Commissioner McDaniel Ex-parte Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr.
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
September 11, 2018
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.A. ***This item ha been continued from the July 10, 2018 BCC meeting.* This item requires
narte disclos4= be provided by the Commission members.Should a hearing be held on this item,
all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to adopt a Resolution of the Board
of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida,granting a parking exemption,to allow off-site
parking on a contiguous lot zoned Residential Single Family(RSF-4)and repeal Resolution No.09-
152, relating to a prior parking exemption.The subject property is located between Rosemary
Lane and Ridge Street, in Section 22,Township 49 South,Range 25 East in Collier County, Florida.
(P120170002684)
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
X SEE FILE E<Meetings Correspondence Fe-mails Calls
Met with Anna Weaver, Josh Fruth, Jessica Harrelson and Jenna Woodward
9.B. This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an
Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 99-94,the Pine Ridge Commons Planned Unit
Development(PUD),to add 325 multi-family dwelling units as permitted uses in the commercial
district in the areas designated on the master plan; by adding development standards for
residential structures; by revising Exhibit A,the PUD master plan and providing for an effective
date. The subject property is located on the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Pine Ridge
Road and Goodlette-Frank Road in Section 10,Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,
Florida. [PL20160002306] (This is a companion to Agenda Item 9.A)
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
[1 SEE FILE MMeetings Correspondence Fe-mails Calls
Met with Rich Yovanovich, Wayne Arnold and David Genson
FilsonSue
From: Muffy Clark Gill <muffyclarkgill@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 10:17 PM
To: McDanielBill
Subject: Sandbanks LLC
Please see the following comments from my neighbor, Dawn Litchfield Brown regarding the rezoning Petition
Muffy Clark Gill
1006 Ridge Street
(239)253-8827
From: Dawn Litchfield Brown<dawn@naplesmoneymanagers.com>
Date:September 10,2018 at 8:38:44 PM CDT
To: 'GrecoSherry'<Sherry.Greco@coffiercountyfl.gov>, 'Muffy Clark Gill'<muffyclarkgiflc gmail.com>,
Muffy Clark Gill<muffyclarkgill@mac.com>,"'coachd45@aol.com"'<coachd45@aol.com>
Cc:TaylorPenny<renny.T ayior@coiiiercountyfi.gov>, 'Donna Fiala'<cionnafiaia@gmaii.com>
Subject:Sandbanks PE
I 100%support Muffy's request. Unfortunately I am unable to attend this meeting as we did the
previous meetings in front of the Development Council. Many of us attended several of those meetings
along with independent meetings with both Sandbanks and the Council. Apparently they don't or
haven't given much consideration to the traffic as the study they have is old and only for the office
center.
if they want this to go through they need to set aside enough money to cover 4 of those Solar Speed
Signs. Like the ones there are on the Naples High School Street. I think that is 22"d
That street has:
• 20 rniles per hour because of the schoof .
o Ours is 30 and no one goes that slow. We have about 20 kids at the bus stop and living
on the street.
• NON passing double lines
o Ours has passing lines(I got passed going through the deep water last week)
• They also have the speeding monitor signs
o We don't even have a stop sign
• And excellent police monitoring of speeders. I know because I use that street all the time to go
from Goodlette to Walgreens.
o We call on the speeders all the time and it is getting violent
• I am not 100%sure on this one but I think they don't allow trailer truck traffic
o Our of course allows everything
i have ail the information on the solar signs and am trying to get the pricing. I have been on the waiting
list for a quote. I will scan them to you tomorrow so you will know which ones we are talking about
1
FilsonSue
From: Anna Weaver <Anna@davidsonengineering.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 3:14 PM
To: FilsonSue
Subject: Meeting request
Good afternoon Sue,
The planning team at Davidson Engineering would like to request a meeting with Commissioner McDaniel regarding the
Sandbanks Parking Exemption for the proposed commercial site redevelopment.This request was originally scheduled
to be heard by the BCC on July 10 but was continued to September 11.We are available to meet at the following times:
8/30 after 12pm
8/31 before 2pm
9/4 after 11am
9/5 after 12pm
9/6 after 11am
Please let me know if there is any additional info needed and if these dates work for his schedule.
Thank you,
Anna Weaver
Senior Planner
DE
DAVIDSON
CELEBRATING YEARS
Main: 239.434.6060
Anna(a7davidsonengineering.com
www.davidsonenginerinq.com
Naples, FL Sarasota, FL
1
FilsonSue
From: FilsonSue
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 1:40 PM
To: 'Anna Weaver'
Subject: RE: Meeting request
Hi Anna,you are confirmed for the 315`at 1:00 pm at the BCC Office.
The Board of County Commissioners offices are located in the Government Complex at 3299 Tamiami Trail East, at the
corner of Airport and Tamiami Trail East.
HERE is a link to a map of the complex. If you're coming from the North or West, use the entrance off Airport(where the
ROAD to Airport Road is on the map)and drive through the complex; if you're coming from the South/East,the entrance
from the East Trail is the easiest(near U.S.41 on the map). For most, it's best to use Parking Garage#2;there are
handicapped spaces near Human Resources, Building B.
Our offices are in Building F—County Admin on the map. You'll pass through a metal detector at the entrance to the
building,and they'll direct you from there.
Sue
From:Anna Weaver [mailto:Anna@davidsonengineering.com]
Sent:Thursday,August 16, 2018 1:29 PM
To: FilsonSue<Sue.Filson@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: RE: Meeting request
Sue,
Thanks for getting back to me. We would like to confirm 1:00 on August 31St. In attendance will be myself,Josh Fruth,
Jessica Harrelson and Jenna Woodward all from Davidson Engineering.Jessica would be the easiest to reach at her cell
phone number 239-821-4738.
Anna Weaver
` fior Planner
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
Main: 239.434.6060
AnnaCcz�dav;dsonenq neering.com
www.DavidsonEngineering.com
Naples, FL Sarasota,FL
From: FilsonSue<Sue.Filson@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent:Thursday,August 16,2018 7:45 AM
To:Anna Weaver<Anna@davidsonengineering.com>
Subject: RE: Meeting request
1
Hi Anna, I can schedule you for 1:00 pm on Friday,August 31St. I will need the names of everyone who will be present at
this meeting and a cell number where I can reach someone if needed. Let me know if this works for you. I will add this
to the Commissioner's calendar once I receive the names.
Thank you.
Sue Filson, Aide to
William L. McDaniel,Jr.
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-8605
Sue.filson@colliercountyfl.gov
- Web Page
WEB PAGE: —
From:Anna Weaver[mailto:Anna@davidsonengineering.com]
Sent:Wednesday,August 15, 2018 3:14 PM
To: FilsonSue<Sue.Filson@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: Meeting request
Good afternoon Sue,
The planning team at Davidson Engineering would like to request a meeting with Commissioner McDaniel regarding the
Sandbanks Parking Exemption for the proposed commercial site redevelopment.This request was originally scheduled
to be heard by the BCC on July 10 but was continued to September 11. We are available to meet at the following times:
8/30 after 12pm
8/31 before 2pm
9/4 after 11am
9/5 after 12pm
9/6 after 11am
Please let me know if there is any additional info needed and if these dates work for his schedule.
Thank you,
Anna Weaver
4
DAVIDSON
CELEBRATING YEARS
Main: 239.434.6060
2
Annadavidsonenqineering.com
xm^mx.davidsonmngioemhng.morn
Naples, FL Sarasota, FL
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records, If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records nequest, do not send electronic mail to this entity. |nstead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
FilsonSue
From: FilsonSue on behalf of McDanielBill
Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 9:27 AM
To: 'Muffy Clark Gill'
Subject: RE: Sandbanks LLC Rezoning Petition
Ms. Gill,
Thank you for contacting me expressing your opposition to the proposed Sandbanks LLC Rezoning Petition. It is very
helpful to receive your input on the issues that concern you. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully
consider all comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioners.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Bill
William L. McDaniel,Jr.,Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-8605
Original Message
From: Muffy Clark Gill [mailto:muffyclarkgill@mac.com]
Sent:Tuesday,September 4, 2018 11:46 PM
To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: Sandbanks LLC Rezoning Petition
Dear Commissioner McDaniel,
I am writing you tonight as I am in transit to ask for your support in requiring Sandbanks, LLC .to have their residential
non-conforming use parking lot not allow entrance snd exit onto Ridge Street. This non-conforming lot is right next to
my home and studio and I have been fighting along with my neighbors since March against their rezoning petition.They
have not been good neighbors in so far as negotiating traffic flow entrance and exit restrictions as well as the height of
the wall separating their property from mine. I asked for an eight foot wall and they refused saying it was too expensive.
