated lengths of the alternative routes are presented below. The cost of open
cut construction for a 30-inch diameter pipeline is estimated at $210 per linear foot. The cost of
trenchless installation of a casing pipe for a 30-inch diameter pipeline by jacking and augering is
estimated at $600 per linear foot. The long micro-tunneled crossing anticipated for crossing
Interstate 75 is $1,300 per linear foot of casing plus the cost of the carrier pipe. These costs are
derived from similar pipeline projects and current construction cost trends. The total lengths of
the alternative routes including branch lines are as follows:
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
1a....L.V AND HAN..N LLQ
9
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 175 of 236
-
...
Overall Pipeline Lengths
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Route
Altemative 1: FP&L Corridor
Alternative 2: Le Buffs Road / FP&L Corridor
Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard / CR 951
Length
34,500 ft.
39,000 ft.
38,600 ft.
4.1.2 Proper(y Acq.uisition Considerations
",....
In general, route development attempts to utilize public rights-of-way and avoid
requiring easements. When necessary routes utilize easements whose characteristics are
favorable for acquisition or which are required for the successful completion of the project. The
cost of easement acquisition is based upon estimates of the property value and acquisition
services fees. For typical permanent easements, a partial use factor is assigned and multiplies
times the property value accounting for the fact that some surface uses of the land will still be
allowed (such as parking lots). In cases where the taking of property does not allow the owner
future partial use, 100 percent of the unit property cost is used. Based on project experience, the
County has recommended that the cost oC pe.ttnanent easement be estimated using a unit cost of
$ 75,000 per acre. For an easement within the FPL&L corridor, where the land has already been
encumbered, a 50% partial use factor has been assigned. The value of temporary construction
easements is estimated as 30 percent of the unit property value multiplied by the easement area,
to allow for a three-year land rent at a value of 10 percent per year. In addition, a $15,000 per
parent parcel fee for engineering, survey and legal fees for property acquisition is assumed.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Easement costs used in this report are based upon a 3D-foot wide permanent easement
and typically a 20-foot wide temporary construction easement. The temporary easement may
not be required if a usable right-of-way is adjacent to the permanent easement. Properties for
well sites are recommended to be acquired in fee simple.
The greatest easement cost for this project will likely be for easements within the FP&L
corridor for which FP&L has an easement. The fee simple land owners would lose very little
property rights as the land is already encumbered in a similar fashion for electrical power
transmission. A mutual use agreement will be required from FP&L. If the proposed pipeline
interferes little with existing and future electrical power transmission uses, FP&L sbould be
amenable to the mutual use agreement and historically do not charge a fee.
Environmental and permitting concerns make it difficult to define a.bsolutely the exact
property proposed for acquisition without a qualified environmental inspection of each site, with
potential adjustments, a.nd subsequent meetings with regulatory agencies. Project scheduling
requirements do not allow for this to be performed before the sites are identified for this report.
4.1.3 Road Restoration
......
In locations where the pipe is aligned along a road and right-of-way and green space is
insufficient to construct the pipeline, a portion of the road bed may be disturbed. In instances
where the pavement is disturbed, the road base in the impacted lane is restored and the entire
road width is overlaid. These roadway restoration costs may become significant where long
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
ClA.....V ANI:! HAN..N ~~D
10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No.1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 176 of 236
lengths of roadways are disturbed. The estimated cost of road restoration/replacement is $70.00
per linear foot. This value is based on similar projects and current construction cost trends.
County Road 951 and Le Buffs Road would require the most restoration associated with
the alternative routes.
It should be noted that all of the proposed pipe corridors have no parallel storm
drainage structures. Most stonn drainage is accomplis bed with roadside ditches. The crossing
of existing storm drainage culverts will be restored if disturbed by the proposed construction,
with no change in, the existing drainage patterns.
4.1.5 Permitting
The list of permits required for each of the alternative routes are similar and it is
assumed that engineering fees associated with application, preparation, and permit fees will not
sigoificandy impact cost evaluation. The level of complexity will be high for environmental
permits associated with Alternative 2 - LeBuffs Road/FP&L Corridor and for Right-of-Way
Use Permits for the County Road 951 alternative. Although the stipulations set forth in some
permits may require cost identifiable measures, at this time, those items are not known.
Consequendy, no permitting cost associated with the construction of the alternative routes has
been identified. The following permits may be re~uired:
· Collier County Right-of-Way Use Permit;
· Florida Department of Transportation Utility Permit;
· Florida Department of Environmental Protection Intent to Use/Department of
Health Public Drinking Water Facility Permit;
· SFWMD Water Use Permit for the wells;
· USEP A NPDES Permit for Non-Point Source (Construction);
· SFWMD /FDEP / ACOE Environmental Resource Permit; and
· Florida Power and Light Mutual Use Agreement.
-,
4.1.6 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
Before costs could be developed, each segment of pipe had to be sized. The mainline
pipe is sized for all wells on and pumping a total of 16 MGD. The branch lines are sized
assuming a maximum flow from individual wells of 1,000 GPM. Pipeline size and hydraulics is
detailed in Appendix A. Preliminary opinions of probable cost have beeo prepared for the
alternative pipeline routes including property acquisition, wetland mitigation, well construction,
and a 15% contingency, and are included in Appendix B. The probable construction costs for
each route are summarized as follows:
Probable Construction Cost Estimates
Route
Alternative 1: FP&L Corridor
Alternative 2: Le Buffs Road / FP&L Corridor
Cost
$15,387,000
$16,700,000
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
GR..L&V AND HAN..N LLD
11
I
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 177 of 236
,,'-
Probable Construction Cost Estimates
Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard / CR 951 $16,310,000
"'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.2 Non-Cost-Identifiable Route Evaluation Criteria
I',
4.2.1 Development/Weivrit1i of Criteria
Tbe alternative pipeline routes were evaluated and compared based on an array of oon-
cost-identifiable criteria. The non-cost-identifiable criteria consist of possible characteristics or
special requirements associated with the specific project. Although they are not evaluated with a
cost value, these criteria are of critical importance in determining the appropriate route. The
consultant team selected which criteria ate applicable to the proposed pipeline. Tbe non-cost-
identifiable criteria, developed for this evaluation are shown as follows:
-
'"-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,-
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
1lI.....L.V AND HAN..N ~~a
12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No.1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 178 of 236
N on-Cost-Identifiable Route Evaluation Criteria
Criteria Impacts
Pipeline Length . Duration of construction; date of initial operation
. Number of pipe joints and potential latent defects
(e.g. future leaks)
. Number of appurtenances requiring O&M
. Duration of public inconvenience
Public Inconvenience . Complaints; community relations
. Business operations and profits
. Tranquility of life (e.g. noise, dust, vibration)
. T~ of private land
Safety . Accessibility for emergency vehicles
. Public and business commuting time and cost
. Availability of adequate detour routes
. Coordination between traffic agencies
Major Road Crossings . Duration of construction
. Permitting
. Future maintenanc~ accessibilitv
Geotechnical Considerations . Dewatering; construction duration
. Corrosion potential
. Construction contingency cost
Permitting Requirements . Bidding schedule
. Construction scheduling and sequencing
. Agency review
. Publicbe~gjnotification
Right-of-Way /Easement . Administrative, surveying and engineering costs
Availability . Desi~ and biddin2 schedules
Operation and Maintenance . O&M convenience
Accessibilitv
Environmental Impact/W etlands . Mitigation engineering and monitoring
Mitigation . Land acquisition
. Design and bidding schedules
. Design and construction complexity
. Public relations
Long-Range Planning . Consistency with future projects
. Future utilities
. Future road/intersection enhancements
Special Construction . Duration of Construction
Requirements . Time and Cost
To identify which criteria are most important to pipeline route selection each were assigned
a weighting factor. This was accomplished by polling several pipeline engineers for their respective
opinions of relative importance. Each of the individuals reviewed the project and familiarized
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
G.....L..V ANg HAN..N ..a
13
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 179 of 236
".....-
"-
themselves with the project area before filling out the criteria-weighting matrix. The results of the
criteria weightings are shown in the evaluation matrix.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.2.2 RArif1ll'the Routes A,gAinllt Criteria.
Using an evaluation matrix is a convenient method of rating each route against each of
the 11 weighted non-cost-identifiable route selection criteria previously discussed. The
alternative routes were compared and each was rated against every criterion on a scale of 1
(poor) to 4 (excellent). The resulting products (criterion weight x rating) were summed to obtain
a total score for each route. The route with the highest total score represents the preferred route
based on non-cost identifiable criteria.
The Alternative Route Evaluation Matrix Scores are shown in Appendix C and are
summarized as follows:
Non-Cost-Identifiable
Route Selection Criteria Score
Route
Alternative 1: FP&L Corridor
Alternative 2: LeBuffs / FP&L Corridor
Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard / CR 951
Score
165 (best)
141
99 (worst)
~~
5. ROUTE RECOMMENDATION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.1 Recommended Route
Subject to the successful negotiation of a mutual use agreement with Florida Power and
Light and subject to the assessment of environmental characteristics, mosdy associated with well
sites and branch transmission mains, and subsequent, successful discussion with regulators,
Alternative 1 is recommended for both cost and non-cost reasons. This route is the least cosdy,
has the least traffic impacts, has the least impact to the general public, and is the shortest.
Appendix D includes detailed aerial color photographic mapping including property lines and
folio numbers.
..--
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
ca.......v ANa HAN..N ......
14
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 180 of 236
APPENDIX A
Pipe Sizing and Hydraulics
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
a....L.V ANO HAN..N LLD
.1
,..-
.....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
"'--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
SCR WTP Reverse Osmosis Well field Expansion
Alternative: 1 - FP&L Corridor
Pipeline Sizing and Hydraulics
Greeley and Hansen
July 2002
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 181 of 236
Pipe Length Nom. Pipe Inside Pipe Average Flow Average
Pipe Label (feet) Diameter Diameter (gpm) Velocity (fps)
(inches) (inches)
P-1 4,100 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-1A 600 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-1A. 80 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-2 1,750 ..30 29.28 10,633 5.1
P-3 2,050 30 29.28. 10,150 4.8
P-3A 100 30 29.28 10,150 4.8
P-4 1,600 24 23.61 9,667 7.1
P-5 1,250 24 23.61 9,183 6.7
P-6 1,400 24 23.61 8;700 6.4
P-7 1,350 12 11.65 967 2.9
P-8 1,300 8 7.98 483' 3.1
P-9 1,200 B 7~98 483 3.1
P-10 1,300 24 23.61 7,250 5.3
P-11 1,400 20 19.76 6,283 6.6
P-12 1,200 16 15.92 1 ,450 2.3
P-13 .1,450 12 11.65 967 2.9
P-14 1,350 20 19.76 4,350 4.6
P-15 1,350 8 7.98 483 3.1
P-16 1 ,400 16 15.92 3,867 6.2
P-17 1,350 8 7.98 483 3.1
P-18 1,200 8 7.98 483 3.1
P-19 1,500 16 15.92 2,900 4.7
P-20 1,200 8 7.98 483 3.1
P-21 f,200 16 15.92 1,933 3.1
. P-22 1,300 12 11.65 967 2.9
P-23 1,300 8 7.98 483 3.1
TOTAL
34,500
ft.
PIPE MATERIAL
8" -12" C900 PVC CLASS 150
16" - 30" C905 PVC CLASS 165
.t:lQR
Average flow shown Is with aU 23 wells pumping
a total of 16 MGD. Branch lines are sized
assuming 1000 GPM max. per well.
PI PE_ Costs.xls
8/612002
I
I'
I:
I:
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
.'
I
I
~
I
'.
i
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 182 of 236
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
SCRWTP Reverse Osmosis Wellfield Expansion
Alternative: 2 - Le Buffs RoadIFP&L Corridor
Pipeline Sizing and Hydraulics
Greeley and Hansen
July 2002
Pipe Lengtb Nom. Pipe Inside Pipe Average Average
Pipe Label (feet) Diameter Diameter Flow (gpm) Velocity
(incbes) (inches) (fps)
P-1 9,500 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-1A 500 30 29.28 11,117 5.3 .
P-1A 80 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-2 1,300 30 29.28 .. 10,649 5.1
P-3 . 1,300 30 29.28 10,186 4.9
P-4 1,300 24 23.61 9,723 7.1
P-5 1,400 24 .23.61 9,260 6.8
P-6 1,800 . 24 23.61 8,797 6.4
P-7 1,350 24 23.61 8,334 6.1
P-8 1,250 24 23.61 7,871 5.8
P-9 1,400 24 23.61 7,408 5.4
P-10 1,300 24 23.61 6,945 5.1
P-11 1,200 8 7.98 463 3.0
P-12 1,400 20 19.76 6.019 6.3
P-13 1,200 12 11.65 1,389 4.2
P-14 1,450 12 11.65 926 2.8
P-15 1,350 16 15.92 4,167 6.7
P-16 1,350 8 7.98 463 3.0 .
P-17 1,400 16 15.92 3,704 6.0
P-18 1,350 8 7.98 463 3.0
P-19 1,200 B 7.98 463 3.0
P-20 1,500 16 15.92 2,778 4.5
P-21 1,200 B 7.98 463 3.0
P-22 1,200 16 15.92 1,852 3.0
P-23 1,300 8 7.98 463 3.0
TOTAL
39,000
ft.
PIPE MATERIAL
8" - 12" C900 PVC CLASS 150
16" - 30" C905 PVC CLASS 165
NOTE
Average flow shown Is wIth all 23 wells pumping
a total of16 MGD. Branch lines ara sized
assuming 1000 GPM max. perwell.
PIPE_Costs.xls
816/2002
I
,....:...
...
,.........
"'-
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
-
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 183 of 236
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
SCR WTP Reverse Osmosis Wellfield Expansion
Alternative: 3 - County Road 951
Pipeline Sizing and Hydraulics
Greeley and Hansen
July 2002
Pipe Length Nom. Pipe Inside Pipe Average Flow Average
Pipe Label (feet) Diameter Diameter (gpm) Velocity (fps)
(inches) (inches)
P-1 4,100 30 29.28 11,117 6.3
P-1A 600 . 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-1A 80 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-2 2,000 30 29.28 10,649 5.1
P-3 4,500 30 29.28 10,186 4.9
P-3A 100 30 29.28 10,186 4.9
P-4 1-,300 16 15.92 2,315 3.7 ..
P-5 1,300 24 23.61 7,871 5.8
P-6 1,300 24 23.61 1,852 1.4
P-7 1,400 24 23.61 7,408 5.4
P;,,8 1,400 8 7.98 1,389 8.9
P-9 1,350 8 7.98 926 5.9
P-10 1,300 8 7.98 463 3.0 .
P-11 1,300 24 23.61 6,482 4.8
P-12 1,200 16 15.92 1,852 3.0
P-13 1,400 20 19.76 4,830 4.8
P-14 1,400 16 15.92 1,389 2.2
P-15 1,200 12 11.65 92B 2.8
P-16 1,450 8 7.98 463 3.0
P-17 1,350 20 19.76 4,167 4.4
P-18 1,400 18 15.92 3,704 8.0
P-19 1,350 12 11.65 926 2.8
P-20 1,400 8 7.98 463 3.0
P~21 1,500 16 15.92 2,315 3.7
P-22 1,200 16 15.92 1,852 3.0
P-23 1,200 16 15.92 1,389 2.2
P-24 1,300 8 7.98 463 3.0
TOTAL
38,SOO ft.
',;
PIPE MATERIAL
8" -12"
1S" - 30"
liQR
Average flow shown Is with all 23 wells pumping
a total of 16 MGO. Branch lines are sized
assumIng 1000 GPM max. per well.
C900 PVC CLASS 150
G905 PVC CLASS 165
PIPE_Costs. xIs
8/612002
I
I
I
I
II
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 184 of 236
APPENDIX B
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
ca"..L.V ANI:! HAN..N ~~D
I'
....-'-
~~
I!
Ii
Ij
Ii
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
, .
I
I
I
.
-
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 185 of 236
Collier County Government
South County Regional Water Treatment ,Plant
Reverse Osmosis Wen Field Expansion
Cost Estimate
Alternative 1 - FP&L Corridor
"
Greeley and Hansen LLC
August 2002
Item Dncrlptlon ' Unit Price Unit ,Quantity Cost
1 ~ Raw Water PiceUne. In Open-cut Trench
Furnlah &: Instan 30" Water Une and FIttings $ 210 LF 7.900 '$ 1,659.000
Fumlsh &: Install 24" Water Un. and FIttings $ 160 LF 5.550 $ 888,000
Fumlsh &: Install 20M Water Line and Fittings $ 120 LF 2,750 $ 330.000
, Fumlah &: Install 16" Water Une and Fittings $ 80 LF 5,300 $ 424,000
Fumlsh &: In_II 12" Wate' Une and Flttlna. $ 52 LF 4,100 $ 213.000 '
Fumlsh &: Inatall 8" Water Une and Fittings $ 36 LF 8,900 $ 320,000
,Total Pic. Length 34,500
2 Trenchl.a. Construction of Raw Water Pipeline.
Jacked and Auaered 30" Water Main $ 600 eA 160 $ . . 108.000
Mlcrotunneled 30. Water Main $ 1,300 eA 600 $ 780.000
3 PavementlRlght-of-Wav Restor8tlon
Rebuild Lane and OVerlay Road $ 70 LF 100 $ 7.000
Finish Grade by Seedlna $ 1.25 SV 10.000 $ 13.000
FInish Grade bv Sodding $ 4 SV 5,000, $ 20,000
4 Wells $ 250.000 eA 23 $ 5.750.000
5 Wetland MltIgatlonIRestoration
Forested $ 80,000 AC 1.82 $ 145,500
Herbaceous $ 10.000 AC 0.91 $ 9,100
Subtotal (ConstructlonCost) $10,666,600
6 PrOperty Acquisition
Parent Parcels with takings (Admin,) $ 15,000 eA 62 $ 930,000
Perm.t easement Area .In FPL Corridor $ 37,500 AC 13.2 $ 493.300
Temp. Easement Area In FPL Corridor $ 22.500 AC 8.8 $ 197.300
Permanent, Easements ' '$ 75,000 AC 10.6 $ 795,500
TemDOrarv Easements $ 22,500 AC 7.1 $ 159,100
Well Sites ,Fee Simple $ 75,000 AC 1.3 $ 95,000
Well Sites TemDOrarv Easements $ 22,500 AC 1.9 $ 42,800
Subtotal (PropertY Acquisition) $ 2,713,000
7 Construction Contingency (to nearest $1000) 15 % $ 2,007,000
Total (to nearest $1000) $15,387,000
I'
II
Ii
I:
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
.'"
I
I
~:
I
I
1
I
I
Collier County Government
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 186 of 236
South County Regional Water Treabnent Plant
Reverse Osmosis Well Field Expansion
Cost Estimate
Alternative 2 - Le Buffs RoadIFP&L Corridor
Greeley and Hansen LLC
August 2002
Item Description Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost
1 Raw Water Pipelines In Ogen-cut Trench
Furnish & Install 30" Wa~r Line and Fittings $ 210 LF 12,100 $ 2,541,000
Furnish & Install 24" Water Line and Fittings $ 160 LF 9,800 $ 1.568,000
Furnish & Install 20" Water Line and Flttinas $ 120 LF 1,400 $ 168,000
Furnish & Install 16" Water Line and Fittinas $ 80 LF 5,450 $ 436.000
Furnish & Install 12" Water Line and Fittings $ 52 LF 2,650 $ 138,000
Furnish & Install 8" Water Line and Fittings $ ,36 LF 7,600 $ 274,000
Total PI"e Lenath 39,000
2 Trenchless Construction of Raw Water Pipelines
Jacked and Augered 30" Water Main $ . 600 EA 80 $ 48;000
Mlcrotunneled 30" Water Main $ 1,300 EA 500 $ 650,000
3 PavementlRlght-of-Way Restoration
Rebuild Lane and Overlay Road $ 70 LF 3,500 $ 245,000
Finish Grade by Seeding $ 1.25 SY 15,000 $ 19,000
Finish Grade bY Sodding $ 4 SY 8,000 $ 32,000
4 Wells $ 250,000 EA 23 $ 5,750,000
5 Wetland Mitigation/Restoration .
Forested $ 80,000 AC 4.25 $ 340,300
Herbaceous $ 10,000 AC 2.12 $ 21.200
Subtotal (Construction Cost) $ 12,230,500
6 PropertY Acauisltion
Parent Parcels with takings (Admin.) $ 15,000 EA 51 $ 765,000
Perm.t Easement Area In FPL Corridor $ 37,500 AC 7.4 $ 278.900
Temp. Easement Area in FPL Corridor $ 22,500 AC 5.0 $ 111.600
Permanent Easements $ 75,000 AC 11.1 $ 831.600
Temgorary Easements $ 22,500 AC 7.4 $ 166,400
Well Sites Fee SlmDle $ 75,000 AC 1.3 $ 95,000
Well Sites TemporarvEasements $ 22,500 AC 1.9 $ 42,800
Subtotal (Property Acquisition) $ 2,291,300
7 Construction Contlnaency (to nearest $1000) 15 % $ 2,178,000
Total (to nearest $1000) $ 16,700,000
II
"...,...
..
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
"......
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
/IfIIIL
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 187 of 236
Collier County Government
South County Regional Water Treatment Plant
Reverse Osmosis Wen Field Expansion
Cost Estimate
Alternative 3 .. County Road 951
:1.'.
Greeley and Hansen LLC
August 2002
Item De8crlptlon Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost
1 Raw Water Pipelines in Qperw:ut Trench
Furnish & Install 30" Water Line and FIttings $ 210 LF 10,600 $ 2,226,000
Furnish & Install 24" Water Line and Fittings $ 160 LF 5,300 $ 848,000
Furnish & Install 20. Water Line. and Fittings $ 120 LF 2,750 $ 330,000
Furnish & Install 16" Water Line and Flttlnas $ 80 LF 9,200 $ 738,000
Furnish & Install 12" Water Une and Fittings $ 52 LF 2,550 $ 133,000
Furnish & Install 8" Water Line and Flttlnas $ . 36 LF 8,200 $ 295,000
Total Pipe Length 38,800
2 Trenchles~ Construction of Raw Water Pipelines
Jacked and Auaered 30" Water Main $ 600 EA 180 $ 108,000
Mlcrotunneled 30" Water MaIn $ 1,300 EA 600 $ 780,000
3 PavementlRJght-of-Wav Restoration
Rebuild Lane and Overlav Road $ 70 LF 15,840 $ 1,109,000
Finish Grade by Seeding $ 1.25 SY 7,500 $ 9,000'
Finish Grade by Soddlna $ 4 SY 5,000 $ 20,000
4 Wells $ 250,000 EA 23 $ 5,750,000
5 Wetland Mltigation/RestQration
Forested $ 80,000 AC 0.90 $ 72,000
_ Herbaceous $ 10,000 AC 0.45 $ 4,500
Subtotal (Construction Cost) $12,420,500
6 PropertY ACQuisition .
Parent Parcels with takings (Admin.) $ 15,000 EA 34 $ 510,000
Penn.t Easement Area in FPL Corridor $ 37,500 AC 5.6 $ 211,800
Temp. Easement Area in FPL Corridor $ 22,500 AC 3.8 $ 84,800
Permanent Easements $ 75.000 AC 9.1 $ 681.800
Temporary Easements $ 22,500 AC 6.1 $ 136,400
Weil Sites Fee Simple $ 75,000 AC 1.3 $ 95,000
Well Sites Temporarv Easements $ 22,500 AC 1.9 $ 42,800
Subtotal (Property ACQuisition) $ 1,762,600
7 Construction Contingency (to nearest $1000) 15 % $ 2,127,000
Total (to n..rest $1000) $16,310,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 188 of 236
APPENDIX C
Alternative Route Evaluation Matrix
........
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
a"'..L.V AND HAN..N LLC
I'
,.....l
I:
,
I:
'I;
I
I
I
I
""....
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
,~
I
Jia..
....
I
....
z c
W 0
:s '0
W c
Z cu
0::'0.
~Jj
o:!:!
C)~
J=~
Zo
50::
Oil.
o::~
!::!:!o::
::io
oen
o
z
~
~
~
:>
~
~ ~
o:!
~ =
~~
~~
~
~
~
~
S
1:1
N
i
OIJ
~
:
- w
12 0 0:: 0 ...... 0 N <0 N ~ "lit <0 N CW')
cu 0 """ N ....
};n ~ U
::::10) S en
00:::
COt) ::::I
0 ~
~ 0:::
Q) Z N """ N N CW') N CW') .... .... N ....
CO ~
I
- '- W
"l:J 0 0::: 0 """ ~ ~ "lit N co co N CW') 0)
as ''''Cl 0 0 .... N .... """
o 'e ;:
0::: oF- U
~us en
::::I ..J ::::I
co~o ~
cull. 0::
..JL1.. Z N CW') CW') "lit N N N N N CW') CW')
'~
I
'- w
0 CD 0::: ~ co 0 co "lit N co N co CW') N
"'Cl 0 N CW') .... .... 't"'" 't"'" 't"'"
'E c
0 t)
0 en
t) S
..J ::::I
~ 0 ~
D.. 0::
L1.. Z "lit "lit CW') CW') N N N CW') CW') ('I') "lit
~
....0:::
::I: 0
C>t; It) ...... 0 <0 N 't"'" cn "lit <0 - CW')
-
~Lf
~ 6
:;:I
:a CIS
0)
~ .~ :e
< ~ :E .!!
ii: :a (I) c
.!'!! "0 UJ
w E
.... (I) 'iij c
c 8 as l!!
ii: :8 ~ i '5
t) J!! c
e - as !if
Z en c c c
B CI) ~ ~ S ~ 0::
0 en 'C
.~ 'en c as c
!;( c ! CD c;; 0. '2 :8
.!&! c en E c
0 ~i cu :s
::> -= i u w .S!2 e
~ u >:. "0 .s D.. ~
0) > ,l1 c
c c ~ IX ;! CIS c CD
~ 8 en ~ 0) Q)
c c c 0::
.5 ~ c ,.!. :8 CIS
UJ 0:: ~ ~ c 0::: l
J5 .s.! b '- e e e
l :is .e 0 0 .c Q) 'S: C)
'ar .21 c
::::I CIS ~ Q) 0. LD 0
D.. c- Cf) :E C- o:: 0 ..J Cf)
N M ~ Lri cO ,..: cO c;,; c:::i .
.... ....
't"'" ....
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 189 of 236
::::-
0) e
O)~
'..
....
"lit
"""
::::-
It) en
<0 Q)
":""CO
-
W
0:::
o
(.)
en
~
o
....
j
Q)
:5
en
c
:8
"lit
i2
;:
"lit ...
.s~
cu'
=L1..
0-'
Q).g,
~~
.. )(
~~
a c
o:::~
&11
e l!!
Q) 0
~~
., :
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item NO.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 190 of 236
APPENDIX D
Detailed Map of Recommended Route
'"
Route Study Report. August 2002.doc
August 2002
DIII..L.V AND HAN..N ~~c
I
""""'"
I
II
'I
I
I
I
'1
",.......
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.....
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
GlR......V ANI:I HAN..N ~~..
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 191 of 236
FIGURES
I Agenda Item No.1 DC
""---"
I 25
I
I 33 36 1
I
I 3
I
I
I
I '---
17 15 Ii 18
u
I
I
I
I
I w
I
ii
~ 35 36 31 (
I ~ 1
N
0 AREA OF APPARENT ADVANTAGEOUS
~
I roo- HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
0
-
t;
Ii: COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES -,
I ~
u SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL W. T.P.
u
~ GREELEY ANa HAN..N ....c WELL FIELD STUDY
AUGUST 2002
I
I
""....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.....
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
w
I
i3
~
.0
~ - ill
I ~ ~A '" :::J I
~~ oa - ~O
\ .1 F:::?'> y./ ^" fI' J 26 25
_.1 ~1t PK ]1ri~ ,.J ~
f2 mID. I
~ ~II~ I ~
.i.-- -4~
) ~
J ";;;7' ~ IL,J
- 'It-'
''''~SiA 11; J "''''. \-J
-'"
2 33 ..........:...... '.'1 I--- 35 36 1
/~~ ~ ~ l
" RADIO ROAD
-I-- ~ lL-
(C.R. 856) -I--
"'"
N \6-
t~ 0/ 3 2
__L ~ '"
o ,\lIS' BOULEVARD Ir r--.
~R 84) ROUT). --.- \. /. J ~
~ AREAVSOUND ~R 1''':::::;;- )
2
7 I-- g 1 9 1S ~
1- :f:-
~ "\1 ,/
CD V -
---- '1
- ~ ....
In
1 < qZ ill:: Ol 'Ld V ( ~
11.17 15 Ii 18
=~ -...J J . ..4) 0 ~
r. (.J ~ (,
.3- -
- AT E AM rR:~) li~ I '--=~
:; ~
J _ ...... c24 1C
~ .-/ 23 ---
-I)' ~ 1 r\~ ,.-- -
~ t"l V
I-.l U\,..J -,
" ~~ !l ""-.J -- ~ \:> ~
~~ ~ >"
, '" "" /5(,,/
~ /' tr 8 ~
30 H..'~ /~~
r; :-< ~; r--
c=~~ V35 /
~ 3
1 '\.' 1\ 34 36 31 (
...
N
o
GO
ROUTE STUDY AREA
....
o
~
u
COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES
SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL W.T.P.
WELL FIELD STUDY
AUGUST 2002
~ GIlIE.L.IIV ANCI HAN.EN &.&.1:
Agenda Item No, 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 194 of 236
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 195 of 236
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 196 of 236
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 197 of 236
II&J' 4 GF' ..
II! . . ......
. .............. .........-
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 198 of 236
>-
Ci
rrl
:;0
Z
~
<:
rrl
WAL- I I I I I I I I II I III I II I I II II I I r I I I I I I
~L.-- SOUTH COUNTY
t""' REGIONAL WATER
_ TREATMENT PlANT
~PROPOSED WELL
L- COlLECTION /oWN
--4 ~ S
~ ~~
~ I---i
~ r- 1 ~1ls1.q7t~~
~ ~:.z WHITE' lAKE BLVD.
HJ If I I_
II I I I ----r-:
ffi I I II TT b....
'" -
g ~I ~ ~CK BLvo. f;; ~= t::
ao z= t::
~ PROPOSED = c: ~= !=
- WELl. AND PROOUCnC I-l 5l l-
WELL SITE (lYP) -:il
I tJ ~ -
) ~
II 2 ~
-
~ .~ I--- -
~#} I---
~ -
U n
~ -
r- c::::J
....---
jt '-- - f0-
e') ~
?o i=L I
10 ::ll
~
PRO OSED
P~2 UcnON
~ WE SITE (lYP
lQ 1
= ~
~ ~ _ L.--
I---
-
ritb
I
~ - (----
I
~ ~ IT
o ~ T
01
....
."
-0
P:-
I
(')
o
:;0
:;0
o
o
:;0
t
CALE: ,"., 600'
DA..L.V AND HAN..N .....
SOUTH COUNiY REGIONAL WATER
TREATMENT PlANT
WELl. Srre: AND WELl. COLLECTION
/oWN ROUTE STUDY AUGUST 2002
::!l
g
:ll
....
c..o
Agenda Item No, 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 199 of 236
)>
~
I'Tl
::;0
Z
~
<
I'Tl
N
~ I I I 1 II I III I I II I III I I I III 1/ I I I I I 1
~ ____ SOUTH COUN'TY
Y REGIONAL WATER
;::= TREATMENT PLANT
=
- ~PROPOSED WELL
COLLECTION toWN
---A \. S
~rn liT ,r- -=
~ ~~
J i ~S~ UYHlTE LAKE: BLVD
Af 1- ~J- .
1 I II I --r-
If I II I If
-----::.;
BECK BLVD. M ~ --
/ ==
PROPOSED ~ :!I ==
- ~ e; ==
~J TEST WELL -
SITE ;0
""i i--
~~l ; ~
I .. ~
~ i~ - -
-
~ -
~ ~ U ~ if
~ i PROPOSED
r- c:::J
I-.- WELL SITE M P
Q - --
n ~
ju ~PROPOSED TEST I
co ~
~
WELL AND PRODUCTION
Jg WELL SITE (lYP)
~ ~ [
:::?J ~ --
I
i--
rtfb
~r -
!
'(--
~ 1
LE~ 1-
I
lAMM ~
0
r
I'Tl
ID
C
"T]
~
::;0
~
Cl
.........
"T]
\J
l<:>
r
()
o
::;0
:;0
Cl
o
::;0
t
CAl.E: 1".1600'
GIII..L.V AND MAN..N .....
SOUTH COUNlY REGIONAL WATER
TREATMENT PLANT
WELL SITE AND WELL COLLECTION
MAIN ROUTE STUDY AUGUST 2002
:!I
g
~
..,
...
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10. 2005
Page 200 of 236
)>
~
r'l
::0
Z
~
<:
r'l
(.,J
WJ::>l....- II I 111111111111111' II "" r I I I I I
~~ SOUTH COUNTY
'1:'" REGIONAL WATER
_' TREATMENT PLANT
~~ROPOSEO WELL
- COLLECTION t.4AlN
.A
~ I I IT"",,-- '- "'----'1;
~
a 1
----.!~ ~ WHITt lAKE SLVD.
Af II ____
t""Fl II H ----r- ~
------ BECK BLVD: ..... ~ ~f=
,..., ~~sro ~ rT1
to ~~
C ~ ~~
f--- ~ WELL AND PROOUcnc N ;;! ~ ~f-
WELL SITE (lYP) ~
':I: I-
J J~ l!
-
L ~ ::0
J'. ~
~ <.r - I--
V~ l-
i(,
~o -
~ D 1
~ ----
~
..... c:=J
s::l l-- - -
n ll'"
10 -;::-
'" ::0 i=7
~
PRO OSED
P~~ UCTlON
WE SITE (lYP
~ 1
,
-../] - --
-
-
~
I( I
~ 1
LESNAKE 1 ~
"..".~
0
OJ
",
()
^
OJ
<
o
"'-
()
::0
(0
01
-"
t
SCALE: '""'600'
......L.V AND HAN..N ......
SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER
TREATMENT PLANT
WELL SITE AND WELL COLLECTION
UAlN ROUTE STUDY AUGUST 2002
~
'"
C
::0
I'T'I
III
I
Agenda Item NO.1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 201 of 236
~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Wellfield Design and Pennitting for South County Regional Water
Treatment Plant Reverse Osmosis Expansion to 20MGD
".....
Well Site Investigation
Technical Memorandum
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a1A..L.V AND HAN..N ....0
November 2003
......
Well Site Justification Study. November 2003.doc
I
a.......v AND HAN..N ~~..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 202 of 236
COllIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Wellfie1d Design and Permitting for South County Regional Water Treatment Plant
Reverse Osmosis Expansion to 20MGD
Well Site Investigation
Technical Memorandum
I3R..L.V ANC HAN..N LLC
November 2003
TABLE OF CONmNTS
Section
Title
Page
1.
INTRODUCTION ........... ......................................................... ......................................................... ........1
1.1 Background and Purpose .............................................................................................................1
1.2 Scope of Investigations .................... ............................... .......................................... ..... ........... ....1
1.3 Well Site Selection Methodology.................................................................................................1
2.
Justification for Well Site Selection.... ...... ......................................................................... .......... .............. 2
2.1 Introduction..... ........................ .............. .................. ....... ....... ........ ............. ....... ...... ................... .... 2
2.2 Well Site Area .......... ................. .............................. .... ...................................................... .... .......... 2
2.3 Site Selection Criteria ............................................ ............................................................... ......... 2
2.3.1 Cost ........ ............ ....................... ................................... ....................... ................................ ............. 3
2.3.2 Environmental Impact/Wetla.nds Mitigation.... ..... ............................................................. ...... 3
2.3.3 Safety..................................................... ............ ............... ...... ........ ....... ..........................................3
2.3.4 Permitting ........ ............................................. ..... ...... ...... ....................... ........................ .................. 3
2.3.5 Long Range Planning ................. ...................... ................ ............. ................... ............................. 3
2.3.6 Operation and Maintenance Accessibility .................................................................................3
3.
Alternative Well Site Locations.. ... ...... ..... ...... ............ ................................................................................ 3
3.1 General... ....... ..... ................ ............. .... ......... ..... ..................... ................ ............. ................. ........... 3
3.2 Decision Matrix Form .................................................................................................................. 7
3.3 Rating the Well Sites Against Criteria......................................................................................... 7
4.
RECOl\1l\ffiNDED WEll SImS.............. ................... ...... ............. ................ ...................................... 7
APPENDICES
A. Well Site Rankings (Site Selection Matrix Results)
B. Maps of Alternative Well Sites
Well Site Justification Study. November 2003.doc
1lI"'..L.V AND HAN..N LLC
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 203 of 236
COllIER COUNtY GOVERNMENT
Wellfield Design and Permitting for South County Regional Water Treatment
Plant Reverse Osmosis Expansion to 20MGD
Well Site Investigation
Technical Memorandum
I3R..L.V ANCI HAN..N ......c
November 2003
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Badqv'ound and Pw;:pose
The purpose of this memorandum is to identify possible locations for proposed well
sites required for the South County Regional Water Treatment. Plant (SCRWTP) Well Pidd
Expansion project., to document the methods used to select these sites, and to provide final
recommendations for the locations of the well sites. These wells will be util.ized to provide raw
water for the SCRWI"P reverse osmosis expansion to 20 million gallons per day (MGD). The
raw water requirements for the plant "expansion include 16 MGD for treatment to provide an
additional 12 MGD of finished water plus an additional 20 percent to meet the County's
reliability requirements. Each well will be designed to provide 700 gallons per minute (1 MGD)
of water. Therefore, the minimum required number of wells for the 12 MGD SCRWI"P
expansion is 20 wells. Twenty-three well sites have been investigated in this study.
1.2 Scope of Investigations
Greeley and Hansen LLC is the consultant charged with the completion of the well site
investigation. Water Resource Solutions (WRS) is advising on the apparent suitability of the well
sites from a water production and water use permitting purview. The investigations presented
herein comprise the following principle elements:
. Acquire and develop basic information needed for the well site selection
process;
. Develop alternative well locations;
. Evaluate and compare the alternatives;
. Develop recommended well locations based on the results of these
investigations.
1.3 Well Site Selection MethodolQiY
The methodology employed to identify the recommended locations for the well sites
consists of the following major elements:
. Focus on areas that are hycirogeologically and environmentally advantageous;
. Identify 23 potential well sites and alternatives for each one;
. Select engineering, regulatory, long range planning, safety and other non-cost.criteria against which all potential well sites are evaluated and compared;
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
GI"'......v AND HAN..N ~~..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 204 of 236
· Evaluate the pennitability and constructability of the alternative locations in the
field;
· Weigh the selected criteria for this project;
· Develop and compare cost estimates for the sites; and
· Identify the recommended well sites, considering all of the above.
The recommended locations for the well sites will be determined by taking all of the
selection criteria into account and may not necessarily be the least expensive in situations where
environmental protection, safety or other considerations override cost.
2 JUSTIFICATION FOR WELL SITE SELECTION
2.1 Introduction
Greeley and Hansen ILC identified 23 potential well locations with alternatives. All of
the potential locations were evaluated based on six criteria: Cost, Environmental
Impacts/Wetlands Mitigation, Safety. Permitting. Long Range Planning and Operation and
Maintenance Accessibility. Following the evaluations. all of the potential locations and their
alternatives were compared against one another using a site selection matrix form (Appendix A).
which will be discussed in detail later in this memorandum.
2.2 Well Site Area
Each well site will require a minimum 4Q-foot by 50-foot pennanent easement and will
be surrounded by a chain-link fence. Equipment for each well site consists of a well pump.
standpipe, electrical panel, and necessary fittings connecting the well to the transmission main.
Five of the twenty-three well sites are required to have back-up generators in the event of a
power failure. and will need a 4Q-foot by 60-foot easement.
Based on studies by WRS. the well sites should be located at least one-thousand feet
apart. The ideal well site location would be as close to the transmission main as possible, in a
location that is easily accessible. and in a location that is safe. The ideal location would also be in
an up-land area, unoccupied by native species, and partially cleared to minimize environmental
impact associated with developing the site. Finally. an ideal well site would be compatible with
planned future development. Florida Power and Light (FP&L) has conceptually approved the
buried transmission main to be located within their easement, however due to the proposed
above ground appurtenances and use of the well sites and their possible proximity (<100 feet) to
existing and proposed FP&L utilities, well sites were not able to be located within the FP&L
easement. It is also recommended by the South Florida Management Water District (SFWMD)
not to locate well sites in areas designated as Environmental Conservation Easements (CEs).
2.3 Site Selection Criteria
The 23 potential well sites and their alternatives were evaluated using evaluation criteria
and a decision matrix. These criteria can be described as the most relevant issues with regard to
justifying the chosen locations of the well sites. Similar criteria were used in the route selection
for the transmission main. The site selection criteria are briefly described as follows:
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
mR..L.V AND HAN..N ....0
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 205 of 236
-
2.3.1 ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Cost/benefit analysis of the proposed site location is an important criteria. Estimates of
costs associated with land acquisition for the well sites, development of the sites, construction of
supply lines between the wells and the transmission main, and construction access to the sites
were considered. For example, well sites located further from the transmission main typically
have higher associated construction costs. and will also require additional pumping costs to
maintain system hydraulics.
2.3.2 Environmental Irnpact/Wedands MiQa-ation
Properties with wetlands and native vegetation species may require additional permitting
efforts and additional site development for mitigation. Not only does this contribute to the
destruction of native wildlife habitat and natural wetlands. but these factors also contribute to
increased costs.
2.3.3 ~
Public and worker safety are always a primary consideration in any project regardless of
the site location.
2.3.4 Pf'nnitring
"....
Permitting requirements for each well site may increase cost and delay construction due
to agency review time and comment periods. public notification, and public hearings.
2.3.5 Lo~ Range Planning
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Long range planning and development is a significant consideration for selecting well
sites. Properties where planned future development is unlikely or impractical are preferred to
ensure the well sites will remain isolated and undisturbed.
2.3.6 Operation and Maintenance Acce.8iblli~
The well sites require monthly inspection and periodic maintenance to ensure proper
operation. This is especially important for those well sites equipped with emergency generators.
3 ALTERNATIVE WELL SITE LOCATIONS
3.1 General
As previously mentioned. 23 potential well sites and their alternatives were identified
and evaluated based on field observations and review of collected data. The following list
identifies all of the proposed well site locations. which are located on the Well Site Location
Maps in Appendix B:
Well Site Number 1:
· Located approximately 350 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL Easement and
175 feet South of Beck Boulevard within the SFWMD right-of-way. No alternative sites
.JIII'-
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
I
m"......v AND HAN..N LLQ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 206 of 236
for this well are required since this is an existing well in the SFWMD right-of-way.
(Figure 1)
Well Site Number 2:
· Located approximately 925 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL Easement
and 200 feet South of Beck Boulevard within the SFWMD right-of-way. No alternative
. sites were developed for well site number 2 since this well site is within.the SFWMD
right-of-way and will not require an easement. (Figure 1)
Well Site Number 3:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 1.050 feet West of the western boundary of the
FPL Easement and 125 feet East of County Road 951 within the SFWMD right-of-way.
(Figure 2)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 950 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement within the Northwest corner of Folio Number 00410680007. (Figure 2)
· Alternative 3: Located on eastern boundary of the FPL Easement approximately 325
feet South of Forest Glen Boulevard within Folio Number 32720000387. (Figure 2)
Well Site Number 4:
· Alternative 1: Located on eastern boundary of the FPL Easement approximately 195
feet South of Northwest corner of Folio Number 00410840009. (Figure 2)
· Alternative 2: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 00410680007. (Figure 2)
Well Site Number 5:
· Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along South edge of
Folio Number 00410680007. (Figure 2)
· Alternative 2: Located on eastern boundary of the FPL Easement approximately 100
feet South of Northwest corner of Folio Number 00410640005. (Figure 2)
Well Site Number 6:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 75 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL
Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00411640005. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 75 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL
Easement along North Edge of Folio Number 004118??oo6. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 3: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 00410760008. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 7:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 1,250 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 004118??oo6. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00411640005. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 8:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 2.500 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00411800006. (Figure 3)
WeIl Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
G.....L.V AND HAN..N ~~..
I
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 207 of 236
,...
. Alternative 2: Located approximately 2.500 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00411640005. (Figure 3)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Wen Site Number 9:
. Alternative 1: Located approximately 925 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement along the Northwest corner of Folio Number 00411520001. (Figui:e 3)
. Alternative 2: Located approximately 925 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement along the Southwest corner of Folio Number 00411800006. (Figu1'e 3)
Well Site Number 10:
. Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 0041100??oo. (Figure 3)
. Alternative 2: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement aloog South edge of
Folio Number 00411520001. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 11:
. Alternative 1: Located approximately 120 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL
Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417200008. (Figure 3)
. Alternative 2: Located approximately 120 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL
Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00411800006. (Figure 3)
",...,
Well Site Number 12:
. Alternative 1: Located approximately 1,100 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417200008. (Figure 3)
. Alternative 2: Located approximately 1,100 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00411800006. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 3: Located approximately 1,290 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417320001. (Figure 3)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Well Site Number 13:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 2,500 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417040006. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 2,450 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417680000. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 14:
· Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along South edge of
Folio Number 00418400302. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located on eastern boundary of the FPL Easement along South edge of
Folio Number 00417200008. (Figure 3)
....
Well Site Number 15:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 2.490 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417600006. (Figure 3)
. Alternative 2: Located approximately 2.450 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00417480006. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 3: Located approximately 2.490 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00417040006. (F~e 3)
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
I
ca....L..v ANa HAN..N LLG
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 208 of 236
Well Site Number 16:
· Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement approximately 60
feet South of the North edge of Folio Number 00418280001. (Figure 4)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 100 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL
Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00418400001. (Figure 4) .
Well Site Number 17:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00416960006. (Figure 4)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00416920004. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 18:
· Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 00417720009. (Figure 4)
· Alternative 2: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along South edge of
Folio Number 00416800001. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 19:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 940 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement along the Southwest corner of Folio Number 00417720009. (Figure 4)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 940 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement along the Northwest comer of Folio Number 00417400002. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 20:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 2.390 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00434080007. (Figure 4)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 940 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement along the Northwest corner of Folio Number 00433360003. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 21:
· Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 00433360003. (Figure 4)
· Alternative 2: Located on eastern boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 00434160008. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 22:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00434120006. (Figure 4)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 1,100 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00434160008. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 23:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00416960006. (Figure 4)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 1.050 feet West of the western boundary of the
FPL Easement along c.R. 951 within the SFWMD right-of-way. (Figure 4)
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
-.
1lI....L..v AND HAN..N LLC
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 209 of 236
--
....
. Alternative 3: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417000004. (Figure 4)
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
The above alternatives for each well site were compared to one another in order to
determine which site would be best suited for the project according to the site selection criteria
described in Section 2.3.
3.2 Decision Matrix Fonn
The decision matrix form is a comparative method, which provides a systematic
approach to identifying the most appropriate location of the proposed sites discussed in Section
2. This was a.ccomplished by combining known information about the proposed well sites aod
ranking the sites based on the site selection criteria and the site's relative importance to the
overall success of the project. The results of the site selection criteria weightings are shown in
the evaluation matrix (Appendix A).
3.3 Ra~g the Well Sites Aallinllt Criteria
....-.
All 23 potential, well sites and their alternatives were compared. Each well site was rated
against all six site selection criteria on a scale of 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent). The resulting products
(criteria weight X rating) were summed to obtain a total score for each potential well site. The
potential well site with the highest total score represents the recommended well site based on the
identified criteria.
"-
4 RECOMMENDED WELL SITES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The following well sites are recommended for the SCRWI'P Wellfield expansion based
on the six evaluation criteria as outlined and described in Section 2.3. Examples of the selection
criteria weighting matrix and the well site rank evaluation are located in Appendix A.
-,
Well Site Alternative Folio Number Rank/ Out Of
Number
1 SFWMD R.O.W. 00415840004 N/A
2 SFWMD R.O.W. 00415840004 N/A
3 3 32720000222 67/80
4 1 00410840009 62/80
5 2 00410640005 57/80
6 2 00411800006 68/80
7 1 00411800006 58/80
8 1 00411800006 58/80
9 2 00411800006 63/80
10 1 00411520001 56/80
11 2 00411800006 71/80
12 2 00411800006 63/80
13 1 00417040006 63/80
14 2 00418400302 62/80
15 3 00417040006 65/80
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
I
G"__L.V ANa HAN..N ....
I
I
I
;1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 210 of236
Well Site Altemative Folio Number Rank/Out Of
Number
16 2 00418400001 53/80
17 1 00416960006 61/80
18 2 00416800001 58/80
19 1 00417720009 56/80
20 2 00433360003 61/80
21 1 00433360003 58/80
22 2 00434160008 53/80
23 2(SFWMD 00415840004 71/80
R.O.W.)
The folio numbers in the table above and their corresponding descriptions from Section
3.1 represent the recommended well sites for the SCWRTP Reverse Osmosis Wellfield
Expansion to 20 MGD.
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
ca....L.V AND HAN..N LL"
r
II
!
. "....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Jf/J-
I
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 211 of 236
APPENDIX A
Well Site Rankings
(Site Selection Matrix Results)
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
ClFl..L.V AND HAN..N ~~"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;
~N tu
a::: It) It) co 0) CO~
=!tN ..... ..... .....
O)N 0
>0 U
:cO CJ)
a:J0
E~
,s"'"
<(~ tl
tl
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
tl
tl
tl
N,.... W
=!to a::: 0 to N CO CO M
~8 0 .... ..- .....
.- co ~
.....co
a:J0
E_ .
.s~ ~
<(8 ~ N M ~ N ~ M
.
.
tl
.....~ W
~ to 0 co N CO ~
=!to ..- N .....
0)0
>0 U
:c~ CJ)
a:JtO
E.... t
.s~ ~
~o Z ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~
~
1-.
:La:::
(!)o to It) ~ M N ..-
-I-
w~
~u.
c:
0 ~
:c
a:J :c
g en
~ :E (/)
ii: en ~
"'C
W c:
I- a:J B
~ ii: ;:l
=It 0) c:
0) U ~ a:J
..... Z g c:
i:i5 0 oS
~ c:
Q) ~ '2 "to
~ E c: ~
:J a:J
~ cu a.. "'C
- ~ c:
c: a:J
Q) g c:
E c:
a:J 0
c: ~ == a::: :c
- e .~ g f!!
en 'S; - Q)
0 c: a:J Q) 0 0-
U W CJ) a.. -I 0
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 212 of 236
-
"'C
0)
"'C
c:
Q)
l'"- E
CO E
8
~
-
-,
C\I
It)
It)
co .....
N
'0
.....
~ Q)
0)
'C: a:J
0 D-
'C:
0-
-
en
0).....
.s::en
O)Q)
.- .c
.s::Q)
O).s::
.s::-
.....0)
O)c:
c: .-
W .- 0)
O).c
a::: .c~
0 I().s::
U ==::
CJ) 'i ~ ....
-I It)'''t"-B
g o .9 a:J
-.....u.
I- ..---
_o.s::
o Q) .~
0)-0)
-a:J~
a:J (.)
(.) CJ) ><
(/J..~
..: ~ c:
S a:J a:J
CJa:::a:::
~ Q) II
_ 0) ~
.s:: f!!
.2> Q) 8
O)~CI)
~4O : ""'
. . .
I
,,-..-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
t
~~ w (0
c:: It) 0 (0 (0 .q-
0 0 ...... ...... ......
~o 0
:=m en
cao
E...... ~
S~
<0 ~ ('t) C\I .q- C\I ('t) .q-
.
t
......0) W
c:: It) It) (0 0) .q- ('t)
:tto ...... ...... ......
0 0
~o 0
:=~ en
cao
E...... .
S~ ~
<0 ~ ('t) ('t) .q- ('t) N ('t)
1-.
J:O::
(!)O It) It) .q- ('t) N ....
-I-
wO
;:jf
c:
0 ~
:=
ca :0
~ '0
~ ~ II)
~
0:: en
"t:l
LU c:
l- ca 8
; C2 ~
0 c:
S ~ ca
Z c:
en go s
0 ~ c:
1) ~ '2 'm
;: E c: ::!:
:::> ca
~ s a: "t:l
~ c:
c: ca
(I) g c:
LU E c:
ca 0
c: I~ :e 0:: :=
..... E .~ g. ~
en 'S; .... 8-
8 c: ca (I) 0
w en c. ..J 0
JI'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
JII-
I
,...
It)
i
"t:l
c:
(I)
N E
(0 E
~
0::
-
w
0::
o
o
en
~
o
I-
~
"C
o
'C
Q.
1i)
(1)-
.cll)
.~.8
.cO)
(1):5
:5Ol
Clc:
C .-
.- 0)
,8.0
It).q-
:5:5
.- 'i '-
3: .q- 0
It) ts
o.sca
-....u-
....--
_o.c
o Q)'~
(I) - (I)
-5;:
5 en ><
en..o.J'
L.:~c:
.s ca ca
u 0:: 0::
If (I) II
..... Ol lU
.c:~1:;.
.~ (I) 8
(I)~en
;:. :
. . .
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 213 of 236
....
N
'0
N
(I)
Ol
ca
C.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tI
to
tI
Nit) W
0::: It) 0 CO en ~ M
:;to 0 ~ ..... ~
0
~O (,)
=~ en
"'0
E~ to
.s~ tI
:::.:::
<Co ~ M N V M N M
tI
tI
tI
~'" W
:;to 0::: It) 0 CO CO CO M
0 0 ~ ~ .....
~O (,)
:;:100 en
",CO
E~ 1:
~~ :::.:::
<(0 Z M N ~ N M M
~
1-0::
:1:0
GI- It) It) oo;t M N ~
-(,)
W<(
3:LL.
t:
0 ~
:;:I
'" :.c
.9
- "ii5
<( ~ rn
0::: u.l ~
"'0
W t:
I- '" B
It) 0:: =
~ Q) t:
~ (,) ~ '"
z .~ c:
en CD
0 -
~ t:
Q) !;( t: 'm
3: .s t: ~
::> '"
...J n; a.. "'0
~ - ~ t:
t: '"
CD ~ t:
E t:
'" 0
t: I~ = 0:: :;::;
~ .~ g ~
iii 'S: .... 8-
o t: '" Q) 0
uw en a.. ...J 0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 214 of 236
'"",
-
"0
Q)
"0
t:
Q)
'" E
It)E
8
CD
0::
-
CO
It) ~
N
'5 -'0'
M
~ Q)
0)
"C '"
0 a..
'C
Q.
-
CI)
~iii
.23 .!
J::.CD
CD:5
:50)
O)t:
t: .-
W "- CD
CD.c
0::: .cv
0 1t):5
u
en € ';e ...
~ ~ v 0
1t)0tJ
0-'"
0 -~LL.
I- ~--
_oJ::.
o Q).23
CD - CD
-B3:
~ en x
en..~
L.: ~ t:
.scoco
o 0::: 0:::
'" CD II
LL.O)
-",~
J::....8
.23 CD
CD~en
3: to t -", i
to to to
I
,-
:
~CO W co
" It) I.(') (\I') co N
:*1::0 0 ..... .....
0
~o U
.- CO en
-1"0-
tOo
E......
(l)oq-
-0 ~
<0
z ~ ..... oq- ...... oq- C\I
~
:
.
C\lCO W
0::: 0 I.(') CO CO CO ~
:*1::0 C\I ..... ......
0 0
~8 u
:::l en
mCO
E;: ~
Soq-
<8 ~ oq- ~ oq- N oq- ~
i
.....1.(') W
0::: 0 I.(') CO (\I') CO C\I
:*1::0 0 ..... ......
(1)0
>0 U
~~ en
E;: .
s~ ~
<0 z C\I ...... oq- ...... ~ C\I
~
1-.
J:O:::
(,!)O I.(') I.(') oq- ~ N .....
-I-
wU
~~
c:
0 ~
:::l
m :is
.9
- '0
<( ~ 0
c:: 0 ~
"C
W c:
?- m 8
i 0::: -=
CI) c:
S u ~ m
z c
Ci5 g S
0 ~ c:
-a; ~ "2 .tij
~ E c: :E
::) co
~ !!l 0:: "C
~ c:
c: co
~ g c: c:
co 0
c: I~ :e " ~
e .~ g f!
iii 'S: ... 8-
o c co Q) ..9
UW en c.. 0
~
I
il
I
I
I
I
I
r>-
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
".-
~
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10,2005
Page 215 of 236
0)
oq-
:g
"C
c:
CI)
coE
COE
8
~
-
C\I
oq- .,..
C\I
'0
oq-
~ CI)
0)
'C: co
0 c..
'C
Co
-
0
CI)-
..c: 0
.~ ..8
..c: Q)
Q)~
=0)
O)c
c: .-
W .- Q)
Q).Q
" .Qoq-
0 1.(')=
U ..c: ':is
en j ~
~ oq-,S
1.(')00
o - co
-......U-
I- ::'O:E
o Q) "~
CI) - Q)
-~~
Benx
en...::e,
.. .::e, c:
o i co
ts"o:::
~ (I) II
_ 0) ~
..c:f!
.~ ~ 8
Q)<(CI)
~: :
. .
I
I
I
il
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
...
...
...
~~ W
0:: 0 10 CO ('I') CO N
Q)O 0 ..... .....
>0 ()
;~ en
CUo
E..... ...
Sv ~
<8 ~ N ..... V ..... ('I') N
...
...
...
....co w
0:: 10 0 co co co ('I')
~o 0 ..... ..... .....
Q)O
>0 ()
;0 en
cuCO
E;: ...
sv ~
<8 ~ ('I') N V N V ('I')
....'"
:to::
GO 10 10 V ('I') N .....
-I-
W()
3:~
c
0 ~
;
cu :is
.21
- '0
<C ::iE (I)
0:: (I) ~
"C
W c
I- cu B
I"- a:: ;r
~ CD C
S () ~ cu
Z c
Ci5 0 .~ S
~ c
Ci) ~ c .(tj
3: E c ~
::> cu
...J C6 c.. "C
~ C ~ c
C'O
Q) g. c
LU E c
C'O 0
C ~ E a:: ;
- ~ 'g ~ e
(I) '> .... Q)
0 c C'O Q) 0 c..
() w en c.. ..J 0
N
V
-
't:l
Q)
"C
C
CD
coE
It) E
8
CD
0::
-
W
0::
o
()
en
..J
~
o
I-
~
'J::
o
'C
c..
-
(I)
Q)-
.c (I)
.~~
.c Q)
~:5
-Ol
OlC
C .-
'05 .8
.ov
10:5
:5 'i
'i"l:t.8
100(,)
O-a!
-.....IL.
.....--
_o.c
o Q) .~
Q') - Q)
- ~ 3:
~en><
en..~
L.; '2 C
,Scua!
(,)0::0::
~ Q) II
_OlQ)
.cC'O!;;.
Ol'-8
.- Q)
Q)~en
3:... :
... ... ...
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 216 of 236
.....
N
'0
10
Q)
Ol
cu
a.
_. ..~. _. H_' .___. _
I
,..-
~
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
".--
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.--
"
I
.
.
~8 r.u
ex: 0 Ll) (0 ('I) (0 C'l
0 .... ....
~o ()
:!:IC\I en
co ('I)
E:: to
~g ~
~ C'l .... ~ .... ('I) C\I
:
....co w
ex: Ll) 0 (0 (0 CO ('I)
~o 0 "'" "'" ....
Q)O
>0 ()
:;;il en
E:: to
S~ ~
<0 ~ ('I) C\I ~ C\I ~ ('I)
1-.
:I: ex:
(!)O Ll) It) ~ ('I) C\I ....
wt>
~Lt:
c:
0 ~
:;::l
CO :0
g "~
<( ~
0::: en 8
"tJ ~
W c:
I- CO 8
i 0::: :I
() Q) c:
S ~ co
Z g c:
en 0 .s
a c:
Q) ~ "2 "ai
~ E c: :E
::> co
~ .s ii: "tJ
~ c:
c: co
Q) g c:
E c:
CI:l 0
c: I~ == 0::: :;::l
..... e E g !
U) '> .... Q)
0 c: CI:l If 0 Q.
() UJ en ....I 0
C'l
~
-
"tJ
Q)
"tJ
c:
Q)
~ E
E
8
~
-
w
c::
o
()
en
~
o
I-
b
'C
o
'C
Co
-
U)
~1iS
.~.8
.c: II)
1I).c:
=-
ag>
c .-
.- .8
.8~
Ll).c:
=-
'i "i '-
It)~~
o .e CI:l
-....LL
"'"--
_o.c:
o II) .g.l
Q)-Q)
-B~
Benx
en....lll:
.. ..lll: C
sC:co
_co,...
(..)0:::....
If II) II
..... C) II)
.c:!1:.
,g.l Q) 8
lI)~en
~. t
to .. to
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 217 of 236
....
C\I
-
o
(0
Q)
a
co
a.
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
:
Q1~ w
IX: 10 10 N C>> CO ~
Q)O 0 -- -- --
>0 U
.- 0 (fJ
-CO
CIl__
E__ ~
.sa~
<(0 ~ M M M ('I) ~ ~
.
.
.
W
---- 0::: 0 10 N CD CO 'lit
;1:0 0 -- ..... .....
~8 ()
:eN (fJ
CIllO
E..... .
Q).....
<~ ~
~ N ('I) M N M ~
1-.
J:O:::
C)O 10 10 ~ ('t) N --
-I-
W~
3:u.
e:
0 ~
:e
CO :.0
~ '0
~ ~ rn
~
0::: rn
"0
W e:
I- CIl B
i 0::: ;::l
U Q) C
~ ~ CIl
Z e:
i:i5 0 g .sa
~ C
Q) ~ '2 "ffi
3: E e: :E
:::::> CIl
..J oS c: "0
~ ~ c:
e: Cll
Q) go
w E e: e:
CIl 0
C ~ = 0:: :=
- e "g ~ e
en 'S;: .... 8-
0 e: CIl Q) 0
u w rn a.. ..J 0
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 218 of 236
-
"0
Q)
"0
C
Q)
ME
CDE
8
Q)
0:::
-
M
10 --
N
.....
0
,...
~ Q)
C)
'C CIl
0 a..
'e:
c.
-
en
Q)-
.z:: rn
.~.8
.c: Q)
Q):5
:50)
Ole:
e: .-
W 'CD .8
0::: .o~
0 1O.z::
U :5-
(fJ 'i'~ ...
..J 1O~.g
~ o.sco
0 -.....u.
I- ..........-
.....o.c
o CD ,S;!)
Q)-Q)
-B3:
Brnx
rn..~
.. .lll:: e:
se:co
_coo:::
uo:::
Lf Q) II
_O)Q)
.z::e8
.~ Q)
Q)~rn
3:. : '"
. . oil
I
.......
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
t
.
~g w
" U') 0 CO CO CO ('t)
0 ..... ..... .....
Cl)0
~g U
ctl..... en
E..... .
~8 ~
~ ('t) C\I ~ C\I ('t) Ct)
t
.
..... ..... W
=It:g " U') 0 CO CO CO ('t)
0 ..... ..... .....
~o U
, C\I en
ctlU')
E:: .
.s~ ~
<0 ~ ('t) C\I 'lit C\I Ct) ('t)
....
::I: "
(!)O U') U') 'lit Ct) C\I .....
-...
wU
3:~
I::
0 ~
==
ctl :s
g 'in
~ ~ en
B
" en
"0 ~
W I::
0 ... ctl B
..... " 15
:tt: I::
U ~ ctl
S z g. I::
(j) 0 .s
~ ~ 'c I::
1) E I:: '(5
;: :;) ctl :E
-' S a: "0
~ ~ I::
I:: ctl
CI) g I::
E I::
ctl 0
I:: I~ = " =
..... e .~ g e
~ "50 .... 8-
I:: ctl CI) 0
U w en ll. -' 0
Ill'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,....
I
co
U')
-
"0
CI)
"0
I::
CI)
~E
E
8
~
'-"
UJ
"
o
U
en
g
...
~
'1::
o
'1:
0..
-
en
CI)-
.een
aCl)
.- .c
J::.CI)
CI):5
:50)
ac
c'-
.- ~
!'lIt
U'):5
:5 'C;;:
.~ ,. ~
U')'lIt~
o .9 ctl
-.....u-
.....--
'00,&
CI) .-
CI) - CI)
-5;:
B CI) )(
CI)".::t:,
....lIl::
.... I:: I::
o t'tl <<l
'tS""
~ CI) II
_ C) CI)
J:e8~
,2> CI)
CI)~en
3:. t
. . .
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 219 of 236
.....
C\I
'0
co
CI)
fl
ll.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'"
'"
'"
~~ w co
c:: Il) 0 en CXl (t)
0 0 ~ N ~
~O 0
:z:J0 C/)
COCXl
E;: '"
,SC!; ~
<0 ~ (t) 'I:t 'I:t (t) 'I:t (t)
'"
'"
'"
~CIO W CO
c:: 0 0 CO CO (t)
=1*:0 0 ~ ~ ~
Q)O
>0 0
.- 0 C/)
-N
CO,....
E~ '"
,S'I:t ~
<8 ~ N N 'I:t N (t) (t)
1-'"
:r:0::
~o Il) Il) 'I:t (t) N .....
-I-
wO
~~
e:
0 ~
:c
co :.0
.2l
- 'ii)
~ ~ (/)
~
c:: (/)
-a
W e:
~ I- co B
~ 0:: :;::I
=I*: Q) e:
0 ~ ClS
~ Z .~ e:
Ci5 0 ~
! e:
Q) ~ e: 'm
E e: ::E
~ ::::> ClS
~ (5 c: -a
- ~ e:
e: ClS
Q) go e:
E e:
co 0
e: ~ E 0:: :c
- e 'E g ~
(/) 'S: ..- ... Q)
0 e: ClS Q) 0 c.
0 W C/) 0- ....J 0
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 220 of 236
""'"
-
-a
Q)
-a
e:
CI)
..... E
,.... E
8
~
-
.....
Il) ~
N
-
0 ""
en
b Q)
C)
't: ClS
0 c..
't:
c.
-
(/)
Q)-
.s::: (/)
OlQ)
.- .0
.s:::Q)
~=
- C)
Ole:
e: ,-
W .- Q)
0:: .,8.0
0 1l)'I:t
0 .s:::
.s:::-
C/) l'~ ...
....J 1l)'I:t~
<C
I- O.9ClS
0 -~LL
I- .....--
_o.s:::
o Q)'~
Q) - CI)
-B;:
B en x
C/)",:s:
.. .:.:: e:
6 e: ClS
_ClSe::
00::
ClS Q) II
LLC)
-ClS~
.s:::",o
.!2'l Q) 0
Q)~C/)
~ '" : "
'" '" '"
I
-
.
.
..
w
s:z....Oo::: OONCOCON
-00............
~O()
;eNCI)
CUM
E~
II) V
~ O.
~O~
ZNNMNMN
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
W
~ COo 0::: LC) LC) CO CO CO M
-00............
~Oc..>
:j::OCl)
CUClO
E:::.
.S3~~
<CO~MMVNVM
.
.
W
:;:COO:::OOCDCOCDN
-00.............
~ 8 c..>
=NC/)
CUI"'-
E;..
.so~
<cOZNNVNMN
~
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-0::
J:o
C> I- LC) LC) v M N ....
w~
3:u.
N
.....
=It
S
CiS
Q)
3:
......
I
~
0:::
W
I-
0:::
c..>
Z
o
!;(
;:)
~
c:
8 ~
.~ :c
E .~
~ ~
~ 8
II) c:
~ ~j
~ .5 c:
E ~ ~
1ti 0:"0
- c:
c: ~cu
~ gC:5
c: ~~=
- J~ ~'g ~ ~
~~tOII)508.
c..>WCl)Q....J
CO
V
i
"0
c:
II)
M E
CO E
8
~
-
o
L()
~
'C:
o
'1:
Q.
W
0:::
o
()
CI)
g
I-
-
U)
~U)
.2'~
.s::. Q)
11)=
=en
enc
I: .-
.- CD
II).Q
.cv
L()=
.s::. 'C::
j:oot..
L()v~
.s.scu
.....u.
.... - -
_o.s::.
o Q) .2'
II) - II)
-~3:
~ CI) ><
C/)",X
..~c:
o c CU
ts~o:::
CU Q) II
u.en
-cue
.s::.t..8
.2' Q)
II)~CI)
~ t E
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 221 of 236
.....
N
'5
o
....
Q)
en
cu
Q..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
to
:
~g w N
0:: 0 It) <0 <0('1')
(1)0 0 ..... ..... .....
>0 U
~co en
('Ofe
E..... to
Sc; ~
<0 ~ N ('I') ('I') N ('1')('1')
to
to
to
.....<0 W It) N
a::: It) 0) CO 'l:t
=Ii: 0 0 ..... ..... .....
~g U
.- 'l:t en
-0
('Or---
E..... to
S~ ~
<0 ~ ('I') ('I') ('I') ('I') 'l:t 'l:t
I-to
::I: 0::
C)O It) It) 'l:t ('I') N .....
-I-
W~
:3:u.
[:
0 ~
~
('0 :.0
g '0
~ ct)
< ~
0:: ct)
't:' ~
W c:
('I') I- ('0 ~
a: ;:l
..... (I) [:
=Ii: U ~ C'O
(I) Z .~ [:
- $
en 0 CJ
! [:
a; ~ [: .n;
E [: ~
:3: co
:::> en a:: 't:'
...I
~ - CI) [:
c: gg. C'O
CI) [:
E .5 C'O 0
[: .~ EO:: ~
e E!g e
t? 'S; CI)
.... c.
o [: co CI) 0
uw en 0......1 0
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 222 of 236
N
It')
-
't:'
CI)
't:'
[:.
CI)
('t)E .....
<0 E N
8 -
0
CI) .....
0:: .....
- ~ CI)
0)
.[: co
0 0...
.[:
c.
-
en
CI).....
.s::. en
O)CI)
.- ..0
.s::. CI)
CI).s::.
.s::.-
-0)
0)[:
c:.-
W .- CI)
0:: ,8..0
0 It)oqo
u ==
en .~.~ ~
...I It)oqo~
~ o.s",
0 -.....u.
I- .....--
_o.s::.
o CI) .21
(I) - CI)
-B:3:
B en )(
en ".::6:.
" .::6:. [:
6 ~ co
00::0::
If CI) II
..... 0) ~
.s::. e:!
.21 CI) 8
CI)~en
~. :
to to to
I
JIlL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;
~~ W 10 (0
0::: It) (0 (0 "'it
0 .... ..... .....
CD ('I)
>0 0
=0 en
ta~
E..... ..
S~ ~
<0 ~ ('I) ('I) "'it N ('I) "'it
t
..
.....ClO w (0
0::: LO LO (0 (0 "'it
*0 ..... .....
~8 0
(,)
=0 en
ta~
E..... ..
S"'it ~
<8 ~ ('I) ..... "'it N ('I) "'it
1-"
:I: 0:::
(!)o It) 10 "'it ('I) N .....
-I-
wO
~Lt
c:
0 ~
=
ta :c
,9
- '0
<( ~ In
[i: In ~
"0
W c:
"l:t l- ta is
..... 0:: li c:
* 0 ~ ta
S Z ,~ c:
CiS 0 S
~ c:
G3 !;( c: '(6
c: ~
~ <<I
:::> - a. "0
~ CI1
1: CD c:
g.~ ta
CD c:
E 0
c: I~ Eo::: =
e '- 2 e
1i) 'S: ~ E c: 8-
o c: ta CD 0
ow en 0....1 0
......
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.....
I
i
"0
c:
CD
NE
(0 E
8
~
-
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 223 of 236
C\I .....
10 N
'0
C\I
.....
~ CD
0)
"I:: ta
0 a.
'1::
0-
-
In
CD-
..c:U)
.2> .8
..c: CD
CDS
:50)
O)c:
c: .-
W .- CD
CD.Q
0::: .Q"'it
0 LOS
0 S .~
cn .~ '-
~ It)"'it~
o.sa:l
0 -.....u-
I- ::'01:
o CD .2>
CD-CD
-B~
Bcnx
cn".lIC
" .lIC c:
oC:ta
ts~o:::
<<I CD II
U-O)
Eee
.2> CD 8
CD~cn
~ t i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
...
...
...
W
('I')coO:::It)It)COmcoC'll
*80...............
~ou
:c~en
co,....
E.....
~~ ...
~o~
Z('l')('I')"l;t('l')"l;tC'll
~
...
...
...
w
~ COo 0::: 0 0 CO (0 (0 C'II
-00...............
~ou
:;::::I co en
co~
E........
~~~
~oa::C'IIC'II"l;tC'll('l')C'II
...
...
...
W
.....coO:::OOtO(o(oN
*80...............
~oU
:;~en
E~...
s~~
<o~C'IIC'II"l;tC'll('l')C'II
~...
J:O:::
C,!) ~ It) It) "l:t ('I') C'II .....
wU
~Lt
It)
.....
~
CD
-
CiS
Q)
~
<(
0:::
W
~
IX:
U
Z
o
~
::::)
.....
~
c:
~ ~
to :c
g "en
:E U)
U) 8
-g ~
Jg 8
CD c:
~ 2- j
~ .5 c:
~ c: .-
E c: Ctl
co::!:
m 0.."0
oW CD ffi
&i 2-gc:
E c: Ctl 0
c: EO:::;::::I
_ .e ~.~ g: ~
U) :> .::: J:: c: CD
oc:CtlCDoOc.
Uweno.......
-
"0
CD
"0
C
CD
lOE
COE
8
CD
0::
-
o
lO
o
lO
w
0::
o
U
en
~
o
~
~
'1::
o
'C
c.
CiS
CD'U)
"5 CD
.- .Q
.c CD
~:5
-0>
O>c::
c: .-
.- CD
CD.Q
.o"l;t
LO.c
..c:-
~.~ ~
~ "l;t 0
lOOt)
o-Ctl
-.....LL.
.....--
_o.c
o CD .2>
CD-CD
n;~~
uenx
cn..~
.. ~ c::
o c:: co
_Ctl"",
(.)0::1.1-
~ CD II
_ 0> lI)
.cf!';:'
,2> CD 8
CD~en
~... t
... ... ...
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 224 of 236
.....
C'II
-
o
('t)
.....
CD
C)
co
0..
I
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:
.
~c; w U') 0 N
0:: CO CO~
~8 8 ..... ..... .....
:;::l0 en
a:!~
E..... ~
~8 M~
~ M N M N
:
..... ..... w 0 N
0:: U') co N ~
:tt:o 0 """: ..... .....
0
~o (j
:;::ltO en
a:!N
E~ ~
oS~
<(0 ~ M N M N ..... "It
1-.
J:O::
,,0 It) U') ~ M N .....
-I-
w~
3:Ll.
c
0 ~
~
a:! :s
:S: 'in
<( ~ CI)
0:: en 8
w -g <(
co I- a:! 8
0:: =
..... G) c
:tt: (j ~ a:!
.s z c
.~ oS
en 0 ~ c
a:; ~ c 'ct;
E c :::!:
3: a:!
::::> 'a; n: -c
~ - ~ c
C a:!
G) go c
E c
a:! 0
c I~ :e 0:: ~
e .~ g ~
U) 'S; ~
8tD ~ ~ -I 0
"",...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
i
-c
c
M~
10 E
8
~
-
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 225 of 236
C>> .....
-=t N
'0
-=t
.....
~ G)
0)
'1: a:!
0 a...
'1:
Q.
-
en
G)u;
"5<1)
.- .c
.c G)
G):6
:60)
O>c
c .-
W ,- a)
G)..o
0:: .o~
0 10:5
(j :6'~
(J) .~ ~
g "It.9
10 (.)
oS a:!
-.....Ll.
I- :'OE
o a)'~
a)-a)
-B3:
B (J) ><
en..~
i..: '2 c
-acaa:!
0::0::
co a) II
Ll.0)
-ns~
.c....8
.~~
a)<en
3:.. :
.. .. oil
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
to
to
to
~~ W 0 '"
0:: 10 CO <D~
Q)8 0 .... .... ....
~'" ()
as 0) en
E~ to
.s~ ~
<(0 ~ M '" M '" M~
.
:
.....co w '"
0:: 10 10 0) CO ~
~O 0 .... or- .....
Q)O
>0 0
:::sCO en
as 0)
E~ to
.sa~ ~
<Co ~ C"') M (\") M M ~
1-.
J:O::
C)O 10 10 ~ M '" .....
-I-
W~
=:u..
t:
0 ~
:;:l
as :0
g '0
<( ~ CI)
0:: CI) 8
"C ~
W t:
""" I- as 8
..... 0:: :;;
=It Q) t:
() ~ as
.sa z .~ e:
CiS CD
0 -
~ t:
Q) ~ t: 'm
E t: :E
3: as
:::> m ii: "C
...J
~ - 8 t:
t: as
Q) g e:
W E e:
as 0
t: ~ E 0:: :;:l
- .g .~ g. t'!!
CI) > CD
.... C.
o t: as CD 0
ow en a.. ...J 0
(\")
10
-
"C
CD
"C
t:
CD
.....E
<DE
8
CD
0::
-
W
0::
o
()
en
...J
~
o
I-
J:-
'e:
o
"t:
C.
1;;
CD 10
"5, CD
.- .0
.c: CD
~=
-0)
O)t:
t: .-
.- CD
~.o
LO~
55
.-'i L..
3:~.9
lOoo
0- a:l
-.....u..
..... .... -
.....o.c:
o CD .23
CD-CD
-as3:
~ ~ ><
en..~
t.:"2 t:
.Bas as
(.')0::0::
as (1) II
u..C)
-C\J~
.c: L.. 8
.23 CD
CD~en
3: to :
. to to
Agenda Item No.1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 226 of 236
.....
'"
.....
o
10
.....
CD
0)
as
a..
I
..-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'"
:
~o w co
0:: It) 0 CO CO(l')
~8 0 .... .... ....
U
.- 0 CI)
-CO
COco
E.... '"
~8 ~ ~(l')
~ (l') N ~ N
'"
'"
'"
....0) W CO
0:: It) 0 CO CO (l')
=!:to .... .... ...-
0 0
~O U
:=N CI)
co,...
E~ '"
S(!; ~
<0 ~ (l') N ~ N (l') (l')
I-~
::I: 0
(!)1- It) It) ~ ('I") N ....
Uj~
3:u..
c:
0 ~
:=
CO :c
8 '0
c:( :E fI)
0:: fI) ~
"C
W c:
co I- CO 8
.... 0:: :;::l
=!:t CD c:
U ~ CO
~ Z .~ c:
CD
CI) 0 ~ i:
Q) ~ c: 'm
E c: ~
~ CO
:J - a. -g
~ CO
- ~
c: CO
W ~ g c: c:
CO 0
c: I~ = 0:: :;::r
e .~ ~ e?
(;) '> CD
.... Q.
o c: CO ~ .9
uw CI) 0
-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-,
I
Agenda Item No.1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 227 of 236
-
"i
"C
c:
~~
E
8
~
-
(C ....
It) N
'0
co
....
~ a>
0)
'C co
0 a.
'C
Q.
-
fI)
.!1i)
.S? ..8
.c CD
a>=
=0)
O)c:
c: .-
W 'Q) ..8
f5 ..o~
It) =
U :6 ':,:
CI) ':,: ...
g It)~-B
0.9 co
-...-u..
I- "'--E
'000)
a> .-
g)-a>
-B~
B CI) ><
CI)",:s:
L.:,:s: c:
o c co
_1tI0::
(.)0::
1tI a> II
u..0)
Ee?~
.S? a> 8
a>~CI)
3: '" :
'" '" '"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
~~ UJ 0 CO
0:: 0 CO COC\l
0 .... .... ....
~g 0
=~ rn
ctI""
E.... .
.!~ ~
<(0 ~ C'.I C\I ~ C\I t"')C'.I
.
.
....0) w CO
0:: 10 0 CO CO t"')
=It 0 0 .... .... ...
CDO
>0 0
=N CfJ
ctI"
E~ .
.!~ ~
<(0 z C"') C'.I ~ N C"') C"')
~
1-.
J:O::
~o LO 10 ~ C"') C'.I ....
-I-
wo
~~
c:
0 ~
;l
~ :s
;l 'in
<( ~ en
0::: en ~
'0
W c:
0) I- ctI 8
c::: ;:
.... CD c:
=It 0 ~ ctI
.! z .~ c:
CiS 0 oS
~ c:
Q) ~ c: 'to
E c: ::E
~ ctI
::> .s a: "C
...J
~ 8- c:
c: ctI
CD g c:
E c:
ctI 0
c: I.; = 0::: ;l
e '~ go ~
- '- CD
rn > ..... a.
o c: ctI CD .9
ow rn a.. 0
Agenda Item No. 1 DC
May 10, 2005
Page 228 of 236
o
LO
-
'0
CD
'0
c:
CD
co E ....
IOE N
8 .....
0
CD "
0::: ....
- ~ CD
O'l
'C ctI
0 a..
'C
a.
-
en
CD1i.j
'5, CD
.- ..Cl
.c CD
~=
-0)
O'lc
c: ,-
W '- CD
0::: ~..Cl
0 LO~
0 .c=
rn - .~
.~ l-
...J LO~~
~ o .s ctI
~ -....LL
...---
_o.c:
o CD .~
CD-CD
-~~
~tJ)x
rn...lIt;
.. .lit; c:
(scctI
_ctlo:::
(.)0:::
ctI CD II
u.0'l
- ttl l!!
.cl-8
.~ CD
CD<CfJ
~. :
... . .
I
.......
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:
-
~8 w I() I() ('I.j
a:: 0) co'Ot
0 ~ ..... ~
0
~o ()
. CO en
ca~
E('I') ~
S~
<(0 ~ ('I') ('I') ('I') ('I') ('I') "'it
-
:
.....""" w ('I.j
~o a:: I() I() ~ ('I') CO ~
0 0
~o ()
;lCO en
caO
E~ -
S~ -
~
<(0 ~ ..... ~ ('I') ..... ('I') ......
1--
J:O::
c.!)O I() I() 'Ot ('I') ('I.j ~
-I-
w()
~~
c: ~
0
;l
ca :c
.2:
- .~
<C :i ~
a:: (I)
"0
W c:
0 I- ca 8
~ a:: :;::l
(1) c:
() ~ ca
S z .~ c:
s
en 0 ! c:
as ~ c: '-
E c: ca
~ ca~
::::> ~ 0:"0
~ (1) c:
gg. Cll
(1) c:
E i~ 0
c: l'i ;l
e .- g e
'0 'S; - ~ c: 8
o c: as a...9
()W en
""..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
......
I
i
"0
c:
..... ~
co E
~
-
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 229 of 236
~ .....
('I.j
....
0
co
.....
b (1)
0)
'C: co
0 a..
'C:
Co
'0
~ii)
.2" .8
.c: CI)
(1).:;
=0)
C>c:
c: .-
W .- (1)
0:: .8.0
0 I()'l;t
.c:
() .c: =-
en j i r...
~ I()'l;t~
Q.9as
0 -.....LL
I- .....-.....
'Oo.g,
(1) .-
(1) - CI)
-~~
~enx
en..~
i...: ~ c:
.snsns
(.)0::0::
ns CI) II
LLO)
-cae
.c:t.-8
.2" ~
(1)<en
~: t
- -
:
'"
W
C\I 0)0 0::: 10 0 C\I cg cg ~
:;t 0 0 ~....- ~
~OU
:=~CJ)
cu
E ~ '" .
S~~
<O~(t)C\I(t)N(t)~
...
'"
...
W
~(t)o:::lOlOC\lcgCO~
:;tgo~~~
~OU
:=COCl)
<<J(t)
E~...
S~~
<OZ(t)(t)(t)N(t)~
~
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1-'"
:::to:::
C!)O
-I-
W~
:5:u.
.
.
.
~
~
oS
en
G)
3:
.
.
.
.
101O~(t)N~
c::e
a::
W
I-
0:::
U
Z
o
~
::>
..J
~
I:
g ~
51 :c
~ 'Ci)
:i 0
~ ~
~ B
Q) I:
~O ~
gs
~ .- I:
E i ~
S 0:"
I: CDS
Q) g:gl:
E I: cu 0
C =0::::=
e i :>. .- CU
.... .-. 4i E g Q)
~ ~ a; a..Q) 0 00.
UWCI) ..J
(t)
10
i
'C
I:
Q)
O)E
IOE
8
Q)
0:::
-
W
0::
o
U
CJ)
..J
~
o
I-
~
'C
o
'C
0.
....
o
Q)....
.J::0
0) CD
.- .0
.J:: CD
~=
-0)
0)1:
I: .-
.- CD
.8.0
IO~
.J::
J:::-
~iL..
~~.B
LOOO
o .... CU
......-u.
~--
_OJ::
o CD .2'
CD-CD
-B3:
Boo x
CJ)..~
.. .:.::: I:
o I: cu
_cu,.;
00:::1-'0
cu Q) II
u.C)
.... cu ~
.J::L..8
.2' ~
CDc::eCl)
3:... :
'" ... '"
Agenda Item No.1 DC
May 10,2005
Page 230 of 236
..-
N
'0
0)
~
""'
CD
C)
cu
a..
I
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 231 of 236
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'.,
~' ,
".....
APPENDIX B
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
Maps of Alternative Well Sites
....
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
I
CI"..L..v ANI:! HAN..N ~~.
Agenda Item No, 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 232 of 236
II
:a
.
. t
r
.
0(
)
Z
D ."rI''''' ~ I
:t ~@
) ,.~>,~
2 .d\~
. III ~ I I I
.
z I I
~
. i ~II ~ I I .
I
I !
I I
I
I
I
I
I ,"
I
J
[
.
.....""
~'
~II
11.1
"
I ,
"
....
// .- ---:r"' "':::T,"'-\.- '-----
~]~~~~, l'~~' L:/ ~ --"'\, .,..~
'.,~"" '(' ~ """-"''''''''''''''' "".."'-\......"""'"..".......,,,,"'.."'..
;;>1 1/"",,,,
"~"'-.... 1 ../' .........'" ,
.. ~ /1-1... "'-..".~
, "ow.~ /' / ~ ...................~__ It .....~."..
"'--'::~..J .:~__"'-"'--''''\...-.!
__"'___. l",
, ---"'" -"" --:::.
,.. :V., ,/7<
v-~~
ElCISllNQ 170' FPI.
\
\
I
i
!
1
/""'~/'
PUll - LAICE
IIIltJS'IlM. . !WI(
~',]f-'j: '
..".#~
",~:~Ji
,_.."..,..tnlt~._"",,,
/
/
/'
...,,)"'-"'.
.,....-'-..., //
I '-.,,-
\,
1
r-'
MATCH UNE (SEE FIGURE 2)
Iii
Agenda Item No. 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 233 of 236
.
II
.
.
5
)Ii
z
I)
%
>>-
Z
.
.
I
~
"<-"
"
"
'.....'t<,
.,,</ '\.
'\
"
,
"
\....~
,
MATICH LIMe. -
,_ fI'IOUM I)
Ili
Agenda Item No, 10C
May 10, 2005
Page 234 of 236
.
:I
.
.
..
.
0(
~
Z
o
%
.
Z
.
.
Z
;
I
t
I I I
I I I
'i #",,#
'I
111~~1O;:~~~.:_ --,..,. ..-
[ Ii f-----:~---- i
11111
I
~ ',I r
JI,
II I
Ii l
~,....
~ --,-_...~-~.,_._.....~ .,
"..,/
~
I'
I t
"',/
.,;"""
,it
/'
0'
I
"'../"
lQ) - .... ~ oml
._~_".".__,........,.,,~u~ _...._...._.._._ .-
_.._..'m_...'....,.."'~..._....._.._,_....
..../
. ..~..,.._...._......_....u_...,
....-...-....-..--.-..-..-.-
"..
",'"
__#.._.__" .... _u ___
WI!1J.. stt':'.,.
r-
I
~....'....,.,...,...- )
-.L. NO.17 -.-.._.. . /
~ 1 ....,'
~
,.,--
MATCH LINE (SEE FlGURI! 4'
Ii
.......,,'_.......,-,.;~.;..-;:..,;.;.;..~
"
':1Ip;.,..-.
.__M__....__ ~_"'__^ "--~. ,- ...,~..~~ ~
Agenda Item No. 1 OC
May 10, 2005
Page 235 of 236
.
>>
:.
.
r
~
)I
z
a
z
)
z
.
.
z.
.~
/'
/'
: /t
M 1-- -:~~= _
k:,::='=C:;';""
,;I'
,.. IIlIlt ...
. tNt' l"
.'W .... ......... ! I
--''''''.'''-----'-'''''''-'''-''-.'1 'I
I
I
,,......"'...t
",/
.#",.
....~ID
...,-,.-..-........--
..,...'''''''
1
.
...,'"
,
II
I'
F''''l
!~~
I I I
II ·
II -
I
.......'....... ...--..
Ii
"."__".r._ T
u
o
.....
""" ..
.... ''It
N a
en l<:...,,,,,..,,,..... 4' I-~ !:C_,'" ",'_. It_"'~.._.... ..-...- .."'-,.,'"
~ (000 M
..
MO ....
N.... ClC) a
Q -
~ o . Q ~ ~ .r.: ~
(00 N .... ::: ~ S
~ ~Z a t::l
.,:-. :::::
lll.... ..... III ~
'.. l:
gu .. ~
....
a..~ a :::c ~ .~
- r... ~
.~ ~ t::l III
0 ~ ::. e
.... ~
... a III ~
a.. ..-..- ~ ""
"''''_>>'_'f,' ._".: ~,-~,-..- "'......,.,,"'- ......,-;""... t-- - t::l
M III III
- .. ~ ~ ~
....
ca ~ a ~ ~
Q II:
.... Q ~ III
.- ~ 'r:; ',:: CI:::
C. N
.... .:! u ~
ca ~ a ~ ::::
0 0 ~- ~ ~
> ..... III ~
r.r.. .. I
.... ::: ~ e3
a :: u
1--- ~ III ~
''It ~
..
.... ::: r... .....
a .! ~ II:
,....._""',.. -........, .........,......" ""....... . . ,.:- . . "".""..., ,.."..._,,,,,,,, !-- t-- oS ~
c:! t::l ..':1 Q., ~
.... ::: ::: .....
CD a e e ... ~
Q ...
- e--- - - {l III .,.,
Q N III ~ ~ -
N .. ::: ~ ~ -
.... a t::l W
a III ltU
- - -f- "" ~ ~
..... ~ ~ III -
-
.. '"' r... III
.... ~ ~
a ::: '"' I-
- - -I- ~ t::l ,t::l III
.... ~ :t:
~ .1:: ~ -
.~ ::: - CC
.... t::l .....
a ::: ..':1- ~ ~
1-. . . .. - - -a" .. it:
.. ~ . .- - .- ""lIIt ",--.-: """" .~ -
C M t::l it: ~ ..... I
.. III ""
.2 an .... 1Il E ~
a os Q:: u ><
Q III
'" Q ~ ~ .,:-. t::l
N .....
C N .. III ::: t::l W
II) .... - . .... :::c
ca a N II: ...;-
0 .... ~ a
c. r... ~
> ~ ....
>< ..... 't
r.r.. .. .::: 'S QQ
W .... ..... ::: ~
a ::: ~ ::::
t::l ~
"C "" r...
~ II: ::: III
- ~ ~ III 'S
CD .... ',:: '"' .:::
!E a t- .:!: t. ..... II:
"',", ,t>.. ->,..., ....-... ---~. -, .","'" ......-....,-.., """",."",. f- r... ::::
a; M ~ t::l ~ ~
.. ~ r... .....
....
3: ''It a CI::: ~ ~ U
Q t::l ~ III
.a .~
Q ~
C N N ..... ~
.. ::::: Q,;
.... ~ -
C) a III
'l:::I ..':1 :: g
:i t::l it: ~
..... III
.. ~ e II: ~
. .... t::l
0 a :::: III
~ "" I
N .~ ... ~
III .::: l"l
Q. .. III oS III t::l ~
Q Q .... u E
~ Q III Q Q C") :::: II: II:
.... Q .... Q Q III r...
Ul 0 C") 0 Q iii E ~ ~ .;:
0 Q iii 0 .... .. ""
III 4It Q Ql E ~ t::l
c:: (.) Q Ul Q Q M :: II:
M "" 0 .... ~ II: t::l
0 4It 4It N '"' .... S: ~
4It N 4It 1Il t::l
en Q:: E t::l
r...
. . g
CI) c l!!
E 0 .- ~ 1'1
~ C ..
ca 0 E c - !II
I- :! I "' i:i 0
Z z ~ I. 0 ..., U
~ :I G1 t c 0 l!! c
.... a" G1 A- 0 t- 's 0
+:l
U W u II) ...... :I ~ ..., cr U"CI
< :::>> u QI
CI) C I. U a:: .5S
. ..... en ..., G1 G1
~ ~ ~ 'iij II) ~ .... C III 1'1
C C C II) 0 0 C E
G1 0 +:l 0.-
a.. "' "' C I. U o.
-I -I Q y .... A- ce .. QI
c:i
z
E
41
ell
'0
c:
III
C)
<C
5
1 0 0 5
~\Oc..
Memorandum
TO: Patricia Morgan, Supervisor
Clerk of Courts, Minutes & Records
FRO~~: r.. IR?0.)A?tt, Manager, Property Acquisition & Sales
~'al estate Services
DATE: May 10, 2005
RE: South County Regional Water Treatment Plant RO Wellfield Expansion Project
(SCRWTP)
Staff is processing the SCRWTP Condemnation Resolution for presentation to the Board
of County Commissioners on May 10, 2005, Agenda Item 10C.
Please find attached two technical memoranda which are not included in the printed
agenda packet, but which are available for public review in the Board Office.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at extension 8780.
Thank you.
Attachments as stated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5
1 0
it l Dc..
5
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Wellfield Design and Permitting for South County Regional Water
Treatment Plant Reverse Osmosis Expansion to 20MGD
Well Site Investigation
Technical Memorandum
GRIiIiLEiY ANC HANSIiIN LLC
November 2003
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
CilRIi.LliV ANa ....AN..N ~~..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r:
1 0
~ \0<:"
5
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERN:MENT
Wellfield Design and Pennitting for South County Regional Water Treatment Plant
Reverse Osmosis Expansion to 20MGD
Well Site Investigation
Technical Memorandum
GRI!BLI!IV AND HANSEN LLC
November 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Title
Page
1. INTRODUCTION.. .... ..... ......... ............ ............. ........ ................... ............ .........., ..... .... .......... ......... .......... 1
1.1 Background and Purpose .................,...........................................................................................1
1.2 Scope of Investigations................................................................................., ...............................1
1.3 Well Site Selection Methodology.................................................................................................1
2. Justification for Well Site Sdection.........,..............................................,.....................,............................2
2.1 Introduction.....,......... ,.......... ............. .........,.. .......... .............. ...,............ ........, ................................ 2
2.2 Well Site Area.. ,.. ,..........., ......... ..........,................... ........................................, .................,............. 2
2.3 Site Selection Criteria ........... '........ ,.................... ,........... ,........... ......., ........................................... 2
2.3.1 Cost............, .......... .... ..............., .......... ............ ........... .................... ..................... ..... .............. ..........3
2.3.2 Environmental Impact/Wetlands Mitigation............... .......... .......... .......... ....................... ........ 3
2.3.3 Safety ............................... .......... .......... .................... ............ ........ ......... ............ .....,... ......... ............. 3
2.3.4 Pennitting ...... .... .... ..... .......... .... ...... ......... ..... ....... .... ........ .... .... .... ....... ............ ....... .... ......... ...... ......3
2.3.5 Long Range Planning ....................................................................................................................3
2.3.6 Operation and Maintenance Accessibility .................................................................................3
3. Alternative Well Site Locations....................................., ..., .......,..........., .................... .......... ...................... 3
3.1 General...,.............. .......... .... ........... ......................... ......... ......... .................. ........ ....... ......... ............ 3
3.2 Decision Matrix Form .................................................................................................................. 7
3.3 Rating the Well Sites Against Criteria......................................................................................... 7
4. RECO~NDED WElL SITES.......................................................................................................... 7
APPENDICES
A. Well Site Rankings (Site Sdection Matrix Results)
B. Maps of Alternative Well Sites
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
G1R..L.V ANC HAN..N .."
r------- -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 0
~~ot.
5
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERN1vffiNT
Wellfield Design and Permitting for South County Regional Water Treatment
Plant Reverse Osmosis Expansion to 20MGD
Well Site Investigation
Technical Memorandum
GREEL&Y AND HANS&N L.L.C
November 2003
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BacIq,ound and Pm:pose
The purpose of this memorandum is to identify possible locations for proposed well
sites required for the South County Regional Water Treatment Plant (SCRWTP) Well Field
Expansion project, to document the methods used to select these sites, and to provide final
recommendations for the locations of the well sites. These wells will be utilized to provide raw
water for the SCRwrP reverse osmosis expansion to 20 million gallons per day (MGD). The
raw water requirements for the plant expansion include 16 MGD for treatment to provide an
additional 12 MGD of finished water plus an additional 20 percent to meet the County's
reliability requirements. Each well will be designed to provide 700 gallons per minute (1 MGD)
of water. Therefore, the minimwn required nwnber of wells for the 12 MGD SCRWTP
expansion is 20 wells. Twenty-three well sites have been investigated in this study.
1.2 Scope of Investigations
Gredey and Hansen LLC is the consultant charged with the completion of the well site
investigation. Water Resource Solutions (WRS) is advising on the apparent suitability of the well
sites from a water production and water use permitting purview. The investigations presented
herein comprise the following principle elements:
· Acquire and develop basic information needed for the well site selection
process;
· Develop alternative well locations;
· Evaluate and compare the alternatives;
· Devdop recommended well locations based on the results of these
investigations.
1.3 Well Site Selection Methodology
The methodology employed to identify the recommended locations for the well sites
consists of the following major elements:
· Focus on areas that are hydrogeological1y and environmentally advantageous;
· Identify 23 potential well sites and alternatives for each one;
. Select engineering, regulatory, long range planning, safety and other non-cost
criteria against which all potential well sites are evaluated and compared;
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
G1"'..L&V AND HAN..N ~.c
I
1 -)
\~
:# \ Ot-
"
'.1
I
I
· Evaluate the permitability and constructability of the alternative locations in the
field;
. Weigh the selected criteria for this project;
· Develop and compare cost estimates for the sites; and
· Identify the recommended well sites. considering all of the above.
I
The recommended locations for the well sites will be determined by taking all of the
selection criteria into account and may not oecessarily be the least expensive in situations where
environmental protection. safety or other considerations override cost.
I
2 JUSTIFICATION FOR WELL SITE SELECTION
I
2.1
Introduction
I
Greeley and Hansen LLC identified 23 potential well locations with alternatives. All of
the potential locations were evaluated based on six criteria: Cost, Environmental
Impacts/Wetlands Mitigation, Safety, Permitting, Long Range Planning and Operation and
Maintenance Accessibility. Following the evaluations, all of the potential locations and their
alternatives were compared against one another using a site selection matrix form (Appendix A),
which will be discussed in detail later in this memorandum.
I
I
2.2
Well Site Area
I
Each well site will require a minimum 40-foot by 50-foot permanent easement and will
be surrounded by a chain-link fence. Equipment for each well site consists of a well pump,
standpipe, electrical panel, and necessary fittings connecting the well to the transmission main.
Five of the twenty-three well sites are required to have back-up generators in the event of a
power failure, and will need a 4O-foot by 60-foot easement.
I
I
I
Based on studies by WRS, the well sites should be located at least one-thousand feet
apart. The ideal well site location would be as close to the transmission main as possible, in a
location that is easily accessible, and in a location that is safe. The ideal location would also be in
an up-land area, unoccupied by native species, and partially cleared to minimize environmental
impact associated with developing the site. Finally, an ideal well site would be compatible with
planned future development. Florida Power and Light (FP&L) has conceptually approved the
buried transmission main to be located within their easement, however due to the proposed
above ground appurtenances and use of the well sites and their possible proximity (<100 feet) to
existing and proposed FP&L utilities, well sites were not able to be located within the FP&L
easement. It is also recommended by the South Florida Management Water District (SFWMD)
not to locate well sites in areas designated as Environmental Conservation Easements (CEs).
I
I
2.3 Site Selection Criteria
I
The 23 potential well sites and their alternatives were evaluated using evaluation criteria
and a decision matrix. These criteria can be described as the most relevant issues with regard to
justifying the chosen locations of the well sites. Similar criteria were used in the route selection
for the transmission main. The site selection criteria are briefly described as follows:
I
I
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
I
13R..L.V AND HAN..N LLC
I
I
I
I
I
1 "",
r:::
.:rt: \ ex:..
2.3.1 ~
Cost/benefit analysis of the proposed site location is an important criteria. Estimates of
costs associated with land acquisition for the well sites, development of the sites, construction of
supply lines between the wells and the transmission main, and construction access to the sites
were considered. For example, well sites located further from the transmission main typically
have higher associated construction costs, and will also require additional pumping costs to
maintain system hydraulics.
2.3.2 Environmental Impact/Wetlands Mitigation
I
Properties with wetlands and native vegetation species may require additional pennitting
efforts and additional site development for mitigation. Not only does this contribute to the
destruction of native wildlife habitat and natural wetlands, but these factors also contribute to
increased costs.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.3.3 ~
Public and worker safety are always a primary consideration in any project regardless of
the site location.
2.3.4 Permitting
Pennitting requirements for each well site may increase cost and delay construction due
to agency review time and comment periods, public notification, and public hearings.
2.3.5 Long Range Planning
Long range planning and development is a significant consideration for selecting well
sites. Properties where planned future development is unlikely or impractical are preferred to
ensure the well sites will remain isolated and undisturbed.
2.3.6 Operation and Maintenance Accessibility
The well sites require monthly inspection and periodic maintenance to ensure proper
operation. This is especially important for those well sites equipped with emergency generators.
3 ALTERNATIVE WELL SITE LOCATIONS
3.1 General
As previously mentioned, 23 potential well sites and their alternatives were identified
and evaluated based on field observations and review of collected data. The following list
identifies all of the proposed well site locations, which are located on the Well Site Location
Maps in Appendix B:
Well Site Number 1:
· Located approximately 350 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL Easement and
175 feet South of Beck Boulevard within the SFWMD right-of-way. No alternative sites
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
GlA.....y AND HAN..N ~LC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.:tf lO c:
for this well are required since this is an existing well in the SFWMD right-of-way.
(Figure 1)
Well Site Number 2:
. Located approximately 925 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL Easement
and 200 feet South of Beck Boulevard within the SFWMD right-of-way. Noalternative
sites were developed for well site number 2 since this well site is within the SF\VMD
right-of-way and will not require an easement. (Figure 1)
Well Site Number 3:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 1,050 feet West of the western boundary of the
FPL Easement and 125 feet East of County Road 951 within the SFWlMD right-of-way.
(Figure 2)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 950 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement within the Northwest corner of Folio Number 00410680007. (Figure 2)
· Alternative 3: Located on eastern boundary of the FPL Easement approximately 325
feet South of Forest Glen Boulevard within Folio Number 32720000387. (Figure 2)
Well Site Number 4:
· Alternative 1: Located on eastern boundary of the FPL Easement approximately 195
feet South of Northwest comer of Folio Number 00410840009. (Figure 2)
· Alternative 2: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 00410680007. (Figure 2)
Well Site Number 5:
· Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along South edge of
Folio Number 00410680007. (Figure 2)
· Alternative 2: Located on eastern boundary of the FPL Easement approximately 100
feet South of Northwest corner of Folio Number 00410640005. (Figure 2)
Well Site Number 6:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 75 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL
Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00411640005. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 75 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL
Easement along North Edge of Folio Number 00411800006. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 3: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 00410760008. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 7:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 1,250 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00411800006. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00411640005. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 8:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 2,500 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00411800006. (Figure 3)
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
QR..L..V ANa HAN..N ~u:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 n h
:# to<:...
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 2,500 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00411640005. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 9:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 925 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement along the Northwest comer of Folio Number 00411520001. (FigUre 3)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 925 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement along the Southwest corner of Folio Number 00411800006. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 10:
· Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 00411000000. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along South edge of
Folio Number 00411520001. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 11:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 120 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL
Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417200008. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 120 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL
Easement along the South Edge 0 f Folio Number 00411800006. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 12:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 1,100 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417200008. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 1,100 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00411800006. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 3: Located approximately 1,290 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417320001. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 13:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 2,500 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417040006. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 2,450 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417680000. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 14:
· Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along South edge of
Folio Number 00418400302. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located on eastern boundary of the FPL Easement along South edge of
Folio Number 00417200008. (Figure 3)
Well Site Number 15:
· Alternative 1: Located approximately 2,490 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417600006. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 2: Located approximately 2,450 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00417480006. (Figure 3)
· Alternative 3: Located approximately 2,490 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00417040006. (Figure 3)
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
CilR88L.V AND HAN..N LLC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r:
'-
1 0
::tt lO e.....
5
Well Site Number 16:
. Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement approximately 60
feet South of the North edge of Folio Number 00418280001. (Figure 4)
. Alternative 2: Located approximately 100 feet East of the eastern boundary of the FPL
Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00418400001. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 17:
. Alternative 1: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00416960006. (Figure 4)
. Alternative 2: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00416920004. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 18:
. Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 00417720009. (Figure 4)
. Alternative 2: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along South edge of
Folio Number 00416800001. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 19:
. Alternative 1: Located approximately 940 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement along the Southwest comer of Folio Number 00417720009. (Figure 4)
. Alternative 2: Located approximately 940 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement along the Northwest corner of Folio Number 00417400002. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 20:
. Alternative 1: Located approximately 2,390 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00434080007. (Figure 4)
. Alternative 2: Located approximately 940 feet West of the western boundary of the FPL
Easement along the Northwest corner of Folio Number 00433360003. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 21:
. Alternative 1: Located on western boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 00433360003. (Figure 4)
. Alternative 2: Located on eastern boundary of the FPL Easement along North edge of
Folio Number 00434160008. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 22:
. Alternative 1: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00434120006. (Figure 4)
. Alternative 2: Located approximately 1.100 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00434160008. (Figure 4)
Well Site Number 23:
. Alternative 1: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the South Edge of Folio Number 00416960006. (Figure 4)
. Alternative 2: Located approximately 1,050 feet West of the western boundary of the
FPL Easement along C.R. 951 within the SFWMD right-of-way. (Figure 4)
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
caA1I8a..8V AND HAN88N "La
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5 1 0 (] 5
4\OL
· Alternative 3: Located approximately 1,200 feet East of the eastern boundary of the
FPL Easement along the North Edge of Folio Number 00417000004. (Figure 4)
The above alternatives for each well site were compared to one another in order to
detennine which site would be best suited for the project according to the site selection criteria
described in Section 2.3.
3.2 Decision Matrix Form
The decision matrix form is a comparative method. which provides a systematic
approach to identifying the most appropriate location of the proposed sites discussed in Section
2. This was accomplished by combining known information about the proposed well sites and
mnking the sites based on the site selection criteria and the site's relative importance to the
overall success of the project. The results of the site selection criteria weighlings are shown in
the evaluation matrix (Appendix A).
3.3 Rating the Well Sites Against Criteria
All 23 potential well sites and their alternatives were compared. Each well site was rated
against all six site selection criteria on a scale of 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent). The resulting products
(criteria weight X mting) were summed to obtain a total score for each potential well site. The
potential well site with the highest total score represents the recommended well site based on the
identified criteria.
4 RECOMMENDED WELL SITES
The following well sites are recommended for (he SCRWTP Wellfield expansion based
on the six evaluation criteria as outlined and described in Section 2.3. Examples of the selection
criteria weighting matrix and the well site rank evaluation are located in Appeadix A.
Well Site Alternative Folio Number Rank/ Out Of
Number
1 SF\'VMD R.O.W. 00415840004 N/A
2 SF\'VMD R.O.W. 00415840004 N/A
3 3 32720000222 67/80
4 1 00410840009 62/80
5 2 00410640005 57/80
6 2 00411800006 68/80
7 1 00411800006 58/80
8 1 00411800006 58/80
9 2 00411800006 63/80
10 1 00411520001 56/80
11 2 00411800006 71/80
12 2 00411800006 63/80
13 1 00417040006 63/80
14 2 00418400302 62/80
15 3 00417040006 65/80
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
CilR..L.V ANa HAN..N ~~c
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'* tOC-
Well Site Alternative Folio Number Rank/ Out Of
Number .
16 2 00418400001 53/80
17 1 00416960006 61/80
18 2 00416800001 58/80
19 1 00417720009 56/80
20 2 00433360003 61/80
21 1 00433360003 58/80
22 2 00434160008 53/80
23 2(SFWMD 00415840004 71/80
R.O.W.)
The folio numbers in the table above and their corresponding descriptions from Section
3.1 represent the recommended well sites for the SCWRTP Reverse Osmosis Wellfield
Expansion to 20 MGD.
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
G1F1Ii.l...V AND HANS.N "L"
r---
I
:1
II
I
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 0 ;] 5
:ft\oC-
APPENDIX A
Well Site Rankings
(Site Selection Matrix Results)
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
G1101I1I1LIIV AND HANBIIN ~LC
I
I
I
I
I
I
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
.. ,
..
('t')C'\I W
0:: It) It) co 0) <Xl.q
=l:t:C'\I ..... ..... .....
CIJC'\I 0
>0 ()
.- 0 U)
.....0
roo
EC'\I
C1J1'-
~C'\I ..
<(('t') ..
~
z ('t') C") .q C") .q-q-
~
..
..
..
C'\II'- W
0:: 0 L() C'\I CO CO ('t')
=l:t:0 0 ..... .... .....
CIJo
>0 ()
.- <Xl U)
.....co
roo
E..... ..
C1J.q ..
~o ~
<(0 Z C'\I ('t') C") C'\I C") C")
~
0::
..
..
..
......q w C'\I
0:: It) 0 CO CO .q
=l:t:0 .... C'\I .....
CIJo 0
>0 ()
:;:d!; U)
~It)
I.- .... ..
C1J-q- ..
~o ~
<(0 Z C") .q C'\I .q ('t') -q-
~
I- ..
:CO::
~O L() It) -q- C") C'\I .....
-I-
UJO
3:~
e
.2 ~
ro :0
.2:
;:: '(i)
~ ~ V)
CIJ
V) (.)
0:: -c (.)
UJ e <(
!::: ro CIJ
C") 0:: ;:; (.)
=I:t: CIJ e
~ 0 ~ ro
Z e
U5 .~ CIJ
0 (.) .....
g e
Q3 ~ e 'n;
3: E e ~
ro
:::> ro a: "'C
-l
<( - ~ e
e ro
> CIJ g e
UJ E e
ro 0
e ~ E 0:::: :;:
0 'E g ro
...... .:: l.-
V) > .$ I.- CIJ
o e ro Q) 0 a.
OUJ (/) a.. -l a
1 n,
',~)
:t loc....
5
-
"'C
Q)
"'C
e
Q)
I'- E
co E
8
CIJ
0::
---
C'\I
L()
It)
co
.....
C'\I
.....
o
.....
UJ
0::
o
o
(/)
-l
<(
I-
a
I-
~
'C
o
'C
a.
en
~en
.!2> 15
.c Q)
Q).c
.c.....
.....Ol
Ole
.S: 'Q)
Q).o
.o-q-
It).c
.c :=:
:=: :: I.-
:: -q- 0
It) t)
o .9 ro
-.....ll.
::'01:
o CIJ .!2>
Q) - CIJ
-ro>
ca(.)>
(.) (/) x
U)".::t:,
L: ~ e
o ca ro
00::0::
~ Q) II
_ Ol CIJ
.c ca I.-
.!2> Q) 8
Q)~(/)
~ iI :
.. .. ..
CIJ
Cl
ca
a..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
..
..
C\lf'-- W
ex: L{) 0 <0 <0 <0 ~
:f:t:O 0 ...- ...- ...-
(1)0
>0 0
.- co (j)
-<0
~o
.... ...- ..
(1)-.::t ..
::0 :::c:=
<(0 z ("I") C\I -.::t N t"':l -.::t
~
..
..
..
...-Q) W
:f:t:O ex: L{) L{) CO Q) -.::t ("I")
(1)0 0 ...- ..- ...-
>0 0
.- -.::t (j)
-a:;l
~O
.... ...- ..
(1)-.::t ..
::0 :::c:=
<(0 Z ("I") ("I") -.::t ("I") N ("I")
~
1-"
:CO::
(90 L{) L{) -.::t ("I") C\I ...-
-I-
wO
~it
e:
0 ~
:.;
CO :0
.Ql
..... '(ii
~ In
<( (1)
ex: In (J
"0 (J
W e: <(
!::: CO (1)
~ ex: ;:; (J
(1) e:
(1) 0 ~ CO
- Z ~ e:
i:i5 (1)
0 (J .....
~ e:
Q5 f= e: 'iij
~ <( E e: ::E
:::) CO
...J CO 0.. "0
<( - ~ e:
e: CO
> (1) g e:
W E e:
CO 0
e: ~ E ex: :.;
0 .~ CO
..... .... g ....
.s (1)
In - a.
0 e: CO (1) 0
() w (j) 0.. ...J 0
1 0 5
=* \CC-
f'--
L{)
-
"0
(1)
"0
e:
(1)
N E
CO E
o
u
(1)
0::
---
...-
N
-
o
N
Q)
01
CO
a.
z-
.;::
o
.;::
a.
w
ex:
o
()
(f')
...J
<(
I-
o
I-
.....
In
~(;)
.2>~
..c: (1)
Q)..c:
..c: -
-0)
Ole:
,5 '03
(1).0
.o-.::t
Lt)..c:
..c: :'.:::
:'.::: == ....
==-.::tB
Lt) 0 (J
o ..... CO
-...-u..
:o:E
o (1) .2>
~n;~
CO(J:>
(J (f') x
(f')..~
"~e:
a e: co
_coo::
~ex:
u.. (1) II
_ 0) (1)
..c: co ....
.2> Q; 8
Q)~(j)
~.. :
.. .. ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
..
..
NLO W
C!: Lt'.l 0 CO (j) ~('I')
:;to ...... ...... ......
Q)O 0
>0 U
.- ~ (/)
.....C,O
~O
'- ...... ..
Q)~ ..
=:0 ::..::::
<(0 Z ('I') N ~ C") N C")
~
..
..
..
...... ....... w
0:: Lt) 0 C,O C,O c.o ('I')
:;to 0 ...... ...... ......
Q)O
>0 U
.- ex) (/)
.....C,O
~O
'- ...... ..
Q)~ ..
==0 ::..::::
<(0 Z ('I') N ~ N C") ('I')
<(
0::
I- "
:cC!:
(90 Lt'.l Lt) ~ ('I') N ......
-I-
UlU
~~
e:
0 ~
:;::;
C'Cl 15
.~
- "(ii
~ en
<( Q)
en u
0:: '"C U
Ul e: <(
!:: C'Cl Q)
LO 0:: :;::; u
=t:t: Q) e:
Q) U ~ C'Cl
:!: Z .~ e:
Q)
en 0 u -
~ e:
Q) ~ e: '(ii
~ E e: ::
::> - C'Cl
-' ro a.. '"C
~ - ~ e:
e: C'Cl
Q) g c
w E e:
C'Cl 0
e: ~ - 0:: :;::;
0 - C'Cl
~ .~ 'E ~ '-
en > - '- Q)
o e: C'Cl Q) 0 a.
UW (/) a.. -' 0
,)
1 0) 5
:tf.toc..
-
"0
Q)
"0
e:
Q)
l"- E
Lt) E
8
Q)
0::
---
C,O
Lt'.l ......
N
-
0
('I')
~ Q)
Ol
'C C'Cl
0 a..
'C
a.
-
en
Q)-
.r:. en
OlQ)
.- .0
.r:. CD
CD.r:.
.r:. -
-Ol
Ole:
e: .-
W .- CD
CD.o
0:: .ov
0 Lt).r:.
U .r:.:!:
en :!:: ::: '-
-' :::~.9
<( LO 0 u
I- 0..... C'Cl
0 -......LL
I- ...... --
_ o.r:.
o CD .Q>
Q) - Q)
-ctl~
C'Cl U
U en x
(/)..~
-..: "2 e:
.9 ctl C'Cl
uC!:o::
~ CD II
_ Ol Q)
.r:. ctl '-
0)'-0
._ CD u
Q)~en
~<< :
.. .. ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
..
..
C"?CO w
0:: Lt) Lt) to C") CON
~o ,.... ,....
Q.)O 0
>0 0
.- to CJ')
-I"-
tOo
E.....
Q.)",,"
:::::0 ..
<(0 ..
~
Z C") ,.... """ ,.... """ N
C2
..
..
..
NtO W
0:: 0 Lt) to to CO C")
~o N ,.... ,....
Q.)O 0
>0 0
.- 0 CJ')
"ice
E::: ..
Q.)'<:t ..
:::::0 ~
<(0 Z '<:t C") '<:t N """ C")
~
..
..
..
,....L.C':) w
0:: 0 Lt) to C"? to N
~O ,.... ,....
Q.)O 0
>0 0
.- '<:t CJ')
rote
C.....
.... ..... ..
Q.)'<:t ..
:::::0 ~
<(0 Z N ,.... '<:t ,.... C") N
~
t-"
:cO::
(90 I.C') Lt) '<:t C") N ,....
_t-
wO
~~
c
0 ~
:;:.
to :0
.Q.
::: 'Ci)
:::E II)
<( Q.)
0:: II) 0
'"C ~
ill c
t- to Q.)
to 0:: :;::; 0
..~ Q.) C
Q.) 0 ~ to
- Z ,~ c
en Q.)
0 0 -
~ C
Q) ~ C '(ij
~ E c :::E
:) to
....J .9 i:L '"C
~ ~ C
C to
Q,) g c
E c
to 0
C ~ E 0::: :;:.
e 'E g to
....
enl;> Q.)
- .... 0.
o C to Q) 0
OW CJ') a.. ....J 0
1 0
=t lOe..
" 5
\.J
Q)
'<:t
-
"'C
Q,)
"'C
C
Q,)
co E
tOE
8
Q,)
0:::
-
N
'<:t
....
N
>0-
o
'<:t
Q,)
0)
to
a..
>>
-
'C
o
'C
0.
L1J
0::
o
()
CJ')
....J
<(
I-
o
t-
-
II)
~t;)
.2'~
..c: Q,)
Q,)..c:
,L:-
- 0)
Ole::
.5 '(j)
Q,).o
.0",,"
Lt)..c:
..c: :::
::: 3: ....
3:",,".9
Lt) 0 0
o - to
-,....LL
::'01:
o Q,) .2'
Q,) - Q.)
cti~5:
o CJ') X
CJ)".lI::
L: -E c
.9 to to
00:::0::
~ Q,) II
_ Ol Q.)
..c: to ....
.2' Q) 8
Q.)~CJ')
~ it :
.. .. ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
Nit) W
c:: 0 It) CO C"':l CON
;t:O ..... .....
(])O 0
>0 0
.- ~ 00
-CO
~O
.... ..... .
(])~ .
:::::0 ~
<(0 Z C\I ..... ~ ..... C"':lN
~
.
.
.
.....CO W
c:: L() 0 CO CO GO C"':l
;t:0 0 ..... ..... .....
(])O
>0 0
.- 0 00
<aGO
c.....
.... ..... .
(])~ .
:::::0 ~
<(0 z C"':l N ~ N ~ C"':l
~
1-.
:r:e::
(90 It) L() ~ C"':l C'\l .....
-I-
wO
~~
c
0 ~
-=
CO :0
.2:
:::: 'en
~ rJl
<( (])
rJl c,)
e:: "0 c,)
W c <(
!:: CO (])
,.... c::: :: c,)
;t: (]) C
(]) 0 ~ CO
- Z .~ c
(j) (])
0 c,) -
~ C
Q) ~ C 'CO
~ E c ~
CO
::> "(ij a. "0
-J
~ - ~ C
C CO
(]) g C
W E c
CO 0
c E c:: -=
.gl-$' .~ ~ CO
- ....
rJl >- (])
0 C CO (]) 0 c.
0 WOO a. -J 0
105
4 \0(,
C'\l
~
-
"0
(])
"0
C
(])
GO E
It) E
8
(])
c:::
-
.....
C'\l
-
o
It)
(])
en
co
a.
C
.;::
o
'C
c.
W
c:::
o
o
00
-J
<(
I-
o
I-
-
rJl
a>-
.ell)
en a>
'- .0
.e a>
(]).e
.e -
-0)
enc:
c: .-
.- a>
(]).o
.o~
It).e
.e::::
:::: ;: L-
;:~.9
It)oc')
o .... co
-.....u..
.....- -
_o.c:
o a> .2>
a>-a>
-co>
COc,)>
c,)U)x
00...,:.:::
i..: "2 c:
o co co
oc::C:::
1f a> II
_O>a>
.e co L-
0)....0
.- a> c,)
a>~CI)
~. :
. .. ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
io
io
io
C'll'- W (0
c::: 0 It') ('I') (oC\l
:;:to ...- ...-
0)0 0
>0 ()
.- C\l cn
(;i('l')
e:"'-
.... ...- io
Q)~ io
-0 ~
4:0 z C\l ...- ~ ...- ('I')C\l
~
io
io
io
...- (0 W (0
c::: It') 0 (0 co ('I')
:;:to ...- ...- ...-
C1)0 0
>0 ()
.- 0 cn
(;ico
E;: ..
C1)~ ..
=0 ~
<(0 Z ('I') C\l ~ C\l -.;t ('I')
~
t-"
J:e:::
(90 It') It') -.;t ('I') C\l ...-
_t-
wU
~~
e:
0 >-
~ ~
C13 :0
"~
== '(i5
~ en
<( C1)
c::: en u
"C U
W e: <(
t- C13 C1)
~ e::: :;:: u
C1) e:
C1) U ~ C13
- Z .~ e:
en C1)
0 U -
~ e:
C1) ~ e: .-
E e: C13
~ C13~
::::> Cii Q.."C
...J
<( - ~ e:
e: C13
> C1) g e:
W E e:
C13 0
e: ;>E e::: :;::;
- .g C13
- E go ....
en > ~ .... C1)
o e: C13 C1) 0 Cl..
UW cnQ.. ...J 0
C\l
-.;t
-
"C
C1)
"C
e:
C1)
co E
It') E
o
u
C1)
e:::
-
ill
c:::
o
()
cn
...J
<(
t-
O
t-
105
4\~
~
'i::
o
"i::
Cl..
...-
C\l
.....
o
(0
C1)
0)
C13
Q..
-
en
Q)-
.c (/)
0lC1)
.- .0
.c Q)
Q).c.
.c. -
-0)
Ole:
e: "-
.- Q)
C1).o
.o~
It').c.
.c. ==
== := ....
:=~.9
It') 0 U
0- C13
-...-u-
...-.....-
.....o.c.
o Q) .2>
C1) - C1)
-C13>
C13U>
Ucnx
cn ". .::t:.
"~e:
o e: C13
_co,..,.
uc:::u..
~ Q) II
_ 0) <1l
.c. C13 ....
0)....0
.- C1) U
<1l~cn
~ -Ie :
.. .. ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'"
'"
'"
Nc.o W N
0:: I() L() 0') O:)"<t
=t:t:0 0 ..... ..... .....
Q)O
>0 U
.- 0 CJ)
-0:)
~.....
L.. ..... '"
Q)-.:t '"
'=:0 ~
<t::0 Z ("I') ("I') ("I') ("I') "<t"<t
~
'"
'"
'"
w
.......... 0:: 0 L.() N c.o c.o "<t
=t:t:0 0 ..... ..... .....
Q)O
>0 U
:;:;N CJ)
COL.()
e.....
L....... '"
2-.:t '"
<t::o ~ -.:t
Z N ("I') ("I') N ("I')
<(
0::
1-'"
J:O::
(90 L.() L.() "<t ("I') N .....
-I-
Wu
~~
e
0 >-
:;:; ::::
CO 15
.2
- .en
~ en
<( Q)
0:: en 0
"C 0
W e <t::
I- ~ Q)
0') 0:: Q) 0
=t:t: e
Q) U ~ CO
- Z "~ e
a5 Q)
0 0 -
~ e
Q5 ~ e .-
E e CO
~ co~
:::J a:"C
....J CO
<t: - e
e ~co
> Q) g-
w E e e
CO 0
e ~ :;:; 0::::;:;
0 -
"E CO
+-' .:: g-li>
en > - L..
o c:: CO C1) o 0-
UW CJ) c.. ....JO
~
I
r:
~hoc..
-
"C
Q)
"C
e
C1)
("I') E
c.o E
o
o
<D
0::
-
(") .....
L.() N
-
0
r-...
Q)
>- Cl
- CO
"C
0 c..
.C
0-
-
en
Q)-
.c en
OlQ)
"- .0
.c Q)
lD.c
.c -
-0)
Ole
c:: .-
W "- Q)
Q).o
0::: .o"<t
0 L.()..c:
U .c;'.:::
CJ) ;'.::: := ....
...I :="<tE
<t: L.() 0 0
I- o - co
0 -.....L.L.
I- ..... --
_o.c
o Q) .!:2>
<D - <D
-co~
co 0
o (/) ><
(/) .. .::s:-
...::s:- e
o e co
_coo:::
~o::
u. Q) II
_ 0) <D
..c: co ....
O)L..O
"_ C1) 0
Q)~(/)
~. :
'" '" ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
iI
iI
iI
NO LU
a::: LO 0 CO CO CO ('I')
="=0 0 ...... ...... .....
Q)O
>0 U
:;::;0 en
<<l.....
C......
L..~ iI
.$0 iI
~O ~
Z ('I') N ~ N ('1')('1')
~
a:::
iI
iI
iI
LU
...... ..... a::: LO 0 CO CO CO ('I')
="=0 0 ...... ..... .....
Q)O
>0 U
.- N en
roLO
E:::: iI
Q)~ iI
==0 ~
~O Z ('I') N ~ N ('I') ('I')
~
I- iI
J:a:::
(90 LO lO -.:t ('I') N ......
-I-
LUU
3:~
c
0 >-
:;::l ==
<<l :0
.2:
- '(i.j
~ II)
~ Q)
a::: II) u
'0 U
LU c ~
0 I- <<l Q)
...... a::: :;::; u
="= Q) C
U ~ <<l
Q) Z g c
- Q)
en 0 C,.) -
~ C
~ C '(ij
Q) E c
~ <<l ::E
~ (ij a. '0
....J
~ - & c
C <<l
> Q) g C
w E c
<<l 0
C ~ E a::: :;::;
e 'E c: <<l
- L..
II) 'S; ..- L.. C Q)
0 C <<l Q) 0 Co
U LU en a. ....J 0
~
l~.f
-:t tOe..
CO
LO
,......
'0
Q)
'0
C
Q)
CO E
LO E
o
u
Q)
a:::
-
......
N
"-
o
CO
Q)
0)
<<l
a.
~
'1::
o
'1::
Co
w
a:::
o
U
en
....J
~
I-
o
I-
-
II)
~Ci5
.2>~
..c Q)
Q)..c
..c -
-0)
O)c
,!:: '(i)
Q).D
.D~
LO..c
..c :!:::
:!::: ;: L..
;: ~ 0
LO t5
o .9 <<l
-......LJ.
:'01:
o OJ .2>
..92(ij~
<<lU>
U en X
~~~
L.. C C
o <<l <<l
o a::: a:::
~ OJ II
_ 0) Q)
..c <<l '-
.2> Q) 8
OJ~en
~. :
iI iI iI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
..
..
C\ltO W to
0::: 1t) 0 0> eX)(\')
~O 0 or- C\I or-
ClJO
>0 U
,- 0 (f)
(tieX)
cor-
.... or- ..
ClJ~ ..
-0 ~
<(0 z (\') ~ ~ (\') ~ (\')
~
..
..
..
or- ex) W
0::: 0 0 to to to (\')
:;to 0 or- or- or-
ClJO
>0 U
.- 0 (f)
-N
~I'
.... or- ..
ClJ~ ..
==0 ~
<0 Z N C\I ~ N (1) (\')
~
t-"
:r:0:::
(.90 1t) LO ~ (1) N or-
_t-
wU
~~
e
0 >-
:;:; :::
~ :.0
.g
- 'in
~ rn
< ClJ
0::: rn ()
"'0 ()
W e <
or- t- ~ ClJ
or- 0::: ;:; ()
:;t ClJ e
U ~ ~
ClJ Z g e
- ClJ
U5 0 () -
~ e
Q) ~ e '(ii
.5 e :E
~ ~
::::> c:: "'0
-J ~
~ - ~ e
e ~
ClJ ~ e
W E c
~ 0
e ~ E 0::: :;:;
e 'E g ~
... .- ClJ
rn > - ....
o e ~ ClJ 0 Co
uw (f) 0- -J 0
1
I
h
.:t \OC
-
"'0
ClJ
"'0
e
ClJ
or- E
I' E
o
()
ClJ
0:::
-
or-
1t) or-
N
-
0
0>
>- ClJ
- Ol
'C <<l
0 a..
'C
Co
.....
rn
ClJ-
..c rn
O)ClJ
.- .c
..c ClJ
ClJ..c
..c -
-Ol
Ole
e .-
W .- ClJ
ClJ.c
0:: .c~
0 1t)..c
U ..c :::
(f) ::: ;: ....
-J ;:~E
~ 1t) 0 ()
o - ~
0 -or-lJ..
t- or-__
_o.c
o ClJ .2>
ClJ - ClJ
-~~
~ ()
() (f) x
(f)".:.::
" .::.::: e
o e ~
-~o:::
~o:::
LJ.. ClJ 1\
_ Ol ClJ
..c ~ ....
0)....0
._ ClJ ()
ClJ~(f)
~ iC :
.. .. ..
I
I
I
I
I
...
...
...
('/')T""" W
0:: 0 0 "I (0 CON
~O 0 T""" T""" T"""
<DO
>0 0
.- "I en
.....('/')
~I"-
'- T"""
<Doq-
=:0 ...
<(0 ...
:::c:
z ('\j ('\j ('/') ('\j C")('\j
~
...
...
...
"1(0 W
0:: LC':l LC') (0 (0 cx)('/')
:;t::0 0 T""" T""" T"""
<DO
>0 0
.- 0 en
roCO
c:T"""
'- T""" ...
<D~ ...
=:0 :::c:
<(0 Z ('/') ('/') """ N "<t ('/')
~
...
...
...
w (0
T"""CO 0:: 0 0 (0 CO ('\j
~O 0 T""" T""" T"""
<DO
>0 0
..N en
eu,....
C:T"""
'-oq- ...
20 ...
<(0 :::c:
z ('\j ('\j "<:t N C") ('\j
~
1-'"
J:O::
(DO LC') LC') """ ('/') N T"""
-I-
wo
~;t
e:
0 >-
.. ==
eu :0
.~
- '(ii
~ II)
<( <D
II) u
0:: -c u
W c: <(
C\I I- eu <D
0:: += u
T""" <D e:
~ 0 ~ eu
Q) Z .~ c:
- <D
en 0 u .....
~ e:
Q) ~ c: eu
E c: ::E
~ eu
:::> ro c:: -c
..J
<( - ~ c:
c: co
> <D g. c:
w E c:
co 0
c: ~ E 0:: :;::
- .g co
.E g '-
~ III
en > .... C-
o c: eu <D 0
OW en a. ..J 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(0
oq-
-
-c
Q)
-c
c:
Q)
('/') E
(0 E
o
u
Q)
0::
-
o
LC':l
>-
-
.C
o
.C
Co
W
0::
o
o
en
..J
4:
I-
o
I-
-
en
~(;)
.2l~
..c: <D
Q)..c:
..c: .....
-Ol
Ole:
.s '03
<D.o
.o"<:t
LC')..c:
..c:::::
:::: ~ '-
~"<:t.8
LC') 0 U
o ..... eu
-T"""u..
::'OE
o Q) .2l
~(ij~
(1](.);>
(.) Cf) x
Cf) ..
..~ ~
.... e: e:
.8 co eu
(.)0::0::
~ <D II
_ Ol Q)
..c: co '-
.Q) V 8
Q) ~ (I)
~. :
'" ... '"
1 C) 5
'.
4- \Oc...
T"""
('\j
-
o
o
T"""
<D
Ol
(1]
a.
I
I
I
I
I
I
'"
'"
'"
NO W
0:: 0 U') N (0 (O('t')
~O 0 ..- ..- ..-
(1)0
>0 0
.- CO CJ)
-(0
~,....
.... ..- '"
(1)..q- '"
~O ~
<t:O Z N M M N MM
~
'"
'"
'"
..-(0 LU
0:: U') U') C\l m CO "<t
~O 0 ..- ..- ..-
(1)0
>0 U
. - ..q- CJ)
-0
~I'--
.... ..- '"
(1)..q- ~
~O ~
<t:o Z ("t') ("t') ("t') M ..q- ..q-
~
1-'"
I 0::
(90 I.() U') ..q- ("t') C\l ..-
-I-
wU
~~
e:
.2 >-
16 :!:
.2: :0
- 'en
~ l/l
<( (1)
l/l U
0:: -0 U
W e: <t:
('t') I- co OJ
;: U
..- 0:: <1) e:
~ U ~ co
<1) Z g e:
- (1)
U5 0 U -
~ e:
Qi ~ e: 'co
E e: ~
~ co
:::> a.. -0
-l co
<t: - ~ e:
e: co
> (1) g e:
W E e:
co 0
e: ~ E 0:: +=
0 .~ co
....., .!::: g ....
l/l > (1)
..... 0.
o e: co <1) 0
ow CJ) a.. -l 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 ,-0'1 ~
'..J'
:t \oc-
C\l
U')
-
-0
(1)
-0
e:,
<1)
C") E
CO E
o
U
(1)
0::
.........
..-
N
.....
o
..-
.....
~
'C:
o
'C:
0.
<1)
Ol
CO
0..
W
0::
o
U
CJ)
-l
<(
I-
o
I-
-
l/l
~cn
.!2l ~
.c Q)
~~
-0>
Ole:
.S 'Q)
(1).0
.o..q-
I.().c
.c:=:
:!: :;: ....
:;: ..q- 0
LOOt)
o ..... CO
-......u..
..........-
.....O.c
o OJ ,!2l
.92ro~
COU:>
U CJ) X
CJ)".:.:::
" .:.::: e:
o e: CO
_COo::
UO::
~ Q) II
..... 0> <1)
.c CO ....
.!2l Q; 8
<1)~CJ)
~.. :
~ '" '"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
...
...
...
C\/C\/ W co
0:: IJj L() co CO"<:t
:;to 0 ..- ...... ......
<1>('1')
>0 U
.- 0 00
~~
~ ...... ...
<1>"<:t ...
:=:0 ~
<(0 Z ('f) ('f) "<:t C\/ ('f)"<:t
~
...
...
...
......c:o w CO
0:: IJj L() CO CO "<:t
:;to ...... ......
<1>0 0
>0 U
'- 0 00
....C\/
~l'--
~ ...... ...
<1>"<:t ...
:=:0 ~
<(0 Z ('f) ...... "<:t N (") ..q-
~
I- ...
I 0::
(90 IJj IJj -.:t ('I') N ......
-I-
wU
~~
e
.Q ~
ro
~ :0
'en
~ rn
<( <1>
rn ()
0:: "'0 ()
W e <(
"<:t I- ro <1>
0:: ;; ()
...... <1> e
:;t U ~ ro
<1> Z .~ e
.... <1>
Ci5 0 () -
~ e
Q) ~ e .-
E e ro
~ ro~
:::> Q.."'C
...J ro
<( - <1> e
e ro
> <1> c:g e
W E .5 ro 0
e I~ :::0:: :;:::
.... .g .~ g ro
~
<1>
II) > - 0.
o e ro <1> 0
I UW 00 Q.....J 0
1 0
5
:i \ce...
..-..
"'C
<1>
"'C
e
<1>
C\/ E
CO E
o
()
Q)
c:::
-
N ......
IJj C\/
-
0
N
......
.c <1>
0)
'c Ctl
0 Q..
'c
0.
-
II)
Q)-
..c:1I)
0)<0
.- .a
..c: <0
Q)..c:
..c: .....
-0)
O)e
e .-
W .- <0
Q).a
r:x: .a"<:t
0 1Jj..c:
U :S~
00 .- 3: ~
...J 3:"<:t.9
<( IJj 0 ()
I- o-Ctl
0 -......lJ..
I- ......-....
_o..c:
o Q) .2'
<0 - Q)
-Ctl~
Ctl ()
() 00 x
00....:.::
i..: ~ e
o Ctl Ctl
uo::O::
~ Q) II
_ 0) <0
..c:Ctl....
O)~o
._ <0 ()
Q)~OO
~... :
... ... ...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
oil
oil
oil
M<O W <0
0:: U') U') en COC'l
::;:t:0 0 ,... ,... ,...
Q)O
>0 0
.- .q- (f)
-0
~r-...
... ,...
Q).q-
':=:0 oil
<0 oil
::::c::::
~ M C"') .q- C"') .q-C'l
oil
oil
oil
C'l<O W
0:: 0 0 <0 <0 <0 C'l
::;:t:0 0 ,... ,... ,...
Q)O
>0 0
-- co (f)
-~
~r-...
... ,... oil
Q).q- ~
':=:0
<0 z C\I C'l ~ C'l M C'l
<
0::
oil
oil
oil
,... <0 W
0:: 0 0 CO <0 <0 C'l
::;:t:0 0 ,... ,... ......
Q)O
>0 0
-- 0 (f)
-<0
~r-...
... ,... oil
Q).q- oil
':=:0 ::::c::::
<0 z C'l C'l .q- C\I M C'l
~
I- oil
::CO::
(.90 U') U') .q- C"') C\I ,...
-I-
wO
$:~
c:
0 ~
:.;:::
m :c
.g:
- "(ij
~ (/)
< Q)
0:: (/) U
"C ~
W c:
U') ?- m Q)
;: U
,... 0:: Q) c:
::;:t: 0 ~ m
Q) Z .~ c:
- Q)
US 0 U -
~ c:
Q) t= c: .-
< E c: m
$: m::a
:::::l ro c::"C
...J
< - c:
c: ~co
> Q) g
W E c: c:
co 0
c: ~~ 0:::';:::
- .g co
(/) > ~ ... gOi
o c: co Q) o 0.
OW (f)a... ...JO
105
:tt \oc-
-
"C
Q)
"C
c:
Q)
L() E
<0 E
8
Q)
0::
-
o
U')
o
L()
,...
C\.l
-
o
M
,...
u.J
c::
o
o
(f)
...J
<(
I-
o
I-
~
-c
o
'C
0.
00
~(;)
0) co
.- .0
.c. Q)
Q).c.
.c.-
-0)
o)c:
.S -Q)
Q).o
.o.q-
U').c.
.c.::::
:::: :;: ...
:;: .q- 0
U') t5
oEco
-,...LJ..
......--
_0-'=
o Q) .9
Q)-Q)
-ctl:>
roo;>
U(f)x
(f)..~
...: -2 c:
.9 ro co
uc::C::
~ Q) II
_ 0) Q)
.c. ctl ...
.9 Oi 8
Q)~(f)
~ it :
" " "
Q)
0)
co
a...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'"
'"
'"
C'\I..... W
fY LO 0 C'\I <0 <O"I:t
~O 0 ...... ...... .....
Q)O
>0 U
,- 0 en
-"I:t
:glXl
'- ....., '"
Q)"<t ~
-0
<(0 z ('f') C'\I ('f') C'\I ('f')"I:t
~
'"
'"
'"
W
..... ...... fY LO 0 C'\I <0 C\I"I:t
~O 0 ..... ..... ......
Q)O
>0 U
'- lXl en
-C\J
:glXl
'- ...... '"
(1)"I:t '"
=0 ~
<(0 Z ('f') C\I ('f') C\I ..... "I:t
~
1-'"
:x:fY
(,?O LO LO "I:t ('f') C'\I .....
-I-
wU
~~
e
0 ~
;:
ctl :0
g "Ci)
~ rJ)
<( CI)
rJ) u
fY '"0 U
W e <(
<0 I- ctl Q)
fY :;:: u
..... Q) e
~ U ~ ctl
Q) Z .~ e
;t:: Q)
en 0 u -
~ e
~ e '(ij
Q) E e :E
~ ctl
:::> m a.. '"0
..J
<( ..... ~ e
e ctl
> Q) g e
W E e
ctl 0
e ~ E fY ;:
0 'E ctl
....... .!::: g I.-
Q)
rJ) > - l.- e.
o e ctl Q) 0
uw en a.. ..J 0
1 U 5
4tt.
-
"'0
Q)
"'0
e
Q)
('f') E
LO E
o
u
Q)
0::
'-"
0) ......
"I:t C'\I
-
0
"I:t
.....
~ Q)
0>
'i:: ctl
0 c..
'i::
e.
-
rJ)
Q)-
.s:: rJ)
0><1)
.- .0
.s:: <1)
Q).s::
.s::-
..... 0>
O>e
e .-
W .- <1)
Q).o
0:: .o"l:t
0 LO.s::
U .c;t::
en ;t:: 3: '-
..J 3:"I:t..9
<( LO 0 u
I- o-ctl
0 -.....1..1-
I- .....--
_o.c
o <1) .2>
<1) - <1)
-co~
ctl u
U en x
en..~
.. ~ e
o e ctl
_coo::
UfY
~ CI) II
..... 0> CI)
.c: co '-
0>.....0
._ <1) U
<1>>CJ)
~ <(..
'" ..
.. .. ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
"
"
C'\I'<t W 0 C'\I
c::: LO to to'<t
~o a ..... ..... .....
(1)0
>0 ()
. - C'\I (j)
-0')
CCtO
E..... "
(I)'<t "
==0 ~
<(0 Z C'") C'\I C"') C'J C'")'<;f'
~
"
"
"
.....to W C'J
c::: LO LO 0') to '<t
~o a ..... ..... .....
(1)0
>0 ()
.- to (j)
-0')
CCtO
E..... "
(I)-.:t ..
==0 ~
<(0 Z C"') C'") C'") C'") C'") v
~
1-"
:CO::
(!)a LO LO '<t C'") C'J .....
-I-
wU
~~
c:
0 >-
:;:::; ==
ca :0
g 'Ci)
~ rn
<( ~
c::: rn
"0 0
W c: <(
....... !:: ca (I)
..... 0:: :;::; 0
~ (I) c:
U ~ CC
(I) Z .~ c:
- (I)
i:i5 a 0 -
~ c:
15 ~ c: 'm
E c: ~
~ cc
:J Q.. "0
....J ro
~ - ~ c:
c: cc
(I) g c:
w E c:
cc 0
c: ~~ 0:: :;:;
- .g cc
g ....
rn > ~ .... (I)
o c: cc (I) 0 a.
UW (j)Q.. ....J a
:U:lc{,
C")
LO
-
"0
(I)
"0
c:
(I)
..... E
to E
o
o
(I)
0::
'-'
>-
-
"C
o
'i::
a.
w
c:::
a
U
(j)
....J
<(
I-
a
I-
-
<I.l
(1)-
.c. <I.l
C)(I)
'- .c
.c. CD
CD.c.
.c. -
- C)
C)c:
c: .-
.- CD
(I).c
.c'<t
LO.c.
.c.:=:
:=: 3: ....
3:v12
LO 0 0
o - ca
-.....I.J..
.....--
_o.c.
o (I) .S!l
CD - (I)
-CC:>
CCo:>
(.) (j) )(
(j)..~
.. ~ c:
o c: ro
_CCcr:
00::
~ (I) II
_ C) (I)
.c. CC ....
C) .... 0
.- (I) 0
(I)~(j)
~.. :
" " "
r~
I.'
.....
C'\I
-
o
LO
.....
(I)
OJ
CC
Q..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
...
...
...
N..... W
0::: L() 0 c.o c.o COC")
:;to 0 ..... ..... .....
Cl)0
>0 U
.- 0 Cf)
-CO
~c.o
.... ..... ...
CI)'<:t ...
=::0 ::::e:
<(0 Z C") N '<:t N '<:t C")
~
...
...
...
..... en W c.o
0::: LO 0 c.o c.o C")
:;to 0 ..... ..... .....
Cl)0
>0 U
.- N Cf)
-,....
~,....
.... ..... ...
CI)'<:t ~
=::0
<(0 Z C") ~ '<:t ~ C") C")
~
~...
:co:::
(90 L() L() '<:t C") ~ .....
-~
wU
~Lt
c
.2 >.
cu :::
.9 :0
- '(ij
~ tf)
<( CI)
tf) t)
0::: '1J t)
W c <(
co !:: <0 CI)
..... 0::: :;::; t)
:;t CI) c
U ~ <0
CI) Z .~ c
- CI)
i:i5 0 t) .....
~ c
i= c .-
CI) <( E c <0
~ <o::E
::> C-'1J
....J <0
<( - CI) c
C <0
> CI) Qlg c
w E .5 <0 0
c I~ =0::: :;;
- .g .~ g <0
....
tf) > CI)
- 0-
o C <0 ~1.3
UW Cf) 0
1
4lCL
r::'
.J
.........
'1J
Q,)
'1J
C
Q,)
co E
L() E
o
t)
Q,)
0:::
-
(C .....
LO ~
-
0
(0
.....
>. Q,)
- en
'C <0
0 C-
.C
0-
-
tf)
Q,)-
..c: tf)
enQ,)
.- .0
..c: IV
Q,)..c:
..c: -
- en
enc
c .-
W .- Q,)
Q,).o
0::: .o'<:t
0 L()..c:
U ..c: :::
Cf) ::: 3: ....
....J 3:'<:tE
<( LOOt)
~ o - <0
0 -.....u.
~ .....--
_o..c:
o Q,) .2>
Q,) - Q,)
-<o~
<0 t)
t) Cf) x
Cf)..,,:.::
i..: ~ C
0<0<0
00:::0:::
~ <I) II
_0)<1)
..c: <0 ....
en"" 0
'- <I) t)
Q,)~CJ)
~ ~ :
... " "
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
"
"
"
C\lC\l W co
c::: 0 0 CO COC\l
:;to 0 ..... ..... .....
(1)0
>0 0
:;:::;-.:t en
ro,....
c::.....
'--.:t "
20 "
<0 ~ ('I'")C\l
Z C\l N -.:t C\l
~
"
"
"
..... Q) W CO
0:: ll) 0 CO CO ('I'")
:;to 0 ..... ..... .....
(1)0
>0 0
.- C\l en
-,....
ro,.....
E..... ..
(I)-.:t "
'=:0 ~
<0 z ('I'") N -.:t N ('I'") ('I'")
~
1-"
:CO::
C!)O ll) ll) -.:t ('I'") N .....
-I-
wO
~~
c::
0 >-
:;:: ~
ro :0
.g 'Ci)
:=:
::a: en
< (I)
en u
0:: -0 U
W c:: <
Q) !::: ~ (I)
..... c::: ai u
:;t c::
0 ~ ro
(I) Z .~ c::
- (I)
i:i5 0 u -
~ c::
~ c:: .tij
(I) E c:: ::a:
~ ro
:::> co Q.. -0
...J
< - ~ c::
c:: ro
> (I) ~ c::
W E c::
ro 0
c:: ~~ 0:: :;::
0 ro
..... .= g '-
en > ~ (I)
o c:: ro (I) 0 0.
OIW enQ.. ...J 0
o
ll)
..-..
-0
(I)
-0
c::
(I)
co E
ll) E
o
u
(I)
0::
-
>-
-
'C
o
'C
0.
W
0::
o
o
en
...J
<
I-
o
I-
-
en
(1)-
.c: en
.Q>~
.c: Q)
(I).c:
.c: -
- Ol
Ole:
.5 'CD
(1)..0
-O-<:t
ll).c:
.c: ::::
:::: :;: '-
:;: -<:t 0
ll) t5
o .9 ro
-.....LJ..
:o:c
o Q) .9
~ro~
roO;>
(0)><
(J)...,Y.
.. .:s:. C
o c:: ro
_ro""
UO::u..
~ Q) II
_ Ol (I)
.c: ro '-
.9 Q5 8
(I)~(J)
~ it :
.. .. ..
!.J
1
~..
o
~ {DC..-
.....
C\l
<0-
o
,....
.....
(I)
Ol
ro
0..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
..
..
NC"') W N
0:: LO l.() 0) <O"<t
~O 0 ~ ~ ~
C1)0
>0 ()
"- <0 CJ)
-C"')
COC"')
EC"') ..
C1)"<t ..
'=:0 ~
<(0 Z C"') C"') C"') C"') C"')"<t
~
..
..
..
...- I"- W N
~O 0:: LO l.() C"') CO ~
0 ...-
C1)0
>0 ()
-- CO CJ)
-0
E~ ..
C1)"<t ..
=0 ~
<(0 Z ...- ...- C"') ...- C"') ...-
~
1-"
:CO::
(90 l.() l.() "<t C"') C\l ...-
-I-
wO
~~
e
0 >.
:;::; =:
g :0
'en
~ III
<( C1)
rn 0
0:: "0 ~
W e
0 I- CO C1)
0:: :;:::l 0
N C1) e
~ () ~ CO
C1) Z .~ e
- C1)
i:i5 0 0 -
~ e
~ e .-
C1) E e CO
~ co~
:::> n; 0."0
...J
<( - e
e ~co
> C1) go
W E e e
CO 0
e ~ E 0:::;::;
- .g 'E CO
g.Qi
rn > ..... ....
o e CO C1) o 0.
OW CJ) a. ...JO
1 (: r::
,)
*tCC-
-
"0
C1)
"0
e
C1)
~ E
<0 E
o
o
Q)
0::
-
N ~
C"') C\l
.....
0
CO
....
>. C1)
- 0)
.t: CO
0 a.
"t:
0.
-
rn
CD-
.c rn
0) CD
.- .0
.c CD
C1)..c::
.c -
- Ol
Ole
e .-
W .- C1)
C1).o
0::: .o"<t
0 l.()..c::
() ..c::=:
CJ) =: == ....
...J ==vE
<( l.() 0 0
I- 0- co
0 -~u.
I- ~.....-
..... o..c::
o CD .Q>
CD - C1)
-ro~
ro 0
o CJ) x
CJ) .. ..x:
.. .lo:: e
o e co
_roo:::
00::
tf C1) II
_ 0) C1)
.c co ....
0)....0
.- C1) 0
Q)~CJ)
~ iI :
.. .. ..
-
.
.
.
.
.
...
...
...
C\lCO W c\j
a: Ln 0 CO COoq-
=*&:0 ...... ...... ......
CDO 0
>0 0
.- co C/)
10......
e:'<t
....('t) ...
CD'<t ~
:=::0
<(0 Z ('t) C\I ('t) C\I ('t)oq-
~
...
...
...
...... ('t) W Ln
tY Ln C\I CO CO -.::t
=*&:0 0 ...... ...... ......
CDO
>0 0
.- co C/)
-('t)
to('t)
E('t) '"
CD-.::t '"
:=::0 ~
<(0 Z ('t) ('t) ('t) C\I ('t) -.::t
~
1-'"
J:tY
(90 LO LO -.::t ('t) C\l ......
-I-
wO
~~
e:
0 >-
:;:; ==
to :0
,2:
~ '(i)
~ en
<( CD
tY en 0
"'C 0
W e: <(
...... I- (t\ CD
C\I tY ;:l 0
CD e:
=*&: 0 ~ to
CD Z ,~ e:
- CD
en 0 0 -
~ e:
CD ~ e: .-
E e: to
~ (t\~
:::> (t\ e."'C
...J
<( - e:
e: ~(t\
> CD g:
w E e: e:
to 0
e: ::~ 0:::;:;
- ,g (t\
g Q;
en > ~....
o e: (t\ CD o a.
OW C/)e. ...JO
.
.
.
I.
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
('t)
LO
-
"'C
CD
"C
e:
CD
CO E
LO E
o
o
CD
tY
-
W
0::
o
o
C/)
...J
<(
I-
o
I-
::-
'C
o
'C
a.
li)
~li)
,2l~
.I:: CD
CD.I::
.I:: -
- 0)
O)e:
.f: '0:;
CD.c
.ooq-
Ln.I::
.I::~
~ 3: ....
3: -.::t 0
LO 13
o .9 (t\
-......u..
::CS:E
o CD ,2l
J!2ro~
tOO>
o C/) X
C/)".:s:.
.. .:s:. e:
o e: (t\
_to,.".
OtY'-'-
~ CD II
_ 0) CD
.I:: (t\ ....
0)....8
._ CD
CD~C/)
~ '" :
'" '" '"
*\oc..
......
C\I
....
o
0')
......
CD
0)
to
e.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i~;.
.:tt-lD C.
APPENDIX B
Maps of Alternative Well Sites
Well Site Justification Study - November 2003.doc
OR..L.V ANCI HAN..N ....a
r- 1 0 () 5
)
:t tOe..
Q
Jl !
. t
.
r i
.
-< i
)
2 i I
a ".f' I
..;,f" !
I i
)
z li~ - --1 f J I
. " ;!
. ," j~ c
Z ~, I
~ ~ ~ ~ " i !
~~~ ~ ~ J
~
~ I
~
PROPOSm I
15' UTI.J1Y ~
~
,~ EXlSlING 4. SNf'fAR'f FORCE toWN
...
c:
'"
I
~
~
~ !
- -. h- I
PVD - WHI1t:: ~
NXJSTIlW. CORP, P.w< ~ I
ff- ,~ ,4'
.,s"'-'; " .,J' -'
~.- ,_._--_.~--~,-^
.. I i
-" .- ", $
....- . ,. " I,
-_.~--_._-
-;::I ....1 ,ft ~l' , .",<
'"
""f' I .......#. I'" I .~
I ..-111
.. i 9ECK llLVO.
_""J;-
\''-~ snE 110,7
:1'/./
I
. j
.Y' --.
, ',/
-~ ::'/$ .~~t;/: ',/ "ft
, ~...,' ""',-,Y ,r " ..
.~>';,,~:,,>:;:;ii~~~~~:;::<;)<.)>~J.:, .</)(,:>;/. .
'( ~:i> ~ <> ';': ,</ ,:,':: ":/ '.
<~.~/ /"/ ,,:: '>,'. : .-:/
. ,",/J '...,.." .
~{i. if,,,Y;fi'(\1f/<
.:~B:.}::;':'~',;:',": ::V'~..~ ~'-' '.
)~
:~
:~,
/',',
..':)',
/x~-/.' :,
~!!~
~~s~
iel~
I~I
d
I t
.....'
,,'
',." /'
\. ,)(J:.' ~:~;."
"X 'il ""
:>~.
. J.-./.... ~ ...
" '>',' -/ ,.,-',
MATCH LI"E (SEE FIGURE 2)
~ ~ \
o
:II
.
.
I"
.
-<
)
z
a
:t
)
Z
.
.
z
I'lllll"lDla) 'Jli' ..., 1WD
TlWW r.....d..1
fIJ</&'
","--
"
1
. . ~
l.'~>:: ., .~
."/
//
I" ...h
~ ~. t.J I
~ I L
I \' ""-ww.SlT[HO...}
~ I !ol.'I'!ll*'TM: J
CXf3 iil I
I
I t
I
'I I
.'
I I
I
I i .
.
...
Mll. ~ MO.J
Al.l'EIlN"1l\/E 2
I'.....~I IWW.. sn: HO.. /'
· i Al..l'ERNoU'NE :1.../
EJ.. SItt NO.3
'~1
!.ii
~lIOJ..w:t<<M
~,1'
4. .,,'~
PflOI'OSEl:l
IS' \11M'I' ~
ill! I'
~I~
151
i !
~ '
WEIJ.. sn: ~
MJ'ERHATM 1-"
.,1'
"
~..w..sn:NO..II
~.2
-~ ~-,..<-"... ,.
~
"_,,,of
MATCH UNE (HE FtoUU 3)
"
<,' ,"
.~. .. ,II
,;.
,"
," <,;'
....:-"
f ... ..,.,.....
~ .,'
C%IZ
I I I
'1 ,. ]
1
)
1 0
'" f)
*IO~
t
CI I'
I
f-
a
1 0 0 5
*(OC
iii
:II
.
.
,.
.
-<
)
Z
D
I
)
Z
.
.
Z
I' ,. WE1L" SITE NO.7
..1."".' . N..~1NE ,2'.WlU.. 'SITE' NO.8.. '"
' , '. 'N..1UlHo\1'Mt2 '
" ' : ' fIRCPOliQ)'~ ' ""'\
'::,~l ... 'RAW" WAmuwN <.:\',
Wfll ~ ~J'
AL'IEllNo'TM: 1
LWfll SITE NO.II
~TM: 2
WEIJ. SITE NO.7J
AL'IEllNo'TM: 1
I
t
i ! I
,. ,. !
i I
[
I f ~ NO 11 WEIJ. SITE NO.12 AL'IEllNo'TM: 17
....JDlW..1M i AL'IEllNo'TM: J),PIlClPOSEll 12. wn.L. WEll.gJE :,;'"J
:;J I WEll. Sl'Tt NO.12, RAW WATER \oWN" ALTDlNATM: 2
II ALTDlNATM: 2 " ..-.')
.-" ".~---~m NO.12 . ,.. . '
~ 1 \ ALTtRNol.TM: 1 ~ .'
all ~~11
PAOPOSEll 20" RAW 'Note!
l1tN~ ---. WAIN
I:l.
I
I
I
I
I
:'11 I
~~I~ i
If
I I
~ '
wn.L. SItE NO.17
.....1EIlN"lIII'E 1
.'~ .
WEIJ. SITE NO. 111 ,
AL1"EI'l*TM: 3'
WELL Sl'Tt NO. l!i
.....TEIlNo\TM: 1
~
z
"
PUO - SWAMP IlUGGT tv.'l"S
J
PUOI - FIllSI' ASSOoIIl.Y "1lISJRl'
EDUCA1lOIl All) ~l1OM
WEU.. SITE NO.17
N..l"ERMlllll'E 2
~~SlTENO.2.}
MATCH LINE (SEE FlGURE 41
,"- 1 0
)
Q
]I
.
.
,.
.
-<
It
Z
o
%
It
Z
.
.
12
I~
.
MATCH LINE (SEE FIGURE 31
t
.' I
WQ.l.. 2TE HCl.2.J!'.
~J- .
WflJ. SITE NO.2J ?
~1~1
f'\JO - s.MP 8UlI1Cl'f 1>>.'1'1
..
..
,/'
E1. 11II: IlD.ll1.,\. .
~2
llO.L sm: NO.II
~I--
~
i
~lIIJJ. sm: NO.lI
\=:,:
~2
I'IlCJ'OliED
I&' \MIl'I'
f'\JO - twMJCK P>VIK
QClIMJlC( ~ s'-
I>R()PO!5El) If'
_ w.uDt .....
IIIW. SITE MO.:lll
Al.~ 1 "'\
\.- i~lIC.I. snr NO.ZI - - - -
Al.1'tFIM>. 1M: 1
WELL !ITf NlU2
N.JIJIMIlIM: 2
fIIlllPOSID Ill" RoW _1tR
nwors>- _
170' R'\. I'ASDIDn'
I
,! ".~'~~
~~r;o.o.t)
~ WELL !1111!: MCl.21
/IL1'EJlMjlIM 2
~ sm: HlU.O J'j
Al.1'tFIM>.rr.E ~ ,
lIl[l,L SI1t i'lQ.21
Al.1DlM/> IN'( 1
~
~
I
I
I
>.
!
I
'.
,
I
"
ill~ I
I I I
I~;il
i i~ I I I
II ?i
Ii : I~
--..............-.-
": 5
,.
~ \Dt
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I,
1 (\
5
~lDt
COLLIER COUN1Y GOVERN11ENT
South County Regional Water Treatment Plant
'Reverse Osmosis Wellfield Expansion
Well Site and Well Transmission Main Route Study
Technical Memorandwn
GR&&L&V AND HANSIiIN ....c
August 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Tide
Page
1. INT'R.OD UCTI ON. ............ .......... ..... .............. ........... ......... ............ ......... ............. .......... ......... ...... ............ 1
1.1 Background and Purpose .............................................................................................................1
1.2 Scope of Investigations ......................................................................... ......., ................................ 1
1.3 Pipeline Route Selection Methodology ...................................................................................... 1
2. BASIC DATA ......... .......... .................... ..........'........... ............ ................ ............... ....... ............................... 2
2.1 Introduction......................................"........................................".........,......,..,........,..................... 2
2.2 Route Study Area ................... ..................................... ........ ............ ................ ,...... ..,..................... 2
2.3 Aerial Photographs .............., .............' ..................., ....................................................................... 2
2.4 Exis ring U rility Data... ........., ..... .............. ..... ...............................................,...................... ........... 3
2.5 Rights-of-Way and Easements ....,................................................................................................4
2.6 Traffic V olurne.................,....., ...... ................................,.. .................. ............................................ 4
2.7 Field Reconnaissance .......... ............,.. ................................................ ........................................... 4
2.8 Historical Structures and Archeological Sites ...........................................................................5
2.9 Envirorunen tal ,.....................,......,...,...,...,...........,...................................................,........ ............. 5
2.10 Long Range Planning ....................................................................................................................5
3. ALTERNATIVE PIPELINE ROUTES ................................................................................................6
3.1 General............................... ....................., ........................................... ....... ............. ........................ 6
3.2 Description of Alternative Routes ..............................................................................................6
3.2.1 Alternative 1: Florida Power and light Corridor ..................................................................... 6
3.2.2 Alternative 2: Le Buffs Road / FP&L Corridor ....................................................................... 6
3.2.3 Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard / CR 951 ................................................................................... 7
3.3 Discussion of Alternative Routes................................................................................................7
4. EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PIPELINE ROUTES ................ 9
4.1 Cost-Identifiable Evaluation ,... ......... .................................., ........ .... .............. ..............................9
4.1.1 Pipeline Length ..........................................................................,...................................................9
4.1.2 Property Acquisition Considerations..............................,.........................................................10
4.1.3 Road Restoration ............................................................... '....... ,..................... ............................ 10
4.1.5 Permitting ...,.... ................................................................................................. ........., .................. 11
4.1.6 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost .................................................................................11
4.2 Non-Cost-Identifiable Route Evaluation Criteria ..................................................................12
4.2.1 Development/Ranking of Criteria.. ......... ....... .................... ....... ............ ....... ............................12
4.2.2 Rating the Routes Against Criteria.".........................................................................................14
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
CilR..I...Y ANC HANliliN LLe
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f.~
;)
1 0
o 5
:i \OC.
5. ROUTE RECO~NDATION ...,............................,........................................................................14
5.3 Recommended Route.... ......... ......... ..................... ................... ......... ...................... ...... ..... ..........14
APPENDICES
A Pipe Sizing and Hydraulics
B Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
C Alternative Route Evaluation matrix
D Detailed Map of Recommended Route
LIST OF FIGURES
1 Area of Apparent Advantageous Hydrogeologic Conditions and Test Well Sites
2 Route Study Area
3 Alternative 1 - FP&L Corridor
4 Alternative 2 - Le Buffs RoadjFP&L Corridor
5 Alternative 3 - Beck BoulevardjCR 951
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
GR.."'.V AND HAN..N LLC
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 0 (' 5
.f.lOc..
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
South County Regional Water Treatment Plant
Reverse Osmosis Wellfield Expansion
Well Site and Well Transmission Main Route Study
Technical Memorandum
G1RliliLEY AND HANSIiN LLC
August 2002
1.
INTRODUCTION
I
1.1 Background and Purpose
I
I
The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the investigations conducted to
establish, evaluate, and compare alternative routes for the well transmission mains and
alternative sites for the wells intended to convey water to the South County Regional Water
Treatment Plant (SCRWI'P). The water supply project will increase the raw water supply
available to the SCRWI'P by approximately 16 MGD yielding an increase in finished potable
water of approximately 12 MGD.
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The intent of this memorandum is to present, in summary form, the findings and
conclusions of these investigations and to formalize recommendations for final route and well
sites selections.
1.2 Scope of Investigations
Greeley and Hansen LLC is the consultant charged with the completion of the pipeline
route and well site investigation. Water Resource Solutions (WRS) is advising on the apparent
suitability of the well sites from a water production and water use permitting purview. The
investigations presented herein comprise the following principle elements:
· Acquire and develop basic data needed for the pipeline route and well site
selection process;
. Develop alternative configurations;
· Evaluate and compare the alternatives;
· Recommend the best configuration based on the results of these investigations.
1.3 Pipeline Route Section Methodology
The methodology employed to identify the best configuration for the well transmission
mains and well sites consists of the following major elements:
· Focus on area of apparent advantageous hydrogeologic conditions;
· Identify potential pipeline route and well site alternatives;
· Develop engineering, regulatory and non-cost identifiable criteria against which
the alternative pipeline routes and well sites are evaluated and compared;
. Evaluate the permitability and constrllctability of the alternatives in the field;
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
GRIi.LIiY AND HAN_IiN ...."
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 ,'\
., 5
.:(!: {O c..
.
Prepare prelimina.ry opltUons of project cost for purposes of comparing the
alternatives; ,
Select and weight the non-cost-identifiable criteria for this project; and
Identify the best pipeline routes and well sites, considering all of the above.
.
.
The best configuration may not necessarily be the least expensive in sitlliltions where
environmental protection, safety or other considerations override cost.
2. BASIC DATA
2.1 Introduction
Greeley and Hansen llC conducted a feasibility evaluation of this project in August
2001. Each route presented herein considers a maximum 30-inch diameter pipeline capable of
transferring up to 16 million gallons per day. The mainline diameter of each alternative is sized
based on all wells simultaneously running and producing 16 MGD total. Branch lines are sized
assuming a maximum flow from individual wells of 1,000 GPM.
To compare alternatives, it is necessary to acquire information on the various factors
that affect the suitability and cost of each alternative. Comparative evaluations of the
alternatives included the development of probable construction, wetland mitigation, and land
acquisition costs. Pertinent criteria, including safety, environmental, long range planning, and
other criteria, which are not readily cost identifiable, have been assessed by means of an
evaluation matrix. This matrix will be discussed later in the memorandum. Experienced pipeline
and design and construction engineers evaluated these factors with respect to each alternative
alignment in order to rank the alternative alignments.
2.2
Route Study Area
A route study area is simply the area within which alternative routes from Point A to
Point B are developed. In this evaluation, Point A is the connection point with the SCRWfP,
which is the 36-inch stub-out located in the southeast corner of the plant site. Point B is the
approximate 23 well sites located within the area of apparent advantageous hydrogeologic
conditions identified by WRS. Due to project scheduling requirements, three well sites within
this area have been selected to confirm hydrogeological conditions via aquifer performance
testing. This testing must precede permitting and development of the remainder of the
production wells. The target area for wells and the test well sites are shown on Figure 1.
The boundaries of a route study area are often defined by natural and man made
features, which, if crossed by a proposed pipeline route. would result in unnecessary increased
pipeline length and cost which would otherwise be avoided by staying within the route study
area. The limiting factors, in this study area, for developing a multitude of alternative routes are
the crossing of large wetlands and crossing large tracts of undeveloped property, Figure 2 shows
the Route Study Area.
2.3 Aerial Photographs
Recent aerial photographs are helpful in pipeline route selection to identify density of
development, environmentally sensitive lands, highways, railroads, waterways, and other natural
and man made features visible from the air. For this evaluation, GIS files were provided by
Collier County, which include color aerial photography and property lines. Additionally, color
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002 2
I3RII.LIIV AND HANIIIIN ","C
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 0
,..... 5
I,;
::(: \DC.-
aerial photography and property information was also obtained by internet communication with
the Collier County property'appraiser's web site. This photography was a lower resolution than
the GIS files, however, the property information was more up to date.
2.4 Existing Utility Data
Information on existing public utilities, particularly underground utilities, is helpful to
identify potential utility conflicts. Existing large diameter sanitary and storm sewers, sanitary
force mains and water mains are usually the greatest concern. Collier County utility data
collected and reviewed in conjunction with this study included several atlas style maps of existing
and proposed sanitary sewers, force mains, reclaimed water, and potable water mains.
Information from Collier County on existing major utilities indicates the following utilities are
present in the route study area.
I
I
I
Florida Power and Light (FP&L) Corridor
Utility Location
Power lines are aligned approximately 55 feet from
the eastern boundary of the 170-foot wide FP&L
corridor running north and south east ofCR 951.
Along east side of FP&L corridor north White
Lake Corporate Park
High Voltage (B.8kV)
Power Transmission Lines
Sanitary Force Main
Beck Boulevard
Utility
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
12-inch Force Main
Water Main
County Road 951
Utility
,
8-inch 11Z-inch force main
48 -inch water main
20-inch Water Main
Location
Enters Beck Boulevard from the Tollgate
Commercial Center approximately 1,000 feet east
of CR 951 and travels west to CR 951 where it
crosses and exits the study area.
Runs east along Beck Blvd. and serves Toll Gate
RV Park and residential areas along Le Buffs Road.
Location
Enters CR 951 from Forest Glen Blvd then travels
south within the CR 951 right-of-way. 8-inch force
main becomes a 12-inch force main in front of
Naples Golf and Country Club.
The 48-inch water main enters CR 951 from the
SCRwrP and travels south within the right of way
to the intersection of CR 951 and Davis Blvd where
it turns west out of the CR 951 right-of-way.
The 20-inch water main begins at the intersection
of CR 951 and Davis Blvd and travels south within
the CR 951 right-of-way for the entire length of the
study area.
Note: Only information on existing utilities is identified in these tables. Proposed
utilities are discussed later in this memorandum.
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
(JRIi.LIIY AND HAN..N ..c:
3
>'!
I
,...
0"")
.f \OC.
I
I
A review of utilities in the study area indicates that private utilities will have a minimal
effect on route selection. The high voltage power transmission lines located within the FP&L
corridor will have the greatest impact on route evaluations. Other private utility information was
not reviewed for the purpose of route selection. Such utilities include cable TV, gas mains,
telephone conduits, fiber optic conduits, and buried electrical conduits. Generally, but not in all
instances, telecommunications and power distribution lines do not have a significant impact on
route selection. It was determined that private utilities within the corridors identified in each
route alternative would not gready affect the route selection. A more detailed investigation of all
utilities will be completed prior to final design of the pipeline alignment within the route selected
based on this report.
I
I
I
2.5
Right-or-ways and Easements
I
Property information and maps for evaluating right-of-way widths and proposed
easements were obtained and reviewed for this project as follows:
I
Source
Type
GIS information
I
Collier County
Collier County
Real Estate Data, Inc.
Property Appraiser Website
REDI Maps
I
2.6 Traffic Volume
I
Streets with very heavy traffic volume are often not suitable for open trench pipeline
coostruction, particularly if adequate room is not available adjacent to traffic lanes and detours
are inconvenient or not available. Conversely, streets with light traffic volumes may be attractive
for pipeline constrUctioo. Traffic conditions were observed for this study during field
reconnaissance and are summarized as follows:
I
I
Road
T raffle Conditions
I
Interstate 75
Moderately heavy, however, a trenchless
crossing is anticipated.
Moderate. however, a trenchless crossing is
anticipated
Moderate to Light
Heavy traffic during peak hours.
Significant development adjacent to road.
White Lake Boulevard
I
Beck Boulevard
I
County Road 951
I
I
I
2.7 Field Reconnaissance
An important part of pipeline alternative route studies is field reconnaissance to observe
actual conditions along each route, including:
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
GR..L.V AND HANliliN LLe
4
I
::t toe..
I
.
Room for construction;
Presence of wetlands;
Adjacent drainage;
Pavement condition;
Overhead utilities;
Traffic;
Topography I Geotechnical;
Access for special crossings; and
Type and density of commercial and residential development.
.
I
.
.
I
.
.
.
I
.
.
I
Fidd reconnaissance was conducted in the route study area to develop alternatives.
After development of alternatives, field reconnaissance is employed again to confirm feasibility
and identify specific cost items. The results of these observations are included in the discussion
of alternative development and evaluation hereinafter.
I
I
2.8 Historical Structures and Archeological Sites
I
I
I
The Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources maintains
information on sites that may be historically or archeologically significant. The routes reviewed
under this report generally lie v.rithin existing corridors minimizing the potential for disruption of
historical structures or archeological sites. Prior to completion of final design. it is
recommended that the proposed pipeline alignment be reviewed to determine if any historically
significant sites are impacted.
I
2.9 Environmental
I
I
I
For the purpose of this study, pipeline routes generally follow existing utility corridors or
public rights-of-way thus minimizing the envi.t:onmental impact. Branch collector mains to single or
small groups of wells often follow property lines, which may not have been cleared for other
purposes. Although the construction corridors for these smaller pipelines (8 to 16 inches in
diameter) are narrow, environmental impacts may be significant when creating new corridors.
Much of the area is forested wetlands dominated by Cypress trees. Some of the area is
poor quality forested wetlands, which suffer from domination by Mellaleuca, an invasive, exotic
species. The project is clearly in the public interest and thus should be permittable. Impacts to
forested wetlands, however, will likely require mitigation. It is difficult at this point to accurately
quantify costs associated v.rith mitigation because the ratios required by regulatory agencies vary.
The costs developed herein are useful for comparing routes since all alternatives would likely be
a.ssigned the same ratio.
I
I
2.10 Long Range Planning
I
Another important consideration is the interaction of the proposed pipeline with future
projects. Collier County's Water and Wastewater Master Plans published in 2001 identify the
planned water and wastewater utility improvements throughout the county. These docwnents
describe all County proposed capital improvement projects through the year 2021. In addition, the
2006/2007 and 2025 transportation plans, published by the Florida Department of Transportation.
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
GR..L.V AND HAN..N ..a
5
I
l-
;)
1 0
o 5
..t \ Dc..
I
were reviewed. The proposed long-range planning projects within the route study area are as
follows:
I
I
I
. Construct 36" Water Main along County Road 951 from Beck Blvd to
Rattlesnake Hammock Road
. Additional lanes added to County Road 951
3.
ALTERNATIVE PIPELINE ROUTES
3.1 General
I
I
I
Several transmission pipeline alternative routes from the SCRWfP to the test wells were
identified and evaluated. A major consideration in the selection of route alternatives was
existence of roads or utility corridors and environmentally sensitive lands, Alternative routes
were identified based on field observation and review of collected data. Both cost and non-cost
factors were considered in the selection of the alternative routes. Three alternatives were
considered for further study and are titled as follows:
.
Alternative 1: FP&L Corridor
Alternative 2: Le Buffs Road I FP&L Corridor
Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard I CR 951
I
.
.
I
I
These route corridors and well configurations are shown on Figure 3, 4, and 5,
respectively,
3.2 Description of Alternative Routes
I
I
I
I
I
3.2.1 Alternative 1: Florida Power and Light Corridor
The main line of this alternative heads east from the 36-inch stub, at the southeast
comer of the SCRWTP, across the FP&L corridor to the east 30' of the FP&L corridor where it
turns south. The route follows this FP&L corridor southerly across White Lake Boulevard and
Interstate 75, thence continues south across Beck Boulevard to the northern test well site. From
here, the route continues southerly in the east 30 feet of the FP&L corridor approximately 1.5
miles to the central test well site and another 1.5 miles to the terminus at the southern test well
site. Proposed well sites are scattered linearly along the southern 3 miles of the route generally at
one-quarter mile intervals. Along the southern two miles of this route are several opportunities
for lateral branch pipelines to small groups of wells.
I
I
I
3.2.2 Alternative 2: Le Buffs Road / FP&L Corridor
The main line of this alternative heads east from the 36-inch stub, at the southeast
corner of the SCRWfP, across the FP&L corridor to the east 30' of the FP&L corridor where it
turns south. The route follows this FP&L corridor southerly approximately 700 feet to the
north boundary of the White Lake Corporate Park where the route turns easterly along this
boundary. When it reaches the eastern boundary of the corporate park, the route turns
southerly along the boundary to White Lake Boulevard. The route goes approximately one-
eighth mile east-southeast within this right-of-way to a point where it turns south and crosses
White Lake Boulevard, Interstate 75 and Beck Boulevard to Le Buffs Road. This route then
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
tilR..LRV AND HAN.RN LLa
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
=) 1 0
.'.' 5
' j
'J
~ {De.
continues southerly in Le Buffs Road to the end of the maintained right-of-way thence
continues southerly along a' property line approximately 1,000 feet to the south bOW1dary of
Section 1, Township 50 south. Range 26 east. The route then goes west approximately one mile
along this south bOW1dary to the FP&L corridor where it turns southerly in the east 30 feet of
the FP&L corridor approximately one-half mile to the central test well site and another 1.5 miles
to the terminus point at the southern test well site. Proposed well sites are scattered linearly
along Le Buff Road, the east-west section line and along the FP&L corridor at approximate one-
quarter mile intervals. Along the FP&L corridor are several opportunities for lateral branch
pipelines to small groups of wells.
3.2.3 Alternative 3: Beck Blvd. / CR 951
This alternative heads east from the 36-inch stub, at the southeast corner of the
SCRWTP, across the FP&L corridor to the east 30 feet of the FP&L corridor where it turns
south. The route follows this FP&L corridor southerly across White Lake Boulevard and
Interstate 75, thence continuing south across Beck Boulevard to the Northern test well site. At
this point. the route heads west in the south part of Beck Boulevard to County Road 951 and
thence south in County Road 951 right-of-way approximately three miles to the terminus at
Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Proposed well sites would include the north test well site and
wells dispersed linearly along County Road 951 at approximate one-quarter mile intervals.
Along the southerly two miles of this route are several opportunities for lateral branch pipelines
to small groups of wells.
3.3 Discussion of Alternative Routes
Alternative 1: Florida Power and light Corridor
The following discussion generally follows along the route from north to south. Leaving
the plant site, the pipeline will have to share the east 30 feet of the FP&L corridor with a sanitary
force main until it reaches the White Lake Corporate Park (about 1,000 feet). Along the entire
FP&L corridor, the pipeline passes electrical transmission towers spaced at 500 to 600-foot
intervals. These towers are located 55 feet from the east boundary of the 170-foot wide FP&L
easement. Most of the towers are single concrete poles with lateral guy wires, which penetrate
grade 40 feet from the tower. This means a guy wire will be located 15 feet from the east
boundary of the FP&L corridor every 500 to 600 feet. This appears to be the greatest obstacle
to negotiate with the pipe alignment for this route. FP&L was unable to provide any details on
the guy anchors located W1dergroW1d.
The western side of the FP&L corridor was considered, however, only the east 100 feet
of the corridor has been cleared so environmental impacts would have been extreme. In
addition. this is the most likely side for future parallel electrical power transmission facilities,
which makes our encumbrance of the FP&L easement more difficult for FP&L to accept.
White Lake Boulevard is the first roadway encountered. A trenchless crossing is
proposed due to consistent traffic to the landfill and the lack of a convenient detour. This
crossing may have to be accomplished with the Interstate crossing; however, two shorter
crossings would be preferential due to the already long and difficult proposed Interstate
crossing. The Interstate crossing will require micro-tunneling through anticipated hard
limestone and high groundwater tables. This trenchless method will afford the greatest degree
of safety to the Interstate and facilitate permitting.
Route Study Report. August 2002.doc
August 2002
CiI"'..L.V AND HAN..N LLC
7
I
J
1 0
o 5
"*lOL
I
I
The next significant feature along the route is Beck Boulevard, which appears that it
could be open cut and alternating traffic directions maintained for the light residential traffic.
For conservative purposes, a trenchless crossing is assumed to be required. The drainage ditch
within Beck Boulevard right-of-way is proposed to be open cut.
I
I
Pipeline construction just south of Beck Boulevard will require design and construction
coordination to minimize traffic and storage impacts to a local business, which uses the FP&L
easement. South of here, the pipeline crosses the Forest Glen residential and golf course
development. The entrance way could possibly be open-cut utilizing the median to separate
traffic from construction, however, for conservancy, a trenchless crossing is assumed here.
I
I
From here to Rattlesnake Hammock Road, the route crosses very little as far as
development with the exception of one under construction residential development.
I
The well sites associated with this route and the branch transmission mains are all
adjacent to existing property lines and utilize existing dirt roads where available. Impact
associated with these smaller mains should be manageable. Proposed well sites have been
located to attempt to minimize inconvenience to underlying landowners. Areas of concern
include well sites, which will have emergency generators located near developments such as
Forest Glen. Design of generator enclosures should address sound attenuation as well as
aesthetics.
I
Alternative 2: Le Buffs Road / FP&L Corridor
I
The following discussion follows the route generally from north to south. From the 36-
inch stub at the southeast corner of the plant site, this route would cross the FP&L easement
and share the east 30-feet of the FP&L corridor with a sanitary force main until it reaches the
northern boundary of the White Lake Corporate Park (about 1,000 feet). At this point, the
route turns east along the north boundary of the White Lake Corporate Park north of the access
road. At the eastern boundary of the White Lake Corporate Park, the route turns south along
the property line and crosses White Lake Boulevard and Interstate 75. A trenchless crossing of
White Lake Boulevard is proposed due to the consistent traffic to the Landfill and the lack of a
convenient detour. More easily than with Alternative 1, the trenchless crossing of White Lake
Boulevard could be accomplished separately from the crossing of Interstate 75, as more space is
available between the two roads at this crossing location. The trenchless crossing of Interstate
75 under this alternative will be approximately 100 feet shorter than with the other two
alternatives. However. the property for the northern test well site, procurement of which is
already underway. would be unavailable for production of water supply. Testing data from this
site may be useful but would carry a degree of uncertainty due to poor proximity to proposed
production wells.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
South of Interstate 75 the route travels along Le Buffs Road through a residential area to
the end of the maintained right of way. At this point, the route would be creating a new
corridor through undisturbed forested land for approximately 1,000 feet to the south boundary
of Section 1, Township 50 south Range 26 east. The route then turns west and continues
through undisturbed forest for approximately one mile along the south boundary of the Forest
Glen development until it reaches the FP&L corridor. From this point south to Rattlesnake
Hammock Road, the route is the same as Alternative 1 with slightly different branches.
Similar to Alternative 1, the well sites and branch transmission mains are all adjacent to
existing property lines, using dirt roads where available to minimize environmental impacts as
Route Study Report - August 20G2.doc
August 2002
G1RIi.L.V AND HAN.IiN ""
8
I
I
I
I
I
1 0
5
~ 10<'-
well as inconvenience to landowners. Impacts to the surrounding areas due to these smaller
mains should be manageable. This pipe alignment required that more wells be located near
residential areas such as the area along Le Buffs Road and Forest Glen residential and golf
course development. Well sites with emergency generators located near residential
developments will require attention during design of generator enclosures and will need to
address sound attenuation as well as aesthetics.
Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard / CR 951
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This alternative follows the same alignment as alternative one from the SCRWTP south
to Beck Boulevard. At this point, the route heads west in the southern part of Beck Boulevard
right-of-way to County Road 951. The southern portion of the Beck Boulevard right-of-way is
surplus right-of-way made obsolete when the Interstate was extended. ,providing adequate
space for pipe alignment along this portion of the route.
Once the route reaches County Road 951, it turns southerly in the eastern side of the
right-of-way. This high traffic, heavily improved corridor is a relatively poor place to site
medium-large diameter pipeline construction. There are existing utilities within the CR 951
right-of-way including a 12-inch force main, a 48-inch water main, and a 20-inch water main.
Future plans call for construction of a 36-inch water main within the CR 951 right-of-way from
Beck Boulevard south to Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Future plans also call for the
construction of additional traffic . lanes, and therefore, additional drainage facilities. Utility
congestion along the CR 951 would complicate pipeline design and construction. The right-of
way is bounded on the east by drainage canals and residential development entranceways with
elaborate landscaping and green space is limited along the route. These improvements require
installation of the pipeline under the roadway, resulting in greater public inconvenience due to
traffic disruption and increased cost due to road reconstruction.
4. EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PIPELINE
ROUTES
4.1 Cost-Identifiable Evaluation
I
I
I
I
I
I
Each alternative route contains variable cost-identifiable features. Typically, pipeline
length is the most influential factor. Other significant factors include special installation
techniques (e.g. trencruess installation), the cost and type of property required, the amount of
environmental restoration/mitigation required and pavement/ roadway restoration.
4.1.1 Pipeline Length
The estimated lengths of the alternative routes are presented below. The cost of open
cut construction for a 30-inch diameter pipeline is estimated at $210 per linear foot. The cost of
trencruess installation of a casing pipe for a 30-inch diameter pipeline by jacking and augering is
estimated at $600 per linear foot. The long micro-tunneled crossing anticipated for crossing
Interstate 75 is $1,300 per linear foot of casing plus the cost of the carrier pipe. These costs are
derived from similar pipeline projects and current construction cost trends. The total lengths of
the alternative routes including branch lines are as follows:
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
(JR..LIIY AND HANeliN ......c
9
I
1 n ~
CJ
* tOe..
I
Overall Pipeline Lengths
I
I
Route
Alternative 1: FP&L Corridor
Alternative 2: Le Buffs Road I FP&L Corridor
Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard I CR 951
Length
34,500 ft.
39,000 ft.
38,600 ft.
I
4.1.2 Property Acquisition Considerations
I
In general, route development attempts to utilize public rights-of-way and avoid
reqwnng easements. When necessary routes utilize easements whose characteristics are
favorable for acquisition or which are required for the successful completion of the project. The
cost of easement acquisition is based upon estimates of the property value and acquisition
services fees. For typical permanent easements, a partial use factor is assigned and multiplies
times the property value accounting for the fact that some surface uses of the land will still be
allowed (such as parking lots). In cases where the taking of property does not allow the owner
future partial use, 100 percent of the unit property cost is used. Based on project experience, the
County has recommended that the cost of permanent easement be estimated using a unit cost of
$ 75,000 per acre. For an easement within the FPL&L corridor, where the land has already been
encumbered, a 50% partial use factor has been assigned. The value of temporary construction
easements is estimated as 30 percent of the unit property value multiplied by the easement area,
to allow for a three-year land rent at a value of 10 percent per year. In addition, a $15,000 per
parent parcel fee for engineering, survey and legal fees for property acquisition is assumed.
I
I
I
I
I
Easement costs used in this report are based upon a 30-foot wide permanent easement
and typically a 20-foot wide temporary construction easement. The temporary easement may
not be required if a usable right-of-way is adjacent to the permanent easement. Properties for
well sites are recommended to be acquired in fee simple.
I
I
I
The greatest easement cost for this project will likely be for easements within the FP&L
corridor for which FP&L has an easement. The fee simple land owners would lose very litde
property rights as the land is already encumbered in a similar fashion for electrical power
transmission. A mutual use agreement will be required from FP&L. If the proposed pipeline
interferes little with existing and future electrical power transmission uses, FP&L should be
amenable to the mutual use agreement and historically do not charge a fee.
I
I
Environmental and permitting concerns make it difficult to define absolutely the exact
property proposed for acquisition without a qualified environmental inspection of each site, with
potential adjustments, and subsequent meetings with regulatory agencies. Project scheduling
requirements do not allow for this to be performed before the sites are identified for this report.
4.1.3 Road Restoration
I
I
In locations where the pipe is aligned along a road and right-of-way and green space is
insufficient to construct the pipeline, a portion of the road bed may be disturbed. In instances
where the pavement is disturbed, the road base in the impacted lane is restored and the entire
road width is overlaid. These roadway restoration costs may become significant where long
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
caRaliLliv AND MAN.aN LLC
10
1
!::"
,}
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.:tf: lot
lengths of roadways are disturbed. The estimated cost of road restoration/ replacement is $70.00
per linear foot. This value is'based on similar projects and current construction cost trends.
County Road 951 and Le Buffs Road would require the most restoration associated with
the alternative routes.
It should be noted that all of the proposed pipe corridors have no parallel storm
drainage structures. Most storm drainage is accomplished with roadside ditches. The crossing
of existing storm drainage culverts will be restored if disturbed by the proposed construction,
with no change in the existing drainage patterns.
4.1.5 Permitting
The list of permits required for each of the alternative routes are similar and it is
assumed that engineering fees associated with application, preparation, and permit fees will not
significandy impact cost evaluation. The level of complexity will be high for environmental
permits associated with Alternative 2 - LeBuffs Road/FP&L Corridor and for Right-of-Way
Use Permits for the County Road 951 alternative. Although the stipulations set forth in some
permits may require cost identifiable measures, at this time, those items are not known.
Consequendy, no permitting cost associated with the construction of the alternative routes has
been identified, The following permits may be required:
. Collier County Right-of-Way Use Permit;
. Florida Department of Transportation Utility Permit;
. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Intent to Use/Department of
Health Public Drinking Water Facility Permit;
. SFWMD Water Use Permit for the wells;
. USEPA NPDES Permit for Non-Point Source (Construction);
. SFWMD /FDEP / ACOE Environmental Resource Permit; and
. Florida Power and Light Mutual Use Agreement.
4.1.6 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
Before costs could be developed, each segment of pipe had to be sized. The mainline
pipe is sized for all wells on and pumping a total of 16 MGD. The branch lines are sized
assuming a maximum flow from individual wells of 1,000 GPM. Pipeline size and hydraulics is
detailed in Appendix A. Preliminary opinions of probable cost have been prepared for the
alternative pipeline routes including property acquisition, wetland mitigation, well construction,
and a 15% contingency, and are included in Appendix B. The probable construction costs for
each route are summarized as follows:
Probable Consttuction Cost Estimates
Route
Alternative 1: FP&L Corridor
Alternative 2: Le Buffs Road / FP&L Corridor
Cost
$15,387,000
$16,700,000
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
GlR88L&V AND HAN..N ..0
11
~
1 u
o 5
I
I
I
I
I
*toc..-
Probable Construction Cost Estimates
Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard / CR 951
$16,310,000
4.2 Non-Cost-Identifiable Route Evaluation Criteria
4.2.1 Development/Weighting of Criteria
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The alternative pipeline routes were evaluated and compared based on an array of non-
cost-identifiable criteria. The non-cast-identifiable criteria consist of possible characteristics or
special requirements associated with the specific project. Although they are not evaluated with a
cost value, these criteria are of critical importance in determining the appropriate route. The
consultant team selected which criteria are applicable to the proposed pipeline. The non-cost-
identifiable criteria, developed for this evaluation are shown as follows:
I
I
I
I
I
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
G1R..LliV AND HANBIiN "LC
12
I
1
5
*(OC-
I
I
Non-Cost-Identifiable Route Evaluation Criteria
Criteria Impacts
Pipeline Length . Duration of construction; date of initial operation
. Number of pipe joints and potential latent defects
(e.g. future leaks)
. Number of appurtenances requiring O&M
. Duration of public inconvenience
Public Inconvenience . Complaints; community relations
. Business operations and profits
. Tranquility of life (e.g. noise, dust, vibration)
. Taking of private land
Safety . Accessibility for emergency vehicles
. Public and business commuting time and cost
. Availability of adequate detour routes
. Coordination between traffic agencies
Major Road Crossings . Duration of construction
. Permitting
. Future maintenance accessibility
Geotechnical Considerations . Dewatering; construction duration
. Corrosion potential
. Construction contingency cost
Permitting Requirements . Bidding schedule
. Construction scheduling and sequencing
. Agency review
. Public hearing/ notification
Right-of-Way/Easement . Administrative, surveying and engineering costs
Availability . Design and biddin~ schedules
Operation and Maintenance . O&M convenience
Accessibility
Environmental Impact/Wetlands . :Mitigation engineering and monitoring
:Mitigation . Land acquisition
. Design and bidding schedules
. Design and construction complexity
. Public relations
Long-Range Planning . Consistency with future projects
. Future utilities
. Future road/intersection enhancements
Special Construction . Duration of Construction
Requirements . Time and Cost
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
To identify which criteria are most important to pipeline route selection each were assigned
a weighting factor. TIlls was accomplished by polling several pipeline engineers for their respective
opinions of relative importance. Each of the individuals reviewed the project and familiarized
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
CilIR.."'.V AND HAN..N ~~a
13
I
II
1 i.
5
:t\O~
themselves with the project area before filling out the criteria-weighting matrix. The results of the
criteria weightings are shown..in the evaluation matrix.
I
4.2.2 Rating the Routes Against Criteria
I
Using an evaluation matrix is a convenient method of rating each route against each of
the 11 weighted non-cost-identifiable route selection criteria previously discussed. The
alternative routes were compared and each was rated against every criterion on a scale of 1
(poor) to 4 (excellent). The resulting products (criterion weight x rating) were summed to obtain
a total score for each route. The route with the highest total score represents the preferred route
based on non-cost identifiable criteria.
I
I
The Alternative Route Evaluation Matrix Scores are shown in Appendix C and are
summarized as follows:
I
Non-Cast-Identifiable
Route Selection Criteria Score
Route
Alternative 1: FP&L Corridor
Alternative 2: LeBuffs / FP&L Corridor
Alternative 3: Beck Boulevard / CR 951
Score
I
I
165 (best)
141
99 (worst)
I
5.
ROUTE RECOMMENDATION
I
5.1
Recommended Route
I
Subject to the successful negotiation of a mutual use agreement with Florida Power and
Light and subject to the assessment of environmental characteristics, mosdy associated with well
sites and branch transmission mains, and subsequent, successful discussion with regulators,
Alternative 1 is reconunended for both cost and non-cost reasons. This route is the least cosdy,
has the least traffic impacts, has the least impact to the general public, and is the shortest.
Appendix D includes detailed aerial color photographic mapping including property lines and
folio numbers.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
G1F1..L..V AND HAN..N ~~c
14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
5
:tt {OL
APPENDIX A
Pipe Sizing and Hydraulics
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
G1....L..v ANQ HAN..N ""
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
5
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNNfENT
SCR WTP Reverse Osmosis Well field Expansion
Alternative: 1 - FP&L Corridor
if tot
Pipeline Sizing and Hydraulics
Greeley and Hansen
July 2002
Pipe Length Nom. Pipe Inside Pipe Average Flow Average
Pipe Label (feet) Diameter Diameter (gpm) Velocity (fps)
(inches) (inches)
P-1 4,100 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-1A 600 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-1A 80 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-2 1,750 . 30 29.28 10,633 5.1
P-3 2,050 30 29.28 10,150 4.8
P-3A 100 30 29.28 10,150 4.8
P-4 1,600 24 23.61 9,667 7.1
P-5 1,250 24 23.61 9,183 6.7
P-6 1,400 24 23.61 8,700 6.4
P-7 1,350 12 11.65 967 2.9
P-8 1,300 8 7.98 483 3.1
P-9 1,200 8 7.98 483 3.1
P-10 1,300 24 23.61 7,250 5.3
P-11 1,400 20 19.76 6,283 6.6
P-12 1,200 16 15.92 1,450 2.3
P-13 1 ,450 12 11.65 967 2.9
P-14 1,350 20 19.76 4,350 4.6
P-15 1,350 8 7.98 483 3.1
P-16 1,400 16 15.92 3,867 6.2
P-17 1,350 8 7.98 483 3.1
P-18 1,200 8 7.98 483 3.1
P-19 1,500 16 15.92 2,900 4.7
P-20 1,200 8 7.98 483 3.1
P-21 1,200 16 15.92 1.933 3.1
P-22 1,300 12 11.65 967 2.9
P-23 1,300 8 7.98 483 3.1
TOTAL
34,500
ft.
PIPE MATERIAL
8" - 12" C900 PVC CLASS 150
16" - 30" C905 PVC CLASS 165
NOTE
Average flow shown is with all 23 wells pumping
a total of 16 MGD. Branch lines are sized
assuming 1000 GPM max. per well.
PI PE_ Costs. xis
8/6/2002
Pipe Length Nom. Pipe Inside Pipe Average Average
Pipe Label (feet) Diameter Diameter Flow (gpm) Velocity
(inches) (inches) (fps)
P-1 9,500 30 29.28 11.117 5.3
P-1A 500 30 29.2B 11,117 5.3
P-1A BO 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-2 1,300 30 29.28 10,649 5.1
P-3 1,300 30 29.28 10,186 4.9
P-4 1,300 24 23.61 9,723 7.1
P-5 1 ,400 24 23.61 9,260 6.8
P-6 1,800 . 24 23.61 8,797 6.4
P-7 1,350 24 23.61 8,334 6.1
P-8 1,250 24 23.61 7,871 5.8
P-9 1 ,400 24 23.61 7,408 5.4
P-10 1,300 24 23.61 6,945 5.1
P-11 1,200 8 7.98 463 3.0
P-12 1 ,400 20 19.76 6,019 6.3
P-13 1,200 12 11.65 1,389 4.2
P-14 1,450 12 11.65 926 2.8
P-15 1,350 16 15.92 4,167 6.7
P-16 1,350 8 7.98 463 3.0
P-17 1,400 16 15.92 3,704 6.0
P-18 1,350 8 7.98 463 3.0
P-19 1,200 8 7.98 463 3.0
P-20 1,500 16 15.92 2,778 4.5
P-21 1,200 8 7.98 463 3.0
P-22 1,200 16 15.92 1,852 3.0
P-23 1,300 8 7.98 463 3.0
Ii'
I
Ii
I,
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
'.
I
1
5
:t tOL
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERN11ENT
SCRWTP Reverse Osmosis Well field Expansion
Alternative: 2 - Le Buffs RoadIFP&L Corridor
Pipeline Sizing and Hydraulics
Greeley and Hansen
July 2002
TOTAL
39,000
ft.
PIPE MATERIAL
8" - 12" C900 PVC CLASS 150
16" - 30" C90S PVC CLASS 165
NOTE
Average flow shown is with all 23 wells pumping
a total of 16 MGD. Branch lines are sized
assuming 1000 GPM max. per well.
PIPE_Costs.xls
8/6/2002
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
5
::(!:p<:.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
SCR WTP Reverse Osmosis Wellfield Expansion
Alternative: 3 - County Road 951
Pipeline Sizing and Hydraulics
Greeley and Hansen
July 2002
Pipe Length Nom. Pipe Inside Pipe Average Flow Average
Pipe Label Diameter Diameter
(feet) (gpm) Velocity (fps)
(inches) (inches)
P-1 4,100 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-1A 600 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-1A 80 30 29.28 11,117 5.3
P-2 2,000 30 29.28 10,649 5.1
P-3 4,500 30 29.28 10,186 4.9
P-3A 100 30 29.28 10,186 4.9
P-4 1-,300 16 15.92 2,315 3.7
P-5 1,300 24 23.61 7,871 5.8
P-6 1,300 24 23.61 1,852 1.4
P-7 1,400 24 23.61 7,408 5.4
P-8 1,400 8 7.98 1,389 8.9
P-9 1,350 8 7.98 926 5.9
P-10 1,300 8 7.98 463 3.0
P-11 1,300 24 23.61 6,482 4.8
P-12 1,200 16 15.92 1,852 3.0
P-13 1 ,400 20 19.76 4,630 4.8
P-14 1 ,400 16 15.92 1,389 2.2
P-15 1,200 12 11.65 926 2.8
P-16 1 ,450 8 7.98 463 3.0
P-17 1,350 20 19.76 4,167 4.4
P-18 1 ,400 16 15.92 3.704 6.0
P-19 1,350 12 11.65 926 2.8
P-20 1 ,400 8 7.98 463 3.0
P-21 1,500 16 15.92 2,315 3.7
P-22 1,200 16 15.92 1,852 3.0
P-23 1,200 16 15.92 1,389 2.2
P-24 1,300 8 7.98 463 3.0
TOTAL
38,600 ft.
..~-
PIPE MATERIAL
8" - 12"
16" - 30"
NOTE
Average flow shown is with all 23 wells pumping
a total of 16 MGD. Branch lines are sized
assuming 1000 GPM max. per well.
C900 PVC CLASS 150
C905 PVC CLASS 165
8/6/2002
PIPE_Costs. xis
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rl
* to c...
APPENDIX B
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
caRlillLIIV ANCl HAN.IIN ~"..
I:
II
I,i
I'
I:
I~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
~.
".,
Collier County Government
* tOe..
Sout~ County Regional Water Treatment Plant
Reverse Osmosis Well Field Expansion
Cost Estimate
Alternative 1 - FP&L Corridor
Greeley and Hansen LLC
August 2002
Item Description Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost
1 Raw Water Pipelines in Open-cut Trench
Furnish & Install 30" Water Line and Fittings $ 210 LF 7,900 $ 1,659,000
Furnish & Install 24" Water Une and Fittings $ 160 LF 5,550 $ B88,000
Furnish & Install 20" Water Line and Fittings $ 120 LF 2,750 $ 330,000
Furnish & Install 16" Water Line and Fittings $ 80 LF 5,300 $ 424,000
Furnish & Install 12" Water Line and Fittings $ 52 LF 4,100 $ 213,000
Furnish & Install 8" Water Une and Fittings $ 36 LF 8,900 $ 320,000
Total Pipe Length 34,500
2 Trenchless Construction of Raw Water Pipelines
Jacked and Augered 30" Water Main $ 600 EA 180 $ . 108,000
Mlcrotunneled 30" Water Main $ 1,300 EA 600 $ 780,000
3 PavementlRight-of-Way Restoration
Rebuild Lane and Overlay Road $ 70 LF 100 $ 7,000
Finish Grade by Seeding $ 1.25 SY 10,000 $ 13,000
FInish Grade by Sodding $ 4 SY 5,000 $ 20,000
4 Wells $ 250,000 EA 23 $ 5,750,000
5 Wetland Mitigation/Restoration
Forested $ BO,OOO AC 1.82 $ 145,500
Herbaceous $ 10,000 AC 0.91 $ 9,100
Subtotal (Construction Cost) $10,666,600
-
6 Property Acquisition
Parent Parcels with takings (Admin.) $ 15,000 EA 62 $ 930,000
Perm.t Easement Area in FPL Corridor $ 37,500 AC 13.2 $ 493,300
Temp. Easement Area In FPL Corridor $ 22,500 AC 8.8 $ 197,300
Permanent Easements $ 75,000 AC 10.6 $ 795,500
Temporary Easements $ 22,500 AC 7.1 $ 159,100
Well Sites Fee Simple $ 75.000 AC 1.3 $ 95,000
Well Sites Temporary Easements $ 22,500 AC 1.9 $ 42,800
Subtotal (Property AcquiSition) $ 2,713,000
7 Construction Contingency (to nearest $1000) 15 % $ 2,007,000
Total (to nearest $1000) $15,387,000
i .
Ii
,
II
I:
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E\
Collier County Government
* fO c...
South County Regional Water Treatment Plant
Reverse Osmosis Well Field Expansion
Cost Estimate
Alternative 2 - Le Buffs Road/FP&L Corridor
Greeley and Hansen LLC
August 2002
Item Description Unit Price Unit Quantity Cost
1 Raw Water Pipelines in Open-cut Trench
Furnish & Install 30" Water Une and Fittings $ 210 LF 12,100 $ 2,541,000
Furnish & Install 24" Water Une and Fittings $ 160 LF 9,800 $ 1,568,000
Furnish & Install 20" Water Une and Fittings $ 120 LF 1,400 $ 168,000
Furnish & Install 16" Water Une and Fittings $ 80 LF 5,450 $ 436,000
Furnish & Install 12" Water Line and Fittings $ 52 LF 2,650 $ 138,000
Furnish & Install 8" Water Line and Fittings $ 36 LF 7,600 $ 274,000
Total Pipe Length 39,000
2 Trenchless Construction of Raw Water Pipelines
Jacked and Augered 30" Water Main $ 600 EA 80 $ 48;000
Microtunneled 30" Water Main $ 1,300 EA 500 $ 650,000
3 PavementJRight-of-Way Restoration
Rebuild Lane and Overlay Road $ 70 LF 3,500 $ 245,000
Finish Grade by Seeding $ 1.25 SY 15,000 $ 19,000
Finish Grade by Sodding $ 4 SY 8,000 $ 32,000
4 Wells $ 250,000 EA 23 $ 5,750,000
5 Wetland Mitigation/Restoration
Forested $ 80,000 AC 4.25 $ 340,300
Herbaceous $ 10,000 AC 2.12 $ 21,200
Subtotal (Construction Cost) $ 12,230,500
6 Property Acquisition
Parent Parcels with takings (Admin.) $ 15,000 EA 51 $ 765,000
Perm.t Easement Area in FPL Corridor $ 37,500 AC 7.4 $ 278,900
Temp. Easement Area in FPl Corridor $ 22,500 AC 5.0 $ 111,600
Permanent Easements $ 75,000 AC 11.1 $ 831,600
Temporary Easements $ 22,500 AC 7.4 $ 166,400
Well Sites Fee Simple $ 75,000 AC 1.3 $ 95,000
Well Sites Temporary Easements $ 22,500 AC 1.9 $ 42,800
Subtotal (Property Acquisition) $ 2,291,300
7 Construction Contingency (to nearest $1000) 15 % $ 2,178,000
Total (to nearest $1000) $ 16,700,000
Ii
II
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
b
Collier County Government
"* {Oe..
South .~ounty Regional Water Treatment Plant
Reverse Osmosis Well Field Expansion
Cost Estimate
Alternative 3 - County Road 951
Greeley and Hansen LLC
August 2002
Item Description Unit Price Unit Quantity I Cost
1 Raw Water Pipelines in Open-cut Trench
Furnish & Install 30" Water Line and Fittings $ 210 LF 10,600 $ 2,226,000
Furnish & Install 24" Water Line and Fittings $ 160 LF 5,300 $ 848,000
Furnish & Install 20" Water Line and Fittings $ 120 LF 2,750 $ 330,000
Furnish & Install 16" Water Line and Fittings $ 80 LF 9,200 $ 736,000
Furnish & Install 12" Water Line and Fittings $ 52 LF 2,550 $ 133,000
Furnish & Install 8" Water Une and Fittings $ 36 LF 8,200 $ 295,000
Total Pipe Length 38,600
2 Trenchless Construction of Raw Water Pipelines
Jacked and Augered 30" Water Main $ 600 EA 180 $ 108,000
Microtunneled 30" Water Main $ 1,300 EA 600 $ 780,000
3 PavernentJRight-of-Way Restoration
Rebuild Lane and Overlay Road $ 70 LF 15,840 $ 1,109,000
Finish Grade by Seeding $ 1.25 SY 7,500 $ 9,000
Finish Grade by Sodding $ 4 SY 5,000 $ 20,000
4 Wells $ 250,000 EA 23 $ 5,750,000
5 Wetland Mitigation/Restoration
Forested $ 80,000 AC 0.90 $ 72.000
_ Herbaceous $ 10,000 AC 0.45 $ 4,500
Subtotal (Construction Cost) $12,420,500
6 Property Acquisition
Parent Parcels with takings (Admin.) $ 15,000 EA 34 $ 510,000
Perm.t Easement Area in FPL Corridor $ 37,500 AC 5.6 $ 211,800
Temp. Easement Area in FPL Corridor $ 22,500 AC 3.8 $ 84,800
Permanent Easements $ 75,000 AC 9.1 $ 681,800
Temporary Easements $ 22,500 AC 6.1 $ 136,400
Well Sites Fee Simple $ 75,000 AC 1.3 $ 95,000
Well Sites Temporary Easements $ 22,500 AC 1.9 $ 42,800
Subtotal (Property Acquisition) $ 1,762,600
7 Construction Contingency (to nearest $1000) 15 % $ 2,127,000
Total (to nearest $1000) $16,310,000
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 5
::tf: (0 c...
APPENDIX C
Alternative Route Evaluation Matrix
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
caR..LIIY AND HAN..N ~LC
Ii
Ii
I:
I:
I:
I:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,0
I
f-
Z c
LU 0
::E '(j)
LU c
Z ca
0:: ~
LUW
>32
o Q)
C>~
~ Q)
Z3=
::>0
00::
Uo..
o::~
LUo::
::JU
0U)
U
z
o
~
~
<
;:l
~
>-
~
~
~ ~
O~
~ =
~ ~
~ ~
~ :::I
e= ~
~
~
~
<
~
~
~
~
-
UJ
~ 00::
5)u:;~8
"30>Q)U)
SO::'S
..x:uo.
() 0:: ~
Q) Z
en ~
-.... UJ
-g.goo::
o .;:: 3: 0
O::....f-U
o Q) CfJ
~u_
~ -J ~
en oC:S 0
0..0::
.3LL
M
o
o
M
......
en
::l
b.O
::l
-<
....
o
"0
.;::
....
o
U
-J
oC:S
a..
LL
.
.
~l'-~~CON~"=tCONC")
N..-NC'\IC'")NM..-..-N..-
..
.
o ..- 0 "=t _ ,..., ex) co N ...... __
,... C'\I C'") C'\I '" ''',... ..-" · ""J
.
:::.::::
~NC'")C'").qoNNC'\INNC'")C'")
UJ
(1.)0::
cO
OU
(l.)CfJ
-
~
o
0::
.
.
~~g~.qoN~~~M~
.
:::.::::
~.qo.qoC'")MC'\INC'\IMC'")M.qo
f-O::
::co
C)1-l()l'-~COC'\l"-O>"=tCO"-C'")
UJU
3=~
-<
0::
UJ
I-
0::
U
Z (I.)
o ()
~ ~
::> -c '2
-J C, ~
<(> c c
(I.) 0
W -J ()
Q) c
.5: ()
~:o
.- ~
a.. a..
en
c
o
+=
ca
en ....
C)~
.5: '(j)
en c
en 0
eu
Un;
"0 ()
ca '2
O.c:
0:: ()
Z' .... Q)
~ .Q. (5
co ca Q)
cn:!:C!l
Z' .9
.- -
= ca
.c C)
~ '(jj :2
= ~:!: $
.- () c
.c () en Q)
.~ -< -g E
'" (I.) CO (I.)
~i~~ 'I
Q) E2 () ~o::
E Q) C ca .- C
~ en 'cu C. C 0
.::; ca >0::: E C +=
.... ...::;-a:lca
C'" W "'C - a.. 0
Ql>,cJ!! -
0:: <<l a:I C Q) en
C) 3= c: Q) 0'> Q)
.5 ..,!. .Q E ~ 0::
~9caeo::n;
E 1: Ci) '> ~'g
Q) ,!2l c. c 0 c.
a..O::OUJ-JCfJ
"-NM~l()cri~coaici..-
..- ..-
-
-
en
0> ...
O>~
..-
.qo
..-
-
l()c;;
CD Q)
~en
-
UJ
0::
o
U
CfJ
-J
~
o
I-
/:"
\J
#- tD C.
-
en
Q)
..c
Q)
-c
-
C)
c
'w
..c
"=t
.c:
-
'3
.qo ...
0.9
- ()
..- CO
_LL
0-
Q).g,
~~
.;.: x
c..x:
ca c
cr:~
~ II
~ ~
Q) 0
~~
. t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~"\
4-l0 c..
APPENDIX D
Detailed Map of Recommended Route
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
caRII.LIIV AND HANBIiN LLC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
II
I
il
I
II
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
Route Study Report - August 2002.doc
August 2002
CilRIiIlLIIV AND HAN.IIN LLC
FIGURES
~
...}
=if:. I () L
~-~
I FIGURE 1 -*rJ(:
-"----"
I 25
I
I 33 36
I
I 3
I
I
I
I 17 15 Q:: 18
<.3
I
I
I
I 30
I w
I
J:
<-'
en 36
... 35 31 (
I cO
N
0 AREA OF APPARENT ADVANTAGEOUS
~
I .....
0 HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
-
-
(;
;;: COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILlTlES
I ~
u SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL W.T.P.
u
w WELL FIELD STUDY
....J GREELEY AND HANSEN LLC AUGUST 2002
;;:
I
it:'
I ,J
FIGURE 2 :(lfOC
~
I 25
I
I 33 36
I (C.R. 856)
I 3 2
I
I
I
Ii}
I 01
17 15 a::: 18
u
I
I
I
I 30
I w
I
J:
<.:>
0
I 'OJ- 35 36 31 (
u;
N
0
~ ROUTE STUDY AREA
I ,...
0
-
-
<:;
I G: COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES
~
u SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL W. T.P.
u
w WELL FIELD STUDY
...; GREELEY AND HANSEN .....c AUGUST 2002
G:
I
I
,
"*lOC-
'.-."
'r..J'
:U:-( DC-
~HoC.
if
*-loC.
SHEEl'4QF'4
~ ,
<v<~
':J~ 'c
....---.. .;
~
~,
""
.
.... ...-.
l.lJ"D.l- II I III I III I III I III I II II I I r I I I I I I
~ _____ SOUTH COUNTY
l:""" REGIONAL WATER
-', TREATMENT PLANT
F==
L / iROPOSED WELL
COLLECTION MAIN
-d ~
~--
~ ~~
~ ---:5 ~ ~KE BLVD,
Dl 1____
III ~
I II II I II l::::=-
I.: BECK BLVD, r- ~=
[T\ 1=
z-
Cl "'1- 1=
PROPOSED TEST c: ;;;=
- .., [:::
~J .~l WELL AND PRODUCnO N VI 5- ~
WELL SITE (TYP) :>J
~ -
-
J r!
:>J i
~ 0
,.
0
I-- -
~
-
~ "'1 - 1
"0
R-
r- c:::J
~
~ - I-- I--
n ~
io
:>J .;.t
<0
~
PRO OS ED
PRO UCTION
WEL SITE (TYP
~
~ 1
~ - --
-
~
I
~
d / I
.....1: ,I
.J >rLESNAK 1-
MMMOC I
0 ,
)>
!:j
fT1
:::0
Z
~
<::
fT1
.,.,
\J
P:>
r
()
o
:::0
:::0
o
o
:::0
GlR..L.V AND HAN..N ....0
t
SCALE: 1 ".1600'
SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER
TREATMENT PLANT
WELL SITE AND WELL COLLECTION
MAIN ROUTE STUDY AUGUST 2002
~~-\
4(0 C.
""
"
c:
:>J
[T\
c...
I " I
l.l.I.C>1- 1111111111111111111111111'
~l ~ SOUTH COUNTY
~~ REGIONAL WATER
_ ' " TREATMENT PLANT
:=L
~
5
II
)>
I
-i
fT1
:::0
Z
~
<::
fT1
N
-
L.--
~;ROPOSED WELL
/ COLLECTION MAIN
~((l'r-Il
"'----c;
iI
-
~ PROPOSED
Q
~
-
WELL SITE (T P
--
~
'IV7: .-d
---!.RST/i7: -r ~
I -!!S ~ i...IWlTE LAKE Bl
J r ---- ---'f- VD.
:: :: I 11 I -----r--b- I
~ROPos::CK BLVD. ~
TEST WELL :;J
SITE Vl
:>J
;t
I I 1,
?"r I '1 .-fl
lk- ~
I~~ t~
~\]J I
~ ~ ~
I
fT1
rn
C
,.,
,.,
(j)
:::0
o
)>
o
"'-
,.,
\J
P:-
I
()
o
:::0
:::0
o
o
:::0
~
~t.l
J
=Jl
r
r-'j
n
io
<0
'"
=:
tru:sNAKE
FfAMMOCI\ W
o
:>JF\
I \-. PROPOSED TEST
WELL AND PRODUCTION
WELL SITE (TYP)
i ~ \.
1
I I
.~~ 1 I
I ,
QR..L.V AND HAN..N ,'0
f?J
~
I-- -
fiii _
~=-
~==
p==
0-=
:>J
~
o
-
I--
~
~
I--L-
IT-
I
t
SCALE: '".1600'
1
SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER
TREATMENT PLANT
WELL SITE AND WELL COLLECTION
MAIN ROUTE STUDY AUGUST 2002
r:.
:#l~
""
"
C
:>J
[T\
~
)>
!:j
fT1
:::0
Z
~
<
(Tl
0J
l.l.I.C>1- II I 111111111111111 I II II1I r I I I I I I
~ _____ SOUTH COUNTY
l:""" REGIONAL WATER
_ TREATMENT PLANT
1== ::- '
/PROPOSED WELL
'-- COLLECTION MAIN
-d
~ J I T ~---.;
~~
~ J
--!..!S ~ ~ lAKE BLVD,
M II H I ~
II If I -----r-:
l I I II I II I::::=-
---- BECK BLVD, r- ~l::: ~
r 1\ [T\
Cl ~l::: 1=
PROPOSED TEST c: r;;[::: 1=
- ..,
~J WELL i\ND PRODUCTION "'1 5- e:::
~j Vl
WELL SITE (TYP) :>J
<= -
-
I J
') ) , :>J
0
./'-.. ,.
0
) ~ ~ I--- -
~ I---
Q I
I--- I
~ , -
~ u 1
"'1 -
"0
~
r- c:::J I
~
Q - '- ~
(") ~ i
io 1
:>J =:T
<0
~
PRO OSED
PRO UCTION
WEll SITE (TYP
~ I
~ I"! I
= ~ i I
Ii
~ I
I--- _l.-
i--
-I
/],--0" I
~ -1
I
I ITLESNAKE I 1-
RAMMOCK" 'I<V"'"
0
rn
fT1
()
^
CD
<
o
"'-
()
:::0
<D
U1
....
t
SCALE: '".1600'
QR..L.V AND HAN..N ....0
SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER
TREATMENIT PLANT
WELL SITE AND WELL COLLECTION
MAIN ROUTE STUDY i\UGUST 2002
-:tt~
::J
(')
c:
:>J
M
<Jl
Agenda Item No. 100
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve a budget amendment for $2,000,000 to pay the Agency for
Health Care Administration for the County's share of Medicaid Billing for fiscal years
2000 through 2005.
OBJECTIVE: Authorize the Chairman to approve a budget amendment of $2,000,000
to pay for county's Medicaid share for FY 00 through FY 05.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Pursuant to Chapter 409.915(1)(a), Florida Statutes, each county is responsible for 35%
of the total cost of providing in-patient hospital services to eligible Medicaid recipients in
excess of 10 days, not to exceed 45 days per state fiscal year (July I through June 30).
The State of Florida establishes the Medicaid per diem amount for each hospital on
January I and July I of each year. The State pays for days one (l) through (10). The
(11th) thru the (45th) days of hospitalization payment for each eligible Collier County
resident is divided between the Federal Government and the County. The Federal
Government is assessed (65%) and the County is assessed (35%).
Hospitals are reimbursed according to per diem rates set by the Agency for Health Care
Administration (AHCA). As invoices are received from AHCA, Human Services staff
compares the per diem rate on the invoice with the rate that AHCA publishes. If the rate
on the invoice is incorrect, staff requests backup documentation from AHCA stating the
correct per diem. The Human Services Department's procedure for processing these
payments has been to reject any charges, which reflect an incorrect per diem rate. The
Human Services Department then pays appropriate charges on the invoice and sends the
rejected charges back to AHCA requesting the correct per diem rate before payment
would be processed.
Until FY 00, AHCA would provide an amended invoice supplied by the Bureau of Cost
Reimbursement, AHCA's department which sets the per diem rates. Once the correct
source documentation was provided, the Human Services Department was able to make
payment according to the invoice. However, this is no longer the case, as AHCA has
stopped supplying the rate adjustment documentation. Our policy was not to pay any
charges until such documentation was received to verifY the correct per diem.
During this time period; however, rejected charges have added up to $1,830,611 ,75 and
has resulted in correspondence from the AHCA requesting Collier County to pay the total
amount by May 8, 2005. The additional funds requested in excess of the amount above
are to pay for the remainder of FY 05.
-"
In discussions with the Agency for Health Care Administration staff, AHCA has agreed
to provide the necessary documentation in order to process these mandated payments
Agenda Item No. 100
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 4
according to statute. During the time period noted, the Human Services Department has
had unspent funds according to the following:
Fiscal Year Amended Bud2et Actual Expenses Variance
2000 $775,000 $829,342 $(54,342)
2001 $750,000 $737,763 $12,237
2002 $918,000 $622,192 $295,808
2003 $900,000 $571,417 $328,583
2004 $900,000 $586,537 $313,463
Total $4,243,000 $3,347,251 $895,749
FISCAL IMP ACT: The fiscal impact is $2,000,000 to be paid from general fund
reserves.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: There is no direct impact on the Growth
Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve a budget
amendment of $2,000,000 to pay for the county's share for Medicaid Hospital billing.
,-'
Prepared by: Barry Williams, Director, Human Services Department
-'"
Agenda Item No, 10D
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Meeting Date
100
Recommendation to approve a budget amendment for $2,000,000 to pay the Agency for
Health Care Administration for the county's share of Medicaid Billing for a period of FY 00
through FY 05, (Marla Ramsey, Administrator, Public Services)
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Item Number
Item Summary
Prepared By
Date
Barry Williams
Human Services Director
4/28/200511;06:59 AM
Public Services
Human Services
Approved By
Barry Williams
Human Services Director
Date
Public Services
Human Services
4128/2005 4: 33 PM
Approved By
Barry Williams
Human Services Director
Date
Public Services
Human Services
4/28/20054:34 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4129/2005 T:55 AM
Approved By
Gary A. Vincent
Management & Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/3120058:51 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/3/2005 1 :25 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
513/2005 5:40 PM
~
F\.ORIl6.!>OOO f'()R HfAllli.ORE.Aa.tN1STRA11ON
Agenda Item No. 10D
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 4
JEB BUSH, GOVERNOR
ALAN LEVINE. SECRETARY
April 11, 2005
Barry Williams
Collier County Human Services Department
Building H Room 211
3301 Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
RE: Unpaid Medicaid County Billing Charges
Dear Mr. Williams:
Pursuant to Section 409.915, Florida Statutes, each county is required to pay their share of the
Medicaid costs of providing care and services to county residents within 60 days of billing.
Collier County has not paid the charges on the attached list, which are past due. The reason for
nonpayment is based on the per diem rate. This is not a valid reason for withholding payment.
All charges have been re-billed at least once, however the county continues to deny payment.
Staff have provided you with information on how the rates are set and how they are updated.
Additionally, they have provided you with the actual rates for the periOdS that you asked. You
were also provided with the telephone number of the Medicaid Cost Reimbursement Section
that is responsible for setting and posting the rates.
If payment is not made by May 8, 2005, in accordance with Section 409.915(5), Florida
S~tutes, we will be referring the unpaid charges as of April 8, 2005 totaling $1,830,611.75 to
the Department of Banking and Finance and requesting that they withhold cigarette tax receipts
and any other funds to be distributed to Collier County. While routine monthly re-billings will
continue to your county, we will not re-bill invoices RB0502 and RB0503.
If you have any questions, please contact Heather Johnson at (850) 922-8407 or Duane Ashe at
(850) 414-7415.
Sincerely,
~A.-~
:.Janet Parramore
Chief, Finance and Accounting
Enclosures
2727 Mahan Drive. Mail Stop #14
Tallahassee, FL 32308
.
Visit AHCA online at
ahca. myflorida. com
Agenda Item No, 16A 1
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of "Grand Lely Drive, Phase
Two", approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and
approval of the amount of the performance security
OBJECTIVE:
To approve for recording the final plat of "Grand Lely Drive, Phase Two", a subdivision of lands
located in Section 21, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, following the
alternative procedure for approval of subdivision plats pursuant to Resolution 99-199.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the construction drawings,
specifications, and final plat of "Grand Lely Drive, Phase Two". These documents are in
compliance with the County Land Development Code and Florida State Statute No. 177. All
fees have been paid. Security in the amount of 10% of the total cost of the required
improvements, and 100% of the cost of any remaining improvements, together with a
Construction and Maintenance Agreement for Subdivision Improvements, shall be provided and
accepted by the Engineering Services Director and the County Attorney's office prior to the
recording of the final plat. This would be in conformance with the County Land Development
Code -- Section 10.02.04.
Engineering Services Department recommends that the final plat of "Grand Lely Drive, Phase
Two" be approved for recording.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project cost is $1,745,064.00 (estimated) to be borne by the
developer.
The cost breakdown is as follows:
a)
b)
Water & Sewer
Drainage,
Paving, Grading
- $ 383,578.67
- $1,361,485.33
The Security amount, equal to 110% of the
project cost, is $1,919,570.40
The County will realize revenues as follows:
,-
Fund: Community Development Fund 131
Agency: County Manager
Cost Center: 138327 -- Engineering Project Review
Revenue generated by this project:
Total: $53,391.92
Agenda Item No, 16A 1
May 10, 2005
Fees are based on a construction estimate of $1,745,064.00 and were paRPm 2 of 4
September, 2004.
The breakdown is as follows:
a) Plat Review Fee ($1,000.00 + $5./ac) -$ 1,040.00
b) Construction Drawing Review Fee
Water &
Sewer (.75% const. est.) - $ 2,876.84
c) Drainage,
Paving, Grading (.75% const. est.) - $10,211.14
d) Construction Inspection Fee
Water &
Sewer (2.25% const. est.) - $ 8,630.52
e) Drainage, Paving,
Grading(2.25%const.est.) - $30,633.42
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
The developer must receive a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities prior to the issuance of
the construction plan final approval letter.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
There are no outstanding environmental issues.
HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
There are no historical or archaeological impacts. If during the course of site clearing,
excavation or other construction activity, a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all
development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be
immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted.
lEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the plat and associated legal
documents.
RECOMMENDA TION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Final Plat of "Grand Lely Drive, Phase
Two" for recording with the following stipulations:
1. Approve the amount of $1,919,570.40 as performance security for the required
improvements; or such lesser amount based on work completed, and as is approved by the
Engineering Services Department.
2. Approve the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement, and
a. That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the required improvements have
received preliminary acceptance.
b. That the plat not be recorded until suitable security and an appropriate Construction
and Maintenance Agreement is approved and accepted by the Engineering Services
Department Director and the County Attorney's office.
""'..
PREPARED BY: John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Department
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No, 16A 1
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16A1
Recommendation to approve for recording Ihe final plat of "Grand Lely Onve, Phase Two.,
appro....al of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of
the amount of the performance secunty
5/10120059:0000 AM
Prepared By
Senior Engineer
4/14/Z005 1:37:51 PM
John Houldsworth
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Date
Engineering SeNices
COES Engineering Services Director
Date
Approved By
Thomas E. Kuck, P .E.
Community Development &
Environmental Services
CDES Engineering Services.
4118120058:58 AM
Approved By
Dale
Sandra Lea
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Executive Secretary
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4/18120051:58 PM
Constance A. Johnson
Date
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4119/20053:59 PM
Dute
Approved By
Joseph K. Schrnitt
Community Development &
Environmental Senrices
Community Development &
Environmental Services. Adminstrator
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4/25/20053:09 PM
OMS Coordinator
Administrati've Assistant
Dcate
Approved By
County Manuger's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4126/Z005 9:09 AM
Approved By
Mark Isacks-on
County Manager's Office
Budget Analyst
Dcale
Office of Management & Budget
41Z91Z005 10:39 AM
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/200511:53 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of CDunty
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/29/2005 5:30 PM
!
,
......GL... I -.-
- ~
~
;1j III III h- ~
:! e!
~i
:tlh flllt III I~~
>- I
II! ill Q..
<(
I ~D .. :E:
D u~ Z
II
0
-
~
III U
0
....J
I
~ it
Agenda Item No. 16A2
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and
drainage improvements for the final plat of "Terracina at the Vineyards"
The roadway and drainage improvements will be privately maintained
OBJECTIVE:
To grant final approval of the infrastructure improvements associated with that
subdivision known as "Terracina at the Vineyards"
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. On July 14, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners granted
preliminary acceptance of the roadway and drainage improvements in
"Terracina at the Vineyards".
2. The roadway and drainage improvements will be maintained by the
project's homeowners association.
/........"-
3.
The required improvements have been constructed in accordance with the
Land Development Code. The Engineering Services Department has
inspected the improvements and is recommending final acceptance of the
improvements.
4. A resolution for final acceptance has been prepared and approved by the
County Attorney's Office. A copy of the document is attached.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The roadway and drainage improvements will be maintained by the project's
homeowners association.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the Resolution.
~.
Agenda Item No. 16A2
May 10,2005
Page 2 of 5
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of County Commissioners grant final acceptance of the roadway
and drainage improvements in "Terracina at the Vineyards" and release the
maintenance security.
1. Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached resolution authorizing
final acceptance.
2. Authorize the release of the maintenance security.
PREPARED BY: John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review
Department
,-
r-'"
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No, 16A2
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 5
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
15A2
Recommendation to grail! final approval of the roadway (private) and drainage
improvements for the final pial of "Terracina at the Vineyards" The roadway and drainage
Improvell1ents will be privately maintained
5/10/20059:0000/',M
Prepared By
Senior Engineer
4/18/20058:51:07 AM
John Houldsworth
Community Development &
Envlfonrnental Services
Date
Engineering Services
Thomas E. Kuck, P.E.
COES Engineering: Services Director
Date
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
COES Engineering Services
4118/2005 8:59 AM
Sandra Lea
Date
A pproved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Executive Secretary
Community Development &
Enviromnentl.ll Services Admin.
4118120051:48 PM
Constance A. Johnson
Date
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4/19120054:02 PM
Date
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services Adminstr.ator
COl1lmunity Developmont &
Environmental Services Admin.
4125/20053:10 PM
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4126/20059:09 AM
Mark Isacks.on
Budget Analyst
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/291200510:49 AM
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/291200511:55 AM
James. V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Approved By
Board of COlmty
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
41301200512:43 PM
c-
N I.{) l{) Z
<(O_ w 0
COOO I- !;;:
'-~"<t ~ C/) () "' ~ N
~ ...
c:i 0 QJ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ <')
--' ~
Z'- en ~ OW'W3lnOB NV:>o. ~ W ~
CO O~^]'noe N't':xll W
E ~a. . " >
~ z "
~:2: 0 g
u
~
CO
"0
c:
<l)
OJ
<(
~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~
~8 5 ~ .~ IlL
i ~
.
~
~~
~o
~
~~
Bryo AItlNnO:l If
.illXl SOOOM ss~
'"
~
~i ~
~-
~
::J:;;
::a~
~
~
~
5~
N ~!::
~ 0 ~
~
~ ~
f~ ~~
~~ <(
:: ie
;e
~
i
i
~
~~
>~
~-
)'V:)S OJ. LON / ~
-
,..=
~ ~
E~ ~ ~
o . !? ~ i ~Id ~
~ i1 f d ~ o.
z~
~> z> ~~ ~ w ~.
g 9 Ii ~ ~
8
! z (3
w
. ~ . 0 0
;1~~ Ul ;1~;1; --'
i 0
~ ~~i ~ - ~a. I ~ ON
gu> oi gu>
~ Ii
OYW^,""" """" 0
~lB 'NWIRIW VJPMI
~~
i~<<J
~
::1::::
~~i
0'
g
~n
~~~
o
9
8
/;.
~~
~~
a.
~~
;t. t..
" o~
~~
!ill - ;U"JJRBJ.N
~
~
>
~
~
~
~
"""" NlWlONWl
~~
~:
0-
<(
~
I.LJ
~
en
U)
i
oct
>
!t!
>
!t!
l-
I-
oct
~
V
oct
~
ILl
I-
Q..
<(
~
z
o
~
u
o
-I
Agenda Item No. 16A2
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 5
RESOLUTION NO. 05-_
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE
OF THOSE ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS IN TERRACINA A T THE
VINEY ARDS, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE
SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT
REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE
TERRACINA AT THE VINEY ARDS
HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIA nON
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on
April 7, 1998 approved the plat of Terracina at the Vineyards for recording; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway and
drainage improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications as
required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as
amended); and
WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway and
drainage improvements and release of his maintenance security; and
WHEREAS, the Engineering Services Section of the Development Services
Department has inspected the roadway and drainage improvements, and is recommending
acceptance of said facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is
hereby granted for those roadway and drainage improvements in Terracina at the
Vineyards and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the
future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway and drainage improvements
that are not required to be maintained by the Terracina at the Vineyards Homeowner's
Association.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same,
this _ day of , 2005.
DATE:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal
sufficiency:
Jennifer A. Belpedio
Assistant Collier County Attorney
Agenda Item No, 16A3
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and
drainage improvements for the final plat of "Jubilation". The roadway and
drainage improvements will be privately maintained
OBJECTIVE:
To grant final approval of the infrastructure improvements associated with that
subdivision known as "Jubilation"
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. On April 8, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners granted preliminary
acceptance of the roadway and drainage improvements in "Jubilation".
2. The roadway and drainage improvements will be maintained by the
project's homeowners association.
3.
The required improvements have been constructed in accordance with the
Land Development Code. The Engineering Services Department has
inspected the improvements and is recommending final acceptance of the
improvements.
,.-..,
4. A resolution for final acceptance has been prepared and approved by the
County Attorney's Office. A copy of the document is attached.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The roadway and drainage improvements will be maintained by the project's
homeowners association,
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the Resolution.
,-
Agenda Item No. 16A3
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 5
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of County Commissioners grant final acceptance of the roadway
and drainage improvements in "Jubilation" and release the maintenance
security .
1. Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached resolution authorizing
final acceptance.
2. Authorize the release of the maintenance security.
PREPARED BY: John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review
Department
,...--
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Dale
Agenda Item No, 16A3
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 5
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16A3
RecommendatlOlllo grant final approval of the roadway (private) and drainage
improvements tor the final plat of Jubilation" The roadway and drainage improvements
will be privately maintained
5110/20059.0000 AM
Prepared By
Senior Engineer
41181200511:20:56 AM
John Houldsworth
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Date
Engineering Services
Thomas E. Kuck, P.E.
COES Engineering Services Director
Date
Approved By
Communlty Development &
Environmental Services
CDES Engineering Services
41181200512:47 PM
Sandra Lea
Executive Secretary
Date
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4118/2005 1 ;56 PM
Constance A. Johnson
Date
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4/19/2005 3:57 PM
Date
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
EnvirDnmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services. Adminstrator
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4125/20053:11 PM
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4126120059:10 AM
Mark Isackson
Budget Analyst
Date
Approved By
County Manager-'s Office
Office of Management & Budget
412912005 10;56 AM
Michael Srnykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/2912005 12: 1 0 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
41301200512:56 PM
C") L!) L!)
<(0.....
(DOO
..-N<<:;t
cioal
Z"- OJ
E>-ro
roo..
~~
ro
"0
c
al
OJ
<(
"
~
o
~
a..
<{
~
I.LJ
I--
en
]lY.)S 0110N /
- Z-- z
0
::: ~
~ :::J i
"'
N on
'"
S'
f' N
N
S'
f'
::'
N
61: '~'S
c:
o W
N W
...J
'"
N
~
:::
::'
N
"
g
~
~
...
N
~
'"
<i
o
:'
:::J
a..
<{
~
z
o
~
u
o
.....J
Agenda Item No, 16A3
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 5
RESOLUTION NO. 05-_
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE
OF THOSE ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS IN JUBILATION, RELEASE OF
THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT
THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE
ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
THA T ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED
BY THE JUBILA TION HOMEOWNER'S
ASSOCIA TION
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on
July 3 1,2001 approved the plat of Jubilation for recording; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway and
drainage improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications as
required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as
amended); and
WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway and
drainage improvements and release of his maintenance security; and
WHEREAS, the Engineering Services Section of the Development Services
Department has inspected the roadway and drainage improvements, and is recommending
acceptance of said facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is
hereby granted for those roadway and drainage improvements in Jubilation and authorize
the Clerk to release the maintenance security.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the
future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway and drainage improvements
that are not required to be maintained by the Jubilation Homeowner's Association.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same,
this _ day of ,2005.
DATE:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal
sufficiency:
Jennifer A. Belpedio
Assistant Collier County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 16M
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of "Black Bear Ridge - Phase I",
approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of
the amount of the performance security
OBJECTIVE:
To approve for recording the final plat of "Black Bear Ridge - Phase I", a subdivision of lands
located in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, following the
alternative procedure for approval of subdivision plats pursuant to Resolution 99-199.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the construction drawings,
specifications, and final plat of "Black Bear Ridge - Phase I". These documents are in
compliance with the County Land Development Code and Florida State Statute No. 177. All
fees have been paid. Security in the amount of 10% of the total cost of the required
improvements, and 100% of the cost of any remaining improvements, together with a
Construction and Maintenance Agreement for Subdivision Improvements, shall be provided and
accepted by the Engineering Services Director and the County Attorney's office prior to the
recording of the final plat. This would be in conformance with the County Land Development
Code -- Section 10.02.04.
..-..
Engineering Services Department recommends that the final plat of "Black Bear Ridge - Phase
I" be approved for recording,
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project cost is $2,273,228.00 (estimated) to be borne by the
developer.
The cost breakdown is as follows:
a)
b)
Water & Sewer
Drainage,
Paving, Grading
- $ 657,636.00
- $1,615,592.00
The Security amount, equal to 110% of the
project cost, is $2,500,550.80
The County will realize revenues as follows:
,--
Fund: Community Development Fund 131
Agency: County Manager
Cost Center: 138327 -- Engineering Project Review
Revenue generated by this project:
Total: $69,451.84
,-'
--'
Agenda Item No, 16M
May 10, 2005
Fees are based on a construction estimate of $2,273,228.00 and were pcil0l2 of 4
July, 2004 and January, 2005.
The breakdown is as follows:
a) Plat Review Fee ($1,000.00 + $5./ac) -$ 1,255.00
b) Construction Drawing Review Fee
Water &
Sewer (.75% const. est.) - $ 4,932.27
c) Drainage,
Paving, Grading (.75% const. est.) - $12,116.94
d) Construction Inspection Fee
Water &
Sewer (2.25% const. est.) - $14,796.81
e) Drainage, Paving,
Grading(2.25%const.est.) - $36,350.82
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
The developer must receive a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities prior to the issuance of
the construction plan final approval letter.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
There are no outstanding environmental issues.
HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
There are no historical or archaeological impacts. If during the course of site clearing,
excavation or other construction activity, a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all
development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be
immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the plat and associated legal
documents.
RECOMMENDA TION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Final Plat of "Black Bear Ridge -
Phase I" for recording with the following stipulations:
1. Approve the amount of $2,500,550.80 as performance security for the required
improvements; or such lesser amount based on work completed, and as is approved by the
Engineering Services Department.
2. Approve the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement, and
a. That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the required improvements have
received preliminary acceptance.
b. That the plat not be recorded until suitable security and an appropriate Construction
and Maintenance Agreement is approved and accepted by the Engineering Services
Department Director and the County Attorney's office.
PREPARED BY: John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Department
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No, 16A4
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD DF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16M
Recommendation to approve for recording the fInal plat of "Black Bear Ridge - Phase I",
approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of
the amount of the performance security
5110/200590000 AM
Prepared By
Senior Engineer
4119/2U0511:05:59 AM
John Houldsworth
Community Development &
Environmental Service"
Date
Engineering Services
Thomas E. Kuck, P,E.
COES Engineering Services Director
Dale
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
COES Engineering Services
4/19/2005 12:27 PM
Constance A. Johnson
Date
A pproved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services AdmirL
4/20/20057:37 AM
Sandra Lea
Date
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Executive Secretary
Community Development &
Environmental Services Adjoin.
4/20/200511:07 AM
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Develol)ment &
Environmental Service5. Adminstrator
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services. Admin.
4125120053:12 PM
Approved By
Administrative Assistant
Date
OMS Coordinator
County Manager's Office
Office of Manugement & Budget
4/26/20059:1. AM
Mark Isacks.on
Budget Analyst
Dale
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29120053:20 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
County Manager's. Office
Manugement & Budget Director
Dute
Office of Management & Budget
5/1120054: 17 PM
James. V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Approved By
Board of County
Commis.sioners
County Manager's Office
5/2/200511 :19 AM
-
~L!)~
<(0_
(000
.-N~
00(1)
Z"- en
E fU~
~~
ell
"0
C
(I)
en
<(
(~C;;6.lf::l) (RI'f'1J\I"M)&~
n
~
,
V> ~ 0-
w '"
"- 0 <(
..
Z ~
~ ~ ~
~ (II
:;)
"- ~
~ w
:i 0 ~ " L1J
~ "
~ .....
~
-
en
~
~
~
~
I
<
!!.
~
rl
~
~
IS"
.0
~~
~
d
~ ~
.
" ~
~
h ~
o' il
..~ g-' ~
a~ ~ g:
~- ii
HOJ!)NUNI"lH
8
~
'"
W
W
'"
U
~
0
~
~
~
iE
I
rrns OJ. LON / -.- ~
- g
~
~
W
. 8" ~ ID
~,
5 ~ ~ ~~ :.::
u
~
...J
~ ! ~ ID
~
~. ". 5..
~ a~ N~ I'l ~:
~ - (i i
~~ r
g ~ ~
~ ~ I
~" ~ ~
N~-- ~. ~ 0-
~ ::3::;;
oz ~ ~ ~
z' ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~~- <(
g i r
"~ ~
""'A3'Y1ClII lBIT100 ~.
~.lr:) a
~ ~ ~ Z
6 0
"~ o ~ "~ >
. " ~ . -
u ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~
g g ~~
U
~ ~ ' 0
~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ....J
ti~~ w ~~:;
. ~~" ~ f" 8 .. - r'
g~5 .z 5~ f
~, ~ '"
~ Ii
awAnlOll IMI01
~~
i~ ~
~-
i~ ~
g~
~~
Agenda Item No, 16A5
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadway (private) and
drainage improvements for the final plat of "Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen". The
roadway and drainage improvements will be privately maintained
OBJECTIVE:
To grant final approval of the infrastructure improvements associated with that
subdivision known as "Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen"
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. On March 27, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners granted
preliminary acceptance of the roadway and drainage improvements in
"Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen".
2. The roadway and drainage improvements will be maintained by the
project's homeowners association.
--
3.
The required improvements have been constructed in accordance with the
Land Development Code. The Engineering Services Department has
inspected the improvements and is recommending final acceptance of the
improvements,
4. A resolution for final acceptance has been prepared and approved by the
County Attorney's Office. A copy of the document is attached.
5. This Executive Summary has been reviewed and approved by the
Transportation Services Division.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The roadway and drainage improvements will be maintained by the project's
homeowners association.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the Resolution.
-.
Agenda Item No, 16A5
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 5
RECOMMENDA liON:
That the Board of County Commissioners grant final acceptance of the roadway
and drainage improvements in "Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen" and release the
maintenance security.
1. Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached resolution authorizing
final acceptance.
2. Authorize the release of the maintenance security.
PREPARED BY: John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review
Department
-
,,-.'
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No, 16A5
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of5
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16A5
Recommendation to grant final approval of the roadwa~ (private) and drainage
improvements for the final plat at' .'Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen' The roadway and drainage
tmprovements will be privately mamtained
5110/2005900:00 AM
Prepared By
Senior Engineer
4/20120059:31 :35 AM
John Houldsworth
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Date
Engineering Services
Sandra Lea
Executive Secretary
Date
Approved By
Community Development &
Environrnental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4120/200511:10 AM
Approved By
COES Engineering Services Director
Date
Thomas E. KlJck. P.E.
Community Development &
Environmental Services
COES Engineering Services
4120/20051:12 PM
Gonstal,ce A. Johnson
Date
A pproved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4/20/2005 3:44 PM
Approyed By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services. Adminstrator
Dute
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4/25120053:15 PM
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/26/20059:28 AM
Mark Isackson
Budget Analyst
Date
Approyed By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 4:45 PM
Michael Srnykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
Approyed By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/1/20054:20 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commis.sioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
5/212005 11 :43 AM
Ln Ln Ln
<(0_
(000
'<""N'<t
c:i6Q)
Z"- OJ
E i'O 6':
~~
ro
<:J
c
Q)
OJ
<(
3l't'JS OL ..ION I ___.
- -C-
OW1aVlOO
ow
..- ......
i
i ~
~
,.. ~~
-~e
~~
~
.
~ ~
~
::.
~~
-.
(u,"m1Mll
a..
<(
~
UJ
~
en
z
UJ
UJ
.-
~
o
I&..
en
~
o
i
a..
<(
~
z
o
~
<(
U
o
...J
Agenda Item No, 16A5
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 5
RESOLUTION NO. 05-_
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE
OF THOSE ROADW A Y AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS IN GREY OAKS UNIT
FOURTEEN, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE
SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT
REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE GREY
OAKS HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on
December 14, 1999 approved the plat of Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen for recording; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway and
drainage improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications as
required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as
amended); and
WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway and
drainage improvements and release of his maintenance security; and
WHEREAS, the Engineering Services Section of the Development Services
Department has inspected the roadway and drainage improvements, and is recommending
acceptance of said facilities.
--.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is
hereby granted for those roadway and drainage improvements in Grey Oaks Unit
Fourteen and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the
future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway and drainage improvements
that are not required to be maintained by the Grey Oaks Homeowner's Association.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same,
this _ day of ,2005,
DATE:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal
sufficiency:
Jennifer A. Belpedio
Assistant Collier County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 16A6
May 10. 2005
Page 1 of 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of "Valencia Lakes Phase 7-A",
approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of
the amount of the performance security
OBJECTIVE:
To approve for recording the final plat of "Valencia Lakes Phase 7-A", a subdivision of lands
located in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, following the
alternative procedure for approval of subdivision plats pursuant to Resolution 99-199.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the construction drawings,
specifications, and final plat of "Valencia Lakes Phase 7-A". These documents are in
compliance with the County Land Development Code and Florida State Statute No. 177. All
fees have been paid. Security in the amount of 10% of the total cost of the required
improvements, and 100% of the cost of any remaining improvements, together with a
Construction and Maintenance Agreement for Subdivision Improvements, shall be provided and
accepted by the Engineering Services Director and the County Attorney's office prior to the
recording of the final plat. This would be in conformance with the County Land Development
Code -- Section 10.02.04.
-.
Engineering Services Department recommends that the final plat of "Valencia Lakes Phase 7-
A" be approved for recording.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project cost is $401,370.44 (estimated) to be borne by the
developer.
The cost breakdown is as follows:
a)
b)
Water & Sewer
Drainage,
Paving, Grading
- $132,864.00
- $268,506.44
The Security amount, equal to 110% of the
project cost, is $441,507,48
The County will realize revenues as follows:
"-"
Fund: Community Development Fund 131
Agency: County Manager
Cost Center: 138327 -- Engineering Project Review
Revenue generated by this project:
Total: $9,135.19
Agenda Item No. 16A6
May 10, 2005
Fees are based on a construction estimate of $268,506.44 (does not inclLfijse 2 of 4
Orangetree Utilities) and were paid in May, 2003.
The breakdown is as follows:
a) Plat Review Fee ($1,000,00 + $5./ac) -$1,080.00
b) Construction Drawing Review Fee
Water &
Sewer (.75% const. est.) - N/A
c) Drainage,
Paving, Grading (.75% const. est.) - $2,013.80
d) Construction Inspection Fee
Water &
Sewer (2.25% const. est.) - N/A
e) Drainage, Paving,
Grading(2.25%const.est.) - $6,041.39
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
The developer must receive a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities prior to the issuance of
the construction plan final approval letter.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
There are no outstanding environmental issues.
HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
There are no historical or archaeological impacts. If during the course of site clearing,
excavation or other construction activity, a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all
development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be
immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted.
lEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the plat and associated legal
documents.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Final Plat of "Valencia lakes Phase 7-
A" for recording with the following stipulations:
1. Approve the amount of $441,507.48 as performance security for the required improvements;
or such lesser amount based on work completed, and as is approved by the Engineering
Services Department.
2. Approve the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement, and
a. That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the required improvements have
received preliminary acceptance.
b. That the plat not be recorded until suitable security and an appropriate Construction
and Maintenance Agreement is approved and accepted by the Engineering Services
Department Director and the County Attorney's office.
........"
PREPARED BY: John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Department
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No, 16A6
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16A6
Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of 'Valencia Lakes Phase 7-A",
approval 01 the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of
the amount af the performance secunty
511 0!2005 9 00 00 AM
Prepared By
Senior Engineer
4121120059:59:34 AM
John Houldsworth
Community Development &
Environmental SeJ'Vices
Date
Engineering Services
Thomas E, Kuck, P.E,
COES Engineering Services Director
Date
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
COES Engineering Services
412112005 10:11 AM
Sandra Lea
Executive Secretary
Date
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4121120054: 35 PM
Constance A. Johnson
Dale
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations. Analyst
Community Development &
EnvirOflmental Services Admir\.
4122/200510:02 AM
Dale
Approved By
JOl:ieph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services. Adminstr.ator
Community Development &
Enviro"mental Services. Admin.
4125/20053:56 PM
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4126120059:21 AM
Approved By
Budget Analyst
Date
Mark Isacks.on
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
512120058:33 AM
Michael Smykowski
Manl.lgement & Budget Director
Date
A pproved By
County Manager's. Office
Office of Management & Budget
5121200512:02 PM
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Approved By
Board of County
Commis.sioners
County Manager's Office
5/2/2005 5: 29 PM
co L!) "<:I'
<(0_
COoo
"-"'"<:1'
ooa>
Z..-cn
ro
E ~a..
~2
ro
-0
c
a>
cn
<(
l!
::'
~~~
~.
~
::::1:
:::~!:::
oz
~ :!
~
~
5
Ii
g
("lf~) <NOY
, .......
a~~~
-li<~
g~~
.
<I""l~~'l
-~5~
OWraYlOll NllI1IM
~
~:o
~ ~ ~
~
N
N
::;)
W
Cl
Cl
z
o
w-
f-!;(
000
o
-'
"J"N 133M1S HJ..
~ i
~ ~
g !,!
.... 5 ~ ~
N Fe
g~~
~
~:;;
~~~
N!:
oz
z'
~
~ ~;
~~
! .
::;
~
~
~
~
5
~
~~
~ ~~
~
fl
~
~~
~.
~~
Ii
g
" e
~ .~
:~~
.
.....~~~
NZ<....
~~~
i
fl
~
::J::;
~~~
~
!,!
~
~
"''''
N N
N ....
N N
(S)~31N3J
(J,\18 llVONV~
~\f~-~Ii"l
~
::J~
~h
f
~
E.
~~~
~'
g
fl
6Q
~~=
~~
~
fl
~
~"
~~=
~~
~
~
;;;
J"TV:>S OJ. !ON /
-
OWraYlOll
..,
N
::;)
W
Cl
Cl
:n~ J.S Hi'il
n..
<(
~
UJ
~
(/)
l')
N
:I
W
Cl
Cl
c(
"
~
~
c(
~
U)
~
~
~~
~.
r
fl
"
~!:
N ~~
~ n..
~ <(
~ ~
:3! I!'
I') ~I- ~ .
.
o. p~ z
r .~ 0
~
-
~
~= <(
U
~~i 0
....J
c(
U
z
~
c(
>
fl
50
"'~~
~
.
;1~ '"
~ ~a ~
gW ~
Agenda Item No, 16A 7
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 15
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve an Agreement for Sale and Purchase with John S. and
Alberta R. Fallowfield for 1.14 acre under the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition
Program, at a cost not to exceed $37,850.
OBJECTIVE: Request approval and execution of the attached Agreement for Sale and
Purchase (Agreement) between the Board of County Commissioners (Board) and John S. and
Alberta R. Fallowfield (Fallowfield'sl.
CONS!': CPA TJO,,"S:i;) Janua"\ =5, :OC:, ~e')8. !:~';T (JL tn B",'d 2: "'wed
(onser\alior, Collier Land Aquisition Au\ isory COl11t11iUee ICCL:1.ACi recommended (,yclc: L
- Active Acquisition List. \vith changes, and directed staff to actively pursue acquisition of the
properties under the Conservation Collier Program.
The Fallowfield's parcel contains 1.14 acre and is located within Golden Gate Estates, Unit 65
(Winchester Head Multi-parcel Project). In accordance with the approved Conservation Collier
Purchasing Policy, the purchase price of $37,000 was based upon one independent, state-
certified, general real estate appraiser.
The attached Agreement for Sale and Purchase provides that should the County elect not to close
this transaction for any reason, except for default by the Fallowfield's, the County will pay the
Fallowfield's $370 in liquidated damages,
"....-..
The CCLAAC approved this transaction on May 9, 2005, and voted to recommend Board
approval and execution ofthe attached Agreement.
Pursuant to Ordinance 2003-63, Section 13(8), a Project Design Report for the property IS
provided herewith.
The Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office and
Environmental Services Department.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of acquisition will not exceed $37,850 ($37,000 for the
property, $250 for the appraisal, and approximately $600 for the title commitment, title policy,
and recording of documents). The funds will be withdrawn from the Conservation Collier Trust
Fund (I 72). As of May 9, 2005, property costs for Conservation Collier properties, including
this property and those under contract, total $28,905,150.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: Fee simple acqUlSltlon of conservation lands is
consistent with and supports Policy 1.3 .1 (e) in the Conservation and Coastal Management
Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
~
Agenda Item No, 16A7
Mav 10, 2005
Page ;2 of 15
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Conservation Collier - Agreement for Sale and Purchase - Fallowfield
Page 2
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The Conservation Collier Ordinance (2002-63) provides a
legal framework for property acquisition for the Conservation Collier Program. The process for
acquiring this property falls within the legal framework of Ordinance 2002-63.
RFCOl\f1VfENfI,\ TIO":-..: Slaffi" recommending the Board OfCOlm1\ Commissj"ners:
I. Approve the attached Agreement and accept the Warranty Deed once it has been
received and approved by the County Attorney's Office; and
2. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement and any and all other County
Attorney's Office approved documents related to this purchase; and
3. Authorize staff to prepare related vouchers and Warrants for payment; and
",-
4. Direct staff to proceed to acquire the property, to follow all appropriate closing
procedures, to record the deed and any and all necessary documents to obtain clear
title to the property, and to take all reasonable steps necessary to ensure performance
under the Agreement; and
5. Approve any necessary budget amendments.
PREPARED BY: Cindy Erb, Senior Property Acquisition Specialist
Real Estate Services I Facilities Management Department
,......-.,,'
Agenda Item No, 16A 7
May 10, 2005
Page3of15
Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program
Project Design Report
Date: April 11, 2005
Conservation Collier Location Map
Winchester Head
I
[r
//1
i/ /
r /~ ./ I
~.__LJ
,Jl
i * ~
\..,--.---J
Legend -Winchester Head
w+,
,
- C<JIII~-r C.)t;'1t'./ R'.Jad':i
D WnCIl&<;.t~r HtlfI.:l P-ar(rtl'!.
.. i>.ppliC.aMllS
~-L-L.LJ
4'ID 9(jf; ,-t.!"
EM" ,..oru: P..n.I~. c.lIliu.c...tyflrr.,.rty.....,.iur
cr...t....~ OtS' CPIS 11Ii......"...M.I.'''''k..
Q;\c.ltu"".".. ':.IIU ItUl Isc~e",I.:l'WMl1..x.
Q,\C............i... edi., ,.n\ IICIt\C~I.:t\W.1.;..
lht.:I.'1".
Cob,;'" COll~ty
Property Owner: John S. and Alberta R. Fallowfield, Trustees, Fallowfield Family Trust UTD 3-17-00
Folio(s): 39959520000
Location: Golden Gate Estates Unit 65 W75 FT of E 180 FT of Tract 78
Size: 1.14 acres
Appraisal/Offer Amount: $37,000
History of Proiect:
Received Selected for the Approved for Purchase offer Offer Accepted
application ~'i~." category , #1 purchase by BeC made to owners
priority , on the
Active Acquisition
List by CCLAAC
5/25/04 12/15/04 1/25/05 3/15/05 3/22/05
Agenda Item No. 16A 7
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 15
Purpose of Project: Conservation Collier
Pro2:ram Qualifications:
The Winchester Head multi-parcel project. which includes the Fallowfield Trust property, is an
approximately 200-acre undeveloped depressional cypress head and marsh wetland located in NGGE in
Units 62 and 65. The entire site is within North Golden Gate Estates, a target protection area. Three
different roads. one of which is paved. can access the site and from these roads half of the property can be
viewed. The mature cypress and seasonally changing marsh enhance the aesthetic setting of Collier
County. Using aerial photographs, elevation data. soil maps and public input. a total of I] 4 parcels
(about 175 acres) were identified as being important for acquisition. One of the most important reasons
for th:. nomination of Winchesl~:' Head is that this ,~2 fun.::tions to prCividc flax: .,: ; .'
~l[rr(\~l:-:<;;-l::: h.\~ne .:::, " jurjr;~ :li~~ :~~1_in~, s~a~()n. In L: '.. .'-I::"se l.\'pes O~~ ~j~>'v",=,s.s;r;(~ .<~;~-__',:_.:'
inciuu.:':' in t11(; wat.: ji1ana~'c:;lent :ilod.:' lor the GoiClcn uate cana! SYS1:;:r:; cia;" J~ lIL ::;1,:- .ypre:,
Basin. South Florida Water Management District and are a component or flood control for the area.
Other criteria that would be satisfied by a purchase here include protection of surface and ground water
resources, protection of wetland dependent species habitat, good potential for restoration and low
estimated management costs. Listed plant species were observed, while a listed wildlife species (Florida
black bear) has been documented at the edges of the property. During a March 2004 site visit, it was
noted that there was significant standing water, that many birds are using the area, and that the wetland
areas are nearly free of invasive exotic plant life, indicating good ecological value. Currently, 9 owners
have shown interest in selling their lots to the program. See the Initial Criteria Screening Report for full
criteria evaluation.
Proiected Mana2ement Activities:
Active management of this project would not be feasible until a significant contiguous area could be
acquired. Since the area is relatively free of exotic plants. minimal control efforts consisting of herbicide
applications on exotics at the edges of owned properties could be done until a larger area is acquired.
Because of the wetland nature of the site, trails are not recommended. A raised boardwalk would be the
best public access opportunity. however, this is not proposed until some time well into the future of the
project when more parcels are acquired. Nature photography and bird watching are two activities that can
occur at present. It might be possible to allow schoo] children to visit specific parcels as part of an
educational program about wetlands. Currently, the two roads (3th and 39th Streets NE) provide access
but the only parking is the road right-of-way. Until theTe are enough parcels acquired to provide a
resource destination, a visitor parking area is not necessary, but this may be constructed in the future.
Land Development Code changes are necessary in order to allow construction of a parking area. Also in
the future, an educational kiosk could be placed along one of the roads through the property. It would
contain information on wetlands and on the preservation of the area. Signs can be placed at boundaries
along 37th and 39u1 St. NW. Minimal management activities, like trash removal can be accomplished
using both contracted and volunteer labor.
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No 16A7
May 10 2005
Page 5 at 15
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16.1.1.7
ReCOn';!11endatlon tc approve an Agreement for Sale an'=.1 Purchase WIth ~ohn Sand
;\Ioeria R. Fallowtield for 114 ace unoer the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition
Program, at <.l cost not to exceed $3.7.850
5/10/20059:00'00/4J.J,
Cindy M, Erb
Senior Property Acquisition Specialist
4120120054:23:27 PM
Prep. red By
Administrative Services
Date
Facilities Management
Approved B}
VVillium D Lorf;f1:~, Jr., P,t:
ComY~HP1It'
:::r\.' :~nl;c ',,:.i
cnvironmentu! ServIces Director
Di.ltf
!I'c'ii-onmental SerVIGP"
'i.'2C.l20D~; 5:23 Pf\',
\.rw'nu~ H'
Galt'.
AdminIstrative ServlCt::s
k~,c; :~;:>t<lt;; Ser\!ic:es r'tan.;;:;<;:>
FacilitH~s lV;anagement
4121/2005 '9:17 AM
Skip Cilmp, CJ ,M
Faciljtie~ Management Director
D~tt..
Approved By
Adminjstr:ativi:: Service~
Facilities Management
412112005 2:22 PM
Sandra l.ea
ExecutlYe Secretary
Date
Approved By
C()f'nmlmlty De\ff.'dopme-nt &
Environment~i Sel"Vices
Community Devel()pnwnt &
EnvirOI~ment.1l Services. Admin,
4121J2005 4:3:2 PM
Constance A. Johnson
Operations Analys.t
Date
Approved By
COll1llHmity Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
F.nvirotlrmmtal Services. Admin.
41221200510:14 AM
Approved By
Senior Environmental SpecIalist
D.ate
Alexandra J. Sulecki
Commllnit~1 Development &
Environment~1 5e-l"Vices
Environmental Services
412212005 11 :05 AM
Approved By
~loseph K. Schmitt
Community Development.\
Environmental Services
Community Developtnent &
EnyirQnlll~nta! Services Admjn~lrator
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Service!.': AdmIn
4125/2005 3:14 PM
OMB CDordin~tof
Administri.'lttve Assistant
Date
Approved By
County Manager'!;. Offir.e
Office of Management & Budget
412612005 9: 1 G AM
Marh Isackson
Budget Analyst
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Of1ice
Office of Manugement &. Budget
512{ZOfJ5 8~48 AM
Michael Smykowski
M.ma:gement & Budget Director
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/212005 12:03 PM
Approved By
James V, Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
COlwty Manager's Office
51212005 4:59 PM
CONSERVATION COLLIER
PROPERTY 10 #: 39959520000
Agenda Item No, 16A7
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 15
AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and BETWEEN JOHN S.
FALlOWFIElD AND ALBERTA R. FALLOWFIElD, as Trustees of the Fallowfield
Family Trust dated March 17, 2000, whose address is 825 Oak Park Drive, Morgan
Hill, California. 95037, (hereinafter referred to as "Seller"), and COLLIER COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors and assigns, whose address
is 3301 -"'11iami Trail East Naples, CL 34112, (hereinafter referred to as
I!Pu:'-'.,?':2.';-
VVITN!:.SS=TH
WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of that certain parcel of real property (hereinafter
referred to as "Property"), located in Collier County, State of Florida, and being more
particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof by
reference.
WHEREAS, Purchaser is desirous of purchasing the Property, subject to the
conditions and other agreements hereinafter set forth, and Seller is agreeable to such
sale and to such conditions and agreements,
NOW, THEREFORE, and for and in consideration of the premises and the
respective undertakings of the parties hereinafter set forth and the sum of Ten Dollars
($10,00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as
follows:
I. AGREEMENT
1.01 In consideration of the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions
hereinafter set forth, Seller shall sell to Purchaser and Purchaser shall purchase
from Seller the Property, described in Exhibit "A".
II. PAYMENT OF PURCHASE PRICE
2.01 The purchase price (the "Purchase Price") for the Property shall be Thirty
Seven Thousand Dollars ($37,000), (U.S. Currency) payable at time of closing.
III. CLOSING
3.01 The Closing (THE "CLOSING DATE", "DATE OF CLOSING", OR
"CLOSING") of the transaction shall be held on or before ninety (90) days
following execution of this Agreement by the Purchaser, unless extended by
mutual written agreement of the parties hereto. The Closing shall be held at the
Collier County Attorney's Office, Administration Building, 3301 Tamiami Trail East,
Naples, Florida. The procedure to be followed by the parties in connection with
the Closing shall be as follows:
3.011 Seller shall convey a marketable title free of any liens, encumbrances,
exceptions, or qualifications. Marketable title shall be determined according to
applicable title standards adopted by the Florida Bar and in accordance with
law. At the Closing, the Seller shall cause to be delivered to the Purchaser
the items specified herein and the following documents and instruments duly
executed and acknowledged, in recordable form:
3.0111 Warranty Deed in favor of Purchaser conveying title to the
Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than:
1
CONSERVATION COlliER
PROPERTY 10 #: 39959520000
Agenda Itern No, 16AI
May 10, 200~i
Page 7 of 1 5
(a) The lien for current taxes and assessments.
(b) Such other easements, restrictions or conditions of record.
3.0112 Combined Purchaser-Seller closing statement.
3.0113 A "Gap," Tax Proration, Owner's and Non-Foreign Affidavit," as
required by Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code and as required
by the title insurance underwriter in order to insure the "gap" and issue
the policy contemplated by the title insurance commitment.
3.0114 A W-9 Form, "Request for Taxpayer Identification and
Certification" as required by the Internal Revenue Service.
:;:,Q12A' the Ciosing, th9 [:;3::'12.Ser,:)' "s assignee, shai:::ause to be deiivere: l:;
the Seiie: the ioliowing
3.0121 A negotiable instrument (County Warrant) in an amount equal to
the Purchase Price. No funds shall be disbursed to Seller until the Title
Company verifies that the state of the title to the Property has not
changed adversely since the date of the last endorsement to the
commitment, referenced in Section 4.011 thereto, and the Title
Company is irrevocably committed to pay the Purchase Price to Seller
and to issue the Owner's title policy to Purchaser in accordance with the
commitment immediately after the recording of the deed.
3,0122 Funds payable to the Seller representing the cash payment due
at Closing in accordance with Article III hereof, shall be subject to
adjustment for prorations as hereinafter set forth,
3.02 Each party shall be responsible for payment of its own attorney's fees. Seller,
at its sole cost and expense, shall pay at Closing all documentary stamp taxes due
relating to the recording of the Warranty Deed, in accordance with Chapter 201.01,
Florida Statutes, and the cost of recording any instruments necessary to clear
Seller's title to the Property. The cost of the Owner's Form B Title Policy, issued
pursuant to the Commitment provided for in Section 4.011 below, shall be paid by
Purchaser. The cost of the title commitment shall also be paid by Purchaser.
3.03 Purchaser shall pay for the cost of recording the Warranty Deed. Real
Property taxes shall be prorated based on the current year's tax with due
allowance made for maximum allowable discount, homestead and any other
applicable exemptions and paid by Seller. If Closing occurs at a date which the
current year's millage is not fixed, taxes will be prorated based upon such prior
year's millage,
IV. REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
4.01 Upon execution of this Agreement by both parties or at such other time as
specified within this Article, Purchaser and/or Seller, as the case may be, shall
perform the following within the times stated, which shall be conditions precedent
to the Closing;
4.011 Within fifteen (15) days after the date hereof, Purchaser shall obtain as
evidence of title an AL T A Commitment for an Owner's Title Insurance Policy
(AL T A Form 8-1970) covering the Property, together with hard copies of all
exceptions shown thereon. Purchaser shall have thirty (30) days, following
receipt of the title insurance commitment, to notify Seller in writing of any
objection to title other than liens evidencing monetary obligations, if any,
which obligations shall be paid at closing. If the title commitment contains
exceptions that make the title unmarketable, Purchaser shall deliver to the
Seller written notice of its intention to waive the applicable contingencies or to
terminate this Agreement.
2
CONSERVATION COLLIER
PROPERTY ID #: 39959520000
Agenda Item No. 16/3..7
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 15
4.012 If Purchaser shall fail to advise the Seller in writing of any such
objections in Seller's title in the manner herein required by this Agreement, the
title shall be deemed acceptable. Upon notification of Purchaser's objection to
title, Seller shall have thirty (30) days to remedy any defects in order to convey
good and marketable title, except for liens or monetary obligations which will
be satisfied at Closing. Seller, at its sole expense, shall use its best efforts to
make such title good and marketable, In the event Seller is unable to cure
said objections within said time period, Purchaser, by providing written notice
to Seller within seven (7) days after expiration of said thirty (30) day period,
may accept title as it then IS, waiving any objection; or Purchaser may
terminate the Agreement. A failure Dy Purcnase' to give such written notice of
tomnination wit -, the L-18 [., :;c: ~Y:'Jjjec' nere.~ shall be deemed an elec:'ion
=Jrchas9r ;c ac:'~: ,'I, 0)::,:;: :-:$ te title as shown ir thE title
:;O;T. :-1:. .....~, "=: --I ~
4.013 Purchaser shall have the option, at its own expense, to obtain a current
survey of the Property prepared by a surveyor licensed by the State of Florida.
No adjustments to the Purchase Price shall be made based upon any change
to the total acreage referenced in Exhibit "A", if any. Seller agrees to furnish
any existing surveys of the Property, if any, to Purchaser within thirty (30) days
of execution of this Agreement
V, INSPECTION PERIOD
5.01 Purchaser shall have ninety (90) days from the date of this Agreement,
("Inspection Period'), to determine through appropriate investigation that:
1. Soil tests and e'gineering studies indicate that the Property can be developed
without any abnormal demucKing, soil stabilization or foundations.
2. There are no abnormal drainage or environmental requirements to the
development of the Property.
3. The Property is in compliance with all applicable State and Federal
environmental laws and the Property is free from any pollution or
contamination.
4. The Property can be utilized for its intended purpose.
5.02 If Purchaser is not satisfied, for any reason whatsoever, with the results of
any investigation, Purchaser shall deliver 10 Seller prior to the expiration of the
Inspection Period, written notice of its intention to waive the applicable
contingencies or to terminate this Agreement. If Purchaser fails to notify the Seller
in writing of its specific objections as provided herein within the Inspection Period,
it shall be deemed that the Purchaser is satisfied with the results of its
investigations and the contingencies of this Article V shall be deemed waived. In
the event Purchaser elects to terminate this Agreement because of the right of
inspection, Purchaser shall deliver to Seller copies of all engineering reports and
environmental and soil testing results commissioned by Purchaser with respect to
the Property,
5,03 Purchaser and its agents, employees and servants shall, at their own risk and
expense, have the right to go upon the Property for the purpose of surveying and
conducting site analyses, soil borings and all other necessary investigation,
Purchaser shall, in performing such tests, use due care and shall be responsible
for any loss or damages occasioned thereby and o.gain:::t. Se!lcr shall be notified
by Purchaser no less than twenty-four (24) hours prior to said inspection of the
Property,
VI. INSPECTION
6.01 Seller acknowledges that the Purchaser, or its authorized agents, shall have
the right to inspect the Property at any time prior to the Closing.
CONSERVATION COLLIER
PROPERTY ID it: 39959520000
Agenda Item No, 16A7
Mav 10,2005
Page 9 of 15
VII. POSSESSION
7.01 Purchaser shall be entitled to full possession of the Property at Closing.
VIII. PRORATIONS
8.01 Ad valorem taxes next due and payable, after closing on the Property, shall
be prorated at Closing based upon the gross amount of 2004 taxes, and shall be
paid by Seller.
IX. TERMINATION AND REMEDIES
9.01 If Selle' shai' :levE: tailed to perform any of the covenants and/o a;lreeme"n,
c)ntainee: !'Jerel: 'VTi;:;' a0 to bEe r,e;iormec' b~ Selie' withw ten Y day:: ::/
written notiflca:lon OT SJC,i iailure, Purchaser may, aT itS option, terminate t:ll::
Agreement by giving written notice of termination to Seller. Purchaser shall have
the right to seek and enforce all rights and remedies available at law or in equity
to a contract vendee, including the right to seek specific performance of this
Agreement.
9.02 If the Purchaser has not terminated this Agreement pursuant to any of the
provisions authorizing such termination, and Purchaser fails to close the
transaction contemplated hereby or otherwise fails to perform any of the terms,
covenants and conditions of this Agreement as required on the part of Purchaser
to be performed, provided Seller is not in default, then as Seller's sole remedy,
Seller shall have the right to terminate and cancel this Agreement by giving written
notice thereof to Purchaser, whereupon one percent (1%) of the purchase price
shall be paid to Seller as liquidated damages which shall be Seller's sole and
exclusive remedy, and neither party shall have any further liability or obligation to
the other except as set forth in paragraph 12.01, (Real Estate Brokers), hereof.
The parties acknowledge and agree that Seller's actual damages in the event of
Purchaser's default are uncertain in amount and difficult to ascertain, and that
said amount of liquidated damages was reasonably determined by mutual
agreement between the parties, and said sum was not intended to be a penalty in
nature.
9.03 The parties acknowledge that the remedies described herein and in the other
provisions of this Agreement provide mutually satisfactory and sufficient remedies
to each of the parties, and take into account the peculiar risks and expenses of
each of the parties.
X. SELLER'S AND PURCHASER'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
10.01 Seller and Purchaser represent and warrant the following:
10.011 Seller and Purchaser have full right and authority to enter into and to
execute this Agreement and to undertake all actions and to perform all tasks
required of each hereunder. Seller is not presently the subject of a pending,
threatened or contemplated bankruptcy proceeding.
10.012 Seller has full right, power, and authority to own and operate the
Property, and to execute, deliver, and perform its obligations under this
Agreement and the instrument::; executed in connection herewith, and to
consummate the transaction contemplated hereby. All necessary
authorizations and approvals have been obtained authorizing Seller and
Purchaser to execute and consummate the transaction contemplated hereby.
At Closing, certified copies of such approvals shall be delivered to Purchaser
and/or Seller, if necessary.
10.013 The warranties set forth in this Article shall be true on the date of this
Agreement and as of the date of Closing. Purchaser's acceptance of a deed
4
CONSERVATION COLLIER
PROPERTY ID #: 39959520000
Agenda Item No. 16A7
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 15
to the said Property shall not be deemed to be full performance and discharge
of every agreement and obligation on the part of the Seller to be performed
pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement
10.014 Seller represents that it has no knowledge of any actions, suits, claims,
proceedings, litigation or investigations pending or threatened against Seller,
at law, equity or in arbitration before or by any federal, state, municipal or other
governmental instrumentality that relate to this agreement or any other
property that could, if continued, adversely affect Seller's ability to sell the
Property to Purchaser according to the terms of this Agreement.
10.015 No party or person other than Purchaser has any right or option to
a~:;u ''2 the :::':))e,-:\ :)' any portior thereof.
'iC,~":: _'"t: ::'. CE:? ':..: ': =~IJS::'- ':::0 long at:. ;,,;ree:nent remains I;'
force ii;ld efie::t, Selier shar not en:::umber or convey any portion of the
Property or any rights therein, nor enter into any agreements granting any
person or entity any rights with respect to the Property or any part thereof,
without first obtaining the written consent of Purchaser to such conveyance,
encumbrance, or agreement which consent may be withheld by Purchaser for
any reason whatsoever.
10.017 Seller represents that there are no incinerators, septic tanks or
cesspools on the Property; all waste, if any, is discharged into a public sanitary
sewer system; Seller represents that they have (it has) no knowledge that any
pollutants are or have been discharged from the Property, directly or indirectly
into any body of water. Seller represents the Property has not been used for
the production, handling, storage, transportation, manufacture or disposal of
hazardous or toxic substances or wastes, as such terms are defined in
applicable laws and regulations, or any other activity that would have toxic
results, and no such hazardous or toxic substances are currently used in
connection with the operation of the Property, and there is no proceeding or
inquiry by any authority with respect thereto, Seller represents that they have
(it has) no knowledge that there is ground water contamination on the Property
or potential of ground water contamination from neighboring properties. Seller
represents no storage tanks for gasoline or any other substances are or were
located on the Property at any time during or prior to Seller's ownership
thereof. Seller represents none of the Property has been used as a sanitary
landfill.
10.018 Seller has no knowledge that the Property and Seller's operations
concerning the Property are in violation of any applicable Federal, State or
local statute, law or regulation, or of any notice from any governmental body
has been served upon Seller claiming any violation of any law, ordinance,
code or regulation or requiring or calling attention to the need for any work,
repairs, construction, alterations or installation on or in connection with the
Property in order to comply with any laws, ordinances, codes or regulation with
which Seller has not complied.
10.019 There are no unrecorded restrictions, easements or rights of way
(other than existing zoning regulations) that restrict or affect the use of the
Property, and there are no maintenance, construction, advertising,
management, leasing, employment, service or other contracts affecting the
Property.
10,020 Seller has no knowledge that there are any suits, actions or arbitration,
bond issuances or proposals therefor, proposals for public improvement
assessments, pay-back agreements, paving agreements, road expansion or
improvement agreements, utility moratoriums, use moratoriums, improvement
moratoriums, administrative or other proceedings or governmental
investigations or requirements, formal or informal, existing or pending or
threatened which affects the Property or which adversely affects Seller's ability
5
CONSERVATION COLLIER
PROPERTY 10 #: 39959520000
Agenda Item No, 16A7
May 1 0, 2005
Page 11 of 15
to perform hereunder; nor is there any other charge or expense upon or
related to the Property which has not been disclosed to Purchaser in writing
prior to the effective date of this Agreement
10.021 Seller acknowledges and agrees that Purchaser is entering into this
Agreement based upon Seller's representations stated above and on the
understanding that Seller will not cause the zoning or physical condition of the
Property to change from its existing state on the effective date of this
Agreement up to and including the Date of Closing. Therefore, Seller agrees
not to enter into any contracts or agreements pertaining to or affecting the
Property and not to do any act or omit to perform any act which would change
the zoning or physical condition of the Property or the governmental
ordinances or laws governing same, Selle~ also agrees to notify Purchaser
promptly of any change ire th€- fa::!" contal:'18c in thE' toregCling representations
anc of any nCltice or pm::;osec: cnange in the zoning, o~ any atr,e action or
notice, that may be proposed or promulgated by any third pE c"1I9S or any
governmental authorities having jurisdiction of the development of the property
which may restrict or change any other condition of the Property.
10.022 At the Closing, Seller shall deliver to Purchaser a statement
(hereinafter called the "Closing Representative Statement") reasserting the
foregoing representations as of the Date of Closing, which provisions shall
survive the Closing.
10,023 Seller represents, warrants and agrees to indemnify, reimburse, defend
and hold Purchaser harmless from any and all costs (including attorney's fees)
asserted against, imposed on or incurred by Purchaser, directly or indirectly,
pursuant to or in connection with the application of any federal, state, local or
common law relating to pollution or protection of the environment which shall
be in accordance with, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980,42 U.S.C. Section 9601,
et seq., ("CERCLA" or "Superfund"), which was amended and upgraded by the
Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("SARA"), including
any amendments or successor in function to these acts. This provision and
the rights of Purchaser, hereunder, shall survive Closing and are not deemed
satisfied by conveyance of title,
10.024 Any loss and/or damage to the Property between the date of this
Agreement and the date of Closing shall be Seller's sole risk and expense.
XI. NOTICES
11,01 Any notice, request, demand, instruction or other communication to be
given to either party hereunder shall be in writing, sent by facsimile with
automated confirmation of receipt, or by registered, or certified mail, return receipt
requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
If to Purchaser:
Alexandra Sulecki, Coordinator
Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program
Collier County Environmental Services Department
2800 North Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, Florida 34104
Telephone number: 239-732-2505
Fax number: 239-213-2960
With a copy to:
Cindy M. Erb, Senior Property Acquisition Specialist
Collier County Real Estate Services
Administration Building
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
Telephone number: 239-774-8991
Fax number: 239-774-8876
6
CONSERVATION COLLIER
PROPERTY ID #: 39959520000
Agenda Item No, 16Al
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 15
If to Seller:
John S. & Alberta R. Fallowfield
825 Oak Park Drive
Morgan Hill, California 95037
Telephone number: 408-778-1860
Fax number: A.J 114
11.02 The addressees and numbers for the purpose of this Article may be
changed by either party by giving written notice of such change to the other party
in the manner provided herein. For the purpose of changing such addresses or
addressees only, unless and until such written notice is received, the last
addressee and respective address stated herein shall be deemed to continue in
effect for all purposes.
Y1 P=.L,_ ~~--;--= ~=~"-'<=~~
12.01 Any and all brokerage commissions or fees shall be the sole responsibility
of the Seller, Seller shall indemnify Purchaser and hold Purchaser harmless from
and against any claim or liability for commission or fees to any broker or any other
person or party claiming to have been engaged by Seller as a real estate broker,
salesman or representative, in connection with this Agreement. Seiter agrees to
pay any and all commissions or fees at closing pursuant to the terms of a
separate agreement, if any,
XIII. MISCELLANEOUS
13.01 This Agreement may be executed in any manner of counterparts which
together shalt constitute the agreement of the parties.
13.02 This Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof shalt be effective as of
the date this Agreement is executed by both parties and shall inure to the benefit
of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors,
personal representatives, successors, successor trustee, and assignees
whenever the context so requires or admits.
13.03 Any amendment to this Agreement shall not bind any of the parties hereof
unless such amendment is in writing and executed and dated by Purchaser and
Seller. Any amendment to this Agreement shall be binding upon Purchaser and
Seiter as soon as it has been executed by both parties.
13.04 Captions and section headings contained in this Agreement are for
convenience and reference only; in no way do they define, describe, extend or
limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any provisions hereof.
13.05 All terms and words used in this Agreement, regardless of the number and
gender in which used, shalt be deemed to include any other gender or number as
the context or the use thereof may require.
13.06 No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in
writing signed by the party against whom it is asserted, and any waiver of any
provision of this Agreement shall be applicable only to the specific instance to
which it is related and shall not be deemed to be a continuing or future waiver as
to such provision or a waiver as to any other provision.
13.07 If any date specified in this Agreement faits on a Saturday, Sunday or legal
holiday, then the date to which such reference is made shall be extended to the
next succeeding business day,
13.08 Seiter is aware of and understands that the "offer" to purchase represented
by this Agreement is subject to review and recommendation for approval by the
Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee, and acceptance and
approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida.
7
CONSERVATION COLLIER
PROPERTY 10 #: 39959520000
Agenda Item No, 16A7
May 1 D, Z005
Page 13 of 15
13.09 If the Seller holds the Property in the form of a partnership, limited
partnership, corporation, trust or any form of representative capacity whatsoever
for others, Seller shall make a written public disclosure, according to Chapter 286,
Florida Statutes, under oath, of the name and address of every person having a
beneficial interest in the Property before Property held in such capacity is
conveyed to Collier County. (If the corporation is registered with the Federal
Securities Exchange Commission or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida
Statutes, whose stock is for sale to the general public, it is hereby exempt from
the provisions of Chapter 286, Florida Statutes.)
13.10 This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Fiorid2.,
XIV. EI\;TlhC AG=:EEM:::NT
14.01 This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto contain the entire
agreement between the parties, and no promise, representation, warranty or
covenant not included in this Agreement or any such referenced agreements has
been or is being relied upon by either party. No modification or amendment of
this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless made in writing and executed
and dated by both Purchaser and Seller. Time is of the essence of this
Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set forth their hands seals.
Dated Project/Acquisition Approved by BCC:
AS TO PURCHASER:
DATED:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
, Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
AS TO SELLER
DATED: 09-- 10 - 0 'S
WITNESSES:
ewu-----
,t.11V P '1 CA. ""(> ~ C'l--L.
(P'i~~" C---
(81g ature)
)(6"h
(Printed Name)
C"',,-pbtl\
8
CONSERVATION COLLIER
PROPERTY 10 #: 39959520000
WITNESSES:
~~
LII..,b'1 CA MfJ~eL.L
(Printed Name)
~~ C---
(Signature)
~ jj
..; c. \,
(P~ ."i;~: t'~a~,.
I' j . (
G v-.pL{K \.\
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~tV fJJtJ~~
Ellen T, Chadwell
Assistant County Attorney
Aoenda Item No 16AI
- May10,2005
Page 14 of 15
~fr..~a~
of the Fallowfield Family Trust dated
March 17, 2000
9
Agenda Item No. 16A7
May 1 D, 2005
Page 1 5 of 15
EXHIBIT" A"
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 39959520000
LEGAL. D::SCF.W-ION
THE WEST SEVENTY-FIVE (75') FEET OF THE EAST ONE
HUNDRED EIGHTY (180') FEET OF TRACT 78, GOLDEN GATE
ESTATES, UNIT 65, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 88, OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Agenda Item No, 16A8
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 7
,......_w".'
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to name certain acquired Conservation Collier Preserves
OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to approve the
recommended names for four (4) acquired Conservation Collier preserves.
CONSIDERA nON: ConserVa!i')ll Collier I::: acquired a number of properties that faP
within four (4; general "project" ("lundaries and is in th:.:: process of acquiring additiclla
properties, At prc"llt. s:: ;'- re . '-ring tc L _ "t: pl\lpeniec: :': th. nal~i of th.,_ller. :~)
location, historic nilrne or propch:::d Qc>\elopment project. In order to ready preserves for
pub] ic use, staff would like to assign permanent names.
The Conservation Collier ordinance is silent as to the procedure for naming acquired
preserves. County policy (See Attachment) advises that County-owned facilities are to be
named based on the function they perform or services they provide to the public and that
the specific location, including adjacent right-of-way, body of water or any prominent
landmark, can be included in the name. County policy for naming facilities after persons
is different and very specific, requiring a significant, direct, local benefit and application
supported by at least 1,000 Collier County residents.
.-
The Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (CCLAAC), at the
April 14, 2005 regular monthly meeting, after a call for public input made over a 2-month
period, made recommendations for naming preserves. Public notice and caIl for input
was made in several forms, including: a press release requesting public input sent out in
late February, verbal notice given at the televised March 8th CCLAAC meeting and, an
article appearing in the Naples Daily News asking for public input on March 6, 2005. No
public comment was received and the CCLAAC recommended the following names:
. America's Business Park - Railhead Scrub Preserve
. Gionet/Otter Mound - Otter Mound Preserve
. Visnich - Cocohatchee Creek Preserve
. NGGE unit 53 - Red Maple Swamp Preserve
A staff inquiry was made regarding potential naming of the Otter Mound Preserve,
questioning whether it must go though the procedure specified in the County's naming
policy because a former owner was named Ernest Otter. The County Attorney's office
advised that because the site has been called Otter Mound for some number of years and
that the name was not being used to honor the owner, that this name can be used without
going through the process specified in the policy.
FISCAL IMP ACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with naming preserves.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This request conforms to the adopted County-owned
facility naming policy as reviewed by the County Attorney's Office.
,-'
Agenda Item No, 16A8
May 10,2005
Page 2 of 7
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the recommended names for
acq uired Conservation Co Ilier preserves.
PREPARED BY: Alexandra J. Sulecki, Coordinator, Conservation Collier Program
....-.."
~.
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Dale
Agenda Item No, 1uAB
May 10}OO~
Page ,; of I
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16,~8
Recommendation to name certain f.,cqu;red Conservation Colli-er Preserves.
5/1C/2005 900:00 AM
Prepared By
Senior EUlJironmental Sp~cialfst
4120120059:48:35 AM
Aiexandr<J J. Sulecki
Community Development &
[~nvifonmental Services
Date
Environmental Services
S<lndra LEi:
Executive Sec!'etary
Dilt'E'!
Approved By
'~.OMml;nitl,' Deveiopn,~r:~ ,I;,.
':\'i,"tmmoont.,d Services
COlTlmUM!rv [)c\.!ei0om~nt &
4!2()!20Q~J .~:4C PIV
~:nVlronmen:2~ Sc':ices AomH.
::r,vrn:"!Hi, ~'.'~:, St'~'VlCCS D\n~G~o:
Ci.'.ltt'
Appro\'cd H'
VJdii'-!n' [.,_ Lon.'!'>:' J;, F.:
CDmmumty DlO'veinpment S.
Environmental Service!>
E:nvironmenttll Service:!>
4/20/20055:15 PM
Operations Analyst
Date
Approved B)-'
Constance A. Johnson
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmentaf Services Admin.
4/22:1200510:06 AM
A pproved By
Joseph K Schmitt
Community Development &
EnvironrnE:!ntal Ser/ices
Community Development &
fnvironmiOlntal Services Admim;1r-ator
Date
Community D(lvelopmcnt &
Environmental Services Admin.
4125120053:56 PM
OMS CODrdlnator
Administrative- A..5ist:lnt
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/26120053:25 AM
Approved By
Mark IsacKson
Count}' l\tanager's Offic€'
Budget Analyst
Dute
Office of Management & Blldget.
512120058:56 AM
Michael Smykowski
Date
Approved By
County Manager's. Office
Management & Budget Director
OffIce of Management & Budget
5/2t2005 12:06 PM
Approved By
James V, Mudd
Board of County
Coml11is.sjonerr.
Cou.nty Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
5/412005 9: 36 AM
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
POLICY FOR NAMING COlINTY-OWNED BUILDING, STRUCTURE, OR FACILITY
I. Namin!!: of Countv-Owned Buildin!!:. Structure or Facilitv.
The following is the policy of the County !\1anager of Collier County, Florida, regarding
naming Collier County-owned buildings, structures, or other County-owned facilities. Each
County-owned building. structure, or facility. or integral part therein. e.g., chapel in a hospital.
hereinafter "facility," shall be named based upon the function\si the facility performs or the
SCf\::':' :,rovio":d Ie the pubk ];-0:11 tn: fa:i!ir-, ~
"1"'.. 'flc I(L':.j,y ,1;~ ;'Ie fa:':]Jt', n,':, ,Y
course. be included in the name; for eXilmpie. an ad.iacem rignl-of-\\Cl) body oi water, or any
other prominent landmark. Examples: Collier County Courthouse. Central A venue Library,
Sheriff's Annex, Tarpon Lake Park, South Pass. or Pine Ridge Road Library,
II. Namin!!: of County-Owned Buildin!!:, Structure or Facilitv to Honor a Natural
~
"Natural person" means actual human being(s). The Board of County Commissioners
("Board") may name a County-owned facility to honor a natural person or persons, living or
deceased. .Examples could be "1he John Jones County, Courthouse," "The Bill Smith County ~ .
Library," "The Mary White and Bill White Sheriff's Annex," "The Joe Green Museum," "The
Jim Gallagher Pass" or 'The Dan Marino Athletic Field" (provided the Athletic Facility is based
upon a Substantial Financial Contribution).
A. Namin!!: A County-Owned Structure To Honor A Natural Person Based upon
Actions and not based uDon Substantial Financial Contribution(s).
J. The natural person(s) must have, by his or her local actions (other than Substantial
Financial Contribution), specifically and directly benefited Collier County, and, preferably, the
specific facility, or at least the geographic area where the facility exists (or is planned to exist).
(a). Fields of Endeavor. If the public achievements of the sponsored, local natural
person(s) are primarily in a specific field of endeavor, that field of endeavor should have a direct
and significant logical relationship to the facility, As examples: A medical facility should be
Agenda Item No. 16A8
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 7
, 'I Deleted: "!'\atural
named to honor a local physician, a local nurse, or other local practitioner in the field of
medicine. A sports facility should be named in honor a local natural person associated with
athletics. A nautical facility should be named to honor a local natural person associated with
nautical matters. A courthouse should be named to honor a local judge, local lawyer, or a natural
person directly associated with local administration of justice or local law enforcement.
(b). "Specific, Direct, Local Benefit." The natural person whose name the facility is
proposed to honor must have performed significant, direct local benefn to the facility or at leas,
wni: regard to th~ ,,11.;; ofth~ facility (land or wateri. "Significant. direct. i(\~s! benefi'," doe, !l01
include acts by a person who has benefited Florida generally (or has generally benefited the
United States) and has not rendered direct significant local, beneficial acts to benefit Collier
County, the specific facility, or at least the general geographic area of the facility.
(c), Sponsorship. Each recommendation to have a County-owned structure named to
honor a natural person based upon that person's local, beneficial acts (other than a Substantial
Financial Contribution) may be proposed to the County Manager by any individual, any
corporation, any organization or group, but only by using the attached form.
(d). Application Procedure. Each application to recommend naming a County-
owned facility in honor of a natural person based upon that person's local acts (not based upon a
Substantial Financial Contribution) must be submitted to the County Manager by use of the
attached form. Each such sponsored application, when complete, must contain the names,
addresses and signatures of not less than 1,000 natural persons who reside, at least part-time, in
Collier County and who agree with the recommendations of the Sponsor as stated on the form.
The Sponsor's written reasons must include a brief biographical sketch as regards the proposed
natural person(s) and a listing of the significant local beneficial acts performed by the local
natural person, and upon which acts the Sponsor believes it is appropriate that the Board name
the facility.
2
Agenda Item No, 16A8
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 7
B. Namin!!: A Countv-Owned Structure To Honor A "I/atural Person Based upon
Substantial Financial Contribution(s).
I. Notwithstanding any other provision of this policy, except the referral provisions
listed below, a County-owned facility can be named in honor of a natural person(s) provided
substantial sums of money or other substantial, valuable assets (such as land related to the
facility or land situate elsewhere). are contributed to Collier Count\ by. or on behalf of such
natural perSOn(SI, living or u:c:::ased. ((, assist Collier County. directly 0' indirectl:, Jr :l.'auirin~
ti:J. 10 t:le uno~:+lyinb lane:. l(: l~-IC fa~~: . or tc:< J. :-,pe':lli..._ io.:::r::(J.lblt' f)2'-- \; "lhe ~':'1cilit:
(e.g" "The John Jones \\ing of the Collier Count:- Hospital"): provided. however, that such
person has not engaged in illegal, immoral, or otherwise improper conduct No such natural
person need be a local person.
2. If a facility is named and it is thereafter discovered that the natural person
unbeknownst to the County, had engaged in illegal, immoral, or otherwise improper conduct,
that brings discredit upon the County, the County may in its unbridled discretion rename the
facility. If a facility is named after a then living natural person and that person thereafter
engages in illegal, immoral, or otherwise improper conduct, that brings discredit upon the
County, the County in its unbridled discretion, may rename the facility. This discretion to
rename is and shall be subject to any then existing and enforceable provision in a written
agreement to which the County is then a party and wherein the County contracted away this
unbridled discretion to rename the facility,
C. Referrals bv the Countv Mana!!:er.
I. If the County I\1anager determines that the standard form application is complete
and has merit (or that the facility may appropriately be named in honor of a Substantial Financial
Contributor, which does not require use of the standard form or any signatures) the County
Manager shall refer the complete application, or the recommendation to name the facility to
honor a Substantial Financial Contributor, for review comments and suggestions, as follows:
3
Agenda Item No, 16.'\8
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 7
A. To the Constitutional Officer if the facility is or will be occupied by, or is or will
be under the jurisdiction of, that Constitutional Officer; or to the County Division
Administrator(s) if the facility is or will be occupied by, or is or will be under the jurisdiction of,
the Division Administrator(s), to give each such Officer or Administrator ample opportunity to
provide his or her written comments regarding the application or recommendation, including
opinions why the application or recommendation is or is not appropriate.
B. If the facility has historical significance, to each Count~-Affilia1ed Historical
Agenc\ o~ Group,
2. The County Manager may also request input from groups that, or individuals who,
the County Manager believes are closely associated with the respective facility.
3. Following the above-mentioned referrals, the County Manager, with or without
his (or her) recommendation for approval, may place the item on the Board's agenda for a
decision on the merits by the Board,
D. Financial or In-kind Contributions by the County. In all instances, any plaque
or other memorial or notation to be placed on or at the County-owned facility must be approved
by the County, and must be supplied and be paid for in full by others and at no cost to the County
unless the Board decides in the specific case that it is appropriate and is in the public interest for
the County to contribute money and/or in-kind contributions toward any such plaque, memorial
or notation.
III. Duration and Effect of this Policy. This policy was adopted on the 13th day of May,
2003. This policy shall continue until amended or repealed by the County Manager.
James V. Mudd, County Manager
Attachment: Application Form
4
Agenda Item No, 16A8
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 7
Agenda Item No, 16A9
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of "Aviano at Naples", approval
of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the
amount of the performance security
OBJECTIVE:
To approve for recording the final plat cf "D,vianJ at I\;aples", a subdivisiQi'i of lands located in
Section 18. Townshi:::. L? S::Juth, Range 2~ ::2S: ::llile':::Dunt\' :=ior-iaa bllowing the a!ter:iative
procedure for approval of sUDdivision plats pursuant to ResoluIlon 99-199,
CONSIDERA TIONS:
Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the construction drawings,
specifications, and final plat of "Aviano at Naples". These documents are in compliance with the
County Land Development Code and Florida State Statute No. 177. All fees have been paid.
Security in the amount of 10% of the total cost of the required improvements, and 100% of the
cost of any remaining improvements, together with a Construction and Maintenance Agreement
for Subdivision Improvements, shall be provided and accepted by the Engineering Services
Director and the County Attorney's office prior to the recording of the final plat. This would be in
conformance with the County Land Development Code -- Section 10.02,04.
Engineering Services Department recommends that the final plat of "Aviano at Naples" be
approved for recording,
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project cost is $1,797,408.00 (estimated) to be borne by the
developer.
The cost breakdown is as follows:
a)
b)
Water & Sewer
Drainage,
Paving, Grading
- $ 547,324.00
- $1,250,084.00
The Security amount, equal to 110% of the
project cost, is $1,977,148.80
The County will realize revenues as follows:
............
Fund: Community Development Fund 131
Agency: County Manager
Cost Center: 138327 -- Engineering Project Review
Revenue generated by this project:
Total: $55,222.24
Agenda Item No, 16A9
May 10, 2005
Fees are based on a construction estimate of $1 ,797,408.00 and were paJRjWF'l2 of 4
September, 2004,
The breakdown is as follows:
a) Plat Review Fee ($1,000.00 + $5.1ac) -$ 1,300.00
b) Construction Drawing Review Fee
Water &
Sewer (.75% const. est.) - $ 4,104.93
c) Drainage, .
Paving, Grading (.75% const. est) - $ 9,375.63
d) Construction Inspection Fee
\Nater (;
e)
Sev\le<~ \:'.2S~'(::QnSl est.,i
Drainage, Paving,
Grading(2.25%const.est. )
- $":2,314,79
- $28,126.89
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
The developer must receive a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities prior to the issuance of
the construction plan final approval letter.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
There are no outstanding environmental issues.
HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
There are no historical or archaeological impacts, If during the course of site clearing,
excavation or other construction activity, a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all
development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be
immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted.
lEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the plat and associated legal
documents.
RECOMMENDA TION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Final Plat of "Aviano at Naples" for
recording with the following stipulations:
1. Approve the amount of $1,977,148.80 as performance security for the required
improvements; or such lesser amount based on work completed, and as is approved by the
Engineering Services Department.
2. Approve the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement, and
a. That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the required improvements have
received preliminary acceptance.
b. That the plat not be recorded until suitable security and an appropriate Construction
and Maintenance Agreement is approved and accepted by the Engineering Services
Department Director and the County Attorney's office,
,-
PREPARED BY: John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Department
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No 16A9
May 10.2005
Page 3 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16/\9
RecorrJn',endallon to approve for recording ihe final plat of "Aviana at Naples" approval of
tr,6 standard ferm Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount
of fh<:; performance security
5/10/20059:0000 to,M
Prepared By
4.125/20053:19:35 PM
John HouidsworH1
Community Development &.
Environrn~ntal Servio::es
Date
Senior Engineer
Engineering Services
i"llornHs E. l<uck F-'.E:
Date
Approved 8~
Community Devf':loptY\ent
:.= r'l v r~~' ~1 rr~ l' !~., .
CDES ~ngHleenn9 S~}fV1Gt:'~'; Director
'.,U::: 'H]IIlE~en:)
4f25rlDOS 3 - n p ~/
Con~'ot<lnce i... -!e.'tlfli.on
D~wmtl()n,> Analyst
D;ltf:'
Apprtl\ t.~ !I.I
Community Development S.
Environmelital Services
Community D~vejopment S.
Envijonment~! ServIces Admin.
4125120054:01 PM
S3ndr~1 Lea
Date
A pproved By
Community Development &
Environmental Ser~,ices
Executive Secreta!)'
Community Development &
Environmenta! SerVices Admin
4125120054:43 PM
Approved By
Joseph K. SchmItt
Community Devt'loprnl'nt &.
Environmental Se"dce~,
Community Development &
Environmental Servicef. Adminstrator
Datt!
Community Development &.
Environmental Services Admin.
4/26/2005 1 :54 PM
Date
Approved By
OMS CoordlOator
County Manager's Office
Administrative Assistant
Office of Manugement &. Budget
412612005 2:54 PM
DOIte
Approved By
Mark !s3ckson
County Manager's Office
Budget Analys.t
Office of Management &. Budget
4/29/20054:01 PM
Date
Approved By
MH::hael Srnykowski
COllnty MaP1ager's Office
Management & Budget Oirector
Office of MafHlgement & BllC\get.
$/1/20054:18 PM
County Manager
Date
Approved By
James V. Mudd
BO;J;rd of Courlty
Commis.sioners
County Manager's OHI~e
5/2/200512:15 PM
C'>L!)oo::j'
<0_
(000
.,-Noo::j'
00 (l)
Zr- ~
E ?2ct
2~
ro
"D
~
~
w
~
<
:~
!~I
I!I
1"1
,0
"
,0
\ c---'\
1--1
Elw
~
~S
l:J~
J::--y,,,\~
/~" /" \ j~
/.........,) ,('-..y>-'>-- ~,
~;~7 ~
~~
~o
i~
~
~
z
a:
L,
:;,..,.,...., ,iWlI:lODddlKM
~
~
~
Ii
, I
I .
I
\
;
o
o
OJ
<
z
so
~,
z
~
z
o
~:;:
000
o
...J
:...___.-ll.'.'<------
~
.--$
S~~
-l c: ~i, I
D:~i) i
gdl~!