At the Planning Board Meetings they were told to make the walls 8 feet tall. We also asked for an escrow account be
created by them to help with paying for future traffic calming. They refused that as well.
In the last few years Ridge Street has gone from being a dead end residential street to a traffic throughway.There are
over 22 children who live on this street and are in danger boarding their school buses due to the tremendous amount of
traffic using Ridge as a shortcut between US 41 and Goodlette Road. Couple that with the recent flooding on Ridge and
we can't handle additional traffic that would be generated by a new larger shopping center.
Please read the proposal over and talk to staff about this zoning petition change.The 75 foot tall office building will
create less traffic snd noise than a new 17,000 sq ft shopping center.Thank-you.
Sincerely,
Muffy Clark Gill
1006 Ridge Street
Naples
239-253-8827
1
GrecoSherry
From: Anna Weaver <Anna@davidsonengineering.com>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 9:17 AM
To: GrecoSherry
Cc: Jessica Harrelson; Josh Fruth
Subject: Sandbanks PE
Attachments: 2018-08-28-SANDBANKS-ROSEMARY ACCESS-CSP.pdf
Sherry,
Per Commissioner Taylor's request, attached is the alternative site plan with two ingress/egress driveways onto
Rosemary Lane.As previously discussed at our meeting on 8/31,we created this concept and reviewed with
Transportation and Fire; however,our client strongly believes this design would adversely affect the project and as a
result, we have decided not to pursue this plan. We are happy to present these findings at the hearing tomorrow but we
will respectfully request a vote on the submitted plan that was included in the backup package with one access to
Rosemary and one to Ridge.
Thank you,
Anna Weaver
Senior Planner
DAVIDSON
: res< w
CEI.E$RAT$N G YEARS
Main: 239.434.6060
Anna(c davidsonengineering.com
www.davidsonengineerinq.com
Naples, FL Sarasota, FL
1
PARKING REQUIREMENTS 1111 1 1 I 1
SVCPPE.CER'ER'•CC.0 SL.F'• 3/17.E243
50,3RE TEE- C.4 ) REF-4
ZONING ZONP.
SKIP..^ENTER 7 ST SO 1.1-1
PER LCC SEC 4 ORIN 0 1.3 510166 PAM PI KRVENT OF ,....„. ' 7 i .,
A 67.6.1561 CEWERS FLOOR AREA CPR PE COETPOSED -,, / 7, ‘`,.....__L__
cE RESTIRPIP6P5 VIM.,PROVSIPC 17006717.373
P11.6937.CEO DO 1RIO7 HAP:),F9Pc94-
RIDGE STREET(Pt-ELIC RIGHT OPH5AY)
6,"PRCPCSED6114-0013 PRE.7'1.28 SOU4RE FEE` -----
- I----
SC RESTALPLVO+ROCA AREA-S 3/7 SOLKRE FEET
-' 25FRONT YARD
207.Of SC 7 5661 POWNE PEET ,------'
SETBACKLANDSCAPE BUFFER1
ITS SOLPRE PEET 401 EXCESS CP W. i._/706 .I— - — —— — --,-
-- _._ _ _ _- — _- -_ —. .... ..__ ... _ — --
[Fa..O.IPS RE57•305.61T MEP ,-, i -L 6-- 1 '
. ...*:, - —
CEN'ER N,RXIMG...0.4,10.•,3 CPR 1 - "----1 , 1
-
RESTRURPARPERI.DC REOLSIEVENOS 0 ' i
_
6110PRNGOEFORP PAPP,.91639 PEI 65111 to
7` 6652 SPACES RECCIREID I , 71 1 I
--I 0 2. :
I 7--. I 1 Z : 3
EXCESS RES 74./51,PARIOA.11.5,OR 33 SEP,O I 1 EXIS•SHOP F.1. , ti 15
I-- I3 5 --i
163 SPACES REOIXRE.7 f CENTER AREA =- —1
I (RESTAURANT) I 1 1.7 1, 0 I
1, TT
OVER.PARKPIG PEOLIREMERT ( "14 593 SF 1.4 — 1)1C 11
.52 RERPOPEC CORER Tr. .10131PPLE 1 <Z— >IL
PESTMALVIT SOEPRE POOTACC • 16 5 "EXCESS . , Z-,. I ____ I
H
1 '-'NI I
RES-PuRENT SUM 7 163 02 SPREES 1 '' ,--. 1.6 _____i 1 w
- ,_
RR ;
t i10
—.-2I
" SHROOFP.EAOINRNGEEACSETNOTREYR
c4C1C),7W-_"- —1 /
1I
I -S-72---
: 541
—
- 4'1-- I 1___
I. I
DIFAING AREA- , "
NA ""---- I.• SF) _" t_
, l__ I
_ T ,
i Cj 1 I 8 j: 0,tA i
I I
: I 1
ell
..0 . _...—
LL . I I
— 1 M
I _ 4
-ONTIGUOUSLY OWNED
-
I lu
),_ PARCEL NOT INC)uoEr) , I
1 0 1
1 9 1 , — u-i IN PARKING EXEMPTION ) i"1
APPLICATION
I t __-
II 1 1
_
15.rrPd o III
t.- LANDSC.APE I LH 1 1 1-7-0' I I 't I 1 11
i soFFER ! , , ' III,1
'5 FRONT YARD SETBACK , cr. '
_ill!
i 1 L , y, -- 1 In - . ,
'
L ..... .......... - - - 1 1 _____J .. I.,
I - i 51..BJEC r PRO.ERTv
1 I .-.-1 (FMN(OAR, ' — r" — —
«...""
" 11:"`".- -10 TYPE 0 LANDSCAPE BUFFER,e I
•---_-,------,---,
""----___ ,---
__ .1
i I ROSEMARY 1-(51GHFS
! I SLSENVISIONC,4 <1_> <, -. 0 'AT TACHMENTI
-----1 ROSEMARY LANE(PUBLIC RICRIT-OF-WAY
ZONING ZONING _-
--------- 1 El I
(..„
1 atom m mm
_-_=-
PRELIIVIMARY-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ,--- ,
FilsonSue
From: Dianna Quintanilla <DQuintanilla@cyklawfirm.com>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 10:44 AM
To: FilsonSue
Subject: RE: Meeting Request: Pine Ridge Commons
Confirmed, thank you.
Dianna Quintanilla
CYK
Legal Assistant to
Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq.
The Northern Trust Building
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
P: 239.435.3535 1 F: 239.435.1218
dquintanillaacvklawfirm.com
Visit cyklawfirm.com to learn more about us.
Trusted & Verified
From: FilsonSue [mailto:SueFilson@colliergov.net]
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 10:37 AM
To: Dianna Quintanilla
Subject: RE: Meeting Request: Pine Ridge Commons
Hi Dianna,the only time I have prior to the mtg is Monday, December 11th at 2:30. Let me know if you want that.
Sue
From: Dianna Quintanilla [mailto:DQuintanilla@cyklawfirm.coml
Sent: Monday, December 4,2017 10:17 AM
To: FilsonSue<SueFilson@colliergov.net>
Subject: Meeting Request: Pine Ridge Commons
Good morning,
Rich, along with Wayne Arnold and David Genson would like to meet on the upcoming agenda item
on 12/12/17: Pine Ridge Commons.
Availability:
Tuesday December 5th at 4:00pm
Wednesday December 6th from 9:00 - 2:00
i
Thursday December 7th: 1:00 - 2:30
Friday December 8th: 9:00, 10:00
Monday December 11th: 9:00 - 3:00
Thank you.
Dianna Quintanilla
CYK
Legal Assistant to
Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq.
The Northern Trust Building
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples. Florida 34103
P. 239 435 3535 1 F• 239,435 1218
dcwintanillacvklawfirm.com
Visit cvklawfirm.com to learn more about us.
Trusted & Verified
•
Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
2
FilsonSue
From: FrenchJames
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 5:52 PM
To: FilsonSue
Cc: OchsLeo; CasalanguidaNick
Subject: FW: Proposed zoning change for Northeast Corner of Goodlette and Pine Ridge Rds
Hi Sue,
PL201600002360(GMPA) is presently in resubmittal status. The Planner assigned to this project has indicated that there
is no hearing date scheduled at this time for this project. PL20160002306 (PUDA) is presently in the resubmittal status
and there no hearing date presently scheduled for this project.
There was a NIM held last evening (April 24),whereas 60 residents were in attendance, with the majority opposing the
project.
Wayne Arnold, from Q Grady Minor, is heading the project up for the developer .
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
Jamie
James C. French, Deputy Department Head
Growth Management Department, Collier County Government
Development Services Bldg.
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104
Office(239) 252-5717-Mobile(239)289-6267
Begin forwarded message:
From: McDanielBill <WilliamMcDanielJr@colliergov.net>
Date: April 25, 2017 at 11:55:07 AM EDT
To: FrenchJames <jamesfrench@colliergov.net>
Subject: FW: Proposed zoning change for Northeast Corner of Goodlette and Pine Ridge
Rds
Hi Jamie, can you have someone give me the proposed agenda date for this proposed zoning
change? I looked in the Minute Trac and cannot locate it.
Thank you very much.
Sue
Original Message
From: Shelley & Jim Payer [mailto:tightlines10@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 10:41 AM
To: FialaDonna<DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>; SolisAndy <AndySolis@colliergov.net>;
SaundersBurt <BurtSaunders@colliergov.net>; TaylorPenny <PennyTaylor@colliergov.net>;
1
FilsonSue
From: McDanielBill
To: Shelley&Jim Payer
Subject: RE: Proposed zoning change for Northeast Corner of Goodlette and Pine Ridge Rds
Mr. & Mrs. Payer,
This will acknowledge receipt of your April 25, 2017 email expressing your opposition to the proposed zoning change at
the northeast corner of Goodlette and Pine Ridge Roads. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully consider all
comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioner.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future, please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Bill
William L. McDaniel,Jr.
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-8605
WEB PAGE: www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel
Original Message
From: Shelley&Jim Payer [mailto:tightlinesl0@comcast.net]
Sent:Tuesday,April 25, 2017 10:41 AM
To: FialaDonna <DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>; SolisAndy<AndySolis@colliergov.net>; SaundersBurt
<BurtSaunders@colliergov.net>;TaylorPenny<PennyTaylor@colliergov.net>; McDanielBill
<WilliamMcDanielJr@colliergov.net>
Cc: Ice Payer<tightlines10@comcast.net>
Subject: Proposed zoning change for Northeast Corner of Goodlette and Pine Ridge Rds
Dear Commissioners,
I am writing to you today in opposition to the proposed zoning change at the northeast corner of Goodlette and Pine
Ridge Roads. These are Petition# PL201600002360/CP-2016.3 Goodlette/PineRidge Commercial Infill Subdistrict
(GPMA) and PL20160002306, Pine Ridge Commons PUD (PUDA) submitted by Trail Boulevard LLP.
My husband and I live at 141 Caribbean Rd. in the Pine Ridge Estates Subdivision. This petition would change the zoning
from Commercial to Residential with a proposed 400 unit Apartment complex consisting of 4 stories over ground floor
parking.
Our reasons for objecting to this proposal are as follows:
1. We are all aware of the current traffic issues on Pine Ridge Rd. This 400 Unit Housing will compound them
substantially.
2. We are concerned about the water issue. A number of residents in Pine Ridge Estates have already had wells run dry
as a result of our current drought. This proposal will strain our water resources further, perhaps to the breaking point.
1
FilsonSue
From: FilsonSue on behalf of McDanielBill
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 7:42 AM
To: Shelley&Jim Payer
Subject: RE: Proposed zoning change for Northeast Corner of Goodlette and Pine Ridge Rds
Mr. & Mrs. Payer,
This will acknowledge receipt of your April 25, 2017 email expressing your opposition to the proposed zoning change at
the northeast corner of Goodlette and Pine Ridge Roads. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully consider all
comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioner.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future, please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Bill
William L. McDaniel,Jr.
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-8605
WEB PAGE: www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel
Original Message
From: Shelley&Jim Payer [maiito:tightlinesl0@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday,April 25, 2017 10:41 AM
To: FialaDonna <DonnaFiala@colliergov.net>; SolisAndy<AndySolis@colliergov.net>;SaundersBurt
<BurtSaunders@colliergov.net>;TaylorPenny<PennyTaylor@colliergov.net>; McDanielBill
<WilliamMcDanielJr@colliergov.net>
Cc: Ice Payer<tightlines10@comcast.net>
Subject: Proposed zoning change for Northeast Corner of Goodlette and Pine Ridge Rds
Dear Commissioners,
I am writing to you today in opposition to the proposed zoning change at the northeast corner of Goodlette and Pine
Ridge Roads. These are Petition# PL201600002360/CP-2016.3 Goodlette/PineRidge Commercial Infill Subdistrict
(GPMA) and PL20160002306, Pine Ridge Commons PUD (PUDA) submitted by Trail Boulevard LLP.
My husband and I live at 141 Caribbean Rd. in the Pine Ridge Estates Subdivision. This petition would change the zoning
from Commercial to Residential with a proposed 400 unit Apartment complex consisting of 4 stories over ground floor
parking.
Our reasons for objecting to this proposal are as follows:
1. We are all aware of the current traffic issues on Pine Ridge Rd. This 400 Unit Housing will compound them
substantially.
FilsonSue
From: FilsonSue on behalf of McDanielBill
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 3:23 PM
To: Iizsmith0517@aol.com
Subject: RE: Petitions PL20160002360/CP-2016-3 and PL20160002306
Mr. & Mrs. Smith,
This will acknowledge receipt of your email dated May 1, 2017 expressing your opposition to the proposed Pine Ridge
Commons development.Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully consider all comments and information
when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioners.
if!can be of assistance to you in the future, please do not hesitate to contact my office.
ede
William L. McDaniel,Jr.
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-8605
Web Page
WEB PAGE: —
Subscribe to our mailing list:
SUBSCRIBE
From: lizsmith0517@aol.com [mailto:lizsmith0517@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 3:15 PM
To: PennyTayor@colliergov.net; McDanielBill ; FialaDonna ; SolisAndy; BurtSaunders@colliergov.net.
Cc:jls2909@aol.com
Subject: Petitions PL20160002360/CP-2016-3 and PL20160002306
367 Ridge Drive
Naples, FL 34108
May 1, 2017
To: Board of County Commissioners
Subject: Petitions PL20160002360/CP-2016-3, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill
Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20160002306, Pine Ridge Commons PUD (PUDA)
bear Commissioners:
We are writing to inform you we wholeheartedly oppose the passing of the subject petitions and
beseech your help to ensure neither petition is passed.
We are residents of the Pine Ridge Estates area and are resolutely concerned about the
potential 400+ multi-family/townhouse proposed dwelling units. These proposed dwellings will
have a significant and lasting impact on our environment, our water supply, our schools, our
children's safety, and amplify an already afflictive, and potentially dangerous, compilation of
traffic issues.
We beseech your help on behalf of supporting your voters, to renounce all support for these
petitions and to vote "no". In doing so, you will thereby protect the intact, yet already
vulnerable, area of Pine Ridge Road and Goodlette-Frank.
We express our appreciation in advance.
Most respectfully,
Joseph & Elizabeth Smith
2
FilsonSue
From: Zlad Shahla MD MBA FACP <drshahlal l @comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 3:03 PM
To: HomiakKaren; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; EbertDiane; FryerEdwin; StrainMark;
ChrzanowskiStan; SchmittJoseph; eastmath@collierschools.com; BellowsRay
Cc: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt;TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; 'Ziad Shahla MD ';
jshahla1527@gmail.com
Subject: PUD
Caroline Martino &the PRCA Board
Dear members
Re: Pine Ridge Commons - PUD Application- PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
I am writing to voice my concerns and objections to the above referenced Planned Unit Development
application, as noted below:
1. The Neighborhood Information Meeting held on June 5 at North Naples Church was sub-standard and should
be disqualified as a valid meeting of the approval process. The following will outline the reasons for
disqualification:
•frequently inaudible (questions from attendees and answers from representatives)
•assumptive answers (assumed prior knowledge of project details)
•no hand-outs; no plans, sketches or `mock-ups' of the proposed housing units
'contradictory answers were given (e.g. answers to questions on traffic study)
•questions on one topic answered by information on another topic.