~~!: I
35E=1I!~1
I I
:::: l:::] [::
\
\
II
~ ~
~I;';
- - - - - - - - - - ~];;;,,;-w:: - - ~- - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-------------------------------------
ovo~ NOlSDN,^I-,
O.,.OOl NOls.:lNiAn
,"'''OS''3 'Wdi
/
-
~
~
(3
i~ (
> I ~~ I~I U
[i ~--
I ill
E
-~
111
~~
-~
z
.,
~ ~'i
5~
~g:
ot ~~
co ~~~
~5~
~ ~
_Z
NW
o
...J
o
C>
~"'~n01i~l
QWNJ'1noB
~
t1g;
t---z
00
w-
-,:;:
00
lI:O
lL...J
o
~~ Qj
'"';;;
~~~
~~~
~ u"l
~
~
9l-3.L.....L8~1
il-3..1.v.unS.l.H1
~
~/
9 ~~ 0 ~
~ ~a :
~~
z
g
'"
~~~ ~ ~
=i ~ ~~
~! H O~
Ht.~~) ~I e~~'"
OVQtiElHrTYld-.ll:fClcAtY >
:!;
g~~ ~
5~
;; ~~
, .
~~
"r
~
i~
a...
<i
00:-
1".",
l.JJ
1-.
(/)1
(1)1
UJ,
-II
CL.I
<I
%1
~I
~I
~I
a..
<(
~
z
o
~
u
o
...J
Agenda Item No. 16A10
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve a refund of the $1,000 continuance fees paid by Tabernacle of
Bethlehem Church for Petitions CU-2003-AR-4326 and V A-2003-AR-4327, Dieudonne and
Lunie Brutus, petitioners, represented by Ronald F. Nino, AICP, of Vanasse Daylor when the
petition was continued by the petitioners from a March 8, 2005 Board of County Commissioners
hearing date to March 22, 2005
OBJECTIVE:
That the Board of County COI11I11' sSloners determine whether granting a refund to the petitioners is in
the best interest of Collier County
CONSIDERA TIONS:
Resolution 2005-119 establishes the Collier County Community Development and Environmental
Services Fee Schedule. Section K. 30) of that fee schedule sets forth a Land Use Petition Continuance
fee of $500 for an advertised petition. Section QQ) I) of that fee schedule states that requests for fee
waivers may only be approved by the Board of County Commissioners.
The petitioners' two petitions, CU-2003-AR-4326 and V A-2003-AR-4327, seeking conditional use
and variance approvals for a church on 3rd Street in Immokalee, had been advertised for the March 8,
2005 Board of County Commissioners meeting. Upon hearing that there would only be four Board
members present at the March 8, 2005 hearing, the petitioners sought a continuance to March 22,
2005; a date when all five Board members would attend. A continuance fee of $500 for each petition
was paid by the petitioners to Collier County. The petitioners are seeking a refund of the $1,000.00
continuance fee because the petitions were continued to ensure the petition would have the benefit of a
full Board's consideration.
In a letter dated March 24, 2005, the petitioners' agent states, "the applicant is a non-profit
organization and [it] has extremely limited financial resources that it needs to conserve to build its
church in lmmokalee."
FISCAL IMPACT:
The continuance fee was paid to offset CDES staff time spent updating documents and coordinating
with other county staff members regarding the continuance. The refund, if granted by the Board,
would be taken from Fund 13].
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT:
The Gmwth Management Plan (GMP) does not address a refund of the requested continuance, thus no
impact to the GMP is anticipated.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This fee waiver request, in the form of a refund request, is consistent with the prOVISIOns and
G:ICurrent\EXECUTIVE SUMMARIESIBCC May 2005\May 10lTabernacle of Bethlehem refund requestdoc
Page 1 of 2
Aqenda Item No. 16A10
" May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 6
guidelines of Resolution 2005-119, the Collier County Community Development and Environmental
Services Fee Schedule, which provides for fee waiver requests to be addressed by the Board of County
Commissioners.
RECOMMENDA TION:
Staff believes the fact that a Board with only four members may have placed the petitioners' need for a
super-majority for the Conditional Use petition in question. and that fact may be viewed as extenuating
circumstances and approval of the refund may therej~)re be appropriate: however, the decision is up to
the B,;urd of County C()mmission~'rs,
PREPARFD B\':
Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner
Department of Zoning & Land Development Review
-
"-'
G:\Current\EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES\BCC May 2005\May 10\Tabernacle of Bethlehem refund request.doc
Page 2of2
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
,;genda Itern No, 16A10
Mav 10. 2005
Page 3 of 6
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
161\10
Recon'n1endatloll to approve a refund of the $1,000 cont!:1uance feas paid by TabernaciE:
of Bethlehem Church for Petitions CLJ-2003-AR-4325 and VA-2003NAR-4327.0ieudonne
ar'o Lurlle Bruh..lS, petitioners, represented by Ronald F, Nino, AICP, of Vanasse Daylor
vI/hen the petition '.vas COnllnlied by th~ petHiorler from a March 8 2005 Board at County
CommIssioners heanng date to t'.~arcq 22, 2005
5/10/2005 9: DC 00 At,A
Kay Desele!'fI, AiCP
Principal Planner
4!1812005 9:47:00 AM
Prepared By
Community Development 8-
Er1VirOl101er1tal Servtces
Date
:L'aning &. La.nd Dev'l'loprnent Rl?:Vll~W
SJndra Lc<.:
: }~e,";U'":l(!cret~.. n'
L<nf.:
Approved B~
c.ommiJi:;::\
E!>viron:n€'rn;~; .:.-<
4'j 8/20C
i:} ~'i
,;1 v:!'on r,)!':'n::~1
~,J.mtt'
Constanc~ A. JohnSl'Ill
Openltlons Analyst
Date
Appruved B~
Community Deve10pment So-
Environmental Servlces
Community Developmenf &
Envlfonmental Services Admin.
,irlSIZUU5 4:24 PM
Ray 8e!iows
Chief Planner
Date
Approved By
Community Development 8.
Environmental Ser...ices.
Zoning & Land Development Revtew
412512UU5 S:15 AM
Susan Murray, AICP
Zoning &. Land Development Direc.tor
Date
Approved By
Community Devetopment &.
Environmental Services
Zoning & Land Develop~n~mt Review
4/2612005 11 :03 AM
Denton Baker
Financial Admin ,& Housing Director
D<.ste
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Financial Admin. & Housing
4.126/200511:17 AM
Date
Approved By
Jos.eph K, Schmrtl
Comrnunity Development &.
EnvironrnE:ntal Services
Community Devek'l,ment &
Environmental Services. Adminstr.ltpr
Commllnity Deveiopment &.
Environmental Services Admin.
412612005 1 :46 PM
As.sistant County Attorney
Date
A pproved By
P.1trick G. Whit€
County Attorney
County Attorn~y Office
4/28/2005 2:29 PM
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
D...te
Approved By
County Manager's. Offu";e
Office of Management & 8lldget
4128120054:15 PM
Mark Isackson
Budget Analyst
Date
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Off1ce Df Management & BlIdget
4t29f2005 10:25 AM
Michael Smykowski
M;m3gement & Budget Director
Date
Approved By
County Marmgcr's Office
Office of Management & 8udget
4/29I2U0511:57 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioner!;
COlJnty Manager
Date
Ctllmty Manager's Office
4{29/201)5 5: 24 PM
........
March 24, 2005
REceNEO COUNTY ~GER ~
~/-Z,>( ~/ ~
,,-
MAR '-.:J iUuJ
~~,...
.5:t~ ~~'I'~/
p~ ~~ "" ~ / Civil Engineering
P<- ~ Q:>.I~a?o-c.-.,~ .
~ ~~. _ , ~Trarfic Enginmwf
~L.-S ?--~ Environment,' S:IP~"
Agenda Item No, 16A 10
MaY1~
Vanasse-~
Daylor ~
Mr. James Mudd
County Manager
Collier County Government
3301 Tamiami Trl E
Naples, Florida 34112
ACTION
Fl.E
Urban Planning
landl<ape Architecture
j,:' Reauest k: ; ,~fund (" ,n~" .:20. :;1" ~or~jnuan::::e j:;'e~ for the -.lbemacl':' ofBett:1eh,~m'l;:
Ch~r~h neart OL lvi~:'(i.:. 2~. ~\Y.)5
Dear Mr. Mudd
On behalf of Pastor Dieudonne Brutus, we have been asked to request a refund of the fee
the church paid to the Collier County Board of Commissioners resulting from our
continuing the public hearing scheduled for March 8, 2005. The amount of the fee was
$1,000 for two concurrent petitions.
We request the refund because the reason we had to ask for the continuance was not
entirely of our own doing. We learned that the BCC were not going to have all of its
members present at the meeting of March 8. The super majority approval requirement
gives every applicant cause for concern because one vote in opposition when only four
members are present means the petition is denied. We could not afford to risk that
situation and consequently we had to request the continuance for two weeks when we
understood the five members would be present.
Additionally, we would have you appreciate that the applicant is a no'n-profit
organization and has extremely limited financial resources that it needs to conserve to
build its church in Immokalee. All of its members are economically disadvantaged, which
only compounds the problem of funding the requirements for establishing the church.
We pray you can find in your hearts to refund the continuance application fee of $1 ,000
to t;abernac1e of Bethlehem, P.O.Box 3085, Immokalee, Florida, 34143-3085
Si~"'e\a
V:t\\Jlor, LLP
~nald'~p
Senior Planner
cc. Dieudonne Brutus
~~lIW~~
~ MAR 292005~
COMMtHTY OBtElOPMENT
Docamenf1
12730 New Brittany Boulevard, Suite 600, Fort Myers, Florida 33907 T 239,437.4601 F 239.437.4636 w vanday.com
Agenda Item No, 16A 10
May 10,2005
Page 5 of 6
Official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners
CDPR 1103 - Official Receipt
Trans Number
! 552777
Date
3/18/2005 10:52:04 AM
Post Date
3/18/2005
Nbr
Appi Name: VANASSE DAYLOR
App: '?'.ags!S;atus: REVIEV\ STfl,2:: N::. 3/PENJlt\)(?
Address ;:::::')i~A.LD 1\jINC l.<:;:::: " 2730 NEW BRi-;--;- :':Ny 8:...\10., #600 FT. MYERS FL 3390"'
Proj Nams TABERI\jACL~ .y: S:::THLEHEM ,
Type: CH TAZ: 0
Subdiv Nbr: 100
Project Nbr: 2002060036
Payor: TABERNACLE OF BETHLEHEM
Fee Information
Oeseri tion GL Account
LAND USE PETITION CONTINUANCE 13113832634127600000
Total
Amount Waived
$500.00
$500.00 ,
Payments
Total Cash
Total Non-Cash
Amount
$500.00
$0.00 I
$500.00
Pa ment Code
CHECK
Account/Check Number
1258
$500.00 I
Total Paid
Memo:
Cashier/location: MCCAULEYKA TY 1 1
User: MARTIN_C
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT
Printed:3/18/2005 10:52:37 AM
Agenda Item No. 16A10
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 6
Official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners
CDPR1103 . Official Receipt
Trans Number
552778
Date
,3/18/200510:52:41 AM
Post Date
3/18/2005
Nbr
i
J
Appl Name: VANASSE DAYLOR
,A,or:: Stage'Status: REV!E\",' ::TAGE fn. 3!PE';:::,:t'i"?
Address: F=n-.J.A\L~' ~', h!hJ-:;,J:...lCF ~.:~3C' t'~=v-; ~=-,.:-~,-/<\" ~,_\/: ---- ~v';~"=~~: FL ~:~.i?~,-
Proj I"ame, TA8::i=\I~A:::;L:: Or BETrL.::rl::l\!.
Type: CH TAZ: 0
Subdiv Nbr: 100
Project Nbr: 2002060036
Payor: TABERNACLE OF BETHLEHEM
Fee Information
Descri tion GL Account
LAND USE PETITION CONTINUANCE' 13113832634127600000
Total
Amount Waived
$500.00
$500,00
Payments
Pa ment Code
CHECK
Account/Check Number
1258
Total Cash
Total Non-Cash
Amount
$500.00
$0,00 I
$500.00
$500.00 i
Total Paid
Memo:
Cashier/location: MCCAULEYKATY 1
User: MARTIN_C
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT
Printed:3/18/2005 10:53: 12 AM
Agenda Item No. 16A 11
May 10, 2005
Paqe 1 of 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of "II Regalo", approval of the
standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of
the performance security
OBJECTIVE:
To approve for recording the final pat of "II Regale" 2 subdivision of lands located in Section 2,
Townshi:: 49 SCJuF"! R.2'lge 2: =ast. Collie" CO~'~i:; ::-::naa followi~i; the alternative pro:edure
for approval of SUOOIVISlon plats pursuant to Resolution 99-199.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the construction drawings,
specifications, and final plat of "II Regalo". These documents are in compliance with the County
Land Development Code and Florida State Statute No, 177. All fees have been paid. Security
in the amount of 10% of the total cost of the required improvements, and 100% of the cost of
any remaining improvements, together with a Construction and Maintenance Agreement for
Subdivision Improvements, shall be provided and accepted by the Engineering Services
Director and the County Attorney's office prior to the recording of the final plat. This would be in
conformance with the County Land Development Code -- Section 10.02.04.
,-
Engineering Services Department recommends that the final plat of "II Regalo" be approved for
recording.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project cost is $437,994.67 (estimated) to be borne by the
developer.
The cost breakdown is as follows:
a)
b)
Water & Sewer
Drainage,
Paving, Grading
- $172,640.00
- $265,354.67
The Security amount, equal to 110% of the
project cost, is $481,794.14
The County will realize revenues as follows:
.-'-
Fund: Community Development Fund 131
Agency: County Manager
Cost Center: 138327 -- Engineering Project Review
Revenue generated by this project:
Total: $14,199.84
-'
'-"
Agenda Itern No, 16A11
May 10, 2005
Fees are based on a construction estimate of $437,994.67 and were paidf1fl(JG 2 of 4
August, 2004,
The breakdown is as follows:
a) Plat Review Fee ($1,000.00 + $5.1ac) -$1,060.00
b) Construction Drawing Review Fee
Water &
Sewer (.75% const. est) - $1,294.80
c) Drainage,
Paving, Grading (,75% const. est.) - $1,990,16
d) Construction inspection Fee
Water g
e)
Sew,=:' :.=,,25% ::;:>nst. est;
Drainage, Paving,
Grading(2.25%const. est.)
- $3,884.40
- $5,970.48
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
The developer must receive a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities prior to the issuance of
the construction plan final approval letter.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
There are no outstanding environmental issues,
HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
There are no historical or archaeological impacts. If during the course of site clearing,
excavation or other construction activity, a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all
development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be
immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted.
lEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the plat and associated legal
documents.
RECOMMENDA TION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Final Plat of "II Regalo" for recording
with the following stipulations:
1. Approve the amount of $481,794.14 as performance security for the required improvements;
or such lesser amount based on work completed, and as is approved by the Engineering
Services Department.
2, Approve the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement, and
a. That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the required improvements have
received preliminary acceptance,
b. That the plat not be recorded until suitable security and an appropriate Construction
and Maintenance Agreement is approved and accepted by the Engineering Services
Department Director and the County Attorney's office.
PREPARED BY: John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Department
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
',genda Itern No, 16,1\11
May 10. 2005
Page 3 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16A11
ReC:Qlnmenaation to appwve tor recording the final plat of "Ii Regalo", approval of the
standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount Of
the performance security.
5J10/20Cb 9:0C 00 At./'
Prepared By
Senior Engmeer
.1/27120058:47,33 AM
John HouldswotiJ1
Communlty Development &
Environmental Servicl's
Date
Engineering Services
nlorn<:IS E Kuck, P.E
CDES EnglrH.'",rrng SPrv~:'::-I':;; Dlrector
Date
Approved B~'
;':'p'-,,'f';':',' !Y'en~
"Fl','!" l!'
ConSl,' ner_ .4. ,)r:>hn::;lll'i
Community De':elopment &.
Environrnent.tll Services
CD!::::; Engi\1eenrj~! S",,'.,
4.':7.:"'-
UrH!r<l!bon!> Analyst
D:HI>
Com!nUf'Hty Devp.lopment 8.
Environnwnt<.l! Servlc,es Admin.
4i27/2:005 9:2G AM
Sandra Lea
Executive Secr~ta ty
D.1.te
Approved By
CDmmunlty Deveiopment &.
Enviromrumta~ Services
CommUnlty Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4/2712005 9;30 AM
Date
Approved By
Jo~epll K Schmitt
Comrnunity Development &
Environment..l Servicer,
Community Development &
E.nvironmental Services Admif1strator
Community Developrnent &
Environmental Services Admi"
4/28/20054:01 PM
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
Approved By
County ManLlger's Office
Office of MUfwgement & Budget
4/29/20057:51 AM
Mark IS.lck5.on
Budget Analyst
Date
Approved By
Coumy Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/2912005 3:52 PM
Approved By
Michael Srnykowski
County M.mager's Office
Man<Jgcment & Budget Director
D~tt.'
Office of M:afw,gement & Blldget
5/1.120D5 4:14 PM
County Manager
Date
Appro,'ed By
James V. Mudd
Board ()f County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
5/2/2005 12:2"1 PM
J
/ ~ ~I
<:)
- ll:!'
dl
I
!" ~
~I.!)",
~o_
<00
(j)C'-J",
~OOJ
o~ OJ
Z >. m
mD...
E~
2
1
I" ." ovo' IN"'n'-"o"~
Z
o
~~
000
o
..J
I-I
I ~ I
I ;
m
'D
c:
OJ
OJ
<
1 "i"(r\ 011 I i I : ~\
~
i'----i
~II
\~~\:~ <'/~-;:
.-'--',
i~lfl
I' ~g
"
5:S
I ~~:
I I i
d
i5 lINn
5;lIYlS3 .11'1'0 NJ0100
(I~O:
SOt:f',,]Nl".
(l~)
SQ/jyJ.3N....
!l6 liNn
S3JVlS] 3.lvtl NJcnlX)
en; ;-~~~ ~~ i 1 ~~ I ~_'li
s~~::l ~~\~~'" ~'"
~~~!" ~ ~' +1
~, 1<.-
~ ~~ g~!
~~ i i
~
ll~)
NV:J11:;d
LMNGSTON ROAD
~~~ ~
a..
<{
~
Z
~ 0
-
t-
<{
U
0
-I
::::
~
~:W~
<<"
uwW
i Il'
:: ~~i 'i
g~ ~ iI5'~I~ w
~ ~Ir-;", ~
~ ?_~p_ o:"'~: "'''''' ~ ",el
~~:: ~"'::I ~~SV;;;lN5
~~ ~.ft: ;~ ~
tI.;;l.~ \
~~5 ~~~
0";'"
Z Z2
~~~ ~
~i
[~.. 's'n) lM:iJ.IWWW'J.
fl ~ ~
'>~
~~~.
~
~
a.. 1
<{I
~
fI/:_
i.J...l
I-i
-I
(/)1
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 43
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the Release and Satisfaction of Lien for the following
cases: Gladys Rodriquez, 2000-027; Helen Stormer, 2004-71; Keith T. Heckman,
2004-074; Barbara Galloway, 2003-035; Barbara Galloway, 2002-393; Barbara
Galloway, 99-029; Barbara Galloway, 2002-394; Barbara Galloway, 2003-385;
Barbara Galloway, 2003-445; Erik H. & Astrid V. Seffer, 2581; Steve Riambau &
Gildete Dasilva, 2567; Olga Hirshhorn & Thomas G. Schessler, 2223; Olga
Hirshhorn & Thomas G. Schessler, 2351; Aurora Bros., 1917; Aurora Bros., 2275;
Douglas & Sandra Carter, 40328-018; Aurora Bros., 2383; Douglas & Sandra
Carter, 2011; Douglas & Sandra Carter, 2121; Douglas & Sandra Carter, 1919;
Douglas & Sandra Carter, 1885; Bayshore Land Development LLC, 2556; Felix
Lerch Family Trust, 70915-021; Felix Lerch Family Trust, 1674; Felix Lerch Family
Trust, 1540; John D. Endres, 2453; Salvatore & Antionette Cavataio, 2590;
Salvatore & Antionette Cavataio, 2535; Gary Rookstool & Eleanor Porras, 1761;
Gary Rookstool & Eleanor Porras, 51130-049; Caspian Builders, LLC, 2231/2350;
William D. Collins, III, Trustee, ITF Florida Sunbelt Mortgage Co., 90-05-02297;
Kelly Condon, 2413; William Mae Postelle, 2000-315; William Mae Po stelle, 98-410;
Rene Damphier, SO 134810; Joseph Harrington, CO 2004091215; Michael Ryon,
CO 2004081106; Amber-Lou Investments Co., CO 2004100765
-
OBJECTIVE:
To approve execution and recording of the Release and Satisfactions of Lien
acknowledging compliance and recovery of fines and fees related to prosecution of Code
Enforcement matters.
CONSIDERATIONS:
-'
Case No. Owner of Record Lien Amount
2000-027 Gladys Rodriquez $10,000.00
2004-71 Helen Stormer $647.77
2004-074 Keith T. Heckman $372.96
2581 Erik H. & Astrid V. Seffer $255.00
2567 Steve Riambau & Gildete Dasilva $585.00
2223 Olga Hirshhorn & Thomas G. $625.00
Schessler
2351 Olga Hirshhorn & Thomas G. $415.00
Schessler
1917 Aurora Bros $255.00
2275 Aurora Bros $260.00
40328-018 Douglas & Sandra Carter $280.00
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 43
,"""
2383 Aurora Bros $255.00
2011 Douglas & Sandra Carter $255.00
2121 Douglas & Sandra Carter $255.00
1919 Douglas & Sandra Carter $310.00
1885 Douglas & Sandra Carter $380.00
2556 Bayshore Land Development $2,400.00
70915-021 Felix Lerch Family Trust $600.00
1674 Felix Lerch Family Trust $245.00
1540 Felix Lerch Family Trust $340.00
2453 John D. Endres $255.00
2590 Salvatore & Antionette Cavataio $255.00
2535 Salvatore & Antionette Cavataio $255.00
1761 Gary Rookstool & Eleanor Porras $1,800.00
51130-049 Gary Rookstool & Eleanor Porras $498.00
2231/2350 Caspian Builders, LLC $675.00
90-05-02297 William D. Collins, III, ITF Florida $240.00
Sun belt Mort2a2e Co.
2413 Kelly Condon $255.00
2000-315 William Mae Postelle % G Jean $1,050.00
Canty
98-410 William Mae Postelle % G Jean $245.00
Can tv
SO 134810 Rene Damphier $285.31
CO 2004091215 Joseph Harrington $118.30
CO 2004081106 Michael Ryon $169.78
CO 2004100765 Amber-Lou Investments Co. $231.39
99-029 Barbara Galloway $20,000.00
2002-393 (Global settlement on an liens as part
2002-394 of a purchase of the property. The
2003-035 liens are settled only as to the
-.'
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 43
2003-385
2003-445
property itself. The liens remain
viable against any other property
owned in Collier County by Ms.
Galloway, and against all her
ersonal ro er .
TOTAL RECEIVED
45,068.51
FISCAL IMPACT: A total of$45,068.51 has been collected to satisfy these cases. The
only expense incurred by the County is the cost of recording the Release and
Satisfactions, which is estimated to be approximately $10.00 per lien, totaling $390.00
which is budgeted and available in the current fiscal year Code Enforcement budget.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This request will have no impact on the
County's Growth Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the
Release and Satisfactions of Lien.
PREPARED BY: Janet Powers, Operations Manager
Code Enforcement
,-'
-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Approved By
Michelle Edwards Arnold
Agenda Itern No, 16M2
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 43
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16A12
Recommendation to approve the Release and Satisfaction of Lien for the following cases
Gladys Rodnquez, 2000,027: Helen Stormer. 2004,71: Keith T Heckman. 2004,074;
Barbara Galloway, 2003,035; Barbara Galloway, 2002-393; Barbara Galloway. 99,029;
Barbara Galloway, 2002,394 Barbara Galloway, 2003,385; Barbara Galloway, 2003-445:
Erik H. & Astnd V Serter, 2581: Steve Rlambau & Gildele Dasilva, 2567; Olga Hifshhorn &
Thomas G Schessler. 2223: Olga Hirsllhorn & Thomas G. Schessler, 2351: Aurora Bros..
1917 Aurora Bros, 2275; Douglas & Sandra Carter. 40328,018 Aurora Bros, 2383
Douglas & Sandra Carter, 2011; Douglas & Sandra Carter, 2121; Douglas & Sandra
Carter, 1919: Douglas & Sandra Cartar, 1885: Bayshore Land Developmenl LLC 2556
FelIX Lerch Family Trust. 70915,021, Felix Lerch Family Trusl, 1674: Felix Larch Family
Trust 1540; John D, Endres, 2453: Salvatore & Anllollette CavataiO, 2590, Salvatore &
Antionette CavataIo. 2535: Gary Rookstool & Eleanor Porras, 1761: Gary Rookstool &
Eleanor Porras, 51130,049: Caspian Bu,lders, LLC, 2231/2350: William 0, Collins. III,
Trustee. ITF Flonda Sunbell Mortgage Co, 90-05,02297; Kelly Condon, 2413; William Mae
Postelle, 2000,315; William Mae Postelle, 98-410, Rene Damphler SO 134810 Joseph
Harflngton, CO 2004091215; M,chael Ryon, CO 20040B11 06: Amber,Lou Investments
Co , CO 2004100765
5/10/20059 00:00 AM
Code Enforcement Director
Date
CommunIty Development &
Environmental Services
Code Enforcement
5/2/20055:02 PM
Sandra Lea
Executive Secretary
Date
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
Community Development &
Environmental Services
5/3/20058:37 AM
Constance A. Johnson
Date
Approved By
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
Community Development &
Environmental Services
513/20059: 19 AM
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Environmental Services Adminstrator
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services. Admin.
Approved By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
5/3/2005 8:42 PM
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Marluger's Office
Office of Management & Budget
514/20059:48 AM
Janet Powers
Operations Manager
Date
Approved By
Approved By
Comrnurlity Developrnent &
Environmental Services
Code Enforcement
5/4/2005 3:06 PM
James V, Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Cornmissioners
County Manager's Office
5/4/20054:23 PM
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 N, Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34112
(239) 403-2440
RELEASE AND SA TISF ACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Code Enforcement Board
Order dated November 1, 2000, a certified copy of which was recorded in O.R. Book
3140 Pages 2833, et seq., on October 29, 2002, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, formerly owned by Gladys
Rodriguez, a single woman, has been discharged in full.
The real property located at 2753 Van Buren Avenue, Naples, Florida,
more specifically described in the deed recorded in Official Record Book
3236, Pages 3091 et seq., of the Public Records of Collier County.
Folio No. 29281160009
Cost: $10,000.00
Reference: CEB No. 2000-027
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, formerly owned by Gladys Rodriguez, a single
woman, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. With respect to any other
property owned by Gladys Rodriguez, the lien remains in full force and effect.
Dated this
day of
,2005,
A TrEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
, Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno. Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples. Florida 34112
(239) 403-2440
RELEASE AND SA TISF ACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that any claim of lien arising out of the Code Enforcement Board
Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order of the Board dated February 25,
2005, a certified copy of which was recorded in O.R. Book 3744, Pages 1403, et seq., on
March 3, 2005, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following
described real property, and all other real and personal property located in Collier County,
owned by Helen Stormer, has been discharged in full.
The real property located at 3935 24th Avenue SE, Naples, Florida, more
specifically described in the deed recorded in Official Record Book 3342,
Pages 0366, et seq., of the Public Records of Collier County.
Folio No. 412278800004
Cost: $647.77
Reference: CEB No. 2004-71
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release any and all liens arising from
this Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order of the Board as to the whole of
the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Helen
Stormer, and consents to such liens being discharged of record.
Dated this
day of
,2005.
AITEST:
DWIGlIT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COll1ER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
, Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 N, Horseshoe Drive
Naples. Florida 34112
(239) 403-2440
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Code Enforcement Board
Order dated February 2, 2005, a certified copy of which was recorded in O.R. Book 3730,
Pages 2007, et seq., on February 8, 2005, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal
property located in Collier County, owned by Keith T. Heckman has been discharged in
full.
The real property located at 905 Alachua Street, Immokalee, Florida, more
specifically described in the deed recorded in Official Record Book 2281,
Pages 1081, et seq., of the Public Records of Collier County.
Folio No. 63865080008
Cost: $372.96
Reference: CEB No. 2004-074
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by
Keith T. Heckman, and consents to this lien being discharged of record.
Dated this
day of
,2005.
A TIEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLlER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
, Deputy Clerk
By:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
latzkow
\ unty Attorney
.J
Agenda Item No, 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 43
'This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34112
(239) 403-2440
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Code Enforcement Board
Order dated December 15, 2003, a certified copy of which was recorded in O.R. Book
3467, Pages 3325, et seq., on December 19, 2003, of the Public Records of Collier
County, Florida, against the following described real property, formerly owned by
Barbara L. Galloway, a single person, has been discharged in full.
The real property located at 939 Church Street, Copeland, Florida, more
specifically described in the deed recorded in Official Record Book 1804,
Pages 2250 et seq., of the Public Records of Collier County.
Folio No. 01131800000
Reference: CEB No. 2003-035
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, formerly owned by Barbara L. Galloway, a single
person, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. With respect to any other
property owned by Barbara L. Galloway, the lien remains in full force and effect.
Dated this
day of
,2005.
ArrEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COlLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
, Deputy Clerk
By:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
By:
form and
cy:
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno. Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples. Aorida 34112
(239) 403-2440
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Board of County
Commissioners Resolution 2002-393 and Legal Notice of Assessment of Lien dated
September 24,2002, as recorded in O.R. Book 3131, Pages 2316, et seq., on October 15,
2002, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described
real property, formerly owned by Barbara L. Galloway, a single person, has been
discharged in full.
The real property located at 939 Church Street, Copeland, Florida, more
specifically described in the deed recorded in Official Record Book 1804,
Pages 2250 et seq., of the Public Records of Collier County.
Folio No. 0113180??oo
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, formerly owned by Barbara L. Galloway, a single
person, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. With respect to any other.
property owned by Barbara L. Galloway, the lien remains in full force and effect. , '
Dated this
day of
,2005.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
, Deputy Clerk
By:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 43
'This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34112
(239) 403-2440
RELEASE AND SA TISF ACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Code Enforcement Board Order
dated June 9, 1999, as recorded in O,R. Book 2601, Pages 2646, et seq., on October 14, 1999,
of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property,
formerly owned by Barbara L. Galloway, a single person, has been discharged in full.
The real property located at 939 Church Street, Copeland, Florida, more
specifically described in the deed recorded in Official Record Book 1804, Pages
2250 et seq., of the Public Records of Collier County.
Folio No, 01131800000
Reference: CEB No. 99-029
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the
above-described real property, formerly owned by Barbara L. Galloway, a single person, and
consents to this lien being discharged of record. With respect to any other property owned
by Barbara L. Galloway, the lien remains in full force and effect.
Dated this
day of
,2005.
AITEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUlER COUNTY, FLORIDA
, Deputy Clerk
By:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
By:
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 N, Horseshoe Drive
Naples. Florida 34112
(239) 403-2440
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Board of County
Commissioners Resolution 2002-394 and Legal Notice of Assessment of Lien dated
September 24,2002, as recorded in O.R. Book 3131, Pages 2318, et seq., on October 15,
2002, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described
real property, formerly owned by Barbara L. Galloway, a single person, has been
discharged in full.
The real property located at 939 Church Street, Copeland, Florida, more
specifically described in the deed recorded in Official Record Book 1804,
Pages 2250 et seq., of the Public Records of Collier County.
Folio No. 0113180??oo
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, formerly owned by Barbara L. Galloway, a single
person, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. With respect to any other
property owned by Barbara L. Galloway, the lien remains in full force and effect.
Dated this
day of
,2005.
AITEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
, Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
legal
Agenda Item No, 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 43
TIris instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno. Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples. Florida 34112
(239) 403-2440
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Board of County
Commissioners Resolution 2003-385 and Legal Notice of Assessment of Lien dated
November 18, 2003, as recorded in O.R. Book 3462, Pages 1607, et seq., on December 12,
2003, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real
property, formerly owned by Barbara L. Galloway, a single person, has been discharged in
full.
The real property located at 939 Church Street, Copeland, Florida, more
specifically described in the deed recorded in Official Record Book 1804,
Pages 2250 et seq., of the Public Records of Collier County.
Folio No. 01131800000
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of
the above-described real property, formerly owned by Barbara L. Galloway, a single person,
and consents to this lien being discharged of record. With respect to any other property
owned by Barbara L. Galloway, the'lien remains in full force and effect.
Dated this
day of
,2005.
ATTEST:
DWIGIIT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COlliER COUNTy, FLORIDA
, Deputy Clerk
By:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
By:
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 13 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34112
(239) 403-2440
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LffiN
This is to certify that the claim of lien arising out of the Board of County
Commissioners Resolution 2003-445 and Legal Notice of Assessment of Lien dated
December 16, 2003, as recorded in O.R. Book 3480, Pages 1635, et seq., on January 8,
2004, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described
real property, formerly owned by Barbara L. Galloway, a single person, has been
discharged in full.
The real property located at 939 Church Street, Copeland, Florida, more
specifically described in the deed recorded in Official Record Book 1804,
Pages 2250 et seq., of the Public Records of Collier County.
Folio No. 0113180??oo
The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole
of the above-described real property, formerly owned by Barbara L. Galloway, a single
person, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. With respect to any other
property owned by Barbara L. Galloway, the lien remains in full force and effect.
Dated this
day of
, 2005.
ATTEST:
DWIGlIT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COlLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
, Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
;."~<.II//lI~''';_>!IoIolIi~I_"_''''.'''''";''"'''''i'""""",""<""",,,,,,
~:ii'~";"';,~~,M'q,i..i:""."i;;;;':;;:>:,"":',,h',:,:,,;
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2005-57 against:
ERIK H. AND ASTRID V. SEFFER
The lien was recorded on 2/18/2005, Official Record Book 3737 Page(s) 0815, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred Fifty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Real Property located at 3153 42nd Street SW, Naples, Fl
Cost $255 Reference: 2581
Folio: 36515120009
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of I 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
I~~
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 15 of43
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2005-60 against:
STEVE RIAMBAU AND GILDETE DASILVA
The lien was recorded on 2/18/2005, Official Record Book 3737 Page(s) 0821, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Five Hundred Eighty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and
imposes certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which
property is described as follows:
Real property located at 1141 S. Alhambra Circle, Naples, FL
Cost: $585 Reference: 2567
Folio: 63452600008
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005,
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
-- ~
Thomas~~er
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF UEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2003-102 against:
OLGA HIRSHHORN & THOMAS G. SCHESSLER
The lien was recorded on 4/03/2003, Official Record Book 3256 Page(s) 1222, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Six Hundred Twenty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and
imposes certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which
property is described as follows:
Section 12 Township 51 South, Range 26 East
Cost: $625.00
Reference: 2223
Folio: 00738160005
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
IO~~
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
"We
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2003-431 against:
OLGA HIRSHHORN & THOMAS G. SCHESSLER
The lien was recorded on 110812004, Official Record Book 3480 Page(s) 1605, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Four Hundred Fifteen Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Section 12 Township 51 South, Range 26 East
Cost: $415,00
Reference: 2351
Folio: 00738160005
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
10~~
Thomas . Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
""'I/lI~",'~i_;,,,,,,,I"',,~,,jO~ih,,b,"I,,",,_j.,,,,,,;_..:,;;,,,,.,
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2001-427 against:
AURORA BRaS
The lien was recorded on 12/05/01, Official Record Book 2937 Page(s) 0011, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred Fifty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Lot 17 Blk 13, Naples Manor Addition, Plat Book 3, Pages 67-68
Cost: $255.00
Reference: 1917
Folio: 62102040003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of 1 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT Eo BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
10~~
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
,:y
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10,2005
Page 19 of 43
SATISFACTION OF UEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2003-286 against:
AURORA BROS
The lien was recorded on 9/15/2003, Official Record Book 3396 Page(s} 2766, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred Sixty Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Lot 17 Blk 13, Naples Manor Addition, Plat Book 3, Pages 67-68
Cost: $260.00
Reference: 2275
Folio: 62102040003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chainnan
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
,JIA"'-'-~.
~'~""c J
\ Ov,.,
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
\i .
~ ~~
".1 ~.
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF UEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 94-667 against:
DOUGLAS & SANDRA CARTER
The lien was recorded on 10/14/1994, Official Record Book 1994 Page(s) 0111, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred Eighty Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Lot 26 Block 11, Naples Manor Lakes, Plat Book 3 Pages 86-87
Cost: $280 Reference: 40328-018
Folio: 62260760005
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
16LM ~
Thomas C. Pa)me
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 43
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2003-432 against:
AURORA BROS
The lien was recorded on 1/08/2004, Official Record Book 3480 Page(s) 1611, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred Fifty Five, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain
obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property is
described as follows:
Lot 17 Blk 13, Naples Manor Addition, Plat Book 3, Pages 67-68
Cost: $255.00
Reference: 2383
Folio: 62102040003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of t 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Deputy Clerk
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
- ilL
~ ~ LI\o t-v__________-
Thomas . Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 22 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2002-62 against:
DOUGLAS & SANDRA CARTER
The lien was recorded on 3/06/2002, Official Record Book 2993 Page(s) 3086, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred Fifty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Lot 26 Block 11, Naples Manor Lakes, Plat Book 3 pages 86-87
Cost: $255 Reference: 2011
Folio: 62260720003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of 1 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
IOW\ PJ~
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 23 of 43
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2002-229 against:
DOUGLAS & SANDRA CARTER
The lien was recorded on 6/1912002, Official Record Book 3058 Page(s) 0568, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred Fifty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Lot 26 Block 11, Naples Manor Lakes, Plat Book 3 pages 86-87
Cost: $255 Reference: 2121
Folio: 62260720003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chainnan
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to fonn and legal sufficiency
fO~ nj~
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 24 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2001-429 against:
DOUGLAS & SANDRA CARTER
The lien was recorded on 12/05/2001, Official Record Book 2937 Page(s) 0015, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Three Hundred Ten Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Lots 28 and 29, Block 11, Naples Manor Lakes, Plat Book 3 pages 86-87
Cost: $310.00
Reference: 1919
Folio: 62260800004
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida. to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman. directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
1b~ ~)~
Thomas . Palm r
Assistant County Attorney
hi{H:;,:,;:,;;kA"',,';':;<~:~;;;;;"'::" .;
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No, 16A12
May 10,2005
Page 25 of 43
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2001-386 against:
DOUGLAS & SANDRA CARTER
The lien was recorded on 10/31/2001, Official Record Book 2916 Page(s) 2703, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Three Hundred Eighty Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Lot 26 Block 11, Naples Manor Lakes, Plat Book 3 pages 86-87
Cost: $380 Reference: 1885
Folio: 62260720003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Deputy Clerk
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
..--,., {1 i
! VI'\y, ~iA/L~L.-'--d/
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 26 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2005-20 against:
BA YSHORE LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC
The lien was recorded on 2/04/2005, Official Record Book 3728 Page(s) 2436, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Thousand Four Hundred Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and
imposes certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which
property is described as follows:
Lot 6, Linda Park, Plat Book 4 Page 19
Cost: $2400.00
Reference: 2556
Folio: 55700240005
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
IPW\ rJ~
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 27 of 43
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 98-141 against:
FELIX LERCH FAMILY TRUST
The lien was recorded on 6/22/1998, Official Record Book 2432 Page(s) 2510, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Six Hundred Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain
obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property is
described as follows:
Lot 17 Blk 13, Naples Manor Addition, Plat Book 3, Pages 67-68
Cost: $600 Reference: 70915-021
Folio: 62102040003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
T~~
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No, 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 28 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2001-101 against:
FELIX LERCH FAMILY TRUST
The lien was recorded on 5/0212001, Official Record Book 2817 Page(s) 0501, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and
imposes certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which
property is described as follows:
Lot 17 Blk 13, Naples Manor Addition, Plat Book 3, Pages 67-68
Cost: $245.00
Reference: 1674
Folio: 62102040003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
Thomas C. almer
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 29 of 43
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2000-325 against:
FELIX LERCH FAMILY TRUST
The lien was recorded on 10/17/2000, Official Record Book 2732 Page(s) 3348, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Three Hundred Forty Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Lot 17 Blk 13, Naples Manor Addition, Plat Book 3, Pages 67-68
Cost: $340.00
Reference: 1540
Folio: 62102040003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
..........
ktJ~
Thomas . Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
f~
t;:"':'F"'<'.'"
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 30 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2004-145 against:
JOHN D. ENDRES
The lien was recorded on 5/20/2004. Official Record Book 3568 Page(s) 3636, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred Fifty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Lot 28 Block 10, Naples Park Subdivision Unit 1, plat book 1 page 106
Cost: $255 Reference: 2453
Folio: 62418880009
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chainnan
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
~~
Thomas . Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
jc,,,,.-_""'"
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No, 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 31 of 43
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2005-14 against:
SALVATORE AND ANTIONETTE CAVATAIO
The lien was recorded on 2/4/2005, Official Record Book 3728 Page(s) 2430, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred and Fifty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and
imposes certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which
property is described as follows:
Lot 2 block 253 unit 7, Part Golden Gate, Plat Book 5 page 143
Cost: $255.00
Reference: 2590
Folio: 36448400003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of 1 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
17Y~ ~
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
~N1';,:A{'-""C
'"""""';$>"":;:';;0""""""'"
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 32 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2004-270 against:
SALVATORE AND ANTIONETTE CAVATAIO
The lien was recorded on 10/15/2004, Official Record Book 3661 Page(s) 1192, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred and Fifty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and
imposes certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which
property is described as follows:
Lot 2 block 253 unit 7, Part Golden Gate, Plat Book 5 page 143
Cost: $255.00
Reference: 2535
Folio: 36448400003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 33 of 43
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2001-289 against:
GARY ROOKSTOOL & ELEANOR PORRAS
The lien was recorded on 8/21/2001, Official Record Book 2879 Page(s) 0160, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
One Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any. and
imposes certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which
property is described as follows:
Lot 5 Block 16 Naples Manor Lakes, Plat Book 3, Pages 86 and 87
Cost: $1800.00
Reference: 1761
Folio: 62265480005
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment received from Alfonso Torres, the current
property owner. as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
Thom1kme~
Assistant County Attorney
~.~.i.o/"<o~~" ,.~~,. ;,t- ;,:, c, _;; ;'"
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 34 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 96-280 against:
GARY ROOKSTOOL & ELEANOR PORRAS
The lien was recorded on7/19/1996, Official Record Book 2208 Page(s) 0329, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Four Hundred Ninety Eight Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and
imposes certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which
property is described as follows:
Lot 5 Block 16 Naples Manor Lakes, Plat Book 3, Pages 86 and 87
Cost: $498.00
Reference: 51130-049
Folio: 62265480005
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment received from Alfonso Torres, the current
property owner, as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of ,2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
Thomas C. almer
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 35 of 43
SATISFACTION OF LIENS
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain liens by Resolutions No. 2003-100 and 2003-397 against:
CASPIAN BUILDERS, LLC
The liens were recorded on 4/03/2003 & 1211212003, Official Record Book 3256 Page(s)
1218 and Book 3462 Page(s) 1633, in the Official Records of Collier County, State of
Florida. The liens secure the principal sum of Six Hundred Seventy Five Dollars, plus
accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligation against real
property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property is described as follows:
Lots 35 and 36, Block 7, Unit of Naples Park, Plat Book 1 page 106
Cost: $675.00
Reference: 2231/2350
Folio: 62414480005
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the liens and hereby
cancels said liens.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the liens cease to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
(01+\ ~
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 36 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 90-641 against:
WILLIAM D. COLLINS, III, TRUSTEE, ITF FLORIDA SUN BEL T MORTGAGE CO.
The lien was recorded on 1/24/1991, Official Record Book 1587 Page(s) 2312, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred Forty Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
Lot 17 Block 13, Naple Manor Addition, Plat Book 3 pages 67-68
Cost: $240 Reference: 90-05-02297
Folio: 62102040003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of . 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
;iJ.V1^- ~~
Thomas. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
dt+L~'~k,;;,:i:,;,::",,">";
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 37 of 43
..I
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2003-441 against:
KELLY CONDON
The lien was recorded on 1/8/2004, Official Record Book 3480 Page(s) 1629, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred and Fifty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and
imposes certain obligation against resl property situated in Collier County, Florida, which
property is described as follows:
LOT 8 BLOCK E, MYRTLE COVE ACRES, ACCORDING TO PLAT
BOOK 3
Cost: $255.00
Reference: 2413
Folio: 60783600000
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
f~ ~1~
Thoma C. Palm r
Assistant County Attorney
""';;:C&'~_:"
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 38 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 2000-315 against:
WILLIAM MAE POSTELLE % G JEAN CANTY
The lien was recorded on 10/17/2000, Official Record Book 2732 Page(s) 3328, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
One Thousand Fifty Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property
is described as follows:
LOT 17 BLK 8 CARSON'S ADDITION PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 33
Cost: $1050 Reference: 1553
Folio: 25630920001
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of ,2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
IO",^ rJw..---
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 39 of 43
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by Resolution No. 98-410 against:
WILLIAM MAE POSTELLE % G JEAN CANTY
The lien was recorded on 11/09/1998, Official Record Book 2478 Page(s) 3094, in the
Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the principal sum of
Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and
imposes certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which
property is described as follows:
LOT 17 BLK 8 CARSON'S ADDITION PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 33
Cost: $245 Reference: 1828
Folio: 25630920001
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
(O~ U~~
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 40 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Secretary to the Special Master
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by an Order executed by the Special Master against:
RENE DAMPHIER
The lien was recorded on 12114/2004, Official Record Book 3695 Page
4153, in the Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien
secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Eighty Five Dollars and Thirty
One Cents, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida.
Cost: $285.31
Reference: SO 134810
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
~o ~ ~ - ~
Jenn' Belpedio \
Assistant County Arney
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Secretary to the Special Master
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A 12
May 10, 2005
Page 41 of 43
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by an Order executed by the Special Master against:
JOSEPH HARRINGTON
The lien was recorded on 12/14/2004, Official Record Book 3695 Page
4147, in the Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien
secures the principal sum of One Hundred Eighteen Dollars and Thirty
Cents, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain
obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which
property is described as follows:
Catalina Court
Cost: $118.30
Reference: CO 2004091215
Folio: 00431000006
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
rney
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10, 2005
Page 42 of 43
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Secretary to the Special Master
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by an Order executed by the Special Master against:
MICHAEL RYON
The lien was recorded on 12114/2004, Official Record Book 3695 Page
4150, in the Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien
secures the principal sum of One Hundred Sixty Nine Dollars and
Seventy Eight Cents, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and
imposes certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County,
Florida, which property is described as follows:
1005 Pine Isle Lane, Naples
Cost: $169.78
Reference: CO 2004081106
Folio: 24320200003
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of ,2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
~l ~ :l.
Jennifer elpedio ~
Assistant County Attorney
""<,.,~_',4,",,;:",~;.;;;.,;;~~ii<
This instrument prepared by:
Leonardo Bonanno, Operations Coordinator
Secretary to the Special Master
Code Enforcement Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 403-2440
Agenda Item No. 16A12
May 10,2005
Page 43 of 43
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF LIEN
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a
certain lien by an Order executed by the Special Master against:
AMBER-LOU INVESTMENT CO.
The lien was recorded on 3/7/2005, Official Record Book 3747 Page
0844, in the Official Records of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien
secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Thirty One Dollars and Thirty
Nine Cents, plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes
certain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida,
which property is described as follows:
1270 8th Street NE
Cost: $231.39
Reference: CO 2004100765
Folio: 37440400000
Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by execution of this
Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the lien and hereby
cancels said lien.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the
Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the lien ceases to exist.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction
of Lien, by action of the Board on this day of , 2005.
ATTEST
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
\"'\. r. I
......\ \ /"_.~-,f:':: \, >"'-;:':"$__." ,~
Jennm1r Belpedio '
Assistant County Attorney
., ""'~"';.""~''':iiV(i: "'~~:":')t;';~~"('~';i;';f;~'~~il't1-';~;;;;'
. "_~-; ",. ,..":c" v'i',,~}.. ""1.:'.'.'~-."-:" '-'" -,.',.:, .""_', ',:".<, ._...)~1j;'::~:_)l.:..'f',:"",:" ,.:.',.' '!.."'I"~'~' _".""_'. _,yyr
Agenda Item No. 1(" J4f'j
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners and the Collier County
Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) adopt an interlocal agreement between Collier
Count)r and the CRA establishing policies for the CRA pertaining to purchasing,
personnel, contracting authority, and budgeting.
OBJECTIVE: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners and the Collier
County Community Redevelopment Agen:-: {eRA) adopt an imerloca! agreemen: berweer
Collier Coumy - and the eRA establishing policies for the CRA pertaining to purchasing.
personnel, contracting authority, and budgeting.
CONSIDERATIONS: On March 12, 2004, the CRA entered into an agreement establishing an
Executive Director for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area. When the
Executive Director resigned before a replacement had been hired, the Redevelopment Area
found itself without any staff to operate its office. Recognizing the importance of continuity in
providing personnel services in the Redevelopment Area, at a December 29, 2004 emergency
meeting the Advisory Board decided to hire temporary help as a stopgap measure to staff the
redevelopment area until such time that a new Executive Director could be hired. Because of the
policy issues that arose as a result of hiring a temporary staff person, both the County and the
CRA agree that it would be mutually ,beneficial to establish clear guidelines for purchasing,
personnel, contracting authority and budgeting procedures. This action has been reviewed and
approved by the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA Advisory Board and the Bayshore/Gateway
Triangle Executive Director.
FISCAL IMPACT: The County will be reimbursed by the CRA for all direct and indirect costs
associated with services involving purchasing, personnel, contracting authority and budgeting;
and implementing the programs ot: or providing legal services to, the Bayshore/Gateway
Triangle Redevelopment Area. Funding will come from the trust account for the
Bayshore/Gateway CRA, Fund 187.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The recommended action is consistent with all applicable
constitutional and general law, and complies with adopted County and CRA regulations, and
thus, is legally sufficient for the Board's consideration and approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners and the
Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) adopt an interlocal agreement
between Collier County and the CRA establishing policies for the CRA pertaining to purchasing,
personnel, contracting authority, and budgeting.
Prepared By: John David Moss, AICP, Senior Planner, Comprehensive Planning
Item Number
Item Summary
16G3
Agenda Item No./~RI3
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 9
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Recommendation tnat the Board of County Commissioners and the Collier County
Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) adopt an interlocal agreement between Collier
COlll1ty ana the CRA establishing poliCies for the CRA pertaining to purchasing, personnel,
contracting authority and budgeting.
5/10/2005 90000 AM
Meeting Date
Prepared By
Dat('
'C: 1'l,!1a~;:"
'";mentc. :~c:
25'~ ..
Approved By
Stan Litsinger
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Comprehensive Planning Director
Date
Approved By
Comprehensive Planning
4/26/2005 9:08 AM
Sandra Lea
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Executive Secretary
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4/26/20059:12 AM
Approved By
Constance A. Johnson
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
Date
4/26/200510:24 AM
Approved By
Patrick G. White
County Attorney
Assistant County Attorney
Date
Approved By
County Attorney Office
4/28/20052:31 PM
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services Adminstrator
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4/28/2005 4:20 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
County Manager's Office
Administrative Assistant
Date
Office of Management & Budget
4128/2005 4:38 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
County Manager's Office
Budget Analyst
Date
Approved By
Office of Management & Budget
5/2/2005 12:36 PM
Michael Smykowski
County Manager's Office
Management & Budget Director
Date
Approved By
Office of Management & Budget
5/2/2005 5:36 PM
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Agenda Item No. 1~413
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of9
Board of County
Commissioners
Date
County Manager's Office
5/4/2005 9:55 AM
Agenda Item No./C,/t/3
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 9
mTERLOCALAGREEMENT
BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND
THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA)
ESTABLISHING POLICIES FOR THE CRA PERTAINING TO PURCHASING,
PERSONNEL CONTRACTING AUTHORITY, AND BUDGETING
'), .--- ~- .
~" , - ..
.~ :--. \.~ :~
. _ . _ . :']
. 2U05. b:. and betwc;:n Colii.': (ount). fL<laa. a poiillcai
subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter called the "COUNTY") and the Collier
County Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA), a separate legally distinct public
body (hereinafter called the "CRA"), collectively called the "Parties."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Section 125.01 (1) 0), Florida Statutes, empowers the legislative and
governing body of a county to establish and administer community redevelopment
programs; and
WHEREAS, Section 125.01(1) (p), Florida Statutes, enables the legislative and
governing body of a county to enter into agreements with other governmental agencies
within or outside the boundaries of the county for joint performance, or performance by
one unit in behalf of the other, or any of either agency's authorized functions; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.01(4), Florida Statutes, provides for public agencies
such as the County and CRA to exercise jointly any power, privilege, or authority which
such agencies share in common and which each might exercise separately; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.01 (5), Florida Statutes, provides for the joint exercise
of public agency powers in the form of an interIocal agreement; and
Page 1 of6
Agenda Item No.1 ~ Jf!3
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 9
WHEREAS, Section 163.AOO (I) (c), Florida Statutes, provides that any public
body may do any and all things necessary to aid or cooperate in the planning or carrying
out of a community redevelopment plan and related activities; and
WHEREAS. Section 163.400 (l ) (e), Florida Statutes. provides that any public
body (('~-\). for the nurn05;,' (If car~'ing out cOmmunjf~ r::.'Jeve!ooment and related
-"':i jiies. ;~lay el;, ," ,nl:) ",::::'~e:L?nb. Wi1i.::;-, p.1a:, eXlenc.\ er an: Dt';iOc1. not\\'ithsrandin;.
any provision or ruie of la\\ to the contrary, with another pubiic body (COUNTY)
respecting action to be taken and pursuant to any of the powers granted by this part,
including the furnishing of funds or other assistance in connection with community
redevelopment and related activities; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has adopted Resolution 2000-
82, finding the existence of blighted areas in the unincorporated area of the County and
further finding that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment or combination
thereof, in such areas is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or
welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has further
adopted Resolution 2000-83, declaring itself as the Collier County eRA to carry out and
implement the redevelopment powers and actions contemplated by Part III, Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes, within such areas; and authorizing the creation of advisory boards for
each component area of the community redevelopment area; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has adopted Ordinance 2000-
42, establishing redevelopment trust funds to provide for the funding of community
redevelopment within community redevelopment areas; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has adopted Resolution 2000-
181, adopting a Community Redevelopment Plan; and
Page 2 of6
Agenda Item No./~ AI3
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 9
WHEREAS, the Collier County CRA has adopted Resolution 2001-98, creating
the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board and the
lmmokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board, and providing for membership, terms,
purpose, duties, organization, and rules of procedure; and
\Vl_I!=:REAS. on \1arch 12. 2004. the CRA, '."~terec into ar. initi:; 32:reement
'li.iOllSnm"
:. :ysh .):::
Area: and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CRA are desirous of establishing a uniform
procedure for policies pertaining to purchasing, personnel, contracting authority, and
budgeting; and
WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge that establishing clear guidelines for their
interactions would be mutually beneficial.
WITNESSETH:
In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other valuable
consideration, the sufficiency of which is agreed to by the Parties, the COUNTY and the
CRA agree as follows:
Section I. A!!reement.
I. The above Whereas clauses, as Recitals, are incorporated herein by reference and
made part of this Agreement as if stated below.
2. The CRA hereby agrees to assist and cooperate with the COUNTY by timely
requesting any administrative support required for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle
Redevelopment Area when the Redevelopment Area is without the services and/or
employment of its Executive Director, or when requested by the CRA on an "as needed"
basis from the County through notice to the County's designated agent.
Page 3 of6
Agenda Item No./~ ftt3
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 9
3. The COUNTY and the eRA agree that the CRA will adhere to the COUNTY's
policies procedures pertaining to purchasing, personnel, contracting authority, and
bUdgeting.
4. The Parties agree that whenever necessary for the COUNTY to assume the
administrative responsibilities for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area
"her sai.:' Are.': i ~ witrou: th:- se;..,.icec: and/or er:1:)I(,~'01en: C~' .:::-. ~ ::uti,,:, ~:"ecto' :-ha:
:n;T~L... wi. '-ell~ :iU:' :.::: '~I!.'<~\ :'. c. ':::.i:=:: ::~:':: :'_...>...::
the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area during such times.
administering the functions. implememing the programs or: or providing legal sell Ices to
Section II. Amendments.
The CRA shall provide written notice to the COUNTY of amendments to any of the
aforementioned ordinances or resolutions and prior to the effective date of any such
amendment.
Section III. Notices.
All notices required under this agreement shall be directed to the following offices:
For the COUNTY: Office of the County Manager
330 I 1 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 341 12
For the CRA:
Donna Fiala, Chairman
Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency
33011 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Section IV. Hold Harmless-COUNTY.
The COUNTY agrees to hold the CRA harmless from all liability, which may result from
the negligent performance of the COUNTY's obligations as set forth herein, however this
paragraph shall not constitute a waiver of the County's sovereign immunity pursuant to
Florida Statutes, section 768.28.
Page 4 of6
Agenda Item No. 1(P1Jrt'3
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 9
Section V. Hold Harmless-eRA.
The CRA agrees to hold the COUNTY harmless from all liability, which may result from
the negligent performance of the CRA's obligations as set forth herein, done in
accordance with the terms of this agreement.
Section VI. This im~:"
:ig:. ;:;;i1e!1i. snal. D..: ;';::;':';droea in iii.
. 'Jb:
, ..... - -,,,-
_ ....; tIer
County.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and
year first above written.
DA TED:
A TrEST: Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF COLLIER COUNTY
BY:
Deputy Clerk
Donna Fiala, Chairman
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Patrick G. White, Assistant County Attorney
Page 5 of6
DA TED:
ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
._-~._----- _._----~-~-
Deput) Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
David C. Weigel, County Attorney
Page 6 of6
Agenda Item No. l(Pft/3
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 9
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
B'~
-----_.~-~-_._--- -------
Fred V' . CO)i...;. Chairmar.
Agenda Item No. 1681
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 11
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to award Bid No. 05-3803 to Haskins, Inc. for construction of phase two of
the Immokalee Fifth Street Drainage Improvement Project, Project Number 51725 in the
amount of $767,158.00 with a ten percent contingency of $76,715.80.
OBJECTIVE: To receive Board approval to award a contract to proceed with the drainage pipe
installation of the Immokalee Fifth Street, Phase II project for $767,158.00 as per plans and
specifications to the lowest bidder, Haskins, Inc.
CONSIDERATIONS: The bid was advertised on March 7, 2005. Notices were sent to one
hundred and seventy seven (177) firms with seven (7) firms requesting plans and specifications.
Three (3) responses were received and reviewed by Stormwater Management in conjunction with
the Purchasing Department, by the due date of April 13, 2005. Responses were received from the
following firms:
Douglas N. Higgins, Inc., Belair Builders, Inc., and Haskins, Inc.
The proposed work is located on the southwest quadrant of S.R. 29 and S.R. 846 along the north
side of Eustis A venue and the west side of Fifth Street South. The segment being proposed for
modification is approximately two thousand feet (2,000') in length along Fifth Street and
approximately one thousand-three hundred feet (1,300') in length along Eustis A venue.
This project is a continuation of drainage improvement efforts in Immokalee. The first phase, which
comprised drainage pipe installation of approximately three thousand-four hundred feet (3,400')
from Colorado A venue to Doak A venue, was completed in July 2004. The two additional segments
being proposed (along Eustis Avenue and Fifth Street) for ditch pipe installation are thus a
continuation of phase one.
Pitman-Hartenstein and Associates, Inc., a civil engineering design firm located in Fort Myers,
Florida, that completed the design and specifications for Phase I, were also approved on May 25,
2004 by the Board of County Commissioners to complete the design and specification for Phase II.
All necessary permits have been obtained and design for Phase II has been completed.
The Purchasing Department has reviewed the bids received and recommends awarding the
construction contract to Haskins, Inc. as the most qualified and responsive bidder.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $843,873.80 are available within the Stormwater
Management Capital Improvement Fund 301 under Project 51725. Bid Award of$767,158.00 with
a contingency of$76,715.80. Source of Funds are Ad Valorem Taxes.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The ditch enclosure project is in accordance with the
goals and objectives of the Drainage Sub-element of the Growth Management Plan for Collier
County Stormwater Management.
Agenda Item No. 1681
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 11
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners:
(1) Award contract 05-3803 to Haskins Inc., for phase II of the Immokalee and Fifth Street
Drainage Improvement Project.
(2) Direct the Board Chairman to execute a standard, County Attorney approved contract with
Haskins, Inc.
Prepared By: Dereck Moorley, Project Manager, Transportation Services Division, Stormwater
Management Department
Attachments: (1) Executive Summary; (2) Vicinity Map; (3) Project Location Map; (4) Bid Tab
.-
.-.-.
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Approved By
8r~nda Brilhart
Administralive Services
Agenda Item No 16B 1
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 11
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1681
RecomrYlenda1lon to award Bid No. 05-3803 to Haskins. Inc_ for cons1ruc1ion of phase two
of tile tmmokalee and Fifth Street Dra!nage Improvemenl Project, ProjeCl Number 51725 in
the amount 01 $767,158.00
5110/2005900,00 AM
Purchasing Agent
Date
Purchasing
4/251200511 :57 AM
Rieardu Vahml
Dirl!ct(ll
Dat.
Approved By
Transportiotl Services
StQrlnwater Management
"/25,'20051:11 PM
Mike Hauer
Acquisition Manager
Dal.
Approved By
Adminis.trutivt! SI~rvicl~S
PUlchasing
412:6120058:52 AM
Nonn E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Division Administrator
Oat.
Approved By
Trans;partion Services;
TransoportatiOfl Serlices; Admin.
4.'2612005 2:38 PM
Sharon Newman
Accounting Supervisor
Date
Approved By
Transportlon SUNic(I'S
Transportation Adlninislrution
4i2612005 4:4" PM
Gerald Kurtz
Senior Engineer
Date
Approved By
Transportiol1 Service.s
Stormwiliter Management
4/26/20055:41 PM
Pat lehnl'1ard
E)(eC\ltivl~ S(tcretary
Date!
Appro...ed By
Transportation Services;
Tran.s-portation Servkl!!s Admin
4/27120059:07 AM
Steve C.am~1I
Purcha$lng/Gen~ral SVCIi Direetor
Dat.
Approved By
AdministrntiviP. SIHVi(:I~~;
Purchasing
4'27/200511 :16 AM
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Alo11istant
Oat.
Approved By
County Manager'. Office
ONi&e of Management & Budget
4/2812oo5 4:36 PM
Sll~UIR UHllnf
Senior M4UlagementiBudg(!t Analys;t
D~ro
Approved By
County Manag~r's. Offic~
Oftice of Manogl!-m~nt & Budget
4i29/2005 11 :04 AM
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
Approved By
county Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/200512:29 PM
County Manager
DOlte!
Approved By
Jam!!$> V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Officl!l
4(30j2005 1 :24 PM
PROPOSED BY: COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVICES
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
2885 SOUTH HORSESHOE DRIVL NAPLES. FLORIDA
PHONE(239)-774-8192, FAX (239)-659-5700
Agenda Item No. 16B 1
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 11
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PROJECT No. 517252
IMMOKALEE 5TH STREET DITCH
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
I--
0>
<:
<:
lJ.J
::E
o
0::
~
CI)
a
0::
'"
<:
2ND A VE~
~
<:
CI)
a
<:
'""
<:
CI)
;::
"-
<:
CI)
~
'"
<:
::l
: 'PINE ST~
I a
I <:
I '""
I
f..l
MAIN ST E
I--
CI)
~
LO
<:
MAIN ST W
I--
CI)
Cl
::E
::J
I--
CI)
~
u
o
u
<:
:f
CI)
I--
CI)
i!:
"-
CI)
I--
CI)
i!:
'"
CI)
I--
CI)
a
0::
'"
CI)
I--
CI)
a
<:"
'""
BOSTON AVE
ANDRES LN
CI)
I--
CI)
i!:
0>
COLORADO AVE
CI) CI) CI) CI)
I-- I-- I-- I--
CI) CI) U CI)
i!: i!: i!: i!:
co r-... co <0
EUSTIS AVE
PALMETTO AVE
PROJECT LOCATION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
1--/
CI)
1--/
CI)
,..,
CI)
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
DATE: MARCH,2005
o
I
1.000
I
500
PROJECT MANAGER: DERECK MOORLEY
Feet
-~:
~o
.,i..;-L!)
~gs,
~&:
~
c
Q)
OJ
<(
>-
Q) Cii
-g 1U
0
:2: ~
- ,-,", E
'Q) 0
.Cii en
'0 E
(5, Q)
:2: E
t::
1) Cll
a.
Q) Q)
'6' 0
a:
Qi
~
Ui
.c
jj) c
'0 0
(U+:i
o U
(")a::2ll'l
~Q.l1i)e
\ (") ~ g ~
. ,;, ]! (,) ~
JOO..c..
-t:jEEQ)
ii'iEiSB
(,) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 0 c:i 0 c:i LO c:i N 0 0 0
II) 0 0 .-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0
C LO LO 0 LO LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:i2 ..- f'- N LO LO LO 0 0 cr) LO LO LO
II) f'- f'- .-- .-- ..- ..-
lIS fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7
:I:
c..i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <q 0 0 0 0 0
C 0 0 '<t 0 C"'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 c:i C") 0 N 0 0 0
II) rh 0 0 .-- 0 N 0 C") 0 0 0 0 0 (0 0 0 0
lIS <Xl 0 <Xl C") ..- C") 0 0 0 0 C") 0 0 0
- C '<t N N ....- 0 0 0 0 '<t- en en
en ._
::s C) en en C") C"'l
0 .~
C :I:
fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7
c..i N 0 ~ 0 co 0 f'- 0 f'- f'- co co LO 0 f'- 0
C f'- <q 0 .-- 0 0 f'- ~ ~ LO LO <Xl 0 0 0 f'- f'-
~ f'- <Xl N <Xl cv> (0 -=i 0 ..- ..- N N oq- N C"'l 0 (0 <q
'a; ~ en <Xl .-- <Xl .-- ....- ....- '<t '<t '<t N N N <Xl '<t -=i '<t
G) en en '<t C") LO ....- N N '<t '<t en .-- <Xl <Xl
Q) -=i" N - LO 0> en <Xl cO N cD f'- f'-
m ;g ..-
LO LO ..- .-- N N
::s '<t '<t
m fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7 fI7
<' i:O u::- 5 - - ~ 8 - - en - - u::- 5 ~ ;;;.;..
u. 0 Cf) ~ ....- u. 0 ~
~ ....;.. 2 0 ...J 0 ~ ~ 2- 2- --- 2 N ...J 0 2-
- ~ --- ....- - iii S --- 0 iii
- (/) m - - --- - - - (/) - - (jj ~ (jj
(/) 0 (/) - (/) - (/) (/) (/) 0 (/) 0 (/) iii 0
0 () 0:: 0 (/) 0 (/) 0 0 0 () 0 () 0 0 (jj 0 ()
() () 0 () 0 () () () () () 0 () ()
ro 0 () ~ () ro ro () 0 ro
~ - Cf) - - ~ ro - 0 - 0 ~ ~ () - -
c 0 c ro c ro c 0 c 'E c ro c 'E 0
I- ::> c ::> l- I- ::> ::> ro I-
::> '~ - E - ::> ::> ::> - ::>
0 0 I- 0 -
I- ~ l- I- 0
0 ~ I-
0
C N ()
0 ai >
;i c e..
CL Q) 0 Ii)
';:: ~ '<t Q)
(,) .s:: L-
II) ~ .s:: u
Q) u rn
Cf) L-
a Q) ..-
0 - ~
E e.. ~ Q) "C
Q) ~ ~ ~ u (J) g
::: L- iE .lI:::
Q) et! :0
a. ,~ 'w - rn en
rn L- .0
rn rn ~ I- Q) :::l
l- e.. () - .: u L-
g- o (J) c (9
Q) Q) Q) .;:: Q)
u u u (J) L- U. "C
.~ '~ '~ +:; c U et! c
(/) 0 c CD :!: et!
Q) Q) Q) 'x +:; rn ~ Cf) ~
Cf) Cf) Cf) I.U rn c
L- L- eu - ~ Q) "0 "C
(J) Q) Q) C :0 Q) 'C
- ro - (/) :0 .lI::: rn
et! rn 0 'ffi L- et! Q)
~ ~ ~ (J) :::l en (3
0:: ~ ~ I-
W
C)
ci c( ..-
, .--
z z C :;- C r N C") ,
~ ..- ....- ....- .-- ..-
E '-- ~ , , , , ,
~ CD () 0 .-- N oq- '<t 0
Q) , , , 0 0 0 0 .--
- a N N N N .-- ....- ....- .-- .--
....-
..- I{) ..-
~~
+';-c.o
~~
~&
~
c
Q)
OJ
<(
>-
Gl CD
15
0 1;;
~ ~
~ E
Gl 0
CD <i5
0 E
i5, Gl
~ E
t
i3 CO
a.
Gl Ql
'Q 0
a:
a;
~
<i5
L:
iD c
-c 0
co~
o u
(<)0::211)
oQ.)Uie
COGlC<,">
,?(ijo~
L!)~u..r
C)~-5Qj
:2E='=:::l
00_00
u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r:::: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ui ci 0 I{) I{) ci ci 0 0 ci 0 ex> ci N 0 l"- I{) 00 0
..- 0 N I"- 0 0 C') 0 0 0 0 ..- N I{) ..- CD
r:::: 0 0 0 I{) 0 0 ex> I{) CD N
:i2 ..- L!) L!) r--"" N N '<t 0 ..- .--
Ul '<t '<t '<t '<t ..- N ..-
ca Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell
:I:
U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C>
r:::: 0 0 0 0 0 0 L!) 0 0 0 L!) 0 00 0 '<t 0 0 0
Ul C') 0 0 0 0 0 ..- L!) 0 0 L!) ..- 00 ..- ..- 0 0
ca Ul 0 C') (J) 0 0 I"- 0 0 N I"- C') ..- 0
- r:::: C') 0 0 C') 0 0 (J) 0 C') I"-
Cl._
~ Cl ..- ..- (J) (J) C') N
o Cl
C .-
:I: Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell
U 0 0 I"- ..- L!) L!) ex> 0 0 0 L!) 0 L!) 0 N 0 CD 0
.E I{) 0 0 N ""': ""': ..- 0 00 ex> 0 L!) ~ L!) ..- ex> ~ N
.: ~ N 0 '<t N ..- ..- r-..: L!) ..t '<t L!) N ..- L!) o:i '<t ..- C>
ca C') LO ..- '<t ex> ex> C') (J) ..- ..- '<t ..- (J) ..- C') '<t C')
Gi N LO LO N N N CD CD C') ex> ex> 0
CI) - 0 ci (J) 0 0 (J) 00 - N
m :!2 C') ..- ..-
..- ..- LO LO ..- C')
~ Ell ffi, Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell ffi, Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell Ell
m
>=' - ~ - Cii - s:- o en - >=' 0 >=' 0 s:- Iii ~ 0
0 ~ :: ..-
~ 0 w 2 S? LO 2 - ~ LO ~ ..- ~ CD ~ t::
~ - Iii Iii ~ Iii 00 I"- CD
.... Iii 0 Iii 0 .... Iii 0 C;; ~ Iii :: Iii :: Iii C;;
Ul Iii u u Ul C;; U 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 Iii 0 C;; 0 C;; 0
u 0 u u - u 0 u u u u u u
u Cii ro U Cii 0 ~ 0 0
.... .... a .... 0 .... .... a .... u .... u .... u .... co
c ro c 'c c ro c c ~ c c c 0
::J a ::J I- ::J I- ::J 0 ::J I- ::J Cii ::J Cii ::J ro ::J l-
I- I- a "C 0 0
Q) I- ro l- I-
0
W ~
r:::: .....
0 :Q"
0 c
.. 0 0
Co S? ro 0 "E
.;: ..... -
'C Q) Q)
(,) "E Q) E N E
Ul ro --
CI) Q) :.::i ..- Q)
E ~ ,
c ..- >
Q) x ~ ~ - ro
E > 0 Q) N Q) a..
CI) , ro .0 ::c CD Ul ....
a.. :~ ..- ...
~ '(ij ~ g ::J ro
g ~ C ::J C 0 Q
g- o Ul 0 0 u
~ ~ ..... Ul
~ C C) Q) <(
'x ti > ::J ,~ 0
.... Q) ro Ul
W 'x ro 0 "E Li Ul 't: ::J
0 ro 0
"- x Q) ro :J
0 W c CD Q)
W 0 E U5 CJ) c
Cii Q) ..... ~ ~ ro
ro ro
> ro c CD c CJ) Q)
0 0 ~ > ro 0 Q)
E .Q ro .0 ~ ~ 0
0 E .g- ,!!?
Q) Q) Q) x ~ ~
r:r. a::: 0:: w UJ 0 l-
e) r CD
z ~ 0
"l I"- ..- '<t CD "l l"- N ..-
E , , , , , , ,
0 0 C> 0 0 0 LO ..- (J)
Q)!~ ..- N N N CD ex> C') ('t)
-1"- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- N C') ('t)
N
-.- 1O ~
~~
.........1'-
~~
m~
i
c
Q)
OJ
~
>-
~ Iii
0 iii
0
::iE ~
~ E
1Il 0
Iii Ci:i
0 "E
~ 1Il
::iE E
1::
"0 III
C.
1Il 1Il
'0' 0
a:
Qj
!!!
Ci5
.r::.
iO C
'C 0
cv+=
o 0
C'lc:::2lCl
oQ)t;e
<XlQ)CC'l
C( 10 ,Q. ~
lCl~'-'''<t
C)~i3Qj
~EB5
I
U a a 0 0 a 0 a a a 0 a a a a 0 a 0 0
c a a 0 0 a 0 a a a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0
a 0 0 0 0 N a a a 0 0 a 0 a co a lri 1.0
III 0 a 1.0 1.0 1.0 V a a 0 0 1.0 1.0 a 0 ..- co N N
C a a ...... I"- (0 a ..... co 1.0 1.0 l"- N a 0 co (0
:;: IJ') LO ("f) N cD N I"- ("f) ..- (0 <D N ......
fI) M ("f) ..- V
llS tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7
:I:
U 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0
Z 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 a 0 0 0 a a a 0 a 0
.5 0 a 0 0 0 N a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 1.0 1.0
III rn a 0 0 0 0 1.0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a <D 0 l"- I"-
llS 0 0 I"- 1.0 V 1.0 a 0 co v 1.0 IJ') 0 0 co co
- C 1.0 1.0 M ..- (0 ("f) V M ..- 1.0 0 l"- I"- en v
en ._
::s en M ("f) N ...... (0
0 en
e ,-
:I: tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7
U V V 1.0 1.0 V ~ en N 0 v 0 0 l"- I"- co 0 I"- 1.0
C 0 0 l"- I"- (0 I"- ("f) en en ...... """: "": "": I"- co 0 1.0
... lri lri to ("f) ('t) ..- ("f) 0 <D 0 N ..- ..... ..... (0 -:i 0 v
'C;; f v v N ("f) ("f) 0 ("f) ?"- M ...... co 0 ..... ..... N co M 1.0
Q; 0 0, 1.0 (0 co en v v_ a ...... (0 1.0 v_ V N 0>
Q) - N LO N r--: ..f -
a:I ::5! ..- ..... N ("f) en v N I"- ......
1.0 1.0 ..- ...... (0
::s tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7 tI7
a:I
~ - >=' ~ >=' 00- ~ 00- ~ ("f) Ci: ;;;( :;::: ~ ~ ~ G:' 8 G:' LO
Cf) ~ +-' S
2 ~ ~ (0 W = ~ 1Il E ~ :s ~ 2 (0 2 ~
+-' +-' ~ - +-' 0 iii :s
+-' 1Il 1Il +-' 1Il +-' () ::I iii ::I +-' +-' fjj
2' 0 +-' 0 +-' 0 fjj fjj 0
1Il 1Il 1Il 1Il 00 1Il 00 00 +-' 00
0 () 0 U 0 iii 0 () 0 ro - 0 0 0 () 0 00 0 0
Q) () () () 0 () () ~ () () :s () () 0 () ()
ro ro ro +-' ro ()
Q +-' +-' +-' +-' +-' () +-' +-' ;!::: 0 ;!::: ~ ;!::: +-' ;!::: +-' m
E 'E 0 'E 0 'E ro 'E 0 c I- ~ c ~ c 0 c: ro c +-'
0 :::l I- :::l I- :::l :::l I- :::l 0 :::l 0 0 :::l I-- :::l +-' :::l 0
+-' ...... I-- ...... 0 I-
~ 0
I-- Y- Y- I--
Q)
.... Q) 2
::I +-'
C +-' m m
u .... ....
0 ::I C> C>
;; ....
+-' W W
Q. Cf) Q) .~
'i: 1Il ,~ ,~ .9-
::I
(,) ;<g 0 ~ ~ a.. a..
III (J) (J) Q)
Q) ::I C E l- I--
e c c:
0 J!! +-' ::I ::I (J) Q)
E Q) .s::::. 00 1Il E E ~ ~
ro :Q1 - 0 0
Q) u S ..- := := .s::::. .s::::.
s: .~ m - +-' ~
:: .... 0 0 ~
g :2 +-' ~ ~ .0 .0
Cf) a 0 ~ Co 0 0
- - ..... ..- a.. a..
'E 1Il - :!.- x
'iij 1Il 1Il :!.- "" (0 "C "C
Q) m 00 (J) Q)
<3 J!! () ro ro +-' ~
W ~
0::: () .~ 2i '(3 '(3
Q) a.i 2i ~ ::I ::I
.... ....
+-' Q) ro ~ .... ....
Q) 0 0
I.- .... I-- en en
u u ~ () ()
c: C "C -
0 0 c CD CD CD CD ro Co
() U w Q Q Q Q ..- .....
1= CD ("f) 1.0
, N N
..... ..- ..- ..- ...... .....
01 1.0 N 1.0 0 0 , I
...... N 1.0 1.0 0> en ...... .....
Z , , , , , I l"- I"-
...... ..- ..... ...... ..- ..- ..- .....
E I I , I , I , ,
0 0 0 1.0 IJ') 1.0 1.0 0 0
Q) 0 0 0 N N N N ("f) M
:: v v v v v v v v v
("f)
..- L!"J .,-
~~
'+-;"00
~~
~&:
i
c
aJ
0)
<(
>-
Q)
~
o
:2
-""
Q)
Q;
Cl
Q;
iii
~
E
o
ii3
"E
Q)
E
t:
m
c.
Q)
Cl
i5,
:2
u
Q)
.0'
a:
a;
~
ii3
..c
ii'5 c
'0 0
m+::
o 0
C')o::2Ll)
g~~~
<(rno~
Ll)-""U~
OO..c,.
.. E 0 Q)
:2E"":J
aJ_ClO
CJ
c:
-,
-I
1/)1
c:
~
I/)
III
:I:
z g
I/) _
..!!! I/) 1
C) .:
~ C)
o C)
Ox
u
c:
~
~ ~
CIl CIl
mJ:!
~
m
c:1
o
..
c. Ql
'i: ,Q.
CJ a..
I/) Ql
CIl c
o Ql
E ?:
CIl .r::
:: ~
a
a..
''0
Ql
~
:J
L-
L-
a
U
"r
N
0>
, N
.! ~
o .,-
ZII'-
EI~
CIl ('f)
- "<:t
o 0
o 0
LO 0
C") LO
"<:t
C")
N
~ ~
o 0
o 0
o 0
CD 0
N
o
"<:t
~ ~
N 0
I'- "<:t
..- N
LO L!"J
CD
"<:t
('f)
~ €A-
LLO
,.....J I'-
-~
00
o 00
t) 0
- ()
c co
::J (5
I-
Ql
a.
a..
Ql
c
Ql
~
.r::
~
a
a..
'0
Ql
~
:J
L-
a
()
(0
C")
co
C")
..-
,
..-
I'-
..-
,
o
C")
"<:t
o
o 0
CD ~
ill CD
ill 0>
C/) N
€A-
o 0
o 0
o 0
I'- 0>
~ €A-
I'- 0>
o ..-
LO co
CD "<:t
..-
o
"<:t
€A- €A-
LL~
....J ..-
:::~
(fl _
a (fl
~ 8
c co
:::J (5
I-
('f)
"<:t
o 0
o 0
L{) L{)
CD 0>
I'-
0>
"<:t
N
€A-€A-
o 0
o 0
L{) L{)
0> co
o
L{)
CD
('f)
€A- €A-
0> I'-
0> L{)
('f) ('f)
co I'-
I'-
N
N
C")
€A- €A-
(LC;;
:::: ~
~ ~
U 00
.... a
c U
:::J co
(5
I-
.~
a..
Ql
c
Ql
~
.r::
~
a
a..
'0
Ql
~
:J
L-
L-
a
U
00
"<:t
..-
"<:t
..-
,
..-
I'-
..-
,
o
C")
"<:t
o 0
o 0
o 0
('f) 0
N
€A- €A-
o 0
o 0
LO 0
..... 0
CD
€A- €A-
"<:t 0
0> CD
I'- I'-
CD ..-
I'-
N
€A- ~
LLO
~~
Ui 1i)
a 0
U ()
.... l'tl
C (5
:::J I-
Ql
,9
a..
"r
N
g.
:E
(f)
Ql
o
0>
N
,
..-
"<:t
0>
,
o
C")
"<:t
..-
00
..-
C
o
U
Ql
C/)
'0
C
W
'0
Ql
L-
~
~
LO
N
..-
,
N
co
0>
,
o
C")
"<:t
o 0
o 0
o 0
LO L{)
co L{)
N
€A- ~
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
N CD
~ ~
N CD
C") 0>
C") 0>
co "<:t
0> 0>
N
€A- €A-
~~
~oo
00 a
o U
() co
- (5
:S I-
"r
N
C
a
U
Ql
C/)
'0
C
ill
'0
Ql
L-
~
~
0>
N
..-
,
N
co
0>
,
o
('f)
"<:t
€A- €A-
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
L{) L{)
N I'-
€A- €A-
N CD
C") 0>
C") 0>
co "<:t
0> 0>
N
€A- €A-
~C;;
~~
.... a
~ U
U co
~ ....
C a
:::J I-
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
N CD
..- ('f)
o 0
o 0
L{) 0
I'- L{)
N
N
€A- €A-
o 0
o 0
o 0
C") 0
0>
~ €A-
"<:t 0
I'- N
co N
C") CD
€A- €A-
LLO
:::!~
en en
a a
U U
- ctl
C (5
:::J I-
o
"<:t
.r::
t)
~
9
C
E
l;:::
~
Ql
,Q.
a..
()
>
a..
(0
CD
..-
N
,
..-
CD
0>
,
o
('f)
"<:t
.....
C
a
~
L-
a
00
Ql
0:::
(f)
:J
o
Ql
C
..!!!
(jj
t)
,!Q
~
;;
o
o
L{)
- ~
~ ~
-00
00 a
o ()
~ co
'c (5
::J I-
o
o
o
o
o
o
..-
~
o
o
o
o
o
o
..-
€A-
o
o
o
o
o
o
..-
~
o
o
o
o
o
o
..-
€A-
o
o
o
o
o
o
..-
~
~
,~
.r::
I-
(0
?i:
ctl
~
Ql
>
.;;:
o
Ql
(j)
L-
t)
C
a
U
N
I
N
N
L{)
o 0
~ 0
co 0
..- LO
o
"<:t
€A- €A-
o 0
o 0
o 0
CD 0
LO
C")
..-
€A- ~
CD 0
L{) 0
I'- ..-
"<:t 0
I'-
o
..-
€A- ~
v
S:-LO
~gj
- '-"
~ Ci5
~ 8
C co
:::J (5
I-
'--. ..- 1.D ~
~~
.........0)
~~
~&:
i
c
Q)
01
<C
>-
Q) CD
-g
0 i;j
:2 ~
-'" E
Q) 0
CD U5
0 -E
...: Q)
OJ E
:2 t:
U ClI
a.
Q) Q)
0' 0
a:
Q)
~
U5
..c:
LO c
"0 0
10:+=
o 0
(")0::21.0
~~~~
("")-O-r-
J,~t)~
C)~f3Qi
~E156
,
cj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LO LO 0 0 Lri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0
III C'f) N co N CO t- o 0 0 0 0 ..- LO LO 0 0 0
C LO ..- LO LO LO ('I) C'f) LO LO -.:t_ ('I) LO LO
:iii: ..- ..- N N ('I) ('I) ..- CO ('I) C'f)
III ..- ..-
ftI EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA-
:I:
cj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO LO 0 0 0 0
c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0
rn rh t- LO 0 0 CO co 0 0 0 0 0 -.:t CO LO 0 0 0
nI 0 ..- -.:t_ co_ o 0 LO LO 0 C'f) LO ..- 0> 0 0
- c ..- ..- 0 -:f -:f N N ..- 0 -.:t -:f
C1._
~ CI ..- N
0 m
C "-
:I: EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA-
U ..- LO co N N CO N N -.:t -.:t co CO LO LO t- t- t- t-
.E ..- CO co C'f) 0> I"': t- t- LO LO LO LO ..- t- ~ ~ 0> 0>
... ('I) CO cD CO cD ..- LO LO r--.: t- ..t t- N C'f) ..- ..- t- t-
"e; f -.:t -.:t 0> LO CO ..- -.:t -.:t 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0> en
G) -.:t co_ ..- t- O> t- t- t- t- O> 0 co_ -.:t -.:t N N
II) - ('I) -
CD ;g CO N ..- ('I) ..- ..- LO N t- CO CO
..- ..-
::l EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- EA-
m
s: LO - ~ LL <0 ~ - ~ ~ Z ~ s:- LO ~ <0 - ~
Z s :: en ::
~ ..- C ..- 2- t- ~ ~ C C'f) ~ N W '=- 2-
--- --- s iil .- .....:.. N --- .- .-
.- .- .- Ul Ul Ul
.- .- .- 0 .- 0 .- .- - ~ .- 0 iii 0
Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul - Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul
0 0 0 0 0 Ul 0 U 0 U 0 0 0 0 U 0 U
U U 0 -
..x:: U U U u ro U ro U U U Ul U ro U
t) U 0 ro
, i: .- ro .- ro ;t:: ~ 0 .- 0 ;t:: ro ;t:: - .- .- 0
.- c: 0 c: 0 c: ro c: 'e c: c U c 0 c
::> :::::- l- I- .- l- I-
::> ::> - ::> - ::> ::> 0 ::> ro ::> :::>
'-t l- I- a ~ l-
I- ro ~ 0
't:l .... I-
Q) ro ~
t) e:.
c ....
0 .E ~ :?:
:;:: c
Co '(j) .0 .0
'': .... E E
,
c.)' c: Q) Q)
III 0 Ul Ul C
II) c: Ul Ul .~
0 c- <( <( en
E ~ ~ -
Q) Q)
II) E ro ro
:: E .... .... Q)
Q) 0 0 ....
ro .-
> Q) .s:::: .s:::: U) g
ro ID co t) (.) g
a.. c c
, <( <( :e.
.s:::: ::c Q) ro +:;
(.) .0 'i:: 't:l 't:l E Ul ....
;t:: :::l .s:::: c: c ro 'x en
0 0::: I- W W CD W
-
Q) --- .... Q) c
.- c.. 'm 'm ro Q) Qi ro Q)
Q) ro .... .... .... 1;1 c: E
.... 0::: 't:l 't:l "E i5 (.)
t) .... .... 0 Q)
c ro ro ro :e -0 >
0 c.. :::l :::l :::l <1l a Q) ro
IU 0:: <.9 <.9 <.9 u.. (J') 0::: Cl.
-.:t LO
0 N N N
N ,. LO , , ..- ,
Z I , LO LO I co
..- ('I) ..- co co LO ..- ,. I
E1-:t , , I , , I
0 CO co CO 0 LO 0 0
II) N ('I) ('I) C'f) C'f) t- t- o ..-
- LO LO LO LO LO LO LO t- t-
LO
..- L() ..-
~~
~-o
~';
~fu ~
~o...
~
c
Il)
OJ
<C
>-
Ql
15
o
:2
.>c:
Ql
Iii
o
Qi
iii
:;:
E
(5
U5
-E
Ql
E
1::
ctI
a.
Ql
o
5,
:2
u
Q)
'0
a:
Q;
!!:!
U5
~
iil C
"C 0
CO-..:=;
o u
C')a::2Ll'l
oQ.)c;;e
OOQ)CC')
('l")-o~
u1~O:;.r
Cl~-5Qj
1;1 E :!:O ::l
CO_DO
z g
I/) _I
C'lI I/)
- c: i
Cl,_
~ Cl
o Cl
Ci:
...
C'lI l!!
a; Q)
m:s;!
~
m
ci
z
E
Q)
-
u
c:
I/)
c:
:i:
I/)
C'lI
J:
Q
Q
ex)
it)
.... >- >- >- >- >- >-
,.:
CD
,...
~
Q
it)
..;
CO
~ >- >- >- >- >- >-
CD
....
C!.
....
~
c.i
c:
'''It
N
..;
S >- >- >- >- >- >-
o
M
en
~
...J~~tciu'O~
~ ~ O'O~ C:o
r- ~ U :'!2 .2:; 0 ro
00 ~CO(j)CO u
~ '+- ~ -a'-
~ c '0 ro CO'~
C~OQ)(j) ro
~ffi,gu..c
0::: ~ ~ C U
C) (j),~ a3
,~ '0 ~ ~
Q) in x
co :.::i L.U
~ '0
c:
,2 ,
-
C-
'':;
U
I/)
Q)
C
E
Q)
::
c
Q)
E
Q)
co
U5
~
'0
~
'0
Q)
~
o
c
~
u
~
E
~
'0
C
Q)
'0
'0
~
(0
t '-
ro Q)
..c 13
'i:: Q)
co I
ro ro
'0 '-
C ro
Q) .0
"- "-
CO ~
"E (/l
~ ~
~ E
g ~
c
Q)
a.
o
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PROJECT No. 517252
IMMOKALEE 5TH STREET DITCH
VICINITY MAP
3t('
B4
6
A.....'.
IPROJECTLOCATIONr .!
q
\()
Agenda Item No. 1681
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 11
. )
L'
PROPOSED BY: COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVICES
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
2885 SOUTH HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA
PHONE (239)-774-8192, FAX (239)-659-5700
PROJECT MANAGER: DERECK MOORLEY
DATE: MARCH,2005
.
o
I
2,450
4,900
I
Feet
Agenda Item No. 1682
May 10,2005
Page 1 of 10
~,-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve a Work Order in the amount of $556,825.00 to Quality
Enterprises USA, Inc. for construction of the Westlake Outfall Improvements Project
(Project No. 510056), in accordance with the General Underground Utility Contract No.
04-3535 and to approve a budget amendment in the amount of $239,832.50.
OBJECTIVE: To receive Board of County Commissioners' approval of a Work Order for the
Westlake Outfall Improvements Project (Project No. 510056) to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc. in
accordance with the General Underground Utility Contract No. 04-3535.
CONSIDERATIONS: For several years the Stormwater Management Department of the
Transportation Services Division has received drainage complaints in the Westlake Subdivision.
The original drainage system consists of a corrugated metal pipe currently undersized and with
an outdated lifespan. The purpose of the Westlake Outfall Improvement Project is to mitigate
flooding by providing enhanced conveyance capabilities to the Goodlette-Frank Road Canal
while improving water quality through the addition of a water control structure. Several homes
within the approximate 50-acre watershed are on septic, which worsens water quality conditions
by adding bacteria and nutrients to the stormwater during the rainy season.
~
Please note that the amount of the Budget Amendment reflects a 10% contingency of $55,682.50
over the lowest quote of $556,825 .00 for a total value of $612,507.50.
Five (5) quotes were received including three (3) No Quotes from firms under the "04-3535
Underground Utility Contracting Services" contract.
SUMMARY OF QUOTES
Name of Company Amount of Quote
Quality Enterprises USA, Inc. $556,825.00
D.N. Higgins, Inc. $613,440.00
Mitchell & Stark Const. Co., Inc. No Quote
Haskins, Inc No Quote
Kyle Construction, Inc. No Quote
FISCAL IMPACT: The total funding needed for this project is $612,507.50. Funding in the
amount of $172,675.00 is available in Fund 301 Westlake Outfall Improvements Project (Project
No. 510056). An approved grant from the SFWMD in the amount of $200,000.00 will partially
fund the construction cost. Additional funding needed for this project in the amount of
$239,832.50 will come entirely from funds allocated for the Avalon School Ditch Improvement
Project (Project No. 511072). Construction of the Avalon School Ditch Improvement Project is
rescheduled for FY 06.
The source of funding is ad valorem taxes.
,-..
Agenda Item No, 1682
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 10
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: The Culvert Replacement and Drainage Improvement
project is in accordance with the goals and objectives of the Drainage Sub-element of the Growth
Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners:
(1) Award a Work Order under Contract No. 04-3535 to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., in the
amount of$556,825.00.
(2) Direct the Board Chairman to execute a Work Order under Contract No. 04-3535 with
Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.
(3) Approve the necessary budget amendment.
Prepared By: Gianfranco Nicolaci, Project Manager, Transportation Services Division,
Stormwater Management Department.
Attachments: (1) Executive Summary; (2) Work Order; (3) Location Map; (4) Quality
Enterprises USA, Inc. Quote
~
""..-'
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenc.la Item No, 1682
May 10, 2005
Page:3 of 10
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16B2
Recommendation to approve a Work Order in the amount of $556,825,00 to Quality
Enterprises USk Inc. for construction ofthe Westlake Outfall Impro\lements Project
(Project No 510056), in accordance with the General Underground Utility Contract No. 04~
3535 and a budget amendment In the amount of S23~L832 50
511 0/200590000 AM
Gi.mtmn(:o Nicl}laci
PrOlltC:1 MilnaHI~f
4!2G!2D05 8:20:57 AM
Prepared By
Transporta1ioll Services
Dale
Stormwater Management
Sharon Newman
AccoLln1ing Supervisor
Dale
Approved By
Tnlluportion Services
Transportatiol1 Administration
4126/2005 11 :03 AM
Ricardo Valera
Director
Date
Approved By
TrallSpOJtioll Snfvic(!$;
Stormw..h~r M.mayelnf!nt
4/26/2005 1 :35 PM
Margaret A. Bishop
Project Manager
Date
Approved By
Trillnsportion Services
Slormwllter MOiInagement
4/26/2005 3:36 PM
Gerald KurU
Senior Engineer
Date
Approved By
Transportiol1 Services
Stormwater Management
-I12S/20DS 5:12 PM
Rh(lndOl Rl~lnb",rt
Contnu:t Sp(~di)li"t
DatI!!:
Approved By
Administrative SelVices
Purchasing
4/27 i2005 9:03 AM
Steve Carnell
Pu~hasing/General Svcs Director
Date
Approved By
Adminish.11ive SI~fVjl::es
Purchas.ing
"'27/20Q5 12:56 PM
Nonn E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
Approved By
TranspoJtioll S(!fVil;(!S
Tr.lns,mrtati()fl Sr.rVI<:es Admin.
4/28'20051:33 AM
Pat L(!hnh.urd
Executive Secn~ary
OatH
Approved By
Transportalion Service!>
Trnn'Spor1ntion Ser..-iccs Admin
4128/20058:02 AM
OMB Com'dinatQr
Administrative A'tisistan1
D;)le
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/28/2005 ":17 PM
$US,1h Ushf!r
Sf!nior ManagemenllBudgd Anal}'!>1
Da1e
Approved By
Coullty Mana1Jnr'5 Offi[:l~
Officl~ I}t M..:magenu!lll &. Bud!le1
.4'29/20059:58 AM
Jeff Klatzkow
Assistant County Attomey
Date
Approved By
Coun1y Attottll!'Y
Counly A1torney OffiCI?
4129/200510:32 AM
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
Approv~d By
County Manaqer's Office
Office of Management & Budge1
5i::!/2D05 5:46 PM
J;lIJlf!$ V, Mudd
County Manag<<!'f
Datl~
Approved By
Board of County
Commissioner$-
COLlnty Manager's OMit-A!
SiJI2005 8:49 AM
Agenda Item No, 1682
May 10, 2005
Paoe 4 of 10
Westlake Outfall Improvement$"'
Project No. 510056
REQUEST FOR QUaT A TraNS UNDER CONTRACT # 04-3535
Due By: 4:00 pm. on Friday, April 08, 2005
PROPOSAL PAGE
The undersigned, as quater, hereby declares that he has examined the specifications and
informed himself fully in regard to all terms and conditions pertaining to the project and, if
this Proposal is accepted, to furnish same in full, according to the follow; ng:
To perform the work required by the specifications and drawings for the Westlake Outfall
Improvements.
Replacing the existing storm sewer with a 48" HDPE pipe, including all restoration
work as detailed.
Please complete all four (4) pages of the attached Bid Schedule and submit them
simultaneolisly with this Proposal Page.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this ..JU.h... day of
-.AIU:~, 2005 in the County of Collier in the state of
Florida
Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.
Firm's Complete Legal Name
Phone No. 239-435-7200
FAX No, 239-435-7202
Email: estimator@qe-usa.com and
hmurrell@qe-usa.com
3894 Mannix Drive. Suite 216
Address
Naples. FL 34114-1406
City, State, Zip
BY: fl<) () \ ~~
~{re
Vicp. Prf>sirlpnt
Title
Richard R. Slicko
Name Typed/Printed
4/8/05
Date
Page 80f8
8
Agenda Item No, 1682
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 10
c:::;.CJ~-y ~CJ-""" -........ ty
-- ---
Page 1 of 4
Stormwater Management Department
So, Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104. 239-732-2501 ' FAX: (239) 659-5790
REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS UNDER CONTRACT # 04-3535
Underground Utility Contract RFP 04-3535 of March 9th, 2004.
BID SCHEDULE SUMMARY
SCHEDULE "A"
Site Work
$ 168,750.00
SCHEDULE "B"
Drainage System / Utility
$ 317,062.50
SCHEDULE "e"
Restoration
$ 71,012.50
TOTAL BID AMOUNT:
Five Hundred Fifty Six Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty Five Dollars
(Words)
TOTAL BID AMOUNT
$ 556,825.00
(Figures)
Contractor Name:
Quality Enterprises USA, Inc,.
IThis Bid schedule has 4 pages, Please complete all 4 sheets and submit simultaneously
Your response must be received at the above address via mail, hand delivery or fax
no later than 4:00 pm, on Friday, April 08, 2005. Any response received after that
time shall not be considered. If you have any questions regarding the specifications,
lease contact Gianfranco Nicolaci at 239 213-5859, b fax at 239 659-5790.
G;\CAPITAL PROJECTS\510056 Westlake OulfalllmprovementsIExcel\[BidTab - Wesllake2,xls]bid summary
Agenda Item No, 1682
May 10,2005
Page 6 of 10
Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.
Westlake Outfall Improvements Project No. 510056
REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS UNDER CONTRACT #04-3535
Underground Utility Contract RFP 04-3535 of March gl", 2004.
SCHEDULE "A"
Page 2 of 4
SITE WORK
DESCRIPTION
UN!T I QUANTITY I UNIT COST I
TOTAL
A-1 Clearing and Grubbing (selective) LS
$125,000.00 $125,000.00
$ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00
$ 9,375.00 $ 9,375.00
$ 6,250.00 $ 6,250.00
$ 3,125.00 $ 3,125.00
$ 168,750.00
A-2 Earthwork LS
A-3 Erosion control LS
A-4 Testing services LS
A-S Lake cleaning (Aquatic vegetation removal) LS
Earthwork Sub-Total
EARTHWORK NOTES:
A-~,
Clearing, grubbing and preparation of all areas as designated by the Engineer in the field and then disposal of all
unwanted residue off the Owner's property complete, This ilem will also include removal of the existing storm sewer
pipe and lump sump structures.
A-2
Earthwork- including placement and compaction of flU to restore the roadway crossing and other areas to the elevations
shown on the plans, Compaction testing in roadway crossing. Fill of existing outfall swale is included,
IThis Bid schedule has 4 pages Please complete all 4 sheets and submit Simultaneously
Your response must be received at the above address via mail, hand delivery or fax
no later than 400 pm. on Friday, Apnl 08, 2005. Any response received after lIlat
time shall not be considered. If you have any questions regarding the specifications,
lease contact Gianfranco Nicolacl at 239 213-5859 b fal( at 239 659-5790
G \CAPIT AL PROJECTS\5 1005G Wesil~ke OulfnlllmprovCmenIS\Exce~[BidT"b - W"sllak,,2 xlsjSil" work
'.';""Oio..~....iiiiJjo;""'.AAlilIOio;4iiJjij"'''''i""'',''.~'''''
1-,
Quality Ent~rerl:1~, 13!32.
May 10, 2005
. Page 7 of 10
Westlake Outfall Improvements Project No. 510056
REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS UNDER CONTRACT #04.3535
Underground Utility Contract RFP 04-3535 of March 9lh, 2004.
SCHEDULE "8"
Page 3 of 4
DRAINAGE SYSTEM 1 UTILITY
B-1 48" RCP LF 36
B-2 48" HOPE - ADS Water Tight or Equivalent EA 1,440
B-3 Catch basin with Type J, AIL B str. bottom EA 6
B-4 Yard Drains EA 14
B-5 Outfall structure EA 1
B-6 48" Concrete Endwall EA
UNIT COSTI TOTAL
$ 250.00 $ 9,000.00
$ 156.25 $225.000.00
$4,937.50 $ 29,625.00
$2,187.50 $ 30,625.00
$6.562.50 $ 6.562.50
$9,375.00 $ 9,375.00
$6,875.00 $ 6,875.00
$317,062.50
DESCRIPTION
I UNIT I QUANTITY
B-7 Deflect existing 6" AC water main
LS
1
Storm Drainage Sub-Total
STORM DRAINAGE / UTILITY NOTES:
Furnishing and handling of all required materials, all excavation (including rock over excavation and/or demucking if
necessary), dewatering, bedding material (if necessary), rock removal and disposal off-site (if necessary),
installation, backfilling, compaction, compaction testing in roadway areas, final grading, coordinating with other
contractors and utility companies, flushing, cleanup, repair of any damage caused by construction and other items
necessary to complete the system and provide the owner with a complete working drainage system as shown on
the drawings and specified on these contract documents, All catch basins will be covered with filter fabric to
Construction stake out by contractor, incidental to applicable pay items,
Existing 6" water main shall be deflected under the storm sewer with mechanical fittings and joints.
CL2DO (C90D) PVC water main pipe shall be used (or equivalent DI). An air release valve shall also
be included in this pay item, Applicable costs associated with testing, bacteriological line clearance,
and connecting to the existing line shall be incidental to this pay item,
IThis Bid schedule has 4 pages. Please complete all 4 sheets and submit simultaneously
Your response must be received at the above address via mail, hand delivery or fax
no later than 4:00 pm. on Friday, April 08, 2005. Any response received after that
time shall not be considered. If you have any questions regarding the specifications,
lease contact Gianfranco Nicolaci at 239 213-5859, b fax at 239 659-5790.
GICAPIT^l PROJECTS\510055 Wesllake OutfalllmprovemenlslExcen[BidTab, Westtake2.xls)Slorm Drainage
AQenda m No,. 1682
Quality Enterpnses ~1(1-,IRro5
Page 8 of 10
Westlake Outfall Improvements Project No. 510056
REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS UNDER CONTRACT # 04-3535
Underground Utility Contract RFP 04-3535 of March 9th, 2004,
SCHEDULE "C"
Page 4 of 4
RESTORA TION
(Road crossing and Backyards)
DESCRIPTION
I UNIT I QUANTITY I UNIT COST I TOTAL
C-1 Type S Asphalt 1-1/4" SY
50 $ 50.00 $ 2,500.00
50 $ 43.75 $ 2,187.50
40 $ 43.75 $ 1,750.00
40,000 $ 0.63 $25.200.00
$ 6.2'lO.OO $ n.2'lO.OO
$ 2,500.00 $ 2.500.00
$ 12.500.00 $12.'l00.OO
$ 1,12'1.00 $ 1,17'1.00
$ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
$ 12.500.00 $12.500.00
$ 71.012.50
C-2 Type S-3 Asphalt 3/4" wearing surface SY
C-3 Valley Gulter LF
C-4 Sod (floratum) SF
C-5 Testing Services LS
C-6 Maintenance of Traffic LS
C-7 Sprinkler system repairs LS
C-B Recording video of pre-improvement conditions LS
Cog Surface Water Polution Prevention Plan - SWP3 LS
C-10 As-built drawings by a PSM (Professional Surveyor) LS
Restoration Sub.Total
RESTORATION NOTES:
Construction stake out by contractor.
This Bid schedule has 4 a es. Please com lete all 4 sheets and submit simultaneousl
Your response must be received at the above address via mail, hand delivery or fax
no later than 4:00 pm on Friday, April 08, 2005. Any response received after that
time shall not be considered If you have any questions regarding the specifications,
lease contact Gianfranco Nicolaci at 239 213-5859, b fax at 239 659-5790,
G:\CAP:T AL PROJECTS\51 0056 Westlake Outtalllm[Jrovements\Excel\[BidTab - Westlake2,xls]Resloralion
""';"'~~I""~'''I~''!liO-lIt''ilmi,"","OI.,.,;,,,,,.;;;,,,,,,,.,"..~
WORK ORDER # UC -103
Agenda Item No, 1682
May 10,2005
Page 9 of 10
"UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONTRACTING SERVICES"
Contract #04.3535
-,
This Work Order is for Underground Utility Contracting Services, subject to the terms and
conditions of the Contract referenced above, for Work known as:
PROJECT: Westlake Outfall Improvement
The work is specified in the proposal dated March 25, 2005 from Collier County Stormwater
Management Department, which is attached hereto and made apart of this Work Order, In
accordance with Terms and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above, Work Order # UC
- 103 is assigned to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.
Scope: Contractor to supply labor and material.
Schedule of Work: Complete within 40 days from the notice to proceed date, The contract
period can be increased accordingly for additional contingency work or rain delays,
liQuidated Damaaes: $256.00 Der day.
Compensation: The County will compensate the Firm in accordance with the amount provided
in the attached schedule.
TOTAL FEE $ 556.825.00 (see attached for bid form breakdown)
Any change made subsequent to final department approval will be considered an additional
service and charged according to an executed Change Order as enumerated in Exhibit D of
the Agreement.
PREPARED BY:
Gianfranco Nicolaci, Project Manager
Stormwater Management Department
Date
REVIEWED BY:
Ricardo Valera, P,E,. Director
Stormwater Management Department
Date
APPROVED BY:
Norman Feder, A.I.C,P" Administrator
Transportation Services
Date
ATTEST:
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Collier County, Florida
By:
Deputy Clerk
By:
Fred W. Coyle, Chairman
ATTEST:
(Corporate Secretary)
By: AI'd?t{uv..dP
. '.
_ ~ ~~~~~~_...:..~/r":"',,.,~
<";~' ...- ,.--
~,_...,., . -~ /.": ..
{~:::,,~_ ;~:;'~7~:~._1
...-;.-...,..""':...:...._--~.......- .-,~~/
..,..."....... -- .
Date
By:
Stac~y L. Murrell. Secretarv
(Print Nameffitle)
Approved as to Form and
Legal Sufficiency:
Assistant County Attorney
G:C:\Oocumont. end SoIting8\mcohon.QE1LII.ocol SetlingslTomporsry _ F1Io8IOlKl86\WO Quality Enterpr1_.doc
412212005
"iESTL~..\.KE Ol.TTF....\.LL Il\iII)RO\lEl\'IENTS
PROJE(~T LO(~_..\. TION l\:I....\.P
~
ocr:
...
(I)
i:i
COLLIER COUNry
BOAR,D OF COUNn' C01\:ThIIS~'IONERS~
ffiOJECT No, 510056
PINE RIDGE RD
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 10
Agenda Item No, 1683
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve award of a construction contract with Quality
Enterprises USA, Inc. for intersection improvements in the amount of $249,197.23
on Bluebill Avenue/111th Avenue at Vanderbilt Drive, Bid No. 05-3797
OBJECTIVE: To receive the Board of County Commissioner's approval of a construction contract for
intersection improvements on Bluebill A venue/111 th Avenue at Vanderbilt Drive.
CONSIDERATIONS: A total of 343 solicitation notices were sent out for this project. Four (4) bids
were received on April 14, 2005 for the construction of this project. The intersection of Bluebill
Avenue/111th Avenue and Vanderbilt Drive is currently experiencing severe operational deficiencies due
to long delays at peak hours. The proposed improvements will improve the traffic flow at this
intersection by adding an eastbound left turn lane on Bluebill A venue, adding a westbound left turn lane
and extending the westbound right turn lane on III th A venue, adding a southbound right turn lane on
Vanderbilt Drive, and miscellaneous drainage and sidewalk improvements at the intersection. Minor
signal modifications will also be done through the Traffic Operations Department as a part of this work.
The work is scheduled to be complete within seventy-five (75) days of the Notice-to-Proceed.
Bids were received from four contractors as follows:
,,-...
Quality Enterprises, Inc.
Bonness, Ine
$249,197.23
$261,304.31
Better Roads, Inc.
APAC Southeast, Ine
$275,615.40
$299,570.95
The in-house cost estimate was $253,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $249,197.23 are available in the Transportation Supported
Gas Tax Fund 313, Project 66065.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact resulting from this
project.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board award Bid #05-3797 "Bluebill Avenue/lllth Avenue at
Vanderbilt Drive" to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., and authorize the Chairman to execute the standard
contract after review and approval of the County Attorney.
Prepared by: Daniel G. Hall, P.E., Senior Project Manager, Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management Department
Attachment: Bid Tabulations
.---
,,""'-""
(
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 1683
May 10. 2005
Page 2 of 5
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
'683
Recommendation 10 approve award of a construction contract with Quality Enterprises
USA. Inc. for intersection improvements in the amount of $249,197.23 on Bluebill
Avenuei111th Avenlle at Vanderbilt Drive, Bid No_ 05-3797
511 0/2005 900.00 AM
Prepared By
Pr-o)ec1 Manaqcr
4/25;%005 9:54:02 AM
Daniel Hall
Date
Roo kinin Nauth
Transportion Services TEeM
Accountin9 l'e-cllllicion
Date-
Approved By
Trilns.portion Services
Transportation Adminis;tration
4/25/200511:50 AM
Brenda Srilhart
Purchasing Agent
Oat!'
Approved By
Admml,;troaljV(!'.Servlctl!l.
Purchasing
4125/200511 :53 AM
Dale A. Batho", P.E.
Date
Approved By
Trlltl!iflUrtiol1 SItNic:es
Prfnicipal Projl!Ct Manager
Transportation Engineering and
Construction
"J26/2005 1 :58 PM
Approved By
Mike Hauer
Administrative Services
Acquiiiition M.maOer
Date
Purchasing
4126/20058:59 AM
NorlTl E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Oivision Administrator
DatE'
Approved By
Transpo,tion SOlvi...e$
Trans.portatiulI Sr.rvicf!s Admin.
4i26/2005 2:"0 PM
Eugene Cqlvert
Princip31 Project Manager
Date
Approved By
Tnlllspurtations St~rvil:es
Transportation Engineering and
Construc1:ion Management
"126;2005 3:15 PM
('
Sham" N(!wrnan
Accounting SUJlr.rvisor
Date
Approved By
Trilnsportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/2.7/2005 "':52 PM
Pat Lehnhllrd
Ex"cutivc S(!(:r~tary
Datt!
Approved By
Transportation Servic.es
Transportation Service!. Admin
4/25/20058:08 AM
Approved By
Stevtl Camell
Administrative SI~rYicl~S
Pun::h"sin9/G0t,.~,ri.ll SVGS Oirq,c.tor
Date
PlJrchasing
4128/20061 Z:47 PM
Administrative- Assistant
Date
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
CO\lrl'ty Manager's Office
orficc of Management & Budglrl
4f26i2006 4;37 PM
Senior Management/Budget Analyt:.t
Ollte
Approved By
Susan Usher
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4129/200511:14 AM
Mk-h;wl Smykowll-kl
M..nn~~!ment & Budget Director
O.utl~
Approved By
County Man..ger'$ Office
Office of Management & Budget
4J29J200512:18 PM
Approved B)'
James V. Mudd
Boa,d of ComIty
Carnt'flisaiol1C!r:s.
County Managur
Date
County Manager's Otfk.e
4/30120051:30 PM
.r-
~
~
g'
~
'"
r,;
~
r::
'"
C
"
lD
lQ
CIl
So
e.>
...
~
0,
-I~
o ::.-
~"
Off
o CIl
~~
~~
6't 6't
.......
~~
88
6't 6't
...
I\)
en
U,
s::
lD
j
:7
o
1i"
l
:7
~
o'
o
o
j
r>
e.>
~
~
I\)
N
o
6't 6't
<D
1!l
1\)0)
~~.Sl:
e.>
~
~
~
o
~
:7
lD
CF.
o
o
o
j
r>
>
~
~
0"
o
o
j
r>
i
en
2
<I>
a-
s,
c:
e.>
~
N
-:;
>
~
~
tD
III
'"
<I>
g>
r::
iil
<I>
ifi
CD
e.>
');
tD
o
{.>
~
);
r%-
r::
!!l
f'-
~ ~
'en I....Cfl
':'1 ,_
~I : 1-6.'
~~ ;
0"
.i:!:
-I i -I
[el [e
/0 $: (") S:
g 41 g"l
6~' ;~'I
in en ;in~
s-< ~~
**
r.c;;
~
e.>o>
en (01
oc.n
I\)
e.>
Q,
8:8l
8lg
2:
~"..i.' Ii
.".
c.n.e.>
:-':-JI
981
* * 6't (,19 6't... '(,19", '" "':
I\)
~f
00)
:....~
e.>....
I\l
.0
-
01....
Ole.>
:,:..:.....
00>
....
01
"....i
.......
e.>o
~~
I\l
".,
"....i
.........
e.>o
Co:'"
.... ....
I :
. ,
I .
, ! .
I'".,: i
i.CDi I
1l)11e.>
10 I\l
~t~
01<D
... ...
-6't -Et't ~ 6't ~ ...; (ltl"" (;It (;It
....
..... e.>
I\l.....
c.n0l
88
... ...
I\)
b>.....
1\).....
c.nc.n
88
j I
....
I\)
~
0>0>
Co:"'"
oe.>
'" ....
-
I\)
N
".,
00>
00
00
I
.....
g,
8101
88
0)'
"....i
o
.... ".,
:"'c"
00>
... 6't
I\l
.~
e.>0l
-CD
;.",:.."
c.n0l
(,19 6't
I\)
e.>
in
-0)
..........
88
-
I
I I
g:~
I~i~
;dlu.
,....r....
I :
,
i '
l I
I I
, I
I '
!g:1
:. I
i~l~
818
i
,......:
g,
~O>
88
llil
c.n
~
en
S
g
~.
5'
.j
~
CD
o:i
@
::r
o
c:
c:
.!
Ol
:".
oe.>
1\l0
:""i\)
00
'CD
J1:o
'..... ...
0>-
~&l
I\l
"8:....
Ol\l
8~
6't ....
i
....
0)
o
,/..
IN
'0
0,
m
3
g-
::>
,..
3
CD
a
-I
~~
- ...
&>~
'" 0
;:CD
~~
~,::S
I '" '"
I
co
"....i
0).....
...0>
8Sl
.'" (,19.
e.>
in
Ole.>
0....
:,..:.."
O><D
6't ....
,
...
~~
00.
00
<D
Q,
0....
i?>l?>
!l)1!(;j
.... ...
........
0)
-....
g:g:
010
00
e.> -....
c.n 0101
~~ ~~
881 88
~
<
III
ao
O.
.j I
ifl
l<g
j!i!
-I
[~
&>~
~~
0:;1-::::
1\)0
e.>-<
'" 6't
!
II
!
....
o
:".
0>1\l
0)0
:"0
c.ntn
....1...., ,(,1>""
I .
.... I I........
..... ..........
8(.) ~~!
"'1\) -
:""'c.n CoCo
""""'-...J (,.)C,.)
'" '"
....
I\)
~
en
i>>
j
Q,
lD
a
II
lO
d~
s-
-"
0::1.
i fl
;::?
.:;;!!J
.... 6't
I
I\ll\l
~~
88
6't.....
I
I
~~
I\ll\l
tnOl
8'8
.... 6't
....
....
~
....
en
l>>
,..
!t
~
;r
j
lil
~
<I>
F
-I
o
~e
o=-
0-
!It"
r, ::I,
..... ~
t?
$'T1
........1
I .i'.
....
in
co
I\l....
i:D~
00
I
'.........
; I i
....
~
0....
8Sl
I........
e.>
11*!i~
CDj......
OJ (7)
!.... I.... 1
! I
, .
I i
~I~
j8!~:
1*/(,1>
i I
I !
1~11\l
'010)
1'810
: 0
....
jQ,
:0 -
'8 Sli
(,I> 6't
....
:".
...
co....
00
00
!
~
.....
o
I\)
<h
co
~ ~
j, <
lD III
0' j
ii' lil
s:: ~
<I> lD
I; i
~ ~
en ~
~' ~
:YJ ''''
I\) ~
o !:l
o !"
~ ~
m ! Q,
c;l~l'l d~~-Ie
l>>...2S;:;::o~
-" -"lDS
&> ~' g> ff -- C; 3'
OJ CD en CD 0 ~
--:::: -I- !ltb
la;m IJ;:m _r
o 0 .9~ .... en
.... *(It ....6't
~
:II~
~'O
.~!
I........
I ! '
I ,
,
I ,
, I
....
8~
8~
........
....
N
(l)e.>
.... ....
:,..0,
0....
........
CD
C/l1\)
0....
8Sl
... ...
...
.......
0-
88
.
....
o
I\)
~
(l)
.... ....
2N er ~II' em No. 1683
3IMay 10, 2005
~ Page 3 of 5
~~a~~
CD j CD C"
~lt~&
-g, g g, ;: ~
--0<....,
.O:.~CD
- ::1.3.........
l\) ti"O .....
8-a ::::
c.nO<::r
:0<1>>
~~~
-j
~iit
a
~
lD
5'
it
,
::I
o
<I>
So
-I
iil
~
~~
00
00
88
....e.-.
I.... .....
I\ll\)
~~
00
c"w
..........
~~
88
01 C/I
CoCo
... ....,
.... '"
>
I~
ill
10-1 ~
-I <1>0 ":;:'-1
oe;!!!.e oe
~S:~&>~ ~S:
o "r:- "," &> "
lil::>. -I~' ::I.
;;lil ?CD ~~
fjl3z i~@ ~en
....f.::: 1..9j...;l ~.:::SI
e.-. '" ~.,.... .... 6'ti
! -. i
n~: Ii
.'.'''
,f:;1il-
.~j~
I
........
I\ll\l
cncn
~~
88
......
I\ll\)
in in
88
88
*.-.
**
~~
~~
88
e.>e.>
I\)I\l
~~
88
i
-I~
~;:;
-"
0::1,
o lil
~?
2!!J
........
.... ....
tntn
~~
00
00
**
;;::
o
g
~
0'
j
i'
III
n
i
8
>
~
tD
o
j
j
i
'"
o
r::
lD
~
m
j
~
::L
'"
<I>
'"
~
=
~
:0
o
II>
Q,
'"
"
0..2-
as!
~s::
" III
o ::I
!all>
~...
B:
ll>
a ..
;;r=='
co:!:
. III
I\l:=
8-1
tnm
o
~
z
o
ao
o
<I>
'"
en
!1l
c...
l
CIl
I\)
!a
W
...., :::l ...., ...., I :::! '" '" ~ lG !\ ~ A.! e~ "..
.... .... ~ ..., ...., W
.... .... .... .... ~ ~ I\) Ft te ; Np.1
.:... 0, J. c:., ~ N
N J. , N ! .... iN 1~,
. .... ~
.... ".. 3~~ ~
J. ~ ~
~ '"
Jl G'l !;;! ~ :0 ~ & & ~ 0 :l: :l: 0 0
CD c: ~ ~ 0 "" "" 0 0
& is: ::J ::J CD CIl ::J ::J
g Q, Q, It ~ :I :I 0 ~
CD &l en ~. ~' iil a;
< c ~
<0 ::J < S' en CD ITI m li S'
ITI ::J e.. <I> SJ ~
<0 !r , c: en ::J ::J ~ 1J
!l, !" > 1J 0 Gl a: Q, 0. [2'
!!l. a I>> ~ -0 ill ~ ~ en en
~ ~ 0 ~ CD CD
~' :Ii ~ !!l. pr ~ II . 0
<0 3 r8 III
3 !" 2- ~ o' ITI c
1J CD en ~ ~
e1 ~ --I a 06' ~ ::J "
<0 ::J' 3: ::J ~ ~ ":: ~
<0 -::
I 3 III 3 III --I .... ~ ~
CD .. ~ ::J' ~ . ~
.... ~
a 0 ~ en ~
f Ii3 III iil C'l r9
J; (/l . .::!l
~ .... en ITI
~ ~ 0 g :0
0
.. 8' .::!l
~
-i I
d --I --I 0 --I
--Ie: pre: --Ie: Oe: --Ie: --Ie: ~~ ~~ -ie: o e: -ie: --I~ de: --Ie: -i~
o ::J ~2. o ::J ~~
2.i _::J ~::;: o 2. O~ 0:::: pr;::o: o ::J 0;::0: pr~ o ::J ~::;:
1J"" 1J- pr- ~" -"" pr"" ~." pr""
!!!.1J :1." -0-0 1J --0 ~~ i-o --0 0-0 _-0 0" _1J
~'~ -1J
-0 ::J. 2~ ~ ~. 1J ~. " ~. ~5' ~g' i ::J. ~~ o::J, o ::J. 0 5' 05'
~' 2 ~ ::J, -2 102 !!l.2
~~ 2 l~ ....<1> 0 CD 0<1>
i3b 'N"m ~I ~i en~ ~~ *~ ~~ !!l.~ 8? !!l. ? !!l.~
"? l:iJ.5 ~~ IU) ai~ 3~ 0> 'oi
....en ~~ .... "'L~ iEll:!l lJJ
~, ~.::;.
4It 4It 4It 4It 4It 4It 4It (,/0 4It (,/0 (,/OCo/t (,/0(,/0 {I't{l't {I't(,/O ~~ (,/O~ (,/0 (,It 4It (,/0 (,/O~ [~{~
'! ~.:;~:
!el
! j~~
,!Jii
Ii
.... ~f~
WW .... .... I\) I\) '" ...., "'.... .... .... '"
~~ en .... .... 1\)1\) kJ ~ ~~ ~".. ~~ :88 w '" 18
..., ....,...., 8.... ~8: :~ ~ 8.... l5~ ~g:
1\)0 w.... 00.... ....,'" 00
88 ig~ 8~ 8~ 88 88 8~ a,QD 88 ~~ 88 88 88 88 ../.
0.0 ~S:8
(,/Oi6'l '~(,/O ".._-
(,/0(,/0 ... ~ 4It 4It ... ... 4It .. .. 4It 6'116'1 ~(,/O 1(,It!~ 6'1 4It ~ 4It (,It 6'1 (,It (,It
, ! ' ! I
I
I I
I
I I
I ....
I .... .... .... ,I\) I\) ~ CD.... .... .... ~-6 W ....
~~. .... ..... ..... '" .... .... en ...... kJ -""'1>> ~~ .....w w....
~o :::ig: ~.... l5~ ",en g:w 8l.... .... 00 :t:~ ....,'" "'0 "'''' ~m
1\)1\) 00'" w w ........., ....'"
~~ lil8l 8~ 8~ ~~ ~~ gi5 NO> 0<0 Crt:... ~~ ~~ 8~ ~~ ~~
0000 ........ 01\) 00 I\)W ........
-
.... 6'1 (,It (,It (,It 4It {I't 6'1 {l'tf<'l (,/0(,/0 fi'i(,/O (I't 6'1 fi'ifi'i 6'1 fi'i 6'1 6'1 6'1 fi'i fi'ifi'i 6'1 fi'i 6'1 6'1
I
.... .... .... I
~~ .... I\) I\) .... W .... ....
-...., N 8l", ~~ Co Co en.... 1>> ~~ 0000 -...., CD ~!5
1\)1\) ...., 0000 g:l.I1 ...., g:.... 88 CD.... ....,...., ~~ 8~
l.I1l.11 l.I10 ....,.... NN 1\)1\) OIW I\)N "'l.I1
88 ~~ ~~ 88 s~ SS 8 ill lilg: g8 ~~ 88 88 8~ 00 OUt
00 00
-
6'1 4It .... 6'1 6'1 6'1 6'1 fi'i 4It 4It 4It 4It 4It .... 6'1 6'1 fi'i 6'1 .... 6'1 fi'i(:lt 4It 4It 4It 4It fi'ifi'i 4It fi'i
I
i
,
I
: ....
I .... .... .... N .... ~ ....,..... ..... .... 00 W ....
"'01 .....1 .... ..... "'" .... .... u. ~ kJ..... ~~ ............ w..... ~g ~8
g:g: 00' 8~ I\) "'''' l?:ll?:l ~W "'...., o~ ~~ CD....
NO (/l .... OICIT "'.... 00 00
88 N~ 88 8~ 88 88 gi5 8~ 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
OICIT
r-
6B3
2005
of 5
O:$:itDtD
C:~lico
~aiil~"
~~ll=~
2:=o'~~
......O~CD<O
!'- ~. 3" ~ ~
8<1>~ =
ClTO<!f
8~~
....::J
~iiT
a
,..~,
-
(
1J
o~,
all
~f
o ::J
!!l.1II
<1>0
0.<>>
1!:::-l
I>> 0
g.~
.00 s
~-=
0-1
(I11T1
o
:l:
r
z
o
1%
1:
(J)
CD
;;
W
"'"
W
e
.
"
III
(Q
..
c.>
So
c.>
:E )> -.J :::t ::: :::t ::: -.J -.J
G> c.> Ij~ ~~1
=i m "'-I - - -
z ~ ~ ~ ~ c:, c.>
m ~ ~ 0> ()! T.
CJ) ~ N ~p 3gie :;
CJ) ~ :!: ~
G> al C -I -I -I -I -I -I
q; q; ~ iil iil iil iil iil iil
~ ::I 3l g; g; ~ ~ ~
Q. 0
:E III b
lXI' CJ) !:'1 !:'1 !:'1 CJ) CJ)
::T ~ i ~ ~
::I' ::I, ~. ~' @.
CD 3'
III ~ 0'" ~
::l. !!' ~ CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ)
CIl
~~ C 0 Q. Q. 0 ~
: CJ) ::I JS: ~ JS: JS: ~
"- I~ c.
'" CD -I ;:j -l -I ~
a -l
"'~ )> -I ::I' ::T ::T ::T
::, , m a .. '" CD CD CD CD
:i: <: 3 3 3 3 3 3
m ::I
r-- 0 Z Q. 0 0 0 0 ~ ~
~ /J 0 -I ~ ~ b b 'O! 'O!
m ,:i: I\)
I z 0 -)> ~ ~ "i :E
~ " CJ)-l ~ :E
I ~ -1m -( :E :E ::T
~' " 0 !!. ::I'
O:II 0" ::T 2: ::I' ::.-
l::l ~ )> 0-1 6' .!-
0 " "> .!. ::.- ~ .!-
i ^ Z:II m CJ)' .!. .!-
I ~~ "m :II C:i:
Cz ffi -l
00 al)> 0 -l ~
-IJ: Z Oz ~ -l 0 -I -l -I
r- 0 Oc ~c ~;: ic o cl ~;: ic ~c
m OCJ) m z" r- i::l
0 2!~ 0 -I)> ~S: ,,::I " 2, -::I
III ::.- ~.= ::.- ,,::.- ""
G> lXI " ~~ ;P."'D " 2';; ~"
m 5 ~~ l:; "" !il "'ll ::L "'ll ::I, "'ll
al OC ::I ::I, ~ ::I. ::t, ! ::t, !il ~ ~i'l' !il~
0 5 '" f.l'! !il c;,,!il !
'7< lXI -l:II
0 m,)> 0 Om III ? 8l? ... 'i:~ .~ wi--
Z Z CIllO m :II:II ~ ~~ en - r- ,;S ~S 1\),
, 0 -1-1 :II CJ)CJ) en.::!! CD_~ 0>" ~"
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
,
I I
I I I I
I -( I-(!-( -('-( -(-( I~ I I i
.. 13: '3: (DieD CD CD I !
'" "'I'" '" '"
-
, CD - I\)
I I~, 0.0> ~ a. ~ ~- b
8~ "'" "'" CD
I , c.>1\) ""'0 1\)(,) (,)0 -.Jo
. I 88 i\):"" ~~ ~~ :"'i:D ~i!l ~~
I CDI
()! 0101 oen
I ... ... .... .... (;t (;t .... ... ... ... ... ... ... (;t (;t
-( -(-( -(-( ~ -(I
CD CD CD C1I CD ~I
en en en en en '" 1\). J
I ~ - -
~ 0. c.> 8l c.> &: a. -
I co()! ~I\) I\) (.0) I co
"'" (.0)0) 00 "'-II\) c.>- CD 01 ~o
~ 0.:'" :,..:,.. 0:'" :""'i:D ~:,.. :.....:,.. t81
I 001 00> en en 1\)1\) "'" - en()!
... ... ... .... ... (;t ... ....(;t tit ... (;t (;t (;t (;t
1
I I
I , I
I
-( ~~ -( -('-(1-< I
CI) CD CI) C1I C1I
I en en U> en U> en en II\)
"'" ,
~ ()! I\) I\)
0.- Co> ~ ~ ::::i i\) -
co I\) co -.J 0> 80
-.J en-.J co I\) eno 01 Co> co- coo
i\) 8g: ~t 0,0. o~ c"o, i\181 :"'c"
I w ""'0> 001 Ngo ""'-
(;t (;t (;t (;t (;t (;t (;t .... .... .... (;t .... .... .... ...
-( ~ ~ ~~ -(-( !
CI) CD CI) I
... ... ... .. ... U> ... I\)
UI co I\) I\)
~ ~8 :!: b &w 0> i\) N
I\) ~- .... "'"
01 01\) coo -.Jo wo
I :,.. 88 ~o. <co. 88 8~ 0,0. o~
0 01(11 (11(11 0101 0(11
I
I II I
I I
e
.
683
2005
of 5
~~a9"-
CD~CD'
;;.~;~
"g,gg,;:c:;
--O<-.J
.....O~CD<o
.""'~, 3':': ""
~CD~ ~
enO<:f
:IlCD)>
rg~~
-::I
-liT
a
"'ll
0.2-
aa
C1I :i:
"Ill
o ::I
!!till
CD--
?
~
III
;:; -
::T'"
goJ:
. III
1\).=
8-1
O1m
o
:i:
z
o
a.
lil
U>
fe
Agenda Item No. 16B4
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 10
_.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve a change order in the amount of $73,289.40 to Quality
Enterprises USA, Inc. amending the Pine Ridge Subdivision Emergency Culvert
Replacement Project (project No. 510201) construction contract and to approve the
associated budget amendment including an additional $5,000 contingency amount.
OBJECTIVE: To receive Board of County Commissioners' approval of a change order
amending a work order with Quality Enterprises USA, Inc. adding additional construction
services for the Pine Ridge Subdivision Emergency Culvert Replacement Project in accordance
with the Underground Utility Contracting Services Contract No. 04-3535.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Stormwater Management Department of the Transportation
Services Division has received many complaints of poor drainage within the Pine Ridge
Subdivision. The origin of many of these complaints can be attributed to the current condition of
the corrugated metal drainage pipe installed decades ago. Most pipes have exceeded their
service life and are in a state of failure due to corrosion. One of the first sections of pipe targeted
for replacement was the interconnect pipe between Warbler Lake and Lake Bunting. This pipe
runs west to east under Hickory Road several hundred feet north of Carica Road connecting this
two-lake system to the ditch along the west side of Goodlette-Frank Road. The pipe was
collapsing in several locations blocking the area's main stormwater outfall conveyance system
,- and creating unsafe conditions in several locations as four-foot deep holes were opening up when
sections of the pipe gave way.
On February ] 8, 2005 an emergency contract was awarded to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc. in
the amount of$180,867.]0 to remove the existing pipes and replace them with new polyethylene
pipe. Work began on April] 1, 2004. Additional unanticipated work is currently necessary in
order to upgrade two locations where the new drainage pipe crosses over existing County water
distribution mains, Sprint, and FPL cable within the Hickory Road sixty-foot right of way. ]t is
necessary to dip both water mains below the bottom of the new drainage pipe to maintain the
hydraulic flow line required for positive stormwater conveyance while adhering to current
Florida State Statutes regulating construction of new and rehabilitated public water distribution
systems.
This additional work exceeds the ten percent contingency amount originally anticipated and
included in the project budget. Additional funding needed for this project will be transferred
from funds allocated for the Avalon School Ditch Improvement Project (Project No. 51] 072).
Construction of the Avalon School Ditch Improvement Project is rescheduled for FY 06.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funding in the amount of$19,132.90 is available in Fund 301, Project No.
51020], Pine Ridge Subdivision Pipe Replacement. A budget amendment is needed to transfer
$59,156.50 from Project No. 511072, Fund 301, Avalon School Ditch Improvement Project for
the additional funding including a $5,000.00 contingency.
The source of funding is ad valorem taxes.
r
Agenda Item No. 1684
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 10
,~.-..
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: The Emergency Pine Ridge Subdivision Culvert
Replacement and Drainage Improvement project is in accordance with the goals and objectives
ofthe Drainage Sub-element of the Growth Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners:
(1) Approve Change Order Number 1 for the Pine Ridge Subdivision Emergency Culvert
Replacement Project;
(2) Direct the Board Chairman to execute the Change Order on the Board's behalf; and
(3) Approve the necessary budget amendment.
Prepared by: Jerry Kurtz, Project Manager, Transportation Services Division, Stormwater
Management Department.
Attachments: (1) Change Order; (2) Contractor's Proposal (3) Budget Amendment, (4) Contract
Modification Checklist Form, (5) Work Order
,,-
~
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting D.'.
Agenda Item No 16B4
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 10
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1684
Recommendation to approve a change ofdef in the amount of $73,289.40 to Quality
Enterprises USA, Inc. amending the Pine Ridge SubdivisIon Emergency Culvert
Replacement Project (Project No. 510201) construction contract and to approve the
associated budget amendment including an additionai $5,000,00 canlingency amoum
5110/2005900.00 AM
Prepared By
Senior Ennineer
<1'261'20054:06:26 PM
Gm'ald Kurt?
Transportion Services
0...
Stormwafer Management
Accounting Supervisor
lla1.
Appro.... By
Sharon Newtrn'ln
TnlllSport;on Services
Transportation Adminis:tration
4/2612005 5:29 PM
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
Approved By
Nann E. Feder, AICP
TTiIl\$portiof) SI~lvice$
Trun5puttutiun Services. Admin.
4/26/2006 5:36 PM
GeF'3ld Kurtz
S~nior Engineer
Date
Appro.ed By
Tran.s.portiorl Services
$Iormwater Management
4J26/200S 6:." PM
Approved By
Steve Camell
Administrative Services
Purcha50ing/General SVC5 Director
Date
Purchasing
~127/2005 8,01 AM
Rharal" Rnmbert
Coutnl(:t Sp~lC:i<llh.t
Duttl
Approved By
Administrative Services
Purchuing
"'/28/20058:28 AM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attomny
Ass,~tant County Attorney
Date
Couuty Attorney Offic~
012812005 8,41 AM
Pat lehnhard
Executive Secretary
0...
Approved By
Transportation Services
Transportation Servit:lu. Admin
4/28/200512:17 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
County Manager',S Office
Adrnini!.trativr. AS5istun1
Datl~
Ofrice of Management & Budget
4129120057:48 AM
Director
Dale
Approved By
Ricardo Valera
Transportion Services
Stormwate,.- Management
4f29/200S 2:07 PM
SeniDr Mona'ilometltlBudget An..IY!it
0...
Approved By
Susan Usher
emllltv Mnua!ll~r'!i Office
Office of Managemlmt <<. Btlliget
4/29/2005 3:56 PM
Management & Budget Director
Oat.
Approved By
Michael Sm'lkowski
COl.lJrty Matlllger's Ofl'icC'
Office Df Management & Budget
61312006 UO PM
County Manager
Date
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County MlIllngcr-'s ottil:e
514/2005 12:<12 PM
TO:
Mr. Lou Gaudio, Project Manager
Quality Enterprises USA Inc.
3894 Mannix Drive No. 216
Naples, FL 34114
CHANGE ORDER TO WORK ORDER # 1
FROM:
Mr. Dereck Moorley, Project Manager
Stormwater Management Department
2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Suite 214
Naples, FL 34104
Agenda Item No, 1684
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 10
Project Name: Pine Ridge Subdivision Pipe Replacement
Work Order Dated: 02/18/05
Change Order No.: I
Project No. 510201
Work Order No. UC - 079
Date: April 26, 2005
Cbange Order Description: An additional $73,289.40 is necessary in order to resolve
several utility conflicts, not projected in the original scope. This consists of $ 1 6,500 and
$20,500 for a 12" and 16" water main deflection respectively, $ 1 1, 000 for two conflict
boxes, $7,000 for two air release valves (ARVs) that must be incorporated into the water
main deflections along with $18,289.40 for mobilization and restoration costs.
Original agreement amount ...... ........ ....... ...... .......... ...................... $ I 80,867.00
Sum of previous change orders (ass or subtract.........................$O.OO
This Change Order No. I Amount (add or subtract)....................... $73,289.40
Revised Agreement Amount .......................................................... $254,156.40
Original contract time in calendar days ....................................................30 days
Adjusted number of calendar days due to previous change orders.....................O days
This change order adjusted time is........................................................ ..25 days
Revised Contract Time in working days.. ......... ........ ... .... ............ .............55days
Original Notice to Proceed date ............................................... April 19, 2005
Completion date based on original contract time....................... May 18, 2005
Revised completion date due to change order(s)...................... June 12,2005
Your acceptance of this change order shall constitute a modification to our Agreement and
will be performed subject to all the same terms and conditions as contained in said
Agreement indicated above, as fully as if the same were repeated in this acceptance. The
adjustment, to this Agreement shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims
arising out of, or related to, the change set forth herein, including claims for impact and delay
costs.
Prepared by: Date:
Dereck Moorley, Project Manager
Stormwater Management Department
Accepted by:
Mr. Lou Gaudio, Project Manager
Quality Enterprises USA Inc.
Date:
Approved by:
Ricardo Valera, P.E. Director
Stormwater Management Department
Date:
Change Order No, 1
Pine Ridge Subdivision Pipe Replacement
Page 2
Approved by:
Norman Feder, A.IC.P., Administrator
Transportation Services
Reviewed by:
Stephen Y. Carnell, Director of Purchasing/General Svcs.
Reviewed by:
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow
Assistant County Attorney
Date:
Date:
Date:
Approved by: Date:
Fred W. Coyle, Chairman, Board of County Commissioners
Agenda Item No. 16B4
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 10
Agenda Item No, 1684
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 10
GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING THE
CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECK LIST FORM
1. Document circumstances prompting the changers) request by...
a. Identifying who initiated the change request
b, Identifying the nature of the change
2. Analyze the change request to determine:
a. The hard and soft costs of the change and the appropriateness of each
b. The benefits of the change
c. The impact(s) of the change on the project
d. The impact of the change on the overall success/failure of the project
3. If the change is deemed justified, review the original contract to determine or verify...
a. Whether the change is consistent with existing project scope
b. The existing terms and conditions (e.g.; price and schedule)
c. That the proposed change is not included within the existing scope
d. The protocol for authorizing changes to the agreement
4. Document the analysis of and the justification(s) for the change.
5. Obtain preliminary review and input from one of more of the following:
a. Other project managers
b. Immediate supervisor
c. Appropriate 3rd party consultants
d, Purchasing Contract Specialist
e. County Attorney Office
f. Risk Management Department
g. Other County departments materially impacted by the change.
6. Certify the appropriateness of the change based on the information gathered in steps 1-5.
7. If the change is not deemed justified, notify the appropriate parties and include the
documentation gathered to date in the project file.
8. If the change is deemed justified, identify the appropriate contract instrument and clearly state
the benefit or value that the change has to the project. . (Change Order, Amendment, Work
Orders or Supplemental Agreement).
9. Prepare and process the change document in accordance with...
a. The terms and conditions of the existing agreement
b. The County's Contract Administration Procedures.
c. Check the numbers and percentages for accuracy.
d. Sign the Contract Modification Form
e. Submit the form with back up documentation attached to Purchasing for review
Form Retrieved From:
IIForms/County Forms/Purchasing FormslContract Modification Checklist
Revised 12/23/04
Page 1 of3
Agenda Item No. 16B4
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 10
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridae Subdivision Pipe Replacement
PROJECT #: 510201
BIDIRFP #: 04-3535
MOD#:
1
AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $ 73.289.40
PO #: 4500043962
Work Order #: UC-079
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 180.867.00 CURRENT $ 254.156.40
(STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
Last BCC Approved Amount $ NIA
(LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval
NIA
Agenda Item # NI A
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractIWork Order: $ 73.289.40
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount 40.5 %
Formula: (Current Amount 1 Last BCC approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section !lI.CA.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: 5/18/05
CURRENT: 6/12/05
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE: An additional $73,289.40 is necessary to assist in
resolvina several utility conflicts, not proiected in the oriainal scope. This consists of $16,500 and
$20,500 for a 12" and 16" water main deflection respectively. $11. 000 for two conflict boxes.
$7,000 for two air release valves (ARVs) that must be incorporated into the water main deflections
alona with $18.289.40 for mobilization and restoration costs.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the
project? This chanae order is necessary to complete the proiect safely and to adhere to State
Law that reQulates separation distance between public water distribution systems and other buried
underQround utilities.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: County Utilities Dept, FPL, Stormwater
Manaaement Dept Director, Quality Enterprises USA Inc.. Transportation Division Admin.
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, Nor N/A)
l Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
_ Y _ Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
...::J.. Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
-.:t. The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
-.:t. Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
PROJECT MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: This form is to be signed and dated.
Revised 12/23/04
Page 2 of3
APPROVED BY: Date:
Jerry Kurtz, Principal Project Manager
REVIEWED BY: Date:
Contract Specialist
Revised 12/23/04
Page 3 of3
Agenda Item No, 1684
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 10
~_.,.........w..._._.,m."w
~
Agenda Item No. 1684
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 10
~1:
0lWJTV
EN'T'ERPRISES
USA..INC.
t.k:.. !ItC~""6-:rtt;.~
~.prii 25, 2005
SENT \I'IAFAX AND RttST ....-:L..+\SS MAIl..
Mr, JatTy ~ P .E...Project M.anag.tY
CuUifU'Connty Sttlm1waterMllnagement
liSS ~.Oriv~Snu.
Napl~ Etotida 34HJ4
IlEt .f'meRidxe SuWh:isIoa
nrainagelmprmremenb
Dear L\fr. KlUtZ:
Please fmdbclClw ;ac,t,']l'"t1.1i'lcrt~~ijite. 0f.tlw ehanp order for the. obove referenced.. projcc:t.. As
menn()ned previouslY, Q\\alityEtite:rptises USA, Ine. willreqnire B.J] addirinrutll0 working: days
fur tbe additi-cmal wQJ:ltpfu... th~ time from-wtum we pull 0l'1:'4he pmjec.110 when we:start baCk up.
It is mmc:it'~ed that ()Uf last ~'{.Tfdngday \.11\ the JTt'ojeet Vim be Tuesday April 26. "2005,
Item No. 1: .. U- WatC!':U1a.ID O-efl~tiQn .~ Materials... $5 ,800.00,I..abor "" 5.'.100.00 Night time
diff'ercutia:.l.t;!" :H.UUO~OO., Tot.Ed = S16.JOO.OO
I~ Nt, Z~ 2 Cmtl1ict boxes - Ma:terv,at = S2.s()ol'ta x 2= 15,000,00. l..a'b:6:r *' S3.(l(){j.OOlea x. 2 ..
S6.(X)Q,OO. Total ~$ll.HOo.OO
}~Nfh3; 2 AR.V'",- ,Material = $1.4S0.{)(}f-ea xl. = $2.900.00. t.abcw.... $1,U'5-fUlt'Ve.ax 2 =
$4.100.00. T:ota! "'" $ 7.00{tt.l{i
}t.em NfAr l4$~'W~tkHeef.ott - Material = S.8,;600.00~ LalmT. .....SiO.900,fJ{J Night time
di~ = $1 ,,~.{)f}, 'f~.;;;o 120,.9JO.00
hem ~45; l)riv~ay R~mioo t,63Osf - Stabiiizatilln@$1.75fs.f-;a S%.,sS2,sO. limerook @
$3.63/sf-= $5~91.6_90.Pavers @$4lsf~ S6,520Jm, TGtn.I=lU~g9,4(f
Item ~"'''\ii ~ '''' $3~fJOtH')O
Grady..I.,-. Ne~l.dtn1 .. .;, I ~"".46'
p~ watad: medit'lll'df)"~m you have un}' <ra-estiom.
'ver,., tru~!YJ . .
-'~."~.~ ..... .-
.' /~ .
L,.........J.i;lli~ J. Gaudio
PR)j~tM~
{~d
~EE ~~CH3S~' dH
:ro.:fA r;e.;ImOf'lt Cot..w t
.Atan:a, ~ 3r;:l340
ibl!J] ne-OO:tS
F_ f-61~ ;i2&(.l()3~
WdZJ:Zl suoz sa Jd~
2DA f:~ll~'n -:\'Mf+o
C~p_h!<. 'JljI, 2J~2i)
p5n Ha-GOOQ
f<y.t:! 5.]15~g2600
~4r..'0lnt~D:n>te, ;;'...1"" 21~
N.7p,~ R...l'f? t~S4t'P:,
tI3<t~ 05-7201)
F,u \;:J"'~ li;35-1202
WORK ORDER # UC - 019
Agenda Item No. 1684
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 10
"UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONTRACTING SERVICES"
Contract #04-3535
This Work Order is for Underground Utility Contracting Services, subject to the terms and
conditions of the Contract referenced above, for Work known as:
PROJECT: Pine Ridge Subdivision Pipe Replacement
The work is specified in the proposal dated February 18. 2005 from Collier County
Stormwater Management Department which is attached hereto and made. apart of this Work
Order. In accordance with Terms and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above, Work
Order # UC . 019 is assigned to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.
Scope: Contractor to supply labor and material.
Schedule of Work: Complete within 30 days from the notice to proceed date.
Liquidated Damaaes: $256.00 per day.
Compensation: The County will compensate the Firm in accordance with the amount provided
in the attached schedule.
TOTAL FEE $ 180.861.10 (see attached for bid form breakdown)
Any change made subsequent to final department approval will be considered an additional
service and charged according to an executed Change Order as enumerated in Exhibit D of
the Agreement.
PREPARED BY: ~,1c ~l2y
Dereck Moorley., Projec ger
Stormw ter Man ent Department
0'3 / ott I D"~
Date I
--b3/tJ7/0S-
Date
.J(;:~J
Date
ATIEST:
(Corporate Secretary)
By:AVf{u4
Stacey L. Murrell, Secretary
(Print Name/Title)
By:
, Vice President
G:C:IDocumenls and Settingslmcohen,QE_FLllocal SeltingslTemporary Internel FileslOLK 1 861Worll Order. Quali1y Enterprise 2-23-05.doc
2/2512005 '
Agenda Item No. 1685
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to allow the Transportation Division to advertise and receive
bids for proposed roadway and drainage improvements to Goodlette-Frank Road
from Golden Gate Parkway to Pine Ridge Road, Project No. 60005. Estimated
fiscal impact is $12,000,000.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain the Board of County Commissioners approval for bidding roadway and
drainage improvements to Goodlette-Frank Road from Golden Gate Parkway to Pine Ridge Road.
CONSIDERA TIONS: The design plans and specifications for the widening of Goodlette-Frank Road
from 4 lanes to 6 lanes from Golden Gate Parkway to Pine Ridge Road have been prepared and are ready
for bidding. The project construction schedule calls for the work to be completed within 16 months
following the issuance of the Notice to Proceed (NTP) letter. It is anticipated that NTP will be given by
early August, 2005. The schedule for the work has an early completion phase. This phase consists of the
improvements to the Golden Gate Parkway intersection; the construction of a right turn bypass road from
Golden Gate Parkway to Goodlette-Frank Road; construction of the northbound lanes on Goodlette-Frank
Road and the sidewalk to Clubhouse Drive (Wilderness CC entrance); improvements to the traffic signals
at Golden Gate Parkway and 22nd Avenue, North; and the installation ofa new traffic signal at Clubhouse
Drive. Completion of this phase is within four months after the issuance of the NTP. The early
completion phase and all the work shall be completed within the timeframes noted, and liquidated
damages will be assessed should the work not be completed per the design plans and specifications.
.-
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Transportation Supported Gas Tax Fund and Road
Impact Fee Funds. Source of funds are Gas Taxes and Impact Fees.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: As a capital improvement element in the Five Year
Transportation Work Program, the widening of Goodlette-Frank Road from Golden Gate Parkway to Pine
Ridge Road is a part of Collier County's Growth Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners allows the Transportation Division
to proceed with the improvements to Goodlette-Frank Road from Golden Gate Parkway to Pine Ridge
Road as described herein and authorizes the Administrator to start the bidding process.
PREPARED BY: Allen R. Ruth, P.E., Senior Project Manager, Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management Department
",-----.
Agenda Item No. 16B5
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 3
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
1685
Meeting Date
Recommendation to allow the Transportation Division to advertise and receive bids for
proposed roadway and drainage improvements to Goodlelte-Frank Road from Golden
Gate Parkway to Pine Ridge Road, Project No, 60005. Estimated fiscal impact is
$12,000.000,
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Allen R. Ruth, P.E.