The community came to be informed, we left more confused than when we arrived.
2. Density - Proposed housing unit density at this location - 375 housing units are proposed, with anticipation of
at least 2 people per unit and anticipated minimum 2 cars per unit are not in keeping with the historical original
zoning
3. Height - Proposed height of planned housing units - 4 stories of housing over 1 story of parking. Current
height restrictions are 40' for retail and 50' for commercial. PUD calls for 60' with embellishments (65' total?).
Most of Pine Ridge homeowners' lots that back on to Goodlette-Frank Rd may be have been densely wooded in
the past but Hurricane Irma has clearly shown this cannot be taken for granted as a substantial buffer.
4. Conversion ratio - square footage of commercial to housing. It remains unclear why it is necessary to include
this in the PUD application. If the developer's plan is to build 375 housing units by a change of use, building on
currently empty land and removing some of the current commercial buildings,then that's the plan. No
conversion ratio necessary. If the plan is to build less than 375 housing units, then the application process
should start once their business model is defined and their plan is clear. Real concern remains that this
conversion ratio can be invoked at a later date to remove more of the remaining commercial buildings and
increase the number of housing units (more than 375).
5. Traffic -this PUD application proposes adding (assumed) 750-900 cars for(assumed) multiple trips per day,
and(assumed) frequently at concentrated times of the day, at one of the busiest intersections in the area. This
1
will adversely impact not only the actual Pine Ridge Road/Goodlette-Frank Road intersection, but also Panther
' Lane (owned and used by Pine Ridge Middle School students, parents and teachers),North Naples Church
parishioners and the Village School students, parents and teachers crossing or making U-turns on Goodlette-
Frank Rd to head south, Pine Ridge homeowners exiting Center Street making U-turns to head north on
Goodlette-Frank Rd, Autumn Woods homeowners crossing Goodlette-Frank Rd to turn south, everyone exiting
Pine Ridge Commons onto Pine Ridge Rd heading south on Goodlette (across 4 lanes of traffic), the Fire
Station on Pine R! idge Rd - and the list goes on.
In summary, I do not support this request to deviate again from the carefully considered, discussed, and
approved Collier County Growth Management Plan. My subsequent objections are to the proposed height, and
housing and traffic density of this project. At issue is the lack of detail provided to the community prior to the
PUD Application being considered for approval by the Planning Commission; and then further consideration
and super-majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners.
Thank you for your consideration of my concerns
Yours truly
Dr. Z Shahla and Jana Shahla
2
FilsonSue
From: McDanielBill
Sent: Friday,June 8, 2018 4:11 PM
To: Zlad Shahla MD MBA FACP
Subject: Re: PUD
Dr. & Mrs. Shahla,
Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to the proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD. It is very
helpful to receive your input on the issues that concern you. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully
consider all comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioners.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Bill
William L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-8605
WEB PAGE:
On Jun 8,2018, at 3:03 PM, ZIad Shahla MD MBA FACP <drshahlal l @comcast.net>wrote:
Caroline Martino &the PRCA Board
Dear members
Re: Pine Ridge Commons - PUD Application- PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
I am writing to voice my concerns and objections to the above referenced Planned Unit
Development application, as noted below:
1. The Neighborhood Information Meeting held on June 5 at North Naples Church was sub-
standard and should be disqualified as a valid meeting of the approval process. The following
will outline the reasons for disqualification:
•frequently inaudible (questions from attendees and answers from representatives)
•assumptive answers (assumed prior knowledge of project details)
•no hand-outs; no plans, sketches or `mock-ups' of the proposed housing units
•contradictory answers were given (e.g. answers to questions on traffic study)
•questions on one topic answered by information on another topic.
The community came to be informed, we left more confused than when we arrived.
1
2. Density - Proposed housing unit density at this location- 375 housing units are proposed, with
anticipation of at least 2 people per unit and anticipated minimum 2 cars per unit are not in
keeping with the historical original zoning
3. Height- Proposed height of planned housing units -4 stories of housing over 1 story of
parking. Current height restrictions are 40' for retail and 50' for commercial. PUD calls for 60'
with embellishments (65' total?). Most of Pine Ridge homeowners' lots that back on to
Goodlette-Frank Rd may be have been densely wooded in the past but Hurricane Irma has
clearly shown this cannot be taken for granted as a substantial buffer.
4. Conversion ratio - square footage of commercial to housing. It remains unclear why it is
necessary to include this in the PUD application. If the developer's plan is to build 375 housing
units by a change of use, building on currently empty land and removing some of the current
commercial buildings,then that's the plan. No conversion ratio necessary. If the plan is to build
less than 375 housing units,then the application process should start once their business model is
defined and their plan is clear. Real concern remains that this conversion ratio can be invoked at
a later date to remove more of the remaining commercial buildings and increase the number of
housing units(more than 375).
5. Traffic -this PUD application proposes adding (assumed) 750-900 cars for(assumed)multiple
trips per day, and (assumed) frequently at concentrated times of the day, at one of the busiest
intersections in the area. This will adversely impact not only the actual Pine Ridge
Road/Goodlette-Frank Road intersection,but also Panther Lane (owned and used by Pine Ridge
Middle School students,parents and teachers),North Naples Church parishioners and the Village
School students, parents and teachers crossing or making U-turns on Goodlette-Frank Rd to head
south, Pine Ridge homeowners exiting Center Street making U-turns to head north on Goodlette-
Frank Rd,Autumn Woods homeowners crossing Goodlette-Frank Rd to turn south, everyone
exiting Pine Ridge Commons onto Pine Ridge Rd heading south on Goodlette(across 4 lanes of
traffic),the Fire Station on Pine R! idge Rd - and the list goes on.
In summary, I do not support this request to deviate again from the carefully considered,
discussed, and approved Collier County Growth Management Plan. My subsequent objections
are to the proposed height, and housing and traffic density of this project. At issue is the lack of
detail provided to the community prior to the PUD Application being considered for approval by
the Planning Commission; and then further consideration and super-majority vote by the Board
of County Commissioners.
Thank you for your consideration of my concerns
Yours truly
Dr. Z Shahla and Jana Shahla
2
FilsonSue
From: chris@vonzwehl.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 1:33 PM
To: McDanielBill
Subject: RE: Pine Ridge Commons - PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
Thank you for your prompt reply Commissioner. Please keep up the good work Sir. Respectfully, Chris
From: FilsonSue<Sue.Filson@colliercountyfl.gov>On Behalf Of McDanielBill
Sent:Wednesday,June 20, 2018 1:27 PM
To: chris@vonzwehl.com
Subject: RE: Pine Ridge Commons- PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
Mr. & Mrs.Von Zwehl,
Thank you for copying me on your email to the Planning Commission Members to express your objections to the
proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD application. It is very helpful to receive your input on the issues that concern
you. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully consider all comments and information when this item is
presented to the Board of County Commissioners.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact my office.
sea
William L. McDaniel,Jr., Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-36C5
1111
Web Page
WEB PAGE:
From:chris@vonzwehl.com [mailto:chris@vonzwehl.com]
Sent:Wednesday,June 20,2018 1:21 PM
To: HomiakKaren<Karen.Homiak@colliercountyfl.gov>;pdearborn@iohnrwood.cor EbertDiane
<Diane.EbertC7a coiliercountyf.gc >; FryerEdwin<Edwin.Fryer@colliercountyfl.gov>; StrainMark
<Mark.StrainPcolliercountyfl.gov>;ChrzanowskiStan<Stan.Chrzanowski@colliercountvfl.gov>; Schmittloseph
<joseph.Schm t @coi iercountyi.gov>; eaS�iTtaccr co.;iersc loo s.com; BellowsRay >
Cc: brett.blackledge@naplesnews.com; McDanielBill<Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.govr>;TaylorPenny
< e :^y.Tay!or@co.::ercountyf!.gov>;TaylorPenny<Jenny.Taylor`ce.`: erc...n : >; SolisAndy
< ,,cs,, Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; FialaDonna<Donna.Fiala@colliercountyfl.gol >
Subject: Re: Pine Ridge Commons- PUD Application-PETITION CP-2016-03/P120160002360
Dear Planning Commissioner Member,
Re: Pine Ridge Commons- PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
FilsonSue
From: Iizsmith0517@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday,June 20, 2018 1:03 PM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt;TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; HomiakKaren;
pdearborn@johnrwood.com; EbertDiane; FryerEdwin; StrainMark; ski@colliergov.net;
SchmittJoseph; eastmath@collierschools.com; BellowsRay
Subject: Pine Ridge Commons - PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/P! L20160002360
Attachments: RE: Pine Ridge Commons - PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/P! L20160002360
Dear Respected Representatives:
As homeowners within Pine Ridge Estates, we are extremely concerned with the potential impact of the subject
petition, to our community. We know you all care about maintaining the health of our infrastructure and the
resulting safety and well-being on local citizens. However, we are gravely concerned by the way this petition
has come forward and is charging false and exaggerated upside to the community.
We understand the developers of the subject application are requesting your approval to change the zoning to
their financial benefit. However,the negative impact on our community is beyond comprehension due to the
change in potential population density...whether it's our storm water, our traffic, our personal safety, our school
over-crowding, and most importantly, our children and their safety. We in no way, support this rezoning.
We rely on each one of you to protect our community and ensure we remain the premier "Naples" we are. We
ask your support and your "no" vote, to ensure this application does not pass and is refused, revoked and
dismissed. We trust you will support our community's position to protect us from the passing of this
petition. When we vote for each of you as representatives, we trust you to keep our best interest at the core of
your decision-making. Please don't let us down!
Thank you in advance for your accountable stewardship, protecting the growth of our community. We look
forward to your "no" votes to this petition.
All the best to each of you,
Joseph and Elizabeth Smith
367 Ridge Drive
Naples, FL 34108
1
FilsonSue
From: McDanielBill
Sent: Friday,June 8, 2018 4:12 PM
To: Robert Eardley
Subject: Re: Pine Ridge Commons - PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
Mr. Eardley,
Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to the proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD. It is very helpful to
receive your input on the issues that concern you. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully consider all
comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioners.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Bill
William L. McDaniel, Jr.,Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail,East
Napes, =L 34 E 2
239-252-&6Q4
1111
WEB PAGE: .
On Jun 8,2018,at 3:57 PM, Robert Eardley<:-cber `swf:or cla-aw.com>wrote:
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am a Pine Ridge resident and am writing to voice my concerns and objections to the above application.
1. The Neighborhood Information Meeting held on June 5 at North Naples Church was sub-standard
and should be disqualified as a valid meeting of the approval process.
2. Density-Proposed housing unit density at this location -375 housing units are proposed,with
anticipation of at least 2 people per unit and anticipated minimum 2 cars per unit are not in keeping
with the historical original zoning
1
3. Height- Proposed height of planned housing units-4 stories of housing over 1 story of
parking. Current height restrictions are 40'for retail and 50'for commercial. PUD calls for 60' with
embellishments (65'total?). Most of Pine Ridge homeowners' lots that back on to Goodlette-Frank Rd
may be have been densely wooded in the past but Hurricane Irma has clearly shown this cannot be
taken for granted as a substantial buffer.
4. Conversion ratio-square footage of commercial to housing. It remains unclear why it is necessary to
include this in the PUD application. If the developer's plan is to build 375 housing units by a change of
use, building on currently empty land and removing some of the current commercial buildings,then
that's the plan. No conversion ratio necessary. If the plan is to build less than 375 housing units,then
the application process should start once their business model is defined and their plan is clear. Real
concern remains that this conversion ratio can be invoked at a later date to remove more of the
remaining commercial buildings and increase the number of housing units (more than 375).
5. Traffic-this PUD application proposes adding(assumed) 750-900 cars for(assumed) multiple trips
per day, and (assumed)frequently at concentrated times of the day, at one of the busiest intersections
in the area. This will adversely impact not only the actual Pine Ridge Road/Goodlette-Frank Road
intersection, but also Panther Lane (owned and used by Pine Ridge Middle School students, parents and
teachers), North Naples Church parishioners and the Village School students, parents and teachers
crossing or making U-turns on Goodlette-Frank Rd to head south, Pine Ridge homeowners exiting Center
Street making U-turns to head north on Goodlette-Frank Rd, Autumn Woods homeowners crossing
Goodlette-Frank Rd to turn south, everyone exiting Pine Ridge Commons onto Pine Ridge Rd heading
south on Goodlette (across 4 lanes of traffic),the Fire Station on Pine Ridge Rd.
In summary, I do not support this request to deviate from Collier County Growth Management Plan.
Thank you for your consideration.
ROBERT H.EARDLEY,Esq.,LL.M.
Board Certified Wills, Trusts&Estates Lawyer
Law Office of Robert H.Eardley,P.A.
1415 Panther Lane, Suite 221
Naples,FL 34109
Office: (239)591-6776
Fax: (239)591-6777
Email: robert(d,,swflorida-law.com
Web: www.swflorida-law.com
The information contained in this transmission may be attorney-client privileged and confidential.It is intended only for the use
of the individual or entity named above.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that
any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication
in error,please notify us immediately by e-mail or by telephone collect at(239)591-6776 and delete the original message.Thank
you.
2
FilsonSue
From: McDanielBill
Sent: Saturday,June 9, 2018 3:51 PM
To: Fred Yakel
Subject: Re: Pine Ridge Commons (north-east corner Goodlette Frank Rd & Pine Ridge Rd)
Mr. Yakel,
Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to the proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD. It is very
helpful to receive your input on the issues that concern you. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully
consider all comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioners.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Bill
William L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-8605 VE 'age
all
WEB PAGE:
On Jun 9, 2018, at 3:45 PM, Fred Yakel <fyakel@comcast.net>wrote:
On June 8, 2018 at 2:50 PM Pine Ridge <prca@pineridge34108.com>wrote:
Dear Pine Ridge Neighbor
Many of you are aware that there is a PUD (Planned Unit Development) application
in process for"Pine Ridge Commons" (north-east corner of Goodlette Frank Road &
Pine Ridge Road). This PUD calls for changing the use from 'commercial and retail',
to 'mixed use- commercial, retail and 375 housing units (planned as rentals). The
developer held a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on Tuesday June 5 at
North Naples Church, but this did little to allay the primary concerns.
Should you also be concerned about this development and wish to voice your
opinion we have provided a short text which you may want to copy, paste and
personalize. The mail should be sent to all members of the Planning Commission
(PUD and Approval are slated for Thursday, June 21 meeting), and all County
Commissioners (final approval slated for Tuesday, July 10th Board of County
Commissioners' meeting)- names and email addresses provided below.
Caroline Martino &the PRCA Board
Dear
Re: Pine Ridge Commons- PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-
03/PL20160002360
I am writing to voice my concerns and objections to the above referenced Planned
Unit Development application, as noted below:
1. The Neighborhood Information Meeting held on June 5 at North Naples Church
was sub-standard and should be disqualified as a valid meeting of the approval
process. The following will outline the reasons for disqualification:
•frequently inaudible (questions from attendees and answers from representatives)
FilsonSue
From: Susan DeVito <sdevito64@me.com>
Sent: Friday,June 8, 2018 9:43 PM
To: HomiakKaren; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; EbertDiane; FryerEdwin; StrainMark;
ChrzanowskiStan; Schmittioseph; eastmath@collierschools.com; BellowsRay;
FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Pine Ridge Commons - PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
Attachments: Re: Pine Ridge Commons - PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
To Whom It May Concern
Re:Pine Ridge Commons-PUD Application-PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
I am writing to voice our concerns and objections to the above referenced Planned Unit Development application,as noted
below:
1. The Neighborhood Information Meeting held on June 5 at North Naples Church was sub-standard and should be disqualified
as a valid meeting of the approval process. The following will outline the reasons for disqualification:
•frequently inaudible(questions from attendees and answers from representatives)
•assumptive answers(assumed prior knowledge of project details)
•no hand-outs;no plans,sketches or`mock-ups' of the proposed housing units
•contradictory answers were given(e.g. answers to questions on traffic study)
•questions on one topic answered by information on another topic.