Date
Senior Project Manager
4/26/2005 8:43:56 AM
Transportion Services
Transportation Engineering and
Construction
Approved By
Brenda Brilhart
Purchasing Agent
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/26/20059:16 AM
Approved By
Mike Hauer
Acquisition Manager
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/26/2005 9:25 AM
Approved By
Lisa Taylor
Management/Budget Analyst
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/26/200510:12 AM
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General Svcs Director
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/26/2005 1 :08 PM
Approved By
Eugene Calvert
Principal Project Manager
Date
Trans portations Services
Transportation Engineering and
Construction Management
4/26/20053:18 PM
Approved By
Sharon Newman
Accounting Supervisor
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/26/20055:12 PM
Approved By
Norm E, Feder, AICP
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Services Admin,
4/28/20057:24 AM
Approved By
Pat Lehnhard
Executive Secretary
Date
Transportation Services
Transportation Services Admin
4/28/2005 8:23 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 7:46 AM
Agenda Item No, 1685
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 3
Approved By
Susan Usher
Senior Management/Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 11 :20 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/200512:06 PM
Approved By
James V, Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4/30/2005 1 :01 PM
Agenda Item No. 1686
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 10
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the Purchase Agreement and Accept the Warranty
Deed for the fee simple acquisition of property from Lori Hamilton, Successor
Trustee of the TPJ, Inc. Irrevocable Trust for the purpose of providing Wiggins
Pass Outfall with an unobstructed sheetflow of water in the area known as the
Wiggins Bay Basin. Project 512122.
OBJECTIVE: To receive the Board of County Commissioner's approval to acquire property in the
Wiggins Bay Basin. Acquiring the property will enable the Stormwater Department to complete the
stormwater conveyance project to restore unobstructed sheetf10w in the area.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Wiggins Bay Basin is an area of approximately 3.6:!: square miles that is
located on both the east and west sides of US 41 in the North Naples area which leads out to the Gulf of
Mexico. The land surrounding Wiggins Pass is an area that is almost fully developed and includes a mix
of residential, commercial and light industrial use properties.
,.,...-,.."
On August 26, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners stated their support with the project undertaken
by Storm water Management to correct the serious flooding and drainage problems experienced within the
Wiggins Bay drainage basin area during heavy rains. Money was appropriated in the Fiscal Year 2004
budget for land acquisition for the purpose of preserving a natural drainage flow way area; however, this
one remaining parcel had alluded the county for nine years due to the owner's unwillingness to sell the
vacant property (See Exhibit "A"). The property was held in a Trust and over a period of years, three
separate Trustees were named to oversee the property. The current Trustee, Lori Hamilton, determined
that it was in the best interest of the Trust to sell the property to the County. The parcel was appraised for
$162,500 and the negotiated price of $185,000 was within the Board's acceptable range of fair market
value. County Staff has also agreed to pay the owner's attorney's fee of$I,525.00.
The construction of this Project is part of the County's long range planning effort and it remains the sole
parcel needed in order to complete a critical connection in the Wiggins Bay basin.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $186,525.00 to cover the acquisition of the property and
the attorney's fee, and recording fees not to exceed $44.00 are available in the County-Wide Capital
Improvement Fund (301) under Wiggins Pass Outfall Project (512122). Source of funds is Ad Valorem
taxes.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This recommendation is consistent with the County's Growth
Management Plan.
,.....-...
Agenda Item No, 1686
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 10
RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
I. Approve the attached Purchase Agreement;
2. Accept the recordation of the attached Warranty Deed;
3. Direct Staff to complete all tasks necessary to properly acquire and record this parcel, including
payment ofthe owner's attorney fees in the agreed upon amount of $1,525.00;
4. Although not anticipated, approve any budget amendments necessary to implement the collective
will of the Board.
PREPARED BY: Hope Brack, Senior Property Acquisition Specialist, Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management Department
Attachments: (I )Aerial of Property (2)Purchase Agreement (3)Warranty Deed
..-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Approyed By
Nonn E. Feder, AICP
Transporticm Servlc.Cl>
Agenda Item No. 1686
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 10
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16B6
Recommendation to approve the Purchase Agreement and Accept 1Me Warranly Deed for
the fee &imple acquisition of properly from Lori Hamilton. Successor Trustee of the TPJ.
Inc_ Irrevocable Trust for the purpose of prov~ding \fViggins Pass Outfall wfth an
unobstructed sheetflow 01 water in the area known as the Wiggins Bay Basin. Project
512122. ($186,525)
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Transportation Division Administra10r
Date
Tran.porta1ion Services Admin.
4f26'7Q05 5:36 PM
Accotlntiny SUJWrvitwr
Date
Approved By
Shanm Nnwln.m
Tran.,-portion Servl~S
Tran'portatlon Admlnistnrtion
4126120055:50 PM
Gloria Herrera
Management/Butlget Analyst
Oat_
Approved By
Transportion Services
Trans.portation Operations
4/27/20057:38 AM
Approved By
Mornamt A. Bishop
Tranlipotfion Services
Projlt(:tM3l1;:1!,Ct
D;~te
Stormwater Management
~/27;200S 9:23 AM
Director
0...
Approved By
Ricardo Valera
Tmoapot1ion Services;
Storrnwnter M.,"ag~mant
'r27/2005 1 :2:1 PM
Dot.
Approved By
Eugene Calvert
Trllm.$portatiQn.$ Servicll!~;
Principal ProJect Manager
Transportation Engineering and
Cons.truction Manag/tment
4/27/2D05 2;54 PM
Right Of W~y ACllUi5itlon Mani~nl~r
Date
Approved By
Kevin H4!ndticks
Tmn5porlion Servlc.e!>
Tran!Oportation Engineering and
Construction
4f27l'2D05 4;3& PM
Executive See-notary
Date-
,-
Approved By
Pat Lehnhan:l
Trilnspartation Servic.es
Tf'UnsportOltioll StlJvj(~S Admin
4/28/20058:26 AM
Administrative Assistant
Date
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
CClllllty Mltl)ll!lt!r'!~ Ofl'ic:e
Office of M2Ino1lgenllmt,\ Budget
4!29/20051:4-8 AM
Senior Management/Budget Analyst
Oal.
Approved By
Susan Usher
County Manager's OffjCt~
ONice of Managemeni & Budget
4/29/20051:11 PM
Date
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
County Manager's Office
Management & Budget Director
Office 0' Management & Budget
S!3/2005 2:00 PM
Coul'lty Muna'ller
Date-
Approved By
James V. Mudd
8aQ,d uf County
CornmiSHicmets
COLlnty Manager's Office
5/3/20053:18 PM
Agenda Item No. 1686
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 10
Query Results: 1 Records
~11
· I"". ...-i"::-p;... F- ::
176401280100rHAM1L TON 11337
L_.___.__.t~:~~...__~_
8ackto Search Menu
i.StartllJ rill ~ e IJ ~Inb~x-..liiJMicroso...1 @)colJjer...II~ArclMS...'ij~.:.llJf'lyDoCuments >>I~~. 3:10PM
PROJECT NAME: Wiggins Pass Outfall
PARCEL NO(S): TPJ Parcel
FOLIO NO,: 75461280106
Agenda Item No. 16B6
May 10. 2005
Page 5 of 10
WARRANTY DEED
\ R-ll\ II' 1,
THIS WARRANTY DEED made this day of ~'--\0'f \ ~ , 2005. by
LORI HAMILTON, Successor Trustee of the TPJ, Inc. Irrevocable Trust dated March 9,
1988, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor") to COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the
State of Florida, its successors and assigns, whose post office address is 3301 Tamiami Trail
East, Naples, Florida, 34112 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee").
(Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this
instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns,)
WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars
($10.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged. hereby
grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee, all
that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, to wit:
The South 40 feet of Lot 9 and All of Lot 10, Block 4, Sunny Trail Heights, according to
the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 43, of the Public Records of Collier
County, Florida.
-,
Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record.
This is NOT the Homestead property of the Grantor.
TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto
belonging or in anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever.
AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized
of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and
convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the
same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all
encumbrances except as noted above.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the
day and year first above written,
(REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
WARRANTY DEED- TPJ, INC, IRREVOCABLE TRUST
Agenda Item No, 1686
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 10
WITNESSES:
(Signature)
oS>'\; ,V ','\v,.',-J\- "j' '---,-
.I
"-.-(
_. f...\ v. \
,. '
I.. _ '.
By: ,'\ ._.,..... ,..;.".
LORI HAMILTON, Individually and
as Successor Trustee
,...:..0:-:,
(Print Full Name)
r'- "
235 E, Ponce de Leon Avenue
Suite 170
Decatur. Georgia 30030
(Signature)
~':, J I .... :.
\.... 0',
(Print Full Name)
STATE OF FLORIDA ",,-.:,v
COUNTY OF COLLIER '-' ...-. I i-
}, .,.'--.....
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of \""- r, ,
20::.-. by LORI HAMILTON, Individually and as Successor Trustee of the TPJ, Inc.
Irrevocable Trust dated March 9, 1988, who:
'~,
is personally known to me
OR
has produced
as proof of identity,
(affix notarial seal)
(Signature of Notary Public)
.... ....-..."\'
~ -', "'-,\( J." "','
(Print Name of Notary Public)
NOTARY PUBLIC
Serial! Commission # (if any): " . \ '''''
My Commission Expires: \! ,.. I') "
Agenda Item No. 16B6
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 10
PROJECT: Wiggins Pass Outfall
PARCEL: TPJ Parcel
FOLIO #: 75461280106
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is
made and entered into this _ day of , 2005, by and between
LORI HAMILTON, Successor Trustee of the TPJ, Inc. Irrevocable Trust dated
March 9, 1988, whosemailingaddressis235E.PoncedeLeonAvenue.Suite 170,
Decatur, Georgia 30030 (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), and COLLIER COUNTY,
a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami
Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112 (hereinafter referred to as "Purchaser").
WHEREAS, Purchaser requires a fee estate in that land described as:
The South 40 feet of Lot 9 and All of Lot 10, Block 4, sunny Trail Heights,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 43, of the Public
Records of Collier County, Florida.
(hereinafter referred to as the "Property"), which is attached hereto and made a part of
this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Owner desires to convey the Property to Purchaser for the stated
purposes, on the terms and conditions set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, Purchaser has agreed to compensate Owner for conveyance of the
Property.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, the sum of Ten Dollars
($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby mutually acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties as
follows:
1. All of the above RECITALS are true and correct and are hereby expressly
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth fully below, and any/all Exhibits
referenced herein are made a part of this Agreement.
2. Owner shall convey the Property to Purchaser for the sum of $ 185,000,00
plus $1,525.00 for attorney's fees made payable to Hibbert and Hamilton,
subject to the apportionment and distribution of proceeds pursuant to
paragraph 8 of this Agreement (said transaction hereinafter referred to as the
"Closing"), Said payment to Owner, payable by County Warrant, shall be full
compensation for the Property conveyed, including all landscaping, trees,
shrubs, improvements, and fixtures located thereon, and for any damages
resulting to Owner's remaining lands, and for all other damages in connection
with conveyance of said Property to Purchaser, including all attorneys' fees,
expert witness fees and costs as provided for in Chapter 73, Florida Statutes.
3. Prior to Closing, Owner shall obtain from the holders of any liens, exceptions
and/or qualifications encumbering the Property, the execution of such
instruments which will remove or release such encumbrances from the
Property upon their recording in the public records of Collier County, Florida.
Owner shall provide such instruments, properly executed, to Purchaser on or
before the date of Closing.
4. Both Owner and Purchaser agree that time is of the essence in regard to the
closing, and that therefore Closing shall occur within sixty (60) days from the
date of execution of this Agreement by the Purchaser; provided, however, that
Purchaser shall have the unilateral right to extend the term of this Agreement
pending receipt of such instruments, properly executed, which either remove or
r
Purchase Agreement
Agenda Item No. 1686
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 10
Page 2
release any and all such liens, encumbrances or qualifications affecting
Purchaser's enjoyment of the Property, At Closing, Purchaser shall deliver the
County Warrant to Owner and Owner shall deliver the conveyance instrument
to Purchaser in a form acceptable to Purchaser.
5. Owner is aware and understands that the "offer" to purchase represented by
this Agreement is subject to acceptance and approval by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,
6. Owner represents that the Property and all uses of the Property have been and
presently are in compliance with all Federal, State and Local environmental
laws; that no hazardous substances have been generated, stored, treated or
transferred on the Property except as specifically disclosed to the Purchaser;
that the Owner has no knowledge of any spill or environmental law violation on
any property contiguous to or in the vicinity of the Property to be sold to the
Purchaser, that the Owner has not received notice and otherwise has no
knowledge of a) any spill on the Property, b) any existing or threatened
environmental lien against the Property or c) any lawsuit, proceeding or
investigation regarding the generation, storage, treatment, spill or transfer of
hazardous substances on the Property. This provision shall survive Closing
and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title.
7. Owner shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the Purchaser against
and from, and to reimburse the Purchaser with respect to, any and all
damages, claims, liabilities, laws, costs and expenses (including without
limitation reasonable paralegal and attomey fees and expenses whether in
court, out of court, in bankruptcy or administrative proceedings or on appeal),
penalties or fines incurred by or asserted against the Purchaser by reason or
arising out of the breach of Owner's representation under Section 6. This
provision shall survive Closing and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of
title,
8. Purchaser shall pay all fees to record any curative instruments required to clear
title, all Warranty Deed recording fees, and any and all costs and/or fees
associated with securing and recording a Release or Subordination of any
mortgage, lien or other encumbrance recorded against the Property; provided,
however, that any apportionment and distribution of the full compensation
amount in Paragraph 2 which may be required by any mortgagee, lien-holder
or other encumbrance-holder for the protection of its security interest or as
consideration for the execution of any release, subordination or satisfaction,
shall be the responsibility of the Owner, and shall be deducted on the Closing
Statement from the compensation payable to the Owner per Paragraph 2. In
accordance with the provisions of Section 201.01, Florida Statutes, concerning
payment of documentary stamp taxes by Purchaser, Owner shall further pay all
documentary stamp taxes required on the instrument(s) of transfer.
9. This Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof shall be effective as of
the date this Agreement is executed by both parties and shall inure to the
benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs,
executors, personal representatives, successors, successor trustees, and/or
assignees, whenever the context so requires or admits.
10, If the Owner holds the Property in the form of a partnership, limited partnership,
corporation, trust or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others,
Owner shall make a written public disclosure, according to Chapter 286, Florida
Statutes, under oath, of the name and address of every person having a
beneficial interest in the Property before the Property held in such capacity is
conveyed to Purchaser, its successors and assigns. (If the corporation is
registered with the Federal Securities Exchange Commission or registered
pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose stock is for sale to the
Purchase Agreement
Agenda Item No. 1686
May 10. 2005
Page 9 of 10
Page 3
general public, it is hereby exempt from the provisions of Chapter 286, Florida
Statutes,)
11. Conveyance of the Property by Owner is contingent upon no other provisions,
conditions, or premises other than those so stated herein; and this written
Agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire
Agreement and understanding of the parties, and there are no other prior or
contemporaneous written or oral agreements, undertakings, promises,
warranties, or covenants not contained herein,
12, This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Florida.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
this _ day of , 2005.
AS TO PURCHASER:
DATED:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
, Deputy Clerk
BY:
Fred W. Coyle, Chairman
AS TO OWNER:
DATED: oL\ - \ % - (b
Q'd~JDl)7Jc!
W' ess(Signature)
c1~
LE:.'~1f U/.JDUl.WoaO
Name (Print or Type)
LORI HAMIL ON, uccessor Trustee
of the TPJ, Inc. Irrevocable Trust dated
March 9, 1988
~B j/~~
Witness (Signature)
AA,'f/1 73. /tJ1'''/dr,d9e.
Name (Print or Type)
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Heidi F. Ashton
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No, 1686
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 10
PLEASE EXECUTE THIS AFFIDAVIT IN ITS ENTIRETY AND RETURN TO:
Midwest Title Guarantee Company of Florida, LLC
3936 Tamiami Trail North, Suite A
Naples, Florida 34103
(239)262-2163
$10.00 Record
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
'fr//'
, '
/, /1,'
--r
Jonathl'tn Hibbert, being first duly sworn deposes and says:
That I am an attorney practicing in Decatur, Georgia with the law firm of Hibbert and Hamilton.
That I have reviewed the original Trust ofTPJ, Inc, Irrevocable Trust dated March 9,1988 along
with amendments, if any.
That said aforesaid Trust provides for Lori Hamilton to act as Successor Trustee if Kenneth W.
Richman, Jr. or Robert Cimino cease to act as Trustees.
That said aforesaid Trust is in full force and effect and has not been revoked or amended since
Lori Hamilton became Successor Trustee,
That said Successor Trustee, has the full power and authority to sell and convey the real property
to Collier County described as follows:
The South 40 feet of Lot 9 and Lot 10, Block 4, Sunny Trail Heights, in accordance with and
subject to the plat recorded in Plat book 4, page 43, Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
Further Affiant sayeth not. .J j , /
/ '~I...r;~{/i-:.4,i;)?irr
J onathqn Hibbert
/ 3., ^.. ~k" ""' kJ H-'\~hc'.t
The fQrrgoing instrument was sworn to and subSCrib~d before me this ~ f'fS..- day of
f: PI' 1 \, ,1-,0,0), by Jonathon Hibbert, who irlSersonally knov.1Uo.me or has produced
:\.. / A as identification. r I ( ,r:
~~~, lei c<^J :r r ~,\ CA'~ :h--.~
N2!, ARr PUBL~<? (print naII]C ;.elow) .) ,I
,\ yI Ie rD , / ,-1-14 I'Y\/ , tr,Y)
(printed name)
Agenda Item No. 1687
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 25
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve a Developer Agreement between Del Mar Retail Center, LLC
and The Board of County Commissioners providing for construction of and
reimbursement for a portion of the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project (Project
No. 51101) in the amount of $146,855.
OBJECTIVE: Obtain Board of County Commissioners (BOARD) approval of a developer
agreement that will provide for construction of and reimbursement for a portion of the Lely Area
Stormwater Improvement Project (LASIP) within the Delmar Retail Shops Site Development
Plan (Wildwood PUD).
-
CONSIDERATIONS: The proposed Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project consists of
improvements to an existing drainage system for an II, IOO:!: acre East Naples area, which
formed the major portions of the former Water Management District No.6 area. The LASIP
area project is generally bounded on the north by Rattlesnake-Hammock Road, on the east by
c.R. 951, on the west by an existing FP&L easement located approximately a mile and a half
west and parallel to Airport-Pulling Road and along the south by wetlands associated with
Naples Bay and Rookery Bay. The project area currently has two (2) outfall systems consisting
of the Lely Main Canal and a system of farm ditches and dikes associated with portions of the
easterly half of the project, which drains the Lely Manor area. The project area is therefore
divided into two (2) basins. The westerly most basin is known as the Lely Canal Basin and the
easterly most basin is known as the Lely Manor Basin. Although the project has some water
management improvement, it generally suffers from the lack of a comprehensive outfall system
and design.
Land use within the Basin consists of a combination of modem developments that have
improved water management systems consistent with current design requirements and best
management practices as well as older existing neighborhoods that were developed before water
management systems were required. The latter areas provide little if any water quality
improvements for stormwater runoff.
The purpose of the project is to lower the flood elevations and to reduce the duration of peak
stages while providing as much water quality improvement and groundwater recharge as
possible. Careful design of the project has avoided wetland impacts where possible and
minimized unavoidable wetland impacts to the maximum extent practicable, while still meeting
the overall project purpose.
-
The project will undertake the following construction activities:
Widen and deepen existing canals.
· Construct new channels.
· Construct new control structures and culvert systems.
Improve several existing control structures.
Agenda Item No. 1687
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 25
· Install new flood control gates.
· Construct spreader lakes and berms at outfalls.
· Construct a pump station to rehydrate existing wetlands.
An Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) from the South Florida Water Management District
was issued on October 14, 2004. The Collier County Stormwater Department expects to receive
approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, for dredge and fill activities, within the next 6
months. Total estimated construction costs are approximately $45,000,000. Construction is
planned to commence in January 2006, with one phase to be completed each year for six or
seven years.
The developer of the Del Mar Retail Center is in the final approval phase of the project with
construction commencement scheduled for the end of May 2005. This developer agreement with
Del Mar Retail Center, LLC. provides for donation of the required easement and construction of
a small portion of LASIP this year. This portion includes installation of one thousand twenty
feet (1,020') of forty-two inch (42") concrete pipe located in a twenty-five foot (25') drainage
easement adjacent to the north side of the Davis Boulevard right-of-way east of the Santa
Barbara Blvd. Intersection. This portion of LASIP is currently scheduled for construction in
phase 6 or 7 however there is no engineering, planning or budgetary disadvantages in
constructing this segment today.
Installation shall be in accordance with the County's standard specifications for this type of work
(Exhibit "B" of the Agreement). Work on the Project is estimated to commence in May 2005
and be completed within 6 months. The Collier County Stormwater Management Department
will inspect the work during construction. The reimbursement payment will be contingent on
satisfaction of a final inspection by the Stormwater Department. The work will be covered by
the standard one-year warranty (Exhibit "C" of the agreement). This proposed installation is
reinforced concrete pipe with a minimum useable life of forty (40) years. The proposed
installation is approved by the Stormwater Management Department with details shown in the
Del Mar Retail Shops Site Development Plans (Exhibit "A" of the Agreement) in conformance
with the County and State approved LASIP design plans.
-
The cost of this construction is based on a signed copy of Jensen Underground Utilities, Inc.
proposal number 10193 dated 3/2/05 including a cost breakdown (part of Exhibit "A" of the
Agreement). Stormwater staff has reviewed the cost breakdown of the proposed work and
determined that the unit prices are well within the range of current prices received for other
similar projects. Cost savings recognized by Collier County in proceeding with completion of
the work per the subject agreement can be realized in several ways. First, by completing this
portion of LASIP concurrently with construction of the Del Mar Retail Shops, the required size
of the drainage easement necessary is reduced from 40 feet wide to 25 feet wide. Less land is
required when installing the LASIP pipes while the entire site is under construction. A 40-foot
wide easement would be necessary if the culverts had to be installed subsequent to the Del Mar
Shops construction due to access and staging requirements. A conservative estimate of savings
based on an easement size reduction of 15 feet in width times 510 feet in length or 7,650 square
feet (sq. ft.) at $10.00 per sq. ft. equals $76,500. Second, the cost of the pipe installation is
Agenda Item No. 1687
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 25
reduced when combined with the other underground utility and site work (Del Mar Retail Shops)
in the same proximity. Expenses for mobilization, staging area and transportation are reduced
when all work is combined and completed concurrently.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $146,855 are available in the Stormwater
Management CIP Fund (30 I) for this project (Project No. 5110 1). Source of funding is ad
valorem taxes.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: The Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project is
listed as CIE Project No. 291 and is in accordance with the intents of the Drainage Sub-element
of the Public Facilities Element of the Growth Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Developer Agreement between Del Mar Retail Center,
LLC. and the Board of County Commissioners for construction and reimbursement of a portion
of LA SIP and authorize the Chairman to sign for the Board.
PREPARED BY: Jerry Kurtz, P.E., Stormwater Management Department
Attachments: (I) Developer Agreement
(2) Del Mar Development Plans - Developer Agreement Exhibit "A"
(3) Pipe installation specifications - Developer Agreement Exhibit "B"
(4) Contractor's Warranty - Developer Agreement Exhibit "C"
(5) Contractor's Proposal with cost breakdown
(6) Project Location map
"..........'
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Approved By
Gerald Kurtz
Trilns~rtiQfI Stll'ViL-.eS.
Agenda Item No 1687
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 25
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1687
Recommendation to approve a Developer Agreement between Del Mar Retail Center. LLC
and The Board of County Commissioners providing for construction of and rein1bursement
tor a portion ofthe Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project (Project No 51101) in lhe
Clmount of $146,855,QO
5110/20059:0000 AM
56" ior EnginE'er
Date
Stonnwater Manageln6n1
4;26120055:43 PM
Director
Dal.
Approved By
Ricardo Valera
Trans.portioll Services
Stormwater Management
4!21/200S 1:42 PM
AGsistilnt County Attomey
Dine
Approved By
Jr.ff Klatzkclw
County Attorney
County AttDrney Office
"t21/200S 3:02 PM
Purcha,'SingIGeneral SlIC& Olrtlctor
Date
Approved By
Stevo Carnell
AdrninlstJ.ltiv(I S"rvic:et;
Put'chasing
.4!27{2005 5:10 PM
Nonn E. Feder I AICP
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
Approved By
Tr.:lnsportion Service;
Tr.ansport.lllon Servic.es Admin.
4/28/20057:35 AM
Approved By
Rhondl1l Rembm1
Administrative S(!orVlces
CQntr.lct Specialist
DO!Itl~
Purchasing
4/2&12005 &:37 A.M
Accounting Supervisor
Date
Approv.d By
Sharon Newman
Transportion Services
Transportation Administra.tion
4/28/20051C;35 AM
Pat Lehnhard
EXer.lJtlw! Soffcretmy
O.~te
Approved By
Transportation Services
TranJ;.portabon Services Admin
4'28/200512:13 PM
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Oat.
Approved By
Courlty M"IU~{!tlr's;. Offil:e
ortiCI! of Management &. Budget
4f281200S ":40 PM
Approved By
Susan Usher
County Mana9E!r's Office
Senior Management/Budget Analyst
Date
Office of Managl&fflent & Budget
4!Z9/Z00S 1:34 PM
Mnn.lgmnuot &. Budget Dirflctor
Dale
Approved By
Michmtl SlJlykowski
County Manaqer's Office
Office of Ma.nagement & Budget
5i2f2005 12:11 PM
County Manager
Oatf!
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board uf County
ComlTli~u;iDnIH!f,
County Man.:&ger's Office
Sf4J2005 8:.&9 AM
Agenda Item No, 1687
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 25
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this _ day of
, 2005, by and between Del Mar Retail Center, LLC, whose address is 4722
Navassa Lane, Naples, Florida, 34105, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and The Board of
County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the governing body of Collier County,
hereinafter referred to as "County."
R E C I TAL S:
WHEREAS, Developer has legal control over or is the owner of approximately 3 acres of
property in unincorporated Collier County, Florida, which is the site of a Site Development Plan
known as Del Mar Retail Shops, located in a the Wildwood Estates PUD approved by the
County by Ordinance No. 1981-27; and
WHEREAS, while developing the Del Mar Retail Shops, Developer is willing to build a
small portion of the County's proposed regional drainage system improvement known as the
Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project ("LASIP") ahead of the County's schedule, thereby
eliminating the need for the County to later disturb the property; and
WHEREAS, the County is willing to compensate Developer for its costs incurred In
building the drainage system improvement costs as set forth below; and
WHEREAS, after reasoned consideration by the Board of Commissioners, the Board
finds that work described herein is in conformity with the contemplated improvements and
additions to the County's storm water management system and is consistent with both the public
interest and with the County's existing comprehensive plan.
WIT N E SSE T H:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and
valuable consideration exchanged amongst the parties, and in consideration of the covenants
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
I. All of the above RECITALS are true and correct and are hereby expressly
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth fully below.
2. As set forth in detail in Exhibit "A", Developer shall install approximately one
thousand and twenty feet (1,020') of forty two inch (42") concrete pipes to be located in a twenty
five foot (25') drainage easement adjacent to the north side of the Davis Blvd. right-of-way east
of the Santa Barbara Blvd. Intersection (the "Project"). The installation shall be in accordance
with the County's standard specifications for this type of work, which specifications are attached
to this Agreement as Exhibit "B." Work on the Project is estimated to commence
, 2005. Should this work not commence within six (6) months from this
estimated date, County shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon written notice to
Developer.
Agenda Item No. 16B7
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 25
3. Developer will administrate, in the form of plans, memoranda and reports, any
necessary Project changes. Should any such changes occur, Developer shall notify the County's
representative, and if the County approves such changes in writing, Developer will prepare a
Change Order and/or Supplemental Agreement as appropriate.
4. In consideration for the work contemplated herein, County will pay Developer the
sum of One Hundred Forty Six Thousand, Eight Hundred and Fifty Five Dollars ($146,855).
County shall have the right to inspect the Project and shall have access to the site at all times
during construction of the Project. Payment shall be promptly made following final inspection
and approval of the Project by County. Developer will obtain required waivers and releases of
claim of lien from persons and firms performing work or providing services on or for the Project.
County's sole obligation to Developer under this Agreement shall be this payment. Concurrent
with the receipt of payment, County will be provided with a one-year warranty for the work
done, in a form substantially in compliance with Exhibit "c." Developer confirms that County
has the right to enter the easement area to unplug the ends of both pipes at the appropriate time
following completion of the downstream components of the LASIP system.
5. To the extent permitted by Florida law, Developer shall defend, indemnify and
save the County harmless from any and all claims, liability, losses and causes of actions arising
out of any act, error, omission, negligence of the Developer or its agents or representatives
arising from or incident to Developer's performance under this Agreement. Developer shall not
be responsible for any incident arising from the sole negligence of the County. This provision
shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by any employee of the Developer,
any contractor, sub-contractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them.
Developer shall maintain insurance in the minimum amounts and types as required by Florida
Law.
6. The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this
Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the parties to this Agreement. Except as
otherwise provided herein, this Agreement shall only be amended or cancelled by mutual written
consent of the parties hereto or by their successors in interest. This Agreement is solely between
the County and the Developer; no Third Party Beneficiary or other ancillary rights are intended
to be created herein.
7. This Agreement shall not be construed or characterized as a development
agreement under the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act. In the event state
or federal laws are enacted after the execution of this Agreement, which are applicable to and
preclude in whole or in part the parties' compliance with the terms of this Agreement, then in
such event this Agreement shall be modified or revoked as is necessary to comply with such
laws, in a manner which best reflects the intent of this Agreement.
8. Developer acknowledges that the failure of this Agreement to address any permit,
condition, term or restriction shall not relieve either the applicant or owner, or their successors or
assigns, of the necessity of complying with any law, ordinance, rule or regulation governing said
permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions.
2
Agenda Item No. 1687
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 25
9. This Agreement may be recorded by the County at its cost in the Official Records
of Collier County, Florida. A copy of the recorded document will be provided to Developer
upon request.
10. In the event of a dispute under this Agreement, the parties shall first use the
County's then-current Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure. Following the conclusion of
this procedure, either party may file an action for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court of Collier
County to enforce the terms of this Agreement, said remedy being cumulative with any and all
other remedies available to the parties for the enforcement of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
by their appropriate officials, as of the date first above written.
Attest:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
By:
, Deputy Clerk
By:
Fred W. Coyle, Chairman
WITNESSES:
DEL MAR RETAIL CENTER, LLC, a Florida
limited liability company
By:
Print Name:
Name:
Title:
Print Name:
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged
, 2005, by
Mar Retail Center, LLC, He is [ ] personally known to me, or [
no. as identification.
before me this_day of
, as of Del
] has produced driver's license
(SEAL)
NOTARY PUBLIC
Name:
(Type or Print)
My Commission Expires:
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow
Assistant County Attorney
3
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PROJECT No. 5110 12
LEL Y AREA STORMW A TER IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
:lEi
}IS ExCHANGEAVE
GA/LBLVD
2A
PROPOSED BY: COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVICES
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
HORSESHOE SQUARE, SUITE No. 214,2685 SOUTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 732-2501
PROJECT MANAGER: GERALD N. KURTZ
DATE: AUGUST,2004
I.. .
IQ
10::
1Ci)
Iu..
Iu..
I::;)
IClJ
~
. I
,\ I
-'.:-~_.-- --- ---r-
1
1
I
1
,
: 1>
I
1
,
I
I
-r
I
I
I
I
I
: 13
I
I
1
1
1_-
- ._-'-'--~
I
I
23
SABAL PALM RD
I
-----------1---
I
I..,
I'
I
I
35 : 36
I
I
I
I
.
o
I
0.5
Miles
~
-.l
>-
~
Ii'
00
z
<
~
~
~
z
~ ~
~~~
~o~
o~~
~ ~
~ <
> ::E
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
......
00
r./J
~
o
=0
r./J
@
~
tIl
t.il
E--
~
tIl
t.il
o
o
o
~
o
...::l
-
~
'--'
~
I-1l
\C
N
.,
OIl
~
~
o
8 ~.g
g V'\ .t::
\C 0.. ~
8 :.at...
~ ~i
Zo ,.....~8
~ ....
,g s 13
~ 'J;; 0
gU
lZl
"""'
o
~
~
.5
."
II)
t;i
<.)
o
...J
Agenda Item No. 1687
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 25
,l~".S'
(;''#~~'l\\
~.,( i IIll! =
\...,~...~ '1/
~:: .. 'fI":",#G
~11l"\ll~
~ .. ~ ~lllli\!lii,",ll!Ii!~l!s 1.1
.. lll,. ~ 3 ,.-~ ori ~~!I'" Il
. ~ ~ fi <lit Wi CI) . to: ~ t. I
~~ ~~i III !tl!s i~~!ti?Sd~ ~ l!s~
" !1'" l!s.. l!"'''' ,F....~il. lll", Iil'l!l
\!l i-:>~~.. ~f;;~ ~e~ ~ jl;..~bjO/2 ~I
~i~!~"~ ~~~ /2~~ ~ ~jO*~;~ ~~ ~
\!l.t.~~~ ..Ri m~'" i~~ ~i /2t ~
~~ell!s~I~~!~~~;~ ~~~~F~ ~~il!s
~Iil~!i~~~~~;..~~~i ~~~~!~ ~~~~
~~ wi~ ~~~~W"iAI~~ ~~~~~8 l!s.~
~~ F~~~~Iil~~ ,,! i~ Fe~~~6 ~~~~
~ l!sigi~t c~l!s~Q, :It! i;)it";I'!'fD.lIl"'''
~;a~~li:~i~:im~~!!~;i~li!il
~-~
~
Ii!:
~B
~~
~ O\t!
... v - t'--
.. i!l fa :; elf
...Cil...J""'....
CSp:al~;q
] ~ ~.t:: ~
ca~~:=a
~...JZ~ 1:!
~-g~]~
~ r-- Ii']'
:s'<tZ~
~
1~
.';,~
~
i i~
, ; !
~
,.,
0..
~
oj
d
..J
2z
III '" <
Z <c:
-I-
< c1~
~ ~~
t:l.. ~~(5l;iti
lI.I z s:U~LLltU
o ~ "'z~iJ'jiJ'j
.... iii fljQi!5::l::l
.... iii >"'l"<<
~ ~ 8~~~~
~
-
~
to- -<"'I~,""V)
W
W
'"
'"
I
f
~li!!~
...J"';l."
~~$!;
~h
"i,!
'l) .II'
'0 Ii'~
I.I..~~~
<iJ~
.!:;_!l'l
~i5-~
t:!:i -
~
~
I
t:l..
<
jf
~
'Ii
=
~
~ Ii
if
ji
..!
cd
-,
3:1
~ i !
,,~ z
i
1
'"
..,
it:1
r~ ""
~q ~
f ,~ ;~ ~~
. ~~ ~ ~
~" j> ~
.. ~ ~: ~
'i ~
~ t: m wi ~'~
'"
~ 1
~ , ~~. ~.
~,: -i
,.
ti:
~
~
..!
~,
',I. 01
:;':' ~i
~H
,;.:t;~~.
~lt~ if
\~~1;1
...,.i;'I.;.lo
;.;
~
g
5
u
"
~
':.!J
9.~
~c
- ;;
.. -
'..; 0 g
!:G .:::
~ ~'~
E:~~
~Cl:5
."
"
~
~
--...../~
..r-.v--.....-'''_,\_
(~fc ~~..
~ I i o~
~ (Di' ~':~~:
\ .1 ~:,
~ .:),
( .,' c>:iil
~ h ~~
r g:
I
'.... .../'>._.......--./'...._....,..-.^.,..~_/
\
!
)
,
\
<
I
')
"
\
<.
u '
,...l ~
,...l~J
U.r~~~
c.; ~ {~
.. !l-"'"
>v~ ~E
~ o'~.~
o ..~;.
~ ~ ~~
~U~
";1; fJ
~ "I
Q
1'1'1 ~;i~ :i~ ~~ i? ~ ii~
~<:;,l~ or!!":;:~ :fi " ~i
II ~~~~ ~~~ ~.',~ ~i r.! ,~
l! '.~~, ~"~ ~~_ .", :9
! I;.....: :',' i..: i..'! l..' I,;I,;! Iii II !! 11
::~ I! ': ~".
;:;
'~
:i
~~
~;
~i
~
&:-1
ox,
~
~~~
~,
p, ~!
~
ffi
J:I jl ~i
. ;:;
i
i
r 0 I ~: a ~ ~ till a
il ii i il .! ~ !Bi ~ i II ' !
II~III~~ .~. jll~ ! III I ; I~nd
2 . d l! : i~~ I I !llIn
!.I!.I; Il h lij J IiI a ~ ~"lij I
I;; 1;11 U ~! IPi .1 I'~~!; II~ J ~
I Ii "I t~". iI f ~il il' .11" ~ a
;!I~! ai gr I' Ii i~ I~ I f ~IIIPi
:!~ =~~ ~j ~I~: ~~ ~I :19 ~; :! :. ~il! ~; !~ ;1. ~t ~I
II: !I i;~ 11 .11;1 Ii ! I I r r< ~ if II I ~., I~'II i. ! ~ .~~j i
~~! ;i i~; ~ I"!: il! I~~ ~I:I i i;1 I il;1 r!Cf IIi ~ Iii ~!~t ;i I !I i '!i
N id ~!~ i 1m i~~ 11"1 : te' si II: r i~!i~ I h ~ ~b~ li1il ~ · n I)
ili! illll!! : iJ! J.t II ~l!! Ii Il~i: iii. ,~lli I e.l !li .!I!a II I, i:1 I.
I ill! !l! Ii!! ~ I ~I!nl'!! ~II ~il~!!l!ilml!ill I~~!llhh liL I~ 111I!i ~ ~l!1 ~
__ _bb "~r. 1".8'" 5..i .II"".'"'' ~"".. '""~". trhd' a rd Ir r~d ~II S ~.e w,... ""'.. -.J ·
.cEi '" ~ hi .,@it OIIe !!al~ :!I !:!~ ~IE Ofl"',#~"': ./
2Z _ +
~
;0 ~~ ~
~ r::
~~ j i
~o % ~ t
.~ ~. ~
7~ ~~ :
~~ ti~ ~
"9 ~~ ~
~~ ~
~~ ~~ !
e:! ~it ~
~l! ~~ ~
"6 "~ l
~. ~" ~
~ Qj u
Jc ~
~ ;!;
. ~
<0
~
'"
~ ~~ 6
l'j ~,..-4
':!' ~d:!'
~ ~~~~
I ~M
~ ~lU
~ ~~~~
~ i~~~
~ :;~3
~ I~~""'I.I.
...... ~ bf
9 ~;
I Uhi
l hl;'Cl~
~m
.
. ~
. ~
~
,~t ~
:~ I
~. t)
~~ >
~
8
<is
~
. ~
. .
~ ~
/ I
..
">"'"
f~
""'t>.o
~~
~ ~ 6
<of ~ u
J E ~
!~~
I
~
!
~fi
U t
~!I! ~ ...J II
-Yo!.-.__ . t ~hl
;>:j~
{j ~Hi
V ~,IG&;;
-----. -( E,H
!; ~ ..1-< 'l' ~~
-. -ell r ~ I
I;
I
Ii
~
__ t :~ i
I d
I . ;:
I; U
I 1~ u!
I. II
.~ 3 ::t
~; ~ u
I: ~ !
I~ ~~! i~!
! 1 f 1 r ;I~ ~ i
. --- ...... ! I I ::
_T' -lUlI_
I~""
I
I
\
~.,.I
ml
I Iii
I @ m
I i Ii
1m I II
g~hli
jg. I; ,~
G Ila ~(!i .
i. ~
t
,..
I. !:I
"'llnll fl.
I'.. ':.. I'
.,~ II"." I
.11' II I
111= hi I"
Q
I
II
II
I t
<((j
I
ft
\
! i
~(i
II
~ .1
.,
. I' >
I;; I ~
I J
IS 'I S
'I I'
j~. . I
~ ~ I
. !i I
'. 'I
!I .
,- .
i
'.
If
..
II
//
!I', (',/. I
II" i I ~,.
It'fll! ! 1_
I~II !I II . ! ·
I,! .1 .:. .:r.;- a-
IIII i~':':f' "
~.if 101 I,
mil m
~ ',t
, .,
., l: '!
If. I :1.
i!P;1i9!
.....1';;10
IriPfi!ln
!! q il!; il ii
.' I. P h: d
ad ~! ! ~ ~ ~b !!
71
~"I
-I
61 ~
, Agenda Item No. 16
it :{*I Hill, I pi 11 May 10, 2005
H h~; I!li;: f Iii n ! Page 12 of 25
il till ;'I~{; ; 'lilt :1 :
If Ih' 'lld 'II II I
~It WI! It} ii ! ; !:I ii ! . ~
~ .11 ',.ll dl'if' ,:t I'h ,II ·
~ 1'1 '.11" .tI!', , It, U ,1 I. J
.Ir '/ 'II' I" I lit I' I
II~ li!h hlhl; II, ji:', liP
ltl i,l'! Pi I'" I :;. II :' f
II! Idl! ,1ilU. .! 141 h Ii I
..." '" ,,<II '01 ... ot. ..
Ilroi
g.,. g t If
. ~ f ~~IiHj II
.. . ~~J ";,,. ~
.1 ~.l:~_~_'" .; ~
r.....'a....~7--.
· '!
, ~~~~.:
t~~ 1'-' ;~JU
~ ~'-~I ).,
'"..1~~":~i_./ ..'
., -
W. .
~ --,
I)
/
:6-<1 ' ~
- ",i
/~I;)
~.
i
-'k
illl!
lill!
111'1 I
1,,&1, lilf
all ..I
^, W
; "'"
,I
U
~""
II
'I
,.
,
h
"1
,Ii
..,.'.
Iih~1
Ii ;. '
JIll ;S
!i: h ·
III..
~1 -
I .
I f-.
il ~
/" Ii
I "
~~-
~ S
~~~'" ;;. 2
II .' u ,
,,--JY
,
~ ' ' .'
!I ~~.f- I i
II" ~ I ~
!I~; ~ r.h I
I!tl i
Iii!'
I!
::!
;I.,
~
'.slll iJf
~ !l' I q~lr- i
I ~ Illli.l~ l
: 1"llIl' i;'~II;I;!I'
iI" IIIl . t ,I I
~ ; I~ pi'ill'lell.!~!!i
" !I liaeelIIQI~~lglll
ILl ~.;n" ~ ,~~I~l'!lf
I, ") ,-
,,' . I'
Ii' .' I
~l' !l1.JLlli1 !I
IJ'~~ I
:.i!
;;:>
'"I
I $
I i
L
,
f" i~
~ ~
J ~
t ! ~
. ~ ~
CJ
~
{I ifftt :
~: V\
~
~iiii ii
~~~l
Ii
. '" II'.
...r; . .
~ ~I"'hll
~:.=:I tfiU&li
,., I .
M
r--.-
~ig -''''
:l/r
,-~
~!,
.
i:
1:1
i Hi
II~
I
llm
il
.c
'"
~
~
"'~
1]
"'~
. ~~
~ ~ g
!f ...U
~ ].~
~~8
1
:!l
ii
fi
~
~ - ,
.....J !5
ijll.b
r;Q~S~1
~Ui
>-~ i~
~gi:"~
& ::;o~
. .~ i~
<~!i
~ =~u
'Cd o-~
- '"
~ ~
~1
I!
!i
:.
I
Hi
i
H
I~ 0
~ ~ !
Iii ·
ill
. ..
U"
n
n
~ ~ .
~ '
..!. .. ..i ~ f'
~I ~I ~ I
II L
,..........-~~~.-~--. -.,,-.,~~ ~..._,____~_.._,.",...,,,_.,,_v_,_.__ '~'^"'_"'_~'__'~"___'.'_""""" ....-.-_.^_,_u".^~,..~_-~.^.,'_.,.._,_.^'...,~h....-.........'~ ,......__'.N_~'~~'h"-,_:_.~~'~N'_'~___V.._.._~...V.".~.._.,.,.~...."'~_
i
,.
I
~
..~ I fi
.~
~ "
..,
~
~---
.
'11"
pu (
I~'IJ I'
~I' l!
Ind ~
'nll II:
I Ii a= ~
I'"
~!
~ ~0,
I 1I
\~;?;/
i1r I" I
:!I ~ 1 111
I::, I~
.q . [
i~! ~II j .ill
~ ,!
f I
." ;)) 2 II
~~- ~/J .
flJ !-J, I I
ll! ! ~ I I 11
III i! 1Ul I lhtJ1
illi I ~a~ll
II ~I
~a I ~I
~ I
~ ~ i
I I
I
/ \
I ~jl
/ 1/ . Idil'
/ ,/ ;, !i'~ P':
/ fj; ~ ~~- ,I tiS
I " /~./\ r ~
{W/ I /
\Z{~3.'rr: ~. /' n( .
'<:; Y !I ,/
/~l' I! I
I ~~ I; I
I ;11
May 10, 2025
p'age 13 o1!f5
I ~ I ~ e
I " . I
'2 i. 611111
I. ~.. . .
d lill ! ~ I I I
h .I:ji; I.:
r. I c: I I,ell
,lllll"il ;S!tl
lal I ;.'.1
I I: I! !It' IUI j
i i~.~I~F.~1 :I~;~ >
~5
~
I-if
tJi
>i
.~ ~
- ~
I ~ l~
~! f- ~!
~m"-1[,y "
q~~!
'--:.-------< I
I ·
~.; H
, . ,-
t~'l
I l,",~: Il~
, I ... If
.-. '" "",
. , 'hI'
{ --'--- ;ll ~
.:5.>--;.---1 lIt ~
M !~~!
l! J ~ '. <i It ;1:
~... .r n::to j
~;- ~H",
tL~ llU
':-,-IIl.;
,: !l'
i~i IJrJt~
~. ~-, i
I ~! '--- .-
I:, I " , __...:: _];"
..
"" .
, ' , ii:1 ~, .
,.,"':r'1.." i- , JIT'
.q;z;m - -- -
~ 1- ~, ~ / Q
I a( ~H
. . tl i -- -.-
1.,.I!1 ~ Iii'
til ~ · \ .11 A ill
I~'i \ :;;~ I!l
~II~~: r
So '--"
/
(
I
"
.1
II
! I 1P' ~
il! dd M
~.~! ill ~~,j
.l.. .
I!I!
I .g;~g
II;m
\
~,
-,
~
.1 !I
It "'
" 's
!~!ijl
!. .1 .
. II
iiI ~ ::
:1 i;
. ,I(
i:. (I 11 I
1-1 irlll ," ,,- s" '"~
I '\) I~,f ~II- ; : i' I~'I i'
: ; ~, r~!il dl~n :I . _
. k : I II_I 1:2: I I
i I III Idl! id!, i ! i It;
'J' lid. IlIff - I .-, I
- II 'l~tll!II~; e !I -
, I I 1..11 i.I.II I .11
,. · -"", i!hi ~ II .1
I,ll, !.II I. ~
'. iI"11i e. · II'
: V il!da: h~, ~I !1!i!Uuehl
ii
;!I
;:.
."&
.1;
~i
I;::J
l r ~r. I
[I 1 u
i r" r-I~
ijl ~
"il
h.
"'I
.]"
~
r.....'v- .~
i
I j'
. ,5
i~1
nl
m~
j
VI
::l
II
o
..
g.~
.c -
",,,,-,
=;;.
. :I c
j ~ is
!f "U
.3 e t
0... ___
~~8
J
~
!
~l
U j'
.-L _
.....:l ~!;]
:' ~~~
~8li~
~U~
~~~
:>-'1 ~~
~ uw~
i_' "Oe I<~
~ il~~
. ~gi>.
<t: .5'~
.;: ~ ~~
,!g'-'iij
il
~
~
II
tO~
~~
s-i
.
..
, ii
~!
'I
~i
ill
"
I~
1 I
.
.
, .
. . . . -i'
~I ~I ~ I
I I I ;
L~___..._--'"
.. _,_..~.,...,.m__,.....m._...""__"~__' ,..... .. .-."....,..... . _..- -".-..- . -.,
....,
:RprD5 ZOOS 11::27fm :t\,ef, p..", 11.0
2asi-zsj'-0472' A d INP~2.
. gen a tern O. 1687
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 25 ".
.~=-. ~z"lao ......~..~. _. .
.~.i;-..'". ..~~
,
,,1 "'" J ,......~
:. .01 scon OF 1f01Ut: Tt.ie- wo.rk spec.i.t.1ed a th1a ..eU06 COClU.6t.s of ail
mate:z:t..al-s. ana. ').&):)or pAbe:lJlfarytQoonllJt.%'ue'e amt. place twt;.o:
operation a .'t:ottm "'.'t.er man.agement. .yst..U'\Q.1.~:lng,: w:.....d
.w.l...., ret:.-ea't&.on "01': _'t,en1;1QD ba81a8, at-one beds'". ext1.1.trati:on;
t.~.1i=hes", pip....f' euJ.v.rt... ~.t.<1' manb.()).",~ .and .1.~ otha~
r41at-.dwcrk _.. lUiiiY .be nitQe...:30,tocorqplete the worka:1I 1lhcBm. -em.
the Pl.e.nst\nd as d.iract:edby i::h..EJt9ineer..
.. O~ .APJ?LJ:CABLE CaDZS.. S'aUfl'.).Ati.O$ AND SI?E-CI!''IC.A1!IOW-S: 'the worKunde.r
'i:hitlccm:tracrt .-hall. be in 'a't%':iet ;accordance wlth .t;he ~Q11.ow1no
Ciodeli and t>t.'andarde: 1 .
A. Local ,e~n'ty' ,and ~ntcipal 'Codes..
~ .
a" -..:.1,canSoc.i.a.'tyo:for 'lJ.'eG.inq ..l!U'.\d.II&teJi:u'l, .fM'!'M) ~
c. Ame~~q~ CQnc..t. ~Aat~eu~. (AC.). '
D.. ,1Im&rican 3:ronal'1d Bt.el Ilu,'t;:i;tutetllZSI1.
~.
~. !"3.orida Depa~ o~ t:rarutport$t:i.<m ~c.ff.1catlon:5 ('Elm,..
? Al~ l.oc.al,govern1-ngrul.. and .regulations-
.. :a -noouc-
...01 Moa'tAEU Mol:t,.r u.aed for (:on.~uct~Qn - aDd pla8terinq manhOle,s"
-j'unetionbOx..., d.%:'op i.nlet. and. junotionbOx8.$h-.11 De 1n
aQOOraal'lC8 wf1::h A.S1'K$peet.fi.C:Il'd.on.lI Se.i.allJ..i.grultion 0.-274.1... Tn.
Contractor will, h" ~e q)pf;~on cf, using .ither a Po:r:'bla,nci
eemsnt/hydrated lime mixtu:X'G 0'1" a portland ctament rd..Ktuz. wi ~
mason::y '. ~nt .addadf,or :.UAp.rcved :wor'betbil.l ty: however, tha '!19m.
mater.lal.s auat be ua.4t.hX-OU9aou.ttM,projee:t.. The-morta:
matez:i.a:ts sball. ,M~!!'t;t()!'1.d byvolU1!ll\11t....d 4JbaJ.J. .Po as
foll.dwSl
A. O~~ {ll pa;"t.Typ- i !1'O'rt1.ats.d cement - AS'!It' Cn.SO
r
B. '.1:1\%:'.& {3} ptlJr'b8 NJ-qr.gat& (sanO) .. AftM C1...
C. '!'he adcii.tio110~ l'NIL.ons;y 'eeDlnt (ASTMCi1.) .il.1 ae pe!lm!i.1tt.6d
-to improve W().rk:6b:il~t:y of moz:~.,
oii20...1
1;
23S-2G3-U472p.a
Agenda Item No. 1687
.~.I' 0.2 i"U1.N CO)t~ P.I.PSt Pl.a..j.p OQm:ue-.t.e pipe ahaJ.1. ~f.o~tl\- t.otWvlay 10 2005
requlrfl111auts of ASn4 Standard Speoj.t'1.cat1.ons tor Concret:. !'iici~e 15 of 25
o..i9JLiltionO;"14, ~.te$t rarl.af01'1r forsblndaa:-d 8't:rengthtlon-
reinfOJ;'c.ed conc;rete .p;3.pe..
"fjpr nil 20u$ jl$27Rjoj
tU!lt, lOt", i 10
.'.,
if
^ !
2~03 gIt.'If!"ORCED CONCRETE PIPE GJmE!GL: aa.infQrced concreta pipe
ma.teri.ll'lsh<<11 confo!:'m to S.c:t::1.0ft. 94.1 of the St.at. o:trlorida
St&nd.ar;c:l Speeificat1on. foX! aoa.c:t. .net Sri.(.\g. C~struetion, 198:6,
or latest x6vi~ion..
,2 . 04 .u~Ul!'OllaED ~ gIl'SliOONtJt. Re1.n'foraed concrete pipe shall.
..~ "th& ~eqcd~~ 01 AS.lJ'MS'tlancl:ardSpe~ifi0'a1:ri.tma.f-cr
Reinfo.n'HJ~'Con:~'t. .cylv.:-'tI.l;QDl ~ii1n amlS4W4l~ P1p.1f, .Mnt
C111, lacest: revision,. class III wall. type B.
2...0SJt>nrrs . FOR. ~SPI:P.BAamn.f ~O'.in:t.$ ."If>-~ ~d .re1n,for:ce:d
concret.pipe 1)ha.1J.be Made 1>1 U$~ o!! nO-IU.ngW round. synthet;..ie
rubberqaskets wh!.chconfoD1\.. t:o$eeti.ons ~iL;o- 'and 942-1 ~f t.h'lt
seate Qf I'lcrida Standard Spe.a:f!:lca:t::i.cn$ for aoad :andSridq.8
COu.tr:u.ctiDn,,1.986, Or14t~t rey.ia.um...
Z ..U6i.BlKi"Of!.0S"0 ~lWgp rpS:ELLrPTl"CA~\ JUl.ipt.,1CJ.ll concret..pipe
sball. ccm:fCi'rIll ".ita ~he requ:ir.ni'ant.a ot' MTIi 0507(' ex.oept b.hit:t tihe
.xaept.1.on.. ilnd mosi1f.1CiitJ.onii to ~STN C7'~ .. .peC'1~.i.d in 94:1-
1.3 ..ottbe State of. ,Elo.ri4.a st4nd<4rd Spec:ificet!.Qn$fori\o.<a .n'd
Br1dgeConsuuct1c..ry.i:1S\S.~...s.b.al1.apply .&.l:&0 toelJ.ip~,is::,j!,J. p1pe,.
whersapplicable<< S1:anqard-el1iptica1 p.lpe ~h.U1. meet the
r.qu!rement5 of Tabl. I for CLa.. HE-III and .p.e~al eL~~ptie~l
pi.pe. sha1.1 meet. the :r....qui.reD'lilUl.t.. <:If Table t for Cl&ssHE-rV'..
1.1 ~1:1;.ftl1 ftOl,e. w:n ~ noe be pertlli tt.d in p~pe. ~.. .
;.
.2. 0" U~ eo~'l"E PIPE (Ueti P1Pll): Arch c.or:c.rft. pi-pee is'ha'1..1
eodQzm. \fit.h. t.he !:equtrlMMnt.s of.U"2'K a&O' .~eep't t.b.e.t the
exoeptionaand mod1.fiaati-one "t,D AS1'H 'C76 CUi .sp.Cfi,;~$I,lCl, a .9410-1..3..
o~ i:h&Staeeof F1oridaei:.t:t$I:'(l 9pecification1r Road an-claridge
COn$f;rt"zctionr 19t6,8ha.ll .app'.ly wherea.ppU.oaole to Arch p!pe.
~~~inq ho~e~ wi~1.not ~~ per.m1tt~d ~~ ~1pe.
2.0S JO:tmf:S ~ ltLLfH1CAL ANt) MCH C~ PI?:!: ~:L..1d joi:nt/!ffor
eliipei6.~ and arch con~et8 sBa11 he~de with 4 pre-fo~d
~lasti:e -g'aa1Cet ntateri.al. Tl\e g.l.lIk.t j\"i'i'-ti;t.iiSl j'hsl!. oon:fo:rm to
ket.lon 9'~-1 .o.r tAeSt.ate 0.1 !".1.cr:.ida.$tAndar=1 S>>eeificatio~ fo..r
~ .al'd\3r1~C.:Omlt~uet.i~1' 19$;~, O~ l~te.t. ::evi.t,on.. "1'he'
1U:~.\iU~~a.1 abaJ.J. -b. "'Er..iu!i-NeJttl a..a 1DAI.\u:t.c~u.red byK.rr:.... .sn:yde~ Co"..
or an appcrovad: equal.
2.~'CORRt1GAT2f) M..!JMINmt. :ALLOY CtiLV&~: Aluminumal.l.oyeul vert pj,pe
sh.&.,l1:meetthlerequ,i.re.mentsc:fSect:1on $C.~ oftb. state-. of
o.21:l0-2
L
H~r 115 2005 j i : Z7fm b;&f it-1!' d j.o
2:aB-2tJa-n47Z .p.4
Agenda Item No. 1687
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 25
.t'lp~:idb. St.andard spaci:ficA'tions for Road And Bzid/'l_ COl'UJt.n:1ctiosh
1916l"o%'1a~_t ~T1.1on.1Ihez.e1:d..~.ooae.ad. .a.lUddnum .p1pe
i:o~o.li!i.*d,tl\e.b.i:t:.'t.U!ltftou. coati.ng. _hall. me.t. 'the- requ.iz:em.nt..s
of AAS-no m901' for ~Y'P. A" U'ulJ.y Si t:umi.n.oue Coat.ed).
2 .11) eo...~UGAT2D ME&L . PI..PS M'D PIe. AaClhCO-~;:~94tM at....1. ~lpe.,
i:nciucttft9' rcy.mdcu.1.,.en p1P.rP1pr.11 ar.ohan4un4.Z'drainr and
CO',.l1z.9 blmda .f~ ..en tl'P-i ~11~Q~to the.. requ1.~nt!f,
of 8ect.i.o;n -943ioz t.h$ stat. ot Fl.orida S'tancmrd Spaci:f1ca:t.1.ona
:fQ:r ao.. &:lMii .l!iJ::,i.d.g_ (;Ol'Ul'truot:.ion"l.SBfi, c-.r J..&t..t:cevi4i.on.
cor:rugated. 1:I"C...lpi:peahaJ..l beJd t;wminoulf CCi,l1a:-tft" .bot;h.~ft.,. in
iic::~.::(n:chmee1d 'th tm!i re1:{'<lirement.a of AASHTOH1JJZ, 'l"ypaA (i'u~ly
Si tum1notttt Coated)..
2.11COllRtf6ATB%)POL~BYLJ:.1(E PIPE: Cc~gat~ Roi.y.1:.byi..ene .ra:1pta :and
t.i t.tu"Qe .ball 3Metthe -requirement. QX AS'TJj.1'4tt5 $Lnd ri67.,.&nd
sha1.1 be as tIiIltufaatunJd by ~. .oi:'a1aa\Yfi,Sye-t-..%nc.
.~1\O'S i# LU:Sotl Dl.~a:i\t4geSY$tSlmilor a:Pp.rav.adaq"1iJ.a1... SZccth ;i.-nner
~.&l.l. cc::.ruptu ~pelye1:.hy..lene p.lpe s'ba1..l he' ADS .12 It DS. supe:!.'
ee<!:l:'; or approved ~l.. r.:o.r~'ted p-oJ.yethy1ane p1.pe.!f.ha11.be
:fumi$nlQld, p6X't'a.ra't\ed 0~ ~li,cil""l!l ahElAln'1 c1tt:.helrl.,uuh ~
t .1"2 Ci:UJSiiSD COA~SB 9'1'ONZ: Crushed eOa.'C'.!Ui stone for 8x:fi.l1::rat:Lon
treru.;r~ ahalI.oont:or. tototte J..at>>8,t:il:'e'w.8.1.aoi: t-hel"DO't'
$peci:f'iellit:iQ5'1$ see'l:.iOrt9.nl~o.rNo. 401'Noc,. -! &t:on..
2."13
F!:L'.r:tB. CLOTH: Filter ciothior exf.tltratJ.ontreneh ~hAii be
Sira!i 1.0.1- as manutat:tured: l:>y th. Celan... eo.tpo.r.t:ion, or
S'EiibilfiJ.'ika:'T140:lta6 td4nUf4ot~~ ~y Afitr'tufi~rt"t<<C~.1iyl' of
a.pproved.cr.tal..
,
S~UCTaACUILL ;tK ."RA1111Ul AaM.fS..leet bac~11,l over tn...
ex~.L.J.~'Ji.'.t:Leftt.%.'{.nc:m.hA:LloorLe"osa,to .t.:ba. .1;.te'.'t~vi.-.i.oa of; tib&
i"tlOT'spectifi.ca't.tonSflct1on911 '~z' l.1m&.rookbase,.,cempJlcl:*ct to
ninctys.ix fi'6) percent: 0'- "Nadifi8d Proct:or O.ns:i..ty.. r1
2.15 .LANOSCAPES~: Land.sca.pa sitone .shall be two l2l inches t:efou.l."
(4} .inche. .in. a1.z.p and e1:tharr01,lnd-ad ox ugula~type .atone.
2..14
%..16 COMCB'l"t FOa STOR.MINLET'S::' Coneret.tor: rlorm'liUit.ar inlet. JIj.hi6ill
conform 1:0 thil 1.a~t r8vi.ai.oa Of !'OO'l'. ataadaMSp:ee1.licat16ns
seee.tO'A 34'!, Cl... :1. CbJlle~t..h.ll be. ~ee-d U&iA4,l Type I
!t-ort!..an.d e"nt.. ~ sha:l.l att.a1.n .. t.W.Qt~ .1gbt. {t,~ day
oompreas.1.ve at:&'eAgth o:f 300 pal..
2.11~e:t1l\tFOae%btG Sm-=LrRe;[nt"orc1ngst..l tor: d.ratnaqestruQtures
8h~1.J. confom to 1:1\& .t'&q\11.t'emant.e:01'AS'i!H Al$ .e-xeept:tbatth6
0212(}-3
t,
1,
[.. ......------....----.-..---.--...
ii"
,.....
~~ -
Bit,. 05 2od6ii~21Ri1 fl.&f'"p@>,iie
. .J
239-263-04.72 Agenda Item N~.'ff>B7
~
procea. o1:mac~a.ctur. 1fill not,. De .ri&a:~ct.edo. . Si~aM
rei.nfor<::d.Zlgbar=r aball be as shOW orr tn. P1.anB. A11ba~a -h4ll
.1:Ml:llpplRl .net p.3..ae8d l.n a.coo~da>>c. w.1t:h AC:I RQq'tU.2!:fiillfient:e and;
~;t.:j:ca~ion8.
2~-1~ -IROJf.~': .Ircmoe.st:.tngs 1Jba.llconformto tbeJ.a'teat rev1 eicn
of ASfll .Sp.ec,1,t.i.oat1on:s;for C.la-&& 3i>G.1:"<<yZ-ron. A:t.l il%:a't,e ani:(
:fraM pairs sbalJ; be 1ndi.rldu&J.l.y fitted tOo .limn:ete A~i:n9.
Gr!l:btl ana frame ana1.1 b~ 'NQ_ -4.1.3.0 manU.!6ctu~ed by the Urdte<t
States . ~~ and Hanufaetw:ing corpcr.ti,cz, .or azt&pprGv~
.qu41.
Al-1N~~rf'.t;ame9 andoovera an.1.l nave _~hin.d {on lat.be}
be<<rio.g lS"ur~aee. 't-o p,:tt:event :a:ttJ...1.ng W".d.r t2:'af.f.1~.All. CO~~
'8h<<il. haTf: '&oo-ncetlI.edtype p~~.,{n,o.~-pene~:tatii\:q}li:nd ahaJ.l
hay. . the .w.o:rds fl".'t-cJ:Slt.ewer"C"iul~ t.he:reon ..All. sq>>ara ana
~q,eta~gu.la:e;~&J.M\a #' pov.rsand~."t...a:Dali be ind<i.vidu<<11 y
f.it-eed. 4.4 ...t.1!f. al!.d i~~'t.elJ.St~ 4.3 3t.-e. 1n the ti..1.d... ~lca!!ti.ng$
sba1.1be as m.an'tt~iil(:!t:.e" :bY ~te<t$,t.tca ~ry and
tinU'facl::urinq eQ~rat10n.... lIii.thdr&w:j,.~~. numberaaa..hown . Ofi'the
PiAinS, or .ilppf'OTe:d <e.que.l.
..... ...~~CII
..
3.0"1 ~O:bZiiG;
A~ !fanu~attur.r' ii Z.rt.t:ru4t:1.ot\~ ~1.pea,b..1..1 be ha%lld.l.&d;J' st6Nd
and !n,ilt&ll.ed U;sf;rf~t aQaordanoe1iti,"'-~ t..~. P1.pe
.ma.nl,d~4ct.~&r' s in&t~~et.:i.ona. A,ccp,yof ~he. lI.\lulufae~%'e:r f.s
i.n.struetlons Bh;sl~ hlQ ,kept at; t;he ..ite of 'the 1IIOX"k at; a1..1
ti;ma. by t:he Contr.C't.or:?, :tipe h.~l.d 00 aJd.dways lth.a.l.l. net.
be sk1.dded or ro1.1eci B9a:inst: pipe alra<<4yon tbCg:r~.
"8.. When hlmd2.1Dg the pi,ptil! aVOid severe. J.rQpactbl.ows.,. abrasion
dama",e,. a.ncl9~g1niJ 0'1" etttti.ng by lf~t.al .IJ\1rf'aces or rocks ~
PJ:.pa Jdtou..l.d b.!.()'Wer,e4 not ~ .from u\i.eks inte
t~5.
.02 LAYl_ PIPE:
A_ A1.L'p~ precast "$ trUcture..,.~sting&nG O"tha:r 1I:Wm\l'i'act:'Wted
ftesmay.:be,.!nopected t-0'l:.comp1.1an=ewi.th ~
.spaci.fusaUOli.,or defeats be:torel.ayillO,. and a~Y' rejeet.&<l
1tems: shall l.'lIr r~"4 ft'cm the proj*<:.t.
s. Al,J.p.:i.pe a~1:cel:" bei.nq msptm'ti!rdcmdaoc$pt:ed ..ball ~. ~.."i.d :tQ:
the .l-i-mJs:and:ljJs:a.<iee $hown .01) the ~tnqa aDiJ/or as laid
Q.ut by the En~. 'f_ Cem'tr4ctor sball .fur1Ush a1.1 .labor
(1;2?2<t-4
j -
;",
~pr :05 inri:5' 1-1' l '2-7!A''''
I!Il'rf" '''~ , 1 10
235-~G'3-O:4i~ It ':6'
Agenda Item No. 1667
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of25
1............................-.
" >.,.
.;'.
"
. n' .,....
-'- ;.~~'.
1'/
,. .,
....~.....
. ~,~'
. ':::."
.i...~J..:..<.
.. .
.,
4;.:
1.." ,~
"-'il'
C-.
..ad -..t..r1.ai. .~.ta1d.nQ; out. lines (lfta;rades. Ail ~~~!~ ty
pi.". U.n... .au.J.J,. ..btt1.a:idt:o . ~R.~.t t1%"able.t~. ,laV'el:t.
416-T&i;;l,(m1$ . sbo.m ..~th~ Drawi~.. . Gx::adU. shoWell DtllW1'tlgs
4l1d ..11)".rt. oIF~f"U'AJ.;ess ,,-.€,1ea.lly J1ot.ll(io~.ewl~... ,. The
~.,.?~.t.h" ",k.../../ .J.w.h:t-.r4117.r~.NKI Alr.dlJ4id r4.fadJ "t
Smoodt ll.iidurp...t'-orm .J.nve!rf: * . .
1>.
",. ..
Al1 ~ ..h4lltte jointeo U1 s't.!.!;.e-t. .Ci~am::;. 'wttm
ree~t~Ol). ofp.1pa "JS'lItnu1fl_,WM'~,,'J:h. joiA~ .h.~l .be
dea1.gned to lj"mi.t .moVelMAt 4v. t:o.~sion.. ~t.:r:aation!l:nti
no....l..>tt1:ement . 'lb. JAy.~ng .ofp:1pe 1.afilJt:er!ted: 1:r.'~
.ull"'be~noed -at.t;.M ).~.tpointl'a.nd.,5"haU.p.~og.c....
up-grade. AJ.l p1pe e-hal,1 ". c.~ful.ll" l.l.d, 't%'Ue to 1:.he
11ne.' a~d grades. ~i.v~.!'.. wi.th htabs uPOr:afi iU1C tonque end
t:ully u-teret1i.nt;c 'tbabUb.
Whe:n pipe wLth ~4l'_t... N1n,fO%~t.. 01: circula:r: ~;tpe w.1th
e:l11-Pf1eaI. I.-ttt:forc-maen,tie: tt&ed,. tmJp1.pe- e-ha1..1, biic
.1t.uJl:all..d....1~ a. pos..ttion s11Ch t:.hatthe 1DIIt1u,taat.w:t1!la 1:1\&.\1::1(.
Oeld.tfThilt.ed ~t.>p. ~nd.ffbcr>t;~~of 't:be -pt.p...b~ n.ct:.be lUOre
~ five ,; $}tt.p__f'z:omthewnr1:10alpl<<net.Arouq.h the
1on9i.~udi.na1. &X~. af'th4\ p.1.pe.. Anypipa that::'. not true
al.i.'il%l~~t or which sht:waacny lut'ttl~t1t af't.r layinq sh.all
bet;ak.n -up an4 zeJ.ai.d vj..t:h:Out:a4d1t1~~l. =CdP..C1I&1:1i.on.
..
&~., "\1TI.ce~tl' ~ ~ ~~1,.,i.i.nfi'l1t'u11.x:,'fi .ro~M.
0..1: t.a.e pipe$ha:t:t be-it\. ;aeco::Ga:.11otl,,1:tl1 't.\\e dwttd.l.s 5~
on tM ~~v1.l:i.gs" 'IIopipeaba1.1. bel.aid. unt..l1. t.M .~.;u:i41 ~.
~foperiy inplao..
unneoe..arYlll..1.k1ng upoA 'the ~J.eted ,p.t.pe J.1ne. shaJ.l be
avo:U1ed W\t;.1J.. t..::1U\Ch h.a been' baekfi11.,d to. ave;rt;;.ba 'top of
~ep'1.p."
~be in~erlor of tpe pipeshel1..becl.eaced of ail d.tr'tr
jo1nting. me.teria1.a, and.!uperfluous matex-i$la of every
de-scrip:t:1on - .
'!'be Contract.or 8h~J. rtl4!AOve aDd .relAV tauJ.ty s.c.t.~ o~
li~ere1ectffd by BnqLnee::.
IO.AIa: .. .at.U.tMl. rtoppen:~ '.i!'lend "O"f ];It)>. l.aa.tJ.a1.cl ti't a.l..l
tj;_awh.npLpt-~.y;l,;ntJop.ollr~.ticn:5a:r:.ne-ttapJ:o.cu.
(.inoJ:u4i.ng~W1cl:l. boura-), '1:::= ~~ant wa:tfilr..mud or
other.n>raiqn mati!rials fro.tl'\ 'l!nt6r1~ t.he ptpa.%tl$u::e ~:ll.
eO!'H!I'f;%'U(:t1on con,fo=aste> Sect;1cm 430 o:f i"DO'I' Sten.dard
S:p4Ilt;1.fl.c.a.tioNJ.
s.
F.
G.a
!l.
0.2;ZO"'"!5
f
Hpl" 052005 jjsZ8Hl1 l\&f,p(O,110
239-26"3-0472...7
. Agenda Item No. 1687
_o____~ _'0,_-._""- -_., -,__. May-10,-.2006
Page 19 of 25
-I
I
t
t"
I
f
f
t
J:.. !te bae}e~i1.1..t.n~1 except. ~Qr seClllr1nq p.$.p6. :In 91<<~..
..1-1. ~.deneW'r~Utfl.ih'Ul1;ne.rha.l!J ,i.nbpect.4Kl :the jo:tn.t$J
&J.1.q~nt..I!I:n-d_a. .in thesect10n 1e..id...s.u(:h inspection
shall not reii.vv the Con~rAetor ot lL.b~lity ~n eaae of
defi!let.i.--ve work .shQ1Ifinq Up' J..te.t" <f
. -
'3-. 03U!'Illl"RATION TUNC<< i Tbe exf11.tr.t i.ontr:enches _ . shal;! b~~ilVa-tef;i
'to -ttte '1:1>>a5.. ~U..mtm51.CD" .00 9'C'ildesshown 'l)o1') the.J!l.l.a!z:Il. ".be
.fUtar "cloth shiIL1.1 b. pl"aoea i.n 't,hepptln 'trench in allJc:tiOl1$ of
.$ufr1c.tent l.en9th to bave an overlap or. tow (2} t'ee:t :cvertbetop
Oft~ trencb Wh.n :fi.U8dto t!l~ required el.e'Vati.on with tloar.tfill
$'tone.Mjae-ant i1.at.ions of .i:i:.;tt.er C1.oth .sha.l.l be lapp.,done U,
'foot... COarse "emesh_1J.M pl..oed .ami .'Leveled to' 'tn. el.l!!i~t:.lOti
oftb& bottom 01' the pipe.. Aft_. :aa.tI41bl.y e.t\c:i P2.e.cemen~Of pi.pe
.sections to line and gr.ade~ tJ:t.r_1nd.~ 'Of 'the ~.&.~ aton.
shall. oep1.aced>r taki.ngeUs not: to lSi,l5'tu.rb ..t.mt 'p.l:a.c~e Qf t.3r;e
pipe.. Uter le-vel.l.ng ct .~ eoar,s8 atone :to' the top' tU..e'\P'at..ion .
!thown antne P!atHi,tba f.11 'ee.r- c1.oth -tl<;is S:bal.lbe. oVflZ"::Lappa4 ..
((i.stAnce of. '1:.'110 (2} .feet at the top at t::he 'C.r~..
If I;betrenabi.-sin .. .re':.e!rticn .basin. &Aa, either lanQ.&cap6
.:sten. or .u~t.b.1.'e T.J~&Zd .'b1itckf"i 1.1 mat-er.ia1..." il'8 :Shown on th.e
pl..n.s, $hall boa PJ.4~'!Id on 'the, fi1.ter c:1.otb to 'the ~l.vati.on of
the bQt:1::cmt ~ the be-sin. I1:the i;;ren~h 1." under a piiqd area,
baekf.il..l.ah.All...be eithe.rsuital:)le .!:Cn~d ba.oJc.:f:il~ .-taxia.l ()~
lirnercet- baso m~U;lltr:ial, as shown on thaF.t&tL.s" .1:;o.:the elevati($.!:t
^Of -pa~me:nt s'lli:>9ra.de.
Cp.r;ruq;a~ pO'lyitth.Ylftepipe ,ha~~ bapla..c6dtoth& lines'lind
9:.E'adee $b0\9n en. the Plan. ana assembled acccrd.1n9 to tAe
mAr1\4:f....~l1J:e.l'.1!J 1n,s-t:ruct:ions7 u<<1n.q f'it:tinga suttP~1.ed by tb4 .
lnSnut'aatw:-.r foz: the type o.t pj.pe being used. niter cl:ct'b ,s1uUl
be 4to~1h.nd.tecLllnd ilusta:.lJ.<<d aee-crdit1~ to 'the lNln12:fa.et::u%:"~ri$
.i.n8'truet.1ona.
:L~4 $tfALts MIlt) ~"rENT!ON: s..a..s1:KS: Sv&liil. a.nd ~t'.en.t:.i..c:m ~l\$; slwUl be
t'onst:t'Ucted at1:he l.oeat.io:na And 9rades '$AClIifROft the Plana.
O'lniral.l d.iman&i OtiS- .. ai.dfJlUcpes ,endqr-adO$S"hown 'oa:t.heplans
sbal)' De 4<Da6-:t"edto a$ eiose.:ly .., post.t.iblG to .IUllure ~t.si.gn
voJ.umes: Ifr-e irtta.1.n.e<i ~ TOl..eranee- fQt:horJ.zonta~ d~..,1on4,.h.J.1.
b6 P~l1$ or ~.' t'W(t t.2) percent.. a,.'"1d ~or gra~ Irha.ll h pluao:r:-
Dd.t'111:Ss-e.rJ:> ~ol.nt. on~ (0-..:1 J fe~_ 1UIovance .shUl. bit ..~ :fo.% -t:t..
th.i.;:1m.S'8.0'f~ IRXi l!fhen th. ~a:i..sh gr..uu.ng ~tion:s. are king
pe.r;-,f'onaed !~ &Jtea.at;.o -1M'J:oe;lv. aOd<<
1. 0$ ~'.NBDf51'.S'ZO~"t'CR XNLns"ftoml :anb !f.ARBOL.iSS, a-n
CoNCQ'~TE_~1U.l.S ;
027~o-6
J
't:
.
"',J.
1
i
t~
t
1
I
I
-I
i
I
1
I
i
t
I
i
-I
Rp,. '05 zut'i$ i i $ '~BAAb.n' fP~ I 11 e
-Zas -263 -'o4"1"e po .8
Agenda Item No. 1687
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 25
A,
8t.CtlmlHa't- ;Inlets 1 St.OJ:llDfl&tm: .inl.eta .1'''111.1. M c.ottatructad a-e
the l.ooat.iot\Jt 'anc1g-J:adel!l .hown .:tntb-. P:lana.. The boiot.Cft and
.i;op a..lIIbo-t::1nJ.et..hal.l .1:)$ 3:0QQpL .Qone~ ....s,~non
tb.a .i"l~Jtrt. ."..u oE;a.n.l..t.o-.aybee.i4b.t (.a),1.~hconex:..t.
b-1.ock wl:th A1.1~11s t1119d with conerete9r_~ ~ ~~. point.
wbel"e pipes penet.catetbta. inlet wait ahall be tbo:rouqhly
..-led wi.tb portl~ e..-nt Gr01lt. ?'1p&$ 5ha.l..lb. .cut.. o:f'f
flush with the in-sldefae\t o:ttbe.'1n.1i11t "..11. Iron :fra'l'fea
shell be cast;UU:ot;h. cooereteto,p o~ the U1.et so tbatt.he
tWo au:. ~dec1 toqetbe:.s atr.n1t: .preoast i.n.letsl'MiY M
u.sedi.f appr0\'e4 blytD,e Snghl~.1':..
Junc~ionBQ"...f -~ol.. ,andK..<1W1l11-a; Con'at:.r:u.ct :t U-<"'lcti:CD
bex:..,!l'to~ aew.: ....MolMp a..tl.d co-nerate. lte.d.wa1.~s at
l...xra..tLon. and to dap-tba ind1ca1;ad on tl.rawin:gtt and .in
eo.ao=-danC4;wLth. _t:.aU. .bow.n t:.harecn..Ex.eavat:.. And biLcJd!iil
.1n .ccordan.eewl:thAp~llca"b.l.e. seQt.!on.e of .:pee.1t'i.ca'tlons"
concrete Zor 'tbacat.OhbaeiniIJ, l'ltor.m ..wsrl'DilllAol.jJs ..ned
con.cret.e- headwall." a'ha1l de:T91~.dompr.91!it.e st.renvth ot
!OOOpd ~. 'bftetJ'fY .1..gJitt28) days - .hal.j,O~U.. bet:w&4!m
w&11.s aM i:ncdilili:ugand ou~ci~~ pi... wi.t..~ !'ort..ltand C~t
Mor.....a% t:o' l'~ A. wat.a::ti;;ht..jo.i:&4t,;,
Cut ort a.1..l pii'e. aA4 j~.u:u:::t:;iot1 bCK..t ~t.o~ savar manho.lesl
"aI3d.. DOR.~'tft ba..cbtalls t'lush wi thtb.e &ceo~ "th..trtlot..u.re
antlgrout'bro)ctlln.'4ijmd,sO% the pipetJ~'W'.ithecrtll!lndCeDent.
Horta:r to .. ~otb uni~O%1'fl coverio9 w1 th no fin;.~.:l exposed..
All. $-'tructure$ sb.aJ.l c.r"nfQ%ft, to Serc:tic-n5 40C}" 41$~ .ana 4:t5
ot .FOOT Standard gp.c:d.:li.ctll't1ona.
c~ Grated. .Ime'ts liDia, J'\ifie'ti.on zons:Grated ..t..a1.a-ta L'"lG :)unct.icn
bO.. '8l'U!l..l ~ c:on~t.rw:tedat tbe lo-ce1:icme etndr ,gra.de.$ .$:J'i.own
on the Pl.ans..The bot-taa arA! top ala1'> of 1111..;:'. s.b-A.B.. be,
3000 P5:i. ~nc,rete. as !lihown 0)'), .\::be.. ]?l.lItA8 - .1IaLJ. 01a:tcnJ.ete1'l'.ay
he ei9A1I... .(e!1~o.n. 3aOfl'p.s:L .can-r;;rrtlt.o-r .e1.q'h't {S} .inQtte'
C!O:qc:ret::e bLock Wilth. 1I1~ c.J.le: fJ.ll.c with oenaret. grout.
Th. po.i.nt whare: pipeapanetrat.a 'the inle.t wall she.ll be eut
c,ff f1.tt&h w.t.t:hthe tnlJi,dafacaofthe l.nlet wa11.Iron
tr~. ;$h6:11b~c.a.tj",ntot.haOC:I:tQ!:e.t..e: .t()p 01 1:1\. i:nl.et s>.c>
that t.1'Wttwo a%". .t>r.:mdad t0getbf:'X' as a uaie. .Pr'eaaat.i.n.l.e-t..
__y be uaed if approved b)"tbe Efi9".1ne1!!:S:..
!!..
~_o, ~HZXCAV'A~!,ON '{
A. Ge.neX'~l; Treneh.s fOX:Jl.tpa~1v":Et;.3 .and. ~or.lI!J;:.o:r:meew.:rs
shal.l :00 ftxG&""i'.t.ed to the r.qtt1..r:-.a depth and to a, wia'l:h
5'l1"f'f::t.cLent. to p::ov1.dieadequ.atework1nCj rexa.. l"orp!pa 1.1n-es
p.1:aeed abov.t.be n~l't;uza.1.g.rc'Und ,U.D6,tbe lfm'b.JU1._r.f1:.sha.l.l
Q2:120-"1
j;.
fjpl" 05 2005 i b 28Rk bAt" ~ pt'; fie
239-Z63-U472 p s
Agenda Item No. {587
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 25
~
i
.~
:be plac.<< an.a compactedj pr:ior to exo&.vat:lon o~ the trench,
to an .l;av&t1on at l.e&st "t.wo (2 ~ f..t above t:.lNt top of the
pipe" am.t to .. wj,~ ~lto four (4lp:lp.cti.aaet.e't$.,ami
thf:--t:reuchthat1ex:Gav<<tetl to ..t,be requ.ired .qr.. ~Wh..::. " ..pipe
~~ 1.. undercQ"t .it amu.l be :brought to the t.'~red gz;...
~lIinq.QJ.taDle,:u:tcu:.i.a.~~ iin4.n.u.1. be conpaetedto lUtch the
'~.si't.yo~ tlte.,so1..1. .;ta wh:icb the tren.ch. . well. C\1t.
,8. J:li.pe ~li.r'rban Twent.y hUi. l2.4l ~: !rot 41.1. p!pe1es:J.
than twenty fou.r(2cf i1iCfttH' J.ft d!amet...:e... t.he t-~c!l ;DottCllll
me,y be e1.the:t" 1'1.a1:. 0%' ahapad to ~1:t th~ bt;rt..-ecm. .o:€ the pi.pa
and. axeca: 9JCC'S'Va't:.ion .1& r~ mtdartJ:u~hub.eo.ll'ow thi;
pipe bor:z=::el.- to z:e1!t.:fin\lly d1\ -th. -trea;chbotto;:t..
Coo .Pi:pe 'h:rtm't.y ~ou:r: {2<l) :%~~ and. 1.arge~.; .F~i!'ll..p.j.p.
~"Ie%'ta ..6t\d &-f;$ER ..we.rstwen.t:y fou..rt2.l) .J.DQbe,,smd .larger
in~_teZf "the bed-d:inqahallhe ..sha.p4<1.to c:onf'O:r:Ift to the
GUt.ichit of. ~ p1.pe:, for~ deptb of AOt: l:aslS '!::hatt. ten (lG)
parc~nt: ot it.1l ''c:qt<<l heoi9ht' tout.side \'iilHd"~l Qd
recesses F""..!ded t.o =-c:ei.. 'the ball....
C.. tft1HJ.t.ab.1. Miit&r1.al.:_ When ~cckl' 1)ou1.4e~s, or~'r
iifij.i..::rd:1:tl::g 'ma~e::1..ala are eno.-ounte:tM' i~ i:ha t:.rench .t.ot.t>.cm",
~QY sba:U. be. r~ed 'eO" depth. of' at; l.....t twe1.va {12}
.inches- beJ.owthe bQt;.tooa .1:ff t~ pd.,pe. ~k -or .~ao~t
material. CQmJi.~..nt -by-the&nq1neez: t.o "b& UmJ\l~-tAbJ."ea.$ ,
:f~f:ii,on Eor the pj.pe snallbe ~~ to the. 4-ept.~
.rtilq~1rti'4 fQx ohta.in..in~ la fi.J:m fQU.~tiO!l, and as d1.re-.cted by
the- Enyi.nee;:.
E. Pip& Bec:kUnq: 'W'nen un~~1.ftg .1. r~ired# ~ cz6er to
.:-.movtt unsui tab.1.e ~.:r1U tlle trench shall be'. Me4dilled t.o
'. ~. oi ai-x {6) 1ncbe& balow t.he top p:iP6'1d-th sui.~:le"
q-ruul~t:' 'N't..r1.e~ -vhi.chw.tl.l. tcraaf:i.J!!:a ~ m:J; .~ Jd,pa,.
ad the be'tt.ce f!~ . he .b&'pHw-..tt~tn.-pi;.....hd1 b4-44.i.nq
ma-teru"J..shal..l W oo.~.. sand or othar au1 tab],. grcmul.Br
~e~iAl. obt.a:"ined from tb. t;lrad.L~ oparations o:n tb~
~(ijeot;fo:r ao:~e.ial ma-ter i-a2..
F.. tnsU~..lati.cn Ulide.r Wet Cond.:lt1on.. ~ Th~ Ccn.tra4i:o.r shal.1.
de'ft'tertrenc.bAits ~"'.;.d &>lc&."'.ticmsby p1i:mp!nqmet.hOdS
:J.nelud.in, we.1i~ po:1:nti.ng. Where 8Jt~t.l:.6M.l,ly vet .eODd11:i~.
~re auen. .tha:tP\1IDP:Ln:g- .&rid "HUt. ~i.nti.nql.M''t:i\od. ~. DOt
effec::tl:ri, t:hlli COfttra....."'1:cr =ay .request to \1tt~ s61.eGt Mtld:t.n,s
ueerilil.,athit; expenae..
0'2'72 tl-8
ffpr OS -2orls i j t-z.sm, :bef ~p~ J 11 0
23'e-Z-6a--047Xgenda Item No. 'sJP
May 10, 2005
Page 22 of 25
:s~tt7 lIACKnLLmCi 'O.i" ?:ilDOm1h
::,;~"...
A~
Bedding .1:0 cen1:erltaf!: Tbii. material.. .l)eft..'fht..ti'hii~nche8 of
t.he pipe and. !d>ove any lDeck!1Dqsha.ll ~ placed 1ft $1. f61
iDem l_y.%';tJ!e~ct-ed t.td:,cme5S) L"1dCOllDPaC~ed: w:t'tb
8111t4h.nl~ t.........r. .1.1l1;..bl.~ f$C 'tht.. b"l1:POIla..
..
3.
Cente-r.li:t:1* t.o OD:. U} Poo-tAbove T<tpoti'"Lpec. rhel'llA'lilt:i:...
alonq-the .s.1.des 0% the, plpe.and to'a., poi.nt.'ofat:t..at,
on. fl.) .foot. abOV4i th. top o~ the pi.pe sball b& p.laced .in s-1J<
(~l i.nch 1..p:t'4reoarpae;~thi.OJm...) .nd compaet:.a witn
a-pprop:d..ate equi:pment.. '1'h. width of e:ompaot.:lonahaJ.lexten.;;l
a a.1a1au& ,dj..~M ~al to t;wo {2j tJ.a.\ea ..theouta.1dt!l
d.1mM\t..r ot t.ft<4\p1~ dti e.i.t:l\et' aide of ene-pipe.
G..
BiIO~1::overanetl; ~ J'OO't AbeT. Tope! ~ip. :'fh~ ~tet'ta:l
"~.gneU,}ft:)ota.hov.'tJu.t t."Op oft-hi&. ),>.ipe "to t:htt Det.ter::. of
the subqra4e or -en. f':t'n1a.b*€i au.%:f1l:Oe o~ t;.h.e. ~~i:i" :a<'e
appr:e;pr~atd-;I!hal.l ", ,pl<<c.a in :laYers DQt: to ....~_ 0"'4 tlJ
~O()t;1n t.h;l,~:Jtneafj "lmdoompact.d.wi.:th.~Qpl'i.t;. equ:i~n:t",
~&eticn: 1\,11 backfill oha:11 ~. compacted to mms.i.ty of at
leet., n..i:n1l"{;.l' five ".,S} per.centot t..h. -..x1-mum density as.
det.~l'H!WI by"f:.be ~f.1_proclbo.r~~!tY.(Aft'ffm.SS7}..
Z)"
3.08 ',f;U!J!'liiiG!:
.1\... COl'lCl".t:.~Cono:et.e ~~.'..:lve It:'btt.n~ ~ll be t:e.eted. ~y
anappro:\1"ad 't.1i"i,~1ft9 laboratOJ:"Yby ".UlII Q'C e.t.antiard c:yl.~der
te.st. A mi:n;;imtmr o'f On.~(1} test {.set: of t.b:J:oee is} cyl.i.~.$)
sha'll h. t.aken ~er .eel) 'ten (1.0'" cubic }-ard# at c.onorete
.PCUrM.. A,:(Id!:t:!on.J; t:..-t.e may be order'e<1 by "the I:ng:tn... of .,
neces.$~Y forqual.i ty . eO!l1:Z'"O:l" .Conc.retete~t1>>q aba'!)'
~onf'6:m1l 1:(> A,SlQl e:u .M14. e',..
,
8. h'Cxt.111:..n l'ave~ "'~A$ U~:lt%il. U.ti.OD x.it$meb i: 1t ain~Df
an. t1.} c~ct1:tm te:Jt pa:2oCO 1.1iUS6t- fMt on ho.cU'!11 over
'tbaexfiltJ::'at,ion trench .ebA1.1. be taken: randOlfd.y s4it.lect._
lo<;at1onsby an ap~rovH t.aot.inglaboZ!at.ory.. Ad.d1:ticm;;al
t...t:! . may .~ ord.eract :by t:he. sng:i.n...x: if deeaad neee!t.hzy :f'o~
:qua2J.ty coau<:J1.. byl:rac'kt'.1II.fa11:ing to-.'t c~at:i.on
spal:U..f.i.oaticms s..ba.U. De 2!.c~etAtd; or~lac-.d 'and
r,ee~ac't:ed 03 nacftsary toa:ah1.eve specJ.f'i.lI!K\l dAi6'$'ity..
Co.mpact.ion t:eat.i:nq aha.ll. C::Qnfol:1!t t',OJlJ.~.olS$1.
0272&-9
1
l.
,..,. 2"'Z ?005 4: :alP';
8318812U5 ~~4T
239-Z63....tl47~genda Item No.'1'6t7
JiiGjt~ . ~a~;~1tt
JENSEN ~
UNoeaGRDUMD tmUnaa~lNC. tiC. 10'1l2
$585 TA~ROAD. NAPLes. Ft 34'* r>>ne ~
.. PHoJi~M1""-M$O PAliCS4t-.'t~' .&HSEl'NO. lOf~ --:
~~'I.JniJw:, ~'iliOlIJ_!"fIi!~~~V~ t"l.r..fGlIi)lCQ.
.b&F I ,.~. i i e
7335918661
f'RO~~rnzl'O;
HAMee~;R FO\.:EY
~i.~~~J
STAT!! . n
PH!DtE ~'lZl'2 "AX: 2\U-Qa,7;a
~=
WCAKTO.R"'~DAT~
DELMAR mAil Si.fOFFi&s'
-..taiLi
CiTY ~
!lA1'IH"Pl.iANa1~
~ ~..~_., '.".__..,~,."
'W.'JwnrfJy.~.,~~tr.th.~..~..pMr."._~~.. ~....l~i._~
AS PER ATTACHEDBREAKOOWN'
J:.lRAlNAGESYS1'EM.OPP SiTE
TOTAL."
........
~~'II'"."
s.....85UIG
.~ ~"'~FORPlU'ttAaU1'lt.J1'jftfiO'TUlCA11iDaYtMe..-.ec~ ~
2J'~~l~.~O.V~~"
i) NG,~"~~V"'TtwlOR.UMOVAJ..,
.) N,O~GRROCfoU:eROM~'tn'E.
$)J\lC waunADf..E FlU.lUiMCVAi. OR:JUiIlILA(;~ ACCV"tAlSLt!t ItATeRtAt..
.*,cct...t;...T~ ~~~JSCft,!MJIAeTFJiI!8.
,?t~NeMS'f"M8~.V COU1!nY
II ~1A'fQ9T1NO~ GIlt $Hfi... ....CMiS ~
$) 1m oatWft"tlEt'r1Mt ~.
AI ftilt!"'..~ $I; ~Ma.:" a.~...;;t _~.~t=be:4Wrl0t'l'UCf. in Ila~~t'___ ~!!Y"" lIlrMl
_'i~ ml u,.~_~~... ~.'~JI\J'tlft"-""~"""-I_~"""__.jfIlIl!Ul!llUt"'''''_fim_''''AUWi
dal....1lItib~JI)'m....w_ l'U." fvjjQw&: .__1IIft -...~---.:.- __4_~ctau:,:tIf ~.
~uDv~; . .
J.!';Jt8Bj dHDuMOUJfD~..s..
Mf~e~~~~L~",,,,,~~~.W$-~"~'~--.""'-~~
(ji..n_~Hi~"~~~.~(lI~~"!l:f:'*'~~tfr.".4!lL'~l!!M~
~~~~~ 'w........,,~~....;~c~~'Y~G\"',~~lIIJ'~~tl!f,.'.
~ WMRGIlCUHt\W1LmH ~
.'NOIlir. CDllt~:mar-~.~.,!ly"""'-~~~-L~,
. ,"~hpfFnclII:of''''~
TJw~~j~aftIf~_" .._i.n..III'JI6...~.....~tU. 1fs.i.,. _iWWrJIt"'.....,.
_~JMlt:.lit~..-___.wa..~
al:IMlW.
~pr ~~ ~oos 4t~jPH b8fLP~.ilo
6~/./H8S !lkl1l1 22'IH?ttS1
.JllNSEN'.~ UTft.lTIIfS, JNC.
JrW,UI:C':'T:OEl..MMRnAL 8KOP'I!'-
l"'~ ,a..av
.oA.Te:.or:vu.Ma, ....e.1!'J 2
~,.
. IiD1IW*OJU\lK...e&V&TI!M.DFF.srrf! .......
\ 42"RGP~
2,42"BlOCI< PWGS
S- AOO'H~:t!'~VAr.JON.
'TGTA1.9RAttfAGES~STEM"OI'F.'.ili
TOTAl. ....
t
QU.Mm'P'I'
1020 \.F
..SA
lmLF
~
23S-Z63-il47"z . . . 2
Agenda Item Nt 1687
~~. ~_4~
~'ltft13
,~ ~.(')F 2
lWD'8Ila
~,.
.. ...
CC'WrMlllOUilI't
1.~
",00
...eo
104"Ne.OO
1;1&&~eo
<<lJlOO,'oO
......,6.00
i~.1O
Delmar Plaza
Wildwood Lakes POO
LASIP Development Agreement
April 12, 2005
Agenda Item No. 1687
May 10, 2005
Page 25 of 25
CONTRACTOR WARRANTY
Contractor shall obtain and assign to Owner all express warranties given to Contractor or any
subcontractors by any materialmen supplying materials, equipment or fixtures to be incorporated
into the Project. Contractor warrants to Owner that any materials and equipment furnished under
the Contract Documents shall be new unless otherwise specified, and that all Work shall be of
good quality, free from all defects and in conformance with the Contract Documents.
Contractor further warrants to Owner that all materials and equipment furnished under the
Contract Documents shall be applied, installed, connected, erected, used, cleaned and
conditioned in accordance with the instructions of the applicable manufacturers, fabricators,
suppliers or processors except as otherwise provided for in the Contract Documents.
If, within one (1) year after final completion, any Work is found to be defective or not in
conformance with the Contract Documents, Contractor shall correct it promptly after receipt of
written notice from Owner. Contractor shall also be responsible for and pay for replacement or
repair of adjacent materials or Work which may be damaged as a result of such replacement or
repair. These warranties are in addition to those implied warranties to which Owner is entitled as
a matter of law.
Agenda Item No. 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 23
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation that the Board reject Bid #05-3780 "Motorola Central Control Irrigation
Supplies and Services".
OBJECTIVE: To reject Bid #05-3780 "Motorola Central Control Irrigation Supplies and
Services."
CONSIDERATION:
On February 28, 2005, the Purchasing Department sent notices to the only two (2) qualified
Motorola vendors in the State of Florida for Bid #05-3780 "Motorola Central Control and
Irrigation Supplies and Services."
On March 23, 2005, the bids were due into the Purchasing Department. Two bids were received.
One from Contemporary Controls & Communications, Inc. and the second from AG TRONIX
Inc. Due to submission irregularities, both bids were found to be non-responsive. Purchasing
advises that the bid be reformatted and re-advertised.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
-
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact associated
with this Executive Summary.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board reject Bid #05-3780 "Motorola Central Control
Irrigation Supplies and Services" submitted and direct staff to re-advertise and re-bid the
equipment and services.
Prepared by: Pamela J. Lulich, RLA, Project Manager, Alternative Transportation Modes
Department
-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 16B8
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 23
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1688
Recommendation that the Board reject bid #OS~3780 ~Motorala Central Control Irrigation
Supplies and Services ~
5il0/2005 90000 AM
Prepared By
4/201200511:01:12 AM
P.nnela J. lulich
Transportion Services
Date
Project Manager
Traffic Operation'5/ ATM
Datu
Approved By
Pamula J. Lulich
Trans.portiofl 5(~fVic(!~
Proje:ct Manager
Tnlffic Opm;aticlru,1 ATM
4/201200511 :01 AM
Date
Approved By
Brenda Brilhart
Administrative Services
Purchasing Agent
Purchuing
"'120/200511:59 AM
Acquisition Manager
Date
Approved By
Mike Hauer
AdminlMtative Servil:p.1>
Purchasing
"122110059:03 AM
D.Jte
Approved By
Sharon Newman
Transportion Services
Accounting Supervisor
Transportation Administration
4/271200510:16 AM
Date
Approved By
Diane B. Flagg
Trans-portion Services
Oimctol' of Alternativl! TranSp(HtaHon
Modes ATM Direc10t
Alterna1ive Transportation Modes
"'127/200510:22 AM
Date
Approved By
Steve Carnell
AdminiJl.tr~ltivfl SI~rvicl~S
Purchasing/General SVcs Director
Purchasing
<l127f200511:24 AM
03te
Approved By
Nonn E. Feder, AICP
Transpor1fl)" Services
Transpor13tion Division Administrator
Transportation Services Admin.
4!2811005 6:46 AM
Date
Approved By
Glori,) Hel'Tl!f'3
Transportion Services
M..magmnent/ButJget AnalY!l-t
rranspor13tioo Operations
412B/2005 8:,(8 AM
Datu
Approved By
Pat l<<!hnhard
Transportation Services
Executive Secfl!tary
Transportation Services Admin
4128/20059:31 AM
Datlt!
Approved By
OMB Coorrlinntor
County Manager's Office
Administra1ive Ass.!Ktant
Office of Management ,\ Budget
4'28120054:26 PM
Date
Approved By
Mark Isacltsoll
County Mmw!ll~r's Offic.e
Budget Analyst
Offil;(! r>t Managr.nwllt 8. 8(ldUp.f
51212005 12:15 PM
Dilte
Approved By
Michael Srnykows.kj
County Manager's Office
Management & Budget Dir~<;:tor
Office of Management & Budget
5!21200S 6:34 PM
Datl~
Approved By
JalTles V. Mudd
Board of County
Comlllissioners
County M.mag.!r
County Milfl39cr's Offlce
Si41200S '3:39 AM
.....-.-
C\I
'E
Gl
CIJ
<II
,~
"0
z
'5
3~
E~:g
<1115<'5
Q.-~
;,;~'"
0>8."
:E",~
oC:o
,~~
0:
'"
8
'2:
<I>
'OCIJ
~'O
C c:
8 :
(ij ,!!!
oEB:
~~~
t?<IIC:
Lb e,2
000;
i:i o.tJ)e
iIi:E.=
~ ~
III oll.Q
8.!!1 5 .
Eo - (.)
.::: c c:
Glc::J-
- 0 E
g c..> E
c..> 0
c..>
~
Z
O.
0: g
~-
6
~
c:
o
5iJ
.~ ~
cZ!
1J
c:
III
..
III
::i
ti
::J
~
a.
III
jE...
o~
::i!
c::
OJ
Z
N
N
:I:
~
1il
OJ
Gl
:0
~
... III
Gl.s:::.
'~ lil
QiO:
c>
UJOl
o
m
w
w
CI)
0)
~
....
....
w
'c
::l
~
a.
Ql
(.)
'c
Q.
~
Ql
~
III
ell
... E
Gl ,2
,st .s
~~::J
:!!>
UJC')
C\I
~
o
CD
W
UJ
(J)
.....
.....
M
(IT
-
'c
::l
~
Q.
Ql
(.)
'c
Q.
/'
a.
E
~
..j
l.L.
o
U')
~
o
..J
I~
a.
a.
::J
(J)
...
CD
~
o
QjQ.
:g~
U...
M
o
CD
UJ
UJ
(J)
o
CD
~
(IT
-
'c
:J
CD
Q.
Gl
(.)
'c
0-
Gl
:0
<II
c..>
~
o
Q.
c..>
~
Lt)
Qj z_'
:g
u:i:
..,
o
CD
w
UJ
CIJ
ell
Z
-
'c
:J
Qi
Q.
Gl
(.)
'c
Q.
Gl
J5
III
U
Qi
~
o
Q.
U
o
Ol
m:J
:g9
U:I:
II)
o
m
w
W
(J)
ell
Z
'2
::l
Q;
Q.
Gl
(.)
'c
Q.
.9
U
~
gj~
0...
U...
CD
o
CD
W
W
(J)
~
c
:J
Qi
0-
Gl
(.)
'c
Q.
.E:-
o.
a.
::J
CI)
Qi
:;:
o
Q.
U
o
>
C\l
...
>-
0:
W
1=
~
II)
::ii
:J
J:
~
::::i
0>
'2 M
00
",M
lllM
cN
III 0:
Q.U
,...
o
CD
W
W
CI)
.....
CD
M
(IT
'2
:J
Qi
Q.
Ql
o
'<::
Q.
~
Q)
... ~
l!3~
'0> _
~g
WOl
III
-
o
CD
w
w
CI)
Ol
01
...
...
(IT
'2
:J
Qi
0-
Q)
o
tf.
s
o
~
~C\i
-.c..>
~~
:J~
'5 Ql
~e
_0-
o
E e
o ::J
UCIJ
Ol
o
m
W
W
CI)
Ol
CD
C\i
III
...
(IT
-
c
:J
Qi
Q.
Ql
o
'<::
0-
~
:J
o
CD
Z
g~
-.U
~o
en ...
:J 0
.s:::.~
lilo
~O::
e Q)
E e>
o ::J
uen
Cl
....
o
CD
W
W
CI)
CD
...
ai
..,
....
w
-
'c
:J
~
0-
Ql
(.)
[t
Agenda Item No. 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 23
It)
o
o
~
Cl)
~
o
CD
W
UJ
en
Gl
0>
III
Q.
Ol
CD
C\i
Lt)
....
(IT
'c
:J
CD
0-
Gl
(.)
'c
Q.
c
~
::J
o
co
rjU
c:~
- >
.V
~C\l
:J 0
'5~
~e
-e';
~ ~
uen
...
....
.0
...1
Gl
-'"
al
.s:::.
C'I
c:
CD
rn
Ul
,~
C
:z
,C
o
=::E
3~lt)
~]~
o."",~
.. '"
-'1::
0>8."
::E Ul ~
&i lij 0
"2" .=
0.
Ul
,~
~
CD
oOO
.b'C
I: I:
8:
~~
o I: a.
<Xl"':::>
~Ooo
C?sg
:g~~
-000>
ai::E~
e
Agenda Item No. 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 23
e
~
~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
iXi iXi iXi iXi iXi iXi iXi ii5 iXi iXi iXi ii5
w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w
en en rn en en en rn en en en en en
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l;!! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
z z
,... - := - - - - - - - - ,...
I: '2 c: '2 c: 'c '2 '2 'c:; 'c:; 'C c:
:J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J
(j; (j; ... CD (j; Gi Gi ~ Iii (j; Iii Iii
CD
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. a.. a.. a.. a.. a..
CD B ~ CD CD CD CD CD ~ CD CD 0)
0 ,g ,g 0 .g <> 1 0 ,g .2
'C 'C: 'C it 'C: 'C 'C '2 n:
a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. 0. a.. a..
!
C u
0 ~ ~
tl CD a: 'ii l\l
0) C
e :.::J 12 'E 1'2 E E
c. 0 0 0
en III ~ Z
CD c( W uS ~ :;:- -
u ~ <.l > g~ u 0) g 0
.E :::> .E 0 .E C) .E Q. "" I/)
I/) C'I -:< C g c: c:
< 0 < ... c(w < '2 < l!1 !!l I/) c'f> Q)
en c: en c: enC) en .E en i6 CD c: c: !E. en c:
:J I~ :J ,g :Ja: :J ~ :J c. 0) 0) c: c: 0
c: 8 a E ~ E g c. 'iij 'iij ~
,c ,C ~ ,c:J ~ .c i=
l!l 0 ~ l!lrn t:: ld 2 2 ~ II: a: CiS
e ,c
,C S en l!1 iii c: iii l!1 ~ ""
t- o t- t-o t- ~ :::> ...
:t:: 0. en .!! .E 8 E8 .!! .!! ,2 .9 ...
e g~ e e CD ... 0)
~ e CD ~ :0 CD CD I/) CD CD ~Q (j; u CD,C
c: en c: ~ "8 "8 ~ ~ I/) E E 1: 1:1
c:o :::> '~ c: '~ .~ c: '2: '2
~ e 'iij 0 g
8 8 :::> 8:: :::> l:: :::> ,- :::> ~ :E~
en 0 a.. 0 t- oa:: oa: J:~ J:
N C"l .. III CD .... II) Q) ~ ... ~ C"l
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... N N
C'I
&
'"
a..
.0,
0;
""
<>
CD
,C
C\I
'E
<II
en
'"
,~
(5
z
J::.
U
3~
E~~
~,g~
;.:{gC<l
~~~
~eO
'0'1-
e:
'"
~
'~
Q)
:g~
c: t:
o '"
0",
-a; ,!!!
~Q..
ot:Q.
00"'::1
....Oen
"''''t:
tbog
COfCS
-0 (5.~
iii:=.i:
!:i
E
::J
U
<II
>
o
"i
o
g Gi
Qla;
E E
~~
....
N
o
i'ii
w
w
en
~
c
::>
li>
Q.
<II
u
1::::
Q.
~.~
1S5
ll) ~
:110 <II
I-Q.
!:t.B
~it
Co
a:
~
<II
:is
<II
>
o
E
<II
a:
o
"i
o
<0
~ CD
CD a;
E E
~~
III
N
o
i'ii
w
w
en
~
Z
c:
o
g
e
Q.
lP
Cl
:;
en
c: c:
.9.9
'S: 'S:
<II Q)
..J ..J
II)
C\I
o
iii
w
LU
en
C?
"l'
cD
C\I
...
~ ~
-
'2
::>
Cii
Q.
Q)
u
'I:;:
Q.
c:
.9
'S:
m
..J
.c
(,)
.'i
c:~
.9>
'S: u::
~C!l
,...
N
e
o
iii
w
w
en
,...
CD
-i
...
-
'2
::>
Qj
Q.
Q)
(,)
'I:;:
Q.
~
0.
o
U
'8
a:
'C
o 5
~ e
~Cl
g~
CXl
C\I
o
iii
w
w
en
~
-
'2
::>
(j)
Q.
lP
<>
'I:;:
Q.
.c
.!:!
'~
en
m
o
u:
""
o I-ai
~
'" c:
::J Q)
0"0.
enO
Ql
N
o
iii
w
w
en
~
-
'2
::>
Qj
Q.
lP
<>
'C:
Q.
c:
,Q
U
c:
::J
...,
o ~
~ 0
<IIQ.
5-U
en<
o
to)
o
iii
w
w
en
~
Z
'2
::>
Cii
Q.
<II
<>
~
'2
::>
Cii
Q.
Q)
<>
..J'I:;:
..JQ.
o
a:
t
8
)(
S
x
W
..J
u..
..J
<
U
l-
S
o
02
l!!0
<IIU
::J .
g~
...
to)
o
i'ii
w
w
en
m
Z
...
o
,9- 0
5-~
w...
(ij<i5
'O.S!
en ::J
~'8
m:=
g ,-
~,E
~:=
C\I
to)
o
iii
w
w
en
~
.-
'c
::>
(j)
0-
m
<>
'I:;:
0-
'"
:::
ctl
~
CD
-:
,9- ~
~ctl
LUQ.
u; Ca
'0'0
en en
ei
lP3:
~~
~...
~
e
o
iii
w
w
en
m
Z
'c
::>
Qj
0-
m
(,)
'C:
0-
..J
W
Z
0.<
,- 0-
5-a:
~:s
.!20
oen
~I=
'-<
83:
~~
~
o
i'ii
w
w
en
~
-
c
::>
Qj
0-
<II
,2
a:
Agenda Item No. 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 23
It)
o
o
~
0)
~
o
iii
w
w
en
C')
'"
0>
CII
Q.
m
Z
'c
::>
Qj
0-
m
<>
it
~
ll)
ui
Q)
c:
ctl
Q.
(ij
'0
en
(ij
'0
'"
~ ...!.
<Il c:
'O=>
enU")
'2 en
=>=>
~
.0
~I
'"
""
u
Q)
.J:
N
..,
c
<D
Cf)
<II
,~
<5
z
'6
=;:E
31-
cell)
Ec:~
rf.gf"
;.;{!!~
"'&."
;:E<II~
(jC::O
G> l'!
0'1-
Q:
8
'~
<II
-(f)
~~
o III
U CIl
g!
&l~g.
,...U(f)
,,?~r:
:g~~
-0 o.~
iii:!:~
e
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 23
e
It)
8
~
~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii
w w w w w w w w w W w W
w w W w W W W W W W W w
en en en en en en en en en en en en
,.. co
C7! co
.... (\j
.... II)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
z
(fl (fl
- - '2 - - 0.. - - - ,.. - - -
'2 C '2 c: ::E '2 '2 'c: c: '2 '2: 'c:
=> => => => ;:) <( => => => => => => =>
Qj ... ... ... Qj It) ... Qj Qj (jj (jj Qj Qj
Ql Q) Q) Ql
0.. c.. 0.. 0.. 0.. C'! 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. Cl.
III ~ Q) III Cl. 2l g g 2l III Q) Ql Cl)
,!.l ,8 (J IX: (J (J (J (J
d: 'J:: 'C: ::E 'C: 0 'C: 'C: 'c: ;: 'C: 'C: 'C:
c.. 0.. 0.. ~o.. I- 0.. c.. 0.. 0.. Cl)o.. 0.. 0..
.... :5 !
> =>
(\I Cl 0
.... W '- It
(\I IX: '- ~ c:
'- .... W l'll .s Qj a:
.s :> It) l'll :s ~
Cl ..t ~ :ir ....
l'll IX: 0.. ~ :I: ....
Qj Qj i ~ ...I () CJ) IX: <( .t::
c: :a ,~~ 0....1 0 IX: Ig ::?l (J
as 0. 0. g 0. !9
0.. 0.. '5 IX: '5 :5 ,- 0 ~ '5 (\I '1:l '1:l >.
:a C" .~ C" ~() .~ > '5 C" :> Qj g Gi as
(ij w W => w::E .... "" w Gi
~ C!) co ~ 1ii
~ '- l'll '- ...en '-It) 'E 0 > (ij 15 IX:
l'll .... ~ w .!l> l'llC') :a l'll ti'i > lii E Qj E ~
(5 0
=:: '0 > IX: ~en oz ~ co .... 0 2 8 2
=:: J&~ en en en::E i'i5 i'i5 ... en en iii :c
'- <'ll ~ ~ co co
l'll~ f!! ~ E!! as::E c: Q) 0
I~ ,~ :::l Ol Ol f!! co
~.... 0(\1 ...0 c: > ,5 oCl en oCl !9
Cl) (\I .~ .... a~ en :Jl l'll ! It) iU'
ClJC') ~ .... () E~ 'E E en Qj ...
-200 ~ c: c: 0 ~ ~
'2 en ~ ~~ 0 Cl 0 :::l 0 :::l ;::: <5 Gi
=>=> =>=> ~ ::.:: ~~ ::E en ::E en ::E en c.. IX: 0.. ....
~ ,.. ~ G) ~ :; N C') :3 II) ~ .....
l') C') o:t o:t o:t o:t
'<t
Ql
'"
<'lI
0..
.0
...1
III
"'"
(.I
~
N
E
CD
oo
'"
8
"'5
z
n
=:1:
:;'1-
...J<CLO
~5~
ll...~
~~~
Cl 0 ,.
... 0. Ql
""'",:;,
t)eO
Ql III
'o~
a:
'"
8
o~
Gl
cOO
~'tl
c c
o <Il
U'"
~~
_ 0.
oco.
~<'3~
(')<IlC
J, 0 ,12
0.-
o <Il
.. - OJ
ffi~~
en
ell
:;l
(jj
l~
oo 'C:::
~ m
-co
<Il_
~ 2
*~
E ,2
~ E
'-' ~
() ell
:1:'-'
~
o
iii
W
W
en
co
Z
';::
:>
Iii
0-
m
()
'C:::
0-
'"
.!!!
1ij
'~
0.
oo
...
m
lii ~
~ 'C:::
QlO
G) 0
g e
... 8-
'd m
::Een
Q)
.
o
iii
W
W
en
Q:!
z
-
c
:)
Iii
a.
m
()
'I::
0-
VI
Q)
:;l
12 ~
g lI?
~~
Iii g
a; '2
~S
'"' ell
.!!a:
Q) ...
E m
e!
'd e
::Eo.
1&
o
iii
W
W
en
~
-
'2
:>
(jj
0-
m
()
'I::
a.
cj
~
:5
o
a: '0
~I~
Ols;'
~:lI::
0-
Il)
e
o
iii
W
W
en
g
Lri
~
foIt
-
';::
:)
Iii
a.
m
()
'C:
0-
a:
0>
o
gil
CD
o
:I:
d;'
~ll.
:5'-'
Oen
a: en
00
I-::E
OZ
::E'-'
N
It)
o
iii
W
W
en
~
-
'2
:)
CD
0-
Q)
()
'c:
0-
cj
~
:5&'
0<
a: Q)
Olii
I-C!:l
~'-'
M
It)
o
iii
W
W
en
~
-
'2
:::l
Iii
0-
Q)
o
T:
0-
<C
,C!:l
,-,'
zO
_0
:5 ~
0<
a: m
O-
f- '"
0C!:l
::E'-'
:Ii
Cl
iii
w
w
en
co
Z
-
'2
:::l
Cii
0-
Q)
()
'I::
a.
(jj
:;,
c:
<Il
::E
cj't:
z~
-en
:5tl
0'-
a: :;,
O~
I- m
o ,~
:I: ....
In
In
o
iii
W
W
en
o
It)
0)
~
foIt
';::
:::l
Cii
0-
~
&:
.(jj
'-' :;,
Z c:
_ <Il
:5:E
O~
a: 0
0'-
I- e-
O 0
:Eb5
CD
II)
o
iii
W
W
en
o
It)
0)
~
foIt
OE
:::l
Cii
0-
Q)
()
'c:
0-
m
c:
,0
'-'-5.
Z 0
S ,2
0::E
~ ~
f- E
o 0
::E'-'
,..
II)
e
o
iii
W
W
en
o
C\/
r..:
It)
foIt
-
'E
:::l
(jj
a.
Q)
()
'C:
0-
'E
:>
Cii
:::l0-
u: Q)
w,g
aO-
z
iii
Ii
0-
:::l
oo
ui
a:
<C
d~
~o
:5 en
OW
a: a:
00
1-'-'
0'-'
::E'-'
:g
foIt
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 23
II)
o
o
~
~
o
iii
w
w
oo
LO
CD
Cl
<Il
a..
Cl
iii
w
w
en
o
co
~
co
o
o
0)
en
C\/
foIt
-
'E
:)
Cii
0-
Q)
()
d:
0-
:;l
'en
'-' <Il
z-
-s
:5:::l
01-
a: a:
o 0
1-0
o 8
::Eii:
CJ)
III
'"
.1
CI)
""
&l
.s::.
(\j
c
CIl
en
~
'g
Z
..c:
o
=::lE
.31-
e<ltl
llIg~
0..""""
;,:~~
cnO"
::lE e. ~
nee
,~~
0:
III
CD
,!,!
~
CD
000
='0
c: c:
8 :
~~
_a.
oc:a.
<Xl CD ::l
r-.UOO
~ ~.~
o ~-
o 01
i:i <5 ,OlE
i:ii::lE_
e
e
Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl
1i5 1i5 1i5 1i5 1i5 1i5 1i5 1i5 1i5 1i5 iii
w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w
(/) en en (/) en (/) en (/) (/) (/) en
0 0 1B 8 0 ~ 8 ~ ~ g 8
0 In t'!
cxl .0 0 ;i t::i t::i ~ tt t::i en ..0
m 0> "'" (\J r-.
Il) ~ "!. r-. C'l C'l Ul C'l ... ... "l'
.... .... '<i '<i '<i ... ... ,..:
~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1ft
- :t: - - - - - - -
'E C 'E '2 '2 'E 'E '2 'E "2 'c;
::> ::> ::> ::I ::I ::I ::I ::> ::> ::I ::I
~ Qj ... Qj Qj Qj Qj Qj Qi Qj ...
CD CD
0.. c.. a.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0..
Q) CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ell CD Q) ell CD
,g U 0 ,g g 0 I- 0 0
'C 'I: 'I: 'I: 'I: 'C 'C ::> 'C "I:
0.. c.. S2 0.. 0.. 1-0.. 0.. c.. c.. 0.. 0 0.. 0..
... ::I ~ ~
~ 0
co c5 N N
0 ~ Cl :I:
{) '6 {) ::.::
I- < tl :;;: Qj 0 Cl Il)
::I 0 0 ii: (\J
'~ 0 i > 0 u..
0 N '~ a: e.
~ ..c: Ci 0 :I:
co ~ ~ a: "5 8 >
~ < Q) {)
,~ ,g a: :t: 0 a: en (/) 0
:;;: N :: ~ ~ u.. N N 8
{) e,j e,j :I: e,j {) i e,j Ul e,j cj C\j e,j :I: cj :I: cj :I: cj (\J
(\J ~ Ul ~ (/)
~ Z '2 ~ ~ z ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Q - ::> - .:.t - ... g {)
:5 < :5 .:5 I .:5 :s ~ :5 :5 } .:5 :5 :5 :5 0 :5 ~
,2 ::I r-.
(\J 'i 'i (\J ... ~ >
0 > 0 rtl 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 > 0 I- 0 ~ 0 0
1lI C c: a: :5 z
a: 0 a: m a: a: a: a: :E a: :E a: 0 a: a: a: a: 0
f2 'e- f2 ~ ~ ~ f2 5 ~ '~ ~ ~ f2 ... f2 "'" f?
'i u.. 'i u.. u.. ir ir {)
0 0 0 c: 0 :I: 0 0 c 0 :I: J: 0 0 Q. 0 J: 0 J: 0 ::I
~ ~ 'I: 0 E
~ ~ ~ ::> ~ ~ ... ::!: > ::!: ::I ::!: (/) ::!: ~ > ::!: ::I ::!: i!
$ .- N CO) ;! III l8 .... l8 m ~ ....
CD CD co CD co co ....
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 23
It)
8
~
~
co
4D
i'
a..
.c
~I
CD
~
CD
.c:
N
E
Gl
en
'"
~
:::I
o
Z
.c
(,)
3~
...J<lO
~~~
Cl.""N
;.:~?l
ClO"
'"" 0. Gl
""",:>
"&Hi Cl
'0'=
Ii:
en
Q)
(,)
2:
Q)
CS(/)
=-0
c c:
o '"
U en
- Ol
21'='
_ a.
OCa.
~<3~
'? ~ 6
:g~~
.. - C)
~~E
~
C\I
N
I
::.::
on
C\I
u.
'::r
~::>
-8
:)0
oC\l
a: en
OU
f-::!:
0::>
::!:iI
N
....
~
-
.c
::>
Qj
Q..
CD
(,)
'C;
Q..
o
iii
w
w
en
o
o
III
....
'<t
t-:'
N
.c
::.::
on
UN
zu.
-::r
:5::>
OU
a:<
o E
f- 0
0,2
::!: l::
CO)
.....
o
iii
w
w
en
o
o
Lri
o
~-
~
~
-
'c
::>
(jj
Q..
CD
(,)
'C;
ll.
'"
~
::>
~
'5
0-
.E
.E
,Ill
U Ul
~ ~
:)~
~ g
0:5
f- ~
Ou
::!:<(
.
.....
o
iii
w
w
en
o
on
en
-
~
:t::
C
::>
...
CD
ll.
CD
(,)
'C:
a.
'"
~
::>
~
'5
0-
.E
.E
I/)
cj g:
Z E
~~
og
a: 'C;
~~
~g
II)
.....
e
o
iii
w
w
en
2
en
-
~
'c
::>
Qj
Q..
CD
(,)
'C:
a.
'E
o
o
cj Qi
z ;C
_ 0
:)Q.
og
a: 0
0'-
f- e-
o 8
::!:en
CD
.....
o
iii
w
w
en
C')
CD
III
~
~
-
'c
::>
Qi
Q..
CD
(,)
'C;
Q.
CD
:c
nl
o
U ...
~ ~
:)cr
0>
a:C\I
o-
f- CD
o 'E
::!: ...
I::
o
iii
w
w
en
co
C')
..t
C\l
~
-
'c
::>
Qi
Q.
CD
(,)
'C;
Q..
~
52
w
..J
m
<(
U
a:
w
~
o
uo.
zo
-0
:)..J
0<
a:Z
oa:
f-W
of-
::!:~
co
.....
~
o
iii
W
W
en
~
..t
C\I
'c
::>
Qi
Q..
CD
(,)
'C;
Q.
E
~
011
~::!:
:)2
0.0
a: nl
O~
f- ,-
0'0
::!:~
CD
.....
o
iii
w
w
en
o
C')
r-.:
t\I
w
-
'c
::>
(jj
a.
CD
(,)
'C;
Q..
Qi
c:
'E
i:
CD
:;
'0
o
:E
'0
0<
~o
:5:::'
oal
a: ,!:!;
O::E
f-"<t
0-
::E(O
o
co
o
iii
W
W
en
~
~
(0
w
'c
::>
Qi
Q..
CIl
(,)
tl:
S2
c:
o
.Ci)
c:
nl
0-
, x
Ow
~O
:)::::
O~
a: 0
o 'F;
f- g
0(,)
::Een
GO
e
o
ai
W
W
(/)
o
t\I
,...:
co
~
w
.c
::>
(jj
a..
CD
(,)
.C;
a.
i:
5
'ii)
c:
nl
a.
,x
ow
Zo
:)::::
og
a: 0
0'-
f-e-
o 0
::E~
N
CD
o
iii
w
w
en
o
t\I
,...:
co
~
~
-
.c
::>
Cii
a.
Ql
(,)
ct
Agenda Item No. 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 23
lO
8
~
~
o
iii
W
W
(/)
....
Q)
OJ
'"
Cl..
8
N
t\I
"!.
w
'c
::>
Cii
Q.
:; 8
tr;it
C')
CD
Ul
't:
~
::>
Ul
i:
CD
:;
u-g
~::!:
:)2
o~
cro
~I~
o c
::!:oo
~
.Q
...1
~
(,)
Q)
.<:
N
!
'"
,~
(5
Z
~::!!
3....
E~:g
~~C15
~~~
alO"
... a. Q)
""'",:>
(i1:0
Q) I!!
0....
It
'"
Gl
(,)
'~
Q)
'O(J)
'='0
I: I:
8:
- Q)
'" ,-
.=0.
ol:a.
ex>Gl:>
r-O(J)
"?~a
:gl:!::=
...9&
:!2 0 'I:"
i:o::!!_
e
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 23
e
:3
~
~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
iii iii iii iii iii CD iii iii CD iii iii iii
w w w w w UJ UJ U.I UJ UJ W UJ
W W U.I W UJ UJ W U.I UJ U.I W w
en en en en en en en en en en en en
~ 0 0 8 8 8 0 g;J 8 0 ~ 0
~ - 10 <C M
1Ci <ri <ri 1Ci ~ (I') ai <ri 1Ci <<Xi ,...: .0
r- LO u; 0) $ - "It 0) :; CD 0
- C\I r- - ....
fo/) fo/) fo/) fo/) fo/) fo/) fI'} fI'} fI'} fI'} fI'} fI'}
- - - - ;t:: ;t:: :t:: .'!:: ,,!:: -
c 'c 'c 'c C C c: c: c: c: '2: '2:
:J :J :J .:J .:J :J :J :J .:J :J :J :J
Qi Qi l ... Qi Qi Qi Cii ~ Iii Iii Qi
Q)
a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a.
Q) Ql /I) Q) /I) /I) Q) Q) II) Q) Q) <l)
0 0 0 0 ,g 0 ,g (,) 0 .g 0 0
'C 'C 'l: 'C 'C: 'l: 'C 'l: 'l:
a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a.
Qi 0
c: ... N
~ :t:: ~ g
"" '~
:J E l!! CD
.... ~ !. a: 'E 'E
0: g :> en ~ LI. ,~ ~
C 0 J: 'E ,m
0 'E 'E <.52
(j" <.5 Q) <.5 <C cj U (j (j :J (j U
'3 ~ S :t:: 21 u l: U a.:
z 1il ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ::.c:: ~ ... z e ~ ~ '(ij ~ ~ Qi
~~ '8 lXl .2 - III ID X
:5 ::!! ~::.c:: :5 ,5 :5 C :5 0 :5 Q) ~ :t ~ :J ~ ::!! ~ w ~ E
O~ 'Iii ~ :0 0'E .... ~ u ~
o Q) a 8 o III 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 <: a
a::::!! ::!! III o:~ 0:
0: c 0: 0:'8 0: 0: U a: 0 0: 0 a: 0 0: c:
O::J ~ <0 ~::!! 12 1 12 1 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ .Q ~ '8 ~ 'g. 0 'e. ~ l'!!
....:J r- ~ .... ....
.... 1li
00. a 0 au 0 0 0 a o'tl 0 U 0 ~ a 8 0 u
::!!..J ::!! "It ::!!o ::!! .E ::!! E ::!! J: ::!! a: ::!!&! ::!! a:: ::!! ::!! en ::!! <:
~ It) II to IS en i Oi ~ M "It 10
GO CIQ en en en
ex>
Gl
1
.0
...'
Gl
&l
.c
N,
c:
OIl
CI)
VI
Gl
o
''(3
Z
r;
o
'3~
.J<1l)
~~~
Q.,g~
" Ol
..:~
0>8."
~ Ul ~
'01::0
,~~
a:
Ul
~
'i?:
Gl
g~
I:: c:
8:
ca .~
::0..
o I:: a.
~~~
M Ol c:
.baS!
Oom
-0 (5.~
ai~~
e
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 23
e
It)
8
~
~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
iii iii iii iii iii co iii iii iii co co iii
w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w
en en en en (/) (/) en en en en en en
g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Itl co co It) (") "': co
...: C"'i ...: ...: ~ oj r::: l2
C\I co co 0
10 ~ ~ ~ ,... C\I "!. co
~
(fl (fl (fl .... (fl (fl (fl (fl ~
'E - 'E 'E - - - '2 C - 'E
'c; '2 C 'c; 'E 'c;
::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l
(j; ... (j; (j; lD lD lD (j; (j; (j; Qi Qi
m
tl. a.. a.. tl. tl. a.. a.. a.. 0.. 0.. 0.. tl.
Q) Q) Q) Q) B CD OIl ell Q) ell ell <Il
0 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'C: 0: 'C: 'C: 'I:: 'c: 'C: 'I:: 'I:: 'C: 'I:: 'I::
tl. 0.. 0.. tl. tl. 0.. a.. 0.. 0.. 0.. tl.
Qi
c:
lll:: ~
'E 5
aJ en c:
u.. u..
(j; 'E 0
~ 'E &l -e ~ ~
c.. <tI 0 I~
<tI ,al U S u 2 ,aJ U ~ U
cj~ () c: () '5 ~ U ~ (j u ~ ::l U 1"9- U
~ 0 ~ 'iij ~ c: ~ a.. ~ S. z z ~ ~ ...,. ~ a. z ,!!l z
~ 0 ~ -~ - '~ j ~ () - 0 ~~
:3 ~ :3 :3 ~ :3 :3 :) :3 :3 :3 :3 :3
() 0 :3(") ~ 0 lD cd
o~ 0 0 0 0 0 :) 0 c: 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 a. 0 o~
'c; en 0 "t:l "t:l :) ~ :) I
a:~ a: 0 a: :) a: a: a: a: a: en a: a: en a: a: ~
0_ ~ '~ ~ E ~ i ~ ~ ~ '(5 ~ '0 ~ lD ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~
c: c: u.. Qi
f- <Il E "t:l ii5 Q) Q) ~ ~ f-
~ '~ 0 ~ 0 8 0 <5 0 <5 0 <5 0 0 0 I:: 0 0:1:
CXl 0 'E Q) ~C5J
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en ~ en ~ tl. ~ f- ~ ~ lll::
~ ,.. Sl ~ 8 C; N C') ~ It) :8 ,..
GI 0 CI 0 CI
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
0>
Q)
0>
<tI
a.
.a
...1
~
lJ:
r;
N
;:
~
'"
.~
<5
z
'5
3~
-'c(ll)
~~~
Q.",,~
.. III
":1::
010"
::i c. ~
~~O
'o~
d:
,~
Q)
ell)
';'0
c: c:
o III
~ ~
e=
o'E 8::
~~cE
<') III c:
.;, e ,Q
~,g&
~~~
e
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 23
e
8
~
~
a a a a Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl a Cl Cl
co co iii iii iii iii iii iii iii co co iii
w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w UJ UJ W w
en en en en en en en en en en en en
0 lil ~ Ll) 8 8 0 8 Ll)
(7) C\l C\l ~
.,; ~ ~ gj ~ r-: c.; c.; e;;
N CD ~ ....
N .... C\!. co ~ ~ ~
.... .... z
{,/} {,/} {,/} {,/} {,/} {,/} {,/} {,/} {,/}
- - - - - - - - - - -
'2 '2 02 '2 'c '2 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c Oc
::l ::l ;:) ;:) ;:) ::l ::l ::l ;:) ::l ;:) ;:)
Qj Qj Qj G; Qj Qj Iii Qj Iii G; Qj Qj
0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0-
Q) CIl Gl Gl ~ CIl CIl S2 CD CIl ~ Q) CIl CIl
u u u ,g <5 u u u u ,g u ,g
'<: '<: 'C: '<: 'C: 'C: '<: '<: 'C
0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0 0- f 0- 0- 0- 0- 0-
,2 ~
1:1
ell a: ~
a:
15 :;: ;: ~
Ll)
g Ll) := .... Qj ~
~ .... ::.c:: N :r;
J: J: 1:1
c( 0 15 s: ~
~ '5 ~
CD 1:1 ,2 Ll) Ll) J: 1:1
:0 (ij 1:1 N ell N Q) Q) c:
<ll 0 VI ell U. a: u. VI <: ell ....
cj u cj !Xl cj 15 ,a: cj J: cj u. cj :r; cj ::I U 0 U U ~ cj 0-
e 1ii ~1ij ::l :r; ;:) u. ~ c(
Z ad ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- 'E ~ .., - E 8 8 2 u
:5 :5 :5 'E :5 CD :5 :5 0- :5 :5 CD :5 u :5 >- :5 :5 J:
<ll -' ~
0 u ~ oJ1 N C\I a ell ~ 0
0 a:l 0 0 0 en 0 ~ 0 en 0 0 0 j 0 0
a: N a: n; a: a: 0 a: u a: a: u a: a: ts a: a: ii:i a: ~
~ C") 12 c: ~ ~ 12 'e, ~ ::! ~ ~ ::i ~ CD 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ u 0 Z
N '~ ~ t- E 0 en t- t-
O en 0 ~ ~ (5 0 ~ 0 a: 0 u 0 a: 0 0 8 0 u ll) 0 c(
::! 0: ::i ::! ::! ::! a: ::! :i ::! a: ::! 0- ::! ::! ...J :E co ::! !Xl
lD ell Cl ... N CO) ... III co .... CD ell
Cl Cl ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
~
GI
Cl
III
Q.
J:J
~I
~
4:
C\I
~
Q)
en
'"
2!
'E
:2
'fi
=::::!:
.31-
E<(1t)
ca~~
a..",,~
., ca
":1::
00"
"'" a. Q)
"""",:I
g~O
'e'1-
a..
III
Q)
,2
~
Q)
cOO
':::'0
c: c:
o OJ
U '"
a; ,91
.:=1i.
alC:a.
,...c3~
:z ~,~
o~-
o os
-i:j '0 .C)t:
iii:::i:.:::
e
Agenda Item No" 1688
May 10,2005
Page 13 of 23
e
It)
8
~
~
c c c c c c 0 c c c c c
ii5 ii5 ii5 ii5 ii5 ii5 ii5 ii5 ii5 ii5 ii5 ii5
w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w
(f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f)
0 g 0 0 0 0 0
en ,... CXl ~ 0 0
c ..t ~ ~ c c c ~ cO ll'i ci
~ ii5 ~ ii5 ii5 ii5 C\I 10 ~ it;
w w w w ~ M
w w w w
en en (f) (f)
w w w W ffl ffl ffl
:c: - - - -
I:: 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E "2 "2 'E 'E 'E 'E
::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::>
... Qj Qj Qj Qj Qj Qi Qi Qi Q; Qj Q;
Q)
a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. Q)o.. a.. a.. a.. en a..
Q) Q) ~ CD CD Q) Q) :0 Q) Q) Q) Q) I- eI)
0 0 0 0 ,Q 0 (3 ,g 0 0 ~ 0 Z 0
'I:: 'I:: 'I:: 'I:: 'I:: a: 't: 'I:: "I:: 'E:: ::> 1::
a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. ...0.. a.. a.. a.. a..
~ 0 Z c
a.. 'e ::> ...J
C W
g 0
0 0 ...J u:
en w
0 0 0 u. Q) u: en
en
~ eI) u. C J: '3 en en
Iii 'E '3 < ~ ::> '8 ~ ~
E S ~ '8 a:
... I- .E ~
If N C\I ~ 00 Q. ~ a.. a..
a.
M W :I Ol ::> ::>
X ... C\I ~ en I::
"N en z ,a.. en 'Iii U ~ a:
cj cj > UM cj a: cj ::i cj al (,) g o ~ 0 :;) cj 0 cj cj 0
~ ~ 10 ZC\l ~ I- ~ I- Z ~ Z ~ ~ 0 ~ z en z u.
~ -en - )( -a.. J: a: - -
:5 :5 ~ :5~ :5 w :5 w :5 :E :5~ :5'ij :5 .2 :5 g; :5 U :5 (,)
~ ~ Z z !:2 !:2
0 '0 0 o ~ 0 cr 0 cr 0 (,) o ~ o E 0 gj 0 ~ 0 0
l!! I:: C C
a: a: ~ a: 'E a: a:: a: g; a: <( a: 'C: a: 0 a: a: a: u:: a: z a: z
0 (,) f2 0- ~ - 5 f2 !:: 0'::: f2~ f2 0 ~ <( 0 <
b ~ ~ I- .. i::i i::i I- .. i::i b i::i a.. I- a..
0 w o:g 0 0 0 0 ~ o~ 0 Q) 0 c 0 0 X 0 X
~ ~ c ::::!:< ~ < ~ < ~ 0 ~<( ~ 0 ~ < ~ < ::::!: w ~ w
~ ... ~ C") ~ II) U) ,... co en 0 ...
C\I C\I C\I C\I C'l C'l C'l C"II C") M
... ... ... ... ... ... ~ ... ... ... ... ...
::
8-
III
a..
..c
~I
~
:i
.<:
C>l
c
CD
en
m
8
~
.<=
o
3~
ee(ltl
cu~~
a....N
~~'"
0>8."
~rn~
oce
Q) ~
"et-
a..
l/)
8
~
Gl
"200
-'0
c: c:
8:
~~
&lC:e.
,,~~
(')cac:
or, <5 ,2
0--
o ca
.. - 0)
:2 0 'C:
CD~.:
e>
a..
8
~
~
;
u~
~'t::
~
~a;
o c:
~;
~e(
N
C")
...
o
ii5
W
W
en
o
lX!
.....
.....
.....
4ft
-
'c:
::::l
lii
a..
~
'I:
a..
Gl
'3
"8
:::E
g
(,,)
c(
ual
Z ,~
-:::E
~a;
~ '~
0-
l-Q
00
:::Ec(
C")
C")
...
o
ii5
W
W
en
l5
~
4ft
'E
::::l
lii
a..
fl
'c:
a..
N
J:
lI:::
Ll)
N
U.
J:
::::l
a..
u~
~8
~~
a:~
~ "
00
:::E Si
~
...
Cl
iXi
w
w
CJ)
8
oj
~
~
c
0::J
o CD
~';
c ,g
ZC\j 0.
~
Gl
j
Gl
15
(3
'Q)
(,,)""
Z l;;'
~~
o <D
a: ,~
0.=
5"0
:::E-g
II)
C")
...
.
o
ii5
w
w
en
~
"
~
4ft
-
'E
::J
CD
0.
~
'C
0.
,~
t.l Q)
E:::E
r:o
g~
~ ...
'E ~
-u.
E 0
-.:: en
S ,-
GlO
Zc"
lQ
C")
.....
o
ii5
w
w
en
~
-
'c:
::J
...
Gl
0.
Gl
"
'c:
0.
o
E
r:
o
~(,,)
I,~ ~
- E
,~ B
E ~
Gl.<=
Zen
....
C")
...
o
ii5
w
w
en
~
-
'c
::J
lii
0.
Gl
o
'c:
0.
-
'c
::l
alii
co.
'I: <D
c:H:~
...:0.
~
>.
v
~
3:
.."
E
B
,m
" tll
C.l::
- m
r:~
,Q 0
it
'E v
EO
:;:: g
.! 't:
Q) C.
ZCJ)
I
o
iXi
w
w
en
~
o
c:
-.C;tt
a Gl
o:l~
&CU
'C >
-= ~
El-
~ ,~
zo
C>>
C")
...
o
ii5
w
w
(/)
~
2
-
'E
::J
iii
0.
Gl
t.l
'C
0.
g~
-.x
SlXl
,- -
~~
~-a
E>
'- ~
1ii tll
a; 3:
2M
i
...
o
iXi
w
w
(/)
~
-
'c:
::l
...
Q)
0.
eD
"
'I:
0.
o ...
C 0
-. &l
c:_
o Q)
o:l(/)
!a Q)
'E ~
_ III
E>
,- >.
~~
2M
...
....
...
e
Cl
iXi
w
w
en
~
-
'E
::l
iii
0.
Q)
"
'I:
0.
>-
0..
g:Q)
(/),9-
olio.
Gl l5
t.l '-
,- lI)
2: c:
~~
tllW
u: ~
en 5i
~ c
.cc(
S '
oot::
(/)(.0
~
...
Cl
iXi
w
w
en
~
Z
:1::
I:
::l
...
Q)
0.
Q)
t.l
'C
0.
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 23
III
g
~
~
o
ii5
w
w
(/)
~
"'
co
CII
a..
~
Z
-
'E
::::l
iii
0.
Gl
"
'C
0.
b
.....
Q)
-a~
g.g'
en:;:;
oil 5
,~ ~
2: tll
Q) c:
en c
~E
u.e(
'lii E
~ ~
S 'E
o.::!
(f)e(
~
...
.0
_I
~
lil
.c
<'1/
'l:
CD
en
..
,~
(5
z
.s::
o
3~
~~~
~:;;'"
...:-c:cij
08."
::E..~
'0 cO
,~~
a:
..
lS
~
III
o(/)
~"
c c
o III
Uw
~~
_0.
~co.
"'~~
"?.!!! 25
:g~~
-0 '0 .2'
in::!:.!;
i<D
~ c:
en 'E
od:::'
,~ !!!
~ 1ij
Q) I::::
en'C
tll c:
u:!!
_en
~ ,~
:E'E
:l 5
bJ::E
:3
...
CJ
1ii
w
w
en
~
"c
::::l
li;
a..
CD
o
'I::
a..
:>.<D
_ c:
c. 'E
g.~
en~
': g
01-
'~ (!)
Q)...J
en'C
tll c:
- tll
lL_
_en
gJ g
:t ,-
.s;E
~ ~
o 0
en::E
II)
....
...
o
ii'i
w
w
en
~
"2
::::l
...
CD
a..
CD
o
't:
a..
~o
8:~
~ 8
od(/)
<D-
o '"
'~ ~
CD _
en'C
~ 5i
lL_
en
gJ g
:t ,-
51:
5 g
en::E
~
...
o
ii'i
w
w
en
~
-
C
::::l
li;
a..
Q)
o
't:
a..
'2
::::l
li;
a..
8
't:
00..
'~
8
~~
~en
en'
0(5~
,~ g
~I-
~~
~ ~
(jj~
~ ,~
.s::E
~ g
en::E
,..
....
...
e
o
1ii
w
w
en
~
z
~
Q.
g.'E
en 5
od::E
B~
'~ ~
CD_
en Q)
tll'tS
u: e
(jjlXl
Ql'C
:t "0
~~
o 0
en en
~
o
iii
w
w
en
~
-
'2
::::l
li;
a..
Q)
o
't:
a..
:>.
c..
g.'E
en 5
od::E
Q) c.
o 't:
'~ en
CD_
en Q)
","'"
u: ~
(jjlXl
Ql'C
:t '0
J: c:
~~
en en
5il
...
o
ii'i
w
w
en
~
Z
-
'2
::::l
Qj
a..
8
&:
~
~
en
odE
B 5
'~ ::E
CD=
en Q)
~'tS
LJ.. l!!
]j~
:t '0
.s:: c:
'5~
o 0
en en
in
....
o
1ii
w
w
en
~
C
::::l
Qj
a..
Ql
o
'C:
a..
~
8:
~Qj'
~~
Q)...J
0-
'~ <D
CD'tS
~ l!!
u:CXl
(jj~
Q) '"
:to..
~ lii
00
en en
N
II)
...
o
iii
w
w
en
~
'2
::::l
Q)
a..
Q)
o
a:
~
8:
~
en
od
CD
o
'~ (j)
Ql-'"
en ~
~tii
(jj~
Ql '"
:to..
J: ...
:;~
o 0
en en
~
o
1ii
w
w
en
~
'c
::l
Qj
a..
CD
o
't:
a..
:>.
c..
c.
~
en
odE
CD ..
0-
'~ a;
Ql-'"
en ~
tll ...
u:~
_ CD
.. c:
Q) '"
:to..
J: ...
:;~
o 0
en en
~
Cl
iii
w
w
en
~
'E
::l
Q)
a.
ll)
o
't:
a.
e
Ii
~
eno
od....
B Oi
'~ ,~
CD CD
~e:
u: Qj
UiCD
CD::E
:t li;
=-
5 gj
en::E
."
."
....
o
ii'i
w
w
en
~
z
-
'E
::::l
Qj
a..
CD
o
it
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 15 of 23
It)
8
~
CIl
~
o
iIi
w
w
en
M
....
III
o
III
11.
~
'E
::::l
Q)
a..
CD
o
'C:
a..
:>.
c..
c.
~
(/).
od~
a Q;
.~ ,~
Q) ill
ene:
~ ...
LJ.. CD
usa>
CD::E
l Q)
-Sgj
bJ::E
18
....
,Q
...1
III
"'"
&l
.c:
(\I,
E
Q)
en
ell
~
(5
z
15
'5~
..J<(LO
E"C~
~,g~
.. OJ
":1:
Cl 8. "
:::!! '" !
-c:o
:il !!!
'cI-
a:
ell
8
~
o~
~-g
8 :
OJ ,!!l
.="5.
o c: Q,
<Xl Q) :>
,....oen
C'?19r=
:g e.g
".Q ~
:2 0 'E'
al::i:_
-
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 23
8
~
e
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
iIi iIi m m m m m m m m iIi m
UJ w UJ UJ W UJ UJ UJ UJ W W UJ
W W UJ UJ W UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ W w
en en en en en en en en en en en en
Ol It) 8 Ol <") ~ Ol Ol 0 0
<") Ol co ,.... "It ~ ... ...
C'Ii 0 ,...: C'Ii ci ~ C'Ii C"'i c::i -.i ~
co "It ... co It)
~ m
w
w
en
fit t/) t/) fit t/) t/) fit ~ ~ fit
,- ,.... - "" "" ..t:: "" '2 '2 '2 '2 '2
c: c: c: c: c: c: c:
::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l
Gi Gi Gi lii -. -. Gi lii lii lii li; Gi
Gl Q)
a. a. a. a. 0.. a. a. a. a. a. a. 0..
Gl Gl Ql QI Gl Gl Ql Q) ~ 8 III III
'-' '-' '-' ,g '-' ,g '-' '-' '-' '-'
& 'I:: 'I:: 'I:: 'I:: 'I:: 'I:: 'I:: 'I:: 'I::
a. a. UJo. 0.. a. 0.. a. lBo.. a. a. a.
.g -l
< "It
.0 ::t :e- x
III W ~ a: 01
'0 c:
ell U. ~ U. c:
:::l
0 z t::. ~ <Ii .&
.s:: ... ~ III c:
:> B ~ CD ~ 01
0 III 0- CD
'2 QI < :E :c 15 ::::i g
::l c: ::t ()
c: ~ 01 u:
<.!l 0 W 01 I~ w ~
~ (5 u. c: "'t 8 .c
~ Z
Z c: ~ 01 ci. 0 8
0. QI It) .s:: C\i
E III a: 'E "It (j) &l E :I: C\l
It) ~ w <( 01 N III 0- N
C\l 'I:: > a:
() en c: J: 13 en :t:
0 <( QI c: x '5l ::i: ::t
u. i! III en
a: J: ~j J: c: W ~ ,~ 00 iij 8~ ~~
8 ~ 8 j~ ] ~ z ~ e?
::l -< w 1ll~ ~
'" ::l ell '21 I- "'w
'" ell '2 ",Z "'0 ",a: '" ~
Gl al I!!. ~ ~~ ~ ~ Z ~6; ~~ III '2 ~ ;: ~
I- :t: I-::l <( I- ::l
,... GO Ol S 0- N <") C1; It) 18 ,... 110
an III It) lD lD lD lD lD lD
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
..,
III
CI
~
.0
...1
Gl
"'"
a:
.r:;
N
C
Gl
en
Ul
Gl
.9
(5
Z
.c
o
=:::!;
31-
Ee(1t)
"'~~
C1.~~
;,,:i'!ti5
010"
:::!; g. ~
'Uc:O
Gl III
'e~
a.
<fl
8
'~
CIl
'Orn
~'O
c: c:
8:
<ii ,!!1
::::c.
oc:a.
ceCIl:>
....Urn
"?EllS
It) El ,-
?s&
~~~
o
y
c:
c:
o 0
~~
~~
en
CD
....
o
iij
w
w
CIJ
g
<<i
~
'c
::l
lD
0..
<II
,2
It
w
.c
ow
1Il-.J
cnaJ
Ole(
1-0
Cl
,...
....
c
iij
w
w
CIJ
o
-
ci
~
'c
::l
lD
0..
2l
'c:
0..
c
Z
::l
o
a::
Cl
~~
Ole(
1-0
;:.
-
c
iij
w
w
CIJ
~
1:
::l
C6 4;
0.. 0..
~ 2l
"t: -c::
0- 0-
~
-
,Q.
:g
~
Gl
c:
o
.c
0-
8~
l:l.~
Gl c:
I-::l
N
,...
....
e
c
iij
w
w
CIJ
*
N
~
'2
::l
Gl
>
~
Ol
1ij
:::l
Q.
o <Il
~ 2
"'.!!!
Q) c:
1-<
CO)
....
-
o
iij
w
w
CIJ
~
-
c:
::l
(j;
0..
Q)
(,)
'C:
a..
N
:r
::::!'
t!
....
N
co
-
Ul
Ul
I~
1:
u:
.c
'0
o
<'l
o
~
6
~
C')
~f6
lS0
t-LL.
~
....
o
iij
w
w
CIJ
~
;:::.
-
~
-
"c
::l
lii
0-
m
(,)
it
C')
o
N
o
C
:::l
o
::::!'
E
<Il
a::
o
lil 8,
1/)'8
t!c
It)
....