The community came to be informed,we left more confused than when we arrived.
2. Density-Proposed housing unit density at this location-375 housing units are proposed,with anticipation of at least 2
people per unit and anticipated minimum 2 cars per unit are not in keeping with the historical original zoning
3. Height-Proposed height of planned housing units-4 stories of housing over 1 story of parking. Current height restrictions
are 40' for retail and 50' for commercial. PUD calls for 60' with embellishments(65' total?). Most of Pine Ridge
homeowners' lots that back on to Goodlette-Frank Rd may be have been densely wooded in the past but Hurricane Irma has
clearly shown this cannot be taken for granted as a substantial buffer.
4. Conversion ratio-square footage of commercial to housing. It remains unclear why it is necessary to include this in the
PUD application. If the developer's plan is to build 375 housing units by a change of use,building on currently empty land and
removing some of the current commercial buildings,then that's the plan. No conversion ratio necessary. If the plan is to build
less than 375 housing units,then the application process should start once their business model is defined and their plan is
clear. Real concern remains that this conversion ratio can be invoked at a later date to remove more of the remaining
commercial buildings and increase the number of housing units(more than 375).
5. Traffic-this PUD application proposes adding(assumed)750-900 cars for(assumed)multiple trips per day,and(assumed)
frequently at concentrated times of the day,at one of the busiest intersections in the area. This will adversely impact not only
the actual Pine Ridge Road/Goodlette-Frank Road intersection,but also Panther Lane(owned and used by Pine Ridge Middle
School students,parents and teachers),North Naples Church parishioners and the Village School students,parents and teachers
crossing or making U-turns on Goodlette-Frank Rd to head south,Pine Ridge homeowners exiting Center Street making U-
turns to head north on Goodlette-Frank Rd,Autumn Woods homeowners crossing Goodlette-Frank Rd to turn south,everyone
exiting Pine Ridge Commons onto Pine Ridge Rd heading south on Goodlette(across 4 lanes of traffic),the Fire Station on Pine
R! idge Rd-and the list goes on.
In summary,I do not support this request to deviate again from the carefully considered,discussed,and approved Collier
County Growth Management Plan. My subsequent objections are to the proposed height,and housing and traffic density of this
1
project. At issue is the lack of detail provided to the community prior to the PUD Application being considered for approval by
the Planning Commission;and then further consideration and super-majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners.
Thank you for your consideration regarding this enormous potential mistake
Susan and Andrew DeVito
2
FilsonSue
From: Robert Eardley <robert@swflorida-law.com>
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 4:20 PM
To: McDanielBill
Subject: RE: Pine Ridge Commons - PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
Thank you!
ROBERT H. EARDLEY, Esq., LL.M.
Board Certified Wills,Trusts& Estates Lawyer Law Office of Robert H. Eardley, P.A.
1415 Panther Lane,Suite 221
Naples, FL 34109
Office: (239)591-6776
Fax: (239) 591-6777
Email: robert@swflorida-law.com
Web:www.swflorida-law.com
The information contained in this transmission may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. It is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail or by telephone collect at(239) 591-6776
and delete the original message.Thank you.
Original Message
From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Friday,June 8, 2018 4:12 PM
To: Robert Eardley<robert@swflorida-law.com>
Subject: Re: Pine Ridge Commons- PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
Mr. Eardley,
Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to the proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD. It is very helpful to
receive your input on the issues that concern you. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully consider all
comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioners.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Bill
William L. McDaniel,Jr.,Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East<x-apple-data-detectors://2/0>
Naples, FL 34112<x-apple-data-detectors://2/0>
239-252-8605<te1:239-252-8605>
WEB PAGE: [Web Website Button] <http://www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel>
On Jun 8, 2018, at 3:57 PM, Robert Eardley<robert@swflorida-law.com<mailto:robert@swflorida-law.com»wrote:
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
1
FilsonSue
From: FilsonSue on behalf of McDanielBill
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 8:27 AM
To: fxrp@embarqmail.com
Subject: FW: Pine Ridge Commons PUD Application Petition CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
Mr. Schneider,
Thank you for contacting me to express your support for the proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD Application Petition
CP-2016-03/PL20160002360. It is very helpful to receive your input on the issues that concern you.Your opinion is
important to me and i wiii carefully consider ail comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of
County Commissioners.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact my office.
William L. McDaniel,Jr., Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-8605
Web Rage
WEB PAGE:
From:Cliff Schneider [mailto:fxrp@embargmail.com]
Sent:Thursday,June 14, 2018 8:13 AM
To: HomiakKaren ; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; EbertDiane ; FryerEdwin ; StrainMark; ChrzanowskiStan ;
SchmittJoseph; eastmath@collierschools.com; BellowsRay; FialaDonna ; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt;TaylorPenny;
McDanielBill
Cc:AAACliff Schneider
Subject: Pine Ridge Commons PUD Application Petition CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
14 JUNE 2018
CLIFFORD H. SCHNEIDER
234 TUPELO RD.
NAPLES, FL 34108
District 3 : Diane K. Ebert, Secretary DianeEbert@colliergov.net
District 4 : Edwin Fryer EdwinFryer@colliergov.net
District 5 : Mark Strain, Chair markstrain@colliergov.net
At-Large Environmental : Stan Chrzanowski StanChrzanowski@coiiiergov.net
At-Large Environmental : Joseph Schmitt.iosephSchmittgcoiiiergov.net
School Board(Non-Voting) : Thomas Eastman eastmath@caiierschoo'is.com
County Liaison : Ray Bellows ayBellows;(coil ergov.ne:
Collier County Board of Commissioners
District 1: Donna Fiala: DolnaFlala@colliergov.net
District 2: Andy Solis, Esq AndySolis@colliergov.net
District 3: Burt Saunders BurtSaunders@colliergov.net
District 4: Penny Taylor PennyTaylor@colliergov.net
District 5: William L McDaniel, Jr BillMcDaniel@colliergov.net
3
FilsonSue
From: FilsonSue on behalf of McDanielBill
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 2:11 PM
To: Ross Edlund
Subject: RE: Pine Ridge Commons - PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/P! L20160002360
Mr. Edlund,
Thank you for contacting me to express your opinion to the proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD. It is very
helpful to receive your input on the issues that concern you. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully
consider all comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioners.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Bill
William L. McDaniel, Jr.,Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 5
3299 1 amiami Trail, Last
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-8605
Please Note New Email Address Beginning December 9,2017
Bi1I.mcdaniel4i)eolliercountvfl.gov
1111 Wet«Page
WEB PAGE:
From: Ross Edlund [mailto:ROSSEDLUND@msn.com]
Sent:Wednesday,June 13, 2018 2:00 PM
To: HomiakKaren ; pdearborn@johnrwood.com; EbertDiane; FryerEdwin ; StrainMark; ChrzanowskiStan ;
SchmittJoseph; eastmath@collierschools.com; BellowsRay; FialaDonna ; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt;TaylorPenny;
McDanielBill
Subject: Re: Pine Ridge Commons-PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/P! L20160002360
Dear Commissioners,
I strongly object to the proposed rezoning my neighborhood of Pine Ridge to allow for the construction of
approximately 400 units of apartment housing. We are residents of Pine Ridge for nearly 20 years-- my wife
and I chose the community for its rural style living, the fact it is not gated, and for its spacious, non-intrusive
life style. It is a unique residential area and its character does not deserve to be altered by changing the zoning
and adding increased density.
We hopefully would all be able to enjoy the community we select to make our home and not to have its
character detrimentally altered by developers' profit motive. Leave Pine Ridge the way it is.
Sincerely,
1
Ross Edlund, CEO
Skillets Restaurants
5461 Airport Rd N
Naples, FL 34109
Residential address: 220 Hickory Road, 34108
2
FilsonSue
From: Marni Chur <marnichur@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday,June 13, 2018 12:49 PM
To: McDanielBill
Subject: Re: Pine Ridge Commons
Thank you,we appreciate your time on this matter. Best, Marni and Neil Chur
>On Jun 13, 2018, at 12:40 PM, McDanielBill<Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>wrote:
> Mr. & Mrs. Chur,
>Thank you for contacting me to express your opinion to the proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD. It is very helpful to
receive your input on the issues that concern you. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully consider all
comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioners.
> If I can be of assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact my office.
> Bill
>William L. McDaniel,Jr.,Vice Chairman Commissioner, District 5
>3299 Tamiami Trail, East
> Naples, FL 34112
> 239-252-8605
> Please Note New Email Address Beginning December 9, 2017
> Bill.mcdaniel@colliercountyfl.gov
>WEB PAGE: <image001.png>
> Original Message
> From: Marni Chur [mailto:marnichur@yahoo.com]
>Sent:Tuesday,June 12, 2018 5:45 PM
>To: McDanielBill<Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>
>Subject: Pine Ridge Commons
> Dear Mr. McDaniel,
> Re: Pine Ridge Commons- PUD Application- PETITION
>CP-2016-03/PL20160002360 I am writing to voice my concerns and objections to the above referenced Planned Unit
Development application, as noted below:
> 1. The Neighborhood Information Meeting held on June 5 at North Naples Church was sub-standard and should be
disqualified as a valid meeting of the approval process. The following will outline the reasons for disqualification:
> •frequently inaudible (questions from attendees and answers from representatives) •assumptive answers(assumed
prior knowledge of project details) •no hand-outs; no plans, sketches or'mock-ups' of the proposed housing units
•contradictory answers were given (e.g. answers to questions on traffic study) •questions on one topic answered by
information on another topic.
>The community came to be informed, we left more confused than when we arrived.
1
> 2. Density- Proposed housing unit density at this location-375
>housing units are proposed, with anticipation of at least 2 people per
> unit and anticipated minimum 2 cars per unit are not in keeping with
>the historical original zoning
>3. Height- Proposed height of planned housing units-4 stories of housing over 1 story of parking. Current height
restrictions are 40'for retail and 50'for commercial. PUD calls for 60'with embellishments(65'total?). Most of Pine
Ridge homeowners' lots that back on to Goodlette-Frank Rd may be have been densely wooded in the past but
Hurricane Irma has clearly shown this cannot be taken for granted as a substantial buffer.
>4. Conversion ratio-square footage of commercial to housing. It remains unclear why it is necessary to include this in
the PUD application. If the developer's plan is to build 375 housing units by a change of use, building on currently empty
land and removing some of the current commercial buildings, then that's the plan. No conversion ratio necessary. If the
plan is to build less than 375 housing units,then the application process should start once their business model is
defined and their plan is clear. Real concern remains that this conversion ratio can be invoked at a later date to remove
more of the remaining commercial buildings and increase the number of housing units (more than 375).
>5. Traffic-this PUD application proposes adding(assumed) 750-900 cars for(assumed) multiple trips per day, and
(assumed)frequently at concentrated times of the day, at one of the busiest intersections in the area. This will
adversely impact not only the actual Pine Ridge Road/Goodlette-Frank Road intersection, but also Panther Lane (owned
and used by Pine Ridge Middle School students, parents and teachers), North Naples Church parishioners and the Village
School students, parents and teachers crossing or making U-turns on Goodlette-Frank Rd to head south, Pine Ridge
homeowners exiting Center Street making U-turns to head north on Goodlette-Frank Rd,Autumn Woods homeowners
crossing Goodlette-Frank Rd to turn south, everyone exiting Pine Ridge Commons onto Pine Ridge Rd heading south on
Goodlette (across 4 lanes of traffic),the Fire Station on Pine R! idge Rd -and the list goes on.
> In summary, I do not support this request to deviate again from the carefully considered, discussed, and approved
Collier County Growth Management Plan. My subsequent objections are to the proposed height, and housing and traffic
density of this project. At issue is the lack of detail provided to the community prior to the PUD Application being
considered for approval by the Planning Commission; and then further consideration and super-majority vote by the
Board of County Commissioners.
>Thank you for your consideration of my concerns Yours truly,
> Marni and Neil Chur 700 Myrtle Road
> Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to
a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
2
FilsonSue
From: McDanielBill
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 5:10 PM
To: mklww@aol.com
Subject: Re: Pine Ridge Commons
Mr. & Mrs. Stawski,
Thank you for contacting me to express your opinion to the proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD. It is very
helpful to receive your input on the issues that concern you. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully
consider all comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioners.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Bill
William L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-8605
Please Note New Email Address Beginning December 9, 2017
Bill.mcdaniel()colliercountvfl.go8
III Web fine
WEB PAGE:
On Jun 12, 2018, at 12:37 PM, "mklww@aol.com" <mklww@aol.com>wrote:
Dear All of the above:
Re: Pine Ridge Commons- PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/P! L20160002360
I/we believe it is extremely important to remind members of the Planning Commission and the
County Commissioners that a property owner is entitled to the current zoning of their property!
The zoning laws serve all community members. Developers have no right to expect the County
Commissioners to change the zoning for the benefit of the Developer and to the detriment of
community members. Additionally, the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP)was put in
place to assure our comm unity grows and develops in a responsible manner.
The 31 acre property in question has already been re-zoned once before at the request of the
Developer. The original zoning was Rural Agricultural and Residential Single Family (RSF-3). RSF-3
permits three dwelling units per acre while the Agricultural Zoning permits one dwelling unit per five
acres. A zoning change was granted (December 14, 1999)to allow retail and commercial use at this
location. We do not believe that an exception to the GMP and zoning for this site should be granted
for a second time.
I/we, the community members trust the Planning Commission and County Commissioners to follow
the GMP - not to ignore and change it simply to meet the changing desires of Developers.
yours truly
Linda and Jerry Stawski, 173 Tupelo RD,Pine Ridge Estates
1
FilsonSue
From: Sheldon Starman <sstarman@rwhsgcpa.com>
Sent: Tuesday,June 12, 2018 12:06 PM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt;TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; EbertDiane
Subject: Pine Ridge Commons
Attachments: RE: Pine Ridge Commons
Gentlemen and Ladies—
I believe it is extremely important to remind members of the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners
that a community is entitled to the current zoning of the property in which we settle.
The zoning laws serve all community members. Developers have no right to expect the County Commissioners to
change the zoning for the benefit of the Developer and to the detriment of community members. Additionally, the
Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP)was put in place to assure our community grows and develops in a
responsible manner.
The 31 acre property in question has already been re-zoned once before at the request of the Developer. The
original zoning was Rural Agricultural and Residential Single Family (RSF-3). RSF-3 permits three dwelling units
per acre while the Agricultural Zoning permits one dwelling unit per five acres. A zoning change was granted
(December 14, 1999)to allow retail and commercial use at this location. We do not believe that an exception to the
GMP and zoning for this site should be granted for a second time, nor should it be granted to so dramatically
increase the density of any portion of the Pine Ridge subdivision.
The community members trust the Planning Commission and County Commissioners to follow the GMP- not to
ignore and change it simply to meet the changing desires of Developers.
yours truly
Sieldat Stovustaa
Sheldon W Starman, CPA
1
FilsonSue
From: Benjamin King <floridaseller@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 7:45 AM
To: HomiakKaren; Patrick DearbornLLC; EbertDiane; FryerEdwin; StrainMark;
ChrzanowskiStan; SchmittJoseph; eastmath@collierschools.com; BellowsRay;
FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; Pine Ridge
Subject: Proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD Zoning
Attachments: RE: Proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD Zoning
Proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD Comments
To the Collier County Planning Commission & the
Collier County Board of Commissioners
We have thoroughly enjoyed being full time residents of Naples for over the past 20+ years. It has
been a special place for us to live. We realize growth is inevitable, but in the last few years it has
really accelerated at an unhealthy pace. So many new large developments have been built or are
being built. This has resulted in traffic issues so bad that we avoid many areas during the busy
season. The last season has been by far the worst. The infrastructure has to catch up with the
existing growth. The Collier County Growth Management Plan was put in place to assure our
community grows and develops in a responsible manner. We feel that granting a zoning variance
on this property to build 375 housing units at a height of 5 stories on this property is not the right
decision to make.