....
c
iij
w
w
en
aJ
Z
"2
::l
(jj
c..
m
o
'C:
0..
~
oc.
o E
1/)<
lll<
1-0..
CD
,...
-
c
iij
W
w
en
~
'c
::l
(jj
0..
Gl
o
't:
0..
o
N
-
::::!'
aJ
0-
~
o
N
....
c
Z
::l
o
a::
Cl
ow
O-.J
UlaJ
Ule(
t!O
J::
-
~
c
iij
W
W
CIJ
~
'c
::l
(jj
D-
Ol
(,)
'C:
0-
...
fl~
N CD
oi ,g
iJ)0-
o
I()
'o:t
~
~
<Il
c:
c:
CD
C
e(
I'g
~
o
....
,.
o
010
lll"'t
l3~
I-::l
~
....
e
c
in
w
w
CIJ
co
N
<'l
10
-
~
-
"c
::l
-
'c
::l
lii
0-
Q)
o
",it
c:
c:
Gl
C
e(
m
E
E
.s::
o
m
N
J:
::E
o
....
'o:t
6
8~
~~
I-::l
~
....
o
iii
w
w
en
o
....
cD
C\I
~
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 23
10
8
~
CD
~
c
iij
W
w
en
~
&
as
0-
Ol
""
oi
....
....
'c
::l
CD
0..
Gl
o
'C:
0-
~
w
~
o
<
a::
aJ
W
C
en
<
z
oZ
ow
gjl-
t!~
c
II)
....
~I
m
....
11
N
~
c8
r/I
,rJ
o
z
.<:
o
'3::!:
-'!;etO
~~~
o..",,~
.. ..
":1::
r i- ~
-c:O
&l !!!
.~t-
0..
r/I
Gl
,!il
~
Gl
o(/)
':''0
c: c:
8:
~:!
~5ig.
,...U(/)
,?"g!l5
~g1il
'0 0 ,OlE
iD::!:_
~
Qi
a:
<(
II)
3;
N
0-
~~
I-en
-
III
-
o
CD
w
w
en
Cl
CD
w
w
en
'c
::J
Ci
0..
CD
o
'C:
0..
'2
::J
Ci
0..
CD
(.)
'C:
~o..
U
Z
..J
fil
ID
~
N
r
~
o
o
,...
6
II)
Qi
r/I
o <tI
11lJ::
r/I~
Q) 0
1-0..
C'I
III
...
o
CD
w
w
en
~
z
-
ID
u..
::!:
9.'0
ill l!!
III ~
~~
l;3
...
o
CD
w
w
en
~
,,!:!
c:
::J
Ci
a.
Q)
(.)
't:
a.
~
-
en
(0
-
<tI
C
c
.l!!
.:i:
C')
fil
-
'2
::J
lii
a.
~
'I::
a.
=-
U
~
r
o
IE
~
l!::
::J
lii
iii
l!!
.(
'0
o IV
&! CD
1Il~
Q) ::J
1-CJ:l
:I
...
o
CD
w
w
en
II)
m
m
tit
e
I-
w
~5
IIlri
~CJ:l
III
III
-
o
CD
w
w
en
~
-
'2
::J
Qj
a.
CD
(.)
'I::
0..
-
c
::J
Cii
a.
Q)
(.)
'C:
....a.
~
c
c
o
u
:&
C!)
a:
Q.
E
'I::
U
Gl
lij
~
u..
~~
~~
l8
...
Cl
CD
w
w
en
Ol
C')
N
~
~
'0
Q)
I::
I::
o
U
Gl
lij
E
Q)
u..
8~
gj~
~a:
,...
III
-
o
in
w
w
en
co
N
~
,to
C
::J
(p
a.
Q)
(.)
'I::
a.
ex)
~
a:
a.
~
a:
u
u
Z
olD
&!W
lll~
I-~
gg
-
o
CD
w
w
en
co
N
~
-
'c
::J
Qj
a.
Q)
(.)
'I::
a.
-
'c
::l
Qj
a.
~ l!l
c: 'I::
~a.
III
Zl
III
2>
CD
.0
u:
CJ:l
'0
o
co;
R
"t
~
0C')
(.)g
l:l'<t
~fr
Q)
III
-
o
CD
w
w
en
LO
Q)
cri
LO
-
tit
~
c
~
U
a.
~
<D
olij
~~
<Dr
I-::l
~
It
o
CD
w
w
en
II)
C')
,..:
tit
-
'2
::l
lii
a.
<D
(.)
'I::
a.
s
,...
l2
Ie
III
Q,
E
<tI
U
g.
~~
CD 0
I-~
-
Q)
...
Cl
CD
w
w
en
:B
N
...
~
'c
::l
~
CD
(.)
'c
a.
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 23
to
o
o
~
~
o
CD
w
w
en
co
...
~
0..
II)
N
-.i
~
-
'2
::J
lii
0..
ell
(.)
'C:
0..
:g,
E
<tI
U
'8
a:
0'0
&! 5
~ e
I-C!)
SI
-
.c
....1
~
~
.<:
C\I
E
CD
en
<II
CD
,2
<5
Z
i3
'3~
-'<(It)
!ijg~
a..<::o'"
;';~M
01 8. "
::i:",!l
g&iO
'O~
a:
III
fl
~
CD
ern
="C
c: c:
o <'II
U '"
g~
~ig-
,...urn
~~ ,~
o~-
o <'II
.. - C)
~~j;
e
Agenda Item No, 16B8
May 10, 2005
Page 19 of 23
e
It)
o
~
'"
~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
co iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii
w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w
en en en en en en C/l C/l en C/l en C/l
It) It) LO ~ Ol ~ Ol 0 0 ll'l
"'" en co Ol '<t (Xl C\I C\I
,-: c> r...: Ol 0 0 N N N co;
co en C\I Ol "'"
~ .... ~
z
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,1:: 'c 'c - 'c ,-
c: 'c 'c 'c c 'c c: 'c 'c
:J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J
lD lD lD ::0 ::0 lD lD lD ::0 Q; Q; G>
ll. ll. a.. ll. a.. a.. ll. ll. ll. ll. Cl.. ll.
ClI Ql CD B CD Ql CD Ql Ql S ClI Q) Ql
,Q (,) 0 0 0 0 0 (,) 0 0 0
It 'C 'c: L: 'C 'C: (f 'C 'C: ,... [t 'C: 'C
ll. Cl.. Cl.. ll. Cl.. ll. Cl.. "'" Cl.. ll.
6
N ll'l III
u.. ~ c
E III :I: ~ c:
:;, :s c: ~ III .... Ql
~ c: C
0 g 0 c: C)
~ 0 N E Z ,... Q) II: c(
- iii $ :I: III Z "'" E as 'C
(5 co 0 ~ e
co ~ ~ co c( ll'l
::) ~ ~ 'C () Ql C) ~
co ('J ~ '<t E II:
II: Ol II: ~
<:) 9 Iii co s: ~ w u.. 0 a.
C)I $: ll. ~ 0 :I: 0 N
c: ~ 8 :J ~ :I:
~ III -' ..!!!
u: c: a: co C\I ClI 0 E "5 a: ~
x '0. () III N :c C/l <( () '<t
~ () c: c :I: III W a: w ,...
I~ w c: ~ () ..!!!
.... x -' Gl -' ~ ;: -' 6
c;, oc( E '<t III <( c(
0 0 :J ~ :;, ~ 0 ,... 0 c o~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 LO
X ~~ <( -'
0 (,)0 0 0 i ~ c: ~() ~ Cl.. 0 ~ 0 ....
! ~ ~ Lt{ I~ '!2l <II CD ;: <II u.. () '" u-
'" <IIu.. <II <II <II Ul '" <II Ul
GlC/l ~ (:?z (:? III Gl Q) c lllz CD 0 (:? :I: (:? Z Gl :I:
l- I-- > I- .... I- <( I-CO I- -' :J IX! I- >
C"l ~ It) :g ,.. ~ Ol 0 ... C'I s a
Ol Ol Ol Ol 0 Cl ~
.... ... .... .... .... .... .... C'i C'i C'\I C'I
....
....
CD
Cl
'"
a..
LI
~I
~
o
CIl
.t:
C\O
c
c?J
'"
,~
(5
z
~~
-'....10
E~o
alo'"
Il.;~
.. al
';1::
Cl 8. ,.
::!E",!!l
0<:0
Gl al
'2~
Il.
'"
B
'~
Gl
000
:'''0
<: a
8",
g!
~ :u %
,...uoo
~ ~.~
oon;
.. - en
~~:E
.
Agenda Item No. 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 23
e
~
~
OJ
.-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
in in in Cii iii iii Cii iii iii iii iii iii
w w w w w w w w w w w w C!.
w w w w w w w w w w w w a
en en en en en en en en en en en en
I() 0 8 ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 i
N N
l"i N oi ~ ;i ;i oi ~ ~ l"i l"i ..:
...,. M M ~ ~ ~
~ C'1 ...,. ...,. ...,. C'1 Lll
.... .... .... .... N N fIi
z ,...
4It 4It 4It 4It 4It 4It 4It 4It 4It 4It 4It tit
- :t:: - - ,t::: - - - - :t:: Ui
'i: I: '2 '2 'i: I: 'i: 'i: c: 'i: I: I:
::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> .-
N
iii iii lii .. iii iii ~ iii cf cf .... lii ~
Q) II)
ll. ll. 0- ll. ll. Il. ll. Il. ll.
Q) Q) B B Ql Gl B fl Gl CD Q) Ql ::I
(J ,g (J (J (J U ,Q ,g e
'I: I '<: 'I: '<: '<: .<: 'I;; '<: '<: It .c
0- 0- ll. 0- ll. ll. ll. 0- ll. 0- 0- ...
Gl .-
> I
~ 0 0 0
LL. 0 0 0 C\l c:i N ~ 0 c
iii ~ C\l 0 0 0 .- C\l .... ...,. :J
.... .... .... 0 x .... X J: C\l S
1:: l\l X X .... X ~ X
al X
CD ::::l I: J: J: X J: J: J: J: ~
0 c: J: ~ ~ X
I() CD <t> N N J: ~ <t>
Cl N 'E M .- .... N X X ~ C'?
a: J: <( ,x ,x ,x .... .x ,...,. .x
cl. ::iE oX .~ .~
N g~ g~ g~ gco g~ g...,. UN (J ~
::!E ...,. J: - co -co -...,. .E ~ - .... - CD -N .Eo .E
ii: ,... ::E ui'- Ji'- -N ui ...,. ui ui .... ui uiO ui
.... ts.!!! '" '"
u c:.. 55 o.!!! U '" 0 N 0 e 0 e g e g l!! g I!!
w to ::::l i ::::l19 ::IS ::I c;; ::I ::::l ::::l ::::l ::::l ::I :::l
.... ...,. ~ ~ [{l ~ [{l ~ 13 ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ UI ~ UI
....J , ~ 0 .2 0
<( o ~ c:s '5
O;:!: 0 ll. al 0- j ll.j 0- " ll. ll. (,) 0- (,) 0- g 0-
~u. U c: ~ ...,. Ql c: c: c: I:
UI Gl LL. "":0- ...,: ll. "":ll. ...,: ll. ...,: W ...,: W ...,: W ...,: W ...,: W
"'- J: () -;en -;0 () 0
CDJ: Gl I: Gl en en '> '> en en
1-::> 1-< I- ::> >ll. > en >0- > en >0- > en ll. en > en
II) 8 ,... :8 g (;) .- N M ..,. II) CD Ci
(;) (;) .- .- .- .- .- .- ....
N N N N N N N N N N N N
CD
...
Ql
0>
o:l
0..
.0
.1
~
&l
.t::
N
'E
lD
U)
co
lD
,~
'0
z
.c
(,)
S~
...l<1t)
~g~
o..;~
.. '"
":1::
0>8."
~",!l
-cO
~ '"
'O~
c:
Ul
B
'~
G>
'000
'='0
c c
8:
g~
oce.
~~~
<') cu C
J, (5.2
o~-
o cu
;;; 'O'O>E
iii~_
e
e
00 8 0 88 o~ 8 8
00 0 00 00 0 0 0
~~ ~ c:i miD c:ic:i mm iD iD iD -8 ori ~
0 <<10 alo r-.
0 ww 0 ww w w
CD Lri C\l w w . It)
ww ww w w w w~
~ en en ~ en en en en en en ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
88 88 88 88 88 00 0 88 0 0
00 0 0 0
g~ g~ c:ic:i lB~ orig g~ :3 ~~ ori 8
coo <<I
0 0 0
cs5 <\i cs5 ri ~ (\I riri ri
~ ~ ~ ~ ~.... ~
~ (o't (o't (o't ~ ~ ~(o't (o't ~ (o't (o't (o't ~~ (o't (o't
~ ~ l.: i!! ~ i!! ~ i!! ~ i!! :s i!! ... i!! iIi 0 ... i!!
:::I iQ' :::I :::I
:::I 0 :::I :::I o :::I o :::I 0 :> 0 :> .. -0 IU; 0 :>
.c 0 .s:::. 0 .s::. 0 c .s:::.O .s:::.O .s:::. 0 .s:::. o :l 0 .s:::. 0
...:J: ,~ I~ :J: 8 ~ :J: .E ..:J: ...:J: ~ :J: ~ :J:,g I'~ ~ i~ :J:
:g 0 8 8 E l:g 8 I~ 8 0 08 0
0 'lii C\l l\l 0 'i OJ 0
1-;:: in C\l 0 in C\l en in C\l I~ 'iii C\l 'lii C\l '@ C\l '@ ~N > 'iii C\l
'~ 0 x I~ 0 x 0 x 8x '0 0 x x X >C c '0 0 X
() () () () () () () ~ a ()
l\l ::!!: Ie:; 'C 14
l!! 'C OJ ~ Il III
I: '0 E 0 III
e 'S Ii Gl
0 c Q) 10 I'e III
1! g l\l 0 E 0 .2
0 ~ .. 0
C Gl '6 :l o -
!l ~ ,2 I~ ~I~ e 0 en III
0 iG c: c: 'c .s:::. ... l!!
1 :t :> 0 III Q) :> 'S S 0 '~
E OJ 'C E E Gl ~ I:::
> III "'i~ 1ii 0 Ul III -0
CP ~ I~ a: Q) III I- ~ ~ I:
a: .9 g '2 :>
II '" III ~ c: E '~ e
Q) :2
Gl U Gl E III OJ 0 Gl (I) 15
::J E '~ u o E E ~ 'i a: en
0 IE .~ 8~ I'~ 'tJ '0 0
::r CD I~ CD 0 c '6
en Q) a: 'e ~ 'ii CD
Q) c: C/J ,~ ~ e
.E CD (I) u: u:::
~ ~ ~ 0 a:
.. E ~s u cO S ~ <Ii
0 ..c .c III ~o e (f) 0 c:
'tJ III :Sit) iil :t -0 en Q) c
u .s:::. Q) E .c
c I: ~ gj 0(::: 1:'0 <Ii 8 C c Q)
CP Q) o c: 0 Q) E
> a:J III ::!!::J: ()Ill () ii: 0 C> III
ai ~ C\l '" "" U) <<I Iii cj ~
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 23
8
~
~
0>
~
<I>
'01
'"
Q.
.0
...1
G>
".
:5
.c
C\I
1::
~
ell
,~
(5
z
.c
~::.
.31-
~< ~
Q.]l'I
:,,:~(i}
0>8."
::. ell ~
&l~Cl
'5"1-
a:
ell
8
~
CIl
'OCIJ
.:0"0
c: t:
o III
~ 8l
III ,-
~c.
o t: C.
<Xl II> "
,..OCIJ
<'l III t:
.;, e ,Q
0016
-0 '0 .~
iXi::...;:
e
e
8 8 88 8 88 al 88 0 88 8
~ 0
ci ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ g cig ~
..., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~...,
0
CD Z II) ~f;f as MN N 0)
~ I'- ~
~
.,. .,. ... ... ... ... tit .,. ~ ~ ~ ... ... ~
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 ~ 8 8 88 88 88 8
:2 ~ ~ 8 LI'i ci ~ ~~ ,..: 8 ~ ~~ ~~ 88 ~
CD 8 ~
0 II) ~ ~ ~ 11)11)
M I'- M I'-M C\i C\I N C\i N 0
~ ~ II) ~ ~
tit .,. ... ... ... ... ... w w ... .,. w ... ... ;~ ... w ~ ...
L: i!! L: i!! L: i!! i.: i1 !! ~ ~ ..io! .c i; ..io! .j; 2: ..io!.j; ~ ..io! .c
:;:) :;:) ::l ::l (,) III CD ~ Q) III 3l c: sf III ~ C
0 :;:) 0 ::l 0 ::l 0 ::l ::l 0 CD 0 ~ c: 0 0
.c 0 .c 0 .c 0 .c 0 + 0 ~~ c: 0
:t: :t: :t: :t: 0 ... ~ :::E <,) .E :E ... 'e ... :::E
~ 8 8 18 J:. III .2 0 .2 .2
8 ~ ~ ~ ~ .2 ...,., ... ... ~ R 0 E ... ...
+ CD .2 8 Q) .2 .2 III ~ !!l .2 .2
'lii N ~ ~ 'lii ~ -::: iii (I) !!ll~ iii CD CD en iii ~i 8 III !!l ~
0 x x x 0 x )( '~ cr Iii cr iii iii (,) cr cr III
(,) (,) (,) (,) 0 cr &! ,!!! cr :::E crlP. 2i cr
III iii f!! cr cr
J '0 III E
~ c: '0 "5
~ 0 c: .2 Q)
.c .c i g III i
~ <,) ..
!!l ::l c: 0
0 ~ ,Q ~ Iz;
CD Q) J:. II: iii III
i c: c:
5 8 ~ Ii ::l 0 III Q)
... ... iij '6 E E
'0 f!! 'C l!! Ii > III ~
Qi c: 0 c: .8 II) ~ a: lli
III .c III a:: B ~ ll!
c: -" !9 -" !9 rJ)
0 ~ 0 I Q) Q) CD III
0 (ij E iij E 0 0 IS E
::l '~
:::: c: ~ 0 'E '~ Q ;r:
Q) 0 ~ :r Q)c
Q) 0 IE CJJ c: Q) 0
,~ '~ .8 '~ :g 1= CD CJJ ~ ;;:;
'C Q) - Q)
'0 ~ E III i!:
I- Q) <( 3"l <( ..lL IS
_CJJ 0 .c '2 1Il e '5 ~
III .ci '0 .ci 'tI g .s::. (I) ~ II) rJ)
> <Ii <Ii c r::: c:'O
~ Qj III '"
l- iI: ~ ~ I-lQ :::E :t: 81ii
C\I M d ~ C\l M ...,
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10, 2005
Page 22 of 23
:g
Cl
~
~
~
CD
Cl
III
Q.
.c
...1
Gl
-"
o
(I)
.c
N,
~
GI
Cf)
'"
~
~
Z
.r:
<>
3~
E~~
<lloc;j
Q..",,~
" <ll
":1::
O>&."
~"'~
oc:O
CI> ~
-e-f-
Q..
'"
QJ
<>
'~
Cll
OCl)
':='0
c: c:
8 :
- QJ
<ll-
0'E8:
~c3bl
C')1llC:
th e ,Q
000;
-c '0 .!2J
m::E~
e
Agenda Item No, 1688
May 10,2005
Page 23 of 23
e
~
~
~
8 8 8 88 8 00 0
000 0 00 Cl 0 Cl 00 0 0 00 Cl
g ~ ~ 00 ~ g 00
CiiCiiCii Cii Ciiai CD ai ai aiai ai ~ ~ ~ ~8 00 ai
w ww w ww w w W <0 WW W CD 00 W
C') N z z crl N crlN
W WW W ww w w w ... ww w ... ... w \
Cf) Cf)(/) (/) (/)(/) en en en (/)(/) en (/)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fI) fI) fI)
800 8 88 8 8 0 0 00 8 8 8 0 00 8 8 88
00 0 0 00 0 00 ~
ggg 0 00 c:i 0 g 0 ~t(j 0 .n .n ~ .0.0 0 .0 ~g r\
LO LOLO 0 0 0 ~ C') r-. <ON ~ C')
...LOLO ... r-.r-. ... ~ ~ LOLl) 0 C') ... C') ...r-. 0 ~
N" c::i ... ..... g ~
.....
-ai 1'\ '"
z
fI) (fl fI) fI) fI) fI) ~ ~ (fl fI) ~fI) ~ fI) fI) ~ (fl ~ fI) (fl (fl (fl '-...-'0;
~ ~.c ~ .i.: .i:: ~ .i.: .i:: 0 ~ .i.:.s ~ ..i<.i:: ~ .i.: .i:: ~ .i.: .i:: ~ ..i<.i:: iJi ~ C;>.;
as CD- as CD 1: al i c: ~ as CD c: III Q)- III Q) c: 11l i c: III Q)-
0 CD c: 0 G) Cl 0 Q) 0 0 Q) c: Cl <Il 0 0 <Il l5 E too
3:~ 3: 0 3: 0 en 3:~ 3:~ 3: 0 3: 0 3::E \
.2 .2 :E .... ~ CD .2 .E .2 ~ .2 ~ .2 ~
.E 0. CD
o 0 .2 .2 .2 .... > .so o 0 .2 .2 .2 .2 .E.e t- ~
Q) CI> Q) .E Gi Iii .Sl CD CD Q) .Sl c:
1i'i ';-; 1i'i ;a > CD'; 1i'i ';D; 1i'i 1i'i
10 CD Q) CD ~ c: "0 11l CI) Q) Q) Ql III Ql CD i '...,..;
a: 1i'i1ij a: 1i'i 1i'i a: 1i'i ~ c: a: caii a: 1i'i1i'i a: 1i'i 1i'i a: 1i'i 1i'i a: 1i'i1i'i
~ a: a: a: a: a:: a: III a: a: a: a: a:: a: a: a: a: a: .;:
~ iii a.. ~~
CD
5 0 'g en 9
0 .2 .s= .s= 1:: ~
0 ~ ~ E
"} ~ (,) e III
en '" s:;
-i: .... e Q) CD a.. 'i:
::::J 5 0 'i c: c: llJ lii
~ :e 0 .... 0 <ll
Q) CD -"
Gi f en "0 "0 ~ "0 '0 lJl
Q) c: Q) c: 0 c: 0 c:
Q - 1 (,) ::::J III III ~ ::c
"2 '~ 0 1St; .c -" .0
~ 2 C .!!! (,) .!!! llJ f1
Iii ! Ql S S Iii
55 I~ Gi .... en 0 0 Iii c: '"
I'~ 'g :: c: ,~ .e
0 c: '0 '5 Q) ,g Q) .~
a: -~ :g 'ii Gi CD (,) (,) '"
CD ii: u:: ~ E -- '5 ~ '~ '5 <( llJ
~ 0 a: 1= ~ '0 '0 g
(,) ai .Sl Iii <U <( III Q) <( iJi
e en ~ c: _en ...J (/) '"
Ci) (ji c: <Il 'i: Q)
'E <> -0 . c: Q) > <Ii .ci "0 <Ii .ci .~ S
0 c Q) E f1 CD ==
() a.. 0 C!l III t- u:: 0
It) (l) ... (\j C')
c;j
CD
0>
<ll
a..
.c
....1
~
<>
CD
.c:
Agenda Item No. 1689
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to award RFP #05-3773, "Annual Contract for Roadway
Contractors" to the following contractors: Bonness, Inc., Better Roads,
Inc., and Quality Enterprises USA, Inc. (estimated annual amount
$1,750,000).
OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board approval for the award of RFP 05-3773 to three (3)
roadway contractors to provide these services for multiple projects without issuing
individual Request for Proposals.
CONSIDERATIONS: The RFP was posted on February 28, 2005. A total of 137
solicitation notices were sent out, and seven (7) packages were requested for this project.
On April 12, 2005, the selection committee met to review the three (3) submittals for the
"Annual Contract for Roadway Contractors." Based upon this review, the committee
recommended the approval of the contracts with the three (3) contractors that provided
submittals, Bonness, Inc" Better Roads, Inc., and Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.
The type of work included in this annual contract includes work required to lengthen or
otherwise modifY left and right turn lanes, modifY median openings, provide intersection
improvements, construct sidewalks, and work of a similar nature to the above.
FISCAL IMPACT: The funding for each work order that is assigned under the
approved contract will come from each using Department.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This award will not have direct growth
management impact, and is consistent with the County's growth management plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners award the Annual
Contract for Roadway Contractors contract to Bonness, Inc" Better Roads, Inc., and
Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., and authorize the Chairman of the Board to sign the
standard, County Attorney approved contract.
Prepared by: Daniel G, Hall, P.E" Senior Project Manager, TECM
,-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No, 1689
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COlJNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16B9
Recommendation to award RFP #05-3i73 'Annual Contract for Roadway Contractors. to
the followlIlg contractors: Banness. Inc., Better Roads, Inc" and: Quality Enlerpnses USA.
Inc (estimated annual amount $1,750,000)
5/10/20059:00.00 AM
Prepared By
ProJt!ct Manager
4!26f200S 9;02:32 AM
Daniel Hall
Date
Smuda Brilhat1
Tnmsportion Services TEeM
Onte
Approved By
Adminis.trative Services.
Purchilsing Agent
Purchasing
(f26/200S 9:18 AM
Mike Hauer
Date
Approved By
Administralivl!' Service.'$.
Acqui'iition Manager
Purchasing
4/26/2005 '9:21 AM
Approved By
Sharon Newman
Transportion Services
At:counting Supervisor
Date
Transportation Administration
4/26/200511:19 AM
O..I(! A. Bathon. P.E.
Date
Approved By
Transporllon S~rvic.es
Prinki,..11 Project Manager
Transportation Engineering and
Construction
4/261200511:31 AM
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General Svc.s. Dirt!"ctor
Date
Approved By
Adlllinisotr;.tive Sf!rvic(!.$
Purl:h,u.ing
4J26/2D05 1:10 PM
Approved By
Rookmin Nauth
Trufl!>portion Service!>
Accounting Technician
Date
Tran!'>portation Adnlini!Otratiofl
.4.12612005 2:45 PM
Principal pf(Jjl~(:t Miina~ll~r
O,de
Approved By
Eugene Calvert
Transportations Selvices
Transportation Engineering llnd
Construclion Manag!!'ment
4/2612005 3:17 PM
Date
Approved By
Noon E. Ff!d.!r. AICP
Transportion Services
Transport<lhol1 Divj~ion Adrninbtrntor
Transportation Services Admin.
4i28/2005 2:'17 PM
Executive Secretary
Date
Approved By
Pdt Lehnhard
Tmn5p[)rt~ltion SerVil:f~S
Tmnsport;~tion Servke!\ Admin
4'Z8lza05 2:2H PM
Administrative Assistant
Date
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
COllnty ManilYu(s Ofhce-
Ofllce- of Managctlllmt & B~ldgel
4IZ6/ZQ05 4:42 PM
Date
Approved By
Moat!.: Isachon
County Manager's Office
Budget Anollvst
Office of Management & Budget
SiZi2005 4:11 PM
M.IIl<l~INn~l\t &. BUII!1f'l Dirf!(:tor
D.atl~
Approved By
Midl;U!1 Smvk()w!;.ki
County Manager's Offk,e
Office of Management & Budget
5i2!2005 5:33 PM
Date
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Cornlnlssioners
County Manager
Counlv Manager's Office
5!Z/Z005 8:02 PM
Agenda Item No, 16C1
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve Work Order UC-023 in the amount of $281,000 to Kyle
Construction Incorporated for the rehabilitation of the potable water distribution system in
the Gulf Harbor area, Project Number 710102.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board approval for a work order to replace the old potable water
distribution system in the Gulf Harbor area.
CONSIDERATIONS:
A. Public Purpose: The potable water distribution system in the Gulf Harbor area was installed in
the 1960's and has experienced a number of system failures. To improve the reliability and increase
the capacity of our potable water distribution system to meet the water demands of our customers,
the system will be replaced. The new system will include watermains that will be sized to allow the
installation of fire hydrants throughout the area which will allow the property owners to realize a
cost savings in homeowner's insurance.
B. Scope: The scope of this project includes the installation of new watermains, fire hydrants, and
service lines for the streets within the Gulf Harbor area, including Venetian Way, Grand Canal
Court, Rainbow Court, and Bellaire Court.
,-
C. Legal. Purchasing. and/or Finance Department Guidance: Purchasing has approved the
approach being utilized in selecting the contractor. The County Attorney's Office will approve the
Work Order prior to the Public Utilities Division Administrator signature. This has been reviewed
with the Clerk's Office and they have no issues with the approach being recommended.
D. Procurement: The Board previously approved contracts with several pre-qualified underground
utilities contractors under RFP 04-3535, Five of the pre-qualified firms were provided the
opportunity to supply quotations on the requested work. Three underground contractors responded
with quotations. On July 19, 2004 sealed quotations were opened for this project. The quotations
received are listed below:
Contractor
Kyle Construction.
Haskins Incorporated.
Mitchell and Stark Construction,
Inc.
Quote
$281,000.00
$325,000.00
$418,500.00
The lowest responsible, responsive quote was received from Kyle Construction Incorporated in the
amount of $281,000. The quote tabulation is attached, Staff has reviewed the quotations and
qualifications ofthe low quoter and has determined that Kyle Construction Incorporated is qualified
and able to perform the required work. Staff's assessment includes that the scope and costs are fair
and reasonable, and therefore recommends award to Kyle Construction Incorporated.
-
Executive Summary
Approve Work Order UC-023
Page 2
Agenda Item No. 16C1
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 6
FISCAL IMPACT:
A. FY 05 Funding: The project is consistent with the FY05 Water Capital Budget approved by the
Board on September 23, 2004. Funds in the amount of $281,000 are available in Project 710102.
The source of funds is Water User Fees.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This project will have no impact on growth
management. The proposed contract is consistent with the 2003 Water Master Plan Update as
adopted by the Board on May 25, 2004 as Agenda Item 10D.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners, as the Ex-officio Governing
Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, approve Work Order UC-023 as issued to Kyle
Construction Incorporated and authorize the Public Utilities Division Administrator to execute.
PREPARED BY: Pamela Libby, Water Distribution Manager
-
Item Number
Item Su mm.ry
M_ting OMe
Agenda Hern No 16C 1
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of {)
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16C1
RF.li:"rn<1ll~nciati"n jn approve Work Ordf1ffi UC.07.3 in ;he .amount (If $~31 ,000 j(.yle
COf1struction Incorporated for the "!,slem reh.ab'lilatiun of the pctabie water sY50tem in the
Gulf Harbor ,lrea, Project N'Jmber 710102
5/10/200590000 AM
Pamela LibbV
Water Oflerution!S Mi\nager
.4tH2IJ0511:27:28 AM
Pn:pared B~'
PubHr. lltlhlies
Date
Wat{!r
Ja'~k P. Curran
Purchasing Agel'lt
D,!t~
Approvd By
Admln!~trallve Sr.rllice~
Purchasing
4!'l1200!. 11:46 AM
Approved By
Pamela LIbby
PUblic: UliIltie5
Wat~I' OpellltlolU; Manager
Date
Water
411:2005 2:18 PM
Water Director
D.1Itf:
Approved By
Paul MaUilIu!:lch
Public Utilities
Wilt!!'r
4/5f2005 7;55 AM
Opefalio"$ mH~lor
Dilte
Approved By
ThoFl'lilS Wldr...
Pubhc Utl\itiel>
Public Utllltics Operations
411\1/20059:25 AM
ACQul$ilioo Manager
D.-Ie
Approved B~'
Mlkt! liitUIH
Administrative Services
Purchitsing
.t!1912005 4:00 PM
PUfchasingtGenClfal SVt::1i Director
Date
Appro\led By
StP.V~ C,uneU
Adminlstwtlve Services
PUfchusillQ
4/22120058:27 AM
Dam
Approved By
James W. Deluny
Public ljtUities
Public UtlHtles Adtninh,tralor
Public Utilifll!s Administration
4J26/200S 1:50 PM
Adnllnl.!ltr..tlve Ass.i$Id.llt
Date
Approved By
OM8 Cc>ortJlflator
County Manager's OfficI!
Omr:e of Manilgemfl'r1t & Budgf!t
4/28/2005 4:-j 1 PM
Senior Man..genlentlBudgel AnalY$t
Date
Approved By
Suun U!lhf:1
County Manan"r's Offic~
Office of Mimanemem & Budget
.12'JrJ005 9:27 AM
M.:JIl;/lgenlf.'l\t & Budget Director
Dale
Appro\'ed By
Michael Srnykowl>ki
Cotlnty ManilliJer',\ Office
Offitf! of Man<lvement 8. Smigel
5/:3r2005 1:15 PM
County Manager
O<lte
Appro\'ed By
Jalnl'!.'!o V. Mudd
Board of Countv
Commis:;IQllen;
County Manage".s Office
5/412U05 e:14 AM
'''ORK ORDER # UC-023
lJNDERGROUND UTILITY CONTRACTING SERVICES
Contract # Dated 3/09/04 Valid Through 3/9/06
Agenda Item No, 16C1
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 6
This \Vork Order is for the t1ndcrgroun{! Contractor's Services. subject to tile lemls and conditions
nflhc Contract rdercnccd dOOVC. for work known as:
Project: Oistrihution Syslem RchabiliHllion - Gulf Harbor Area
The work is specified illtte proposal dated July !9, 2004, which is attached hereio and made part of
,his Work Ordt~r. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the }\,greement rcrcrcncoo above,
\Vork Order ri LC-02] is assigned to Kyle Construction Incorporated and assigned to the following
\"ork,
Scope of Work
Task!: Provide all pans unci labor for the replaccment of' 2" watennain and services along the four
streets that comprise the Gulf Harbor Subdivision in order to bring system up to current Collicr
County Standards,
Schedule (If \Vork: \Vork to be complet<:tl within 120 days Irmn issues Of;\Oliee to Proceed
C ompensa ti on:
In accordance with Itcm 4 of the Agreement. the County will compensate the Finn in accordance
with the lump sum mcthoo as allowed by the Contract Schedule, Contract which is made parr oftne
record of this \:\lurk Order contract is on file at the Purchasing Department for rclerence,
Contractor has been pJ'O\'lrlcd with a copy of the contract at the time of cxc\;ution,
Task l:
Lump Sum
5281,000,00
Torrll fcc
S281,OUO,OO
/~ /J -L) jj
REVIE\VED BY;:__-!!::::.~ ~__
Pamela Lihby. Water DistriuManagcr
a -1"7 ~a S-
Date
APPROVED BY:n,,___
James DeLollv, Administrator Public Utilities Division Date
", rj
W. , .' Jd to"" Jh
ACCEPTFD B'{;_.,~~J~ ' 41'M..
, ana Abrah;(m - Presidcnt
Kyle Construction lm:ollwrated
3__~~l -05
Date
IF OVER $25.000 then must have County Attomey approvaL
Apnroved as to {,)rill and k3al Sllfficlcnc)'
~-r~
rhoma :tImer
Agenda Item No, 16C1
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 6
BID T ADULATION
SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT
GULF PARK AREA
PROJECT NUMBER 710102
Haskins Incorporated
$281,000.00
$325,000.00
Kyle Construction
Mitchell and Stark Company Incorporated
$418,500.00
Agenda Item No, 16C2
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 6
.-.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve Work Order UC-029 in the amount of $246,000 to Kyle
Construction Incorporated for the rehabilitation of the potable water distribution system
serving Heron Avenue in the Naples Park area, Project Number 710102.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board approval for a work order to replace the potable water distribution
system for Heron A venue in the Naples Park area.
CONSIDERATIONS:
A, Public Purpose: The potable water distribution system on Heron A venue was installed in the
1970's and has experienced a number of system failures. To improve the reliability and increase the
capacity of our potable water distribution system to meet the water demands of our customers, the
distribution system should be replaced. The new watermains will be sized to accommodate fire
flows, which allow fire hydrants to be installed along this street. Homeowners in the area will be
able to realize a cost savings in their homeowners insurance due to the installation of the fire
hydrants,
B. Scope: The scope of this project includes the installation of new watermains, fire hydrants, and
service lines for the residential lots located along Heron A venue.
,-
C. Legal. Purchasing. and/or Finance Department Guidance: Purchasing has approved the
approach being utilized in selecting the contractor. The County Attorney's Office will approve the
Work Order prior to the Public Utilities Division Administrator signature. This has been reviewed
with the Clerk's Office and they have no issues with the approach being recommended.
D. Procurement: The Board previously approved contracts with several pre-qualified underground
utilities contractors under RFP 04-3535. Five of the pre-qualified firms were contacted and asked
to provide a quotation for this work. Three underground contractors responded with quotations. On
July 17, 2004 sealed quotations were opened for this project. The quotations received are listed
below:
Contractor
Kyle Construction Incorporated.
Haskins Incorporated,
Mitchell and Stark Construction,
lnc,
Quote
$246,000.00
$250,000.00
$317,900.00
The lowest responsible, responsive quote was received from Kyle Construction Incorporated in the
amount of $246,000. The quote tabulation is attached. Staff has reviewed the quotations and
qualifications of the low quoter and has determined that Kyle Construction Incorporated is qualified
and able to perform the required work, Staff's assessment includes that the scope and costs are fair
and reasonable, and therefore recommends award to Kyle Construction Incorporated,
r-
.-
Executive Summary
Approve Work Order UC-023
Page 2
Agenda Item No, 16C2
May 10,2005
Page 2 of 6
FISCAL IMPACT:
A. FY 05 Funding: The project is consistent with the FY05 Water Capital Budget approved by the
Board on September 23, 2004. Funds in the amount of $246,000 are available in Project 710 I 02.
The source of funds is Water User Fees.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This project will have no impact on growth
management. The proposed contract is consistent with the 2003 Water Master Plan Update as
adopted by the Board on May 25, 2004 as Agenda Item 10D.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners, as the Ex-officio Governing
Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, approves Work Order UC-029 as issued to Kyle
Construction Incorporated and authorizes the Public Utilities Division Administrator to execute.
PREPARED BY: Pamela Libby, Water Distribution Manager
,....-..
,,-.'
Agenda llern No. 16C2
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 6
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
113(;2
r~E\Gom~!wndiltiQ!'llo ,lppmve V'/llrk Or-,ierl; u::-o::W Itlll-le aOlolmt (If $245.000 Kyle
C.uftstrudion InclJlpc.rated forthe system r~h3biHatiofl ufthe potable water systern serving
Herun Aven;.ie 1" the Naples. Park aleB, Project Number 71QHl2
,..e-,
Meeting Date
511 0/2005 9 00 00 AM
Appro\'ed By
.'amel~ li bby
Wate, OpL',atlons. Manager
Oak!
Puhlic Utilities
Wilt!!"r
411120052:.41 PM
Approved By
Paul Manau~cl1
Water O!ret...to,
Oaw
PlIbUr; UtIHtit:s
W.uter
4j512005 6:00 A.M
Approved By
Ja;;.k P_ Curran
Purch-J.!>h1g Agent
Date
Atlminl...t,.,tiv~ Sr.r..,jc~s
PUrcha~in!l
4/5/200S ",48 AM
Approved By
Thomas. WIde$.
Op~,..t1:ons. Director
Dale
Publlt: UlllWe~
Public Utllltle!l Opt!latl:oll1o
4/19/70059:24 A'"
Appro\'ed By
Mike HilllL'r
..\cqulsltion Manager
Dale
A.dmlnlstratl\ie Slelvlces
Purchil!:llng
4/19/20054:26 PM
Approved By
James W. OeLony
Public UtUittes AdmInIstrator
0,,.
PubHc UlllItl!!:!;
Public Utilities A.dtnlni1-tra;tlol'l
(/211l00S 9:03 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Aulstant
D''''
Co-unly Manager's Omce
Omce (.)1 Management & Budget
4i26/2005 4:12 PM
Approved By
Susan Usher
Sen10r ManagemenuBudget Analyst
Date
Gountv Man<lgef's Offk.e
O1fh:e or Manugement & Budget
4123!2005 &:24 PM
Approved By
Mic:l1aet SlnVk.ows.kl
Mallagelnt!ftt & Budget lJIrectof
Date
County Ma.......ocr.s Of1'lr.e
Office of M.lnagem"nt 8. BOd!],,!
.~i,"2005 .1:'17 PM
Approved By
Jame!! V. Mudd
County MlIiflllger
Date
t:Ioard of County
Comrnlsfilone'$
County Manage.'!. Office
5131201)57:13 PM
WORK ORDER # UC-029
UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONTRACTING SERVICES
Contract # Dated 3/09/04 Valid Through 3/9/06
Agenda Item No, 16C2
May 10, 2005
Page 40f 6
This \Vork Order is l()r the Ul1dcl'groul\d Contractor's Services, subject to the ICl1ns and conditions
of the Ctllltl'3Ct refcn:nccd ,loa\<.\ ii)r work known as:
Project: Distribution S~slem Rehabilitation - Beron i\.\'ellUe
The work IS speciHed in the proposal dated July 19, 2004, which IS attached hereto and made part of
this Work Order. In accordanct' with the tcnl1S and conditions of lhe Agreemelll relerenccd above,
Work Ordt:[ j; UC-029 is assigned to Kyk Construction Incorporated and assigned to the following
work,
Scupe ()IWork
Task l: Provide all pans and hlbor IDr tht:: replacement ,)f 2" watcnllain and services along Heron
Avenuc in order ro bring systcm up to current Collier Coumy Standards,
Schedule of \Vork: \V ork to he completcd within 120 days from issues of N01ice to Proceed,
Compensation:
in aect,rdanec with Item -4 of the Agreement, the Coumy will compensate tile Firm in accordance
with the lump sum method ,IS allowed by the Contract Schedule. Contract whieh is made part ofthc
record of this \Vork Order contract is on file at the Purchasing Depal1mcnt for reference,
Contractor has been provided with a copy of the contract at the time or execution.
rusk I;
Lump SUTll
$246,000,00
Toml Fcc
S246,OO(l,OO
/;9 f)
REVIF.\VED B\':~~J::.4
Pamela libhv, \Vater Disuib ti n J\'tanager
, I
a -/9 -0')-
Datc
APPROVED BY:_,
James DeLony. Administrator Public Utilities DiVISIon Date
ACCEPTED BY:
3 ,LL-OS
alla Ahraham - President
Kyle Construction incorporated
Dalc
IF OVER S25.000 then must have Coullty AHomey approv,tl.
Appmvcd as to fonn and lcg,ll sulTlc:cncy:
~-,-lPn~^- r~;----
Thomas p, mer
ASSIstant County AllOme}
Kyle Construction
Haskins Incorporated
Agenda Item No, 16C2
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 6
BID TABULATION
SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT
HERON AVENUE
PROJECT NUMBER 710102
$246,000.00
$250,000.00
$317,900.00
Mitchell and Stark Company Incorporated
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 35
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve release of eight (8) Civil Judgments issued for litter
against Bruce Reed Schwartz deceased, in the amount of $4,000.00. Fiscal
Impact is approximately $148.00 to record the eight (8) Judgments.
OBJECTIVE: To approve and authorize the release of eight (8) Civil Judgments,
issued for litter, against Bruce Reed Schwartz, deceased, in the amount of $4,000,00,
CONSIDERATIONS: The following eight (8) Civil Judgments were filed against
property located at 5221 Coronado Way for Defendant's failure to pay citations that
were issued for litter on this property October and November of 2001: 01-11183COA;
01-11989COA; 01-11990COA; 01-11991COA; 01-12461COA; 01-12462COA; 01-
12463COA; 01-12464COA
Notice has been received from James E, Willis, Attorney at Law, and personal
representative of the deceased, stating the lack of funds in the estate to cover the costs
of the judgments, (Attachment A),
,,,-...,,
FISCAL IMPACT: The recommendation requires payment of a recording fee of $10,00
for the first page and $8,50 for each page thereafter for a total of $148,00 plus clerk
fees, which is to be charged to County Water/Sewer Operating Fund (408),
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management impact
associated with this item.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the release of
eight (8) Civil Judgments against Bruce Reed Schwartz and authorize execution and
recordation in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
PREPARED BY: Lisa Aviles, Revenue Supervisor, Utility Billing and Customer Service
--
Agenda [tem No. 16C3
May 10" 2(l05
Pag!'; 2 ot 35
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONE.RS
Item Number
Item Summary
115(,:>
l-<e';fJnmwndiltI0f110 ,lppl(l\'l~ n~lt~..~;~; ol eight (8) CI\lI' JUdgm'!'it,h Ili'$Ul!d rm liner aHainli~
BI'Uc'l Reed Sr-hW4r'"cZ deceased. ,n the amounl ufS4,OGO 00 Fi",c!':lllrnpact is
i3ppro)':ma!ely $"1413,00 Ie rec;ord Ih~ eight ',8; Judgmer<t..
Meeting Date
511 O/;;;.O[)5 9 OU (JD AM
Approved By
lhornas \fJldes
Ope-rations Director
Date
P\lplic \Jlllitie~
Public IJUlities Opet;1liion$
41'1912005 '!l:17 AM
Approved By
Te't'~a r<(ie~e!1
Revellue Man;ayer
Oute
Puhllc UUmif!s
lJftcs
4;19120059;45 AM
Apprond By
Jdhn A YoftKus.ky
U~lIIty 611hny Director
Date
Public Utilitll!$
uacs
4!HIJ:l:005 ~:20 PM
Approved By
Jet1nlfe' A. Bell)wio
A-,,!;b~l)t County AUorlley
Dare
Count)' Attolney
County Attorney Qtftce
M20IZQ0512:16 PM
Apprond B)'
James W. Delrony
Public UtilIties Admllll'501rlllor
Date
Public Ut!lltln
Public UtlUtle~ Adl'tlilll-stratj~n
4i261200S 1:S2 PM
Approved By
OM!:! Coordmato.
AdmInIstrative Asr.h.tant
Date
Count)' Mallagej'!; 01'l'ict'
Ornee o( Management & Budget
4128/20OS 4:22 PM
Approved By
Randy Greenw.lld
Managell1e:ntiBudget Analyst
Oate
COlJllly Manager's ornl:\!:
Office of Management & Budget
4l:29120QS 9:09 AM
Approved By
Mich.Jel srnykowski
Management & Budget Duec.tor
Dolle
County Mallaget'~ Office
omce Qr Mtlllil'iJernunt & f3udgf'1
4/29/2005 '12:15 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Comrni!i!i.loners
CClunty Manager's, Office
4.130/200512:27 PM
.
Agenda Item No. 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 35
REAL ESTATE
PROBATE
ESTATE PLANNING
JAMES E. WilliS
Attorney at Law
Tel: 239.435,0094
Fax: 239.435.0911
Email: jwillisatty@aol.com
1100 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 409
Naples, Florida 34102
December 17, 2003
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq.
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300
Naples, FL 34104
~--;-""",....;.".,<
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing
2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103
Naples, FL 34104
rm1rn@gu'~n1 .. '
\;"( , : ,
!, ~\ \ DEe L2 <ro3 1 h: '
~'LL -.- \
j
~"-,,,",~-
~...~----,.."",,,~,,
"""."~"""'-----'
In re: Estate of Bruce R. Schwartz
Collier County. Florida v. Bruce Reed Schwartz
Dear Ms. Belpedio & Ms. Reisen:
Enclosed please fmd copies of the following documents concerning the estate of Bruce Reed
Schwartz:
1. Civil Judgment against Bruce Schwartz, Case No.: 01-1 1183-COA;
2. Civil Judgment against Bruce Schwartz, Case No.: Ol-11989-COA;
3. Civil Judgment against Bruce Schwartz, Case No.: 01-1 1990-COA;
4. Civil Judgment against Bruce Schwartz, Case No.: 01-11991-COA;
5. Civil Judgment against Bruce Schwartz, Case No.: 01-12461-COA;
6. Civil Judgment against Bruce Schwartz, Case No.: 01-12462-COA;
7. Civil Judgment against Bruce Schwartz, Case No.: 01-12463-COA;
8. Civil Judgment against Bruce Schwartz, Case No.: Ol-12464-COA;
9. A copy of the death certificate of Bruce Reed Schwartz;
10. Coy of the Order of Probate in the Estate of Bruce Reed Schwartz;
11. Copy of Letters of Administration in the estate of Bruce Reed Schwartz; and
12. Copy of the Inventory filed in the estate of Bruce Reed Schwartz.
Agenda Item No. 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 35
Ms. Belpedio & Ms. Reisen
December 17, 2003
Page 2 of2
Mr. Schwartz was a long time sufferer of severe Multiple Sclerosis. He had little money - not
enough to live on decently or pay for doctors, much less other obligations. Mr. Schwartz is
survived by his brother Jerry Schwartz who resides in New Jersey.
The County can file a claim, but as they can see from the Inventory there is no virtually no money.
However, I suspect that Jerry Schwartz might pay a compromised settlement of these debts in honor
of his brother. They were very close.
Enclosures
,,""',,-
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10,2005
Page 5 of 35
L"J THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRI1\UNAL DIVISION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Plaintiff,
Case No,: 01-11989 COA
v.
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
/
JUDGE
CIVIL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED A1'ID DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the Stale
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue.
DONE AJ."ID ORDERED in Chambers on this -...L1:L day of ~a-c ~
,2003,
S/ EUGENE C ~ TURNER
Collier County Court Judge
CONrORMED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq" 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E, Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite D100, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 35
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
COLLIER 90UNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Case No.: 01-11990 COA
Plaintiff,
v,
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant,
I
JUDGE
CIVIL .JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's. failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREB Y ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this -&- day of ~
,2003.
SI EOOENEC. TURNER
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORMED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq., 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DIOO,Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No. 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 35
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDiCIAL CIRCUIT
IN A.l'ID FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
COLLIER COUNtY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Case No.: 01-11991 COA
Plaintiff,
v.
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
/
JUDGE
CIVIL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida. recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this ~ day of ~
,2003.
SI EUGENE C. TURNER
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORMED COPlES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq., 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DlOO, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No. 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 35
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Case No.: 01-11183 COA
Plaintiff,
v.
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
I
JUDGE
CIVIL .JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
, ,
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue,
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this -/IL. day of ~
,2003.
51 EUGENE C I TURNER
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORt\1ED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq., 2800 Notth Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DIDO, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No. 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 35
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWEl\iTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COlThTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Case No.: 01-12461 COA
Plaintiff,
v.
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
/
JUDGE
CIVIL .JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue,
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this ~ day of ~ /(:1~
,2003.
SI EUGENEC I TURN...ri
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORMED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq., 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E, Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DlOO, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 35
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIEl'Ii JUDICIAL CIRCmT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
COLLlER <:OUNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Case No.: 01-12462 COA
Plaintiff,
v,
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant,
/
JUDGE
CIVIL .JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in tbis cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this 10 day of "'-u_~
, 2003.
S/EUGENE C A TURNLd1
Collier County Court Judge
CONFO&\1ED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq., 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite 0100, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 35
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCl:JIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
COLLIER <;:OUNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Case No.: 01-12463 COA
Plaintiff,
v.
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
/
JUDGE
CIVIL .JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwanz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this II day of ~
,2003,
$/ EUGENE C Q TURN.a
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORMED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Be1pedio, Esq., 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DIOO, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 35
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH' JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
COLLIER (:OUNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Case No.: 01-12464 COA
Plaintiff,
v.
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
I
mDGE
CIVIL .JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
r'
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred doHan;
($500,00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue,
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this ~ day of ~
,2003,
Si EUGENE C i TURN~rl
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORMED COPIES TO:
-
Jennifer A Belpedio, Esq" 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz clo James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DIDO, Naples,
Florida 34102
"-
I
~.
,,.,-,;...........
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 35
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA PROBATE DIVISION
IN RE: ESTATE OF
BRUCE R. SCHWARTZ
File No.:
(21 -q~3~c:r t';2 ,tt'!,);.
Division: Probate
C)
;:::J
~-
.J
cc
-< ('") ,.'\_1
\ 1 -:"'.>>
f"':'i
\ ;')
....~
, \'oJ
I -. (:;"1
\ ;"'-,. ~.
1 f="
\ ,~-~ ........
:s s
-<
0 VI
h
Deceased.
~cg~~
;
.....i""M
~...~,.jl~1
..-< '-)
-~'l
ORDER ESTABLISHING AND PROBATING
LOST OR DESTROYED WILL
AND APPOINTING PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE
20
::::::1-1
o
:P
The petition of JAMES E. WILLIS requesting an order establishing and probating the last
will of BRUCE R. SCHWARTZ, the original of which was either lost or destroyed, having been
considered by this court, and the court finding that:
1. BRUCE R. SCHWARTZ dies on June 2, 2003, and at the time of death was
domiciled in COLLIER County, Florida..
2. The decedent executed his last will on March 3, 1992 and this will remained in full
force and effect without being intentionally destroyed or otherwise revoked by the decedent.
3. The terms and provisions of the original will are established to be as follows:,
(Please see attached).
4. STANLEY SCHWARTZ and CATHRYN SCHWARTZ, the intestate heirs, who but
for that will, would be entitled to the property devised by it, have filed their Waiver, Joinder and
Consents with the Court and have joined in and consented to the probate of the copy of the
Decedent's Will dated March 3, 1992 as the Last Will and Testament of the Decedent.
5. Clear and distinct proof of the execution, attestation, and contents of the will has
been made by Cannen Willis and James E. Willis, two disinterested witnesses. It therefore is
ADJUDGED that the will dated March 3, 1992 and attested by Cannen Willis and James E.
Willis is established as recited above and is admitted to probate as the Decedent's Last Will and
Testament.
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 15 of 35
.ADJUDGED that JAMES E. WILLIS is appointed personal representative of the estate of
the decedent, and that upon taking the prescribed ~a;) ~ling designation of resident agent and .
acceptance, and entering into bond in the sum of &./1., 11 L/) , letters of administration shall
be issued.
ORDERED on
,2003.
Circuit Judge
?,.., ~-.
;.. D /,"1-,
....:...;..1
by ril,,,,,,, r',
.~+, i_~
CircUI!' "-'.J
.JuQge
Agenda Item No. 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 35
Division: Probate
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA PROBATE DIVISION
INRE: ESTATEOF
BRUCE R. SCHWARTZ
File No.:
d'3 ..p~3 ...eP-ttl~-1I J /I
Deceased.
LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION
(single personal representative)
~(Q)~W
TO ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
WHEREAS, BRUCE R. SCHWARTZ, a resident of COLLIER County, Florida, died on
June 2,2003, owning assets in the State of Florida, and
WHEREAS, JAMES E. WILLIS has been appointed personal representative of the estate of
the decedent and has performed all acts prerequisite to issuance of Letters of Administration in the
estate,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, the undersigned circuit judge, declare JAMES E. WILLIS duly
qualified under the laws of the State of Florida to act as personal representative of the estate of
BRUCE R. SCHWARTZ, deceased, with full power to administer the estate according to law; to
ask, demand, sue for, recover and receive the property of the decedent; to pay the debts of the
decedent as far as the assets of the estate will pennit and the law directs; and to make distribution
of the estate according to law.
ORDERED on
, 2003.
..ti
:-10:::
We::
",,",
c:: -~
--~..
~. .:::)
-..-. -
l.,.f)
(".....! ,--,
S:~ ,
'.........
c;:;.:... 1..cJ
.-J
'''':l
~
C
I
I
\
'1~,V /-~{) .~,
r, ','
twitc; I;!
Circuit Judge "
;-
"'"
--
!;.-
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 35
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA PROBA TE DIVISION
INRE: ESTATEOF
File No.:
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ ,,03-963-CO-02-HDB
Division: Probate
Deceased.
INVENTORY
The undersigned personal representative of the estate ofBruce Reed Schwartz, deceased, who
died June 2, 2003, and whose social security nwnber is 146-40-9652, submits this inventory of all
the property of the estate that has come into the hands, possession, control, or knowledge of this
personal representative:
REAL EST ATE IN FLORIDA - Exempt (protected) Homestead:
Description
NONE
REAL ESTATE IN FLORIDA - Non-Exempt Homestead:
Description
Estimated Fair Market Value
NONE
Total Non-Exempt Homestead Real Estate in Florida
$0.00
(Whether homestead property is exempt .from the claims of creditors, whether it is
properly devised and whether it is a probate asset may have to be determined by
appropriate proceedings.)
1
..
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 35
OTHER REAL ESTATE IN FLORIDA:
Description
Estimated Fair Market Value
NONE
Total Other Real Estate in Florida
$0.00
$0.00
Total Real Estate in Florida - Except Exempt (Protected) Homestead
PERSONAL PROPERTY WHEREVER LOCATED:
Description
Estimated Fair Market Value
Proceeds from Wachovia Checking Account
$433.67
Clothing & Personal Effects
$500.00
Total of Personal Property -- Wherever Located
$933.67
TOTAL OF ALL PERSONAL PROPERTY AND FLORIDA REAL ESTATE
(Except exempt (protected) homestead)
$933.67
No real estate located outside the State of Florida, of which the personal representative is aware, was
owned by the decedent
NOTICE: Each residuary beneficiary in a testate estate or heir in an intestate estate has the right
to request a written explanation of how the inventory value of any asset was tktermined, including
whether the personal representative obtained an independent appraisal for that asset and from
whom the appraisal was obtained Any other beneficiary may request this information regarding
all assets distributed to or proposed to be distributed to that beneficiary.
2
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 19 of 35
Under penalties of peIjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing, and the facts alleged are
true to the best of my knowledge and belief
Signed on Oc.-\-dC~..fL Z 1...
,"
, 2003./ ,/"
/), /, c? /J, '
,', // //
Y:"i-tt/;Zud;c/
;lJ'
James E. Willis
i
" ~,:/'/'
, /', i /
i / / ,/
( h / Ili l
/-;(jt/vLl,? (iA..,/,/'
James E. Willis \"
Attomey for Personal Representative
Flo~da Bar No. 149756
1160 Fifth Avenue South
Suite 409
Naples, Florida 34102
Telephone: (239) 435-0094
..
,
'I
1/
Personal Representative
CERTIFlCATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Inventory of the Estate
of Bruce Reed Schwartz, deceased, was served upon the Florida Department of Revenue, Attn:
Compliance Support, 5050 W. Tennessee Street, Tallahassee, FL 32399-0100 by U.S. Mail, postage
prepaid, on this 21.. day of October, 2003.
,,' ,/1 /"/~~ /r
/ ,/' ~~/I' ._.:,"
I /1 / / /
V'vZ/lZl~/i' ", ,I" 'Z
James E. Willis
Attorney for Personal Representative
.Florida BarNo. 149756
\.../
llOO Fifth Avenue South
Suite 409
Naples, Florida 34102
Telephone: (239) 435-0094
""
.)
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 35
RELEASE OF CIVIL JUDGMENT
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that for good cause shown, the Civil Judgment rendered in Case
No. 01-11183COA, in the County Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier
County, Florida, Criminal Division, in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00), attached
hereto as Exhibit "A," is hereby released in full.
The undersigned is authorized to, and does hereby, release this civil judgment a<; to the
decedent, BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ, his heirs and assigns, and consents to this civil
judgment being discharged of record,
Dated this
day of
, 2005
A TrEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
~~
JENN, ER A, BE~IO
Assistant County At ey
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 35
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TIVEl'l1'IETH JUDICIAL CIRCmT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
COUJER <:OUNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Case No.: 01-11183 COA
Plaintiff,
v,
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
I
JUDGE
CIVIL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED ANn DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500,00) [hat shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue.
DOI\TE A.ND ORDERED in Chambers on this --1.tL day of ~
,2003.
'~I EUGENE C T'IDlJ"-!R'
~ , unnt'
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORMED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq" 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, F10rida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz cia James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DlOO, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 22 of 35
RELEASEOFCnnLJUDGMENT
TH1S IS TO CERTIFY that for good cause shown, the Civil Judgment rendered in Case
No. Ol-11989COA, in the County Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier
County, Florida, Criminal Division, in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00), attached
hereto as Exhibit "A," is hereby released in full.
The undersigned is authorized to, and does hereby, release this civil judgment as to the
decedent, BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ, his heirs and assigns, and consents to this civil
judgment being discharged of record.
Dated this
day of
,2005
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Deputy Clerk
By:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
By:
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
~~~
JENNIFER A. BELPEDI~
Assistant County Attorney
-
,.;ij';,;'",<"x.,,.','_.'.,,'-.
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 23 of 35
IN THE C01JNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL ,CIRCUIT
Ll\l AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMlNAL DIVISION
COLLlER ~OUNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 01-11989 COA
v,
BRUCE REED SCHW" ARTZ,
Defendant.
I
JUDGE
CIVIL .TUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision 'of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied fOT which let execution issue,
DONE A1'ID ORDERED in Chambers on this -2tL day of ffi~~
,2003.
51 EUGENE C; TURNER
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORMED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq" 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Broce Reed Schwartz cia James E. Willis, Trostee, 501 Good1ette Road., N, Suite D100, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No. 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 24 of 35
RELEASE OF CIVIL JUDGMENT
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that for good cause shown, the Civil Judgment rendered in Case
No. Ol-11990COA, in the County Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier
County, Florida, Criminal Division, in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00), attached
hereto as Exhibit "A," is hereby released infull.
The undersigned is authorized to, and does hereby, release this civil judgment as to the
decedent, BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ, his heirs and assigns, and consents to this civil
judgment being discharged of record.
Dated this
day of
,2005
A'ITEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
FRED W, COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
~~~o~
Assistant County torney
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 25 of 35
LN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIlVllNAL DIVISION
COLLIER COlJNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 01-11990 COA
v,
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
/
JUDGE
CIVil.. .JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREB Y ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this ~ day of ~
,2003.
S/EUGENE C. TURNER
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORMED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq., 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DIDO, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No. 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 26 of 35
RELEASEOFCnnLJUDGMENT
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that for good cause shown, the Civil Judgment rendered in Case
No. Ol-11991COA, in the County Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier
County, Florida, Criminal Division, in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00), attached
hereto as Exhibit "A," is hereby relea~ed in full.
The undersigned is authorized to, and does hereby, release this civil judgment as to the
decedent, BRUCE REED SCHW ARTZ, his heirs and assigns, and consents to this civil
judgment being discharged of record.
Dated this
day of
,2005
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legaJ sufficiency:
\Ct ~~~~~
JENNlFER A. BEl.: EDIO
Assistant County Attorney
,.::,j",""
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 27 of 35
Ii\! THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN A.N'D FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIlVlINAL nfVlSION
COllIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 01-11991 COA
v,
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
/
JUDGE
CIVIL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
,penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED J\ND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COtJNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred Jollars
($500,00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this -LL day of ~
,2003,
~I EIIi'.-J:NE C TURN" ;, ~'R'7
~ UQI; ~. " ,t.,'
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORlv1ED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esg" 2800 Nonh Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DlOO, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 28 of 35
".-
RELEASE OF CIVIL JUDGMENT
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that for good cause shown, the Civil Judgment rendered in Case
No. 01-12461COA, in the County Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier
County, Florida, Criminal Division, in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00), attached
hereto as Exhibit "A," is hereby released in full.
The undersigned is authorized to, and does hereby, release this civil judgment as to the
decedent, BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ, his heirs and assigns, and consents to this civil
judgment being discharged of record.
Dated this
day of
,2005
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
'~
JEN~ A. P~O
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 29 of 35
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCl.JIT
LN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
COLLIER 90UNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Plaintiff,
Case No,: 01-12461 COA
v,
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
I
JUDGE
CIVIL .roDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in tIns cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJlJDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500,00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this -'1L day of ~ ;~~~
,2003,
SI EUGENE C Q TURN~R
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORMED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A Belpedio, Esq., 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DIOO, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No. 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 30 of 35
RELEASE OF CIVIL JUDGMENT
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that for good cause shown, the Civil Judgment rendered in Case
No. Ol-12462COA, in the County Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier
County, Florida, Criminal Division, in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00), attached
hereto as Exhibit "A," is hereby released in full.
The undersigned is authorized to, and does hereby, release this civil judgment as to the
decedent, BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ, his heirs and assigns, and consents to this civil
judgment being discharged of record.
Dated this
day of
,2005
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
~tli . ~
JENN RA.~
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 31 of 35
L~ THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH Jl)l)ICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRI1\IllNAL DIVISION
COllJER COUNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of F1orida,
Plain tiff,
Case No.: 01-12462 COA
v.
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
/
JUDGE
CIVIL .TUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue,
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this It' day of iJl.u#'~
,2003.
SI EUGENE C c TURNL.B
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORMED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq., 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive: Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DIOO, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 32 of 35
RELEASE OF CIVll.. JUDGMENT
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that for good cause shown, the Civil Judgment rendered in Case
No. 01-12463COA, in the County Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier
County, Florida, Criminal Division, in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500,00), attached
hereto as Exhibit "A," is hereby released in full.
The undersigned is authorized to, and does hereby, release this civil judgment as to the
decedent, BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ, his heirs and assigns, and consents to this civil
judgment being discharged of record.
Dated this
day of
,2005
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
JEN~~~~~~
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 33 of 35
L1\f THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN ANn FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
COLLffiR~O~,aORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Case No.: 01-12463 COA
Plaintiff,
v.
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
/
JUDGE
CIVIL .JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this /P day of ~
,2003.
/*'1 E UGE HE C TURN ',~
~ a' ' ~jji1
Collier County Court Judge
CO~'FORMED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A Belpedio, Esq., 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples. Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive~ Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz cia James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 Goodlette Road, N, Suite DI00, Naples,
Florida 34102
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 34 of 35
RELEASE OF CIVIL JUDGMENT
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that for good cause shown, the Civil Judgment rendered in Case
No. 01-12464, in the County Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County,
Florida, Criminal Division, in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00), attached hereto as
Exhibit "A," is hereby released in full.
The undersigned is authorized to, and does hereby, release this civil judgment as to the
decedent, BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ, his heirs and assigns, and consents to this civil
judgment being discharged of record.
Dated this
day of
,2005
ATIEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
\c> R~<~
JENNlFER A. B EDIO
Assistant County Attorney
l
Agenda Item No, 16C3
May 10, 2005
Page 35 of 35
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE TWENTIETH' .JUDICLt\.L CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COilll''TY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
COLLIER \=OUNTY, FLORIDA
a political subdivision of the State
of Florida,
Plaintiff,
Case No,: 01-12464 COA
v,
BRUCE REED SCHWARTZ,
Defendant.
/
JUDGE
CIVIL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Citation entered in this cause and the Defendant's failure to pay the civil
penalty or to request a court date within the time period prescribed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJtTDGED AND DECREED,
That the Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, recover from the Defendant, Bruce Reed Schwartz, the sum of five hundred dollars
($500.00) that shall bear interest at 6% per year until satisfied for which let execution issue.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this ~ day of ~~
,2003,
Si EUGENE C a TURN~~
Collier County Court Judge
CONFORMED COPIES TO:
Jennifer A. Belpedio, Esq" 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34104
Teresa Riesen, Utility Billing, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive; Suite 103, Naples, Florida 34104
Bruce Reed Schwartz c/o James E. Willis, Trustee, 501 GoodIette Road, N, Suite D100, Naples,
Florida 34102
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item No, 16C4
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 3
Recommendation to award Contract 05-3783 "Fixed Term Geographic Information
Systems Services" to five (5) firms.
OBJECTIVE: To receive the Board's approval for award of professional services contracts to
five firms in order to enable staff to procure Geographic Information Systems services in an
efficient and cost-effective manner. Geographic Information Systems Services is an essential
component for all public infrastructures and planning systems. The public benefit ofthis contract
is the continuing development and implementation of an agency-wide Geographic Information
System. The public purpose of this Contract is to negotiate agreements and procure Geographic
Information System Services. This replaces contract 02-3313 dated April 23rd, 2002 that
provided the funding for establishing the hardware foundation and the initial layers ofthe agency
Geographic Information System. The new contract will provide for further enhancements of
existing agency data and the collection of further data to be used to track and locate assets,
comply with state and federal mandated reporting/maintenance requirements, and provide the
public with increased data about their county.
CONSIDERATIONS: Request for Proposal (RFP) 05-3783 was issued in accordance with
Florida State Statute 287.055, Consultant Competitive Negotiation Act, and publicly advertised
on February 4, 2005, Notices were sent to 175 firms with 73 vendors requesting fun packages.
Thirteen responses were received by the due date of March 4, 2005 and all 13 were determined
"responsive". A Selection Committee Meeting, composed of representatives from Information
Technology GIS, Community Development and Environmental Services, Transportation and
Public Utilities, was held on March 31, 2005. The services to be provided will include, but not
be limited to, providing GeoDatabase design, development, and maintenance, Application
development and design, Model ing development and support, Data collection and development,
Public access to GIS data, Training and support., After review, ranking and discussion, by
consensus of the members, the following 5 firms were recommended for contract negotiations
and subsequent award based upon the firms' areas of expertise i.e, Transportation; Utilities; Land
development; Survey; or Applications development:
Wilson and Miller
CH2M Hill
PBS & J
Ayers and Assocs
Malcolm Pirnie
FISCAL IMPACT: The funding for each work order that is assigned under the approved
contracts will come from each user Division, Individual work order agreements are to be
consistent with current Budget requirements. This executive summary has been reviewed and
approved by the Finance Department of the Clerk of Courts.
"....-.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: While these contracts have no direct growth
management impact, they are consistent with the County's long-term ability to monitor and plan
for growth.
,-.--,
,-'
,~.
Award Contracts 05-3681
Page 2
Agenda Item No, 16C4
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 3
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners award professional services
agreements under 05-3783 to the five firms listed and authorize the Chairman of the Board to
execute the standard Professional Services Agreements with each firm subsequent to County
Attorney approval.
PREPARED BY: Trevor P. Trinkaus, GIS Project Manager, PUED
Agend3 Item No 16Cil
May 10, f.'005
Page 3 or 3
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY cOMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16C4
Rec:.omll1endation to award c.untract G!:.i-37B3 "FI'I(ed Term .'~';eogn;pnlc Information
Sys1ems Ser~lces' Ie. fiVe (S1 firms
Meeting O.te
5i":O:;W05 !JOOOO AM
Approved By
Thomas Wides
Operations Director
Dale
Public lItllitiil':5
Public Uti!1tie.1 Operi.ltlons
41:!6/;.?OOS l);S:j AM
Apprond By
Mike Hauer
ACqLli:!i.ltlol1 tAJ,llagel
Date
Administr.lti\'(! Service!.
Purchasing
4r.l612005 J: 05 PM
Approved By
Steve C.Hnell
PUfGh.millgIGr.neral Sv(:s Olrel:tor
Outr.
Adnllnl~ttati.".e Ser.'lce~
Purchasing
4i261:l00S 3:55 PM
Approved By
Roy B. Anor.rson, p,r:..
Publk: U1i1ltil!s. El"Igil"lP.r.rll"lQ Direr-tor
Dale
Public UtIHtie10
Public Utilitie& Efll1in~rifl~
4!:l6I2tJOS 5:10 PM
Approved By
J,lmr.s W. Del.ony
Ptlhllc lJtWtiel; AtJrnlnl:w,llr:H
Oatr.
Publlc Utilities
Public Utllltle!o Admini'lotraUon
4tH ri006 9 :09 AM
Apprond By
OMB Cootdinator
Admini':11mttvc A~,'loistanl
Datlr
County Manager's OtfH:e
Office of M.anagement & Budget
4f2&12005 4:24 PM
Approved By
Randy Grj!'fln.......ld
Matl<1g~mentlBudQet Analyst
Date
County M.lInagp.f''f, Office
Of nee flof M..Mgetnent lie audg~l
4r29!2005 9:10 AM
Approved By
Mh::hilel Smykow!l.kl
Manag~lnent & Budget Director
Date
County Manager'!> OffiCI(!
OffiCI! of Managemllflt & BlldQct
4/:!9/:l005 1:l:09 PM
Approved By
Jam~V"'Llcld
County Manager
D;lIf:
Board of County
Gom,"j~'\ojonef$
County f1'hln.10f!"!; Oftke:
4!30i200512:59 PM
Agenda Item No. 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 20
,.""""h
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve Work Order UC-I04 under Contract 04-3535 in the amount
of $248,884.75 to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., for construction of the Collier County and
City of Naples Water System Interconnect at Davis Blvd., Project 70040.
OBJECTIVE: The public purpose is to allow Collier County and the City of Naples to supply
water to each other in the event that an emergency limits the ability of either entity to produce
water for their own customers. The scope of the project includes the construction of two meter
and valve assemblies and the piping needed to connect the assemblies to existing pipelines. One
meter and valve assembly will allow water to flow from the County to the City; the other will
allow water to flow from the City to the County.
CONSIDERATIONS: On September 14, 1994, the Board of County Commissioners and the
Naples City Council, meeting in joint session, approved the "Interlocal Agreement for
Emergency Water Interconnect." A copy of the (nterlocal Agreement is attached. This project is
included in the 2003 Water Master Plan Update adopted by the Board on May 25, 2004 as
Agenda (tem 10 D.
A study of potential interconnect sites identified two locations where interconnects were feasible.
Designs for both locations were completed in early 1998. The first, at the intersection of Pine
Ridge Road and Goodlette Frank Road was constructed in the summer of 1998 with a removable
above ground meter and valve assembly, which could be reversed to allow flow in either
direction. City and County staff determined that the removable assembly was too cumbersome to
store and move. They asked that the assemblies be made smaller and then that they be installed
permanently rather than being removed when not in use. The redesign for the second location on
Davis Blvd., east of Lakewood Blvd. was completed in late 2004. Key dates in the history of the
interconnects are outlined in the attached project history document.
On December 17, 2004 staff requested cost proposals from the five contractors under the
"Annual Contract for Underground Construction" to be submitted by January 7, 2005. Proposals
were received from all of the five contractors by the deadline. The proposal amounts were as
follows:
Quality Enterprises USA, Inc.
Mitchell and Stark Construction
Company, Inc.
Haskins, Inc.
Kyle Construction, Inc.
Douglas N. Higgins, Inc.
$184,055.25
$279,740.00
$312,255.00
$340,793.00
$386,850,00
During a post-quote meeting Quality Enterprises USA, Inc, (Quality) identified an error in their
quote relating to the jack and bore casing item in which they did not include the cost of sheeting
of the bore pits. The engineer evaluated the quotes and recommended approval ofQuality's
request to revise their quote for the jack and bore item, which results in their total quote
,,--
Executive Summary
Approve Work Order
Page 2
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 20
becoming $248,884.75. The engineer's recommendation letter dated January 21, 2005 and
supporting documents are attached.
Following the engineer's recommendation and the Purchasing Department's approval, staff
proposes to issue Work Order UC-104 to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc. in the amount of
$248,884.75 for construction of the Collier County and City of Naples Water System
Interconnect at Davis Blvd.
The Clerk's Finance and Accounting Division has reviewed the information contained in this
Executive Summary.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds totaling $273,770.00 are needed; $248,884.75 for construction plus
10% contingencies. Funds in the amount of $126,270,00 are available in the Water Capital Fund
412, Water User Fees, Project 70040 - City I County Water Interconnect, which is included in
the FY 2005 budget approved by the Board on September 23, 2004. According to the Interlocal
Agreement, the City of Naples will reimburse the County for 50% of the cost, or $136,885,00. A
Budget Amendment is needed to transfer $10,615.00 additional funds to this project from project
72520 - NCRWTP Nanofilter Replacement. The source of funds is user fees, Funds for
engineering and CEl services are already encumbered.
-,
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This interconnect is for use during emergencies, so
there is no growth management impact.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners, as Ex-officio the
Governing Board of the Collier County Water Sewer District:
I. Approve, and authorize the Public Utilities Administrator to execute Work Order UC-1 04
in the amount of $248,884.75 to Quality Enterprises USA, Inc. after review by the
County Attorney and approval by the Naples City Council.
2. Approve the necessary budget amendment.
PREPARED BY: Ronald F. Dillard, P.E., Senior Project Manager, Public Utilities Engineering
Department.
/"""'"
Agend3 Item No. 16C5
May 10. /.'005
Page 3 01 20
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF cOUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
15(;5
MlIletlng Date
Recommendatiot1 10 IlrlptoVl! \iVlld'\ Orch:t UC;-1 04 LJr.tler Corltrm:l1l4..3.!-i:}5 in trre <l'l'HllJn1 of
$248,i:l84 75 It:! Quality E nletprises USA, Inc. for c.Ol1struct,on of the Gollier County and
City of Nap'€ls Water Syr.tern inlerccnner;1 at [la'/ls Bivd F'rcject 7D040
51: 0/2005 9 DU (JO AM
Approved By
WHli,Jm Q. MulHn, PE
Principal Project Manager
Ddte
PubHt; \HIUties
Public Utilities F.flgill~efifl9
4/21120058:29 AM
Appro\-'ed By
Paul Mattausoh
Water Oir&:tOf
Oats
Publl-r. UtllillM
Water
4i21/20051\:31 AM
Approved By
Pallu!J4: Libby
W..ter Operations Manager
D.te
p\lblic; Ulilitles
Water
4!21!201'15 9:30 AM
Approved By
l).'tl Wood
PUI(;:IHlslrul Agent
D.te
Admlnistratlve ServIces
PUIt:h8S.ll'ljJ
4/22120DS &:27 AM
Apprond By
Steve Carnefl
Purchas.ing/General SVl;:S Oirectol
D.te
A.dl'l'llrdstratlvt' Servjce~
Purcha!llng
4122/20054:09 PM
Apprond By
HlOm.a.!o Wldes
Operations OlrectOf
lJatf!
Public Utllllle:50
PubUc Utllltles Opelatlon:50
4/25!2005 4:09 PM
Approved By
Roy 8. Ander!>on, P.f:;,
Public Utilities E.nglnufmg Director
Date
Public Utilities
Public Utlltlle:50 Engil'll!:erll'lQ
41261200511 :42 AM
Approved By
James W, Oelony
Public Utilities Admlnlstr.ator
lJilte
Pllblic U\jllttes
Public Utilities Arll"lnl$lralion
4/27J2006'il:10 A.M
Approved By
OMB Cl.lordlnOltor
AUtniniiofl;lUlle Assist8rlt
0...
C<'Iunty Ma";IIg~r'~ Office!
O(flce nf Maoallcmenl & Budg!!t
4i2612n05 4: 26 PM
Approved By
SusoIIn UShtH
Senior ManagementlBlldget Ao..ivst
Dale
County ManOlger's omce
OMce orMan;sgement & Budget
4/29/200510:35 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykm,,"skl
Managemo!nt & audl1e1 Dir(!'ctar
D.te
County MaIl8ge"~ Otfke
omc~ o! MJnagelnent & ButJgel
4!2~H200512:20 PM
Approved By
James. V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Hoard of Count\(
Commls!>toners
County Manager'!. Office
4130120051:20 PM
January 21,2005
HJVI f:C\L:, ,:.:,<:.'):
HOLE MONTES FU~~:: :'TLLlIICJ
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS ' i' : :,' , I
950 Encore Way. Naples FlOrida 34110. Phone 239254 2~OO ; ~~~. ~~54~Q!l7 ": I I
'v') '... . ~ { \ I' l. ..
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 20
Mr. Ronald Dillard
Collier County PUED
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Building H
Naples, FL 34112
RE: EVALUATION OF QUOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION
CITY-COUNTY WATER INTERCONNECT (DAVIS & LAKEWOOD)
HM File No.: 2004.048
Dear Ron:
We have reviewed the five quotations received by the Collier County Public Utilities
Engineering Department on January 8th for the above referenced project. Attached is a recap
summarizing the proposals. Each quotation was checked for mathematical errors, and the quotes
as submitted were correct. Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., submitted the lowest quote of
$184,055.25.
During a post-quote meeting on January 14, 2005, with Quality Enterprises and the County's
Public Utilities Engineering and Purchasing Departments, the representative from Quality
identified an error in his quotation relating to the jack-and-bore casing. He stated the sheeting of
the bore pits was not included, and a revised price of $1,500 per foot was requested. Quality
faxed a revised proposal on January 21,2005, copy attached.
We concur with the reasonableness of the proposed adjustment to the quotation. The original
price for the jack-and-bore bid of $382.25 per foot was too low, and an adjustment is equitable.
We have similarly revised the Engineer's Cost Estimate.
Quality Enterprises USA, Inc., has constructed several County projects, and we understand this
experience has been positive. Hole Montes recommends issuance of the Work Order to Quality
Enterprises USA, Inc., for $248,884.75.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Sincerely yours,
per III, P.E.
Project Management
cc: Lyn Wood, Collier County Purchasing
Sonia Iszler, Hole Montes
H:\2004\2004048\WP\Cl Client Correspondence\20050111 rd ContractAward Itr,doc
Naples' Fort Myers' Venice
III t;
i'- ~ III III
~ 8
'" ~ CJ
I i.
~ .
I .. f
i!
.!l ..
c
::l
III .
:Z ~ :.
, "
Q i I
i
c
8
~
CD
i
e.
i!5t;~
!;i~;:)
..JzO
;:)00
!I~a:
....~~
e~5
1IIa:0
~
~
~
Z
:::I
o
o
~
o
~
i
~
8 8 8 8 ~ 8 8
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" ;i .: ,.: a .; !
III '" = ..
..
8 8 a a 8 ~
g ,.; ~ ~ ~ ~
r-
..
... N .;
.. ..
..
8 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~
lii ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ !il
,.."
i N ~ . ~ ~ l
.. ...
.. .. ...
a 8 8 ~ ~
~ ~
51 ~ ~ 0 ~
.. t a lit ...
.. ..
..
8 ~ 8 ~ 8 8 8
.,; i ~ ~ ! ~ ~
...
! is to ~ a a 0
r- a
.. ..
8 8 8 8 8 8
.,; ~ ~ II l ~
~ ~ to ~ a
.. ...
..
8 8 8 8 8 ~ a
,.; ~ i ~ ! ~ l!!
r-
co
a :: g a N
.. ~ ... li
... ..
8 8 a ~ ~ 8
! .,; ~ ~ a ~
Ii g ~ a
..
8 8 8 ~ a ~ a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" s ! a a ~ ~
~ .. .. ~
8 8 a 8
8 ~ 8 ~
ci ! 0 ~
:: i a fIi
... .. ..
"' 8 ~ a 8 a "'
r- ...
i 8 ~ ~ I i i
. '"
! ti ,.: i a ~ l
lit ...
"' 5\ 8 8 ~ a
... ~ ~, i
,.; ~
r- !
.. .. g .. ~
..
"' ~ ~ :s 1Il ~
PI ~
~ IL ~ ~ ~ ~
...
~ ~ G! fo1~
"' co e.lil !l!
g ~ II ~I i ~
~ ~ i. j
N ~l!
~ ~ g !
III
a: a: ~e ~J~ ~
w w ~i ~
lu lu cl~ !!
::E ::E ~ol 8
s s
~~ ~~ ~ 153!: ~
~Q. ~Q. ~~ Z !'?
~ '" M ... "' CD
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 20
I
"
c
::l
~gi
u ..
I
~
....
II
i
~
'l5
..
-'IN
... ~
III .
:E..I
u....
!i
I
"
5
13
~I.
~!i!
III
I
l!
::l
f
!
..
5
I
j
ci
z
Jan 21 2005 2:43PM HP LRSERJET 3330
BID NO-
COLLIBR COIlNTY
p.2
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 6, of ?-O
COILJBR COUNTYICITY OP NAPLES
WATBR SYSTBM lNTBRCONNBCT
ATDAVlS BLVD
BID SCHBDULB (IIVIS~)
.Id..... prvpaae. to....... ........... ... r......1n acconlace "Ida ... o.tnd DHumena.,
No.
Deaafnlian
.UII& On@lfc,
UnitPQce
Tnt~IPriq
1
16- DIAMBTBR a..A.sB '6$.
DR2S PVCPIPB
LP
325
s
173.75
. 'iA.U...7'li
2
16" DfAMI!T.BR a..ASS %3.5,
DRIB PVC PIPS
LP
64
.$
112. .50
$' 7.200.00
WATBR SYS'I'BM
3 INTBaCONNBCT ASS8M8LY 1.8
WITH VALVES AND MB'l'EIts
I
$.ri'~,840.00,' , , S-1l.t,840.0'1).
..
JACIC AND BORB CROSSINO
WInl30" CASINO
LP
51
. 1.500.00
S 17.000.00
5 NBW O>Naun'BSJDBWALK SY
66
$.
56.00 S ~A5'SAon
6
16"" TAPPING SLB8V8 AND
VALva
&\
J
$. 16_680.0Q $ 16.6'0.00
TOTAL aID PRJC&
$. 21,8.484.75:
Date. 1117/85
\
\-
BID NO.
COLLIER COUNTY
Agenda Item No. 16C5
May 10, 2005
P..aoe 7 of 20
Quality Enterprises USA, inc.
COlLIER COUNI'Y/CITY OF NAPLES
WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT
AT DAVIS BLVD
BID SCHEDULE
Bidder proposes to furnlsh and instaD the following In accordance with the Contract Documents:
No.
Description
llni1 Ouantity
Unit Price
Total Price
1
16" DIAMETER CLASS 165,
DR2S PVC PIPE
LF
325
$ 173.75
$ 56.468.75
2 16" DIAMETER CLASS 235. LF
DRl8 PVC PIPE
WATER SYSTEM
3 INTBRCONNECI' ASSEMBLY LS
WITH V ALVES AND MEfERS
4 JACK AND BORE CROSSING LF
wmI 30" CASINO
64
s
112.50
S 7,200.00
1
$ 77.840.00
$ 77 .840.00
58
$
382.25
$ 22,170.50
S NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK SY
66
$
56.00
$ 3.696.00
6
16" TAPPING SLEEVE AND
VALVE
BA
1
S 16,680.00
$ 16.680.00
TOTAL BID PRICE
$ 184,055.25
BID NO.
..,'~ . ",.CPLLIER COUNTY
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10,2005
Page 8 of 20
COILIBR COUNTY/CITY OF NAPLES
WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECr
AT DAVIS BLVD
BID SCHEDULE
Bidder proposes to furnish and install the foUowing in accordance with the Contract Documents:
No. DescriDtion lli1 Ouantity Unit Price Total Price
16" DIAMETER CLASS 165. S..J1I 0 ~ - ' ~
1 DR2S PVC PIPE ' LF 325 $ LJ~ SOo
2 16" DIAMETER CLASS 235. LF 64 $ ~~ $ ~c~a~
DRI8 PVC PIPE
WATER. SYSTEM DO ' ~C!..
3 INTBRCONNEcr ASSEMBLY LS I S J~iO 00-$ It. to 000-
WITH V ALVES AND METERS
JACK AND BORE CROSSING DC> $ 3a ~~Dqg
4 LF 58 $ i, I C-
WlTII30" CASING
5
NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALl{
SY
66
$ SD~ $ s3oo~
6
16" TAPPING SLEEVE AND
VALVE
EA
1
$ IAOOi:)~ $ )ROOb t!b~
TOTAL BID PRICE
$ 27174b W
~~ "i<.e P,......;t...-.....
Q,... .'c...~ Pe..v.v~r
M.. :+c.-k~l \..S+~..... k t..o..I~;:u ~
BID :'.!C)._
COLLIER COUNT\'
Agenda Item No. 16C5
239-947-3857 Ma~6~05
Pa~e 9 of 20
NAsI/! IN'S I'-ICo
Jan-07-05 02:43P Ha.k1ns Inc.
COU.JE.R COlJN'l'YlClTY OF NAPLES
W A'CER SYS'JCM IN'mRCONNECT
ATDAVlS BLVD
BlD SCHEDULE
Bidder proposes to fluDish .ad iIIstaIl the toUowin81D aerenlanee willi tbe Co.tr... >>oeumentrr
No;
DescDrxion
Unil Quantity
Unit Price
Total Price
16.' O.lAME1T:.R Cl..ASs 165.
DR2.1PVCPIPE
l..f
32.5
95- .31,875'
$_ S
2 l6" l>1AME1T:.R CLASS 235. Lf
l)RJ8 PVCPfPB
WATER SYSTt:M
3 lNTERCONNSC.:T A.~Ll' r.s
WITH v A1.. vr...c; AND ME'l'EL~
4 JACK AND 80RJ:: CROSSING 11
WITH 30" ('.ASING
64 S 2.,5- $ I~ {PPO"
s /2~~' S ,/.14'., i!?f?O'"
58 $ Z~/()o. s /21., ~-
5 NEW CONC.RI:iE SJDEW ~ Sy
66
s 3P-
s 19~-
6
16" T APflIINO S1..EEVE ANn
v AI.VE
EA
s ~ ~b $ 2~ P(:)O':...'
"l.OT AI. RID PlUCi.
s ~/2..!255-
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 20
;aID NO. #1'r
COLLIER COUNTY
~JF aQ'sj
COLLIBR COUNTY/CITY OF NAPLES
W ATFR SYSTBM IN'TERCONNEcr
AT DAVIS BLVD
BID SCHEDULE
Bidder proposes to t'umilh and iDstaB the foUowiD, iD ~e with the Caatract Doatments:
.''io.
Description
!l!Ltl Quantity Unit Price Total Price
LF 32.5 $~ $ S-S,I1S(JO
1
16"DIAMETERL1.ASS 165,
DR2S PVC PIPE
2 16" DlAMIiTIiR ClASS ns, LF
DR18 pve PlPB
WATER SYS1'EM
3 INTERCONNEcr ASSBMBL Y LS
WITH VALVES AND MEmRs
4 JAQ( AND BORE CROSSING LP
WlTH JO" CASING
64 $ 1J..~.C1IO S~ iiO 4d
1
,.;1 <2::)
$ 7~~ s 7~v(jotJ
58
$-4i~.(SO s /6I,'17r100
5
NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK
Sy
66
s./J$.m
.$ 3.1b~CO
.
6
16-TAPPING SLEEVE AND
VALVE
1M
J
<<:J1
S ~ l/{X)
$&400"
TOTAL BID PIUCE
$ 3f'tJ6 71.lCJD
I -Gf
6Lst.etrSI trS
.:lW INn 1.J..:1NJ I S"4.n ') 3"'1J..l1
"SlIZD JiU) .L1J uer
[I-
II
BID NO,
COLLIER COUNTY
Agenda Item No. 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 20
COllIER COUNTY/CITY OF NAPLES
WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNEcr
AT DAVIS BLVD
BID SCHEDULE
Bidder proposes to furnish and iDstaD the foUowing in accordance with the Contract Documents:
No.
Description
Unit Ouantity
Unit Price
Total Price
1
16" DIAMETER CLASS 165.
DR25 PVC PIPE
LF
325
$ 190.00
$ 61,750.00
2 16" DIAMETER CLASS 235, LF
DR18 PVC PIPE
WATER SYSTEM
3 INTERCONNECf ASSEMBLY LS
WITH VAL YES AND MBTERS
4 JACK AND BORE CROSSING LF
WITH 30" CASING
64
$ 195.00
$ 12.480.00
1
$! 15,000.00
$ 115,000.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 174,000.00
58
5 NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK SY
66
$
70.00
4,620.00
$
6
16" TAPPING SLEEVE AND
VALVE
BA
1
$ 19,000.00
$. 19,000.00
TOTAL BID PRICE
$ 386,850,00
DOUGLAS N. HIGGINS, INC.
2889 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 1
Naples, Florida 34112
Phone: 239-774-3130
Fax: 239-774-4266
8t:. II 8-" SO.
'a 'J 'n "tII
':~.
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of20
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
FOR EMERGENCY WATER INTERCONNE~r
This Agreement is luade and entered into between the City
of Naples, Florida, a Florida municipal .corporation
(hereinafter "CITY") and the Board of County COItUA1.ssioners of
Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier
County and as EX-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier
County ~~ater-Sewer District (hereinafter together referred to
as the "COUNTY").
WUEREAS, CITY and COUNTY desire to provide for water needs
for their respective water supply systellls during emergency,
periods of reduced availability from their normal sources; and
WUEREAS, CITY and COUN'.fY as' neighboring local governments
with existing facilities capable of furnishing limited potable
water supplies to each other, agree to enter into an agl.-eement
outlining the terms upon which each will furnish water to the
,other in times of reduced availability from lIormalsupplies;
and
WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interests of both CI'l'Y
and COUNTY to make this provision for <lugloent.ing water supplies
if such a need should arise;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other
good and valuable consideration, it is agreed:
1. Subject to the terms of this Agreeloent, CI'l'Y agrees to
SUPply to COUN'I"{ Such potable water as is available within the
CITY water system that is Over and above the needs and demands
of the CITY and the customers of its water service area. Said
service to loaintain the best available pressure at the
discharge side of the Meter and Dackflow Assembly, as to limit
adVerse effects to supplier's customers.
2. Subj ect to the terms of this Agreelllent, COUHTY agrees to
supply to CITY SUch potable water as is available within the
COUNTY water system that is over and above the needs and
demands of, the COUNTY and the customers ot: its water service
area. Said service to maintain the best available pressure at
the diScharge side of the Meter and Dackflow Assembly, as to
limit adVerse effects to supplier's customers.
J. Water supplied under this Agreement shall be deliVered to,
and received from permanent or telllporary interconnecting
facilities at several points wbere tbe County'S and City'S
water systems are in close Pl.-o)Cilui ty. 'I'he approximate
locations are to be Inutually agreed upon in writing. 'l'be
nature of the emergency and availability from the supplying
system shall dictate the nWllber and locations, of the
interconnects acti va ted. 'rhe requesting Utility shall identify
to the supplying Utility, the inte,rconnect it desires to be
activated, SUbject to limitations in availability of the
supplying Utility. Said interconnecting faCilities,
hereinafter, referred to as liThe Interconnect.., shall be
const ei ther a tem orary or ermanent manner as is
shown conceptually ~n Ex .1 ~ 0 .1.S Agree!Qen ::::
All estimated costs for desiqn and construction of 'l'he
Interconnect will be reviewed and approved by both the County
an,d City prior to COJomencelllent of construction. Upon'
completion of the desiqn and construction, the City shall
reimburse the County for one-half of the cost incurred by the
County to desiqn (dh-ect labor only), construct, and manage
(direct labor only) the project. Said cost sharing shall be
subject to the fOllOWing:
a. The design and construction of The Interconnects shall be
administered b9' COUN'l'Y.
L
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 13 of 20
b. During construction, COUN'l'Y will 'advise and obtain
approval of CITY in advance of any proposed Change Orders
to the construction contract. The COUNTY shall be solely
responsible for administering the construction contract,
including issuance of all Change Orders.
4. Subsequent to completion of construction of 'fhe
Interconnect, ownership of that portion of The Interconnect up
to and including the isolation valve which controls the flow of
water entering into or being received frODI 'l'he Interconnect
shall be owned by the Utility who's system the valve controls
access to. The physical interconnect from isolation ,valve to
isolation valve shall be the mutual property of both the City
and County. Maintenance, repair and l.-eplacement of the
mutually owned portion of the interconnect shall be the
responsibility of the County to administer with the costs being
equally shared by both parties, as follows:
a. The Interconnect, shall be designed to include provisions
for locking features at the hatch covers of both vaults
which house the isolation valves, so that each party can
have individual keyed access. Each party shall have sole
access to locking device for its valve operator which,
when opened, provides water to or receives water from the
other party. 'l'he County shall be responsible for
maintaining, repairing; and replacing as needed all
structural aspects of the IRutually owned portion of the
interconnects, from the County's isolation valve back to
the City's isolation valve, ....ith the cost of such
maintenance being shared equally, based on invoiped parts
costs and billed labor rates.
5. Water provided by one party to the other under the
prov~s~ons of this Agreement shall be only that water needed to
provide tenlporary assistance in the event one party has an
emergency need for water beyond that availability in its own
system, subject to excess supply in the supplying system.
Water shall be provided subject to the following conditions:
a..
The two parties shall designate a member of its permanent,
staff who shall receive all requests, and who shall have
the authority to approve or disapprove requests.
Both parties agree that this agreement shall not apply to
reasons of exceeded design or capacity limits on plant or
infrastructure facilities.
b.
c.
Each request for emergency water service shall be acted
upon in good faith and in a timely manner by both parties.
By entering into this agreement both parties agree to
supply said service subject to availability as described
above. However, the receiving Utility is not obligated to
accept any specie ic volumes of ....a ter, and termination of
service shall occur when the need for emergency water
service has been resolved.
d.
At its discretion, the supplying party llIay establish, and
enforce by unilateral control of valves under its control,
lilnits as to: times of day and/or days of the week during
which delivery will or will not be made; the rates of flow
at which delivery will be lRade; and/or the total volume of
water to be delivered over one or more designated periods.
However, these controls will only be used as a Ineans of
addressing availability' constraints. Neither party shall
be responsible for any adverse effects that its
adjustments of valve settings, flows, and/or pressure
IRight produce in the water system and/or customer's
property of any other parties receiving water. through
either respective water system.
'l'he receiving party agrees to exercise prompt and diligent
efforts to eliminate its need to obtain emergency
supplies.
e.
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 20
6. It is mutually agreed that whenever water is supplied
under the terms of this Agreement, the receiving party shall
pay the supplying party for all water received, in accordance
with the following:
a. Payment shall be on a per thousand gallon basis, as
measured by the appropriate lneter in 'l'he Interconnect.
The meter shall be read jointly by the two parties at the
following times: when the valves first are opened at the
beginning of the delivery in response to a request for
water; at the time of the final termination of all
deliveries of water in response to that request; and if
necessary, at approximately the first of each calendar
lnOnth that occurs between the beginning amI termination of
the response to that request. It shall be the
responsibility of the supplying pilrty to schedule all
readings of the meter at mutually agreeable times.
b. It shall be the responsibility of the SUpplying utility to
make annual checks of the accuracy, of the permanent
interconnect meter or meters used to SUpply water to each
party. If non permanent interconnects are utilized in
part or for all interconnects meters shall be tested by
the County at the time of installation. Said test results
shall be forwarded to the City upon request. If a party
receiving water under the. terms of this Agreement should
believe that a bill for water received might have been
based upon readings from an inaccurate meter, Upon request
the County shall perform an additional check of the
meter's accuracy, with the City present if desired.
Should that addi tionill check reveal accul-acy within the
limits of the manufacturers recomloended accuracy, then the
cost of obtaining the check shall be borne entirely by the
requesting party.
c. If either an annual check or an additional check of
ac~uracy reveals an error beyond the limit of the
manufacturers recommended accuracy, it shall be assumed
that the inaccuracy was in existence for the later
one-half of the period of time from the last check that
indicated acceptable ilCcuracy. Any billings that occurred
during that period shall be adjusted to reflect the
quantity of over read or under read exceeding the
appropriate limit of accuracy, at the rate per thousand
gallons that was in effect at the time delivery Occurred.
d. The rate each receiving party will pay, per thousand
gallon basis, will be set ilt Collier County's actual
production cost of its water. This rate will be reviewed
annually for necessary adjustments.
7. This Agreement shall remain in full force and affect until
terminated upon sixty (60) days written notice by el~ler party
to the other at its sole discretion.
8. It is understood and agreed by and between the two parties
that if any condition or provision contained in this Agreement
is held to be invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity shall not affect any other condition or
provision and does not materially prejudice either party in its
respecti ve rights and obligations contained in the remaining
valid conditions or provisions of this Agreement.
9. No waiver of any breach of this Agreenlent shall be held to
be a waiver of any other subsequent breach.
IN IHTNESS 'I'HEREOF,
executed this Agreement
signature.
the parties hereto have made
on the 1.especti ve dates under
and
each
IN
executed
\'lITNESS 'l'lIEREOF, the parties hereto have made and
this Agreement on the respective dates under each
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 15 of 20
signature: COLLIER COUWrY through its DOARD OJ? COUI-lTY
COMMISSIONERS, signing by and through its Chairlllan'17, _ a~;:;;;::..utho_..._r__ized
to execute same by Board Action on the/~ day of ~ '
1994; and CITY OF NAPLES through its CITY COUNCI~, s~gn~ng by
and through its Mayor, authprized to execute sallie by Council
action on the /t/M~ day of .x2yxtu"lllHA... , 1994.
DATEQ~~~/J7Y
Ar-.r.ES'r: /'; .~, lJ/,,' ,
DW,igh:t E.";; Bn>J;k, Clerk
..~_~:\~;..;~t.~f'~~"I.:~:~:'~'<~;, ~ .
':~:'~~~.~~\-47.tZ
.~. '. ~ ~.::~H~.:.,~( :.~~:~~.</.~~ t ~
Appro~~,';>a';;!;t~ol". forlll and
legal ~1)~fi~?clency:
0. ~"'" C. O~
" O('-K n Cuyler, cou\fty Attorney
ATTEST:
Janet Cason, Clerk
(~l J(_<~' (---.. ,"''-
,.'
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
fI>/;
Maria J. Cfiiaro, city Attorney
kbcllw/12619
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND AS TJIE
GOVERNING BODY OF COLLI En..\'eo,O'NTY'f,
AND AS E~FFICIO THE ~DV.ERN:rNG',:)'.:,
g~~~rcf. COLLIER C07;:;~~~~:::,;j:1\\
"~r" ,.,. ).' ..,.
. \ :{:,:: :;:;,,>,; '.: ::::::' ~',,,~:,4,, ./
l3y. ",. JAt ."..'. , '" , . ,
, . "', '" . I. .
'I no hy. t.l1).e~'".<;ha rllla..n'
Da ;. ~. f::-" r." .,"
~ ,.,\.
. ~7.'''UI1H.'
NAPLES eI'n COUNCIL OF NAPLES,
FLORIDA
CITY / COUNTY WATER INTERCONNECT
PROJECT HISTORY
Agenda !tern No. 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 20
9-14-94 BCC and Naples City Council approve Interlocal Agreement
for Emergency Water Interconnect.
6-11-96 BCC approved Work Order HMA-FT-96-3 for engineering
services. Agenda Item 16-B-1.
5-5-98 BeC approved proposal for construction of first interconnect at
Pine Ridge Road and Goodlette Frank Road. Agenda Item 16-
B-5.
Aug. 98 First interconnect completed.
1999 City and County staffs decided the removable interconnect was
too cumbersome to store and move.
2000 Engineer suggested alternative designs and staffs chose smaller
permanent installations.
8- 7 -00 Requested proposal from engineer to redesign as a permanent
installation.
8-17-0 Received redesign proposal from engineer.
8-28-0 Redesign proposal sent to City for approval.
3-6-01 Redesign proposal sent to City again at their request.
2003-05 First interconnect relocated as part of Goodlette Frank Road
widening project as a permanent installation.
12-17-03 Naples City Council approved engineer's redesign proposal.
3-31-04 Work Order HM-FT-04-02 for redesign approved
administratively.
1-8-05 Five quotes received for construction of second interconnect on
Davis Blvd.
5-8-05 Construction Work Order DC-1 04 to BCC for approval.
5-18-05 Scheduled for Naples City Council approval.
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 20
WORK ORDER UC-104
"ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR UNDERGROUND CONSTftUCTION"
Contract 04-3535, Dated March 9, 2004
This Worle Order is for general contracting services, subject to the tE ,rms and conditions of the
Contract referenced above, for Work known as:
Collier County J City of Naples Water System Interconnect at Davis Blvd.
The work i:; specified in the revised proposal dated January 17, 2005 from Quality Enterprises USA,
Inc" which is attached hereto and made a part of this Work Order. In llccordance with Terms and
Conditions of the Agreement referenced above, Work Oreler UC-1C4 is assigned to Quality
Enterprise~ USA. Inc,
Scope of lllork: Provide all services called for in the plans and specificat ons to construct the Collier
County I Ci':y of Naples Water Systems Interconnect at Davis Blvd,
Schedule flf Work: Complete work within 60 calendar days from Noti:e to Proceed. Liquidated
damages will be assessed at $857.00 per day for each day this time is exc!eded.
Compensation: In accordance with Item 4 of the Agreement, the County' Nill compensate the Firm in ,
accordanc.:! with the unit prices provided in the proposal.
TOTAL PRICE:
$248.884.75
Any changEI made subsequent to final department approval will be consil~ered an additional service
and chargE!C:I according to an executed Change Order as enumerated in Ex ,ibit 0 of the Agreement.
PREPARE[I BY:
JfIJ.:K/oS
Date
/)4-/Zltt:
/ Date
1f'-12 -~5
Date
REVIEWED BY:
AUTHORIZED BY:
APPROVEI:, BY:
, DeLany, P.E,. Public Utilities Administrator Date
...-
ACCEPTED BY: "1.'f/-O':>
Date
Approved a~ to Form and
Legal Suffi(~ency:
Assistant County Attorney
Date
Fund: 412 Cost Center: 273512 Object Code: 763100 Project Number: 70040
[.1::
0UALJ1'"
ENTERPRI~iES
USA. , N ~~,
IJc 'C8-~72J I
Agenda Item No. ; 6C5
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 20
JanWl)' 17,2005
s.nt vh FAX: 239-530-5371
.nd U.U ...11
Ronald F. DiI8rd. P.E.
Senior Project Manager
Collier G:nmty PubIi: utiles Engineering Dep81ment
3301 Tmiani Trail East
ThirdRDOf, Buicling H
Naples, I=t. 34112
HE: RIIfUIII for QuotaItoII 'R_Hd)
-co.r Ce\HIly aM (I.y 0111.... W...
Sy8e.n Interconnect It .....1IouIawd"
Dear Mr. D..-cJ:
Enclose(1 please &ld our revised quotaIion due to the depII d the Jack and aore. QuaIly Enlerprises
USA, Inc, will be able to ~ the wa1c In sixty (80) days from lie dale of the "NDtice ~ Proceed".
Sincerel~'.
t?2~r! ~
VICe PmlUclent
End.
cc: l.yn Wood. C.P.M.
Gall. County Purchasing. "'a FaDe 239-732.{)844
Ii. CIIford Pepper III. P.E.
HOle Montes via FaK: 239-254-2097
~ '1 J
1081inleffi CCUrl
ChE'stlpl..lke. VA 23320
PSII >48-8000
Fax (7571548-2600
3S'14 M<.wIniK OrM!. Suite 21 b
Naples. FL 34114-5406
(2391435-7200
Fax (239) 435-7202
30~ Piedmont Court
1>Itl<nta. GI' 30340
{678/ 72lH>038
Faar; 1678' 728.0039
,#
DID NO.__
COLLIEn COUNTY
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 19 of 20
COu..IER COUNTY/CITY OF NAPLES
WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNEcr
AT DA VIS BLVD
BID SCHEDULE (REVISED)
BIdder pr(J I.oses to Curnlsh and Jnslall the following 111 accordallce wllh Ule Contract Documents:
No.
Dcacription
!hill Oual}tity
Unit Price
Total Price
J6" DIAMBTER CLASS 165.
DR2S PVC PIPE
LF
325
$
173.75
$ 56~46R.7'i
2
J 6" mAMBTER CLASS 235,
DR 18 PVC PIPE
LF
64
$
112 . 50
$ 7.200.00
WATER SYSTEM
3 INTE:nCONNBCf ASSEMBLY LS
WITn V ALVES AND MBTERS
I
$ 77 ,840.00 _ $-I.Z.J840.00
4
JACK AND BORE CROSSING
WITH 30" CASINO
LF
S8
$ 1,500.00 _ $ 87,000.00
.5 NEW CONCRETE SIDBW ALK SY
66
$
56.00, $ 1.696.00
6
16"l'APPING SLEEVE AND
VALVE
EA
I
$ 16.680.00
$ 16.680.00
TOTAL DID PRICE
$ 248,884.75
By:
Date: 1117/05
Agenda Item No, 16C5
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 20
Project Name:
Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3. Qtr4 . Qtr1 Qtr2' Qtr3 . Qtr4 . Qtr1 .. Qtr2 · Qtr3 . Qtr4. Qtr1 . Qtr2 '.. Qtr3 . Qtr4., Qtr1 . Qtr2 . Qtr3 .,Qtr4
~ ~ ~
EVENT
Land Acquisition $0
Land Use Zonin $0
Design/Permit $24,336
Construction $248,885
Inspection $8,670
Project Tota. $281,891
-
I-
-
Recommended Action: Recommendation to approve Work Order UC-I04
under Contract 04-3535 in the amount of $248,884.75 to Quality Enterprises
USA, Inc., for construction of the Collier County and City of Naples Water
System Interconnect at Davis Blvd., Project 70040.
Agenda Item No, 16D1
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve McDonald's, Inc. as a sole source supplier of
breakfast sandwiches for the Summer Food Service Program, with an
estimated Fiscal Year 2005 expenditure of $32,200
OBJECTIVE: To provide free nutritious meals during the summer to Collier County
children living in disadvantaged neighborhoods.
CONSIDERA TIONS: The Summer Food Service Program is a grant funded by the
United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service and administered by
the Florida Department of Education. The purpose of the program is to ensure that
children can receive the same high quality meals during the summer as provided by the
schools during the school year. The grant reimburses agencies that serve free meals to
children eighteen years and under in neighborhoods that qualify. Neighborhood eligibility
is determined by census income data or by the percentage of children who receive free
and reduced meal service during the school year, An ofImmokalee and Everglades City
and many neighborhoods in the Naples area are eligible.
~'
Staff has successfully administered the Summer Food Service Program for the past
twenty-one years in conjunction with the summer camp program. In 2004 the grant
provided 107,268 breakfasts, 124,754 lunches, and 1,305 snacks for a total
reimbursement of $448,312.26. This summer the program will provide an estimated
120,000 breakfasts, 120,000 lunches and 4,000 snacks. The County wi11 be reimbursed
based on the number of meals served and the costs of administering the program.
Three vendors, Burger King, Wendy's, and McDonald's, were asked to provide
quotations for providing breakfast sandwiches for the program. Burger King and
Wendy's were contacted repeatedly, but declined to bid. McDonald's, Inc. is the only
vendor equipped and willing to supply goods in the required volume. The food items
used meet State Regulations and have been approved for use by the State Food and
Nutrition Department. McDonald's has provided the Summer Food Program with
breakfast items for the past four summers. It is estimated that this summer McDonald's,
Inc. will supply approximately 46,000 breakfast sandwiches at $.70 each,
FISCAL IMPACT: The program is budgeted under the FY 05 Food Grant Fund in the
amount of$586,400. The State will reimburse the County for 100% of expenses.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: No impact is associated with this action.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approves
McDonald's, Inc. as a sole source supplier of breakfast sandwiches for the Summer Food
Service Program, with an estimated Fiscal Year 2005 expenditure of $32,200.
PREPARED BY: Amanda Townsend, Operations Analyst, Parks and Recreation
"-"
Agenda Item No. 1601
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 3
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
1601
Meeting Date
Recommendation to approve McDonald's, Inc, as a sole source supplier of breakfast
sandwiches for the Summer Food Service Program, with an estimated Fiscal Year 2005
expenditure of $32,200,
5/10/2005 9:00:00 AM
Approved By
Kathy Carpenter
Executive Secretary
Date
Public Services
Public Services Admin.
4/11/200510:44 AM
Approved By
Brenda Brilhart
Purchasing Agent
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/19/200512:34 PM
Approved By
Mike Hauer
Acquisition Manager
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/19/20053:49 PM
Approved By
Murdo Smith
Beach and Water Superintendent
Date
Public Services
Parks and Recreation
4/19/2005 5:55 PM
Approved By
Marla Ramsey
Parks & Recreation Director
Date
Public Services
Parks and Recreation
4/22/2005 2:56 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/26/20059:08 AM
Approved By
Gary A. Vincent
Management & Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/2612005 1 :37 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/2712005 1 :32 PM
Approved By
James V, Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4/27/2005 4:57 PM
Agenda Item No. 1601
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of3
Justification for McDonalds
Burger King -
I spoke to the owners whose offices are in Belle Glade, Fl. They do not have enough
outlets to produce the volume needed for this program and also had a concern regarding
keeping the meals hot. They declined to bid on providing the meals.
Wendy's -
They are not equipped to handle a program of our size and were not responsive to the
idea of opening early to produce breakfasts for our program.
McDonald's -
McDonald's, Inc. has provided the Summer Food Program breakfast the past (4) four
summers. The food items used meet State Regulations and have been approved for use by
the State Food and Nutrition Department. McDonald's management has expressed a
willingness to work with the County and is looking forward to helping the Collier County
Summer Food Program any way possible.
Jim Thomas
Summer Food Director
Collier County Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item No. 1602
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 9
,-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve a modification in the amount of $9,345.90 to Purchase Order #
4500038389 with Newspaper Printing Company, Inc. for printing of the
Recreation Guide
Obiective: To increase the scope of purchase order # 4500038389 with Newspaper
Printing Company, Inc. for printing of the Recreation Guide.
Considerations: At the beginning of the fiscal year staff solicited quotations for
printing of the Recreation Guide from Naples Printing, Minuteman Press, and Newspaper
Printing Company. On November 9, 2004, purchase order # 4500038389 in the amount
of $20,000 was issued to Newspaper Printing Company, Inc., the low quote, for printing
ofthe Recreation Guide.
Due to additional programming, the size of this year's summer publication has increased
four pages over last year's summer issue. Also, greater demand has necessitated an
increase of 5,000 to the summer print run. Due to these unforeseen increases, staff
expended beyond the limit ofthe open purchase order. Staff is now requesting a purchase
order modification in the amount of $9,345.90 to cover the charges incurred. Staff will
conduct the formal bid process for subsequent printings.
_.
Fiscal Impact: Funds are available within the Parks and Recreation Department
Recreation Programs budget (Fund 111).
Growth Manaaement Impact: No Growth Management Impact is associated with
this action.
Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners approves a modification
in the amount of$9,345.90 to purchase order # 4500038389.
Prepared by: Amanda O. Townsend, Operations Analyst, Parks and Recreation
,-..
Agenda Item No. 1602
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 9
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Meeting Date
1602
Approve a modification in the amount of $9,345.90 to Purchase Order # 4500038389 with
Newspaper Printing Company, Inc. for printing of the Recreation Guide.
5/10/2005 9:00:00 AM
Item Number
Item Summary
Approved By
Kathy Carpenter Executive Secretary Date
Public Services Public Services Admin. 4/19/20052:33 PM
Approved By
Brenda Brilhart Purchasing Agent Date
Administrative Services Purchasing 4/20/2005 11 :06 AM
Approved By
Murdo Smith Beach and Water Superintendent Date
Public Services Parks and Recreation 4/20/200512:26 PM
Approved By
Marla Ramsey Parks & Recreation Director Date
Public Services Parks and Recreation 4/21/2005 2:32 PM
Approved By
Mike Hauer Acquisition Manager Date
Administrative Services Purchasing 4/22/2005 8:59 AM
Approved By
Steve Carnell Purchasing/General Svcs Director Date
Administrative Services Purchasing 4/22/20054:12 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator Administrative Assistant Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 4/26/2005 9:15 AM
Approved By
Gary A. Vincent Management & Budget Analyst Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 4/27/2005 1 :30 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski Management & Budget Director Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 4/27/2005 1 :38 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd County Manager Date
Board of County
Commissioners County Manager's Office 4/28/2005 2:00 PM
~~N P C J 1601 Soulft Cleveb.I Avt, SlitfI9
.e ft. MyeB, tlorida 33907
. ...~ (941)411-1116
IE'SPUII '11111B CU'UY r.:{941141J.152S
Agenda Item No. 1602
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 9
Sales Quote
Quote Number 25457
For Collier County Parks & Recreation
Peg Ruby
3300 Santa Barbara Blvd
Naples, FL 34116
Phone 239-353-0404
PublicatioD Recreation Guide
Pagel;
Paper Stock
Inks
Quantity
PrOtess
PreparatioD
Finish/HiDdery
Pllckllgiog
Delivery
Pricing
Additiooal
Cha~es
Schedule
TerlXli
September 7, 2004
Fax 239-353-1002
Fini,hed Sue
8 ~.. x 10 ~.I."
Imal!'t Area
7 W' x 10"
Bleed Area
8 %" x 11 W'
Cover: 4 Pagcs Text: 52 or 96 PagC::$
Cover: 7pt Hi-Bulk Text: 50lb. White Wove
Black + I Spot Color All
40,000, 45,000, 50,000
Heat/Cold
PDF files to NPC specifioations.
Stitch & Trim
StrB.p &. Skid
F.O.B. - Naples, Florida
""" Please see Page 2 for Pricing Information"
Tax if applicable, boxes. and any miscellaneous work that is rcqllircd to prepare job for
printing are at additiOIlal cost to the q\Wted price.
Unless credit has heeD previously c:stablished, the customer must pay 50% down and
balance due prior ro delivery with cash or cashier's chec:1c. Company cbecks may he
accepted if there is a seven day period prior to printing.
Job acceptance $ubj cd to review or supplied materials. Prielng is valid for 30 clays. Paper is subject
to availability and price at time of ordering.
Sincerely,
Subject to terms aDd tonditions on reverse side.
Colin Wood
Sales Representative
111'3 3!:)l;1d
:)dN
S6ZL6E8E18
S::Tl P00ZILg/60
,
Page 2
Quote Number 25457
Collier County Parks & Recreation - Peg Ruby
40.000
Cover: + 52 Pages: $11,910.00
45.000
$12,945.00
Cover + 96 Pages: $18,240.00
$19,905.00
Agenda Item No. 1602
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 9
50.000
$13,975.00
$21,555.00
e:ra/~0 39IJd
8dN
~6ZL6E8Et8 ~t:tt ~0raZIL0/6B
,.-"'"""""'-....,.... ,,'~,-~~.
QUOTATION
Agenda Item No. 1602
May 10, 2005
MinutemfrfPJ~~of 9
1237 Airport Road South
Naples, FL 34104-4816
Phone: (239) 261-1198
FAX: (239) 261-5486
Web Address: MinutemanNaples.com
Email ID:Printing@MinutemanNaples.com
Collier County Parks and Recreation
3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard
Naples. FL 34116-6601
ATTN : Peg Ruby
Ph : 239 353-0404
Date :
25-Aug-2004
40000 aecreation Guide
(Order '40566)
Printed 1 Side{s)
8.5 X 11 White 50# Offset
Ink Color{s): Blac~
40000
Alternative
Printed 1 Side{
8.5 X 11 White 3
Ink Color(s) :
Miscellaneous:
$18,374.40
Note: Shipping
50000 aecreation auide
(Order '40564)
Printed 1 Side(s)
8.5 X 11 White 50# Offset
Ink Color(s): Black #0,
$26,427.20
Salesperson: Mont Williams..
Prices do not include applicable n~s
Quote valid for 30 days.
Thank you,
Minuteman Press:
Agenda Item No. 1602
May 10, 2005
Page 6of9
50000 Recreation auide - 56 Text Page. - 35' Alternate
(Order '"'0563)
Printed 1 Side(s)
8.5 X 11 White 35# Alternate Offset
Ink Color(s}: Black #0, Amazon
$21,481. 60
Salesperson: Mont William$
Prices do not include 8pplicablels~~s
Quote valid for 30 days.
Thank you,
Minuteman Press:
QUOTATION
Agenda Item No. 1602
May 10,2005
. Paae 70f9
Minuteman ,,"ress
1237 Airport Road South
Naples, FL 34104-4816
Phone: (239) 261-1198
FAX: (239) 261-5486
Web Address: MinutemanNaples.com
EmailID:Printing@MinutemanNaples.com
Collier County Parks and Recreation
3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard
Naples, FL 34116-6601
ATTN : Peg Ruby
Ph : 239 353-0404
Date:
25-Aug-2004
40000 aecreation Guide
(Order 140562)
40000
(Order .40561)
Printed 1 Siders)
8.5 X 11 White 35#
Ink Color (s) :
$24,680.00
50000 aecreation Guide
(Order 140560)
Printed 1 Side(s)
8.5 X 11 White 50# Offset
Ink Color(s): Black #0,
$37,521.60
Salesperson: Mont Williarri~.. .......... .....
Prices do not include applicable sales taxes/ ·
Quote valid for 30 days.
Thank you,
Minuteman Press:
Agenda Item No. 1602
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 9
50000 aecreation Guide - 96 Text Page. - 35' Alternate
(Order 140538)
Printed 1 side{s}
8.5 X 11 White 35* Alternate Offset
Ink Color(s}: Black *0, Amazon
$29,072.00
Salesperson: Mont Williams, ",
Prices do not include applicable_l,s
Quote valid for 30 days.
Thank you,
Minuteman Press:
Agenda It~~.l~~
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 9
~u,?y =P m
From: NaplesPI@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 20041:14 PM
To: ruby_p
Subject: recreation guide
Peg,
This email confirms our telephone conversation noting naples printing, inc. declines the opportunity to quote on
the recreation guide. reason: guidlines too tight, too competitive pricing from vendors outside collier county.
thank you,
mike couture
10/12/2004
Agenda Item No. 1603
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 8
,,-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve Change Order #8 in the amount of $119,772
for additional construction observation, permit modifications, and
reimbursables for North Naples Regional Park, Contract #99-2947
Obiective: To complete the construction observation and permit modifications
necessary to finish the North Naples Regional Park project.
Considerations: On May 23, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)
awarded Contract #99-2947 to Bellomo-Herbert and Company in the amount of
$1,195,190 for the design and permitting of the North Naples Regional Park. Staff has
since approved Change Orders #1 through 4 in the total amount of$93,174 for additional
wetland surveying, building surveying and staking, architectural design, environmental
studies, and services of a consulting agronomist. On June 24, 2003 the BCC approved
Change Order #5 in the amount of $77,358.75 for additional design service fees. Staff
approved Change Orders #6 (zero dollar change to reallocate resources) and #7 in the
amount of $54,925 for architectural and engineering revisions and permit modifications.
_.
Due to the significant expanison of the scope of the project since the design contract was
signed in 1999, the original anticipated construction schedule of six (6) months has
increased to twenty (20) months. As a result, additional construction observations and
reviews are required by the consultant to guarantee a quality product. Additionally,
permit modifications of the engineering plans have been neccessitated as has a water use
permit extension. Also, the budget for reimbursable expenses has been increased to
account for the additional construction time and project scope. In line with the larger
project than originally anticipated, the consultant's timeframe requires expansion to
accommmodate the General Contractor's schedule. These changes total $119,772 of
additional compensation.
County purchasing policy requires that any change order amount over 10% of the current
Board-approved amount be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Change
Orders # 1 through 5 combined exceed the amount allowed by staff authorization, which
requiried Board approval of Change Order #5. Since that time, Change Orders #6, 7 and 8
cummulatively exceed the amount authorized by the BCC, thereby requiring BCC
approval ofthis Change Order #8.
Fiscal Impact: The necessary funds are budgeted in the North Naples Regional Park
project, Fund (346).
Growth Manaaement Impact: North Naples Regional Park will be inventoried in the
Growth Management Plan.
"....".
Agenda Item No. 1603
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 8
Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners approves Change Order
#8 in the amount of $] 19,772 for additional construction observation, permit
modifications, and reimbursables for North Naples Regional Park, to Contract #99-2947.
Prepared by: Amanda O. Townsend, Operations Analyst, Parks and Recreation
~..-..
_.
Agenda Item No. 1603
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 8
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Meeting Date
1603
Recommendation to approve Change Order #8 in the amount of $119,772 for additional
construction observation, permit modifications, and reimbursables for North Naples
Regional Park, Contract #99-2947.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Item Number
Item Summary
Approved By
Kathy Carpenter
Executive Secretary
Date
Public Services
Public Services Admin.
4/19/20058:14 AM
Approved By
Murdo Smith
Beach and Water Superintendent
Date
Public Services
Parks and Recreation
4/19/2005 5:32 PM
Approved By
Linda Jackson
Contracts Agent
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/20/2005 8:37 AM
Approved By
Marla Ramsey
Parks & Recreation Director
Date
Public Services
Parks and Recreation
4/21/20054:52 PM
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General Svcs Director
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/25/2005 11 :51 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/26/20059:11 AM
Approved By
Susan Usher
Senior Management/Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/27/20052:57 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/28/2005 8:51 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/29/2005 8:46 AM
CHANGE ORDER # 8
FROM:
Board of Collier Coup.ty Commissioners .
Collier County Parks and Recreation Dept.
3300 Santa Barbara Blvd.
Naples, FL. 34116
Project Name: Implementation of a Master Plan for the North Naples Regional Park
Project No. 80602
Contract Dated: May 23,2000
Change Order No.: 8
Change Order Description:
This Change Order #8 is in connection to the extended length of construction observation
services from our original agreement, additional permitting services and a reimbursable expense
budget increase. Refer to attached Scope prepared by Bellomo-Herbert for additional
information.
Agenda Item No. 1603
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 8
TO:
Bellomo-Herbert and Company, Inc.
100 East Pine Street, Suite 204
Orlando, FL. 32801
No. 99-2947
Date: March 16,2005
Original agreement amount..... ....... .......... ........ ....... ...... ........... ......... ................ .... ..$
Total of previous change orders.............. ....................... ............ .............. ............ ...$
This Change Order No.8 Amount ........................................................................$
Current Agreement Amount. .......... ........................................... ........ .................... $
1,195,190.00
225,457.75
119.772.00
1,540,419.75
Original contract time in calendar days .............................................................................. 730 days
Adjusted number of calendar days due to previous change orders................................... 1090 days
This change order adjusted time is......................................................................................287 days
Contract Tinle in working days ...................................................................................... 2107 days
Original Notice to Proceed date ................................................................................ August 8,2000
Completion date based on original contract time ..............................~...................... August 8, 2002
Revised completion date due to change order(s) ........................................................ May 16,2006
Your acceptance of this change order shall constitute a modification to our Agreement and will
be performed subject to all the same terms and conditions as contained in said Agreement
indicated above, as fully as if the same were repeated in this acceptance. The adjustment to this
Agreement shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims arising out of, or
related to, the change set h rei, including claims for impact and delay costs.
Prepared by: Date:~ 6
ose F. Delate, ASLA; Project Manger
Parks and Recreation Department
Accepted by:
Frank Bellomo, President
Bellom/~bert/nd Co~}'ny~~c.
Approved by: :_/1~~<:~
Murdo Smith, Interim Director
Parks and Recreation Department
Date:
Date: ~- /'r- c;:..f.
Agenda Item No. 1603
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 8
CHANGE ORDER NO.8
TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE FIRM OF
BELLOMO-HERBERT AND COMPANY, INC.
OF 100 EAST PINE STREET, ORLANDO, FL 32801
PROJECT: NORTH NAPLES REGIONAL PARK
NAPLES, FLORIDA
CONTRACT NO.: 99-2947
I. PURPOSE
This is an attachment to the Professional Services Agreement for Landscape Architectural Services
dated May 23, 2000 between the Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida
(COUNTY) and the finn of Bellomo-Herbert and Company, Inc. (LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) and
made a part thereof. The purpose of this Change Order is to specify the required additional services
of the LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
II. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK
The LANDSCAPE ARClllTECT shall provide the following additional services:
A. Provide extended Construction Administration services as required and appropriate for a 20
month construction period. Original estimated construction period (per our Agreement) was
6 months. ConstlUction administration involvement and fees from the LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT and appropriate sub-consultants is as follows:
1.
Landscape Architect:
. 22 additional site visits
. 12 months of additional shop drawing review, RFI's,
coordination of subs, correspondence, field directives,
change orders, product data review, construction field
reports (est. 5 hours per week)
Swimrninf? Pool Consultant:
. 10 additional site visits
. Additional submittal reviews
Civil Engineer:
. 3 months additional site visits
. Shop Drawing Review
Sub-total
$ 11,880.00
$ 3.120.00
$ 81,585.00
$ 23,100.00
$ 27,300.00
2.
$ 11,610.00
$ 4,575.00
3.
4.
B. Respond to 4 SFWMD Permit Modifications - Request for Additional Information (RAI) to
an original permit modification request (followed initial SFWMD Permit Modification
submittal paid for under Change Order No.7). Respond to 4 Collier County SDP
modifications (following initial modification submittal paid for under Change Order No.7)
including easement preparation, meeting with County staff, preparation of revised plans, and
re-submittals.
Agenda Item No. 1603
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 8
C. The COUNTY shall reimburse the LANDSCAPE ARCIDTECT for a permit fee for the
extension of the Consumptive Water Use Permit, previously paid by the LANDSCAPE
ARCHIECT.
D. In addition to the services described above, the COUNTY shall increase the reimbursable
expense budget for printing, CAD plotting, long distance telephone calls and express delivery
services.
III. SCHEDULES AND TIME CONSTRAINTS
The time required to complete the LANDSCAPE ARCIillECT'S services under this Change Order
shall extend the length of the aforementioned Professional Services Agreement by 287 days.
IV. COMPENSATION
Total compensation for all services, materials, supplies and any other requirements necessary to
complete the Change Order work as described herein shall be the lump sum of$119,772.00, broken
out as follows:
· Extended Construction Administration Services
· SFWMD - RAI Response/SDP Permit Modification
· Fee for Extension of the Consumptive Use Permit
· Reimbursable Expense Increase
$ 81,585.00
$ 28,187.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 9,000.00
TOTAL ADDITIONAL FEE
$119,772.00
Agenda Item No. 1603
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 8
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: IMPLEMENTATION OF A MASTER PLAN FOR NORTH NAPLES REGIONAL PARK.
PROJECT #: 80602
BIDIRFP #: 99-2947 MOD #: 8 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE: $119,772.00
PO #: 00-6510
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $1,195,190.00 CURRENT $1,540,419.75
(STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
Last BCC Approved Amount $1,365,722.75
(L.ASTTOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval: 6/24/2003 Agenda Item# 16(C)
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this Contract: $345,229.75
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount: +12.79%
Formula: (Current Amount I Last BCC approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.CA.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 818/2002 CURRENT: 5/16/2006
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
This Change Order #1 is to extend the length of construction observation services from the original
contract, additional permitting services, and a reimbursable expense budget Increase. Additionally,
time is being added to the contract to account for the longer construction schedule, with the project
now slated to be complete by May 16, 2006.
The original project scope anticipated a six (6) month project construction schedule. When Kraft
Construction was hired and a schedule was provided by them, the construction period had increased to
twenty (20) months as the construction had project grew in scale and scope from the original contract.
As a result, the design professional was required to provide an appropriate amount of services during
construction (site observation) that correlated to the increased construction timeline. As a result,
additional site visits and reviews were required by the design firm and their sub-consultants in the
amount of $81,585.
Additionally, an extra amount of permit modifications was required by the design process that was
outside the original scope of work and approved change orders, in the amount of $28,187. Additionally
the Consumptive Water Use Permit was required to be extended in the amount of $1,000, which was not
in the original scope of work. Also, due to the increased construction and design modification time,
additional reimbursable expenses in the amount of $9,000 are warranted by the design firm to cover
their direct expenses allowable by the contract
In order to provide the design firm with the adequate amount of time to correspond with the final
construction schedule, two hundred and eighty (287) days are being added to the project timellne via
this Change Order # 8 to account for the schedule.
Revised 12/23/04
Agenda Item No. 1603
May 10,2005
Page 8 of 8
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the project?
The addition of construction observation time and review allows the County to be guaranteed a quality
project and allows the consultant to be fairly compensated for his extra services. The additional
compensation for the permit modifications and water use permit allows the County to be compliant with
the permitted project and fairly compensates the consultant for his time. The additional reimbursable
expenses budget provides fair reimbursement for direct expenses as allowable by the contract The
additional time will ailow the consultant the necessary time to properly complete his services to the
project and for the County to construct the project.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Manage, Parks and Recreation Director,
Public Services Administrator, Purchasing Contract Specialist
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N1A)
Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
Y The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
Y Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
PROJECT MANAGER RECO~ON: This form Is to be signed and dated.
APPROVE By~<:r:f. Date: #('?-1.5'
oseph F. Delate, ASLA; Senior Project Manager I
REVIEWED BY: Date:
Linda Jackson, Contract Specialist
Revised 12/23/04
Agenda Item No. 1604
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
/"'_.,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve a budget amendment to recognize and
appropriate revenue of $18,035 for Domestic Animal Services.
OBJECTIVE: To purchase and procure additional disaster and hurricane preparedness
supplies and equipment.
CONSIDERATIONS: Domestic Animal Services recently received proceeds from a
Sheriffs sale of impounded cattle. The proceeds, totalling $18,035.03, were awarded by
the court to Domestic Animal Services for the holding, feeding and care of the
impounded cattle.
Staff recommends appropriating the proceeds to purchase and procure additional disaster
and hurricane preparedness supplies and equipment. Supplies and equipment to be
purchased will provide for better communications and preparedness for hurricanes and
disasters. Equipment to be purchased includes shop fans, portable animal cages, portable
emergency lights, extra radio batteries, rain gear, generators, and a tent.
,J6-.
FISCAL IMPACT: Approving this budget amendment will increase the FY 2004-05
Domestic Animal Services budget by $18,035.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: There is no growth management impact
associated with this Executive Summary.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve a budget
amendment to recognize and appropriate revenue of $18,035 for Domestic Animal
Services.
PREPARED BY: Cynthia A. Stasiewski Date: 4/18/2005
".-.'
Agenda Item No. 16D4
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
1604
Meeting Date
Recommendation to approve a budget amendment to recognize and appropriate revenue
of $18,035 for Domestic Animal Services,
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Cynthia Stasiewski
Administrative Assistant
4/19/200511:36:50 AM
Public Services
Domestic Animal Services
Approved By
Marla Ramsey
Parks & Recreation Director
Date
Public Services
Parks and Recreation
4/21/20052:26 PM
Approved By
Margo Castorena
Director
Date
Public Services
Domestic Animal Services
4/21/2005 2:37 PM
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General Svcs Director
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/22/2005 9:41 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4126120059:14 AM
Approved By
Gary A. Vincent
Management & Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/26/200510:37 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/27/20052:41 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4/27/20055:11 PM
Agenda Item No. 1605
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to waive the formal bid process and authorize rental of
trucks from Enterprise Rent A Car at an estimated cost of $40,000 for the
transportation of food to recreation and school sites under the Summer
Food Grant Program
Objective: To obtain cost-effective and reliable transportation for summer food
delivery.
Considerations: Collier County uses rental pick-up trucks to transport meals to school
and recreation summer camps throughout Collier County in conjunction with the Summer
Food Grant Program. Twenty-four vehicles are needed for nine weeks. Staff received
quotations from three vendors as follows:
Hertz
Avis
$181.95 per vehicle per week plus $2.32
state surcharge ($184.27 total)
$199.99 per vehicle per week
pick-up trucks are not available
Enterprise Rent A Car
In researching this purchase staff contacted the three vendors above by telephone and was
initially told by Hertz that full-size pick-ups were not available. In gathering
documentation of the same, staff received a quote from Hertz. As time now does not
permit for completion of a formal bid process prior to the date the trucks are needed, staff
is asking the Board to waive the formal bid process and authorize rental of trucks from
Enterprise.
Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost of $40,000 is reimbursable by the Summer Food
Grant Program, Fund 119-156342.
Growth Manaaement Impact: No Growth Management Impact is associated with
this action.
Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners waives the formal bid
process and authorizes rental of trucks from Enterprise Rent A Car for the Summer Food
Grant Program.
Prepared By: Amanda Townsend, Operations Analyst, Parks and Recreation
".......
Agenda Item No. 16D5
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 5
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
1605
Meeting Date
Recommendation to authorize rental of trucks from Enterprise Rent A Car at an estimated
cost of $40,000 for the transportation of food to recreation and school sites under the
Summer Food Grant Program.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Approved By
Kathy Carpenter
Executive Secretary
Date
Public Services
Public Services Admin.
4/11/20052:40 PM
Approved By
Murdo Smith
Beach and Water Superintendent
Date
Public Services
Parks and Recreation
4/19/2005 5:58 PM
Approved By
Marla Ramsey
Parks & Recreation Director
Date
Public Services
Parks and Recreation
4/21/2005 2:38 PM
Approved By
Brenda Brilhart
Purchasing Agent
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/26/200512:29 PM
Approved By
Mike Hauer
Acquisition Manager
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/26/20054:11 PM
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General Svcs Director
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/27/2005 11 :18 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/28/20054:14 PM
Approved By
Gary A. Vincent
Management & Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/200510:11 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 11 :52 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4/29/2005 4:23 PM
Agenda Item No. 1605
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 5
Gl!i1Jo
it II~ /05
Tile Hertz Corporation
550 Terminal Dn' N.
Te/e(l"one: (941)~4:~~~FL 34104
Fax. (941)643-1817
~w~
~
~eu.u.J :
(h fW'- iW-Q &vJJJJ.-O~.w... tV~ -S~~.
~ +L- ~ "t j. C{ ~ hvd'5..fol.- tJ ~.
~ OJJ-;:
~ '3'1.9't
IQ'1. q'!
I ot 9. q '1
-tL- ~ (}JJ.- ~ ~.
f~ ~ L ~o.J- ~ oJ-~ k
SW Florida Locations:
Marco island Nat}!es.
Fort Myers. Cape Co"'"
Borum Sprmgs
L~Edition"
Alexandra Roman
Branch Manager
Bonita $ormgs/Norrh Naples
Rilz-Carfton Beach & Go/f Resorrs
13500 N. 18m/am! Tr. '" 13
Naples. FL 33/70
Telephone: (239) 5/3-1838. ext. 125
Fax. (239) 574-4378
Hertz rents Fonts and other fine cars
PJH Car Rental, Inc.
Agf3ncy OperalOl
NAPLES AIRPORT
570 T ermin,-al Drive
Naplos, Flcricta 34104
Tet (239) 643.4013
Fax: (239i 643-9752
AVIS.
- OV ~ (l... -
Agenda Item No. 1605
May 10, 2005
Page 4 .of Q'
PAULA J. HAUKE
PreSIdent
We try harder~
\JJ.R kV1lR nO ~3
"--
,,",,
I
I
1
I~
(1b
a4/14/2ee5 15:1e 2396437578
ENTERPRISE 3514
PAGE 62
Agenda Item No. 1605
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 5
~i., .
...'-," --- - --- 1
COLLIER COUNTY PARKS & REC
ANNUAL FOOD DRIVE SUMJMER 2005
PROPOSAL
2.tt FULLSIZE PICKUP TRUCKS ,(Q; 181.9SIWEEK/ ];"..,e Jc
. . .
.-
"
~.' ..
..... . .
-:... :~:.:.; ~ - .:;:.
..... <--~. _:"..
- ..: ".".. -
.1
- ,
:.~'.,..~ .........-
,'"to .. ""
. ., i
Agenda Item No. 16E1
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve a budget amendment to recognize revenues and
appropriate expenditures in the Purchasing Department budget
OBJECTIVE: To recognize revenues in excess of the current budgeted amount and
appropriate funds needed for the operation of the Purchasing Department.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Purchasing Department is responsible for the delivery and
pick up of U.S. mail and interoffice mail to most County offices located at the
Government Center and Horseshoe Drive. In recent months, the Department has been
evaluating different methods to improve the security and timeliness of mail delivery. To
this end, the Department is pursuing various initiatives, including the installation of
secured mail storage bins on the mail delivery vehicles, "machine counting" the total
number of pieces processed daily, carrying smaller volumes of mail on each delivery run
and "machine sealing" all mail prior to exiting the Mail Center.
-
In order to implement all of these initiatives, additional funds are needed to purchase a
mail machine that will mechanically seal and count all of the daily mail volume. The
current year budget includes a $4,200 revenue appropriation for the sale of bid
documents. As of the end of March, more than $6,000 in revenue has been received.
Accordingly, staff recommends that the Board approve amending the department budget
to increase the budgeted revenue amount to $10,200 and increase appropriations in the
amount of $6,000 to pay for the acquisition of the recommended machine.
FISCAL IMPACT: The associated revenues and expenses are credited and debited
within the Department's administrative cost center.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no direct impact on the growth
management plan resulting from this action.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approves the
enclosed budget amendment to recognize additional revenues and appropriate
additional funds for the purchase of mail sealing and counting equipment.
PREPARED BY: Greer White, Administrative Assistant, Purchasing Department
",.-
Agenda Item No. 16E1
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16E1
Meeting Date
Recommendation to approve a budget amendment to recognize revenues and appropriate
expenditures in the Purchasing Department budget.
5/10/2005 9:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Greer White
Administrative Assistant
4/22/20054:16:26 PM
Administrative Services
Purchasing
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General Svcs Director
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/25/2005 11 :48 AM
Approved By
Mary Beck
Executive Secretary
Date
Administrative Services
Administrative Services Admin.
4/25/2005 1 :45 PM
Approved By
Len Golden Price
Administrative Services Administrator
Date
Administrative Services
Administrative Services Admin.
4/26/2005 11 :51 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/28/2005 4:39 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/28/2005 8:50 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/29/2005 8:36 AM
Agenda Item No. 16E2
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve conveyance of an Easement to Florida Power & Light
Company (FPL) in order for it to provide electric power to the new North Naples
Government Center, located on Orange Blossom Drive immediately west of the main
Library, at a cost not to exceed $18.50, Project Number 52534.
OBJECTIVE: To secure Board of County Commissioners' (Board) approval and execution
of the attached Easement.
CONSIDERATION: The Board approved construction of North Naples Government
Center at its July 27, 2004 meeting under Item ION. The facility is now under construction
and in order for FPL to provide electric power to the Center, grant of the attached Easement
is required.
The easement area measures 10 feet in width; measures approximately 1,180 feet in length;
contains 0.271 acres, more or less; and is shown and described on Exhibit "A" to the
Easement. Real Estate Services' staff Appraiser valued the easement area at $18,000. The
County will not be compensated, as the easement grant is a requirement of FPL providing
service to the Center.
-,
The Easement document has been reviewed and approved by the Facilities Management
Department and the County Attorney's Office.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of this transaction will be $ 18.50 for recording of the
Easement. Funding is available in Government Facilities Impact Fee Fund (390).
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: This project is consistent with the Growth
Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Approve the attached Easement; and
2. Authorize Chairman Coyle to execute the Easement on behalf ofthe Board; and
3. Authorize staff to record the Easement with the Clerk of Courts in the Public
Records of Collier County, Florida.
PREPARED BY:
Toni A. Mott, Manager, Property Acquisition & Sales
Real Estate Services / Facilities Management Department
,-
Agenda Item No. 16E2
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16E2
Meeting Date
Recommendation to approve conveyance of an Easement to Florida Power & Light
Company (FPL) in order for it to provide electric power to the new North Naples
Government Center, located on Orange Blossom Orive immediately west of the main
Library, at a cost not to exceed $18.50, Project Number 52534,
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Toni A. Mott
Real Property Supervisor
4/21/2005 11 :25:29 AM
Administrative Services
Facilities Management
Approved By
Peter S. Hayden, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
Date
Administrative Services
Facilities Management
4/21/2005 11 :49 AM
Approved By
Charles E. Carrington, Jr.,
SRfWA
Real Estate Services Manager
Date
Administrative Services
Facilities Management
4/21/20051:53 PM
Approved By
Skip Camp, C.F.M.
Facilities Management Director
Date
Administrative Services
Facilities Management
4/21/2005 2:23 PM
Approved By
Len Golden Price
Administrative Services Administrator
Date
Administrative Services
Administrative Services Admin.
4/26/2005 11 :49 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/28/2005 4:27 PM
Approved By
Susan Usher
Senior Management/Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/200510:47 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 12: 11 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/30/200512:30 PM
EASEMENT
Form 3722-A (Stocked) Rev.7/94
Agenda Item No. 16E2
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 4
Work Order No. 965652
Prepared By:
Name: Anne Harris
Co. Name: FP&L Co.
Address: 4105 S.W. 15th.Ave.
Naples, FI. 34116
Sec. 02, Twp. 49, Rge. 25.
Parcel J.D. 00236800003
(Maintained by Property Appraiser)
The undersigned, in consideration of the payment of $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. grant and give to Florida Power & Light Company, its licensees, agents,
successors, and assigns, an easement forever for the construction, operation and maintenance of overhead and underground
electric utility facilities (including wires. poles, guys, cables, conduits and appurtenant equipment) to be installed from time
to time; with the right to reconstruct, improve, add to, enlarge, change the voltage, as well as, the size of and remove such
facilities or any of them within an easement 10 feet in width, described as follows:
An FP&L Company easement more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part
hereof. Said legal description and sketch prepared by David S. Dagostino of Dagostino & Wood, Inc.
Together with the right to permit any other person, firm or corporation to attach wires to any facilities hereunder and lay
cable and conduit within the easement and to operate the same for communications purposes; the right of ingress and
egress to said premises at all times; the right to clear the land and keep it cleared of all trees, undergrowth and other
obstructions within the easement area; to trim and cut and keep trimmed and cut all dead, weak, leaning or dangerous trees
or limbs outside of the easement area which might interfere with or fall upon the lines or systems of communications or
power transmission or distribution: and further grants, to the fullest extent the undersigned has the power to grant, if at all,
the rights hereinabove granted on the land heretofore described. over, along, under and across the roads. streets or
highways adjoining or through said property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the undersigned has signed and sealed this instrument on this _ day of
.2005.
Board of County Commissioners
Collier County. Florida
By:
Fred W. Coyle, Chairman
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
Attest:
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
3301 Tamiami Trial East
Naples, Florida 34112
Approved as to form and
LeKq,sufficiency: a
_' Iff" ~ L1 "t~
Ellen T. ChadweJ/. Assistant County Attorney
...Qol L() -.:t
~o
.'1 -.:t
'0 Q)
0..- O'l
Z >.ro
Ero!l.
~~
ro
"0
c
Q)
O'l
<(
~~
!!!1
::I: CD
XC)
W~
~.~-;
lil ~.
v. l.c
~"~i !
~-~. --
..,
~
I~
~~~
~J~
iri
il~~
~~
~it
~~
~
. -- ~
i :1 i,,~ ~~ i!lIg~~~~ S
e.~ f'- i!18~. 8 a
I ;!~ ~~~r';~~li; !
j ~n ~i~!h~ai~ Ii
I iSd ~ 1!l'l'lIa~_t: ~
jai ~ih~l~~~1 i
:, iI! llil!!:;:ll' I
I ~~i ea!'lI\i!'-a~1!l a _
'I '1!1 :ii'l:i@th~ ~ !
~ 'I ~;~ ~~:li: ~~~Sll ~ !'
6~1 ~:r~h - ~. Ii! ~ II
g"'", hhl1!~hi~ ~ 9 ~
: ill ~111~!m!: I i I
I i!~ hlli@~~I~ t ~ i!'
~~II~~~~~~ ~h Ii ~ t
~ ~!a ;!~~~:~~i~i ! ~ i~
I m I!i!mli:lll ~:
Agenda Item No. 16E3
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
-"'
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the utilization of State contracts for purchases of furniture
and floor coverings over twenty-five thousand dollars.
OBJECTIVE: To seek Board approval to utilize State Contract pricing for capital projects and
operating budgets for a twenty-four (24) month period.
CONSIDERATIONS: The County will require furniture and floor covering for multiple Board
approved capital projects (Sheriffs Jail Addition, North Naples Satellite Government Center,
County Courthouse Annex and others) in the next thirty-six (36) months. Additionally, some
operating departments may also require these commodities. The State of Florida has formally
and competitively bid these items making the discounted pricing available to local governments.
The County's Purchasing Policy provides for the utilization of these contracts, but purchases in
excess of $25,000 require Board approval. Hence, staff is requesting approval to purchase
furniture and floor covering through State contracts for a period of two years. Under this
recommendation, purchases are not to exceed the appropriation for each project or operating cost
center.
FISCAL IMP ACT: Funds are budgeted in each project and / or operating cost center.
--
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: There is no growth management impact associated
with this request.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve staffs recommendation to purchase State
Contract commodities over twenty-five thousand dollars as addressed within this executive
summary.
PREPARED BY: Skip Camp, CFM, Director of Facilities Management
,"--"
Agenda Item No. 16E3
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16E3
Meeting Date
Recommendation to approve the utilization of State contracts for purchases of furniture
and floor coverings over twenty-five thousand dollars,
5/10/2005 900:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Skip Camp, C.F.M.
Facilities Management Director
4/26/200512:43:31 PM
Administrative Services
Facilities Management
Approved By
Skip Camp, C.F.M.
Facilities Management Director
Date
Administrative Services
Facilities Management
4126/200512:56 PM
Approved By
Scott Johnson
Purchasing Agent
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/26/2005 2:48 PM
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General Svcs Director
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4126/2005 4:02 PM
Approved By
Daniel R. Rodriguez, M.B.A.
Facilities Manager
Date
Administrative Services
Facilities Management
4/271200510:22 AM
Approved By
Len Golden Price
Administrative Services Administrator
Date
Administrative Services
Administrative Services Admin.
4/28/20a5 8:50 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/20057:47 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/200511:46 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/29/20054:14 PM
Agenda Item No. 16E4
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 57
...--
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Report and ratify staff-approved change orders and changes to work orders to Board-
approved contracts
OBJECTIVE: To enable the Board to oversee the execution of administrative change orders
and changes to work orders, and promote accountability in the use of staff authority.
CONSIDERATIONS: On April 22, 2003, the Board approved a recommendation to implement
a plan to enable changes to BCC-approved contracts (Section XIV. C, Collier County
Purchasing Policy) of not greater than 10 percent of the current Board approved amount or
$10,000 (whichever is greater) to be authorized by staff. Also included in the report are changes
to Work Orders. These include work orders issued under CCNA Contracts, which are less than
or equal to $90,000 (Section VII.C, Collier County Purchasing Policy), and changes to work
orders for all other contracts (Section XIV. G, Collier County Purchasing Policy) which are not
greater than 10 percent of the current Board Approved amount or $100,000 whichever is
greater. The Administrative report identifies the percentage changes to contracts or work orders
that have occurred since the amount most recently approved by the BCC, which are below the
threshold limits as referenced above.
,-..
The plan calls for staff to submit a monthly report listing these change orders from the previous
reporting period. Enclosed is the monthly report of the Administrative Change Order and
Administrative Changes to Work Order Reports. These reports cover the period of March 31,
2005 through April 25, 2005.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact resulting from this action.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact associated with
this action.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners accepts the enclosed
Administrative Change Order and Administrative Changes to Work Orders Report and ratifies
the listed change orders and changes to work orders
PREPARED BY: Brenda Reaves, Contract Technician, Purchasing Department
".-..
Agenda Item No. 16E4
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 57
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16E4
Report and ratify staff-approved change orders and changes to work orders to Board-
approved contracts.
Meeting Date
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Approved By
Linda Jackson Contracts Agent Date
Administrative Services Purchasing 4/26/2005 4:56 PM
Approved By
Steve Carnell Purchasing/General Svcs Director Date
Administrative Services Purchasing 4/27/20057:57 AM
Approved By
Mary Beck Executive Secretary Date
Administrative Services Administrative Services Admin. 4/27/200510:14 AM
Approved By
Len Golden Price Administrative Services Administrator Date
Administrative Services Administrative Services Admin. 4/28/20058:53 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator Administrative Assistant Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 4/29/20057:49 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski Management & Budget Director Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 5/3/2005 4:07 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd County Manager Date
Board of County
Commissioners County Manager's Office 5/4/2005 8:40 AM
'<:tL.(')r--
lli8~
.,....NO
00""
Z"-~
E ~ctl
2~a.
ctl
'0
C
C1>
Cl
-<
In
o
it...
c ..
Gl ! ~ C
QJ ... ... :::J
~lia~~
..e E .. c(
CJ 0 0...
.::~
'E
ca
o
III
Gl
==
.2
"
oS
C
Gl
III
Gl
~
iii
Gl.E ~ c
~~.g'O~
caOt!E
c3Eoc(
,g~'"
..
Gl c
"C"E;:,
III 0 0
'> t! .s
Gl 0 ....
a::~...
,S ~ C
QI .. :l
al 0 0
lit!~
..e 0
CJ~'"
..
Gl C
c "E ~
~ 0 0
:It!~
CJ~...
..
Gl C
! 'E ::I
._ 0 0
.21 t! E
" 0 c(
~...
....
a::
o
11.
W
II::
I/)
a::
w
Q
a::
o
lll::
a::
~
o
....
I/)
w
(!)
z
c(
:J:
CJ
W
>
i=
~
....
I/)
Z
:i
Q
c(
...
C
Gl
E
1::
ca
l:I.
l!
o
z
... 0
Glz
'Et;
~ l!
"'c
o 0
~CJ
o
Z
lU ; It
~~5~
~t>&t>
'tIGlCQI
; 'f' ~ oe-
>I1.CJI1.
Gl
n;
o
E
~~
'#.
Ol
V
a;
'#.
N
Ol
('oj
...
o
o
c::i
o
...
r-:
N
~
o
o
c::i
ll'>
M
N
~
o
o
c::i
ll'>
,..
...t
N
~
o
o
c::i
o
o
...t
N
~
III
Ol
~
'U
00....,
u......J
N
Oll'>
'M
NN
9""'
(fl~
(fl0
!:i
'3
.<=
U
(fl
Qi
-'"
Cv
OlO
'<=0
UN
I/)ll'>
Ol
III
:::J
o
.<=
'!:
:::J
Ol 0
R';;;
<1l C
N u...2
Q,) .... TO
g.~ Ei
~x~
UUJa::
ll'>
o
~
e
v
o
Ql
'0
o
U
~
i.i:
Ol
:S
'0
C
o
ts
~
'6
Ol
:S
Q;
Q.
III
Cl
~
.~
Ol
:S
'0
Ql
'0
~
Cl
Q.
:::J
Ol
:S
...
J2
III
fl
C
~
.2!
~
C .,;
00
~~
!EO
u""'
~~
III :::J
'0....,
g.8
III Ol
g> .E
.~ ~
~ .2
'OQi
Ole.
:!2 E
e 8
Q.ti
.8 Ol
III '12'
B Q.
.~ ~
Ill....
10 ~
C 0
~ '(i5
is c:
'0 Ol
<1l X
III Ol
'0 Ol
~=
.!!l
Ol ...
~~
Ol 0
ClOl
C Cl
<1l C
-5~
III U
:c In
....;5
,~
..'0
Gl Ol
",'0
;-5
..e C
u ,-
o~
~ <
Gl
.~ ~
~lE
00
.,.e.
o
o
c::i
.,.e.
o
o
c::i
o
o
c::i
N
~
...
v
,..
~
o
o
c::i
....
o
o
c::i
N
~
:;;
,..
....
o
o
c::i
N
~
...
v
,..
~
o
~~
11.....J
M
o
~Ol
f--
u..-
.""'
(fl'
:c8
Q;
i;j
... ~~
f 0:B_
~ a:~~
.., ~~&~
CMCl~~>
Oloca::Q.12
~~~u~c.
:C",UZ(fl.5
'"
o
<C
o
~
o
N
~
.
o
o
c::i
-0
S
<1l
Q.
'u
:;::l
C
<1l
~
10
C
'0>
'C
o
C
<1l
:S
Ol
E
:;::l
~
o
E
Cl
C
'C
'S
e
Cl
C
:a
'E
Q;
Q.
'0
C
<1l
C
~
'Cij
'S
8'
<1l
'E
Ql
E
Ol
III
<ll
Ol
.8
Ol
:::J
'0
Q;
'0
o
~
~
C
o
Ol
~
'0
C
Ol
X
Ol
.8
...
Ol
1:
o
Ol
Cl
C
<1l
.<=
U
u;
8
o
Z
~
o
,..
Ol
('oj
o
v
c::i
,..
,..
,..-
v
~
o
o
c::i
....
o
v
c::i
,..
,..
,..-
v
~
o
v
c::i
Ol
C"l
<Ii
v
(,It
C
.2
~
o
Q.
'"
C
~a::
f-a::
C"l
9
M
9
0....
0C"l
~~
~g
~C~
~ -B~&
~ ~ :f ~ Cl
"C <(-:~.5
~ N~.EE~
Ol-Ol[S"'.5c
'Oll'>Cl",B~:::J
.- co c: ""C .- "'C 0
S'?~c:~~U
oguj(fla::.8
Qj
'"
C
ca
..e
u
....
o
~
Gl
.~
~
o
'"
o
;::
~
C"l
'0
l!!
'0
C
:::J
J::
5
.E
.8
'0
~
'C
<ll
'l3
c
Ol
Ql
.0
'"
00
.<=
C
o
'fl
2
u;
c
8
...
.E
S
00
'0
c
.2
Qi
e.
E
8
~ c::
f- 0
'fl
~.E
o '"
N C
as 8
... ....
>,0
<ll C
:iE .2
~~
S E
,g 8
C Ql
o :S
:.= ....
~s
ES
8,g
10 00
co?:-
It:: '(:5
Ol Ql
:S Q.
III III
~o
,S!! ~
:E:c
~ Q;
~ 1:
Ql 0
1:~
o 0
Ql ;C
Cl _
C 00
00 C
'fi :g
III 0
:.2 Q.)
f-.<=
f-
~
Qj 00
c'O
OliO
..ell'>
u~
'0 Ql
~~
.~ i
~'O
o g
'<!'Lnl"'-
~8~
NO
-'<!'
.,0
Z..-a>
Cl
E ~[tl
~:Ea..
[tl
'0
C
a>
Cl
4:
'"
o
~N
"E ; ...
& ~ 'E! 5
-.!' C :lI 0 0
.- III CJ of E
<3Eo<
~:t'"
'E!
III
o
II)
~
S
'tl
Jl
c
OIl
III
e!
II.
ii ..
1I.5~c
g'!,,~
~llIoofE
<3Eo<
~:t'"
"C~c
III .. :lI
III 0 0
't of .a
a:~...
sic
III .. :lI
ClO 0
liiof~
.::. 0
CJ:t'"
..
II C
c'E! :lI
~ 0 ~
:lIof<
CJ~...
...
ii~c
.5" ~
'~i!: ~
O~...
Ii:
o
II.
w
a:
I/)
a:
w
Q
a:
o
~
a:
o
:t
~
I/)
w
Cl
Z
<
:r
CJ
w
>
~
l-
I/)
Z
!E
Q
<
C
II
~
III
a.
!
o
z
... 0
IIlZ
"et)
o f!
~c
:t8
o
Z
QI ; fU
e 0 'E! e
~zO~
~ .. G,t ...
o CJ l:Il CJ
-g.~lif
1t..J:.~
>II.CJII.
III
i&
Q
e
l!:i
<l-
N
'"
-i
.,.
CO
Cl
N
8
Ii'i
Cl
CO
~
....
o
o
~
o.
0;
o
o
Ii'i
CO
CO
..;
t')
ut
o
o
Ii'i
CO
t')
..;
t')
ut
'"
(l)
~
'0
<II..,
LJ..-1
'o:t
Cj>'"
Nt')
ON
,t')
<'
00
'"
(l)
m ~
'0 ,g
5l <II LJ..
~ i;C)
OI!S I: .5
>- &!~
~ CIla:l
is ~~c:
~;; ~~ ~
l6g~.92=
O",UU",
'"
Q
....
o
g
'o:t
!!
~:
<II 0
_ c:
~J
.!2 'E
"'.0
Cl:;)
~ %
'" ....
'E -g
.a <II
! 0
~~
.- 0
CI):';:;
5 ~
:?1l !5
~ ~
.e <II
~]
'0 .-
1Il 5-
~ 2!
'fi~
:E <II
~ '5
s~
~-
s ;
c:o.
<11_
o.~
~fj
fj.9!
.9! III
Ill!
Ill-
~.s
'0 ~
Cl<E!
.S ll!
4::'1jl
ll! III
'1jl ..
~~
.!!! <II
'l:: c.
[!
-g~
<II ~
~~
,Q ~
.~ .2
2! 3
~ ~ .
8> -g C
<ll III
III - E
Cl~C.
ffifj~
'fi III ili
",QjO
:EJ:~
I- 'i 'g
.. ~ ~
III <ll 0
c's U
llI'Eo
'fi 8;;
'0 - E
II: ~ :g,
.1 ~ g>
~ "':2
~~]
<I-
'o:t
CO
9
.,.
'o:t
co
9
o
o
c:i
CO
"".
....
Cl
....
....
s
o
c:i
N
(0.
....
~
8
c:i
o
o
..;
Cl
;;;
o
o
c:i
o
o
..;
Cl
....
....
o
UJ
~J
",'"
(")(")
017
::l;g
..
.S!
~
~
~ LJ..
.s! .... (l. '"
:f::&~~
. N c: 0::: ll!
:z;02ug
O;::UCIl::l
'"
o
N
~
'"
'"
8
N
Il'i
N
~
III
2
.0
III
LJ..
.e
tS
III
'e-
0.
(l)
-=
'0
c:
.Q
a;
0.
E
8
~
c:
q:::
III
-=
'0
III
'0
c:
~
Ql
'0
C
to
~
'C
$
to
E
III
>
~
>
.s
III
Cl
C
<ll
J:
"
<ll
....
S
....
.e
"
ll!
C
8
III
-=
>-
.0
'0
l!1
~
o
-
'ii
l!1
"
<ll
'"
~s
JS! 'ii.j
III Ql
ClJ:
c: -
~m
" '"
'" c
:E .Q
I-~
0.
Gi ~
c C
III III
'fi $
'0 l!1
II:-@
.~ ~
~~
<I-
Cl
Cl
Ii'i
<I-
Cl
Cl
Ii'i
o
o
c:i
N
CO
......
....
....
o
o
g
'o:t
-i
....
o
o
c:i
N
'o:t
..;
....
....
o
o
c:i
N
'o:t
..;
....
....
..
.sa
to
~
E
.eo:::
CIlo:::
CO'"
....t")
oil>
,t")
U'
::l;g
'0
to
~c
~ J: EIll
s'l::lll
'" '0 ~ e
.s C l!! 0.
g ....eO,5
'-NIII e>tl't:
J:Cl g>(l) I!! III
.0<ll'OC>
:Z;'o:tJ:c8'3
o:l;U::l U
'"
~
;a:
o
(0
(I)
:E
I-
-'
C
III
E
III
!
~
'0
III
Cl
'0
(l)
III
-=
II:
o
:g,
o
u;
~
'5
o
c
~
<ll
Q::
.e
1
(l)
.::.
'0
.9!
S
'"
.s
!
Cl
c:
:=
<ll
>
III
Qj
'0
$
o
e-
:;)
c.
~
....
S
tS
~~
8J!
Ql lJl
;;~
.e <II
(I) e
-g Ql
.a=
(I) III
'0 >
'0 e
<ll c.
~ .E
'E-g
o <ll
&5
c: ._
-5 e
"'~
~ 'g
2!
Gi~
CC
! ~
CJ l!1
...0.
0=
.~ ~
~J:
~~
'<1' J.() r--
UJOJ.()
c.oO_
......NO
06J.()
z......Q>
Eial6'
:m~a.
ro
"0
c:
Q>
OJ
<!
U'>
o
~M
c :.;
Gl~'OC
~o ~=O S
III U.lIC E
J:E-cC
uo~...
':::00
'E
III
o
III
Gl
==
S
'0
S
C
.
III
.
0:
~ Gl
I)'-"'E
~to S
~IlIO.llCE
.cE-cC
Uo~...
,j:
..
Gl C
'O'E=
8: 0 0
'> of .s
.0....
1I::;r:...
.s~c
Gl - =
=0 0
fiofE
.cocC
u;r:'"
-
Gl C
.c: 'E :s
~ 0 0
=of~
u~...
-
- ~ c
1.50 S
'~of ~
o~...
....
II::
o
~
w
II::
I/)
II::
w
Q
II::
o
~
II::
o
:r:
o
....
I/)
w
<.:l
z
~
u
w
C!:
g
I/)
Z
:E
Q
cC
-
C
Gl
e
III
Q,
c!l
o
z
.. 0
~~
.. U
~ l!
o c
:r:8
o
z
G,) i at
E 'E E
~~o~
.. .... 4D ...
OUQlU
"CI Gl C Gl
;~~e'
>~u~
J!!
III
Q
~ 0
=z
~
o
co
I.l'l
....:
~
~
o
I.l'l
C"J
N
~
o
o
~
~
,..:
o
N
<>It
5'
o
cxi
co
~
a>
N
!!!.
o
o
o
to
C"J
ui
(")
N
...
o
o
o
to
"'l.
~
I.l'l
N
<It
:::!:o::
!;to::
M
o
;g
ch
~
..J
u.
~
f-
<(
<:
o
ti
2
in
<:
o
U
Gl
<II
:>
o
.c
..0
:>
[i
lI) a;
~ ~
N co III
Qi Gl ..J (J)
~~g'Cii~
.s~~~.8
~(")Uu-(J)
""
Oi
en
I.l'l
o
it;
~
~
o
....
I.l'l
(")
I.l'l
(")
~
"CI
<:
co
lI)
>.
III Ol
Qi.c
"CIf-
Ol ,
C "CI
r3 ~
.'" :>
~e
'0 ~
Gl
'3 ~
lI) lI)
~~
III 'E
lI) co
III :>
a; C"
~ .~
-/::"CI
o ll!
~ 'i"
Gl ~
.c Gl
-;ro
- ~
"CI(J)
-8-g
~ III
!I!~
Glu
~o::
lI)~
>'Gl
~,~
o 0.
to Gl
~'1ii
'0 ts
_ c
~ 8
-"CI
<( ~
LriJ2
o c
~ 'e1
0)":
~ Ol
1::2
c.:>
<(U-
.8::;
Glf-
1ij(J)
"CI:::!:
~~
Gl_
0.0
E Gl
8~
iii E
~ ~ .~
,s ~ ~
lI) 0 <II
Gl lI)
.~ ~ 8
~ <( m
d>~~
~Et;
l!l,,g :::!:
ffi"5~
-5 .~-g
:2 ~~>
f- 'c 0
I9 5-
..0 lI)
~ 0 E
.5 ~
; ~ ~
.c ~ Q.l
l.l Gl.c
O~'i5
~ Gl C
4t ~ .Q
~ ~ u
~S-5
o 5 e
'#.
o
o
o
'#.
o
o
o
I.l'l
....
cxi
....
co.
N
...
o
o
o
<It
I.l'l
....
cxi
....
~
~
N
<It
I.l'l
....
cxi
....
co.
~
N
<It
c
o
""
co
t::
o
0.
'"
c
ll!o::
....0::
~
9
I.l'l
o
ti:f:
, (")
w(")
~~
!!!
Gl
Gl
c
'6>
c
w
>.
co
III
III
0.
E<(
~z
~ ~
C III
~ lI) ai
B E.5
t: S "'
8 ~:::!: ~
c (J) all :>
.S2c:ci
~EE'fi
GlOGlo.(J)
Olo.Ol.Qu
i~~~.~
t5~~~l
I.l'l
o
a;
~
~
o
co
Il::al .
-m .~ ,~~
>.~Eo.
'E~>.E
5 ~ 16 8
<..) lI) ~ !?
g>5~~
~ ~.~ ~
~s.-m,g
E"CI"CI'"
~ 16 .s ~
III ~ ~ ~
'O,g~,s
Ol~~:E
lI) 0 0 c
~~'5i;;:
:3t'~.:.:.
c.. 0 .... (I)
~ fr ~ .l9
::0::31'E
S ~11l!
ts.9:cn
~i~~
c ~.~ sa
8J!!"CI"CI
Gl co "CI ~
:5"8.~~
;=e~
~ ~ ~ ~
o '" 0_
E <( "" C
Gl~,!g
m..c:t=~
'=-0(1)
~~~8
=g .c I1l
~E=~
~.~ ~ ~
)('--~
'(i) E ~ c:
"CI E ~ !!l
~8~f6
'i g> f- .2
UJ 'g ~ ~
~~~~
...;"CI-1:1
o coo
o Ill''''
N1:1~~
":lIlfl~
u;~Ct.lcti
5, ~ -g .g,
~ I- : 'g en
.sui.g.4)~
Q)~-:5{ij
~:5~~i3
~ ~ ~ .~_ 0
c :;,..:::c'~
~S,s5>.
Gl'OI5-t:'"
mcvNoCl)
"EcuU'J~~
o~~o'~
~~~~~
~:5~8E
~E~~:2
:2 e-="O
f-Gl!!!o~
;,~~,g
u.E.!!2rg~
'1ii ~ ~ 0
fio.iiiQ~
'fi ~ ~ ~ ~
-0 (l) ~ =
.s ;; ~ 0
~~.~~~
'E:fi'EOJ~
~~~~~
o'C~'fif-
o
~
...;
00
(")
~
....
<It
o
o
o
<It
o
~
...;
00
(")
~
....
...
o
~
...;
co
(")
~
....
<It
:::!:o::
!;to::
~
9
II)
90
tal
, N
11I(")
III'
<(0
>.
Gl co
Ol :t
<0 C
"CI I1l
'" ~
~ "
all ~
a; 0
€ ~
III ~ Gl
III Gl iii
:os ~ ~~
'" 0 III E
OlO.c E
<(tOU_
It)
!;2
~
~
o
al
'#.
o
o
o
'#.
g
o
co
III
>
co
.c
'i
1ij
,s
lI)
J!!
ll!
>.
III
0.
"CI
c:
co
lI)
c
,2
1ij
U
""
'iJj
lI)
co
'0
Qi
c
c
o
!!!
Gl
0.
Gl
~
,s
Ol
c
'C
-0
III
'0
Gl
lI)
o
0.
5
0.
Q)
,s
....
S
It)
o
o
N
a>
N
Gl
'"
:0
...,
.8
2
III
-0
C
o
~
0.
E
8
iii
c
""
Q)
,s
'"
"CI
C
~ 'E
Gl 5
~ E
1:1 co
o u
Gl ll!
g'1::
co 8
'fi-
ll) .l9
:C.8
f- Gl
,s
C
o
U
~
Gl
~
15
"CI
E!
~
'1ii
c
-.;t1.C:lr--
~8~
NO
~citD
Z"-~
E ~II]
~::2o..
II]
"0
C
Q)
C'l
<(
III
o
~...
c;...
CD ~ "E! S
~::1 0 0
~OS(,).llCE
,cE"o(
(,)00...
01:;=
"E!
os
o
!XI
CD
:5
:!
"CI
CD
C
CD
1/1
l!!
Q.
iii ..
CD.5~c
cn.2l..::1
~i5~~
,cE"o(
(,) 0 ...
,g;=
..
CD -
"CI "E! s
:= 0 0
'> of ~
&~...
o ~ c
&5 6
C of E
.!oo(
(,);=...
Q; 1:
c"E!::1
~ 0 0
::Iof.l
(,)~...
..
CD -
iii "CI C
.55 6
.~ of ~
o~...
~
o
Q.
W
0::
UI
0::
W
Q
0::
o
lI::
0::
o
;=
o
I-
UI
W
Cl
Z
0(
:I:
(,)
W
>
~
I-
UI
Z
:E
Q
0(
c
CD
f
..
Cl.
~
o
Z
.. Q
CDZ
"E!-
o ~
~-s
o Q
;=(,)
Q
Z
CD ..
E ~ ~
:!~5:!
oti8.u
11 .!!. Ii .t!.
cues=2
>Q.(,)Q.
~
Q
E
~~
.,.
~
N
.,.
00
'"
N
o
o
ci
~
~
o
o
ci
o
00
....
o
o
ci
V
<0
ri
....
o
o
ci
(2j
ri
....
C
,12
""iii
III Ql
i!: t;
~~:J
9
M
9_
~~
g:g
I"-
'ill
III III
'" ~
1J ~c(
.~ c( .c
o 15 ~
~ ~~
NCC=,=,
': Ql;C-€
Ql~g>,[~
~g~<'Jfij
:;",UCC>
III
o
en
~
o
-
'ti
1ll
I:
8
i5
::I
I:
I:
11I
~
.5
.c
t::
.e
Q;
III
III
11I
III
E
.l!!
~
.s
0>
I:
'E
@
11I
'0
2l
'0
>
.5 -.:i
e .!!
~ ~
.c CIl
() C-
:E E
;c 8
$>-
C 'l:
~:e
::; Ql
III ..e
c .s
8'0
~~
.s~
~ .~
III I:
~s
ir::;
Ql ~
1l 8
11I CIl
~ :;.
..e ..
,5 ~
l!! 0
~~
~ ;c
e i5
C- .5
.. 0>
CIl'1:
'0 0
(;; Ql
Ql :;
g>.s
11I c
,c ,-
(,,) ~
'" ::I
:E..e
1-(5
c
l!!
CD ~
C ~
.!:o
l.l 11I
'0 ~
! ~
.~ .~
~ Ql
Ot=
.,.
-
M
Il'i
-
.,.
....
M
Il'i
-
o
o
Il'i
~
<Ii
....
o
o
ci
o
00
....
o
o
Il'i
N
N
on
....
o
o
Il'i
N
N
on
....
I:
,12
""iii
~ ~
~~J
...
9
Lt'l
9v
~<<;
,M
0::'
a.~
'"
CIl
1;;
'13
o
III
III
c(
"" CIl :e
ill ~ g>~
13o~;
:;1ilu>
Lt'l
!2
'"
-
~
-
-
~
'"
III
~
c(
.c
"
11I
Ql
CC
'ti
1ll
C Ql
8:;
1ii~
::I C
E ~
l1I Ql
~ Qj
.5 ~
.c Ql
t:: 0>
oS ~
Cii.c
III ()
en en
<0;5
en
E g;
SE
~ '@
CIl
.s C-
O> .5
.5 ~
'E l1I
@~
11I 0
'0-
2l ~
'0 Cl
>
.5 -.:i
e ~
Q) III
;: I:
.c CIl
() C-
:E E
;c 8
.i~
c'l:
s:!
::; Ql
III..e
C .s
8'0
Q) CIl
;;:e
.s~
~ .~
'" I:
~ ~
ir ::I
CIl ~
1l 8
~ ~
::I .
..e ..
.5 ~
l!! 0
~~
:2 ;c
ei5
C- .5
.. Cl
Q) 'C
'0 0
(;; Ql
Q) :;
g>.s
11I I:
.c ,-
"
'"
:E
I-
,...:
o
's 0
..eN
O~
C .c
~ f::
CD ~ ~
i~.s
,c ..e Ql
l.l 11I E
O~~
! ~.g
.~.~ ~
~ Ql E
o t= 8
.,.
N
....
Il'i
....
.,.
~
Il'i
....
o
q
C;;
o
<Ii
....
o
o
ci
o
00
....
o
q
C;;
N
on
....
o
q
....
'"
N
on
....
I:
o
""1\i
~ ~
~~:J
N
N
~....
~~
,M
0::'
a.8
~
<II
<II
1J ~
,~ -5
5l 11I
<II ~
c( _
': ';;e
Q:l '" g'~
13 ~ 11I C
:;gt5~
III
o
en
-
~
~
'ti
~
8
i5
::I
C
C
11I
Ql
:;
,5
.c
t::
.e
"$
<II
11I
<II
E
oS
Ql
:;
.s
Cl
C
'E
@
11I
'0
2l
'0
.5 -c
l!! ~
Ql en
;: C
.c CIl
() C-
:E E
;c 8
<Ii>-
i:"C
~:!
::I Q)
III..e
C .s
8'0
CIl Q)
:5:2
!a~
~ .fa
III i:
g~
ir::l
Ql ~
1l 8
11I Ql
f!l :;
::I .
..e ..
.5 ~
l!! 0
~~
:2 ;:
ei5
C- .5
.. Cl
Q) '1:
'E 0
o CIl
Ql:;
g>S
11I I:
-5 .-
en '5
:.2.0
1-(5
C
l!!
CD ~
C III
os,SR
,c..e
U 11I
'0 ~
!~
.~ .~
~ Ql
Ot=
'<tU':l""
UJOU':l
e,oO_
....NO
cia""
z......w
Ei016'
~:2Cl.
C'O
"0
C
W
OJ
<(
'"
o
it",
c Ci
Gl l!! " c
g'!;5 g
~IlIU~E
~ E ... <C
U,g~'"
'E
III
o
III
CD
=
oS
"
Gl
C
Gl
III
l!!
lL
ii ...
Gl':~c
==...::1
~li5~~
~ E ... <C
Uo~'"
01:
".8c
Gl ... ::I
III 0 0
't -t! ~
o::~...
sic
&0 5
li-t!s
~o""
U3='"
...
c ~ 5
~ ~ ~
::I ... <C
u~...
...
Gl ..
cv'E5
.S 0 0
.~-t! ~
o~...
I-
0::
o
lL
W
0::
lI)
0::
W
Q
0::
o
li::
0::
o
3=
o
l-
ll)
W
(!)
z
<I:
J:
U
W
>
~
l-
ll)
z
i
Q
<C
..
C
Gl
E
1::
III
a.
Gl
Q
o
Z
... 0
Gl Z
"Et)
o l!
-t!c
o 0
3=u
o
Z
G.1 Gi G:I
E 'E E
~~o~
~ u &u
"GlCGl
if'~e-
>lLUlL
Gl
ftj
Q
E 0
I!! Z
<f:-
a
a
c::i
<f:-
a
a
c::i
a
a
<Xi
'"
a
<Ii
~
...
a
a
c::i
...
a
a
<Xi
'"
a
<Ii
~
...
a
a
<Xi
'"
a
<Ii
~
...
Q;
ii
~
E
c75~
o
oil
a
~~
~~
0.0
"C '"
roc
c 0 Cl)
'Q; 0::: E
't;) ~ ~
53 r!! E!
t:: u.. 0.
-1!. ~ Cl) E
~::g 8,]t
~8lij'8~
(l:~cJ88
It)
Q
~
C')
u
~,~
:s c.
c" g'
.Q) "c
~~
I- ~
~al
" E!
t::.><:
Cl) c
~ ~
Bu..
)( ~
E Cl)
Q)'S
.c g
'E~
g'~
~ 0
E';;;
8.~
Q) '~
-g 3l
~ ~
'0 '(ij
c ~
"C Ol
'5 c
(fl "C
lS 3l
.~ 's,
Q) C
(fl Q)
'0 Ol
<<> .5
c..:2
8 15
(fl ...
Q) 0.
..r:::. .~
I-
o
1J'i.c
a ~
~~
~~
~E
<,g
.9"C
oS!~
~ ~
5 'E
~ 8
oS! Q)
E'.c
8 .~
Cl) '"
:6 fl
'~
Q)
(fl
Q)
(fl
Q)
.c
I-
'"
"C
C
Q)
X
Q)
Q;
'E
o c::
Q) Ol
g> "(i)
~~
" C
UJ ,9
:.c~
1-.52
~
Gi~
c :;
III "C
~ C
" ro
... C
o 0
E~
.~ .5
Gl 'E
~ 8
<f:-
co
co
-i
N
<f:-
co
co
-i
N
a
a
-i
It)
C')
en
It)
...
a
a
,..,:
ctt
~
~
...
a
a
,..,:
C')
It)
r-:
'<t
...
a
a
,..,:
C')
It)
r-:
'<t
...
o
~~
o....J
o
..;.
9",
t::
.C')
::E'
:c8
~
~ lIJ
U) =1:
~ &E
o Q) u.. Cl)
::E ;;0 Ol 0::: 15
Q) a lij ~ ...
'0 It) .c: U 0.
J:~U(/)..5
It)
a
Ln
~
v
a
v
~
fl
C
<ll
.c:
~~
g';:
'E ~
8 Ol
" CIl
<1!i
cUi
~1i
2 E
in e
C ::I
8 e
"co.
~ .S
C Q)
0l0l
'w ;
~13
:6 '"
E-g
~ n:I
>.(fl
e Q)
" g'
8~
CIl "
:6~
~~
"C "
Q) 0-
ti"C
.~ ~
"C Q)
~~
~ c
"~ ~
CIl 0
(fl 0.
'0 E
Q) 8
0.';
8e
(fl CIl
"C E
~.s
[.E;
~o
C C
<ll ,Q
.9=i5
~al
"C Q)
"~ ~
~-o
o ,~
CIl 0-
g'e
~ ~ >.
U n:J 'E
'" (fl "
:.cfl8
I- .~ CIl
CIl.c:
"'-
. OJ.s
'2 UJ
~tf
o~~
~ 12 ">
II 0 E!
~""o.
~'5"C
o al lij
<f:-
co
In
c::i
~
~
ti
CIl
'e-
0.
CIl
:6
'#.
a
a
c::i
a
a
-i
....
co
<Ii
N
...
a
a
c::i
...
a
o
-i
....
co
<Ii
~
N
...
a
a
c::i
a
a
M
a
~
...
E
(fl
'C
5~
I-...J
N
a
cJ,
9~
t~
, C')
::E~
:Co
! "fie
8 ~ II
::E al E
c: -.:t ~.J:
~ & ~ ~
.- N C to 0
E 15 III ~ C
:f~t5::E&
It)
a
Ln
~
v
a
~
e
CIl
E
t::
III
0.
Q)
o
fl
C
'"
C
u:
CIl
:6
....
o
in
CIl
"
0-
e
Q)
:6
ii
In
a
a
N
;:;
~
'"
::E
.9
Q)
~
C
,Q
Qi
is.
E
8
Q)
:6
"C
Q)
"C
C
~
Q)
...
Q)
'E
o
Q)
Cl
C
~
"
(fl
:.c
I-
Gi
C
III
.c
u
'0
~
Gl
~
GI
>
o
<:tLOf'-
UJOLO
,--.., 0 _
NO
'CO
,0
Z"- :g,
E ~ro
~~a..
ro
"0
C
OJ
Cl
<:
U"l
o
1;:",
i: ..
II~-ES
... ~::l 0 0
....ClI(,,)"'E
..cE..<
(,,)00...
.t:~
"E!
ClI
o
1:1:I
Gl
:5
.2
'l:l
S
C
Gl
CII
f
l1.
'i ..
&'6,-E~
i!-fi5~~
..cEi5<
(,,)o~'"
.t:
'l:l i.. i:
3l 0 5
'> of ~
&!~...
.sic
"E! ::l
l!l.o 0
C of E
!o<
(,,)~...
..
"!-E~
~ 0 0
::l '" E
(,,) a <
~...
ClI i C
c .. ::l
._ 0 0
.S!' of E
00<
~...
~
o
l1.
~
m
D::
w
Q
D::
o
~
D::
~
g
m
w
C)
2
~
(,,)
w
2:
~
?-
m
Z
i
Q
<
i:
II
~
III
a.
c!l
o
2
.. 0
-82
o~
of-=
o c
~8
o
2
~ i ~
:!i!o:!
.. 11-
o U III U
'l:l II C Gl
;.~~'f'
>l1.(,,)l1.
S
III
Q
E
~~
~
'"
o
<:i
~
o
'"
o
<:i
~
...
co
'"
.0
..,.
....
<0
o
.c
'"
m
~
o
o
a:i
C"'l
'"
u;j
..,.
....
o
o
a:i
C"'l
'"
u;j
~
::!:a:
~a:
'"
'i'
C"'l
'i'
...J
a:'"
7~
::!:C"'l
~g
"C
_ <<l
~&
ts (U
(U Ol
~ .'$ ~
Q) yO::
,Q .. (U
~ ~ ,E
"C ... c. 0..
C (Ufllfl
..!!l ... g> II) Q
&. :: ~ 'E '~
-; 1i5 c..)..~ Jj
'"
S2
'"
~
o
;e
~
co
f'.:
...
,
<i<
co
f'.:
";'
;;;
.c
o
co
o
..,.
....
Ci
co
..t
C"'l
l'-
~
-0
(U
II)
:>
'0
c:
e
~
iii
:5
II)
(U
:0
m
:>
,Q
E
o~
Q)
:5
{3
:>
"C
(U
"C
"C
c:
<<l
~
'E
o
~
o
~
(U
:5
II)
~
o
"1:l
~
'E
o
(U
g>
<<l
ti
II)
:E
I-
o
C!
i.
i
o
C!
::;
~
::;
....
::!:a:
~a:
C"'l
C)l
C"'l
o
~;;;
, ...
9:6
1-0
E
1j!,g(U
en -B~2
~ Q.1 ~ Q)
00 "" c: .i{
~ '@gj~
II) <E_
< (U&!~
"" ... c.
(U::8,~fl~
(U N c: "C ,- ....
caO~C:~Ul
::!:\BUjUl::l
C
III
.r.
U
'0
.
.1
~
~
It)
S2
'"
I:::!
..,.
o
l'-
...
-0
(U
<II
::l
'0
C
e
(U
~
iii
:5
II)
Q)
:0
~
::l
.0
E
.~
(U
:5
{3
:>
al
"C
"C
C
<<l
~
'E
o
.:JJ!.
~
(U
:5
II)
(U
II)
o
"1:l
~
'E
o
(U
Ol
C
<<l
ti
l/)
:E
I-
Gi
C
III
.r.
U
'0
J:
.!II
c:
~
o
Agenda Item No. m4
May 10, 05
Page 9 f 57
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: Exterior Fa~ade Renovations Courthouse PROJECT #: 52004
BIDIRFP #: 01-3235 MOD #:
2
AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE 2,350.00
POI:
Work Order #: SS..Q2..Q2
Last BCC Approved Amount
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 24,000.00 CURRENT $27,100.00
(STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
(LASTTOTALAMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval
Agenda Item #
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractlWork Order: $3,100.00
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount 12.92 %
Formula: {Current Amount I Last BCC approved amount}-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.C.4.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: 1218104 CURRENT: 6130/05
._".._-~.~Y. Q~..P..R9pO~ED ~~Qg. (~).:}d~t:i!Y.~~_~~~n.~~: ...A~~!i<?pa1 ~~~ .~"l!~~de_ ~~gs
and specification references for the upgrade of railings. .
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the project?
Per direction of the Fire Code official.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE' CHANGE: Rob Griffin, (Fire Inspector) Robert Fuentes, and
Surety Construction.
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N/A)
- Y - Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
- Y - Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
- Y - Change is being i e d in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
_ Y _ The appropriat arties hay been consulted regarding the change
- Y - Proposed p' s, fees and osts s rth in the change are reasonable
Date:
Revised 12/23/04
,.-
,;;
Agenda Item No. 16F.D
May 10, 2~
Page 10 of 57
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: NCRWTP R.O. Water Supply Reliability Improvements
Additional Wells on Existing Sites
PROJECT #: ~ 94 9a '1/ tTt) ~
BID/RFP #: 00-3119 MOD #: 01-01 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $ 0.00
PO #: 4500030467 Work Orde r #: HS-FT -04-03
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 741,220.00 CURRENT $ 741,220.00
(STAR11NG POINT) QNCLUDING TtIS CHANGE ORDER)
Last BCC Approved Amount $ 741,220.00
(LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval: 6/2212004 Agenda Item # 16 (C) (12)
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractlWork Order: $ 0.00
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount 0.000/0
Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) 1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific Infonnation regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Proceclures, Section III.C.4
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):
SUBSTANTIAL: ORIGINAL: 11/112004
PROJECT FINAL: ORIGINAL: 12/13/04
CURRENT: 11130/05
CURRENT: 12/31/05
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): The purpose of this no-cost change order is to extend the
original contract completion date as noted above. This contract (work order) includes engineering services
for easement acquisition. permitting, desIgn, bidding, construction contract administration, detailed
construction observation and additional services associated with the construction of additional water supply
wells on existing well sites for the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Acquisition of easements and the approval process for both the
environmental resource permit and the site improvements plan have required more time than originally
anticipated and have postponed the start date for construction.
O:\4101o.003\EngIChange Order No. 1 to Worle Order\CMC-C01-1 3-29-05.doc
Agenda Item No. 16i4r
May 10, ~~
Page 11 of 57
County Work Order No, HS-FT-04-03
NCRWTP R. O. Water Supply Reliability Improvements Additional Wells on Existing Sites
Change Ordsr No. 1 to Work Ordsr
Contract Modification Checklist Form, Page 2 of 2
March 29, 2005
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Oelivery Team (i.e. - Water Department.
County Project Manager, Engineer)
PLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N/A)
Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope _ 11 M. IF' ONL.y
Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
roposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable -No Go~r C/r:HJ G-
rJ
CONSULTING ENGINEER RECOMMENDATION:
RECOMMEND: ..:.AJ~...~?
DO NOT RECOMMEND:
PROJECT MANAGER RlWP_FNQ!QJ.~:. I L
RECOMMEND: ~ ~
DO NOT RECOMMEND:
COMMENTS:
Date: 3/2",10 S-
Date:
Date: 3/Jf Ir)~-
Date:
~"\i ltiVJ~ f.,y ~
oa~ ~,...,~ s(\:-q IHA S,
i rAt. (kfJr.
4/' /05
,
p~
O:\41010-003\Eng\CMC-C01-13-29-05,doc
~
Agenda Item No. 16E4
May 10005
Page ~f 57
. '
'CONTRACT MODlF'ICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: Landa1:aDe Ar.eJriIIlctural s.nricH for UviDliaton AoacI,b..".... Road to,countv
Line 12.8m1I_l
PRCUeCT #:Fund 313.-11317S-7D11JO.81041
BlQl.RFP:I: OD-3131. Fbr.ed TWIn Lan1IacaM Arctdtactund tlandcea MOD t: -L-AMOUNT OF THIS
CHANGE S' ~ .".fiJl.OO
POt:4aOOO.8241 WorkOrder~ lUI..oP..o3-03
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ~AL J _40, CURRENT S 47..m.4O , ,
en II PCMT) ~". ciw<<E ORDEJQ
Last Bce ApproVed Amount $ 48;_.<40 tDESlGN INCLUDED IN MASTeR PLAN APPROVAl..\
CLMT1'O'MLAIIT.~BCC~
Date of L.ntBCC Approwd ADrII:22. 2001 Agendau.m ',11&
cum&ddiM.DcilbIr Va'" of Cha.O.... to this CIIntractIWork Order: U ' 380 . 00
PM-mtIIge of the chaftge OVM1under curMlt cuabact amount-d
Formutal (Current Amount J Last see ~ amount)-1
ReButts and Acliona: If the change exceeds 10% aoc ~ is :~;under 1a'K reported to BCCon
Purch8sfng repo.rt. Far specific infarmBtlon rwgring worttorcter~... 'please refer tel) the Contract
_~~...sectiOR-UI;..C...4....-,-._-_.._----_.__.._--~"--"--"'" .". ......,--.-.--
'CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORlGltW..: CamDIIitIDn of COllmuctlon OURRENT: 511.
SUMaARV OF PROPOSED CHANGE IS,): Iden'IIf9 the~
. AdCIItlOnaf daV;a are need.d :to cIai'th "'C~n dtCaMttUc:ltlOll~ whtcb.. 485 dIift
cOmDltdioci 5I181208Sl.
JUSllFICATION FOR ,CHARGE (8): What value or ....doe_e___ ,arovIde to the D1'DIeCt?
. Addltlonal:dMs 8'" nellded to clartfv coMbIIIIion datea tot the ClerIC of Courta and A_nee
~~ '
. d tbII comDllltton of the ..aect whlCb 1iIR'" ctuIIIc8tIOn. on ttIe Work Ot'd6l'
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CMAHGE:
~=w=.~= =~;.~~:m~~r.chasina: Glori.. Her-rers. ~ analYSt: ,: Dtane
__' 0_. __"-- __ Rl_.;.... ~_ ~_ for Uvlnaaton Road tlrMmkalee - Oourrtv Une:i:
Ketsev W8rd.Purchaaina .
L,,=,::~
;'\'" . /,/:~~i-i;. ,:.,.;j::. :.~ :' ~i..,.,'..."'":<M.,;.'I.,,/': ;\''''4
..
Agenda Item No. 1~
May 10, 2
Page130 7
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME:Clerks MIS 5th Floor Bldg. F PROJECT #: 50031
BIO/RFP #: O/-JJ..3S MOD #: 2 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $1,010.00
PO #: 4500022525 Work Order #: 0A-02-04
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 33,385.00 CURRENT $34,895.00
(STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
Last BCC Approved Amount N/A
(LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval N/A Agenda Item # N/A
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractJWork Order: $1,510.00
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount 4.52%
Formula: (Current Amount I Last BCC approved amount}-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section "I.CA.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: 4117/05 CURRENT: 4/17/05
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Identify the changes: Electrical Plan Layout revisions due to th(
revisions of furnishings layout and resulting coordination with electrical and data locations within the Tenant
space. The electrical engineering resulting in partial re-drafting of electrical plan, for coordination with new
furniture layout, plotting and printing for documents re-submitted to the Community Development for
modification to the building permit.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the project?
These changes were requested by the Clerk of Courts staff, due to changes in furnishing layout, and was
required by Community Development.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Dalas Disney, Wayne Fyffe(Clerk of Courts) George
Westgate (Surety Construction)
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N/A)
_ Y _ Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
_ Y _ Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
_ Y _ Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
_ Y _ The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
- Y _ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
REVIEWED BY:
Co
ATlON: This form is to be signed and dated.
- Date: 4/6./l)r
.
Date: 1 /~/6S-
APPROVE BY:
Pro'
Revised 12/23/04
PROJECT NAME: Sc((wTP
n-
BIDIRFP #: 1/,t{-.I>...t>MOD I:
Agenda Item Nod4
May 1 ~005
Page 14 of 57
CONTRACT MODIFICAnON
CHECKLIST FORM
Fl~~ UfS'~ PROJECT #:
I POI: 1./50003.36.30 WORK ORDER #:
Original Contract Amount:
Current Contract Amount:
Last BCC Approved Amount:
Amount of This Change:
$ Icr 3. 000
(S~Point)
$ ~ I q~, 000
(All Chat1~ Prior To 'This Modification)
$ ~/A
(Last Total AJpount Requiring BCC Approval)
- $ I. 6 ~()
.
Revised Contract Amount: $ I ~ I , :3 SO .
(Including This Q\ange Order)
- ' (JO
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractlWork Order: $ ';6 ;;1.0, -
Date of Last Bee Approval
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount
Formula: (Current Amount I Last BCC approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific infonnation regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.C.4.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: Y65/as CURRENT: ;;&-;65'
,JA
Agenda Item # tJA
- o,s-i.f
%
o
ING THE CH
\J, e- ,,"
IMPLEM NTAnON ST S rl each before proceeding w change using V, N or NlA)
'( Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
i Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
Change Is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
:L Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
: This form Is to be signed and dated.
Dale: ~
Date: ~
APPROVE BY:
Pr .
REVIEWED BY:
C t
Revised 3/10/2005
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
Agenda Item Nf3g4
May 10, 05
Page 16 57
PROJECT NAME: Forest Lakes Clubhouse Storm Sewer PROJECT #: 380831
BID/RFP #: 04-3535 MOD #: i AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $(29,188.00)
PO .: 4500028339
Work Order #: ATM -F.L. - M.S. - 04 - 03
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL SIJlY CURRENT $ i7~7~OO
(IT NO NT) (lNCLUD IS HANG! ORDER)
last BCC Approved Amount $ 251.3~0
(LA8T AL AMY. REQUIRING Bce APPROVAL)
Date of last BCC Approval Mav 11. 2004
Agenda Item # 18-B-2
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orde,. to this ContractlWork Order: $ (44.188.00)
-
Percentage of the change overlJUUat[ current contract amount 1Lm
Fonnula: (Current Amount I Last BCC approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approvalls required; under 10% reported
to BCC on Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please
refer to the Contract Administration Procedures, Section III.C.4
CURRENT COMPLETION D~TE (8): ORIGINAL: Auaust 12. 2004 CURRENT: ADrll19. 2005
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (8): Identify the changes. 1. 30" RCP & 18- RCP -
Decrease of RCP Quantities: 2. Swale #16 Re-aradlna - Deaease in Re-arade Swale. 36" RCP and
Construct Swale French Drains: 3. Swale #2 Re-qrading - Decrease in Re-arade Swale: 4. Add
additional 160 Davs. '
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide the
project?
Quantities ad lusted/lowered to reflect final auantItles, Installed. Additional davs added due to the
hurricanes and to cav vendor for services rendered over the orlalnal 90 davs an increase is so
reflected.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Mitchell & Stark Construction Co. Inc.. Craie
Paler P.E. from Wilson Miller the MSTU's Deslsm Professional and Rhonda Rembert from Purchasing
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N1A)
.:/Proposed change Is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
~roposed change Is In fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
-",Change Is being Implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
-"r("The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
L Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
PROJECT MANAGER RECOMMENDAll0N: this fonn Is to be signed and dated.
APPROVE BY: Date: o/~lUy U1'
P~e # /
REVIEWED BY: ' ,~Date: /6. #JlL ~
Cant ct Specialist ~
H-Drive, TO&ATM, Landscape Doc:a., Work Orders, Contract Mod. Check List
REVISED 12/23/04
.~ '.
Agenda Item Nl916E4
May 11>, 2005
Page 17 of 57
CHECKUSTFORM
PROJECT NAME: TnmtIDOrtation Concurrency Management ~m Develaument and
Maintenance ProlectSch4tdule PROJECT #: 101091
BlDlRFP tt 02.3371
,PO #.: 415000377..
MOD #.:
1
_AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $
u
Work Order ~ TBE-FT ..05-01
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAl S 21.178.75 ~ $ 21.878.75
(&T-'IR11NG POINT) (lllfeWDING THIS CHANGE ORD~
Last Bee Approved Amount $
, , {LA'STTOl'AL,.wr.REQUlR/tltGIitCCAPPRDVAL.)
Date of Last Bee Approval
Agendll '..... #
Cumulatlw DoII.-V8Iue of Change Orders to this ContnIctIWcn Order: $
D
p~ of the ~OY8I'/under current co.~tI.d 8IIIOIMt %
Formula: (Cummr Amount I Last BOe appl'Oll8d amount)-1
R~an.dAdions: If the change exceeds 10% see approval is rvqulred; under 10% reported to BOC on
Purchasing report. For specific information regan.fil .g ~ order thresholds, please refer to the Cordl'act
A.......bwl.M.....tion ~ - Section ute... .rI1rb"
~~~.,~~ ~/~
, CURRENT COMPLETION DA TE(S):ORIGIHAL.: 11J112OO4CURAENT: ',2) ,
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE(S):ldentifythe cIWtgM.
for three remainina su~.
JUS1lFICATION FOR CHANGE (8): WtRIt VIIIue or beneat do theM .... ~ide to the pI~
0nIv one of the three remainina subtasks are driven bv staff direction. ~. reauestina the
tbation d the work order be extMded bv six months.
Reo~na an additional 6 months
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: See lettef f1'pm Dawn R. Wolfe. Sr. Proled .MBn8Der
from TBE. GFOUD.
IMPLEIIENTATION STEPS (VetJfy each befont proceedlngwtlh c....ge ..... V,. N or MIA)
..x.. Proposed change is consisteM with the scope of 1he exlstJngagreenlent
~ Proposed change is in fact an addition or ~ tattle existing scope
...x... Change is being jmpJemented In a mannerCOl'lllstent with the ~ agreement
-1L The appropriate ~ have been consutted regard1ng the change
_ Proposed prices. fees and costs set forth In the change BAt reasorrabfe
11ON~ n.ts. form. to be .."'" ..,., dated. '
Date:
APPROVE BY:
P .
REVIEWED BY: '
Revised 12123/04
---:::....-.:..;...,(.:io.-. ~. ,..~..' '.lM/r";".,.
""". '. ;""'., ",-,'..-:.~ . ",.
,
Agenda Item Nrfo6E4
May 10 005
Page 1 of 57
CONTRACT ~tcATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: ,1ImncIIcII1_ RoadGN_v
:PROJECTt: 800321
BIDlRFP 'I: 01-3290
MOD t:
1
AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE . 0
PO #: ~ Workom.r;J: ABB-FT..0a.04
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL :T~~~
Last BCC Appl'Oftd AInouDt.$ NlA
(L.ASTlOTAL MIT. ~ ace AfIIIIROYAL)
~T$ ~~
{INCIIJDIM:J.....
Data af t.-t BCC Approval
NlA
Agenda Item 1#
NlA
Cumuldve Dollar Val. of e...... 0..... to 1hiS Contrac:tMork OrCler. $ 0
p~ Of the change cwerluHar CIIIftftt contrlH:t amount 0 %
Formula; (Current Amount I Last BOO .pprovedsmount)-1 '
Restdts aDd Actions: If the change exceed. 10% BCC approVIII is ftIlCVJlred; under 1 (1" reported to BCC an
Purchasing report. For spectfic, Information regard\ng work order th.-l1alds, please ,refer to the Contract
Administration P~ures, Section R1.C.4.
CURRENT COMPLETlON DATE (S):ORtGlMAL: 51&105
CURRENT: 712gKJ5
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (5): IdeDtlfytbe ~ ',A.t-MiRD titles and rates "'At do not
a1fact the dollaT value of_ wm'k order. AM11\f 1ime to ~~, for I*uilit:.w
JUSTlFlCA1'ION FOR CHANGE (S): 'WIIIIt._ or beMftt do_ 'chanlMprovIde to tile project?
Ac;undelv nIftect8 the titles and nItM for work to be comr.WJtad Time extended based an DFior
MDerience In seekinaHrmltsfor a sJmfIIr ctr'flIIt'MaV.DmieGt..
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Purehaslna. transaortatlon budaet, anafYSt
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS {VerIfJ,eacl1 ""nt proceecIIftg with cb.....,ualftgy, Nor NlA.
y _ Proposed change is consistent with the ,SCQPe of the otdng agteemeDt
N_Pfopoeed change is in fact an aQdition or detetlon to the e,dsting scope
y _ Change Is being implemented in a manner eonsi6tent witt\ the eatingagree.ment
Y _ The appropriate par.tles have beeAconsulted regarding ttle change
y _ Proposed prices, fees and costs set for.th In.the change are~bIe
PROJECT .ANAGERRECOM~NDATlON: lbiefarm18 .be ...... and.......,..
~ROVE~:fJ!1~ ~ 3~q~~
REViEWED BY: Date: l' '/9 as
Contract Specialist
Revised 12/23/04
~.:.t. ;~'!.,I)'"
.jI:;'~~~:~~.~!A
__.__.._"__"_,,.~. ~..' . __"'~"'~_V' ..,
Agenda Item No. 16E;4^
May 10, 20QfJJ
Page 19 of 57
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKUSTFORM
PROJECT NAME: BAYVIEW BEACH ACCESS (VANDERBilT BEACH ACCESS 17; MANSIONS)
PROJECT #: 90016
BID/RFP I: 00-3131 MOD I: l AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE: $800.00
WORK ORDER #: PR-MA-03-01 PO I: 4500000835
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $3,640. CURRENT $4,440.
(STARTlNG POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
Last Bce Approved Amount $0.00 - NOT REQUIRED
(LASTTOTAL AMT. REQUIRING Bee APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval: N1A
, Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractIWork Order: $800.00
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount: +21.97%
Formula: (Current Amount I Last BCe approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 1 0% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.CA.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: 6/2512003 CURRENT: 1113012005
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Identify the changes. This Change Order 12 is to providr
reimbursable expenses for the consultant, Invoiced according to the annual contract. $800 is thl.
amount assocl8ted with this change order. When the original work order was created, relmbursables
were inadvertentfy not built 'Into the work order. Subsequently, the consultant has had to provide for
permit fees, aerial photography, delivery charges, etc... No additional days are being added to the
contract time with this change order.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the project?
The addition of .reimbursable expenses to this work order allows the consultant to be fairly
compensated for his direct expenses as allowable by the contract.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Parks and Recreation Director, Public Services
Administrator, Purchasing Contracts Agent
IMPLEMENTATiON STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N1A)
Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or deleti9n to the existing scope
Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agre~ment
Y The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
Y Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the' change are reasonable
PROJECT MA
APPROVE BY:
N ION: This form Is to be ~ned ~d dated.
Date: \ &5 c:,
~SLA; Senior Project Manager
Date: {., /1 ,.()r
Revised 12/23/04
:-~
Agenda Item NO~1\E4
May 10 2~5
Page 20 f 57 ,
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKUST FORM
PROJECT NAME: VANDERBILT BEACH ACCESS #3 PROJECT #: 90023
BIOIRFP #: 04-3614 MOD #: 1 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE: $800.00
WORK ORDER #: PR-MA-05-04 PO #: 4500039336
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $5,225. CURRENT $6,025.
(STARTING POIKT') ~NCLUDlNG THIS CHANGE ORDER)
Last BCC Approved Amount $0.00 - NOT REQUIRED
(LAST TOTAL AJKr. REQUIRING Bee APPROVAL)
Date of Last Bce Approval: N1A
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractlWork Order: $800.00
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount: +15.31%
Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approv~ amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to sec on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.C.4.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: 12161200 CURRENT: 3/1612007
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Identify the changes. This Change Order #1 Is to provide
additional time to the work order for permitting and design reasons and to add reimbursabte expenses
for the consultant, invoiced according to the annual contract. Originally the County Project Manager
provided an unrealistic amount of time (465 days) for the consultant to research, design, permit, bid
and service the construction of the project. The time frame Is unrealistic because we have come to
learn that the normal design and construction time of a project of this nature (a renovation of an
existing beach access facility) can take up to two years. Because this project ha. to go through FDEP
and Collier County Coastal Constr.uction Setback Line permitting, the permit time needs to be greatly
extended. In anticipation of the planned CCL permitting, bidding, building permitting, and actual
construction time; 365 days are being added to the work order via this change order.
$800 Is the amount associated with the reimbursable expenses being added to this change order.
When the original work order was created, reimbursables were inadvertently not built Into the work
order. Subsequently, the consultant has had to provide for permit fees, aerial photography, delivery
charges, etc...
Revised 12123/04
Agenda Item No. 16E4
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 57
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify-each before proceeding with change using V, Nor N1A)
Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
Y The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
Y Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
PROJECT MAN
APPROVE BY:
J e
o ION: This form is to be sign., and'jsted.
Date: ~ I"J? (;:
LA; Senior Project Manager /
. Date: #V~
Revised 12/23/04
" _4.".
Agenda Item No. 16E1-,
May 10, 2010 ""
Page 22 of 57
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: V ANDERBIL T BEACH ACCESS #1 PROJECT #: 90026
BIDIRFP #: 00-3131 MOD #: 1 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE: $800.00
WORK ORDER #: PR-MA-04-22 PO #: 4500029847
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $5,291. CURRENT $6,091.
(STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
Last BCC Approved Amount $0.00 - NOT REQUIRED
(LAST TOTAL AMr. REQUIRING Bce APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval: N1A
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractIWork Order: $800.00
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount: +15.12%
Formula: (Current Amount I Last BCC approved amount)-1 .
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section IlI.CA.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAl: 1212212004 CURRENT: 6/2512005
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Identify the changes. This Change Order #1 is to provide
additional time to the work order for permitting and design reasons and to add reimbursable expenses
for the consultant, invoiced according to the annual contract. Originally the County Project Manager
provided an unrealJstlc "amount of time (180 days) for the consultant to research, design, permit, bid
and service the construction of the project. The time frame is unrealistic because we have come to
learn that tile normal design and construction time of a project of this nature (a renovation of an
existing beach access facility) can take up to two years. Because this project has to go through FDEP
and Collier County Coastal Construction Setback Line permitting, the permit time needs to be greatly
extended. In anticipation of the planned CCl permitting, bidding, building permitting, and actual
construction time; 185 days are being added to the work order via this change order.
$800 is the amount associated with the reimbursable expenses being added to this change order.
When the original work order was created, reimbursables were inadvertently not built into the work
order. Subsequently, the consultant has had to provide for permit fees, aerial photography, delivery
charges, etc...
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the project?
The addition of reimbursable expenses to this work order allows the consultant to be fairly'
compensated for his direct expenses as allowable by the contract. The additional time will allow the
consultant the necessary time to properly permit the project and for the County to construct the
project.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Parks and Recreation Director, Public Services
Administrator, Purchasing Contracts Agent
Revised 12123/04
'#-
Agenda Item No. 16E4
May 10, 2005
Page 23 of 57
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, Nor N/A)
Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
Y The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
Y Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
PROJECT M
APPROVE BY:
AnON: This form is to be Si~~,,!d dated.
Date: f ~ ~
elate, ASLA; Senior Project Manager '
" Date: fI;, /,y-
. . t
Revised 12/23/04
Agenda Item No. ~~
May 10, !0Qt
Page 24 f 57
~ J. ~;Z 'fJ
CONTRACT MODI.F1CATlON
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME. ~ranlc RdCUlvert IrADrv PROJECT a: ~1fJD55
Blon:n:p 1t:.0 /-3,:;.90-"00'. ~ ,AMOUNT' OF THIS CHANGE $ 0.00
PO t; 480Q041201 Work Order': PKA-FT ..05-01
CONTRACT AMOUNt:'CJ:Rl8m.AL" $$....1I.JlI . ..to CURRENT a!. . . .,to ,
~ .. '., T1!IS~c:naIQ
ILaat Bee'. A'pPtCMld AmDantJ.:r~ 1IIiT~ RE........1JGe APMWAL)
rDtdeof Last Bee ApprovalNfA Ag8b.da1tem # ,.,A
Curnufathte oeilar \IarUe. of CbangeO..,de... to Ibta ~rk, 0n:IIIt':' 0.10 ,
:~~_~ofthec:.,ge~r C~ t:cmtrc:t ~.JL~
Formula: (Current Amol:D1tlLast Bee appro'WKl'.amc.unt)..1 .' .. . . . "
:Rewlt$'.s.nd Adlons: It th$ chafQ!t ex~ 10% see approval (81'equired; under 1,* reported to Bee on
:Purchaalng report., ,For specific Il.'lbmt\tionl'e{lardtng work ortfeI' 1hr~ .pieeserefw to the ~
Adtninfstr:auon Proc:ecijJre$,.~' f.U.C-4 .
aJRRENT'COM~EtJON DATE ($): ORIGfttAL; <March 4.2005 CUMENT: A'Dril28. 2005
SUIIMARV:OF 'PROPOSiEo'CRANGE (S): Add an addiIIOnaJ 65....to ~~I~ dp.
~-~) ,
~'FQIJ QJ1MGE (8); To ~ date et ~ 10 vendor's &meded finish date.
(\!\IhlIt.,.'Or."".~ ~pn;Mda IDt/rtI.~.
:P.AR11ES CONTACTED REG.AADQfGTHE OHANGE: ~.and 1!IDn~ Counlv Staff
IIMPLEMENTATlON nJ,!p$ ,~_ befGrl~lJ,""d,W/Ilt ,udIg?; N(Jt' AVA)
Y Proposed. change is Consistent.With the aoop.e, of. the. aisting egre6iTM3nt
~ Ptq:IOSe.c;I ctlangeJs In fact, an addition 01' deletion tottte:.estJrfg,scape
:.1 c~ rs being lniplemented Tn atTl8rirrtll' conslabmt.. the'axlstihg ..,.",ent
:t.. The approprlllt8' parties haye been consulted regarding ,.,. ct'1anp ,
::L Proposed prices. tees and .Cost$ ,Nt fOrth in tf\e cbat'lga i.U'a readable
PROJECT MANAGER RECOMMENDA11ON: _lam /I1UIIt-" r/gtIfHt and tIIItecQ
. APPROVE Erf:- ~, , ' Date: 0'1 /1 ~({; s-'
Gi~ NiCol'" ~~' ~ 7 ~ I.. ~ 1. .,-
REVIEWED BY: .~ Date: 'o/'/,?tl~
ContFact SpectalIst f
Rt:yised 12123104
~~'~..'lfi.'.'~:7.;c..~:.:~:~:~l.~:~i;':.'; . 'I,,' /'. ~~,~. '.
__:.:.:.:.:.i;clO..~~'
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: scwf;..F R~/i6bl'/"~Y I~/J(,oVC!Mellfs PROJECT #: 7..?508"/1
GN.tr<c~i ,
BIDIRFP #: 00-3f/1 MOD #: I POI: '-J50CX)?J660 WORK ORDER I: tin -FT -Olf-O(
Agenda Item NriE4
May 10 2 05
Page 2 0 57
Original Contract Amount:
$ 4~S37
(Starting Point)
$ ~0S37
$ (Al~~es Prior To This Modification)
(Last Total Amount Requiring Bee Approval)
$ III J 17
$ ~I 3St.f
(Including This Change Order)
Cumulative DoDar Value of Change Orders to this ContractIW ork Order: $
Current Contract Amount:
Last BCC Approved Amount:
Amount of This Change:
Revised Contract Amount:
II. f(7
.
Date of Last BCC Approval
JJ~
Agenda Item #
IoJfI
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount
Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCe approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to Bce on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.C.4.
~I./.cgl:.
%
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL:
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (8 : Identify the cha
/ - .. "' (j P.5 I
CURRENT:
fO;;s-Ar
t"
IFICATION FOR CH GE (S): Wh~t value or benefit do these changes provide to the project?
Y\ T r ~ ~ iJot.. . (}
.' . '. If"tr. I c::!
c "'f::I! 1"'- 1'rrX;u.n?~1.t .s7n.f.-.u
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: ;k~-!'h/f62.s, seLVA1=' .5k+t q~
FIAED pj,(rL~j~ '
IMPLEM'NTATlON S S (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N1A)
Y'< Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
I Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
Proposed prices. fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
Revised 3/10/2005
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
Agenda Item No. 16E4# (
May 10, 200
Page 26 of 5
", I ; ..
BIDIRFP t: 01-3271 MOD t:
4 POI: 4500013065
PROJECT#: _ 80502
WORK ORDER': HM-FT -03-02
PROJECT NAME: Hideaway Beach Renourlshment
Current BCC Approved. Amount:
Change Order AmOUllt:
$ 103,000
(Starting PoiDt)
$ 216.784.00
(All Ch8Dges Prior To This :ModificatiOll)
$ 216.784.00
(Last Total Amount RequiriDg Bee ApprcmI1)
$ 0
()riciIlal Contract Amount:
CurreJJt: CODtract Amount:
Revised Contract Amount:
$ 216,784.00
(Including This ChaDge Order)
Cumulative Donar Value ofChaDae Orden to this CODtract/Work Order: $$113.784.00
Date of Last Bee ApprovalJanuary 25. 2005
Agenda Item # ~
Percentage of the change overlunder currwnt contract amount 0 %
Fonnula: (Cunent Amount I Last BCC approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific infonnation regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.CA.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: February 15.2005 CURRENT: March 31. 2005 .
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (5): Identify the changes. To extend Droiect comDIetion time until March
31.2005.
JU5T1FICA TION FOR CHANGE (8): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the project?
Work is COI'IIDI8l8d but there .... two mOM Invoices aendlna does noIlmDllCt the cost of the work order. It Is to
enable Finance to DaY.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Humiston & Moore
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each befont proceeding with change using Y. Nor NlA)
Y _ Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
N_ Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
Y _ Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
Y _ The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
Y _ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
PROJECT MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: This fonn is to be signed and dated.
APPROVE BY: /4 C Date: 4/i1 (15
REVIEWED B-i ~e n er tAl Date: tf/r f /,.t;
Co
Revised 3/1 0/2005
".l _.
Agenda Item No. 16E4
Ma11P._2005
Pagr u:;bf 57
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: Pine Rldae Road
BIDJRFP.: 00.3131 MOD':
1
PO .: 4600014178
Work Order .: TUI..JRL-G3-4&
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGiNAl $ ~.538.(N) CURRENTS 45.&81.94
(I NG POINT) (lNCl.UDING lID CHANGE ORDER)
Last BCC Approved Amount $
(LAST TOTAL AMY. REQUlAIIIG Bee APPROVAL)
Date of Laat BeC Approval_N1A Ag.... Item. _N1A
Cumulative Dollar ValUe of Change Orders to this ContractlWorkOrder:J-..958.06
Percentage of the change over/und.r cu.....nt contract amount -2 %
Formula: (Current Amount I Last Bee approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCe on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work orc:ler threshok:Js, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures. Section III.C.4.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORlGINAL: Auauat 30. ,20M CURRENT: Auaust 30. 2004
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Identify the c........ D8ducIions of Task &.0 ~bIM
S956.06
JUSTlPICAnON FOR CHANGE (8): Wh8t valu. or benefttdo1heM changes provide to the 'projeCt?
Chanae Order to dOH the Work Order
REVIEWED BY:
C
PARnES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Pam Lullch. Gtor.ia H......ra. J.. Roland Uber. and
Diane f'laaa
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify ..ch before proceec:ftng With change usfng Y, N or N/A)
L PrGposed change IS-CORalstem-with the scope of theexlsting-agMement
.:L. Proposed change is In fact an addition or deletion to the' 8Xiftfng scope
L Change Is being Implemented in a manner consistent with the eXisting agreement
L The appropriate parties have been consultecl regarding the change
l Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
nn 'S to be~. ed ~nd~ datad.
Date:~S~o-
Date: ~ &zJ--5
Revised 12/23/04
. ---~
_.i.':
P. ,
.; '." t. ..
Agenda Item NO'1E4
May 1!t: 05
Page 2r 57
J_
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAIIE: RaftlesMk. Hammock
PROJECT #: 610211
BlDlRFP'I: 00-3131 MOD t:
PO I: .u0&01GC7
1
AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE S ..734.89
Work Ordwt:, TLo..MA-G-3-Z3
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ ~ ~'1.00 CURRENi'f$ <10.801.31
(8YM'IlNG POINT) tlMeWDRn.. CIWICJE.ORDI!R)
Last ace Approved Amount $
(LiAIT 1OTAL"".REaUIRING1M:C ~AL)
D_ of Last see Approval NlA ~ Item ## _NJA
CwnuldYe 00..... v..... of Change OI'ders to this COnthlCtfWoltc: Older: S -734.81
Percentage of the chang_ over1Undercummt c:ontnd lImOunt -2 %
ForITiula: (Cur.rent Amount / Last 8CC approved amourlt)-1
Results and ActIons: If the change exceeds ,~ BCC approval is requil'8d; under 1'Ocjreported to .see on
PurchQing MPOrt. For specific lnfarmation regerding wen oraer thresholds, .p1uIe refer to the Contract
Adnii. a-batkm Procec:kns, Secfion IU.C....
CURRENT CoMPlETION DATE (S):ORtGINAL: October 11. 2003 CUARSNT: OctDber 15..2DOS ,
SU.MARY Of PROPOSeD CHANGE (8): identify the chang.. DId~Oft of ..s734.. fw relmllu....1ea
JUSTIFlCATlON FOR CHANGE (I): WMt__ or beMftt do ..... chan... provide 'to ttIe project?
ChIInae Order to cIDIIe the W4.t Order'
PARTIeS CONTACTED REGARD1NG THE CHANGE: Pmn Lulld,. MIke IIcOM. GlorIa ....r1'8nil.nci DI..ne
FIaaa
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (VMtfy NCh befoN proc..dinl w1th chanp ....ng Y, N or MIA)
.::L Proposed change is co,nsistent wJth the ecope of the 8Kisting agnHIm8nt
..:L Proposed change is in fact an addttionor deletion 10 the existing acope
lChange is being mplemented in a manner conalstent with the exI8fing agJ'88ment
.::L The appropriate parties have been consu1ted regarding the c:hansIe
..::L Proposed price.. feet and C08t8 let forth In the chenge are reasonable
=: ~.~~
REVIEWED BY: : 1/p.f;-MS
cOntract Specialist I
Revised 12123/04
I..ao."...."...' -.'.' "i..' '
,
,.,',;;,;;;:
VI.{)I::t-~
WOlil
tOO!!;:
......Nlb'
660)
Z.....N
Q,l
E 10' OJ
Q,l""" C'O
:::""'Cl.
C'O
"0
c:
Q,l
OJ
<C
"E
m
o
ED
III
=
.2:g
al >.
<: m
Ill:!:
'"
~
Q.
'C
1:1.
<
~
a::
o
a..
W
a::
(/)
a::
W
o
a::
o
W
Cl
Z
<
:z:
u
W
>
j:
:!
~
(/)
Z
:i
c
<
III C
l:Jle!
c: ...
'" :t
~u
u E
-.e. 0
.t:
Gl
8,g'...
il!-8
.c: U...
u"'o
~~
'a
Gl
'"
,';
&
t;c
f.! !
c E
0<
U...
Q) ... g
~Glo
II '2 E
.c:o<
u ...
'a
Gl
C e 5
~ 1:1. 0
~ g. E
uu<
u'"
ID
-
C ti 5
! .G 0
... c: E
:t 0 <
Uu...
C
Gl
E
~
'"
1:1.
c!
o
z
~ 0 f ~
~~~o~
15ti II s,ti
-g .~ ~ ; .~
~ ... o..c ...
>a..uuQ.
Gl
'l6
c
E
~~
'a
Gl
e g
1:1.0
I:I.E
'"<
~...
ID
*'
o
o
o
*'
o
o
o
o
o
...,:
;!
N
....
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
...,:
;!
N
....
~
o
o
~
N
....
~
c:
,g
I)!
"'iu;
'0 'c
fii 'E
~~:J
ti
5
.;
~
m
'u
o
'"
'"
<
o(l
...
Ql
,~
o
Ql ~
ce '"
'B<c'"
~z8
'"
~
!::1
'"
o
'E
QJ~
01",
c: '"
m c:
.c: 0
UU
'"
Ql
'6
'"
en
Ql
III
U.
1:)
m
0-
~
~ '"
'" g'
2l :2
'~ '5
QlED
(/)'E
III
E
c:
:;;
>
o
(!)
~
I)!
<:
8
"E
m
'B
m
iii
~
III
c:
E
,g
Ql
Cl
m
'"
01
c:
..!1!
c:
,12
~
""
'c
E
III
'0
5
'0
Ql
Cii
'0
0-
'"
III
=
=
'i
c'
,12
~
""
'c
E
III
'0
5
o
o
o
'"
"'.
0>
(0
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
'"
'"
c:i
(0
~
o
o
o
'"
'"
c:i
(0
~
-'
ai
c:
o
U
Ql
(/)
.5
Ql
Cl
m
'"
Cl
c:
..!1!
ce
c:
'en
'C:
o
Ql
=
'"
2l
m
c.
~
Q;
"E
o
Ql
01
c:
m
.c:
"
'"
:;:
I-
c:
.9
~
~ en
c: :5
m E
if~:J
ti
5
iii
Ql
Cii
'0
o
'"
'"
<c
o(l
Q;
.~
o
Ql ~
ce (0
'0 '"
c: g..t
i=..::o
Gi
'"
c:
ra
~
u
'0
~
Gl
.~
~
o
'"
~
'"
(:;
o
N
*'
o
o
o
';i!.
o
o
o
...
S
'"
,~ c:
~ III
Ql E
~ ~
QJ~~
g'ii:w
m c: ~
.c: 0 m
UU..J
'"
Ql
'6
'"
en
Ql
Ql
U.
1:)
m
a.
~
';i!.
o
o
o
!Ii
1:)
I)!
<:
8
"E
m
'B
m
iii
~
III
C
E
,g
Ql
01
m
'"
01
c:
..!1!
c:
,12
~
""
'c
E
Ql
'0
5
"0
Ql
Cii
R
'"
Ql
=
=
'i
c
o
~
""
'c
E
III
"0
5
';i!.
o
o
o
o
o
ai
(0
co
a5
....
(0
,..:
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
ai
co
co
a5
....
co
,..:
~
o
o
ai
(0
co
co'
....
co
,..:
~
..:
ai
c
,12
1:)
Ql
(/)
,5
Ql
Cl
m
'"
Cl
c:
1!!
ce
c:
'en
'C:
o
Ql
=
'"
2l
m
c.
~
Q;
"E
o
Ql
01
c:
m
fi
'"
:;:
I-
o
~~
Q...J
c:
o
'jg
m
0-
~
o
ti 0::
5 0
ft (!)
'E ~
~ O::NQ.
.g '<t ~ s,~
m"'",C:o::
.c8"'!"~u
~""OUC/)
Gi
'"
c:
l'll
.c:
u
'0
~
III
.~
III
>
o
'"
e
;;;
(:;
o
'"
'"
c:
.S!
'" ..;
':; ~
~I)!
1Il<:
= 8
= '"
'i 5
2l .:;
c: ~
m a.
"E III
@;,
m'"
5a
&r.i ~
o III
~li
. a.
- E
iii 8
5, .5
'" ...
<c 0
.2~
"'~
8J!!
N '"
.:;::1
_ m
~~
:!: =:
E~
,g,*
''0
~-
l'll c:
'O~
gs
eo
.?:-~
III III
c: >
'c 8
>.'"
.c:c
~ III
m.c:
'0-
c: .2
:B Q)
~-6
a.~
E ~
8 '"
~ ~
"" c:
~ .~
- c:
~ .Q
c: '"
(l> c:
1Hi
... (l>
III '"
"E:;:
0-
(l>tS
g'~
m c:
fi8
'"
:.c CD
1-=
'0
N
&.~
C:1:)
m (l>
'5~
o:c
~]
'~ Qi
III "'
> "'
o m
';i!.
-
co
ai
';i!.
o
o
o
o
'"
N
'"
..--
;
~
o
o
o
~
o
'"
N
'"
(0
ci
'<t
~
o
'"
N
'"
..--
;
~
c:
.12
-~
.~ ,~
c: ,-
m E
~~:J
'"
III
'6
:t
en
III
III
ti u.
5 1;
iii ~
fJ ~
'g ~
'" '"
~ 2l
o(l '~ E
Qi en G,)
~ N'E~
(l> '<tQl.!!!(/)
ce ~Cl:;~
'Oct"?;:!!!!!
~z13c38:3
'"
e
'<t
o
;;j:
o
'<t
!Ii
1:)
l!!
<:
8
"E
m
'E
~
~
III
c:
E
,g
III
Cl
m
'"
Cl
c:
1!!
c:
o
~
""
'c
E
III
"0
5
"0
(l>
Cii
"0
a.
:t
III
=
=
'i
c:
,12
~
""
'c
E
(l>
"0
5
..:
ai
c:
.S!
1:)
Ql
(/)
,5
III
Cl
m
'"
Cl
c:
..!1!
ce
c:
'en
'C:
o
Ql
=
'"
2l
m
Q.
~
:;;
"E
o
III
Cl
c:
m
~
"
'"
:;:
I-
Gi
c:
l'll
~
u
'0
~
III
'~
~
o
'<t L(j IJ:t. N
.-J.l.I 0 iP
'~t5
.;00
Z.....'"
Q)
E~Cl
Q)~ C'O
~..:::a.
C'O
"0
C
Q)
Cl
<(
'E
III
o
CD
Ql
==
o Ll'l
-9
al >-
_ III
ai~
'"
~
a.
i
.
Ql C
~~
~o
o E
;tg
"
~...
e 5
~ 0
li~
l:1-
III
G>
.~..
~~~
o~o
~;S
""c
:l ~ 5
>l5~
&0...
C
G> ... =
~~ 0
" .. E
.:0<(
o ...
"
G>
C e !S
~ 8: ~
="<(
0l:1_
III
.u C
C CI ~
1Il J= 0
5 l5 ~
00...
~
o
a.
w
II::
II)
II::
W
Q
II::
o
w
ell
~
o
w
~
i
l-
II)
Z
ii
~
c
~
1::
"
CL
G>
Q
G>
E 0
" 0 Z
zz
o u M
" G> J=
;~g
>a.o
~
Q
E
~~
~
o
o
c:i
~
o
o
c:i
~
r--:
;::
o
'"
M
tit
o
o
c:i
...
'"
co
r--:
;::
o
'"
M
...
'"
co
r--:
;::
o
'"
M
...
C
o
""
{!!
o
0.
'"
c:
eo::
1-0::
ci
Z
f ~
o~
&ti
lit
.: ...
oa.
Olc:
c:.!!!
'" a.
c: c:
.!!! 0
[L..
c: {!!
~&.
&.~Ql
,ge-
Qll-~
C> ~ 8,:3-
'2 ~ ffi ~
Ql '" 0:: 0
~ 2l c,N
'0, ,- c:_
c: ~.38:
UJ enc:1-
~ c:!!O::
co ~""ctIf..'l::::!..
III ~8,'5._Ql
0. "'c:",liji;j
~c(~]!ge>'8.
I-ZoUUO::l
Ll'l
~
S2
~
Ll'l
III
...
Ql
,~
~ .!!!
st:
~'ai
;.c "0
III ~
c:"
&.s
~~
~~
:5 III
III g>
,g~
~ e
-0.
b E
ft,g
g~~
./::",0
~~ ft
~al~
~~~
~ ~ ~
Ql 0. III
'" al E
~ '8 .!!!
'" E i;j
'::.!==
~-;'c
~.5 ~
c: .i! iil
8 2l g
Ql ~ ()
t: ,5 '"
>-.<:
cO '" C>
8 {j e
Nm=
M'<:~
~I-c:
~ . :;,
~g8
; No..~
-,-r=
S'28
S ~1l
~ ~ as
g ~ $
+:I -a...J
~ '2j S
E ~ al
~'O~
<1l Ql e
.e ,5 0.
Q)=2'-
=="iii
'" -B .a
1l <1l ~
~ .! ~
Ql I- Ql
... .&J
~~;;:
o 0 ~
QlNi;j
CJ).......c
c"--;
III Ql "0
-5.g.a
1! ts '"
I-~~
;'0
iiQj~
Cl "0 E
li ~ ~
'5 1l 'g.
'0 III ~
. ~ '"
.il! O.!!!
~alal
~ ~ '8
01- E
f#.
M
"1
~
f#.
'"
"1
~
~
co
Ll'l
.n
~-
~
.....
o
Ll'l
oci
N
,...
.n
0;;;
(;
M
Ll'l
co
0;-
N
q
0;;;
(;
M
Ll'l
co
aj
N
0_
0;;;
c:
o
""
{!!
o
0.
'"
c:
eo::
1-0::
...
-!l
III
~ ~
gir:
"" 0
.g:;
~ ~
III 0::
&l ,9
<.i Ql i
.5 g. e:-
o; ~ "0
c: " III
'5. c: Ii.
~ .5 c:
1l ~~'C
.5 M8:;,g>~
.!!! -r Iii Ql :2: 0::
2....u;)~Qj...JQ)
C:~,?Ill=lij.g>
~g~68ii:a:
Ll'l
o
;:::
~
co
,,;,
1
"
'1i)
1l
III
>-
i
'C
"0
~ 0
"0 c:
5,2
g>B
'515
c: Ql
~ fE
~~
c: Ql
III E
~"
e lij
~~
.~ ~
E C'
~ ~
III
0"0
III ~
o~
E?-'1i)
:;, c:
0.8
! .~
::-5
.2 ,-
ali
.~ c:
5-S
~ g
.!!! tS
Ol
.2 5l
,g]!
- 0.
III Ql
.~ ~
""-
::g1l
III III
Qla.
t::c
.Ql
~~
,g III
-a;:5
g 'j
tl':
~ B
'5 III
"Oc.
Ql ~
aI"
Ql c:
c: III
III c:
~~
III :;,
....2
~ 5l
o <1l
8,"5-
c: Ql
III Ql
-5~
,!!! a.
t:~
s
III
Gl '"
ClQl
li]i
.::: Ql
u "0
c;
!~
.~ ~
~"O
o~
f#.
~
~
u;i
'if'.
-r
"1
~
,
co
o
~
,...-
'"
co
.n
..,
...
~
cri
..,
0>
i
,...
!:!.
co
co
r--:
co
Ll'l
<ti
Ll'l
~
as
~
o
'"
cri
~
N
~
~
..,
...
0(1
'"
i!: u
~~:l
i!:
III
a.
iii
c:
o
'0,
Ql
0::
'"
Ql
C.
III
c: Z
o .<:
tl '5
2 z
~ t'--~
8NGJ8,a:
~~~!,
:;C:coo()()
Ll'l
~
i
,...
><
s
'"
J!
~
'0
c
Ql
[
III
0.
Ql
==
'"
Ql
>
III
'"
-5
:::
~
~
c:
:;,
o
U
Ql
==
>-
.&J
'"
Ql
'"
III
.<:
u
5
0.
iii
'C:
Ql
i;j
E
ts
~
'5
S
Ql
:;,
"
~
'E
o
Ql
Ol
c:
III
.<:
u
Ql
>
tl
:;,
al
"
'"
.!!l
en
:::
I-
Ii
~
"
.:
u
'0
!
~
5
Lfj :g~",
~~iti
ciocry
z'r"O,)
E~OJ
0,)"'" co
~""'a..
co
'0
c:
0,)
OJ
<(
'E
'"
o
!Xl
III
=
s~
i ~
1: '"
1Il:E
'"
~
a.
't:
a.
c(
I-
0::
o
D.
W
0::
m
0::
w
C
0::
o
w
C!l
Z
c(
:J:
tJ
W
2!:
i
?-
m
Z
2
c
c(
G1c'i
al l!! e g
;Sa.o
.ctJ a.E
tJE"'c(
~otJ...
.t:lil
&&
; :& ~
.c.c'tl
tJ';5
~fi
~u'E
GI '" ='
.! ... 0
> c E
~8c(
tit
..
" ... ;
~~ 0
I'll .. E
.cOc(
tJ tit
'tl
GI
C e ~
~ 8: ~
=''''C(
tJ~tIt
III
..
c 'J 5
GI I'll 0
t: ~ E
=' c
tJ8~
...
C
GI
E
1::
I'll
a.
GI
C
GI
E 0
I'll 0 Z
zz..
o 13 ~
'tl GI ~
C 'f" 5
~D.tJ
!!
I'll
C
E
~~
'if!.
o
o
d
'if!.
o
o
d
Il'l
C"l
00
C"l
co
ai
~
"'!.
;,;
o
o
d
...
It)
C"l
00
C"l
co
ai
~
-
tit
Il'l
C"l
00
C"l
CX!.
co
~
;,;
o
UJ
~J
o
z
i E
o~
&1)
;~
.c ..
tJD.
Ii;
i;j
~
I::
o
i;j
0>
0> ~~
I:: oC E
'C E: Q)
t i!: E
I:: >.Q.
'g> "'~.E
UJ It) Ql C E
lIJ~og>flSl
tlo'?jg~~
&;:!g0a.cn
Il'l
o
~
~
o
co
..
Ql
'E
o
Ql
0>
I::
'"
.c
'"
'"
:E
I-
Gi
~
~
o
E
~
'5
C'
l!
i;j
=
'"
""
'"
.!!l
B
,r:
.>i
2;
~
Ql
=
'0
~
:>
'0
~
Ql
>
'"
.c
Ql
Q.
8
'"
t;
.!!!,
E:
Q.
Ql
=
.r:
'"
Ql
0>
I::
'"
.c
'"
~
Ql
.c
~
'"
""
'"
.!!l
E
,g
'"
'0
I::
.<1
lIJ
Ql
~
~Lti
!!~
Q; Ll"J~
'E-
o 't:
Ql Q.
0><(
~ g
.c III
~ E
:.2'-
I- I::
,12
a;
.. C.
III E
~8
~~
U _
o~
~ I::
III Ql
.~ ~
~ ~
O"iii
'if!.
N
Lti
'if!.
C"l
,...
d
,...
'"
d
""
q
;::
q
""
tit
'"
N
~
'"
N
...
o
o
a;
N
'"
N
,...
co
M
...
'"
o
<Xi
'"
Il'l.
-
""
o
-.i
tit
o
UJ
:J...,
0...1
>.
I::
'"
Q.
E
o
(.)
I::
o
ts
2
1il
I::
o
(.)
t:
'"
en
0(1
I::
'ca
::!
~
2;
u.
-g .~
&::!
~.s
I:: Ol
~~
C"llllal
"'1Il:::E
~B~~~i2
uOC"(ctlOO
~~;gB<3&!
It)
o
:!:
~
'"
:c
Qj
"B
ra
>
I::
o
I::
o
""
'"
1il
Q.
E
:>
Q.
'0
Ql
I::
'ca
1:
'ca
E
>.
Q;
i;j
>
.'"
Q.
ra
E
,g
'"
'ca
E
~
.E
&:.
0>
,r:
1il
'x
Ql
III
=
'0
I::
,2 2!
~ 0
0.0
~~
Ql 0
=ts
VI l!!
3l:o
~N
'0""
'0'0
ra Ql
a5 :g
E ~
o Q.
&~
ffi~
"fi~
'" ~
:Et;
1-0:
I::
8
a; ttI
g>>.s
I'll Ql
.c :>
U'O
....'0
o ~
~ '5
III C'
.~ ~
~ ~
o ~
'if!.
0;
a;
I::
.Q
B
o
~
III
.c
I-
,;
ra
o
Ir
.c
'"
'"
Ql
III
'if!.
0;
a;
~
,..:
N
,...
ai
N
...
""
'"
,..:
N
,...
ai
-
...
o
o
d
o
o
ai
'"
;,;
o
o
d
o
o
ai
'"
tit
o
UJ
~J
1:
III
ci E
o B
'" '"
,2 Q.
t) &
2 ""
Ul '"
I:: '"
o I-
o '0
~ '0
'" c(
en ......0..
......;:G.ll-
~ ~ tn~
~","'1::1r
.B 0 C? <<I,...
~~;gBz
Il'l
o
~
~
~
o
o
-
1il
Ql
:>
C'
l!
~1:
I- :>
III
~~
o I::
~,g
III III
g-o.
>.E
= 8
.<1 Ql
1l=
~.g
o III
~x
... III
f5 g
;ai
.~ iE
_'E
I:: 0
E 2l,
B ~
"'.c
c.'"
;:2
=1-
i;j~
= ~
Ql
=
l!!
:>
VI
~ E
B.g
. III
lI= Q.
~.s
a. ~
I- '"
~ ~
Ir ~
o III
Z I::
>.1::
.cg
'0 '"
~ ,2:
l!! 1j
:0 III
'" I::
ra l!:
'" '"
Bal
.~ 'E
III III
'" X
1;j III
1::'0
~ ffi
:.0 en
'Ot:
'" 0
f!! Q.
III Q.
> :>
8 VI
Ii; ~~
E '5: ~
~]11;j
~~g
~~:c
'" III '0
tn .5 nJ
~]l~
",-
Ol..!!!
.... III
.. 0 Q.
& B E
:; :€ 8
ii:gB
"'It)
o~g
~-N
.!! al ai
~'O~
~ -5 ~
o .r: ::!
-4i~~.
~ie
..)o'C"J
Z.,-C'?
E~~
CIl""" co
::'""'0..
co
"0
C
CIl
Cl
<(
'E
tll
o
CO
CD
=
.s~
j~
iji::E
'"
E
a.
'1:
Co
<
.."Cl
II ; ~ C
1:1I I: 0 ::I
c::Ia.o
! U Co E
uE"C
';1.ou",
.t:u
III
II
&~..
Ii!,g
.cu..
UIIIO
';!!.:E
..
....
"Cl U 5
= ~ 0
'> C E
110<
13::u.,.
II .. g
~,g 0
.. .. E
.co<
U ~
"Cl
II
'C e 5
~ 8: ~
::I .. <
u8~
III
..
... 1:) C
; .G 5
t: C E
::I 0 C
Uu.,.
I-
13::
o
a.
w
13::
lI)
13::
W
o
13::
o
w
<.!l
Z
~
U
W
~
~
l-
ll)
Z
S
~
'C
II
E
t:
..
CI.
,!
ci
z
I~ zoi~
z~..o:z
"ulil~~
-811.bCII
;'~~!'[
>lI.uua.
s
..
o
E 0
~z
If!.
co
en
oi
If!.
co
en
oi
o
o
to
N
....
o
Il'l
....
o
C!
c;:;
v
iii
v
....
o
o
Ili
<"l
'"
iii
Il'l
V
....
o
o
Ili
<"l
'"
iii
Il'l
V
....
:;:.
C
CD
E
CD
Ol
tll
CIl c
t3~!::J
'"
c:
.2
:;
o
CIl
Ol
c:
'8>
tll
.5 Il'l ~ ~
fl ~ g'~
tll<l:"?<tI<t1
c%z8t3&
Il'l
o
;;r
....
~
....
....
~
.9
c:
CD
>
.E
>-CD
<tI.c
~:;;
ell <tI
e.c
ell~
'0 ~
g 0
~ ~
~ ~
Cl) _
.c ell
- C
:g :~
~ 0
o CD
.~ =
.>< c:
o :;
~ ~
(ij '"
c:c:;
B ,5
'6 C
'C Cl)
ell Cl)
Cl)J:J
J:. CD
f- ~
.J:.
~32
5 5
8 ~
~-g
o <1l
U E
~ Cl)
J2~
CD '"
ij:; C
8.~
i~
CD CD
.5 =
"'I: _
CD 0
c: CD
Cl) '"
u '"
S!12
(!) Ol
1!~
- <1l
S E
~ ,5:
0.-
= rJ
~:5 c
.~ ,!!l ~
~5~
'" ~ '0
~.!!l '"
:8~li
'6 . E
'al ~ l!!
~ ~':;
J2 <1l cr
'" i;j 1!1
.;: "'C "C
CD c: C
'E ~ <1l
o c: ~
~~ B
~ Q) ~
-5 :5 .5
'" c:-
:E;1!
f- fl:::
tll 0
c..~
8, 15 ~
c;;: ~
..~=
'fii;j:2
o=~
II .... Cl)
CII ~J:J
.~ ~ ~
~ "S 5
c5 e u
~
<I:
If!.
co
co
r-.:
If!.
N
r--
to
r--
co
o
'"
o
ai
o
C!.
....
....
....
co
~
Il'l
<'i
'"
....
Il'l
N
N
v
<"l
iii
<"l
en
....
'"
o
r-.:
....
Il'l
.n
v
en
....
::Eo::
~o::
.9
Cl)
c: Cl)
B~
rJ 0
... E
:j:; E
ffi:::.
Cl)'C
CO <1l
8.&
rJ C
",.9
'C '"
C Ol
<tI ,5:
...J>~
~::J l!!
5 ~ ::J
.l'!!<"l1l'l-:;80:~
E"-~~4iBS
~~1!~~U
J:~ouu::E.9
Il'l
o
as
~
N
....
(ij
C
o
'U
1!1
'6
'"
'C
'C
<1l
-g
<1l
C
o
.,
.l!l
'"
C
o
""
<1l
Ol
:1;
c:
<1l
'C
C
<1l
'"
(ij
'C
~
<1l
E
c:
tll
i5..
'"
~
CD
Qi
'C
o
'"
(ij
:::
Ili
o
o
N
....
<"l
>-
<1l
::E
.9
~j
g Ol
~ c:
i5...l'!!
E 0.
8f6
(ij'3
oS .5
tiC;;
~.9
c: :E
8 ,~
Cl).c
= Cl)
"':0
"Cl <1l
~a
x fl
CD (.)
Ci; <1l
'E ~
o 0
Ql -
g'Qi
tll >
-5.9!
U'J '0
:2 '"
f- Cl)
:5
CD
'"
in~
~.9
!:!::
U"Cl
oi:i:
1l"Cl
.!! ~
~ '"
~j
If!.
8
o
If!.
o
o
o
~
~
&
;;
o
o
o
....
~
....
co
Il'l
Il'i
~-
....
....
~
co
Il'l
iii
~-
....
....
::Eo::
~o::
"Cl
g 21
,- 0::
B .2
tiS'al
=0::
tll-
Cl)"
CO <1l
8.&
~ c:
t/).e _
'C"''C
C Ol <1l
.5.5: &
~:3
c: c: ~
V 8'" <1l:2
<1l ....CD 0:0::
"S:!:~C1l-Gi~
c: t'-r- C"') C:.S:! -.-
CCI~=~a..
~lS~t38::E.9
Il'l
!2
co
....
~
<"l
....
;;i
Cl)
=
cr
l!!
~
CI.
~
..
Ql
'E
o
Cl)
Ol
C
<1l
.c
<.l
'"
'"
fl
e
0.
.9
~
Dl
'"
fl
Cl)
c:
.!!l
"Cl
c:
<1l
~
....
CD
'E
o
CD
Ol
C
<1l
.c
<.l
E
,g
al
;;
E
o
'"
<1l
~
Ql
i;j
'C
Cl)
.c
I-
Ili
o
o
N
N
>-
<1l
::E
.9
~
<1l
'C
Ql
=
'"
'C
C
~
Ql
Ci;
'E
o
Cl)
Ol
c:
<1l
-5
'"
:E
f-
Gi
~
III
.c
u
'0
II
CII
.~
~
o
~ L.O tr- Il'l
UJOlij)
tOOk
.....NlW
. . C")
OOC")
Z"-
Q)
Eiti'Cl
Q)~ro
:::: n..
ro
"0
C
Q)
Cl
<(
'E
III
o
(D
III
=
.e~
11 ~
'E III
1ll:E
'"
l!!
a..
'C
Co
c(
....
a:
o
D..
W
a:
lI)
a:
w
o
a:
o
w
(.!)
z
~
U
w
i:!:
....
~
....
lI)
z
i
o
c(
III C
lJI~
Ii ::l
,cU
U E
~ 0
,j:
&&
c i G
Ill,c"
,cU"
U III 0
~;S
~uc
= 1! ;
~8~
a:U...
III C
lJI .. ::l
C " 0
III .. E
,cO~
u
...
"
III
C ~ 5
~ ~ ~
::l III c(
ug...
III
-
- c
ii l;l ~
t: b E
::lc~
u8...
C
III
E
t:
III
Co
III
o
III
E 0
III 0 Z
Zz
t;
o u ca
"Illb
c "e's
~D..U
.!l
III
o
E 0
~Z
"
:-
e 3
CoO
CoE
"c(
8'"
III
';Ie
o
o
o
';Ie
o
o
o
Lt'l
C")
.n
00
C")
,....
m
"<
Lt'l
C")
...
o
o
o
...
Lt'l
C")
.n
co
"<
,...
m
C")
.,.;
C")
...
Lt'l
C")
.n
00
M
,.:
m
"<
Lt'l
C")
...
:E
(,)0::
~o::
ci
Z
..
.. III
" E
o~
Ill_
lJI U
C
~ f
UD..
'0
.sa
~
III
Q.
0>
U)
III
'0
~
"
.sa
'"
Cl
c
~ ~
0> '0
~ "
'6> Lt'l u '"
Jj G?0>2:g
:E !S (0 g> u; e-
uce'?(QCQ)
:E~~ti8o
Lt'l
o
a;
~
o
~
-
l!!
'"
'"
E
~
.r:
(5
(D
o1i
c.
'5.
E
o
u;
a..
(,)
0::
b
to
..
./2
E
~
III
~
'"
'"
'0
'0
III
'0
C
III
III
c.
'5.
w
a..
o
:c
b
(0
..
./2
~
'E
III
::l
C'
C
'"
Q,
~
'"
::l
'5'
'"
'0
C
'"
'E
0>
E
u;
::l
'5'
III
~
'E:
0.
III
..
./2
'"
~ E
iii~
a; III
'E~
~ ~
Ol",
~~
~<
:2 E
""'0
Q.
.. E
III ::l
lJI..J
Ii~
,c-
U E
'O,g
~'O
III 0>
.~ g
~'O
o~
';Ie
o
o
o
';Ie
o
o
o
Lt'l
C")
.n
co
C")
,....
Cl
C")
.,.;
M
...
o
o
o
...
Lt'l
C")
.n
co
C")
,.:
Cl
C")
.,.;
C")
...
Lt'l
C")
lri
co
C")
,.:
Cl
C")
.,.;
C")
...
:E
(,)0::
~o::
'0
.sa
~
'"
Q.
III
en
III
'0
~
"
0>
iii
"
c
~ ~
0> '0
~ "
~ G?~~~
:E!S~g>u;e-
UO I~g~
:E~~(,)(,)O
Lt'l
o
o
!:::!
~
o
Lt'l
-
E
.sa c
~5
OlE
E: '"
'E: 0>
1I>.r:
iii-
~g
'00
0>0
,~ ~
coo
11>'"
X >.
II>Qi
~ ii
E
~.;(
.2 E
0.0.
E 0.
O>~
'0 0 E
~ ~~
~ .~ ~
.~ rn =:
.r: _ ~
f- 8 Iii
'ri '" ~
,g .5 g
Q):=<
E ::l E
Q) ~ ~
~ Q.
g'i E
8-g.3
~~~
'" E u;
1 ~.~
<lI f- Ol
~t::~
'i1ll8,
III ~ i6
.cu.c
- )( u
'" 0 III
:g.c.c
III III
'0 = 'i
c... '"
~ ~ E
~o~
uu=
c 2 0
8~(D
~ 8 ~
'" III 0
o;~
c: Q.1 '3
.2 ]i ,g
Q) ::: B
Qi 'g ;:;.
'1:J__+:I
III 0 c
:5 ; ~
.g=CT
CI)~~
~ 0> U
.Q~(D
1;3 en C
Q; c: 0
~~~
0> C '"
g>8~
~~~
13
:E ~.5
f- 'iii ~
o '"
-.r:
..'0'0
aa ~ :;
~IllO
III ~ ~
,c '6>;:;'
U E: C
(; CO ::3
~158
..
.~ ~ ~
= ii 10
0==
~
o
,...
-
';Ie
,...
-
o
o
oj
c;;
~
to
CO
...
o
o
o
o
o
o
...
o
o
oj
c;;
~
Lt'l
CO
...
o
o
oj
-
Cl
~
Lt'l
CO
...
'"
III
Ie
'0
LfJ
'"
~
'~
II>
U)
~
::l
U
.sa
:2
J:j ~~
~ O~
ell ~ ~~
o/S ?!lME",
Qi ""1llS,$
.JIl: (001'- Q.
ii~~Iii~~
-5~cC..c:Q)"",
enLt'lm(,)O::./2
Lt'l
o
o
!:::!
~
~
l!!
III
'"
~
.~
III
'"
~
C
III
Iii
.0
'0
C
'"
u;
.Sl
III
.c
f-
.:
,2
'"
c
III
~
W
C
III
a:
>.
~
III
C
w
1'!
c
III
(,)
;:;.
E:
::l
o
(,)
j
'0
(,)
III
=
..
./2
'"
~
.~
~ .:
Olo
l: 'US
'0 c
c '"
.!2~
1J III
-g :!
III III
~=
~~
.sa '0
.. 0
$ E
"= E
~ @
./2 III
Xl .s
'0 ~
.~ ~
0.:2
.. u
III III
'E=
0...
II> 0
Olc
c 0
Ill""
'fi ~
.5!l c-
.c 0
""' ..
III
Q.
!:
a; c.
I:lll!!
C ::l
III '"
.c c
U 0>
'0.9
~ ~
.!! ~
~ '"
: ~
o E:
'<:tL{")~",
.-lU 0 iil
~lti
.,JO'<:t
Z..-M
Er;~
Q):2 ro
:: 0..
ro
'0
c
Q)
C')
<(
'E
III
o
CD
CIl
;;
BLl)
'C~
~ nl
CIl::!E
'"
~
a.
l
"Cl
C II
8,! > c
c .. e ::I
II :l Cl. 0
.cCJ Cl.E
CJE"<I:
';1.08'"
.t:l:ll
Gl
&~..
C " Gl
1I.c"Cl
.cCJ"
CJIllO
;e.:c
..
""'c
ll: !! is
- =0 E
~ <I:
"'CJ...
" .. ~
~~ 0
III .. E
.cooC
CJ ...
"Cl
Gl
= ~ 5
~ 8: ~
::l III oC
CJ8'"
ID
"c U 1:
III :l
~ J:l 0
~ 6 ~
CJCJ...
Ii
o
a.
w
a::
m
a::
w
c
a::
o
w
Cl
Z
oC
:I:
CJ
w
i:!
i
?-
m
Z
!i
c
oC
=
Gl
E
1::
III
Cl.
c!
o
Z
~ oj Gl
1lI0:io~
ZZt; Z
ou';&'U
],~c li.~
IU .. 0 .c ....
>a.CJCJa.
.!l
III
C
E
:!~
'i!f!.
,...
~
-
,
'i!f!.
""
v
c:::i
CD
""
c:::i
o
en
.n
""
Ll)
ai
N
...
Ll)
CD
cD
<0
,...
tD
N
-
...
v
N
,...
""
..j
en
ai
N
...
""
~
;;:;
-
ai
o
v
ai
N
...
'"
CIl
E
'fi
LL3
'iij
...,
'"
CIl
Q.
c: III
o z
'l3 '0
2 c:
'lil C"l.9
c: C"ltl
8CD~8,.s
~8C)1~~
:.::~~t38
Ll)
o
23
I:::!
~
,...
-
CIl
;;
~
'e
5l
e!
a.
~
c:
CIl
0>.
:S 2l
c: c:
8.!1!
tl1l
.!!!. CIl
e~
0.'0;
i! 8.
- nl
E 0
,g-
c:ts
~ nl
e!.Q
'C ~
.?;o~
~ g'
.~ 'E
~ 8
o.CIl
~.c
~g.
'C '1:
c: .Q
nl 0
1j1;
.~ e!
e _
0. c:
Cll 8
;; Cll
s=
~ .s
o>Cll
c: '"
nl nl
fj ~
CIl .5
.~ c:
tl III
-6 .5:
Cll'C
'C1!1
'E ::l
: ~
:e ~
'C.c
alE!
CIl III
-g~
(j.Q
.s ~
Ci5~
"Em
0'0
CIl c:
~ .!!2
~~
",j
;S
'0 2l
c:
1i~
~~
Q)~
c: III
CIl 0>
.c Cll
I- c:
III
iii
it .~
~~
" c:
.c Cll
1.I 0>
'O.j
~ c:
Gl 8
.~ 1j
~ '[
'i!f!.
It')
<t
ex?
~
.
N
It')
<?
en
o
..;
N
rt:i
CD
o
~
...
Cil
en
~
N
C"l
ai
o
~
E
<C
CD
,..:
CD
It')
tD
Ll)
-
~
CD
o
c:::i
Uli
r-:
en
<C
.n
<t
...
c:
o
~ .~
~ ~
~~:J
~
III
a.
'"
Cll
Q.
nl
c: Z
~ €
.s ~
~ CD~
8 g; 8,0::
~~~!~
:'::CDOUU
It')
e
~
~
CD
-
'i!f!.
'<T
CD
qi
'i!f!.
N
Ltl
-
,
en
o
..;
C"l
N
,..:
;
".;
'Of
...
><
.!!!
'"
~
III
'0
'E
CIl
~
nl
0.
Cll
;;
'"
Cll
>
III
'"
.c
l.l
:c
~
~
::l
8
Cll
;;
>-
.Q
'"
CIl
'"
nl
.c
!:?
:>
0.
~
'C:
.Sl
nl
E
tl
~
'C
.s
CIl
:>
'C
Q;
'E
o
CIl
0>
c:
nl
.c
l.l
CIl
:B
:>
'C
Cll
'C
nl
.!II
'"
:c
I-
s
o
c:::i
cx:l
Ol
o
"-
co
'e
<C
CD
cD
cx:l
Ll)
r-:
Ll)
-
~
...
en
o
..;
-
N
rt:i
cx:l
o
;"
....
c:
o
oIl';
~ ~
~&J
~
~
'"
CIl
Q.
nl
c: Z
~ €
.s ~
'" .>t.
c: en III
8 g; 8,iX
=~;;:;~@
e!o~.c::!E
:'::CDOUU
Gi
Cl
c:
III
.c
1.I
'5
~
.!
~
~
Ll)
~
I:::!
~
Ol
-
><
.!!!
rIJ
~
III
'0
'E
CIl
~
nl
0.
CIl
;;
'"
CIl
>
III
'6
:c
~
~
c:
:>
o
U
CIl
;;
>-
.Q
'"
5l
nl
.c
!:?
:>
0.
~
.C:
.!
nl
E
tl
e!
'C
B
CIl
:>
'C
Qi
'E
o
CIl
0>
c:
nl
.c
l.l
CIl
>
13
:>
'i
'C
nl
.!II
'"
:c
I-
Gi
Cl
C
"
.c
1.I
'5
~
.!
~
~
o
-.:tUJt:t-...
lUOIll
COO~
.,-NlI:'
. O"UJ
~..-M
Q)
E ~Ol
Q) "'" C1l
::::""'0..
C1l
"0
C
Q)
Ol
<(
1:
Ol
o
CD
III
-=
.9U'l
-09
.s ~
Iii~
III
~
Q.
;:
ICI.
e(
~
c:::
o
a.
w
c:::
III
a:
w
o
c:::
o
w
C)
z
~
t)
w
~
...
~
~
III
Z
i
o
e(
-
~f
c "-
Ol :I
.&:t)
t) E
~g
~~
c: ; i
.!.&:~
t)~O
~~
"Clue
= f! 5
'S: 1: E
III 0 e(
C:::t)...
AI _ ~
g'-! 0
ol "- E
.&:Oe(
t) ...
"CI
~ c
C e ~
~ 8: ~
:I ol e(
t)~...
ID
-1:
C ~ :s
~ -= 0
:I C ~
t)8...
-
~
ol
a-
III
o
o
z
CD :u CD
~o~~~
zz_oz
... ... U G.I ...
o 41 ol = 41
-g '~'E ;.~
~c:8c3&:
.!
ol
o
E
~~
"CI
~ -
e ;
a-o
ICI.E
Ole(
~...
ID
~
U'l
CC!
1f!.
U'l
CC!
Ol
...
M
;1;
ai
Ol
to
<ti
...
o
co
oj
(0
o
ci
N
-
....
Ol
Ol
M
...
Lt'l
ai
to-
"d'
<ti
...
Ol
Ol
M
to-
Lt'l
ai
to-
'"
<ti
...
o
w
ir~
e:
.2
ti
E
III
e:
o
l)
~
Ol
Ui
e:
'iij
~
~
o
u.
!!!
Ol
.c
in
Q; ;$jIllCD
.r::.PJ~~.$
B- tCOt:
~~gt3~
U'l
o
i];
~
"d'
o
o
N
>-
.c
-0
.!
III
III
'"
0"
~
III
Ol
III
'E
III
E
lS
c:
Ol
.c.
c:
III
ti
III
'e-
o.
~
.g
-0
e:
Ol
III
c:
.g
'E
8
'C
Q;
lJ:
'C
III
Ol
c:
Ol
.c.
"
.9
Ql
'"
'C
'E
Ql
E
c:
.2>
n; <Ii
III Ql
e: Ol
:= c:
Ql Ol
.~ -5
.9 5l
~~
Ol _
E 5
III .c.
c: ::::
.2 ~
Bll
~11
o 0.
E E
'0 8
-:;15
eg
0l'C
.~ "3
III 8
"Eti
o Ql
III '2'
g>o.
Ol III
.c..c.
t.l ~
11~
~ Ol
III
'E
.. Ql
~~
li ~
.&: III
"0
a Q1
J 16
.!!! ~
~ .!
III III
~~
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
'"
...
oj
...
co
i
(0
..:
'"
....
o
o
o
...
'"
...
oj
...
co
i
(0
..:
'"
...
'"
...
oj
...
co
.,f
o
(0
..:
'"
....
~
l)o::
~o::
E
,g
N
(0
co
c:::'C
8~
~~
&8
i 13.8
Q) m 01
.s::. CD:E
'$ "3
~ U'l1ll:eQ.
U"-~ O)Q)t
<(Lt'l",lij'CO
Q. 0 , .c. Ii5 ,~
<(~;;l)><(
U'l
o
i];
~
"d'
o
N
~5:'
+=>l)
:~ l)
-ge:.
.5 8-
,i '5.
III ~
III '"
III l:l
:2 ~
~ 0.
o III
ue1
~ g
'E 8
8 Ol
1Il:S
.s::. III
- 'x
'0 III
-8..9
'00 .~
~:S
E ~
: .~
E 2l
,g Iii
Ql .~
.~ ~
16 Q)
'E Ol
5l .5
~ ~
o..s::.
~ '0
Ol c:
Q)'C
~ 8
.s::. ~
.s
11::'0
~ (5
en'tJ E
~ ~.~
58~
.~ Q,) =
25-='i'
,f.s~
;?:olll-
e: 1: lS
S ~ ~
l) ~ ::
>-:5..2
~'~ <
~;?:O~
~ c: ;c
g"se
~l):)
l!l~1
u--
~"E~
~ ~ 'n;
~0l0l
Q) Q) '"
"Em-c
o III III
III ;: ~
g>~il
~~~
u "'.c
III 0"_
~~~
.~ 0
.s::.o
~M
Q;a.:~
g'l) to-
!al)...
'fiC-'O
.... g' CI)
o :.c ~
~ ,~ ~
.- Q) U
~ 1Il.5
1Il.c. III
~s~
Agenda Item No. 161.4
May 10, 2ifot
Page 36 of 57
........=~
",. , " . , " N(lUJU
~. <
.
-
.Ul"._. 1A.6!J!t
..
..n III r....... '" ~..-c OPt
, IIIiJJlUJIIU. .... ..... " III '~..
'ill] III..~ ",J""f-~
.......,.-..- ~ --- -- ~....
:.~r.-~~ ..WIJ.~' .---~ II.. UI~."".
, i'".l,'
.'-~.-
Ilr
...... "lit'. ""
"'iWI~
-.....
~. ". "J'O'~'"
"'. '. ... -- .
.... " ,,-' '". "..,.~n. " .,,;,. .,' ':., ~..........
~...F '. ,.','
',. 3-; .
.,;~.,../:.'.~.-~:; :" '.!
Agenda Item No. 16~
May 10, ~.
Page 37 of 57
, ,
_..,~
.'..~ ..
~jW ...-.wi 1:aA28
%
.. ..... .WIdW 10" ~... to aoc ..
'....... ...~ .... rWfItr 1tt .. ~
':~'. ";,~~/1f~iJlUlurU~~ d ~/1-o~ '.
1.:~rr~'~~:l."~':;:;,~-:i~':( -:'" '.
, I',' " , , "'!It;~., Jil,r t . ,DJiI..t:b 1. lIJdItr r-a-ClM fM.clWn8t
. .~ :.~ ,
......'...l)jll ~"
..~....'... ..J...........
,QIiIk ~ ~(f 0 ~Qf_
'.:, .,..?--~()-tP1'
~.' ..;;' ./
~.... .
.,.....-''',.,
Agenda Item No. · ~4
May 10, m;5
Page 40 of 57
-"'~
CONTRACT IIODIFlCAOON
CHECKLISTFQRII
PROJECT .NAMe ~ .SenriCesfot MlIIroDOIftaiI PIIInmnd Olaanlzatlon Lona-Ra..-
Tnu.._1:l.6.... Plan ,~'~ 2130 'lJDdabI
PROJECT tt
BlDlRFP ~ 04a11
pO * 4&00037586
iIbD "= 1
WorltOrder~
AMOUNT QF'THIS CHAMGE"
CONTRACT AMOUNT:ORIGIIMLl,HO.717. CURRENT $380.717~.
,~1IQIffl .. ..,' ' flllCWDlllG1'HI8'ClilANGEORDER;)
La8t BOC I(pproved ~ s' ,.360.717.. '
(LMTTfiAL._~lIGBCC~
Date of Last ace Approval 1122104 Agenda liEI # ,10 B
oumUlatl\tt oetW...' ofCbaritJe Ont.... to .. CORbalWOlkOrder:. ...
~ Of'....~n_.CtJtlWrtt co~ amount ~
FOrmula: (CUn8nt ~ItaSt Bee apProved amount)-1
R_.. 81dActions:1f1f1e cha.nge'.excMds 1~:aoc ,appnmiiia ~uncter 10% ~ to aoc.',d
PurchllSing repotl, For speoIftc mfCl'lr1ndanreprtIAg WDlic ....thl'8$hdlds..pieaee ,. to the C~Utiaa;( ,
AtfiTIiriistratiOn ~. section m.C.4 '
cURRENT COMPI..E'IlON OATE{S}:ORIGtNAL: 11l13i.ZboS CURftENT: 1t13i2006~
SOIlllARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): E1d8nd conllar4.tim. out.. mu.4I.
JUSl1F1CATJON FOR CHANGE f~
"twGinO .
PART'IES CONTACTED aEGARDJNGTHE CHANGE: Ti'"
(pI'OI8ct,Mana.-d. :Lee CountY'MPO 01......
illPt.EIIENTATION STEPS ev8I'ifJ uelt IMIII'om prudIlecIiRIw1II1 chItAOe.... Y.N or NtA)
y ~ L. . .~ _;::a. '""'- of...... ....:., ...............
Q . .~.cnangelS~I>>_g,'lIQ~I"~1D scope' ,\1'1"'" lIPCIl:Kdll..............-...
~ 'Proposed change':ls Jrt faet... addition or d$IetIon1o'1he '.... eoape
~ CbaAge is beingimplEin1C!d8d In a manner consistenhVilh N ~~,
, The appropd8te.partJes haw been ~Ited ".rdinQ the :c:tIanIJe, '.
KPropos:ed prices, fees ard coatis set forth in thechana8 ar.e reasonable
PROJECT MAMA ' . RECOMIIE:HDAll0H:
Revised 9/1 ' .
0.. 1)1qr
0lIte: I '
'~4"L ~/\S JP::;
Agenda Item No. ftE4
May 10, 5
Page 41 0 7
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKUST FORM
PROJECT NAME: UvL...... RftAII De..- 1 & 21RR lID PI... RIdaII ~, PROJECT'" 800714
BJDlRFP -= oe.as1 MOO I:
3
AMOUNT OF TtI8 CHANGE' 11.721.10
PO If: 4IOQO'l""1
Wort Older IJ: NlA
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINA.L.S".II2..00t CURRENT $--1.041.=
(a'TM'IWI POIIT) (IJICLUtiiii..... ORDI!IIQ
lat see Approftd AmountS ~~........ -=CAPMOVAL)
DID Df Lat Bee Approval J........ AgMda..... 118-20
CurnulalJve ~ v.... ole...... ~ to thJe C~lfIb-tlW~ Order:, 11......
Percentage of the cIIangtJ ~_. CUI'IWIt contract .......---L%
Formula: (Curreri AmOII1t I Last Bee IIPPrOved M1OW1t)-1
Re8UIta and Ac:tions: If the ch8nge exceeds 10% see ~ II required; Imder 10% reported to ace on
Purchaing report. For tp8CifIc lnform8tIon I"8g8Idlag work order ttnlholdl. please refer to the ConIr8ct
Admlnietratian Proc:edtna, Section III.C.4.
CURRENT COMPlETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: 1. Dava
CURRENT: 112 Dos
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (a): IdMIIfv ~ ~e:= =:' c: ;.~:::
.... -wa_ a 10 ~ ~ - FOIIIIWn CRa IIIGII -. ~ :ii:
PI-. Founlllln '~I P~ al Total -111.- _ .; ~ ~-=..". ~ ~
111.721.10 maN tit'" 4:....L-"
JU811FICATlON FOR CHANGE (8): What val.. or ........ do ...... ~ pnwIde 10 the projKt?
BorIna...........1o ~ ........ ___walk and .........If. FountaIn"lIIIiMd un......- -.... In
RMMIkNa Pond a..... .... DI8IU:L 1,Ift __......
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Bob '-'_rMI\. --. F..... P...... LuIIch. Mi.
---.. ... 0... HaM....
IIIPLEIIENTA~ STEPS (Vwtfy MCh bdn' ptOCMdIng willi ..... qatng Y, N or NlA)
..Y PropoMd c;t,.1ge Is CDnIiltent with the scope (If the exIating IIgI'8eIMnt
..:t. Propoeed chMge is in fact....lMtdItion or'detetlon to the exletIng. scope
...:t. Change is beq)implemenled In . manner oonaistent with the exIIItIng IIgFMment
..:J.. The appropri8te P8I1ies Mve been coneuIIIlcI rwgardIng the challg&
.::t. Propoeed pricelr, feel and .coeta, aet forth In the dwIge .. ..-enable
PRO-JECT AnoN: ThIa fonn .. to be elgfWd and dat8d..
l>-:l!)
APPROVE BY:
REVIEWED BY:
hvised 12123/04
~."":,.,,.
,.
RPR-07-2005 15:38
COll I ER CO PRK
e
e
P.1a2
Agenda Item No. 16~
May 10, 2
Page 42 of 5
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: NORTH NAPLES REGIONAL PARK PROJECT ,: 80102
BIDlRFP': 01-3118 MOD t: 7 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE (-$714,841.12)
PO II: 4100037217
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $13,802,&45 CURRENT 14I,1f7 .140.08
(ITM'I'ING POIN'1') (lMCLuaHG THII ~ DIaA)
Last BCC Approved Amount $48,191,587.88
(LAlTTOTAL AfIf,lIIQUlfIING ICC APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval: 21812005 'Ag.n.. Item 4# 16(0)3
Cumullltlve Dollar Vlllue of Change Orders to thle Contract 1-8,101,104..12
Percentage of the ohange ovar/Under ourrent contract amount: -8.11%
Formula: (Current Amount I Last BOC approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: " the ohange exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
purchasing report. For epeclfic information regarding work order thresholds. pi.... refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.C.4.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGlNAL: 51101200I CURRENT: 511012001
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): identify the changes. Thle ct.ductlvw change order 17 Ie
usoclated with the Direct Mat8r181e Purch_ of matBrlale dlrecdy from the project vendora of the
North Napl. _lonaI Park conetruotlon project. By dlIductlno the direct CCNda of cerblln .........
form Kraft Construction's purch_ order and purohaslng dlrwotly tom the vendor, the County's able
to ave the 1% florida Sa" Tlx on the pu~. In thla ~, the ..In... on the f714,I4I.22 of
purch..e lIquala Ippraxlmately 140,400 In tax ..vlngl to the COUnty. Collecllwly III change 0......
add up to $8,105,104.92 which equate. to an Ippraxlmllte tax aavlngs of. 458,000 to the County.
JUsnFlCAll0N FOR CHANGE (8): What value or beneftt do theIe ohan..- provldll to the projllat?
exhibit 0 of the Contract .. out the procedure for executing the Direct .'-.11 Puroh_ of
goods. This Change Order Ie conelldent with the contrect'l procedUIW IUICI 'S In ooncert with 1M
County'. policy or Slles To ..vlnge thru dlnlCl pure"". Th.. aevee the County significant amounte
of money.
.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Plrks IInd ReoreatIon Director, Public ServIce8
Aclmlnlstntor, Purchasing Contracr. Specialist, Clerks Fln.noII Department Special Praf80ta
Coordinator
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verttv MCh b41forll proceeding with ohange uelng Y, N or NlA)
Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the exll1lng agreement
Y Proposed change is In fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
Y Change Is being Implemented In a manner consistent with the exlstlng agreement
Y The appropriate parties have been con8ulted regarding th_ change
Y Proposed prien, feel and oOlte eet forth In the chang- are reasonable
PROJECT MAN R D ION: Thle form II to be .Igned
APPROVED B . Date:
R
REVIEWED BY: Date:
R.evised 12/23104
; ,
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
Agenda Item No. 16E4 ,
May 10, 20~
Page 43 of '7Jl
PROJECT NAME: Pelican Bay Fire & Imaation Water System Imorovements PROJECT #: 74023
BID/RFP #: 00-3051
MOD#:
6
AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $ 0.00
PO #: 006127
Work Order #: N/ A
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 342.214.15 CURRENT $ 1.318.838.35
(STARTlNG POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
Last BCC Approved Amount $ 1.318.838.35
(LAST TOTAL AUT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval Aoril 10. 2001
Agenda Item # 16 C (13)
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractlWork Order: $ 976.624.20
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount 0 %
Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount}-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to Bce on
Purchasing report. For specifiG information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.C.4.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: JulY 1. 2003
"'4f..
CURRENT: Aoril15. 2005
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Identify the changes. Adiustment of estimated amounts fo
performance of Tasks A-6. A-7. A-10 and A-16
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the
project?Provides a more accurate estimation of the cost to perform the identified tasks.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Finance (Lisa Elliott). Focus Enaineerina
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N1A)
--X..- Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
-1i- Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
--X..- Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
--X..- The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
--X..- Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
Date:
Date:
'f- /c(fi
Revised 12/23/04
~
Agenda Item No. ~
May 10, 5
Page 44 of 7
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKUSTFORM
PROJECT NAME: GoodIette Frank Raed FM and RWM PROJECT 1#: 72002
BIDJRFP I: 04-3646 MOD I: 3 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $29.442.61
PO I: 4500029488 Work Order ,: NlA
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 3.872.929 CURRENT S 4~ .040.87
(8TMT1NG POINT) (INCUJDING CHANClI! ORDER)
LIMIt see Approved Amount' 3.872.929
(LAIT1OTAL AIIT. AIQURNQ IICC APPROVAL)
om. of Last see Approval
Mav 11. 2004
Agenda Item 1# 16C1
Cumulative Dollar V..... of Ch8nge Ordere to title ContractJWork Order:' 198.111.67
Percentage of the change over/under cu.....nt contr8Ct amount o:mn.u
.s./2-
-tr
%
Formula: (Current Amount I Last Bce approved amount)-1
Results and AotIone: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval Is required; under 10% reported to Bce on
Purchasing report. For specific Information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Adrnlnlltlatlon Procedures, Section III.C.4.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: Februarv 3. 2005 CURRENT: Mav 4. 2005
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (8): Idatlfy the ell..... To ~locate the existius 6' force main
on VBR due to a conflict with the orooosed 42" Directional Bore.
JUsnFlCAnoN FOR CHANGE (8): What value or benefit do theee, changes provide to the project?
The contractor had to relocate a er force main from a privately maintained pump station in order to build
42" force maln a8 Intended by the contract documents. This ohange was not anticipated at the onset. Funds
are available In the budget to cover this change.
PAR11ES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Bill Mullin. PrlnctD81 Prefect Mansoer. Mike Dlckev
Johnaon Enalneerlna.
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (V..1fy tNIch before proceeding with change using Y, N or N1A)
..:L Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
..:L Proposed change Is In fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
..:L Change Is being Implemented In a manner conslatent with the existing agreement
..:L The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
l Proposed prloea, fees and costs set forth In the ohange are reasonable
{
REVIEWED B :
APPROVE BY:
Date: #'1/0\'--
Revised 12123104
Agenda Item N~ VJE4
May 2 05
Page 57
CONTRACT MODIFICAnON
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: NCRWTP Acid Tank ReDlac:ement PROJECT #: 700841
BIDlRFP #: 04-3871 MOD It:
PO I: _4500031070
1
AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $
19,727.64
Work Order .:
NA
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ _189,OOO.OO_CURRENT $218,727.84
(lTAR'I'ING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
Lut BeC Approved Amount $ 199,000.00
(LAIT TOTAL AMT. Fll!QUIFIINQ 8CC APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval_June 22, 2004
Agenda Item # 16 0 9
Cumulative Dollar Val.. of Change Orders to thla ContractlWork Order: $218,727.84
Percentage of the change over/under current contract lU1IOunt 8.91_%
Formula: (Current Amount I Last BeO approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval Is required; under 10% reported to BeC on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, SectIon 11I.0.4.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: Auaust 18. 2004
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (8): identify the changes.
CURRENT: Mav 18. 2005
REVIEWED BY:
Conr:
Time extension due to hurricane delays during fall 2004 which resulted In a longer rental time and expense for
use of Baker Tank. Due to plant request. change to sequence of work resulted in additional crane activation,
and adding strainer basket and pipe supports.
JUsnFlCATlON FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do the88 changes provide to the project?
ReDlacement tank will be fullY ODeratlonal
PARTlE8 CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: John Losch~~~~ & :: Construction: Steve
Messner. NCRWTP Plant Manaa~r: Lvn Wood. Purchaslna: Rov Ander_. ___00_. r
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with Change using Y, N or N1A)
y - Proposed change Is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
N_ Proposed change is In fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
Y - Change is being implemented In a manner consistent with the existing agreement
Y - The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
Y - Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth In the change are reasonable
DATION: this form 18 to be signed and dated.
Date: 4/12/05
Date:
1/1'1/1r
l~
Revised 12/23104
. .'
Agenda Item No. 16E4
May 10, 2~'
Page 46 of rl
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: Roadway Asaet inventory PROJECT #:
BlDlRFP t: 03-3501
PO ~ ...-031878
MOD .:
1
AMOUNT OF nIB CHANGE ,",411.00
Work Order-=
CONTRACT AMOUNT.: ORIGINAL $ as,835. 00 CURRENT $501,121.00
(STARTING POINT) ClIICLUDlIiIG Till CHAllGE ORDER)
Last ace Approved Amount G6,a&.00
CLAST TOTAL AIIT. REQlMlIiIG BCC APPROVAL)
DatIl of Last ace Apprcmll 04127104
Agenda Item. 1688
CUmuIlltlve DoIIItr v.... of Ct...... Orders to this Contl8ct1Work Order: $45.491.00
~..... of the ct.... overfunder current c:ontrKt amount ..1 %
Formula: (Current Amount I Last BCC approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% Bce approval is required; under 10% reported to ace on
Purchasing report. For specific infonnalion ragarding wortt order lI'Iresholds. please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.C.4. f11~ t, UJ1l"
CURRENT COMPlETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: 04112105 CURRENT: 80 da,ys frOm NTP -!r-
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (8): identify the ct.ngea. Clean and build a new roadwaY data laver
for all colriv roadwaYs used for linear referencina that is associatBd with coIIectina and maintaining road BSeets
as Dart of the Hansen Transoortation deoIoymenl The data wID be stored in GIS. This work was conducted
under Task Al linear ReferencinsJ System Creation of the exiBtina SCOD8 fA work for the original 330 miles of
roadwaY coIec.ted under the existinQ contract.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (8): What value or benefit do ..... ch.... provide to the project?
This wortt is critical in making full use of the Hansen SYStem. and would have been include in the orioinal SCODe
of work had we known the imitations and reauintments of Hansen. CurrentlY. we onlY have lhis data for the
oriaina' 330 miles that were inctuded in the oriainal scppe fA wort.
PARTES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Soace Imaama and their subconsultant. Data Transfer
Solutions. Internal communication has haDDened with the Transoortation Division. Dianna Perryman and Arw:Jv
Vaniscak.
IIFLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, Nor NlA)
_ Y _ Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
_ y _ Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
_ Y _ Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existi"tg agreement
_ Y _ The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
_ y _ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
PROJECT MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: This fonn is to be signed and dDKL
APPROVE BY: Bert Miller ~A Date: 4/12105
Project Manager
Revised 12/23/04
REVIEWED BY:
Con
Revised 12/23/04
-
Date:
t( /1,,/I/{'
Agenda Item No. 16E4
May 10, 2005
Page 47 of 57
Agenda Item"No. 16E4
May 10, 2005
Page 48 ofy~
,.-
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAIIE;J-lvlnaaton Road tlmmokalH to County Line) Land.ca_ ImDrOvemant
PROJECT #: fS0413
BIDIRFP t. 04-3655 MOD ~
..
AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE ........1J1t
~
PO #: 4600031631
Work Order #: NlA
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ my CURRENT $ 1.009.G10.87
CSTA NG NT) (INCLUDNJ THIS CHANGE ,ORDER)
lalit Bec Approved Amount $ 836.3426
(LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING acc APPROVAL)
Date of Last Bce Approval December 1... 2004
Agenda Item # 18B-16
Cumuldve Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContnlctlWorlc Order: $ t01.8II.87
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount-L"
Fonnula: (Current Amount I Last BOC approved' amQUnt)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BeC approval Is required; under 10% reported to Bee on
PUrchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.C.4.
CURRENT COMPlETION DATE (S):()RlGINAL: Februarv 7. 2001
CURRENT: ADrII8. 200S
SU....ARy OF PROPOSED .CHANGE (8): Ideatlfy the chang_. Deletion and addltton of bl8llt I1I'8terlala.
deletion of Irriaetlon station. addlUonal, dll'Htlonal bores and addlna till dirt to orolect. ' "
JUSTlFICAnON FOR CHANGE (8): What value or benefit do th.. changes provide to the project?..!hII
chan_ order Includes -123.828.82 for ~Iant deletion, and Irrlaatlon Itatlon deletion -1148.20. A total
amount In credit of -124.775.02. It adds Ul78.23 In additional Dlan" and additional Directional bo.... In
the amount of $20.172.60. It also adds the flllm dirt needed for the DrOIect In the amount of 183..170.00.
For a total of $88.318.83 In additions. Th....tore the total added amount to this DroIect I., IS3.U3.81.
PARnES CONTACTED REGARDING TH~ CHANGE: Bob ~.n. Diane Flaaa. Gloria Herrera. Scott
Windham and Dale Hannula
IMPLE.,ENTATION STEPS (Verify each before procettdlng with change using Y, N or N/A)
..::L Proposed change Is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
..::L. Proposed change Is in fact an liIddltion or deletion to the existing scope
..::L Change is being implemented In a manner consistent with the existing agreement
..::L The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
..::!- Proposed prices, fees and costa set forth In the change are reasonable
ATION: Th.. form Is' to be signed and dated.
Date: l' - ar--er-
Dele: ~
APPROVE BY:
Revised 12123/04
Agenda Item!, 1,6E4
M't 2005
Pa,E of 57
I
CONTRACTIlIODtFJCATlON
CHECKLIST FORM
project Name: Llvinaaton Road PI\a,. 1 & 2 (RadIo Road to PIne Ridae Road} ~ lJ:600714
BIDlRFP ':0.4-3651
POt:~2671
MOD~!
AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE: J!
Work (),*r'~ .MIA
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL S 188.182.44 ,CURRENT. $ 1~1.5'
(STARTtJIfG'PC*T) ~ THIS " CRDII!R)
u.t Bce APPfOVeclAmount $ 888_04
'flAST1'OTAL MIlT. 'RI!QUII!UNG 8CC ~
Date of ~ sec Approval ,fun, 8. 20M ",1tlIm II "....
Cumu~ Dollar Value. of Chan~ 0n:Iera to this CantraalWork OftJer.SSLI89.A7
percentage of the c;I1ange over/under c:umant c:otmtctamount
Formula: (C1.Irrent Nnourrtl Last Bee 8p~ Bmount)-1
Results and Ac:tione: tf the change exc:eeds 10Ci6 ace approval i8 requinad; under 1,0% reported to see on
Purchasir1g report. Forspec:ific Infermatioft I'8gafding wOrlt order tl.~, ... refer to tl'ttt ~d
Administration Procedu"", Section III.C.4
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: Janu8rv 24. 2001
CURRENT: IIaV 2. '2005
SUMIlIARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE, (8): Add.... daa to be able to iilDUt chaa_ order tt3 in tha
avaII8m and enoualt time to .lIawc:..... ~'. fIl) GO to.. BCC.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S~: Need I'IIOIa davs to be ... liD 1II'aC'" ....1'WeIti:
PARTIES, CONTACTED REGARDING THE CH.fMGE: Bob ............ DIMe A_a. . ~torIa .......... Dale
Hllnnufa .nd .ke lice... _ _
.PLEIIENTATJON STEPS (V.nty eKh before. proceeding ,with change U8int Y, N or RIA)
_ Y _ Proposed change is conaistent with the acope of the uisting IIQI'8emeEd
_ Y _ Proposed change is if:! fad an Ilddltion or <feI8tion 10_ uiatirIg scope
_ Y _ Change is being implemented In a manner conli8tent with the existing agreement
- Y - "Theapproprlate parties have been consulted f8P1'Cting the change
_ Y _ Proposed pri.ces,fees and costs set forth In the change ant lUSonable
PROJECT MANA
APPROVE BY:
Revised 9/14104,
.;,....!l.
.-........' . r
Agende,+tem No. 1~E4 .
, '.:.~~~a~e.~?Ofl5'
~'h:r:8l':.\' -, '.
2!t!!"'-:',":
-. ~.
'~'1-
:cr-.....-:onr-:. -
':"e":..-.:nt'l";' -
'IllI!/':''''!~:.\' -."
CONTRACT MODlFICA TION
. CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: Golden Gate Grade Separated Overpass PROJECT #: 60006
6~-3l,536~~o' . .
BID/RFP #: .-GIt'1 rU2. fl-MOD #: O.}lNTOF THIS CHANGE $-'2
\..
PO #:
Work Order #:
CURRENT$
35.397.385.35
.CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $
.
Last BCe Approved Amount $
(STAR11NG POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
NfA
(lAST TOT AI.. AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL)
Date 01 Last BCe Approval
N/A
Agenda Item # N/A
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractIWork Order: U- ~
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount N/A % ~g\'Of,
Formula.: (Current Amount I Last BCC appro'\(ed amount)-1 ~.T
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds' 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported 0 BCe on
Purchasing report. For specific information -regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contra'ct
Administration Procedures, Section 1lI.C.4 SA" -
. . Ocn'EI. ~/,~fJI&, t'A"~
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORlGINAL: September 24. 2006 CURRENT: ~eDtG" ,Dt::1 24. 2006
,===-==--=-=-::---~----- - = --....--.. ...........--....-. --'
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S5="Adjusflng pnce for'6O'"1=Iot'~pe ell:) ~6ackUjf~espOl'lE!e~
adjusting plan quantity to reflect addendum #2 and adding a une item for 50. RCP pipe to cross Golden Gat'
Parkway. .
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (5): Contract negotiations prior to award of contract (see attached) Added 5C
Rep pipe for road crossing. Corrected plan quantity to reflect' addendum #2.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Reviewed and approved bv Lvnn Thome. P.E
Principal Proiect Manaoer. T.E-C.M.
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N/A)
l Proposed change is consistent wIth the scope of the existing agreement '
l proposed change is in fact al'} addition or deletion to the existing scope
l Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
l The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the ,change '
-Y-Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
/
PROJEC~~N_AG:ECOMMENDATION:
APPRO\/, : ~k d-Lr- Date:
DISAPP E: Date:
COMMENTS: ~ ~
fevised9/14/04 .,,~ ~/!< - - -
!J.tc(~~
1//1/(5
Agenda Item No. 1~-/
May 10, 2 i)-
Page 51 of 7
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: Gin a GNde Se
BIDlRFP ,: 04~.i~ '~OD .:.../JJ .I/IF 5
PO,:
Work Order #:
PROJECT #: 80006
Ut!TOF THIS CHANGE $~
~..\.'
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $
CURRENT$
36.397.381.35
(STARTING POINT) ~CLUDlNO 11U CHANGE ORDER)
Lnt BCC Approved Amount $ N1A
(LAST TOTAL AIIT. REQUIRING sce APPROVAL)
Date of Laat Bee Approval
N1A
Agenda Item # N1A
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractlWork Order: 12-
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount NlA % 1-1.$
Fonnula: (Current Amount I Last Bee approved amount)-1 ~.
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BeC approval. required; under 10% reported to BCC on. l...
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the C~'O
Administration Procedures, Section III.C.4 ~~,. (
IJtTIMK At 1Nr' 'IS
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORlGINAL: SeDtember 24. 2006 CURRENT: i.aMDrr ~..4. 2
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Deleting sea' concrete! adding Contractors alterative method. To
accommodate these changes monies were taken from~ ~ .~Il) J . i I ll. .. .ill AllowanC8llt. fI:-
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): to faciutate construction of the box culvert and .s. walls.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Reviewed and IIDDI'OV8d bv Lvnn ThOl"D8. P.E..
PrinclDal Prolect Manaaer. T.E.C.M. . and Euaene Calvert. P.E.. I~t~ D~r. T.E~C.M..
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify .ach before proceeding with ch.nge using Y. Nor N1A)
.::L Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
.::L Proposed change Is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
L Change Is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
..:t.... The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
-Y-Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
PROJE~.MANA : R5"MENDATlON:
APPRO. _~.~
DISAP :
Date: ~{IDM
Date:
COMMENTS:
.4PAl'bVC: ~ ~ lJ~.' .y/~,,/~
I/II'T R/It!:f3 815t!/4 '-1ST
Revised 9/14/04
"
., .
Agenda Item No. 16EL
May 10, tOO
Page 52 rf 5
--
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: Napl.. Jail Center PROJECT #: 52008
BlDJRFP #: 88-2867"'i;jMOD #: ...LAMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $10,000.00
PO t: 4500023475 ~ork Order
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 845,418.00 CURRENT $884,818.00
{lTARnNG POINT) (INCLUDINCJ nu CHANGE ORDER)
Last BeC Approved Amount $845,419.00
(LAST TOTAL AIIT. ReQUIRING BeC APPROVAL)
~~u&.~~~~-.~~..~~':;':~.~~.o.._t,....
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount 2.31
Formula: (Current Amount I Last Bce approved amount)-1
Results ~nd Actions: If.the chan~e ex~eds...~,O% B~ ap.proval iS~Ulredi under 1~~ ~ to Bee ,on
Purchasl g renort. ,"'"JJ~.JII'lII 1.Wll."'.4.b1lW.".. "J'..U*1D_.~.l_
.Q"I' r J1l prMbf"lfe' ',".
.,' .... ' '" L '.. ,
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORlGINAL: 112008
CURRENT:112006
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (8): Additional Sentices to Drovlcle test and balance services for the
Collier County Central Enerav Plant ExDansion.
, JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (8): Owner Requested, required for proper operation of the chili.... for
the Jail expansion.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Jack Crognale.
IMPLEMENTATiON STEPS (Verify .ach beto,. proceeding with change using Y, N or N1A)
_ Y _ Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
...y_ Proposed change Is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
_ Y _ Change is being Implemented In a manner consistent with the existing agreement
-'1_ The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
...y_ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth In the change are reasonable
Date: ?-/l'P~.r'
Date:
COMMENTS:
ffrY
Revised 9/14/04
Agenda '~~)f.,1g~~
P ,e ,3 of 57
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHI!CKLI8T FORM
PROJECT NAME: ,.,.... JIIII PROJECT #: 52008
.DMFP I; .,~ MOD t: 33 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANG! 128,7'"
PO I: 4S00012301
Work Order*:
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL, 34,402,171.00 CURRENT __800.31
..-M'IINCt POINT) CINCI UDINlI 'nil CIIMCIII ORDIR)
..... 8CC Approved Amount 21,814,372.1.
(LAIT n:rrAL MIr. -oI!lftllGecc AI'tIROVM.)
om of LMt BCC Approval 21101M AGenda ...... # 1o-B
Cumu.... Doll. VIII.. 01 C...... 0rcIera to..1e eo..b..Al"i'Von Order: 1(4,4eI.271.1Z)
........... of the chmIge CMI1under current contract MIOUnt -1.27%
FornUa: (ewr.nt Amount I Last BCC 8PPI"OV8d amount)-1
~ and ActIon.: Ifth. change .xceedI10% Bce IPProval II rwquJred; &I1der10% reported to Bee on
Purchufng F8port. For lpecIftc Informatfon regarding work order threehoJdt. pleae refer to the Contract
AdmInistratIon Procedur., Section III.C.4.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: 8/13108 CURRENT: 8/13/01
auMIIMY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (8): IdenIIfy the changee. TheN... 2S PCR'a (Prop~"d CMnge
~ Included In .. change order. ".. 21 ...... .... to be ......... from the COnl....ncr
when thIa Ia ~ thla will kMp the project from having a negatIw COIIIII....ICY.
~n.: FOR CHANGE ':....w:=~ or bHd do..... ~ DI'CIVIcM to the DI'CHet7
n.. ClartldoM naI want . ........ ~
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THe CHANGE: Jack CmanalA. Peter ~
IMPLIIIENTAnON ITlN (Vertfy-=h befcn proeeedIngwllh ~ uaIng Y, N or NlA)
- Y - Propoeed change II conaIat8nt with the scope d the exIItIng agreement
- y - Propoeed change lain filet an addltfon or deletion to the exiatIng scope
- y - Chenge Is being Implemented In . manner CDn8l1t8nt with the existing IIgrMment
- Y - The appropriate pMIea haw been consulted regan:llng the change
_Y- Propoeed prtcea. feea and con 88t,forth In the change.... reasonable
RI! MENDATION: Thle form .. to be algned and dIItecL
o.te: -r;b/fj! AI
Dok 14f/~
REVI
Roviaed 12123J04
:r ..-
,
Agen{im No. 16E4
ay 10, 2005
age 54 of 57
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKL.IST FORM
PROJECT NAME: NORTH NAPLES REGIONAL PARK PROJECT #: 80602
BIDIRFP #: 01-3189 MOD #: 8 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE (-$1,609,324.99)
PO #: 4500037217
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $53,802,645 CURRENT $44,088,215.09
(STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
last BCC Approved Amount $48,156,587.86
(LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUlRING BCC APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval: 21812005
Agenda Item # 16(0)3
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this Contract: $-9,714,429.91
Percentage of the changeover/under current contract amount:. -8.45%
Formula: (Current Amount I Last BCC approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC.on
Purchasing report. For specific Information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.CA.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: 5110/2006 CURRENT: 5/1012006
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Identify the changes. This deductive change order #8 Is
associated with the Direct Materials Purchase of' materials directly from the project vendors of the
North Naples Regional Park construction project. By deducting the direct costs of certain materials
form Kraft Construction's purchase order and purchasing directly form the vendor, the County Is able
to save the 6% Florida Sales Tax on the purchases. In this case, the savings on the $1,609,324.99 of
purchases equals approximately $91,000 In tax savings to the County. Collectively all change orders
add up to $9,714,429.91 which equates to an approximate tax savings of '$ 582,800 to the County.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the project?
Exhibit 0 of the Contract sets out the procedure for executing the Direct Material Purchase of
goods. This Change Order Is consistent with the contract's procedure and Is in concert with the
County's policy of Sales Tax savings thru direct purchase. this saves the County significant amounts
of money.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Parks and Recreation Director, Public Services
Administrator, Purchasing Contract'. Specialist, Clerks Finance Department Special Pr~Jects
Coordinator
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, Nor N1A)
Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing. agreement
Y The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
Y Proposed prices. fees and costs set forth In the change are reasonable .
PROJECT MAN ATlON: This form is to be si n a d dated.
APPROVED B . Date:
P
REVIEWED BY: Date:
Con
Revised 12123/04
Agenda Item No. 161n
May 10, 20
Page 55 of 7
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: NORTH NAPLES REGIONAL PARK PROJECT #: 80602
BIDIRFP #: 01-3189 MOD #: 9 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE (-$670,980.00)
PO #: 4500037217
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $53,802,645 CURRENT $43,417,235.09
(STARllNG POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
Last BCC Approved Amount $48,156,587.86
(LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval: 2/812005
Agenda Item # 16(0)3
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this Contract: $-10,385,409.91
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount: -9.85% .
Formula: (Current Amount I Last BCC approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.CA.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORIGINAL: 5/1012006 CURRENT: 5/10/2006
SUMMARV OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Identify the changes. This deductive change order -II Is
associated with the Direct Materials Purchase of materials directly from the project vendors of th(
North Naples Regional Park construction project. By deducting the direct costs of certain materials
form Kraft Construction's purchase order and purchasing directly form the vendor, the County Is able
to save the 6% Florida Sales Tax on the purchases. In this case, the savings on the $670,980.00 of
purchases equals approximately $37,900 In tax savings to the County. Collectively all change orders
add up to $1 0,385,409~91 which equates to an approximate tax savings of $ 623,000 to the County.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the project?
Exhibit 0 of the Contract sets out the procedure for executing the Direct Material Purchase of
goods. This Change Order is consistent with the contract's procedure and is in concert with the
County's policy of Sales Tax savings thru direct purchase. This saves the County significant amounts
of money.
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Parks and Recreation Director, Public Services
Administrator, Purchasing Contract's Specialist, Clerks Finance Department Speciel Projects
Coordinator
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using V, Nor NlA)
Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
Y The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
Y Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
PROJECT MAN E AnON: This form is to be ~$ ~
APPROVED BY: Date:
Pr . <' I
~~~~ ~: I,
Contr Ct
Revised 12123/04
Agenda Item No. 1~4
May~
PageGtt 0 7
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: Santa Barbara Force Main
PROJECT#: 73132
BID/RFP #: 03-3534
MOD #: 1
AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $ 120.069.80
. PO #: 4500016141 Work Order#:
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 6.479.573.99 CURRENT $ 6.599.643.79
{STARTING POINT) {INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
Last BCC Approved Amount $ 6.479.573.99
{LAST TOTAL MT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL)
Date of lastBCC Approval 9/23/2003
Agenda Item # 10 C
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractIWork Order: $ 120.069.80
,0'1 ~
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount~% I ,~~ (r
Formula: (Current Amount / last BCC approved amount)-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer to the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section III.C.4.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S):ORlGINAL: 4/2612005 CURRENT: 6/10/2005
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (5): Identify the changes. Field modifications were necessarv to
address unforeseen underaround conditions.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the project? The
Droiect COU1des;:>mDleted without these modifications
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Bill Mullin: Marc lean (Enaineer of Record for
Greelev and Hansen)
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using V, N or N/A)
..:L Proposed Change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
..:L Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
..:L Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the e,xisting agreement
..:L The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
..:L Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
: This form Is to be signed and dated.
Date: 4/14/2005
REVIEWED BY: '
Contra
Date: 'f d. ;z.jbr
Revised 12/23/04
Agenda Ite~AEA
MaY~,~5
Page 57 of 57
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT NAME: Vanderbilt Beach Road, CR 862
BID/RFP #: 04-3675 MOD #: N/A
PROJECT #: 63051
AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $ 0.0
PO #: 4500031427
Work Order #: 01
CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 37,604,879.73 CURRENT $37,604,879.73
(STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER)
Last Bee Approved Amount $ 37.604.879.73
(lAST TOTAL AMY. REQUIRING Bce APPROVAL)
Date of Last BCC Approval 7- 27-~O~~
Agenda Item # N/A
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractlWork Order: $ 0
Percentage of the change over/under current contract amount 0 %
Formula: (Current Amount I Last BCC approved amount}-1
Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on
Purchasing report. For specific information regarding work order thresholds, please refer tQ the Contract
Administration Procedures, Section IiI.C.4.
CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: November 24, 2007 CURRENT: November 24, 2001
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Identify the changes. Ronald Dillard .from the Collier County
Water Dej)artment requested a rej)reSentative from PriCe Brothers to be present any time the contractor is cutting
into the existing concrete pressure pjDe (PCCP)'
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): What value or benefit do these changes provide to the project?
Collier Countv Water Deoartment feels this is a safe guard. due to the Contractor not having the experience
with the concrete oressure oipe (PCep). .
PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Eddie Martin. Project Manger. Collier County
Transoortation Engineering & Construction Management Deoartment:
Ronald Dillard. P.E.. Senior Protect Manager CoWer County Public Utilities Engineerina Deoartment
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N/A)
..::L Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement
l Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope
..::L Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement
l The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change
l Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable
REVIEWED BY:
APPROVE BY:
Revised 12/23/04
Agenda I tem No. 16F 1
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommend Approval to Change Order No. 1 to Contract # 05-3753 with
Snyder Industries, Inc. for Maintenance Dredging of Wiggins Pass Project
#905221
OBJECTIVE: To change Contract 05-3753 for the Maintenance Dredging of Wiggins Pass by
adding time and an additional quantity of sand to be dredged in order to complete the project.
CONSIDERATIONS: On October 26, 2004, the Board approved a $750,000 grant application
to dredge Wiggins Pass, limiting the depth to 8.5 feet for the first 300 feet and then transitioning
to 13 feet. Invitations to bid were sent out on November 1, 2004 and bids were received on
November 30, 2004. On December 14, 2004, the Board approved award ofa contract to the low
bidder, Snyder Industries, in the amount of $380,000 based on the following unit costs and
estimates:
...--'
Mobilization
45,000 cubic yards @ $6
Turbidity Monitoring
Construction Subtotal
Additional 23,512 cy @ $6
Construction Total
$100,000
$270,000
$10,000
$380,000
$141,072
$521,072
The pre-construction survey indicated 68,512 cubic yards are available to be dredged, an
increase of23,512 cubic yards over the estimated 45,000 cubic yards in the bid document. The
increase of23,512 cubic yards represents the maximum yardage that can be dredged from this
area. This increase is the result of sand accretion between the survey dates and also an allowance
for over-dredging the area. Over-dredging is common and can result from rough seas and the
imprecise cutter head operation. It is highly improbable that this project will dredge the entire
68,512 cubic yards however, at $6 per cubic yard, this equates to an additional $141,072. The
revised project estimate is as follows:
Revised Construction
Engineering services, etc.
Construction Monitoring
Project Total
$521,072
$60,000
$45,000
$626,072
Construction was scheduled to begin on 1/17/05. Mobilization did occur on that date, but
production did not begin until 2/8/05 due to equipment problems and weather, which hampered
progress. A construction permit extension has been granted by FDEP to allow this work to be
completed, and this change order extends the contract time by 33 days so that the additional
23,512 cubic yards can be dredged in order to complete the project by May 31, 2005.
COUNTY ATTORNEY FINDING: A finding by the County Attorney is not required for this
/""" item.
Agenda Item No. 16F1
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 7
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS:
Coastal Advisory Committee: Recommended approval on February 10,2005.
Tourist Development Council: Recommended approval on February 28, 2005
Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee: NI A
FISCAL IMP ACT: The Source of funds is from Category "A" Tourist Development Tax fund
195-110406 Project 905221.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan
related to this action.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve Change Order No.