Benjamin & Kathleen King
56 Myrtle Rd.
Naples, FL 34108
FilsonSue
From: Benjamin King <floridaseller@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday,June 11, 2018 10:56 AM
To: McDanielBill
Subject: Proposed Pine Ridge Commons Put
Attachments: RE: Proposed Pine Ridge Commons Put
My name is Benjamin King. My wife, Kathleen King and I have lived at 56 Myrtle Rd. in Pine Ridge for over 20
years. We both attended the June 5, 2018 Meeting and agree with all the comments listed below. The meeting was
really was sub-standard and should be disqualified. The density of this development and its impact on already
existing traffic issues on Goodlette and Pine Ridge roads particularly in season really needs to be addressed.
Dear William L. McDaniel, Jr.
Re: Pine Ridge Commons- PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/PL20160002360
I am writing to voice my concerns and objections to the above referenced Planned Unit Development application, as
noted below:
1. The Neighborhood Information Meeting held on June 5 at North Naples Church was sub-standard and should be
disqualified as a valid meeting of the approval process. The following will outline the reasons for disqualification:
•frequently inaudible (questions from attendees and answers from representatives)
•assumptive answers (assumed prior knowledge of project details)
•no hand-outs; no plans, sketches or`mock-ups' of the proposed housing units
•contradictory answers were given (e.g. answers to questions on traffic study)
•questions on one topic answered by information on another topic.
The community came to be informed, we left more confused than when we arrived.
2. Density- Proposed housing unit density at this location - 375 housing units are proposed, with anticipation of at
least 2 people per unit and anticipated minimum 2 cars per unit are not in keeping with the historical original zoning
3. Height- Proposed height of planned housing units-4 stories of housing over 1 story of parking. Current height
restrictions are 40' for retail and 50' for commercial. PUD calls for 60' with embellishments (65' total?). Most of Pine
Ridge homeowners' lots that back on to Goodlette-Frank Rd may be have been densely wooded in the past but
Hurricane Irma has clearly shown this cannot be taken for granted as a substantial buffer.
4. Conversion ratio - square footage of commercial to housing. It remains unclear why it is necessary to include this
in the PUD application. If the developer's plan is to build 375 housing units by a change of use, building on currently
empty land and removing some of the current commercial buildings, then that's the plan. No conversion ratio
necessary. If the plan is to build less than 375 housing units, then the application process should start once their
business model is defined and their plan is clear. Real concern remains that this conversion ratio can be invoked at
a later date to remove more of the remaining commercial buildings and increase the number of housing units (more
than 375).
5. Traffic-this PUD application proposes adding (assumed) 750-900 cars for(assumed) multiple trips per day, and
(assumed)frequently at concentrated times of the day, at one of the busiest intersections in the area. This will
adversely impact not only the actual Pine Ridge Road/Goodlette-Frank Road intersection, but also Panther Lane
(owned and used by Pine Ridge Middle School students, parents and teachers), North Naples Church parishioners
and the Village School students, parents and teachers crossing or making U-turns on Goodlette-Frank Rd to head
south, Pine Ridge homeowners exiting Center Street making U-turns to head north on Goodlette-Frank Rd, Autumn
Woods homeowners crossing Goodlette-Frank Rd to turn south, everyone exiting Pine Ridge Commons onto Pine
Ridge Rd heading south on Goodlette (across 4 lanes of traffic), the Fire Station on Pine R! idge Rd - and the list
goes on.
In summary, I do not support this request to deviate again from the carefully considered, discussed, and approved
Collier County Growth Management Plan. My subsequent objections are to the proposed height, and housing and
traffic density of this project. At issue is the lack of detail provided to the community prior to the PUD Application
being considered for approval by the Planning Commission; and then further consideration and super-majority vote
by the Board of County Commissioners.
Thank you for your consideration of my concerns
Yours truly
1
Benjamin and Kathleen King
2
FilsonSue
From: McDanielBill
Sent: Monday,June 11, 2018 8:16 PM
To: Susan Grant
Subject: Re: Pine Ridge Commons - PUD Application - PETITION CP-2016-03/P! L20160002360
Ms. Grant,
Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to the proposed Pine Ridge Commons PUD. It is very
helpful to receive your input on the issues that concern you. Your opinion is important to me and I will carefully
consider all comments and information when this item is presented to the Board of County Commissioners.
If I can be of assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Bill
William L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chairman
Commissioner, District 5
3299 Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, FL 34112
239-252-8605
___
WebPape
WEB PAGE: -
On Jun 11, 2018, at 7:45 PM, Susan Grant<scgrantcpa a@gmail.com>wrote:
Dear Commissioner McDaniel:
We have been residents of Pine Ridge Estates for over 30 years, and we moved here
for the open space, large lots, and family atmosphere. It is turning into gated and locked
lots, cut-through traffic, and car break-ins on weekends. Please do not contribute to
more cut-through traffic, congestion, and dangerous intersections for Pine Ridge
Residents!
We believe it is extremely important to remind members of the Planning Commission and the County
Commissioners that we, as long-time property owners, are entitled to the current zoning of our
property! We do not appreciate developers coming in Pine Ridge or around the corner, splitting up
lots or changing the zoning for the developers' personal financial gain.
The zoning laws serve all community members. Developers have no right to expect the County
Commissioners to change the zoning for the benefit of the Developer and to the detriment of
community members. Additionally, the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) was put in
place to assure our community grows and develops in a responsible manner.
The 31 acre property in question has already been re-zoned once before at the request of the
Developer. The original zoning was Rural Agricultural and Residential Single Family(RSF-3). RSF-3
permits three dwelling units per acre while the Agricultural Zoning permits one dwelling unit per five
acres. A zoning change was granted (December 14, 1999) to allow retail and commercial use at this
location. We do not believe that an exception to the GMP and zoning for this site should be granted
for a second time.
We, the community members, trust the Planning Commission and County Commissioners to follow
the GMP - not to ignore and change it simply to meet the changing desires of greedy Developers.
This is paradise! Do not turn us into Miami please!
1
Yours truly,
Gary W. and Susan C. Grant
151 Caribbean Road
Pine Ridge Estates
2
Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr.
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
September 11, 2018
CONSENT AGENDA
16.A.15. This item requires that sx parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.Should a
hearing be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to
approve for recording the minor final plat of Egrets Crossing,Application Number
PL20180000399.
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE Meetings I f Correspondence e-mails I )Calls
16.A.16. This item requires that x parte disclosurE be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for
recording the minor final plat Kopper's Subdivision,Application Number P120180001836.
X NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE I 1Meetings Correspondence _e-mails (Calls
SUMMARY AGENDA
17.A. This item requires that x parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.Should a hearing
be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve
Petition VAC-P120170004446 to disclaim,renounce and vacate the conservation easement
described in O.R. Book 3635, Page 3683 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.The subject
property is located on the south side of Livingston Woods Lane,just north of the Pine Ridge Road
and Whippoorwill Lane intersection,in Section 7,Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida.
V NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE Meetings Correspondence I le-mails ^Calls
Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr.
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
September 11, 2018
17.B. This item requires that >x parte disclosu, be provided by Commission members.Should a hearing
be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve
Petition VAC-PL20180001141,to disclaim, renounce and vacate the County and the public interest
in the 10-foot drainage easement on the north side of the property and a portion of the 15-foot
drainage easement on the south side of the property,on Lot 35,Collier County Production Park
Phase 1-B,as recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages 7-8 of the public records of Collier County, Florida,
located on the west side of Livingston Road,just south of Exchange Avenue in Section 36,Township
49 South, Range 25 East,Collier County, Florida.
X NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE Meetings (Correspondence He-mails Calls
17.C. This item requires that 'x parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.Should a hearing
be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve
Petition VAC-PL20170004446 to disclaim,renounce and vacate the conservation easement
described in O.R. Book 3635, Page 3683 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.The subject
property is located on the south side of Livingston Woods Lane,just north of the Pine Ridge Road
and Whippoorwill Lane intersection,in Section 7,Township 49 South, Range 26 East,Collier
County, Florida.
X NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE Meetings Correspondence e-mails Calls