1 to Contract # 05-3753 with Snyder Industries, Inc. for Maintenance Dredging of Wiggins Pass
Project #90522 I
PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Projects Manager, Tourism Department
~...j-'
,_.,
Agenda Item No. 16F1
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 7
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Meeting Date
16F1
Recommendation to approve Change Order No, 1 to Contract # 05-3753 with Snyder
Industries, Inc, for Maintenance Dredging of Wiggins Pass in the amount of $141,072,
5/10/2005 9:00:00 AM
Item Number
Item Summary
Prepared By
Date
Gary McAlpin
Costal Project Manager
312412005 1 :56:16 PM
County Manager's OffIce
Tourism
Approved By
Lyn Wood
Purchasing Agent
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
3/24/2005 2:07 PM
Approved By
Jack Wert
Tourism Director
Date
County Manager'a Office
Tourism
3/2412005 2:26 PM
Approved By
Gary McAlpin
Costal Project Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
Tourism
3/24120054:26 PM
Approved By
Linda Jackson
Contracts Agent
Date
Administrative Services
Purchaelng
4127/20053:09 PM
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General Sves Director
Date
Admlnistretive Services
Purchasing
4128/2005 12:55 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Anlstant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4128/20054:13 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
512/2005 12:08 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowskl
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
512/200512:18 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's OffIce
5121200512:32 PM
Ag~
Date:
03/23105
To Steve:
E-Mailed To Bonnie:
,/
03-Lr-O;
Project Name: Maintenance Dredging of Wiggins Pass
Project Number: 905221
BIDIRFP #:
05-3753
Modi:
1
POi;
4500040665
Work Order Number:
Conlractor/Consultant: Snyder Industries. Inc.
Original Contract Amount: $_380,000.00
(Starting Point)
C1.IITent Conttact Amount $_380,000.00
(All changes prior to this modification)
"
Last BCe Approved Amount $_380.000.00
(Last Total Amount Requiring BCC Approval)
Amount of This Change: $_141.072.00
Revised Contract Amount: $_521.072.00
(Including this Change Order)
Cumulative Dollar Value of Change Orders to this ContractIW ork Order: $_141,072.00
Percentage IncreaselDecrease:
37.12%
Overview of change: To adjust quantity of sand to be dredged from survey done prior to design to pre-construction
survey which increased quantity of sand to be dredged, with accompanying time extension for contractor to dredge
additional sand.. ,j
Ceotmot SpedaIiot ~ fn '(;) IH Date: .3 -023 -0;('
Steve's Acknowledgemen . 9-" Date: '3 ... L3 - O:S:
03 -:;).4 - r; 5
Scanned Date:
Data Entry Information:
Type of Change: Contract
Project Manager: Gary McAlpin
Department: Tourism
Scanned copies of tM back up documentation mo.y be located on the Purchasing G drive:
G:ICurrent-Changes to Contracts
G:I Current - Changes to Work Orders
M 23 2005 ~'09PM collier tourism
i.f,. J.
No 5667 P. '/6
Agenda Item t-fo. 16F1
May 10. 2005
Page 5 of?
-
CONTRACT MODIFICATION
CHECICUIT PORII
PROJECT NAME: ........ Dredging of WIllI" p- PROJICT f:.IIIIl1
IIDIRFP I: Coatract #105oo3'53 MOD': 1.:.,AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE "41,0T2.0D
PO .: 4IQOO.4OIII
CONTRACT AMOUNT: 0RlGJNAL' -'000 .. CURRENT' "1P72
_ _~.,... POINTI .,.....,..... aNMaII ~
LIlt 8CC ApprtMld Amount.. ..,oao ,
tLMTTOTALAIIT._1GC ~ALl
DatI of LalIt 8CC AppfOVII: Deoam_14 .. Agenda Itm: . 1 IF'
CuIIIUIaIIve DoIIIrVaIuI 01 Chlnge 0rr.IIn to thII ~ 0nIIr: 11",072.00
,.,.,... "the ...... over#UnCIIt ourrent UVljbMt amount -1'1.1.
Formula: (CUmtnt Amount ILaIt Bee IPPI'OYId amount}1
RH. aI AaIIonI: "the cNnOI--' 1~ see IPprovaIlI naqulred; under 10" reported to Bee on
PurchIIInQ,.pon. For tp8Clftc InIorInIIIIon NQll'dlno WOfk ener I1N1ho1d1. .... ..... to the ContrIQ
Ada......dk>>n ~ SIttIon III.C.4.
CUMINT COMPLITION DATI (8):ORICJINAL: 101 d.,.... ...... of NTP. CURRINT: 131 .,.
_ .............. of NTP. .
I11MMA1lY 0' PRO'PODD CHANGB (8): To .... 2S,5U wille ,... or ..... to .. dnd" rre.
w...... ... aDd ..... tile fia. for .....tIaI.... ..... co...... by >> ..,. .. ..... to cem.... die
IIIcIttIaaI ............
JUlfFICATION POR CHANGE (I): What: value or blIMIIt dO .,.. ohaRIH, prov" to the project:
RIIquIntd . . oondItIon f/I perml""".
DI..... ...., .. 11II11II I....... ,tD ... lie .....oonatNOtIOft tuVIIJ vi ..... .... .....n.
Immedllltlly prior to oOnIIIruaIon. ",. original quenItV ... baled on an............. IUIWY
oonduotld prtor tD ......, pernllIIng, bidding, mablUlallan and oonatruotIon.
PAR11EI CONTACTED Rl!GMDING THI! CHANGI: Lvn Wood, Cu.,__ .......
IIIPLI!IIENTA1'ION I. W ~.. Wore proll........ ...... ...... V, N or MfA)
Y II Propoa. dwIge II canalltent with the acope rI the e1dItIng agrwment
y. PI'OPOIId GhInge lain fIct an lddIUon or ~ to ....-ung ape
Y. Ch....1I being ~ In . ........ ClOI1IIIt8nt wtth the __ .......,...m
Y . The IIPPI'OPri* PM'- have been ..... nagercIInQ the ~
y. P\~ pdca. ..... and aoatalet foIt1ln the ahwIge .. N1110ft11b1e
PROJECT MANAGER FU!COMIIENDATlON: thill form .. to be .... and ellted.
APPROVE BY: 0*: J /'I4/0(
~./
DatIl: /!J tJ"3 -6
1leviIICl12123/04
TO:
Snyder Industries, Inc.
2821 NE 52- Court
Lighthouse Point, FL 33064
CHANGE ORDER ##1 TO CONTRACf ## 05-3753
FROM:
Tourian Depa.. twent
3050 North Horsesboc Drive, Suite 218
Naples, FL 34104
Agenda Item No. 16F1
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 7
Project Name: Maintenance Dredging of
Wiggins Pass Project No. 905221
Contract Approved: 12/14/04
Change Order No.: 1
Change Order DeleriptioD: lDerease quatities to be dredged to reflect the pre-
eollltruetion llU'Vey. Quantities wiD iaerase to . man-UBI of 68,512 albic yards from
45,000 cubic yards. Contract value wiD baerease to 5521,072 ad require 135 days to
eomplete from original Dotiee to proeeed.
Original agreeJDent BIDOunt ............................................................ $380,000
This Change Order No.1 Amount (add) $141,072
Revised AgreeJnent Amount ........................................................... $521,072
Original contract tUne in calendar days... ..... ............. ........ ....... ......... .......102 days
Adjusted number of calendar days due to previous change orders........... .......... 0 days
This change order adjusted tUne is.................. ......... ........................... .... 33 days
llnism CoIII1YId TIme ill working tIJJys. .. . .. .. .. . .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. .... .. . ... .. . . . ...... .. 135 days
Original Notice to Proceed date................................................... ....... ....1/13/05
Completion date based on original contract time was 102 calendar days from 1/13/105 or
4/26/05.
Revised completion date due to change order(s) will not exceed the 135 days as outlined in
the original work and this change order. The anticipated completion is May 31, 2005.
Your acceptaDce of this change order shall constitute a modification to our Agreement and
will be perfonned subject to an the same terms and conditions as comamen in said Agreement
indicated above, as fully as if the same were repeated in this acceptance. The adjustment, to
this Agreement shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims arising out of,
or related to, the change set forth herein, including claims fur impact and delay costs.
~~
Pr~med~: &
y Me in, Senio Project Manager
To. pepartment
Accepted by: ~ R ~
Kurt R. Dionne, President
Snyder Industries, Inc.
Approved by: ~ ~/~----
Jack , Director "
Tourism Department
Date: 'f - Z. 7. -(J S
Date:
I.f - .J..~ . CI S-
Date: r -.:>5'-'-OJ'
3:10PM colI ier tourism
No, 5667 P. 6/6
Agenda Item No. 16F1
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 7
MIroh 23, 2005
!Ja "_11I11. fM-782~MA
btLo--.~
SaycIer IDduItriII, IDD.
2821 NI J2IlI Ct.
t~Potat. PI. 33064
0: ean-tlaa. ofCaldraat Duratkm
~.DndJinI of'Wtgiu Pal
Prciect No. 90522. CaaInat No. 0>3753
Punbue Order No. 4500040665
Dc Mr. Dkmne:
'l1dI1IUw .wi U . IeVllm to Cow. eouat)". oftloJal NemeR TO _nr.IlRn
(N'l'P) ..... to your firm OR 111111111113. 200$.
P1Iue DClIlIt that tbI oarnDt ountraot dmt far aubItUItiaI oomplldoa punuaat w
AddllldulP 11 to Bid 05-3753 II 95 .,. ntbIr tblDdlo 65.... cIIyI~ In
1121 NTP"'''''''' 13. 2005. Tho 11na1 compIcdcIl date II 102 OIlIPdaP dayI hID
NTP.
All otlwr WIllI_ aonditiODl oftbt ll111WY 13, 1005 NTi' nmaID in ftaR ftno aDd
..
....... 0111_ at 530.5342 if you haw aD)' q\IIItlcma.
S......
J.L~ep~
CaIIta1 PIqf.U w..pr
cc: BcIIDII Bur. CIIrk', Taare
LyD Wa04. CcanatI 1peaillilt
- . - . .. - . . - ..... - -. - . - ... - -....
Agenda Item No 16F2
May 10,2005
Page 1 of 5
EXECUTrvESU~Y
Recommend approval of Change Order #1 for a 545,000 increase to Contract ##01-3271 to
Work Order #HM-Ff-OS-03 to Humiston & Moore for additional construction monitoring
services for the Wiggins Pass dredging project 905221.
OBJECTIVE: Recommend Approval of an additional $45,000 in Time and Material funds to
allow Humiston & Moore to continue to provid;- const'Uction monitoring and obServa1.1or: for the
Wiggins Pass mainten:mc:e dredging projec:
CONSIDERATIONS: Tnis Change Order will provide sufilcient Time and. Material funds to
continue the construction observations by Humiston and Moore for the months of April and May
2005. These monies ftmd additional construction monitoring required by an estimated increase
of23,512 cubic yards of dredge material as well as equipment and weather delays. Snyder
Industries, the dredging contractor is however, performing within their schedule as outlined in
the current contract documents.
The original construction-monitoring budget was based on a 30-day period, which would have
been adequate under ideal conditions and the dredge quantities not changing. Mobilization of
this contractor occurred on Janumy 17,2005. Construction activities will be complete and
demobilization will occur during the first week of May 2005.
.-
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS:
Coastal Advisory Committee: Recommended approval on April 14, 2005.
Tourist Development Council: Recommended approval on April 25, 2005.
Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee: N/ A
FISCAL IMPACT: The Source offtmds is from Category "A" Tourist Development Tax fund
195-ll040~905221
GROWm MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan
related to this action.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners Recommend Approval of
Change Order #1 to Work Order #HM-Ff-05-03 for $45,000 to allow Humiston and Moore to
provide additional construction monitoring to the maintenance dredging at Wiggins Pass.
PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin. P.E.. Coastal Proiects ManaHr. Tourism Deoartment
,-
Agenda Item No, 16F2
May 10,2005
Page 2 of 5
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16F2
Meeting Date
Recommend approval of Change Order #1 for a $45,000 increase to Contract #01-3271 to
Work Order #HM-FT -05-03 to Humiston & Moore for additional construction monitoring
services for the Wiggins Pass dredging project 905221,
5/10/200590000 AM
Prepared By
Date
Gar:,,' McAlpin
Costal Project Manager
4128120053:38:51 PM
"5 Of'
'T ounsrn
Appro\'cd B:
.Jack V~h~rt
Tourism Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Tourism
4128/2005 3:57 PM
Approyed By
Linda Jackson
Contracts Agent
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/28/20054:23 PM
Approved By
Gary McAlpin
Costal Project Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
Tourism
4/2812005 5:04 PM
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General Svcs Director
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/2912005 9:05 AM
Approyed By
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 2:27 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
514120052:34 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
5/412005 5:07 PM
---
TO:
Ken Humiston
Humiston & Moore
5679 Strand Court
Naples. FL 34110
CHANGE ORDER'I TO WORKORDER 1# HM-F'f -05-03
FROM:
Gary McAlpin
Tourism Oepartmem
3050 N. Horseshoe Drive, Suite 218
Napl~ FL 34104
Agenda Item No. 16F2
May 10. 2005
Page 3 of 5
Project Name: Wiggins Pass Maintenance
Dredging
Project No. 905221
Work Order Dated: December 16, 2004 WorL: Order No. HM-IT -CS-03
Ch~ng~ (~~rder No.: 1 Date: 4/2~.!::
Cnange Onj;~:r Description lncreased ~)nstru;;:iOll manitorID.f IS requrre.: w. a
result of ~ dredging quantities; weather and equipment related dredging delays.
Construction monitoring will continue until construction activities are completed currently
estimated during the first week in May 2005.
Original agreement amount ......................... ....................................$44, 148.00
This Change Order No. I Amount (add or subtract) .......................$45.000.00 T&E
Revisi!!d ~ AIIIOIlIII_....__.........._._........................._...... SI9,I48.00
Original contract time in calendar days ............ . . . . . . . . . . _ . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. .. . .30 days
Adjusted number of calendar days due to previous change orders ...... ... ... ... . .. . ..0 days
This change order adjusted time is... '" ... '" ...... ...... ... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ...........60 days
Revised Cont1flCt Tune in working days... ........................... ................. ..90 days
Original Notice to Proceed date ................................................ December, 16.2004
Completion date based on original contract time........................ February 15,2005
Revised completion date due to change order(s)........................ May 7, 2005
Your acceptance of this change order shall constitute a modification to our Agreement and will be
performed subject to all the same terms and conditions as contained in said Agreement indicated
above, as fully as if the same were repeated in this acceptance. The adjustment, to this Agreement
shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims arising out of. or related to, the
change set forth herein, including claims for impact and delay costs.
Prepared by: ~~M~
M pin, S or PrOject Manager
Tourism Department
Accepted by: ~ ~ L ~/~
Ken Humiston, P .E. . President
Humiston & Moore Engineers
Date:
'I/~/8S
.
Date: if~/65-
Approved by:
Jack Wert, Director
Tourism Department
Date:
Revised '1124/05
.
~!JMCDUIIRK o..~_ IM__
II r1 ~ .. .o.a.
Agenda Item No. 16F2
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 5
IIIl1. _~".
ea,", r ~ Tr
.& Jla "'~"~1
18''-~.. To-r
.'uu r~aL~::
c:..:..tax: ~.... ~_ 1.
!
e......tc..r.aJo. -.t
~- " ~~~ "'fte.EC1W: ......J
POt:.- -.n ~ --.<- 1 _.... ". __
=:
(LIlt T_""-tIilI. ~ by_ BO:::)
M4.1..
~ABa.p.I'har'fo TIlil'*,-*w ~f
. It ..1. 1u J'
.-.,
..me UI ,.,...........~:
~lIliIc-..Qder)
.f: A 1" ...........,0.- 11 ....Cr.. ..MWtft0llWlr:.......
1
~
.-......'
....
.
~jD!.l :;~.i"". . ~..;OIJ'I '--JIr ............ .._......
~ A.L....;JD.~H..It8CC.....~......1
A A"" - It~ 1"1>> tIb......-dI 1ow. ace ~ II ___dl _I. .....,. ....... till -= an
~ I.~""" For ~ Ub.WL.I ~..o wadt GIdIr b' ll'fInrik............ to.. ea.....
AIlaA.h1 ._ I PW U IIA~ 8IIDIIR &C.4.
~.
~."';~;=~i_'
.1. ~ ........_ .a.~""'''''''pr.III'''''CLl1n.I''''''Y.N_WA)
%~J..""'_ I1fUl.........ar.. .JI".~
I PRlp..........- _"It I ot'.dlllkl to.. --SO...
~ a-......I1.Un U.""" II _11I_ CD Jftb.All_.. ....~... J. tli611
Xn.I'J ~1t1''''''''~.'.J.......tt J......_.....
~....DI'.....CIIIIa_.........._.111 C'. M*
. :,,: . _.IlK..."l'~_-.nDN:"""''''''''.......... .......
APfIROW: 8V: : .' . . 0.: . ".
'EWf!l.. ,flY: . QJIIK 1/~.{
HUMISTON
& MOORE
ENGINEERS
Agenda Item No. 16F2
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 5
COASTAL
ENGINEERING DESIGN
AND PERMITTING
5679 STRAND COURT
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110
FAX:239 594 2025
PHONE, 239 594 2021
Marcn 14,2005
Mi". Gary rk:;L.,I:>ir-
C;olliec :,.,ounty PUDiic Uliiities :::.nglnesrmg ::Jep3:1ment
3301 East Tamiami Trail, Building H
Naples, FL 34112
Re: Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging Proposal, H&M File No. 12063
Dear Gary:
This is a revised request for a budget amendment to cover construction phase
services. This request supersedes the previous budget amendment request
dated March 1, 2005. This budget amendment is necessary due to construction
delays which have already occurred, applying for regulatory approval for an
extension to the construction window, and to allow for sufficient funds for
construction observations through April and May, plus additional meetings,
should there be additional delays in completing the dredging.
Our original budget was based on a 30 day construction period. The contractor
began mobilization on January 17, 57 days ago. At this point, it is estimated that
the dredging in the neighborhood of 20% complete. We therefore request that an
additional $45,000 be budgeted to cover time and materials for construction
phase services.
Sincerely yours,
HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS
// ,/ . /'
I\~ #~~
Kenneth K. Humiston, P.E.
Agenda Item No. 16F3
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve Amendment to 2004/2005 Tourism Agreement
Between Collier County and Paradise Advertising Agency, Inc. Regarding
EmergencylDisaster Relief Advertising Plan for $450,000 to be used for
Emergency Advertising and Promotion
Q?JECTI\"L. .' IX'Y' IJ. "jditlor,. : ndlL ;{)J' criticall~ ;i~~oed 200::: 0; -"eason ad\er,bin~
CONSIDERA:CIONS: At the April 25. 2005 Boarc of Coumy C\mnmsioners meeting the
Board reviewed several alternatives for additional funding of otT-season advertising due to the
loss of group business from the four 2004 hurricanes and misinformation on the condition of
Collier County to receive leisure guests. The Board found this to be an emergency situation and
approved the used of $500.000 from the tourist development tax emergency advertising funds
(Fund 196) for off-season advertising in 2005.
The contract amendment is being prepared at this report date and could not be entered into the
Novus system. A copy will be provided to the Board of County Commissioners under separate
cover prior to the May 10, 2005 Board of County Commissioners meeting.
_" FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in Tourist Development Tax Fund 196.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan
related to this action.
RECOMMENDATION: To approve an amendment to the 2004/2005 Tourism Agreement
between Collier County and Paradise Advertising, Inc. regarding an Emergency/Disaster Relief
Advertising Plan for up to $450,000 to be used for Emergency Marketing and Promotion for off-
season 2005 advertising and related production. The balance of the approved $500,000 will be
used for additional Public Relations and promotion, which will be handled by the Tourism
Department staff and additional research to measure the impact of the additional advertising with
Klages Research.
PREPARED BY: Gail Hambright, Administrative Assistant, County Tourism Department
.".....
Agenda Item No. 16F3
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16F3
Meeting Date
Recommendation to approve Amendment to 2004/2005 Tourism Agreement Between
Collier County and Paradise Advertising Agency, Inc. Regardmg EmergencyIDisaster
Relief Advertising Plan for 5450,000 to be used for Emergency Advertising and Promotion
5/10/2005 900:00 AM
Approved By
jack Wert
Tourism Director
Date
Appro\<:u H:,
OMS C.oordinator
Adrninistrd\;V(: AS5.istan.
Datt'
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/20057:54 AM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/4/200510:01 AM
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General Svcs Director
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
5/4/2005 11 :01 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/4/2005 2:35 PM
Approved By
James V, Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
5/4/2005 5:01 PM
~lbr::
5/ lo [c
FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2004/2005 TOURISM AGREEMENT REGARDING
EMERGENCY/DISASTER RELIEF ADVERTISING PLAN
This First Amendment to' 2004/2005 Tourism Agreement, made this _ day of
, 2005, (hereinafter. referred to as "First Amendment") is entered into by and
between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (heremafter referred to as
"COUNTY"), and Paradise Advertising, Inc., a Florida corporation (hereinafter referred to as
"PARADISE").
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, the COUNTY and PARADISE entered into a 2004/2005 Tourism Agreement
dated May 25,2004 (the "Agreement") for an Emergency Disaster Relief Plan up to 5300,000; and
WHEREAS, the Board finds the low number of scheduled hotel/motel reservations through
the summer to be an emergency situation; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY desires to fund a summer advertising campaign up to $450,000.
NOW, THEREFORE. in consideration of valuable consideration and the premises and
mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:
I. Section ] of said Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following paragraph is
inserted in its place:
SCOPE OF WORK. After issuance of a letter or notice to proceed in ful] or in part and in
accordance with the Budget attached as Exhibit "A", PARADISE shall develop, produce and
launch the disaster relief marketing plan and a summer advertising campaign as directed by
the Tourism Director or County Manager.
2. Section 2 of said Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following paragraph
inserted in its place.
PA YMENT. The maximum amount to be paid under this Agreement shall be Seven
Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000). PARADISE shall be paid in accordance with
fiscal procedures of the COUNTY for the expenditures incurred for the promotion and
advertising expenses as described in Section I upon submittal of an invoice and upon
verification that the services described in the invoice are completed or that the goods have
been received.
PARADISE shall detennine that the goods and services have been properly provided, and
shall submit invoices to the Tourism Director or his designee. The Tourism Director or his
designee shall detennine that the invoice payments are authorized and that the goods or
services covered by such invoice have been provided or perfonned in accordance with such
authorization. The line item budget attached as Exhibit "A" shall constitute authorization of
the expenditure described in the invoices provided that such expenditure is made in
accordance with this Agreement.
Each invoice submitted by PARADISE shall be itemized in sufficient detail for audit thereof
and shall be supported by copies of corresponding vendor invoices and proof of receipt of
goods or perfonnance of the services invoiced. PARADISE shall certify in writing that all
subcontractors and vendors have been paid for work and materials from previous payments
received prior to receipt of any further payments, The COUNTY shall not pay PARADISE
until the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners pre-audits payment invoices in
accordance with the law.
PARADISE shall be paid for its actual cost not to exceed the total amount for various line
items and up to the maximum amount budgeted pursuant to the attached Exhibit "A", The
amounts applicable to the various line items of Exhibit "A", subject to the maximum total
amount, may be increased or decreased by up to ten percent (10%) at the discretion of
PARADISE. Adjustment in excess often percent (10%) of any line item must be authorized
by the Tourism Director or his designee.
3. Exhibit "A" to said Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and Exhibit "A" attached to
this First Amendment is inserted in its place.
4. Except as set forth in this First Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed by
their duly authorized officers and their official seals, hereto affixed the day and year first written
above.
DATED:
A TrEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
, Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Heidi F. Ashton
Assistant County Attorney
WITNESSES:
PARADISE ADVERTISING AGENCY, INe.
(I)
signature
By:
PrintedfTyped Name
CEDAR HAMES. President
(2)
signature
PrintedfTyped Name
(Corporate Seal)
CP:TDC\l51 Amend 2004/2005 Paradise Advertising
~ \bt=3
5/10 {oS
EXHIBIT A
BUDGET
DISASTER RELIEF:
. Cable TV
· Online Push Technology
· Production: TV/E-Mails/Landings Page
TV - 2 versions
E-mails - 3 versions
Website Pop-Up &' Landings Page
SUMMER ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN:
. Cable TV
· Print Ads
. Production
TOTAL
.lb~
SilO let.
$ 275,000
$ 5,000
$ 20,000
S 350,000
$ 75.000
S 25.000
$ 750,000
Agenda Item No. 16F4
May 10,2005
Page 1 of 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners Approve the Purchase of a
Ford Tractor, Mode] TS 115A from Landig Tractor Company, Inc. in the amount of
$53.9] 8.42 under Florida 5;:ne Contract #765-900-04-1
OBJECTIVE; To approve the purchase of a rord Tractor, Model TS 115A il'om Landig
Tractor Company, Inc. in the amount of $53,918.42 under Florida Sate Contract #765-
900-04-1 .
CONSIDERATIONS:
Landig Tractor Company, Inc. is the awarded vendor for Ford Tractor, Mode] TS 115A
under F]orida State Contract #765-900-04-1. Therefore, staff requests that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the purchase of a Ford Tractor, Model TS IISA from
Landig Tractor Company, Inc.
,.."....,^.
FISCAL lMPACT: The Fiscal Impact of this purchase IS $53,918.42 with funds
available in the Pelican Bay Water Management Fund 109.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT: None
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the
purchase of a Ford Tractor, Model TS 115A from Landig Tractor Company, Inc. in the
amount of $53,918.42 under Florida State Contract #765-900-04-1.
Prepared by: Kyle Lukasz, Field Operations Manager
.,"....-
Agel1da Item No. 16F4
May 10. 2005
Page 2 of 5
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16F4
Meeting Date
ReCDmmendatlOn that the BDard Df CDunty CommissiDners ApprDve the Purchase of a
Ford Tractor, Model TS115A from ~andlg Tractor Company. Inc. In the amount of
$5391842 under Florida State Contract #765-900-04,1
5/10120059:00'00 AM
Prep3 red By
Date
Kyle Lukasz
OperatIOns Manager
4i27/2005 8:51 :07 AM
County Manager's Office
Pelica l'l Bay Services
Approved By
V:',
Date
i..lI:
Approved By
Kyie LukaS2
Qperattons Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
Pelican Bay Services
4/27/2005 2:08 PM
Approved By
Jack P. Curran
Purchasing Agent
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4123/2005 12:00 PM
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General SVcs Director
Date
Adminlstrativc Services
Purchasing
412812005 12:43 PM
Approved By
Mike Hauer
Acquisition Mallager
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/23/2005 5: 23 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4"29120057:52 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management &. Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Of lice 01 Management & Budget
4/29,.200510:29 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4130/200512:40 PM
-;
Landig Tractor Co., Inc.
6429 Causeway Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33619
813.s23.3673
FAJ(:813.628~282
www.landigtractor.com
Agenda Item No. 16F4
ft... 2005
of 5
~,
tBllQ.LAN)
STATE CONTRACT # 765-900-04-1
4'~ 1/200t'
PREPARED FOP
COLLIER COUNT. FLE::T MANAGEMEI\-
ATTN: LYNN EVANS
LynnEvans@colliergov.net
PREPARED BY:
DREW ROEMER
droemer@landigtractor.com
cell # (941)915-9945
COMMODITY
QTY. CODe
DESCRIPTION
RETAil CONTRACT DISCOUNT
PRICE PERCENT PRice
EACH DISCOUNT EACH PRICE
1 765-900-4761 TS115A 4WD TRACTOR $59,802.00 34.11% $39,403.54 $39,403.54
MODEL CODE BN15C4 (305 PACKAGE)
CAB WITH AIR CONDITIONING AND HEAT; lWO REMOTES STD.; AUTO SHUTDOWN
95 PTO HORSEPOWER; 16 x 16 ELECTROSHIFT TRANSMISSION WI LH SHUTTLE
1 04 AG TIRE OPTION $4 013.00 34.11% $2,644.17 $2,644.17
.."-"--
18.4 x 34 R1 REAR
14.9 X 24 R1 FRONT
1 082 FUEL TANK GUARD $202.00 34.11% $133.10 $133.10
1 102 TWO ADD'L REAR VALVES. $1,300.00 34.11 % $856.57 $856.57
1 0124 MID-MOUNT VALVE/JOYSTICK $902,00 NET $902,00 $902.00
1 0005 ROTARY BEACON $300.00 NET $300.00 $300.00
~--_.._._------
'*TOTAL OF FOUR(4) REAR VALVES
1 56LBMM FRONT LOADER (500 PKGl $8,233.00 6.00% $7,739.02 $7,739.02
INCLUDES: SELF LEVELING; FRONT BRACKETS' HOSE KIT
QT MOUNT PLATE' QT 84" BUCKET
._-~.
1 87436770 REAR MOUNTING KIT $442.86 6.00% $416.29 $416.29
1 330 _E3QhLQJ'Ijc:;UTTfNG EDGE $249.00 6.00% $234.06 $234.06
1 180 FRONT BUMPER/GUARD $205.00 6.00% $192,70 $192.70
1---'-
1 309 48" QT PALLET FORKS $1,167.00 6.00% $1,096.98 $1,096.98
--.--
TOTAL. $53,918.42
PRICE INCLUDES ALL STANDARD EQUIPMENT AND BACKUP ALARM PER CONTRACT
....
..
a
.~,
II_
~f'
!EWtfXl.AN)
I~"
Suite 3 I 5
PaQe I of 2
Agenda Ite~ No. 16F4
May 10.2005
Page 4 of 5
Suite 315
CERTl""ICA TION OF CONTRACT
,_om _. _. __. _.~,."..__.. ___., ,"""'U'U' .... ....., _._......____.._..... ......... .,',.__,_..,........"......,......,_.___'''A__.____~_.____.__..:._.
TITLE: TRACTORS, MOWERS & CUTTERS
CONTRACT NO. 765-900-04-1
ITB NO.' 6-070-840-P
E.F1='~C'l~\,fE- -rv1ar::.h:~. ~004
;'"(' t.' rU(1 t,\1 28. :~(lr).."
: D : -~.~'\t~L-_J
7 t. ~~-: - 9(J(,.-G':: ~
CONTRACTOR(S) Agco Corporation
Alamo Sales
Briggs Equipment
Cobb's Triang.le Tractor Inc.
Creel Tractor Company
Gulf Coast Tractor & Equipment
Hall Manufacturing
John Deere Company
Landig Tractor Co., Inc.
Motrim South, Inc.
Nortrax, Inc.
Pippin Tractor & Equipment
Ring Power Corporation
Schulte US,A., Inc.
Superior Tractor Company
Triple D Equipment, Inc.
~,_,,_'_____'" _.___.,~._._._.__._.n .._""._.... ".~~-~-.--------_._... ...... ........,..-. . ...-.-----.---..-~._-----_....,-.,........'''.
A AUTli<JBJIY_- Upon affirmative action taken by the State of Florida Department of
Management Services, a contract has been executed between the State of Florida and the
designated contractors.
B BfFECT - This contract Vlas entered into to provide economies in the purchase of Tractors,
Mowers & Cutters by all State of Florida agencies and institutions. Therefore, in compliance
with Sec60n 287.042, Florida Statutes, all purchases of these commodities shall be made under
the terms, pr.ices, and conditions of this contract and with the suppliers specified.
c. QRJ>EBJNGJNSmUCTIQNS - All purchase orders shall be issued in accordance with the
attached ordering instmctions. Purchaser shall order at the prices indicated, exclusive of all
Federal, State and locallaxes,
All contract purchase orders shall show the State Purchasing contract number, product number,
quantity, description of item, with unit prices extended and purchase order totaled. (This
requirement may be waived when purchase is made by a blanket purchase order.)
D. CQNTRACI~!RPE.RFQRMAl'9J::E - Agencies shall report any vendor failure to perform
according to the requirements of this contract on Complaint to Vendor, form PUR. 7017. Should
the vendor fail to correct tbe problem within a prescribed period oftime, then foml PUR 7029,
Request for Assistance, is to be filed with this oUke.
http://www.myt1ooda.com!stcontractsI765900041/certitication.htm
4/22/2005
Suite 315 Page2of2
Agenda Item No. 16F4
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 5
E. SPI;:.CLL\L A:t-l.I.2GF:NEB,,_~LCQNPlnQNS - Special and general conditions are enclosed for
your information Any restrictions accepted from the supplier are noted on the ordering
instructions.
F. CONTRACT APJ:>.R_AISAI. FORM - State Contract Appraisal, foml PUR 7073 should be used
to provide your input and recommendations for improvements in the contract to State Purchasing
for receipt no later than 90 days prior to the expiration date of this contract.
-~JI~.IO-'- :~_~>~ =d:t" ~1~-_llr2
SPD/jdb
Attachments
hh.",'I/unvnr ""d,'",'; r1" co,..."" I"t ("',,,,ntr<>("'t,,/7A,,\Q()()()Lll /(.",rt, f; ("'"ti rm ht-rn
Lln,., !'Inn"
Agenda Item No. 16G1
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve Contract Amendment A-2 involving Contract #03-3473 "Consultant Services for
Preparation of a Land Development Overlay for Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community
Redevelopment Area (CRA) District"
OBJECTIVE: To increase hourly rates for personnel in conjunction with'the 2005 CPllndex
and to add personnel categories
.QQNSIDERAT IONS: Collier Count\' i2 presenti) unCie, conO'EI:::, ,v': :-:::;;: E,'i9irl~enn; ~iC. b
the: ajove reierenced project.
The referenced contract has been amended to increase the hourly personnel rates in
conjunction with the February 23, 2005 Consumer Pricing Index (CPI) of 3.0%. These contract
prices are based on standard fee schedules, which have not been updated since the
commencement of the contract in 2003.
'~-''''1
The fee schedule will affect the hourly rates for work being provided under the original Contract
and all Amendments subsequent to A-1. Also identified in Schedule A-2 is the addition of four
(4) professional personnel categories to the project.
The hourly rate increases will not apply to work being provided under Amendment No. 03-3473-
A01, which was generated by Stormwater Management for a specific project.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are budgeted in each using departmentISJrespective cost center as
needed to meet the 3.0% hourly rate increases.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact associated with
this Exe<;:utive Summary.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Approve Contract
Amendment A-2, and 2. Authorize the Purchasing/General Services Director to sign the
Amendment.
PREPARED BY: Linda Jackson, Contract Specialist, Purchasing Department
,...~...,..
Agenda Item No. 1681
May 10, 2005
Page 2 oi 6
COLLIER COUNTY
-I
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16G-1
This Item continued from the April 26. 2005 BCC Meeting Recommendation to approve
Contract Amendment A-2 involving Contract #03-3473 "Consultant Services for
Preparation of a Land Developmenl Overlay for Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community
Redevelopment Area (CR/I.) District'
Meeting Date
5/10/200590000 AM
Approved By
,. (j ~~(
"3 It\ ::...~?V,-;
~:h< . ~ 1rnenta) 5e7"\..-I(;12S
'-lpH"';(-;ns~\ :;- ~;ianni:l~i
4/1:','::UG51:."':
Approved By
Linda Jackson
Contracts Agent
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/13/2005 3:49 PM
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Purchasing/General Svcs Director
Date
Administrative Services
Purchasing
4/13/20054:02 PM
Approved By
Gerald Kurtz
Senior Engineer
Date
Transportion Services
Stormwater Management
4/13/20055;34 PM
Approved By
Ricardo Valera
Director
Date
Transportion Services
Stormwater Management
4/14/200510:00 AM
Approved By
Stan Litsinger
Comprehensive Planning Director
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Comprehensive Planning
4/141200511 :55 AM
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Services Admin.
4/1412005 2:37 PM
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/14/20054:04 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/14/20055:07 PM
Approved By
......,..
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
514/2005 2:37 PM
Agenda Item No. 16G 1
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 6
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manafjer
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Marlager's Office
5/4/2005 4:56 PM
4. ~ .....
EXHIBIT A-2 Contract Amendment No. 02
Agenda Item No. 16G1
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 6
-I
!
#03-3473 "Consultant Services for Preparation of a Land Development Overlay for
BayshorelGateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) District"
This amendment, dated to the referenced agreement shall be by and between the
parties to the original Agreement, HDR Engineering, Inc., (to be referred to as "Consultant") and Collier
County, Florida. (to be referred to as "Owner").
Statement of Understanding
RE: Contract # 03-3473 "Consultant Services for Preoaration of a Land Development Overlay for
E~?~, ':~:,:-': "::-e/G2t"~'~~ay ~~ -i:L.1"'tgle. C..-~=rr:J:.l:li~:' r~ed':~\"e!':l':-1:-"I~:::1: .L>:..J-et. (CP._.Ll.,':: :C~~stric~'"
Tne Cons~,-,;_ani. agrees I :i:Ilenci the above reierenced Contra:::t a:. per Schedule' .'-,,-2" anached ',. tIll"
Amendment, and incorpo:-ated herein by reference.
This amendment shall cover hourly rate increases to the original Collier County Proposed Fee Schedule
based upon the Consumer Pricing Index (CPl). published February 23, 2005. Amendment No. 02
represents a 3.0% (Cpr) increase to the Fee Schedule to the Contract from April 12,2005 to December
16, 2006.
The fee schedule will affect the hourly rates for Work being provided as set forth under the original
Contract and all subsequent Amendments. Also identified in Schedule A-2 is the addition of four (4)
professional positions to the project.
The hourly rate increases will not apply to Work being provided under Amendment No. 03-3473-AOl,
which was generated by Stormwater Management.
The Consultant agrees that this amends the original Contract. All other terms and conditions of the
agreement shall remain in force.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Consultant and the Owner have each, respectively, by an authorized
person or agent, hereunder set their bands and seals on the date( s) indicated below.
CONSULTANT:
HD~-'6~ ~.
By: 1Jr~j) f. ~ ~.
Title: . v-rlC bJ
Dated: J - ~~--7-d1f
CORPORATE SEAL
Approved as to form and
~ifi)4
OWNER:
Scott R. Teach
Assistant County Attorney
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Stephen Y. Carnell
Director of Purchasing and General Services
Agenda Item No. 16G
May 10, 200
Page 5 of
Schedule A-2
Collier County Proposed Fee Schedule
RFP 03-3473
"Consultant Services for Preparation of a Land Development Overlay for
Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) District"
~rnf('''~iQ!l2 '
B ~u;Ib. _Ra!f':~
Office~
.0:
Sr. Project Manager
$137.00
Project Principal Urban Design
$142.00
Planner / Landscape Architect
$ 86.00
Sr. Market Analyst
$149.00
Sr. Traffic / Transportation Planner
$139.00
Sf. Landscape Architect*
$110.00
Sr. Engineer*
$103.00
Engineer*
$ 93.00
CADD Technician*
$ 70.00
Administrative / Clerical
$ 59.00
* Added professional positions.
This list is not intended to be all-inclusive. The COWlty and firm on a project-by-project
basis as needed shall mutually negotiate hourly rate fees for other categories of
professionals and/or specialists, support and other services.
END OF SCHEDULE A-2
Agenda Item No. 16G1
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 6
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ms Linda,
The CRA-AS approved the fee schedule increase request by HDR for 3% and addition of
professional personnel.
JacksonDavid
Wednesday, April 13. 2005 9:39 AM
JacksonLinda
CRA-AS Approved Fee Schedule Increase for HDR
Agenda Item No. 16G2
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve a budget amendment for $161,000 to increase budgeted revenues
and budgeted expenses for the sale and purchase of aviation fuel at Marco
Island Executive Airport
()8JECTIVE: --: 2 ::::::uire approval of a budget amendment to reeel\!2 arid spe~ld
additional tunas for tne sale and purchase of aviation fuel because of an increasE
in the selling price and purchase cost per gallon of aviation fuel.
CONSIDERATIONS: In preparing the FY05 budget, the average cost per gallon
of Jet A fuel for Marco Island Executive Airport was budgeted to be $1.60, Thus
far this year, the cost has been averaging $1.97. For every dollar increase in the
cost of fuel, there is a corresponding dollar-for-dollar increase in the selling price.
The markup on fuel sales is a fixed amount per gallon, This means that the
increase in the cost of fuel purchases is offset by an increase in the amounts
received for fuel sales.
--,
Because of the increased unit cost of fuel, the budget authorization for the
amount to be spent on fuel purchases at Marco Island Executive Airport has
been nearly exhausted. In order to purchase additional quantities of fuel for the
balance of the year, the budget authorizations will have to be increased.
96,000 gallons of Jet A fuel costing $216,000 are projected to be needed for the
balance of the year. The budget has $55,000 remaining, leaving an additional
requirement of $161,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of this budget amendment request for
Airport Authority Fund (495) nets to zero. The budget for Jet Fuel Expense will
be increased by $161,000. The revenue budget for Airport Jet A will be
increased by $161,000.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact
associated with this Executive Summary.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve a
budget amendment for $161,000 to increase the budgeted revenues and
budgeted expenses for the sale and purchase of aviation fuel at Marco Island
Executive Airport.
.-'
.I\genda Item No. 16G2
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
-I
,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSiONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16G2
Meeting Date
Approve a budget amendment for Si61,OOO to increase budgeted revenues and budgeted
expenses for the sale and purchase of aViation fuel at Marco Island Executive Airport.
5/10/2005 9 00 00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Theresa M, Cook
Executive Director'
41ZS12005 10:21 :58 AM
Approved B~
Theresa hIt- Coo~
EXeGUUVE~ Ulf(;:ctOf
Date
County Manager's Office
Airport Authority
4/29/20053:53 PM
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/2/2005 9~09 AM
Approved By
Randy Greenwald
Management/Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/2/2005 9~29 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/2/2005 5~20 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
5/2/20056:19 PM
.-,..
Agenda Item No. 16G3
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners and the Collier County
Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) adopt an interlocal agreement between Collier
County and the CRA establishing policies for the CRA pertaining to purchasing,
personnel, contracting authority, and budgeting.
OBJECTIVE: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners and the Collier
_ ,Jum: _ Olr"iluni':. ':de\ _ ::1DIT- ,'- Agt~nc:\ I ac ," f,:i: . ~:..r q-' !)::'"'.,
.)llier ':::-C1U,-' :::;,_ 1r:, csu"f1;~ilin~ Dolicies for tne 'RA '''''.:T1aml:,_ t:: Dllrc:,:~;'!'
per-sonne;, ,~ontracting authorIl), anG ouageting.
...."..'....,
CONSIDERATIONS: On March 12,2004, the CRA entered into an agreement establishing an
Executive Director for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area. When the
Executive Director resigned before a replacement had been hired, the Redevelopment Area
found itself without any staff to operate its office, Recognizing the importance of continuity in
providing personnel services in the Redevelopment Area, at a December 29, 2004 emergency
meeting the Advisory Board decided to hire temporary help as a stopgap measure to staff the
redevelopment area until such time that a new Executive Director could be hired. Because of the
policy issues that arose as a result of hiring a temporary staff person, both the County and the
CRA agree that it would be mutually beneficial to establish clear guidelines for purchasing,
personnel, contracting authority and budgeting procedures. This action has been reviewed and
approved by the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA Advisory Board and the Bayshore/Gateway
Triangle Executive Director.
FISCAL IMPACT: The County will be reimbursed by the CRA for all direct and indirect costs
associated with services involving purchasing, personnel, contracting authority and budgeting;
and implementing the programs of, or providing legal services to, the Bayshore/Gateway
Triangle Redevelopment Area. Funding will come from the trust account for the
Bayshore/Gateway CRA, Fund 187.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas
within the County.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The recommended action is consistent with all applicable
constitutional and general law, and complies with adopted County and CRA regulations, and
thus, is legally sufficient for the Board's consideration and approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners and the
Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) adopt an interlocal agreement
between Collier County and the CRA establishing policies for the CRA pertaining to purchasing,
personnel, contracting authority, and budgeting.
~A""~'~
Prepared By: John David Moss, AICP, Senior Planner, Comprehensive Planning
Item Number
Item Summary
16G3
Agenda Item No. 16G3
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 9
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners and the Collier County
Community Redevelopment Agency (eRA) adopt an interlocal agreement between Collier
County and the CRA establishing policies for the CRA pertaining to purchasing. personnel,
contracting authority, and budgeting.
5/10/2005 90000 AM
Meeting Date
Prepared B~
Date
f:~
L.M
":ilr",.:
Approved B~
Stan Litsinger
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Comprehensive Planning Director
Date
Comprehensive Planning
4/26/20059:08 AM
Approved By
Sandra Lea
Community Development &
Environmentat Services
Ex.ecutive Secretary
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4/26120059:12 AM
Approved By
Constance A. Johnson
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
Date
4/261200510:24 AM
Approved By
Patrick G. White
County Attorney
Assistant County Attorney
Date
County Attorney Office
4128/20052:31 PM
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services Adminstrator
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
4/2812005 4:20 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
County Manager's Office
Administrative Assistant
Date
Office of Management & Budget
4128/20054:38 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
County Manager's Office
Budget Analyst
Date
Office of Management & Budget
512/2005 12:36 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
County Manager's Office
Management & Budget Director
Date
Office of Management & Budget
5/2/2005 5:36 PM
Approved By
Agenda Item No. 16G3
Mav 10, 2005
Page 3 of 9
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board 01 County
Comtnissloners
County Manager's Office
5/4/20059:55 AM
Agenda Item No. 16G3
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 9
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND
THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA)
ESTABLISHING POLICIES FOR THE CRA PERTAINING TO PURCHASING,
PERSONNEL, CONTRACTING AUTHORITY. AND BUDGETING
'", . \',
. } .; AGF
._ l,.,'~
.~ :1:.:..
~'ec_ '-.l' tl;i5
. 2005. by (lnd bel\v:":~,, Collier County. Flonda. a political
subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter called the "COUNTY") and the Collier
County Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA), a separate legally distinct public
body (hereinafter called the "CRA"), collectively called the "Parties."
RECIT ALS
WHEREAS, Section 125.01(1) 0), Florida Statutes, empowers the legislative and
governing body of a county to establish and administer community redevelopment
programs; and
WHEREAS, Section 125.01(1) (p), Florida Statutes, enables the legislative and
governing body of a county to enter into agreements with other governmental agencies
within or outside the boundaries of the county for jo int performance, or performance by
one unit in behalf of the other, or any of either agency's authorized functions; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.01(4), Florida Statutes, provides for public agencies
such as the County and CRA to exercise jointly any power, privilege, or authority which
such agencies share in common and which each might exercise separately; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.01 (5), Florida Statutes, provides for the joint exercise
of public agency powers in the form of an interlocal agreement; and
Page 1 of6
Agenda Item No. 16G3
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 9
WHEREAS, Section 163.400 (1) (c), Florida Statutes, provides that any public
body may do any and all things necessary to aid or cooperate in the planning or carrying
out of a community redevelopment plan and related activities: and
WHEREAS. Section 163.400 (1 ) (e), Florida Statutes, provides that any public
bod\' (eRA l. for the purr;"< of carrying 0:'- communi:-y redevelopment and related
~-l.:- ~ . \ - ~t -I .c.) ~
;?n~---, '\\'r~'~,;~ r;-"'\ f:\1::7-~r (l\'eo, aT"'" ~~:~..:,~)c: '~l--~t-r\.'ithc~a~.~ '^l~_
an) pro\lslon 0;- :'ule 0,- la\\ tc the contran, wit: another puolic booy (CO:.J~~TY)
respecting action to be taken and pursuant to any of the powers granted by this part,
including the furnishing of funds or other assistance in connection with community
redevelopment and related activities: and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has adopted Resolution 2000-
82, finding the existence of blighted areas in the unincorporated area of the County and
further finding that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment or combination
thereof, in such areas is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or
welfare of the residents of Collier County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has further
adopted Resolution 2000-83, declaring itself as the Collier County CRA to carry out and
implement the redevelopment powers and actions contemplated by Part III, Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes, within such areas; and authorizing the creation of advisory boards for
each component area of the community redevelopment area; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has adopted Ordinance 2000-
42, establishing redevelopment trust funds to provide for the funding of community
redevelopment within community redevelopment areas; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has adopted Resolution 2000-
181, adopting a Community Redevelopment Plan; and
Page 20f6
Agenda Item No. 16G3
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 9
WHEREAS, the Collier County CRA has adopted Resolution 2001-98, creating
the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board and the
Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board, and providing for membership, terms,
purpose, duties, organization, and rules of procedure; and
WHEP EAS. on March 12. 1004. the i'Rl r.'ntered into an initial afrreem"'1'
..,.
, 1 .1; ~"
~J :
c;hy.
, -.., ~ . ., '
, J.....,
I_' Tr~L:;-![;~
! ;"'" ~~
Axe::.. and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CRA are desirous of establishing a uniform
procedure for policies pertaining to purchasing, personnel, contracting authority, and
budgeting; and
WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge that establishing clear guidelines for their
interactions would be mutually beneficial.
WITNESSETH:
In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other valuable
consideration, the sufficiency of which is agreed to by the Parties, the COUNTY and the
CRA agree as follows:
Section I. Aereement.
1. The above Whereas clauses, as Recitals, are incorporated herein by reference and
made part of this Agreement as if stated below.
2. The CRA hereby agrees to assist and cooperate with the COUNTY by timely
requesting any administrative support required for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle
Redevelopment Area when the Redevelopment Area is without the services and/or
employment of its Executive Director, or when requested by the CRA on an "as needed"
basis from the County through notice to the County's designated agent.
Page 3 of6
Agenda Item No. 16G3
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 9
3. The COUNTY and the CRA agree that the CRA will adhere to the COUNTY's
policies procedures pertaining to purchasing, personnel, contracting authority, and
budgeting.
4. The Parties agree that whenever necessary for the COUNTY to assume the
administrative responsibilities for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area
when said Arc::; !c \;ithout the seo-\;:":>5 aJ:,~or ernC1hyment of its ExeClI" :'e Dire"" Y' tl~ll
r, '.\i 1
'1l:'-;C the C"(}':
Cilr~(:t an =~ ; idirect COSL __:,-~,so..:i~,.
':u
aaminislering the fun.::; I)ns. impleclemmg the programs oL or providing kgal services lu
the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area during such times.
Section II.
Amendments.
The CRA shall provide written notice to the COUNTY of amendments to any of the
aforementioned ordinances or resolutions and prior to the effective date of any such
amendment.
Section III. Notices.
All notices required under this agreement shall be directed to the following offices:
For the COlJNTY: Office of the County Manager
33011 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
For the CRA:
Donna Fiala, Chairman
Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency
33011 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Section IV. Hold Harmless-COUNTY.
The COUNTY agrees to hold the CRA harmless from all liability, which may result from
the negligent performance of the COUNTY's obligations as set forth herein, however this
paragraph shall not constitute a waiver of the County's sovereign immunity pursuant to
Florida Statutes, section 768.28.
Page 4 of6
Agenda Item No. 16G3
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 9
-I
i
I
Section V. Hold Harmless-eRA.
The CRA agrees to hold the COUNTY harmless from all liability, which may result from
the negligent performance of the CRA's obligations as set forth herein, done in
accordance with the tenTIS of this agreement.
,",'. i' VI. T]',; ;mer]oca ~lf!'c:;::11ent SiLl .'
, -ie::, ~r: !tie Put)J1C r~ecorG:
_ 01: ; o:r
Count) .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and
year first above written.
DA TED:
ATTEST: Dwight E. Brock, Clerk COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF COLLIER COUNTY
BY:
Deputy Clerk
Donna Fiala, Chairman
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Patrick G. White, Assistant County Attorney
Page 5 of6
DATED:
ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk
Deputy C lerL
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
David C. Weigel, County Attorney
Agenda item No. 1683
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 9
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
b 1.
Page 6 of6
1- red V, . Coylt. (:naI~!Tlar
Agenda Item No. 16H1
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMISSIONER REQUEST FOR BOARD APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT TO
ATTEND FUNCTION SERVING A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to declare a valid public
purpose for a Commissioner to attend function/event and approve payment by the Clerk.
CONSIDERATIONS: Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-410, the Board of County
Commissioners has determined that attendance at the functions of fraternal, business,
environmental, educational, charitable, social, professional, trade, homeowners, ethnic,
and civic association/organizations serves a valid public purpose, provided that said
functions reasonably relate to Collier County matters.
COMMISSIONER: Donna Fiala
FUNCTIONIEVENT: Marine Corps League of Naples Annual Press Day Luncheon
PUBLIC PURPOSE: Honor the Free Press of America & Mr. Enrie Pyle, who gave his
live on April 18, 1945 during the Pacific Campaign. Interact with community leaders and
consitutents.
DATE OF FUNCTIONIEVENT: Wednesday, April 20, 2005
FISCAL IMPACT: $13.00 Funds to be paid from Commissioner's travel budget.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners, in accordance with
Resolution No. 99-410. approve payment by the Clerk for Commissioner Donna Fiala to
attend function serving a valid public purpose.
PREPARED BY: Kathy Highbaugh, Executive Aide to BCC
APPROVED BY: Sue Filson, Executive Manager to BCC
AGENDA DATE: May 10, 2005
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 16H1
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16H1
Commissioner Fiala requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function
serving a valid public purpose. Attended the Marine Corps League of Naples First Annual
Press Day Luncheon on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 at the Elks Lodge; $13.00 to be paid
from Commissioner Fiala's travel budget.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Kathy Highbaugh
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Aide to the BCe
4/25/2005 2:36:28 PM
Approved By
BCC Office
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
4/27/200510:33 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/27/2005 4:22 PM
l
!
.-..,
04/04/05 MON 00: 58 FAX 239434923{J Rhona Saunders I4J 001
_ ~ ~ #genda Item No. 1!H1
K.e'ti/ - 1:3 ~t1 ~ ~ of?- M~a~~} ~~
, 1:sVf/. ~ (j~.....-__;J) ,~i~
. dfp'tu aakumo7-~ t/!u;. 60th a.nnJne'C.1aJr.y ]
of the. b-a.f.J:iE. fo't <Dkin.a.wa. in. tk. SPa.aifw C!amfa.0n..
tOn. thlJ. day WE. wUi hanDf. the ~ ~ of cf/mz,Wla
~'<(5)' .f~~J L~_
v~.~ in ",c.wh >c many JaiJ"4!.u- to !.up .... ,~
~~ ~~ \\ ,,'l) cA." fi'ld ~na,= ~ c'Ulk fPyt., uk 9""'" {;u t+
cP'~
~o\ on. dfp'tU18J 1945 durc.i.ng th.s q:Jaaific. ~n.. .--
, [n~ i~;::
....
/
1
lt~~ 1 ,/
E1 9)/'1 '
~ ~~rJ ~
~~~. ~\O~ ~4l'
'l\f 1\\ C\
Q)J~'l. r:Jh.c,rruu ........ ':Jfu. (U,tau 0/ ~ dfUlQ'C!J t!f~ anJ dVoaD. on, P!&l>'
Lt. eat. ~'l. !J(toGE.J f'U::E clh.m.y. ........ .~.Lf 1A."JJ.'t-1.imI:. ~uI of CV3Uo
cw~ 't.~ u.n1aa~ !:IOU't u.p'C~DE if you. au ~ to a.tWz.d.
r::Jh.e. E. CI. 23rc.Won ~~
. af th.e. dlI(a.'ti.ne &''tfti..11a.:Ju.e.' of c::N~
~fully ~uat tfie honot. of yout p~
at the. 9iut ~ ~ r.bay ..twuJ'u.on
rwdnE~d.ay, dlprr.U2D, 2005, ai.: 12:00 cNoon
Etc."J}.o~E. #2010
395() dfo.Jw cRad
.dV~, g~ir.ida.
guLd ~~u
P82e 1 of 1
Agenda Item 1'\10. 16H 1
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 4
Hlghbaugh_k
From: rncpherson_trisha
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 2:10 PM
To: Highbaugh_k
Subject: FW: IRMA: Trephan, Mike called. Returned Your Call
----Qr1ginal Message----
From: NancyRoslak@coIHergov.net [maUto:NancyFloslak@colllergov.net]
sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:36 PM
To: mcpherson_trIsha
Subject: IRMA: Trephan, Mike called. Returned Your Call
To: TrishaMcpherson@colliergov.net
Date: 04/14/2005 ",11me: 02:36PM
You received a Telephone Call
From: Trephan, Mike
Of: Marine Corp League of Naples
Phone: 263-0330
Returned Your Cau
Message:
He said to tell you that the cost for the meal is
$13.00. Make check out to Marine Corp League
of Naples. You can bring it with you or send it
later. nkr
Thanks,
IRMA
....-1
4/25/2005
".__....~-"-"'.
Agenda Item No. 16H2
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 3
,....".....,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMISSIONER REQUEST FOR BOARD APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT TO
ATTEND FUNCTION SERVING A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to declare a valid public
purpose for a Commissioner to attend function/event and approve payment by the Clerk.
CONSIDERATIONS: Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-4] 0, the Board of County
Commissioners has determined that attendance at the functions of fraternal, business,
environmental, educational, charitable, social, professional, trade, homeowners, ethnic,
and civic association/organizations serves a valid public purpose, provided that said
functions reasonably relate to Collier County matters.
COMMISSIONER: Donna Fiala
FUNCTION/EVENT: 2005 Collier County Sand Dollar Awards & Tourism Week
Luncheon Celebration
.-->
PUBLIC PURPOSE: Honor the recipients ofthe 2005 Sand Dollar Awards & celebrate
Tourim Week. Interact with community leaders, business owners, and constituents.
DATE OF FUNCTIONIEVENT: Wednesday, May] ], 2005
FISCAL IMPACT: $22.00 Funds to be paid from Commissioner's travel budget.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners, in accordance with
Resolution No. 99-4]0, approve payment by the Clerk for Commissioner Donna Fiala to
attend function serving a valid public purpose.
PREPARED BY: Kathy Highbaugh. Executive Aide to Bce
APPROVED BY: Sue Filson, Executive Manager to BCC
AGENDA DATE: May 10, 2005
,-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 16H2
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 3
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16H2
Commissioner Fiala requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function
serving a valid public purpose. Attended the 2005 Collier County Sand Dollar Awards &
Tourism Week Luncheon Celebration on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at the Naples Beach
Hotel & Golf Club: $22.00 to be paid from Commissioner Fiala's travel budget.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Date
Prepared By
Kathy Highbaugh
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Aide to the BCC
4/25/20053:13:45 PM
Approved By
BCC Office
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
4/27/200510:34 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/27/20054:24 PM
. Agenda Item No. 16H2
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 3
<<y\(
.,'\:. H COMM. RECiD COpy
\QJJ FH TH FC J(
RECEIVED
APR 2 1 2005
Board of County CommiSSioners
/'..~ Vtft/
K7N ,'. ,. 4: \ ?-s
1fY\fJJJV
The Director and Staff of the Greater Naples, Marco Island, Everglades
Convention & VISitors Bureau cordially invite you to attend the
2005 Collier County Sand Dollar Awards and
Tourism Week Luncheon Celebration
PIPIIIII CIIII
May 11,2005 at 11:30 am
Naples Beach Hotel & Golf Club
Mangrove Room on Clubhouse side
851 Gulf Shore Blvd. N
Naples, FL
~
$22.00 inclusive, make checks payable to Naples Beach Hotd
Please RSVP by May 6th to Gail Hambright 403-2384 or ~ilh~mbright@collic:rgov.net
No walk-in seating will be available
Agenda Item No. 16H3
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 3
.....-,..
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMISSIONER REQUEST FOR BOARD APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT TO
ATTEND FUNCTION SERVING A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to declare a valid public
purpose for a Commissioner to attend function/event and approve payment by the Clerk.
CONSIDERA TIONS: Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-410, the Board of County
Commissioners has determined that attendance at the functions of fraternal. business,
environmental, educational, charitable, social, professional, trade, homeowners, ethnic,
and civic association/organizations serves a valid public purpose, provided that said
functions reasonably relate to Collier County matters.
COMMISSIONER: Tom Henning
FUNCTIONIEVENT: 2005 Collier County Sand Dollar Awards and Tourism Week
Luncheon Celebration
-
PUBLIC PURPOSE: To interact with key tourism personnel from throughout Collier
County and celebrate the winners of the Sand Dollar Awards.
DATE OF FUNCTIONIEVENT: May 11, 2005.
FISCAL IMPACT: $22.00 Funds to be paid from Commissioner's travel budget.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners, in accordance with
Resolution No. 99-410, approve payment by the Clerk for Commissioner Tom Henning
to attend function serving a valid public purpose.
PREPARED BY: Sam Tucker, Executive Aide to BCC
APPROVED BY: Sue Filson, Executive Manager to BCC
AGENDA DATE: May 10, 2005
..-,-
n
. I
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 16H3
May 10, 2005
Page2of3
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16H3
Commissioner Henning requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a
function serving a valid public purpose. Attend the 2005 Collier County Sand Dollar Awards
& Tourism Week Luncheon Celebration on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at the Naples Beach
Hotel & Golf Club; $22.00 to be paid from Commissioner Henning's travel budget.
5/10/2005 9: 00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Sam Tucker
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Aide to the BCC
4/26/20054:18:20 PM
BCC Office
Approved By
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
4/27/200510:35 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/27120054:40 PM
r
r
".'
",-,
."-,
Agenda Item No
May 1
Pag
\]
The Director and Staff of the Greater Naples, Marco Island, Everglades
Convention &.: Visitors Bureau cordially invite you to attend the
2005 Collier County Sand Dollar Awards and
Tourism Week Luncheon Celebration
PnIise coast
j
1
I
I
I
,I
1 I
L___..
.
j
I
I
Please RSVP by May 6th to Gail Hambright 403-2384 or gailhambright@colliergov.net I
No walk-in seating will be available J
.._',,~ .,. __~,''''''''..'. ",_"~^,-",_.,.,~,~__,,,,'____A__~'___"""_'''.'_''~'~'''''_."_.,"ri""''''<~__- .
May II, 2005 at 11 :30 am
Naples Beach Hotel &: Golf Club
Mangrove Room on Clubhouse side
851 Gulf Shore Blvd. N
Naples, FL
$22.00 inclusive. make checks payable to Naples Beach Hotel
Agenda Item No. 16H4
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMISSIONER REQUEST FOR BOARD APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT TO
ATTEND FUNCTION SERVING A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to declare a valid public
purpose for a Commissioner to attend function/event and approve payment by the Clerk.
CONSIDERATIONS: Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-410, the Board of County
Commissioners has determined that attendance at the functions offraternal. business,
environmental, educational, charitable. social, professional, trade, homeowners, ethnic,
and civic association/organizations serves a valid public purpose, provided that said
functions reasonably relate to Collier County matters.
COMMISSIONER: Jim Coletta
FUNCTIONIEVENT: David Ellis's Farewell Function
,.,.......,.\
I I
PUBLIC PURPOSE: To represent the County to show appreciation for everything
David Ellis has done for the County in his capacity as an advisory board member and
Executive Vice President of CBIA and to wish him well in his new endeavor
"~--_..:..-/
DATE OF FUNCTIONIEVENT: May 9,2005
FISCAL IMPACT: $10.00 payable to the Collier Building Industry Association. Funds
to be paid from Commissioner's travel budget.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners, in accordance with
Resolution No. 99-410, approve payment by the Clerk for Commissioner Jim Coletta to
attend function serving a valid public purpose.
PREPARED BY: Nancy Rosiak, Executive Aide to BCC
APPROVED BY: Sue Filson. Executive Manager to BCC
AGENDA DATE: April 26, 2005
i~'
',-,..-,/
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 16H4
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 3
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16H4
Commissioner Coletta requests Board approval for payment for attending a function
serving a valid public purpose. Commissioner to attend the David Ellis's Farewell Function
on May 9, 2005 at the Collier Building Industry Association's office. $10.00 to be
reimbursed from Commissioner Coletta's travel budget.
5/10/2005 9:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Nancy Rosiak
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Aide to the BCC
4/26/20054:18:20 PM
Approved By
BCC Office
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
4/29/2005 4:52 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
5/2/2005 11 :25 AM
...,..
"t. ;....
.
.
Agenda Item No. 16H4
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 3
Agenda Item No. 16H5
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMISSIONER REQUEST FOR BOARD APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT TO
ATTEND FUNCTION SERVING A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to declare a valid public
purpose for a Commissioner to attend function/event and approve payment by the Clerk.
CONSIDERATIONS: Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-410. the Board of County
Commissioners has determined that attendance at the functions of fraternal, business.
environmental, educational, charitable, social, professional, trade, homeowners. ethnic.
and civic association/organizations serves a valid public purpose, provided that said
functions reasonably relate to Collier County matters.
COMMISSIONER: Jim Coletta
FUNCTIONIEVENT: Economic Development Council's Membership Mixer
PUBLIC PURPOSE: Interact with community and business members and support the
efforts of the Economic Development Council
DATE OF FUNCTIONIEVENT: May 4,2005
FISCAL IMPACT: $15.00 Funds to be paid from Commissioner's travel budget.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners. in accordance with
Resolution No. 99-410, approve payment by the Clerk for Commissioner Jim Coletta to
attend function serving a valid public purpose.
PREPARED BY: Nancy Rosiak, Executive Aide to BCC
APPROVED BY: Sue Filson, Executive Manager to BCC
AGENDA DATE: April 26, 2005
-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 16H5
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 3
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16H5
Commissioner Coletta requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function
serving a valid public purpose. Commissioner to attend the Economic Development
Council Membership Mixer hosted by Edison College on May 4, 2005 at Edison College
Collier Campus. $15.00 to be reimbursed from Commissioner Coletta's travel budget.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Nancy Rosiak
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Aide to the BCe
4/26/20054:18:20 PM
Approved By
Bee Office
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
4/29/20054:54 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
5/2/200511:26 AM
Agenda Item No. 16H5
May 10, 2005
Response Form Page 3 of 3
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
OF COLLIER COUNTY
NAPLES. FLORIDA
EVERGLADES CITY' GOlDEN GATE
IMMOKALEE ' MARCO ISLAND
MEMBERSHIP MIXER
HOSTED BY
EDISON COLLEGE
7007 LELYCULTURALPARKWAY \~.t>O
NAPLES,FL34113 $ ~
WEDNESDAY, MAY 4, 2005 ~ ~CU
~
MIXER 5:30 P.M. .. 7:00 P.M
COMPUMENTARY HORS D'OEUVREB
AND REFRESHMENTS WILL BE SERVED.
COM~THISFORMANDRETVRNBYMONDA~ MAy 2, TO:
Mail: Economic Development Council of Collier County
3050 N. Horseshoe Drive, #120, Naples, FL 34104
Fax: (239) 263-6021 · Phone: (239) 263-8989
E-mail: events@eNaplesFlorida.com
On-line: www.eNaplesFlorida.com
Name(s) of Attendees:
Cofn(nl("~C)lff\1GR JIlY\ (~-'J \e:ttl~L
Company Name: Cc ill.t'-( (~;11t\f1.( ?-x'" ~.t-
Phone Number: ~'~ ~orr1
EDC BENEFACTOR INVESTOR:
.
"W'"ACHOVIA
Agenda Item No, 16H6
May 10,2005
Page 1 of 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMISSIONER REQUEST FOR BOARD APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT TO
ATTEND FUNCTION SERVING A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to declare a valid public
purpose for a Commissioner to attend function/event and approve payment by the Clerk.
CONSIDERATIONS: Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-410, the Board of County
Commissioners has determined that attendance at the functions of fraternal, business,
environmental. educational, charitable, social, professional, trade, homeowners, ethnic,
and civic association/organizations serves a valid public purpose, provided that said
functions reasonably relate to Collier County matters.
COMMISSIONER: Frank Halas
FUNCTIONIEVENT: Collier Building Industry Association going away party for
David Ellis at CBIA's office
.....--.
PUBLIC PURPOSE: Interact with community, business and construction industry
leaders and constituents.
DATE OF FUNCTION/EVENT: May 9.2005
FISCAL IMPACT: $10.00 Funds to be paid from Commissioner's travel budget.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners, in accordance with
Resolution No. 99-410. approve payment by the Clerk for Commissioner to attend
function serving a valid public purpose.
PREPARED BY: Trisha McPherson
APPROVED BY: Sue Filson, Executive Manager to BCC
AGENDA DATE: May 10, 2005
-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 16H6
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16H6
Commissioner Halas requests Board approval for payment for attending a function serving
a valid public purpose. Commissioner to attend the David Ellis's Farewell Function on May
9,2005 at the Collier Building Industry Association's office. $10.00 to be reimbursed from
Commissioner Halas' travel budget.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Trisha McPherson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Aide to the BCe
4/29/20054:46:24 PM
Bee Office
Approved By
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
4/2912005 4:51 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
512/200511:22 AM
......,...
.c<<-gJ~
(-; (,;..:.-,:>;.,-.\
<"'-Vq
..... 1,..,,;-- OJ'
/<> \\jJ-u.;/
\\~
~/
Agenda Item No. 16H6
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of4
\O~- p~ rv<u.~ V~~weJ-,
11L\-~1 -r~~~~
Agenda liBagbld. d~lll6
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 4
mcpherson_trisha
Subject: FW: Going Away Party for David Ellis
-----Original Message-----
From: rosiak_n
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 10:40 AM
To: Highbaugh_k; mcpherson_trisha; Springs Paula; tuckersam
Cc: filson_s
Subject: FW: Going Away Party for David Ellis
Ladies:
Here is the cost of David Ellis's Party, in case you need to put it on the agenda,
N tt V\,C ~ ROsttt R.
EXECUTIVE AIDE TO THE BCC
FOR COMMISSIONER JIM COLElTA, DISTRICT 5
PH: (239) 774-8097 /FAX: (239) 774-3602
-----Original Message-----
From: David Ellis [mailto:David@cbia.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 3:34 PM
To: rosiak_n
SUbject: RE: Going Away Party for David Ellis
$10
Collier Building Industry Association
4779 Enterprise Avenue
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 436-6100
..-,..
4/27/2005
....."
Agenda Item No. 16H7
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMISSIONER REQUEST FOR BOARD APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT TO
ATTEND FUNCTION SERVING A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to declare a valid public
purpose for a Commissioner to attend function/event and approve payment by the Clerk.
CONSIDERATIONS: Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-410, the Board of County
Commissioners has determined that attendance at the functions of fraternal, business,
environmental, educational, charitable, social, professional, trade, homeowners, ethnic,
and civic association/organizations serves a valid public purpose, provided that said
functions reasonably relate to Collier County matters.
COMMISSIONER: Donna Fiala
FUNCTIONIEVENT: David Ellis's Going Away Party
.-.-
PUBLIC PURPOSE: To interact with community, business, & construction industry
leaders and to show appreciation for all that David Ellis has done for the community, and
to wish him well.
DATE OF FUNCTIONIEVENT: Monday, May 9, 2005
FISCAL IMPACT: $]0.00 Funds to be paid from Commissioner's travel budget.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners, in accordance with
Resolution No. 99-410, approve payment by the Clerk for Commissioner Donna Fiala to
attend function serving a valid public purpose.
PREPARED BY: Kathy Highbaugh, Executive Aide to BCC
APPROVED BY: Sue Filson, Executive Manager to BCC
AGEND~ DATE: May 24, 2005
-
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No. 16H7
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of3
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16H7
Commissioner Fiala requests Board approval for reimbursement for attending a function
serving a valid public purpose. Attended CBIA Executive Director, David Ellis' Going Away
Party on Monday, May 19, 2005 at CBIA Offices; $10.00 to be paid from Commissioner
Fiala's travel budget.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Kathy Highbaugh
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Aide to the BCC
5/4/2005 12:05:46 PM
Approved By
BCC Office
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
Executive Manager to the BCC
Date
BCC Office
5/4/20051:20 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
5/4/20051:30 PM
"'-""1
Agenda Item No. 16H7
...-";...-;
I
I
___J
~'1
FOR BOARD ACTION:
Agenda Item No. 1611
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE
May 10, 2005
1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED:
A. Districts:
B. Minutes:
1.
2.
,,""-""
3.
4.
5.
",-
H:DatalFormat
I. Lely Community Development District - Minutes of September IS, 2004;
October 20,2004; November 11.2004; December 15,2004; January 19,
2005; February 16,2005; March 16.2005.
2. Verona Walk Community Development District - Proposed Budget FY
2005-06.
Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee - Minutes of
March 14,2005.
Lake Trafford Task Force - Minutes of March 2. 2005.
Lely Golf Estates Beautification M.S.T.U. -_Agenda for April 21, 2005;
Minutes of March 17.2005.
Ochopee Fire Control District - Minutes of February 8, 2005.
Pelican Bav Services - Agenda for April 20, 2005.
a) Budget Sub-Committee Minutes of March 16.2005.
6. Collier County Airport Authority - Minutes of March 14,2005; Voting
Conflict form for Robert E. Doyle.
7. Collier Countv Contractor's Licensing Board - Agenda for April 20, 2005.
8. Immokalee Beautification M.ST.U. Advisory Committee -_Agenda for
April 20, 2005; Minutes of March 16,2005.
9. Collier Count v Planning Commission - Agenda for April 21, 2005;
Minutes of March 17,2005
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Approved By
Sue Filson
Board of County
Commissioners
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1611
Miscellaneous Items to File for Record with Action as Directed.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Executive Manager to the BCC
BCC Office
Agenda Item No. 1611
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
Date
4/29/20053:54 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
County Manager's Office
4/29/2005 4:34 PM
Date
Agenda Item No. 16J1
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATIONS TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AND SPRINT TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA.
OBJECTIVE: To gain Board of County Commissioners approval of the attached Resolution between
the Board of County Commissioners and Sprint Telephone Company of Florida, for continuing the
existing
E-911 system.
CONSIDERATIONS: To provide an enhanced "911" emergency telephone system for the citizens of
Collier County.
1. A Resolution to be executed by the Board of County Commissioners to
allow Sprint Telephone Company of Florida to collect a fee at
$ .50 per month per access line to fund the cost of maintaining the
enhanced "911" system, from September 30,2005 to September 30,
2006.
2. The Board of County Commissioners authorizes the Sprint Telephone
Company of Florida to deduct an administrative fee equal to 1 % of the
monies collected for the enhanced "911 n emergency telephone system.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of funding this system will be paid by the subscribers. No ad valorem tax
dollars will be expended. The fee for FY 04-05 was $ .50. There is no increase in the fee. Any
reserves will be accumulated according to Statute.(199-91901 0-991 000-00000)
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subscribers will pay for the system.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners authorizes the Chairman to execute
the Resolution.
See attachment for Resolution.
PREPARED BY~ f? ~~
Sandi L. Chernoff, 911 C rdmator
DATE:
<f /;8 !o~
I I
.-.
'-'
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
County Manager's Office
Agenda Item No. 16J 1
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 3
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16J1
Recommendation to approve a Resolution between the Board of County Commissioners
and Sprint Telephone Company of Florida.
5/10/2005 9:00: 00 AM
Management & Budget Director
Date
Office of Management & Budget
4/26/2005 8:24 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/28/2005 4:20 PM
.....-..1
'....--,
Agenda Item No. 16J1
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 .
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLUER COUNTY,
flORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE IMPOSrnoN AND COLLEcnoN OF A LOCAL OPTION FEE
FOR PROVISION OF ENHANCED EMERGENCY "911" TELEPHONE SERVICE AND
EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, Section 365.171(13), Florida Statutes! provides that a county may impose a fee
for charges for '911' service and equipment to be paid. by IocaJ exchange subscribers on an
individual exchange basis at a rate not to exceed fitly cents ($.50) per month per access line; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, deems it
appropriate and in furtherance of public health, safety and welfare to access a 'ee for the enhanced
'911" telephone service availability in Collier County.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COlLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. Pursuant to Section 365.171 (13), Florida Statutes, there is hereby imposed against local
exchange subscribers a local option fee for the provision of enhance "911 · emergency telephone
service and equipment in Collier County. This fee shaD be adjusted annuaJly to cover allowable
expenses as descnbed in Section 365.171(13(a)(6),. Florida Statutes. For the period of September
30. 2005 through September 30, 2006. the fee WIn be $ .50 cents per month per subscriber per
access line.
2. The County requests that the telephone company (exchange telephone service provider)
providing enhanced '911" service and equipment to Collier County collect from its subscribers within
Collier County, the local option fee assessed by this Resolution and remit those fees to Collier
County.
3. Said telephone company, pursuant to Section 365.171 (13)(cl. Rorida Statutes. may retain as an
administrative fee an amount of one percent (1 %) of the tot8l 911" fees actually collected by said
telephone company.
4. Money in reserve is beilg carried foIwarcl to provide for capital improvements listed in Section
365.171(13)(a)(3), Aorida Statutes. Additional money from fiscal year 2005 rev9llJes to be added to
the total reserves shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of such fees billed for the 2004 fiscal year. The
cumulative reserves are to pay for projected expansion and replacement of E911 equipment and
service features described in S9ctiori 365.171 (a)(l 3)(6), Florida StaMes. All carTY forward reserves
shall be administered in accordance with Subsection 365.171(13), Florida Statutes.
This Resolution adopted on the
second and majority vote for adoption.
day of
, 2005, after motion.
DATED:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
BY:
Fred W. Coyle. Chairman
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to fonn and
legal sufficiency:
~h5~~
Assistant County Attomey
Agenda Item No. 16J2
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
~ ""'",-,.,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MAKE A
DETERMINATION OF WHETHER THE PURCHASES OF GOODS AND
SERVICES DOCUMENTED IN THE DETAILED REPORT OF OPEN PURCHASE
ORDERS SERVE A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXPENDITURE OF COUNTY FUNDS TO SATISFY SAID PURCHASES.
OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners make a
determination whether the purchase orders opened from April 2, 2005 through April 15,
2005 serve a valid public purpose and authorize the expenditure of County funds to
satisfy said purchases.
CONSIDERATIONS: To ensure compliance with State law, the Clerk's Office
has prepared a detail list of all purchase orders that have not previously been approved by
the Board of County Commissioners that were opened for the period April 2. 2005
through April 15, 2005. This report is available for inspection and review in the County
Manager's Office.
FISCAL IMPACT: The goods and services included in the aforementioned report have
all been previously appropriated.
.--'
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact
related to this item.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners make a
determination of whether the purchases of goods and services documented in the detailed
report of open purchase orders serve a valid public purpose and authorize the expenditure
of County funds to satisfy said purchases.
Prepared By:
~PC'~7
Constance C. Murray
General Operations Manager
Date:
.Jf/~//o~r
Reviewed and
Approved By:
(
Date:
Lf /zl/'l(]:)~
,.-.
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
County Manager's Office
Agenda Item No. 16J2
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16J2
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners make a determination of
whether the purchases of goods and services documented in the Detailed Report of Open
Purchase Orders opened from April 2, 2005 through April 15, 2005 serve a valid public
purpose and authorize the expenditure of County funds to satisfy said purchases. A copy
of the Detailed Report is on display in the County Manager's Office. Collier County
Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, 2nd Floor. W. Harmon Turner Building,
Naples, Florida.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Management & Budget Director
Date
Office of Management & Budget
5/1120054:10 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager Date
County Manager's Office 5/2/2005 11 :27 AM
Agenda Item No. 16K1
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 4
,,..-"t
Executive Summary
Recommendation to Approve an Agreed Order for Payment of Expert Fees
in Connection with Parcel 180 in the Lawsuit Styled Collier County v. Big
Corkscrew Island Fire District, et al., Case No. 02-2218-CA (Immokalee Road
Project #60018). Additional Cost to County is $7,050.00.
OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners approve an Agreed Order for payment
of expert fees incurred in connection with Parcel 180 in the lawsuit styled Collier County v. Big
Corkscrew Island Fire District, et al.. Case No. 02-2218-CA (Immokalee Road Project #60018).
CONSIDERATIONS: The County acquired the subject property by depositing the sum of
$5,100.00 into the registry of the Court on September 19. 2002; the County and Respondents
have negotiated and settled by Stipulated Final Judgment in the amount of $9,000.00 which was
approved by the Board on September 14. 2004.
To conclude this matter. the County is required to pay reasonable expert fees incurred by
Respondents in the defense of this matter.
. Expert Appraisal Fees:
. Expert Planning Fees:
TOTAL:
$5,250.00
$1,800.00
$7.050.00
.-,
Attached is the proposed Agreed Order.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $7,050.00 are available in the FY 2005 adopted
budget. Source of funds are Gas Taxes and Impact Fees.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: None.
RECOMMENDA TION: That the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Approve the Agreed Order as to Parcel 180; and
2. Approve the expenditure of funds as stated.
PREPARED BY: Heidi F. Ashton, Assistant County Attorney, Office of the County Attorney
-,
Agenda Item No, 16K1
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY
--.-
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16K1
Meeting Date
Recommendation to Approve an Agreed Order for Payment of Expert Fees in Connection
with Parcel 180 in the Lawsuit Styled Collier County v. Big Corkscrew Island Fire District, et
aI., Case No. 02-2218-CA (Immokaiee Road Project #60018). Additional Cost to County is
$7,050.00.
5/10/2005 9:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Heidi F. Ashton
Assistant County Attorney
4/18/2005 9:08:46 AM
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
Approved By
Sharon Newman
Accounting Supervisor
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/18/20051:54 PM
Approved By
Lisa Taylor
Management/Budget Analyst
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/26/200510:09 AM
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
~...."..
Transportion Services
Transportation Services Admin.
4/26/20052:16 PM
Approved By
Eugene Calvert
Principal Project Manager
Transportation Engineering and
Construction Management
Date
Transportations Services
4/26/20053:12 PM
Approved By
Kevin Hendricks
Right Of Way Acquisition Manager
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Engineering and
Construction
4/26/2005 6:03 PM
Approved By
David C. Weigel
County Attorney
Date
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
4/28/2005 9:04 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/28/2005 4:23 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 11 :59 AM
Approved By
.....,
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
4/30/200512:48 PM
Agenda Item No. 16K1
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 4
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIVIL ACTION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a
political subdivision of the State of
Florida,
Case No.: 02-2218-CA
Petitioner.
Parcel No.: 180
vs.
BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE
DISTRICT, et al.,
Respondents.
/
AGREED ORDER
THIS CAUSE, having come before the Court upon Joint Motion made by Petitioner,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, by and through the undersigned counsel, and Respondents,
ANDY R. MORGAN and BEVERLY E. MORGAN, by and through their undersigned counsel, for
entry of an Agreed Order, and the Court, being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Respondents, ANDY R. MORGAN and BEVERLY E.
MORGAN, receive from Petitioner, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, the sum of Five Thousand
Two Hundred Fifty Dollars and No/IOO ($5250.00) for appraisal fees incurred in connection with
Parcel 180; it is further
ORDERED that Respondents, ANDY R. MORGAN and BEVERLY E. MORGAN, receive
from Petitioner, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, the sum of One Thousand Eight Hundred
Dollars and No/IOO ($1800.00) for planning fees incurred in connection with Parcel 180; it is
further
--,.
Agenda Item No. 16K1
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 4
ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of receipt of this Order, Petitioner, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, shall disburse the sum of Seven Thousand Fifty Dollars and No/IOO
($7050.00) to the FORMAN HANRAITY & MONTGOMERY TRUST ACCOUNT c/o Vanessa
Thomas, Esquire, P. O. Box 159, Oeala, FL 34478-0159 for the benefit of Respondents.
DONE AND ORDERED this _ day of
,2005 in Naples, Collier County,
Florida.
CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE
Conformed copies to:
Heidi F. Ashton, Esquire
Vanessa Thomas, Esquire
E. Glenn Tucker, Esquire
"'"1 Bookkeeping
JOINT MOTION
The Parties, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby move for entry of the
foregoing Agreed Order as to Parcel 180.
~
Dated: -=i - (L-f -0 c:)
Dated:
LJQ~ ~
VANESSA THOMAS, ESQUIRE
Florida BarNo.: d7o;2Lfi~
FORMAN HANRA TrY & MONTGOMERY
PO Box 159
Ocala, FL 34478-0159
(352) 732-3915 - Telephone
(352) 351-1690 - Facsimile
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENTS
HEIDI F. ASHTON, ESQUIRE
Florida Bar No.: 0966770
OARCEOFTHECOUNTYAITORNEY
Harmon Turner Building
3301 East Tarniami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239) 774-8400 - Telephone
(239) 774-0225 - Facsimile
AITORNEY FOR PETmONER
-..
Agenda Item No. 16K2
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 6
--,
Executive Summary
Recommendation to Approve a Mediated Settlement Agreement and a Stipulated Final
Judgment to be Drafted Incorporating the Same Terms and Conditions as the Mediated
Settlement Agreement in the Amount of $13,250.00 for the Acquisition of Parcels 129 and 729
in the Lawsuit Styled Collier County v. Terry L. Liehliter, et al. Case No. 03-2273-CA (Golden
Gate Parkway Project No. 60027). Additional Cost to County is $7,281.00 after Credit for
Amount Deposited.
OBJECTIVE: That the Board approve a Mediated Settlement Agreement and a Stipulated Final
Judgment to be drafted incorporating the same terms and conditions as the Mediated Settlement
Agreement as full and final compensation to be paid for the acquisition of Parcels 129 and 729 in
the lawsuit styled Collier County v. Terry L. Lichliter, et al., Case No. 03-2273-CA (Golden Gate
Parkway Project No. 60027).
CONSIDERATIONS: The County acquired the subject property by depositing the sum of
$8,000.00 into the Court Registry on October 2, 2003. The County's last written offer was
$7,550.00 on December 9, 2002. The County and Respondent have negotiated a settlement of
$13,250.00 for full compensation. If the settlement is approved, the County is responsible for the
following costs:
.-
. Additional Deposit/Disbursement Amount:
. Expert Fees:
. Attorney's Fees:
. Clerk's Service Fee:
TOTAL:
$5,250.00
To be determined
$1,881.00
$ 150.00
$7,281.00
Attached is the Mediated Settlement Agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $7,281.00 are available in the FY 2005 adopted
budget. Source of funds are Impact Fees.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners:
1. approve the Mediated Settlement Agreement;
2. approve the Stipulated Final Judgment which incorporates the terms and
conditions of the Mediated Settlement Agreement to be presented to the
Court for entry;
3. approve the expenditure of funds as stated; and
4. direct staff to make disbursement of the funds.
--
PREPARED BY:
Heidi F. Ashton, Assistant County Attorney, Office of the County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 16K2
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 6
Agenda Item No. 16K2
May 10, 2005
Page3of6
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16K2
Meeting Date
Recommendation to Approve a Mediated Settlement Agreement and a Stipulated Final
Judgment to be Drafted Incorporating the Same Terms and Conditions as the Mediated
Settlement Agreement in the Amount of $13,250.00 for the Acquisition of Parcels 129 and
729 in the Lawsuit Styled Collier County v. Terry L. Lichliter, et al. Case No. 03-2273-CA
(Golden Gate Parkway Project No. 60027). Additional Cost to County is $7,281.00 after
Credit for Amount Deposited.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Date
Heidi F. Ashton
Assistant County Attorney
4/18/20059:31:30 AM
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
Approved By
Sharon Newman
Accounting Supervisor
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/18/20053:16 PM
Approved By
Lisa Taylor
Management/Budget Analyst
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/26/200510:11 AM
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Services Admin.
4/26/20052:19 PM
Approved By
Eugene Calvert
Principal Project Manager
Transportation Engineering and
Construction Management
Dale
Transportations Services
4/26/20053:13 PM
Approved By
Kevin Hendricks
Right Of Way Acquisition Manager
Transportation Engineering and
Construction
Date
Transportion Services
4/26/20056:06 PM
Approved By
David C. Weigel
County Attorney
Dale
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
4/28/2005 9:06 AM
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/28/2005 4:24 PM
Approved By
Susan Usher
Senior Management/Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 9:56 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
Agenda Item No, 16K2
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 6
(!
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/200512:00 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Comm issioners
County Manager's Office
4/30/200512:51 PM
....,..
Agenda Item No. 16K2
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 6
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
CIRCUIT CIVIL DMSION
COLLIER COUNTY. a political
subdivision of the State of Florida,
Petitioner,
Case No.: 03-2273-CA
v.
Parcel No.: 129 & 729
TERRY L. LICHLITER et al.
Respondents.
/
MEDIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
At the Mediation Conference held on April 14, 2005, the parties reached the
following Settlement Agreement:
1. Petitioner will pay to Respondents, Richard and Denise McPhillips, the
sum of $ f:3 '-.5"0. Ot) in full settlement of all claims for compensation from
Petitioner wOO{soever. including statutory interest, but excluding attorney's and experts' fees and
costs. Said sum will be subject to claims for apportionment, if any.
2. Petitioner is entitled to a credit in the amount of $ 8) a ca. Ot:)
which was previously deposited in the Registry of the Court in this case by Petitioner.
3. Counsel for Petitioner and Respondents will jointly submit to the Court
for signature a mutually approved Stipulated Final Judgment in this matter as soon as practical
hereafter.
4. Petitioner will pay Respondents the balance due of$ 5 ~So. ~ 0
within 3 tJ days of the actual date of receipt by Petitioner's counsel of a conformed copy of the
aforesaid Stipulated Final Judgment from the Court.
Agenda Item No. 16K2
May 10,2005
Page 6 of 6
/,.........
5. Collier County will pay $ ~.. 'B g \. 00. in statutory attorney's
fees pursuant to Section 73.092(1). Fla. Stat. The Court will retain jurisdiction to determine
apportionment issues. if any. and to determine experts' fees and costs and supplemental attorney's
fees, if any.
6. This agreement is subject to the approval of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County.
7. Attached hereto is an addendum to this Agreement.
~
Yes
.../' No
8.
any. contain(s) all 0
This Agreement, dated Apri114, 2005. and the attached addendum, if
e agreements of the parties.
1J~~
Attorney for Respondent
2
Agenda Item No. 16K3
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 8
.----
Executive Summarv
Recommendation for the Board of County Commissioners to Approve an
Agreed Order for Payment of Engineering Fees in the Amount of $3,200.00
in Connection with Parcels 131A and 131B in the Lawsuit Styled Collier
County v. Stonebridge Country Club Community Association, Inc., et al., Case
No. 04-3588-CA (Immokalee Road Project #66042).
OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners approve an Agreed Order for payment
of engineering fees in the amount of $3.200.00 incurred in connection with Parcels 13IA and
131 B in the lawsuit styled Collier County v. Stonebridge Country Club Community Association,
Inc., et al.. Case No. 04-3588-CA (Immokalee Road Project #66042).
CONSIDERATIONS: The County acquired the subject property by depositing the sum of
$44,800 into the registry of the Court on December 23,2004. The County and Respondent have
agreed to settle his interest in the easement for payment to his expert.
TOTAL:
$3.200.00
$3.200.00
. Expert Fees:
.-,.
Attached is the proposed Agreed Order.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $3,200.00 are available in the FY 2005 adopted
budget. Source of funds are Gas Taxes and Impact Fees.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: None.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Approve the Agreed Order as to Parcels 131 A and 131 B; and
2. Approve the expenditure of funds as stated.
PREPARED BY: Heidi F. Ashton, Assistant County Attorney, Office of the County Attorney
,--
Agenda Item No, 16K3
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 8
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Meeting Date
16K3
Recommendation for the Board of County Commissioners to Approve an Agreed Order for
Payment of Engineering Fees in the Amount of $3,200.00 in Connection with Parcels 131 A
and 131B in the Lawsuit Styled Collier County v. Stonebridge Country Club Community
Association, Inc., et aI., Case No. 04.3588-CA (Immokalee Road Project #66042).
5/10/2005 9:00:00 AM
Item Number
Item Summary
Prepared By
Date
Heidi F. Ashton
Assistant County Attorney
4/26/2005 11: 11 :30 AM
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Services Admin.
4/26/2005 2:47 PM
Approved By
Transportations Services
Principal Project Manager
Transportation Engineering and
Construction Management
Date
Eugene Calvert
4/26/20053:19 PM
Approved By
Sharon Newman
Accounting Supervisor
Date
-,
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/26/2005 5:17 PM
Approved By
Kevin Hendricks
Right Of Way Acquisition Manager
Transportation Engineering and
Construction
Date
Transportion Services
4/26/20056:11 PM
Approved By
Lisa Taylor
Management/Budget Analyst
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/27/20058:49 AM
Approved By
David C. Weigel
County Attorney
Date
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
4/28/20059:10 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 7:46 AM
Approved By
Susan Usher
Senior Management/Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 11 :31 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/200512:05 PM
Agenda Item No. 16K3
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of B
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4130/2005 1 :08 PM
Agenda Item No. 16K3
May 10. 2005
Page 4 of 8
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAl.. CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, n..ORIDA
CIVIL ACTION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a
political subdivision of the State of
Florida,
Case No.: 04-3588-CA
Petitioner,
Parcel Nos.: 131A & 131B
vs.
STONEBRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.,
et aI.,
Respondents.
I
AGREED ORDER
---I
THIS CAUSE, having come before the COUlt upon Joint Motion made by Petitioner,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. by and through the undersigned counsel. and Respondent, CVS.
SUCCESSOR TO ECKERD DRUG CORPORATION, by and through its undersigned counsel, for
entry of an Agreed Order, and the Court. being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Respondent, CYS, SUCCESSOR TO ECKERD DRUG
CORPORATION, receive from Petitioner, COllIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, the sum of Three
Thousand Two Hundred Dollars and No/tOO ($3,200.00) for engineering services incurred in
connection with Parcels 131A and 131B~ it is further
ORDERED that Petitioner, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. shall disburse the sum of
Three Thousand Two Hundred Dollars and No/tOO ($3,200.00) to SCHROPP, BUELL &
EU.IGETT TRUST ACCOUNI' c/o Mark P. Buell, Esquire, 3003 West Azeele Street, Suite 100,
Tampa. FL 33609 for the benefit of Respondent. CYS, SUCCESSOR TO ECKERD DRUG
.....,.
CORPORATION.
Agenda Item No. 16K3
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 8
DONE AND ORDERED this _ day of
,2005 in Naples, Collier County, .
Florida.
CIRCUIT COURT runOE
Conformed copies to:
Heidi F. Ashton, Esquire
Mark P. Buell, Esquire
Bookkeeping
Service List
JOINT MOTION
The Parties. by and through their undersigned attorneys. hereby move for entry of the
foregoing Agreed Order as to Parcels J 31 A and 131B.
Dated:
Dated:
@
HEIDI F. ASHTON, ESQUIRE
Florida Bar No.: 966770
COUNTY: ATTORNEY~S OFFICE
Hannon Turner Building
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239) 774-8400 - Telephone
(239) 774-0225 - Facsimile
ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER
MARK P. BUELL, ESQUIRE
Florida Bar No.: 216703
SCHROPP, BUELL & ELLIGETT. P.A.
3003 West AzeeJe Street. Suite 100
Tampa. FL 33609
(813) 874-2600 - Telephone
(813) 874-1760 - Facsimile
A TIORNEY FOR RESPONDENT
Agenda Item No. 16K3
. SERVICE LIST May 10, 2005
. CoUier COUn.ty v. Stonebridge Country Club Community Association, Inc., et ~'t!e 6 of 8
PARCELS 131A & 1318
Color Whee) Paint Mfg. Co., Inc.
d/b/a Color Wheel Paints & Coats
c/o David K. Strube, Registered Agent
2814 Sil ver Star Road
Orlando, FL 32808
Colombo Enterprises of Florida. Inc.
aka Colombo Enterprises,lnc., an
. Ohio corporation
clo John G. Vega, Esq.
JOHN G. VEGA, P.A.
201 8th Street South, Suite 20
Naples, FL 34102
Brendan Hickey
d/b/a Hickey's Restaurant & Pub
2396 Immokalee Road
Naples, FL 34110
United Telephone Company of Florida
c/o Corporation Service Co., Reg. Agent
1201 Hays Street
Tallahassee, FL 3230 1
P.1. Skinney's, Inc.
c/o Jel'aJd R. Pitkin, Registered Agent
801 Anchor Rode Dr., Suite 203
Naples, FL34103
Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation
flkla Mobil Oil Corporation
C/o Ellen J. Neil, Esq.
GAYLORD, MERliN, LUDOVICI,
DlAZ & BAlN
P.O. Box 569
Boca Grande, FL 33921-0569
Westcoast Veterinary HospitaJ P A
c/o Lesli Reiff DVM, Registered Agent
2306 Immokalee Rd.
Naples, FL 34110
.-1
Erikals Cafe, Inc.
c/o Jose E. Callejas, Registered Agent
2374 ImmokaJee Road
Naples. FL 34109
Em.On's Thai Cafe, lne.
c/o Emon Ban-ley, Registered Agent
2364 lmmokalee Rd.
Naples, FL 34110
Naples Health Hut, Inc.
c/o Michael J. Weiley. Registered Agent
98 Burnt Pine Drive
Naples, FL 34119
Naples Business Center, Inc.
dIbIa UPS Store
23381mmokalee Road
Naples, FL 34110
Pino Tile Holdings ILC
2026 Atlantic Blvd.
Pompano Beach, FL 33069
Steve Hamric, Inc.
c/o James Hamric, Registered Agent
2338 lnunokalee Rd., #215
Naples, FL 34110
Robert C. MacDonald DDS, PA
c/o Robert MacDonald, Registered Agent
2388 Immokalee Road
Naples, FL 34110
Naples Computet'S, Inc.
c/o James Siesky, Registered Agent
1000 N. Tamiami Trail, Suite 201
Naples. FL 34102
Cape Cleaners of SW FL, Inc.
c/o Southwest Prof. Services of So. FL., Inc.,
Registered Agel1t
13571 McGregor Blvd" Suite 22
Fort Myers, FL 33919
Agenda Item No. 16K3
SERVICE LIST May 10, 2005
CoUier County v. Stonebridge Country Club Community Association, Inc., et~1!e 7 of 8
, ERA Faust Realty Group
2310 Immokalee Road
Naples, FL 3411.0
Moon International
d/b/a House of Travel '
Address Unknown
Top Pe.rformance Hair Salon, Inc.
c/o Leonard Bernard, Registered Agent
2312 Immokalee Road
Naples, FL 34110
Joey D's Italian Restaurant, Inc.
Address Unknown
Bob and Shirley Enterprises, Inc.
d/b/a House ofTrsvel
c/o Shirley 1. Babbs, Registered Agent
8554 Fairway Bend Drive
Fort Myers, FL 33912
M&M Uniforms, Inc.
c/o Kristine Holton, Registered Agent
1251 Frank Whiteman Blvd.
Naples, FL 34103
. The Gift Tree
2370 ImmokaJee Road.
Naples, FL341 10
Grace M. Stafford
d/b/a All Pets Grooming
Address Unknown
Denmark Imports, Inc.
clo Donald L Andrews, Registered Agent
6391 Scott Lane
Fort Myers, FL 33912
Pro View Home Inspection. Inc.
Raymond Biron, President
2338 Immokalee Road, #321
Naples. F1.. 34] 10
Trieu Trung Trang
d/b/a City Nails
2352 lmmokalee Road
Naples, FL 34110
Bonilla Naples, Inc.
clo Paul Bonilla. Registered Agent
915 West lSlb Street
Hialeah, FL 33010
Havanas Cuban Cafe & Grill
2366 Irnmokalee Road
Naples. FL 34110
Leolaco, Inc.
cia Paul A. Stanford, Jr., Registered Agent
2370 Immokalee Road
Naples, FL 34110
Special K. Fitness, Inc.
d/b/a Curves
c/o Debra Swindennan. Registered Agent
2362 Immokalee Road
Naples, FL 34110
Federal Savings & Loan Insur'dnce Corp. as
Receiver for Sunrise Savings & Loan Assn.
Address Unknown
Floral Encores, Inc.
d/b/a Mid-Life Ventures, Inc.
c/o Deanne M. Blank. Registered Agent
2354 Immokalee Road
Naples. FL ~11O
Collier County. as the Ex-Officio governing
board of the Collier County Water-Sewer Distist
aka CoHier County Water-Sewer District
c/o Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attorney
Harmon Turner Building
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples. FL 34112
Agenda Item No. 16K3
SERVICE LIST May 10, 2005
CoWer County v. Ston.ebridge Country Club Community Association, Inc., et ~?e 8 of 8
Collier County
c/o Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney
Office of the County Attomey
Harmon Turner Building
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Lee Designs u.c
c/o Michael D. Johnston, Registered. Agent
11923 Cypress Links Drive
Fort Myers. FLJ3913
Pavia Ballantine Corporation
POBox 248
Fort Myers. FL 33902-0248
Alan Soares
d/b/a Alan Soares Concrete Plumbing, Inc.
5910 TayJor Road #3
Naples, FL 34109
Sun-Op Greentree Center Corp., a FL corp.
c/o Andrew Service Corporation of Florida
Address Unknown
S.E.W. Studio, Inc.
c/o Rita Decker. Registered Agent
2360 lmmokalee Road
Naples, FL 34110
Grcen Tree Owners' Association, Inc.
c/o John G. Vega, Esq.
JOHN G. VEGA, P.A.
201 8th Street South, Suite 20
Naples. FL 34102
Naples Community Hospital, Inc.
c/o Kevin Cooper, Registered Agent
350 7th Street N.
Naples, FL 34102
-,
First National Bank of Florida, successor
to First National Bank of Naples
900 Goodlette Road North
Naples, FL 34102
A Auto Buyer's Insurance
2390 lmmokalee Road
Naples, FL 34110
Wendy's International, an Ohio corporation
c/o Andrew G. Diaz, Esquire
GA YLORD MERLlN LUDOVICI DIAZ &
BAIN
5001 West Cypress Street
Tampa, FL 33607-3887
Diagnostic Services, Inc.
dlbla OSl Laboratories
c/o Kevin Cooper, Registered Agent
350 7lh Street N.
Naples, FL 34102
First Union National Bank
Address Unknown
Collier County Tax. Collector:
c/o E. Glenn Tucker, Esquire
RHODES TUCKER & GARRETSON
P. O. Box 887
Marco Island. FL 34146
Gates McYey Builders, Inc.
clo Todd E. Gates~ Registered Agent
12810 Tamiami Trail North
Naples, FL 34110
Kash N' Karry Food Stores. Inc.,
a Delaware corporation
clo Corporation Service Company. Reg. Agent
1201 Hays Street
Tallahassee, FL 32301
Agenda Item No. 16K4
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 3
.-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners Approve a
Settlement and Release With Respect to Certain Claims Made by Better
Roads, Inc. in Connection With the Work Under Contract No. 02-3413, i.e.,
Livingston Road Phase III - Pine Ridge Road to Immokalee Road Project
62071
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve a Settlement and Release with respect to certain
claims made by Better Roads, Inc. in connection with the work under Contract No. 02-3413, i.e..
Livingston Road Phase III - Pine Ridge Road to Immokalee Road.
CONSIDERATIONS: On or about March 30, 2005, Better Roads. Inc. ("Better Roads")
submitted a Notice of Claim pursuant to a contractual alternative dispute resolution procedure
under Contract No. 02-3413, i.e., the contract for the work in construction of Livingston Road
Phase III - Pine Ridge Road to lmmokalee Road. The total claim submitted by Better Roads was
$109,665.71. Following negotiation between Better Roads, its counsel, the County and the
Office of the County Attorney, Better Roads has agreed to resolve this claim if the County
waives and discharges its assessment for three (3) days of liquidated damages in the amount of
$9,655.68. Specifically, the key terms of the proposed Settlement and Release are as follows:
1.
Better Roads would waive, release and discharge forever its claim for
$100,010.03 in additional compensation for the placement of water and rip/rap
under Contract No. 02-3413.
~.
2. The County would waive. release and discharge forever its claim for $9.655.68
for three (3) days of liquidated damages on Milestone 1 of the Livingston Road
Phase III - Pine Ridge Road to Immokalee Road Project.
3. Better Roads would agree to provide necessary and contractually required record
drawings/"as built" drawings within twenty (20) calendar days from approval of
the Settlement by the Board of County Commissioners.
4. The County would agree to release Final Payment to Better Roads in advance of
receipt of the record drawings/"as built" drawings.
5. Better Roads would agree that it would be subject to an action for specific
performance in a Collier County court of competent jurisdiction should it fail to
meet the requirement providing the record drawings/"as built" drawings within
the time established by the Settlement and Release.
FISCAL IMPACT: To the extent the Settlement and Release is approved. the sole fiscal
impact to the County would be the waiver or release of a disputed claim for $9,655.68 in
liquidated damages. If the Settlement and Release is not approved, the liquidated damages claim
as well as the $100,010.03 claim for the placement of water and rip/rap under Contract No. 02-
3413 would need to be arbitrated and the parties would be subject to the expenses of the
,,--
,-
Agenda Item No. 16K4
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 3
arbitration. There will be no additional cost to the County by approval of the Settlement and
Release.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: There is no growth management impact associated
with this Executive Summary.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed
Settlement and Release in accordance with the terms outlined above and authorize the Chairman
to sign the Settlement and Release document.
PREPARED BY:
Michael W. Pettit, Chief Assistant County Attorney
OS.PRe.00202!lO
-,
/"""',
2
Agenda Item No, 16K4
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 3
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16K4
Meeting Date
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners Approve a Settlement and
Release With Respect to Certain Claims Made by Better Roads, Inc. in Connection with
the Work Under Contract No. 02-3413, i.e.. Livingston Road Phase III - Pine Ridge Road to
Immokalee Road Project 62071.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Approved By
David C. Weigel
County Attorney
Date
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
4/28/2005 3:30 PM
Approved By
Michael Pettit
Chief Assistant County Attorney
Date
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
4/28/20053:45 PM
Approved By
Lynn R. Thorpe, P.E.
Principal Project Manager
Transportation Engineering and
Construction
Date
Transportion Services
4/28/20053:58 PM
Approved By
Sharon Newman
Accounting Supervisor
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/28/2005 4:21 PM
Approved By
Lisa Taylor
Management/Budget Analyst
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/28/20054:41 PM
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Services Admin.
4/28/2005 5:02 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 2:28 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/2/20054:29 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/2/20055:25 PM
Approved By
James V, Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
5/3/20058:45 AM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 16K5
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
~-,
Recommendation to Approve Settlement in the Lawsuit Entitled Rose Guinane vs. Collier
County Board of Commissioners Filed in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier
County, Florida, Case No. 03-2243-CA- THB, for $15,000.00.
OBJECTIVE: Board of County Commissioners approval of the settlement at mediation prior to
trial, whereupon the County would pay $15,000.00 and the lawsuit and all claims against the
County would be dismissed with prejudice.
CONSIDERATIONS: On June 30, 1999. the plaintiff fell while exiting the Golden Gate branch
of the Collier County Library. At the time of the fall, plaintiff was leaving a door, which had a 1-
1/2 to 2 inch elevation in the door threshold. There was a yellow painted "caution" marking on the
sidewalk of the entrance side but not in the interior side of the door. The door also had a handmade
"Watch Step" sign which was visible from the outside only at the bottom of the door and was meant
for the people coming in and not leaving the building. As a result of her fall, the plaintiff sustained
a fracture of the humeral neck ofthe right shoulder along with a rotator cuff tear. Plaintiff incurred
$5,200.00 in EMS, hospital, ER physician, orthopedic physician and diagnostic costs as well as
physical therapy costs. The "Watch Step" sign was placed there by library personnel since there
had been other people who had stumbled but not fallen at that same location. Subsequent to
plaintiffs fall, the area was changed and the elevation was corrected.
,---
Mediation settlement of $15,000.00 is reasonable and recommended by the County Attorney and
Risk Management Director under the circumstances. The "Watch Step" sign was homemade and in
a location that would not have been readily discernable. The medical costs incurred of $5,200.00
were reasonable and necessary. Her recovery was slower than it should have been due to her pre-
existing conditions. Thus, the $15,000.00 settlement in light of the $5.200.00 medical costs is
reasonable. If this matter went to trial, trial costs for medical and liability experts would range
somewhere between $8,000.00 to $10,000.00. not counting the potential damages award to plaintiff
for her pain and suffering plus medical bills.
FISCAL IMP ACT: The settlement offer recommended by staff amounts to $15.000.00. Funds are
budgeted and available in the Risk Management Property & Casualty Fund No. 516121650.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: There is no growth management impact associated
with this item.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the mediation
settlement proposal of $15,000.00 and authorize the Chairman of the Board of County
Commissioners to execute all necessary documents.
PREPARED BY: William E. Mountford, Assistant County Attorney
.-.'
Agenda Item No. 16K5
May 10,2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16K5
Recommendation to Approve Settlement in the Lawsuit Entitled Rose Guinane VS. Collier
County Board of Commissioners Filed in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier
County. Florida, Case No. 03-2243-CA-THB. for $15.000.00.
Meeting Date 5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Approved By
Jeffrey A. Walker, CPCU, ARM Risk Management Director Date
Administrative Services Risk Management 4/28/2005 2:59 PM
Approved By
William Mountford Assistant County Attorney Date
County Attorney County Attorney Office 4/28/2005 2:59 PM
Approved By
David C. Weigel County Attorney Date
County Attorney County Attorney Office 4/2812005 3:32 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator Administrative Anistant Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 4/2912005 7:57 AM
Approved By
--I
Mark Isackson Budget Analyst Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 5/2/2005 4:49 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski Management & Budget Director Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 5/212005 5:23 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd County Manager Date
Board of County County Manager's Office 512/2005 7:58 PM
Commissioners
~,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 16K6
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 2
,-
Recommendation to Approve Settlement Prior to Trial in the Lawsuit Entitled Nicholas
Marsit, Jr., et al. vs. Collier County in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County,
Florida, Case No. 03-1232-CA for $42,500.00 Plus Mediation Costs.
OBJECTIVE: Board of County Commissioners approval of the settlement during arbitration-
mediation prior to trial, whereupon the County would pay plaintiffs $42,500,00 plus mediation costs
and the lawsuit and all claims against the County would be dismissed with prejudice.
~
CONSIDERATIONS: On September 3. 2001, the 8-year old infant plaintiff fell off of certain
beach-located outfall pipes, which the County had repaired and maintained during and after the
beach renourishment project of 1995-1996. The infant plaintiff sustained a severe laceration of his
right thigh and right big toe area resulting in stitches in the toe area, a strip closure of the wound in
the thigh area and a resultant mycobacterium marinum infection. The infant plaintiff was not only
treated for a period of four months but also was hospitalized and had an intravenous picc line
inserted in is chest area for the antibiotics. He is left now with significant scarring on his right
thigh and right toe area along with some scarring on his chest from the picc line. After the 4-month
recovery period, which was quite painful at various times, the infant has made a good recovery.
The medical bills incurred by the infant plaintiff total $49,574.03. Even after factoring in
comparative negligence on the part of the infant plaintiff and on the supervising parent with the
medical bills incurred, a settlement during arbitration-mediation of $42,500.00 is considered
reasonable. Furthermore, if this case were to proceed to trial, it is estimated that the County's trial
costs for medical and liability experts would range somewhere between $12,500.00 and $18,000.00
alone, in addition to a potentially higher jury trial damages award for pain and suffering and
medical expenses. Therefore, the County Attorney and Risk Management Director opine that
settlement in the sum of $42,500.00 plus mediation costs is reasonable and recommended under all
the circumstances.
FISCAL IMP ACT: The settlement offer recommended by staff amounts to $42,500.00 plus
mediation costs. Funds are budgeted and available in the Risk Management Property & Casualty
Fund No. 516121650.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
with this item.
There is no growth management impact associated
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the settlement
arrived at during arbitration-mediation of payment of $42,500.00 plus mediation costs and authorize
the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute all necessary documents.
PREPARED BY: William E. Mountford, Assistant County Attorney
,..-~
Agenda Item No. 16K6
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number
Item Summary
16K6
Recommendation to Approve a Settlement Prior to Trial in the Lawsuit Entitled Nicholas
Marsit Jr., et al. vs. Collier County in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County,
Florida, Case No, 03.1232-CA for $42,500.00 Plus Mediation Costs.
Meeting Date 5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Approved By
Jeffrey A. Walker, CPCU, ARM Risk Management Director Date
Administrative Services Risk Management 4/28/2005 2:51 PM
Approved By
William Mountford Assistant County Attorney Date
County Attorney County Attorney Office 4/28/2005 2:57 PM
Approved By
David C. Weigel County Attorney Date
County Attorney County Attorney Office 4/28/2005 3:37 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator Administrative Assistant Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 4/29/20057:56 AM
Approved By
-,
Mark Isackson Budget Analyst Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 5/2/20054:47 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski Management & Budget Director Date
County Manager's Office Office of Management & Budget 5/2/2005 5:22 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd County Manager Date
Board of County County Manager's Office 5/2/2005 6:01 PM
Commissioners
,....,..
Agenda Item No. 16K7
May 10,2005
Page 1 of 7
-'.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation for Approval of an Interlocal Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release
between Collier County and the City of Naples in reference to Florida Department of
Administrative Hearings, Case No.04-1048GM and Second District Court of Appeal in
Lakeland, Florida, Case No. 2DCA# 2D05-392.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board approval of an lnterlocal Settlement Agreement and Mutual
Release between Collier County and the City of Naples pursuant to Florida Department of
Administrative Hearings. Case No.04-l 048GM and Second District Court of Appeal in
Lakeland, Florida, Case No. 2DCA# 2D05-392.
CONSIDERATION: Litigation has been ongoing in this matter stemming from the dispute
regarding the City's Growth Management Plan relating to overpasses. The County and the City,
without any of them admitting any liability or fault, desire to settle the dispute and any and all
disputes. The County and the City desire to reduce their settlement to a writing so that it shall be
binding upon them as well as their respective owners, principals, elected officials, officers.
employees, ex-employees. agents, attorneys, representatives, insurers, spouses. successors.
assigns, heirs grantees and affiliates. (Copy of Settlement Agreement is attached hereto as
Exhibit "A"). The following are the terms:
r'
1.
Collier County, as part of its Goodlette-Frank Project from Golden Gate Parkway to
south of Pine Ridge Road, will provide all needed transportation improvements on
Burning Tree Road to add a three-lane section extending 300 feet east of Goodlette -
Frank Road.
The County further agrees to provide funding in the amount of $100.000.00 to assist the
City in the completion ofthe City's Burning Tree Road Project.
The City will withdraw its motion for attorney fees in this case.
Collier County will withdraw its appeal ofthe decision rendered in the case.
2.
3.
4.
FISCAL IMP ACT: A budget amendment is needed to transfer $100.000 from the
Transportation Supported Gas Tax Fund and appropriate in the Golden Gate Parkway Overpass
Project 60006. Source of Funds are Gas Taxes.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT: There is no growth management impact associated with this
executive summary.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the lnterlocal
Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release between Collier County and the City of Naples
pursuant to Florida Department of Administrative Hearings, Case No.04-l048GM and Second
District Court of Appeal in Lakeland, Florida, Case No. 2DCA# 2D05-392 and authorize the
Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute the lnterlocal Settlement
Agreement and Mutual Release and approve the necessary budget amendment.
Prepared by Jacqueline Williams Hubbard, Assistant County Attorney
,,-..
Agenda Item No. 16K7
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of7
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Meeting Date
16K7
Recommendation for Approval of an Inter local Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release
between Collier County and the City of Naples in reference to Florida Department of
Administrative Hearings. Case No.04-1048GM and Second District Court of Appeal in
Lakeland. Florida, Case No. 2DCA# 2005-392,
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Item Number
Item Summary
Approved By
Sharon Newman
Accounting Supervisor
Date
Transportion Services
Transportation Administration
4/28/2005 2:32 PM
Approved By
David C. Weigel
County Attorney
Date
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
4/28/20053:40 PM
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/20057:54 AM
Approved By
Susan Usher
Senior Management/Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/20059:19 AM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/2005 11 :48 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
4/30/200512:21 PM
Agenda Item No. 16K7
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 7
INTER.LOCAL SEITLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE BETWEEN
COLLIER COUNTY WITH THE CITY OF NAPLES
lHIS SEITLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MVTIJAL RELEASE (hereinafter referred
to as the "Agreement and Release") is entered into and made on the date when it has been
executed by the last of the parties to sign it, by and between Comer County (hereinafter refened
to as "the COWlty"), a political subdivision of the State of Florida and the City of Naples, a
Florida municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "the City").
WITNESSE T H:
WHEREAS, the County filed a Petition for formal administrative hearing with the
Florida Department of Administrative Hearings. Case No.04-1048GM, alleging that the City is
not in compliance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 163, (thereupon the "Case"); and
WHEREAS, the County has also filed an appeal with the Second District Court of
Appeal in Lakeland, Florida, Case No. 2DCA# 2005-392 in said Case; and,
WHEREAS, the County and the City, without any of them admitting any liability or
fault, desire to settle the dispute and any and all disputes or claims that arise from, relate or refer
in any way. whether directly or indirectly, to the Case; and,
WHEREAS, the County and the City desire to reduce their settlement to a writing so that
it shall be binding upon them as well as their respective owners, principals, elected officials,
officers, employees, ex-cmployees, agents, attorneys, representatives, insurers, spouses,
successors, assigns. heirs grantees and affiliates.
NOW, THEREFORE. in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and
consideration set forth in this Agreement and Release, and with the intent to be legally bound,
the County and the City agree as follows:
Pale 1
Settlement AlI"eement & Release
Agenda Item No. 16K7
May 10. 2005
Page4of7
1. Collier County, as part of its Ooodlette-Franlc Project from Golden Gate Parkway
to south of Pine Ridge Road. will provide all needed transportation improvements on Burning
Tree Road to add a three-lane section extending 300 feet cast of Ooodleue - Frank Road.
2. The County further agrees to provide funding in the amount of $100,000.00 to
assist the City in the completion of the City's Burning Tree Road Project. This funding will be
paid to the City within 15 days after the Board of County Commissioners approves the
agreement.
3. The City will withdraw its motion for attorney fees in this Case.
4. Collier County will dismiss its appeal of the decision rendered in the Case.
5. In consideration of the resolution of this dispute, and for other good and valuable
consideration as enumerated in this Agreement, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby
-1
acknowledged, the County and the City. on behalf of 1hemselves. as well as on behalf of their
attorneys, agents, representatives, and assigns, hereby expressly release and forever discharge
among themselves and each other, as well as their officers. employees, ex-employees, agents,
attorneys, representatives, successors, assigns, insurers and affiliates from any and all claims.
demands. causes of actions, damages, costs, attorney's fees, expenses and obligations of any kind
or nature whatsoever that they have asserted Of could have asserted against any other of them
that arise from or relate to or fefer to in any way to the Case, whether directly or indirectly, with
the express exception of an action to enforce this Agreement and/or the terms contained herein.
6. The County and the City acknowledge and agree that this Agreement and Release
is intended to and shall be binding upon their respective owners. principals, officials, officers,
employees, ex-employees, agents, attorneys, representatives, insurers, successors. assigns,
spouses, heirs and affiliates.
,,""""'"'"
2
Page 3
Settlement Agreement It Release
Agenda Item No. 16K7
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 7
7. The COtmty and the City recognize and acknowledge that this Agreement and
Release memorializes and states a settlemcnt of disputed claims and nothing in this Agreement
and Release shall be construed to be an admission of any kind, whether of fault, liability, or of a
particular policy or procedure. on the part of the County or the City.
8. The County and the City acknowledge and agree that this Agreement and Release
is the product of mutual negotiation and no doubtful or ambiguous language or provision in this
Agreement and Release is to be construed against any party based upon f:l claim that the party
drafted the ambiguous provision or language or that the party was intended to be benefited by the
ambiguous provision or language.
9. This Agreement and Release may be amended only by a written instrument
specifically referring to this Agreement and Release and executed with the same formalities as
this Agreement and Release.
10. In the event of an alleged breach of this Agreement and Release, the County and
the City agree that all underlying causes of action or claims of the County and the City have been
mutually extinguished, among and between each of them, by this Agreement and. Release and
that the sole remedy for breach of this Agreement and Mutual Release shall be for specific
performance of its terms and conditions; or for any damages arising from the breach. In this
regard, the County and the City furthcr agree that the sole venue for any such action shall be in
the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, or, if that Court refuses to accept jurisdiction
thereover, a Court of competent jurisdiction.
11. The laws of the State of Florida shall govern this Agreement and Release.
12. If any action or proceeding is commenced with regard to the subject matter of this
Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, then the prevailing party in such action or
3
PSle 4
Settlement Agreement &: Release
Agenda Item No. 16K7
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of7
proceeding shall be entitled to have its reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in said
action or proceeding promptly reimbursed by the non-prevailing party.
13. The parties further agree that time is of the essence in all respects regarding this
Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release.
14. The parties agree that this Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release and any and
all other documents in connection with the settlement of this matter may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an oriainal but all of which taken together shall
constitute but one and the same instrument. Furthermore, the parties agree that a facsimile copy
of a party's signature shall be deemed the equivalent of an original.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the City have signed and sealed this
Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release as set forth below:
.....,
CITY OF NAPLES;
Witnesses:
By:
BILL BARNETI, Mayor
(Signature)
(Print)
(8 ignature)
(print)
Date:
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Robert G. Menzies, Esquire
4
P8&e S
Settlement Agree.eat & Release
COLLIER COUNTY:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk of
Courts of Collier County, Florida
By:
Deputy Clerk
Date:
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Jacqueline Williams Hubbard
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item No. 16K7
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 7
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Date:
5
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Agenda Item No. 17A
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 43
.-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
V A-2005-AR-6983; Daniel and Gail Barthel, as agent and owners requesting an after-the-
fact variance from Section 2.07.00 and Section 4.02.22 of the Land Development Code
(LDC) for relief from the required front yard of 25 feet to allow a 3.3-foot front setback
and from the required side yard of 5 feet to a setback of 1.2 feet to accommodate a shade
trellis over a parking area, as shown on the survey. The subject property is described as
Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Block A, Lot 2, Goodland Isles, Collier
County, Florida, Plat Book 6, page 7.
OBJECTIVE:
Staff is requesting that the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) review staffs findings and
recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission
(CCPC) regarding the above referenced Variance petition and render a decision pursuant to
Section 8.04.00 of the LDC.
CONSIDERATIONS:
,-
The applicant is requesting a variance from both the required front and side yards in the
Residential Single Family-Goodland Overlay (RSF-4-GZO) zoning district from the minimum
required 25 foot front setback and the minimum required 5 foot side setback, to allow a shade
trellis constructed in 2001 to encroach to within 3.3 feet of the property line in the front and 1.2
feet to the property line in the side yard. The amount of variance requested is 21.7 feet in the
front and 3.8 feet on the side.
The subject property, located at 507 Goodland Drive West in Goodland, is waterfront property
that is bordered on the north and south by single-family homes, and on the east by a motel. The
homeowner purchased the historic home and has been renovating the structure and making other
improvements to the property. One of these improvements was to remove a one-car carport, and
replace it with the subject trellis, which he thought was a legal structure.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval ofthis petition will have no fiscal impact on Collier County.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
Approval of this variance will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management
Plan (GMP), therefore there is no GMP impact associated with the variance request.
,-----
Page1of3
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 43
,.-.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
There are no environmental issues associated with this petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
The EAC did not review this petition because the EAC does not normally hear variance petitions.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) must utilize 8 criteria in considering a variance petition
(see the professional planning staff analysis of the petition using the relevant criteria set forth in
the Land Development Code). This analysis appears on pages 5 through 7 of the Staff Report
and is summarized below.
Staffs analysis of the criteria found that there was support for the request in the analysis of
seven of the eight criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03:
The variance proposal must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan (see professional
planning staff analysis of petition using relevant plan objectives, policies, and provisions of the
Land Use Designation Description Section). This analysis appears under the heading titled
___. "Growth Management Plan Consistency" of the Staff Report on page five.
It must be understood that the Staff Report and Executive Summary are part of the picture.
There will be evidence presented by the petitioner and members of the public at the hearing on
this item that the Board must also take into consideration especially as it relates to growth
management plan consistency and the 8 standards for consideration for the variance.
The BZA may impose reasonable stipulations, safeguards, or restrictions upon the variance.
These stipulations, restrictions or safeguards include those necessary to protect adjacent or
nearby properties from any adverse impacts of the variance. A simple majority is required to
approve a variance.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
This petition was heard at the April 7, 2005 CCPC meeting. The Commission motioned to
forward petition V A-2004-AR-6983 with a recommendation of APPROVAL, subject to a
revision to the conditions recommended by staff. A revision to the conditions would remove the
stipulation that the structure could only remain as it exists today, and would permit repairs to the
structure to ensure the safety and integrity of the trellis over time. The motion passed
unanimously 9-0. Because staff has not received any letters of objection to the proposed
variance, this petition has been placed on the Summary Agenda.
"-"
Page 2 of3
..-------,.----- - ,-.- -
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 43
.",-..
SUMMARY:
Staff has analyzed the guidelines associated with the variance request. and has detennined that
there is land-related hardship associated with this variance. Ameliorating factors may include:
the aesthetic design of the trellis, which is an attractive addition to both the site and the
neighborhood and the depth of right-of-way between the paved road and the property line.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staffhas recommended APPROVAL, subject to the following condition:
1. The variance is limited to a 1.2-foot setback from the side property line, and a 3.3-foot
setback from the front property line, as shown on the survey done by Dennis M. Porte 11 a,
Sr.. on May 17, 1999.
2. The variance is limited to the location of the structure as depicted on the survey provided.
This provision would allow minor repairs or complete replacement of the trellis if
destroyed by acts of nature or man.
PREPARED BY:
i~~
Heidi K. Williams. Principal Planner
Department of Zoning & Land Development Review
,;-
Page 3 of 3
Item Number
Item Summary
Meeting Date
Agenda Item No, 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 43
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
17A
This Item requires that all participants be swam In and ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. VA-2005-AR.6B83; Daniel and Gail Barthel. es egent and owners
requesting an alter-the-fact vanance from Section 2.07.00 and Section 4.02.22 of the Land
Daveiopment Code (LDC) for relief trom tha required front yard of 25 teet to allow a 3.3-
toot front setback and from the reqUired side yard of 5 feet to a setback of 1.2 feet to
accommodate a ."ade trellis over a parking area, as shown on the .urvey. The sUbJec1
property is described as Sec1lon 16, Township 52 Soull" Range 27 East, Block A, Lo12,
Goodland Isles, Collier Counly. Florida, Pial Book 6. page 7.
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Heidi William>
Principal Pllnner
4/25/2005 9:52:53 AM
Prepared By
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Dete
Zoning & Land Oevelopment Review
Zoning & Land Development Diractor
O.te
Approved By
Su..n Murray, Ale?
Community DevelDpment &
Environmental Servicell
Zoning & Land Development Review
4126/2005 11 :01 AM
ConsUnee A. Johnson
O.te
Approved By
Community De'lelopmllnt &
Environmental ServlclU
Operations Analyat
Community Oevfllopn1ttnt &
Environmental Services Admin.
4126/2005 11 :04 AM
Det.
Approved By
Sandra Lei
Community Development &
Environmental Servicee
Executive SeereUlry
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
412612005 11 :08 AM
Chief Planner
Dlte
Approved By
_.t'
Ray Bellowl
Community DevelDpment &
Environmental ServicllD
Approved By
Zoning & Land Development Review
4/26/2005 11 :26 AM
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Oevelopment &
Environmental Service.
Community Development &
Environment.' Servloe. Adrninvtrator
Dete
Community Development &
Environment;ll Service. Admin,
412612005 1 :53 PM
Assistant County Attomey
Date
Approved By
Plltnck G. White
County Attorney
county Attorney om..
4/2811005 2:40 PM
OMS Coordln.tor
Adminiatr.tive A.sistant
O.te
Approved By
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/28/20054:41 PM
Mark Isack&on
Budget An.lyet
OIte
Approved By
County MlInagBr's Office
Office of Mllnug.tnllnt & Budget
5/2/20056:17 PM
Michael Smykowakl
Management & Budget Director
Date
Approved By
County Manager'. Office
Office of Mpnagement & Budget
5/3/2005 1 :21 PM
Jarn.>> V, Mudd
County Manlger
Date
Approved By
Board or County
Comml...loners
County Manager'>> Office
513/2005 3:53 PM
AG~i_1~\b~~
Page 5 of 43
"
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COlviMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEARING DATE: APRIL 7, 2005
SUBJECT: PETITION V A-2005-AR-6983. BARTIIEL TRELLIS
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
OWNER: Daniel and Gail Barthel
507 Goodland Drive West
Goodland, FL 34140
AGENT: N/A
REOUESTED ACTION:
The applicant is requesting an after-the-fact variance in the Residential Single Family-Goodland
Overlay zoning district (RSF-4-GZO) from the minimum reqUired 25-foot front yard setback, and the
minimum required 5-foot side yard setback, to allow a 3.3-foot front yard setback and a 1.2-foot side
yard setback for a shade trellis that accommodates two parking spaces and replaced a carport. The
amount of variance requested is 21.7 feet in the front and 3.8 feet on the side.
GEOGRAPmc LOCATION:
The subject parcel is located at 507 Goodland Drive West, further described as the Goodland Isles.
. Block A. Lot 2 in Section 18. Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (See
location map on the following page.)
PURPOSE/DESCRlPTION OF PROJECT:
As depicted on the attached survey. the applicant seeks a variance to allow for the continued use of an
accessory shade trellis to legally replace a carport on the single-family residential sjte. The applicant
purchased the home and has made several improvements to the property. following all applicable
processes. In this case. the applicant was mistakenly under the impression that the Goodland Overlay
zoning district allowed the replacement of existing non-conforming structures. 1ms petition arises
from a code enforcement case that was brought against the applicant after the construction of the shade
trellis was completed. The next stage of coming into compliance will require the applicant to obtain
construction permits, and pay all applicable fees. The trellis provides shade, but is slatted to allow rain
to pass through.
VA-2005-AR-6983 April 7, 2005 ccpe Meeting Page 1 of 8
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005 .
Page 6 of 43 .:'\ .
\
.
\
.\
"..,.~CIft1'UtlTI
.",,'
--,
....- /
-
......,...
......
\
I
Ii
i!
I!
I
I
\
\
I::-
~/
~
a..
<(
2:
IJJ
i-
-
CJ)
..,
.
0-
00
I
II:
<
I
on
o
o
...
I
<
>-
'"
z
o
t=
l-
....
Q..
a..'
<(
2:
Z
o
-
~
U
o
-J
.)
CA._ ..._ I.EGEND _-HA__ "/I'.__r
· - ..... ....-.r c. 0CIIt ...... "'lW' CP tta .,. . ~ " .v
.. . _ta m _ CHlM) .,.... __ __ __) .. . ___ .
-- . PDICI' a. - ..... ... NM' _ HAL . T. .. _ IIC1alI
o -.......... CIIl ~ ClCIlICIEIr........... CIfI _ ....... . . --..
j:-- - - .. IDI ..... - -- , _ "-'T . _ -._
- .... .. ...... CCM: - ..... PC . ,-",. CIIW.f.,. T . .....
--_~_ D._ ___--._ .__-..,.
o -1lT-...It--.; IW__...- l'I-_IF_. . lmI_~_
-T--=-.'frl :::~ ....----.IAe_ li;:::~"",
J : =DCICIIlID -r: =-=: .:: : =:: ~'"' ~ : =: UllMPr
""" . ~11 rarr . EAIBBff 11Ift - ~ IIlCU ., _ WlXIO
':: : =z. :: : ~ I\AIlIl UVA_ '1:: ;::....,~_"r"'" -- ..: : =:.....___
M.DI . "aNt 1M - ." .. "*' _ I'AWIIIaIT .
au.1I.OCIC ...::=:. ~:=CII'"
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
\
\
\
~
~
f'i
~
~
\.
~1.
t~
~\\
""'11
IJ
\
LOT 1
BLOCK "A"
\
LOT 3
BLOCK "A-
'<6
\'t
,f,
\~
\%
.~
O"l
0"
-;:0
-
~
\
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF' COWER)
VA.~83
P1lOIEC1" faOO4111lO53
DATB: ZI2JIl5
BUDI WlLLlAMS
I. 0.,'';1. M. Portello. Sr., a R"9I.t...... land SurYtl)'Ql" In tIl. State 0' Florida, h.-.by certify
that tIl. for.vcM9 plot rep.....t. a t1Ur"")' of the following dncribed pr""'"
lOT 2. BlOCK "A", GOllDlANO ISLE S. a. recorded In Plat Book 6. Pave 7
of 111. Public R.cords of Colli.. County, FlortdCl. 'That 0 t1Urwy 0' the abo.... deecrlbed property wa. mad. und.. my '.
direction and meet. the Minimum T.chnlcal Standards a. P" Chapter 61G17-11 Florida Admlnletratl.. Cod.. pu,..,ant to
Section 472.027, florida Stowt... 'There ore no "'.11'. encroachment. other than Mown. no ea..nent. or clalml Df
.D......"ltI of whIch ... hove knowl"'ge. No tilt. March ha. been made by th.......,.,... No attempt hD. bMll mad. to
10cDt. foot... beneath tile ..rfac..
Street Addr... Ie 507 GoodIond WtItIt Crt.., Nopl... Fl.
Bearlngl con'orm to Plot Book
E1.vaUon. are N.G. V.D. l"\lf1 In from Bioi 872-4979-B 'Tltla
Property ill In Flood Zone . AE:'
l00-l'tIO" flood .......tlon I. 11.0 01 per F.l.IUI. panel
120067 0817 0, ~.""' ""ne J, 1988
".,2 .
0RIGtW. SUIM:Y llQt: IIey 17, 1 nil
NOTlS ole RIY'ISlONS
BOUNDARY SURVIY
DAN 8AR'1'HEL
PORTBlU " ASSOClATIlS. LLC WI?
2384 IJNWOOD AVE. NAPLD. Fl. 341'..
SCotU: ,'. 20' ~1E: .......... I. 2110,1
(2311) 775-1511
I'IVIWIID rOR
~4C~a~
Cennhl M. Porttllla. Sr. 14504
Not valid unle. .igned and sealed
with emb.....d leal.
Agenda Item No. 17 A
005
~ f43
a ;1 ~ ~ $~
I .;i~l~ ~ ;i~
Ill!h :.-:is;
lip ~ ~ ~: ~'
;1 ~~i~~ia
ipJ~~I~
!ilhU"~ .
Ilh --.
~ a
w........... 0
<(N I: f
..-
W q-
w........... Z--.J
<(.- OW ~ Ii I
.- N'-" !p
W
z--.J II Ii i
OW !r
N"-'" it!
:p
"". J ~
._',
5
f
iii.... Wf'..Iir"lO-.: .....c.... u
lItw4I(J I .o-C'r:''f n
..,.... .".......: \I
lO-EO fboo.l-f' &.of
11:-" .....-tl ..I
...... ....h... I'
,."'l.' W'fl-oof,/1
...._ .."J..et .,.,.,"r..
,.,~ ........... ,..:~, ,.
...." ............. ...;."'1 ,\
~:r.. ~;-~ '!~~ ~:
~ .......~"'I ""..II..... II
M-if. IU"fCo-ot'CI fI..tl~11 ~"
"....,.. f,,"w-" ....n.fl ..
.,... t....... (I.'~~MI ~ I
.......f!.. '1!';~ '~.,:~ :
u."c' ~..c.~ tt......u I
,...... 'j
""' tl .. I~ IDIflQ ...... ~"'" =
1k1...>>\.........loIt.1.'~1
:031IM.\IIIIflII
..--..----.-
.,.,.._",.,. i I
\ I .......ltlt...
II on_ --
I::'. &
!/ ~ l' ......
€;
If
,
i
I
i
I
i
\
I
I
~
_'" .-w.:;.'~O'N LJoIIt5
"...
"A,mO'.J =,60Iato~:)JD JO ;)lJ01'JI,f 6unou6,.ep I:JJnOI -'lUnoo
IO!~UO ."-n ./D ado" il.lU!qoqoJd IDllI!6olO.01.p~~/"JOl.IH 'l..U.
l'
~
~ ........
I'll
ttl
'Ilill
IIIGD
----------~3H10---------~NINOZ :NOISI^3(:j lS\fl
. ..............
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 43
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
SURROUNDING:
North:
East:
South:
West:
Single-family residence, zoned RSF-4-GZO
Motel, zoned C-4-GZO
Single-family residence, zoned RSF-4-GZO
Single-family residence, zoned VR-GZO
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
The subject property is located in the Urban Coastal Fringe subdistrict of the Urban designation of the
Future Land Use Map of the GMP.
The Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict land use category is described in the GMP as follows:
The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Conservation
Designated Area and the Urban Designated Area. It includes that area south of US 41 between
the City of Naples and Collier-Seminole State Park, including Marco Island and comprises
approximately 18,000 acres and 15% of the Urban Mixed Use District. In order to facilitate
hurricane evacuation and to protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation
Designated Area, residential densities shall be limited to a maximum of 4 dwelling units per
acre, except as allowed in the Density Rating System to exceed 4 units per acre through
provision of Affordable Housing and Transfer of Development Rights, and except as provided
in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. New rezones to permit mobile
home development within this Subdistrict are prohibited. Rezones are recommended to be in
the form of a Planned Unit Development The Marco Island Master Plan shall provide for
density, intensity, siting criteria and specific standards for land use districts encompassed by
the Marco Island Master Plan but outside the incorporated area of Marco Island.
The GMP does not address individual variance requests; it focuses on the larger issue of the actual use.
As previously noted, the subject petition seeks a variance to allow a 3.3-foot front yard setback and a
1.2-foot side yard setback for a shade trellis over the residential parking area, which is an authorized
use in this land use designation, therefore,.the actual use is consistent with the Future Land Use Map.
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that the proposed use for the subject site is consistent
with the Future Land Use Element, although the variance request is not specifically addressed.
ANALYSIS:
Section 9.04.00 of the Land Development Code grants the authority to the Board of Zoning Appeals to
grant variances. The Planning Commission is advisory to the BZA and utilizes the provisions of
Section 9.04.03.A through 9.04.03.a which are general guidelines to be used to assist the Commission
in making a determination. Staff has analyzed this petition and offers the responses to the items in
Section 9.04.03 as follows:
a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the locationt
size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved?
Yes. The subject site was platted prior to its being zoned RSF-4. As a result. the lot is smaller in
area and in lot width than a standard conforming RSF-4Iot of record. The minimum lot width of
VA.2005-AR-6983 Aprfl7. 2005 CCPC Meeting Page 5 of 8
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 43
a conforming RSF-4 lot is 70 feet, while the subject site is only SO feet wide. Tbe subject
property is developed with a single-family home. The driveway is in place on the south side of
the property due to the location of the septic field on the northeast portion of the site. The owner
has no alternative location for the driveway.
b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the
applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which is the subject of the
variance request?
Yes. The subject property is a small platted lot of record that is developed with one single-
family residence. This residence is connected to a septic system that uses much of the front yard
for its drain field. The driveway is located in the only location possible due to the drain field.
The pre-existing carport, which was removed by the current owner, also encroached into the
required yard setbacks. This structure was unsightly and was replaced by the applicant. The
replacement structure became the subject of the variance request after being cited by Collier
County Code Enforcement.
c.
Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and
undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant?
'-'I
Yes. The applicant already removed the original carport that provided shade for vehicles. He
has incurred great expense replacing that dilapidated non-conforming structure with an attractive
alternative. If this variance is denied, he will be required to remove the shade trellis, and will be
unable to replace it with anything due to the prescribed location of the driveway and the smaller
lot width.
d.
Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health,
safety and welfare?
Yes. This petition is pursuant to a code violation case for a previously built structure. The
variance being requested is based on a survey provided by the applicant.
The variance is the minimum variance to allow a reasonable use of this structure (as it is shown
on the site plan) to become a conforming structure. Approval of the variance should not have a
negative impact upon the standards of health, safety and welfare.
e. Will granting the variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by
these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district?
No. The Goodland area is a long-standing community in Collier County. It has developed from
its roots as a fishing village into the unique town that exists today. Goodland was platted with
smaller lots than what is normally approved today. Over time many structures have been placed
on these lots that do not meet the standards established by the Land Development Code. The
applicant was under the impression that due to the many "grandfathered" non~conforming
structures in the area, that his would be acceptable as well. The applicant would like to be
permitted to have a structure on his site that is equivalent to the structures around him.
VA-2005-AR-6983 April 7, 2005 CCPC Meeting Plge 6 of 8
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 43
f. Will granting the variance be in harmony. with the general intent and purpose of this Land
Development Code, and Dot be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare?
Yes. The owner has built an attractive shade trellis that is in harmony with. the intention of
redevelopment efforts for the GoodIand area. Staff has analyzed the guidelines associated with
the variance request, and has detemtined that there are ameliorating factors that warrant approval
of this petition. The intention of the applicant was to improve the look of the property, while
providing a functional two-car shaded area. There is some confusion on what is allowed by the
Goodland Overlay. The citizens who were involved in the process of developing the 'GZO'
Overlay discussed many possible aspects to include in the regulations. Apparently, the owner
was under the impression that existing non-confonning structures were allowed to be replaced.
This is the premise under which the applicant constructed the shade trellis. Staff feels that the
trellis, as constructed, does not impede neighbors' views. The property to the south, which is
arguably the most affected, has a driveway on the opposite side of the site. Additionally, there is
23 feet from the pavement of the street to the property line. Approval of the variance should not
have a negative effect upon the neighborhood as a whole, and would not be detrimental to the
public welfare.
g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and
objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.?
No. However, between the trellis and the adjacent property on the south side, the applicant
maintains flowering shrubs. There is a chain-link fence on the neighbor's property as well.
In staifs-epinioo,the--shmbbery-and .the-fence'work-as-1m- efiective-buffer-md--adequ1!ltely-address------
compatibility .
h. Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan?
Approval of this variance petition will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth
Management Plan.
EAC RECOMMENDATION:
The Environmental Advisory Council does not normally hear variance petitions, and did not hear this
variance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission recommend approval of Petition V A-
2005-AR-6983 to the Board of Zoning Appeals, subject to the following conditions:
1. The variance is limited to a 1.2.foot setback from the side property line, and a 3.3-foot setback
from the front property line, as shown on the survey done by Dennis M. Portella, Sr., on May 17,
1999.
2. The variance is limited to the existing structure, as built. The destruction of the shade trellis in
any way would rescind the variance and require the owner to comply with the setbacks as
prescribed by the Land Development Code at that time.
VA-2005-AR-6983 April 7, 2005 CCPC MeetIng Page 7 of 8
l'
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 12 of 43
PREPARED BY:
~~'-
HEIDI K. WILLIAMS, PRlNCIP AL PLANNER
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
3!Ilf!06
DATE
REVIEWED BY:
d4?-40$
DA '
OWS, ZONING MANAGER
DEPAR NT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
~~~:3
D:ATE
APPROVED BY:
ilf
RUSSELL A. BUDD, CHAIRMAN
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the May 10, 2005 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
VA.2005-AR-6983 April 7, 2005 CCPC Meeting Page 9 of9
"~ \
Agenda Item' No. 17 A
May 10, 2005..
. Page 13 of 43
VARIANCE PETITION
(V ARlANCE FROM SETBACK (8) REQUIRED FOR A f' ARnCULA,R ZONING DISTRIq)
Petition No.
Commission District:
. . ,V A-2005-AR-6983
Date Petition Received: _ PROJECT #2004110053
DATE: 212/05
PI As. ed" . HEIDI WILLIAMS
. anner SIgn : ~
ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF
. - .1I~.~ ". '1'-
GENERAL INFORMATION:
~ i
Petitioner's Name; Daniel J & Gail MBarthel
Petitioner's Address: 507 Goodland Drive West.
Goodland, Florida Telephone: 389-5610
Pax#:
E-Mail Address:danbarthel@hotmai1.com
.~ ; ,.:- ~: ~;, . ..
Agent's Name: None
~'.. . .r-,
Agent'sAddress: .
Telephone:
Fax#: .
E-Mail Address:
,..:. ->. .:, '~"''':'''":"..\... ....
. * Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and
ensure that you are in complia~ce with these regulations. : ;.
COLLIER. COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING SERVICES/CURRENT PLANNING
2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE - NAPLES,FL 34104
PHONE (941) 403-24001FAX (941) 643-6968
l ~.
Page 1 ~ Revised 4/03
Complete the following for all Association(s)affjliated with this petition. (Provide addition.a!
sheets ifnec.essar):') . . . . -
).
;'.,: '.~. t.?~. .,,:
~~~. i.
Agenda Item No. 17 A
. May 10, 2005"
Page 14 of 43
Name of Homeowner Association:
Mailing Address
City
State _ Zip
Name of Homeowner Association:
Mailing Address
City
State ~ Zip
Name of Homeqwner Association: Goodland Civic Association. Goodlandpreser-vation '.'
Coalition
Mailing Address
City
State _ Zip'
Name of Master Association:
Mailing Address
City
Sta,t~ ~ Zil", '.'
. . ..t.... I
. Name of Civic Association: Goodland Civic Association, Goodland Preservation Coalition
Mailing Address
. City.
Sta,te _ Zip
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
'. .
Legal Description of Subject Property:
Subdivision: 1809 Lot 2 Bloc~ A Goodland Isles
Section 18 Twp. 52 Range 27 Property 1.D. # 46370080002
Metes .& Bounds Description:
~. . ..
Address 'of Subject Property: 507 Goodland Drive West. Goodland Florida 34140
(If different from Petitioner's address) ,
Current Zoning and Land u~e qf Subject Parcel: RSF-4 -&z.o .
.." ',' . ': /",
'.
Adjacent Zoning & Lan(i Use:
. WNING
N RSF-4 -&z..o
SRSF-4 -&zo
WVR-G-Zo
'E G-a-&4- &rZo
Home
Home
Home
Motel
J)
Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property:
Front: 25
Comer Lot: No
Side: 5
Waterfront Lot: Yes
Rear: 20
LAND USE
. --_. ---. ---....-----
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May..W, 2005
Page 150f 43
:,"
).
'"
J.. " : ," ,~";, ~::,
Nature of Petition
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, ,2005
Page 1Q of 43
Provide a detalledexplanation of the request including 'what structures are existing and
what is proposed; the. amount of encroachment proposed using numb'ers, i.e. r~duce ..,
front.setbac~ from 25' to 18'; when property o~~r purchased property; when existing
principal structure was built (include building permit number (5) if possible); why
encroachment is necessary; how, exi~ting encroachment came to be; etc.
,The main structure on this lot was built in 1910 by Captain Bill Collier, This informlltion is
supplied as oral history by Cappy Kirk. Thestructui'e was originally located at the. Doxie Clam
factory on Marco Island, and, then served as a guest cottage for the Marq<) Inn. Th~ structure.,
was moved to Goodland in the 1960's where it first appears on the Property Appra.;,sers recor4,., '
The structUre was restored in 2000-~001 by the present owners.
Although the lot is zoned RSF~4,the lot is one of the few located along Goodlan4DriveWest' '
that is only SO" not 70 feet in width, which severely limits options for placing a shaded parking
area.
This request is to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 3.3 feet and the side setback from 5
feet to. 1.2 foot to accommodate a shade trellis over a parking area. This trellis replace4 lUl ,
existing caroort which waS removed to allow parking :for two cars~ This request repres~tfan..; . ..
increase ofS.7 feet on the'front and 3.8 feet on the side over the prior parking cover.
, The trellis is located in the only possible location possible due to the location of the pnn~ipal'
structure and the septic drain field.
The trellis is of wood construction with an open cover consisting of2x3's liUld alternating'oPeIl
, space. ,It is supported by 6yx6 timbers.. The trellis matches the spirit of both ~ principal
s~cture and of adjacent neighborhood stru~tures.' , ' .
The, affected neighbor on the side where the reduction of the setback from $', to I! has
expressed no objection to the granting of the variance. His letter is attached. The boardQf tl1e, .'~
Goodland Civic Association has voiced no objection to the structure. '. ,. .
Please note that staff and the Collier County Planning Commission sh,.Jl b~ gUid~, ill .;. '
their recommendation to the Board of zoning Appeals, and that the Board ofzonfug,
appeais shall be guided in its determination to' approve or deny a variance petition by tJ1e . ,
below listed' criteria (1-8). (please address this criteria us~ng addi<<on~t, ,pages if'
necessary.)'
1. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to
the location, size andch.aracteristics, of the land, structure, 9r buDding
involved. ' .
, -
Due to the size of the lot (50xlOO) and the location ofilie septic 'drain field, the only
possible location to park vehicles is the.proposed location. Thus the setback vartangesa,re
," -'., .,' . ( :-i~: )".' .'
\...
..:.
Agenda Item No. 17 A
. " r\.1i3Y10,200S
, 'Page 17of43
required as a matter of necessity, not convenience. Side parking is not possible because of
the placement of the main structure.
2. Are there special conditions and circumstances which' do n~t result from the
action of the,applicant, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property
which is the subject of the variance request.
Existing aluminum parking cover was in poor shape, an eyesore, and could only' 1, ,:'.' " "
. accommodate one vehicle. The ,lot is also one of the few along Goodland Drive West which
is only 50 feet wide, rather than 70, which severely limit options for placement of a s~aded
parking area. , ' '
3. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary
and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant.
The owner has no other option for covered parkmg to protect the vehicles from th~",
sun. Structures grandfathered in by the overllllY are equally non-confonnant to the literal
interpretation of the zoning code. ' ,
'1...:;[.
4, Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possibl~ the
reasonable use of . the land, building or structure and which pro~ote standard,s of
health, safety or welfare,"
Yes.
. . >~ ~.', ~(..c
5. Wm granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special mivileg~"
that is denied by these zoning regulations to other l~nds, buildings, or stnicturC$ in
the same zoning district.
Setback problems are common in Goodland and in many circumstances have been
grandfathered in under the Goodland Overlay which legalized all eXlstin2 structures
including the original ,carport. For example, the Village rim located across the street from
the subject property has an entry Structure which encroaehes the complete front setback:'" " "
This structure existed before the overlay, and has been grandfathered. There are many other
examples in Goodland Please view the attached ~ of Goodland. The ~olored 19ts, a~ ~. ,
minimum"have setback issues which were grandfathered.. Variances have also been ;
granted for recent new construction in which case the main structure is located at least 10- '
15 feet forward into the yard requirement.
I .
6, Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose oftltis zoning
code, and not be'inj~rious to the neighbOI:'hood, or otherwise detrimental ,to die public'";'
welfare. " , . "
The trellis as constiucted is esthetically pleasing and comp~imen:tS the mainstru:ctUre. '.
Please see photos. The Goodland Civic Association has voiced no concern about this
variance request. Letter from affected neighbor is also attached.
. '
"
,.... .....':"..\ '. .
r-n
I
I
I
j';.
3
c:
Agenda Item No. 17A
May 10, 2005
Page 18 of 43
7. Are there natural conditions or physically inducetl contlitions that' amelior~te the
g'oals and objectives of the.r~gulation such as natural preserves, lakes, 'golf course, etc.," ,
No.
8.' Will granting the variance be consistent with the growth management plan.
Not Applicable
, ** Section 2.7.2.3.2 (3) of th~ Land Development-Code requires an applicant ~Q rell,love
their public hearing advertising sign (s) after filial action is taken by the Boar(lofCo~nty "
Commissioners. Based on the~oard's final action on this item, please remove all' public'.
hearing advertising ~ign (s) ~ediately ,
\ ~:.
r(... '~
,',"','.
" ';
,"" .r~i ~
., ,. , " I ," ;'';-'' . '~I~.. I
..( ,'f" ,
, ~"..
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 19 of 43
Page 1 ofl
~
Subject property in blue.
Sirnilar properties in orange.
L
Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 20 of 43
,..-.... ....:l -.:t-,
en tzJ ,0
~ 0
Eo-< Eo-< N
Z 0::
-< Ol
'"-'" CO
u
0... Z w
-< 0
~ Z -<
Q W
:>< j ~
Eo-< 0... !::t.. 0
...... 0
Z
- tzJ
U Eo-< tzJ
...... ...... U
> en
Z 0 i
tzJ
Q II rI.l
...... -
en ;- ~
tzJ 0\8 :s
0:: w ~fi:E~
....J
<( itl~~
u
(J'l e;"-
~~~~
>~=
~
~
~
c
c
~
,,'
~
\
z
00' <i.{/~
'\ Q<i.{\\It..
~ t.. S ,.------
GOOQ\..Jl-~Q --.....
~
.----."'-
----
~~~ ' -
~~~ --
~t''':::~';::- -
~ ~_....-
,1
s
.~,...jl .
! . t ~_'.P'l-- Il"
I ...:i~ ~S\S. .1
~'-rst~G n
:<
2g
0-'
-,CD
:<
-'"
U
.....0
O.J
-,CD
--
--
z
III
....
~Jl-\t..<i.{~Jl-'<
-
a
..
.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
(i)
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 21 of 43
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPL~S, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 403-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
.......'
J\
VARIANCE PETITION
..' ......',...",;,.ltffi.i.l!t(t.rt~t\.;~:,:.,;:.;:".::')'O:ib]' 'tl~;L,.
~ &513
, '. ' , ,.' : ,'~;~~Jjl
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES
& SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Date: 1I/3/bV Time: 0 :30~AS&ignedPlanner:' fJ.<.f!...Id:- (;JillA~
8cu-:tkJl IreJ2L~
Project Addr/Location: .)0 1- O:r.~UQAJ..t:l.~ .Al1'f lJ,JeA:.b
Appll<G", NGm., ~.M..~ B ~ 1 Ph...,"1-:t-L} - ~ :rf)'7
Project Name:
Firm:
Type of Petition: ~ \J~ Current Zoning:
, Owner Name: \:):t AA..-_ V?JaA~
Owner Address: 5o~ ~~~l:>A..~one:
~~
Meeting Attendees: (attach Sign In She.t)
~' ~ \)~ CAiff~ '!-f~~
15 copies of completed Application In PrLU.. ~ SC~
g Addressing Checklist signed by Addressing Dept () .......... . --
,tl! Pre-application meeting notes
j(t1, 15 copies of Conceptual Site Pian 24" X 36" plus (one 8 % X 11 copy)
'.BJ Completed Owner/Agent Affidavits, Notarized
l&t 2 copies of Deed
~ 2 copies of List Identifying Owner & all parties of corporation
~ Location map
ro 5 copies of Aerial Photograph (taken within the previous 1 2 months)
o ~{f.t4 copies of EIS or EIS waiver ,
O}J P4 copies of TIS
o tJ A4 copies of Utility Provisions Statement with sketches
Sl . Eleetonlc copy of all documents and plans (CDROM or Diskette)
~ Historical Surveyor waiver request
~ Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification
~ Pre-application Fee $500.00 (to be credIted toward application fee below)
V A-2005-AR-6983
PROJECT #2004110053
DATE: 212/05
HEIDI WILLIAMS
1
Agenda ,Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 22 of 43
Review Fees: . lttrt:50' eft)
~ ~e$ldehtlal ~
TI $5000.00 Non-Residential
o $2000.00 Sign Vcnlance
J $681.00 Estimated legal Adyertlslng Fee - CCPC Meeting
$205.00 Estlmeted legal Advertising Fee - BCC Meeting
(any over- or und,r-payment will be reconciled upon receipt of Involee from Naples
Deily News).
o $1 600.00 EIS Review
OTHER REQUIREMENTS,
o
o
o
o
'\
NOTES:
~ LM'~ t--LA.
=;~::, ~L~l~~~~~(~~f€X"N
~~~It;~1:;~,1o~J<
.,
l
Agent/Owner Signature
Date
2
rlt1'iHl ,
,.....
..;~ji~l;J' , ."
,~,' j::,~p:,p,<
.,.
, . '. :. .
"I:.."~".. ..,.
: - . ", .::~: ,,' .
.' '.' ......, ,',
..:': :~.:
. ..... .':
;:' . .... . ~ . ~
I' "-:-' ,
, . . . ,~,':' ':
,'.'. .'.'.'..." ,. "
..... . j:.. :' . ~
:, ' ':- ~ , ..,"
~
-
~
~
<:0
.
~
os;
~
cw::
- J
c
~
E
A.
0
11
w r
~ ~j
<
Q 0<<$
m .'
o~ ~
N
-
0
- III
C III
~ l!
E ."
1: ."
a <(
A. -
~ 0-
0 a
:e
1 I
LLI
w
~
<
z
ti
w
""t
o
~
A.
~
<S'
~
\
en
cw:: -
z~
Z
<C
....
A.
C
w
Z
C>
Vi
en
<(
..
~
.a
E
~
z
~
c
o
.c
A.
:. :~
:/'
n"
..,"',
'1.'.'...'.<.."..'.""..>,:.
;:'::! -4
:c"}
';,;J
'1--":;
" :.,
.;.,. .....:.>::
.,.",:n~)i~i
'.' ,f"
... .-:,~<_:: ~:~
I
!)
;Z
i
::c....' .,
'Cb'
-
~
~
t")
~
"""",,:,,:,
;Z.". "
D'I'
......'.!
,*",'
--,'"
~."........
.,..., .
:1:': ':
Er"1!-
)...' '.'.R.'. '..'
.... .' "-','
'm'
..'8'.....:..........'..'.'
~ . '.' ::" . ..;
. r .,.' .
~
~
="
l!!
N"
~
co
i:i
CIl
en
'S;
l!!
u
0
"C
tLi
w
:c
(/')
~
z
CJ
~
E
.E
c..
Q.
1
~
c
~
='
~
CJ
..
. ~/22/2Be4 le:27 2395305306
. ~'i' ""'~
IT DEPT BLD H
Agencla ItaJWbNo.~7A
MayrfU,2tt05
Page 24 of 43
-T
ADJ)RESSING CJmCKI;~~T
Pl~e oo~J~ the following _ submit to tho Addressing Section for R.evi~. Not all items will Bnftly to ev=:y
pnuect. Items m bold t'VDe are requireg.
I. ~ d*>ipdoa of
t;.
2. Folio (Property ID) ,1l1Ullber(.) of above (attach to, or as,0ci4te With, legal description ifmor.than one)
7"$'7 t::JOgoD~Z- '".
3. Street address or addres80s (DS appliCQb~ if already as,igntUl)
b-o 7 c:;.o~~ let 11 61JJl'f1 t,J S ~~' r. ,
~-;;:~.a L~~ . r: <.. .;.r~ ~~
4. Loca_ ....P. Bbowing _Iocatt"" ofPlOJoct/tlIo in ftl on to _ pubHo mad J!&hl-or-way (attach)
5. Copy ofBtlt'Vey (NEBDBD ONLY FOR UNPLATTED PROPBR.TIBS) , , .
6. Proposed pioJcct name (if appltCIJble) , '
7. Proposed Street names (if applicable)
8. Site Deve10pinent PIan Number (FOR BXISTING PROJECTS/SITES ONLY)
SI>P . '
-
9. Petitio1l ~ - (Com.plete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition Type)
,
rJ SDP (Site DeveiopmentPlan)
[J SDP A (SDP Amendment)
C SDPI (SOP Insubstantial ChanSC)
C SIP (Site Improvement P1an)
1:1 SlP A (SIP Insubstantial Change) ,
C SNR. (Street Name Change)
o VegetationlBxotic (Yeg. Removal Permits)
.JR!/.n Use Petition (Variance. Conditional Use,
Boat Dock :Ext, Rezone, PUn rezone, etc.)
C Other ~ Deeoribe:
10. Project or development names proposed fbr. or alreadyappcarins in, condominium documonts (if applicable;
indicate whether proposed or existing) .', ,
c PPL (plans" Plat R.eview)
IJ PSP (pre1iminmoy Subdivision Plat)
o FP (Final Plat)
o LLA (Lot I.Jne Adjustment)
rJ BL (Blasiing Permit) ,
CROW (Right-of-Way Pmnit)
1:1 BXP (Exoavation Permit)
o VRSFP (Veg. Removal &: Site Fill Permit)
11. Please Check One: CJ Checklist is to be Faxed Back ~Pe:rsonally Picked Up
12. AppliC8Dt Nam.eJJAIJ) 11. J -BAA ," (Z' Pho1le77'1..,1fq, Fax . .
13. Signature on Addressing Chcck1ist docs not constitute Project audlor S~ Name approval and IS subJI!J;t to
further review by the Addrelling Section.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Primary Number J a ~ scg I L
Address Number I 'Z-i S <g ~
Address Number
Address Number Approved by J)-Y'\~~ M~at'Y'\ Date I D - 'Z-s _ Ol.j..
"
:. ~/22/2eB4 10: 27
...........-
IT DEPT BLD H
2:39531!1531!16
Updeted sa of 8121104
"",""
,,1
\
. l '.
..,
GOODLAND ZONING o VERLA Y BOUNDARY
GZO- Map 1
.' .
Agenda It~o.j]A
M131"fO, 1005
Page 25 of 43
"
I
1. Permitted uses. The following uses are permItted as of right In, this
subdistrict:
~eserv.d.
fI1lgt 64 or 118
I ----
.. ~
,". ...
":a.o"" .. -:, .
. ...... ~
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 26 of 43
WilljamsHeidi ;,-
subject:
Location:
Pre-app - Dan Barthel, Agent Heidi Williams, Planner
cds-c
Start:
End:
Wed 11/3/2004 8:30 AM
Wed 11/3/2004 9:30 AM
Meeting Status:
Required Attendees:
(none)
Accepted
Recurrence:
CDS-C; WiIIlamsHeidl; AblerKenneth; seaLs; SawyerMichael
Pre-app (After-the-fact) Variance - Dan Barthel, Agent, 774-8789, for a front and side yard setback variance - Front wil be
from 20 feet to 1 foot and side is from 5 feet to 1 foot for a single-family residence located at 507 Goodland Drive West.
Folio Number 46370080002.
1
--- .--------
Map Output
Agenda 1~~$.<W.1\
May 10, 2005
Page 27 of 43
Jo;.
.
.
----.--
---
"~-200S_AUR_6983
PROJECT #2004110053
D~ TE: 2/2105
HEIDI WILLI~MS
http://arc.collierappraiser.cOmlservletlcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ccpa_desig. .. 11/3/2004
-
....
o
---
,
J)
~
=--
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 30 of 43
~'
><:,
ai
Z'
><:i
Il)i
"'0'
C:'
-'
;>'
Il)!
....1
Q."
IrI
8
~
\0
~
~
.s
.s:::
~
-
"'=t
00
~l
.9
...:l
~
E-<
~
a
u
.5
r:/')
~
u
o
~
~
~
t.;:::
Agenda Item1Noo2b~~
May .
Page 31 of 43
=-'
. \!
l, ~
~
g
rI.)
112; ~
0-.8 ;:s
;S~~
v'lljN~
g~~-
~oe-e
~f~S
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 32 of 43
~
=
~ V,l
i~ ~
;~l:l
I~"~
~~5~
>I:l.Q;:C
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 33 of 43
I'f'l
:g
=
- ~
;j~ ~
01= <(
If= ...
~~~d
~t~~
ie;.....
r:'o~e
><(;c::<(~-
~Qt:.
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10,2005
Page 34 of 43
"..-.-.
. ~
. .,'f' .,.
'Y".;".:~~,,,).i'~#_. :~L
J.. .'.""/!]',.....
~:,;~l:,~ij
'::~;;~~~
,"""'(-";.!'~
:, ':1'~!.!!;S~'~
't ,; ,~~,t....::~'rIl."
l .\ ~?.;:.!;~'f.
. :', ~.', ~~l:ll;~,;~~;
...,',J':',',..~,
i
.-c I:'I.l
i~ ~
~~~~
.), C N Ii
~!!!;..~
~O~e
>f~S
ttt 24502~e~itNfs 1102 tt.
UCOIDID 18 orlrCI1lo 1~0HiH~, n '
OJ/U/lm It OI:UlII I, lloa;"CJ,JU
COl. noo
IIC m b.
DOC-, TO m.oo
V A-200S-AR-6983
PROJECT #2004110053
DATE: 212105
HEIDI WILLIAMS
IltII: ,
101m. mml
JI5 10m COLUlI 1m
IIlICO JlLAID n 3IllS '
Grantee 8.S. No.:
Grantee S.S. No.:
Property Appraiser's Parcel
Identification No.: 46370080002
W AltRANTY DEED
, ,.,1J-
THIS INDENTURE, made this.l!::.-. day of March, 1999, between ELLEN BRADLEY, an
unremarred widow, whose address is 507 WI Goodland Drive, Goodland, Florida 34140, grantor, to
DANIEL 1. BJm.THEL and GAIT. M. B!l.R.THEL, whose address is 4423 Bryner Drive West, Seattle,
Washington 98199, grantee. *
, WlTNESSETII, that grantor for and in colUideration of the sum of ten dollars, to him in hand I ; I ;
paid by grantee, the receipt whereofis hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargainrd, and sold to grantee, == ii ..
his heirs and assigns forever, the following descnoed land, situated, and being in Collier COlDlty, Florida, Ii B a
to~t ~~~
....=:3
... ..
-
--
=5
..
. Lot 2, Block A. Goodland Isles, as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book
6, Page 7, Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
*THIS DEED IS BEING RE-RECORDED TO CORRECT A SCRIVENOR'S ERROR
IN THE LAST NAME OF THE GRANTEE
Subject to restrictions, reservations, and easements ofrecord and the taxes for the year 1999.
And grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to the land and will defend the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal the date first above
written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
~enc~ .
~- /--4A'-~
Witness ..
t::~:;G~"
.~:ne: b€1!4/tr e. (!l9lVlffJCf
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUN'IY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this l~daY of March, 1999, by Ellen
Bradley, who ispersonally known to me or who has produced lIer" ~~rs. IlclMtse BS
identification. .
~~ ~~,
(SelIl)
!l u,;, I:. f "-"-"-ot
N . ta:y Public ., "'d-
nt name:
State of Florida
My commission expires:
TIfIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY:
FREDERICK C. KRAMER. ESQ.
950 North Co1lier Boulevard
Marco Island, Florida 34145
CD" . DEBBI! E, CNWJY
MY COMII8IDI , cc.....
'. ' EXl'NII'MayD.1l101
1andod'l1l/ll..,NIII~
~ "
t"
-II
aM
===-=
::_r
....~ ~
:. - (.
.......'"
~gs
=1'-
! .
~_r
..r
m-'-
~a..
~:~
~ Cl
~ :
c'
n
:=
..
...
...
...
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 36 of 43
.'i'............
~
V A-1oo5-AR-6983
PROJECT #2004110053
DATE: 1/2/05
HEIDI WILLIAMS
AFFIDAVIT
, \ \ l3 r1a-Pl
Well, J) ~ kJ 11~L ~ ~^ rt _ 1.1. I( being first duly sworn, depose and say that well
amlare the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the
proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the
disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to
and made a part of this application. are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief
Well understand that the information requested on this application must be completB and
accurate and that the content of this fOrm, whether computer generated or County printed shall
not be altered Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete,
and all required information has been submitted
As property er Well fUrther authorize
pr 'sentattve in any matters regarding this Petition.
to act
~/f/ 64~1~f
Signa e of Property Owner
Signature of Property Owner
\) ~~\.e.1 ~ to ~ ()r~~e {
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
@-(l C ~ /'f1, B/4 ~ rt.. ~)
Typed or Printed Name of Owner .
J Thepregoing instrument was ac1mowledgod Defore me thiS fJ'/(. day of ~
~7 ~ ----J by who is personally knawn to me or has produced
~ 0 L- as identification.
(Signature 0 olary Public - State of
FIO~~ -A I Sr. ~ L
ce C e.tJ
(print, Type, 'or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary'Public)
State of Florida
County of Collier
, 1 RACHEL SCHENK
"ll'" MotarY pllbllc:. Slale 01 ~7
110. li My c:omm. e..pres !)eC:. ~ I.
No. 00 276273
':'/'
LB/22/2B04 10:21 23953B53B6
IT DEPT BLD H
Agenda~o~~7A
May 10, 2005
Page 37 of 43
AD~RESSING CHIl:CKI'l!I
P1~ OOIIlpl~ 1ha 1i>Jlowing IIlll ~ to lb. Addreosing Section fur Revi.... Not PlI i""". will """Iy to ~
pro,ect. Items m bold tvDe are reau.ireg, ,
1. ~I description of s . eet prop
~ 0
c::.
2. Folio (Propirly ID) .1lDIber(1) of above (Il#ach 10, or "'ocia~ W/tIo, logrzldQcrlption ifmore lhan _)
3. Street ~ or addresses (as applicab~ if a/ready assigned)
b-07G-o~l1(fu",/l,)S ~~r. '
~-i1t!:1R:. ~ A..M P F {. ';sc;-/ ~ .
4. LoealIoJJ -p, ShOWing -Iooalion ofprojoctlorte in '" 011 to n_ publio mad rishl-of-way <atID"")
5. Copyofsuryey(NBBDBD ONLY FOR UNPLATrEDPROPBRTlBS) , ,
6. ' Proposed project name (if applicable)
7. Proposed Street names (if applicable)
8. Site Development Plan Number (FOR EXISTING PROJBCTS/SlTES ONI. Y)
SOP _
-
9. Petition Type - (Complete a separate Addressing Checlclist for each Petition l)pe)
(
o SDP (Site DevelOpment Plan)
[J SDP A (SDP Amendment)
[J SDPI (SDP Insubstantial Change)
CSIP (Site Improvement Plan)
I:J SIP A (SIP Insubstantial Change) ,
o SNR(Street Name Change)
o Vcgetation/Exotic (Yeg. Removal Permits)
~ Use Petition (Variance. Conditional Use,
Boat Dock Ext, Rezone. PUn rezone, etc.)
o Other - Describe:
10. Project or development names proposed for. or already appl:larins in, condominium documents (if applicable;
indicate whether proposed or existing) . ' .
C PPL (Plans & Plat Review)
[J PSP (Prelin:Unmy Subdivision Plat)
o FP (Final Plat)
o LLA (Lot Line Adjustment)
[J BL (Blasting Permit)
o ROW (Right-of-Way Permit)
C BXP (Exoavation Pennit)
CJ VRSFP (Veg. Removal & Site Fill Permit)
11. Please Check One: [J Cheoklist is to be Faxed Back ~PersorJJ1l1y Picked Up
12. Applloont NOlDe ..b2ArrJ 111, J ISAAi4 ~ 1 PII... 71</.. f.1tt/ Fa: "
13. Signaturcon'Add.ressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and 18 subject to
further review by the Addressing Section.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Primaty Number J a <l scg I.
Address Number -1 '2-'b S <g ~
Address Number
Address Number Approved by ..lln ~J JJ M~o... f'V\ Date I 0 - z...s _ ot.r __
v A-200S-AR-6983
PROJECT #2004110053
DATE: 212/05
. HEIDI WILLIAMS
L_
Agenda Item No. 17A
May 10, 2005
Page 39 of 43
J W DOUGLAS PO BOX 637, W., GOODLAND FL 34140
PHONE 239-642-6526
Email iiver(@naple~nel.
November 2, 2004
Collier County
Naples
FL
To whom it mav concern
Dear Sir or Madam,
I understand that my neighbors Mr. & Mrs. Barthel are
having problems over the County with tbe carport which is at S07 Goodland Drive
W. GoodIand. Since the structure has been there in fuB view for several years with
no problems I wonder which spiteful person has taken it upon them selves to
complain.
There are several things that come to mind.
11 It is immediately next to my property & I have no objection to it.
21 In the twenty years we have lived here there has always been a carport in that
location though a chintzy structure that just served a purpose but offered no visual
interest.
3/. The structure is solid, attractive & well maintained. It is an asset to the
community in that it adds "tone" to the ar~a.
4/. Tbe structure serves as a sbelter from the weather for scbool chUdrea that
gather under it while waiting for the school bus. It is in a good location for that
purpose since there is an overhead streetlight adjacent to it.
51. We are not blest with space as in otber communities to build structures to
protect our very expeuive cars since the house lots are very smaU. The results can
be seen in looking at older can in the area with faded paint work, so people eitber
suffer or do wbat they can.
6/. The carport serves as a structure to support several orchids which passers by
have been seen admiring.
7/. It is a pleasut contrast to commercial buildings in the vicinity, which in my
opinioD should be ton down or made more attractive.
It is my belief that if the COUDty is so misguided as to insist it be removed, that
the COUDty should at great expense in building & perpetual maiDtenance costs,
build a school bus stop in Goodland.
Yours sincerely,
IA & .rw DoO""', r (\
puv.
V A-200S-AR-6983
PROJECT #2004110053
DATE: 212/05
HEIDI WILLIAMS
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10,2005
Page 40 of 43
J W DOUGLAS PO BOX 637, 509, GOODLAND FL 34140
PHONE 239-642-6526
Email jiver@naples.net
March 21, 2005
Dept of Zoning & Land Development Review R EC E IVE 0
2800, N. Horseshoe Drive,
Naples, FL 34104 MAR 2 5 2005
REF PETITION V A-2005-AR-6983
ZONING DEPARTMENT
Dear Ladies & Gentlemen,
The house in question is next to mine & I support Mr.
Barthel in his petition.
1. The house, for at least 25 years, had a car port in this general location
though it was a flimsy aluminum structure that would only
accommodate one car, which is all the previous owner had.
2. The normal household, like the Barthel's, posses two vehicles these
days.
3. We do not have large lots in Goodland or possess the big houses
common in other parts of the County so finding shelter from the
elements for our vehicles is difficult if not impossible.
4. The solid structure is an asset to the area among so much that is
unsightly.
5. Children congregate in the shelter awaiting the school bus & utilize
the garden of the Barthel's to store their bicycles & skate boards so
the structure is a community asset.
6. The structure is within the fence line of their house so does not intrude
on anyone else's property or view.
Yours sincerely,
J W Douglas
(}-'\A
,
Agenda Item No. 17 A
May 10, 2005
Page 41 of 43
RESOLUTION 05-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY RELATING TO
PETITION NUMBER Y A-2005-AR-6983 TO REDUCE
THE FRONT SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 3.3 FEET
AND THE SIDE SETBACK FROM 5 FEET TO 1.2 FEET
TO ACCOMMODATE A SHADE TRELLIS OVER A
PARKING AREA ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes,
has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning
and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(LDC) (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of
particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of
the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and
provided, and has considered the advisability to reduce the front yard requirement set forth in
LDC Section 2.07.00 from 25 feet to allow a 3.3-foot setback and the side yard requirement
set forth in LDC Section 4.02.22 from 5 feet to 1.2 feet to accommodate a shade trellis over a
parking area as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A," in a RSF-4 Zone with the GZO
overlay for the subject property, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision
and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said
regulations and in accordance with Section 9.04.00 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land
Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this
Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED BY The Board of Zoning Appeals of
Collier County, Florida, that:
The Petition VA-2004-AR-6983 filed by Daniel J. & Gail M. Barthel, with respect to
the subject property described as:
Section 18, Township 52, Range 27, Block A, Lot 2, Goodland Isles,
Collier County, Florida, Plat Book 6, Page 7,
be and the same hereby is approved to reduce the front yard requirement set forth in LDe
Section 2.07.00 from 25 feet to allow a 3.3-foot setback and the side yard requirement set
forth in LDC Section 4.02.22 from 5 feet to 1.2 feet to accommodate a shade trellis over a
Page 1 of2
..
-"
Agenda Item No. 17A
May 10, 2005
Page 42 of 43
parking area as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A," of the RSF-4 Zoning District
wherein said property is located. subject to the following conditions:
1. The variance is limited to a l.2-foot setback from the side property line, and a
3.3-foot setback from the front property line, as shown on the survey done by
Dennis M. Portella, Sr., on May 17, 1999.
2. The variance is limited to the location of the structure as depicted on the
survey provided. This provision would allow minor repairs or complete
replacement of the trellis if destroyed by acts of nature or man.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA.
200S-AR-6983 be recorded in the minutes of this Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
Done this
day of
,2005.
A TrEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DEPUTY CLERK
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
Patrick G. White
Assistant County Attorney
V A-200S-AR~983IHW/.p
Page 2 of2
I. Dennla M. Portello, Sr., 0 Regletered Lond SU.....)OlI" In the Stote of florid". hereby certify
thot the foregoing plat repni...t. 0 survey of the following deacrtbad pr...I_:
LOT :z. BLOCK .A., COOOlAND ISLES, oa recorded In Plot Boak e, page 7
0' tha Public Racorda of Collier County, Florldo. That a 811MIe)' 0' the above deecrlbed property wo. mada under my
dlrectlon and mMt. the Minimum TechnIcal Standorde 1I8 per Chopter 61017-6 Florlcfa ...dmln..trotlw Cod.. purauant to
S.ctlon "'72.027, florida Stotut... There ore no ....1bI. ancroochm..t. other than ahown. no "'Mmenta or dolm. of
_ementa of whIch we how knowl.dVe. No Utle _ch hoe been made by tha 811.....)01'. No ottempt has been made to
looate loote.. b....ath the surface.
Str.et ...ddr_ Ie 507 GoodIand West DrI.... Nopl... Fl. ,
Beartnge con'orm to Plot Book
Elevation. are N.G. V.O. run In from Bioi B72-"'979-B 'TIt'"
Property Ie In Flood Zone .14E,.
l00-~ lIood elevation II 11.0 a. per r.t.R.M. ponel
120067 0817 0, ~t.ed ""ne 3, 111811 I
~ ,...,~ Rll1011 11712.1lWO 0-4
' , ~?" RE'ftSEO & ,. " 10 SHOll F.F.E. . 0 UTlUllES.
r.(<i:. ~~, RE'ftSED:5 /01 FINAL 0-.5) P~U'.ll'IO CO-I
Dennl. M. Portella. Sr. #4!SCk REIIISED 11 /04 TO IHOW IIPRO\1EloIENlS
Not ""'Id unl... .Igned and Haled
with embOll.ed HOl.
CJI.-_ ..- ~ _....__ ."'.__r
.. . CCIIItImr MCIUIDI1' c. ~ \IDWCIL ""lUll '" .. 11th . ....... ."
& -.,. c:a.__ ___ ....__,
-,... . ~ ~ . CN.- ~ NfiT _ .... . ,. WI: _ lie-.
o -nue... CII-~.....". CIt.~ w_--..
~--_..... ClIIC._ ._...., _____
r::':~ ex:: =- ~ : :U--==.-..r . ~ : =:V1DaIUM
o - :'-..lr-., ':: =r:.-' .. -,.,,, _ ~:;:...__
-r-._.. ..._ ....-_~___ .II::==""
,: : :c OCIIIIIJNIR If: Ill_ .:: : == :: ~ ~ . U'fIJTY
N'P.~tt mrr_~ ..-~ NIl W-IOCD
-_ - ~!.. ::: ~ f\.OIIt DorA... ~: =r:-~- .......,.:: : =-=-'
. -- - - fII't -.r ,...". _ '-'w.RT
-.:: : =- III :...... .... .: : MDIII .. .......
\
\
\
\.
~
,,-:..
1~
"!\OS
~\8.
~r-a
LOT 1
BLOCK .....
\
~
~
{'f\
~
~
\
LOT :5
BLOCK .A"
STATE OF' FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COWER)
NOTZS . BVIBlONS
-
E)( AA. h'~e ~Oli?~~
I J
\
\G')
\~
~
c:>
\~
\\
01
O.
';xl
-
::f
V A-2005-AJWtlD
PI\OJBCl 1ZM4111OS:J
DAn: 2I2Ill5
HBlDI WILUAMS
0lIIClIML SURVEY !We ...., 17, lHi
BOUlfDARY 8UBVIY
DAN IWn':HBL
PORTBLU. Ie ASSOCUTII:S, u.c WI 7so.c
2384 IJNWOOD Avt. NAPLES. FL 34112
SCALt: I". 2D' 114m ........ II, 2001
(231) 77&-81111
I'MIYUD rt1Il
Agenda Item No, 178
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 78
,...-.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PUDZ-2003-AR-3S8S, Wilson Boulevard Center PUD, Wilson Boulevard Center, LLC.,
represented by William L. Hoover, AICP, requesting a rezone from Planned Unit
Development (PUD) to PUD known as Wilson Boulevard Center for property located at the
southeast corner of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard, described as all of
Tract 17 and the west half of Tract 18, less the north 7S-feet for Golden Gate Boulevard
right-of-way, Golden Gate Estates Unit 13 in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 27
East, Collier County, Florida.
OBJECTIVE:
The petitioner seeks to rezone from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to pun known as Wilson
Boulevard Center for the purpose of revising the pun document.
CONSIDERA TIONS:
~.
The Wilson Boulevard Center PUD was originally approved by Collier County with the adoption
of Ordinance Number 00-72. In 2002 the applicant purchased this undeveloped property and in
2003 submitted this land use petition to make two changes to the pun document and Master
Plan. First, the applicant desires to update the ownership of the subject property. Second, the
applicant desires to change the water management area to be located within a portion of the 75-
foot-wide buffer along the eastern and southern boundaries of the subject property.
FISCAL IMP ACT:
The rezoning ofthis POO by and ofitself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is
no guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development,
however, if the property is rezoned, a portion of the existing land will be developed and the new
development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities.
The County collects impact fees before the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
identified projects in the Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element as needed to
maintain adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the
requirements of concurrency management, fifty percent (50%) of the estimated Transportation
Impact Fees' associated with the project are required to be paid simultaneously with the approval
of each final local development order. Other fees collected before the issuance of a building
permit include building permit review fees and utility fees associated with connecting to the
County's water and sewer system. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad
valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements.
Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by Staff
and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition.
,,-..
PUDZ-2003-AR-3585
Executive Summary
Bee Mtg. 5/1 0/05
Page 1 of3
Agenda Item No, 176
May 10,2005
Page 2 of 78
c-
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT:
The subject property is designated Estates (Estates - Mixed-Use District, Neighborhood Center
Subdistrict), as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
The Neighborhood Center Subdistrict permits commercial intermediate uses and Conditional
Uses of the Estates zoning district subject to specific development standards. The intent of the
Neighborhood Center Subdistrict is to allow for development to provide basic goods, services
and amenities to Estates residents while maintaining the semi-rural character of the area. This
includes "intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in
areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic... uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2 or C-3,"
though some uses are specifically prohibited, and Conditional Uses in the Estates zoning district.
Since the original PUD was approved in 2000, the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict has been
amended on May 14, 2002, September 10, 2003, and October 26, 2004. Also, the Land
Development Code (LDC) has been amended to change permitted uses in the C-1 thru C-3
zoning districts.
Development standards for neighborhood centers are intentionally stringent, especially buffer
requirements, in an effort to maintain the semi-rural character of the Estates and to protect
adjacent residential development from impacts of commercial development.
~
Based upon the above analysis, the proposed uses and development standards may be deemed
consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP).
TRANSPORTAION ISSUES:
The Transportation Service Division has reviewed the Petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement
(TIS) and has determined that the proposed rezoning will generate 1952 average daily trips at the
build-out of the project in 2005 (the original submittal was in 2003 with a two year projected
build-out and occupancy). As a result, this petition is consistent with policy 5.1 of the
Transportation Element.
Based on the analysis contained in the TIS, all roadway segments significantly impacted as a
result of the Wilson Boulevard Center PUD will operate at or above the adopted Level of Service
(LOS) standard for that roadway as established by Collier County.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and has incorporated safeguards within
the PUD document to insure compliance with the environmental regulations that are incorporated
in Environmental Section 4.7 of the PUD document.
The Environmental Advisory Council did not have to review this petition, because the proposed
area to be developed did not exceed the 10-acre minimum area requirement.
~
PUDZ-2003-AR-3585
Executive Summary
Bee Mtg. 5110/05
Page 2 of3
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10. 2005
Page 3 of 78
~
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPe) reviewed and approved this petition at their
April 21, 2005 meeting with a vote of6 to O. The approval included the following conditions:
I. A wall shall be constructed along the north side of the southern buffer and continuing
twenty-five feet north along the eastern buffer.
2. A bus stop shall be constructed and maintained by the petitioner. If approved by Collier
County, the bus stop shall be located on the Collier County Utilities wellfield site
property, which is located on the northwest corner of the Golden Gate Boulevard and
Wilson Boulevard intersection.
3. The subject property shall be developed in an "Old Florida Style" architectural theme.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
~.
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a
determination by the Board of County Commissioners (BCe) must be based. The legal
considerations are reflected in the CCPC evaluation of the listed criteria in Chapters 10.03.05
and 10.02.13.B.5 of the LDC. These evaluations are completed as separate documents that have
been incorporated into the attached staff report. A summary of the legal considerations and
findings are noted below:
. The proposed change has been deemed consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies
and Future Land Use Map and the applicable elements of the GMP.
. The proposed land uses are compatible with the existing land use pattern.
. The proposed change will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. This project has also been
deemed consistent with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Traffic Element of the GMP.
. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private, shall be provided.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners (BCe) approve petition PUDZ-
2003-AR-3585 that repeals Ordinance Number 00-72 as described by the attached Ordinance of
Adoption and exhibits thereto, the Wilson Boulevard Center PUD regulatory document.
PREPARED BY:
Michael J. DeRuntz, C.F.M., Principal Planner
Department of Zoning & Land Development Review
...--
PUDZ-2003-AR-3585
Executive Summary
Bee Mtg. 5/10/05
Page 3 of3
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 10, 2005
Page 4of7B
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Meeting Dlllo
,7B
ThIs item requires lhst all particIpants be sworn in lInd ex plrte disclosure be provided by
CommillSion member'. PUDZ-A.2003~AR.3585,Wilson Boulevard Center LLC represented
by WIlliam L.Hooller. of Hoover Planning 6. Development, Inc" reQLleltin~ 8 rezone from 8
Plsnnlld nit Development (PUD) zoning district to I Commercial Planned Unit
Development (CPUO) zoning district known B$ the Willan Boulevard Center PUD the
rezoning would have the effect Of amendinG the PUD Ordinance. A proposed change
would allOlN' the wlter manaGement afea to be located withIn R portion of the 76.1001 wide
buffer along tho !!Jaslern and southern boundaries of the subject PUD. The property to be
considered for the rf.l%one Is located on tho aoutl'1.ent corn6r of Golden Gate Boull!lvard
and WilBon Soulavlrd within II NIII~ghborhood Center of Golden Gllte E'818tes, 111 SecllOl'l
, 0, Township 49 SOllth, Range 27 Eas1, Collier County, Florida. this property cons.ists of
7.15 acres,
5/10/20059:oo:00AM
Item Number
item summlry
Approved By
Ray a.llows. Chief PI8n1l.r Date
Community Dev.lopm..,t & Zoning & land Developnl4!flt Review 4125/'l005 ':17 AM
Environment.' Serv)ce.
Approved By
'flndr. LltQ bt.u::u1ive Secnrtary cleO'
ComnMtnfty Dftvelopmctflt & Cotnrnunlty OeveIDpml~"t ... ~/:5/:005 8:11 AM
e"vinlllment..ISelVleltll Enyironmeflt.1 BerviecllI Ad",in.
Approved By
Constance A, Johnson Operations An..lYlit Dot.
CDmmlAnlty Development & Community Dovelopmon't & 4/%6/200510:17 AM
En"irDnmanta'Servi(:l(ls E.nvironmental SeNlce. Admin,
Approved By
Susan Murray, AICP Zon!"U & Land DUVCl'OPlt)CUlt DinH=to, o.~.
Comm'l.lnJty Oevelopment & ZO"'''I~ 4. LAnd Povftlllpnulnt RCl'II1ctw ~/:&1:00511:0K AM
Environmental S.rvielll"
Approved By
Don..ld L. Scott Transport.dorl Plantlln9 Dlreclor O.tl!'
Triln.portlon SltJ"tcuS lrllnuportatlon Plunnin9 41271100511:24 AM
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP Transportation Division Administrator Date
Tranaportion Servh:ea Tr.n.pcHtatlon Servicea Admin. ~/:8/'l005 7:43 AM
Approved By
Patrick G. White Ass~,tant Coun'ty Anonley D...
Caurlty Attonloy COlmtv AltornltY Office ~/:8/'lOO5 2:27 PM
Approved By
Co"u",rnity DItt\I'.eloprnent &
JOAcrph K. Schmitt Envlronmentl;! Servien Ac:lmh1.l.trator Datv
CClrnl'Ouolty DU\lulopn'Hl1lt &: Co,"",unlty O....lPlopmont &
Environmental Services Environmental S.rvlce. Admin, 4/28/'lOO5 ~:57 PM
Approved By
OMB CO(ltdinator AdmlnlK1r1tlve "'..I$tunt D....
County Manager'. Office Offic. 01 Mana"..".", 6 Budgat 41:81:0084:20 PM
Approved By
M.ne I50Ckson Budget An...l~st 0...
County Manager's Oftl(:1lt Office elf MaunUBrnent & 8udgClt 5/2/2005 i:18 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowskl Manag"ment & BUdget Dirac10r 0.1.
County Manager'. OffiCe O.nee of ManDgttment & Budget 51:/2005 N 1 PM
Approved By
Jamcu. V. Mudd Cuunty MaM:lJer Dute
SDarel 01 County Count)' M.anager's Oftlcltl 51:/20068:10 PM
Commillsioners
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 78
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
DEPARTMENT OF WNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEARING DATE: APRIL 7, 2005
SUBJECT:
PETITION PUDZ-A-2003-AR-3585
AGENT/APPLICANT:
OWNER / AGENT: William L. Hoover, AICP
3785 Airport Road N., Suite B-1
Naples, FL 34105
REOUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting a rezone from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to
PUD known as Wilson Boulevard Center for the purpose of revising the PUD document.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject PUD is located at the southeast comer of Wilson Boulevard
and Golden Gate Boulevard, descnbed as all of tract 17 and the west half of Tract 18, less the north 7S feet
for Golden Gate Boulevard right-of-way, Golden Gate Estates Unit 13 in Section 10, Township 49 South,
Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (See illustration on following page)
PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The Wilson Boulevard Center PUD was originally approved by Collier County in Wilson Boulevard Center
PUD Ordinance Number 00-72 (Exhibit D). In 2002 the applicant pun:hased this undeveloped property, and
in 2003 submitted this land use petition to make two changes to the Wilson Boulevard Center PUD. First,
the applicant desires to update the ownership of the subject property. Second, the applicant desires to change
the water management area to be located within a portion of the 7S-foot wide buffer along the eastern and
southern boundaries of the subject property.
PUDZ-A-03-AR-3585,
WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER PUD
CCPC MTG. APRIL 7,2005
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 6 of 78
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
Subject Parcel:
Undeveloped wooded tract of land, zoned Estates
Golden Gate Boulevard then commercial convenience and single-family
residential dwelling, zoned C-2 and Estates,respectively
Undeveloped Estates lot and single-family residential dwelling, zoned Estates
Single-family residential dwellings, zoned Estates
Wilson Boulevard then undeveloped Estates lots, zoned Estates
Surrounding- North:
East:
South:
West:
ZONING MAP
PUDZ-A-03-AR-3585,
WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER PUD
2
CCPC MTG. APRIL 7, 2005
~
5,600 Feet
I
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 10, 2005
Page 7 of 78
AERIAL MAP
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY:
The subject property is designated Estates (Estates - Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict),
as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan.
Future Land Use Element: Relevant to this petition, the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict permits
commercial intermediate uses, and Conditional Uses of the "E" zoning district, subject to specific
development standards. The intent of the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict is to allow for development to
provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents while maintaining the semi-rural character of
PUDZ-A"'()3-AR-3585,
WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER PUD
3
CCPC MTG. APRIL 7, 2005
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 8 of 78
the area. This includes "intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services
in areas that have a higher degree of automobile 1raffic ... uses shall be similar to C-l, C-2 or C-3," though
some uses are specifically prohibited; and, Conditional Uses in the Estates zoning district.
Since the original PUD was approved in 2000, the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict has been amended (on
May 14,2002, September 10, 2003, and October 26,2004). Also, the LDC has been amended to change
permitted uses in the C-l thru C-3 zoning districts.
Development standards for Neighborhood Centers are intentionally stringent, especially buffer requirements,
in an effort to maintain the semi-rural character of the Estates, and to protect adjacent residential
development from impacts of commercial development.
Based upon the above analysis, the proposed uses may be deemed consistent with the GGAMP; and the
development standards may also be deemed consistent.
Transportation Element: The Transportation Department has reviewed the Petitioner's Traffic Impact
Statement (TIP) and has determined that the proposed rezoned will generate 1952 Average Daily trips at the
build-out of the project in 2005 (the original submittal was in 2003, and there was a two year projected build-
out and occupancy). As a result, this petition is consistent with policiy 5.1 of the Transportation Element.
Based on the analysis contained in the Traffic Impact Statement (Exhibit "C"), all roadway segments
significantly impacted as a result of the Wilson Boulevard Center PUD will operate at or above the adopted
Level of Service (LOS) standard for that roadway as established by Collier County.
Open Soace/Conservation: The PUD document indicates that a combination of landscape areas, buffers,
preserve areas, water management areas, and qualifying open space areas exceeds the Land Development
Code (WC) requirements, and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Estates-Mixed Use District,
Neighborhood Center Subdistrict criteria.
ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which
a favorable determination must be based. These criteria are specifically noted in Section 10.02.13 of the Land
Development Code and required staff evaluation and comment. The Planning Commission to the BCC also
used these criteria as the basis for their recommendation. Appropriate evaluation of petitions for amendments
to PUDs should establish a factual basis for supportive action by appointed and elected decision-makers.
Each of the potential impacts or considerations identified during the staff review are listed under each of the
criterion noted and are summarized by staff, culminating in a determination of compliance, non-compliance,
or compliance with mitigation. These evaluations are completed as separate documents and are attached to
the staff report (See Exlnbit "An and Exhibit "B").
Environmental Analvsis: Environmental Services Staff has reviewed the petition and has incoIporated
safeguards within the PUD document to insure compliance with the environmental regulations. The
Environmental Section 4.7 of the PUD document.
The Environmental Advisory Council did not have to review this petition, because the proposed area to be
developed did not exceed the ten-acre minimum area requirement.
PUDZ-A-03-AR-3585,
WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER PUD
4
CCPC MfG. APRIL 7, 2005
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 9 of 78
Tran~rtation Analysis: Transportation Department Staff has reviewed the petition and has recommended
approval subject to the conditions contained in Section 4.9 of the PUD document.
Utility Issues: The Utilities Department Staffhas reviewed the petition, and has recommended approval
subject to the conditions contained in Section 4.8 of the PUD document.
Zoning and Land DevelQpment Review Analvsis: The evaluation by professional staff includes an analysis
of the project's relationship to the community's future land use plan, and whether or not a rezoning action
would be consistent with the GMP. Other evaluation considerations include an assessment of adequacy of
transportation infrastructure, other infrastructure, and compatibility with adjacent land uses. In addition, staff
offers the following synopsis:
Relationship to Existing Land Uses - The subject property is bordered by Golden Gate Boulevard, Wilson
Boulevard, and Estates developed and undeveloped lots. The subject property is located in the Estates
district. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) in the Land Development Code (LDC) and the
Growth Management Plan (GMP) governs the Estates district. Within the GGAMP, the subject property is
classified as a ''Neighborhood Center Subdistrict." The Neighborhood Center Subdistrict permits C-l, C-2,
and C-3 commercial uses as specified within the criteria of this Subdistrict. The petitioner proposed to
develop the subject property within the criteria of the Subdistrict. The subject property is located within the
first zone of the Collier County Utilities Wellfield. The storage and use of hazardous materials are
prohibited. The PUD document prohibits the storage and use of hazardous material on the subject property.
Therefore, staff believes the uses allowed in the petition would not adversely impact the existing residential
land uses in the area. Furthermore, staff believes that the development regulations, architectura1 standards,
landscaping, storm water management, and buffering requirements of the PUD district would meet the goals
of the GMP, and enhance the aesthetic quality of this area.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING:
A Neighborhood Information Meeting was held at the Golden Gate Estates Library on May 7, 2003. The
meeting began at 5:30 pm. There were approximately 20 persons in attendance including Fred Reischl,
former Collier County Principal Planner, Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator, Jeff Davidson,
Davidson Engineering, and Bill Hoover, Hoover Planning and Development. Fred Reischl briefly described
the petition process. Linda Bedtelyon welcomed the public comments.
Mr. Hoover provided a history of the land's purchase history, and the previous rezoning that had occurred on
this property. He outlined what the petition was proposing on the subject property. The first change would
be the related to the ownership of the subject property. The second change would be related to the location
of the water management on the subject property. Of the approximately six acres, only about four acres
would be developed with buildings and parking. Potential uses identified were: a bank, a restaurant, office
and retail.
The question was asked if a gas station would be a possible use at this location. Mr. Hoover stated that
because of the well recharge area that exists in this area, it was not possible.
PUDZ-A-03-AR-3585,
WILSON BOULEY ARD CENTER PUD
5
CCPC MTG. APRIL 7, 2005
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 10 of 78
A brief discussion occurred concerning any additional land added onto the existing project. Mr. Hoover
explained that the surrounding property owners had no interest in selling. He went on to describe some of
the other local commercial changes that are in the process.
Jeff Davidson was requested to explain the water management change. Jeff explained the requirement for
the 75-foot landscaped buffer on the property adjoining the Estates zoned property. The current problem was
the need for a lOO-foot-wide lake built on the land for the water management, which made site planning
difficult. It was further explained the water management would now be placed within a portion of the 75-
foot wide buffers. The County environmental staff had given preliminary approval of the conceptual site
plan.
A question was asked if this change would affect the surrounding property and Jeff answeredt. no" and
further explained the 75-foot buffer in more detail.
Pictures illustrating the proposed water management and buffering area were provided, and Mr. Hoover
stated that construction was scheduled to start in the spring of 2005.
The meeting ended at approximately 6:30 pm.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPe) forward a recommendation of approval of Petition
PUDZ-A-2003-AR-3585 that repeals Ordinance Number 00-72 as descnbed by the Ordinance of Adoption
and exhibits theretot The Wilson Boulevard Center PUD regulatory document.
PUDZ-A-03-AR-3585,
WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER PUD
6 CCPC MfG. APRIL 7,2005
._.~~-"~........ -,----~... '
PREPARED BY:
MICHAEL 1. DE RUNTZ, C.F.M., PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIEWED BY:
RAY BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SUSAN MURRAY, AICP, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DATE
APPROVED BY:
JOSEPH K. SCHMIIT ADMINISTRATOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DMSION
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the May 10, 2005 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
RUSSELL A. BUDD, CHAIRMAN
PUDZ-A-03-AR.-3585,
WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER PUD
7
CCPC MTG. APRlL 7,2005
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 11 of 78
..
....
, ' A[enda Item No. 1 is
PUDZ-2003-AR-358S May 10, 2005
PROJECT #20030100jlJge 12 of 78
DATE: 1/13/03
FRED REISCBL
PETITION NAME: Wilson Boulevard Center }tOO
DATE: January 3,2003
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING
FOR
,PUD AMENDMENTIDO AMENDMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DMSION
CURRENT PLANNING SERVICES
1. Name of Applicant (s) William L. Hoover, Managing Member, Wilson Blvd. Center LLC
Applicant's Mailing Address378S Airport Road N., Suite B-1
City Naples,
State Florida
Zip3410S
Applicant's E-Mail Address:bill@hoovcrplanning.com
Applicant's Telephone Number: Res:
Bus. : (239) 403-8899
Fax#: (239) 403-9009
Is the applicant the owner of tile subject property? 1&1 Yes 0 No
o (a)
o (b)
o (c)
18I (d)
o (0)
o (t)
if applicant is a land trust, 80 indicate 8nd name beneficiaries below.
if applicant is cOrporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name
officers and major stockholders below.
If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership' or other business entity, so
indicate and name principals below.
If applicant is an: owner, indicate exactly as rec~rded, and list all other owners. if
any~
If applicant isa lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual ownmif n!)t
indicated on the lease. . "
If appliCant is a contract plitChaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual
owner(s) name and acldrilss below.
(If space is inadequate, attach on separate page.)
2. Name of AgentWilliam L. Hoover, AICP
FirmHoover Planning andDev., Inc.
CityNaples.
Agents Mailing Address3785 AiIport Road N., Suite B-1
State Florida
Zip34IOS
Agent's E-Mail Address:bill@hooverplanning.com
Telephone Numbers: Res.: (239)403 8333
Fax#: (239)403 9009
Bus. (239)403 8899
"\.
. ...
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10,2005
Page 13 of 78
3. PUD ORDINANCE NAME AND NUMBER: Wilson Boulevard Center PUD 00-72
4. DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THE APPLICATION (If
space is inadequate, attach on separate page. If request involves change to more than one zoning district,
include separate legal description for property involved in each district Ifproperty is odd-shaped, submit
five (5) copies ofllie survey (1" to 400' scale).
THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLYING THE CORRECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
IF QUESTIONS ARISE CONCERNING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AND ENGINEER'S
CERTIFICATION SHALL BE REQUIRED.
SECTION 10
TOWNSHIP 49 South
RANGE 27 East
All of Tract 17 and the west half of Tract 18 less the north 75 feet for Golden Gate Boulevard right-of-way, Golden
Gate Estates Unit 13, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 71 and 72 of the Public Records of Callier County, PI.
S. Address or location of Subject property The subject property is located lit the southeast comer of Wilson Blvd. and
Golden Gate Blvd. (unincorporated Collier County), Florida.
6. Does property owner own contiguous property to the subject property? ifso, give complete legal
description of entire contiguous property, (Ifspace is inadequate, attach on separate page).
N/A
7. TYPE OF AMENDMENT:
~
.~
D
A.
PUD Document Language Amendment
B.
PUD Master Plan Amendment
c.
Development Order Language Amendment
8. DOES AMENDMENT COMPLY WITIi THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
~Yes DNo if no, explain:
9. HAS A PUBLIC HEARING BEEN HELD ON THIS PROPERTY WITHIN TIlE LAST YEAR? IF SO,
IN WHOSE NAME?N/A
PETITION #:
DATE:
10. HAS ANY PORTION OF THE PUD BEEND SOLD and/or 0 DEVELOPED?
ARE ANY CHANGES PROPOSED FOR THE AREA SOLD AND/OR DEVELOPED?
D Yes ~No
IF YES, DESCRIBE: (A'ITACH ADDmONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY).
. .
l
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 14 of 78
William L. Hoover,. 378' Airport Road North, Suite B-1, Naples, Florida is the :Ml'nAgjng Member of
the Wilson Boulevard Ceoter LLC.
Ownership of the W1lson Boulevard Center lLC is as follows:
Share
10%
20%
5%
2.5%
5%
5%
5%
20%
22.5%
5%
100%
Investors' Names smd AndreAses
Tom Beaver, 345 Esther Street, Naples,FL 34104
Grady &, Nancy Minor, 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Pete Schoenauer, 1323 Chesapeake Avenue, Naples, FL 34102
Jeff &, Leaetta Davidson, 2154 Trade CeDtcr Way, Suite 3, Naples, FL 34109
Dick & Catherine Sb9nAhltn, 427 Barcelona Court, Marco Island, FL 34145
Randy Rose, 3775 Airport Road N., Suite A, Naples, FL 34105
Bill &, Charlene Hoover, 5690 Wax Myrtle Way, Naples, FL 34109
Tom &, Julie Hoover, 4025 Hillman Road, Morral. OH 43337
Peter Tiemey/Michael Moore, 921.5 Gu1fshore Drive N~, Naples, FL 34108
P"ndv & r.hervl MiUP.I", 1981 Scriniclliltlre Dr.. Ch;nn Hills. CA 91709
Total Shares '
PUD Rezone Considerations rLDC Section 2.7.3.2.5)
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 15 of 78
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, trafJic and access, drainage,
sewer, water, and other utilities.
Jurisdictional reviews by County staff support the nuinneJ;' and pattern: of the
proposed development for the subject property subject to the appropriate
mitigation. Development conditions contained in the PUD Document give assurance that all
infrastructures will be developed consistent with County regulations. Required mitigation measures
assure compliance with adopted LOS standards of the Growth Management Plan.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they
may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and
maintenance of such areas andfacilities that are not to be provided or maintained at
public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after
consultation with the county attorney.
Documents submitted with the application provide evidence of unified control. The PUD Document
makes appropriate provisions for the continuing operation and maintenance of common areas.
3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with, the goals, objectives and policies of the growth
management plan.
The Wilson Boulevard Center PUD's retail/office uses are consistent with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan.
, 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, r~strictions on design, and buffering and
screening requirements.
The PUD Master Plan has been coordinated with neighboring land uses and designed to optimize
extema1land use relationships. For example a 75' wide buffer abuts lands to both the east and to the
south.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
The amount of open space set aside by this project, a minimum of 30%, is consistent with the provisions of the
Land Development Code
4TH RE-SUBMITTAt
PUDZ-ZOO3-AR-3585
PROJECT #2003010010
DATE: 11/12/04
MIKE DERUNTZ
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 16 of 78
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both, public and private.
There are adequate and available facilities for this project. Furthermore, the timing or sequence of
developnient in light of concurrency requirements is not a problem.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
The project is in a Neighborhood Center in the Golden Gate Estates Area Master Plan, which has the
ability to accommodate expansion. The ability of the area to accommodate expansion due to this
project is subject to mitigation as contained in the PUD Document.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the
particular case, based on determination that such modifications of Justified as
meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such
regulations.
The criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards proposed
for the Wilson Boulevard Center PUD depart from development standards that would be ,required for
the most similar conventional zoning district. The development standards in the Wilson Boulevard
Center PUD are typically more strict than those in similar commercial zoning districts.
Exhibit" A" Rezoning Evaluation Criteria
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 17 of 78
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and
policies andjUture land use map and the elements of the growth management plan.
The Wilson Boulevard Center PUD is consistent with all applicable elements of the Golden
Gate Area MaSter Plan of the GMP. The project's proposed office/retail uses are also
consistent with the Growth Management Plan.
2. The existing land use pattern.
The proposed PUD will have office and retail uscs that will be of a lower intensity than the convenience store with gas
pumps difectly across Golden Gate Boulevard. The vllClU1t land abutting to the cast qualifies for Conditional Uses, such as
churches. The vacant land directly across Wilson Boulevard qualifies for rctai1/office uscs. Residential uses are approved
and exist to the south.
3. The possible creation, of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts.
The projects retail/office uses are of a lower intensity than those directly across Golden Gate
Boulevard.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property for the proposed change.
Not applicable.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
amendment (rezone) necessary.
Yes, the Board of County Commissioners recently approved amending the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to permit 1imitcd
commercial uses, such as the subject PUD. within Neighborhood Centers strategically located in the Golden Gate Estates.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The propoSed changes will not adversely intluenceliving conditions as the proposed retail and office uses will allow
neighboring residents to shop and have services without having to travelll minimum of S miles to other commercial activity
nodes.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
' create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding laiui uses, because' of
peak volumes or projected tjlpes of vehicular trafflc, including activity during
construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The subject PUD will allow residents within Golden Gate Estates to utilize the professional
offices, medical offices and retail services without having to drive outside the Golden Gate
Estates area. This will limit the number of miles residents must drive to obtain these services.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The project will be designed and permitted according to South Florida Water Management
District surface water permitting criteria. The proposed changes will have no effect on this.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
No change to light or air to adjacent areas will occur as the heights are limited and the
residential area to the south is separated by a planned Preserve Area
,,"-
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
, Page 18 of 78
10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent
area.
The proposed changes should have a positive affect on neighboring property values. This will
provide retail, professional, and possibly medical services to neighboring residents in reasonable
proximity to their homes.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development
of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
The creation of a moderate intensity retailIoffice project with architectural standards such as the subject one, is
generally considered by land planners to promote and enhance quality residential development around it
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege as the subject property is
located within a Neighborhood Center as approved by the Golden Gate Area Master Plan.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance '
with existing zoning.
Yes, the County Commissioners have determined that non-residential uses are appropriate at
Neighborhood Centers strategically located within Golden Gate Estates.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or
the county.
The proposed commercial uses are less intensive than those existing directly across Golden Gate Boulevard.
-
15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed
use in, districts already permitting such use.
Not applicable, as there is a shortage of specialty retail and office uses in this part of Collier
County.
j 6. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which
would be required to make the property wablefor any of the range ofpotent~al.uses
under the proposed zoning classification. '
The degree of ~teration woUld be typical of developing a vacant parCel of land for
commercial uses.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and
services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County growth
management plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended.
The proposed zoning change will not have a negative impact on the availability of adequate
public facilities and there will be adequate public facilities available for the proposed use.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners
shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safely, and welfare.
This project will meet all requirements of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and
concurrency requirements and have no negative impacts on the public health, safety, and welfare.
(i)
PUDZ-2003-AIt~~ Item No.178
May 10, 2005
PROJECT #2.003010~e 19 of 78
DATE: 1/13/03
FRED REISCBL
AFFIDA VIT
Well, Wilson Blvd. Center LLC being first duly sworn, depose and say that well
am/are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the
proposed hearing,' that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure
of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a
part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. Well
understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and
that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered.
Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required
information has been submitted.
, As property owner We/IjUrther authorize Davidson' Engr / Hoover Planning
as our/my representative in any matters regarding this Petition.
to act
1J~ tV %-~
Signature of Property Owner -
Signature of Property Owner
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
William L. Hoover, Managing Member
Wilson Blvd. Center LLC
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
State of Florida
County of Collier
The foreg,.o.lng instrumenl ~ iJ,;/edgod bifo... me this .;2h~ dayO.if /)ee .
200-Z:, by IJ)LII~ l. ' V~ who is personally known to me or has produced
MWsntiftCDn= ~4~
(Signature of Notary Public - State of
Florid1f. a\. Michael A Devil
;,~ i My CommlSllon 00138510
~Of",' ExpillllAugUlt01 2008
(print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
APPLICATION JrOR PUBLIC REARING FOR PUn RE-ZONE - 0212000
PAGE 17 OF 17
PREPARED BY AND RE11.lRN TO:
MaKia H. l.angley. Esq.
vreenberJ Traurig. P.A.
5100 Town Center Circ:le. Suile 400
Bocll RelC'n. Florida 33486
3082365 OR: 3158 PG: 0316
DeDIDID lu omCIlL IICOlDS of COLLm coum. lJ,
U110/2002 at 03:UPIl DVIG1'lI. IlOCI. 0.11I
COIS 1232500.00
DC m 15.00
DOC' .10 em .50
Reta:
GUlDllIi mum FA
m SDm ftllOUl DI noOl
'1ST PiLK meall mOl
PRycell.D. Nl>.: 37221240007
37221120004
~722116000b
WARRANTY DEED
THIS INDENTURE. is made .as of the I Sth day of November. 2002. between GOLDEN .
GATE LAND GROUP, LLC, a Florida Umlted lIablUty company. (the .'"Grantor"). whose
post office address is clo Bayshore Land Group. Inc., 255 Alhambra Circlc. Suitc 325. Coral
Gables. Florida. and WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER. LLC. a F10rida limited liability
company . (the "Grantec") whosc posl office address is 3785 Aitl)ort Road North. Suite B.l.
Naples. Florida 34105. '
~lItilillJi:
Grantor. in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($ 1(>.00)' and other good and
valuable considerations paid by Grantcc. the receipt and sufficiency or which are hereby
acknowlerlged. has granted. bargained and sold. and by these presents does grant. bargain. sen.
alien. remise. release. convey nnd confirm unto the Grantee. and Grantcc's heirs and assigns
forever. all right. title and interest ill nnd 10. the following described land. siluate. lying and being
in Collier County. Florida. to-wit:
SEE EXHIBIT" A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE APART HEREOF
SUBJECT TO zoning restrictions. prohibitions and other requirements imposed by
governmental authority; covenants. condilions. limitations. reserVations. restrictions and
casements of record or appearing on the plat or otherwise common to the subdivision. but this
reference shall no1 operate to reimpose the same~ and taxes and assessmen1s lor the year 2003
and tnereaf'ter; ,
TO HA VB AND TO HOLD the same. together with all hereditaments. easements. and
ll.ppunennriccs pcrtainingto or benefiting the same. unto Grantee. and Grantee'shcirs. successors
and llssigns in fee simple forever.
Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same againslthc
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
"Grantor" and "Grantee" an: used for singular or plural. as context requires.
OR: 3158 PG: 0377
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunder set their hands and seal iU of the day
and year first above writtc1l.
Signed. sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
GOLDEN GATE LAND GROUP. u..c, a
Florida Iimitecl liability company
By: Tumberry Bayshore. LC, a Florida
limited Iiabi1ity company, its Sole Member
_~4ft
Ch"iS~~ J7 M4&N~~
PriIll_ t1l "l
~ 4. t:. .-~o~
~otv_ il
. ~ M AJ;;:;(;"aft
. _a(W__
By: BAYSHORE LAND GROUP.INC., a
Florida corpomion, Managing Member
B~
. G, President
ST ATE OF FLORIDA
COUNl"Y OF MtAMJ-DADE )
The forqoiftg IDStnJmCnt was sworn to IIId ~ befbre 1M this ;:f.... day of NovCmbcr. 2002. by
JAY FERTIG. PresideIlt of BAYSHORE LAND GROUP. INC.. a Plorida eotpOI'8tiOll, MaDa&in& Member of
TURJllBERRY BA YSHORE. Le. a Florida limited liabWty CllIIIlIl*II1. the Sole Member of GOLDEN GATE LAND
GROUP. u.c. a Florida limitl:d liability oomplID)'. 011 bebalf cI thc compIlII)'. who I, kl pamnaUy kJICIWII to me or
I 1 bas produced ulcleatlficaliclll.
__6 Ik. e:-..,,~
Notary Public:. SIBle of Florida U
My commiuion oxpirec:
(NOTARY STAMP) ~..... AdaMI'aniaguI
. -J"': My eomrnoa- 0004206S
,,...,/ EIqIftS July 27 2005
2
-,
,..<1 ,A.
9 n . 178
tit OR: 3158 PG: 0318 _~2 ~~~~
,-
....Y1iD1MT MA"
PAlIlnq.1:
'fIa. Weft .. of Tn. lW. 11, GOLDEN GATE BlTA'l1IlS, UNIT NO. IS~ accerdiIIc Ie
tbe all' or. plat tbereot reeordtd hi ... JlMk 7, .... '71 ... T2, or the .... :Recorda or
Colter Cou." Rorida.
'''~.~:
... Eut lSOfeet,"'~ N..1'7. GOJ..DD GAil: Il81'A'lTB. tJNITNO.IS,.......te
die ..por plat ~ reeerded Ia flat'" '..... n.... 'l2torae........... of
CoDIer Otaaty, JIor.kIa. . , ' ',.," ",
MIICEL ,=
The Welt 208 feet et''I'Net N.. ", GQLDD( GATlESTATD. UNIT NO. 13, ........
to tile .... or plat thweof, reeorded ID Plat ... '1, .... '11 aDd '12, ortlae PDMIc .....
or CoIIiIr eoat)'. JIorIdI.
.-
3
..-....-...-..
3082364 OR: 3158 PG: 0374
UClIIDD 11 orncIlLlICOIII1 of COUtUI comt, n
11/21/2..2 at u:ml DlIm I. lilla, CUU
lit !II - U.5'
1IlIC-. TI . ,.
COUll t ...
bta:
....". COLllll n 1L
...1 !WII1 'ft . UN
urw n 3m3
WARRANTY DEED
nus WARRANTY DEED. made on Ule~daY of November. 2002. between Mary Jo
Gibbs, a sialle WOIllaD, whose post office address is 1400 Pompei Lane, ##11, Naplel, Florida
34103. Grantor. and Mary Jo Gibbs, a .mp W......, ad RamoDa G. Colemaa. a married
womaD, a. jOiDt teaaDb with full rilbtl of lurvivonblp, whose post office address is 1400
Pompei Lane, #21, Naples, Florida 34103, Grantee. (Where used herein the tenns Grantor and
Grantee shall be construed as singular or plural as the context requires.)
WITNESSETH that the Grantor. for and in consideration of the sum ofTEN AND 00/100
DOLLARS ($ 1 0.00) and other good and valuable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee.
the receipt whercofis hereby acknowledged. has granted. bargained and sold to the said Grantee and
Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate. lying and being in the
County of Collier. State of Florida. 10 wit:
Ualt No. 21, Group F, SORRENTO VILLAS, a CODdoadDhim, .. more rully
,bowD iD Official Reeords Book 528, Pales t throu'" 39, Public Recordl of
ColUerCouDty, Florida; tOlether wltb .U undivided interests iD the common
elements or surpluses aecruiDg to said property.
Property 10 No. 73981640008
Subject to: (a) ad valorem real property taxes for th~ year 2002 and subsequent years:
(b) 7.oning. building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental
authority. (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record. if any: and (d)
restrictions, reservations. and easements common to the subdivision, if any.
TOOETIlER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or
in anywise appertaining.
AND the Grantor hereby covenants with the Grantee that the Granlor is lawfully seized of
said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey this
land; thai the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to the land and will defend the same against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
WaJ'T'U\Iy Deed
hac I of2
tit OR: 3158 PG: 0375 ttt
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hc:reunto set her hands and seal the day and year
flfSt above written.
Signed. sealed. and delivered
in the p"resence of:
Grartor:
.~:r--1 ' ~ ''1-' .~~ /-il
Mary Jo Gibbs
t...I... (\,( L.~';'1 s '
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrUment was acknowledaed be.JPr- me this jcdday of November. 2002.
by Mary Jo Gibbs. a single woman. who is ~personany known to me or . _ who ha.'i
produced __- as identification. and who did not take an
oath.
(SEAL)
(ill~i.,'YI) /)., 9(!;.,y
Notary pu"Hc ..;
Print Name: ('-4-,(" t...,yJ ;sol Fo'l--
Commission 'Expires _ .~ /,'J.j..f.5'-
i "~. MY=:~:~l "
~ . NIl Ul05
....." ,-,..,.....-..-
PREPARED BY:
Craig D. Grider. Esq.
Ooodlcllc. ColelDan &: Johnson. P,A.
400 I Tamiami Trail North. SuilC, 300
Naples. Florida 34103
PREPARATION OF DEED ONLY.
NO OPiN10N OF TITLE RENDERED.
F -MlChM.,_.(laIM ~ 10 w......lllood...,..I
W 11TtIJ\ty Deed
Page 2 of2
---\
/'
OR: 3158 PG: 0377
IN WITNESS WHEllEOF. Grantor has hereUnder set their hands and seal u of the day
and year first above written.
Signed. sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
GOLDEN GATE LAND GROUP. u.c. I
Florida limited liability company
By: TumbenY Baysbore. LC. I Florida
limited liability company. its Sole Member
-~
~~~ 1- HuN.;'
~ ht. 12.:--0--=
~alW__ il
~ M AJ,'I16"at't
. _afw.-
By: BA YSHORE. LAND GROUP. INC.. a
F1Drida. corpontion. Managing Member
~.
By:
. , lit President
STATE Of pU)lUDA
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE )
nc roaeaama iDsInDJlllDl was nvom to .. ~ bd'ore me this t.L day r4~. 2002. by
JAY PERTlG. PRIicIcDt or BAYSHQRE LAND QIlOUP. INC.. a JII,orida ~ MuIaIiIIJ Member or
TtJRNBERllY BA YSHORB.1..C. . PIorida limited UIbUiC7 ClDIDJlU1. the Sole Member of GOLDEN GATE l.AND
QROUP. u.c.. Florida limilCd 1i8bI1Ity COIIlJIUI)'. OIl. bobalfoltllocompuy.wbD is.,,1 penoaaI}Y kJIOWIl to me Of
I 1 bas prodllCllll ,u ldDDdIClltklL
.. . _~~ I1c e...,~
NotIJY P\lb\ic, SCate olP1orida U
My coaunIaloa expires:
(NOT MY stAMP)' J": ~ - '" P......
. J . My ~ 00042ll6oS
, """.I EJcpImo JoIy 27 2005
2
~
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 27 of 78
STATEMENT OF UTIi..ITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REOUEST
I. NAME OF APPLICANT: Wilson Blvd. Center PUD
2 MAILING ADDRESS: c/o William L. Hoover, Managing Member, Wilson Blvd. Center LLC
Hoover Planning and Development, Inc.
3785 Airport Road North, Suite B-1
CITY Naples
S TATE Florida
ZIP 34105
3 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): The subject property is
located at the southeast comer of Wilson Blvd. and Golden Gate Blvd.
4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION-
Section: 10
Township: 49 South
Range: 27 East
Lot-
Block:
Subdivision:
Plat Book 7
Page #: 71 & 72 Property 1.D.#:
Metes & Bounds Description: All of Tract 17 and the west half of Tract 18 less the north 75 feet for
Golden Gate Boulevard right-of-way, Goldep Gate Estates Unit 13, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 71
and 72 of the Public Records or Collier County, Florida.
6.
5 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED (Check applicable system):
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM . 0
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM D
c. FRANCInSED UTILITY SYSlEM . D
PROVIDE NAME
d. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT D
(GPD capacity)
e. SEPTIC SYSTEM ~
TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED:
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL)
o
B
~
11/1312001 APPLICA nON FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR PUD RE-ZONE
PUD~2003-AJl-3585
PROJECT #2003010010
DATE: 1/13/03
" FRED REISCHL
. ..
.,.
7.
8.
9.
,-
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 28 of 78
TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED: 10,892 gpd@154 gpd!capita=70 captia
PEAK AND A WRAGE DAILY DEMANDS:
A. WATER-PEAK 30.2 gpm AVERAGE DAILY 10,892 gpd
B. SEWER-PEAK 24.2 gpm ' AVERAGE DAILY 9,077 gpd
IF' PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL
WATER SYSTEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE
REQUIRED: N.A.
10.
NARRATIVE STATEMENT: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic
drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the
method of affiuent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation
data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional
engineer.
11.
COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the project is located
within the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized
statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water
distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the
construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at
the at time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system
development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to
the issuance of building permits by the County. if applicable, the statement shall contain shall
contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and
sewer systems.
... ~,
12.
STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS: Unless
waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive
sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from
that provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided.
'Utility Provilloa Statemeat RJ,M 10f17/97
12/1312002 APPLlCA nON FOR PUBLIC BEARING FOR PUn RE-ZONE
C)I.OCO " " , II ;& a . ,
r--or-- II . . ;
~o_
.N 0 ..q- ""
o -0') :; :;
Z~N IZ
E>.Q) I; z
Q)CilOl wQ
:=~8:. '3'N ....!(
;;;0
Cil 9
"0 II a
c
Q)
Ol
<
III II R ;$ JI 0-
Il 1/
R II II .
<(
!! !! :! ~ l:! :: ~
W
.....
-
lIWh3'1TlOII NOn\\ 0lIV1\3'1f1Oll NDS'lIIt. (J)
l II
! ! ;f ! I II Ii !
II !! !i
i !Ii
'M"N .lS1 i
I !!
..... ~ N
:; :;
.. .. 2
" ~
II 9 !! !! . .. !: l!
" "
"-GL_ I ~
-
" t I. I.
Ii. ~11i 1l=1i :l j!j
j!j Ii Iii filii I'
I I ~-
. I.
I I t :l
. . .--- ::=Ii ::
Ii. S~ "Iii b~ I
t:I JIll
I II Iii I w-
~!(
IJI I I ~o
I~ t
'\ .:JI;I Ie II
!!!11i !!
=.- R1i ~;I~ ;>; Iii ~ii ~ I
Illili I I ,Ii
-....... -....
- ---
t I. t " " ~I
Ii" .. Sa Ii
"Iii "Iii llllj "Iii Ii I
I ! I I I I
t I t III
II II II "'Ii i "Iii :>11i II
I I I I
I ~ ~ !~ !! ~: III
!! Ii! lI; . : i = :1
I . ..
10
CD
10
C')
I
0::'
<
,
C')
o
o
N
~a:1
z
o
l-
i::
w
a..
0-
<(
~
z
o
-
.....
<(
()
o
-'
I
I
~
Id~ ·
lIil!1 If
! ill.' I! I
~;.!I ~ II
11"1' ~e ~
i.I.~1 ;111
:!I;;I ~ II
.ill
. ';i!: I
~i 1l~11. P
I I · 3
q~ ~~ il-
1111 Uill I , I
..
1:;11111
III I I" ii i:! I J ~
I I I Ii 1:1:,11 I ~ I,
!~S 3 I~PII'.
I g 111.li'
;Ullll; III i~: II-I~ Ii
II.. .Ii, I iii. J
... fol .. ~ "
=
I
I
IO!~ II!
I 'II -
I~-I.I
Ii 1!I:n
II ~i i I ~
!I i! 0- I
51
.. .._.. "" _... il! I
_..__.~_..._.._..._..~~~ ... "'tflt- '2.Il,I'" I'
.. .... .... ... ... ...
_...- .. .. ..-ij
-- ~~~ ~
____ I
..;;;..:;::.....- - - - - .
~~" -I '
_____________.::.-'.. r- I !
I !
e , .. .
~ I !
___ I !
------r---.. - ...
, ,! IIS-. II
t ...... . 1.1i IIIII g
~i i 'i'~1 II Ie 1111'
r!- _" ~! 1!~:li .i II~: I'll II
T I dl---"T---~i - _JI!- III
'I II ">> :2 r -
1lI I I 51 it: ~ 8 I I
\,: : II =1 - I I
J IH' .. ~ I j I
I.i'.:::.: :.=_____ --- I
_...0"",.
II
f
/
,.
~
II
I
......
I
.... i.
~ t/ I'
z * -I :!
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 31 of 78
ORDINANCE NO. 05- _
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-
41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY FWRIDA LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE, WInCH INCLUDES THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FWRIDA,
BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP
NUMBERED GGE05E AND BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY FROM "PUD" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS THE WILSON BOULEVARD
CENTER PUD FOR PROPERTY WCA TED ON THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF GOLDEN GA TE BOULEVARD
AND WILSON BOULEVARD WITIllN A NEIGHBORHOOD
CENTER OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, LOCATED IN
SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 7.15 ::I:
ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE
NUMBER 2000-72, THE FORMER WILSON BOULEVARD
CENTER PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, William J. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover Planning and Development, Inc.,
representing Wilson Boulevard Center LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to
change the zoning classification of the herein described real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County, Florida that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 10,
Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida., is changed from "PUD" to "PUD"
Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit
"A", which is incotpOrated herein and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas
Map numbered GGE05E, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier
County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
Ordinance Number 2000-72, known as the Wilson Boulevard Center PUD, adopted on
November 14,2000, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed
in its entirety.
SECTION THREE:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State.
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 32 of 78
County, Florida, this _ day of
,2005.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
ATTEST:
DWIGIIT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to Form and
Legal Sufficiency
Patrick G. White
Assistant County Attorney
PUDZ-2003-AR.3S8SIMDIIp
2
Agenda Item No, 17B
May 10,2005
Page 33 of 78
WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER CPUD
A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING THE WILSON BOULEVARD
CENTER CPUD, A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF
THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
PREPARED FOR:
WILLIAM L. HOOVER, MANAGING MEMBER
WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER, LLC
3785 AIRPORT ROAD N., SUITE B-1
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105
PREPARED BY:
WILLIAM L. HOOVER, AICP
HOOVER PLANNING & DEV., INC.
3785 AIRPORT ROAD N., SUITE B-1
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105
and
RICHARD D. YOV ANOVICH
GOODLETTE, COLEMAN & JOHNSON, P .A.
4001 TAMIAMI TRAIL N., SUITE 300
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103
DATE FILED January 6. 2003
DATE REVISED April 21. 2005
DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC April 21. 2005
DATE APPROVED BY BCC
ORDINANCE NUMBER 00-72
AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL
EXHIBIT "A"
Agenda Item No. 176
May 10, 2005
Page 34 of 78
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF EXHIBITS
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION
ii
1
2
SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
4
SECTION III COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN
SECTION IV DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
7
14
EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT "B"
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 35 of 78
LIST OF EXHIBITS
CPUD MASTER PLAN
LOCATION MAP
ii
Agenda Item No, 178
May 10, 2005
Page 36 of 78
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The development of approximately 7.15 acres of property in Collier County, as a
Commercial Planned Unit Development to be known as the Wilson Boulevard Center
CPUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as
set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The commercial facilities of
the Wilson Boulevard Center CPUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land
development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for the
following reasons:
1. The subject property is within the Neighborhood Center of the Estates-Mixed Use
Designation as identified on the Future Land Use Map and as described in the
Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan permits
commercial land uses in this area. There are numerous criteria for Neighborhood
Centers and this CPUD is consistent with them.
2. The Project development is compatible and complementary to existing and future
surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element.
3. The Project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations
including the Growth Management Plan.
4. All final local development orders for this Project are subject to Section 6.02.00
Adequate Public Facilities Requirements, of the Collier County Land
Development Code as set forth in Objective 1.2 of the Golden Gate Area Master
Plan.
5. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with all applicable sections,
including environmental sections, of the Collier County Land Development Code
as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element.
6. The project is located within a wellfield protection zone and the project
development is planned to protect the functioning of these natural groundwater
aquifer recharge areas as described in Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub-
Element of the Public Facilities Element and Objective 3.1 of the Conservation
and Coastal Management Element.
1
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 37 of 78
SECTION I
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the
property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be
developed under the Project name of Wilson Boulevard Center CPUD.
1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The subject property being 7.15 acres, is comprised of 3 contiguous parcels, and
is located in Section 10, Township 49 South, and Range 27 East. The legal
description of the subject property is:
All of Tract 17 and the west half of Tract 18 less the north 75 feet for Golden
Gate Boulevard right-of-way, Golden Gate Estates Unit 13, as recorded in Plat
Book 7, Pages 71 and 72 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
The subject property is owned by William L. Hoover, Managing Member of
Wilson Boulevard Center, LLC, 3785 Airport Road North, Suite B-1, Naples,
Florida 34105.
1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA
A. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Wilson
Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard (unincorporated Collier County),
Florida.
B. The property is currently vacant and is zoned PUD. It is proposed to be
rezoned to CPUD for low intensity transitional commercial land uses,
convenience commercial land uses, and intermediate commercial land
uses.
1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
The Project is located within the Golden Gate Drainage Basin according to the
Collier County Drainage Atlas. The proposed outfall for the Project is to an
existing Wilson Boulevard swale along the western boundary of the Project.
Natural ground elevation varies from 12.7 to 13.6 NGVD and the entire site is
located within FEMA Flood Zone "X" with no base flood elevation specified.
2
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 10, 2005
Page 38 of 78
The water management system of the Project will be permitted by Collier County.
All rules and regulations of SFWMD will be imposed upon this Project including
but not limited to: storm attenuation with a peak discharge rate per Collier County
and SFWMD Rules, minimum roadway centerline, perimeter berm and finished
floor elevations, and water quality pre-treatment. The water management system
of the Project proposes the construction of a perimeter berm with crest elevation
set at or above the 25-year, 3-day peak flood stage. Water quality pre-treatment
will be accomplished by an on-site retention system prior to discharge into the
Wilson Boulevard swale.
Per the Collier County Soil Legend dated January 1990, the soil types found
within the limits of the property are #14 - Pineda Fine Sand and #21 - Boca Fine
Sand.
The site was historically a hydric pine f1atwoods with scattered cypress. The site
is dominated by slash pines, cabbage palms, and cypress. The ground cover is
dominated by vines with scattered pockets of swamp fern and palmettos.
1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Wilson Boulevard Center CPUD will include a mixture of retail and office
land uses with a common architectural theme in a rural-type setting. Floor area
for these uses shall not exceed 42,000 square feet.
The Master Plan is illustrated graphically on Exhibit "A," CPUD Master Plan. A
Land Use Summary indicating approximate land use acreage is shown on the
plan.
1.7 SHORT TITLE
This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Wilson Boulevard Center
Commercial Planned Unit Development Ordinance."
3
Agenda Item No, 178
May 10,2005
Page 39 of 78
SECTION "
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
2.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project
plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the
respective land uses of the tracts included in the Project, as well as other Project
relationships.
2.2 GENERAL
A. Regulations for development of the Wilson Boulevard Center CPUD shall
be in accordance with the contents of this document, CPUD-Commercial
Planned Unit Development District, applicable sections and parts of the
Collier County Land Development Code and Collier County Growth
Management Plan in effect at the time of local final development order or
building permit application. Where these regulations fail to provide
developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in
the Collier County Land Development Code shall apply.
B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as
the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in
effect at the date of adoption of this CPUD.
C. All conditions imposed and graphic material presented depicting
restrictions for the development of the Wilson Boulevard Center CPUD
shall become part of the regulations, which govern the manner in which
the CPUD site may be developed.
D. Unless specifically waived through any variance or waiver provisions from
any other applicable regulations, the provisions of those regulations not
otherwise provided for in this CPUD remain in full force and effect.
E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a
concurrency review under the provisions of Section 6.02.00 Adequate
Public Facilities Requirements of the Collier County Land Development
Code (LDC) at the earliest, or next, to occur of either Final Site
Development Plan approval, Final Plat approval, or building permit
issuance applicable 'to this development.
4
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 10, 2005
Page 40 of 78
2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES
A. The Project Master Plan is illustrated graphically by Exhibit "A," CPUD
Master Plan.
B. Minor modifications to Exhibit "A," may be permitted at the time of Site
Development Plan approval, subject to the provisions of Section 10.02.13
E. of the Collier County Land Development Code or as otherwise
permitted by this CPU D Document.
C. In addition to the various areas and specific items shown in Exhibit "A,"
easements such as utility, private, semi-public shall be established and/or
vacated within or along the property, as may be necessary.
2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Exhibit "A," CPUD Master Plan, constitutes the required CPUD
Development Plan. Except as otherwise provided within this CPUD
Document, any division of the property and the development of the land
shall be in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations and the platting
laws of the State of Florida.
B. The provisions of Section 10.02.03 Site Development Plans of the Land
Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all
platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided in said Section 10.02.03 in
effect prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development
order.
C. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructural
improvements regarding any dedications and the methodology for
providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities.
2.5 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN
Amendments may be made to the CPUD as provided in Section 10.02.13 E. of
the Land Development Code.
2.6 PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE
Whenever the developer elects to create land area and/or amenities whose
ownership and maintenance responsibility is a common interest to all of the
subsequent purchasers of property within said development in which the
common interest is located, that developer entity shall provide appropriate legal
instruments for the establishment of a Property Owners Association whose
function shall include provisions for the perpetual care and maintenance of all
5
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 41 of 78
common facilities and open space including the 5-foot high wall and school bus
stop facility provided by the developer. These developer commitments will be
enforced through provisions agreed to and included in the declaration of
covenants and restrictions or similar recorded instrument. Such provisions must
be enforceable by lot owners against the developer, its successors and assigns,
regardless of turnover or not to any Property Owners Association.
6
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 42 of 78
SECTION III
COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN
3.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the
commercial areas as shown on Exhibit "A," CPUD Master Plan.
3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Commercial areas designated on the CPUD Master Plan are intended to provide
both retail and office uses with a common architectural theme in a rural-type
setting. Floor area for these uses shall not exceed 42,000 square feet.
3.3 PERMITTED USES
No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land
used, in whole or part, for other than the following:
A. Permitted Princioal Uses and Structures:
(1) Apparel and accessory stores (groups 5611 - 5661).
(2) Automobile supply stores (group 5531 but only the sale of new auto
supplies and no on-site installation).
(3) Business services (groups 7311,7334 - 7336,7377,7378,7384).
(4) Child day care services (group 8351).
(5) Depository institutions (groups 6021-6062).
(6) Eating places (group 5812 except for fast food restaurants and
restaurants with a drive-through. This shall not preclude cafes,
dairy bars, ice cream stands, pizzerias, sandwich shops, soda
fountains, and submarine shops). On Consumption of alcoholic
beverages on premises shall be subject to Section 5.05.01 of the
Land Development Code.
(7) Engineering, accounting, and bookkeeping services (groups 8713,
8721).
(8) Food stores (groups 5411 excluding convenience stores, 5421 -
5499),
7
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 43 of 78
(9) General merchandise stores (group 5399).
(10) Hardware supplies (groups 5231 - 5251).
(11) Health services (groups 8011 - 8049).
(12) Home furniture, furnishings and equipment stores (groups 5714,
5719,5734,5735).
(13) Insurance carriers, agents, and brokers (groups 6311 - 6399,
6411 ) .
(14) Legal services (group 8111).
(15) Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912, 5941 - 5948, 5992).
(16) Motion pictures (groups 7832 but only in conjunction with a sit-
down restaurant and 7841).
(17) Personal services (groups 7212,7221 -7251,7291).
(18) Physica I fitness facilities (group 7991).
(19) Real estate (group 6531).
(20) United States Postal Service (group 4311 except major distribution
center).
(21) Veterinary services (group 0742 for household pets only and no
outside kenneling or overnight boarding).
(22) Any other commercial use or professional service, which is
comparable in nature with the foregoing uses.
8, Accessory Uses:
Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the Permitted
Uses within this PUD Document, except drive-through facilities, are limited
only to banks with a maximum of three (3) drive-through lanes per bank.
C. Prohibited Permitted Uses:
(1) Drinking places (group 5813) and liquor stores (group 5921).
8
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 44 of 78
(2) Mail order houses (group 5961) and merchandising machine
operators (group 5962).
(3) Power laundries (group 7211) and funeral service and crematories
(group 7261).
(4) Radio and television representatives (group 7313) and direct mail
advertising services (group 7331).
(5) Amusement and recreation services (group 7999).
(6) General, specialty, and psychiatric hospitals (groups 8062, 8063,
8069).
(7) Educational services (groups 8211 - 8231).
(8) Correctional institutions (group 9223).
(9) Environmental resource and solid waste management (group
9511 ).
(10) Homeless shelters and soup kitchens.
(11) Gasoline service stations (group 5541).
(12) Refuse systems, including hazardous materials (group 4953).
3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Minimum Lot Area:
Ten thousand (10,000) square feet.
B. Minimum Lot Width:
One hundred (100) feet.
C. Minimum Yards:
(1) Principal structures:
(a) Front Yard - Twenty-five (25) feet.
(b) Side Yard - Fifteen (15) feet.
(c) Rear Yard - Fifteen (15) feet.
9
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 45 of 78
(2) Accessory Structures:
Setbacks shall be as required by Section 4.02.03 of the Land
Development Code in effect at time of building permit application.
D. Minimum Distance Between Principal Structures:
Fifteen (15) feet.
E. Minimum Floor Area:
Seven hundred (700) square feet for the principal structure on the first
habitable floor.
F. Maximum Heiaht:
Thirty-five (35) feet and one (1 )-story.
G. Off-Street Parkina and Loadina Reauirements:
As required by Division 4.05.00 of the Land Development Code in effect at
the time of building permit application.
H. Open Space Reauirements:
(1) A minimum of thirty (30) percent open space of the 6,43 acres
remaining after subtracting land that is within the Golden Gate
Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard rights-of-way shall be devoted to
open space, as described in Section 4.07.02 G.3. of the Land
Development Code.
(2) A minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the 6.43 acres remaining after
subtracting land that is within the Golden Gate Boulevard and
Wilson Boulevard rights-of-way shall be devoted to natural habitat
preserve area, as described in Section 3.05.07 of the Land
Development Code.
(3) A functional public open-space component shall be provided. Such
public open-space shall be developed as green space within a
pedestrian-accessible courtyard, as per Section 4.06.03 B.3. of the
Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of
this PUD approval.
I. Landscap;na and Bufferina Reauirements:
10
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 46 of 78
(1) A twenty-five (25)-foot wide buffer shall be provided along both
Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. This buffer shall
contain two (2) staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no
more than thirty (30) feet on-center, and a double row hedge at
least two (2) feet in height at time of planting and attaining a
minimum of three (3) feet height within one (1) year, A minimum of
fifty (50) percent of the twenty-five (25)-foot wide buffer area shall
be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers
other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this
twenty-five (25)-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer
requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained,
where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water
retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in
natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area
shall be allowed, if necessary, to reach an external outfall.
(2) Where this CPUD directly abuts residential property zoned E-
Estates and without an approved conditional use a minimum
seventy-five (75) feet buffer shall be provided in which no parking
uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer
along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum
of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native
vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07H. of the
Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native
vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be
used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm
shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.05.07H. of the LDC
(native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to
be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention
area for water management purposes shall meet the following
criteria:
(a) There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation
being retained. The additional water directed to this area
shall not increase the annual hydro-period unless it is proven
that such would have no adverse impact to the existing
vegetation.
(b) If the Project requires permitting by the South Florida Water
Management District, the Project shall provide a letter or
official document from the District indicating that the native
vegetation within the retention area will not have to be
removed to comply with water management requirements. If
the District cannot, or will not, supply such a letter, then the
11
Agenda Item No, 178
May 10,2005
Page 47 of 78
native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water
management.
(c) If the project is reviewed by Collier County for water
management permitting, the County engineer shall provide
evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary
to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water
management area.
(3) A five-foot high wall shall be constructed on the commercial side of
the required landscape buffer between this CPUD and the adjacent
residential use to the south and such wall shall be continued
northward twenty-five feet from its most eastern point. Such wall
shall have a brick and/or stone finish facing away from this CPUD.
J. Sians:
Signs shall be permitted as described in Section 5.06.00 of the Collier
County Land Development Code.
K. Solid Waste:
Trash receptacles shall be screened on three (3) sides by a six (6) to eight
(8) foot high opaque masonry wall or fence with an opaque gate on the
remaining side for access.
L. Liahtina:
All lighting facilities shall be architecturally-designed, and shall be limited
to a maximum height of twenty-five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall
be shielded from neighboring residential land uses.
M. Architectural Buildina Desian:
(1) The Project shall meet all applicable standards of Division 5.05.08
Architectural Standards for Commercial Buildings and Projects.
(2) All buildings shall have tile roofs, "Old Florida" style metal roofs, or
decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall
have an "Old Florida" architectural style and be finished in light,
subdued colors, except for decorative trim.
(3) Pedestrian traffic shall be encouraged through the placement of
sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within
parking areas. Walkways or courtyards shall connect adjacent
12
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 48 of 78
buildings. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of
sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood
Center is created.
N. Common Architectural Theme:
All buildings within this CPUD shall utilize a common architectural theme
and be set by the architectural theme shown on the first Site Development
Plan approved within this CPUD. This theme shall meet the design
standards described in Section 3.4M.(2) of this CPUD Document and shall
be applicable to both building design and signage. Bank drive-through
areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the bank building.
O. Time Limitations for the Main Multi-Tenant Retail and Office Buildina(s)
The main multi-tenant retail and office building(s) shall be limited in hours
open to the public from 6:00 AM. to 10:00 P.M. for Sundays through
Thursdays and from 6:00 A.M. to 11 :00 P.M. for Fridays and Saturdays.
This shall not apply during Collier County designated "Hurricane
Warnings" or to drugstores.
13
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 49 of 78
SECTION IV
DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
4.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for the development of
this Project.
4.2 GENERAL
All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with Final Site Development
Plans, Final Subdivision Plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes,
and regulations applicable to this CPUD. Except where specifically noted or
stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the official County Land
Development Code shall apply to this Project even if the land within the CPUD is
not to be platted. The Developer, his successor and assigns, shall be
responsible for the commitments outlined in this document.
The Developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the CPUD Master Plan
and the regulations of this CPUD as adopted and any other conditions or
modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition,
any successor or assignee in title shall be subject to any commitments within this
agreement.
4.3 PUD MASTER PLAN
A Exhibit "A," PUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is
conceptual in nature except that applicant shall be committed to the
Natural Habitat Preserve Areas as shown on the CPUD Master Plan.
Proposed area, lot or land use boundaries, or special land use boundaries
shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent
approval phase such as Final Platting or Site Development Plan approval.
Subject to the provisions of Section 10.02.13 E. of the Collier County Land
Development Code, amendments may be made from time to time as long
as not in conflict with the Growth Management Plan.
B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be
granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service
utilities and all common areas in the Project.
4.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT
14
Agenda Item No, 178
May 10, 2005
Page 50 of 78
A Site Development Plan shall be submitted per County regulations in effect at
time of site plan submittal. The Project is expected to be developed in one (1) or
two (2) phases.
A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the time
limits pursuant to Section 10.02.13 D. of the Land Development Code.
B. Monitorina Reoort: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted
pursuant to Section 10.02.13 F. of the Collier County Land Development
Code.
4.5 ENGINEERING
A. Except as otherwise provided within this CPUD Document, this Project
shall be required to meet all County Ordinances in effect at the time final
construction documents are submitted for development approval.
B. If the Property is subdivided into three (3) or more parcels, a plat shall be
required.
4.6 PLANNING
A. Pursuant to Section 2.03.07 E. of the Land Development Code, if during
the course of site clearing I excavation or other construction activity a
historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the
minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately
stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted.
4.7 ENVIRONMENTAL
A. Pursuant to Section 10.02.06 C. of the Land Development Code, the
petitioner shall implement an exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and
maintenance (exotic free) plan for the subject property. This maintenance
plan shall be implemented on a yearly basis at a minimum.
B. This CPUD shall be consistent with the Environmental Section of the
Collier County Growth Management Plan Conservation and Coastal
Management Element and the Collier County Land Development Code at
the time of final development order approval.
C. This CPUD shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission (FFWCC) regarding potential impacts to
protected species onsite, A Habitat Management Plan for those protected
15
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 10, 2005
Page 51 of 78
species shall be submitted to Environmental Review staff for review and
approval prior to final Site Plan/Construction Plan approval.
D. All conservation areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation
tracts or easements on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the
plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the
Florida Statutes. Setbacks and buffers shall be provided in accordance
with Section 3.05.07 of the Collier County Land Development Code.
E. In the event the CPUD does not require platting, all conservation areas
shall be recorded as conservation/preservation tracts or easements
dedicated on the plat to the project's commercial property owners
association or like entity for ownership and maintenance responsibility and
to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance.
F. If the vegetation in the preserve area does not survive due to inundation of
water, this area will be re-planted with native water tolerant species with a
plan approved by Environmental Review staff.
4.8 UTILITIES
A Since the project site is not presently within a County or other authorized
water and sewer service area, thus not serviced with centrally provided
water and sewer, the project shall utilize well and septic systems until it is
within an authorized water and sewer service area and central water and
sewer are available.
4.9 TRANSPORTATION
A All work within Collier County rights-of-way or public easements shall
require a Right-of-Way permit.
B. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided at all access points. Access
lighting must be in place prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy (CO).
C. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings and design criteria
shall be in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT)
Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FOOT
Design Standards, current edition, and the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (MUTCD), current edition. All other improvements shall
be consistent with, and as required by, the Collier County Land
Development Code (LDC).
16
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 10, 2005
Page 52 of 78
D. Site-related improvements necessary for safe ingress and egress to this
project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact
fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to
the public prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
E. Road Impact Fees shall be paid in accordance with Collier County
Ordinance 01-13, as amended, and Division 6.02.00 of the LDC.
F. All proposed median openings shall be in accordance with the Collier
County Access Management Policy (Resolution 01-247), as it may be
amended, and the LDC, as it may be amended. Collier County reserves
the right to modify or close any median opening existing at the time of
approval of this CPUD which is found to be adverse to the health, safety
and welfare of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on, but
are not limited to, safety, operational circulation, and roadway capacity.
G. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of
a right-in/right-out condition at any access point. Neither will the existence
of a point of ingress, a point of egress or a median opening, nor the lack
thereof, be the basis for any future cause of action for damages against
Collier County by the developer, its successor in title, or assignee.
H. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks, and
interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and
maintained by an entity created by the developer and Collier County shall
have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities.
I. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of an existing
County right-of-way or easement, compensating right-of-way, shall be
provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such
improvement.
J. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic
control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public
right-of-way or easement is determined to be necessary, the cost of such
improvement shall be borne by the developer and shall be paid to Collier
County before the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
K. The developer shall provide a school bus stop in the Wilson Boulevard
right-of-way prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy being issued for any
buildings unless the Collier County School Board does not approve this
bus stop or permitting this bus stop becomes unfeasible.
4.10 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
17
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 53 of 78
Maximum allowable discharge rates shall be per Ordinance No. 90-10, as
amended.
18
HOOVER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Rezonings, PUDs, ConditioN' Uses, Variances, Plan Amendments,
TraffIC, Parking, & Land 'Use Studies, Site Planning & Subdi,isiollS
0.178
.2005
of 78
April 1, 2003
See Engineer's Sign & Seal on Signature Page
RE: Trame Impact Study for the WlbOD Boulevard Center POO AmeDdmeDt,
Loaated at the Southeast Comer of WU.OD Blvd. aDd Golden Gate Blvd., in
CoUier Couaty, Florida
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The subject property is located at the SB comer of Wilson Blvd. and Golden Gate Blvd.
and 5 acres of the 6.43-acre site was previously approved for commercial land uses. The
site is within an area designated as a Neighborhood Center on the Golden Gate Area
Master Plan. The site was previously limited to a maximum of 42,000 sq. ft. of retaiVoffice
uses and this PUD Amendment does not propose any changes to those limits or the land
uses. The project is expected to be fully built and occupied by 2005.
After adjusting for pass-by traffic per the m's TriJ' Generation Handbook. the project was
estimated to generate, based on category "Shopping Center (820)", 48 A.M. Peak Hours
trips, 177 P.M. Peak Hour trips, and 1952 Weekday Daily trips. All of the key roadways
within the project's RDI are currently at LOS B and by 2005, even with the project's traffic
included, all roadways within the project's RDI are projected to be at LOS B or LOS C.
The project's traffic will not lower the LOS on any key roadway within its RDI nor lower
the LOS on the Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard sigratllind intersection.
During the A.M. Peak Hour this signalized intersection is currently at LOS C and is
projected to remain at LOS C in 2005, even with the project's traffic included. Owing the
P.M. Peak Hour this Sigra9Ji~ intersection is currently at LOS B and is projected to
remain at LOS Bin 2005, including the project's traffic.
INTRODucnON
Five acres of the 6.43-acre site were previously approved for commercial development.
The project is located at the southeast comer of the intersection between Wilson Blvd. and
Golden Oate Blvd. (see map labeled Exhibit 1). The subject property is located within an
area designated asa Neighborhood Center on the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The site
is proposed with accesses onto both Wilson Blvd. and Golden Oate Blvd. The Wilson
Boulevard Center PUD was previously approved for a commercial center with a maximum
of 42,000 sq. ft. Build-out and full occupancy of the project is expected in 200S.
TRIP GENERATION
The ITE's 6th Edition of Trip Generation was utilized to estimate the number of trips.
Category "Shopping Center (820)" was used to estimate the maximum of 42,000 square
feet of projected commercial area based on gross leasing area. The "Fitted Curve
Equation" was used, as requested by Collier County Transportation Services.
Kt:-:sutsMIII AL
PUDZ-2003-AR-3S85
.~ PROJECT #2003010010
DATE: 9/18/03
FRED REISCBL
3785 Airport Rotul North, Suite B-1, Naples, Florida 34105 · Phone: 239740f.S89V'''7aX': 239..4UJ-Y(J(JY
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 55 of 78
SHOPPING CENTER (820) - 42.000 Sa. 'to (Balled on 1.000 So. Ft G.LA.l
Fonnula - Number ofTriDs Del'Time Period(x= 42) Enterl%)/Exitf%)
Ln(T)=.643 Ln(x) + 5.866 = 3902 Weekday Daily Trips 1951(5001'0)11951(50%)
Ln(T) =.596 Ln(x) +2.329 = 9S Wkdy. AM PK HR of Adj. S1. 58{61 %)/37(3golO)
Ln(T) =.660 Ln(x) + 3.403 = 354 Wkdy. PM PK HR of Adj. St 170(48%)1184(52%)
ADJUSTMENT FOR PASS-BY TRIPS
Since the 6th Edition of Trip Generation does not go into passer-by trips, the ITE's TriR
Generation Handbook (March 2001) was utilized. The commercial center's trips were
reduced by 50.07% (rounded to 500.4) to reflect passer-by trips based on the equation
within Figure 5.5 of that book for shopping centers during Weekday P.M. Peak Hour. More
specifically, the equation {Ln(T) - .291 Ln{x) + 5.001} shows a reduction of 50.07%
(rounded to 500.10) for the P.M. Peak Hour and this figure was utilized for the A.M. Peak
Hour and Weekday Daily Traffic also. The adjustments are shown below.
PROJECT'S ADmSTED TRIPS
After Adjustment for Pass-by Trip,
3902 x .5 = 1952 Weekday Daily Trips
95 x .5 = 48 Weekday. AM PK HR of Adj. St
354 x.5 = 177 Weekday PM PKHR of Adj. S1.
Enter(% l/Exit(%)
976(500At )1976(500A.)
29(61 %)119(39%)
85{48%)I92(52%)
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The project's trips were distributed based on dwelling unit counts within Traffic Analysis
Zones (T AZ) of the project's trade area. A map showing the trade area for the project is
attached as Exhibit 2. The nwnber of dwelling units in each T AZ were first put on a list
and were based on the 2001 dwelling unit COWlts as of March 31, 2001 (data was obtained
from Long Range Planning). After totaling all of the dwelling units in the trade area, a
ratio of the dwelling units within each T AZ compured to those within the entire trade area
was computed. for each T AZ. The ratios were rounded to the nearest full percentage point.
The traffic within each T AZ was assigned to the closest major roadway serving each T AZ.
The project's cumulative trip distribution was then determined by having the traffic utilize
the most likely route to and from the site (see Exhibit 3). The project's weekday entering
trips are shown on Exhibit 4 and the project's weekday exiting trips are shown on Exhibit
5. The project's total traffic is shown on Exhibit 6. These exhibits show the project's
A.M. Peak Hour trips, P.M. Peak Hour trips, and Weekday Daily trips.
RADIUSOFDEVELOPMENTI~ACT
Exhibit 7 shows the greater of the proposed project's A.M. or P.M. Peak Hour trips and
what percentage those trips comprise of the applicable roadway segment's LOS C traffic at
Peak Hour. The RDI was based upon the COWlty'S detennination that the RDI for a
proposed commercial PUD Rezoning of this size is any arterial roadway within 2 to 4 miles
of the subject site where the project's trips exceed 1% of LOS C for that roadway segment.
Exhibit 7 reveals that the proposed project's RDI is: Golden Gate Boulevard, between 1
mile east of Collier Boulevard (project's western trade boundary) and Everglades
Boulevard; Wilson Boulevard, between Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Boulevard; and
Everglades Boulevard, within the project's trade area.
I
3
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10. 2005
Page 56 of 78
METHODOLOGY
The Annual Average Daily Traffic numbers (AAD1) were based on Collier County's
"Counts and Projections 2001". Peak Season Daily Traffic numbers (pSDT) were
computed by multiplying the MDT by the PSDT/AADT ratio or seasonal factor. These
ratios are shown on Exhibit 8. Traffic figures beyond 2001 were projected by anrwaJly
increasing the traffic on each roadway by 8%.
EXISTING TRAF'FI~ IN 2~
The cUITeDt traffic volumes for each roadway and their LOS are shown on Exhibit 9. All of
the major roadway segments within the project's RDI are at LOS B during both MDT and
PSDT in 2003.
FUTURE TRAFFIC IN 200s
Exhibit 10 shows that all key roadways within the project's Radius of Development Impact
during Peale Season Daily Traffic will be at LOS B or LOS C at the time of the project's
build-out in 2005. Additionally, the project's traffic during Peak Season Daily Traffic will
not lower the LOS on any roadway within the project's RDI.
~RSECTIO.N ANALYSES
The project's directional traffic movements, for both the A.M. and P.M: Peak Hours. at its
access points onto Wilson Boulevard, Golden Gate Boulevard, and the intersection of those
2 roadways is depicted in the Appendix.
SipJized Analvses at ~e Int~ion of 0014en Gate Boulevard and WilJon Boulevard
Intersection counts were manually taken at the subject intersection on March 4,2003,
during both the A.M. and P.M. Peak Hours (the count summaries are attached within the
Appendix). Since these counts were taken in prime season they were considered Peak
Season counts. To project future traffic these traffic counts were increased annually by 8%.
The intersection analyses were performed using HCS 2000 software.
The 7:00 A.M. to 8:00 A.M time frame was determined to be the A.M. Peak Hour. For
the A.M. Peak Hour in 2003, the intersection was determined to be at LOS C with an
average interseCtion delay per vehicle of 21.4 seconds (see Exhibit 11). The developer of
the subject project would be adding a northbound left-turn lane at the time of site
development and this additional lane was included for all 2005 analyses. For the A.M.
Peak Hour in 2005, both with and without the project's traffic. the intersection was
determined to be at illS C with an average intersection delay per vehicle of 27.0 seconds
(see Exhibits 12 and 13).
The 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM time frame was determined to be the PM Peak Hour. For the
P.M. Peak Hour in 2003, the intersection was determined to be at LOS B with an average
intersection delay per vehicle of IS.3 seconds (see Exhibit 14). As previously mentioned.
the developer of the subject project would be adding a northbound left-turn lane at the time
of site development and this additional lane was included for ail 2005 analyses. For the
P.M. Peak Hour in 2005. without the project's traffic. the intersection was determined to be
at LOS B with an average intersection delay per vehicle of 17.6 seconds (see Exhibit 15).
4
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10. 2005
Page 57 of 78
For the P.M. Peak Hour in 2005. with the project.s traffic included, the intersection was
determined to remain at LOS B with an average intersection delay per vehicle ot 18.9
seconds (see (Exhibit 16).
Un-silPlalized Analvses at the PrQject.s Access onto Wilson Boulevard
These un-signalized intersection analyses were based on the traffic counts just obtained and
then increased annually by 8%. The existing traffic on Wilson Boulevard was based on the
projected traffic heading north to and south from the intersection of Wilson Boulevard and
Golden Gate Boulevard for the 2005 peak hours. Exhibit 17 shows that all turning
movements at the projecfs access onto Wilson Boulevard in the A.M Peak Hour would be
at LOS A. Exhibit 18 also shows that all turning movements at the project.s access ont6
Wilson Boulevard in the P.M. Peak Hour would be at LOS A.
Un-sionalized Analvses at the Proiecfs Access onto Golden Gate Boulev8l'Q
These un-signalized intersection analyses were also based on the traffic counts just
obtained and then increased annually by 8%. The existing traffic on Golden Gate
Boulevard (at the project's access) was based on the projected traffic heading west to and
east from the intersection of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard for the 2005
peak hours. Exhibit 19 shows that aU turning movements at the project. s access onto
Golden Gate Boulevard in the A.M. Peak Hour would be at LOS A. Exhibit 20 shows that
all turning movements at the project.s access onto Golden Gate Boulevard in the P.M. Peak
Hour would be at LOS B.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMEND
1.3/1.4 Exhibits 9 and 10 show the LOS of all arterial roadways within the project's RDI
being at either WS B or LOS C.
4.4 Not applicable.
5.115.2 Not applicable since all roadway links within the project's RDI are at LOS B or
LOSC.
7.2 Not applicable since the properties to the south and east are zoned Estates and the
Comprehensive Plan requires a 75-foot wide buffer between the existing commercial uses
and those residential uses.
7.3 The project will meet the latest parking requirements within the LDC at the time of
SDP review and approval.
Prepared by:
HOOVERPLANNIN'O
Reviewed by:
DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC.
~~~
~y~
William 1. Hoover. AlCP
HPS File #328Atisl.rep
-Q2 ~ le ~
0_
NO 'pit :i
..J 'CO
Z~I.O ..L~
E >0) o~
O)l1:lOJ ..!.I
=::::2&:
l1:l .c:-
"0 .~ 0
c Q:::....
0) lOtS
OJ
<C K fII
'pAI8 Sti'POI '.J~3 ll) ~
.... ~
.... .2 ~
~ t~
I.i.l -~
51 'ti .s:~
,.... ::Ji.
as
:;;:
.g q)
....
~ ~
3N '~S 419t ~
~
3N 'IS ,,~g
'pIt/S UOS/IM i.l
oQe
~a:
'-
a...
- ~ l
.... ~
~ ~
;:t: i=:: ll) ....
f/)
~ (5 ~ :I
0 ~ 51
-.J E
.s as S!
.!
~ CiS
"
l.JJ ~ '-
Z*~ &
~
~ ~
:1. ifi .!
~ .E!
!
s
~
Exhibit 2
Projects Trade Area
i't_V~::~.f"
~ - J.rtF.~~!f~~'ff;~:~:J,i}:.:::\:~::::\~f~W~~'?
i ! ::J ':;:"~';li ;}~~i:~i;;~:: .:~~:~J
/>'?!'; .:, t;... c::t!:r;~f:~~ !r:3~~ftt!f~?~~~1
. ."h:-...-.IO....,i;.... . "...... . ..
:~;'j; tiiiiilt;,;,::;,':::':r~l~ilJ l;~~);
:".;',::';' <= ~;:;;~~':<.:.:::Y '.ti:;~.;~...~" :'.'~ ~'J ';'
i'~'{:'H:";'~::;: ?:; ,\;;/,:,;,;/<!/<-::~'~:; ~:~1::%,C~nl;;:\:;'
~,llf ~1{~~j;);I~~)I~ i~llif lillllli..1
-
~
a
~
-=
~
CJ
-
....
NN'U:$-M/OI(AUE ROotO
(C.R. 1Wl)
en
~
CJ
~~ I\!~
~ t~i{11
I,;.;.;,:",~,,';,;.,'i.,.:,:,',;,:,',:,!,~.:,..;~,;,:,(,:,:.1 ~;!~'1:\:~11ii:}~;i~;
1~~1
Subject Site
~~
~
~
Al.1IIM'Rllr ALLEY (sa. e.c.)
I'IltIIliTA'I(; - :IIi
:f~(;;: ;:",'. ;?,.~{:';\~';'\~~~~~/;
wl~il~:I~ ;~I~I;~lll;:~.
;~:~\"i;'~; ji~fi~lj~ I
: ~ ". '.. '. ~ . .
;:j'~~;;;..: i:!;:/ ;tW/\:~;~X!},:~;t)~ ~l{Qf~;~::'t(
.".,.1, .~ .,,,..~~~<.. '.,. ,. ,$,
Y?\'i'~(::;~i P/ Sb;#~,~:,iWi \;/f.;:\:u:rJ<
~11;~I~I~il~1
f~I~~R~~,ll~l~ ~
~ ~It~
1'<.:'.:".:'" "
7&
-
-
~
r:. ","
(OLl"lCO
_01'-
0_
NO
, -0
2;::(,0
E>-Q)
Q)('IJ0l
==:2&:
('IJ
"C
C
Q)
Ol
<(
3N 'JS 1.I~9l
~
as
.!
~
~
~
....""
.t.~
.Q e
~a.:
~
'--. t:::
~~ 3t
:S~
..., ~ij5 "t)
t- Gfg & ~
Oi :S
;t .Y>V) ....
I-- - ~ I CO
~ Ut::) -
~~ ~ ~
Oe: e
a: oS as
Q)
....
&
~ '-
w i
,z* ~
'pAt. J9!'JO::J
-=
~
} 'ti Q)
....
Cl:: I:)
....
Q) \;
01 ....
a: oS
Q)
,S
Q..
:::i
99/D'fOWW/
~
3t
..!..~
O~
I 1
:c-
,01 I:)
a:....
<5
lQ
en
Q) ~
.... u
.2 u
\;'C(
.... 0
.s~
O)Ll"lCO
!'-O""
..--0_
.N 0
o -..--
Z~(O
E >. (l)
(l)(1:lOJ
:!.:~&
(1:l
"0
C
(l)
OJ
<(
'pA'8 S~POI
S
:t:
I -
.... ,
01
I .
......t
.c:
.0\ 0
~....
~
~
In
ll) In
_ Cll
o (>
_ (>
(/!'<:C
~~
S'C..
<..>
k:: ~
L4: 0)' to' ~
~~~~
~a:)...
c;,,::s~~
~ ~ac-q:
'- ~:t::t:C)
i.li ~~)... "t)
s: ~l:S~~ ~
~ .Yl l:t: Cl (5 ....
.I It)
t;~~~ ~ ~
!.!J"" ~
C5 -::::- ~ 8- E Q5
oS
a: Cll
....
~
W ~
z*~ &
'pA'8 .J~!lJOJ
~
:11
~
ii5
:;;
.g
6
0:
"i
Q5
II)
-
~
3N .~s l/~9t i
~
~
"
~~~
-.....
(> (>
.!II.. -!!.
.ae
~o.:
~
-
tg6 '~rJ
lQ
~
.2
~
....
oS
:s
~~~
,0_
IN 0
.; -N
ZO(p
E';,Q.l
Q)(QOJ
::::2~
(Q
"0
C
Q)
OJ
<C
.......
U_~~
ti: 0)'" C\j .,
~ - Q) ?>
.q::'--'--
e:~~~
It) ~ C 0 "l(
1<: ::x: J: ~
~ E ~~:>..
;t~~~~
CS Vl Q.. Q.. ~
t;~~~
!.iJ~
6 ';::' ~~
Q::'
Q..
LtJ
,z*
.
:1-
'pA/8
~
as
"i
CiS
Cb
&
!
~
3N OlS 'Il91
....-
(,) (,)
.S!, ."
.Q e
~Q.:
:t
~
&
~
~
E
.s
-
fI) -
I
l
os
Cb
....
&
!
~
l ~
CiS Cb
'ti ....
i 0
Q:: ....
& ~ ~
.....
tE s
Cb
.c::
It
s
;e
..L"'"'
I:)~
I I
:4:-
,ti'l I:)
tE-
\f)cS
" II)
Cb ~
.... (,)
.2 u
fI) '"'
\;.
Cb I:)
:S~
(Ol.OCO
,....0,....
.-0_
,NO
o -C")
z~(,O
E >- 0,)
0,)~C'l
=::~8:
~
"0
c:
0,)
C'l
<{
.~s 1./191
":"'.
R'~
(.,) 0,)' " ~
c: ~C'=-
l.i:
~ Q:::Q:::>'-
:::s:::>~
(0 QC"C(
-J ::t::t:C) "t)
.... ~ ~
Q5 ~~:>.-
;t e ~i:5~ ~
GS ~ o.:l'l:~
~~~ 1;
.... ~
~ oq:l'l: E
C5 ;::-.~~ ~
2:
'"
Z*~
~
:Ii
~
co
Q)
-
~
c::
~
~
,,~
~lI)iO
-
i
~
is
Q)
~
~
"0
<.5
~
Q::
&
&:
Q)
oS
Q.:
.....-
u u
'I!..'~
.oe
~a:
~
!
oq:
~
~
-
s
~
I "
...
o
, "
-'
~-
.01 0
ci:-
It)~
...... Co)
q) :l
- u
o (J
-~
~ 0
~~
.~~~
a_
Na
"j "V
Z;::<o
E ;>. (I)
(l)roOJ
::::E&
ro
"0
c
(I)
OJ
<(
aalO>/oWW/
(/)
.9-
~
~
~
~
1_ ~ U
~ ~ ~
t :! --.l
<( (/)
~ ..(/) ..~
CS u ~
&: .~ '8
e 0
~ ~ Cl:. Cl::
l .. ~ 0..
..... - 0 ~
as ~ <:> .... Q:
5: J:: ~ t::
~ ~ .... ~ .S:
...... ~ 0 \.:. ~
- ~ Q) ~
~ ")..1 ("j Q..
~ ~~Nf;)'
~
w
z*~
:r:
:li
~~~
3N .~S ~9t
~
Cii
~
&
i
8
~
I
"'5
~
e
S
i
1)
:io
Cii
.!
&
j
8
'PIlIS J(lmo:;
1:)
Q::
&
Q::
Cb
oS
Q,.
il
.oe
~a.:
:.:
CI)
~
'II(
S
10
-
H;
'~'Q
~
:e
..t........
Q~
I I
:::-
.~ 0
ct:....
8
~
~
Cb ~
.... (,)
I:) (,)
....~
~
..... 0
.s~
~
.,
:2
t
....
..s
co L{HO
,,-0"-
.....0_
.N 0
o -L.r.l
Z;::<o
E ;>. (I)
(l)roOJ
==:E&
ro
"0
c
(I)
OJ
<(
0;
01
~
Q5
.,
&
i
~
~
..... ....
u u
oS!, .~
.oe
~a:
<::> ~
J:: &
~ ~ ....
: II)
CO e I- 0 i
I- Q ~
~ (.,) ~
~ <( E
s: ~ .s Q5
~ .... .,
-.J ~ ....
~ &
~IQ..
~ ~~ ~
W -
&
U)
'fJ/Il .J9!/fO:J tri6 '~rQ
~
~ II)
....
Q:: .s
w ~ ~
Z*~ ....
~ oS
.,
.5:
Q..
~
}
~
~
I .
....
O.
I .
.... r
.c,:-
.~ 0
Q:.....
!C)8
" II)
., II)
.... II)
o (,)
.... (,)
~ ~
Cb 0
~~
....co I.C"J co
.0 "-
a_
,NO
..J "<0
Z;::<o
E ;>. (I)
co mOl
::::E&
m
"0
c
(I)
Ol
<(
~
Q5
~
"
~
~
~
llQlZl ..t.......
Q:Q
~:s I I
~I :c-
.~ 0
ct:....
Ill"" !Od
K II)
., ~
.... (,)
Q)<<D .s (,)
III ~~ ~ ~
lS~ .... 0
~f s? Ii oS~
Q5
:!:! ~
....
~ <<Dill
3N 'IS 1./~9t ~ ~~
~ it
Iof-t
......
-1
.oe
~a:
lblZl
!! <<DQ)
!~ ~~
~~ :.:
i V)
..rtcl' ~
......
'II(
.... S
II) 10
i -
s?
Cii
.!
~
~
~
g ~
C\6 &
~ I
0') u ~~ l
....
CiS ~ ~~ E
s: ~ ........ .s
~ ~~
)..1<( Q..
~ ~-:>~
~
CI')
~
~
w
z*~
~
lQ
.!
o
~
..s
~
13
:s;;
'lJ
Q::
4)
0\
Ii:
II)
.5:
Q..
:11
COI.C"JCO
,,-0"-
.....0_
.N 0
o ""-
Z;::<o
E ;>. (I)
(I) mOl
::::E&
m
"0
c
(I)
Ol
<(
~
~ ~
~ ~
-...; ti-
~ .g f::
o I:)
C\I ..(/) I..> ~
..,.. U If:
o =::: <b.... .. (/)
.~ "!IJ.....
-.... <:>~o
~ ~ Q: .. (/) '~
~ Q.. !l'Od:
~ 8 <:> '~.c
....,,, :So.....
u ').. ~ d: ~
~ ~I~~f;)'
2:
UJ
z*~
~
:11
l
Q) llQ
IS lS
~~
~~~
....... ~
~
~
a
Q::
3N '1
CD
i~
1O~:d
'l;)
l:)
&
Cb
..!
~
E
.s
'pillS
1I0:J
u
lS IS
S $ ~
~l& ~ Cii
..~... Q)
....
~
~
~
1./19t
Q) Q)
~ :g
Si
R!Io"
...."" .....
II)
IS lS
~~
~ ~
~ol'
-16...
....
II)
f
1:i
:i:
i2i
.!
&
I
~
"7
"ti
Q::
II)
01
Q:
Cb
.S
Cl
u u
~ lS
~~
~j.t:e
lrfotcl'
....:..
.... .....
(,) (,)
.~.~
.QE
~a.:
:.:
V)
~
:S
10
-
~
Cb
....
I:)
-
~
-
oS
~
:f
..!.o;
o
, I
:c-
,01 0
Q:-
8
~
II)
Cb ~
:2 g
~ ~
'> 0
~~
Agenda Item No. 178
r -- --.-----.- May.j.o,..2DU5
4TH RE-SUBMITI AIPage 68 of 78' .
PUDZ-2003.AR-358S
PROJECT #%003010010
DA TE: 11/1 V04
MIKE DERUNTZ
WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
FOR
WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER
Prepared by:
Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOClATESt P.A.
CIVn. ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs, Florida 34134
(239) 947-1144
'November 2004
t,-"I'.
Mat1lew.f. . .....Ii.E.: .J.f
Flori~~on No.'s70Q8 ;7
'~-{~::(~~~<;:/
I' 'fT';' . ~
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 69 of 78
A. DRAINAGE INFORMATION
1. The basin consists of commercial buildings, parking, sidewalks, open space and a detention area
in the preserve.
2. The control elevation is 12,00 NOVD.
3, The following design storms were used for this basin:
· 25 Year, 3 day rainfall = 8.50 inches · 1.359 == ] 1.55 inches
· 100 Year, 3 day rainfall == 10.5 inches. 1,359 = 14.27 inches
4, The runoffhydrographs were created using the SFWMD Routing Model Cascade 2001 (Version
1.0) program.
5, Time of concentration (tc)
= 2(Total site area/640)o.s
== 2(6.46/640)0.5
= 0.20 hours
Use tc == 0.50 hours
6, Stage/storage calculations:
STAGE PA VEMENTJSIDEWALK DRY DETENTION SITE (OPEN SPACE) TOTAL
12.0 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
13.0 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
14.0 0.00 (0,62 acXl.O ft) = 0.62 0,00 0.62
15.0 0.00 (0.62 acX2.0 ft) = 1.24 0,00 1.24
16.0 0,00 (O.62acX3.0 ft).. 1.86 0.00 1.86
17.0 (1/1.S)(2.29aeXl ftI2)= 0,76 (0.62 aeX4,O ft) = 2.48 (1/1.5)(2.63 acXl ft/2)" 0.88 4.12
17.5 (I.S/l.SX2.29acX1.5 ftI2) = 1.72 (O.62acX4.S ft) - 2.79 (I.S/I.5)(2.63acXI.S ft/2).. 1.97 6.48
Nute: All stoNge WIIUD art! In tlCrt!-f"'- Opm lIpfIct! tlIWIS ,,,ul tJu pllHllfentlsillewalh IlH IU6l111fetl to be IiIIar betHw1I ekwIIWn 16.0 IUfIl
17.5 at ,.",ich point both IUWlS wUI be flooded.
7, Soil Storage
The average depth to the water table will be
= average site grade elevation - average site water table elevation
== 16.5 -12,0
== 4,5 feet
From the soil storage table, asswning the 25% compaction and 4.5 feet to the water table, up
to 8.18 inches of moisture can be stored in the soil \Ulder pervious areas.
F:IJOB\WILSON-BLVD'IPUD SWM Report.doc
Page 1 of4
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 70 of 78
Compute available site wide soil storage, S
= soil storage available * pervious areas / total site area
= (8.18'') * (2,63 ac) / (6.46 ac)
= 3.33" of soil storage
Compute SCS Curve Number, CN
= 1 OOO/(S+ 1 0)
= 1000/(13.33)
=75
8, Stage/discharge calculations.
The discharge calculations were performed by Cascade and are included at the end of this report.
9. Surface Water Profiles and Runoff Peak Rates
25- YEAR STORM 1<>0- YEAR STORM
STAGE (NGVO) 16.02 16.99
DISCHARGE (CFS) 0,97 0,00
The minimwn perimeter berm will be 16.10. The minimmn finish floor elevation will be 17.50,
10. The receiving body is assumed to rise from elevation 12.0 at hour zero to elevation 14.0 at hour
72 for the 25-year and l00-year storms.
B.
SITE DATA
Total Site/Drainage Basin = 6.46 ac 100. ()()OlD
Impervious =
Buildings = 0,92 Be 14.2%
pavement/Curb/Sidewalk = 2.29 ac 35.4%
Water Management = 0.62 ac 9.6%
Pervious
Open space = 2.63 ac 40.7%
WATEROUALITYANALYSffi
c.
Compute the greater of the first inch ofnmoffversus 2.5 times the percentage of imperviousness.
1. Compute the first inch of runoff from the developed project:
= (1 '')(6.46 8e)(I'/12'')
= 0.54 ac-ft
F:OOB\WILSON.BLVD\PUD SWM Report.doc
Pqe2of4
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 71 of 78
2. Compute 2,5 inches times the percentage of impenriousness:
Site area for water quality pervious/impervious calculations only:
= Total project - (water management + buildings)
= 6.46 ac - (0.62 ac + 0.92 ac)
= 4,92 ac of site area for water quality pervious/impervious
hnpervious area for water quality pervious/impervious calculations only:
= (Site area for water quality pervious/impervious) - pervious
= 4.92 ac - 2,63 ac
= 2.29 ac
Percentage of imperviousness for water quality:
= (Impervious area for water quality/Site area for water quality) ... 100
= (2.29 ad 4.92 ac) ... 100
= 46,5% impervious
Calculate 2.5 inches times the percentage impervious:
= 2.5" ... 0.465
= 1.16" to be treated
Compute the volume required for water quality detention:
= inches to be treated ... (total site - water management)
= 1.16"'" (6.46 ac - 0.62 ac) ... (1 '/12'')
= 0.56 ac-ft
0,56 > 0.54 so 2.5" times the percentage of imperviousness controls water quality requirements,
Since the site utilizes dry detention for water management, water quality requirements can be reduced
by 25%. Therefore,
0.56 ac-ft. 0,75 = 0.42 ac-ft
Setting the main weir at elevation 13.68 by interpolating from the stage-storage table can contain this
quantity. Below, the elevation is calculated.,.
(14,0 -13.0)/(0.62 - 0,00)
1,613
0.68
13.68
= (X - 13,0)/(0.42 - 0.00)
(X - 13.0)/(0.42)
= (X - 13.0)
= X
F:\JOB\WnroN.BLVDIPUD SWM Report.doc
Pap3of4
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 72 of 78
D. BLEEDER DESIGN
The bleeder is designed to allow OS' of nmoff from the entire drainage basin to discharge in a period
of 24 hours. The flow rate is calculated as follows:
Qbl~= (OS' /24 hours)(6.46 acres)(1' /12")(43,560 if/ acre)(l hour /3600 see) = 0.14 cfs
A circular orifice is used in this model. The equation for the flow rate is as follows:
Qo = (4.8)(Area)(Head)o,s = (4,8)(pi){D2/4)(Ho.s)
The bead is the height from the centroid of the bleeder to the invert of the main weir. It was
determined that the main weir would be at elevation 13.68 to meet water quality requirements.
Therefore, iterating and solving for the diameter of the bleeder yields this equation:
D = {[4. 0.14] / [4.8. pi. (13.68 _12.09)o.s]}o.s = 0.17'
This shows that a O.l7'-diameter bleeder is allowed in the water control structure for this basin.
However, this small diameter bleeder is not practical. A 3" (0,25') bleeder will be used.
E. AI ,LOW ABLE DISCHARGE
Allowable discharge is based on 0,15 cfs per acre to be discharged through the water control structure
dming the 25-year design storm,
(6.46 acres)(0.15 cfSIacre) = 0.97 cis
Using a 3"--diameter bleeder orifice with an invert elevation of 12.00 and a 4"-diameter main orifice
with an invert of 13 ,68, the discharge during the 3-day 25-year stonn is 0,97 cfs,
F:IJ08\WILSON-BLVD'IPUD SWM Report.doc
....4of4
Agenda Item No, 178
May 10, 2005
Page 73 of 78
Rezone Findings
PETmON PUDZ-2003-AR-358S
Section 10,03.05 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report
and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County
Commissioners shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the
proposed change in relation to the following, where applicable.
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals,
objectives, policies, Future Land Use Map and the elements of the
Growth Management Plan (GMP);
The property is located within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict as
identified in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Specific development
requirements are established in the GMP, and the PUD document contains
appropriate references assuring compliance with the provisions of the
Neighborhood Center Subdistrict.
2. The existing land use pattern;
The subject property is located at the intersection of Golden Gate
Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. Properties across Golden Gate
Boulevard are zoned and developed with Commercial Convenience (C-2)
land uses, Property south is zoned Estates and developed with a single-
family home. Properties to the east and west are zoned Estates and are
undeveloped Estates lots. All of the lots at the comers of Golden Gate
Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard are classified as being in the
''Neighborhood Center Subdistricf' within the Golden Gate Area Master
Plan of the GMP. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Future
Land Use designation for this area.
3, The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and
nearby districts;
The proposed PUD to PUD rezone was the subject of a GMP amendment
to specifically allow storm water management within the 75-foot buffer
areas for ''Neighborhood Center Subdistrict." The services that will be
provided by this PUD can serve the nearby residents. This PUD is located
within a Neighborhood Center Subdistrict and opposite an existing
commercial zoned site, Therefore, the subject site will not create an
isolated district.
EXHIBIT A
PUDZ-2003-AR-3585
lof4
CCPC 417/05
Agenda Item No, 178
May 10, 2005
Page 74 of 78
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation
to existing conditions on the property proposed for change;
The proposed district boundaries are logically drawn and they are
consistent with the GMP.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the
proposed amendment necessary;
The site is currently approved for a mix of commercial and retail uses that
are specified within the parameters of the ''Neighborhood Center
Subdistrict" and the applicant intend to develop the property within the
parameters of the ''Neighborhood Center Subdistricf', The proposed
amendment is primarily intended to allow the water management area to
be located within the 75-foot-wide buffer,
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence Dving
conditions in the neighborhood;
No adverse impacts to nearby residential uses will result from the
proposed PUD amendment. The GMP amendments pertaining to this
property were adopted on May 14, 2002, September 10, 2003, and
October 26, 2004, This amendment restricted use of the property to a mix
of intermediate commercial uses and included provisions for allowable
buildable area, shared parking requirements, limited access to the major
intersecting streets, buffering, architectural style, building height, exterior
lighting restrictions, preservation guidelines, water management
guidelines and permitted and prohibited land uses, The Wilson Boulevard
Center PUD is consistent with these approved development standards,
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase
traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with
surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of
vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development or otherwise atTect public safety.
The Transportation Services Division has reviewed the proposed PUD and
has incorporated appropriate language into the PUD document, which
renders the PUD compatible with surrounding uses and the Transportation
Element. No level of service impacts result from this project. Therefore,
the proposed PUD will not excessively increase traffic congestion and is
consistency with Policy 5,1 of the Transportation Element.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem;
PUD~2003-~-3585
2of4
CCPC 4/7/05
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 75 of 78
The project will be reviewed and approved subject to requirements of
Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. The
PUD document incorporates appropriate references to insure that no
adverse drainage conditions will result from the proposed development
and incOlporates the criteria for utilizing the 75-foot-wide buffer area for
stormwater management.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to
adjacent areas;
The proposed commercial intermediate uses, as specified in the
''Neighborhood Center Subdistrict" of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan,
will be required to meet building setbacks and single-story height
restrictions, When meeting these requirements, light and air will not be
reduced to adjacent properties,
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in
the adjacent area;
This site is adjacent to other residential and potential residential uses. An
appraisal of estimated future property values resulting from a rezone is not
an issue addressed at the rezoning stage, Given the required building and
development standards, no diminution of property values is anticipated
11 Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement
or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing
regulations;
The development of adjacent properties, in accordance with existing
regulations, will not be affected,
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special
privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public
welfare;
If the proposed rezone is determined by the Board of County
Commissioners to be consistent with the GMP, the proposed change will
not constitute a grant of special privilege.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be
used in accordance with existing zoning;
Under the approved Neighborhood Center Subdistrict, only the specified
intermediate commercial uses can be developed on this site. The proposed
PUD document is designed to meet the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict
regulations.
PUDZ-2003-AR-3585
30f4
CCPC 4/7/05
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 76 of 78
14. Whether the change suggested. is out of scale with the needs of the
neighborhood or the County;
The request is consistent with the GMP, and is therefore, within the needs
of the community. The GMP limits the site to a maximum of 5.00 acres of
commercial development and 2.15 acres of project buffering and right-of-
way, An "Old Florida" architectural style is required for the commercial
buildings, and the building height is limited to one (1) story, with a
maximum height of35 feet.
15. Whether is it impossible to Ond other adequate sites in the County for
the proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
The GMP permits the uses identified within the proposed PUD document
at the location of the subject property.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site
alteration which would be required to make the property usable for
any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning
classification.
The subject property fronts on Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson
Boulevard. A 25-foot-wide landscaping buffer is required along the two
external rights-of-way. A 75-foot-wide buffer is required along the
abutting residential property. Open space is required within a pedestrian-
accessible courtyard,
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public
facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in
the Collier County GMP and as defmed and implemented through
the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as
amended.
A multi-disciplined team responsible for jurisdictional elements of the
GMP has reviewed this petition and they have found it consistent with the
GMP, The conditions of approval have been incorporated into the PUD
document. Staff reviews for adequacy of public services and levels of
service determined that required infrastructure meets with GMP
established relationships.
PUDZ-2003-AR-3585
4of4
CCPC 4/7/05
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10,2005
Page 77 of 78
POO FINDINGS
PETmON POOZ-2003-AR-3S8S
Section 10.03,05 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report and
recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners be
supported by the following findings, where applicable:
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed
in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding area, traffic
and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
The property is designated for commercial intermediate uses as identified by the
Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan
(GGAMP). The site is located at the intersection of Golden Gate Boulevard and
Wilson Boulevard, and is located in the ''Neighborhood Center Subdistrict" of the
GGAMP,
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed
agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those
proposed, particularly as they may related to arrangements or provisions to
be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and
facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
The petitioner has provided evidence that the PUD is under unified control.
3. Conformity of the proposed POO with the goals, objectives and policies of the
GMP.
Staff analysis indicates that the Wilson Boulevard Center PUD is consistent with
the goals, objectives and policies of the GMP.
4. The internal and external compatibility of the proposed uses, which
conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions
on design, and buffering and screening requirements.
Staff analysis indicates that the PUD is compatible, both internally and externally,
with the proposed uses and with the existing swrounding uses,
S. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to
serve the development.
The PUD document and conceptual master plan make specific provisions for open
space and preservation areas consistent with the GMP and Land Development
Code.
EXHIBIT B
PlIT)~2003-AJt-3585
lof2
CCPC MEETING 4/7/05
Agenda Item No. 178
May 10, 2005
Page 78 of 78
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the
adequacy of avaHable improvements and facUities, both public and private.
The PUD is required to meet concurrency requirements at the time of Site
Development Plan approval,
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
The site is not designed, nor intended to provide for expansion, which is
consistent with the intent of the specific provisions of the Neighborhood Center
Subdistrict
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such
modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least
equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
Staff analysis indicates that the Wilson Boulevard Center PUD conforms to the
PUD regulations.
PlIT)~2003-AJt-3585
2of2
CCPC MEETING 417/05
Agenda Item No. 17C
May 10, 2005
Page 1 of 7
,..-~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to adopt a Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida applying the Annual Mid-Cycle Indexing adjustments to
amend the Water and Sewer Impact Fee rate schedule, which is Schedule Two of
Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances
(The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance No. 2001-13, as
amended) and providing for an effective date of June 1, 2005
OBJECTIVE: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopt the
attached Resolution to amend Schedule Two of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County
Code of Laws and Ordinances, thereby increasing the Water and Sewer Impact Fee rates by 3.8
percent (3.8%), which is consistent with the Board's direction for mid-cycle adjustments as set
forth by Code of Laws Section 74-303(g),
-.
CONSIDERATIONS: On December 14,2004, the Board of County Commissioners adopted
Ordinance No. 2004-79, which amended Ordinance 2001-13, the Collier County Consolidated
Impact Fee Ordinance, which is Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances,
to require annual mid-cycle water and sewer impact fee rate adjustments based on the percentage
change in the most recently available Consumer Price Index for the Miami-Ft. Lauderdale MSA
as reported by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. The index reported for February
2005 is 190.6 and for February 2004 is 183.6. This represents a 3.8% increase in the index
utilized for the water and sewer impact fee rate adjustments.
The attached Resolution provides for an effective date of June 1, 2005, which is exactly one year
after the water and sewer impact fees were last adjusted.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: The application of this rate indexing ensures that
Water and Sewer Impact Fee assessments consistently reflect a pro rata share of the costs of
growth-necessitated capital improvements, promote predictability ofthe annual revenues, reduce
costs for services of rate consultants, and is intended to avoid larger rate increases every three
years.
FISCAL IMPACT: The current Water Impact Fee per Schedule Two of Appendix A is $2,660
per ERC. Applying a 3.8% increase to the current rate would raise the Water Impact Fee to
$2,760 per ERC, an increase of $100. The current Sewer Impact Fee per Schedule Two of
Appendix A is $3,010 per ERe. Applying a 3.8% increase to the current rate would raise the
Sewer Impact Fee to $3,125 per ERC, an increase of $115. In accord with Paragraph (1) of
Section 18 in Chapter 2003-353, Laws of Florida (the Collier County Water-Sewer District's
Special Act), Water and Sewer Impact Fees are collectable only within the geographic
boundaries of that District.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The proposed changes to Schedule Two of Appendix A of Chapter
74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances are internally consistent, comply with all
,-.
Resolution -
Water and Sewer IF Indexing
Page 2
Agenda Item No, 17C
May 10, 2005
Page 2 of 7
applicable constitutional and general law, and are legally sufficient for Board consideration and
approval.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached Resolution
to amend Schedule Two of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and
Ordinances, (The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, No, 2001-13, as amended) to
increase the Water and Sewer Impact Fee rates by 3.8 percent (3.8%), effective June 1,2005,
PREPARED BY: Joe Bellone, Operations Supervisor, Public Utilities Operations
--
.-
Agenda Item No, 17C
May 10, 2005
Page 3 of 7
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Meeting Date
HC
Recommendation to adopt a Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida applying the Annual Mid-Cycle Indexing adjustments to amend the Water
and Sewer Impact Fee rate schedule, which is Schedule Two of Appendix A of Chapter 74
of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated
Impact Fee Ordinance No, 2001-13, as amended) and providing for an effective date of
June 1. 2005
5/10/20059:00:00 AM
Item Number
Item Summary
Approved By
Thomas Wides
Operations Director
Date
Public Utilities
Public Utilities Operations
4/18/200512:47 PM
Approved By
John A, Yonkosky
Utility Billing Director
Date
Public Utilities
USCS
4/19/20055:22 PM
Approved By
Amy Patterson
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Impact Fee Manager
Date
Financial Admin, & Housing
4/26/2005 8:42 AM
Approved By
James W. DeLony
Public Utilities Administrator
Date
Public Utilities
Public Utilities Administration
4/27/20059:05 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/28/20054:18 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/2/20056:14 PM
Approved By
Michael Smykowski
Management & Budget Director
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
5/3/2005 4:57 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
5/3/2005 7:41 PM
Agenda Item No. 17C
May 10, 2005
Page 4 of 7
RESOLUTION NO, 2005-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SCHEDULE TWO OF
APPENDIX A TO THE COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED IMPACT
FEE ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED, TO INCREASE THE CURRENT
WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES BY 3.8 PERCENT; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 1,2005.
WHEREAS, on Mardi 13, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners
("Board") adopted Ordinance No. 2001-13, the Collier County Consolidated
Impact Fee Ordinance (CIFO), repealing and superceding all of the County's
then existing impact fee regulations, and consolidating all of the County's impact
fee regulations into that Ordinance, codified in Chapter 74 of the Collier County
Code of Laws and Ordinances (Code of Laws); and
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2004. the Board adopted Ordinance No.
2004-79 to amend the CIFO and Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws by adding a
new Subsection "(g)" to Section 74-303 (in Article III) of Ordinance No. 2001-13
(The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) to require annual mid-
cycle indexing adjustments to the water and sewer impact fees; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2004-79 sets forth indexing methodologies
in Code of Laws Section 74-303(g) to make lIIIIlual indexing adjustments to the
Water and Sewer Impact Fees controlled by the p~ge changes in the then
most recent "Consumer Price Index - Miami-Ft. Lauderdale MSA, FL, All
Items" as reponed by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, compared to
the index in the prior year for the same time period; and
WHEREAS, Collier County uses Water and Sewer Impact Fees to
fund, or partially fund, the CoUier County Water-Sewer District's necessary
water and sewer system capital improvements necessitated by growth in Collier
County; and
WHEREAS, application of the indexing acljustments in this instance
results in a 3.8 percent increase in the Water and Sewer Impact Fees; and
WHEREAS, these recommended rate increase increases these Impact
Fees at the maximum level allowed in accordance with equity tests established
pursuant to Florida law; and
WHEREAS, staff has thoroughly reviewed the calculations and
findings. and staff concurs with the recommended 3,8% increase to the Water
and Sewer Impact Fcc rate schedule, and stafIrecommends that the Board adopt
this Resolution to implement these re<:ommended impact fee incn:asesj and
WHEREAS, the Board accepts staff's recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
Pace I of2
Agenda Item No, 17C
May 10, 2005
Page 5 of 7
The Board of County Commissioners hereby declares,.fter advertiJed
public hearing, that the Water and Sewer Impact Fee rates set forth in the revised
Schedule Two of Appendix A (attached hereto as Exhibit" A") of Ordinllllc:e No.
2001.13, as amended, the County's Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, as
increased by 3.8%, are fair and reasonable and effective on June 1,2005, lire to
be usessed within the geographic boundaries of the Collier County Water-Sewer
District to individual who, or entitles that, receive or will receive benefits from
Water and/or Sewer capital improvements necessitated by inl:reued population
and related growth driven development within those geographic areas,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these revised Water and Sewer
Impact Fees wiD take effect as of8:00 A.M. on Wednesday, June 1,2005,
This Resolution is adopted after motion; second and majority vote
favoring adoption this_day
,2005,
A TIBST
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Deputy Cter1c
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
1OW\~
Thomas C. a1mer
Assistant County Attorney
Paae 2 oU
Agenda Item No. He
May 10,2005
Page 6 of 7
APPENDIX A
SCHEDULE TWO - EFFECTIVE June 1, 2004
WATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMP ACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
RESIDENTIAL
INDIVIDUALLY METERED
LIVING SPACE (SQ,FT.) BASIS OF FEE ALLOC4 TION METER SIZE ERC WATER IMPACT WEWER IMPACT
(EfltiJlfllmllUddmtl., C"nMCtioIl) FEE FEE
o TO 4.999
1--!..~!!!:!!...'!.~Rf..!.s.;;:.~r:!..~!!!!!2.____ -------_!~~!!..._--,----- 3/4" I ~ ~
-.-.---.--,--
5,000 OR MORE (GPM-24)/20)+1 BASED ON ERC
(OR MORE THAN' IiA THROOMS) PER ERC PER ERC (GPM FROM AWWA M21) MllliwM",J1S70 ~
RESIDENTIAL
MASTER METERED
LIVING SPACE (SQ,FT.) BASIS OF FEE ALLOC4TION METER SIZE ERC WATER IMPACT IsEWERIMPACT
(Ef"w.J.d RuWmd.l CfHUf<<lUnt) FEE FEE
___ 0 TO 75~_____ PER UNIT PER ERC 0.33 ~ ~
.-------.-----------.- ------ ------- - --
i--__~I2_1,5~~____ PER UNIT PER ERC 0.67 ~-- >--. S2,919 __
,----.--.------------- ------- ------
1,501 TO 4,999 (AND NO
MORE THAN.t BATHROOMS) PER UNIT PER ERC I ~ ~
-------,---- .--------------.-.---- ------,- ---
5,000 OR MORE (GPM-24)/20)+1 BASED ON ERC
(OR MORE THAN' IiA THROOMS) PER ERC PER ERC (GPM FROM A WWA MZ'J MI"IIffIl",US70 ~
NON-RESIDENTIAL
WATER METER SIZE ERC RANGE WATER IMPACT FEE SEWER IMPACT FEE
OR CCWSDEClllTVALENT (ROfj"ti ERCs ID Ihe ,,~., (mlh) MIN M4X MIN M4X
~_____....2.1.?___._______ --..--~-_._.___._,_._1......_.____ ___.__,_.____ $~!eQ ____.__.__, -_._-_.__._.~,~.Q --.----
-----,-.---.._!.._..--.------ ---_.!:!_._--,------~!.._...._- -_._~-- ---~---- Ur6+I- ~
-----.---- .-------.-
-------2.:.~-.---___.L_,___~~__._._..______2._.___ __.....!!!_le ,__ ____,_~___ ~ ~
--------- .--.-----
2 5.1 7.9 ~ ~ ~ w,.m...
1-____________ ___________________ ------ -------- ------- -
3 --__~______,____.l!:?___._ _,,__ U I :~!.r:___ $11e,9.:l1 ~ __ S~__
----------...------- '---------- ---------
<I 55 128.9 Sl1~J(J(J SUJ,67t nU-,u(J $117,919
---------------.- ------,---.--.---.-----.--,- ------..-.--- '--------- ------ -------
____2...______ 129 357.9 SJ1.:l,14Q S93:1,914 $ng,290 $1,077,279
--.-358-.-.------.-6'o7r-- -- S9ii,lS(J--- --"i',59~7J(}() - 1---------- - SJ,6g~iiii'i/-
8 SJ,U7?,iI(J
Agenda Item No. 17C
May 10,2005
Page 7 of7
PROPOSED
APPENDIX A
SCHEDULE TWO - EFFECTIVE June 1, 2005
WATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
RESIDENTIAL
INDIVIDUALLY METERED
LIVING SPACE (SQ.FT.) BASIS OF FEE ALLOCA TlON METER SIZE ERC WATER IMPACT SEWER IMPACT
(Sf"i..."", RnUlMliIll CmMfcrIoN) FEE FEE
1,501 TO 4,999 (ANDNO
',-~~..!.!!!!!!.I!!!!!!:!..~-- PER UNIT PER ERC I $2,760 __$3~___
-------- ---- --------
5,000 OR MORE (GPM-24)/20)+ I BASED ON ERC
[OR MORE THAN' BATHROOMS) PER ERC PER ERC [GPMFRoMAWWAmZ) MlItilfflf'" n'6D $3,125
RESIDENTIAL
\ MASTER METERED
LIVING SPACE (SQ.FT.) I BASIS OF FEE ALLOCATION r METER SIZE ERC WATER IMPACT IsEWER IMPACT
(E,.m.1#toJ Rui","",C_I<I/<Hf) FEE FEE
o TO 750 PER UNIT PER ERC 0.33 $920 $1,040
-.----.-------,----- ----..-...---...--.----.--.... ~_.._--_._--_.- ...----.-------. fo..---,---.--- ---,-
751 TO 1,500 ______~~~.E___ PER ERC 0.67 $1,840 $2,080
--- __H' - ------ ----.-
1,501 TO 4,999 (AND NO
__.____M.!!!!..!...~..!...~:..1f!!;!!J.!'!!....,_____ ------_._._.!:~~~!:!"_...,----,_._, PER ERC I $2,760 $3,125
------,----..-.-...-, --.-.-----
5,000 OR MORE (GPM-24)120)+1 BASED ON ERC
(OR MORE THAN' BATHROOMS) PER ERC PER ERC (GPM FROM AWWA MZZ) MilUmwn SZ660 $3,125
NON-RESIDENTIAL
WATER METER SIZE ERC RANGE WATER IMPACT FEE SEWER IMPACT FEE
OR CCW,YD E(JUlVALENT (RDUn" ERe.,,, ,Ir_ """rut 11ItUh) MIN MAX MIN MAX
0.75 0.0 1.0 $2,760 $3.125
--.--------.-.------ -.----------------.-- -------..--- --------.-- ------.---.F------
1 1.1 2.5 $3,036 $6,900 $3,438 $7,813
--..--.----------.---.-.....- .--.-.............-....-.......-.......-.-............--. .-......-..-................-.-.. ........-.-.-...---............- --..----,---.-.--. .------,--.-...
1.5 2.6 5.0 $7,176 ...___,_,_~13,80g__......._.. -_._,._-~!:,~~~,-_...- $15.625
------..---.----.----.... ........----.-.......-..-----.---........... ..--....--...--.-.--..,. -..-.-........-..---...
2 5.1 7,9 $14,076 $21,804 $15,938 $24,688
-------.......----.-------- .-...--.....-...-......-..--.......--..-.......- ..-..--......____00 ..-----.-.-.--...--- -.------.-.---- .---..--.--...
3 8.0 54.9 $22,080 $151,524 $25,000 $171,563
--------------- ----.---------------- -----.--- ---______00 --,----- ------
1/ 55.0 128.9 $151,800 $355,764 $171,875 $402,813
----.-..--.------ -----.--....----....-......--- -...--.-.-------- ...---------....- -.---.--....---- -.-------..-
6 129.0 357.9 $356,040 $987,804 $403,125 $1,118,438
-----.-...........--...-......-...-...- .-.--.-358."O"-....-----.--'7;"1jo.o-----
8 ---"T988,-;Tso'--'- -'-'-jj',656,007r-.-m --"si718, "fs7j'-- '-'$T,875~01j;r-.m